Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA02-052 , , I . I I I _ I ' E5•9 T23N RR E 1/2 1 r I 1 4th St. Fi -....s1 i----tts „t 1 1 I 1 1 11- 717E-11 St. 1- - —1----Ir-L ' ' OA z,clit ----7—=- , , 1 , . -.a, L: --1 - - CS --r- --.---- -' 1 cli . __ ; 1 C. NE-.! d 131: R-8 • 1 R-10 I 2 . . : g CS R-10(P) -- , —R NE 2nd St. h 1 7.1 1(9=-11-,-- .---,71Ti, T -,44--, RMH - r .--- IL(P) : 1 F I. 1 - i E9, ••,t:4k,. '‘" wittroz4i I 1 U • '1 • I .;1 RMH I R48 , ,00 . • 4i. \ ,__ ___,,.. , . . • , I RMH. , . > • e i :.. ! , . i .. , J • . i.-.._ 1 • . I-- -:1 ,1 iL! ! ii igi I • // / i 47--A-,4-Tci-- • ; / RC(P):--'„ / • , ' . vz, , , •i •/ / . . , ' • 05•2.1 T23N R5E E 1/2 , 'en,e`'. flii,),,NwThamcm...vic.?NICE -111I)E4`.10EL-auf-4 e-4" 'F5 I ,,-:\i„.70, 01/18/01 BUILZI NiCr siTE 16 T2...3N R5E E 1/2 ! _ 4•-36.-OZ I A I a ii .' ICROFILMED , • ME .:1 I-',:iv 1;'�'yt`i ; x",H.-1ti Q E1L 8 ^ / F 4 9�l `' / J 1. YEna / / \ ,/ - 44, $r. _ — h `�-\ (' F VICINITY MAP r% g y g I ml��' a i 1 Hi di d f B ��_, T NOEDAE e® i ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No: 162305512109 Ia hi ❑ §s • �/ i i / iI I &a' s an / / / ir ` )-FOAL DESCRIPTION: aR it/ / BUILDING AREA/ RBLDG.'C' .��$ - I / / 990®SF ruar PORTIONeF THEewTHEST QUARTERsossr, TENORMEA9T „- \`J� / /� WQUMCIT'6 fEiNT KING CPN'TT.Wft&1HrMra�Y DEBLT+B�EDT•UTILITY I I / - SLAB ELEVATION ((��� FaLwB. LanTR.. / 9 / I I 10�5 BEGINMG AT THE EOTTH1EST CORER OF SAID SOUTREST L IY QUARTER Q=THE NORTHEAST QUARTER F) vi 670 / } /I / ^ RENLE SOUTH S9•C."EAST THE SOMA LINE OF SAID U• W I i 2 91IDDIvl101y A DISTANCE 6 60333 FEET,TO THE RISE POINT / BLDG.'I' 1O3 / / / 1/1III o 1 DOF a Oro,.EAST,A D18TANDE 383,3 FEE. W ° /! / I/ I THE EADTLPEH CF SAID SIEDIVIeIONTACE 6 bA3 FEET.r0 I'U — 1/ �, 5 0"I FIST VCEa s6)96 FEET TO THE Sc.T.AST C L RR G SAIDSUBDIVISI 1�MMM` BLDG.'2' 1O3 i//x / smDlvl iOri A ICI rs 6,336 FAT To TA L roAID �yWl \� I • T I��� / C+ , "s !I ExcEPr THE LEST 3m FEET THEriECP. W .'e /'/ P. i PL6B9•m>•m'r bum• I m - i ASPHALTPAa N. N t I;I e PROJECT NARRATIVE:r._—--_ — R BTOR11WlER DEIENTIR119 FEQIIIFED BY THE Oltt 61 NTW FOR THIO PROJECT.ALL 414ggg�L / 9'J9' DONSTREAM TE II'FILTRATIW POND WLL PROVI...OE.TER WILL BE DETANED ON SITE A. DE eO•EE.TEIR=ALI,TREATMENT01 WILL NOT IMPACT 1ERNEW lO6 / �/ / .TERTHRoU H THE euFFA�SOIL Aw v.POLLUTA FILTER STRIP WLL ALSO G ASS ELAD S.THE 41, , I / WW ER L Lltt FACILO TO REMO E FVLLY AV 0 BY FIL RATION T ROGH GRADS BLADESPROVIDE / / �.DRAMS A FOOTING DRAMSWLL BE CONVEYED TOTHEON-SITEIFILTRATION PODaO9EPAFATFLY. DRVEWAYWBE0 oPEpTO4LOWSHEETROW6THESTOfdfWATER n ( OIRB CUTO AT ILIER 9 BLDG. ^ RUDE TO THE FILTER STRIP.( REPORT FOR MORE NFORTATONJ I Il I.� STRIP AT r-6•'Oc w 7 I EXIST.IIDEVELOPED 3 I I ' PEET AND PLAT NEW 1O SITE PATH: (�� (VEGETATION GREEN BELT 9 - T Icy ASPHALT PAW.AyyW�T IBTIYa 9 SITE AREA, DOS S SF I,.I L J BViER) 9 9 IMPERAGES SURFACE AREA Bea]SF iIC EN..DF LOT...RAGE, Ma dI Id '' . AI.mm'bSF PLARIY AFEd. __B __ __ __ , CITY RENT ON ACCESS ROAD �f�IeTPL ASPHALT I GENERAL NOTES:STORM DRAINAGE Q JaD TO REMAIN _I 01'L9'E 6B3S' t L ALL RENTONN STAND..BPEGFICATA.MATERIALS IO.AND ugDOT/AFWA STANDARD SPECRICATIONS,LATEST L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITII P.LATP-ST EDITION OF THE m Z EDITION Vf� ] EXIST.SITE BOIDARY TOPCYMARIIC INFORMATION,AND UTILITIES ARE ESA.,"ON A SURREY 8 BY NEBRANY,STEADMAN I ASSOCIATES PeD,DATED JILY lmmm. �l 3. A COPY GF DOSS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOS SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS II INFROGRE&I. `o Q • EXIBTMCI ION.COUNTY g ACCESS ROAD A ALL STORM DRAINAGE PfRDVETETITB SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED M ACCORDANCE WTH THERE cs 11111,. AFFIRMED PLANS ANY DEv1ATON FROM T..PLANS WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE WFER 8 y I PARTIAL DRAINAGE PLAN ® ENG6EERANDAP IATEPUBLIC AGEN,CIES IIIIIIr 5. IT S13 HALL BE SOLE I REBPCWITS SIBIOLI F T.CORRACf ANY QU OR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY w>- i 6 EXIST.UTILI LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE ONLY.IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORIS u fPCTNSIBIL VERIFY L AND DEPGIS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 1 Li- Z V I. UP..OINERWISE NOTED ON THE PL.BTCRM DRAM AD SANITARY SMER PIPE SHALL BE ONE O=Ti.FOLLOW. LL APvC COPCRMIG TO SECTION 9-.v OF II.STA`DAIR SPECIFICATIONS. _ B.HD,-HICdN-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE D.L WALL GERMINATED 1 RIFE WITH AN MTEGFALLY 5 W I FORPIE BM D OO.ITERIO¢TO THE REQUIREMENTS ON M PASHTO -29,TOPE S.PROvIDE PVC W RIBBER SEALS W I S. ALL PIPE EEDDIG SHALL BE AP.TYPE T.FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE TIE PVC,alp OR ADS/. U 9 ALL R/D FACILITIES WLL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CR IN CONJUNCTION WITH J Q J ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.6E36 THAT ACTIVITY EXCEED,THE CAPACIT AD INTENT OF THE O H EFDSIOW9EDP ENTATICTN CONTROL FACILITY OR UNLESS OTHERNSE AP ROrED BY THE CITY. LEGEND A DEW�E ON DEB A D/�F�L ERTRP PIMPS SHALL WTI T RUC ED,BEDDED` -DRTEEEDED ION IN T. Z W -ROOF OCMUNSPOUT TGHTLME FOOTING DRAM PLTEIR,TRP(MUST BE ESTABLIOHED. O V o �H �'F�'R L N REQUIREDSTORM STO DR NA.FACLIr1E0 MUST BE CONSTRCTED AND M...NCR FRICR ~ ALLi —EXIST L. TO T.INSTALLATION O=ANY PEW PAVING UJLESB OTIE..APPROVED BY THE CITY OF a —NEW CONTOUR DEPMTPIENT. Ix. ALL STORM DRAIN.63 AND CLEOUTO IN T REELED GRADE. PAVED SHALL BE FITTED MN TRAFFIC SEARING CO CLEANOUTS SHALL BE EXTRIDED TO VERS. AI B. /BFDNNTATION AND POLLUTION CONTROL MP ARaSHALL sE BE PROVIDED, ^1 CONSTRUCTION INTA ON RED RAD/EOR RERACED....ART.,B THEUN Y E CONY cTOR TIL /V IS CGTMRETED. or SITE PLAN I ALL ISPOR IATICN CN THIS Docvmrt BCALE�T••,Dm•-m'• IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROVERPY W PACSIC DiStEERNS OO COPIReRT SI�A E0,ILO A ,2omxolu,xo„Nm .0 - - - don No.AO,em k. Yj .�SK 1 ATN C:. ..' ,I r. ow- d a asc NE xND Sl£i 99 lol Im] II3 S Im5 Imb lot %r .y -.wQ�ga J // j x'` T 'gL94�°��j '� psi SS / EIST �UNDEVELOPED \ I / i 3' '-Z^�•'.�Q LSY fir. _ F /� xmm•• TYPICAL / I .. rj� im•-m• / VICINEITY MAP p� g a EC J IEW P AN P.J EXT.LTG FIXTURE 7 "° 9 g u m1 f t— ASSESSOR'S PARCEL No: 162305912105 a# aI 1 II IAI ARCHITEONRGL 911E FLAN AND PROJECT INFORMATION p , �>9� 'FLt 8 I N Afd�V1TEC11dtAL 0.GVR RAN <1 $ 88$ ill ,J ✓\ V AS ARONITECNRAL BLIILDNG CEVATION9 BUILDING AREA I CI SITE a AND FF0JE STORM DRANAGE)ORMATON g 99mO SF I 1O: re PROJECT NARRATIVE: -•-'1 BLDG.'C' CONSTRICT NEW U2ArEuw9E FOR POLICE EvroENCE STORAGE um ASSOCIATED PAN. ('A BLAB EL£vdTION FOR SEE CIRCULATION AND PARKING.CONSTRICT INFILTRATION POND AND FILTER STRIP FOR i Y re STORM WATER TREATMENT. \ k •'�TB I SITE DATA: p•^I m I \ �/ �. O I PERCENTOLL9 OT ACE AREA 21 9F�` W o 'Jlltl LL 9 �OF w�.ERAr.E, iin`6 es ""I o �I AREA UTT�I 103 y ) QI PLANB'G AREA HOD SF :•p BLDG.'I' I / 5° / BUILDING DATA: •�� / ZONING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL(Px,AQLFIER ON i 104 / 1 PROTECTION ZONE x. I / q} DEVELORIENT STANDARDS HAX BUILDS.HEIGHT.SD." 2T-6"FR.OVIDED BLDG.'2' /// \ F;AHTING .LTG.F1xnLrff eIII4 (CITY CF RENEW BELLA.SETBACKS STREET -I I O5 \ / STRIP IH¢b SF - PHOTO-CELL AI 91'FNRT Aft TY LINE•5' .xm —xm-6 PlmVlom I 6 \ ASPHALT PAVING (x9 I -' OCOPThwEs N 6-1 WARF,T1.(DEAD 512.21e. \• BASIC ALLOWABLE ARE,OCCO 9A 6W \I I AREA PROVIDED:SS.SF. IR 899•m3'W'E_BO' / PARKS.fE.UIFED. DEAD STORAGEmfEQlIR9 B PAR P G AffA '942042•36m NEW i\f °" f ecRE4(p.. B'ODE N9WY LANDSCAPING VISUAL BAFItIER� L ft m • /- / xm'-m" k !E RED.ExISTPIG F�9TED GfdEN BELT /. ImV WITH PROVIDES Tiff VISUAL BARRIER BLDG. I m1O SPH LT PA EXIST. 0 .,ACCESS ROAD 2I I J 1A 6 1t W I \I I EXISTS.I0(DEVELOFED B I_ GENERAL FIRE PROTECTIQL NOTES. FORESTED GREEN BELT 9 J �� J (VEGETATION BREW 9 \ CITY OF RENTON ACCESS ROAD L BE STORED IN RCPA APPROVED LIQUID FLADABLE A.00930TIBLE OR r°A132 Er9.TERJALS wu �N ]5'-m•' Ex19ADT o�C T NO PUBLIC ACCESS) T.AMOUNT CF FLATMABLE AND NOT EXCEED THE ITS INVCAT COMBUSTIBLE IN TASTABLE 19mx9-A UFG.SHALL 1 59 6BSS GENERAL INFORMATION Z V L DON NOT SCALE ORASIMG9. Q J S V6EY ALL GRADES%EXISTS.CONDITIONS AT THE SITE BEFORE J •ml'IB'E PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK 0- 3. REPETITIVE FEATURES MAY BE DRAW ONLY ONCE,60 SHALL BE 9 w COMPLETELY PROVIDED AS IF DRAIN M RILL m I- �""�� PARTIAL SITE PLAN .1IIIIIII.°°a, A. VERIFY ALL ROUGH-N DTENSIC.FOR E.UIFTENT PROr,DED INTHIS gN EXISTIrcM KING C.NTY a•:e:I".]m•-m" IIII1P n11 CONTRACT ON BY OiHER9 ACCESS ROADACCESS, ALL VENTILATION OPEINTES S HALL BE SCREENED. W I- GO ° 71 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 6. YGRDTARB1.SHALLBEOFT.HIGHEST.LAITY AND IN Z— A DACE W.HAOFACTUER•S SPECF102TION9,DIRECTIONS AND W U 1 -- - - - -- _ - - --- I - -- - .AT - - FEdJTT4ObATIOHB. - r PORTION OF TIE 90UTRIEST QUARTER OF TE NORTHEAST Q LL Y QY.RTER of SECTION K,ttNNNHIP 23 NORM FAH' 9 EAST, t. CONTRACTORS HALL GUARANTEE AIL MATER/A S AND U_ -�CRY-GP F£NTgy KRG C.Ntt;WA04HR.TRL DESCRIBED P FOR AMRODOF-ONE-YEAR TROM DATEOF FINAL LEGEND: ACCEPTANCE BY m NIER w w PROJECT SITE: —--— WARIER FT THE 9.11M1AS T CORNER O SAID 0011TRNE9T U T.N.1 OF THE NORTtIEAST.TARTER ALL HAL PERFORMED ED SHALL C'OBiT WITH CT'6 RENrcN FIRE THENCE IOVTN DISTANCE EAST ALONG ET,TO THE LINE PONTAID UTILITY TRENCH 2ME:-�----�- I 91IDDIVI�IOµ A DISTANCE 6 69339 FEET,TO THE IRIS P HARlNALS fEQUIFETEHIS. CU BY � AREA TO BE GRADED,———— THENCE NORTH 01'mN'13'•EAST,A 516141ICE 6 T;36353 BEE S. MSTALL FIRE PGLIbIER9 Am CABINETS PER COMA OR AS DIRECT 0 I THENCE SON.03E3'03"EAST,A DISTANCE CF 643 FEET,TO THE EAST LSE OF SAID 12ID01/19100 0. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL W SOUTH SN m1.0m'A9"YES(ALO.SAID EAST LINE.A CODE AND STATE P.TON AID CITY CF RIBITW REQUIREMENTS. zFIN D DNICEE 363.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORER OF SAIDSUB lT0 QE FILED UmER SEPARATE PERMIT) O V SITE PLAN IVISI THENCE NORTH S9•ml'16"LEST ALO.TIE eMH LSE 6 SAID IL T.CONIRFCTOR SHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR n SCALE:I•'.bD•-m" BbDIVI I A DISTANCE W bH336 MET.TO THE TOLE POINT THE COmR10Ns OF THE JOB SITE INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL FERSON9 ASS OFBCT' DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE YIORC TN19 REQUIREMENT WILL % EXCEPT THE YEST 3m FEET TffFEOF. APPLY CONTINUOUSLYAI0 NOT BE LIMED TO NORMAL LOW.HOURS 22 D. THE REQYRED AtOER TIRED DUTY O THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT TO CONDUCT cQB1RLCTION HE RENEW CF T.cONTRACrORS PERFORMANCE ORMAE DC£9 tC 1..AND A 1 le,NOT MENDED O INCLUDE RENEW OF THE ADEQUACY CF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY TEABLRS,N ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRICTION SITE ALL SFORIATION ON TEN DOOfffiR a'ISE EXCLUSIVE FROM-REY CP PACFIG ENGINEERING TECNOLOG@S,SC. 22,260 o,10.1u1 1xw) ®CCRIlIfiNT Zt;'K� J.No 210400 • O O O O O O as CARTER WRAP0 SPACES AT 2,0"•IIm•-m.• GLITTER OG RRm ( T MIL BCe ea,i•-o"oe r SCREW k D BN W"WaBHER, eat BD I I e-m I I I DDBNBPDIIT DO PAGET . OAP 0L MAX AP e1 B'-m'• !HITTER ypyp { yyaa�{ OO y( (31 V0".POP RIVETS &li REWB d & E+ie Y 41 pOLLNSPOUT Li EAVE GUTTER ❑2 - 1.11;ge - VEHICLE STORAL OP(16, VEHICLE STORAGE( 6 IN g. e¢s_o o..GMscRde O __ $5 LF-DRLLOG BCF£uB nIAMER Tr, ~ 1 [EW EASIER,EA.PAWN - `^ C,1 OH'ER..DOOR "�'GI JAMB MI _ (4.4 a).9, 1FWTIO O DOOR REM. RAKE TP✓M OVER EA .0 Mda, G IN"OAP < ^ .WIV S I\ ..RHR.y OU.VF1 W eHt!MR SCREW I ___ W 0 ...END DOOR TRACK JAMS PRE TREATED PLY11D BEE BOND.WA SHEET METAL OAK NUPE BEE DET.S - - RAKE TRIM ❑3 OVERI-HEAP POOR JAMS ® KJ- SECUREP SHORT x` TERM STORAGENAM WOE �, CABINET, @ O ROLLAIP DOCRD TYP. .,l W BEN:N I l� $f� 0 1 r ID i-r O TED O � a DOOR JAM TRIM\ at B Q SELF-OD,wuM BC WA6ABRI 0 HEADER PANEL HEADER GAP c Q J/ o,eElc-ow ii LL Cru O.C.MO UNYER, )" FLOOR PLAN nON) at1- BCALe.VD••.1•-m•• O' U - HEADER/PANEL CAP 171 0 Q I r_--r \ 63,.••DOOR JAMB SOALE 3 1 m _ 5LL 111 PROVIDE PR TO TPETAL W 3 Cx` BREAK SNAPS AT e e U EE EDGE PLYWOOD M o ."PLTILOOD WAINWAINSCOTRST I- ON v••RIPPING waEL p 0-I) Z W EXT.POOR JAMS 5❑ TYPICAL SIDING PROFILE El1 Ou euue,3",f-m erxe,3 .I•-m•• -11Z�3W 6WW x A2 ALL MCORKTION ON THE DOCV¢NT 1E THE I C1110WE PROPERTY OP PACIFIC DGRFdNY TECHNOLOGIE6,INC. COPTRK/R 2003 ,203,m114,11um 00 •I^e N 11a<Hmm 0 0 ti §a / I RIDGE NEWT RIDGE HEIGHT C A / eL.amm• EL.WO. i r I II IV �f am .1i 7mDu9Pa. P. i i if" •' -FAERIGTm rvETAL ROOF PANELS vPlYL FACED HTL RO F PAR IRl PRE-Fw�LYmrErAes°•roL TnL r@T.0 Puauu b 0 N"STEEL INSULATION DRAM.) L DIRT!,al 4'-O.mL jRCORTD'. PERF.PERPETER NON WI STEEL Trrou¢Fwaw MINED REM:RCM CONCRETE BLAB __.__ EL Im DRAW AND TCM LINE STRCTURLL, e ROOF DRAW TYPICAL GRADE LEE RAO ROO PM-11ER II a 11 glo FOIIOATIRI NSULATION SOUTH ELEVATION • Is •1 E4UILP NG SECTION III !a i age t 1a kk§ ▪ Iv gg DOOR DOIN I" .10.9 P- 6 RTO M DOLES ,ea) - RODE NEVaM I m I�.I Vi•• -id!' in.As. M GI 3mm c I e �Poa._m.. I r ,`i s w▪ Iv 0 VI1FETAL BUILDW3 �-3 VJ 3V1•' •�GJ I �� , W W•9.ATWALK WDOOR (.C.) aA d WIDTHDOOR •IT AT OM DOOR P. •,1 U 1 W�� SECTION 0 W • MONIED -------------1,*,,,.LINE NORTH ELEVATION E'er. • °CA Ei w"'''°" DOOR SCHEDULE ii DOOR FRAME D WIDTH WEIGHT THICK TYPE MAT'L FINISH LAOEL MArl. FINISH REMARKSxG�� 1 ? ROOF RITE O I 3•-0'• 1•-0'. 13/4" AD IH PT -- NH PT LCI:O SET.YEATIIER STRIPSTRIP.9n FACT en PT ELECTRIC OPERATION »•bum FETE BUILDING ? 3 e•-0 I3 en FACT 0, PT OPE RATION ELRAKE TRIM PA9CIA AND Ii B BTL FACT -- 9n Pi MANUAL OPERATION 3 3 0 1-0 13/4" A HT PT -- RI PT LOCK SET.MATHER STRIPING 1 1 METAL 50.TT, 7 F174Lallt.DOOR 1---...„.., I COUNSPaR CONECT #FETAL CLLLDPG 9T4mNm FI.W DOOR �y�\�`�� tal- TO TONT LIIE TYPICALZ1/IRoo�R LPEDOOR SGffDILLE ABBI�NATIGW'+ O _, !ll��� IOW FACT. FACTOR,.�LL METAL APPLIED YTOTO Q PA NT WEST ELEVATION en mg Ili 3W -.---------T—IGiADE LITE W F 0 4 e G W J 9 (' RWPRI --METAL fSIIILDPG _ g ____ _- _ - -- - -- - - -- -O-LL- - 1,— EL.U00' RAKE FASCIA AND W W ��� O O U3 T OI-rUP DOOR HIULL10Ir DOORH O0 N J 1 STANDARD HOLLOWZU • P. n V a RV Fn PE x I i �� bz�9e•GRADE LI@ 43 SLOPE ASFRALTPAN. FAST ELEVATION SL �OPE ASPHALT PAv RNEAD DCOF3I OGLE•w•.I•-m^ OV£WEAD DONO ALL PEOfaNTION W 1HI6 DCGVFNT AND CONCRETE SCOOP le TN EW.LIISIwE PROPERTY CP PACIFIC PIONEERING TECNIOLCL'IES,INC. Da COPTRYIR WAN 'A E 2.0,11 Wllwe NO Job No.mUHym i i i d ' P .► !, CIT7 L) E F R NTON ..t� r4'v Hearing Examiner Fred J.Kaufman Jesse Tanner,Mayor July 30,2002 Tracy Coleman City of Rentoi Community Services Dept. 1055 S. Gradyf Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H Dear Ms. Colman: The Hearing.Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter,which was issued on July 9,2002 was not appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Please contact City Staff for final processing. Please feel fre to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, " -, e i. CZ...A,: ',, r J Fred J.Kaufina Hearing Examiner FJK:kw • cc: Lesley Nishihira,Development Services Andree DeBauw,Development Services 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6515 R E N T ® N aiThis oaoer contains 50%recycled material 30%nostconsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE 111• AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Christina Meyers,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL --NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL . 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 - ENVIRONMENTALION REVIEW COMMITTEE a dailynewspaper seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al newspaper of I RENT ON,WASHINGTONlR published9 The Environmental Review general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of , Committee has issued • a publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily Determination of Non-Significance newspaper in Kent,King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a for the following project under the legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and POLICE STORAGE FACILITY not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below LUA-02-052,CU-H,ECF stated period. The annexed notice,a Environmental review for construction of police evidence vehicle storage building. POLICE STORAGE FACILITY Location: South of NE 2nd St., , on: 6/10/02 ' -East of Monroe Ave.NE. , as publishedAppeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing , The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$76.88,charged to !on or before 5:00 PM June-24,_2002. Acct. No.8051067. Appeals must be filed in writing 1 together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA Legal Number 10451 _ - !98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton ;Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. l Additional information regarding the Legal Clerk, South County ournal;appeal process may be obtained Jfrom the Renton City Clerk's Office,' (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by Subscribed and sworn before me on this j a of 2002 Y lI 'the Renton Hearing Examiner at his Ottil-- RcY/1/ I regular meeting in the CouncilOygaBBOBBppppqi ',Chambers on the seventh floor of; 0 ;\,,Ct� R�4.c - ary Public of the Statashing o I o��conside on r the the conditional use'2 at se' :4"A. •`�CyiON F�;jDi:l�vQoe residing in Renton ',permit. If the Environmental' 9 ;'�� TA 9`"N�� King County,Washington 'Determination is appealed, the �.0 q y ;�,a I appeal will be heard as part of •this —0— o I public hearing. Published in the South County, li.0 ptaa Journal June 10,2002.10451 _ I occ pa o�e®�° 1Aeir8W %° AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Kelly Williams being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 9th day of July, 2002 affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: VatAL3 `� : -61-1X--5 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 9L day of , 2002. _ir o D. f DOOo00 B0®4oQQQ .: ita qq m oy�y@�}6�� rA�t�xyM V, °,9 ).-0 4,6-j-ct_AzO ft ° '-. J Notary ublic ip.and f the State of Washington, J - / ° "r�Y� � �` i ;° : � Residing at � , therein. N.869-06• ", . Application, Petition, or Case No.: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. July 9, 2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND,DECISION APPLICANT: Tracy Coleman City of Renton Community Services Department Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H LOCATION: South of NE 2nd Street;East of Monroe Avenue NE(south of 3555 NE 2nd Street). SUMMARY 0 REQUEST: Applicant is.proposing to construct a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. SUMMARY 0 ACTION: DevelopmeritiServices Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on June 25,2002 PUBLIC HEA G: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary1 of the July 2, 2002 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,July 2,2002 at 9:03 a.m. ii.the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity Map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Proposed Site Plan Exhibit No. 4: Building Elevations The hearing ope ed with a presentation of the staff report by��esley Nishihira, Senior Planner,Development Services, City ocRenton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The subject site is located in the Light Industrial(IL)zone and is designated with a P-suffix(public use). It is also located within the Center z : Police Evidence'Vehicle Storage,r agility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H July 9,2002 Page 2 Institution(CI)Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map deskignation. The area is located just south of the existing Renton City Shops. It receives access off of NE 2nd Street via a private drive and is currently used for stockpiling and miscellaneous storage for the City Shops. The proposal is for a 9,909 square foot building to be used for police evidence vehicle storage facility. The site is relatively flat.It does not contain any designated sensitive;or critical areas. In addition to utilities and two parking spaces, a bio-swale infiltration pond would be constructed and located on the south side of the building for storm water purposes. Ms.Nishihira stated that two corrections have been made to the staff report and a corrected page has already been added to tl1e yellow file. Environmental review for the project was conducted and the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). No appeals were filed. There are 11 criteria to be considered for the Conditional Use Permit. The property is designated CI and the objective establislied,by this designation is to assure that adequate land and infrastructutle are available for development and expansion of facilities with a campus type setting and to protect adjacent uses from these more intensive uses. The proposal is consistent with the CI designation, it is within a campus setting and is a sufficient distance from residential areas. The property, as stated previously, is designated IL(P). The,P-suffix is for public use and requires additional notification if there is a change of ownership,tenant or general use of the property. The proposed Police Evidence Vehicle Storage is consistent with the current use so it did not require additional notification. Under the current Title IV, a"City Government Facility" is considered a permitted use. Presently,the City's police department leases a facility and uses portions of the Public Works Shop site. The facility would provide permanent space for the police department. The facility is intended to serve the entire Renton area and would not result in the detrimental over concentration of such use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. It is located within a city campus designated with the IL zone, which is soitable for vehicle storage and it is not situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses. The IL zone limits lot coverage by buildings on a parcel to 65 percent. The proposed structure will have building lot coverage of 4.4 percent,which is well within the requirement. A front street setback of 15 feet is required and there are no'"rear or side yards required when surrounded by the IL designation. The new building is proposed at 20.5 feet from the site's northern property line and is over 980 feet from North 2nd Street. The proposal is or a building height of approximately 22.5 feet well below the maximum of 50 feet allowed in the zone. The proposal does appear to be compatible with the surrounding area,which is predominantly industrial and is surrounded by concrete tilt-up and metal structures. The facility would be screened by landscaping which wouldlbuffer potential impacts to adjacent properties. The proposal is most closely related to dead storage in the current parking regulations and dead storage does not require any parking spaces; however, because police officers,will need to visit the facility to view evidence,two standard parking stalls will be provided. Police Evidence Vehicle StoragL--.ility - File No.: LUA- 2-052,ECF,CU-H July 9,2002 Page 3 The project woul d utilize an existing private roadway,which extends south from NE 2nd Street to the east side of the building. It ould include a minimum pavement width of 20 feet. In addition, sufficient area has been provided to alto a tow truck to turn around as well as other vehicles. It is not anticipated that the proposed use would negativel impact existing traffic or circulation patterns for vehicles or pedestrians. Short-term nois impacts are anticipated from the initial construction of the project; however,the applicant's mitigation plan as well as existing code provisions that limit work hours will mitigate and impacts. Once completed the proposed use is not anticipated to increase noise and glare impacts over existing conditions. The IL zone does require a minimum of 15 feet within the front yard setback to be landscaped when abutting an arterial street. Ini this case that requirement does not apply. However,the site plan does include the installation of 1,400 square feet of landscaping around the perimeter of the south end of the building. There are no str et improvements required. Public utilities are currently sufficient to serve the development. The applicant is required to extend the services and make on-site improvements as necessary to serve the property. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the City of Renton Police Evidence Vehicle Storage facility. Tracy Coleman, Community Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 stated that she is the project m inager for this project. There was proposed Jandscaping initially in the beginning of the project, which has been eliminated at this time due to budget restraints. The Examiner i quired as to whether or not landscaping is required. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 in response to questioning from the Examiner, stated that there has been discussion between the building department and aquifer protection peoplie as well as the fire department regarding leaks and how they would be contained within the building. They are developing a design and there is currently discussion about sloping the concrete to a floor drain that would then go into a tank that would be pumped so that any contaminated products could be taken off of the site. Ms.Nishihira, in regard to the question of landscaping, stated that the IL development standards do specify required on-site landscaping when abutting arterials,non-arterials or street frontages. Otherwise there is a general landscaping requirement that all portions of the site not covered by structures,required parking access circulation or service areas shall be maintained as permeable areas and improved with native drought resistant vegetative cove . In general,they are to provide landscaping in one way or another. The Examiner ailed for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further com ents from staff. The hearing closed at 9:25 a.m. FINDINGS C NCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewe the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applic nt, Tracy Coleman for the City of Renton, filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Police Evidence Vehicle Storage :...ility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H July 9,2002 Page 4 Permit to construct a police evidence storage building. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non- Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located south of 3555 NE 2"Street. The subject site is located on the campus of the City Shops Site. It is south of Greenwood Memorial Cemetery. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 3143 enacted in June 1977. 8. The subject site is zoned IL-P(Light Industry). The "P" suffix denotes public ownership and requires notification of changes in use or ownership. The City does own the subject site. The new use was determined by staff to be consistent with existing uses. In addition,this Conditional Use required notice and a public hearing. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of center institutional uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The subjec`site is approximately 613 feet wide(east to west)by 363.97 deep. The site is approximately 5.12 acres or 222,844 square feet. 11. Access to the site is provided by a private road or driveway off of NE 2"d Street. 12. The applicant proposes developing an approximately 9,909 square foot building near the north portion of the five-ac i• e parcel. 13. The building will be approximately 108 feet long by approximately 88 feet wide. 14. The building will have a slightly peaked roof. The building will vary from 18 feet to 22 feet tall. 15. The building will be a pre-fabricated metal wall building. 16. The building is intended to house police evidence, particularly vehicles. 17. The applicant originally proposed landscaping around the south end of the building but indicated that budget constraints have led to removal of landscaping from the plans. Code requires landscaping in all areas not occupied by building or paving according to staff. 18. Staff has indicated that there is some concern regarding potential pollution due to leaking vehicles that might be stored on the subject site. The Fire Department has also taken notice of the proposed use, as they are responsible for responding to hazardous spills. The applicant has indicated that the building's floor system may be redesigned to contain spills. Police Evidence Vehicle Storag..._...;ility — File No.: LUA- 2-052,ECF,CU-H July 9, 2002 Page 5 19. The building will cover approximately 4.4 percent of the site whereas 65 percent would be permitted. 20. The IL zone requires a 15-foot front yard street setback and no other setbacks. The applicant will be providing a 20-foot setback from it north property line and is well set back from the street. 21. Staff noted that the proposed "dead storage" use does not generally require parking but that the applicant has proposed two parking stalls for those picking up or dropping off evidence. 22. The subjec site is located in Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. Conclusions: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C),which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffi and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Lands aping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appro riate; and i. Adeq ate public services are available to serve the proposal. The reques ed conditional use appears justified. 2. The Comprehensive Plan suggests that institutional uses be established on the subject site. The City's Shop campus is In example of institutional use. The addition of the indoor storage based police evidence building will fit in with that vision. 3. The community has a need for policing and its adjunct activities such as storing evidence. The large, relatively i I olated site is suitable for storage of larger items such as vehicles. 4. As noted,t e site is large and generally isolated. Uses on the site are well separated from any surrounding uses. Any mpacts would probably be limited to construction noise but not generally from the storage use itself. 5. The one-st ry, 22 foot tall building is low-rise and should not be out of scale without any surrounding uses Police Evidence Vehicle Storag:..azility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H July 9,2002 Page 6 including those onsite or offsite. 6. The applicant will provide two parking stalls that are not required just to make sure parking does not block access roads. The parking is appropriately situated on the subject site. 7. The interior lot should not create any adverse spillover of light or noise to adjacent properties. The applicant will be required to provide appropriate containment for potential hazardous spills or leaks. This might mean a"bath tub" floor or making sure floor areas can be cleaned without jeopardizing the underlying aquifer. 8. Code requires landscaping of sufficient quality to buffer the use from adjacent properties. Given the isolated site that can be somewhat limited and will be subject to review and approval of Development Services. 9. The site is served by appropriate utility infrastructure. Decision: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applic nt shall provide landscaping of sufficient quality to buffer the use from adjacent properties. Given the i olated site that can be somewhat limited and will be subject to review and approval of Developm nt Services. 2. The building shall be redesigned to contain spills. This may include a"bath tub" floor or making sure floor areas can be cleaned without jeopardizing the underlying aquifer. ORDERED T S 9`"day of July, 2002. (...._ k.,„„,_, FRED J. KA AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of July,2002 to the parties of record: Lesley Nishihira Kayren Kittrick 1055 S. Grady Way 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Tracy Coleman 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 ,, --_ Police Evidence Vehicle Storag'= - ;ility File No.: LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H July 9,2002 Page 7 TRANSMITTE THIS 9th day of July, 2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Ta ner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Rent n Planning Commission Neil Watts, Development Services Director Larry Rude, Fir Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation ystems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Titl IV, Chapter 8, Section 100G of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or b fore 5:00 p.m.,July 23,2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which ould not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take furt er action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this o 1dinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,July 23,2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pen ing land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal.,:Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Exa finer and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested partieT to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any jiolation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the •ity Council. El 9 (T23N R5E E 1/2 ,S --- C S I I— . ' A 4th St. I - NE •14 St.1 ,�- --- j iv- imi ______.0 I 1 --�— 1 ,.._.. __... 1 1 - _.r.L..- ___.1.- .1 .___ \ INE r3rd P . _ i _ ; _ -__C �_- — _rR-10 6 NE 2nd St. ---•R=1 s 1. I- ?- - 4 � i Ii RMHEb-— r , -�-;� , —1—.-- -. .1q \ff;" --. ILcP) 'c • t = r --id \ 1- ! w — — IT -ice R i • N - RMH _ �_ Rye ' E''wt I ----Tr i- - I- EA a- \ - •-"! ..... tri -----rn-i-r-% .7 -\ '"� RMH � � 7 , II1ii ; I. . iv 1 11111.30111111114* 110,14, 114?, if...-4 -- 4,--- RC(P) 4444 4r \--z ll cc 111 >-R-8/ 41111 F-- -- - ------ - k-S'' 4,0 1 'I -cc) 4* �'�� ' RC(P) /, i , (°**AA..41144A1 i G5 - 21 T23N R5E E 1/2 y ° `p° F5 U1 O'' Renton dity m1U 1:4e00 rZONINGU awALsaxnces •' 03/15/0216 T23N R5E E 1/2 �F • • • _._ 51JJ I i ImT A,e NRI •.;Sn ``.s. ^ `1 S ) I'. • t.. 1114, c yid R i J / / ''. " fie a ilm__ Loj ..---/ / /------ /------r/-- ___,-/-7-- : \ / / ••:...,,o,:‘,4,k,-.., 1V.••• ..•.•,..,. , j y,_-- ( / / VICINITY MAP H ,..• ...„ Q \ter 111 -t NOOC.. 1�1 �91- i L I A55E55OR'5 PARCEL No: 162305912109 i-� ;74--r i / % • , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: }` i' 1mN __�-� I} f- I BUILDING AREA' I p /11 BLDG.'G' 990©5F Tun PORTION o TLC WOTAN.GILMER a TIE NORIIE.bT -•E aIARIVRw SECT/ON r,TaeRRP ae NORMS RurasEAST, —J M COT CP RENTmN KING CON,.I.0.1.•TL�DESCROED BLAB • ELEVATION FOLLOWS. bli TIR.UTILItt i� / •. , 1015 I SOME.AT TLC ET COWER ROP END eamueeT OlONTER OF I"' T0.2 BOON WOOS•EAST ICON:T.SOON LINE R SAID . . MMMII // 1 ; 2 'N.COMCP µ.1.•DIETANE O 0...FRET.TO TK ORE rotor •jy m / I N' 1 • V O I na12.,RTN a•wv..,A m•r.ICE o.a.",REr: C) BLDG.'I' B I r I I e 11OCE AWNAR EN..EAST••OWN.O AO FEET.TO r 0O I I 4 TIE EST LK O�D EIEDMEHM •I r a O IIDISTANCE ONNAIN REr rO ISE LamEST SCOP w'o ew .� °U /-' III/ •IEaornewE r+F 1m. Tj../��"` (` ,i I TN I N RM R1.01 IE.ALac THE eaN LK O AIT a.F' BLDG.'7' 'I,i I .RIaL A DISTANCE 0 i �� _�+ 0 rye.rTlEEe•rEDROT TIaIEec.,ReT.TorNEiwEroNr w \L 5 / . I b iPL..+•ma•..•E Ens '� - - 1Y1ePu.LIPAwo _ ID c PROJFGT NARRATIVE: -. .� _ 'I Y R DOWD.I• ..NIe PROJECT ALL Ay+._ i l �� L / �'d j E"• .� ALTER " :ELr DE AVKD OM WE:.D�ENE dLro.�:Ln t r� �, �,NEW ✓ a° _ Pm oR.B�FAME'TO R M.E raLwrune NO VEGETATION•°DY:RTluOTAild TOOLI N gum 141.1 ALSO DE DOu L AST. {11. �° RLL RE CONEY.TO rNE OAS.MaTI.ATId noD /I y I I BLDG. I� -- cA®.CORD P.,OC. ae I 0 SEPARATELY.MMTEREDEN OACFOR TO REPORT rot.rn�E•OLOAED TO ALLOW/ PCIR ATI PLOW OU •TgE,WATER pp 1 I _ ' la '°` S AT FILTER STRIP.i TAPE oc �_ °CR.R+D. N '\�i• N I I I, I oeBTEn uoexLweD,9 I -""m AA µT NO ROCAMTN I'" t, 5ITE DATA: EL ( r.waEre W S Ol toE�T a § le, be `�� 4;'..r�E. T�meren em A t. MI.EE SI IS .. I e`'reEco ew.aE. :nwBP tl 12 i —_—_ . ALLWa.c.ND ruIDR MOO r CITY OF RENTON ACCESS ROAD HERON.ORMAN GENERAL NOTES:STORM DRAINAGE ADAD TO RDV.N ,,0 WALL BC N AW 4o44.1 E ON TIE LATEer EDInd.THE SITT O ••E'Oro'E eOr' ' P R rd erNID11O eEEDf1UrIPb NO aLDOf/Y9Y STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.LATEST W LDInW I. DT N[COP. RA.SRITE AID[...ART. TOR.... DATED PPONFIATIJLLT MOO'.1rle ARE DAP.d A Nwrc. ^,J' B • OP I K YTwDMD PLANE 1LST E!d TIE JOS EnE IRONER ONOTRE:Tid IS :VVVa ENIO AO2•E AO l ALL STORI DI..WNi EI RO.l1lNM NOLL PC CONTRYTED N ACCOMONICE WNW NEK .ANT DENATIRI Rawl TKR RAW WLL REOEIE APPROVAL TRDr1 TIE QIER u Q PARTIAL DRAINAGE PLAN ntllln, „OLD„�EL I 'INlln' I�QLMEL eoLLePo0lea �ITe YaNlnAcrloonr STREET T1RE�my W F OT1C R RELATED MIME MLR TO ANY CLWTRCTION ACTIVITY. • .ISILITT TO WEL.LOCATION U_� PEPT.PRIOR TO CO.ITIACT.L 1 NEE.OT1 .WEE TOTED ON TIN PLAN.ETON ORAN uo•umART SEVER PR MAT.DEO. In Q LL O 4 M1c-GOPTEIN6 To KGTb.EAD O M OTMCANO ePEOIICATIdl. LU 1 pWPF.NYAN-DWnT POLTEINTLEE 0..RWl COR RATED APE WIN AN NIE! .LY I %RP-0 N..DDIN NTERIO R TO REOI11pm01 O AADRO M TTR L AENEJE M1. Ill W I L ALL PPE DECO.NULL EE AM.TTE r FOR RENDLE PIPE(IN.PRE,err OR AD. U • ALL FWD PAOIITIEO WILL NO _ —I 0 \ w�DWNNroN.•NRK R1iId�L� ALLEn,.A 11150dP TO OR ndT INTENT OP. 0 [LL CONTF.TI OATId CONTROL 0 TNT ACTIN.0...TIN a ARA. 9 ea THE OTT. ^ LEGEND ba: Na E.rog.RODRP. �,`°"Lr':;®°�Wig.SEEDED E {L W -rcmlla DRAIN a r�iTew enM MOT Di EeT•gwin. -I -- D o0Nw. r�ANDir E ALL RECLINED OTT N oD....'.w I°°MOT oDCCONIRrTeo TNO�wa.Tld T.CITT o NI 11 ZZ u Ru raNraR R M.PONY RAG DEPARNOTT. °O ° d ALL ININED • D.NO CL6 DRAM APO O APRIA WALL PEE ROE°D wN TRAFFIC DEAR. GRADE, D.ERDND.T/°LDPOTT:TION 140 P0.11nIDN CONTROL TILAMES WALL.DE PROVIDED. C I TUMI AND/OR RER AS NE2 ACE0 eeA.RTA DT TIE CONDUCTOR INTl COM N le COPLE,ED. SITE PLANALL S 4Tw5 ON TN15 D 5. 6TQ co eC/1• 1m O TACOS E GEEER0 IECMI�ADILB•EC b •r.l�w I.T...R. De, (a)C TRNDNr IN N,.,K..AIm • • T r**r1 Z�r^p 'i t ` v m b, ' m. m. f�"Iffy"'4 At `l gEN 'Z 3 .......j_JI) -` „ __J ...AV) ) ---.) MET INDEVELORED y ; + L,r. y�,e IM - ____, .,'"-::f 7.4.i,"`--'q,:ii'',:.;'—•*,jr..7x70577 . . r _ /� m e\ \ L / VICINITY MAP ^' g ii ,, , / �. J cNF'rOTOK�` ` ASS SCALE 4 ESSOR'S PARCEL No: 162305912109 14 ij P.Ii t • i I INDEX TO DRAWINGS: �j + L r Al AROPITrrnEAL BITE ELAN NO EM2CT F RORWTEN i_a W U.rxwTECT .FtH C FLAN d En -. A,CMTCc,M1LNO PR LECT et0 DRAMA. !J 1 BUILDING AREA. I G r«a.,ATlw 9 1'{'j �k 9904 5F I k -( I, FL\ N„ - PROJECT NARRATIVE: c TRACT TED •—'- FOR roLri EADDCE RTC..AND AS.CIATED PAVING d---- BLDG.'C' FOR YlNlge CIRCULATION N0 PAMPA.CO.TR101 ML,N4TIw Fro AIO FILTER 0/RIP FO1 tt A EAD ELEVATION w NIX STEM MATE TPEATFENT. i y \ = SITE DATA: X..v ICI \ p RI ,SEWWI..AIwA, NAMEF" •E.X.0 OrITFmrArl j m' a e o 41/ n.M1TiG Nei, i�eo ei �i-` FI/ a> / I BLDG.•1 I r pUILDING;DATA: fTyZa1N0,LWM RO J6T*J4L rE=,AaJflR w��1 / -' I [ YPT. / veLeLa*,ea eTANowlma MAX.euutrc Felulr.SO-0- -.-weO.mcO Yw•1 PROTECTION D. // WV P J run a Imrtw, anLOTm eereAae elan IV I BLDG.'7' N PROTOR 6 .ewe.IO IQ.ue.SA Ale,e..e n I. AREA TWIOm,STATE ER. Q5 I FL S N•0eEVE RUPP N _ �/ I / A..aaNQD. D[AI,a C.. 0 V INEW ° �- SCREEN n •RIDE VISUALLNOSCAERO N peaR G, n"I I ^BLDG.` I' — D ems .+�r,'raT POND a,w e.nTec o .*•D:IDe.,.e H�,.L IL.. I I I 4 IR, AOPWALTACCEEeROAD MO... Rr FOREST. il a l I ,T J 1 OLDTRA:OORTLL'ED $ I_ GENERAL F9!PROTECT.MOTET FORESTED NeeLr G} L n.YnaeLE A.C°rvenaLE CR NKNoae PIAnwYD EEL L J CITY CF RENTON ACCESS ROAD NETR i I ` I z I.TWE 40?AHIT MO AIDLIC AO.b. I TIE GE*AMOK ORED o rLN.0 E w• oLORD ane neia LODE Swu wr E,II TN•O" I t ROAD TO REPO. ENGIRD M NY1FNf ITS,TOIG.AIED M TADLE 1LWl-4 YAP i —--„—-- GENERAL T INFORMATION AT E.NM eaD� Z L DO POT KALE DRAMA. Q M.ROOD. nroru•e R ' t IL S. TTa REA..MAYOED OCT Ott OCTNOL DE Oof REIN.. Fvnvm FEL :H • PARTIAL 517E PLAN ,iIh A. VERVE ALL watlM-NDpORpNS FOR MFR.RIOODEORTWe dU) r.wTRACT OR DT O.. r ....A0 0., .BALE,I.,Av-Ar gillll• S. ALL VENTS-All.oEelFn.RFlALL .cam, Dr.SOIRM.D. W I- f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: U •C.00.10,4.rlwIA 14.0 a ��iw.:D.0 ...NO W U 1 rwar FORFK.I a M 60.1D EST GILMER a ME,ORDEAST L�.TseRe eFE • O Q WART.0 FFEONcr RITE, —___ / I F�awraa wn rO1'P'aan,'Fu,Ls'�"lTw r eauxi +. mrERAL COININ POR To.1.0 w MML..NVE ALL DAM o P LL O. LEGEND: / ARtull wLi ,.e DD.PART ALoe e.O F.weuEer ,' A. Sri 1°"ar D:aueR G,..Lr YAW BITE .w I,� W W // DEe E.OP'TLE PO.fe:[PORTER YFLIx TIRNO1IWiG-._._._._._ M PORT L.a eAID MAAEN4,e INOP� TE a•TLTM U A@A r I N1 A DISTANCE OF O.FEET,TO MET.POW J O a _ _ OI- T..NORM ROOM n•0)M•EAST,a DIeTNIa OR a.IAR e,TO DT PIPE FLOE L '�'®AND(Je.eiR PER Wt a on AA DMlcRD a_4) M&LET LPE a SAID EDDMeION O. ALL ELECT...SO.DOLL COT,WTI M TIOML.ELECTING. W NORM • T .RAO . � a GTo wEa u SITE PLAN J DETANE NET TOMS C.wuaCP..ID TA T rOR DI Tw FT M O SAID� A O AO. TEE INR µ CODE PILED VDERKMA SEPARATE SION IE M CgOPICT°R oM wveOLELY NO o ONOnu eLOP ALL aanmomrt AV NO L� a PROPERTT PRO. E,tC2Tf M WEST J01En MREa. API.,COODLICUELT NO wr re LOTTED TO wawL COt 12 MDmze. A a MF...AOAOR RELIED O,rR a MRN.....•i TECT TO COME 1 AD Al le NET MEA. TO RCLIOF 040 T a M MOTIO1 T a M COMITGICTOIRa BNETT PEA..IN w as Ts.AR M COtlTRCTIw an 7. ALL eecor ATIOM w Me 000f94T ID 11 E EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY O ; P' p�hTm0M'� City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY 2,2002 Page 7 of 7 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Light Industrial with a Public Use suffix (IL-P) on the City's Zoning Map and Center Institution (CI) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. The proposed use would be considered a government facility and as such requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the application has been amended from Administrative Site Plan review to a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. 3. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Fire Prevention 1. Fire Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. 