The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA02-054 Vol. 1 of 2 C.uA- 62—of Return Address: 011001101100 00001 0 I 0 City Clerk's Office City of Renton 20040503000011 CITY OF RENTON EAS 23.00 1055 South Grady Way PAGEeO1 OF 005 Renton,WA 98055 05/03/2004 08:47 KING COUNTY, UA • E,XCISE.TAX NOT REQUIRED co.fieCelCiS Division SY QOp Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: l pi.lg as Project File#: Street Intersection or Project Name: Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Si-, Ant kent S r i s k 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation Additional legal is.on page of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: l i 79 S eH9.e over a •Po e4-,o ,k era L©+s 9;' 1O Zl gna. ZL, Block. fie. Pk+ of Sr&i.J&ttS F%P#l. A dot:)-1 as t eccwa !lo l ,ni 16 o ?/afs, S- p e_ 33 ('cords ©f" K ;ni Coot+y , I.✓asI.;/5 Y• . A-Alb +1.0,4- po.r-1-;e of r'ots 9 - 0 k as—, inC1lvs%v , g 1 o G i` i oc- ke- Pl k I— erC.. S :4I.e: Fov r.{�. f�o�J;fl o►i , As 12-r eotc't.eal ;vt ✓©I n u� i ii o� PIct+S , pas 19, tecorcks To5e r t,.3 f -}►,a$- ,Dort oc Ve&e.de& 'tA/; or+1\ Aver S 0(AA-,-, , otj o; - Lp s. S;4uctj e fi-e_ So 0 ,,a eS-j- fru ct c{-{r Seel-;crvs /9, rlydLA) �i, AS �,;:p 23 1uor+L, ni,e 5. `4 AS &✓./vi, �`� 1Le. �dy 12e h+ram;, i Ce)O l+Y , L M L;t-j'pY". PWE0013.doc\ Page I FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2-21-97 That said Grantor(s),for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell, convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities(including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington,more particularly described on page 1. (or if fill legal is not on page 1—Exhibit A.) For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this /$y of /3' '1 2040 c Patrick J.Sursely Attorney-In-Fact PWE0013.doc1 Page 2 FORM 03 0013/bh/CA2-21-97 For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining Water Line utilities and utility pipelines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require: This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1.The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee.2.Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to:a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b.Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c.Develop, landscape;or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein.d.Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities.e.Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way.This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be 1 finding upon the parties,their heirs,successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement.By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever.IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this J r*, day of lee. l ,2004. CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT' Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this If iL day of . ft C- ,2004,before me personally , appeared bp.)--.1, K J. J JAtfixtknown to be/-}7eic.a het-poration that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free 1 and voluntary act and deed of said corporatidn,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument ��\\111N1t 1'I J.Fo if and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. // 11 Eck °_7a��' �/% % Notary Publ' and for S f Washin on • ~ �'� l' to , G 1 No �,''7.08�O ?AZ'- My appointment expires: /,/c JJ 6 d'//� Op WASN��"� 11//S 0J `7 rlllllllll\WS' • • Exhibit"A" St.Anthony Church Public Water Easement-Legal Description A utility easement over a portion of Lots 9, 10,21 and 22,Block 1 of the plat of Smithers Fifth Addition,as recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,at Page 33,records of King County,Washington. AND that portion of Lots 9 through 15,inclusive,Block 1 of the plat of Smithers Fourth Addition,as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,at Page 19,records of King County,Washington. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Whitworth Avenue South,adjoining said Lots. Lying in a 15.00 foot wide strips of land,being 7.50 feet on both sides of the following described centerlines: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 7,Block 1 of the plat of Smithers Fifth Addition,as recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,at Page 33,records of King County,Washington; thence South 00°20'02"West,along the west line of said Block 1,a distance of 120.80 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 89°31'41"East,a distance of 237.79 feet; thence South 00°28'19"West,a distance of 14.80 feet; thence North 00°28'19"East,a distance of 14.80 feet; thence South 88°42'57"East,a distance of 60.60 feet; thence North 01°20'36"East,a distance of 27.72 feet; thence North 46°20'36"East,a distance of 6.35 feet; thence North 00°05'15"East,a distance of 10.09 feet to the North line of vacated Whitworth Avenue as recorded under Recording No.20031017004074; thence South 00°05'15"West,a distance of 10.09 feet; thence South 46°20'36"West,a distance of 6.35 feet; thence South 01°20'36"West,a distance of 27.72 feet; thence South 88°45'31"East,a distance of 60.52 feet; thence South 89°33'10"East,a distance of 64.25 feet; thence South 89°49'45"East,a distance of 11.70 feet; thence South 00°10'15"West,a distance of 8.36 feet; thence North.00°10'15"East,a distance of 8.36 feet; thence North 89°49'45"West,a distance of 11.70 feet; thence South 00°19'59"West,a distance of 75.29 feet; thence North 86°39'27"West,a distance of 8.29 feet; thence South 86°39'27"East,a distance of 8.29 feet; thence South 00°19'59"West,a distance of 146.00 feet; ! 2-01) thence South 42°55'02"West,a distance of 20.67 feet to the south line of said Lot 15 and the terminus of centerline fr4 easement. w Q % `,‘\ kiff .a., / It is the intent of this description that sidelines shall extend or truncate as necessary to intersect at boundary lines and ••"I intersections. % .A` �» S Situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 18,Township l Y 40AS 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in the City of Renton,King LA IS) County,Washington. ;, DARES 05-23-2005 • I Exhibit 7 1 7 1 \ ii��q111/ Saint Anthony's Parish Q�'�N wsy�uo Water Easement ,,f-r ��01100, jam,,°�'yr1'• cn / _ z ¢ ALLEY I " , Fs 'Pe 38965 O J� + I/ '�lpAd'' �lSTE�F SOS 7 4' dedicated to the Y 24 'Y�� NANO City of Renton. Rec. No. 20031017004074. i not to scale �ii :::�:: :.? ,;00;,,, 23 8 23 22 / • 22 1 fir . . .. •' � 10 " , 10 :: 21 w / V0ACffiAE 0R4ec7 5N 00 / .:i:(.1:, ,,,z0OS''‘ 20 ge.4040 1.,,,, „„ ,..„ R • O • 17 O 4 15 ^5 15 I— - - - - - - FOURTH ISTREET - - - - A - e Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 0 Renton,WA 98055 0019P9 30000® CITY OF 12 PAGE001 KING3COUNTY08wp7 • ' ea '5150 BILL OF1SALE Proj Name:cj"j, Nan-v. 1y Property Tax Parcel Number: SeE NTTp -tj o . Project File#:U 0504 27 Street Intersection: 4-al 4 aivc4Address: 14 5,41 cJ'r, Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): COePoegTtoJ ot✓ THE Grantee(s): 1. CATHoLic t raci.io 1cs ce .. GE 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 2. Sekrri..lc The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: Length Size km 12.0S L.F.of 12 " D1 Water Main SO L.F.of 6 I)1 Water Main 129 L.F.of Co " 01 Water Main lb each of 12. " Gate Valves I I each of e. " Gate Valves Z each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM:• Length Size Tyne 74 L.F.of Co " PVC. Sewer Main L.F.of Sewer Main L.F.of " Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes • each of " Lift Stations STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: ILath Size T e L.F.of 12. - 2 Storm Main . L.F.of " Storm Main 1 L.F.of 72" " Tr_ Storm Mara MN I each of .54" " ar.. Storm Inlet et NH 10 each of — .S Storm Catch Basin (o each of 45 " 1 Manhole i STREET IMPROVMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk 50 L.F. Asphalt Pavement SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles )nog _®b 14thLJ By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoeve lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. O:\Foints\PBPW\BILLSALE2.DOC\bh Page 1 " • •V IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor caused this instrument to be executed this 3 day of March_20 04 ric . Sursely, Attorney-in-Fact INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF AMNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • signed this instrument on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING zn_ ) On this 11 day oft—/r(-• ,20, c/before me personally appeared rr Ot to me known to OW�;+,0�il_t I be �Grri .vim of the corporation that ,�•_ t//-�"C.14 ttp e r/. executed the 'n instrument and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free •olt -O Z� 'rr,,s NS Al and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein O • V Z %mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said •, a instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • b . ' Op W AS '' - Notary Pu • fo e State of Washington �' ••, Notary(Print),VA.t/a /rf•GwTTe.4Msw-A) My appointment expires: G -.V7-O r, Dated: 0:Worms\PBPW\BILLSALE2.DOC\bh Page 2 St. Anthony Bill of Sale (Tax Parcel Numbers) 7839800150 7839800181 7839800185 7840800050 7840800055 7840800060 7840800065 7840800070 7840800075 7841300035 7841300080 7841300090 7841300100 7841300105 7841300120 7841300125 7841300110 7840800105 2._—orkt 1 Return Addr1way s: City Clerk's 1111111111811111111111111111111111 20031008 Renton,WA 98055 INI//ff , CITY OF RENTON DP 21.00 10/08//01 2003F16:07 KING COUNTY, UA DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number:784130-0035,784130-0125 . Project File#: LUA-03-005/PRM-25-033 Street Intersection: Whitworth Avenue and Alley Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: N/A Additional reference numbers are on page: N/A Grantor(s): Grantees) 1. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle,a 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation Washington Corporation Sole LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the following described parcel:Lots 7 and 24.Block I,Smithers Fifth Addition to, the Town of Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,page 33 in King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent,which attached by operation of law,by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883,recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. Described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest comer of said Lot 7;thence South 89°37'26"East along the north lines of said Lots 7 and 24 and the north line of said vacated alley,a distance of 256.04 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 24;thence South 00°20'32" - West,along the east line of said Lot 24,a distance of 4.00 feet;thence North 89°37'26"West,a distance of 256.04 feet to a point on the west line of said Lot 7;thence North 00°20'02"East,along said line,a distance of 4.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 1 ALL SITUATE in the City of Renton,County of King and the State of Washington. . The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Granter(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): ity of Renton • _, .,t. vim` : �¢� ryt u. C- h Mayor , City Clerk r • .� Y-6-Aoo3 ! '•\‘‘\\"111(I1' . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ' M. 4114 ill )SS y.v`w••�� i �?. • COUNTY OF KING ) �L'J'tt‘45tO4rtr tra/�� On this day personally appeared before me,Patrick J.Sursely,to me known to be the �� ,,, Attorney-in-Fact of the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle,a Corporation Sole,the i '' $ corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said jI A4 00 I jr .1 instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation;for the uses and purposes ,j e � ,� q O�J'06�� t therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the ,�/�4 tIigat„„��%.��`�d` seal affixed,if any,is the corporate seal of said corporation. r 'r1 Lip ili a �• �� EN under my nd and official seal this 1Wy nday of ,2003 , ( , (Print name of notary) .0P1. / r r *r......,,o„r,r^:..^"4 for the State of Washington residing at 564#We, WILSj 1 HV'D1?. us: ii-05 -mob Page 1 FORM 04 0001/bh E1993979 . 10/08/2003 16:07 KING COUNTY, 52.00 • • ` Exhibit A • Legal Description • That portion of the fdllowing described parcel: Lots 7 and 24,Block:I,Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,page 33 in King County,Washington; TOGETHER.WI'aI that portion of vacated alley adjacent,which attached by _ operation.of law,by City of Renton.Ordinance Number 4883,recorded under King County Recording Number 2001011700.1672. Described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence South 89°37'26" East,along the north lines of said Lots 7 and 24 and the north line-of said vacated alley,a distance of 256.04 feet•to'the northeast corner of said Lot 24; thence South 00°20'32" West,along the east line of said Lot 24,a distance of 4.00 feet; thence North 89'37'26" West,a distance of 256.04 feet to a point on the west line of said Lot 7; thence North 00°20'02"East,along said line,a distance of 4.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. ALL SITUATE in the City of Renton,County of King and the State of Washington. r.t.i., ... , .,„ _ ,,,... , , _ , ....., P• :,..; . , ,,_, ,6-1, :-.:, . ,..„,,, cA 4 1.L _ EXPIRES'12/95143 1 .. Page 2 FORM 04 0001/bh e • • Exhibit B Map • • - • - South 3r approx.256' 4'toMI •-. •.. -. • • rink t/) • �� a„ • approx 280'X 16' "LW 7841300125• ii to be vacated • • ■ • -'n 7841300120 -Ls) in t. •it - AM,_ v =7.,<t--_-'-ti 7840800050 77840800110 tri • 7841300035 7841300105 �_y•• • " = 7840800055 'a 7840800105 rt= 7840800060 7841300100 _ <r£1 A = r • a 7840800065 p 7841300090 _ • 7840800070 A F rye.=s • 7840800075 7841300080 ='= a x . 1 i • :. LA I • • co h _ _ _ approx 280'X 60'•ROW to be vacated . I. -- i I i • • • Page 3 FORM 04 0001/bh • I , 1,1,&,- eQ,a-as/ . Return Address: City. Clerk's Office 20030514000836 City of Renton C OF 1 REN 1 9AG 37.00 1055 S. Grady Way 03/14/2003 10:19 Renton WA ' 98055 KING COUNTY, WA Please print or type information WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (RCW 65.04) Document Titles)(or transactions contained therein):(all areas applicable to your document must be filled in) City of Renton Development Agreement concerning - i. Whitworth St Vac & St Anthony's Pagisi • 3. including Exhibit A - . 4. . Reference Numbers) of Documents assigned or released: - Additional reference#'s on page of document • . • . Grantor(s) (Last name,first name,initials) ' . • 1. St Anthony's Parish ' 2. • • ' Additional names on page of document . • . • Grantee(s) (Last name first,then first name and initials) 1. City of 'Renton , 2. - Additional names on page of document. • • Legal description. (abbreviated: i.e.lot,block,plat or section,township,range) The following matters affntt'the property covered. . . . Additional legal is on page 10 of document. . . • • + esor's p ty Pro Tax Parcel/Account Number El Assessor Tax#not yet assigned l0-0080 ' The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to. verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document. • Signature of Requesting Party 1 • I • r Zt CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING WHITWORTH STREET VACATION AND ST.ANTHONY'S PARISH Doi This Development Agreement is made and entered into this 1� day of 77/eatii 00�by and between the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation("City"or "Renton"), and St. Anthony's Parish,through The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole("St. Anthony's"). RECITALS WHEREAS, St. Anthony's Parish first was sited and has existed in the same general location since 1905; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's now is the owner of most of the property informally described as follows and designated as the"Bounded Property": (A)multiple parcels bounded by, on the east Morris Ave. S., on the west Shattuck Ave. S., on the north the alley between South 3rd and South 4th Streets, and on the south, South 4th Street, and(B)multiple parcels currently developed with the Parish Social Hall located at South 4th Street and Morris Ave. S (the "Bounded Property"); WHEREAS,the Bounded Property lies within the Center Downtown District of Renton, generally bordered by on the east I-405, on the west Shattuck Ave. S., on the north Airport Way and the Cedar River, and on the south Houser Way. This Development Agreement applies to those portions of the"Bounded Property"owned by St. Anthony's and is intended to expand to cover any parcels within the Bounded Property that are subsequently acquired by St. Anthony's. A formal legal description of the property within the Bounded Property that is owned by St. Anthony's is attached and incorporated in full as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's has approached Renton requesting that Renton vacate a portion of Whitworth Avenue north of South 4th Street,where Whitworth bisects church property and vacate an associated alley(hereafter collectively referred to for ease as the vacation of "Whitworth"); WHEREAS, St. Anthony's is proposing a twenty-year project on the proposed church campus, to be accomplished in four phases (the"Campus Project"); WHEREAS,before proceeding with the Campus Project, St. Anthony's wishes assurance from Renton that the necessary Whitworth right-of-way will be vacated so that St. Anthony's can have a unified campus; WHEREAS,Renton wishes to keep Whitworth open for circulation as long as possible, to delay the closure of that street until such time as construction is imminent and to provide for reconveyance of title to Renton, should it vacate the right-of-way of Whitworth and St. Anthony's then not proceed with the Campus Project; 1 • WHEREAS, St. Anthony's wishes to delay the expenditure of the street vacation fee until a point closer in time to actual initiation of construction; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's wishes to assure future development of its Renton property; WHEREAS,the Renton City Council, at its regular meeting on April 23, 2001, stated its intention of granting the requested street and alley vacation, and on July 15, 2002,the Renton City Councilby unanimous vote approved entry into a form of Development Agreement incorporating the terms herein; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2002, St.Anthony's withdrew land use applications for a rectory to be located!at 215 Whitworth Avenue as was requested by the City Council; NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the promises, covenants and provisions set forth herein,the receipt and adequacy of which consideration is hereby acknowledged,the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1.0 STREET VACATION PROCESS 1.1 I Street Vacation Contingent on Permits. The Campus Project includes a major structure which occupies the current location of the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue. The administration of Renton will prepare and present an ordinance vacating the requested portions of Whitworth Avenue and the alley(s)to the Renton City Council for reading and adoption at the first available date at the time that building permits are ready to be issued. 1.2 Payment of Compensation. Prior to the adoption of the vacation ordinance, for example, at the time the vacation ordinance is noted for presentation, St. Anthony's shall pay to the City the amount of compensation due as determined by the City Council,pursuant to state law,but in no event more than the full appraised value of the vacated property, as adjusted herein for other dedications. The appraisal process and other street vacation processes may begin as soon as this Development Agreement is executed. 1.3 Utilities. The parties agree that there are currently significant municipal utilities within the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue. As part of the street vacation ordinance,the City of Renton will retain a utility easement for those utilities,or that easement will be granted as part of St.Anthony's development application, conditional use permit, or site plan approval, as may be necessary, St. Anthony's may agree to reroute the utilities to a location that is acceptable to the City of Renton so that the operation of the utilities is not more expensive to the City of Renton, and such that the utilities function in an equivalent or better manner than those utilities in the utilities' current location. Any utilities relocated onto private property shall be within a dedicated easement in a form acceptable to the City of Renton. Any relocation, oversizing or latecomers charges are governed by the City Code or applicable requirements and not by this Development Agreement. 2 • • 1.4 Reconveyance. Should the City of Renton adopt a street vacation ordinance, and St. Anthony's begins construction,but does not follow through with the construction or takes actions that would otherwise make the use of Whitworth by St. Anthony's unnecessary for the Campus Project, and abandons those projects or make no progress upon them for a period of five years after the street vacation ordinance is adopted,then St. Anthony's agrees that it will reconvey the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue,previously vacated by Renton,back to Renton upon payment to St. Anthony's,by Renton, of a sum equal to the amount paid by St. Anthony's as a fee for the street vacation(i.e., the appraised fair market value of the property, or portion of the fair market value charged by the City for the street vacation), and St. Anthony's shall also remove any partial construction that may exist and restore the street to its previously existing condition. Provided however, that the five year progress period shall be tolled during any time period during which St. Anthony's progress on the Campus Project is impeded due to third party interference or delay, including appeals or litigation,Acts of God, or other events beyond the reasonable control of St. Anthony's. 1.5 Exchange of Right-of-Way. Subject to approval of land use application file no. LUA-02-054, and to provide for improved traffic circulation, St.Anthony's shall dedicate to Renton four feet on the south side of the alley running east and west between Shattuck and Whitworth, south of South 3rd Street,to provide an additional four feet of right-of-way,which the City represents will then provide a total 24-foot wide alley right-of-way. St. Anthony's shall further improve the alley to accommodate two lanes of traffic,by providing appropriate striping. The value of the dedication of land shall be credited square foot by square foot against the value of the alley vacation. 2.0 CONTINUING ACCESS ACROSS ST. ANTHONY'S CAMPUS. 2.1 North-South Driveway. The proposed first two phases of the Campus Project, as shown in City land use application file no. LUA-02-054,include a driveway proceeding generally north to south, along the to-be-vacated Whitworth Avenue, then west to east,then north to south along the to-be-vacated alley area between and parallel to Whitworth and Morris Avenues. The driveway location is not a public through street,but will not be gated unless deemed necessary for security purposes. The parties acknowledge and agree that later phases of the Campus Project or subsequent campus development during the term of this Agreement may cause the driveway location and alignment to change. 2.2 North-South Pedestrian corridor. The first two phases of the Campus Project, as shown in City land use application file no. LUA-02-054,include a pedestrian corridor adjoining a driveway proceeding generally north to south, along the to-be-vacated Whitworth Avenue,then west to east,then north to south again along the to-be-vacated alley area between and parallel to Whitworth and Morris Avenues. A public pedestrian access easement will be granted to the City and the City will be responsible for maintenance and repair of the sidewalk. The City of Renton agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold St. Anthony's harmless from all claims, liens, losses, liabilities, and causes of action for damages to property or personal injury resulting from actions or omissions of the City, its employees, agents, contractors, or representatives arising from the use and development of the aforementioned sidewalk. The City of Renton's indemnification obligations survive termination or expiration of any other elements of this Agreement. The 3 parties acknowledge and agree that later phases of the Campus Project or subsequent campus development;during the term of this Agreement may cause the pedestrian corridor location and alignment to change and agree that the pedestrian access easement may be temporarily suspended during later construction and relocated. 2.3 Neighboring Access and Parking. As conditioned herein, St. Anthony's shall provide the Zerbato family with a twenty-foot wide easement coextensive with the general location of the North-South driveway described in section 2.1. St. Anthony's shall grant an easement allowing parking in 5 stalls of off street parking adjacent to the Zerbato property for the Zerbato property's employee and customer parking, in the general location shown on Exhibit "B". This driveway and parking easement shall be extinguished if the property owner of the Zerbato parc'el states in writing that the owner no longer wants such an easement or the Zerbato parcel is sold. The 5 parking stalls will be signed to allow usage by the Zerbato businesses during weekday business hours. 3.0 ADDITIONAL PROPERTY&USES 3.1 Allowed Expansion. This Development Agreement will expand to cover any property within the Bounded Property that is acquired by St. Anthony's. When additional land within the Bounded Property is acquired, the parties agree to execute an addendum to this Development Agreement to add those lands to the property description provided in Exhibit A. 3.2 i Different Uses. This Development Agreement does not apply to and does not limit the ability of St. Anthony's or other affiliated organizations to acquire lands outside the Bounded Property,including lands within the City's current Center Downtown District, for other primary uses, including but not limited to residences, senior housing, low-income housing, and nursing services. 3.3 Disallowed Expansion. St. Anthony's Parish will limit its development of church, school, and!social outreach uses in the current"Center Downtown District"to the Bounded Property;provided however,that St.Anthony's may hold title to additional property within the Center Downtown District, including property acquired by gift, donation or devise, so long as the Parish or Archdiocese does not seek land use entitlements for church, school, and social outreach uses for any property that is outside the Bounded Property. 3.4, Transitional Uses. As St. Anthony's Parish prepares the Bounded Property for future development, it may be necessary to situate existing or approved uses in transitional locations within the Bounded Property that were not specified under the Conditional Use Permit, City Land Use application file no. LUA-02-054, granted by the City or subsequent Conditional Use Permits. In such instances, St. Anthony's shall be required to obtain a Temporary Use Permit to confirm the specific use and location. The term of any Temporary Use Permit shall be determined by the City with reference to the time required to complete development work necessitating the relocation of the use. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to require additional land use entitlements for church-, school-, or social outreach-related uses that do not require construction of new, or expanded or remodeled buildings,regardless of their location within the Bounded Property. 4 4.0 PARKING 4.1 Increase in Number of Spaces. After completion of Phase I of the Campus Project, St. Anthony's will have approximately 230 parking spaces on its land within the Bounded Property. The parties agree that this is a significant increase from the 112 spaces currently provided on-site(this 112 total includes 15 spaces on the portion of Whiteworth Avenue to be vacated). Accordingly,the parties agree that after the completion of Phase I, the available on-site parking for the Parish will have markedly improved. 4.2 Parking Management. This agreement does not preclude the City from requesting development and implementation of a parking management plan if necessary to accommodate parking demand created by approval of future land use entitlements for new or expanded uses within the Bounded Property. 5.0 VESTING 5.1 Vested Rights for Future Development. During the term of this Development Agreement, St. Anthony's shall have the right to develop lands within the Bounded Property in accordance with the City of Renton ordinances and regulations in effect on the date of this agreement, including but not limited to,parking requirements and permit procedures,but excepting any applicable impact,mitigation and permit fees,Uniform Fire Codes,Uniform Building Codes, similar fire and building codes, and City ordinances implementing fire and building codes, or other regulations necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. 5.2 Agreement to Conceptual Plan. The City agrees that future phases of development for the Campus Project including an expanded church, a rectory with public spaces, and redevelopment of the existing school building are appropriate for the Bounded Property,but that new or expanded buildings for church, school,or social outreach uses are subject to subsequent detailed permit review. No permit level approval is granted by this Agreement. St. Anthony's agrees that, as part of a later phase of development, the school portables will be removed from the campus. The parties acknowledge and agree that the term of this Development Agreement may exceed the Parish's current 20-year plans for development, and that the Parish's plans are conceptual and,therefore, St. Anthony's may request development approvals for projects different from or in addition to the development generally described above and nothing in this Development Agreement prohibits such a request. 5.3 Optional Vesting. If a City policy, or zoning or development regulation is amended that eases development requirements within the Bounded Property, then St. Anthony's has the right to opt to apply the revised regulations to future development applications. 5 6.0 STRUCTURE DESIGN 6.1 , Structure Design for Phase I and II of the Campus Project. Development of new buildings implementing Phase I and II of the Campus Project/20-year Master Plan that is approved for the Bounded Property under City Land Use application file no. LUA-02-054 shall be constructed with appropriate footings and foundations capable of supporting additional stories allowed under the City's codes for the primary school and assembly uses contained in those new buildings,under the parish's planned construction method. 7.0 TERM AND AMENDMENT 7.1 Effective Date and Term. This Development Agreement is effective as of the last date executed below and for twenty-five(25)years thereafter. 7.2 Termination Upon Land Transfer. This Development Agreement shall terminate as to any portions of the Bounded Property that St. Anthony's ceases to own and transfers to any entity not affiliated with St. Anthony's church, school, and social outreach.services. 7.3 Amendment. This Development Agreement may be amended at any time upon mutual agreement of the parties. The parties specifically agree to meet in good faith to review the Agreement for appropriate amendments upon the tenth(loth), and twentieth(20th) anniversaries of the Agreement. In addition,if the Center Downtown zoning designation is revised to call for less intense development on the Bounded Property or other lands within the Center Downtown zone, then the parties agree to a good faith review of the Development Agreement for appropriate amendments. 8.0 AUTHORITY TO APPROVE AGREEMENT 8.1 , All signing parties represent and warrant that they have taken all necessary steps to authorize ;such act and that execution of this Development Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 and is valid and binding for all purposes, subject only to subsequent appeals, if any, filed in accordance with RCW 36.70B.200. 9.0 GENERAL TERMS 9.1 Integration. This Development Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and no prior oral or written agreement shall be valid. 9.2 Venue and Governing Law. Venue for all disputes arising under or connected with this Development Agreement shall be in the Superior Court for King County. This Development Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with Washington law. 9.3 No Waiver of Police Power or Condemnation Authority. The City does not waive its police power or condemnation authority by entering into this Development Agreement, except as provided by RCW 36.70B.170 et seq. 6 • 9.4 Attorneys Fees. In any action arising under or related to this Development Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to be paid its reasonable attorneys fees, expenses, and costs by the non-prevailing party. 9.5 Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or portion of this Development Agreement is declared unlawful or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Development Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 7 • Dated this -- day of March, 2003. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole Its: P .SurseiyAnomet gct By: Its: City of Renton By: /9'4'1714' \o\\, �44 OF irR�6'4,T esse Tanner,Mayor y S .34 * SEAL *I- �.. Attest •_ 7EDStr't•` amlummmmit By: tedit44 t.G 4 GUG?g .ox� Bonnie" I. "Walton, City °Clerk On this day,personally appeared before me�� - ,who is the �;,� � of The Corporation of the Catholic of Seattle, a c�ion sole, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act with authorization of and on behalf of St. Anthony's Church and the Archdiocese of Seattle. Given under my hand and seal this, 'day of March,2003. O= pt 1p OON ''%, �� No P•6b i i and for the State of Washington :u residing at h.� ; LJ,i'? My appointment expires: 7-D6 ill lc.°FIII `WASN 8 • On this day,personally appeared before me, ,who is the of The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole,to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act with authorization of and on behalf of St. Anthony's Church and the Archdiocese of Seattle. Given under my hand and seal this day of March 2003. • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at My appointment expires: Now comes the Honorable Jesse Tanner who is the Mayor of the City of Renton and states that he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act on behalf of the City of Renton. Given under my hand and seal this !2*day of March,2003. E v��SioN• tii, ‘ • ',�, 1411/Ad, ThialtitAtAt Michele Mitt inifl No rARY��n Notary PubhO�/}n the for tate of Washington i •o o N•• i residing at Ke Ul • PUBUG My appointment expires: WHP•00,5 IIIcrj819p5. 9 • • EXHIBIT A Fran memmn r nna • T0: Catholic Archbishop Property 215 Columbia Sweet t 910 Marion Street Seattle,Washington Seattle, WA 98104 911104 Attn, Paula Marter Ref.J Renton Property • SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 • • PLAT Order Number: 473062 The following, matters affect the property covered by this order: • • The legal description has been amended to read as follows: PARCEL 1:. Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton. according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 2: The portion of Lot 8. Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume: 10 of Plate. page 28, in King County, Washington. described.as follows:- Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence north 89°47' east 120.00 feet; • •• -Thence south 00°13.' east.20.00 feet;- • ' Thence south 65°33'20" west 21.93 feet: • Thence south 89'47' west 100.00 feet; • Thence north 00°13' west 29.00 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 3: • Lots 8 and 9, Block 35. Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to' the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plata, page 28, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 8, described as follows: (continued) • • . • SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT • Page 2 Order No. 473062 • Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence running east along the northerly boundary thereof to the • northeast corner of said Lot 9; Thence south 00'13' east 20 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 8; Thence south 65.33'20' west 21.93 feet; Thence south 89'47'- west 100 feet to the westerly boundary of said Lot'e; Thence northerly along the westerly—boundary of said Lot 8-to the point of beginning of this exception. PARCEL 4: Lot 9, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in Xing County. Washington. PARCEL S: • Lot 10. Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton. according to-the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, • • page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 6: • Lot 11, Block 1. Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to •the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 7: Lot 12, Block 1. Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11.of Plats, page 19, in King County, Waehington. • PARCEL 8: Lot 13 and the north half of the north 20 feet of Lot 14, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plate, page 19, in Icing County, Washington. ' ' (continued) • • SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT Page 3 Order No. 473062 PARCEL 9: The south 30 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19, • Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according • to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats. page 19, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions of Lots 1S and 16. conveyed to the City of Renton, for roads, by deeds recorded under King County Recording Numbers 7305180516 and 7305180517. • PARCEL 10: • Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block.1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof • recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33 in King County, Washington; EXCEPT chat portion of Lot 15 conveyed to the City of Renton, for road, by deed recorded under Xing County Recording Number • 7305180518; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672, PARCEL 11: • Lots 16 and the south half of Lot 17, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof • recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 16 conveyed to the City of Renton. for road, by deed recorded under King County Recording Number • 7305180515: TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached • • by operation of law., by. City of Renton Ordinance Number'4883, . • - recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. . PARCEL 12: The north half of Lot 17 and all of Lot 18. Block 1, Smithers Fifth • Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof • recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated.alley adjacent, which attached • by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. (continued) • 3UPPLEHEnTAL TITLE REPORT • Page 4 . Order No. 473062 • PARCEL 13: - Lots 19 and 20. Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat •thereof recorded is Volume 16 of Platy. page 33, in King County. Washington; • TOGETHER-WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached. by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. . PARCEL 14: • Lots 21 and 22, Block 1. Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; • TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4083, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. • PARCEL 15: • Lot 23, Block 1, Smithery Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16. of Plata. page 33. in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WIZ1i that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672; • • PARCEL 16: Lot 24, Block 1, Smithery Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, • - • according•to the plat thereof.recorded.in Volume •1G_of.Platt; • page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the • property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as of April 25, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY art Marilyn Sanders )iS02 Title Officer • Phone Number: 206-343-1345 • PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.cor) Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtisopnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Georgean Moore (georgeanmoore®pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Debby Bigelow (debbybigelowepnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206)343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Pacific Northwest Title • 215 Columbia Street Title Order No. : 460265 Seattle, WA 98104-1511 Attention: Dian Your Ref. : 41068676 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: November 28, 2001, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount $ 242,500.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 945.00 • Tax (8.8%) $ 83.16 Proposed Insured: CORPORATION OF -THE CATHOLIC ARCH BISHOP FO SEATTLE NOTE: IF.EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS •OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED • FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY. US•AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: . ALBERT W. FINSETH, as his separate estate 4: The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page• 2, attached. • • • Order No. 460265 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 . The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 21, Block 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. • END OF SCHEDULE A • • • • NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lt 21, Blk 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton,• V11/P19 • • PACIFIC• NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (tarilynsandenWpnwt.corn) Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtisepnwt.coca) Senior Title Officer, Georgean Moore (georgeanmooregpnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Debby Bigelow (debbybigelowepnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206)343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 • • Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street Title Order No. : .460264 Seattle, WA 98027 . Attention: Dale Your Ref. : Bereiter A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: November 28, 2001, at 8:00 a.m.• 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount $ 242,500.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 945.00 Tax (8.84) $ 83.16 Proposed Insured: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCH BISHOP OF SEATTLE NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED 'FOR A PENDING .TRANSACTION, PLEASE•NOTIFY• US AT LEAST-ONE• WEEK PRIOR • ' TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is ;covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. 'The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: ALBERT W. FINSETH, as his separate estate • 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: • As on Schedule A, page 2, attached., • A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Order No. 460264 SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this ,commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: • Lot 22, Block 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A • • • • • NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: • _ The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description . within the body of the document. Lt 22, Blk 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, V11/P19 • EXHIBIT B - • it 5 ;v • FfINQE�RA!1 11f _. _rJi f¢ /2SMf 11 4¢ o g3RD - µ� 1 , • k V�� En .r. di' . ii III .. •, . • w :r ':: :: {' �•---� . .. . • FEZ :::a: ,f �] 3µ 8 �� E ,•• - . . ZERBATO �� SPACES FA : .\ • �� • • :$:ice•+.•.}}:}:}Q,.%.:.;_• •f.•�: 1r•:. .:•: V ••15 :; - iIDI DI tbi` • k .e,1....L4t3 r.„..._42,r1_,.4.%.4...,,,c ..... .. • ti . . 4TH Z4. • ., . !!"IR •• • . L I :: :7111 1f ==y.��-`—� — e'� '_ t ony CatFi If cChurch�.-. �.--- _ I�i L PLAN\• 1 ill ,...,...... r--� r=-I w,mn.. , ..:1. i _:,i.=... i...:ii1;i_...... '�-ej( • ::P- —� !��Illlr ' \IRO�� r _• tavx `t ... v.o. _ •jI „=� , i.• _i r _m:�l 1 I I '�'1 I III . . II li . ,_____I : Milir- .41111.ft :5 -::. 1 r l �.� `. j 1iil' iI, g- � (,1 I rW.m.s. 1 / 1-' =.•-•..w— ..., d . ,...1 1 nant.at......, . , a�C.ilis I I' - mo' _ �i �_ 3 omnnw won S��• iG'�-� • ']i i • u� • ...t..- 1 %I \ =� -��-iii me {ate _ -_— _ .�� I I a r•:-1".....\=1_, *Er-z,••lc, :.• ....=w,.., ___,.__.r_.?____.• .11141011.6 ailliFM I ill— ........x. 1( ` 1 • omeunon y. i•'rb otqBV7 � : • , _. IIL \IF - Cri I.4L'-.;17-7.L.. 'NMI ti 1 brirr-------z... 1. —r,.... ,=, ...,F ti .., ---, ii --..... I '.•:. i,,f. . 9 •, 411P,-. ..7. 1"" 1' ' I_ _ _ mso r I — ::...-._ ;Pi- t - �. ��. y' • June 23,2003 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 224 single-family unit that are within the boundary of the assessment district. In addition, simple interest will accrue at a rate of 4.86%for a period of ten years. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance finalizing the East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill Phase I Special Assessment District be presented for first reading.* Councilman Corman noted that homeowners only pay the connection fee when they hook-up to the sewer system. *MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 227 for ordinance.) _ Utility: NE 10th St/Anacortes Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending Council Ave NE Storm System concur with the staff recommendation to approve a$150,000 fund transfer from Improvement,Fund Transfer, the SW 7th St. Storm System Improvement Project to the NE 10th St. and Anacortes Ave.NE Detention Pond and Storm System Improvement Project for funding of construction cost increases due to change orders and changes in bid item quantities,if needed. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning &Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Committee recommending acceptance of St. Anthony's Parish dedication of the portion of Development Services: St. the alley(four feet parallel to the south side of the east-west alley between Anthony's Parish,Alley Shattuck and Whitworth Avenues S.)agreed upon as part of the exchange of Dedication, Shattuck& right-of-way set forth by the development agreement, dated March 11, 2003, Whitworth Ayes S between the City of Renton and St.Anthony's Parish. The Committee further i V"`',l k— p't -oQ ' recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute I the deed of dedication. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning &Development Majority Report: Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere Committee Majority Report presented a majority report regarding the determination of compensation for St. Vacation: Compensation, 'Anthony's Parish street vacations for portion of Whitworth Ave. S. and a- Whitworth Ave S &Alley, St. portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Anthony's Parish,VAC-00-003 Avenues S. and S, 3rd and 4th Streets(VAC-00-003 and VAC-03-001). • &VAC-03-001 As part of implementing the approved master plan for St.Anthony's Parish campus, Council approval was obtained for the vacation of specific portions of right-of-way situated within the campus boundaries. At the time of the initial street vacation request,State law regarding compensation for vacated rights-of- way allowed Council to set compensation at 50% of the appraised value of the vacated property. However, current State law allows the amount of _ compensation to be determined by the City Council and to be no more than the full appraised value. This was reiterated in Section 1.2 of the development agreement entered into by the City of Renton and St. Anthony's Parish on March 11,2003. The Committee recognized the benefits to be gained from the development of a unified campus for St.Anthony's Parish by both the citizens of Renton,as well as for the City's downtown core. Therefore,the Committee(majority) recommended a reduction in the amount of compensation to be required for street vacation VAC-00-003 ($183,360 full value)and VAC-03-001 ($19,200 full value). APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date 6-a3-aoo3 II COMMITTEE REPORT' June 23,2003 St.Anthony's Parish Alley Dedication • (Referred June 16,2003) The Planning and Development Committee recommends the acceptance of St. Anthony's dedication of the_portion of the alley(four feet parallel to the south side..of the east-west alley between Shattuck and Whitworth Avenues South) agreed upon as part of the exchange of right-of-way set forth by the Development Agreement, dated March 11, 2003, entered into by the City of Renton and St.Anthony's Parish:: . >> z..,Th., The Committee further recommedsthat the_Council authozize,the Mayor and the City Clerk y.3 to execute the deed of dedication:"'=� _ " ,w,• ` ; ts�• r", •`', ',.iy• \ •• . ,�; s.. :�� a ,/e/t/Iti •C.t a ^f ^. 1,sE Terri Bri e, Chair . `b:, ,�> <;\' w= ,. ,,=' .,„ ;.• •''fir.. '•,t`•, I ik,Y Dag law $n, ice Chair 1' 1 g'arker,Member cc: Lesley Nishihira Karen McFarland Jennifer Henning ^ Neil Watts • comm rpt-ded\ Rev 01/02 bh. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the King County Journal --, 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 s - CITY OF RENTON a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING generalpublication and is now and has been for more than six monthsprior to the date of thatthe NOTICE IStHEREBYtyo GIVEN the Renton City Council has publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily fixed the 24th day of March,2003,at newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a 7:30 p.m.as the date and time for a • legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. public hearing-to be held in the of The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the KingCountyJournal not seventh floor Council S. Gradydyrs y, (andRenton City Hall,1055 Way, in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below stated Renton, WA 98055, to consider the - period. The annexed notice,a following: Petition for vacation of a portion • Of alley running north to south Petition for Vacation of a Portion of Alley between Whitworth and Morris ` Avenues South and between as published on: 2/28/03 . South 3rd and 4th Streets; St. . Anthony's Parish (McNabb); The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$62.25, charged to VAC-03-001. All interested parties are invited Acct. No.8050640. - to attend the hearing and present , written or oral comments regarding ' The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and interpretive Legal Number 845262 services for the hearing impaired will • be provided upon prior notice. For ' • (04/74 �2• ,information,call 425-430-6510. Legal Clerk, King County Journal Bonnie I.Walton 'City Clerk Published in -the—King-County . ' •y Journal February 28,2003.#845262• Subscribed and sworn before me on this a of t.1p 1 2003 - .T•Y------ - a�®��oriTo;1 fi- e 9�y�7A 0 f ,� Ket-0-1-9-_,_ 0\-c-446).„0._a, `� ', Notary Public of the State of Washin :,�' ,.,r residing in Renton ® errc, J••• a KingCounty,Washington e. ,: ,a3TA 37 : u:m 9 —G— SO � : �.o S o ®A, ,ot.„ ' 3•••�i.,:•ti,-;,yam e° • od'®1144^7dd666005°4b e CiN CU Oa?=osi CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 6 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH THROUGH THE CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE,A CORPORATION SOLE. WHEREAS, St. Anthony's Parish has been in existence in approximately the same general location, within the City of Renton, since 1905;and WHEREAS, St. Anthony's Parish, through the corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole (St. Anthony's) has approached the City of Renton concerning street vacation of Whitworth Avenue and associated alleyways; and WHEREAS, St. Anthony's is proposing certain development and redevelopment within its property; and WHEREAS, the vacation of Whitworth Avenue and associated alleys is crucial to St. Anthony's development and redevelopment plan;and WHEREAS, in order to regulate and control the timing of the development by St. Anthony's and the street vacation by the City of Renton, St. Anthony's and the City of Renton wish to enter into a development agreement;and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, believes that such Development Agreement will be to the benefit of St. Anthony's, the City, and the citizens of the City of Renton;and WHEREAS, such'a Development Agreement is authorized under RCW 36.70B.170 — 210;and WHEREAS,the parties have negotiated the proposed Development Agreement; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. 3623 WHEREAS, this Development Agreement has been presented at a public hearing before the City Council held on February 17, 2003; and WHEREAS, this Development Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Council of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the Development Agreement with St. Anthony's entitled "City of Renton Development Agreement Concerning Whitworth Street Vacation and St. Anthony's Parish." PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1 0 the day of March , 2003. si LUGS Z 7L) Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of March , 2003. sse Tanner,Mayor Approved as to form: oelatA),(24A4p Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney RES.968:2/27/03:ma 2 January 6,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 8- Development Services: Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a !" Architectural Projections in report regarding architectural projections in the setback area. The Committee Setback Areas met to discuss the allowed projections into building setback areas in single family residential zones. Current City Code language permits projections of up to 24 inches in setback areas for certain types of architectural projections including: eaves, cornices,uncovered porches,fireplaces,enclosed stair landings,bay and garden windows,and similar structures as determined by the zoning administrator. Although the City Code language does not explicitly state in what situations the standards are most appropriately applied,the existing language is suitably general in its ability to address the multitude of housing designs that are encountered during building plan review. Therefore,the Committee recommended that the City Code provision remains as is,and that it continues to be applied to single-family structures on a case-by-case basis. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Development Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Regulations (Title IV),Non- report regarding the proposed 2002 City Code Title IV(Development Substantive Amendments Regulations)amendments. The Committee reviewed the proposed Title IV amendments and associated issue paper on December 19,2002,and recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry whether section 15 of the proposed ordinance changes the current appeal process,Assistant City Attorney Wilson said he would investigate the matter. *MOTION CARRIED. (See page 11 for ordinance.) Development Services: Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Enforcement of Mitigation report regarding the enforcement of landscaping mitigation conditions for Conditions (Landscaping)for developments. Renton Municipal Code requires the installation of approved Developments landscaping on site before the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of landscape improvements may be requested due to seasonal planting difficulties, plant shortages,or when a project is impacted by a pending public works project. The City Code does not specifically address enforcement of these provisions. Subsequent to bringing the item to the Committee for discussion, a docket process has been initiated to review City Code issues such as this. The Committee recommended that staff include the enforcement of landscape conditions in the docket. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: St. Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Anthony's Parish Development report regarding the St. Anthony's Parish development agreement. Pursuant to Agreement Council's approval of the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation for St. Anthony's C _ pi-0�� Parish(VAC-00-003),the execution and recording of a development agreement was required in order to address issues presented in the July 15,2002,Planning and Development Committee report to the Council. January 6,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 9 As required, St. Anthony's has prepared drafts of the document and in coordination with the City Attorney and City staff, has arrived at a final form of the proposed agreement. The Committee has reviewed the final draft of the agreement and has determined the document appropriately addresses the issues previously identified by the Committee Therefore,the Committee recommended that the Council refer the item to staff for processing the necessary State Environmental Protection Agency(SEPA) review public hearing before the City Council, and for drafting the enacting resolution. The Committee further recommended that a public hearing date of February 10, 2003,be established. The Committee also noted that the Zerbato family, adjacent property owners, expressed special concerns during the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation public hearing on April 23,2001. The Committee therefore recommended that staff contact the Zerbato family to inform them of the draft development agreement, and report back to the Committee on the results of this discussion. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: Land Past Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Use Development Processes report regarding the City's land use development processes. The Committee discussed the various land use and building permit processes, and the length of time that permits are valid. The Committee instructed staff to prepare a table summarizing the City's permit processes,including information on the type of permit,decision-making authority,period of validity,extension process,and appeal of decisions. The table is to be updated annually for use by Council, staff, and the public. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Council: Outgoing Planning& A memo was read from former Planning and Development Committee Chair Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler thanking Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Comments(Keolker-Wheeler) Strategic Planning Department staff,City Attorney staff,Development Services staff, and fellow Committee members for their hard work and dedication in 2002. She stated that it was a pleasure to work with a team of people who have the best interests of the community in mind when making some very difficult recommendations and decisions. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 210867-211361 and three wire transfers totaling $2,676,651.77; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 41793-42205,two wire transfers and 1131 direct deposits totaling$3,384,565.28. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Past Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending Utility: Utility Fee Code concurrence in the staff recommendation that Council approve the proposed Amendments utility fee amendments to Renton Municipal Code Section 4-1-180. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 11 for ordinance.) CITY COUNCIL r Date • /-6= -?00:3 ' PLANNING AND'DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ' COMMITTEE• -REPORT January 6, 2003 St Anthony's Development Agreement ` (Referred July 15, 2002) • • Pursuant to. Council's 'approval of the Whitworth:'street vacation for •St: Anthony's Parish . (VAC=00-003); the',execution and recording .of a development agreement •was required in • order to address issues presented in the July 15,•2002 Planning and Development Committee :report to the Council., - As•required, St,-Anthony's has:prepared drafts of the document and in Coordination with the. • City Attorney and City'staff has arrived:;i t:a~,:final.:form of the _proposed .agreement., The • - Planning.and Development Comrriittee:has:reviewed tlefinal:draft'of the agreement.and has • ' - :determined • :: the'•document.appropriately addresses the;r;isSues previously identified by, the ' ,. ' Committee. . ,scr ,,,,:-= :. 'j ' Therefore,the-Cominitteesecommends-that the Council'referihe item'to staff..for.purposes of ' • . . processing the-necessary Environmental t(SEPA);;Review: publie hearing before the-City • , .'council and drafting of the.enacting`resolution The:Committee further:recom_mends that a. • . public`hearing date.of February 10, 2003:be'establrshed. ' :'' 14 . , The Committee also noted`:that%the>Zerbato farriily,`adjacent property .owners; 'expressed. special`concerns:during the pubIicy-heating `'TheCommittectherefore recommends.that:staff • - contact the. Zerbato family to inform them of the draft'developinent agreement,, and report.. • '' back to the Committee on the result(ofethis.discussion,/ - - :: .: ' ail/4 14,542/ -,..'/A)kita_4•: , : • :. . .. ' .: • .. . _ . , .... ' . ' . Kathy.K olker-Wheeler,Chair : ' e • Bride e C ng Parker;:Member • Cc: Neil Watts ••. ' • • Jennifer Henning ' Lesley Nishihira Larry Warren • • . • St.Anthony Committee Report.doc\ • Rev 01/02 bh ' 1. LLLIA az -osy Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S. November 26, 2002 DEVELOPMENT PANNING VIA U.S. MAIL GI,,, RENT- Larry Larry Warren l-. _. cal 26'07 Warren Barber & Fontes, P.S. 100 South Second Street "®`;EIVED Post Office Box 626 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: St. Anthony's Development Agreement Dear Larry: Enclosed is a revised version of the Development Agreement. Copies of this letter and the agreement also are provided to Lesley Nishihira and Julia Medzigian. It is my understanding that the Development Agreement will be provided through Ms. Medzigian to the Planning and Development Committee ("PDC") Chair for at least informational purposes and, through Ms. Nishihira, will be sent to the Environmental Review Committee ("ERC") to initiate SEPA analysis. When I last spoke to Ms. Nishihira, she presented the following options regarding the process: either (1) submit the Development Agreement to the ERC for threshold determination, followed by review and recommendation by the PDC, followed by a public hearing before the full Council, or (2) submit to the PDC for referral to staff and the ERC, and then follow the process set out above. Ms. Nishihira was to confirm the process with Ms. Medzigian at the Council. Important revisions on this version of the Agreement and remaining issues include: 1. Scope of Environmental Review. SEPA review should not be linked to specific phases of the Master Plan. We understand that staff agrees. SEPA review for this Development Agreement should be limited in recognition of the fact that the Development Agreement primarily addresses the process to effectuate a street vacation, which is categorically exempt from the threshold determination process. WAC 197-11-80O(2)(h). To the extent the Development Agreement addresses land use issues associated with the compatibility of a church, school and related facilities within the Bounded Property, those issues have been generally addressed in the City's Law Offices 1001298o2.[)OC;1 524 Second Avenue,Suite 500 nrogers@cairncross.com Seattle, Washington)98104-2323 direct:(206)254-4417 Phone:206-587-0700',Fax:206-587-2308 www.cairncross.com �� Larry Warren November 26, 2002 Page 2 Comprehensive Plan and its associated SEPA review, and under the specific terms of this Agreement will be more thoroughly addressed in subsequent project-specific permit review. 2. Scope of Vesting to the Master Plan. The Parish's 20-year master plan is an extremely conceptual document. The Parish is concerned that an attempt to limit future uses to only uses disclosed within that extremely conceptual document will result in substantial confusion. Indeed, the precise location of buildings on the site already differs under the initial CUP approval from the general 20-year Master Plan diagram. The Development Agreement requires all future phases of development to undergo subsequent detailed project-specific permit review requirements. Accordingly, we have revised the text of paragraph 5.2 to clarify that future phases of development are subject to additional permit review, that no permit level approval is granted by the Development Agreement, and to delete reference to the Master Plan diagram itself. 3. Temporary Use Permit. Language regarding applications for temporary use permits has been added in Section 3.4 as was suggested by City staff, with one clarifying sentence. I look forward to the scheduling of this matter before the City Council Planning and Development Committee and before the Environmental Review Committee. The Parish is moving forward with preparation of building permit plans, with the intent to begin development next spring. It is critical that this Development Agreement be approved expeditiously. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Nancy Bain ge Rogers NBR:ldg Enclosure cc: Lesley Nishihira Julie Medzegian {00129862.DOC;1}' CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING WHITWORTH STREET VACATION AND ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH This Development Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2002 by and between the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation ("City" or "Renton"), and St. Anthony's Parish, through The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole ("St. Anthony's"). RECITALS WHEREAS, St. Anthony's Parish first was sited and has existed in the same general location since 1905; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's now is the owner of most of the property informally described as follows and designated as the "Bounded Property": (A) multiple parcels bounded by, on the east Morris Ave. S., on the west Shattuck Ave. S., on the north the alley between South 3rd and South 4th Streets, and on the south, South 4th Street, and (B) multiple parcels currently developed with the Parish Social Hall located at South 4th Street and Morris Ave. S (the "Bounded Property"); WHEREAS, the Bounded Property lies within the Center Downtown District of Renton, generally bordered by on the east I-405, on the west Shattuck Ave. S., on the north Airport Way and the Cedar River, and on the south Houser Way. This Development Agreement applies to those portions of the "Bounded Property" owned by St. Anthony's and is intended to expand to cover any parcels within the Bounded Property that are subsequently acquired by St. Anthony's. A formal legal description of the property within the Bounded Property that is owned by St. Anthony's is attached and incorporated in full as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's has approached Renton requesting that Renton vacate a portion of Whitworth Avenue north of South 4th Street, where Whitworth bisects church property and vacate an associated alley(hereafter collectively referred to for ease as the vacation of "Whitworth"); WHEREAS, St. Anthony's is proposing a twenty-year project on the proposed church campus, to be accomplished in four phases (the "Campus Project"); WHEREAS, before proceeding with the Campus Project, St. Anthony's wishes assurance from Renton that the necessary Whitworth right-of-way will be vacated so that St. Anthony's can have a unified campus; WHEREAS, Renton wishes to keep Whitworth open for circulation as long as possible, to delay the closure of that street until such time as construction is imminent and to provide for reconveyance of title to Renton, should it vacate the right-of-way of Whitworth and St. Anthony's then not proceed with the Campus Project; {00120437.DOC;4}1 WHEREAS, St. Anthony's wishes to delay the expenditure of the street vacation fee until a point closer in time to actual initiation of construction; WHEREAS, St. Anthony's wishes to assure future development of its Renton property; WHEREAS, the Renton City Council, at its regular meeting on April 23, 2001, stated its intention of granting the requested street and alley vacation, and on July 15, 2002, the Renton City Council by unanimous vote approved entry into a form of Development Agreement incorporating the terms herein; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2002, St. Anthony's withdrew land use applications for a rectory to be located at 215 Whitworth Avenue as was requested by the City Council; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants and provisions set forth herein, the receipt and adequacy of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1.0 STREET VACATION PROCESS 1.1 Street Vacation Contingent on Permits. The Campus Project includes a major structure which occupies the current location of the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue. The administration of Renton will prepare and present an ordinance vacating the requested portions of Whitworth Avenue and the alley to the Renton City Council for reading and adoption at the first available date at the time that building permits are ready to be issued. 1.2 Payment of Compensation. Prior to the adoption of the vacation ordinance, for example, at the time the vacation ordinance is noted for presentation, St. Anthony's shall pay to the City the amount of compensation due as determined by the City Council, pursuant to state law, but in no event more than the full appraised value of the vacated property, as adjusted herein for other dedications. The appraisal process and other street vacation processes may begin as soon as this Development Agreement is executed. 1.3 Utilities. The parties agree that there are currently significant municipal utilities within the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue. As part of the street vacation ordinance, the City of Renton will retain a utility easement for those utilities, or that easement will be granted as part of St. Anthony's development application, conditional use permit, or site plan approval, as may be necessary, St. Anthony's may agree to reroute the utilities to a location that is acceptable to the City of Renton so that the operation of the utilities is not more expensive to the City of Renton, and such that the utilities function in an equivalent or better manner than those utilities in the utilities' current location. Any utilities relocated onto private property shall be within a dedicated easement in a form acceptable to the City of Renton. Any relocation, oversizing or latecomers charges are governed by the City Code or applicable requirements and not by this Development Agreement. {00120437.DOC;4}2 1.4 Reconveyance. Should the City of Renton adopt a street vacation ordinance, and St. Anthony's begins construction, but does not follow through with the construction or takes actions that would otherwise make the use of Whitworth by St. Anthony's unnecessary for the Campus Project, and abandons those projects or make no progress upon them for a period of five years after the street vacation ordinance is adopted, then St. Anthony's agrees that it will reconvey the right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue, previously vacated by Renton, back to Renton upon payment to St. Anthony's, by Renton, of a sum equal to the amount paid by St. Anthony's as a fee for the street vacation (i.e., the appraised fair market value of the property, or portion of the fair market value charged by the City for the street vacation), and St. Anthony's shall also remove any partial construction that may exist and restore the street to its previously existing condition. Provided however, that the five year progress period shall be tolled during any time period during which St. Anthony's progress on the Campus Project is impeded due to third party interference or delay, including appeals or litigation, Acts of God, or other events beyond the reasonable control of St. Anthony's. 1.5 Exchange of Right-of-Way. Subject to approval of land use application file no. LUA-02-054, and to provide for improved traffic circulation, St. Anthony's shall dedicate to Renton four feet on the south side of the alley running east and west between Shattuck and Whitworth, south of South 3rd Street, to provide an additional four feet of right-of-way, which the City represents will then provide a total 24-foot wide alley right-of-way. St. Anthony's shall further improve the alley to accommodate two lanes of traffic, by providing appropriate striping. The value of the dedication of land shall be credited square foot by square foot against the value of the alley vacation. 2.0 CONTINUING ACCESS ACROSS ST. ANTHONY'S CAMPUS. 2.1 North-South Driveway. The proposed first two phases of the Campus Project, as shown in City land use application file no. LUA-02-054, include a driveway proceeding generally north to south, along the to-be-vacated Whitworth Avenue, then west to east, then north to south along the to-be-vacated alley area between and parallel to Whitworth and Morris Avenues. The driveway location is not a public through street, but will not be gated unless deemed necessary for security purposes. The parties acknowledge and agree that later phases of the Campus Project or subsequent campus development during the term of this Agreement may cause the driveway location and alignment to change. 2.2 North-South Pedestrian corridor. The first two phases of the Campus Project, as shown in City land use application file no. LUA-02-054, include a pedestrian corridor adjoining a driveway proceeding generally north to south, along the to-be-vacated Whitworth Avenue, then west to east, then north to south again along the to-be-vacated alley area between and parallel to Whitworth and Morris Avenues. A public pedestrian access easement will be granted to the City and the City will be responsible for maintenance and repair of the sidewalk. The City of Renton agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold St. Anthony's harmless from all claims, liens, losses, liabilities, and causes of action for damages to property or personal injury resulting from actions or omissions of the City, its employees, agents, contractors, or representatives arising from the use and development of the aforementioned sidewalk. The City of Renton's indemnification obligations survive termination or expiration of any other elements of this Agreement. The {00120437.DOC;4}3 parties acknowledge and agree that later phases of the Campus Project or subsequent campus development during the term of this Agreement may cause the pedestrian corridor location and alignment to change and agree that the pedestrian access easement may be temporarily suspended during later construction and relocated. 2.3 Neighboring Access and Parking. As conditioned herein, St. Anthony's shall provide the Zerbato family with a twenty-foot wide easement coextensive with the general location of the North-South driveway described in section 2.1. St. Anthony's shall grant an easement allowing parking in 5 stalls of off street parking adjacent to the Zerbato property for the Zerbato,property's employee and customer parking, in the general location shown on Exhibit "B". This driveway and parking easement shall be extinguished if the property owner of the Zerbato parcel states in writing that the owner no longer wants such an easement or the Zerbato parcel is sold. The driveway and parking easement is contingent on the City posting signage sufficient to direct the general public to the businesses located on the Zerbato property and to St. Anthony's, while stating that the drive is not a public through street. 3.0 ADDITIONAL PROPERTY &USES 3.1 Allowed Expansion. This Development Agreement will expand to cover any property within the Bounded Property that is acquired by St. Anthony's. When additional land within the Bounded Property is acquired, the parties agree to execute an addendum to this Development Agreement to add those lands to the property description provided in Exhibit A. 3.2 Different Uses. This Development Agreement does not apply to and does not limit the ability of St. Anthony's or other affiliated organizations to acquire lands outside the Bounded Property, including lands within the City's current Center Downtown District, for other primary uses, including but not limited to residences, senior housing, low-income housing, and nursing services. 3.3 Disallowed Expansion. St. Anthony's Parish will limit its development of church, school, and social outreach uses in the current"Center Downtown District" to the Bounded Property; provided however, that St. Anthony's may hold title to additional property within the Center Downtown District, including property acquired by gift, donation or devise, so long as the Parish or Archdiocese does not seek land use entitlements for church, school, and social outreach uses for any property that is outside the Bounded Property. 