Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-126 2 xi 0. O z ,e i 0I'r� I e 3I/2. ttvvr� • QO 9, •O •O c) O •- r ,o Q Q c ° m , I Cl) fit. .:.i. z r 0 ©i Q © 414 " 0 D --I I 1 O z ?CS � OOOUK>1 1 1 i i 1 1 i k $ i i a GEVRON FACUTY FOR PER AT Geo WAY 01)OAKSDAI,E I ' L > ii iii 11111:1111:111ilill! =Ri�Oig CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C. �s NEC SW GRADY WAY & OAKESDALE AVE SW •�_ a�=@@QAaa�s!I~II S 7 g, RENTON, WASHINGTON I `64•• 9g S4 i F2 - 13 T23N R4E E 1/2 ,M. ,, ;) c.) I z LM C❑ ,/j , ,S 7th St. ,CP \ C❑ U • ` IMF IM Q I M� il CO I -1 ` ti;Taj -------- — - '-� 1 Sw 1C \-t,;'; _- , kt...:jl___---------- sw% \ '' \ __I 000 _ -:1-\ i - 1T ' Mr#111111 .i" W I M a '� `-% a \ I-405 N - z I �� - IM IM SW1 i6th St. _-.__--� SW \ \ -.. CQ' IM H: 1 ccs....'# ' - - - C . CQ I \ ; C I \,,,,. i H2 • 25 T23N R4E E 1/2 ° 4 0 G2 1;4800 ®$ PZONING `"'' w` 24 T23N R4E E 1/2 F,,,TO 01n6/9e il � �\ N1€- 44 5€G 4 W�.� , C7 -�,W . �I \ �n lid \ - -- 1 aim bbbb Ffin the se=darn WATER MF1 i e e i moo=°oM e 6 F- \ SYMBOL-5 TOP o°' ✓j _ 5w 10 TR OIL'WATER SEPERATOR BLOW OFF V' VE VALVE 11.22 _ J ,/ ❑ CATCH BASIN fr- O W6 ER MOLE -- t WATER MANnALE -- 6 SIGNAL.GANNET �f -•�S\ Fee nroRAxr -- -� l� \GATE VALVE dX(j I zBATY /�ELECTRIC PDX 2 Q/\ a • BLOW OFF VALVE naOMtD - eaPn^t� I d �J O OAGO4W.GRADE ELEVATIONS �` �r"O" �I�'/ w \ ♦a (SPOT ELEVATIONS) a P lot / Pisef ersr��o / 1� ]a .�._ .. DRM1ERreAD ENSTre SECONDARY RO Be BY OvE 5 LGM POLE 11 .---.,-- MARACA. �-• _'- V� 9 F 10'&1rtD4YG NED POPE.: THE 6116.BE 111 I I R . \ 8 WATER METER 4\\ L �¢ys� LLJ \ O51 DeECTION OF SLOPE .' �i 1�i -1�� es.Nt=pET'51,06 !' '. -/'_� / ` SE"f9PGK - t __POPE.: - \/ ` fi.� -,...'0 Z�'.• p .ra--------- •• • 1�";.`. ,�' 'T1yy Ntt D?.a t°.q 1� uNE TO REMAIN I I ,°- Qz°•rI .--,,,-.2-,,,,,,,..„.„:„.......,,,,.,,,, i Sxt71 e I� o ``�?I• n.,x... a'•dri'►!!ri► , © ,nNDyc S Lu ��' �� / J\ ��1Ri �'1/ 5P1Ro yp Vy • �q �•1LLI�Iltyn'o , • f`a___------= // / - - .- '`*i'er6r: v e w+ i, t- „ui -%-r�''' FWI xsa�� ,� `�- // ;c` f �r Y17w,.a � ice.-"` `,- d,<� •i \ //a( / / i/'"„n� p . �, �'v,i,�Q • �I_ �Sl �.+ k • �.I . \\y °5w� 1 ro.x� �.,.�,on x \ / ..--. oed •Ate"-' P•' sue, Fw'� •, S \ ;r�iro'�' 1,•VJr-y vik.,...44, ,�,. 77 " is��5$� � iii ox�''P k .61° - \ /'' LB �, [ W^-=`=..-..- F�.Y 4�/ f , � ry rl 10' T£E'< FER(PAST SECTIONS \ : .-. •, ytb 5t.., OTC ,.- �T / T Y �,,!;. �`'`•'s!' g . •%% p0 WPC SITE PLAN NOTES o�c r 1. Intlicates bull0ing Doti the 9V 'Pa! -",-'� w 2. LIAnt pole < k � oilitk , PR 5 '.'� •ceC.Fi 3. Tank farm. Q ks is• �x 4. Trash Enclosure O i yp „.'(���5�j5y - �i�/I •w lwnoSCPPe: r yec l.., 5. CanAPY and gas Pump Iacat l0n . 5. Mln. atllus 2•at ourb unless Olb¢rwlse lnelcatea. Ce Ce �,,���y�y�K\ Ilk //�/ 7. En terpr tse street signage - ;jl o\ B. Nev CAIRN. nyW 9. Existing contours 1110, /Ili 1B. Chevron street slBnaAe vo � / SITE PLAN INFORMATION e5 r ' FROM TO'TO 1. total square footage of the s' 2.T4 Acres tt9354 s9.l t. 1. Parking Prepose0: IIII` Convenience Store/Gas Station parking: 9-9'-0'standard stalls gp•gtzq,pey 2_ vetland square for, B sq.ft. Total Convenience Store/Gas Station 1-parking stalls cao stall Revlsias Pp 'S, SETB'K - parking: 10 Park nA stalls proposed \ , 9 3. Landscaping square footage' M.,Dote p¢spipti0n •/b' 0`� \ Natural Landscaping for wildlife. 2960 s5.it.((24.of site) sit Enterprise Car Rental/Sales'(w/o expansion) 48-9'-0'standard stalls Yalnta lned Landscape area: 23013 o.it (19.32 of site)) 34-9'-9'dbl parked stalls Total square footage of Landscaping: 29683 sq.it.124.6z of site) 10-23.-0'parallel stalls 64-6'-6-compact stalls ry <Ai. • 4. But)drop square footage: . 2 -12-0'handicap stalls M Convenience Store/ds Statlon building: 1305 sq.1t. Total Prapgse0 parklnB:(r/o expansion) 168 parklnA stalls proposed { Enterprise Car Dental/Car Sales putldinAi 5250 ap.it.ESI6T4VG POWER LATE y Enterprise Future Expansion, 4480 so It Enterprise proposed parking.(r/expansion) 46-9'-0'standard stalIs Total building square footage' 1035 sq.it.0.32 of site) 34-9'-0'dot parked stalls 10-23'-0'parallel stalls �/ 5. Pavement square footage' 44-0'-8'compact stalls \ Exlstive enpervtous Surfacesi0 sq.it. 2 -f2-B'handlca0 stalls r * New Pavement: - 74415 sq.it. Total Proposed parking:(rl expansion) 148 parking stalls proposed g \ New Sld¢ralk: 4161 spit. .__ - r- Ne -�B TMVRuie uu Ffdhry Diu iu n. WA- PONTA RELOCATIO Total Impervious Surfaces' 89751 sq.it.175.22 of site) 9. Proposed building tie)Ant' Project Director P�rovet By 10. Building setbacks required by code' �'-B' m 6. Parking Requirements: 11. Proposed building setbacks' p Convenience store/Gas Station: 5 stalls/1000 sq.it.of building 12. Current zoning' CO-COYkRCIAL OFFICE Project Arnhem [necked By r 5(1305 saa.It./1E001-6.53(71 13. Proposed zoning: lid-I40IIb4'MISTRIAL 56 Enterprise Car Rental/Car Sales: 1 stall/`�A0 svv.it.of site 14. Construction type' ' Jon Captain Pe B 119354 sls/IP:0 sq ft.of building .Pq SITE PLAN 41) Enterprise Office required parking: 119 stalls/t00a sq.lt. i bm ld ing Pro% �. Drawing u I- 40'gF PRM 5 Z2X341 4.5(525/6 sq.lt./10g61"03.63(24) i Enterprise Future Expansion parking' 4.5 stalls/1002 sq.lt.of but lai)g 17080 51400 sq.it./10001-20.16(21) A 1•1 ER�Dr�A� Total Darking required'(r/0¢xpdns lgnl 15 parking stalls required �tE a N1• total parking required:(rl expansion) /6 parking stalls required 8-24-ie t) • • Ue U co0.1 1 JAMIE PIERRE GRADY WAY OAKESDALE E ow 6 _a 30 - aw REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL DRAWINGS OQ ¢0 80 IN SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 4 EAST W.M. Q3 = zo N a0 > CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 o UTILITY GRID 4324 N.E. 1/4 PRE-APPLICATION FILE #98-024 z I w O H �-, American Engineering Corporation 00 tE -- Engineers • Planners • Surveyors = — F $ SITE LOCATION: 4032 148th Ave.N.E.Redmond,WA 98052••PHONE(206)881-7430 Fax(206)881-7731 — PROJECT INFORMATION: >'z a i E"'W 8a ux �€ EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) N.E. CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF 'E SW GRADY WAY AND OAKESDALE AVE. S.W. PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IM (MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL) RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2.74 ACRES 4 9I '& TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 0 S.F. OWNER: SW TNS7 TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 91.040 S.F. 6 0col JAMIE PIERRE / SITE DETENTION OF STORMWATER: DETENTION NOT REQUIRED. s `.d/ i 11525 LAKE CITY WAY NE ® DETENTION PROVIDED DOWNSTREAM. SEATTLE, WA 98125 TREATMENT FOR WATER QUALITY: BIOFILTRATION SWALE PHONE/) (206) 364-2200 6 ill FIRE DISTRICT: CITY OF RENTON, FIRE DEPTPARTMENT a 3,3 • o GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY SERVICES BENCHMARK ST ELECTRICITY: PUGET SOUND ENERGY SERVICES w, sw— °'". �yY '6't SEWER: CITY OF RENTON <� sW WATER: CITY OF RENTON ONSITE: SE PROPERTY CORNER 0 GRADY WAY. ELEV. = 20.28 \INIIpitsY - - h OFFSITE: TOP CENTER BOLT FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED 20 FEET NORTH, OS -- -E-i-1 I-1 =-53 FEET-EAST-OF-SE CORNER-OF 900 POPLAR-PL.-ELEV-= 20.89 --- -- P° -- -- --- ss. 0 16m sT VD PROJECT ARCHITECT SO 0 INDEX OF SHEETS I THE DYKEMAN ARCHITECTS, INC 1716 W. MARINE VIEW DRIVE •r_ A EVERETT, WA 98201-2087 -� PHONE/ (425) 259-3161 CONTACT: MIKE BARTHOL ' SHEET C COVER SHEET SHEET 1 COMPOSITE UTILITY SITE PLAN PROJECT COORDINATOR m SHEET 2 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN sW 23R°®-- AEET 3 FINISR-ED GRADING, PAVEMENT AND CURBING PLAN VICKI MORRIS CONSULTING SERVICES SHEET 4 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 7732 18TH AVENUE NE 111111111../A11111. 5 SEATTLE, WA 98115-4426 SHEET 5 STORM DRAINAGE PROFILE PHONE# (206) 522-8057 SHEET 6 STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET 7 WATER SYSTEM PLAN, NOTES AND DETAILS VICINITY MAP SHEET 8 WATER SYSTEM DETAILS SHEET 9 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN NTS SHEET 10 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROFILES, NOTES AND DETAILS SHEET 11 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS - -1 -----2- A—NNNNAA • • LEGEND " �..._ TREESA.._..... - CRAMER- • COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE RANTING NOTES F , , , TNMAMCP.TAND.TA „ °,° i MAR° M N PRIOR E K°R EE�N ALL OW. I';.,yjv • •,O Nv¢.,nsLLN ,Ac,w CwcnL,TwTuwYgr , I I ENCOUNTERED EOCONTRACTOR IS TOPOMPT2 CONTRACTOR SNAIL USE.ITTION WHILE LYN ADVISE ATENO TGEERRA.L CONTRACTOR AND O AVOID DISTUDEING ANT OWNED OF �.,. I~.N •). IRONED(LOCATION SERVICE PNOE lea-,xsSss) •-i!(•dw::. SD CONTRACTOR NULL s; wuERw m FIN.INSPECTIONa ro DESIGN C( scLri r AUEM/NOEE.TEH w..WE ARE°�R W ° a J_ . SHRUBS ueEZENIgEPOCOMu �s F09012 PUNT UNE°LREAN°MINIMUM PLANTING DISTONOEeAS SPECIFIED BELOW IN THESE NOTES \\\\\ONN1.2191.11.3321 MUMS.n« wN 5 GROUND COVERS NOLL BE FUNNED IN AN ® wwNN°..,M ER.N,,.I,NATA „ ,.a °swNNONTEPUN OR IN`°`AT'E"D`EPTRIANGULAR nw AARe9ACwlERPeGROUND E r U4 Bi MINIMUM• .DEP N MN ERM X TOP 3°,L NALLP4N N°BEDS s ® Pavn°E.,uuR,L GROUND COVERS sou v MImMOMSOEPmw°REAMIX TOPSOIL:INUAuvm snEAs. -It d • wwwNw D.C. mow.a 6 ,e R l� E M MIMUM� X R ° a ��Ea Ei - d' i aJ8 / \ AUMEDS RECOMMENO.ADON9 ° I i 9V C„]E�USNN ° E o .a 0 �r_, / — �5, M,NNL°°E°RM°.2.3.N STA ° WEST )\f w° R�°Mo w a ,w N� ��� r� x,� SO TION••Aoa and hew.1l SeLE0N0S00sh•00 °5E,.w.,.,,wN�.m. ....P...w...,P ! �. ...,.n.Ta,.a,a,...N.d.,well*et an°a..• mlww,.°k ,T°PN.LO3•••••I ,� .a.rx /�v� i— — y • h e's a systemAlPw a ahardy.M.N,.E�...a....Meta .. -------\\ - - - -- ;I �T IJ `, .i/ , 9I, Nu° °w..Iew...�L..NLV..a....I.,..w..4N0.Damon on.,, ; - S • \_--y .w� �'�i res n' a inn \� fg • \ __ -� .i"p.�T'`"uQ0� �ti 95�°w ?, -►e� ,cn I°"" i "� EOU ,A4T°°�O STANDARD E°ATE NPAR PRACTICE°.�N:TAMA°RJR° AN°, z, • \ �'' / ` :`�:, (i 4 a'' 0. o� •• —.,rI TIE USED CD INKLEED INSTALLED ADJACENT TO CURES OD WALKS OMER 0E31. :;H,.T.'••:••.•. ``11fl '11:1= Nry LAWN °� ERAnwa AM WM/MON WILL BE COMPLETE°w,EN i.— �;lJ f F` A� ,aq u o° ��, �:�,;- „!,p EPSv MAO EwsnnGVEGETATIONONTNIesMETOPR -41 :,;1:7r: ,\ 't,.•� _---�_— Tar 1. , / p ,.,- i��'s E ,oA"T / - Ex?••i. / . Nil I/,\ Cl�, .>, ...„ ��� I— - i1.Q 'F:._'� db ^j"4pi1 .tC�,� Oe'h 69 o'iw l (^'��w — - - r .:.. .5 ♦, t o 0 F.. / re A------ .,, n — — Ep LANDSCAPE INFORMATION r'40 1. Total square footage of the site, 2.74 Acres•119354 sq.lt. • eMNmg SCAM \ 2. Total Landscaping required: aof site•23E17 sq.ft. eP • .. , • 3. Proposed Landscaping square footage: Natural Landscaping for MIIdIite, 6590 sq.ft.15.57 of site) Maintained Landscape area. UM sq.!1.(11.35 of site) Total square footage of Landscaping, 11(0a sq.ft.(244T of site) ' 1oft • • • 6 5I 1 il NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1.ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING AITH CITY OF RENT.DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR. 2.INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PADS AND MAINTAIN QS W THROUGHOUT PROJECT B 3 0 3.INSTALL SILT FENCING AS REWIRED. g LU Z 4.BEGIN GRADING.REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 4000 CY. D y Q O CL 5.MIDDS�TARY S EWCERROSYSSMTOE%ISTINC DRAINAGE RATER S ® 6.VERIFY KING COUNTY DNR/WTP APPROVAL OF SYSTEM CONNECTION THEN NAVE CONTRACTOR OBTAIN METRO APPROVAL 9 d Q I(n - OF CONNECTOR PRIOR TO PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. Q�' I - 7.BEGIN CONSTRUCTOR OF BUILDINGS A- J NOTE` H I 8 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND CONTACT PUGET SOUND ENERGY \ I THE NEAREST AVAILABLE NATURAL GAS FOR ELECTRICAL AND NATURAL GAS SERVILE CONNECTIONS AND ��/ - DISTRIBUTION(2'I)LIMN IS LOCATED IN 14EIER LOCATIONS W ///-1 POWELL AVENUE SW APPROXIMATELY 500 FT _I I- \ /- NORTH OF SW GRADY WAY. 9.UPON COMPLETION OF UTUTY CONNECTIONS FINISH SITE WORK g N WL O \ / /".L. -' WITH ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION AND PAVEMENT SUB GRADE PREPARATION. ZCC 0- EOSINC CIE/OF RENTON __i I 10.KEEP ADJAECENT STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TINES. q Q a O SSMRA 4324911 I _/I' COVERED VEHICLE y,�•H I I _ i II.CONSTRUCT WATER QUALITY SWALES AND ESTABLISH VEGETATION pN W LI, U \ WASHING BAY I / _ I / AT EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE. g Z- WATER MH OIL/WA SEPERATOR/2 uc eNllmn¢ - O E \ \ SEATTLE METPO SSUH loo i]OJ WTTH EX RIOR / I \��'- 12.COMPLETE FINISHED GRADING.INSTALL PAVEMENT. 40 W< Pw=13.52 OP or SHUTOFF VALVE CONNEC / /-- \ i IN E.1'"rpuC 1 AL� I 22 SANITAR SEINE >' — i 1},CONSTRUCT WRBINC AND lANOSCAPING. K WY=1.0'-4GUi S.t]"LUNL) __`�i f 7, _ \ $EAITLE METP.0 SSNH �� / / _ 14 OBTAIN OCCUPANCY AND UTILITY PERMITS. a.i \ RIVE lLEIA I LID _ ; ""J j'= - ' _I. 15.CLEAN ALL DEBRIS FROM STE =N0 ACCESS _ /// GI z Ili I \ ADJUST RIM TO 6'/� - _ �'� \yL / ,'a, a \ \ OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM AND r- ----m"6." '�4a i;--- S -- — \Pl. HOURS OF OPERATION _ H w n' CONNECT TO KING COUNT48-0 -, `• � F :• — I WITHIN NORMAL CITY OF RENTON CWSTRUCTON ECURS \ METRO SEWER,SET NEW 48" •• 1 _ IN 6...)14 m` \ SSMH.INSTALL FIAP vALVE BETWEEN.� 1 �� / - I "/ LIKELY BETWEEN):OpAM-8.00 PM.UNLESS SPECIFIC PERMISSON ?E METRO AND RI STO SSNHT1 �5t6 M1 . E 1\ — I$GRANTED BY THE CITY OF RENTON INSPECTOR. [ OBTAIN CITY AND METRO E-E'JA.^._\ m E \ APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION �� ,�.� `• TELE4• N M£ R 1 \I °c_u \ Flit'yr: II �T NA` LAb RV �„ DUST,MUD,NOISE MITIGATION \ _ ire-." _,a ` //may y�O�D 7� E� 4",, �/ / IF GRADING AND COMPACTION ACTIVITIES CREATE UNACCEPTABLE Q yi a.0 \ _ - - .- j t ENTERPRISE CAR i ce'" -'_ LEVELS Or DUST.THE GROUND TALL DE NETTED FOR DUST / _ 1 1 R.Tm A•+CY 2�,�� -.1 �' CONTROLKO CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ENTRANCE/EXIT WITH THE INSTALLATION OF _ :•��y' 1"1 ROCK NEEDED CONSTRUCTION CTION NOISE RI PAD AND DAILY CLEANING. f / F t j 1<PRNRE PACEE (5250 50F _ i - � ����"�� � � f.• -- AS NEEDED CONSTRUCTION NOISE RILL BE INTERIM NORMAL / e 1 - - e /`� PARAMETERS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A COMNERLIAL SEE. � $�� "" WS1WG OVERHEAD POYRT // � =• ,A1 440 SO _ � '/ \ 1y Z _ "�� - G-' LINES TO BE PLACED/UN DR/Oti 1 .• NL ( ��� -:.. 0, a / o,o "-N$�' \ \ IN 10 FT AIDE EASPL�ENT�r/J� 1 \ �- - I/ 5 s•' ..,',T5• ' \�ib>� _- O \ \ L�e, R� /� �^ ^w As ox1 £w- $W,yE ice. -. PROPOSED HAULING/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ROUTES j' '--:. �II�?4�,rY1 \ .s(Fx) AR " �� c,,r.Ut+ / /n �p \ -- _ CWSTRUCTON ACCESS AND REINOVAL OF ANY UNSUITABLE MATERIAL 1 04i� E RwcEn1 ' Aeo`F W'1� j a\\` //�U IS PROPOSED VIA GRADY WAY.IT IS LIKELY THE UNSUITABLE y \ `; \ ♦ L•+j/ - •� '/" �\ iMAIERIAlt6)LLGRAVFL BE ULED EAST ON FOR PPE BEDONCPAVEMENTY WAY AND 111FN SOUTHtli - � � ? WA HWYg \ f. 9 • AND BUILDING MATERIALS RILL ALSO LIKELY BE BROUGHT FROM THE SOUTH VIA HAM 167 NORTH.AND THEN WEST VIA GRADY WAY. ga H ZG 1 I.019 1l'� ,1,�A��.� /��/ \� �� THE SOURCE OF MOST MATERIALS TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT STE ♦ ,~„ �'r Wp • • N¢y,PT3�A�A•(L,`:1I•111,)e� / / TALL LIKELY BE FROM THE SOUTH. 1C2� ; \' g.M/'' �3/'IRRIGATION DD-RI GA. ' 1 3• •• ' 1 `6 Sr / i•DOMES TE vgyav� ESTIMATED EARTHWORK _ \ . )• ��� ,►.Y A'y� E yf `-- / /�/ M/E 2•Hr+Man DIP T TEE GENERAL SITE LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR BUILDINGS. AND REOU RE APPROXIMATELY \ � t � _ i RANT _ / / �INITH CONNELTONNTO EXISTIEW FIRE NG MAIN 32W CY GRAVEL-SOIL BE IMPORTED AND A y AREN OF T 8 g9 TE EPHONE RIER` VVV / _ 335 Cr OF TOP SOIL TO BE IINPOR ED.ANY AREA OF THE - - •- 8- NAURAL GAS IA e ` ? �� WTM CITY. STE WHICH MALL NOT BE WORKED ON WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ite ELECTRICAL Pi R METER :✓\ � �`" , i '/ GRADING COMPLETION MUST BE HYDROSEEOED.TEMPORARY GRADIN C OF COMPLETION M)TALL BE MNNTNNED. PRO SED SIGN •\ "� t NM EXTERIOR SEPARATOR t1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES WITH EXTERIOR SHUTOFF \ I �iiuiil / s$p� SANITARY SEWER VALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING ONSITE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION LINES RUNNING EAST-WEST TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND SUMMER 1998. W OAp EXISTING NO TH-SOUTH TRANSMISSION LINES TO BE RELOCATED � �'i. $ OFF SITE SUMMER 1998.PROPOSED UTUTES L BE CONSTRUCTED SPRING 1999.PROPOSED PROPOSED AND ES TO NE TO O ]/4'DOMESTIC CONSTRUCTED SUMMER 1999.OCCUPANCY TARGETED FOR / WATER SERVICE METER AUGUST 1999. / RP DEVICE TO BE / / A INSTALLED BETWEEN SERVICE / METER AND BUILDING.CONNECTIONTE N ---- \ OFF R RENENTTINW.. • •\ GRAPHIC SCREE yy LEE' • t.+1 .' American Engineers • Planners • Surveyors i ,�II Engineering ., Corporation "�e6na6`" wnaa)651-T4b Fe•006)ent-TT310 Ie>ws_TOoR,o J — - _ 7-31-15 A-NNNNAA \\Kcd2\e\Petro\97036 -A4.dwg Wed Jul 29 16:22:59 1998 19'!' .'-O• 9.-6' 1 ]3S E_-_iii) m 0 == F r Ilie�n�l� r r ; D Z a. 0 Z • Zo x2mr-mcnIII[-moo e b , ll i t 1 V — I� ` b o go,13` C• o+ 11 © 11 ©©e S $I 00000I I A . ® CI EVRON FACLITY FOR FERRE Al GRADY WAY ADD OAK6OAIE ���_��°������g ��� L � a�� jj�l '� ���s p���8����RggB:z O O }i31° CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C. lii'�� illilliii� i '' i NEC SW GRADY WAY & OAKESDALE AVE SW �iat 4����i�6�°gB�� RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 de�°' i� e1 if • • EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES _- -s 1. 8'pre-colored(light grey)spilt face Db. e2 2. 8'pre-colored(dark grey)smooth face M. 3. 1'Insulated safety glass In clear anodized alumInim _ 0 0 storefront(rating. O 5. Indic tes f metal sign and downspout typ.(green) 5. Indicates future sign by Tenant 4�} --- ice I 8. Overhead door _ I I 7. 1'Insulated glass In clear anodized aluminum storefront • �rarx ',�9 IIIOf1L`�11�i=7l—_il—_'T'� ''7 n 0 6. Metal Roofing Teen)) 9. Facia IBter lei 4 reenl ® ' L. Clear anodized a rminae storefront door �la y •••r• �1 t : 1. S 12. Exterior metal door • L«IIL -sP� Ii• n I•A: ,-,,, IL.t 12. Exterior lighting ' =? _ i='' _ '? ^'a 51GNAGE CALCULATIONS (n y.. �M { A -•,...q. T_ •• ~, '^ 4 Facia Band slgns (3•-0•x 15'-8') Area•182 sq.ft. Q Zr 1 0 0 0 O O 2 Logo Sign(double sided) (3'-6'x 17'-6') Area•122.5 sq.ft. LLi Total sign sq.ft.• 302.5 sq.ft. SOUTH ELEVATION Y� I/e••I'-0'(FP P4T622•d4) ` Q i1 k II Ili 2 m I g -- �:s•s:. I I 1 alJ sx I � § v : m,u_T I I I 1 1 1 I i I , _ T T IIIIIIpII111111111II111111E111111111111111111111I1111IIIIIIIIx IPIIIIIII M11111111111111111111111pIIIII111111lliie 4)co° — ....i ar IY1 •wirm wmwIYmmiums1fS T ; k. ui g e�a O O b 0 �� J O b,- ■ Q z V O LAMP ELEVATIONS SIGN ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION I/8'-I'-0'(F PRNr 5 n'341 VW•r-0purr'(F PT 5 n'3 —49 1ll Q I/e•-r-0'(r MINT 5 z2.34-) d p ]L W 1 0 O nn0 O 0 0 P -- --r-7-�i Iso I IIIIAi��■ullital�_ g`°w- I j y glll�l�llll�,l�lll I III 1 II6 I Rayisns re.lzm tzmwm _ tr�� 2t� V +— I�uoirlllpho. ® ..r� nnl 19olillllillll 111119rlumlmi. .... o _ ranmli Im19111111III�IIIRlll9pl�rruz him ,,,,,,......_ M..4 ""iig i tzliiiii:S±MSI- 0.1— -,:. ■ s��',- rr: �■ri�'.�■■ 0774,a:.cal(awu iaamra tlkl:imuezi�lr" i:Mnraf31'§ s1ai W::o::v a�� s?ii!�i � 3Eie :2F9 :.�.$IE:t: 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 O Prow mecca 4pm2d By Bout ArtMECI amen By 2 EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION rzG SCALE ,m a I/Er-1*-0*(F)RN7 5 n•34'f lief-I'-0-(F FRNT 5 n•341 4 0 2 4 9 12 J'p }9a •i•• Rawl No. tamag Mx Y ve•-ro• vloeo A3.1 i A 31 0 1 mm -- x i-Oi lB- 1 S EXTERIOR COLOR LEGEND Yam'No: Dna QEVRau'FOOD HART I.yy O OMR09RBAYbY4W F" ....::".,:"::':':.: :: 2 raaw DNZB/.Y kr-aW .c�sw.m�a�mm.m `4 * •�d'r•'' .v" ':�Y..+J.€xt4•Ftd:Y.r" :Fl#rF� 7fi •..r,�,:''+WCcr/Y.Fri.. ie'.vS.rX.ai+. •3`r�x'-".�lt/ oM�,...a,.o�.D.a.. . . 0o ar . ; oau al-ma n .. _ • O RSinG®Acx I:cur.�wwuaw w����..w�v.m:Uuw,wwa�a. �..�•u.wow .awnanawwu�.��wvaw--r•,., 0a•orcx aw mazes,mazes,tar w M30eE lecus o V ° \\ \\ \\ \\ 5. races rums ez) s 5111.0 §• Yi .''a. .l 4 t,14¢: ,r .,�'',f Y ay;IFA •"`'+• <>snr<n NOTES il, O511Ya0 LRJ61aM1®1.19 MfL61BU.9Y11ff MIt0 NO PM Il9TaUY 1.O11.NOA90I011R5 100Mmp#ar 00.1V0!®NO91.111.. O Co 9 CAM.NOEAST-ELEVATION WE PP RD �Y � �� �a �'a SCALE 1/4=1'-0' &RIO riurveSIelIS Q J J e INA4PORB610i91 1LM6l Yf11116OF1:18 to<Z }— ENO / 0PfEi6® 1L l Aa F Y Z O ,n I r1rrtMAT GAZING CALCULATIONSQ ONS MI jO1 p 5O IVS HIT? LmN.aAD6N5A MUM OFEOM GCFD(IQ .. .. ... .- ... O ®Acx �brl9COR/4A fpgMO911CJ 1.1.N. _ Co 23m — rz = 9.11 ,� o Z<Z f J CSC LL15 /7 0 Z ° W ¢p a. 4* f',.a"rA w - '.era l xy x a.! z,41 $ , Q3 -gr4!;=** c !'v F2 e i. r 4`** ;14.1° lQL O co 0O ST1.a W A/.91.EVI. 6 Z NORTHWEST ELEVATION (SOUTHWEST ELEV. SIM) m SCALE 1/4'=1'-0' id ---- - - RO - -- -- - - - -- - - ----- - 1n - COLE ®... CU v...� - - 0 I V/1NT: c-sro, ...... -J .. ... .. ..... .. Q a PBfYPA�ALx ELEVATIONS Duc 0/6/98 NV.Mr 038-1 01 3 p Deigned I 9'0111e0 In 0-1 © S11 Stnp Q .LirS y {4 "{g rf 1 4q.+ f't, 3tr:Z' �rn O 5,“o W ' '` u, x � t $ : ,4Rs' / G O STY 1 MOLE VI. 1 LT Sheet NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION SIM) N a SCALE 1/4-=1'-0. ]C i _d_ 1\Kcd2\e\Petro\97038\jA2.dwg Wed Jul 29 16:22.19 1998 g 444444 A s fl ,, "\NIZ ` aAi O \ \ 1).--:: ,',.• li ..:. S. i ..,.. A t4i u 0 8 O x o , C) w O o m ; 9. r � m 2 m a G) am m � D Z v 0 • m 0 AO u X o 13 d Z Q '.. o O I S L a, g �,. 4 r, `•` p .. „.... , 8 e i It. c O1 I tIN , / \ „ '' .\%, s O ���; ;> 1,1:§4 ,,, ^\ P� • 1 1 1 11 I S • 1 Fa CI-EVRON FACLITY FOR PRE AT GRADY WAY AT OAKSDALE 1111a11��� g 1� R. r 'rill 114.4111 deg�e�lW��las g�:pi ��I' CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C. ,�ftrilili�eilliiiii m G� i 1 NEC SW GRADY WAY 8 OAKESDALE AVE SW :eo11.13 1T B o� RENTON, WASHINGTON . "1g'' id, gl 1 • gi ND= NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CIF MODE ROLLS on g'\a 4 gN USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH , FABRIC TO WIRE. 2'BY 2.14 GA.MARE I. Use fair' 'to R'guaraspSAO or orusned rock for surlaomg as shown. E I�N FABRIC OR EOUIV. Material wiM'foes la t acceptable. 0)Z Q F 1 2. The 10p'minimum length snail be 1<nggTh<Ted as necessary to insure 3 C] DROP INLET 0001 GRA S,R•_Y<. I material Is not backed Into lM1e pubic riglll-ol-way. QQ W OJ 2.IO. z`l,[_"'&r. R/WN. ,_ CC �B ry_� twit. STAKE 'Feie�.XX'�ill STAKES ik 4O Z Z 5-0' �i uURY BOTTNM OF LiABRIG� EXISDNC GROUND O® ALTER FABRIC I AIER 1 B'B ENCN Pi n 9 (n U Y-6. 12. 'b 6'MA% B a¢ z I- I I ......-s......_�_,. sits...'- 3 w O II4 ••:I�' .B WASHED GRAV EL Z ec }Q FILTERED WATER FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL + o Q Q Z RUNOFT WATER 6' EXISDNG GROUND LL(0 „W W1H SEDIMENT 2'BY 2'BY 14 GA WARE Lail FABRIC OF EOUIV. _ IOC MW. d (MAY BE REDUCED TO 50'MIN 2'-0' FOR SITES WITH LESS THAN 1 D Nre W N __ ACRE OF EXPOSED solo F- 12' _ 5'-0' O W < • _4._R4.4.4_4_.w.w4_44..4wRee.4A.4_._ • 7> PROVIDE]/1'-1.5' R-25'MIN •It's.•• ... ..w. •.vii ::+,� Oi OOODDD�•�.4DD�.S�.D�.DD'•DDD�.4�....�< LL Z I WASHED GRAVEL BACKFILL 12 ¢ �cl.` IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES d DJ, ¢ OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON B'MIN. THE SURFACE 15'MIN - `-1 911111. •a o Ley, BURIED FILTER FABRIC 2-BY♦.WOOD POST EC e• TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ALT:STEEL FENCE POSTS. NOTFy ALTER FABRIC BRUSH BARRIER - g o w EXISTING DRIVEWAY SIRS _®p�m.` NOTES: NTS PI 4N RAMP OR SITE ACCESS �' EXTEND THE FILTER FENCE/YORE MESH BEYOND THE INLET OPENING 1.FOR SHEET RUNOFF OR FOLLOWING DISCHARGE FROM A N,S ROAD art I. AT LEAST 18'ON ALL SIDES. SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. ,W,DAM�s/se (zaz .- PLACE 3/4'TO 3'GRAVEL OVER THE ALTER FABRIC/WIRE MESH. NE DEPTH OF GRAVEL OE. ;E 2 IFHOULD BE AT LEAST 12.OVER FILTER BECOMES CLOGGED ENTIRE WIDI SEINLET OIMENT,THE GRAVEL MUST BE PULLED 2 MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS PERPENDICULAR TO FENCE II DWG.NAME BR23 SP PAGE BO68 E. u$ AWAY FROM NE INLET MID CLEANED OR REPLACED LWE IS Ill. DATE RECS. BY MvPR'� 'F'Z. u 3. AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WOULD BE TO USE NE CLOGGED GRAVEL AS FILL AND PUT „F„I[Ta a, FRESH GRAVEL AROUND THE INLET. 3.MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO tl U a w` NE FENCE OF 100 FT A V€ 4.IF 50X OR LESS OF THE SOIL BY WEIGHT.IS ARE PARTICLES g m E SMALLER DIAN DIE U.S.STANDARD NEW NO.200,THE COS SHOULD BE EQUAL TO OR SMALLER THAN THE SEW SIZE TESC NOTES 14+ THAT BSX OF THE SOIL CAN PASS THROUGH. AIII 11 Ig RI 5 THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 3/4'MINIMUM 1.BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OCCURS.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION Ta FILTER FABRIC FENCE DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL MEETING MUST BE HELD WITH THE CT OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,DESIGN MET BARRIER ENGINEER. ��! 5 FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE T� ®®,� SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE,BUT NOT BEFORE NE 2.All lunrta of a ALCOA ana areas of vegetation prea<rwtlon as preacrtea on �©' UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. The pion sM1OII be clearly eogged.,N,,Rdd and observed During conaW<tion. ;E Q et4mID Hum �� DATE REVssgN WVR I •.. i 2 .DAM12/De 6.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY 3.All required sedmentolion/erosion control facilities must be consWcted and Y pAFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL N operation prior to land<tearing and/or abler construction n to insure that DWG.NAME BR-2TA SP PAGE 8069.1 PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADELOFTED.... � s.Ent Wen water does not enter Me natural drainage system. All erosion IMMEDIATELY. and sedunenl focdPea Moll be maintained in acsatisfactory condition unto - MMsuch time that clearing and/or co traction Is ompieted and potential for on site erosion M1as passed. The implementation,maintenance,replacement and €� L J l rm sz/sa additions to DEO3i0l/sedimentation control systems shall De the responsibility e!6p DATE REASON F tSIPR"q DWG.NAME BR21 SP PAGE BOBS 0l the pertnitlee. kvY __ 4.The erosion and sedimentation control systems depicted on this drawing are 1 '�� Z MNNTAiIV>dJ-U.L i III L�/' ' 1 intended to be min.um requirements to et anticipated site conditions. As I I w'on EXiSTINC FILTER -- _ / construction progresses an unesDecled or seasonal conddlons dictate.the \\ r mvm i�_��T \ /�\ pomlllee shall anticipate That more erosion and sedimentation control (� �. FABRIC FENCE i/ \ VI,\�` facilities will be necessary to Insure complete siltation control on the SHE SIB N /........1 proposed site. burin the course of construction,it snail be Me atilt t" -JQJ —�A������ R WAY DS F:'• rr / 0 9 ga Ion and re:yanalbaly of the pemniuee to address any new conditions that may be ,_ ., a+2.aw _ _-_„_- C _� - —r X sleeted by his octiNti<s and to provide vaaltianal lacmbes.over and above L1. �;� -'= - I. --- -1- --Fn----__ minimum requirements.as may be needed to protect adjacent properties and water Mai 9p I GRApwL SHALL® on%' 1r: & L ocp Y SEE �AWDri I TI].1 UNDL PROP•a• - \•. I jI f rD / 3 IfeagrN , eet,that are to D r•.W_-SFTCWORK I MA CH RIM/L10 • l - -' \L loan twelve(12)hours,shall be catered by mulch.sodding,or plastic covering. L �i Tea I I PROPOSED RFT Te L'� 0 aim ISHED GRADE many Z.In on which M1as been stripped of elation and where further a p1 DDwork --�i1,i��T�— - - -- I 1 I I I is ontidyated fora period of 30 days o or,all disturbed eras must be D I 1\/1@ �s ���1-�� � ",r...1`, �_'� I ...lately stablize with mulching,gross planting or other approved erasion =� tt 1V �fi�, —•��D _ �1 -" F —^y control treatment applicable to the time of year In question. Gass seeding !�1�I 4��` ��_ ,B r��� t �W�� 1 alone will be Seeding may roc during the,when of It is in i September I Z .G{- 3(FX ���II.r®� [[[ —4I permute Seeding may augmented however,whenever it is in the merest al the Y MICI \' permiltee.but must De wgmenled with mulching.netting,or other treatment v C 1�� / r•- we C 5 PROTECT - -l�� • approved by the City of Renton outside the specified time period W \ 111:4, K.,,,, MANHOLES• , ,Illtrilkf !1 - B-Fx-Wt'eroslan/sedimm[Dti Vd ponds where the dead storage depth ° � N1AHNlFT— ,� V exceeds 6 IncM1n.a Ience,a mNimum o1 3 feet nlgM1 iz required,wth 3:1 side sF_ BARRIER slopes I' ' \ I { 9.A temporary gravel emaWction entrance.24's 50'a 8'of L-to 6-kiI .REPO• 1 �, ihI I"` �_a.- - quvrry syMa shall be located al all points of vehicular ingress and egress to n UTILITIES NE �' G _ "'- p_�.P.uI T- V I the construction site. __ -Y UTILITIES ro, UNDL SITEW K ` ,-'—'-' _ �,,CgAPLETE ♦ - — _ I — --- - \, rm r -.mac• / IEI.sP---Comm. Ea' gW ORADY WAY• coNsmucnoN _-__ --- = . M:.. American Engineers .A Planners Surveyors qi�• ENTRANCEI , Engineering v 3•a;�ma wA f PROTECT NEW STORM 15 SH>�T. -- , I Corp Oration fie` 1DRAINACE FA D • e ——T _ 'UT ENS RINEG@AiEICRITOR- , E COW ml-TwW rat noel eel-nI] _ ---� . --�--mess 10� • I 7-I31- —t A—NNNNAA o dJ NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N RGE. 4 E W.M. y > ""�, . "°' E ch E.MIN a z� I Mx.Mx wHs (TIP) 0 I n 1/2- Z Al sOEWA1x Ax0 TFRNATE I STRIP /� a cnEmExnoiL�xoraEE 1B" o IaP ¢Z¢ 6• EXPANSION JOINT ¢ CC U J 1/2•Ra(M) adi�5.` CURB AND:TIER SHOWN SEE DETAIL"A" 6 a> d 5" \C HOWEVER,OTHER CURBS d Q 1 R -per .4 MAY BE USED. Q; C7 CONCRETE SWALE W/ d' ZQ Q Z FlBERMESH • REINFORCING PAVEMENT IN a 00FT./FT. E`> /`"^ `6w (SEE STANDARD PLANS) SECTION A-A dK K Q 1/ MIN ^� ®�� A / w(� d 1 1 2 MA% TOP OF CURB •� III 2 JOINT 3/16'SCORE LINE `c N I CD Z. AT APPROAC •o - ¢ ALTFRNATE 7 O cc (n 1O ^ CEMENT CONCRETE ,,, "-..,.. a LZi. SIDEWALK D WMIMa TsITA B WPµ TOHc -I kr B w 1Ha MU MPT A CM A GUTRR DETAIL A z W ta' 7 1 2' _ crol. M(RIµ APpRo APPROACH WT1H f:,i 1-6 DOIEi AWES(�) MONOLITHIC CURB Li- w JOINTS HSHALL 1E ISM®NOT TO EKED)IS.BE 2 1/R LESS THAN ICE c/c WI SHALL e SEE NOTE 5 - Cc HOT BE LESS THAT. BE•Ti 5D NOT T AND SNAIL e[x-1/a•DES. 4 •NOTE:TOP OF LIP AT DRIVEWAYS. Tyr INAu BM IN 4 TO BE RUC. NY AT DO mow(BENNO CURB)Or OAO1. a CEMENT CONCE1E APPROACH FOR SHALL BE CLASS 3.003 ENTRAINED DRIVEWAYS AND AIMS o n • S CONCRETE BE LEANED AND EDGED mrOv®In bl B BE MIRED INTEGRAL xM CURB AND CUTTER BUT MAY BE POURED pz , CONCRETE SWALE R CEMENT CONCRETE BARRIER CURB y CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CURS(SEE OABLO AB mum. •,. �...AL. E- O O9 MS-GAS PUMP AND O NTS-INSTALL WHERE SURFACE U NTS-INSTALL WHERE SURFACE FLOW T WOW W APPROACH GEMMEL.u a ICE WIDE THE RRTx N IIHE DRVEEAY/ II�� Jf ›Z. = TANK FARM FLOW IS DIRECTED AWAY IS DIRECTED AT FACE OF ALLEY WIDTH DATE ROBS. V W PRM DWG.NAME FROIN SP PAGE FOOD E W 0- \ ISLAND PERIMETER FROM FACE OF CURB r- ... CURB I • - I E PRDAI. I a U a€ \\ STUTTE METRO SS. _ WATER ap i - I \\ ✓' /-' [ mE - SEATTLE( TTOP OP DF4 .nmo°.n A INN=z.ox(oDr s, 2'tout) VALVE I.-- All. 11 f-J/ 3•COMPACTEDAROLLED DEPTH YI -� \ 5XX- ___�'�/ i _ i _- ~C1ASS B ASPHALT m \ Y A M SE iTLE METRO SSMH _--___- �= - 0:0=10 we LID 1--- -p 3'COMPACTED/ROLLED DEPTH \ RN=tn O2 / �' �—CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE m wAPwc u-aY !MAN 0 ACCESS _ -- / _ \it,: !3 \ G ADJJST RIM TO /® 6�i@n� i ¢p z \ Y a® EL=1600 rR•x - d j .ao <•jppp°� _ I Y i�r m _ �—CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE iC 7. CI )���., u� 1T �'.\1t / __ -HIC K.-Y\ N ��CSV�' SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 957.$ fq (LL ......, _.^r'• -" OWs- L I&1 I �,\ �JgUT EwDiWG /. e/ MAXIMUM DENSITY.IF COMPACTION 6� w \ _ —.I""S I �s m ��', r GRATE ELEVATIONS CAN NOT MATERIALB MAY,REDDITION ED. PROP905EQ .clr[� ''tBB ENTERPRIS CAR _b n�� '�r:� A••— �/_ ='T•�_ /// tt PROPOSED (sw.rNcv �' +�WM � D ON SITE PAVEMENT / •M1A7 T-1 S im i ,k;)r 9 NTS N C \ t. s 9 g�/ gg 9p TOP OF EyAT1CYyN33%.AI.Y__/ 0 1 ��n do(y t `/' _ i I i(-S f'\\ \\ \\ TO APP EN�EL U_�i �I�`wi., ``• �2 �� S� ¢. / ^_\ \\ y \ .A_ -� �f� �_� 3 O I+ +// �� \ USE 2:1 SID SLOPE G �,�'i � i T 0.5A ,Y S' .� �/ ASMLPO SW,• •'P i ii 67 //� CONSTRUCT a,_•IG RETE T,��1 r`, '73- • ,.'_14% ./� BREAK IN CURB FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE ROW.CONSTRUCT 3'ME 12'DEEP ROCKED SPILLWAY TO E• 4,l�lis EET ✓• X \ _ •\ O /E%ISTNGBOTTOM OF WATER WAIT,SWALE. VALI AS INgCATED ! 4J /� 'j SORIM ANDUSE 2'TO 4'OUARRY SPALLS.\ '`e! R �� GRATEELEVANDNSE\41 .___:--,............. „ �/ X,F1.• CONSTRUCT CEMENT CONCRETE 4 \ \ I / a',O�\��� i/' SEE WIDTH DRIVEWAY EAS INOAPPROACH OCA IDS S EETN� American EAvm..Ta PIDxx.n sBTN.YR.a / �• � ¢5 - Engineering auw^qHE Al��'I Corporation 'i 11 ' CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY SL B nJ1 T LONCREIE SWALE MOUND PERIMETER / IA OF PUMP,ISLAND111 CONCRETE SLAB vxaxE(rm)m1-raw F•.me)en —� COVCRETELSWALESTO DRAIN TOSLOP llama `�—I OSM_ 3_ ��'_ ,/ gL/W'ATER-SLTa-ARATOR '-31-98 A—N N N N A A • 9-5- NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,ROE. 4 E ,W.M. E Ico -- 9 z_, <w DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOTES —�yd p z STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION NOTES RIM INV NOTES > OWS g, PIPE INC.5106-S(OR EQUAL) 17.3 74.3(6") CONNECT TO 4 0® a_ VEHICLE LOAD ACCESS HATCHES SANITARY SEWER 9 a r W PIPE INC.5106-S(OR EQUAL) CONNECT TO 3 G OWS#2 VEHICLE LOAD ACCESS HATCHES 18.3 T6'3(6") SANITARY SEWER STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES z} CONNECT TO AND SET LEEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OCCURS,A pQ ¢ CB#1 TYPE II 48'0 16.2 10.5 PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE WELD MN TIE CITY OF d K Q _ STRUCTURE AGAINST EX SD VAULT RENTON PLAN RENEWER. 0 CB#2 TYPE II 48.0 17.3 12.1 2All construction shall be m accordance with the'1994 Standard Specifications for Road,~ I Americ n Public and WorksMunicipal Assocciationn(APWA).as amended bW the CI ond the f Renton Lnw16.7 13.7 Y Y° p CB#3 TYPE 1 CB Department of Public Works. p¢ N z LA %The surface water drainage system.all be constructed according to the ¢d CB#4 TYPE 1-P CB 16.9 14.3 approved plan which are on file in the Department of Public Works. My w deviation from the approved plans will require written approval Irani the City of gZ W INLET(f3A 12'CMP N/A 15.2 INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, Renton Department of Public Works or Bartow Water Utility ON Sa SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 4 A whenever co INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, is in °f these approved plops moat be on the job site w construction ¢ INLET OA 12'CMP N/A 16.6 progress. SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, Datum shall be NAVD 88.unless otherwise approved by City a Renton OUTFACE g48 12"CONC. N/A 16.2 SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 Department plas of Public Works. Reference bendimark and elevation are noted n il oq INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, 6.AII sedimentation/erosion facilities must be in t to clearing 0 0 1 E OUTFACE#4C I2'CONC. N A 16.2operation price mq z s / SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 and building construction,and they must be satisfactorily momtained until O 3g construction is completed nd the potential far on-site rosin has passed }i z = 7.N1 retention/detentionfacilities must be installed nd In operation prier to --f W ua _ or n...lion with all construction activity unless otherwise approved by k+ U�r oc \ +� s J••,•• +ion I I — I \ -- the Deportment of Public Works,Surface Water Utility. a o \ \ WATER NH �1° / I _• 1 \ — B.Grns seee may be applied by...seeding. me grass seen mixture.Doer \ SEATTLE METRO 558M TCP 17 OT / I ✓- than City of Renton approved standard mixes.shall be submitted by a eZE // / _ CB 48(EX) Landscape Architect and approved by the Department of Public Works.Surface B _ _ \ N�V=112�IIN C.I'_'CCNC.1 VALVE F 11-'] �,` i J J — I ADJUST RIM AND CRATE Water Utility. C 71 `c \ 6, =.0'_(OUT 5.1_"CONC.7 1 TO REV- •.0 cr \ O SEATTLE METRO SSMM ----__ - - - = - 9.AII paccoripe ee and appurtenances shall be lad on a properly prepared foundation in m purten ces.11 al the onpent Stale of pared ton ation in T \ GRAPHS SCALE W/LOCni 5 LID _1IIMIXTER SEPARATOR/2,/� 1- � Specification fee Road and Bridge Construction. This shall include necessary �\(\ \ g too RI=140, WITH EXTERKKC SHUTOFF// / _ O �' leveling of the trench bottom a Ue top of the foundation material as well as g,s y® INV=n'0 ACCESS - VALVE CONNECT To / placement and compaction of required bedding material to uniform d toot Ili \ ADJUST RIM TO ANITA'Y 6 / F / .egrade so / r- 1 f lM1e entire pip,lengthb at the pipe cell be supported n a unity.exception y dense unyielding ij \ \ \ EL=1900 - err® �+ 1` - I ( / base. All pipe bedding shalt be APWA Class'C'.with the exception of PVC �\ Ail. — pipe. All trepan b90X shall be per ASIted to 57-7 um 95%for pavement and \ / r"on eon •p 1 / - .��— . = 9� structural fill one sox otherwise Per ASIN D-1557-70 Pea gravel bedding shall \ 9� \ va�1 - -,,:� -��— /_ _ 1 ,.(, be 6'over and under P.NC pipe. T \ EPy + I�j1 _ N __� T,.Galvan cad steel pipe and luminized steel pipe tar all drainage lac.-- ` sM1NI M1ave asphalt treatment BI a better NSide and oulsitle. i aE \ \ ADJUST E%SD VAULT w.�_ 1' B,N 5T RIM AND CR \, A<' 11,Slruclures shall not be permitted w7117 10 feet e/the spring line of any I�g� fP \ ACCESS HATCHES P My+ •ELEV.18.1 ���� ` storm drainage pipe,or 15 feet from the top of any chnnel bank. I f \ TO EIEV.1].0 ++part-P' r �1 • kPO \s.:"---_,.....www.i. '��'W sew - 12 N1 catch boom t shall be depressed CLIO feet below - = = iT s1'1 /_- PROPOSED' ,�i _ �' -�+ - grates s a pavement level. -C ENIERPWp CAR a `\�RENTAL ra CYw w ` ea \\ 13.open cut road crossings.rough existng public right of way won not be 11`a PROPOSED 1 (=250 SO s �� a -�A 17. ', all0.etl unleaa specifically pproved by Ble City of Renton Admnistrotor,TU4.O SOS�CE ;\ Q �•'� Department of Planning/Bonding/Public Works. - - �. \ 1 �(),lI ' �� Ar'. RIM AND a•"�— — ..Reek for erosion protection of roadside ditches,where required,shall be of \ wir w"1 1 / %'�+ '—�� 0 E �+•. � \�' sound quarry rock placed to a depth oft Iwt and must meet the following __ !J lJ CB p6(•x) ptfill - 'C -B" Ox-70x oc/ passing,and-2" gq 9p 9p \ � �� nN � Nitti icatwna:4 /4 passing,2"-4'r k 30x-40x i 1 J S { - a 0 // Z � —!� CBlS _�-- TL �' - e\ k1500660x passing. �,CTk WN • 15.NI building downspouts and footing drains shall be connected to the tam 1\ \~r \ ligl ,:�k+�� ' drainage system,unless aproved by the Department of Development Services. ad \ ' M:#5(EX „be, 'al 50 / Plan Reviewer Surface Water Utility. An accurately dimension.Certified as- 1 \ '11j g'I�I .. Ar f AND CRATE 1 2 . - \ built drawing of this drainage system cell be submitted to the City of Renton N�\ w.�* 0ELEY.IB.1 / upon completion. ��i -ilk : ►� i �O t - - ~,�'� 1g0�.0.,,•s`• '1`6./6 - --�'- 16tssuanc the the Building te r ConstructiionaPermitabunthe City liability Renton does s koh — , ��i5l _ x i —�1' not�k� �� ''/.. / INLET/A cnnecled with storm surtoca water disposition. iuNha,the City of Renton ��� +� does not accept any obligation for the proper functioning and maintenance of the ,k`` �� •'� , system Protract during c rW be responsible 41 2 \ Pa n`. T 1 ,� �/' devices,17.11.Cprotecl a equontractor lipment.daggers.a d any iother nng eeded uate safeguard. to safety ii �� J'BREAK IN CURB FOR SURFACE the Zile health,and safetyof the public.and to protect property in connection with the performance of workcovered bLthe contract�lny_wak +5: DdRAINAGE FLOP.BCONSTRUCTF SURFACE A witRvrthelraaNetlTighro wa�tliai may inlenupl normal tralRc flow sM1all •Y�,.Iii�., Y Gifu ` pE.]1' ILLWAY require°n aPProced traffic control plan Cy the Traffic Engineering Divlsin al —— —— \\e.,`\ Sk�LY�'i a — p /' TO BDTLOM Oi WAIEfl OUAIJTY$WALE the Deoa�tment al Public Works. All°ectians al the W.S.D.O.T.Standard 1 p`A �� - + / USE 2'TO 4'QUARRY SPALLS Spttificabns t-OT-23,Traffic Control,shall aPPIY iii / tfl,' OIL/WATER SEPARATOR/1 1 \ .,� �a g�OPNO1 VALVE 1,1111 CONN SANITARY ECT �y\,T.Reria \ ¢ American Engmeen • Planners • Surveyors t t\,' Engineering Ir '�`M1 ',/ II! :11• Corporation "'son" ./IYl• 7' /{ /' _ (20¢)eel-Tripp fox(goa)am-nits — y - \ --31-98 A-NNNNAA @ ' • • �ZJ 3} 6) II 6 vza FLOOR PLAN NOTES e At Eh 30-0' 32'4 30'-0' �'� /Sf31d8 I. Toilets equipped for handicapped use. K��& 3. Sainl eoium 3. ln elec l panel 4. Telephone panel -0'S'-4'5-4'S'-4'•'-4'S4'4'-0' Ib'-0' 10'-0' S'-4'"-4'S'4'•'i' ' •4'S-4'4'-0' S. Line of overhangf eea above. 6. Downspout from scupper above. Connect to storm rater system I �lI � © � T. Concrete conewalk ditioning 8. Planting area.Refer to Landscape Dews. 8. Sidewalk retry 18. Garage entry curb cut out ����pp {{�pt®® 0 12. eater heater © 11. Air condltlonlnp condensing units (n •1 hIMIN�����1® MTIB .,.,.:.4� l ® il �+...:, 14. OYcapr parking ,� �j Q .O Q 4 1 15. Electric meterLLJ Rq FUFAIM lrri \� � I � �� 4) 7 Q 30. 2x4 furring l 24'o.c.Insulated with 3 1/2'fiberglass 6 g I ,. COWERENCE IL?'li&I'�,L I I --- batt lnsulat ion covered with vapor Darr ler.furred waIl ®® anchored to OM with expansion anchors leaving 1/2'air space Y - ,; I ROOM I(x ^,fl .- Y _-- — between 2e4 and OU wall.fInlsh end GIB to be provided by the t. >.Q I ft j.-»�v II q 31. �ooatenanw lndow sill. /� • I WALLS Q V',, Ir I I .a. I / I(,",!�i;_YI 40. 8'au tlnlsn type per eater for elevations. pg I OPEN V © Q •:,,. +. y. .. .� -aa-A E •Itj Qa' :1;._f{`,.a� clvr rAce • i I 1, _I Vil 1 � ,�a. E 'y _1 I µ'el ii i {;'=:1 7P Y „ uflaal wAY W :-. w" /5 t is173 Q.,.:.„,.m,.;-'.„.... 1 ►TI'.;; �/®fly_-_...�., __. .,�.. _ .... I`,^ :... .� �� iti -'I .! Ik-I '»_;a-:IIW MI Y .:,..:.;..:, I-- s. 4 .�• . � 4-- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ooe 3 0f, rL kb PALL — 0 nFACE CM @g Et 1.1451,6 C. p i ., Alio, y 4 C .;: .�" WOW AaNtlus I = 2 ENCLOSURE SECTION PM mcaroam Ng WALL J i 44r I WIN.egrn : __tuamurs - u cweeaTFLOOR PLANt�NVEr.r- 4P iRNr 5 n4. ',34, ■■11111111 Ra)St cram proved By . (�t•Apyr•Vur gy 4 0 2 4 13 12 4f.-••aa fit' c � C JPA • By I"4B4I t,HWe Z ua•r-0 ()DUMPSTER GATE rttoeo N2 A2.2 is WALL S 7-0Tie — Ac I I N G. I." T 0 1__N_i 9.. , . W A S i- ,i . I, I ...,,,. ck 1 .I 7 .1 II_ .4 Cr) '‘I " -•-••-1-•L‘l--- . I • • ".c.c.;,L./..7 7-..:.;I.."7:-.27!. .. (I) „. i!;1 1 .i-'Ft-- 7. Ili Ci •-. w. P' • -•''''••••=oelri. r ..-7 - 1 1 .2 Z \ - 1,1 • ,r‘ :I 7:1 , • I \ . .I. • ....................... il' ' 813 -•.. ---- -- ' (ri 4 , 8. \ 0 2, -- 1___.._.. .R, . a . 40 :I! : a 1 I 2 • 3 it I I o 900 , •1; I p_i, 1:. T E C. .H N . I 1 ii0:=--- -A-- i 1, .,. .°'• I : k 903 ,.2 i•,' (.9 , Ill 7••• III, •._•••• • -11-7_2TV 14, '' 0 ., ,i, ,. (2) • ,I.,• :L.O.GA1 ai.ITC18 r. .,, ct. 7 , II;1.__..-- ------:, i• ‘t 1-.i .r... \\,\ , i• il „ o ‘ Y -3.4Y4'2-: .3 tr, . • -[ --/ ....... .,. 1.4 -D I I ei 09 10 1 • ;%, • LU - 'R . . 1 / ‘ r.11 COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I i 1 1.1• • 0 I .A ,t. C E T 'I. 1E R . • 1-... z .. - % (3) '4. `"•1 1 Lin .. -.. r,, .:.. 0 s. Ct . -7 - ----- .1;1 I • 1 4 • „.• i 't V) f- .1 . 'Y, * , , 411}„ ,,,_ • • i „.,P 1 037 • •l7. k ‘• fl 0 4 94 SEWAGE 11 '7 e • . _.....-0A-- . ,•0 . . . ii•!- EAGLE HARDWARE . .. ... TREATMENT • 'V.; X ••• •EXTENDED STAY OF '. 1 I CORPORATE OFFICES 1.__ sr.?' ` I 75-:,., w. or • .LANT •I \ . 8 C;T:' I • V4\ • • .4 1 . I -_.-• 7. se 1.58.8\ I I I 1, ,• \ 1, 1 ‘.. „,4........ 1_!_f: - a 99 1 ' ‘V• \ l'a ---•'-.7:•:---:-. - -• ---- 1 VACANT 113 I . ....--- I 1 ‘1,,\ • t, ....._7.--_-_-__;,-..--:-„le, ' ,•,,,,- . . )'\ I_.- -...-•;,;-,-ipor. „,,,,:._ •v _,.....••• ' ' -:.,-4.1-311 ‘ '''' in \ .-....--i---5•.;•' '.'••,,'t'.-,,,---•i:...1.f..: f 4 ... , PROJECT SITE /Ili 51P , \NM. . _... 0.,. 9 8 1 6 11 J-1-I 108.6A. •1 // 11,Di , _ •- - ! iff312 il i° [ , ___ t GR • , I- \; YillAge . „0, -al 1 .1,-----. 19 18 1. _,.-:„--- - 'ICI-1:111114:119 2°111 22 23 t ). 1; ..., , 13 12 II ,01.1 1_ -i- - io 5 I , ...,-------- jiff •,or or ..,,:s N.• ,-1,,wis 14 ,,i ss 0. io 1.• to,riss .„-.1 .5 1 0 rilOil9181:1-1-kttrr--f1-14,414915 1 1115;1,--t4 : IltP-•3"-'•• _r -----1- --- W‘14S141-Si , .).---"„t . 4-voi441451461471 1 I 1. .i.•. .._.': i _I,. :;f1 I , PARIC F _, _ CITY UNIVERSITY - isr• ; 6 5 4.13 .. :4•-•-- ••*•; ;•••••- 3° -1-1 I 34 3536 31 11.63 3,%11 ‘,132 3. u a j i • 1-1, - - -..- 24 1111Y. ,.,66 __,-.-- Ar._ -1-11-LI 1 3 2 1 1--1:1-:;--: ;"-orio ‘.72 11 • • f°1 a 1L-L'' 4 I...-.1 i;••.-... lsti.)40..,5-11 ..., . 14 21-10 1,3_18_1.1 11.15:I:12_i_zi. ' • i •.••• • .................• , , „..,. ....c. ,L•••-•11.-•:,:"1 1\11....Eies..:tAt.e.:,:-sg.2.'-'.'Fi....W.....,Y......,... 4,P. .............•••••••••... • • - s • . • IS 1i 32 11 01.1;111 1 ..'.:3 4--'' 4 • R--- „....H ,. .,.f,. ..,,, ,.,, ,---,. ..-..---'• .,..,--: '`........'t .........,\.ss . 1.L.4 1 rrir r Eff I IL?:I. 2 "atiA .11-33i-i26----i1 ;.R I as. 06-1,Ir •.;••.:•:-"' 0.,,,, ui ' ,.i..;•1'1.. •, s 4-1 C451 : ' •" •i I.365c , .4 . I i ‘-.. a..i...".r. . ..;11!. • 41 P 1 .15 1 .1• ( 9-* 8(147-41 . Llu 1 1 pi 4,5• 13v 2, , 1 I-----1 r/1 A. 6 30 Pii-•V-0.--I Pli JI 1 •t, ),, , .„inn jr_gr._____11 0_ ,,,,,,440:•I .. _N.r..F_., _.____,•-it_i . , , • I i . 1 1 - q 147 416 17 18 1211 22 23124 2511 •118 1-9 P 2123 24 2S 26 21 28 291 120 21 22 2324 25 . 8 29 30 31 I 1 "- ; 1 0\,, ,..... -.• ...Iv)l. • <,!'„....- .., ..1,1 6.-...„- .. • . .. • - le?. rt s6 350 ..10.• 00 • • • . . . 101 I•70 • ...11 • . • • •MI AIL- • • . , ••• S.W. . I6TH ST 1 . . , - . 111111111111 111!1111 i 4d,./01.I•I,I, j•l•1.Ise to c 1 I 1 113i I i 1‘1,E 01---,r-.1.rii...i...j.:,‘,- ! : ;•1 : Milli, ,Illill ,I -4 ul ilili..4, II : . C1.1,111;11111 ,•••1,1 al.- 4 -la 11.1.7 I i •11••1-1-1-1- I 1 1(41 IT--'j4-4-•r r- r- • - •111; pci.lci•cli,d5i.41.1,,, tti :aim-0:11015131:i 1111011 '111:1111 -• 7.. -...--1-1,...1..2ti- 4,-)-171fl-tiiiriz . . • • 11 . :\sL....._______.....`_4:_co.r•upe,.:::r,G-T__, :T.___I:jr1 .se .431_.2Q__:i .‘_' ....e...1,,,t;i.l.„6„:___:_ti.j."4.?_ )___i_i.igoui..:.... \\.•‘.- ____fft., 1 _ -77116... 13 N xi7-!_ fr.gi(c)) !f, 42 --. ./ „3.,.; ,-- it i• 61 . ___13 2. .:1 w ji_ • NORTH ' 7- -ris.---. LL...7---------i••/ : -?//j:-..41--•••;29-r ki:- -- • • i . L.,...4., 71::4•4ii --•' Pip--- • . s I! .1._.58 _Ns • SCALE:1" _ -200' ••• .:14:- `zt• 3"...• ' • 4 CV IP`55 .2.41... .. ' • . VICINITY IVIAP - • . .\\- PIERRE-GRADY WAY SITE -- 1 . I . . • I • \ ' .. • .q- .3D .._ 41 X.i.• C..(J.._49 to- og \ . . zl :diliillifi x' iggggggi opgypppgqqqg6ptgq&' xiglgeEilx i IP rillit Z W ' ` a Ct \ W J. a~O ot Of, TPA.Sn ENCLOSURE ;*0 0 • ` p 6ALLON Q o'1' 1v ''<<<�d` fY'1 ` , ro IE�IIPRB�@ UNLEADED S.DIA W V CC To ,.......sic 6l�Srl X---x.,1_, \, 1 LN 20p00 eutoN j• _- (\ >b�z O 10'DIANUFADED�, :Aj+ KIRTLEY ,i''EX FH ®KIRTLE s. M1A M �,,, cie „ ,/+ 0, ��' °o-, .` ~ O -►~' yule , - Gt A �`• ;/ y '�' G \ � PLAN AND DETAILS \..��+^'' �\j) GATE II/11/(I_ PRQECT NE 203-11_ DEEMER PAO r SHEET /\ SITE PLAN - — I!WA%20 ET Pxa. Set Ib1S 1 Lug '98, nip, S►A"H, • C k _. __ METRO 6 Exchange Building 1107 3W()Lady Way #100 Id ' 821 Second Avenue R.,..l....,WA 90055 Seattle,WA 98104 I k CITY OF RENTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT#1 j 200 Mill Avenue S 1 601 West Gowe Street 1 1 Renton,WA 98055 Kent,WA 98032 PUGET WESTERN,INC. i INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS &INDUSTRIAL 19515 Nortli Creek Parkway#310 335 116th Avenue SE Bothell,WA 98011 Bellevue,WA 98004 - I - I ' ' PUGET SOUND POWER&LIGHT BLACKRIVER Jv Llc P.O. Box 901868 I 4690 95th Avenue NE Bellevue,WA 98009 Bellevue,WA 98004 - 1 Earlington Business Park Burlington Northern Santa Fe P. 0. Box 565048 11700 E Golf Road #400 Dallas, TX 75356 Schaumburg, IL 60173 1 - - - I ` 1 Systems Control, Inc. 1 The Bridge Group , 8656 154t1% Avenue NE 16443 SE 35th Street Redmond, WA 98052 1 Bellevue, WA 98008 I 1 King Count 1 Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance 506 2nd Avenue #708m 1 720 E Wisconsin Avenue 1 Seattle, WA 98104 Milwaukee, WI 53202 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Li iiiihi6 1 . I 1 _.,�._ l- c0 ` .v,) CITY C ,! RENTON el. r4 , Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse•Tanner,May.r Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 9, 2002 • I Mr. Gr-g Robertson Eagle one Development dba. Grady Way Shell & Deli 1120 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subje•t: Modification of Approved Site Plan for Sorrento's Espresso File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R, ECF 1 Dear r. Robertson: I This le er is to inform!,you that we have approved your proposed revisions to the Grady Way S ell and•Deli site plan. ,f-; '` - "..: . The si e plan was initially appr;Oved by Ina..Hearing:Examiner on November 19, 1998. The a•proved site plan included ,a total of 2.74 acres whioftallowed development of a car re tal and sales agency and:;a gas station. This'proposajmodifies only the Grady Way hell and Deli site: The=.proposed Yespresso.:stand•,would be located on the same. parcel s the existing Grady Way Snell and0.Deji„Specifically, theiproposal would involve the foil wing alterations::to:.the approvedste;plan ,"°, ' Y; � • Construct j a-: 230 square,, foot dne-up, walk-up espresso stand, including an ADA ramp and,wood deck-Y : - • Design a designated.queuing lane for.drive=up'customers; • Install one!new parkingG stall for espresso:jemploy..ee parking, and • Remove one existing fuel_pump`island. ,- The Ste Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan a changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the devel pment, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and faciliti s, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H . I • The roposed modifcations would result in a net change to the amount of on-site parkin for this specific site by an increase of one parking space from 11 to 12 total space . Vehicle access and circulation for the remaining three fuel islands would not be impac ed as the queuing lane is designed to designate separate circulation patterns. There are no proposed modifications to landscaping or signage. Therefore, the propo ed changes are approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan. -. The a plicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and itigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the 1055 South!Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N rT O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Sorrento' Espresso • Minor Modification Page 2 of 2 development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval may be required for future modific tions to the site plan. This de ision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourtee (14) day appeal. period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the admini rative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m., A ril 23, 2002 and accompanied by a $75.00 appeal fee. If you have questions regardi g this correspondence, feel free to contact Susan Fiala at(425)430-7382. Sincerely, flult6 Jennife Henning,'Zoning AdmirSis.. tor sA. Develo•ment Services Division:: ` s ~tr" 1'' ~'' "Ise•'' 4°' y, he: Parties of Record xt ,,;?'F. • '4;:� y" _ - ,,� ,,. x . > Kayren Kittrick x " :A,c:..:.""' Ali:x Susan Fiala Land Use File N ° Y:x ' = r,4 ''Y.j� "% • 'Yh..• .3i"`c.F( y '$tr 'yA f• • • 4y I 4.• d a i • • • • . WC `JG py'p^ nv- i� • • • • • ', f.:�� I. • Ab) 1 --t,,.4)6„ .. • , \ - . . a , '^ \- . 4 r ..:.e 'r'.'''`j • , . • \ Iv %, . �,\i _ c • �/�', i .. . *c . is % \ Coe---. ----'-r: § . • .14 I • . • . • . . . . . • . •t F$ . • • ' • • �\ ' ' o 1?_, � _N . . %. • COPYRIGHT NOTICE R E V I S I O N S I♦ mo�.�.® A �7 DATE � Ana By EAGLE ONE DEVELOPMENTo � 6 ` • g og iiiim GRADY WAY. S}IaL AND DELI ,m� aa, ,a ,�s ,, u - -1Z ?zI' AEC of GRADY MAY O4XODM.E PrO°PM.COS45 GI m, ,,,,.� oo� �I'I�I I I I II DEMON NABfi�TON .111.0 emonMOR-Oar. `z II Retu Address: City C erk's Office City o Renton 1055 S. Grady Wayl Rento WA 98055 Please •rint or type information Docu• ent Title(s): Restrictive Coveniants Refer:nce Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: [on pa:.e of document(s)] N/A Grants r(s) (Last name first,then first name and initials): 1• Ja es P. and Barbara Lynn Pierre 2. 3. imkr 4. 0 •dditional names on page of document Grant•e(s) (Last name first,then first name and initials): !� .. 1• �., 2. 3. 4. 0 Additional names on page of document r d 11 Legal Description (abb'reviated: i.e.lot,block,plat or section,township,range): That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Rang: 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington } II L L in A ditional legal is on page A—lof document Asse•sor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: 91:800-0125; 242304-9110 0 A.ditional legal is On page of document g The •uditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the doc ent to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. g • RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REAS,JAMES F.and BARBARA.LYNN PIERRE,are the owners of the real prope y described in Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein; and REAS,said property is currently zoned CO in the City of Renton; and I EREAS, the CO zoning does not allow for certain desirable uses including, but of limited to. gas stations,niin-marts; automobile sales,rental,and leasing; and 1'REAS,the City of Renton has conditionally approved a rezone of the subject property from CO o IM on certain conditions,one of which is the execution and recording of this restrictive covenan • and 1 REAS, the City wants to preclude undesirable manufacturing, storage and heavy industri type uses front the subject property though allowed in the WI zone; •W,THEREFORE,the undersigned as owners of the subject property do hereby pla e a restrictiv• covenant on the subject property, subject to the terms and conditions as hereinaft set forth,to , 't: d' 1 Restrictive Covenant. The owners of the subject property agree not to utilize the c?' property•escribed in Schedule A for the uses other than applied for,which include a gas station ith mini-m. ;automobile sales,rental and leasing;offices associated with these primary permitted uses; or other •imilar uses,without first applying for,processing and obtaining approval from the City of Renton •r an amendment to this restrictive covenant allowing any other such use not allowed by the fore=oing_ Change in Zoning. If the zoning of the subject property is changed by the City of Renton '1i the future, the property owner will, in addition to the uses authorized herein, also be allowed o utilize the subject property for any uses authorized by the zoning classification to w ich the subj: t property is rezoned. This restrictive covenant will be binding on the heirs and successors of the o ers. ATED this ;c2.5---day of /' 0.t r !_ , 1999. J es P.Pierre Barbara Lynn Pi 1 . • I i i 1 , 7 I/ STATE F WASHINGTON) . : ss. County o King ) • this day pers nally appeared before me JAMES P. PIERRE and BARBARA LYNN PIERRE,to me known toll be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoling instrume at, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act.and deed, for the u es and purposes therein mentioned. 1 I EN ug �Vld"is and official seal this a.� day of /n � , 1999.. ��%%%.a.%1,%,,Cy �I, , ), /iatf/L 1 . , i �•�' . / 's� �v Print Name: m �.� l.( 12�D j, 1 L'��. %,� 8 n +� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the tate of GO 447- Washington,residing at U l �il i, of INN My Commission Expires: _ -'/7--0 I �I picrre\restrica a coevnantlme ' rl I C it ri it C CI • • • • II • • 1 i • • • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A The lan• referred to in this policy is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: Tha portion of Lot 12 and Tract B of Washington Technical Center, • acc rding to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 122 of Plats, pag s 98 through 102, inclusive, in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23, North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: • Commencing at the northeast corner of the south 40 feet of Section 13; the ce north 88115'00" west along the north line of the south 40 • fee , a distance of 854.73 feet, more or less, to the west line of V, Pow 11 Avenue Southwest, being the northwest corner of Earlington KI+ Ind strial Park Number 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Q Vol me 88 of Plats, page 80, in King County, Washington; the ce south 1°14 '28" west along the west line of said Earlington Ind strial ParklNumber 2 and its prolongation thereof 1, 810 feet, mor or less, tq the southerly line of the 100 foot Northern Pacific Rail ay right-of-way (now Burlington Northern, Inc. ) ; 72, the ce southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 151.42 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; the ce continuing southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 310 feet; thenlce north 12°I32 '30" west a distance of 120 feet; thence northeasterly parallel to the southerly line of said right-of-way a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to a point which bears north 12°32'30" west of the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 12°132 '30" east a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (BEING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line•.Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARC! L B: • A strip of land immediately south of and adjoining the right-of-way of t e Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, said strip being more fully described as follows, to-wit: Begi ping at the point of intersection of the south marginal line of the eight-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Rail ay with the, west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quar er of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Wasihington, which bears south 0°15'30" east 556.1 feet from the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quar er of said 'Section 24; (legal description, continued) • A-1 • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A 1 LEGAL DE'•CRIPTION, continued: thence south 0°l5'30" east 138.78 feet to a point-; thene north 76°13 ' east 135 feet from and parallel to the south marginal line of the right-of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, 1,385.27 feet to a point on the east line of s id Section 24; then a north 0025' west 138.78 feet to the intersection of the east line of said Section 24 with the south marginal line of the righ -of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, whic said point of intersection lies 198 feet south 0°25' east from the ortheast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast guar er of said Section 24; then a following said south marginal line of the right-of-way of the Rent branch of the Northern Pacific Railway south 76°13 ' west .1,384 .8 feet to the place of beginning; EXCE•T that portioni thereof lying easterly of the westerly line of Powe 1 Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by Quit Clai Deed recorded under Recording Number 8309300560; CO (BEI G a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment � + No. 104-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . T PARC L C: [T That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of _A That Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, CT Wash'ngton, described as follows: C Begiining at the southwest corner of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°55'12" east along the west side, . 348.27 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of 'land herein described; thence north 77°29'12" east 438.59 feet to an intersection with the northerly margin of the Puget Sound Electric Railroad right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said northerly margin an arc distance .of 274.18 feet to a point of tangency, the radial line of which bears south 12°30'48" east for a distance of 741.82 feet to the radial , center; thence north 77°29'12" east along said northerly margin 672.76 feet to the easterly line of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°45'23" east along said east line 25.69 feet to the southerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence south 77°29'12" west along said southerly margin 1,118.28 feet to a point of curve, having a 'radius of 905.35 feet, the radial center of which bears south 12°30'48" east; the ce southwesterly along said curve and south margin an arc. dis ance of 26161 feet to an intersection with the west line of sai• southwest .quarter; the ce south 0°55'12" west 38.52 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oak=sdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438 . (legal description, continued) . A-2 • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL D: A strip of land 50 feet wide, being 25 feet in width on each side of a centerline of definite location of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) Renton branch, on, over, •acjross and through that certain 10 acre tract of land along the n rtherly side of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and p rt of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24•' i Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, W shington, and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of • ' said Section 24, the centerline being more particularly described as follows: • B ginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of the d finite location of the Renton branch of the Seattle-Tacoma I terurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) with the south C9 line of the 10 acre tract described above which bears south 29°41' C24 west 264.7 feet from the center of Section 24, Township 23 North, CD Range 4 EastO .M. , in King County, Washington; p+�. t ence in a northeasterly direction as follows: Tr T4 C rving to the left by a radius of 716.8 feet a distance of 274.3 'Ct1 let to a point; thence north 33°17' east 345 feet to point; thence curving to the right by a radius of 716.8 feet, a distance of Crl 536.6 feet to a point; t ence north 76°13 ' east 685.2 feet to a point on the east line of t e southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, T wnship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, w ich bears south 0°15' east 607.5 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24,. T wnship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; • E CEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of O kesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by dee• ✓ corded under Recording Number 8711020438. PARCEL E: • B ginning at a point on the east boundary linetof the southwest q arter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, R nge 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0Ib15'30" east 633 .21'feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; t ence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line o the Puget Sound Electric Railway's right-of-way a distance of 117.89 feet; t ence on a course south 13°47' east a distance of 19 feet; t ence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 .32 feet; t ence on a course north 0°13 '30" west a distance of 19.54 feet to t e point of beginning. (legal description, continued) A-3 r 1 i Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: P. -CEL F: Th4t portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 24, • Tos'nship 23 North, Range 4. East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, de cribed as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of South 153rd Sheet with the east line of said northwest quarter of the southeast qu rter; thence westerly along said street, 350 feet; thence northerly at right angles to said street line, 800 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway C right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way 360 feet, more or less, "0. toits intersection with the east line of said southwest quarter of TI the northeast .quarter; thence south 860 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TP EX EPT that portion thereof lying southerly of the northerly line of T4 S. . Grady Way (Black River Junction-Renton Road;) AN EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton, by 7 de d recorded under Recording Number 8804110193; EXCEPT that. portion thereof described as follows: Be inning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest qu rter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Ra ge 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0° 5'30" east 633.21 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest • qurter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway's right-of-way a distance of 11 .89 feet; th nce on a course south 13°47' east a distance of 19 feet; th nce on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 .38 feet; thence on a course north 0°15'30" west a distance of 19.54 feet to thel point of beginning; • TO6ETHER• WITH a 20 foot wide easement for ingress and egress being 10 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot .11 a distance of 95i1l feet north from the southeast corner thereof; said beginning. point being on a curve concave to the southeast from whence the ra ius point bears south 0°08 '59" west. a distance of 52.5 feet; th nce southwelsterly along the arc of said curve 81.47 feet to a po nt of tangency; • (legal description, continued) • A-4 • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: thence south1°14'28" west 16.67 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 52.5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 69.84 feet to the point of tangency; the4ce south 77°27'30" west 40.32 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 52.5 feet; • thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 41.23 feet to the poi t of tangency; thence south 32r27'30" west 31.28 feet to a point on the northerly line and 3 .72 feet from the most northerly corner of Lot 3 of Lot Lin: Adjustment1004-83 as recorded under King County Auditor's File Nu 'er 8309309001 and the terminus of this description, as disclosed by ing County Recording Number 8602280930. • R • CT "if END OF SCHEDULE A • • A-5 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLI-CA_T_I.O1V Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the ___ SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL CITY OF RENTON 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE RENTONIC TY COU�NCIPTED BY Following are summaries of ordinances a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal ! adopted by the Renton City Council on April 26,1999: newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ORDINANCE NO.4778 • prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language An ordinance of the City of Renton, continuallyas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCounty, Washington. The South CountyI Chapter 2, Aira Guns, Section 6(Pol2-3 of 9 Chapter 2, Guns, of Title VI (Police, Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Regulations) of City Code by adding an exception relating to the control of migra- State of Washington for King County. tory birds. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Effective: May 30,1999 - Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers ORDINANCE NO.4779 Aduring the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Wass ordinance of the czy Renton, ordinance changing the zoning classifi- cation of approximately 2.74 acres located ! at SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ordinances#4778&4779 and Powell Avenues SW from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM), as published on: 4/30/99 Pierre rezone,R-98-126. Effective: May 5,1999 — Complete texts of these ordinances are The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$46.00, I available at the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way,and posted at the charged to Acct. No. 8050640. Renton Public Library, 100 Mill Avenue South, Upon request to the City Clerk's Legal Number 6033 office (425) 430-6510 copies will also be AD , Leh mailed for a fee. � / MarilynJ.Petrsengal Clerk, Sout County Journal City Clerk/Cable Manager, Published''nilaeSouth County Journal ' �' 1 April 30,1999.60335'. 1..',-- .f Su • sworn before me on s day of Mali/G 19 9 . 0111111/40 • O .••iol G, ' Notary Public of the State of Washington �f- :moo '��`0'� residing in Renton ? r soTARy �'•. ? . King County, Washington • - -•— '3 pUBL1 ' o '' A%.* o.:Z: i'il/FO p il'V A 5 H`Nc,.f .. CITE OF RENTON ' City Clerk Jesse Tanner Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 29, 1999 • James and Barbara Pierre 9419 rystal Lake Road Wood nville, WA 98072 Subje t: James Pierre Rezone (SW Grady Way @ Oakesdale Ave. SW); File No: R-98-126 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pierre: Enclosed is a copy of Ordinance No. 4779, adopted by the Renton City Council on Apriil 26, 1999, kvhich finalizes the rezone of the subject matter. If additional assistance or information is req ired,please d not hesitate to call. Since ely, Mich:le Neumann Recor Is Management Coordinator • Enc. • • • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer d' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4 7 7 9 AN RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) TO "[VI (ME IUM INDUSTRIAL) (PIERRE REZONE; FILE NO.MIOrAtI98t1A6;R)., WH REAS,, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV' (Developme t Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Ren on," as amended, and maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as CO (Commercial Office); and WH REAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has bee filed with the De elopment Planning Department on or about August 14, 1998, which petition was duly referred to he Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been eld thereon on or about November 3, 1998, and said matter having been duly considered by the Heari g Examiner, a d the Hearing Examiner having recommended that said zoning request be denied, and he applicant having filed an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision to the City Council on Decemb:r 30, 1998, and the City Council, at its meeting on March 15, 1999, having approv'd the recommend.tion of the Planning and Development Committee to grant the zoning request subject to restrictive civenants, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensiv Plan, 1 as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NO , THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL .OF THE CITY OF' RENTON, WASHING ON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 e b ORDINANCE NO.. 4 7 7 9 l SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to IM (Medium Industrial) as hereinbelow specified, subject to the decision of the City Council dated March 15, 1999; the Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of • the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attach d hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, approximately 2.74 acres, is located at S.W. Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and Powell Avenue S.W.) SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of April , 1999. Marilyn J. et en, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of April , 1999. P-44-4. a•ii..."4"- Jess r anner, Mayor A ed as to form: ..„,......A„,_pa.74..„....,,_ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 30, 1999 (Summary only) ORD.775:3/17/99:as. . 2 f� 1 I t_ I • 1 I 1 Policy No. 1093-0095911 SCHEDULE A i The 1-nd referred to in this policy is situated in the County of King, 1 State of Washington, and described as follows: 1 P, •CEL A: 1 T at portion 9f Lot 12 and Tract B of Washington Technical Center, 1 • a cording to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 122 of Plats,' I p ges 98 through 102, inclusive, in King County, Washington, more p rticularly described as follows: 1 T at portion If the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23: N rth, Range 4 East, ,W.M. , in King County, Washington, described -as1 f llows: C mmencing at the northeast corner of the south 40 feet of I• S ction 13; I t ence north 88°15'00" west along the north line of the south 40 I . fret, a distance of 854 .73 feet, more or less, to the west line of 1 Powell Avenue Southwest, being the northwest corner of Earlington I dustrial Park Number 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in1 Volume 88 of Plats, page 80, in King County, Washington; I tience south 1°14 '28" west along the west line of said Earlington 1 Ildustrial Park Number 2 and its prolongation thereof 1,810 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of the 100 foot Northern Pacific Railway rightiof-way (now Burlington Northern, Inc. ) ; t. ence southwesterly along said right-pf-way a distance of 151.42 I fret to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; t ence continuing southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance o 310 'feet; i ' t. ence north 12°32'30" west a distance of 120 feet; I • t. ence northeasterly parallel to the southerly line of said 1 1 ✓ ght-of-way a distance of 310 feet, more or les , to a pointiwhichl bears north 12°32'30" west of the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; t ence south 12°32'30" east a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to t e TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (::EING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment I No . 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . 1 1 P CEL B: • 1 A strip of land immediately south of and adjoining the right-of-way1, o the Rentonlbranch of the Northern Pacific Railway, said strip being more fully described. as follows, to-wit: B-ginning at- he point of intersection of the south marginal line of t e right-of-'way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway with the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast. q arter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in • KVng County, Washington, which bears south 0°15'30"east 556 .1 feet f om the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast q arter of said Section 24; I (legal description, continued) 1 . • A-1 • I • I • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: thence south 0°15'30" east 138 .78 feet to a point; thence north 76°13 ' east 135 feet from and parallel to the south marginal line of the right-of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, 1,385.27 feet to a point on the east line of said Section124; thence north 0°25' west 138 .78 feet to the intersection of the east line of said Section 24 with the south marginal line of the right-of-way ofl said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, , which said point of intersection lies 198 feet south 0°25' east from the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thence following said south marginal line of the right-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway south 76°13 ' west .1,384 .8 feet to the place of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying easterly of the westerly line of Powell Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by Quit Claim Deed recorded under Recording Number 8309300560; (BEING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARCEL C: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said southwest quarter; thence north .0°55'12" east along the west side, . 348 .27 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of •land herein described; thence north 77°29 '12" east 438.59 feet to an intersection with the northerly margin of the Puget Sound Electric Railroad right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said northerly margin an arc distance of 274.18 feet toga point of tangency, the radial line of which bears south 12°30'48" east for a distance of 741.82 feet to the radial center; thence north 77°29 '12" east along said northerly margin 672 .76 feet to the easterly line of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°45'23" east along said east line 25.69 feet to the • southerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence south 77°29 '12" west along said southerly margin 1,118.28 feet to a point of curve, having a radius of 905.35 feet, the radial center of which bears south 12°30'48" east; thence southwesterly along said curve and south margin an arc. distance of 261.61 feet to an intersection with the west line of said southwest .quarter; thence south 011°55'12" west 38.52 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438. (legal description, continued) . A-2 • • • Policy No. 1093-009591• . • SCHEDULE A LEG•L DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL D: A strip of land 50 feet wide, being 25 feet in width on each side of a centerline of definite location of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) Renton branch, on, over, •across and through that certain 10 acre tract of land along the • northerly side of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and part of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24. in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of • • said Section 24, the centerline being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of the definite location of the Renton branch of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) with the south • line of the 10 acre tract described above which bears south 29°41 west 264.7 feet from the center of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; thence in a northeasterly direction as follows: Curving to the left by a radius of 716.8 feet a distance of 274.3 feet to a point; • thence north 33°17' east 345 feet to a point; • thence curving to the right by a radius of 716.8 feet, a distance of 536.6 feetlto a point; thence north 76°.13' east 685.2 feet to a point on the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which bears south 0°15' east 607.5 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; • EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line if, Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City. of Renton by eed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438. PARCEL E: Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest • quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0°15'30" east 633 .21'feet from the northeast corner of the southliest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway's right-of-way a distance of 117.89 feet; • thence onla course south 13°47' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 .32 feet; thence on a course north 0°13 '30" west a distance of -19.54 feet to the point of beginning. . . . . (legal description, continued) • • . A-3 • • Policy No. 1093-009591 • SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL F: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4. East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: • Beginning at the intersection of the north line of South 153rd Street with the east line of said northwest quarter of the southeast quarter; thence westerly' along said street, 350 feet; thence northerly at right angles to said street line, 800 feet,--more or less, to the southerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; i thence northeasterly along said right-of-way 360 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the east line of said southwest quarter of the northeast .quarter; • thence •south 860 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying southerly of the northerly line of S.W. Grady Way (Black River Junction-Renton Road;) AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of oakesdale- Av1enue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8804110193; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at appoint on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of the Inortheast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0°15'30" east 633 .21 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway's right-of-way a distance of 117.89 feet; i thence on a course south 13°47' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113.38 feet; thence on a course north 0°15'30" west a distance of 19.54 feet to the point of beginning; TOGETHER• WITH a 20 foot wide easement for ingress and egress being 10 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot •11 a distance of • 95.11 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; said. beginning. point being on a curve concave to the southeast from whence the radius point bears south 0°08 '59" west a distance of 52.5 feet; thence southwesterly along the -arc of said curve.. 81.47 feet to a point of tangency; • (legal description, continued) • • • A-4 410 • • Policy No. 1093-0095911 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION continued: te nce south 1°14'28" west 16.67 feet to the point of curvature of a c rve to the right having a radius of 52.5 feet; t ence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 69.84 feet to the p int of tangency; t ence south 77°27'30" west 40.32 feet to the point of curvature of • a curve to the left having a radius of 52.5 feet; t •ence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 41.23 feet to the p int of tang.ency,; t ence south 32°27'30" west 31.28 feet to a point on the northerly 1'ne and 3.721feet from the most northerly corner of Lot 3 of Lot L'ne Adjustment 004-83 as recorded under King County Auditor's, File N mber_ 8309309001 and the terminus of this description, as disclosed by King County Recording Number 8602280930. • • • • END OF SCHEDULE A • • • • A-5 a Al - .5.1 i/dr fil &V"VA 14 if•i d if—T . .,....114'.:-' ) T N • Pe-Y-- c2 \ --Im 16----.) .1 J. . C. D. 6 7th St'. I( i • • . • .(P ; CO 1 I - .. . \ • • \\.,•—.. • . • ••.. I . I o..) — • ....--•••• ------ 0 I 1 ' Mat • • • . _---- 'MM .- • . -.:: . ••• . . . . . \\Tai >,Q) ...‹ - H • 1 . =9, _I .. • . I \re) E--, . - 1C P-1 ‘ 1 0 a 1 Slli k(p....,:j--------- 1• ., I11 . • . • T 1 —t ,-- 1 1 .. _ • „Di, '1 . plaii . .--- --1 007/45,1,./11 • /11111P.--11511 0 1._ .r-is gll - I M L4 I C 0 Oil. /QP• 1405 EIN__________----7J-'- -----4*- , ,-, ,z) !6, i ' 1 - . I-3 N , . ! A, • \ - ! z .AP.' 1 I II 1 IM• \. \. -,7)----T-----7-77-7-7-1 \•• ;'i\. _\. 1 11 IM • : ' SW 16th .St. • • I , • • 2..' ! ,.1 1 1 1 i 1 L.) • . , ,\\\ .. ....i.,.. ... .n. . - ----1 . CE I 1M. :,. ::•,.... ro • C • , . i • . i \ •:.--< • . i .• 5 N. VZ r: ., .— . -•---- .... __ . __._______..__________ • ) 1 ! - i , 1 . • C 0 - I - - 1 • . . . • 11 • . ' \ . • I IL ,..------\ • i 1 . . • • , • ' . CI • A‘ 1 . 1 • • , . . 1 . • - . • . • , `.k.-„. • ) . , I . i ..:Nk • i •.. . . 1 1 • ___________ I)- . i 112 • 25 T23N R4E E 1/2 • • - 1 Ank-fir. ZONINGI • •4..cii) i' "II;ITICAL SERVICES • . 165;1411.$4.acio G z 24 T23N R4E E 1/2 .,„ • 01/16/90 . _ •_ .. . .. , ') ' :;i:i'. 44 CITE DF RENTON Wi "�; City Clerk Jesse Tanner,)Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 2 a, 1999 Ike Nw.nkwo Growth Management Division Dept. of Community, Trade & Economic Dev. PO Bo 48300 Olympi , WA 98504I 8300 Re: R zone Ordinance No. 4779 - Dear r. Nwankwo: Enclos d find a copy 'of the above mentioned ordinance. It was adopted by the Renton(City Counci on April 26, 1999 and goes into effect on May 5, 1999. If you have any questions, please call me at (425) 430-6521. Sincer ly, J71,tc ,u,rn-e? ►✓ Michele Neumann Recor s Management Coordinator Enclos re 105 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 -(425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CIT' OF RENTON eLLf ` City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen • April 2:, 1999 Mr. L: oy Knopp, Mapping Supervisor KC Ad in. Bldg., 709A Depart ent of Assessments 500 - 4 h Avenue/MS 7A Seattle WA 98104- /384 Re: R;zone Ordinance's No. 4779 - Dear r. Knopp: Enclos-d find a copy of the above mentioned ordinance. It was adopted by the Renton City Counc'1 on April 26, 1999;land goes into effect on May 5, 1999. If you have any questions, please all me at (425) 430-6521. Sincer-ly, Michel- Neumann Recors s Management Coordinator 1 Enclos re • I i 105' South Grady ry - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer April 26, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 147 ' The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance#4778 An ordinance was read amending Section 6-2-3 of Chapter 2,Air Guns,of Title • Police: Air Gun Exception re: VI(Police Regulations)of City Code by adding an exception relating to the Migratory Bird Control control of migratory birds. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ.* Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler reiterated her request for.information'on whether the use of air guns will impact any other birds besides the Canada geese. Mayor Tanner noted that the airport already employs a gas cannon,the purpose of which is to discourage any birds—not just the Canada geese—from nesting in the vicinity of the airport. *ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ' . Ordinance#4779 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of approximately Rezone: Pierre Grady Way 2.74 acres located at SW Grady Way between Oakesdale and Powell Avenues Site from CO to IM,R-98-126 SW from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(IM); Pierre rezone, R-98-126. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. EXECUTIVE .ESSION MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 8:40 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers present. ADJOURNM NT MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,COUNCIL • ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:11 p.m. MARIL J. TERSEN,CMC, City Clerk ' Recorder: Brenda Fritsvold Apri126, 1999 • , , i April 19, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 137 Resolution#3386 ' A resolution was read authorizing the Fire Chief to enter into an agreement to '' Fire: Confined Space&Dive provide mutual aid for confined space and emergency dive team services ;i Team Rescue ervices,City of between the City of Bellevue and the City of Renton for confined space rescue Bellevue and emergency dive team capabilities. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED ' BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. 'I Resolution#3 87 A resolution was read authorizing the Fire Chief to enter into an operational Fire:Marine scue statement of understanding between the King County Police Department and Agreement,Ki g County the Renton Fire Department concerning the use of marine rescue equipment ;i ' Marine Patrol ivision and personnel. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON,' COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. . Resolution#3388 A resolution was read authorizing the Fire Chief to enter into a memorandum of ,i Fire: Puget Sound Urban agreement between Pierce County,the City of Renton and the Puget Sound Search&Rescue Task Force Urban Search&Rescue Task Force. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED (Renton Participation) BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution#3 89 A resolution was read authorizing the Fire Chief to enter into interlocal, ;i ' Fire: Emergency Response agreements entitled "Public Works Emergency Response Mutual Aid ' Mutual Aid Agreements Agreement." MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS„ COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 4/26/99 for second and final reading: , Police:Air Gun Exception re: An ordinance was read amending Section 6-2-3 of Chapter 2,Air Guns,of Title ,� Migratory Bird Control VI(Police Regulations)of City Code by adding an exception relating to the control of migratory birds. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 4/26/99. CARRIED. ' Prior to second and final reading on this ordinance next week,Councilmember 'j Keolker-Wheeler wanted information on whether the use of air guns will impact any other birds besides the Canada geese. ,i Rezone:Pierr. Grady Way An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of approximately , Site from CO o IM,R-98-126 2.74 acres located at SW Grady Way between Oakesdale and Powell Avenues ,� SW from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(IM);Pierre rezone, R-98-126. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON '' 4/26/99. CARRIED. . The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading: Ordinance#4777 An ordinance was read amending Title IV, Development Regulations,of City Zoning: Centei-s Residential Code by creating a Centers Residential Demonstration Overlay District within Demonstratiorl.Overlay the Center Suburban(CS)and Center Neighborhood(CN)zones, establishing a District modification process within the District, and amending residential use provisions in the Commercial Arterial(CA)zone. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE . ' ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. , ADJO NT MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ; '' ADJOURN. C' 'V' D. Time: 9:07 p.m. , i- -Recorder: Brenda Fritsvold MARIL J. ' TERSEN,CMC, City Clerk I CIT7 OF RENTON if `'; City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen March 16, 1999 James and Barbara Pierre • 941' Crystal Lake Road Woos inville, WA 918072 Re: James Pierre Rezone Application (SW Grady Way @ Oakesdale Avenue SW); File No. R-988-126 De. Mr. and Mrs. Pierre: At t e regular Council meeting of March 15, 1999, the Renton City Council approved the reco endation of the Planning and Development Committee to revise the Hearing Exa iner's recommendation regarding the rezone request and the site plan. A copy of the `lanning and Development Committee report is enclosed for your information. Plea.e feel free to call if further information or assistance is needed. Sinc-rely, • Maril `.1 tersen City Clerk cc: I ayor Jesse T niter ouncil President King Parker ana Huerter,Dievelopment Services Division icki Morris, 7732 18th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98115-4426 Enc osure 105 South.Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 0. 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 15, 1999 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p. . MINUTES Municipal Building CALL TO O' o ER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN,Council President Pro tern;DAN CLAWSON;KATHY COUNCILME ERS KEOLKER-WHEELER;BOB EDWARDS;TIMOTHY SCHLITZER. ii.B MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KING PARKER AND TONI NELSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF N JESSE TANNER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE LARRY WARREN,City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN,City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ' SUSAN CARLSON,Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Administrator;BETTY NOKES,Director of Economic Development; JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator;NEIL WATTS,Plan Review Supervisor;ABDOUL GAFOUR,Water Utility Supervisor;KAREN ' MARSHALL,Human Services Manager; DENNIS CONTE,Housing Assistance Specialist;DEREK TODD,Finance Analyst; COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, Police Dept tuient. PRESS Denis Law,Renton Reporter Claire Booth, South County Journal APPROVAL OF MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY EDWARDS,COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 1999 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMA ION A proclamation by Mayor Tanner was read declaring March 18, 1999 to be Absolutely Incr dible Kid Day "Absolutely Incredible Kid Day"in the City of Renton,and declaring the —March 18, 19 9 children of Renton to be absolutely incredible kids. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Dennis Conte,Housing Assistance Specialist,reported that First Savings Bank Human Service: First Savings of Renton has announced its intention to award the City a grant to be used for Bank Grant to ousing Repair Renton's Human Services Housing Repair Assistance Program. Saying that the 1 Program bank made an earlier grant of$25,000 to this program in 1997,Mr. Conte said ' many low-income Renton residents received both minor and emergency home repairs as a result of the previous grant. Services provided include exterior painting and replacement of water heaters and furnaces. Harry Blencoe,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of First ' Savings Bank of Renton, officially presented the City with another$25,000 grant to be used by the housing repair program. Mayor Tanner then presented a plaque of appreciation to Mr.Blencoe on behalf of the City, saying that the bank's generous donations to this program are an outstanding example of corporate citizenship. APPEAL Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Planning&D velopment regarding the Pierre Grady Way rezone(SA-98-126). The Committee Committee convened on March 11, 1999 to consider the appeal from the Hearing Appeal: Pierre Grady Way ' Examiner's report dated November 19, 1998. The subject property is located March 15, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 89 Rezone, SA-98-126 on the north side of SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW. The applicant seeks a rezone from commercial office(CO)to medium industrial(IM). Additionally,the Hearing Examiner rendered a decision,in the event the rezone was permitted,relating to the site plan. Rezone Recommendation: On the appeal of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation regarding the rezone,the committee found that the Hearing Examiner did not give appropriate consideration to land use policies of the Comprehensive Plan and/or alternative mechanisms to accomplish the land use policies of the City. The committee found that the Hearing Examiner did not consider how the proposed use of this parcel represents a "balance of uses"that would not only improve the City's economic and employment bases,but would increase the City's tax base and improve the efficiency in the use of this parcel. This is particularly so on this unusual site. The committee found that the subject site has unique problems. These problems are due to the shape and size of this parcel, and to the power lines that run down the middle of the site. The committee also found that the Hearing Examiner's report recommended denial of the rezone because,among other things,the proposed development could be abandoned at some point in time and,once rezoned, other less desirable uses for this location may be permitted. The committee found that there are mechanisms, such as a restrictive covenant or a development agreement,that will address this concern. Those alternatives were not explored by the Hearing Examiner. Site Plan Decision: On the appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the site plan,the committee found the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of law insofar as he imposed a condition on the site plan that is duplicative of the City's inherent power. The imposition of a condition stating that the City has absolute discretion to modify driveway access to the site would render superfluous the City's inherent power to regulate the location of driveways. That is a substantial error. Therefore,this condition should be removed. Requested Council Action Rezone: The Committee recommended that Council approve the requested rezone from CO to IM, subject to three conditions: Condition#1 —that the applicant sign a covenant restricting the use of this . parcel to the development as proposed,including any future related expansion on the same site; Condition#2 —that the restrictive covenant meets with the approval of the City Attorney;and Condition#3 —that the applicant complies with all conditions imposed by the ERC. Site Plan: The committee recommended that Council amend the decision of the Hearing Examiner regarding the site plan and strike condition#2 relating to the City's authority to modify driveway access to and from the site, as this is an inherent power of the City and not a special condition applicable only to this site. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. APPROVED BY Cyr COUNCIL Date 3 -/s—9 PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT March 15, 1999 Pierre-Grady Way Appeal File LUA-098-126-SA-H,R. (Referred January 4, 1999) • The lanning and Development Committee convened on March 11, 1999 to consider the appe 1 from the Hearnng Examiner's report dated November 19, 1998. The subject prop rty is located on ithe north side of Southwest Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave ue SW and Powell Avenue SW. The applicant seeks a rezone from commercial offic (CO) to medium industrial (IM). Additionally, the hearing examiner rendered a deci ion, in the event the rezone was permitted,relating to the site plan. REZONE RECOMMENDATION: On t e appeal of th hearing examiner's recommendation regarding the rezone, the co ittee finds that the hearing examiner did not give appropriate consideration to land use olicies of the Comprehensive Plan and/or alternative mechanisms to accomplish the land se policies of the City. I The ommittee finds that the hearing examiner did not consider how the proposed use of this arcel represents a"balance of uses"that would not only improve the City's econ mic and employment bases, but would increase the City's tax base and improve the efficiency in the use o'f this parcel. (See policy LU-212-11.) This is particularly so on this unusual site. j The ommittee finds that the subject site has unique problems. These problems are due to th shape and size of this parcel and the power lines that run down the middle of this site. The ommittee also finds that the hearing examiner's report recommends denial of the rezone because, among other things, the proposed development could be abandoned at some point in time (see conclusion#4), and once rezoned, other less desirable. uses for this location may be permitted. The council committee finds that there are mechanisms, such as a restrictive covenant or a development agreement, that will address this concern. Tho e alternatives were not explored by the hearing examiner. • 1 . I • 1 /Atet- TeAZA- I - Plann'ng and Development nmittee Report Page SIT; PLAN DECISIION: On t e appeal of thel hearing examiner's decision regarding the site plan, the committee finds the hearing examiner has committed a substantial error of law insofar as he has imp•sed a condition ou the site plan that is duplicative of the City's inherent power. The imp•sition of a condition stating that the City has absolute discretion to modify driveway acce s to the site would render superfluous the City's inherent power to regulate the locat on of driveways! That is a substantial error. Therefore,this condition should be rem•ved. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION Rezone: The committee recommends that the city council approve the requested rezone from CO to IM subject to three conditions. • Condition#1 - that the applicant sign a covenant restricting the,use of this parcel to the development as proposed including any future related I '. expansion on the same site. • Condition#2 - that the restrictive covenant meets.with the approval of the City Attorney. • Condition#3 —that the applicant comply with all conditions imposed by the ERC. Site Plan: The con ImIittee recommends that the council amend the decision of the hearing examiner regarding the site plan and strike condition#2 relating to th- City's authority to modify driveway access to and from the site as this is an inherent power of the City and not a special condition applicable only to this site. � Kathy Keollfer-Wh I eler, Chair tic1,L.,1 Dan Clawson,Member Tim Schlitzer,Member Pro Te I I Pierre-Grady/maa 3-15-'9 I � { ,r,' .....- CI 1 OF RENTON `°'��` Hearing Examiner Jesse Tann ,Mayor Fred J.*aufman Febru 25, 1999 ` . :.. .. • CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 6 1999 Meinbe s,Renton City Council 1055 S rady Way RECEIVED • Renton WA 98055 . - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. Re: 'ierre/Grady:Way Rezone and Site Plan UA98-126,SA-H,R Dear C o uncilmembers: First, I .pologize for any;.delay caused by the confusing language of the report and reco endation on the matter. This o ice believes that the requested reclassification is inappropriate,thereby making that the prim. recommendation. If the City Council wishes to approve the reclassification,they may '. desire to impose limitations on the range of uses,but this office could not clearly draw such distinct ons and did not make any recommendations in that regard. The alt"rnative was really intended to reach a useful conclusion regarding a site plan. Normally, if this o lice recommends denial of a rezone it does not make any decision on the site plan. That would ave unnecessarily delayed the applicant's project if the City Council does overturn the reco endation to deny the rezone. I hope t is letter helps clarify the issues and',want to thank you for providing an opportunity to respon 1. If this o fice can be of any further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincere-y, • Fred J. aufrnan Hearin Examiner cc: anetta Fontes, Assistant City Attorney ' :�e�.8Pf ose lleve ppment,Services • 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 ., ,? CIT` 3F RENTON Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren i e., /1,1.te 14-:Ili ifii&Z February 23, 1999 Mr. Fred Kaufman Hear.ng Examiner City of Renton RE: Pierre/Grady Way Rezone& Site Plan LUA-98-126, SA-H, R j . Dear Mr. Examiner: This matter tt is currently pending on appeal before the Planning and Development Committee. Your office previously issued a recommendation on the rezone application and a proposed recommendation on the site plan if the rezone is approved. . Dun g the review of your report the Committee was uncertain of your intentions relating . to the last portion of paragraph one of the conclusion's section of your report, at page six. You ate: The requested classification is not justified and should not be approved by the City Council Since an entire Site Plan was predicated on the approval of a, reclassification)of the subject site,this office will provide an alternative recommendation in the event the City Council approves the reclassification of the subject site to IM as proposed by the applicant. (emphasis added) i I hav- underlined the language that the Committee seeks to have.clarified. The confusion stem• from the phrase "alternative recommendation." The is i entified language appears in the conclusion under the title "Rezone." Your office makes recommendations on rezones and renders decisions on site plans. Therefore, your phras "alternative recommendation"was interpreted by the Committee as referring to the r zone rather than the site plan. If the Council decides to approve the rezone there will be no remand to your office. • Ther fore,there will be no opportunity for your office to provide a recommendation ' • regar ing the rezone that is different from the one you have provided in your report. Is the e some recommendation, other than the'one provided in your report,that you think . shoul be conveyed to the Council? If so,the Committee would like to have that information in order to',consider it. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678� - This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Mr.F ed Kaufman 02/23/99 Page-2 The I ommittee is asking that you clarify this aspect of your report. The Committee has conti ued the appeal haring. The Committee is aware that you typically have two weeks to res I ond;however, it is asking that you respond to this inquiry by March 3`d so that it can r;sume the appeal hearing on March 4th, 1999. Your cooperation and courtesies on this r-quest will be gi•eatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Zanetta L. Fontes Assistant City Attorney ZLF: a • cc: Kathy Keolker iWheeler Tim Schlitzer ; Dan Clawson Pete Rosen • I ••• i-�= CIT.' OF RENTON _ l Renton City Council Jesse Tanner, Mayor Janu-ry 6, 1999. APP: AL FILED BY James and Barbara Pierre ,Representative: Vicki Morris of Vicki Morris Consulting • Services i RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/19/98 denying the zoning reclassification,'of the site, located at SW Grady Way between.Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW, from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R. To P.;rties of Record: The "fanning and Development Committee will meet to review the subject appeal on: Thursday, February 18, 1999 ' 4:00 PM Council Chambers ' _ Seventh Floor Renton City Hall ' 1055 S. Grady Way This is not a public hearing, but a working session of the Planning and Development Com ittee. As all Council committee meetings are open to the public, you are welcome to att nd. Consideration of the appeal shall be based solely upon the written record previ usly established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could - not r asonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. The Committee will submit a written recommendation to the full Council for their consideration at a regular Monday night Council meeting. If yot., have questions regarding this meeting, please phone Julia Medzegian, the Council Liaison, at 425-430-6501.. Sinc rely, 1 KathyKeolker-Wheeler, Chair Plan ing and Development Committee 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6501 . January 4, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 8 development meets the City's regulations, it should be allowed and not further restricted. Also,he did not believe that the proposed expansion would change the character of the neighborhood. Mrs.Keolker-Wheeler replied that if any precedent is being set by the agreement pertaining to the Conrad parcels, it is that a developer,the City, and affected residents can work together to reach an agreement which is acceptable to all interested parties. Responding to Councilman Edwards,Mike Kattermann,Director of Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning, said that any development agreement for the Taco Time property would be the subject of a public hearing before the City Council prior to its being approved. *Moved by Keolker-Wheeler,seconded by Schlitzer,Council concur in the majority committee report as presented. Roll call: two ayes(Keolker-Wheeler, Schlitzer); four nays(Parker, Clawson,Edwards,Nelson). Motion failed. **MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MINORITY COMMITTEE REPORT AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council President Parker noted the addition of item 6.j.,described on page 9. Court Case: CRT-98-015, Court Case filed on behalf of Local 32 of the United Association of Plumbers&Pipefitters Union Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry alleging v.Renton, et al. that NW GM Contractors (a subcontractor on the City Hall remodel project) has not paid required wages,nor made required monthly fringe benefit contributions to Union employees. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Appeal: Pierre rady Way City Clerk submitted appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision denying a zoning Rezone fromco to IM, SA- reclassification from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(lM)for 98-126 the Pierre Grady Way site located on SW Grady Way between Oakesdale and Powell Avenues SW; appeal filed on 12/30/98 by Vicki Moms,representing James and Barbara Pierre (File No. SA-98-126). Refer to Planning& Development Committee. Vacation:Lak View Blvd City Clerk submitted petition for street vacation of a portion of Lake View (104th Ave SE$ Blvd. (104th Ave.SE)located east of Lake Washington Blvd. and south of NE Martindale/\'AC-98-004 20th St.;petition submitted by James S.Martindale, 9712 237th Pl. SW, Edmonds, 98020 (VAC-98-004). Refer to Board of Public Works; set a public hearing for January 25, 1999 to determine the advisability of the vacation. (See page 11 for resolution setting the public hearing.) Plat: Estates at(Hidden Creek, Development Services Division recommended approval, with condition, of the Final (NE 8th S/Chelan P1 Estates at Hidden Creek Final Plat; 10 single family lots on 1.73 acres in the NE),FP-98-154 vicinity of NE 8th St. and Chelan Pl.NE (FP-98-154). Council concur. (See page 11 for resolution.) Planning:R-10 and R-14 Zone Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Department Changes recommended amendments to the R-10 and R-14 zones to: promote small lot development; resolve Code conflicts and clarify fencing and buffering requirements for commercial uses; and incorporate a definition system that classifies single family as traditional detached and semi-attached, and multi- family as including townhouses and flats. Refer to Planning&Development Committee. CITY( RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: to ib . I. SiIBMITTING D•TA: FOR AGENDA OF: 01/04/99 Dept/Div/Boar s....City Clerk Staff Contact.... ....Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX S1IIBJECT: I Public Hearing Appeal of Hear.' g Examiner's Decision denying the zoning Correspondence reclassification .f the site,located at SW Grady Way between Ordinance Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave SW,from CO to IM. Resolution File No. LUA-91.-126,SA-H,R. • Old Business EXHIBITS: ! New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Session B. Appeal(12/ 0/98) Other C. Vicki Morri• letter(11/30/98) D. Michael Ba of letter(12/1/98)' E. Hearing Ex. 'ner's Report&,Decision(11/19/98) II I I' RECOMMENDE a ACTION: I APPROVALS: Refer to4Plann. g and Development Committee. I Legal Dept Finance Dept Other II II FJSCAL IMPACT. N/A Expenditure Re"uired Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budget-d Revenue Generated I ! I' SlI MMARY OF A i TION: Appeal filed by ames and Barbai'a Pierre,represented by Vicki Morris of Vicki Morris Consulting Services, accompanied b required fee rece ivied on 12/30/98. ' I I ' I � i,- %o CIT OF RENTON City'Clerk Jesse Tanner Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen i F De•ember 30, 1998 AP"EAL FILED Y: James and Barbara Pierre Representative: Vicki Morris of Vicki Morris Consulting Services RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/19/98 denying the zoning reclassification of the site, located at SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and File Ave SW, from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R. To 'arties of Record: Pur.uant to Title IU, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hea 'ng examiner's decision denying reclassification of the above referenced site has been file' with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-16.B., within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt Of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent document wit be reviewed Uy the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secetary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and De elopment Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wis to attend the Meeting, please call the Council,secretary at 425 430-6501 for inf rmation. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for r consideration by he full Counci at_a subsequent Council meeting. Att ched is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of hearing examiner dec'sions or reconnrmendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the me 'ts of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a ' sho ing can be !ade that additional evidence could not reasonably have been.available at t e prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on thi• matter will be accepted by the City Council. Fo additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425 430-6502. Sin erely, . / /M.1 'lyn J.l Vietosen, CMC Ci , Clerk Att.chment 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER -- CITY OF RENTON .APPE- OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO TON CITY COUNCIL. F iENO. LUA-9:-126, SA-H,lz uGC ,3 01998 RECEIVED APPLICATION TAME: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale CITY The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use He ring Examiner, dated November!' 19 19 98 , 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTYI APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: James and Barbara Pierre Name: Vicki Morris Address: 9419 Crystal Lake Road Address: . Vicki Morris Consulting Sevices Woodinville, WA 98072 7732 ..18th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98115-4426 Telephone No. (206) 364=220,0 Telephone No. (206) 522-8057 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific elrrors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: CONCLUSION: ' , (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 2 Error: "Appearance" that applicant is looking for an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier requests to extend the Auto Mall Improvement district to include this rite were rejected. j 1 Correction: The uito Mall designation was never requested for this site. , Communi- ca ions with staff since 1996 concerning the appropriatezone to requelst for the si e have consistently pointed to IM. See VMCS letter 11/30/98 and attachments. CONCLUSIO 'S: No. 4 E or: "If IM zoning is approved, there is nothing that requires the uses proposed by the applicant. The gasoline and rental car aspect could be abandoned. Ma y plans . . . submitted, reviewed and approved are abandoned on a regular.basis. Correction: Mr. Pierre is not requesting a speculative rezone. Considerable invest- me is have been made to prepare permit-application-level drawings to epedite implementation of the proposal. An unreasonable generalization is applied in OTHER: DECI SION Conclusion #4. No. 2 E or: "The Cit shall have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from th- site as necessary, including both the driveway along Grady and the easement driveway/accese in the northeast corner of the subject site." Correction: The City shall "coordinate and confirm acceptance of access to and L fr.m the site, as necessary to serve proposed uses" . . . Se- Dykeman Architects letter 12/01/98.- 3 SUMMARY (IF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach expl. ation,if desired) 4 • X Rev-rse the decision orirecommendation and grant the following relief: 'IM rezone X M...fy the decision or recommendation as follows: Coordinate/confirm access 'to/from"the site Re • d to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Oth"r • `- Pic16,, 2O'/1ST4/ December 30, 1998* Appellant/Repres-ntative Signature Date z'' Note: Fir..t "appealed" by correspondence dated 11/30/98 and 12/01/98 referred 1to above. OTE: Please refer o Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. he ppeal.doc j i City of Renton Ci Code ,.• Ti le IV-Buildin i. Chapter 8 -Hea g Examiner Section 16 Appe: 4- -16: APPEAL Unless an ordinan - providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved b the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a folrm furnished•by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14)calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of a s peal shall be ac •mpanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) . The written otice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s)in fact or law which in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile filing of a notice.of appeal is authorized pursuant to the condit ons detailed in Renl on City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord.4353,6-1-92). :. Within five(s)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the l receipt of the appeal. Oth-r parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within.ten(10) days of the dates of mailing of the notificat on of the filing of the notice of appeal. Thereupon 'e Clerk shall forward to the members of the City.Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or ecommendation,findings_and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal, and additional letters sub tted by the parties.,(Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) . No public h:aring shall be held by the City Council, No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City'Counc' unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reaso}rably have been available at e time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council ma remand the ma4ei to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearvrg record shall be borne by th; appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional e 'dense or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Co cil,and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-93) E. The conside ation by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and dditional submissions by parties. F. If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8 1'10A and after examinatio of the record,tlw Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceed' g to Examiner for reconsideration,or modify,or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. , G. If,upon ap eal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-1 OB or C,and r examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,o that a reco endation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section.4-8-1 OB c C. H. In any eve ,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusion, other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the rec?rd. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) heappeaLdoc VIC1 MO RRI S CITY OF RENTON �, .CO SULTING SE ICES DEC 301998 =ti�� ifo , ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE RECEIVED � u � � i CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I'ROP05AL PREPARATION �.,.- 7i;•3„„!If, %�� .,na. I PERMIT ASSISTANCE Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk December 30, 19`8 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale, File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Dear Ms. Peterson: Enclosed is the written appeal form and appeal fee ($75.00) for the Pierre Grady Way site at Oakesdale Avenue SW. This letter is to confirm that in several conversations I have had with you since December 8, 19918, you have advised that my original correspondence (dated November 30, 1998), and that of Dykeman Architects (dated December 1 1998), objecting to the Hearing Examiner's rezone recommendation and conditions of Site Plan Approval, were recognized as an "appeal" in this case. We had been advised by staff that a formal appeal of a Hearing Exa{niner recom endation was not necessary, since it was not a decision. However, you confirmed that current .City procedureI .(under consideration for revision) does require a formal appeal. Therefore, even thougJi the date on the enclosed written appeal is December 30, 1998, the action was ini iated within the statutory 14-day appeal period which commenced on November 19, 1998. I confi ed in telephone conversation with you yesterday that you have both of the letters referreii to above, anci attachments, and will copy these to accompany the written appeal to be provid;d to City Council members. If you find that you do require any of these documents, please ontact me and I will be happy to provide them. It is m understanding of City procedure (based on conversations with you) that Mr. Pierre and project representative do not need to be present at the January 4th City Council hearing at which this ca.e will be listed on a "Consent Agenda" for referral to the Planning & Development Comm ttee. We understand that you will send written notification of the date on which We will have t e opportunity to discuss the matter with the Planning&Development Committee. Thank h ou for your assistance with sending forms and helping us to understand City procedures in this m.tter. Sincer:ly, . j Vicki orris 7732 18TH AVENUE NORTHEAST • SEATTLE, WA 98115-4426 • FAX: (206) 523-4648 • PHONE: (206) 522-8057 1 1 -- -...:Y.. ! VICI. ' = : MORRIS 1 ; ij CONSULTING a • :': SE VICES XN'IitiI � : 1it,L , ENVIR NMENTAL COMPLIANCE i iiip t*e. r< PROPOSAL.PREPARATION •��•r, 4, 11, PERMIT ASSISTANCE Membe s of the City Council November 30, 1998 City of ' enton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON Re: ierre Grady ay Site @ Oakesdale, File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H,R DEC 0 1 1998 bjection to Recommendation Against IM Rezone RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Ci y Council Me biers: i I am w 'ting on behalf of James and Barbara Pierre, property owners and.applicants for Rezone and Sit Plan Approval, to express disagreement with the Hearing Examiner's recommendation dated ovember 19, 1998. The Hearing Examiner has recommended against the request for IM zoning n a 2.74-acre site in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Oakesdale Avenue SW with S Grady Way. We have been advised by staff that it is not necessary to appeal the Hearing Examiner's recommendation because it is not a decision. It is our understanding that the City Co ncil is the decron maker for the rezone request. We look forward to working with the Plannin & Development Committee to answer any questions and discuss this project in more detail. , I summ rize below the history of this request, and point out erroneous assumptions contained in the Hea ing Examiner's recommendation. S I Mr. Pie e and members of the consultant team have met with staff and maintained frequent communications to confirm appropriate and acceptable uses for this property since the latter half of 199 . Mr. Pierre's communications have been with Sue Carlson, Economic Development Directo . He also me with the Planning Commission during their consideration of Lance Use Code a endments to allow mini-marts with gasoline service stations in the IM zone. The Purpos statement for these Land Use Code amendments, as stated in the Commission briefing paper d ted December 30, 1997 reads as follows: "The p rpose of the amendments is to allow for gas stations and uses commonly associatedwith them su h as mini-marts' auto repair,fast foot restaurants and car washes in a consistent and logical annex. The work program has come in part due to inquiries from a property owner [Mr. Pi rre]who is interested in requesting a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Industrial- Mediu (IM), and developing a gas station and mini-mart as well as an auto leasing business along rady Way." I i 7732 18TH VENUE NORT-1EAST • SEATTLE, WA 98115-4426 • FAX: (206) 523-4648 • PHONE: (206) 522-8057 r � I Member of the Renton Gity Council Re: Pie re Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File No. UA-98-126, SA H, R November 30, 1998 To the test of my knowledge, the Land Use Code amendments were unanimously approved, with full aw•reness of the p7osal for.the Pierre Grady Way site at SW Grady Way/Oakesdale Avenue SW. My co unications have been with Jana Huerter, Land Use.Supervisor; Rebecca Lind, Lisa Grueter and Don Erickson in the Office of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning; and wi ih Peter Rosen and Mark Pywell in Development Services. Other members o' the consult.nt team have communicated closely with Neil Watts and Paul Lumbert.in Public Works conce ng the stormw.ter management proposal, earthwork, utilities, traffic and circulation.' Mr. Pierre hi s been successful in attracting a Chevron gasoline station with mini mart, and Enterprise rental c,r agency/used car sales as tenants for the site. The City has adopted Land Use Code and Compr• ensive Plan amendments over the course of.the past year that have narrowed the availabl- zoning for these uses on the subject site to Medium Industrial. These actions have been taken ith full aware Iss. of the Pierre Grady Way site .proposal, and apparent intent to acco odate it. The proposed uses are now prohibited in the existing Commercial Office zone. The alt:rnative of seeking Arterial Commercial zoning for the site would require assemblage of a minimu l of 5 acres,.and would constitute a spot zone in this area. Properties east, west and northea.t of the site are zoned IM(see Zoning Map, attached). " The "J stification for Rezone" prepared for this application (copy attached) gives a detailed history •f the changes that have occurred since this project was first presented to the City in a Prelimi ary Project Review meeting on January 24, 1997. It also describes !the mutual coordin:tion between staff and the applicant during the course of these changes. Concer s expressed by the Hearing Examiner that undesirable industrial uses could potentially be develo•ed on the site ender IM zoning seem to the applicant to be unfounded. Mr. Pierre is not request ng a speculative rezone, but rather submitted a complete application for concurrent Site Plan A•proval. Signif cant investments of time and money have been made to develop t, site plan to the degree required to respond to City of Renton detailed Site Plan Approval require I ents. Neither the owner/applicant, nor Chevron or Enterprise is likely to walk away'from these i estments. Mr! Pierre would not have proceeded with this level of detailed planning and commit ent to tenants vnthout evidence in the form of supportive staff comments along the way that the project was acceptable and welcome at this location. Mr. Ka fman's Conclusion #2 (page 6 of the November 19, 1998 Report, Recommendation and Decisio document) reflects an erroneous assumption. He states that "It would appear that the applica t is looking for an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier requests to extend he Auto Mall Inprovement district to include this site were rejected." I was encouraged in Mar h 1998 by Rebecca Lind to inquire about, draft Land Use Code amendments being conside ed for an Automall designation for properties fronting SW Grady Way. At her reco 'endation, I contacted Don Erickson, and obtained information on Automall'B permitted 2 1 Member of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale • j File No. UA-98-126, SA-H, R Novemb r 30, 1998 I. uses an development standards. I reported this information to Mr. Pierre and the design team. We invelstigated whether'the provisions of the Automall overlay might be less restrictive and thus make site planning somewhat easier. We were invited, early in the process, to request the Automall designation concurrent with a rezone to IM (since only properties zoned IM, IH or CA are included within the Automall expansion area). Mr. Pierre decided not to request the overlay, since it was developed for some other purpose that the uses he proposes. It is my understanding that the City adopted Land Use Code amendments to implement the Automall expansion area in June 1998, prior to submittal of the Pierre Grady Way site application for Rezone and Site Plan Approval on August i$,, 1998. I received a follow up communication from Don Erickson on August 1, 1998 that the opportunity to request this overlay had likely passed (a copy of which I provide to the Hearing Examiner), but Mr. Pierre had long since eliminated it from his conside ation. I' I Informa ion conveyed to me by Don Erickson indicated that the.Pierre Grady Way siie at 11 Oakesd'le was excluded from the Automall B designation purely because of existing CO zoning, not for ny other reason as speculated in the Hearing Examiner's.Conclusion #3 (page 7 of the Novem er 19, 1998 Report, Recommendation and Decision document). During our three. ears of com unication with staff concerning this project, we have been assured that the option to request n IM rezone was available, since adjacent properties east and west along SW Grady Way are zon d IM, as is the industrial park northeast of the site along Powell Avenue SW. The de elopment poteiitiial of this small parcel is significantly constrained by it's narrow width, unusual shape, and fragmentation caused by electrical power transmission easements. When;City develop ent standards arse applied (setbacks, landscaping, and parking requirements), developable area is reduced even further. The property has remained vacant since it was annexed to the City in 1959. The proposed uses are nationally recognized businesses with attractive, well-maintained facilities. Proposed landsi aping exceeds minimum requirements. It seems that the proposal offers a more esirable alternative at the west gateway to the City than a vacant, weed-covered site. ; We respectfully request that you review this letter and attachments, and confirm our communications with staff. We will participate in full Council hearings and in Council committee meetings to respond to any questions you may have concerning this request for Rezone and Site Plan Ap roval. - Sincerel, , . i . I - ' Vicki rris Permit assistance Consultant to James and Barbara Pierre 1 3 Members of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File No. LUA-98-126, SA H,, R Novemb r 30, 1998 Enclos res: 1. Zo 'rig Map 2. Sit Plan 3. Pro ect Narrative( aced 8/24/98) 4. Jus�ification for Rene (dated 8/14/98) cc: ames and Barbara Pierre, Owner/Applicant on Moody,.Western Pacific Properties, Inc. ke Barthol, Dykeman Architects ana Huerter, City of Renton Land Use Supervisor it eter Rosen, City; of Renton Senior Planner • i r i 4 , i', ' F2 - 13 TA23N R4E E 1/2 ,, M ! r) j I i _..I.M . co , ! S 7th St.' , . r ccP l CO \ i - - D. i 1 (/) IMF �I--- 01\%?•----. . __C15\ __'______ ___ ______! 2 . II • ; A\-to :� 1 Si , C P. 1 , 1N• -.. / �' � i \Pti�\ . • - I Sw L I --:A-\ r/7" -. . rI M /1 i. � � , N )'‘\. .I°°I°I I I I*H I 1 I I I-405 N; 11 IM . I! z I M \ I SW*1 16th St: • _---1 SW' i \ • ---,.... \• ..0 Ell i .im• ' A: .... . .... .._: . \ 1 I ! 1 C0 I • . j . • I ) . . 1 I ► ( �` CI ki •• I I • .. ! ram;. _-__ �. .. _....__..` ` HZ • 25 TZ3N R4E E 1/2 9 0 : 4 , i~, ZONING 3i40°° v 2 r/arew 1ca1.seances 24 T23N R4E E 1/2 FN.cO/ O1/16?8 I • U \ .. NE I•/4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.nr\. (..._• f. A — \ ---------------_--- 101112I1Li INI— \ 00.12 WATER M: ., �. I SRe{'� 5YM 'OL5 'OP OF \ '—~ y \ OW 1,Ar5R 55P_RATOe B• OFF\ •\' /VA.\^ pC� X. 1\ a- _----------._---'-'''------- L) FRG :alv+r % \ r" ' t ^l4_/: \ Zj / Q U k \ 0 6.475 •L,5 §j Ca:LTRG DDA 111e•prpe / .fi••^ • ------- '\ �LJ ----\- d Btoaa Off Vt.s - ...nr•:+M.. \ \\.1, -��i�—!= — — — - — erw e�eA r_ns+-A, r — \ \--- J JRr6A.A:..;',:•�51 "-7.s ,:...n raw, .d:vim...'" t F'_A 'r•r9'r Accc•4 Il.c� -. e1 ve 1-e r Sae, �1 - ---- -\ - ao N "--b- - ~1------ -0-- \\ 1 �•^ 5275A \ \ \ g ATER we^R c• _ \ i^� ye t, -=_ y� 14 S..eKc \ • - -Y If \ :rx.+Ge.0x5erau a e:or- o. I _ " } p1dmd _ __- ? - Q - • "'/' L\ P •ASTN'OI'l�V v.GR POn•Jt i : ..ys = I se Ta e•u• \ _ , � may:,Ow -;•-a-.• SAL 11e is o�•� a,{ \ 1 1 11 1 1 �r •• •t `\..rxA� y�J /; \ \ - - e1 R� i q r yv�+•',� rj i _ ``• \ r 5,reeR / .• \, ~:%�, ,+� • r .e •^�.-.':'., ebb. :1.�.:. ;�� ca A _____,•-� /ly i ��o • i i...^ / - '•'i 1 t /�o % i ►. j 1•'1i •• - �y •� �,/�2�-- i 5 ... amok;w.o,a... S \6� \ _ J:�5+ •fd Yd' '�1T•\11• '.@ titl ,\�%1� % �� �-1� :� cc11 _pe:'� pr.r py:au• I art•1-K 5 r.n Eby \ / �` `' /------------------ � i 1 1 t '•f):;,_•1 jam, d ± 1'• ,` �'•"5 a' _••�SCAr Srrcx eAr sec�� 113 1___ '•\ - .� w t-�'1ill ,mod L. 1. �/' ' \ter' .. r„p�l.tip;.• fn i� ,� _'c-�y5 sNP( / SITE PLAN NOTES I UIll u_ ?, \ -: ti `(r y;$ 41 r5 �.-.�'- .'.i a % ciikpv i /i i. I oi�cc'e'°r:;.n;p.tl.ne ^ 0 ��'\ \ \ y`\i •g_ + •F r ,/ yw fa,farm. 7 0 Dyed g/'• _eIli' pa .� � % Irasn Enen., `l O \\'\ \ :a'.5.cA.,5✓r•, i 17 / e. Canopy.c::+::._Ipul rpm OC .\ '`\\a -'\ efi-51. \ '•- 5 .5•y �� p71AC•50,5 SJr• ter• b. V.A. ie•Lf 1'of coo ynll3f ClnG ui! •npr Calep. rA1 \ ' `\ \ \ t b;/ r. Enter of•5e e..ee•s rope VJ - \s . // a• ••sump Ce•AS \,`\ i , \2,......k......______\\.°11,52.,.....:.• ry i % T. Coos,.street s gape \�\� ����` 51TE PLAN INFORMATION .3 earett.Il, e . , JrCd a / sew,,r m: D e,r.• ufas.w r' yicrancr S,w ea W3 Sno[n:,.o•:. 9-9.ea.s•i•11 ac s'•n`rA,o.v roe' T- .n,nD iaw,.r[ .n. rD, .0 a .a ., •<..m. \\ J % p, m,pa ¢se ,�[Dn.eremn scorer W3 S •cop ,p D'2•2'[ s crgsaeQ \...`JS.tJa.Sa raD,tDoe 110,1•m a / \ \ b 55r5KR .. ,,, nD 11,0 r[:nn. erE590 .15.5: 1 Ent,c•se Car,rental/Was•I.D r.-,t•Cn1 +1a:q'a;t[ D.rp t . 0 ' .-:,D� r ,,prnsp 1[Ila,^CI ii ff r R)1 ora[laatsrtts / e� / •./ era se-•a oo.ace n «,Arn11 pM.:7 se! Ear��rl .. 8J'•�•a�Dar•eD r.sr a % •' �' a. :gu spw•ea�' c.', ,c., '[met . .Fii nwCe,e n:geF- ' w Een.a C Sc•e/Qs 51at�n Cu�lOrryr tiY craDCfae[,•.rnp•I. :•1 • r5t:,'••nj s.a t C P.[feD Co,e• 11 Car at•tl t Car WO ew rpm:, CCDCu,Dar.rep IV a c•t ay.9.9.t \''''' \. / Entnor•fa r.Wani.Danf•wrr c. s •e. se .p••.e'mI...ea• ''�e�`•'a'K > 100 fm +1•a cc t C fs fp.::c ra,l i¢ .-C':Volsta t H / \ S. nt•e•e•T.ct';WA.Due SurIMS:. a 0..1 :a .t•f•. ,r r..• •.t.2.11$1,,,..S •co2 Apes ^ M•Ws Da. ita.5 D tft Inv F•D:Hrt ••nqr(•!1•Afe Tom' ? pr:::tfc L ` 5•[e.a.•r elf.I; 'II••.. is r ss RI CLAT• focal irer.•M Sur la[air 55001 f[.I t.1i5.7f D,trtel S. er Dpc[ee Du:':c.3 narpntr ¢'1• PDMc Nem, .ve.ne Bt 1C. &re•r:srt:a[•t reauirra DE[[ce. ]C''C• A1lD § \ 9 8. >•inapeeur•ervItr 11. Frp:Dts.D'•Ie.np utpsnsr p¢ � cve.c1 wo ec: C^ear ee Mer.•an[a$tor at Ws Moss nI 5 oral r•r1Ce¢3e.,1.of Witlesp t Corer: D •:I L••�AfZ-,,Sf:CE SI15CS sD.rl./tm¢I•4.53 lIl 13. Pane,.i[".••:r -,[A:W:C.7:a J,wn tlT Enle•Dr•sa Ur WnIa I/Ur Wie11 Ir500e 3p.I1.DI r [Dnt lr VClrp•I,car so c.f.. " SITE PLAN \ 4.5 41 sD.t1.3 0e•1.of IR,' own a y..Ap ry EmverN Gm A 10/keyb Car Da•.In¢a ..5 frp ri/1L�to-11. r In ,.5157r.0 ae.l r./Ime1'71.63 INIp 17000 9 r-+CERMIT537X50 EmwwrsarmreDoonseorDaasmp, ,.5vaIut1000se.n.Dfwrrmro Ale1 5fup ap.•l t paCl•fi.t5,lfl �,{ �,yj _ _ _ _ -_-- .ioi.i ry.�;�[apvfrea-I., D,nt ronl 5555 ,":G ii:i��repVlreD ___ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _-_ _ - - - _ _ E eitse np ne+near Lt n[mnont 7b iunn nw .D- o-z.-+e s - I. 1 I Project Narrative Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW i 1I The Pierre Grady Way site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW is 2.74 acres in size (119,354 sf). ',The property fronts on SW Grady Way, and extends east/west between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue ,W. The site has no significant natural features. I I. The Pierre Grady Way site is currently vacant, with the exception of high voltage power lines that pas through in an east/west direction, and north/south electrical distribution lines that convey power f pm the high voltage lines for local use. The metal towers, plinths, wood utility poles, guy wires and guy wire .anchors are fixed features. At the time of this application, the owner''was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound Energy Services to place some power lines underground,;and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated is to bury the east/west power lines from the east end of the opl n drainage channel to Powell Avenue SW, and relocate the north/south power lines offsite to the west. Fill as placed on the Pierre Grady Way property in 1997. City of.Renton Grading License B- 970552 as obtained to bring the site up to grade with surrounding streets and sidewalks.; A subsurface stormwater conveyance system was installed in a former open drainage channel through the property during the fill and grade action. Approximately 100 feet of the open channel,remains at the west en of property, adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. Channel side slopes have been reinforced with gab'on walls. The channel bottom and side slopes have been seeded with grass to provide biofiltrat on— stormwater quality treatment prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. The site is appro ' ately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, and separated from this drainage course by the O esdale Avenue SW right-of-way (a 5-lane section with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides). The roposal includes(constructing a gasoline service station, mini mart (convenience store),'and car rent sales office on tile site with associated utilities, parking and landscaping. Preferred tenants with wh m the owner it negotiating include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The mini mart proposed in the southwest corner of the site will be a one-story building, with a footprint approxi ately 1,300 sf in' size. Four fueling islands are proposed, to be covered by a canopy approxi ately 2,650 sf in area and just under 20 ft high. A building pad approximately 10,000 'sf in size is pr posed on the northern parcel. Initial construction includes building slightly more than half of this single-story structu fe (5,250 sf) at the east end, of the footprint to be occupied by the, car rental/sales operation. The remaining portion of the building footprint area (4,480 sf) is planned'ias a possible future expansion area for the car rental/sales agency, and is not part of the current Site Plan Approva, application. T o tal impervious surface area on the site will be approximately 89,751 sf(75%). Onsite parking is proposed for approximately 168 cars. Ten of these spaces are allocated to the gas stati b n/mini mart, and 'the remaining 158 spaces are proposed for the car rental/sales use. 1 The propose number of parking spaces exceeds City of Renton minimum requirements for the'proposed uses, w ch total 7 spaces for the mini mart and 41 spaces for the car rental/sales use. Based of the applicants long-standing experience in the car sales business, and the proportionately small size of the site for car rental/sales operation, the larger number of spaces is needed. In the event that the 1 I I 'f Enterprise future expansion area is constructed at some future .time, onsite parking for the car rental/s es use will be reduced to approximately 146 spaces — still well above minimum Code require ents and satisfactory for the proposed uses. The additional parking to be provided does not compro 'se any other known Code requirements or site amenities(e.g., landscaping). No onsite vehicle maintenance is contemplated by either Chevron or Enterprise Rent-ai Car. Vehicle ashing is proposed associated with the car rental/sales use only, and will occur in an enclosed garage-'k a room at they rear of the structure, equipped with a drainage collection system that will discharg- to the sanitary sewer. 