2. The preliminary fire flow is 2,750 gpm. 3. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to be located within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width with an inside turning radius of 25 feet and an outside radius of 45 feet. 5. Fire Department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to provide an approved vehicle turnaround. 6. Please provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous chemicals to be stored or used on site. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The site is presently served by existing roadways through the City Shops facility. 2. Street improvements are required, including paving of access roads/driveways, curbs and gutters. All improvements are required to comply with Fire Department regulations and provide adequate storm water/surface water drainage improvements. 3. Traffic Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an existing 12-inch water main located at the north side of the site. 2. The site is located within the 565 pressure zone and Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. 3. There are two existing fire hydrants that may be counted towards the required fire protection of the building. 4. Hazardous materials stored on site shall require containment facilities for both the materials and for spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to collect any spilled material or floor wash-down to a mid-building floor drain via closed drainpipe,to a storage vault outside of the building. This vault must provide access for a pump out vehicle on a scheduled basis for removal/disposal. 5. A water meter shall be installed to furnish domestic water to the site for cleaning purposes. 6. An operating permit and facility inspections may be required depending on the quantity and variety of hazardous materials contained on site. 7. Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main located in the City Shop area north of the site. 2. No sanitary sewer service is proposed for this building. 3. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Level I drainage report was provided with the application and found to be acceptable. 2. Surface Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete,three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the 6th floor customer service counter. hexrpt Q Q I I i! NO.LEICA0 ill,1 A 1 _ (511""2".2''.7 • ��' ' ..ID.>K�R.ro "".°°fir° '.MI OLE. PAWLS , KTAL nAdW I IfL-fwLnED t ET.LL e�sG e,EP1 fwYE TINE TEL >2 ' 1 °RM,RO•l 1' ! A .N°Trek at me. 1. FLOOR LEE ONE ONEICONALT • SOUTH ELEVATION ;21i @ li ..�.w- �i,_e 4,s VALRINC?SECTION I'i • sRs I 9 WI ,iD 2 KIaMI 'MID° • I ;m, I •-,N- I N-AT CNA°�°m lao 0..y —1� N'16 M i. l �, -��mm. r T� sl ab °a) �,` wy o nerK mnn�l l I • •� u`s afm.R r I�.. l ^�-�1-)N' )N of wont.>-.roux"ooa ("8 W �® ri r onon mon r.T o.f o°oR "'f t.' o.end I j � .m. • SECTION n W FLOC.LOC NORTH ELEVATION 5e,,\• °c..t1�w'•P•P DOOR SCHEDULE if DOS DOOR FFm11E REFTAFX8 WIDa uEJOI T'THICK TYPE MAIL FNI84 LABEL I'1ATt FMIEN IL_f.� (.) 01 O I. T., iw^ . u, IT NI IT LOCK BET.uuncR.nur.a# . q ``�I'' IVL�IEOG[ Q >m' • IT ELECTRIC oRiunw FETAL OOLONG H Y -TNT u••P.E..L.o�,... 1 ,/ . f °m°,. ` 7 iI , i i O .Cr $MET.tL ENIDw.°rM01eA MW°KRLO / 1 i I I I LNE MGM °°°" ..� �n o EL a FETAL PT rANT 4 IL .'...�w-.r•o- O °TE" -WUESTELEVAT ION j SWF ��a.°.k.. MOP 1 oi I ' L� ji �o..°...a A 3 ...seA TPVT. EEST ELEVATION i�ro s •r° EAD OOP.F Al. .nw r °D AID O?CIETE°ttQ TO TN!...waive I OP[TI.Cr 3 r.rxo aT . q . SCartT3002 • 0- O L O Q pD At)). 0.b- 10 ati. o T I • P� , aMM a W•,.o.A fle Dar a on... 11 g 0 id I D00.NSPOUT IIIEAVE GUTTER 0 --—' --— - 3'a g;s Eie �j' )ac{e /—Dm...`w.eo�e 0 -— -- w,^,•erowDae n, wane Dra..D.rw --- 1p 6aP.0)..aa Doc / uMao m., i �IilliAA 00 Lew n11. w Mole A • (111 T.•RM.ot..a `N. • —— n)'.o•oG -»ter& :- 1 ---i. k D.TMTN.PLY.AY 06EF W ❑ eKLT.lrK bSK�e.U.'C K[CEr.D RAKE TRIM 3 OVERHEAD POOR JAMB L'.Jr ---- SECURED SNORT f,Ni TERM STORAGErun.WOW ,� .—_— ueuere I, -- \ / WatN LAO I I I )K FLOOR PLAN ®� LI r. - HHEADER/PANEL CAP b w Q g1 non za 111 .,arose M.t)°D ° w a� e�BOW. I I 1 0 w EXTT.)DOOR JAMS 0 TYPICAL SIDING PROFILE I] • A2 N.L DRa•4TD:N CH T1.DOGt 1T M T!Co.....DwoPp.rr „Aga DGDF20b T.T aF4 DG rv.mw,...v.,.w. n° ®osmaw boo) oaw S CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 2, 2002 AGENDA .COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s).listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-052, CU-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE 2nd Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height (approximatey 22 feet) and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. Location: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE. hexagenda City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEAR NG PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SU1MARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: July 2, 2002 Project Name: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Applicant/Contact& Tracy Coleman (x 6623) Address City of Renton; Community Services Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Owner/ City of Renton Address: 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 File Number: LUA-02-052, ECF, CU-H Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. Construction of the facility is anticipated to be complete by the end of this year. Project Loc;ation: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE (south of 3555 NE 2nd Street) L_ 0,-iim 14141-i le—.4, 61 NE t z St , ql R-8 Li ail_ II 1 _ -- cis CD rR-10 2 R-8 CS R-10(P2--f-�-- - i VI- 9- NE 2nd St. - �Z-11 r i 1 tr RMH - �. - IL P) r�` d .._ Z-hite, / � RMH R48 � -f.t it TI ' City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY2,2002 Page 2 of 7 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 2. Zoning Designation: Light Industrial with "P"suffix—IL(P) 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Institution (CI) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: City of Renton Shops stockpiling/storage 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: City of Renton Shops Facility; IL(P) zoning East: Residential; RMH zoning South: Single family residential; R-8 zoning West: King County Roads Division Facility; IL(P) zoning 6. Access: Private street off of NE 2nd Street 7. Site Area: 5.12-acres (222,844 square feet) 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 8,923 sf Shops facility buildings New Building Area: 9,909 sf Proposed storage facility Total Building Area: 18,832 sf N/A C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 1"4t„=., N/A 3143 06/13/1977 omprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/1993 D. AP LICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-130: Industrial Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 5. Chapter 11 Definitions hexrpt City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY2,2002 Pagf 7 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Center Institution objectives and policies. F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The City of Renton is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE 2nd Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height (approximately 22 feet) and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. The subject site is relatively flat and does not contain any designated sensitive or critical areas. Grading activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards for preparation of foundation, paving and utility improvements and to match existing grades. In addition to the installation of utilities and two parking spaces, the construction of a bio-swale infiltration pond on the south side of the building is proposed for storm water purposes. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On June 4, 2002, the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the project. A two-week appeal period followed this determination, under which no appeals were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES It was determined by the Environmental Review Committee that there were no adverse environmental impacts from the project that would require mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: Section 4-9-030.G lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE & OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (a) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element The subject site is designated Center Institution (CI) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The objective established by the CI designation is to assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the development and expansion of facilities with a campus type setting and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. The proposal is generally consistent with the CI designation. hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY2,2002 Page 4 of 7 (b) Zoning Code The proposed use is located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation. The subject site is also designated with the"P"suffix. The proposed "City government facility' is permitted in the IL(P) zone with the approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The"P"suffix designation requires additional public notice and comment periods if the proposal would change the ownership, tenant, or general use of the property. The proposed storage facility is consistent with the current use of the property by the City of Renton. (c) Development Standards The proposal appears to be in compliance with the applicable development standards of the IL(P) zone. The project's compliance with specific development standards, including height, setbacks, lot coverage, landscaping, and parking are discussed further in the remaining conditional use criteria. (2) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. At present, the City of Renton Police Department leases a facility and uses portions of the Public Works Shops site. The proposed facility would provide permanent space for the Police Department to store vehicles obtained for evidence. The facility is intended to serve the entire Renton area and would not result in the detrimental over concentration of this use within the City or within the immediate area of the site. (b) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location appears to be suitable for the proposed use in that it is located within a City campus designated with the Light Industrial (IL) zone and is not situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses. (3) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site development standards shall be required: (a) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The IL zone limits the maximum building coverage on a parcel to 65%. The proposed 9,909 square foot structure on the 222,844 square foot lot would result in a building lot coverage of 4.4%. (b) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The IL zone requires a minimum front yard/non-arterial street setback of 15 feet and no rear or side yard setbacks. The new building would maintain a setback of approximately 20.5 feet from the site's north property line. The proposed building would comply with all setback requirements as the property lines are currently situated. (c) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. hexrpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY2,2002 Page 5 of 7 The maximum building height permitted in the IL zone is 50 feet. The project would result in a building height of approximately 22.5 feet, thereby complying with the height limitations of the zone. (4) COMPATIBILITY: The subject property is located within a predominantly industrial area and is surrounded by concrete tilt-up and metal structures. The proposed facility would be screened by landscaping (existing and proposed) which would buffer any potential impacts to adjacent properties, including the residential parcels located east of the site. The project appears to be compatible with the existing development and character of the area. (5) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. The proposed facility is most closely related to the "dead storage" category within the parking regulations, which does not require parking spaces for this type of use. However, in order to reasonably accommodate authorized personnel visiting the site, 2 standard stalls have been provided. (6) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The project would utilize and further improve (in order to match existing grades) an existing private roadway that extends south from NE 2nd Street to the east side of the building. The roadway, which is currently used by the City of Renton and King County, would include a minimum pavement width of 20-feet. In addition, adequate maneuvering area has been provided to allow for vehicle/tow truck turnaround. It is not anticipated that the proposed use would negatively impact existing traffic or circulation patterns relating to vehicle and pedestrian traffic. No additional street improvements are required. (7) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, fight and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Short term noise impacts are likely to occur from the initial construction of the project. The applicant's construction mitigation plan, as well as existing code provisions limiting construction work hours, will serve to mitigate these impacts. Once completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to increase noise and glare impacts over existing conditions in the vicinity. (8) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. When fronting a non-arterial street, the IL zone requires at minimum of 15 feet within the front setback to be landscaped, as well as all portions of the site not covered by buildings, structures, and access ways. Although the site does not immediate abut an adjacent right-of-way and is separated from NE 2nd Street by existing structures, the project includes the installation of 1,400 square feet of landscaping around the perimeter of the south end of the building. hexrpt • City of Renton P/e/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JULY2,2002 Page 6 of 7 (9) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. The use and proposed expansion of the site as a City government facility requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There are no accessory uses included with the proposal. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The subject site is currently undeveloped and the conversion of an existing building is not included with the proposal. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. No street improvements are required of the proposal and public utilities are currently sufficient to serve the development. The applicant will, however, be required to develop the extension of these services as necessary to serve the structure. The applicant is encouraged to review the Advisory Notes section contained at the end of this report which details the existing conditions and code requirements relevant to utility improvements. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the City of Renton Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility, Project File No. LUA-02-052, ECF, CU-H. hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-052,ECF,CU-H PUBLIC HEARI VG DATE:JULY 2,2002 Page 7 of 7 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Light Industrial with a Public Use suffix (IL-P) on the City's Zoning Map and Center Institution (CI) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. The proposed use would be considered a government facility and as such requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the application has been amended from Administrative Site Plan review to a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. 3. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Fire Prevention 1. Fire Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. 2. The preliminary fire flow is 2,750 gpm. 3. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to be located within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width with an inside turning radius of 25 feet and an outside adius of 45 feet. 5. Fire Department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to provide an approved vehicle turnaround. 6. Please provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous chemicals to be stored or used on site. Plan Revie —Transportation 1. The site is presently served by existing roadways through the City Shops facility. 2. Street improvements are required, including paving of access roads/driveways, curbs and gutters. All improvements are required to comply with Fire Department regulations and provide adequate storm water/surface water drainage improvements. 3. Traffic Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. Plan RevieW—Water 1. There is an existing 12-inch water main located at the north side of the site. 2. The site is located within the 565 pressure zone and Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. 3. There a e two existing fire hydrants that may be counted towards the required fire protection of the building. 4. Hazardous materials stored on site shall require containment facilities for both the materials and for spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to collect any spilled material or floor wash-down to a mid-building floor drain via closed drainpipe to a storage vault outside of the building. This vault must provide access for a pump out vehicle on a scheduled basis for removal/disposal. 5. A water meter shall be installed to furnish domestic water to the site for cleaning purposes. 6. An operating permit and facility inspections may be required depending on the quantity and variety of hazardP1us materials contained on site. 7. Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There i 'an existing 8-inch sewer main located in the City Shop area north of the site. 2. No sanitary sewer service is proposed for this building. 3. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Level I drainage report was provided with the application and found to be acceptable. 2. Surface Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—General 1. All plane shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete,three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the 6th floor customer service counter. hexrpt • • B T{ t '4ersr,b> - 3` R' d *1 NC4j EN 44 raillf .// ee Ew.oeED ATION TYPICAL � lJ : .1._.F.a.,7....ii.) : ,.60,...: �R _/ ./ iID,-D• / \ :m-e / VICINITY MAP e a ' / L_ _ i JEXT.LTG.FIXTURE ONPHOi° L / NO SCALE A55E55OR'S PARCEL No: 16230591210E 11 11 Ie I _ l �D I 1 INDEX TO DRAWINGS: �°!ff } i • A dRDIRECRFNL SIN PLAIN AD f'R'NER SFORYATKN E E E A2 ARCRTECTLRAL nwR PLAN < An 6 AR DATECTUPAL MED.ELEVATIONS J I O CIVIL STIE PLAY AD PROJECT STORM DRAINA.PFO IAT.N 0 I g BUILDING AREA 4 III p 9900 5F . k I PROJECT NARRATIVE: (-'--'1 I BLDG.'G' 9 CONSTRICT NEW V a•'- FOR POLICE EVIDENCE STORAGE AD ASSOCIATED PAM.. FOR VEHICLE CIR LEAT.N AND PA.RC..CONSTRICT!FILTRATION POND AID FILTER STRIP FOR ...I SLAB ELEVATION ON BIM STORM TINTER TREATMENT. 120 121 I — SITE DATA: C.) m I i "/ -\ 2 BITE I P AREA. e T Aran. en SF W 0 CV o i A D GRAD.PERMIT A COVERAGE RI.Y ""I,,1 T'mRND�N bS �— ) Q I PLANT AREA NOO 5F U►i{G' BLDG.'I' y / '-� / BUILDING DATA: a'�� I e �/ zTI a.. PROTEECT.NPOLIST ZLEN 2. reR C�+ W i De,ELaM•ENr erADal®S�nax.BUI.DWS RErA,r.ea-a• u•-B^RLm.DED I BLDG.'2' MD @ rDTYPRExrw, mtDw eET50 STREET L _1 / I.0O.BF O IMDTO-CELL PROIDE Ao Me.•IS. .]O• —S0'-n••P�vlDeo \ __ C _ A1RLL.T PAVPG rT��9 I TES TT.II-N TO �. .AI 1. 9 CDC,.AL 16.SA n AREA. CO 0F.MEAD eT�s, PH' . E.AED A I nrwS n AREA DAOm SA U / ONDED /A /( — m-D- / '�"� REQUIRED.EXIST.FORESTED GlFSEI BELT A I I BLDG. I S I 0 ASP.,Pa 3 UM EXISTS. o PROVIDES T.VISUAL BARRIER I 0 AMH,ur ACCESS ROAD a 4 I l \ IXIeTS.INpNELOPED S I GENERAL FIRE PILDTECTICN NOTEb III FORESTED CALM BELT L ��/ unw EIRER, G CITY OF flNTON ACCESS ROAD L ell/TULLE AND CcemuentxE aL NAra..+ny MATERIALS DLL Q I BE STORED eI RPA APPROVED LIQUD STORK CAEPEN. S EIESM.RERANPT WO ROL.ACCESS, THE MINT P RA`MAEI.E AND CF101IBTIBLE LIMNS BALL NOT • I T1-E 1 I TOEXCEED Ea NMO NT ITS INDICATED IN TABLE PA725-A UPC. - 1 _ _ GENERAL INFORMATION Z DO NOT SCALE MAWR. Q B L YEIRPY ALL GRADES Al.EIGSTNG CODITDNS AT THE SITE BEFAFE IL E!'gTS'E eBAS' PROCEEDS.WITH THE WORK ' E. REPETITIVE FBATFES MAY DE GRAN ONLY CNCE.BUT SHALL OE S W COMPLETELY PROVIDED AS F DRAW IN RILL. .`.I- PARTIAL SITE PLAN al1Im, A VLRPT ALL ROUGH.DIMENSIONS FOR EONPPIENT PROVIDED N THIS g cD DONTRAOT DR BY D �TIE ERS Iw.C NTY SCALE.I•.Sm•-m• 'I* r ACCESS ROAD GO Mt.ACCESS, ALL.NTT ATION OPEN[EU N4SCREENED.L DE SCREENED.ED. 1- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL EDRG,AERBP NULL DE OF THE NIG,EST MALI, D fl CCORDSCEUM M TAAIAC RERSSPECFICAT.NS.DI.CTIOmND 3 A y FECOf1SIDATIOb. 6DIANTER Y- CND RRCTOR&&ILL GUARANTEE ALL ILATEFIAL S AI D!OR A PERW P OE YeaR ITK.T1 DAre P RVAL LEGEND: ACCEPTANCE EY aLm PROJECT ORE. —-__ LARTERLA ALL SHALL PEI�OW'ED SHALL CLIPLY W1H CRY P fENT01 FIRSSTOW DISTANOFA. TTRU eLBDMeIOy a DIerAY£OP SHIES FEET.TO TR@ THE roNf AIVA TO AE CFMED.———— OP EEG.. s INSTALL PRE EXINGUIS ERS A CAB INETS BIE N TS PER Pra OR AS DIRECTED Q I TIAERCL NORTH CY..•EAST.A DISTANCE OP SBSSS PEET: BY Re MARSHL.A I HENCE i. T LEE CE SAID EAST.A DISTANCE P W FEET.TO DE EAST LSE SAID DONISIOt b. ALL ELECICowCAL Cow SHALL COOLY RN BE NARM RBC HE AL PLECAL illDET ACE SgITH R%•arAS•LIE.ALONG SAD EAST L.A CODE AO STAR OPNSHS Y .TM P D CITYRE TON R:ADEPENTS. Z J DISTANCE P xaee MET TO THE SgRRIAST CORER P BAD (TO P FILED UIDD¢SEPARATE PERM/ O V 51TE PLANJICM oxf NORM STOMP SECT ALO.N SPUN LPE P SAD a CONTR CTOR WALL E SOLELY nD COMPLETELY REePWR E ROF -Z= a'••e N.ILL•-p• SIODMSI(M A DISTANCE P N3As F.T.T6TRE TR0 PONT DE COIDRKND P ARE Joe ERE H1..]SAFETY P ALL PERSO.At. n P BGMNNI DUNS.P'ERWSOT P he S0M THIS RCCUL I WILL X APPLY CCMPEgBLY AND NOT DE LIMITED TO NOR9..COORF.HOU.. E EPT THE WEST JO MET THEREOF D. T.FEDER.AND/CFI IMPLIED DUTY PTRE ENGSEERARORECT TO CONDUCT “NSTRICTDN RENEW P TIE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE DOES K.AID IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE RENEW P THE ADEQUACY P TOE CONTRACTORS 41 SALTY PENEUES,W W ER LEER De CONSIRNCTN.N ERE 6. ALL BKOR•IATKN CH THIS DCCLNI 1f b TOE DKLIIDM PROPERLY CF 1 3 PACING INENSE T' C TEFbLOGER N trl 1T.mvm,..Rm,Ru. RN) ®COPTTEONT E11O2 JCS N.]ReAOO • • GUTTER PI.. O O O 0 0 0 �° .t!-m DG .SPACES AT TP-a•.IIm•-a• ww.,ewr rm !C b1f � ITL SCREW MY w GC ataum�G �!pID 1 I _ k 1 1 1 DOSNSPOIR DOYtlFaR . STRAP At P-DT (YIN) GLiIER RAX (lx VE'•F f VP RM1Ei! ENT FEL ECRELLB y' 0"OG IN 0iii DOWNSPOUT II EAVE GUTTER ❑Z IT EC>LE,!•'.T-O•' SCALE,!••.I'-0- +�ig VENICLE STORAGE(Ifi) VENIO.E STORAGEw p¢ktyEI( SEtP_DREIMG ac aluE �EEIF-06ER/E SOmltl o-... CU Caro,RIADn DOOR 8 U'�.° i.l y 4r CU 0 CZ TUMID RAKE TRIM OYHOffAD DOOR n •U c JAMB CAP Ni SW MK SCREW 1 m RJR..owaEL a �•b.1)F w AD DOOR TRACK JAMB FIREEK TREATED PLY./ E EO®.MY EaMET PETAL BREAK GRAPE SEE DST.E g .4 RAKE TRIM ❑3 OVERHEAD DOOR JAMB El SECURED SHORT 1, TERM STORAGE ��` FLAK ETOR - DADIETE s POLL-'IP DOOR TTP. x•-o"TYP, WDNK BE. I I QED +- DI 1 f f' DOOR JA m RE\ 0 - PDNLLED z �at �c Q J �� I R WADER PAL 1EADER CAP E O NE illiE_Iin)SELF-DRILLM `J CDR..At W-D-DG (N u1CS u LL o I6D FLOOR PLAN lilIFIIh w_ HEADER/PANEL CAP id Z— wu 1 6 al,DOOR JAMB LL PRavmE WI.TRPI Wal TO!AIM PETAL BREAK SHAPE AT I U DS•OlED PLYWOOD SA"PLYWOOD WAINSCOT EICOE .1 A A'!'RAM.otEL O 0 PR in $$0-N EXT.DOOR JAMS 5❑ TYPICAL SIDING PROFILE WF Vu x A2 ALL NCRIATICN ON OAS DOO.PENT 16 T!DKUIW!MC/PERM CP 0.200 m,T.uaT,.1. (»' PACIFIC®C NEENPG rrt x(EoxM�•PC A Job NS.WSMme • 0 3! I RODE HEIGHTRIDfE HEIGHT k EL b00' EL 000' IIII /OWNSPQLM �I I(�I ' II' I f METAL A I I I EXTERIOR WALL ASSEFOLr•-0 VINYL FACED INSULATION ST.L �FIB rRtt-ru Plnewa 12 p.-FRISHED FETAL ND. 1 1 e VP STEEL GnSA el.a•.0'•OG y I I R ITFO CEO CONCRETE SLAO 1 I V I• I 'I FLOOR0 LINE PEFF.PERFITER R.N. EEL TROWEL Fw sR j5 II I II J! ` EL L ORAw AND rKWT LB. InEE SiIdICTUR/•L! p q )d$u t ORA ANDDRA OWTTPI LB. i 3 i (dLOe LF� RER F ATON ISULTIO SOUTH ELEVATION .$ nIN cN • •I®" EfUIILDING SECTION I I 1 i f Is 0 m A JAMS .L ^.I / RID. ''''''i , 7;::fir` �' (fl . I/t{ 1u EAVE 'II1II I IIi iI I �)VI" !N" DOOR WD�TMB ArAIIIdLK ONE •�� /1 IIi 'I F^Yw �DOWEPOrt.M. I •II SECTION El )11 —{GR/E L. �Li NORTH ELEVATION DOOR SCHEDULE al DOOR FRAME REMARKS f DOOR WIDTH 1EIGHT THICK TYPE MAT'L FNISF!•LABEL MAT'L FNIBN . O 0 ; l 0 I NA. A ST PT -- 11•I PT LOCK SET.PF-RATR eTWPN6$ OT D LH PACs Sll PT ELECLOCK.SET. OEATHE 6 ROOF RI FETAL dLLDSY. If Eli FACT OR PT MANUAL OPERATION 4111. i -,�O.I RAKE FASCIA AND I ERN ' " ' D SE- FACT -- OIL PT MANI AC OPERATCN i I 6 3'-0" T..T.. 13/e" A HI FT -- HY H LOCK CET.YFAT1ffR STRING$ 11 .4 PETALBOPr..TT. 1�l [ ! ��L[UP DCTCR , { TOOOrwr c TYPICAL $METAL MELDII•�STANDAR.MAN DOOR d) V 1 LN!TYPIf>L �1 9.' DOOR SCHEDULE ADEREVIATICNE 0 / I •I, PA F.11.01, HOLL :PLIED RC. Q e`TTL STEEELL =ILI WEST ELEVATION "_I gW ".'--------i(.RADE LFE W ^ Z J q 7 Wu. I T IFA>GIA W l�'QV7 I� I GDaI TROT I 1i- V 2 �J9�I0 9 o o o0 role D00R� Imp 11P DDDRI— I u V L9Cr III, Zw ou I , TCMAL dIILDIY I 1— TT — S A10.0 HOLLOW Z= METAL MAN DOOR .6 x 1 FM SHED �1 FLOOR LINE___ EL ETV EL mSD' / `FADE LINE 4SLOPE o FAST ELEVATION UP TO ASPHALT S PAN. auLE•w-.r-0• D.•e sD DooRn Jamie'AMCD*1 YST IYE ROMPETT C* 3 AND CONCRETE STOOP I C E'NiE@10Ya TIONOLD61P2,NC H Job No.... Lu0.20ll.2ol.«,. (NI • • j 8 N' / Ier g Cale/j J / x t/ 7i7 ' l r' / II" ` fIVIY MAPF �P T— "-------tls51 ra ecxe d® ///1 Ir Ia s"• ❑ I �s A� ASSE55OR'S PARCEL No: 16230591210E B a° i / 'all ss j LEGAL- 1 I / yII I/ ,,/ BUILDING AREA' - BLDG. El ..-+-P� _-F 4 • 99mC SF TwAa PETER PORN.OF THECTON CTOUEx IS RTERNORM OF 146 u5 EAST.r 1.11 .� `—'/ ,{ II As CITY LOWS, atl Sic 1001FF wneHOGraa DexwDeD OT.aNON , I f SLAB ELEVATION FOLLOWS, ,bC -I I // / I QUARTTER6 AT NE rm THE.T al OF eAro ewr.olrEer M LA D o1 NANO WARN ae-006"EAST ALTO THE SOUTH LSE OF St. P-0 N y�� I I ' 1 2' NSDNISION A DISTANCE OP 0eva FEET,TO NE NEE PONY eN;.y'00 I z OFDEGDNNE 10a / / I THENCE NORM mI.OA'B"EAST.A DISTANCE OF%a5a FEET: BLDG.'I' / TIERCE SOUTH oD•mav EAST,A DISTANCE OF au FEET,To •U W C J I/ / 9 `� NE EAST LINE CP DND UOINVI I0 .-I C .I `r, T.IEICE DWDI mI.00•�5"TEST ALDIG SAID EAST LEE.A (tl.M 2 a m DISTANCE W Sea.a GET TONE SNSlAeT CORNER 6 SAIDeueopneica ^ •IN T.F BLDG.'�' 'mA 2 II SUBDIVIDER A DISTANCE OF LOSS FEET.NORTH CEPIN..OT,NONG ,RAMC T.TIREeos�+r g i o �I OP BEGN N W (4._ b),../4-11 a I e%EPT NE TEST am FEET THEREOF. • ..Ew / , N H p PROJECT NARRATIVE: µ I -S SD•m3'.10'E — L. T. � ASPHALT PAVING I g EOM WATER DETENTION IS RECTIFIED BY T.CITY CP RFMON FOR THIS PROJECT.ALL �f>" ———— / - : DEFACE.TER WILL DE DPAN.D ON SITE AID SF WIRATED,WHICH.WILL NOT...ACT WATER a EDE �_ OCLNSTFEEL !FILTRATION POND WILL PROVIDE WEE.TER TrYY'REA PER '1� NEW i '� I TNa-rIr SURFAGTOTER OIALITY �E m'ITY o Re�w.E` 'Po�LuiNre eTiRiLTRR'�AiIOI nN A180 BE aalrEN aleaee Diamoea T'E "( T/ ' ROOF MAN FOOTING DRAM wu DE CONVEYED TO NE ONEITE I ALTRATION POLO ZI I� SEPARATeLY.1!E DRIVEW6Y TOLL DE YCYED TO dLLaW NEET ROW 6TE BTORT W.tTER `�S - P.C.TO T.FILTER STRIP.!REFER To REPORT FOR MORE PFOFetATKNJ RIPACING uDT:.ELaEo / ]m m Im ,�LATCH R¢w I'm �- SITE DATA- !. NN.,PAVNG MNE.ESE q L I J !VEGETATION GREEN r F I mS *ENT am ry ERE°WLm0VERKh. 0031 SIT TA B N PERCENT S SURFACE ARE. .S AC 'I I s .. A P �. 'T.O T`P I re -------- -- amcf�r+ra+AccessROAD , , �PORTN AG ASPHALT GENERAL NOTES: STORM DRAINAGE m TO RERAN L ALL OD.AND MATERIALS WALL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH NE LATEST EDIT.OF DE CT'CP 0- M'01b'B e6.»• RENT. E Ta.iSTASDARD SPECIFICATIONS 00 MOO R/AFDSS STANDARD'FEMME...LATEST Q Z 2. EOON.SITE...ART.TOPOGRAPHIC SF1B1AT101 AND UTILITIES ARE DARED ON A NR.EY e BY.EDRRNIC STEADMAN I ASSOCIATES,PA DATED ELY 2000. z > ACOPP CP TES.APPRO.ED PLAITS MAT BE ON THE J05 SITE STENEER C'OHSTRCTION IS I N PROGRESS. ACCESS RO COIMT A. ALL DTCR1 DRA..CE P41K1N2'EM SHAL L LL BE CONSTRUCTED N ACCORDE.E WITH THESE AO PLANS.Are DEVIATION FR T.EDE FLANS LL mama APPROVAL FRET THE OWNER S o PARTIAL DRAINAGE PLAN llllo,� APPRnVP.D OM P WA ENG.ER AD APFROMMATE PASEO AGENCIESIIIIIII` 6. IT SHALL DE T.SOLE RESPONSIBILITY CP THE CONTRACTOR TO EVIAN STREET HUE AD ANY I OTTER RELATED PER.PRIOR TO ANT COOTRUGT N AC NTY. W f' D.D IST.UTILITYON LOCATIONS AIR:AP%Jnw AL TE CELT.IT SHALL DE NE MRACTORS V_IRSP 0.115.ITT TO VERIFY LOCATIONS A DEPTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. W U T. �or �NOTED THE FOLL1. A PV ON T.PLAN.eTom1 GRAN as ea+rtam SELLER PIE e.LALL BE 0 1 C.C-CMIe O •mU TO SECTION S-Ol➢QIl T STANDARDePECFICATIOND. a. �, a MEE-NIW-DENNTY POUYER.TLENE DUAL WALL CQAGATED PPE WITH AN N,EGRALLY III IIFORM,D100TN N Tom IRaIlE14 R Max HTe OF AANO TT.D PROVIDE PLC W C.ENECT I D ALL PIPE DDD0N:SHALL DE AP.TEE F•FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE(IE.PAC,STIP OR ADS] V 3 BE TOTALLED AID N OPERATION MDR TO OR N COIVCTON WAN -1 0 J 0 CONSTRUCTION ACTVITY MEEBS THE ACTIVITY EXCEEDS NE CAPACITY AND INTENT OF T. 0 N 1 �IP� EROSIONOEDSENTATION 03.070I-FACILITY OR WLESS 03.1006E APPRO.D DY TIE CITY. ^ }.EGIYY I0. -F.TRATION COOLED ADroR FILTER STREET SHALL BE CONSTRICTED,BEDDBD OR YEDED IL ROOF DCLNOPNTTKITLSE N OPERATION PRIOR TO OR N CONVICTION WITH ASPECT PAVNG THE VEGETATION N THE Z FOOTING ORAN FILTER STRIP MOT DIE EDTABLISIED. O u S DCWSMIiTJ.ENNOUf • E ALL REHIRED STORM DRANKf FACILITIES MOT DE CCNDTRCTED AID N OPERATION PSaN ~ / EXIST CONTOUR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW PAVNG MILERS UTERUS.APPROVED BY T.CITY CP "z= —1 E0]GORTM RE TON IS RE..DEFERMENT. i W T D.ALL STORM DRAM AND DELWI Nf CLEANOIITD.ALL BE EMENDED TO FEIGNED CRUDE, �/ AND CLEANERS N PAVED ARE.SHALL DE NTT.WITH TRAFFIC BEAR.COVERS • B.EIPOSKM/SP.DSENTATION AND POI.LITTION CCNIISJL MEANRES SHALL BE PROVIDED, C 1 MANTAIED AND/OR AS NECESSARY.BY TE CONTRACTOR WEL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. R. SITE PLAN AU.FFORTAT]ON Mailer DOCNIENT euLE•P.]am•-m" ID 7.!E]CLaSivE PIM I'Y Pk0 OP PA OFIO ENAMOR/3 TEO0ICI.OGEO.PC. ; ©01PTR10Hr]002 L\IOA,.LII.IIF.INI OR1 — - - See I.MNOL Hi ...• -_. 'l 9 T23N R5E E 1/2 2S -- CS ., i I -- I 4th St. NE /VI St.-{ 1----- 1 1 C 4 A I R—8 I L Li__.tiit--i ____Iiii. . -------.1 JNE pid- Pl.. - fill -..4 R—10 P. R—8 CS R—10(P) - -ii 1- 7-...- g 1 1-b-1 _., E .IR— 14:NE 2nd St. • 7 R M H —7-7- ___, _,. /j _ • ILP) _ w --- i i ..1._=. ----: e'__1 1....JR1,a% (6) e) . SITE. j R M HI Rol, , .......,-.----m E.-3 El 1 i t... _, . . --------. -----1 1 9 -.11 t----..i',-- ' 1 . 11-111/1-1. /-----\ R M H 1 . ---7-\_. 1 i I -0 1 [ I is*, , i • RC(P) / / / ,' >-R L 84111/11111 -i „ ks'41:47418,11 1 7-77---- ------ ; G5 - 21 T23N R5E E 1/2 i? ,11,444,0 _ ONIN .4. ----Renton tty!Amite 14800 F5 Zpg cAL usawn • 7 70" 03/15/02 16 T23N R5E E 1/2 5316 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: June 27, 2002 To: Tracy Coleman/Community Services From: Lesley Nishihira/Development Planningr(lr� Subject: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage LUA-02-052,CU-H,ECF This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Deters-ination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Ha, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on July 2, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report is enclosed. Please contact me, at (425)430-7270, if you have any questions. dnsmemo •• .•. Nob. i ,„•::. • i . . ...•,,,,, , ;•.,•,• ., ,,,•.,,.,„ , ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION&PUBLIC HEARING }n,,l;.; POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE LUA-02-052,CU.1,ECF The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review for the construction of a 9,909 squaw foot building Intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage butding.The building would be located • ' adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops Ina vacant area that is currently dazed for stockpiling.The facility would utilize and further Improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE el Street The structure la proposed at one-stou In height(approximately 22 feet)and would be ' apre•fabdcaled metal building.Location:South of NE21'Street East of Monroe Avenue NE. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC) HAS DETERMINED ' THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • . I Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24,2002.Appeals, • must be glad in writing together with the required$75.00 applldUon fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner era governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 41410.8.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtalnid from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)480-5510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Connell Chamber'cm; • the seventh floor of City Hag,on July 2.2002 at 9:00 All to consider the proposed conditional use permit if the„! • Environmental Detuminatlon Is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of Una public hearing. '• 9da_IP fII ,de7'l Jam^ r• y .� R-g 11�> 1 • , J i. R-10 • ...CSR-3 ) - 'ar a,a n p i - utx RsOi susu 1fPil • I . ri, , "—"I_� RHH tVii,4 1-+� rg��- E I • RAJ ! i` }`a". I • :, I Y J)1•nrl„ '•A _ a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT'is i 4'. SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7270. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION -:1,i^''' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. . ' • • • •' MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC ` CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES L • JUNE 29, 2003 • wv -sd'— .v`rs- - I, E. I,I ,hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on -TS\ANk.. -7 t 220L Signed: .... ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the to of Washington residing )L4-6. r‘ ,on the r�0 4. i.. day of ?ft,n o. MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 • TRANSMITTAL Pacific Engineering Technologies . • DATE May 29,2002 1300 DEXTER AVE.N.SUITE 100 Seattle,WA 98109 (206)281-7500 FAX(206)281-4611 TO Ms.Tracy Coleman FAX Number: 425-433-6603 CompanylAddress City of Renton Phone 425-430-6623 Community Services Number: • Renton City Hall 5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Project Number 2K114.00 Project Name enton Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Pages Faxed including transmittal We are Sending it: Attached /1 Under Separate Cover❑ Faxed ❑ Quantity Date Description 1 Boiler plate revisions. 1 Ea. PMT's Remarks: ' For your bidding information and SEPA submittal. Please call if you have any questions. 0 .Bredal,A.I.A. Associate Architect• ' o F:12K Jobs 101 to 20012k114 Renton Police Evidence BIdg1TRANSMITTAL coleman6.doc 5/29/02 • : • •1 4 ;: . . . . . ' . ' . ., • l'' - iiimml " ,,);*,„,; ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OFAN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • . . ,:'1, ' . • : 4,': • POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE , • . .. . LUA-02-052,CU-HIECF . ., • The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot .. building Intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further Improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE 2nd Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height(approximately 22 feet)and would be .. • a pre-fabricated metal building. Location: South of NE 27 Sb-eet;East of Monroe Avenue NE. . ‘ . . , . THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW;I:POMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE'A.SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. • . ' ' 1, . • Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24,2002. Appeals . . . . . must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton . • City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. l'' ' ' .• ,. • A Public Hearing will beheld by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on ' .. „ :. the seventh floor of City Hall,on July 2,2002 at 9:00 AM to ConSidet the proposed conditional use permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. * . ; , ., ; • • . : . . • . • • • • - ILI..9 ram tug x la . 1-I Ii•a+. 4th St. IP Fs -qcs j . . ....",.. . :„...........,..____,;..:,m ., 1 r it ist.rmr_i.---.. L. ii:•.11. 1...1-.0-1 1.-1 • . :, .= -; 1 • 7 CS.1, --"—' :--I • .. • .3-ia Tr .• R-8.,',:,;,,i•••; -1• . .••••• . R-10 1 I,:q0;1''':'108 R-101CP) ----1 -- ' .• ..• . A •'•'r M • 1 :30 • 'NE 2nd Si.'.1(!j!i • '71), 1.,,f. 7ta7,77-7:77" RMH ;;• Ira- • - • .:• . • I (13 . :; • .. . li ... , • —id viz .• • • : .. rl'• b" I 1. ...' . . . •"•(:;• • P• • ...'“ ''\ • • • ... 00 I . • ,: . . . ,...,.. ... . . . . .. ••• ••• • ' . . .f.... 'If ._ . : • ‘ . . ; • ; •i i ..1' RMH ... ..., • ". . - •,:.•' .. i p't.:'i • ..., ... . . . ••.1 .., i.••• . ,•...,4 • ;-' -10 I l• • • ',.•• 1 : I.: 1 ,: .:) . .,- , :''. . 1•44,14,. .„...,,t ,., ''• • ..04 rilakt %.) :n1 RC(P)/ ':' :•:'.I4 _. e 14 oe • A :.-; . • 3. . ..,. • • 4.7,4? • .,. ..,, .,.... ,Rap). •.,,,, ,,,,mr/ .4, .4.4r,..;,444. . . , . . : q .. ' • . .. . • ...•..,. ., . .. • ••• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT.THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES DIVISION AT,(425)430-7270. . • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1 .''' ' : . ''Pleisetnaudellie*6,10fNUMBERVhenfoillifittailiiiifieilleldelitifiaatiditi• z:: ,.;•1' ::1 • - ;:i i • . , . _— NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. POLICE STORAGE FACILITY LUA.02-052,CU-H,ECF Environmental review for construction of police evidence vehicle storage building. Loc tion: South of NE 2nd St., East of Monroe Ave. NE. Appeals of t e environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtai ed from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Herin will be held bythe Renton HearingExaminer at his regular meetingin the Council 9 9 Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on July 2, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the conditional use permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Publication Date: June 10,2002 Account No. 51067 dnspub ;y —110 CITY APF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Greggimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor gg June 6,2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on June 4,2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE, LUA-02-052,CU-H,ECF The applidant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for:the4construction of a 9,909 square foot building.intended for use as apolice„evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located _ :.:T. k.: adjacent�to the-existing.City'of flentan mainteciarice=shops�in a°vacant area that is:currentlyyutilized for stockpiling: The facility would utilize:and:further improve an"existing private roadway which extends south . . ._. from NE 2"d Street. The structura is proposed,aton,.e-story in height(approximately 22 feet)and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. Location: Soutii'of=.NE�2"d;,Street, East of Monroe Avenue NE. Appeals of the environmental determination must`Eelredin'"vwriting on or before 5:00 PM June 24,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75`0,0 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City.of Renton, _ 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055 Appealsitpythe Etaminer,are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional;information regarding the appeal,process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-651 o. If you have questio s, please call me at(425)`:430-7g7o. For the Environmental Review Committee, - , traini Lesley Nishihira ` -0 Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) • US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure • RENTON 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 agencyletterr AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-052,CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton; Community Services PROJECT NAME: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further improve an existing private roadway which • extends south from NE 2 Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height(approximately 22 feet) and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section of:Non-Si nificance.is issued under WAC197-11-340.!-BecansedtlierKagencies'of.:-"" ' `` - - >>- * �nsdretion Ynay be involved,the lead agency will not act ion this proposal for fourteen i;�4)"days:.=:f -�: - • • Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from - - the Renton-City Clerk's Office; (425)430-6510. - - __ _: _ -: --__ _ - . PUBLICATION DATE: June 10,2002 DATE OF DECISION: June 04,2002 SIGNATURES: c y7oZ regg ,erm d uni or DATE Departm of anningBuilding/Public Works Ji Shephe£ rLminLor ' . DA E munity Services Department 0,1• Lee i e=er, Ire Chie(---21‘1. DATE Ren on Fire Department • DNSSIGNATURE CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: June 6,2002 To: Tracy Coleman/Community Services 11° From: Lesley Nishihira/Development Planning efil't Subject: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage LUA-02-052,CU-H,ECF This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review'Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee,on June 4,2002, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. .