3.4 Transitional Uses. As St. Anthony's Parish prepares the Bounded Property for future development, it may be necessary to situate existing or approved uses in transitional locations within the Bounded Property that were not specified under the Conditional Use Permit, City Land Use application file no. LUA-02-054, granted by the City or subsequent Conditional Use Permits. In such instances, St. Anthony's shall be required to obtain a Temporary Use Permit to confirm the specific use and location. The term of any Temporary Use Permit shall be determined by the City with reference to the time required to complete development work necessitating the relocation of the use. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to require additional land use entitlements for church-, school-, or social outreach-related uses that do not {00120437.DOC;4}4 • require construction of new, or expanded or remodeled buildings, regardless of their location within the Bounded Property. 4.0 PARKING 4.1 Increase in Number of Spaces. After completion of Phase I of the Campus Project, St. Anthony's will have approximately 230 parking spaces on its land within the Bounded Property. The parties agree that this is a significant increase from the 112 spaces currently provided on-site (this 112 total includes 15 spaces on the portion of Whiteworth Avenue to be vacated). Accordingly, the parties agree that after the completion of Phase I, the available on-site parking for the Parish will have markedly improved. 4.2 Parking Management. This agreement does not preclude the City from requesting development and implementation of a parking management plan if necessary to accommodate parking demand created by approval of future land use entitlements for new or expanded uses within the Bounded Property. 5.0 VESTING 5.1 Vested Rights for Future Development. During the term of this Development Agreement, St. Anthony's shall have the right to develop lands within the Bounded Property in accordance with the City of Renton ordinances and regulations in effect on the date of this agreement, including but not limited to, parking requirements and permit procedures, but excepting any applicable impact, mitigation and permit fees, Uniform Fire Codes, Uniform Building Codes, similar fire and building codes, and City ordinances implementing fire and building codes, or other regulations necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. 5.2 Agreement to Conceptual Plan. The City agrees that future phases of development for the Campus Project including an expanded church, a rectory with public spaces, and redevelopment of the existing school building are appropriate for the Bounded Property, but that new or expanded buildings for church, school, or social outreach uses are subject to subsequent detailed permit review. No permit level approval is granted by this Agreement. St. Anthony's agrees that, as part of a later phase of development, the school portables will be removed from the campus. The parties acknowledge and agree that the term of this Development Agreement may exceed the Parish's current 20-year plans for development, and that the Parish's plans are conceptual and, therefore, St. Anthony's may request development approvals for projects different from or in addition to the development generally described above and nothing in this Development Agreement prohibits such a request. 5.3 Optional Vesting. If a City policy, or zoning or development regulation is amended that eases development requirements within the Bounded Property, then St. Anthony's has the right to opt to apply the revised regulations to future development applications. {00120437.DOC;4}5 6.0 STRUCTURE DESIGN 6.1 Structure Design for Phase I and II of the Campus Project. Development of new buildings implementing Phase I and II of the Campus Project/20-year Master Plan that is approved for the Bounded Property under City Land Use application file no. LUA-02-054 shall be constructed with appropriate footings and foundations capable of supporting additional stories allowed under the City's codes for the primary school and assembly uses contained in those new buildings, under the parish's planned construction method. 7.0 TERM AND AMENDMENT 7.1 Effective Date and Term. This Development Agreement is effective as of the last date executed below and for twenty-five(25) years thereafter. 7.2 Termination Upon Land Transfer. This Development Agreement shall terminate as to any portions of the Bounded Property that St. Anthony's ceases to own and transfers to any entity not affiliated with St. Anthony's church, school, and social outreach services. 7.3 Amendment. This Development Agreement may be amended at any time upon mutual agreement of the parties. The parties specifically agree to meet in good faith to review the Agreement for appropriate amendments upon the tenth(loth), and twentieth (20th) anniversaries of the Agreement. In addition, if the Center Downtown zoning designation is revised to call for less intense development on the Bounded Property or other lands within the Center Downtown zone, then the parties agree to a good faith review of the Development Agreement for appropriate amendments. 8.0 AUTHORITY TO APPROVE AGREEMENT 8.1 All signing parties represent and warrant that they have taken all necessary steps to authorize such act and that execution of this Development Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 and is valid and binding for all purposes, subject only to subsequent appeals, if any, filed in accordance with RCW 36.70B.200. 9.0 GENERAL TERMS 9.1 Integration. This Development Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and no prior oral or written agreement shall be valid. 9.2 Venue and Governing Law. Venue for all disputes arising under or connected with this Development Agreement shall be in the Superior Court for King County. This Development Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with Washington law. 9.3 No Waiver of Police Power or Condemnation Authority. The City does not waive its police power or condemnation authority by entering into this Development Agreement, except as provided by RCW 36.70B.170 et seq. {00120437.DOC;4}6 9.4 Attorneys Fees. In any action arising under or related to this Development Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to be paid its reasonable attorneys fees, expenses, and costs by the non-prevailing party. 9.5 Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or portion of this Development Agreement is declared unlawful or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Development Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. {00120437.DOC;4}7 Dated this_ day of August, 2002. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole By: Its: [7d p By: Its: City of Renton By: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Attest By: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk On this day, personally appeared before me, , who is the of The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole , to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act with authorization of and on behalf of St. Anthony's Church and the Archdiocese of Seattle. Given under my hand and seal this day of August, 2002. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at My appointment expires: {00120437.DOC;4}8 On this day, personally appeared before me, , who is the of The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole , to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act with authorization of and on behalf of St. Anthony's Church and the Archdiocese of Seattle. Given under my hand and seal this day of August 2002. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at My appointment expires: Now comes the Honorable Jesse Tanner who is the Mayor of the City of Renton and states that he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act on behalf of the City of Renton. Given under my hand and seal this day of August, 2002. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at My appointment expires: {00120437.DOC;4}9 1 CIT' , . OF RENTON City Clerk Bonnie I.Walton Jesse Tarnier,Mayor October 24, 2002 Wade Cross 322 Morris Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Dated 8/6/2002 regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition Conditional Use Permit Application for 314 S. 4ch St, Renton; File No. CU-02-054 Dear Mr. Cross: At the regular Council meeting of October 21, 2002, the Renton City Council approved the recommendation of the Planning and•Development Committee to uphold the Hearing Examiner's decision granting the referenced Conditional Use Peiiiiit. A copy of the Planning and Development Committee report is enclosed for your information. Please feel free to call if further information or assistance is needed. Sincerely, 61/444/.4/. Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Toni Nelson Neil Watts,Development Services Division St. Anthony's Parish, Attn: Greg McNabb, 314 South 4th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 RENT ON �� AHEAD OF THE CURVE . - This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer October 21,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 405 Council: Initiative 790 A resolution was read stating the Renton City Council's opposition to Initiative (LEOFF Plan 2 Pension 790 which concerns Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System) System,Plan 2. Motion to adopt died for lack of a second. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler stated her reluctance to vote on the resolution regarding Initiative 790 because the details and ramifications are too confusing to make an informed decision. Councilmember Parker stated his support for the police and fire fighters and for increased representation on the pension board, but believes this particular legislation is flawed by putting the city, the state, and the employee at financial risk. Return to Appeal MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL RETURN TO THE SCHEDULED ORDER OF BUSINESS. CARRIED. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning &Development report regarding the appeal of the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Conditional Committee Use Permit(CU-02-054). The Committee convened to consider the Hearing Appeal: St. Anthony's Examiner's decision dated August 6,2002. The subject property is located at Catholic Church Conditional 314 S.4`h St., Renton,WA 98055. The applicant sought and received approval Use Permit,Wade Cross (CU- of a Conditional Use permit allowing renovation and add-on to the existing St. C 02-054) Anthony's Parish Campus. The appellant,Wade Cross, appealed the Hearing Examiner's approval of the permit. The appellant assigned three errors to the Hearing Examiner decision: 1)The record did not reflect any consideration by the Hearing Examiner of Mr. Cross' request to widen Morris Ave; 2)Loss of parking due to the project; and 3)Traffic control had not been dealt with. FINDINGS OF FACT 1) Staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit contingent on the vacation of Whitworth Ave. 2) Subject to certain conditions not on appeal,the Hearing Examiner approved the Conditional Use Permit. 3) The appellant's first issue(regarding the widening of Morris Ave) and third issue(traffic control)both fall under the general category of traffic. 4) The appellant's second issue falls under the general category of parking. 5) The record contains substantive evidence concerning the project's impact on both parking and traffic. 6) The Hearing Examiner's conclusions specifically address both the parking and traffic. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Hearing Examiner's conclusions and decision were supported by the record. The Committee found that conclusions and decision contained no error of fact or law. Therefore, the Committee concluded that the Hearing Examiner's decision should be upheld. RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee recommended that the City Council uphold the Hearing Examiner's decision granting the Conditional Use Permit. October 21,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 406 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler stated for the record that Mr. Cross expressed his apologies for his anger at a previous meeting and that she accepted his apology on behalf of the Council. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington,reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2002 and beyond. Items noted included: * Senator Margarita Prentice, from Washington's 11th Legislative District, is scheduled to hold a Senate Committee hearing Friday, October 25th,from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. One of the agenda items will be a discussion about gambling issues. * The recent city-wide survey,conducted by Elway Research,found that 63% of the respondents rate Renton as an excellent or very good place to live; 92% feel safe in Renton; 65% are satisfied with the City's efforts to keep citizens informed; 75% gave employees either an "A" or a "B" for customer service; and 69%feel their tax dollars are well spent in the City of Renton. * The Renton Domestic Violence Task Force Education Committee designed the display currently displayed on the 1st Floor of City Hall in collaboration with the City,YWCA, and King County Sexual Assault Resource Center. Outside the display case,there are figures from the Washington State Silent Witness Exhibit. These life-size silhouettes depict several of the approximately 30 women in our state who have lost their lives as a result of domestic violence. Attached to each silhouette is a shield with the details of the woman's story and information about the outcome of the case. For more information contact Human Services at 425- 430-6650. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus,Highlands Community Association(HCA)President, 1137 Citizen Comment: DeMastus- Harrington Ave. NE,Renton,98056 announced a meeting to be held Thursday, Highlands Community October 24th, at 7:00 p.m. at the Renton Housing Administration Building at Association 2900 NE 10th St., and urged the public to attend to hear King County Councilman Dwight Pelz and Renton Councilman Randy Corman speak on the I-405 Corridor transportation and construction issues. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of October 14,2002. Council concur. - October 14,2002 Appointment: Board of Mayor Tanner reappointed George Feighner, 201 Union Ave. SE, Space#92, Adjustment Renton, 98059,to Position#4 on the Board of Adjustment for a four-year term expiring 9/06/2006. Council concur. Plat: Brookridge, NE 31st St& Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the Lincoln Ave NE(FP-02-088) Brookridge Final Plat(formerly known as St. Claire); 18 single-family lots on 10.3 acres located in the vicinity of NE 31st St. and Lincoln Ave. NE(FP-02- 088). Council concur. (See page 409 for resolution.) APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Date /d`01/4 'c'Z COMMITTEE REPORT October 21, 2002 St Anthony's Catholic;:Ch urcit Addition/Renovation.Conditional`Use;.Permit A lication:: PP lx .a.- 1 , . File LUA 01 085;S ZPL I,;c 6'-'oa=os_ (Referred-September 9, 2002) The Planning &Development Committee convened to consider the appeal of the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated August 6, 2002. The subject property is located at 314.S. 4th St., Renton, WA 98055. The applicant sought and received approval of a Conditional Use permit. The permit will allow the applicant to renovate and add-on to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The appellant, Wade Cross;is appealing the Hearing Examirier''s approval of the permit. The appellant assigns three errors to the Hearing Examiner decision: 1) The record does not reflect any consideration by'the'Hearing Examiner of Mr. Cross' request to widen Morris Ave; 2) Loss of parking due-to the project;.and 3) Traffic control was not dealt with. FINDINGS OF FACT, 1) Staff recommended approval,of the,.Conditional Use Permit contingent on the vacation of Whitworth Ave. 2) Subject to certain conditions'not.on appeal, the Hearing Examiner approved the Conditional Use Permit. 3) The appellant's first issue(regarding the widening of Morris Ave) and third issue(traffic control)both fall under the general category of traffic. 4) The appellant's second issue falls under the general category of parking. 5) The record contains substantive evidence concerning the project's impact on both parking and traffic. 6) The Hearing Examiner's conclusions specifically address both the parking and traffic. SEE Hearing Examiner's CONCLUSIONS 1. (e) & (F). ce n tacitt, , Planning and Development Committee Report Page 2 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Hearing Examiner's conclusions and decision are supported by the record. The Committee finds that conclusions and decision contain no error of fact or law. Therefore, the Committee concludes that the Hearing Examiner's decision should be upheld. RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee recommends that the City Council uphold the Hearing Examiner's decision granting the Conditional Use Permit. /7.,PA ,- 1/3 ka- ' '' ' // ( T 4-Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Chair • ri-� e i e Chain r- ng ar er,Member ' I I October 117,2002 Lesley lishihira, Senior Planner 'City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way ''Renton,WA 98055 RE: Insert to minutes of the St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation Hearing File No.LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Dear Lesley: 'The following is a summary from the hearing minutes regarding Mr. Cross' request to widen Morris Avenue, followed by staffs response: IMr. Cross in his testimony stated that he lives on Mon-is Avenue. At this time a garbage truck and a fire engine could not pass each other on Morris Avenue. This is where much of the St. lAnthony's traffic will go even if it is not shuffled out onto Morris Avenue. He feels that a 'mitigation measure should be imposed that at the very least states that the street needs to be 'widened in the direction of St.Anthony's because they own most of that side of the street and it is jbenefitirig them. Ms.Kittrick stated that Morris Avenue has always been a residential street and has been 'designated as a residential street. Never has the Transportation Division in any discussions offered or decided that it would be necessary to widen Morris Avenue. 'If you have any questions,please call me at(425)430-6515. "Sincerely, !Kelly Williams Hearing'Examiner Secretary cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner I I tqc CITX -CIF RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor! Fred J.Kaufman October 17, 2002 Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Insert to minutes of the St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation Hearing File No.LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Dear Lesley: The following is a summary from the hearing minutes regarding Mr. Cross' request to widen Morris Avenue,followed by staff's response: Mr. Cross in his testimony stated that he lives on Morris Avenue. At this time a garbage truck and a fire engine could not pass each other on Morris Avenue. This is where much of the St. Anthony's traffic will go even if it is not shuffled out onto Morris Avenue. He feels that a mitigation measure should be imposed that at the very least states that the street needs to be widened in the direction of St.Anthony's because they own most of that side of the street and it is benefiting lithem. Ms.Kittrick stated that Morris Avenue has always been a residential street and has been designated as a residential street. Never has the Transportation Division in any discussions offered or decided that it would be necessary to widen Morris Avenue. If you have any questions,please call me at(425)430-6515. Sincerely, fip • , upasiantss Kelly William' Hearing Examiner Secretary cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner i I 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6515 RENTON COAHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer c: CIT`_ OF RENTON - . Renton City Council Jesse Tanner,Mayor CITY OF RENTON October 8, 2002 OCT ' 4 2002 APPEAL FILED BY: Wade D. Cross RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition Conditional Use Application for 314 S. 4th St., File NoW/a0270'554DUEI ECF, AAD To Interested Parties: The Renton City Council's Planning&Development Committee will meet to review the above- referenced item on the following date(s): Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:00 p.m. 7th Floor/Council Chambers City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 This Council Committee meeting is open to the public, but it is not a public hearing. It is a working session of the Planning &Development Committee. No new testimony or evidence will be taken. However, the parties are expected to attend and be prepared to explain why the Council Committee should uphold or overturn the decision of the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions regarding these meetings,please phone Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison, at 425-430-6501. Sincerely, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Chair Planning &Development Committee Renton City Council { 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6501 RENTON 3 4 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD, OF THE CURVE September 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 343 Separate Consideration City Clerk reported bid opening on 9/04/2002 for CAG-02-148,Highlands Park Item 6.i. Irrigation; five bids; engineer's estimate$65,000; and submitted staff CAG: 02-148,Highlands Park recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Mr.Irrigation,in the Irrigation,Mr Irrigation amount of$58,580.80.* In response to Councilman Clawson's request for more information about the project,Community Services Administrator Jim Shepherd explained that the purpose of the project is to replace an old irrigation system at Highlands Park located at 800 Edmonds Ave. NE. Separate Consideration Court Case filed in King County Small Claims Court by Intraspect Group, Item 6.i. 12819 SE 38th St., Suite 65,Bellevue, 98006,alleging that the City of Renton Court Case: Intraspect Group, owes for garbage service charges in the amount of$1,644.80.* CRT-02-009 Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler commented that the City needs to move quickly on this item because of the proposed closure of the Renton District Court. Separate Consideration Human Resources &Risk Management Department recommended approval to Items 6.o. & 6.p. reorganize and adjust the salaries for the following job classifications within Human Resources: the Community Services Department: Facilities Director, grade m37 to m38, Community Services Dept $616;Parks Director,m37 to m38, $616; Recreation Director,m37 to m38, Positions Reclassifications $616;Library Director, m37 to m38, $616; and Human Services Manager,m26 to m28, $962.50.* Human Resources: Municipal Human Resources &Risk Management Department requested approval to Court Judge Position increase the salary of the Municipal Court Judge position and place the position Reclassification to Grade e10 at salary grade e10. Funds for the salary adjustment in the amount of$1,424.50 for 2002 are available in the current budget.* Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that the agenda bills were missing some attachments. Noting that the items are being referred to the Finance Committee,Mr.Tanner stated that staff would provide the attachments to Council. *MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 6.h.AND 6.i.,REFER CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 6.j.TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND INSURANCE SERVICES,AND REFER CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 6.o.AND 6.p.TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Dennis &Mer Lyn Fife, 912 Redmond Ave.NE, Citizen Comment: Various— Renton,98056;Wayne&Lillian Gores,3735 NE 10th Lane,Renton, 98056; Kiwanis Park NE 9th St and Harold Buoy, 872 Redmond Ave.NE,Renton, 98056;who own property Entrance,Park Patron bordering the NE 9th St. entrance to Kiwanis Park and complain of illegal Problems parking of vehicles and property damage. The property owners request that the City's Police and Parks Departments continue to monitor and maintain the area, including trimming the bushes and shrubbery which could provide cover for assailants. Added A letter was read from Nancy Bainbridge Rogers, attorney with Cairncross & Citizen Comment: Rogers -St. Hempelmann,P.S., 524 2nd Ave., Suite 500,Seattle, 98104,regarding the Anthony Catholic Church Conditional Use Permit for the St. Anthony Parish renovation and addition, Conditional Use Permit asking that Council affirm the Hearing Examiner's decision approving the Appeal,Wade Cross (CU-02- project and deny Mr. Cross's appeal. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, 054) SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. September 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 344 In response to Mayor Tanner's inquiry,Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes explained that the letter is a brief in response to the appeal and not additional evidence. OLD BUSINESS Council President Nelson announced that the Farmers Market has concluded for Community Services: Farmers the year, and she thanked citizens for attending and the vendors for Market participating. She also expressed her appreciation for the Council's support of the market and the assistance of City staff, saying that the market was very successful. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler praised Ms. Nelson for all of her work on the Farmers Market. Legal: Dangerous Dog Councilman Clawson stated that the committee report and related ordinance Regulations concerning the dangerous dog regulations will be presented at the next Council meeting. Citizen Comment: Pier Councilman Corman reported receipt of a letter from Stephanie Pier of The (American Kennel Club)— American Kennel Club, 5580 Centerview Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27606,regarding Dangerous Dog Regulations the proposed dangerous dog regulations ordinance, and requesting that the ordinance refrain from singling out specific breeds of dogs. Councilwoman Briere stated that the proposed ordinance is not breed specific. Councilman Clawson pointed out that Renton already has a dangerous dog ordinance in place, and explained that the purpose of the proposed ordinance is to comply with a recent change in State law concerning the definition and procedures related to dangerous dogs. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB LETTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Planning &Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee report regarding the density bonus in the Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM- Planning: Residential Multi- U)zone,north of S. 2nd St. The Committee reviewed the issue paper entitled Family Urban Zone, Density Density Bonuses in the RM-U Zone and the proposed amendments to Title IV . Bonus (Development Regulations). The proposal allows a density bonus of up to 25 additional dwelling units per acre within the RM-U zone north of S. 2nd St. dependent upon compliance with certain additional design guidelines currently existing within City Code,RMC 4-3-100, as optional guidelines. The Committee recommended referring this issue to the City Attorney's office for preparation of an ordinance and setting of a public hearing on the draft ordinance for September 23,2002. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Planning& Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Development Committee 2002 report regarding the Planning&Development Committee 2002 referral list. Referral List The Committee met on August 15, 2002, to review and take action on items pending in Committee. 1. Item#920: "Periodic review of residential policies and implementation" is changed to "Periodic review of land use policies and implementation issues" and retained as an ongoing item in Committee. 2. Item#1278: "Conditional use permits for churches and day care centers" is referred to the annual Title IV docket. 1._.; k7eve„ P 94 eerka-pt&te-f- Cairncross e'r Hempelmann, P.S. • CITY OF RENT+ qM& SEP 0,2002 REV September 5, 2002 CITY CLERKS OFFICE VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S.MAIL Renton City Council 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Response of St. Anthony's Parish to Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Approving a Conditional Use Permit for St. Anthony's Parish Renovation and Addition. • City File Nos. LUA 02-054, ECF, CU-H • Dear City Councilmembers: This firm represents the Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle and the St. Anthony Parish (referred to herein as St. Anthony's), the applicant for the above-referenced project. St. Anthony's asks that the Council deny the appeal of Wade Cross and affirm the Report and Decision of the Hearing Examiner. A. INTRODUCTION The Hearing Examiner conducted a thorough review of the St. Anthony's Parish Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") application, and St. Anthony's urges the Council to sustain the Examiner's decision. St. Anthony's has prepared a 20-year conceptual master plan for renovation and expansion of its church and school facilities in the City. The CUP now before the Council covers the first 10 years and two phases of that plan and is intended to accommodate existing parishioners and school students by renovating and expanding current facilities to meet current needs. As the Council is aware, St. Anthony's Parish has pursued its renovation and addition plans for over two years. During that time, first as a good neighbor and then also in response to Law Offices 524 Second Avenue,Suite 500 {00123341.r)oc:I Seattle,Washington 98104-2323 nrogers@cairncross.com (206)254-4417 Phone:206-587-0700•Fax:206-587-2308 www.cairncross.comI co Renton City Council September 5, 2002 Page 2 specific Council requests, the Parish reached out to surrounding neighbors, including Mr. Cross. The Parish sought comments on project plans, and organized three public meetings to review the plans and discuss them with the Parish Building Committee and with the project architects. St. Anthony's revised its plans several times to accommodate the concerns of neighbors and City staff. The CUP application currently before the Council relies on the vacation of Whitworth Avenue. As you know, the street vacation is a decision separate and distinct from the CUP process. The Council approved the street vacation subject to entry into a Development Agreement, the terms of which were set forth in a report from the Planning and Development Committee. As of the date of this letter, the final details of that Development Agreement were being worked out with the City Attorney's office. B. RESPONSE TO APPEAL OF WADE CROSS Mr. Cross did not appeal the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA")Mitigated Determination of Non-significance ("MDNS") to the Hearing Examiner. Therefore,he is precluded from raising SEPA issues in this appeal and no SEPA issues can be reviewed or decided by the Council. Mr. Cross's appeal alleges three errors in the Examiner's decision, but does not reference any specific sections of the Examiner's decision. In addition, none of Mr. Cross's appeal issues are directed at any specific CUP approval criterion. For those reasons alone,his appeal should be dismissed. However, in the event the Council decides to consider the issues raised by Mr. Cross, we set out below the Parish's response. 1. The evidence in the record does not warrant widening of Morris Avenue. Mr. Cross states that he asked for Morris Avenue to be widened to mitigate for increased traffic. Mr. Cross states that the record shows no consideration of his request. Mr. Cross is correct that during his testimony at the CUP hearing, he requested that Morris Avenue be widened. Mr. Cross is incorrect that the record shows no consideration of his request. In fact, after Mr. Cross testified, Ms. Kayren Kittrick of Development Services testified that Morris Avenue is not considered to be a major access route, and that the City's transportation staff did not support widening Morris. The Examiner's Report and Decision includes minutes of the testimony given, but does not reflect these comments. See Report and Decision, p. 7. However, the minutes of the Examiner's Report and Decision are not the legal record in this matter; instead the legal record is the complete testimony recorded on tape, together with all written exhibits. See Report and Decision,p. 1. Accordingly, the record does reflect that consideration was given to Mr. Cross's request to widen Morris Avenue. {00123341.DOC;1} Renton City Council September 5, 2002 Page 3 Mr. Cross did not establish himself as an expert on traffic related issues. In contrast, the applicant provided detailed expert reports regarding traffic impacts of the proposed project. These expert reports did not conclude that widening of Morris was necessary. See Record, Ex. 1 (original application with Traffic Studies), Ex. 18 (Resume of R. Herman), and Ex. 20 (Traffic Addendum). Without expert evidence, and in the face of both the City's and applicant's professional testimony that Morris Avenue need not be widened, Mr. Cross's request for modification of the decision must be rejected. We also note that while Mr. Cross seeks to have a condition requiring widening of Morris added to the CUP decision,mitigation for traffic impacts is typically addressed during the SEPA process. Mr. Cross did not appeal the City's SEPA MDNS for the renovation and expansion. His failure to appeal the MDNS mitigation measures means that the MDNS conditions are not before the Council and cannot be modified at this time. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require widening of Morris Avenue must be rejected, first,because the record reflects consideration of his request, second, because there is no expert evidence that supports the widening of Morris Avenue, and, third, because the relief sought should have been sought in a SEPA appeal which was not brought. 2. The evidence establishes that St. Anthony's renovation and expansion significantly improves the parking available in the area. Next,Mr. Cross alleges a net loss of public parking, and calls for parking to be shared with neighboring businesses. We presume Mr. Cross refers to the 15 parking spaces that exist along the portion of Whitworth Avenue that will be vacated and that he asks for St. Anthony's parking lot to be shared with neighboring businesses. Any loss in public parking along Whitworth Avenue, and any mitigation associated with that loss is a,subject addressed by the Council's determination to approve the vacation of Whitworth Avenue and is not a proper subject for appeal of the CUP. However, for the Council's information, we note that part of the street vacation Development Agreement negotiation includes discussion of the offer of some parking spaces for use by area businesses. As a practical matter, we also note that the church parking areas are generally open to the public during the business day. Finally, we ask the Council to consider that approval of the CUP application allows the Parish to increase its current parking supply from 112 spaces (which, for comparison purposes, includes the 15 spaces along Whitworth) to 225 spaces. This doubling of the available'parking stalls results in a significant improvement to the area parking conditions. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require shared parking with neighboring businesses must be rejected because the issue is not part of the CUP approval but, {00123341.DOC;1}I it Renton City Council September 5, 2002 Page 4 rather, is part of the Council's approval of the street vacation. Moreover, the St. Anthony's renovation project significantly improves the number of parking spaces available in the vicinity. 3. The evidence in the record establishes that crosswalks and necessary lighting are provided between the planned parking lot on the current social hall site and the church building. Mr. Cross asks that crosswalks and lights be installed between the parking lot on the former social hall site and the church building. He asserts that no crosswalks were noted. Mr. Cross did not raise this issue before the Examiner, which means that there is no record supporting his claim. For that reason alone, this claim should be rejected. Mr. Cross's claim also should be rejected because, in fact, crosswalks and lighting are already provided at the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue. The project application plan sheets,which are part of Exhibit 1, include a three-sheet ALTA/Topographic survey of the site. Both sheets 2 and 3 of the survey show that crosswalks already exist along the north, east, and south legs of the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue South, the intersection that parishioners will need to cross to reach the church building from the new parking lot in the social hall site. Those survey sheets also note the location of street lights, demonstrating that there already is a street light at the southeast corner of the intersection. The parish is not opposed to a condition requiring a fourth crosswalk to be painted along the west leg of the intersection, if that is the Council's desire. There is already sufficient street lighting and the Parish opposes any attempt to add more street lighting. To the extent that Mr. Cross's appeal seeks to add traffic signal lights rather than street lighting at the intersection of South Fourth and Morris Avenue, the Parish opposes any such condition. None of the Parish traffic studies or City review of those studies reached a conclusion that a traffic signal was warranted at that intersection. Mr. Cross presented no evidence in support of a warrant for a traffic signal and, therefore, his request is not supported by the record and must be rejected. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require crosswalks and lights at the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue South must be rejected. First, he did not raise this issue before the Examiner, second, there already are crosswalks and street lighting at the intersection, and, third, to the extent Cross seeks a traffic signal, no evidence in the record establishes that a traffic signal is warranted. // // {00123341.DOC;1} Renton City Council September 5, 2002 Page 5 C. CONCLUSION St. Anthony's Parish respectfully requests that the Council deny Mr. Cross's appeal and affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Very truly yours .1(jo,iA 6; Nancy Bainbridge Rogers NBR:ldg cc: Greg McNabb Ed Foster Larry Warren {00123341.DOC;1 0 CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 2002 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President and Members, Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Tanner FROM: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk/Cable Manager, x6502 SUBJECT: Appeals to City Council/Opportunity to Provide Comments For your information: Per City Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of a notice of appeal to City Council, the City Clerk notifies all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. The parties of record may then, within 10 days of the date of mailing of the Clerk's notification letter, submit letters in support of their positions. For the St. Anthony's Parish conditional use permit appeal, item 6.d. on the September 9th agenda, the City Clerk's notification letter was mailed on August 26th and the deadline for submission of response letters was September 5th Cairncross &Hemplemann faxed their response letter to my office on September 5th. The hard copy of their letter, which was received Monday, Sept. 9th, was used for inclusion in your red folders as added correspondence,however. I am attaching copy of the fax received from Cairncross &Hemplemann to confirm that the correspondence from them, as allowed by City Code, was received within deadline. If I can answer any questions on this, please feel free to contact me. bw Attachment (1) cc: Jay Covington Zanetta Fontes 09/05/2002 15:58 FAX 1 206 587 2308 CAIRNCROSS 1 ]001 Cairncross Hempeln anii, P.S. CITY OF RENTON SEP 0 5 2002 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CONFIDENTIAL FACSIMILE September 5, 2002 To: City Council ATTN: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Facsimile: (425)430-6523 Telephone: (425)430-6502 • From: Nancy Bainbridge Rogers Number of pages, including this cover: 6 Please call Lisa Glavin at(206) 587-0700 if you do not receive all pages. • Re: Cross's Appeal of St. Anthony's CUP File No.: 2047-2 Remarks: Following is St. Anthony's response to Wade Cross's appeal of decision approving a Conditional Use Permit. Hard copy to follow by mail. Confidentiality Notice: This facsimile communication is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addres;ed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this cover page is not the addressee, or the employee or agent of the addressee, please be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this • communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this facsimile in error, please notify us immediately by telephone,and mail this facsimile to us at the address below. Thank you. (00123356.DOC;r) Law Offices ' 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 • Seattle, Washington 98104-2323 Phone: 206-5 77-0700 • Fax: 206-587-2308 09/05/2002 15:58 FAA 1 ZIA 587 L$U8 UA1K1Nct U55 Ljuuz • Cairncross &Hempelmann, PS. • September 5, 2002 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL • Renton City Council 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Response of St. Anthony's Parish to Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Approving a Conditional Use Permit for St. Anthony's Parish Renovation and • Addition. City File Nos. LUA 02-054, ECF, CU-H Dear, City Councilmembers: Thisi fine represents the Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle and the St. Anthony Parish (referred to herein as St.Anthony's),the applicant for the above-referenced project. St. • Anthony's asks that the Council deny the appeal of Wade Cross and affinn the Report and Decision of the Hearing Examiner. • A. INTRODUCTION The Hearing Examiner conducted a thorough review of the St. Anthony's Parish Conditional'Use Permit("CUP") application, and St. Anthony's urges the Council to sustain the Examiner's decision. St. Anthony's has prepared a 20-year conceptual master plan for renovation and expansion of its church and school facilities in the City. The CUP now before the Council covers the first 10 years and two phases of that plan and is intended to accommodate existing parishioners and school students by renovating and expanding current facilities to meet current needs. • ° As the Council is aware, St. Anthony's Parish has pursued its renovation and addition • plans for over two years. During that time, first as a good neighbor and then also in response to • La.Of ces 52•'Second gvcnuie,Suite 500 '00I23:ic4 .DOC:I Sec tde, Washington 98104-2323 nropr @leairn,,ross.con; (206)254-9417 Phone:206-5H7-0I 00.Fax.206-587-2308 WH W.CaiftICJOSS,COtn 0 09/05/2002 15:58 FAX 1 206 587 2308 CAIRNCROSS 4003 Renton City Council September 5,2002 Page 2 specific Council requests,the Parish reached out to surrounding neighbors, including Mr. Cross. The Parish sought comments on project plans, and organized three public meetings to review the plans and discuss them with the Parish Building Committee and with the project architects. St. Anthony's revised its plans several times to accommodate the concerns of neighbors and City staff. The CUP application currently before the Council relies on the vacation of Whitworth Avenue. As you know,the street vacation is a decision separate and distinct from the CUP process. The Council approved the street vacation subject to entry into a Development Agreement,the terms of which were set forth in a report from the Planning and Development Committee. As of the date of this letter, the final details of that Development Agreement were being worked out with the City Attomey's office. B. RESPONSE TO APPEAL OF WADE CROSS Mr. Cross did not appeal the State Environmental Policy Act("SEPA") Mitigated Determination of Non-significance("MDNS")to the Hearing Examiner. Therefore, he is precluded from raising SEPA issues in this appeal and no SEPA issues can be reviewed or decided by the Council. Mr. Cross's appeal alleges three errors in the Examiner's decision,but does not reference ally specific sections of the Examiner's decision. In addition, none of Mr. Cross's appeal issues are directed at any specific CUP approval criterion. For those reasons alone, his appeal should be dismissed. However, in the event the Council decides to consider the issues raised by Mr. Cross, we set out below the Parish's response. 1. The evidence in the record does not warrant widening of Morris Avenue. Mr. Cross states that he asked for Morris Avenue to be widened to mitigate for increased traffic. Mr. Cross states that the record shows no consideration of his request. Mr. Cross is correct that during his testimony at the CUP hearing, he requested that Morris Avenue be widened. Mr. Cross is incorrect that the record shows no consideration of his request. In fact, after Mr. Cross testified,Ms. Kayren Kittrick of Development Services testified that Morris Avenue is not considered to be a major access route, and that the City's transportation staff did not support widening Morris. The Examiner's Report and Decision includes minutes of the testimony given,but does not reflect these comments. See Report and Decision,p. 7. However, the minutes of the Examiner's Report and.Decision are not the legal record in this matter; instead the legal record is the complete testimony recorded on tape, together with all written exhibits. See Report and Decision, p. 1. Accordingly, the record does reflect that consideration was given to Mr. Cross's request to widen Morris Avenue. I1 (0('123341.AOC;11 09/05/2002 15:59 FAX 1 206 587 2308 CAIRNCROSS 12004 Renton City Council September 5,2002 Page 3 III Mr. Cross did not establish himself as an expert on traffic related issues. In contrast., the applicant provided detailed expert reports regarding traffic impacts of the proposed project. These expert reports did not conclude that widening of Morris was necessary. See Record, Ex. 1 (original application with Traffic Studies),Ex. 18 (Resume of R. Herman), and Ex. 20 (Traffic Addendum)! Without expert evidence, and in the face of both the City's and applicant's professional testimony that Morris Avenue need not be widened, Mr. Cross's request for modification of the decision must be rejected. We also note that while Mr. Cross seeks to have a condition requiring widening of Morris added to the CUP decision, mitigation for traffic impacts is typically addressed during the SEPA process. Mr,. Cross did not appeal the City's SEPA MDNS for the renovation and expansion. His failure tb appeal the MDNS mitigation measures means that the MDNS conditions are not before the Council and cannot be modified at this time. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require widening of Morris Avenue must'be rejected, first,because the record reflects consideration of his request, second, because there is no expert evidence that supports the widening of Morris Avenue, and,third, because the relief sought should have been sought in a SEPA appeal which was not brought. 2. The evidence establishes that St.Anthony's renovation and expansion significantly improves the parking available in the area. Next,Mr. Cross alleges a net loss of public parking, and calls for parking to be shared with neighboring businesses. We presume Mr. Cross refers to the 15 parking spaces that exist along the portion of Whitworth Avenue that will be vacated and that he asks for St. Anthony's parking lot to be shared with neighboring businesses. Any loss in public parking along Whitworth Avenue, and any mitigation associated with that loss is a subject addressed by the Council's determination to approve the vacation of Whitworth Avenue and is not a proper subject for appeal of the CUP. However, for the Council's information, we note that part of the street vacation Development Agreement negotiation includes discussion of the offer of some parking spaces for use by area businesses. As a practical matter, we also note that the church parking areas are generally open to the public during the business day. Finally, we ask the Council to consider that approval of the CUP application allows the Parish to increase its current parking supply from 112 spaces (which, for comparison purposes, includes the 15 spaces along Whitworth)to 225 spaces. This doubling of the available parking stalls results in a significant improvement to the area parking conditions. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require shared parking with neighboring businesses must be rejected because the issue is not part of the CUP approval but, (OU 123341.D0C;1) 09/05/2002 15:59 FAX 1 206 587 2308 CAIRNCROSS 12005 Renton City.Council September 5, 2002 Page 4 rather, is part of the Council's approval of the street vacation. Moreover,the St. Anthony's renovation project significantly improves the number of parking spaces available in the vicinity. 3. The evidence in the record establishes that crosswalks and necessary lighting are provided between the planned parking lot on the current social hall site and the church building. Mr. Cross asks that crosswalks and lights be installed between the parking lot on tilt; former social hall site and the church building. He asserts that no crosswalks were noted. Mr. Cross did not raise this issue before the Examiner,which means that there is no record supporting his claim. For that reason alone,this claim should be rejected. Mr. Cross's claim also should be rejected because, in fact, crosswalks and lighting are already provided at the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue. The proj ec: application Plan sheets, which are part of Exhibit 1,include a three-sheet ALTA/Topographic survey of the site. Both sheets 2 and 3 of the survey show that crosswalks already exist along the north, east, and south legs of the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue South, the intersection that parishioners will need to cross to reach the church building from the new parking lot in the social hall site. Those survey sheets also note the location of street lights.. demonstrating that there already is a street light at the southeast corner of the intersection. . The parish is not opposed to a condition requiring a fourth crosswalk to be painted along the west leg of the intersection, if that is the Council's desire. There is already sufficient street lighting and the Parish opposes any attempt to add more street lighting. To the extent that Mr. Cross's appeal seeks to add traffic signal lights rather than street lighting at the intersection of South Fourth and Morris Avenue, the Parish opposes any such condition. None of the Parish • traffic studies or City review of those studies reached a conclusion that a traffic signal was warranted atlthat intersection. Mr. Cross presented no evidence in support of a warrant for a traffic signal',and, therefore,his request is not supported by the record and must be rejected. Mr. Cross's request to modify the Examiner's Decision to require crosswalks and lights at the intersection of South Fourth Street and Morris Avenue South must be rejected. First,he did not raise this issue before the Examiner, second,there already are crosswalks and street lighting at the intersection, and,third,to the extent Cross seeks a traffic signal, no evidence in the record establishes that a traffic signal is warranted. // // // {00123341,DOC;1I} 09/05/2002 16:00 FAX 1 206 587 2308 CAIRNCROSS ig1uuti Renton City Council September 5, 2002 Page 5 • C. CONCLUSION • St. Anthony's Parish respectfully requests that the Council deny Mr. Cross's appeal and • affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner. • Very truly yours z/6G 1:A/: Nancy Bainbridge Rogers NBR:ldg cc: Greg'McNabb Ed Foster Larry Warren • • 100123341.DOC;1 September 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes' r, • •.Page 341. , • * Sound Transit and the City of Renton have negotiated and signed an agreement under which the City will provide an easement on a small strip of vacant land to Sound Transit for$30,000. The settlement agreement includes commitments by Sound Transit to work with Renton toward completing transit-related projects in the Renton area,including the N. 8th St.Direct Access Ramp and HOV improvements to key arterial corridors such as Rainier Ave. and the Strander Blvd./SW 27th St. corridor. As a show of good faith toward approving the settlement agreement,the City gave Sound Transit immediate access to the land,enabling crews to begin working on improvements immediately. Approval of the agreement formally ends Sound Transit's condemnation action against the City. * The Fall Recreation Guide entitled What's Happening is now available at the Community Center and Renton Libraries. * Growers representing the Yakima Valley and other Central Washington farming areas will bring their fresh fruit and vegetables to Renton for a' harvest sale on Saturdays through September 28th from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Piazza,Renton's downtown park. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton,98056,thanked Citizen Comment: DeMastus— Councilmembers for attending the Highlands Community Association Highlands Community neighborhood picnic,and reported that the neighborhood signs will soon be Association,Duwamish Tribe erected. On another subject,Ms. DeMastus reported that she attended the Support 150th anniversary of Chief Seattle's landing in Seattle with the Duwamish Tribe. She noted that the Duwamish Tribe is raising funds for a longhouse and cultural center,and asked the City to contribute towards this effort. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilmembers, items 6.h., 6.i.,6.j.,6.o.,and 6.p. were removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of August 19, 2002. Council concur. August 19, 2002 Appointment: Park Board Mayor Tanner reappointed Cynthia Burns,2007 NE 12th St.,Renton,98056, and Michael G. O'Donin,423 Pelly Ave.N.,Renton,98055,each to the Park Board for a'four-year term expiring 10/01/2006. Council concur. Appointment:Planning Mayor Tanner appointed Jerrilynn Hadley, 1425 Lincoln Ave.NE,Renton, Commission 08056,to the Planning Commission to fill the unexpired term of Beverly Franklin,who has resigned(term to expire 1/31/2004). Refer to Community Services Committee. Appeal: St. Anthony Catholic City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision approving the St. Church Conditional Use Anthony's Catholic Church renovation and addition Conditional Use Permit at Permit,Wade Cross(CU-02- 314 S.4th St. (CU-02-054); appeal filed by Wade D. Cross on 8/20/2002, 054) accompanied by required fee. Refer to Planning&Development Committee. (See page 343 for related correspondence.) CAG: 02-119,Gene Coulon City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/13/2002 for CAG-02-119,Gene Coulon Park Play Area Improvements, Memorial Beach Park Play Area Improvements; six bids; engineer's estimate Clements Brothers $144,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Clements Brothers,Inc., in the amount of$102,860.61. Council concur. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: •Gd � Submitting Data: AILS Dept./City Clerk For Agenda of: 9/9/2002 Dept/Div/Board.. Bonnie I. Walton Staff Contact Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 Regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition at 314 S. 4th St. File No.: LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF, AAD Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Sessions Information B. Appeal (8/20/2002) C. Hearing Examiner's Report &Decision (8/6/2002) Recommended Action: 1 Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Wade D. Cross, accompanied by required$75.00 fee received 8/20/2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: C:\Documents and Settings\rcornijo\Local Settings\Temp\AGENDA L.DOC/ CITY DF RENTON City Clerk J e Tanner,Mayor Bonnie I.Walton August 26, 2002 APPEAL FILED BY: Wade D. Cross RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition Conditional Use Application for 314 S. 4th St. (File No. LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF, AAD) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition conditional use application for the above-referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is September 5tf1, 2002. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN'that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify all parties of'record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If-you.are not listed in the local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council secretary at 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton.Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing,can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have.been available. at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at (425) 430-6502. • Sincerely, eo-itAtti v ‘dalto--74-) Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Attachments cc: Council Secretary 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 RENTON ��, This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE APPEAL - HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATIONYICFMNTON CITY COUNCIL. r N FILE NO. O` QS2 - i ECFr AUG 2 0 NO2 ..;� �r,,� APPLICATION NAME: WJ ade Cr®SS RECE1VEu The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the de6i �or of S OFFICE recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated T 6 r r - UJ 4- V` 20 O -Z . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name: Wad e• 0 • C rD s S Name: Address:3 2_ 2 M O c"r\S A 0, Address: B erJ+6 is LJ R gQoS Telephone No. Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please des ate number as denoted in the Examiner's repfrt) No. Error: i' Neff? ', So �c IL �. ,, +41 (rv1)4`5 e - r ' e 1 c 1,-d 511,4%/5 f110 ‘,, ! fir rQ c')-P ' s` j� 1 Correction:/ `- . .iT Hj A 5' €GZ/�i.5 -i I,i�l,�..( . b e °f` �p..l,4 i l 6,) - '� I'! /v L n�t� b.)t o Men�� 1 M.�' a c A e ;.>c rcr s 4\[c CONCLUSIONS: J� 1l� /., -s.No. ' Error n -e `7 (fle ° © (\ 7.4/.) / �1/` - &r-ki.+)5' Correction:kik/0/ e)t(/ /e .544tre i AY1A Al +T rJ4iN h a S&..NesseCI OTHER J f�/ No. Error: �/`Cf 1 W Aq__ ea r i s S Aid Gl,�°)-/—w (•? � ) I l _ra 1 , 0., , - E 3-oc `a ! )1cel( are. e-F -i Correction: Q y ' I' 4 .5 Cij/' " 7 -4-'o 1' # l C� 2iyi, s -aU/"� Cam f2v l-"e 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: XModify the decision or recommendation as follows: (.0ided 6+'1dr//"r Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other 4/ '' ' 692 )-------- og(ze 7a-2--- ellant/Represein ative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific appeal procedures. heappeal.doc/forms City of Renton Municipal Code;Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 -Appeals 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170,the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or other body, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen(14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9- 13-82, Amd. Ord. 4899, 3-19-2001) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council -Procedures: (See above for Time for Appeal) 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents,including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony,it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1- 25-93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record, the Council,determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive,unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) August 6, 2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish 314 South 4th Street Renton,WA 98055 St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H LOCATION: 314 South 4th Street(parish)&215 Whitworth Avenue South (rectory) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is proposing to renovate and add-on to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on July 9, 2002. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the July 16, 2002 hearing. • The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 at 9:03 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Overall Campus Plan application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: 'Vicinity Map Exhibit No. 4: Main Campus Site Plan Exhibit No. 5: SE Parking &Rectory Site Plan Exhibit No. 6: Main Floor Plan Exhibit No.7: Upper Floor Plan Exhibit No. 8: Building Elevations Exhibit No. 9: Rectory Floor Plan&Elevations Exhibit No. 10a, b, & c: Landscape Plans Exhibit No. 11: Zoning Plan Exhibit No. 12: Street Vacation Approval St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 2 Exhibit No. 13: Downtown Core Area Exhibit No. 14: Hearing Brief Exhibit No. 15: Rutledge Resume Exhibit No. 16: Master Plan, Phase Outlined in Color Exhibit No. 17: Pedestrian Linkage Exhibit No. 18: Herman Resume Exhibit No. 19a: Existing Graphic of Site Exhibit No. 19b: Graphic—Proposed Traffic Solutions Exhibit No. 20: Traffic Addendum Exhibit No.21: Circle Around Church Indicating Parking Areas The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD) and is surrounded by similarly zoned properties,however some of those are existing single- family residential uses that are now grandfathered in. There are also some commercial businesses within former residential structures as well as new structures. The central area is the main parish campus and includes the church, proposed social hall and school functions and is generally bounded on the west by Shattuck Avenue, on the east by Morris Avenue, on the south side by South 4th Street and on the north side there is a alley that runs east-west south of South 3rd Street. There is one small parcel not included in the proposal because is not under St. Anthony's ownership. Southeast of the main campus site is the current location of the social hall. The current proposal is to demolish the social hall and create an additional parking area. North of the site at 215 Whitworth Avenue is the proposed location of the rectory where the applicant would modify an existing residential structure. The applicant is requesting renovations and additions to the existing parish campus. This proposal includes the two phases that are part of a larger 20-year master plan. Under phase one the project would construct a two story building that would be located on and adjacent to Whitworth Avenue. The City Council tentatively approved the street vacation of Whitworth Avenue requested by the applicant. The street vacation approval outlines certain things that would be required in a development agreement. The proposal is to vacate the portion of Whitworth Avenue between the southern campus boundary on South 4`1' Street to about two-thirds of the block to the parcel just south of the alley. They also propose to vacate the alley running north-south for the same distance from South 4`11 Street about two-thirds into the block. They would also dedicate additional right- of-way to the east-west alley portion to make it a width of 24 feet. Staff originally recommended that the site plan be approved subject to the elimination of construction or structures proposed within the right-of-way. With the City Council's approval of the street vacation staff will amend some of those conditions. Under Phase I the proposal would construct a two-story building that would extend over Whitworth Avenue connecting both the east and west sides of the property. The building on its south side would connect to the existing parish ministry center. The ground floor of the proposed building would include a social hall,kitchen, nursery, library, offices, lobby and reception area,gymnasium,kindergarten classrooms and restroom and storage areas. The second story would also include additional offices, meeting rooms, staff lounge areas, youth ministry choir and art rooms. The existing church building, parish ministry center and school building would remain unaltered with the exception of structural integration of the ministry center with the new building. Prior to the construction of the new building,the existing rectory currently situated on the northeast corner of Whitworth Avenue and South 4°i Street would be demolished. The rectory function is proposed to be relocated to an existing residence at 215 Whitworth Avenue however based on Council's decision the applicant has agreed to withdraw that portion of the request and construct a rectory somewhere within the boundaries of the main parish campus. Also included in Phase I would be demolition of the existing social hall located southeast of the site. In its place the proposal is to create 75 parking stalls to be used in conjunction with parish campus functions. Si. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 3 Parking areas within the interior of the main campus area would be created that would accommodate 150 parking spaces. Phase II would construct a two-story addition to the proposed structure at its northwest corner. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M) for the project. This determination included four mitigation measures and no appeals were filed. The mitigation measures include a provision of a pedestrian walkway through the campus; the applicant must provide the required amount of parking for each phase prior to the completion of that phase, and payment of Fire and Traffic Mitigation Fees. The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan. The objective in the Comprehensive Plan is to provide for Urban Environments expected to redevelop as destination shopping areas providing neighborhood, citywide and sub regional services. In this case the applicant is asking for approval to expand an existing parish campus containing church related uses. While the proposal does not directly satisfy economic redevelopment objectives,the use does provide neighborhood and or citywide services and also may serve as a draw to existing commercial businesses and future businesses in the downtown core. Therefore,the proposal is generally consistent with polices adopted by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The zoning designation for the site is also Center Downtown(CD). Church and/or church related uses are allowed in the CD zone provided a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit is approved. The parish has been located at this site since the early 1900's. There are multiple church related uses within the downtown area. The proposal to expand the campus would not result in additional church use. In response to questioning from the Examiner, Ms.Nishihira replied that her department is concerned with the number of churches in the downtown area; however,this is an existing use and St. Anthony's could continue to operate as they are because they are grandfathered in. Council was also concerned that is why in the street vacation decision it states that the applicant must establish a development agreement, which requires a public hearing and a signature by the Mayor. This will basically establish the boundaries depicted as the final boundaries of the parish. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. They would perform renovations and new construction within the currently established campus boundaries. These portions of the proposal are generally suitable for the location in that it'would further establish the campus setting desired by the applicant by bringing the uses closer together and lessening the existing disconnected nature of the parish. Staffs recommendation regarding the rectory was that it not be approved north of the campus as proposed which is also consistent with what the City Council has required as a condition of the street vacation approval. In the CD zone building lot coverage is limited to 65 percent of the lot area. For the main campus portion of the proposal the expansion would increase existing parish owned property by pulling in acquired parcels and would also construct larger buildings. The total ground floor footprints of the buildings would result in lot coverage of 35.6 percent,well below the 65 percent maximum. The proposal to demolish the existing social hall and construct a parking lot on the southeast lot would result in zero lot coverage. • St. Anthony's Catholic Church Audition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 4 In the CD zone a minimum setback of 10 feet is required on all street frontages. These setbacks must also be landscaped. In the staff report it states that the applicant will need to revise the site plan to provide the correct setback on the south side of the social hall; however,the applicant does comply with the 10-foot setback requirement and the staff report needs to be corrected. The proposed height for the structure is 32 feet and the CD zone allows a 95-foot height. The subject property is located in a predominantly transitional area,which contains existing single-family residences as well as commercial uses. Although the area is zoned CD there are a significant number of single- family residences that have been grandfathered in as permitted uses under the adopted zoning designation. The parish has been in existence for a long time; however, proposed expansions to the campus will result in an impact to properties within the vicinity of the site. Staff is recommending that some areas be improved to increase buffers to adjacent properties. Parking regulations require that a specific number of stalls be provided for specific uses. The applicability section of the parking regulations exempts existing uses that are not increased by more then one-third of its land area. What was analyzed in this case was the parking that would be required for the proposed structures, the new areas, and essentially allowed them to continue with the number of existing stalls for the parish. The renovations and additions to the campus would result in a required 225 spaces be provided for the campus. The parish currently contains 112 spaces. As part of proposed Phase I, 155 stalls would be provided for the property. In addition,the existing social hall would be demolished and replaced with 75 parking stalls. Overall, the proposal would provide 230 stalls within the main campus area. Some of the parking areas are intended to have dual functions and will be used as play areas during the day. Parking has always been an area of concern when it comes to the existing parish. Current parking issues and problems that result from church related uses would be improved by the proposal by providing more on-site parking. Staff and Council are still concerned that there will not be enough parking provided. Since they do meet Code, staff felt if would be appropriate to address possible additional parking needs through the Development Agreement that Council has required as part of the street vacation approval. What will have to be looked into is the actual number of spaces required for existing uses as well as those required for the proposed uses. Real world applications to determine what number of overall parking stalls is appropriate for the campus will have to be discussed. The street vacation may result in redirecting traffic to other side streets in order to create a linkage from South 3rd Street to South 4th Street. The ERC has required that pedestrian linkages be provided for the public. The existing campus is situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses particularly single-family residences and small commercial establishments. The campus would result in the intensification of the church use. The applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan. Short-term noise impacts from the initial construction of the project would be mitigated by existing code provisions limiting work hours as well as the applicant's construction mitigation plan. The landscape plan submitted with the application includes the use of screen shrubs along the eastern street fronting side of the parking area along Morris Avenue. Additional landscaping is proposed to be provided throughout the perimeters and interior of the parish campus; however the Code currently requires a minimum landscape of 10 feet be provided along all street frontages. At this time the portion along Morris Avenue is proposed at five feet in width and there is an area along the portion of Whitworth Avenue on the north portion of the site that is not to be vacated that is less then 10 feet in width. Staff feels that an appropriate recommendation would be to require additional landscaping be provided so as to not lose any parking stalls. St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 5 The project will be required to complete any necessary street and utility improvements. This will include water mains,fire hydrants and payment of utility system development charges. The applicant is aware of this. Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the site plan that has been submitted and proposed by the applicant, which is based on Council's approval to vacate Whitworth Avenue. Staff recommends three conditions of approval including not constructing the rectory off-site, revision of the site plan and landscape plan to maintain the on-site landscaping as proposed and the addition of five feet of off-site landscaping within the right-of-way portions adjacent to the sidewalk and phase II of the project be completed 10 years from the approval date of the project. Staff rescinds the condition that the applicant not use the Whitworth Avenue right-of-way to construct the project. Nancy Bainbridge-Rogers, Cairncross &Hempelmann, 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98104 stated that she is representing the Archdiocese and St. Anthony's Parish for this project. She then submitted a hearing brief. St.Anthony's Parish has created a 20-year master plan for renovation of expansion. The current application covers the first 10 years and two phases of the master plan. It is intended to accommodate existing parish members and school students by renovating and expanding existing cramped facilities to meet current codes. It is not intended to grow the parish. The applicant does support staffs recommendation, it has taken a long time to get to this point. The applicant is withdrawing the rectory proposal at 215 Whitworth Avenue. =.In regard to landscaping, Ms. Rogers stated that this issue has arisen because the Code actually has a five-foot standard within the parking lot requirements. The 10-foot landscaping standard is within the Center Downtown (CD)requirements and could arguably be applied to where there are actual buildings and not parking lots. This is how the project was designed. The parish supports staffs recommendations. Bill Rutledge, Rutledge Maul Architects, 19336 47`h Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98115 reviewed is experience as an architect. The 2ICI-year plan was completed in July of 2000. It was developed over a series of meetings with the parish as well as neighborhood meetings. They went through a fairly extensive process to examine the programs and other activities for the church, social hall and school. The school is for Kindergarten through eighth grade and has 520 students enrolled. Most of the uses in the plan are not being changed. The school will continue to have only 520 students. The parish size is not expected to increase substantially over that period of time. After developing the Master Plan they focused on phases I and II. They also received feedback from the neighbors and started through the street vacation process. As a result of a series of meetings with City Council and two additional neighborhood meetings,the plan was revised. They have acquired two additional pieces of property to the north of the doctor's property which provided an additional 31 parking stalls which brought the total to 230 stalls for proposed phases I and II. The parking lot off of Morris Avenue will have its entry off of the alleyway. Bob Herman,Herman Traffic Engineers, 15324 SE 133`d Court,Renton, WA 98059 stated that he is the traffic engineer for the project and prepared the original traffic impact analysis for the street vacation in November of 2000. He reviewed the differences in the project from the original plan to the current plan. The existing site consists of a primary area where parents park to wait for their children in the afternoon. The problem is that the areas fill up very quickly and there are vehicles spilling out onto Whitworth Avenue and onto South 4th Street regularly during the afternoon pick-up times. In comparison,the proposal increases the parking area on-site and provides more of an access length into the parking areas so that any spillage that does occur, occurs on-site and can be dealt without effecting the adjacent street traffic. The morning drop-off has not been an issue. The proposal more then doubles the current number of parking stalls. In his professional opinion this will decrease the demand for on-street parking. St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation • File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 6 In the new proposal the uses will remain the same as they are currently. The expansion is to accommodate the current usage. The number of students is not expected to increase as a result of the proposal and in the firsttwo phases the number of seats in the church will not increase either. He does not project any increases in traffic trips to the site. One of the biggest benefits of the campus proposed is that it eliminates pedestrian crossings of Whitworth Avenue,Morris Avenue, and South 4th Street. Currently,the children must make these crossings to get to the • gym. The proposal creates a much safer environment for the students. Mr. Herman prepared an addendum to the traffic study prepared previously, analyzing the impacts of redeveloping the area. Greg McNabb, Pastoral Assistant for Administration, 314 South 4`h,Renton, WA 98055 reviewed his responsibilities with the parish. There are currently about 2,350 registered households as part of the parish, which is probably close to 8,000 individuals. There are 520 students in the school, which includes nearly 340 families. About two-thirds to three-quarters of those are parish members. St. Anthony's was established at the corner of 4th Avenue and Morris Avenue almost 100 years ago. It has been in this location and growing since that time. The process for this current proposal began about five years ago but he has been involved for the past three years and is best suited to answer questions pertaining to the past three years. In developing the Master Plan they invited those within 300 feet of the site to a public meeting to discuss the plan. Several neighbors attended and offered feedback on the initial plan. Discussions with the City on the street vacation issue began about two years ago. After discussion with City Council one year ago and a subsequent meeting with neighbors they made changes to the plan and realized that parking was a major issue. Last winter they called another community meeting and no neighbors attended. In regard to staffing,there are about 20 employees many of which are doubled up in offices. They do not perceive an increase in staff in relation to the additional space at this point. Gary Teale,Principal of St. Anthony's School, 336 Shattuck Avenue South,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he is in support of the plan that has been submitted. The students enrolled at the school are dealing with inadequate facilities on a daily basis, as are the teachers. This plan will allow the expansion of the facilities to provide better educational facilities for the students. There are also safety issues. There are approximately eight to 10 classes a day that must travel across three streets to get to the gym. The plan also provides more security and better control of access onto the campus. Kathleen Fraker, 7222 SE 135'1', Seattle, WA 98178 stated that she is a parent and a coach for some of the students at the school. Having to walk the students across those three streets to get them to the gym has been stressful. Mike Borte, 11254 SE 190'h Court, Renton, WA 98055 stated that he is the Director of Faith Formation at St. Anthony's and has lived in Renton for 20 years. He is familiar with the downtown area and feels the proposed plan works well with the downtown Renton neighborhood. Arlind Buzz Johnson, 334 Wells Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055 stated that he feels this new plan will take the focus off of 4th Avenue and Morris Avenue and shift it west towards the parking lot. He feels that this proposal will be an asset to the community. St:Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 7 William Flynn, 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 read a letter he wrote to the City Council. He pointed out that a church in the Highlands has just gone through the same type of scenario and so far there have been no transportation problems. Wade Cross, 322 Morris Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 displayed a drawing with a circle around the church to represent the parking pattern that happens currently and will continue to happen. It is his understanding that the school has a procedure to be used by parents dropping their children off but it is not being followed. The • circle depicts where individuals would intend to park and part of the line actually goes through the campus where the new parking will be located is much further away then areas where individuals currently park. His opinion is that this plan will not take care of the parking problem. There will be parking eliminated on Whitworth Avenue that is currently overflow parking for adjacent buildings. He does not understand how the church could be a draw to business. He does not see how it is benefiting the area. He also stated that he cannot see that this plan is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is attempting to prevent sprawl and trying to concentrate intensity of use in the downtown area and how can this project be defined as doing that when spreading the campus across the street. He does not feel that this is a community resource. Many of the parish members are unable to send their children to the school because they'cannot get far enough up the list. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 stated in regard to the lost parking on Whitworth Avenue that the parking that was on Morris Avenue that will be going down to 4th Avenue was going to be available for general parking during the times the church is not using it. Ms. Rogers pointed out that the circle drawn by Mr. Cross includes parking areas that will be provided on the new campus plan.'Another issue raised by Mr. Cross was the loss of spaces on Whitworth Avenue, the application and the staff report reflect that there are 112 spaces considered existing for St. Anthony's and that actually includes 15 space on Whitworth Avenue. Those spaces are being replaced elsewhere on campus. The new parking lot will be stripped, landscaped and far more inviting as to where individuals are supposed to park. With regard to compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, there is a lengthy document included with the application materials setting forth the justification for the Conditional Use Permit, which goes through a multitude of Comprehensive Plan Policies that are advanced by this proposal. The no trespassing signs on-site are clearly to protect the safety of the school children during the day. Principal Teale stated that the no trespassing signs were put out at the request of the Renton Police Department. It allowed the Police Department if there was inappropriate activity going on in the late evening the right to arrest them at that time. Individuals are welcome to use the recreation areas as long as they are not destructive. Ms. Rogers stated that individuals currently park on side streets because the on-site parking is grossly overcrowded and circulation is very difficult. The new plan streamlines the circulation through the site, which is one of the goals of the plan. Ms.Nishihira added that there is a footnote within the Center Downtown Development Standards that allows for some flexibility with how to accomplish the required 10-foot landscape buffer. I ' St. Anthony's Catholic Church,....iition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 8 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:12 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant,Archdiocese of Seattle(owner),for the St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation, filed a request for approval of a conditional use permit to expand an existing church,renovate and add facilities. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is generally located around 314 South 4tn Street. The majority of the subject site is on the north side of South 4th, between Shattuck Avenue South on the west and Morris Avenue South on the east. Whitworth Avenue currently runs through the middle of the site. A second property is located south of South 4th Street at Morris Avenue and its existing building would be demolished and replaced with a parking lot. A third property located at 215 Whitworth Avenue South was proposed as a new Rectory building but the conditional use permit request for it was withdrawn at the hearing as part of a development agreement reached with the City Council. (see the attachment) 6. The subject site is zoned CD (Center Downtown). 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban commercial, retail, service and urban residential uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes churches serve the needs of community residents. 8. The eastern portion of the subject site was part of the original town site of the City of Renton in 1901. The western portion was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 156 enacted in May 1909. 9. The subject site is in the middle of downtown Renton and is surrounded by a variety of commercial,retail and residential uses, including single-family uses. The subject site is outside of a"parking exempt" area and is required to provide parking per code requirements. 10. The subject site is a slightly irregularly shaped site that jogs around some third party properties on the north and east. The subject site would incorporate a portion of Whitworth Avenue South and a portion of a north-south alley east of Whitworth Avenue South. The subject site would be 216,576 square feet or 4.97 acres. 11. The subject site is flat. St:Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 9 • 12. The subject site includes the existing St. Anthony's main church, school, rectory building and supporting buildings on the main campus. The main campus is located north of South 4th. The site also includes a social hall that doubles as a gymnasium. The social hall is located at South 4th and Morris Avenue, south and east of the main campus. 13. Commercial Uses are located north of the site and most front on South 3`d Street, the main commercial street running west to east through the downtown area. Commercial uses are also located east of the site and west of the site where the old Kmart store was located. South are residential uses and the railroad right-of-way.: 14. As indicated above,the applicant has requested the vacation(VAC-00-003) (02-054) of a portion of Whitworth Avenue from South 4th to the east-west alley located between 4th and 3`d. They also requested the vacation of a portion of the north-south alley located between Whitworth Avenue and Morris Avenue (not to be confused with the east-west alley). If the City Council ultimately approves the vacation request, these areas would become part of the campus and be used for buildings, parking and other internal purposes. The City Council has entered into a draft agreement with the applicant that requires the applicant to abandon its campus expansion beyond certain boundaries and requires the new rectory to be in the main campus and not on a lot outside of the specified main campus boundaries. The applicant would dedicate property along the south side of the east-west alley(south of South 3rd)to widen it to 24 feet to improve circulation with the loss of Whitworth Avenue. 15. This review anticipates that the vacation will be approved as it includes plans for development over the "to be vacated" rights-of-way. Staffs recommendations also anticipate vacation approval except as they mentioned the off-campus rectory proposal. As noted above, at the hearing the applicant withdrew the plans for the'off-campus rectory. The development agreement called for structural support for additional stories to apparently allow vertical expansion within the campus boundaries. 16. The proposed renovation and expansion will be phased. Phase I would include a new two-story addition to the Parish Ministry Center and new Social Hall along the south end of the campus. It would be located over and east of the vacated portion of Whitworth Avenue. North of that, in the center of the campus would be a new gymnasium. Near the southeast corner of the gym would be new two-story additions to the school, designated as kindergarten space. The upper story would include office and meeting space, staff lounge and youth ministry, choir and art rooms. The existing rectory would be demolished. The remainder of the buildings would remain as is. 17. Phase I would require the demolition of the existing social hall south of 4th and the development of a 75 stall parking area. An additional 150 parking stalls would be created within the boundaries of the new campus generally north of the complex and south of the east-west alley(south of South 3`d). An area in the northwest portion of the campus will serve as play area during school hours and provide 69 stalls during other hours. 18. Phase II would provide a new school facility immediately west of the gym and north of the kindergarten space. 19. Phase III would involve school expansion but is not part of this current proposal. 20. Phase IV would involve expansion of the church but is not part of this current proposal. 21. Phase I is proposed to start later this year after all approvals are final including the street and alley vacation. The applicant estimates it would be completed in the summer of 2004. Phase II would occur St. Anthony's Catholic Church huumion/Renovation ,. File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 10 between 2002 and 2007. Both phases would be complete within 10 years. 22. The church has been in this area since the early 1900's. The applicant does not plan to appreciably increase any of the services they offer. The expansion is to accommodate the existing services and personnel in a more comfortable fashion. 23. The CD Zone permits structures to be 95 feet tall,with 65 percent lot coverage, and setbacks of between 10 and 15 feet along streets. The proposed structures meet those requirements. The two-story buildings will be approximately 32 feet tall. The buildout will result in approximately 35.6 percent lot coverage with a footprint of approximately 62,205 square feet. There will be the appropriate setbacks. There was one instance where the setback would have been five(5)to(7 ) feet along South 4th but that has been recalculated and rectified. 24. The use is a mix of uses with varying parking requirements. Churches require one parking stall for each five seats in the assembly hall. Auditoriums and gymnasiums require one stall for each four seats or 100 square feet. Office uses require three stalls for each 1,000,square feet. Staff calculated that the proposal requires 225 stalls. Redevelopment will result in 155 stalls within the main campus and an additional 75 stalls in the location of the old social hall, south of South 4th Street. 25. The applicant has reworked the school bus access and parent pickup and drop-off circulation to better accommodate flow on the campus and around the campus. The closure of Whitworth Avenue will alter some traffic patterns in the area but the vacation is not part of this review. The ERC required a pedestrian route through the campus to connect South 4th Street and South 3rd Street. The applicant has provided such a connection meandering through the campus but avoiding the school area for safety reasons. 26. The applicant proposes screening landscape materials, mainly pyramidalis, along Morris Avenue to screen properties across from the parking area. Street and ornamental trees as well as conifer and shrubs are proposed along other perimeter areas as well as in the interior. Ten feet of landscaping is required along all street frontages and this was not proposed. Staff recommended that it be required as a condition of approval or incorporated into street plantings. 27. Other churches in the area are St. Paul Ministries,Pilgrims Rest and Christ Scientist. 28. Residents in the area are concerned about impacts of the church, particularly traffic impacts. As noted above,the street and alley vacation are issues before the City Council and not part of the Conditional Use Review. Conclusions: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C),which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; St. Anthony's Catholic Church Aadition/Renovation • File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 11 e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates churches and schools in the community. The Comprehensive Plan also envisions urban services as well as economic development. While the proposed use will not generate retail sales,the school is an employment base. In addition, the Master Plan for the church demonstrates a concentrated and vertical, although still low-rise, campus,which is appropriate in an urban downtown area. 3. The Zoning Code permits churches by conditional use permit. The code also has height, bulk and setback requirements as well as landscaping requirements. In the main,the proposed use meets all of the criteria. The plans now show compliance with the appropriate setbacks. Landscaping will have to be supplemented. Compliance with the Fire and Building Codes will be reviewed when a permit is submitted. 4. This office does not generally review community need for churches: There is no way to judge whether one or another religious denomination needs space and facilities in any area. The fact is that this church has been a fixture in downtown Renton for nearly 100 years. 5. There is no doubt that the existing church has impacts on the surrounding community and that an expanded church will continue to have impacts. But the proposal will route more traffic into the campus, will provide additional stacking or queuing space and will provide substantially more parking. The Development Agreement also limits the "off-campus" impacts by specifying the "growth boundaries" for the church and eliminated an off-campus rectory. In addition,the church is in a downtown area, a commercial hub and urban tumult is expected. The Zone would permit buildings up to 95 feet tall,which could have more substantial impacts on the surrounding uses. 6. The majority of the campus will be two-story buildings which is compatible in scale with the surrounding uses including single family homes which can also be two-stories in height. In addition,the campus will observe a 10'to 15 foot landscaped setback, helping to soften the impacts of the complex on the surrounding streets. 7. The applicant will be developing additional parking resources as outlined above. Parking for approximately 250 vehicles will be available on campus and within a block of the church. This should help minimize some of the impacts felt in the surrounding community. 8. Traffic circulation will obviously change with the vacation of Whitworth Avenue and the alley but that is a subject reviewed by the City Council. The applicant intends to better serve the school and its parents with more internal circulation. In addition,traffic has been routed away from Morris toward the arterial streets. The applicant will also be widening an east-west alley to provide better circulation adjacent to the campus. Some circulation issues will obviously crop up after the vacations are approved but the City will clearly St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 12 monitor those issues. 9. The applicant has designated a pedestrian route through the campus to help neighbors reach the shopping arterial of South 3rd Street and substitute for the closed Whitworth Avenue corridor. In addition, school children will be circulating on campus rather than crossing streets to get to the gym as they do now. 10. The applicant will have to supplement its landscaping and meet code requirements. Staff shall make sure that landscaping along Morris Avenue actually serves to screen the adjacent uses. 11. The church campus is expected to have ancillary activities in its various component parts but staff will have to determine if they are permitted or require separate permitting. The primary purpose of the campus is education and services and their related facilities. 12. The applicant will be phasing the project over approximately 20 years with the first two phases intended for years one to 10. This seems appropriate although it is hoped that the turmoil of development and redevelopment does not strain the neighbors for a continuous period over that extended period. Decision: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The finalization of the street and alley vacation. 2. The applicant shall execute and be bound by the Development Agreement. 3. The rectory shall be on-campus and subject to further permitting as required. 4. The applicant shall provide code mandated landscaping as determined by staff Staff shall make sure landscaping effectively screens along Morris Avenue South. 5. The Conditional Use Permit shall be null and void if the vacation is not approved by the City Council. ORDERED THIS 6th day of August, 2002. FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER Sf. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 13 TRANSMITTED THIS 6`h day of August,2002 to the parties of record: Lesley Nishihira Kayren Kittrick Archdiocese of Seattle 1055 S. Grady Way 1055 S. Grady Way 910 Marion Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104 St. Anthony Parish Nancy Bainbridge Rogers Bill Rutledge • 314 South 4th Street 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Rutledge Maul Architects Renton,WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104-2323 19336 47th Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98115 Bob Herman Greg McNabb Gary Teale Herman Traffic Engineers St. Anthony's Principal, St. Anthony's 15324 SE 133rd Court 314 South 4th Street 336 Shattuck Avenue South Renton,WA 98059 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Kathleen Fraker Mike Borte Arlind Buzz Johnson 7222 SE 135'h 11254 SE 190`h Court 334 Wells Avenue Seattle,WA 98178 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 William Flynn Wade Cross Rutledge Maul Architects 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE 322 Morris Avenue South Mark Stine Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 19336 47`h Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98155 TRANSMITTED THIS 6`h day of August, 2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100G of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,August 20,2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. • An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. St. Anthony's Catholic Church Aaaition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 14 Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,August 20,2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. -• • • 4%777) CITY OF RENTON arditflail„VV„./' c..14T r, • .. _ - ' v, ;r .„.. . Office of the City Cleric ,1.7ia f"1 s , ceillta •t;V CCP 4.1 .!.4.esb _rob • • '0014pw., 611 sow 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 r. • II METER U•ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED \.1 0/7 u04/ `.'er„"o' •(-7r2:- • • v-, • Crry op •, • • ex • RENTON •<1 •,,-- •oi• • ' - • oken SEp " a 144th A . - 2 200z • c. cLE- ry RceiV , ,, OFF • '10 • • • %," This paper contains 50%recycled paper,20%post-consumer • • • • • • • CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) BONNIE I. WALTON, City Clerk/Cable Manager for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 26th day of September, 2002, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, Notice of Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Wade Cross, appellant, for the St. Anthony Parish Conditional Use Application; File No. LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF, AAD. 6407 .4- tJa-1 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk/Cable Manager SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this oce day of , 2002. I -A"Jr-CA/L0(9 Suz D. Lombard (fd Notary Public in and for th Sta f ° Washington, residing at 2a; e , ° My Commission Expires: 9 o°,� ClY{ OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: AJLS Dept./City Cleric For Agenda of: 9/9/2002 • Dept/Div/Board.. Bonnie I. Walton Staff Contact Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 Regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition at 314 S. 4th St. File No.: LUA-02-054, CU-H,ECF, AAD Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Sessions Information B. Appeal (8/20/2002) C. Hearing Examiner's Report &Decision (8/6/2002) Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Wade D. Cross, accompanied by required$75.00 fee received 8/20/2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: C:\Documents and Settings\rcomijo\Local Settings\Temp\AGENDA BILL.DOC/ August 26, 2002 APPEAL FILED BY: Wade D. Cross RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition Conditional Use Application for 314S. 4th St. (File No. LUA-02-054, CU-H,ECF, AAD) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation and Addition conditional use application for the above-referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is September 5th, 2002. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in the local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council secretary at 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at (425) 430-6502. Sincerely, )80764A.t. Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Attachments cc: Council Secretary /-77 —.02—o5V- •. " • CITT OF RENTON • , i , City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor " . Bonnie I.Walton August,26,2002 ' APPEAL FILED BY: ' Wade D. Cross , RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 8/6/2002 regarding the' St. Anthony's-Catholic Church Renovation and Addition Conditional Use ' Application for314 S. 4th St. (File No. LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF, AAD) - To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the ' Hearing Examiner's decision regarding. the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Renovation ' and Addition conditional use application for the above-referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. , • In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the.City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days , of the date'of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is September 5th, 2002. • NOTICE IS HEREBY 'GIVEN that the written'appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify' all parties of record. of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in,the local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council secretary at 425-430-6501 for . information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented.for consideration by the full.Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is'a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner, decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a . . showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have'been available • . at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. ' For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at (425) 430-6502. Sincerely, , . eo-it;rui el Cda,et-i -yt ' . : • Bonnie I. Walton , . . City Clerk . Attachments ' , cc: Council Secretary ' . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer APPEAL - HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION o REM& CITY COUNCIL. FILE NO. LC( f - d2 " OG- ; ECFi Cut-N AUG 2 0 2002 to APPLICATION NAME: Wade,P, cc) . L ro5S f M RECEIVtu The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the d�3i WFS OFFICE recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated R ,/ _Rut." 6 T k 20 62 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name: W aJ e. 0 . �- IOs S Name: Address:3 2 2 ( O (� S a / i , S , Address: BerJ+ON) / lJ �� ggc�SS Telephone No. Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please ides' attee numbern� as denoted in the Examiner'sJ rep rt) No. Error: a 6Kc 7�1 fear'5— 19( �� C.IJ t CY e- - d ` r Cddw O ' fir Correction:" g'r /l N"`S Pat iSti5 u(( h e tvet l l ,P tn14€0 MdniN�s-f-Fp f✓��Se mac_ CONCLUSIONS: No. Error J� �Q' 4-/11 e_ o4 rkt/. / &r kir✓y' Correction:kis i�1/ 5-k lla/ 54,4',Vi A.)A Ate it bD/N%•'v.9 b r )esse C OTHER No. Error: C&%iti te3 f W 5 0-4 GI,I4 �I 7�►'? Crass �4-( KS �oip.Ankr � �T �ocia I °l�lf cure_ Correction: 0 Q�jGP t' 016 / 4 nl (7^�` k/-c �D P c*- pee l 4-ktJd Ca'o I/�GY i-� C C . 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: (,Ji ed tNI d►^!`)� Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other e` 00 p ellant/Represen ative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific appeal procedures. heappeal.doc/forms • City of Renton Municipal Code; Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110 -Appeals 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170,the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or other body, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9- 13-82, Amd. Ord.4899, 3-19-2001) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council-Procedures: (See above for Time for Appeal) 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five(5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation,findings and 'conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1- 25-93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive,unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord.4660, 3-17-1997) Archdiocese of Seattle Nancy Bainbridge Rogers St.Anthony Parish 910 Marion Street 524 Second Avenue,Suite 500 314 South 4th Street Seattle,WA 98104 Seattle,WA 98104-2323 Renton,WA 98055 Bill Rutledge Bob Herman Greg McNabb Rutledge Maul Architects Herman Traffic Engineers St.Anthony's Parish 19336 47th Avenue NE 15324 SE 1331d Court 314 South 4th Street Seattle,WA 98115 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98055 Gary Teale Kathleen Fraker Mike Borte Principal,St.Anthony's 7222 SE 135th 11254 SE 190th Court 336 Shattuck Avenue South Seattle,WA 98178 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Arlind Buzz Johnson William Flynn Wade Cross 334 Wells Avenue /\pttZ2 1 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE 322 Morris Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 • Rutledge Maul Architects _____ _ Mark Stine 19336 47th Avenue NE Seattle,WA 98155 CITY CLERK DIVISION Send Copies To: Date: a�� / CITY ATTORNEY . Includes POR from hearing,applicant, 7 CITY COUNCIL owner,contact,less Lesley COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS � I. EDNSP/ECONOMIC DEVELOP. G!-L FINANCE/INFO SERVICES / FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTION behAy / HEARING EXAMINER HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT HUMAN SERVICES LIBRARIES MAYOR/EXECUTIVE MUNICIPAL COURT /l�� PLANNING COMMISSION 4 v�v U /9"V. POLICE CODIFIER NEWSPAPER /3 PARTIES OF RECORD— , Planning/Building/Public Worlfi / ADMINISTRATION d4 AIRPORT ahi 2/ DEVELOPII ENT SERVICES i Jt °A--t/ / TRANSPORTATION SERVICES / UTILITIES&TECH SERVICES r /4 35 APPEAL - HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATIONYlCF1 NI(AT CITY COUNCIL. FILE NO. L (.( n - O 2 - 66-L-1 ; E C Fr C - AUG 2 0 2002 APPLICATION NAME: Wade,e, F i • G P/7ss M RECElVtu The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the d bi i it Feir-';OFFICE recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated R (/T _ U�/A Cf" 6 V\ 20 © 2 . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name: Wad e- 0 . C 1-c s Name: Address:3 2 2 (I D(.-r-i 5 A , S. . Address: Beni--© J , W R .g© s Telephone No. Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please 'ides a�tee number as denoted in the Examiner's rep ) No. Error: a SKI - al /frrI P1), S. &c_ E.ficie v1 e 7 dl LOYal to*/ ' O 1 'Ierrf, if Correction:4' °S-7 Adc4-1/9A) 15' Pat i54 �1,01 l kr b e Y`e-cfDIAd 1 t 5 CONCLUSIONS: y dyad �� —r— ( ;� er kiA)5 No. Error. I� i�° ©SS ® �l Correction:kr^k / 5-kew 0 /e 5hdrea A)1-14 Pre k6,Dr/4/5 h Jessec OTHER // No. Error: f/`e/ %G ed,��l`Ar Wit 5 Jid 0,E4 W r�`�'1 Grass u.),1 kS 4o pa+ *I ri 5-oda I 1 w)/ c.re-- A)41L-Atid Correction: /QgG1 f/`e a)a ,� a i✓ ('5 k 5- P+0 CF peep k) yyte Ca'o-►/-GY 7-49 i C , 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: X Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: (.Ji /J Mdr/k/ Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other ;;Ak 0 ‘ 16r-i )------- 0e7:061 70-7--- p ellant/Represen ative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter S, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific appeal procedures. heappeal.doc/forms City of Renton Municipal Code; Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 -Appeals 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170,the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or other body,any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14)calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9- 13-82,Amd. Ord.4899, 3-19-2001) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council-Procedures: (See above for Time for Appeal) 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony,it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council,and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord.4389, 1- 25-93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2'and F3, and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive,unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord.4660, 3-17-1997) NOTES RECEIPT DATE ://2-0 NO. 9113 RECEIVED FROM I A)0-de r-o SS ADDRESS $ co •,t FOR A-A-Hook LI A-- 0 L CAC 1 ACCOUNT HOW PAID ANT.OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID BALANCE HONEY DUE CHECK 00 ORDER ) )1 By r 4 A f••••-, • 1 C)1998 WIFORMO 8L802 / Appeal 8/20/02 L. . y „ - . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Kelly Williams being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 6th day of August, 2002 affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: )< LQQLkI)LZ�o SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this b-.=day of , 2002. a ,!s D. L0 4a,1 c,'OCITARD,W. 'a' D. a of Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing X r , v a ',J ng at Se,a --Ike_ , therein. IA °Oo °° r. Application, Petition, or Case No.: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT August 6, 2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: . St.Anthony Parish 314 South 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H LOCATION: 314 South 4th Street(parish)&215 Whitworth Avenue South (rectory) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is proposing to renovate and add-on to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on July 9,2002. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the July 16,2002 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,July 16,2002 at 9:03 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Overall Campus Plan application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Vicinity Map Exhibit No. 4: Main Campus Site Plan Exhibit No. 5: SE Parking&Rectory Site Plan Exhibit No. 6: Main Floor Plan Exhibit No. 7: Upper Floor Plan Exhibit No. 8: Building Elevations Exhibit No. 9: Rectory Floor Plan&Elevations Exhibit No. 10a,b,& c: Landscape Plans Exhibit No. 11: Zoning Plan Exhibit No. 12: Street Vacation Approval St.Anthony's Catholic Church Aaaition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 2 Exhibit No. 13: Downtown Core Area Exhibit No. 14: Hearing Brief Exhibit No. 15: Rutledge Resume Exhibit No. 16: Master Plan,Phase Outlined in Color Exhibit No. 17: Pedestrian Linkage Exhibit No. 18: Herman Resume Exhibit No. 19a: Existing Graphic of Site Exhibit No. 19b: Graphic—Proposed Traffic Solutions Exhibit No.20: Traffic Addendum Exhibit No.21: Circle Around Church Indicating Parking Areas The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD) and is surrounded by similarly zoned properties,however some of those are existing single- family residential uses that are now grandfathered in. There are also some commercial businesses within former residential structures as well as new structures. The central area is the main parish campus and includes the church, proposed social hall and school functions and is generally bounded on the west by Shattuck Avenue, on the east by Morris Avenue, on the south side by South 4th Street and on the north side there is a alley that runs east-west south of South 3rd Street. There is one small parcel not included in the proposal because is not under St. Anthony's ownership. Southeast of the main campus site is the current location of the social hall. The current proposal is to demolish the social hall and create an additional parking area. North of the site at 215 Whitworth Avenue is the proposed location of the rectory where the applicant would modify an existing residential structure. The applicant is requesting renovations and additions to the existing parish campus. This proposal includes the two phases that are part of a larger 20-year master plan. Under phase one the project would construct a two story building that would be located on and adjacent to Whitworth Avenue. The City Council tentatively approved the street vacation of Whitworth Avenue requested by the applicant. The street vacation approval outlines certain things that would be required in a development agreement. The proposal is to vacate the portion of Whitworth Avenue between the southern campus boundary on South 4th Street to about two-thirds of the block to the parcel just south of the alley. They also propose to vacate the alley running north-south for the same distance from South 4th Street about two-thirds into the block. They would also dedicate additional right- of-way to the east-west alley portion to make it a width of 24 feet. Staff originally recommended that the site plan be approved subject to the elimination of construction or structures proposed within the right-of-way. With the City Council's approval of the street vacation staff will amend some of those conditions. Under Phase I the proposal would construct a two-story building that would extend over Whitworth Avenue connecting both the east and west sides of the property. The building on its south side would connect to the existing parish ministry center. The ground floor of the proposed building would include a social hall,kitchen,nursery, library,offices, lobby and reception area, gymnasium,kindergarten classrooms and restroom and storage areas. The second story would also include additional offices,meeting rooms, staff lounge areas,youth ministry choir and art rooms. The existing church building,parish ministry center and school building would remain unaltered with the exception of structural integration of the ministry center with the new building. Prior to the construction of the.new building,the existing rectory currently situated on the northeast corner of Whitworth Avenue and South 4th Street would be demolished. The rectory function is proposed to be relocated to an existing residence at 215 Whitworth Avenue however based on Council's decision the applicant has agreed to withdraw that portion of the request and construct a rectory somewhere within the boundaries of the main parish campus. Also included in Phase I would be demolition of the existing social hall located southeast of the site. In its place the proposal is to create 75 parking stalls to be used in conjunction with parish campus functions. St. Anthony's Catholic Church Auaition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 3 Parking areas within the interior of the main campus area would be created that would accommodate 150 parking spaces. Phase II would construct a two-story addition to the proposed structure at its northwest corner. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M) for the project. This determination included four mitigation measures and no appeals were filed. The mitigation measures include a provision of a pedestrian walkway through the campus;the applicant must provide the required amount of parking for each phase prior to the completion of that phase, and payment of Fire and Traffic Mitigation Fees. The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD)on the City's Comprehensive Plan. The objective in the Comprehensive Plan is to provide for Urban Environments expected to redevelop as destination shopping areas providing neighborhood, citywide and sub regional services. In this case the applicant is asking for approval to expand an existing parish campus containing church related uses. While the proposal does not directly satisfy economic redevelopment objectives,the use does provide neighborhood and or citywide services and also may serve as a draw to existing commercial businesses and future businesses in the downtown core. Therefore,the proposal is generally consistent with polices adopted by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The zoning designation for the site is also Center Downtown(CD). Church and/or church related uses are allowed in the CD zone provided a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit is approved. The parish has been located at this site since the early 1900's. There are multiple church related uses within the downtown area. The proposal to expand the campus would not result in additional church use. In response to questioning from the Examiner, Ms.Nishihira replied that her department is concerned with the number of churches in the downtown area;however,this is an existing use and St.Anthony's could continue to operate as they are because they are grandfathered in. Council was also concerned that is why in the street vacation decision it states that the applicant must establish a development agreement,which requires a public hearing and a signature by the Mayor. This will basically establish the boundaries depicted as the final boundaries of the parish. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. They would perform renovations and new construction within the currently established campus boundaries. These portions of the proposal are generally suitable for the location in that it would further establish the campus setting desired by the applicant by bringing the uses closer together and lessening the existing disconnected nature of the parish. Staffs recommendation regarding the rectory was that it not be approved north of the campus as proposed which is also consistent with what the City Council has required as a condition of the street vacation approval. In the CD zone building lot coverage is limited to 65 percent of the lot area. For the main campus portion of the proposal the expansion would increase existing parish owned property by pulling in acquired parcels and would also construct larger buildings. The total ground floor footprints of the buildings would result in lot coverage of 35.6 percent,well below the 65 percent maximum. The proposal to demolish the existing social hall and construct a parking lot on the southeast lot would result in zero lot coverage. St.Anthony's Catholic Church Auuition/Renovation File No.: LUA;02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 4 In the CD zone a minimum setback of 10 feet is required on all street frontages. These setbacks must also be landscaped. In the staff report it states that the applicant will need to revise the site plan to provide the correct setback on the south side of the social hall;however,the applicant does comply with the 10-foot setback requirement and the staff report needs to be corrected. The proposed height for the structure is 32 feet and the CD zone allows a 95-foot height. The subject property is located in a predominantly transitional area,which contains existing single-family residences as well as commercial uses. Although the area is zoned CD there are a significant number of single- family residences that have been grandfathered in as permitted uses under the adopted zoning designation. The parish has been in existence for a long time;however,proposed expansions to the campus will result in an impact to properties within the vicinity of the site. Staff is recommending that some areas be improved to increase buffers to adjacent properties. Parking regulations require that a specific number of stalls be provided for specific uses. The applicability section of the parking regulations exempts existing uses that are not increased by more then one-third of its land area. What was analyzed in this case was the parking that would be required for the proposed structures,the new areas, and essentially allowed them to continue with the number of existing stalls for the parish. The renovations and additions to the campus would result in a required 225 spaces be provided for the campus. The parish currently contains 112 spaces. As part of proposed Phase I, 155 stalls would be provided for the property. In addition,the existing social hall would be demolished and replaced with 75 parking stalls. Overall,the proposal would provide 230 stalls within the main campus area. Some of the parking areas are intended to have dual functions and will be used as play areas during the day. Parking has always been an area of concern when it comes to the existing parish. Current parking issues and problems that result from church related uses would be improved by the proposal by providing more on-site parking. Staff;and Council are still concerned that there will not be enough parking provided. Since they do meet Code, staff felt if would be appropriate to address possible additional parking needs through the Development Agreement that Council has required as part of the street vacation approval. What will have to be looked into is the actual number of spaces required for existing uses as well as those required for the proposed uses. Real world applications to determine what number of overall parking stalls is appropriate for the campus will have to be discussed. The street vacation may result in redirecting traffic to other side streets in order to create a linkage from South 3rd Street to South 4th Street. The ERC has required that pedestrian linkages be provided for the public. The existing campus is situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses particularly single-family residences and small commercial establishments. The campus would result in the intensification of the church use. The applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan. Short-term noise impacts from the initial construction of the project would be mitigated by existing code provisions limiting work hours as well as the applicant's construction miitigation plan. The landscape plan submitted with the application includes the use of screen shrubs along the eastern street fronting side of the parking area along Morris Avenue. Additional landscaping is proposed to be provided throughout theperimeters and interior of the parish campus;however the Code currently requires a minimum landscape of 10 feet be provided along all street frontages. At this time the portion along Morris Avenue is proposed at five feet in width and there is an area along the portion of Whitworth Avenue on the north portion of the site that is not to be vacated that is less then 10 feet in width. Staff feels that an appropriate recommendation would be to require additional landscaping be provided so as to not lose any parking stalls. St. Anthony's Catholic Church aacntion/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 5 The project will be required to complete any necessary street and utility improvements. This will include water mains, fire hydrants and payment of utility system development charges. The applicant is aware of this. Staff recommends approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the site plan that has been submitted and proposed by the applicant,which is based on Council's approval to vacate Whitworth Avenue. Staff recommends three conditions of approval including not constructing the rectory off-site,revision of the site plan and landscape plan to maintain the on-site landscaping as proposed and the addition of five feet of off-site landscaping within the right-of-way portions adjacent to the sidewalk and phase II of the project be completed 10 years from the approval date of the project. Staff rescinds the condition that the applicant not use the Whitworth Avenue right-of-way to construct the project. Nancy Bainbridge-Rogers, Cairncross&Hempelmann, 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98104 stated that she is representing the Archdiocese and St.Anthony's Parish for this project. She then submitted a hearing brief St. Anthony's Parish has created a 20-year master plan for renovation of expansion. The current application covers the first 10 years and two phases of the master plan. It is intended to accommodate existing parish members and school students by renovating and expanding existing cramped facilities to meet current codes. It is not intended to grow the parish. The applicant does support staffs recommendation, it has taken a long time to get to this point. The applicant is withdrawing the rectory proposal at 215 Whitworth Avenue. In regard to landscaping,Ms. Rogers stated that this issue has arisen because the Code actually has a five-foot standard within the parking lot requirements. The 10-foot landscaping standard is within the Center Downtown (CD)requirements and could arguably be applied to where there are actual buildings and not parking lots. This is how the project was designed. The parish supports staffs recommendations. Bill Rutledge,Rutledge Maul Architects, 19336 47t Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98115 reviewed is experience as an architect. The 20-year plan was completed in July of 2000. It was developed over a series of meetings with the parish as well as neighborhood meetings. They went through a fairly extensive process to examine the programs and other activities for the church, social hall and school. The school is for Kindergarten through eighth grade and has 520 students enrolled. Most of the uses in the plan are not being changed. The school will continue to have only 520 students. The parish size is not expected to increase substantially over that period of time. After developing the Master Plan they focused on phases I and II. They also received feedback from the neighbors and started through the street vacation process. As a result of a series of meetings with City Council and two additional neighborhood meetings,the plan was revised. They have acquired two additional pieces of property to the north of the doctor's property which provided an additional 31 parking stalls which brought the total to 230 stalls for proposed phases I and II. The parking lot off of Morris Avenue will have its entry off of the alleyway. Bob Herman,Herman Traffic Engineers, 15324 SE 133rd Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that he is the traffic engineer for the project and prepared the original traffic impact analysis for the street vacation in November of 2000. He reviewed the differences in the project from the original plan to the current plan. The existing site consists of a primary area where parents park to wait for their children in the afternoon. The problem is that the areas fill up very quickly and there are vehicles spilling out onto Whitworth Avenue and onto South 4th Street regularly during the afternoon pick-up times. In comparison,the proposal increases the parking area on-site and provides more of an access length into the parking areas so that any spillage that does occur, occurs on-site and can be dealt without effecting the adjacent street traffic. The morning drop-off has not been an issue. The proposal more then doubles the current number of parking stalls. In his professional opinion this will decrease the demand for on-street parking. St.Anthony's catholic Church Haaition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 6 In the new proposal the uses will remain the same as they are currently. The expansion is to accommodate the current usage. The number of students is not expected to increase as a result of the proposal and in the first two phases the number of seats in the church will not increase either. He does not project any increases in traffic trips to the site. One of the biggest benefits of the campus proposed is that it eliminates pedestrian crossings of Whitworth Avenue, Morris Avenue, and South 4th Street. Currently,the children must make these crossings to get to the gym. The proposal creates a much safer environment for the students. Mr. Herman prepared an addendum to the traffic study prepared previously, analyzing the impacts of redeveloping the area. Greg McNabb,Pastoral Assistant for Administration, 314 South 4th,Renton, WA 98055 reviewed his responsibilities with the parish. There are currently about 2,350 registered households as part of the parish, which is probably close to 8,000 individuals. There are 520 students in the school,which includes nearly 340 families. About two-thirds to three-quarters of those are parish members. St.Anthony's was established at the corner of 4th Avenue and Morris Avenue almost 100 years ago. It has been in this location and growing since that time. The process for this current proposal began about five years ago but he has been involved for the past three years and is best suited to answer questions pertaining to the past three years. In developing the Master Plan they invited those within 300 feet of the site to a public meeting to discuss the plan. Several neighbors attended and offered feedback on the initial plan. Discussions with the City on the street vacation issue began about two years ago. After discussion with City Council one year ago and a subsequent meeting with neighbors they made changes to the plan and realized that parking was a major issue. Last winter they called another community meeting and no neighbors attended. In regard to staffing,there are about 20 employees many of which are doubled up in offices. They do not perceive an increase in staff in relation to the additional space at this point. Gary Teale,Principal of St.Anthony's School, 336 Shattuck Avenue South,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he is in support of the plan that has been submitted. The students enrolled at the school are dealing with inadequate facilities on a daily basis, as are the teachers. This plan will allow the expansion of the facilities to provide better educational facilities for the students. There are also safety issues. There are approximately eight to 10 classes a day that must travel across three streets to get to the gym. The plan also provides more security and better control of access onto the campus. Kathleen Fraker, 7222 SE 135th, Seattle, WA 98178 stated that she is a parent and a coach for some of the students at the school. Having to walk the students across those three streets to get them to the gym has been stressful. Mike Borte, 11254 SE 190th Court,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he is the Director of Faith Formation at St. Anthony's and has lived in Renton for 20 years. He is familiar with the downtown area and feels the proposed plan works well with the downtown Renton neighborhood. Arlind Buzz Johnson, 334 Wells Avenue South,Renton, WA 98055 stated that he feels this new plan will take the focus off of 4th Avenue and Morris Avenue and shift it west towards the parking lot. He feels that this proposal will be an asset to the community. St.Anthony's Catholic Church adartion/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 7 William Flynn, 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE,Renton,WA 98056 read a letter he wrote to the City Council. He pointed out that a church in the Highlands has just gone through the same type of scenario and so far there have been no transportation problems. Wade Cross,322 Morris Avenue South,Renton, WA 98055 displayed a drawing with a circle around the church to represent the'parking pattern that happens currently and will continue to happen. It is his understanding that the school has a procedure to be used by parents dropping their children off but it is not being followed. The circle depicts where individuals would intend to park and part of the line actually goes through the campus where the new parking will be located is much further away then areas where individuals currently park. His opinion is that this plan will not take care of the parking problem. There will be parking eliminated on Whitworth Avenue that is currently overflow parking for adjacent buildings. He does not understand how the church could be a draw to business. He does not see how it is benefiting the area. He also stated that he cannot see that this plan is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is attempting to prevent sprawl and trying to concentrate intensity of use in the downtown area and how can this project be defined as doing that when spreading the campus across the street. He does not feel that this is a community resource. Many of the parish members are unable to send their children to the school because they cannot get far enough up the list. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 stated in regard to the lost parking on Whitworth Avenue that the parking that was on Morris Avenue that will be going down to 4th Avenue was going to be available for general parking during the times the church is not using it. Ms. Rogers pointed out that the circle drawn by Mr. Cross includes parking areas that will be provided on the new campus plan. Another issue raised by Mr. Cross was the loss of spaces on Whitworth Avenue,the application andIthe staff report reflect that there are 112 spaces considered existing for St.Anthony's and that actually includes 15 space on Whitworth Avenue. Those spaces are being replaced elsewhere on campus. The new parking lot will be stripped, landscaped and far more inviting as to where individuals are supposed to park. With regard to compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,there is a lengthy document included with the application materials setting forth the justification for the Conditional Use Permit,which goes through a multitude of Comprehensive Plan Policies that are advanced by this proposal. The no trespassing signs on-site are clearly to protect the safety of the school children during the day. Principal Teale;stated that the no trespassing signs were put out at the request of the Renton Police Department. It allowed the Police Department if there was inappropriate activity going on in the late evening the right to arrest them at that time. Individuals are welcome to use the recreation areas as long as they are not destructive. Ms. Rogers stated that individuals currently park on side streets because the on-site parking is grossly overcrowded and circulation is very difficult. The new plan streamlines the circulation through the site,which is one of the goals of the plan. Ms.Nishihira added that there is a footnote within the Center Downtown Development Standards that allows for some flexibility with how to accomplish the required 10-foot landscape buffer. St.Anthony's Catholic Church .._.'ition/Renovation - File No.: LUA 102-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 8 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:12 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant,Archdiocese of Seattle(owner),for the St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation, filed a request for approval of a conditional use permit to expand an existing church,renovate and add facilities. , 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is generally located around 314 South 4th Street. The majority of the subject site is on the north side of South 4th,between Shattuck Avenue South on the west and Morris Avenue South on the east. Whitworth Avenue currently runs through the middle of the site. A second property is located south of South 4th Street at Morris Avenue and its existing building would be demolished and replaced with a parking lot. A third property located at 215 Whitworth Avenue South was proposed as a new Rectory building but the conditional use permit request for it was withdrawn at the hearing as part of a development agreement reached with the City Council. (see the attachment) 6. The subject site is zoned CD(Center Downtown). 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban commercial,retail, service and urban residential uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes churches serve the needs of community residents. 8. The eastern portion of the subject site was part of the original town site of the City of Renton in 1901. The western portion was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 156 enacted in May 1909. 9. The subject site is in the middle of downtown Renton and is surrounded by a variety of commercial,retail and residential uses, including single-family uses. The subject site is outside of a"parking exempt" area and is required to provide parking per code requirements. 10. The subject site is a slightly irregularly shaped site that jogs around some third partyproperties on the north J g Y g Y p J g p p and east. The subject site would incorporate a portion of Whitworth Avenue South and a portion of a north-south alley east of Whitworth Avenue South. The subject site would be 216,576 square feet or 4.97 acres. 11. The subject site is flat. St.Anthony's Catholic Church Audition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 9 12. The subject site includes the existing St. Anthony's main church, school, rectory building and supporting buildings on the main campus. The main campus is located north of South 4`h. The site also includes a social hall that doubles as a gymnasium. The social hall is located at South 4`h and Morris Avenue, south and east of the main campus. 13. Commercial uses are located north of the site and most front on South 3`d Street,the main commercial street running west to east through the downtown area. Commercial uses are also located east of the site and west of the site where the old Kmart store was located. South are residential uses and the railroad right-of-way. 14. As indicated above,the applicant has requested the vacation(VAC-00-003) (02-054)of a portion of Whitworth Avenue from South 4`h to the east-west alley located between 4`h and 3`d. They also requested the vacation of a portion of the north-south alley located between Whitworth Avenue and Morris Avenue (not to be confused with the east-west alley). If the City Council ultimately approves the vacation request, these areas would become part of the campus and be used for buildings, parking and other internal purposes. The City Council has entered into a draft agreement with the applicant that requires the applicant to abandon its campus expansion beyond certain boundaries and requires the new rectory to be in the main campus and not on a lot outside of the specified main campus boundaries. The applicant would dedicate property along the south side of the east-west alley(south of South 3`d)to widen it to 24 feet to improve circulation with the loss of Whitworth Avenue. 15. This review anticipates that the vacation will be approved as it includes plans for development over the "to be vacated" rights-of-way. Staffs recommendations also anticipate vacation approval except as they mentioned the off-campus rectory proposal. As noted above, at the hearing the applicant withdrew the plans for the off-campus rectory. The development agreement called for structural support for additional stories to apparently allow vertical expansion within the campus boundaries. 16. The proposed renovation and expansion will be phased. Phase I would include a new two-story addition to the Parish Ministry Center and new Social Hall along the south end of the campus. It would be located over and east of the vacated portion of Whitworth Avenue. North of that, in the center of the campus would be,a new gymnasium. Near the southeast corner of the gym would be new two-story additions to the school, designated as kindergarten space. The upper story would include office and meeting space, staff lounge and youth ministry,choir and art rooms. The existing rectory would be demolished. The remainder of the buildings would remain as is. 17. Phase I would require the demolition of the existing social hall south of 4`h and the development of a 75 stall parking area. An additional 150 parking stalls would be created within the boundaries of the new campus generally north of the complex and south of the east-west alley(south of South 3`d). An area in the northwest portion of the campus will serve as play area during school hours and provide 69 stalls during other hours. 18. Phase II would provide a new school facility immediately west of the gym and north of the kindergarten space. 19. Phase III would involve school expansion but is not part of this current proposal. 20. Phase IV would involve expansion of the church but is not part of this current proposal. 21. Phase I is proposed to start later this year after all approvals are final including the street and alley vacation. The applicant estimates it would be completed in the summer of 2004. Phase II would occur St.Anthony's Catholic Church :ition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 10 between 2002 and 2007. Both phases would be complete within 10 years. 22. The church has been in this area since the early 1900's. The applicant does not plan to appreciably increase any of the services they offer. The expansion is to accommodate the existing services and personnel in a more comfortable fashion. 23. The CD Zone permits structures to be 95 feet tall,with 65 percent lot coverage, and setbacks of between 10 and 15 feet along streets. The proposed structures meet those requirements. The two-story buildings will be approximately 32 feet tall. The buildout will result in approximately 35.6 percent lot coverage with a footprint of approximately 62,205 square feet. There will be the appropriate setbacks. There was one instance where the setback would have been five(5)to(7)feet along South 4th but that has been recalculated and rectified. 24. The use is a mix of uses with varying parking requirements. Churches require one parking stall for each five seats in the assembly hall. Auditoriums and gymnasiums require one stall for each four seats or 100 square feet. Office uses require three stalls for each 1,000 square feet. Staff calculated that the proposal requires 225 stalls. Redevelopment will result in 155 stalls within the main campus and an additional 75 stalls in the location of the old social hall, south of South 4th Street. 25. The applicant has reworked the school bus access and parent pickup and drop-off circulation to better accommodate flow on the campus and around the campus. The closure of Whitworth Avenue will alter some traffic patterns in the area but the vacation is not part of this review. The ERC required a pedestrian route through the campus to connect South 4th Street and South 3rd Street. The applicant has provided such a connection meandering through the campus but avoiding the school area for safety reasons. 26. The applicant proposes screening landscape materials,mainly pyramidalis, along Morris Avenue to screen properties across from the parking area. Street and ornamental trees as well as conifer and shrubs are proposed along other perimeter areas as well as in the interior. Ten feet of landscaping is required along all street frontages and this was not proposed. Staff recommended that it be required as a condition of approval or incorporated into street plantings. 27. Other churches in the area are St. Paul Ministries,Pilgrims Rest and Christ Scientist. 28. Residents in the area are concerned about impacts of the church,particularly traffic impacts. As noted above,the street and alley vacation are issues before the City Council and not part of the Conditional Use Review. Conclusions: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36(C),which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; St.Anthony's Catholic Church tiuuition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 11 e. Parking,unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates churches and schools in the community. The Comprehensive Plan also envisions urban services as well as economic development. While the proposed use will not generate retail sales,the school is an employment base. In addition,the Master Plan for the church demonstrates a concentrated and vertical,although still low-rise,campus,which is appropriate in an urban downtown area. 3. The Zoning Code permits churches by conditional use permit. The code also has height, bulk and setback requirements as well as landscaping requirements. In the main,the proposed use meets all of the criteria. The plans now show compliance with the appropriate setbacks. Landscaping will have to be supplemented. Compliance with the Fire and Building Codes will be reviewed when a permit is submitted. 4. This office does not generally review community need for churches. There is no way to judge whether one or another religious denomination needs space and facilities in any area. The fact is that this church has been a fixture in downtown Renton for nearly 100 years. 5. There is no doubt that the existing church has impacts on the surrounding community and that an expanded church will continue to have impacts. But the proposal will route more traffic into the campus,will provide additional stacking or queuing space and will provide substantially more parking. The Development Agreement also limits the "off-campus" impacts by specifying the "growth boundaries" for the church and eliminated an off-campus rectory. In addition,the church is in a downtown area, a commercial hub and urban tumult is expected. The Zone would permit buildings up to 95 feet tall,which could have more substantial impacts on the surrounding uses. 6. The majority of the campus will be two-story buildings which is compatible in scale with the surrounding uses including single family homes which can also be two-stories in height. In addition,the campus will observe a 10 to 15 foot landscaped setback, helping to soften the impacts of the complex on the surrounding streets. 7. The applicant will be developing additional parking resources as outlined above. Parking for approximately 250 vehicles will be available on campus and within a block of the church. This should help minimize some of the impacts felt in the surrounding community. 8. Traffic circulation will obviously change with the vacation of Whitworth Avenue and the alley but that is a subject reviewed by the City Council. The applicant intends to better serve the school and its parents with more internal circulation. In addition,traffic has been routed away from Morris toward the arterial streets. The applicant will also be widening an east-west alley to provide better circulation adjacent to the campus. Some circulation issues will obviously crop up after the vacations are approved but the City will clearly St.Anthony's Catholic Church Aaaition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6,2002 Page 12 monitor those issues. 9. The applicant has designated a pedestrian route through the campus to help neighbors reach the shopping arterial of South 3rd Street and substitute for the closed Whitworth Avenue corridor. In addition, school children will be circulating on campus rather than crossing streets to get to the gym as they do now. 10. The applicant will have to supplement its landscaping and meet code requirements. Staff shall make sure that landscaping along Morris Avenue actually serves to screen the adjacent uses. 11. The church campus is expected to have ancillary activities in its various component parts but staff will have to determine if they are permitted or require separate permitting. The primary purpose of the campus is education and services and their related facilities. 12. The applicant will be phasing the project over approximately 20 years with the first two phases intended for years one to 10. This seems appropriate although it is hoped that the turmoil of development and redevelopment does not strain the neighbors for a continuous period over that extended period. Decision: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The finalization of the street and alley vacation. 2. The applicant shall execute and be bound by the Development Agreement. 3. The rectory shall be on-campus and subject to further permitting as required. 4. The applicant shall provide code mandated landscaping as determined by staff. Staff shall make sure landscaping effectively screens along Morris Avenue South. 5. The Conditional Use Permit shall be null and void if the vacation is not approved by the City Council. ORDERED THIS 6th day of August, 2002. 4.U- FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER St.Anthony's Catholic Church riauition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 13 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of August,2002 to the parties of record: Lesley Nishihira Kayren Kittrick Archdiocese of Seattle 1055 S. Grady Way 1055 S. Grady Way 910 Marion Street Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104 St.Anthony Parish Nancy Bainbridge Rogers Bill Rutledge 314 South 4th Street 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Rutledge Maul Architects Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104-2323 19336 47t.Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98115 Bob Herman Greg McNabb Gary Teale Herman Traffic Engineers St. Anthony's Principal, St. Anthony's 15324 SE 133rd Court 314 South 4th Street 336 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Kathleen Fraker Mike Borte Arlind Buzz Johnson 7222 SE 135th 11254 SE 190th Court 334 Wells Avenue Seattle, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 William Flynn Wade Cross Rutledge Maul Architects 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE 322 Morris Avenue South Mark Stine Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 19336 47th Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98155 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of August, 2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100G of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,August 20,2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14),days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation File No.: LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H August 6, 2002 Page 14 Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,August 20,2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • a APPROVED BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT Date ?f jS/20t7 2 JULY 15,2002 • St. Anthony's Street Vacation/VAC-00-003 (Referred April 23, 2001) • The Planning and Development Committee recommends approval of the proposed street vacation requested by St. Anthony's Catholic Church subject to the execution and recording of a development agreement which addresses the following issues: 1. PARTIES. The parties to the Development Agreement shall be the City of Renton, the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole, (the "Archdiocese") and the St. Anthony's Parish(the"Parish"). . 2. APPLICABLE PROPERTY. The Development Agreement applies to the property informally described as follows and designated as: (A)multiple parcels bounded by, on the east Morris Ave. S., on the west Shattuck Ave. S., on the north the alley between South 3rd and South 4th Streets, and on the south South 4th Street, and • (B)multiple parcels currently developed.with the Parish Social Hall located at South 4th Street and Morris Ave. S•(the.`Bounded Property"). The Bounded Property"lies within the Center Downtown District of Renton, generally bounded by on the east 1-405, on the west Shattuck Ave. S.,on the north Airport Way and the Cedar River,and on the south Houser Way. The Development Agreement applies to those portions.of,the`Bounded:Property"owned by the Archdiocese. Formal property descriptions will be included-with the Development Agreement. 3. ADDITION TO APPLICABLE PROPERTY: The Development"Agreement will expand to cover any property within the Bounded Property that is acquired by the Archdiocese. 