1 The proposal includes installing two 20,000-gallon UL-rated underground fuel storage tanks associat-d with the gas station use. These will be constructed, installed and operated in accordance with W• hington Department of Ecology standards and other applicable regulations. One 20,000- gallon t. will be used for regular unleaded gasoline. The other 20,000-gallon tank will be segregated into two compartments] approximately 14,000-gallon-capacity for supreme unleaded gasoline and 6,000-g. on-capacity for diesel fuel. The tanks will be double-walled fiberglass construction. ;;The outer w. will provide redundancy to the inner wall, in the event of a spill or leak. A leak detection monitoritig'system will be installed and wired for notification inside the mini mart building. Mini'mart employes will be alerted by this system to potential dangers or leaks associated with the underground fuel stor employees tanks, and will be trained in appropriate emergency response procedures. I Fou new points of driveway access to the site are proposed: two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesd e Avenue SW, and a fourth at the northeast corner of the site. Access to/from Powell Avenue SW will be provided in an existing 20-ft wide easement through the Eagle Hardware corporate Office parking lot. The appl cant requests modification of City of Renton commercial driveway width standard for the westernmost Grady Way driveway apron. In order to accommodate fuel tanker trucks t service the gas station,this driveway is proposed to be 40 feet wide rather than 30 feet. Pub is right-of-way 'landscaping and onsite landscaping to be provided will exceed City of Renton minimum req I i1ements. The proposed Landscaping Plan indicates plantings lover appro •' ately 25 percent (29,603 sf) of the site. The proposal includes landscaping for wildlife, in accorda ce with the City'$ agreement with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service for all development in the reen River Valley. Plants suitable for wildlife habitat are proposed in an 1,area approxi ately 6,590 sf in size, along the northwest L-shaped border with a natural area retained on adja'ent commercial ;property. This area totals 5.5 percent of the Pierre Grady Way'site, compar d to the minimum 2 percent requirement. , II Im lementation of I the proposal will not obstruct views from existing structures. The Extend d Stay of Ame'nca (ESA) hotel adjacent to the northwest corner of the site is a 3- tory structur , oriented in an east/west direction. No significant windows overlook the site to the south. Vegetation ret lined in a natural area used by ESA for stormwater detention substantially screens views between these two properties. An Eagle Hardware corporate office borders the northeast corner of the Pierre Grady Way site. This structure is also three stories high, compared to the one-story car rental/sales office proposed on the Pierre Grady Way site. The car rental/s les office is proposed west of the Eagle Hardware corporate office, between the two offsite t ee-story buildlings. 2 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Gakesdale Project Narrative: Revised 8%24/98 1 I. 1I I Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW :ames and Barbara Lynn Pierre, owners of the Pierre Grady Way site @ Oakesdale A 4lenue SW, request rezone of a 274-acre parcel from CO — Commercial Office, to IM—Medium Industrial, to permit site development for a gas station with mini mart, and car rental/used car sales operation. Tenants with whom they are negotiating for these uses include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The site is located on th1e north side of SW Grady Way, between Oakesdale Avenue SW and PI' well Avenue W, in the Employment Area—Valley designation. Site Zo ing and Comprehensive Plan History ity of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department staff researched the Pierre Grady Way site zoning and.Comprehensive Plan history, and reported this information to a representative of the applicant (see letter to Vicki Morris Consulting Services dated July 23, 1998; copy attached). Staff findings are reported below. Current zoning (CO — Commercial Office) preceded the last Comprehensive Plan amendment and implementing zoning, and the a is no evidence that reclassification to Medium Industrial (IM) zoning has ;been previously considered. ; I i 985-1992. The Comprehensive Plan designation of the site during this period;was Manufa turing Park/Multiple Option. This designation allowed industrial, service commercial and office i ses. Corresponding zoning in 1992 was Office Park on the northern parcel,:' and Manufa turing Park over;the remainder of the site adjacent to the north side of SW.Grady Way. 993. In 1993, the City of Renton issued an interim Comprehensive Plan as a first;step 1. toward adopting Growth Management Act (GMA) policies. At that time, the land' use designa . ion Employment Area—Office was applied to the Pierre Grady Way site, with corresp nding Commerci�1 Office (CO) zoning (Ordinance 4404, June 1993). 994. Puget Power, property owner prior to James and Barbara Lynn Pierre, requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1994, to change the Employment Area—Office designation to Employment Area—Commercial, with corresponding Commercial Arterial (AC) zoning. 1 This request was denied. i. 1995. The City's final GMA Comprehensive Plan update was adopted in 1995. The final • plan ma14ntained the Employment Area—Office designation for the property, with corresponding Comme cial Office (CO) zoning. 1996. A City-initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1996 revised the Pierre Grady Way sit land use designation to Employment Area—Valley. This was an-area-wide amendment affectin nearly all of the valley, for which the purpose was to allow a range of commercial, 9ffice and ind strial zones. Commercial Office zoning was maintained on the Pierre Grady Way site at the tim l of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan amendment. -- 1 I ' 1 Justific ition for Rezone l Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale 1 ' Recent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes n January 24, 1997, James Pierre initiated a Medium Industrial (IM) Rezone and, Site Plan A proval application with the City of Renton by requesting a Preliminary Project Review Meetin . At that time, the site development proposal included a three-story office building on the southw st corner of the property, and a car rental agency in the northern portion. Rezone from CommeF cial Office (CO,) to Medium Industrial (IM).was requested. The. Memorandum of comme t prepared by the City of Renton Long Range Planning staff(February 11,.1997), noted overall onsistency between the proposal and the Comprehensive Plan. The only area of potential inconsi tency was cited 1 as the need to provide safe, convenient pedestrian access from the sidewalk to the proposed;office building—less a matter of Comprehensive Plan inconsistency than a site pl n review comment. ames Pierre carefully considered the appropriate zone to request for the uses for which he had prospective tenans. Over the course of the year following the initial Preliminary Pr;'oject Review meeting, the rental car agency decided against a corporate office on the site,.and James Pierre hitiated communications with a gas station/mini mart tenant for the southwest corner of the property. The ability to permit a gas station, mini mart, and car rental agency was examined in three zones: Commercial Office (existing zoning); Arterial Commercial (CA); and Medium Industrial. Automobile rental/sales is a prohibited use in the CO (existing) zone. CA zoning was geogra hically unavailable to site. The February .11, 1997 Long Range Planning Memo cited Compr hensive Plan Policy LY-212.14, "Favorable consideration should be given to rezones to Comme cial Arterial(CA) only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 27th Street." Therefore, IM zoning was selected. Autom bile rental/leasiing was a primary permitted use, and gasoline service stations were a second ry permitted use subject to Site Plan Approval. There was no mention of mini marts in the IM one text. In the Fall of 1997, discussions were initiated with City of Renton Long Range Planning staff to confirm the appropriate zone to request for the proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses. We learned that a Comprehensive Plan amendment was forthcoming to remove the CA zone geographic; constraint north of I-405 in the Employment Area—Valley designation, on the ondition that rezone applications encompass a minimum of 5 acres. This zone remains unavailable to the Pierrei Grady Way site, which is only 2.74 acres in size. Staff interpretation was re luested concerning the absence of Land Use Code discussion of mini marts in the IM one. Staff ace owledged the riew market trend to develop gas stations with an associated convenience store, a d considered it a possible oversight or need for Code update. They were in the process of assembling City-wide Land Use Code issues related to gas stations, vehicle service, accessory uses, and screening requirements for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Concil. The December 30, 19917 Commission briefing paper disclosed that this work program came about in part ' s a result of inquiries from a property owner [James Pierre] interested in requesting a 2 i, 8,14/98 1 ,I I Justifica ion for Rezone Pierre G ady Way Site @ akesdale rezone from CO to IM to develop a gas station with mini mart and auto.leasing business along Grady Way. The applicant attended Planning Commission meetings in Spring 1998 to answer questiong and provide information. Land Use Code amendments effective April 15,.1998 resulted in the following changes in the zones of interest to the Pierre.Grady Way site: NEW NEW USE CHANGED FROM ZONE PROHIBITED USE ALLOWANCE SECONDARY TO PRIMARY USE Commercial Arterial IGas stations Commercial Office Gas stations Medium industrial Mini marts as primary Gas stations permitted use I. ith the April 15, 1998 Land Use Code amendments, all three proposed uses onl the Pierre G ady Way site are primary permitted uses in the requested IM zone,'and,all are prohibited in,the a sting CO zone. Given the sequence and content of City-wide Comprehensive Plan land Land Us .Code amendments that have occurred between 1996 and the time of this application, each of hich has been supportive of the proposed uses in the requested IM zone at this location, the current application for rezone is timely. In further support of this request, properties eastland west of the site on the north side of SW Grady Way are currently zoned IM, and a considerable amount of IM zoning extends northeastward from the site, above the intersection, of Powell Avenue SW with SW GIrady Way (see the G2 current zoning map that accompanies the July,23, 1998 Ci y of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department letter attached to this Justification for Rezone). Consist ncy with the Comprehensive Plan he City of Renton Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Preliminary Project Review Memorandum concernieg the current Pierre Grady Way Site Rezone request and Site Plan Approval application (April 14, 1998) reported "no inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan," and found that "The proposed commercial uses fall within the range of uses indicated for the [Coprehensive Pln] designation [Employment Area—Valley (EAV)]". The. Memo lists specific Comprehensive Plan policies reviewed in relation to this proposal. These are cited below. Comme is that follow are offered by the applicant. The analysis supports a determination th4 the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested, pursuant to policies set¶orth in the C mprehensive Plan and recent supportive Land Use Code amendments, described above. Policy LU 212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and vary=ty of commercial, ofce, and industrial uses. i; 3 8/14/98 1 II . Justifica'Lion for Rezone Pierre 1 rady Way Site @ Oakesdale j Thy proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses are not available in the northwest quadran of the city that includes the Pierre Grady Way site. Implementation of these uses will inc;ease the ran:e and variety of uses, and introduce services to motorists along the SW Grady Way.and Oakesd. e Avenue SW arterial corridors. Policy 1 U,212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one ano her. Th: proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency will be.compatible in character (scale, . •pearance) and supportive in terms of services offered to existing land uses in the area. The gas sta.•n will be a complementary use to the onsite rental car agency. Both uses are likely to serve the adja ent Extended Stay of America hotel, and the office and light industrial parks to the north and northeast. Policy U-212.8 Recognize,viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office u e. Go•d access and high visibility are important attributes of the site for the proposed uses. I The intensi of locating in lsuich close proximity to heavily traveled arterials could be less desirable for comme cial office uses. Recent Land Use Code amendments support gas stations, mini marts and car rental/s. es agencies asprimary permitted uses in the City's industrial zones. Policy LU-212.9 Confimlercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasona'le buffering b tween the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deliveri,s and loading to industrial areas can be maintained Th. proposed site plan complies with all required setbacks, and includes providing peri'meter landsca•e buffers. Natural plantings for wildlife habitat are proposed in the northwest corner of the site, adj.cent to an area Iof natural vegetation retained on the Extended Stay of America hotel property. These ff atures will maintain a significant visual buffer between the gas station/mini mart and the hotel. Fuel t. I er truck access to the site is proposed from the westernmost driveway on SW Grady Way. Policy U-212.11 Changes in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to another should ,e considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's ecor omit base s ' employment b1 ase. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse landd use impacts may be taken into account. Sel-cting tenants and developing a site plan in accordance with all applicable City of R nton develop ent standards was a significant challenge for the Pierre Grady Way site, due to the narrow 4 8%14/98 Justific don for Rezone Pierre rady Way Site @ Oakesdale and ire lar configuration of the property, required setbacks, existing utility easements and overhead powerliies. The site has remained vacant since annexation to the City of Renton in April.1959. There is no e dence of historical development on the property other than a railroad embankment and drainag- channel — mod�ed at the time of the 1997 grade and fill action, and electrical power transmi.sion/distributiori 'lutes. The proposal constitutes an efficient use of the property, and will(create jobs an"" tax revenues for the City of Renton. The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency ' increase the balance of uses in the vicinity, as described above following Policy LU-212.1. Policy U-212.12 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/or compat'ble uses are already located in the area. Ot ler auto-related uses exist to the east along the SW Grady. Way corridor, and properties adjacen to the site, alo g the north side of SW Grady Way, are.currently.;zoned IM. I. Policy U-212.13 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones where.there is an opportunity to crea e improved efficiencies of use through the joint use/sharing of onsite facilities such as parking, open ••ce and supporting services. Se- the discussion hat follows Policy LU-212.2, above. Policy U-212.16 Favorable consideration may be given to rezones to industrial uses when a Unix or wider r• ge of uses is not yet appropriate for a site. Se the discussion that follows Policy LU-212.8 and LU-212.11 above. Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encotOged Incenti es should be offered to encourage shared parking. The proposed site plan includes vehicular connections between the onsite parking areas of the ga• station/mini nia�t and car rental/sales agency, and the offsite parking area of the Eagle Hardw:re corporate office. A northeast access drive is proposed between the site and r.owell Avenue.SW, through the Eagle Hardware corporate office parking lot, in an existing 20- wide access asement executed December 20, 1985. Signifi ant Material Change. • Grade and Fill Action. James and Barbara Lynn Pierre purchased the Grady ,ay @ Oakes ale Avenue SW property from Puget Sound Energy Services in 1996. In 1997, they appled for and re eived- a City q Renton Special Fill and Grade Permit (File LUA-97-046, SP) and Grading Licens (No. 970552)to place approximately 15,000 cy of fill on the property to bring it up t i,grade p with adjacent streets. The permit application and SEPA Checklist that accompanied the app'cation J 5 8/14/98 r ii Justific Lion for Rezone Pierre rady Way Site @ Oakesdale disclose the likely development proposal for the site, as described in paragraph one of the Recent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes section of this Justification for Rezone. - .Based on commu 'cations with and permissions received from the,City to-date, which have all been supportive of the p oject,the owners incurred the expense to proceed with the fill and grade action. j torm Drainag Modifications. The 1997 fill and grade action included leveling the former railroad embankment through the northern parcel, and installing a subsurface drainage collection system twin 48-inch culverts) where an open drainage channel had previously bisected the site. This . action as closely coordinated with the City of Renton, which owns the drainage easement;'and;with the W hington Department of Fish & Wildlife. Approximately 100 feet at the west end of the drainage channel was left open, with.a vegetated bottom and side slopes, for water quality enhanc ment prior to stormwater discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. I Transportation System Improvements. Oakesdale Avenue SW ; currently. terminates appro ' ately one block south of SW Grady Way. During .1998,. the City of:Renton began constru ing a southward extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW to SW 27th Street. It is expected that this co struction will be complete by November 1998. The second phase of this roadway project is schedul-d to complete Oakesdale Avenue SW as a.through-route to SW 29th.Street in 1999. Oakesd. e Avenue SW is expected to receive considerable use as an alternate route to the I-405/SR- 167 int:rchange. The services proposed for the Pierre Grady Way site—gas station, mini mart, and car. rental/s. es agency — are not currently available in the northwest quadrant of the City, and will be conve ently accessible to motorists in the SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW arterial corrido s. Public 1: ealth, Safety&Welfare 1 Neither the rezone action nor development and operation of the proposed uses are expect d.to adversely impact conditions of public health, safety or welfare in the site vicinity. While he operation of a gas station will have more associated risk of fire or explosion than the vacant site, there are numerous Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable regulations with which he owner/operator will comply to minimize these risks. There are no sensitive contiguous land u es (such as a public school, day care center, medical facility, residence, etc.). At the time of this application, the owner was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound Energy Servic s to place some powerlines underground and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated . will result in burying the east-west powerlines from the east end of the open drainage channel to Powell Avenu SW, and relocating the north-south powerlines offsite to the west. These actins, if - imple ented by Puget Sound Energy at the owners' expense,will improve onsite conditions of safety. I' 6 8/14/98 i MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ! ' z o , \ DEC 0 2199� B.CRAIG 1 ON K. K,JOHN JONES ONES o C1T`(OF RETIE '0 kwMICHAEL L.BARTHOL c r ADAM B.CLARK THOMAJOELO. P.HUDSON �,_' JOEL O.NIEMI N'�� THE RECEIVED A,GARYO'LEARY ICY<E V AIN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE GARRY V.QUINTON THOMAS M.TREDWAY o ARCHITECTS PAUL D.TURMALA Q TIM TWIETMEYER I Me I bers of the City Council December 1, 1998 City of Renton - 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 I Dykernan# 97-080.0 Re: Pierre Grady;WaySite @ Oakesdale, File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Clarification of Conditions of Site Plan Approval ,. 1 Dear City Council Members: We are writing on behalf of James and Barbara Pierre, property owners and applicants for Rez ne and Site Plan!Approval at SW Grady Way/Oakesdale Avenue SW, to help clarify and pro ide the Council with additional information concerning the Hearing Examiner's conditions of Site Plan Approval. The conditions are as follows: 1. he applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The City shall)have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary including both the driveway along Grady and the easement driveway/access in the northeast corner of the subject site. I ' We understand th dt Site Plan Approval is contingent on rezone to IM, which the Hearing Ex miner recommends against. Disagreement with the rezone recommendation is expressed in separate correspondence to the City Council (Vicki Morris Consulting Services, November 30, 1998). 1 1 Conditions Imposed by the ERC Th Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued by the City of' Renton Environmental Review Committee identified two Mitigation Measures: a Fire Mitigation Fee (wilth which the applicant takes no exception), and a Traffic Mitigation Fee. It was unclear to us that these conditions were imposed at the time of Environmental Review; we thought they were recommendations to the Hearing Examiner to be discussed further during the hearing and imposed at his!discretion during Site Plan Approval. A Traffic Study prepared by a consultant to Mr. Pierre (Michael R. Birdsall and Associates, May 29, 1998; copy attached) us d .national rese+rch currently being documented by the Institute for Transportation I 1716 W.MARINE IEW DRIVE SECOND FLOOR • EVERETT,WA 98201-2098 • PHONE 425-259-3161 FAX 425-349-7554 E-MAIL office@dykeman.net i ! ' Y Me bers of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File o. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Eng neers (ITE), to show that gas stations, convenience stores and other service-oriented bus nesses attract ai large number of"pass-by" trips, rather than destination trips, and therefore trip generation for ipurposes of calculating impact fees should be reduced and recalculated as "tri -equivalents." There was no discussion with Mr. Pierre or the traffic consultant prior to issu'ng the mitigated DNS with full trip generation estimates for the proposed uses.! The traf is consultant hats subsequently been in communication with Neil Watts (Plan Review Supervisor, Development Services), and was advised that the traffic impact.fee is an ad inistrative action, not imposed until issuance of a Building Permit. In a letter dated Oct ber 30, 1998 (copy attached), Michael Birdsall provided Mr. Watts with !more • inf rmation concerning the justification for trip length adjustments, which Mr. Watts said he wo Id consider. Mr. Pierre wishes to keep this issue open while staff consider more current me odology for calculating trip generation associated with the proposed uses. Absolute Discretion to Modify Access Dri eway locations on SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW have been selectedl!based on the access and circulation requirements of fuel delivery trucks. Points of access and onsite circulation are further constrained by vertical separation required from overhead powerIlines. The eastern-most driveway is proposed for separate access to the rental car/used car sales area. There is very little ioom for "discretion" associated with driveway locations that will still sup ort the proposed uses on the site. We have coordinated proposed driveway locations and wi the with staff, and would be happy to discuss possible minor additional adjustments. Ho ever, we object to "absolute discretion" in this matter. ,, i i' Ac,ess to/from Powi ll Avenue SW via the northeast access road through the Eagle Hardware co orate office prking lot is proposed in an existing 20-ft easement. This easement was on inally created sek'eral years ago to serve what was then a land-locked parcel (the area that jut northward in the site). The Eagle Hardware parking lot was designed around this easement, and accommodates through traffic. It would be a secondary access to the property (n t heavily used)J and beneficial to emergency vehicle access. I ill participate in upcoming Council Hearings and/or Council committee meetings, and wo Id be happy to discuss these issues with you further. cerely, - s I,. AimA . . Michael L. Barthol, AIA - - ' D keman Architects, representing James and Barbara Pierre 2. . Members of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site 0 Gakesdale Fil No. LUA-98-126,I,SA-H, R I En,losures: 1. Site Plan 2. Traffic Study (Michael R. Birdsall, May 29, 1998) 3. Correspondence with Neil Watts (Michael R.Birdsall, October 30, 1998) cc: James and Barbara Pierre, Owner/Applicant Don Moody,Western Pacific Properties,Inc. • Michael R.Birrdsall,Transportation Planner i Vicki Morris,Vicki Morris Consulting Services Jana Huerter, City of Renton Land Use Supervisor Peter Rosen, City of Renton Senior Planner I1 i I I I i I - • . 3 1 \\ NE 1/4 SEC. 24 ,I WP.23 N ,ROE. 4 E ,W.M. i 1€ k \ _ 1 R - �v € \ j' /j - riolFi e pei \ • eMT<ss.o.erao WATER.Avi - S� eg1 i \ a .,.,. TOPnrn i yTR \ SYMBOLS OR 1\\ gvv 10 I I ON WATER 5:'.FGRATOR /VALVE II.22 _sr 9COty OFF V• VE ❑ LATOn MEN / 1 �-�� �-�� p e WATER R -�- \ e WATER M.NN= i - FS-FIREterDRAYTVI - - - /-f� ® SATE vaL a .° o«. - 6: y L I- \ ELECTRIC BOIL' -- - 0. &.OW OFF VALVE otIu '�reK / \ ORION...GRADE ELEVATIONS _ -- yr r,�'"ee.a' ryO e»+r 1 1 \ t� 76. I door a seeoln>rer ow_x:.� 5 R \ we (SPOT ELEVATIONr) av+o - . TO DRItE ` ` LGhT POLE •/ 0. ` 3 ACaD5f TM a \ 9 WaT^.3 at_RER t \ -i_ � p.� �5e:sux TAJ \ / - "C ORa.YaGE.Dd:LTICY OP 5LO'n_ r\ _ h TAW'ST� `' •• - 1 �:• �� .r. • r ...¢%wr, ..bid..:�Lv / `, 1 I//-- 6' �'-O'... 5• '• - IP .. ~-ex5TNG OtE4n'.wD xt�R FCnEx . \ '-' '-''.�. gal G:.:,Mi� • I'.' .:.D ieai-. IAE TO RGw1.Y nL i (� a d, n• • 0. e ----- ---------- ---\�`-- - --� �--� I -• ..�. -_E� ''1 � W ,g --• -e ...:^'n�..+o� �M'p t� -5Lt_el.R''c w ------- - - - s -- -- - -- OTIA . -- - - -- _ -'l - Th.► 4 f 6,�p.5P ,f:I .04 la ++� 91r- --Woof - - .�1' g /; .a�'� �er.�'°"�.:r M., s •e4i'_ .. is A A .,---- I 1�/15 -'� - '�/�/ s :` :: � .. ors .'•���`�•-! ai--- "" 111160. �"' \ V`4► \e. /• _//'--- .''� �.- ack- • J-7.,slain Q�'-''' i,.-,._" ii fd„� - -\ 5 1 ..,..�awe.. ,-..• R C� .� � "-y .} to ls.. ... �/ Q% \ ,,,.--- • • ° `@\' _---- seaJ-�,.����I t tejipa��tt `,tat V: . r' 1e�i '1 - �\.._._____.--------" --"'" S \i •`J �!-�_ go-- c��roaio� i V\.:, \'.. .),, ..t `..td ,65' yid,:gt waY t / I���ai •� , ; "�.;. Ya xe^""p0' 4-4 :4i, i.. \05::. "" P sue. - Iv j�wMRMAST5eeTlow Ill III :rn '� y \ .- '• •�/,a44 ,gis_,-�6TD▪• A,r� !` j �x„�(� �Ps. . SITE PLAN NOTES ���L. i ' -\ �" 5 ': nl,� i�1` l�Y"'� 1. 'Wares building Outl Inc ID \ i..�� 4 rg. 1► /w tCi 2. Light Pole �-• TO . _BIdFx - �'v "01 Pyc%ice ►..p 000010. - 3. Tank tarn. Q &df '' ir �q a p.-5 y. Trash En:lasure O \ V ,, e �. `a_s�„ _ 5. Canopy and gas Dune location ce \ ��t i ,y `: nn1? goo 6. Ligh radius 2'at curb unless otherwise indicated. �. •SETBACK S , a'j3� 7. Enterprise street swage \ \ r. to 8. N%v COntd`rG E 50�'A �/al �j rs 70. Cnevronist gat�eetpsipnage a4 / SITE PLAN INFORMATION "RYG 'A? Ex I Pala footage of ine site, 2.T4 Acres•f18354 sq.lt. T ParYnp PrpppseC: • '.4, FRO.W TO't013' _ � Lendanepsqua p Convenience Stara/Gas Station Dark inp• 9-9'-0'stanCara s[al Is Sg ` �` TO Cp.Dai 2. C spuale Iapupe: 0 sp.11. 1-Irking handicap opal: peheens �` pu Tptal Convenlenca$Tare/Gas Station Dalk inp: 10 parking12.-0'stalls proposes stall Y? Tv 5��/' I 3. soap ina square IDptaae+ ND. Date Descro cn �' ............ �ed�J' �/ Tea InLan scap,np for appal Ile: 6E90 sq.l[.I5.52 al [el I Enterer ise Ur Rental/Sales:Iv/a expansion] ie'-9•-0'del Para dial Is / ual'al ep Landscape area: 2277Ot77 sp.I t. 19.3:pt is,to 10-Ir�-co.altemi milsarked square footage of Lanpscxping: c"km-3 sq.It.124.ad al s 64-e•-6-cparall stalls va 4 01 I 1G -12-01 handicap ilalle .v/-Ip_n9 STA,^ eolase: Total Prppvse°parking:Ir.c ex and loCl ?fie parxin Is C `- Gn Enterprise 5[Crel ails Ctat San au qui inp: 1325 sq.lt. n ' p p step propose Ente a G:Rental/Cal Sates Cui la,np: u 50 sv.lt. se DraPaseo parkirp:I.expanslonl a-9'-0.slam.atal la _ GVSTy4E P�p!x•L1? Total Suie Future Ets(corn: °0s.I1. - rl Darted seal/] Total cullainC savors Icaeage: 11C+_5 p.l;.19.3:al site) 10-9'-0-apt m .// / sa,.are I Olape: 10-23'-0•parallel stalls 5. Pa,enenl 0 415it. p -12-0-handicap stalls Nxis Inp IrDery loos Surfaces, al Proposed corking.re eraarstanl '146 parx,r New Pavement, 744:5 aq.tt. io: g slat is Orappsea y New s,aerdu ne,sso 1. 11 E. Alm.aD:e pw/din x:R �D • 3 Me.vu,ICing, s1..a5 so.lt g ne,pn:: F01s!x 2'-I.OGA,' ideal Irpery taus Surfaces, ES151 sp.l t.Ii5.2_of site) 9, r posed/.ld:ng net Dht, Ro}ct Ortectn .e'a 31 q 10. &I ldtn9 dataaees repaired by dace: MIP �� 6 a.inp vecuire*ents: 11. Preened nth:1 np smacks. 20'-0' O \\ Conven pence alarel As Station, 5 stal psi l^uV s0�It.pl eu,Idlnq O. Current acanin, CV- nIln INJ STRi as 511305 sd.11./,LW)-6.53 ITT 13. PraDasea caning, Iu-tEDiW UU4'.IPiti g-. I'� Enterprise Car Rental/Gal Ales: 1 sll/SEW Se.it.91 :1e 14. Cens[ruct 4n type: WI .aa(}plan Ddnn°. 51 l E PLAN I I I 119i54 dq.l1./50Ltl•23.97 12:) .1'A • r-40'(F FIRM B 22X34) I cCte•or se Op ice revues parF mp: •,5 seal is/ICCO sa.ry few tang Preaeet ra. IYa...mv•c a.5 star s/1000,Qtll•03.63 roil ��� ;iwp,use Future E pansipn Parxlnp: a.c st tls/1t)N sa-.l. . ,^7 9705O TmEI :44P0 so t.:/0001•20 s(V) A1.1 E \� a pa,x lcq�icu�ie..Lrc aars:Dnl zj4�a�e canon: ilal.s • aeo��r•.a ale xl pdrk inp : ./! nsipnl Tv 2 e-24-9e __,,___I• '" I , ,, , , MICHAEL . BIRDSALL AN SSOCIATES Transportation Planners i May 29, 1998 s. Vicki Mo is icki Morris Consulting Services 7732 18th Ave ue NE 1 eattle, WA 9 115-4426 re: Jamie Pierre Devlelopment Proposal Grady Way & Oakesdale Avenue, Renton, WA ear Ms. Morris: The proposed combination of a convenience store/gas station and car rental/used car sales operation, with a future expansion area, ils subject to the City of Renton's traffic impact fee, based on daily tripe generation. rile attached table gives my current assumptions and calculations in support of the ' following resu ts: 1. Phase 1 - Car rental and used car sales portion: 110 trip-equivalents $ 8,250 Phase 1 - gas station/convenience market : 62 trip-equivalents $ 4,650 Phase 1 - Optional second story above Cony. Mkt: 7 trip-equivalents $ 525 Phase 2 -Future expansion area(restaurant @ 5,000 sq. ft.): 134 trip-equivalents $10,050 Total, all o,tions and phasles: 440 trip-equivalents $23,475 he term"trip-equivalents"refers to the net result after necessary reductions from total trip generation ased on ITE Trip Generation which would be 1,812 trips for the total site. First, reductions are (customary for `pass-by"trips lat,}land uses that provide customer services. In addition, national research has confirmed that such land uses have very short trip lengths compared to other land uses. Residential developments d office and industrial employment sites are all associated with average trip lengths of II several miles, while gas stations, convenience stores,and other service oriented businesses draw most of their custo ers from existing traffic just"passing by"the site, or attract them from a very short r.dius (about a mile) round the site. The adjustment for equivalent trip length is necessary for balance(i.e., nexus logic) b tween fees charged from such developments and other land uses. Il I (Note further that Phase 2 trips would be somewhat fewer if the car rental/used car sales business were 'to expand in le."future" space, rather than a restaurant,which was analyzed here for purposes of a `worst case" s 1 enario. will be glad to review the assumptions with the City or the Client, and confirm or modify this anal' sis s needed thereafter. Sincerely, lidiae-/e81;e4,' ichael R. Birdsall, I.T.E. 1 Attachment (4 5) please note new azea code: 2 25'713 SE 164th Street • Issaquah, WA 98027 • (206)392-7062 • Fax(206)392-8764. • TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady Way & Oakesdale Avenue, Renton WA • SITE ACTIVITY TRIP-GENERATION NET-IMPACT-FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction Net Impact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount 1.a Car Rental Business @ (1/3) of 5,000 sq. ft. & 142 parking spaces a. Reserve 10 parking spaces for employees and customers Rental fleet= (1/3) x(142-10) spaces= 44 spaces ---— ------b.--Car-rental cycle = 1/3-@-2-3-days-and-2/3-@ 7-14-days — --- -- Average rentals/week/car= 173 @ 2+ 2/3-@--.5 = 1.0 rentals/wk/car: 1.0 c. Each rental transaction generates 3 round trips=6 trip ends trips/rental: 6 d. Daily trips = car-spaces x (rentals/wk) x (trips/rental) / (5 44 rental cars 1.2 52 days/wk) _ e. On-site employees= 10 1 0 employees 2 20 f. Vehicle maintenance every 7,000 mi. @ 250 mi./rental 44 vehicles 0.07 4 = 28 rentals/mntc = .035 mntc/wk = .007 mntc/day x 2ways g. Miscellaneous deliveries, other visitors 1 site 2 0 2 0 - Gross Total Trip Generation g 6 h. Reduction for very short trip lengths @ 1/2 of site VMT 96 trips -50% -48 Item subtotal, Car Rental 9 6 -48 4 8 $75 $ 3,600 1.b Used Car Sales Business @ (2/3) of 5,000 sq.ft. & 142 parking spaces - Compare to ITE Class 841, "New Car Sales"-closest available reference-but remove half for the probably lower activity level at used car sales by rental companies a. Base for trip generation =2/3 of 5,000 sq. ft. building = 3.333 1000 s.f. c. ITE Class 841 daily trip rate per 1,000 sq.ft. = 37.5 • d. Estimated daily trips= 3.33 1000 s.f. 37.5 126 e. Adjustment for probable differences in activity levels, used car 126 trips -50% -64 sales vs.new car sales Item subtotal, Used Car Sales 126 -64 62 $75 $ 4,650 SUBTOTAL, Car rental and sales portion of Phase 1 222 -112 11 0 $75 $ 8,250 BIRDSApl &ASSOCIATES Transportation Planners 29-May-98 Fa+(45)391.d761 ay- page 1 of 2 ` 25713 SF 7A4h Serra•lu nquoh,WA 9M17•(45)191-70E7 . TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE . Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady-Nay-&-Oakesdale AvenueTRentomWA SITE ACTIVITY TRIP GENERATION NET IMPACT FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction Net Impact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount 2. Gas Station/Co_nvenience Market @ 1,472 sf — a. ITE Land Use Class 853 (gross trip rate) 1.472 1000 sf 845.6 1244 b. Reduction for pass-by trips 1244 trips -70% -871 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental&sales business 1244 trips -10% -125 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 248 net trips -75% -186 Item Total,Convenience Market& Gas Station 1244 -1182 62 $75 $ 4,650 • 2.b (Optional)Second Story Office&storage uses above Convenience Market a. ITE Land Use Class 710,General Office Building (gross trip rate) 0.736 . 1000 sf 11.01 8 applies to half the unit; dead storage in other half b. Reduction for pass-by trips 8 trips 0% •0 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental place 8 trips -10% -1 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 7 net trips 0% 0 Item total, Second Story Office above Convenience Market - 8 -1 7 $75 $ 525 SUBTOTAL, Convenience Market/Gas Station portion of Phase 1 1252 -1183 69 $75 $ 5,175 TOTAL, Phase 1 1474 -1295 179 $75 $ 13,425 • • 3. Future Addition of 5,000 sq. ft. rental space consistent with zoning • Example: ITE Land Use Class 831 (Quality Restaurant) 5.000 1000 sf 89.95 450 Reduction for pass-by trips 450 trips -40% -180 Reduction for short trip lengths of net new trips 270 net trips -50% -136 134 TOTAL, Phase 2 450 -316 134 $75 $ 10,050 GRAND--TOTALS-FOR=E-FTIRE SITE - - - 192 --- -1-61-1 - --313 -- $75 $ 23,475 BIROSALLo&ASSOCIATES Transpo,mlion Plannrrs 29-May-98 page 2 of 2 Fat(J2S)J91d781 3 1S711 SE 164th Sired•Inagua&WA 98027•(QS)102-7o81 111-30-1998 9:57AM FROM' V. MORRIS CONSULTING 206 523 4648 P. 8 • MICR L R.BIRDSALL�.-. )ASSOCIATES . , _ t Transpartatim Planners ! '. I ) • October 30, 1998 • Mr.Neil Watts . ! Plannin uiiding/Public Works Department - • 1055 Sou Grady Way City'of R nton Renton, WI 98055 ' 1 re: Pierre Grady Way Site Development Project No.LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Dear Mr. Watts: I . . Thank yoi for the_time you.have taken to explain the City's methodology for evaluating traffic impacts • of development. I.have reviewed.your memo to Peter Rosen dated September 4, 1998,outlining your • • t• raffic mit gction fee calculation. As I understand it,the calculations in that memo are not finalized by, the hearin: examiner after!tomorrow's public hearing,and will be subject to change by administrative • '.action,up to the date of issuance of a building permit. Therefore,by this letter I am presenting to you •important ew information which.supports a major reduction in the traffic impact fee for the subject develvpm•nt. I trust that this information will be incorporated in your updated calculations for the • developm•nt by the time of application for building permits. ! 1 • There are wo areas of concern: • . - • • I (, • (a) Revisions to the official description of the proposed development,and , . . • (b) Justification of impact reductions on account of short trip lengths. . I fa) Revised Site Deseriatior Most importantly,the impact fee associated with the potential restaurant in phase 2 should be replaced, by a calcu ation based on an expansion of the phase I car rental business-not a restaurant. My May 2 , 1998,anal sis had included a possible restaurant use solely in response to a request from the City's land •use planner for a"worst ca e"review of potential uses under the proposed rezone,but that use was . never contemplated by the applicant. Understandably,your own fee calculation simply re-used the Iand use assum tions in my report! But since the actual site plan being reviewed contains no restaurant and' never will,the inclusion of la restaurant in traffic impact fee calculations should be seen as a non-binding - "what-if' calculation that does not apply in fact to the actual development proposal at hand. • In addition,the applicant has removed the 2nd story office from the site plan,and adjusted the square I • footages of the car rental and sales building between phase 1 and phase 2 (5,250 sq.ft for phase 1,and ' .4,480 sq.ft.for phase 2,totalling 9,730 sq.ft. instead of 10,000 sq. ft.). . 14j justific Lion of Trip Ler gth Adjustment§ • ApparentlY the City has not heretofore considered variations in trip lengths as a factor affecting the ' traffic mitigation fee calculafton. In my view,this is a dangerous simplification that could place the Ciy Cage note New 4eea colt: (425) 25713 SE 164th Street • l r uah.WA 98027 • a4 (206)392-7062 • Fax(206)392•87ti4 ' . 1 11-30-1998 9:58AM FROM,"--"-.MORR I S CONSULTING 206 523 46_^a. P. 9 i I • I - at risk o serious challenge, on the ground of unfair"taking"that is not adequately correlated to the impacts f development. I was glad to hear from you that the City would be willing to consider a change i its methodology if that were to be demonstrably more fair and equitable than its current flat ' fee per ip. To that end,I have obtained research data from Mr.Steven Tindale,President of Tindale. Oliver,Inc.,who is Chair of a committee of the Institute of Transportation Engineers overseeing publics on of research in this area. Mr.Tindale's committee will soon publish a"Traffic Charact ristics Toolbox"through I.T.E. which will include the research findings to date.on trip len hs with spe ial application to impact fees. Mr.Tindale very kindly provided me with an advance copy of • the s ary table from that•research. I sorted that table on the average values of trip length by land use to create the attached table. Notice that the classes of land uses representing convenienEe rnarkess and gas stations have the shortest trip lengths of all land uses.at about one-third the trip length of most residential and o iice/indus rid employment land uses, Accounting for this difference would bringthe . amount of actual impact into the range which I estimated in last May's report. Mr.Tindale's research was lundertaken in Florida explicitly to address issues of fairness.and equity in , • traffic i pact fees,so as io eliminate the concern about"takings". Trip length is frequently used as ail key fact r in impact fees inithat state,where the measure of impact is"vehicle-miles"rather than"trips". For co ation of this data,you can reach Mr.Tindale in Tampa,Florida,:at(813)226-2106. The Tindale data is very credible information for the City of Renton to rely on to refine its traffic mitigation fee schedule. 1 • For a seplarate perspective on trip lengths,you might contact the city staff who operate the citywide traffic forecasting model.' They will confirm that the traffic forecasting modal(which predicts the trip patterns I hich impact fees are meant to mitigate)also relies on trip length assumptions that would be broadly consistent with tt le Tindale data,although operating on a more simplified set of general land use categoneF. I have personally designed traffic impact mitigation schedules for other cities using a • combination of both types of data: traffic model distributions of trips by general category of land use, plus scale g by I.T.E. data and pass-by assumptions for specific sub-types within the general land use categorie . I would be happy to share that methodology with you,if you are interested. In summary,please consider a general revisionto the City's methodology to account for trip lengths, then prep ii- e a revised fee calculation that includes that revision,as well account for the changes described above in the prcject description. • Feel free o call me to discuss further any aspect of this issue,at your convenience. •. • Sincerely j ' /J , 42,,e19,e.:44/ . Michael Birdsall,I.T.E., , • Attachments cc: Vicki M rris I . • 1 r - . m 1 N Factors Affecting Traffic Impacts of Land Use I.T.E. General Average Average Average 00 Co W LU Code I.T.E. Land Use Units Land Use Category , Trip Lentlth Trip Generation % New Trips co 130-lndustriaal Park -1000 of industrial: 9.00 7.18 91% • •- 220 Apartment DU Residential 7.00 . 6.57 100% D. 01 • 310 Hotel Rooms Residential 8.84 8.47 65% y Na General Recreation Acres Recreational: - 6.55 2.11 100% • N 3> • nla ' District Park Acres . Recreational: 6.55 3.10 _ 540 Junior/Community College Student Miscellaneous: 8.60 1.45 95% m oi 890 Furniture Store 6.43 4.81 54% w 1000 st Retail: 1D 210 Single Family DU - Residential 8.18 . 8.99 100%• N3 Xi -- 330 Resort atel Rooms -Residential 6.-10 18.60- -83%-_-- - m---0 - -1000 sf -- Office and Financial:- -5.63-- - 16.79 - - 63% - al ---- 810� Hospital - _ ---- - 100% - ------- ,� G 222 High Rise Apartment DU Residential 5.62 • 4.20 710 Office over 100,000 GSF 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.48 11.25 92% 3 710 General Office -t000 sf Office and Financial: 5.44 11.01 93% O 714 Corporate Office 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.44 7.72 93% X % 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse DU Residential 5,43 7.8d0 100100% 70 70 Park aura . Residential ' 5.40 710 Office between 10,000.100,000 GSF 1000 sf. Office and Financial: 5.39 13.35 92%6 110 Light Industry 1000 sf Industrial: 5.38 6.99 94% Z 140 Manufacturing 1000 sf Industrial: 5.38 3.68 94% 320. Motel Roams Residential 5.35 7.92 73% od r 150 Warehouse 1000 sf Industrial: 5.35 4.91 94% .I 310,320 Hotel!Motel Rooms Residential 5.28 6.93 72% c.nm z 710 Office under 10,000 GSF 1000 of Office and Financial: 5.27 22.64 232 High-Rise Residential Condominium DU Residential 5.25 4.19 100% D. 420 Marina Berths Recreational: 5.25 2.96 97% r- N Middle School Student Miscellaneous: 5.20 • 1.10 100% g rn 550 U 1Iversity Student Miscellaneous: 5.20 2.40 100% 92% D. Ui Concrete Plant I acre Industrial: 5.10 15.60 92% o Ul Send Mining acre Industrial: 5.10 2.00 Contractor Trades 1000sf Industrial: 5.10 20.00 81% a B. 732 Post Office 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 5.10 108.19 85% ua A 590 Library 1000 sr Miscellaneous: 5.10 54.00Oo 571 Jail bed Miscellaneous: 5.10 1.21 85% . 730 Government Office 1000 se Miscellaneous: 5.10 68.90 92% 841 New end Used Car Sales 1000 sf Retail: 5.03 40.97 79% 720 Medical Office 1000 st Office and Financial: 5.01 35.17 84% 530 High School Student Miscellaneous: 5.00 1.40 95% 430 Golf Course • Park Space Recreational: 4.83 7.73 93% 492 Racquet Club 1000 sf Recreational: 4.83 • 17.11 90%94% 412 County Park Park space Recreational: 4.80 2.55 491 ,Tennis Court court Recreational: 4.60 , 31.04 90% D ea w - Trip length Studies•Tindal°,Chartsr page 1af2 - ---- -- Vasa -_- --- -- - - - - - --- - --- -t1121fl8L3:42PM .• 0 . (i x ' 6 . Factors Affecting Traffic Impacts of Land Use cc I.T.E. General Average Average Average a LU Code I.T.E. Land Use Units Land Use Calgary Trip Length Trip Generation % New Trips - 151 Mini-warehousing 1000sf Industrial: . 4,73 2.50 94% 6 560 Church 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 4.63 9,21 92%6 240 Mobile Home Park DU Residential 4.48 4.81 100% D 820.6. Retail:1,250,000&Abovve 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 4.45 27.26 84% 3 620 Retail:Greater than 1,000.000 1,000 sfgla Retail: 4.40 • 26.71 85% 620.5 Retail 500,000-1,249,999 1,000 sfgla Retell-detailed 3.97 29.86 . 81% • 820 Retail:Between 100,000.1,000,000 1,000 sfgla Retail: • 3.85 - 29.84 82% T 620 Elementary School -Student- Miscellaneous: - 3.80 -. 1.06 _90% . • X __-- --'840___Auto Repair__.. 1000 at --__ ---Rettail: _ -_- • 3.73 ' - --_ 34.03 _--- 72% _ 3- 831. Quality Restaurant 1000 sf Retail: 3.55 93.23 77% 252 Congregate Care Facility DU ' _ Residential • .3.50 ' 2.35 74% • r. '< .820.4 Retail: 403,030 -499,999 . 1,000 Ogle Retail-detailed 3.40 35.72 76% C 837 Quick Lubrication Bays Retail; 3.38 42.54 71% z 849 Tire Store Bays Retail: 3.38 30.55 71% -- Z 832 High-Turnover Restaurant 1000 sf• Retail: 3.11 167.87 73% U. 620 Nursing Home Beds Residential 3.10 2.61 68% • Fire Station wit:,beds 1000 of Miscellaneous: 3.10 5.40 89% C • 647 Car Wash 1000 sf Retail; 3.00 129.60 59% 2 n!a Local Park • Acres Recreational: 3.00 3.10 100% C 820.3 Retail: 300,000-399,999 - 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 3.00- 41.85 72% r 444 Movie Theater Screens Miscellaneous: 2.62 124.40 83% - 911 Bank w1 no Drive-thru 1000 sf Office and Financial: 2.78 148.54 42% 912 Bank wf Drive-thru 1000 sf Office and Financial: 2.68 265.21 49% G 850 Supermarket 1000 sf Retail: 2,65 113.71 50% WA Convenience with gas and fast food 1000 sf . Retail: 2.65 603.45 33% . 6U 820.2 Retail: 200,000-299,999 1,000 algia Retail-detailed 2.85 44.03 74% 820.1 Retail: 100,000-199,995 1,000 Ogle Retell-detailed 2.55 54.18 67% U Veterinary Clinic 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 2.50 • 32.80 70% G . 820 Retail:Between 10,000-100,000 1,000 sfgla. Retail: 2.38 70.07 . 62% 820 Retell 50,00099,999 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 2.36 70.07 62% cr F 565 Day Care 1000 sf Miscellaneous: • 2.33 75.17 73% , a ' 820 Retail: 10,000-50,000 • 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 2.30 91.70 59% . 844 Gas Station pumps Retail: 2.23 144.85 24% - 820 Retail; 0-10,000 1,000 sfgla , Retail-detailed 2,20 167.60 48% 834 Fast Food Restaurant • 1000 sf Retail:- 2.17 564.11 59% 820 Retail:Less than 10.000 1,000 sigia Retail: 2.05 161.35 48% 853 Comrenienca Store with Gas Pumps 1000 sf Retail: 1.85 740.95 29% 851 Convenience Stare 1000 sf Retail: _ 1.70 727.10 46% source:Tindale-Oliver,inc.,Tampa,FL, 'Comparison of Impact Fees and Variables" . • - --TO-Wroth Studies=TindeliCharts,gage 2 et-2- -- - -- 8ia iiii-h Lr+mw - --- -- 14 V98 3:42 PM November 19, 1998 ;OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT,RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION • APPLICANT: James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R LOCATION: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave SW and Powe 1 Ave SW. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct a gas station,convenience store and a car rental/sales office. The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Indu trial (IM). SUMMARY OF ACTION: . Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 28, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the November 3, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,November 3, 1998, at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Partieslwishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The followin exhibits were entered into the record: . xhibit N . 1.: Yellow file containing the original . Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application, roof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan I. Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan • Exhibit No.5: Elevation drawings-mini-mart Exhibit No.6: Elevation drawing- auto rental/sales office Exhibit No.7: Customer parking map James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval and rezone. The site plan approval is to construct a gas station,convenience store and car rental/sales office. The rezone is to rezone the site from the existing Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(IM). Gas stations and auto rental sales uses are not permitted under the current CO zoning;therefore,the applicant requires approval of the rezone to establish the proposed uses on the site. The gas station/convenience store would consist of a 1,300 square foot building,four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 square foot canopy and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground storage tanks. The gas station is located at the very southwest corner of the site,oriented to thei intersection of SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The car • rental/sales office is located in the north central part of the site. There are several transmission lines that cross the site and therefore restrict the building locations. The building pad for the rental/sales office is approximately 10,000 square feet. The applicant plans on initial construction of a 5,250 square foot office. The expansion area would provide for parking until the future expansion occurs. There are approximately 168 parking spaces indicated, including 90 auto display parking places oriented toward SW Grady Way,and 10 parking spaces for the convenience store. No on-site maintenance of the vehicles is proposed. Vehicle washing,is proposed and that would be enclosed at the rear of the structure and equipped with a drainage collection system. This site is outside the Auto Mall area as well as the expanded Auto Mall designation. There will be four points of access,two from SW Grady Way,one from Oakesdale Avenue and a fourth that exits at the northeast corner of the site through the driveway of the adjacent property. The site is presently undeveloped. The Examiner approved a special fill and grade permit in 1997 and approximately 18,000 cubic yards of fill was placed to create a level site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated and the mitigation measures applied were fire and traffic mitigation fees. There is a natural landscape requirement and it is being provided in the L-shaped area at the northwest corner of the site. That is in addition to storm water landscaping contiguous to the area near the adjacent hotel,and the required perimeter landscaping. The project meets the setback requirements. There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposed development. This site is within the Employment Area Valley designation of the Comprehensive Plan (CP). Commercial office and industrial zoning is consistent with that designation. There was a CP amendment adopted this year which basically says that rezoning to CA should be only on sites that are five acres or more. Because this site is less than that applicant is proposing a commercial use and rezone to industrial designation. The range of uses allowed in the IM zone was listed. In response to questioning by the Examiner,Mr. Rosen stated that the industrial uses contiguous to the site made it consistent with existing land use designations, rather than a Commercial Arterial designation. Part of the rezone criteria is that the site was not considered specifically at the time of the last area land use analysis and zoning. The subject site was designated Employment Area Office with a corresponding Commercial Office zoning in 1993. There is no background that IM was considered for the property with the adoption of the City-wide zoning. In 1996 the City initiated a CP amendment and revised the designation of this site to Employment Area Valley. The purpose of that amendment was to allow a wider range of •. commercial office and industrial uses. Further objectives and policies of the CP were listed which staff felt were appropriate for the rezone, including constraints of the site as well as access and visibility. The proposed James Pierre ' I Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LU -98-126,SA-H,R 1 November 1 , 1998 ' 1 Page 3 1 1 gas station/c nvenience store,car rental/sales are not currently available in the northwest quadrant of the',City, and would pr vide a convenient service to motorists. ' I Staff recom ends approval of both the rezone and the site plan with the following conditions of the site •Ian approval: (1)compliance wi�thithe ERC mitigation measures;(2)that the site plan approval be continge t upon approval oft e rezone from C j to IM. 1 Vicky Morn , 7732 18th Avenue NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, applicant representative herein,respo ided to questions by he Examiner regarding the auto mall designation in this area. After meeting with City o icials, she was infolmed that the subject site was excluded from auto mall designation.because of its existing CO zoning, and.t at all properties in the auto mall designation were zoned either CA,IM or CO. Michael Ba hol, 1716 West Marine View Drive,Everett, Washington 98203,applicant architect herein, clarified po ions of the staff Ireport regarding parking counts and the building areas proposed. he 1 irar , 4032 148th Avenue NE,Redmond,Washington 98052, applicant representative herein, explained th.t a large volume off wash water was not anticipated and a recycling system would not neces!arily be installed: Second,provision has been made for potential spill containment by collecting all surface nnoff from the fue station and wash water areas,placing them through oil-water separation and discharging di ectly to the sanita sewer system.. Applicant is also providing additional water quality with swales planted wound the perimete of the site within I he landscape areas. , Don Moody, 16443 SE 35th,Bellevue, Washington.98008, applicant representative herein, explained t at access throu:h the adjacent Eagle site occurred when Puget Power purchased a piece of property that segmented o f and was negotiated between those two parties to fit the existing parking access area. 1 ichael Bin'sail,25713 SE 64th Street, Issaquah, Washington 98027,traffic consultant for applicant h I rein, stated that tl ey are not in agrlee ent.with some of the City's assumptions regarding traffic. They are pu:suing an administrative decision a Id anticipate a revision downward in the present calculations. � I I n Neil Watts, fan Review Suple I isor,Development Services Division,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady W.G, Renton, Washington 98055, stated that the access through the ajdacent Eagle site would probably not be used as a through-w.y because of its location. He further clarified that secondary containment is required for g soline tanks in all .reas, not just in the aquifer protection zone. I James'P. Pierre,941 Crystal Lake Place, Woodinville, Washington 98072,owner/applicant herein, state that if this project i approved the person who would.be involved with the Chevron station has operated five s ch stations. Th other owner is Enterprise Rent A Car and they are known for their quality and should be a.good neighbor. . The Exami er called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to sp ak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 a.m. 1 I 1 James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.:LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 4 FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS:RECOMMENDATION&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants,James P. and Barbara Lynn Pierre, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of property from CO(Commercial Office)to IM(Medium Industrial)together with a site plan for a mixed use development. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located along the north side of SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW on the west and Powell Avenue SW on the east. 6. The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel somewhat like an inverted T-shaped parcel. It has approximately 720 feet of frontage along Grady Way,which forms its southern boundary. It is approximately 80 feet deep at its east boundary. It widens to approximately 240 feet in the center and then narrows to approximately 160 feet at its west boundary. The subject site is approximately 2.74 acres or 119,354 square feet in area. 7. The subject site is zoned CO(Commercial Office),a classification established in June 1993 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404.. I 8. The site was annexed tolthe City with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April 1959. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The area is developed with a variety of uses including automobile sales,office and commercial uses and some industrial uses. • 11. The site is currently vacant and was filled within the last year after receiving a special permit for fill and grade(File No. LUA97-046,SP). The permit allowed the filling and culverting of a drainage ditch that crossed the.property. The west,end of this system was left open.-A power line transmission corridor runs east to west across the site and a distribution line runs north to south from the mainline. While the applicant is hoping to relocate some of these lines,that has not occurred at this time.` 12. The applicant proposes developing a multiple use site that includes a gasoline station, convenience store and a car sales and rental office together with display and customer parking areas. James Pierre 1 Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 1 , 1998 Page 5 13. The convenience store would be located on the corner of the site immediately northeast of the Oakesdale and Grady Way intersection. The gasoline pumps would be located immediately east of the convenience store. This gasoline/convenience complex would include a 1,300 square foot building and four fueling islands cd�vered by a 2,650 square foot canopy. Two 20,000 gallon underground fuel tanks woul hold the gasoline)product.. The system would be guarded by a secondary containment system. The building would be a one-story convenience store. It would be pentagon shaped with one angle aime out toward the intersection. I 14. The econd aspect of the proposal would be the automobile sales and rental complex located east and nort of the gasoline component. The building is located in the north central portion of the site,in the wide ,northern dogleg.1 This would entail a two-phased proposal for the office building and gar ge. • The garage would be used for washing vehicles but maintenance would not be done onsite. Initially, the a plicant will develop a 5,250 square foot, one-story office/garage on a 10,000 square foot bilding pad. The building pad would accommodate an additional,approximately 5,000 square foot addition, pote tially doubling in size the office component. The building will have a gently peaked roof d do er entry. 15. While the staff report indicated that there would be 174 parking stalls located on the site,the applicant indi ated that there would be 168 stalls. If the second phase building were developed,this number would be reduced to 146 stalls. Ten stalls would be associated with the gas station and conveni nce store. The remaining stalls would serve the automobile businesses. The stalls would be concen'rated alon the Grady Way frontage to increase exposure of the rental and sale automobiles. Other st'lls wound be located around the office building. Staffs analysis attempted to divide parking by use and determined that ifthe expansion occurs, some. parking dedicated to automobile display would have to be ptiovided for customer parking and not permanently occupied by rental.or sales cars. 16. The pplicant proposed four driveways for access to and from the site. Two driveways would b loca ed along Grady Way. There would be one driveway along Oakesdale approximately 120 f let- nort of Grady. Staff has indicated that this driveway may need to be limited in the future to assure safe aneuvering into and out of the complex and•safe functioning of the intersection. A fourth) driv way would actually provide access to the site from the adjacent Eagle corporate office building loca ed north of the site) An easement would permit access across the separately owned parcel o this site. 17. The proposal would generate approximately 256 daily trips for the gasoline station,approximately 76 tripslper day for car rental agency and another approximately 62 trips per day for the used car lot. Miscellaneous trips Tile calculated for proposed expansions. The applicant raised some conce about the trip generation fee but those were imposed as part of ERC review and were not challenged. 18. The proposed IM zone requires 20 foot setbacks along the arterial streets of Grady and Oakesdaile. The - convenience store is set back 20 feet. The office is set back over 100 feet. In addition,the IM zone requires a landscape strip along those same arterials of 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever is less. The applicant will be providing the 20 feet along Oakesdale which will be coupled with the 2% Soil Conservation Service natural landscaping in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant will be providing a variable landscaping strip along Grady that varies with the lot depth as measured from Gra y. The landscaping varies from about 10 feet deep to 13 feet to portions 20 feet deep. There will also be landscaping around the rest of the perimeter of the lot and accent plantings will be located arou d the buildings. • � I, 410 James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.:LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998. Page 6 19. Detention is not required on this site but water treatment will be required to maintain the quality of any water directed into the storm drainage system since it ultimately enters the P-1 Channel system. Water quality swales will be located along the Grady frontage in general. Contaminated water from asphalt surfaces will be directed Ito oil/water separator and discharged to the sanitary sewer system and not the storm system. The volume of car wash water is not considered large and directed to the sanitary sewer and will not be recycled as it is in commercial carwash facilities. The gasoline distribution systems. will use secondary containment. 20. A hotel is located north of the western half of the subject site. An office complex with which it will share an access driveway is located north of the eastern half of the site. Offices are located south of the . site. The Metro plant is located northwest of the site across Oakesdale. 21. The property immediately north of the subject site is zoned CO.as is all of the property along the east side of Oakesdale north to South 7th Street and north of there. The property directly south across Grady is also zoned CO.' The parcel east of the site is zoned IM,the category requested by the applicant. A parcel southeast of the subject site south of Grady is also zoned IM. 22. The following is a short list of some of the range of uses permitted in the IM Zone: a. Construction office and material and equipment storage. b. Lumber; coal and fuel yards. c. Bulk retail and wholesale outlets. d. Automobile and truck(commercial and non-commercial)sales,rentals and repair establishments and body shops. e. Mobile home,trailer and recreational vehicle sales,rental and repair establishments. CONCLUSIONS: Rezone • 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest,that it will not impair the public health; safety and welfare and in addition,complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14,which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject sitel is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. . The requested classification is not justified and should not be approved by the City Council. Since an entire Site Plan was predicated on the approval of a reclassification of the subject site,this office will provide an alternative recommendation in the event the City Council approves the reclassification of the subject site to IM as proposed by the applicant. 2. This case is not easy. It would appear that the applicant is looking for an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier requests to extend the Auto Mall Improvement district to include this site were 1 James Pierre , _ Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUAI-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 ' Page 7 reject d. While there is some support in the Comprehensive Plan policies to recommend reclassification,those policies just as well recommend any commercial classification including the Commercial Office (CO)the site is currently zoned. The Comprehensive Plan's designation of Employment Area Valley does not necessarily favor an industrial designation any more than it favors the current CO zoning., CO allows a wide range of commercial uses which would generate additional jobs NI)ithout introducing possibly deleterious industrial uses. I 3. This office will recommend that the City Council not reclassify the subject site. It appears that the City Council specifically amended the Auto Mall provisions of the Code and those changes included the general boundaries of the areas so designated. This site was omitted from those changes. It may be that the City preferred realizing some of its other goals of the Comprehensive Plan which is to provide • for a diversified economic base including,therefore, businesses not engaged in automotive sales nd services. This is an admitted prime location of the City. The City located a gateway sign in this area and it may prefer an interesting office building to additional automotive services. Is a gasoline station and convenience store Tallied with a car rental and sales operation appropriate for this site? Clearly,that is fairly debatable. , 4. While the applicant's proposal does not include industrial uses,the range of uses that could be permitted on the site if it'is reclassified to IM is wide and not all of them necessarily appropriate for a gateway entrance to the City. If IM zoning is approved,there is nothing that requires the uses proposed by the:applicant. The gasoline and rental car aspect could be abandoned. Within the last year another proponent proposed reclassifying a site just south of I-405 from IM to CO to construct a motel/hotel. Those plans were stopped and now that applicant prefers the original IM. The Seattle Times still has not developed its elaborate proposal for the Valley. Many plans that have been submitted,reviewed and approved are abandoned on a regular basis. So the question before reclassifying this site is tb ask if the range of uses that are permitted in the IM zone would be appropriate for this gateway site, adjacent to a residential hotel. The IM zone would permit: construction offices and material and equipment storagle; lumber,coal and fuel yards; bulk retail and wholesale outlets; and automobile and truck (commercial and non-commercial)sales, rentals as well as repair establishments and body shops! In addition, it looks as if the IM zoning is somewhat disparate from the adjacent properties in general. Most of_Oakesdale's east frontage is zoned for Commercial Office uses befitting the quality and image the C'ty has attemptedlto achieve for this new, well landscaped boulevard type of street. 5. Supporting the proposal are the fact that the Comprehensive Plan would also call for some diversity of zoning types which might favor the proposed zoning. But, again,the proposed ad hoc expansion of the autoniall will not really introduce any additional economic diversity. Much of Grady Way is already dedicated to automotive sales and service and adding an additional use is not improving the economic diversity of the area. The other aspect of the site which could favor rezoning the site are some development constraints on the subject site. Due to the various,powerlines,the large expanse of parking proposed by the applicant would be accommodated in the IM Zone. . 6. Cleary,the City Council will ultimately decide the issue. The recommendation provides them with a slightly different point of view and different references. If they choose to reclassify the subject site to IM,t en the applicantshould be provided with an appropriate review of the proposed site plan. Site Plan 7. The ste plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: I James Pierre -, - Pierre Grady Way Site. File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November'19, 1998 Page 8 a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; • d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 8. The proposed use is a mixed commercial venture which is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of Employment Area Valley for the subject site. In addition, it provides a reasonable landscape transition with the hotel site to the north. 9. Building Code issues will be resolved when a permit is applied for. If the City Council rezones the subject site,the proposed use would be compatible with the IM zoning proposed by the applicant. 10. The low-rise buildings should not have any adverse impacts on adjacent property or the general public. The site is well landscaped from both the public spaces along.the adjacent streets and from the uses north of the site. It appears to have made reasonable use of a site and worked around the powerline corridors. Value judgments could be made about developing this prime gateway site with a gasoline station and convenience store as the focus at the intersection,but the use would be permitted if the site is appropriately rezoned. 11. The site will generate additional traffic but it appears that the surrounding street system has reasonable capacity to handle the additional traffic. The driveway proposed for Oakesdale could create turning or maneuvering problems for left turns if traffic on that roadway increases. The City,therefore, shall have the absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary. Similarly,at the current time staff did not see any problems with creating an easement driveway from the subject site through the parcel to the north for access to Powell Avenue. If any problems arise from this access, staff shall have the discretion to bar the through access using this easement. 12. The development of the site with the uses proposed should not adversely affect neighboring property values. Clearly,there will be additional traffic and probably 24 hour per day traffic frequenting the gasoline station and convenience store. Hopefully,this:noise will not spill over to the hotel complex north of the site. 13. It appears that the driving aisles and driveways provide for safe circulation within the site. Access for pedestrians is provided by connections to the nearby sidewalks. 14. The buildings and pump canopy are widely spaced on the site and should not interfere with light and air to the site or surrounding uses. James Pierre I'_ Pierre Grady Way Site File No:: LUAII-98-126,SA-H,R November 19 I 1998 • - Page 9 15. It app ars that adequate public utilities are available to serve the subject site. 16. In conclusion,the proposed Site Plan makes reasonable use of the oddly shaped site. RECOMMENDATION: I I The City Council should deny the reclassification of the subject site from CO to IM. • DECISION: • If the City Council approves the reclassification of the subject site the Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditionslj: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The City shall have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary including both tlhe driveway along;Grady and the easement driveway/access in the northeast corner of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 19th day of November, 1998. ce FRED J.KA MAN HEARING E MINER • TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of November, 1998 to the parties of record: . Peter Rosen Vicky Morris Mike Barthol 1055 S Grady Way . 7732 18th Avenue NE 1716 W.Marine View Drive Renton, WA 8055 Seattle, WA 98115 Everett,WA 98203 Sheryl Girar Don Moody Michael Birdsall 4032 148th Avenue NE 16443 SE 35th 25713 SE 164th Redmond,WA 98052 I Bellevue,WA 98008 Issaquah,WA 98027 • Neil Watts James Pierre 1055 S Grady Way 941 Crystal Lake Place Renton,WA 98055 I Woodinville, WA 98072 II , James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No:: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 10 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal -Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator South County Journal • Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 3, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine,provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by.the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ,,_ Decem e er 31, 1998 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I � STATE •F WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) MARIL N J. PETERISEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly II sworn n oath, de oses and says that she is a citizen of the United States :and a resid nt of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party t o nor interested in this matter. That on, the 31st dayl of December, 1998, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affix nt duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King ' County Vvrashington,1 by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hear ng Examinees decision filed by Vicki Morris, representative for J. es and Ba I tiara Pierre (File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R). '' 1 Marily J. etersen; City Clerk SUBSC IB,D AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 31st day of December, 1.98. I Brenda Fritsvci d Notary, blic in and 'Ifor t St t of Washington, residing in '. Peter Rosen, Development Services Vicki Morris Mike Barthol City of Renton Vicki Morris Consulting Services 1716 W. Marine View Drive 1732 18th Ave NE Everett, WA 98203 Seattle, WA 98115-4426 Sheryl Girard Don Moody Michael Birdsall 4032 148th Ave. NE 16443 SE 35th 25713 SE 164th Redmond, WA 98062 Bellevue, WA 98008 Issaquah, WA 98027 Neil Watts, Development Services James Pierre Renton Planning Commission (9) City of Renton 941 Crystal Lake Place Woodinville, WA 98072 Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Sandra Meyer, Transporation City of Renton City of Renton Ron Olson, Utilities Sue Carlson, EDNSP Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works City If Renton City of Renton City of Renton Jim anson, Development Services Mike Kattermann, Technical Larry Meckling, Building Officia City of Renton Services Director City of Renton City of Renton ChAIL Nhtt,t(- iNAAAA mlym 40 CITTF RENTON •.� ' City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Pedersen Dec- ber 30, 1998 APPEAL FILED BY: James and Barbara Pierre Representative: Vicki Morris of Vicki Morris Consulting Services RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/19/98 denying the zoning , reclassification of the site, located at SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave SW, from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R. To Parties of Record: Pursiant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hea 'ng examiner's decision denying reclassification-of the above referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-16.B., within five days of receipt of thle notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council secretary at 425 430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of hearing examiner decisions or,recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For dditional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425 430-6502. Sincerely, r Marilyn J. e•t sen, CMC City Clerk Attachment i 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 . (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUT OF ARCHITECTS Z of • B.CRAIG THOMPSON K,JOHN JONBES 8 , CISY OF RENT ON MICHAEL L,BART IOL w ��� THOMAS M B.CLARK P.HUD cj ,� , DEC; O. 2 1998 JOELO. I HUDSON JOEL O.NIEMI .'1L.4P THE RECEIVED A.GARY O'LEARY Y<EVA\ CITY CLERK'S OFFICE GARRY V.QUINT N THOMAS M.THE WAY a ARCHITECTS PAUL D.TURMA TIM TWIETMEYER I ; Members of the City Council December 1, 1998 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dykeman#97-080.0 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale, File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Clarification of Conditions of Site Plan Approval Dear City Council Members: I We .re writing on behalf of James and Barbara Pierre, property Owners and applicant for Rezo e and Site Plan Approval at SW Grady Way/Oakesdale Avenue SW, to help clarify and provide the Council, with additional information concerning the Hearing Examiner's conditions of Site Plan Approval. The conditions are as follows: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The City shall have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as n1ecessary including both the driveway along Grady and the easement driveway/access in the northeast coiner of the subject site. I I We understand that Site Plan Approval is contingent on rezone to IM, which the Hering Examiner recommends against. Disagreement with the rezone recommendation is expressed in se arate correspolndence to the City Council (Vicki Morris Consulting Services, November 30, 1998). Conditions Imposed by the ERC The Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued by the City of' R nton Env' onmental Review Committee identified two Mitigation Measures: a Fire Mitigation Fee (wit which the applicant takes no exception), and a Traffic Mitigation Fee. It was unclear to us t at these conditions were imposed at the time of Environmental Review; we thought they wer .recommendations to the Hearing Examiner to be discussed further during the hearing and imposed at his discretion during Site Plan Approval. A Traffic Study prepared by a consultant to Mr. Pierre (Michael R. Birdsall and Associates, May 29, 1998; copy attached) use national research currently being documented by the Institute for Transportation I 1716 W.MARINE VIEW DRIVE SECOND FLOOR • EVERETT,WA 98201-2098 • PHONE 425-259-3161 FAX 425-349-7554 E-MAIL office@dIykeman.net I I I I • Mem ers of the Renton City Council Re: ierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Engi eers (ITE), to show that gas stations, convenience stores and other service-oriented busi esses attract a la Ige number of "pass-by" trips, rather than destination trips, and ther fore trip eneration for purposes of calculating impact fees should be reduced and recalculat d as "trip equivalents." There was no discussion with Mr. Pierre or the traffic consultant prior to issui g the mitigated 1 DNS with full trip generation estimates for the proposed uses. The traffic consultant has subsequently been in communication with Neil Watts (Plan Review Sup rvisor, Development Services), and was advised that the traffic impact fee 's an adm•nistrative action, not imposed until issuance of a Building Permit. In a letter ated Octo er 30, 1998 ('copy attached), Michael Birdsall provided Mr. Watts with more information concerning the justification for trip length adjustments, which Mr. Watts sad he would consider. M .. Pierre wishes to keep this issue open while staff consider more current met 1odology for calculating trip generation associated with the proposed uses. Absolute Discretion to Modify Access Driv way locations on SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW have been selected ased on t e access and circulation requirements of fuel delivery trucks. Points of access and nsite circ lation are further constrained by vertical separation required from overhead powerlines. The astern-most driveway is proposed for separate access to the rental car/used car sales area. There is very little room for "discretion" associated with driveway locations that will still support the proposed uses on the site. We have coordinated proposed driveway location and widtas with staff, and would be happy to discuss possible minor additional adjust ents. However, we object to "absolute discretion" in this matter. Acc ss to/from Powell Avenue SW via the northeast access road through the Eagle Hardware core rate office parking lot is proposed in an existing 20-ft easement. This easemen was originally created several years ago to serve what was then a land-locked parcel (the are that juts northward in the site). The Eagle Hardware parking lot was designed around this ease ent, and accommodates through traffic. It would be a secondary access to the property (not heavily used), and beneficial to emergency vehicle access. I wi 1 participate in upcoming Council Hearings and/or Council committee meetings, and would be happy to discuss these issues with you further. • cerely, Ix . DA Mic ael L. Barthol,l AIA Dyk man Architects, representing James and Barbara Pierre 2 I I 1 Members of the Renton City Council Re: Ifierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File o. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R I Encl sures: 1. Ste Plan 2. affic Study (Mil hlael R. Birdsall,May 29, 1998) 3. Correspondence with Neil Watts (Michael R. Birdsall, October 30, 1998) 1 I cc: James and Barbara Pierre, Owner/Applicant Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties,Inc. Michael R. Birdsall, Transportation Planner Vicki Morris, Vicki Morris Consulting Services Jana Huerter, City of Renton Land Use Supervisor Peter Rosen, City of Renton Senior Planner . I I I 3 i I \ • \E 1/4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.2 ' \ ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M Ail. - - - - - - - -- -- / (]mom eAs °8ii;d � n • %aye_ \ uwsswPrao�r" WATER MI-1 '` \ ' SYMBOLS6' TOP 17.07 % SCREE AlYel..02(OUTTOP OF / • (OW 1 ;__]II • OIL/WATER SEPERATOR BLOW OFF V•LVE VALVE 11.22 `�_ ��� !_ ❑ CATCH BA51N __1'"��- -Q 55 MANHOLE 'l' _ ��� \ ® WATER MANHOLE -' 1 ® SIGNAL CABINET % \ y Z \ TS FIRE HYDRANT -'' /1 // �J D4 GATE VALVE _ /r�1 / XIj - _-. P. • ELECTRIC BOX y �� / __- 7' Q W d' BLOW OFF VALVE Mtn -- pew �i �!_ y \ o ORIGINAL GRADE ELEVATIONS Pam •N°'o \ -. r �- `l (SPOT ELEVATIONS) At7.r15t77, '� ,� -'- EXIST/NG SECONDARY OVERHEAD >I t.L.41, , ZO' DRIB - POWER LINE.(TO BE BURIED S- LIGHT POLE is- i-- p ���-' J^ e'- , _ -) ACROSS THE SITE). I I I T 1 WATER h1ETFR iy _/ _�-.- =, --1` ®imilv , .• 10'BUILDING y7 \ .. DRAINAGE,DIRECTION OF SLOPE J -� '1 DEG 7� -��� s - SETBACK 7 ,. -�' U • 1 � - - �� Miry u b :�' - • , \ o.,_,__) \ . "-®1=�.. -:.. i s Ij \ \ v cc 3 err ;..> ! /c J yo �Q • \ I•46.‘A i '•'a,.:: "' �' s / ¢ EXISTING OVERHEAD MAJOR POWER i �- •as' :::._;S "'*�L.'' '':;u;..n.: EXI TO REMAIN .s-� _ � �.. :gp4'• . : �+L ^fir Ti4;i\r :�h.. T1T� -�i'� �` • Ea w b l r-'p"-.:.. „� .0 .0 ;: ;:i'•i'"-, r;.,.�S'"�.'* - :°r,r, 11• i'- a t �` I fir ,Lid _' /�- __- 3\ .• ....1-.:.r.""r..ii!k. ,'. is<:: '.-.',,_-i -N ' ''"'[:: `:.: s+- xcray ri r-- - �e71,,:., ..-..°. 15 t.ANDSc i -�� :,L"• o:/•�:'•:.:�,, ., EtSCN ENCC`.c.,`=1R:.... ::-.:::: c';: d- .r• --ads >�fA:.:?..4::::• BU ER .. I- r' R n. ���- `�I�l� '�-' 7 f 2\ ' k "� ';:::) .. ��• ' y p5f -_Z, '4'11M" s,'04it0.. _ `11 ,\_t► '::.- may :: � - g > _____ ' ,1..: �:)a s'• ':.-:r" 515 ,_,.>' 'Ir' \ ice .^, } .. ` i37 .)rs g 15 t x. :�~ _.ram �. t� i S�., o° r c r� / • • ;?.S. , Vim \ \ ------ w -1 - .r 1.. •gyp,. ♦ . •i%s� _�. •�i...,. _ :r, •.. �� -w • rW q ........%\ _atifit 1,;-. ii. c. i-01.1„,-0. z. / G- _ // 1 �` 1t� f>''..._____ 9 / .0,, z., ,__ ::{i=::`'✓• 3} e^-' .Qm i riv um,b motes mm�ss v 5 / / �� _ J oQl tr;`.<.. rye . -:::::;8. Mo..:: = i �..�;�/� 0 • L C �J q ►: .::;: �„ z;.._. ':°'-:- gat •.. / / \ Jgu tat. ;y4;,:i:'is ;'.::' ,1► `"`:::� ' _ thouP.c e.,:: •i " s: '. p:; i., 1 .mot+ g6ySa- ---•,j 1 •ir'oa -: ....:.t.'.,;;`- t,. -Q• r :.5 k Ib b, J=r,�.�c -;Q.F...� ate'.-✓ m . .•.: .�� 9 H tin' y ,.-7 ac +-� g1% y��q�� � ,�� ���jq.� .. .. �0�`',..: 10' •PE'HW FER(EAST SECTION) • ,L{. o�s--'m.et-ate,:,: .s�::.. -S�+- •p2'`Y' ' ILI z � • b �} off' }- d - -'f3-.r'. h ui �' lilt"' {:'' .fiE ..Ob -.ne 4, :v...;::..; a• PROPERTY -, L� - ...: .y.. :, ' SITE PLAN NOTES ' � & 4.---- hill..+. G �13 ::;�r�:: .. �i / e �r�, ° _ w 1. Indicates building outline- ` - - - - - 2 Light pole Q a #°•% °:, q-�., � • ; �`; ✓ 3. -Tank arm. - \ (2) ♦ r!�-•:::y • 4. Trash nql OSufe C 5 yF.V`� y A'�S• 16 " �' 5. Canopy and gas pump location �/ -. AO 04011 �'LANDSCAPE BUFF ' SECT f`,`w < (� ', ���q 5 / , 6. Min. radius 2' at curb unless otherwise indicated. \ d , -3' : R'S /! v 7. Enterprise street signage • 20'= LDWG SETBACK w -'w Or .. •1 8. New contours 0¢G \ • 9. Existing contours 6 ts .% I... 11111t:.ro ' In v b'e� 10. Chevron Street signage L `��_ SITE PLAN INFORMATION - FROM 2 •TO13'''it. ,••.10 1-Total square footage of the site: 2.I4 Acres • 119354 sq.ft. 7 Pa7Ki nq-Frnoe ed ! � Convenience Store/Gas Station parking: 9_L-.. ..shandacapsstall iii t�9 v+ a 20'ThUp,pWG s� 2. wetland square footage: 0 sq.ft. Total Convenience Store/Gas Station parking: 10 parking stalls proposed Revisions O •/ 005.1 g SETBACK /fix•-'I�' 3. Landscaping square footage: No. Date Description y bb 1�9 \ / Natural Landscaping far Wildlife 6590 soft. (5.5%of site) Enterprise Car Rental/Salee (@+/o expansion) 48-9'-0° standard stalls Maintained Landscape area: 23013 sq.ft. 19.35 of site) 34-9'-0' dbl parked stalls m {{ Total square footage of Landscaping: 29603 sq.ft. (24.8X of sit 10-23.-0' parallel stalls 64 -8'-6° compact stalls • N exf• 2 - 12-0' handicap stalls 4. Building square footage: Total Proposed parking: (w/ expansion) 168parking stalls proposed . Convenience Store/Gas Station building: 1305 soft. P P P P P N Enterprise Car Rental/Car Sales building, 4480 soft. E e ro ose rk4n r (w/ expans+on) 46-O' 0' standard-sta++s • EXI5TWG POWE3.Lk'gE _ Enterprise-Fuiure-Expans4on: 448fl-so filar-Pr-fs -P P d--pa g= 34-9'-0' dbl parked stalls t4\111k\ co Tql\srotal building square footage: 11035 soft. (9.3% of site) I / 2 -23'-0° parallel stalls 5. Pavement square footage: - 44-B'-6' compact stalls - y__ o --- Existing-Impervious-Surfaces- 0-sgat. 2 12 4Y handicap stalls Q 1° New Pavement: 74415 soft. • Total Proposed parking: (w/expansion) 146 parking stalls proposed m New Sidewalk: 4101 sq.ft. New Building: 11035 so.it. 8. Allowable building height, N/A a / POWER RELOGA710 Total Impervious Surfaces: 89751 sq.ft. (75.22 of site) 9. Proposed building height: 19'-1' Project Director Approved By 10. Building setbacks required by code: 20,0' M1,8 o co 6. Parking Requirements: 11. Proposed building setbacks: 20.-0' O Convenience Stare/Gas Station: 5 stallsl1000 sq.ft. of building 12. Current zoning= CO-COMMERCIAL OFFICE Project Architect Cheated By rn .5(1305 sqq ft./1000) -6.53 (7) 13. Proposed zoning: IM-h1cDiL'M 1NOUSTRIAL rnEnterprise Car Rental/Car Sales: 1 stall/5000 sq.ft. of site 14. Construction type: VN Job Captain Drawn By SITE PLAN 119354 sq.1t.15000-23.87 (24) PA a Enterprise Office required parking: 4.5 stalls/1000 sq.ft. of building Project No. Drawing ND. `O.+c I"=40'(IF PRB(T I5 22X34) 4.5(5250 sq.f t./1000) -23.63 (24) Enterprise Future Expansion parking: 4.5 stalls/1000 sq.ft. of building 97080 Al(gpHK,c,,G/�,B 4.5(4480 sq.ft./1000) •20.16 (21) • A 7O r q 70 40 60 Total parking required: (w/o expansion) 55 parking stalls required Date . r_ - Total parking required: (w/ expansion) 76 parking stalls required • i ran-4t�• o 8-24-98 a MICHAEL .BIRDSALL AN1. iSOCIATES , Transportation Planiner"s ay 29, 1998 i s. Yield Morris icki Morris Consulting Services r 732 18th Ave ue NE I .eattle, WA 98115-4426 1 re: i amie Pierre Development Proposal rady Way &Oakesdale Avenue, Renton, WA 1 , l ear Ms. Mon s: 1 he proposed •ombination of a convenience store/gas station and car rental/used car sales operation, ith a future e pansion area, is subject to the City of Renton's traffic impact fee, based on daily trip :eneration. T 1 e attached table gives my current assumptions and calculations in support of the ' ollowing resul s: Phase 1 - Car rental and us'1ed car sales portion: 110 trip-equivalents $ 8,250 Phase 1 - Oas station/convenience market : 62 trip-equivalents $ 4,650 Phase 1 - Optional second story above Cony. Mkt: 7:trip-equivalents $ 525 Phase 2 -Future expansion area(restaurant @ 5,000 sq. ft.): 134 trip-equivalents $10,050 Total, all o tions and phas s�: 440 trip-equivalents $23,475 he term"trip-1 quivalents"refers to the net result after necessary reductions from total trip generation eased on ITE Trip Generation which would be 1,812 trips for the total site. First;reductions are ustomary for"pass-by"trips at(land uses that provide customer services. In addition, national research as confirmed that such land uses have very short trip lengths compared to other land uses. Residential •evelopments and office and industrial employment sites are all associated with average trip lengths of everal miles; while gas station i,convenience stores, and other service oriented businesses draw most •f their custo ers from existing traffic just"passing by"the site; or attract them from a very short radius about a mile) ound the site. The adjustment for equivalent trip length is necessary for balance (i.e., I exus logic) b tween fees charged from such developments and other land uses. I ote further th t Phase 2 trips would be somewhat fewer if the car rental/used car sales business were o expand in th "future" space,rather than a restaurant, which was analyzed here for purposes of a `worst ease"s enario. will be glad t review the assumptions with the City or the Client, and confirm or modify this analysis Is needed ther after. ! 1 .incerely, . e //a,,,,e 84 ,4, ichael R. Birdsall, I.T.E. ttachment please note new area code: (425) 25713 SE 164th Street • Issaquah, WA 98027 4 (206)392-7062 • Fax(206)392-8764 k TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE r Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady Way & Oakesdale Avenue, Renton WA_ SITE ACTIVITY TRIP-GENERArTION NET-IMPACT-FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction Net Impact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount 1.a Car Rental Business @ (1/3) of 5,000 sq. ft. & 142 parking spaces a. Reserve 10 parking spaces for employees and customers Rental fleet= (1/3) x (142-10) spaces= 44 spaces b.-Car-rental-cycle-=-1-/3-@-2-3-days-and-2/3-@ 7-14-days - — - Average rentals/week/car= 1/3 @ 2+2/3 @ .5 = 1.0 - rentals/wk/car: 1.0 - c. Each rental transaction generates 3 round trips=6 trip ends trips/rental: 6 d. Daily trips = car-spaces x (rentals/wk) x (trips/rental) / (5 days/wk) = 44 rental cars 1.2 52 e. On-site employees= 10 1 0 employees 2 20 f. Vehicle maintenance every 7,000 mi. @ 250 mi./rental 44 vehicles 0.07 4 = 28 rentals/mntc = .035 mntc/wk = .007 mntc/day x 2ways g. Miscellaneous deliveries, other visitors 1 site 20 20 Gross Total Trip Generation 96 h. Reduction for very short trip lengths @ 1/2 of site VMT 96 trips -50% -48 Item subtotal, Car Rental 9 6 -48 4 8 $75 $ 3,600 1.b Used Car Sales Business @ (2/3) of 5,000 sq. ft. & 142 parking spaces - Compare to ITE Class 841, "New Car Sales"-closest available reference-but remove half for the probably lower activity level at used car sales by rental comps flies a. Base for trip generation=2/3 of 5,000 sq. ft. building = 3.333 1000 s.f. • c. ITE Class 841 daily trip rate per 1,000 sq. ft. = 37.5 d. Estimated daily trips= 3.33 1000 s.f. 37.5 126 e. Adjustment for probable differences in activity levels, used car 126 trips -50% -64 sales vs.new car sales Item subtotal, Used Car Sales 126 -64 62 $75 $ 4,650. SUBTOTAL, Car rental and sales portion of Phase 1 222 -112 1 1 0 $75 $ 8,250 • C BIROSALL&ASSOCIATES Transportation Planners 29-May-98 page 1 of 2 F 2(45)3➢I476d 23713 SE lelth Sere•Issaquah,WA➢&!I7•(e5)J➢1.7➢62 1r TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE Jamie Pierre Development Proposal GradyWay&Oakesdale-Avenue;Renton WA - SITE ACTIVITY TRIP GENERATION NET IMPACT FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction Net Impact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount --------2.—Ga -Station/-Convenience Market @ 1,472 sf — a. ITE Land Use Class 853 (gross trip rate) 1.472 1000 sf 845.6 1244 - b. Reduction for pass-by trips 1244 trips -70% -871 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental&sales business 1244 trips -10% -125 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 248 net trips -75% -186 Item Total, Convenience Market&Gas Station 1244 -1182 62 $75 $ 4,650 2.b (Optional)Second Story Office&storage uses above Convenience Market a. ITE Land Use Class 710,General Office Building (gross trip rate) applies to half the unit; dead storage in other half 0.736 1000 sf 11.01 8 b. Reduction for pass-by trips . 8 trips 0% 0 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental place 8 trips -10% -1 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 7 net trips 0% 0 Item total, Second Story Office above Convenience Market 8 -1 7 $75 $ 525 SUBTOTAL, Convenience Market/Gas Station portion of Phase 1 1252 -1183 69 $75 $ 5,175 TOTAL, Phase 1 1474 -1295 1 79 $75 $ 13,425 I1 3. Future Addition of 5,000 sq. ft. rental space consistent with zoning Example: ITE Land Use Class 831 (Quality Restaurant) 5.000 1000 sf 89.95 450 Reduction for pass-by trips 450 trips s -40% -180 Reduction for short trip lengths of net new trips 270 net trips -50% -136 134 TOTAL, Phase 2 450 -316 134 $75 $ 10,050 - (RANQTOTALS-_FOR-ENTIRE-SITE• 1-924 -161-1 313 $75 $ 23,475 BIRTransponalion PlanDSALL&ASSOCners IATES 29-M 98 °y" page 2 of 2 Fax(425)391376a 25713 SE 164Ih Strsn•lnaquah,WA 98022•(425)3➢2.7062 1 —30-1998 9 57AM FROM IV MORRIS CONSULTING 206 523 4648 P..8 Is MICA L It BIRDSALL 1 ASSOCIATES - . Transpartatipn Planners -- . • 1 • I e - October 30, 1998 . Mr.Neil Watts • Planning/Building/Public Works Department - 1055 South Grady Way City'of Re I ton . Renton, A 98055 • . re: Pierre Grady Way Site Development Project No.LUA-98-125,SA-H,R,ECF Dear Mr. atts: • - Thank yot for the_time you,have taken to explain the City's methodology for evaluating traffic impact• - of develop ent. I have se Iiewed.your memo to Peter Rosen dated September 4, 1998,outlining your • traffic mitigation fee calcul�at ion. As I understand it,the calculations in that memo are not finalized by the hearing) examiner after tomorrow's public hearing,and will be subject to change by administrative • '.action,up!o the date of issuance of a building permit. Therefore,by this letter I am presenting to you •important cw information which.supports a major reduction in the traffic impact fee for the subject development. I trust that this information will be incorporated in your updated calculations for the developm nt by the time of application for building permits. • There are two areas of concern: . . . (I (a) Revisions to the official description of the proposed development,and . • ' . (b) Justification of impact reductions on account of short trip lengths. (a) Revised Siteigscriptioa . Most im tly,the impact fee associated with the potential restaurant in phase 2 should be replaced by a calcul tion based on an expansion of the phase 1 car rental business-not a restaurant. My May 2', 1998,.anal sis had included a possible restaurant use solely in response to a request from the City's Ian -use planner for a"worst case']review of potential uses under the proposed rezone,but that use was - • never contemplated by the applicant. Understandably,your own fee calculation simply re-used the lane use assumptions in my report. But since the actual site plan being reviewed contains no restaurant and never will,the inclusion of a restaurant in traffic impact fee calculations should be seen as a non-bindin; - "what-if"what-if' calculation that does not apply in fact to the actual development proposal at hand. I In addition the applicant has removed the 2nd story office from the site plan,and adjusted the square footages o the car rental and sales building between phase 1 and phase 2 (5,250 sq.ft for phase 1,and ' .4,480 sq. for phase 2,totalling 9,730 sq.h. instead of 10,000 sq. ft.). kb)Justificition of Trip Length Adjustments • Apparently the City has not Heretofore considered variations in trip lengths as a factor affecting the -. traffic miti ation fee calculation. In my view,this is a dangerous simplification that could place the Ci , plum hall?WV 4te4 Cedl: /¢25) `� 1 25713 SE 164th Street • Issaquah. WA 98027 • (206)392-7062 • Fax(206)392.8764 . 1 1 • • 1 11-30-1998 9158AM FROM;V MORRIS CONSULT ING. 206 523 4648 P. 9 • at risk of serious challenge, on the ground of unfair"taking"that is not adequately correlated to the impacts of development. I was glad to hear from you that the City would be willing to consider a change iri its methodology if that were to be demonstrably more fair and equitable than its current flat fee per trip. To that end,I have obtained research data from Mr.Steven Tindale,President of Tindal - OIiver,Inc.,who is Chair;of a committee of the Institute of Transportation Engineers overseeing publication of research iri this area. Mr.Tindale's committee will soon publish a"Traffic Characte#istics Toolbox"through I.T.E. which will include the research findings to date on trip len with special application to impact fees. Mr.Tindale very kindly provided me with an advance copy of summary suniary table from tiaat•research. I sorted that table on the average values of trip length by land use to create the attached table. ;Notice that the classes of land uses representing convenjnce markets aria gas stations jve the shortest tip lengths of all land uses.at about one-third the trip lentath of most residential and t "icelindustiial a nplovmentid uses, Accounting for this difference would bring the amount of actual impact into the range which I estimated in last May's report. Mr.Tindale's research was undertaken in Florida explicitly to address issues of fairness.and equity in • traffic impact fees,so as to eliminate the concern about"takings". Trip length is frequently used as a key factor in impact fees in that state,where the measure of impact is"vehicle-miles"rather than"trips". • For confiiiuiation of this data,you can reach Mr.Tindale in Tampa,Florida,at(813)226-2106. The Tindale data is very credible information for the City of Renton to rely on to refine its traffic mitigati•n fee schedzle. . • • For a separate perspective on trip lengths,you might contact the city staff who operate the citywide traffic forecasting model. They'will confirm that the traffic forecasting model(which predicts the trip patterns which impact fees are meant to mitigate)also relies on trip length assumptions that would be broadly consistent with the Tindale data,although operating on a more simplified set of general land e categories. I have personally designed traffic impact mitigation schedules for other cities using a combination of both types;of data: traffic model distributions of trips by general category of land use, plus scaling by I.T.E.data and pass-by assumptions for specific sub-types within the general land use categories. I would be happy to share that methodology with you,if you are interested. Ii • In summary,please cortsideria general revision to the City's methodology to account for trip lengths, • then prepare a revised fee calculation that includes that revision,as well account for the changes described above in the project description. • Feel free t caIl me to discuss further any aspect of this issue,at your convenience. • • Sincerely,-il'aidit/4€:)11444 Michael R.Birdsall,I.T.E. Atnchmcnts cc: Vicki Morris • • -I r9 W Factors Affecting Traffic Impacts of Land Use. .. m {.T.E. General Average Average Average 00 w LU Code LT.E. Land Use Units Land Use Category Trip Lenlith Trip Generation %New Trips ,--. co 130 industrial Park - 1000-sf Industrial' 9.00 7.18 I 91% - HI 03 220 Apartment OU Residential 7.00 6.57 100 (11 310 Hotel Rooms Residential 6.84 8.47 68% a D nfa General Recreation Acres Recreational: 6.55 2.11 100% 3 • nla • District Park Acres . Recreational: 6.65 3,10 100% _ 540 Junior!Community College Student Miscellaneous: 6.60 1.45 95% cri 0 890 Furniture Store ' • 1000 sf Retail: 6.43 4.81 54% `o u 210 Single Family Dl! • Residential 6.18 . 8.99 100% --- ---330--Rea-cirt-HQtei - Rooms - Residential 6.10 - 18.80 83% 03 XO -- --- ---------- -- - ---1000 sf----Office and Financial: -- ----5.63-----A--- -16.79 ------- 83% -- --- - - -� 3- - -- ---810--Hospital-- ------ 222 High Rise Apartment OU Residential 5.62 4.20 100% ," < 710 Office over 100,000 GSF 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.48 11.25 92%710 General Office 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.44 11.01 93% 3 O 714 Corporate Office 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.44 7.72 93% Xl 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse DU Residential 5.43 5.88 100% . RV Park acre . Residential ' 5.40 74.40 100% (n 710 Office between'10,000-100,000 GSF 1000 sf. Office and Financial: 5.39 13.35 92%6 110 tight Industry 1000 sf Industrial: 5.38 6.99 94% Z 140 Manufacturing 1000 sf Industrial: 5.38 3.88 • 94% 320. hotel Rooms Residential 5.35 7.92 73% to r 150 Warehouse 1000 sf Industrial: 5.35 4.91 94% to E 310,320 Hotel!Motel Rooms Residential 5.28 6.93 72% , 710 Office under 10,000 GSF 1000 sf Office and Financial: 5.27 22.64 93% cn Z 232 High-Rise Residential Condominium DU Residential 5.25 4.19 100% r> 0 ' 420 Manna Berths Recreational: 5.25 2.98 97% r N Middle School Student Miscellaneous: 5.20 • •1.10 100% g Si 550 LMiversity Student Miscellaneous: 5.20 2.40 100% Ul Concrete Plant acre Industrial: 5.10 15.60 92% N Ul Stand Mining acre Industrial: 5.10 2.00 92% o cri W Contractor Trades 1000sf Industrial: 5.10 20.00 81% r, 732 Post Office 1000 sf Misoa aneous: 5.10 108.19 85% Vi P 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 5.10 54.00P• 5901 JailLib bed Miscellaneous: 5.10 1.21 85% 571 Jail • 730 Government Office 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 5.10 68.90 92% 841 New and Used Car Sales 1000 sf Retail: 5.03 40.97 79% 720 Medical Office 1000 sf Office and Financial 5.01 35.17 84% ' 530 High School Student Miscellaneous: 5.00 1.40 95% 430 Golf Course • Park Space Recreational: 4.83 7.73 93% 492 Racquet Club 1000 sf Recreational: 4.83 • 17.11 94% 412 County Park Park space Recreational: 4.80 2.55 90% - 491 t iennis Court court Recreational: 4.80 31.04 90% ea w aT-p Cen5ih ra.Pact t of-2 - - tt't - 11/2/9tl 3:42 PM • 11 . l51 Factors Affecting Traffic impacts of Land Use cc I.T.E. General Average Average Average a LU Code I.T.E. Land Use Units Land Use Category _ Trip Length Trip Generation % New Trips - 15t-Mini--warehousing 1000-sf-- industrial: . 4;73 2.-50 r 94% IS 560 Church 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 4.63 9,21 92% G 240 Mobile Flame Perk DU Residential 4.48 4.81 100% C 820.6. Retail:1,250,000&Above 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 4.45 27.26 84% 3 820 Retail:Greater than 1,000,000 1,000 sfgla Retail: 4.40 .• 26.71 85% 820.5 Retail 500,000-1,249,999 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 3.97 29.86 . 81% ' 820 Retail:Between 100,000.1,000,000 1,000 sfgla . Retail: 3.85 • 29.84 82% 7 620 Elementary School Student Miscellaneous: 3.80 1.06 90% . • C - - - - - P 840- Auto Re-al - - - 1000 8f - Retail: - =-3.73 A - 34.03--- 72% - - - - - 3 831 Quality-Restaurant 1000 sf---- --- --Retail: - - ----- 3:55 - -- - -93;23 - 77% < 252 Congregate Care Facility DU • Residential • .3.50 .. 2.35 74% 820.4 Retail: 400,000 -499,999 1,000 Ogle Retail-detailed 3.40 35.72 76% 837 Quick Lubrication Bays Retail; 3.38 42.54 71% z 849 Ttre Store Bays Retail: 3.38 30.55 71% X 832 Hi9t-Tumover Restaurant 1000 sf- Retail: 3.11 167.87 73% (/. 620 Nursing Home Beds Residential 3.10 2.61 88% • Fire Station w!o beds 1000 st Miscellaneous: 3.10 5.40 89% C - 847 Car Wash - 1000 sf Retell; 3.00 129.60 69% 2 n!a Local Park . Acres Recreational: 3.00 3.10 100% C 820.3 Retail: 300,000-399,999 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 3.00 41.85 72% r 444 Movie Theater • Screens Miscellaneous: 2.82 124.40 83% t- 911 Sank wd no(love-thru 1000 sf Office and Financial: 2.78 148.54 42% 2 912 Bank wi Drive-thru 1000 sf Office and Financial: 2,68 265.21 49% C. 850 Supermarket 1000 sf Retail: 2,65 113.71 - 50% n WA Corwenlenoe with gas and fast food 1000 sf . Retail: 2.65 603.45 33% a 820.2 Retail: 200,000-299,999 1,000 sfgla Retail-detailed 2.85 44.03 74% 620.1 Retail: 100,000-199,999 1,000 Aria Retall-detailed 2.55 54.18 67% a Veterinary Clinic 1000 sf Miscellaneous: 2.50 32.80 70% O. . 820 Retail:Between 10,000-100,030 1,000 sfgla Retail: 2.38 • 70.07 . 62% 820 Retalt 50,000-99,9'39 1,000 sfgle Retail-detailed 238 70.07 62% R 585 Day Care - - 1000 st Miscellaneous: • 2.33 75.17 73% a 820 Retail: 10,000-50.000 • . '1,000 Ogle Retail-detailed 2.30 91.70 59% • 844 Gas Station pumps Retail: 2.23 144.85 24% 820 Retail: 0-10,000 1,000 Ogle Retail-detailed 2,20 167.60 48% 834 Fast Food Restaurant 1000 st Retail: . 2.17 564.11 59%J 820 Retail:Less than 10,000 1,000 sfgla Retail: 2.05 - 161.35 48% 853 Convenience Store with Gas Pumps 1000 sf Retail: ' 1.85 740.95 29% 851 Convenience Store 1000 sf Retait: 1.70 727.10 46% , source:Tlndale-Oliver.Inc.,Tampa,FL, 'Comparison of Impact Fees and Variables" Trip .ength_S4rdles-Tindele,Charts,page 2 et 2 • Saudr A A w.er aer 110/88 3:42 PM • . Z S_J B.mETER u 6314940 :! UMF R= To DECK 0) .,te r)- eft, J AM THE DYKEMAN DI/1 ARa�rtEcrs 1716 W. MARINE VIEW DR.,2ND FLOOR EVERETT,WA 98201-2098 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 , r.,..,_ .. V I C ICI, '"', MORRIS <`v = - CONTSULTING • - : ;.=- SERVICES �`N' �i� L✓4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE �"C % .xo, PROPOSAL PREPARATION ?:,�.1417, %�% "y„ PERMIT ASSISTANCE Members of the City Council November 30, 1.98 City of Renton 1055 SJ Grady Way CIT Y OF RENTON Renton' WA 98055 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale,File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H,R DEC 1 1 1998 Objection to Recommendation Against IM Rezone RE,EIVED CITY CLE"K'S OFFICE Dear City Council Members: I am writing on behalff of James and Barbara Pierre, property owners and applicants for Rr zone and Site Plan Approval, to express disagreement with the Hearing Examiner's recommeno ation dated November 19, 1998. The Hearing Examiner has recommended against the request for IM zoning ion a 2.74-acre site in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Oakesdale Avenu- SW with SAT Grady Way. We have been advised by staff that it is not necessary to appe‘l the Hearing Examiner's recommendation because it is not a decision. It is our understanding th.t the City Celuncil is the decision maker for the rezone request. We look forward to working wi h the Planning & Developm'ent Committee to answer any questions and discuss this project in more detail. I summarize below the history of this request, and point out erroneous assumptions contai ed in the Hearing Examiner' recommendation. Mr. Pierre and memb rs of the consultant team have met with staff and maintained fre I uent communications to confirm appropriate and acceptable uses for this property since the latt:r half of 1996. Mr. Pierre' communications have been with Sue Carlson, Economic Develooment Director. He also met with the Planning Commission during their consideration of Lan' Use Code amendments to allow mini-marts with gasoline service stations in the IM zone. The Purpos? statement for these Land Use Code amendments, as stated in the Commission b efing paper dated December 30, 1997 reads as follows: "The purpose of the amendments is to allow for gas stations and uses commonly associate, with them such as mini-marts, auto repair,fast foot restaurants and car washes in a consiste .t and logical manner. The work program has come in part due to inquiries from a property 0 ner [Mr. Pierre]who is interested in requesting a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Indu trial- Medium (IM), and developing a gas station and mini-mart as well as an auto leasing bu iness along Grady Way." 7732 18TH AVENUE NORTHEAST • SEATTLE,WA 98115-4426 • FAX: (206) 523-4648 • PHONE: (206) 5P2-8057 Members of the Renton city Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R November 30, 1998 To the best of my knowledge, the Land Use Code amendments were unanimously approved with full awareness of the proposal for the Pierre Grady Way site at SW Grady Way/Oak,sdale Avenue SW. My communications have been with Jana Huerter, Land Use Supervisor; Rebecca Lind, Lisa Grueter and Don Erickson in the Office of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Pla 'ng; and with Peter Rosen and Mark Pywell in Development Services. Other members .f the consultant team have communicated closely with Neil Watts and Paul Lumbert in Public orks concerning the stormiater management proposal, earthwork, utilities, traffic and circulation Mr. Pierre l}as been successful in attracting a Chevron gasoline station with mini mart, and Ente 'rise rental car agency/used car sales as tenants for the site. The City has adopted Land Use Co, and Comprchensive Plan amendments over the course of the past year that have narrowe the availab le zoning for these uses on the subject site to Medium Industrial. These actions hay been taken With full awareness of the Pierre Grady Way site proposal, and apparent inte t to accommodate it. The proposed uses are now prohibited in the existing Commercial Office one. The alternative of seelung Arterial Commercial zoning for the site would require assemblag of a minimum of 5 acres, nd would constitute a spot zone in this area. Properties east, we t and northeast of the site are zoned IM(see Zoning Map, attached). The "Justification for Rezone" prepared for this application (copy attached) gives a d ailed history of the changes, that have occurred since this project was first presented to the Cit in a Preliminary Project Review meeting on January 24, 1997. It also describes the utual coordination between staff and the applicant during the course of these changes. Concerns expressed by the Hearing Examiner that undesirable industrial uses could potenti lly be developed on the site under IM zoning seem to the applicant to be unfounded. Mr. Pierre s not requesting a speculate''e rezone, but rather submitted a complete application for concurren Site Plan Approval. Significant investments of time and money have been made to develop t le site plan to the degree required to respond to City of Renton detailed Site Plan Ap•royal requirements. Neither the owner/applicant, nor Chevron or Enterprise is likely to walk awa from these investments. Mit. Pierre would not have proceeded with this level of detailed plannin_ and commitment to tenants without evidence in the form of supportive staff comments along th- way that the project was aciceptable and welcome at this location. Mr. Kaufman's Concl Sion #2 (page 6 of the November 19, 1998 Report, Recommendatio and Decision document) reflects an erroneous assumption. He states that "It would appear th•t the applicant is looking fpr an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier reque is to extend qhe Auto Mall Improvement district•to include this site were rejected." I was encou aged in Marl h 1998 by Rebecca Lind to inquire about draft Land Use Code amendments being considered for an Automall designation for, properties fronting SW Grady Way. t her recommendation, I contacted Don Erickson, and obtained information on Automall B pe fitted 2 Members of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R November 30, 1998 uses and development standards. I reported this information to Mr. Pierre and the design earn. We investigated whether the provisions of the Automall overlay might be less restrictive an• thus make ste planning somewhat easier. We were invited, early in the process, to reque t the Automall designation concurrent with a rezone to IM (since only properties zoned IM, IH •r CA are included within the Automall expansion area). Mr. Pierre decided not to request the overlay, since it was developed for some other purpose that the uses he proposes. It is my understa ding that the City adopted and Use Code amendments to implement the Automall expansion a ea in June 1998, prior to submittal of the Pierre Grady Way site application for Rezone and Sit: Plan Approval on August 14, 1998. I received a follow up communication from Don Erickson on August 21, 1998 that the opportunity to request this overlay had likely passed (a copy of w 'ch I provided to the Hearing Examiner), but Mr. Pierre had long since eliminated it fro his consideration. Information conveyed to me by Don Erickson indicated that the Pierre Grady Way s to at Oakesdlale was excluded from the Automall B designation purely because of existing CO zo ning, not for any other reason as speculated in the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion #3 (page 7 of the November 19, 1998 Rieport, Recommendation and Decision document). During our three years of communication with staff concerning this project, we have been assured that the option to request an IM rezone was available, since adjacent properties east and west along SW Grad Way are zoned IM, as is the industrial park northeast of the site along Powell Avenue SW. The development potential of this small parcel is significantly constrained by it's narrow 'dth, unusua shape, and fragmentation caused by electrical power transmission easements. Whe City development standards are applied (setbacks, landscaping, and parking requirements), devel pable area is reduced even further. The property has remained vacant since it was annexed to th City in 1959i. The proposed uses are nationally recognized businesses with attractive, well-main ained facilities. Proposed landscaping exceeds minimum requirements. It seems that the proposal ffers a more(desirable alternative at the west gateway to the City than a vacant, weed-covered site We respectfully request that you review this letter and attachments, and confir our communications with staff. We will participate in full Council hearings and in Council co 'ttee meetings to respond to any questions you may have concerning this request for Rezone an• Site Plan A proval. Sincerely, ai Vicki Morris Permit Assistance Consultant to James and Barbara Pierre 3 Members of the Renton City Council Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale File Nol LUA-98-126, SA-H, R November 30, 1998 Enclosures: 1. Zoning Map 2. Site Plan 3. Project Narrative dated 8/24/98) 4. Justification for Rezone (dated 8/14/98) cc: James and Barbara Pierre, Owner/Applicant Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties, Inc. Mike Barthol,Dykeman Architects Jana Huerter, City of Renton Land Use Supervisor Peter Rosen, City of Renton Senior Planner • 4 • • F2 • 13 T23N R4E E 1/2 C D i z -�I�M . E-------- . i c S7thSt. N . CD • • • • I M • - /1--- ..-._L \\\'• IM I1M • \ Cci5 . ..:%.• . 1\to .-,E--, •• I . �o \i - . .. . • \ `W . /1____-•-,--A- • ' .‘ _ "II M � a/G-C'e4 N. i lit:: : }.SII 1I6tIhMS - - IS .. , j,• . j IM `\ '° i N . • • • •.IM: •-k _ . • co \. a • I i i . I • j c,p*L CI • .• 1 •\ • • iy I . HZ 25 T23N R4E E 1/2 4 0 ; go ZONING .1;400O G 2. ` f Pima=mum swims • FN,�o� 011 24' T23N R4E E 1/2 . . _ ..-. \ J1-NE.] 1/4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RC7E-. 4 t:---. ,W.M. .--- . -- 1° \ . • \ .7 .7/ ' • 4 \ ___ - . ..,-. i \ \ _----_----------__--- _4 Bn RI- .?.1 1.6 \ WAVY OCTIO O&M i i WATER lks. \,.. -------- ....... I ge.T .... ' \ SYMBOL-5 01..,WAT5.12 5E11-CATOR O CATCrt 5,4501 O 55 MA4101.1• ...01.0 0.17'CO. B.LOW OF?V••VS Vark..1/?. II 2 2 .\- \ „::-------- - ,____.----- ,t.4 1011'6 -- _---- - 8 • . t \ 0 %ATER/i,A•rtC)LE ....--- -- - = .- ------ ,---'--------- $ \ \ CECE 5J5NAZ.CA5nET .0 me”SPRANT / __,--/L------------------- / '-' ...yr"..- \ 11 7 Cr) 2 \ \ Xi 6ATS Va4.15. El 5V-GTRG BOA 1:2N5A2 AT ,,,,,,,am..., .---,--- / --•--- """IdecK------ i weirs ( . .,cf 5,fh.,,,,Off,VAL,,VE,,,v wsawad a, -... .,,,..,..„1,19;03, 4- \ -\- „..-7,40,...____- - - \-1:: ,-,.10-42N-Aff.....,- /-- t.147,0,75..Re.7 • LL_I I \ 1.. .-iii•-- 4s - .•..e...cms-5iuse \ \ \ (5POT 5..evATiOSe53 tea LIC•rsT?012. Et V,ATCR DCETCR ,S, 04000.T 4\ \ t'..-.40.4.4... •".. - Cr'--.- \ \ ,,,L4 MANAGE.CARCZTiON PP 6,022 ,...ss, v.....,.. ---•-, ,1 ,%i°..- -". . ..•.101.V. --- 15, .• . ..... • '... \--. \ ,--- ".." -,-."--- N,..1.,----•-..---...." 1---,.-... ...,er----- -1---- _----...c...-,--fro •- .... . , 0 -- I ., -/"------H... .. . \I .- - _Ca.57"64610.-74,.....CS2 ns,..50 n • .1 • •1100.... ...--- ---' .." / '....- ' C......1.-a-----.-- ------- -..":::.--,-77-,_„_ _.• 0-• •• - . CV6 ...;4 0 ...:-- . 1, • '.. \ i LiJ i 1 \ , \ \ - - -----1:-.----- \ ,----,...__-.---;--,---•- •7 as.,,,.•• 4,..... °W.' .-,,,,--,`Z. ,••-"Z:.......:• *Fi.•,,,, - \ \ \ lii.,..1W, -,--r.--,E5-.7.-"--..----- *.i.""-'"'"i*,.........:••- •' -.r.•-4-_ ••• r-tt F.41i.TN;r Q. \ \ ' ....',•,....1.171 " ., ra ,.„,..r•-• ;.....4S',,It. .....,,,,,11,..,'.'"';,..7 ,>,-.`,.•,II..-----•. \ , \ ....,.....-......* , . •...IAN 6C..........%; - '•.. . S.,,C.seDN'...55"iv`,- ..,•° . ..-- ' '''. .tosolitt"-- --::-..:----_----------77-/' ' • • ' - Ac,..i . 4:17:-.risb,,,. :_y:-....-,.%--' -..,..-"--_.--- . ....., .= ...ow." . • .- - -. -: 0=0.116 i-. /2 ...1 N....ir• -..r.n.-6- .,1::::.s......,......s,::::,..-. 2e1........A,-.40 „,,, .. .. _. __.. , .. ; . 0 : li ,::L •.' / ' = -- -c--..::: _. . ...,tta',.1_..._!.,,,,,-r":'"-.- -;.111,.........„ ,.:-., ----•_,... •. 0-...,,,,- x v-- -__. ,,',..i.--..',4-. '-''12-/ \ \s i...,_----- \ .....--,.,-- -------- b i wi+i'11 ; __ ...;.)4/1!'') i % -.---'.1% -*/-4--,----------.;------., _ ..3-.... ,---. ,,',.r • . 7' ,;•," • \V.\\*\-.1 • "".` - --'' ,r% „_---_,---'---- ___.___-_-•\--e'3*,\ -.1:?-- \ .- -• .., / =-----,'..: ‘ --_..r:_•-•.-.-.-.••.-7.''. ;;Ala - ". . -',:f:',,. t..•:. ",.,y-',11 . - _ ,- ---_---.,-_----- N _-,------.:.--- isla-,••-- --.. ,'\,±2_2--".... ..01k ‘,...t.ic.,....,.. • ' --' -"'''-- ,-__7-,---,-- -::-....7-.*_,----141,7" r;k•trer...." . .•!'..ovr.,.. ..... ,k, i\ roo;onom_ I,,- ..er• ........,,,e' ' . ,..:--0-rc Vltit:.0 V, ..1 \ire>„--- _.......,„_---- __v....v....v.-- • ---Y .----- 1 ..,.....3:44445•,............,. C _ , \ .- tS' \ \ . ''----..--_ . _,....,---''°IA'!Sr.----: 'VII)oil . - ° .. j,,,S,,.7P.,t..7.5,1-s.,.,‘ ... ' , •1 .1 ' .1%7.",,-‘ ..1 \\ ‘A. . ..::-. .., ‘,;A•-•\7 OP, ' .,,,..,... . ...0 411 ,\....,\ ii,\v„ ,, ••-.„'_.7,__.,,,..--- , Vicf.-4 ., 11111,- r 14.1'..1.21.-,114 , , .-A. . . -,.... - . .., .. - A ..x. , , -s> . . 1:1,....:\ .. .-.:•../; •;,„4-4.1 • , !eift, c ______ __t- _--- .,-------_----- _---, __--- _ -- ....- -----: ...-----/----- --- ------% --------- tI3 I- LB '_DR61-teri}ANT?. k . 0.op• 10 .4., ,s2,.- . ',.• .../ ' --- ..".- e. .....---- NO ----// SITE PLAN NOTES V .... ,,......•-••"- a=>-- Ne I- 2. L.ge%tOi0 CI <1;N' c •r''' •• '""'-f:..,;#P7 . _- • ----- V4 \\ \\ ..\••u. 4:4Z,‘,..'17 '...?!;-•.,,:.s-\ :.• .‘>' -- : .-!4•••,- ir'to"• - ._. osi np'c':f'aEnrn:eCin:.l. sr:ee: < 0 :.,° • „ ,,,,,,..,,\ . t. '• '."--. , P..°1- -- \ . 9 ...-----____ .g 9. Ex.S1,np sanscurS § \\\\ \ ' Ito< . 10. Cnevron street s,;nape . \\‘ IA \ ,%,...fr.„.._,-).,.,t=.-55 ,..„0,4_, ____------- ----------;>------ SIT PLAN INFORMATION e 11 -rw...,,,Ts.:it.. ,-.i.>,.,. .....,......------ , :„.i spume lamas ol tee s•ts, 2.2,1 acres•stine so., 7. '''''COic•!;:;n:Dce Slates CAS Slat,:,aars,a, 9-9.-O-S.M.stai is • ' • 0 sp., •+2'4,r.atO.ca,wiL__ „.„,,,,... 2. sato,.square towage. Tstai Cony...nee Store/507 Statmn.ryrrp: 10 spars;sta.dm:rases ;NNN M. Dare Ctest-•21.cr. L' 0, 3. •e-assacend sours lamas, Eetercr,ss Clr Rental/Saies,1.,a et:vs.:DI sti-9••0•standard stalls * , ..".e. y.' \ Natural,andscaCts2 fal.....t.' las•st..ssaLaDdscare 21.4. sat.sure forage DI tandscasms, C593 sts•11.15.52 of artel 9'.0-act PUY.stalls 10-23.-0.walla,stalls C.•8,6'CO,C2C1 staits .,./ ,.../.."'"-------'., t 11111k ........../.''''''....-/V--5-7-N G PODIA tte ) ' c''''''CEDtIntontItVeMarl ps,,eu,,Zssoee rarCrtaosTr;wc5ese;nas E3tGa,ca4l s/fSCaaetarl atSsI oaent,ecs umrtsiimnve s: ,,1'4 2225055 5ssitd•.i,.t11 1•. .l9.32 of sets) iEs,t,ae,i p, paa-s•en) ' ?4a.•I 5Ce,,--•-99263.',•....9D50.•n0---.-tssaIn ./.'' . socsmaatt 0arr2mDaao Ua.sIlstsi Pde-a.Sl ac11l,cS2ie35t1Lsa11.s25l3..a sS. . 5. ''eIl l T:;Z::OilS\ S2,10:45 2 •.2-0-sa+2,a2 513.15 I4N11.3.11. . law Dramas:m.1,I.,e•Da•s•as) 1,5 a.....a rails arca:sec 1 - Ne•Pa...eats .g, Ns.Sost•ale,, t4ty Du,ra,,,a, 4101 sa.ts. 11035 sa 1, B. sits.aake a,,:d.,s Wirt. 9. Drapes.pots,ns nsiant: WS a \ . PC7*..li .20212ATC., Tani:mast...*Surfaces, 6. '-in,e'sr's.cTitare/Gas Sutras, 09751 52.11.115.21 of srtel 5 slat iss1=soil.of Dui isms 50305 so.st./1002).6.53 III 10. Batietna,setaacss resurrec Dy cadet 11. Prunes bolsters salaams 12. Cur rent to:,,;,13. Rome:zan.es, CC-CDAEIN.Cif10E Ia•sED:Las PODS1DIAL Braga Daeascr asac•so By KZ Oragrt. ovrAtect CSL.0..By .9 Entrar•sa Car Denial/Car Salsas 1 staiti5200 so..t.al SP. .. Const ruat roe type, . J30 I...0040 L'Ilft41 04 -,,, 11935.so.11.60oo.23.87(241 -PA 5rr5 PL-AN ,n,..„,„OM.!adores sa...2. 2,12V2%'.7.sUl.• 3131? 00374 Saa. Y'so...,g,.. Y r•40'CP FONT 15 22534) 16 Enter:11as Fa...Citaansron Drama, •.5 stalls/1030 se.,Di 1.101, 4,,a.w,..it./122C).20.16 1217 170e0 .4t,•,4444,.,-.4...1,5--400414.- ,04 --Ali--__ 30 0 D2 40 pp f;;;;g.:!nrr:L'T.r:: VTggrsg?' parkIng ass.,le.,led B tze; 8-24-9e, . 2 1111111111 .. - . Project Narrative Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW Th- Pierre Grady Way site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW is 2.74 acres in size (119,354 sf). The property fronts on SW Grady Way, and extends east/west between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW. The site h s no significant natural features. The Pierre Grady Way site is currently vacant, with the exception of high voltage power lines that pa+through in an east/west direction, and north/south electrical distribution lines that c.,nvey power from the high voltage lines for local use. The metal towers, plinths, wood utility pole , guy wires arid guy wire anchors are fixed features. At the time of this application, the owne I was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound Energy Services to place some power lines undergroun., and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated is to bury the east/west power lines from the e.•t end of the open drainage channel to Powell Avenue SW, and relocate the north/south power lines off-ite to the west. Fill was placed on,he Pierre Grady Way property in 1997. City of Renton Grading Lice .e B- 970552 was obtained o bring the site up to grade with surrounding streets and sidew. •. A subsurface stormwater conveyance system was installed in a former open drainage channel throu• the property during the fill and grade action. Approximately 100 feet of the open channel remains .t the west en l of property, a f jacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. Channel side slopes have been re' .rced with gabion walls. T e channel bottom and side slopes have been seeded with grass to provide biofiltraaion— stormwatbr quality treatment prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel., The .ite is approximately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, and separated from this drainage course by the Oakesdale Aven U e SW right-of-way (a 5-lane section with curb, gutter and sidewalk o both sides). The proposal includes constructing a gasoline service station, mini mart (convenience store , and car rental/sales office on the site with associated utilities, parking and landscaping. Preferred t: ants with whom the owner is negotiating include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The mini mart proposed in the southwest corner of the site will be a one-story building, with a foo print approximately 1,300 s' in size. Four fueling islands are proposed, to be covered by a c. opy approximately 2,650 sf in area and just under 20 ft high. A building pad approximately 10,001 sf in size is proposed on the northern parcel. Initial construction includes building slightly more than half of this single-story structure (5,250 sf) at the east end of the footprint to be occupied by the car rental/sales operation. The remaining portion of the building footprint area (4,480 sf) is planned as a possible future expansion area for the car rental/sales agency, and is not part of the current Sit Plan Approval application. Total impervious surface area on the site will be approximately 89,751 sf( 5%). Onsite parking is p 1oposed for approximately 168 cars. Ten of these spaces are allocated o the gas station/mini mart, and the remaining 158 spaces are proposed for the car rental/sales use. The proposed number of parking spaces exceeds City of Renton minimum requirements for the'pro osed uses, which total 7 spaces for the mini mart and 41 spaces for the car rental/sales use. Based n the applicant's long-standing experience in the car sales business, and the proportionately small size f the site for a car rental/sal 1 s operation, the larger number of spaces is needed. In the event th t the Enterprise future expansion area is constructed at some future time, onsite parking for th car rental/sales use will b I reduced to approximately 146 spaces — still well above minimum ode requirements, and satisfactory for the proposed uses. The additional parking to be provided do s not compromise any other known Code requirements or site amenities(e.g., landscaping). No onsite vehicle maintenance is contemplated by either Chevron or Enterprise Rent- -Car. Vehicle washing is proposed associated with the car rental/sales use only, and will occur in an en losed garage-like room at th a rear of the structure, equipped with a drainage collection system tha will discharge to the sanitary sewer. The proposal incl des installing two 20,000-gallon UL-rated underground fuel storage anks associated with the gas station use. These will be constructed, installed and operated in accon ance with Washington Department of Ecology standards and other applicable regulations. One 20 000- gallon tank will be used for regular unleaded gasoline. The other 20,000-gallon tank will be segre.ated into two compartments: approximately 14,000-gallon-capacity for supreme unleaded gasoline and 6,000-gallon-capacity fqr diesel fuel. The tanks will be double-walled fiberglass construction. The outer wall will provide redundancy to the inner wall, in the event of a spill or leak. A leak detection monitoring.system will. be installed and wired for notification inside the mini mart building. Mini mart employees will be alerted by this system to potential dangers or leaks associated with the under wound fuel storage tanks, and will be trained in appropriate emergency response procedures. For new points of driveway access to the site are proposed: two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Avenue SW, and a fourth at the northeast corner of the site. Access to/from Powell A enue SW ' be provided in an existing 20-ft wide easement through the Eagle Hardware corporate ffice parking lot. The applicant requests modification of City of Renton commercial driveway 'dth standar s for the westernmost Grady Way driveway apron. In order to accommodate fuel t er trucks to service the gas station,this driveway is proposed to be 40 feet wide rather than 30 feet. Public right-of-way landscaping and onsite landscaping to be provided will exceed Ci y of Renton minimum requirements. The proposed Landscaping Plan indicates plantings over approximately 25 percent(29,603 sf) of the site. The proposal includes landscaping for wildlife, in accordance with the C4y's agreement with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service for all development in the Green River Valley. Plants suitable for wildlife habitat are proposed in an area approximately 6,590 sIr in size, along the northwest L-shaped border with a natural area ret a fined on adjacent commercial property. This area totals 5.5 percent of the Pierre Grady Way site, compared to the minimum 2 percent requirement. 1 Im lementation o the proposal will not obstruct views from existing structures. The Extended Stay of America (ESA) hotel adjacent to the northwest corner of the site is a 3 story structure, oriented in an east/west direction. No significant windows overlook the site t. the south. Vegetation retained in a natural area used by ESA for stormwater detention substa tially screens views between these two properties. An Eagle Hardware corporate office borde s the northeast corner of the Pierre Grady Way site. This structure is also three stories high, corn,ared to the lone-story car rental/sales office proposed on the Pierre Grady Way site. Th- car rental/sales office is proposed west of the Eagle Hardware corporate office, between the two offsite three-story buildings. 2 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oak-sdale Project Narrative: Revised 8 24/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW James and Barbara Lynn Pierre, owners of the Pierre Grady Way site @ Oakesdale A enue SW, request rezone of a 2.74-acre parcel from CO — Commercial Office, to IM—Medium Industrial, to permit site developrnient for a gas station with mini mart, and car rental/used car sales operation. Tenants with whom thy are negotiating for these uses include Chevron and Enterprise Rent—Car. The site is located on tile north side of SW Grady Way, between Oakesdale Avenue SW and P.well Avenue SW,in the Employment Area—Valley designation. Site Zoning and Com rehensive Plan History City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department staff researched the Pierre Grady Way site zoning and Comprehensive Plan history, and reporte4 this information to a representative of the applicant (see letter to Vicki Morris Consulting Se ices dated July 23, 1998; copy attached). Staff findings are reported below. Current zoning (I O — Commeecial Office) pre' ceded the last Comprehensive Plan amendment and implementing z.ning, and there is no evidence that reclassification to Medium Industrial (IM) zoning has been previously considered. 1985-1992. The Comprehensive Plan designation of the site during this period was Manufacturing Park/Mlultiple Option. This designation allowed industrial, service commerci 1 and office 4ses. Corresponding zoning in 1992 was Office Park on the northern parcel, and Manufacturing Park over the remainder of the site adjacent to the north side of SW Grady W y. 993. In 1993, the City of Renton issued an interim Comprehensive Plan as a firs step toward adopting Groi with Management Act (GMA) policies. At that time, the lan use designation Employment Area—Office was applied to the Pierre Grady Way site, with corresponding Commercial Office (CO) zoning (Ordinance 4404, June 1993). 1994. Puget Power, property owner prior to James and Barbara Lynn Pierre, reque ed a Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1994, to change the Employment Area—Office designati n to Employment Area—Co ercial, with corresponding Commercial Arterial (AC) zoning. This request was denied. 1995. The Cit 's final GMA Comprehensive Plan update was adopted in 1995. Th final plan maintained the E� ployment Area—Office designation for the property, with correspo ding Comme cial Office(CO)) zoning. 1996. A iCity-initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1996 revised the Pierre ady Way site land use designation to Employment Area—Valley. This was an area-wide amen ment affecting nearly all of Oe valley, for which the purpose was to allow a range of commercial, ffice and industrial zones. Commercial Office zoning was maintained on the Pierre Grady Way s to at the tim ' of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan amendment. Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Recent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes On January 24, 1997, James Pierre initiated a Medium Industrial (IM) Rezone an, Site Plan Approval application with the City of Renton by requesting a Preliminary Project Review Meeting. At that time, the site development proposal included a three-story office building en the southwest corner of the property, and a car rental agency in the northern portion. Rezone from Commercial Office (dO) to Medium Industrial (IM) was requested. The Memorandu . of comment prepared by the City of Renton Long Range Planning staff(February 11, 1997), l oted overall consistency between the proposal and the Comprehensive Plan. The only area of pot-ntial inconsistency was cited as the need to provide safe, convenient pedestrian access fro the sidewalk to the proposed office building—less a matter of Comprehensive Plan inconsistenc than a site pin review comment. James Pierre carefully considered the appropriate zone to request for the uses for whi h he had prospective tenants. Over the course of the year following the initial Preliminary P oject Review meeting, the rental car agency decided against a corporate office on the site, and . es Pierre initiated communications with a gas station/mini mart tenant for the southwest co er of the property. The ability to permit a gas station, mini mart, and car rental agency was exami ed in three zoQnes: Commercial Office (existing zoning); Arterial Commercial (CA); and M-dium Industrilal. Automobile rental/sales is a prohibited use in the CO (existing) zone. CA zonin= was geographically unavailable to site. The February 11, 1997 Long Range Planning Memo cited Comprehensive Plan Policy LY-212.14, ``Favorable consideration should be given to rezo es to Commercial Arterial(CA) only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd S eet, and/or lEast Valley load south of SW 27th Street." Therefore, IM zoning was selected. Automobile rental/leasng was a primary permitted use, and gasoline service stations w-re a secondary permitted use subject to Site Plan Approval. There was no mention of mini ma s in the IM zone text. In the Fall of 1997, discussions were initiated with City of Renton Long Range P1a 'ng staff to confirm the appropriate zone to request for the proposed gas station/mini mart an car rental/sales uses. We llearned that a Comprehensive Plan amendment was forthcoming to re ove the CA zone geograplic constraint north of I-405 in the Employment Area—Valley design tion, on the condition that rezone applications encompass a minimum of 5 acres. This zone re ains unavailable to the Pierre Grady Way site, which is only 2.74 acres in size. Staff interpre ation was requested concerning the absence of Land Use Code discussion of mini marts in the IM one. Staff acknowledged the new market trend to develop gas stations with an associated conve ence store, aid considered it a possible oversight or need for Code update. They were in the pr cess of assembling City-wide Land Use Code issues related to gas stations, vehicle service, acce sory uses, ariId screening re9uirements for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Co,ncil. The December 30, 19917 Commission briefing paper disclosed that this work program came bout in part as a result of inquiries from a property owner [James Pierre] interested in request ng a 2 8 14/98 Justific tion for Rezon Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale rezone from CO to IM to develop a gas station with mini mart and auto leasing business long Grady YVay. The applicant attended Planning Commission meetings in Spring 1998 to a swer questions and provide information. Land Use Code amendments effective April 15, 1998 re lted in the following changes in the zones of interest to the Pierre Grady Way site: NEW NEW USE CHANGED FR M ZONE PROHIBITED USE ALLOWANCE SECONDARY O PRIMARY US Commercial Arterial Gas stations Commercial Office Gas stations Medium Industrial Mini marts as primary Gas stations permitted use 'With the April 15, 1998 Land Use Code amendments, all three proposed uses o the Pierre Grady Way site pre primary permitted uses in the requested IM zone, and all are pro ' ited in the existing CO zon .. Given the sequence and content of City-wide Comprehensive Pla and Land Uise Code amendments that have.occurred between 1996 and the time of this applic tion, each of which has been supportive of the proposed uses in the requested IM zone at this loc tion, the cu dent application for rezone is timely. In further support of this request, properties easlt and west of the site on the north side of SW Grady Way are currently zoned IM, and a consid:rable amount of IM zoning extends northeastward from the site, above the intersection of P swell Avenue SW with SW Grady Way (see the G2 current zoning map that accompanies the Jul 23, 1998 City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department etter attached to this Justification for Rezone). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The City of Renton Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Preliminary Project R-view Memorandum concerning the current Pierre Grady Way Site Rezone request and Site Plan Approval application (April 14, 1998) reported "no inconsistencies with the Comprehe sive Plan," and found that `rThe proposed commercial uses fall within the range of uses indicat-d for the [Comprehensive Pllan] designation [Employment Area—Valley (EAV)]". The Memo lists specific Comprehensive Plan policies reviewed in relation to this proposal. These are cited b-low. Comme is that follow ke offered by the applicant. The analysis supports a determination that the propertir is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested, pursuant to policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and recent supportive Land Use Code amendments, described ab•ve. Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a ange and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. 3 8,'14/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses are not available in the nort 1 west quadrant of the city that includes the Pierre Grady Way site. Implementation of these uses will in• ease the range and variety of uses, and introduce services to motorists along the SW Grady Wa and Oakesdile Avenue SW arterial corridors. Policy 1U--212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximitty to one another. The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency will be compatible in ch. lacter (scale, appearance) and supportive in terms of services offered to existing land uses in the area. The gas station will be a complementary use to the onsite rental car agency. Both uses are likely to .erve the adjacent Extended Stay of America hotel, and the office and light industrial parks to the nort and northeast. Policy Lt U-212.8 Reco ize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoti the gradual transition of ides on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercia and office use. Good access and_high visibility are important attributes of the site for the proposed uses. The intensity of locating in such close proximity to heavily traveled arterials could be less desirab e for commercial office uses. Recent Land Use Code amendments support gas stations, mini marts . d car rental/sales agencies as rimary permitted uses in the City's industrial zones. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses hen reasonable buffering between the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodati•n of deliveries and loading t l industrial areas can be maintained The proposed site plan complies with all required setbacks, and includes providing pe ' eter landscape buffers. Na ral plantings for wildlife habitat are proposed in the northwest corner 4 f the site, adjacent to an area f natural vegetation retained on the Extended Stay of America hotel pro•erty. These features will m i stain a significant visual buffer between the gas station/mini mart and the otel. Fuel tanker truck access to the site is proposed from the westernmost driveway on SW Grady Wa, . Policy , Chan es in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to • ether LU:212.11 � g should be considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's eco 'omit base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficie cy in the use lof the land and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse l• • use impacts may be taken into account. Selecting tenants and developing a site plan in accordance with all applicable City of R-nton development standards Was a significant challenge for the Pierre Grady Way site, due to the n. ow 4 8 14/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale and irregular configuration of the property, required setbacks, existing utility easements and ove head powerlines. The site has remained vacant since annexation to the City of Renton in April 1959. here is no eYidence of historical development on the property other than a railroad embankmen and drainage channel — modified at the time of the 1997 grade and fill action, and electrical 8 ower transmision/distribution lines. The proposal constitutes an efficient use of the property, and will 'reate jobs and tax revenues for the City of Renton. The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rent. sales agency will increase the balance of uses in the vicinity, as described above following Policy LU-21►.1. Policy LU-212.12 F orable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar • i or compatible uses are already located in the area. Other auto-related uses exist to the east along the SW Grady Way corridor, and prop-rties adjacent to the site, along the north side of SW Grady Way, are currently zoned IM. Policy Li U-212.13 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones where there is an oppor nity to create improved efficiencies of use through the joint use/sharing of onsite facilities such asp• king, I. open spice and supporting services. See the discussion t at follows Policy LU-212.2, above. Policy LU-212.16 Favorable consideration may be given to rezones to industrial uses when a ix or wider range of uses is not yet appropriate for a site. See the discussion that follows Policy LU-212.8 and LU-212.11, above. PolicyLU-212.21 l>ehicular connections between adjacent parkingareas are encour• ed � J g Incentiv s should be offered to encourage shared parking. he proposed site plan includes vehicular connections between the onsite parking arras of the gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency, and the offsite parking area of the agle Hardware corporate office. A northeast access drive is proposed between the site and P swell Avenue SW, through the Eagle Hardware corporate office parking lot, in an existing 20-ft wide access easement executed December 20, 1985. Significant Material Change Grade and Fill Action. James and Barbara Lynn Pierre purchased the Grady W.y @ Oakesdale Avenue SW property from Puget Sound Energy Services in 1996. In 1997, they appli-d for and received a City of Renton Special Fill and Grade Permit (File LUA-97-046, SP) and .ding License (No. 970552) to place approximately 15,000 cy of fill on the property to bring it up to ti ade with adjacent streets. The permit application and SEPA Checklist that accompanied the appli ation • 5 8 14/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale disclosed the likely development proposal for the site, as described in paragraph one of the 'I,cent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes section of this Justification for Rezone. Bas-. on communications with and permissions received from the City to-date, which have all been supp rtive of the project,the owners incurred the expense to proceed with the fill and grade action. Storm Drainagg Modifications. The 1997 fill and grade action included leveling the former railroad embankment through the northern parcel, and installing a subsurface drainage coll:ction system (twin 48-inch cu verts) where an open drainage channel had previously bisected the site. This action vas closely coordinated with the City of Renton, which owns the drainage easement, an. with the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. Approximately 100 feet at the west end of the drainage channel was left open, with.a vegetated bottom and side slopes, for water q ality enhancement prior to stormwater discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. Transportation System Improvements. Oakesdale Avenue SW currently to ates approximately one block south of SW Grady Way. During 1998, the City of Renton oegan constructing a southward extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW to SW 27th Street. It is expecte.� that this construction will be complete by November 1998. The second phase of this roadway proj-ct is scheduled to complete Oakesdale Avenue SW as a through-route to SW 29th Street in 999. Oakesdle Avenue SW''s expected to receive considerable use as an alternate route to the I-40 /SR- 167 intefchange. The services proposed for the Pierre Grady Way site—gas station, mini mart, . d car rental/sales agency — are not currently available in the northwest quadrant of the City, and ' be conveniently accessible to motorists in the SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW erial corridors. Public Health, Safety&Welfare Neither the rezone action nor development and operation of the proposed use are expected to adversely impact conditions of public health, safety or welfare in the site vi inity. While the operation oI a gas station will have more associated risk of fire or explosion tha the vacant site, there are numerous Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable regulations with which tie owner/operator will comply to minimize these risks. There are no sensitive conti_ ous land uses (such as a public school, day care center, medical facility, residence, etc.). At the time of this application, the owner was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound E ergy Services to place some powerlines underground and relocate others. The proposal being nego iated will result in burying the east-west powerlines from the east end of the open drainage channel to P swell Avenue SW, and relocating the north-south powerlines offsite to the west. These actio s, if implemented by Puget Sound Energy at the owners' expense,will improve onsite conditions of s. ety. 6 8 14/98 j.RITTE .N.. APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF REN1ON APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RaTON CITY.COUNCIL. FILENO. LUA-98-126, SA-H,R C 3 01998 APPLICATION NAME: Pierre, Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale RECEIVED. OITY.CLERK'S OFFICE e undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use H-aring.Examine li,dated November 19 19 98 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: James and Barbara Pierre Nye: Vicki Morris Address: 9419 Crystal Lake Road Address: Vicki Morris Consulting Services Woodinville, WA 98072 7732 18th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98115-4426 Telephone No. (206) 364-2200 Telephone No. (206) 522-8057 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: CONCLUSION: JJ : (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 2 Error. ��Appearance that applicant is looking for an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier requests to extend the Auto Mall Improvement district to include this site were rejected. Correction: The Auto Mall designation was never requested for this site. Communi- caltions with staff since 1996 concerning the appropriate zone to request for the site have consistently pointed to IM. See ,VMCS letter 11/30/98 and attachments. CONCLUSIOIITS: No. 4 Error: "If IM zoning is approved, there is nothing that requires the uses proposed by the applicant. The gasoline and rental car aspect could be abandoned. ' Many plans . . . submitted, reviewed and approved are abandoned on a regular basis." Correction: Mr. Pierre is not requesting a speculative rezone. Considerable invest- ments have been made to prepare permit-application-level drawings to expedite implementation of the proposal. An unreasonable generalization is applied in OTHER: DECISION Conclusion #4. No. 2 Error: "The City shall have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary, including both the driveway along Grady and the easement driveway/access in the northeast corner of the subject site." Correction: The City shall "coordinate and confirm acceptance of access o and ' from the site, as necessary to serve proposed uses" . . See DykemanArchitects letter 12/01/98.. 3 SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: • (Attach expl tion,if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: IM rezone , X Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Coordinate/confirm access to/ "the- site ' Remand.to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: 1 Other . --Pala, !% /34, December 30, 1998* Ippellant/Representative Signature --- Date % Note: First "appealed" by correspondence dated 11/30/98 and 12/01/98 referred to above. N TE: Please refer to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. he ppeal.doc " City of Rerifon+City Code 1 I;:: Title IV-Building ' Chapter 8 - Tearing - g Examiner Section 16 -Appeal'- ' --., , . . 7f1 � ' it{t 4-8-16: APPEAL: .._. ..._.._ . .- _.. - . Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written;decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within decision (14)calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) A. The written notice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile filing of a notice of appeal is authorized pursuant to the conditions detailed in Renton City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92). B. Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. C. Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written • decision-or recommendation,findings-and conclusions.contained-in.the Examiner's report,the-notice of appeal,and additional letters submitted by the parties.-(Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is e by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could"not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council may remand the matter to a Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony,it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council,and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-93) E. The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions Lb),parties. .. L - F. If,upon appeal of a decision of the!Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10A and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration,or modify,or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. G. If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examinerupon an application-submitted pursuant to Section-4-8-10B or C,and after examination of the record,the Council determines-that a substantial errorin fact or-law exists in the record,or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the..__... proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration,or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-8-10B or C. H. In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) - , heappeal.doc VICKI , "" = MORRIS „,; � ':: CITY OF R •. NTON y� .aa, CONSULTING j�..:-:�„ 'o£,tea; "��r�i�yi� t ;"f-% SERVICES DEC 3 1998 f Ti7F1a a'b'.aas �J2 Vx. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE CITY CLERK ED �•�' P. OFFICE ice" �'c ��•M, PROPOSAL PREPARATION '7!r ,;•- •,.•%"4� ' 1'0,,, PERMI" ASSISTANCE Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk December 30, 19,8 City of Menton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale, File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R Dear Ms. Peterson: Enclosed is the written appeal form and appeal fee ($75.00) for the Pierre Grady Way s to at Oakesdale Avenue SW. This letter is to confirm that in several conversations I have had wit you since December 8, 1998, you have advised that my original correspondence (dated Novemb:r 30, 1998), and that of Dykeman Architects (dated December 1, 1998), objecting to the Haring Examiner's rezone recommendation and conditions of Site Plan Approval, were recognized as an "appeal' in this case. We had been advised by staff that a formal appeal of a Hearing Exa 'ner recommendation was not necessary, since it was not a decision. However, you confirme. that current City procedure (under consideration for revision) does require a formal a',peal. Therefore, even though the date on the enclosed written appeal is December 30, 1998, the .ction was initiated within the statutory 14-day appeal period which commenced on November 19, 998. I confirmed in telephone conversation with you yesterday that you have both of the 1-tters referred to above, and attachments, and will copy these to accompany the written appeal o be provided to City Council members. If you find that you do require any of these docu ents, please contact me and I will be happy to provide them. It is my understandin of City procedure (based on conversations with you) that Mr. Pierr- and project representatives do not need to be present at the January 4th City Council hearing at hich this case will be listed on a "Consent Agenda" for referral to the Planning & Develo iment Committee. We understand that you will send written notification of the date on which w- will have the opportunity to discuss the matter with the Planning&Development Committee. Thank you for your assistance with sending forms and helping us to understand City procedu es in this matter. Sincerely, Vicki Morris 7732 18TH AVENUE NORTHEAST • SEATTLE,WA 98115-4426 • FAX: (206) 523-4648 • PHONE: (206) 5.2-8057 Another r -Guaranteed i 'Delivery ; 'by; `� i� .. .. _ 1; , ' 'fir ,s- �'-� --I` -:,---. e z g?E #1..6 MESSENGER 72g, 7700 4 :%F i 1 SERVIGE-` . - . �;FR®M Vit nIVI5= aX . j Viiici T® 0-f i t !Del Nji Deadline jC� ;ik1,-1 fd?� �f,4 .-VICKI MORRIS r '"z CONSULTING i '-, 3 SERVICES -- 7732 18TH AVE.N.E. I G ";e, " SEATTLE,WA 98115-4426 1 City of Renton j City Clerk, 7th Floor 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 (425) 430-6502 I I • NOTES RECEIPT DATE JOa/9r p. 2327. �/tckr ly(orris C Su l r) Svcs 6�tl l ca.. RECEIVED FROM Y y ADDRESS J 0 $ a 4 FOR cypiit-t Re, ITe- o• ba „ - �-/Z ‘j ct- 0 ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMT.OF CASH ACCOUNT V PT. PAID CHECK -7 5 00 BALANCE HONEY BV L-41-4 -' DUE ORDER ©1998 REM FORM®8L802 I ) -CITY CLERK'Sff OFFICE 4 Send Copies to: I ' CITY ATTORNEY I CITY COUNCIL(Aeav 4,41 al�Fi1 I I FINANCE/INFO SERVICES I FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTION CluA-cp- ' � - 1 HEARING EXAMINER HOUSING&HUMAN SERVICES MAYOR/EXECUTIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT. ;. q PLANNING COMMISSION k J4.449 GUl A t) POLICE NEWSPAPER CODIFIER f g PARTIES OF RECORD I ' PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS 1 1-0 10 I' ADMINISTRATION cre99 Zira i�e�'p aA r a i n AIRPORT g- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ` im aM ►� o Building/Zoning/Plan Review Y y M®���� n� ! f I PLANNING&TECHNICAL SVCS. d 611' 1/Thet I Property Management ® I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS S61n`et aTraffic Engineering IDI UTILITY SYSTEMS r7y CbNSP Sue Cei KH 'NNW I 13 0 a 0 1 1 1 i 1 4PpVAT 1 )/1n/oQ ! 1' CIT 3F REN ON tb "LL 1 City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor' Marilyn J.Petersen December 18, 1998 Ms.Vicki Morris Vicki Morris Consulting Services 7732 18th Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98115-4426 • Re" Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale; File No. R, SA-98-126 Dear Ms Morris: As we discussed by telephone earlier'this.week,the appeal process specified in the , • Renton'City Code currently requires that all appeals of hearing examiner decisions and/or recommendations filed with the City Council be accompanied by an appeal form-and a . $75 00 fee.-Although the hearing examiner appeal process is currently under review by the[City Council and the City Attorney,,your objection letter falls within the legal. parameters currently reflected in'the City,Code arid represents an appeal. Enclosed are copies of the required appeal form: Please returdthe form accompanied b a$75.00 fee and your appeal will be processed in a timely manner.` If you have questio i s or require further information,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn . P rsen City Clerk cc:l Jana Huerter,Development Services Division • 'Fred J. Kaufman,Hearing Examen Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • 105,5 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer c °5 CIT` .3F RENTON —.El Cityl Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen • December 18, 1998 Michael L. Barthol, AIA Dykeman Architects 1716 W. Marine View Drive, 2nd floor Everett, WA 9820 -2098 Re: ; Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale; File No. R, SA-98-126 Dear Mr. Barthol: The,appeal process'specified in the Renton City Code currently requires that all appeals of hearing examiner decisions and/or recommendations filed with the City Council be accompanied by an appeal form and a$75.00 fee Although the hearing examiner appea : process is currentlyl under review by the City Council and the City Attorney,your objection letter falls within the legal parameters currently:;reflected in the City Code and represents an appeal. - ;,,- _ • . Enclosed are copies of the required appeal`form -Please return the form accompanied by a$75.00 fee and your appeal will be processed in a timely manner. If you have question. or require further information,please feef free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn J. e sen City Clerk cc: ;Jana Huerter,Development Services Division . 'Lawrence J. Kaufm�{n,Hearing Examin Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-65 6 •• This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer - • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 17, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Way Site Rezone(CO to IM) Legal description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have i eviewed the above referenced legal descriptions for a rezone and find the legals to be satisfactory. cc:Marilyn Messes \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\U:\SFESSER\pierrerz.DOC • x.. • CITI IF RENTON ...LL . City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen • December 18, 1998 Ms.,Vicki Morris Vicki Morris Cons lting Services 7732 18th Avenue Seattle, WA 98115-4426 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale; File No. R, SA-98-126 • Dear Ms Morris: As we discussed b telephone earlier this week, the appeal process specified in the Renton City Code currently requires that all appeals of hearing examiner decisions and/ r recommendations filed with the City Council be accompanied by an appeal form and a $75.00 fee. Although the hearing'examiner appeal process is currently under review by the City Council and the City Attorney,,your objection letter falls within the legal . • parameters currently reflected in The City,Code-and`represents an appeal. Enclosed are copies of the required appeal form. Please return the form accompanied b a$75.00 fee and your appeal will be processed in a timely manner. If you have questions or require further information,please feel free to call.: , Sincerely, Marilyn . P rsen City Clerk cc: 'Jana Huerter,Development Services Division )' iea gau +HHesann"g Examiii ;Lawrence J. Wfarren, City Attorney • 1055 South Grady Way.- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer tilt„ CITN .)F RENT N City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen December 18, 1998 Michael L. Barthol, AIA D keman Architects 1716 W. Marine View Drive, 2nd floor Everett, WA 98201-2098 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale; File No. R, SA-98-126 Dear Mr. Barthol: The;appeal process specified in the Renton City Code currently requires that all appeals of hearing examiner decisions and/or recommendations filed with the City Council be accorripanied by appeal form and a`$75.00 fee. .Although the hearing examiner appeal . process is currentl under review by the City Council and the City Attorney,your objection letter fall within the legal parameters currently,reflected in the City Code and : represents an appeal, 1 • Enclosed are copies of the required appeal form. Please return the form accompanied by a$75.00 fee and your appeal will be processed in a timely manner. If you have questions or require further information, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn J. e seri City Clerk cc: Jana Huerter,Development Services Division yredJ`Kaufriian�Hearing Examri 1 :Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains-50%recycled material,20%post consumer AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, depo.es and states: That on the 19th day of November ,1998, affiant deposited in the mail of th United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: " -2, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / l /I day of , 1998. V41, Notary Public irtthe State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Pierre Grady Way Site LUA98-126,SA-H,R The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. • • • • ... '+. ,•. _ - ass' 5: -.. - a . • • • • Cill • • • • • • 4 i f November 1 , 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT,RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION APPLICANT: James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R LOCATION: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave SW and Powell Ave SW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct a gas station, convenience store and a car rental/sales office. The proposal includes a request to r-zone the site from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Indu.trial (IM). SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve wit conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 28, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, ex. o ining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the November 3, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing,opened on Tuesday,November 3, 1998, at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Elevation d4awings-mini-mart Exhibit No. 6: Elevation drawing- auto rents /sales office Exhibit No.'7: Customer parking map James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site , File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 2 I The hearing'lopened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Develo•ment Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant requests site •lan approval and rezone. The site plan approval is to construct a gas station, convenience store and car rent 1/sales office. The rezone is to rezone the site from the existing Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industria (IM). Gas stations'and auto rental sales uses are not permitted under the current CO zoning;therefore,the app icant requires approval of the rezo a to establish the proposed uses on the site. The gas station/convenience s ore would consist of a 1,300 squ re foot building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 square foot canopy and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground storage tanks. The gas station is located at the very southwest corner of the site,oriented to the intersection of SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The car rental/sales office is located in the north central part of the site. There are several transmission lines that cross the site and therefore restrict the building locations. The building pad for the rental/sales office is approximately 10,000 square feet. The applicant plans on initial construction of a 5,250 square foot off ce. The expansion area would p iovide for parking until the future expansion occurs. There are approximately 168 parking spaces indicated, in Iluding 90 auto display parking places oriented toward SW Grady Way, an. 10 parking spaces for the convenience store. No on-site maintenance of the vehicles is proposed. Vehicle washing is proposed and tha would be enclosed at the rear of the structure and equipped with a drainag- collection system. This site is outside the Auto Mall area as well as the expanded Auto Mall designatio . There will be four points of ccess,two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Avenue and a fourth that exits at the northeast corner of the site through the driveway of the adjacent property. The site is prese tly' undeveloped. The Examiner approved a special fill and grade permit in 1997 and approximately 18,000 cubic yards of fill was placed to create a level site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated . d the mitigation measures applied were fire and traffic mitigation fees. There is a natural landscape requirement and it is being provided in the L-shaped area at the northwest c•rner of the site. That is in additions to storm water landscaping contiguous to the area near the adjacent hotel, and the required perimeter landscaping. The project meets the setback requirements. There are adequate utiliti-s and roads available to serve the proposed development. This site is within the Employment Area Valley designation of the Comprehensive Plan(CP). Commer ial office and industrial zoning is consistent with that designation. There was a CP amendment adopted thi year which basically says that rezoning to CA should be only on sites that are five acres or more. Because t is site is less than that applicant is Proposing a commercial use and rezone to industrial designation. The rang; of uses allowed in the IM zone was listed. In response to questioning by the Examiner,Mr.Rosen stated hat the industrial uses contiguous to the site made it consistent with existing land use designations,rather than . Commercial Arterial designation. 1 Part of the rezone criteria is hat the site was not considered specifically at the time of the last area land se analysis and zoning. The subject site was designated Employment Area Office with a corresponding Commercial Office zoning in 1993. There is no background that IM was considered for the property with the adoption of the City-wide zoning. In 1996 the City initiated a CP amendment and revised the designati n of this site to Employment Area Valley. The purpose of that amendment was to allow a wider range of commercial',office and industrial uses. Further objectives and policies of the CP were listed which staff felt were appropriate for the rez Ine, including constraints of the site as well as access and visibility. The pr posed James Pierre, Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H;R November 19, 1998 Page 3 gas station/convenience store, car rental/sales are not currently available in the northwest quadrant of the City, and would provide a convenient service to motorists. Staff recommends approval of both the rezone and the site plan with the following conditions of the site plan approval: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures; (2)that the site plan approval be contingent upon approval of the rezone from CO to IM. Vicky Morris, 7732 18th Av nue NE, Seattle, Washington 98115,applicant representative herein,responded to questions by the Examiner regarding the auto mall designation in this area. After meeting with City officials, she was informed that the subject site was excluded from auto mall designation because of its existing C,O zoning, and that all properties in the auto mall designation were zoned either CA,IM or CO. Michael Barthol, 1716 West 1Marine View Drive,Everett,Washington 98203, applicant architect herein, clarified portions of the staff report regarding parking counts and the building areas proposed. Sheryl Girard,4032 148th Ai enue NE,Redmond,Washington 98052, applicant representative herein, explained that a large volume of wash water was not anticipated and a recycling system would not necessarily be installed. Second, provision has been made for potential spill containment by collecting all surface runoff from the fuel station and wash water areas, placing them through oil-water separation and discharging directly to the sanitary sewer system t Applicant is also providing additional water quality with swales planted around the perimeter of the site within the landscape areas. Don Moody, 16443 SE 35th,l,Bellevue, Washington 98008, applicant representative herein, explained that access through the adjacent Eagle site occurred when Puget Power purchased a piece of property that segmented off and was negoi iated between those two parties to fit the existing parking access area. Michael Birdsall, 25713 SE 164th Street,Issaquah,Washington 98027,traffic consultant for applicant herein, stated that they are not in agreement with some of the City's assumptions regarding traffic. They are pursuing an administrative decision and anticipate a revision downward in the present calculations. Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055,!stated that the access through the ajdacent Eagle site would probably not be used as a through-way because of its location. He further clarified that secondary containment is required for gasoline tanks in all areas,not just in the aquifer protection zone. James P.Pierre, 941 Crystal,Lake Place,Woodinville,Washington 98072, owner/applicant herein, stated that if this project is approved the person who would be involved with the Chevron station has operated five such stations. The other owner isi Enterprise Rent A Car and they are known for their quality and should be a good neighbor. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to spgak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 a.m. 1 James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA- i,R November 19, 1998 Page 4 FINDINGS;CONCLUSIONS,RECOMMENDATION&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants,James P. and Barbara Lynn Pierre, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of property from CO(Commercial Office)to IM(Medium Industrial)together with a site plan for mixed use development. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent r1iaterials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental J eview Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The:subject site is located along the north side of SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW on the west and Powell venue SW on the east. 6. The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel somewhat like an inverted T-shaped parcel. It has approximately 720'feet of frontage along Grady Way,which forms its southern boundary. It is approximately 80 feet deep at its east boundary. It widens to approximately 240 feet in the cent r and then narrows to approximately 160 feet at its west boundary. The subject site is approximately .74 acres or 119,354 square feet in area. 7. The subject site is zoned CO(Commercial Office), a classification established in June 1993 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404. 8. The'site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April 1959. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such develo ment without consideratio of other policies of the Plan. I 10. The area is developed with a variety of uses including automobile sales, office and commercial i ses and some industrial uses. 11. The,site is currently vacant and was filled within the last year after receiving a special permit for fill and Egrade(File No.LUA97-046,SP). The permit allowed the filling and culverting of a drainae ditch that crossed the property. The west end of this system was left open. A power line transmissio? corridor runs east to west across the site and a distribution line runs north to south from the main line. While the applicant is hoping to relocate some of these lines,that has not occurred at this time. 12. The,applicant propo es developing a multiple use site that includes a gasoline station, convenience store and a car sales and rental office together with display and customer parking areas. James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 5 13. The convenience store would be located on the corner of the site immediately northeast of the Oakesdale and Grady Way intersection. The gasoline pumps would be located immediately eas of the convenience store. This gasoline/convenience complex would include a 1,300 square foot building and four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 square foot canopy. Two 20,000 gallon underground fu 1 tanks would hold the gaso me product. The system would be guarded by a secondary containment sy tem. The'building would e a one-story convenience store. It would be pentagon shaped with one an le aimed out toward the intersection. 14. The,second aspect of the proposal would be the automobile sales and rental complex located ea t and north of the gasoline component. The building is located in the north central portion of the site, in the wider,northern dogleg. This would entail a two-phased proposal for the office building and gar ge. The garage would be used for washing vehicles but maintenance would not be done onsite. Init ally, the applicant will develop a 5,250 square foot, one-story office/garage on a 10,000_square foot b ilding pad., The building pad would accommodate an additional, approximately 5,000 square foot add' ion, potentially doubling in size the office component. The building will have a gently peaked roof nd dormer entry. 15. While the staff repo It indicated that there would be 174 parking stalls located on the site,the ap licant indicated that there would be 168 stalls. If the second phase building were developed,this num er would be reduced to 146 stalls. Ten stalls would be associated with the gas station and conveni nce store. The remaining stalls would serve the automobile businesses. The stalls would be concen rated along the Grady Way frontage to increase exposure of the rental and sale automobiles. Other st lls would be located around the office building. Staffs analysis attempted to divide parking by use and determined that if the expansion occurs, some parking dedicated to automobile display would h.ve to be provided for customer parking and not permanently occupied by rental or sales cars. 16. The applicant proposed four driveways for access to and from the site. Two driveways would b- located along Grady Way. There would be one driveway along Oakesdale approximately 120 f-et north of Grady. Staff has indicated that this driveway may need to be limited in the future to as ure safe;maneuvering into and out of the complex and safe functioning of the intersection. A fourth driveway would acts ally provide access to the site from the adjacent Eagle corporate office buil.ing located north of the site. An easement would permit access across the separately owned parcel o this site.' 17. The proposal would generate approximately 250 daily trips for the gasoline station, approximat-ly 76 trips per day for car 'rental agency and another approximately 62 trips per day for the used car lob . Miscellaneous trips'Were calculated for proposed expansions. The applicant raised some conce n about the trip generation fee but those were imposed as part of ERC review and were not challenged. 18. The proposed IM zo a requires 20 foot setbacks along the arterial streets of Grady and Oakesda e. The convenience store is set back 20 feet. The office is set back over 100 feet. In addition,the IM one requires a landscape strip along those same arterials of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichev-r is less: The applicant will be providing the 20 feet along Oakesdale which will be coupled with th- 2% Soil'Conservation Service natural landscaping in the northwest corner of the site. The applican will be providing a variable landscaping strip along Grady that varies with the lot depth as measured from Grady. The landscaping varies from about 10 feet deep to 13 feet to portions 20 feet deep. The e will also,be landscaping around the rest of the perimeter of the lot and accent plantings will be locat;d around the buildings. James Pierre - Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 6 19. Detention is not required on this site but water treatment will be required to maintain the quali of any water directed into the storm drainage system since it ultimately enters the P-1 Channel system. Water quality swales will be located along the Grady frontage in general. Contaminated water from asphalt surfaces will be directed to oil/water separator and discharged to the sanitary sewer system and not the storm system. The volume of car wash water is not considered large and directed to the sanitary sewer and will not be recycled as it is in commercial carwash facilities. The gasoline distribution systems will use secondary containment. 20. A hotel is located north of the western half of the subject site. An office complex with which it will share an access driveway is located north of the eastern half of the site. Offices are located south of the site. The Metro plant is located northwest of the site across Oakesdale. 21. The property immediately north of the subject site is zoned CO as is all of the property along the east side of Oakesdale north to South 7th Street and north of there. The property directly south across Grady is also zoned CO. The parcel east of the site is zoned IM,the category requested by the applicant. A parcel southeast of the subject site south of Grady is also zoned IM. 22. The following is a short list of some of the range of uses permitted in the IM Zone: a. Conl truction office and material and equipment storage. b. Lumber, coal and fuel yards. c. Bulk retail and wholesale outlets. d. Automobile and truck(commercial and non-commercial) sales,rentals and repair establishments and body shops. e. Mobile home,trailer and recreational vehicle sales,rental and repair establishments. CONCLUSIONS: Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest,that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-81 14,which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is not justified and should not be approved by the City Council. Since an entire Site Plan was'1predicated on the approval of a reclassification of the subject site,this office will provide an alternative recommendation in the event the City Council approves the reclassification of the subject site to IM as proposed by the applicant. 2. This case is not easy. It would appear that the applicant is looking for an ad hoc reclassification of the subject site after earlier requests to extend the Auto Mall Improvement district to include this site were James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 I Page 7 rejected. While there is some support in the Comprehensive Plan policies to recommend reclassification,those policies just as well recommend any commercial classification including the Commercial Office(CO)the site is currently zoned. The Comprehensive Plan's designation of Employment Area Valley does not necessarily favor an industrial designation any more than it favors the current CO zoning. CO allows a wide range of commercial uses which would generate additional jobs without introducing possibly deleterious industrial uses. 3. This office will recommend that the City Council not reclassify the subject site. It appears that the City Council specifically amended the Auto Mall provisions of the Code and those changes included the general boundaries of the areas so designated. This site was omitted from those changes. It may be that the City preferred realizing some of its other goals of the Comprehensive Plan which is to provide for a diversified economic base including,therefore,businesses not engaged in automotive sale and services. This is an admitted prime location of the City. The City located a gateway sign in this area and it may prefer an interesting office building to additional automotive services. Is a gasoline tation and convenience store allied with a car rental and sales operation appropriate for this site? Clearly,that is fairly debatable. 4. While the applicant' proposal does not include industrial uses,the range of uses that could be permitted on the site if it is reclassified to IM is wide and not all of them necessarily appropriate for a gateway entrance to ithe City. If IM zoning is approved,there is nothing that requires the uses proposed by the applicant. The gasoline and rental car aspect could be abandoned. Within the last year another proponent proposed reclassifying a site just south of I-405 from IM to CO to construct a motel/hotel. Those plans were stopped and now that applicant prefers the original IM. The Seattle Times still has not developed its elaborate proposal for the Valley. Many plans that have been submitted,reviewed and approved are abandoned on a regular basis. So the question before reclassifying this site is to ask if the range of uses that are permitted in the IM zone would be appropriate for this gateway site, adjacent to a residential hotel. The IM zone would permit: construction offices and material and equipment storage; lumber, coal and fuel yards; bulk retail and wholesale outlets; and automobile and truck (commercial and non-commercial)sales,rentals as well as repair establishments and body shop . In addition, it looks as if the IM zoning is somewhat disparate from the adjacent properties in general. Most of Oakesdale's east frontage is zoned for Commercial Office uses befitting the quality and image the City has attempted to achieve for this new,well landscaped boulevard type of street. 5. Supporting the proposal are the fact that the Comprehensive Plan would also call for some diversity of zoning types which might favor the proposed zoning. But, again,the proposed ad hoc expansion of the automall will not really introduce any additional economic diversity. Much of Grady Way is already dedicated to automotive sales and service and adding an additional use is not improving the economic diversity of the area) The other aspect of the site which could favor rezoning the site are some development constraints on the subject site. Due to the various powerlines,the large expanse of parking proposed by the applicant would be accommodated in the IM Zone. 6. Clearly,the City Council will ultimately decide the issue. The recommendation provides them with a slightly different point of view and different references. If they choose to reclassify the subject site to IM,then the applicant should be provided with an appropriate review of the proposed site plan. Site Plan 7. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 19, 1998 Page 8 a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The'proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 8. The'proposed use is a mixed commercial venture which is compatible with the Comprehensive "lan's designation of Employment Area Valley for the subject site. In addition, it provides a reasonable landscape transition with the hotel site to the north. 9. Building Code issues will be resolved when a permit is applied for. If the City Council rezones the subject site,the propiosed use would be compatible with the IM zoning proposed by the applica fit. 10. The;low-rise buildings should not have any adverse impacts on adjacent property or the general ublic. The;site is well landscaped from both the public spaces along the adjacent streets and from the ses north of the site. It appears to have made reasonable use of a site and worked around the power ine corridors. Value judgments could be made about developing this prime gateway site with a gas line station and convenience store as the focus at the intersection,but the use would be permitted if t e site is appropriately rezoned. 11. The'site will generate additional traffic but it appears that the surrounding street system has reas nable capacity to handle tl+additional traffic. The driveway proposed for Oakesdale could create to ing or maneuvering problems for left turns if traffic on that roadway increases. The City,therefore, sh 11 have the absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary. Similarly, at the urrent time staff did not see any problems with creating an easement driveway from the subject site th Lough the parcel to the north for access to Powell Avenue. If any problems arise from this access, staff shall have the discretion t o bar the through access using this easement. 12. The;development of the site with the uses proposed should not adversely affect neighboring property values. Clearly,thee will be additional traffic and probably 24 hour per day traffic frequenting the gasoline station and convenience store. Hopefully,this noise will not spill over to the hotel coniplex north of the site. 13. It appears that the driving aisles and driveways provide for safe circulation within the site. Acc-ss for pedestrians is provi ied by connections to the nearby sidewalks. 14. The buildings and pump canopy are widely spaced on the site and should not interfere with ligh and air to the site or surrounding uses. James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA- ,R - November 19, 1998 Page 9 15. . It appears that adequate public utilities are available to serve the subject site. 16. In conclusion,the proposed Site Plan makes reasonable use of the oddly shaped site. RECOMMENDATION: The city Council should deny the reclassification of the subject site from CO to IM. DECISION: If the City Council approves the reclassification of the subject site the Site Plan is approved sub,ect to the following condit ons: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The',City shall have absolute discretion to modify the access to and from the site as necessary in luding both the driveway aong Grady and the easement driveway/access in the northeast corner of the .ubject site. ORDERED THIS 19th day of November, 1998. FRED J.KA c&MAN HEARING EMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of November, 1998 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Vicky Morris Mike Barthol 1055 S Grady Way 7732 18th Avenue NE 1716 W.Marine View Driv- Renton, WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98115 Everett,WA 98203 Sheryl Girard Don Moody Michael Birdsall 4032 148th Avenue NE 16443 SE 35th 25713 SE 164th Redmond, WA 98052 Bellevue,WA 98008 Issaquah, WA 98027 Neil Watts James Pierre 1055 S Grady Way 941 Crystal Lake Place Renton,WA 98055 Woodinville,WA 98072 I James Pierre Pierre Grady Way Site File No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R November 1;9, 1998 Page 10 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1998 to the following: il Mayor Jesse;Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J.[Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson;Econ.Dev. Administrator South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be flu:d in writing on or before 5:00 pi m.,December 3, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is;ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,to a further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such a peal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requireme ts. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor o City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenan s,the executed Covenants will bel required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the fi e. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. I The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications m y occur concerning pending la 4 d use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land se process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication perm ts all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not onl, to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. F2 . 13T23N R4E E1/2 4cuMu18 7th St: - . I . I --- -- -=- '1 M � - IM 2 i11M , \ Ta> — —_-- . • ,, a 1 gI 1( \In r--- -- , \‘;\ 4 1 S 1th Mf fill:fill __,---\ rill - '' . 0 F-I M -I � a I I-405: \ \___„----r-.-7-7.7- 777, I , . z ' i I M \ ' 1 SW1 16th :St: i SW. tt 1/4 I •: . t .. , Q c. b I . x I ) I i CI; 1 i I I � 1 1 1 H2 • 25 T23N R4E E 1/2 s , 4 0 • 1. ZONING �''�" GZ. c p'B'� °"''�"m 24 T23N R4E Ell 1/2 ANTo 01/16/98 1 • nc W• A 'I i i LR�'y Ji ;� �-• I� y Lira. L S,. I N G. !i► T L_N 1 I. r '! ) o --- --- 111 '1 i - ; - -- j, I = r • 0 a. • 7N II 4 ��;" cy I 2 - • 3 --}- LC I o I E C. .H N ' it - 1' .1 I . 933 N L 1 _ Q Y G Ib I CD ` S.P.016-DB `.. .. �! • �1 . Z I . \ - SI.f�I II ... • i,»4 - 4e t F -- Q �-- ie to ; .I — . a . Z I I i;f W 'J Q O / 1 m COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I O X O I'— �. •, C E f� �' Ili I E R • a z :L1 , 13/I Ict �I e .• ail I • w . avatr r. 4Jr2 r i IP 4�'S 1087 SEWAGE •7 EAGLE HARDWARE n.,+ (' TREATMENT V_ ! - • EXTENDED STAY OF I I CORPORATE OFFICES "• H $ `yr PLANT 1 1'` ii•1 1 AMERICA HOTEL .3 II ' 1 n .1• W for `Ir • 1 I. \' 1. I;1 d: 6,ti' • - S. cL 9 se 136'8I 1 •^\ I t -.r J _ —i VACANT .1:to �i6 - • Y.,,9 ::r 1 a.1 .-r; t 3 12: . V, PROJECT SITE //ilk 1 y 0 1 ' SI I g w 1oe'sac • ,; i 0l�� G& 0 - - � j13 n I� .2223 t • Ip3 D1 3t u1S16 11 ��i"��s - •13 I2 1- _ 56 -� _ L1141 Ili ' 14111161 ..,—j 112I33 1,4,. ,., -,,,,..1. r slvf15s% �;,;: , [tal' L i- ti~j' 4e'a9 s I i 1 1 --.1 �p.,_10K "' Li'tc 2 A£'_1 1=-��OIL 42 TSI`��47� I ! I.I_� , s f 3 .. I PARK e�' - - J 31>d ( CITY UNIVERSITY 1r 6 5 4 � Y . I IF G..i x 133 34 3136 � y r v n 7 i ID 11 ` 1 f`SS po 319'130T31132 v.•r [11 3 2 'f E IJr• ' R23241 S tt." .Ov , , - N; I n� 7 . 4 I.3o 16 II r I 11 '= q13 1 ,9 b��l -154 S61 _;114'"I lows T i • I : ' UNDERPASS >I 'r r-2 le {d II 16'S •' It 11 t': ul So 51 St 57 54$ Y ^ .:1.. t a .1t 26 tS 2.6 3 2 - , • I n64 Ipi:'ti III , .... 7 7 -�NrE. .Ft$TA1 � ^ ;i:;,+�:+."`."�++.+�— ,- • ..,M,Ie, ecess t 6 $�?s I t/!_1-15 1' �,., too 11 C SeR ,i1 i 3r 'I v ��37 — • ,;; o re.4 L �1 i 2i1; I Uq_ 11" a 33 1. . t,16 36 ;,::�• .,, •, L.6:\e . ''. 1,1 • 1tl'`j•9 6 s 3?,ice•j $_ e .14:• 2t--1 •n 3s • I • is 4e J"r alb 1 •I�3 $ 1� 111i-.s_ 2 i 3'�, � ..}..•.+S(_ • N A 157 ac. ap! ? emu_— F �- t Ib I t--=l uj • Qt i 9: t'x i.41H 1 - ao 14 IS 16 Il 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 2SIt •111 16 19 21I23 24 2S 26 21 26 291 r20 21 22 2324 2S 6=9 30131 Ie, I et s6 ,so t6 3a , 6 \l• ul La ` 16TH sT .2 _ - _ S•II• C. ���n �r _ 1� d.17.,•1•I•i•'•i•,•I:� �i•i'i'i'i�i'I•�:1•�`; �1�I.1 � I., ��ri i IIPIR, G .III 'll t4 1 I I I I I re sI 1 1 I I I I 1� I, I - ar 1 1 I I,i{;.1,. I I � . 1 I I I„I•1•• I I I,lr P- I,I_: . , l'Ili.,l; I I ,..i 6� •.161514131211 •ill wl,.t.:I:rfvI3171 1 u I I I I I 1 1 I I;I II ��ii l I I ... -• -,.-t-1...,1u,1..i. 1_ -1..1 L..1,10 ;:r; ' > _Li": h- q-3 'oS.d �g g aa_ __ y _,..-.1-...-_ ti II ••_ 117'7i ---- 1a-2- • 4 Q 8 �1J_ II r3+- -,, '•V,9,1J Q)51� -IS I d3 L 41, 2 .ut.- • 1 I \ is)„ jo_.ti 13 ii‹) I I 17 ii 4�„3 _•/� —:-r _Aug__ ! NORTH 1 ' +`� l�a1_ (� 2: :ta ,y1 _ PlT4 55_y,�_ SCALE:I"�200'.. I I \ -- 41` _____ i -.— -- -V a. t-V cr. __rat_. • • •---••tea 1 ( VICINITY MAP I _ 1i --•-•x - T . 11 .. \. y_..._+r____I. P1F.RRF.-(_R Ain/WAVRITE •- • • . LEGEND - - , THe�/l' ` • `\,'v.1..1. �r - rn EEN.w Iwo w itrw C1Y B COIWFAONL WOSEJiPERlWTNO NOlE1 • • aroma.? .}r _ _ _ - _ _ __ _ - - -_ - - - _ _ _ -- • 10.T.K1a1S..LEI.ESIW00E(OR f/00111lNa1E16flI N.MNAOTI10 Na A14ei r ma.awn • 70.010aTUTO.Il 0 .0 • . .PBOIPFMEA4ITOETMTNOWDSU1fl •Ie aMWM YEp. w K.pw.O a w • 2 CWIMLTM EWy020240E]MTHREE CIv.RNTO.vaaa3TW.HIMYMSS O � ~ 1 1 .NCOINRRED CORR/OTaIOTOPR0•oRr.ONd.OEKIUL CO.TMOTOINOONHN1Or �,�: ma..0 f.aw...2 aST,rOFDNYi4 aOE TOREt11vO811gS ISOgEaassl 11.NaNN00001,uownr+TuwwrtfEwNE11[10 NC Ot51L\Co\tWL d wm.Kev.a iw.•E..a O T. - • `• NO6MM 000 A10.OEM NNNTan SHRUBS C 4. TEYOO`OWLwTE.Elru IL011`BSWSTU®N� MR PLUR11 art. M i \\\\o.rwno,rnn a1N.leR4NK. to we • IUNr10E00NO1M.YIWITW alrMtdSMerrc.•O.itONNM20101. % a'0000 COVERS Mgt EE RAMEO 21I1120101041.TEw4UN SOKIW I.TTTNI.T Di• e .N.....1.. O- .u01.T...a,. rY _. I _ ' EME E sl:snDO,w.0*st..1Me01rar.MuaMn :,,,TsTnc swain ` 0 Nw EMls.nsee.r.o+E ....cwTsoAr.un INS 1aE�Vj_4 1_ E.OITwnroaw,wwtN.clra.NNRE.IEVMNaartwu EWEM B:{y'1E-p• if r1101RNIr110E 1REE. venom j I REN•wEMWEEa1RnWONO M OOwnf[S ORNO111 STN1E j ( nU ST. v..o.K.. a• n., 1`'0,1000E0 1000GEMMaa,02. I O KaaKmK.m w..aaaa.a. a » — • OTOawmw Y. 1dorMI.OVOED.r O154M C • 0 .N1WKW.Is '.wNnRMUK. O r.s 1 !�� . . l 1.YNYOHTHNNTO04T0000l NYSUm1Na . 1 ys \ %a GROUND COVERS •• ,a IOKANro[rT1•.easKarouro w.EK1aENNANAMW�r0a • ' • . . c32.K..•aKl w.0.NrK. • 0 10.00 II.11wsF s0•02�O.10.1126110sl40WwOHM101lHON.M1EllYEE11NiR,1 ) 1C s C,—,Ja10K1M Nw•an .l .x¢ '_� E�y�/` --- ' \ Ta.ruxrlu51MUL LL00BON.TOMRSTNMNOSE011Ya 01000, TE1T I tI ! VA- l ...cw.a. N a..R.x �_ Ili rI""J �' — s Ea1C�w�( lEwncrarH.ralracE � .aw.amww.m m .N.ac '` — y O.a../11.w....00 "..al r�+011,0.22 100,0..c0,0100....v—q , i• .! �,, '-� J .�a..;.Mr.E.m1 ln*./T"'rwr.a....o ....•ma•l.... , • .1 4 g1ep .r+..MHw.rrR.EE.r.wl®r,.w..rm. I • ... -{ _...ti ' / IyO•r•TO'_:_ I ,' \�1 Teem 1.�M.'0.2nr- .r INO..N•..r........00.•••eow.E....E 1 l•-' 1 1....•��11040000 .r.N:.20.�rerw.m••w1r..„r..�•.rlirc •LI • \ „\ ,� � ... - rN.✓• �O,SQI y:A�I — .v�•'6 'b.:"r+:w..1.E.n mEwnTlrTwwr....+r j o 1 • "`•,J-. 11, to _ 0 �1;_ 2 n1J 1 C.. _^ _ '.'{?+ P .' . _ �T i �� I t1 .u" l"wow�iaT.ii`ilo�"nwE'i:m 1i'u"`avra.e.lon • .wvo. C [j_ '--�:..• n u*Q -,.I ��0�'. r� 1- ,.. r,,. 1 n.111.116.•mw.MMwlo•uT 1TNwoaunun201.00. 1� =.s \ �' �{� , . -'C. --'•,,\ :aY••'••• -p"a8. l ....ao.Eaa ro wi° namnavaow.n• \ .__- - /- ,. ,,.; e�; �.l illidi ' • i�e'1 •y 1"I•y 4 �',e`�! mNRaT.onaEr.wwT.aanToruww ‘it \�` . 'i ��' i.JV': 1 ;. .; y {iT"..lo•lZ We ,.1+:7;.1 u 1 • �,-� •°4 \ • • et \ a f' • -1 1 •\.. , __.....,,,__ I l 't`, 1 Gr +ice S r\ `�.6. � ��� kT, , t \" ,a n' "�.. �* Wit,` "' )'X ' ^ ,• •k•`1 ;��• -{ ,1,. + . �, '&�_`.j % :� ._ r.--y6 \''''''' " �-�•• •%- _`REw �„5l--4-�, E 1 p6 �1� '�; ei•1 E ,�oE'yT I . EI-•�' \ \�'� ?�'d✓ipEe terror, •.o•�eR,�7lll.�.�r ,I F9N1��,� / ....."-..'.........a CO 9 '' �a``P E" fly`I ��►r�'� g CC / • µSSd`! y�G�o�WP • ,, ► �i EEEyyy g ry ,>�R�� ca e. / O u. ,\. • • 51TEPl,AN / - 2 l ANDSGAPEINFORMATIONIE. , u. - :-.\-----' r.4D' — - - --- -- - - --— - — 1. Total- aquas footage CI-Ine ilia,- - - 2.74-Acids•11875E sq:It. - • Q 01/+16.fieE T aping requit = Al a •2387s. 1 • \ •` - - 3. Proposed Lanascaping spua,.loolage: Natural Landscaping lot Slldllle. 2112 sq.11.75.57 cl site) Toils load Landsa 21.1 pe-arda• o soil.I1,.l7 of Slid) Total square footage of Landscaping, atio sq•ft.la{ei Of SILO • • • 1of: • EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES FG■■■ 1. 6'pro-colored(IIt,t gray,spilt Gacs OU. {EG-I[` 2. e'pre-colored(dark rey,swath lace aiU. G1+1; 3. 1'Insulated safety glass In clur anodlied aimsn lr rel.Ostorefront fusing. rO 0 4. Profinished ntal guitar and dowspout lyp.(grew) LLQ s. IMlules rotor.nigh oy Tansl _ r.r ej.-- 6. Overhead door WI ` I Is I 11 11 7. 1'Insulated glass In clear anodized aluslnua porelrmt 'fill —_' I I I I B. getat Roolina(ahem) �.• 11110141711I�I ,�•. 6. Fula anodized l rnnl �^�-'• 0 G. Clear anodized a rnlrun storefront door 4fQ•"" Jwn.!!!Gl1LlS"3-. 11. Etlerlor mtsl door iii1li1! ql ��.3=`l,Ii' J!€? SIGNAGCALCULATIONS zv� I .. . -.....; . 1 4 Facto Bow signs (3•-0•a 15•-61 Area-1E8 sa•It. Q U 1 0 0 O O O 2 Logo Sian(double sided, (3'-6•a 17•-61 Area-122.6 sa•It. LLJ Total sign sq.ft.- 332.5 as.It. SOUTH ELEVATION Y5 1 WY r4'a'PRrrt 622.341 -Z i ■ • ■ CI w g1g e = Y \:1— 1 o wl �JgDGGOaL-- ' ' � [• 1 -i . II I I � , 1 a ! I I' i s J I I 1 I. 1 1 ! I I IpO ,em. 4l _111 11111111111111111111111 :119111111II 11111111111111111111111111111111111114111I@III1 11111111111111111111:11111111111111111111111.l0 guilMoim a3cam r.- •>Z^stad• ,G•• aGSSii - 1'' 0• 8s• 01 a ifs _ .i _ 4-'4iii L=G71 I t GRfIGIlf. . 1N H z 00 O ° O O O O o1cQ Q O LAMP ELEVATIONS SIGN ELEVATION oc 0 NORTH ELEVATION Va•-ro'ar FRNT 6 22.347 s a•-ro•ar rim 6 32•34'1 X - CuI/V-ro•(r F Rrr 6 2ra347 - (- Q Iu 0 • 1g 0 0 0 0 0 0 & a.a. ——r— 1 a7y '�— u la. Mb P. �— ..h.-1 11.11.1.11"- .a�, ���I I ��II :11I �ioi1��°I�iii"mil19.!1611I dII o fL1111 111 ;-0 —II r=gii.11119in,...,,,,1111� �� ��1�� ����'11IJ g�a r �S.isn1S1.11ils.cr-S111 - r--:s _{��{�:t a3�?i t- YYL_ O�i+.rYYiif�_ni�R-�Y�;s i�i .� Yfilli�S o 3i tip i _ .g5.�i_ LSLiS i �ii' �'!C WA wr - S--7.. ...^•a D= ...EraFi4:.—. 'r-a......{•I-�L G [! Gn i s vG G G pFss � � L-?�fii!!£raF i!3�ts!i!!!r3'irisrs+li?Gs!Firsn A[ i ii!i'R zii? 3 1wa;F!ligFg ---miFil;_litialenFPsE».I..��-.SFiEllar O O il O O 00 00 Q 0 0 a nwe<+Maw 'woad Di MIA EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION oema% 1 ro-(r IRKT 6 2Ta341 Ur-ro-ar rgra 6 22S341 4 0 2 4 a n ��^ Roam Na guano GA c.ua-ro "°a° A3.1 r 7o1•Ia • • • • • -- - -- • EXTERIOR COLOR LEGEND ••'�,•••• O` 1>c,1 Mir r+51M11 OOP O COM 11999fAI18t-ed . . . Br 011IEFIS ISOSC y!SitVE P_YC„ ' ',.— --_•-".':r-f.._a:''1•::;:_ o Q evert MAY Oj wa.arceurwr-ad Food art 19TN1O . o I9N1B i. aa1w.'.wa��++av,w.a.mrwocmoawawxm� +vemx:+� aea..vvw.wae,....: O daua90 O taa.®eearvY — 1w1b A9O.919o06 O f \\ w1xo... \\ .\ " \\ 5 raa.111e 411l93 .7 \ \\ \ O5 s9rco -�.�.' -- F •.1 1 x`7✓ i / 1t . •.` ' 1 A R NOTES,, \ I , + t;/ *:?'...'Prof ✓,'�r^ c-� O SOW/ . • • ••• • _, . ✓ (!7 <>S9ao 1.800400811800I804.62910499u 88I9.217I G NA 1.198 Our 10.940.0UC9fA0O /COM 1MIGIAU D1®A9MMOW9 O N EAST ELEVATION 1.U90l,woWA•D Nr99 AOYQn VI IIL WOK OW rAagfL GEM MR gtOTMIR MI2 a Wr.A0O NfgORA131•19 911 O WOGa 11D014NO1 b 890.81OiMM%1119170% }- J SCALE I/4'.t'-0' SIBOfesrnllerelOOof Q J ♦MK9�M 19b Y1 19041019OMH9 1f Na; Wpl ¢1ql 1 O FIGOGY®AL1l • I W I ~Y: . _ - •.�• QAZPlC C,1LMA7}ONS F— >al O I• n - 5O Irr1wR bW•AI1•MCA mrm a••Am Q Fb; v \ 880.MG.MG rt0aow9 wu NIA oO W Q.zu� _ su = xa z 3. • a I • >I co o • WQi O5 so.o accI • e a �s - r t ,. ,' O surto Q U .c...'1. r. t r>s, 1.,,1.. •2,..i;,n,.y.ssa<w.} ..u..t.:ti x.t,..,..r;.•flt "-h.'_s...V bfN,1_ . LL_ U . Oswo • Lii 1 NMI VIM NORTHWEST ELEVATION (SOUTHWEST ELEV. SIM) __ SCALE 1/4..1'-0' • ` O IIS1fle y GSEORE 'i.1 \-. ELEVATIONS c O• r¢+1rimArx al Ohe MG 9703 _ J Dabs he f9 v c iuq . 5O S11vo • m i • y f r. .t r r 1 j I.. s, /f 0 snvo c .''_.<. .._,°4,'...r�}v. .�i1 ,. ...;.r,3 „i:.. I.t.ir.,. x1n, .-..•-E.11....F,nY....t.,,fSvl.ir.1.14 .•!.' O snrro 0 L 1 I ANAL VIp1 . O. Shan NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION SIM) a . u • ba fir_ j :Sri'':�:::;':`:;:`5::�:::Y�:�:>�:�::�;::?�::;::;::�;:;:;::;;::<;;::<;:;;:�:{:f;:R�:Y:::;:;�::�:%�f:;:'+.:::;;";;•::•:�;:;::::•:::.>:<.>;;;::<•::<•::•::.:»:<.::�>:•::•:c:;•::<;•:;•;:;:;•:::::•>:•::•::�::•>;::<.:;.:.;:.;:::<:<•;:•:::•>:•>:�::;:;::•:;•;:s:•::;:•::•r::;•::t<•::•s:•::•:�:•::•:••:::::.:�........................................... • On the L�' ' day of OCk A)e' , 1998, I deposited in the mails of.t a United • States, a sealed envelope containing tiepovut to tine ltearrtv4oi �ka-Inn t 1ti0.r documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing Vicki YVtovvls V tc,V-4 Wtorms Co+ASU lk1ri S wice l0.1"6,,e' "ewe. 'Dortaci • • • • • (Signature of Sender) SuAdm.% . Cr,c0014.4,— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . ;��,p� 9 ��-r signed this. instrument and acknowledged it to be. his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • Dated: // /4 ly g -7-27 1 Notary Public' and for he State of W gton • Notary (Print topikliwittmetivicprEFF____ My appointor COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: Pierre- S1kC Project Number: yu .___�j • NOTARY.DOC • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION -- - Lori L. Furnish first duly-sworn on oathstates-that-he/she-is the-Legal Clerk of the- - - - - - - ---- -- -- - - - NOTICE•OF,ENV.IRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL , ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE f• - RENTON,WASHINGTON 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)'has issued a Determination of Non- • Significance - Mitigated for the following .' a daily newspaper published seven (7) times-a--week Said_newspaper_is_alegal - project under the authority of the Renton •newspaper ofgeneral ublication and is now and has been for more than six months Municipal:Code. P ; PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE - prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language i LUA98-126,SA-H,R,ECF - - j -- - continually as a daily newspaper in Kent,'King County, Washington. The South County A Site Plan Approval, Environmental '-i Review.and a Rezone fora proposal to Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ,construct a gas station,convenience store, State of Washington for King County. rand a car rental/sales office. Location:SW ' The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the South Countyl d P Way between Oakesdale Ave SW ,;and Powell Ave SW. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers r Appeals of the environmental determine- tionriting on or before . during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ,5:00 PMttOc blerd119,1998.Appeals must• I be filed in writing together with the required Pierre Grady Way Site $75.00 application fee with: Hearing • Examiner, City of-Renton, 1055 South 1 Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to ; as published on: 10/5/98 the Examiner are governed by City of "Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.' Additional information regarding the appeal The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $60.10 process may be obtained from the Renton Legal Number 5239 City CPublic Office, (g25)4l be6held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular I meeting in the Council Chambers on the I / 'seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South j Grady Way, Renton, WA on'November 3, Legal Clerk, South County Journal 11998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan I Approval and Rezone.If the Environmental`i Determination is appealed,the appeal will (/l (1�( /'be heard as part of this public hearing. Subscribed and sworn before me on this /C day of (O(t , 19 (V Interested4rittie"s a kigi�'_.p.T�,,,x, ., `, ted�,to attend the public hearingr,:r., +�:.-:-1-- it PublicationlDate:October 5 1998,, ,1111tl!1FI►/flf r--(,,--d-, ii,,(4e, Publis5 1998the SouftiCounty:Journal • %��o�`� P.1. .• , October 5,1998.5239 .$`_„��-NS-, •��.- �'.``% Notary Public of the State of Washington , — - ,- Q, c°\ residing in Renton j. < ` » ,,,� King County,Washington _ -� - • • • .11 .I < O.UN IL CHAM ERS 7TH FLOOR RENTON CITY.:HALL..::::::.. < atio ed r dT r s:::::.t::.:.::a.:�::►n.:�.r..:::�:::pf.:a.. .:1..::. e �i . :e . ::.:a . : r: <:::>::::::::::::>::>::> e�.rl.n ;;�t<.fh�:d scr...:tior�.�f:>th�.H..ar�.n >:F.�a�..n.�r.;:::;..............:::::.:�:.:::. PROJECT NAME: RC Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-145,SHPL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to subdivide a 1.22 acre parcel into six (6) lots intended for single ;family residential development. The lot sizes range between 5,300 sq. ft. and 15,99k sq. ft. • Access to Lots 1 through 5 would be provided via a private access easement off NE 27th Street. Access to an existing residence on Lot 6 would be from an existing private driveway. The subject site ;s zoned Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8) which permits a density range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The density of the; proposal is 4.93 dwelling units per acre. The Zoning Code allows the minimum density requirement to be reduced by the reviewing official, provided the applicant can show that the inimum density cannot be achieved due to lot configuration, lack of access or physical constraints. Location: 2625 NE 27t1-1) Street. • PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-126,SA-R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a gas station; convenience store, anii a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 21,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks.• A building pad of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned fbr future, expansion. On-site piarking is proposed for 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 spaces for the auto display and customer parking needs'of the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady,Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, via .a 20 foot wide easement through the lEagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW. Antkln&nnc • City of Renton PUBLI C Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING ,PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:. ., Public Hearing Date: November 3, 1998 Project Name: Pierre Grady Way Site Applicant/ James Pierre Address: 11525 Lake City Way NE Seattle, WA. 98125 Owner/ James P. and Barbara Lynn Pierre Address: 11525 Lake City Way NE 'Seattle, WA. 98125 File Number: LUA-098-126, SA-H, R, ECF Project Manager: Peter osen Project Description: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental salesoffice. ' The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to 'Medium Industrial (IM). The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building,,four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 2 ,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would includ a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building, with the remaining portion planned for future exp nsion. On- site parking is proposed for 174 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocate to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 164 spaces for the auto display and customer parking needs of the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Gra y Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, via a foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. Project Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW 1 ! g T H N I f. •-'� i / -:--� • E 6 n� - gi iF 4 1 mnv[1[u[ 3...2 , `IEn:II '.11E R iS a . 4 1 ER. v ,I maaunomv� IOiH " [unT .1t``1.[vunorzi �M �v.uxr 0 f .///�� y,PY . GR pY I' , �y,. jF, lettt, 0" i J'. rr'' 11���� INTERSTAT ‘I __SW. - i6TH Sr , City of Renton P/B/PW Depa ent - Preliminary Report to the ,Hearing Examiner PIERREGRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126i SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 2 of 11 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: { 1. Owner ofRecord: James P. and Barbara Lynn Pierre 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Office (existing) Medium Industrial (proposed) 3. Comprehensive flan Employment Area Valley(EAV) Land Use Desig at:on. 4. Existing Site Use: Undeveloped. - 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Hotel, Eagle Hardware Corporate Office East: Industrial warehouse South: SW Grady Way, City University West: Metro Treatment Plant 6. Access: SW Grady Way, Oakesdale Ave. SW, Powell Ave. SW. 7. ; Site Area: 2.74 acre 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: NA New Building Area: 5,250 sq. ft. - Phase I 10,000 sq. ft. -Total Total Building Area: 5,250 sq. ft. - Phase I 10,000 sq. ft. -Total C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 1745 4-14-59 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2-20-95 Zoning Code 4404 6-7-93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Hearing Examiner- Chapter 8- Section 4-8-14.C., Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). 2. Zoning Code-Chapter 31, Section 4-31-11.2., Medium Industrial Zone. 3. Zoning Code-Chapter 31, Section 4-31-33, Site Plan Review. 4. Parking Lx1 Loading Ordinance- Chapter 14. HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the J-tearing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126, SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 3 of 11 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LAND USE ELEMENT 1. Employ(ment Area Valley: Objective LU-EE.a: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, ffice and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.3 Development standards should promote an increased intensity and quality of dev lopment. Policy LU-212.6 Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utili 'ation and result in benefits to users with techniques including: a. shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; b. an improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and c. an opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial nd office use. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when r asonable buffering between the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deli eries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained. Objective LU-EE.b: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing for a variety of zone designations in the Employment Areal-Valley designation. Policy LU-212.11 Changes in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to another should be considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse land use impacts may be taken into account. Policy LU-212:12 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/or com atible uses are already located in the area. PolicyLU-212.13 F avorable consideration should be given to rezones where there is an opportune to create improved efficiencies of use through the joint use/sharing of on site facilities such as parking, open space and supporting services. Policy LU-212.14 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones to Commercial Arterial (CA) only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 7th Street or is located north of 1-405 and south of 10th Avenue SW and the area under consideration is part of a designation totaling over 5 acres(acreage may be in separate ownerships). Policy LU-212.15b Favorable consideration should be given to rezones for large scale commercia uses or uses ancillary,to large scale uses provided that the ancillary uses are built at the same time as or after th large scale use and the rezone is sufficiently large so as to create improved efficiencies of use. Objective LU-EE.c: Ensure quality development in Employment Area-Valley. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. • HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the -leafing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126 j SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 4 of 11 , Policy LU-212.20 Wh n more intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse impacts should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU-212.22 Crelate a logical and harmonious working environment in mixed-use developments through the application of appropriate development standards, emphasizing landscaping, setbacks and sidewalk treatment for all uses. Policy LU-212.23 Site design for office uses should consider ways of improving transit ridershi through siting, locating of pedestrian amenities,walkways, parking, etc. Policy LU-212.24 Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Renton Valley and Black River areas pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant requests site plan approval to construct a gas station, convenience store, and • a car rental/sales office. The proposal also includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). Gas stations and auto rental/ 'ales uses are not permitted under the current CO zoning. Therefore,the applicant requires a proval of the rezone to establish the proposed uses on the site. The gas station/convenience store would consist of a 1,300 square foot building, fcur fueling islands covered by a 2,650 square foot canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. The gas station/convenience store is located in the southwest corner of the site, oriented to the intersection of SW Grady Way and cbakesdale Ave. SW. The car rental/sales office is located in the north-central part of the site, avoiding r strictions to building restrictions under the powerline right-of-way. The site plan application is for a building pad of approximately 10,000 square feet. The applicant plans on initial construction of a 5,250 square foot one-story building, with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. The expansion area would serve as parking until the time of building expansion. Auto display parking fronts the site along SW Grady Way. No on-Site vehicle maintenance is proposed on the site. Vehicle washing would be associated with the car rental/sales use only, and would be enclosed at the rear of the structure, equipped with a drainage collection system to discharge to the sanit ry sewer system. On-site parking is proposed for 174 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 164 spaces for the auto display and customer parking needs of the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, via a 20 foot wide easemen that exits the northeast corner of the site and goes through the Eagle Hardware Corpor rte Office parking lot to reach Powell Avenue SW. The subject site is presently undeveloped with buildings. A Special Fill and Gra e Permit was approved by the Hearing Examiner for the placement of approximately 18, 00 cubic yards of fill on the site in August-September 1997. The placement of fill created level site and prepared the site for construction. HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-1261 SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 5 of 11 There are high voltage power lines that pass through in an east/west dire ion, and north/south electrical distribution lines that convey power from the high voltage line for local use. The potential for building on the site is constrained because buildings are rohibited under the high voltage powerline right-of-way. The applicant is negotiating with Pu et Sound Energy Services to place some power lines underground and relocate other. Th proposal under negotiation is to bury the east/west power lines crossing the site and to re ocate the north/south power lines offsite to the west. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43. 1 C, 1971 as amended), on September 29, 1998 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. The mitigation measures are listed below. The coinment/appeal period for the SEPA determination ended on October 19, 1998 and there were no comments or appeals filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based do an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $678.60 for the gas st tion/mini- mart and $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payab e prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is est mated at $50,010 (666.8 trips x $75 = $50,010). This fee is payable prior to issuance o Building Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Represehtatives from various city departments have reviewed the application m terials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the repot. HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton P/8/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126 SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 6 of 11 5. CONS STENCY WITH REZONE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-8-14.C: In the case where a change of the zone classification of property is recommended, at least one of the following circumstances shall be found to apply: GENERAL CRITERIA: a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or In 1993, with adoption of the GMA Comprehensive Plan and zoning, the subject property was designated Employment Area - Office (EAO) with corresponding Commercial Office (CO) zoning. Previously, the site had Office Park designated on the northern parcel and Manufacturing Park over the remainder of the site along SW Grady Way. T Were is no background that Medium Industrial zoning was considered for the property with th adoption of the City-wide zoning. In 1994, Puget Power requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ezone to Commercial Arterial (CA). This request was denied. In 1996, a City-initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment revised the Comprehensive Plan designation on the site to Employment- Area Valley (EAV). This area-wide amendment affected nearly all of the Valley , with the purpose to allow a wider range of commercial, office and industrial uses. Policies were adopted to specifically provide for regulatory flexibility to rezone properties without requiring amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being r?quested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate that change is appropriate; or The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element was amended in August, 1996 to establish one land us designation for the entire Valley area, the Employment Area - Valley (EAV). The overall intent of the EAV designation was to provide for a mix of employment-ba ed uses, including industrial, commercial, and office. Objective LU-EE.b.: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing for a variety of zone designations in the Employment Area-Valley designation. The EAV d signation considers underlying commercial, office, and industrial zoning districts as consistent with the EAV. Therefore, changes between zoning designations do not require a Comp ehensive Plan Amendment. Adopted policies specifically address the conditions or situatidns where rezone applications should receive favorable consideration. Policy LU-212.11: Changes in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to another should be considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficie cy in the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential advers land use impacts may be taken into account. The proposed auto rental/sales use would increase the City's tax base. The proposed uses are an appropriate and efficient use of the land. The subject site is located at the intersection of arterials SW Grady Way and Oakes4ale Ave., providing both good access and visibility for customer-oriented commercial uses. Development potential of the site is severely limited due to restrictions of co structing buildings under the powerline right-of-way and due to the narrow configurati n of the property and required setbacks. Therefore, utilizing the site mostly for surface au o display parking and relatively small buildings is an efficient use of the site. Policy LU-212.8: Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Val ey, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibilit , to more HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the I-learing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE I LUA-98-126I,SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 7 of 11 intensive commercial and office uses. Good access and high visibility are major at ributes of the site that support the proposed commercial uses. Office uses presently allowed under the existing CO zoning would be less desirable given the close proximity of the heavily traveled arterials. Policy LU-212.21: Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/orcompatible uses are already located in the area. There are many existing auto dealers along SW Grady Way to the west of the subject site. The proposal would be consistent with this existing land use pattern. The proposal would be compatible in character (scale, appearance)with uses immediately surrounding the site and supportive in terms of services offered to existing land uses in the area. The gas station wOld be a complementary use to the on-site rental car agency. Both uses are likely to serve the adjacent hotel and the office/light industrial parks to the north and northeast. c. That si ce the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant an material changeJ The subject site has remained vacant since annexation to the City of Renton in April 1959. The applicant purchased the property in 1996. In 1997, the applicant applied for and received approval of a Special Fill and Grade Permit to place approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill on the site to bring it up to grade with adjacent streets. A subsurface) drainage collection system was installed where an open drainage channel previously bisecte1 the site. This action was coordinated and approved by the City of Renton, which owns the drainage easement, and with the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. Approximately 100 feet at the west end of the drainage channel was left open, with a vegetated bottom and side slopes, for water quality enhancement, prior to stormwater discharge from the site to the Renton P-1 Channel. These site improvements represent significant and material changes undertaken by the property owner since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning. Oakesdale Avenue SW currently terminates approximately one block south of 6W Grady Way. During 1998, the city of Renton began constructing a southward extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW to SW 27th Street. The second phase of this roadway project is scheduled to complete Oakesdale Avenue SW as a through route to SW 29th street in 1999. Oakesdale Avenue SW is projected to receive considerable traffic use as an alternate route to the I-405/SR 167 interchange. This is a significant public investment and improvement that was not anticipated when the existing zoning on the site was adopted in 1993. The services proposed, a gas station, mini mart, and car rental sales/agency, are not currently available in the northeast quadrant of the City, and would be conveniently accessible to motorists along the SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW arterial corridors. 6. CONSIISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion m y not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to d scourage • creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NO EMBER 3, 1998 Page 8 of 11 GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ITS ELEMENTS el POLICIES The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation. The EAV land use designation was adopted for the entire Green Ri+P er Valley area by the City Council in August 1996. The overall objective of the EAV designation is to allow foil a range of employment-based industrial, office and commercial uses. The proposed gas station/convenience store and car rental/sales office is consi tent with EAV policies. Policy LU-212.8 promotes the transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial use. The subject site is located at the intersection of arterials SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Ave., providing both good access and visibility for customer-oriented commercial uses. Commercial development of the site is constrained by limits of constructing buildings under the powerline right-of-way. Therefore, utilizing the site for surface auto display parking and relatively small buildings is appropriate as an intensive commercial utilization of the site. The proposed site plan includes design features to respond to policy direction. Policy LU- 212.21 and LU-212.6 encourage efficiency in site utilization with vehicular coinnections between parking areas and shared access and parking. The proposal includes a secondary access connection through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking area to connect to Powell Ave. SW. The proposed site development of the gas station and car rental/sales office would use common access drives and landscaping provides an overall appearance of a coordinated development project. Policy LU-212.20 states that new more intensive uses should be responsible for mitigating adverse impacts on less intensive existing u+es. The proposal includes a-natural landscape area along the northwest L-shaped borderI which is contiguous with the stormwater landscaping on the adjacent hotel site. This would function to mitigate potential impacts of the proposal on the adjacent hotel use. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The pr Iposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The analysis of the rezone is provided in a previous section of this report. The following discussion assumes approval of the rezone because the proposed gas station and auto rental/sales uses are not permitted under the current CO zoning. The analysis below is according to the requirements and development standards of the IM zone. Permitted Uses Gas stations are allowed in the IM zone as a secondary use subject to site plan approval. All uses listed as primary permitted uses in the Light Industrial (IL) zone are also pemitted in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Mini-marts were added to the list of permitted uses in the IL zone by Ordinance No. 4715, approved April 1998. Auto sales and rentals are a permitted use in the IL zone and thereby allowed in the IM zone. Setbacks-The IM zone requires a front/street building setback of a minimum of 20 feet along all streets designated as principal arterials. Both Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW Grady Way are identified as principal arterials. Both proposed buildings meet the 20 foot setback requirement. The gas station/convenience store at the intersection is adjacent to the 20 foot setback tine. The car rental/sales office is setback 115 feet from SW Grady Way. There are no side or rear yard setback requirements in the IM zone. There are no special setback requirements because the subject property is not adjacent to or abutting any residentially zoned lots. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the eating Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE 1 LUA-98-126 SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 9 of 11 Landscaping- For lots fronting arterial streets, the IM zone requires a landscape strip of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet whichever is less. In no case may the landscape strip b less than 10 feet wide. The proposal includes a 20 foot landscape strip along Oakesdale Avenue SW. The landscape strip along SW Grady Way is 20 feet wide at the intersection with Oakesdale Ave. SW and then tapers to 13 feet where it meets the west driveway, to reflect the narrowing lot width. The landscape strip increases back to a 20 foot width across the center ' of the site abutting SW Grady Way. After the east driveway the landscape strip decreases to 10 feet, again reflecting the narrow width of the site. The landscaping along Pow II Avenue SW meets the code standard of a 15 foot width for non-arterial streets. The la dscaping along thr street frontages meets the requirements of the code. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square uare feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. The parking fronting SW Grady Way is for auto display and is not subject to this code requirement. The customer and employee parking area around the buildings and the perimeter of the site includes landsca e islands totaling 3,254 square feet or approximately 7% of the total parking lot area. The subject site is located within the Green River Valley and the code requires a natural landscape area equal to 2% of the gross site area. The proposed site plan inclu es 6,590 square feet of natural landscape area, equal to 5.5% of the site area, along the no hwest L- shaped border. This area is contiguous with the natural landscape area retained b the hotel to the north. Height- The IM zone does not specify a maximum building height. The proposed maximum building height is 19 feet. Parking Requirements-The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance requires differeit parking ratios for various uses proposed on a site. According to the required ratios, 55 parking stalls would be required for the first phase of the project, and a total of 76 parking stalls with the expansion of the auto rental/sales office building. The site plan does not clearly c#istinguish all the auto display parking spaces from the parking reserved for customers and employees. There are 10 parking spaces clearly associated with the gas station/convenience store, 7 are required by code. Assuming the auto display parking includes all the frontage area along SW Grady Way, there are 90 auto display spaces, leaving a total of 84 parking paces for the customers and employees of the building uses which meets the 76 spaces required by code. The proposed building expansion would take up approximately 22 parkin spaces, resultina in 62 spaces which is short of the 76 required spaces. The applicant wou d need to convert some of the auto display parking to provide the number of required parking spaces. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AN USES; The proposal would not result in undesirable impacts on surrounding properties and uses. The proposed buildings are 1-story and would not obstruct views. The proposal includes landscaping along all street frontages and the perimeters of the site. There is a 3-story hotel adjacent to the northwest corner of the site. The natural landscape areas required of both sites form a contiguous buffer to obscure views between the hotel and the proposal site. The hotel entry and activities are focused off Oakesdale Avenue SW and there are no significant windows of the hotel building overlooking the site. The Eagle Hardwa�e corporate office borders the site to the northeast. The proposal i cludes a secondary access drive through the parking lot. The drive exits the back northeas corner of the site behind the auto rental/sales building and would not be highly visible to customers. Therefore, the secondary drive would not attract significant traffic through t'he Eagle Hardware office parking area. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the ,Hearing Examiner • PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126,!SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 10 of 11 (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; A Special Fill and Grade Permit was approved by the Hearing Examiner for the placement of approximately 18,000 cubic yards of fill on the site in August-September 1997. The placement of fill created a level site and readied the site for construction of the proposal. There are no significant natural features remaining on the site which would be impacted by the propi sal. Under the previous fill and grade permit, a subsurface stormwater conveyance s (stem was installed in a former open drainage channel through the property. It was determined in 1997 through technical review that the former drainage channel was not a natural watercourse and does no provide fisheries habitat due to irregular flows and poor water quality. (Washington Depart gent of Fish and Wildlife, July 11, 1997). Approximately 100 feet of open drainage channel1 remains at the west end of the property, adjacent to Oakesdale Av nue SW. Channel side slopes have been reinforced with gabion walls. The channel bottom and side slopes have been seeded with grass to provide biofiltration stormwater quality treatment for drainage exiting the subject property via a culvert under Oakesdale Avenue SW, prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. The subject site is constrained by limits to building under the powerline right-of-way. Utilizing the site for surface auto display parking with relatively small buildings is an appropriate use given site constraints. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; e The proposed commercial development is expected to conserve or strengthen area-wide property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Four neiv points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, via a 20 foot wide easement that exits the northeast corner of the site and goes through the Eagle Hardware Corpor to Office parking lot to reach Powell Avenue SW. The driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW is approximately 120 feet north of the intersection with SW Grady Way. The driveway location is as far from the intersection as is possible on the property. Future increases in traffic on Oakesdale Avenue SW, anticipated with the planned improvements of Oakesdale Avenue SW, may warrant limiting turning movements from the driveway in the future. Internal(circulation is designed for safe and efficient vehicular movement. There is adequate pedestrian access provided from SW Grady Way to building entries. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed 1-story building heights, extensive paved areas and landsc.ping are appropriate for the provision of adequate light and air on the site. HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton PB/PW Department - - Preliminary Report to the Tearing Examiner PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE LUA-98-126J'SA-H,R,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1998 Page 11 of 11 (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHE�LTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors would result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. After completion of the project there would be noise associated with the auto traffic. This noise would not be beyond levels normally anticipated of alto-related commercial uses. The proposal is not expected to generate odors or other unhealthy conditions. (9) SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposed commercial development. The Fire Department has indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the proposed uses. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGIiT. The proposal would develop a site that has good visibility and frontage along SW Grady Way, a Iprincipal commercial arterial. The proposal is expected to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Pierre Grady Way Site File No. LUA-98-126, SA-H, R, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. ,(2) Site plan approval shall be contingent upon approval of the rezone from Commercial Office .(CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE i (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a , car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four,fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad,' of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial • construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new pdints of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and'a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from !a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a req est to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart aid $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to tie issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average da ly trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $50,010 (666.8 trips x$75 = $50,010). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES . • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad Iof approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW.Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a requl st to rezone the site from Commercial Office•(GO)to Medium Industrial (M). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL -,'=' `` .; :'SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. . SSW . Advisory Notes to Appl icanf: ., The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they,are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. <r FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station/Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The preliminary fire flow for the Rental Cllar Building is 2500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the • building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate.plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored•on site. • PLAN REVIEW Water 1. New water mains, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required to meet current)Fire Codes/Regulations per the Renton Fire Department. 2.Any new water mains!fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area is required. Surface Water 1,. Drainage and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of"Renton. The applicant will be required topay storm,drainage (SDC) `fees of$0.129/sq.:ft,. of new impervious surface installed by the project. ' •Pierre Grady Way Site LUA-9 8-126,SA-H,R,EC F Advisory,Notes(Continued) Wastewater 1. New side sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with a permit cost of $80/connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Transportation 1.All.proposed driveways to serve the site shall be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locations approved by the City's Traffic Engineering Section. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS All landscaped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. • • • • I . • OtiY 0vt + , . CITY OF RENTON bat FIRE PREVENTION.BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Way Project, SW Grad Way at Oakesdale Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station- Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The preliminary fire flow for the Rental Car Building is 2500 GPM, which requires one hydrant with 150 feet of the building and two addition hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$678.60 is required for the Gas Station - Mini Mart and the Rental Car Building fee is $2,730.00 based on $.52 a square foot of building square footage. Please feel free o contact me if you have any questions. • • City 4.r Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ` v_s COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,SA H,R,ECF. DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.'&Mrs.James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady Way Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW SITE AREA 2.74 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANSION GROSS): 6,555 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 s' ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. : is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building, with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking;is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to'the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW,from a 20 foot wide easement through the.Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(Ie.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable •Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing I Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glan3 Plants Recreation I Land/Shoreline Use' Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services I Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet G � y2 r✓ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS % 12(, JVCiiievazneq/ >00,5felealf-72.R2 C. CODE-RELATED.COMMENTS We have reviewed this applicationwith'particular attention to those areas in which we ave expertise and have identified areas of protable impact or areas where additional information Is ne ded tl properly assess this proposal. I /./ZV !gin urC a of Director or Authorized Representative DEVAPP.DOC - Rev.10/93 I City of rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET t . EVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Co atom Sevv(cc& COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1994 PPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr.;&Mrs.James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen Cl .).. ROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady Way Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 \OA. 46� OCATION: SW Grady, Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW �O � cc,ITE AREA: 2.74 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXP$1 N GiO S):�61 5 �y I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car r&-I/sa gS office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered b . ,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of.approx. 1 I r,4,1 sq.'ft. is Proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq.ft. one-story •• ngg,with the -emaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking.is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of those spaces re allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Foul-new points f driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave: SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. pW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The propos I also ncludes a rezone from Comme icial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a reque t to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). • r4• ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment i Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I . Housing Air , Aesthetics I, Water I Light/Glare I Plants I Recreation 1' Land/Shoreline Use 1 Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services I, Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources. • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS - • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS (pLL ow &c) ( 1- Ire I✓pc'14-T g C o t•-'t 1-4 N pm-T l o (.-) 1 We have reviewed'this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and.have Identified areas of prob ble impact or areas where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ) 1 C-8 yt 7 3 Signature of Director or Authorized Repri sentative Date DEVAPP.DOC T Rev.10/93 - City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review Water Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 I' Applicant: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site Area: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 A.Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments i New water main, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be required to met current Fire Codes/Regulations per the Renton Fire Department. Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/s• ft. of gross area of the site is required. 4• 1,,‘,w1A F-10-9'8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierre2 ' - City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 Applicant: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site Area: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: Drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The site will be required to pay storm drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed by the project to the site. Wastewater: New side sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with permit cost of $80/connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierrel - . . • - City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department; Transportation Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 Applicant: Mr. &Mrs.lJames Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site Area: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments p No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments All proposed driveways to serve the site will be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locations approved by the City's Traffic Engineering Section. A traffic mitigation fee of $75/trip will be required (see attached traffic mitigation fee calculation memorandum). Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierre3 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 TO: ETER ROSEN FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE- LUA-98-126 • TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION i I have reviewed the traffic report prepared by Michael R Birdsall and Associates (5/29/98) for th Pierre Grady Way site, and cannot concur with the conclusions for the trip generation values an traffic mitigation fees. The assumptions used for passby trips are much higher than used fo similar projects, and there is no reduction in traffic mitigation fees for "very short trip lengths of net new trips". The trip igeneration values which should be used for determining the traffic mitigation fees for thi project are shown below. Gas Station/Convenience Store: We have had several other projects of this nature in the rece t past. The values used were estimated from the ITE Manual Land Use #845, Service Station wi Convenience Market. The trip generation value used is 143.05 trips per pump island, with assumption of 44% of the these trips being new primary trips. This proposal has four pum islands, with net new daily trips of: (4)(143.05)(0.44) = 251.8 daily trips The optional second story office above the market: The figures calulated in the traffic report ar acceptable. Per page 2 of the report: 7 daily trips Car rental portion: The figures calculated in the report can be accepted with the revisions. The miscellaneous trips can be considered passby and not included. There is no reduction for "very short net new trips". New daily trips: 52 + 20 + 4 = 76 daily trips Used car portion: Figures calculated in report are acceptable. 62 daily trips Future restauraunt: No deduction allowed for "short trip lengths of net new trips" 270 daily trips Traffic mitigation fees shall be $75 per net new daily trips, based upon the above values. • City or rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Pub Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW, SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: VtAtc,.G COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 198 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 _ APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs.James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady Way Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW SITE AREA: 2.74 acres I_BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANSION GROSS): 6,555 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building,four fueling islands covered.by.a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq I ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story buildin I, with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking.is proposed for.approx. 168 cars, 10 of tl ese spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Fo r new points of driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to owell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easerrient through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The propos I also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a requ st to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). t•C k, �� LI A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts. . Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics II Water , Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals 1 Transportation Environmental Health Public Services I Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources , • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 3.4 police calls for service annually, based on the size of the buildiig. This calculation ,is based on a formula for 9-1-1-calls to commercial buildings in th City of Renton, and Is not seperlated by the different types of businesses. Therefore, tie to the type of businesses in this proposal (auto sales lot and convenience store/gas s ation) , the ,actual number of calls will be very high. This site is situated in the R-1 police district of Renton; an area which .repor s the highest number of commercial burglaries, thefts , auto related thefts and car prowls , then any other area in the 'City. - In order to 6help prevent theft of building materials and tools while the site is under construction, it will need security fencing around the perimeter of the site, aid all tools and building materials will need to be secured when -not in use. Recommend the site receive portable, temporary security lighting, as well . uto Theft and Car Prowl/Vandalism to Vehicles is one of the major problems to businesses in this area of town. Recommend the car sales area have perimeter fencing around .he car lot to help prevent the theft of vehicles and removal from the property. This fencing can be •s simple as chain-and-prole, that will still allow visibility by customers, but prevent C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 'We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9-q-cir �� 10 � Sl a re of Directo r A o Repres ntative Date DEVAPP.DOC , Rev.1W93 • • • • N9U ate- — - - �� l' g JAMIE PIERRE - GRADY WAY �a OAKESDALE zQ EC 41 REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL DRAWINGS a<�t 3 — — — 1-N-S-ECT1ON-24 TOWNSHIP-23-NORTH RAN-GE-4-EAST W-M. • CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON I g UTILITY GRID 4324 N.E. 1/4 N W - <w PRE-APPLICATION FILE #98-024 a w-y American Engineering Corporation •cc i ..r = • Cs.'z, �2 %= En9inurs • Planners • Surveyors = • - O0 < 4032 148Ih Ave.N.E.Redmond,WA 96032••PHONE(206)881-7430 Fax(206)881-7731 PROJECT INFORMATION: _ `- �z :Li SITE LOCATION: E-w a ,...),:4 c e EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) N.E. CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF 'E SW GRADY WAY AND OAKESDALE AVE. S.W. PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IM (MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL) S' RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 TOTAL SITE AREA: 2.74 ACRES @yl u / / TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 0 S.F. f a OWNER: sW 71H sr \ TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 91.040 S.F. 1 I 1; SITE 1 DETENTION OF STORMWATER: DETENTION NOT REQUIRED. I JAMIE PIERRE 11525 LAKE CITY WAY NE DETENTION PROVIDED DOWNSTREAM. SEATTLE, WA 98125 • I TREATMENT FOR WATER QUALITY: BIOFILTRATION SWALE PHONE# (206).364-2200 II is FIRE DISTRICT: CITY OF RENTON, FIRE DEPTPARTMENT k3E GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY SERVICES .;) g lum so ELECTRICITY: PUGET SOUND ENERGY SERVICES ,orr SEWER: CITY OF RENTON BENCHMARK dSN sw aA9Y WATER: CITY OF RENTON ONSITE: SE PROPERTY CORNER ® GRADY WAY. ELEV. = 20.28 °` E OFFSITE: TOP CENTER BOLT FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED 20 FEET NORTH, e 1 i j I ! 53 FEET EAST OF SE CORNER OF 900 POPLAR PL ELEV. = 20.89 WO g PROJECT ARCHITECT woo 0, A S I • NDEX OF SHEETS • 3 THE DYKEMAN ARCHITECTS, INC •A5 <i y 17E6 W. MARINE 01- DRIVE7. i i EVERETT, WA 9829-161 ` SHEET C COVER SHEET PHONE/ (425) 259-3161 CONTACT: MIKE BARTHOL ® SHEET 1 COMPOSITE UTILITY SITE PLAN PROJECT COORDINATOR a ,e SHEET 2 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN SHEET 3 FINISHED GRADING, PAVEMENT AND CURBING PLAN 1 VICKI MORRIS CONSULTING SERVICES SW 23RD sr SHEET 4 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SEAT 18TH AVENUE NE ` ; / SHEET 5 STORM DRAINAGE PROFILE SEATTLE, WA 98 2b -- - -- \ - /--- -- - - ---- - - -- - - - - 1 PHONE# (206) 522-8057 SHEET 6 STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS- - SHEET 7 WATER SYSTEM PLAN, NOTES AND DETAILS VICINITY MAP SHEET 8 WATER SYSTEM DETAILS • SHEET 9 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN NTS SHEET 10 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PROFILES, NOTES AND DETAILS SHEET 11 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS • 1 - - A—NNNNAA \\Kcd2\e\Petro\97038\-A4.dwg Wed Jul 29 I :22:5! 1: e ,6,0. 3,6' e . 27-0' is t• 11 m c I-mom p J� 0 2 I� Q o ~ o r =_ • r i < Zb. D —I O Z _ O 1IIEII -� Imo' a ° ° ff m r m < • cn 'lad ° ° r i • kill . I7 a a,r• . r It © 11 ©DO � 5 K • 6 000001 I I p o . • • • { CI EVRON FACLITY FOR PARE AT GRADY WAY A�)OAKSOALE t@l �1:1111:1g rc1 n$ q1111 �� �11 ; R11 p61 s@ 1ae����a�1pl' • �1/1 I IiICASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C. p����"g� �a�,Ra��¢ NEC SW GRADY WAY & OAKESDALE AVE SW 1u161l.�Il�a'1a114 9 5 e. RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 11�° Bg 11 �_ • • • EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES fi 1. 8'pre-colored(light gray)split face pU. EP 2. 8'pre-colored(dark grey)smooth face CTU. 3. I'insulated safety glass In clear anodized alunlrus al storefront framing. NB 0 0 O 0 4. Preflnlshed metal gutter and doenspout typ.(green) Hthaltt 5. Indicates future sign by Tenant pR.aBx__— a,. B. Overhead door A q qq T. 1'insulated glass In clear anodized aluminum storefront iliFlart—_I In1IIIoIuIumIIII�I111111 I'�llllil� '!IIoIuIBIIIImI1IIHIIi Y B. Metal Roofinglass I) 4> - - - - g. Fecla Wter lal lyreen) —`irrjll-nt i —II'�,IiI� �1I1II— !�M� 0 16. Clear anodized(reenur storefront door _ _ _ _ _,,,�......... 11. Exterior metal door ° '� aio'i�■R^■ M■■1''n■■sc?';•j3sys;Ns?E■:'-._.■■C!''ilikk es 12. Exterior lighting MIN�E UEl xR_a.,III •"�1i'a�O, — .. ii■�? 11F. SIGNAGE CALCULATIONS cn ... e:oilEai%:a:a�:aiiwiin;atiiiiiiraisiiii ci l Eriltz iaiiiiif3iiissi eiiiiiiE 9iii':•'s.'�iie': • Q C�" 4 Facia Band signs 13'-13'x 15'-8') Area•186 sq.ft. 0 0 0 O 0 2 Logo Sign(double sided) (3'-6'x 17'-69 Area-122.5 sq.ft. L1.J Total sign sq.ft.• 302.5 s9•It. LLJ SOUTH ELEVATION 6 1 UB•-r-0•(F RIM 5 22 341 F f w e = A.Ai E�i l— �A4 ic Nam"• -- -. . , as>. 1i'II®II [16911I19MIII°IMIIII'IIII 11hIIIIIJl1HMIIIIIPI llMIII lIilI�IIIIiGI1111[1 hl 1111if II I�IIIIPIIIItlil16111111i�iied)0 � rs���.491-'— m Vusi marl e::ssuei - 1 214.E ::Li I iaaaesis iaxissa i-'w -sawsi:isus- esitr-'i:::su:s�sar•'• I�-- • •N,,7,.,a 0 0 O 0 :"O 0 O ■ "' Q O LAMP ELEVATIONS SIGN ELEVATION 0 i-- NORTH ELEVATION vs--ro•Cr IRN7 5 2z•a49 us••ro M 5•(F nc zza4•) r u3 j ne O u�� k5 0 O O O 0 0 I .ram-------r— — q Flaylskna � _ 11: ^I I!II 11I I 3 p I — I = raal'I�I _ ixavfeem { I: 1111b irir lhlor I °♦g I I i Illi ��Ii mnil! III IIIIill�ll�i I{I bVl'I!lCelne. . o � - Bali ldll�iIIQ11 II991i1�Illtosaiul I 1ij---1 I��II II GOA. 1111111111'till���,I �. --o , -!I� ,. _. . :tat= r s. . .._x 1i_s`r "/^iEa■■ :. :1 '''limas";■■;.-x.rs- ■■r.s� i�■ _ tartar 3E;i s..., � x"F_-f'• ^'r3r■ Eli., A:4:.....l ..dr:3:irir: ...-oAI:;i........'s'Er£•fl4" � g?f :iEiiiii t, li> iiEmia`-11c£7 Eiilv.iit?i9Fi'i4&I:ii9ifiii - - - - aSl��D1{" - _:� ...!eii�'C. r'i'izr'siE.a_ _[_lssiiii:saazu - Q 0 0 00 00 © 0 0 0 PmR+weca Poen.ar AV.B. EAST ELEVATION � WEST ELEVATION ��60. �e8yy� Ur-r-0•(F PRM 5 225317 hp 2 4�C. .m r>a>�n aPA I/B'-r-0•(F PRM522'347 4 024 8 6 AMC)A Ixavmp NI V6•-r-v 170e0 A3.1 7-O(i9 • • EXTERIOR COLOR LEGEND e6.u.1 N' al. 1 / CI 1S()OG .O rtlta.VW MY W1-00) 33� MART sex BY o �ffi[[19]!Z jy..«•...t1�X :!,Y :x.w-,. „`Ydy1,:.--5'd1L� �}I r �iy4 .t-.( e•1141I9UY fQAL DNRCiArWY-aW m�, ..g ,.i lac .:-: -• .. O r Food - art o,�N,re o ... 3 rota.9le®lanl O FYEinYi®ALA 0q taca.Pm�- .>_ .�aom., 4 p8 .880 sou sowenx If els kora it MD ,1 t 4y cY i .1 r,, °: 4 ,p1ty,.4 vi .Lt 1*1; 3 49 ZL''S NOTES {u ," ` Wr 3 r . \ :k•YA .`Jy ' 4F ;. Ose QQ r .. ,1'taC,;„ ,,.,-4.,s.,K 5 ..,g,,.A. .s_. w4„z,:... s, e.rvc 2411 • O$1 IPIXFl011934 LIWUl f4if84..99111E x0®Na P.LW MAY tO 1.1016�%a(LILIe ZOO WNW 8EAM1M1ImNLWMr0..a Q (n 3.rlLAq xel6,11.K.6rdII.9/01 11,100618 alM.61.APGSa.18.8 MIL FOR araMiEMxE J a EAST ELEVATION . ULLG 0IE NO NSAn WE.W11 9MLL6E PM/a 6E /WOO M.G181al RECEA 18.1M.0.1R•1{,m. JW SCALE I/4".1'-0' 0.�vwrNlrEAs s Q (qJ 6.9006..el c19wMMSTSO®FOf18x Q Z O I E-1.l•183 ALA _ 4 FyZ f S V =•�'c'`gt"��. 'a"m-.ter w), 0 6•u6x'Bura GAZING CALCULATIONS h-- >O i O - O IVP Mire TOM 61/4..A la BBM. Q I-Ad Q Fs 6 5.18aR YaA _as..9 MYNA,. (0> 03 GEiMJ®Atx ± = V ZQ1320m Rif 3 OZ jr. CSC >FZ e 05 sncca LVL Q¢Q ')�;E�a•vx - `xs 1 ,*'3'=,.r r art',-4„ sAx r*'v 2' i ar ,w,Sf W si L`f q '''; 66Yla Q(0 D 4r34 at ` s 2 ''tc V, 1. 1 `C'' .' i}.s ` f 'y rf.h� `r1 `i.' O Q U Mse'lPii'�wvx' ✓f.- ),+E.clY['s�.a Y4 H:wx f((Y...+fi/{+F/.tJi4 3Yi�.-. �i''i. '�EtA:' O snr�o Z Z - I ,wcl.e vie+ 1 O . NORTHWEST ELEVATION (SOUTHWEST ELEV. SIM) R m . SCALE 1/4'=I'-0' ®KHTLEY - COLE sm.,... Cc; - - - s.. n1 - - r, �� .....-x...-p{q lQilix-.. ._ ... .�I,,,,,,-- vr-7r ierF-t4(f..'+ 0 rMOT 6.1. y—r w 9 ..: O 10•M0E CSTORE ^ r !... . . . _ ELEVATIONS 3 rtEFx9®Acx ys 3 a 7/6/98 ^a1.e Mx91038-1 CAa.�.dM PUBIC 3 01 I. O s111.0 3r"" m m O 511.0o o if 5 •.4?? a R'4+fii.xt1 ; ` yy #i . d icR :1.f #s fi+ ( h J� 3 i•r,t a,E}`4Eie Efnd;)g., i a?gir us sE ° &nLiiiii;jag k i o O Mr. NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION SIM) vSCALE 1/4•_1'-0• ' Y d / • \\Kcd2\e'Petro\97038\-A2.dwg Wed Jul 29 16:22:19 pgp4Q y 6•-10• peL yTpTpQT F Q o ,-.- Si6Ki 1 9 44 4 4 "a fss s 1 —2E Rig 1 v."' , 1 0-6• tit , ...- ) r-cr t-74' 1 r-o• A u1 1 O I, S m s 9, i N q 2 r � m m O • i Z 0 0 , .b • �e• > r ; O /v . 0. d ^ '� �4 ti p \ i`. a. a. _ , I`. 4. h, a as L o > 4 . .,.,a1111%, \ Q \ , ti t ([-] r a ,,,, 0.,,,,,, p . WWPo} k',//' e•/ c 'b w I 1 I n 1 r' • • e I..-0. 1!'-0' F ix� ; ® CI-EVRON FACIITY FOR PERRE AT GRADY WAY ADD OAKSQAIE 01,1,11111 g1�104,1, � •x �n � (e°�l ; igii�e�gA48���S99�a�'�'2ax Z 1��1'I CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C. a���i�I��Hle�e��";1 G f NEC SW GRADY WAY & OAKESDALE AVE SW WI 411.101110°A 0 I RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 eeg° Ig el a • • -9 [--- - NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23- N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I.ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRE-CONSINU000N MEETING WTM Ott O 5'1 I ^ Di RENTON DEVEL(PMENT INSPECTOR. E h N 2.INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PADS AND MAINTAIN • CD ow THROUGHOUT PROJECT B Z ' • }^pQ B.INSTALL OLT FENCING AS REQUIRED. 0w 0 Y 1.BEGIN GRADING.REMOVE APPRO%IYAIELY 1000 CY. S.CONSTRUCT CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING DRAINAGE WATER -.ILO d AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS W • 6.VERIFY KING COUNTY 050/W'IP APPROVAL Or SYSTEM Y K® ~ CONNECTION THEN HAVE CONTRACTOR OBTAIN METRO APPROVAL. Q LT.} (/) I OF CONNECTION PRIOR TO PERFORMANCE Cr CONSTRUCTION. Z} J _ _ — _ -_ _ _ _-___— -I _ NOTE: __-_— - T.BEGIN CONSTRUCTION Of BUILDINGS Z O ,_ ^— I &CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE D CONTACT PUGET 50UND ENERGY \ I THE NEAREST AVAILABLE NATURAL CAS FOR ELECMILAL AND NATURAL GAS SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND DISTRIBUTION(2'e)MAIN IS LOCATED IN METER LOCATIONS. . W W , i^\ POWELL AVENUE SW APPROXIMATELY 500 FT f-I N \ /�� NORTH Cr SW GRADY WAY. 9.UPON COMPLETION Cr UTILITY CONNECTIONS 7II91 STE WORK to W O \ -///� WITH ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION AND PAVEMENT SUB GRADE PREPARATION. CC _ I - _ O W FNIS'ING SIT/OF(EVTOV __i i - _^ TO.KEEP ADJAECENT STREETS CLEAN AT ALL DYES a \ r '?A 1 COVERED VEHICLE Ate„®. I I / 11.CONSTRUCT WATER DUAUtt SWALLS D ESTABLISH VEGETATION W U WASHING BAY I I —.^ AT EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE. a Z \ WATER nH- OR/WA SEPERATOR I2 �•'• / I ^ O \ \ i-AIR F NF tP0 t,,o... SHUTOFF E% RIORLV / — I ��^ 12.COMPLETE fINISHEO GRADING.INSTALL PAVEMENT. N Q Nil.•�I].5? TBP 7 VALVE CONNEC \ / /- W \ 2(N E.I Y cae C t I , \ r '. Nv-�.U` UV.S. :UN:1// VALVE I "_ SANITAR SEWS ^^^_� ->/ _ \ O 11 CONSTRUCT CURBING AND LANDSCAPING. 111 I^ 1.OBTAIN OCCUPANCY AND UTILITY PERMITS. \ ,LA 1,1 LN Mf I.SSNl. // / ,) ^-- \ L"r N;LB j•�^Y I'�' 5CLEF \ \ .L JAI^cluT ^^ / \i)1 „ / --; ^ I \ 74 \` / Fz aW \ \ OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM AND r:� �+ .„mm •/�, 11 __ ' _ -1 Ln HOURS OF OPERATION W n'� \ CONNECT TO KING COUNT/D. /� ..�rM _ /r I 4 \ METRO SEWER•SET NEW Ws ,. \ \ WITHIN NORMAL CITY Or RENTON CONSTRUCTION HOURS U�+ a` \ \ SSUH,INSTALL RAP VALVE BETWEEN \'�'� �i� \ l �' 1 •�, ` LIKELY BETWEEN 2:COAM-ROO PM.UNLESS SPECIFIC PERMISSION e \ \ METRO AND ON SITE SSMHII . 61\ ' 1_ ` r IS GRANTED 8T THE CItt Of RENTON INSPECTOR .4�-���.��c fir± SG `. 'RJR} �`.,I: �r OBTAIN CITY AND METRO - .y.+ WSE m' APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION • "y-- or 1 I �,P b,,S�E0.ME' \ R., �; TMRA�AI POWE •nar"ak \ t_- DUST,MUD,NOISE MITIGATION Q 11 c \ \ \ �a'6-� '� �r-L9.0 ! ELEG;\I '. �•r-,�.W:Y'}`�' f ��•TI" IF GRADING AND COMPACTION ROTATES CREATE UNACCEPTABLE Te \ i ^^ _ _�^^ /(\\ /may PROPOSED' \ "�-r" iFW^�' LEVELS Of DUST.THE GROUND WILL BE WETTED FOR DUST T -� ENTERPRI CAR ^II';sue W��- 1 \ __ CONTROL.MUD N1LL BE CONTROLLED 1MTH THE INSTALLATION Cr - \ \ (5250 AGENCY i • �-':..f- ) r- \ `�'_^ - ^ RS CCNSMUCTION ENTRANCE/ENTAA P.AND ONLY LlEANINC. ... SOFT)-!`� EXISTING OVERHEAD PpxERN / ? N 1 i110 SOFT) • •s ""�;AS"f?fO 5" PARAMETERS FON DEVELOPMENT Cr A COuuEROAI SHE. ill Z % m -"_ LINES TO BE PLACED UNDESCROK .1 ...1, 1 / _ .i f _ _ \ �\ ` aK�_ fn XV ,.+ \ .W 10 FT WOE EASEGENT.�' i • IlJ'^^ ^ �V�_ _5•.' �, XL \.J- O -\ \ _-� . �' ' cB r•.air! qc+L zWr.. ', _ ,,yam PROPOSED HAULING/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ROUTES J\�' CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AND REMOVAL ON ANY UNSUITABLE MATERIAL m e\ - % !_�-. 1� ir/J ` ^ 1� ![\�` WATT !./'� /y/�" •^ I IS PROPOSED NA GRADY WAY.IT IS LIKELY THE UNSUITABLE 9Z.\ \,' /SBL" -mil \�N�l� -CATER' ' ••` \� \ \ "� NA NWYL WEL BE 16).GRAVEL FOR PPE BEDDING PAVEMENTµD THEN SOUTH flzi \ EnZ \ • i .•.�%-1( �� .M''�� "�'./ \ ` '- AND BUILDING MATERIALS WILL AISO LIKELY BE BROUGHT FROM THE E c_%" \ ' __-1- +' �• 3 jar C ,% '/��(��\ �'pT / SOUTH MA HWY 16T NORTH.AND THEN WEST MA GRADY WAY. ,I _ '•�•�WI ae, //� I/ THE SOURCE Cr MOST MATERIALS TO BE USED ON 1HE PROJECT SITE m . : .�� „O`E WAa.••,• PIW9J" 1110I }T°3i lli" �'^ q•r },\ \` :V� '' ^ RILL LIKELY BE FRO4 THE SOUTH. E / I¶E/ /, 7♦ IRRITATION IJE -AND D r '`I. s^S'j, �r' IfDaLESI)t,r,S4E�SEnyeI�W ESTIMATED EARTHWORK �� i {j^ YETERj ^ GENERAL STE CR.NG FOR BUILDINGS.PAVEMENT ----------A n��_ �‘ V\/5e6yi �Y i TEE g9f !! g \ e\� S �• TMiS DIP D NEW ME HYDRANT AND LANDSCAPE CY GRAVEL TO BE IMPORTED REQUIRE D APPROXMATTELY i A ! E 9 TELEPHONE RI li\ ::\, • ��► ! /J.- ---2...----"- .- ��TME CICOxNECTION TO EXISTING uux 335 CY Of TOP SOIL TO BE IUPOLTED.ANY AREA OF ME 1 9 66 E_ TT NATURAL GAS ETER I '�y STE WHICH WILL NOT BE WORKED ON WITHIN IS DAYS Cr ELECTRICAL PO R TER _ .s U �~ +', ^/ ' ^ GRADING CONPLETIONNEEDED) MUST BE HYDROSEEDED.TEMPORARY .\ �' S�Ay /� �� ^ VEGETATION(IF NEEDED)VALL BE MAINTAINED. I. PR ED\SON \ o. ' \� ' • "t AS4 • �.•� / •\ I. \ \ '\ •Pt // OR/WATER SEPARATOR p PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES 5 W1M E%iER10R SHUTOFT tl I \ �9yllTE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION LINES RUNNING / / M.E••- SANITARYNSEWER NECT TO EAST-WEST TOST0 BE PLACED UNDERGROUND SUMMER 1 9& Yn / \•\ ,' 5_ — Gp3.V EXISTING NORM-SOUTH TRANSMISSION USES TO BE RELOCATED 5 SPRING 1999.PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENT off SITE SUMMER 1998.PROPOSED LITOTES TO TO BE CONSTRUCTED CONSTRUCTED SUMMER 1999.OCCUPANCY TARGETED FOR e�'' ^ y\• 3/1'DOMESTIC AUGUST 1999. / `f' �e RPPTDE METER • , ��' �% / INDEUCE TOE BE / METER AN BETWEEN,CONSERVICE • • *\ ^ METER AND BUILDING.CONNECTION TO RET N N.MAIN BY CITY I / Of PON i \It./ \ \--\ I/ 1 _1 GRARIC-SCAL1-- - - .."...,,, ,,..4: I 1 .. AmerICon ETTNN•e,. • Planners • Su,.,srs 'AO 1��1 Corporation °^"°<u oemi " HatNEE CM em-Yua ram MO I.,-A I M 050,99 I 1 I 7-31 A-NNNNAA • • N;= _ _ _ _ _NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 _ ,TWP-.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 60'MADE ROLLS. IA USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH M g q II _ FABRIC TO WIRE. 0 FA 2'le UI WIRE 1. Use e'to B'guarr^T O0C ar crushM Fact.tar surfacing as.own. s ^N FABRIC OR EOUIV. Yoterw wiln en n t acceptable. IT LD w r 2. Tne 100' Ien9m ehml he Leonyfovea as e-aary to insure 8 z material 1-not o-«u<a mlo tee vab6a .71'1 744.."` ' 3 DROP INLET WIRY GRATE ygVypjeV. 0o STAxE I s^...k[lM5 u • J O i- STAKES 5•_g• t— T BURY BO111NF OF FABRIC EXISTING GROUND g O® FILLER FABRIC 2._6_ - MATERIAL IN B'BY 12'1RENCH 1 ga. Q 3„tea: 6G.•, r2 . ��tie• ..... g�pi�. MAX v, .oag..a;�' gtaF� Zay =~ WASHED GRAVEL FILTERED WATER FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 6' ES a CC Q Z y RUNOFF IMENT //r 2'BY 2'BY 14 GA.MIRE \ F EXISTING GROUND LO O0 M 1.; MiH SE01 ENT 1 1 W'YIN. 11.1 FABRIC OF EOUIV. •_, • i..•. •• (MAY BE REDUCED TO 50'MIN P I.caw 6W �!l'.,;44•:•�%%::+:4•VX•%%e�%: ''• 1-0 FOR SITES EDI LESS THAN 1 OCC In O:3`'1isiiei•:ei0•ieieieSie:eiwi•:eie:eieiei eP:`i si 12' 5-0. ACRE OF EXPOSED SOIL) i tl Z W \ _ PROVIDE}/e'_TS' R•2NMIN d Q d Z w .•.tie_e..A_...A...._._•_A_e_eA_e_e_aA...e_e. w WASHED GRAVEL BACKFRI. lY w } S TRENCH AND ON 80111 SIDES ' ¢La, FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON 8'MIN. f OZ W THE SURFACE. 19-y BUNED FILTER FABRIC 2'BY 4'WOOD POST IN YIN 't e I a CC B. ALT:STEEL FENCE POSTS. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE BODED. BITER FABRIC • BRUSH,BARRIER FASTING DRIVEWAY % AD�• EXTEND THE FILTER FENCE/VARE MESH BEYOND THE INLET OPENING NOES' N$ P15N RAMP OR SITE ACCESS o E 1.FOR SHEET RUNOfT OR FOLLOWING DISCHARGE TROY A ROADQ swung AT(EAST 18"ON ALL SIDES. Nis SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. W Z w PLACE]/e'TO}'CRAKE OVER WE FILTER FABRIC/WIPE MESH. THE DEPTH OF GRAVEL (.1(...0.411 -L•f• ton Win:Is/w 'c SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12-OVER THE ENTIRE INLET OPENING O B 2. IF THE GRAVEL FILTER BECOMES CLOGGED EDI SEDIMENT,DIE GRAVEL MUST BE PULLED 2.YpANUM SLOPE STEEPNESS PERPENDICULAR TO FENCE F 3: LINE IS 1:1. ME REVISION BY La DWG.NINE:BR23 SP PAGE BOBS AWAY FROM ME LPT AND CLEANED OR REPEATED. _ Z o. 3. AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WOULD BE TO USE THE CLOGGED GRAVEL AS FILL MD PUT 3.MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO F-r[z] a' FRESH GRAVEL AROUND WE INLET. tl Uri �� WE FENCE OF IDO FT. 6 4; U.IF 5ON OR LESS OF THE SOIL BY WEIGHT.IS FINE PARTICLES ' i E SMALLER THAN THE V.S.STANDARD SIEVE NA.200.THE EON SHOULD BE EOUAL TO OR SMALLER THAN THE SIEVE SIZE TESO NOTES • �acy,F'I THAT 85E OF THE SOIL CAN PASS THROUGH. 4 II .53 5 THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED MTH]/s'MINIMUM 1.BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OCCURS.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION Sag m.TER FABRIC FENCE DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL MEETING MUST BE HELD WITH THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,DESIGN ' _ INLET HARRIER ENGINEER. 5.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE E Z M1 m myy SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE.BUT NOT BEFORE THE 2.An Imrta of aleormg and mesa of vegetation presemaben as pinolSee on Q UPAOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. the plan OVAL fie decay gagged in Me TAR and observed darn➢cons4uctlO. ii. El_.-, Wlwd �•CT1;AV �MIt TEE 6.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY ].All required aea'vnmtatwn/moaipn control Mattes mast be constructed and AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAD AT LEAST DAILY DURING FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL operation prior to ME clearing and/or other construction to insure that am REMOH BY DWG.NAME BR-22A SP PAGE:B069.1 PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE cm....a F sediment laden water does not enter he natured drainage system All erasion uMEDUIELY, and sediment Ioc.ilies shad be maintained in o satisfactory Giber unli such tune Mat den nil and/or conatrucnan completed and potential I on- on •• y,R swam„yy site erosion has passed. The implementation,maintenance, placement and tIgi additions P to anion/aeammlal an contra systems Mall be the n pans 6aHy .. PALE AMNION NY F DWG EWE BR21 SP P/LE BO66of the permitlea.- 6a 4.The erosion and sedimentation contra entente depicted on um drawing m g• I >dJJ1�111_ L 1.,,,,," , intend..tie mNvnam requirements to II 1anticipated site conditions. a Y II '� 'r-T 1 MAINTAIN I I i I �e9� I I I �r EXISTING FILTER r - _ T. construction progresses and unexpected or sm CO nd:Hens dictate.the A I .�\�_--_• M°O n„m��'�i _�� - _ \ pmmdlee shall anbcipale foal more era and seemmtaHan contra I _�_� 1 ti:FABRIC FENCE :�)� N. lacaill<a wul 6a necessary to Nswe complete adtahm eantrtl an the ,, .. I - r I P��rWS,f Bpip 5 �� T- O proposed siie. Dung the cwrsa of construction,it.Mollceo be ins W.rn., •I SL I I W V. i I 1 / anti napmaIDmlr of the vermHlee m aaereea err ne.wnmuma Ina'mar be _� / __- --_ * created by his octidfiea and to provide additional'caddie;over ono above C_- __ __1_ ___pl_____ _ imam requirements.a may be needed to protect adjacent properties and water 9y g+ 1 tip B .� _t___.-__.___ ____ _if- ( �;�L— _• __ �' — ____ _ ___ __r-_ le of receiving Grano system. i 9 6 B i I I e' I .. , / / • - ��, — _ `___` -� :I r - v blAR9C 5C� quality ^^g g^ n ' f�.1 1 I�''� • 7 7 ® 5.Approval of this Ilion H for erosion/se..Motion contra any N does not O 'i� /, i I y I L__ _ 1 l T / ' cmalitula an approval al alwm dnno9e design,size nor latalwn of pipes. % - , m / r.15010s,.mOd;or retention fa0Aille; I • I TEMPORARY �RQIECT STING � I PRO ` / • m 1 CON�TRUCRQH S5ppN-yAVLT AND L ;EU¼ TART POSD NIENTRANCE ,-ACCFSRLRr I Aartd formera � `p pROOAD2TT L I E"Y •v I T.In any area Mi.has been stripped of vegetation and.mere no further wank ■•, _ _ la anticipated fora period of 30 don a more,M disturbed areas must be - --- - - �! -- -----4 1. .I Immediately stabilised with mulching.gross planting or other approved erosion -I{ 1.�11gryy■■■■■■ Iy'T-= - ^4 contra treatment appico6le to the time of year In question. Gass sewing 'I�_114`� � -_- _ H _- 6t����� _ `__w - �Qt�~• — -_.�-yam-=_-�. alone will be acceptable only during the months of Aptl through September _ � aGa/ I 1 IA'IC.Y •cB ® --"---- "�i£RJw ���� inclusive. Seedng may pnoceed,however,...ever it is in ins interest of the �v'M' \7 1 I -----'- L `o(cVI _ PROTECT EIDSl1N _ � permillee,but must be augmmled wan mulching,netting,or other treatment j �Triw� '�� __ PROTECT _1`i �-AL \ approved by the City of Renton.outside Me specified time period. 1 w.., ■ --EASLwC50�.____._- ___-�11 e --B,RRro„gwgI T14-Y91= _ W ' ,I �3 R`___L ( ` -4- &Few all 'on/sedmentotan contra ponds.her the dead storage depth aI , WiM LLT -- pg �__-_1 e•ceem 6 incite;a tmce,a minmum of}feel high la requ'ved,nth};1 side I ; �. .I� BARRIER exceeds __ - V - -- sHopea. Nerd N f 9.A teen enstmcrwn entrance,24'•50•K 8'of a-to 6-inch I a �/ ._.mz.— temporary grovel c PROTECT NE '� I r ,`I �j •�gl`\\ice - -- ----- -- - - -- - -a`arconella ells cd be alls.totaled at all polo!-o'vehicular ingress and egress la __ _ __ ___ 6. IUTIUTIES I 1�• - v -'----gag------- ail NEW-""_- _ _ UNTIL STENOpK ' , .�__ _—.. TUII�nERL-SVIEM6RN- I a __{V eC_ _ ICONPLEIE M ... I �.��1 I_ -—_ COMPLETE PORARY I— --` --- 4:� may,k�,�, II , _---''Ill......I _ CO STRUCDON = I„7 n• O American Engineers • Planners • Surveyors _ �1 • sW ORAOY WAY ENTRANCE '.��, Ifs:', Engineering �--� B_!` _--sE%roETn�--_ _ -_ -_ 1 I Corporation .a':nT: a semi�i� 'PROTECT NEW STORM - lr---title SHE. '• - - DRAINAGE FACILITIES- _ lE1E InKr¢(ice)ml-Tip yy I — _.-_— 1 �. EDON. CD F,-- i mews BI-i I F.L A—nN N N N A A ( i T ELEVATION. • ,�� l' " n - - NE -1 /4 SEC. 2-4 ,TWP.23 N ,-RGE. 4 E ,W.M. 9 """ """ s�'a E )r O.YIN ., B Z J Pa MI W uw Immz h x(OP)u O KO W- �a. I.. 'a p C7 5 1/2•• - G OZ m SAXWAuRiuOAPUE.NTER STRIP n• 4 ,® U B EXPANSION JOINT CURB AND GUTTER SHOWN 1/2•R A(Tm) �A3' SEE DETAIL'A" B aa Q 1"R 5• b./• vie HOWEVER. AY£BE USED. CURBS -3 ZC:7 CONCRETE SWALE W/ _ __ b �.� �iy _ _ �6 (EE.STANDARD_PLANS)__SECTION A-A_ Z T O Z FIBERMESH REINFORCING PAVEMENT 4 i.0 0.02 FT./FT. dDe CC Q 1/�'MIN ..4. 6" p C7 CL 1 1 2 MAX I /PT2rII LINE - CEMENT CONCRETE AI TFRNATE 7 •y''..A...... dSIDEWALK pa PPP rt�R ita�Pl a°1.900xn•1 LONE IL18" w LI, I TM.D.BASE Of CURB W CUTTER DETAIL A Z'. 8 7 1 2 WTH p 1-B, ,� w cm¢ROO A°•OIwROAoss CAN) Y�OTAORLOIRIDINC CURB (NA, I ODUUT m1S orn BE Pu®NOT TO¢vTru I V c/C uce THAR Ili c/C.WV suu - NOT BE LESS TRA1a OOS•N TOYUWST NO SHALL BE z-I/•"O®. SEE NOTE s n NOTE:TOP OF LIP AT DRTVEWAYS. 1/Y TRW.N°'+TS SRAM BE PIA®AT BAC,SDES A.1xwT(BEM.Owe)Or APPROACH. A ARO IN CURB/ TTER TO . � q@� FOR OR DR COBNYEIACET6119 APPMACH ... A coma CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS0x KR ALLEYS F AND 11J.EY9 p° 4. ALL!MATS SHALL BE CLEANED A.a APPROA04 sMLL NOT BE PO 0H A wM CHUB um CUM,BUT WV RE POURED 'got mmN z o;E , CONCRETE SWALE 2 CEMENT CONCRETE BARRIER CURB y CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MURALON ADI ANCOUM OAS 00 TT SROO CUR. e mmn.a E. 85 s NTS-GAS PUMP AND s NTS-INSTALL WHERE SURFACE s NTS-INSTALL WHERE SURFACE FLOW ' APPR0wO11n'TOOST TO RAT01 T�DTTOOATOO SSHTR/uIa+c RUIEt "'°"r'MPP E+ O Al.APPROACH H001.Rl BE ICU.mI TON DIE ORIVERAT/ ,7. 