__The=City of Renton-ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the F x- -.environment:�-An='EnvironmentalsImpact-Statement (EIS) is not:required=vnder CW 43.21C:030(2)(c): •M u y` This`decision-was made by the.ERC undeethe authority Of Section-4-6-6;1Renton Municipal'Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:.Hearing Examiner, City-of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055: Appeals to-the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on July 2, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed conditional use permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Please contact me,at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. dnsmemo CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-052, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton; Community Services PROJECT NAMO Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility DESCRIPTION F PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of aO9,909 square foot building intended for use as a poll a evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE 2 Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height (approximately 22 feet) and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION TTE: June 10, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: June04, 2002 SIGNATURES: liffirerm c�rfiln? IYaorDATEq70 2, De mof annin /Buildin /Public Works P9 9 --Th L C7.0.2______ SJiShepherd, dmini rator DA E munity Services Department /67 c...-i Lee e9 er, Fire Chie DATE Ren on Fire Department DNSSIGNATURE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE { JUNE 4, 2002 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief • From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: ! Tuesday, June 4, 2002 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor-Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Elle Rain Place Preliminary Plat (Fiala) LUA-02-047,PP, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Preliminary Plat approval for the 11-lot subdivision of a 1.78-acre site. The residential plat would create lots intended for the construction of detached single family homes — lots ranging in size from '4,519 square feet to 8,959 square feet. The existing residence located on new Lot 11 is proposed to remain within the plat. A single family home is under construction on new Lot 10 under separate building permits. The project includes the 'nstallation of utilities and the dedication of a 34-foot wide residential street, Monroe Court NE, which would extend north from NE 17t Place and would terminate in a cul-de-sac. Also, the applicant is requesting a modification from the required 42 feet to a 34 foot wide right-of-way. The site is bounded on the west by a power transmission line easement and on the south and east by single family residential development. Location: North of NE 17 Street and Monroe Avenue NE. Police Evidence Vehicle Storage (Nishihira) LUA-02-052, CU-H,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The structure is proposed at one-story in height (approximately 20 feet) and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities qre estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of grading in order to match existing grades. Location: South of NE 2" Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE. St. Paul Ministries Church (Jordan) LUA-02-048,SA-A, ECF The applicant is req esting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit approval to convert the existing Roxy Theater into a church for church sessions and other church related uses. The subject site is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation and Downtown Core Area. Location: 502 South 3` Street. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson,EDNSP Administrator A Pietsch,EDNSP Director J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner L.Rude,Fire Prevention ® J.Medzegian,Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney ® STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE June 4, 2002 Project Name: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Applicant: City of Renton; Community Services File Number: LUA-02-052, ECF, CU-H Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The building would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops in a vacant area that is currently utilized for stockpiling. The facility would utilize and further improve an existing private roadway which extends south from NE 2nd Street. The structure is proposed at one-story in height (approximately 22 feet) and would be a pre-fabricated metal building. The subject site is relatively flat and does not contain any designated sensitive or critical areas. Grading activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards for preparation of foundation, paving and utility improvements and to match existing grades. In addition to the installation of utilities and two parking spaces, the construction of a bio-swale infiltration pond on the south side of the building is proposed for storm water purposes. Project Location: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE Exist. Bldg.Area gsf: N/A Proposed New Bldg.Area: 9,909 sf Site Area: 222,844 sf (5.12-acres) Total Building Area gsf: 13,555 sf c RECOMMEND TION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). 4th St. I I. . -I I( I NE t'z St.I _ i II- CFP CA _tit 7L_ _ rTN 3rd Pl.; _i - R-10 o -I - R-8 CS R-10(P) -I- ---R=L1-10�- -4 r 1 ' NE 2nd St. ri - RMH ----:T- IN, t IL(P) , 7: :E /! RMH 1-11-11.1471S:s‘ .Project Location a RTa IE' ercrpt P i , P r_/.. k City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviroi ital Review Committee Staff Report " POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE___CILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 4 2002 Page 2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. D. MITIGATION MEASURES Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 24, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee v4th: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. ercrpt • City of Renton P/8,'PW Department Enviroi ital Review Committee Staff Report POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE_- = ,CILITY LUA-02-052,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 4,2002 Page 3 of 3 Advisory Notes'to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Light Industrial with a Public Use suffix (IL-P) on the City's Zoning Map and Center Institution (CI) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. The proposed use would be considered a government facility and as such requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the application has been amended from Administrative Site Plan review to a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. 3. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Fire Prevention 1. Fire Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. 2.. The prelimin ry fire flow is 2,750 gpm. 3. One fire hydnt is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to be located within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width with an inside turning radius of 25 feet and an outside radius of 45 feet. 5. Fire Department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to provide an approved vehicle turnaround. 6. Please provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids, or hazardous chemicals to be stored or used on site. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The site is presently served by existing roadways through the City Shops facility. 2. Street improvements are required, including paving of access roads/driveways, curbs and gutters. All improvements are required to comply with Fire Department regulations and provide adequate storm water/surface water drainage improvements. 3. Traffic Mitigation Fees are not applicable to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an exdsting 12-inch water main located at the north side of the site. 2. The site is located within the 565 pressure zone and Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. 3. There are twos existing fire hydrants that may be counted towards the required fire protection of the building. 4. Hazardous materials stored on site shall require containment facilities for both the materials and for spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to collect any spilled material or floor wash-doWn to a mid-building floor drain via closed drainpipe to a storage vault outside of the building. This vault must prcjvide access for a pump out vehicle on a scheduled basis for removal/disposal. 5. A water meter shall be installed to furnish domestic water to the site for cleaning purposes. 6. An operating permit and facility inspections may be required depending on the quantity and variety of hazardous materials contained on site. 7. Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main located in the City Shop area north of the site. 2. No sanitary sewer service is proposed for this building. 3. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Level I drainage report was provided with the application and found to be acceptable. 2. Surface Water System Development Charges do not apply to City-owned properties. Plan Review—General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete, three copies of the drawings, two copies ofthe drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the 6h floor customer senJice counter. ercrpt .,,,, ppq.� ® �mwuri ■ °o-tt ,�n_,Ihd.'0'Rr:, sagojouq ji,¢roa �, ',... BIIoI. dII'� 1 .WI7'W 3FTv21019 31DIP13't 4' '.1.• Tv""1""'" ,.H urt .d......4m, O — I P4V1.I iLI9 sonod N01Nal t b, �� ,a ,A� it V I Ns 1g 1n g g g1ai lit ,1 1 4 li h EN ill. . — 1 i 1 P ' 1, y3 g gO h 14 6 • i e if r rill rg I g [ 1 li g 1 n pp 1 i 1 i Hil of 8itll 11/ /lig Ili /1 II P ii 011144111i . , a pFgpF ii2 RIM AI II ill i`/lqQsQsqI 4 1 i , II i1/ 411g ilit I . _ - '. a-- 4-1 -7 u1 Al d d 5 gi 1 g 1 ill by ii <6 ai —. 5 s , !:I,O F; — - ,h, t g 1n4 ii? Ill 11 • i pi k.1,! ii o il I it ....01 . it --1 1 t _ . t? 1 tri lie P§" 1 , „ . .1,11 k i Y 1 \ ii i 6 iiMI1ilisill! B '. ..‘\ s -. --. ...1\\ \ CT atlo.l No11VYM l7 ,j "° } iI E 1 E $ s 6 $ i1 •- .ltttt 4WlMNL jii- — — ___Th .' r— a - I I �mII. 1 rI a I • i it A ir[ y 61 I I ! I 1 I 1 d■yi� q ON YILy{�1 p C 8 a I. 1 i I . . a= F • Y R Mp'dnt ' I I , lr--rli ; I I DIJ it I, E_ I_il. q 4 � I iii \--- - __ JIL gl i$ ,Ni.--- Y.,, - - - - it i g 6 g . .g !3g 5 , i 1J ica+.a. OUN4 -, 1 R71"IR►`--- --1------ _---- g it _ .� -H ., . , ts‘ -—5 i r 4; - -44 - e { I �g pill Q g, --� r 1111 C 4 g i! r g gl I x 1 -IL-- --=-= _____, pi li li iti F. i pi li ii ,. , , 11 3 Tipp i :ill 1111,11 04 11 r ! 1 ii ii 111 hill l'AsIgi 1 g iiiiiiiiiiloil A I 1 1 F lii ii lipli 1 011 i ' 1' 'I F 141 1 4 11101" 11' 1 . 41 i 1 I 3 1 as ill p i ii 91 Pe i i 1. Itiq. i.11 pg 1 6 i if 11 • P � ii III ia� it rg Pri wP itil�{ in : • >01s ii 111 .49 ii `� ' Jul1 i 14 PI '4 g 4 1 1. i OM 0 11 0 0 i f0 f . „ hi IQ 1 ri 1111 ill 4 li 12 Pi 4 ig 11 i ghlOi ii i .4~ ig 11 it _ _ ; h 0 Or itt I$1 ili d 1141 ; li ; i : i. 1 ,.z I, 10. 1 .... - k'-' ra- ��^d �" �} �� Yor. rwl �AYf]1Rdl inn a Retat route Knee cieaNaae (x� Pacific �^.- r; i Y vENrcLE bT Paci�rtY A Engineering '= x . p�� � Technologies ""MEE waan Sul, t o... .= I ® ' ' ' i . t ( -- ---e 0 IP 1, - IIIIIIIii 4 r 7 4 1 E IRil IN Dill --i---° ___. �� �} �� o ��l pa i -C H----------- _- _,_ I� Pia___® 211 ip if1IP I / IiIi1 ; C4L I� Pail ;;; 4 11 L 1 P i 4•44i4 4-� �i 1 O it oil 1 § • 11 , II R I i i i ttit 11 og:, 0 \ � � i E. e w S II g Fri,., ' � I I p 1 1 4 II urn IIINTON POLICE[YIDS.= ELEVATIONIS Pacific tie JAIN Mr.[ WA�enm. aa-i W• VISIIcLE SfOlrnaE PA ILITY iT Il "°'� Engineering " E2)mRwac� 7eohnoiogies e_>21 n.�. v E.' .) T23N R5E E 1/2 r2 ] �S - CS -- `' 4th St. NE it:a St.1 r--- I 1 C CA] R-8 LJ - CJ _ l 1 1 1 — C NE prd Pl. --� - - R—1 0 o CS R-10j(P) ---T-�__—. 1 1 _--J NE 2nd St. — R=L10 — ._. 1 �,�r�--,'- RMH _ 1 � i r111 7.. -77_I ` L --- _ :_ _ — ILP) ._ arm, / T c..62\44 ---) ---- (---O.:L_-7—_--._ 6 i \�i,: I .1TI ..� ________E- ---- �I I L N SATE RMH _I._. . 1-3 E' RTs 1 I AEI w - ---- j-I=�I 1 \ 'i I I I Ri-01 I I I it, __ 1 , RMH ► )_I I ; , ..,.., , , 4,„_ ., . ... -, ,. .,__/,/// / ,,,,./\,, ,, ,,d,, ,,,„, RCCP) / / �- \,R._8 �,,l __ .„ cc i f1 . ____ _________ _ cc • RC(P) c: \ //, (;)4 ,,,A*1 , �Iiii- G5 • 21 T23N R5E E 1/2 e ,?, ,,go T �l . 04:11' ZONING ----Renton dity Limit/ 1:4e0o iH `i�J ® ; P/H/PW TSCHIQICAL MAWCSB �� o� 03 � 16 T23N R5E E 1/2 5316 ZONING MAP BOOK A..Nxzi,I.l,...::..: i-•,h rim-1L 19:•r,g i p i:.:::A:,-l':",•o:gE.g_:a-:,i•,i iM.":,•fm-:En1::.:,E:sK::1E::ii::i: a.m:ggE::i;K:ff:4ina:pi::i:1:5s g--nE2--x5---A-t--i.i:1 m,4,.rvA‘;1i:1ro 1l l,a r lk'hout GiM.l_,_r.-,tIC,ngm-Ii-rci-k"A---i.--Vt4gE..n,iaA raIht.1•rVlr-.0-i v:-iA,,t s1 i n1-lA:i•I10 to-i1,.1,lS,E4..rN4Iii'i0 i,rP4.t oI.6 a I R7''-i-1 77— .----1- r.-_-24-6n T2..•-42..40- .' N.:- 1 1'iI,q 5E nr1i1 aV 7'7&7 4 1 ktpubhi,-10.07P,Emiii::::4#:;::;t:.!7.iiiiimmo liptingin'IriTetem#7. iimtpri wit.-, ,k=irmiiri., ,tr:::,,,Ei:.-i!Emiquai asums .;,F„----„, i_To---, . -*ice._....L.L.,-,, , • •;Ik w'-,-Ar_lorliNif 1-.±.----,:tellinig 1-0.411 ,` inkTil,tirg;pli ''''in,.a 15;1111P I a IF IN IOW 11 LjAVIIii gii : im ' wick;iilzio Ar -.owe- :-.1;i41 pi . " Ail!PIIIJII. ..„_„,s. .„,,-,:i:iti i:K:i:K: .4K..'''':KO - , -'- ' •-• /1 ;4- , sum.. ..rea.1 Millintfg101Well IP, .tA \ . iIiIIIREggiaIERNERIg dAl MIEN& It .„''''..,"tilidkailltaVI,.._I A.,4":1,1614.'iii-,.-::.-...1"4:21L.,1291ERWM-*-'-'-5 eiMitijAW.E1111'aA.1' 11' r.:Aldif 44 MIMI& MI i IIMIna V n,16111.!=gZjiisjI;.,:lt, "W /:---, III".- virm tilogin imi -- kt;111111111i141111:=:=ture II i••'-'-'-'--- Al ,ANCrit.:L,:rigt;,cOrit.e,__:,* 'I-r;i 6 '` •a khell ital.:wKiirdiitabii, \kg,it.?=no ma iiv,44.,meEsii_m\ 1 I , ,.-_r-inotp.19,-1-.74-,,mallilip, ._ ___, 2: AMIll arAF4311"='IC/ suriNgi ak .1 11 A'Vilt'7011 ili )tit Ilia iii4"1 si- ri ik It 1 .. 111;"i'T-1 \111141 PIASIT ilifiereirgl . : ntl-R,E Y I ,_ , At .1,1:,,,,,i,•.1 ...ici, , \ daJEK -,C—Allito.z• e.,,' -• ....... I I 1.1 I..... VE-'-'7111U1 1746,71MPIAMI.-VNW MILTAIWIIIIIIISWAOMPFW;., I. SIVIIIWIRSI I IMMO MN -StiLLa.174 NIL 811 IFIti k"13E,_I. Ltje 14111 _ -.1,00.111L-41---, / \ -- 10 ,wi! A , Wait I f Iltipal ____10 righwirt vit lafEiii . ,t,,,a4jsit. t uclip6p 1 "liffrOtt-, -41.1.11'-MO :ATIFill gi.ti til-Z- • '''lil 114111fitgult4011: --1-- ,, L, .44 -- --fm, f AND-21.60r, ,,.4 „, •Z'N&Net'. , ' -----,WAIL i d, et ' w A a bi to 4tra Lip IV r4 ' %to if::' _- - ._7.kifk.. •4 a *ki - --10 ,,,....:._ va,-,1 Al. 'WI'Ir-,,--- r..''Ar- .2.4.iii.1,1-, '- ,22 723N-"s• -1. 23 723N R5E MI_MIJ 4 Ilmr•MIlli,,f elr"Wtrinr. ., ii IpilMr=7":- ire.7.7.. vi.-- (; _ MI - , _ •Imirei&l Li ,oil . • 1 il A4 (6,1%.„1,M,M. .f.w.-2,:='41-1,0•11- - 7 '-----,.11- ' :w14," 0 1 - 1' , 17014-fall 1 agillifiri, % -4, Ir1'7'% 1 Mr,IF!1.21.101--!IF isauki. li '111 witb:1,_,' 'r-.4 0 Nitogt. -11----.1 *mem ,i23 R4E ErSatrif211IttiNnlai moo— .. IL - e. 1 711141X1,14- r 1. Lt: a witi sT11110191.e§)li 825 --- • :;"4 7.4.,p I -••-•--- ---, 'T '''-',. 4.. ','' : I .. .?' 113NR:10 ti .. . 1. ..- , Ai . , v imr"--..-.1■01• 1 /re -WW1 6 Si .Zi ': Ir4 .0 1111111mq vim illpi i 833 ill ' u II I WI 1 !caw I I.•. ,1 :I EISA ft, I . m. uk , i .............. .........._... ------------------------- -.......,-. __........_ IP 11 ) —- -‘ht g wilitAli 22N R4E 661, --. ,..k • i 2 T22N R5E NM11.1111.1111111.1111.1.11MMEIII .MM/UMMIKIN Z.M. .. .,•=mr.'w•.•••••...... . ..—.. - --- BysTimmu, MiXEILlisr_fmmg I CN 1 Center Neighborhood' maps.IFnocrluadldiOt=yreDgsuraiteitsons sit! Appendixrly RC Resource Conservation Districts, please see RMC 4-3. R-I Residential 1 du/ac I cs I Center Suburban. R-5 Residential 5 du/ao I-7 Center Downtown' (P) Publicly owned R-8 Residential 5 du/ac I COR.1 Center Office Residential Renton City Limits COMMERrAll --.-Adjacent City Limits WIN Residential Manufactured Homes R-10 Residential 10 du/ac I CA I Commercial Arterial'. siss Book Pages Boundary R-14 Residential 14 du/ac I Co I Commercial Office KROLL as-1 Residential Multi-Family Infill FT Convenience Commercial R/4-N Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center INDUSTRIA/ PAGE# PAGE RM-C 'Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center I IA I Industrial - Heavy SECT/TOVM/RANGE RM-U Residential Multi-Family Urban Center" I IS I Industrial - Medium INDEX , IL I Industrial - Light . ._ t a CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: May 29, 2002 To: Lesley Nishihira From: Paul Lumbert, Plan Review • Subject: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage LUA-02-052 EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 12-inch water main, located at the north side of the site. Site is located in Zone 2 of the aquifer. There are 2 existing fire hydrants that may be counted towards the required fire projection of the proposed building. 565 pressure zone. SEWER — There is an existing 8-inch sewer main, located in the City Shop area north of the site. STORM — STREETS - Site is served by existing roadways in the City Shop site. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. Hazardous materials stored on site requires containment facilities for both the materials and spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to collect any spilled material or floor wash-down to a mid-building floor drain, via closed drain pipe to storage vault outside of building. This vault to have access to pump out vehicle on a scheduled basis for removal/disposal. 2. Water rrheter installed to furnish domestic water to site for cleaning purposes. 3. An operating permit and facility inspections may be required, depending on the quantity and variety of hazardous materials contained on site. 4. The water system development charge (SDC) fees do not apply to City-owned properties. SANITARY SEWER 1. No sanitary service is proposed for this building. 2. The sanitary sewer (SDC) fees do not apply to City-owned properties. SURFACE WATER ( 1. Level One drainage report has been provided. 2. The surface water (SDC) fees are not required on City-owned properties. TRANSPORTATION 1. Improvements required, such as asphalt driveways/access paving, curbs and gutter, must meet Fire Department codes/regulations and also drainage design concerns. 2. Traffic mitigation fees are not required for this project (City-owned). PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. cc: Neil Watts PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #20(,' yEDEVELOI1MENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP NVIRO NTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑ OTHER r APPLICANT: CS OR K 1O /(1Acy COL ) RECEIVED OM J lV 5/I 5/O2 . JOB ADDRESS: 52 2 - S-1-• wo# (date) NATURE OF WORK: COrl'uC j 1O?S (Orrei►.L=t!C• n I GREEN# PI ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION c�. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED . ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review// dated / � �J 0 PARENT PIDH(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID/ k l0 2. s -i 2 3 ❑ King Co.Tax Acctl(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are ubject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. • The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER 96002 14/ �.0Gq / . 22z)844 t 16 ), Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER '2iUS th4p r s•t— Joint Use Agreement(METRO) 1 Local Improvement District o11 LY I F C(*)144 FC-TNC s.Er.( Traffic Benefit Zones • $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$1,105/unit x • Mobile home dwelling unit$885/unit in park Apartment, Condo$66$/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial; $0.154/sq. ft. of property(not less than$1105.00)x G l PROF, — I Yell?•'T V=eoil Sp G Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter t2,soo GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partiaally Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$760/unit x Mobile home dwelling'#nit$610/unit x Apartment, Condo$45$/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.106/sq. ft. of property(not less than$760.00)X C 11 ape r D : ITT ' diYl QpC.1- REDEVELOPMENT.CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$525/unit x All other properties$0.183/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$525.00) C I VEmPf k%12011 sl> PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ • mo kuthori & DAT rai N *If su ject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. EFFECTIVE January 4,2001 �_ I CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J. Fesser5' SUBJECT: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage,LUA-02-052,SA-A Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the legal description as noted on the site plan for the above referenced submittal and find it satisfactory as presented. However, it is noted that the legal description included in the title report dated November 3, 1981 (and a pat of this submittal) is not a description of the subject property. Also noted is that the two City of Renton zoning drawings that were included in the submittal, and are used to show a representation of the subject property, are in error. Both of these drawings,by coloring or dashed line, include a 30' strip adjoining on the west of said property, but this strip is not a part of the subject property. \H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\POLICEEV.doc City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public L..__As ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:P a �L5 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2002 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON,COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT MANAGER: LESLEY NISHIHIRA PROJECT TITLE: POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE WORK ORDER NO: 78980 LOCATION: South of NE 2"d Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE SITE AREA: 222,844 SF BUILDING AREA(gross): 9,909 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The structure is proposed at one-story irk height and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of grading to match existing grades. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the 1Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information lImpacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources I Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet v�=1 • _'/ 0, 4/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS \j/LeAk 11-0 161-210 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 740 igo,e4, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional Information is need•�,o properly assess this proposal. ,A0A(;), Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • • City of Department of Planning/Building/Public Vl____ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: _Ons vrrj' raid fiGPS COMMENTS DUE: MAY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2002 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON,COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT MANAGER: LESLEY NISHIHIRA PROJECT TITLE: POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE WORK ORDER NO: 78980 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED LOCATION: South of NE 2nd Street; East of Monroe Avenue NEIvIA B 1 3 SITE AREA: 222,844 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 9,909 SF 2002 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site PlarPkikri l®rE1htiSION construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The structure is proposed at one-story in height and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of grading to match existing grades. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor . Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ' / We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,r> / 6 o Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: May 16, 2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: (1...c__)Don Erickson SUBJECT: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage, SE 2nd P1 &Olympia Ave NE; LUA-02-052, SA-A,ECF The applicants are proposing the construction of a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on a City owned 5.1-acre site south of the Renton Public Shops site in the Highlands area. The new facility would be located on the northern portion of this parcel next to the City of Renton shop site. Although the site is generally flat there are steep slopes on its perimeter. The City's shops currently use a portion of it for stockpiling material. The site is designated Center Institution on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned Industrial Light(IL) with a P-suffix. 1. Intent of the Land Use Designation This is described in Objective LU-V below: Objective LU-V: Assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the development and expansion of facilities to serve the post secondary educational and health care needs of the area and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. Although the reference here is to post secondary educational and health care facilities the intent is to ensure adequate land and infrastructure for all governmental facilities. This was the reason that this area was designated Center Institution in the first place. 2. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policies Policy LU-240. Major functions of the police should be centralized in or near the downtown. Policy LU 241. Satellite police facilities may be located outside of the downtown. Policy LU 305. The design of buildings and surrounding environment should be compatible with surrounding recent urban designs. 3. Areas of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed new police evidence building is not a major function of the Police Department that needs to be centralized. Its location at a satellite facility outside of downtown makes considerable sense since this basically is a vehicle storage facility. The proposed use will also be compatible with other municipal facilities at the City Shops site next door. 4. Areas of apparent inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan Clearly the proposed use is not a post-secondary educational facility or health care needs facility. It however,is a municipal facility and is compatible with other municipal uses allowed in the IL Zone. 5. Recommendation Approve this apparent Hearing Examiner Conditional Use and ensure that the design of the proposed new building is compatible with its surrounding environment(Policy LU-305). cc: Rebecca Lind H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility.doc\d �•a City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public hvancs C ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \- ( COMMENTS DUE: MAY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-052,SA-A, CF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2002 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON,COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT MANAGER: LESLEY NISHIHIRA PROJECT TITLE: POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE WORK ORDER NO: 78980 LOCATION: South of NE 2"d Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE SITE AREA: 222,844 SF BUILDING AREA(gross): 9,909 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage building. The structure is proposed at one-story in height and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of grading to match existing grades. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing : Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation_ - Environmental Health i Public Services / Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 5 CP5 Prinnuall • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. C P ait/r4 S—1 q-0 2-- Signature of 9 Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 (r1,,�� O� CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE. May 14, 2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage, E 2nd St MITIGATION ITEMS; r'/Pc A fire mitigation fee of$5,152.68 is required based on $.52 per square foot o the building square footage. Livw ;:,..R.)7/ FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: AN 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2750 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 3. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:�'I r e 2(�v,-6 3, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2002 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON,COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT MANAGER: LESLEY NISHJ_H1BA--f�' -- PROJECT TITLE: POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE WORK ORDER NO: 78980 i1 �� U f1''r� tt �� �� -}i s LOCATION: South of NE 2"d Street; East of Monroe Avenue NE r, SITE AREA: 222,844 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 9,909 S i I I MAY 1 0 2002 =� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan eview for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building intended for use as a police evidence vehicle storage buildi g. storyc 4 rg�isRE n ON proposed at one-story in height and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton mamtenan e shops. ;arttwQrk ".�D.,I activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of grading to match existing grades. ________j i A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major. information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histode/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet { �J 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS thilf--- • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS (J2..e-- . I We have review this application ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re ad rtional informafo needed to properly assess this proposal. Ia s� , Signature of irector or Authorized Fteizesentative Date Routing i Rev.10/93 D Tl1hE �,. ................................................................................................ PROJECT NAME: Pau, AJUICt[ . (1rJW ICI Y. 5TZ M r -Hreit,ITV APPLICATION NO: D _c) Z• The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 2• IA uillkiko 2D01L4 5e. Zi35r 1102365%15 MP\P[S miff I °Icis63$ 3 . Kct 'CoiWi l 6m k Ke, Rtytt Ki e on )(Di s� 5tDv FOL fl4 ��� 11o230 rCL 1 V . °1t4 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON APR 3 0 2002 • RECEIVED (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER . • M f Applicant Certification I, I ('i�' Imo{ � -1 , herebycertify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) • " owners and their addresses were obtained from: • D Title Company Records . • • • ing County, Assessors Records' E:.NEVMt°1 i► ., 'Signed (1).6(.)4114a -- Date /4` "` �,�., \ SloeV .9'y2►l0 (Applicant)• % :o�NOTAR1, 7 • NOTARY . PIC ATTESTED. Su aascribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and fogij iSeq.o, Wasl ng • residing at ,,b)t on the: z6 day of:. -" • 19�� ••�; t‘x WAS_`= Signed fulcH ELE NELtin4NW(Notary Public) • • :::::::.::::..:::::::....:.....:.......::::..:..:::.:::.::::::•:::•::::•::::::::•:::::is :::.. .:.:o e.t.jVti,se. of::.:ertton.. .s. . R <I:>: <::::::.:..: .�::•;::•:. :, �.. ........ tlereb..::certif.;::thal::notices:�l':l:tte� ro t ngto€<:€: residl. ::.::.:.:...... `at` `€ aslln erg... �A'1"�E T�><::S�.bscctbed`'antl'swd�n<t��tar�t�i���Ncfa`'< ut�lc>�nar��:fer.tfe..St .e.o�.�t41. .. ..... .............. ...... ...........................................:. ............:... ::.::.: ................::....... listprop.doc MARILYN KAMCHEFF REV 03/00 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 f O •r' 1T'�S� Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Lesley Nieh9dre,Senior Planner,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 88055,by 6:00 PM on ylev 24.2002.If you have ques0ona about NOTICE O F APPLICATION this proposal,or wish to be made a parry of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- thie lxoJecL SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED(DNS-M) CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430.7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE: May 10,2002 .. .._ 1, n as..tuN sleeve LAND USE NUMBER: LUp-024I62,SA-A,ECF • IP II NCSj _.I_II /tit St F f-1pk•9E1 SL l t A ApPUCATION NAME: iOLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE T „ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant U nquesling Environmental(SEPA)and pdminlstraave 91te -_,• C$ __ _r I Plan Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building Intended for use ass potion evidence vehicle 3rd _ storage building.The structure Is proposed at amatory In height and would be located adjacent to the existing i R-8 'i n ' .l 1 City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities are seWnoted at approximately 42,778 cubic yards of f R-10 CS R-1 P) I•1-- pnding o match exbWg grades. PROJECT LOCATION: South of NER'd Street;East of Monroe Avenue NE .��d 3t L- Y11g, l,;,• I I V:r' „ty....- RMH -1, r OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NOI.7•SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):Air the Lead Agency,the City of I •" jet• •% r Renton has determined that eignitbant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore, 1 as permitted under the RCW 43210.110,the Coy of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a t(P) . DNS-M is likelyto be Issued.Comment periods for the project end the proposed DNS-M are integrated Into a single comment period There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- -Ir d ?" 9 • Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14.dey appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. 9 ..._i 4„ r tqq: PERMIT ArPLICATION DATE: April 2002 I •'I �� RMH 5 i �M�...• I III" rice R..1 I NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 10,2002 •• � Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Review i' Other Permits which maybe required: Building Permits,Construction Permits A /.I• '` t ;RMH Requested Studies: I Geotechnical Report,Drainage Study 1 I�—r'S . " „g I Location where application may I:GI:1110►aT be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Werke Division,Development Services Department, 11f. �4y // 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 'a(�. p;.. �4i •> RC(P) ' PUBLIC HEARING: N/A r#i; a.�4; / • CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: _`V �'��_`' Land Us.: The subject site is designated Center Institution(CI)on the aye Comprehensive *�,'��• RC(P) Plan eooge�faetiltY Ls generally caialatent on owith e each of the ese Fend use.The •4j � � • _ Land Use and Light Industrial G/,+ I . .- designations. ///.# 44 •. Environmental Documents that OS•a norm ass in Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A I oueE EVIDEr`IC4`err F5 ``�� NILDIAIG sae 16 23p a R 7/2 Development Regulations Ordinance,PA Zoning Code, Used For Proleet Mitigation: • Workks Standards,Uniform Building Codect will be sbject to the city. e,Unl omr Floe ode and other Puhtie . If you would like to he made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project,complete applicable codes and regulations as appropriate, this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 88055. Proposed Mitigation Measures: File NO./Name:LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF I Pollee Evidence Vehicle Storage 1. The applicant will be required o pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square loot of NAME: new building ores. • 2. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee based one rate of$75.00 per net new ADDRESS: average daily trip associated(et the project 3. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report TELEPHONE NO.: „ submitted with the land use application. NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICEOFAPPUCA7ION . MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION ` STATE OF WASHINGTON F COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I E U Z�/�-� - OC I herein certify that copies of the Y Y P above document were posted by one in �� icuous places on or nearby to described property on )-'�p� . N Signed: /)') a) e� ATTEST:Subscribed and savor before me,a Notary Public,in and for the to of D� Washington residin• tR ,on the /S sir" day of (7i 0--r5 oil0a. MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 / . ' . CO#Y4 . • IRA + t . NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) • DATE: May 10,2002 . LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF •. APPLICATION NAME: POLICE EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan Review for the construction of a 9,909 square foot building Intended for use as a police evidence vehicle • storage building. The structure is proposed at one-story In height and would be located adjacent to the existing City of Renton maintenance shops. Earthwork activities are estimated at approximately 42,776 cubic yards of . grading to match existingr grades. . PROJECT LOCATION: South of NE 2nd Street;East of Monroe Avenue NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of . Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, . as permitted under the RCW 4321 C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 30,2002 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 10,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Review " . Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Study . . 5 . Location where application may ' be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVI W: . • Land Use: The subject site is designated Center Institution(CI)on the City's Comprehensive . Plan Land Use Map and tight Industrial(IL)on the City's Zoning Map. The proposed storage facility Is generally consistent with each of these land use . designations. Environmental Documen that • . . . Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A . . Development Regulations . • Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other • • applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: •. s 1. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of v • new building area) . 2. The applicant will be required to pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. 3. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report • • submitted with the land use application. • NOTICE OF APPLICATION . Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on jiAav 24.2002. If you have questions about . this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager. • Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on • this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 . PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALUNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • .. .._ -1 • • • 13•9T73NP M 1lia • . r, f i I�I-' CS J "" 4th St. n PS r-11Ns• £1 st. —'I 1 +' .1 1 —-�i I - , ' - m idTL �.;.1 • R 81. l • R-10 ....CS R-10CP) -: ! -r-- . x NE End St. R 1b1'- i : , .".f•.... RMH '-..,.._ i r `• ` • It t !"S- Rica t • t(P) �� _ .. , •• -' i- ''.a Et,r. ,'`'i '�" RMH I _ al • , r.RMH • I i I. . Id_ iii no k 1 I / jhst. . . .. • '` 4* RC(P). • . . . VICO�11DE 1 'F5 }" " " wNazo16 TZ3N RSE E V2�dwow Imam a.� ILDIhtti* SI'I 4-364e If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete . this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. • File NoJName: LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF/Police Evidence Vehicle Storage NAME: •`' - ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: • NOTICE OF APPUCATION . I . CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: May 10,2002 To: Tracy Coleman/Community Services • From: Lesley Nishihira/Development Plannin Subject: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage LUA-02-052,SA-A,ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and,therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 4, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions acceptance ....,-..y,........r , ,.,>.:,�:. -'^....-.. ._.,,., nd r" a::."'ii' .,�. y...-. .. - - .vt:. .»::i.ik. _- z:Y_;r A%::i-ti.." .:t,�w:..r,:t§ ..ty..;•::� i-kis<,,.__,;x7,...,x;''-.--;,-, ,.�N, Stc';t•` "mlr,,TM: Y .�`?....:..., - c : .. `."y.x +t ..#.r:�'.+.':? .,,.,g. +t»:,-... 4--gs.�... ...:.>,-m,- :.;.,.�?�:t'.w::,:,lii ......r,. ,, .'� :r. ,te, rp;;C' ."w� ..::V" ii.7.'.:?''"' :^Q.�, .��f#°. :d+., ,L.,v ;}Ytt�."�^.:�: <:?y.�f,.M,re�''Y�t•' .^...'A;x::r .4, „�".. tR .,�«,a � x'i�i.. t..a,. ..`:�,. M�w �-+5' r��T'�,:*�:.`;>�!:^�. .�M;Cw_„'"i'_i.:a, ,i. _; ".''d s.:;s.: , ' _�. :a� ...�:.., :�;: w : :. _.' `�:�.;kC.TY.�O '°Ft '�NTO�I,.,..r., ,�. ._ri., , °�' .-�::,.� a».11,. .rs.. ..�lM' ..+ :0,*.'1.f.a{:: - �^r. €,x, ..si 'e. ..y. ;t` :"`,g ,.�s' `;s«, xxr �.t:, »�.'. :'�«' i.: w.vr,,, :�.+r :'��~-:., .cz. �..�s ��•'�.,:.air<°df5;i�.;a• ;.t_�Y.,*eta..Cs:,,�...�;"��,=e:�r,a1,�"::'�};=•'qK..: S: `�?.� s.���,:.���x- _ ;:i 'x-x�"�`" ,,�y_�,` ..;.:<;:;��.:c.,••�'^;sr�° �� �"� - "�' ` �:;� ...�, �^e -, �'" `::�:"�r v�;.�, ' ;..:ram . �:: ,rx ,,F :El: PxMENT SERVI.CE'S DNfSION�;. ' '':;!�^.g� .'_h e�S..t+^w...��.'.'�y� 4�°.:.r. .y*''&. N )F�.,.,,��D�.<\/r. �'v.. .a r`e�:' .t t,:a a,�-.r.;.` v,7-, z.. T 1"�..'.; `:.:. � ,,,.� L4 A Wes'. 3 A . _':'f,". h" 4;:, ' :s, ,n,�-, `".`P" .'E... .� .a.:&a,-� ;L� :�^.,,�..j.,-. •�vaa,.•. ,�':J..� x.•},t; :.`R''°T;`.' ,y,', �`^•��'.:<;� � �n ,z,«t; 'a•r,xxuC«' :.•; 1,. ;.i~. .w,,. ,r.a�,� To;..pa :>:2<'1s^ ���. '�:.5• d. +„•�''��iil� :V 4r, i.w.r:�::' .i.: ^3 °ski rGe" �r a, 9� 1 .r � '-. .,,Y�ei ..�., � :-dr::w:�''k ::j� "2 i Jv: „a:'. .:5 s.{.:.i4.�`-.,�«iw ,�...,,fa�'a .kr �YK, w r �_�,.'""�u �"�...,;:e� � ,a:<�r .•cyzer�r:.a ,,,�',%�,„? a,•x �xt �:'c - ass. =e^w�a -`=.:tit �__ ...z.•�4.. �. '`»�,�,--� ,,.t'w '? *' •� :°. .a.c.'a''"—. ?•fir'r:. �..�.a ,�" � ",$ '..i� < r;�w�'s�''9��;?v� �� .�,. may,,,.-. ..�:,.-sr `.- �ksL.% .fit "'',�' €,'r- ;•�P�" "•5...;°iq'�,`1`sa> `=;x' ., �;zre 'v ,.,�; �4S .� :a r �•' i}s. a n:-, ii' %,,..ne �`��•e �'3�•.� �.' '.•g�.,. ,.fir.aY. a+aw �,m s,s �v. =.d', i, ?s ,�,.. ,:yig`� %" ..4- .�`&. ��, �. ..F��::��ffi ..M==�..���TER �R^PL.[�AT:ION, ���' � . : ".+ ",' -k.5w:c.t', - �°'4, '"•,.' It - awt.,a,. €.. ,.. Z:i"'�'4,-, > f 'r - .{�,,.kC °:«�''�;s:;:���'"'�'=,'•�..�- ., a'?;'�•s�s��::;.v..�:�:<^..