141.1 TANK FARM FLOW IS DIRECTED AWAY IS DIRECTED AT FACE OF Al.mom. DATE REVISION ,APPR'D DWG,NAME:TROTH BP I.AI: IE-I C4 e.\P. ISLAND PERIMETER FROM FACE OF CURB /:..r- CURB _ I II \ _-- A5 V `E \ \ N, A¢ AnTana A I/ I _ I . _'__' [ iE % ,i P Mr MO 55MI1 - Iq�IPJ(+ 1 _ - • �- - 3"COMPACTED ROLLED DEPTH .yl _M \ CP OF % 1dD t 5.12 12- TONG I/ ,E ,== lli �: _ _ —.1 B ASPHALT O SC Ti C MCTRO 55Mv. J P \ 9� \ To-.:oo u0 / / ___ -_ ` __=\-"p C COMPACTED/RNG T PECO \ M= Ot / .i• �—CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE { atA slat SCA1E n •s / e \ �® ADJUST RIM T, � 6 E� < _ !,� •� � I iimi 6"COMPACTED�ROLEO DEPTH tl •\ \ to \ F' T0,'omn � ei/3T� l - \ L ~CRUSHED SUR ACING BASE COURSE $ I� (fL aIt. "7„....-- OWS P' ,&1 ✓,' �/ 1 ADJUST EXISTING �(�(e'.('. ✓�✓/✓~� MAXIMUM DE COMPACTED TO 95% 1i SD RIM AND MA%IMUM DENSITY.IF COMPACTION � A v GRATE ELEVAnONs E Ap \ fR� \\ --ems,. r'"� '~a4ZFS9.0 1 I 1\ \ �;9i:iT. .t�- CAN NOT BE OBTAINED,ADDITIONAL •� _ _ �= •,,y-{ PROPOSED �yrly GRAVEL MATERIAL MAY BE REQUIRED. ....... � L ,09 ENIERPRI CAR \` 'e �--- ' \ RENTAL AGENCY .•'1�_: _ ��. ��^''''' i t PROPOSEDso --, /_ T --•����_ 'F ON SITE PAVEMENT \l (5250 f��l a SI -;_ ! f. \ FFuuiso s81- ��. _ .... G \ `, '�,. O NT5 \ CY ice r�/f}� .. 61 "1Y'. _ pr !p S TOP OF DARRN?yA ,)„,1` -L•. "9 r.0 'Ct� .. j� I I I d S 1 \\ \ STRUCTURE 15:J.A➢.a1Sr = ■ - wit/re2 -iiiik, 'J.y_ ''-- ~ A.CL•f55 NATO • ' 11) \ � -iy.- 1,�4 glr: _ sx DS ..;'r its �- UE 2:1 SID4 EOPEY�l- - - �t �,,p dr oµ)N LocATE swALE AS uucTi a /�" `1�•%\�I � Iit1,1. - NS ,I� �. AS P059B1i-ON PR.G¢7'' •Q i t \ `, f�`\ _ V' -.N‘ N1GN r a y ��' EL..20�' ATE p • kiallailliW• i /! �3'BREAK IN CURB FOR SURFACE CONSTRUCT C - CREIEEX � � ,T T , APP RI AY �- T '� \ �' D2"DEEP ROCKED SPIILWAYr TO M1DE E 4,1'NIS`(EETi `,\\4 \ . _ O �� _ / BOTTOM OF WATER QUALITY SWALE. WID1H AS MCICA�D 1 ` �� 0 RIM GRATE COSTINGDO USE 2"TO A"QUARRY SPALLS. • '\ �' ,�£i �j i i/ ONCRE EIEVAT10N5 le•t' t - / £L ! CONSIRUGf CEMENT CONCRETE \ �' WA� .- ' SEEOR DRIVEWAY E DETAIL ROACR F4.THIS SHEET Q /A. C v i 040TD AS INDICATED - - - -_ __- _ _ __- -- _ _- -- _ _- ___-_ -_- - _- _ �_ _ I \ �. �'A` •i �i -__ - _ __ __ ___ __ - - _- -- _ -_ - {V LEE ' I \ /� ` '' � ►:14ti. Amer.-. ETgIn«n • ATOTTOn • Surveyors / 'iv 11 IT y';('IIITTT--- = Engineering DNS /�/ A CONSTRUCT APPRO%IYATELY 2601i •1�{fl ;,' rP�rfl!'IOn wi°,"ma'0"'I� �•A CONCRETE S SEE DETAIL WALE U AS ROUND PERIYETEA ,.• AHD. / OF POMPCONCRETE ISLAND CONCRETE E ERAB (Eaa)mI-Taw Pw(Rm)aei- A� / /'�' `, 7/ CONCRETEER SCPADOT SHEET SLOPE TOE I cams T )-�11 I I I�I I I I' Y I] OIL/WAIER SEPARATOR A N N N N A • mob- NE 1 /4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M. E n Ch D ' iQ ¢w DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOTES Jp z STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION NOTES RIM INV NOTES O® d - OWS dl PIPE INC.5106-S(OR EQUAL) 17.3 14.3(6") CONNECT TO P VEHICLE LOAD ACCESS HATCHES SANITARY SEWER € as Ewa oWS#2 PIPE INC.5106-5(OR EQUAL) 183 153(6•) N TO STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES ¢.3—Q -_—__ __------_ _-- -VEHICLE_LOAD_ACCESS-HATCHES_ SANITARY-SEWER- - —- - - - z 5- - CONNECT TO AND SET I.RETORT ANY CONSTRUCTOR Ct DEVELOPUENT ACTIVITY OCCURS.A .J CO#1 TYPE II 48"0 16.2 10.5 STRUCTURE AGAINST EX.SO VAULT .PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING RUST BE man PM THE CITY OF C.2 Q RENTON PLAN REVIEWER. NJ m CB 162 TYPE II 48•0 17.3 12.1 2All construction snap be In accordanee with the•1994 Standard Specifications for Read.Range and Municipal Construction'prepared by W&D.D.T,and the p Ord CC O CO#3 TYPE I CO 16.7 13.7 American DeDmtmeno Public encsworka.Association(APwA),as amended by the Oily of Realm • to &The surface eater drainage snlen abet!be constructed according to the Q a6.9 14.3 CB�4 TYPE I-P COCB approved plans Mi.are on fee inthe Department of Pub.Work, Any 3 Id devotion from the approved plans will require writtenapproval from the City of R OZ INLET#3A 12"CMP N/A 15.2 INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, Renton Deportment of Public Works or Surface Water MPH, SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 4.A c0P9 of these approved pans must be an the job site whenever construction INLET g4A 12"CMPCe N/A 16.6 INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, I,n proress. SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 • MSTaLL DEBRIS BARRIER, &Datum anal De RAW BB.unless otherwise approved by City of Renton s. y OUTPACE#48 Tr CONC. N/A 16.2 SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 DeparMe tment of Public Works. Reference benchmark and elewtwn me noted on N o5 INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER, m operation to demo rr-r'z OUTEALL 14C 12"CONC. N/A 16,2con 6.u1 sedimentation/erosion facaluea mwl be prnar q Op 3 SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 anasbuaainq ruction;ansWpcs'rona�d NeYpotent.le f�lis(actaa�ma�la'neapassed. E. >"Z = T.Alltelentim/detmlfon facilities emust be nstdled and in operation prior to F W - s ( min conjunction with all construction activity unless oMer.im approved by U C>~ ore MOI R Nan / ,\\ \ _ -2P ix I I1 / /*nr nr`' , 1 /T- G) / f' __ ANDGRe_ () \ V / , -- I \_ _. - I I %Ail pipe and appurtenances shun be laid m a properly prepared foundation M SEATTLE METRO SS. T - ccadmce with Section 7-02.3(0 of the cummt Slate of WaMinglm Standard u y[ \ ptAPMC PALE ad �. I:� --JW/YrA'TER SEPARATOR/Z,/�' - 1 -__%�r 0 Specification for Road and Bridge Construction. This snag include necessary y \ \LL \ 0 I Iv-1t rn /' - 1N E%1FRIa2 SNUTOFi// - _ �' leveMg of the trench bottom the lop of the/wndat.material asua as To I\v i AiC'SS VALVE CONNECT Ts ; _ -_ 'L 1 nO, \ / placement lend c of action of repotted bedding matmwl to uniform grade se that _ O lnli-1�tr'+ia +r I �/ ��SpNITA'Y Sjp' 6 / L< / entire length the pipe Ina be supported m a uniformly dense unyielding r• \ \ carp' na'� 1 ■ �� ._ -. I \. ` / on of PVC pipe. All tre base AP nch bark Ssshall beon be canP«led to WA Class Amin mum 95R foe. r pavement and lfp \ ' \ r-, r+'An nmo1 1 1 -Ir�;4 i _ I •\ 74 structural fill and 901a otem.ise per ASTu D-1557-70. Pea growl bedding Mau Y L \ 1\ : 1 S gg\ be fi'over and dunderTOI P.V.C.pipe. 1 \ ET 1 �l :;etl fP 10.Galwnized sled pipe and aluminized sted pipe fa all drainage aihm as \, \ GR -_ _>= /_ - ' `\, I �-.�1 - --1 / \ �� Man now asphalt Vestment n a Dauer name and outside. E� \ ADJUST IX SD VAULT- �i` ''t' 11 BUJ�5T RIM GR \ Il.Strvelures Mall not be permitted within TO feet of the spring line of any t hi \ O \ ACCESS HATCHES \ •/�l� 1 ELEV.1&1 slam drainage pipe.a 15 feet from lee lap of any channel bank, TO ELEV.17.D p PO- ,y.D ..� a..—' R _' i -�j T`1 PROPOSED• ` .��� 3=s A� \ 12.Ag catch basin grates Mol be depress.0.10 feet bdaw pavement level. / /�1 C ENTERPRSCAR ( V1ic �.• \�.s-�".--..-.-------- \ 1\E, flENTAL A NCY ,�� B'-'r IJ 13.0,,cut road crossings lNaugn existing public rgnl of my will not be '_- I \t PROPOSED (5250 SOF _� �'� criMed unless specific.%)approved by the City of Renton Administrator. v 1 1 391URE SPACE ` i, \ +'` Department of Planting/tlundmg/Public Works. _ 1 1 440 SOFT) _ .ASr GRATE .,-,..,. ..,. \ �, _ -, \ ''T 1 \ �• AO E ClE1L-1f \ \ 14.Rock la erosion protect.of roadside ditches,where required.Moll be of _ \`^i \ /: :� �' ��� `' -iu J sauna wormy rack placed to depth of 1 loaf and Mal meet the follow. ! MIX gp B \ j __�/� A=�a CD p6(WV J SWy,Lf �� spear...ions-4-B' 0X-70X i A I 6 f Q_._�a- ,.�-�C�2 ilik - v_y5(E%) �/. �µ1%Y ''/' y !1 rock/10X-20F pas ya paaang:2--I'rock/JO1C-s0;passing:m -2' --r—\ 1 - :611 �(p � �__.�_ N - \ qA' % ,/` \ 15.uI ewamg downspouts and footing groans Mal be connected to me lam \( __.-- �yl ,V�� �_ / / i drainage...tem.unless approved by the Department of Dewlapmenl Service; \ '" SO Plan Reviewer Surface Water Utility. M accurately dmrnaioned Certified a I g • \`v- ft �fa' 7/I� ~ ADJIIbT' AND GRAZE 'I 7 /`� bun drawing of this drama 1 T De submitted to the City of Ten. /' i r drainage system '\ l is}s:�'� `a ="PTO ELEV.18.1 . / ` .- /- upon eampletim. a �"" ,• -:n WAR • �� I6.fi /'l// '�'' lfi lasuanca of the BuadNq m Construction Permit by the City of Realm does g J Mk F ``�' Ya� O 5.2 9p f 54 i ,f i i owner e continuing legal obligation and/or liability lr" not renew Me p al mlinuin i S s•'/' 2 — INLET 4A �/� onnected with slam surloce water disposition. Further,lb City of Renton d«a not accept ant obligation for the proper functioning and maintenance of the '' f `sr \ /� /a''i25� system pravnded during construction \ \ �_ ;� % .� itk 2 6. / -4r&4C ............ I7.Tha Contractor Man be respangDle far provWng adequate safeguard.safety KKK"' devices.protective equipment,Mag.and any other needed actions to protect \ •�- O��� .ix / /% S BREA%IN CURB Pot SURFACE Ine life Rm�lh and lb Dmfsafety rmoance o(uwoh cod to wredprotect Ib property My work ' j pRA1NAGE FLOW.CONSTRUCT J' connection Irq ded rye%of.ay tof may..we pl ham.bolo flow Mao ,\````{ ;rt�el�`�`,....7. / WIDE,12'DEEPROCXED SPILLWAYTO BOTTOM OF WATER require an apOrawd Iralfic<mtrd plan by Ina Thal!En9�euinq Diviim of \'''\,, " '� / ' USE2 TO WARRY SPAALLS. the Department of Public Works All sections of the WSD.O.T.Stand. 1— j // 5pecificalima 1-OJ-2J.Tra1Rc Cmlrtl,M.I apDIY. W_1 /YAIER$EpARATIXLn-- - - - -p_ - -/`- WITH EXTERIOR sNutafT - - - ----- ------ - - - -- --- --- - -- - ------- - -- - m 1 Gil VALVE CONNECT TO iy LEEO/ g`N SANITARY SEWER p R \ �' �' Amerloen Engineer • Planner • Surveyors • ' /" -/� .1Y Iv , Engineering f u A a \ 'T 1 Corporation Pram,eA 9°0S' %44;eLwYt;01 Pw.Cam)MI-Ma / �� 7-31-96 A—NNNNAA • , . \ NE 1/4 --SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,RGE. 4 E ,W.M. ,............. rg? P -_ \ 'rr '1,...:--- ________-----•--- i::: \ etatnaKalbalWal WATER PAl / I - ..---------- 1 \ 1Walataltar TOP 170/ . \ o SYMBOL-5 CAL,WATER SEPERATOR 0 CATC11 BARB O Ss moms 1.2.0 MUT i.6'CO. BLOW OFF V• VE TOP OF VALVE 11.22 - • - - . ; • • - - \ --__ -.--:7. ......---- _........ .--...... __----------- ---------- g \ A .WATER SAA19710LE ' I \ \ \ \ EF2 SIGNAL CABINET .0 FRE tiTORANT 74 RATE VALVE O ELECTRIC 50x d' BLOW OFF VALVE mune we=60.1M VM1.0011610 pywof __.-------- -------. A.-I"-____--- co . --..-_-_-- ,,,, , ....... ---i-„, `7., ...- , Z I-(1) <U 1 -.:.21-200.,,,.----__.---:-...- .6_.9 012(SNAL GRADE ELEVATION* NawarrY.0.1.86 - exISTriS 5,!CONDARY 0,710000•\ \ (SPOT ELEVATIONS) ADAST 'f 7.0.: • DRIVE POWER unte 00 Be 17(.1RED 7).42007' ou L/GLIT POLE e , 0, _ ACR055 Tne 51173. L_Li i\ B WATER AMER / „....• • . 4\_„...-- \ I- ..:,_ , ,. ...._------:-:---------,.........- , -.A•0 CO ,,.• ,,• . ./ - 0'17000210 - SETBACK \ / '''' N \ 05, DRAINAGE,00EC110N OP SLOPE 11\ ..,„. .11-5-.. .05 dre/r 5,_......95 ----.-.-- .,-3..., 7 . - --) --.- ''. - t•' ...----7,-LE,14 .r- .... -- ' \ - .."'" / \ El- IA '. ' wilL".\""lirli emOTNG artlin6AD MAJOR POMER 7.11,070125.1o1 B >-- n g , . .., ,...„..r.„_. ,. ..... ... ...._____._-,-,,..c- 9.0 ..._ v....." 0 . •-c,1 ' -s-----:-'''-', ',,..,. ,..6,•....- „t\ \ ,..1),11,6. . ,....-s 1 § _--- ‘ ___-_,-_..--:-__:------ ,_..,:_-,- .. ,, i -.e--. ..,,-1.-!t6-q". •,•ku A__-- ,,.. •-a, - •if- nrorii, t..e..4,, /-----4------ :I: ,,,---- _. _ ___-___,-, ,, , .." .. •-- i.i.. -->.- •-*,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,14,z,.,.,,,.\ -,,,5.• I.:-•..- 1 ,..'''''..s........... • ,e. .•, . _._ 7.4 ,1.7. ,,,,ATS1 IlL ,, FER„.,--; b .....____-.................. _,.............-2,„---__;------'-....,, ------•--- / / )' `.1. . ...' . • ,• 6.7.11))...',77)'7 SAO f, --)1)'71, *-----'. ' --- '''''7- ma* ' ....'...- ...._ Ata ,a a 2500 -.AV,''...0 . 4---". •• a. ntIgNielk. , a;VI ' ..0 Ill' i '1\10 1 ..---" ---"_:-.---------: -----.---- //'/ '' A. • , ,1v.'-,,,•.1.,..,•Ari..gz•on....4..-_, •,f.„....---,---. .*,:•'-ohr, • ,v,,;.._ •10. 15-100...._014 . ..-_,--,._ ___-- _____------- •,•, •,,, ....r...::: 1_,,..,...viel•,,A4,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;•:;;;;--, ',,,,.-i.T....::--.4N- 1000- ---. ... - • ,‘,....1.-wr F40 \ \ - 8 ;---- ___1‘•--2...."_....---\_--- . , : A-p-i_._- ... .-•,..;;;...........Itto•%--olttp„.....- ' •• _..d.„ ., \'..,- I . ------ ---.. - i --- ....4- \ . '..• ,4 . ,r i • - -‘Z, . --f _-, - - tiolttrAya_, „„Tikrier., • -...• . 0.„,,,A,' \V• c•--'• - "1 a e _----- 'ci\ ,..,9,• / / •_._ ) , %1.--____711,,c!. .,_----•___A•7.7.--,---,:-7.--.;0•1011114: .6...=10''', .,•....'.'.;.;";.i t -IN ' apv, n ' -- '-_,....- e _______ ---t-- ,,, / /___Lt-__ f.;..,:a __:-......100e41,-,,,,,. . ..,:;-•,• ....L. .. -.tor • .....,-....,. - 0_..---. ' --- \..,, ITT- ,:_.----_-_-_,_-_- ,,..-„,x--.... ,,,16. ...,---,-- N:=1.,.e... , 3...„.K.: .-.--- - 0 0 .... _.:„___-- ,, v,,,,_....L..11. - •• .,,,-1 ••-•'.ist.PIO°- • --A.. 4,:,,,.... . __ 3 .. .- „ , ,21....,..„,•_•„. .\-v .,.. ,3, . ..„,..t,o, :-.------ . . ,..• „„3_ ,,.....01, „,..0- . . ..• : -, . , ... ,. . . ------ •• - 7.110-:70-;100r-tost--\---, ,FV.A A-k-t- \• - ,....-.7%- --Are,. . ___-- . , ,. , '-•-'1-.5-,------_.- . .----',!.•11 . wilk-•,,aindfiliiit .1;\:.: •-•\-c-.1-•!,\••t7•.; - ,.4711‘ ..,•••• -' -------"'"-_,_ \____ .__:...;:...:..-__-i________._ A•L.L1912•ALAFER ceABT SECTO70 LL.L... .....-----) $.4.--- ligliliV.r,: ,.. ,..........:ILL,,_..,21r.))'..m,„troX1./. 0. 117 ‘ .-0-_,,,_, '- 1,06. •. .0.001.45.,0 -- ....- LU 111 • PI. . lin ?v AtOrd ..,, ...• ---------- ------- ------- 1-- I 1 Velt 774111#1• ...‘;-..1i7-.1 ''. °' V - r',tre.'7 .0•00...16.1 .,",,. . --- ----i"----- LL1 < ,.. ff. . Eu... J. .... 4,..: •A , .bb LU--,......1111 •.--Air .,--......2,05.•:-,,,ot .. -,..,, /I/ . ______-----------___...---------- ,.,,( i • CL_--- 5ITE PLAN NOTES oz 0.)kr1 ,..• - ik •. Iry ...,,.....---•-•;5; ,-,,,, . • •. ---_2:410, ••- -- ‘2.10.-(*IN ----- 1.13 ILI 11_1 0 00 . 1. IndiCates bui'Ong OUtline a-)--- V-- 3. Tank(arM. 12N 4 ___ N.S) wr • APE EOPI4 .11,1t,..... 'PeA Alipt, 0?-....:-'. f,l'i,; ,i0„, 4. TraSh EnCIOSure 5. CanOpy and gaS pump loeallon Lx_ i• ,5,1•!ZCI\y- ,,.;,,,,. 70'LAM:SCAM B SEC 1\4.1'." )...,Ii"1-1 -7.-.1- • ...‘59' • fiAgralli --- Tv 6. Min.radtus 2'at curb unless otherwise mdicated. k..7. Enterprise street signage %dr,•, SETBACK\ 4 % ' . , w !!!-• \ .------- 8. New contours g 03° 9. Existing contours le. CteyrOn Street Signage 8 SITE PLAN INFORMATION F i 2.74 Acres•119354 sq... 7. Parkinn PONS.: • 0 Sa.lt. Revisions 11.) IC o"1 a7 C'e n"w ee O Si e'n:ee LS Gt oa;e-S/'Ca a's"Sr Li a'at:o'n n;a-r k 1 n-g r 1 O'p Yk.!n2p.'shl ar 11 I s'l p5;olFsi'e't o W. Dale Description 3. Landscaping square I Dotage: 5 0 O. 411111‘111'10).,,14147\k‘ .1044 1:27T;A;TO1111111 - '''' Natural Landscaping(or Wildlife. 6590 spit.(5.5%of site) Enterprise Car Rental/Saresr(w/o expansion) 48-9.-r standard stalls 34-9.-0.al parked stalls _ - maintained Landscape area, Total square footage of Landscapino: 23013 so.fl.(19 3%of site) 29503 sg.11.124.81 of site) 12-23..0.parallel stalls 64-8.-6'compact stalls SA't• 4. Euildino square footade: 1.-pf;1;g722p=:L Convenience Store/Gas Station buildrag. 13135 BJ1. Total Proposed parking:(w/c expansion) •-g. , Enterprise COr Rental/Car Sales bulldtogr 5250 sq.11. Enterprise proposed parking:Or/expansion) 48-9.-11.stanaara starts t ewsrm POWER LNE Enterprise Future Expansion, Total bullorng square Imager . 4480 5.11. 11035.1.11.(9.3%of site) 34.q•-41-del parked stalls 1- 10-23.-0.parallel stalls , -§. ..-------. 5. Pavemen same'coigne: Existing Impervrous Surfaces: 0 sq.11. 44.8.-6-compact stalls 2 -12-0'handicap stalls . A New Pavement+ 74415 mit. Total Proposea parainpi 6/expansion) 146 parking stalls proposed -E \ _ _ __ \So, .. POWER RELOCA. Nes EiPesaisi New Building+ Total Impervious Surfaces, 4101 sg.tt• 110 5 soil. , 89751 Sti.ft.I75.2%of site) 8. Al townie building neienti 9. Plop°.Wilding nelenti NIA ReaeCt Brectet_ Approvecl By Building-setbacks required by code: 11. Proposed building Wanks, MU!, P. • 6. 'E'rett'n'albrone'Gtore/Gas Station, 5 stai is/WO sq It.0 builOing 5(1306 sq.ft./1009)-6.53(7) 12. Current zoning, 13. Proposed coning, Co-COAERCIAL CFPICE 1M-SOAR GOUSIRIAL ROBOTAnovtect 0,eckeo By an fa' 14. Construction type. 471 JR Captain ...On By a . Enterprise Cor Rental/Ca r Sales, 1 stall/SX0 sq.l t.of sIte 2• 119354 sq.B./5000.23.87(41 sPA SITE PLAN Enterprise Mice required parking: 4.5 sta115/1020 RIM.ol buiidina Project no. Craysng SW- • I"-40'(F PANT 6 227(50 .44 Enterprise Future Expansion parking. 4.5(5250 smft./10001.23.63(24) 4 4.5 stattert=Se.11.of Bolding 97050,57,118_0_sg..ti,/10C01:20.16(211 A1.1 BILMT.C6CAAB 5Lf1k0_,(10_717in_IP(12107_z) (6,2 me2 , InT=InP (Vie:ggViV /6 parking stalls rentilred • iNNN . 0-24-15 • • . LEGEND ---- Ci MER TREES ys - __ - -- _mnsEZwe,e- -- - - AMR...,20 suMTr __-_ T_ -3.3_. __ -_ __ _--- - _ -- - _ -_ -___ _- ___ -___- — - _- _ coMNERCIALUNOSGGE➢UNTINGNOTES . .C.CED. IMsu:.uTAT.5,a5T. t A. INPROVEMEN w TO START xD1..APE WORK WNSE1Aw.M ALL MIEN SUE ,ill �l�.�t ] •, O AVOCKUSTURBMG AM 1232.1-21ES ``'V o...H. runs snV.TNA O.a.3 ] A. I i Wi4t USE iDR 15IS OVROuviTYAMnSEAUTION W311.£EXCAVATING TGEUERAL CDNTnACTaA—ONNEN DE ] 1 .O v.[.Mg4 .uA°suuTw s u A�N,N'w CONTRACTOR ur4rtIEA M1aumNeERvvE wul�,aro+a..ussl '��]"'�-'gyp:":A __ °• �D o WAD w NATER.UNT4EeMLasPECTIONAM DFSic CozsL'I:T.a�r. Y v2srtARmocEOw SHRUBS :. Te CONTRACTOR 51441.,euE RESPONSIBLE FOR E2vrEnsPSPi SPECIFIC c332.22nEs.5°4.C2D°YNOa T]a 21 i . \\.\\orto.unowuwn Evis«uruw a ]:a. • sfi2mnE UDuw.MPTANTwG DiSTNCES/ssvEC6iEDeELOW aTHESENOTES ® .uepxovusx s.uTA .T ].a ED IN AN u.IERAITRuwGUI.R SPACING gATTERNAi T. \ g S�ESSMO.1°A BE .g."37PLAN re02": 1251 PLANTW(s ANCE°R s]Wl Q w su.w.rtCR...... 2.24 Nu.sTIC......... ss swt fp uMOM CENTER OF TREE03 6 r TO CVNe,W°N.LMWAV.ETD.WNW.PLANTING OISTANCEdw1BEE MO UM. CIENAT, 56. �'° ESENTEDeersv]®«SWITMEpUWlN6L BE RESPONS1ECE FOR °s'IdfWTHEOWNTITIE50EMNTsnNTME 'lai1 nTMa,.,oTN PODTA SPROVIDEDeVOT.ERS p- 31 p .Enm,Suwv]mD aT«auDu , LAa _ a NNI:..4-6 TOBE,.TRaaTERM«TOP SOM1aA11P..NTa6BEM 3b 2 • ® .C.,..uee uv.n ..w:.LV.T.NP. s SO.0 / �'— \ . Tuw..u.rDE,.WINTERNuc TOPSOIL aAu1,.aN.REAs. , rys t+i GROUND COVERS •• - - ,A MnnuwiDEPm MAD onouo EAaLMucNaALLptANTaoIBEDs aE i� WYMAN II.ALL RAW N"R�sECS"OLLBEfERTIL 0 WITH AGRDTR.NSPUNT FERMI.42TPei f , x n$ ...7.J TN«2NNw� .EC..NE...� • .. 433 "_-- - �/// — \ ALL PUNT NATERwsNULCO.WARN TOA IeTAN]NRDS FORM]RSERY STOCx LATEST I i'\! — z�"EaTI6NMY ' ` ERN.C.PT.oa. . .R..arm -� r "'yb S a R All.1.w.r.NN.awS 5.53132.323232.13.23.4.a.0..P.N..a..M, is ;' J'oPaaPO1L .aTOST°.M,LDSw.VW sm .R.x -� �r - — w4lo l.,:.:�m 4ant.pTn.rn,.n a wa,.w we.e.v..pro....031.4• \ mow•...I,. S�.T.:.. 222..0.tray*4 branch.v. j _...__ _ _..._ - „ YTc •j t� y'r, ..Om.I.A.pw...:a..nw....o-..w�....m.�...:p�w - J,' _ \ s -/ -- '' >TT.d, 1y> A '— +r i '$.. AL AN.:�Px.2p meo:,.:..me.n ..:a.,....omu usrmnioris b..o.. 1 Z `'� _Ir - 1w,_ s"Sy 9 1 ''��� 2 m'.p�h'��„I.e.°o .�e.a....b:�.No SDeSnTOT OR C.R DrERM.N6S 3 4� - _ L?�W «,�• lei t05/- Tr_ An PR.enwosasr -• __. � _lb- •rV vrs,�ra°BEL�D mEES PRonDEOAT]e PRP.M.pm'i°L. > ..... _ - ,4*Q3 vt or,,•? ---stor Li lk, sn IN D EE6 DPSARTD.EETST ND RD��s�� T» g 13 a' \ -,T- - f'1� 9 IiI wpm- rrl is:....^'� Awr�iNG 63-31DR ALL ws.W]..99 POPx.UPTO a.30.E.ONmaE Swa12.1\ / / — s`TO: - i `- C er . �:FA.]... USEO ONs` " m o S PERATwN.N aR16An31.«" s�Co°REED°`"�/— / I i'F,3 el I.� 'r• - e';1.'•s-4.IniCT. t + NO, .::SNO EMSraGVEGETATION ONTweSRETO T•R VE 1 �l• / • b • ` ' m s• z [qt ', \ I .1 Tod=.'atrrs ;� )c. . • .—�r� d " s \ ie- r._ / _ • or 'c A- i. t •L: '''"""" '' :rsp '{ , Tl�i L , 1' �.-� c — • 3s 1 \ •� sl.▪ ,, 5,•.3 S,�'.��ayf. `II1 ' .►,• ' ��iL;��C,� \ ' `-- i a a-_ r _ u ,,t!`,,, •\)1 'ri '.. 1• .�t °�4,1 iiro-'eye 96�. — r- =6. ,�•^ --I� T'4 �' �M' •cm X` o f.../,- • i i y:'a�x.f,.00 a;P� 2 Nts2 '' ,•'fI t'.. "zr9. ' V 5 \ .A ''.. w a``} IP' E0. P� Q O rf 0 Y CL h °' -ED- 51TEPl AN LANDSCAPE INFORMATION • / 1. Total square lootage DI the site: 2.74 Acres 119354 sq.l 1. EiveroL_ A7 / 2. Total Landscaping requlreo: 2i of site•2387 sq.It. _4 1 \ 3. Proposed Landscaping square footage: :,a•.ar. ' Natural Landscaping Ior IUI Ile: 6590 sq.11.(5.57 of site) Maintained Landscape area:a: 21916 sq.lt. 04.5%of site) ° Total square footage of Landscaping: 27403 sq.lt-PLOT of site) ' 1of1 • i1 c.3..) 0 2'p1 G orro• FLOOR PLAN NOTES lid 37•0• 52•-0• 30.C CiENEWL p012,0 11 1. St equipped for handicapped use. g 9�,E 3. Steel el c locum 3. Telephone electrical panel 4. Telepof o panel •-0.5'4' '4.54' -.4.5.4'4•0' 16,0' 10,0' 5•-4' -4.5,4•5=4'5'4• •4'5'4'4••O• 5. Line of overhang above. A i3 d B. Dowaspoul from scupper above. Connect to storm rater system 7. Concrete sidewalk B. Planting area.Refer to Landscape Dogs. 9. ' Sidewalk ramp T O O 10. Garage entry curb cut out 1 Air condensing wits �� 13. rater neater +� Handicapte Parking {C�' v _ ,:... \\ 15. Gas Meter m `� ! I r�. ,: 1 15. Electric Deter Q U Ikr u7i l:✓ I •fir"" p T 8 30. Da furring•24'o.c.Insulated with 3 1/2'fiberglass I I '5 t L01 lZF110E I��.rY ihdt1.1I I Batt Insulation covered with vapor barrier.furred roll W Y \ Room I ,nF _{ .-T i. anchored to 011 with expansion anchors leaving 1/2'air space >Q i I I�•;j;.r; .;fl �„ between 2x4 and 011 wall.finish and GIB to be provided by the l,r`T.-, tenant. E h T I I��,,°.}II Y 31. rood window sin. fl ! d{ n "; I 1 { I 14 II.Id' L �, WALLS r W Y e. cIDSEp 1• yy II, �IIh�I �� � _ '^. 40. B'041 finish type per exterior elevations. h p !Ir . OPEN ri°- ilA'- 17 ' ._. eld1:llfl�4 11 n i >�A' ®®!S tik MICE'S I .•1i. "� �n': rc . 11,S�I;�,f�rp.', I a1 • / , 1 6;'„; r e II b I :ia •,,o,...11 ' ' �' " © 1.1:11w0m3xx®7010668owV 5 �!i, �: ;Y'l I 41 :" 011 . r tT, -1. OFFICES �I(F„"�?+ _,"'tl0 o e�z `� © I „�i 1..10141/0111A ,,,e-cr,, tomtit,3. T ' �r';' NM: _� Z ILI n y;:Fjr'I a$ ill T Q k, v R ENCLOSURE 7�;1; ! 4 ODUMPSTE aU U = G. 111 (3 iy Q :1.4cwu xnax < a '-Ot,5•-0'j'-1'p'4•!'4 s-4'3'4 f s'-.• 4.•5.• R-0• 4'B•,S`-4' j.•4.5.^,•3'-4.5.4.�.4.5.4. -0. ` 6 U --- --- --I �! - --- - I -� ' •So s eN mice cmuwv4 - 0 �• .•cad;sw P ..4Nil, 4 1 OENCLOSURE SECTION NI Car m°° N2eCM2 q { Tilher.41.1 METH.opNk FLOOR PLAN i enct v d-r-0.1P ixl4r Is 2r.341 p Pros C.c. x4Rw.at By r•RAR,r scat. flOP" a w By r 1 4 0 2�f2 'u-"v I JPA /auie From ea aewty to E UB-M1O � DUMPSTER GATE 410e0- A2.2 xp xN17 pp 7.07-1D • Ac -, y.. W A S '1' -- I • lT 0 1 '•11i. .. -- --: ;.I , I , a - N G : LN i'J' 1.._ [I, . ..1.... ., t :.11J.• • C 4 rt •, . • , 7. ' 4:t • II/ . ...-, '4 • : d - • c, ..,:_,,._„...,.,t_ ._J!,1 . ., . „.• 4- % . •1 ' -s,,..-,„7,4,.:. 414 - 1.1 1 ,.4-• : ot,r :I - ................,•••71 •, cm I ' • to •- ••••••,, :I ..... r 813 .5. \ 0- II lit . 40 \ . :•I b ..) Ifs .I? (I) 11 Ili • 900''''..• I a ill 2 • 3 it I . tri ,..; 1.• t .... - E C El N 0 1 t•-- ‘ r ..1. 4 14.1 '• . „:„ I In t 123 1.1 7.7i• •it-1"Li q i .. • :F- fILDGA-Emm r•--ij . • .R. --) . ,. - iil..____, ..____.. .. rx • I-.i Y . , . \\lk , • 4 0 1 0 1 . - ' • LI , Ct i. ....... ... x;44!'=-.. ,,, tr, . . . ...I . a.I 't 10 4' .-, • a_ >., : - 1-----1 • • Lti vt . ' J . 0 • / 1 171 COMMERCIAL-LIGHT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I • •fr ..1. 0 i- i 0 I :•.,-• . CD . 1 .. A ,. , ,,. C E tti 131 T..,,j! 1E ' R • . - ! a • 1... z ..... .1, 4 . . 1 n , . i.. 1 ' 1 I '1--•- 1 •• -J - • ----7 ' Ld ' Ix czi .. % i • 1 . . '' • • \ a .1 I I , 950 , • • / 1037.1. . r • .‘7, %. ''''. 1- I' SEWAGE , eg . 11 r4 EAGLE HARDWARE • -••i- v • . . . ... . . . I:. X ' EXTENDED STAY OF I. I CORPORATE OFFICES TREATMENT s•" . 1 5 r•1 i• qz 1. \ AMERICA HOTEL z 1 ' I iorH „. .. 1 • PLANTI -1% ' 1.1 ‘:\. .\ . , , • a, L'--- 11'-i•-VV* 41 64 2 f. .--- . 1 1.1 i-•=-1 •---- ri• 9 1,1 se 06'61 • ------ ._-_-• VACANT -IL I113 1 % -- 1 1 i ‘''k\ • t. . .....---;------ •---.-...5,-.. co • . 'x k_7. -..-;;;iii/o; ,.:,.. I 1...... .,.- u•.;,..,....0......,_.4.........„,-,2 • I .1 A k • ._ . :..1 ....i. . . . , I • ..,,,.....„_. i . . , 1. I I,._...-:.i___ --- ‘N°. • . ..:,.:pi.:;4...i,.. , ...,,,:......1 UNDERPASS . .. .u. 6 I 4 1-2 i-,-"Lr-. 1-4814-11 4-214r 814 1 I. I. -:"--•: E II 1.1 ''.'.7'II] .. -' 5 4 3 2 ---- PROJECT SITE ei- -- II 1 iIii..10 .11..,81: ,..22 23 124 75 ' - \i 11,01 '.1 s !- ' ;•• iii3 12 - 10 8.6 Ac 1 -% . 001) GCR 11 97 111, - • ' !---.-.---'.1.....,H l' . 1 ;-- -' - A 1 ' ' .'• . ir ,, ,i, , it __-- . , .0 a 0..--• .,,-.*1• „ ;09,1 . .1:-,- "" •.1 14 15 16 ,I • ....„--.-•-•-*-- 'I firt° ,,. .),IY D 1-161171;-6115p13 iz_" ...,--_.-ir-r-.7,51,,,-,p 55 56.. 1k ., .. ., . . ogiss . ------ •ouviso. PARIC IP jcITY UNIy.ERSITY -, :1: • 6 5 42 _.'" ,• 11''.-- ! 64.4 . j,,132 33 v 1 `‘,4,. 1 . 1.‘•65 ..7-: • . i 11 21 .• if il V. 1 .g.,..66 .0 , , • . -• to.: - • 1 1 1 , 4ciit 13 10 1..8.. '-1--'• - I 314°1916 ii ' 'NiElgrill ' .., 1 1 -. 1 ••4, ,.......... , • , u • ., .., ., ii z, . . ..14.., .., ...,..4.6 . ,...:=,------- - , , `4 Mt ii 2.6 Li. 2.4 31 2.1 g.137-14 __k_. -1;-,,aid sa'11 52 5334 5551 - ........-rm"..••.....• • . ......... . . thwire• ,,wisrrfri, ,;!5,1.....:,1 ,-•- '-'''''"'r"-- -r-'•'-''471.'rr4-----,..-•.-:e___ ....„.•.•.tz., . . , . . ''--)NI-UST A . ........ Y , cce.g. . . •,• ,, .1••.'.1....'.' . 1 ". '14i1I .1.3 6A'c,' ,•••I 57s W•,..\s\...•,..,_ rL.4 .,.,c,.'r• .,'..'. -r r1 I i01 .40C°1,•,R14 -35".101.l'-3-4:&:..,,:9...„s.• C6I0)F ,, .,I,:f,‘,2il6.,,i z,.1„.11i..96-s_4;,v„•-.L1•--,7 --Hi11--.-7Sa'.-•"_A.-ll, - - :- • • , . t,i i . it6s T.pA,, , 748 " e --- t,_ a•14.ts 16 11 18 20 21 22 23 N 2511 •111 18 19/t1 22 23 25 26 21 22 291 120 21 22?3 4.35. . 8 p 30 • '-'"-''''(1)-: ' 1 '''•: 350 JO)• . • ..._,_,__IL,41 La . • I •.. • 1 '''in 4 ' i . . .1.,t???. ri 56 • • .MI • . • . . . . . .. .. .),...-... iiiililb, in,. - • 11 I: . . , ..• .i...L.L,..,,b,,,..i.,. ,..)...14,_Li_i.„, mi..K24. _i_a_,,,I.J...1._i_i_ „I._ "-2zv. N._q 4 L..____ _L!4 . .!_4 §1_. , 1221_IR 2..........li_ • \\ - ,3 tyja4glito 1,6 L.,12- - te'r, is .n "_Vz..55.. • y_et... _4..._ • 'Id--;./.7 vt 61,36 1,•61 • • ____;44_,____ ______._:-I- fst- ii...p_ et--3-1,0-‘ -1,-7.--IM- . , UST, . • a I 41 V/ • N • . r . • ' \• " is 0• : BE. . <) • • 1 _,.. 77 2111 . • --1.3/41.- ; - -- ifl I-36 , • 15 1. 56 ,,,,, ' • NORTH 1 . . N. 1./,„„, ......• . L•_1 5 , . ; 1-1. r..6 _AR-_ 1 . - 1:4.014__. 0 .___.__LCITI:55 ' W • -.0.£- SCALE:1"=200' ' ‘ ,...ity_., _____4-....:2... - .....-:-.--:... ,,t_ia-rT_n•J__IS__.A•a:3_. . •• . . •&SY-2 -- 21 V VICINITY MAI) - • . . . _ -;, . • :._.....\,1._! ]_ • -- \ ' 6° 4i. -A-Mr-.17.6 i ':PIERRE-GRADY AY SITE -- • .. ' -- ---• - - - - , , CITY __)F REN ON Planning/Building/Public Works Depirtment Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Admi istrator • • October 20, 1998 • _ Ms.Vicki Morris Vicki Moms Consulting Services 7732- 18th Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98115 SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Way Site • . Project No. LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF - • Dear Ms. Morris: • . This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Enviro mental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-ref-renced - ' project. , ' . • No appeals were filed on the ERC determinetion. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. • ;' •As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on November 03, 1998, at 9:00 -AM to consider the Site Approvel and Rezone. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7219. • • For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager • cc: Mr. Donald Moody • - Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre/Owners FINAL DOC . • • • • • - ' 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055 ' ' • • :::: :>'� :::�i:;:::is2: ::::::::::?::::::i:::::::::::::2:::t i::?:::::: ':::;i;::::: 3::;:i»•:::;::::::;:;::;:.;;::;:::::;:2;:.:;::'�::::::j;i;::;:;:;:�::i>' . :<::::y;::;;•:t2:;•>;::t:;: E< i : :i2<` : :: 'Et'?`' T.PLANNIN FAFFIDA,`.:;.::.;.,>O:>...,,S;E:•>:;.:.;>;ICE,.,::<:..:;•.::.:.::;;;<.::::.; :.;:.:;:::::. ; «<}� ``lillo ::<<:: :;�::;:::«»::>::> :>:»:>:ii: :.;;:;.;:.::......................�1�T.. ..SE12VtbE..B�.MA1L1 On the 21.4 day o Oc"r,d,e r , 1998,.I deposited in the mails of the United . States, a sealed envelope containing_�, I deter mttudtw� 1 documents. This information was sent to: Name 1 Representing Department of Ecology . Don Hurter I WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Di Vision Larry Fisher) Washington Department of Fisheries • David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe i Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga I Puget Sound Energy I . • (Signature iof Sender) 10... tiL. sr@,eoycr . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ,, ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ll I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatirraiva, 9‘)". sign-d this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and pu'•oses • mentioned in the instrument) l01— S—mid' Dated: iA/�r /_ i ,r _- ! Notary Public;( and or t�e State of ashington Notary(Print) .MARILYN K HEFF My appointment expe ltMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: •tteYvQ laad4a 1 i 3„,- S tie. } Project Number: Luet, qa IZip SA—4k,R. E-Lf _ 1. NOTARY.DOC • i 1 CITX 3F REN ON Planning/Building/Public Works Dep rtment Greggimmerman Administratorn Jesse Tanner,Mayor � gg P.E., October 02, 1998 Washington State epartment of Ecology nvironmental Review Section -O Box 47703 ` - •lympia,WA 98504-7703 -ubject: Environmental Determinations ransmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by th nvironmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 30, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE "LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building;four fueling islands covered by a 2,65p sq. ft. canopy,,and installation',of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq.ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. o e-story building;with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. 'On-site'parking is proposed for pprox. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces',are allocated to the gasstation/convenience store with the remaining 158 or the car • rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed,two from SW Grady.Way, one for Oakesdale-Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave:SW,from,a 20 foot wide easement through the E gle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot The proposal also;includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to'Medium Industrial (IM). Location SW.Grady.Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW. ppeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. •ppeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00.application fee with: Hearing Examiner, city of Renton, 055 South Grady Way, Renton! WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code ection 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's •ffice,(425)-430-6510. f you have questions, please call me at(425) 430-7219. or Environmental Review Committee, eter R n i1V. -roject Manager c: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher,Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office L. • . Rod Malcom,Fisheries,1Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy GNCY-T61JBOG i055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 c: . CITY JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 02, 1998 • • • i Ms. Vicki Moms Vicki Morris Consulting Services 7732- 18th Avenue NE , Seattle, WA 98115 SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Way Site . Project No. LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF • Dear Ms. Morris: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)'and is to advise you,that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 30, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must befiledin writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the,required $75.00 application'fee with: Hearing.Examiner,I City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the"Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1 11B. Additional"information regarding the appeal,process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. I. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing'Examiner at his -regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on November 03, 1998, at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval andRezoneJ The applicant or representative(s) of the.applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report -will be mailed to you one week.before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the,appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal,rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the a cove, please call me at(425)430-7219. _ For e Environmental Review Committee, Peter R sen Project Manager cc: Mr. Donald Moody.• Mr. & Mrs. James Pierre/Owners Enclosure- , 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for-the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial.Offick(CO)to Medium Industrial (IM).: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: `. SW Grady Way,between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall payi the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is, estimated at $678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart and $2,730.00 .for the Rental Car Building.' The 'Fire Mitigation` Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average-daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $50,010 (666.8 trips x$75= $50,010). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. L . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: . James Pierre PROJECT NAME: - . Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store,j and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands ;covered by.a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building..pad of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the'car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to tt.ie gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW-Grady Way,-one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Offiice (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a req est to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial IIM). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL,:' . ` 'SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave.SW and Powell,,Ave. SW . • Ad visory Notes fes to AP p licant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they re not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.;;; FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station/Mini Mart is 1750 GPM.which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building: The preliminary fire flow for the Rental Car Building is 2500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping installations. 3.Provide a list of anyflammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be use or , q stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. Newwater mains, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly(building fire control system)will e required to meet current Fire Codes/Regulations per the Renton Fire Department. ' 2.Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private.property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area is required. . Surface Water . - . 1. Drainage and tempoary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 .-KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The applicant will be required to pay storm drainag (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq:.ft:of new impervious surface installed by the project.. - • Pierre Grady Way Site LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF. Advisory Notes (Continued) Wastewater 1. New side sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with a permit cost of $80/connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.078/sq.ft. of gross area-of the site is required. Transportation 1.All proposed driveways to serve the site shall be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locations approved by the City s Traffic Engineering Section. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS All landscaped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) PPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a ar rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx,. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building, with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convvenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Fowl new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office](CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998peals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 05, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 1998 SIGNATURES: 21/71t Gregg Zim rma dministrator DATE Departme t of PI nning/Building/Public Works (?t-- i Shepherd, I istrator DAT Co munity Serv' es 07-71 Lee h e e , Fir ief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC - I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, land a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four=ueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned ford future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a forth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office arking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell ve. SW MITIGATION MEASURES: ' I 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square fopt lof new construction. This fee is estimated at $678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart and $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $50,010 (666,8 trips x$75= $50,010). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE , (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF . APPLICANT: James Pierre PROJECT NAME: i Pierre Grady Way Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four f'eling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel orage tanks. A building pad ,of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq.ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a foiirth to Powell Ave. SW, from a' 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The,proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM) The proposal includes a request to rezone the sife from.Commercial Office,(CO)to Medium Industrial (l ). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. . SW ' Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. - FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station/Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The prelin-inary fire flow for the Rental Car Building is 2500 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building rand two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2: Separate.plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used r stored•on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. New water mains, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required to meet current Fire Codes/Regulations per the Renton Fire Department. 2.Any new water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sgl ft. of gross site area is required. Surface Water1 1. Drainage and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1 90 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The applicant will be required to pay storm drainage iSDC) fees of$0.129/sq.:ft. of new impervious surface installed by the project. .:;: ; . • *Pierre Grady Way Site _ LUA-98-1,26,SA-H,R,EC F Advisory Notes (Continued) Wastewater 1. New sie sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with a permit cost of $80/connlection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$0.078/sq.ft. of gross area of the site is required. , Transportation 1.All proposed driveways to serve the site shall be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locations approved by the City's Traffic Engineering Section. • PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS All lands •ped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. • • • - I I. . 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The E vironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigat-d for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. \ PIERRE GRAY WAY SITE LUA98-126,SA-H,R,ECF A Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review and a Rezone for a proposal to construct a . gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave SW and Powell Ave SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Dearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh;floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA on November 3, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval and Rezone. If the Environmental Determination is appeal d, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited toi attend the pub is hearing. Public tion Date: October 5, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub1dot I ; I 1 1 I • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION• i PROJECT NAME: PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA.96426,SA-H,R,ECF Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft.building,four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq.8. I canopy,and Installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks.A building pad of approx.10,000 sq.ft.is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would Include a 5,250 sq.ft.one-Most building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx.168 1 cars,10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience More with the remaining 158 for the car , rentuUsales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way,one for Oakesdale Ave.SW,and a fourth to Powell Ave.SW,from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also Includes a rezone from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial OM). The proposal Includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium 1 I Industrial(IM).Location:SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave.SW and Powell Ave.SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED I I THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. 1 Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1 1998:Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 48-11 B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,c425)-430-8510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.Washington.on NOVEMBER 03, 1998!at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval and Rezone. If the Environmental Determination Is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. I 1 _ ' W p 9 1 H a T ,o�,41 . n l ,-.,... I T a C N N l . _ t a l a .Ew i...2....i 6 .. _ 1 III t. il y ; • e ` ,r _. ��-'t ....., ,„,a rMrr 'e RR I 1 III -� �/ �y 'bY r r r .1 * '`fyllt i,,rrlrl i 14 =.,JISnT4�N VJaS�� FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I,. j;>>:;;Please:Includethe'pro)ect-NUMBERwhen'callIngforproperfile'identification.'.>`c".'•.I i CERTIFICATION • , I, ',/ 11Y10AV1,e41 hereby certify that 3 copies of the above li do' ument were posted by me in S conspicuous places on or nearby .I the described property on OC-1'0 r S , l iaS .Signed: <;i Jhvt.��n^i� ' e a NortaryPublic,in andn for the State of EST: Sub cribed and sworn before m , ashington residing in -7 ,1 , on the day of e . / 48 • , MARILYN!I KAMCH E 7' COMMIS ,`-',"-, EXPIRES 6/29/..._• • . • lq . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE PROJECT NL MBER: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/conver fence store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy,and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rentalUsales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with he remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of th se spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales u�e. Four new points,of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave.SW,and a fourth to Powell Ave.SW,from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial(IM)J Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave.SW and Powell Ave.SW. THE CITY OF R NTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED • T AT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE E VIRONMENT. j Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing • Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.•-Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. • A Public Hearing ,ill be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Clambers on the 7 floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on NOVEMBER 03, 1998,at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval and Rezone. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be hard as part of this public hearing. W A S 'I I N G�.T G 1,0 1, r c�_ • Q1 ' z a1II 1 � 3 .:Lam-— I g •...` o, J • 1 yI o T E C .H N� I l •' y � _ . N q iei o! ¢ -- F'i Y G• ^I o• z y MM[P JGIrtpYYSIW� i 30 Q O it m • CI EAl rE R 1 '� z r K e a ssw. 76 I` n ' .n . cry y gfa,:ew.ns • .SL` *.+*sir+rr P X. czrznomsr.ror i cowoo.rz omcrs ,piN rwrt �`,�I.w,l auam SW 11 ;1!li-`I-_.•..`�.j•o till- v u 1 goo A `;kr � � 1 i :. a '`, 5,N• .'. :e,, o ooft° -- � � . ,q,r ,- •;t't •,• r F HWr 405• ` gyp. «, 1\ 1 ' , 2 �+� 3-t.t .. ,_ S.W.' 11eI6TH Frsr G . III 1'isil(tl�i�4.1,Iful.I°l"I'I' ?n 7!!•1:I,j�6' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION rigiiikiRe0030000340!PrOie.ONVM.PgRi*.4010allikiii**0.01103400#0000015%11 r � STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BAKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE , SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 Project Name Pierre Grady Way Site Applicant James Pierre File Numb r LUA-098-126, SA-H, R, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq. ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building, with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On- site parking is proposed for 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 spaces for the auto display and customer parking needs of the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, via a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM). Project Location SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW Exist. Bldg Area gsf NA Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 5,250 s.f. - Phase I 10,000 s.f. -Total Site Area 2.74 acres Total Building Area gsf 5,250 s.f. - Phase I 10,000 s.f. -Total RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC _, City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro 'gal Review Committee Staff Report ? f PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE 1 LUA98-126,SA-H,R,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 Page 2 of 5 I I , B. RECOMMENDATION Bas d on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials mak the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with' 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. I , 1 Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal'Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new cons ruction. This fe'e is estimated at$678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart and $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall Ibe required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip asso iated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $50,010 (666.8 trips'x $75 = $50, 10). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Advisory Mites to Applicant: The followir��g notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE i 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station/Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The preliminary fire flow for the Rental Car Building is 2 00 GPM which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of tIIe building. 2. Separate (plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping installations. 3. Provide a ist of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. New wate mains, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly (building fire control system)will be required to meet current Fire odes/Regulatio lis jper the Renton Fire Department. 2. Any new ater mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private property will be required to be 1 in easement that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area is required. Surface Wat r 1 1. Drainage ?nd temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by ttie City of Renton. 'The applicant will be required to pay storm drainage (SDC)fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new imperviddus surface installed by the project. Wastewater 1. New side ewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with a permit cost of$80/connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. I ERCRPT.DOC 1 i City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro atal Review Committee Staff Report •-d PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE ! LUA98-126,SA-H,R,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 Page 3 of 5 Transportation 1. All proposgd driveways to serve the site shall be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locations approved by the City's Traffici Engineering Section. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. PARKS All landscaped areas outside the property line are to be maintained by the property owner. D. ENV'RONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occ r in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: Approximately 18,0i 00 cubic yards of fill soil was placed on the subject site in August-September 1997, to bring the site up to grade with surrounding streets and sidewalks. A Special Fill and Grade Permit was approved by the Hearing Examiner for this activity. The placement of the fill created a level site and prepared the site for p oposed construction. It is estimated that an additional 3,200 cubic yards of gravel would be placed on the site for the building 'pad, utility and pavement subgrade preparation. Pre-loading, scarification, and recompactio h are recommended in areas proposed for bearing structures, utilities installation, driveway and parking areas. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of!a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan and prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 2. Air Impacts Ir pacts to air qual ity can be anticipated during construction and after completion of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed'soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment,exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exh ust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the I State of Washington. Overall air impacts would be relatively minor in nature and not considered significant to warrant special mitig tion measures. The gas station fueling system would include a vapor recovery system to prevent fuel vapor from entering the atmosphere. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA ERCRPT.DOC 1 ti. City of Renton P/B/PW Department t Enviro -dal Review Committee Staff Report PIERRE GRAPY WAY SITE 1 LUA98-126, SA-H,R,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 29, 19981 Page 4 of 5 1 3. Water Impacts: There are no wetlands or surface waters identified on the subject site. Under the previous fill and grade permit, a subsurface stormwater conveyance system was installed in a former open drainage channel through the property. It was determined in 1997 through technical review that the former drainage channel was not a natural watercourse and does not provide fisheries habitat due to irregular flows and poor water quality. (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, July 11, 1997). Approximately 100 feet of open drainage channel remains at the west end of the property, adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. Channel side slopes have been reinforced with gabion walls The channel bottom and side slopes have been seeded with grass to provide biofiltration stormwater quality treatment for drainage exiting the subject property via a culvert under Oakesdale Avenue SW,(prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. The site is approximately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, and separated from this drainage course by the Oakesdale Avenue SW right-of-way (a 5-lane section with ,urb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides). Stormwater anagement facilities include biofiltration swales and drainage collection structures at various locations. M st on-site surface'water entering the collection system would be directed to the existing stormwater vault located immediately north'of the proposed gas station mini-mart, constructed during the 1997 grade and fill action. A 8-inch diameter culvert conveys the site flows off-site with adequate flood storage capacity. Downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity and appear to function sufficiently to convey developed- condition runoff from the subject site without on-site detention. All the conveyance facilities on the subject site would be required to be sized in accordance with the City requirements and the standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Renton. 1 All surface vdater flows from the gas station pump islands, underground fuel tank filling areas and vehicle wash room would a collected in a cement concrete tank, pass through an oil/water separator, then discharged to the sanitary sew r. An in-line emergency shut-off valve will be placed at the outside of the oil/water separator valves. Both the gas station pump islands and vehicle wash area will be covered to minimize the collection of rainfall in this system. Underground fuel storage tanks will be constructed to applicable standards, for spill prevention add control. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA. 4) Fire rotection Impacts ThSproposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based'on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart and $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This.fee is estimated at $678.60 for the gas station/mini-mart and $2,730.00 for the Rental Car Building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. i Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. ' 5) Transportation Impacts Fo r new points of driveway access are proposed; two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a f urth to Powell Ave. SW, via a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposa would result in an,increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. Trip generation numbers are estimated from the ITE Trip Generation Manual based lupon the different use proposed on the site. Staff estimates a total of 666.8 new average daily trips would be generated with the pro osal. The applicant prepared a traffic analysis which estimated a total of 440 trips. Staff rejects report assumptions used for passby trips and the assumed reduction in traffic mitigation fees for "very short trip ERCRPT.DOC 1 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envirc intal Review Committee(Staff Report PIERRE GRA Y WAY SITE LUA98-126,SA-H,R,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 29, 19981 Page 5 of 5 lengths of ne new trips." Therefore, staff recommends a Traffic Mitigation Fee estimated at$50,010 (666.8 trips x$75= $50, 10). I The applican has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan (on the Composite Utility Plan)which states that constructionwould be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:3 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.iunderthe Development Guideline Ordinance. I Mitigation M asures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $50,010 (666.8 trips x $75 = $50,010). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance I � 5) Envi onmental Healthi Impacts: Th proposal includes the installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. The tanks would be installed and operated in accordance with Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) standards and other applic ble State and local regulations. Protective measures include double-walled tank construction and an electroni leak detection monitoring system. The gas station tenant has a Hazardous Material Management Plan, Under round Storage Tank Monitoring Plan, Leak Response Plan, Emergency Response Procedures, and an Employe Training Plan to be implemented with site development. Separate permits from the Renton Fire Prevention Bureau will be required for the installation of the underground tanks and piping. Mitigation Measures No furthler mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexu NA 6) Lan and Shoreline Use Impacts: Th proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM), in orde to permit site development of a gas station with mini-mart and car rental/used car sales operation. The site is located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation which was adopted by the City Council in 1996 for the purpose of allowing a range of commercial, office and industrial uses to develop in the Valley. Rezones between industrial and commercial zones are consistent with the intent of the EAV designation and therefore a Comprehensive Plan amendment is not required. The site specific rezone and the propose development of a gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency is not expected to adversely impact existing or allowable land uses in the vicinity of the site. Mitigation M asures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexu NA. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposl has been circl lated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, iiese comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Ap licant. I X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. 1 Environm ntal Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writi' g on or beforei 5i00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with;the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Exami er are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal peocess may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT.DOC -- ' = W A S I I N• G •II id 1 ; L'�; ;I I F— I, 1 .,... • 4. 1. I1) _ 1- -J,•- !--- 1111 jN •� I Y...:.. { -� r O a�. 1 .11.11 L I .Ifr, II 7t '° I D' I 1 /y N I I° • -1 0 1 -J 6L I I ••• I m 11 1 2 • 3 r�, 1 I H 1 Q 1 l II7 • t' 1� I. 5 Y D I E C• H N 11 9 Z 903 co 121 �' e�oc.19'y I Q " s II1___ r - --- 1. Q Y LL ' a l`• • I z CC 1, - q.,.i3+ Q "xll , - -..I - I I �I 10 `: -4 �. . Z . 'ztV. W —I / m 'COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I -- Trp .. • /•• 1.I1 C• E ..T ii1E R • I a I-. 011� z 131 T _I • • ` - +J37Y 7, III , -I• .950 SEWA E 1 . . . II II li ee L I EAGLE HARDWARE • e: ..v a TREA ENT v=, •. I EXTENDED STAY OF 1• I CORPORATE OFFICES F Sr 71 `sa: • PLANT l Z k•1 ` 'AMERICA HOTEL . II • 1 ",, iorN • vv 1 1 7 ' 1' 1 7. 66 x,•! - a 99 \ • S.P.138'BI - ' '�— 113 I y .S;* I - JE VACANT o: -0% , % j• .--4,... .-• , . A • 1 Y . r•-I tl� PROJECT SITEaillirtj ,\NQ I 0, 10 y 6 7 6 ��-L_IOB6Ac 1 1 •1 /Oa1 p.0 - -- :Il}12 II / , 97 ;I \: / I _ OR - I1- 2223 1. 9 `^I 1 20 21 11 .i - .n10, kN• - 12 „ 109 61 y•y�-� IlllrlS16 -- ti1 Es ' / �S I„16II5 14,13 I-_— _ .-1�34 SS • . I J Jy. .l... 9 •$1014 / .r:r%� 19 16 1-ii I iris 1 �gN►1s ✓' 9!1 a_L l�,�•r 47 46d�Is I 1 � • :1;' . Yk �-_- tc: 4£3 1;- -al atll3 145146 �' I . I. s ` �1 �'� PARK �ll351631ITY USITY •• •.i1kTi / Q :Lt262S2d 32 2170 A 1 Wi. • ..• y % • • �' LIMI7E. ccess 6 •7P�s.•�4 60 1 y609_,-. I'1 •¢147 `I 1 • 7.1.E �' �� I if ,R II 1p 13/1' i1 34 y6 � •i - lS,�374 2 - r e '.. �6 x., 33i 4 ; t,16 36 ,.,w '-' I..c k �"_,. w ` 1• b ` 1.•6 519 3 ill. I 14; l—� 6 .1R 35' I xl+e 'I 6 e ti 1 y(�1a;L a�5 `311 J rc_ 1 '�;157 AC. 0 12 11D 2 1 •Fi s- i + 1 •1 34, 71X 1 g 13.. •-2-"Tr--4, y 2 2----I(/� 3' t 1 oyb YD1 '. N!7 t�2 r£_' .�� C-- 9316 � �7J. 1 � Qar i 96 _,_• 1I 1 - ap 14 L5 I6 17 19 20 21 22 23 2 SIb •Ill I._16 19 2223 24 2S 26 21 2Y 29' 70 21 22 2324 25 1 6 Z9 30 31 11757 71 S6 3so .ln iG ~.~ .�,•-... ,• •Ci v,J3.a ...� �I 13JM....... , ` S W. 16TH ST '� I Ily' III�i�iild,111111111 'r� 111 i i i I.l j d )0.1.1.J.1 IAI I N).r - 111- I 1�.Ji-I'4 i i; II, 'II! s',,.1_.41051413i 1 • :I11::1.. I I I,,I r`- ++F• rr- I, 11,is'I I',�Ii in :1 1- • 11121 I W -1,21-1-'I9 3 i '1 I 13 1 I 1 ,5 • .I..LL:1„4„..t' $ ..1..1.; L1+107. .,g_ I .LLA.(r1J-1-1 1$4.,1--' I.., .rN-••--_:z72 5��--- -1--- __4 Q 4 R ;,_4==_ wy_ I :-: ...._73' lerleva._`• i-a3_ _5. •_e e� '�r?h.F'!_But_ I _SL�i9M-_ 19 tI Sv _� -_Fill F xn 31! NORTH 1 1�_iluta•_ •_--- i~ 'V6 -- f�_4,._'" c. a._ SCALE:1"m200' •I --�A -• V------:i'Aah . •kp �!.... 1 4 :5 .,,t— • ` •` __ VICINITY MAP li = 'zi • _ 2� I _ \•' -.'•�—---I. PIERRE-GRADY WAY SITE - 1 i • • \y - `• �' �Z� QCII• i if DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON SEP 16 1998 RECEIVED Sept:mber 10, 1998 Pete Rosen, Project Manager . Deve opment Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 (RE: A pplication Use Number: LUA-98-126, SA-H, R, ECF pplication Name: Pierre Grady Way Site Dear Mr. Rosen: In response to yoJr; Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non- Signi icance, dated September 1, 1998 I would like to go on record as endorsing the abov- referenced Land Use change from CO to IM. I hav- studied the project and I believe the land uses proposed in this plan are needed to sun port the existing,businesses in the area. Plea-e feel free to call;me if you have any questions. Sinc- e , Dona d A. Moody, M naging Partner Bridg- Group Partne ship I . - I Cityi.:_ _nton Department of Planning/Building/Pul, -Norks ENVIRONMENTAL ;& DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEIPARTMENT: . �� PVtV.i#tO COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 APPLICATION NE): LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr, &Mrs. James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Ra N l ON FIRE DFPT -If '}h poo fc-Nrri l Ili 1pFr1U PROJECT TITLE,. Pierre Grady Way Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW S E P 0 1 1998 SITE AREA: 2.74 I acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANS;Ifl,NNr�GRROQp°S): :8,555_ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rentausai'e8�offic -fie gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation;of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking,is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points " of driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 oot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts i impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I I Housing i Air I I Aesthetics J Water I Light/Glare I Plants 1 Recreation I Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities I Animals I I ' Transportation I Environmental Health'' ' Public Services Eby/ I Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment ' 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /l)o /``a i10/- �,� aalS aid v a. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 4.)/1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Ce e a/�Jt �1 D IX N2en/ 5 We have reviewed this application with pal nScular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas here additional info tic n is needed to Properly assess this proposal. I ,Cimken , 7/9/n1 ig ature of Director r Autho' epresentative Date PP.DOC Rev.10/93 a + I CITY OF RENTON '11 �e FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU N MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner 1 FR M: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal I I ; SU JECT: Pierre Grady Way Project, SW Grad Way at Oakesdale Fir Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station- Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires ?rie fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one ad iitional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The preliminary fire flo for the Rental Car Building is 2500 GPM, which requires one by rant with 150;feet of the building and two addition hydrants within 30 feet of the building. 2. eparate plans and permits are required for the gas tanks and piping ins allations. 3. rovide a list ilof any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous the icals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$678.60 is required for the Gas Station - Mini Mart and the Rental Car Building fee is $2,730.00 based on $.52 a square foot of b b ilding square footage. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I I 54 Citl'::.-t?enton Department of Planning/Building/I- Works ENVIRONMENTAL ;& D.EVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr' &Mrs.James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen I I PROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady Wayl Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW SITE AREA: 2.74 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANSION GROSS): 6,555 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation lof two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq.,ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking,is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated too the gas station/Convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway ac ss are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW, from a 20 oot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezo a from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from C mmercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). A. ENV/RON4ENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ ! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet • 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS j 10 / alAval'<14-eq/* >6V)erelel alr-721/Z, I I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Noc;- tP/1� OAP, ifl We have reviewed)this application with P articular attention to those areas in which we ave expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas PPli where additional information is ne ed to properly assess this proposal. gn ure of Direct r or Authorized Representative 1 DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 III I City:.....mton Department of Planning/Building/Piiund Works ENVIRONMENTAL ;& DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 11 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (,oVI1SIvtlt,.kl(Th SeA el COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,8A-1H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen Cis i I ; �1- PROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady Way,Site WORK ORDER NO: 7842 � � ^O LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW �/j tir SITE AREA: 2.74 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPAF VN GO SS): 6,555 SUMMARY OF FtROPOSAL: Propsal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car re*-I/saf8 office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered b ,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 16 .0 0 sq.ft. is proposed for thle car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story ••'1,.• ng,,with the remaining portibn planned for future expansion. On-site parking,is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of thase spaces are allocated to the gas station/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposeld;ltwo from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Powell Ave. SW,from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). A. ENV/RON ENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS I Element of the Probable ,Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts !Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing I. Air Aesthetics II Water I. Light/Glare Plants I Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals I Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural I Natural Resources. Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet J B. POLICY-R LATED COMMENTS I 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS1 /2L1_oc.-5 So i L lre. 6.pc7 i4.Y i 6—co 1'1 i- i IL.)py-( p N-__I 1 I We have reviewed his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' Ca .1 7 S/7 3 Signature of Directdr or Authorized Re resentative Date 9 P DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City ci,..anton Department of Planning/Building/Puvlic Works I ENVIRONMENTAL ,& DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW! SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0 • tt01NtIC.. ZeVCIop� MENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 199;8 APPLICATION I•O: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF 1 DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 it APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter RosenIIII PROJECT TITLE: Pierre Grady W,aIy1j Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW SITE AREA: 2.74 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANSION GROSS): 6,555 SUMMARY OF FROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft. canopy, and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq.'ft. is proposed for the car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq. ft. one-story building;]with the remaining portion planned for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx. 168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas station/connvenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed;i;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to Dowell Ave. SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(Ie.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor 'Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air ' Aesthetics 1 Water Light/Glare I Plants I Recreation I Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation I Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet , 14,000 Feet I I B. POLICY-R LATED COMMENTS I c 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1 We have reviewed his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a•• ••• . needed to'properly assess this proposal. 0011111MLItrabh. I 9 id/4 Signat I re of ' ecto or Aut;' ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET i Reviewing Department:'Plan Review Water Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 Appliclation No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 Applicant: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project'Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Location: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site Area: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 A. En ronmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments 7 No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments I New water main, additional fire hydrants or DDCV Assembly (building fire control system) will be require to met current Fire Codes/Regulations per the Renton Fire Department. Any new- water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults or water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gros. area of the site is required. ' IG / 1 . 1 r--a i' Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierre2 , I i City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 Revie •' g Department:1 Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 A�pli on No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 Applicant: Mr. &Mrs. James Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project,Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Locati n: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site ea: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 A. En ' onmental Impact;(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Co ent. B. Poli y-Related Comments No Comment. II C. Co 'e-Related Comments Surfac Water: Drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans shall be designed in accord ce with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The site will be require to pay st In drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed by the projeelt to the site. Waste' ater: New side sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with permit cost of $80/co i ection. Sanitary lsewer(SDC)fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required 4-d 4441,A4" ' 7-/C-78 Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierrel II li I I - i l City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 Revie ' g Department:1 Transportation Comments Due: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 Applic tion No.: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF Date Circulated: September 02, 1998 Applic t: Mr. &Mrs.lJames Pierre Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Pierre Grady Way Site Work Order No: 78423 Locati n: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW Site ea: 2.74 acres Building Area(gross): 6,555 1 A. Environmental Impala(e.g.Non-Code) Comments I No Comment. I B. Polry-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments All proposed driveways to serve the site will be installed per current City Codes/Standards and at locatiohs approved by the:City's Traffic Engineering Section. A tr c mitigation fee of $75/trip will be required (see attached traffic mitigation fee calculation memor dum). 1 _� r r 1©---'[c i. Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date pierre3 I I � I II CITY OF RENTON P NNING/ b UILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 TO: I1ETER ROSEN FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJE I T: PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE-LUA-98-126 • TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION I have r:viewed the traffic report prepared by Michael R Birdsall and Associates (5/29/98) for the Pierre G ady Way site, and cannot concur with the conclusions for the trip generation values and traffic itigation fees. The assumptions used for passby trips are much higher than used foi similar projects, and there is no reduction in traffic mitigation fees for "very short trip lengths of net new rips". The trip generation values which should be used for determining the traffic mitigation fees for this project .' e shown below Gas Stat on/Convenience Store: We have had several other projects of this nature in the recent past. e values used ere estimated from the ITE Manual Land Use #845, Service Station wit1 Conveni nce Market. The trip generation value used is 143.05 trips per pump island, with an assumption of 44% of the these trips being new primary trips. This proposal has four pum islands, ith net new daily trips of: (4)(143.05)(0.44) = 251.8 daily trips The optional second story office above the market: The figures calulated in the traffic report are acceptab e. Per page 2 of the report: 7 daily trips Car rent onion: The figures calculated in the report can be accepted with the revisions. The miscell eons trips can be considered passby and not included. There is no reduction for "ver + short ne new trips". New'daily trips: 52 + 20 + 4 = 76 daily trips Used c ortion: Figures calculated in report are acceptable. 62 daily trips Future r stauraunt: No deduction allowed for "short trip lengths of net new trips" 270 dail tri is Traffic itigation fees sl_all be$75 per net new daily trips, based upon the above values. •�- I City k,., anton Department of Planning/Building/Pi;. "Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: II 'P��Ic.G COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 15, 199 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 02, 1998 APPLICANT: Mr. &Mrs.James Pierre PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE Pierre Grady Way,Site WORK ORDER NO: 78423 LOCATION: SW Grady Way between oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW SITE AREA: 2.7 acres I BUILDING AREA(NEW EXPANSION GROSS): 6`555 SUMMARY OF P OPOSAL: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales of ice. The • gas station/con enience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft. building, four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 s . ft. canopy, and installation f two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq. . is proposed forth car rental/sales office. Initial construction would include a 5,250 sq.ft. one-story building,with the remaining porti n planned for future expansion. On-site parking.is proposed.for approx. 168 cars, 10 of th se spaces are allocated to the gas station/Convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway acc ss are proposed;two from SW Grady Way, one for Oakesdale Ave. SW, and a fourth to powell Ave. SW, from a 20 oot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezo e from Comme Icial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The proposal includes a requeit to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). • j L kl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS /� Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable ' Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air ' Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation 1• Environmental Health Public Services I , Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet stimate 3.4 police calls :for service annually, based on the size of the building. This calculation •s based on a 'formula for 9-1-1--calls to commercial buildings in they City of entoh, and •s not seperated by the different types of businesses. Therefore, due to the type of, busi esses in this proposal (auto sales lot and convenience store/gas s ation) , the actual numbe of calls wild be very high. his site is situated in The R-1 police district of Renton; an area which reports the highest umber of co mercial burglaries , thefts , auto related thefts and car. prowls , than any other .rea in the ity. n order to , elp: prevent theft of building materials and tools while the site is under onstruction, it will need' security fencing around the perimeter of the site, and all tools .nd building materials will need to be secured when,;not in use. Recommend the site receive portable, to porary secu'ri'ty lighting, as well . Auto Theft a d Car Prowl1V!andalism to Vehicles is one of the major problems to businesses in this area of town. Recommend the car sales area have perimeter fencing around the car lot -o help prevent the theft 'of vehicles and removal from the property. This fenciyy�ig can be as simple as chain-and-pole, that will still allow visibility by customers, but prevent C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS . We have reviewed is application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proba le impact or areas where additional Inf•rmation is needed to property assess this proposal. ieeB / f vb Si a re of Directo „r A •• or•Re�ntative Date 9-Lfr-qr DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ' /, stolen cars from being removed from the property. The fencing should also enclose all access areas onto the property after the business has closed. The convenience store/gas station will attract crime problems such as : Commercial Robbery, Shoplift and Gas Drive-Offs. Gas-drive-offs can be prevented by installing pumps that are pay-first, or pay-at-the-pump. Gas stations which have old-fashioned pumps that allow a customer to pump gas before paying, are setting themselves up for theft. To help prevent Commercial Robbery, refer to the attached Washington Administrative Code for Late Night Retail Worker's Crime Prevention. The police department also provides robbery and shoplift prevention training to businesses free of charge, on request. • . Part A-3 .LATE NIGiHT RETAIL WORKERS CRIME PROTECTION WAC • 296-24-102 Scope and application. 296-24-1020 General Requtrernenis. WAC 2'6-24-102 ScoIL rand application. Application of this section is limited to retail establishments operating between th hours of 11:00p.m.,and 6:00 a.m. with the exception of restaurants, hotels, taverns, or ani lodging facil- ity. ,(Statu ory Authority: Chapter 49.17 RCW. 90-03-029 (Order 89-20). § 296-24-102. filed 1/1 1/90, effective 2/26/90.] WAC 2'6-24-10203 G neral requirements. (1) All employers operating late night retail establishments shall pro- vide crime .revention trainin g,to their employees. (2) Cri e prevention training shall be a part of the accident prevention program requirements imposed pursuant to WAC 29. 24-040. (3) The mployer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of robbery and violence prevention are underst•.. by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for their safety have been provided. The em- ployer shall: (a) Provide training and training materials that outline security policies, safety and security proce ures, and per- sonal safet and crime avoidance techniques. (b) Provide formal instruction through a training seminar or training video presentation and upon completion re- quire the e ployee to sign off on the date, time, and place of training. The training documentation w'll be placed in the employ e's personnel file. The following elements shall be included in the crime prevention training program: (i) An e planation of they importance of keeping the store clean, neat,'and uncluttered thereby ma ing it as unat- tractive,as ssible to robbers.' .. (ii) Provide explanation of the purpose of maintaining an unobstructed view of the cash register from outside the store. provi ed the cash regiter is located in a position visible from the street. (iii) Prov de instruction on reasons for operating only minimum number of cash registers at night. (iv) Kce_ ing the cash register fund to a minimum. (v) Taki g extra precautions after dark, i.e., keep alert, observe lighting and dark corners, spot possible hiding places. . (vi) Violence prevention procedures in case of robbery. (vii) Pro ide a refresher 'course on crime prevention on or near the employee's anniversary date. Videotape and crime prove tion material shall be available for employee's review at their request. (4) In addition to providittg; crime prevention training as defined in this section, all employers operating late night retail establishments shall: (a) Post . conspicuous sin in the window or door which states that there is a safe on the premises and it is not ac- cessible to the employees on the premises and that the cash register contains only the minimal amount lof cash needed to conduct •usiness: No employer shall be subject to citation and penalty for having moneys in the sash register in excess of th minimal amount 'needed to conduct business. (b) All d splays, and any b ther material posted in window(s) or door(s) should be arranged so as to provide a clear and unobst ucted view of the cash register; provided the cash register is located in such a position so as to be visible from the st eet. (c) Have a drop—safe, limited access safe, or comparable device on the premises. (d) Oper.to the outside 'lights for that portion of the approach and parking area that is necessary to accommodate customers during all night hb u'rs the late night retail establishment is open. This may be accomplished through: (I) Surve !lance lighting —]to detect and observe pedestrian and vehicular entrances. (ii) Provi•ing adequate ill minances — adequate illuminance throughout the pedestrian and vehicular entrance areas should be a minimum of one foot candle to comply with ANSI/IES RP7-1983. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 49.17 RCW. 9' 13-029 (Order 89-20), § 296-24-10203, filed 1/11/90, effective 2/26/90.] • (2/26/90) A ICI. 296-24 WAC(Part A-3)—p 1) II ORIGINAL , . . ::::::::::: mmiligme • D.EvE O:P:::4E::1 SERV;>::>.><:S:::DII::»><><<.:;gi <<<`_E.i' <`>`>`> >' >< > i ` • .:<;::.;:::.:;::::::::.::::.;::::.;.;::.;::.:;::.:::;;:.;::.:::::.;:.::::;;;:.::::.; ...E4QP... NT..SERU.)CES.:D.IVTSr.ON.:::.�:�..::......................::..:�,::.. . :::::: : :: ...... ................. . ............................... :.::.::::.::.::L:I.S:T:.:.:::O:F::..:.S:.U.R i O:U: .. D i:;:;, is ::::: : :: ::: ::: :.::;::. ::: ::;:::: ::........: :: ::.::: :::..::: : > N ..::.. : lG '. O:PERTY::::O.VI/NERS::::.:.: ::i4:i::::::iiiii::i:iiiii: i::2ii:ii::i::i'iiiiiiiii::iii:iiiiii;:L:i;:y:�:iii)i:i:: .: i ...:::::::: : ::. :::::::•:::•isi:•isii}iiikC•::•i::•iiiii:::i::+•:vii:• :::::.within..::>3.Q0>'..e:�t':of<tti�e" ub"e i <:..5. ct..s te..<:i::<::«;:::;:iii:::�i>::i::i:::i:<i::i::�i>::i»:isi: :;::>::i::i::ii>:iii::i:.i::•>i;:.ii:.: i:; ;::>::;»:i:>:::i:isi::::ii:;::::::>: ::: :iii:si::ii:::i:<i:;�:>:i<::::isi .. .. ...:.......................:.....:..................1..................:::: . :::.::::::.�:.::::.::::::..::.....................::::::::::::. PROJECT NAME: Pierre Grady Way Site @ 0akesdale Ave SW APPLICATION NO: LUlD1 98 • %2.(0, $b-t•t. R I ee jr The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • NAM ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL II NUMBER Earlingt n Business Park 710 Thomas Avenue SW 214600-0010 P.O.Box 565048 • 214610-0033 Dallas, 75356 BurlingtQn Northern Santa Fe 901 SW 7th Street • 214610-0020 1700 E Gblf Road#400 242304-9099 Schaumburg,IL 60173 1 • ® -VCL',iOP v,� Systems s h Avenue Inc. 805 SW 10th Street 242304-9025 C/7y OF-ir ,'�PLA Ii 86561 Redmond,WA 98052 AUG 1 4 1998 King County/Metro 1550 SW Grady Way 242304-9026 Exchange Building 1350 SW Grady Way 242304-9053 LPtIVED 821 Seco d Avenue 1400 SW Grady Way 242304-9066 , Seattle, A 98104 No site address 242304-9125 The Bri ge Group 1349 SW Grady Way 242304-9054 16443 S 35th Street Bellevue,WA 98008 King Co my 1200 Monster Road SW 242304-9097 • 506 2nd Avenue#708m • No site address 242304-9125 Seattle, A 98104 1300 SW Grady Way 242304-9126 • City of Renton 1300 SW Grady Way 242304-9098 200 Mill (venue S 242304-9112 • Renton, A 98055 Puget Sound Energy ' 900 SW Grady Way 242304-9113 P.O.Box 90868 Bellevue,WA 98009 . Puget Western,Inc. I 1000 SW Grady Way 242304-9110 19515 N'reek Parkway#310 1201 SW Grady Way 242304-9128 Bothell,WA 98011 I 1200 SW Grady Way 242304-9132 1301 SW Grady Way 242304-9133 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Internat onal Business&List 901 SW Grady Way 242304-9124i' 335 116 Avenue SE 334040-7100 Bellevue,WA 98004 Drainag District#1 1100 Oakesdale Avenue SW 242304-9130 ' 601 W. owe Street Kent,WA 98032 Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. 981 Powell Avenue SW 918800-0110i 720 E Wisconsin Ave , Milwauk e,WI 53202 Blackrier Jv Llc 1200 Oakesdale Avenue SW 918800-0148 4640 95th Avenue NE Bellevue,WA 98004 . Applicant Certification I, Vicki Morris , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: • ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records) _— C`�� f Title Company Records -f co •••• ioti ' Poi, ❑ King County Assessors Records ;o :4 F-I,o 11.. -1U‘1OTARy �rt,• #/ Signe • i/61' 02L'� Date 8/12/98 i • PUBLIC (Applicant's Representative) J � NOTARY (tt� �WASYr-,-- ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State Wa ington, residing at •ipit.,, 1 r u '7 on the II._ day of t)h , 191Y . Signe G (Notary Public) ,OSN Me-6A.,ovetJ ,No i V-14>{ f u oc,t c . ::.;:.;;:.:::.;::.;;::;:.:>::.::..::.:::.:::.;;;::.:.>::;;:.::;:.;:.:>:.:.:::.;;:.>:.»:.;:.;;:;;:;>::»:.;::.;:.;:;:.:<.;.. ;::C:::itY.o .Ren Uton. ......For. . (:: "'`�were"ma ed.to ;f r:. ca o >::: .:..•. �.#�4:.:::::;:::�... .:..... :::hereb c.ertt. •;:;that no$ices,.of.the P..�..,I�Q$e '�.P..p. :t.:...::.;: : :.;:.:;� ;:.:;;:.;:.;:;:<;.:. :: :::::::<:::.>::<:??::>?:s ::::<.: :: >;:;'•'•:k;:;:;�:;:;:ti: :::::::k ::::;;::is:: ` :;:;:; ;. ss2si ::::<:: :.}:#}:i:+2i:;:::: :<.<::�:::?�:; s: <�::%:::`•,::;::' ;5::::�:;::::;::s:'::..>:..:.....:...:.:......:.::.:.........:. :...:.....:....:::.;::..::...:.:;: • .:...........::: ::::: . : ATTES..;.: .. ::•::.;:: and;:s.worn::::b.efoce><me:>:<:a:::N:ota:r..>;Puhilc��: ..'�an...::fo.:;�t.::e:::.:t.:�..:::Q::.::::::�.::::::::.9t..:::.;:..;;:;:;::. .T....:::Subsc.r..ibe.d.:...:..........:....:::::::::.::::::.:::..::::::.�::: ::.............Y.........:::::::�.:. .>:::,::::....................::. .::..�::::::: :::::::::::::.. .:.,::::..:.......... ;.:.::::;::.;:.::.::<.:: .>:<.. i `':: ? ' `'< 11? }y:;#`?t # l it 11111 ? <1111 1111 ?<`• `•>1111 ::.:::.:................... .....................::.................... :.. • :::::.:::::.;::.::::.::.:.:::: ::. rj°0 7/95 MARILYNoc MA KAMCHEFF 2 REV COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Psi METRO Exchange Building 821 Second j.venue , Seattle,WA 98104 CITY OF ' NTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT#1 200 Mill Av-nue S 601 West Gowe Street Renton,W. 98055 Kent,WA 98032 l PUGET 'STERN,INC. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS &INDUSTRIAL 19515 No Creek Parkway#310 335 116th Avenue SE Bothell,W 98011 Bellevue,WA 98004 PUGET SO D POWER&LIGHT BLACKRIVER 7v Lie P.O.Box 90868 4690 95th Avenue NE Bellevue,W 998009 Bellevue,WA 98004 Earlingt n Business Park Burlington Northern Santa Fe P.O. Box 565048 1700 E Golf Road #400 Dallas, X 75356 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Systems 'ontrol, Inc. The Bridge Group 8656 154th Avenue NE 16443 SE 35th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Bellevue, WA 98008 II King' Cou ty Northwestern Mutual Life Insulrance 506 2nd venue #708m 720 E Wisconsin Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Milwaukee, WI 53202 I Environmental Documents that Uy�Y • Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental documents were prepared fora Special Fill and Grade Permit Lssued for the site under LUA97-046. 4 4 . Development Regulations 1 Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code rf'•,Nrr0� regulations,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire • 1 Code,etc.These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project NOTICE OF APPLICATION impacts. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION I Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1 . The following Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS, M) I Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codas and regulations as cited above.'I 1.Traffic Mittgafioe Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. ' 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-60.52 per square foot of now construction. DATE: eptember 1,1998 j 1 Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Peter Rosen,Project Managei,Development LAND USE NUMBER: A-98-12fi,SA-H,R,ECF Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:0D PM on September 16,1990.This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 27,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, APPLICATION NAME: PERRE GRADY WAY 517E 1055 South Grady,Way,Renton.If you are interested In attending the hearing,please contact the'Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the healing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannel be submitted In PROJECT DESCRIPTION: posal to construct a gas station,convenience store,and a car rental/saleswriting by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal office.The gas station/convenience stor consists of a 1,300 sq.m.building!four fueling Islands covered by a 2,650 sq. before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,1rwlsh to be made a party of record and canopy,end installation of two 20,000 alien underground fuel storage tanks.A building pad of approx.10,000 sq.f. receive additional Infortnalfdn by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7210.Anyone who submits written comments will isproposed for the car rentagsales olfi . Initial construction would include a 5,250 automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project sq.f.one-story building,with me remaining potion planned for future expansion.On-site parking Is proposed for approx.168 cars,10 of these spaces are CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430.7219 allocated to the gas station/convenience-tom with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of driveway access are proposed;two from W Grady Way,one for Oakesdaie'Ave.SW,and a fourth to Powell Ave.SW, from a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hartviare Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION rezone from Commercial Office(CO)to edium Industrial(IM). The proposal Includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office(CD)to Medium Industrial(IM). ' PROJECTI LOCATION: S Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON IGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS ):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton)1as determined that significant en imnmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. '1:2»I i-z.2• _ Therefore.as permitted under the RCW 4.21C.110,the City of Renton is usijrg the Optional DNS(M)process to give • w AS I x e=o' e `< PERMITnotice that a DNS-M dIshdlikelyhto be issued.Comment periods for the roject aad,the proposed DNS-M are d a single comment .T ere will e n comment period of e Threshold APPLICA�ON DATE:SM)DA 1 day appealAperiod following lowethe Issuance orf the DNS-M.DelertninaUon of Into 'I I �\ r e c x x. f:'. • LL p ..'. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION September 1,1998 PermitslReview Requested: SEPA,Site Plan,Rezone,Building) / 1 u -y `a 1 -. Other Permits which may be required: :ludo State,Federal or other agency permits -- .y- I I 1 .•� Requested Studies: • S ornwater Drainage Report;Geotechnlcai Reports 1�) e..- :r Locationwhere application may i I �,�;L: - be reviewed: PlpnningmBuildingwPublic Works Division,Development Services Department, 1 n-d.A+ '• .�Hr , isi 1 55 South Grady Way(sixth foor), enlon,WA 98058 I ,t per}t,, " tfyyyl�p����!!! II PUBLIC HEARING: a dale of Tuesday,October 27,1998,at 9:00 a.m.,has been set fora public i "'' ' s cll'��I-� :+''"9 h wring to review the above-referenced matter.The hearing,before Mr. red I • /' �f • •p` ) p1i�`- ufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on I g.�0.5 �o lh 7th floor of City Hall,Renton,Wa3hinglon. !!_ gr- :+ p CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: xr' � r.:-_„ ;,, Analytical process �I I i --- PA i 1 (( Ij(' ii7rY i rjDii)iiD Project oonsldency refers to whether a pro ed is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in 11 U�.,,.1., their ebs nce,comprehensive plan pollcie,RCW 36.7011110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) i�;iU,,;,; u Include statement of the preliminary date 'nation of a projects consislencylwith the type offend use,leveler , r.v n'It development,Infrastructure.and character of development if one has been made at the lime of notice.At a minimum, p-' ca%i)' every NOA shall Include a determination of the projed's consistency with the Coning,comprehensive plan and • [ \2,f. a=.ifa development regulations. !:I . ... -�C..:xke-_ • Land Use: The site is presently zoned Commercial Office(CO). The proposal Includes a `1 \.. a".;,• p".._i_-:a,.,- ' request to rezone the site from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial (IM). The site is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation andllhe proposed rezone Is consistent with the V designation so no concurrent amendment to the Comprehensive Plan map Ls equired,The proposal meets the development standards of the IM zone. uEnMAloz00c GENNAL02D00 CERTIFICATION • Vli copies of the above • 1 S�,I�dv� �Yl � , hereby certify that 3 p document were iposted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby th described property on Sq-1-, el-. tI qS • Signed: s EST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and r the State of , on the �'J�f'�- day of i i� /�r�r ashington residing 6-8LP�( • • l � I' MARILYN KAMVMCHEFF commas'ON EXPIRES 6/29/99 • -- STY p -. _ O �i 41,71[R LANT0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION ND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF N N-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, M) DATE: September 1,1998 LA D USE NUMBER: LUAI98-126,SA-H,R,ECF AP LIGATION NAME: PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE PR JECT DESCRIPTI N: Proposal to construct a gas station, convenience store, and a car rental/sales office. The gas station/convenience store consists of a 1,300 sq.ft.building,four fueling islands covered by a 2,650 sq. ft.c nopy,and installation of two 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. A building pad of approx. 10,000 sq.ft. Is p oposed for the car ental/sales office. lhitial construction would include a 5,250 sq.ft. one-story building,with the remaining portion plann d for future expansion. On-site parking is proposed for approx.168 cars, 10 of these spaces are allocated to the gas sta ion/convenience store with the remaining 158 for the car rental/sales use. Four new points of , driveway access are proposed;two from SW Grady Way,one for Oakesdale Ave.SW,and a fourth to Powell Ave.SW, frond a 20 foot wide easement through the Eagle Hardware Corporate Office parking lot. The proposal also includes a rezone from Commercia Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(IM). yF• . s The proposal includes a equest to rezone the site from Commercial Office(CO)to Medium Industrial(IM). PR JECT LOCATION: SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW OP IONAL DETERMIN TION OF.NON-SIGINIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Ren on has determined hat significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. The efore,as permitted nder the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of S f w NoniSignificance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. ✓ PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 14,1998 NO ICE OF COMPLET APPLICATION: September 1,1998 Pe its/Review Reque ed: SEPA,Site Plan,Rezone,Building) Oth r Permits which ma be required: Include'State,Federal or other agency permits Requested Studies: Stormwater Drainage Report;Geotechnical Reports Location where applicati n may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way(sixth floor),Renton,WA 98058 PUBLIC HEARING: The date of Tuesday,October 27,1998,at 9:00 a.m.,has been set fora public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing,before Mr.Fred ' Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. CONSISTENCY OVER IEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in theirabsence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of thb preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastruct re,and character ofldevelopment if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations j Land Use: The site is presently zoned Commercial Office (CO). The proposal includes a request to rezone the site from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM),I The site Is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation and the proposed rezone is consistent with the EAV designation so no concurrent amendment to the Comprehensive Plan map Is required. The proposal meets the development standards of the IM zone. . GENrtALO2.DOC Environmental Documents that.. . .__ Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental documents were prepared for a Special Fill and Grade Permit issued for the site under LUA97-046. 1 Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by exit ting codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2. Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new'construction. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 15,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 27,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 I I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I • :rJ • W A S I N G T 0''N i• n a 1 1 I 3a a' a ! i } -y I % r F. z/ m comm. L•tx.1 usraNL OQ ,d ' CIE,,,� rE R , t z J £ Ttu III i E ,x .f... scw.ws\ c u uo "'170 CL TM,M 1 , Wur ST• or i i! co,PORA maa TiEA iOn4 mum1 1 1 AM uom w. t' \ y i11 _VACANT .i .ay t .r,_! gol.t.tie :.1.5iiiii,- . •Li'rc,nrux,v,.xsDT i �L1�• ,--;;;:;,--- pp ..,,,. . r. �--^. .INTER TAT. wy -.,,..a n"�' l� r 3,,, 'u, .,1LL-/i 4 InW- , ,2_ yr. ,� el.I��u _ s.w. [ I6TH sr.1\ i!::1.1 i.• '13 i S jli r rp61bf t'i I =,. < a u yJJ,AJyi,-aLd \' 5 �LI Ei A'Q�'OT Y or.u _ Ei 111 \� 'L,s_i .,•-,.. III -- XlirigrEEZSI i;i \J D- a YPIERRE-CRAW/WAY SITE• ill %=-----1.}---Q:k"-,-'` GENMALO2.DOC CITY � RENT u N ', mad, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner, a or Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator S-ptember 1, 199 M .Vicki Morris Vi ki Morris Consulting Services 7 32- 18th Avenulie NE •S:attle, WA 98115 S BJECT: Pierre Grady Way Site Project No. LUA-98-126,SA-H,R,ECF D-ar Ms. Morris: T e Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the • subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is . a cepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on S ptember 29, 1998. Prior to that;;review, you' will be notified ,if any additional in ormation is required to continue processing your application. T e date of Tuesday, October 27, 1998,'at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing t review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the'7th floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or<representative(s)'of the applicant is required to bg present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff,report'will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at(425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, eter Rosen roject Manager ` cc: . Mr. &Mrs.James Pierre/Owners ccrnm.Doc 1055 South� Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 412%rt.cc.,nr,wr r.,.,tai.,c Fn/rwrvclwd matwrial_20%oust consumer t a 1 I<f;Tw I, ............ [1111,1111112111$11,011.1.11,11. t:::."-•.;:i >:::SE \ CES§:DI.VISI0 . :>: «:,.i:.:::>s: :<:> ;: :<:. >::;::;.:; ;:;:_:...:< :::::: ::::::L :::: :::: ::. ::: ::::::::::: : ::::::::.:ni :: : ::::::::::::: :::::: : ::: ,:: I ::><INF:ORM4T:ON»> »<<> >><;> : .> .T.... Note:;:;If:;there:;is mor thanzone:legal;Owner:please,attach;an;additional:; notariied:MastN.AppMicatwn for.:::each<.:owner . :..: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: James P. and Barbarl Lynn Pierre, _ Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdal6 Husband and Wife PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: SW Grady Way between 11525 Lake City Way NE Oakesdale Ave SW and Powell Ave SW KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY' Seattle, WA ZIP. 98125 918800-0125 and 242304-9110 TELEPHONE NUMBEF: EXISTING LAND USE(S): (206) 64-2200 Undeveloped except for a City of ,Renton Draina e Easement and Pu et Sound Energy >;:>1:::::>::>:::::::« P. .:.LI :>ANT€<: ifg6iher:::>1..han.>;:o.wn:er : ::><>»:><: ::>:::>> :.;;:.;. . .;. Q :.P. .::.: .: .> :. : :::.:::: : : ::.:::::::..::?. .:,,,,, :::::: Systems transmission lines 1 I PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Gasoline service station with mini mart, automobile rentals and used car sales COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area Valley (EAV) ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): No change requested CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: . �,� Commercial Office (CO) `C��T/hl TELEPHONE NUMBER: /► �F1 ���Q� 'v N/t/j� PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): LIN (7 4 ilf G Medium Industrial (IM) /ag CONTACT>: .:. SO ;::::; SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): b NAME: Vicki orris 2.74 acres 119,521 sq ft I COMPANY(if applic We): PROJECT VALUE: Vicki Morri Consulting Services Site work: approximately $700,000 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 7732 18th A enue NE No II III CITY: ZIP: • Seattle; WA 98115 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ' SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No :, • (206) 522-8057 • 5tnea » > > >; > >.:..:;:;>.; : >» ... EGA < .ES.CRLF LNsOFPROPERTY:(Qa h: .e :a.r. ... .e. >.a..::..e. ...s..s . «:«:.:; :::::::: ::::: ::...:.::...........:.::::.:::::::::::::: : . ..: : . ::See Schedute A,. attached (5 pages) . .` `.�I,CATI„�N''&'`FEE.,... > ` > g:,;ti `> €«<>` » '>`>mii•i < »< > :<��::>�<:>:<�� :>::>::::>::::>::»::::::>::;:<:<:<:>::: <:::>:::::>:<�:>: ::::::::>:><;.:::.:: :::�:':� ::-:�:T:Y P E: O F:<>�1 P.P L .0 O S :<wl deermin:e >fe.es> : '» >» >>:> :•;;>::,....... ::>:«<.:: :':::<:>::»::::>::>:<:>:.......:::.::::::Che.ck::. ...:a Ilcati , ., . .e .. ha.t:... 1. .:-;;C.It. :::sta:.:f.::.....i..Idet .................... .... ............................................: ANNEXATION I $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLANAMENDMENT1 $ IX REZONE $ 2,000 _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY' _$ _ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PER T $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ .1•,000 _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FIL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE I $ (FROM ECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ _ _ FINAL ' WETLAND PERMIT $ • ROUTINE VEGETATION IMOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN • $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: I SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ 7 EXEMPTION' $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. $ 500 REVISION I $ N R HIP:>:<::;;>::><::»:><::>: ::<:::: >:<: >>::>>:::>:::>:«:«.>::»::»:>:<»> ::<:::::»:«<:>::>::>:<:;::: «:: I, (Print Name) James P. Pierrre declare that I am (please check one)X the owner of the property involved in this application,_the aut orize repre (tative to act for e operty owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein ontained and a'nformatio a w' submitted are in all respects true and.correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and am-s ' . P.gerre and Barba`a L. Pierre for the State of WA residing a ...•••••‘\it (Na jd of 0 ,fiel�je � s n 0�{ tat' Seattle , on the V `� dirrokN AC+H GIs, J /��� ,I, (Signature of Owner/Represenative) nil (A06once- f°21 6v11 % (Signature of Notary Public) ill %,� p� ' tl :b :>. lt r: taff:.::iit :;::g::;>:,..:>:>:< :; :::>:: .:::;:: ;' ; :::.:::: ':;»::;:�•:>:::;:. ::>::.; .->::;� ::;:::-«:;.. '.: '.Il'hl ::sects o::be..c p ete. :...Y..::..:.:..y:.......:................ .....::.:: :: ::::::..::�..:..::..:..:.:::... .. ...: <:; :..:..... :. � •.::;;>:' _. tf,: :.>: ;::::: ;..; :.::;.:. ..» ::FFs ::>TP<�>SP> :R�'I�.:::��1`, :::..;;::::> :.<: :...... .:::: .Cit :.;FIIe:.Number....:.:::: ... :..:.. ...1 :. .::::..::ECF .,S R.,:.,SH.PL.. CU.:::.:LLA.::.:P:P.::. :::::::::::: • ::::: ::::i.j.::: i] :..: rvi..... : :';><: :< :<:>::»:::::::TOTAL..F:..EES.;:. S:�yv DD >:;;::.;TO.TAL>I?QSTAGE PRQVIDED,..:;$�-':1 : ;;;>, ; �::;::::> . .............:.............:..:.....:::.... ....:....: MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 • Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A I - he land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows : PARCEL A: That ortion of Lot 12 and Tract B of Washington Technical Center, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 122 of Plats, pages 9'8 through 102, inclusive, in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows : That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 3 North; Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as folio J,s : 1 Commencing at tlelnortheast corner of the south 40 feet of Section 13 ; thence north 881115 ' 00" west along the north line of the south 40 feet, distance ;of 854 . 73 feet, more or less, to the west line of Powel.a Avenue Southwest, being the northwest corner of Earlingon Industrial ParklNiumber 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 88 of Plans, page 80, in King County, Washington; thenc : south 1°141' 28" west along the west line of said Earlington Industrial Park Number 2 and its prolongation thereof 1, 810 feet, more or less, to ;the southerly line of the 100 foot Northern Pacific Railway right-of-iway (now Burlington Northern, Inc . ) ; thenc southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 151 .42 feet to the TRUEIPOINT OF BEGINNING; thence continui;ig southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 31 feet; I thenc north 12132 '30" west a distance of 120 feet; thence northeasterly parallel to the southerly line of said I rightlof-way a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to a point which bears north 12°32 '30" west of the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 12132 ' 30" east a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (BEING a portionIof Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARCE B : • A strip of land immediately south of and adjoining the right-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, said strip being more fully described as follows, to-wit : Begi ping at thle ; point of intersection of the south marginal line of the ight-of-wayiof the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Rail ay with the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which bears south 0°15 ' 30" east 556 . 1 feet from the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24 ; . Illegal description, continued) A-1 Policy No. 1093-009591 f SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: thence south 0°15 ' 30" east 138 . 78 feet to a point; thence north 76°13 ' east 135 feet from and parallel to the south marginal line of the right-of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, 1, 385 .27 feet to a point on the east line of said Section 24 ; thence north 0°25 ' west 138 . 78 feet to the intersection of the east line of said Section 24 with the south marginal line of the right-of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, which said point of intersection lies 198 feet south 0°25 ' east from the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thence following said south marginal line of the right-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway south 76°13 ' west _1, 384 . 8 feet to the place of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying easterly of the westerly line of Powell Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by Quit Claim Deed recorded under Recording Number 8309300560 ; (BEING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARCEL C: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°55 ' 12" east along the west side, . 348 .27 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of 'land herein described; thence north 77°29 ' i2" east 438 . 59 feet to an intersection with the northerly margin of the Puget Sound Electric Railroad right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said northerly margin an arc distance of 274 . 18 feet to a point of tangency, the radial line of which bears south 12°30 '48" east for a distance of 741 . 82 feet to the radial center; thence north 77°29 ' 12" east along said northerly margin 672 . 76 feet to the easterly line of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°45 ' 23" east along said east line 25 . 69 feet to the • southerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence south 77°29 ' 12" west along said southerly margin 1, 118 . 28 feet to a point of curve, having a radius of 905 .35 feet, the radial center of which bears south 12°30 '48" east; thence southwesterly, along said curve and south margin an arc. distance of 261 . 61 feet to an intersection with the west line of said southwest .quarter; thence south 0°55 '1 " west 38 . 52 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue So thwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438 . (1 gal description, continued) . A-2 1 1 1 i Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A IEGAL DES.RIPTION, continued: PARCE D: A strip of land 50 feet wide, being 25 feet in width on each side of a centerline of definite location of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) Renton branch, on, over, •acros and through that certain 10 acre tract of land along the northerly side of' the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and part df the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24• in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said ection 24, the centerline being more particularly described as folio s : Begin ing at the point of intersection of the centerline of the definite location, of the Renton branch of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) with the south • line of the 10 acre tract described above which bears south 29°41' west 264 .7 feet from the center of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; thenc in a northeasterly direction as follows : Curvi g to the left by a radius of 716 . 8 feet a distance of 27i . 3 feet to a point; thence north 33717 ' east 345 feet to a point; thence curving to the right by a radius of 716 . 8 feet, a distance of 536 . E feet to alp'oint; thence north 76°1i3 ' east 685 .2 feet to a point on the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washing on, which bears south 0°15 ' east 607 .5 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; • EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale AvenueISouthwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438 . PARCEL E: Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of the 'northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 No th, Range4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0°15 ' 0" east 633 .21 ' feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quart r of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; thenc on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of th Puget Sound Electric Railway' s right-of-way a distance of 117 . 8�9 feet; 1 . thence on a course south 13°47 ' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 .32 feet; thence on a course north 0°13 ' 30" west a distance of 19 . 54 feet to the p int of beginning. 1 (legal description, continued) 1 A-3 Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL F: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4. East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the north line of South 153rd Street with the east line of said northwest quarter of the southeast quarter; thence westerly along said street, 350 feet; thence northerly at right angles to said street line, 800 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way 360 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the east line of said southwest quarter of the northeast .quarter; thence south 860 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying southerly of the northerly line of S .W. Grady Way (Black River Junction-Renton Road; ) AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8804110193 ; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows : Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , 4n King County, Washington, which is south 0°15 '30" east 633 .21 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest • quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24 ; thence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway's right-of-way a distance of 117 . 89 feet; thence on a course south 13°47 ' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 .38 feet; thence on a course north 0°15 ' 30" west a distance of 19 . 54 feet to the point of beginning; • TOGETHER. WITH a 20 foot wide easement for ingress and egress being 10 feet on each side of the following described centerline : Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 'll a distance of 95 .11 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; said beginning. point being on a curve concave to the southeast from whence the radius point bears 'south 0°08 ' 59" west. a distance of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 81.47 feet to a point of tangency; (legal description, continued) • A-4 4 Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A LI GAL DESC IPTION, continued: thence south 1°14 ' 28" west 16 . 67 feet to the point of curvature of a curve o the right having a radius of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesteirly along the arc of said curve 69 . 84 feet to •he point f tangency; ' thence south 77°27 ' 30" west 40.32 feet to the point of curvatur- of a cury to the left having a radius of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 41 .23 feet to she point f tangency; thence south 32°27 ' 30" west 31.28 feet to a point on the northe ly line a d 3 .72 feet from the most northerly corner of Lot 3 of Lct Line A justment 004-83 as recorded under King County Auditor' s • ile Number 8309309001 and the terminus of this description, as disc osed by Kin. County Recording Number 8602280930 . • END OF SCHEDULE A • • II A-5 I _ Drainage Easement 1,1 f.. 3•. .',; deg -6.0044 .'�O ": - ;•:',, . ' 1 AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE 1�AAlIRRRRLL���� � ' :•t�,'r;•.: ;•i; a .. • M,y •• .,.•.: _`• '• . `; • • •• •'...::• • THIS AGREEMENT made. this 1( day of /�10� ► 1985; :• .; � '' "•'-'''• i{ • between PUGET WESTERN, INC... a Washington corpora ion ("Puget ' Western" herein), and CITY OF RENTON, ("Grantee" hem .n); . • .I WHEREAS, Puget Western is the owner of a parcel of land in ` •' the N.E. 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Rage 4 East, ; . W.M.,!Ring County, Washington; and . • • WHEREAS,-Grantee desires an easement for a drainage channel • • • • across Puget Western's land at a location more specifically • . • described herein below; • l' NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and • • other' good and valuable consideration in hand paid receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the • performance by Grantee of the covenants• , terms and conditions ,A� . I hereinafter set forth, Puget Western hereby grants, conveys and - - C- quitclaims to Grantee the following easement: s . ' • • • • '. - t •• 1Q1� A. •• A nonexclusive perpetual easement across, along, in, - • • I QO upon and under that portion of Puget Western's land described in . • ;� �` l Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part ; .,r hereof, for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, i • Q�• v c • I; maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a drainage 11 G�r channel with all connections and _ederground appurtenances ' rc� r,,T� L�' . thereto) (herein the "drainage channel") , together with the ;• `, J'. II! nonexclusive richt of ingress to and egress from said portion of • i. .- • . V i1•• . Puget Western's land for the foregoing purposes . • i The terms "Easement" and "Easement Area" in this instrument . '+ 0 : ( referito the easement on the property described in Exhibit "A". t • • This Easement is granted to and conditioned • upon the subject � po I l ; following terms, conditions and covenants which Grantee hereby . l promises to faithfully and fully observe and perform. . . f. 1. Cost of Construction and Maintenance. Grantee shall • I bear and promptly pay all costs and expenses of construction and • maintenance of the drainage channel. • I I j 1 2. Compliance with Laws and Rules. The Grantee shall • ! I ; 'construct, maintain and use the drainage channel in accordance •.. i with any statute, order, rule or regulation of any public • r i authority having jurisdiction. • ! • 1 .; I 3. Use of the Easement Area by Puget Western. Puget ; Western.reserves the right to develop and use the lane+;; • • . 1 encumbered by this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with • . • • the rights granted herein. Puget Western reserves the right to j construct improvements, such 3s buildings, parking and . landscaping, over portions of the Easement Area upon securing the • • I. consent-cf Grantee, which consent Grantee agrees shall not be • ' unreasonably withheld, having clue regard to Grantee's facilities. • • . i • In nolevont shall Puget Western be allowed to construct a • building at grade over the box culvert. • Puget Western shall not be liable for any loss or damages to Grantee's facilities resulting from Puget Western's use of the • l 'v slencumbered by this easement unless such loss or damage is land • F," -due to negligent acts or omissions of Puget Western. Puget ico, Western agrees to use reasonable care. 1 ! 4. Termination for Cessation of Use. In the event Grantee ' 1 ( ceased to use the drainage channel for its intended use for a fI period of five (5) successive years, this Agreement ;and all' ' �. Grantee's rights hereunder shall terminate and revert to Puget' . I. gtWestern. + • aaii . 5., :"1�",:, ..,.. • ti• g,' Release of Drainage Channel on Termination. No•'%•�: `9 i • i ; , f ination of to a Agreement shall release Grantee from any :? "'. .. F . •, 1 } us ' bility or obligation with roslpect•to.any matter occurrinq•'•�='y' • . .•• • •• . i. , z j ! • . ..e • ,.AM-6023 32185 1 III •1 . . ;\ -.•\ 'i•', ,t \ = rl ..`ice:::�.. ;.;:14 .!'...!% 4—„?:4..,t • • • ••• . ..'2.1 ..•,.,-;;.`,..^...:....4..r...i..!:....:!:...;i4.4.:•.%•..1.A.1.,ss, . . :�::� sip%?%' prior to such termsuclease ination, r ;b ::',”N •r'•;. r:` ''..��.. Grantee from its liabilityobligation nand® y toterremoveothen edraina e • : •• ': ••.: ',,,}A� ••i.••;,• ,'• • .'� cyan facilities ,.• 1.r:••;i - : ; '• ' . . 'channel from Puget Western's parcel and restore the • • 1 ":',:•r':•;:"� :' 6. Removal q t.• :'` of Drainage Channel on Termination. Upon any ( !::::%?;.' termination of this '_ ' Agreement, Grantee shall promptly remove from •{ _ .1 . the Easement Area the drainage channel facilities and restore the ( �' . ground to the condition now existing or, in the alternative, take • such other mutually agreeable measures to minimize the impact of • .; .` the drainage channel on Puget Western's Property. Such work, ` �''' �_ removal and restoration shall be done at the sole cost and • . 'expense of Grantee and in a manner satisfactory to Puget Western. • '. =• ;'• r In case of failure of Grantee to so remove the drainage channel facilities, restore t1he ground or take such other mutually agreed f upon measures, Puget Western may, after reasonable notice to • Grantee, remove the drainage channel facilities, restore the _ ground or take such measures at the expense of Grantee, and Puget "' '!�a`' -J Western shall not be bliable therefor. P • . � 7. Third Party Rights. Pugetall i ▪ �' 9 Western reserves rights • � with respect to its property including, without limitation, the • { right to grant easements, licenses and permits to others subject • }a to the rights granted in this Agreement. O 8. Release and indemnity. : .. " ' r Y• Grantee does hereby release, .q ,. a indemnify and promiselto defend and save harmless Puget Western l ' if from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, .I • .'•.;' ' :-• _- •• Ll expense, actions and elaims, including costs and reasonable : 03 attorney's fees incurred to, Puget Western in defense thereof, ' • asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out �~ 3 of (1) acts or omissions of Grantee and Grantee's servants, r j ' ,• agents, employees, and contractors in the exercise of the rights 1. granted herein, or (2j acts and omissions of Puget Western in its • /(: use of the Property which affect Grantee's employees, agents,contractors, and other parties benefiting from said drainage •1 channel; •provided, hoUever, this paragraph does not prt 1 (• indemnify Puget Western against liability for damagesuarisingoout � I of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or .` . • resulting from the sole negligence of Puget Western or Puget `"�j Western's agents or employees. t i 9. Title. The lights granted herein are subject to • permits, leases, licenses and easements, if any, heretofore granted by Puget Western affectingthe . • i property subject r this . _ oV Agreement. Puget Weatiern does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. ' • I j'.; I 10. Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, notices "•required to he in writing under this Agreement shall be given as A •� .follows: ; • If to Puget Western: Puget Western, Inc. `4:",' �. P.O. Box 0868 ' ".,: Bellevue, Washington 98009-9734 • �_�' { i ' . If to Grantee: City of Renton o r 200 Mill Avenue South • R i Renton, •WA 98055 • ` !• Attn: Director Public Works '• • Notices shall be deemed effective, if mailed, upon second dayfollowingdeposit the ` thereof in the United States Mail, ;{ • postageprepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt • requested, or upon deliver thereof '� Y i f otherwise eve party may change the address to which notices may given. g' Either • .giving notice as above provided. Y given by ` Successors. the rights and obligations of the parties f bnall inure to thu benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. r r I I :%i�.j.�L:y y'' ::r.�,Hf. •r.-S!, -•'• • .••yi•r`.'.\.✓. 'I ,,:\. _...•._..... .. • ... .. ... ..a r..•r�w.r\. ��i.�.Y/.r .' � «l �;,:•: ,r L i a b i • � .r^. 12. 1it1 In the event of any assignment of the ri.," °�` !:; rights hereun ear, the liabilityi +ti. n of Grantee and its aesignoets ;i;'` :y shall be joint and several. `i. • Drainage 1'13. ReleaseofRe_ ntion R qUi emontR. rantee •. •- shall release Puget Western from future drainage retenb_on, �• ;' . . •. componsating1 storage and flood plain requirements and/or �'• -r, restrictions' as related to Puget Western's adjacent property. ' ' EXECUTED as of the date hereinabove set forth. - •• ACCEPTED: CITY OF RENTON PUGET WESTERN, INC. '` �� • Vice re a;'- .By By ,g �• . i j:=.- is , GC STATE OF WASHINGTON) • II . I ) SS. t . • C .COUNTY OF KING ) i! • • •• I On this lVki% day of , 1985, be:ore me, the • . . • i� ;. • • J. 0 undersigned, personally appea ed WM. K. ARTHUR, to me known to be t 1. CO the Vice President of PUGET WESTERN, INC., the corporation that executed the, foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said • . i .instrument] to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said • • corporation,. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on i . • • • 'oath stated ;that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. • i li WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. , ' cifsk k. iii(4.4 i, I . • • ., Notary Public and for ,thei tate of •• i • . i� Washington, re ding at 'X�CI t� • • { t p : '- , • � } � • • •• • • • ii • • : • -3- AM-6023 32185 • 7!'e...;:,::::41..J....* •%•••••••;•••••••••••:*•••,:•....';,..1:'.;•:. ... .• . . '• • • ( __ •••• •: .• .• '• ••••••:::.‘11.,;•.,-.4.. .•••••-: •• • :i:ri • ; .' :t.., •rw • 711 • • ' • EXHIBIT "A" • ; • ..' • ' Legal for permanent drainage easement - Puget Western - Tax • ' • •\,e. . Parcel 4. . A parcel of land being 100 feet in width being 50 feet on each ; - -;" side of the following described centerline and its northerly • ::::::;i, :::. : and southerly extensions all within Section 24, Township 23 - • , • . ' North, Range 4 East, W.M., . Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the Southwest :: . quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section with the northerly ' r right of way line of SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly along said northerly right of way line a distance of 312.09 feet to i the True Point of Beginning of said centerline, thence North ,. 33°20' West a distance of 138 feet more or loss to Puget Sound t Power & Light Company's southerly right of way line and the ; terminus of said centerline; }}; • • • cg0 TOGETHER WITH a parcel of land 120 feet in width being 60 feet , • - • • • q on each`side of the following described centerline and its northerly 1 . 2 and southerly extensions all within Section 24, Township 22 1 • • !t5 North, Range 4 East, W.M., u7 Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the Southwest4 CO i• quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section with the southerly right of way line of SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly along a said'southerly right of way line a distance of 249.57 feet to - 'the True Point of Beginning of said centerline; thence South . 33°20' East a distance of 150 feet more or less to the northerly ' ' . • right of way line of S.R. 405 and the terminus of said centerline; • • TOGLIJALX WITH a trangular shaped parcel of land lying northwesterly -of the following described line; . Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the Southwest • • • quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 • North, Range 4 East with the northerly right of way line of SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly along said northerly right • �c of way line a distance of 261.27 feet to the easterly margin of the previously described 100 foot easement; thence North - • 33°20' West along ;said easterly margin a distance of 76.73 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; thence northeasterly ' • to a point on Puget Sound Power & Light Company's southerly [. • right of way and the terminus of said line; said point bears • ' • • South 75°47' West a distance of 265.0 feet from the intersection of said southerly light of way line and the East line of the • Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 24 • • In City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • • • • :! . • - •• •- •- • —• •••••---•-•••••• ,,..DATUM . I PAGE1 .. Cr 2 ''ont grer...•.:n.• RINF run, TOTPLD RE-GoRD---0Fs u-R-v-Ey- tosalico8 . • : • • NE 1/4 SEC24-TWP23N-R4E. W.M. • • 11c/ . LEGE113 . -7-7-1 ...lat.,ray WAN Krim CZ whirrs • VIP . +=WI;"w I DETAIL v II. P.IM I ----,Tenanvitroara 00 ma Rimer "C st .'."... . in.... M" ' 4 1101 Mgr •••r..4 . i. . • • UT 1. DLO KM%ND ••E •IL4C+jd„"AlornoP.P."134 SIDEVIALX -ENEROACHFENT Et. . I . . _ •••.. . • i r tv144671641 ' % . . ..., s. 0....-MAL . l, •.• ePFg=6Oi=Orl gPlT:0A r T,•.)4..iz„w.P.,r.a1..3..2.7.7,4m 3Se:oP.1rSsAAStN=nCNo-•P-O APANWO".00IOl M PI • •• PITS :. • • PARE...:E..L....'.. W.".. OO_M ...‘ 1• • o.r .:...•I,.cA..411.1111i1,,giP 1i4r.,i.r,7*'1A.6$I•1 A 4\S E .'. ii1 f CET A L A I• • •ev , .7r•D. "o.•i. l f IM • ill 5,1 LEM • ....... ___------ ,...-- wr. . Al Kr .. . ., wo out ••I • PARCEL p „ .: Eolo ......,...-- .-- . i H . EQUIPMENT USED tvil ST,ifi" • % • . rS1.1 ...s.0010‘1°•01.• '‘. ' .' • crun tc MALE ....4 A • ..P"-- •DP/ • .• • • ••. . .,....,.•10/111 • ......................../.....11i.1 ..O.'I. lam. 441 mos,. . . ......, . „„ • ••• >0 .ti•..:-'''..;„.;;Tir . • • '• 110LITVIO. WASELL AND ASSOCIATES S.•.0/ HO. LAND BBBBBB MD ' DUO/NNOIPIDININCI NairONT AI 1 0. 0;00°0111'. • . PO WM MP IMP DUI WOW.ADAJOLAK O.P.M. 0.0•••••01 • • 13.6•51SarroMM . • OM IMP %P.& Mg • -AP Egreit MireA*3' • RECOIDITO CERTIFICATE SLITVEYDTS CERT'TATE FUI nano mfr.r leu-a•..L••are i.•-••• 1N•••••••••••0••••••••••I•••••••e••.••.rem.. ., • 1121CDOWL1- • r W GP AO POMO wo.o.•••••••••41 AV.••San..,,Pi/WO j i 1-C........-• P mut--•P am.r.......g____ ,,,,...,....,...REV.0MM IC • WOO W . • WAWA PAWPAW -a. alc•••or.513/11. -..--•"1_-- 41 WM arm.'•BLIJIS ,Il 4.,, ....511•13nLC moan Mrirem=srull ups ou•••••• D il ow.. • . • • • • •• • • • . • . • • 1 I Project Narrative I . Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW i The Pierre Grady Way site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW is 2.74 acres in size (119,354 sf), The prope fronts on SW Grady Way, and extends east/west between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue W. The site has no significant natural features. The Pierre Grady Way site is currently vacant, with the exception of high voltage power lines that pass through in an'least/west direction, and north/south electrical distribution lines that convey power from the high voltage lines for local use. The metal towers, plinths, wood utility poles guy wires aid guy wire anchors are fixed features. At the time of this application, the owner was negotiate g a contract w tli Puget Sound Energy Services to place some power lines undergroun , and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated is to bury the east/west power lines from the end of the o en drainage channel to Powell Avenue SW, and relocate the north/south power lines offs to to the west I ' Fill was placed on the Pierre Grady Way property in 1997. City of Renton Grading Licen a B- 970552 was obtained to bring the site up to grade with surrounding streets and sidewalks. A subsurface stormwater conveyance system was installed in a former open drainage channel through the property during the fill and grade action. Approximately 100 feet of the open channel remains at the west end of property, adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. Channel side slopes have been reinforced with gabion walls. The channel bottom and side slopes have been seeded with grass to provide biofiltration— stormwater quality treatment prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. The site is approximately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, and separated from this drainage course by the Oakesdale Avenue SW right-of-way (a 5-lane section with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides). The proposal includes!constructing a gasoline service station, mini mart (convenience store), and car rent sales office on the site with associated utilities, parking and landscaping. Preferred tenants with wh m the owner is jnegotiating include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The mini mart propose in the southwest corner of the site will be a one-story building, with a footprint approximately 1,300 sf in size. Four fueling islands are proposed, to be covered by a canopy approximately 2,650 sf in area and just under 20 ft high. A building pad approximately 10,000,sf in size is proposed on the northern parcel. Initial construction includes building slightly more than half of this single-story structure (5,250 sf) at the east end of the footprint to be occupied by the car rental/sales operation. The remaining portion of the building footprint area (4,480 sf) is planned as a possible ' ture expansion area for the car rental/sales agency, and is not part of the current Site Plan Approv application. Total impervious surface area on the site will be approximately 89,751 sf(75%). 1 Ons to parking is proposed for approximately 168 cars. Ten of these spaces are allocated t' the gas stati n/mini mart, and:the remaining 158 spaces are proposed for the car rental/sales use. The proposed number of parking spaces exceeds City of Renton minimum requirements for the proposed uses, which total 7 spaces for the mini mart and 41 spaces for the car rental/sales use. Based on the applican is long-standing experience in the car sales business, and the proportionately small size of the site for car rental/sales operation, the larger number of spaces is needed. In the event that the DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 3 1 1998 RECEIVED a _ • Enterprise future expansion area is constructed. at some future time, onsite parking for the car rental/sales use will be reduced to approximately 146 spaces — still well above minimum Code • requirements, and satisfactory for the proposed uses. The additional parking to be provided does not compromise any other known Code requirements or site amenities(e.g., landscaping). No onsite vehicle maintenance is contemplated by either Chevron or Enterprise Rent-a-Car. Vehicle washing is proposed associated with the car rental/sales use only, and will occur in an enclosed garage-like room at the rear of the structure, equipped with a drainage collection system that will discharge to the sanitary sewer. The proposal includes installing two 20,000-gallon UL-rated underground fuel storage tanks associated with the gas station use. These will be constructed, installed and operated in accordance with Washington Department of Ecology standards and other applicable regulations. One 20,000- gallon tank will be used for regular unleaded gasoline. The other 20,000-gallon tank will be segregated into two compartments: approximately 14,000-gallon-capacity for supreme unleaded gasoline and 6,000-gallon-capacity for diesel fuel. The tanks will be double-walled fiberglass construction. The outer wall will provide redundancy to the inner wall, in the event of a spill or leak. A leak detection monitoring system will be installed and wired for notification inside the mini mart building. Mini mart employees will be alerted by this system to potential dangers or leaks associated with the underground fuel storage tanks, and will be trained in appropriate emergency response procedures. Four new points of driveway access to the site are proposed: two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Avenue SW, and a fourth at the northeast corner of the site. Access to/from Powell Avenue SW will be provided in an existing 20-ft wide easement through the Eagle Hardware corporate office parking lot. The applicant requests modification of City of Renton commercial driveway width standards for the westernmost Grady Way driveway apron. In order to accommodate fuel tanker trucks to service the gas station,this driveway is proposed to be 40 feet wide rather than 30 feet. Public right-of-way landscaping and onsite landscaping to be provided will exceed City of Renton minimum requirements. The proposed Landscaping Plan indicates plantings over approximately 25 percent (29,11603 sf) of the site. The proposal includes landscaping for wildlife, in accordance with the City's agreement with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service for all development in the Green River Valley. Plants suitable for wildlife habitat are proposed in an area approximately 6,590 sf in size, along the northwest L-shaped border with a natural area retained on adjacent commercial property. This area totals 5.5 percent of the Pierre Grady Way site, compared to the minimum 2 percent requirement. Implementation of the proposal will not obstruct views from existing structures. The Extended Stay of America (ESA) hotel adjacent to the northwest corner of the site is a 3-story structure, oriented in an eat/west direction. No significant windows overlook the site to the south. Vegetation retained in a natural area used by ESA for stormwater detention substantially screens views between these two properties. An Eagle Hardware corporate office borders the northeast corner of the Pierre Grady Way site. This structure is also three stories high, compared to the one-story car rentaysales office proposed on the Pierre Grady Way site. The car rental/sales office is"proposed west of the Eagle Hardware corporate office, between the two offsite three-story buildings. 2 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Project Narrative: Revised 8/24/98 I CITY Ur KmixIL n � , -- UG14 '1BB IsI RECEIVED 1 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW I ames and Barbara LynnPierre, owners of the Pierre GradyWaysiteOakesdale venue @ SW, request rezone of a 2.74-acre parcel from CO — Commercial Office, to IM—Medium Industrial, to pe ''t site development for a gas station with mini mart, and car rental/used car sales operation. Tenants with whom they'are negotiating for these uses include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The sit is located on the north side of SW Grady Way, between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW, in the Employment Area—Valley designation. I Site Zoning and Comprehensive Plan History i City of RentonEconomic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department staff researched the Pierre Grady Way site zoning and Comprehensive Plan history, and reported this information to a representative of the applicant (see letter to Vicki Morris Consulting Services dated J ly 23, 1998; dopy attached). Staff findings are reported below. Current zoning (CO — 1 Comma cial Office) preceded the last Comprehensive Plan amendment and implementing zoning, and th re is no evidence that reclassification to Medium Industrial (IM) zoning has been previously considered. 1 985-1992. The Comprehensive Plan designation of the site duringthis erioc was � P g P Manufal�turing Park/MMultiple Option. This designation allowed industrial, service commercial and office uses. Corresponding zoning in 1992 was Office Park on the northern parcel; and Manufal turing Park over the remainder of the site adjacent to the north side of SW Grady Way. 1 993. In 1993, the City of Renton issued an interim Comprehensive Plan as a firs step toward adopting Growth Management Act (GMA) policies. At that time, the land use designa ion Employment Area—Office was applied to the Pierre Grady Way site, with corresponding Commercial Office(CO) zoning (Ordinance 4404, June 1993). I 1994. Puget Power, property owner prior to James and Barbara Lynn Pierre, requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1994, to change the Employment Area—Office designation to Employment Area—Commercial, with corresponding Commercial Arterial (AC) zoning. This request was denied. 1995. The City'sl final GMA Comprehensive Plan update was adopted in 1995. The final plan m intained the Employment Area—Office designation for the property, with corresponding Comme cial Office(C6I) zoning. 1I 1996. A City-iinitiated Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1996 revised the Pierre Grady Way site land use designation to Employment Area—Valley. This was an area-wide amendment affecting nearly all of Oe valley, for which the purpose was to allow a range of commercial, office and industrial zones. Commercial Office zoning was maintained on the Pierre Grady Way Site at the time of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan amendment. i �I , Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Recent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes On January 24, 1997, James Pierre initiated a Medium Industrial (IM) Rezone and Site Plan Approval application with the City of Renton by requesting a Preliminary Project Review Meeting. At that time, the site development proposal included a three-story office building on the southwest corner of the property, and a car rental agency in the northern portion. Rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM) was requested. The Memorandum of comment prepared by the City of Renton Long Range Planning staff(February 11, 1997), noted overall consistency between the proposal and the Comprehensive Plan. The only area of potential inconsistency was cited as the need to provide safe, convenient pedestrian access from the sidewalk to the proposed office building—less a matter of Comprehensive Plan inconsistency than a site plan review comment. James Pierre carefully considered the appropriate zone to request for the uses for which he had prospective tenants. Over the course of the year following the initial Preliminary Project Review meeting, the rental car agency decided against a corporate office on the site, and James Pierre initiated communications with a gas station/mini mart tenant for the southwest corner of the property. The ability to permit a gas station, mini mart, and car rental agency was examined in three zones: Commercial Office (existing zoning); Arterial Commercial (CA); and Medium Industrial. Automobile rental/sales is a prohibited use in the CO (existing) zone. CA zoning was geographically unavailable to site. The February 11, 1997 Long Range Planning Memo cited Comprehensive Plan Policy LY-212.14, "Favorable consideration should be given to rezones to Commercial Arterial(CA) only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 27th Street." Therefore, IM zoning was selected. Automobile rental/leasing was a primary permitted use, and gasoline service stations were a secondary permitted use subject to Site Plan Approval. There was no mention of mini marts in the IM zone text. In the Fall of 1997, discussions were initiated with City of Renton Long Range Planning staff to confirm the appropriate zone to request for the proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses. We learned that a Comprehensive Plan amendment was forthcoming to remove the CA zone geographic constraint north of I-405 in the Employment Area—Valley designation, on the condition that rezone applications encompass a minimum of 5 acres. This zone remains unavailable to the Pierre Grady Way site, which is only 2.74 acres in size. Staff interpretation was requested concerning the absence of Land Use Code discussion of mini marts in the IM zone. Staff acknowledged the new market trend to develop gas stations with an associated convenience store, and considered it a possible oversight or need for Code update. They were in the process of assembling City-wide Land Use Code issues related to gas stations, vehicle service, accessory uses, and screening requirements for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. The December 30, 1997 Commission briefing paper disclosed that this work program came about in part as a result of inquiries from a property owner [James Pierre] interested in requesting a 2 8/14/98 \ 1 ' ` 1 Justification for Rezone ' Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale I I rezone from CO to.IM to develop a gas station with mini mart and auto leasing business along Grady ay. The applicant attended Planning Commission meetings in Spring 1998 to answer questio s and provide information. Land Use Code amendments effective April 15, 1998 resulted in the f 'lowing changes in the zones of interest to the Pierre Grady Way site: I 1 NEW NEW USE CHANGED FROM I. ZONE ' PROHIBITED USE ALLOWANCE SECONDARY TO PRIMARY USE Commercial Arterial I Gas stations, Commercial Office I Gas stations Medium Industrial Mini marts as primary Gas station permitted use I With the April 15, 1998 Land Use Code amendments, all three.proposed uses on the Pierre Grady Way site are primary permitted uses in the requested IM zone, and all are prohibited in the existing CO zone. Given the sequence and content of City-wide Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Code amendments that have occurred between 1996 and the time of this application, each of which has been supportive of the proposed uses in the requested IM zone at this loc tion, the current application for rezone is timely. In further support of this request, properties east and west of the site on the north side of SW Grady Way are currently zoned IM, and a considerable amount of IM zoning extends northeastward from the site, above the intersection of Powell Avenue SW with SW Grady Way (see the G2 current zoning map that accompanies the July 23, 1998 City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Department Metter attached to this Justification for Rezone). 1 I Consist ncy with the Comprehensive Plan The City of Renton Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Preliminary Project Review Memorandum concerning the current Pierre Grady Way Site Rezone request and Site Plan Approv l application (April 14, 1998) reported "no inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan," and found that IThe proposed commercial uses fall within the range of uses indicated for the [Comprehensive Plan] designation [Employment Area—Valley (EAV)]". The Memo lists specific Fomprehensive Plan policies reviewed in relation to this proposal. These are cited below. Comme is that follow are offered by the applicant. The analysis supports a determination that the propert�is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested, pursuant to policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and recent supportive Land Use Code amendments, described above. Policy li U-212.1 Develop;the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and vari•ty of commercial) office, and industrial uses. ' . i 3 8/14/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses are not available in the northwest quadrant of the city that includes the Pierre Grady Way site. Implementation of these uses will increase the range and variety of uses, and introduce services to motorists along the SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW arterial corridors. Policy LU 212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency will be compatible in character (scale, appearance) and supportive in terms of services offered to existing land uses in the area. The gas station will be a complementary use to the onsite rental car agency. Both uses are likely to serve the adjacent Extended Stay o America hotel, and the office and light industrial parks to the north and northeast. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Good access and high visibility are important attributes of the site for the proposed uses. The intensity of locating in such close proximity to heavily traveled arterials could be less desirable for commercial office uses. Recent Land Use Code amendments support gas stations, mini marts and car rental/sales agencies as primary permitted uses in the City's industrial zones. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasonable buffering between the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deliveries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained The proposed site plan complies with all required setbacks, and includes providing perimeter landscape buffers. Natural plantings for wildlife habitat are proposed in the northwest corner of the site, adjacent to an area of natural vegetation retained on the Extended Stay of America hotel property. These features will maintain ai significant visual buffer between the gas station/mini mart and the hotel. Fuel tanker truck access to the site is proposed from the westernmost driveway on SW Grady Way. Policy LU-212.11 Changes in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to another should be considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse land use impacts may be taken into account. Selecting tenants and de eloping a site plan in accordance with all applicable City of Renton development standards was a significant challenge for the Pierre Grady Way site, due to the narrow 4 8/14/98 I - Justification for Rezone ; Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale I and ire lar configuration of the property, required setbacks, existing utility easements and overhead powerlines. The site has remained vacant since annexation to the City of Renton in April 1959. jThere is no e'idence of historical development on the property other than a railroad embankment and drainage channel — modified at the time of the 1997 grade and fill action, and electrical power transmiSsion/distribution Tines. The proposal constitutes an efficient use of the property, and will reate jobs and tax revenues for the City of Renton. The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rentaVsales agency ' increase the balance of uses in the vicinity, as described above following Policy LU-21i2.1. Policy U-212.12 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/or compatible uses are already located in the area. Oth r auto-related uses exist to the east along the SW Grady Way corridor, and properties adjacent to the site, along the north side of SW Grady Way, are currently zoned IM. Policy LU-212.13 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones where there is an opportunity to create improved efficiencies of use through the joint use/sharing of onsite facilities such as parking, open sp ce and supporting services. See the discussion that follows Policy LU-212.2, above. Policy U-212.16 Favorable consideration may be given to rezones to industrial uses when a mix or wider r ge of uses is nit yet appropriate for a site. See he discussion that follows Policy LU-212.8 and LU-212.11, above. Policy ,U-212.21 Ye l icular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. 1 1 The proposed site;plan includes vehicular connections between the onsite parking areas of the gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency, and the offsite parking area of the agle Hardware corporate office. A northeast access drive is proposed between the site and P well Avenue SW, through the*Eagle Hardware corporate office parking lot, in an existing 20-ft riide access a Bement executed,December 20, 1985. Signific nt Material Change rade and Filly Action. James and Barbara Lynn Pierre purchased the Grady Way @ Oakesd a Avenue SW property from Puget Sound Energy Services in 1996. In 1997, they applied for and received a City of Renton Special Fill and Grade Permit (File LUA 97-046, SP) and Gr ding License (No. 970552) to place approximately 15,000 cy of fill on the property to bring it up totrade with adjacent streets. The permit application and SEPA Checklist that accompanied the application 1 5 8/14/98 Justification for Rezone Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale disclosed the likely development proposal for the site, as described in paragraph one of the Recent Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Changes section of this Justification for Rezone. Based on communications with and permissions received from the City to-date, which have all been supportive of the project,the owners incurred the expense to proceed with the fill and grade action. Storm Drainage Modifications. The 1997 fill and grade action included leveling the former railroad embankment through the northern parcel, and installing a subsurface drainage collection system (twin 48-inch culverts) where an open drainage channel had previously bisected the site. This action was closely coordinated with the City of Renton, which owns the drainage easement, and with the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. Approximately 100 feet at the west end of the drainage channel was left open, with a vegetated bottom and side slopes, for water quality enhancement prior to stormwater discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. Transportation System Improvements. Oakesdale Avenue SW currently terminates approximately one block south of SW Grady Way. During 1998, the City of Renton began constructing a southward extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW to SW 27th Street. It is expected that this construction will be complete by November 1998. The second phase of this roadway project is scheduled to complete Oakesdale Avenue SW as a through-route to SW 29th Street in 1999. Oakesdale Avenue SW is expected to receive considerable use as an alternate route to the I-405/SR- 167 interchange. The services proposed for the Pierre Grady Way site—gas station, mini mart, and car rental/sales agency — are not currently available in the northwest quadrant of the City, and will be conveniently accessible to motorists in the SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW arterial corridors. Public Health, Safety&Welfare Neither the rezone action nor development and operation of the proposed uses are expected to adversely impact conditions of public health, safety or welfare in the site vicinity. While the operation of a gas station will have more associated risk of fire or explosion than the vacant site, there are numerous Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable regulations with which the owner/operator will comply to minimize these risks. There are no sensitive contiguous land uses (such as a public school, day care center, medical facility, residence, etc.). At the time of this application,the.owner was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound Energy Services to place some powerlines underground and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated will result in burying the east-west powerlines from the east end of the open drainage channel to Powell Avenue SW, and relocating the north-south powerlines offsite to the west. These actions, if implemented by Puget Sound Energy at the owners' expense,will improve onsite conditions of safety. 6 8/14/98 CIT' 3F RENTpN ' Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Panning Jesse Tanner,Mayor i 1 Susan Carlson,Administrator July 23, 1998 Vic 'Morris Vic 'Morris Consulting Services 773 18th Ave.NE Sea e,WA 98115-426 SUBJECT: PREVIOUS ZONING-GRADY WAY SITE AT OAKESDALE Dear Vicki: Per your request, her is some background about the previous and current Comprehensive Plan� designations and zoning for your site located on the north side of Grady Way S. between Oakesdale Ave. SW and Powell Ave. SW: 1 • Comprehensive Plan land use designation 1985 to 1992-Manufacturing Park//Multiple Option (allowed industrial; service commercial, and office). Corresponding zoning verified for 199 - northern rectangular portion of property zoned Office Park (O-P), remainder abutting y Way S. zoned Manufacturing Park(M-P). A portion of the 1992 zoning map is enclosed. • omprehensive Plan Update, Interim Plan 1993 - applied Employment Area - Offi to all of the property. Corresponding zoning-Commercial Office. i • Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, 1994, by Puget Power - proposal to change designation from Employment Area - Office to Employment Area - Commercial 'th corresponding zoning of Commercial Arterial. Request denied. • Comprehensive Fran Update, Final Plan, 1995 - Maintained Employment Area - Office designation to all of property. Corresponding zoning-Commercial Office. • Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1996 - redesignated property to Employment Area -Valley. riinpproved as an area wide amendment affecting nearly all of the valley. Purpose to allow for x of commercial; office and industrial uses. The policies allow for a range of implementing commercial, oice and industrial zones. Corresponding zoning maintained for subject property-Commercial Office.A portion of the 1998 zoning map is enclosed. We did not receive atil y Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests for the subject property in 1997 or 1998. If you have;any further questions, please give me a call (425) 430-6578, or contact Rebecca Lind at(425)430-6588. Sin I rely, isa Grueter, Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind i 1I H:\STRATPLA\PLANNINGILGRUETER\VMORRIS.DOC 200;Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 1 all This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer . . ...- ....... Cu`f-GF-R-ENT aN \ i,,,, ,:.,f.,,x44,„,-.4,Kki ;, ., ' .7t 1-" ''''S'''': '''' :i :;C:•. ': ' ' . P-1 ZONING MAP • 1...: :',.:.','2,:.'IW,,.,',. :•.•-,:?:. z ZONING MAP LEGEND ::•'.-:i-,.1::',: rp.-. .r..::::: : cr) -- • ul SYMBOL DISTRICT USE ":,1' .•'..'; :.'•' . : > .3::,•-:•,:•:,-, -.'<(••1:1—P -cc M—P *,, :P.is'z,,, :' ' i fi) "-.: G-1 RESIDEN_T_IAL — SINGLE—EAM ILY_ 'i,::,:•• .: ,:i RESIDENTIAL — SINGLE—FAMILY R-1 -- _ _ _ — -, . P-1 ilk‘<(\'%' (X) :, : ' „'-'''--.-- II a R-2 RESIDENTIAL — TWO—FAMILY R-3 RESIDENTIAL — MULTIPLE—FAMILY / lir611 61., 'C::: :::::\, ,•;,t\., :":,,,. 1' 'no RESIDENTIAL — MULTIPLE—FAMILY V6-: ;....::: •.,,:'*.e. . .:" c,i, .,r."..;i4.:',i,:i:•?:::,.: —7'.'' BUSINESS USE ;'kr,,i,IA • 41311111SSIDOMMIT. O—P OFFICE PARK t%11 '. 041 11'14'111‘flirL,' , Lit111.18v 1 li417.1?":64;:iiL'Ail,111 . irl ''' lj,i:f!:',1:?;,,,, I:1—P E .r'LI L1-4.,,! LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 1 lit,I3 ill:fill7041,,o.1, r,;.:1/ ‘,,149h11,;:, ;4,,,V 0 il;i 1100111111 _,0- ifig:,,, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ilk II',0 :d!,'4, iplir1,fi .:litelr 11, ,i ;,:.!:,,,. ,J:,, l' '' P r''' 4,;i 6 4'1•Li11,4 ,';Ili", -'3 ,., litiral TRAILER PARK ;':j''',1,iiiViiii .). 3 r.24 IIIII .1111:';''':Yil,,i0 ',''' '31'i'' '1.,pIfil p 01111: 1 ,,,. . .1 SI „ ioi.'P4,;,1080,1p,,4,,I ' , . (n— o 0 z—1 ---.... CITY LIMITS • 111•111 1 ey. kim:,,,%!., %..04,006,!Iiii+kt. 1 L, 1 ,,,:,,e5, :,,,vdttionoqt, ''1!0' ',, r ,r:'piln00 ill, r1:;11,,' z>0 z La'1:11 ri'ov;r0 00:k li.i 1,,,0 1,,,,:, „,lir''1' 0—P I—z"1 / Nam= iiill'l'''11$14,04,1,4,4ilt1,/tL0M4Sil,;,,,1:1,0 1,iiiiiiiir,1: 1141 1[11, 1, irlo. ,, .." i1 : , 1,il 0 o : -<0'0 73 o IMPORTANT CHECK EACH REZONE ORDINANCE FOR POSSIBLE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • A 4 1 -. PAGE m 'V 43) 111 ,r0,1.,15v,t4,-124. „,,,,,, ,e. , 1,g441 .. ,,,,, '1.,, , 101 3,T„457"), ,li,1,,,. k4,,i,,,;LI h,1 , fr il.,' ' 0 . ira,1 1 1,1 1 °0010, 1 $1$.iy.it 011,N14 — .:.. — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DWISION 24-1.3' - 335 40"1.-044,44,,.,h1100rt10:10.,IMN, ylt ,1,i1 .1 li Nil.11,,t mi t'1*0 IA 0 yal,.ilid,r00,1,,Alpo 1:.:lip, 11',0,,or,', -L- T DATE. gr/2o7-9 2- r,•L'.',f',,,,i,:,,..1ii It!,,14 A;,1:P1-,!4 '1424.10,141 ,.., 4324 PAP&DRANdIIG If P/71/1.14 TEONICAL MTV=SECTION F2 - 13 T23N R4E E 1/2 , � — M I I . ;) z ---I M 1- ( 1 C❑ ,// , s 7th St. 1 CCP C❑ U -- __ � �1 - , 1 U - - _ ii IMF d , i -- - � r II� � fM \ \ai � ' `1' ! 0 if P-1 \ c '\\ 1 I--'---A-\ —1 \ \A 1 i ` IM W. LIM // Tk ,-3 /C�a I-405 ; w � _ - , - �� IC- - 1 1 1 IM \, 'r} SW' 16thSt. ------i SW i - I ' N , .. CQ CGr0 , ---____. - ; ._ ,_._ ___ ______ \ a--1 c4 i /\\NN • s I ' S: fI2 . 25T23NR4EE1/2 °®° G2 �� ZONING 1"'O0 p' 0i"'swim 24 T23N R4E E 1/2. F�, Ol/16J9e cA , y I :..:.......:..: :si:.;:.;:.>::i::i::i::i:: ;n;!iisiiccri:ii;i::; iiiiii:>::::.i::i ::;;c; ::ii::>:::i: . : i::: CITY:OF..:RENTON>>:• <><«»>><«<� «.'<''.«'<�">«�..«««« >««<>:'><>«<`' <�< < >�> <,< ><< :.::.::.:::.::.::.:::: ::<::::;:;: : :::::>:;;: >: :>::»:.>::>:::.>:.>:.>::»:>::>:>::::::»;>::>:gRM .>�?��E�O)p1VENTS1✓�.''�C1rSuS14�N:: >'>:>:»:.;.;:.;:.:.i::;::i:: :.;:.i;i i:;::i::i i::;..;.:::.;. i;:.: :.;.;:: iftnigii . : ENVIRONMENTAL'CHE.CK .FIST..................................... ...... :::..;:..:.i:isi.i:i::*::::::::i:::.i:i:i:::::iii;i:i:„...:.> :.:::::::,...:::...::::::::::::::.::::::.:::::::.::::::.:.::::::::.::::::: ...„,: .....;::;:::::::.;::.;:;:.:::.:.;:.i:::: i; is ii:: i.:::::::::::ii; .;.;. PURPOSE OF CHECKLISjT: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider. the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purrose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts fro , your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency ecide whether EIS is required INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: II This en ronmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governitiental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descriptions you can., - 1 , You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some q estions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark design tions. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply,to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal ,or its environmental effects. Thie agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide alditional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. I I A. BACKGROUND Dom' M p 1. .Name of proposed project: OFREN D�fV/Atea . AUG 3 . Pierre Grady Way Site at Oakesdale Avenue SW 1 1998 2. Name of applicant ' . James and Barbara Lynn Pierre . , ORIGINAL i 1 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application • SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner/Applicant: I Contact Person: James and Barbara Lynn Pierre Vicki Morris 11525 Lake City Way NE Vicki Morris Consulting Services Seattle,WA 98125 7732 18th Avenue NE (206)364-2200 Seattle,WA 98115 (206) 522-8057 4. Date checklist prepared: Revised August 31, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton,Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Submit Rezone/Site Plan Approval application Summer 1998 Place east-west PSE electrical distribution lines underground Summer 1998 Relocate north-south PSE electrical distribution lines offsite Summer 1998 Receive Rezone and Site Plan Approval November 1998 Receive Construction Permits January 1999 Perform pre-construction grading Spring 1999 Construct site utilities Spring 1999 Construct buildings Spring 1999 Perform final grading, paving, and landscaping Late Summer 1999 Occupy the site Late Summer 1999 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposaf? If yes,explain. The site plan.(Figure 1) identifies FUTURE SPACE (a 4,480 sf building pad) adjacent to the west side of the Enterprise car rental/sales building. This possible future expansion area for Enterprise is not part of the current Site'Plan Approval application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. American Engineering Corporation. July 21, 1998. Technical Information Report: Stormwater Drainage kJamie e Pierre' ady Way at Oakesdale Site. Prepared for James and Barbara Pierre, Owners!' ? 2 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 i t if •' American Engineering Corporation. July 9, 1998. Addendum to Grading and Fill Close-out Report. Prepared for Dykeman Architects. Reproduced in Grading and Fill Close-out Report. American Engineering Corporation. February 26, 1998. Jamie Pierre Grady Way Site: Grading and Fill Close-Out Report. City of Renton Grading Permit B970552. Prepared for Jamie Pierre, Owner. Ii Am rican Engineering Corporation. April 1997. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Jamie Pi rre SW Grady Way Site. Prepared for Jamie Pierre, Owner. I City of Renton and Puget Western, Inc. May 16, 1985. Agreement and Easement for a Drainage Channel across Puget Western's land in the NE 'A Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,King County, Washington. City, of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum. April 16, 1998. Pierre Grady Way Site Preapplication Review,File#98-024. 1 City of Renton PlanningBuilding/Public Works Memorandum. April 14,1998. Pierre Grady Way Site Preapplication Review,File#98-24—Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning comments. I Mic ael R. Birdsall' and Associates. May 29, 1998. Trip Generation and Traffic Impact Fee Estimate: Jamie Pierre i Development Proposal, Grady Way @ Oakesdale Avenue, Renton, Washington. Technical Reports prepared for site conditions prior to 1997 fill placement of fill, already on file with the City of Renton:I, LUA-97-046 SP,EFC,and Grading License B-970552. These reports no longer address existing (1998) site conditions, and therefore have not been resubmitted for consideration in relation;to the Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application: Environmental Hazards Control. September 1996. Environmental Assessment, Phase I and phase II, ParcOs A, B, C, D, E and F, Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,King County,Renton,Washington. Prepared for Pierre Enterprises,Inc. John Comis Associates. September 1996. Wetland Verification Report for the Puget Western Site at -SW Grady Way in Renton. Prepared for Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties, Inc., Owner's Representative. Tay 9r Associates. July 9, 1997. Memorandum re: Potential for Fish to Access the Pierre Grady Way Site Stormwater Ditch/Tributary to Springbrook Creek. Prepared for Jamie Pierre, Owner; Don Moody,Western Pacific Properties,Inc.;and Vicki Morris Consulting Services. Vicki Morris Consulting Services. April 4, 1997. Environmental Checklist: Pierre Grady Way Site at O esdale Avenue SW: Grade and Fill Permit Application. ' , 3 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakee�dale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Applid'ation SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 i l i I � V Washington Department of Fish& Wildlife: July 11, 1997. Letter prepared by Philip Schneider, Habitat Biologist, to Mark Pywell, City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works, re: Determination of Non-Significance, Pierre Fill and Grade LUS-97-046, ECF, SP, on a Tributary to Springbrook Creek. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. There are no applications pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by the gasoline service station/mini mart/rental car agency proposal. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. City of Renton approvals and permits: Rezone from Commercial Office(CO) to Medium Industrial(IM) Site Plan Approval Environmental Review Engineering Plan Approval Construction Permits: Utilities and Site Work Gasoline Tank and Piping Installation Permits 1 Building Permits Tenant Improvement Permits Sign Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal includes constructing a gasoline service station, mini mart (convenience store), and car rental/sales office on the site with associated utilities, parking and landscaping (see Figure 1). Preferred tenants with whom the owner is negotiating include Chevron and Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The mini mart proposed in the southwest corner of the site will be a two-story building, approximately 1,300 sf in size. The canopy over four proposed fueling islands will be approximately 2,650 sf in area, approximately 19-ft 6-in high. A building pad approximately 10,000 sf in size is proposed on the northern parcel. Initial construction includes building slightly more than one-half of this single-story structure (5,250 sf) at the east end of the footprint to be occupied by the car rental/sales operation. The remaining portion of the building footprint area(4,480 sf)is planned as a possible future expansion area for the car rental/sales agency, and is not part of the current Site Plan Approval application. Onsite parking is proposed for approximately 168 cars. Ten of these spaces are allocated to the ' gas station/mini mart, and the remaining 158 spaces are proposed for the car rental/sales use. The proposed number of parking(spaces exceeds City of Renton minimum requirements for the proposed uses, which total 7 spaces for the-mini mart and 41 spaces for the car rental/sales use. Based on the applicant's long-standing experience in the car sales business, and the proportionately small size of the site for a car rental/sales operation, the larger number of spaces is needed. In the event that the Enterprise future expansion area is constructed at some future time, onsite parking for the car 4 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 ' I I rental/ es use will be reduced to approximately 146 spaces — still well above minimum Code require ents, and satisfactory for the proposed uses. The additional parking to be provided does not compro 'se any other known Code requirements or site amenities(e.g., landscaping). I No onsite vehicle maintenance is contemplated by either Chevron or Enterprise Rent-a-Car. Vehicle ashing is proposed associated with the car rental/sales use only, and will occur in an enclosed garage-' e room at the rear of the structure, equipped with a drainage collection system thai will discharg to the sanitary sewer. j The proposal includes installing two 20,000-gallon UL-rated underground fuel storage tanks associat with the gas station use. These will be constructed, installed and operated in accor ance with Was' Depart s ment of Ecology standards and other applicable regulations. One 20 000- gallon tank will be used for regular unleaded gasoline. The other 20,000-gallon tank will be segre ated into two compartments approximately 14,000-gallon-capacity for supreme unleaded gasolin and 6,000-gallon-capacity for diesel fuel. The tanks will be double-walled fiberglass construction. The outer w I will provide redundancy to the inner wall, in the event of a spill or leak. A leak det ction monito ' g system will be installed and wired for notification inside the mini mart building. Minimart employes will be alerted by this system to potential dangers or leaks associated with the undergrl and fuel storage tanks, and will be trained in appropriate emergency response procedures. I Four new points of driveway access to the site are proposed: two from SW Grady Way, one from Oakesdale Avenue SW, and a fourth at the northeast corner of the site. Access to/from Powell A enue SW will be provided in an,existing.20-ft wide easement through the Eagle Hardware corporate iffice parking lot. The applicant requests modification of City of Renton commercial driveway dth standards for the westernmost Grady Way driveway apron. In order to accommodate fuel t er trucks t service the gas sation, this driveway is proposed to be 40 feet wide rather than 30 fee (see Figure 1 The proposal includes landscaping the perimeter and interior of the site in a manner tha. will exceed ity of Renton requirements. The proposed Landscaping Plan indicates plantings over appro ately 25 percent 1(29,603 sf, 0.68 acre) of the site (see Figure 2). The proposal inc udes landscaping for wildlife, in accordance with the City's agreement with the U.S. Soil Consery tion Service for all development in the Green River Valley. Plants suitable for wildlife habitat are propose in an area approximately 6,590 sf in size, along the L-shaped border with a natural'area retained on adjacent commercial property. Established vegetation in the offsite depression used for stor nwater 'detention) includes cottonwood and red alder trees, Himalayan blackberries, elderberry, hawthorn and;grasses. Pierre Grady Way site landscaping will introduce plantings of western Ted cedar, redtwig dogwood, vine maple and Hogan cedar along this common boun•ary, includin: along the banks;of the 100-ft onsite open drainage channel. 5 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oak'sdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8%31/98 • • \ NE 1/4 SEC. 24 ,TWP.23 N ,ROE. 4 E ,W.A'\. p p n \ - - a ;ee_ \ s+XP1e.r. WATER Mn n 55 � \ w'wi“..1TOP �5YM60OILJ WATER 5JT� e u BLOW OP\• YE P 7F vALW_ zz f 5 )OT �- 1111 \_ ® SGkV.CABAET II PRE nvDRANT ({�f _ % GATE VALVE • J-y /-, ""� - - -- ® EIP4TRC DO%0. BLOW OFF YAW& /V J_ at.pa.. :K.'''._ • QU a G ORKa(UL GRATE CItVAT10N' rdlt t',' .ort fr 1 Al �� - eMTK SLO.N^MT Ost.WLJv7 >W -_-_ (SPOT ELCVATIOt51 i / o ]O •- OWN_ POMJt uY RD Y?Rep \ oo Iu66R POIL s T, i e �Yt 3 ` ACR-"-Tre Z.m w \ 8 WATER MEP.R pp f-�1.464.601116. Zl O63 DRA1445.CftECTiON Of SLOPE G` _ _-`.`� ::� Tp ppG s1' \ 5R9ACR \ \ / c-g-Lj �'i r,�' �/�.}F' - ��.�. i 05i�. ` 41'O i .r�i. r i r i e io R°reyuxrn.�waaR evn-.x • ______:_______:_--:---__________;-1; ��- ><.�N. pl' - Ire' nL-1 TO.� • \ . rP� M'Sa� �..VO '2a'O S �.�4:51--4.'. S Nfi • ' 1 1 y,��'\ I % r s r o • r^6'-'rtc. 0 - t a\ �' • s latoscw = Illi %�� -! 1 i\ ..\ _ 1 0..► Y 0 5t.:``.': s- ..4........ ._,. • iL►s 4 fir^, -IFF,pA y r.�-`u :�1i.:r"n-r l�.� • �y \ % v`ice r:p3l-"l�' � r :.r F;..zGv.�' 0 - - \ d5`�' `-- '`a` o x. �..,tlr,•■ ��+.�� „ram 1 G ~`:r a' \ / ces .`$" f \ �_� '% Y�_ .•a-+.r` ,1'I !` . / _� •vim / ! 6 \ /�_ I -�• i ,.7.0 • 6 /,u�'tl_C r/11V / ' .a...,.ao aua vg.»m. 6 % \ ..- --- ---- ----- -:----:--. \ a \�' '•%(o'er `., p4.1.T %\ PVEau':ba.b+'' i . SKr •.o �voi,�� �� \ / -i • _ _5.4-'ir4 r4 , )I \4, ,10,5•. -.:J:j"it s'• ` Iv L �1<rrrx¢AZT eeeTloro lL) latf,'--.-X.c.::: .,--------0-Narlo.',4. -2'5'1..l'r 10... .:',„et ___*„..35..,____________,,o_ __--- ,,,...- _ .-ST'' `' nP.. rc. I r-• .3,1'n w !e pp0� - LL.1 N Q i�t �` \`i��`n r. s-."s • - .11 /,�� RD�F "t.P( �_ SITE PLAN NOTES �U J e-0 U • pp +I ��1 t. "nplcates Do:lp'np aDtl�ne ` - P�� 'i►. 2. U9m pole 0_ \\ To y. Ar r``1 ;G'" � T; �';� P�ci ► •�. a. Tang fair,. Q �{��TIC Trash Enclosure O \\\ ``` • \ �,�yv67•,•,�.r, - -s � / - • 5. Eon.1 0:u Cas 31 c location De ' ��� ��es // TO'IXD•iCA�dlr SEC 5. Yin. as c1 Z'at cusp unless Dlnersi58 Ina'cail0. .n S sT% 6 0, 7. Enterprise St•eet s'pnape kb 20, .•5ET9ACek , .o ' a .• / 9. New contours \\ S '• � \ 9. Existing ccntpure g \fia. �� - J/- / Acres Pa,X, 8. NewCne con street stpnape \' '> " SITE PLAN INFORMATION ' ,.,a col square footage of toe site, 2.TA A 11935a 59.lt. 1. u0 Pi foof,on FROR.TP TD 13' T p-fT�t / Convenience Store/Gas Station D3:3,Mg' 9-9.0.s111303 a slat is ,P / 200(6y,6 r / 2. act lan0 Square footage. B sq•It. Total 0CnvenienCe State)Gas 5ration Dataing: 10 paz•ng SUMS ptopose9 Pealto'a O f - \ - 6C�aClt 11I ' 3. 11a0SCa•rnc sq':a•e loofa., r-0. Wt< ' ,�DtV: �M Natu.ai Landscaping fat f'rol,le: 6590 sq.l t.(S.SS of site) :::°:::::: Rental/Sales:(./pexpansion) a8-9-0 stantlarll etellfa nea ono cape ataai 277{01 33 t B 33i 01 s toTota�square footage o1 IanascSDing: iN3 sq.11.�)I of site)y PO a, ya:laina}m. t - Dartin 1••o e•pans ion) Z6E i?� A'-eaD s33i1,'_ i po cos su5lon pD'laing� sus sq-It. g� o stairs proposep Enrt•Dtise Gr Rental)Car$ale'tullai4. 5a250 sq.l1. .n pans ExST.'a6 POMJt , Enterer Isi Future Ex�ensioni 415 s It i tarot's!C•CCaieq parXinp:Is:e. rent a5-9-d'[ianaarp[1ar't Total Dui sing sour ICCIage, 11p35 a.ft.19.ji of s tel 36-R'-a'Obi D+i l'ep ltaitT m 5. •d.e,n`sBNre IFotaol+ 0-23'-B'Catlllei tojells // ; Eelst Ins lepervrous Stelaces: 0sp.lf. ea s' jZ -B0'nanpact s s , Iptar PropaSeC CarXtn Iv/e. and lafi Cali in Cap s1a113 Nes Paa me Taa15 s..ft. Amiable g' g Stalls p:oDoSto N!•Stamm: .lei ssa.l. B. gple purloin Ne•Byline, 11035 sp.lt g pe�pnt: N/s tOtOR R40GATi0•I total Impervious Surface[: 89751 fq.lt.115.7i of site) 9. Pioposea Wilding ne tool: 9'-1' RDIecT 50C1O AiprD.09 By 4 T. BuI101np selpacts repu'rep by ccae+ 20-C' MIb p 6- Para lop Rewirlment[i I1. CuttonPropOSe01puila'ng sllC[CXS: 2B'd' Zpnven ltntt Store/Gas Stat toot 5 star ls0.11.ip.lt.of out larng 12. ClOrent onrnp: m-c20)10 I1 6FICE Rc/C_t a•pntecl 17Mm By SIt305 sq.l t.naml•6.53 ITT 13. PrpDgseq 7z,e4i `u-rEDIW IrOIbINla1 m \ Enlei pr roe Gi Renta ll 4r Sales: 1 1a 11/56t0 sq•I1. I ii i Conilruct ion IYD<: r •03 Cap,n Venn tlT 4 51TE PLAN 11935a 5q.1t./50N T:F1 eNl ,�A --fit- __ - - _- - _- _ Enterprise Office recurred Maine. a.5 siLIT/1(pd sq•11. 1 Om lgmg _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Prod M. Qew -- sl r-<O'EF PRMS-n%347-a - 515250 Tq.lt./t0001•23.63 Ilea f�. Enterprise Gpansid Wai,npr'- r5ztails/tNd-sR:lt-al-puim�p i 51u80 se.lt.a14R1.20.16121) --'TOW- A1e1- ap 41 ToTai p sting rew:req:1Vt'e o lauionll SS oarxmg stalls rewl:la pate o rew:rea: Oars inp[Iat is rewiteo P. III ea4-5s / Figure 1. Site Plan 8/24/98 • - .. a • • LEGEND CRAMER \ �Y m..a,w A.4.• ,.A,.nW.[e. . eWA TREES • AS.. v COaWERCLLL WmaGVEIll1Ni,INi NDTEB • c...,cuY,333 .m.co,•.,ca•Y •_ • r[r v•PA11.0001 01 ALrntm -_•OR[.nAnOnm AWE.taw.,oT.A WI 11414,i r • .00usaw ,AA.wu•Watr. n eq nai..taaOlNosdAE Apes q 'I— •^ moo mem nova WW1.nun. a WO 1 Y30=OV1u CBi.00/•i 6ewtEl=••OE MLOw,n[EICW/0 OWE.a[ • 'vl.t+ w,V. eu:W ,w+R.Atw . >• [• • ,vpscE MI Cfia.VlM VefJS COMM.6�d10V9 I- v 3MP1181 • SCAM.wntarer•A.M. i Y WAWA.MAN Wan.rani • \�\\\\Ortduna.wain wow LgrlaV,u. m n c0.1Y WALL.3 RAMON ,adm. ..L1131WW..OW. T...1K MA WITMAISWata Willa Pll. N TA•WAT SCAM.MOM GACWO ® W.�WA UnmanA.,. O 117 Mar f Yv WCOIL.10 AY�lt.WWw WAS� LTG WWI.PUNT.oretnrAa n03 .- 3 o .w Y ..O non. . wA A.rY<.m •. 1 . Rarlaa fDWALLR.aa.�W �dAq N.d ,...mA,ARE n is 3,1 _ . . dN.,. m aAla 30ee,n.MIN ro0wwgwm[me,Oi:E.1 I 1 II O um.,°Wa.om ctwAwndar.Y O. M9 _ _ ___ _ —__ _ , AwfAw f CEP,wert[.Aulio.lO.N.LL a,.1a,a•OaEOa • ' • GROUND COVENS -' _• ,°LAWN 7 OW.MOWS GrAWO w„Ya NW FANIW.[Oe �'. c-y.m[ ....a a ,�A« A<�At,..aca.anninn [q A ....,[sa.vim.,aoE.•WW • 1' 1 Z .,:_ M »oY., .W as _� — WAWA CAM [a,.R[A•e,dat.,laT I• `�.: JI r 1 ��Ky f T\.s..,'a sortaw`.../N.,,:.IY[.+..m....•.[,aurw:rn:v�..m..[. 1 .�yya . uus•..,.. o :wor« - ..Aiy.q..�e:rr-A*•.rwruro-....ar.•...v.[.w r.... ' nwnt PI;WO WO le We.unr•wrareonna•On.Ann i .. \''*. \ _ a QrO^ , tii Q..m ••w A.+r waga.N.•a�.........e...�•.,...,•..a.,�..�. I z1\ �' 1 ''j�b•� „� !'i51'31d1 �• LII. YwY K ..� ",aw"''w:'..:>b.�........�waq.nio,:aa.�•,.e....., !' qqc', ._ 1-.�- ., w .60..O a n� _ - N _�.T... :=3.a: �O[.LO•WO.CAR OK.:A.Oa • S— �__ uiCIS y53— .x :mot*! i ° •• �;F;I .�`�""'p O..YrArrEall IOAaI.,.Io..O[«.c �l.e,.w,:W�. i3 \ \\ _��r. _ t'`• `�. a', ` en— .w In LAsO°°v ;.O9.un .D nOfAT dWw.a`•`sOw co •m`q:..,. \ . �_• t�• ` 1>>' g5_ , A V�Z , r s r='"g00..,.\\• '`1 ` . A\.d MO. R vs�i.Od:Cann W 3,0ntr-S.re • tiro � ''/ _ .. • / '� \. S ,.�'.., .._ Lei xm i�r 1 �L't \ 9\ 'I-P-PI: 7:::\ ....\.s4s, ,N,\,,-V-,.„.•1,...„,1._.''--..„-......:_,_:„-,,,,—,,;,,-."„.-,.,-...-.,:_,.,!--,,-\_\t1.1„.:?.•.,,.•1-:4.„-..../,,:._;;.,7;..,.r...!.,.1...,•'.....,;.y•"--. •...,.\., '‘‘.,,.\••,,i\0,ei1.r•.-\,c-\.n__..-_\.-•..2••\--•-\-1 C\ ,, ,,, ,►�� �:;�` P / ..- V•\--j,:i-V:,-\...I1i.'s j.i l.‘,,e'. .'._L I'=:L I.'1te ,1 �— icM'.f®It3,/1 f^ L,, , 0 I.A '/%Y`'v�iA'S� { ^ .r5i/i r 6 _ D���� .7.Y;L.; 7.i. .y 1 I,, (;C.0 i f lI��.,,, F '-- -- C-1' ijk,11.0115?k. A__..-1-..----t-t......\ „ \ (it.00** ....--'--'---'..--t---r:71774 ��s1a ,C11111 i� s'' Y,� +// w Wyre} \ ,,,....io . IJJ Ir IX • 11. • SffEPI AN ,� LANDSCAPE INFORMATION ej3 Y.aO 1. Total square footage 01 the sill: 2.74 Acres•119354 61.11. • 2. Total Landscaping repu0ed, Za of alto•2387 sq.It. '' _3 OeNI' Y • \_ - _ - -- - 3. Proposed Landscaping square lugrage: • - C re'•'m - - NatulaRan0500ping tor-elIOfila: — - -G`9b5041.-15.57-Rf-she/ Maintained Landscape area: 27110 sq.t1.111•24 01 site) Total square Isolate 01 Landscapino, 20103 sq.lt.111.x 01 Rile) • • 1of1 • Figure 2. Landscaping Plan 8/24/98 i 1 Permanent onsite stormwater management facilities will include biofiltration swales and dr age collection structures at various locations. No onsite detention is required, as detention for the site is provided in a regional facility approximately one-quarter mile downstream, controlled by the Black River pumping station (see the Stormwater Drainage Technical Report, American Engineering Corporation, July 21, 1998). The biofiltration swales will be designed to treat one-half of the 2 iyear, 24-hour storm flows, as,' required by City of Renton water quality treatment standards. Most onsite surface water flow entering the proposed collection system will be directed to the existing storm eater vault to ted immediately north of the proposed gas station/mini mart, in which subarea runoff flows west to the Renton P-1 'Channel. The permanent stormwater conveyance system is capabe of conveying the calculated surface water flow of developed conditions during a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If la;proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related o this checklist. Thel Pierre Grady Way site is located on SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue S\ and Powell Avenue SW in the City of Renton (see Figure 3). A lengthy legal description of the site is provided with the Master Application. Parcels A,B, C,D,E and F are located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North,Range 4 East,W.M.,King County,Washington. i 8 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Appljcation SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 1 ec • n I I ' i I °, li �I _I. ¢ Ir 1 'L LW. W A I N •V T p L-N a --� -- CZ '� II) .I I;( - ; _ j p a. \ it• Z 1. 1 II '• r m • '' — a13 h S• I o i I °' ' / Il'j, 9-- �1 Ii 3 Q , y — 4° I ,4 �, o JJ I 2 3 I II Ali •' I II 900 �, /I r z N • I �•Ids—=A �i-''4i ° 0 : ki . _• l ' S.P.016-aB �Ii1_-- • �. a ICI P --- / COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL O C 3 I- C E TiliE R . I a • 1 z c m. r• -• rr.i7—• ••--1 -. ..--:.1 ... - N� ' F �11 1I Q :..� CC ' !1 Ii I l ICJ . dJ311 h 5 .,ou I'-r �o,J r Si7 1., ` I �� • I� I I R boo d S WAGE `•i li. 7• A EAGLE HARDWARE $j.' r :-- TRATMENT I= X. EXTENDED STAY OF I CORPORATE OFFICES " rl J PLANT ; '1: i,i 1 AMERICA HOTEL . •I ' I '' t0 1 '1 I e\ •1 I .o trrwr , ca» �38-6� 1 1 li I {:>�.�' •-- 5¢ 1 •1 "TA t•. ` t _- .1-- I, 'i VACANT rre Itifillat ,\, PRO]EIyI SITE •- `NAY °Oh , l0 6 J�3{2, Ig y51 34 loeb nc I I % /0' R '0. i t3 R II xi: n91 II �' v�� - G ti ` i021 n23 ,. f�i �� o los1al1''ly.` S1Jj 55ISllIIl rrl oa� 'T i .L- PARK! p w' „ .- 73 3,3s 36 31•31 31 41i I CITY UNIVERSITY iP l0 6 S1jI3T? I • 'r�6y 314.]0��� `T r+i 2 H '�I�J ll2ii11 S tc•66 ; • .. ri - III 4 3 rr �l ' I ' kNg1211'II°1..si57�SSS61 I4l'I Illti� r UNDERPASS ; 2 I0 ��16 ISN:, s'15° • 4" i 1 Q 112613Zd_32 .1 r •�'yii.' r�!s� ' I � e i.!y� YY f i N.r.E.. •.,yiyrii✓r'rY � I.IMIrE. .. •7!:"."-...."'"r"'''TS r'r,=��� I .......001.1..15 '..: ct ' 1 U4-t.°^'.� !J Jai 01 1' •14t16 f 31-ouo - ,• . 1 IT _ J..1,: I1" .p' Ns 1 ,.. A ISl►c. ap •_II —Fj 1il" AS I 116Jp���� QtI fyrtuI 1o�.bYArY ,� ik 2 �1 � /��s s .aw— I a 14 IS 16 n lI 19 2a 11-7, 1 is l; 111 3 19 r 22 i)24 23 26 21•t�o 9 1520 21 22 23 74 25• • a t9 30 31. S.W` I. 16TH ST,y,13,l.r.I•,, .1;F .HI'I�I�j•I I•'-�''' -JO 1�I +t`,�',, IT'IT'It+ III}I. Eli j1 '•11 , I I l l 1i bl 11 II I I i t it^+IS r I- A-. i I: I II• I I s,_.:,.1„.l,,,,,.. .0. �• �4,1„ .,I.,.hi, h; r ,3 • - •111: I. I III it I • -/_LL I 3-1 I 1 .j'I.j Ll_lr- air ' LL,,J.J.JJ^L-�'.� N_ _17 y,ri. Q5� %5 I d3_� ���1 i°-rat I I I \ a \' _ -�m-- c -----_it-1'; -.. -1 ° Ott _ i4 I a p F_�• I _ A0. gy _ NORTH U '1Iti 'a 01 v;o21 I. 5bArz SCALE:1"-200' • • 2. j j -=y-. a---- ; ' -- ....... . a 55_ar:_. • a_ __.._ Figure 3. • b Yl ---� Location Map \i-J 71 1 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underscore one): Flat, rolling, steep slopes, mountainous, other The site is generallyflat,with a slight(1 percent) slope from east to west. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? i The steepest slopes on the property are the gabion-walled drainage channel side slopes at the,west end of the property,which;are approximately 1 ft horizontal to 1 ft vertical(1H:1 V)— 100 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmla d. 1 Approximately 18,000 cy of fill soils were placed on the Pierre Grady Way site between August 21 and September 25, 1997, under City of Renton Grading License B-970552. A considerable amount this maerial contains an elevated clay content, which is moisture-sensitive (American Engin ering Corporation,July 9, 1998). . Prior to fill placement, a site-specific Geotechnical Engineering Investigation was conduct d by American Engineering Corporation (April 1997) to evaluate the condition of soils and provide recommendations concerning subgrade preparations for foundations, utilities and areas to be paved. Site soils were classified in this report using the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS). Native surface soils are marginally plastic, silty clay to a depth of about 12 feet, covering practically the entire site. Tle silty clay is underlain by a thick layer of loose to dense, saturated silty sand, extendin to a depth of 25.5 to 27.5 feet in the area proposed for the gas station/mini mart building(southwest corner of the site). Soils above 27 feet were deposited by streams and flood waters of the abandoned Black River channel west of the site that used to drain Lake Washington. I , Soils encountered below 27 feet are believed to be glacial outwash deposits. Very dense, gr velly sand was encountered between 27 feet and the greatest depth penetrated: 51.5 feet. No bedrock was encountered in the eight test holes drilled on the site. It is expected that the bedrock layer is more than 100 fee'below ground surface(American Engineering Corporation, April 1997). d. Are there surface 1 indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe 1 Seattle is situated in a moderately active earthquake region where the Juan de Fuca plate is thrust beneath the North Ameiican plate along the toe of the continental slope(Galster and Laprade, August 1991). The Unified Building Code (1994 Edition) places the Puget Sound area within Seismic'Zone 10 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oa esdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application ' SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 III, which indicates significant seismic risk. The design level earthquake for this zone is magnitude 7.0 to 7.5 with peak ground acceleration of about 0.3g. Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated and relatively cohesionless soil deposits temporarily lose strength as a result of earthquake shaking. Primary factors controlling the occurrence of liquefaction include intensity 'and duration of strong ground motion, characteristics of subsurface soil, in-situ stress conditions, and depth to groundwater. Due to the flatness of the Pierre Grady Way site, there is no evidence of landslide or erosion hazards. The thick layer of loose to dense, saturated silty sand that occurs 12 to 27.5 feet below ground surface is potentially liquefiable under seismic load;however, pore pressure dissipation rates are favorable to the extent that liquefaction potential is slight (American Engineering Corporation, April 1997). e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is estimated that approximately 3,200 cy of gravel will be placed on the site for building pad, utility and pavement subgrade preparation. Approximately 335 cy of topsoil will be imported for landscaping. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Soils will be exposed to' increased erosion potential by wind and rain during the temporary construction phase. Site preparation is projected to occur over approximately 30 to 45 days. (Building construction will occur over approximately 120 days thereafter.) g. About what percent of;the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75 percent (89,751 sf) of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces (structures, pavement, sidealks) following site development. This estimate includes future construction of the remaining building area west of the proposed car rental/sales agency. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: Best Management Practices for erosion and sedimentation control will be implemented during site grading and construction, in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. It is likely that BMPs will include installation of silt fencing around the site perimeter, , stabilizing exposed soils and revegetating the site as soon as practicable upon completion of grading. It is proposed that filter fabric fencing remain in place and be maintained until site development activities including landscaping have been completed. Crushed rock or quarry spalls will be placed at construction entrances and exits to minimize tracking mud and dust offsite. Also see proposed air quality mitigation measures(Checklist Section B.2.c,below). i 11 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 Pre loading, scarification and recompaction are recommended in areas proposed for bearing structures,utilities installation, driveway and parking areas(American Engineering Corporation, July 9, 1998). geotechnical engineer will review final building design and foundation recommendations in relation to site conditions since 1997 fill placement to confirm suitable earthwork and foundation preparations. A geotechnical engineer will also be present onsite during foundation excavattibn to verify subsurface conditions, and confirm that competent bearing soil is exposed. i 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be dust and construction vehicle exhaust emissions to the air during the temporary construction period. There will also be vehicular exhaust emissions to the air associated with the completed development': 'gas station/mini mart and car rentals and sales. Vehicular emissions will be similar to air quality in the'general vicinity: the site is located adjacent to arterial streets and near the I- 405 and SR-167 freewaysj(see Figure 3). I b. Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? so, generally describe. The Pierre Grady Way site is located approximately one-quarter mile southeast of the etro Renton sewage treatment; plant on Oakesdale Avenue SW. When the wind direction is out f the northw Ist, it is possible that treatment plant odors would be noticeable on the site. These odor s are not expected to have a significant adverse affect on the proposed gas station, mini mart, or car rental/sales operations. c. Pr posed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Th magnitude of potential air quality impacts attributable to the project does not warrant a significant mitigation effort. Contractors will be required by contract terms to implement standard _ construction practices for dust suppression, minimizing soil trackage offsite, and cleaning mud and dust from public roads, if necessary. 12 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Apphcation SEPA Checklist: Revised a/31/98 c 3. WATER • a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Drainage flows west from the site to the City of Renton P-1 Drainage Channel, the lower reach of Springbrook Creek. Undetained surface flow from a 47-acre basin (including the 2.74-acre site) discharges to the P-1 Drainage Channel through 189 lineal feet of 66-inch CMP culvert beneath Oakesdale Avenue SW (American Engineering Corporation, July 21, 1998). Springbrook Creek drains the central eastern portion of the Springbrook, Mill and Garrison creeks (SMG)watershed, and flows into the Black River ( Iarza, June 1995). The confluence of the Black River with the Green River forms the Duwamish River,which empties into Elliott Bay and Puget Sound. Discharge' to the Black River is controlled by a pumping station constructed in 1972, approximately one-quarter mile downstream of the Pierre Grady Way site. Operation of the pumping station periodically causes some hydraulic backwater effects in the site vicinity(Taylor Associates, July 9, 1997). Detention storage volume for the drainage basin that includes the site is provided in the controlled outlet facilities where Springbrook Creek discharges to the Black River (American Engineering Corporation,July 21, 1998). Approximately 100 feet of a former open drainage channel through the site was left open adjacent to the east side of Oakesdale Avenue SW, at the request of the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife during the 1997 fill and grade action. Channel side slopes are protected with gabion walls to prevent erosion. The channel bottom and side slopes are vegetated with grasses for water quality enhancement(biofiltration), prior to discharge to the P-1 Channel. It was determined through technical review in 1997 that the former drainage channel was not a natural watercourse and does not provide fisheries habitat due to irregular flows and poor water quality (Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife,July 11, 1997). The Pierre Grady Way site was examined prior to 1997 fill placement for jurisdictional wetlands (John Cbmis Associates, September 1996). None were found. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. • The proposed project will not require any work over, in, or adjacent to the described waters. The westernmost edge of the Pierre Grady Way site is approximately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, separated from this drainage course by the Oakesdale Avenue SW public right-of-way (a S- lane section with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides, and a subsurface stormwater conveyance system). Drainage from the property passes through 100 feet of constructed bioswale before entering the culvert beneath Oakesdale[Avenue SW. 13 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 1 1 3) Es,mate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source cif fill material. No 511 or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,aind approximate quantities if known. I No urface water withdrawal or diversion will be required to serve proposed uses on the Pierre Grady ay site. 1 5) Do es the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. 1 ; Historic Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps indicate that a portion of the west side of the Pierre Grady Way site may once have been at the 100-year floodplain elevation. The P-1 Channel 100-year flood 1 elevation at the project site outfall appears, from available information, to be approximately +15 feet!, Surface evidence of high water marks and historic reports associated with recent flooding events do not indicate that the site is within a 100-year floodplain (American Engineering Corporation, July 21, 1998). 1 ' 1 , 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. , The proposed gas station, mini mart, and car rental/sales uses of the site will not result ' any intentional discharge of Waste materials to surface waters. Oil/water separators and containment facilities are proposed for fuel transfer areas and the vehicle wash area. 1 . b. Groundwater: 1 1 1 I • 1) Wi ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. Implementation of the proposal neither requires nor will result in withdrawal from or disch ge to groundwater, The groundwater level is approximately 10 feet below final grade followin the placemeI t of fill in 19971(City of Renton Grading License 970552). Ex, \ration for building pads, pavement and utility installations will be relatively shallow; however, excavation to install fuel storage tanks, liners and monitoring systems will likely encdunter groundwater. If a large, volume of groundwater is encountered during construction, the project engineer recommends that it be pumped, filtered and discharged to the gabion-walled drainage channel at the west end of the site(American Engineering Corporation,May 15, 1998). I ; 1 1 14 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Appl cation 1 SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/1131/98 1 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be s�Ierved (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. There will be no waste material discharged to the ground from septic tanks or other sources. c. Water Runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Permanent stormwater management facilities will include biofiltration swales and drainage collection structures at various locations. Biofiltration swales will be designed to treat one-half of the 2-year, 24-hour storm flows, as required by City of Renton water quality treatment standards. Most onsite surface water flow entering the proposed collection system will be directed to the existing stormwater vault located immediately north of the proposed gas station/mini mart, constructed during the 1997 grade and fill action (City of Renton Grading License 970552). The northerly 48-inch diameter culvert conveys the entire offsite flow through the property with adequate flood storage capacity. Downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity and appear to function sufficiently to convey developed-condition runoff from the Pierre Grady Way site without onsite detention(American Engineering Corporation, Julyl 21, 1998). The storm drainage system tributary to and downstream of the site is described above in Checklist Section B.3.a.1). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. There will be no intentional occurrence of waste materials reaching ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented for erosion/sedimentation control are described in Checklist Section B.1.h, above. Measures to control stormwater runoff in the completed development will include final grading to create positive surface gradients to direct surface water away from foundations and slabs toward suitable- discharge facilities; connecting roof downspouts to suitable discharge facilities; installing perimeter footing drains; and placing slab moisture barriers on concrete foundation slabs prior to vertical construction. The owner intends to pro de surface water quality treatment for runoff from paved areas subject to vehicular traffic in the completed development. Catch basins will direct stormwater flows to grass- lined biofiltration swales to be created near the outer edges of the property. In general, the biofiltration swales will direct surface flow to the existing stormwater vault near the northwest property corner. 15 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 I I , All surface flow from I he gas station pump islands, underground fuel tank filling areas and v hide wash room will be collected in a cement concrete trench, pass through an oil/water separator, then discharge to the sanitary'sewer. An in-line emergency shut-off valve will be placed at the outside of the oil/wate' separator vaults. ,Both the gas station pump islands and vehicle wash area will be cover11ed to minimize the collection of tainfall in this system(American Engineering Corporation,July 21, 1998). i I � Uner ound fuel stora a tanks will be constructed to applicable standards for spill prevention and gr g PP control. An electronic monitoring system will alert mini mart employees to potential dangers or leaks associated with the underground fuel storage tanks. Employees will be trained in appropriate emerge cy response prof edures. Appendix C to the site-specific Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report (American Engineering Corporation, July 21, 1998) describes proposed Operation and Maintenance BMPs for access roads and easements, closed detention systems, control structures and/or flow restrictors, catch basins, and conveyance systems (pipes and ditches). With the exception of underground conveyance facilities to be owned and maintained by the City of Renton, all onsite drainage facilities will be privatel owned and maintained by the owner or site tenant. 4. P TS iN a. Check or underscore types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen, other evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs _ X grass ! _ pasture crop or grain — wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil,other _ other types of vegetation 1 They only existing vegetation on the site is ryegrass sprouted from straw mulched into place following 1"997 fill placement. b. What kind and amount of_vegetation will be removed or altered? • Spai se existing ryegrass will be removed and/or buried during site preparation for construction. Approximately 25 percent l(0.68 acre) of the site will be landscaped in accordance with City of Renton requirements(see Figure 2). 16 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8%31/98 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species were identified on or near the site prior to 1997 fill placement. The site was specifically investigated for endangered,threatened or sensitive wetland plants (John Comis Associates, September 1996), and none were found. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: The proposal includes landscaping the perimeter and interior of the site in a manner that will exceed City of Renton development standards. Plantings over approximately 25% of the site (29,603 s) are proposed (see Figure 2). The northwest quadrant of the property (approximately 6,590 sf including the banks of the 100-ft onsite open drainage channel) will be landscaped with plants recognized for their wildlife Habitat value: western red cedar, redtwig dogwood, vine maple and Hogan cedar. This amount(approximately 5.5 percent of total site area) exceeds the U.S. Soil Conservation Service/City of Renton agreement for development within the Green River Valley shall include at least 2 percent of total site area landscaped with plants suitable for wildlife. The L-shaped property boundary is contiguous with a natural area retained for storm drainage detention on adjacent property (see Figure 2). Retained vegetation in the natural area on adjacent property includes cottonwood and red alder trees,Himalayan blackberry, elderberry, hawthorn and grasses. The proposed landscaping plan indicates use of the following plant material: TREES Sunset maple Acer rubrum"Red Sunset" Chanticlear pear Pyrus c. "Chanticlear" Hogan cedar Thuja plicata"Fastigata" Dawki beech Fagus sylvatica"Dawykii" Vme maple j Acer circinatum Western red cedar Thuja plicata SHRUBS Ottoluyken laurel Prunus 1. "Ottoluyken" Burning bush Euonymus alata Japanese barberry . Berberis thunbergii"Crimson Pygmy" Ilex crenata Ilex crenata Redtwig dogwood Cornus stolonifera Portugese laurel - Prunus lusitanica GROUND COVERS Viburnum davidii Viburnum davidii English ivy Hedra helix Medium pink heather Erica c. "Medium Pink" Kinnikinnick Arctostaphylos uva ursi 17 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 I 5. S a. Un erscore any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk,Heron,eagle,songbirds, other: crow,starling,robin,sparrow Mammals: deer,'bear,elk,beaver,other: ish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: stickleback,sunfish,dace,lamprey 1 Birds s common in urban environments, such as starling, crow, robin and sparrow, likely inhabited and/or"raged on the site;prior to clearing, filling and grading. The site was not specifically ex ed for the presence of birds or animals. The site has little value to birds or animals in its present condition, vegetated only with sparse ryegrass used to stabilize soils following fill placement. A 993 summer population survey of fish in the Springbrook, Mill and Garrison creeks (SMG) watershed reported the presence of coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch), cutthroat trout(O. c4rrrrki), rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri), three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus), speckled dace (Rhinicthys osculus), lampreys (Lampetra spp.)1 and sculpins (Coitus spp.). Fish distribution by species varied dramatically between the stream reaches within he low-gradient valley floor and reaches in the high-gradient, foothills area. Threespine stickleback were the most abundant fish in the low-gradient valley floor (Harza, June 1995), Which characterizes the lower reach of Springbrook Creek west of the Pierre Grady Way site. Since the confluence of Springbrook Creek with the Black River is equipped with controlled outlet structure, fish passage is dependent on aifish ladder at the Black River Pumping Station. 1 Th potential for fish to enter the Pierre Grady Way site through the 189 l.f. of culvert b neath Oakesdale Avenue SW during periods of high stormwater runoff was investigated prior to issuance of the 1997 Grade and Fill permit. The Washington Department of Fish&Wildlife concluded that the" . . . constructed stormwater ditch [on the Pierre Grady Way site] would not provide habitat a to iffegulT1 flows and poor, water quality. Therefore, Hydraulic Project Approval is not re iced' (WDFW,July 11, 1997). b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or ei dangered animals species are known to utilize the Pierre Grady Way pr perty or urban site vicinity. 1 c. Is t ' site part of a migration route? If so,explain. The Puget Sound area is part of the Pacific Flyway. Birds that inhabit the area vary seasonal y due to migrations. There are no apparent unique or attractive attributes of the 2.74-acre site that would constitute a particular attraction -to migratory birds, particularly since vegetation removal and fill placement. I 18 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: Landscaping to be provided with site development, particularly that portion committed to landscaping for wildlife,will provide food sources and cover, predominantly for birds. Landscaping for wildlife habitat has been aggregated in the northwest quadrant of the site, contiguous with a natural area retained for storm drainage detention on adjacent property (see Figure 2). Landscaping to be installed with the site development proposal is described above in Checklist Section B.4.d, above. At the request of the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (July 11, 1997), the owner retained 100 feet of the open channel at the west end of the former drainage ditch through the site as a constructed bioswale to filter stormwater runoff(i.e., enhance water quality) prior to discharge to the Renton P-1 Channel. Additional bioswales will be constructed to receive and treat runoff from the developed site. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Fossil fuels will be consumed by construction vehicles during the temporary site preparation period. The energy requirements of the completed project will include natural gas to heat buildings, and electricity for lights and equipment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The Pierre Grady Way site development proposal will not affect potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to(reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation features to be included in site development will include compliance with the insulation and energy reductioi measures of applicable Building and Energy Codes, at a minimum. ` r 19 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 1 7. E ONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There is a small risk of accidental spill and exposure to petroleum-derived fuels and lubricants associated with the temporary operation of construction equipment on the site, and with the proposed operation of a gas station in the completed development. There is risk of explosion associated with flammable, combustible fuels. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. There is no anticipated need for special emergency services associated with construction or operation of the proposed gas station, mini mart, and car rental/sales uses on the site. The gas station tenant has an Emergency Response Plan and Employee Training Program to prepare operators for means to properly handle the unlikely event of a leak, fire or explosion. Assistance would likely be sought from the Renton Fire Department in the event of an emergency. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: During the temporary site development period, contract language could specify that construction equipment, when not in use, be parked in a prescribed area of the site as far away from drainage facilities as possible, and that fuel stored onsite (if any) be kept in a leakproof area (e.g., behind a designated berm or other suitable containment area)to intercept spills. Proposed underground fuel storage tanks and piping systems will be installed and operated in accordance with applicable State and local regulations. Protective measures include double-walled tank co struction, .and jan electronic leak detection monitoring system. The applicant will submit separate plans and permits to the City of Renton for these facilities, in accordance with the requirements of the Fire Marshal. Thei gas station tenant has a Ha7ardous Material Management Plan, Underground Storage(Tank Monitoring Plan, Leak Response Plan, Emergency Response Procedures, and an Employee Training Plan in. place, to be implemented with site development. These plans and a list of flammable, ' combustible liquids to be used and stored on the site (gasoline, diesel fuel, and carbon dioxide) have been submitted to the City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau with the Site Plan Approval application. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operationother)? " The noise environment in the Pierre Grady Way site vicinity is dominated by vehicular traffic. The site is surrounded on tw,o sides by arterials, and is less than one-quarter mile north of I-405 (see Figure 20 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 3). The site is also less than 2 miles from the Renton Airport, with the result that aircraft are frequently audible. None of these noise sources will adversely affect operation of the proposed gas station/mini mart or car rental/sales businesses on the site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be a temporary increase in noise levels on the site associated with the construction of utilities, foundations and buildings; site paving and landscaping. These actions are projected to occur over a period of approximately 5 months. Construction activities will not exceed the hours between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM, in accordance with City of Renton and Washington State Noise Rules (WAC 173-60). 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Noise impacts associated with site development are not projected to be significantly adverse in the setting in which the site is located. Therefore, no noise mitigation other than limiting the hours of construction activity is proposed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use'of the site and adjacent properties? The site is presently vacant except for, the presence of electrical transmission lines and utility corridors. High voltage power lines pass through the property in an east-west direction, approximately bisecting Parcels B and D. Jumper lines that convey power for local usage extend north and south from the high voltage lines ;across the west end of Parcel B. Existing easements for electrical transmission lines affect Parcels A through F. A City of Renton drainage easement crosses the northern portion of Parcel B, and essentially consumes Parcel C. A 20-ft wide Metro sewer easement forms the northern boundary of Parcel A(see Figure 1). At the time of this application, the owner was negotiating a contract with Puget Sound Energy Services to'place some powerlines underground, and relocate others. The proposal being negotiated ' will result in burying the east-west powerlines from the east end of the open drainage channel to Powell Avenue SW, and relocating the north-south powerlines offsite to the west. The Pierre Grady Way Site title and legal description will be modified when the north-south powerline easement is relocated. 1 Adjacent property land uses include City of Renton arterial streets(SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW) south and west of the site; three-story office buildings to the north and northeast; and an extended-stay hotel to the northwest. Property west of Oakesdale Avenue SW on the north side of SW Grady Way is a small tract of public open space south of the Metro Renton sewage treatment plant. 21 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. Historical aerial photographs (1935 to 1995) were reviewed in conjunction with the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment of the site (Environmental Hazards Control, September 1996). Throughout this 59-year photographic record, the site appears similar to 1997 (pre-fill) conditions: undeveloped and covered with thick vegetation (blackberries and other invasive species). The open drainage channel and high voltage transmission lines were present during this period. A single railroad track cr Issed the northein,parcel, originally developed prior to the 1930s and removed during the late 1970san d early 1980s.I Therefore, during the known history of this site, it has not been used for agriculture c. Des ribe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site, per se. There are high voltage electrical transmission and distribution lines, with their associated towers, plinths and guy wires, as previously described. Historical aerial photographs for the period 1935 to 1995 reveal that there has never been a major structure on this site(Environmental Hazards Control, September 1996). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Since there are no "structures" on the site, none will be demolished. The site plan was devel ped in a manner that avoids electrical distribution system easements. However, a proposal is cu ently being negotiated between;the owner and Puget Sound Energy Services to place a portion or the east/west power lines underground, and relocate north/south power lines offsite. (See description in Section B.8.a, above.) i e. Wh t is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned Commercial Office(CO). 1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designation of the site is Employment Area— Valley(EAV). ! ' g. If applicable;what,is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 1 The westernmost edge of the Pierre Grady Way site is approximately 200 feet east of the Renton P-1 main channel, and separated from this drainage course by the Oakesdale Avenue SW public right- . of-way(a 5-lane section with curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides). ' h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 1 The site is not within a City of Renton environmentally sensitive area. 22 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 • • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There will be no resident population on the site. Projected employment associated with the proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales operations is 13 to 15 persons: 3 to 5 associated with the gas station/mini mart! and 10 associated with the car rental/sales operation. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The project will displace no residents or workers. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: No mitigation measures are proposed for displacement impacts, since there will be none. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: Preliminary analysis of the proposal by the Office of Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning (April 14, 1998) indicates that the proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales uses are generally consistent with the policy direction for development in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Employment Area—Valley (EAV) designation. The EAV designation provides for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. The rezone and development proposal was found to be consistent with the following specific Comprehensive Plan policies: Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, o, ice, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasonable buffering betwee)i the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deliveries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. The Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Office memorandum (April 14, 1998) notes no inconsistencies between the proposal and the Comprehensive Plan. A detailed analysis of the relationship of the proposal to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Code is provided in the Justification for Rezone text that accompanies this Rezone request and Site Plan Approval application. 23 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 •i The proposed gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales agency will be compatible in character (scale, appearance) and!supportive in terms of services offered to existing land uses in the area. The gas station will be a complementary use to the onsite rental car agency. Both uses are likely to serve the adjacent Extended Stay of America hotel, and the office and light industrial parks to the north and northea.t. Southward !extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW is currently under construction, o be connected as a through;route to SW 29th Street during 1999. Oakesdale Avenue SW is expected to receive considerable use as an alternative to the I-405/SR-167 interchange. The gas station and mini mart at he intersection kSW Grady Way with Oakesdale Avenue SW will be conveniently acc ssible to motorists using this route. 9. HOUSING 1 i ' a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. I No ousing units will be provided on the site. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income)housing. I No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: No 'tigation measures are proposed for housing impacts, since there will be none. 10. AESTh ETICS I i a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the princip exterior building material(s)proposed? Th tallest strictures to be constructed on the site will be the pion signs of the gas statio�i/mini mart (3 feet), and the 'car rental/sales agency (40 feet). The maximum height of signs in a zone for which there is no height limit (e.g., the Medium Industrial zone) is 40 feet (City of Renton Building - Regulations, Section 40-12-12.C.2). Light standards to be installed will also be 40 feet tall. The proposed height of the Igas station canopy is 19 ft 6 inches. The top of the ridge of the Enterprise ,, single-sory structure will be 19 ft 1-inch above ground surface. The height of the flat-roofed Single- story Chevron mini mart will be 15 ft 6-inches. (See Elevation drawings submitted with the Site Plan Approval application.) j The exterior appearance of structures will be standard for Chevron and Enterprise Rent-la-Car facilities. The mini mart will be a wood frame structure with an exterior stucco finish. The flat roof will be constructed of built-up layers of asphaltic felt paper. The fuel island canopy will be constructed 24 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 I I of metal. Facia systems on the mini mart and fuel island will be an aluminum calpolic material (ACM). Chevron colors are red, white blue and shades of gray. The Enterprise building will be constructed of textured and smooth concrete masonry units(CMU),with a metal roof. Enterprise colors are gray and green. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No significant views or traffic sight distances will be obstructed by proposed signs or buildings. The signs will be visible from I-405, SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Views of the site from the Extended Stay of America hotel adjacent to the northwest corner of the property are screened by large trees and dense shnl bs retained in a natural area associated with their drainage detention facility. Hotel units are oriented east-west, with no significant windows on the south side of the building. Views southward cross the site from the Eagle Hardware corporate office (a three-story building near the northeast corner of the property)will be altered by construction of the car rental/sales agency, associated parking and landscaping, but views will not be obstructed. The owner is currently negotiating with Puget Sound Energy Services to place a portion of east/west powerlines underground, and to relocate north/south powerlines offsite. These actions, if implemented, will constitute a significant improvement to views of and across the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: Site landscaping will soften and eventually partially screen proposed structures and parking areas. The site will have a more formal, manicured appearance within its urban setting than it does in its present undeveloped condition. This affect is likely to be considered preferable by most observers. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light standards and fixtures similar in height and character to those in the auto mall area east of the site along SW Grady Way are proposed for the Pierre Grady Way Site at Oakesdale Avenue SW. High illpmination:fixtures will be mounted on 40-ft tall poles, directed onsite, and photo-activated. Lights will-be on during non-daylight hours. Proposed structures will also be equipped with exterior ' security lighting,to be illuminated at night. • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Beams of light from lighting fixtures to be installed on the site will be directed to illuminate parking areas, pedestrian areas, and structures while minimizing offsite illumination. Views of and across the site will be altered from the existing condition(vacant), but will not result in any known safety hazards or view interference. 25 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 c. What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing offsite sources of light and glare include street lights, passing vehicles during non-daylight hours, and general light levels associated with the close proximity of the site to South Center and downtown Renton. None of these sources is projected to adversely affect the proposed gas station/mini mart or automobile rental/sales businesses. d. Proposed measure's to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Directional fixtures will be used to focus lighting onsite. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is a small passive open space area south of the Metro Renton treatment plant, west of Oakesdale Avenue SW—opposite the site. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan (August 12, 1996) indicates a system of existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities surrounding the site, on SW 7th Street; Powell Avenue SW/SW 16th Street;Monster Road; Oakesdale Avenue SW; and the proposed Springbrook Wetlands Trail. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Proposed site development will not displace any existing or planned recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: No measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts to recreation, as no impacts to designated or informal recreational:opportunities are anticipated. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser lation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. There are no known places or objects on the site or in the site vicinity that are listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers. 26 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There are no known landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance on or near the site. See the discussion of the review of historical photographs of the site (1935 to 1995)in Checklist Section B.8.b and c, above. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts to historic or cultural resources, as no impacts to resources of this nature are anticipated. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The Pierre Grady Way site is bordered on three sides by public streets: Powell Avenue SW on the east, SW Grady Way on the south, and Oakesdale Avenue SW on the west (see Figure 1). SW Grady Way is a City of Renton major arterial, and a designated truck route. SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Avenue SW are each four lanes wide with left-turn pockets in the site vicinity. The intersection of Oakesdale Avenue SW with SW Grady Way is signalized. A construction project is underway at the time of this writing to extend Oakesdale Avenue SW southward between SW 16th and SW 27th Streets, west of SR 167. Construction completion is scheduled for November 1998. The final link(SW 27th and SW 29th Streets) to complete a through corridor is scheduled for construction in Spring 1999. The road section will be five lanes wide with curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting from SW 17th Street, past the Pierre Grady Way site, southward to the Boeing main driveway (approximately SW 19th Street). The newly constructed roadway will be three lanes wide with the same amenities southward to SW 29th Street. Oakesdale Avenue SW is expected to receive considerable use as an alternative to the I-405/SR-167 interchange. The site has excellent access via SW Grady Way to I-405 and SR 167. Access to the existing • street system,is proposed from four driveways: two to be constructed along the south boundary of the site for access to/from SW Grady Way, one to be constructed along the west boundary for access to/from Oakesdale Avenue SW,and one to be constructed in an existing access easement through the Eagle Hardware corporate oilce parking lot to Powell Avenue SW(see Figure 1). The western-most of the two driveways on SW Grady Way is proposed to be 40 feet wide— 10 feet wider than standard commercial driveways—to accommodate the turning radius required for fuel tanker trucks. 27 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 1 _ ' 1 b. Is site currently seined by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance t the nearest ransit stop? i Sev ral Metro Transit routes operate in the project vicinity via SW Grady Way. The route n arest the site is Route 153, opierating between Kent and Renton via E. Valley Road, Lind Avenue SW SW 16th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW to S. Grady Way. Route 153 provides service from Enu claw through Auburn,Kent,Renton, Southcenter and Tukwila to downtown Seattle. The South Renton Transit Center is located at the intersection of S. Grady Way and Shattuck Avenue S, approximately one mile east of the Pierre Grady Way site. Connections to numerous ther routes 608, 163, 280 an4 340) serving residential areas, employment centers, and city center are available at this facility, and at the Downtown Renton Transit Center on Burnett Avenue S. betwe n S. 2nd and . 3rd Streets(approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the site). c. Ho� many parkingi spaces would the completed project have? How many woul the project liminate? No parking spaces will be eliminated from the site, as there are no existing parking spaces o the undeveldped site. i The proposed site plan includes 168 parking spaces: 10 for the gas station/mini mart, an the remainder (158 spaces) for the car rental/sales operation. Up to 23 parking spaces in th car rental/sales area may be `double-loaded"; i.e., cars would be parked by an attendant two-deep in hese parking paces, which would provide a small amount of temporary onsite storage. The proposed number bf parking spaces exceeds City of Renton minimum requirements for the proposed uses, hich total 74aces for the mini mart and 41 spaces for the car rental/sales use. In the event that the Enterprisefuture expansion area is constructed at some future time, onsite parking for th car rental/sales use will be reduced to approximately spaces s aces — still well above minimum code requirements. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). I No new roads or streets, nor improvements to existing roads and streets, are required to impleme t the proposal." Four new points of driveway access are proposed, as described above. ee of these will'consist of constructing driveway aprons onto adjacent arterials (SW Grady Wa and Oakesd a Avenue SW). ; The northeast access is expected to receive secondary use, and be contra ed in an existing 20-ft wide, serpentine access easement through the Eagle Har are corporate office parking lot. The existing parking lot was configured to accommodate this oute without alteration (see I igure 1). The driveway ramp between the offsite parking lot and the ierre Grady Way site will be approximately 8 percent grade. 28 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oak sdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. The project will not use or occur in the vicinity of water, rail or air transportation in a manner that will result in significant interaction between project traffic and these modes of travel. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. A detailed trip generation estimate has been prepared for the project by a professional transportation planner (Nfichael R. Birdsall and Associates, May 29, 1998). A copy of the trip generation analysis was submitted with the Rezone/Site Plan Approval application. Approximately 172 trip-equivalents are projected to occur with construction of the gas station/mini mart and 5,250 sf car rental/sales agency. The term"trip-equivalents" refers to the net result after necessary reductions from total trip generation, due to"pass-by"trips and short trip lengths associated with land uses that provide customer services. Gas stations, convenience stores, and other service-oriented businesses draw most of their customers from existing traffic just "passing by" the site, or attract them from a very short radius(about one mile)around the site. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Utility work within public street rights-of-way adjacent to the site will also be limited to the hours between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM, unless authorized in writing by the Renton Public Works Department to exceed these hours. This restriction is proposed to avoid peak hour traffic conditions. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. The proposal to construct buildings and a gas station on the site has the potential to increase the need for City of Renton fire protection/emergency response services. The parked cars and office building on the site associated with the car rental/used car sales agency has the potential to increase the need for police response/protection services. b. Proposed measures to reduce orcontrol direct impacts on public services, if any. The gas station tenant has a Hazardous Material Management Plan, Underground Storage Tank Monitoring Plan, Leak Response Plan, Emergency Response Procedures, and an Employee Training Plan in place, to be implemented with site development. These plans have been submitted to the City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau with the Site Plan Approval application. 29 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 One advantage of shared use of the site by the gas station/mini mart and car rental/sales a 'envy will be 1 measure of security for the parked cars and office building, due to 24-hr activity asso liated with the gas station. 1 1 I 16. UI'1LIl ES I I a. Underscore utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, r fuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other: storm drainage. 1 I The underscored utilities are available to the Pierre Grady Way site from the following provid rs: i 1 Puget Sound Energy Services Electricity and natural gas City of Renton I . Water CO of Renton Sanitary sewer City of Renton 1 Storm drainage U.S West Communications Telephone • RaiTer Waste Management Commercial solid waste collection service b. Des,ribe the utilities:that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Pug t Sound Energy (PSE) Services will provide electrical power and natural gas to the pr jest. It is anticipated that all onsite electrical service connections will be installed underground to 'both building and the fuel pump islands. Trench and structure excavations to install electrical service will likely nct exceed 4 feet in depth. The nearest natural gas main presently terminates about 50 feet northeast of the site in the!Powell Avenue SW right-of-way. The owner will request extension df the gas main to the property boundary, and extend onsite connections in utility trenches. Wa er system conn Ictions are proposed from the 12-inch diameter water main in SW Grady Way, parallel o and approximately 10 feet south of the existing cement concrete curb along the north side of the arte 'al. Service connections are likely to include: an 8-inch tap (one trench) for one ne* fire hydrant o be located in the planter island along the east side of the most easterly driveway conn ction to SW ' ady Way; and three 1-inch service taps (one trench) for two potable water services an one landscape irrigation service. Two service meters and one landscape meter(with backflow preve tion) are likely to be set above-grade between the service meter for the gas station and the mini mart. Connections to the 12-inch water main will be performed by the City and coordinated by the owlner's contractor. Asphalt pavement, cement concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk may be sawcut and patched in the SW Grady Way right-of-way, per City of Renton standards. Excavation and trenching to iistall system components ' likely not exceed 5 feet in depth. Storz adapters (or comparable) ll be installed on all primary o secondary-service fire hydrants. 30 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oa sdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 . . The point of connection to the City of Renton sanitary sewer system is north of the site, and north of an existing large-diameter (108-inch) King County Department of Natural Resources/Metro ewer trunklin The invert elevation at City of Renton sanitary sewer manhole (SSMH) 4324017 is sufficien to serve the Pierre Grady Way site with gravity flow. The site connection will require coordin tion with King County Department of Natural Resources/Metro to cross over the 1 ge- diamete9 trunkline. There appears to be sufficient clearance without pipe conflict. Trenc 1 and structur excavations to laccomplish the sanitary sewer connection could reach a depth of 10 feet. No ffsite construction is required for connections to the existing storm drainage system. T ench and strubture excavation for storm drainage conveyance systems is expected to reach a m .1 um depth o 5 feet. Onsite grass-lined swales (bioswales) will treat runoff from most of the paved eas subject to vehicular traffic: Water quality treatment is not required for rooftop runoff, therefor , this flow wi outfall directly to Ithe large-diameter underground system. The owner or tenants will engage the services of the local area commercial solid waste collection contract•r at the time of building occupancy. Typical refuse collection area enclosures are sho 1 on the Site 'lan(Figure 1). , C. SI NATURE I,the undersigned state that to the best of my knowledge,the above information is tru• and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- sigi ificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any illful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature: ���� '7W/ ,tia-- Date Submitted: a/Lerytet-3 f/ l q r'!6 1 31 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oak,sdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 j 1 ct I References 1 Am-rican Engineering Corporation. July 21, 1998. Technical Information Report: Stormwater Drainag — Jamie Pierre Grady Way at Oakesdale Site. Prepared for James and Barbara ierre, Owners. Am rican Engineering Corporation. July 9, 1998. Addendum to Grading and Fill Clo e-out Report. Prepared for Dykeman Architects. Reproduced in Grading and Fill Close-out Report. Am rican Engineering Corporation. February 26, 1998. Jamie Pierre Grady Way Site: Gr ing and Fill Close-Out Report. City of Renton Grading Permit B970552. Prepared for Jamie Terre, Owner. American Engineering Corporation. April 1997. Geotechnical Engineering Investigatio' for Jamie Pierre SW Grady Way Site. Prepared for Jamie Pierre, Owner. Ci of Renton and Puget Western, Inc. May 16, 1985. Agreement and Easement for a Drainage Channel across Puget Western's land in the NE 'A Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., '' g County,Washington. City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum. April 16, 1998. Pierre ady Way Site Preapplication Review,File#98-024. City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum. April 14,1998. Pierre Grady Way Site Preapplication Review,File#98-24—Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning comments. Michael R. Birdsall and Associates. May 29, 1998. Trip Generation and Traffic Impa Fee Estimate: Jamie Pierre' Development Proposal, Grady Way @ Oakesdale Avenue, R-nton, Washington. En * onmental Hazards Control. September 1996. Environmental Assessment, Phase I and 'hase II, Parc is A, B, C, D, E and F, Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,King County,Renton,Washington. Prepared for Pierre Enterprises,Inc. Galster, Richard Wl. and William T. Laprade. August 1991. Geology of Seattle, Washin on. United States of America.1 In Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, Volume • I ; No. 3. 1 I Harza. June 1995. ;Final Report: Comprehensive Fisheries Assessment of the Mil Creek, Garrison Creek and Sprmgbrook System. Prepared for City of Kent Environmental Engineering. 1 John Comis Assocites. September 1996. Wetland Verification Report for the Puget W stern Site at SW Grady Way in Renton. Prepared for Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties, Inc., Owner's Representative 32 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oak sdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8%31/98 Taylor Associates. July 9, 1997. Memorandum re: Potential for Fish to Access the Pierre Grady Way Site Stormwater Ditch/Tributary to Springbrook Creek. Prepared for Jamie Pierre, Owner; Don Moody,Western Pacific Properties, Inc.; and Vicki Morris Consulting Services. Vicki Morris Consulting Services. April 4, 1997. Environmental Checklist: Pierre Grady Way Site at Oakesdale Avenue SW: Grade and Fill Permit Application. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. July 11, 1997. Letter prepared by Philip Schneider, Habitat Biologist, to Mark Pywell, City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works, re: Determination of Non-Significance, Pierre Fill and Grade LUS-97-046, ECF, SP, on a Tributary to Springbrook Creek. 33 Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Rezone/Site Plan Approval Application SEPA Checklist: Revised 8/31/98 1 - • "26 865 8456 P . 01 4 ,5Ap-23-96 08: 02A D ?io +moo.» *� a .1 u,•VY\. .a.. lu1.L V.11 n.L :U w r V•Vr,W r l WLl l VnI.J1. U1-JU1T _ alley 405 - 11 .� P. Easement EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS For and in consideration of exchange of easements and other good and valuable consideration in hand peid receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, First City Equities, a Washington General � partnership ("Grantor" herein), hereby grants, conveys and C warrant■ to Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a non-exclusive peirpetual easement for ingress and 'greets over, upon and across ay t e following described real property (the "Property" herein) in Cng County, Weshingtont See Exhibit "A" Attached 1. This easement in no manner obligates Grantee or its successors and assigns to participate in the expense to construct, operate or maintain any improvements on the Property: except when improvements are initiated by Grantee. 2. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of,and be binding upon their respective successors and <4� assigns. F I Dated this 20th .day of December , 19 85 �jC�e,O. -1Y- .<<, may//�,, off' 4/T GRANTOR ryVG9 'A�� �� 1� ,�, FIRST CITY EQUITIES, �O'L��/j�l a Washington Gener P t ip ��� jt9�� G Ey% r /� avid M. Schuman - General Partn -• 4� ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF RING ) On this 20th day of December , 19 85 before me. a ' Notary Public in nd for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared nevid Crhumrn to me known to be • a partner(!) of First Cif 1 Evities 1 • , a Washington General Par ner- ihip, who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be hi5 free and voluntary act end deed as partner for the uses and purposes. therein mentioned. • WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate above written. 1,asSYa„'1o:..,� • , Notary ub c n and or. e ,$take,of ;! Washi gton, residing at; izeattle.'; 71 i' • • v( r.:•.• 0:1 r .L. y• :.Z••y• .as,' ,h • y A ^�h,)�1i1H 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED c '":. .i : Y 30?103313 AO NtH:tt, n1 3pH71A9 g� Ki Co. Records Division Sit iiY oZ li OL raj 86+tir M09�_'9 RECD F 6.00 CQS�ISL +6.00 ______ 55 MST': e3A1?Ja8 "'"26-'DC-3259 101785 r"6 865 8456 P.024 .tee -23-96 08:02A r •_• . ,,q,b, .V,.u. V. w.0 M1- , • P ,Y., Y,•V.N.-..,. ,.L1... ..d.f,,L EXHIBIT A THAT PORTION OF LOTS 11 AND 12, WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 20 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT BEING 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OP THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11 A DISTANCE OF 95.11 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, SAID BEGINNING POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST FROM WHENCE TEE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH0.08'59` WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 81.47 FEET TO THE POINT OP TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 1'14'28' WEST 16.67 FEET TO THE POINT OP CURVATURE OP A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OP 52.5 FEET; • THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 69.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 77'27'30* WEST 40.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 52.5 FEET: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 41.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 32.27'30' WEST 31.28 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE AND 3.72 FEET FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 3 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 004-83 AS RECORDED UNDER ICING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8309309001 AND THE TERMINIS OF THIS DESCRIPTION. 1 • S.eP-2_3_96 O8=03A v, ,,. , ___ , ,, ... ,_..., _ --,11 8651 8456 P. 03 ll /a . . , 011?Tf-vol� ! I! • fo • • ,k, ‘kki : : 4k // ° N y' ,� 4 • r_/�/ 1 I 0 5Go Z18d1� Zt7 AaB.� 41.-k . . . ,.1 • �01 i •\. , \ i ► r4q • Z . 1// .:.,w e-_,vim) t NI ,�l? o' ` ��Z�lo es tE_„roc) , , -- (,'ii , `/All --- fr.( Aft v . ----<- - o�ot�. fad lD r WAY prr,�r� a&c� _.----'-----'-'---7"..----- 7.7:. g 1 : •� ...>>.''''.. • Ariii4ii file' 414 iii.tir .. E,ry v:Ael too'apfvortrt.AO- At* NE'/Ii .anr/d 6. 4/c/oir Al yra •It . #'// ir9 r,7onii.r Om-cia/ icfi�c i a„,.. • L Ditto. CEWTIFICATE=,. ,!A.F. No. slog3ta 9 I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA d for record this `✓ • day .of This map Correctly 1 • 5e n•4- . • , 19,P5:3, a t m. In by me or under my ww ..�; with the requirement: Imo. Q.1-survoyl,.�.P ,,Q•1.,.. •` , at Ma Act, at Ibe request c we 'of7 It ha.I• 0..,111.e: • • thi! _mod!day of — ii.JAee, z Manager Supt. of Records heel• O.• M • Traffic Study Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW clii/°'c F/0 Vi,, 41% °p e c 1998 I MICHAEL R. BIRDSALL A ASSOCIATES Transportation Pi.i:iers • May 29 1998 Ms. Vicki Morris Vicki Morris Consulting Services 7732 18th Avenue NE ' Seattle, WA 98115-4426 re: Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady Wayi,&'Oakesdale Avenue, Renton, WA Dear Ms. orris: 1 The proposled combination of a convenience store/gas station and car rental/used car sales operation, with a fu a expansion area, is subject to the City of Renton's traffic impact fee, based on daily trip generation. The attached able gives my current assumptions and calculations in support of the following r sults: Phase 1 - Car rental and used car sales portion: 110 trip-equivalents $ 8,250 Phase 1 - Gas station/;convenience market : 62 trip-equivalents $ 4,650 Phase 1 - Optional second story above Cony. Mkt: 7 trip-equivalents $ 525 Phase 2-Future expansion area(restaurant @ 5,000 sq. ft.): 134 trip-equivalents $10,050 Total, all options and phases: 440 trip-equivalents $23,475 The term"trip-equivalents'refers to the net result after necessary reductions from total trip generation based on ITIIE Trip Generation, which would be 1,812 trips for the total site. First,reductions are customary for"pass-by"trips at land uses that provide customer services. In addition, national research has confirnfied that such land,uses have very short trip lengths compared to other land uses. Residential developments and office and industrial employment sites are all associated with average trip lengths of several miles, while gas stations, convenience stores, and other service oriented businesses draw most of their customers from existing traffic just"passing by"the site, or attract them from a very short radius (about a mule) around the site. The adjustment for equivalent trip length is necessary for balance(i.e., nexus logie) between fees charged from such developments and other land uses. Note further that Phase 2 trips would be somewhat fewer if the car rental/used car sales business were to expand iti the "future" space,rather than a restaurant, which was analyzed here for purposes of a "worst case" scenario. I will be glad to review the assumptions with the City or the Client, and confirm or modify this analysis as needed thereafter. Sincerely, 2,1,0/I e OW Michael R. Birdsall, I.T.E. ' Attachment please note nen,azea code: (425) 25713 SE 164th Street • Issaquah, WA 98027 • (206)392-7062 • Fax(206)392-8764 I TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady Way & Oakesdale Avenue, Renton WA SITE ACTIVITY TRIP GENERATION NET IMPACT FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction WFImpact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount 1.a Car Rental Business @ (1/3) of 5,000 sq. ft. & 142 parking spaces a. Reserve 10 parking spaces for employees and customers - Rental fleet= (1/3) x(142-10) spaces= 44 spaces b. Car rental_cy_cle=1/3 @ 2_3 days arid 2/3 CO 7_14 days___ Average rentals/week/car= 1/3-@ 2 + 2/3 @ :5 = 1-.0- - rentals/wk/car: 1.0 - - c. Each rental transaction generates 3 round trips=6 trip ends trips/rental: 6 d. Daily trips = car-spaces x (rentals/wk) x (trips/rental) / (5 44 rental cars 1.2 52 days/wk) = e. On-site employees= 10 1 0 employees 2 20 f. Vehicle maintenance every 7,000 mi. @ 250 mi./rental 44 vehicles 0.07 4 = 28 rentals/mntc = .035 mntc/wk = .007 mntc/day x 2ways g. Miscellaneous deliveries,other visitors 1 site 20 20 Gross Total Trip Generation 96 h. Reduction for very short trip lengths 0 1/2 of site VMT 96 trips -50% -48 Item subtotal, Car Rental 96 -48 48 $75 $ 3,600 1.b Used Car Sales Business @ (2/3) of 5,000 sq. ft. & 142 parking spaces Compare to ITE Class 841, "New Car Sales" -closest available reference-but remove half for the probably lower activity level at used car sales by rental companies a. Base for trip generation = 2/3 of 5,000 sq.ft. building = 3.333 1000 s.f. c. ITE Class 841 daily trip rate per 1,000 sq. ft. = 37.5 d. Estimated daily trips= 3.33 1000 s.f. 37.5 126 e. Adjustment for probable differences in activity levels, used car 126 trips -50% -64 sales vs.new car sales Item subtotal, Used Car Sales 1 26 -64 62 $75 $ 4,650 SUBTOTAL, Car rental and sales portion of Phase 1 - 222 -112 1 1 0 $75 $ 8,250 _ BIRDSALL&ASSOCIATES \ C Traruporlalian Planners 3 29-M 98 page 1 of 2 Far(I25)3 2-776I QJ- P 9 2571J SE 16Gh Streit•lrraquaF,WA 98027•(QS)392.7a6Z TRIP GENERATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE Jamie Pierre Development Proposal Grady Way & Oakesdale Avenue, Renton WA SITE ACTIVITY TRIP GENERATION NET IMPACT FEE Activity Daily Gross Reduction Net Impact Impact Fee Net Land Use Element Base Units Rate/Unit Trips/Day Amounts (Trips) Per Trip Amount 2. Gas Station /-Convenience Market @ 1,472 sf a. ITE Land Use Class 853 (gross trip rate) 1.472 1000 sf 845.6 1244 - b. Reduction for pass-by trips 1244 trips -70% -871 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental&sales business 1244 trips -10% -125 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 248 net trips -75% -186 Item Total, Convenience Market& Gas Station 1244 -1182 62 $75 $ 4,650 2.b (Optional) Second Story Office &storage uses above Convenience Market a. ITE Land Use Class 710,General Office Building (gross trip rate) 0.736 1000 sf 11.01 8 applies to half the unit; dead storage in other half b. Reduction for pass-by trips 8 trips 0% 0 c. Reduction for internalization with car rental place 8 trips -10% -1 d. Reduction for very short trip lengths of net new trips 7 net trips 0% 0 Item total, Second Story Office above Convenience Market 8 -1 7 $75 $ 5 2 5 SUBTOTAL, Convenience Market/Gas Station portion of Phase 1 1252 -1183 69 $75 $ 5,175 TOTAL, Phase 1 1474 -1295 179 $75 $ 13,425 3. Future Addition of 5,000 sq. ft. rental space consistent with zoning Example: ITE Land Use Class 831 (Quality Restaurant) 5.000 1000 sf 89.95 450 Reduction for pass-by trips 450 trips -40% -180 Reduction for short trip lengths of net new trips 270 net trips -50% -136 134 TOTAL, Phase 2 450 -316 134 $75 $ 10,050 SRAND_TOTALS_FOR_ENTIRE_SITE: - 1924 -1611 313 $75 $ 23,475 BIEDSALL&ASSOCIATES C T�anspor7aNan Planners Fax 025)392-8762 3 29-May-98 page 2 of 2 2572)SE)6hd Surd•Issaquah,WA 98027•(425)392-7062 e iN I V I i I i Pre-Application Meeting Summary Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW -vE_opRrt— ups�`Sv II I � . - I I • .` I CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works • j MEMORANDUM • DATE: April 16, 1998 1 i TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior. Planner SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Site- Pre-Application File#98-024 We have completed a review of the pre-application for the Pierre Grady Site. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Every attempt is made to ensure the accuracy land thoroughness of these comments. However, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of • application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional . comments. Permit Process The subject proposal would require a rezone, SEPA environmental review, and Site Plan Review. The rezone would not require'a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The applicant may submit the proposal as a consolidated permit application. Renton's Regulatory_Reform Ordinance allows an applicant to file all related permit applications concurrently. Under this scenario, the City's Environmental Review Committee would conduct the environmental review and issue a SEPA threshold determination. The Hearing Examiner would conduct an open record public hearing and make a recommendation on both the Site Plan Review and rezone application to the City Council. If there was an appeal of Ithe environmental.determination, the appeal would be heard by the Hearing Examiner concurrent with the Site Plan Review public hearing. The City Council would have the final decision-making authority on the rezone and Site Plan Review application. The consolidated process would take approximately 16 to 20 weeks. Rezone The site is presently zoned Commercial Office (CO). The proposed uses: a gas station with a mini-mart, • and rental car agency are primary permitted uses in both the Medium Industrial (IM) and Commercial Arterial (CA)zones. As noted in the pre-application, a Comprehensive Plan policy directs that rezones to CA in this area require a minimum site area of 5 acres. Staff concurs that a rezone application to I VI is most appropriate for the subject site, and it would appear to satisfy the applicant's objectives for • prospective uses on the site. The code includes specific findings in Section 4-8-14.C. that the Hearing . Examiner will consider in making a recommendation to the City Council'on the rezone request. • • The subject site is within'the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation which is . intended to provide fora mixture of commercial, office, and industrial uses. The EAV provide for flexibility in changing zoning designations on a site-specific basis. Rezones between commercial, o lice and industrial zones may occur within the EAV designation without requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Please refer to the comment memo from Long Range Planning for policy direction on rezones within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) designation. Zoning. If the project site is rezoned to Medium Industrial (IM) the following development stand rds would apply: Permitted Uses: Gas stations and mini-marts, auto sales and auto rental uses are allowed as a primary permitted uses in the IM zone. Setbacks: The code requires a minimum setback of 20 feet for buildings fronting on arterials. Both SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Ave. SW are classified as principal arterials. There are no rear or side yard setbacks required. Landscaping: Lots abutting arterial streets are required to have a landscape strip with a minimum width . of 20 feet or 10% of the lot depth, whichever is less. As mentioned previously, both SW Grady Way and Oakesdale Ave. SW are classifii d as principal arterials. The Parking Ordinance requires landscaping in the interior of the parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size. The code requires landscaping equal to 5% of the area of the parking lot. This only applies to required parking areas and not to the parking for auto rentals or auto sales. A 5 foot wide perimeter landscape strip is required around auto display areas. This standard would apply to the rental car storage area. . Per an agreement with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), all development in the Green River • Valley must landscape 2% of a total site area for wildlife habitat. The code requires that this landscaped area should be aggregated on a site, and where possible should be located contiguous to wildlife habitat landscaping on adjacent properties. Building Height: There is no maximum building height listed in the IM zone. . Lot Coverage: There is no maximum building or lot coverage standard In the IM zone. • Parking: The Parking and Loading Ordinance provides the following standards to determine parking requirements for the proposal: Land Use Parking Requirement mini-mart, convenience store: 4 to 5 parking spaces/1,000 s.f. of floor area auto rental 1 parking space/5,000 s.f. of ltaofT area office 3 to 4.5 parking spaces/1,000 s.f. of floor area retail • 4 to 5 parking spaces/1,000 s.f. of floor area The applicant should provide a parking analysis on the site plan application which includes the square foot areas of proposed building uses and the corresponding parking requirement. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on the number of new average daily trips expected to be generated by the various uses proposed. The number of trips is estimated according to the ITE Manual. cc: Jana Huerter • • • • • • Pierre/Grady Way Development.DOC • • • a• CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 1, 1998 • TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Paul rt SUBJECT: PIERRE/GRADY WAY DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY APPLICATION NOTE ON i'RELIM1NARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: • The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-applica-ion submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained m this summary)may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers • (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Re'iew comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning, and other design changes made by the applicant. SANITARY SEWER The site is served by existing 15-inch sewer main located in Oakesdale Ave SW and at the northwest corner of parcel"A".in easement. New side sewer connections to the proposed buildings are required with permit cost at$100 per connection.' Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of$0.078 per sq. ft. of gross area of the side is required. WATER The site is served by existing water mains as follows: • a 12-inch on the east side of Oakesdale Ave SW • a 12-inch in SW Grady Way • a 12-inch in Powell Ave SW • a 10-inch(in City held easement)at the north side of the site. • New wat7 main, additional' fire hydrants, and DD CV assembly (building fire control system) wile be • • required to meet current fire codes/regulations for fire protection of the proposed building on the site. Any . • new water mains, fire hydrants, and DDCV vault located on private property will'be required to b p in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113 per sq. ft. of gross area of • the site is required. STORM DRAINAGE . The drainage system for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) of new impervious surace subject to vehicular use i proposed to be constructed on the site. Biofiltration can be accomplished through an appropriately designed drainage swale or by using a wet vault (underground 7ter quality/detention system). The project will require on-site drainage study to confirm capacity in the system is being met and that the proposed system will cause no problems to the existing system up stream or down stream. The site will be required to pay storm drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129 per sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. ti • April 1, 1998 Page 2 STREET IMPROVEMENT The site has existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving, and street lights in place on Oakesdale Ave SW, SW Grady Way, and Powell Ave SW. Any proposed driveways to the site will be installed per City • codes/standards and locations approved by the Traffic Engineering section. A brief traffic study will be required for the project providing average daily trip generation in/out of the site. A traffic mitigation fee of $75.00 per trip will be required. GENERAL • Construction permit fees will be required for construction of water mains, side sewer, storm drainage system, and street improvements. The cost of permits are as follows: the.first $100,000 is at 5% of the ' cost of the construction,the second from $100,000 to $200,000 is at 4% of the cost, and the third, all the • amount over$200,000, is at 3%of the cost. • • DE1 aINVENT PLANNING CITY OF rtrw\iT9N APR 1 a "M8 • CITY OF RENTON RECE I V Lac D PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM • • DATE: April 14, 1998 TO: ', Peter Rosen r . FROM: Rebecca Lind pa v • • STAFF CONTACT: Owen Dennison(425 277-2475) SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Site Preapplication(98-24)—Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Comments 1. IIntent of the land use designation The site is designated Employment Area-Valley (EAV) in the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. Neva' development should be located designed,to achieve compatibility with adjacent uses. The proposed commercial uses fall within the range of uses indicated for the designation. Zoning is currently Commercial Office(CO). Medium Industrial(IM)is proposed. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Request for rezone to CA or CO The EAV designation is 'intended to provide flexibility in rezones between employment-base. designations,where such'rezones are consistent with policy criteria in the EAV policies. Policy LU-212.11 Changes in zoning from one commercial, office or industrial zone to another should bye considered to'achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic) • base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in • the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse land use impacts may be taken into account. • . The transmission lines that cover much of the subject.property substantially restrict the range of . options for its development. Given these development limitations,the proposed land uses appear to . be morel feasible and practical uses of the site than would office uses. Therefore, a rezone to IM would be consistent with'Policy LU-212.11. • Policy LII212.14 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones to Commercial Arterial (CA) only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 27th Street or is located north ofI-405 and south of l 0th Avenue SW and the area under consideration is part of a designation totaling over 5 acres (acreage may be in separate ownerships). As noted in the submitted materials, the site does mot total five acres. Thus CA zoning would be inconsistent with the policies. 1\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMONI-H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNINGIPREAPPIEAV\Piergrdy.docb • April 13, 1998 Page 2 Policy LU-212.12 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/or compatible uses are already located in the area. Other auto-related uses exist in the vicinity. Properties adjacent on the east and west arc currently zoned IM. • • Policy LU-212.13 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones where there is an opportunity to create improved efficiencies1 of use through the joint use/sharing of on site facilities such as parking, open space and supporting services. The accommodation of the transmission lines by the proposed uses would represent a sharing of facilities, i.e. airspace. Although this was not the original intent of the policy, it appears to be a reasonable application. • Policy LU-212.16 Favorable consideration may be given to rezones to industrial uses when a mix or • wider range of uses is not yet appropriate for a site. Although the proposal is for commercial uses, the IM zoning would also allow a range of industrial uses. Given the constraints on site uses imposed by the transmission lines, a wider range of uses is not currently feasible for the site. • Proposed Uses The proposal is generally consistent with the policy direction for development in the EAV. The proposal is specifically consistent with the following applicable policies. Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. • Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasonable buffering between he uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of • • deliveries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged Incentives should be offered tot encourage shared parking. • 3. Areas of potential inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan No inconsistencies are noted. 4. Advisory Policy LU-212.20 When moire intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse impacts should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-160. Developments should provide appropriate treatment (e.g. landscaping, improved building facade) along major arterials to mitigate adverse visual impacts. • • April 1 , 1998 Page3 Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping,fencing.and berms. H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\PREAPP\EAV\OAK 7 11.DOC • I . • • I • • • • • +1 '� + CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM • DATE: April 2, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Pierre Grady Way Project, SW Grady Way at Oakesdale • Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow for the Gas Station- Mini Mart is 1750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. The preliminary fire flow for the Rental Car Building is 3750 GPM, which requires one hydrant with 1 S0 feet of the building,and three addition hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans.and permits are required for the gas tank and piping installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$1531.92 is recuired for the Gas Station - Mini Mart and the Rental Car Building fee is 85200.00 based on $.52 a square foot of building square footage. . Please feel free to'contact me if you have any questions. . I ' I i MEMORANDUM • DATE: M G 197, ill Y TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director • SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: P!F t.R-E C i)'1 SITE.- LOCATION: f CO! N OF W f' SW 12I y. k,k,7 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 2-=0C) , Thursday, f}-p L_ ((/1 -- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to P at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. Dzr Op . kivr AUG �F" N Dviv/NG 14 7998 • ri/(e.e/ 3%MVP, , ,r - VICK_ = MO RRI S Coy® Nr o4p. s CONSULTING R p ' „ *r. E1yT0 NIIVC3 ` ` '•" .'t4 SERVICES A110E. 1 a/,. ' n8 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE C, ?'9/, _�° ''/e�'„.d.V�: PROPOSAL PREPARATION- P;4,,T: 4 • _'''• 1 PERMIT ASSISTANCE 1 1 i Laureen Nicolay, Associate Planner August 14, 1998 City of lenton Development Services Division(DSD) 1055 S Grady Way 1 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW — Iezone/Site Plan Approval Application Dear Laureen: On behalf of James and Barbara Lynn Pierre, I am submitting documents required by the City of Renton for concurrent ireview of a Rezone/Site Plan Approval application for property located on the north side of SW Grady Way, between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW. The owners request a rezone from Commercial Office (CO) to Medium Industrial (IM) to permit development of a gas station with mini mart, and car rental/sales agency. Preferred tenan s are Chevron and Enterprise, respectively. Submittal documents i Iclude the following(in alphabetical order, per DSD Table 3): DESCRIPTION i COPIES SIZE REMARKS Application Fees I 1 check Rezone+one-half(Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review) Colored Display Maps 1 each 22x34-in and Assessor's Map/ 1 lx17-in Neighborhood Detail Map 1 22x34-in Site Plan I 1 22x34-in Landscaping Plan 1 22x34-in Elevations 1 each 22x34-in and Chevron Sign Detail ! 8-1/2x11-in Construction Mitigations 5 22x34-in On American Engineering Sheet 1: Description i Composite Utility Plan Drainage Control Plan I 5 each 22x34-in American Engineering Sheet 2: Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan; and Sheet 4: Storm Drainage Plan Drainagi Report j 4 8-1/2x11-in American Engineering spiral-b1und Technical Information Rpt. 1 7732 18TH AVENUE NORTHEAST • SEATTLE,WA 98115-4426 • FAX: (206) 523-4648 • PHONE: (206) 522-8057 1 1 I - , , Laureen Nicolay/Vicki,,Morris Pierre Grady Way Rezone/Site Plan Approval August 14, 1998 DESCRIPTION ' COPIES SIZE REMARKS Elevations,Architectural 12 sets 22x34-in Enterprise building, Chevron mini mart, Chevron sign and canop' Elevations, Grading 12 22x34-in On American Engineering Sheet 3: Finished Grading, Curbing and 1 1 Paving Plan Environmental Checklist ! 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document Existing Easements H 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled with Legal Description Floor Plans 5 sets 22x34-in Enterprise+Chevron Geoteclnical Reports Two American Engineering spiral- bound Technical Information Rpts: 5 8-1/2x11-in Geotechnical Investigation I 5 8-1/2x11-in Grading and Fill Close-out Report Grading Plan, Conceptual 12 22x34-in American Engineering Sheet 3 Finished Grading, Curbing and 1 ; Paving Plan Justification for Rezone; ; 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document Landscaping Plan, Conceptual 5 22x34-in Cramer Design Sheet 1 of 1 Legal Description I 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document List of Surrounding Owners 2 8-1/2x11-in Stapled form, one with origina notarized signature Mailing Labels I ' 2 sets 8-1/2x11-in 2 sets on label stock+one cop Master Application Form 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled form, one with original notarized signatures Parking,Lot Coverage and 12 22x34-in On Site Plan Landscaping Analysis Plan Reductions (PMTs) 1 each 8-1/2x11-in Assessor's Map,Neighborhood I Detail Map+Site Plan,Elevations, Floor Plans, Engineering Drawings 1 4x6-in Neighborhood Detail Map Postage I 13 @$0.32= To be paid by check or cash at j $4.16 intake appointment PreApplication Mtg Summary 5 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document Project Narrative 12 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document Screening Detail: Refuse 1 12 22x34-in On Site Plan Site Plan,Land Use Review 12 22x34-in Dykeman Architects Sheet A1.1 Title Report I 4 8-1/2x11-in Stapled document Traffic Study 3 8-1/2x11-in Michael R. Birdsall Associates, stapled document Utilities Plan 5 22x34-in American Engineering Sheet 1 1 Composite Utility Site Plan 1 Waiver of Submittal Req. 4 8-1/2x11-in Tree Cutting/Clearing Plan waived 2 Laureen Nicolay/Vicki Morris Pierre Grady Way Rezone/Site Plan Approval August 14, 1998 We look forward to receiving your confirmation that this application is complete. Please contact me if there is anything',else you need at this time. Sincere y, Vicki Morris I , • cc: James and Barbara Lynn Pierre Don Moody, Western Pacific Properties, Inc. Michael Barthol, Dykeman Architects Cheryl Girard, American Engineering Corporation 3 I Title Report Pierre Grady Way Site @ Oakesdale Avenue SW DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 14 1998 RECEIVED ; t • Extended Coverage ' PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. A.L.T.A. OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE A Order No .,: 291508 Policy No. : 1093-009591 Policy Date : September 30, 1996 Policy Amount : $450 , 000 .100 at 4 : O8 p.m. 1 . Name of Insured: JAMESIP. PIERRE, and BARBARA LYNN PIERRE, husband and wife 2 . The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is : 1 FEE SIMPLE 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at date of Policy vested in: JAMES ', P. PIERRE' and BARBARA LYNN PIERRE, husband and wife 1 4 . The land referred to in this Policy is described as follows : As on1Schedule A, pages 2 through 6, inclusive, attached. 1 1 1 r Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows : PARCEL A: That portion of Lot 12 and Tract B of Washington Technical Center, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 122 of Plats, pages 98 through 102, inclusive, in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows : That portion of th northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Commencing at the northeast corner of the south 40 feet of Section 13 ; thence north 88°15j00" west along the north line of the south 40 feet, a distance of 854 . 73 feet, more or less, to the west line of Powell Avenue Southwest, being the northwest corner of Earlington Industrial Park Number 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 88 of Plats, page 80, in King County, Washington; thence south 1°14 ' 28" west along the west line of said Earlington Industrial Park Number 2 and its prolongation thereof 1, 810 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of the 100 foot Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way (now Burlington Northern, Inc . ) ; thence southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 151 .42 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southwesterly along said right-of-way a distance of 310 feet; thence north 12°32 ' 30" west a distance of 120 feet; thence northeasterly parallel to the southerly line of said right-of-way a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to a point which bears north 12°32 ' 30" west of the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south 12°32 ' 30" east a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (BEING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARCEL B : A strip of land immediately south of and adjoining the right-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, said strip being more fully described as follows, to-wit : Beginning at the point of intersection of the south marginal line of the right-of-way of the Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway with the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which bears south 0°15 ' 30" east 556 . 1 feet from the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24; (legal description, continued) Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A . Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ]continued: thence south 0°15 ' 30" east 138 . 78 feet to a point; thence north 76'°131 east 135 feet from and parallel to the south marginal line of the right-of-way of said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway, 1, 385 . 27 feet to a point on the east line of said Section] 24; thence north 0o125 ' west 138 .78 feet to the intersection of the east line of said Section 24 with the south marginal line of the right-of-way of Said Renton branch of the Northern Pacific R ilway, which said point ; of intersection lies 198 feet south 0°25 ' a st from. the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northea t quarter of saidl Section 24 ; thence followin]gisaid south marginal line of the right-of-wa of the Renton branch of; the Northern Pacific Railway south 76°13 ' west . 1, 384 . 8 feet tol theplace of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying easterly of the westerly line of Powell Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by Quit Claim Deed recorded under Recording Number 8309300560; (BEING a portion of Lot 3 of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 004-83 recorded under Recording Number 8309309001) . PARCEL C: That portion ofi the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°55 ' 12" east along the west side, 348 .27 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; thence north 77°29 ' 12" east 438 . 59 feet to an intersection w. th the northerly margin of the Puget Sound Electric Railroad right- f-way; thence northeasterly along said northerly margin an arc distance of 274 . 