�a.. -. .'�?S'�.....,��..�.; z�»��'_.,-cbp��, '�_4•3.,,�.: .i.�� -.�..�_...<....k:�.:�..:a.....-.,„a� r�� , - '�r �x�.•,�,.a":•.`�,:�.. n :t,.., .O „= ..t x.,rix;,,,,,,;.".�.,4% ;_ i,s.•,t ""ZUi', 'x t v` :; ;i5.-;.i'14;S•:',,,;.• °»s xhq :s .h :; ,;trg .ram':'- .,.f�='lv�. .a. r;"�:=�a..;:�;`�.Sa`:;,,.,'�"a:^5; ':Ham'' „`k' _x�.,v�a�}��M;'•'.,� a£":�•� PROPERTY ) :.. ; .o.. .: �, ''RQJ:E,C 1IN;F� IUTATION ... '� '�?.;: �'�;s• 3 .fre,���: 5." •� j'' r.��€:��5�""_ .�•�.p�'9«` ";-Ma'��� '� ..� w,«•�,�;_�:4�aF..�::..�w.uF:�,x�� :r.,, �,''„+��_<.�,.�.a�x,s:-ti,«.. _.sw `s'. ...rar ::Note:If tt3er simnore;,Ulan'drie le`81.40 er,:ptease att hran;y ' • r•%additiional riotanzed1IVlasterApplication'for:each-owner> ,'ii.:s-'� P4. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: I RL d17)0 Pbu eG-,^v.1/(JW Pr-, VET+-ICI r� NAME: C m�) bS. I?01TD(1 6Tbe1 6 E 'ALI Lt. N PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip Code: ADDRESS: l b 6 5. `( Wild 0 . aF . �5 2 r_e_tr�,,11 0 �r��n�2!.� �1 CITY: ZIP: �1�b55 - LTIL1Lt( 1�042L55 �A L11=4,1 cIlpL �Qt11 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: E n/ Pki Th7 I l2z3?sq1 e7i-4Q/ 425-y So -tea Y, �xt�:;`;.N: :ter�:-��rr;;;�,t . ::,w:.� �,,. ;...�- ;; =�.<r;.�. �-�..�,:. - - _._. $55t�:.. :i4r:-. r,: ,�.' ".. "� ,y`.'.�4il. ,� EXISTING LAND USE S - y.�� LxI�CAt�,,��`�;�'if�o�hei•,�t� an�Fo�n►,��{/er�).�y^ ,w ( ): .,5�<V�„}' ..1T' %`y'+,i7G,;{ :Ca..- Y. A. ',F:� �"L':. �1'".*,'4,f.��:a _, 4:4._... .=A : "•�: w= .;,•S i;_.:` :� - �.A 120To- ►OT Cif'-1 . PI L-E P42. -A. NAME: 6(.G� �S nw f—L PROPOSED LAND USE(S): IZ L Poutc.e Svt OV 4,C&. . VERICl-- a COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: LEI Imo. 1M,6TI-anak/ ADDRESS: DEVCL opA.,,., T ra PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OFR:- ,iNfNG (if applicable): LaI Lit wsn-tuned . CITY: ZIP: Apo 3 U�,�va EXISTING ZONING: • �� I L - I5i12t AZ U C-n-t�T TELEPHONE NUMB• ER cEiv Ei) PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): a b r.v f>!.,�..'4^ art"- v�:°Jti.';r"�,: »,}�>p:":a�:•.k.}::SYe:_`3:w.•�o�::•�;y�'.Y.�,x,Yj",�»`;,:-s�>,'i�`"t.^�'f..«"":.5,;�; � -. Y+ av - .Vr ---- ''' r'''."` =N''''"',Ti,- {P S'�NI.,.,A•te„ ?`:..., SITE AREA (in square feet): l'Z.Z,eS`A .�iron.y>., .:,�;rF,r*,''; �;•a*:�k.>;s s:.=: c'a3.':.:p5; .�R;�;a�:. ^r�i.».'� �'=47.`'.. -::"'•:c:;ti ,,,,.3 NAME: I I�1C� �L SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): . 1 a� COMPANY(if applicable): �,, 1''t . �1N � .-Iz34.1. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY N UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: 1 15 3 /"n�QI ��, / ACRE(if applicable): � I tt (5►U 1 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LliOTS(if applicable): CITY:,. . Q • ZIP: ` I' NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: N I Pt u 226 14- -LoLoa3 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): Lel)LP_XY\LL6,k Li .161 .L.l .LA i k masterap.doc Revised April 2001 r.4-.;'- "m - '.'t'": ,. '�.r;.5• .s;r.<rx..; - :.,;,- :7s..:c r< - ro.„sx eliiiii M, , tw; ' ..-.T.z.'i.� '.� i >.� � t. ,,.: ". tj . -:..G:wia f,r .:4..:;s:."a,.� � ..' ��m..!'r�. ., ,.r roti: _.te+ tY'wiw...'��k ..:::: �'�: ;.:%at \;s nkw...-.�.^_ ,.. a \b a,, k•a.M�_ "k. �..f.-.. . . m1 ._ a..,a Y', ,.»:. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if applicable): N PROJECT VALUE:/� 4470)000IL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): BUILDINGS(if applicable): q ,GQG ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL Er/AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): NA, 1.461,ii� ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. applicable): N/A. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NEW PROJECT(if applicable): NO NDD(T16W L. ❑ WETLANDS _ sq.ft. '• 1LECAL DESCRIPTI®NiOF PR®PERWt ch •. THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY, WASHINGTION, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER;1 THENCE SOUTH 89°01'16"EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,A DISTANCE OF 683.33 FEET,TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 01°04'13"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 363.53 FEET;THENSE SOUTH 89°03'38"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 643 FEET,TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION;THENCE SOUTH 01°00'49"WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE,A DISTANCE OF 363.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;THENCE NORTH 89°01'16"WEST ALONG THE' - SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,A DISTANCE OF 643.36 FEET,TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF. '; „it— ,,,,,i u�,,� C', 4 .'� TYPE O,F APPLIC TIOFJ„ FEELS .; , - t' 4k ,yy,,� .q.:,t�Check II'applicat at apply c eitytstaff wlll d_eterrrmine t• , ; I _ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS _COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ _CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE ✓ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ . :y.00 _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ _VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ ' _REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION —ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) _FINAL PLAT(FP) $ _✓SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ 7000-C7D _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ _SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ _SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ —VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ Postage: $ A O ' _WAIVER(W) $ - TOTAL FEE $ f i 0% 0 OTHER: $ ,q� ijv jf'y y:`k,..Kj:il".:nwn..� ,a.�ws:.;°. .��(i i:Y�" ^:WW.4'• i.w;STs ,,lS--'n n�v .nb• .S-.,"::i:�- i _ >��q'mn• ,iiftti " ' y:�:i�.6,� ..�` max. k+ 5� i; as '..:,c..•.tr..:..rn 7� vY '`�` x iY -y. F~�r�- vk'' ,�W x''� dkT ''�' �«L .;j S. k'• �{`�l:N`.^�" 3,: W'�M ' (� ��pp ,��..��,�, " k''. _ ti.:7M I rot..•:. ':7. ;'ju' ;�«'b".+ ;:4. "e• 'y� � ,fin; .�.d•+; t tY Ti42^tfi:; .ft . =:,t:y^EG, ;) e�.tv. u:i, 4, ,�,�: �� : �:: , ��;':� AFF�I'DA1/:IT�yOF�=O N S¢� �++ a�g �5„„ -�� �',q, �.«�".- :; sue-�: ;' C, R-. 'ik .,,53 ,gP b M -'4 n Y,� I' 11 }'.:";.,ci+.- �, Y_ ...a.ax'i `*.-.,r="F� :.�t;.xrk�'s.�, :'�C..� �;,�a>.�+:i ` a�P.r".. :"4r... ..r''�;';-'....r M`�:�.;.4:�:>�:M.€?:'F�': �?t.9;.:: ;t4��`'; ;�:: li'�.u=-.:^'�:�..�':3��"1",°.:.�:^ i ::'..._ ^'..�ba�ts'�n.:�z�t�"i�.�,%"I�ixV?:;''��. I,(Print Name) • 2-AGY PA • COL Pit AN( ,declare that I am(please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or ✓ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Co,certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -MA L Weey M M. le m a v1 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their f e` Zw bstktor the ses and purposes mentioned in the instrument �,�,.,••• �•Vl�jq�I t �Pc { M M. COIEMAi ! i�l Q__�r G '� :`O�•'sS\ON "f� 1 ( e of Owner/Representative) PI2,1�1 Mi JJ E Notary Public in and for the State of Washington 0 MAR '14 ��': vo f 1,1( / / :U / ��l f f l� /j�- • Notary(Print) l"`t G�� N e 1,�Im c� l� % PUBLIC (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: a`VII-d`a0 511(1''••.9 19 Q�•: masterap.doc Revised April 2001 1�`\\\ W CITY IF RENTON „LL Community Services J e Tanner,Mayor James E.Shepherd,Administrator April 30;2002 Developmental Services Division. City of Renton '1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Site Plan and Environmental Application for Police Evidence Building To.Whom It May Concern: Please accept our application for the Police Evidence Building,proposed for construction near the south end of the City of Renton maintenance shops. Attached you will find the following; 1 Waiver of Submittal Requirements for Land Use Application DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 12 copies of the Land Use Permit Master Application CITY OF RENTON 12 copies of the Environmental Checklist 3 copies of the most current Title Report . . APR 3 0 2002 '2 sets of self-adhesive Mailing Labels 2 copies of the List of Surrounding Property Owners RECEIVED Inner Office Fund Transfer form for Fees 5 copies of the Preapplication Meeting Summary and Comments • 12 copies of the Project Narrative 5 copies of the Construction Mitigation Description ' 12 copies of the Neighborhood Detail Map(s) ,12 copies of the Site Plan. Shows routing for utility trench of electrical only.No other utilities. 12 copies of Architectural Elevations 12 copies of the Drainage Control Plan with Grading Elevations(minimal difference of grades) 4 copies of the Drainage Report . 5 copies of the Geotechnical Report . 1 copy of Plan Reductions . 1 Colored Display of the.Neighborhood Detail Map, Site Plan and Elevations. If you should have any questions or comments,or find an item missing,please contact me ASAP and I will respond to your request. Thank you for taking the time to review this application. - Sincerely, Tracy M.Coleman,Project Manger City of Renton,5th Floor,Ext.6623 Cc: J.A.Bredal,AIA,Pacific Engineering Technologies Denis Culp,Facilities Director,City, of Renton Garry Anderson,Police Chief,City of Renton. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE COThis paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer )EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUbivJITTAL REQUIREMENTS rOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan z1 . ................ .. Elevations,Architectural 3 AND 4 Existing Covenants (Rcorded Copy)4 Eixstiri :Easemier}ts` E2ec�iideci:;Co. ........................................................... ....:........... .......... tlj Flood Plain Map, if applicable4 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 • Grading Plan, Detailed �In :;Goon:>::Assessor::s;:Ma ::fin.icattn ...�..eg.::::::::::::.:::::::::::.::.:.:::..:::::.. ...::.:::::.::.:..:.:.:::.:.... .................................................... ................................... Landscaping Plan, Conceptual 4 DEVELOP :.::::..:�. ................................................................................................................................... ........................... ..................................... ................................................. List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 AP ..:::.:::...::::• : ...:. ::..... .. Map of Existing Site Conditions4 Ytip Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parkin Lot:Cavera a&:.Landsca..0...:i4tiat st.::4.::.....:.::.:::::....::::...:.:..:.:..::::......:..::...:..:..................... .................. .... ....... ...... .... Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 ....... ......... ..............................:............................................................................................. ................................... ....................................................................................... Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 :6fie:W r:s:;A<> :roa>Le Rehabilitation Plan 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section . PROJECT NAME: ge., 7-7 p��-co 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: ,2 - 13 -0 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xis REVISED 5/17/00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC._ WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE A P:: PLDICA:.<::.:;...TIO:>;.>.. NS .- ... LIVE - .MODIFIED..:: :::.::: : .: . ...:::. : : :: ::.;.ANT ::::.::.:: ::::::::.:._::...>. ...: .:... ;< ° t NDU PEMITUS.MI :A:,:.::.. :. ..........:::.: .....:::.: ::.: : :::::::::..:::::::::. : . A: : . �:i7.......•.•.•...........: .Screening Detail 4 < > ::<> : ; » «.;;;:.:;:.;:.;:.;:; :;:.;;.;; : .S ee.PrvfLes > ><: > > .... ; »Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 AJ Traffic Study 2 ....................:....................................:......:....::.:..:.........::: :....:::............. :...... . :.....:: :: :. :...:.....:.:..:.............:. Ai • T.ee.:�ui;>rin I..Ue 6tafton.Cle;�r�n P).an. ...:.:::..:::.:.:::.:::...:::::: : ..: . :.:::: .::.. . t ::::::: :::: :::.:::c .:::..:.::. . . :.. ...;.: Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 UtrtleI la::;y::%:ener:: ::._`rd:' r `: `...... ' %2 `' '::'.' '% ` :: ..:. i es 3larE,Grer. led 2 :.:::. : ::.;:. ..>. Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands> l n 1lV . nd ..PI.anlrn f > : >:<>: :>::>::>:;:::>:>::::>:::, :: :Mi i.i:»:»:<;::::>:<<:«<' : : : < ...::„. <:::> :>:::::::: ><><:>:<: >: »»«::::>::>:::::>::>:;;:::>::»::»:. Wetlands Study 4 .:.:•:..;riVin ory: xlsti.ng S..te .z.,� ,. ..:.............. : :.. :.::;:.;: ....... .....................;:.::;:.:::...::.;:.;:.;:.::.;.;:•..:.......:::::::::.;:.: iip:::...: .::::•„,.:.:.;:..fir;.::. rr...• .:...rift. ... I IVI '. ofi,Ekrtln :::Site. nditlon A. ::: : * .......:.. :......>:>:::>::<:::::>::>:::»:::::_:::.....>:: :::>::»>:<::<.„..:>:::::<:::>::::::::<::< :::>::>::>::::>:: >:::::>::>::::>:: ::<>::»<:>::::>:: ���>:2 tstrriUlat orl Afsib. 2 :::: :. ... ... :i€€€>: f'h asrrnulatios. :;::::::: :::...:............:.>:.:;:..:. ..:...::..:...........:...::................... This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: ?,�Ge. U C-G(/ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: -/-71/, 2/0Z 4. Development Planning Section / h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 Project Narrative Renton Police Evidence Building 9,909 Square Foot Pre-fabricated Building South of 3555 NE 2nd Street,Renton,WA IL-P The proposed project is to construct a one-story building for the police department to store vehicles for evidence on City owned property. The new metal building and other current buildings of the site will cover approximately 18,832 square feet, leading to about 8.5% of the total project site being impervious surface. We propose to place the 9,909 square foot pre-fabricated metal building next to the City of Renton maintenance shops. Grading operations will be limited to leveling a 42,776 square foot area to correspond with surrounding existing grades, by the same time accommodating the building slab, bio-swale and paving. Vegetation removal will be limited to grass and weeds. The bio- swale will be planted with grass. The project area on this parcel in the northern portion adjacent to the City Shops site. Part of the project is presently fenced. It is directly south of the entrance to the Renton City Slops at 3555 NE 2" Street and accessible from the shop entrance. The site is located))in the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. The property and it's adjacent properties is zoned Light Industrial. The City Shops currently use a portion of the site for stockpiling. The site is flat with steep slopes on the perimeter that will be unaffected by the project. The steepest slope is 4.5%vrithin the project area and 30% on the remainder of the project site. The surface of the site is covered with about one foot of brown gravel-sand, which is suspected to be fill material. Underlying the surface fill and extending down about 15 feet is brown, loose to dense, gravel-sand with occasional cobbles. There is no history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. Drainage is good. We propose the placement of a bio-swale infiltration pond on the south side of the building that will act as a catch basin to trap the ° storm water. The bio-swale will filter trapped sediments and impurities from the storm water runoff and remove contaminants before it enters the ground water. There will be no off-site improvements. The total estimated cost is about$470,000. There will be no trees removed for the purpose of this project. It is anticipated the contra6tors shall have one to two mobile job trailers on site. DEvELOPME PANNING CITY OF RENTON APR 3 0 200a RECEIVED 4 Environmental Checklist - r Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility A. BA9KGROUND 1. Namee of proposed project, if applicable: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Renton City Hall Community Services Administration, 5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Attn: Tracy Coleman, Project Manager:425-430-6623 ©EVELop" 4. DatApre checklist l 30,2002 prepared: Cln'OF RiviEENTON 1NG 5. Agency c requesting checklist: APR 3 0 9 Y q 9 002 City of Renton RECElli�® 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): �l Begin Construction: June 2002 End Construction: December 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List iany environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Environmental(SEPA) Review Administrative Site Plan Approval Building Permit • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed project is the construction of a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on a City-owned parcel directly south of the City of Renton Public Works Shops site off NE 2nd Street in Renton. The entire project site is 222,844 SF. The,pre-engineered metal building and surrounding site improvements will occupy approximately 18,832 square feet,or making approximately 8.5% of the project site impervious surface. The 9,909 square foot building will be used to store vehicles that are being held for evidence by the City of Renton Police Department. The Police Department currently leases a facility for this purpose and also stores some vehicles at the Renton Public Works Shops site. Scope of this work will include the construction of the building and paved ingress/egress routes as required to allow tow vehicles access to and through the proposed building. Page 1 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Proposed site is directly south of and accessible from the entrance to the Renton City Shops on 3555 NE 2nd Street, Renton. The project area on this parcel is the northern potion adjacent to the City Shops site. Part of the project area is presently fenced and used as a City Shops stockpile area. This site is in the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16,Township 23 North, Range 5 East. Legal description,site plan,and vicinity map are attached to this Checklist as part of the Environmental Review application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one) - oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Note that there are steep slopes on the perimeter of the site that will be unaffected by this proposal. - b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 4.5%within the project area and approximately 30% on the project site which will be unaffected. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The surface of the site is covered with about one foot of brown gravel-sand;which is suspected to be fill material. Underlying the surface fill and extending down about fifteen feet is brown, loose to dense gravel-sand with occasional cobbles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading operations will be limited to 42,776 square foot area to correspond with surrounding existing grades and to accommodate the building slab. It is anticipated that any fill will be limited to that on site or that imported for base course to be used under structures and pavement. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is not expected to occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Page 2 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Approximately 18,832 square feet or 8.5% of the total parcel will be covered with impervious surface at the completion of the project. Impervious areas include asphalt vehicular routes, pathways to the building entry, and the building slab. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Industry accepted erosion control measures and other construction practices will be used to reduce impacts during construction. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction,dust and emissions from construction equipment are anticipated. After project completion,occasional automobile emissions from authorized vehicles and towing vehicles are anticipated. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. W 'TER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are anticipated. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain. If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Page 3 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes. Storm water will be discharged to ground water. Diversion of site storm water runoff to a bioswale is proposed. The purpose of the bioswale is to trap sediments and filter impurities from storm water runoff to remove contaminants before runoff enters the ground water. Storm water runoff from impervious areas of the site will be discharged to the ground water after completing this filtration process in the bioswale. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. It is not anticipated that waste material from septic tanks or other sources will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of the runoff is expected to be storm water from rainfall. The method of collection is roof drains on the building and controlled grades on the paved areas that will direct the runoff to a bioswale where impurities will be filtered out before being discharged into the ground. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. It is not anticipated that waste material will enter ground water or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water runoff will be directed to a bioswale where impurities may be filtered out before the water enters the ground. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other Note: There are no trees within the project area. The trees checked above are on the steep slope east of the site and on the southern portion of the site. Page 4 • Environmental Checklist • Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility b. What kind and amount of vegetation will-be removed or altered? Vegetation slated for removal will be limited to grass and weeds. Existing trees are NOT affected by this proposal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The bioswale and surrounding areas disturbed during construction will be planted with grass. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other squirrels Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. • 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to complete the project's energy needs. The electricity will be used for ventilation, lighting, power, and the alarm system. No heating system is anticipated in this facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No energy conservation features are planned. The in ground installation of all service cables and conduits are proposed to reduce or control energy impacts. Page 5 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes. Risk of spills from damaged vehicles is possible. It is anticipated that spills would be limited to petroleum products and by-products normally found in automobiles. However, vehicles subject to leaks are normally drained of fuels and other products during evidence-processing before being stored at this facility. Contained hazardous materials that are seized, as evidence, will also be stored in this building. It is expected that these will generally be limited to gas cans, LPG containers, and other materials that are not permitted to be stored at the Police Department's Evidence Room in City Hall. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police personnel trained in special emergency services related to hazardous materials will be permitted to enact procedures to deal with unforeseen environmental health hazards at this facility. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A containment sump in the floor of this building is proposed which will pump contents to a containment drum. This will allow authorized personnel to clean up any spills that may occur. It is anticipated that proper disposal of the contents of the containment drum will be handled by Police personnel on a regular basis. It is proposed that contained hazardous materials seized as evidence will be stored in flammable liquid safety cabinets installed as part of this project. These cabinets will be accessible by authorized Police personnel only and comply with ASHA and NFPA Code 30 specifications. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term construction noise will occur, generally between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm. When the facility is operational,occasional vehicular noise is anticipated. Page 6 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise will be limited to normal construction hours, 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The City of Renton presently uses the proposed project area on the site as a materials stockpile/laydown yard. There is a partially paved and gravel road running through the site that is used by both the City of Renton and King County to access King County Shops area. This route will not be affected by the project. The remainder of the site is vacant land. Adjacent to the site, north, is the City of Renton Public Works Shops facility.To the east is vacant land at the toe of a steep wooded slope and single-family manufactured homes located at the top of the slope. West of the site is the King County Shops area. South of the site is generally vacant wooded land. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a fence around the perimeter of the stockpile/laydown area. No other structures are present. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes,the fence described in 8. c. (Above)will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IL: Industrial-Light(P) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center Institution g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. However,the site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside at the site. Only Renton Police personnel and authorized visitors would work at the site on an as needed basis. j• � Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Page 7 • Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The ridge height of the building roof is proposed to be 22'-6"at elevation 130'. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views to the wooded land to the south of the project area would be obstructed from the Renton City Shops site by the proposed building. Views from the top of the slope to the east will be moderately altered with the addition of this building. However, long range views will not be affected. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare from headlights entering the facility after dusk and light from the building exterior after dusk will be produced by this proposal. It is not anticipated that light and glare would impact adjacent land users. b. Could light or glares from the finished project become a safety hazard or interfere with views? It is not anticipated that light or glare will interfere with views or be a safety hazard. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. Page 8 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • • None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by a principal arterial — NE 4th-Street to a collector — NE 2nd Street. These arterial routes may be accessed from Interstate 405 or NE Sunset Blvd. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest transit stop is on NE 4th Street,over a mile away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Two spaces reserved for authorized personnel are proposed. The project will not eliminate any parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Improvements will be limited to paving the existing access driveway as required to match existing grades. This driveway is gated and used solely by authorized King County and City of Renton personnel. Page 9 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PU LIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other-none. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities are as follows: • Electricity from Puget Sound Energy. • Telephone from US West. It is anticipated that upgrade in electrical service will be made to the adjacent Renton City Shops metal storage buildings and new service for the proposed facility will be drawn from the upgraded panel. General construction activities associated with this work will include trenching, installation of conduit,wiring, and panel. Telecommunications line installation for telephone, alarm system and computer services will be installed from the nearest and most economical source. General construction activities associated with this work will be similar to those associated with the new electrical service. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: • Name Printed: Tracy M. Coleman, Project Manager Date: y o3D-E9-2 Page 10 Environmental Checklist - Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions.on policies, plans and programs. You do'not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Page 11 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. Hovf would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and comIete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: Nae Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 • Page 12 DRAINAGE REPORT RENTON POLICE VEHICLE EVIDENCE FACILITY J RENTON,WASHINGTON DATE: April 24, 2002 .r ^4� 0.11b Cam`., ,0 9** -4A. 4 • !If.' 4 r tiN • 'Y - 21111 4/0 �e�� G�� JCNVAL I • (EXPIRES 23 DEC tc&3• J 4./u-/C)• 1. • • DRAINAGE REPORT SECTION I- PROJECT OVERVIEW RENTION POLICE VEHICLE EVIDENCE FACILITY RENTON, WASHINGTON The project site is located along the east side of the access road extension in Renton, Washington. The site currently is an undeveloped vacant lot in the City of Renton Public Utilities site. The proposed development consists of constructing a one-story building and asphalt driveway. The building will be a pre-fabricated metal building with a footprint area of9,900 square feet and the asphalt driveway will be approximately 8,932 square feet. The main floor level is designated for vehicle evidence storage. Parking is located near the northeast corner of the building. Storm water detention is required by the City of Renton for this project using the King County Surface Water Design Manual. All surface water will be detained on-site and infiltrated so that it will not impact water downstream. The infiltration pond will provide some water quality treatment through the surface soil and vegetation. A filter strip will also be provided as the water quality facility to remove pollutants by filtration through grass blades. The sediment in the runoff will adhere and be trapped by the filter strip vegetation. Roof drains will convey stormwater to the on-site infiltration pond. Footing drains will collect groundwater which will be conveyed to the on-site facility in a separate tight line. The driveway will be sloped to allow sheet flow of the stormwater runoff to the filter strip. The top area of the pond will be approximately 23'x50'. The pond will have an emergency spillway which will convey the 100 year 24 hour design storm event to the natural surface outlet. 2K114 Drainage Rpt.doc 4/24/2002 • Pacific Project No: 714 i l y Date: �2tf/� Sheet: Of: Engineering Technologies Project Name: 1f �,�a 0 •,✓ Po o,, ;. • • • Comp.By: t pP - • Chk.By: 1300 Dexter Avenue North-Suite 100 0 Seattle,Washington 98109 Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281-4611 Contents: [800]621-7300 . I'. j 1 I I i � r � I ! j 1- I ' EJ-.'O I _-L _.U- Nr. -p%A1 /16 - SITU Q I I ! -- I I I 1 i t I i'I. 1 I I 1 1 r� lrI I I ' i 1 i I i I—1 j --[- — I—— .- — ; J--- — j- } -1— i [ ,— I 1 1 1 . 1 1 I �' I I I -- 1 • I !_V E'.t.!-c u A(Z / ram "s ! — F '}93_.ca I �' - -. i 2i,__.f}'c a�s__. 1 . • I I __ia_.�.__ —- — — --— I — — — — �._1 8 — — I , i 1 I i ' I •i I l' I I 1 , 1 1 I ; I -..' _}.-_ .; -�-- 1-- f._ �' 1. C''�_ -}------------ , I � �o,� r �.,. .......... __ - _...__.... l_ • I ; � I I I 1 I -_,_ I i - - I I I ' -- 1 -` '- `.ha"1 -� i i ` I 1-----' i 1 f \I 1 1I. . 1 1 7 i i , i v , I-- 1 r I ' _I 10 ( •I I 1 1 • i [ -r- c I O c.)1 Cl; I I , ' ' � , ' 1 i i f + I h • t 1 1-. I 1 1 i I_ • I 1 i ; { I + ! I 1 • ' : - i__ i 1 1 I 1 i I f. 1 I } l '. , : 1 '__ L_ _ i i I I ;_ j � ( I i � I i i j �.. -_I I . 1 1 ; I 1 i i I i �I I ' I i ; 1 I 1 i 1 , : I i , _.1._ I� i i —I _I I � + I I I i� j � �I 1 1 1 I1I I II 1 1 I 1 1. 1 ' 1 , C i — 1 I 1 I 1 , I I I 1 I I -'_ • i 1 i I I : i I 1 1 ! 1 I I I 1 1 1 ' • I I O4/22/02.03:12:02 PM ..:�.vWl4v,`��� .�4 \ \ �vnxvv,,,vv x,v vv\................... :..\;..::..,:..•::i:i�:•::i�:: 1E1 Eql b' CREATE a new Time Series %''' ;w:`':':s:i <;' ? '.?;;. ` ::''' '"` 3 i:N ry,t ;. ;AMPO 'o�tE0•3. :if ,''V `Sf �u'r##:•• 'mf ;:;wup:r.•.x.;•n..r•vvy,.co•y�wa•4o;•.y;�y::" :r: ::.r,N sr.:::;:•:::•;::::;`sr: Production of Runoff Time Series :;:....::;:;:..........:. :.... :: •;:..:•::•; •> Project Location Sea-Tao '•:;;s.:�:::.::;�::�;:::::::::.':•.:�::::::::;�:::�;;;;::::;::.:�:::;;:::k:i Com P 4 E utin Seri s 2k114d.tsf;:.Regional Q Scale Factor : 1.00 :::::::C•sQ�f!••:t1��i'���lk4ti:�����'�i�:�1Ct�iC�T{:k{BR. .. Data Type Reduced ::::�•::::::.<:.:::::��.::::.::.:::�:.::::::::::::::::::::::::;.�::;:::;::;:.:M s 1Greaten9 Hourly Series erie Fi le ;:::::::?::��#.:•:::ii;;; ;';��� :;'.,�4.�:<;s>isz'!i:::5;;;:<:F•S'2iiC�:.•'::i�}i;i!?.y LoadingTime Series File:C:\KC SWDM\KC DATA\STTP6t:`:<" t:•••a::: A t•.�+ :• ., •••••• •x•_••> <•">: <'::..z• _ _ • �1..Till Pasture 0.42 acres Scalia Yr: B 9 loading Time Seri es File:C:�KC SWDM�KC DATA�STEI6[ `'>''' ':;.':::: {..................................................................:: Imperv ious 0.42 acres Adding Yr: 8 y,��tfj%yx�r�rjuu :55:3i.'::i • Total Area : 0.84 acres ""`''"''``""`' '' Discharge: 0. 49 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Ye ar 8'•:Peak2 gSS E:#'::%i:,?. i .i.i,i 5iif I:Ck :E:E2 i....:i`i :i:'i:i.::::.�,2 Storingiii Time Series File:2k11% ',``.`?,' =='#';?'=>' <'' ;••• •-• Time Series Computed KCRTS Command EEE:E:ii#iE PJftlisEEEEEEfEEiiE::::: :. Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command !!•11. Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:2k114d.tsf . Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:2k114d.tsf ;} Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:2k114d.pks 11 ;:::;+:`.•\:i:::::?::::>::<:�E:>'::;::$:�::;:•:::::•:i:::::::::::::::::5::::;:::;::i:�?�:�::�;:�<;::;::.?:'s#E•�i:i::: :# E:'fi:::'iS:.3E:i:isi.: :: :^:Y:::.:::�::�:::ii:�E::::;::zz:;:`:::i::> °::::i::�5;;;::::.::; :::� :. w.: ,.. . 1 :• •: .. ,�}v.::•;v.v,::•:•::::.:�:::.:...�::w::::.v:•:::::^:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::v::::.:..:::::v:.�:::•.:.,•:::::::::.:::w:•::::::::.�:::::.�:::::::.�:::::::::.:::::::w:.::••:•'• :•}�i. . 4v\ � :�R: v+ •.,-:::.,•:: ::::::iiii:::iiiiii$iijii'iiiii'tiiiiiii::.::j•i:•}:•::•iii:4:•::+.::•i}}};}:.4'•:;:?•i:•;ii;:v;ii:?i:•iiv:•:�:Oii:•:Ji:•iii:?:<•i:4:^:•iii'.:v::v::::::::: , Plow n to ank me of tea k .,,..,.:: ....,%::.......... ;; Flow 12ate an �"ime of e�t - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob....:.......:.. :..::::::..:.:::::.::.:::.,:::.�:.::�::.: . . .^. (CFS) (CFS) Period 0..125 6 2/09/01 2:00 1 100.00 0.990 0.100 8 1i05/02 16:00 0.154 2 25.00 0.960 0.147 3 2%27/03 7:00 ma:a 3 10.00 0.900 • 0.106 7 8%26/04 2:00 0.134 4 5.00 0.000 0.128. 5 10%28/04 16:00 0.128 5 3.00 0.667 n 0.134 - 4 1%18/06 16:00 ro.125( 6 2.00 0.500 2�Ir Peel k 7-log, 0.154 2 10%26/06 0:00 0.106 7 1.30 0.231 '':]:;y •: 0.249 1 1r09/08 6:00 0.100 8 1.10 0.091 n 7 y7 sn nn. .n.gan •• . .... .. :�eYN., .h. .0.fn •• ;�.�4•:, o!:w.�.>� M�:.. ..�...�.. ���... .?¢.{5�p.,.t... #�9�. j:;• '•s5.o- ::�:��i::- ?�::•::::::?7•i:•:�::::}i:.�:••i::•isv:•iY,�v4fiS60POPP%•:4: «L4P0�-0i•�i��•�Iflt:;)00tii:;d4i+«4'...;:f:9PPWtrP?PP}Pf90ti9[ •••.,•••.•::•:•fi••��f�ti::::t ii '.. ' • . I Pacific Project No: 2..101 . Date: L#244/0'2- Sheet: Of: • Engineering Project Name: RE Technologies Comp.By: a DP Chk.By: 1300 Dexter Avenue North—Suite 100 0 Seattle,Washington 98109 Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281-4611 Contents: INF'L I RAT a' PON 0 [800]621-7300 Li ____L -'__ L i - -- •• - 1 . 1 _ SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TEST DATA )4 TEST NUMBER P1 . : :.P2. :; ,. .. . P3 ,-1f AVERAGE � I S II PERCOLATION 6.25 min./inch 1 .48 min./inch 4.65 min./inch i RATE 1 ,� 14-irl'). The average percolation rate of the site soils as determined by these tests is 4.1 .., J minutes per inch. Using a factor of safety of two, an infiltration rate of 8.2 minutes per I inch may be used in design of this detention pond. . 1 I ± 1 1 I j II I- F.l� T�fE ' a j 51QP 1 L50P 1 I . ;R Z1KS� j 11 I I I - . 1• lib j i I I - 1 1— ! .—_ I I 1 I I t-vo- - -- - } - a T } 1_— 4 T Silo 0 466 I r I 1 I 1 I ► I jI ' I ._4_____ 1_ a1 • Mi-! [ i I 1„ i I I I 1 i1-- I • I i � I 1 l- I ■ 1 ± I i 1, i j 1. I I i Ii i ! - • 1 1 04/24/02.09:37:16 AM ' Peak Year 1 changed 'from rank 6 to 5 Peak Year 2 changedlfrom rank B to 7 Peak Year 3 changed from rank 3 to 4 Peak Year 4 changed from rank 7 to B Peak Year 5 changed from rank 5 to 6 Peak Year 6 changed from rank 4 to 2 Peak Year 7 changed from rank 2 to 3 Step:4h (1 of 7) Route to POC; Iterate in Event Window Step:4c (1 of 7) Route All Hydrographs Step:4d (1 of 7) Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.0128 Step:4a (2 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Ranked peaks that halve changed: None• Step:2a Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Initializing rankedlpeaks. Step:2b Route to POC; Iterate in Event Window Step:2c Rdute All Hydrographs Step:3 Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.911 . ! Step:4a (1 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Ranked peaks that have changed: None Step:4b (1 of 7) Route to POC; Iterate in Event Window Step:4c (1 of 7) Route All Hydrographs Step:4d (1 of 7) Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.911 Step:4a (2 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Ranked peaks that have changed: None Type of b'alility: lntiltration Fond Side Slope: 3.UU H:1V Fond bottom Length: 3l.91 tt Fond bottom Width: 3.19 tt Fond bottom Area: 1U'L. sq. tt Top Area at 1 tt. A'b: 15'LU. sq. tt U•U35 acres Ettective Storage Lepth: 3.UU tt Stage U Elevation: 99.UU tt Storage Volume: 1577. cu. tt U.U36 ac—tt Vertical Fermeability: 8.2U ruin/in Permeable Surfaces: Bottom & Sides Riser Head: 3.UU tt Riser 1iia eter: b.UU inches , lop Notch Weir: None .;%, Outtlow Rating Uurve: !lone iw (:lick Right House Button or Fress Any Key to continue ' G 9�tm ':o �:iY�R&u5o�:... ;;CDn;:s':;;:;SS::::�:::::�;::::Si: • r;:•ff:%✓•�aat:::i:: >:�:•: � ::: .%...�,labs........w.Y7i�ro •: .;;. ..::: ,.. . .. ........ r... •�!<,.:•.:•. ......IT.;33....: .......... s.. �Paused:z:i:: � �...::..::..:....... :....... .......I:s• •:• . 9w:1-:::.::.•�%. :..:; �?t3x�Stl:::i: :.�::::.::.:..�.:r�: :�:>���.....::::..::.�h.:�::;.;:::::......�.,,a..:..;..:.;.....»�:.%.:.�:.�:..:.,:.:...:... ...:. �t4 � ...:.::.•:•.ate....... ...�'�.. .r.5�• ::;..............,.. >::--• `t•::::..:....,......:. • a+awc-�wra. •:::::: ::::::::::i::::�::r:::--wt-.,tttacctt�.,,,,w.wu-�.ta.t+. •s .....:.......�ss,,,<wuoat•o-xsa, awoona0000a000eai :•:::. • Pacific Project No: 215iIl-1 ' " Date: 9/2y1O2" Sheet: Of: Engineering Project Name: iNe �i'ol 17ottr..� ' ' Technologies Comp.By: G1' ' • Chk.By'.' 1300 Dexter Avenue North-Suite 100 0 Seattle,Washington 96109 Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281-4611 Contents: Pi Li'E g skit‘p [BOO]621-7300 �_ II 1 FIGURE 6.3.4.A FILTER STRIP TERMINOLOGY 1 ; -- I I i ; i .direction. - °' I Contributing_�": o . --- of:flow �� g drainae area:. ' w :: • __J_ m '' :,5 �� _ lateral slope v r { ( filter strip length"L" vf' vL I I i J `J, n 44 w, J .v, w, J 'J, J 4, { . 4' vi' v(, `J, 4' 4 vi' -1 ; I I + i strip width"W" I I "-_._ . --r i I , l I �� T r 1___- { I i l 1 ! I _ • 1 1 1 �. { I l , { = - 2k114 Renton Police Evidence Facility I { { -- -� use- "-l/-ekL«?_. psi" - Filter Strip Requirements . "i IFF'( ..,24!__ZA.c4.6--s ' -! i_— Q2yr= 0.052 (KCRTS) i Qwq= 0.0312 • , { nwq= 0.35 I ' W= 105 ' s= 0.1 1 I 1 df= 0.006 I 1 Vwq= 0.046 1 i _ - , r-- 1 —j _11 L= 25.064 1 1 rI. ----- :IL ; i 1 ! I i ( 1 i { --J___I i 1 1 + I ! 1 { i I --a-- • ! I j Pacific . • Project No: 2 hi IN � Date: 11'21-1/02 Sheet: Of: Engineering Technologies Project Name: r<ENTO", ?Old a:' g... Comp,By: EPI Chk.By: =. , . • 1300 Dexter Avenue North—Suite 100'0 Seattle,Washington 98109, " Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281.4611 _. Contents:.::: I L"S�gft [800]621'7300 ,.. .• .,.• . : : 1 I � FIGURE 6.3.4.A FILTER STRIP TERMINOLOGY 1 - i 1 I i _ direction. ' contributing_J" o of:flow. — I , �-drainage area.. � � :: r I lateral slope - ����o�o� !r; ,o�oa �o�aU �o�a� �w�oua� vf, 4, vf, vf, \J, of vl' of �'; _ vf, vf, .d. ..r- J. , filter strip length L" - — — `- I 1 strip width "W" I I • �-1 • -- -- - 1- . 2k114 Renton Police Evidence Facility • ' usF. -v-ett% � — Filter Strip Requirements I—. I I Q2yr= 0..052 (KCRTS) ! ;�___ Qwq= 0.0312 nwq= 0.35 W= 105 ; [ s= 0.1 -I df= 0.006 1 I Vwq= 0.046 j 1 i f L= 25.064 I i , i , r r- - Ii I i !i ! ] 1 i i ' ' i ' - I — 04/24/02 01:36:43 PM • - .6Tki :iir6:5ii :i::i::>:i:i:S;ii::; :i:; ;::; :i:::::i:::i:::::i::i:s::'•:;:i;ii:i;;:;»:r;<;:sr::: ff • • KCRTS Command '" • CREATE a new Time Series • Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series : 2k114drv.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 ii Data Type : Reduced iiCreating Hourly Time Series File !Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SaDM\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8 ;:Impervious 0.21 acres Scaling Yr: 8 in Total Area : 0.21 acres — fr1 P&f t),OOS :::Peak Discharge: 0.D99 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 .:......,•:.....,...ji.i,'',.::.....:'...::'.,:.',:....'s.,:.:: Storing Time Series File:2k114drv.tsf 8 T. Time Series Computed ii KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies .1! • Loading Stage/Discharge curve:2k114drv.tsf . Flow Frequency Analysis • Time Series File:2k114drv.