10 feet to a point of tangency, the radial line of which bears south 12°30 '48" east for a distance of 741 . 82 feet to the radial center; thence north 77°29 ' 12" east along said northerly margin 672 . 76 feet to th'e easterly line of said southwest quarter; thence north 0°r45 ' 23" east along said east line 25 . 69 feet to the southlerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence south 77°29 ' 12" west along said southerly margin 1, 116 . 28 feet to a point of, curve, having a radius of 905 . 35 feet, the radial center of which bears south 12°30 '48" east; thence southwesterly along said curve and south margin an arc. distance of 261. 61 feet to an intersection with the west line of said southwest quarter; thence south 0°55 ' 12" west 38 . 52 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue, Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438 . ' (legal description, continued) Il Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A Page 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL D: A strip of land 50 feet wide, being 25 feet in width on each side of a centerline of definite location of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) Renton branch, on, over, across and through that certain 10 acre tract of land along the northerly side of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and part of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24. in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24 , the centerline being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of the definite location of the Renton branch of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) with the south line of the 10 acre tract described above which bears south 29°41 ' west 264 . 7 feet from the center of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ! in King County, Washington; thence in a northeasterly direction as follows : Curving to the left by a radius of 716 . 8 feet a distance of 274 . 3 feet to a point; thence north 33°17 ' east 345 feet to a point; thence curving to the right by a radius of 716 . 8 feet, a distance of 536 . 6 feet to a point; thence north 76°13 ' east 685 . 2 feet to a point on the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which bears south 0°15 ' east 607 . 5 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8711020438 . PARCEL E : Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0°15 ' 30" east 633 . 21 - feet from the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the norltheast quarter of said Section 24 ; thence on a course! south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway' s right-of-way a distance of 117 . 89 feet; thence on a course south 13°47 ' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course! north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 . 32 feet; thence on a course north 0°13 ' 30" west a distance of 19 . 54 feet to the point of beginning. illegal description, continued) Policy No. 109 • -009591 SCHEDULE A Page 5 � I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL F: That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quart-r and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 24 Township 23 North, Range 4. East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the north line of South 153rd Street with the east line of said northwest quarter of the southeast quarter; thence westerly along said street, 350 feet; thence northerly at right angles to said street line, 800 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way 360 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the east line of said southwest quarter of the northeast quarter; thence south 860 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying southerly of the northerly line of S .W. Grady Wayl (Black River Junction-Renton Road; ) AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 8804110193 ; AND XCEPT that portion thereof described as follows : Beginning at appoint on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of thelnortheast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, which is south 0°15 '30" east 633 . 21 feet from the northeast corner of the s uthwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24 ; thence on a course south 76°13 ' west along the south boundary line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway' s right-of-way a distance of 117 . 819 feet; thence on a course south 13°47 ' east a distance of 19 feet; thence on a course north 76°13 ' east a distance of 113 . 38 felt; thence on a course north 0°15 ' 30" west a distance of 19 . 54 feet to the Point of beginning; TOGETHER WITH a 20 foot wide easement for ingress and egress being 10 feet on each side of the following described centerline : Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 11 a distance of 95 . 11 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; said beginning point being onla, curve concave to the southeast from whence the radius point bears south 0°08 ' 59" west. a distance of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 81 .47 feet to a point of tangency; (legal description, continued) I � g P � I } Policy No. 1093-009591 SCHEDULE A Page 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: thence south 1°14 ' 28" west 16 . 67 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 69 . 84 feet to the point of tangency; thence south 77°27 ' 30" west 40 . 32 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left having a radius of 52 . 5 feet; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 41 . 23 feet to the point of tangency; thence south 32°27 '30" west 31 . 28 feet to a point on the northerly line and 3 . 72 feet from the most northerly corner of Lot 3 of Lot Line Adjustment 004-83 as recorded under King County Auditor' s File Number 8309309001 a d the terminus of this description, as disclosed by King County Recoi.ding Number 8602280930 . END OF SCHEDULE A i J I ' Owner' s Extended Coverage PACIFIIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. A.L.T.A. OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE B Policy No. : 10-3-009591 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of she following: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS :' 1 . Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes l bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government . 2 . (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 3 . Taxes or special ;assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records . 4 . Any service, intallation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal . 5 . Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or abori gin:l rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes . SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS : 1 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: • PURPOSE : Electric transmission line I AREA AFFECTED: Over, lalong and across the easterly side of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section24 RECORDED: I July 30, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 1232950 The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. (continued) Policy No. : 1093-009591 SCHEDULE B Page 2 2 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE : Lillian Rasmussen PURPOSE: Water pipeline AREA AFFECTED: A strip of land 2 feet in width over a portion of said premises and other property, the exact location of which cannot be determined RECORDED: January 11, 1944 RECORDING NUMBER: 3359489 AFFECTS : Parcels C, D, E and F 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE : Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington PURPOSE : Sewer line or lines AREA AFFECTED: A strip of land 20 feet in width measured at right angles to the sides thereof, the southerly line of said strip being also the northerly line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way of the Northern Pacific Railway Company in the south half of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington extending along said northerly line from the intersection thereof with a line parallel with and 470 feet easterly, measured at right angles, from the north-south centerline of said Section 24, to the east line of said Section 24 RECORDED: July 14 , 1961 RECORDING NUMBER: 5306156 4 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE : City of Renton PURPOSE : Drainage channel AREA AFFECTED: As constructed over a portion of Parcel F RECORDED: May 29, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8505290677 (continued) • I • • Policy No. : 10 3-009591 SCHEDULE B . Page 3 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, IN LUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a • Washington corporation PURPOSE: To construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, ,.r move, enlarge, and use one or more electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: , As constructed over a portion of Parcels A through E RECORDED: • October 30, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9510301235 6 . RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY DEED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON: RECORDED: December , 1962 RECORDING NUMBER: 5516657 AFFECTS : Parcel F 7 . .RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, AS HERETO ATTACHED: RECORDED: August 6, 1979 RECORDING NUMBER: 7908060666 8 . RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE RESTRICTIONS AS • • HERETO ATTACHED: RECORDED: March 7, 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7303070369 AFFECTS : Parcels C, D, E, F and 'other property Said instrument is a re-recording of instrument recorded undr Recording Number 7302230486 . 9 . GENERAL TAXES ON OPERATING PROPERTY OF THE TAXPAYER, INCLUDING THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY: AMOUNT: ; ; Available from the state of I Washington in Olympia • TAXPAYER: Puget Western, Inc . TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 242304-9108-03 AFFECTS : Parcel C and other property I � (continued) I ' J Policy No. : 1093-009591 SCHEDULE B Page 4 10 . GENERAL TAXES ON OPERATING PROPERTY OF THE TAXPAYER, INCLUDING THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY: • y AMOUNT: Available from the state of Washington in Olympia TAXPAYER: Puget Western, Inc . TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 242304-9107-04 AFFECTS : Parcel D and other property 11 . GENERAL TAXES ON OPERATING PROPERTY OF THE TAXPAYER, INCLUDING THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY: AMOUNT: Available from the state of Washington in Olympia . . TAXPAYER: Puget Western, Inc . TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 242304-9104-07 AFFECTS : Parcel E 12 . Our review of the Iolmvig, Wasell and Associates record of survey under Job No. 96-007-699, disclosed the following: 1 . Legal description contained on said survey does not correspond to the legal description of record. 2 . Location of the adjoining paved parking lot (Detail #1) and the location of the sidewalk (Detail #2) as delineated on said survey 3 . Said survey contains the following NOTE: This map of survey represents the deed lines and/or deed corners as intended only. The lines and/or corners of ownership may or may not be as deeded. (continued) - i I r Policy No. : 1093-009591 SCHEDULE B Page 5 13 . DEED OF TRUST TOSECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS : GRANTOR: James P. Pierre and Barbara Lynn Pierre, husband and wife TRUSTEE : Stewart Title Guaranty Company, a corporation BENEFICIARY: Puget Western, Inc . , a Washington corporation AMOUNT: $337, 500 . 00 DATEDI. September 25, 1996 RECORDED: September 30 , 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9609302337 END OF SCHEDULE B • MS/dh/6440U I I - • •.1 i • '1 • .C....t \ ‘ • ....•• , "a �' r LOT 4 Z— �;l,l 3Q3gSO .. 3.4.r•• iei \ ..? • b. S�I � •a� nr � \\f _% 0 :;,� ''a •\ , I . ti oil 7 ,io AOOlo7t i° ,; ,70 -= . \jai I, . he; S7tt5 ' C . ,, jL :;Jje >`'f1Rn , r'` z > 6. __;.�•Y ,e.C.? % w .J• _ j:7 y S 4J r 07) .a 1' o+ 7.t1 — a 1%1 De f v 1". _ ::. , 3f Zf•j7_ • O Y -�.35\ o�J, ~/. x`\, art•4 R •''\•��4• yam:+ 1'�a 3> f rl li L. \' i8/• +.• a • p.. 7. ,�,"• �c� 507,4 t �s<� 5•.+• 17, :'9•,;V / 111\ •: : • I t e °', 4 7 1 .t 0 : lf.u[•w..) .c�'� ,...' .21 20: :/ 1 .• i t.,7 • n i c r 4 t•' ° ., ,s / we '22 /t \ .re!1 :a• / E >:) o / '20.p; • f•, 7 F T yY: • 0N 4Ide. 01 01,1'0.-1 10I 1$.24 1:..1, .I 0N p 5 7,. t ,, pry J o a • . /i •:-,. 1 _ ,•.tz — 7gA, r. Jtwe 5 °:c 0 1.59 AO A' 15 011 I 1 41' a '''�:>�,fr,",Jv way96�. 7. 0 2 ' .r'• I1 : 3 ' ".}1pit i 1 , d1 �i c,e .� yj ' 7! O I 235 �' .was \` / �. �� •7s7 c a: a O 3, ,73 !I•If' 404 1 j 4 °I a a.s 33 01111111 1 !• • GAP 5'1` r: i '` ® t';1 z471 �l0•�6 r e w •J off. 19 G4. . n• II ..�.' • ` ;2(J •' .....• rs. ...qi A *"... .si\X to Iii 0 toC C. /' ,/1///'' �' •� 511111 illi 111111111r(C.11.17.11 ' ,f \ • ae52//ems ti-� 31 36 39 t50CH 5 5• 't•r•r1 •RE�ylON � t: as�°�3r�33 34:3• 2 �' ///l•s4 io.5• Jo-l) N.NO.2r" ' = ' ltjizz.s Kc 51 32 sgD ° ••t N. i �•a: :l3 ', S'R•NO 2"0 -co JCsf ,... �t.las.zs.4 c Sf� o ow• ?9' fi '•K jrlos�°H7 _ 0 2• ' :T. '" �F.s,.r5 • tom.'`` 4 1 1 :VW 6 II a 3 igi tfo'ee hxri.n ir 7 3• .°D • i 4, y2 s6• jD r = z. 1336.37• — I —•—NC7'3,l'33W • u�l CPC 2_�WW1 0� i I�� Sw`/d —II t.`/4 —a3 —4 ..-u:-M • J • STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. NORTH .N ; ",a Tradition Order No. 'D q I 6 % • of Ercellence" \✓ IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with referencelto streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of SOUTH • reliance hereon. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC,_ I - • WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING APPLICATIONS • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WAIVED IMODIFIEDA 111111115,111iWNVEINg111111110•1 • Architectural Elevations .................................. •Architectural Plans Commercial/Industrial/Multi Family Architectual Plans, Single lamily/Duplex ....... Blocking/Anchoring/Skirting Details Constructidn Mitigation DecriptionDrainage Plans ........... ••• •• ••••'•:••• :•,:•,•••••••:••••••••••-•:•••• •••,•••,••-••• • .•: :.•••• . Drainage Report Electrical Plans .1:1.111111111.11:.i Energy Code Checklist, Non-Residential Energy Cde Checklist, Residential Foundatioi Plans ::••••• •••• •• •-•''''''''''•••:-•;•••••:••••'••••••'•••••::. Geotechnical Report Grading Pan ••Grading Vsork Description• •••••••:•• ••••• ••••••••,iii: Heat Loss Calculation '• //Installer Certification • •••• ••••••:••• Irrigation Sprinkler Plans ••••••••••••••••••••••• King Coudty ••• Dept ,Approved Plans (/1 Land Use Permit Conditioris,Approved (if any) Landscapng Plans • —• • •' •••••••• ••••••:•• yi• •••••::"•••••:•:::•'-;•:••••:•:•••:•Fiii Mechanicl Plans Plumbing Plans I Receipt fOir Construction (Utility) Permit • Application Roadway Construction Plan ' • ••••• •••••••••••••••-•'•••:••::••••••••••,-"•••••••••••:•:,•% ••••:,'.... ....... ........ Side Sewer Capping Perrnit,.Finaled S • •' • • • • •• • • • •-•:•••••'•: ••••••••••••-•••••-•••'••••••••"::•••••••::::::: ••••••T•••••g:i:•'.1,'.6.;:•?••:•:•: ••:'•••:!;:iz•if-:•••,:•?•1'. ••••••• ••••••• •••••••• . 1. .• Site Plan,ISign . • •• •• • • ••••••••:••••.••••• Structurall-Calcpiatiqha. I ••-••••••••••, . ............................................................................................ , • .. •••.•:•,•:•:• ......... •• .• Structural Plans T9Pc9rP!IY:M /:?.rri°1 becombined with site ••••••:•••'••••.• •••••••• • • •••••••" ....•i••••••••••••• ,••• •••••:••••••••••:••••••:::••••••••••,;••••••••:1 • Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan, Approved These requirements may be waived by the Iuildirig Sectio . PROJECT NAME: Ao-ro fi(ms6-r(P DATE: - h:Viivision.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ng1bldwaive.xls • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOI0 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING APPLICATIONS .... .. ... U..MITTAL REQUI,REMEIVTS,;;; ;:: :;.:;;:...:..:.;;:.:::.:.<. ;.::::.>::.r:..::::..::.::::.::::.:.:. ::.::.::.::.>;::.:.;:.;::.>:.:.::;:.:: :.::;:::.:..:;:.:.:.;:.;:.:;:.;:.;::.:;• Utilities Construction Plans Utilities.P.lan, Single.Family/,Du lex _ •�� •� .. � . Water/Sewer Availability Letter . / • :;:::..:.::.:::.::.;:.:::<.::.:.::.;:.:>:.:;;:::.;:.;:.:.::.>:;.:::.: .:;::.:::..:.,.:.;.,.:.:..:.::,.:;::.:. :.:::.;.;::.:.::,;:,:::..:.:.::.:.::.:.;::: ... ervlce..Disconnect::fte uest.. Final ..:.Q::: .: � :�:>::>::>;>:::, :::»•.>;::::....:�..:::.:::::::.::::>:<:;:<.:,:;::.:::.:::•:.::•::.;..<:.:.::;:::::::::...:::.::.:,<.::.:::. •.;::::::..:::::.;.::..:.:.::: WSEC Tradeoff Form _ /!,/, - I These requirements may be waived by the Building Section. • . • • . • , • • • I II h:\division.sklevelop.ser\dev.planing1tildwaive.xls I it 1 ***x*********************, *************************w ********* II I Cit of Renton WA Receipt ** ************************************************************ Re eipt Number: R9804986 Amount: 3 , 500 . 00 08/14/98 13 :31 P yment Method: CHECK Notation: #1357 J.PIERRE Init: LMN Project # : LUA98426 Type: LUA Land Use Actions I ' Total Fees : 3 , 504 . 16 T is Payment 3 , 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 3, 500 . 00 Balance: 4 . 16 *** ************************************************************ A count Code Description Amount 0 0 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 0 0 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0014 Rezone 2 , 000 . 00 0 0 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 I I � *********************** **************************************** Cit of Renton WA Receipt *** ********* ************************************************** Receipt Number: R9804987 Amount : 4 . 16 08/14/98 13 :31 P.:yment Method: CHECK Notation: #2402 V. MORRIS Init: LMN Project # : LUA981126 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees: 3 , 504 . 16 Tlis Payment 4 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 3, 504 . 16 Balance: . 00 *** ************************************************************ A count Code Description Amount 010 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 4 . 16 I I � I I I I I r - II (4) OAKESDALE AVENUE AND SW GRAD WAY RENTON,WAS ' I GTON Geotechnical Engineering Investig tion for Jamie Pierre — SW Grady Way Site - April 4, 1997 MEN4co1\11�G • Prepared for: Mr.Jamie Pierre 11525 Lake City Way NE Seattle,WA 98125 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Jamie Pierre SW Grady Way Site Oakesdale Avenue and SW Grady Way Renton, Washington L i April 4, 1997 Prepared for: Mr.Jamie Pierre _ 11525 Lake City Way NE j Seattle,WA 98125 by: American Engineering Corporation if 4032 148th Avenue NE Redmond,WA 98052 Tel. (206) 881-7430 AEC Job#9703 1 j Table of Contents i Page Na - L Introduction 1 A. General 1 ll B.1 Project Description 1 , C. Scope of Services 2 i IL Site Description and Investigations 2 A: Surface B. Subsurface 3 C. Groundwater 3 D' Seismicity 4 III. Conclusions and Recommendations 4 A. General 4 , � B. Earthwork 6 1. Clearing and Site Preparation [ 6 2. Temporary Excavations 1 6 3. Subgrade Preparation 1 6 Ir 4. Engineered Fill Layer l 6 5. Fill Material 7 t i ! 6. Compaction 7 7. Surcharge 7 8. Trench Backfill 8 9. Drainage 8 . 10. Slab Moisture Barrier 10 11. Construction During Wet-Weather Conditions 10 12. Guide Specifications 10 �, 13. Monitoring 10 C. Foundation Support 11 1 1. Spread Footing 11 2. Piles 1 11 I 3. Slab-one-Grade 13 4. Settlement 13 5. Resistance of Lateral Loads 13 _ ' D. Pavements 14 IV. Construction Observation 14 IV. Report Preparation 14 l lj i Table of Contents FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. Vicinity Plan Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. Site Cross!-Sections Figure 4. Typical Footing Drain Detail Figure 5. Typical S1ab-on-Grade Design Detail Table 1. WSDOT Standard Specification Section 9-03.12(2) Table 2. Pile Embedment and Length APPENDICES Appendix A. Boring Logs Appendix B. Cone Penetration Tests I, Appendix C. Guide Specification for Site Earthwork p Appendix D. Guide Specification for Asphalt Paving I - I , • ii i U Geotechnical Engineering Investigation For Jamie Pierre — SW Grady Way Project Renton,Washington I I I. Introduction A. General This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the Jamie Pierre SW Grady Way site located on SW Grady Way between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell Avenue SW in Renton,Washington(See Figure 1,Vicinity Map). pie purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the foundation soils and provide recommendations concerning the geotechnical engineering aspects of site conditions. -- American Engineering and its staff have performed several geotechnical studies in this area. We az7 familiar with site conditions and alternative development concepts being considered for this property. Conditions generally require pile foundations since the foundation soils are generally loose and subject to potential liquefaction and settlement. B. Project Description The likely development scenario at the time of this writing is a three-story,5000-square foot footprint -1_u structure with a large parking area(See Figure 2). The structure is to be located on the northeast corner 9f Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW Grady Way. The parking area will be located on filled ground over the el 'sting drainage)channel and und r the electric transmission lines crossing the property. Access to the site will b from new driveways to be constructed on SW Grady Way(two)and Oakesdale Avenue SW(one). Building loads are anticipated to be about 600 psf dead load with combined active and dead loads f 1000 1 psf. The structure is proposed to be constructed with a steel frame and pile foundation. Alternatively, a 20,000 square foot building may be constructed on the north side of the property. This single-story structure would be placed on fill,and may potentially be placed on wide,spread-footings if earing loads are low. The site has not been graded since abandonment of an old railroad grade on the nortem parcel. A dense growth of vines and shrubs covers the site. Recent activities have flattened many of the vines;however,a thick _] mat of organic debris covrs the entire site. i__ 1 T i Geotechnical Engineering Investigation' AEC#9703 SW Grady Wary Site April 4, 1997 C. Scope of Services The scope of work for this geotechnical investigation included a site visit;drilling,sampling,and testing a total of eight gh (8)holes(Figure gore 2) engineering analysis for settlement and pile embedment; and preparation of this report. Data obtained and the analysis performed were for the purpose of providing design and construction criteria for site earthwork,building foundations,slab-on-grade floor,and pavements. This report has been preparled in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices,and in accordance in agreement with Jamie Pierre for the exclusive use of Mr. Pierre and his consultants for specific application to the commercial structure and parking area. In the event there are any changes in ownership,the nature,design or location of the proposed commercial structure and parking area,or if any future additions are planned,the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless 1)project changes are reviewed by American Engineering Corporation,and 2)the conclusions and -- recommendations presented in this report are modified or verified in writing. Reliance on this report by others must be at their risk unless we are consulted in the use or limitations of this information. We cannot be responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards without further consultation. We can neither vouch for the accuracy of information supplied by others nor accept consequences for unconsulted use of segregated portions of this report. -�a II. Site Description and Investigations The Pierre Grady Way site lias been subject to extensive,long-term development since the construction of an old abandoned railroad grade through the property probably as early as the turn of the century. Subsequent development has included construi tion of the electrical transmission line towers,development of SW Grady Way, excavation of the drainage channel and grading of industrial property north of the site. The property is covered by a dense mat of blackberry vines and shrubs. A few trees are present in the area planned for the three-story structure. The organics form a dense mat,locally up to 12 inches thick. , Imported fill was used to construct the railroad grade and also placed to the north. These deposits will be regraded during the proposed fill and grade operations. The fills have raised the present ground surface north of the drainage channel more than 101 feet above the bottom of the channel floor. While there is no visible evidence 2 I = - fl Geotechnical EngineeringInv stigation C#9703 SW Grady Way Site Apri14, 1997 of runoff within the site boundaries into this drainage channel,water flows through it at 0.5 to 1.0 cfs( the Technical Information Report, Stormwater Drainage,American Engineering Corporation,April 1997). {~ A. Surface The subject site is located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW Grady Way. he south site of the property is about 6 feet below the level of SW Grady Way. The drainage channel is 4 t 5 feet lower than the existing elevation of the site,and runs east-west across the length of the property. The si is about 2.74 acres in size,crudely rectangular,750 x 200,with a 120 x 300 rectangle jutting northward from the longer dimension. Surrounding land development,drainage and old fills have made site access and developmen difficult. A low—level po erline crosses under the main high voltage lines very close to the ground on th western one-third of the site. Care must be taken during site grading to avoid this potential hazard. B. Subsurface Borings drilled onsite revealed approximately 12 feet of marginally plastic,silty clay soil(Cl). T s layer extends the length of the site,east to west,and was found in all borings (see Figure 3). Underlying the s' ty clay is a thick layer of loose to dense silty sand that extends to a depth of 25.5 to 27.5 feet within the area pro, osed for the three-story building. This material is potentially liquefiable under seismic load. However,pore pressure dissipation rates are favo Fable to the extent that the potential is slight. Below 25.5 to 27.5 feet,a very d nse, gravelly sand was encountered that extends to the greatest depth penetrated: 51.5 feet. t1 The soils above 27 feet were deposited by streams and flood waters of the abandoned Black River hannel, located west of the site,that used to drain Lake Washington. Surface runoff now drains to the Green Ri er at 1 'Tukwila,and ultimately to Puget Sound. These underlying shallow soils are saturated and potentially su ject to disturbance from settlement and seismic activity. Soils encountered below 27 feet are believed to be dep sits of glacial outwash. No bedrock was encountered;the depth to bedrock is expected to be greater than 100 f t below rTh the site. C. Groundwater The water table in this area is in contact with the bottom of the drainage channel through the site. 's level will be about 10 feet below final grade following the proposed grade and fill action. Groundwater will aintain saturation of the loose,silty sand underlying the property,but is not expected to rise appreciably above the drainage channel bottom elevation of approximately 10 feet ASL. None of the fill planned for the site is expected 3 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC 49703 SW Grady Way Site April 4, 1997 to be placed within the groundwater' table zone. The groundwater table was encountered in the borings but the holes were not left open a sufficient length of time for the water levels to stabilize. D. Seismicity Earthquake intensities vary depending upon the magnitude of the earthquake and the distance of the project site from the epicenter or causativefault. The site could be subject to substantial seismic events if past history represents the regional pattern. Four earthquakes between 5.5 and 7.0 magnitude have been centered within 20 to 50 miles of the site. Some of theseearthquakes caused significant damage in the Olympia and Seattle area in 1949 and 1965,respectively. Devl to ment at that time in the vicinityof the project site at that time was limited P with few engineered structures;therefore,there were no reports of local damage. Site conditions are conducive for shaking and potential liquefaction. These forces must be considered in design. The Uniform Building Codei(UBC) Seismic Zonation Map(1994)places the site in Seismic Zone 3. The UBC recommends that the seismic,'zone factor(Z)be 0.30. Site coefficients are: soil type,S3,with an"S"factor of 1.5. Bedrock is located approximately 100 feet below ground surface,and very dense soils were identified at a depth of 26.5 to 27.5 feet. Soils b Low 27.5 feet have a seismic shear wave velocity in excess of 500 feet per second. Generally,soils that are susceptible to liquefaction are loose,saturated,uniform grades,fine-grained sand that lie within 60 feet of the groundsurface. The soils identified onsite below 27.5 feet generally consist of dense to very dense coarse sand and graviel to an estimated depth of about 100 feet. These soils will not liquefy under earthquake loading. • III. Conclusions and Recommendations A. General It is our opinion that the site is suitable for construction of the proposed three-story commercial structure I from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The presence of dense to very dense sand below a depth of 27.5 feet is the primary consideration for site suitability. The loads incurred from fill,traffic,and pavement will result in settlement of less than two inches overall,and less than one inch of differential settlement from the soils within the upper 27 feet. Structural loads are expected to bear on the very dense sands at depths greater than 27.5 feet. 4 1 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 SWGradyiway Site April 4,1997 LI The commercial structure proposed at the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW Gra Way may be supported on a pile foundation. We recommend a floating slab floor if some differential settlemeint is tolerable: Otherwise,a structural floor is recommended. This foundation may be constructed after the present surface is filled to fmal grade and when a dry working surface is established. As long as the fill is not to be used for structural bearing,the fill may be placed on top of the existing vegetation surface following mowing d removal'of trees and debris. The area can then be backfilled with fill compacted to a minimum of 90 per nt of maximum dry density in the upper 50 percent of the fill. The engineered fill should consist of dry,compted, imported structural fill with the source previously approved by a geotechnical engineer. Slab support can be provided by existing soils provided some settlement can be tolerated. If the proposed structure is moved to the north side of the property and constructed as a one-story facility,the low be ' g capacity'of the native soils must be taken into consideration. A base course of imported soil will be regi}ired to raise the,slab elevation to final grade inside of the footing area. All base course soil must be compacted o 90 percent of maximum dry density. The parking lot area will be constructed on fill up to 10 feet thick. The present surface may be stri ped of wet,soft sediments. Fill can be placed over organic debris following the mowing of surface vegetation. Compaction of the engineered ered fill should start after two feet of fill has been placed over the present surf ce. Fill � • r control should conform to the requirements of Section B.5 and B.6 of this report. We recommend that our firm review the final design and specifications to confirm that earthwork d foundation recommendations presented in this report have been properly interpreted and implemented in the ( ' design and specifications We also recommend that a representative from American Engineering Corp°fation be present onsite during foundation excavation to verify that subsurface conditions are as anticipated,and that ' competent bearing soil is exposed as anticipated. We can assume no responsibility for the misrepresentation of our recommendations if we do not review the plans and specifications,and monitor the earthwork. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should be incorporated in the desi and construction of the project to minimize any soils and/or foundation-related problems. Detailed earthwor and foundation recommendations for use in design and construction of the project are presented in the following sections. L ' 5 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 SW Grady Way Site - April 4, 1997 B. Earthwork111 1. Clearing and Site Preparation The building and parking areas should be cleared of all obstructions and debris. Holes resulting from the removal of large underground obstructions should be cleared and backfilled with suitable imported material. We recommend that fill be placed after existing vegetation is mowed or compacted into the surface. The initial two feet of fill will not require compaction. This work should be carried out under the observation of a geotechnical engineer. After the initial two feet of fill is placed,the remaining fill should be placed in accordance with Section B.6, Compaction(below). No stripping is required. All loose wood debris,trash,tree limbs and stumps should be removed. 2. Temporary Excavations Foundation excavation depths including utility trenches should comply with local,state,and federal safety regulations. Specifically,the current OSHA Health and Safety Standards for excavations,29 CFR Part 1926, should be followed. We understand that these regulations are to be strictly enforced,and if they are not closely followed,the owner and contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor's"responsible person as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926"'should evaluate soil exposed in excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. 3. Subgrade Preparation After the completion of clearing and filling with the initial two feet of engineered fill in areas to receive structural fill,slabs-on-grade or pavement,the surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches,moisture- conditioned to(or slightly above)optimum water content,and compacted to structural fill requirements. 4. Engineered Fill Layer Any footings and slabs will be founded in engineered fill. We recommend that any engineered fill layer be a minimum of two feet thick under footings and paving. Any existing grades onsite that are presently at grade should be over-excavated to two feet below grade,scarified,and backfilled using imported structural fill. The excavated onsite material which meets the requirements of Fill Material(Section III.B.5 of this report)should be stockpiled and later used as fill. The exposed surfaces should then be prepared in accordance with Section III.B.3 6 i I Geotechnical Engineering Investigation C#9703 SW Grady Way Site Apri1 4, 1997 of this report: Subgrade Preparation. Onsite soil or imported fill should be compacted in accordance with Section t__ III.B.6 of jis report: Com action. I� 5. Fill Material Based on our surface reconnaissance,it is our opinion that the excavated railroad grade soils can be —� recompacted if they are at Optimum moisture content and if construction takes place during dry weather. y excavated soils that do not meet the requirements of structural fill should not be used or mixed with any f ll I - i material,and should be disposed of offsite or used only for landscaping. All ill placed at the site including onsite soil should not contain rocks or liunps larger than 6 inches in greatest dimension with not more than 15 percent larger than 2.5 inches. Onsite soil that contains rocks greater than 2.5 inches nominal diameter should be mechanically raked,screened,or replaced by imported fill with the correct size distribution. addition,imported fill should be predominantly granular with a plasticity index(PI) � I of 12 or less. All Mill material should be placed at,or slightly below the optimum moisture content. If the materi s are too wet to be compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density,it will be necessary to dry the fill materia,mix with lime;or replace the soil to achieve required compaction. Imported structural fill will be observed and tested using modified Proctor Compaction tests to determine the required compaction efficiency to attain the required 90 percent of maximum dry density. The quality of the structural fill will determine the density of compaction tests required during fill construction. 6. Compaction �Y y All�structural fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM Designation D1557-78. F 1 material should be spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. 7. Surcharge The native soils underlying the site consist of non-plastic clay and fine sand that has the potential f r settlement. Our analysis shows that settlement could be up to 2 inches with differential settlement of up o 1 inch. If this level of movement is not acceptable,we recommend that the area outside of the drainage way and abandoned railroad grade be surcharged by 2 feet of imported soil. The surcharge soils may later be used to bring the rest of the site to fmal grade. 7 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 SW Grady Way Site April4, 1997 In the event that a single-story structure is located on the northern portion of the property,we strongly recommend that the area outside of the railroad grade be surcharged for at least 90 days to reduce the potential for differential settlement. Settlement gages should be installed to determine when the settlement reaches a suitable level. If 3 feet of surcharge is used,suitable settlement may be obtained in a shorter interval. 8 Trench Backfill Utility trenches can be baclilled with native soils or imported fill placed in lifts of approximately 6 inches in uncompacted thickness. Thicker lifts can be used provided the method of compaction is approved by a representative from American Engineering Corporation and the required minimum degree of compaction is achieved. The backfill material should be compacted by mechanical means to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. Imported sand can be used for backfilling trenches provided it is compacted to at least 95 percent and sufficient water is added during the trench backfilling operations to prevent the soil from bulking during compaction. The upper 3 feet of trench iackfills in slab and pavement areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction for onsite soils and where imported sand backfill is used. 9. Drainage Interim drainage control measures during construction,and permanent facilities in the completed development,are proposed by they applicant. (See the Technical Information Report:Stormwater Drainage; American Engineering Corporation,April 1997). Onsite soils have been classified using the Unified Soils Classification System(USCS). Surficial soils are non-plastic to slightly plastic clay'to a depth of about 12 feet. This soil mantles practically all of the site. The clay is underlain by medium to fine,loose to dense sand. The surficial soil would be classified as Type C soil with a moderate to high runoff potential. The soil group mapped by SCS is"Urban"(Ur). Because of the shallow water table located at the base of the clay topsoil at an approximate depth of 12 feet,that the site is poorly configured for rapid drainage,and that the soil exhibits a slow water conductivity,the natural drainage conditions are very poor. Regrading new slopes to catchment facilities will reduce soil saturation. Containing ,r! existing stream flow will reduce natural surface water infiltration and minimize additions to the water table. 8 L j Geolechnical Engineering Investigation C#9703 SW Grady ,Wary Site April 4,1997 � I 9.1 Drainage Water should not be allowed to pond in any areas where foundations,slabs,or pavements are to be constructed. Water that is encountered during foundation excavation should be pumped out of the excava ions. Alternatively,excavations can be sloped toward one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water should then be diverted to a positive and permanent point of discharge. 9.2 Drainage Measures Long-term drainage measures should include(1)grading,(2)perimeter footing drains,and(3)slab moisture barriers. Design of a sto water detention system is not part of this study. Each of these is discussed below. 9.2.1 Grading j ! Positive surface gradients should be provided adjacent to the building to direct surface water away om foundations and slabs toward suitable discharge facilities. We recommend that the ground be sloped at a minimum 3 percent gradie t for a distance at least 10 feet away from the structure. Similarly,roof downs outs should be connected to sui able discharge facilities. Ponding of surface water should not be allowed adjacent to the structure or on pavements. 9.2.2 Perimeter Footing Drains We recommend the installation of footing drains around the perimeter of the structure. These drains should i consist of a 4-inch minimum diameter,perforated or slotted,rigid drain pipe laid with the perforations or slots facing down at,or just below,the invert of the footing with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. The drain line should be bedded on,surrounded by,and covered with a free-draining material that meets the requirements of '�I Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)Standard Specifications,Section 9-03.12(2). See Table 1. ;,`' Table 1. WDOT Standard Specifications,Section 9-03.12(2) U.S.Sieve Size Percent Passing* 4"square 100 1/41' square 25—70 N . 200 5.0 max. *All percentages are by Weight. A typical drain detai is provided on Figure 4. Once drains are installed,with the exception of the upper 6 inches,the excavation can be backfilled with a granular fill material(natiiie soil or imported fill). The surface 6 inches of fill should consist of compacted and 9 I Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 I f SW Grady Way Site April 4,1997 relatively impermeable soil. It can be separated from the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of geofabric or visqueen. The surface should be sloped to drain away from the building wall. Alternatively,the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete paving. All footing drain lines should be connected to a positive discharge,i.e. storm drain or infiltration system. 10. Slab Moisture Barrier ,- To mitigate the passage of moisture through the foundation slab,we recommend that a capillary break consisting of 4 inches of free-draining gravel covered with an impermeable membrane moisture barrier(10 mil visqueen)be placed between the subgrade soil and the slab(Figure 5). The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of moist sand for protection during construction. 11. Construction During Wet-Weather Conditions If construction proceeds during or shortly after wet-weather conditions,the moisture content of onsite soils will be above optimum. Consequently,subgrade preparation,placement and/or reworking of onsite and structural fill will not be possible. Alternative wet-weather construction recommendations can be provided by American Engineering Corporation in the field just prior to construction,if appropriate. 12. Guide Specifications All earthwork should be performed in accordance with the Guide Specifications for Site Earthwork presented in Appendix C. Appendix D presents the Guide Specifications for Asphalt Paving. These specifications are general in nature. Final specifications should incorporate all recommendations in this report. 13. Monitoring �I Settlement monuments should be used to monitor settlement as fill is placed onsite. Six gages should be placed at locations of deepest fill and surveyed bi-weekly during filling and after completion until deformation ceases or the deformation level is less than 10 percent of the previous measurement period. The fill will require field testing to ensure adequate compaction effort. We recommend test services in each layer using a nuclear density gage,operated by a certified soils technician. 10 I _ I ! Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 SW Grady Way Site Apri14, 1997 C. Foundation Support 1. Spread Footing Lr Foundation areas should be prepared as described in Sections III.B-3 and III.B-4 of this report. An conventional footings can be designed on the basis of the following criteria: —' • I Allowable bearing pressure on compacted structural fill or concrete lean mix,including all dea• and live loads 1,000 psf • . A one-third increase in the bearing capacity can be used when considering short term transient loads. • I Minimum dep of perimeter footing below adjacent final exterior grade to account for frost penetration 18 inches Continuous footing should be designed with adequate top and bottom reinforcing to provide struc al iI continuity and permit spanning of local irregularities. Footings located adjacent to other footings or utility trenches should bear below an imaginary 1.5:1 h' (horizontal to vertical)plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the adjacent footings or utility tre ch. 2. Piles ~ Because of the potentially liquefiable fine to medium sand layer located about 11.5 to 28.0 feet below Lj Iground surface,we are providing information for optional pile support of the proposed structure. The sit soil \, profile consists of approximately 12 feet of sandy clay and 16 feet of saturated medium to fine,loose sand(N= I 8)underlain by very dens I,coarse sand to the maximum depth of exploration: 51.5 feet. �' The following table(Table 2)provides pile embedment depths into the bearing soils and pile lengths below , existing ground surface blsed on present soil conditions. These lengths take into consideration the effects of the `H structural load and downdrag of the soil layer overlying the loose sand. - I Table 2. Pile Embedment and Pile Lengths I 1 I Pile Bearing Capacity,kips I 20 30 40 50 H' Em,edment Length Embedment Length Embedment Length Embedment Length Pile Diameter ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft 12 inches 13 41 20 48 26 54 33 61 j 16 inches 10 38 16 44 20 48 25 53 20 inches 8 36 12.5 40.5 17 45 20 48 r 1 11 r Il Geotechnical Engineering Investigation AEC#9703 SW Grady Way Site April4, 1997 These pile lengths are based on the following soil parameters: Modulus of subgrade reaction 10 pci Coefficient of Friction: 0— 12 feet 15E 12-27.5 feet 35E 27.5 feet—Below; 45E Wet Density: 0— 12 feet 110 pcf 12—27.5 feet 100 pcf 27.5 feet—Below 120 pcf Dry Density: 0- 12feet 120pcf 12—27.5 feet 125 pcf 27.5 feet—Below 135 pcf Cohesion: 0— 12 feet ; Concrete pile 250—500 psf Steel pile 250—500 psf Piles will extend into the native soils that exhibit Standard Penetration Test(SPT),N—values of 30 or greater. As the structure design is not yet defined,we have not yet determined whether to recommend augercast, concrete or steel piles. We recom end that the depth to zero lateral deflection be within the lower bearing layer and the pile caps be tied together so the piles maintain a high level of stiffness. The reinforcing cage,if augercast piles are used,should extend a minimum of two feet below the point of zero deflection,with the center bar extending to the bottom of the hole. Steel or concrete reinforced piles may be driven to the recommended embedment lengths provided the driving blow count indicates adequate bearing is attained. Appendix B of this report contains testing results for the cone penetrometer tests(CPT). These tests indicate sand lenses in the interval between 13 and 27 feet that may contribute additional bearing capacity to the • piles. However,greater emphasis has been placed on the N—values from the Standard Penetration Tests(SPT) that show values below 8 to about 22 feet in boring B-1,and to about 12 feet in B-2. The CPT tests in three locations show bearing sands at depths of 26.5 and 27.5 feet from west to east across the site. A conservative I depth of 28 feet has been used for pile design recommendations. 12 L_j Geotechnical Engineering Investigation C#9703 SW Grady Way Site April 4, 1997 If the structural engineer requires additional information for design,please contact us. 3. Slab—on—Grade Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional shallow foundations provided that interior slab foundation zone is placed on structural fill or crushed rock(Figure 5). Slab-on-grade subgrade surfaces hould be �( -; proof-rolled to provide a smooth unyielding surface for slab support. Slab reinforcing should be provide in —' accordance with the anticipated use and loading conditions. If the slab is supported on the engineered fill,slab damage,in the form of warping,cracking,and separation --' caused by differential settlement,may occur. The slab will then require periodic maintenance. If the situ)tion is acceptable from an economic standpoint,then this option for slab support can be used. We recommend that the i— slab be reinforced with#44 rebars, 18 inches on center. However,the slab should be designed by a struc al In engineer for the anticipat led use and loading. 1 ' We recommend that a structural slab be constructed in the proposed structures. This method wouldkninimize damage (resulting from differential settlement. If settlement can be tolerated, the slab could be float on the engineered fill subgrade. A joint should be established between pile columns and the slab to control fractures. `, 4. Settlement Li The clayey topsoil d potentially liquefiable fine sands of foundation soils indicate that settlement could be as much!as two inches wi differential settlements of about one inch. All base courses under paving must be J compacted to 95 percent or maximum dry density. We expect that a minimum of two feet of engineered fill i-- compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density will underlay the entire parking area. Some areas will ; i ` have up to 10 feet of fill. Differential settlement of the parking area will be contingent on the efficiency btained in utility trench backfilling. 5. Resistance of Late al Loads Proposed building lateral load resistance can be accomplished by installing grade beams between Ile caps, i l the stiffness of the piles, . d soil resistance. An upper soil layer friction coefficient of 0.25 is consider applicable. 1 1 I 1 k ! 13 (- - I Geotechnical Engineering Investigation' AEC 49703 SW Grady Way Site April 4,1997 I � D. Pavements Pavement subgrade areas should be prepared as described in Sections III.B-3 and III.B-6 of this report, Subgrade Preparation and Compaction. We recommend that the pavement section for light automobile traffic consist of two inches of asphalt concrete over four inches of compacted crushed rock base that meets the requirements of WDOT Standard Specifications,Section 9-03.9(3). In areas of the site to be used by heavy truck traffic,we recommend four inches of asphalt over six inches of crushed rock. The latter section may be appropriate in the parking area where heavy delivery trucks will travel. The above pavement section recommendations assume that subgrade soils will remain relatively dry and stable prior to placing any fill,base course,or paving,and that all utility trenches will be backfilled with soil using the recommended degree of compaction. IV. Construction Observation The analysis,designs,opinions,and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon our site observations,knowledge of the site and experience with projects within the area. Variations of subsurface conditions from those analyzed or characterized in the report are possible and may become evident during construction. In that event,it maybe advisable to reevaluate certain analyses or assumptions. We recommend that our firm be retained to provide geotechnical services during site grading,foundation excavation,subgrade preparation and backfilling to observe compliance with the design concepts,specifications, and recommendations presented in'this report. Our presence will also allow us to modify the design if - unanticipated subsurface conditions are encountered. V. Report Preparation This report was prepared by U.Bielefeld,Engineering Geologist,with field services provided by Conetec of Vancouver,B.C. This report was prepared under the supervision of a registered professional engineer of the State of Washington. LFF ( • jibt _1lAilt#SMIL A _LA .1 RI J. ELEFELD,CEG I �. ' • 04'E .tf . .$ 33190� i//917 r 14 L CPIRES 05-07- - - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION JAMIE PIERRE SW GRADY WAY SITE AEC #9703 , ll Figures Section Figure 1. Vicinity Plan s 1_ Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. Site Cross-Sections Figure 4. Typical Footing Drain Detail Figure 5. Typical Slab-on-Grade Design Detail i • 1 mod ,\ ' ` \ \ -� ' .o — - ° 1 \'- H I :I o �� a r� : i T .� �I• \\-ON 1:i:. W I Si.. ° .� I� BM 51.4 \ 1 \ colonic.: . ii , ....:.:1:.::-,0:-,-,::•:!0: . 16 :!..'?;:ififsSiiti 1 •.0 Mal 1 \*,._i_ -Mliall4k4;i ,-S‘ 6111"60 -- Sr " wdOkb •'.', tAildliank!,,_, -Imikim 1,4 1 I Ail I I I i �semi C'1, .1; :`C X In::;: i }:I iit, 0,•, I. 'r�� r • 1ki1LT:ti � 'AIilil® .. j•':A � loll®. -El P \' -;- 1111;Zihr/1 :,,, ,,-„„.. gml op yol-allib•—•.--.4 - i ,....1/4... ,,,, r--,-- ...., 007,.,-,,;.-_--- —mx,--•:::; :. 1... 1-/,•I st....i., -: 1:11611111Mil! . . v - \ 4.1t7j �.\ •tail:L ii Pa o Parkti"/I `, — Soh— J -�- / / R �3 -I . . a ^ -Ity� Iit . _ 7 `� r.,,..., ,sier*,:z. ,.. . \N-11PE1....irklidtg 02 7-.., . -....y, ---4 fil -o f _ � ,� �. •� � I� �� / y•� , � � % :m\-'-- 111111 Iiii Iiiihoriligo,'_'-' _'(---- -3 arlington limo, 4 �I � ' '- , atlort- , =' Gd Course . \ ■ °zo+.� p I ^ p /,,`\ ,III iris my J; �°' \.• -' • Se � Substa II ; N ^ j ■•Q�0lsos �® �m 4; IV-I • '.' g . 'y 23 `, ` ,. I S�� . . c ..,-.4c1 Hit ta (jar , r9 :I Ir1-�c,„.. )..r, , f ' � II ' i . ' y • �-, � ' o~ e - � - j ' ! L ,,,,, '4/;.. ; `. I o , pmI=_ / • - 1 \ I I � I�. - ..I I 0 I I I J2 = / .-�.i ^ : •From: USGS Renton 7.5 X15 Quadrangle Sheet Scale: 1 "=200 - Vicinity Map L American Engineering Corporation _ 1116111111111Allikk. Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and Grady • 2 148121 Ave. E.RaCmarid.'NA 98052 Profec No. I Oast I ct;tas ' 9703 . 1 3-24-.97 No. 1 I ' I I ,------__________j • Ili verve Oakesa:a - •A o t.tri . k _, , 111 ' 141.10.:%. :Pe' o .. —'r-Z o II ' '.\1\ ..AO, • \ 0, 400.000i' - . 'T. ..._ �k �..t { I I 1a � o A 1�, ilk ° t\ \n •. • r io.a. oot Ill I 1 oom 1 t o\ \ %aIJ % $ CJ ' 0 I n 1 , \\\\ \ --•.,, ‘ .sl. \ !' i \\\\\ \ .\\ ) \ a+r \� t \" t \\\\ \\. t , l'itl \ \ . \ li N Ill 1;1 % \ I s l a i \1 _0 \ \, \\\\S i 12 .%4 • - \\‘' 1 M iu \ • I ., ,I 1 . 11 \ , . -\ \e • sr, 4. i i...r_. , • $ �� k 1,f., 111. , \. ‘ \ •-:',-. \ \ ii, R Ii , O r ` ! O al �� `t -."- $el\rt,i )1\ n+\ di ; . . , V \\ 10 4 . CI\ ' Powell ''venue i ♦%4• $ nas o �i .. .- off l I °.�, . , a ] . • ,, .. III PO- ® ¢' to N 0 I LB m n o N n o • o a n w u' o w \ 1 . 0 N fi H \ \ (I) � i N En . rt to r American tnpinoon • Plmrwn • fwvoror• 11s. Ma o.wrr• i. or• b '-' JAMIE PIERRE—GRADY WAY Enpinaarinp .oi,1w,,A..kL >d. O Corporation "''�'"~°"�� u.w, t' - too' l V ,, w CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN J.B.C ,' KKK(mq�-quo w(xa)m-mi °i4"� C.G. I n•..IA•N . Chec• ked C.G. I 1 �1 r r r Vertical Scale: 1 " = 10 ' Horizontal Scale: 1 " = 100 ' — D $ • Z 11Y.7 6 % % {..367.7 3 • k I L_1757 FIlo6 ,w I I L 02.00 - ! ! �-"T_ f I i I -iT i1 _I_:_T-' I I I I u u moo 16aa6 1 saran =Al 1 J F •6f -- 50 � �, 1 If y V . aR CO .. st /^ Vey - § °a : gI Approximate Final Site Grade, Elevation 20.0 041o` ; WO .. �. .- e-z 8-6 et Cl S a 'N.A.1 — - — a 1-1 F. roost SC— C� cmi V --- U.DE,- SE -- - al I Lo.ei - — —a !� d = =�-DE�vSt! F = a /1 A w — Sr— ti ,.� 414 2 07 - - ' t.ao 2�a10 s.ao ..00 HOO 2.00 a wa ___ DrNSE 9703 -� V. DENSE Figure 3 1 a 1 I • i • I • ( �r-- • ! L0 *fin ;.1.0.t.,. . p� ▪ S-t-• .Jr. \ h nginirnum - �- _ — _ _ r- t ,•- B-ino ti_ --: !�-:~-=-- v VisausenI ••!• �C''�s.•L.;.?• •::•• !▪ •..: •▪ �- �ir 18-inert minimum ••'..i.. .▪•▪ : :.•.▪ '. '•.e1.o. •••::!-_.' '.'!'''';•!: 16 i 1 4-4ach minimum diameter `•, 65'p 6+:nch 1 minirflurrl • QSurface Seal: native or other low permeability material. . Gravel backfill for walls; - . ,r4 Fine Aggregate fbr Portland Cement Concrete l . ODrain Pipe. Perforated or Slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots fam sin e dog, tight jointed, with a positive gradient. {-, i Do not use flexible or corrugated plastic pipe. x Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. cj - r SCHEMATIC - NOT TO SCALE J I. • • �_ I American Engineering. Jamie-Pierre, Oakesdale and Grady Corporation ' 1 • TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL PROJECT NO. DATE '� 4032148th Aeenu.NE a Redmond',WA 98052 • . FIGURE • TeL(205)881.7430.Fie.(206)8e1.7731 9703 . 3-2 6-.9 7= - Ni 4 FT 1 1 , II I J • . 1 . ' • • Approximate Finished Grade . ° Slab-on-Grade ! Two inch moist Sand Two inches Visqueen membrane soil lavers • • • . •• • • • 0 0 r 1 . , 18" 10; . , a 7--- ./ 1 4 °Footing --'. Q•- Gravel base course Native Soil, undisturoed 1 • 1- 1 • SCHEMATIC ONLY NOT TO SCALE I I 4 The, soils should be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent. • • erican Engineering Carpacaticrt Typical Slab-on-Grade Design Detail! Li . . ]_ Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and Grad Way • _ i il ,.. 14itts Ave.NE.,Roamand,WA 9 O= Pro1sNa I Oats: I Free ' 9703 • I 3-26-97 Na 1 I , 1 II -1 I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION JAIME PIERRE SW GRADY WAY SITE AEC #9703 Appendix A Boring Logs I � i UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Major Divisions Igrf ltri I Description Major Divisions Igrf ltr I Description Well cededgravel orgravel-sand Inorganic silt and very tine sand. .i; W -g Iv(1 rock flour,silty or clayey fine sand I .rs mixtures,little or no fines Silts I or clayey silt with slight piaitteitv // Inorganic clay of low to medium Graveli.GP Poorly-graded gravel or gravel And //CL plasticity,gravelly clay,sandy Aini. sand mixtures,little or no tines Clays // clay,silty clay.lean clay I' LL < 50 Organic silt and organic silt�la of Gravely G Silty gravel,gravel-sand-silt Fine OL Y Soils oi.; I mixtureslow plasticity 1 _ . Grained Inorganic silt.micaceous or' 4 'GC Clayey gravel.gravel-sand-clay Soils MH diatomaceous fine or silty soil, 1 Coarse /� mixtures Silts elastic silt Grained y And _ Soils "`:-.S little or Hoed sand 3d or gravelly sand. Crays 1CH In rga a clay of high plastii ity, i LL > 50 Sand Poorly-graded sand or gravelly OH Organic clay of medium to high lasticit And ..:.-...:.`'`I' sand,little or no tines P Y • Sandy 1 ' Soils :''.SIyf Silty sands,sand-silt mixtures Highly Organic 'Pt Peat and other highly organ.c Soils ' soils SC CIayey sand,sand-clay mixtures I SYMBOLS Standard penetration split-spoon sample a_ Blank casing ® '� Modified California(Porter)sample I Screened cuing 1 a Grab(Cuttings)sample g Cement grout • Water level observed in boring g Bentonite �=--7I E Stable water level in monitoring well Li Filter pack =I -1 Sands and Gravels I Blows per Foot Silts and Clays I Blows per Foot Very Loose I 0_4 Very Soft I 0-2 Soft I 2-4 __ _ Loose I 4- 10 Ftrn 4-8 Medium Dense 10-30 Stiff 8-16 ' . Dense I I 30-50 Very-Stiff I 16-32 Very Dense Over 50 Hard I Over 32 I . Note(1): Penetration resistance values are recorded as the number of blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30-inches required to drive a sampler through the last 12 inches of an 18-inch drive. Blow count for samples obtained using a' Modified California sampler(indicated by an asterisk)should be multiplied by a factor of 0.8 to obtain equivalent standard penetration resistance values. • Note(2): The lines sep rating strata on the logs represent approximate boundaries only. No warranty is provided as to the continuity of soil strata between borings. Logs represent the soil section observed at the boring location on the date of drilling only. II 1 . . BORING LOG LEGEND • American Engineering Corporation • JAMIE PIERRE, OAKESDALE & Si GRADY WAY 4032 148th Ave.NE,Redmo nd,d,WA 98052 PROJECT NO. DATE - APPENDIX A —. 9703 3/28/97 - I = 1 , 1 j APPENDIX A—BORING LOGS Boring No. 1: Page 1 of 3 pages DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH OTHER (FEET) a. g TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE Z g ¢= o I I 0.0-11.5:Clay,fill;Clay with brick and rock Scift to slightly CI fragments,wet,coal and brick fill,highly plastic,low dry strength. Stiff 5 No Sam. 4/5/6 ' I 11.5-28.0:Sand;fine,wet,loose,quick dilatancy 10 No Sam. 3/3/3 Loose Sp Water Ta d Adding water to hole. 15 B-1-1 2/3/2 20 B-1-2 3/2/6 40.5 Gradation • I , Trace of gravel with thin layers of clay, high dilatancy. American Engineering EXPLORATORY BORING LOG Corporation�° Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way PROJECT N° DATE BORING 4032 148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 -1 Tel.(206)881-7430 •Fax.(206)881-77311 9703 3-21-97 NO. �+ 9703BORE.LOG J. II APPENDIX A-BORING LOGS Boring No. 1: Page of 3 pages DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION _ DEPTH J pc`� a g OTHER (FEET) i gli 01 .. it/ TESTS l DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE a =a+ (1) w 0 Continued: 1 Sp 25 B-1-3 5/8/4 Thin less than 6 inch layers of clay with 1 organic content. - 1 28.0-Botom:Sand;coarse with gravel, pebble size,mixed with fine sand,high Very dense Sp-Gp dilatancy,traces of brick-like fragments; 30 8-1-4 45/45/20 possibly coal present. , _ l 1 I Sand;coarse,with fine gravel,trace of Very dense Gp 35 B-1-5 20/20/18 11.6 1 Gradation sand,wet lI _ I pi 1 r 40 -I, Gravel in coarse sand. Very dense Gp B-1-6 25/29/30 1 x 45 " [ Very dense Sp B-1-7 15/23/30 Sand,coarse,upper soils probably same., American Engineering EXPLORATORY BORING LOG Corporation 1 I Jamie Pierre,Oakesdale and SW Grady Way PROJECT N° DATE BORING 4032148th Avenue NE•Redmond e,WA 98052 NO. B-1 Tel.(206)881-7430 •Fax.(206)881-7731 9703 3-21-97 I 1 - 1 1 9703BORE.LOG I I . APPENDIX A-BORING LOGS Boring No. 1: Page 3 of 3 pages DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION j DEPTHLIJ ` OTHER (FEED y c` 2 TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE a c ' Continued: 50 B-1-8 25/30/18 5.8 Gradation For2' Bottom of Hole:51.5 feet. Backfilled with drilled material. I - I I I - 4 I I _ I I � American Engineering j EXPLORATORY BORING LOG Corporation Jamie Pierre,Oakesdale and SW Grady Way PROJECT Na DATE BORING •1 4032148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 NO, B-1 Tel.(206)881-7430 •Fax.(206)881-7731 9703 3-21-97 I I I 'I 9703BORE.LOG I , I I 1 APPENDIX A—BORING LOGS Boring No.2: Pag 1 of 2 pages DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION (EPTTH, J u, c t OTHER k TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE 1g " 8 } 0.0-4.0:Sand,gravelly;dark gray brown, Very dense Sp moist,fill,organic-rich 4.0-12.0:Clay;wet,dark brown to black, Soft CI 5 No Samp 3/3/5 plastic,grass fibers 1 Organic,wood fiber,sand in shoe. 10 No samp 3/1/1 12.0-Bottom:Sand;fine,firmer than Med Dense Sp-Sc above,gray brown,wet 15 6'layer of pea gravel in sample Gp-Sc B-2-1 7/14/14 19.8 Gradation 20 - 1 Sand,fine,wet,gray black Dense Sc B-2-2 Blow 31.7 Gradation counts 11/14/23 l I American Engineering EXPLORATORY BORING LOG Corporation Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way fft5 "Oftag PROJECT N° DATE • BORING {� 4032 148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 NO. r-2 Tel.(206)r 881-7430 •Fax.(206)881-7731 9703 3-21-97 9703BORE.LOG II APPENDIX A—BORING LOGS Boring No.2: Page 2 of 2 pages DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB I DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH `S aR Q3 OTHER (FEET) 2 �,y TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS 'CONSIST SOIL TYPE Q zu, Continued:Sand,light gray,wet with Very dense Sc 25 gravel - B-2-3 20/24/24 30 Sand with fine gravel Very dense Sc B-2-4 18/40/45 i 35 Coarse sand Very dense Sp B-2-5 11/25/22 9.0 Gradation Coarse sand 40 B-2-6 14/29/30 I Bottom of Hole:41.5 feet,backfilled with Very dense Sp - hole cutfings • 45 i EXPLORATORY BORING LOG American Engineering Corporation Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way PROJECT N° DATE _ BORING pn 4032148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 NO. v G Tel.(206)881-7430 •Fax(206)881-7731 9703 3-21-97 9703BORE.LOG Il APPENDIX A-BORING LOGS 1 I Boring No.3: Page 1 of 1 pages 1 DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 T DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION _ DEPTH v—, a OTHER T (FEET) Q $1 s i TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE y Fig g 18 g E l II- _ 0.0-15.0:Clay;wet,with fine sand, Soft CI organics,yellow brown - 1 5 Soft CI B-3-1 1/1/1 I - l 10 I Trace of sand,blue gray,saturated Slightly stiff CI-Sp B-3-2 1/1/2 42 1 Atterberg Non-plastic T 15 I 15.0-Bottom:Sand;coarse,wet,blue Med dense Sc-CI B-3-3 4/6/12 gray,pebbles present. Bottom of Hole:Backfiiled with hole cuttings.' 20 - Hole is in parking lot,30 feet from Grady . Way and 110 feet from Powell. �-- American Engineering EXPLORATORY BORING LOG Corporation Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way PROJECT N° DATE 4032148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 BORING QQ Tel.(206)881-7430 ••Fax.(206)881-7731 9703 3-21-97 NO B-3' 1_ 1 9703BORE.LOG 1 II APPENDIX A—BORING LOGS Boring No.4: Page 1 of 1 pages DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH t OTHER (FEET) Q H ' TESTS c DESCRIPTION&REMARKS (CONSIST SOIL TYPE N n.�a 3 8 gs. 0.0-15.0:Clay;light yellow brown,wet, Slightly stiff CI plastic I 1 • 5 • Slightly stiff CI No samp 1/2/3 10 Clay Slightly stiff CI - B-4-1 1/1/2 45.7 T Atterberg Non- lastic I -- Becoming sandy. I i . 15 15.0-Bottom:Sand;blue gray,wet, Med dense Sc B-4-2 2/5/6 dilatant. Bottom of hole,backfilled with cuttings. . Hole located 30 feet away from Grady 20 - Way and 250 feet from Powell. 4 EXPLORATORY BORING LOG American Engineering Corporation Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way • PROJECT No DATE BORING A 4032 148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 91(169 NO. -4 Tel.(206)881-7430 •Fax(206)881-773t 9703 3-21-97 9703BORE.LOG ,i l APPENDIX A—BORING LOGS Boring No.5: Page 1 of 1 pages DRILLING METHOD: Rotary Auger SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.00 LOGGED BY: RJB DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 11.5 feet BORING DIAMETER: 4-inch DATE DRILLED: 2-28-97 L I E. DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPTH J p�`� �u v�—i o C OTHER l (FEET) < z a z o g, * 2 TESTS DESCRIPTION&REMARKS CONSIST SOIL TYPE y ,�'ay 3 . 0.0-14.0:Clay;yellow brown,wet, Slightly stiff CI 1* organic-rich 1 1 5 No camp 3/2/3 i 1 Rich in organics,all the way to the bottom of the hole. Fine sand lenses in samples. I l j 10 I B-5-1 1/1/2 45.7 1 Atterberg Non-plastic I l I 1 14.0-Bottom:Sand;blue gray,wet, 15 dilatant,organics,fine sand I Slight dense Sc B-5-2 1/3/7 , Bottom of hole,backfilled with hole cuttings, 1 I Hole located about 30 feet from SW Grady 20 i Way and 200 feet from Oakesdale. _I j EXPLORATORY BORING LOG 1 American Engineering Corporation Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady Way, I !� r PROJECT N° DATE BORING R 4032148th Avenue NE•Redmond r WA 98052 9703 3-21-97 NO' `"-5 Tel.(206)i881-7430 •Fax.(206)881-7731 9703BORE.LOG 1 �I I U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 314 112 34, 1 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140 200 100 ' 1 Tf' . .1 — J' I I� I I l I I I I 1 111 1 ► 90 ' 1 I \! ' ! . • 11 - - I � ' f 1 I ti 80 l l 11 11' II - I I P fIr I I� II' - E C E70 1; 11 F I _ I 1 , ( I I T6o I I I IIH I I - i E50 I I I i I I III I I (I I I I III i - R 1 III 1 III . Hill : . 111 I I ri1 1 1 . •1 1111I I 1111 ! I 111 1 11 11111 I, li 1 111 II III \ II III I I � I II I I 1 I • ! I [ A �30 HT I li ' IF I I II IIIli I I 1 .1 1 10 - 111 III II I `1 1 1 I 1 I • '-_ 111II II1 I 11 I1IIII IIII I 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL I SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse I 1 fine (coarse 1 medium 1 fine 1 Specimen IdentificationWC% %Gravel p� �� Classification � � %Sand � %Silt �C'ay • I a-i-. 1 $a>".d y Clay C ► 140,5 0 1 4' I 51 m • 8- i 7 5- Sari.(. S p 1 1l.6 2•i 17 3 6 f Al a - 1 , s 1SQnd s,o c. s 11 179 8 I I 1 II GRADATION CURVES, ASTM D-422 American Engineering Corporation 1 Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW ( rady 4032 148if1 Ave.NE•Redmond el WA 98052 Tel.(206)881-7430••Fax.,(206)881-7731 PROJECT No. DATE FIGURE 1 i 9703 3-28-97 No 10 ' . 1 1 , U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN DIC 3FS I U.S.SIEVE NUMBFLS I HYDRO ,=J. 6 4 11 2 1.5 1 3/4 112?/, 1 y 6 s 10 1416 10 70 40 SO 70 17140 2C° iG0 i 1 I 1 it1{�1 . -vr- !Mir i I i 1 I ti 90 • I '_ 1 I 1 I 111 • I I I I I I I 11 1 • I I s° 1 I 11 1 I II II , • ��I - 11 'III °I I ! P i I l I IIIIII a � II I . Il I III ► I l 1 I II T60 I I I I I \II I I I I 1 1 I ! F I I I I I klIII I JH II II I 111 11 I ; II IIII 111I -I I x 11 . E R-0 j 1 11 1 is 11 1 I 1 I II I - II I I 1 i j I I , Y Iji Iljl 11II il IIII IIII . i ! I 1 i ! j ! ;4III III ii Ii II11 ► 1j ! III III II 11 I 1 • 11I I ), E� II 1 illl 1I 1� II II , I Ill l . I f . � I I I 1 I 1 G .0 T I III III I: 11111 I III 1 . I • ;.. I I I I A° 1 III I : i IIIIII I I I I I I I III Ili 1 I ,IIILI I HI 10 I 11 I I II1111 f l I . 111 I I I I 1 1 1 it 1 1611i1 I 1111 I 1 1 1 I I I iI I ° II I111Iiji 11111111 i 1111 I I III I I I II I 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN Srz`:.'t MIL..'_zir r s I GRA`�77 I SAND I COBBLES I ccarse fine (coarse I medium I fine I SII.'OR C.11Y i ‘Scecitnen Identification •I ; Classification WC% I Cravei 1 %Sand ! %Silt %Cay 1, 4,• 1 I3- z -1 I So .e.L se )9.8 I IS I eo I S '- • I Q— z-z'. I SaTy SAN0 • Sm 131.7 !S I 6 7 I /8 - I 13- 2- 6 Sa„oly Grave { Gc. I 9. 0 1 6'3 I A2 I S I I GRADATION CURVES, ASTf D-422 I American Engineering Corporation, egiONNINAlh Jamie Pierre, Oakesdale and SW Grady 4032 148th Ave.NE•Redmond•WA 98052 Tel.(206)881-7430•Fax.(206)881-7731 . PROJECT No. DATE FIGURE • _ .9703 I 3-28-9 / I No 11 i 60► i I r I r • --COMPARING SOILS AT EQUAL.LIQUID LIMIT ' 30 —Toughness and dry strength increase wi#h �ncreasinq pisticity index.. 1j W O, 1-Z L/H 1 30 - , , v i' ZO —10r O. I p _._..di. ASH t M1,- I { ML _Ai 1 I, 0 10 20 30 : 40 40 60 10 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART FOR LABORATORY CLA$$IFICATION OF FINE GRAINED SOILS _ • • I Sample Identification Classification L L i P L MC % Bore Hole Number : 6-3 8-3-2 Cloy - So.�o,. 31 AL P 4Z )3- g ' .8-9— I L limy :,.ti,i., 3 9. N.P 4. 7 14 T 6-5-) C1a/ 3 : 35 N. /2 4J3 it i 1 i Atterberg Limits Test Results American Engineering Corporation Grady Way SW Site 4032 148th Avenue NE•Redmond•WA 98052 Project N Date Fi Tel.(206)881-7430•Fx.(206)881-7731 Ng 12 9703 March 12,1997 • , 41 I f� GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION JAMIE PIERRE SW GRADY WAY SITE AEC #9703 Appendix B Cone Penetration Tests I � ld l I I I—� � I I � 1 ConeTec CON E E C Environmental and Geotechnical In Situ Testing Contractors Canada: Vancouver B.C., Edmonton Alta. USA: Warren, NJ, Denver, CO, Pacheco, CA, Signal Hill, CA ASIA: Hong Kong Electric Cone Testing The cone penetrationtests (CPT) were carried out by ConeTec using an integrated electronic cone. A 10 ton compression type cone was used for all of the soundings. This cone has a tip area of 10 sq. cm. and a friction sleeve area of 150 sq. cm. The compression cone is designed with a J ! equal end area friction sleeve and a tip end area ratio of 0.85. A porewater pressure filter wasil located directly behind the cone tip. The filter was made of porous plastic and was 5.0 mm thick. Each of the porewater pressure filters was saturated in glycerin under vacuum pressure prior to penetration. Porewater pressure dissipation was recorded at 5 second intervals during pauses n penetration. The cone was also instrumented to record shear waves. The equipment and procedures for conducting the wave velocity measurements have been described by Robertson et al. (1986). The cone was capable of recording the following parameters at varying depth intervals: Tip Resistance (Qc) Sleeve Friction (Fs) - Dynamic Penetration Pore Pressure(Ut) Temperature (T) Cone Inclin'ation (I) u t Shear and compression wave velocities (Vs) and (Vp) Resistivity (f-m) The above parameters can be printed simultaneously on a printer and stored on a floppy disk for future analysis and reference. All cone penetration testing was carried out in accordance with ASTM D-3441. A complete set of baseline readings were taken prior to and at the completion of each sounding to determine temperature shifts and any zero load offsets. Corrections for temperature shifts and zero load offsets can be extremely important, especially when the recorded loads are relatively small. In sandy soils, however,these corrections are generally negligible. Graphical plots of all CPT data are presented with this report. The inferred stratigraphic profile at each CPT test location may be included with this report. The _ stratigraphic interp 9etations are based on relationships between cone bearing, Qt, sleeve friction, Fs, and dynamic pore pressure, Ut. The friction ratio, (Fs/Qt) is a calculated parameter which is used to identify the type of soil and hence gives an indication of its behavior. Generally, soft ii cohesive soils have high friction ratios, low cone bearing pressures and generate large porewa er pressures during penetration. Cohesionless soils have lower friction ratios, high cone bearing pressures and generate little in the way of porewater pressure during penetration.The classification of soils is based on correlations developed by Robertson et al. (1986). It is not always possible to clearly identify a soil type based on Qt and Fs alone. Experience,judgment and analyses of porewater pressure generation during penetration and subsequent dissipation were used in arriving i at soil type in these ambiguous situations. I ' C i1' -:i a ss t 1-i:c #iron:, h a r __ :- (after Robertson-' O)--_-_ ___=_ 11 Non-Normalized Classification Chart loco ..:..:..... vtg. v Y,•1 ,drys, ::ry 7 VI 4 fi `�' 'firt �c:1 ^ • 1 !" - ':o: ��Fi 4 -4 i 5 5'F 1 0 1 2 3 ' 4 5 6 7 8 Friction Ratio (%), Rf r , Normalized Classification Chart y loon __ .: ,• `. ':,M.........•r ,,.�.:.:.........n.>... . ... ,__ 'Qn>�:-� : tIxC' �8�fiatiio�rType _.';�.;.�,... . :�.. :.!...,.....r:�r1„�,� . Ah?1. .�_=din:_2_-�. se11si6Vefiit�'::.`i►e - '�' _. i'3gi..rii . :: _.:__:_.iG=�L_ _.- rtE:F p1.G!�fif_w_: t7 > v iq ell =_ 1: andy_atoctayey_.s __ .:_ :.:::.�^:t 5t11 tia[If>€t�:,Sd' Bllt' - :.:!J.,7. ,,�..,,.rye �. I. ..�: ;.......... ,:.:;.;;a_,r.;.:...:. :r,.;.!. c .2:4 .,. �$c.,9 � - --- --- _ — y ...,.. i^.nljw '. .:, • .. .:_.SQ:='�11_. _ t':: 'bit a,ems. vC� �'c4 -...:::.: • To 8 • •>.s` _, Te z �e��� • \ s°7•3•&4 ;. 1 1 F • 0.1 1 10 Normalized Friction Ratio s x 100% 1,, ,gt"6vo CONE EC A Geotechnica! and Environmental II 1 In nesting Contractors Estimation of Ground Water Table 1, from CPT Dissipation Tests I Dissipate('of Pore Pressure(u)In NC Clay - 1 U ue lI a U0-equilbrium pore pressure 1 0 AlI time I a Surfa (1,I l k• I• P tion of Pare c, Sand 's9 a' Pressure u In � a�s . -�-- .-R r4 - ww 0. 4, ti< k 70;f ,.3,y t111 t .i r Water Table Ue-equi5brium pore pressure l Dcone 0 time I. Hwater Dissipation of Pore Pressure(u)in Dense sand i I U Dilative Silt and HewlNewt'',OC Clay .� Pore Pressure (u) Lie - measured here I Dcone -Depth of Cone (ue-equiirium pore pressure r Dwater-Depth to Water Table o Hwater-Head of Water time Water Table Calculation Dwter = Dcone H water _L 1 where Hwater = Ue (depth units) Useful Conversion Factors: 1 psi = 0.704m = 2.31 feet (water) ' 1 tsf = 0.958 bar= 13.9 psi 1 m = 3.28 feet . iI J CONE EC ,' • _l { T CONE EC I I American Engineering Site: 97-502 CPT-1 BT Cone: 10 TON A 027 Location: GRADY WAY Date: 03:0397 10:52 Qt •tsf Fs tsf Rf % U f t. SBT 0 200 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 0 25 0 12 —0.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I III ' I l l l l l l l l ..,...: I I I I I ti; Silt ';':; ; Sandy Silt 1 nnim. —5.0 ?'' silt ----- -- --— -— --- - - — - - -- -- - - ------------ - --- -- - -- - --- Clayey Silt —, ",„.: , sat !1: —10.0 .•,,,.; Silty Sand/Sand 4 : iiig:r Sandy Sat Silty Sand/Sand a '. : il� o -15.0 r/•`�' "' Sand • ?:i1 �`�y �nY Silty Sand/Sand 20.0 :F ,:;• ,, •rF.,;rf Sand Sandy Silt sniSilt � Silty Send/Sand Nagl Sandy Silt ' silt —25.0 C-:-- s.---- — —30.0- Max. Depth: 25.36 (ft) SB'l' Soil Behavior Type (Robertson and Campanella 1988) Depth Inc.: 0.082 (ft) " t I CONE EC i American Engineering Site: 97-502 CPT-2 BT Cone: 10 TON A 027 Location: GRADY WAY Date: 03:03:97 11:55 Ot tsf Fs tsf Rf % U ft. SBT ---: -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - ---- - -- - ---- rn 0.0 1.0 0.0- - --5.0 0 25 0 12 -0.0 11 1 1 1 1 i 1 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I r'_ f.ul -- �'?r4�.'' Silt SFRI a � sus :iin°m4e'k Clayey Silt % wi' Silt i. L Clayey Silt —10.0 k --- Silty Clay ems=•,', Silt 4-2 4 :%,vA Sandy Silt �Y in (fv /`'Find,.'. m -15.0 • 'f f Sand '�14•ii G !, Silty Sand/Sand i ; '+i' y2y.r:'; —20.0v%` ;t Sand IF — Silty Sand/Sand --"� `%:;c.;; Silt T. s :i: :/Sand San —25.0 ;;E!!:- —30.0- Max. Depth: 26.74 (ft) SBT Soil Behavior Type (Robertson and Campanella 1988) Depth Inc.: 0.082 (ft) CON E Mill American Engineering Site: 97-502 CPT-3 BT Cone: 10 TON A 027 Location: GRADY WAY Date: 03:03:97 12:4B Qt tsf Fs tsf Rf % U ft. SBT 0 200 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 0 25 0 12 • -0.0 i I I I I I r-i-i-1�� 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ma! _ 17 `fro'j Sandy Silt ': ....: I i� i -5.0 ;',..;:,::,. !;' Sill ---- - -- --- -- ----- - --- --- - — - - -- - - -- - - ---- - - ---- -- - - ---- - f ---- Sa: y Silt -- • ^ x'`:• Silt -10.0r s`• Ps „:„. 'K,iiJ-��':'4' ,, 4- — Clayey Silt. Clay +3 Silty Sand/Sand sti . `r r,, Sand -20.0 r'Js^a; %' Sandy Silt Silty Sand/Sand -25.0- 11111: ^.j. ;<;;, Silt I -30.0 Max Depth: 26.57 (ft) SBT: Soil Behavior Type (Robertson and Campanella 1988) Depth Inc.: 0.082 (ft) 1 I x_lI 1 I I;Conetec Investigations Ltd. Client: American Engineering Corp. I SCPT-01 Shear Source 9ffset 3.36m/Seismometer.20m above tip Source: Hammer Cone:AD027 March 03, 1997 { I Last Corrected Average Depth 1 Depth Time Int. Time Int. Depth Velocity Velocity Below Below From From of from from Surface Surface Distance Vis-Cor Vis-Cor sensor Vis-Cor Vis-Cor (ft.) (m) (m) (msec) (msec) (ft.) (m/sec) (ft/sec) 3.50 ; 1.07 3.52 6.78 2107 3.94 8.13 4.26 -5.14 234.67 769.72 1 i 10.06 3.07 4.55 8.29 5.59 -8.42 178.88 586.74 13.34 4.07 5.27 8.36 6.45 -11.70 155.13 508.83 16.62 , ;5.,07 6.08 5.30 4.42 -14.98 226.36 742.47 19.90 6.07 6.93 4.13 3.61 -18.26 276.75 907.76 t ! 23.18 7.07 7.82 5.62 5.08 -21.54 197.01 646.19 25.75 17.85 8.54 4.50 4.14 -24.47 189.38 621.18 a i I I rn } 4 i 4 I , I i I ) )_, Shear Wave Velocities SCPT-1 Grady Way March 3, 1997 0 5 10 - -15 --- -- - -- -- ---- -- - • a) o _20 ------ - - — _25 -30 0 600 1200 Vs (ft./sec.) Conetec Investigations Ltd. Client: American Engineering Corp. 'SCPT-02 Shear Source Offset 6.85m/Seismometer.20m above tip Source: Hammer Cone:AD027 March 03, 1997 Last Corrected Average Depth Depth Time Int. Time Int. Depth Velocity Velocity Below Below From From of from from Surface Surface Distance Vis-Cor Vis-Cor sensor Vis-Cor Vis-Cor (ft.) (m) (m) (msec) (msec) (ft.) (m/sec) (ft/sec) r � . 4.18 127 6.97 7.46 2.27 7.22 13.19 4.16 -5.82 240.54 788.99 ? + 10.74 3:27 7.59 12.99 5.60 -9.10 178.47 585.37 14.02 4.27 8.07 12.03 6.37 -12.38 156.99 514.94 17.30 5.27 8.64 8.89 5.42 -15.66 184.35 604.67 20.58 6.27 9.29 5.89 3.98 -18.94 251.33 824.35 23.86 7.27 9.99 10.09 7.35 -22.22 136.12 446.47 26.74 8.15 10.65 8.90 6.81 -25.30 128.85 422.62 Ir 4 � 1 IL i I { 1 Shear Wave Velocities SCPT-2 Grady Way March 3, 1997 • 0 • -5 -10 ---- -__ _ _ _ � I _ r -15 a) 0 i -20 __...__--- - ---- IQ A -25 -30. I 0 600 1200 Vs (ft./sec.) • Conetec Investigations Ltd. Client: American Engineering Corp. 1 SCPT-03 Shear Source Offset 1.37m/Seismometer.20m above tip Source: Hammer Cone:AD027 ' �1 1 March 03, 1997 Last Corrected Average Depth Depth Time Int. Time Int. Depth Velocity Velocity Below Below From From of from from Surface Surface Distance Vis-Cor Vis-Cor sensor Vis-Cor Vis-Cor 5 I) (ft.) (ni); (m) (msec) (msec) (ft.) (m/sec) (ft/sec) va I 3.18 10197 1.68 6.46 11197 2.40 6.37 5.23 -4.82 191.12 626.86 9.74 2197 3.27 9.09 8.26 -8.10 121.12 397.26 13.02 13197 4.20 6.73 6.36 -11.38 157.16 515.48 16.30 14197 5.15 4.66 4.49 -14.66 222.57 730.02 19.58 15197 6.12 6.23 6.07 -17.94 164.67 540.12 22.86 16197 7.10 5.80 5.69 -21.22 175.70 576.30 1 26.74 8115 8.27 5.85 5.77 -24.80 205.03 672.51 • i I 1 y � T I _ l , I � i I i I ' II � it { I li I - Shear Wave Velocities SCPT-3 Grady Way March 3, 1997 0 5 • -10 I � I -c -15 - CD • -20 \\I! --- • - • -25 • _30 0 600 1200 Vs (ft./sec.) N GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION JAMIE PIERRE , SW GRADY WAY SITE fl AEC #9703 ) _ Appendix C Guide Specifications fl for Site Earthwork r" • I APPENDIX C 1 Guide Specifications — Site Earthwork for I SW Grady Way Site Jamie Pierre i_ Renton, Washington 1. GENERAL A. Scope of Work These specifications and applicable plans pertain to and include all site earthwork including,but not limited to,the finishing of all labor,tools,and equipment necessary for site clearing and stripping,disposal of ll, excess materials,excavation,preparation of foundation materials for receiving fill,and placement and L. compaction of fill to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans. 11 B. Performance The Contractor wan:ants all work to be performed and all materials to be furnished under this _ contract'against defects in materials or workmanship for a period of year(s)from the days of written acceptance of the entire construction work by the Owner. , Upon written notice of any defect in materials or workmanship during said_year period,the Contractor shall, at the option of the Owner,repair or replace said defect and any damage to other work caused by or resulting from such defect without cost to the Owner. This shall not limit any rights of the Owner under the"acceptance and inspection"clause of this contract. �' The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all site earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. This work shall be observed and tested by a representative of American'Engineering,hereinafter known as the Engineer. Both the Engineer and the Architect are the Owner's representatives. If the Contractor should fail to meet the technical or design requirements embodies in this document and on the applicable plans,he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by the Engineer and the Architect/En ' eer. No deviation from the specifications shall be made except upon written approval of the Geotechnical Engineer or Architect. No site earthwork shall be performed without the physical presence or approval of the Geotechnical Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Geotechnical Engineer at least twenty-four hours prior to commencement of any aspect of the site earthwork. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be the Owner's representative to observe the grading operations during the site preparation work and the placement and compaction of fills. He shall make enough visits to the site to familiarizehiniself generally with the progress and quality of the work. He shall make a sufficient number of tests and/or observations to enable him to form an opinion regarding the adequacy of the site preparation,the acceptability of the fill material,and the extent to which the compaction of the fill,as placed, lmeets the specification requirements. Any fill that does not meet the specification requirements shall be removed and/or recompacted until the requirements are satisfied. APPENDIX C In accordance with generally accepted construction practices,the Contractor shall be solely and completely responsible for working conditions at the job site,including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work.' This requirement shall apply continuously and shall not be limited to normal work hours. I , Any construction review of the Contractor's performance conducted by the Geotechnical Engineer is not intended to include review of the adequacy of the Contractor's safety measures in,on or near the construction site. Upon completion of the construction work,the Contractor shall certify that all compacted fills and foundations are in place at the correct locations,have the correct dimensions,are plumb,and have been constructed in accordance with sound construction practice. In addition,he shall certify that the materials used are of the types,quantity and quality required by the plans and specifications. C. Site and Foundation Conditions The Contractor is presumed to have visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the soil report titled"Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Proposed Les Schwab Facility",dated January 1997. The Contractor shall not be relieved of liability under the contract for any loss sustained as a result of any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from the soil report and the actual conditions encountered during the course of the work. I _ The Contractor shall,upon becoming aware of surface and/or subsurface conditions differing from those disclosed by the original soil investigation,promptly notify the Owner as to the nature and extent of the I; differing conditions,first verbally to permit verification of the conditions,and then in writing. No claim by the Contractor for any conditions differing from those anticipated in the plans and specifications and disclosed by the soil investigation will be allowed unless the Contractor has so notified the Owner,verbally and in writing,as required above,of such changed conditions. • D. Dust Control The Contractor shall assume responsibility for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or off-site borrow areas. The Contractor shall assume all liability,including court costs of co-defendant,for all claims related to dust or windblown materials attributable to his work. II. DEFINITION OF 1,TERMS 1 Structural Fill—All soil or soil-rock material placed at the site in order toraise grades or to backfill excavations,and upon which the Geotechnical Engineer has been sufficient tests and/or observations to enable him to issue a written statement that,in his opinion,the fill has been placed and compacted in accordance with the specification requirements. On-Site Material—Material obtained from the required site excavations. Import Material—Material obtained from off-site borrow areas. ASTM Specifications—The 1994 edition of the American Society for Testing and Materials Standards. I Degree of Compaction—The ratio,expressed as a percentage,of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill material to the maximum dry density of the same material as determined by ASTM Test Designation D1557-78. J i 1 i. APPENDIX C 1 I 1 , �, III. SITE PREPARATION A. Clearing and G ubbing C' , The contractor slfiall accept the site in its present condition and shall remove the area of the designated project earthwork all obstructions including and any other matter determined by the Geotec 'cal _. Engineer to be deleterioug. Such material shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be remo ed from the site. Holes resulting from the removal of underground obstructions that extend below finish gr.des - shall be cleared and backfilled with structural fill. _ 4 B. Stripping (Where vegetation exists,the site shall be stripped to a minimum depth of six to eight inches or to such greater depth as the Geotechnical Engineer in the field may consider as being advisable to remove . 1 surface vegetation and organic laden topsoil. Stripped topsoil with an organic content in excess of 3 per ent by volume shall be stockpiled for possible use in landscaped areas. p I I IV. EXCAVATI N --, All excavations shall be performed to the lines and grades and within the tolerances specified o the project grading plans. All overexcavation below the grades specified shall be backfilled at the Contracto 's expense and shall be comj acted in accordance with the specifications. The Contractor shall assume full —, responsibility for the stability of all temporary construction slopes at the site. V. SUBGRADE PREPARATION Surfaces to receive compacted fill,and those on which concrete slabs and pavements will be , constructed,shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and compacted. All ruts,hummocks,or o er uneven surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill materials. All areas which are to receive fill material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placemen of Jany fill material. _ YL GENERAL E QUIREMENTS FOR FILL MATERIAL ; ---, All fill material'mist be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. The material shall be a soil or oil- ; rock mixture which is fre from organic matter or other deleterious substances. The fill material shall no contain rocks or rock!frainents over 6 inches in greatest dimension and not more than 15 percent shall b- over 2.5 inches in greatest dimension. On-site material having an organic content of less than 3 percent oy volume is suitable for use as fill in all areas except where non-expansive import material is specified. .� All imported fill material shall be non-expansive with a plasticity index of 12 or less. , VII. PLACING AND COMPACTING FILL MATERIAL All structural fill shall be compacted by mechanical means to produce a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent as determined by ASTM Test Designation D1557-78. Field density tests shal be J performed in accordance with either ASTM Test Designation D1556-64(Sand-Cone Method)or ASTM Test Designation D2922-81 andl D3017-78 (Nuclear.Probe Method). The locations and number of field dens.ty tests shall be determined byI the Geotechnical Engineer. The results of these tests and compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which satisfactory completion of work shall be judged by the II APPENDIX C 1 Geotechnical Engineer. VIII. TRENCH BACKFILL Pipeline trenches shall lie backfilled with compacted structural fill placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches of uncompacted thickness. If on-site soils is used,the material shall be compacted by mechanical means to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. Imported sand may also be used for backfilling trenches provided it is compacted to at least 95 percent. If imported sand backfilling is used,sufficient water shall be added during the trench backfilling operations to prevent the soil from bulking during compaction. In all building pad and pavement areas,the upper 3 feet of trench backfill shall be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent for on-site soils and imported sand backfill. IX. TREATMENT AFTER COMPLETION OF EARTHWORK After the earthwork operations have been completed and the Geotechnical Engineer has finished his observation of the work,no further earthwork operations shall be performed except with the approval of and under the observation of the Geotechnical Engineer It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas during construction and until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. I , I , I " 1 II I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION JAMIE PIERRE SW GRADY WAY SITE AEC #9703 � II Appendix D Guide Specifications for Asphalt Paving S I I ` I �^ I I I � � I 1_ APPENDIX D Guide Specifications — Asphalt Paving For SW Grady Way Site Jamie Pierre Renton, Washington 1. GENERAL This portion of the work shall include all labor,materials,tools and equipment necessary for and incidental to the completion of the pavement shown on the plans and as herein specified. DEFINITION OF TERMS Pavement—Both asphalt concrete,and aggregate base materials. Subgrade—That portion of the construction on which asphalt concrete and aggregate base is to be plac Standard Specifications—Standard Specifications of Washington State Department of Transportation; January 1991. ASTM Specifications—The 1994 edition of the American Society for Testing and Materials Standards. III. MATERIALS A. Asphalt (1) Asphalt for prime coat shall be liquid asphalt,grade MC-70 conforming to the provisions of r Sections 5-04 and 9-02 of the Standard Specifications. n S catio s. (2) Asphalt for tack coat and seal coat shall be SS-lh asphalt emulsion conforming to Secti In 9- 02 of the Standard Specifications. (3) Paving asphalt to be mixed with aggregate shall be steam refined asphalt conforming to e provisions of Section 1-09.1 of the Standard Specifications for viscosity grade AR 4000W. B. Mineral Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete _ Type B Aggregate as specified in the Standard Specifications,Section 9-03.8,'A inch maximum size, medium grading. IV. CONSTRUCTION A. Existing Pavement Remove the existing asphalt concrete and base to the subgrade elevation. Existing pavements which are removed can be used as fill material provided the asphalt is broken up to meet the maximum allowable size requirements for imported fill material. I ' APPENDIX D B. Subgrade Preparation The Contractor shall pr pare the surface of the various subgrades receiving subsequent pavement courses to the lines,grades and dimensions given on the plans. Isolated unstable areas shall be stabilized by recompaction or excavation and(replacement of materials. The upper 6 inches of the subgrade soil shall be compacted to a density not less than 95 percent of that obtained in the laboratory according to Test Method ASTM D1557-78. C. Aggregate Base Aggregate base shall be spread and compacted in conformance with Standard Specifications Section 4.04. Finished aggregate base shall have the minimum depth shown and finished grade shall not vary more than 0.05 foot above or below the established grade. The aggregate base shall be compacted to a density not less than 95 percent of that obtained in the laboratory according to Test Method ASTM D1557-78. I ' D. Prime Coat Apply prime coat at an approximate total rate of 0.25 gallons per square yard to all areas receiving asphalt concrete. Conform to Section 5-04.3 of Standard Specifications. I , E. Tack Coat Apply a"tack coat"to all vertical faces,against which asphalt concrete is to be placed. Apply at a rate of from 0.02 gallon to 0.10 gallon per square yard. Conform to Section 5-04.3 of Standard Specifications. F. Seal Coat Seal coat shall be diluted with an equal amount of water and applied at the rate of 0.10 gallon of the diluted emulsion per square yard of surface. The surface shall be free of dust and loose material prior to application. G. Asphalt Concrete I i Asphalt concrete shall be spread and compacted on the prepared base in conformance with the lines, grades and dimensions shown on the drawing and as specified in Section 5-04.3 of the Standard Specifications. In addition to the compaction requirements described in Section 5-04.3 of the Standard Specifications,each layer of asphalt concrete(surface or base)shall be compacted to a density no less than 95 percent of that obtained in the laboratory according to the Laboratory Compacted Unit Weight,D1561-81a. H. Improper Workmanship Cracks,settling of surface,improper drainage and sloppy connection to previously laid surfaces will be construed as improper workmanship and will not be acceptable. ter. f ' • • I � ---Ir—r---! .H ..„ tl I i 1 . k glOY II a Z , til --------T----4 o ii .,. i.,;,<Iitlak* CI gyp;. . T �� O fe N i , -s:ti 7� ,fit, ei ,, ,s. Y . O°a • N 1 'I ,,,, .. s: ` VA �,: It: , . ...It ...0 . I . .... 4,.. : 7 \� ® \ ,10.8.\S 00�'P3"VI r. 41.4 I • . 1 1 \ \ ' Ot''\ 0 ' . \ 1 \\\\'\\\ , 1 1 0 . \ • .\\\ 8° If -1\ \ W 1 . , \\ % \\1\ • \ , li ri i° g V11 A �, . , ,,, RN ill t ' •a a da 10 `\ \ACI. \\":1\ 1 m \VI\ a� \-\\.1. t �� a t\'1___\t I al fig kg Li o \ 4. \ i \ I 66 1 , 1 ii ti: qi I. .. 6 15\\ i• ,A.\\, . g I .14. * \ I \ I , ‘ N - , \ •, — 1 , 1 1 1 ..i .1.. 1, .. ., ...,,.:„...„..,:.4 idi.,;i:_,\., , ,• 1 ,,I fa S a 01 1 • C I 0.1 � I,I �i CA \)rfik_ til H - 1. . . \ 1 til g \ . , • 4 0 . 1 , 0 . , h tii , , 11, O •.! nli .11 \ \ , II, 1 1 , • g $ American EnpInwn • Planer, • surveyor. Dole S•drlon I; co A JAMIP PIERRE—GRADY WAY Engineering nD1aai•e Wiz. sw. —�:_��, N6�--- __-_.—� 1...---- Dabbr q Corporation maw-- - - —— -- - - - --- c� GRADE AND FILL PERMIT PHONE<Z�>�,_,� Fox(200)�,-m, °-mod C.G. —� 6a7 bV ILr --t • F6•pout a Homo Chocked C.G. d1 ' 9S- 124 ,SA-N,ELP, Q (t4 ) 'I y JAMIE qERRE GRADY W• Y SITE • Grading and Fill Close-Out R 'port City of Ren ton Grading Permit B9 0552 February 6; 1998 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 A 1998 RECEIVED pre ared for: Mr. Jame Pierre 11525 Lake City'Way NE 11 Seattle, A 98125 I American Engineering Corporation Q s D Engineers • Planners • Surveyors - Memo 1 _ 1 - To: Dykeman Architects AEC Job. #9703 From: Richard J. Bieldfeld, CEG Subject: Addendum to Grading and Fill Close-out Report 1 1 Date: July 9, 1998 This memo is prepared to address site preparation requirements for the Pierre Grady Way Site a I, O akesdale Avenue SW in Renton, subsequent to theplacement of fill under Cityof Renton Gra.in q g I Permit B970552. The Grading and Fill Close-out Report(February 26, 1998) identified unresolv� ed site conditions that must be remedied during the construction process. 1. Fuel tank excavation and foundation pre-loading on Parcels D,E, and F. 11 The upper two feet of soil on all of Parcel B will require scarification and recompaction if to be used for bearing structures or paved areas. The required depth of scarification may ary due to moisture content at time of construction. Parcels D, E, and F will have to be investigated for suitable soil bearing conditions when the site plan is completed. Relev nt ,, foundation treatment will be recommended at that time. 1 2. Pre-load the one-story mini-mart building foundation. 1 Any building to be located in Parcels D, E, and F should be subject to a foundation re- investigation to determine if pre-loading is necessary. This investigation should be extended to include examination of driveway/parking areas to determine the level of compaction required in these area.. 1 1 II -- 3. Duration of foundation pre-loading? II The consolidation time required will depend on the type of soils that have been dumpe on- site and the proposed thickness of the surcharge load. A 3-foot thick surcharge may res,lt in 1 up to 3 inches to the settlement over a time span of 90 days. Site development could proceed after settlement gauges indicate stability which may occur in less than 90 days. Other design accommodations may be possible when structural design is completed. 1 1 j i 4032 148th Ave. N.E. Redmond,WA 98052 (425)881-7430 Fax(425)881-7731 Dykeman Architects AEC Job#9703 July 9,1998 Page 2 i 'i I I 4. Relationship of site preparation requirements to construction schedule.Pre-loading should be done early in the construction cycle. However, reinvestigation of the building may identifr other,options. Approximately 90 days should be allowed if full settlement is required. The surcharge could be added now if the grading permit is still active. • Addendum: A geotechnical reinvestigation is required to prepare a supplemental geotechnical report. As all deep soils data are available, we recommend that a shallow soils study be performed after the structure size, bearing loads and location are fixed) I � 9703memo.doc I I I II I � Jamie Pierre Grady Way Site Grading and Fill Close Out Report February 26, 1998 prepared for: I Jamie Pierre 11525 Lake City Way NE Seattle, WA 98125 by: American Engineering Corporation 4032 148th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 881-7430 1; (425) 881-7731 fax AEC Job #9703 - GRADING AND FILL CLOSE-OUT REPORT JAMIE PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE Table of Contents General 1 Project Description j 1 Site Description 1 Site Grading 2 Settlement Monitoring 2 Foundation Bearing Conditions 3 Conclusion 4 List of Figures: Figure 1. Grady Way Site Plan Figure 2. Final Grade Plan Appendix A. City Permit and Inspection Record Appendix B. Laboratory and Field Testing Reports AEC Job#9703 February 26, 1998 i - 111 Grading and Fill Close—Out Report General The SW Grady Way project commenced on August 21, 1997 with the initiation of fill placement and the installation of two 48—inch diameter storm drains in the drainage ditch t at it traverses the site from east to west. The filling activities continued until September 25, 19 7 at which time the site attained its design rough grade. The work on this project was performed and r the City of Renton grading license, B-970552. An estimated 15,000 cubic yards of fill was approv-d by this permit. Final inspection by the City of Renton was performed by City of Renton inspector Craig Burnell on February 25, 1998. Mr. Burnell had no comments. (See Appendix A). Project Description Project planning has changed since preliminary geotechnical studies were conducte . Original site studies were geared to construction of a multiple story structure whereas at this time o single story lightly bearing structures are being considered (Figure 1). The lighter bearing stru re will !! } considerably simplify the foundation design requirements imposed on the site. The present site configuration contains a large drainage swale contained wholly wi hin Parcel C. The rest of the site has been graded to an elevation of 18 to 20 feet above sea level. This ��. elevation is from one to two feet above the surrounding street level. Site Description The Grady Way project site has served as a utility corridor containing a railroad ri ht—of—way, electrical transmission lines and towers, a 108—inch diameter sanitary sewer, and a large dr ' ge ditc . All utilities traverse the length of the site from east to west. Original site conditions found the site with a raised railroad grade topping at elevations above 25 feet. The drainage ditch was located immediately south of the railroad grade and exhibited an invert elevation of about 10 feet. The average elevation of the southern part of the site th t paralleled Grady Way was 15 to 16 feet. A major portion of the drainage ditch was backfilled using o AEC)ob#9703 I February 26, 1998 - • 1 1, • 1 aintik , ,-\\:, , .\\\ 4\ ,,----- , , 1 \ .\._ ....-**."-'.1.J EnV." %‘k v1 �^ 9 - \1 i {;11 \, ` ....,„.4r1A;:..iiii• \\�1 Ili�yy 14 IE .../". -.----\ t" 14`1 \ (1,e..,..,,...0,fir1 1?4`I VA { '....' \.\‘,\s‘ . ivik‘ in . 4 MI n 4 k I 1 '...k. -�_1 NI , ♦\ \ �-A-,...1;:. fir• �,>: ": '_ -�{1% ? \ - _ -ti. \ ; \\ --_.:1-X-.. 10:-- L::I: Ov\\I \ 1\ k \l‘ \\ -:Irt.-- tYr .,'=.,--------= \‘\ t• .i ...."'''. 0, i , ', ;till \ ts _ t \\, I ? L��1yy { I t1\ I \,o. 1,, y \v,l`y i {„1 \ \ - 4 \ti\ 1 I � y `4� 1 \L- 4 i \cjit , i 6 1< \,\ ;ES' y „,.\\ C __. I 1 1 .li•.5g 45I \ ; 1 4 4 4 s , t1 \ 1 1, 4 { 4 1 s I 11 \ + -r i l ! F CAMMERGIAI.�DEYEI.OPMEM 1._ i 3AMIE PIERRE ram._ "-u i 1 1 I RAM'WAY -RENTON,WA T O EMAN PRELlMCdARY SfTE PLAN � ..- ..�� 1 \ GRADING AND ALL CLOSE-OUT REPORT,GRADY WAY SITE I ` 48—inch diameter culverts and covered with about four feet of fill. The railroad grade was excavated down to approximately Elevation 20. Site Grading The site was stripped and smoothed preparatory to initiation of fill application. All fill materials were controlled using the test results from two Modified Proctor Compaction tests and several nuclear density and moisture tests on placed soils (Appendix B). Compaction testing performed on in—place fill from August 21 through 26, 1997 found soils within the specification of 90 percent of maximum dry density. This period represents the fill deposited on Parcel B. More clayey soils were hauled to the site afterlAugust 26, 1997 when a second Proctor sample was obtained. On September 3, 1997, heavy rains hit the site and the imported soils ceased to meet specification because of moisture content, organic debris and inability to compact with equipment. The suspect area of poorer quality soils consits of Parcels D, E, F and the upper one to two feet of Parcel B. Settlement Monitoring Three settlement gages were installed to monitor the potential settlement resulting from the approximately 12 feet of fine sand under the site. The three gages were systematically destroyed during filling operations, were not replaced, and no measurements were obtained. Original computations indicated that from 2 to 9 inches)of settlement could be anticipated following the application of up to .6 feet of fill. The maximum anticipated settlement led to the recommendation for piers if multi-story structures are anticipated. However, single-story structures with a low unit bearing pressure should withstand the minimum anticipated settlement without damage. All settlement resulting from the fill application should be completed within 90 days of completion of the fill. The stripping of about five feet of fill from the railroad grade area of Parcel A has made this parcel available for construction without the need for concern regarding settlement. This site has been surcharged for several year and is capable of accepting bearing of a one or two story structure. AEC Job#9703 2 February 26, 1998 GRADING AND FILL CLOSE-OUT REPORT,GRADY WAY SITE Fo ndation Bearing Conditions Based on the original site conditions, fill operations and field testing results on the soils, and 1,1 weather conditions during filling, we recommend that the Parcels A through F are considered ''1 individually with regard to foundation conditions. Parcel A has been stripped of up to 5 fe t of i imported fill to establish the current final grade of 20 feet (ASL). This excavated soil is th equivalent load of a nominal three-story structure. Any light commercial structure planned on this 1 '- parcel may utilize the recommendations for a conventional continuous perimeter spreadfooting foundation. The recommended soil/foundation bearing capacity is 1000 psf. Parcel B, as currently planned, is to be used as an automobile parking area. All exce t the upper one.o two feet of fill is suitable for such use. We recommend that the upper one foot of fir is stripped back, the underlying 6 inches scarified and recompacted to 95 percent of maximum dry dens ty with the it stripped soil replaced and recompacted as well to 95 percent. A base course and asphalt may then be placed on the finished surface. Any utilities placed under the pavement must be balled and recompacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density to minimize differential settlement. Parcel C has been developed as a drainage swale and is to remain undeveloped. Parcels D, E and F are planned as the location of a mini-market with gasoline pumps. This area contains uncontrolled fill varying up to 6 feet deep. Neither the required compaction n or the anticipated settlement can be confirmed on these parcels. We recommend that when excav ting for the fuel tanks, the excess soil is placed on the footprint of the structure to provide a surcharge load. 1 1 i I Two settlement gages should be installed prior to loading. Upon completion of the tank in tallation or cessation of settlement, the surcharge may be removed and the foundation area excavated. We I recommend an over excavation of 2 feet, scarification, compaction and backfill to the level of the floor slab base course. Compaction should attain 95 percent of maximum dry density. 1 In order to minimize the effects of differential settlement, the floor slab should be reinforced using#4 rebar at a minimum of 18—inch centers. A structural engineer should design the slab and perimeter footings. AEC Job#9703 3 Feb 26, 1998 GRADING AND FILL CLOSE-OUT REPORT,GRADY WAY SITE Conclusion The fill and grading operations for the SW Grady Way project were successful in preparing the Parcels A and B for development. The fill and excavation of these two parcels have been documented. Parcel C development has been completed with the installation of two 48—inch diameter storm drains and the gabion—lined drainage swale. Parcels D, E and F were less successfully developed. Observation of future excavations during construction is necessary to confirm satisfactory site conditions. We have included recommendations regarding additional site development work. The development of the project using single—story structures minimizes the magnitude of anticipated settlement. Also, the location of the larger structure on Parcel A precludes significant settlement. We recommend that'all foundation excavations be examined by a geotechnical engineer to confirm satisfactory conditions prior to pouring of concrete. It is our opinion that the 'site is suitable and ready for development provided the recommendations of the Geoteclinical Report and this Fill Close Out Report are followed. r 1 AEC Job#9703 4 February 26, 1998 II 1 Appendix A City Permit and Inspection Record • J' I� z ' • , 4 ortt CITY OF RENTON • Griling License HI III 11 Permit Number 3970552 1 , , H Permission is hereby given to do the following described work, I 1 according to the conditions hereon and according to the approved li plans and specifications pertaining thereto, subject to compliance 11 with the Ordinances of the City of Renton. II III Nature of Work - , . ...... . ...•.- 11, I ! Annual Grading License H1 hi l[Job Address I. 1110 SW GRADY WY I ' 1 . - 1 11 \ . Owner PIERRE JAMIE 11 III1 111525 LAKE CITY WY NE SEATTLE WA :. . Tenant • 11 lh 11 Contractor 11 '1 J & K EARTHWORKS INC Contractor's License JKEARI*1 3M8 1 : 1 - 4362 JIM SMITH RD Contractor's Phone (509) 66216017 I i. W2NATCHEE, WA City License 10860 l' 98801 Other.I.ti formation: , ... , ....::. . ..*::::::',.. . ...: :-.!::::!:::..:-..:::.:-...::... -...".::;:!:11.::.. ,:.;:. .:...:::::;:y.i. ..:-:::.:.:.!..:•:•.•.::i,...... :..'f.' .: : . . . Date of Issue 08/18/1997 Cubic Yards 15001 Ili 11: ,---. Date of Expiration 08/18/1998 1 , 1 , Construction Value 175, 000 .00 . 1,Parcel Number 242304-9110 li I 11! Renton Job No H' A g Zonin i - -*.'•:.:! :'''' .:1:;-*'?.-:.. .'!:;:•'*'.::*:•:::16i','I'iiiggE2190.e,,';': ::'N.i:'1'ii;''i:1::.-i::?:.:%:..'''';'.':.:''..i..::':::: :i: i.:::!;'i:::'!..,.'.-.-'::;.%.:. -. .....- * : • • .. •. 1'I THIS LICENSE IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE ISSUED ) Expiration Date 08/18/1998 11 I hereby certify that no work is to be done except Subject to compliance with the Ordinances of the as desciLibed above and in approved plans, and that City of Renton and information filed h ith this all work is to conform to Renton codes and permit is granted- ordinances. 1-\A - - 1,..1,) Applicant X 4kft Building Official 7 1 i I $200() 17ILL BE CHARGED FOR COPIES OF LOST OR DAMAeili). PERMIT BD321 1 d 10/93 drt r; _..- . ... ____ ____________.... .. --_._—______ • _ _ ____________________.. ________._________ 1 206-277-4455 RENTON DEV SVCS/FLAN 286 -'b1 FEb 25 'y8 14:1y CITY OF RENTON. Inspection Record - I 1 Permit Ntunber S 9 70 5 5 2 I. 7A HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS Call by 3:00 pm for inspections the following day-Phone(ZU6} 235-2542 Call before work is concealed or pouring concrete Do not pour concrete until approved Do not cover until approved Do not occupy until final inspection is complete Mature of Work • Annual Grading License Job Address 1110 SW GRADY WY ' Owner PIERRE JAMIE Contractor J & K EARTHWORKS INC (509) 662-6017 Inspection "'17ate; Dissp is CoU tints Final CS . • • I • I ' 8D3202d 10/93 ar Post this record at job site at all times • 4i 1 E0 3910d 9NI633NIVN3 Nt1CI3WV tELLt885Zb 9E:Zt 866t/5Z/ZO 1 I i ' III Appendix B Laboratory and Field Testing Reports Pierre—Grady Way Site { I i MOISTURE-DESNITY RELATIONSHIP TEST , . Curve No. : 367 Project No. : 97-358 Date: 8-15-1997 III III Project : JAMIE PIERRE - RENTON II Location: IMPORT MATERIAL . ; - SAMPLE 1 Elev/Depth : NA Remarks : _- TESTED AND CALCULATED BY K. ANTHONY I MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description : 'BROWN, MOIST FINE SILT WITH SAND & GRAVEL ' Classifications: USCS: NA AASHTO: NA 1 i ` I Nat . Moist . = NA% Sp.G. = 1 Liquid Limit = NA Plasticity Index = NA %> 3/4 in = 7.46% ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED ill Maximum dry density = 141 .5 pcf 139.9 pcf Optimum moisture = 6.0 % 6.5 % I 140 ' -- Test specification : 1 111\ ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C. Modifie , Oversize correction applied to eac point 130 • 120 100% SATURATION CUIVES ' FOR SPEC. GRAY. EQUAL TO: 2.8 2.7 a 1 10 �1 14111- ! 14,4%44444i c 100 _ ' %>.2 , 44444 '1 . 90 '141144% ,. v 0 8Q 70 - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 • Water content , - Plate Na____ I ^' A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. MOISTURE-DESNITY RELATIONSHIP TEST Curve No. : 415 Project No. : 97-358 Date: 8-28-1997 Project : JAMIE PIERRE : • Location: IMPORT MATERIAL - SAMPLE 2 Elev/Depth: NA Remarks: I TESTED & CALCULATED IBY G KENT - REVIEWED BY S YAGHMAIE j MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description : OLIVE BROWN_ COARSE SAND W/CLAY CLUMPS & GRAVEL i Classifications: IJSCS: NA AASHTO: NA Nat . Moist . = NA% Sp.G. = Liquid Limit = NA Plasticity Index = NA %> 3/4 in = 7.9% , ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED ' - Maximum dry density = 130.8 pcf 128.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 9.0 % 9.8 % I . 140 Test specification : ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C. Modified Oversize correction applied to each point 130 .; \N144416L 120 100% SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC. GRAY. EQUAL TO: 2.8 2.7 "' ` 2.6 I ::0 114011114141 _ 80 ' ' %%%4 . . _ I 70 0 5 10i 15 20 25 30 35 40 Water content , % Plate Nn A.A.R. Testing Laboratory , Inc. ........... n�L �yw..p�[ .. ... ...:::A.::1 u.}'/.:}t}•::::ii::::: :e:::i .'}::...t.. .,§,}...A:i+h }.v r:.-.rr'y.t4.... ••:i :':F:;:„. \..r..:::::::.?r ... v. •.r. :. :.:r: :}::xrr.{,•n?}:.-::::nA :•yr?:}`.6'jin''-'>.i^C'{Ji?-.•Y+.nx. �V::..{;hJ:yt:^/r/�.:•l�/ ��q `• •+� ��:•.�:;.}:':i':{.::.......... eisitliiiiiiigtfiiii ' ... :•,::Jy-,, .' ... .. , .. •. ,.::{?J??px:j..y:r:).{,.;i;;..•^y.•nn..:•n}v)n�:G:i'.r-n.�.}.0?A\�<?FC'..��•}L*�t•C.n:n}SS�/M:;(1:s7:ISW.r}'Y:4;M%:•Cy,-�4,r}.y.,}!ri�•Y::nn:• ... • f•}:::•:::: F:• 1��I�F/..<....�\,,: ::n{..:{}r•rfnverim}�{i?}}n�).}M^>}tii::±•:.gin•:::::. :4•:.�.... t-........... .. .. .., • A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC. ' g:0 w+ ?.e•-.*:': N4? Jamie Plerre Pro r��� 3 Phone: 881- 158 5812 : j�f?<?`:`•: P.O.BOX 2523 (206) :'',.a }::§m§: } ?1110 SW Grady W I REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX (206)881-5441 •±•):. ��1{rf.:},,v� s Renton ..: •:.�. l::i:�v Y::;. %':?American Engineering Corp. ll°,- #s > gi::: :8970552 AVICS.•:z.AACheryl Girard P,E. .: . c:,c:m AI .... :;•fi r: OOM''Sheer Transport/BRC $4032148th Ave NE , :: ?' :%>i::rr:2�ti�i.-:.x{. �'Jk.,:?ti i{}�:?•.`'✓--Jf:•:{h}}r• I :' ti•}:}i\tiijl ���y^yZ::riF::xr�vvr+.,r{:�'iiii�'f i�t$•�ri:+;`i:};•mi':> :vM'::i->:•S.,C'•:.flj}0 '.,'�):W�-)'..�.:::•5:::): :.• ::L*:..-xiiii;•i3'••}})i: v•}''li}v f..}+•.'•'}.ii::y`.: Redmond,WA 98052 •::: :i}4}}}f;i}k,++;i., f rr:±i a-:::?<:;jii}:i�. ::)`F%.?±{ :�` :a ::`'o:':i^i4;?" �'aai}{ i<45'if:':;vi2 , ..............................:::::::.:......................:•::::.)....r........,......, .....:.. .::•:�:n•: f::v.;n•,.:::.`.)c:<>:>ii::S;::G;E�`iti:'::i::�<:%i%.::.�.v... - •.. n..........v.:•n•:::•J':::::::::-:.�:•::::•:::.5::•:•}}:�:•}:•i}}}ii}'•}yip};n;{�?.i:{±\:i:i):;:}j}:)�:i:: � �yt ........................... ...,,..•:..-.:::.. .., ......,...•.n.-:}:::................::.o::}•:?„i...:.,....r, .t,. � t:��4V'::�: � tee:c�:;:......................... i ........Mk.::::w.{::\.rrr....x:::•.,r r..,.v•::........ 4.;f;:u....,..........:..v.•f.}) 3• .... .. � II, :'^•::•iiti?it::±;1:;,{}.n?C:::ii)�:::::•i:'i'•i•}:)}:{:�)):?3:i:}':::}}:?• :n: : ::::.:::.- :. Report Date: 8/21/97 Inspector. J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M. Jeong Air Temperature: >;:)}•.•:::::::�:.::::::::::::{{:::::.......:........,.:.n....::::::.............................;..:::•:::(:CIS Lti01�".?`$1'g....::..:::-:.:.::...,.:,:.:..,.. .... ..... .. ..:. . ... ::;«•;:.:{:;i:?<Sr:S:i?'••r.•:}:•?i,;.;.,;±.•,;.:{{{{:a}::};±.;x:..±}:;:;},x:i::•rii>;•':;?7}iiii,'•iS;>::}:::.:...:..:.: ........::.::.... I . 2 visits to site, 08:00 &19:00 hours, did not meet with contractor. 08:OOAM visit checked densities frori, nights i placement in parcel B, East half. 90% compction obtained. • 1 , ,---- II dl , , ' I i , 11 II 11. ' ``{' AU.REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF :.,...... _s:{:;'_'��'":..::::::......... .:..:.. :::• - ::.:?.; INC. REPRODUCTION `r' .,. ;'K`''"�`}'' ':``<:"{:sk ' 'V THE CLIENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, �;� ..K�. f s.,•)..•:3;;}::::i::i'ti:i.4::*•' :;2\;>n.};:.:,.,;��;iC:?ij`\c'"`y.,4fQ�`ni?y F:•4 S: ?:` ,`.sA47, <? �"�' �, . . 1\% EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING :\ro,i•' • ,:\X ,*`?^ ���` C ?k '' �'''' •. LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. • v::<'i{'tt::•+ :?.:t•}}yt:;};;�:.c:;{;:r•NnL�aq�y.ca l„:. tr. :.... .:.•},:•/.:•. ( liiGi :` :,i,.+'.\R. Yi ..: rr}:'ri<rSi::•}':.•. n.. }. $v�t�i+.' W.' �l. 4'Lv .:±Y+:.;v•rt vfra <. .., ;.:..:.�-:..%c:r'r'.L':::y•}..}•: .;::y:ct;::",F:•tt:>�� r}? .,fq, �<: �::":��::t%,.y�, .4�.- ..>✓ ...f !�:��'s ................:.......:.... #�:.; ,�....�.. ::r>.:•: `fr'1. f?L?:•:,9': y ti3.t}:a)••}::t;riyie:I;if�•r.• .•+:?.. ,,p'• -. :r{;g,.....,.k:Nh}:z:??Ln:•.....:i.::?-....fry:.,...,„.:•:::.—....: ................. Iv r}::::::::::::':'vi•:. ...};.;.:.:.. ,.•n;if}{:v.:;{LC:::.Jh^�-{LY.}}y};.,..vr.:.nn .nV...++.-� { {,•... A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC! .;v:.• ;IO`: "fi-% s7-3� i+`{::'r ?} Jamie Pierre Property #q'l��j P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206y 881-5812 �:te :1:::% 881-5441 : g 1110 SW Grady Way REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX= (206) .:....:. £}y::;�•r.`!:;,�:: `>>'"^?American Engineering Corp. :v< t::: 8970552 mr • �: MI Girard P.E. ' h{.•. - h,. '` ' �yJ.r.•AkSheer Transport/BRC .: . ':'a4032148th Ave NE ; z�r <.s fLL>,:<r '..•Redmond,WA 98052 -•.}� :..:,;:}y?}::zs-:x <; }•'}tttr}}Y?•i}}!t^'•};{•;{:.�•.;i:tL:.,••::.y.,v.;:::::.;{:••-:::::::vy i ,v N,v f LS rvi:::?L?.::::: :::.:::::i::.:::n•i...... ..f.. .?.v-..::rf.}}}}}{}iS:J�.}:r•::?:•}:•::::h:^:•f:::{•}:i:i:it:{:.�.;r}.::•:::•.�:.F•.!�.` ii:v::•.v•i:vkli.::..n ..................:.......:........... Report Date: 8/22/97 Inspector. J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong Air Temperature: w::::::w:::v::••L.}:t4:•}}:vv::::::::::..:v::::::•:•}}}'•yyfA::::•h^r:^::•r w•}}5i:•:L:::•:.�.w:.+•: p�'iy� y�e�:t{4:t3:i:.isG}::^:}i:{•i}:?•}}:t{tv::•.::n:{4::.�::i:;:yi:::{.}':mn.:v•%•.r;<v�}}:{•:v}::{•i•}::}r::::':':.i •}:•U}::t•:•hv:}.�:........v..v:.vw:.w:::::v.�:.�:.�. .:.F............. •x::::::::fw:{•:::::..Ey ��. .... -. .... .. .... :..... .v................Lt<:j:`::i•w:.: ?ii : %ii}:•:•�:•:•�.w::::w:n...,?r.:..:•rv:::::::::•: .n ...^......................................................... :::{:t{ji•;i}:•};}i}}}?.X?n•::?}.?Y.ni}i}•.}}y:p}�•.i??}:i•{�•::•::-:::{•:::::,..�:n?}:}:..::::•w::•••':::::: ....::....:� ... ........ Site visit at 9:00PM, contractor is not on site, but material is being stockpiled. Material is consistent with original sample obtained on 8/18/97. Contractor is working between 8:00PM and 5:00AM. , i, i - • I :„. .:• •:•:^;;;:,: ,., ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ,"ay.i:}- :. tL„t, ...,.'...,iv3ck\\ ''~v`.v• RO ck ++k�Cy 2w;`•S�.•`:'av i.ti aS ::as.0:.t�<;}114,1.4 4NI THE CUENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY;INC. REPRODUCTION .'. V ' ' EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING . t} :•:::: \7§ K "y k< LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. 1 I ... .. ... ..,.. .. � :::::::.................:"-.{+• :{4:n`:•Y•:}:<;F.:h;Y.:u i:::i ti iT14YT"+}..} :F.:.. ���� vrF;:}}i}:in;{•^:::\:}:.4 .•1:•:•: !`t{OCrJ. ':n•.}'44�:•:4`.i•n n3. :PI.eetta :1!? ' .. •': .�... �:•. :�4::..r...•r:}:{::F::...;.,. :::::::{}}• •;5,•a}L`�.,F•} %`3`.bs.,v snn.?c:r:Io3.:::?..r.Y.. '.'•':^•f:�I . :4 : .: ...:�w:w F f.. : iv:YY nR• vvi•...i�k�;��+r2', ...........:: .{i::n.......:........................ :G •�\'-. �.• rr:: FiJf.4l.:;}iN}...:tKIX{+�T} f..4 }� Yk��......... :.. .. �� ...✓':.:{tr ��.:^}.<'.: .rF♦ }+`v':i::::!:{}:•if•:ftVk6,?}��..,.:.•:}:::?,.�i�1C::/.•.14:/.,F.,?G.}ii;;;•}:{:rti•,i}ii::ny. �.. . ..�,�,.;�v3�'r9T�68 A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC. :r(p; .:a� ` � w '" Jamie Pierre Property G� 'j P.O.BOX 2523 Pfione:(208}881-5812 IO` ' 1 € :::..}.>`:},,.•,: 31110 SW Grady Way REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 >,�f..;,;,�: 1 4. # ::4,4,�Renton i:,:;..:American Engineenng Corp. dt:.4r;s .:...�.,••:.•1},y<?ki.:: 9 g :v'S,ty. fSMY:.,.4iSY.'v/;C ......:::::::.:.::.>: IE ^''i 6970552 !(< ?<: ii Cheryl Girard P.E. :<:::: .:wK;}<^�:Ai ::: ,s;.:.,••. .}> .401 t:*40E f::-Sheer Transport/BRC S 4032148th Ave NE : ::r <# . - s'i l..: :k;:••..:{{{.. :rti:"::'6,•',,t;,?:`....:::•F-S.urF�'Y h :4S'it'd{y w `•`:Redmond,WA 98052 ;� w" ::: ' tnY.ivS.A n:vb:}tih :�S ........................:::.:n::::::n::::::: .v w:.:.:.}}}}}}tii}:^}}?i}:v}}}}}}}}:,'. :':::-:..n:-., •.:•:•. v�:-.:-. .. ........t.v... ..:.........::::.w.::n:•}:.is}'•::•}^}:tin..}Yn.::ti^:v:}:}:•:}}}}:}i}'y..�::-.:::..-.-'.:. ......... .:....... ...... .}:,:..v::::.v:•v'.}:v:rr is}:;::.}:4};':•:::v}n'•:4;:i.yvi;:?•: .:}ii::::i:;{:jji{.:,}iG:!;::r i:::�:Y:i;- .:.. ...:::nw...:.............nw:::;:.r.,.. }.}:5�:•::i}::;!:::•}:{-}`:S•}ri:v:4i•'i'•:}:•:yy ::� v.r/ S•r. 'p�'�c� :t?iiit{`vi:JSi:}i}'ri}i::}:O:•}i?i::,v:::.::::n}'::v:?v:nv::v{:n........:.:.v:::,:}..v.v::::.nv: ..n\:n....:nvw::::::.......:::r::.w r.•..,.. ...f.•:::::w::F.::::.:.::•.5�:-.F.• :7i�1:�7�1��1•h7 .!!.�1.:v::::n•.v::n.:n:v: ::.:: •:n.: nvn.::::.v..n..................... ............. Report Date: 8/23/97::: :Inspector J. Landsrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong Air Temperature: I .. ......:................ ..........n....... ..... �Lli. ::::•.?{:v:•;:{4:::{:.;+.;::.}::•..:.}:v:::::::::r,•{:::.:v:v:r•.�::•:{:.::::n,}}+}}i}ii::i)•}}} i:iC Site visit at 10:00PM. Talked to grade hop about placement. 15 trucks hauling tonight. Good material. Contractor is placing on West half of parcel B. East half compactions from 8/22 placement are above 90%. Contractor is obtaining 90%with 2 passes of vibratory roller. II 1 II I I. C ..:�:.::�::.:.::..:.:::.�..;.:r... - - •--'- • ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF _ ii:;;: ' iw:1'}`p`'•`;a:;c:4.}j`��;fv',;'>},;•:' TESTINGLABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION��` !;.•�''•:�.y.:��`''` , •{}`.•:,..:Y• c THE CLIENT AND AAR. LA � ���.; •,1c,•}::w.t:*: :�. ..tea ;,: ,:} '.:{ tk 4,'}4�<`{ t:<w- a .: \, :' 41: M':`� t EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF AA.R.TESTING ;;;,.; :e,,,A '%." % :: ;{zr:::.,...`��{w LABORATORY INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. � t `'.w`W1{4WWh� A`�', `, -Fj),.A K • 1I :...a�r•.p`v.`.KSM:}:}}iiti<_�� wn{t4{•.x?•:.,..s.�..,,`,:,ss, :,'.:{••.: ---: 7.7...;:i:.osteatimen.‘„opmenomporsonstuakem ,- • A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC. jabitamogig 97-358 P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206)881-5812 i..7.17*.spriamie Pierre ProPertY CI10 3 REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX (206)881-5441 4tittiiitile#WM1110 SW Grady Way clik.:•:OVA Renton kw"— American Engineering Corp Atri*O.i0aCheryi Girard P.E. .:Pettriittiteirbeig B970552 aliregaVg4032 148th Ave NE . ...NN.WAEM% • '41004010.0.:0.::•*Sheer Transport/BRC Sefif migViqui?Vgi / ? ,Redmond gtedmond,WA 98052 aklann, MageinERNMEMINgigii'MEN:EMENTIMit010400.00011:WgiiMMIMEMENNEMEMEMEN: _ Report Date: 8/26/97 j Inspector J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 ; Reviewer M. Jeong Air Temperature: MiNegnimmumagammoimumaiminSOCtRitiiPeffiiiiiiiidari;iiiiiiiNERMONORENNIMPROSPOI Contactor is bringing up to grade the West half of parcel B. Stockpile on East half has destroyed Easterly settlement plate.The 2 remaining plates on parcel B are still being filled over(to grade by 8/27 night). , pitifit#W4 ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ti:AFT•r ..5.egr :::MMIWA'aiiMOVA*VA THE CUENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION WitsareWOMIVV*44:tfti:014:402%tala':•ii EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF AAR.TESTING WA,,,...4.ft:VIDLAM: LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. P&W.FRAVV,,AV6AVRAWKAiM:: . ::::.:r:::v:::::::::::: }:vw:}:::::::.v:::::::::::.v:•.v::•.w:::ny.}.}•.':r4;.},}v+:}}':{:::::.4.F::w:::.. .. .. ,.,.:..�... {{•:{.:•}•?.}::ri. .}•.}ti}}:'?.}:::-!;:{;?i!+v r.:.+-i+}}4.,+ r i0?ipK:j ;>'/.;:•:j-lr: ;•;y;: K IIE1JD'REROrn , }':?ii'l i'f d...:+}Fi «\v...h.:h:•}::::}} ::�,.?i}' ....}.:. ' 1'�F ( ...rr .. ?�;::�nj i>:•:}:;r.}:i;'S?ii'f::}}::«... r.::... r.?riivr:t .r..4vrt.r4i'r?•}i:•:^i.�}::.:.:..v}:!4.Y4}vS>'C}}:?-Y.;F.$?:.::M.Gd';^.......Y.}.�.:Rf{:•»..:::::�'hx:/.<?}n.:..../ / rho. r......v.::::..:........ ........................... A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC. o-< y 't97-368 " P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206)881-5812 `::•''>.W. 'Jamie Pierre Property ��O 2 I REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 Addre :: {1110 SW Grady Way I Clfjt :>A3: ;-<';Renton ;:;:::.:;::':American Engineering ..t.. :+ ...:. Ix:.}}}s >}.:<:> Fenn N A 8970552 I I I 14`F°#1i `<> 'Cheryl Girard P.E. .<:.;^>::.,a:; <»:x I I sowR:•z;;`.,,?.:; ;: 'olE0 :?? Sheer Transport/BRC $gzs4032148th Ave NE :::<:•}';!:: }};;<:>?:i.;i.: I I 1 :}}p,;{r.;4.y?.?;h}:;:/:• }}i~.�•'i?F,:vl+i'?>Y ;4r:::.•:/ri'•Redmond WA 98052 « ::^.>.}:::<>.?.}}}i..: :::: v.:{F.!yiiii:V:is •::•};r � .. .....: I .:...:.:..:::::•v:w:...••vh•:.v:::::::w:..::n., vr..}}'n}y:n},v,.w..,•:..{!..>:4}:+'ri^iii ���?y�1 I I!..J.•x :./...:.{{? Q.T.M. .:............. ....... }: v::w::...n......n.................... .. .. . ... ... ;w:::??:•::•::::::+:•:n•:::h}:::::::::v�nw::w:;:::::::::•.�::::.:v:::::::w:.v:::: 1i� Report Date: 8/27/97 , Inspector: J. Landstrom Job Time: I i .....Reviewer: ?{.>5:•(.: :}Air..T:rmp:.::::atur :i?::::}is i>:::.»::i>}r>}::}::.i::{.} I Date Mailed: 10/10/97 R M. Jeon Air Temperature: I I�I stir<::r:<>::>::>::>:;:.>:::>:::::<:::;<:»::::>::>::::::><:>:<:-�:>:::::: } :::::<`:>:::`:>�: :<:<::<::;::«;:»>::::::<:<:<::::<:::: West 1/2 of parcel B is to grade, contractor is concentratingon Easters half. Densities of West half age above I I 1 90%. Truck-traffic is still beingrouted byWest 2 settlement plates. No monitoring will b in until truck7ng is finished. 11 I, 1 li I I il • I!I I , - Ij i ,11 li . I I 1 I • `•:;:�. :::::::...::..:....::.;.:...:::.::.•:.,:.}::•:•:--•.::.:..::...........:..::.�:.:..., ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIALANDRRETHE PROPERTY OF III P:x I !`i.'k'.'kkk'kk'iN '` '''k'``s > w THE CLIENT AND A A R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUC�ON ::x• :t :,1q^fie9�:>:+:D^::i�'::?!.ttti�\4•:xt•,�n)'avRN..:..��.}.w.,ttiS:�r,{pad{ '.,,.::t•:,•1;*;, ; � �� �;� . tm:°?°' EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING I \•:i}.;•I•}t:> �. '�"2�36ei .��:.rt:;., �•.•'b:,. v} Et?fi.:;. ... `fit �`r'''' .• :X1.1 LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. I 11 eRatieNtinibialtdeat ii}f u..?? '�?.r::`.•}:n. ?+ {.}::::<'.•'"i'O :y+}v}'•r�{•.�'�?Iv:' '•xti;>+L:• ',: v..?�. t• .,•: .............. 'FIELD uq } 'A}'r.•isis!?!:?!•.v:•. :•}v,:••,'/,:.•..:0�.:2v:i::x•.v :.....n••v:•:::::•� i.....v..n..•,;xvr{.::r v:O:i;i:.�:, ..},'. 0.1xf.+v'?o.:{::?::nv::+:;•v::?u.;?.;r:{. x::::.v:v.v:.... A.A.RLABORATORY INC. ' '':": TESTING I z�"��:�:•" 97-358 { t ; ie Pi P P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(208)881-5812 Jam erreroperty 7 3 h`�� w::a�`:s 881-5441 ' :�M&.: 1110 SW Grady Way REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX ( : < Wk1..:+ eg'Y 'y#Renton >•:<s> zAmerican ineerin Corp. s rat.trlifr2 B970552 *rsF>.;: :4iCheryl Girard P.E. '.:4:::%:..xr..;r<:•/c :}:;:;>::z<i `>• } On 491 '''�r�.`'Sheer Transport I BRC • S .''4032148th Ave NE "" >:Redmond,WA 98052 ar...0 , v.v:v::.v::::::::::?::::.•ii} ::::•}}}:•i}i4}}}isti{:::::::::::::::::::::::.} :::.:::::� ::•;•:•:-::.:....:. .....v... m::v'::.}•;v}• �y,� ?:i\i:iryi`:'i:iiii:;i:y;:j;:r ii:! ir ..n................... ...... ..n•.v:x:::m-w:::::::::.:::•.vx;+:::: .... .v.,.,.;+{'u:3:�iii:•:.r v.::.?•Av4:ii}ii>Y:::::::..:n• ..v:.:........v..:.:n,.{}$.n:..r...................n.. .........n...... r........:...... yy. .v:v:.v :.w:::•m::.•..: v......?{:::n.�.}:tivnw::.rx:::ry••:::: .: ...vr...... ..v................: ....;•••:::::•......... v' ....}... ........ ...........v.... :. ........... •il?}}:{.<;:;:i:?:>i�}:i�:}}:•}:•}}}:-4}:• :??:}:?{{t:;i:}:i::){ii-i'ij:?i•}i .vti:Li:{?;} :;:?;:y;:::::;}>}:j}:�ti2�::<;kti:::jti�:i'ri•}£ +:?•ii:{{.ir.:{?{.{}}}:�:•}:{v:!.: ?: �^•if�.:F.:.......................: :...... .:............ .. Report Date: 9/2/97 Inspector. J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong Air Temperature: x4'?.:w..r... ? ...................... .......v.....n............................,. ... ..�J��.}}:!•}:v.:..n..:}i}>:v::}Y.{v+^r:•i.ti;{-i}iY.:{.}:Q::Yvry::^}'4i:?{.}}}i}:{}•}}}}:J}:.Li:•i::?-.iIX::^i:i^ii: ..n.•v:•::•:::::v:::x>::::.ww:.v;::•::;�..r•.:........r........:..:::v::w::::}:::::•:A:}::::nv.Ilns ����Qi:i:,Kii11�..........: :;.}7.::.:::: .;{u:f..v :..:.y..> : ::v: : ..: :vv:..: • ..w:n:. 4nv:}::::...x.vb}}?w:::v:}::::.O.n.v.>.:::•.v:nv:u::....:....................................:.. :... .:.:........ 2 visits to site, 8:00AM &7:30PM.Westerly settlement plate in parcel B destroyed. Only center plate remains. Contractor is stockpiling in middle of parcel. No one on site at 7:30PM,will return on 9/3/97 to talk to contracator. • • � I � �'`'`•""''"''`'''`''``' + ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ?'; y yy *+;••• a:}i: •,?•}:;?zN }{'w:.:::• `' REPRODUCTION •.,t'-:.\{C.li�,''' IVtIR1f 3\•v\\��,}i$Lu v��.i-i�Fimvvv.4.?x'v? fi� �� ' w��xr��;£wy THE CUEIVTAND AAR.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. " .� :'```^:srr i .?`•h`: `• •M EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING ��� ��` 4,:;w" t�� { LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. ' . .Q.H : 9 . i ; . ,oC y yO s; :\ j l t : r. Sk.,: s:< u „ ; Y } � YX+ f ? Ylfiiv �. ? x {,,,.,,..r. . ...r ............,:.;:cco:c::<.::•{•:... I A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY,INC. • -y"`}' ' :: ::: ;'%r::; �:Jamie Pierre Property O3 i P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206)881-5812 ,y,• G�i4-crl REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 Add tY�::'> 11110 SW Grady Way �" Renton ;j t %: slAmerican Engineering Corp. f:�ii <>:i::i :`s:<.:::r 18970552 ::.};}>_?:'Cheryl Girard P.E. ::::: :A?:>m:::s«::r: ik'"l`Ltl'iin`^�: [x�=!F' Sheer Transport/BRC S 4032148th Ave NEc sti:<ss::„4:.:;!:•;:s:{ ?i:is{:i'%•f4Gi}i}:' v{w•iYuit:}'��iW;:M{,• ;..ri:;n±i i. :,C}:}::;�'•'L:,t ilil v:t1i}r ii} . 'i{<{:'j:4::y?i\;} tijf? �..it?' %;1,.:}Yip:}.:1: s -:;•:•;:r•.:i}}}:}:t•:t/ Redmond,WA 98052 :;ys:>'::{u:'}r< rf>}y. ::i :?ttv}4: r}....? .... ...............•.::::::nyvi:Oi}}i}}YJ:L}i}:^}}}:•{::?':itii'.:ii+:i}:ri:{:iii:S{C::iii:?iii:w:n::::'.;:v{{:i:X:.}}}}i::•$$iY':ti� ...... ..{r............r.... .....: .. .:.....:....a.....,......t.... :::ry,:::::::::••;:.::t}:;:vy..`:{;r{}}}i}}:::.v::n.'.:...':.>..:::i'ir.:v::?.:. .r} ...........:::•::f.^ithv}:{{?^i:•:::::::::is}'t}::v w::::.:::::v::m:: •:}::.......... IirS •t•.! ................................. :::•et..or ..a.... .::::::/3/9....:.::.::.::::::.::.:::::::::.::. Air Temeerature: ................:..:...:.:...:. Report Date: 9/3/97 Inspector: J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong Temperature: -.. ..............:.. ............. 4v.A'::..{?vi}:}::4:•}i}i�rii:::.}'ii}':::::•}iry.,,v}}}}:tij -_- ::iiis�i}}is:iY.i}ii:•Y.d}}:{•vtv!i'i:'v:t•iiiiiii'i:i:viii:!:::;ii:4i ............... w:}:t{ih:•:v:{?{{:;.}}it,}:Lei}ish%:}v:iiiisSii%ii`:S}}:{{•;?•}:4i}i:'i'vvji}yr„r:l l: }$}:i�i?>}::ii' .. t {i;{::+::m:.}.{..v::...:::::b:w:n. .. ... ... ... ... ..,<}......:::.t.:::}.�:r:,:.:::..�::.:..........:::.�:::.::::.:::::::: Ins . cifan: airmed,.::i:::>::>:�::}::>}>:{>:::<::};,s.:;:.ii::- ... Talked with grade hop about replacing settlement plates. Need to call job super- Fred on 9/4/97. Material being 1 delivered has changed slightly. More clay and silt and higher moisture. New sample taken. I -II I I'. 11 1 1 1 II' • 1 t 1 . 1 I 1 • :a,Tw1 '"' ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ```'"''`{§":1: '''''ioi::Wis.V''"' LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION'`` v?`:`;>+i4� Y \? 4 THE CLIENT AND A.A.R.AR.TESTING LA TI , } :`:'`;'':s?W '' a*`t?t}�w���"s. t t. i t EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING ' 'S, ;Nt..' '% ` 4 `\"t`"' LABORATORY INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.T. t v ' �i:G�ia1'��..\4 � � tii�{�>•\tick ��1t't`+t�\ 1 . -• �iiG /i: .v?{j•--.ri r. ...�..;.fs ::.\,hr:;}. •q:2{}\9{.}... ..f,...n rn. t- p 4'•��,�.-'� -.' :. �:'• }. :: { }S}''i:'?'Y. ,;; v ...}.i ...... .. .. v.� :rf-<' ;:•:;}?j{??:^iii::-:?>ar`.;;::w::.: :.}}•vi.:rr/:ir.::::nj.RR .``.��.p.LL(( 6•::\{.,{ {ryyv:n•..n• r:i, I,I,I,.v I IYM�IMFIG: wi :�� '�'•�I� �:In ..::.•v.r:.::•w:.. .../.i:•i:{{a}i:.�aiiv-:r:A\;:v.'i::?iiiff:ti^i}:•}::iFAE::n?},?}}}ynOK:n:�ikj;r:::::}.{.,i':ai:?n}..r........................................ I'{:vi.i}is0}}}C{}f.Ui}x•ni}i}:Oi}:{{-}%.}SS}}.'??rr.•}:•is?•:tip:^ii:a:{i.:{{a^n:}}1....}n n.-:}.:¢}::x:?!v::A...........n..r:fxS::v....�• v:v.. .................. A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 0t► a% 'y'£'.. 97 358 iiM.REdiP.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206)881-5812 /.;:::;;:;,Jamie Pierre Property REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX (206)881-5441 A' iai ti N:. 1110 SW Grady Way yv::.}}rr fi:G .... C •?..•?::.: Renton . I.{alb{-0i:;ri�{ti:S�.}f ?�FI�#'E.'•.�� �;'American Engineering Corp. -<:a<fNN::::::.>?.{:n<< � :.;:•:::.:::n P' itt:t+ '^{B970552 fE`•�l'�f >''}:t:�?:•:Y,Cheryl Girard P.E. ... ...'.::;• ,� <.>.<{;}r,{ ." ;�Sheer Transport/BRC A1 $ ::'4032148th Ave NE ::::: .>.::<:}::;:x; ,•},..:.. 'yii?%::< :si:n{<x.}f Imo'%°'. K•:r:�%�::��::>;; 's? Wii:! .•,;:i:ii: ::>:.Redmond,WA 98052 •: :�:>ri^::;:�:+:}�:::;_', ;QC-a:M1:�:{v:�fY,>• -+.':?};�+��: ...................... ...............................................................................:.:::..::..�:::::::..;;.....::•:::::•:.�:.,...:...::::..:::::::::::•:::,y;:{:::?a:;•:{;.}}}:}>•:::.i:{.;isa}}n}:a}:ti;ti?•}:a>:-}:•>::.}>•:a•?•}:•}:•:a:}}:''}:{;'}:-i:;;?;•}:•}w}}}:-}}:!a::-:-}:-}»>r •........,,••a:::::::...r•:a:�:{.r•}::?;-:::-:.>}:•}:•}:•}}+:•:•>}}}:;•>:.::{.y.,;.;}:{•}:•}:•;::?•>i}i:-i••i:.;.;•;.}':•}:.}}: tt rr ] :.::::::•r.•:. n.....................................:...... :...::::•.::.............n...,}:.......:.......................rr....................,...r:.r...... .. •• i.:ii�.7. ���y�i��11cc:::::.�::.:�:.::::::.:::.....:::.�i.:•::..:::•>:;•::::{?4'•+.•>:•.r•}}}isa:-y}:;{•:;}:•:•:>:•::•??:;{•:}.'-:•>:{•T>:-}:is-:.: Report Date: 9/3/97 Reviewer. M. Jeong Date Mailed: 9/5/97 ...r.............r ......v..}....}.. . ..........,....................................r., ..... .Re�nal��:.�;�o�ts....::r::.::......,......................{::.::::::-.;:}:<:.i::};;;:.}}:?.}:.i:.}:.:a;:.;};:.}:.>}}:;.;>::<:.;:.}:{.}:.}:;.}:- Moisture Density Relationship Test, #367, dated 8/15/97,#415, dated 8/28/97. • I RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1997 • •f..•...... ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF \:'y. - +'•.1 •v r.:v.:... i{iii{ Q\isj`+•:i}4:::>.:^'::{:;pk:}?}:}::iji':}iii�:�;ii iUtg,....pit#ma:::N ,Y 4`"ri4 4µ:;:,K`:µ::tt:,::`: ,::tt:, THE CUENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION ;kti °.; ;4 'v:ti;:;•r:;r+•:ia;;\`::imo�y:;:`;•`:`.• ,foSi::ti.'t•`.:ti;::;ti;::; :;:;;::•r, :;;.; .; ;; ;,} '�<,: `> .;.i :;:;:.;: ;,«4 u;.;,;; :.: ., EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUTTHEWRITTEN CONSENT OF AA.R.TESTING .; .. iKaa.,+° .W1..,, .•::w;< '<;:>:<y:}•>;:: :v t?;A::;?•: :z::fti.; INC.IS STRIC Y FORBIDDEN. z;:.<:•• } .mow:}.....,...�+•n},,+:•?:+,+..,,+::,,:::a;�>:.}>..{ , �:<::�:::<:.:.:.�+ LABORATORY, TL RBIDDEN. 4 {n{'.k':i}n:}};x;:M1..}+.k.}}:}.•}:v:}k{u:.vn2:+...*..:k�:�:::?