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac f;;_5 Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:2k114drv.pks wy oow . 3, .\ •+k \ +:••\k;a,:•r:•rrr,r,:r:,,,,•.r+:,:•r:•:;•r:<.r:nr••r••r:•r:�:•r:•r:,+. Jrrr:•r4:•:J:;;::':+' •:\:•r:?;:;•:;r'^r:^::: ::::^:4rr:^:;{n:•irrvr:4r:rr;::• \+ \ .:,,,.,,n, •::\wnw:r::••»;•,,:•H:rJi:•isL•r:3::h:;>.•r:;•:tr'4:v:•r:•i%:::::::.,•: .\\:4:4•r':•rri:;•r+;J:::xr:;P:^rr:;•r'^:•r:O;t{;i> �\\ \\\ \`���\ \. ...... .w:•+r::••..........:.,Jtir:•rr\•4::::::rr:::::::• :r::::::::::::r:.�:::�::i�.'J:i�:ii>�iiii',...11� � ... ....h v;_rr. Return :..::: .....................+......................................................n...........................$ �� F ow 'ate an ime o 'ea - - Peaks Ran1t+••�Returri' Prob 'rrr'r `+"�' ..•.J (CFS) (CFS) Period ` " ii 0..051 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.099 1 100.00 0.990 0.045 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.076 2 25.00 0.960 0.062 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.062 3 10.00 0.900 ii 0.052 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.062 4 .5.00 0.800 0.062. 4 10%28/04 16:00 0.054 ' 5 3.00 0.667 0.054 - ' S 1%18/06 16:00 11.0.521 2.00 0.500 ZY/'• PERK 0.076 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.051 7 1.30 0.231 ii 0.099 1 1i09/00 6:00 0.045 8 1.10 0.091 ...... ...PA..La... .._._--. ..l,1199 .... ......... ..Sll..11fl_ .., ...QAII. . arC�:>::;K '.;., :: �I B'• kN {l:2 .tt:fi;:;:;` :fib. ✓>: : : ii '�.:........ . ..�i••• ' i '::.::..,: � � •i<i.::�'#:.G.9.:f��'i�•i:•;:#: ',i� �iit'r'sEz�'.lCrR75!•::�s:;::�i's•%.....:�;� ''.#::••. ..� MAiftig • • SCHEDULE A COMMITMENT NO. EFFECTIVE DATE OF COMMITMENT: A-284124 U-13 NOVEMBER 3, 1981 AT 8:00 A.M. YOUR NO.: KING COUNTY PREPARED FOR: CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH l-) V RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 CI,10Aii ATTN: DON MONAGHAN O�RFN O imNG INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: APR3814P PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ECOIVED 719 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ATTN: JON M CROSS DIRECT DIALING ( 2061 223-7906 1. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNERS/PURCHASERS POLICY - FORM B - 1970 COVERAGE: STANDARD AMOUNT : $450,000.00 PREMIUM : $1,084.00 TAX j : S58.54 PROPOSED INSURED: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST IN SAID LAND IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: KING COUNTY A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON A-284124 PAGE 1 C • 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG THE EAST—WEST CENTER OF SECTION LINE SOUTH 89' O1' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 683.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1' 04' 13" EAST 363.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1' 04'13" EAST A DISTANCE 960 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 89' 03' 38" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 642.05 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCOOUTH 1' 00'49" WEST ALONG EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE 960 •FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 03'38" WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 643 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A 60 FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: THE EAST 60 FEET OF THE WEST 713.33 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE EAST 373.33 FEET OF THE WEST 653.33 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST . QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ALSO TOGETHER WITH A 60 FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE WEST 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. par:G 7 SCHEDULE B 1. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: A. INSTRUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREATE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE PROPERLY EXECUTED, DELIVERED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD. 11 SCHEDULE B OF THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES FOR VALUE OF RECORD THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 2. LIEN OF REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. 3. GENERAL TAXES ARE SHOWN AS EXEMPT ON THE GENERAL TAX ROLLS FOR THE YEAR 1981 BEING COUNTY TREASURER'S PARCEL NO. 162305-9123-03 4. CONTRACT OF SALE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS, AND THE EFFECT OF ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY THEREWITH: SELLER : KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NORTHWEST PURCHASER : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DATED : AUGUST 18, 1981 RECORDED : SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 AUDITOR' S FILE NO.: 8109020591 5. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. FOR : PIPE LINE IN FAVOR OF : JAMES TACHELL RECORDED : SEPTEMBER 4, 1928 AUDITOR'S NO.: 2486007 AFFECTS : THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, INCLUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH A-7P1176 PAr_F A HAVINGS FIVE FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, WHICH IS SOUTH 88' 48°45" WEST 249.5 FEET DISTANT FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 6' 01' EAST 1983.8 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER WHICH IS NORTH 36' 22' 30" WEST 2430.8 FEET DISTANCT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 5' 50' WEST 200 FEET TO THE TERMINAL POINT OF THIS DESCRIPTION. 6. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHEREBY SAID GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OILS, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING MINES, ETC., PROVIDED THAT NO RIGHTS SHALL BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY. AUDITOR' S NO.: 4189945 7. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. FOR : SANITARY SEWER LINE IN FAVOR OF : CITY OF RENTON RECORDED : JANUARY 22, 1979 AUDITOR'S NO. : 7901220622 AFFECTS : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, N.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, CONTAINED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, THE THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER 81 FEET, THENCE NORTH . 89' 03'38" WEST 35 FEET TO A SEWER MANHOLE APPURTENANT TO A 12 INCH SEWER PIPELINE, DESIGNATED AS MH NO. 14 WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 89' 03'38" EAST 1146 FEET TO MH NO. 10. THENCE NORTH 81' 20'00" EAST 268 FEET TO MH NO. 9, THENCE NORTH 62' 20'00" EAST 76 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE END OF THIS DESCRIPTION. TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH EXTENDING 15 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ABOVE DESCIRBED CENTERLINE. SAID MATTER MAY BE MERGED WITH THE RECORD TITLE. 8. AN EAS MENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. r_. A_7514174 cer_F 4 FOR : SANITARY SEWER LINE IN FAVUR OF : CITY OF RENTON RECORDED : JANUARY 1, 1979 AUDITOR'S NO. : 7902010676 AFFECTS : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, CONTAINED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH AND 5 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 1361 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A 12 INCH SEWER PIPELINE. SAID MATTER MAY BE MERGED WITH THE RECORD TITLE. 9. WE NOTE A RECORD OF SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WE HAVE MADE NO DETERMINATION AS TO ITS EFFECT ON THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY AND NO INSURANCE IS GIVEN ON THE BASIS OF THE LINES OF PROPERTY AS SHOWN THEREBY, BUT NOTHING APPEARS OF RECORD BY WHICH COULD BE CONSIDERED AN ALTERATION OF THE EXISTING RECORD DESCRIPTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED HEREIN. RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1981 BOOK 26 PAGE 261 AUDITO S NO. : 8102269001 10. IN ADD TION TO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SHOWN ABOVE, THE OWNER' S POLICY APPLIED FOR WILL CONTAIN AS EXCEPTIONS IN SCHEDULE B THEREOF, THOSE PARTICULAR STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WHICH ARE PRINTED ON THE INSIDE BACK COVER HEREOF AND DESIGNATED PARAGRAPH( S) : A THRU J NOTE: THE OWNERS POLICY TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN ENDORSEMENT( S) : WA: 10 NOTE: INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. E. NOTE: A CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ALL CHARGES AND ADVANCES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE PROVIDED AT CLOSING. A_711l.1 7L oAr_F 5 NOTE: IN EVENT THE TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE AND THIS COMMITMENT IS CANCELLED, A FEE WILL BE CHARGED TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE INSURANCE CODE AND THE FILED SCHEDULE OF THIS COMPANY. RW/DW 235 The Company has not surveyed the premises described in A Gv4/Z4 The sketch below is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company-assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show all highways, roads and easements adjoining or affecting said premises. w • a R � 30 1 P S.E. /3ZA/4 S-r. TGW ESMX T G (cC • 0 • 0 • 6/3• • • • N • M , 71 7:71 t,17''''F77 :! 77-3 Bet ist En ,rb Engineering Services Ja J � 32240 8th Avenue SW PO. Box 25804 Federal Way, Washington 98023 Federal Way, Washington 98093 Phone: 253.661 .7658, Fax: 253.661 .1399, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com August 22, 2000 Lesley Wliscomb Community Services City of Renton op Renton City Hall - 5'' Floor ciryoFN.rp 1055 S9uth Grady Way RFM'oNNiNe Renton, Washington 98055 4PR 3 �E u2 Re: Percolation Testing of Near Surface Soils iliED Proposed Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 8555 NE 2"d Street • Renton, Washington BES Project Number: 20031, Report 1 Dear Lesley: As requested, Bergquist Engineering Services provided geotechnical engineering services related to design of the proposed detention pond for the referenced project. Based on information provided by Erika Pfeiffer of Pacific Engineering Technologies Inc., we understand that the proposed stormwater detention pond will be constructed west of the southwest corner of the planned Police Vehicle Storage Building as shown on the attached Site Plan for Percolation Tests. The detention pond will be about 50 feet long by 27 feet wide and about four feet deep. On August 16, 2000, Bergquist Engineering Services, with assistance from City of Renton personnel and equipment, performed three percolation tests in the vicinity of the proposed detention pond as shown on the attached Site Plan for Percolation Tests. Three, four-foot-deep test pits were excavated with a backhoe and the percolation tests were performed in the bottom of each of the test pits. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION : Percolation Testing of Nec __.tirface Soils City of Renton Proposed Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility BES Project Number: 20031 , Report 1 The materials excavated from each test pit were visually classified to determine the subsurface soil conditions. One sieve analysis was performed in the laboratory on a representative sample of the native soils. The results of the test pits and laboratory testing are presented on the attached Test Pit Logs and Grain Size Distribution report. In general, the surface of the site is covered with two to three feet of GRAVEL-SAND- SILT with occasional cobbles and debris consisting of wood, metal, and plastic. This layer is interpreted as fill. Underlying the fill, native soils were encountered. The native soils, according to the Unified Soil Classification System, classify as brown, medium dense, GRAVEL-SAND to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT (GW-GM) with cobbles some boulders. According to the U.S.D.A Textural Classification System, these soils classify as brown sand. Three percolation tests were performed at a depth of about six inches below the bottom of the test pits. Falling head percolation tests were performed using six-inch diameter PVC pipe set into the hole. The pipe was carefully filled at least twice with water to soak the soils. Two to three tests per location were performed to determine the repeatable percolation rate. The results of these percolation tests are summarized in the following table. The three test pits were backfilled with the excavated soil upon completion of the tests. SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TEST DATA TEST NUMBER,::., P1 P2 P3•:;:`- PAVERAGE ERCOLATION 6.25 min./inch 1 .48 min./inch 4.65 min./inch RATE The average percolation rate of the site soils as determined by these tests is 4.1 minutes per inch. Using a factor of safety of two, an infiltration rate of 8.2 minutes per inch may be used in design of this detention pond. Detention ponds require periodic maintenance to retain the shape, volume, and infiltration characteristics used in design. Therefore, a maintenance program should be developed and followed. The program should include annual inspection of the floor and slopes by a representative of the owner to determine whether the floor is becoming Page 2 of 3 • Percolation Testing of Ner„_:Jrface Soils City of Renton Proposed Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility BES Project Number: 20031, Report 1 clogged with silt or clay sediments or vegetation and to determine whether the slopes are retaining their shape. The owner must realize that, periodically sediments and vegetation will need to be removed from the floor of the detention pond. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please contact me. Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering Services .40 OlikA` . � . vco ' . Richard A. Bergquist, PE 443 Principal Attachments: Al Site Plan A2 Log of Test Pits A4 Unified Soil Classification System A5 Grain Size Distribution Report Distribution Addressee (5) Page 3 of 3 Existing Chainlink Fence ems' u u c 1 -':;.:,:PROP05ED ; :' r ii _ jaI'Vy` ;5,�, ieik:. y�.g� �/EH r ..4T& [ Proposed Driveway L. 7x sf„ P3ED Proposed Driveway • Al.'s- Approximate Scale:1"=60' • ED Percolation Test Number &Approximate Location SITE ELAN FOR PERCOLATION TESTS Project Name: Detention Pond for Proposed I chicle Evidence Storage Bergquist Engineering For: City of Renton Facility Services Location: Renton,WA 13E5 Project Number:20031-1 Pate: August,2000 Al Log of Test Mt Fl Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Renton,WA Excavated By: City of Renton BE5 Project No.: 20031-1 Logged By: R. A. Bergcluist, P.E. Date Excavated: August 16,2000 .�.'.rti�w{2�,,i�,u+' :3. ward'',' 'ti. 'Y' 'a-.'NY;,'('tt'A{, :S\"✓,i ;);"i ll::, Y3 i w«, :.•::' .YTS'4�1'� q '�rV! - y 1. 1Ykt,i�f..,�:'�.! {o t '�i.!'. }r v':.'4��;v :,i r ,C :� .��.., - fib: 2:S �'•{ .L ,3 ;V.i .1. �... c1.�:' 41d'lY '�� l�t .��";�c'q'�c j�. ?�... y� .r1v�p-,Y'.:-.•,:1...,.,. M':' C:'�.s�,.. , �� �"; .L,+.�iil ,�'..�. rCti•'.�.�y.•�?+'}, '!;}? trt:i Y,s. .tea 5^' a. Gti q°S d•4-( �, :' ,:.,._., - ..::,:,:...:,:..... ..,,,..,.. -�n ':�. es_� . o 'nd;Classification J. ,t. ram:,:v:...:^:'.�..,..:: -e¢3.n •rt! Q �t h .Y.. , i !� 1P �4 5 `4 3 �� _ y •�a J• .:i�Yr�.:�VI...a 4'l j' 7. ,N Y u=: �S. ..tte ..t`vs .1�..•w .rip rat 'VOWS, ,Z 4; ••\ r, eo"< '9`.,';,;:.•, .,> u;4= YyYr ,rv;•?..,,••Yr:u. fir. w,4ira:}.+rdtr..,::L✓;i°`,...'t�: _1_ —1— Brown, GRAVEL-SAND, occasional cobble, and debris 2 (FILL) _2_ 3 _ _3_ 551 GW-GM Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND 4 I to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble 4_ End of Test Fit. Dry at Completion. 5 —5— Log of Test Pit f 2 Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Renton,WA Excavated By.City of Renton DES Project No.: 20031-1 Logged By. R.A. Bergouist,P.E. Date Excavated:August 16,2000 S"• "ia 9 ? v fv. b 3V t .i'*a t 4 ti , :4€ 4 r x.xV -y> '':`'Cl ,'.)—f'C"'' ::,;;" 5':9a° +se'+r 'yz ': Jt •v a K rx-It .1 ',,,� Ir ;Al t £ *"� ' .'I'v s,'� .i,: 4, + '<.: �' 1� � {t. r 1 ! r' t >,y. F .ar���E >l-+"� �� ''�Z F Y �6r � �^��.. fie:' ,�?iM1,^: G r. 1 v,• ' f .�;y r,-'rt t Y AVY1` sr`lEl t ,x�rgyg,,ji y'�w ;,� ff�?-1.3, i' . ,e, , g•.^1 ,. b S—•fg F =e,N S r{4/'1.�,AY �o t ; 7P`4t,tili: `;v'�',. r r rr f ,r+.'nna , '5 t C 1 I 'G„ z'F rY *... 4> :s\ ,iay. f ;,4 s r n Glary cation: .y iW a�. x r 0 rs- ��x �;x 1 �i �kYcayc�'• ar fi o l'• ma's ,'. +{ Y�IS... y � `m ,, -42k 96 x t+-, '*:*p,"�,. 1r y/ *i 1r Iv: .,>`k' �� ''- ,1,. '• + '•+ :4„?.�''Y3 - '.C+ co Y . l ,:r "S .ti t fY, d :,, .. �r a,� ,, ...5'.::,4, .u-,>,,?'0,t;�_ ti't'cr Pik`. b" ..z. 'a: yr.)"14 t�•�s- r �'. ';'\1' t 'a '"f;,a,. k�...,i ;: ,.;:t..$ ::,:-.0, M1 , ue+ v.P';75 Y :7.7 Mt ••t$ ',1 t )1Ft• + ,1-- J.P'. ;frv...,4 �...a \ S?. ,t.t..'i.^',Y.rs.1k. :.'. •i"Yid.',,.' M t _1_ • Brown, GRAVEL-SAND 1— 2 occasional cobble,trace debris (FILL) 2 Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND GW-GM to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble 4 4— End of Test Fit. Dry at Completion. 5 —5- 6 _6_ A2 • Log of Test Mt 173 Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Kenton,WA Excavated By: City of Renton DES Project No.: 20031-1 Logged By: R. A. Dergcluist, P.E. Date Excavated: August 16,2000 ktgE + . o Dcscri' "on and`ClaaatPcation ' ' ; : Z 1 Brown, GRAVEL-SAND, occasional cobble,trace _1_ debris (FILL) 2 2_ Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND GW-GM to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble _4_ _4_ End of Test fit. Dry at Completion. 5 5 A3 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the#200 sieve.) GROUP S';YMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GUI Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SANE)mixtures, GP less than 5%fines. GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger GM Silty GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures,more than No.4 sieve. than 12%fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures, more than 12%fines. 5W Well-graded 5AND5 or Gravelly 5AND5 mixtures, less than 5%fines. SIP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. SANDS SM Silty SANDS, SAND-SILT mixtures,more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller fines. than No.4 sieve. C Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures,more than 12% fines • Note:Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS • (More than 50%fines. Fines are materials passing the#200 sieve) GROUP ;SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS,very fine SANDS,ROCK FLOUR,Silty or Clayey SANDS CL Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity,Gravelly SILTS and CLAYS CLAYS,Sandy CLAYS,Silty CLAYS,Lean CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 OL Organic SILTS,or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity • Inorganic SILTS,Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine MH SANDS or SILTS,Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity,fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH - Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity r I PEAT,MUCK,and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note:Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the"A"Line and have a plasticity index(PI)of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services A4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION • SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S.STANDARD I GRAIN SIZE IN MM ?. O co v co cv et r= •-• A S V. S :lit ..s. 0 ti:2 8 8 8 8 8 8 i 4 4 4 . . c: . q . 1 00 4 ,- ? 4 s §__ 0 - - ............... ,..• .. ......... ---..._ ., .. .. -"- • .--••• - ... . .. ... ..... .... 90 , . - 10 .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. ... •-• ............ ....................... ... • •-•-•-••••• . - ... . . .. . . .... . . ... ..... . .... •-••--•••• •••• • .... ' . . .... ... .. .. . . • •• • • •• • • ••• •• •• - • •• ••• • . . 80 - . 20 .. ........ ' • •-- - -0• • • • -• • - •• - .._ . .. - ... ' '""-"" m -o . . ._............ . MI m • ' •• ••• -• - - • - - ..... L 33 ... -- .._.... .. ... ._............ M.... .. ...... - ••• •-•----•-•• Z M ... .. ... .... ... ... .... .. - •-• • --- ' ._............ --I Z .... ••••• - --- .., ••• ...-•.----- / -ri .... . • .. ...._ ..... .. ... .......... .............. so .... .. > z - ----- • •••--•••--- ii • ' • • •------ cn 33 50 • . , , . 50 co r .... ........ ......... .. ... .._. •••••.....- . M -< --• - ••• - •••••••• :„......._......... •-•---•-• co • .............. -< ,>. m ... ........ .... ... ... .......... ••• —.-- ' •"—-•"-" m i - • •-•—••••••• 0 d -I 30 , •"""-"" 70 • - - • ... ..... ......... .. .... ... .. ........ ..... .. - •---•••••• ..... • • .......... . • •---•••• .. ... ... . .. ... . .. .... .. ... .... •-•--•••--- -- • ' " " - ...... -- .._..... .. ._............ •••• • -- -••• .. ... .. ........ ... ....... ....... - ' _ • . ._............ • 10 . 90 .... -•••-- " •••-• --......- • ._............ ...... .._......... ... ...... •••......- .......... -.'... •-•••••---- T a"'r• i- 1.• 1 , 1 TI T in r••••1" -rci r-1...I. T Tri_1** 0 .... 100 , 1 § § I E E _ § g. 8 8' 8 4 8 8 c:,co co .4 co CNi v— "'CC! Wi ": cl 4 4 4 q . GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS - . COARSE 1 FINE COARSE L MEDIUM I ' FINE_ FINES COBBLES GRAVEL SAND . • ' . ' Moisture KEY Test Pit Boring No.or DEPTH USCS • DESCRIPTION • LL PI Content(%) • a o P1 4' GW- Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND GM to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED VEHICLE EVIDENCE , STORAGE FACILITY iJ 3555 NE 2ND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON PREPARED FOR CITY OF RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON r i± BY BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 20028 REPORT NUMBER: 1 I i J 136.1/ zop._ C17)/OfrIft7-PLA 3 "&trrolAVIN/A/G _i APR a a i :1 ft° 1111110, 10 PROINIPPION 100110 Bergq ,,, it Engineering ,,, '.6rVide der - ib Engineering ineering services g� g 32249 8th Avenue SW ` PO. Box 25804 Federal Way, Washington 98023 Federal Way,Washington 98093 Phone: 253.661 .7658, Fax: 253.661 .1399, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com July 28, 2000 Lesley Wiscomb Community Services City of Renton Renton City Hall - 5' Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Subsurface Exploration • Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility 3565 NE 2' Street 0 Renton,Washington BE Project Number: 20028, Report 1 Dear Lesle : • This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed flood control wiell to be constructed at City of Renton properly at 3555 NE 2nd Street in Renton, Washington. The geotechnical exploration was performed to provide subsurface information and geotechnical engineering recommendations in accordance with BES Proposal Number 13000 dated July 11, 2000. The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, and presents our recommendations regarding foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. The appendix of the report presents site maps, boring logs, and explanatory aids Based on our exploration and engineering analysis, the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility may be supported on conventional spread-footings using an allowable GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility BLS Project Number: 2UU28 Renton, Washington July 28, 2000 bearing capacity of up to 3,500 psf for design of the footings. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below finished grade in native, undisturbed, medium dense to dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) soils. Specific recommendations relative to design and construction of this project are presented in the attached report. The subsurface conditions and recommendations presented should be verified during construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Renton. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. .�., Sincerely, A� gp,, Bergquist Engineering Services ♦c waste -7 .,* v L m ,5 fir/ ✓ I` ,.5 51.. I WIREs 4/OZ.. I Richard A. Bergquist, PE Principal Copies to: Lesley Wiscomb (5) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION 3 4.1 Surface 3 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater 3 5. DISCUSSION 4 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 4 6.1 Seismic Considerations 4 6.2 Foundations 6.3 Slabs-on-Grade 6 6.4 Earthwork 6 6.4.1 Site Clearing 6 6.4.2 Excavation 6 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation 7 6.4.4 Slab-on Grade Preparation 7 6.4.5 Drainage 7 6.4.6 Materials. 7 6.4.7 Placement and Compaction 8 6.5 Surface Drainage 9 6.6 Groundwater 9 6.7 (Construction Observation and Testing 10 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS 10 APPENDIX Vicinity Map Al Site Plan A2 Boring Log A3 Boring Log Notes A6 Unified Soil Classification System A8 Schematic of Footing Drain A9 Notes Al • GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED VEHICLE EVIDENCE STORAGE FACILITY 3555 NE 2ND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON prepared for CITY OF RENTON by BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 20028 JULY 28, 2000 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility to be constructed on City of Renton property located at 3555 NE 2"d Street in Renton, Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map on page Al in the Appendix of this report. The geotechnical exploration was performed by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) to provide information or recommendations regarding: • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, • allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with 1 estimated settlements, • lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, • influence of groundwater on the development, • site preparation, and • excavation slope considerations. Ms. Lesley Wiscomb authorized our work by signing and returning a copy of BES's Proposal Number 13000, dated July 11, 2000. 1' 28,2000 Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage _ . ility July Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Based on information provided by Lesley Wiscomb, we understand that the proposed development will involve construction of a high-bay, single-story, slab-on-grade, pre- engineered metal building that will be about 110 feet long by about 95 feet wide. The ground surface around the east, south and west sides of the proposed building will be used as driveways and parking. The building will be constructed on a site that is currently used as a material storage yard by the City of Renton. The finished floor elevation of the proposed building will be at or near the current ground surface elevation of the site. Actual live and dead loads that will be transmitted to the foundation were not available when this report was prepared, tierefore, to evaluate alternative foundation systems and estimate settlements, we have assumed maximum column loads of 75 kips and maximum continuous wall loads of 3 kips per lineal foot. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a review of Geologic literature, and drilling and sampling three borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan on page A2 in the Appendix of this report. Samples were taken at the intervals noted on the individual boring logs, which are presented in the Appendix on pages A3 through A5. The geotechnical engineer logged the borings and obtained bulk and standard split-spoon samples for analysis in the laboratory. Upon. .. } completion, the borings were plugged with bentonite chips and backfilled with site-soils. Laboratory analysis included visual classification of the soils sampled. The field and laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical-engineering practices in the area. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence age Facility July 28, 2000 . Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. 4.1 Surface At the time of this exploration, the surface of the site sloped from a high elevation of about 109 feet above mean sea level in the northeast corner of the site to a low elevation of about 105 feet above mean sea level in the southwest corner of the proposed building site. Surface drainage appears to be in the form of sheet-flow towards the southwest. The ground surface to the north of the proposed site is paved with asphaltic concrete and used for storage of electrical traffic-control equipment. An asphalt concrete paved road runs along the east side of the site and generally follows the grade of the proposed site. A gravel road runs on a slight skew towards the west south west near the south edge of the proposed site. This road grades down towards the south-west so that it is two to three feet below the proposed site. The ground surface along the west side of the proposed site is covered with weeds and nearly follows the grade of the proposed site. 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the boring logs in the Appendix of this report. The stratification lines indicated on the boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. The surface of the site is covered with about one-foot of brown GRAVEL-SAND (GP), which may be fill. Underlying the surface fill, and extending the full depth of the exploration, brown, loose'to dense, GRAVEL-SAND (GP) with occasional cobbles was encountered. In general, these soils exhibited "N-values" ranging from 13 to 36 blows per foot except for a two-foot- Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage- ;ility July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 thick layer crif brown, loose GRAVEL-SAND (GP) that was encountered from a depth of four and one-ha f feet to six and one half feet (41/2'to 61/2') in Borings 1 and 2. Based on visual classification and estimated grain-size distribution it is estimated that the site soils are hi hly permeable and minimally erodible. • Groundwat r was not encountered in any of the borings at completion. Groundwater readings in granular soils, such as those encountered at this site, are generally accurate even after short periods of observation. Whereas, the groundwater level in fine-grained (silt and clay) soils, may require several days of observation before it becomes stable and accurate. 5. DISCUSSION • The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratory borings. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those enc Iuntered in the borings, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present recommendations regarding seismic considerations, foundations, lateral earth pressures, and for earthwork, excavations, drainage, and groundwater. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the project site is in Seismic Zone 3. According to Table 16-J of the UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by a Soil Profile Type Sc. The soils at this site are not susceptible to liquefactioln. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence: .ige Facility July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 6.2 Foundations If the earthwork recommendations presented later in this report are followed, the proposed Vehicle Storage Facility may be founded in the native, undisturbed, brown, loose to medium dense or dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) soils encountered at a depth of about two (2) feet below the existing ground surface. If the foundations are placed in these undisturbed native soils a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 3,500 psf may be used to dimension individual column and continuous wall footings. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by one-third for short-term loads caused by seismic events and wind. Lightly loaded, interior partition walls may be supported on thickened floor slab sections provided that: (1) loads do not exceed 750 pounds per lineal foot, (2) thickened sections are at least 12 inches wide, and (3) section thickness and reinforcement are consistent with structural requirements. The recommended minimum dimension for individual column footings is 30 inches and the recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 24 inches. All exterior footings and footings in unheated spaces should be placed at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total settlement of the foundation will be less than one (1") inch and differential settlement between adjacent • footings should be less than three-quarters (31/4") of an inch. Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations or low retaining walls with level backfill and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid -5 pressures presented below: Active: Undisturbed subsoils 40 psf/ft. Compacted granular soils 45 psf/ft. Passive: Continuous footings 350 psf/ft. An ultimate coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.45 may be used to resist lateral foundation loads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral loads, reduce the ultimate coefficient of friction to 0.35. A factor of Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 10 i. Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage _ __-lity July 28,2000 Renton,Washington • BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 safety of 1.5 should be applied\,to these values. A moist unit-weight of soil equal to 130 pounds per cubic foot should be used in design. Footings and stem walls should be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer should determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. All footing excavations at this site should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of reinforcement steel. 6.3 Slabs-or-Grade Slabs-on-grade should be supported on a minimum four-inch-thick, suitable, free-draining, sand or gravel base that follows gradation and compaction recommendations provided in this report. A vapor barrier should be included beneath the slab to minimize transmission of moisture through the concrete floor. Dowels and keyways should be evaluated for use at control joints where load transfer capability is required All concrete, especially slabs-on-grade, should be placed at minimum water-cement ratios on moistened !surfaces and properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before placing vinyl or other moisture sensitive surface treatments. 6.4 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.4.1 Site Clearing: Any existing vegetation, loose gravel fill, and any other deleterious materials s!lould be removed from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing and stripping, the exposed surfaces should be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage during construction. 6.4.2 Exc ation: Conventional-excavating equipment should be suitable for the proposed foundation excavations; however, due to the relative density and presence of coarse gravels and cobbles in the subsurface soils, reduced production rates should be anticipated. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence _ age Facility July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 According to Chapter 296-155,\Part. N of the Safety Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C soils. Therefore, side slopes of excavations deeper than four (4) feet should be no steeper than one and one-half (11/2) horizontal to one (1) vertical (11/2H:1V). If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 11/2H:1V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer should _ be contacted for additional recommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation: The need for specialized treatment of the foundation soils is not anticipated at this site. Care, however, must be exercised during excavation of the footings so as not to disturb the bearing surface. If the bearing surface is disturbed or if loose soils are encountered at the foundation depth, the soil should be moisture conditioned and compacted in accordance with the requirements presented in Paragraph 6.4.7 of this report. If loose soils are encountered to a significant depth below the foundation level, the . geotechnical engineer should be contacted immediately. 6.4.4 Slab-on Grade Preparation: The need for specialized treatment of the subgrade soils is not anticipated at this site. Care, however, must be exercised during excavation and grading of the subgrade soils so as not to disturb them. If the subgrade soils are disturbed or if loose soils are encountered, they must be moisture conditioned and compacted in accordance with the requirements presented in Paragraph 6.4.7 of this report.. 6.4.5 . Drainage: Good drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth- supported structures such as foundations, slabs-on-grade, and retaining walls. Accordingly, we recommend that a perimeter footing drain-system consisting of a perforated pipe surrounded by pea gravel be installed. The pea gravel should be separated from the surrounding soil by a filter fabric. The collected water should be tight-lined away from the building to a suitable discharge system. Roof and surface drains should be provided but they should not be connected to the footing-drain system. 6.4.6 Materials: In general, it appears that the native site soils are suitable for use as backfill and structural backfill on this site. Because of the presence of cobbles, screening of the native soils to remove the oversize material may be required. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 10 Proposed Vehic'e Evidence Storage racility July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 . If additional material is required to meet site grade, it should be imported, conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.1 , and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Samples must be submitted to the geotechnical engineer at 'least 72 hours before approval is required and before the materials are used. TABLE 6.1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL FILL 3-inch 100 3/4-inch 50-100 No. 4 25-65 No. 10 10-50 No. 40 0-20 No. 200 0-5*" *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket may be required. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.2, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. TABLE 6.2 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK BLANKET 4,_ am- .f" SYr .T,+>•4.'vn.• .n. yiYa�12r� .. "avra>. �i:jns7.3F`ni 4-inch 100 No. 200 5 maximum* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 6.4.7 Placement and Compaction: With the exception of structural backfill behind any retaining vJalls, all fill and backfill materials (structural, select, and gravel base) should be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding 10 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density as determined by the modified Proctor test (ASTM 1557). The soils should be compacted at moisture contents within three (3) percent of optimum moisture. Placement of frozen soils or placement of soils on frozen ground should not be attempted. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 8 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidenc__:rage Facility July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 . Structural backfill behind retaining walls should meet the gradation recommendations presented in Table 6.1 and should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM 1557) at moisture contents within two percent of optimum. The specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift should be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground should not be attempted. Unless these walls are designed to withstand the additional lateral loads, heavy equipment should not be operated behind the walls within a distance from the wall equal to the height of the wall. Lightweight equipment should be used to deliver backfill soil behind the wall and hand operated equipment should be used for compaction. If fill slopes are required, the fill should be overbuilt (placed and compacted well beyond the proposed slope) and the desired slope should then be cut into the compacted fill. Fill slopes may be required along the south end of the proposed site. 6.5 Surface Drainage Good surface drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth-supported structures such as foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades should be designed to prevent water from entering the foundations or gravel drains behind any retaining walls or from ponding on or next to pavements. Where pavement does not immediately abut structures, slopes, with an outfall of at least three (3) percent for a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from exterior footings, should be provided. These slopes should be capped with relatively impervious soils to prevent infiltration of water into the foundation soils. 6.6 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings performed for this project. Therefore, groundwater should not present problems during construction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 10 Proposed Vehic e Evidence Storag6, July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 . 6.7 Construction Observation clnd Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified representative. At a minimum, the testing program should include: • Observation and review of site clearing and review of all foundation excavations to • evaluate whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during exploration. • Observation and testing of placement and compaction of all fill and backfill materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. • ield inspection and laboratory testing of materials and field inspection of methods �s required by the appropriate Uniform Building Code. Typically, this includes inspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and testing of portland cement concrete to evaluate compliance with specifications regarding slump, temperature, air content, and strength. 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are for the exclusive use of the City'of Renton for the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility to be constructed at.the City of Renton Shops pro erty located at 3555 NE 2nd Street in Renton, Washington. The recommendations are based on the available subsurface information obtained by Bergquist Engineering Services, and on design details for the project provided by Lesley Wiscomb of the City of Renton. If there are any revisions to the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in thus report are encountered during construction, BES should be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the foundation recommendations are required. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations have been interpreted properly. 000 Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 10 i ae-tE, -1-1.. 7,-, 4 . . .4 , : S 4". • n I At Ni 1• . '< . ; iV. • ;• • ,-• ' CLNEAM a•SE,12TN 10 NE .` li h rHsi SE 114TM> Ito: i " • \ 41U1167101 '„ , i •. r NA • NE•TII c 1 r. _• '�� fin+.i "! --- ' I CO , liellip :Z. . /SEFis ALVA. '' .. 1.'!Lthst., .... '�, E 1 7 sr - NE SSi „ `>�- 121ST ST A : l 4,0•ht ,i�4 . wielf3 a v S 1 0 • • • .. , • 4 ' ,...• ..7 4 itedlyzitMN R TO Nr.,„ • 1, ... . . • ....4 --. 4„ ::. TIT ' i"' ,`' � � ,TFI ST SE 171TM i : '.,. snroak EtIDLoIIH.S : " ' -f 11i' sE;taaTN ST TV�� PARK!. BREEIVMU00 ;> ,M .:re �•; cc'. <` „^' - << t I EU I`r/ .; .'. NFwnae a i -fit 1, � NE :''tit r 8t"-`° °NM'S 1 _tiVar i •.'0. '; �!j I i ` � gQ sr ,„..4 i fij��i-' NE tsR :r ,. w, ,. i_ a t o a . . m • `'t ig•_. e k i cEDAA a ,` -• s- SE 131TN ; ;.�y . ' t 1 + . .e. .1.0',. s;f 44. 9 '° '' '''. 141‹.• i'jl 4 1::::7.7';:',7..7.:..7-1 +0.5E.jsQ11.1 if CI . • "') , Ini ST * . 2 abylitirt 1,1 ;-•::..:::...i:i7rrl.,.. trr le • `. .rintu,. �.y.,l� ��`C�Clitry .. ;',69 RSE.,r::..•t r ,i I1 . _A. B I .1. �'� - I VICINITY MAP Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For City of Renton Location:Renton,WA Services DES Project Number 20028 Date:July,2000 Al Existing Fence Chainlink Fence as '<. a @ IE --� j '` III r, AVM Proposed Driveway cF A Iv 0 Proposed Driveway Approximate Scale:1"=60' ® Boring Number&Approximate Location SITE PLAN Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For.City of Renton Location: Renton,WA Services DES Project Number.20028 Pate:July,2000 A2 argquist Engineering Sen • Log of boring 1 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence'.Storage Facility Drill Rig: CME 85 Location: Renton,WA Boring Size: 8"/HSA BES Project No.: 20028, RPT.1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled:July 25, 2000 Logged By: R. A. Bergctuist, PE i Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:106' Va.,ram s . .. v 04 r � after � .. ; � , ^_ �`a ue ' 5� , etc ), z 1" lay ' ca. � r ' F 4"x> -e .�.-'-✓,.� `.' 1'.e^ a..,a.F- ...,„. ' ..:L. n.n Brown GRAVEL-SANDLGOLPossible FilIZ 255 19 -- Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP) _5_ - _ 355 8 -- Brown,loose GRAVEL-SAND(GP) — 455 23 -- 10 _10 _ 555 13 -- — Drown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP) 15 15_ 655 26 -- — End of boring. Pry at completion. _ • _20_ 20 _25_ _25_ _30_ _30_ 35 _35_ A3 Be . luist Engineering Service Log of boring 2 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence'.Storage Facility Drill Rig: CME 55 Location: Renton,WA boring Size: 8"/HSA DES Project No.:20028, RPT.1 Drilled by: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled:July 25, 2000 Logged by: R. A. bergoluist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:107 w I N tzar tb.► ,.. s ; t.. 1AU -- -- - Drown GRAVEL-SANDLGPL jPossible Filll 258 25 -- Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) — 2155 - -5_ 355 9 -- Drown, loose GRAVEL-SAND (GP) _ — 455 31 -- — 10 10_ 555 21 -- Drown,medium dense to dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP),occasional cobble — _15_ _15_ 650 25 -- _ End of boring. Dry at completion. _20_ _20_ • _25_ _25_ 30 _30_ _35_ _35_ A4 •ergquist Engineering Ser.es Log of Boring 3 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence.Storage Facility Drill Rig: CME 85 Location: Renton, WA Boring Size: 8"/HSA DES Project No.: 20028, RPT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: July 25,2000 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:109' 6 n > as s Water -esc Cinioand _C i r s _ `1' _ rft Co .{ a o .. *UMW. g of ' - s . ' -� t. ' +�jE����L�6F�v�t20�!.-"�.,�-`�C`i�h!:., .J.r�����z1��?f iF. �s�: ,.L,�t�en ua�����1-��� ��,h:`�'' ' 1AU -- -- - Brown GRAVEL-SAND j 3 (Possible FillL 255 31 -- - i 5_ 5_ 355 27 -- _ — 455 25 -- Brown,medium dense to dense — 1-0_ GRAVEL-SAND(GP)occasional cobble —lO- 555 36 -- _ 15 _15_ 655 21 -- _ _ End of boring. Dry at completion. _ _20_ _20_ —2- 5— _25_ 30 30 35 35 AS BORING LOG NOTES These notes, and boring logs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The boring logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the boring on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the boring logs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. The borings were located in the field by measuring from existing site features. "Boring Size/Type" refers the diameter and type of auger used. "HSA" denotes hollow-stem auger. "SSA" denotes solid-stem auger. "BA" denotes bucket auger. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "AU" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the auger flights. • "SS" indicates split-spoon sampler with 1-3/8" inside diameter and 2" outside diameter. • "DM" indicates Dames and Moore split-spoon sampler with 2-1/2" inside diameter and 3-1/3" outside diameter. "Blows/Focr (N-Value)" refers to the number of blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches required to advance a standard sampler one-foot or a specified distance. Refusal is 50 blows for less than six inches or 25 blows without advancing the sampler. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the boring. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the boring logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. Indicates location of groundwater at the time noted. A6 BORING LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON-COHESIVE SOIL Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows/foot TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Strength Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot (tsf) Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1 .00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2.00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8-inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074mm to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm A7 • UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the#200 sieve.) GROUPISYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, GP less than 5%fines. GRAVELS Silty GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures,more More than half of coarse fraction is larger • GM than No.4 sieve. than 12%fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures, more than 12%fines. 5W Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. 5P Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND-SILT mixtures,more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller 5M fines. than No.4 sieve. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures,more than 12% fines • Note:Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50%fines. Fines are materials passing the#200 sieve) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS MI L Inorganic SILTS,very fine SANDS,ROCK FLOUR,Silty or Clayey SANDS CL Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity,Gravelly SILTS and CLAYS • CLAYS,Sandy CLAYS,Silty CLAYS,Lean CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 OL Organic SILTS,or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS,Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS,Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity,fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity pT PEAT,MUCK,and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note:Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the"A"Line and have a plasticity index(PI)of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services A8 • j , ,or Grade //// Interior Sab-on-Grade EA6n \\\ \\ \\ Tightline roof drain jFooting A. „, 4"diameter, hard, perforated pipe. Slope to drain Minimum 6"of pea or washed gravel Nonwoven filter fabric SCHEMATIC OF FOOTING DRAIN Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For: City of Renton Location:Renton,WA Services BES Project Number.20028 Pate:July,2000 A9 r- NOTES •, A10 -tip 4.4 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Pre-Application Comments o . 0 DATE: June 8,2000 04NeT T TO: Lesley Wiscomb, Capital Project Coordinator � `� ®�" 4 0- -vQ FROM: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner,x7219 ®4%® SUBJECT: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility,Pre-Application File#00-59 General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision- akers(e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board • of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$50,plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The project would construct a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on City owned property directly south of the City of Renton Public Works Shops. The proposed 12-14,000-sf metal building is expected to store approximately 30-35 vehicles • impounded by the Renton Police Department In addition to the main storage area, a small office for processing paperworlca separate fenced area for secure short-term evidence_ processing, overhead bicycle storage and a small hazardous materials storage area will be provided.,Access will be limited to Renton Police and authorized personnel. No res fs oin' facilities or heat are anticipated within the structure. - Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Institution on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned Light Industrial(P). The site is also located within the Aquifer Protection Zone 2._:The IL zone allows the warehousing and storage as a primary permitted use. The "P"suffix condition relates to notice to adjacent property owners if there is: 1) Change of Use, 2) Change of Tenant, or 3) Change of Ownership. The"P"suffix condition does not apply in this instance because the property is owned by the City of Renton, currently utilized for storage and the use will remain the same although the storage will now be enclosed within a building. Pre-App 00-59.doc\ Development Standards: The IL development standards restrict building height to 50' and lot coverage 65%of the site. The IL zone requires a 15-foot setback from street property lines and 20' setbacks on rear or side yards-which the proposal appears to satisfy. Landscapin —A 15' wide landscaped visual barrier is required from abutting residential zones. The site appears to satisfy this requirement due to the vegetated buffer along the site perimeter that screens the project from the adjacent residential uses. The formal application submittal would need to include a description of vegetated buffer to assure compliance. Screening Outdoor storage areas,if any,must be screened from adjacent or abutting properties with a fence, landscaping, landscaped berm, or combination thereof. All surface- mounted utility or mechanical equipment and rooftop equipment must be screened from public view. Screening(a minimum of 6 feet in height)must also be provided for all garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas pursuant to RMC section 4-4-09007. Dumpsters are not permitted within required setback areas, as well as within 50 feet of a residentially zoned property. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Managemeit is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. Parking—Based on the information provided,and the fact that there is no commercial use of the storage area,it appears that the use qualifies as"dead storage"which does not require additional parking spaces. However,it would benefit the project to provide parking for the maximum umber of personnel processing the evidence. Permit Requirements: The project would require Environmental(SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval_Both permits would be reviewed concurrently in an es�h'm_ated ime mP of 6 to R weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee would be$1,500,plus$.33 perm g a e require or notr cation to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. Please refer to the attached list of submittal requirements for detailed information regarding the formal land use application. In addition to the required land use permits,separate construction,building permits would be ,. required. IThe review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre-App 00-5'.doc\ City of Renton Interoffice Memo To: Steven Taylor From: Kayren K.Kittrick Date: June 8, 2000 Subject: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PreApplication Review NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the-City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers(e.g.Hearing Examiner,Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line on the City of Renton Shop site. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is modeled at 4778 gpm with a static pressure of 95 psi. Extension of the water line may be required to provide the building with fire and domestic service. 2. There are at least two fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 3. The proposed project is located in the 565 water pressure zone and in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 4. Hazardous materials being stored on site requires containment facilities for both the materials and any, spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to allow no spill to leave the building by door or drain. 5.' An operating permit and facility inspections may be required depending on the quantity and variety of hazardous materials. 6. The Water System Development Charge(SDC)does not apply to city owned properties. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch diameter sewer on the shop site. Extension may be required if sanitary service is needed. 2. The Sanitary Sewer SDC is not applied to city held properties. SURFACE WATER 1. A level one drainage study is required. Retention/detention calculations are required for this project. Water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces subject to vehicular access is required. 2. The Surface Water SDC is not assessed on city held properties. Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PreApplication Review 06/08/00 Page 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per the warehouse rate of 4.88 trips per 1000 square feet. 2. Improvements such as driveway/access paving, curb & gutter are required to meet any fire department emergency response minimums or drainage concerns. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. PLAN REVIEW 1. All.,lans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards which are attached for reference. Also attached for general information are a fee reference sheet and the King County Storm Water standards as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. A construction permit is required.When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. CC: Neil Watts CITY OF RENTON Community Services Department MEMORANDUM TO: Laureen Nicolay, Development Services FROM: Lesley Wiscomb, Capital Project Coordinator RE: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Project DATE: 09 May 2000 This is a request for a preliminary project review meeting to discuss requirements and regulations for the proposed Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility project Enclosed are plans and maps pertaining to the .proposed project in accordance with Pre- Application requirements. • PROJECT NAME: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PROJECT LOCATION: Renton Public Works Shops Site (see attached Legal Description and Aerial Photograph) • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Overview The proposed project is the construction of a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on a city-frowned parcel directly south of the City of Renton Public Works Shop site off NE 2nd Street The metal building is expected to be approximately 12,000 to 14,000 square feet and accessible to tow trucks and flat bed vehicles. The building and surrounding site improvements will occupy a project area of approximately 37,000 square feet, or an area approximately 170 feet by 215 feet. This is about 17% of the total parcel. The parcel is zoned "IL" for "Industrial — Light" and is classified as "Center Institution" on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and it is noted that Olympic pipelines (16"/20") are located across the southeast corner of the site but appear to be out of the proposed project area by a considerable distance. Current Use of Site The majority of the project area is currently fenced and used as a storage yard by Renton Public Works Department. Project area outside the fence is generally grassed or graveled. The remainder of the site is wooded with cleared areas that provide access to the King County Shops located west of the Renton Shops. Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Pre-App Page 1 • Proposed Use of the Site and Project Scope The proposed use of this site is for a metal building system facility to store evidence vehicles for the Renton Police Department. The Department currently rents space in a warehouse and stores some vehicles at the Renton Public Works Shops for this purpose. Scope of the work includes construction of the building and looped driveway to accommodate tow trucks and flat beds. It is anticipated that connections to adjacent existing utilities that serve the Renton Shops will be made as required. The Building The facility will be used to store approximately 30-35 vehicles impounded by the Renton Police Department for use as evidence. Most of these vehicles have varying degrees of damage caused by accidents and must be transported to the facility. The building will be secured by an alarm system and not open to the public. Access will be limited to the Renton Police Department personnel who process evidence and persons conducting related Police business. No restroom facilities or heat are anticipated within the structure. In addition to the main storage area, the following areas are proposed inside the facility: (1) a small office area for processing paperwork, (2) a separate fenced area for housing up to two vehicles during evidence processing, (3) an overhead storage area for bicycles, and (4) a contained area to store hazaktous materials such as gas cans, LPG containers, etc. Within the facility, the vehicles may be moved around as necessary by dollies or an automotive tow cart. Issues&questions for Consideration 1. Environmental Review: any special issues? 2. We request waiver of parking analysis due to the nature of the facility. One or two spaces are proposed in order to accommodate police officers processing the evidence. 3. Will an extensive drainage report, including TIR be required? 4. What is required to locate the facility in APA 2? 5. What will be required for fire protection in the building? The facility will be 12,000-14,000 square feet and should not require sprinklers due to adequate side yard separation. 6. We assume a Traffic Study will not be required for this project due to its nature. 7. What type of building ventilation will be required? 8. May we connect to existing utilities that serve the Shops facility? 9. What is the maximum quantity of hazardous materials allowable in our haz-mat room? Is storage of these materials in a fire-rated cabinet acceptable? Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Pre-App Page 2 • • • ?000 qAb STgAae8 Op MEMORANDUM T4'1 /5441 i' DATE: 5, — TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: f'ClCe P,�//641')C6 Wee 00,6 /uGl/i j LOCATION: S of 355 z. / & t Obseee PREAPP NO. 5q Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Ple ',submit your written comments to-- {Pn,P 4m - 1Qr no later than . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. SIZa- IS a631<Ni}7e3 C- Tt2- t 671 rUTIorJ 1rd Ti-j GOrnp L PUTh' , pI rv-J Ze crV1 1 c-fr). N PULIv; CSs-3u'3 . �r1R— S 'l .,l L P1-497W111411c._ preapp 200 G DIVISION® MEMORANDUM DATE: q'c TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: f/'CPi !'�/IdeJ* ('/ k e _OKe/l- LOCATION: b. 0 352 ►' Yiveot PREAPP NO. _ 5/ A meeting with_the applicant has been scheduled for //•.X Al'! , Thursday, \/1)r►� Kill , in one of the 6m floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal.Please submit your written comments to Sf c.,0 e4'\ T [/ C at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. P/Oor dra'hS re9c.iir Ovid of ( Separator vet, 'tiq 4;2) 9.e-,i er'?i/ re v i rc_wi a.r-kitA ara S inS.cac 12.02 , 2 is 1 , r e-- 4-k (3 e - S, J-/- Poor oor (44 0 o o C ('&'.�. fe--(' 6ra-c a4iv►1 V t- 4 Preapp2 E • RE 3 2000 CITY M.EMORANDIRFIfl" E RENTDN RTh1ENT DATE: q'a9 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prey n, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT New Preliminary Application: t i"C6 'wide/ice Ve/iC(e oefteei, (-C// p?- LOCATION: J. or 5552 ►r beo)a Sfitet PREAPP NO. trO — 5/ A meeting with, ,� CO Al'?the applicant has been scheduled for f 1 - ,Thursday, \/�ne S2 , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. • ;�3r+ t ea.c� � y.._' '_,a '� .r _ ays s e ore e mee ing. hank you. f 0,ornme•2/5 - . . .. mo (\1:43._ � Preapp2 �(CY O � , CITY OF RENTON f'P�N�C. wil FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 15, 2000 TO: Steven Taylor, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal .4"-- SUBJECT: Police Evidence Storage Facility, 3 52 NE 2nd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm monitoring system are required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. The Hazardous Materials Storage room will be required to all building and fire code requirements to include secondary containment. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portio s of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. ii 5. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 6. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7,2000 TO: Steve Taylor FROM: Carolyn Boatsman SUBJECT: Renton Police Department Vehicle Impound Facility I have reviewed the pr application package and have the following comments: The code does not prohibit such a facility in Zone 2 of the aquifer protection area. Covering the vehicles and placing them on a concrete floor provide considerable protection for the aquifer. The code requires secondary containment of hazardous materials. I would recommend that this facility be constructed with a floor that serves as secondary containment for substances that may leak out Qf vehicles. The applicant could slope the floor towards the middle or construct a barrier around the perimeter of the floor. I would prefer that the facility not have floor drains that lead either to ;he sanitary or storm sewer. Floor drains imply that spills will be allowed to go down the drain. Spills should not be allowed to go down a drain but should be absorbed using any of the many products designed for that purpose. The floor can then be washed and the wastewater disposed of in a sink. However,if the Uniform Building Code requires a floor drain and oil/water separator, I suppose that would be OK given that spills in this case will be almost exclusively petroleum products which will be mostly removed by the oil/water separator. Code requirements for construction activity, wastewater, stormwater, and fill quality provide additional protection of the aquifer. The facility may need to obtain an Aquifer Protection Area Operating Permit. The threshold is 20 gallons of hazardous materials on the premises. The permit is free and is granted on an annual basis after an inspection. The inspection is to verify that secondary containment requirements are met, that procedures are in place to respond to spills, that employees are trained, etc. It would also be required that the operator provide the Water Utility with an inventory of hazardous materials. Please contact me at x7211 should you have further questions. Thank you for bringing this project to my attention. cc: Abdoul Gafour C:\WIN WS\TEMP\st0600xx.doc\st INTERFUND TRANSFER Transfer Number. Date: 4/3%2 )2-- General Description: • % eilet- Lawedwid L GL - Ge,crr ta4 Department To Be Charged (Transfer Out-From) 3rr/r. (5-G1/ • Description Account Number WO/Function Amount Dzi Wp> -..t-52 iti7V ;3llo 4, oaO Se , 6a2,40,2t0p /• -± Department Authorization: / .y Grg-- DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • APR 3 0 2002 Department To »' ;.•'% `'` r'ransfer In - To) Q°W. Description Account Number WO/Function Amount SikP e once.3�¢5 at .00.0 i 7 5SOao /pV,OU • 1/1K eA) craws-. 8/.JO, 0007 5V/o 522, t' Pakirir y coo.Os:57q,go.lt z, d —> 5955 Distribution White: Finance Department Yellow Department,to be Charged ' Pink: Department to be Credited I I '._,_TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 04-30-2002 I Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-052 Payment Made: 04/30/2002 04:38 PM Receipt Number: R0202391 Total Payment: 1,501.02 Payee: IOT Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code I Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00[0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5020 000.345.81.00I[0017 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 5955 000.05.519.901[42.1 Postage DEVELOPMENT P 1.02 CITY OF RENTONING Payments made for this receipt APR 3 0 L`2) Trans Method Description REE- Amount ECPayment Other 1, 501.02 Account Balances Trans Account Code ' Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.0010002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.000004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.001.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review . .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008,.Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat • .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD ,.00 5014 000.345.81.000011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00,.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.001.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00'.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00..0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.001.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Proposed site is directly south of and accessible from the entrance to the Renton City Shops on 3555 NE 2nd Street, Renton. The project area on this parcel is the northern portion adjacent to the City Shops site. Part of the project area is presently fenced and used as a City Shops stockpile area. This site is in the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16,Township 23 North, Range 5 East. Legal description,site plan,and vicinity map are attached to this Checklist as part of the Environmental Review application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one) - oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Note that there are steep slopes on the perimeter of the site that will be unaffected by this proposal. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 4.5%within the project area and approximately 30%on the project site which will be unaffected. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The surface of the site is covered with about one foot of brown gravel-sand,which is suspected to be fill material. Underlying the surface fill and extending down about fifteen feet is brown, loose to dense gravel-sand with occasional cobbles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading operations will be limited to 42,776 square foot area to correspond with surrounding existing grades and to accommodate the building slab. It is anticipated that any fill will be limited to that on site or that imported for base course to be used under structures and pavement. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is not expected to occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Page 2 ; • Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Approximately 18,832 square feet or 8.5% of the total parcel will be covered with impervious surface at the completion of the project. Impervious areas include asphalt vehicular routes, pathways to the building entry, and the building slab. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Industry accepted erosion control measures and other construction practices will be used to reduce impacts during construction. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, I odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction,dust and emissions from construction equipment are anticipated. After project completion,occasional automobile emissions from authorized vehicles and towing vehicles are anticipated. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) I Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) ' Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are anticipated. 5) I Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain. If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Page 3 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes. Storm water will be discharged to ground water. Diversion of site storm water runoff to a bioswale is proposed. The purpose of the bioswale is to trap sediments and filter impurities from storm water runoff to remove contaminants before runoff enters the ground water. Storm water runoff from impervious areas of the site will be discharged to the ground water after completing this filtration process in the bioswale. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. It is not anticipated that waste material from septic tanks or other sources will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water ' flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of the runoff is expected to be storm water from rainfall. The method of collection is roof drains on the building and controlled grades on the paved areas that will direct the runoff to a bioswale where impurities will be filtered out before being discharged into the ground. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. It is not anticipated that waste material will enter ground water or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water runoff will be directed to a bioswale where impurities may be filtered out before the water enters the ground. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other Note: There are no trees within the project area. The trees checked above are on the steep slope east of the site and on the southern portion of the site. Page 4 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility b. What kind and amount of vegetation will-be removed or altered? Vegetation slated for removal will be limited to grass and weeds. Existing trees are NOT affected by this proposal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The bioswale and surrounding areas disturbed during construction will be planted with grass. II 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other squirrels_ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. • 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to complete the project's energy needs. The electricity will be used for ventilation, lighting, power, and the alarm system. No heating system is anticipated in this facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No energy conservation features are planned. The in ground installation of all service cables and conduits are proposed to reduce or control energy impacts. Page 5 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes. Risk of spills from damaged vehicles is possible. It is anticipated that spills would be limited to petroleum products and by-products normally found in automobiles. However, vehicles subject to leaks are normally drained of fuels and other products during evidence-processing before being stored at this facility. Contained hazardous materials that are seized, as evidence, will also be stored in this building. It is expected that these will generally be limited to gas cans, LPG containers, and other materials that are not permitted to be stored at the Police Department's Evidence Room in City Hall. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police personnel trained in special emergency services related to hazardous materials will be permitted to enact procedures to deal with unforeseen environmental health hazards at this facility. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A containment sump in the floor of this building is proposed which will pump contents to a containment drum. This will allow authorized personnel to clean up any spills that may occur. It is anticipated that proper disposal of the contents of the containment drum will be handled by Police personnel on a regular basis. It is proposed that contained hazardous materials seized as evidence will be stored in flammable liquid safety cabinets installed as part of this project. These cabinets will be accessible by authorized Police personnel only and comply with ASHA and NFPA Code 30 specifications. b. Noise 1) I What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term construction noise will occur,generally between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm. When the facility is operational, occasional vehicular noise is anticipated. Page 6 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise will be limited to normal construction hours, 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The City of Renton presently uses the proposed project area on the site as a materials stockpile/laydown yard. There is a partially paved and gravel road running through the site that is used by both the City of Renton and King County to access King County Shops area. This route will not be affected by the project. The remainder of the site is vacant land. Adjacent to the site, north, is the City of Renton Public Works Shops facility.To the east is vacant land at the toe of a steep wooded slope and single-family manufactured homes located at the top of the slope. West of the site is the King County Shops area. South of the site is generally vacant wooded land. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a fence around the perimeter of the stockpile/laydown area. No other structures are present. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes,the fence described in 8.c.(Above)will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IL: Industrial-Light(P) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center Institution g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. However,the site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside at the site. Only Renton Police personnel and authorized visitors would work at the site on an as needed basis. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Page 7 • Environmental Checklist - Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: I None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The ridge height of the building roof is proposed to be 22'-6"at elevation 130'. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views to the wooded land to the south of the project area would be obstructed from the Renton City Shops site by the proposed building. Views from the top of the slope to the east will be moderately altered with the addition of this building. However, long range views will not be affected. c. , Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare from headlights entering the facility after dusk and light from the building exterior after dusk will be produced by this proposal. It is not anticipated that light and glare would impact adjacent land users. b. Could light or glares from the finished project become a safety hazard or interfere with views? It is not anticipated that light or glare will interfere with views or be a safety hazard. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. Page 8 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 12. RECREATION • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. r Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local ' preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • • None known. • • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by a principal arterial —'NE 4th-Street to a collector — NE 2nd Street. These arterial routes may be accessed from Interstate 405 or NE Sunset Blvd. b. I Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest transit stop is on NE 4th Street,over a mile away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Two spaces reserved for authorized personnel are proposed. The project will not eliminate any parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Improvements will be limited to paving the existing access driveway as required to match existing grades. This driveway is gated and used solely by authorized King County and City of Renton personnel. • Page 9 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection; police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. UTILITIES a. , Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other-none. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities are as follows: • Electricity from Puget Sound Energy. • Telephone from US West. It is anticipated that upgrade in electrical service will be made to the adjacent Renton City Shops metal storage buildings and new service for the proposed facility will be drawn from the upgraded panel. General construction activities associated with this work will include trenching, installation of conduit,wiring,and panel. Telecommunications line installation for telephone, alarm system and computer services will be installed from the nearest and most economical source. General construction activities associated with this work will be similar to those associated with the new electrical service. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Tracy M. Coleman, Project Manager Date: 1 Page 10 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS 1 (These- sheets should only be used for. actions involving; decisions on, policies, plans•'=and' programs.;„You>do""notneed.to fill out-these sheets for project actions:) F Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, • storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. Nov.! would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,flood plains, or prime farmlands? it Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • Page 11 Environmental Checklist Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility II Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willf U I lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 • Page 12 •5 DRAINAGE REPORT RENTON POLICE VEHICLE EVIDENCE FACILITY J RENTON, WASHINGTON DATE: April 24, 2002 D.,II" r wAs F<o i H IIK h -z 4A�0) 2 10 u�' c2aT� 'l ti / QS° 6? elC3 `EXPIRES 23 DEC 7/7223. • • • • • DRAINAGE REPORT SECTION I- PROJECT OVERVIEW RENTON POLICE VEHICLE EVIDENCE FACILITY RENTON, WASHINGTON The project site is located along the east side of the access road extension in Renton, Washington. The site currently is an undeveloped vacant lot in the City of Renton Public Utilities site. The proposed development consists of constructing a one-story building and asphalt driveway. The building will be a pre-fabricated metal building with a footprint area of 9,900 square feet and the asphalt driveway will be approximately 8,932 square feet. The main floor level is designated for vehicle evidence storage. Parking is located near the northeast corner of the building. Storm water detention is required by the City of Renton for this project using the King County,Surface Water Design Manual. All surface water will be detained on-site and infiltrated so that it will not impact water downstream. The infiltration pond will provide some water quality treatment through the surface soil and vegetation. A filter strip will also be provided as the water quality facility to remove pollutants by filtration through grass blades. The sediment in the runoff will adhere and be trapped by the filter strip vegetation. Roof drains will convey stormwater to the on-site infiltration pond. Footing drains will collect groundwater which will be conveyed to the on-site facility in a separate tight line. The driveway will be sloped to allow sheet flow of the stormwater runoff to the filter strip. The top area of the pond will be approximately 23'x50'. The pond will have an emergency spillway which will convey the 100 year 24 hour design storm event to the natural surface outlet. 2K114 Drainage Rpt.doc 4/24/2002 • Pacific • Project No: 214II q Date: y j?. �0'7. Sheet: Of: Engineering Project Name: 7 ,&a •a' Pgar.=,,'. Technologies . • Comp.By: t PP - Chk.By: 1300 Dexter Avenue North-Suite 100 0 Seattle,Washington 98109 • Telephone: [206]281.7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281-4611 Contents: [800]621-7300 . I r ! I 1 1 ] ' i L6'V C-1-,.oil _ ' (?/t),')%✓/iG !_s 0 9 -- - - -�--4 i ! ' -9`.. W -VER_1-CZ 0AL11�Y,. ileti�i'lle. -f� .f ----. ._I_._.1, '� `ke_A �a - vi". # <,QL ig-- ",9 ,`14 ] `)� 11 I ' I 1 i .i " I t1 a P.J $ 6 1� r t f A I Ii i l 1 { hfiv I. i i ' i.3`�i. t�tn,..l._.... �.t _.. CyC�._ ''{._. - -.. ,� �..... _._.... _ 1._._ .:. i ._.._.I.._...L... ! i ... I . I I , i ( 1 , ' I I 1 •, ! 