�i�{:};:i}::ii::;h:,{ _ -, j •� �11l•.'f'<{:%rY:l•r/l.nv {:.{v.i }.nti^+i} {.:iQ:•ti{' r:?+::}!:.V$:Y!•Nyr•.r{i n'�t,':�°$h;:w'':;.F}{{}fn.W.-..Vi -ti!}:.L}..:.:•.'i:...-....•....,n,.:.,.,,.,-'. ti � �.® -!-.. .. .::.,. ,::�n:::::x:. n:.r $v^.:..%...{\n1 .,..,.. ' . {. FXY•; x :::yty>k • {` y l =y�T •Ta L4 : g,.nl• `" 0Wl2$ri { vvi4onx} .% Cf } xr::; :„R•r ^� {S Y.{ L:.w £ ? / %r! Vv} � .{/ 4.Mw �^ .IM+. i • • • A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. a ° ^<%ry` eT $ L. "` Jamie Pierre Property P.O.BOX 2523 (2� r-::}. Phone: 881-5812 <%}•4•Y:;� I`V-C9 105 REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 r. 11110 SW Grady Way o y,:,: e., Renton I1 i 'w<ii:SAmerican Engineering Corp. ,�f.:nw :s:<; ; ••.;:<:;;.<;< <>:'}.;< R!tjmit N ""8970552 'fi : < Cheryl Girard P E. :<„:<%;s ca O . . .. tieVi.Sheer Transport/BRC ttES <': 4032148th Ave NE WOMEN,k ri{;s-:}:�}:;}v• :f3:`• %n1:``:}•:`+ir:$; R ' ;.:;'•:^;:x: }:•}R�<f{ ::;.;$.;{ ..... ram}`• r? v<::«:::{' ; :*:;:.Redmond,WA 98052 °` :.::..:... r +�:%:•:-'::ii:::$$<:::::%{:vi:$$$$:ti?$:}$:{i:;i?v:sri:;::�R$$:i�'.:$i:•.:i:::::i':i2tii:::;try:'::}}}:;:i;: {�::>::ni :d;.}}}:{{{r:^}!v:::tr};{}::}}:.'.•::{^:•}:•}}:}:i?isi$?:{�{i:i{:$F}}:-i}}iii$:tii�:$} i1>•v.::}}??y:v:$:::i' y�/ �{1� ......... ....... � ..n....•nw:•;;k:::•::::::::::::::+:..�:::........:.:::�-x:::::::::::::::r:rw::::n8h..n•.:•.:}:: :.. �.��{�I<?7•:-��:..�` �,�.�.�:?:::}:>..::n•:::•:.�:::.::::::?•:::::{•:::::n::{:::.::::::n:v::..�::. n.:..: Report Date: 9/4/97 Inspector. J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong Air Temperature: ::::•}:t.i+::}:4:{•}:: .. . : . ................ .......:........... :......n. . .. :. .. }may I ' Heavy rains have shut down placement. Stockpiling only. Last settlement plate in parcel B destroyed all settlement plates,they must be replaced. - 1 1 • • A • • II • - 4 • • .F1ik'4 '�n"i:::::;=;;:;:.::....:,,.::?:..:.:...::-•• --, ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF I ' ;.<>:fik< ' :,' `''`'•>';: a'€#< • »'A>^'"'">: REPRODUCTION h��`��.{1�.��,y�,,y.+.•�W4`{v.$l Y Y���.��;�v���,��xxs�,,w�y� �t. THE CUENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY INC. REP i ?�, �,r x��wax, }� { x? ;,F IXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF AA.R.TESTING :E.,\,':%•v��Yy't•�?!. `:0:., i;} ti e..,Qvt.i.\,, \?c.1, :r. C`x:a ` •. �`'' LABORATORY INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. \`h.\•w.v.�i',4ljyiy i'�"'Y�"ya` ��.•*k ,. ��� a. �yS��4 l4?\:�y}�.q>.v h I i j - • .....-...-..2:f. .i}}: .}:isR.:0-}...S:n'Y":':j:yY.�:tt:ij0:{•:sty •i:•A:'t'-}:t�iv:jiv}:&.:5:n-'1�:�2aw;r.l:ti:i... .................... :: ;1r:•� 'v fCr f'2'v:>kJ:+''.LaYv'„ N:.l,?1'y:•.rxx +�%�T'.k>:a 'v.�!�/••? / ��y�.`. /a i •• ... ., }•.<}Y•r f Y.��):;...{y't;! ,, v„'{r':•}k�':T....{:.:::... .''`�^r;•vi<'•+':3: . 'w!L:':}'•,;-'r•': `i�::S ���-y��'.L'Yi'IiRiliR �. F• k. fi: {:+ }k'L:•i:ti�;f f.:{.fr, t• .�`vt::':: �lr�l Ma �'`� -Fi. r�• :: fY•:;<r'•;•;.;a v ' ' :41: :4 r't} fr.:.::•: e }n :r. tr:•}r•}:•}}:.>:•}:tt:<.>:a:•}:::.::,tt:::.1 , yam', .�':�iiii�:. "" h5�'�};C,.�i�S)+.at•:M>}S?r#if ^:£�'.�: •� ^ftrY.<ry>. �'ir�i¢'.f..'.:1..'<t:nA�.N:'�::�:'�L..>':`•.'Si'.C�ry':'f}}c :•'k:,.;fi'}<..- .. ,.., r:. ::::.::)}rr.:/1f:: a.:+h,L�:r•S�. y::•�.t:.: •Y.G%G: .....:..::...'r�'�:4:::•}:::. I;6:tt:::ttt•}Y:ttt•.:::••}}x}:tf: .. :::::.... .. ..:.::::....:..r.. A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY, INC! .MA ;. >'. P.O.BOX 2523 (206)881-5812 -:?Jamie Pierre Property Phone: :s„: » fir 1 "q'-703 REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 ;x•,1110 SW Grady Way ma y'iiit. -'•. Renton .tfx Ygf/.. � Amenoan Engineering ::>tr:Yt•;.�-0-ak} a.:� ?GEILe>t'M g' n9 Corp.Corp• ,. :ai:gv ii.:.: ,:: MI(iff400;:B970552 "^Ch Girard P.E. ftY':?o:>-) .'. '.�•}::�r•l aryl xr?;++; .x:..:-., , 'r:'<�:k :^Sheer Transport/BRC ";4032148th Ave NE 0.::•Y•"'"`:: - isViM.,.t {:-#Redmond,WA 98052 .,;•••,"n OK4.1,•. ti.};:5.+`::anC:r\y:r:$ ;:i•:r.At:iiiG:S:?•(:k i'.��;'i A< r ........... .............:...: ....... ...... .:�v.:. ... :t.}yn}Ytt::•:::rt.;:.}•,Y;:::n:...'.........:.yK'f:.:•ity:Y'�tL!H{t•:r:.v•.:y.r}:{:i'Y}':L{::.-r:....,.+'::: ............ .: ..... ..,,r ..,:.. 4....t.. .a• -.ar4a{.x{•x:•.,•::r: f7��y�i�:�{�,��•��L.�. t;}•::;::::}:.;:::::::::.....k•.:;-.}}::::.:,t•::::.:......... - .,,.r.:.,,t};.,...}.,:..<:-:k4»:?.:�:xi:{{•::}.:xR, •r.::•nK::.::::}:?:::}:.:....:}:::::yr..::::: •: I.4zl!i4:"i�•f�0a�f�iSK.+..:.::::............................... ..... r........... ..... :,•.R�::}•v::f:}}:::4:k::::kx:+::::•)i:r.•..•....�}...... ..+v:::••:.� :.... S:•TT—_ .................. .... Report Date:::;::9/5/97:::•::•}i;.}:. .::.....:.,.i+>.;::f lt::::: Inspector. J. Landstrom Job T Time: erature:-..-.....-..,:••:.--.•.•n. -- Date Mailed: 10/10/97 , Reviewer. M. Jeong Air p - ............ ......... ..... ,..:.................., v.................n..• ...... ::p/r.:•/t}}}.,}.... Y.:.R...::::•. .}}};T{.-ft{:jj:tY:j-}:-:}(:;}i}:Oi:.iS:ii} :}t:}::< ......nv-......nmiiii,:.............:.............}...: ::................,.... .,.r... : r t:::::.ttrY:•}:}•.:.. ... ).fn..µ.r.:::f.•t:•v:. n..,.-yr:?w.y:r::�}::•:y. f.......:...x.Y:.+•:••::::.......:•...•.�Iil�Si •w :: ........ ..:::•........... t•}}: :!•}}}}:k;.v.n •.•}:•YI'Yilk•:ait::............. ....:..n.....,...........y...:::::::: Stockpiling only tonight. Material is consistent with new sample. J ' I 1 s , `�' t`�"'�"" w,i ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF I :x !'o) Cii� t�}\ YKIT�h ` THE CLIENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION ,�. . �,� `�`' EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING `z. 4 ',: ,,\ xo:�. s LABORATORY,INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. ...............::.:::::::v:._::-: . .:...'iv:.'•:^..}:r•F}};:.n n.0 .w.v::C:'{.i}�\:.Yr.4//.ry/.C.l:n":i}i.....0•'.:.: :.., Ac¢ I ... . .. ..:::. ...:.:r^r::v•}I...:. }..nrf...n.v.R:.:,iv�hY•`. x:A•n xv rrrfn u4:}nt:ni}':.}}Y:•...:: - i..f :..;«t rfr:<r,i.:-., n•;$-:'.: ..>,: .......'w,''.��iR�tV I Y.fv:•• r..}0.+..: ,h4}Vu. 4 rrAf...rr.W.: ::%•.: 4.}{•'.s \.. n•+ w.w!.�;..}.. ..7- .:i:;::.i.i iy..�r!'iiti:iiii:•':i i r.. ':isia''J 2,:..:::.r::.:<::..,...,n:i:rn.. }}. ..f' ::Y: .}.<!•r: .`};::}:•::f r...x:}::i.',. it l...:.:..r .......:.......... t. ..: iii}Yn'i'n}•r±i.}'j:.•.,"f•::::•}}: :{uw:}L.Y.�. .4,.t:n}v}:"•Y:vnY:•i}ik}i}};:iiv.C,G f4]f�f• H}�� �'���,,,.' :: +4. �U$•':tiU�fi:+iff,.{:YjG:4iu;C:i{i4�:/{.i.,xin,?:{•/?/,.�J.flDi:isiYi}!qv..:?iK}iri4:.::::•.v......:....:?Yi//.'Y/{.�i}. ......:ii+�•::.:::: /J ..... i •.v...rr::.........Y,n rw::y}.}•::iii{•}i}:{C:v,:}.n•...................... ..A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. " %� % P.O.BOX 2523 Phone:(206)881-5812 %#"f ;'•`:•'Jamie Pierre Property -/03 REDMOND,WA 98073 FAX: (206)881-5441 0. y1110 SW Grady Way �`'; � `;:;:.Renton ?CEILI •`<> American Engineering Corp. P YAr i:s:t .,'::>i3!f.-A.z.S gri.:<.i;ii:::,fl.;•;f, niut 8970552 A`•1E'#[�1, `:.tsiii05<Cheryl Girard P.E. •}'iiiimi g!Li :: r:•:r,.:x::'r;'.•`.ii:i't>•: b :"Sheer Transport/BRC >�$W::i:::4032148th Ave NE ';:.<>: ,,:•.:::a•:•' „ ::niv: ::i i- frai{n n• M1t }:::Redmond WA 98052 Y, z ;iff, s!' I . .::::r.:::: , ...,.. ....y....-:.:v::::::::::::.:v:x,,,....::i;-. .. iiiiivi:;.}}:ji;Y:ii::!., •}• n•Xv. �-���-}}�►-y� ::iki:v .k.:3C:Y: Yrr;::: - � :}i•}}•.vA:v:.�.; ..n.• n}'••iiiii}:":':.i::}}i ........... .,tYn::niw::•:.c:;n•.t.n..........,.}.:.r........::.v..•i:w: ..••:v:r.;;n...•.tii}:iyr ii:•::: ................... tt. n. n ::::::.....s • Air Temeerature:......... ' Report Date: 9/25/97 Inspector. J. Landstrom Job Time: Date Mailed: 10/10/97 Reviewer. M.Jeong ............... ............ ..t........ . ......... ... ... .. -.>y`.::ii;!; ::ii:i::;::i::;: ;::>i:iiiii :ii.}:.} .: 8di.:;}:.}r;:.:.}}}:.}}::.;}:i.}::ii:i::r.,.>:.}.in.:.�:.:�.:?.:.}:iiii<;<:>:.}isi<.;};;::::.::.:>;„:}:i}}:.: :}:.}:i.: :: - : }}:; .�..t,'.:.:.h.}:.v.}}::;:�}}}}}}a.:i.}}::'.�:>.}'}:::.}:r...r:,...r.r:....i..iii.};}}}:..}:.}:.;:, S . ci#o�A�e>rif�trrn.. 9/24&9/25t- Contractor is stockpiling material. Some Questionable material has been dumped. 9/24-5 trucksof: High organic, black, large quantities of sticks, high silt content. • 2 trucks with large chunks of concrete (2'diameter and smaller) &wood. 9/25-7 trucks of high organic, high moisture,wet silt with sticks and top soil. I li II I 11 * ''` ALL REPORTS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PIROPERTY OF , ii .'•; .: :::.. . .. _- . ..: -:::.:t•....... :�¢}•? is}} `" ` #^`i"y"•K` ti<'~': "'•'•. CLIENT AND A.A.R.TESTING LABORATORY,INC. REPRODUCTION TION I .�k, i .}.:;:•h}.ii:>},�:�:.e.T'en�r�.::xne�:�„*,-: :..�z.. THE � I . `' ,%:N: fi 4�t '* » Wk..6; sk.. �,..4 EXCEPT IN FULL,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF A.A.R.TESTING n�.,:i:-0Y'i mf,. A �� � m r : LABORATORY INC.IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Ck r , ,�aN?"�':�..''''r',b3.�cs' titi,'J�Cn.`.�;�,. �„`�'.^gg\\\ a� �.,fv�Z. � }'. i. `���es acre?'�s"'Y:..:'a'aia•'`••.'`.ktakV':tiVta`,\�`•?r '` ,tu�4 •• •\'�tiC20. •ii44:!i:}nh{C:C4 i+d.t•.,', \Q%i}. <2•.S. ti,' 4.t'�P.m` 15- IZl49', 5 -i-f,R , ELF - Technical Information Report (TIR) Stormwater Drai age Version 2 : Attachment to Rezone/Site Plan Approval Jamie Pierre - Grady Way at Oakesdale Site Renton, Was ington CITY uFf.� G 1I I AUG 14 RECEIVE Prepared for: James and Barbara Pierre 11525 Lake City Way NE _ Seattle,WA 98125 (206)364-2200 Prepared by: L c American Engineering Corporation 0 � �,� 4032 148th Avenue NE Redmond, AA 98052 (, y, ;L kik (206 881-7430 1 .4r -• 33190 .ocZGrsIEi. �S' 10NAL66 July 21, 1998 EXPIRES 05-07-cm I 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS III 1.0 Project Overview Pag 1 1 I 2.0 Preliminary Conditions Summary Page 1 -` I 3.0 Ofsite Analysis Pa7 2 i - 4.0 Detention and Water Quality Page 2 1I 5.0 Conveyance Page 5 11 6.0 Special Reports and Studies Page 6 7.0 Basin and Community Planning Areas Page 6 8.0 Other Permits Page 6 l 1 9.0 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Page 7 10.0 Operation and Maintenance Pag- 7 1 1 List of Figures Figure 1. Site Location Figure 2. Existing Site Conditions Figure 3. USGS Quad Map I Figure 4. SCS Soils Map 1 1 Figure 5. Offsite Conditions Figure 6. Developled Site Conditions 1 1 Appendices Appendix A City of Renton Drainage Easement/Legal Description _-. Appendix B. Waterworks Calculations Output/Pipe Sizing Nomograph/Water Quality Swale Design Appendix C. Operati n and Maintenance BMPS I 1' i 1 ,- I I I i 1.0 Project Overview 1 James and Barbara Pierre own the subject site which is located at the NE corner of the intersection of SW Grady 4ay and Oakesdale Avenue SW in the City of Renton, Washington. (See Figure 1: "V cinity Map".) The owners are in the process of applying for permission to rezone the 2.74 acre proprty from CO to IM so that it ma)�be developed for use as a car rental/sales facility and a gas station/mi 1 mart. The site was partially developed during the fall of 1997 under City of Renton Fill and Grade Permit I 970552. Fill was placed on the property to bring it to the approximate elevation of the adjacent road. S 'orm drainage conveyance facilities were installed as indicated on the plans approved by the City of enton. A separate Technical Info, ation Report was submitted, reviewed and approved under the Grade,and Fill Permit. I This TIR dated June 1,. 998 is a modified version of the previous report which now includes the specific development proposal f r,the project site. The proposed site plan has been reviewed by City oRenton staff and their comment were discussed at a pre-application meeting conducted by the City of(Renton on March 27, 1998. See City of Renton Pre-Application File#98-24. This report has been prep ed as a support (document for the Rezone and Site Plan Approval and most importantly, as support for e projects Public Works Construction Permit Application. Drawings and application for const ction 1 permits will be submitteI shortly after Rezone and site plan approval. This report contains information defining the now existing stormwater system components whi h were II • constructed to enclose an open drainage channel and the proposed stormwater system which 11 collect, treat and convey stormwater flow generated by impervious surfaces associated with developed ite conditions. This report is in conformance with the drainage requirements of the City of Renton, Department of Public Works, Utility Systems, Surface Water Section. The City of Renton req irements 11 for stormwater system design are a modified version of the 1990 King County Department of P blic 11 Works Surface Water Design Manual. II 11 2.0 Preliminary Conditions Summary I i 1 II The subject site consists of six separate tax parcels all owned by James and Barbara Pierre, win h have II been at ne time or are ?urrently encumbered by easements for railroad, high voltage electrical transmission lines and local storm drainage conveyance. The railroad grade had been previousl vacated and was leveled as part of the 1997 Fill and Grade activities. Three sets of electrical power lines cross the I subject site. The owner is currently negotiating with Puget Sound Energy to underground the existing II east-west low voltage distribution lines and relocate offsite the north-south high voltage trans ssion lines which may create a potential clearance problem for future site development. Undergrounding d relocating electrical line will likely occur in August or September of 1998. Most of the work *111 be II performed by Puget Sound Energy. II 6 1 e; • I HI L1 1---W A S I N. I p 3� � I • = -_-r' 9O CL. _ , ` III I 1111 L1'_�\ :;, .x �., II;I r it M Z : \ \ , I I ' i J 1 � .\ D ;i4 �° 1 0 I 2 • 3 Cr I: ' N a II It t'' i m 1I 900 I ',,,,, 3 I i '1!F. rt 1 4 I• >! \. Dr .3 T E C. .H N N . 11!;iC _, ,-E-" �' r o 93 ;i. W 1' 1' m• a. (21 Il ir-rii7;;�li.-• '•I ' ,'ki �.' Q 1 0` I. _ -� - Q d Y L t • \�4ti' S.13016-80 i.' Cr z , rl' ..i_J4 Z ' II� 1 I I 1;r.11 e• � --Ia ' O 1 / 1. . COMMERCIAL-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 103 - >� O F•- , 1 C E1! = c� i 1 / �a ;T i I E R I a I, Z I • os m —i ~ J �`i cc . ... _�:.1 U E.. r I • 1. .Ia• 403 it -- 950 I I L fiJta I- r i + �5 r 1037 • SEWAGE' 1� i II�S II '44' ' 1 TREATMENT 1 • Il` EAGLE HARDWARE ++ T. S r' r•r y:6 --' 1: I CORPORATE OFFICES ++" 1 s i• \ VACANT �I ' I ,,,.r SOT PLANT 1 1 0l ? .f'� .° S.W 8 Li I 1 ,1 :-. • I• I J• .-- to 9 Il eISB- I 11 1 'kV I •r1- - -- -1 VACANT +L � er, . - -i 4-4“93 1-4 1 I t 2 '; i PROJECT SITE /�� WAY. ° , - `1111 A 1,,,i_pi _61 3 1086At II I �Q / RP I 2d 25� ! G ti i II92 : oii��� •,, al RII10981� 'yy�r-, µIIS115II I v ri ,.: S' n6115 k I. �53 51 R, y II -r-'' 9, $1UPL ..-.%-; 11.. , lisp- 111�i r"��d140515 i IIS71 u �• �I r+ S 1 �p.LT o: i6 62 4 fS IS,:(i 1J"i'14 dill 3�°!45i_I I I I-I_u.--, r �, r^ ( i '1 Y -1 PA ✓lam 3 t - ,��!� 1 CITY__1_IVERSITY r rt a 2 6 51413� c �r` !i G: •' �D0• - -�1-34 35 S6 31 I I y„ I I 33 y1 v I f F � 3 29.30i31132 ter. 1111 /1 12I11110 24 5 7t E3 .0_66 1 .o`i tz , ; y.: I _ ,�f- l o .JJJJ11��� 122t3 ';; ' _ �-" j 8 it 10 9 8 11 1- - r 1 1j4 I'116 . . s et• .. I UNDERPASS W I 16 1S 13 IZ ';..sly"52 5354 5156 '' • I r, ` atJ-1 61212423_ 212019.1111- • •..o• .,64 TTT:N • I ,r.1�^ I UI/Y: jNTE.RSTA1 :... .... , .. .. — ITS. JCCESs 04 — ''. :SH6! i 'II g• LIMITS* 9 8 2 6.. 5'r''7' PI 6O I __join D• T 7-01 call I 0 6 II . �s�34,as :star _-1-.,"ia� ' • ' r.�.a I 'f[ 1 A I I .J - °I t'FZ ,a1 rr16�361 a.,a + I !..6Ac .. W Iiolelc41'L , 5 s 4 3,045 $_ Ib:• i1 =1 ' b `` fn 35 rf=1 I 7148 J'4. II0�9•''(((T5 ti q _la.a- (� 1 1�y F }��' I 157 Ac. a0 12 11 A7� �� '� ; Is 3`31 1 I 1t 34 t 1 my1, Y. • WIT C�1 .s g r s16 30Tr�� 4 9+may a I i - o(..(����� s n 11i20 ii Ito ai �n i6 19 ttlIt3 to is 261,2121191 I71p20 tl tt 23 4,25 1 a t9 31 G' jel 7L S6 !se , J6 Aii • •~• • I . ..I LP6 .F.r....... . W I �o ` S.W. MM. 16TH ST .� ^ , , e III l - 44 1...1 11 I !•1�1-F I I I I I 1 1 Y�I c �-I'1' II�I'y-1,I�I l 1 fill ill,i�U�:�Iil iI I ! I I I I I c 4 I 11 I I I�Y,� y - I I I, I a'r ! I I�: I .1 ap.1,1 I 1 1 1 .II,I::11{91311 1.1 r' :+ -t- • • - •131t L6li'I'IIIII;Iii • :1°-1-I I 151413121i ui ::1"1"1-L13111 e1 0 _1 i ,r PI I I I 1'1 v_V -- 1. }vL _L.L 1 LLL!tJ-- ,fL__ Lcr.J�fJJ�1t4 �]t_L IT: a. $44 . Q 4 �! a Lai ' $Q g 9Het rr + 1 �.N__9 I u- y /qy�./ /G�p p -rle o t'ij°f-e••L-a-•.__rL7L_ \.� - `1•:2•_k O _ III-1- v L- /y� .�j6r logo•X-r_,--if .,` — - I.1 . i I 1 it I_ r• ` ' —J-- I • NORTH I s a•-_ —_ i 9 ,-- - /Jj w '�' r i { 1 . \ III \__ . a_-____11- _. Pierre-Grady ay Site �®-= --- Technical Info' ation Report . „ s---.P"- T Site Location - Figure 1 The City of Renton has an existing ieasement for the storm drainage flowing from east to west through the subject site. (See Appendix A "City of Renton Drainage Easement".) A formerly open drainage channel was, for the most part, enclosed during 1997 fill and grade activities. Storm drainage facilities installed as part of 1997 fill and graide activities included : Two parallel 48 inch diameter culverts to convey east-west stormwater flows in City easement Four 60 inch diameter manholes to access the 48 inch conveyance system One large vault which provides access to both 48 inch culverts 100 lineal feet of a grassed water quality facility at the north property line adjacent to Oakesdale The water quality facility is 100 feet long and has a grassed bottom width of 3 feet. The sides consist of rock filled gabion baskets. This facility was approved by both the City of Renton and The Washington State Department Of Fish and Wildlife. The 2.74 acre site is presently vacant; contains no impervious surface improvements; and is covered with sparse grass. The site gently slopes from east to west at a grade of about 1%. As previously mentioned, the existing onsite drainage conveyance facilities were constructed as part of 1997 fill and grade activities. (See Figure 2: "Existing Site Conditions".) Except for the non leveled area beneath the north-south electrical transmission facilities, the',entire site and adjacent parcels are categorized as flat. (See Figure 3, USGS Quad Map.) Soils located beneath the 1997 fill are identified by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) as Ur-Urban Fill (Ste Figure 4, Soils Map.). As indicated in the Grading and Fill Final Close-out Report, a majority of they material placed on the project site contains an elevated clay content which is moisture sensitive and likely unacceptable for foundation support. Localized soil investigations are recommended in the vicinity ofleach proposed structure to determine the soil treatment and foundation design parameters. The Hydrologic classification for stormwater runoff calculations has been defined through site exploration and testing of the fill which was placed on the project site. The stormwater calculations will utilize Hydrologic Group C. Onsite drainage patterns indicate most existing surface flow drains into the constructed water quality facility. Topographic survey indicates the existing sidewalks constructed as part of SW Grady Way, Oakesdale Avenue SW and Powell',Avenue SW street improvements drain to existing drainage collection systems within the city streets. There is also approximately 0.23 acres of grassed area within the City of Renton right-of-way from which surface flow drains into the onsite water quality facility. No other offsite drainage flow appears to enter the subject site except for that which is conveyed from east to west in the 48-inch subsurface culverts. (See Offsite Analysis, following.) I _ 3.0 Offsite Analysis Offsite contribution consists of mostly undetained surface flow from a 44-acre upstream basin which enters the site via twin 48-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe(CMP) culverts under inlet control with projecting ends which have the approximate capacity of 35 CFS each flowing two-thirds full. Surface flow from the project site is collected in the existing onsite 48-inch culverts and exits the site combined with offsite flow via one 66-inch diameter CMP culvert under inlet control with projecting end section which has the approximate capacity of 80 CFS flowing two-thirds full. Offsite areas contributing flow to the existing onsite system are shown on"Figure 5 : Offsite Conditions". The offsite areas of contribution were delineated by American Engineering Corporation and verified on March 20, 1997 by City of Renton staff I II . ,:I 1• • • I , I I I I • /�- II �! 1\ \ igl a d , �-- - . \ ' f/ I� \= la�e�r • /1 fal�.r // 1k i; , --- \•a ',vt,i'4','1'.q.1,',0,..,,'1.,i':•'•.iW•ha .A•e u rt-iI'.'''.:'V-1 la .\ ‘ ` _ $ 4 t I. .•4 14i III1 \\ \ ;I „ 1 • \\\__,l y l, 1 /— "let lar-ra 41'ir-f 100.;-: ''' k. \ t .4..„..----1 kJ \ k v, . 0 VA. r g \\ \ \ 3iv _ -4 1\4 . 'i---- r \\ !.\ \ ----' ‘ '7,,,ighl,:i1,, \ iRg / \ # .44: 6 13 ''iil:.;.''.!.:J.'1;;•:" \ -4 R --.--).k. 1 1 1.) ti-A--4--____. I lir -0 d •' (I79 E ;?. \ ] \ J 1 1 ►lugs{ 'o1 \ \ 1\ \ ,i( 0 id Fi iii',1'::•• ,� m - r /'‘\ ‘ ill im % 0.1ra®SOO� a• \ I . <0- -x z \\ L''•;'$1',.'''.,' : I k._ -1 rt'AvI' PI co if, \* .:I,L „ ...,( i MIN � 1. C z pp ti ,O - \ ,,.,,,..z.„:, .:,:,,. ...,-, ..„..,, . ,,..,,,,,t ------\-\ ,„ ,, ftri l• \ os UQ nE \ II\ I 11, \ t ( 0 O \ 11 1 p 1 \ I1111, gt�.' o.ra) 1 p p �! 7d `D • I 0 \ 1 O \ \ 1,1 l I it ,\ . \ 81 1 , N , 0 !, e d A merlcan EnOpn.n • Plaansr• • aarr yar• •°'• 2—XX—oB P^*''^• II��� �'a co b GRADY WAY C o9l oration p°n"dnw"Ara NE. AS SHOVE N� '' �• Br a a FILL PI CEMENT — j AS BUILT P ;... : :;::: aa.. — -r l-• ca EXITING SITE MAP m«u(4 Z)061_7N0 (11t1)1.1-7fat °�'�° cc = • Dal•pbil•0 lalD,p tidal• l7•path t Nome aww II IF 1 ' 2-10-0a ( 1-1 IP:\1007\0703LWIP0a0.DW0 II �IE I I1 i k 'ril \\mem it\D...... ;li L - .. .14 ..--..-m-........,.... ° Emilio I, %'11 \, ,kI ffloi11 ci-'4.i;11c,.,r,,y.,\Ttlk voirm 0 .12)..aimalime.. t.iiii ,.,.,,. II••,,,,,,:,1:::;i ! )" ! 1 .. ts 11111111 ..:ite V 11711 1.1 itcl .. ::,::::::::,:. 'vit , 8 Ed 1 ENW_..`k .:;•_:'.\.2. . 1.1,4:1 . : .,. ., ,, ,, .,,,,.,•.,„:::,...::::: :_ i. . .7 ,4. "6a-N Am n 4,411111_,,eimir .i. e.u.„-:. - :• 7---,..,.-., A f„:t•A ,..,kgg.gi. '1 mi 1..1• A 7. ••'. , Ir. ....sam__. .nom .. - t.2-' ' ey / On Si..., iiii -1.-:110 ' Mal. • ••Alm ::z...4.-,,,..::„„t t k. vt-,-- iiii5i , •,- , , , - - •••,..t,c, ..., ,,. ,,,1,15 Em,_,.:*\-\7113)......:. ,,_ ., -\\._, ,. IPA_ -. 1 • C. i I ' ----"..• •••••/ 15-' -11 ..,.• •T • ;':_ c--;_-•' il Al"';•'TR . IV !.. i____,„...'''.1:11‘!'::-...7.;0101" SS• --A L4'..m,.icAlio i...'.'. '''.; si , i Stadium I iiii • 'I' 11.,,,,, / • s,..----.1 , ...j.•2.• . -. N't.! 111\%.. k,„- 11111 i' ...t•L‘i\ill i 4 '''1 1 4" • 2..,-)iiiiNI Ir.& MTh ‘•V`V":*M i 1 I 1 li C \1 1-,';'4-71-. •• ! I 6-;:4, 1 --1 --. • ---- , 1'..,,, a •••••1• l'El...1., .. \al METEIIIMMIONEF/iiil 4.: • __„,../i .---• 7----• „ \ .-:1:-.•% .l•I.'• :•M ' 11 maingiiill ik.vb : l'.1 ''''' • .... ; : '. : • ..I .-4,___.----, Fr, . ...-7-1 -N.:V:1v:.. i,:I;::'•';r •!, L g.,...., • ., „Li... iirml,-.-.=-_•"m-''-;_79-.s.0-m-)... mR-.a....fi-„-w:-•a-s-7.-im-.-l-•o•••-w•/-..L.'-...---..-t•e-:-.=_:.•.,.1;.2--•-.1----.:-3•.-r••4-•"_•1.-1_-1!._1 II.._-SE-_-6-ca_-h•55. '•w1‘LIVfiMcEN imN_sItBI-b•-a•:....•,-.•:--.- 14';'.,'-7\..-_:"..1'..",,:"'!'..,".1.i3.4-.l._1:,.7t,*e:<;,lv..•?4'."°A•I,"1I...1..-1-.,c"..=....'_."_H_....•i...gc....h.r.-._!,I'. ..-"'',Z;.f•..:.:,,1A...•-'.--..i',1.•W0..'...'1ii1:rp1:,••,•••1•11-..1BM.t 7DiI.E8n°E W..t.1..':F76 - - 18 h . fe• 0Park •\:'./-,,::..'c.':•.,i.'-',..4.i:;- :;..•.t``4,,,•-• • 1 ilb _ -„,', :.'•,. 1006•-;--- :,-.• • --:'------:: ' Pigkri: -`4*444Fitin :' .:4. a -.7.::: 1[111"1 „diger _,..„..... .., .. ..ar .:':.--------4 • -" ---.... ...,..., ••!!. •• Z1 .h.,.ei I:I I:4, ,, - _z__ . . 17.. a . •.• _-,-...„ _ 1 ,,•_--;,, _ ___.--..-.„.0, ,„,.,i, \ :••.''' • •.sas•..6171.7:- ill 17 _.•--•,i; \..1,:„ "-----___c_.... .., •''. " -. -Jr•. 4 .Ir . ! --.... " ' - :- • 1-11Q...1,TAtio C '•'''' q,Ock, , 1 ar ' ---____---\%, .‘.:K„,_: -7-;. --..•,--I4 • 1.. .._14_1 .." °'Ir .,1 Mg r II t41,-j ,„..2.,•,_ -„. • (,-,-.. ., 4,-:-......-cip : G.--...i.,----...\- :-.•--"•'-•:-...-7 -"4-aillil;''''"" : '.° 1111111 .\ ..\\\ . •=•••,----';•:•''.....-1111111111.111 g II I•;-:- ' -'•7-7:-:''\ *\7-_6-••=------- 1-- ) -Pierre-Grady Way Site III r .-: .2 • 1-".• F---____-;:------::: • :iiL (--:,. ,__._f__.;.__-_-,.-„\i J ; ,-\.•: ; INIEININ - •//•,•:, 11 II;•:• -.--,- ---------------V";- . ; • tip., , . ,-, e rlington 1"-' .1 , i'm m" rigliall.11111/ 4 '...... i : /:.:111111".-,\•- , Eatioci• \ .1. s s\ •. „ . Go Course • 17:,... ma a . ....„..,11; .,.._,,..,_,Tor 1 4 .41../ I• Park--.' i -74,,": - - •cit--- . - : 1 g z -11 =I I ' :I I oe '%' \\ ill .7 1,•?.o.A - . • *mi.- ' - •0‘-':--iii 0-). .- ) , I ili mi I! -., 1 1 .c;'-,,•\\-t •4--=.' i A --1-1.11 - , 1 r •-7%. • ; . ,...,--- • , ' 1 J• •Se e ecio. 01)•,,,sollipor..' •• --- Iritio• Substa 11 ' • ... i r...,I, .._, ,....... ...„ . ... . 041°12:' .... ..„ ii "' ' l• ' :• _ •( ,:. , ..-.....,.... 1 „ ..... . r )62-,„.,. Y 10 . , .. Ill!I 1.i. ....--N••.,• . . •! • 231 \ s\ s'I')°°' - ,'1 Oa ..• ''.% SubsTa on 1 '- . 2,7 ; • '• • Ir--.....=•411.1 .I j .,,.!--1:4,a, .491111- , 1tb11‘._•Akt.-,‘.1111.".A..1, F\j- '. , \{ •, .., .:. iiiik4 . , .•-•-- lokur.se;:w s • ---.- i , , . ,r, ,-- • ... ,_...,1_..4og ‘,.. g is • . •• •,:z.,_. . ._ _ r • 4PG sk C ex.!...--"-•:".„..9 F.,_.,. \:. '';'.. ' a-9 \•-__, - ..:: --_, !..,671 ...- iil , '•-•-. - ‘,\,3§,a ---; __... • ..._ - Ill - \ ,,1.1%i •sci:••"4 '••'' 1 ss. , A,s,\ , 1 1 „ .] \• IIN. .n“ •' \ # \ ,... .-/. '--I ' _,• • Z 110 -f411(I 11 1: 14 " '‘,-6__...I.U,g ... 1--- , . ..- - - ,...._. --• ') .:•;) '575:‘\Y• • -_,../-jOir • _ • .0 ‘i :I•17-7 \ '40‘ ., •a ,• iii- ii `,',IL" !bp, 9 '- ) 1 ,-:71'.7. : - . • 4'1%,- • „tn..... •_,....... , ..,- ,_ .. ..rhy,,, „ . •\ di.1 • ". 11 ',..70 ,1== I i 1 • , --' ... - .._ .1,,,,. , ..,,,.. . F-- ••11 .---ii 1 i . 6-,y, ii== 1 r.,1 .1„ „ ... ..._ ___ ., . \ , • J \\ I'. , li --JCC 11,== I .; =I' . . '..,:• , , . --.‘',1\, '• , 1, f:. („. A 1 i, , ,,=- ; •,...„ .-1-.. .-...-- , . . .., . r I ii== •.. •:--1: ,-- 1 . sS- 2 Alin • \ ' c ^i I '.J !•! ''\`6 ,,,ii' ' .1 - 2730 .. ....., --.-i7,...,•.,,,;..',p-ar•ik•1.1••:L,_- "' •'1-i _-•-.7.-•-,-----..I•1 Talb0o,.t,".;...0 k• i.-,,.;,I._._•_.•...._..;:,n,•••••p•i,i3..°."s.--•a;---'-7.-,1)7;1%)-.;.\\1,•:-'';..• ':••'•r'j - miac!ii. \. 4'.\7-•__.•:.kd•..%- , , e Substa I ----,1,.: _ •••• .,..•::7,. 1 la : ,•.: 7{..---.- .; I zr,hr, ...1,21-Ili,. ....\.,. •,\ , E Jill;Nr:,4 ,,T;;. 1 -5--______ , ea;. -..- 1 -,.- ,..- All Will • . •, ,i', . e., .'r 4:..........:k , ubsta 1 " , .; .1.1, , ...:..T' F.!.'.1's.• :1 1 A -=...7-• 1- . 1 , ' 1I RENTON'__ • -7 I -; • 11; . Alt. . ... ,,,,, iv, • '.,,i...• , 0:,:,.- -S< „:•--, , . ,,, r•?..: 0.,i71• •:, •• :, gill,.ak Ay I 11 TUKWILA_ . .. - •,. •••:-. .; 0 , • \\"`7 •..4 :., -'" . ,.. • ..1•', Pgrit 11 -. 4 Z 010-•:__;',.. 7- I .,.-. .. :•., • • \\ , •i.;Ts : "..,.---•.i i r 1,41.y .. . • a : V. ''I••,..--• \ , - maw,*,,v .ap =7 - 414- -'-.. 11' • -) “.•• \ \ ‘ . !:,,•, .--- • • "wi'-4r,:-/• --' I -X • 1------ ... . 30 ,,, 1;;", , ••, !.. !___, 1 .i., -,./ • , , r,, I.' I • : .1!..-029). " wi it' .7.9. •.1 14 .25 -• - • -• *,;-Al. ' ' ' ••.! .-L"::,Sift:::l''. - • • 'Tukwila 1 • • __,',\,. \,:. , , ':;7„ \I ..,-;Th• . 1 1 i , . , a a <..c .,.-•:" "'I\' I:: , ' I .. -..-/I ; t•• a• ' .... ,.. , , . _ , i - _..;,..::' ;,;.1.; • ''155 Irrin=willis ell 7------I-7-- 'Ili -4./.: , ‘• X . ' 4.. .. ,__ .71.7, •11 1 .; . 0- -' omg '. .,...-....:, :,. : • • : • .. cs:? .k° , ' 1 ) SO : le'.. • i .- 7 .0 1 kit .--___---/' 6; •111:::,:::::,:i:K. ' .(\.. ' C. • --..,;, ' •- , \ (...; lireen i • , . /7 , 7• -4 LI "7 gi.Y.:. •f% ' P • • '•,,,,• 1. I 1 .I 1'--j ; I • i . ^..• ' i I 11; i I •ait tf, -.•., r , . 1 d'• : , .. ,, .. ,:: 1 •••f•- , r-m.., - i -• :.en-I - i , - 't•..T..-- - t. kg Ill ()riffle ' . •Nr-• -,....,,, . ., 1 ‘ '''s: BM id 1 . gthraN CORP i ._.._ BDY.___.•;141). d.. .7,- 2a" - - --- u ;., •11 -... •. ...., r , _"..: . ,... ..,.. ..." '------ 1 - 4 • KENT • co • •BDY• • Fr,..„ . L, ,. i i • , ,. Pierre-Grady Way Site L. '----- a .; • ..I I • / .ubsta I.1 - 1--e-;: g.-. 1 I 1 I Technical Information Report 36 • - g. - 41.c i . *: 7. ..1 /II I USGS Quad Map - Figure 3 , --, I 1 _ - I.I •--"..- .10‘,..tr -...:....i i .., / Ill . , .....-, .,1 , 1 I , - Suos `\ • °9 I .••.• .'".•• tad ri. ���I�IiL 11 �� '■ !I v..��:•:'``: I Ur • I.• L.. �! is ___:, �. ---,I ■r'l . Bill fiver fi it 1C.•Ij7�: I ., 1 - •? A R 0' � k� ' 10010 . itrit: , I %4-• (..1.... ..::::..—. .... *:•N•••\ '11 •:•..! ll'h gc k __ 1471 1':77:71,,.4. 1 !� IL A. •/ • !: '.ubsta'�'• BM .� 11�I11111 ,cr Eiel� li .bri: 1�1 I. AkF -`' ' 1 - ���" •6 �` /� Wippory,4' BeD •' /��� L w 1 L 1 r'' 1 . /)� IN oi. ..I �M1 1 900) .. 4;agrill4 /a I ° i / �; --:.'• = a 1 --- I ii dillw, i _ Beo .�. / I -I, �, •/�'� '" I' -40:• .--,.. % ..-. ,..c .. \ '/•'; Y Via; ' • - � a \ AkF.:;� 91 Q RA�ROA�D Tu \� 1• lts �iii �. \ ," I q• �` OHO - �•'ef.. 'a''0.s -`• I i ,—� - Illi 1, �,::, 'a \ li /`� 5.\\;.) Wt,� �ti Pierre-Grad Way Site li • - t,► �� �d� �` `,�\ " III r co \ ..AkF•' {�'�._ 0 / Wo 1ri,„,„,.„4 7 ,... L . Ng\441 ii13 I .';� I I _- ,* • 'i.„;- :.AgCBM I.GoI1�Course I I • ! ita�_- AmC '• ' Wo i� UrA IFri ' ±a . I • r'•: -.-�3, :, _ill \ �f�% mil° I BM� APY � � P i � • 7c�� ew- OFT rgal�e •''. , •, A .'\ 20-^46,, '1 2• \ Ezi __�,� V___,__\_... • - 'Su-bsta i mC;�_=: N AgC /_ - 44111 ..•r•II . rC' q• .r1�► g 20 _,;._.:JLE) e. ..,,-r 'c'll: a l ll i ,M: 71▪ •r'`1 ice Ur _ __ • /r• •u •l Pu \!Ji. �� ;`TI Longacrel Ia Pu __ I,��i ` W/O BeD u, • 'rBeC \ • all - , III! Irli Ur l _11 'I�. ii, A O !mi l •.:•.�1:1. g �. 1 , Track '� ■I� •lJ u I yJ' tt mil 5 =- --I -- — --- — • d--- 476 . _ - 7..1 il -- ;: ., i Ur-- Ill I 11321 l's '• I • • '4( I, II I1,• u 1' W Pu m so • I Wo 1 I +� lip: BM nii u4>\ •• 1 �1 : ) l �� 1,it 25 • iil ' hi,„,,,, s 29 . �' • l6flAgC • I iii • Wo I Ur • ""��\ I I ham'".. - MC F ` • . •4 - :. ..._.,%• r, 1 . ,. . i1r` ,_E_ i _ 111, ._....17_•- So „ .. . 6;1 ` AgD 9 Iti-1. `` II I ` Pvill Wo 1 i -- .� .J •1 �• - z ilipe stir, .0 Pierre-Grady Way Site' $ I..ft 1 ..d. 1 r i�i .— - - echnical Information Report aI I , �. '9�'� Soils Ma - FiNif▪ -,.• ��•_ ,!'" �,_ I P gore 4 I I I I 1 , _, 1 . ' _,,,,,r• .. • •'' • ,0111,.••,,03....„. „....---- .......,..„--- ,.•••••••., \ \ „., ..... .\\ \\•1 L., :;...........................: ::..\to\ti....t.P !....'''...................................,1", ! !\ \ • ' 1 -••• 1 . ,e.6 . 1 • 1 • ...... 4‘1• • \\........;:....1......V.....,1, list ...,....,2•••••••••••:.Ntlelh;I: , .. 1 ' i• ,•••••••• / \ 1 .. I ! . ---- t, i•• ‘ ,.-1-. ......._,----------. I Le) 43 .. .. / .Z.. ...... ... ..•••-• --•• . !.. 44tk- - • i 1 0 • .....-- %%\ 1‘ N.._ .41 \ • • CA • ' rli CA ..... ' •%414144 . i ,..•••...,....... VI II I 1 . • .............:-...,.. I 44. it. 1 : •..•••• ,.......... \„, ti!!.. !. i......- ''''' . .N 11 il, 1 1 i \ t `,I — . . ...- i i A _r, -.1 , ll . ._ , - . , .. i..... _ ood.wwwel wrw000renv ..... 1 7•Fiowe,...trive--41/..--di 7 \\§, . _ l— , ,•,pk. 1 I ' 1..' ''..1 I 1 i 1 • i . . , \ p.N. R.R. ' Co. . • ,1 _ I i 1 I I •••••„ • 11,ov . • \ • ..1. t 1 I r4 A ...• ......... ......._ _ —Tiloraa.s......A.W.e.......S,V_ • ............ I `s• 4 , ti • ;) .,...... . 1 iit,N,k \ ‘ d " 0 ,1 Pi A P jUilit........S.. .-..-.... I.% \ g4. layriond Ave SL ..•••• I ' I V i li! Ilk •••:„St". . )'',......" i •. •••,„ \ 1 . \ %I ! ' "32" \,,I •-• .• , s, 1/ . • , 1, . I " . -r`) t , ••,•l• ?I• ........, _____ ___:\ la . '.1 '''('-1.• \I -,........ :,. 1 I • •Il (4. • • 1 . i. _ ..... • ...eneact • .... .1', Lle •,cti..-1 q...4.1.•:,...t.eA I sl.. '''''',:g •1,I• !I • 1 ...t 11.,::!,:i.:_ill:1 V\:•\.: ,:if,',:i1V'"\;•4..5...7.i.:7, 1 .. ii 1-- i ...........'...1....1. I'll .....• .. ..! el` \ • . 5 .... : g \if / t .: 11 1 ' i • 1 ,..;;,".„;,' i 1. ye. ',.,i. • 1 LA Lind Ave• " ••vis,i,o;.,..4,0.1, — y....4„„,._...........,:,.._ --, •,.i 1 , (..e.)(1.........1' • fi Lind 1 . ..,,,, ., e -.• •,".;;_....1,,',.,-,7:......1 -- VD I , El i 1 Ili 'If i d\ ..... • ......„....... . . . . ,,,..,. . . , •,, ...„.„.,,... : 1 . .... . , . 1,,:. . ..:.„_. c.. •,... , \:.,., it, ‘.,....„... . .......: ....., ' A airlai f.it 1 / , '.-. i \ •N 1„Nol..e..,,-,.. f - .-c. . 7.7 ' • • 41. :.: 0 8 A 12 '....,,, . I ... 1 I G 136qi ! ri \ CV '. i. .A1.1:... • '.1:- * • . . 1 • 1 1 • 1 i ,g11!1 ....I.1 m t ,,,,,.. .,.. ,,\ 1,. '. i• ..••••. kligi<1 '‘.......,...., 1 ter • - 1 • MI••• c \ ' 1 0 111;i .... .e y......:.:: cc, .•....•,, . .... . 1 ]::. 0 ,„, ,:.• , ••• .,....,,, ,, . . - ggX \k • . . I ...... ..ri - ...... gl''Xii . `-•,•• ,',.• ...:, .. ..... g . '•.1 1 g - . l., • 11P ., ... 1Ral :Nj.-1.. \.....(4 . .• \ )'..,',..t .... . . • ./." ,. ni .. -., ' :"' i. Co lap ''ti.',':T,p... • :.: 0 ilig 1 a .•... . ". _ • • L ..,,i..i,..:,.7,..7-,1,. ...ii.- ._...,.,....,..,...,...1 . liculf.iie,..AY.e 1'./......14 ...i..p..........---' / .1 \ \ 0 nip 1/44 ..1.__.\.'144 . .......... ..........„.„......... .----""i 1 i 1 t • ..........„....„11 ..-•••••-• - ....... ..--...144apit p A 1 t. ‘ t ' •Wx.: ••!tt..'? :. 1 t • 11 • i E 1 ' . • \ v ••••.. . Zip\ i n. . _ .-.-----"-------___ I I t • •K 11 g:••• :111. i, •: . g 1 • • 4 ‘.1;44;..41.:.-St. - I • ; . k ‘ , ., ... 4 ., ...,•,1 A _. 't 1. - CR1D \ ,•.., A ., , J••'• ....... . ..-:,. ,c‘' r• .'4 A .••\ "1."1.111A)ri ) + 0 • I k ",.. I . . fir). .N ..S ' ' t - '• • /k IT ...\\ .1 I I t ; ..,.,... . : .,14A -..„_ :Ns.,s.s.ik, 11,1 ...... . -- ' I'll '.\ '''' OA'0 10 . . . 5 T.;.\ : ..- " - ... .,tv,. %. t + Efr 1 ..„....„ ....... .....•. .. • 1 . i I I -............_ 1 ,,........- ..'• ....\. 't .,• • . 'T 1 ' .. .. AD-•„. ....L, . .'...?* ... ... .... . . • s. . • *.k, '..... 1. 6.i 1, 1 --, i11... ...........,., Ivil 1 co . t . ‘ as ; 1 Shcittuck liVie 1, H• I 1 ' . 1=13 s 5. I 73CA , d '‘.. . ...t..... , ...... ... .............,.. ... ..,.. ........„... .-1......:—. _ _ • A ID 0 . 1 1 >C mc t .4 I Vi : .. 7,1 .t.), 5„,....- i;•••••••..1..••••••:•-"c -1:1•ii• ,i' 1 Li. 0 iza 1 r-i >>0 • ............-re,,,,,,,firf .....HoseA.Lnr9 - Tr 7 :' .....;...._ , ,, .• I i r-,-.0,,,,171 on—1-1 ill lohlt60 it . i t v\ ._ •4111711111111 11 71 .1.'3. B g rl, tri mm f:t. r,., . 6 c,nrri ,i, i \ 11:i". ', . • r171-; I i 1 : T I I..• PC, 1.••••••• 11- •••• a•Q 0 , . ." 1"'q N.Nal \ , ,.• ‘\ = 11C3 I \ iiii ; nr 1.111. 1 !6 ! '1 0 1 1 i 2 kri mr71 0 Ut \ e . 0.,.... , • ...:,..1.1ii ' 1 li..111.4.!,.i. CD g CA CJI • • Z I 1 \ I .17."1-1-i ! [ ri tliiiiii ..I • .11 -f.i..-nr--1 i'' ---• 1 1 1 . l • t 1 i , . L . s • .. I ;2\ ?1° 571,11 ',. .. ...1 i I 1 iii- 1 -4' 11 i i0.-i 1 1 t ' ' 4 1.1 • 2.1 N '�1; I V 1 /4 SEC. 2 4 , T W P 2 3 \ l�L. 4 E , V V V I , CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ___-------��a -- ~ 1ATTEND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING wITH CITY 70N?OF EN DEVELOPMENTINSPECTOR. - - - -- -_ - - ENTRANCE PADS AND MAINTAIN 0 - --- -- - --- - 2. IT OUpi IT ROJECT Z Q 3. INSTALL SILT FENCING AREOUTkLu. 3 O 4. BEGIN GRADING. REMOVE APPROXIMATE`.'A000 CY. �W Z I O Y 5. CONSTRUCT CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING DRAINAGE WATER -.IaQ CL AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS 0® IJJ 6. VERIFY KING COUNTY DNR/WTP APPROVAL OF SYSTEM CC {_ CONNECTION THEN HAVE CONTRACTOR OBTAIN METRO APPROVAL - Q- N I OF CONNECTION PRIOR TO PERFORMANCE CF CONSTRUCTION. Q 3 I ; I 7. BEGIN CONSTRUCTION CF BUILDINGS. NOTE Z I --,.-.r 8. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND CONTACT PUGET SOUND ENERGY 4 = V THE NEAREST AVAILABLE NATURAL GAS FOR ELECTRICAL AND�7CTIJRAL-GAS-S NCEPANNEC710NS._ANO - CL \ DISTRIBUTION (2-0) MAIN IS LOCATED IN METER LOCATIONS. I Lul 1 POWELL AVENUE SW APPROXIMATELY 500 FT a \ /,f NORTH OF SW GRADY WAY. 9. UPON.COMPLETION OF UTIUTY CONNECTIONS FINISH SITE WORK LI —W N \ / , 1 MTH ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION AND PAVEMENT SUB GRADE PREPARATION. _ I ��t1 I 10. KEEP AOJAECZNT STREETS CLEAN AT AU. TIMES. Z W O \ • a3i4v T COVERED VE}IIgF ~ \ ' _' j _ L--I - 11. CONSTRUCT WATER GUILTY SWALES AND ESTABLSH VEGETATION Q U / WASHING_BAY eo s,rs v ram 1 I I \ - AT EARUEST POSSIBLE DATE. Z w \ :IAA - OIL/WATER SEPARATDR �12 'Ec ��� '-'-yl / �� --� c `� - ' 02 \ \ =E;r_= METRO P.H f i;.ti; WITH EXTERIOR + -, j 12. COMPLETE PNISHE0 GRADING, INSTALL'WOAD:T. N Q -+3.t1 VA 4.: SHUTOFFIVALVE CONNEC- r , : , 1 ` iL.# /Tom-y I ,Q W \ Sr-7!y ;U `=^�yC-� ( / VALVE 1,•� SANITAR - i i T/ -y 1 11 CONSTRUCT CURBING AND LANDSCAPING. \ NV-2C ;DUT S.^'2• �Gj f I j ` , 1 s >/ - - - j t ,��„�s'"�- t / 14. OBTAIN OCCUPANCY AND UTILITY PERMITS. MAUL:METRO Miii a° \ RBA.:t4.02 :.6D // --i4 \ C-t 15. CLEAN ALL DRI5 FROM SITEY? ;ADJUs Ri51 TD -i 1 O p 3 E _-IBJID r—r / °� L t \ 1 Ar-' -fir — "?— .\ {l\ E•+ 3� 1 \ \ -- /,� .00,*+ ' '"'°"�: t { ?.» i ` + —-1-'+, i-- `- \ to HOURS OF OPERATION • }+ .- OBTAIN PERMISSON FROM AND �- \� "'ou� l i - + t ��" �a \ CONNECT TO KING COUNT/ONR - /� _ + - "i�:, �� ,, \ WITHIN NORMAL CITY OF RENTON CONSTRUCTION HCURS • tr W �e t \ \ METRO SEWER, SET NEW 48-6 r` f I :�`t .£ _= .. �;-- F L I '- , - LIKELY 9ETNEEN 7:00AM - B:OD PM. UNLESS SPECIFC PERMISSION o SSYH. INSTALL FLAP VALVE BETWEEN+ 1 r - i / \ r, a• °' 1- 7" ;�` 4 :� `\ IS GRANTED BY THE CITY OF RENTON INSPECTOR. OR. o @ METRO AND ON SITE SSMHifI � -, s '- '•'" "r -•;5�'.:�5` tib �, `\ i t- , ; '3® OBTAIN CITY AND METRO r -ice: ;,-. E ''� . ' \C \ rf�`� _ 1 • 1 t -TE „ OA$MEEI i -, "m APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION �+ � DUST, MUD, NOISE MITIGATION °�,:i \ _' .: ".r-"mod 6 n T - NAc� 1CA1.P i 1 s, �° ., -'M i$ y� '2 _-_-_-6:-.,' �'4f � SS1AN - p- i , _ - - IF GRADING AND COMPACTION ACTVInES ',;.?FATE UNACCEPTABLE _ \ \ _ - r% PROPOSEON `\ -�'_ \ \, ', r __ : LEVELS OF DUST, WETTING OF THE GROUND TALL BE UTUZED FOR OUST ac`a — — - ♦-f / i l\VA.I ENTERPRISE CAR `i` �� - + r - CONTROL MUD MALL BE CONTROLLED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF _ -_- - —... l �s", u.\ RENTAL AGENCY i •- _ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT PAO AND DAILY STRET CLEANING. i - --�� - - j '` ''�•�1 7\ \ PROPOSED (5040 SOFT). \ A 4f CONSTRUCTION NOISE WILL BE WITHIN NORMAL PARAMETERS FOR • L, 4• -Y - r / rs K\ 1 TURF SPACE •' \ �r DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL SITE ter"` r -EXISTING OVERHEAD PGWER / ./ ,4 "t j m i�j1 1 • .40 SO� �r i • °�w ;j.I - LANES TO 8E PLACEDANDERCRl iNR , V7\ \ 1 .. �, ' i - \ IN 10 FT WIDE EASIIF?7T/ / t y i ��. 1 � /ity � �,` \ 1 -- - s f _ PROPOSED ACCESS/HAUL ROUTES \p� \ p � �sM O r - ' CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AND REMOVAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL - _ NP t IS PROPOSED OFF OF GRADY WAY. IT IS LKEY THE�fCAVATED 11J7,4 " �� �rt • V?~�•� t \ MATERIAL WILL BE HAULED TO THE SOUTH NA GRADY WAY_AST ill �i 1 - �1� AND THEN HWY 167 SOUTH. GRAVEL FOR THE PIPE BEDDING. PAVEMENT \ r 2 - + AND BUILDING MATERIALS 1MLL SO LIKELY 9E BROUGHT FROM THE y SOUTH VIA HWY 167 NORTH AND THEN GRADY WAY WEST. THE SOURCE -' II �,*4 1 G "'ram}��j� - —' ON THE PROJECT SITE WILL ALSO p ��y-' �.� :� _ l i_ �� , ' �'\ a� OF M05-MATERIALS i0 6E USED �'�-- ���. s �' 7� ; '� • a to ti ��\ +! — — LIKELY BE FROM THE SOUTH. =1,` r yyo_: �3/4. IRRIGATION Doc ' ES-T-IMATEDEARTHWORK f�+ _ ��:% +$ s ' w 1 1• DOMES SER,OG2� r •• 1 C8 P3 11 p+'�- p1�� •\t uE .` GENERAL SITE GRADING FOR BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT • y ' ^I 1 1 2• hint 1 a TEE ♦ AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WALL GENERATE APPROXIMATELY \ ; 1' _ - /�� Nam`' OIH CI DIP .AND NEW FIRE HYDRANT e Q \ p - ...� AKE CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAIN 4000 CY EXCAVATION;3600 CY GRAVEL IMPORT AND 79 ii TELEPHONE RI APPROXIMATELY 735 CY OF TOP SOIL TO BE IMPORTED. i r- MTIi CITY. _ NATURAL GAS TT • '� �� 9 5-006� � _ ' ' ANY AREA OF THE SITE MUCH WILL NOT 3E WORKED -ELECTRICAL-POIFR- _ _�_ _1' �.• ON WITHIN IS DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION MUST BE D �` - - - _ - HYDROSEEOED AND VEGETATION MAINTAINED. La La I T♦ �L. + / , = OIL/WATER SEPARATOR #1 'o KITH EXTERIOR SHUTOFF Ir 6 3,0 \ +11`,�'I'I / —— ../. Py VALVE ARS CONNECT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES — / \ �_ Uu. 5 Pp�lDa - EAST-WEST TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND SUMMER 1998. y-`$-114 / OFFSTING SITE SUMMER�199 PROPOSED UTILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED UTH TRANSMISSION UNES TO BE RELOCATED - ' 3/4-DOMESTIC / ►A.... KEN M SPRING 1999. PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENT TO 8E ;.... RP DEVICE TO BE CONSTRUCTED SUMMER 1999. OCCUPANCY TARGETED FOR J // A - ;NSTALLED BETWEEN SERVICE AUGUST 1999. ' — ' METER AND BUILDING. CONNECTION TO EMSTINO-LAIN SY CITY 3 / OF RENTON. r • o \ , o GRAPHIC SCALE �� . -- 2 - - 1 INOI..50 FT. \ • Pierre-GradyWaySite Technical Information Report Developed Site Conditions - Figure 6 • 'aul Lumbert d Mike Dotso )through the use of"As-Built" record drawings. American Engineerin, C•rporation then performed field verification after meeting with the city for systems not clearly d•cumented in available city records. pon exiting thel subject site, drainage flows west through 189 lineal feet (LF) of 66-inch CMP culvert ( =0.47%)beneath Oakesdale Avenue SW. At this point, additional surface flow from approximately 9 400 SF (0.22 acre) of paved area is collected and added to the total conveyance volume. The 66-inc outfalls to la 20-foot wide by 40-foot long rip rap pad. The rip rap pad reduces flow velocity and erosion potential when surface flow from the 47-acre total basin joins the P-1 (Springbrook Creek) Drainage Channel. At this location in the channel, it appears the P-1 may convey surface water runoff from several thousand acres to its outfall near the Metro Renton Sewage Treatment Plant. There have b en no reports of recent flooding or overtopping of the P-I Channel at this location. Please note that r gional stormwater detention facilities have been constructed within the P-1 channel, and detention for t 's project sitei's included in those regional facilities. e following assumptions were used for offsite basin flow volume and modeling: No upst Team detention 25% landscaped surface cover at Cn 86 75% paved/impervious surface cover at Cn 98 Time of Concentration(Tc) calculated to point of inflow to subject site. .0 Detention and Water Quality though stormwater detention for this project site is provided in a downstream regional facility and n•''on- s to detention facilities are required, stormwater flows for existing and proposed Pierre-Grady Way site •onditions will he presented fo i general information. Flows have been calculated using the Santa Barb. a Urban Hydrograph(SBUH)Method and King County Rainfall Distribution Curves. The City of Renton normally requires that post-development stormwater flows exiting the site for the year, 10-year.and 100-year, 24 Ihour storms be limited to the pre-development 2-year, 10-year and 100 year 24-hour flows. Again, the detention storage volume required to meet these flow reduction standards i y g q d provided offsite. The Waterworks computer program was utilized to calculate the pre-and post- eveloped flows for the site foil informational and comparative purposes. The King County rainfall istribution curve is contained in Selection 6 USER1 in the WaterWorks rainfall distribution selection arameter. The following information was used in this analysis: Design Storm Rainfall Intensity 2-yr, 24-hr 2.0 inches/hour 10-yr, 24-hr 2.9 inches/hour 25-yr, 24-hr 3.4 inches/hour 100-yr,24-hr 3.9 inches/hour Soils Hydrologic Group "C" Runoff Curve Number "CN": Landscape/Grass 86 Pavement 98 L 4.1 Existing Conditions Information Onsite Total Area = 2.97 Acres (includes City land which drains onsite) Impervious Area = 0.0 Acre CN= 98 - Vegetated Area = 2.97 Acres CN= 86 Time of Concentration"Tc": = 13.32 minutes (See Appendix B) Offsite Area 1 Total Area = 4.63 Acres Impervious Area = 3.50 Acres CN= 98 Landscaped Area = 1.13 Acres CN= 86 Time of Concentration"Tc": = 16.95 minutes(See Appendix B) Offsite Area 2 Total Area = 12.60 Acres Impervious Area = 9.45 Acres CN= 98 • Landscaped Area = 3.15 Acres CN= 86 Time of Concentration"Tc": = 31.75 minutes(See Appendix B) Offsite Area 3 Total Area = 26.9 Acres Impervious Area = 20.2 Acres CN= 98 Landscaped Area = 6.7 Acres CN= 86 Time of Concentration"Tc": = 54.73 minutes (See Appendix B) Offsite Area 4 Total Area = 0.22 Acre Impervious Area = 0.22 Acre CN= 98 Time of Concentration"Tc": = 7.27 minutes (See Appendix B) 4.2 Existing Conditions Flow Results (See Appendix B for WaterWorks output) Onsite Flows (Entire Site) Design Stoim Existing-FlowRate 6-mo, 24-hr, 0.33 cfs 2-yr, 24-hr' 0.52 cfs 10-yr, 24-hr 1.07 cfs 100-yr, 24-hr 1.74 cfs Offsite Flows (For Capacity Verification,25- and 100-yr,24-hr) AREA 25 YR 100 YR Offsite Area:1 3.00 cfs 3.50 cfs Offsite Area 2 6.59 cfs 7.70 cfs - Offsite Area 3 11.16 cfs 13.05 cfs Offsite Area 4 0.23 cfs 0.26 cfs 4 3 Develo ed Conditions Information - evelopment of the Pierre Grady Way site is proposed in three phases. The Grade and Fill phase was c mpleted in the Fall of 1997. Rezone and Site Plan Approval is currently being sought. Upon Rezon d Site Plan Approval , application will be made for building and construction permits. e site development proposal includes a gas station/mini mart to be located on the southwest corner of the site d a car rental/sales business to be located on the most northerly parcel. The remainder of the site will eithe be p ved or landscaped. A preliminary site plan is included in this report as Figure 6,"Developed Site onditions." The estimated quantity of new impervious surface area under proposed developed conditions s proximately 91,040 sq. ft 2 09 acres),which is equal to approximately76percent of the 2.74 acre projec P Y ( ) q P j s te. 4.4 Developed Conditions Flow Results (See Appendix B for WaterWorks output) nsite Flows following Site Development Design Storm Developed Flow Rate 2-yr, 24-hr 1.09 cfs 10-yr, 24-hr 1.71 cfs 100-yr, 24-hr 2.41 cfs '__' .5 Detention System Information e purpose of stormwater dete tion storage is to alleviate downstream flooding and erosion which may res t from increased surface water flow attributable to the introduction of impervious surface areas. The 2.74-acre 4roject site location at the end of the drainage sub-basin suggests that detention storage may be ineffective. If site runoff were undetained following introduction of 76%impervious area,the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event ould equate to a sub-basin stonmwater flow increase of 0.67 cfs. It seems unlikely that this amount of flo crease would result in adverse downstream effects. Existing downstream conveyance systems have the apacity to receive this runoff and as previously mentioned, detention storage is provided downstream The ownstream storage facility was constructed as part of the Springbrook Creek relocation project. The deten 'on asin and pump system are located approximately one-quarter mile downstream. With this information,the City 1 f Renton determined that no onsite detention is required to be constructed as part of Pierre Grady Way at Qakesdale site development. Please note that the existing drainage easement granted over and across the su ject Site to the City of Renton also waives detention requirements for this site. (See Appendix A,Drainage Easement,Item I#13) This report provides technical substantiation for this waiver. 4.6 Water Quality)System Information It is the intent of the owner to provide surface water quality treatment for onsite surface water flows generated by areas subject to vehicular traffic. Design of the water quality facilities will be in conformance with Department of Ecology Stormwater Management for the Puget Sound Basin standards. The proposed site plan includes a gas station and a rental car/car sales facility which will include a vehicle wash room. Both the gas station and vehicle wash room present"water quality" challenges because they are subject to chemical and hydrocarbon exposure. If stormwater surface flow containing these pollutants is not properly collected and treated, potential adverse onsite and downstream water quality impacts could result. For these reasons, and in conformance with discussions held with City of Renton engineering staff, all surface flow from the gas station pump islands, underground fuel tanks and vehicle wash room will be collected in a cement concrete trench(detail shown on construction drawings), run through an oil/water separator, and then discharge to the sanitary sewer. An in-line shut-off valve will be placed at the outside of the oil water separator vaults for emergency shut-off purposes. Both the gas station pump island and the vehicle wash areas will be covered to minimize the collection of rainfall, since flow from these areas will dicharge to the sanitary sewer. The vehicle wash room is proposed to be a room integral to the rental car building, approximately 20 ft x 20 ft in size, into which vehicles will be driven and washed by hand using a standard garden hose. The room will be equipped with a central drain that discharges to the sanitary sewer as described above. i Total 90,740 square feet of proposed new impervious surface area includes; 11,680 sf building rooftops 3,850 sf pump island canopy and fuel tanks 400 sf covered vehicle wash area(overlaps pavement) 75,210 sf pavement The surface flow from building rooftops will be collected and conveyed directly to the enclosed twin 48 inch diameter storm drainage system. Surface flow from the pump island,fuel tanks and vehicle wash area will be - - collect treated and discharged to the sanitarysewer. Surface flow generated on 68,000 sf of paved area will collected, , g be collected and receive water quality treatment in grass-lined swales to be constructed adjacent to SW Grady Way. Swale#1 (most easterly)will be designed for surface flow water quality treatment from approximately 15,000 sf of paved surface.. Swale#2 will be designed for surface flow water quality treatment from approximately 53,070 sf of paved surface. Surface flow from 7,200 sf of proposed pavement near the mini mart which cannot be collected and conveyed to proposed Swale#1 or#2, will be collected and conveyed to the existing stormwater vault which outfalls to the existing grass-lined gabion-walled swale near the west property line. , _ S ale# 1 Design Information(Please See Appendix B for Water Quality Swale Design Calculations) 6 month 24 hr water quality flow cfs 100 yr-24 hr flow c Swale bottom width t Swale depth(with 1 foot minimum freeboard) eet 6 mo flow depth feet 100 yr flow depth et ale#2 Design Information(Please See Appendix B for Water Quality Swale Design Calculations) 6 month 1 24 hr water quality flow cfs 100 yr-24 hr flow fs Swale bottom width feet Swale depth(with 1 foot minimum freeboard) feet 6 mo flow depth eet 100 yr flow depth Ieet .0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design tormwater con\'eyance facilities installed in 1997 were sized per City of Renton standards to convey both ,e ffsite and onite surface water flows through the subject property. Normal design parameters indicate that ulverts should be sized at a minimum to convey the 25-year,24-hour event. The pipe and surrounding system ould then be aiialyzed for flooding during the 100-year, 24-hour event. No flooding of public streets is lowed. Some unite surface ponding occurring as the result of the 100-year,24-hour rainfall event is allowed y the City,but Ls reviewed and approved or denied on a case-by-case basis. conveyance system sized for surface water flow from both on-and offsite developed conditions during a 100- Year,24-hour storm event will be designed and constructed on the Pierce Grady Way site. The total flow which ust be conveyed is as follows : Offsite Area 1 100-yr,24-hr 3.50 cfs Offsite Area 2 100-yr,24-hr 7.70 cfs Offsite Area 3 100-yr, 24-hr 13.05 cfs Offsite Area 4 100-yr,24-hr - 0.26 cfs Onsite Developedd 100-yr, 24-hr 2.41 cfs Total 100-year,24-hour flow to convey 27 CFS single 48-incl l diameter CMP culvert sloped at 0.005 ft/ft,under inlet control,with headwall type entrance has a apacity of 40 cubic feet per second(CFS)flowing two-thirds full,which is more than adequate for the calculated 100- ear,24-hour flow conveyance requirement with no overtopping. Existing stormwater conveyance facilities which ow onto the site are twin(2)48-inch diameter CMP culverts (total flowing two-thirds full capacity of 70 7S). The ownstream existing 66-inch CMP inlet control,projecting entrance has a flowing two-thirds full capacity about 80 i FS. Both the existing upstream and downstream systems appear to be greatly oversized. It is assumedt the ditional storage available exists for flood storage. For system consistency, as part of the filling and grading activities, e owner continued the existing twin(2)48-inch diameter CMP culverts through the site to provide a two-thirds full apacity total of80 CFS matching that of the downstream system.. 6.0 Special Reports and Studies Five reports have been prepared relating to the Pierre Grady Way project site in addition to this Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation American Engineering Corporation April 1997 Grading and Fill Close-Out Report American Engineering Corporation February 1998 Environmental Assessment Environmental Hazards Control September 1996 Wetland Verification Report John Comis Associates September 1996 Storm Drainage Technical Information American Engineering Corporation . April 1997 Report The Geotechnical Engineering Investigation report makes recommendations with respect to existing soil properties,placement of fill material on the site, and foundation and slab design parameters. The Grading and Fill Close-Out Report indicates that fill was placed on the project site and includes material testing information. The Environmental Site Assessment was prepared to address subsurface investigations at and in the near vicinity of the old railroad grade. No Environmental Hazards were identified on the subject site. The Wetlands Report was prepared by a wetlands]specialist to verify the presence or absence of wetlands on or within 100 feet of the J subject site. No regulated jurisdictional wetlands occur within the specified study area. These reports were previously submitted to the City of Renton with the Grade and Fill Permit application. 7.0 Basin and Community Planning Areas The project site is located in:City of Renton Grid Section 4324 NE 1/4. The City of Renton has an extensive set of as-built records pertaining to water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems that utilize this grid system. This site is entirely contained within the Black River Drainage Basin. The Pierre Grady Way site is located within the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Employment Area-Valley (EATS designation. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mixture of commercial,office and uses. The proposedgas station and auto rental/sales uses fall within the range of uses indicated for the industrialp p EAV designation. 8.0 Other Permits To the best of our knowledge,the following permits/actions are required for development of this site: Rezone SEPA Determination for Rezone and Site Plan Approval Site Plan Approval Engineering Plan Approval Construction Permits-Utilities and Sitework Building Permits 9.0 Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1 rosion and sediment control during site filling,grading and construction will be accomplished through the use qf Best Management Practices BMP's as outlined in the"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin," (SWM). It is likely the BMP's will include the installation of silt fencing at the site perimeter,stabilizing exposed soils and revegetating the site as soon as practicable upon completion of grading. It is proposed that the glter fabric fencing remain in place and be maintained until site development activities including landscaping ave been complleted. Erosion and sedimentation control measures also include provision for the cleaning of city streets if they become dirty as a result of construction activities. The contractor will be required to wash an d or - sweep City streets on a regular basis throughout sitework and building construction. This will minimize siltation iri downstream facilities. Please refer to civil drawing sheet 2 of 11 for proposed Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control. 0.0 Operation and Maintenance 1 The manner in which project related drainage facilities will be maintained is described in table form in Appendix C,"Operation and Maintenance BMPs." i ' - i i • . ' I Appendix A Existing City of Renton Drainage Easement . I - ::: • . : .:r..,...-.L;7.7.(' •.-•::.-• . .: . • l• ,::•":-:"—-'ft- •. .. . . . . . • ,.,......% .t• ^:y •�: :.;...,,.i..::-..,...:.:.:-:.. ., . • . .arm. ... • . . '�' . . . . . • . . • 6.00�rrET.' „_:: . .. . . '•`` . • AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE • r `° THIS[ AGREEMENT made. this _Leos day of M•, r 1985; ' '•' between P1UGET WESTERN, INC.: a Washington corporation ("Puget . Western" herein), and CITY OF RENTON, ("Grantee" herein); 1 • • : •• j WHEREAS, Puget Western is the owner of a parcel of land in . the N.E. 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, • W.M., King County, Washington; and . WHEREAS, Grantee desires an easement for a drainage channel - g' • across Puget Western's land at a location more specifically . ! described herein below; .. • } (' NOWITHEREFORE, in consideration' of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and • IN. other good and valuable consideration in hand paid receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the performance by Grantee of the covenants, terms and conditions 'a,� . ` hereinafter set forth, Puget Western hereby grants, conveys_ and C- II! r'• ari ;? quitclaims to Grantee the following easement: e • �` I �. A. • A 'nonexclusive perpetual easement across, along, in, • `f pp upon and under that portion of Puget Western's land described in ^�� �•` i Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part 11 hereof, for the purpose of .installing, constructing, operating, • ,. v ii: maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a drainage • ': channel with all connections and _ederground appurtenances 1. A7 ie LLB f thereto (Therein the "drainage channel") , together with the cx • J• I. ! nonexclusive richt of ingress to and egress from said portion of i. . I' - _ V ( . I Puget Western's land for the foregoing purposes; . \l • 1 The terms "Easement" and "Easement Area" in this instrument . 0� ( refer to the easement on the property described in Exhibit "A". . . ' . ' ,II ! This Easement is granted subject to and conditioned upon the f I ; following terms, conditions and covenants which Grantee hereby , f ' j promises to faithfully and fully observe and perform. F. II , ! : • . ! 1. Cost of Construction. and Maintenance. Grantee shall w bear and promptly pay all costs and expenses of construction and ' - ! 1 1 maintenance of the drainage channel. f •� j 2. Compliance with Laws and Rules. The Grantee shall i ; • 'construct, maintain and use the drainage channel in accordance :. 1 • with any statute, order, rule or regulation of any public • 1 i authority having jurisdiction. 3. Use of the Easement Area by Puget Western. Puget;: ' E Western deserves the right to develop and use the land ;: • encumbered 'iby this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with . the.rightslgranted herein. Puget Western reserves the right to I , construct improvements, such 3s buildings, parking and " landscapiing, over portions of the Easement Area upon securing the consent cf Grantee, which consent Grantee agrees shall not be unreasonably withheld, having clue regard to Grantee's facilities. i In no event shall Puget Western be allowed to construct a • . 1 building let grade over the box culvert. . Pugeit 'Western shall not be liable for any loss or damages to ` Grantee's facilities resulting from Puget Western's use of the t-16•1 lands encumbered by this easement unless such loss or damage is • i ! �I due to negligent acts or omissions of Puget Western. Puget Co, Western grees to use reasonable care. 4. Termination for Cessation of Use. In the event Grantee ( �..,. ceases to use the drainage channel for its intended use for a + i t MC period of five (5) successive years, this.Agreement •and all' ' ! _Grantee's rights hereunder shall terminate and revert to Puget ' • . , .. .. ... '.. . 1: . ! • Western. Release of Drainage Channel on Termination. No '+ •• i • E -qgnin5.ation of to s Agreement shall release Grantee from any ..y. .. ts.. bility or obligation with ros�pect_to.any matter occurring•'•:•'.• • - r. cr.; 5S% "i� :.)1M-6023 32185 �s . . ` C, a111.14 ./_ ,.::;;rly 1 n r" prior to suchtermination, ' ., • .e • termi;a , nor shall such termination release ,ilf;.:•• C . ::1:�;�• • . Grantee from its obligation and liability to remove the drainage .4.:`%--W -•. -" channel cyan facilities from Puget Western's parcel and restore the ) ",3 ;'�' ground. �n•,it '-'-' : . . - 6. Removall of Drainaoe Channel on Termination. Upon any ' ' .' • .i .......•':';�. .. '-••• . ' termination of 'this Agreement, Grantee shall promptly remove from :r`1,,•-: the Easement Area the drainage channel facilities and restore the . ground' to the condition now existing or, in the alternative, take such other mutually agreeable measures to minimize the impact of I , the drainage channel on Puget Western's Property. Such work, 1 removal and restoration shall be done at the sole cost and ' _ • , _ '• 'expense of Grantee and in a manner satisfactory to Puget Western. i^` - In case of failure of Grantee to so remove the drainage channel • facilities, restore the grcurd or take such ocher mutually agreed • ) s" upon measures, Puget Western may, after reasonable notice to . -01 Grantee. remove' the drainage channel facilities, restore the .".'•' ' �w ;. ' • • ground or take such measures at the expense of Grantee, and Puget Western shall not be liable therefor. ,{ • _%=:: :'�I 7. Third Party Rights. Puget Western reserves all rights Yr 4' with respect toji.ts property including, without limitation, the i right to grant easements, licenses and permits to others subject • ✓_r;I 17 to the rights granted in this Agreement. 4 17 • "' CDd 8. Release and Indemnity. Grantee does hereby release, 1 • • ''+ . sa, a7 indemnify and promise to defend and save harmless Puget Western CD and against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, U„ expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorney's feesl.ncurred for Puget Western in defense thereof, - ; . '"' • asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out -' .. • ' ` • a of (1) acts or omissions of Grantee and Grantee's servants. 1 • - • •= ' � 4 . agents, employees, and contractors in the exercise of the rights • i granted herein, :or (2) acts and omissions of Puget Western in its • : ;",, 11; use of the Property which affect Grantee's employees, agents, contractors, and other parties benefiting from said drainage channel: provided, however, this paragraph does not purport to indemnify PugetlWestern against liability for damages arisirg out • --t.;.,i' 1I. of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or f1 ; resulting from the sole negligence of Puget Western or Puget • '' `fit r Western's agents or employees. ..:- { 9. Title. The rights granted herein are subject to permits, leases,1 licenses and easements, if any, heretofore .. - ' •:t granted by Puget Western affecting the property subject to this :. - Agreement. Puget Western does not warrant title to its property ' • and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. • i;,( 10. Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, notices as _ 'i required to he in writing under this Agreement shall be given ' =?.? I:I: •• .follows: : ::, • If to Puget Western: Puget Western, Inc. - �;, P.O. Box 0868 ' • Bellevue, Washin ton 98009-9734 I 4 ., If to Grantee: City of Renton• +__•= / r' i 200 Mill Avenue South • • Z:::.:•' i : Renton, WA 98055 +=.`• / 1• Attn: Director Public Works • ' • Notices shall be deemed effective, if mailed, upon the r' :! •• second day following deposit thereof in the United States Mail, .4`' • ' postage prepaid,icertified or registered mail, return receipt • requested, or upon delivery thereof if otherwise given. Either party may change the address to which notices may be given by i .giving notice ash above provided. =� . Successors. the rights and obligations of the parties :6 .•'' unall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. _ • . -2- AM-5023 3 I85 1 .7r..s..:.!:' D. -. 1 f }• .1:: • 1 �, .,:N•rr 1 . . • a ..-,-,1,,,...i.,.-.. .,.-....:;!:.,. •,..,..;... • ... ... ..,... _• •. . .. . ... .,.,... .„.....,....„...f.....,:,..... ... • , ••;•:=1,..,:r.,,- ;,,..::.-4.4.:.-..:;ti.,..,:zzi .-.:;.--iii.r.,:,.•...:.,. -•:,.. : . . • • • . • ••••••••',...V•!•1.••..-•.:4•..:-,.• • • 1 •7.;:!iN.Fii'q.. 4si.:.:'.7•1-'::.:TAZt.::*" :_ .....:.:..\, • • • .:-..•...•••...':-..'•••‘.:-r:i...•4- 4 4.q....: {• ..•ivr,ror..z....::,-;.!•'::-.-.... a.,-..*„.......,•/,•....:..i..7.'. ......:•:,..••••:,...:.••.... ' .:::.:•:.: '.•. .......... , IN - .:.•!..c:sv.,.•;•?,::,.;..:;..! :,.•••••'''. •;.,..••••7•1'.2:7P''' .. ... . .. •• i -•..*.tV.• '!...* • it•f;.%11:1::,:.it......%•.;.:•7.• '4C-t.....4. a.'.• ..• . • . •:.:.:;;;;;;•;..;::_t:.•?..:::...:!:•.:.!;.:.:•:.•••.:.::::,,:;:y;'••. . ' . •-,.....rf.,,:-. • :•-•.-;. : ,:`' ' l'-'4:5-,;;';••••=;'::: ••••:,•••.•-;.-•;.t.',4!i•."- , •.• - 1 • • ; :.,:•!,,,.. :1:7::::-.....- :-.:;4::5"'-'-..':..-.- . • 12. Liability. In the event of any assignment of the - ••q11-4":"-It-':':-.''':.::.1-- "-- ,r.-.:::2,-,7w7:... ----. rights hereunder, the liability of Grantee and its assignees 4 - ....0.: 1::.:!'".- :',...1„, :''':,.... • shall be joint and several. . . • • ,.....21 ....,........,,:., • • • - - ;I : :,--:::- ..',•.;-, -7- -: . - ,. . 13. Release of Drainage Retention Regyirements. ..trantee ':-. . •:- ... .... •..% '-: . shall release Puget Western from future drainage retent.on, - .-- - . . • . compensating storage and flood plain requirements and/or • . . • • • •• •• , • .. ...: . • restrictions as related to Puget Western's adjacent property. . . .. • .' "2. . • EXECUTED as of the date hereinabove set forth. . .. . . • • • . . 1 . ' " - • . • • ' ACCEPTED: . . N • : '-'. • li , CITY OF RENTON PUGET WESTERN, INC. . . ...... - .- - • ... - • . •:*.•: .:::-.. .:::;4. : •r• - ••• • ' • By (3...a.44-...e , -..,.. ..& .. • . BY . ... .-7...",... ..,(",./ .....? • Vice President ‘ , . • . . . ; •. . • . ' i -:. "'.',"*.*•.:'...? . . •• • - • , .:-.:.••::':•• ' . . . ... . ' • ••• • • : •• - • • • ....., • i ' • • . - . 4 .• , ..........,, . . • • • ! . . . __ ...•... ..• . •. • l'.-:1. • • I - •-- • - • A STATE OF WASHINGTON) . F. •1 •- IC 1 ) SS. - . . •• • . . 1 O _COUNTY OF KING ) • • fr CI . In . . On this ‘1,:' day of 1#141g - , 1985, before me, the . ••• .. . • .• I'; • cm undersigned, personally appeared WM. K. ARTHUR, to me known to be - - % . - - • $ • . • :i.,.• • • • • I; W5 CD the Vice President of PUGET WESTERN, INC., the corporation that . . i ..- executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said • $ • . - ._ . -.•.--.. 11 ' . .instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said • ' 1 - . • • •• ' li ' corporation,Ifor the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on . . i . • • '. • I • . 'oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. • r . .. .1 _, . . • .. ' -1 I • . . WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and ' r • . ; _ • . ' 1 year above written. . 4 . . • • . • . • • 1 . , •. . . . . _ 1)6.4 i. • • • _ . . - Notary Public and for Otetate of __ • -. $ , re • .::kg V • • Washington, re ding at • ; .- tk' . ' • .• .. I 1 • . . • 4 . i . . , . . • . •.. I 1 . tt• . • ..S.V. Z.drii, • • • • . - •.. • .,----. .,- I I car .. . cwiCi 7 rcaul• •-. • ,•• ,:. ..- . .' i • !_ • • . . . I ; . .. . . • ; r . g • g . . • - • I . . • . . i F•- . • • . . . ' . 1 i• . •- . . - • • 1 : •---- , . , . „. • •• g • f ' • . . • .• I 1 . I . .• ) i . .--- .. • ... • ' ' ' • , • . • ! . --,' •. " •' • -3- • . • ,--- •-•:' •••••••••••• • - I • - AM-6023 32185 '..- • . , ..v. . . • -. • ''d•-.!•••• :.- • • .:•- • ::e'"...f - • • • •. . '--7;t... ..::-.;:. .., • . . •i...;,.v•-,:-...7.:,.. ...- 1... • • - -••• • -- • ••- . . - -.-— i7N, 1 , ‘• j I i• /• , 1 ', 1 •,•;41....'•,.:::;..ci*,::•..••••::•-•••••:,:...:-. ..,••••••,...1.•••• ..• . . . • •- . . :%-..•:••••••'...::::1,,;:•-•!-•.•.:.•••••••••,."-:•;:j.-.-••..•:•• ;••.••:* •• . . - . • • . •: .• ,• .••;•:•:i•-1::'....:1:::;.'...1.,:.••.•'...•,•• :. .. . _ . .. . .... , ... ..... . . ... • ( .. ...........-.:.•••••:-............,6:....0•"'::...•,:.•:,-;,,,.N.....48•-f.14--• _ .• • • •, . ...• • .. .,..• • ..... ?:•••:,q:::•••• !•••:''.1'.:•.f% ...'.•• - :?...0:•;;••••••••. • • i•. • . - • . •••••;•••,::.!•'1,•:. -::i••:.7.. InZI.:,.t . 1;‘ •• • • •::i ., .-•,....;..:.•4,.•:::'.:,:.:•1. _ '1,V:f::;•• `.•;•,:• ..??. .. 31' •". • • . :..••••::::: ••'.-•••:•*::'"'::;•,..... , .•-;.:.... .•- : ••' .. ....; ••:.•"•.,:f.,•'.-4;:A.. ' . . . . . - ;:t••.-...7.-I!. ;•••••'-k ••-c": . . • . . . • :; • . • ..•. :---.:-:..:,::..........-.,%-;.....:,. - • • • . .... . ... . . • . •-••••• . . • . • •:•..,....„,•:,. :• •:.,:. . . . . . .. •:•,..::-...: , ..•,..:,:.7.. ....•7g, • .. . . . . - .. ,.. • . . : ""EXHIBIT A •• • - ••• —,--: ... . . . - • : . . ...., ..., Legal for permanent drainage easement - Puget Western - Tax • - - -. : o: • . Parcel 4. , ' • ' -.. • . I • . . ...,.. ii- ' ,':;•• : :1g . i .. • • • • • • . • :.- A parcel of land being 100 feet in width being 50 feet on each ! • .. t __, . • . . side of the following described centerline and its northerly ?.• and southerly extensions all within Section 24, Township 23 , . .. „ ....... • .. • ••.. •.. . . , _ • ,. • . • North, Range 4 East, W.U., • . • 1 •••••••••••• ..-..:-....;-.7:::':.... .' . . Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the Southwest .. •.. ..• -, •• / ! • . .- . • quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section with the northerly along .15 right of way line of SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly ..it . •••... . , . . .... ' said northerly right of way line a distance of 312.09 feet to .. •• • - • the True Point of Beginning of said centerline, thence North • I .. ''. '• •- -..- 33°20' West la distance of 138 feet more or less to Puget Sound 1 _ Power lc Light Company's southerly right of way line and the 1 • .••.• . • • . terminus of said centerline; , •• ' • .•.... r••• - • • co TOGETHER WITH a parcel of land 120 feet in width being 60 feet • 1 • . . • . i • gy on each side of the following described centerline and its northerly t . •• • ;: . . •. • <75 and southerly extensions all within Section 24, Township 2Z gNorth, Range 4 East, W.2., • . . ..-".:. . • . 1 ,0 1. 1 . Beginning ai the intersection of the East line of the Southwest t 10.• quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section with the southerly i • • • . right of way line of SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly along . i . said•southerly right of way line a distance of 249.57 feet to • • . . _ - • 1 the True Point of Beginning of said centerline; thence South i . - ••• , 33°20' Eastdistance o ia f 150 feet more or less to the northerly • . .. 1 , • ' • right of way line of S.R. 405 and the terminus of said centerline; . • . . • . • • . ••• I I :- . . TOGETHER WITH a trangular shaped .parcel of land lying northwesterly : • , . . , . •• 11 •• of the following described line; •; , . . . . . • de ; .• • .-,,..- . . . .. • F. •. . Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the Southwest ' . . • • ,_ *. • -.. 1 • quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 • : • . • North, Range 4 East with the northerly right of way line of . , •• •. 4.: . SW Grady Way; thence southwesterly along said northerly right • • 1 1 r'. of way linela distance of 261.27 feet to the easterly margin . • • . . . . - • • of the previously described 100 foot easement; thence North . . • • • 3320' West'along said easterly margin a distahce of 76.73 feet •• . • • 1 1 to the Point of Beginning of said line; thence northeasterly . ly .1 • , 1 • . to a point on Puget Sound Power & Light Company's southerly l• right of way and the terminus of said line; said point bears • . . • t • South 75°47! West a distance of 265.0 feet from the intersection . • • • of said southerly right of way line and the East line -of the • • • Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 24. •• . . . . • ,.. ' In City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • 1 • . • - . • _ -, .. . . . 1 . • . . '. . . . . . • • . . • • , - • . . - . • • . ..•• - • • . . i .• .. . .: .. . . - • .. • . . . - • • • , . • • ' • • 1 . .-- • ' : • .-.-.. , • , . • • . . . • . . • . Riot i .1 . ••-..:••••,f:.::,:. . . . . 4 •i . .- ..]:',;-:• ... - • • •• - - .- , . .. ., • . . . ...-- , . ... . . . • . .... . • . •. . •.• .-..• .-.. . • ,.... • ...rc7. . . • 1 . ,-- , ‘i/ , 1 DATIN RAGE-1— M/R um.OwIl• I RA IT 2 I mire n. II In RECORD OF ► 11_R•VEY „ • NE 1/4 8EC24-TWP23N-R4Ef W.M. LEGEND • •yNara Waif Rn+l PFIII TM/CL MITE . + f »i.Ir . I•"�' ,1 fpe DETAIL ' ' 44p me amyl Iw w.Yy 'VVOR ' T ••Tlo1 • „I • in 40 .. • us I U A1•R4I ItlrON IC • n .. un I7 R I rL M SIIJLII/YJ\ 1)111, FI,M'm'no"" wI • El`CRDAG+ENT tl. i♦ 1" a"IA•iim•'YiFwe vai ,i.tlTAl/ •S. • • •• ri •4 �ItA`.� I`I , • ev..o u a .4 . o PARCEL A • MI .r�� �� ` iam,........----"...".°._..-_.,----------4--"r111V di • . . 5Y1 PARCEL p IRto Y, \,�f Pl � • a l /�i' EOJIPMENT USED ' off? ' ,, , .. falq CRAFT+cSCALE -a \\ / � P ..To mIa ..' �i ,i,l IIOLNVIO. WASELL AND ASSOCIATES. .'t %� • ..`' _ LAID adar•TIDe I I../■IleirgtiD•e•D►roltT DASISa /IRM rn o.S.. •n•caa draw.e ay. w e� a a. . ... o• - i gilii i•21ir.aa Nr•y� •w. • + • •R • ��.14 RECO-Urn CERTF/CATE , nib • n..••+w p_n.Irma.ws•a_w �f-a••.w••....•nT after T..•...•r...-.E �r IILIZ is rim. r •�YMa...w caw.P Q.I.wna.NAaw•M•r.••nta • iG . A•aU• r•.•t,fer.wwq �•PO Y to a.w Rqf KT.ON IC �� ow-- wa•-r Iwo '.-rbiIlL T ■.gyp_ I:044 _ 41 .. A QYm • . �'."' -T—.-'e ww.w nVR C 1a/NO'•LL AI..r- 4o•�I��L4'*-�L • • • y __ 17722 • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS • 1 9�g�►q�$ . r..r./. ..._..— qn ...... 1.Y\t. MIL R. 1V 77,17S11: n i ai Ie' rai" f:Mal a' ltar `a F.F.. .141Y�bl I��p!�(p.�"t• Ib�a'' •�`7J aSa.. \I nL 1 4 I .ru i'"•" - z'v` — I N.•...e.1.ewew r M n.•..w .v/I / p•r��•�{ 11p1 11.7 •Tl. oi, n{ixPt rtnn. r..- .. Et • oel 1 fbi nIM .n . .I"bl � „{�'lj.G n1.lig n•Fi I�sl .. . . .S havoc,rwl wM wlws • 101/11140P1711Egjefren" n M 1L�Iwlo�121".r Iw aw•""d MF ,J/ 11/14151 N LIM1 Petit ••Ul a • !�j'� �,.� v IZ'�i�I�m�al(i�l•I�I�i�g11t{Iti � 11 w11..y�^ •IA• I.l •drll••,11..�.'�•plj�-rM. n.^n • W• !Ilb�rajt.r mrau. ��� r.�•. wK7.a'f i.�78%YI t1� in r F :'l i w..e1 . [I'T111margoir mfn. orM.r.....t. d1.1�'r.1':1ry."1.3�lr� .. f� a I ' ,16,.."Srar:Prni Pr. MiliAle12.-S411 1� 1Wd.ol�ilY . .gyp® • ! �iC.IbI�Mq1,. en Iry 1 ynype�y� vi It •r• tj.�• rm.: �1 r •r111�r 111•.ff nine(dbl.", El. r 1}•� L ' ' nH9�.�r .; • .'' .'!�a« r.w... 'r 'r. SI il <.r. .Fp t�tttm,. 1 • 'k ' ' a1>t'ati1I.' j ' .N1�1'.:Illlr�tll!u�'+-11 1r�• q 1• 1� • 1�ELL l®1d IF0011 MAI 1••LI}ILft • • ' \ • • • • • • 11OL►tV10. WADELL AND ADDOCIATta • H` , v 11 LAND reMMR n 11e/ .11elne/•1 � no 1edalie •e7/0/17 en won ltw A ma t...n.earesw.—Ir.•./ ......... • HEco uPto cERTr ICA TE amEw+s WUr1GTE nr-sa_ n w.a....,n...I...A Y =r. N•....r•a l wn.l•.1 a u..e..o ww r was w • w• ti1F�16IIRt_ r • dt.a lld..w..O w•e te...•e•r r •.•e.• •YIN ..� wens in .towel/. R1 w.. en r'WI'PCM"PC r��' awn.•n/•w•1 • • -�—--- —-- -- - - — -- - -- 1- - — — - - --- '--- — - r '- - --- —- - --- 0 . C-`1CQ170 • • I • 0 - ' JYi Kr. j . ', '1u . ••1.:1:4 . AI ,i` - EXHIBIT•A' _ • ____ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • - That portion,of Lot 12 and Tract 11 of Washington Technical Cancer. • ' according co the plat thereof recorded In volume 122 of Plats. pages 90 through 102. inclusive. In Xing County. Wasnington. ants particularly described as follow/2 That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 24. Township 23 ._ North. .Range a Canc. M.H., ld Xing County. Washington. described as follows: Cemeaneing at chs,erchease corner of the south 40 feet of Section 13, chance north 21.12.00• west along the north line of the south 40 feet, a distance cif aSA.73 fist. more or lees, co ens wee floe of Powell Avenue southmesc. being eh.northwest corner of Earlingeon - •. Ind'iitrial Park Number 2, according to ch. plat thereof recorded in • Volume 00 of Plat . page 00, In Xing County. Washington: i chance Boucle 1•14'I20• west along the west line of said Earlington Industrial Per%Number 2 and its prolongation thereof 1.a10 Lest. sore or lass, CO Sne southerly line of ehe 100 foot Northern Pacific ' • Railway right.of-way (now iurlingeon Northern. Inc.): - ' thence southwesterly along said right.of-coy a distance of 122.42 . feet co Che TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: • chines continuing•ouchwesceriy along Raid rlght.of-way a distance • . of 310 feet; h w thence. ochre 12.32.10• it a distance of 120 feet; !___I thence no.thsastsrly parallel to che southerly line of said rignc-of-way a distance of 310 feet, more or tan. to a point which • bears north 12.32'30. wet of the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; • thence south 12•12'30• east a distance of 120 Conc, more or less, Co - the TRUE POINT or BEGINNING: y (SLING a portion of Lac 3 of Xing County Let Line Adluetment No. e04.6) recorded under Recording Number 13013020011. • ' PARCEL Be i • A scrip of land immediately Boucle of and adjoining the right-cit.-ay i of one Renton branch of the tbrthern Pacific►iilway. said strip being are Gully described as follow.. co-wit. Beginning at the point of 1 f the south marginal line of ' LL the rignc-ot-way of cM Onion branch of :he Northern Pacific _ Rai:rey with Cla oust line of the •outhnst quarter of the northeast quarter Pf Dotson 24. Township 23 North. Range 4 G.G. w,N.. In . Xing County, wesnl:gcon. +filch bears south 0•22'30. east 224.1 feet from the northwest _Omar Of CM •ouchessc quarter OL CM northeast - ' I • qu f maid 2ection 2U thence south 2.12'10' east 1311.78 feet to a point; then. norm 74.13• emit 133 feet from and parellei co the south . 1. marginal line mf GM rigtt•of'ray of said R.ncon branch of CM Porthern Pacific Railway, 1.115.27 feet co a point on the east line•' of said Section 24s chance north 0•22' wet 131.71 fret Co the lnteriortion of the ant f line of said Section 24 with CM south narginal line of the ., right-of-way of raid Winton branch of the Northern Pacific Railway. which Bald polntl of lnc.[.ictlon lies IPe feet pouch 0.22' lest from J. � �' CM nbr ChgeG corner oL ehe southeast sct quarter of C noetMaee `� quartet 7f said !action ter thence following maid south marginal line of tn. rlght•of•w.y of the R_nten bronco of the Northern Peclfic Railway.ouch 76•13• west 1.364.a finet co helplmag of beginning; i ,. EXCEPT chic portion thereof lying ly of the westerly line of • Lowell Av.nu. SOUChwesc a. conveyed to the City of Renton by Quit •• Claim heed recorded under Recording mower 1 • 1 ! IRCINO• portion of Cat 3 of King County Lot Line Adtustment No. eel•.7 recorded.d underlag number 1. yII f Initials�� 1 l . s '}'/ L. C • • t 'ems ' • \y. _, , r i1. . y . EXHIBIT'A'(Continued) PARCEL C: _ That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North. Range 4 East, N.M., in King County, - �„ Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said southwest quarter; . r:...'.. north 0.55'12° east alcng the west side. 348.27 fere to the - point of beginning of the tract of lane herein de•cri..d: j, thence north 77•29'12° east 438.59 feat to an intersection with the northerly margin of the Puget Sound Electric Railroad rlaht-of-wows • . . thence north y along said northerly margin an arc distance of - - 274.18 feet co a point of tangency, the radial line of which bears south 12•30.4e• ease for a distance of 741.82 feet to the radial center: • thence north 77.29'12• east along said northerly margin 672.76 feet • co the easterly line of said southwest quarter: thence north 0.45'23' ease along said ease line 25.69 feet co the southerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad tight-of-way: _ . thence south 77•29'12' west along said southerly margin 1.118.28 feet' co a point of curve, having a radius of 905.35 feet. the radial center of which bears south 12.30'48' east: thence south ly along said curve and south margin an arc distance of 261.61 feet to an intersection with the west line of . - ' • said southwest quarter: ' thence south 0.55'12° west 38.52 feet to the point of beginning: EXCEPT chat portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of - Oakeidale Avenue Southwest as conveyed co the City of Renton by deed ;• • ' recorded under Recording Hummer 8711020478. . PARGEL 0: ' A strip of Land 50 feet wide, being 2S feet in width on each side of ' a centerline of definite location of the Seacele-Tacoma Interurban -- Rai1'way (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) Renton branch, on. over. . • across and through that certain 10 acre tract of land along the northerly side of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and part of the norcheauc quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24 in Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.N.. in King County. ,, • Washington. and the southwest quarter of the norcheauc quarter of said Section 24, the centerline being more particularly described as . -- follows: - -Beginning ac the point of intersection of the centerline of the '--i definite location of the Renton branch of the Seattle-Tacoma Interurban Railway (now Puget Sound Electric Railway) with the south • line of the 10 acre tract described above which bear[ :ouch 29.41' west 264.7 feet from the center of Section 24. Township 23 North. - • -- Range 4 East, N.M., in King County, Washington: . - thence in a northeasterly direction as follows: - 1 L7 Curving to the left by a radius of 716.8 feet a distance of 274.3 • f'l feet to a point: N thence north 33•17' east 345 feet to a point: • thence curving co the right by a radius of 716.d feet, • distance of• '--- 9.4 536.6 feet to a point: r CM thence north 76•13' east 685.2 feet to a point on the east line of - •t _ . the!southwest q• f the northeast quarter of Section 24. ,... Township 23 North. Range 4 Ease. N.M., in King County, Washington, • ,/ v. which bears south 0.15' ease 607.5 :sec from the northeast corner of- .0 4 the'southwest quainter of the northeast q C Section 24, - „7 • • Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.N., in King County, Washington: 1' ,., EXCEPT chat portion thereof lying westerly of the easterly line of 'n oakesdale Avenue Southwest as conveyed co the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 071102047e. • -- PARCEL E: • a Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North. • Range 4 East. N.M., in King County. Washington. which is south • 0.15'30' ease 633.21 feet from the northeast corner of the southwest ? -.4 quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 24: . • • thence on a course south 76.13' west along the south boundary line • of the Puget Sound Electric Raliwar's righc.of-way • distance of !117:89 feet, ,: ,_ chance on a course south 13.47' seat a distance of 19 feet: thence on a course north 76.1]' east a distance of 113.32 feet, thence on • course north 0.11'10° west a distance of 19.54 feet to • env.point of beginning. • • • Initials 0 !- Powa4 • ' ' Initials _ 4 R,l .�t! ��.- w'� �•s:-. -^ia i'....,�'t.•,..-�i•�f. • ' ',?:.v .,uJ.' i1 • :'..'.,.,,��i�i• "'. - 'thki:'i7:;►': /.-r_":�3. •. • . .n• fb' Nam.•. ,~.i•n .Gl.. (-: Y '..}_3. :"';� \ -' 1 • .. 1. • L r a rn73 I • T 1 ' I y V I 73 :-... frl E > ' { r - 1 g . P .I Q TT ter'' - -'1 M \ ' -9 _ .- r i. _ \ . ,,, • 4 . ......__,, , i \ I , • _., . , r ` —' \it 1810_ME0l ,S 1'14'11' 1814.12 (MI5 1_q7 1'�\ rg I .., , . P ' • 16 ;�, ,,,„ ,-.\ 0\ i • , , ,r , ,,; �� . ib.). 1 G,QRTW TIr7GIT Q .' Q.GT __. - _... -. cidM -,' s, _ nT aF-�T - aS 1 I i I Appendix B Waterworks Calculation Sheets _1 I 5/28/98 American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE EXISTING STORMWATER FLOWS CLG BASIN SUMMARY �l BASIN ID: EX10 NAME: EXISTING ONSITE 10 YR-24 HR , SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2 . 97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA I PRECIPITATION 2.90 inches AREA. . : 2.97 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86. 00 - TIME OF CONC 13 . 32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF 0.20 AREA. . : 0. 00 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70. 00 ns:0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s:0.0600 _ TcReach - Channel L: 570. 00 kc:17. 00 s: 0. 0070 TcReach - Channel L: 30. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0070 TcReach' - Channel L: 30.00 kc:17. 00 s: 0. 0070 - PEAK RATE: 1. 07 cfs VOL: 0. 39 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: EX100 NAME: EXISTING ONSITE 100 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs , RAINFALIJ TYPE l USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 2.97 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF CONC 13 . 32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA L ABSTRACTION COEFF 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70. 00 ns:0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0.0600 TcReach - Channel L: 570. 00 kc:17. 00 s: 0. 0070 TcReach - Channel L: 30. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0070 TcReach - Channel L: 30. 00 kc:17. 00 s: 0. 0070 PEAK RATE: 1.74 cfs VOL: 0. 61 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: EX2 NAME: ONSITE EXISTING 2 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY "TOTAL AREA • 2.97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2. 00 inches AREA. . :. 2 .97 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF1CONC • 13 .32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA - ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0. 00 Acres CN • 98.00 _ TcReach - Sheet L: 70. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0600 TcReach - Channel L: 570. 00 kc: 17 . 00 s: 0. 0070 TcReach - Channel L: 30.00 kc:21. 00 s: 0.0070 TcReach' - Channel L: 30.00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0. 0070 PEAK RATE: 0.52 cfs VOL: 0.21 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 5/28/98 I American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE DEVELOPED STORMWATER FLOWS CLG 1 , 1 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DV101 NAME: ONSITE DEVELOPED 10 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 • 2 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION ' • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0.88 Acres TIME INTERVAL : • 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF CONC 11.28 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 2 . 09 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 55. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 470. 00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 30. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 210. 00 kc: 17 . 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 50. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 1.71 cfs VOL: 0.58 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DV100 NAME: ONSITE DEVELOPED 100 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 1 • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0.88 Acres TIME INTERVAL ! • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 TIME OF CONC • 11. 28 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 2 . 09 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 55. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 470. 00 kc: 17 . 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 30. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 210. 00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 50. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 241 cfs VOL: 0.82 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DV2 I NAME: ONSITE DEVELOPED 2 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs 'RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION I • 2. 00 inches AREA. . : 0.88 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN 86. 00 TIME OF CONC • 11.28 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 2.09 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 55. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 470. 00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 30.00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 210. 00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 50. 00 kc:21. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 1. 09 cfs VOL: 0.37 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 1 3/27/97 American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE OFFSITE BASIN 1 FLOWS CLG BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 01100 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 1 100 YR-24 HR 1 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA { PRECIPITATION : 3.90 inches AREA. . : 1.13 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF CONC 16.95 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 3.50 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2. 00 s:0.0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 200. 00 ks:27. 00 s:0.0050 TcReach - Channel L: 500. 00 kc:42.00 s: 0.0050 PEAK RATE: 3 .50 cfs VOL: 1.30 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: 0125 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 1 25 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4. 63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 1.13 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF CONC c 16.95 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 3.50 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns:0. 1500 p2yr: 2. 00 s:0.0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 200. 00 ks:27. 00 s:0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 500.00 kc:42.00 s:0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 3 . 00 cfs VOL: 1.11 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min �LL - � I 3/27/97 American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE OFFSITE BASIN 2 FLOWS CLG BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 021001 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 2 100 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA. . . . .;. . : 12. 60 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE. . . . : USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION. .,. . : 3.90 inches AREA. . : 3 . 15 Acres TIME INTERVAL. .. . : 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 TIME OF CONC , • 31.75 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 9.45 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet,' L: 50.00 ns: 0.1500 p2yr: 2. 00 s:0. 0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 400.00 ks:27.00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 850.00 kc:42. 00 s:0.0050 TcReach - Channel L: 800. 00 kc: 17.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 7.70 cfs VOL: 3.53 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: 0225 NAME: OFFSITE AREA 2 25 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA i • 12.60 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE 1 • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION. .:. . : 3.40 inches AREA. . : 3 . 15 Acres TIME INTERVAL. .;. . :. 10. 00 min CN • 86.00 TIME OF CONC 1 • 31.75 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 9.45 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns:0. 1500 p2yr: 2. 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Shalliow L: 400.00 ks:27.00 s: 0.0050 TcReach - Channel L: 850.00 kc:42. 00 s:0.0050 TcReach - Channel L: 800.00 kc: 17. 00 s: 0.0050 PEAK RATE: 6.159 cfs VOL: 3.02 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min i 3/28/97 American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE OFFSITE BASIN 3 FLOWS CLG BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 03100 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 3 100 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 26.90 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 6.70 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 TIME OF CONC 54.73 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF 0.20 AREA. . : 20.20 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 350. 00 ks:27.00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L:2800. 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0. 0050 TcReach - Channel L: 1700. 00 kc:17. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 13 . 05 cfs VOL: 7.54 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: 0325 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 3 25 YR-24 HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 26.90 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 6.70 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 TIME OF CONC 54.73 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 20.20 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns:0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s:0. 0050 TcReach - Shallow L: 350.00 ks:27.00 s: 0.0050 TcReach - Channel L:2800.00 kc:42 .00 s: 0.0050 TcReach - Channel L:1700.00 kc:17.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 11. 16 cfs VOL: 6.45 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min (.:4111:C41741(UP, Okra 2..149 _ 3p I U-Nn &iOfI NO) • scAa u-ie/(4 1 I ' 5 "1LIM atoll."2„. 31-kti (© 9Q g 3/27/97 American Engineering Inc page 1 PIERRE GRADY WAY SITE OFFSITE BASIN 4 FLOWS CLG BASIN SUMMARY BASIN IID: 04100 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 4 100YR-24 HR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 0.22 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 85.00 TIME OF CONC 7.27 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF 0.20 AREA. . : 0.22 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70. 00 ns:0.1100 p2yr: 2 . 00 s:0.0200 PEAK RATE: 0.26 cfs VOL: 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: 0425 NAME: OFFSITE BASIN 4 25YR-24 HR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 0.22 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 85.00 1 TIME OF CONC 7.27 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF 0.20 AREA. . : 0.22 Acres CN • 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70. 00 ns:0.1100 p2yr: 2. 00 s:0. 0200 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0.06 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min li 4 I t _ KING. COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANU L I FIGURE 4.3.51)HEADWATER DEPTH FOR CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS W/INLET CONTROL — 180 _ 10,000 - 8,000 (I - 168 - EXAMPLE - 156 -.6,000 0.36 inters(3.0 tot) -6 (2) — 5,000 0.66 eta _ - 144 - 3 —4,000 — ww' Itw 6' ENTRANCE TYPE — . — 132 - 3,000 0 (re.n - - . 6. ` (I) I.8 5.4 - 4. - HEADWALL PLAN - (20 (2) 2.1 6.3 _ 5. -- • - 2,000 - J a. — - J - ICI in leer . _ . I I — - 96 J — 1,0 00 - - 3. ; 1 a 1 - M — 800 3. • o: - - - - 84 m - 600 - (1) - 500 - - 2. _ - 400 -'--~ MITERED TO 72 - . /�_ - 2• 2. CONFORM — 300 . . — - TO SLOPE i — 1.5 _ SECTION ill.0 en - z - 60 0 - 200 Q•..F,� - - 0 1.5 4- - w - AI -54 , o _ w - i-- 100 %/ 2 (` j 48 1X 80� CI - - 2 -I .:1 m 0 s.— 6,� 1 — PROJECTING " —42f N — 5o _ - 1.0 -.1.0 SECTION w A f- ` - 40 w 1.0 CC �6 - 30D -W SCA " ENTRANCE 0: w - (✓ TYPE w _ C - 33 - ( g8ii r I C — 30 - Q to sl• _ _ - .8 (3) ci - ' 0 - 27 - 10 (3) Projecting CC — 1 G c — 8 alp a - 24 .7 F- - 6 us ` 5 - _ 40 �lz APf72ox �3 21 _ To use scale(2) or(3) project F ✓L1_ 1✓LO�• - 4 horizontally to seal• (I),then — .6 - use straight inclined lino through —•6 04, Fl PE. - 3 0 and 0 scales, or reverse as 6 - 18 illustrated. - 2 -, - 15 - .5 — 5 - 1.0 .5 _ / - . F-4, 64711 C.,V1 f' =.7 so cp.5 CAPAG171-r (2/, Fuu...) 12 • • 4.3.5-12 1/90 Appendix C Operation and Maintenance BMPs I e applicant's proposal for maintaining drainage facilities is listed on the following pages. • 1 onsite drainage facilities will be privately owned and maintained by the site tenant,with the exception of derground conveyance facilities that replace the open channel. These will be owned and maintained by th- •ity of Renton. F.cility mainten ce requirements are as identified in the Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual •ppendix A, "Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities" and include: Access Roads/Easement Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per Trash and debris cleared from 1,000 square feet,i.e.,trash and debris site. would fill up one standard size garbage can. Blocked Roadway Debris which could damage vehicle tires Roadway free of debris which (glass or metal). could damage tires. Any obstructions which reduce clearance Roadway overhead clear to 7 fat above road surface to less than 7 feet. high. Any obstructions restricting the access to Obstruction removed to allow a a 10-to 12-foot width for a distance of least a 12-foot access. more than 12 feet or any point restricting ' access to less than a 10-foot width. Road Surface Settlement, When any surface defect exceeds 6 inches Road surface uniformly smooth Potholes,Mu•h in depth and 6 square feet in area. In with no evidence of settlement, Spots,Ruts general,any surface defect which hinders potholes,mush spots,or ruts. or prevents maintenance access. Vegetation in oad Weeds growing in the road surface that Road surface free of weeds talle Surface are more than 6 inches tall and less than 6 than 2 inches. inches apart within a 400-square foot area. Shoulders and Erosion D ge Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more Shoulder free of erosion and Ditches than 8 inches wide and 6 inches deep. matching the surrounding road. Weeds and Brush Weeds and brush exceed 18 inches in Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches height or hinder maintenance access. in height or cleared in such a way as to allow maintenance access. 1 Closed Detention Systems (Pipes/Tanks) Maintenance Defect i Conditions When Maintenance is Results Expected When Maintenance is Component Needed Performed Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a Vents free of debris and sediment. vent is blocked at any point with debris and sediment. Debris and Sediment Accumulated sediment depth All sediment and debris removed from exceeds 10%of the diameter of storage area. the storage area for''A length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15%of diameter. Example: 72-inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than Yz length of tank. Joints Between Any crack allowing material to All joints between tank/pipe sections are Tank/Pipe Section be transported into facility. sealed. Tank/pipe Bent Out of Any part of tank/pipe is bent out Tank/pipe repaired or replaced to Shape of shape more than 10%of its design. design shape. Manhole Cover not in Place Cover is missing or only partially Manhole is closed. in place. Any open manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Not Mechanism cannot be opened by Mechanism opens with proper tools. Working one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than''A inch of thread (may not apply to self-locking lids). Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot Cover can be removed and reinstalled Remove remove lid after applying 80 lbs by one maintenance person. of lift. Intent is to keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder!Rungs Unsafe King County Safety Office and/or Ladder meets design standards and maintenance person judges that allows maintenance persons safe access. ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs,misalignment,rust,or cracks. Catch Basins See"Catch Basins" Standard No. See"Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 5 • Control Structure/Flow Restrictor Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected When Maintenance is Component is Needed Performed General Trash and Debris Distance between debris build- All trash and debris removed. 1_ (Includes Sediment) up and bottom of orifice plate is less than 1-1/4 feet. Structural Damage Structure is not securely Structure securely attached to wall and attached to manhole wall and outlet pipe. ' outlet pipe structure should support at least 1,000 pounds - of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright Structure in correct position. position(allow up to 10%from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are Connections to outlet pipe are wate ght; not watertight and snow signs structure repaired or replaced and w rks of rust. as designed. Any holes—other than Structure has no holes other than deigned designed holes—in the holes. structure. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight Gate is watertight and works as desi_ ed. or is missing. Gate cannot be moved up and Gate moves up and down easily and s down by one maintenance watertight. person. - Chain leading to gate is Chain is in place and works as desi ed. missing or damaged. - Gate is rusted over 50%of its Gate is repaired or replaced to meet surface area. design standards. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working Plate is in place and works as design-d. properly due to missing,out of place,or bent orifice plate. Obstructions , Any trash,debris,sediment,or Plate is free of all obstructions and works vegetation blocking the plate. as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking Pipe is free of all obstructions and works (or having the potential of as designed. blocking)the overflow pipe. Manhole See"Closed Detention See"Closed Detention Systems" Sta dard Systems" Standard No. 3. No. 3. Catch Basin See"Catch Basins" Standard See"Catch Basins"Standard No. 5 No.5 • Catch Basins • Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected When Maintenance is Component is Needed Performed General Trash and Debris Trash or debris of more than %s No trash or debris located immediately in (Includes Sediment) cubic foot which is located front of catch basin opening. immediately in fromt of the catch basin opening or is - blocking capacity of basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris(in the basin) No trash or debris in the catch basin. that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of - the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or outlet pipe blocking more than debris. 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation No dead animals or vegetation present that could generate odors that within the catch basin. would cause complaints or dangerous gases(e.g. methane) Deposits of garbage exceeding No condition present which would attract 1 cubic foot in volume. or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Structural Damage to Corner of frame extends more Frame is even with curb. Frame and/or Top Slab than%inch past curb face into the street(if applicable) Top slab has holes larger than Top slab is free of holes and cracks. 2 square inches or cracks wider than Vs inch(intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top Frame is sitting flush on top slab. slab,i.e.separation of more than inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks lin Basin Cracks wider than inch and Basin replaced or repaired to design Walls/Bottom longer than 3 feet,any standards. evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks,or maintenance person -- judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than'A inch and No cracks more than'/inch wide at the longer than 1 foot at the joint joint of inlet/outlet pipe. of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/Misalignme Basin has settled more than 1 Basin replaced or repaired to design nt inch or has rotated more than 2 standards. inches out of alignment. -- Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as No flammable chemicals present. natural gas,oil,and gasoline. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and No vegetation blocking opening to basin. blocking more than 10%of the - basin opening. 1 Vegetation growing in No vegetation or root growth present. inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. it - II Pollution Non-flammable chemicals of No pollution present other than surface more than'A cubic foot per film. three feet of basin length. Catch Basin Cover Not In Place Cover is missing or only Catch basin cover is closed. Cover partially in place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened Mechanism opens with proper tools. Not Working by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than '/A inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person Cover can be removed by one Remove cannot remove lid after maintenance person. applying 80 lbs.of lift;intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to Ladder meets design standards and al ows missing rungs,misalignment, maintenance person safe access. rust,cracks,or sharp edges. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than Grate openings meet design standar. . (if applicable) 7/8 inch. Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is Grate free of trash and debris. blocking more than 20%of grate surface. Damaged or Missing Grate missing or broken Grate is in place and meets design member(s)of the grate. standards. � i I 4 I - Conveyance Systems (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Results Expected When Component Needed Maintenance is Performed Pipes Sediment and Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Pipe cleaned of all sediment Debris I of the diameter of the pipe. and debris. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement All vegetation removed so of water through pipes. water flows freely through pipes. Damaged Protective coating is damaged;rust is Pipe repaired or replaced. causing more than 50%deterioration to any part of pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross-section Pipe repaired or replaced. area of pipe by more than 20%. , I Open Ditches • Trash and Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per Trash and debris cleared 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. from ditches. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Ditch cleaned/flushed of all of the design depth. sediment and debris so that matches design. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement Water flows freely through of water through ditches. ditches. Side Slopes Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where Slopes should be stabilized cause of damage is still present or where by using appropriate erosion there is potential for continued erosion. control measure(s): e.g., rock reinforcement,planting of grass,compaction. i r � r r , I • . ., ' • 1 • 1 I • - .- .7------v-7- 7/77 / / E . • PROPOSED LEGEND 1 • L i Lif,,, / - . • - , • 1 L' 0 , , . I, • • • _.• „ • • • • TR.,„ ON MOUNT RA1NIFR oRin• i:)LVELOPMENT PLAMTN. ---Fi _-F-_, , f i L to NJ + • • SOUIXLAND COTTONWOOD WESTERN RED CEDAR RED ALDER cry OF RENTON / • . .,..•,,,Y:".......--- 1 • • • •I t UPLANEFTI AININEFFR• (ELEV. 11.0 m i 8.o) • 1 AU6 1 8 1998 UNDLIK•wORY TREES - ' • / I, -t‘ .:1:..-__1c...:... ../._1.://:..,:Ili ./r. i •N ...,1 /./,, VINE MAPLE BLDG. 2.5-01 • BLDG. 2.5-20 •f. HIGH SHRUBS LOW-SHRUBS ----- • I GRASSES/GROUNDOCATRS/FERNS RECEIVED . , . . . . . ; . 1 i -.. • ., - f, • ; 1 ,.. • • • • , el , / • 11, , , ,,.. , ,...--( . , • ,‘ FORESTED WETLAND; (ELEV. 10.0 TO 11.0) •' • •• - t. .. • UNDER-STORY-TREES "gl-C3-1 ...• ., , • • • HIGH SHRUBS • „...- , \ LOW SHRUBS •...--- ' I • GRASSES/GFIOUNDCOVERS/FERNS - • • • .. t ..._I :•••., . ( --•:''''-••-•"--tily.,' .Ak . . . gratIR4sHRtin__wRiANn• (ELEV. 9.0 TO 10.0) ----",,,,,..... 4 I.. ; ''''''''.-..• - - . • - 1 • • • • rg HIGH SliFtUBS• ) i '''. . •,- . .\•,'' ' -- '.t.‘''''•,‘• - V • •; w---,,, • . • . ....... LOW SHRUBS • .• • • • e••••••-•- , - , ' . •:'••••;•:' - WETLAND GRASSES. , . / , . 1 . . • or:. ....z:.i.t."- - ••••••,•••••-• EMERGENT wrrumn- (ELEv. s.o TO 9.0) x:::.:::•::::::::::::::::::, - - - - - -- - - - 1 • ' - •I • q•'•t." a Lt•...-; :',::ims:iri:i:Kof: WETLAND GRASSES/ • / • , .,,,-• . ,/, . i \ '‘',•••\\V ., w. • ' Ampo,,g- -.. . i . • ..e.14"P''' . .'" ••*.f.t..0.'s•r : • -u■ ., . . • •,..., ...,,. ,• • • • . FLOATING AOUAT1C WETLAND; (ELEV. 5.5 TO 8.0) , ,z. ., ., • • . •• / • to> :,e...zi.••..i......•%, t.yr....::::.:•?,;•:...i ",•,-;-;;;;;;;; ;.... FLOATING AQUATICS• • • / ,[.' , ' , , . ,-" • z ',' ‘1 N:-..\\-.. \'. ‘ \ ''' • ' ,,,,•'" ' %•"•••••••• -. 't..Vi • • • . . / • / • / •/ ''' ' • i I: i '. •I • .....,./............... NO PLANTINGS , ./.. ''' . / . . .it 1 /11;1' ',., ,, \ :I,•It\ vi..A.;., „I * !It/ersi.;..•i...1;:': '••.. '.• •• A • • ..7 x', '..••••--k- -.-;••:-.:.•••.........,.. ....,‘, .., . • . r ,. ,,. ,, . •, / ,,,. ----/ ' ///,-N'• \ \\\\‘ . -r/z/ .../At.,13, **-1;4.4*i':: -1.-v-.,e.''77••• • \ ' __. . r , :: J /. .! _ , „ --- l„, -.,---,-,...•,... \'\.„\-, i -......,,o---1...- --4::;?..:..........•:-... :k;ri.:',";,.:---.. ,-..,......„\-.\-....- DISTURBED BY NEIY CONSTRUCTION -- -7, i / /, .... ••••1 / s• ..... . . . ' „---/ _,•',,; -"•• s.\-.;•., '‘, s, \.. ••-•• /A*)..1?..4 _. ,,,.....„,..j. r,t,,.4:..:.:,,..l.f.t..:AA \ \ \ ., 1/ • ;•:,,V.'•:kr .....144:1'j 4.I.?•:;4::,... \ \ \' k 1 , / iii • „" ...•,,,,,," ,,..,,, \ \ ....., .. ".4.. •,, ,..,.•-•,. . . , , ,'..• •.• / ,-- ,i,' V.::', \ \ 4„V;..'''''''-,,,.‘2:1""'''-"-'.""'2'-••• .4 k•;, *V•V....T:A7......):N \ ... ....\\-;\, .\, \ .•Fti094'St,....,.• ,...17.K_E•05,;,? ,..,••• 't.T.,.!.::__ f•-,MI% seNt.-.1.-.•..X1-.1;. ; \\\\\\\ . , / ‘..\ . ••••.:4:::i..." : :'''1....,.'. ..kW."'''..--,17'..f.1‘.. 14:::•,*k ':•'4‘21_t-7::%::-.4,1s`:/'., \:,,,`, ..,••:,:z.::::..V.:•-:,..4..,••LI.'.0....,,v-z-i4z-4 ''''': HY' co.. 'V irt^•••tel 1 4 .4 • 1 ! •''••••••'/ ////• i 1 / , .' ,.'.::1,ii:::"A3iiietn.ii*S242:';10iiiiii::44::•,,".,.. :.-01.::::::•••Zi...r...,LI.. k..'..,: 'iiiiNECT miffs = • s " ",:.-s'`.4:•M:-..:reF:Fx:i.”....&"`U:.•,.w .'''''''''':.ii,e••••••- -' ••-•‘'• ,--:?":7 'miT OF AREA i / '...':' ' ..'0.a.f. .:•:%,..."4.4 ,;.,;:i.:-.-:;:4•0*•:,.... ' ..* sts,,,n•.:•C:s.1••• \\\' ;RBED By •''Z's '?;Ig:-..*:.iftiiiVkin?.*4044:1:.::'••••••••••••:...•::•••::*. ,•)•;•iziT. .:••••,;-.--.\\All4TRucmoN) • • 1 ._ ./I • I : . . 1 . • t i ; 0 i I • I ' • ! : . I i I lifi 1 . 1 I fill .1 11', •4! .',4.:*!..?•0,:.!:...:..ZW:v5r4roZR:k••, if,,.. '33..3.3.33•3332•3:::.*:!•/...Q3......•:fp313.::::::::. AI. .... •S... ....• ,,,'...,...•••,L i .. ' \ '''' *aMigfgas.:4. .2.jil- ..".....!!:•%Z/..4•4 .. ;10.,...r;?%.:::s\'.\"%\. \ \jN., . ''',‘;444'?.:gi:Eli::t4k.....1:::Iii?..rii;•."...q.,diz":::.....S',...-"•24:4,, .: ..,,....-. •,\ •• .. • -,..\-11, ,;•., ",•.••••:::-.:::::::m=0:::•a::•::;,. -t, •••=:::::::!:. („,, -., •:. P•t• .1%." ' •,' `, ..,.... .... • •.• < ••,..., ......- .t . , ks• ,. , i • 1 It I', \';•11.1 I A•,,-:.. -vo. is ..,..„., ..„„... ...m,„„,m...:::,..,:..,... j••............4, , ... ..... ,....... .. .,-,..,.. STORM WATER ,_. , ! 1 • : • , \ ,.:',11'11 ,,: . 14043„, Vs...;., V„,,,::33,V3.,....3::•.<3. .::%,....D• ...si.,•:,,,,, .1, „ •W...•A...,,...„.., ..E i •• ..1....,, .' • : t I i 't .1.•! Itk,::::,•••:. It '1.‘...'..,•,......''....;•.,4i,:44aiti.ch*::i:..:..... ...:::....::::,i:,• . -..,, Ll'i..".1,„.• ..,..,1..•zz' ''a ey....,..... TREATMENT POND . • /--- i ' .,,-..11-k., 1 v. ::.• . ••••••,,,:;:.:,,,,,,w*.ww:iift.4: :..-,am!hiiiiii:. 44 '•-• -k.-'"4-.--,...,2...-......1•••• CSTC LANDSCAPE I , - ci.,-.-: ., .s, ,,,,,, ,„-.,0?•:,;:::::::.::: :::::::,;i5A,... --....,is.,imil.:.. 4, 4., *4 • . 4'7•: .••....1,.....,j .7;.... ,e,' - % _. ."...1.1 •:14:771'.7.s:•• •': ••• •.1,It:;.•"41,..i. 4 PROJECT LIARkIn-SMNil,'•:: "':1-::'..- '•.';,;••,s'•;; MkAAS:::.0:: ' "" .4.• • ••,',. ..,11%‘7 -.....„ -..4•4•,-,.: '3::.. -re.: -2;r';':","4"r:t: :1-:•„, •.:• • • -. 1.1.+,"„,..... c..4`.;•••4•%...1•:- -..z r A I •II, e , --- -4--....--r-, ... -• ... .....•A?-i. r•-. • •...z.t...:. ..1.• ......v.I.. ..• ,.,,,,..••••r.o• . :: .,„,.• ••; I / . • , , „, • / IiIili bisiiiResi-sr ij' • 1-: y-,••••••••••••••••••••••••• '1--,', ...- t 0 //,,„,,,,\\••.i:•. .:...t.,..,...--;;....--...,,,„.....z( <-.:•i, • ,„.......•.;,:. •••••...„...;..-:.•-•• ,• •..,.,....,:,,-----rs:-..-4kay.f.,;.-.... • ;,:ll i • 1::• • •-(•-•-•--:•:•:•••••••••• '•-',A',',,N, .Kfz.v:... • • $,/ i .., 0,-,-... 40.•,--4.,•_•&. . .......40..t:•4:•••••,:*.t.:..1.:i... •••• • . I sorttm,_./....-..--7:4--;••:-",..4_yt,05,..,T..A.: . Ar..4",,,o. s, .., :. / . . / , i • CONSTRUCTION) :1 1;1.':, -.':•..."':',':.-: :-:.:.:-:-. •-"`-`•‘. ',:`,`, --:-::-*,::::::::::::..vt-0-.R.•-:'':::1:.:*::,. 0:-.-JI: Oft • ,-..-F.s.••t:.•.•. , • • *.l.• • .' •'-'. •• .''''r •:}1.54,:4,";* •'4.••4. e•-••• ,fr. • .°V ..‘*•'A I illi;1 / ,' i,;!/1 /`1...i• •;. .":':::.•:•••••••••••X....../...•:'• ''''''• ...1.`s;`,"s'Z'ss;:;;‘_,.`At.:.:'%::•"'•:1:.::::t':...y.•::•00';.:::>.,•::,':Wigii;4",• •Iii Ailify ..• /.."'...41Z"..1444`4%.:..- 4.V.*::•.•••••'%. ••••••-;•!-,-.1,,te01:41.4,... • '"'''....*-1.,A4.-4.,.......••....".. . . li,s,'.1.:'..'. :",:'•':".•::-.-,:•:-Y,:-:-:.:.:•::..•i• '..'. ":,, •,,,:`,:,,'''':::4-SV:-',i:E'Zve9'.ii:::.::.:•*.g2/4, ., !".#44.1.:4_,...4••-••,.-.Ivo • ** ..••••'.. • -..r.r'714-.......•••••,;': • ...4%.*•-• •• if „IR, .71.1•: 1 . , ', Y • / ," •'1'1 ' •.; I•'••••••••' ••"AY."'".'.•••• ''''.•.,\': ':':'•, s':'::•t:',, • W'''NEEM714,'"riP j// it.•••fi.?..,f4.74!:\,rf. .#,/.''. • ' , -Z..•...... ill:, .1.1%... • \ i • ) • ./ •,•'' / / XI ''',11''.1--. i'1';',.-..-:-..:...-:•:::..:.k-:•:.:.:*:•.*.•.'.'• •'.'.., '',',',',',. ' ',',',',.--..,:'„...*::::.,...,.:::.alii tri i 4. •-•••• • 2 / 'W,';27 il f': I-••• 1."•••••••••••••••••••"••••••••••'••••••• • •.• "s4',;,,-,;'•'-;,;•;'•, - .„4..9•V:,.:•,,,•Eil0 i ,/ .,„.1i7.7.•••?•• •,-;_,rt.-• 4 4 4,r ..."'...;4•• ',/ r.', . • l'• .A.• .jtit .1."...i. •••••••.:3'.........:•.........y.N......:•:•:•......:.;.y.•.:.,... . '''..3...,'..•.....•%A.‘t. 'WY.Z,. -.......1"-:Ira ii,I ,t, „p:.....MitiWy..'.:.7:T.,..iP4:••:•,., -....,, .4", ..-/ -5c.I..flia: ifill, ,.0,1.'• i .7• / „,-• %'''," ...,...,.....,,,,,,,,, •..,,,,z,...4 :.5),,,y,41 ,4 .:,- •4...:•:..,•••:-.:•-•........••:•k,,,,,t...-4•14':-.,... ..0, •- .r,.. „110.'"•-,.:4::,.4.:‘,.mz..1,41!.,411,11 ?. 1- , , . , ..,••• ,,- itif;,/ii...1.-.•.' :::-.:1,0•./.1•10fritiptiri..:•.:•..-...,..... .•••••,..,•••,.•,f,..,„,.X.,-,5,-.:1:-4-Iiii ito: .vicfa.`-•;,----,.--......,\:::4-:?..,::,gf-14.:141 Ar, . •••••• 4t:'&4:!:-§!•0:••••c''''''''S•Viifig :k. / ,•- .••'' '//'/ ....1 '' EXISTING pi..4. .':1 , -:-..... ••••• •''`-:`:•IY..!•.0.. ••••:-:•:-:-:-:-:•:-:-....:.•..... -•.r.., •.••;sk, .,,;•.R 4: .1 1 iiki::?•" 1/4', '.::;?.;:.:::Vo.•;:-\irlairiZ.............._ . • ,,,,,,,.ivi'..00figli.0140 :;;L.: j / 4 I ' "•• ,•/ . y „.,.••' ,-:1;••:', MAIN KIND ...----•••••• ,.,,.- ....:.•:. :, i .44,///::::...:Y Atiug:Itx",t.0::•:.::.....:.::.::'•:::::::.::.::::.::::::•:, ... 7.,; %Z* `, ., X:PII:0 ./.1 tiyif. -.... ''.<1..ti,,,,,kkli::•:',1...1,.:,,t, '‘..°'•' .- ,X•Piii•W•':0 iie.,:;3:•••:ifigi 10,.',4 . •1 i ( ' , . f , , . ,• //.....,,f.qi•'•••,' • • - •-• \-. • - ---""•••••:,..••• -"....n.••:.• -f, 4........4 ;a: Fl II .9.it'-.;:: .••••••..-............ . -% ....„,...„.;....„,,,,$..,,,..1:.z,....t.,. •:,:x....-.02,:::::::-. .t:: _ _,„,...,21.‹';•:4•:. .• .:•••:, Av/// ,:•••‘•.- . s, /.. i i • . j .,/ ,.,:::•;,i;:•-•:•;::-.:•••-•- ..(47:'/...•'''r'rial, ......"•••••••.:•:,::::.;•:•;;:i•:;::-........:::::•,.:::::•:.....:;••:::::•:•;••........:""•.••••;'•••••••• ............. •:' ..', "V C:::.::::PI' :# Fil 14.e.: 41 "........•.••••••••:•;•:".•..'.. • -.4 A.,:.:X::.13r.:41,#•• Ay -- oriorse.r,„,.. , •P• ../e-s.i.;i:;.,9,,,/,/,/ : -•:;%. .,,,,.4.0,,'''''',414532;;... .. .•.. ..••••••..••••••••••••••••••:.:..-•••••••• .-1/4‘'s ••• -,::::Oil, e 11::''.. 4 •.,,,...7....v.,'.'.'.'."-: ..4.• ••%.?•"...:5:: ::.,?*4-.4444o•-f / I 1 ' • • I .• , '.•-•/(2:., •-• _.„./..erooat,...,,:.:............,.. '.. ..o.• "A"::::',.•::17// • •••J= •1 I '/ / X i i 1 ,/i/c./ •.... ••,_ /:'...:P.,Eig..igi*%;:.:'..r&.,?••••,..-..i,.:-ect,t,:a•A•A'ff•:178.40.0. 4's- . 04....M'AP• / •Yfi.:41 '•"••'''' • ••••\ ••s,n i!0 1.1 /il..11'i.5:' .•::::':".'"•••••••:.:':•:*:•::::•,-,..:Y.,r'- '%,*,‘,•••,•••••:...,.:,,•,--•„•-••-•, : - --:......:9-,:x..........on,„........,..J. . 000.....,e.n.: ..,./ . • a, '•! i• I 1 I ..;' ' 1 .. /;•::" /7 ,,,,,,-;4,....es2,0"6' .',1 ..''-'.:4,..';;;•=:'ssiz'z'zo's;',.4.. ;..1'.•-,--:.• ..-"%....":•':•:":-:-:.:.:-:....d.../:;::`;...? : ii.:.;:i,ilire :ii9!:.ii.. 'ii •:::::::.::::.:::.::::::::••••:-....::...s.s.:::.:.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::.... •:..... .......,,,,,,..,,z....„,,........,,,m*,,,-.:?.ime,....... ........,,,,o....J.;,--------. ...•. • ...,.,::, 40.. ..,.;,.,.. .1.• A I , 4 % •. • •• -..apn.-4-- ....L.... 3: A• / 3 7 • ,,,-.:,....- ,,,,00.03. .-,, .,.....:„.,- .f. '..,','-'s;•;•,,,,,,,,'s's'sc;,,•-•,%;•••,•,, --...---.-0-;"'s-Z-Z-..',-;-:::Vtill 4 .0 k•:::. t -:•••••••••:-:••••:•:-:-:-:-:•.-..y.....:....-.....y.............................................._. --..,..,...,..,,,,........2,.,,,„„.,., .,,.:... . ...„,...,- .. ...... ,::iio...dt. , ._,„ t.._. -I 11 .1• I i 7 . ".I. 1 ifill? II _;..••••:,-.2 - ,,,.• .4--•..,::::V...::::*.iia.:1.k.!::.::,,;,::•..,;•:•;:;;,..::, '-'s•••••',%,,,...s s's'•'Z's'••‘.. ''",•':':s,'.7. „'••;'Xs';:ie,Iliji!," ilgi.:(-:11 .•••••••Y=.•:-:-:-:-:-:•:-:•.•:::-........r....x.-..:.:-:::-..:.-..:.-..:.....:•:.:-:-......................:..-... . --------••••••-• • ....••••••• ,,,,„. :,,,,,,,-.;,.:.., , / .v.v. 1. it• I I 4 i '• ' •11:, \1, •••••:-":. :- - ••'•••••414:',1.3:4i•€:-.4RIPRA4WW••••K'q•::.!s'4'44•4'.'.'.'4'4'4;45'''' '.'s'Vs .'s '‘'Z 4. :::.:.. i•.'ji liP '4Ir?'••••:•:.• A .•••••••••:".................:%.:;.':'........................:......:•••••••..;I:.:.:..•...."•••••:Iff:....:....•-...,,:. . . .....::..•.•••••:::••:•'. -..,2°;:kV..,I!:._. •••Ar‘.:?•• = .1 ‘ 1, ,1' i 1 r „,„ • ',, -...\,... 1,.\\\ -1:?;•.--- ;:.--.--;-:--1;•:-;:::-*4'0:41.4:5:4411":4iiF..1: 4"tr.,•:kadit'Airi'•ii'';'':-.s:- .e ''''''''' s; Z....-;.sf. "%'.4i.:114111,10, Osit•.,;„t,‘.k,1/4....:::::. .....":"...........-:.::"............:.:.:.:.:..:1:...:.:.:........ .1:1.:.:.:":1:::':.?....:.?....ff:..-.:.....:.::.::',.:.:',...:•':':•......:1:::"..'....'..s.:'::..:%:%:%:':.%:'''' . ,,,,..e••••••••*70, ;016.- ./ .;%i14.!&;:••7 \ I ‘; \ ;.' '1, 1 ik.• \\*......, '''.:, . -:,-:::-s:',--',,-::::::::"'.7.7___::::ri'r::rm,r_4s.„,;;;: "t:..j,r:--!::•I-I.!:;!..:e:Pio,o; .11.,--........,.".7.4.,..;..1.fli.,...7,.,..7.,.::,-,,_-:"::7•:_.,_:.,-: :•.:• •.:"..1....,:::_--„,...t..::::',......,...,,,-.1,,,,.....,_„..-:-:::- ....-:-.------sil,L.:-;:ii:::„...:17,1121.,:-.,::::„..7.:§-1,-,•:,•-:7::-.:7°---:,::,-..:4:-.!::.!...:734..0-:-...-17 ------;•••••-•-.1";--... 4.9. • '• ••\. \. :\. •\,....,:.----":„ •\*.\-\\• . :::.,...___ ____,.:•••,.,. --,......,-----..2.,,,--.4. -w-. .r,..-0x5tc4,-, ..4: ________ _.--;-_-2.-_-_,zsi,:-.-•-•:.-......„---__.-: ,.•''71' .....A rA rA Mr ,..._.......10.•-. .,;ii"... , ..... -- --- --17.- ----- -• .- .----..• -.... _., ‘. •.....3..,•.i••••:::----.7.==•-----_"--:-..".-.r.---- •••••-- .---,;;;;•,...--- ..0111. II.___;1.1. ,, 41,• • = .... „.1)01•••••• ,• 1... -...„ ... -..------------ _ ...••••••...- A.. ..... .1--..-. . 44'..•.,eir44"#..I'.///////..3 0 e-.....A..„,r 0 w• .ACT ' .....7-73.-4.-...-.......-....________.....................,,,,,„„................,......,03 ..--- S.....•.. .„ . j '••. \ \ .\ ''••;, 1 -..--'..-:---;•••--,••••••.-7.-- ,•I'-'...r.."A*:9%.;•A..."•'-e••':el f°'A/•/'-'%,/•A r#7.3.7e .,,,,_, ,x4,a,A.rzA4A A.A,Aff.fa d&a......,,,•fkligra.EC,'"•; -7..•..A.r•••_ - ,.._.,„.•r„ ., :A.,.0•4'.• .............•1••; .,,...A-,---_,,..__,...._.,.. _.. :_..r.____.. .,....,..:i.,..s.,..,,,,,,.".,,,,.,.. ..,....:> ,. -/;.:•••W‘?". .. --_-:-.A.-A= --= -----=•-•,,,- .1,-=M ..,--•=--..--A_._'----.44•_4;*..€4-'.4=__eir•,e,.., • - -• .:•r--..r.r.-•-_,3-,•-••••-'•••- • .'LIE?". ....,.•• „iv AD 111,,.,,,4.21.7.,T,0 r...."#--„,-.... .A.-.-_,,,A.A...._'.a'5,77-:;..._..A-• =,;-=-----'----..--''T-'s--''-'-'-'''.--:-.,---'---'' ..... ....;__--,"•-..,_72...--•--r -'.!51-•_.:_.,•--:•,,-•-.-,--7=.7.- -'-- --.'• ••••--.....••4.......7 1. - ..-'.... - 4. ..• .••••- \--PROJECT UNITS E ' •\‘.. \ \ ' \ P h -•••••••••:':::-••=,•-:.•••-•• )•-•": .•••'-•••••:-.•;•;,0040.0/4:,,,,,_ __a__401.7.'•••••••••••er••• ••-••,- -.1----.,-:-:----1:- t''' --....._____-_-:_-_,... ,.... ••••••-re•-• Aasingrn•d•ka.ng-Ps.s ..-...-;- ,-. •--.,-__-•.--.-.. .- - --- •-i, -,.. • .,...,,,,,T.,.,...t....... ....1;••• ,..„...-Av......., ...-••-•-•'• -+-4/.-- .••••':"I NWT OF AREA \ •\ \ ' . '`--'''''''''-'- '-- -:-" ••••••••••0••/•/-6'0-- . -.%- ' DISTURBED BY . • s, .. -• \ . '•• f;, ..-...:,,,•-•-• ..,--''''•fir.-#.0,-/:‘,,r-': -----.---•-•••r---•'--%- -;', • -. "` •\ 11 1;1 ----'1. '...:,..-:',,-,:-‘•:::•,...jk•••••-•;%,'• ....:;,....x,,,,,.•..„-:.-,,---- ---. ... CONSTRUCTION)t . ' . . .. ",, • .. ... -:„„11, k-0':,;•.' '--:-1-•? •.1 -• 1---1.;.1f.:•-*----- ---------- .. .......„--- •-•-•________ - _ _______________---___ 'a' " • ' . \ /• 'k \ . e r: ..--3.) ..::,::....t.::7 ',,. '7....t.;.*:A.e. -- - .,... ,..___ ''‘--------•.-------------- -___ .--,,.., • - -.---_____.--- - ----- PROJECT LIMITS / . q --:-"--211-_-.-:-•- . -......._ : . I* ---; •..,_ -•••••••;" -• - • • '.......--.....--=:::_i_ illATRSEDF • i,j .z---::___-•--._-_,- ----=-L---,c----=',.-•-4--._...,----- - -_______ -- ------ . • ..... ---- -- ------- i; 'I .:••.. CONSTRUCTION) ,„.- .• , . , E. i • 1 / 1 i • i : i i • o 60' 120' 180' BRUCE ft, •.. 1 i , 1 ./..n....r ___ Ati1 DEES&-glqw I s , _ __ _ ______ __ _ 7°. ---14°!---- •'24 •--.1m.-'''''T"L-:-A.S&AgeT4.15•7.' -- -- = ---- ---- - --- -4 'yr =....c•••••=1.=.1= ;-. ' -1--- 2 1 -----. GRAPHIC SCALFS ••••-•••••-•-•..... :-. MOM JAM. =MIL CURRENT REVISA3•1• SOME DAIL ; sni /CASON --.. fff /ARCM DAff SW REVS= BY .311.343) OM • ACCEPTABILITY sjEIGEN 1R5 DESIGN moice e.g... 072298 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN • f_ SPECI1CADON 6 AFff6MED PJ"kla 07.22.98_ ME MEET iii_Airtil'AE/Airag e APPROVED DY DEPT. DATE , U . CHECKED. . ARMES 07.22.98 SURFACE WATER - ..,-. ii • ... MANAGEMENT PROJECT 979121-00 3 . . AAPROVED :: • " CIVIL MASTER LONGACRES OFFICE PARK C"C'.3. 25.YD- ?; •.. . ... .. . _ .. .. ...... .. • •- .• - .. .. . . . . .. . . " • . . . ' . . 1 ! , , . 1 . -2.-----;:::" --1- ',\ -7 --- _ \ )2. .--- ---- t--II I. ---'::-:'-:::::::: -1 -..-- --- - ()--1 * .....‘,,.:::.J:::--1 _____ 4 0 5 [ ____.j Lz-1-5-----7- [ __ :.,,2: .1J----- \ ''' '/,\ , . . ,.... . _._. ,______-J-_____,_,___ _ ________ ______t____ ! .! „.. „ IK.)! -- , 1 _ _-_-_----,_--L-T-_-_-_-- _ -_,-_-_---- ---- ----- ',„ '',,, „..,!'",:! !!!':-::::-::-.:!,--- ! ,11_-.11___-_.,!,!,,,\i.. `" - ---•--_----j - - _L_ _ ''' 1! •:!' I!/ ----..:•:[-!---:---,?:,:::?:-.- \ ) -1 \ __ li,i __ i _----, , . _ ,. i \, + 10 Il l „,,,,,,,,,..q. , ,..::,,,,z.,IPROJ al (V . 0 !! \\\ 0 1 IT„..1117 1 ' "' '8 ' -,czi'" \ , ni .4-4C.,1-,----•„. ,,I\ -,---r=-----------:----=---1 hi ' 1 ,S.,,g-h -- -,-- ---- !„\\!, I 1 I !ii I 1 oole 11°M? 1 .1 Y CITY OF - 1H( , B B ! CITY OF! il 1 L/q? RENTON ! !! „\ TUKWILA/ 0 II II \ 1 11 ! ! \ , S.W. 23RD ST. I ilk_-•___---. - \ I 0 .1 1 \\ = = = +-!- 1 AP /T ST R -- - T S . W . II EDE) . , HI BOEING 1 - ' * I , En , PROPERTY I 2N U-) li LINE I IIII .- . r- --I -- -- _ 0 - C) 1 \ Cr) !\ > ,(r)13 J Z 0 F--- CIJ 2 -, Z m I— C 0 ,_. , -_ z rn jazI I co -‹ 2 1 lr) --) mc 9 I gx u) -32=- 0 i 1- z, , i---- _ ! z, I I 1 . ,,,i S.W. 34TH STREET _ I I rTi 1 - z z I 1 Z 1 -1:1 V.il 'i < m2 m ' I -,'" z IP- I II 5 5;111r. I I I , L'• 1 ,-/ > 1 0 h!._, i il •.,--__ ___-.. i , i I 1 .j — -1 (2 I I 1 INCH = 300' ! li (APPROXIMATELY) LI I II r ,1 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ! T WSDOT 5 BN RAIL ROAD StiegA[Pdp NEIGHBORHOOD I V I L I N C 2 0 CITY OF RENTON ©GLACIER PARK PROP. C , _ i 3 HUNTER DOUGLAS 0 McLEOD 600 108th Avenue N.E. DETAIL MAP ®CITY OF SEATTLE ©ALLPAC CONTAINER, INC. Bellevue, WA 98004 . 1 (425) 452-8000 SURFACE V,VATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT , I . 1 , • V,,r jai \\j �00.(. rr-i/l, . 4-11 �,�, _ I BOEING CSTC PROPERTY MINE (/)I` t"r-^ -'r,\I` BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE 9,R°' F\ 4j,"9-,-`•)\}�II I PARK (LOP 4 1 ;1'"4 0 15o 300 600 'I g ,la----'' PROPERTY LINE." _ _,,.I,r;I',J�q� I GRAPHIC SCALE pI ° / 1"11��4'fry Y?: �`I III+)/-I g'\O, I'I i "'�� "` \ ,yam ,a.. _ Q�\OOR,rn°� {!4- r�1'�t� I11I'1"'�fiiiljl�'I (1 r�^'\0\,�0., `P_ Y ',;.�1./,,rl �'--, ,'1\ ___ ate,. ,a.•:; r._l,;j' I16 e ..: r /. III i,l .\^t '�( • 11,1 ;,,, % =t \ PROPERTY OF `� �� ,J`"� � ''[-�-� ,�. r, 4 `r=� % `� \.. ;` __t' _ -,'..:' i �l CITY OF SEATTLE c^`I .-N �`_ ^ �. .1. !! BOUNDA• •/'�/,� C4DAR'M1MVER'PIPE41NE i 3 POEING • J%' • In PROPERTY /; i � _.. `k' - _ 'FUTURE OAKESDALE AVENUE SW LINE - IIIIIIIII IIII•,a ¢°'IIIIIIII,'I;; , , / ,. ,'•: _ —- _ __ - 7 '.,I a muuul II A`,' ,\,.�c .'I -- ' 1-. - ( _I !I,— --y [I—, i'-1. - w. _> _ _— . :—/ -� 1 � ,� TRR,r _ = p \\\Q` `:f7t,:rii If 1'I 1 00000 00 1" in'i 1L,,S ,] j-, /II r:';--_,5 ` 7- j )/I' I� i 1•-', c\ _ ,- 6'"�'III,IIIIIIII� „.IIII 1411''"",,'"_tiq 1�\,`\, -��� �I. ,,7 r _ I. !'-�L `:�Ste- t I t '7•I` -� I II( � -. -BOEING I = III I I11',1'; hIII;I I II V a:' - - Jsi / / - cSTC I E `I :t J,H,1II!11,0)i;�Flt,�.j'I! 1 I. ! �71.__I'E'�11, „i 'T �-J•��'--,,"` .� f�i t I!' II ( �j/l l -/ . LY 6I�I i�'ry •\ 1 �` --_ --_ I _ '-' --- __ ��` Al7I' _ �`:' SOUTH"mot LNEPERttI' 11= I ., 4-;,f;!!;/jll/ I" 1 BLDG .v,' I i(I-�G1 r l ) I u'-�1;1/ - l� I 1�II fi —-' !� .., 1'(i(('3s :ail I I) 2520 '•'... oo .. ��nn�a Ili' , , '�` \_,J / `� I: i� -=i-, / - !I I;a.�'I '`,,,,,SH' r zs-ot �� 1 r''L %'•;:lLl oo d a '7 �L''ti, i` \,,fir -,I I, I f \\ I 25-02 1= CSTC Sri I'' /,: I/ II I A '°�I r aC4-c.- �/�(�.L`.I'`�y v o )I I III ;/ "� - '� 4 '--� 7 I 'V .,—� (} f -\A; �" _ BUILDING I lI�{�,;'I; (' •• ., 1 t _ �-- -_ i n -= T -ter _ _1:--t ..� t I W�^ 1-- \_,� .�'/1 I,•i - - _ 1, � r--- , '�` �:\ -,,7,. _ :. +. -,,y�" 1'I �. '. , --(` •� ) 1\II,II I l i 1\ ` i \ /�/" / = f,&'` -w.�''t•\ ' -- '., I. I \C, •�.`i ,,I /',- EI`:=I - •I'I' ,rIf.'•. I \'—. .I w f ' �\ - " " j • '- ?vr`:F , I I .�, i""I^ I} Il1 „ 'IF •\ — � I ' � . —_ 1 ,, ll,emuam M.' V ' 1 ;: \\ •li \OL v,s(,a-rt-`-BOUNDAA i ,.._',\�'� _•�: /1I It II' j� If i p I I � ` - i : : ,.d 1 ; /:,f �;, `- ?\ , q\ •,1 / ' ,•\\, 1 I 1 ' I' 1L. i I r I-, I j ( " i NCF Ii i „ —1i ! / I I'' Ii L�'Jl/ ' ! I I ` \Iri i ; .\ _ k " ''' � � 2 _ 1III' it �t t`y II il. Il I� ' 1 i � - /( I I_ {4.6I1I I IIVII II -/ h ( `1 _( Ili1"_,�. lIIOI.IIIIIIIIr _ , I , � i . : 1 , 'id 1� I .I IpFF14 ¢ARI II \, I(%II I l ` 4 \\ I II T 6i,lullnl n, J i, : ' I .. C �. —_~' "' -'tf7- \ I1II / 1 _ ISITf _ _;�;f l / ' a' /'' z/�1I F1 I. �! ! ( I II ' \ )1: � f I l l` _?I /4�\ \SI'n�,:IIII II III;I1= II'', « . s/ • a —'• •1 . ? %•,i^ /riiilIll:+/• c III'.1 ! I. 1li4i-IIIII:II 1,0.IIVlI'I I , _� •4 -IIIr. .'. yI i t- I ,. ,,�\. \ t I I � .- • •:. ' ' ;i� R _/, "' I _� ' I � I 1 I jl Ir, 11 I I If l� _ - � 1 \ , I \ _ ter , , -\.N 1,,,.. -.,rI' �.J . ? � ° J„) = . yf - IY_0-, -1 -1 . [-I �I-1- \f-1,_\1,I}-r I--I I ,-' i ); _ _ -4- _ Y. J IIj � ,I Il 1 I , 7 I 1 ? , \ I -_ I. II f ' 1 _ ji . o_I 1 , 'Il II I, I, I - 1' I'I 1 -,• \ _ 1'V � • _ —J IJ 1 I tI, I CIi,. 0 t • •• • •� • �• � i T171 I IrI I f —I •'JJ iTRAILER 'CASbQNN—A�D�STORAGE-AREA. .II I I rJ1I , . tI I � , ' 'lam_ . • II 1 . I I i - 1. l I• 1 - - I — ' •�{ ��ysG�iiI��:`I:�"'}'I:I�`:'I�: �::�I�'�'''5:'�_� t �IIL o. \ _r •fv • •� P • ? . . _ _-- rJ . r1 ! JI 1 -I (. i • � . .._ " ••••• p — am/ --=�-, • 1 ----.• l • • '\ �, - ---- �BOEING PROPERTY LINE' •:; j '.' - 1"-.: -;. � = � ' IIIli BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY __ '11 eVoirdr®' I:�i�e ar 8000 m 1.190N BY WK. liam m WA 000Ew''eEMU.10 OR � "suss PROPOSED GRADING PLAN PENS.941 IA — _ AEUSL,AW c ARM... SEPA PRE-APPLIGTION NI $ L SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 0 14002 .�,,,, �69 3 PROJECT ' ''D (CMI/-WSIER LONGACRESUFRCE-PARK"`' DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 RECEIVED GI 100021.0.4.0MM- rld 1 • e THE BOEING COMPANY .- .L.,, . .„ SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT SITE DEVELOPMENT - RENTON , WASHINGTON zw o PERMIT REVIEW SUBMITTAL i I ?L6 JULY, 1998 .7.-i a'r1x •5 E7) 00 6 0 I • 1 ••- .. --., • PROJECT SITE v BOEING PROPERTY LINE 1 S.'S- ••-•- - 8E ,, -o bE F. >"Z id - - F.C.1 e.,. 1 ord '2-.. ,S I . 1.;•:V:r''-:: ..177.7.-z---A :„:::.,7,-4-0S 4.,L:“‘Y. :,-1 . '117'• Iti . . ...... -..,.L.,,..4? ...... ........., L., .......... ............ ............ ni \ II 11,4 ••••••••••••••- ......::::..- - . ...... , ..... . ,= i ,' , giK i7.1 'i '‘‘, ciTy ••••••••• • j_____ 1____J, :•.,..,•,:s:••:••:••:•: 11 - :!•• .. .: ,. ]:,.•.; qii : .. , OF PROJEC_ITI eilf..::::::' SITE h An:, ThCIVLAF:i P.P'PENRCTY .--7. ItINE- ' •t I 4 ' : RENTON • A .6 11 , ; .• ' •• ..- . .. 1 1' : I I .4 , : , i\--130EING ' • PROPERTY S.w.,27"r“.51RECT ... --i 1 1 LINE-1----- ••-•-••-- • PROPERTY I !I Si A 1 L LINE -a \--BOEING I ••- MAPLE i i t gl ----; 1 5 PROPERTY •I se.y... : - . -------- 5' I CI i • . UNE-..Ni ..... 1 ...• .","-" . ..... .. 1 t:gii 1 t 5 .N 1 ___ ___ _ __ ____ _ __ __ 11 i•• .. . :.. ../ 1 i 1 1=OW ...N.. / l'.11 ..• ...) II .-: . ,.. •'• L § .., , ... ,.. ). VICINITY MAP 0 SITE LOCATION Nike Ss •NONEI '`‘te• - g ' SCALE:NONE SCALE:NONE -... E 6 . _ r PERMIT SET-- 1 • L —07.27.9B &1/2,1t.24.1.2314.1LICAll_ I 11/Z SIC 25.1.73I.RC.lUit — 1 g . ,- , ^"a.014012\2220\DWG\G2100025.DWG 7.• '0'0 0— m'"` Not. SAS SNOAH a CITY OF BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �08.28.88 RENTON SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ��'-���I INDEX OF DRAVONGS •• wnn PlonnirgmBu�ldna^PupOc Worb Dept. G2 NO. REVISION R1' DATE APPR ...... Cregq II mean P.E,Mm�ialrotor n I In I I I I I I •I I I•I•I I•I•I•• H • I I I I IIHHH 1192 ZM, �L��ARII �I���Q��R�� 5.''Q9 m> IRRRRRRRR RIbIRIRIRIRRRIRIRIRIb bbole T 1 Io 4 m S I l I 1 z !t)bla{OIOb10blTOI4010b VA Olb{0'h 'Qmae: Isssk �kA£AaaA��� £A� 60 ssssslslssssssslssss tON k66666,161616'666661661,16 PA" 1 m g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III III III 1 I 11 11 +I+.IT'LL.I I+•I•I•I •III• I I zE r5PPPP tiPPft o&0000e00000e§o_o, §g 4 m* I^'mt..v.�v ggAt8e6;�Ynka#ZS "'� P.;mr"f'r %'r, 1GGGGGGGGN RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRiG Z'^ �Esas8E8§ ”asaasaassaa881H Ti ggggggggg EEMI000a 00008 WM zz"—Lzi LL�zzgf.gg"g 2Z 2Z2Z2Z2 z PPRFIRPFARRg ggiliTM RRAARPRPA szaszr�aszs�rammraraaaszr�lra>zs�aa�za � SRE'N "*0001oEEoRI0000la00000p13 GIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 A 1il IHH I I II 11 I •• I f I I I I ••• _ 1 NRNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNN slags as as a§ o m m 5 9 w EEEVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Ir-1 1 gg.gsgggggggggggggggggg R..., R•RRRRRR•R•RR•RRR•R—„, gml , , 44 Hm 00000a00000a000a000 m to I CO y U J III III IIII II IIII II III IIIIIIIIII II II III II IIIIIIIIIIIIII „z 0 ' mz �1 z 0 _73 0 I-- =Trrt � � ° m 0 al o 7 .73 o Oct —I m �C rn pm r f o g s �s � mP• I DEVELOPMENri PL!-'•,Cd'1lCJG CITY OF RE iNNTON AUG-1-88199 � de i �� • ( •;'i't�•. ,�?i. .. • 13 1 'I<; :I a,000a2.owc ,cta,; :^• ri` .. j • NOTES 75- '�i I� a i-@ s �TO 5W 16th S•1 RE T •�., —�.--—�: { - ... _ i: •`•::,.:C•- ;;{,. ._. ........_... ::•: _•J—I'' -, - �;,.I ./ 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL i j i rJ • - '•'ll _ _ 'af, INFORMATION,SEE - t.1 -i� El U f � .i .#�.. .,' • • 15 N II It ,t`, *`,o`• „r -+;- 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING tt:{� K.1- __ __ ; NOTES AND SYMBOLS. ;.) __ ?, { ,..•.7':•;:.; SEE DRAWINGS G} —¢¢ `'{J' ,/,y,. - ..}.',. did} • r� - i-:. ,.� AND G4. as _ !i £y? ti'':;. 1 .t1 i i _ r•• I,,,,� {' '..1 • '?• �I;,, 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOUTIONEROSIN Z u U `I • P Yf AND TEMPORARY ENT N 1 Ili-w i'ri SO :, •:-„v.... f' t:ii"^;:r::+':`:�i:;: �:'•'::i;t i, SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ••.•••• ,, NOTES,SEE DRAWING 1 j il:, , ... i:iBLBo1. wz -o 1 EXI;TIN { ` ,.is. ,A S4G I 5 f•. i `\ CONTRACTOR TA I •-�� STAGING, NG EE _ w 11 - 1.s a'r - LAYOTRA AND STORAGE �� CST POND , ,,., .`�•• - ;7; ai C7 - {7 :-F'. �•.,,[r r�a.t.-"- - AREA.CONTRACTOR SHALL a6 w :,cv M1 .:�: tt;�.� z I 1 ',P .+:" �'"' �.5::�.•_... PREVENT TRANSPORT OF { • .... : sue.- 8. j `,� i}, _ _. 2 0 ¢ 1 • t. SEDIMENT TO EXISTING L �3 1 I . i I ,i`•� i:��i.:l.: %.:t. DRAINAGE SYSTEMSIN fn l i`N ss, s.s s ss,.s.,s,.s.. 'i •,`:1; :�:i"`�r'{t :J=�s' ._�:::s-._ _ �,t GE EW Z •• I?PR:I DSED -..I:'' NI:,:L }•q•'ii''%- ACCORDANCE WRH SPECIFI- Z-U 1 6 ,; { :: 13`', _ _ - CATION 02710. Il T POND S I t:gym •SC :�, .JS",{mr...................................- �•I..-.�,jy��.--'::_i ii::::;{;':i��� 1 CONSTRUCTION HAUL '� to .'y,�` ! i < ,'ir#,:17"`i':;-p:;t: I• % ROUTES NOT SHOWN. EN4f@17`6EMEPFf; ;:._ �� hj •iii I a� 7t•1, ,•.I ,5_P� --i::•' ,:,--�'":<'i:' ^,1 i•, CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT _ TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT I I ..� • ;e ?( +' AND DEBRIS BEYOND PROJECT { • LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH g ,�, : .,- �"' `v. ;.I.-- 2 5 SPECIFICATION 02710. 0o aE 'I.I; ;I: I 31.,+ fa,:�s -::: �s :, T. T: 'r. - '`" >"'z s"W ly i i, Y#srK s.. - - �:i,,2`' "i<u'{ iii'!i": ;(' i •:.r--+o I [r •: ,�Yl �- J.J"-1 R,I^Ltl` :ib -.;ai ; , !! 1 1 Jlr j� N U .•r :,I I: ; ll> �✓#!d.f,,"�+f.'d-f ^-- .�%/ .a tF.,;:• :;-I i` -.,4, 1 I: ... g # I !�� �e �.. � ., % I st: L. ......;.;:i t�.l' !` { `25-10i.,: I II P:•�SPOSED`;{;• 1111, 4 .: -/ . E_";' 25-20 `,;--�;_ <y1 a's W (POND e 1 1' Ii' t:•t• %`.,r ^�e: 'ij 1 .I 'i•' :i, { d 'MENTION, ��.�ti�?=� ,� / -�:<_-i`r'•V`' `' E:°:'.j ,',`•' •:��� ;�'-,- ii;; ; r I r- I � : {. : 1. 1 k• i;:1Ji e 3 `x1 f d' �I 'I' la%r — - it 1� - _ __ rr J 1- — II I , °I t 1 11 'I � �: + t. ( k: tV �1 �• I' 1 , K,r "ti ,I fit• r r 1 4� f/.�Ir' � 1� I 1' 1 i , is '� i{:f:::. Sq./ E.; Eli ,...• 'i l :ii. : _ "N I I•� .L•10 �/t1 prA i 1... •, .., E. ,I.1. : , I ..:I i r.: 1 r - J. , • II�.`•. 0444,./ /A r I ! Off r t c • 1 E ,{ .S > I i" rT Rr4 if ,,{ ..,,.. w wji : • cagatIA :.;.: : . . .:. 1 I•: : . <I �,1 ,I I M1'�: <:<;;:: -L:;,,:_ _ - - I.' - aoI { is ,i-��-'"--�aari� :i l!1�t;�';- 7 am :I:(. I I.:`L-_-t\\ ..� ;tt: ; -- - ice-,:.ri I - -� �? - - - - 1MI al -- I \. _ n Ta t s� 11 � �� = I i= 40 mm�i ,, 3 ':t,lt /: 1,''jl1 1 ,�'p - : ) • - U '1 'I ; KEY PLAN a tfl'. �:J.r'1 y - .'.'.,It :`'..:. „1,n I i{ f __ 1.11 ',�, .:I.f` �''S.'.- - - _ 1'� .l — 1. •/ :1' lif• Al 11;' ft. ' '' I, 1 � :,:▪ ' i z I!' SI 5CL L R 3 i{i1, I ii ''..;:, L,-... `,'`'' ::"4-;:. "t:.,;:, :'f' i I w _ r PERMIT SET 41 =, o '.I /'•L::-\�+''' _ •'`:• r... f ., ;-:• '\" 41 I p \ Qom'. ..- T. bW 27thi STREET.- �' 2:'::_. ...' "+; is- tN6ii3 45 :, I li '., (� � I 1Do'so' 0 100' 200' ` s `�}d �. �, i•• ,• - NI 0=VPIOPMENT PU--NNIIVIG. CITY OF RENTON - AUG 1 8 1998 RECEIVED C510002cLORG IGIGH7 :7 \ '--'----II:._ ------ ''--- V 1:----, -..--•V:-.62.,i4,,,-:i4- :9° Z./..,\W..\\,. ,rocPscV ia, / \ . -..-...... .. .„ i c,.1 i.f,.,:-:-,•.4:cf-A-A .; .....-:,; ,,...."..,.;.\\.;',,,/ tr ‘-,r7,!°-'s 7/ , coni Du rS i 1 I V)1 cuLyr.W..'541,-.51;;:,.-4-4-53 IS,,,u vE,,,,., -...I '',„%.,',,,,,,, \-,:.;\ ru<a.10 A9M, :,1;:so Li. ,:,1 It / r•1_,... .1.17,11.„0,0 COLE'01P.P.C.NE1\. • 1‘1• 1 , 1 „.,. , (Eu)„,ut--.;....• ,./„,,,,,,.;•..., „.,:::,1 .:...,..„. 0,)..._ n, . 5‘.,.., ..\•., N.7,;,,,,ti 8; 8 / z.V.... 7/7/se.„--• _____ ...?/f/sa \ , \ ,, ,. , . A 4 6 0 \.-11•A,.,.,.‘,.‘,..,,‘\‘‘.1..... '""!:Pa /11.i/ ..,ZI /<12/ „.....r,-1,,,.--.1--. -.1.-1-,.,:',...1,, 1,A\ , 11 ;:1 \ 1'.. •a , ,t, , ., SOHN 04 W/••••RAN-1 GRA TO \ ,.. :. Ey21 'it: 0,,EL.,\:.,'..,\,„ ./ .o,,,.n.701,,,,,6;f..,,,„01., / /1'.qc:octrICYAIrc-.cacs =10.25 • .... : 10:G T1M141.M , . \ -.... NOTES; t3' I i •-...:,. .,\,I, \ .-,-,-;"/,, -•,••••,,e .. ,„ ,• •,• , • / • •• •• • \\\ • .. ..-•!-, % , \\\% •••:,..,'$. .% \ . ••• • .....,......._ i putw a. . '0,4' ;t•',..----jar .... si I; I if i: N. 4 91"9 i r $ ,$) ;-- ,,,,cp.. ,,$ v.,:••,.#..-_-..--,:;.:s.,\•--;-„,,,i ::, $ :i$,/ .,;, ... . \ N INFORMATION.SEE 0 LI .. , --D 'k--- I,'',,‘ i! e! 'i I , r i 1 , , ,\ ,,p 1. , . . DRAWING G4. g .< Z- . \ ; :t . i /..-----"Th \..--, ---\• W.114/ .l'1 f 1/! ,,,.., 1•,.•z - §E w•$ 9•0 cavERT i :: \ N, 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING RCP(SW) \...,,\'...\;;;„_--,t,---. - . ".'---.,.._..,.. NOTES AND SYMBOLS, 0 re I..2 C--/ I t 1 LAKE 1' \I;Pi '' 1' 11'1 '1'. ''' 4 1:1‘1111;11..'''l t;; 1 i;i C1EUL.16 B OP 0 VW)-6.52 1. 1.-',..-1,06 :If A i i ! : i 1 1 warm a.