1 I I I 1'. _, j 1 ; , 1 r _ _ E�_<: . ems.) .. . _ 1 r--* —-"� —� r ] — o l 2 �. —= - — I —— —i— — - i off; r� 1 I il I _ ' f l T I • l I". i — i I I a � i — i 1 I i I 1 i • i f i 1 I I I I I 1 I . I i II } I_ I. `- iI ; i 1 i 44i I I i : I 1 • I I i i I ' I �� • � � i I iv I 1 I 1 1 i : : : i. I I • i _ ' : : : I i I I i � I I I 1 II : I I I i I i : : 1 ---1 1---�_ 1 ! j I I j , : i4/22/02.03:12:02 FM • • • • :i'tii:::'r':.'ii{;±i:>.:iiiiiviiii:ivv?;:`vi'iiy}ii::i ::'r:>.:i'r::i:�} i:>.•}:8:•:tr:;>.+vv v::::.:vty. CREATE a new Time Series g00: :A391 f3;saAA13j ""IN r i#EE`:i<lg Production of Runof • f Time Series . ,•`i:i:i �:'i:.i iriii;i;r::':;:::'i:.i:3i`i?'?' iE'�iEE•'i�E: s ?I( flrUil ........................ Project Location Sea-Tao :�: Computing Series,: 2k114d.tsf P 4 :%Re Tonal Scale Factor 1.00 g , ,C om u:u: # ?`: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,%?%ii5i %L Lx.x.i i s i i. Data Type' : Reduced ....M ... _N SAIVIMd• :;::': E%Creatin4 Hourly Time Series File L'adin Time Series File:C:`KC SWDM\KC DATA\STTP6kir<z°%:'•::: •:::,• .1 '.!:.. :•.....•:: �.• ..... :.+•+•..`:... .::::<•>:::•:; o g _ _ Till Pasture 0.42 acres Scaling Yr: B Series File:C:\KC SWDM\KC DATA\STEI6[:'`' `.''.':''.`.:'.:`.`' 4..................................................................:: Loading Time Impervio us 0.42 acres Adding Yr: 8 'YMESiiii:S%:::::: ::::%tr#:: :yr r: `f',:# :,-..33 f2'Srr .....„<; Total Area : 0.84 acres iPeak Discharge: 0.249 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 r StoringTime Series File:2k11+:?i: : <:::?:Ei:#ii.,.':`i:.`:'.' :'.:':..:.::...::''::::: ...:�:.....:.....:::...... IIIIIIE:E:f::2:�f%til`..,UL# ''• 1ii#'<i `i ;;i;'si•;EiE::%:i:isi:E '<:'r'i:i:i:: E•" Time Series Computed KCRTS Command tt Sr'i2�:f:% Y G �D:f viiiii :1464R1EEE EE E z'si'.:::::.:. • Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Y Analysis Tools Command iii Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies :.' , ir Loading Stage/Discharge curve:2k114d.tsf . Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:2k114d.tsf f#s is Project Iocation:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:2k114d.pks : '$ •, tom.;... .....;; ,'.' ;� ;\;�;ti...,...,tkti....;;;;;;;,y:;;,t><:;�i:�:::>::iSS:�;:;:::::is�i:::::iS:;:<:;•isb::•5::;;•::•::t•:;:•::i::•:Si:,••>:•f:'<i;:FXtYY;2:;:;;5:::::::;::;•:>:::v;;t•>::;•;::;;:;:;�;>:;;>::::;:>::::�:;;•>:;:;c:a:•:;;�::;::�>;:i:<;:;•:::�:5.`•y;:455;�;:;•r:;:;:<:•::::::.:•: ..K.. �. k\�\��\,�.�.* v \ \vvxixx�:??iiiv isv{{{:;:'r??iiiiii:�}i'}iiv:•vi}ii:iiiii::ii::is�iiiii:iiCii;`viiji}iceiY�iiiiiii iiiiY:4:•i:•:•ii}v�:iiii:+isijj};4:itiii:ti:ii:4:jjj} :>itiiiiii'r}ji'r}iiiii:tt+?:•i:i•}i`i%iw::::::::.,v:. . :�+et.oCa t�\ ank �aAQ\,}.\. v s 's ea'k:.:.:x....... ........ ............. .......w:n::::::::::.............................................>`y:yiii:<':vii.i.i::i::iii}iii:i:::................. +�?+:" :; 6`3ow Rate �ank �ime of �ea�t - - Pealcs - - Rank 12turn Prob �•���� (CFS) (CFS) Period 0,.125 6 2/09/01 2:00 IT2325 1 100.00 0.990 0.100 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.154 2 25.00 0.960 0.147 3 2/27/03 7:00 EMI 3 10.00 0.900 0.106 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.134 4 5.00 0.800 0.128. 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.128 5 3.00 0.667 /� 0.134 - - 4 1/18/06 16:00 10.125`1 6 2.00 0.500 2)SP peak -Ao4J i...: • 0.154 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.106 7 1.30 0.231 0.249 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.100 8 1.10 0.091 ...........PP..L._....._.... ' ..: -..»_....... _.. . n_.7 7... .. .. .........Sn, nn.....n .4pn.. Rin igN :•;c\ felt,.y>: :.:t•::• �k8x�..:..: :.1.: . sxnl .:.:..1�Wiz.. . .. ............ 3 ....... ...{... :.;:�..........:..�%:�>:...: .4PPOP044rW�YFtt............:......::.:...:i.........}�n..�l•1•f..it �.L�t..Hit• t.ti��lit.., �,iii•t�9t tt;n'::•I�tl'il�::iY�:%��'trMii-qf Pacific ��/ 02 Sh Engineering ?K Project No: I IH . Date: / eet: Of: :.,. Project Name: E,41-0, ' . . - Technologies .. Comp.By: E 09 . .. ; :,;::,, _.;.: Chk:By: . •, ..:5 .. . . 1300 Dexter Avenue North—Suite 100 0 Seattle.Washington 98109• Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281.4611 Contents: INF l..1 OAT ?cyv o [800]621-7300 I ±�, I I . - - SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TEST DATA -- TEST NUMBER. . •:.. P1 ,.: P2 `. .: P3 AVERAGE PERCOLATION 6.25 min./inch 1 .48 min./inch 4.65 min./inch iNC ev4, t:' v4cH I RATE �I I I The average percolation rate of the site soils as determined by these tests is 4.1 l.• ') d, r— minutes per inch. Using a factor of safety of two, an infiltration rate of 8.2 minutes per 1 { inch may be used in design of this detention pond. I • I i l:v i.ilLT of. D i -i- - 1 i i ! i ! 1 scMe .sc : . CD i. ] 1 f } I ` j i I i i ' jo _ — • — ] ! i ' j i i I 1 • I I —I— i --- -- - i . ; 1 . 1 [ .. j. { i I - -- . L___F__ ' 1 -- - -1-`-4-----L' I , I. ! T } ; i i i 1 04/24/02.09:37:i 6 AM - . P�use?d.�:#!el::���eS.:�Kt11#5.}}:.}:;.:;.}}:.}>}}>}>:.}:.}}:<.;::.;:.;:.}:.}:.}.;:.}:.:;.::::.}::.>:.;:.»:.:}::::.: ��/ /�/�. ,s, � \..,..:.��}:•.::.::::::.:: � .. � '?t Peak Year 1 changed from rank 6 to 5 Peak Year 2 changed from rank 8 to 7 Peak Year 3 changed from rank 3 to 4 Peak Year 4 changed from rank 7 to 8 Peak Year 5 changed from rank 5 to 6 Peak Year 6 changed from rank 4 to 2 Peak Year 7 changed from rank 2 to 3 Step:4b (1 of 7) Route to FOC; Iterate in Event Window Step:4c (1 of 7) Route All Hydrographs Step:4d (1 of 7) Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.0128 Step:4a (2 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] ::: Ranked peaks that have, changed: 'None, Step:2a Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Initializing ranked peaks. Step:2b Route to POC; Iterate in Event Window Step:2c Route All Hydrographs Step:3 Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.911 '''':.: Step:4a (1 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Ranked peaks that have, changed: None Step:4b (1 of 7) Route to POC; Iterate in Event Window Step:4c (1 of 7) Route All Hydrographs Step:4d (1 of 7) Route Timeseries to Point of Compliance Route Time Series Facility Length=31.911 Step:4a (2 of 7) Select dates for Iteration Hydrograph [ 1 month window] Ranked peaks that have changed: None Type of r'acility: lntiltration Pond Side Slope: 3.UU H:1V Pond bottom Length: 31.91 it Pond bottom Width: 3.19 it Pond bottom Area: 1U2. sq. it lop Area at 1 it. iA'b: 1b2U. sq. it U.U3b acres Effective Storage Depth: 3.UU it Stage U Elevation: 99.UU it Storage Volume: lb•!•/. cu. it U.U36 ac-tt Vertical Permeability: 8.2U min/in Permeable Surtaces: bottom k Sides Riser Head: 3.UU it Riser Diameter: 6.UU inches Top Botch Weir: None Outflow Hating Curve: None Click Right Mouse Button or Press Any Key to continue ::' • • :::....................... ................ ...............:....................n.. ...............M' .' :: 4:^:•!•i^}}}•i:?4i:•} r.}..; v?•y.,•?.;:•.;:+.a??•%j•:t?j?r •::tr:•i:•i:{....,,}•?i{ii:•i'Jr}:•H:M(•};::.; .. ..:.::: :::. •: : .:: :. .,..✓:.:.::::::.:..:.. ...::v:::v::::...•., ............/. .: ::•}:•}:{•}:•i:4:•}:4ii•}:4::4}}•;•::'.: : .}:•} !.}}:ad}}:- i' �:• , ••,: 4,:}?.v:n::y:• �tarN.::.':°,.; ...� .. he 6 Y.ier. ec rlr:�>:»r•:» R�u��9.....: •,: n r ::.�i :;.i::.; . .. ....s<,.try. ..,....;.;..� .?I...4-r�!#;:;<>::% .... paus.ed...::: �....4..}.} •;::>:�>:�>:�>:�>:»>::>•}:•}:>•}:..,,F :; ;;;• .... . . •�`•>�t���t�l.:< :M4Lii?K'>If: ::•:•^:^•}:•:�.2<�: }hR4:4i:4:�3:i:•}!wn�f:i?ii?i???•P4iM• �.?�W::.i??ii? •M/�iSvS?94i%k'A54%�'�it?r'.I:i•i:i f?ii $'�... ..'.........�I.•:•}:4:;:�:4:4:•i:�:4:4i}}}ik.�:: 7.pk: ::::::::::::::::.f/............ .,..,•......,•......... Pacific • Project No: 7 MINI . Date: 1/2yIO2. Sheet: Of: Engineering Technologies Project Name: �� Pooch.: • . ® Comp.By: e D f _ , . _ Chk.By: . 1300 Dexter Avenue North-Suite 100 0 Seattle,Washington 98109 `�� Telephone: 1206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:[206]281.4611 Contents: F I Lr g c` ‘F, . [800]621-7300 1 ; 1 • -1 FIGURE 6.3.4.A FILTER STRIP TERMINOLOGY h t •direction. • contributing_3-. o�: I '; 1 : offlow. .�—drainage area':. : I . -.-J_ cts : .4} i I _ I ._-- : 4}: — lateral slope -0 : — I i i J�S�,L�-941,,c3�o uQGrS�;Jo up CJ ";moo up U vo,o up CJ I I ! i \J, 4` \,f, 4' .,f. 4' ,.f. 4' ,f. 4' vie 4' vf, v�, i filter strip length"L" I i +G \J, \J, \J, \J. \J. \J, _h_l--_ ! � _ ! ,— strip width "W" l _ I i ___ L , , , ! i j i ] i i .1 I ______I 1 1 l t—' = - 2k114 Renton Police Evidence Facility i i 1 , 1 _ I use V-a �clv_. R _ - - I T Filter Strip Requirements I I ` ! { .EA I.2 R4crI i f _-_— Q2yr= 0.052 (KCRTS) • ___ Qwq= 0.0312 i i i i ( 1 nwq= 0.35 ! i W= 105 ( - i � � 1 I - -1--= s= 0.1 !+—.—_— �— _ _— df= 0.006 I— ! ! i j Vwq= 0.046 ; • i I 1 L= 25.064 , ` i I I j 1 -- —_______1 -- 1 1 �� r I [ L 1 I 1 { ! 1 1 1 i I i I ! 1 i , I i Pacific • • Project No: 2 KW-1 Date: 91211/O2- Sheet: Of: . Engineering • Project Name: Rcii bW ?l�LIC ` . Technologies P' y1 By:. 1300 Dexter Avenue North-Suite 100 0 Seattle.Washington 98109. r Telephone: [206]281-7500 0 Facsimile:1206]281-4611 Contents:`;=:;P I L.1' Z '• '..l it 1P [800]621 7300.- I I I I ! j I . FIGURE 6.3.4.A FILTER STRIP TERMINOLOGY 1 I I I ! I ,1 1 I 1 I [ I r direction. ' contributing_is: o I 1 1 1 I I { of:flow. .e—drainage area : f I `- lateral slope =o I I —] ---L— ' I I I 'f `'-;J4�q-7 ��UQU -'��a ;�,,,a�o U ";?o up j I -j 4, `�, r. 4, „r. 4' r. 4, 4f, � I I—J — < �I < filter strip length L" ��' ��' i I — I• —' _ ,�, 4 1 4, `4' 4, vi, 44, •1, vi, w, 4, 4. 4J, \' 1 i ! „r `i, r , 4, „r 4, „r 4d, „r 4, „r 4, „r "< -' I I I_T I I strip width "W" j I I ---- I I I • • I I . 1 I L —_ I { [-- 1 1 } T + -;-i 11 -1- -- I I1 1 1 I 1 1 ( ' I ( I I+._'- _ __I '- I t 1 ] - — _ t I 1 1. i I t - - - 1 • _1 = - 2k114 Renton Police Evidence Facility T G { 1 !, — 1- use" , V_Fakt icy-1 ACC"-5 - Filter Strip Requirements T I r — Q2yr 0.052 (KCRTS) I i 1 i 1 1 Qwq= 0.0312 I 1 - - nwq= 0.35 j i ± W 105 s= 0 �.1 ' 1 — - df= 0.006 l I- 1 _ ( I Vwq= 0.046 I ' _ ' 1 ! + I— ( I L= 25.064 !-1- I II I i , � i 1 ! 1 � i i I i I ^�-_I ( I I I .-. ! I. I I 1 I I i 1 1 I I i 1 ! j .I. I I .L. I -__+ 04/24/02 01:36:43 PM ....................................................................................................................................... f /. .}:.4 Div::•,`*:;iii;•ii::;' ,f:.•}.. .1GT�:2::�>:�ii::�i:is�ii:`;�i:�:;:is� :�;}::iii:�:;:iii:�::�::;�;:;;.'•::::�::�:r}`:::::•i:::i:;>:<:}:;::�:;::;:�}2:::�:t:�::�:is:: € tF fS 2{ Ap OPZIERigitg XCRTS Command .. t!!: CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series, : 2k114drv.tsf !! :Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced ;;Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SYDM\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8 3;Impervious 0.21 acres Scaling Yr: 8 '''.i ; Total Area : 0.21 acres Ir pi t hOUS Peak Discharge: 0.099 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 iI Storing Time Series File:2k114drv.tsf 8 Time Series Computed ' ...:i..:::::::::::::::: KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command o Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies • Loading Stage/Discharge curve:2k114drv.tsf . Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:2k114drv.tsf ii Project Location:Sea-Tac : :I. is`, Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:2k114drv.pks M, \ ?:•^\ \ A.. 4: ��\:>.<?��:i?�?i•`.i`^?%ii:?:i�i;:}is ii�iiiii+i:iiiiiiiii:}:::jiijii;;{;:i:•:i4:;•}:•}:}:^:4:•}:•}}}};;.}}}}; }}}isi:};.;4 }}:4:i;4:•:�:•}}};x};;4'•y}}v.;;;y:}Lv::3i}iiiii:i<i:>:'}: �:Za•��NN��..pp �, \ .vx4:nw:::::::::x:::::::::.�.�.:........:........:...:•:•.w:::::w...w::.::w}::,%::::: .:�::::::.:�::::.�::.:�}:::}:...:}................:... :��y+oo�oopp• ; �v •+.\ ^\. ,:'\ \*\,\,xx:,,.\�: 1: \v:E\:h:vi}:is:•}}:... :::hE:::::::\v::}.. ..•.� ::kx.:::::w.w::::.�:::::::.:w.�w. �w::::::::.�:::::::n..� a as :and\ �Time Peak .a \ ti tu..... .P.:o:::::.�::::::::: ow 'ate 'an ime o ea - - Peaks - - Rank Return P`rob"""`'"` •" ir;;;i (CFS) (CFS) Period 0..051 7 2/09/01 2:00 0.099 1 100.00 0.990 0.045 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.076 2 25.00 0.960 0.062 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.062 3 10.00 0.900 0.052 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.062 4 .5.00 0.800 0.062. 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.054 5 3.00 0.667 0.054 - ' 5 1/18/06 16:00 J 0.052, 6 2.00 0.500 2w- PERK 0.076 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.051 7 1.30 0.231 0.099 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.045 8 1.10 0.091 iif omnnhorl pP.aU .. . ..._.i ... .... ..... ... .n..ng2_... .... ..... . .Sn. nn. .n.gnn - }}}: arC....�� :I Yli r fEB.,.., x i:s: K!# ikizr:::: :"':. % fet:;i f: :n•S: ...I'...'::.�:. .,,,..b......ri.4............ �SiA. :»>. .KCR75.......... ..O. ... ....:. ..„....O............. :. :i}::•}:. •:s....... ;:1.:'3£�'{tiiiEE>EE .i:;•.i;�;••:::I:•:::::::::;:::::.�:::::::::::::�•::�...•.H..:•,.I,Si444Y.•,�A4�fi,i,:•.f•.•E•••i•,Yn'?t..,,..•���..,..•.••��f �,�•. •ii•ii f��OP•;;f d�.. SCHEDULE A COMMITMENT NO. EFFECTIVE DATE OF COMMITMENT: A-284124 U-13 NOVEMBER 3, 1981 AT 8:00 A.M. YOUR NO.: KING COUNTY PREPARED, FOR: CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH CFV RENTON, ;WASHINGTON 98055 Coy8 rp�� ATTN: DON MONAGHAN NT�NNIve INQUIRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: APR3U l 410 PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ECEIVED 719 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ATTN: JON M CROSS DIRECT DIALING ( 2061 223-7906 1. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNERS/PURCHASERS POLICY - FORM B - 1970 COVERAGE: STANDARD AMOUNT ' : S450,000.00 PREMIUM ' : S1,084.00 TAX , : $58.54 PROPOSED INSURED: CITY OF RENTON. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST IN SAID LAND IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: KING COUNTY A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON A-284124 PAGE 1 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING,, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCIING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTER OF SECTION LINE SOUTH 89' 01' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 683.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1' 04' 13" EAST 363.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1' 04'13" EAST A DISTANCE 960 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 89' 03' 38" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 642.05 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 1' 00'49" WEST ALONG EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE 960 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 03 '38" WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 643 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A 60 FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: THE EAST 60 FEET OF THE WEST 713.33 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE EAST 373.33 FEET OF THE WEST 653.33 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ALSO TOGETHER WITH A 60 FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE WEST 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DACP 7 • SCHEDULE B 1. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: A. INSTRUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREATE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE PROPERLY EXECUTED, DELIVERED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD. 11 SCHEDULE B OF THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, ' CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES FOR VALUE OF RECORD THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 2. LIEN OFFREAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. 3. GENERAL TAXES ARE SHOWN AS EXEMPT ON THE GENERAL TAX ROLLS FOR THE YEAR 1981 BEING COUNTY TREASURER'S PARCEL NO. 162305-9123-03 4. CONTRACT OF SALE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS, AND THE EFFECT OF ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY THEREWITH: SELLER : KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NORTHWEST PURCHASER : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DATED : AUGUST 18, 1981 RECORDED : SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 AUDITOR' S FILE NO.: 8109020591 5. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. FOR : PIPE LINE IN FAVOR .OF : JAMES TACHELL RECORDED : SEPTEMBER 4, 1928 AUDITOR'S NO.: 2486007 AFFECTS : THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE • SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, INCLUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH A-711L1 76 PA(.F A • HAVINGS FIVE FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, WHICH IS SOUTH 88° 48'45" WEST 249.5 FEET DISTANT FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 6' 01' EAST 1983.8 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER WHICH IS NORTH 36' 22' 30" WEST 2430.8 FEET DISTANCT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 5' 50' WEST 200 FEET TO THE TERMINAL POINT OF THIS DESCRIPTION. 6. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHEREBY SAID GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OILS, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING MINES, ETC., PROVIDED THAT NO RIGHTS SHALL BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY. AUDITOR' S NO.: 4189945 7. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. FOR : SANITARY SEWER LINE IN FAVOR OF : CITY OF RENTON RECORDED : JANUARY 22, 1979 AUDITOR'S NO. : 7901220622 AFFECTS : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, CONTAINED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, THE THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER 81 FEET, THENCE NORTH . 89° 03'38" WEST 35 FEET TO A SEWER MANHOLE APPURTENANT TO A 12 INCH SEWER PIPELINE, DESIGNATED AS MH NO. 14 WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 89' 03'38" EAST 1146 FEET TO MH NO. 10. THENCE NORTH 81' 20'00" EAST 268 FEET TO MH NO. 9, THENCE NORTH 62' 20'00" EAST 76 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE END OF THIS DESCRIPTION. TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH EXTENDING 15 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ABOVE DESCIRBED CENTERLINE. SAID MATTER MAY BE MERGED WITH THE RECORD TITLE. • 8. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES-. A_)0i.1 DACP 4 FOR : SANITARY SEWER LINE IN FAVOR OF : CITY OF RENTON RECORDED : JANUARY 1, 1979 AUDITOR'S NO. : 7902010676 AFFECTS : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, CONTAINED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH AND 5 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, 1361 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A 12 INCH SEWER PIPELINE. SAID MATTER MAY BE MERGED WITH THE RECORD TITLE. 9. WE NOTE A RECORD OF SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WE HAVE MADE NO DETERMINATION AS TO ITS EFFECT ON THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY AND NO INSURANCE IS GIVEN ON THE BASIS OF THE LINES OF PROPERTY AS SHOWN THEREBY, BUT NOTHING APPEARS OF RECORD BY WHICH COULD BE CONSIDERED AN ALTERATION OF THE EXISTING RECORD DESCRIPTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED HEREIN. RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1981 BOOK 26 PAGE 261 AUDITORS NO. : 8102269001 10. IN ADDITION TO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SHOWN ABOVE, THE OWNER' S POLICY APPLIED FOR WILL CONTAIN AS EXCEPTIONS IN SCHEDULE B THEREOF, THOSE PARTICULAR STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WHICH ARE PRINTED ON THE INSIDE BACK COVER HEREOF AND DESIGNATED PARAGRAPH( S) : A THRU J NOTE: THE OWNERS POLICY TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN ENDORSEMENT( S) : WA: 10 NOTE: INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. p.. NOTE: A CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ALL CHARGES AND ADVANCES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE PROVIDED AT CLOSING. A_711t.174 DAaP • NOTE: IN EVENT THE TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE AND THIS COMMITMENT IS CANCELLED, A FEE WILL BE CHARGED TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE INSURANCE CODE AND THE FILED SCHEDULE OF THIS COMPANY. RW/OW 235 • i The Company has not surveyed the premises described in A Z24/Z4- The sketch below is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company-assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show all highways, roads and easements adjoining or affecting said premises. h W vi j a E 1 w - 0 I ' , • 5 A S.E. /3ZATD 5r. TGW E S A X T G /2.os I 6d • a • ( 0 j j g r k 613 • IP • v: Berg ist Engineeringineerin Services Ja J J 32240 8th Avenue SW P.O. Box 25804 Federal Way Washington 98023 Federal Way, Washington 98093 Phone: 253.661 .7658, Fax: 253.661 .1399, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com August 22, 2000 Lesley Wiscomb Community Services City of Renton p Renton City Hall - 5th Floor p/�o� p 1055 South Grady Way RFM p��/NG Renton, Washington 98055 APR 3 470 RECE Re: Percolation Testing of Near Surface Soils ike® Proposed Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility 3555 NE 2"a Street • Renton, Washington BES Project Number: 20031, Report 1 Dear Lesley: As requested, Bergquist Engineering Services provided geotechnical engineering services related to design of the proposed detention pond for the referenced project. Based on information provided by Erika Pfeiffer of Pacific Engineering Technologies Inc., we understand that the proposed stormwater detention pond will be constructed west of the southwest corner of the planned Police Vehicle Storage Building as shown on the attached Site Plan for Percolation Tests. The detention pond will be about 50 feet long by 27 feet wide and about four feet deep. On August 16, 2000, Bergquist Engineering Services, with assistance from City of Renton personnel and equipment, performed three percolation tests in the vicinity of the proplIo sed detention pond as shown on the attached Site Plan for Percolation Tests. Three, fo ir-foot-deep test pits were excavated with a backhoe and the percolation tests were performed in the bottom of each of the test pits. 1 I I i GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION I I Percolation Testing of Nec ___arface Soils • City of Renton Proposed!Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility BES Project Number: 20031 , Report 1 Thle materials excavated from each test pit were visually classified to determine the subsurface soil conditions. One sieve analysis was performed in the laboratory on a representative sample of the native soils. The results of the test pits and laboratory testing are presented on the attached Test Pit Logs and Grain Size Distribution report. In generail, the surface of the site is covered with two to three feet of GRAVEL-SAND- SILT with occasional cobbles and debris consisting of wood, metal, and plastic. This layer is interpreted as fill. Underlying the fill, native soils were encountered. The native soils, according to the Unified Soil Classification System, classify as brown, medium dense, GRAVEL-SAND to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT (GW-GM) with cobbles some boulders. According to the U.S.D.A Textural Classification System, these soils classify as brown sand, Three percolation tests were performed at a depth of about six inches below the bottom of the test pits. Falling head percolation tests were performed using six-inch diameter.PVC pipe set into the hole. The pipe was carefully filled at least twice with water to soak the soils. Two to three tests per location were performed to determine the repeatable percolation rate. The results of these percolation tests are summarized in the following table. The three test pits were backfilled with the excavated soil upon completion of the tests. SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TEST DATA TEST NUMBER P1 . P2 = P3,` AVERAGE PERCOLATION 6.25 min./inch 1 .48 min./inch 4.65 min./inch RATE The average percolation rate of the site soils as determined by these tests is 4.1 minutes per inch. Using a factor of safety of two, an infiltration rate of 8.2 minutes per inch may be used in design of this detention pond. Detention ponds require periodic maintenance to retain the shape, volume, and infiltration characteristics used in design. Therefore, a maintenance program should be developed and followed. The program should include annual inspection of the floor and slopes by a representative of the owner to determine whether the floor is becoming Page 2 of 3 . Percolation Testing of Nec irface Soils City of Renton Proposed Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility BES Project Number: 20031 , Report 1 clogged with silt or clay sediments or vegetation and to determine whether the slopes are retaining their shape. The owner must realize that, periodically sediments and vegetation will need to be removed from the floor of the detention pond. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please contact me. Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering Services 4,7 4 2147/..._e_e44/ , • 4j • Richard A. Bergquist, PE 44a Principal 1 Attachments: Al Site Plan A2 Log of Test Pits A4 Unified Soil Classification System A5 Grain Size Distribution Report Distribution Addressee (5) Page 3 of 3 1 q Existing Chainlink Fence --* 0 u Fs t. I om �,v •Vy Ip/ ,/ " � r, - j " P 5ed Dnve U ',.V r x .: ropo way tom gip,- ,�•�:�- ,: (I, ' Tr 4` P1 @ $' ;;, I. P21ED Y= P31ED Proposed Driveway i I blii----*- N i Approximate Scale:1"=60' • I ® Percolation Test Number &Approximate Location I SITE FLAN FOR PERCOLATION TESTS Project Naime: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage For: City of Renton Facility 1, Bergquist Engineering Services Location: Renton,WA DES Project Number:20031-1 Date: August.2000 _ 1 Al • • Log of Test Mt P1 Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Kenton,WA Excavated By: City of Kenton BES Project No.: 20031 1 Logged By: K. A. Dergctuist, P.E. Date Excavated:August 10,2000 '`•Y3„'`'S7^aeC �n .�• u,;ca'��9' A%r: •'}�4g%' "i:�'n'4`a.�';','3�'ia'}„">.i.'i f ,J '•r�`:`�'„'�,�`"::( JCS'.-., yar x. 1,rc�3,. .'1;,:�:��r`c�N�"o�'a;���"cti::; `: .s {;;.: .� . )c3'� ::�a;• �. � �'�r� � .1.4;f' .1 �.':�•.ni•p.. ry ' .!5. Y'.: -n{ .;I:$n '✓i=',I';t''"' h':',�' 3�.�' i�. :2'y^�..;C'?;�Y;,�,``"-,k.•'x;r"st. fY'i�'vz-'t9"�,'L'f.•.::'��:::„7�.�� - e:'estl; .+ aJ,Jr:.:.?,,ti 3e �i�'..s e)„•>i rr..�'711� k f.,F.,. it C..l•" 7' C tio••i.�ir a.� �, d':' t Ifi :, 66G.Ci Rtl':.a . ,:�Er rya� G; p ^fir�y� Ia tl s �. ram$ r rI >, >a r t ftl , " �' ..�:. ,.. •�£ 4K,Nr,'i.,:�;rr� K.t` 1 —1— Brown, GRAVEL-SAND, occasional cobble, and debris 2 (FILL) _2— B51 GW-GM Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND 4 to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble _44 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. _5_ —5— Log of Test Pit P2 Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Renton,WA Excavated By.City of Renton DE5 Project,No.:20031-1 Logged By. K.A. Bergcluist,P.E. Date Excavated:August 16,2000 ,t'w• 1 5 •ti ,c g •f R 't e i ,,,'s,:ersa.'�y a:`' `vF" tit;1S ' 3K" 5, • � ,`'ii'p. r C ?: r • � t,C cf *� _ .' t'S'Sr•L`k47iy x�a� _ : ash 4. �.. ti" 'r�`afy,S:„.:,e,r+'y`: 6$rp_K'*�j{. ,�� ._ 9 F 4r Vs F•��*^'7s.4JsFy1 ��I�k eKk''� ..c�'A�y9.•t • Fk� K2 �•.6 �T'1 .tS� �Y i1 a. 1 s F.� •4!` -f`i ^�t�•'•YYrS� fdy fib` g _L ' � r :Nee r-' �` .7 . ti� + 2,'.;Y f.t i �:�;d •'F§, ;��r. �r� �rr � h i ,,t 5 )p h "� t'�"i�T ,' { F r•J ,>• tl x ee ,4't % &c f A t [r ��}11: t1 'tC.1a66 icatiOt1-. ;�/;er y, s/�i •Q K? �?".,i,'k`•'�5 Y.'l.. r" gt4....r4'y,wryq a:k�K {+.'v., �i,,yy,e ti 1n'•!fl`C �y Y�'. rGin.. ..d<.- .� ��, '> p,-•Xrsi,:5.. ^. • ... .. - —1— Brown, GRAVEL-SAND _1— 2 occasional cobble,trace debris (FILL) _2• _3_ —3— GW-GM Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND 4 to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble 4_ End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. 5 —5— 6 —6— A2 Log of Test Mt P3 Project: Detention Pond for Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Location: Renton,WA Excavated By: City of Renton DE5 Project No.: 20031-1 Logged By: R. A. Dergctuist, P.E. Date Excavated: August 16,2000 u U :c n '. o... `,I�escri'`' 'on and 6 fi rr _1_ Brown, GRAVEL-SAND, occasional cobble,trace 1_ debris (FILL) 2 2_ _3_ GW-GM Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT, occasional cobble _4_ 4 End of Test Pit. Dry at Completion. _5_ _5_ A3 UNIFIED 50IL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (U5C5) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the#200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, GW less than 5%fines. Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, GP less than 5%fines. GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger GM Silty GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures,more than No.4 sieve. than 12%fines. Clayey GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures, GC more than 12%fines. 5W Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly 5AND5 mixtures, less than 5%fines. Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, SP less than 5%fines. SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND-SILT mixtures,more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller SM fines. than No.4 sieve. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures,more than 12% fines Note:Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS • (More than 50%fines. Fines are materials passing the#200 sieve) GROUP;SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS,very fine SANDS,ROCK FLOUR,Silty or Clayey SANDS Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity,Gravelly SILTS and CLAYS CL CLAYS,Sandy CLAYS,Silty CLAYS,Lean CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 OL Organic SILTS,or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH • Inorganic SILTS,Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS,Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity,fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH - Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PEAT,MUCK,and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note:Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the"A"Line and have a plasticity index(PI)of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services A4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION - . . SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ' SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S.STANDARD I GRAIN SIZE IN MM V.I 7 Cs.I Co ..cr tv) N .4 ri- r- Al.,.. % it. .. " co.- 100 0 - ------ -- . ..—......- , __ --- - - - ".---— 90 .. ............................. ... .. ... 10............. .... • .....•••• •••••• •••• •- • ••••• ' " • - "*- " .... ...... . •••• ••• - ••••• -••• •• •••• ••••• • .. .... ... .. .. ..... ......... .. ............ .... • • ••- • " • • •"•• - " — ' • BO 20 .. . .. .. - .. •••••: M - • •-----•••• 13 13 •- . - • _............ M .... ..... .. ... .. . .. ... ••••• -1_ . . xi 70 . , 30 0 0 •••• ....... .... . • --- M •••• - M •-••-• .. ...,... .... - ' .. ......... • Z - • .....• ....... -I so • . 40 0 -rt • • . .............. 0 • --••••-• > Z • •••••••••••• 33 M33 ........ ..... - " "- • • . •• 50 --.••• • • -- 50 m w - ••• .. ..' . ''' •- ••-,•.....-..-........ •-.. ..•. -< . 3o3 03 .._. ... - iso -< ,-..‘),-; m .. .... ... ... .... ,...... a .6....) — •• ‘- .............. m i . .. . • 0 .. .. • -1 30 . . 1 i 70 . • ••• • •••-•••• •••• • •• -• - - ••• .. ...... ........ ... . .........• .............. --- •••• ••• - ••• .. .............. . . 4, ••••••-••• .............. ... .... ... . .. .... . ... •• ••• •••• . ............. '• 20 . 80 1 .... .• ,••• ...... - ..... - • ._............ •••• . .... ...... .. . . . •••••••• •-• - ............ • -'"'"' • - ......._...... 10 . , - 3 90 ..._... • .. --- ..-......... .......... •• - ._... .... - -•-••••••• ._............ .. .. - .......... ._............ o ,.,' T 1 -ITT t-1, t'" I .....- • '---- 100 ', § p, 8.2 8 ? 8 co N 0 CO tO '4 Cc) N v- l''CC: CR ".. el' c‘l .Ti• § § .§ § g GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS .q .4 a COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I - FINE FINES COBBLES GRAVEL SAND ' . • • • • ' • . • .. - • Moisture KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS : . • •DESCRIPTION . • . Content(%) LL PI • • . - • or----0 - P1 4' GW- Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND GM to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT • ,.. ; .. . . . • • ' H., GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED VEHICLE EVIDENCE , STORAGE FACILITY ij 3555 NE 2ND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON PREPARED FOR CITY OF RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON --.i BY BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 20028 . , REPORT NUMBER: 1 . , 1 ; OE•fr , gt°P,14 71'Ofijin-Fti ilit(4N/410 .1 _ . i ItCeniz.8;s ..., ''''.'.0- -,..,0,. 17- ' 11010,11.1401 : .,,,,..., .102:.„.! Bergq ' i ' t Engineering ,--terViees er -Is En ineerin w ervi es 32240 8th Avenue.SW ` RO. Box 25804 Federal Way,Washington 98023 Federal Way,Washington 98093 Phone: 253.661 .7658, Fax: 253.661 .1399, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com July 28, 2000 Lesley Wiscomb Community Services City of Renton • Renton City Hall - 5' Floor • 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 • Re: Subsurface Exploration • Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility • 3555 NE 2"d Street Renton,Washington BES Project Number: 20028, Report 1 • Dear Lesley: • This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed flood control wall to be constructed at City of Renton property at 3555 NE 2"d Street .in Renton, Washingtdn. The geotechnical exploration was performed to provide subsurface information and geotechnical engineering recommendations in accordance with BES Proposal Number • 13000 dated July 11, 2000. • The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, and presents our recommendations regarding foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. The appendix of the report presents site maps, boring logs, and explanatory aids Based on our exploration and engineering analysis, the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility may be supported on conventional spread-footings using an allowable GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility IitS I'rolect Number: ZUUZb Renton, Washington July 28, 2000 bearing capacity of up to 3,500 psf for design of the footings. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below finished grade in native, undisturbed, medium dense to dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) soils. Specific recommendations relative to design and construction of this project are presented in the attached report. The subsurface conditions and recommendations presented should be verified during construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Renton. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. Sincerely, B Bergquist Engineering Services waslit ��Cs` 4.4 'ke t `•, m yl.c 'Y. t r 1i V,. `,•r aosv I WIRES Richard A. Bergquist, PE Principal Copies to: Lesley Wiscomb (5) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION 3 4.1 Surface 3 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater 3 5. DISCUiiSSION 4 .. ._.. .. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 4 6.1 Seismic Considerations 4 6.2 Foundations 5 6.3 Slabs-on-Grade 6 6.4 Earthwork 6 6.4.1 Site Clearing 6 6.4.2 Excavation 6 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation 7 6.4.4 Slab-on Grade Preparation 7 6.4.5 Drainage 7 6.4.6 Materials. 7 6.4.7 Placement and Compaction 8 6.5 Surface Drainage 9 6.6 Groundwater 9 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing 10 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS 10 APPENDIX Vicinity Map Al Site Plan A2 Boring Log A3 Boring Log Notes A6 Unified Soil,Classification System A8 Schematic of Footing Drain A9 Notes Al GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED VEHICLE EVIDENCE STORAGE FACILITY 3555 NE 2ND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON prepared for CITY OF RENTON by BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 20028 JULY 28, 2000 • 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility to be constructed on City of Renton property located at 3555 NE 2' Street in Renton, Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map on page Al in the Appendix of this report. The geotechnical exploration was performed by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) to provide information or recommendations regarding: • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, • • allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with estimated settlements, • lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, • influence of groundwater on the development, • site preparation, and • excavation slope considerations. Ms. Lesley Wiscomb authorized our work by signing and returning a copy of BES's Proposal Number 13000, dated July 11, 2000. Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storag(- _ vilify July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 • '2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Based on information provided by Lesley Wiscomb, we understand that the proposed development will involve construction of a high-bay, single-story, slab-on-grade, pre- engineered metal building that will be about 110 feet long by about 95 feet wide. The • ground surface around the east, south and west sides of the proposed building will be used as driveways and parking. The building will be constructed on a site that is currently used as a material storage yard by the City of Renton. The finished floor elevation of the proposed building will be at or near the current ground surface elevation of the site. Actual live and dead loads that will be transmitted to the foundation were not available when this report was prepared, therefore, to evaluate alternative foundation systems and estimate settlements, we have assumed maximum column loads of 75 kips and maximum continuous wall loads of 3 kips per lineal foot. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a review of geologic literature, and drilling and sampling three borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan on page A2 in the Appendix of this report. Samples were taken at the intervals noted on the individual boring logs, which are presented in the Appendix oIn pages A3 through A5. The geotechnical engineer logged the borings and obtained bulk and standard split-spoon samples for analysis in the laboratory. Upon. completion the borings were plugged with bentonite chips and backfilled with site-soils. Laboratory analysis included visual classification of the soils sampled. The field and Y laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made]in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical-engineering practices in the area. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence age Facility July 28,2000 • Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. 4.1 Surface At the time of this exploration, the surface of the site sloped from a high elevation of about 109 feet above mean sea level in the northeast corner of the site to a low elevation of about 105 feet above mean sea level in the southwest corner of the proposed building site. Surface drainage appears to be in the form of sheet-flow towards the southwest. The ground surface to the north of the proposed site is paved with asphaltic concrete and used for storage of electrical traffic-control equipment. An asphalt concrete paved road runs along the east side of the site and generally follows the grade of the proposed site. A gravel road runs on a slight skew towards the west south west near the south edge of the proposed site. This road grades down towards the south-west so that it is two to three feet below the proposed site. The ground surface along the west side of the proposed site is covered with weeds and nearly follows the grade of the proposed site. 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the boring logs in the Appendix of this report. The stratification lines indicated on the boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. The surface of the site is covered with about one-foot of brown GRAVEL-SAND (GP), which may be fill. Underlying the surface fill, and extending the full depth of the exploration, brown, loose'to dense, GRAVEL-SAND (GP) with occasional cobbles was encountered. In general, these soils exhibited "N-values" ranging from 13 to 36 blows per foot except for a two-foot- Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage July 28, 2000 Renton,Washiington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 thick layer of brown, loose GRAVEL-SAND (GP) that was encountered from a depth of four and one-half feet to six and one half feet (41 to 61') in Borings 1 and 2. Based on visual classification and estimated grain-size distribution it is estimated that the site soils are highly permeable and minimally erodible. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings at completion. Groundwater readings in granular soils, such as those encountered at this site, are generally accurate even after short periods of observation. Whereas, the groundwater level in fine-grained (silt and clay) soils, may require several days of observation before it becomes stable and accurate. 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratoryiborings. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation'loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the borings, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS . I The following sections present recommendations regarding seismic considerations, foundations, lateral earth pressures, and for earthwork, excavations, drainage, and groundwater. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the project site; is in Seismic Zone 3. According to Table 16-J of the UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by a Soil Profile Type Sc. The soils at this site are not susceptible to liquefaction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence ige Facility July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 6.2 Foundations If the earthwork recommendations presented later in this report are followed, the proposed Vehicle Storage Facility may be founded in the native, undisturbed, brown, loose to medium dense or dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) soils encountered at a depth of about two (2) feet below the existing ground surface. If the foundations are placed in these undisturbed native soils a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 3,500 psf may be used to dimension individual column and continuous wall footings. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by one-third for short-term loads caused by seismic events and wind. Lightly loaded, interior partition walls may be supported on thickened floor slab sections provided that: (1) loads do not exceed 750 pounds per lineal foot, (2) thickened sections are at least 12 inches wide, and (3) section thickness and reinforcement are consistent with structural requirements. The recommended minimum dimension for individual column footings is 30 inches and the recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 24 inches. All exterior footings and footings in unheated spaces should be placed at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total settlement of the foundation will be less than one (1") inch and differential settlement between adjacent footings should be less than three-quarters (3/41 of an inch. Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations or low retaining walls with level backfill and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below: Active: Undisturbed subsoils 40 psf/ft. Compacted granular soils 45 psf/ft. Passive: Continuous footings 350 psf/ft. An ultimate coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.45 may be used to resist lateral foundation loads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral loads, reduce the ultimate coefficient of friction to 0.35. A factor of Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 10 • i• Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage ,_._'lily July 28,2000 Renton,Washington • BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 safety of 1 .5 should be applied',to these values. A moist unit-weight of soil equal to 130 pounds per cubic foot should be used in design. Footings and stem walls should be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer should determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. All footing excavations at this site should be inspected by the geotechnicall engineer prior to placement of reinforcement steel. 6.3 Slabs-on-Grade Slabs-on-grade should be supported on a minimum four-inch-thick, suitable, free-draining, sand or gravel base that follows gradation and compaction recommendations provided in this report. ,A vapor barrier should be included beneath the slab to minimize. transmission of moisture through the concrete floor. Dowels and keyways should be evaluated for use at control joints where load transfer capability is required All concretes, especially slabs-on-grade, should be placed at minimum water-cement ratios on moistened surfaces and -properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before placing vinyl or other moisture sensitive surface treatments. 6.4 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.4.1 Site Clearing: Any existing vegetation, loose gravel fill, and any other deleterious materials should be removed from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing and stripping, the exposed surfaces should be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage during construction. 6.4.2 Excavation: Conventional-excavating equipment should be suitable for the proposed foundation,excavations; however, due to the relative density and presence of coarse gravels and cobbles in the subsurface soils, reduced production rates should be anticipated. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence age Facility July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 According to Chapter 296-155,\Part.N of the Safety Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C soils. Therefore, side slopes of excavations deeper than four (4) feet should be no steeper than one and one-half (11h) horizontal to one (1) vertical (11H:1 V). If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 11H:1 V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer should _ be contacted for additional recommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation: The need for specialized treatment of the foundation soils is not anticipated at this site. Care, however, must be exercised during excavation of the ' footings so as not to disturb the bearing surface. If the bearing surface is disturbed or if loose soils are encountered at the foundation depth, the soil should be moisture conditioned and compacted in accordance with the requirements presented in Paragraph 6.4.7 of this report. If loose soils are encountered to a significant depth below the foundation level, the . geotechnical engineer should be contacted immediately. 6.4.4 Slab-on Grade Preparation: The need for specialized treatment of the subgrade soils is not anticipated at this site. Care, however, must be exercised during excavation and grading of the subgrade soils so as not to disturb them. If the subgrade soils are disturbed or if loose soils are encountered, they must be moisture conditioned and compacted in accordance with the requirements presented in Paragraph 6.4.7 of this report.. 6.4.5 . Drainage: Good drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth- supported structures such as foundations, slabs-on-grade, and retaining walls. Accordingly, we recommend that a perimeter footing drain-system consisting of a perforated pipe surrounded by pea gravel be installed. The pea gravel should be separated from the surrounding soil by a filter fabric. The collected water should be tight-lined away from the building to a suitable discharge system. Roof and surface drains should be provided but they should not be connected to the footing-drain system. 6.4.6 Materials: In general, it appears that the native site soils are suitable for use as backfill and structural backfill on this site. Because of the presence of cobbles, screening of the native soils to remove the oversize material may be required. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 10 i• Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage'racility July 28,2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 If additional material is required to meet site grade, it should be imported, conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.1 , and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Samples must be submitted to the geotechnical engineer at 'least 72 hours before approval is required and before the materials are used. TABLE 6.1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL FILL y` "':�^':* ., �' lke ,�+ &hz-' aa. '3:p`' »t p ::fY� '�G'r amMincIa 4 �Ne.Y1"yam ' erce clO 3-inch 100 3/4-inch 50-100 No. 4 25-65 No. 10 10-50 No. 40 0-20 No. 200 0-5* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket may be required. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation presented in;Table 6.2, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. TABLE 6.2 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK BLANKET 4-inch 100 No. 200 5 maximum* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 6.4.7 Placement and Compaction: With the exception of structural backfill behind any retaining walls, all fill and backfill materials (structural, select, and gravel base) should be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding 10 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density as determined by the modified Proctor test,(ASTM 1557). The soils should be compacted at moisture contents within three (3) percent of optimum moisture. Placement of frozen soils or placement of soils on frozen ground should not be attempted. Bergquist Engilneering Services Page 8 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidenc_ _:rage Facility July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 . Structural backfill behind retaining walls should meet the gradation recommendations presented in Table 6.1 and should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by the modified Proctor (ASTM 1557) at moisture contents within two percent of optimum. The specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift should be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground should not be attempted. Unless these walls are designed to withstand the additional lateral loads, heavy equipment should not be operated behind the walls within a distance from the wall equal to the height of the wall. Lightweight equipment should be used to deliver backfill soil behind the wall and hand operated equipment should be used for compaction. If fill slopes are required, the fill should be overbuilt (placed and compacted well beyond the proposed slope) and the desired slope should then be cut into the compacted fill. Fill slopes may be required along the south end of the proposed site. 6.5 Surface Drainage Good surface drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth-supported structures such as foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades should be designed to prevent water from entering the foundations or gravel drains behind any retaining walls or from ponding on or next to pavements. Where pavement does not immediately abut structures, slopes, with an outfall of at least three (3) percent for a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from exterior footings, should be provided. These slopes should be capped with relatively impervious soils to prevent infiltration of water into the foundation soils. 6.6 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings performed for this project. Therefore, groundwater should not present problems during construction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 10 Proposed Vehicle Evidence StoragE ility July 28, 2000 Renton,Washington BES Project Number 20028-Report 1 I . 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified representative. At a minimum, the testing program should include: • Observation and review of site clearing and review of all foundation excavations to • evaluate whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during i exploration. • Observation and testing of placement and compaction of all fill and backfill materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. • Field inspection and laboratory testing of materials and field inspection of methods as required by the appropriate Uniform Building Code. Typically, this includes ;nspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and testing of portland cement concrete to evaluate compliance with specifications regarding slump, temperature, air content, and strength. . i 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are for the exclusive use of the City of Renton for the proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility to be constructed at the City of Renton Shops property located at 3555 NE 2"d Street in Renton, Washington. The recommendations are based on the available subsurface information obtained by Bergquist Engineering Services, and on design details for the project provided by Lesley Wiscomb of the City of Renton. If there are any revisions to the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, BES should be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the foundation recommendations are required. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations have been,interpreted properly. 000 Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 10 j . 1• , _. _ n.. .1 .. SI • '1 .I,C iiii. .4 ,,X...'. .„, ic 1 -Th 'd. 1TTH El , .: s _ I NE11• I 1". '''''' ''l '> :' ii Inv I 4 '4.0 ,. 4'40 •o N[ it cL. M: • ,',_31 OLIVERM SE n7fNAZEN D it — .i. ,•.' „ `,�N[ not e ' .lti ' ' 1 ,1 N i \ E '. HE TOM ' .7 •• ''''t -• ..1 7., ..R :�„[ .' �� i SE runt < r.4 torN .- E t I I,: — 1" - MS; tiri ; . .. - I 'SEE, —K-1,-)Aqh• . .js , ,i i CT h 11til� % i N[ 2T .-.U._ 1. ST .... IV 7 dT rJ(� �3 N[ g �, `>�-E 121ST S7 '1 ��4p, lir N mil s I..if... ,R two 5T r 1 trin.,,..Lii ' '� L 1t, AVM i$ 1i. :BElffiTNJT ' ' -4?1,), . ; : .-: . .- 48 .... R NI Jlei. ...,..4 . . ...el ::1114Z L- -—_— --N!__ __f SE iz�Tx Al ./ nowt MCLS P. 1 --- - 'l' �I SE I I25TN ST . l4axl- :: OREENpO .-,� I la W./1 @ 1 LtFA/N111- ` 1 .41 P::tit)' i e ct I NE 1ST ' itilligi is lti.-14. eaARIVER m Itt'1 ta ►t CEDARe N. 1 ,+'' + <`A SE it•TM<ST _fin. a 1t l>1 < . �'� - - .4,tysE. 1N ST a : ): y'`- ) , ,i L!rj. :g . 3 to y" �0 _ I r _ ; ST ua le MOLLM .u3, •'.•:�1W1RSE444 xi, - :::'.i ' '.1 R 8 Xi it..�1w11Kr ,r " I Q `. a "•r•" 4 �O WA 1 VICINITY MAP Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For:City of Renton Location:Renton,WA Services i3ES Project Number.20028 Data:July,2000 • Al I ! � Existing Fence Chainlink Fence Proposed Driveway s M1 ; 41 ems. I m fZA „ Z 0 II m Proposed Driveway 1/1" II Approx mate Scale:1"=60' Boring Number&Approximate Location SITE PLAN Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For.City of Renton Location: Renton,WA Services DES Project Number.20028 Pate:July,12000 A2 ?rgquist Engineering Ser __ �s Log of Boring 1 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence\.Storage Facility Drill Rig: CME 85 Location: Renton,WA Boring Size: 8"/HSA DES Project No.:20028, RPT.1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled:July 25, 2000 Logged By: R. A. Bergcquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:106' �y f A N y,.Dc .�r on ( 5G3 v :r3 :: ` �'.�.Vl'J[171,7e , IQ 3 ;;' h -m, ., ""f- _. '': J $ ; y�r las Lea. . e f gtvType ., �` .�._,..Foot) e.. s+'y'. $ ,�.'ea" .. K.,....U- 'ice...tr �,- 1AU -- -- - Brown GRAVEL-SANDLGPD(fossible Fill). Brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP) 255 19 -- ''1 5_ _ - �_ 355 8 -- Brown.loose GRAVEL-SAND(GP) _ 455 23 -- 10 _10 _ 555 13 -- — brown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP) _ 15 _15_ — — 655 26 -- — End of boring. Dry at completion. 2O 20 25 _25_ 30 _30 _35_ _35_ A3 Bei luist Engineering Service , Log of oring 2 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence\Storage Facility Drill gig: CME 85 Location: Renton,WA boring Size:8"/HSA DES Project No.:20028, RPT.1 Drilled Dy: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled:July 25, 2000 Logged Eiy: R. A. Dergoluist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:107 tigaSampkr iVO ,W":Water NO414 _..trf,SM"-SITATf keVrft.T nrio= .12101 - Number,„ 410,ea, E- 4%-vifte ounpOW, ' s*Ei; y =r4 V -Ae .1AU _ brown GRAVEL-SANDI...Gt.) (Poesible Full 255 25 Drown, medium dense GRAVEL-SAND (GP) _5_ -5- 355 9 Brown,loose GRAVEL-SAND(GP) • 455 31 _10_ • 10_ 555 21 Brown,medium dense to dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP),occasional cobble _15_ _15_ 655 25 • En cl of boring. Dry at completion. _20_ ' _20_ • •; _25_ _25_ _30_ _30_ _35_ _35_ A4 •ergquist Engineering Series Log of boring 3 Project: Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Drill Rig: CME 85 Location: Renton,WA Boring Size: 8"/HSA DES Project No.:20028, RFT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: July 25, 2000 Logged By: R. A. Bergctuist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation:109' 4 Egr4-7 E17:41EN: -4- Pescriptio Number 6-41 FiContent Wk4.- vc-a tAs UM: Yke . —gegitiga 1AU Brown GRAVEL-SANIUGF_UPossible Full 255 31 _5_ 355 27 455 25 Drown,medium dense to dense GRAVEL-SAND(GP)occasional cobble JO_ _10_ 555 36 J5 _15_ 655 21 End of boring. Dry at completion. _20_ _20_ _25_ _25_ _30_ 30_ _35_ A5 BORING LOG NOTES These notes and boring logs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The boring logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the boring on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the boring logs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. The borings were located in the field by measuring from existing site features. "Boring Size/Type" refers the diameter and type of auger used. "HSA" denotes hollow-stem auger. "SSA" denotes solid-stem auger. "BA" denotes bucket auger. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "AU" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the auger flights. • "SS" indicates split-spoon sampler with 1-3/8" inside diameter and 2" outside diameter. • "DM" indicates Dames and Moore split-spoon sampler with 2-1/2" inside diameter and 3-1/3" outside diameter. "Blows/Foot (N-Value)" refers to the number of blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches required to advance a standard sampler one-foot or a specified distance. Refusal is 50 blows for less than six inches or 25 blows without advancing the sampler. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the boring. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the boring logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. .,.7 " Indicates location of groundwater at the time noted. A6 BORING LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON-COHESIVE SOIL Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows/foot TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Strength Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot (tsf) Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1 .00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2.00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8-inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches • • Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm • Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand • 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074mm to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm A7 • UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) • COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the#200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. GP Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. GRAVELS Silty GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures,more More than half of coarse fraction is larger GM _ than No.4 sieve. than 12%fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS.GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures, more than 12%fines. SW Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. SP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SAND5 mixtures, less than 5%fines. SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND-SILT mixtures,more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller SM fines. than No.4 sieve. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures,more than 12% fines Note:Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50%fines. Fines are materials passing the#200 sieve) GROUP;SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS,very fine SANDS,ROCK FLOUR,Silty or Clayey SANDS CL Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity,Gravelly SILTS and CLAYS • CLAYS,Sandy CLAYS,Silty CLAYS.Lean CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 • OL Organic SILTS,or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS,Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS,Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity.fat CLAYS Liciuid limit greater than 50 OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity P( PEAT,MUCK,and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note:Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the"A"Line and have a plasticity index(PI)of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services AS ra° j Interior Sabi-on-Grade Evertor G \ \ \\ \ • Tightline roof drain O re Footing 9 : 4 4"diameter, hard, perforated pipe. Slope to drain Minimum 6"of pea or washed gravel Nonwoven filter fabric SCHEMATIC OF FOOTING DRAIN Project Name:Proposed Vehicle Evidence Storage Facility Bergquist Engineering For.City of Renton Location:Renton,WA Services DES Project Number:20028 Date:July,2000 A9 • li NOTES • • 1 II 4 A1D CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Pre-Application Comments n DATE: June 8, 2000 <i�r 4,© R�ti TO: Lesley Wiscomb, Capital Project Coordinator ® `P49 Tti��NG FROM: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner,x7219 �®k� SUBJECT: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility,Pre-Application File#00-59 General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained,in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers(e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board • of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant his encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$50,plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The project would construct a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on City owned property directly south of the City of Renton Public Works Shops. The proposed 12-14,000-sf metal building is expected to store approximately 30-35 vehicles • impounded by the Renton Police Department In addition to the main storage area, a small office for;processing paperwork,a separate fenced area for secure short-term evidence_ processing,overhead bicycle storage and a small hazardous materials storage area will be provided;,Access will be limited to Renton Police and authorized personnel. No restroom facilities or heat are anticipated within the structure. - Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Institution on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned Light Industrial(P). The site is also located within the Aquifer Protection Zone 2._The IL zone allows the warehousing and storage as a primary permitted use. The "P"suffix condition relates to notice to adjacent property owners if there is: 1) Change of Use, 2) Change of Tenant, or 3) Change of Ownership. The"P"suffix condition does not apply in this instance because the property is owned by the City of Renton, currently utilized for storage and the use will remain the same although the storage will now be enclosed within a building. Pre-App 00-59.doc\ Development Standards: The IL development standards restrict building height to 50' and lot coverage 65% of the site. The IL zone requires a 15-foot setback from street property lines and 20' setbacks on rear or side yards-which the proposal appears to satisfy. Landscaping—A 15' wide landscaped visual barrier is required from abutting residential zones. Tlie site appears to satisfy this requirement due to the vegetated buffer along the site perimeter that screens the project from the adjacent residential uses. The formal application submittal would need to include a description of vegetated buffer to assure compliance. Screening Outdoor storage areas,if any,must be screened from adjacent or abutting properties'with a fence, landscaping, landscaped berm, or combination thereof. All surface- mounted utility or mechanical equipment and rooftop equipment must be screened from public view. Screening(a minimum of 6 feet in height)must also be provided for all garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas pursuant to RMC section 4-4-09007. Dumpsters are not permitted within required setback areas, as well as within 50 feet of a residentially zoned property. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. Parking—Based on the information provided, and the fact that there is no commercial use of the storage,area, it appears that the use qualifies as"dead storage"which does not require additional parking spaces. However,it would benefit the project to provide parking for the maximum number of personnel processing the evidence. Permit Requirements: The project would require Environmental(SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval._Both permits would be reviewed concurrently in an estimate fi*rp me of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The - applicationi fee would be$1,500,plus$.33 perm g a e regwre or note cation to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. Please refer to the attached list of submittal requirements for detailed information regarding the formal land use application. In addition Ito the required land use permits, separate construction,building permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre-App 00-59.doc1 City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Steven Taylor From: Kayren K.Kittrick ,19v Date: ;June 8,2000 Subject: 'Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PreApplication Review NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the-City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers(e.g.Hearing Examiner,Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line on the City of Renton Shop site. The derated fire flow;in the vicinity is modeled at 4778 gpm with a static pressure of 95 psi. Extension of the water line may be required to provide the building with fire and domestic service. 2. There are at least two fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 3. The proposed project is located in the 565 water pressure zone and in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 4. Hazardous materials being stored on site requires containment facilities for both the materials and any spillage from damaged vehicles. It is recommended that the floor be designed and constructed to allow no spill to leave the building by door or drain. 5.' An operating permit and facility inspections may be required depending on the quantity and variety of hayardous materials. 6. The Water System Development Charge(SDC)does not apply to city owned properties. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch diameter sewer on the shop site. Extension may be required if sanitary service is needed. 2. The Sanitary Sewer SDC is not applied to city held properties. SURFACE WATER 1. A level one drainage study is required. Retention/detention calculations are required for this project. Water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces subject to vehicular access is required. 2. The Surface Water SDC is not assessed on city held properties. • Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PreApplication Review 06/08/00 Page 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee-of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per the warehouse rate of 4.88 trips per 1000 square feet. 2. Improvements such as driveway/access paving, curb & gutter are required to meet any fire department emergency response minimums or drainage concerns. 3. All l wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. PLAN REVIEW 1. All,plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards which are attached for reference. Also attached for general information are a fee reference sheet and the King County Storm Water standards as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. A construction permit is required.When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report,a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. CC: Neil Watts CITY OF RENTON Community Services Department MEMORANDUM TO: Laureen Nicolay, Development Services FROM: Lesley Wiscomb, Capital Project Coordinator RE: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Project DATE: 09 May 2000 This is a request for a preliminary project review meeting to discuss requirements and regulations for the proposed Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility project Enclosed are plans and maps pertaining to the .proposed project in accordance with Pre- Application requirements. • PROJECT NAME: Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility PROJECT LOCATION: Renton Public Works Shops Site (see attached Legal Description and Aerial Photograph) PROJECT'DESCRIPTION: Project Overview The proposed project is the construction of a one-story police evidence vehicle storage facility on a City-owned parcel directly south of the City of Renton Public Works Shop site off NE 2nd Street The metal building is expected to be approximately 12,000 to 14,000 square feet and accessible to tow trucks and flat bed vehicles. The building and surrounding site improvements will occupy a project area of approximately 37,000 square feet, or an area approximately 170 feet by 215 feet This is about 17% of the total parcel. The parcel'is zoned "IL" for "Industrial — Light' and is classified as "Center Institution" on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and it is noted that Olympic pipelines (16"/20") are located across the southeast corner of the site but appear to be out of the proposed project area by a considerable distance. Current Use of Site The majority of the project area is currently fenced and used as a storage yard by Renton Public Works Department Project area outside the fence is generally grassed or graveled. The remainder of the site is wooded with cleared areas that provide access to the King County Shops located west of the Renton Shops. Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Pre-App Page 1 Proposed Use of the Site and Project Scope The proposed use of this site is for a metal building system facility to store evidence vehicles for the Renton Police Department. The Department currently rents space in a warehouse and stores some vehicles at the Renton Public Works Shops for this purpose. Scope of the work includes construction of the building and looped driveway to accommodate tow trucks and flat beds. It is anticipated that connections to adjacent existing utilities that serve the Renton Shops will be made as required. The Building The facilityiwill be used to store approximately 30-35 vehicles impounded by the Renton Police Department for use as evidence. Most of these vehicles have varying degrees of damage caused by accidents and must be transported to the facility. The building will be secured by an alarm system and not open to the public. Access will be limited to the Renton Police Department personnel Who process evidence and persons conducting related Police business. No restroom facilities or heat are anticipated within the structure. In addition to the main storage area, the following areas are proposed inside the facility: (1) a small office area for processing paperwork, (2) a separate fenced area for housing up to two vehicles during evidence processing, (3) an overhead storage area for bicycles, and (4) a contained area to store hazardous materials such as gas cans, LPG containers, etc. Within the facility, the vehicles may be moved around as necessary by dollies or an automotive tow cart. Issues&Questions for Consideration 1. Environmental Review any special issues? 2. We request waiver of parking analysis due to the nature of the facility. One or two spaces are proposed in order to accommodate police officers processing the evidence. 3. Will an extensive drainage report, including TIR be required? 4. What is'required to locate the facility in APA 2? 5. What will be required for fire protection in the building? The facility will be 12,000-14,000 square feet and should not require sprinklers due to adequate side yard separation. 6. We assume a Traffic Study will not be required for this project due to its nature. 7. What type of building ventilation will be required? 8. May we connect to existing utilities that serve the Shops facility? 9. What is the maximum quantity of hazardous materials allowable in our haz-mat room? Is storage of these materials in a fire-rated cabinet acceptable? Police Evidence Vehicle Storage Facility Pre-App Page 2 • Cp, Mq6.00A,041,y o cp ?000 44'0484840, MEMORANDUM F%Paz:T DATE: 5- -CO TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: f'diCe /lc 'c& "see aixoffe, /JGr/v LOCATION: 5 3.5 L PREAPP NO. d`D 5'7 Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Ple a submit your written comments to° {PA.P� T Lor no later than c l�� !( "" . Thank you. We will riot be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. Sr -7c IS 06314 IATeYJ c 7rre12_ 1)VS71 rune J 1►�1 TI4 .COrAP1262.# r (JL./ri/ /jrpo Ze)wi. O 1 L.60, NO pollw (55v - roR- S-G T[ lL PZ_47M-14VC.� Popp ON 2000 /S/ON MEMORANDUM DATE: - C TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: febee, Pal/aeze re/de J . x. (C/lf�� LOCATION: J. of 5552 ►i'.' befAi ot_ Ste PREAPP NO. tb - 5q 1 A meeting wj h the applicant has been scheduled for •Wl Art ,Thursday, , in one of the 6°floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to cf CAl•Pni. T (CY at least two (2)days before the meeting. Thank you. a; s ('e c.iiry Quid oil Seta ar �/oor olr � Ior Vein 41" 4i2) N e-U+er2 r 1 ar- tA� ara eS in c 120 a J 2 . 7 1 S 1 , Per S, er Co - ar—'- . or ('-( 000 c•{'w.. r Preapp2 • ' '1�IV`n' E1 U 1. 11:01 RENT: MEMORANDI I FIRE DE FPRTMENT DATE: q— v TO: . Construction Services, Fire Prey n, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: f ViCPi (�I&1'7Ce treh,C(e J _0(e/i f LOCATION: J. or 52 ►�!' be() e-? l/ S PREAPP NO. 1rO J 5� A meeting with,the applicant has been scheduled for ji •�Art , Thursday, \/ ►✓ , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Y - •ays s e ore a mee ing. hank you. 11/ S . ,014imert/5 - • ;l /r5 Preapp2 , I ♦ A fi= ♦ CITY OF RENTON 4,-off FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE:II May 15, 2000 TO: Steven Taylor, Planner 9 FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Police Evidence Storage Facility, 3 52 NE 2nd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm monitoring system are required. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. The Hazardous Materials Storage room will be required to all building and fire code requirements to include secondary containment. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 5. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 6. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i v _ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7,2000 TO: Steve Taylor FROM: I Carolyn Boatsman SUBJECT: Renton Police Department Vehicle Impound Facility I have reviewed the pre-application package and have the following comments: The code does not prohibit such a facility in Zone 2 of the aquifer protection area. Covering the vehicles and placing them on a concrete floor provide considerable protection for the aquifer. The code',requires secondary containment of hazardous materials. I would recommend that this facility be constructed with a floor that serves as secondary containment for substances that may leak out of vehicles. The applicant could slope the floor towards the middle or construct a barrier around the perimeter of the floor. I would prefer that the facility not have floor drains that lead either to the sanitary or storm sewer. Floor drains imply that spills will be allowed to go down the drain. Spills should not be allowed to go down a drain but should be absorbed using any of the many products designed for that purpose. The floor can then be washed and the wastewater disposed of in a sink. However,if the Uniform Building Code requires a floor drain and oil/water separator, I suppose that would be OK given that spills in this case will be almost exclusively petroleum products which will be mostly removed by the oil/water separator. Code requirements for construction activity, wastewater, stormwater, and fill quality provide additionaliprotection of the aquifer. The facility may need to obtain an Aquifer Protection Area Operating Permit. The threshold is 20 gallons of hazardous materials on the premises. The permit is free and is granted on an annual basis after an inspection. The inspection is to verify that secondary containment requirements are met, that procedures are in place to respond to spills, that employees are trained, etc. It would also be required that the operator provide the Water Utility with an inventory of hazardous materials. ! Please contact me at x7211 should you have further questions. Thank you for bringing this project to my attention. cc: Abdoul Gafour C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\st0600xx.doc\st INTERFUND TRANSFER h Transfer Number: Date: 4'-/39/2)Z General Description: , Pv14-71, �n�;e- C.tam. , L tk f e r Department To Be Charged (Transfer Out-From) 6_)rrr:. Description Account Number WO/Function Amount ht-/4"Ffik s2 �E-Reiuiy 3/10.,tk, 0.70 .6,2,420 y 5/.e'er I /azze #/,S9/.• 0=' De artment Authorization: C ed-aC e ? At i , • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • APR 3 0 20 Department To ISESOWErrransfer In To) D°liaeloirre--14- Description Account Number WO/Function Amount Si le,pl ? vaa.3ti5. si .oD.CM? Soo;v 0Ce,t 7 11 r ) C,3`t5, 8l.49,0001 51110 5 POS-tior a 1 ox.o6":579.go. ,r, ! 5955 • Distribution: White: Finance Department Yellow: Department4o be Charged Pink: Department to be Credited _,_TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 04-30-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-052 Payment Made: 04/30/2002 04:38 PM Receipt Number: R0202391 Total Payment: 1,501.02 Payee: IOT Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage DEVELOPMENT pLgN 1.02 CITY OF RENTON ING Payments made for this receipt APR 3 o Trans Method Description RECEIVED Amount Payment Other 1,501.02 Account Balances Trans Account Code' Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review . .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008.Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD ,.00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519. 90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 i.OJ H� mu �r,rliw III,. 11 F G� Y I 715 c rc 25 I `� T.. rs, I II o7 a4 559.$1 W P I I Jr R tokl S PLAT S 1.61 �j� I I VRPF Cy � , II �a�a '�� V I I 22o .41 Q I I I SASSOC OUT O CARL O I I — (--..,,,.,_, rc ,24 _`O I - - 30' ant.rr [swrr E H 225 1 , + co v�.v4T�J , 1 ( I I SIIANLEY E. STONE sz 3e, 0.76AC. !/ 1 I 1.2• . Ac. �w a ii II - \;J r I I ~\ 3011 9 7163 ct P a r E I1 ss7.go 1P. L. NU N �. o O Q� I , N I I 3.13 A . �51 I it + 327 52 ` ,P I I ALBE{ T BALGH �" SF V D si i I I 12.01 AG.' �v; ti 4j 1 I 642.5/ •T�:!9y u Ir.L.30 7 2 II I V I I 317.L 692.E +FRANCI J. CHANDLER N m4i b I I .03 Ac. ooi vacant o I Z I �� CITY OF RENTON �18 526.10 50 RAN t r_,1••• 4,42.59 T.[.•29 b32.6 N.E. 2ND ST.) - ------------- --- - t....--'W 1' / z3./9 S.E. _--_--So. ACCESS E , �. ^.:\•9 q ,o?� l I 1 --- I !meek, � 0.24 Ac. �c, ' : y01 1Y I u 4 r.�77� h f'° 1 L---- i I q1$ n —� I Q o I J I...— dr--EMI I O :,Qs l ��'� I 1 ; ;5 V I I `11.55 I I i t v I 84 co a • I ' t 0 I e. • 11 I • I KING JUN i Y C., L I i _ __t-,../ `• _ _.f._I FIRST INVESTMENT co. � Ni C I 1 II 0\\\ 1 I I I I \�, I I 1j 7L75 I I II r26 II I I I `I i I, �� � o •o I *„ R o 1 1 II I .,. I I ��., rt.SB Q II zo I I 11 -� 1 .. — TfII �I I , • I III - VO it I I; • L \, I ;� 1 \. 2.� rlir \�\ \\ n.6o I 200 \\ 186.5 I 40.29Ac. + 11i 28.93Ac. `0 N U r 31�6•$3 r2 3 I T.L.6o \\ ' 0.5 t 1 rr 0 7 -x-. .. it j 1 ,326.53 \� 11 L�ISutiE 11 • • 1r • 11 j=,T,4rl,j I1 II I046 \11 II \\ 1 II II \\\ I II • \\ 1 \`\ 11 \t - 11 1 I /�'i DEVELOPMENT p�NNING 1j 1 RENTON ,I 3 ...1 1 / o h i APR 02002 I I, I \N • . CO( RECEIVED I 11 I I I I 1111 II , KING COUNTY 40.15 AC, I „ JONN C. EDWARDS 40.ISAC. I Z " ,\ gL1" 20 �'ii POLIGE .EVI g'L CE . ^^ _d� -'10 , z I \\ E5 . 9T23N R5E E1/2 ri I , C S • _I _ . cs L(--,-)-I 1 ; . __ . . __. . 1 4th St. NE 4tti St. IC • CA i CS : 6 > NE 3rd Pl. R — 8 co R — 1 0 C S R10< P ) 0 , ! R -- 1 0 NE 2nd St. R10 . ...... ., , 1 , , R M H '''i I R — 8 ..%_. , k4, R-8 IL (P ) ', 5 .; tc\i'h'el,\/0 , _ ewe ..---------, , . . , up ..) . pri , .--- ' ' ' > c 0\ SJ 7 1 ,._, el o R- M W1-1 ?P.DI X siT�. •a �� N u) . R M H . , z R-8 S� z M Cr7 N Q cc 90 • 'cZ y i Al 1, wJ' f � R M H FZ- ! .. ..,,,,. . %—__.- .. .' R —I I I . ' // . .. ,, , , . . , ,. , , . , I / / , „..,. . ,/. ‹, ,,' . 7-„, R - 8 , ,, ,.,, , . , , .... . . 6-),(.. ,, ..sRC ( P ) . .. . . R-8 R - 8 e 4 C --- ' -,9' o R C ( P ) , ,,, \ ,.. , , , , \ , / , � ;, _ , \ ,, ,/ R ,8 %,, / , , '• �' yy 'F° 7 F i IEVELOPMENT PLANNING 'IVA( ! C <I L k�� _Li CITY OF RENTON R /8 ' . Aill APR 3.0 2002 G5 - 21 T23N R5E E 1/2 ...'y 15:ko cim /F5 ��� °4' ZONING 1°4800 � P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES _ 16 T23N R5E E 1/2 �N,�o rnns/rn ECF C „ -0 5� F L 1140;p . 9 E 1/2 _ i 4th St. N 4t St. c..c.. ..1--- - ' 1 - 1 , , , , ,' CA ' CA csH', 6 ..< 'R - 0 NE 3rd Pl. R - 1O 0 CSR - 1O< P ) 0 , 'R --._.10 , NE RiO 2nd St. . . , . _ • , RMH1 R - 8 ' R-8 IL (P ) . ,., I SE1al‘ el , `5 - - o ;R- I. Matti scrE. 1-3 RMH w R-8 LS-E . F Z VI NOmer dummy , E-+ cZ\O 0 - : ...••••• "". ` , ---."'" N 1 :4: , ... ..141., ,i., 'C _40-74, !- VW ...-- RMH ,\Z • _ , ' R - 8 ,, , ,'' / ,/ , .....,. . • / , , T , , , . ...., ... . , ,:6-)•e_ . . 1 . pLo,; ,,' . / �� . , RC ( P ) .// R-8 , -- R - 8,,, _ C r R— .zie --1 L, -- -.' -,c), r -___:„. Ty - :1: ,.„. ccAp„' R C ( P ) \ \ tkYN44:4.. , , y9- DEVELOPMENT FLA 1►�y / / i CITY OE REIN R/- 8 ' APR 3 0 22 2 RECEIVED . . ._. — ,,.., E.)(,, . tiVY o G5 - 21 T23N R5E E 1/2 0 G„ ZONINGFVLDEt4CE1=4�800 4" F5 P/H✓PW TECHNICAL SERVICES ��Nzo� � u(L-bI N� 16 T23N R5E E 1/2 A_ 2z. _l17