-9.57 , SEE DRAWINGS G3 S1.5111.,1 : i ;1,1'1.'1 i r5.111'- .'.E-li°.--'L i 1.-;' - ..111 1 : ; ; rfEc'•;.,n,'„ ,DIA.SSCO/Aumecoir.k.3 % •`-...,.. AND G4. La a ,-..g ..., -----c--y 1 •'•• t rm4-----x-3t:-fit4 9=.5' 1; 1 f ,711 ii." ,./;. 1 i i °ME'6/2/98 UNABLE TO MEASURE I I 1 1., 0-u u.OF WATER) .., ','1 • 1...4:'2, .„ , ..,......--- V) ._-..___. 3.FOR GRADING NOTES,SEE \ P 2 6 2..L. . ,• , --. • ;1 s : : , ....._...._•__. DRAWING I C(G)800 • 'I ' •,..k. • : \ 1 4?E•c‹, . • • , : : i , ....„_. 4.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND L m 8:',- " .1 / ... 'T %• 8 • z.5 ota x L1.4 ABOVE GROUND ---.. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE •,-- ! ..• ,`-' t .= 1. 4,f, , • i TOP OE P.VO EL.=1E, ....._.. FINISH GRADE REFER TO 11.5 w ' \\ 1/I',LN•c alsE / ' od'I I 1 ' ',...i.:1 - 11 1 1 11 -.- --- LANDSCAPE PLANS TO _. el 5 , , . • .... , -........._ ---• ••• DETERMINE SUB GRADE ' 1 i , t o. -0°- 9,.1\I.,‘ 1 r4v-E&IE.)=6.62 ELEVATIONS. 1 ii:-R . • : 1 : : / A -4,. n i 1 (-' \\,Ill\.I 5.AREAS TO RECEIVE 6" ,N2 NAN MRS 14 72,400 IMPORT TOPSOIL TO BE g EL=Z .0 61 72.400 ; i ./ 1 i Y I,,08. I .I I'l i • +I'I \\.,\,.\\\..\ry.<... I.TK CONSTRUCTED 6-BELOW _.,2 0 0 ..;E 1 . .1''' -/ : .4, ti-1 I,1: •i 1'I FINISH GRADE FINAL 6'OF TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED R, E-• i C'‘ `,1 . 1\‘,1 I I \\\\`,...,:::::„N. \y. >-.Z Ui • • • 8 l'•' 8 I / ,..) DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ...... E-8r,,4 ,r.8•2 : :: • I I LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO %, A I, \i I .,\.. ‘ f ! 0 i % 1,1.t %. 1 1\ki.I.1 , _.„...--- RECEIVE TOPSOIL DENOTED .----- , WITH HATCHING. rz, $4 :,s i,'''‘‘,. \ ‘1.,1,1 ,; r • ' r I ,.,)'._.\,1,.V9",0,A11 51rOPERA RON ,, . %' Ilii,,,,.:,,. •.'iti,.._....-:',11 (31,1 0121':.,::,...' ..,,,„ ,,,,.1 4,„,'1,'.W1AVAJVT E 1- "7 1.1g -11 • : ..': ! i? ._ . $i I ct, '1,,.. ,,Y,' \t,'\ ,\ POND .., •.. .-... '-.. • -.. .._.......-. _.....-.... ......^--. __.......-- 4 Ai- ( „ i I e - .I. I! .,'1,, .11,‘'', 1• /‘. ----- ._.......- _.....-.•- h •10, I R .? \ nt\‘,‘\\ -..._..-- -; t ,•g \'t,\1 \ s ______. _••-- 11 _F • • , ,, ; , ,, , „, -.-,,, ......., "ANN"POND ;:tE-65• •••'-,- .:t-i I '‘,. I. \ ,.. k " ot°t • 1: , : • l : 1 Il • I \ - '-'.. • It \ 1.‘ k,\' \ 1 I I:IA'''. . i 1., ':, \ 1,. ••',. \11 ' CEO (EN= ,s., _ 1 7;5 •„tuY A BOR... K,,._1 ,y,, ..,, 7 0; .• 1'2 1: 1 it 1.11 , ,,n, '2 •91!_i1' It 'i-11', 1-i:.,., ;' 1 ,',_....%‘.5 • , • 1 1 ,. 11----1 15,,. I . . . 1. 1 11- 1''''-'1 1 '‘ 1'1• -A- '.•'.,,‘ ,-DIA SSC./KERA EON 11'. 1 I C•4 ",111-. _.‘11, 1:11.1:\ \4\1,...*:1,:1\\1'.PP4 VAT E L=9.15 i 3 V 1 IMICI" ' IIIII i : • : \ 1 i .4. ' \\ n• i t t t t\t\ 2{:trilee". ' • ..._..... . ki. ,.,:i • \ , . x".\ , , . , E i \ . . .Y, I 1 ;1: . ,,.\,. i '-'::',, ''.4, .1.',/.:00;•, 'N,46.,:,..:2.,:•,...•,,, 11 1 : , liroiel ., 6.,kt •7 68 6 20 i ry 2,2o0 711 If: 57: 571 :55 Ku KAN g i IA E.24A 21.Itt.IUL sc..MC 1 LIASC2ILYL,Rf...111 F.3 6 • I PERMIT SET I F., I 0.:07.27.98 I -- - - 2PLJ _.2 ow 40' I [ g .L.:::\lEicliA11"_8_10,,TY°P1\6'1EFI'FI[PENLI G -rgi''14''' ic REcEiVED C5100026.DWG 1C(C)22 1 § N 72,200 110. ,,, \ ''''••-•. '''''.. 1. .:\ g '..-.1 i I'1 1 1L-2 1 I i ; 1 1 •111 V.11..‘" ..:••• ::.),\ .1, \\\.:1•,. \ L.C.-.. i 1 . N ill - f V \ , . \\\ , 8 i ,,:,I - '' \ i - fl!'• , (•", '' '' ' \\ i l'. 4, 1 -4, Wit ••,,i, •• v 1 ‘), \•••\ N...,... ., , 1, ,i) 1 \\ (..). \ CA\ ,:\ \ \\\ :•‘.\X\ "MAN"POND NOTES; g 111 6 EP_ - a r 'm la, : •1: • . I Ilam, .I \ 0' (:7:\:: \\ \ \\'.:::\\ -; ss."':74f4" 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL INFORMATION.SEE `g6 L'.- L.,cczi DRAWING G4. 11_15 p, ) ., ''.4-°' I- ...:g.•,•„:. / / i ; 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING Mtn 22 . NOTES AND SYMBOLS, (..2.45. i ,.°14.. ' SEE DRAWINGS 03 fre .../,,1 r •:!, * ' AND C4. 'Zi VI W a (2 6 (I.I ---------.' ti..1. li / i - 1 ( • \ I l't : 3.FOR GRADING NOTES,SEE F 11. 9 •. t ; !i-- 1',1 ... '•,, ' %\ . ...,.','.. '''';',4.,;°. .!!'21•T-1,1.'?..`'...‹. DRAWING 'IMMO : •' I --'.... . ,31. \ \ ......„••4.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND L I - I I; 0,......V ..... SPOT ELEVATIONS TIRE 1 •rj ,•;:•'.:2-••••• ••:' i >: . . :f) . -... ........V"""---- .------ FINISH GRADE REFER TO ..--.•••••/...1 ,..A. I'''''.. ' 'I. ----- --- LANDSCAPE PLANS TO I \ --.--_-...----"'Z..---."----..- DETERMINE SUB GRADE ICI 5 i I lil r rr ....,.-..i jli .. ,., ,,-,,, \ I i i i .:_-:. r t •,....., f.:-;.: ••,-......C:;,.• --9-5A.,..,5;./Xt-lA...17,,,,--.5.AREAS TO RECEIVE 6" , ' . '..._ .-- LT:2.._.::::1<proir,1,7.XZEff'.2,2 ....:•vrp„..,;.,tvr•LL_7„, IMPORT TOPSOIL TO BE g ' I .- COTL) h ' ;i I.. / ---.., - -- . ...- -- CONSTRUCTED 64 BELOW‘ 1 ,. ..---••---- - FINISH GRADE.FINAL 6"OF . (.. , I - 1 ! ! ! e , "-, -,,,-;" •-e•,' ' 3.... .. ..-1Tf-Ce---05,--- 'y---/s--"". - - — TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED _-,_._........'.... -......4,-,.................,..,.-_,...7..;..,............r....,.: cazipsccmsg4Nss.ri,zifTion.iroor k '''g•(*Tr:4 ' .-._..-.--.. ;9`8*---',.-••.(...,. ------ -....' - - RECEIVE TOPSOIL DENOTED C.>W 11 •Th, ...t: :;.1 i It-4,-,-24-,1__, ,_,,2,1__„_ORCEL I,i4:A•,.f, --* • _ ,,• 051- WiTH HATCHING: v g '2*,.,, ,,g, i• i • i; I ../ ,• ----- ,, - () ..., --77:-....... _.e•rii: ••••• ..,,.;- 7;------,•ii''.::—•.. — ''' .." ... ,. fru IF 1 i li ( / / ....... • ....,_..... „. ..... , „...„-• . i ft.:71-- ..._1_. * \ / c•-6. ,4 72,000 :. 1 -.. I - -..-.. . .. .- ....,....,-----• ! I; •1iji. \I::• ': - --- "-".- ''''• 2?j. ,.:'''--(f./... ..,y(\iiLAND"13" -••••••••-- • _...• ,.•-. .---- ' ." '.•' ..-• BOUNDAR, ....---- ,.. 114.-'?' ''''-•-./2.• ,:.... ! !1,:ii;. ,ii • .39---e-'1' \-r'17 07 . . , i .•-...SS , 10.9.1 .„!...:!.:.,'.'•.,.1:::':f .r.''q4.'f!.f.'";',.. .::',!.,7'.4 1 ' S" 1 ' " 1 it il I- .-;.:;;.:.;,:..„.,::-.,::.;:,..;-,r....,..,.: .- ........._. _......_........._. . _.. . 6 i PI ..-.'"lii - I .; •:li ; ....'"--. .-"-../..;' •.' • . .. .,. ... /.-;:"..- I ' ; • I : , :: i •:•:, ;i: , ?,, , 1 i .. 1 !?-71-1-4., • 'c.."••• ., ....... ..- ,,,..-• .!:,•: 0 ,..---- _..... / i ..; ...„... E / ', _..,' • W . I . ..... . ::'<':N-:•„:::.,,N_,.: - - -a`i.V11 1 -- ,.... -___i_ .... ........„....,....:....c,.. „,.. - i •..,.... - — -...- .. Plkil62/11,- •-. POD,A Y i , /I • .0! it ". ' ! :::;17..........„.. c, I ,.. % ',..... , ElMrrgrIll, .-- RaliErar.r.411 /t .... I I 1 i A 1:; IV •'. .. \ ,A , : : .. , ..... ... rill IN 'A 6 21".-10•11-01.1,..-2-.....-2 ---- 40. 7....... :k7.*.1.13.. 1,R. :05 - lg. 1 63 61 65 8.- N A- •7 68 6 70 C''c! 71 72 73 7 75 r PERMIT SET 1 —KernAN L DATE 07.27.98 J I g • DEVELOPMENT PLAN i.,,IG CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1993 RECEFVE-D C5100027.DWG 1C(C)25 I /1 ‘3T• .• 9•DIA.sscop.r..noN .„. N. n •,., f:,, ---,..... .,'.....',Ni:,.',..:::...,;',,.,,:!g ir2 1 1 I lir-2 1 L., / ..., „...., s.• : ...1 .• N ..-' 4 8 '4.5 , 7.c.'•-:".,1s,/------,-1 ,LI; -.'1, ° ,..‹.9,iy.t.'s.s.r.i.:›rianoN ,..... e 99,2.5.--B).2.VALVE •-• EL FE .,..- ' ;.;..:',j'1:11:1'1. 1:•t• \ , \ Vie- rany ,.„,,.. /1 ;,..„,..,/ ,-• ,,,..-" --- ,,-,•' C.)•--- g lh En ./. ...........,,./.., ./ --. . ' NOTES ... ." -, 4 I/t: FENCE ./ • x.C1,.1,. •••:.•'1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL ,.... .... ......- 0,,,,t` .....,...--"' ,,,,,,,.....,:".., „so. 0 .,-// '' -----nfL X 0.2'ABOVE GROUND / ..':' DRAWING G4. INFORMATION SEE t.za zcq . ..- TOP or PVC EL=IJ.19 ii.1 Es i 2,2 •,.....4,,,..6; „.. ce ---' ---."---0- / / , .. At,:.7..,....,.„--;17-.- .,../..../.. .: --.11-71...,',../..',*„...,,,,-- . — —.. : .• ,• / NOTES AND SYMBOLS, „I / \, ... ..k:- s:.f ....% \ SEE DRAWINGS G3 z t...1 i El tzt 1-22. #-.•::".. ..---"----.7.-32-r pg',,r,.'fir" ....- -- -7 AND G4. 0 -'1".c.'t 0 ., ..P •6° .,„/......-- ....- .... .•',TOP VA!E.EL•f1,J2 • .." . . , x ,,,,,,,,,,,,...2T,, \.... :•#•.:,s' ,.......k.,::,,,s., ,..., / 3.r)ORIA2wIRGAOINc?G;0010ES.SEE ...,. ..1^t:V.:.p..t.: ••• • •• /_/...--....:;-...:.,,,:::;C.,.;— r.'' ...-'..c,, AREA UNDER f,.... '....I.'..' . '....I. ,./ '.i.-)-'.---- \''''''1, CONSTRUCTION ..r.„,,,/,.;•• \ .....„.. ,,,,,,, ,,,,., 4.I;21,..0eEDA.GG0NNTsOUARRSE AND 1 •-, o i --•--. FINISH GRADE.REFER TO CD 15 ,....--__. .-....- . • .. z .'.) ,..-- ,.. '..f.A--.,, VET2ILIN LB g T°E ... . ....- ' /i/ -•4 •. \ „I...4.4;s ''..,.. ELEvATIONS. g ‘D --- ...--‘.. ":';5:-...s, / ::.; 4, 0,\\;,.. ty.r; •5.AREAS TO RECEfVE•6- .._ ....---•• i-"` ..,--- \'7.)Of „ ,1- / t .--,'• Aff 4 _ . .. .,.......„,..._:..."‘., 11... .. ...., CONSTRUCTED 6-BELOIY *69°' 6,.e„, (_, 0,..e. V., -....., TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED ..„----- _-- / .' i/ / ..../ .,../: 4 '. • • ., -, DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ----4- ..._-.".--' i i •\, , ' .7. :,--Ns r"; '•4 , - LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO ..I.--6'''''------''..,..,' ----,=:. I..",I ..F.:,--....CI..„..---.:•---- ;;;'''.---- ..."':-.."-)/ RECEIVE TOPSOIL DENOTED WITH HATCHING: r (..-.).' 4. (-.,..)4 .-- 0....4. (,)„,,,, ...k-,,' / .:..,a.9 t.... , 1/4, .)(0,` ,.._______.7_,... 0 . 0,a. 04- , - ---....,_, : /c...;.:•-7V)' i A tg - .. 1 i N 72,000 /.0.*.—......./'—..............•.... /.••••f-••••... ....A L........_ f..:)i ). — - ,,, --- . ,--, ,fi( i 1 ,...,, -----' , .011NDARY ,. AREA UNDER , /..... ..---..,.." -...-....i' CONSTRUCTION _ .,.....--- 1 .• ..; . '• ) li:'i III ; i .1! _.......--• / ----- -- • ../ •,' , . '... • • • • • - •• i , - • ' • -/- '41- „-.-- i ..W;'7•.. , :-... i ;If , .--'----- 1 -., .-''. ';;:' =_ .' C: • =_.' i...,, ." .1....-4?'' f • ''• ..' :.•" ) • •••-' -. 1111 I--i) / / e — /1 . •. . , . . , k , ;:i • ," r . _ 5 ---..,‘ „ ,• .....,. ... ,k: • W, ......" c 4,,,. .. .t. . ;6'CONSTRUCtTS ., ,. ( •-•) . ••...—"------.....:-....--•,•"•'-':. - :f:..... ...\•.:1-.3..! ,,•1..t.!i it. .1 • 1.;;, t , I 1 •t• ..- r ; 0. . . . ,- ...,„.1-5;•:---;---------- •-•,.....:.....,:•;::,-,-;::-..n...izi,ei..- ,;. 111,r.--.7,_—:, , 5 ..., _... ... •,t,t' L;..,..... L _42_L,___.6,) 60 • T 1., i i •Z';'," ....__•-......-.••••• . ,..•-• • /' g•'... •11 `,.. ... ...„,.,' t. 6 63 6, 65 ,•-, :i IV... -. /."..... i „•• 1..i:•_.:f..D i Ni c. 2...:.—2 f..; ---..A ., . ,a 2 ./ • • . ; t • ;.; I, . ) i L... . N 7,50 7 72 73 7 75 i, •:, ; KEY PLAN 1/2.SIE 21.E11.11.1.,111. ........, 8 6 ., 2 I 1/2.SOL 25.1.21/.1.ILIUL g r- PERMIT SET 1 zu _ L Dom 07.27.88 J • 2P Z 4 20 4Y_ :2 _ Inimmi-— 1 g DENIP CITY OF RE TO AUG 18 1003 GENE® r C5100032.DW0 10(0)27 IV 6 'I I j,�I,I �p)PIr,1l ,t t I'V @ rl l r,,, ,), r 7.j., bIFI I i /\ • i r,; t i� 1IIj' • p Q 0_ N 71.50� 1 ,I 1. I. NI -- - ;ih �'1l - ! 191$ Wd 1 C:: IY: Ij �� h V'tl' • �� U2 i r• :i .. xrw-n w-e0 / a w j a i r , s. NOTES; • A w CL r. ) I i • i I`1rt' (: ? n ,.FOR SURVEY CONTROL $��o,¢ p2 N I E 4 I ! (; ,I 't )' /'•• _ %'• m i. INFORMATION,SEE DRAWIN§V 3§ ¢2 r I 1 ii!;:, '�1 WE NO'9" '-:ice �, zLr O )' 'j` j ';> BOU DART %'✓ 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING ,:I, if- ,r'• W /�, NOTES AND SYMBOLS, �< 1' •{ !_ I'' r! •! AND DSEE RAWINGS G3 L 3 to 4 ``'= `. t. F 9U zw j • r - _ ,.5'� O 3.FOR GR4.ADIN(;NOTES,SEE r G 7pLL { t 1 >- DRAWING 1CG600 i 1 p :gym? I. : E i •,y __ ..._.. _...._ _ F; 3 2 IAND t S> N t tt f '_ -- __-' • aSPOT PROPOSEDELEVATONS ARE • a ' %� FINISH GRADE.REFER TO i, ! •'`T"' Er:-._ r' LANDSCAPE DETERMINE PLANS TO UB CRADE I __ _ . - — J - f ELEVATIONS. oo t 1 _ —. . _, AREAS O�z 21 •F. i { • i - S IMPORT TOPSOILI`TO6BE O E i 7 /f. CONSTRUCTED 6'BELOW 'ii >-'Z Li I •I i I ~ � / J TOPSOIL WILL BE INALA644 F I F W a >i I • _ +'` DURING CONSTRUCTION OF F U D: t 1 LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO a a� I _._,_,_ �^ ` RECENE TOPSOIL DENOTED g /I,� m E I I f -_ 9� _ ". . `6 WITH HATCHING: ffT. {\ { 71 si± 11 - i I I � ,31z� � '. I s'—` . _______ _, 6S O ' ��� I • _- , i 1 16.5 I /� cTi lg -�- til�I----],.60d------ ------- ---------- 1 - —• --- U !237: ..,15' . _- ---------- ter. •-- .:'- ;: N;N _ 3'a �! /• : 10 :-'rn: arh�'. '' ; 5 • 8 ++ aa j e :es i,: ::i' + 1 10 t 7 �0 iu 8 • I I •`• /1//i , • —_{_ i___ - till/ - i /f .i •Ci .6 CNS!RCTIONf:• rt so Ti I i/ +_ -I I � !_ s•rfio ' I v, ` //1/1/..„,..;:.:1,;,/,,:..,,:.,/ ' , f / :'1"• 1R� .) fib s 70 txt 2 P. ILI�gC Zit 2X I.VIA K PUN r PERMIT SET aE 07.27.ee J za'—,o'S zo' ao:— CEVEcliTy12, 0I.O;r1L-F-TRITEPi:_i"T:0:1\!lilii SG AUG 18 i'Jz13 • 24 Pi I, r-,,,.,,,„_..._7. . g ._.,...-. , ' e',...-'- . 'I.-'. •w .—, . .1...'s. 0. .. , • .• •. . . .. 7 E.,. C E uED C.51000.33.0wC IC(G)28 _., „ 1 1.,._,11--'D / .s(----...-.._2, / i ‘,A i-j 11E-2 1 ' `"-----":"--- -<-":"..-_---- .--, • ...i'li ' ......:A,,, ' \..'.:, '''''...., ..t.:'-',....i. \ ',.. •',.I.: ‘...,----1",: ,:,'''' e , ..7 •''''' i'.1 I w •• 7 ,'' :P. ',...I., I.. 1 ... i.. t‘''':. \ t. y . ,Y o ../ I \''...., : ••••••" ' • Alit UNDErt.4) .... \ ,....„, :, -..A ... r .0.,.. i ,.- ,,., 71,822 1 / 6'12 '‘ii, .'-.- ••••.?,..4,N • .' ,' . .., NOTES; i --' ....-/ .-- , ...- ; .) 0, ,: Ii ,---,--,.. ,.......ii - ',.‘,1•,.., e !. 0 3 ... I. 1 .il, t,,\ :f: _____' ' 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL INFORMATION,SEE / •::',."---A., / • NOTES AND SYMBOLS, --, \ .:, 1%. .,i BUILDING 25-20 SEE DRAWINGS G3 AND G4.a -1 c, q ,, -- • •„.., , , " : ------ ; liti`±'._, k' ,,/ 3.FOR GRADING NOTES,SEE 1 i!Lc7D2 , -;•,,,,,,,.. ,,, .---A.s..„. \ ,,,/ , ...—.....— .••,•• 4.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND 1 . OjapS ' ,_./ / „....,....-.--- .. . ,......--- --- ...- t....1 • SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE _ , •,...`......31. .i i LANDSCAPE PLANS TO , e-. • -.,....., DETERMINE SUB GRADE 11 / ----. c, ::.------J... --• ' 1'1', . ---:i,' '-' • I, ,; ' ' ; 5.AREAS TO RECErVE 6- 2 r...Z .0 IMPORT TOPSOIL TO BE .,s E .._.-,----7 ' li CONSTRUCTED 6'BELOW ...: FINISH GRADE.FINAL 6-OF :...1 >"' Lf ell ...-".---'7: ---`..-v--- ----------- •• '.-- '' '•'-.7'::-':'---------..-- ! ... ' TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED il •---- .... ..----- -------- ,....-:: :::-.. .::-....:-- ."'"'...:<,----- DURING CONSTRUCTION OF LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO g L)— il // --'.. .-.''''...--'t"""- ,.: RECEfVE TOPSOIL DENOTED a , WITH HATCHING / - ' • f• • .—, .-..„ ....."-:.‘';.-',.;•-..'"'''.-9•';'-ar"" (;:'; j..,..: ‘..,,.) f•:,1,i,,,e"'...,...,-;:::::--;".:-..5----- ._,...•2'-':11..---•:11..,..--1.,,`..f.7::::::::;..,....4"''''.•"--.---.. _............... .//.i./,.i... . "--• ,.;:'"r• 1.:,. '...., .. ...---—..--._,..--•••• II/H •i . H-H • : 1.:.H .' i : • !t1-! * ').: ! ! 1 - i "t - •--...-.-- --•-•.....jr;'''---6.:7 '--... ......,--'5.;:••:;';;:ff:T..:-.::.'....,,:;......,..,„-f,---'• ---- --- ....,.• --:'. '''''="--::----..."-------7.7-_- _..- _ • • ..::::----:":'....,:..:::::.,.--- '"--::::-----::---— -------- ‘ 1. f, -..-.•-•' : :/....,-, ::-:'f.i., .' . ; . . .. • _.-- —"1"1-11\I.:. .1 - / f' i ---. --r-':".i .1 i ..... i _...-•••-...:,-.5Z5''''. !.........S..?.1,27. Z ± :i<; 1 ,11 C........--1---„44-1----------1- - -'-- +-- ----- Z .. _......—......_...... ....,...i , —' s, 1 LEI , Y __..---- !i ..- I e r..1•-' ....r....:;1 „,...__.,--. • lo I -............._ • ''.... F...1 ,,, , NT'X.„.•.,I 1 1 I 1 1 .." 1'''''' •••''..--.. ' ' .4 ' ..,I -1-, ..' .555J 5 1 17 18 Ilk. 2 / / _ I •.5.f: 2 I 22 23.....1.5 ce .- .,•••• • / • i':;./'...• 1 2.‘ .• / ....--'-•-• .4 I PARNINg Lot;ARCA ,,, WILD, :1 : Z• ..---.•-•- ._ ...i 7‘2 .' '=-• ...---' _.,- . \ 0 CONSIRUOION . : ,.....,,,.... \-"ii, • .--••••• i - /"-- i' . .......... ... - -- -- - \,.. . --: - : -- - - . 1 , ..,.. CI • s .... . J -,-- „.1 I / • • r. ::1-'-'kf.: r \ gm,„.. , .s:: -—— .....,.,,i, , ••' 1 1 II; ' ;:k.'1: 3 / .., 65. ..:, 4 L.....] dt, •7 68 6 22 '- I . :2:2.,.1,4 -5 \ , ....5‘•• 1 ,4 ,..,,•• i 1 \ f ,., 75 KEY PLAN 22.— 2 t IA SIC 25.122.1.(E.lit .• 8 r--PE-RMIT SET 1 2511,07.27.98 I 1--- -- 20:jz_2 2010,1 E -- / g • C5100037.040 LE(E)32 i'l 1 . •L ..• , „ 1 , • ' 7,..... i , 1 , ..1 • . , , • • • . , ._ .. / .. , 1 o :i i ,' N • , u .., i ,,•,.,2 1 - ,,./ .• ; i . / ., Y L4 I .- . . :6 / .• ....-- P., . Z li I li , . , / ,6 2..' :-.:- / , /,/ 1/ ,;:'''; .X..-- i L,../ / z 52 z n 4 0.L._ EL ::•- I•- 1 i i • ...:: ti . •;:' ..../' / .' NOTES; ; : ... ----/ ,, 1 , rENCE • I.FOR SURVEY CONTROL INFORMATION.SEE r. „ t : i I 44,4: . t , 1 V. ' • :• • - • ;•• .... ' .., /I ,i i .." ,...,..- DRAWING G4. §D:ES i r ce 1 I ! , ------ ... / / 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING „ • •-- . ....". ../ NOTES AND SYMBOLS. 6-D . : .....• , „.•-• ?4 I SEE DRAWINGS 03 Z ut • , .. •-'.4 5, 14>Lam i! : . ,.., ,. :I • . :: F Zd 2,1 .1: . • ' 1 ' g ;7 1 / 1 ;:1 /I i / N'A'3.;NO::FL%DING NOTES.SEE $14 - '•- , . • • I/ I .'''.; •/, Ll e , 11 r'''\ ' ...- _ —,. . __..., DRAWING I C(G)800 : go.00 A. i. I -. . .• , , . .• •.: / / ,4 , , \„ ,..... _.... 4.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND i •:.' n 1 ii.r.; ! .4i ' i ... ?1:::•?1 .1 I I s.i II -- . . •.—.....••• SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE _____..... 't I FINISH GRADE REFER TO ' f 1 1 i !, ..,1.., LANDSCAPE PLANS TO el C; • . •. ; . . • „... i - • ••.•', : ;; • / ' 1 i i!.i -- -, _ DETERMINE SUB GRADE 1 .._.,,_••-,.-..ii ' , •• / 1:. I j : : ; ',I ii'. . ELEVATiONS B zi:...,• .• . i AL? • \ :i Ii, i : • • ! IE 09-6 09-..s1 .:;4-4-,..;4;,-,:.5.AREAS TO RECEIVE 6' 2 •*-,,..,Z pi i . • 1 II HI ,,::i:-,f3:•:- • IMPORT TOPSOIL TO BE •/ ; / ; / f „"' : , •• - CONSTRUCTED 6"BELOW 24 .....0 s,E il I •L, . I I I I . . 1, i i ; •; Sf,? i . ,i,, ,:.,.. , RIP-RAp..../, - f:'..SL.N FINISH GEtADE.FINAL 6"OF I I ,. „i „ I i j„:I:t t t i : TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED Z Li . : i I i' . ' ; i i ,•;;:! ,... ; i I I _ . • i . DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ...... 47 ti..; ,..L i f I . '---- • - -' / • ; ; t Iliii3 , 1 . . • : LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO 1 ,J WREITCHEWERATTc0HPiNSGDIL vDENOTED 1 C-)C4 11 i i : ' • : -"..., ' i i / i lih.Lif I (I/ .• ..•-••••-• I t., : • i 1 I \ . ; !Y.*/ 1 " : / I I' I •. • 4.-- ' =• A IPTI 1.1 • -- 1 g . ; i; i • ! ;;; 'f i g - . i : •: • , —, . , \_1 • : '; E> • i i i !.! 1 .., ...:-, i ii 1 ; 't POND SHALL NOT BE • ' • ' 1 • ' I.-, t • 1.. I L FILLED UNTILL PROPOSED :.: I 14 . ' i 1.PONO illi AEU' i 1 , . . I i ! : 1.i:! : ; MICR Cl-6 9 .• STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM : II.44.14i.7/9/98 .i.: '. IS APPROVED BY OWNER. q \kir I\ 34 . I I; . . .. •1 I . ::I 4 • L ! 'iii• ; • t 1 I 1 . ' \ . ; 4 . \: • I ' i '1? 1 1 i , i i • • ". 1 i i i . • i ,.• r \ I . ',4 i \ .i , I ) 1 Y1 \ , !: • • . I, , ,- I ..; : i ':.;•:,,. ! 1 . i . . 1 I , I ; k ' '.\1:-.--1—-WEVAND"1-1" ; • • I, ; . 1 '1.,:i:::. I I ,, : , I . : . : ; 1 • 1 ; 1 .. ; n‘ EiCrtikl.fyRY \ 1I II,Is:1) il11‘''1,1 it •!i?‘ - :::..•-:...":1/ .. 11711"-- -.111151rjitttOlfi El;II u i u . 1 N • % , : • ‘,: ; i •-, • I , 1,.:' I.. • / •••• 21.IR, i ::: • • , . i • ‘ . -' i : st,\ \ \ .0`.. [IT(5)=PIsi 1 .......,ir. II ' a i t -- ".41141 I ., • I n '• ' n" 'e.,...,v . • : ; 1i 15 10 1 I i !i ,• t • • '..,., I I _ "7 ., 0.,..., . • im• 0 -I '•• \ \ .:‘.%•::.•:::,.;74.14::.!.i.::::.:-:.::-.::::.-1,r;t2•6:0:. .1171,FRET'rill) if .. RIF-62,•11-1 .4,Y6•:I4•.:i.•••g7,:•...,".".1 1 I I ni 71.2,00 li i • ,,, i ' ' '. \.: 4\ \ . 1 .1. ...o' • .1 to 1 ,,1\\ ;.'{' ! LI\ ......\.. :‘ -......„;„..,\—6"edIATRUCT __„,._..., ... •I k .. cf:.. ....... . . . . . di • .1 ii - -I - .,, : , 1 '-:.:::,. it. .• ,6 : --...:-.::-...,---;v 4.m...i g '011 1 \ \\ ; % , , '''''-1 •In L, .:::7:::',...,.... \••3-'4.. ,i ."',-,,, !i.: ...:'''. '--------. 1.1g.=- 11E/1 I . i 1 A 1 ..., , ., ••• ,' , . •,, N•••••...N:,.,- . .. • (STAND P61=i. 1. '•'!1., •••••.., lerIMEI I El •-•,,i !4.: . •• F-J I a • El , Eil ...,..., ..T , , ,,, .„. ,. , „w eor.o•a FIZN,6.20 I , •\, I•-) \ 1 MEI 7 El .,/ w KEY PLAN r...; 11/ZSM24,L2XJ11,11.11. 6 :g. tyznis.uxti....m. ii - 5: L INTE:07.27.08 J Fr 2 P:2-2:-.9 20' 40: ‘IIIIIIM. I si . _.- _ I / I , •:-a:.. 05100m8.0NVO IC(0)43 �M 96 o i`r .��IS� f :r i ' .. / j a('i, IE 1:-RRCP `• � v W / 1 I I l:• � HR.•'`-�y II :} i y O .M1}; ! WEn ND°J" !,,• r,.-•' I { O.d !t, I I i (I .. BOUNDARY %i'I % •. �: {f PARKING tor AREA I r yl 1 .I wr j I !/ i f: NOTE$° p �gw EL' 1�l 7 .+'t i i.• � `• E • 4 ,ER PANEL _ "- _ CONTROL 0 Imo, -� l,_ I ��,, 1.FOR SURVEY �'• u, Z r7 — ` 7I�' , ?t i/ M 7\ 6,• -• INFORMATION,SEE LT,, - y s.__ f 1. ii y\�y ` oi: {1 r.; i 1 .. _• DRAWING C4. wp G i 'j _ _ J ':,j l� -'-'.. --^' 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING (0¢ R 2 �' ,, ,.. ,r,i s"� ., z wL \'�\ j - Y SEENOTEDRAW DRS AND AWINGS SYMBOLS, �¢ FW N>I,<o0 I+ , 11t I+ j ,.•' __^ >I,soo AND C4. A 7'111. 3 N I ... ( r(I ' I 1" ',1 _- ._rfSEE ?� ` •,I ' .'fN 3.FOR GRADING NOTES, SED CONTOURS AND •50 _...... -- �� ! .! �.�` �'' ''•. _ l A:I I DRAWING IC(G)800 L m� tI PLANS TO '� j t•. ; .Jf7, • .•f; l SPOT PROPOELEVAT ELEVATIONS ARE FINISH GRADE.REFER TO I _ /I I , I 4 DETERMIIANDSCANE SUB'I.I I. -=�t DETERMINE GRADE ' --- ,,j I;:I I, 1 I`I• -'1 ELEVATIONS. ''1 al'oucl IRON 1/ 1::,1 I i I;-_:v ` og I:�C(C)=6.16 I t ? B.AREAS TO RECEIVE TO 6' O RE f / - =_ _i' TOPSOIL BE g E �",iwP-RAP I 111 '- CONSTRUCTED 6'BELOW 4. �y • I;�r ` I _. FINISH GRADE.FINAL 6'OF g.w • EAS TO r z Ilia I %` `-'t TOPSOIL WILL BE PLACED F[i] n'c ;•j : 1/ >> DURING CONSTRUCTION OF U ai §€ • - l I • �I ▪'-/{ RECEIVE TOPSOILLANDSCAP DENOTEDDENOTED g �E I .:I I i `j.: I I ` t� I• K� - .. '• WITH HATCHING: G i. t,i ill I( tt >L l :f _ j i • t� - `POND J,•_ '. ? l .M1. •- --..__ - _ I. M : .,. POW)?ooK w/✓- • `•1 POND SHALL NOT BE j ,? .`:; i �l•, _ z-covOUlI FILLED UNTILL PROPOSED • \ wn TER CL-6.9 i: ;.' y Ii ._ ---_.--_ . /• (No 00) . STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM d •UP • I I.i ........./ ! I { ---�i IS APPROVED BY OWNER. t ,'CON nrOt STORM j 3 6TRULIIIRE7•;! I ' ; ` .• .• -f Isr, It (RASH CRAZE!OP EL -IJ 19 i`�' __ _- ____. 9 �� C Z9"RCP(E) 2ZY . 1 1 i 1, ) _ ._,.{' ,�_____ ,; -- .'• Y j IE 6'PVC(\) k]I I f•1 j I I 1 !- : p. m +.-�......�P-R,w� j;lI•( 1 itI eornn j• • t • _ c3 ��,ylh L, ` ��8�1� f I E 21'RCP6M)- -. I:I IE 24'RCP(E =6.)] 1 -I' ,1 :_;,: ., : `� L �ri' "p''�]• Mandl - _...N')T,,,,...._-.....__ 1 I: I - ]I]00 _�,�filtllt�'�I J 11 ` • I 1 I -:: N , '' : It g , , - i6 i . _-- AREA UNDER "; '�"N4..:5... �Ei �• 1__ ` CONSTRUCTION I ■�� �'�'�ig - IZI EDGE OF PAVEMENT �i ,, y iiiiie; I�= - �E"® n SURVEYED ON NNE 199tl Fr `ty \\ SONN a ' _ --- - EY `�iii///, IE Z1'RCP(W) 906\ w ]I'RCP - � �� guri ei . Z9 RCP - ^ IZI • �t • iLl S II4CKL�if.�U K 0EY Po`N ILIAYCBL71,1.t,U PERMIT SET L _�=o7.z_.a= j -- - - - - - - - --21: 2Q=.9__20' 40: C51000.0.0w0 Ic(0)37 u • 1 11 .1;'.../.1 / m \� e)ea LnNo"I:. /J` •• i Y _ to ;� %�` 1 / I? J 1l`1 ```�, 1 ..�BOL/RDARY �-'f•; ` Z ...:i ( ; \� /' /' Y \ ,1\`\:;�'• cONsiNUCNON-� aw o `ENCC a 3sp gUU g i 1 ° \, NOTES; a �a8 Z CL ; 1 , 1 1 •_ '1 \ / � h, • �'- ,\'.•.1 1 1,FOR SURVEY CONTROL g I(((i N _Z M ) ( l / 0` `� hhh t h 'h1�,` _ INFORMATION,SEE w I 11 •� I I I \.,,• \• 1.,,, u DRAWING G4. a¢ :( .h j ! �'' n i r ;�Ie •` \ •. 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING 03 I. I i s• ` '+ J0 ,`r �!Y �.. \ \"�.'� \I �,2i NOTES AND SYMBOLS, e Z U .- \{ ° f AND GR4AWINCS G3 262� 1 \ '`- _ 7.FOR GRADING NOTES.SEE tl Z w n , v.� I _ DRAWING 0 p 7-ow , _ __ ..�-....._.. --. . I. _ s 1 • j m I % .Jm l e' p - V. • �:_ 4.PROPOSED CON(OURS AND w S) •` • �f'- • .._-.. �- -.t'�[\ M, to 6e .f 1 \ t SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE ®O ! " CONCRETE wAu• tl ' FINISH GRADE.REFER TO A ' _ 1 •, LANDSCAPE PLANS TO it ;file + [ °(- -j ;`ram- y ;. „ - T ae .1 DETERMINE SUB GRADE _ _ •.1 ELEVATIONS. Il a^, j' �[ivvc(sw)=12 C �'` - O - 6 • 5.AREAS TO RECEIVE 6' Cs. - W' -L� t \ u''•""" IMPORT TOPSOIL TO BE gi O O ' , t' CONSTRUCTED 6'BELOW FINISH GRADE.rvIT: r.Z sW I ,{•;I I. r, � r;.-•' .;i:_ _ TOPSOIL WILL BENPLACED F Fw c �/ •'''i °°jp// +t— rl \ ' 1 DURING CONSTRUCTION OF e UO+' S. • 'oft' !�y:.y i t ./%-1, IZ PVL � a \ • LANDSCAPING.AREAS TO ..,� :e\'6 - \ RECEIVE TOPSOIL DENOTED , •'t1itv[i+l �_ ��-"- " 1 \ \ WITH HATCHING: i i �'1 i . 1 .. '� =REM mu. 1tt i \\\ ' \ il'� !' ii _ 11`` 7 ��I `'t -- ! — Q`` — �r • n %`i—-— •',\ .,,I,i • `I,I a1 ttt Ir `�4 v _ _ / I '/". _ I a \ s I'9s 1¢1 ! I t ' f lrrr t I INlI I' ' 1 • f t I ,• ++ 1 • ,', \; 1 • 1 _ X tlo G1 is N 70.00 , . - I '� 1 . . N 70,300 JI 72 JS J1 Ji 50 EC21,L2 x,R E.ill .. .EY SIAS o . I.IP.SEC 2S I.2x,L E.IR ~ r PERMIT SET 1 • I %5100013.DW0 IC(0) o lc - Y -- ' I ! '- NOTES' gv j i: '. 4. t'citiolii '' `- _______ .li.: I 1,FOR SURVEY CONTROL 5 T �l h t �T•' 'T_ INFORMATION,SEE a 0 6t .S RED — i I� i'ii , t .I� N 1DRAWING 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING Yto ' 0.- .i$•J`i , i, -1 .,.�i' NOTES AND SYMBOLS. m 0 AND G4. i — I �( >`... ... - l.;I' -\'t SEE DRAWINGS G3 as .. „ ;- .:\ :.:.::.— J fe -..._ _ - ii(1. - I FORDEMOUTION ps w� 3. GENERAL YE R ION 9 11 W Z ;�`t:. U ' AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ 9 ; W '•,tit - _ • SEDIMENTATION E G SS :` CONTROL 8 - 1•': i - Z 'V:;:•.•v:�...:-:.. ^•fi.'' NOTES SEE DRAWING U ii hI� iit .I .:. 91.1301.i:liLB o Vf1 �d�m w I I ' \\ _..._._ :.:'iri7i �'- ::y"- - 4 CONTRACTOR STAGING. -"U , � �fr•- : - •�=�--- ?,l � LAYDOWN AN T CE EX �iGD s oRA i, .:1;,,'•'''''r. R T A ¢ C _ - AEA.CONTRAC ORS LLN O _T 'P `a N SC' 0 D ,0 C -z w is PREVENT TRANSPORT OF i• =JG. `l.A -I Q I: IM NT TO XI TIN s n... \, SED E E S G fn 'i re.n, 'I s s'�i lI:L '°ro J3 M I I '�' •• FF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS N p I. 8• - - U 'I 1, 'I S - ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFI- i i •t zw I ,. 44 —U Z i `4'� CATION 0 710. W •; S 't\ 7 Q - LL t R `�•. 1 1C'- OUTES TIN•m y1 CONSTRUCTION 0 HAUL l. J ■ 5 g _ ;..j::;;:ice--�• - (: ., r POND ' .. ............ ROUTES NOT SHOWN. rah .. :.:... ........ ................... �. .., m U ( : EN,' ENE T ,\ Z TRANSPORTPOTTR SHALL PREVENT ^/`,. j' / OF SEDIMENT PR .-•'•i.. AND DEBRIS BEYOND PROJECT � �,., . �,.: s...s..,s:: i.: �:: .=..•.: '/ '•.' •. :' ":^� MITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH .. U D CE I 4!I 1 ,L - G '1 SPECIFICATION 02710. �I: • •/� 'I 1t " g f.Z �=11 i �i!Sf'- - ;>T • �4 �a?'...�,y;ayti,,,;9!_ - __ ---- -=.4e••� -'I -._-- a I4to+4 �• �� - W • I; Ili f3: — F / I f I. T a. i 1 a '•1 r - II I ! I 4 .y • � � .....__ I , �' :11 e p11 ,i��...,ei" -ff ,-- . .: . ...:.... - ca :aC:.-:_^w 1I -1 - • .r ne iri i 4i P Ui':. I I. t• ®r •I,r I t, MI Ii 1I � - :::� I• .P 1� :i:2, ::20:� g b OSEDi, ,aA '::::.,;,,-, ) p, I I: p D., I I 1,,— - --1 - 2 6 f '' I �� 4. K 3 0 I it I - I f • 4. ,1 Yi , �I71::I`• .•,it - --- .:fr .J �rr� f ... v!: r3t:, :x ' k: 1� 1.=ia - �:I I� 1 �''••:its. I ..`L. a%k5' - M :f.!• !"..='. of . `` q, 1 ;r i�; i i ~I r � g r Y a � 3 :�� 3 4 r i � t+. ( •I. I. I l !. @ - r IT, 'II .I: J a t:i::�l I I I. r I i pi e r'-i I: 99 p I E !e f 8 E I li• 1i •.1 f�rin/.a11.I .r t I / Cf I r : ' : 't_ ;... j 1 rli:: :I'i ii j - _- .-. .-.-. ..,-.- : J/A. s/'ta�� S�1 r' II . i f I I`'lll,'IE,,.L, r,lhio is � •,,;,1! t ?t i�i 3 I 1�. 2;';b.•r;,.\\ i( :Il i 'I, 'J, ;. a'_ ® — - - , as32 I F <iEj PrimI. fill 1 �. \. :�� t: m m it ; J i III 11 • , I f ::1� f''i' ?ii WI lii J r;, ',`, _< ::'I ._ ©i 1 is S IA Yk M L 2X R RR I'i' ,. . . - _.f~ _ +,i '-,._ %� .' R1/2,4t �[2lLR�. x i. I I : r 6 i III ti.I adi -- j{•`'+ 1 PERMIT SET 1. 1.. �—�, ;i 27th STREE ` • q` ' I ✓ = 44" — — -- >•r..: - I - 100'S0' 0 100' 200' *�y:�+ —. �.^ o !7G•� - -Tti.. _ I' 5 , "N ' �i000qlxwc IC(D)IT AgA NOTES- o]�-- , � , c�1 ��������" DRAWING,^ " CULVEWT o NOTES AND SYMBOLS, �� % �FOR GENERAL DRAWING SEE DRAW NOS GJ U '� � —AND— x 0 �J��X��'_ ; 1 — ` ^FOR STORM DRAINAGE if f SEE DRAWING mm a �� ��� �FOR STORM DRAINAGE *� — ~ , SEE "~=oPROFILES — " oIx if z � � —�'? / / K �� Y DETENTION POND AND � Nj~� WEILAND *> = » ' � / �'` �z All ~ � 91Ito *x —\ 8T�� asal / // ----- � � OP OP ' � 8 �� ' /� 0 n � ~ . ' m��yt AcoLum.mu �� " 72 73 7 s N n '="l;'' S=' C5 cNa I j I : • •, 'i .,/'t •/,'/'.// //.:;,/ / / / / // / / / / / / /0/ / // / / / / / / / /\✓ / / / / / / !72mo/ NOTES•t000szowe uIo722 6 N 72.200 j',I/!I'U Ii I ! { u t 1 C 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL iI /. al:V . :4/''✓ / / / / / // / / / / /4/ // / / / / / / / //`/� / / / / / / / INFORMATION.SEE e r I N7 " :: • ;'' et1 \ /''./.. \•4� %B') / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // // / // / / / / / l\/ / / / / / / DRAWING G4. %9 r I . ! ! .,_., t' �' //• ./'',/•/ / /,:?,/ / / // / / / / / / / / / // // / // / / / / / / /•,/ /c/ / / /2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING w1 ,,j•7.N • , �, \ NOTES AND SYMBOLS, ' iipi ,.', F/ r.`V t , '.t '\ '\,•,,,`'e1.,//\,�//':✓ / / // / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / /\r%y-/.,/ / SEE DRAWINGS G3 a¢ M/'•. I :I I :7':yt- . >,,! 6 J''' %,,c•• .' 1 /'•✓L / / // / / // / / / / / // // / // / // / / / / / %\ •%'/ / AND G4. wF . I 111'[ v �`. / /%'./•.��5•.X<�'•/! / / /v!al..•!nr✓-:/;E / / // // / / / / // / / / // /5 ��`/3.FOR STORM DRANAGE I;..I t �;{ '� '') '� ,••. ,Arff l NOTES,SEE DRAWING t ?i, 4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE C , D Z 2 N ••• `' ii•' •i : `'`� /' n,K/6./ 5 col):1,,..„.../ / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / // 4/.�`•f TRENCH SECTION, '�. •. SEE DRAWING /A•R U C ((aI..S % /:% •••,,\ _ /)� / %:-1 / /// / / // // / / / / / / / / / /// / // /5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE O C7 ••1 1 l:. :.. 't :a" 1• PROFILES.SEE 1 1 j :lC:: �. ,'�� �`.., /.- p / /! l"•:.:/ // / / / // PROPO ED SHEET / / / / / / / / / / / / DRAWINGS_ € OQ •L 3 O r[ r li -- i • I:I : / Q EU Zw N ::- . ,!. 1 :!.).°2:. ;., i I ir 11 I (;i ../ J. //.y.f._/—/-/_/- ../-' 1- t : 1 : r ;,.. ,1i1 !' - / %7""1 T`, :Ii-✓ .} % ...1.°g. - - ._./ % %. .a 1 t. i`,'-,:7: (� / f / %',. ✓ �;✓e/ / 1;_Y!_7 f_7_'% /.//1-/.-/..TL.-L /' Y ` ✓ / 8p 1 I: • .:. / // /'� // / /-/'-/..1.'J_/._/.�'_111.�P•1C`i•AlYf2 �./n./..'k�N01 / Op �'E ! : i �.,` I 4 • \ --/: /'-' / / /. %-{ %•/_ -/•/-✓ / :7'71• -f'" r:%";`- �/-fk...Y" '-f•r/ •!"'/ 5 Id i i 1 % 7" _.fi,' I� %lam:/ /:/.,/ _.c.T✓ / / / 7 T%../../. .7.'..j... / - - - - FW as I :.r,,;. i/ i/ /'/ -.-. / / _ y �' c3 11 /y"— —••—L-••__ ARCE�I.,�. . .... ...... ;J / / -./'''""" i�E rl' 1 '• • / a P�RCEL A+II I:•� —._., — _—o-- _ _ _ �E ;: i ;i a Y:I:I •. !� � a --,�'m,_•/ v,����'%'A'/: JA'�/\/.'JA'/'/'�ti'/"/��,./../L�V�./../..J.•/..X:./.:� --A,,..'J� /-/•- .� _ : I : .. _. -.— G yl .g- 1: j II ' i • - / - ii'�1 f' 1` "• -- / l:: / / / T/T`-/--f-'-ram/-/,/ � :-/-.// /-i'i/ /'/"/ : / / /%� a F. H n.BaoI II I _ I ti a /'// 1 / ., / / / / / / BRDyDS Alcz-/ / / // / / / /- {• .a n ?: - .7:�!' I� _ -�. I RA7JON R IR U TIO 1 1 ,j 1 i : 13, NA,/ o D— �I a Q \ I 1'tf�✓ �'I j 1 (Ill'. PR.POSED ENLAReEMENT'.F CS _ / / /lI /" / U AM'F_/ /./-7/ // / / / / / / / / / / / / h Al t j I ffff f,,l, ` 1:' l.• D EMION POND D W LAND 7/� �� �, ,t/r`r P, t7 �l�f>fff✓ffff77f/6ff `.. 1,1�.. if] .... DE.ICN S RFACE L=8.5 / / / / / / / /4.✓-J./o1 /70,"'�B!/ / / / / / / / / / • / r ..•:_r :/ffff/1ff/a't jt7• i j,` / / / / / / / // y` // // // / // / / / / / i rr 'a :--=`-i'l I .. I • `_:. I�. '1 ff ff ffiif - — / / / IL / / / /;irl / // / /ti/ / / / // / / / e „ •If { :I:ll I /I Yam/ 1/ /�l,/ / / / / / / / /"// / /./.•-/'% / / / % / / y� ! j ! :t I . i .,.„.1 ki..111, \\,...*.. ....,,, ::, ..I/ /Ai// / /,/ // ••'' •'/ / ehl // // /./.I.',/./ Ii, / ,.,/' / / / /.. .-..%/ / 11 o Q 20' 10' 0 20— —,'' 1 8 N gi N II.1/2.SEC.15,I,M.RL 1.11. /I •2 68 6 70 -- rRMIT 71 72 73 I- ]5_ PE SET KEY.PLAN 1 z L arc 07.27.0E 1 C.S100048.DN'C IC(0)20 cA ^6 /N X.z06 / / /d / / / / / /// // / /...//// / /// // L Y�/ / / T/ / / /,GP-7 n-oiA:.„„0/4&Anor ' " .r•:...• 1 +�?'I �:: / •�':+,.2DD :o / / / / / / ' / / / / / / / / // /, ;// / / /.d//////,,V// //r./_/-/_"l:/ -i ,g,,,r�oPcv; /l :,%,L',.3m �i .-•: .:_f- .�`N.,%- iA',3j'i:::°.i:^';:,.. NOTES' I°IP I I..- v- 5f%.A :• �2... t+ \�! . '" .\. i.t 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL / / / // /% / / / / / / / / //''/ // / / /'%./ /.f'ueAT rr{.uua�n-: •y %-Y,./ :� if 10 `sue SEE / � `"'t '�' INFORMATION, / / / / / / / / / / / / / /.A''/.../{ / /Eoc4a/?o4 -. %T �-. / / /' , i�i i`�, ;:''i' .t't, :• °DIA x o.�•rlaovE�cRauNo'` • ' DRAWING C4. yt FS' Sv. `• 1` ;:.'.-•: • tIJ.Je - :2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING V 'r'• _ _ 1r 't ,ti- ._ :���'+,�"`",'�e1 NOTES AND SYMBOLS, yw / // / / / / / / / / //•/ / /•/ /,>/.%.l- ./..;?'`./."/ - - - "/ a �� j F �X Y. ,s`p."_ d T0,aF,%41, 5'F.=T ,/ w / // / // / / / /.././ / / / %/.l,�/;.�i./L .- .. �c `ty ].FOR STORM DRwNACE �Z .! r: �, ;�� i. ';i i..jai+, NOTES,SEE DRAWING i� - a- / / / / / / / /.✓%"/ / / /.//:'/:•%�/i% /: / 1' ,gyp _ Y kg W W J� '�ONSIRI/C IION S{ W g La ,S':y., ;4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE A t /' fU([E .ia W CO r0 %//+7''•// /l�"%':/:I`/ /'/'%'/,.r%/ '�/ /:'% /' i r TRENCH SECTION. - V s N �!� /, Y,?' ;j {' uvrL SEE DRAWING_ � E.11 ` -... / / /.<'"/ / "/ '%'f'•,f/., '/ /:•• / 8 ,• /r�r�144 OIA.Y O S I°,1 LR"" -. a¢¢ 0 4 ` :'Y-.1 a�'i' .� ,:r;"—;I _ raPwl+vcFi-ts.rs ./. ''': SA:V§ K /-:./ %,/",:./ //>+ ,Yi,*jL[1 / /.�' _ i _ .;> '-5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE G /` -l - 0. ;' _ �i.` PROFILES, SEE LU,x / i...r".. %•./•t. • /.:/'/. /:7///, +�:' °' - - - DruWlNcs_ zw g f�/1/ r .f '• �yE" r."s.•:c ,rr.•o-:c.•..o :/ I pQ ce /,..fti.(.'/ %.. `..!':/--)0/'' `co r -ooD/�% /:' il/::; _ :j�,• v ''f t M. •�3 O "•J. .:Uns./Pvc Vr/ /;,r4// •r ••• 0. .1 i __ _.a— ,. T� i.. / 7-O W ` P' POSED 8M:ET _ ! _, .._. L.0) / ,t 'AREA UNDER -/•` �U "/•. �SHQM �P, yp • � ^'1 CON�SIRUCnON j'• % ..._ ›,- -1.d •grf:.2 is/..:://'% / % 'x.•'Y • 3 i•: : .r.,s.. 9, .`.t:i j`••`:•. i" ti � '�r"�O z B rr �, I _E"W as - f;;// / /_.Pc- -/ / /a/ i ;! ° - - ' ''.' j:....`i: .. `- s "a9 ,.: a _ Y �" /..'i // R) /.. -/•>:/ =� a k g /L. / / / / /.i 6 ® ._, _ —— adq `q / / / / /, / /"'/ L p r ND�B" t iJ�-: __ _ _ -' t P / / / / / / OUNDARY ' r.`:1 :"�:l , r/ :AREA UNDER V. PROP ED ENLARGEMENT OF CSTC !•, r --r;.: LDNV/TiUC110 • V { / / / /- / / / D TION POND AND WETLAND .••� v:• %• • ,. . b I� DE GN SURFACE/EL.85 - !r/j I -L.L f / / / !. --,- r N 1, r 4a :a ,:: '' PROPOSED LAKE ! :��:,1,„\`•_t r' 17' �t / / / / '- AERATION/RECIRCULATi,.. ......-...-., ,;: ._.._........., SYSTEM ,._'', - 1 Cr3A '''PP¶. :" - -••, t •t`iti �',••- • I•. ------- -- i- I. il 7 r � o- _ '.. \ ; ',.: \ / :I ':y'coNsrRuciloN �- —�_- .t... .... 't AREA E UNOER'd J CONSTRUCTION•' I�) la-iiii W --\\(r ;. BUILDING" 25-20 >,' -m. t. I ; I . 1f E811 I � gl 4 20' 10' 0 20' 40' � I. �r -/ L SA 1311 • MTTr4 - 5 r pihwAslim r !__ PERMIT SET KEY PLAN o.IF:07.27.98 J P.. .04 ^^^^01 1002\2200\C5100103.DWC "m a"^1GO� m ® wane j�sNmm m„�„„ A BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK CITY OF �ol,oA.ye • "ilk RENTON SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT • F.a Pb /B b y/PUE c WorksD D STORM DRAINAGE PLAN j C1p)27 No, I REVISION BY DATE APPR ^� 'Id 'r Gregg t+^merman P.E,PGmlNatrotor GRID 27 '—a I ., ..,,,n..., ..� p..,• ,-.,,..=•1• x :.....:...:... ._.....,..... .„ ........ ......:.-•:..._.......... . ,..:._-•-••-- III;- _ `x_ I I ...--. __ Er IRR DIP V Dm / Am t I L`ao! SIB '^yC '1 II t m m I;9 • ' z `; i,j t r�,a„ 1, 7 I -., i o .N", \'T'' 'NI II IN• it , 1_:: \ \ ti ' \ �.1. \ i\ \r'' :\ \\ ,�\ \ \\\ \\ \X \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \\ \�� \ \ ? \ V \ \\ ? \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ m \ 7� ,�\ y• \ .\1\ sue' \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \Pt o\ \ \ \ \',\ A� \ \ \ \ \ o\ ! ,.} \o � �,.a, \ • \�\ \ \ \ \ \_-A \ i� 48 SD/ ' \d\ \+ \`• 1 \\ \\-\\ j \ \\ \ -.. C \ \ \ \ \ I. 11 'I1 11 ■ ■ 11 B ■ \ \ 1 ■ \ \ '1:\ \ \ 0\ \ \ \ \ ' 1 ,\ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 \i \ \ \'•, \ \ Sc '' \\ • \ \ \ \ \ 1 /any 7±! FI `\ �\ \ \ \ � '-..,\\ \ \ yd \ \\ \ • f, , \\\�.,\ \\ \ \:.,\ \ \ -\ \\ \� Sc® Immo •-•• /�1 i ////f/� \ \\S\ \ \ '0 \ \P\ Sc \ \ \ \' <y ..,`AIL:, u•.`• \• : \.Ii.: T /. • \ • B to i 0 _11 193� i\ x Al ,:.`'' s \\\ m mfA l PP S ioa,'. m —I I I.1.3 i \r', .% ''' ',. \ ''1,, ' /,r • L J • • I 1 I I ' °o m n lop WA o O y- miw • v 'I BI �oA MEI I! 41 Fri) minion m; Zn; m; Np >z A906� I 1 - 0510010a.0W0 IC(0)28 tt ,ice_{ NOTES' ao i I 1_ 11152 w i _ w C F { w 1,FOR SURVEY CONTROL I INFORMATION,SEE st - •••\.,'I ti'W •:;;'_{__{t DRAWING C4. 9 / -�" '� ,, ,:;- 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING y L _ �tl SEE EDRAW DRS AND AWINGS SYMBOLS, )1.60 `` ;ll '// 'f / \ • A. • / J - STORM LOUC710N;�. ••I,• 4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE i O c0 l• \ ♦f -,'_ �?, '.� TRENCH SECTION, 3 ii-W< Q CV /Y/ �1 e- 1v -- • SEE DRAWING_ Z Z O '':-_'. ,'-:•.v--. / ty ,•.:,•i :.1 ...� 5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE QOC Z w f.7 !'•-- ':;:-..- 6 t., _ Tr.P ',, ,t -,, _ DRAWINGS SEE g, i BUILDING 25-20 L 3 O Nj. i•. i/t. 1 - ',-P 1 - FOLLOWING APPROVAL 5 AND ACCEPTANCE OF e a Li 2,v WET}AND-'5Z ,i PROPOSED STORM DRA N- 6 �'Z U BOUNDARY ... ^ •. ,A•+ a CONS u N - L•'� AGE SYSTEM BY OWNER, 6 rCi,ai 1i •, / j• rzNc cn FILL EXISTING STORM GRAIN U y - •i, FULL WITH COF, m� N •� ,t' ""i ;, REMOVE EXISTING / OQ t � 1 MANHOLE B i ' O Y a , - _Y.y _ //11% WETLA D^"{I"n � x .. _ _ ION -' -^•f`y P CA iC POSi(LP) "'- I C i 1 fYrSiRUC! ENCE I v, - _•- :. CLEM-AND-GRUB �:.��:::.. .-_. - :1•i r � ,+{:.l:.J'::..I.i�.:.:.J.:I.i.;'..i.i.•.:.�..I.i..�..:.i:.:.:..:.1.�. .~.::.:.:..:.:.i..:.:.7.I. 4 �J -.- -'DITCH.PLACE CEOTEXTI6G+•r+::K '.`.':— _. ............ ram`�""% :i' n RucnoN ^^ -- FABRIrQ , ^ :::_c'- RAZED- - • .JNS[ALI:�� i \ li \ 6 dI -�^ -...-...- ...�rr: .- .x....::.x••^` RN i6.51 -~. �.. :TRAILER I I.l a "" - ._:> LER jy_riia iiiniii/Alinriiifitiiiiiiiiaaiiiiiiiiniinnii/ifii, f ,I • ii '! i' _ _EARN}," .NR AREA 11 TRAILER .1 } 4 :< . 1 ON - = AREA UNDER , ,,, e_.,.*a , D rnui:n r i / I,1 , : w : - 1141E11141- : • 20' 10'' 0 =20' 00' Ammo 5 V S a/L-YCil,4 R. _TI�Y� E . 55 ry l 1/1 91 S La.!IL Ill .4 mi, 6 sa i — — 1 PERMIT SET 1 KEY PLAN 1 i L OAIE 07.27.88 J p C5100105.Ow0 IC(D)29 N s ; I I I , t °g-;<. i b S1 ! NOTES' fo I t '1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL �� lc:_' 5 :?j '1�_i - •1 • 7 i I -�"f 't ` I INFORMATION,SEE m w : " w I.IDRAWING G4 f 1 t •.;•} i i 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING U I....I"i....".."."_.. i \• I + 6.— NOTES AND SYMBOLS, j 1 : ' I , •:, i I 1 { •,; ,-I..- 7 1 A D DRAWINGS G3 Q° I �., i' '• 1 m.. I • 1• 1 i •t.i : !• h I SEE G4. R a s N 71,800 '\ ! >• I I et i 1 N•71,en 3S y w� + •',•. �-. 1 1 I CITY OFI RENTON 1 {I :'t I 3.FOR STORM DRAINAGE C> �..."—_-.--�- '•!i. 000 1 .'1 NOTES,SEE DRAWING_ Ili w , {.; I •:-;: i RIGHT F WAY I ^�I-- ff Q 'gi° LI - -- 1:i.i.j.}..5. r� I.:;.;.:. i.:.l..: i I :d w �,1� } ;::1 1 I ^ I i 4,FOR STORM DRAINAGE :_l_... �.:::'-J•-:J__; _.`.,v_�. ,I:_ ::.I' 1L'I 4 1 TRENCH SECTION, .i C7N .:. - w + _ � 1 � I:_I � ` •',i SEE DRAWING_ §12 I o ) .I 1 5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE L7 U �i i ,11i '• 1 PROFILES,SEE z w — _ 1 ,I 1 1 1 tl !j DRAWINGS_ °~ _, /' — W I t-4 i FOLLOWING APPROVAL m. �¢ BUILDING 25-20 ' i y ^r^P 'i o..% 6 F 0}' OF .., - '� 9:''1 f i 1 AND ACCEPTANCE OF -a I 1 S`U zw N i......•.•.•••. :'III I 1 I 1 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN- . ........ STORM DRAIN 1 AGE SYSTEM BY OWNER, a w r' I i' �I. FULL WITH CDT. Fli :: S> rn :f: s . D - 1 . I � � I a • I ' '. FILL EXISTING 1 •I gWS I 5 i j1 I:;-A I`_H I {SSw j iF �0E _ r '�' ) t I F E. I! . Ez ;li'1`' I ii+ u. U x • : :- :i.t i 1 1 'I. I 1 f I g mE "}• • .'u. 3jfr ; •,F'^ I I'1JII I p 1-.1 ".. fie co, O .: •.:C..::r—t ::li: . :] ....r......... .................... •3'. III•(jr)' c> aril I,. o s r :. ;. i :; • tl r ..................... • ........':i- '`. • it ---- .. t i--- _- - ------i vII'1. isI _ -- ; " , t • + - . . al 0, .11 C I. I ;; ..,—_ ....,.L.k.,.•.._..._•..•...•....•.•.........•...w.......1......:!-1..1 i...lt I I;,is::••:::7:. :Ci:.�:•`:.1..::`P%i_. :, �u;; .. ! `, :I I � ._.. I :. '. .. -'li_''".^__:-____:->i;.:_r:x-rrr.- • Itz"w II: , '=-"'c:. 1j I F//////f////////i/%///ifT/TL117!1Tttili t!/.�/PI//f /////////// ////////!/H1/f/f/H////f///f/////t%////f///1////////-//f////// H///t,) ' I i' I I 1 �__^ .: 1: tII I :i I / i• • WW • i y :. ;;j 5 ::•_,I 7 i i '.:ail i 1 i 1I ifiwiT 10 1 • • • is i 'I�...J. I'1 i i ,+: 1 le e3� zs I, • • • i m .I, i I�:I h • Li • , L., :li-i 51" L... I '.y; .. II I . ..I I L. 20• 10' 0 20' 40' 5 44 I= ._'3 S 55 ii/2.5M29L2LLL11 V. 5• 60 PI N PI lI/$51L T[ I 6 2!.k t` '!1 .1 :: 6 70 7 71 73 7 75 i r PERMIT SET , KEY PLAN SUM OK 1 z L MC.07.27.98 J • 32 M IL it i:: I ! ,�, / / / / / / / / / // ?�C/ / / / : / NOTES'tootoa.owe cL) o .� I: .f... -...._ _ I � ..... _ '•�• J•fY•/�x / 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL 11 1151 9 I I I;. It 0 / / / /% 7///'% / / / INFORMATION.SEE I ' L ` _:r'+ ./.. ...//. -/- -/.,C ?/...:/ /l / / rill DRAWING G4. i // l / / / / / / I / .y /1 m I 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING B Y w .II 7 i. /• m !.N°,�e // / / / / I!?r` /ii NOTES AND SYMBOLS. ,` V1 / 'a _ SEE DRAWINGS G3 04) T. I;;/ / // / //,'// ` • ... i/ r % ,�. i- AND ca. - a o_ j • I • / / / / / / / 3.FOR STORM DRA NAGE ::::. w0 5 i�wI I_ I % i NOTES,SEE DRAWING IUZ a I 1 r '' '!/ / / / / / / - ` '/' /,Il Y., ,•��' i` 4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE 9 j �w I: iJ 1 . ` i. w i + smucnom / >t Ow W � /✓T// /'`✓ %/.. i:, r I TRENCH SECTION, ��i w Z h f • / / / .l:S:t / /' ��1`4 / /r Ir I,l l .:I` 'u+cc �' SEE DRAWING_ - -¢¢ O ` + / /.�.�/ / / / •?I, 1'1 r'-5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE �U� K ;? :, (^ �-� / PROFILES.SEE a DO I 11 1` / : / / // I.%/ / 44 /+!/., ; ? •11:%r /\ = ' DRAwWNCS_ it 0 Q z La K I / / // /SX/ 04ti1 11p j::'•: :`• '•.rt �..�'�_ J 4 EXISTING POND'B" L 3 O N 2R.1661: M I , I . .'4 I/ •/ ,, i•'`` ^._ '.;C•.i!.,2_.©OUTFALL SHALL NOT F I U Z w N II I / ,( J // // -v• / it '1 'o.I: s - _ BE REMOVED UNTIL �, w _ / / / / / / / / ,/ _ ? a ilI( •` _ _...... -4 —_ _UNE IS CONSTRUCTED 7-p Q I � ( it I.�,\l ' AND APPROVED BY THE L.ID r„ ( V / A / / / / / j!' v /;' It '�`-,: ` _____________-:;.. OWNER.OED TO SMALL 1 O U I I 's, 1 I B 'I I I _ BE REMOVED TO E%ISTINC » V) I 1 ( /. / ��/ / // / ;:'. it _ _______ __ —_ MH. MH WALL SHALL BE () c PRyPOSED STOR ` �: 1 --'-"" SEALED WATERTIGHT • .1 OR,}INACE COMB E. •:° / /• / / i'• I,+Ik,I ! _ _ I .._. • ! W LAND/OFTEN ON PI N ,: `1 I ] i ' ,'• • r II ! I I a• ,J•^____............. :l ! w CONCRETE. g I =..1.,(:'� DESIGN SURFAC E-65 1 / / / / /: ',+ - �.,• FOLLOWING APPROVAL 1L / / / / ¢(w)=sou �•) '�•;,#fA AND ACCEPTANCE OF Cs. Si • :Ij , I I I .it ^. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN- 0'� �'E I I /-( /-/ / ,' �' i - II: j I / AGE SYSTEM BY OWNER, O I '/ I r: 'I7 RIP-RAP�r .•: REMOVE 1B'DIP AND FILL F Y I // // / f'i 'I 1• •: I1, , 'I I. POND'B', 3 E-W " it c 1 I s// f: / / ! i i r/• _'I••I I I; Uae` j 1 z I ''/_ ? //%.../ r I i/�•i' I, ill ggle ; ' m / / : T // f i ill;` i. ' ! I f •t - 1, /J 1 / II // lit( ! �: ; I • STORM DRAINAGE COMBINEDI • q yl nS i• : j i' I I' I WEVOND/DETENTION PO•ND • • ^! 11 I f I ! ! / r // / I 1l: PNOPO.ED LAKE ,I. I• I wnrCra EI.=6s11. h ,Z 1 1 - 1 / // / ARA110 /RECIRCULADO I II:4>nu.]/e/ve g a I .�i srsTE '1 ! I • / // • •1 � u 1. t. _e�L� 1 1 ` / /� 1.1 /II/ / 1 I t :, ! I '`It::iL—.__ we No..H.. I 1` :i, t t � - �1 ---- -- III- i ---- � I / -- - -- --i-•.._i_ •;t_• _--A - -BD Th4Y I-4-I 1.- -'- , t-I-i - • --- • `{ • I 4—II P' I '.{ 1,+.' • PLACE ED':GR B DITCH, I 1:• IE(S)=6.14: i ,� I' / / -is.�.. '6. \ QT,E%T FABRIC Itt t`1•� "�, I, g(Ia ep '• Il <�v>• / I r'7f N , 1 '4 AND INATW,G•E(TYP)D I • •t'•, I� i e I d 1 ! I `'l, I O O I t, I j HIP-RAP; :;''.•.�.ti t'\.. '1 /�/ b, ,� . I D.I. 1.{:;.:�i'•-:'IV• I I i! ,_,:::..:•:`may];% .r�F. • i n /,I/ I.,, SD HA. .••� ARYi I 3 NT •t k, + ' ) �1 :a. 6"cdvirtiuc`nod_ ..• �`•" a-.cw .' i I '1 I / / .i IE OUT W ` vi .."........`. - i- - - - '1 -II - - - - -- I II \\\ il/ / E '1. 1 !1 -i- - - )S `_ __ .. . il I glll1 m 1' it 15 I{ I 1 1 i - '`.�• . •E OUT w)a n :B `b1. Ii / / / ,, stre•w— JI-:.- � l Iw. / N a 22 5 0 ) 'i'�I' .eTl +1 'e'1 / / a 60T.46 C0%li`-62B I i;` . ,,, .. 24=STOW D 1 ,�•" Ll.::"-,..... .�1:.. .: -,eS 39 Ir f 20' 10' 0 20' 40' 0 4 I Tm MY--. 41,i 50 ' 3 - 55 h S-1/4- 2YA- — 3] : 5I0 60 8 N 1E��1.MtC � 6 63 6I 65 j �L �) 5tl 64 70 2 ]] ] ]5 — — — — — -- -- -r -PERMIT SET 11 K�--P qN-- --- 1 - L ssr 07.27.98 J • C.S100109.DWC 1C(D).3.3 / I p ' ',k --'-:;-....1.N.IA.I.r..,;„,...... --...E.- 2,'.,-- - 1_ ••••:-., I:I NOTES / /) / ' 1 SUAR'T VIOEYN.CSOENE ROL / N' z"-- . . 1 . •i: • . : !i DRAWING G4. . 7 ,/,..." -;. \i i Rim=17.60 • • • .1 / •• •••• • 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING ,.." • , • , •. • ' :/ I i .:N. •,,.... .-- .--" .., . . .1 NOTES AND SYMBOLS, 0 ,.. • .: : SEE DRAWINGS G3 :, x, 1 •1 • AND G4. 2 / I :7- 1: i . ,i . wBOMUNDNADRY7/' .../ : . i : : 3.FOR STORM DRAINAGE / ': i ; . PARKING tor AREA I 1..),**, /I , t. Ni l ! i i • . • ; .. I i i • • • : •, •, • . ,-I ,• NOTES,SEE DRAWING_ ._..../ I if( r • . 4 ::5,, La i ... • ,.:,..P09,ER PANEL 1 / i I i : •• : ,- •.. •.. 5, : 4.FOR STORM°RAMAGE TRENCH SECRON, •••- 1 ) I .:. ! ' ' ...•-•• i '''I i •.,... •• SEE DRAWING_ ,... —X,<:: . , r:. • .' '• Ez< '.1 ....-..-----. \\ I : li \f ....--.".--'..- : I . ., /.7. . 5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE §ig ES g 2 ,/ ;,•-. . •, •••••, ,::::,-•••• I PROFILES,SEE oa CI 6_, : I. 1'ik ,,,..--, .Z ..'• DRAWINGS_ 66 I ; ...._,„ ••., I ,; . • '.•. 13 5jZ'C' g N 71.400 , •... ' 1 I . .. , •,,.. \ : N 71,400-6-> FOLLOWING APPROvAL i • •• :;i • + :•.' -. AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSED STORM DRAIN- rn + . 1 , : I ., •., .., ,t I. , ::: •, • •• AGE SYSTEM BY OWNER. ..:El 14 L,ti -.7.... • - ; fr 1 • ' FILL EXISTING STORM DRAIN 0< .., L m' ....- . i 1 \ . ‘ "" • ; :' ; . FULL WITH CDF. 1 a j S •-•.:::•------•::I 1 1 i • .1 - ....................... 'I • •-"--. , •••. : : •1 .. •s •• Falp,V0ELEXISTING Ma ...... ••-_---.1-;..,.'..1'... , i --.' I / •s. -..F.% . . .••• . ----"------,, ;1 i;1 1, , .. • 1 . • •:: : ram FOLLOWING APPROVAL i .- •,, \ : il:Ii: , -.I.2 ••;••.h:,•....,-,,:-ouor IRON r i ii...li I ,..,, I . • i 1 I • . i • •• ' .• • • . ' .-.. AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSED STORM DRAIN- 2 v./..iiiiv IE(E)-5.,5 I ;;1 . 1 C...Z .P•2 '''-',': i..ri .., 1 11 . • : • • • . ACE SYSTEM BY OWNER. 'I REMOVE 18'DIP AND FILL 0 0 41 :'''.f:'-2-'•i'4---Rtp-Rap KIP i 1•' • POND B. • : :: : .24 ' .'- .• . -, 1 • 1 :: ., ›'. :! i 1,.. , i .• ". 1 1 ! :, •i: • .5 •F.w e,o: ! ., .' • • :I\ r i 1:' 111 • ki . .C.2 IX 'Z;` i '•'11 III g i E '1,, Hri S'.: • t i,W 15 t; 1 ‘ I 1 \ • • .' i It .; ...•i i II :. , '4111 .A... • .• "•-.. : ; i 1 • i .,..0.......,....-. ..., , . • ii \-. POND .." •....._ ‘. :1 i i ipoxrk BOX VI/ i :-.;;.,.---:.:).--.,......----.-:,:;.Cliiril ;•:: I il il li IMO`' ; rrffam'.7--/:/:£1 r---....i•;:..t. ,, ;:i ., •...\ " i , ,.•,f r:_.....-jf-i,i2 4y i.,. -,. . . STORM ,,,,---,....:f., N/ • -, , ,,,,,, : / ) .. , i•. 1 •::. : :.: ., •,. • • •id 11 F,Zgt,,r '; rib' / j ,, •. :: ., . ,. op t RIAI-r.11.79 •• • -:.:, 4-W - 1 :IE 2,1"RCP(E)=9.24 ; ,:i i. -,-- ,. I. A I IC 0-PMC(,,)- ',....1 i ,i I j• i I',•'' : .--- I :11:1' i • • • 1 .. , • • .: i , N.,4.--.:,•:-..1,•••••:1 :,• : ., . 1 ,'t ..--- 1 : .1 • —...., I.....,:f., I 4.04,./iiii%i,• i 1 so,,,,, Ea : °I ! ; ; :; -----..•--' . • . • • : 1 . r• RIM,15.16 •13 1U 1 1 1 ------•• ; • i; If 24-RCP(E =6.77 ! ; 1 • •. -1 I . • : ,1 • '• :. ; -'•-:,.. ...-..-1. I. ii ± 1 ,, "-:.i.....\± 1 ••• \....---j / • • 1. s • : i • : : 't , , • • •. ,.,A. •• • fr ,---16 1 '• %, -- '',. - - ..„ _ - / i. •:•-. :;::;::i 1 k 1. I.:7, , . , 1 i .'..'...j • EDGE Of PAVEMENT 2,g f 2 .., -'-•"-.... • Mira. 1. o SURVEYED ON JUNE 1998 . .N, WW1 _ ,,. •RIM=16.1.•,, ...., 06\ ,,..2 , • .. ...._...., - . .,.. ..,..„ ' i :'ill EfArgra*' L... • .... i .1.RCP(19=9.06 ' -,.... .... .. •,••....,.... 4 ----'‘'.-•--- . ' --- —'- ••••••• — ----- ' I ' ''' • • • ...,..._..........„.,......... . _,E ........______ ........... ..,...........,. 8; 201 22_s2040 3 —..`—i• _' 50 55 65 1. N &M AC,24.4.23‘MAI '11 hi• Li LULL/2.M 21 Ca .).P . u 6. 70 6 71 = 7 75 21 ti i r PERMIT SET 1 KEY-PLAN ......,,,, i g L WM 07.27.88 J "d,u 014012\2200\C5100110.DWG "....[CL/7.1.9e ^°':`°' ",a..ae.v " au aPrm w. I I Prae '''."I ,�� BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �03.04.9e /� RENTON Y OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ® I „wd I EC' own,'aa/Bune"o/Public w"re Dept. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1C75)34 NO. REV6gN BY DM0 APPR .•� sir®• `� Gregg Z mean P.E.Administrator GRID 34 �' I , :•Ii N .I • 1 i 1 r i I• I I g 1 53,810 ?I E 5J,Boo I 1 I} I} • j .!. .. ..1 .+;I., ..1.. ::... f! ._ »...5 i «...,... It .:. j ...f� ..:! «.7:: 5 ..:!�:.•.�.:Ll::., � LN.. c,. .9 :»,:a::ar.: ::I:. :3c:a,a (aia::::.. ..:@:»::c��.�S:c �:.r.. .d.:•�� 2°PW a, ;I/ ,= I • . • k }.,- 1 i �3, I i t =.,,. _L c . p. • • 54,000 :� :j E`A.009 u.- 1 r ,. ' li ......:.>ate.....-.w........... .._,:_. 'e'" ._ `•� THE-BOEING-COMPAlK �a 17 ....""'e :::::::................-----••'.....:.:7-'24.=-----'15:', .,.....r___ _ _____ _....,..._...._____ ,_ 1 A? n ' 00 1 ....._ V., .... i3 OAKSGALE AVE.S.W.(BY OTHERS? 7 METRO SS... SS— .: N —.i: ..__ I THE BOEING COMPANY 0 —•r- 10B"METRO SS...__— ........_.-_...-............ C SS _— •i i Ri i i [ [ m i�1—[ [ [ _ ::.........—_6 v . o4-m o. . _ .<, -_ — .�.. — .......... N — ---- .... _..._ I - ,.•.. °.•" ".' � � ...`S:l �\ EI El pit • • _ !I t i- ,S� yam. : \ ��:i`t. tt 114 Is : ova mAAm IA oZ o- » ., ng. i nP. 000 ipz ;J cnc Rs F nq § �R N � mN Ii; fN0o mi r r �PFm 10 . = I I '411'0140I 2\2200\C5100111.DWG ®' ""'°"`KCL/6.26.9B^°'"" mw^'m'� '"• e a*el m'4. 1 ®Yiir+rup 4e.r°00. awr".c c u) w-mm ® pram �'�SNOWN �'��"' a CITY OF BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �'W.04.99 — .•/1` tIK RENTON SURFACE WATER MANAGMENT PROJECT r STORM DRAINAGE PLAN.— � ""h mBWlElna^P" �,oeP1. 1C(D)35 NO. REVISION BY DAZE APPR ..ems `., Gregg mean Pt,M`000strobr GRID 35 // n l � :1 III I' I 1 I N : ;1 i /i:•: : ;r: 1: 4, . ! i ` _... __..... 0. � t a , :S E 54.400 tI :I 1 . 4 Dy itr/ Et'(.4CQ, I♦ I i ♦♦ _-- � is f e/i ! i i •..:::" I/7'' // _: t - -_._:c t it (!Y Ir l . r, :f. e:_i m .moo by ooio\;....._. I '•' a` m / z • /, f.� I ...._.. i i ...;.,,__.... sus •if : ..::. - — — BOHN }�./ f t„� ,: \ — — �...C�'COAIPANY.:.:_1e_ 1.I• I '/ i - - •_- � I Ems'^' J^ • / mN r CZ 9� ._.: • I 5 Wiz-- f , j ;I,. � s pl I t N :'4 - vI �a MR0 —.....__ �� MR 1 i 'EP I•• 10 V 3I A r ` LJ E 5..500 0 o E 55,9E • Z - — ° �_ tono mp A gmm mz O"I,-.•, -- ^ zgPDio I'll oynFV m1 _ ir L y '�� ��,I� -\ 4411 V JI ; RN! m! NN 2, lM ' i a f m =:N o CO m .m o 1 ..w..0 01 02\2200\C5100113.DWG m ^ww^'KCl/9.76.9R^°'v'^' .wa w.w.o .a ...'o'^'.em m a I Sverdrup " „c.e "i S OwN �e A BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �oo.01.9a __®® CITY OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ds\ RENTON ® r.n9; m&ge /PEc Works�Det. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 70)37 NO. REVISION BY WI APPR -•m �' /j�'/ GRID 37 — [ ice[ i��1 [— tl It 1 //"''` V., 9t y .- I 1, _.. Ss., 4t' !-, i i •I 1 �1 \4 1 r 9�' 't gam' - _ j 4\ tlY'" •14 ., t1 tt 1• c'r` !i t4051 9 / , '\ \ \ 4s<,' . ,--::::-.-:„' './///// '.''''\ liti;.X4e°141 .*4i•---- ..C"‘.. ..._7, .,.., , 1 .,.,a „,. . 9•00./., , ..,,..,, Orior"." ..:,, , *.iifr ,i Ow" , r ,• ,••a/ r `'mp. at/ E rrrrrA, rr ' � fi rrrrrrrrr rr r /ill ' � 8 rr nV I . ,:.(r c;3',, „..-I ( „ 1 z 000/ -I . r`?, ".'-'"- ..-------- 1 •• 4 FI J.';t 1 I —Z—� t ! 1 1 tt rNL 1 . r• om ri p b 31 pt* !i Nli . : PO r LJfi ..o- ' . ... PZD' o mu N V .�t - V \ Zn m gM 'oz. O p mI ilQv „ 4\ • W gwno5 41 �p ' ?Z s _ ry iW TX OA r,p , 8 8 v o U �m c n 0n wmF. ailis 1-1-..-I :-''•"' • C5100114.0w4 tC(0)35 .., ..... \ : ,--:.7.1•--Ir.f:3 : *---**---:. ::',Ir•:-3 NOTES 6,o It ----......... . .... , --, , .... ,, : : .: ,..: *: 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL A li 1 Jc.-2 11 INFORMATION,SEE ••-.....-_, _---•... DRAWING 04. • 3 : • 3 :.I. 1 *,-,, fr.r..,-,A 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING r.., \ i (......:19——.7.:„.,y; L' .jj NOTES AND SYMBOLS, SEE DRAWINGS G3 , I ' • -ITI1- •(50 0.01 --I,•,. '..... AND 04. ce 8 •-....,... -•••••;, , •:]..i . ..., .:; • - 4,.--,:. k " .-.--, ... : • ••• .,---,., 3.FOR STORM DRAINAGE :. :-*1 NOTES,SEE DRAWING_ I- 5 . • . , 0 z ••••• .. : • .'...-1 " 4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE ° ilitt , ---„, --,4 ...., • . •• ". : TRENCH SECTION, ".... .'r't i Q •. :•-•.---, SEE DRAWING_ .----. -"--- .._, ......,... 1 I .i'..--.1 ---1 . • 5.FOR STORM DRAINAGE ::,-'51. § L7ESi LKG f ' 1 I MSC liYi :',1.':: • • PROFILES,SEE < c,,..., --'--... .. , : LIGHT PO, .. .... DRAWINGS_ 0 X ••-....,....., .....„.... .........., _......._ g S3'.. ce -:-•-•• . . ....,, 4 - N. ; Q:,.; '--1 ,...;, ':i '..• ' .,,,,„4, :!., ,,--.-,-I a o I.', :.... . ...,.._.::.1 00 .. .• .• .. 1 1 1:•.:1) C : '...---..,-..i • : ! 7:ELI ---..... •---•• . ,..,-",,,, • PO 0 \ rovcc ; 3 --N ' 1 . '-'--1 ..: •5 ..,.......... , ---. , 2 ,5 OZ. ' • -•-•-_, '..., „..,....,, I i ,t• ; • ... C ... ETLAND'TY' ...„ , '. • i. . • ,,-.—— ^ • •• • • ', .st i 24 0 0 15 E E-. " '.'..... ..... •• NDARY \tz„. \ 1 • • , ' . • .. . , . ' ' • ':i: IRRIGATION CONMOL VAL Vr "•••, ,, . $ . c...)= -Z.-' s.,.. .• 1). 1 • . . . .. .g a --.. -'3:-...,.\ •.% .., \ '• 4 I -- ..---" ..',----'"----5--.; --.------..........."--"'"5.4., --v:.--- =. .. c•U '-.,.; ---, •-, \%. . /I :. .•:*: .. • , . ' s ••,. / • ..;:s..'...2-.J .3;,,, ..2.s'....7f:E ,..-..-; `...:...",:../ ,..:::, .....} .....,......... .... .... --.1---------- -,-&... -.., • -• - ...--- --,..„,i..4 ...... ; qig \ i •NvEmEna - .„ .... . ...__....____-, -- . ............---, ,... .....--- . - . .; . .. ...._. .,......— , . :. ' \__ 0: • 6 3 411 \ `.. •••••••-.... • 4 ..I , ::*•••\ , i Di i ,,,, , . . ••, : • .. -,•• •••• ''',., ti.CONS'HUGO.I ... ..5 . \ . "I, , CLEAR AND "5Itt. \ \ i t , . , • • . . FENCE : GRUB DITCH, "•-..... • • •i • • . PLACE GEOTEXTILE -•••••.. /i / • r • 1 I •1I ,. ,.. 1 \ 1 fIi• FABRIC AND , •••...,. *`... INSTALL GRAVEL ,.., i i I I, ! A' ..„. AND PERFORATED :••• / : ! I ' t.64 [ , 1 L' PIPE(TAP) ! .1\ 'f 1 /•I / ,.., •.,f.:: I . • ,/., ,•,...4N rt? .' 4 i - 11,-7-k- filE1 i ••,. WETLAND 7**,4 i • .. 1 : ......-,etz..4t m . "..,. "..., ,,..,.. • / lii Ihra-C ' i . i.•-• i •-•,,,...,. ...- i • , ,,, i 1411E1 6,14..,,... ...-..-;•"' •••• e Erin,ral, I•--- .• ; .0 7 ; \I X \ ‘. X".X N ...-'. ..-)'''' I I / X X , • . , Erf_.61141 r ..../ ... ! \ .,.. \ „,..... ..:. ..., .. . , , • , • UM IIIII '"MI 4121 6 20:.411Z—4,9 m0 LIMEIRMEI LEMIalLiiES KLAPUBlie _ v-3 s IA SCL24,1-271,41L, N iiimauxicu PE=:in a „ i r PERMIT—SET- I —KEY-PLAN- ...46. _ ..L ovu 07.27.913 J 1 g F.,...014002\2200\C5100115.DWG 7 ---KCL/7.1.98 1O1''°' '•''°'^...'. m ........... ...4 .aj kv-°mw..«r CIVIL. INC. ( ." was 1""' slam,. .`"T.T" Erat CITY OF BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK "°o.7.wse STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT _ /\ RENTON __ — F=� ® Piami^9�B�lei P"nc�Wo.e Defy. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1C(0)39 NO. REYISK/N BY DALE APPR .... �'�•�•• ,: D^'99' '° P.E..Aam�i,Lroyo, GRID 39 .m w 0 I•. : • • �I I # .. .. • . v m y •. i..l I I I k . ' 1 '. 1 I y 'E 51800 —— ii --- I •—"- E 53,R00 Al : . 0 a I' o -t y: z N �:. '« . s, r PW ,mAS1HALT £ — A• n mIil mot.__... ., Y.( --...._.... yJ __..... . W_ — z•Wr....................CW-- _ 10 t iM1l • I 1� l ? ;t L• I i ` II i m q. i \• E Sa,OCO lI/ 1 I i} E 54,0C.: ti • �.:.—.I — - . .� iME-- �{`` -——.... ... ........... an Ob OAK50ALE AVE.S.W.(BY OTHERS) .. 'z 1 • n I Eo i t THE" SING COMPANY' _- _ X X X X X i _—X Ti ..1 A N -- 1 ... -- _ _ .. z m —I rP r ' — o�o�io o Il O o _ .N...... LJ :, _✓.11 l y _. _ EN m0o Aii RUA so 0 VI,_. _z. �..\ 9b O A m 49 p s .1 ' v. 99II„ a s lull _L E E. A N zy; X: AFo ?i 8 E.L�ura o t :c:�r•_: 3 - ng "off � n ^^^.014002\2200\C51OO11 fi.DWC �`o....am CITY OF GOING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK o�.w.se orw�c �' SHPNN 7' SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT _ RENTON _ I Pbnnina B I�n��Pu61b w rEa xot. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1C(D)40 N0. REVISNIN Br DATE MPR ^® •`� Cregq T arm P.E,Idminiatrotor GRID 40 'm - / i o i.1 a` j • ff' • —• q: I /• fr / • iI. ii • . , \ y •—_...._... .• E•54 400 ." -/ _ ---- --gam-- ___. O 6 a -(---,t �i --...._......_..�-..�... :::-_.�....�- THE BOEING COMPANY `'' I E�gfioo' I 'It `1 1 i I , 1 I i , r I I i :—z--/ 1 t r 1' V N 11 F. m m. 1111 .`' 11 1 tZA E 5449C0 o E 54,900 if . -.0\ - m zFnfro i ' � c Vm R�p N $ � N £ 4„rF��t� if $l � y C5100120.0w0 ,C(D)..1 a a s .'' NOTES • CLEAR AND':i 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL INFORMAGRUB•DITCH,': I •'l Il •f• \ ''';;y PLACE FABR C 5ND LE BiO.` DRAWINGTIG4. SEE d ; A - • --'\ / I i + \RT1,D PERFORATED•. _ ;.-2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING --1 I r F REt{(ONI NOTES AND SYMBOLS, ~ OF-W w 68�..'4:; '\ .. RIGFA ___= DRAWINGS G3 x .I CITY 0 6` 1. 14. � AND GRAWI A _..."_• -...._... 8.a -- 1 �� I. _......... _=.... 1 1 I l 1 �I \ 3.FOR STORM DRAINAGE _ r W . j j"'16"" ' NOTES,SEE DRAWING_ �z — — EEgg \a \ 88,�w I WETLAND '1' 4.FOR STORM DRAINAGE O ,I�: I• `�'1. BOUNDARY- TRENCH SECTION, A N Q aa CI b• ., , r FORSEE DRAWING_ Z I U 6 gt2d. I: I • •\ 5.PROFSLES,SEE TORM DRAINAGE U' ECG -+- " ,-.......- Iv._.r •^ DRAWINGS_ A L J¢ O I �o ' F 2•U z3 N _ ....! : ;'7'-. .i...: -- -' -.._...1 r \y t t �'2w� I - +—o. -- 1 3 1 N • \ti `. WATER•.- 1 ® ', VAULT U, I i w , • —C:... ... w w , >"w t I l a ... . . . .., 5. E", a .___..,.�.. VEIGETATION AREA-.. '--' �� i VEGETATION AREA I I U�' c€ VEGETATION AREA I (; '! ,'t ^ ,KING COUNT`(T ^ .'_, l I $E11(ER EASEMEN 2 \E 69 'f. 1 v °.� N 70.600 i I i\. ...—. _- 1,. 7..68tr" r —IL I •:J7 1.17;., e ill ZRF _ YYYa " I 1-1/2"W ` 'Ij CB TYPE I ,t1 ....� / �u :, I TOP = , 58 : I ' . ?`I yi ,�. :r INV T NE. O _ _'1.� RCP pU -- —__M 3.58 72" SW.' 3.M1n 12" + y -::- e� . ,_._._.�? :` _ :'• CB TYPE`{_ •• MP PNY CO p�,� 17. I 1 eEp aa ! I 1} ,,MH , = 1M1 tl5 b P C S. \t�6 ,.W:`'1 MH f\•. INV= 1 .77 M1 YC N. OEtNG COG I' g "t-__ I- '.MH Ir -i11NV \ , N1 I1 .._ CBS. �-• ' ry CB'TYPE .... CLPTN822 ___ t \tlI �';t - ��y�`.�, ,f is `— • 6"SD....._, P+ / SET NAIL i / 0 TOP = 15.70 ` 17 .;1 - INV = 13.88 "RCP IN`8. �L 70466�2767 ASPHALT 1 I tl I 31� a] _5/ ) �. SP�'m-E NE INV = 13 6fiy_PVC IN si ''3]— .. — '-- / t .; - _ �..PVPEV...If 3> 85 12"RCP OU,d NE E 53967.7�53U N �� ryT, sii,FM �l --- �w• E: 1I • , d _ 0 20' 10' 20' 40' —IIIpi.... , -5 O 4 �af f so o ,E 55 5. N IL ,y 20 D i _rvO r 7 72 7] 7 75 — — - -1 PERMIT SET—, KEY PLAN._ : L w,e 07.27.88J - - n4..e,01 02\2200\C5100121.DWC (per' .4 o ro..00 m r !rYl+lY' e.+.. .u` j'.u-e000- • nNae �"'� a•��,�, BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �"03.04.08 ® CITY OF STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT /\ RENTON i` e®• I�.—.1I '�' Plennt /N OIn2 PeMm were Dept. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 1C(D)45 NO. REVISION BY 1 DATE APPR p.W� .� Gregq ZI merm P.E.,Mminietrclor if l GRID 45 'm -'—'— t-.1.—, .`11\' ,'r\i "' I. I I a /' } i,I i ./ F 06, r' t •,�•11 ,.. 1 '` i s t I r t o I:1, ` j J tt I ,f•tr• {7 I Ii�. ._•.L, i icy i. I . 1 /II m1 •;i, I, : : i ii 1 ' i f i vbsv oiO IY y,I 1 t . l! 1 . • r' 11' t'.k w II 1 1 'I i I ,I F, L q 11 , i h 1 '1 \1'\`�: 1 1 .1 .S l '' \,1 9 ,\d\\\ 1 i t 1 r \-' l 't r., II r\ t t1 1 '\,l 1 \ i '\ t i \ tt l �,, 1 •t�'. 1, % \ '\\ It t ..\ o <•�`, r5t\. ' \ \ c'\ i 11 \� '•` rt': '\\ E sn,4oa tt1 t:.\,.i\ 'i } \ �c-'\ \ '\'� \\ E sn,400‘ - '1\'; '\•\'\ •,4 ;\ \`\ S'N \ ` •.,t, •\ ,, •\ 1„\\`,'\\1,\',`'\\ \\ \\ N '`�\ ` \ t. \`,\`\ \I ,\ ,• `` `} •1 \l, •I \ `t \\.. ;s. ' 7 i I ` 1 L E 54,E00 r•' ,� '^ : E 54,600 ( • .., J. .II I III'. :) j L. i I I" —z—� r1 r .1 I 7iA.; i B 73I I L. , o I •it* i 14 -11 } mmI ;` -1) uo i L.J i. LLI E 54,500 \ o E 54,500 �= -_I • -�� $aq EN oA gmoz �'Z'z O �' I711- I �o EN m So y I f N n 1:3iLO gov~�'ir' ZpN (2 m y .li `rl( INmo Ana No a�zi � � N �+ 4(am+.�. ys Z ; m; ;9 ?z� R. , A ; _lia �II m Ioi; FEo �� m$ mz m §A if m� o n i o IUOUOU ,, . N�o }g li 11II 1151000]6.UW0 9L ,w 6 r { ,'l. ;•: .: ... (. I 1 1;.1.�E.•,19,,,,1,, ::P� ,:.. _ _ ..•,`:.: NOTES' s TO SVI� 1 th`I „ :T._ :. • :c^......................... , 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL 1 5 ;r. :'<:• •'Ijf-:�• —��I:��-:y`:. •• INFORMATION,SEE 7 .E ].\ .........c...;...—:.-:. ..-.._-.. _.-...: ______--__•___ -I .�}..,`-: _▪ 3 DRAWING G4. 1 1 • , L , :: ................... 2 .:: :.;:.: . • U - - ,.r ...� .I: - 4','•'•:?: 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING ,J I. I-;., ;Air' t.'$i�::;:,`.{._-.. `•` -` NOTES AND SYMBOLS, O ' i'i :'l';..:'j<<'-' \,,\:A-•. -.--- ``�:;\:<:-'.!: : ;,i ijijl--.':-:r°:: i'. SEE DRAWINGS G3 as ijfj: ..;1.: .. : I�r ::�•h;., _ �y - �yf _- AND C4. : 25 0 M•'+\ 1 ':t"'ii���":'' 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOUTION Z fA _ �ti. AND TEMPORARYNTER OSION/I - .i.'.�•� g W f)1 P -w i IM AT1 N CONTROL w3�` i` :t. SED ENT 0 0 L �'•"ti: N SEEDRAWING s,.,P t NOTES, ,11v t', O w �ct�`f l l:; .I.. .� I cD .Zf 1 if� I i, 1 - .. a:f 'L '• :.f 9001. j^w Z ..-w 1 1 EXIDI Y t• . „�3 n �,.._ ,L__._...keV:i:•,}., . ,. t v ; i:•' v ? ¢ p :...h: :{ ,. i :: ':l. ;..1 .. ..--- .._.�. t ': `..:..':"'.-av-. .. - •:,-#:''I ."\\':�:; CONTRACTOR STAGING, Y d,- -W t., - U 1 j { N r ! ,1.. ••'':;\•' �'•�:::xyy;:;;i:_:yiv., LAYDOWN AND STORAGE '�Y, • cstci POD ,' ..'4, — .'•.:... .\ _ _ :v td. ). .. � .I ... ,.., ^s: _..- •nF:.,_-.�>t,t •• ',.,,•�.;;::,:,t_.._,�_ tea*::=_�.-':_�, AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL O t. •! .i �F. ���.f�•,,.•<t:+r .,IS .•,., �).>:,``I�•.,..` � PREVENT TRANSPORT OF z w .I .I :I NP.d .r. 9.,�... :i;;,.. O t . :: '=`-i :' : ,` SEDIMENT TO E IN S l • fv.:r;::<va"fr1 SED E EXISTING G L '•.i` ::' 'ii' ?1 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN 7' O t It - : _ _ _ •••� :I P LD ,r<�;•- e - ACCORDANCE WITH SP IF- w i I L Z ::Ii'++` ''1`' CATION 7.PRO02 10. : --t. -_U SED -iy : w :ry.t �. :•>CS POND � •;;.,. ::::: m I . .I.. ...#.�- .. . ....... . ::; : :.:.: .• ; ..fj$ CTION HAUL p ':•..-';:• ' 't'i':;i'`•• 5 CONSTRUCTION I �- O '\' ra?if+',-Yi"' _ •^ I �r:. ROUTES NOT SHOWN. i EN• 6EME T- 1 a ,:: t - CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT ,.:sue'. EVEN i -ram•.•.;..'.: `v, F T TRANSPORT0 SEDIMENT .1 �: AND DEBRIS BEYOND PROJECT • ':n^. r' CI 5 .F,: UNITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1: I %Y .t'iF Yj n 71 _ 1 o :•,:;i „'C';.,•, .: • ,. •..- .::'.'.c..:+.F. .. �.. 2ia?•, ."\a`•: - SPECIFICATION 02 0. 8P ,_ it •. .,-:_.__.;..�..:' P._./.•af�.::n. iT' - ... ... - z �E 21 T u jy ,...,r,.a _ -'jam I- Z -J ':Y :• r. f# ..-.::y':P`+:' ,.,: -„ - i r,_&.-I j;i zi i;',t,:� - r• B - -- I t a� 1 r ':j� tpQ W g I' ['•ir 1, xF.:f: .1 +,:-� is �_, I , 91�:. sY.'f •25 20 i�!...f:•_::.::1 �; �: -�5 0. 71 ill S :1: :fit :%�:. >� /� '?���;�'•�'•• •, 3 •'t,�tt 1'`t;�"� •l 1 ='e ,,,„ n ill '' :. ..:> d ,EN, DN: I _ `�'rz - - ��.` ,I }y. .i. ,l t $ 'i f _ - i , i 26 I - INI -. E -�:.wow. 1.'1 Ir: iiI a is ..v � � ;., 1. ..:: r O 9 QQ i7Sltal:l� - ,i�f :k: .,1.F-''-' 'I •r v, � .,- --- —• - t, - —- ' :'�i,`- •— - - -- .t, �( .:�: I :tip.�`:>;.. �-- — .I j�i: ?i } • e I I- m 1 1: %6�4 �� ti i� 'li` t`.' 'a —ii f. :r;•, t {i - �i� .J �r I� r .� `i i :r (,y ':1 �▪.I Ir• r /'- 11 / f/i r 1 i �$I '1� Y II 1 � ji �C 4 J(": . I / l "1� / : - 'i V11t1" p o ;ti r� .. � 41 � :'t I - J I •/I;,r F: 4 ..fin I:�11'� 11. - 'il r i. •C i� •ft I �i r:f • 1 1 ::e / � � r r l f • - - r r a! @ t; '.s.:f ro5• o.:. : :.::f. ' - 4 .-___---_--_ ii%/.�1.L/flit/at,,i .ii _ .•eF:,t .:,,,;1,.. -:\, -., VII i i'+ _ rit„::m:i4i! I' __ `/rt fqs`:. i, tit -' .f III, 315 : i':� I'i�5 biro. ? I .. l L ; f�i - 1 t 111 1' _— . • ` a , ' •0 ! 1Mj j` 1•-' isw ._ . , `'t, : ::- _J ,,f. i `! ;: 3 - a 'l `;1.1•'•-.-—r r. IS KEY P f ,1t -'",,•,'• ;f;f, ;:r. 1 ,n 1 it 'l' _ LAN :f �E 1y E _ — 1 'll il. {i'" f __ '�1 I: r: ;:i: i t IA It t M t IL VI E ;N ,.!n: It' :1n�•;'t'- `i:`:'1l- -_ =( ... ....m _ ` 1 PERMIT Il e; i• o I t h ','�\} \\ .-'I---I - -- _ 1 DATE 07 27 AR p o t i \ ,: ,• ice. s-i,- _ �I - -._._......-. a 4 � ::: SET {{ttt ,/] 2 -- -frill?1 --I�\ ''` •-- —- - - - _ —_ 100'S0' 0 100' zoo' O J 05100007.080 9L12 I o ,N c t „1 �; . €: NOTES: i I'� `I 1 ��- W ; 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL •j t . , - - I 1 -, INFORMATION,SEE • F€ _ f( DRAWING G4. A F '`�1 1; I,•` F f:A 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING SEE D 'I I .1 1 I NOTES AND SYMBOLS, I I ci i 4 - f;., a SEE DRAWINGS G3 • U a a. I I J 1 .!� ( 3.FOR GENERAL MOUTION AND TEMPORARYEEROSION! a i WSg w U ;Ti ,I F SOAR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL a �8 A. L.Nj N 'I + l 1., 1 SR 7.59 NIV= 110.64 NOTES. SEE DRAWING U H I / $# ¢Z 41413 1 • ; i f - INV= 9.34 j+`I"`5., AE%ISTING STORM ORAIN- +A < 1 18"E ® GE SYSTEMS TO BE 4 Z 1 ! j w INV= 9.24 PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN $ p, G f .... »» .__.».,-..»...... .�8p ._......•V:6I ExISTING LAKE G ..---` ,I17C N n--- AERATION AND RECIRC- c2 g i+,;;.,;_ ,,.._ .?..._._`r: ::::v=: ;:-; --v.:::-_:/...:...:.::.. c._.fcRA :W.y�.-.......�._...._.Wr!.:__:_...... _ R^VF :,..L 3 O .. �(: Cl: �`......_ ..... GRatlEY-_....-� I 'RAyEL c .A. -ULATION SYSTEM TO BE Q L Z Z U WQ I;'t I—}__I_.1-.....-._-. ..- ....._............ CONCRETE'COVERED WALK • ...... .__L._. - -•:'-.- PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. tl _ -__ 'o-oLL I •I I j VEL GRAVEL - , r' ..... ...... ......N, SDMH ' •--: .: L-mom ...... - $) VI I I MH 9 18 --.,CONTRACTOR i In 5 -. I F .. ;:"LSD-1 ';�' .. a M1 a ,`.APREVENRANSPOR SHALL -, , ..: TRAIL WOOD LOG ,. CONTRACTOR STORAGE •,_...,..:.: Fy;K... (4) 10'X18"WOOD LOGS (Tr4- ".-. "'i` '`10 8'x 8" TYP "'•SEDIMENT TO EXISTING �. 'SB :/z __ �� ) )_ DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN _ I{�.Y�DyVM - ,.... __ ; .. ._____ _ __ ______ _ - -. ____{ `Y_ .3 = ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFI- x? I I t II ;..;, _ i GRA55-- _ _.. - - '' ~°, �-lII-5 ,mom•. ,`:,{,0 CATION 02710. I 1 �r..•l _ _ .._-- •t j •: r, -- -''(1),1¢';X•78"WOOD LAGS(TYP) •�~n� •.";1 - _ 1 ON THIS SHEETRE -_ - - - - _ •.................................:_..:•--.----------::...----.---...._..__:_.:...._...: ...._.--.---.-_-_..-._-........ •-'`,....- .DAMAGED OR REMOVED • >"' Id ,; r • i /l dz.:. --_.... - --' 3-.- IRRIGATION R RINT CONYSTEMTISH OF • -W ai —_.,..._--.--.y,-,' II: `' r + _. - _. --_.. _.. x ,,?'?, ,. - CINDER P ....-_. ....-_. -•REPLACED SYSTEM SHALL BE U Q•' a$ / +?i.,T t 1$ .•^>.,.,.«~ _. _- :.REPLACED. k �E j• +( 1 ' A �•:n' --- S IRR -..-__.,_,._ - ` g...... I ...... .,.,,.<y IRR+'. «,l :,���... �•tE ; • ^.''ll ,;:, .I :' .. !SILT FENCE�C NC:�.i� _. .......--_-...- ..-_. - ,:a I :/ di hAss i` co'NCIOEs�Wr .. i • I ,I , 1; '; •q ! I! I I{'{` •`Q !b (18)9'Xe"WOOD L //(.... '�,'� 1 '� - „ ., ! r 1 $Q- t + .••� a�. BOf4: ,in.;,l.•, �L�NOS .. �• • GRASS AREA $'it ad1 CLEARING LIMIT, . I _-� $ .. C A FENCE(TI'P) I � ~..^ I COINCIDES WIT14 • -y' • _ �`• -_----�-- `t--DEMOLITION LIMIT —------- _--_— •.y, _- -_ _ -__ , -- _ :. --__—u.— i: Q f i r � C~_ -_ • CSTC'STORM WATER .ram- , ..--....'�"""y:.�- -- p• `4,4, },(1,S) 8'i WOOD LOGS (TYP) DETCNTIppN� POND /• n 111�' _ GRASS $ l -- AND WE7IAND �,i:\� p't :�,) $ m d 1 I s _ 19Io`. .; , „ / (5)e'XB"WOOD Ocs(Tm) g •N]�,.60Q + 'I -,,ANµµRS ,'1,,, '`N ,�•. - N]],600 ‘:Vs,,,,,,,,..... 7 ti .. _ :,,!_...,...: COM _ -_ _::__.::-_:M'- -- -- _ - -- - - _ __ _ _- _ - jam. _-'-- L , ,. „> ...:•,:. -" -�'• '��.__�- 7=•;T-..: C0� � v,,' •1436 D 8••-•' -_ I � t• ` I `' '.,), • !•�� — •. „ .,, Ia ! I - -.-•-• 1 t- `-�- csrc sTd21A,+�nTER _ � ' -f._,: - 1%""� ,, ` 1' .j l i i \ '., ,DETENTION FOND A I :-" �1��7i%�`,' 1' 15 "CB LI �` ;I v.,l_f AND;WETLAND .-..... _ :'NTE ``f I. ', PONT+ J4: A _ '1.. •.PLAN �,/f"% rIP0YJ0/ ^D.POND\v ,�' o _� "I .: ,•ifi•�i`•s i i oy;NwE�eE �,"�9y ., w .`�• . oM, �� la `'� 5. q 20 10''_s 20' 40' e rg I =;s=�, 50 K - I ''_ 3 55 it-1:7T■ st/;S�fc2�1t Lr VIA t•A 6 s1 N l t/Z SC ZS.[2�,R 41,IM, •- 6I 6 65 1 ] 68 6• ]0 ]I ]2 ]3 I ]5 —r— PERMIT SET 1 KEY PUN 85100038.0w° 907 T',, 1,4 6 1--"''11.11:,•1':-.11'../.146; 4- ,1V 1/ ..4",'AC1.11tI.'... ',OLE OF POND §I /I:e•,' '1+ (,);9f 8'::1?:s:..1.-',1:'11''. 11;",1•'•,:`..1.fI:II,8.,4R1C,F; -,es'...n\\*.\..,,',,',::\,..,\\',',,,/..,:::„.7%"P6./`,/082'" ,/7 , ,..../ i./!/:,p../," 2,W/2://5,..,/..//.../7.>/---/A/12/5.7/6../ •N ..._ ,• . '--•-- N OTES 2 /I1/ ‘ , 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL , INFORMATION,SEE DRAWING G4. 4 CULVEli:l- ;\;:.6'••3if 0 ..; j i•; 1 ':,'‘.\ ,\\\ PSW .9,. //%1 .11 //,4,4•/"'..Y71:/"-T-7-7-;•:-Z-Zi ::,..1,.?.,/\ \' \ . \ ..'t \ , 0 1- . 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING 0 6:9 ?:41,),,,:.,/;: '4:•,,g-TT-,e,7 )=g,,, 4§, ,,...,...,\\\I, ....); , .,. 44./.,..Ari/.A4,A..A..A.-/-1 // / /.. ..•..X.XA,X 7., .., 17.;r).,......, , •,... • NOTES AND SYMBOLS, Y L;-' .6-:.•7-'•\•113.1. .4....i,FiceoL,..g., mo ,,,m,-.„ ,,,,,,,,.\\\ , ii ..,, . i , , ,,.,;?c,,,•0".4.--,-/-7)/ // / / -x...x.%•./.%.,•.),,./ --, \,...... ,s . •. . SEE DRAWINGS G3 AND G4. CC 0 . 2'..z se_ •''fr''''''''•'I-.-;:i-i'''•.•r •, ..;' "--° 09;\\,.'''' •',' .4sc•/"kA n" //I.A Av;Y=g 21r`z--/!:.' / // / / //ic..x.V,>:,',{ ii.• : \ • \ .„..,... 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOUT1ON 1 § 3,2 a_ • ,,,,..-- .. ,tc , , ._ ,.. , ,,- .,,,. ,,,...•.....,,' v1.W.a,= :9 / //4. / / ///s>5 /A,/0e>cs% / K e ,,f v.../,... 1 \ . AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ s' SEDIMENTATION CONTROL i1 'hit;"; (03 ••• •5'?:•6,?-- I-ttle, ; I 1A.:1-....36.. OA\t"... ''.41, ; I / ). /X/ /1.4 / / 7A/4;r:2/ // 4'IV, /Y / /\?:,?4.,.{:x I *. ----- NOTES,SEE DRAWING ",...; =Ct.°;64; L.-.r-- ......:.0. • : t .----:- •::,1 • -;-;,c., f ; ; 4 y!/ 4`g / e/Y,,.0// / // / 2••(/\;1,,•\./ 4/:•'/? ' \ RLROI ... : : I ,------`, - '•-•"----k"-•-, '':. '"---,'''; I '2 I//, '/ / % 4"/ / / / // / /IV/'/ 2s.X%,/,V.•:%./.; , ',. , , =\EXISTING STORM DRAIN- II 3< —,2 CULVE,RT 1 i , , . i ' .AGE SYSTEMS TO BE -.,,,M zI7C IF 12 RCP(SW).=994 , i ......,,+ I ,•••-.3 i'3,..i.,fr, • ;.:..(v)1.-••L414-7,4•A''' V.049/67'/ / // / // /V 4 44.\/...1X A A4:•;:/\6t-';?, L, . -..-..,,.. PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. 6C C3 C-1 1 1 LAKE ' •• -. Z1.1.1 ,.= I ,Y n. :•'-.1/ ( '1J‘ • Y I/ 24 J.l'iL PSZ/ // / // / //9"/61AS0(4A4/Y4W-;;,\•) \• ..„..,,. , 0 0, - ,a -, „.. ,,,,,,„! I 7./5.67 •,, ='ZaNOGN AND RECIRC- IL CT '•:1 ''''4' '" :: ' 36 '''.1'("')="3 f..-1% 1 ; r':;' :11-11-1-"--.; 7 V!4' 2.;Q:630.2 / // / / / / / 47Igi1/266ear EA/•Vt•X V A • \ . ULAT1ON SYSTEM TO BE -.....-. p 0•cn m • - LUK"' / / ,/i/i/ /4 /?/ / / / / / / / / / ** / / / r.4•/,,,4,,,.,/.4; ,, , PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. --_,.........-_-_- - : 1 '. .:f?••'- ;•g MILa ' ' • ' ; ' •'; ; :I? ; / YN.:PI 7 / (,,,/ •K ,e.„/./ / 2.„,?.., ,,,/....;< /,-, \ •••• i 0 i -,t • . •z5 DIA X OA.A 2 LR N . "1-....,.. ...-... .1 .,CONTRACTOR STAGING, I-Y-,LAYDOWN AND STORAGE k ' .. ''... -. .4. L, • X /rr 47.X 7'27'1X.: / // / / / // / / A1./ / / /'. ;A:.71'1X,/V ' AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL ir 5 . --' "'\_. I '• 1 / --i "-., ,' ' ' ',- ' ! I I i 1 I •• '; . ',\ •'..1 .:°1 ' ',,. 1.'-.--- - -'-'..---- PREVENT TRANSPORT OF , /;/, // /y/ / / / / / / / / / /-,e./ / / /,,..cx.,/..:„v .c./ t.... -----—........ SEDIMENT TO EXISTING I I.: ::'::,:.7.IRE r 4'^t-,.) ...- t'. ;• e I-,;"1 1 •t' 'Y!); // /ii!.// // / / / // / ///::;% / / /k,:;<2\?.,">(.''-‘; ../.•/ '1""•.,,r,\9g,,<,0,,,,42. ---- e-----•• • -•• DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN I t 1:61:,,,,,,IrIl,..- / ..i t$ '', ''': !! 4 t 1 i' ' I ".. ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFI- i lil 1 ;s4--.1 ... I, ' II I-,1,4 A/;);'!/1// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //\7.,y"..X:::/, %.../ • \ ..;,'' '-... -...;_•- • V:, ! , , ! I • ! CATION 02710. / V., C1-tk, '4'7._ 1 1,4 ...? V.4,:. / / /•y / / / / / / // / / // / ( / / ..,..),„,,e,:x.'k:::( 4„., PLANTERS / I '' '"4. -.;: ,'„J ,:. to i ,tA,,/,:y.1/ / / / / / / / / // / / / / / ,,t / / /,(,..?,,...x...:„.e.;:?..,.?;..x, • >"Z •,J . • i i ! . i I''':::.1.-i''.--..11' 1/;>1.);*,/ / / A/ / / / / / / / / / / / / i•-;// /2.•,. .,sx „? ,-,:./ >,/ / • --i•i. I ,IA ''''' ',I''':.1.,•:',.:,:i...... X.,/A 7 / 471V / / / / / / // / // / /11,/ Ar// 7\7...‘./..'1, . .';'?-:::.7 7'7,./ / . _..... /1),..::,)5f04c9,850/911-4,/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /*.,..//.",/,//-X,7.../..:?(:>•: *::"..-7,eS4-Z.-/-4.,/_,/../_-/-/--/-/-/ /_/_. ":7 I; I." 1 ,i,I 04 :7Z ; ! ':.7' I '''t',"- . 1.4-d4F?),/v.-/w1/ // /// // / / / / // />k,/ i./ />•,?..-.Z.-:.:?.-2-41/4::-..-7.--/-L/.. .z..(..z.../..e.-%_-..-,-`7•:4....4 gg .. . _ • i • i •• •, .• • • . k t ,:a.,. ••/‘/).y -7./ /iii/ // // / // / / / // / / />t,/,./•/ / 2.--/:>,::7:.-/-57:.-y•=2:: ---z7i::/::-/_-7.::z.-.2.':• •••/:-.z:..27../-•/-/ _.. . \., •• , • • • • , ,- i -'b1,SV NON. ‘.) ' 'iC:. '1 :if\)••Yt.//_4'24/ //.// / / / /1/4,0' / / / / /// ,i::( /•-/ /Au/ErAL-c.2,-/_.../-/-2i:Z7--/—/-/j2.;i:-/-./::2:::Zr..,:e PI 4 I ,a i 1_.. ... _. _•....... ,,,, A A, ,-,.., A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ,..../ A/ y,,,, ;-,•,-/_•„,-,.„../../-/--,...„-/,.., • LIMIT FENCE(TYT.,),101 ±„ 1,....,•I' , : :I I ; -..,. ---------------•:- -.----- C;14 T/t.A//:t1,4"/>47.‹./. / / / / /// / / // / / / >IV/ / // // / / 7-7:--V.X-X-X.X---/-74-7•7 / / / .-: 4 : I 1 It ,; ; I ; 1 •:). Y II; ,,.4.E.-LITI ;:..;, , •; ') t--I ; I ..44:;/1.'y y /-/-/41-/, / /4':(.:/../ / // / / / / / / / // / //'7-.;f-,,,,,15,.../..,./ /../ / // / //I/ / / /L' / /1 , f i PROPOSED B. IRRIGATION , V.. ' Asmoo,.' ' \.. ,'1'''..1 ' kn )',V Y\2 / / /A./ / 2 2/ %/ // / / / / // / / / / // / / '''''.4‹.,V / / /./.,-,-4..!.A.:1 /,../iX...,6,Y • ., 1 ,. , •' 1. cuLvE8r -*--44---,--: 0---1--I----ILAII - tf GUY ANCHOR,. '•'`.) ' ".. 1-i(21,-/-\//t-Pf-V1'.-X0/1 / / / // / 2'.1•/ / / / / / / / /-/-/-/-/-12-/-/-/--/--/-7‘7'7' -/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/ -----— 1 \ ilI/ REMOVi ALL \T1CS IA• I k • • . P ., . ' .. .A',' V/ / /i.e / / / / / / / { / / / / / / 4'K ,r, /,-.4/ / / / / / / / / / / / / ', • ' WITHIN IDEMOUTION. (r) 1 In „,, "1T.1' \ , '`,. VI,7,;7\V / /.7 V / / / / / / / / / V.V /Z/ / / / / / // 1771/7 /7 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / _ i 4 I '• .-,• .1:.- i' . . ....'.4 1 ' '\ ;.•4\ ••1•', VI.1?710%°F'476f./6,Z / / / / // // / / ZIDEATEruir // / // // / / / / // / / / // / / / / / oi 05 , q CLEARING LIMA' 1.." (4" § I § § ; ; ; . ; FENCE OW ') t I \ : /y, ,/ / /.A.. / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / // // // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / PROPOSEli,SHEET . . , COINCIDES WITH I I • • : • • : .: Eli --- -- - i 1 DEMOLITION LIMIT PILE SHORING i. IVAIXt. /"/ A/ / / / / / / / / / // / / / // // // / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / i 'll(DE 'umir) • ,,c:N•li•--- -..k- •'/;••/••/ /'',‘ // / // / / / / / / / / // / // / // // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /4r, 5 . i , tt.,‘,. /,/\./ /V / AV / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // //./ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ':'.., 0 A ,,9-•I. ," • 1 7 - 1--- ---- - - - -I 4-- - 1...' -- ----- i --- 47A 1 A '.,,),,\(•,2 .&,/, / / / z z z/ // / // / / / / //// / .:-.:.-.> /-/ /--/2 /--/-/-/-/-/ z/-/-/- -- _,-, ,7 7 I , : , 3 ,.;?c.-",,-, -i'' li .,'x', 1 i . <1' PF03f4dge EN,WMENT 0 CST:C, 1).!.../1c1IX "/ / 41;/ / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / // // /%"17•147( / / / / / / / / / / / / / it' Jig le 'f 7 ci B4E 1 I • 1. : i . • PETTE,NITIO717111..00 AND WEILAND,) , .; , .\ •,. 4 , 6 /y1,. L...=. /07*Gfi AL/17E41.4 EL=8.5 ., ,IA„.11'',71,/ X.//// / / / / / / / / / // / /0// // // / / A,/ / / / / / / / / / / / / A 22 23 ,..5 • :I , II "I i I 1:. •I .: , lo ! '4(V.Y1 / 7 /V/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /.S.V / // // / / / >\<,...,/'''%./ / / / / / / / / 4,-J "Aga 'IR -•- '''' ! //,/,/.;// • :_, ‘. '.'-...' 'Y '.',/,X / / /'Y / / / / / / / / / / / / / /L“%'// // // / / / / /,e / / / /// / /,,,K/ 11- ,, q 8 6 . 20 12: 2 20' 40. , ..---4 • ) ,• ___„-vit.-...., 2 - - -r- 55 53 6 55 ItiASECALMILILLI oi17 58 6 70 --- - .A. 1---PERATIT—S-ET---1 KEY PLAN 1 g L —07.27.88 J x5100039.0w0 5L22 N 72,200 1 ! ! sit '1 i : . : RA' \\, \ : .A,Ak.A,r.,// / x/ / / / / / // / / / / / /s/ / // // / // / / /\./ / / / / / /,626'00/ NnTES. I '-'-' i . ,..:(..," us ,,,,i,)„,\.. %.. sk. ,-.7\xce.,.,‹/ / 7,,,,,./ // / / / / / / / / / /•,7i7 / // // / // / / / 7),7/ / / / / / / / - -ihri i / ! , "/ / / / / / / DRAWING G4.CsOENETROL ° 1 I j • :'iI li '09 \ :V.\ \ /V\ ‘,4.,,,T, / 1 '%. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / .•.5 •,,,, ,, • .• . y• • , vi•••,, , ),:, , , , , , , , , , , „ , ,, , , , , , , , , , , , ••., 4:-...., , , /2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING a 1- f " : i 'hi: If ,,f,•. .‘•„. 4 .., '. \ /,/•,, \,.,'•,._ 1 N s•::• NOTES AND SYMBOLS, ,-) STAi3lUZED ' ri .... , ,,,, , Q.." ../ .,.11(.•X /.',/,.//I. (R/ / / / / / / / / / / / /‘•,?' iS......!,,/ / SEE DRAWINGS G3' CONSTRUCTIONi, !ill i i'' / .-4''''''' ,\,, (" \ \., /,' /\‘\\X::\NV.s, /\ k / / / / / / / / / / / /ISEAfT574 TiWNADTI/R / / / / / / / / / / ›,,,/..... / / AND GC / : ENTRANCE 00 : .., ,,.... ,, . . 9 2:; I: il \ In l \ /•/ %,\e,./4.1X,...../;7•\,/';;,‹ / / /,/,./.,,/,,/,./...,/,,% /,)')-AN)7/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /\„(-••/,/3.FA,,?,g.?.Ea,EIABLABETIVETZ/ s• in!'i • ,EP a ;IE,7_,., L., — 1 / : :..: i 1 \/ % /,./.,s/•••%.,)W/•</•'•'4/•••/'/'74 1/°-/ /./ / / / // /// / / / / / / / / / / / / / .%\</)./ ME.NTB/gOlgyOZROL .q°,,,..4 i.-`2" 1 1 '''5'' •. \ /`,/ ,‘24.1..e.\ .\A,/ 3...../ ;;'•;.<, 4././\,/ gthoi, 1 1 sl ?" \\,.''..., '::"';'„ .../')(../..e-/•X'`7, .,73,1467LcATK'/ >',_ \ExisTNG LA,E 6, 0 \ .../ • \\\OVE To Nt- A, .,..,5§ 2 %.,%,,,,. i , , -11 % % _,AERATION AND RECIRC- /,/./ ‘,(4.X.Y.',./...,.. / , / /•::,/ // / / // // // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /0LATI0N sysTEm T0 BE tr.,/_. ... .,';';!? ' •' 1 0,'t - s..:,,,, \,. ,,..://../ }:.,Y.'2.\.%... ..,..N/!!! ', / ,!:">V / / / // // // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /PROTECTED AND TO REIMN. a 01., =, ----• , Tiy I . / i i 1: ', ,. -....., \,...,"/,/,..//..„/..‘X,. .%<",,R. , ., // /'•./..,,Z.../ /__/__// // / / / / // / / / / / / / / /7 1-. \CONTRACTOR STAGING, r C) ' C....96'.1,7 ;I.‘,..i 1 i •. ••• /\i‹'4//•1>'1,./.:••:..5i'ffi•/:'•• • . N/'9...'7'7.4..7.7'`AA;/,/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /,,,,9„,..(A.Lair,„ OWNsTrstSiTATAGE F 202LJ e., 1 ..,. ., g , \ \ . ...,..,,. .x-...,A•;A....• • _______,— .,. g .6 '81.-1) C3 75f, „..._ .. • , : I 1 1 5. r; •I 1!i ... ... Jr' FA -Hy,. , y / /\:•.,/ - 7,_,."-,.,. ........... ,... ---/,_/I" ' '' ".2 44444-4-rr'?7717-7-2.--',, ' 'sPERDELEENNTTTRANT0 EsxPihRTNr : :I, ..-.:•:'•..),../ /\* / //•:<•/..:-/' S'•. •--,.:/-:-./.-/Z-Zt•AP.4.4‘ / / / / ./;•/ // % / / /t/ / /ii../_,..te MANAGE SYSTEMS IN .:, SPECIFI- PROPOSED ENURBEMEtit,,OF CST6.- 4y. . /'2---/-,FROPOSEDeg E-4:1%/_:',2,;,-,2._:-/--/..._Zi- A -.1.2‘ / % 4 1...JII07.-11.7%.,_/.-./'--..CATION 02710. 0 6 ,,IW. ' •,'‘. i , i :' :r I.\!I !:i DETENTION POND'AND,WEN,ND .....',"•/ ,j.../._/._ . .. •''. '''- .-• ..--:7-.227.../....-..•;/::-;?!.y?ad-/,:2-7..../.•/_-./.._/.../././it,_/..../.-/12-. /---- -:',„ I, :.. PROPOSED Bi ;ji. :I; DESIGN...SURFACE EL=8.5.- --,- -.. .. - -,..' 1 : ! i 1 -E IRRIGATION \ ‘.. '' /,,,,X/ 02../.--4,/ -7•,4:A./.. it•-/-2..:_-,-.Z..z--/_7-/--,47Z::7--/---,472:z:z.Lz:z.:17.7./..,,•--/-- .-/:2- 1 1-1 7 i I 1 i r. ::., MAIN • 1..,_•::....1 . - ,/,'/..'' / // /..-7/4:.%-./. ' / / 2-/'/:-2-7-32.7 51il'EZTXP'/--/-/1-_--r-Y.....'TM-T.' -- ! ! si ; 'j ..- j t ,.,-.1,",' \\: ' if ''- .% ----. - - -- --'------- . -VOI7,,44 , - I- .'...'- '1,` 1 ! 1 1 . --/-./ // // <,/ / / /-< ,.-/---•/._ -<<1. / /-/- .._./:/'/L-/-V--/--/-• -/P "/1/ -r.., . .._._ 1..g..'-g1: •.- i•j;:j g,i•.:.i.i, if 04!—" -- t• C :: .----•r / -.. . ,_ -7 ".."./".;":;:.• / 4 \ t1 / / / / / /V1/ Z /Z F,'4RCEL I(..;/.,,,;.. ---•..•-........--- It! /,ii.-)/ / / 42,4/ / 2-7-v,4../.._/ 2/ /,,,,//,-.>/ /2 7.. .40-/-„/--/c4 E pr_MiYI.AU- . jj / • ". --—--— .,.. / 96- P/RCE,A 1' I I....,,.....- _._. ——--—-- --/-/- ,Z_/;/ /'•/'/•'/'"/-/•i'''',-/''-/'-',/,..?/"../.:'/ / ''''/"/'74'7//'".44' ' •/Li/-71'V.'''," ,',REITZ':PIPE/ sf A !I \, ,., (/' cr /' •••,... \ '• /% / le../ / /1/ i''/ / /77, ••:•• --/--/-72--/--/.e %i'%•,-/-:_,_/.__/ /,;?...!-/ /4//1'2;,/ / / /,'/ II IF I i : : c I !:. / ..-. • ' • 1 1 E.-••• - N 72.000 : 1 td /r1"1:'.V--. -±ILF-, ' --" - -'.---" •/:-/-/ 1. / / 4// / /r4"/../ f / /,...;1/./, / // / /.--7 // / /•-/,/?. ....... _,-. .. ------- / /....e.,,, ,e,-,V.0i- -/ -44--/./-/ ..(../ Az‘7.//-/-/-/ --^7,,:' I ; • •• t •::? r:!'. REMOVE ALL TREES . ... / /V1r/ /.-.. "-/.. / / /./.s AO..f. /_.-/-7.-2 // /*'./ / / / / ' // / / / / / / / i --- • " *II-I ! •• ///, I ' .i:j ;: .,-... C'''' i iiii ni:.'",.. YATHIN DEMOUT1ON / / / / / /-.2K1'. -./... -2 / / / / / //5<\_/ / / /_,-'/ 11 _r .•_, i , ,rfew,v,„ ; 1:•:, •;; , UMIT(TYP) i f/i i :j. /-49/14i,i. ; '-`1 i );:. .77- //a // / 2,./ / // /./)/_--/--/ /4,,_,-2 /.- ,// / // / / / // / / !•*•*d!!. ' "/"' /a/ /X/ / / / / / / / / / /t 6'69./11.; !i i ! I ./ •••• ../I ll • ! f i • oli9/1 '•-: -•-' '''''''''''"'""'"."'"• "'" I i / / // / .•,/,j/ / 1• / / / / / / // / / - / /4/ / /../. /./---/// /. /_ tii .,.. /A .' }\\._ i :1 :,(//41/„ _ , _____ -;,, .., ,.. l• CLEARING LIMIT i: ,S q.,////, / / / // // // / / 1 / / ' / / / / / // / /,'./.. - -..•< / / / / / / / / / / / / - -- °N ''...r.".:-"•./ : FENCE(lYp) • j !:i f .fs ,///p„ ----— 1 .2-• i , i COINCIDES•WITH ! 1 I c i "159459/ — .........." / // / / /// / / / // / / /./ / //.../7 i / // / / / / / / / / / / / / I ; DEMOUTIO?UMIT : 'Tf , t.,.. .... //4,,›• ' // / / / / / / / / . / / / / 2'-/-V// /V / / / / /X / / / / / / / / / '-----: 1 / j i •, ' 11 ....r•-i! ';" . . t ; i / / , / // / // / / / / / / /,-,/ / / / // / / / / / / / .( / / / / / / / t I ;!: ! i v.,. - :.-- / / / / / /// // /., / /,fr.;•/ / / / / // / // / / / / / / / / / 7 , - ,,:i. 11111 , / ' . ; I ''' I r'; i . 1. . ,0///// / // / / / / :f/ /...-% / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / i I. :;1 /'...' / // / / / /''.,%-' '',..4:( / / / / / // // / / / / .. ../../../„/ / / ../-/--- / i I ! i 1 1 / I . 1• * .4 / / :1 ..... / ,/ / // / ,,K.-"/ / / /'/4 Z./ / ' /Z /,/-/ /.../ / / / 7i. / / I III ,/ / /I / / /-";f41r// /,. / / / / / / / 7.. /-7/ / / / / / / / / 7 X.„ / / 5 /1 %:-' • 'i' i 1 ,i?!; , ; 1 / / //// / // / /5?,57 / / / / / / /,•, / / // // / .../...-/-- / // ›... / wpm •_—_. i ;i:g •-• ., -7 7 / ;7,7, / / /.../-// 2-4 /. /-.7e- / // i8 . , 15.3.„,_ • • ,0 N I; I 1 : ! , 1 .. i: -*L.., 1 \,7:_,i "---, // _7,,,r,r,,,:x/ , ft../ / / , 7......,,,- ,-2...4„7-7--, 7 / / / /-7...7. _.4.7 ---.....„ ; , --,. ,., 16 • 2 0 / /:••:11(419//QV /9 // // / / / / •14,/ •••••••-......_. .. •/1 I ta4 ' ••-5 5.18 1 I : ill '..,. \ , ,.. 8 , , />•:*/ / 'Al4, / /// / / / A/ if../ . / // // / / /. ../ / // •.......... t '64 5,K, - 4, - _.,1 1\ill .../\, ;, ( / /!/ / / / / /-254i/ --„, / / / / / -/ / ,s,..e._// ..../..-7'/ / / / / E1 2,'' ',,,,' \.- t ';' I !, /! .( / / z / z.--i / / / / zzAzIzi.// .4../../ / lr-../71.1/ / / / / / /•." .. "8 Z 20:Jcz_s 21:3' ;. • _., ig I 5a Cg •,...... 3 1 55 11.IP.SIC 25.I.231.l•CU 7.A...77 68 6 ' 1,7 :.'<• 71 72 73 7 75 - r- KP _rY.& 5 1 g L DATE:07.27.88 J N /.,::, %51000AC.VNC 9L23 M 6 A)1.2V / / /,3 / / / / / / / / / / / /✓ // / / <%/ / / /I Y y / / / 4/ / / /.4".„I 9-OiAsw/ACXAIION�, ...+I •� M1N,.. ...., w / ,1 j ".ueAeiE:ro cacn, ;•;.:<'; 'i:i:'- �` '•:-�`��."ti,,., :._:< ^1 NOTES' I s• s�/ar_A - `f• T,.+�,.T.`,.., i'` "It . �,;:` \ - .1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL ��P 0 / / / / / /% / / / / / / / / / e:!'.. / '%,% /..fu pI[d it.yuE,(Su ry»• •'%`/-°�. /•. _ •,.4.0 `:'D: - :./ i/ ./ RAa �,s{ ;?E.:• , _ `' ^ -`� •'�y,; INFORMATION,SEE � iFa` i✓'� ' .s��is DRAWING Cq. / /l/ / // / / / / / / / /,/.••'. /t// /no'(a c,'6'!`-.C"/'--; '^. %:a: ' ///''.' • � f 7•., 1'ol..r:a<•Aeovs''''..`.,,, .' -�i_'., V LCSTC STOR W/�T)A a :Cr" i.-Sc^� ▪ , •• ".r% i' `• ':' - '�!' 'i't N,••', .rb'•DI'P✓C CL's'nl•JU.- _ _ / / AE7EN3YON�POND/ / / / / /. •/ //`/ / e% /?l -%/ /. � '' �j' t tf /� .2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING U .•/`.. _ :t ,i- - t., ':':'r, NOT D WE7�N0 '• /: •„r.' � I' ' ''•, ;s:. ES AND SYMBOLS. Yw / / / 7 / / / / / /./�/ / /�/ /if%.Ij/.�;FI'•'/.fj� %.•ai �7: , -;( SEE DRAWINGS C3 •-•i'i - AN Lv•'1: 's' aGt. D ca. 6 t K JA� ''4 /'�k+P.F •I: �.^�'rA`• ft L"'CONSraitL]1[m.- a T �.. / �/ro rrty 9',.7.9. .+'::- _ _ _ -_ r r[r+rr /'• :y 3.FOR / / / / / / / / / /.:�:✓ / / %' .� ,�'' _ •Ir. _ + GENERAL DEMOLITION 9 � wr �' _ C✓l �----- �.-_i AND TEMPORARf EROSION/ '.✓' - •/' SEDIMENTATION CONTROL / $g w w An •f 'r' r r '.� a+' a' /-,,,-..,_....,.dcNsrxuc nw+ :'. NOTES SEE DRAWING ow WAn f,/,/^--�� / / />'l••./// /i/�'`/,:% ,a % _ ,i,r _ %s+ •, - 9L801: ,i' U H M • "1 !' p'. §i0¢ 6.•-"".`` - J 2.5'OIA i( E ABOVE OROIING':•' ..w /.•'�"/ / /�'•/ / �/ 'G`G f'.f;/'% %''-,✓'.• �„�:. +,, c�;i`'� EXISTING LAKE A zd 't1 O • I�Tr.,+.! �f ' j �' "[° '. }. r`� »:+G� .i': r P ar�vc u.=I.r.l9 q • - %/. // + f// :y,' ./ ,t .,:f '• AERATION AND RECIRC- ¢ 2 ,ter •wp^..,.�-` f' - 1+> ` ULAnON SYSTEM TO BE U 0_ O / % / _ PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. J '-'f`.,/,/ / =/- bPt('�yJW{>r,E46,,i % /,-•:' -,••" .C?+ /•• EXISTING LIGHTING L 3 O j, :F h::1Mr-vr ( �`i`.r (mot';, .,. = S'S7EM5 TO BE •0 3 / / /•. >S, ./:/.✓ .1 'V>.4.t/Ev-p,./ /,% 4R'"� Fl., -,•.,. ,'p, f.• ,.-' F U Z w W ' _;,,yr S'.-, '▪ 4 PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. L 1' -U "Z O _w¢ - 7 _ _ d j �tJt \ - '����• -•,$P' 'AREA IRJDER - •� g .�' .� •,,, • A�• •, .�=�>_ �6" cDrlsrnucnoN ... _ ' : ::...is 31.- 1 .✓ PROPOSED'SHEET` ,�P I��� ,_ gip .:•' %PI RING _ '••d"••t �I "�. = F:6,•0 E,lriP ••. /_ ---%,/'--%•%:%•:/ 'i.+' (D N(ATIRy MIT) �.n.. i w •}t`'+ IA z - • - ��' .' ; , .- :fir::{_=l! -`. .cz"w a @ ..., .. t; .. . . , .�. c ,. . =5- E-'w ,:/..1,1;.1 //.: � ._ -/•'"/./0fo-. i ,/, i ,\`. e ':t _ ',.J_ A.f*Y , fP_/.,./ rl* .�al1 ; T a'� :-a:� '''::1� -- ,....▪ -s..- i — A. _i s s ;•'_ 09a .:Id 4,°��.-...• -..._ .:L:<..f i: o ..,.._,. 1 II t .. .-.... • e�zoo \ •^ ' CLEARING OMIT ;' ,: ("-s: -'--i--"--., ' ,. Y�, / / / / / / /'/ LWETLrtND"B'.: FENCE(TYP) I• <' ) - ,'•;. ,.PARGE_L"/'_ t,J''',,— _ -.: -4--: - 1. ni. / / / / / / ... / BOUNDARY % COINCIDES WITH •-.= \ `�.• 11 S : .f... :nREA UNDER _ DEMOLITION LIMIT :;:..•,,', / / / / /- '% / / ' :; . i1• `'� i`. 'LONsrRCILIIOY S Ili -L.�.-/% // / REMOVE AU.TREES ..' �:'i' -.::!_L _l,. ! - - PROPO PROPOSED EENJIONGEN7 1 31 ___/__// / OF CSTC OETENJION WITHIN DEMOLITION [. : I ' 1l %I.' %' :: ............... 7 %•a POND AND 1FACE]D LIMIT-(IYP)__-__-_______ -.`.--'.:_—__,_•: —t_'t.___—_— ____ __— ___ ____ !' — _ _______ _ i I - / / / / / DESIGN-,SORFACE.8.5 ,{ t t - ,1._ l', I_ i' sr i { I, 1f • i i <+� ,A.-:-„;,-,.._ pP •"i: r"' `.. ti1 '/I IJ ! t" ........... :: i ;2 r--�.: il i. 1 • • 1• J' re 5 - - - _. a- - - - -_- - - - r• IRRIGATION �� •.t �` ._✓s r�!+Q 1�_i' ._ __ -_ — �`y i�_ir t:.; - �'�`: II 0 - - - - Q' 111,E - - "— --_, _- - - - - .. --,,-:._.1 -_ _: ' ':�t''''. —, :- 5 i' _.,/i r• /' oN 0 (, /f• i - � ▪- r ----"If �"to_ _ i' ! 1,1,`11 _ AREA UNDER,, _. l''' ..•.{ :••• ...........::.t'.;:.V.:.. �J� API 1 :.1 CDNSIRUC)10N+• '1 lbw:`% - '�� 1, 22 (//�oGbb%` .:a_. f 4`.(', • L' I' i:a . 1 ;; :n :' BUILDING 25-20 + , Q YfA.n. -.• i'i , i'': {, i II r{t h;, ry 71.050 `E -A ���� 5 ZS ?G29 ;-� so 55 P. N ILIA9[25.I.2I C.0 , ,E. '=� fib a io n n 73 ] n — — — — — — — —r PERMIT SET, KEY PLAN — ^4.4.0140I 2\2200\X5100041.DWC 1 m ""'" �'nsl SHOWN s'�` _n� BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �03.04.98 CITY OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT '..%�t\ 1N RENTON _� ME/ Pmnn:rrqq/Bwm n0 PPOSP Wee„9ePe. DEMOLITION & TESC PLAN 9127 NO. I 1 REVISION BY 1,[Alt APPR "AA. Gregg me P.L.M,,0!sDatc, GRID 27 ^ , mom(l� IP C�n yomz I 8'IRR DIP 5' ", , R g-,';1 1 { \ ( 4'..':'1'__..1...`24 --.:'..4,---......................................... 1.---,"- v f tf !i- ' r^5ms '', I '''.\ �m 111 ( ii Irr moo y,\ z ' ;1 U� Iii IL' j • . : E 52800 -—.I1• •, I I .y' ............:.:.[.8:i'2D.1' \\ \ \ \ \ '',I `\ '2 ... : • • \ \ )1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ',,x. ,',•.\\ i K\ \ \\ \'\ \ \\ \\t�Yxa .•\.; ,: \ \\ \ \',\\\ \ 1, t,r ` \. \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ H\ \ \ \ ' U \ \ \`\ \\ \ . \ \ N 0 U ■ . [I•■ . ■ . ■ ■ 0 ► . • . \'•\ \ -....�.,\\\ \\.:N{..N:\ \\ \ \ \ ' \\`'\ \ \ \ \ \\ \'••\ :t t, \\ \ \ } \ \ \\ ;:%'...K-\\ \'\\ \`'L: I\ \.^\,_ -\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ 1!! i I. \a\ \ \ \t\ \ \ \ \ \`X'••1-\ \ \`\\\ \ \:'\ 7' \ ' \j::\ \ \ \I\ \ I I \•\ \\\\•\ \ \\`;\'r\ \ \\'?N\ • >..\, \\ \ \ ?. \\ 1 I , \\ \ \ \\'•;\ \\ \ \\ \.,ti: .;\\ ti':\:\ \ \ \\';: ij j ,\,...\ \\ \ \ . \\ \\,\,\ \\ 1 : _�ti\\ ,, , „ `'1 \,,• \ \\\ \�\ \ \ \\\ \`%\ \....N1,\ \ \ \ \ \ , •E 53, o ''\h..\ /f/ff/ f,j /ff/fff/fe \\\ \ \ \'N \ \ \ \\, \1` \ \'-I\mil-\ \ \\E 3.<°'` s. ` rf` f//y/y///// //////////. \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \.%\ \\ N_\\\ \ \\ \ \\ '1.`: - ` 1 Ioo f/ /ff // � \ \ ''•\ \N \ \ \\.•\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ ' -`^,'A j.• I .2 f'' ///i.. \\ \.\ \ \ \ \ \`:\ \ \\\\�*Y' .\••4\ \ 1 o fffff �'/i/�y '`, '�\_\'--\\ \ \\\ \'\\ . \/, ```;:\`-.y+:. •.\:: ! z fy/f// �''�fyyj', ' .,\\-a.\...\ \ \ `\NX \ - -z \ ` ._ , as f/fffff *f v I Ap i o "\ m�� — /jffff ; \\\ • • -'I F, } \\\ /f�ifif \, L °i L. <.., I I I. - ti ook,.Qp0 oo momgp ognz61rl= o2o O egP Egq ,, ., UI r* E d- �� 8 yi A� mood y cnp ?� "pp AS 1r 1a wafir i �;JOyZp 1. z Z o won S r yp �2oo o ^ z o>on oo �zz Pg 1 N n. NOTES; `'S.._�_.._._.:'_ l I'. i 1, I' ;i' y 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL _ • _ .-7' INFORMATION,SEE _ .. _ -i�," I ` r--:;y I'•t,, J. :.tl Ij r -I ji'S DRAWING G4. 9 - t' j' 5 t 11 ; ^.t'- Z NOTES GENERAL AND SYMBOLS,G -.1 j jj: ,I; SEE DRAWINGS O3 U t '•i �1 t"y �\ i ct 0 ''',IT l� : - AND G4, Qa a N TI.eoPy_ It•�J /,',' __ {+ t N AI'eoo 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION w \i �+ s + '111 AREA UNDEht , '; ;t`. ; , AND TEMPORARY EROSION 3$g O. / • '1•I CONS rRUC nON J ..�"•y t•'• SEDIMENTATION CONTROL/ 9 18 Ftw N ,i..• ^i._.._..t :1 RRIiOATION MAIN u 1t,f� .- •••i --,___- '•. NOTES,SEE DRAWING Ai 0 eD 1 ••1 ram: ,.�, n 'ts. _-k 9L801, iI -{ Ir z O f/F�ffj�, %(' ,•IV, rr• 9• '1....C., `j,Y `:�1 ®OTHERS)IS HEUSTOP ACIURRENTTLY �3bbb;;;•�:::Q Z fjfff 1 Vst....�. _..�% (• �_, ~``I 1 ': IN DESIGN/PERMIT 0¢ O O /. {lf ��._:.._. 1 •\-- _ =' 1 :t ,S.;M1 '4 _.` PROCESS,CONSTRUCTION z w F f// \ 1 1-t - IS PLANNED FOR SEPT a = i fi/ �R 1 BUILDING 25-20 998. HE STOP FACNTY e ,7•03 Z ' 1 \ WET AN�f/�} '1 %' %I -`1 11 '�' IANDOOBE PROTECTED 4 L U E w O `:1 O90)NDARY Off/� J LW . / ,:? 6'CONSn2ULnpN .g.- : •�( �ff/ff "�: 'INCE 1�'` ETRAILERS TO ..-. r ................-.__.. O / - 7 6 € NJ 0 t f// j ,! ING UMIT REMOVED BY OTHERS. M0 ur Q f �'/// _ -- t1�'I; CEO NCI ESPWRH •'-,�1 .1j 1 FOR DEMOLITION OF rt , / - -_ DEMOLITION UNIT...--.-•"';'-, 1_. STORM DRAIN,SEE g !j/ J„i; DRAWING 1c(D)28 1 1 i • Se �'• P = />/{yj 1`ii eIii :b FIRE HYDRANTS TO W _:i /f L:-.._.. 1`.t a PROTECTEDD 0 OO .pi -�-".1 _ /fJ�ff __ _. �_>:: 1il t REMAIN. F•' sy % - -�- f/'%"'. '-' ' •' -" ins .-.'`l i t BE 5. F"w 8a / "•ic>� _•_ �, r "� •.,: I A' ,: / %/ 1 .-="��... - fff '" / ,1!fff / , / Pi{OPOSEO�..`-•WETLAND-'"H" fff I�v ��I rL; •/ L' m 'E -�- -[1NOERORNN hr ARY fjff~. .... :, ./ \ r.�%fff. r^' G YI 'tea• .5' - •.:" --" _.,.-..---J7- __ _ LSOUNDD-ell*.• /.` --- .. .. .. : �-'^ ,y - ./-;^-"'',.:'"�r�,.--" /ffY 1 BOUNDARY;,: • f� �. I' �� - - - Ti'Y1.' jtUCnON . ram' C rt �r�'E sr cP • _.:. _-.._-. . � ... ....�... _."".-..:�- ..._.._. i� .v- ). 1. x !. S • .'•:.._..._. ." _.._. �..-. 6EPnC LANK e �� -'�- RIN I6.61 ,` r La -;w;,.6..N.:.: -- . - - -- - - --•- t - /iai�ii - - - i t 1,000 rR � ' ,` .iyri ri//i /ii/i • I - .•t_ - r • :1 y- -. -tip •' .I: 1 1 1 1 v ,jy{I l i gp a �a 1 1 k L .-: I S • i i E e I - -,'ti y P::J:•-;i? ::•4� AR 1}'t}' YS :.11 _, I f If II; } • • "! f` __ /, _P.mq.vc�ni'AREA i MAILER ^ } AREA `\: �\ 'AREA UNDER r.1 f }11111. '}} �,L'�I CONsrnaFn0N a _ s • ;! !f, }}{"11} ? 'yr t •3 • • n' • ;;. ) I zl z3 "'1_55- {�{} n : a I ;�b 1? w r i }.:•�:: «,:: �� lull f ::�I}4 I y fi - 20' 10' 0 20• ao' I �1�' ti 5 I r /� y �y —3 S 55 g S-I/2,1C/1 ECA r4 II,tC mall 3�'j 5 1 60 65 N IIP=MIT SET y1 91 ,r 65 6 75 o -- —� 'PERMIT SET 1 —KEY PLA — 1 — i L are 07.27.98 J - I fli+i i! fill ; i i :!L .1;8 . _........_.i...,.....,..._ INFORMATIOx7SEE 3.owc 9L29 111 ..11 t .7 I GENERAL NOTES; IC ,1 . ...r2 1 .._....,,,,;- 111 , 1 I ! 1 i • ' ,1.1 .., , 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL / , ; I •- T-. ;4 ; L., j, :„, : • J! • •• .1 : , ; , ,: :: ; ! :::. 1 . I DRAWING G5. A M 11 1 ' • I : . • ••,... -,I 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING •g I : • 11. : 1 /'' ,. it,. :,I; / 1 'II, . I If it I:1,:i i i.. .1 ....---: i .:.., NOTES AND SYMBOLS, 0-' 1, , ., SEE DRAWINGS G4 Y 0 1 • I 11 i 0 N 71,900 ± 1. I r : \ 1 1 R. if, ,i I , t ,.. AND G5. :1•1''71'.1.3 FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION . , k., " L.' I , • ; :' t. . % ' ' AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ " .z ...:; i 1'CITY QF RLTON I ,! , .: .! ± I 1 1 Le.3, a i i - •------------ ?- ,,,,,, ..RIGHT.OF :.;; 11V.-_'1' 8 a :!--,ff• - v - • ''I, II :Ii :. . . , r .! i •• •; • •- .- 4i-i-:.-14-14:4- -!--!--- +14•:•,•i-••1•4:10•i•-44-!•ii•-i-i-i•-j•:•1•;.•-I-•:J.-:0-11,•‘,) !. :Jr :: :j ; . ,; i .. : , 1. i ., SEDIMENTATION CONTROL •:: NOTES.SEE DRAWING 4.,,,,, 11..i-411:- .:1,K1.1!------------ ,i,..1.,11-1,_:.1,21, .1111',,,....'':-.__.."-',...''' .„3'ril-111:-. !I i 11 '.I : if 0-,-.i IA, 5 ; 91801. .... ▪V 7.," .. I i • . . •I 1., I 111 ••••• .1 1 )1 tENTGTOKIV COUNT') I i i;'il 1+ ii.1; 4! ..1..\ §ig ES i -g • . ::. 1 : I i '•I ig I •: +i '• :;'"i I .... . 1 't t TECTE0 AND TO REMAIN. (..1,,, 0 CD :.Pni'+' /° :-. • ' i. Ii x 1 I• KING CoUN.„„.1 _I. ,•-•..,,, 1, .---:-: '. ., ', BUILDING 25-20 r :: . \-.2""11, I 4:, i :, 0 i ; stt:F.R%$_,E*i 11 ! 1 l'i. 1 1 ' , \ET-.),ErX,Iti1,11SJ,G oPvIEJ?,EHTEASDOUND a g o . , : I. . L't&'+'? I.4: ' 1 1 I II'i !Li•••;-,i'''•11?..., .., . . :. ': POWER rsitM TO BE L,K,I .61 FH ---1 1",,,,S.1. -'-1•11:-::: : I 1:1 I II . , • .! :, • I, i 11 ' 1• • 1 11. .t,, ,. PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN .., 'O'V •••;::: : L.co L.- t: • / 9' x '":":!:-. I 1 ' ii!!! II '' i I. ! 1 !! I l: ii '''.: \.--'--..-._ -,:----',-- .''f ).giKiE'91241DNSE2F . DRAWING 1C(D)29 IS 5 1 •i: - ....::: , % ,, --,...-i::-:::------:-V----•.----•.:i•-••::•,---:•;:t' .ci-' ••;•.; i .! J; ! I • J I: ; .! I! I .‘ ... • . , ., :5 4 I j ; • f ! i i! c: • . .. --: - -•-• . .:::u: r. . . 0 •:1; • r .;: ! -4.!. ..i ..:•--.. ! •••;3;,•-:.... I v i .I. ..,; J • ! j i 1 .• \ . az GS • ''1' i -0:1 i,1 g f 4 • !,--! i f ,, ,..•• : ! i • !-,: ! : ir •0 8 E ....-•, ,,,,,, ,1,•so••--- 7,1 ' i I q11 I I 1 I . 1, • gl E-. ' V "--- •,,,,,,,--4/..i. 4--. ,'• : .. ... .+ • -7.,:;-,:++ .;,,. r; ,•••; 1 ; , • r:I'l • : ;, • CB TYPE 1 t_. 1 .. - ,i ...•..1 , I • I ; •,1 : I ;; I : •5. E4w e.c, lOP = 12.48 1 : '; .01'... 1....T .. I,• 11,.., , j I . 1, . I: ::: + if' 7 • '''.I. 1 INV= 8.29 12"RCP OUT E. .; : ,/,:, ![. 1 •/1 II!‘:1 • , .1 .1. 1-... :: l•-11, 1 \ • / P I ..--.(-----rr- :i 1 i:I i:.!.f i I i i 7 p " 1 ') 1:1._ ,:-.------$:- i:: ;• • i „... • - I !:. il,,--,g..•1 , -...; !i, 4K Er. .;• ..................,... ...... ,----,,..-------.---,----- ------;:e. v . ,i-. I: . I: t-.. . 6.: !; .6 i-c ,...,,.\ _ :1-•,„..-:,!,--------[ MHz sY y: q i-. : :;;, .,• .:.j, 20- : ../i.!.. `':-.;'.1.--t.::. !....',-!! ' ':i .-i----1:::- :-. i 1 Ii .,.. ., . :.; :••• .:::::V •,,, i _19 _. .....- i i 0P-L-7;','-iff :.---i--:-.--,?,---.--Ft-...--.,-„.. ,, ..., „ ,,, __:..i.._ ,:„ , , ",, : ... :: •,,,. 9 - ,,,,,. 1,1! I VI y:%,.., .- I. ,• / j ?5:.'• I 11J .1..',I !?•-•1•. : -•-•:••\•••• . • j i--•• P.':::••••••.:•..i. ,., . '•••.`.1,./ /:.?:•:' • 11 ri _z_..., . ...':::Ili.................................................................................. : I :; "tri--.. : "1- :; :',.•,... : :u-j.: : Li.; , :i: : : , ..../:j :i j..-•;I ., ...; 1 :--:•,...,..: -...,--,; ,• i f I; : .:.,‘,,,..? ,,1 .1:,,7;.'W ••:' - il .....::: :11....i.....1.;.:-,..-•-•\ t: :: . • • ................1 -.:.''''...............c'........i.t...i.",.._......-..-..'1...I.11Y..4i/F:',........_..:..° ..!..1.,.it:-...,....:-.;;:1,141:.---I 7..f•..-..-.,...-;:-.5:-..:-.,;,,,,,--- ..----- \ 5 AT - • ic i• f:I : I ,. ,I 6 11:1 //////////////iii//////litgirti*Mirtf////PhYMMilf/////i/illiMMIIHMM///////1/1/t/////t/MMW/ilill//////ni • ,;'r , ..1 N 71900 19,4,, 1 1 • ,• 71,91,1* ....:: . .• FH • 11 ' AVilz,, . . . • LEARING LIMIT:11, + I 1. :!i ,,,,,e , ,, ; ,, 1, ,I i-11. •414,ke,: y • ••7.0 ., FENCE(TYP),,,;••• .., - -I-"-- F.:.i1----...... • •---'11,..i.111:1:.1.11: 11111'•-.. .1_ i •44:-.*::kl7i Ii-...-ittt.iii: -.-•_, i :1 S 1 :••,-,..... -It'I''''':E----i - ''";:i.**1-l/f' '.:::..............4...._..... ':X+.... -':,,,,';•.,„:::.'"'i. j, i ,..../ ...- + 1 : i, , _,),+,,,, 1_.. . ..-..-...-,r1,...- . • ,/ t:„..,\ ;.c/vi..,5g .• • , -,--(•'Efirr j.:-H--,::- .- -1:4:1.!:::-:--1 1., ; : ,•;:. •-_.m., ,•-sswt,,,.0, . -,,,, -.x.... . x-, 1 1 . . ,•,-.-...;.. . • • i ... -.1,.4'. . , ,........•• , ,I;,,I.,- I:. : i I; • i: /////,, ''-..... I I EMI ',el,/ .-. 1 , I 1..3"..... i • ,i '''11 ! :. . /.6j/,,, 5 ..„. , 11. „4. , ,- r'-"A • . . . i !, ,,,i,,'•!••.i I ' 1 - 1 L: - , 1 ..:,,/ey ,.,.,... • , ')7 3 : ....... ...... ir:'.,..„. i: '1 1 _.,.,. ---: ;.- : :: • • 1 I: - .-1-:i.-----:iirT' i 1 1:. • : 1 l • •ilij; : 1 1 WI N.i 15 • ... • I ..-.1I-I1 I: ::I • • : • ,•,... N., I 1 I i : • : 7 I. re 111 ., 2I! . -1•-•;-: • .1 ! 41,..1 i .iL I 1 i:t! i ; 8 : STABIUZEO . : E 1:1,.,..Fi4-i- 1 : e -, 0. . ' ' lin i•.'• ; i ,. f. ,,, ,‘„,.....--.."-co.tisTRucTioa - ., A= ,•32,. .•:. .Ti ....4: 5 1 .3". : !if;; :i.j i ! ". *--- - be. ENTRANCE ,r, -Alb' 32 , ,•-•,•,,, ,...1 I 1,11":::.: . . . . .--,-. r•-,...3. L.' : [On i.P i 1 .F: : / t limn le '20 tilk 2 §. 212.2010' I, L 4,__,Iiste 5° 51 IS N 1-----..*.M 55 11 _1 S 1/25C.140111(.21. .1.11. to.__ IL 1/2.IL 25.I.al.IlL U. -,g, 1 70 71 72 73 7 75 .., i r PERMIT SET 1 KEY PLAN 76 SC.:ac. 1 - i L owe 07.27.98 J • X51000.0.DWC 9L32 . 1 i g / / ifs, / ..: 2.7 / ,,.../ .../ ..-- ../.." NOTES; ,.... . ,n . ; ,.././A,,,), ;\ ./ .7 , , ,„::;.• ,,, „, ..-- i3 h Icn i 'i 1 ! ........ , - —,/ / 4 / / ---/-7-1-7-7'/'7 !.ZZ 4// // ,,'"/ /(;':'/ir. / i' 0 /I / i.FOR SURVEY CONTROL . INFORMATION,SEE DRAWING G4. _.,--,, <//-./ / // 'i•/-/ // ,'./.3//l 4/ ,,.% / l' ,/:'," „// .1„/ •: i,..I ........................-- ,......, fi t, \ / „ . 8 . I ' ,-.::',..,, /.X.,/ / / / e / / / / ' / • i , / // /I/ •//t7,t( 1 .if r ii 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING C' EID. . / Y . .. . 1 , NOTES AND SYMBOLS, LJ • N...,‘./...,/,/ / / / /, // / /il i ./ , SEE DRAWINGS G3 I , %;•.'„,../ii./..,/ / 4 / %/ // / // / .. s/,Z' / ei / / ,..,,::.:,/ .,..' ,.., ,•••• /•• / • ..0. .' ,, 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOURON/ jts4./ //4 /i" ,..,,1 i it• e':',7 ..-.e. .., SION/ _Z I I • ' + / V 34.,/ / / >k , , , , . z .Av, , / AND TEMPORARY ERO /. /// ,/ / .4,../ ,i Ay ...-- ,, ,,, SEDIMENTATION CONTROL g III It L' (-3 . , ' . • ..• ;, ..., ' /• NOTES,SEE DRAWING i I / I//V / / /r/-7.7-7-.... 4_4,1 / ///,i..",' / 10 i ,' / :•• 5/ TB NOTES/ 9L801. I j I ` „1 • /v /i j ; ,.. ./ „(,•'... .1 •.'j i [NU' ./ EXTENT OF 12'SS V §rEe' •ti C1 / T.--I='UNKNOWN.CONTRACTOR M Z I m i .' • .k / /.-Z ! is : ', : - ... z TO REMOVE ALL 12' .•' • ts : .., V ////;7-/-,./ /.*., -/ 1 /, i l .• , • :e 1/ SEWER SYSTEM WM-INN Z LI p LIMITS OF DEMOUTION, f 0 lz, m I. -I, a N 71.400 I / • /I./ / 4' / / l: // /)4...- '1/4 //// / / ,/ / ,II''i„I. I / / ..,. / N 71,4. PLUG AT LIMITS,AND ; E 0 2 Ld L.1 I 'm /II// /.. it// // .• / ..2 // f erl/ I ' !" // 1- / / \ r's• \\:' ;7 /V/ r: r /a>_./e / / / :.;.. p,::: : 1 .,..:„,/ ...._ ....._.....- RECORD PLUG LOCATIONS. _...... -.......... AREA IS THE SITE OF 09,:r / // 1/ 'L / / V/ / / • , _ ---= MOUSHED RESIDENCE. 1 •i n ,' ,. .. ..... 'i ;\ \tt s'-'t.. -—, . RESIDENCE FOUNDATION, 05 0 I I I i / /„/ >,'t "V / // / / / .;; i: i / / 1/s/ : . •3' "I 1 .;; ; _----:,. : PAVEMENT AND SHIMMING 61(5 „ , ,.: i -.. ! 1 I:: •1!;.-------.-:-.)1,F, ; POOL TO ROAN. REMOVE • • ' I 1 / / /ry Kr / /'$ / // /Vv1/ i; ' i " ,' " , : j k„1 i••; , ;;: : AU.REMAINING CONCRETE, I .I. / /,_/ K.y / / , / // /v /I/. li`;:. i1.4i. . . I , p. :i 1 _.. ... 12 . UTIUTIES AND DEBRIS. I . • • 8, : • 1 / /-..`--2/ // / / // /V/ / ..:1: if,,r:rg-,:iiiiiiiiii.;, FOR DEMOLITION OF • C.Z gl 1 i " • i ; i .: • -',..,:-,:.,.:-1 -_,' ' 24'STORM DRAIN, I • ,.. / /1//V i--.e ---.4../. / /;/ 7:1 li/i I ,; /,;i:f ,./ ;-4 f.1. • I 1 MI . , --, .:-.. SEE DRAWING 1C(D)32 ,.: 0 c, :31 ' i I ', • I I .• : wr RIP-RAP.--/- -.. i-.. I 1 / / // // /)/ / A-27"/A: i '," i : i;I i 31 ' / _,--,EXTENT OF 3"W I ,; ,•i I _,,"UNKNOWN.CONTRACTOR I '''I 1 I / / //1/, f// ,,,, / / // //2: / I i i ;(i i ; I I i I, TO REMOVE ALL 3' i u I:4 In -.E I 1 1 \ i / / / /V. / /i -77-7--/-../:/ : , ;; i I : III;;; i „,„ . . !I • I .1: .\ / / //c/. 7-` ,', / / // /---/ i " ;' il ) r .., / • , ,.., \ „...."PROPOSED Eit , : .• r- IRRIGARON MAIN-7-•\ i• f !I I WATER SYSTEM WHITHIN LIMITS OF DEMOLITION, PLUG AT LIMITS.AND I - :•1 ' I .' RECORD PLUG LOCATIONS. :. . I I ; ,./ / /::A" / // /// // i : '3'; I 3 31:' ! 3_, MI "'. .. . , . • I ; ; I / /X % / / " // / // / ! ! 3 i I ' !, ; ' i ; '. [DIMCWOALSVOVCE kg 1 .. . , •. ... .. . . , i ! ,, • I 1: • : i •• i. ...:,/,...),:.•7 / / / // / / / / : . •: i : : I - i I ':,i \ : I 'i AREA.CONTRACTOR SHALL 1 , 1 i ; I 1 f 1 :1: • •1. \ : .. PREVENT TRANSPORT OF 111 Al., •,, , I: i I : 1 I : ;' . '/ j„3-.,. I i;: A i ,, / 4/ / / 1/ // / / / / 3 i 3p: ;,.•:1 • .: . : POND WATER EL- ' 1 '. SEDIMENT TO EXISTING : .•': 1 DRANAGE SYSTEMS IN I 11,7AM.7/0/96I . I, . • • I !i: I ' / / / / 1,/ // / / / / ! i 3 ;] i i .. i ff; ,. . , i .• - ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFI- : ,1 : CATION 02710. 'i LEARINd UMIT ; i , i I' I I..1, ., . // / / ^/ // / // / . 1 1, I I ..: t. • • . I ...,"...-PENCE CM) : i 1 • I 1 • : COINCIDES WITH 1 I, 1 "g 1 ft I t. , '...../ / / / V / / / / / , ! ,i !: 1, ,; I :% i I i I\ Ii DEMOLITION LI1.41T : :. ••1 "." • : , rl I/_ Z._/ t_/____i_ i__ _••1_ , t 1_ !,_.---_-1.-___wEALAND_tw / w ..1 t l :. 1 1 • I .I PROPOSED STORM " I • . ; : I 1 : i \ 1 1 . DRAINAGE COMBINED \1.( // / / / I I 1, ', i ' 1 I BrXtVIrc' /., / / / / ,,, I \ I WETLAND/DETENTION POND \ I • .1.1/ A/ /5. /1 // / / / I ! Yc,, I, c, ' / .I.I I ;DESIGN'SURFACE ELm6.5 Ifi :: , ------r 2\7i/ / / / /../ / i i z!,,,,..,,r-izz'21-,,s9/ i i t• v... '-. \ \ . .., \i ,.,... , i ,. !,n3p: . •••. , ••.. • II - I';i11••••••---.1 : 1 • za.RCP : • I IF(s)-6.19) i i : " , / / II/ / /11 ..// / / / I g 1 1''. ,-4tk..A--'1;li-,---i:i--ilt.:::.-::;::::,......"1..... !1i i5 lUi 1 • 1 \ , , I, , ,,, , , , , , I , ! : • \ ; %, ,' , , , , , „,, . , . . , : ,,,. , PROPOSECk ', ....'''',. ' . 1 , , , I , , , , , , , ,.,/. ' - UNDERDRAIN -"' :r BCiLMARY !. ••.,. 111‘.I..I .i.±-k'..t.1„ :::::--::.--/,,r"- I I N 2410 , I . A . . \ I I. .., , , f' , ,1, , , ' , ,..,-, ' ''' ; •,. •••, 1 •-•-:, ;. „ ,db,,,,,,,-,;,..,d,,,-_-..\-.....%-::::::‘•:::-.::',..-•-i,;.c.2.6"ii. f, / / / /1 / // /„.e• / . (,..... i:: -•••,. t a ; , i. / / // / 0_,/ /,/ /.... / ' .; -„ PROPOS8D1.24\ ::: •,,,1,, 1 .1'Z'--- - - - - - - ''''.. .:•::-•'^'-'-'' 1 2difla I s i L \ , ! I I i i / / / / / l' / / / / / .. • ... "‹....----;'1 -'.2--411 1 11 /i R4OVE \•• \ •, . . .•\ .N, ••-'-'----•-•-) 11 NIF if ' ; II 1. 1 ; 17'ACACIA . '....t \ '`, :21 1,1 17 lie 2 / ir/ / // // / / /i , IN II 'I.%% \ \ I\ ;71V?.! ••• •••>. ',-,. ,,...1"4,„ , .,/ 1 I ; .. I ‘,7,, •---;3., I . • !!! ! i ..., • • , ,7,' / i-/-..// / // / /// .! -,, : \\ \ \ \';i:\ :-,i ',M.''..VX","s.7-''',,,',.,, -.1.,-, '-, •.,,,,A. 3 1 it /... .„ E .. ,:....,...,,,, - 1 . . '>.. . . . . i . i 6 20 10' 0 1- 20' ao' ' •• -i. : 5 ,,, vimi I If.=‘-=3 55 SWA-14X210.1(.11.4 _—: :", P., N I.1/25C.B,L 2X,RA.10. , ..4 ., „ -cv - __ 71 72 73 7 75 II -- E. KEY PLAN .1 g L cton 07.27.88 J • m • 1 7 r= 4`-'_--'�aitg �: 1 a::. MSIOOO...DWD 9lJ] r 6 1.-•"". ;►.k1 "� I L:� 3 s NOTES %• 1 f L''•"""j �, 1.2 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL y r • T: .,j! INFORMATION,SEE . CD/' /�l •{ I\`•+ IT' SOW•RIM�Il.fiO f� .` •• ,..�� .-} ;� ;��, DRAWINGG4. :t E Z,-RCP(NE)-9.0 A H �l ''l % ~il, j IE 'RCP(9W)_ - i --• ;# • �t • f'�'; 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING cJ �r f .L "�. Poxv+maysFORMER f v s 'A NOTES AND SYMBOLS, ¢w I j ":'t • �`": SEE DRAWINGS C3 ¢O = 7 r .�f f /- -- ..: F AND C4. D. l' �� . i BOUNDARY ! (.`:: a / ! PARKING LOT AREA I 'j f ` i k •�•' 7.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION Z p. ', J �, ! I i f'•' , ! i I •{{ • `-_> AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ i �ggww V ! I 1 �j? ( i �' �' 1 t�_, I. �`'S `'•. SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 4 8 W � I ( - i 2 .•:j • •( • (•,_-�_.� NOTES,SEE DRAWING 0 _ __ `,' !! )], t``1,f11 �`t ! _ ..PW;Ert PaNu 17 r: / _.. r: _a ``•F 49LB 1. HEUSTOP FACILITY(BY w • U \tom'` \ ,; ERMIT ,''Y , -i OTHERS)IS CURRENTLY U¢ 0V t`':II j 1 �A„ ~/"• -r; :( �lJ" • -.j PROCESS.IN CONSTRUCTION P ••-.-. '� • . t,� , ... , ,f .,� }o ~•:;'i. IS PLANNED FOR SEPT A ` 3 ry o.000 �: "" 1 r 11t :-.: N]I•ao0 1998.HEUSTOP FACILITY -I}- 11; , t` I} ::./....--..--.... t• "t.__w 1PROTECTED L Z U p' I �, I I I 1L,, ` �� \ I 'I. ! V .-J,k _ AND TOTO REMAIN. gL 7-O� .."_............................-_..._...._.__.�t t J „ _ . e..I FOR DEMOLITION OF p m _ _..._., :.1 L .... 1 \ N •I i :3` • `J�v DRAWING SEE M- O ..._...-_ .__ .. . j! :i f 2I STORMRAIN _ _ .,._ �0 - 1 11• - PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN f !' I •~ •�"' EXISTING STORM DRAIN y`t; e I:I .,,„%, ©ACE SYSTEM TO BE I�-.-.: is-DUCT IRON ,: I' S :, 8g - ,IE 0-6.15 I I``1' '.` 1 . I i l-` f,'. ©SYSTEMGTO BEELECTRICAL O E KIP-RaP ` ,. 1 L~•• • � E'`. PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN, X U a :I. I, '. I'(\ • .�11 I -POND _ 1(-` !.1., • /1 l `` 1.-„/ •1 i .:A� Z�Cp QUIT�/• :( +• d tA�, WAS]AM,>�9;. :j r"- `17 t , �\ `� ti (NO VD) %-''•}S: Y .• .CONTRIX. STORM I Lt r ;i f •- I. I ,i 'Z • _ _ 1,..........1 �i 51RUCNHE I' I i 1 <G' • A •{ I` • I iRASN GRA E TOP EL IJ IP , ?• `\ _ 8:I :�_ 4p9__—_1 RIM=rr:2 E _ 1 1 _ —ti, CLEARINC_LIMIT •: :_ _} 9 7 '� rE z4•RCP(E) 9s i I `i I �� I FENCE u{�i— : y ,, _—_— Y (IE c'PVC(� a]I, ! i!i ; ! . .�. iT I 9:1 Zvi v 7 T _ cOINCID S YUN I ��_ { -» s .i;j 1,/' .'/ i i '� DENOUTION UNIT /• ..J ! -...���4 L:_:.d 4.1 [yy[S 9Y +( RIP-RAP I T •`f RIM 15.15 ! i•:1 • l,�o.`. i Y ' I� 3.� �.1/t ! j IE 34'RCP(N)-6.]6 II 7 -.�..._—.. . ]I <• ~{ • f,':' _ _ J i I: IE 34'RP(E =6.l] 1 1 t' i. 1 � .,. + _,„.........-.... s......i.s.!....,-.......-........,. (`-hY. r:S.%_I v'•�x_J-rt _—..__...._._'._0__'__—O._.. ..}•2.0.-•R_...._.. • �jAC iB f CONSTRUCTION , � `( + l ,`EDGE OF PAEI/ENT t `'�_�� _ {i:'>� \ M - � 1-- r � �� �� �o SLRVEYED ON NNE 1998 ." Rb a 16.89 • _ r�. �/(l lif.LL/ -` IE PR (:.9.o w \w •Rf .. . I \: 20'2 AD'a Q GI. E 11 Rc 9= • s� � M>MA ILIA N / - - ®m g _ _1 PERMIT SET %P� 5 z L WN,E:07.27.913 J ,.0,...014002\2200\05100113.OWG 7 ^°'>.,KL/7.7sa ^0 SOY' Iw Wort•O w a W.1Of•0c. m m r""'q �As SHORT( ���'I A BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �03.04.98 _� CITY OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT — �� ®1 RENTON _ I''7, Pbnninaa//R�:wnoiP,��b Wo,.,o�Pt. DEMOLITION do TESL PLAN 9134 NO. REVISION BY DAIS APPR — Oregq zet RE,AEmin,t,o'l GRID 34 `m' 1 I J. alj • • A•. I I J I' , I Et53,500 i I E 53.000 I+ ...... ..::q}. ....... :.......• ...1...�: s r;ai ' ..�.tr........ic�i E3� cc».....-,-,-1--,-.- ....»...aq-:1:--`-''Tl• hi • Pr: I I >. f' • 3 : : , y '...S..'...S. 6 ! I 1 ' L — c. 3. FI; Id I: • • .., ., . tl • • {;54,000 • ii :•1 !Y E Sq,C00 ( ..:. I •. J i• ' ,', "_fFICBOHNGWci4N:-Goid PA50' :N•-•.-- ••• ••...P :::•o En On3 •1t Op OAKSOALE AVE,S.W.(BY OTHERS) t Lt^ OAKSOALE AVE.S.W. (BY OTHER 4..........-._._............._........._._...! I : ...- • 55_— cz .-- THE BOEING CO.THE BOEING COMPANY %� •— j —' ------10A"METRO SS--- i SS I2.B . ...- q,,, i , I i 1 I Z--a I . i i�i ! • t •_-.... _ - O m C 9 yty-- g—.-...... fig-- A ! n a__ ARt, m VI o .1 '• I ._Iz co , N _ 4 • •s z`~' .18 I,. I .. -�! - g or,, o ofo no:.,moogp !ili I!i g.1' - 2f9 —1 c, .e.' r 6 ogs -0No o8TR Aran 74 Fo2i > $ mo S - n_ ,n o „ S ,, S ,f.n "U :�o • I aizobx Amsly ;,o n0NC f n3 fl =9 4' moo ioi �zz � z 7 \ G 1 1 ,nls % `'\ } !y -� '\': `?:„-- _.� - `"" �1�\r�—� .♦ \.♦ L,., \ _ NOTES' rstoat,..owc sus �b��I��I c:r \ '; :.1.A• .. �. ^.`�iii;;. ',)o w Y-•�~• I'''- ...,....,.. `� \♦ `•;;., j It I W 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL \y,,..7 ,,,g;i t::; ` , \ ♦ `++� `;;` Im,i , INFORMATION.SEE e \ ri\; <:,• _ `,.\ ,J•+ • \ \, \th �.`' �\ ._( t DRAWING Ga. 9 U \. ,+i''✓� _ `\`• `• ~ v \ ♦ +\;�\., '�+•. ♦k ?`,`. :'I t t 2.FOR NOTES AND DRAWING \♦1 SYMBOLS, AND G4. Y w `�- ! \`::;- ` \` + \ kr •a '••I SEE DRAWINGS C3 A `:`?.,, + ; o 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION g UZ 13. IPRDPOSCOe;`�:'• ,..;t.';<:,• ``T6. ,+•\• �; -s. -+ t+•' a,\ �' i �I,, AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ y 8g l,_w U 4 STOR ARAIII.\,.:•:, `\ S,°' \ \'• \ •i'{•. U SEDIMEATION CONOL ;y` • REPIAC�FIEN � : ♦ \ ; NOTES SEE DRAWING / • 41 . \` NEB.IC LIMIT 't :lit t ,�•'\ AGE STSfLMS TO BE C�.7 //,.•/ _ ♦•\'\' ``. `' \\. i� \'•.•_ 1�,�\ '',) +`♦ 'i • L'\ ' PROTECTED AND TO REMAIN. Otr a /;f' \\ ``\.�. •; .1 , \i+' ;i ` + �. `i• ` tt i :: i; - CONSTRUCTION HAUL S J¢ J rc'St;tao -'•'� '•: ,,` + m t �` `' 1 1 1 (. it N)I.ann ROUTES NOT SHOWN. yL 213 S / ,y- .. \. ,, •%Ai.: ,'I' 1. t \ :1 i I ;. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT y aU z w w `''''' ♦ '+ •EMNO'1l" 5¢,; ljy, i 11' � TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT d i Z_w C.-i) C' r'- ^''\ \`$C :,_: ♦NDARY', a'•` : It ' I`•; AND DEBRIS BEYOND PROJECT L O li "• �••':`+. +•'-:' _ i;;'� : 'I i I' l •I 1.' LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH I 11 U m S .. \ \�l\� `� '1.7 :'1 ','1. : ,i SPECIFICATION 02710. • �♦ `\ .,. .. ,1 i 1 I. 0 t, t, I]M N'IMIZE TDISTURBANCE /'` ` `• 1 .1 i : i : /AND VEGETAT VEGETATION REMOVAL N AREA'OFING i i..:+.,t S 1 $� / _ s `•♦ `s_��._.._:_ 1 1.—I j +`,�'Cr /:• FORMER PRACTICE TRACK CT.Z ➢:_ +'\ \ ,=• F 1 p, j 1. /'�� INFIELD. M. OF 9E %r TO REMAIN f \ + •'•k G _-- - —. ,_ I ./ . t :/ // a i C.J c4 a. -^�' +"I _ `\` \ 1r`"\_- Ili F ) .:� _ (,,' f 1 , } sl i • '; f I 1'' ,1 pi ▪ i; •t 1•; i• • lI, I, 1 .'I, 1•1t t, ,. 1•'1` ( ,, I!I!'i',i t+ I'h AO •• t , ; r• I 1 3 / , 1 `, j • DQuN 4Y-•K','i 0 . • l 'l I 'k I1 ;i V I , �I R I _ ....�._1z.... t •• ;;, j '• it '`::\.`�: ��♦ �\ i I' I ( ( i I �I 1 i.`\ -.o .♦ ‘.. ----............ I [ I \ ., 3 e n /• 1 11I j Li + iCii , , l is • iAL1,. I•, i r. i : j / j II t.t. :: tl, iN I• - v ,. +r �I 15 / ( 1., li :• ., I /i I wr. 11( iiti n z 111! • I. ./ • - 1 t 1. •-•11 1 1. i \▪ ir .:, „ ,:!::; t / • I :: ( 22 23 . 5 :___...„.„_:„...,„:„:„".. , , o I A f I s1i; i .. y 20 � �—� — 2�� , so.� �A3 5 55 8 N LI/},$SL?x,R IL ,., 6 63 65 j jA ) 6tl 6 )0 — _-- --_ ____—_---___ _ ) 72 73 )_ 75_-- r PERMIT SET I KFPAN z L 0.,07.27.88 J .I • -1 `..I'.... %5100045.DWG 9Ll] J F Oi I ! ' , 1 / / / / / ,// / "' o ::: \ i'�, . NOTES i E 1 h @ i i h `•\ / / / f'/ /// / ///\ ,�,';-'� 1 lam-``• '`-•,\ 1.FOR SURVEY CONTROL tt ! 1j t c•'• ION,SEE 1 :I ,' W ,:,y/ / / / �''./ / /:� /';� •`l .W`.1''. �. DRAWING G4. e I _ / / / /A l/ / / / / t'1 PROPOSED LAKE'.•,1 \ ,• 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING 9 " 'I __ _ PROPOSED STORM '' � AERATION/RECIRCULATX)N• t• -��ND�I.• -�.` NOTES AND SYMBOLS, w !':; " " / / /,. / /.,/ / / / v' \ x� fA DRAINAGE COMBINED I r S STEM •.' '• _ SEE DRAWINGS G3 p - f I; •iI WETPOND/DETENTION POND �\ ' / / / %r/ / / / /\ ''•` 1 , RUUItkk1-RY 3- AND G4. p W a ` t 'i DESIGN SURFACE EL=8.5 C\/// p.// / / / / / \ •vv v\%'��\,, • O„L,[ 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION jQ mod' F I ../i ! t t e'�smKVARY ` C yaag 1�w ! 'l REMOVE ALL TREES WITHINA,..'// / / / / / / \ \ ` • SEDIMENTATION CONTROL C l''a`L, in ! DEMOLITION UMIT(TYP) /+• / •.% y / / / / / / /• �' t�/d° y - a'\, \_ -.-,PREVENTNTRACTOR TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN E 9•0 S t 1 `f -!(:) "1f �.• m \• `• ```-,�\ ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFI- L U z w w u i ri _ 170N 02710. 6 r J J s> C T ) lotltl •_ LVEar ! \_ MD CONCRETE W LL $TABIGXD �-�i^ _ -_.._N B• C � ;:., ..J _ CIILVERTvv a 'I, \,. ` l I • £CON$TR T1ON /`•, 9'PO 1 - ��/��/ // I' IE 1�•CMP(SW) 10.9fi • g^ _.- t / ii 19, ¢12---P.(SW)-122. _ _ _ - rtpNO �%_/-..- .�V: ; \v Cs.z II ) I` / ••• / / %'/ / i •• .,• N 71,000 re OD s°Y �.... - • I i t-.,/ /+ _ e. �:• / /// / / / s. J ;l •o�_e°Lr• =7' s:Pv4-._•-`(:', _._ - .� ♦/ , / / / / / a `€ VLX. ' :e 6[1i• ?�... + ^ t.,:.-'. _ ^- �I. \i.4 / / / / UNDERDRAIN � PROPOSED 7 d L't r'6'"-) ''-' ( PROPOSED _.............. 1.♦ / / 1\ \ .�el,E-,-, < , i STORM DRARy __ __- \ / / / / / / G 71 0 j� ! CL NRIN � 1 _ ._...^ / / / / / VG UMIT:: 1 \COINCIDES W(THT:, ! ;='�I�I, I'J `r ( DEMOLITION IT.414 1. !, I ' t • II • ir'\ f1 1 • +i 1 _ cuLVEl" _ _�S _ ___,t +_ _\ _— PROPOSEDG IN ; �•/ i3liit t ( 11 IRRIG4TION MAIi- I •'�' \ 1 — ! J •ROPOSED 48' yg 3 ', •• ` i 0 CULVERT u I i51jI ;I: t,l i c all( /i 5 S fi .• T '� t j ♦ ♦ /!� STABILIZED 9 @ 1 I T'• f ; I, . , • `v4. _ _. ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION a •~K''i 1`l •1 ,' 'll SILT FENCE/CLEARING y„'" ♦ ♦ •....--.... - - 3 g I .� �M1t •\ LIMIT FENCE TYP 4'__ B'INN DIP • .1 ,... / ''',,. ', ' •.--1 , ,', '', ', COINCIDES WITh I K' { % l , \1• 1 ', i DEYOURON UN ! r �!~1I \, t-mil/___ ♦ ♦ „.., , Q:= ' '' 1 '., ' ' 1' 1J ttl iiir z. I\ (V n v �5 0 N JO,tl00 tl 1 1 •, \• _ •I ,1 "' t, :. ,• N]O,tlCO L 5MEi•7 gi5 STIV • so' to' 0 20' 40• ;: � 5u55 i 1/2.5MC M-C tx.1:4.ail .. . , ' ` N aI/19Lti[7J,ttail . 6• 68 6 JO r PERMIT SET 1 KEY PLAN z - L. cum 07.27.98 J m _ _ %5f 00046.OWC 908 a J o 0 @ hSEE CONTROL INFORMA w :.....__._..I w .....__.._..'. ' NOR SURVEY Il ' ": � x u _-..".-.--... • ��`♦� M 1 : 1.DRAWING T1G4. _..........:............... . .....e - . : _ - ,_ _ \ ' ������ 1 `t Irovsr,aox w,•^.• 2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING CC oU \�6'coNsraucnoN , 4 ::: ,: SEENOTEDRAW DRS AND AWINGS SYMBOLS,3 rcvcE _ i '-i' (No 1.1,0) AND Go- w2 d I •�•�•�♦ j (.; 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION ,������ , AND TEMPORARY EROSION/ EXISTING ROAD TO BE ' SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Ow to '••�. REMOVED BY OTHERS 5 ���� ✓' NOTES,SEE DRAWING D .b p 'S.'. ♦♦♦ HEUSTOP FACILITY(BY w2 • • �"U fY ".;, _ _ :�♦�®•� I B.45C w -1 ®OTHERS)IS CURRENTLY C0 O O - i:��♦:♦:♦ .-• Pair '��.j • PROCESS11. IN .DESIGN/PERMIT O - REMOVE ALL TREES WITHIN �.��♦♦ 1u� - _ '-,d;'j IS PLANNED FOR SEPT L 3 p _ DEMOUTION OMITS(TYP) f ♦♦♦ -:--3 1998.HELISTOP FACILITY ♦♦♦4 IS TO BE PROTECTED . I. U O _ _ : :♦�♦:♦1 ' AND TO REMAIN. �'-m¢ __.'•1 : : �`a v. EXISTING�AND COMMUNICATIONS ----I<. --- . 6'CONSIRUC RON ®0 ut -_ •`, FENCE I ♦:♦:♦:. I 1 _ SYSTEMS TO BE PRO- ♦♦♦.'.1 0 • TECTED AND TO REMAIN. _ • J. . CONSTRUCTION• ©ROUTES NOT SHOWN. a -O - ,'� 1. ♦♦♦♦♦♦� 1 '_ jt CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT a;•_. _ ( 8� N a,,aoo • ♦♦♦♦♦♦� _ _ _ ry v,, a TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT a z .C§ ETLAND I' F, ♦♦♦♦ 1 _ -- ---- _ 00 AND Op E •,.•, �� ♦♦♦1 'I LIMITS INRACCORDANCE WITH E >-'Z ay !♦♦♦♦♦♦. 1 _ ---_ - --_--, SPECIFICATION 02710. �Es7 n1.1 \ `•,y PROPOSED UNOERDRAIN ♦♦♦♦♦� 'I RRlca non CONTROL 946CC cy 1: • rp;y v E I: u4nc ap E i fr,, .rn . ....•.., ..• ... . ,.. \-...• .....• %:::::::„ .....yia,- , ..e..A. 4.,,,,,,,,,,,4,. ................::::::::::—..--.-.. • 1 _ •. ::.:>.. 1t • tl CONSTRUCTION _ .. .. _. _ - �..:....-_.. ....-.r._ papi •.. 1`''•. '' ,•t ENTRANCE �-. ......._ ' 9L .t. y* LI 111f 1111 M 1 •I L. • 6 CONS'MICRON ( ,, :. �pP SILT FENCE/CLEARING I 1,`i 'L j CLEARING UNIT I• • @ UMIT FENCE(TYP) - FENCE(TYP) r '© ..\ I COINCIDES WITH '\ '� -""". t COINCIDES WITH �' DEMOLITION UMR '±, _ -j _' DEMOUTION UMR, _ --5 —- - --5--"- ----D - - -- - ---� - 'y---—------ .;,; ---- WETLAND"I^t:;—,`i --- ---''�. -- ---N------- ----- - --r - ----- _.- _ am`. r FIIIIIISM • • --It:. j as - -- - - �'*:1`I ` ''i' 1,' `.=K,• __ ••■8 �'f• •xx /, fl • 1(• `,73 I '�a66 ii7 ITrlA.v_ iia ' .. /, . 20' 10' ZO' 40' I iwY31i1 IM 4 '----� �wC-rs ��1� 50 • x Ix - I �L.�y '` �y ?Mal L'' GO 55 pS 1�L .2I�� R ,i� 6J 6 65 N l @/�SEC!i I.23.E I.Lk f• fin I �r 7s-r--7s-- o r PERMIT SET , K PLAN i L _ am.07.27.88 J "....014002\2200\05100115.DWG w:OM K47.6.9B w:w.• :w vc.v w .w..:afm m. ej w-mao I wrne �"�6NowH ,�,,,-,w, n �BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK '" CITY OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT .......... sa ._ At\ iws RENTON DEMOLITION & TESC PLAN C 1 o® I I.,,.,d-I regg1oS/rnemton PL. WmYa troto 9L39 NO. REVISION BY DATE APR ..ee Id®• Creoq Zimme000n P.E,Mmintatrotor GRID 39 'm I I' Ix z • . i • L. • .: — 1 .. • • 1 - i I L ci t i— W.T. . B I ':E 51.800 I —7-1 • i. E 53.800 F • ;' : 6 , d ; —'S :::::..::...:.::::.::::.:.:.:.... • r^ ASPHALT n I• _._.. tt. • m i I S' , • A I -n • ..: • ... a 1 '1 C- ji • E Sa,OCo \ • ( - ? E 5..0CG( ; • 1 1 .. .............. .._.-._.--THE BOEING CO. •: •:: '..Y4 OAK D AVE.S.W.(BY OTHERS) •' I >:Q o� OAKSDS.W.;(BY ALE AVE.S. OTHERS) •__—_.... ..............— G L.A__.. "7HE BOEINC CO. .-.._.-. / J! _ _... - i ING COMPANY 7. i i i _._ ,ice,'i [ A [© i i [ i—.•��i T -z—� N — V r %" .=' 1. __ - •� — .....— .._. ..is .• .)___.... — ® mI i....— e. .... —II of -+ : ,\\' e R0 . [ a LJ ( r _� of, ii o .o S Os Pmosyvi2 2�9 A I . 1f9.�i� Amon oc— Uou• _ ,n o rn - = o mA =�n y r Z I� r n I !z ^..`^014002\2zop\X5100116.owc ..... m eYYI'dPY' P psi'av�,•xc I 1 �"'""`�O1p —" CITY OFI BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK s" 74� SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ._ RENTON I ,,yo., I CAN,.' PI e••rg�a,a,,/P„wx Works Dept. DEMOLITION k TESC PLAN 9L40 NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR ^� 1 d� `:/ 'egg I e P.E.Administrator GRID 40 'm ' , o I / I I. / ,F f .. • 'I /r i' O tl V • ' • E'S4,a00-:,.5\ry f.• pC v -' Ao- 4`` — A E Sa,40U' • L _ I n" G- IE I—�k�x I ::: II i1 I '' I . I • 1 .. ``Th'• •,--z—ir...— I rn /ar "0I i ;o b ogi DeX V V m (*IPP mm , j-1I pP a mo E s<,e0o g 01E s<,ecO L I I, _ 6iljzmooA gmA fAo oz -_ . = po �yv$ ?zQ iiitt k Li. m,l<. -T 4I m_ _16 m A g. E8m3 °b mz —1 S U 6.4, z F£ p_z p pm \ . I 05100517.DWG 9La4 3 v° ` _ I.I I I '� NOTES; • 1t1,FOR SURVEY CONTROL t 12 I h _ 11 ,tt.- /,•' I �� N I 1•t}:) \,1\ .,, 6. INFORMATION DRAWING SEE O•. 9 M - II It " \ • ;,2.FOR GENERAL DRAWING _`ti I \ 55t / i' CITY OF RENTON STORM UNDFRDRAIN J '- t r I I NOTES AND SYMBOLS, S. �O fiS f-."`.:_ i �, b` `. ,. :-RIGHT-OF-K' ___ _ I'1 ,,,i \ AND DRAWINGS G4 a d 1 I`� a I ......__ '.�. � _'_... ^-... ...__-... 1 / I I� + ``\ 3.FOR GENERAL DEMOLITION w 1 I•, i 3 �.. !...16.._........: : I I • ,•k•.`\ AND TEMPORARY EROSION g�Z a IE_ �' I I '_ / p 8 w w U - _...._.... CONTROL _ SEDIMENTATION 1 I wEMNO'r\ifli NOTES,SEE DRAWING Q Sa O� -- -- t . I BOUNDARY-1. 9LB01, :I: B--NQ L. I I EXISTINGKING CO 4�U2 �p 1; • i• - Y I; I li ••I ID'SEWER TO BE PRONTY Et Z -. --- TECTED AND TO REMAIN. •.. +` p O� .... i-I I ICI' I •' + \, EXISTING PUGET SOUND w< : " 0I' ENERGY OVERHEAD L 03 3 •.1 . -^ O., i...._..._.... �" POWER SYSTEM TO BE p 'U 2w w I : ,'-J-..' •„-• .-_ .-...._..-.. : PROTECTED AN TO REMAIN. I SI • _ ..--_'.........._..I .I 3 :N I I •` !: ©CONSTRUCTION HAUL 'm `- :- t u /1 ROUTES NOT SHOWN. —' & CLEARING LIMIT �- - I CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT s> N '� . WATER V, .s - FENCE(TT) U V_AULi.1 •� 8I.4 ,a1' I I - 0. . tl , TAND RANSPORT OF SEDIMENT OEBRS BEYOND PROJECT fp ....._. -I::� ._....._...--_.- w I ( w LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH y - •'•� +, SPECIFICATION 02710. , 1 v wz �_ .j I� l G o I ," eE ' ' • Fw I 1 �. I ; : VEIOETATION AREA'-__ .._. • :1 ..,........".. VEGETATION AREA II •couNii _ y CJ�' € vEGETAnON AREA I11 11 I• f 'EWEO EASEMENT g ne �E 1 • • 1 63 V\ 1 \\ ,t1 . I , ...... ... - v; c�, -.. a c . t j .. 4 11 i! \_, �....- a,, i =I .r - a • i 1 R • _ _ a l ,-...._.. ! 1 i 3 f.. it ;� � •'• .- .._._ 'EtNG _ is_ 1 II !MH I -):SHE i i .?t� 5 :..''i ," :: _-.......-__.... = — i • _ ...CB,I -/. %-Y•: '� y •/ SET MAIN PT B"12 `' _ �,� ], �. 5 N 11-01 1 -11 _ / / ELEV= 17.01 _ I - I� to s. a �I /. �m,E NE j• N 70466.G27fi7 ASPHALT I I •� t`Ili ]3 FH ,:!2 1 E�.. O of (Ti _ P.1PEVi... 7.abYSJ 'Tim s i :1 O � � — �' W.4:-`� B -SAE ... - 3 _ -.-. .__............ ;.-----a; �W ..�:�-,. 60 / I i C8 u I I I I •I w - ®El � 96 El le" 9 20' 10'_Q 20' 40' e a 71111/4, G 5 ,r2, L r N Ill �I. RC It 10 ,. • ce c 70 _______ r PERMIT SET 1 KEY.PLAN 3 z w,c:07.27.98 J .....014002\220\X5100118.DWG e r... BYYP+PY' gtlMw, I L. C 15�e1 55]-Ed00 e ®."'�P1 IAS SHOWN �` A CITY OF BOEING LONGACRES OFFICE PARK �"m.asa ' I ,•�� =`.` RENTON SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ' vmn v D uao/c k ne Deno. DEMOUTION & TESC PLAN 9145 Gregg Zimmerman PC,ACminfatrat r N0. REVISION i BY DALE APPR •'® a"®� GRID 45 ...„ ram. r— i ,, ' I ' r° / /. AS I , / r// F `ii,• A I ?r it j vi ,,:g m 1 I I tr r /' /�o Ao f o ti I I a I / C C V ram, `, 1 I r iI ! CI, CV' ( ( o v ,I I Ii i . i I, I : I ?r :I :I :r, r't t A!,, , t .t I ' .i, I ! "1 ttt ',I.I�1.tt!t :1 't : 1 I iI • • '1\ \ +.\+-\ E 54,e00 '?�':?'t .t ,t •.:,, \`• �C� E s+.aoo� n I l L.. t, 1 i 1 i E 54.600 !' I E 54,600 • • :. f ' II 1 i 1 ! '�I .t: is �z • I r1 t i 1 r.r I -al SA I 10 1 03 : m m I. II ` I o I E 5<,500 E Sa,500 • I = gRU mm0 m6oA m0A 0-o I7, ,w.�iW ��1 6 yz o,, II'i1I{,' pooio •Z�OK �!Am Ht) no>Nn i�� "'� �<3 r�rFny g�2 pg2 na )u■�� $=qg rm 04 m04 may$ '4<<1 02 4 ... Tirg Q I 0,1A g ' Fo y 41 ml -I — ,n - -r I 2O-A,qF Cr'S OW,ly r-R 0 0 0\•-\JI" =IU o "� I . j _ __ L i / ' I 0 LEGEND LI — N I ° r z UPLAND/BUFFER—(ELEV. 11.0+) I ; VEGETATED WETLAND—(ELEV. 5.5-1 1 0)BLDG. 25-01 O ,_ BLDG. 25-20 II OPEN WATER—(ELEV. 2.0-5.5) =� — �J ---- WETLAND RESERVE AREA 0 _ —-— STORMWATER TREATMENT POND --- WETLAND MITIGATION AREA A WETLAND / MITIGATION NOTE: ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION L .. ... 1 ^ WILL BE PLANTED AS SHOWN, OR HYDROSEEDED (SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR HYDROSEEDED AREAS). e' `�\' ...r % �/ � WETLAND . . .... ` ` RESERVE Fyn J *.IiiiiP'zlN —... TORMWATER C TREATMENT POND CSTC LANDSCAPE O% ❖. EXISTING s>, "s �r, ..:......,,,.. / // .... .....%— / MAIN POND �::;: ,% :::::::::.:::::;: : :/ .„,•„„,„„„,„„„„„ .„ „.„„.„„„„ . .. „....... .0: 5. ,.................. /i;% ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, I4 , //"'�i 2. /� BRUCEAL o lo' IQ' 210• /� \ DEESk cPAwxc "''9 ASSOCIATES , / \ �. ma - n -.m d. a.. MG= a PM. ua A«FPfAallnY i�s01 011M am Md.e,b ..�e LANDSCAPE PLAN -- BOE7A' "`mzi 071396 SURFACE WATER d„ 1 z. MANAGEMENT PROJECT 979191-09 mr tlYI.WSIER IONGAPRS ORICE PARK m� 25.YD- ';; [D UPLAND/WEIIAND - VEGETATED WETLANDS a OPEN WATER _a_ VEGETATED WERAN05 9 UPLAND ED EA DUFFER(20 Y1N.) (ELEV.11.0-5.0) ((1EV.5.5-2.0) (ELEV.5A- 11.0) BUFFER 2SMIN.} (Pro)1 �PALUSTRWE FORESTED(PFO) II (ELEV. 10.0- 11.0) -(P55)a (PEYJ 2 (PAB) PALUSOLNE ADWTIG(PAD) 2_ PALUSTRINE EMERGENT(PEN) 2 PAL.SCRUB SFWU8(PSS)- �( (ELEV.33-&0) (ELEV.eA-9.5) (ELEV.9.5- 10.5) "arK ey, i 5 1 f„/ i 5 af",v 0 4.1 5 c„,c1 74: 1'ITer 4...../:,_ et �, a w a w 25 20 20 13 EIOSONC GRADE • J - IS ..........::.:.:... STAM-tATER-LEKLe.]. • y ...__ -POND-BOTfOY ELEK.2.0:—� - _ _—..• -5 -5 OCROSS SECTION aaw.c 0 TW1icr E 20 Si ILII SCAM:0 ffi a r a No11QOITA.MAIL BRUCEMk DEES& ASSOCIATES ACCUTABUTY in,;o1 .11A an.a awn rea. roi. ••••sv __ n num -- n® n w� urt ,A ,�®, LANDSCAPE CROSS SECTION _ �d,n„"0A,ulom ,, 07,13. -- — -- Qi BOE//VGm SURFACE WATER o. i�� MANAGEMENT PROJECT a 9T9121 CML MASTER Lemmas OFFICE PARK‘"°n 25.1D- = \ *•\\=, • 1-4 05 • • __< --a. „.. - oc-_-- -:--- --1, • . - W 1 6TH STREET_ _•••-:::: .---,, IIENi,-----1 0") ".- r-- ------ -----z"7-J --....j S.W. 1 9TH ST oi, -- ,:,-„-w-,:...,:,•• • .15g 1-1 1.11 ..of --'- 4-4..- ONSTR I S., 7.A.INRA 1 CITY OF CITY OF 1,1 °.5' . RENTON TORY/ILA 0 . elf: S.W.23RD ST. 0 . ® I S W !7TH STREET BOE co IN D::::' 1-11 m 1 p.1.02, 4 • ___ __ __ r-ri c_r) * © © (J) E —I 'Q 1 ),..--,. - 1 < = f I" V >• g I" 1 • 2 g 2 D> g —< i !5 < Erl Q z n A g • Si - C :.---- - 11 1 Ncm..r.43p9; I 25230 -9006-05 ' 139999 MEL OD STUART 213 LAKE ST_SOUTH 98033 ;CIR, LAND WA . 1 2523 ,4-9024-03 201303 . 0 R R C NAV CO v UNION PACIFIC RR CGRP PI BOX 2500 Br OOM'F IELD CO I 80020 52. 04-9037-08 647777 C TY OF SEATTLE WATER DEPT CIUNTY CITY BLDG 252;04-9058-02 K _CH HANS GEORGE 190139 T ALLPAK CO',NTAINER 1100 SW 27TH ST 98055 ENTON WA - 33 040-5300-01 ' ENAROYA CAPITAL COMPANY L.699999 001 4TH AVE V4700 i 98154 SEATTLE WA l 000580-0036-06 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/E1LEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 90868 98009 BELLEVUE WA . �3 4040-6120-07 541786 BITNEY-GROUWS CO i 108 FACTORY AVE N ',11 98055 R EN WA 1 I 24230 -9020-08 DRR LTD PARTNERSHIP 859999 200 S BROAD ST 6 FLR PHI ADELPHIA PA 19102 24230 -9028-00 BUR INGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT 11701 E GOLF RD 4400 60173 24230 -9034-02 , • UK ILA CITY OF 879700 • 630 , SOUTHCENTER BLVD 4100 TUK ILA WA 98188 2430 -9037-09 1SCH[BER INC j 610198 140+ MONSTER RD SW REN ON ' WA 98055 24230 .-9054-07�.1 -__ THE BRIDGE GROUP 461302 164 3 SE 35TH' ST BEL EVUE WA 98008 24230 -9056-05 LON ACRES JOINT VENTURE 8N3581 . 921 MIDDLE FORK RD • ONALASKA WA 98570 24230 -9086-09i, PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX 'DEPT PO BOX 90868 I BE LEVUE WA ' 98009 242304-9115-04 HUNTER DOUGLAS REAL PRO1PERT719999 2 PARK WAY RT 173 UPPER SADDLE RVR NY 07458 , 242304-9123-09 ' PU ET WESTERN INC 529800 19715 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 310 80 HELL WA 98011 2423+4-9129-08 ! DRAINAGE DIST 1 597777 60• WEST GOWE ST • KE T WA 98032 • 2L23+4-9132-03 PI :RRE JAMES43 715432 PO BOX 27069 SEATTLE WA 98125 1 rill II 1 I. 1 6 . Doll 0---------4---- 1 I 1 8 - i til ___....... ,., 1 ., 14,14 1 1 T ----DI i 1 1 i , ui.i.,_ 1 1 I ! . U Aci• • Perkins Cie 1zo1 Third Avenu Suite 4800 Laura Neebling Whitaker Seattle,W 1981o1-3og9 PHONE:(206)359-8584 PHONE:z 6.359.8000 FAX: (206)359-9584 • FAX:206.359.9000 EMAIL: LWhitaker@perkinscoie.com www.pe kinscoie.com April 16, 20'09 Mr. Alex Pietsch Administrator City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Longacres Office Park Entitlements Dear Alex: As you know, we represent,The Boeing Company with respect to Longacres Office Park • ("LOP") land use matters. You recently requested Boeing's analysis of the status of LOP entitlements'. I write on Boeing's behalf to present our summary of the series of land use permits and other approvals obtained for LOP redevelopment over the last 15 years, including a discussion of underlying State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review and the status of vested LOP development rights. Section I of this letter summarizes the history of LOP land use planning and entitlement since Boeing's purchase of Longacres Racetrack in 1990. Section II lists LOP land use permits and approvals issued by the City and other relevant agencies since 1994. Section III addresses the status of LOP vesting and associated environmental review. Section I: Background LOP consist of approximately 158 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Interstate 405 and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad right of way in the City of Renton. Boeing's Customer Service Training Center ("CSTC")occupies an adjacent 48-acre site to the north and east of LOP. LOP is located entirely within the Commercial Office ("CO") zoning district and is designated Employment Center-Valley by the City's Comprehensive Plan. A master site plan for conversion of LOP from racetrack use to 2.5 million square feet of office and light industrial uses ("LOP'Site Plan") was developed by Boeing in the early 1990's. Based on a 20-year,planning horizon, the Site Plan included commercial building development located 03003-0104/LEGAL 15689674.1 4/16/09 I i ANCHORAGE • BEIJING BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO • DENVER • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK • PHOENIX • PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie LLP and Affiliates • 1 Mr. Alex Pietsch April 16, 2009 Page 2 I ' throughout the 158-acre site'. The Site Plan assumed that approximately 65 percent of LOP site area would be impervious surface (i.e., buildings, parking areas or parking structures, and roadways) and approximately 35 percent would be dedicated to an expansive stormwater detention system and associated landscaping and open space. Environmental analysis of IJOP redevelopment under the Site Plan was conducted in 1993 and 1994 by the City pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA"). A Draft Environmental Impact Statement("DEIS") for the LOP Site Plan was issued in August, 1994; the Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS") was issued in March, 1995. Based on its review of the,Site Plan and supported by corresponding SEPA analysis, the City issued a SEPA Mitigation Document in May of 1995 requiring mitigation of development impacts associated with LOP redevelopment. Between 1997 and 1999 Boeing developed three projects on the LOP property based on the Site Plan: the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group headquarter office building, the Boeing Family Care Center;"and a surface water management project designed to provide detention for full build out of Site Plan development, including a central water feature/wetland enhancement/detention pond. In addition to local permits, the surface water management project required a Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army corps of Engineers and 401 certification by the Washington Department of Ecology. In 2000, Boeing worked with the City to increase the development capacity of the LOP Site Plan by 500,000 square feet and to negotiate a Development Agreement to vest LOP development to City regulations applicable as of December 2000. Additional SEPA review was conducted in 2000 to support these action's in the form of an expanded SEPA Checklist(including traffic and stormwater analyses supplernenting the 1994 EIS), resulting in the City's issuance of an SEPA Addendum to the FEIS dated May 14, 2002. By 2002, Boeing's plans fort LOP had changed. The company no longer planned to build out the balance of the LOP site for Boeing purposes, and therefore elected to parcelize the site for potential disposition. Boeing obtained LOP Binding Site Plan approval, in conjunction with an updated Development Agreement(which reflected the new Binding Site Plan but continued year 2000 vesting), in December 2002. SEPA review for the 2002 Development Agreement was conducted in the form of a SEPA Addendum approved by the City's Environmental Review Committee is May of 2002,Which concluded that previous SEPA review conducted in 1994, 1995 and 2000 adequately analyzed the Agreement's environmental impacts. Since approval of the Binding Site Plan, several lots have been sold for redevelopment by others—the Federal Reserve and Bank of America. Remaining LOP parcels south of S.W. 27th Street, as extended, continue to be actively marketed. 03003-0104/LEGAL 15689674.1 4/16/09 Mr. Alex Pietsch April 16, 2009 Page 3 Section II: LOP Land Use Permits and Approvals • 1994—Draft Environmental Impact Statement for LOP: examined impacts of 2.7 million sq ft of commercial/light in kustrial development • 1995 —Final Environmental Impact Statement for LOP: finalized the LOP DEIS • 1995 - EIS Mitigation Document: imposed numerous and significant mitigation measures on development of LOP • 1995 - Section 404 permit and associated 401 certification, issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Washington Department of Ecology, respectively: provided Corps and DOE authority to construct the surface water management system for execution of the LOP Site Plan, including federal and state authority to fill certain small wetlands located on the LOP site • 1999—Amended Section 404 permit and associated 401 certification, issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Washington Department of Ecology, respectively: original Corps and DOE approvals amended to revise the location and configuration of both the central detention/wetland enhancement feature and related wetland mitigation • 2000 - Environmental Checklist/Development Agreement: analyzed potential environmental impacts associated with adding (and vesting to 2000 development regulations) 500,000 square feet of development to the LOP Site Plan Stormwater Study (Sverdrup)—extensive stormwater analysis addressed updated local stormwater regulations in the context of additional 500,000 square feet of LOP development - Traffic Study (Transportation Engineers Northwest)—supplemental traffic analysis addressed potential traffic impacts of additional 500,000 square feet of LOP development 2000—Developmen Agreement for LOP: vested redevelopment of LOP site to 2000 development regulations font 20 years • 2002 -Addendum for Development Agreement approved by City's Environmental Review Committee • 2002—LOP Parcelization(LOP Binding Site Plan and later Amendments; Lot Line Adjustment): multiple lots created for potential sale to others • 20021—Development Agreement updated to incorporate reference to LOP Binding Site Plan, supported by amended SEPA Mitigation Document and providing that LOP development continues to be vested to 2000 local regulations until February 20, 2023. 2002 Development Agreement supersedes 20001 Development Agreement Section III: Status of LOP Vesting and Associated SEPA Review The 2002 Development Agreement vests LOP redevelopment at the capacity (3 million square feet) established by the LOP Site Plan, as amended, and associated SEPA reviews conducted in 03003-0104/LEGAL 15689674.1 4/16/09 Mr. Alex Pietsch April 16, 2009 Page 4 1994 (DEIS)I, 1995(FEIS) and 2000 (expanded SEPA checklist re-addressing both stormwater and traffic impacts associated with full site build-out). Vesting for the site was approved by City Council to provide certainty and efficiency with respect to the City's review and approval process. The Council's decision was appropriately supported not only by the LOP EIS but by extensive supplemental SEPA review that focused on the elements of the environment (stormwater and traffic) potentially affected by additional site capacity and development by multiple owners on multiple'parcels. With the construction of the'BCAG Headquarters, Family Care Center, Federal Reserve and Bank of America projects, which total 471,646 square feet, remaining LOP development capacity totals 2,528,354 square feet. Boeing anticipates that build out of the LOP site will occur within the 2023 planning horizon established by the 2002 Development Agreement. Thank you for your consideration of the information contained in this letter. If you have questions regarding the data,presented, or desire copies of any of the background materials described, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Laura Neebling Whitaker cc: Suzanne Dale Estey Larry'Warren Gabriel S. Rosenthal Jeffrey R. Adelson Shaurita R. Hyde 03003-0104.!LEGAL15689674.1 ' 4/16/09 III - Summary Response to April 16, 2009, Boeing Letter II The City agrees and accepts vesting described in the April 16th letter from Laura Whitaker which specifically identifies work products developed and actions taken by The Boeing Company and the City of Renton which include: • Development Agreement • SEPA work • Binding Site Plan For permit issuance for any activities located within the Longacres Office Park, the following actions/steps would be necl essary by the applicant and the City: Applicant: • Apply for Site Plan revi w • Applicatlion for SEPA review • Application for Building Permit review City: • Review proposal for consistency with use and development standards established in the Development Agreement. • Review proposal for consistency with SEPA work already completed. Insure impacts and mitigations have been identified. If not, additional SEPA may be necessary. • Review he Building Permit for consistency with International Building Code. • Prior to permit issuance,the City will evaluate any financial credits against required impact fees or other fees.