4. VACATION CONTINGENT ON APPROVED BUILDING"PERMITS. The approved street vacation shall be contingent upon the issuance of approved building permits that are consistent with the site plan approved for the campus._ 5. LIMIT ON PARISH EXPANSION AND ACQUISITION. A. St.Anthony's Parish will limit its development of church,rectory, school, and social outreach uses in the Center Downtown District to the Bounded Property. The Parish will withdraw its current proposal to remodel a home at 215 Whitworth Avenue South for use as a rectory. B. Nothing in the agreement shall prohibit the Parish or Archdiocese or other affiliated organizations from acquiring nearby lands for other primary uses, including but not limited to residential uses, senior housing, low-income housing, and nursing services. C. Nothing in the agreement shall prohibit the Parish or Archdiocese from holding title to additional property within the Center Downtown District, including property acquired by gift, donation or devise, so long as the Parish or Archdiocese does not seek land use entitlements for church,rectory, school, and social outreach uses for • any property that is outside the Bounded Property. D. After the completion of Phase I,the available on-site parking for the parish will have markedly improved. 6. VESTING. A. City zoning and development standards, including but not limited'to parking requirements and permit procedures,will be vested to the date of the Development Agreement for the Bounded Property,with the exception of any applicable Uniform Fire Codes,Uniform Building Codes, and other regulations pertaining to public health, safety and welfare. B., The City agrees that future phases of development generally disclosed in the 20 Year St.Anthony Master Plan(attached), are appropriate for the Bounded Property, subject to subsequent detailed permit review. As part of a later phase, the Master Plan indicates that the portables will be removed from the campus. C. If a policy,zoning or development regulation is amended that eases development requirements within those boundaries,then the Parish/Archdiocese unilaterally may opt to apply the revised regulations to future development applications. 7. STRUCTURE DESIGN. Phase I and II development approved for the site under land use application file no.LUA-02-054 shall be constructed with appropriate footings and foundations capable of supporting additional stories pursuant to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City. 8. TERM. Term of Agreement is 40 years,but shall terminate sooner as to any portions of the Bounded Property that the Parish:and•-Archdiocese sell. The Agreement may be amended at any time, and the:parties will specifically,agree to a good faith review of the Agreement for amendment upon the 10th, 20th and 30th anniversaries of the Agreement. In addition, if the Center Downtown,zoning designation is to-zoned to call for less intense development,then the parties will specifically agree to a good faith review of the Agreement for possible amendment. The Committee further recommends that a draft,,Of the, development;agreement document be reviewed by the City Attorney and•the Development Services Division prior to processing its approval. Environmental (SEPA) Review, a public hearing before the City Council, and the adoption of the enacting resolution are all.requiredprior to the`recording of the agreement. The draft development agreement shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Committee for review prior to the public hearing.. This street vacation for St. Anthony's is fact specific and shall not set precedent for any future Council decisions. (6(;tit g 6 e — Ar2 _ Kathy KKolker-Wheeler, Chair • T • ri • hair • King Parker, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts Jennifer Henning • Lesley Nishihira • • • • • • • • {� _ . -, - I -r-J-/.7.-.I 1 1. - ,P i Si/ / • 't/� , / A ` RR .`1 G- :AVE.. • S. ....: 5e _ •, • 11 B' ell3 PL' U N , �, I,[ 1 ,'0t ��/.Ail/ �1 • 1 V+ YIXJ ~' 'n 7., a LAKE a0-AVE H • Lam. . f _ �1. miii iii L' by tom, .i /,: : o ` air, ' �� +� j s„ I '_, i� 11' i� p �'. 141�'17 a?�-a ' a l .. 1..K' Films{ (� /` .4 i 0' SHAM//( '- •AVE. ti, ~ 'z' ° °1 6y if a®r A - •_mS`a g„K a.n4' itl,,, ::3%,. — ------______-________' i RE .- ..m a.. ltip FAA , .:".-' � 1"" : } —/Ati =---------------- siAi• • tlVH/TWORTN �' J l if, , A. $ q,.ii (�� +r �l" ,, ,�r1t`Y� y �i r' [ia'o.'Artql�� y I i/-y •1 et 11 181.F a2222'2222ir 7�'._ \tiEliP ` '14 �'{`4'it.P .di(.E�ll im F AVE: /® � AI C s .21 P3 9Chhd .a.r.,tyr 1 15 s 1 "s !I-a -w tr ao ,- y E, i `;! _ 1. SM/THERS *- AVE. S 1 1 �IR 1 3 1:F�IJ •Pi�'L ' ri��' DIN I �.< 7rC a gG l n4€ 6 __ LOGAW ••YE . ' ' . A i'/ ■ iA:yVil 1e1 ar g co, .{ ��rrE�I- A314 -liggigliiiURNT AVE: I S. . . ! II o •o 00 aSa 0 o-o n n � 0 a 0 i$i i Conditional Use Application for s' Phase I and Phase II Expansion of M rma St. Anthony Catholic Church E . 3 6 Son..W.8155 §i Z 03621111 Renton,WA • Ulimi I I 1 • I . 1 • ' ••• . • ..- • • . ....., ..ON APROVAL Of WHITWORTH ROW VACATION.6;466:16.1.16.UST PROPERTY . . LINE 4.-0-TO THE SOUTH TO WIDEN DUSTING ALLEY TO 24,0.TOTAL;MOTH EXISTING ALLEY 20'R.O.W. m$. . .,..s. .,...t SOY 3,2iI .255.• ,1.1.1-1,001. . ..,.. • -5 I .... . . .. _ _. ._ . - . -. • (....) i 7 TT .. . L a) D ... • , . . • - • , . . 1.71.1.00. --. > .0 , EXISTING PO?TABLE a_AssRooms I t • • i •• • - . • TO 1.IMAM° Y •< d O 0 1 ...__. . . .' . . 2 24 " t :-• . , 0 • . .. PLAY AREA AND - ! 3 EXISTING BUSINESS . Oc ° •in" g -- -• PARING FOR 50 . _. -- -C 1 = . . . C 1 .74 ' . 1 L1.2,.. 7...6. ., 76cr . .76.,....... • ., 66 ,,, WO- , 24.0- , WV : 4 t i7-.1 • . • 7.S.. , • it< P:I..4_.c0 / . . 'Cii 0 e,- . . • . Q, . • ,,. ,. r, , . , . . . . .. . '!_': • a 1 ....r • ...... L . 6-1 , . " -0 TO . : 10 10c 10c 10 Si, : • . ' .. ,- ) 8 ' ( --- - ..:. . s '. . ..... s,6 , .• t- •. , , ! b PARKING FOR 29 • '—' / FIRE LANE PLAYGROUND&PARKING FOR 19 CARS AND VAN (MP' • - ROE LANE AMIE GAIt 10 af clOSED '• COMO SOC..2tOreS i I: ....I...II . ' b 7, it PARKING FOR 52 CARS • T4 COMPACT CARS \ MM.mamas T01.00.10./Mti _ _,1 : CZ 0 ACCESSIBLE STALLS •°':',.::*-7•"-, . ,-OM.KSIORICIS I s i, 2 Acrtvm! . PHASE II PHASE I ,••.- . ! ID BE...AD, • I •4. I • ..t. ' ft r Qi13, ,,,• • , ..- . . '1, \ .• r, ' • ; . . . • 4_, • .'•‘',-,.„..,..,..0,••• :, li• , .• ,4 Dil. 110.4."E•-E a.---44 fa.MI 3- a••s; `r, i.7,-- ; 1 . UV, 2.1.4. D < • _ .._ ......,, ,,,_... .....Ivrii........ isiVeMininlililaelligir ir , _75..MtV,E1F- ANIMMINO -.M7Pk110161111,_ I 0 -1-- __ f "... 61 ; *I.N..,1 ''''•:. - , , !:: ; i : . Cn • • s So , I Cr) i ' .1 12 : •i I '.- ; -EASING (1)t • . gr:XL6Ps'irsal:r ' reFOIR0 WWI CII WIWI, • t,::' FIRE LANE VACATION itt. BUSINESS _..." > mime. . I AT M.I1Det.LOW, PHASE I • NEW GYMNASIUM II :--' TV 3'.Ere. I . L'' ,AA1101.00,7•mar 22 ; •'°-' ' ' " ' 6 ACC < § ' I. PHASE II 1-17 • . . I. i ...., •:,, <CI • Mr • NEW SCHOOL FACIUN i '-'Ar-i(k''I 4;. 1,..:-; P'- •' ' k''' :(%•-•'• - .. .. ; A 41 ' '•I•••÷...! , , I •• ,tr,,,,,,,,I mor -••••• ri .1 [ . MAO%MUD ; t.i ACC WAR,. Zjilti": t i - .• :t i : lisi jI (....)•-0 EXISTING 158 SCHOOL 0 ,. [0...M009•294. . ' . - . ! 4. : -L---- ,T---.1 fr--4.1 • ': • L . _I ...._. ...___ ___. , 0 ; • i • , 6) 1 E:Ili D 1 MAN ROM t 39 IS .5251' PHASE' , ; . ' 1 i ' ---- I III • • ; NEW MNDERGARTEN : -O:LABSROOMS ' ' : " :: • '.. 51. . • . . ., • , 1 . IIME , MAN ROOR•MT re...1J•Lemma',n,trri; A 1 ,., -- I r . ' • to BF REMOVED I / p I —— I . .. .__'2.22:14 9,=_BIHF 0R•_..9. C D ., EXISTING CITURCH • • c...........i._______i. • ,\ • . - •-• ; FIRE LAVE WIN ILOC.•Mr A, -iiii/ . . •PLAY COURT; . 5...i, . '''fi PHAiE I ! I C 0 .; : . W1171-BIG TOY. -..1- 4,e, i,PHASE 1 ' _ . .• \S.: .._ I__ .1' r-,'"-• -"......., NEW PARISH OFRCES • ' -1 ro.o crivrwIAVII t. 0 - -1 . NEW SOCIAL HALL ....IMO/•sur .,DRONtYfft.0....1. 1 G. . .. IIt 1--"-{It .'• II ' r k r Di. • . • - . • • 0 'A0.4Z4.-...••..../a EXISTING PARISH MINISTRY ' _ . . " ' 0 i ' ' :: ,:9':: f i '° EXIST"K,-15,SCHOOL !. G.:1.!!!!.7.V CENTER - •• :. 0 °: • t • ErtitalItOOR-23.23. i -7 "7 . • ':-:,,...1 iggst171. 1.01Irril.00,1210. ••. .: KWH ROM•37 Yr . .•..,It: .1" • VIVI f MOP.45 Or — 1---WSW.41006,V .1 n 1 I 2c • ...5. ; TO III REMOVED i tiO 0 .1..II ••,.. .. • .i, I ' ' I .. .. ., 11:4'1' ' • •:••.• . • •• I 2 , • ri------I•r-----.n Il -,„ ,...,, • -] -,_ a lgi 1-7! 0 •.••,,...,.,...._,,, ,_.,, • STAFF, :6, i I •••1* 0 p•:‘ 1 717. PADS KW OWN vac nata ii • • Cit•I tCI7 ,I I •MUSCAT ! 1 t I I_ ..F.,•,, ,i v , . . .....,, rt.Int>' PARKING .. I.•4 ; i.t:', 1, / ° . owl... .. .. .. . -, ' cSIDEWALK ..• ./ ''''.... `'...... T 1- r ••:•! :/.. •,. 1.1or . • .. . , ... - --•-•_ • 4, /44907-LOCA.,/OF , 'I I II . . • IL; . .44.- ' DIIINGILECIIKAL -.:s i I t.. • t .. ,... VVV -' . ., ..., . .. I . ..... • if. ,. . . I South-4th Streeh........ , .,.... .... _ ._.._ ____ ,....,,:-...,., ....... .. .. ...... 60'R.O.W. I ,, ,..-•••••. ;•••••• .,, . ‘• - ••: • ::•;... ,.-. .....:. _.--,1 "I'' ... -Y:.:,•••':-, ,' . ‘.1 • / I'‘,,44,‘--.tk-...r---i .? :: •• ; ••..; , :I ! .4-- i.,,,a' N'•-1.-;i- f 1 ... , • • . . 11---)- = (---, i, ,, , . ,.. ,,.• ...._ - , ) ( • A3 site plan 'A' .imill,.•"1.,....... 0 •:, •,,,• X, Kr 4,3 ea Ct Project Information _c , Site Address or Location Parcel Numbers '` Proposed Rectory. 215 Whitworth Avenue South 7841800090 >✓ Renton,WA 98055 D Proposed Parish 314 South 4th Sheet 7841300035 • Campus: Renton,WA 98055 wo U 7841300120 SOt71h-3f eFStreet - w G 7841300120 7841303105 O='9.y () 784131b100 7841300090 7841300080 \ Site Ptan'B' 'QW Sheet A4 7840800050 Q C" 7840800065 I °7840800070 , P U q Lolly Y7840800110 R\ 0 784/3800105 .-, C --� ° Fi O 7840800075 I O SE Lot(Proposed SE corner of Morris Avenue 7839800150 Proposed U per" Parking Lot) and 4th Street 7839800181 St.Anthony Rectory 7839800185 215 Whitworth Ave S . Project Team Renton,WA 98055 6v1itlD`ilWr`I I } Owner. Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle Office of Property and Construction 910 Marion Street h3f Seattle,WA98104 _ _ _ Sfrucfures Gcant: St.Anthonyarish Exi in ort ble APP 4 0 314 South 4th Street — CI ro rtu o — —[I_ — ❑per ot�e 8 N Do ^Cmtb [j Renton,WA 9MS5 - 2 • Contact:Greg McNabb.Parish Administrator —', °'aO3IIopnn on°�ivv1 A°'""' P:425 255-3132 r Ep�Ypp F:425271-4729 I — a N �8� 734I30at25 Proposed Whitworth Ave hill Architect: Rutledge Maul Architects.PS Inc 1 7841670120 ROW Vacation .. ••- 19336 47th Ave NE Ell Seattle.WA98155 7840880110 Contact Mark Stine 7341300035 7/141380105 P:206440-0330 ,_, 784051:ass 1 71,40,031as 1 F:206 362-4381 a r 54.1: ' 3mim 7ea0eotam YO ♦ Site Plan'A' ``i;'-%' 7840802036 x Sheet A3 , CM Pacific Engineering Design,LLC rr/Engineer. 4800 South 188th Street.Suite 360 :13amvo rr/ ,�� Seartfe,WA 98188 1 "al See Plan'C' ��•� • r3Contact:Lou Larsen Sheet A4 P:206431-7970 F:206431-7975 f._. Landscape Glenn Takagi Landscape Architect Architect: 18550 Wands Way N..Suite 102 • —1— ShoreMe,WA 98133 EzLsrng Church Contact:Glenn Takagi E>dsfing PMC P:206 542-6100 St.Anthony Parish F:2066465277 - 314 South 41h Sheet - -Existing School 76393001so .. •Renton,WA 98055 °on"' Existing structures to be 1 /��777�•�•r• �"m Electrical Abosseln Engineering A replaced by parking ✓ 'ylvamlel / Engineer. 1844 114th Avenue NE Bellevue,WA 98035 P:425 Contact Jay 72 Werner 1 � I// P:425 941 � F:425 462-9451 7e3mo/ • Contractor: Shinstne/Associates L _ J P.O.Box 1370 Sumner,WA 98390-0280 Contact Pat Oda ' P:253 770-5858 F:253 770-5277 Campus Plan Al a 40 to. rise Ito MP No. City of Renton P/B/PW Department ' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 9 of 9 The proposed primary use of the site, as a parish campus, would include a number of accessory uses, such as school and sporting activities, day care operations, seminars or counseling. Staff does not have enough information to determine the frequency and number of individuals that may be present during these other church related activities. However, it should be noted that non-church related assembly uses would be outright permitted in this zone. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The proposal would require the demolition of existing structures and the construction of new buildings. Additional existing structures would be maintained and continued under existing uses. The proposed rectory would convert an existing residence to a residence/church related function. While staff has recommended this component of the conditional use permit be denied,the renovation of the structure would require building permits and compliance with the adopted uniform building code in the event it is approved. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The proposal would be required to complete any necessary street and utility improvements, including the installation of a looped water main, fire hydrants, and payment of Utility System Development Charges. These specific requirements have been forwarded to the applicant as part of the Advisory Notes prepared with the Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M) issued for the project. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation, Project File No. LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H, subject to the following conditions: 1. The renovation of the existing structure for use as a parish rectory, located at 215 Whitworth Avenue South, is not approved under this conditional use permit. 2. The design of the building, as well as the site plan and landscape plan, shall be revised to comply with the applicable 10-foot street/front yard building and landscape setback requirements of the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan to eliminate the use of the Whitworth Avenue South right- of-way as part of the parish campus development. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and may necessitate additional notification and review requirements, if determined to be appropriate. In the event the street vacation is approved, the applicant shall submit revised plans that comply with the aforementioned conditions for review by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The project shall complete phase II of the parish campus within 5 years of the date of this approval. In the event any portions of the project have not been completed within the established timeframe, a new conditional use permit must be granted for the additional construction. hexrpt t '...? \3 • • I 1 1 1 • " • • .. • . . • .,..., . . ON APROVAL 09 WHITWORTH ROW VACATION.tail 6i6 AIDJUST PROPERTY " • LINE A.0 TO THE SOUTH TO WIDEN EXISTING ALLEY TO 2443'TOTAL WIDTH • EXISTING ALLEY 20 R.O.W. -C INEO • -C . !, 0 . I I . . .- . . I I 0 N °) I 1 ... . , . . • 1 D • DAMS 3•330MCI ,.._ > ..0 1 • d . , i ,.... 0 .c • I I 0 EXISTING PO?TABLE 0_ASSROOFAS I t . .. i . I ' G I .....-. . • 2 ... I t o b EXISTING BUSINESS I .2 0 1 • -i I . PLAY AREA AND . . PARKING FOR 50 E .:..- ....2 ''' 1 I 1 1 _ . _ . • . _ . • Cs. CARS • 7< I . . . .• • . . 3113.3•110.1 I 13PM13 31017 ........-.....--.--....... . ,._.„_ 4 i I I . 2 ; I L' • • ;-; • . b • L' , Cl.\_.7__...., 8 .---.... 10 • . . 10 10c 10c 10 e..' . • . . • ` i . •- V10,11.G3111 ION c1.03131• . . . ! b PARKING FOR 29 • '"' C I PRE LANE PLAYGROUND 8.PARKING FOR 19 CARS AND VAN ('ttir) , FIRE LANE OWING 303001.133 1 ,,. .1330 334331C11013 I . ' L' ' L 31,331130 3/390331C.33 PARKING FOR 52 CARS • '7. COMPACT CARS \ MU.0354113.3 _ . 2 0 ACCESSIBLE STALLS • •"..."'./ e ' ff. r F,_ _, . __ i-, PHASE II PHASE I 1. 1: 2 ACt I ' 0180010 "0 0 Or :@ • • . J 1/4. -4- • , s ,i . . ...,. c \ . • • • . • . . • .2 - *•15- (k- i ; ; ; ; ; c?- a a--a G...-13 19.tfil I3- la\ i 1 r---- • -Tr 1.4 .„.., [2,11j$ , , . . , - - -Ar1/ 0 . afgenAt ,.. ; __ _AlktwgrAmamo•R. •ei. c.,., Id,, Iry , 1 p•Ir .. vro. , sto• r -i-- D I < . ,,_.. 0 I -1-- IE c , :: : b. M39.31 Jr W 170 0.3. (.1) Cr) ea ; ... , f. d1 I. * ( I KLOCKI HOBO9 EXISTING ". . . 331113. 1193 3..3 MO EWING 1 ;.'..;I , PAW. 3010330.MOM 2 Hi WALL I .31 ,..1..330111 i, BUSINESS (Ii0E3333331310.1113 3.3331.3W / ; .31 3131113334,10CAIION PHASE I IA 1 . - FIRE LANE '"; I . F3 113/1.0,31,3 NEW GYMNASIUM I __ , ,s9r,,,',079... . •`'".., 1. i ..., .._6 ACC,.., < .• ...Moon.a.,a r : . § . : . - " I. PHASE II • ` f '..• • v: ;;‘,.!-• ,..6),- ... . P11.•Yr 69.W iapoy -. CO e ... <C5- j I 1 . NEW SCHOOL FACIUTY ! I • .9.! ; :,I„„,*„,,,.. 1 • ; ! e • „ACC:333,13 1 • .1 I ,I ) • • , .. I I I I. MING PAVING 333.10V3.3-13113 • .• 01. i---- - • .• ' !C:40/ l't '4():C22 1 ! . . ., .1,I.7 ' ' ! '._i....._ • '• I . .1 0 l< s..., g EXISTING K-8 SCHOOL '. 3.2.1133000•A 43. i • . . • • i I • ,1 ! Ili) I , . I 2 1 Eli :3 g 3.1.1330011.33 I Y 133311113004•32 fl• PHASE I . __,.; : ....,,,,, da, 1 #7,n 1 • •-IS- : NEW KINDERGARTEN 1 CLASSROOMS i '.-.ia'• • • • . e I I 1/431) I 1.1.111000•333T 1.11439110C31.4f 31 r=-4•1.--i n.er•-•1.ii. o - ;%Pi 11' o • . im SE 4.---J ''cIT'sr'rct"c* . • . , I Cil) ;. . .ge: . . , . . • (. 41.P 92.-9-. ..): EXISTING CHURCH -• • e FIRE IAIVE WM 11003•33 3T A,.%V. . .. PLAY COURT: I"?c".' • q PHAIE I I C WITH"BIG TO\ . PHASE! LI NEW PARISH OFFICES " 2 1.3311:11314LV;re• : .. . I NEW SOCIAL HALL ET tr':'• L . • I ..e.N.00.33 3T .- . • •-• •t .... lyk:" 0, . • • d",,,... 9lUtt„.: "-I • 'rk i 0• I (Piii.Ft, EXISTING PARISH MINISTRY • ,. • . . . 00 ., : I;T2 EXISTING K.8 SCHOOL • .....re/,,i.elt:. CENTER .•. 313.131.0.1•211.2V 1 ' ,. 4. 1 1 . i'. a •3 ••,:115. il.3' ••..ar , ... 1.0003 fIC011.MO MAWR...,•37 317 ---a)j , 4,7gr" . .. • . , x. ; 4,4 141.7' 1 ----' ---- ' . 1 ..4 I • .- • . ' . • • • .t.,,wito .. . _ ,_ • • 0,-9, 4 -.1•r --- •I 1 JJ 0. 1 . .. a.12 07 .\t KW C14.3111.1.11.1.33 0 36MM GAT 10 I. 1,1F• .,,d...--J\,' . ... 1 1E7.9, I ,. •• ' / 36.M.Mora VDEWALK •.".,i ''''''''4"'""' , • 7. '.- ••'.•: ,.. •• I NIP' .-.-.-- • • ".••.".'.."' '.:'•:; ::• •. 3.333,01.LOCADO4 03 , 7 MONO 111.3VITCAl i I i i ... .... . ... .• 3313.3.111.9.103230133 • •1,• • . ,. •• • . - South-Ath-Street .........„ .:••••• •,...., :• ,.• 60 R.O.W. . , . .. .. ......., ,1 7•:,.: 0;- . ... 1,....,....._A .... .,. ... .... . ., ..... 4 ... :,-..\,.:,•...92 1 ,'" '.7.." • .- -k-. . 4 ::. " . "" ., zr 4.: ' : 4...• 0 ••.•• •• .-... -..._.., ( :•:_•.- yi 1 A3 ... 1 -1--)- = (:_is ,.• /...' 1. ,e . I - 1 . site plan 'A' ... me ,........, IP )2...\ tad) ..t.-.. . I ,/562...„.:::- FIWY.T0IP.8.••••••°t pril...i:1;41 •s cc*t'...il.5. '.;::1; .' F.1-..",li iiE'i ..——IL/6 90• — 3 3'3''3.3''3 ;.%I!1 f:3:'r Parking Summary Etsiteg.33300 Rectory School nargro.nd. Site Area Calculations 20 Existing Ste flee 59 Proposed Ste Areo Main Ccunpus SE Lot Rectory Iota% 154.462 20.463 13185 196.315 174.723 n/c n/c 216.576 -C 0 - 3" - Soc.Hal Lot 18 StrliMil• 4.0.7tr• Dbploced Padang on Whilwalt7 15 Wing IMPewlous 120.324 20.939 3.134 15Ct367 D 30 Addltianal IrriceMau3 18.731 1.105 3.254 22983 1 i'ail li ti ti Z: Total Existing...0 - 112 Total Impels.. 145.055 22014 0.388 172457 r . - T--- / --— -So uth-atittr-S-i-reet _ • AM...M..0g R0Q1.1110a: New Gymnasium Social Hal and Area Addlnonal &Ad.:1E001min,Area Stotts Reauded Lot Covorage Percentage 62.255 0 3.544 05.749 35 6% 0% 20 5% 50 4% 4.0 0 i.lvi.- 60'R.O.W. Meath's room atom Hal to be removed: 15.285 4.65EL inter.,ParldAg Landscaping 1.174 920 n/a 2094 taw = a..9. 0 Total Addbonat osse/Mly are.: 10.627 1/100 SF u 105 Landscape AM Proposed 22011 4.003 0.997 34.596 AddltIonal Parish Adm.: 2400 3/103357 9. ''' '— .4 ,,..., / ••t-q!i'l '\\ N119,10/03W scar 4. .....,,. ....i..'.5'1......"4,015rPoa AT MMHG : 43 Total New 0013 Required. ghe school addition NA not add staff no employees.)..113 Zoning Requirements zone:CD-Urban Center Devon 0.,,,I Allowable bulding height 95.0. t=1-'..CZ ...0 ›,..< Proposed buldtng height 32,T g v_P '• PS I.-stt• Total geastred(extbing Om°di:Monad feciudece•-.........•225 SW MSS" %, " '••• .g te . 'i . "I Buldng Setbacld Required. 15.MA 25.may front yard for burtangs <'-'6) Ti e . Proposed Phase 1 Paildng oyes 25 Met In height. se j:. 8 Main Campus: 155 10 loot landscape dr.tectuked along .I i 19 ;Pal j, 12 ," ' Forrnet Sockd Hal Lot 0•E lof): 76 aneetS ittlIlislf iii 3 3 Total Proposed Podding: 230 72 r , .%::" ''.l.'' ' 4.. ,l'-' '46:... ,. :.,fr.s.... ,, =1 .2 8 --•—• ,, ,,,,,... ---. .1 ••••* ...:..-— C 4....fl.a:• 'T:.11''/.11'':•i'. • , -• ....1 ••••• '. g (1r: 0 .i .. . 12c $ liTSIt' .. D j :5,,,,..• -- -: t .. C < 0 . 1. .,...,-_1.. ato. 1.i... .Y.0 ' 1 Jzq l' \ - - Cl) i . ,. .. i PHASE I COMPLETION $ , , . ' ... > • x .T.417a3.f.012 II CMS Aliii ri-..1': .‘" • - C.a....25.0 STINCIMS `• < ' / 4t SoS -•- ., I•-• (r) ' %... ...I --•--- / ' • 4 l' t 0 ? riarar -v.,-j.a,,.a •S, -. , j. a.`11..``'•'''''''• 2 I 0 PO ,,, • , 1 E 114 kilditei.s 7.,.. ... I \'t .....,,..... or., ic - ...__. II COljt'eor,,,, \ 1 ....._. 7 R 40 \ \\'". . 1 •>, -,C6-04 In \ Atiggp.,.:C!IT*WA>IrkE u:T.. VAMPIRE EAsErAtArl. s , 4 RECOADING MIA.I ......'',I.'b.,1" . •. • ISMAI \ 'I it Er• \ • jr.",......;.......,,,.../?,14, .‘ ., , \ ......:: _.----------- al i co 0 : ,, • , .M. F iltj't•- k 4.s • ,,.-. ....,'..---- II - ST 4,iliti 1 ; , Ill Itio. i '411411111115. i_T Inipiljt.,,.., &...1%*. D . 1111k .- "Ili 41114..."111!.. . 1 c'' 't filiTlit. Ai+. HMI!,4•I•ww3$ • e . 1, ''' .1 amilliViii .441, U-I ... Pf..I 6 If010 ::=,g g r•.1 ‘ St.CP* . will = - lim.- .10 > • Or..Oa ..... ik. i • < ir, . M 1..cn Daft ••••••••''''' imr.is 411".• F- a 10.., 129S_ED ADD Cli.. i,,,,_.,.., 'AP' 0 „...----- a im, C;.1. ...------ - - • I .42o =. a 8.9...... isa \ . 14 Site Plan'C -SE Parking im•I'ml=.16......... 0 Site Plan'B'-Rectory ..."mmemlmilimaimmmm 005 0 A41 0 ttIr 20 30 4. 0 10 2cr 30 •P • No. .....S/ • ...A. tA PHASE II PHASE I MO' . , r PV. rJ-•-IE1 fill • ri EI •-1:1 0 ,/ .I •11 m iii ' L, m .. _c I 7,71.. y,u,...,,- GYM STORAGE j I PE .I .„ ti e 0,,..../ ... ,..7....A 2 . 1I H1111111 1 B f • I ,,=. 1 2 ' -- 1 ..I --- I'--I[ ' . n. 1 t. 11- • ) P 'I 1 I — 4-in p-- OFFICE I I Ili .<.-. . I -- f I I ' 2. 7,, ...,, 1 I 4; 2 1 , • .. m W ' AA I i I. ape OA,qii ; s ... i i 1 ,E ,9 >•• 1, ORKROOM 1 I ,_ ... S 11 I - i 1 ( 0 :::.r•-• C 1 ' I _ II KV, I i 1 GYMNASIUMIWO]1 SCHOOL ; E 1 cm i ,.--!' u-re r ADDITION I i i r -Cs n.; .nr"T Til 1 111 2 2 -I•• I 0 , 1" ." 1 •: I = 1 1-2 I 'i 1 I.. ' I I < VA 1 I 1 , - •..., -----------------, — ; I . 112:111141 ;;Illi 'ill LI ' I ili .' r--- 1 , l • !I , ' 1 ., I.- - I .e . I I a. I C NURSERY 1 1 1 ; 2 I STORAGE • 1 e PLAYGROUND .. 1 ; e 1! K-1 K-2 1 Y ' I fa' I \ I .....• ••— e nmoluzintli • , ..„g ! , , , - :1.i pit..0 t.-7 j 1----1 111.,1_(-H i 1 pi Amon II , lEigik i , 1 I I i . . I GL I I 1 ' j I NURSERY ,1 CHILD LIT. 4. =NE STORAGE li e 1!i.IN III!Ili I i ATHLETIC &BRIDES Litre I i!.I I e:NIL.11111:!II I '• ‘ al ! 1 I Ie.1 .' . I • STORAGE , K-3 Alli, ;, 1 1 tt 1 1 I IIIIIIII I ;I " 1 111'11'1' 1 Ilf 11 I il i ilk.1il 11li, iIII1 I ' I ' ilL .,1 1 41 •1 it -Ht )i Hill Hi itilll „L .„L— ' - SERVING ' . . ; , : 1: I I I i I' - _ ---- . . • . . . _ , , 6 r-- • ' ' ' I 1 I I :, 01 wc,R,,R. I.' EC EPT 1 1 A. G c--- 1 il I j 1 ". FP - PMC ADDITION 7.,I1511_kin ,•• i ' LIBRARY 'f ,ii igii 14.11 i . 1_ 1- 1 7 1 rn . —' • OFF 4 OFF 2 OFF 2 OFF 1 I.-I I It1'''..r • KITCHEN i elli, il e• II -11 M--7.7r—'—r—. "-"--1 tl I --,, ..7, SOCIAL HALL 1 r SIMS CO. H- 1.Ili 11 L.,1111:- 1 :rlilk . I..% I 203 1 M. M ...• I , .'' ELECT 1.5 1 I EXISTING PMC ...0.. I . t) .--I I r-••• -L„ I „„„ 1142602 1 1 1.T.-' AS'". ff . ki _,L",r • TRASH 11.1a1NG IVESTSJU I. . Dirtn I ....Ail 7 i 4.. --- -----''—- --'- -- . -7\ r-- 1 ST.VINCENT „) I -- 1 STOP t f _ ./- . ---- [_ _1___ .... ... 224.. - 1 . .NM' ... "- I Main Floor Plan mgmlimlmi.... 0 A5 0 , 5. C? le. 37 • C;SI' • 1-61 L OWING IVSEACOILA blIVERIONECIL AL LIAOL.ANOWska, van.. COMP 51INGal PAINLIED/AUL COI,. L.0 • MAW SNCOOL Ma CM •Cal....... .0-1C.511,C00 I. amor wall WM.ACCRLES LAMS Ow. ..`a 0 :ill I,I..1; • 1.11C.51,M0 I L. _ •1 - - , ' o 0 , p7.rsi _15..o.9:5..;. B3 Eli En Eij FEBEE ,-,...--, - ,- .,. . , ,--7., EBEHEBB]imEa. m 8.zz i. I.= -• • . • ;-,-- ( Li...,9E11 000 000 ,...,,, 1200 0 -• . • . . 110 - --- — ,4 ' aq .-( -1^ • 1 .,-:e2,-. ......-.44,- :.-t.....- • • 0 x 0 11 cl.•....11 .:11 ...-.... '"-". ".". ":"..9E1 1,,1:1 . . ElE1 tr.4 Z ,...< -•- °,-.4 -1..- Pi• - /INIM . IiiiiMtiliginWitiiiiing rraakiiiffattliMIMEMAgfar_ gi-Ei! •. tff r•lilliMlifillriaakiff-eil•ff:TR Y.',M,T.I'rM41t4fi.-r-.",ff..-14,ii.iii:.•„:•.4o;4;A i•_:,,-,-,,ei-!,,,,.;‘,- .,.,•.,•, ,, ..,.;,: ,r . . I ¢•-• Mai GRAM WONG GILA. 43) 'i ° g • Existing Church Raised Offvewcry Ond , Scrotal Hall ond Meeting Roams •• Glo •om:Wu. • Now Salo.AcOnIn&C105105 • Map.Off/Laxftig .... 79-Cf. 0. • O4 North Elevation C 1:1 .2 g > . •__ E ,n,,COLOCO Lt.1 1-. • mow Cellie TO BE "CI itY SCIONLOBVPALLAPFTwALL E 2 0 PANOLMOTAL GCMG ...AY ROMA. il OXON.*.KO Ma.. DAINGLIROLORGAZ u f., _c 1WCLIONE5112.0 COWL 51.011.5 ; ./4‘..L. - FACED.. MOD ONG. \t Li Loa ED MEM MLING -I-- C . .51INGILED BOCO OR. , L • •:IA: ..' :11: Ell ::: OM M _ELEL.--E111 . . . ' •' 1 ME M f'''''," , Q : ER -, -1-- k• II.11 MI . cn___,...: . , • - HE.. ,E 1 '' ''''"..4=''--4 A 2'-'-'Ill''' ---------7------li EEEI ..--..4.......„„ ... __....,,L, 1..a2....t .1 . 11 . .... , I L -,. ' •. I X ' ' I I ...51, _ __= Mr. 4,•4t tL. fr,.,7'5:.,,.:'..'' fft.'. -zit4-. ,',.• . •f 1.; ,• •-•,, •.:'-',.•:,:"..,:,,':g Li Tr . . • ''"` 7 I M.G.. OWING... ows..o. foam GRADE Iowa GOCOLLI FACE Cm/ Now School Ad.,&Classes Dating P M.C. Social Holl and Meeting Rooms • Gymnasium w111.1.1.ACE ACCFN15,• , • • • e West Elevation East Elevation(From Raised Driveway) I a ORNANIal SYSTELALOCAMO IN Voloo LOS Owa . earn,ash.cove. C.CrAi•=°',!,,,,,,__ _ ,,,r000000.00111%.4040 1 E hig IWCMONL STUCCO NMI . MIME MEM . El3 Ei3 11 " ..• ... , . ., , . _ Is- ...• FF1=1:1 1 •--, . 61 4A-1,54.4v..g-krstl" 4•:, .01g.'•gT-Att itAtl6q-.ttg4i';'"ii;?.,:fi-‘•':. i'''','-1;•''J,:.;::;;-.• School Classes • Parish Office • • Y Section at Mechanical Loft(South Elevation) ELOONGOLOLACCTA IWOLANCAL MOM LOCATED wnow Lcrtsma DARK.A.OLOGLAn COWL OLINGLES MONO 1.0 MO,MMHG DAM.. AV6 ROOF ortalk.0.111O ME1AL MONO ilELSLASS 0.05.16.5. ONGIOLLE auCCO ammo aux CON. IveGIONL MGM MING Minna 'WI.. ROO- , IWG1OLO 511LCCO • . s ........ / ,NV4711F O... ..• . • . 1 "..' --'-- ....•, . - t O. .... tiL • ::: B B B El'181 ,. 148, 8 0 B 51.11 B3 EEI 133 EEI 1::111111111.P 1121;4ln cillipfiq• - • . . • . .- • .... . . — • •• ,.., J.:. ., .. : .. . .....-- - ; , , _ (.-4_,kimall arm'war .,'' ROM • •. . IMO- ----- El .\tit 2 p, _1- 2 1..,'•MN Il• I`7.14 r---- . .'. 4.nil MI -5112,•Albi.g••.,:I.. i•UU : ' ' ._:. ••iti.,- -a!ki:i,, •-a • . .•• • et I . Ei. r.r.' ,-.._. B Illir am. 'au am 1 it .. .. .... .........„.„. - ;‘, 6'3'"'''''' .;-•:',. ,-- •Al- -i..:1.!."-• . .1...., _ . . . MOM GRACE Wiwi Cloves• Dating P M.O. Patel Office and Meeting Rooms Social Hon Raised Ortvewoy and • Wing Chutch.ff Dhoplafff Loading South Elevation(From South 4th Street) Building Elevations 1.../11 ,..111............ Al 0016. 2e 00 ee r-- kAl PHASE II PHASE I -. - - - nra• . . Ix, / 0 III \111 ---11, III.. OPEN I 1 1 .- . GYMNASIUM MECH _ I . .0 .6 0 4. = c.., 0 BELOW 1 _ II li II II 'k. • g .. 0 _ .- . 1 1 i u 'D kj 6 , ) CHAPEL 0 , I , LEARNING .4_ C RESOURCE CENTER :.; 8 ila) 0 I . I Ii GYMNASIUM -I— t . BELOW C = COMPUTER LAB -I--: B-9+2.6rti% -i/l,4,41,1. .--„.,•,,( Cn STORAGE ,..," 11 .•! •, ,I, ,I,!, ! i (FUTURE CORRIDOR) ';., i i`i i !i!I I I I I I I NrEEMCM7137ErIT a. ART , I I / -I i 1 Pal . . . ... .. 'II litirlill 1.- .. . YOUTH lEnil i .,, „ ,d,I OPEN — MINISTRY I ..!II.--,.,. I. BELOW nFIAP ROOF MUSIC ROOM 1 i ill:Ira! III'J. STAFF LOUNGE MEETING CHOIR PRACTICE I 1_ iri *' I' PIP am i-I P• I I glipi • I V s I ,i'7"—` 1 1 , 111 11.1-. HMI Id 1 1 1 , HIGH.... .I. + LI-N- 1.1',.. . . - I • 1 ' 7 I I 1-7 I 1• _.- CEILING H I MUSIC STORAGE 1111111:i. , YOlf111 MIN WORK RM ' OFFICE Wal Lt.1 ,l111 - Id:=1 - I , I I" 11 MEETING MEETING . • d i `.2 E., OFF 8 OFF 7 OFF 6 OFF 5 1. . ,r4.1 i'64 11 il I f !I '-'-' {L ' W03011 I 001.13010. I, I KITCHEN MECH Off. _A 1.11. 1,..n.I 313 . I WI li 310 --- LOFT HIGH CEILING AT / .... IL'.tri. I 1'\ lit. II I ill, _ 2". / 1 II ,,-i--. . SOCIAL HALL "FLAT"ROOF ,,,..,,,, .3,..,123 WI* 0.0.13310 as 01.3302..10. 7,17" ROOF I..I. ' ‘I il t.1 1./1 ‘ 1 , *71 / 'hit BELOW Tout Qufl323 ail 'I:C' - .7'''. r ;;F:- P ". - 'FLAP ROOF . 1 '..; . . .D_ .... -- _ ... • . .. .........Fur-------- -------- 1 WV Upper Floor Plan 0 .,...7=. , 32. 0 A6 • 74- • •• ... „0.1......(1 7 L • N., � 1 r i O U pirplimigk . . . ..... ,:::.-f:...:,:;:-.,,:7::::::::::::,-..:-....:,..: _ ,.. i. ..„.„,......,::,..„..„7:,,,:„....„.,,,...„::.,.,....:„ .. . .4 •. . .,...;,,,.,„„.„2„,„.„:„.i'....'„:.'i:'...„,.,,,, O a u- ■■ ' -. ) WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION' 51 O M. va..0 -I- • • .r:nisron.xa. 11'1:17:;:::.;'d:'i1:',:,I I I44-I—I Q -'P a r: j —_ ...::: ... x.....:.. .... .. .:•. .roe CA ..,:: -:------\_____:..z.zi;.'•::•,,4,.:,.:: :•.:.1c..:- .:vi ht a ... +yr.0 u:1 r _ aer wca SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST ELEVATION 1 II r I rt j., 1. z 01 ;1 a 1 1 1♦♦ /1 I -_- L_-__J L`T'J Ehil r �N asY aow rr21, / t :r •' �1 1 w:me. �-, ® ��//li �� '' 04 I III / RI! i d) A .,„. 1 Pram ty M. CII I • I —L �—L •/ ♦` i' . SECTION rA A L 4 Nib MA 1/ AMA Ya.i R. V '. /ate ,`— J MO >.� , EXISTING HOUSE FIRST FLOOR PLAN • F,,,.,, 0 RECTORY REMODEL&ADDITION A9 • s fl • L- D t South 4th Street C.....)PLANT LEGEND G E N D $wnboj• Plant Name/Remarks A o• q. qo 0 Existing Tree • ,.. x'w:,• / Proposed Street Tree 3 • ¢ k t. o y av i g�4;:f �'�:�Ornamental Garden Tree 1 U n. �Z _�` Narrow Conifer Tree ±T 19 PHASE I CCYP1E1CN 12 9:. Screen Shrub(Pyramidal's) ,..., c i",. f i k • vxmc,u IS MS riu... Ornaental Shrubs/ Grounmdaover Beds • tti ir& • Lawn +-' • Iw;4 C 12c It Q { 9 N_ x. Cr) . {i > 4 � 1 Q P% 440 S.F. e v s:" p ' —2443 S.F. � ••0 Sr � ' S ;a/ N itsol ;K eta • i a,' 2' 6 702 S.F. „ Gi' le g t.•i 22014 S.F •G. ,.., v.w LAND. REODI'.... 11.,SF. •• PROVIDED.49,SF. • 485 S.F. r. ().- • �� T[PiE I ... . • • F. i f Tr MVO • Landscape. Development Plan — I p.o .�� SW1 �, Parking Lot (phase I) N eo' 1. Key Map • Not T.�. L1.0 -Q 0 • • :,a.— O ER TO MUST FRIFFRTT LINE 4'-0'TO TIE 6ail0 To • I _ PLANT LEGEND U •' ' ■OBI E0SOIG MILT TO 24.-0' T�EDTE 11�� alley �/ •� gl. Plant Name/Remarks • '+T •••••• e 0 Existing Tree U + IIIo • r""" •• •• fi'. N 1 Proposed Street Tree �• CHAINUNK FENCE It:A '-c •�_l Ornamental Garden Tree' . RELOOIED:VIM•• ••.: I!'r r- Nei:..e-GenFter-Tree ' O PxAg P, ,@,tI o *„r ENDING EIR 65 :,. Q AODIDONAL CARS -•:• PUT AREA MD 'L 3 ^�- ® Screen Shrub(Pyramldolis) "� a SOWN:. ..,,0 FOR . 1',: 0 oz �r.r. CARS 1312 S.F. i. Ornamental q GroU drover Beds $ 0 1 xjl' Ri ISED DECORATIVE .7 Qari 1 �7 , I PAVEMENT Lawn A7. ....1., WW1 8L 10 10 toe 10e 10 ��•/� A dA 0 �. �� yI\ TOO S.F. ,101 S.F. PARKING FOR 9524 OF.PKG. -I-A PLAYGROUND te {,�� nee4 SF.FKC 29 LANDSCAPE FE01JwnD 411 OF . FIE LANE FOR i CARS AND NC .��("'D" '�� PAAXNC FBt LANDSCAPE f�m11F1ED.D�9h I LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:1106 SF. ACQ39WE STALLS BENCH IAtE ��,�.��i . 1174 S.F. 52 CARS LANDSCAPE FRONDED:1406 SE. ) CMS I +`-• 2 ACC 1�`•.` A 11 Q tt i�� II•o.iln..to iGi_eli�:9;^'.iii:. ;ice. feu r 6' A. I_� moor--'••--•I.lair•�71t7r1ri9..11iir.R ;i. 1106 S.F. l c. N. ,mI�uui rnig•24, ` a.■ I 4A:j >-fgd:: a dry -,vas am NUN 1 • R1131 ,h' FLAGSTONE PAVING (/7 NETTIIII .EMI .. a: :'s , cu SCHOOL I ..■ _ Q LI FAOIIIY L: il hI 6 ACC .....,v......a..,...,:•,.... 3..3 MEN 6.q 8.• a.ti,. &&, &At:. g ",I .: =e:v_ .. 1■V43 COSTING LANDSCAPE 07 cLon t fr: id ir.41�4 TO REMAIN ■ EXISTING SCHOOL 11 ICIIIIIII��1i1111111� 'WAWIIICII' t hi• �� a f � yyyy 1, ��AL._ • �_s1 CO— y mar �� > 1 meow + � NFwSOLIAL1NMl =_�,� ., ��:N, ♦`�:� e .0 'a•� GYMNASIUM AND J� �.I yL: , ■r,}.•�N�... aptCULPTURE DA. ..fARISII OFTFF :♦ v •.• CC OCU BOLLARD CONC.SEAT it-11:0 _ _ `,--,..:`--'•1•-__. • EXITING CHUR°I _ WALL 1 i:a::ia:_.= Cflll III lll �' � ,•� �`_ ..♦ `yf' '.a 1 .e'y2,7 l. 4 ...l , CONC.BOLLA"D �7�� _ 1I�J�G� SCULPTURE OR +Y .:' s 1 �r `• • ` 6'0'O.C. - \� FOUNTAIN 5, i?i G.4.c 1� 4'..•.... .,"• �.�i`.' ( t or ��. �O +e�e.;a:: •� RAISED DEC° TIVE e,* •,� °� .. ••-• 4 '4:: di PA ENT l// A3 iii!,I.F.,------,- MIMS . ..... ''''''44v:.41"'I a I a MillikiViii - - - liT 111 • 3L14'�'H.:, Tja.1 I' '0.— .=I;::: ' Y. Jill o �� 1•' t-- we - - •I...r...a ��`yp--': .0=.' ��' ESST S DSCAPE •INC 4.- q I gt4.1,.. -$,� pI°'•e+.w'wcnll'r=r EXISTING LANDSCAPE -• BENCHY l9_ • �❑TO P. .. 5l.P..: & : Y .. �~- ' „a zt TO REMAIN ai y1A.. 11P. lI " 3 yr:-' i.::1''.T":.`•_..._i^: ...,. -.AS:-' •��r:;X.., r xas.sa,ao • .I�"' AIN Mat MUT .=' SIDE* O .. /'% � � OEx +i .. .....,/ �• , mlif, is• ru�o..santa`�•w PLASTIC SLATS... 4, EXISTING STREET -. PROPOSED STREET TREE TO BE ar,°e tai/AvaT main campus ' t"P'� So h 4th Street TREE MP.) RQA°6° ••a • \ 1 • Landscape Development Plan - Main Campus (phase I and II) 0 L2.0 North •r,ax _ _ i • 5O • Shattuck AVE S 1+ ii f Q .. 5 I^_ W • r I it �' , _ 7 Q fir + 11 WI 303 11 (� a I }1. 7• )4.2'; 0 ! P _ i jaw w. 'nitt 1 tor ii CDice— •::: _ .... ig II- 1_0•jilarr:::.,..:.-17.1.t..k. I . sie imi, aletf 5:I' —13 .414 Whitworth Ave S y � � =�1�%1� 1;::.' 1 . I Whitworth Ave So. g i _...;11r �:: • I ,..sti;:,a,.a•uMMU.; iv Ir it ii u�uC•11n z g Ai 8 l 0. • ';Hump: Pb 1 y1re1m P � I4 .::t _ 4• .„,n: Ss pf i — .►`♦/F\♦A7 /�., ,' .-r .•.:'R — , p. • n 2 y'v l.Y w ,� • - g - qi it III ._ 1 1 iii; _ tf lie m . _ € i � o a I ' 64 c Morris Ave S Norris Ave So• • . . • • . ( • • :\ , • w . r4OA 1 t a • .:'`R.:A1::il?:ia..c� .)1..icN...:>t•.(i)Y..:il>...iY.:i)>., • 7 if, i 1 """"•'•w'm"w Conditional Use Apppplimitless for tw . 1 rma Phase l and Phase II Hxpasseion of o a ts lief r It1 0 .r., ..,,,, St. Anthony Catholic Church 8ii8 0WA 044O�IAX SWAN 0 AMON,WA • ✓ J CSC, 11✓ July 8,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 271 Karen Zammit,Renton resident, spoke as a representative for the Committee to Save King County Childcare Program, and as one of the 45 parents who lost their childcare subsidy at the beginning of 2002. She stated that King County is suffering from a budget deficit and is cutting human services funding. Ms. Zammit expressed her concerns about the families who have lost their childcare subsidy, saying that there are not many childcare options available to them. Stating that it costs$215,000 to subsidize the 45 families for one year,Ms. Zammit asked for that support for 2003; and while childcare funds are still available through King County, she encouraged the City to provide the 50% in matching funds required by King County. In addition,Ms. Zammit asked for the City's ongoing support in creating more childcare options within Renton. There being no further audience comment,it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC BEARING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,reviewed a written REPORT administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2002 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Fire Department's Fire Stoppers Program received nine referrals of children involved with fire setting, several of which were related to potentially serious fires. Three children were determined to be at-risk for setting fires and were referred for counseling, and the remainder received education and work assignments. Fire Stoppers is a nationally recognized, countywide program with trained interventionists who screen children for risk of future fire setting. Evidence of the program's success is the reduction in the return to previous behavior by juvenile fire setters. As a result, the program has been chosen as a model for FEMA's United States Fire Administration Juvenile Fire Setting Education Program. Development Services: Lande Gregg Zimmerman,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator gave a Feed Site,Building Collapse briefing on the partial collapse of the north concrete-block building located on the Lande Feed store site that occurred today. Displaying photos of the collapsed building,he explained that the east wall of the building and the roof are down,the north wall is leaning, and there is damage to the south wall. He reported that the building was declared dangerous in June 2001,and was red tagged for no occupancy. Since this is an emergency situation,the area has been taped off for safety reasons and a portion of Burnett Ave. N. has been closed. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that the owners of the Lande site are working with the City in obtaining permits for the rat abatement and demolition of the facility, and rubble will be removed from the site staring tomorrow. Responding to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding the partially demolished building located north of the collapsed building,Mr. Zimmerman confirmed that the building is also to be included in the demolition. AUDIENCE COMMENT The following people spoke in support of the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation Citizen Comment: Various— request by St. Anthony Parish(VAC-00-003): John J. Barta,26001 119th Dr. Whitworth Ave S Vacation, St. SE,Kent,98031;Arland "Buzz" Johnson,334 Wells Ave. S.,#221,Renton, Anthony Church(VAC-00- 98055;William J.Flynn, 911 Lynnwood Ave. NE,Renton, 98056;Bryan 003) C72- b 5(1 Whiting,21310 212th Ave. SE.,Maple Valley, 98038;Mike Borte, 11254 SE 190th Ct.,Renton, 98055; Carlo Desimone, 24612 102nd Pl. SE,Kent, 98031; John Casey, 13921 SE 241st St.,Kent, 98042; and Gary Teale,9046 Dayton July 8,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 272 Ave.N., Seattle,98103. Speakers comments indicated that the parish is a Renton asset and has a positive economic impact on the City; the parish reaches out into the community and assists homeless people;parishioners patronize local businesses such as restaurants,car dealerships, and medical offices; the parish is creating,building and expanding,not deteriorating like the Lande Feed buildings; the school serves the community far beyond just the parishioners; and the parish provides a long-term public benefit through the education of its children. Speakers also commented that busy streets surrounding the school endanger students,and providing a unified campus will increase children's safety; the proposed vacation will diminish the impact of the parish on the neighborhood; and as the parish continues to grow,it will become increasingly difficult to find meeting space and classrooms. Other support comments indicated that the proposed vacation will not increase parking problems but will add additional off-site parking, will not increase traffic congestion and will not limit driving options in the neighborhood; and the proposed vacation will create a more amenable parking and pickup system for the students. Citizen Comment: DeMastus— Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton,98056,described illegal Fireworks Ban firework-related accidents involving children, and expressed her concern for the children of this community. She stated that the subject of banning fireworks was brought before the Public Safety Committee last year and nothing has been done. Ms.DeMastus requested stricter enforcement of the laws pertaining to the use of illegal fireworks, and asked that the City review the fireworks issue since other cities have banned fireworks. Stating that this is a difficult issue, Councilman Clawson confirmed that the matter is in Public Safety Committee and the Committee is waiting for a report from staff. Citizen Comment: Johnson— Arland "Buzz" Johnson, 334 Wells Ave. S.,#221,Renton, 98055, expressed his Spencer Court Apartments, concern for the safety of the Spencer Court Apartment residents when they use Use of Adjacent Alley the alley located behind the building on Wells Ave. S. to access the parking lot. Citizen Comment: Larson— Ruth Larson,714 High Ave. S.,Renton, 98055, expressed concern about the Renton Hill,Unsafe Use of truck traffic on Renton Hill, saying that truck weights exceed legal limits; truck Streets by Trucks &Damaged drivers are not following traffic rules; and when parked, trucks are blocking Sidewalks roadways and driveways. hi addition,Ms.Larson displayed photographs of damaged and hazardous Renton Hill sidewalks. She asked the City to investigate these two matters. Responding to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's request that the issues discussed by Ms.Larson be investigated,Mayor Tanner stated that Police Chief Garry Anderson will investigate the truck weight and traffic enforcement issues, and Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman will investigate the condition of the sidewalks. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilman Clawson, item 7.a. was removed for separate consideration Appointment: Airport Mayor Tanner appointed the following individuals to the Airport Advisory Advisory Committee Committee: Kurt Boswell,27426 179th Pl. SE,Kent, 98042,for a three-year term as Airport Leaseholder primary representative(term to expire on 5/7/2005); and Michael Rice, 300 Airport Way S.,#100,Renton, 98055,for a July 8,2002 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 274 on the matter. He emphasized that he supports both the Guild and the Police Chief, and respects the progress that has been made. CORRESPONDENCE The following correspondence was entered into the record in support of the Citizen Comment:,Various— Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation request by St. Anthony Parish(VAC-00- Whitworth Ave S Vacation, St. 003): Gregg McNabb, St. Anthony Parish Pastoral Assistant for Anthony Church(VAC-00- Administration, 314 S.4th St.,Renton, 98055; The Most Reverend Alex J. 003) Brunett,Archbishop of Seattle, 910 Marion St., Seattle, 98104; Glenda Johnson, St. Anthony Pastoral Council President, 1216 Monroe Ave. NE, Renton, 98056; Connie Grace, 16921 135th P1. SE,Renton, 98058; Suzanne Donnelly, 18311 108th Pl. SE,Renton, 98055; and seven form letters from parents of students at St.Anthony School. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that the Planning&Development Committee received information from staff regarding the proposed street vacation of Whitworth Ave. S. today. In an attempt to schedule a Planning& Development Committee meeting as soon as possible,Ms. Keolker-Wheeler asked Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes about notification requirements for the meeting. Ms.Fontes stated that announcing the time and date of the Planning&Development Committee meeting at this evening's Council meeting satisfies the notification requirements. Council discussion ensued regarding setting the date at which the Planning& Development Committee would discuss the street vacation request and whether it should be discussed before or after the Hearing Examiner's public hearing concerning the related site plan. Stating that it should be discussed prior to the Hearing Examiner's public hearing,Ms. Keolker-Wheeler indicated that she would announce the meeting date under New Business. (See page 276.) Added Correspondence was read regarding the use of fireworks in Renton from Mike Citizen Comment: Various— &Valerie O'Halloran,4420 SE 4th St.,Renton,98059; Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Fireworks Ban Harrington Ave. NE.,Renton, 98056; and Audrey Ogilvie, 1033 Sunset Blvd. NE,#21,Renton,98056. Comments included: the need for stricter enforcement of the laws concerning the use of illegal fireworks; the recommendation that the Public Safety Committee address the use of fireworks in Renton; the request to ban the use and sale of fireworks within the City limits of Renton; and the request that the City only allow public firework displays. All letters contained examples of improper fireworks use, and examples of the impact fireworks have on residents, animals and property. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Lane— At the request of Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler, an electronic letter was read Renton Composite Squadron from Captain Ed Lane, Officer in Charge of the Renton Composite Squadron Civil Air Patrol Civil Air Patrol Color Guard,PO Box 1965,Renton, 98051. Captain Lane thanked the City for its support of the Color Guard's trip to the National Competition at the Air Force Academy, and stated that the Color Guard placed fourth in the country out of eight regions. July 8,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 276 Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked for the annual costs of each position. Councilman Persson suggested that while waiting for information regarding the costs of the positions,that Council move forward with New Business. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL TABLE THE MOTION REGARDING THE ORDINANCE UNTIL THE AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF NEW BUSINESS. CARRIED. (See later this page for resumption of discussion.) NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler inquired as to the status of the request Citizen Comment: Price— submitted by Deborah Price,London Fog Industries, 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Permit Process Seattle, 98109, concerning speeding up the City's permit process with regards to her project. Mayor Tanner explained that the delay is due to her own contractor and not with the City's permit process, and he reported that Economic Development Administrator Sue Carlson is working with Ms.Price on the matter. Vacation: Whitworth Ave S, Ms. Keolker-Wheeler announced that a special Planning&Development St.Anthony Church(VAC-00- Committee meeting will be held on Monday,July 15th, at 4:00 p.m. in the 003) Council Chambers to discuss the Whitworth Ave. S. street vacation request by St. Anthony Parish. She explained that while the public is welcome to attend the Committee meeting,public comment will not be accepted. Finance: Project-Tracking Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler commented that it is difficult to follow the Reports costs of a project from start to finish over a period of years, and requested that she be provided with project-tracking financial reports in order to easily determine how much a project costs over its entirety. Transportation: Speeding Councilman Persson relayed a complaint by Glenn Reynolds regarding buses Buses on Logan Ave S exceeding the posted speed limit of 25 mph on Logan Ave. S., and he requested that the administration contact Metro and ask them to slow their buses down. ORDINANCES AND MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL TAKE RESOLUTIONS FROM THE TABLE THE MOTION REGARDING THE ORDINANCE (Continued) ADDING THE EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN POSITION TO THE POLICE Budget: 2002 Amendment, DEPARTMENT. CARRIED. Additional Police&Fire Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,reported on the Department Positions costs of the positions as requested by Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler. The initial cost of the crime analyst position, including salary,benefits,uniform, supplies and computer,totals$71,800; and the ongoing cost is $68,000 annually. Mr. Todd stated that the total annual cost for the evidence technician position, including salary,benefits and uniform,is $64,500. The initial cost for the Fire Department Secretary 1 position, including salary,benefits, computer and work station,totals$60,700; and the ongoing cost is$50,200 annually. Councilman Clawson informed Council that he had asked the City Attorney to review the Department of Justice contract relating to the school resource officers because of his concern regarding the contract language. He indicated that the contract states that the City of Renton cannot use the school resource officers to replace officers that would otherwise be hired. Councilman Parker stated that Mr. Clawson's comments were not germane to the discussion at hand. Councilman Clawson emphasized that patrol officers are still needed, and pointed out that Council needs to look at the budget issue as a whole. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING J U LY 16, 2002 , AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard.; Items will be called for hearing at,the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Fire Station No. 12 PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-056, SA-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review approval for the construction of a 15,800 square foot fire station/emergency operations center. The project would be two stories in height and provide 28 parking stalls. The subject site is located within the Center Suburban (CS) Comprehensive Land Use designation and zoning designation. Location: 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE. PROJECT NAME: Saint Anthony Church Addition PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit in order to perform renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003), for which a decision has not yet been issued. Location: 314 South 4th Street (parish) &215 Whitworth Avenue South (rectory). hexagenda City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: July 16, 2002 Project Name: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation Owner/Applicant Archdiocese of Seattle (owner) St. Anthony Parish (applicant) Address 910 Marion Street 314 South 4th Street Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98055 File Number: LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira • Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit in order to perform renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and nearby alley. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003),for which a decision has not yet been issued. Project Location: 314 South 4th Street (parish) &215 Whitworth Avenue South (rectory) " � , / -II��,�. 9 1 4TRICT �A 1 ff Yam. MJ ��y�rzn m 1 s�.o • D .11:.J7. IQ „ I I 1 �: YY1 I / ry.�. Y. rYI_" 1 d, °i __ 1. Si.'�I se : 1 Itstl + -. ! -" •''^�pr' ' XI L:Er16,•�� "0• 3 MA PM T A o i m' u M o' I Iw,: 1@ my •I I-.> '.'". ®`�,,`®`" 'MIR- .; AIFIgti ! .1,+ ion s NOCKVIC • R, C '"u� S� Fi Tull+!R7 IA,..i..i ... ` ' a fS i r.... i t _, ®1 1 '7Qfr "rmr, —_Proposed Boundary c 1 3RD �- ACB Ic© M.T 1 r-at �e!F,d i Ex ing ProPertY 'AityAi .5 t 1 !-r° y., L! •M7... ' Proposed R.O.W.Vacation n W mfil. �;y t kt: ?r 3 DVS: ,093 7 . Q ir PPE 55• S ` 4TH ST a / ',Munn i ' '�€`h r '��a�Y�"�'•� sou rya r\\ilk 4h o'' o� Qdl. �, t t>c -- , .'p�� b w Gov f.Lol l6 *TA c' � S, �ncai Ilai' o ■ • a S .g```'4s\ �` 4022Aern f t L n rn r•�� •LoFI'M, pia `` '0 .n cPr-�s ' � 1 6It 1 Eer' \` �}J.�7sT�1 �� 1LL ,r ?u a e Q r�rr: CU ra \ air\ U mcsS ,41.1'��4�'1'jeJ S. STH F- : Sf a r i�. 2! llH� 1 + 'WIX, 'c"Ii� \• \ N. i- sae'i ii.I al O''' na+2'r a 7 f33 mttvFAL% \u ' S 6TH Sr a row.* Nieghborhood Plan t 0 ,W OW OW ,on AOn City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,_liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 2 of 9 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Drawing Al; Campus Plan (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 3: Drawing A2;Vicinity Map ((received 5/02/02). Exhibit 4: Drawing A3; Main Campus Site Plan (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 5: Drawing A4; SE Parking & Rectory Site Plan (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 6: Drawing A5; Main Floor Plan (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 7: Drawing A6; Upper Floor Plan (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 8: Drawing A7; Building Elevations (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 9: Drawing A9; Rectory Floor Plan and Elevation (received 5/02/02). Exhibit 10: Drawing L1-3; Landscape Plans (received 5/02/02). C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Archdiocese of Seattle (owner) 910 Marion Street Seattle,WA 98104 2. Zoning Designation: Center Downtown (CD) 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Downtown (CD) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: St. Anthony's Parish Campus, includes church and school 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Residential and commercial establishments; Center Downtown (CD) zoning East: Residential and Commercial establishments; Center Downtown (CD) zoning South: Residential; Center Downtown (CD) zoning West: Commercial development; Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning 6. Access: Direct access to the proposed campus would be pirovided by Shattuck Avenue South, Morris Avenue South and South 4 Street. 7. Site Area: 216,576 square feet (4.97-acres) 8. Project Data: Area comments Existing Building Area: 45,885 sf N/A New Building Area: 47,440 sf N/A , Total Building Area: 93,325 sf N/A D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Incorporation (east half) N/A N/A 1901 Annexation (west half) N/A 156 05/18/1909 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/1993 Two portable classrooms LUA-99-014,CU,ECF N/A 1994 hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department - ;liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 3 of 9 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Center Downtown objectives and policies. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is seeking approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus to be completed under two phases. Presently the campus property extends between Shattuck Avenue South and Morris Avenue South generally between South 3ru Street and South 4th Street and contains both school and church related uses. Under phase I, the project would construct a two-story building that would be located on and adjacent to the vacated Whitworth Avenue South (provided the vacation request is approved). The building would connect to the existing Parish Ministry Center located adjacent to South 4th Street along the south end of the site. The ground floor of the proposed building would include a social hall, kitchen, nursery, library, administrative offices, lobby and reception area, gymnasium, kindergarten (K-1 through K-3) classrooms, and associated restrooms and storage areas. The second story would consist of additional offices, meeting rooms, staff lounge areas, and youth ministry, choir and art rooms. The existing church building, parish ministry center and school buildings would remain unaltered —with the exception of the structural integration of the ministry center with the new building. Prior to construction of the new building, the existing rectory currently situated on the northeast corner of Whitworth and South 4th would be demolished. The rectory function is proposed to be relocated approximately 1 t/a blocks north of the campus to an existing residence at 215 Whitworth Avenue South. The renovated two-story rectory building would be 2,440 square feet in size including a proposed garage addition. Also included with phase I would be the demolition of the existing structures (social hall) on the adjacent parish property located at the southeast corner of the Morris Avenue and South 4th Street intersection. Subsequent to the demolition, the project would construct a 75 stall parking area to be used in conjunction with parish campus functions. In addition, parking areas to accommodate 150 parking spaces (19 ADA, 102 standard, 29 compact) in addition to a staff designated parking area would be constructed within the north half of the main campus area. The parking area located in the northwest portion of the site is intended for two uses—as a play area during school operations and as a 69 space parking area during parish functions. hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department - liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 4 of 9 Phase II would construct a two-story addition to the proposed structure at its northwest corner. This area would house the school office and staff spaces, workroom, conference room and 1st and 2nd grade classrooms. The upper level of the addition would consist of a learning resource center, chapel and computer lab. Under a separate application (VAC-03-003), the parish has requested the vacation of the portion of Whitworth Avenue that is internal to the campus boundary, as well as 120 feet of the north- south alley between Whitworth and Morris. If the requested vacations are granted, the applicant intends to dedicate 4 feet along the south side of the east-west alley between South 3`d and South 4th Streets to public right-of-way — resulting in an improved alley width of 24 feet. Throughout the City Council's consideration of the vacation request, extensive testimony from adjacent properties, residents and businesses, and parishioners has been made. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. Landscape, utility, parking and utility improvements are included with the project proposal. Once land use approvals have been obtained, the applicant intends to initiate phase I construction this summer with its completion estimated for summer of 2004. Proposed phase II is scheduled to be constructed within the next 5 years (2002—2007). 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on June 18, 2002 the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated for the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation. The DNS-M included 4 mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on June 24, 2002 and ended on July 8,2002. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. , COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non- Significance—Mitigated: 1. The proposal shall provide a pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 4th Street to the northern boundary of the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 2. The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. ' 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: Section 4-9-030.G lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department -- ,liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 5 of 9 (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE & OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (a) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element The subject site is designated Center Downtown - (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The objective for the CD, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan, is to provide for urban environments expected to redevelop as destination shopping areas providing neighborhood, city wide and sub-regional services and mixed use residential areas. In this case, the applicant is requesting approval to expand an existing parish campus containing church related uses. While this proposal does not meet the economic redevelopment objectives planned for downtown Renton, the use may provide a neighborhood and/or citywide service(s). Therefore, this proposal is generally consistent with the policies established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. (b) Zoning Code The existing and proposed church use is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. Proposed churches and/or church related uses require approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Although the parish has existed at this location since the early 1900's, the proposed renovation and expansion requires approval of a conditional use permit. The proposed rectory use would take place within an existing residential structure,which is outright permitted in the CD zone. (c) Development Standards The Center Downtown (CD) development standards limit structures to 65% building coverage of the lot, 95 feet in height, and requires setbacks between 10 and 15 feet along street frontages. Detailed discussion of the project's compliance with specific development standards will be discussed further under the remaining conditional use criteria. (2) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. There are multiple church related uses within the downtown area such as: St. Paul Ministries (decision pending), Pilgrims Rest, Church of Christ Scientist as well as St. Anthony Catholic Church, which has been in existence at this location for over 50 years. The proposal to expand the campus would not result in an additional church use, thereby not necessarily resulting in a detrimental over concentration of church uses within the downtown area. The proposal will, however, intensify the existing use in a manner that may impact surrounding properties and uses. (b) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The project would perform renovations and new construction either within currently established campus boundaries or on acquired properties immediately adjacent to the campus. These portions of the proposal are generally suitable for the location in that it would further establish the campus setting desired by the applicant by bringing the uses closer together and lessening the existing disconnected nature of the parish. However, the proposed rectory use north of the main campus area would be more than 380 feet from the northern boundary of the expanded campus and would be separated hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department _oliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 6 of 9 from the main parish area by almost 2 blocks of existing non-related commercial and residential uses. Although the rectory is proposed within an existing residential structure, such uses often involve more than residential activity(i.e., choir practices, meetings, etc.) — potentially housing numerous church related activities when space is needed or perhaps on a regular basis. In order to further define and establish the proposed expanded boundaries of the parish campus, the rectory should be located within the main campus area. The proposal to place a component of the church use a considerable distance away from and outside of the campus would result in and possibly encourage additional growth of the parish, as well as create additional impacts to surrounding properties by pedestrian and vehicular traffic between the two properties. Therefore, in an effort to reduce potential campus sprawl within the downtown and minimize impacts to nearby businesses and residents, staff recommends the placement of the rectory at 215 Whitworth Avenue South not be allowed under the conditional use permit. (3) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (a) Lot Coverage:Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The CD zoning designation includes a limitation for building lot coverage to 65% of the underlying lot. For the main campus area, the proposed expansion would increase the existing parish owned property (154,462 square feet) by 20,261 square feet through the acquisition of additional parcels and with the proposed street vacations — resulting in a total site area of 174,723 square feet. With the total ground floor footprints of the buildings in the revised campus (62,205 square feet), the project would result in a building lot coverage of approximately 35.6%. (b) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The CD zone requires a minimum setback of 10 feet and a maximum setback of 15 feet from the street fronting property line for the first 25 feet of building height and allows a minimum setback of 15 feet for the portions of the building over 25 feet in height. No rear or interior side yard setbacks are required unless the property directly abuts a residentially zoned site. The proposed building appears to comply with the applicable setbacks with the exception of a 50-foot wide portion of the structure at the entrance to the social hall. This part of the building provides a setback varying from 5 to 7 feet from the south property line (South 4th Street). The design of the proposed structure will need to be revised in order to comply with the applicable setback requirements for the CD zone. Staff will recommend this be required as a condition of approval. (c) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The CD zone establishes a maximum building height of 95 feet for development located within this zone. The proposed two-story structure(s) would arrive at a building height of approximately 32 feet. (4) COMPATIBILITY: Due to the site's proximity to the downtown, the subject property is located within a predominantly transitional area containing existing single family residences and commercial uses. Although the area is zoned CD,there are a significant number of single family residences that have been grand-fathered in as permitted uses under the adopted zoning designation. Although the parish has been in existence for quite some time, the hexrpt City of Renton'P/B/PW Department ...Iiminaty Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 7 of 9 proposed expansions to the overall campus will have a significant impact on properties within the vicinity of the site. Discussion of recommended increased buffers to these properties is further discussed under the"noise and glare"criteria. Based on growth projections conducted by the City's Strategic Planning section for the area between South 4th Street & Houser Way and Shattuck Avenue & Smithers Avenue (totaling approximately 5.03-acres), there is the potential for future development of up to 468 residential units with 875 residents and up to 43,821 square feet of commercial uses —resulting in a potential net increase of 2,438 daily vehicular trips. If the requested street vacation is obtained, the closure of Whitworth Avenue as part of the expanded campus proposal could significantly reduce the redevelopment potential of the immediate area as envisioned by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The street closure could also result in significant traffic increases to other limited routes in the immediate area (namely Shattuck and Morris) and eliminate a component of the established street grid system. For these reasons, staff recommends that the requested conditional use permit be conditionally approved to require the revision of the site plan without the use of the Whitworth Avenue South right-of-way as part of the private campus property. (5) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. The parking regulations require a specific number of stalls be provided for specified uses. The following ratios would be applicable to the subject proposal: • Churches: 1 space for every 5 seats • Auditoriums/Gyms: 1 space for every 4 seats or per 100 square feet or area dedicated to office use • Offices: 3 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of area dedicated to office use Based on these requirements, the proposed renovations and additions to the campus a total of 225 parking spaces would be required for the overall campus. The parish campus presently contains 112 parking stalls. As part of proposed phase I of the project, 155 parking stalls would be provided for the property within the main campus. Also under this phase, the existing social hall would be demolished and replaced with 75 parking stalls — resulting in a total of 230 parking spaces for the campus. The total amount of parking provided will be in excess of code requirements, which requires approval of a parking modification. Staff is in support of this request. (6) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The initial phase of the proposed project includes the vacation of two portions of right-of- way: 1) Whitworth Avenue (north of South 4th Street for approximately 2/3`d block); and, 2) the north-south alley between Whitworth Avenue and Morris Avenue (north of South 4 h Street for approximately 2/3rd block). If the vacation of Whitworth Avenue is approved as proposed, the applicant would dedicate an additional 4 feet of right-of-way along the south side of the east-west alley between Shattuck Avenue and Whitworth Avenue to create a total alley width of 24 feet. The street vacations have been proposed under file no. VAC-00-003, which is pending consideration by the City Council. If the vacation is approved, the applicant intends to improve these roadways to accommodate campus traffic and enhance on-site and off-site traffic circulation designs and controls. However, if the vacation request is denied substantial revisions to the proposed site plan would be necessary. As previously discussed, staff is presently recommending approval of the conditional use permit with the requirement that the applicant revise the proposed hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department - 'liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 8 of 9 site plan such that it does not include development within the right-of-way portions through the site. In order to address pedestrian traffic through and near the site, the proposed site plan depicts a pedestrian connection from Morris Avenue to Shattuck Avenue through the campus. In addition to this east-west connection, the proposal has also been required to include a north-south connection to provide a linkage from South 3rd Street to South 4th Street for pedestrians as a SEPA mitigation measure. The applicant will be required to revise the site plan accordingly prior to the issuance of building permits. The proposal would also result in a net increase in floor area with the potential for an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system; therefore, the Environmental Review Committee has imposed payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new average daily trip. (7) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The existing campus is currently situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses, particularly single family residences and small commercial/service establishments. The proposed campus expansion would result in the intensification of the church use as well as enlarge the area of impacted properties. In order to address potential noise and glare impacts to adjacent properties, the applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan which is further discussed under the next criteria. Short-term noise impacts are likely to occur from the initial construction of the project. The applicant's construction mitigation plan, as well as existing code provisions limiting construction work hours near residential areas to the hours between 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Saturdays, will serve to mitigate these impacts. (8) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The landscape plan submitted with the application includes the use of screen shrubs (pyramidalis) along the eastern/street fronting side of the parking area on Morris Avenue, as well as along the north and east side of the play area/parking area accessed from Shattuck Avenue. The proposed screening would appear to adequately address potential impacts to the abutting properties from parish activities and vehicular circulation. Additional landscaping, including street trees, ornamental trees, conifer trees, ornamental shrubs and groundcover, and grass lawn, is proposed to be provided throughout the perimeters and interior of the parish campus. However, as required by the CD zone development standards, a minimum landscape width of 10 feet must be provided along all street frontages. The proposed plan does not satisfy this requirement in two places where only a 5-foot width is provided—specifically, along the south facing entrance of the proposed social hall on South 4th Street and along the east boundary of the northeastern parking area fronting Morris Avenue South. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant revise the site plan and landscape plan to comply with this code standard. (9) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. hexrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department =._liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JULY 16,2002 Page 9 of 9 The proposed primary use of the site, as a parish campus, would include a number of accessory uses, such as school and sporting activities, day care operations, seminars or counseling. Staff does not have enough information to determine the frequency and number of individuals that may be present during these other church related activities. However, it should be noted that non-church related assembly uses would be outright permitted in this zone. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The proposal would require the demolition of existing structures and the construction of new buildings. Additional existing structures would be maintained and continued under existing uses. The proposed rectory would convert an existing residence to a residence/church related function. While staff has recommended this component of the conditional use permit be denied,the renovation of the structure would require building permits and compliance with the adopted uniform building code in the event it is approved. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately sewed by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The proposal would be required to complete any necessary street and utility improvements, including the installation of a looped water main, fire hydrants, and payment of Utility System Development Charges. These specific requirements have been forwarded to the applicant as part of the Advisory Notes prepared with the Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated (DNS-M) issued for the project. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition/Renovation, Project File No. LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H, subject to the following conditions: 1. The renovation of the existing structure for use as a parish rectory, located at 215 Whitworth Avenue South, is not approved under this conditional use permit. 2. The design of the building, as well as the site plan and landscape plan, shall be revised to comply with the applicable 10-foot street/front yard building and landscape setback requirements of the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan to eliminate the use of the Whitworth Avenue South right- of-way as part of the parish campus development. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and may necessitate additional notification and review requirements, if determined to be appropriate. In the event the street vacation is approved, the applicant shall submit revised plans that comply with the aforementioned conditions for review by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The project shall complete phase II of the parish campus within 5 years of the date of this approval. In the event any portions of the project have not been completed within the established timeframe, a new conditional use permit must be granted for the additional construction. hexrpt Cil Project Information Site Address or Location Parcel Numbers '` Proposed Rectory. 215 Whitworth Avenue South 7841800090 Renton,WA 98055 D Proposed Parish 314 South 4th Street 7841300035 "'C Campus: Renton,WA 98055 w0 7841300120 U 7841300125 South 2nd Greet w G 7841300105 9'y — 7841300100 I —1 • Y 7841300090 7841300080 \ Site Plan 7).a) d \ She A4 dp,' �, 3 7840800050 • • 7840800065 e \ \7840800070 lr............s I 9a J\mR G7840800110Iaoowi \o O g 7840800105 .. '73O 7840800075 � O ry O SE Lot(Proposed SE corner of Morris Avenue 7839800150 •Proposed U a" 4- Parking Lot) and 4th Street 7839800181 St.Anthony Rectory C 7839800185 215 Whitworth Ave S • . Project Team Rentan,wA981755 Q Owner: Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle _ J Office of Property and Construction 910 Marion Sheet :uthL:&:t________ ructures Seattle,WA98104 _ I Applicant 31 South 4h rish tre — { g ors ble rnase lsolo NahMeeNg Rooms Gymnadurn. 314 South 41h Sheet Cl�ssro ms raomoetergRenton,WA 98055 rrContact:Greg McNabb.Parish Administrator — nhda Classrooms and scrod Admen P:425 255-3132 ,,IqqYp v� pk F:425271-4729 I — - " e m S� £3 ieatamtzs Proposed Whitworth Ave Architect: Rutledge Maul Architects,PS Inc — g 784130)120 ROW Vacation 19336 47th Ave NE r2 i Seattle,WA 98155 7saoeomto „, Contact:Mark Stine 784l1rc1145 reatsaotos , P:206440-0330 . mtss 7640860105 UNE F:206 362-4381 s 784080:060 .,`.. smtao b iE Site Plan'A' =y�#Cr!I yeaaemoss 1' . I al Sheet A3 Civil Pacific Engineering Design,LLC r Engineer: 4800 South 188th Street,Suite 360 e.ttsom9o ✓ 1/t Seattle,WA 98188 I _ Site Plan'C' °'• _•S3 Contact Lou Larseni__ Sheer A4 P:206431-7970 F:206431-7975 r:_, t_n Landscape Glenn Takagi Landscape Architect Architect: 18550 Flrlands Way N.,Suite 102 Existing Church Shoreline,WA 98133 Contact Glenn Takagi Existing PMC P:206 542-6100 St.Anthony Parish F:2065465277 - - - -_ 314-South 4th Sheet- EtlsBng School -- -_ 7e39em150 - - - ...at • Renton,WA 98055 [keg e'nib` c,„"�m Electrical Abossein Engineering replaced eslaged by structures �.//77 �,.,,,�, Engineer. 1844114th Avenue NE p ypa tas°s°°tst / Bellevue,WA 98005 Contact Jay WeWerneria3 Or / P:425 723-9441 I/ F:425 462-9451 / Contractor: SNnstine/Associates L/ -J P.O.Box 1370 Sumner,WA 98390-0280 Contact Pat Oda • - Pr 253 770-5858 F:253 7705277 Al Campus Plan 0 0 40 BP 110 160 Srthard No. nam • -41 t,' = sk/ / • '�' , r ` \ R.NfER 'i AVEx S ,�aa' 11 .s,___...-,,, \ , . w ,,d, ,‘ c ,„,-01 ,1 1.:-.. li .47 tAng5r,k1-. .- i li c-,„"--!:: ,ct 4.\ "N i-all- cii+ IP :i4 II lima . AVE: �: j . 1,,, ,,, I Iva u,i 'c y _" .=sy: -��,�'. uhe S Z /g ii.r`'t0i,a llo,• • .I. ^.5a[ �1i� Ia4 1 .._7.1��r5r� '=i U ,/,... 1pi 'ItA I�-'pp�-iII 5 go Iio `F 11 l�oLl : . V.gitliWil. rjou':\ •li .f ' ;'•U • SHATTU K AVE• SN 5',`(I 1 FEL:i .It D -iiTC,rIlEligilt 1140-2 .-_gi,t t!PNIIE,•,-4.--7 J., 2, M21112, + q Q F ti I +F ,13- --- ------7' ^ i��iP98 1 `��I� q�� I"F ' __ fig,: i �_ •WH/TWORTH l•.� S. V I giNE a/i, dP I "ice S w y u x ��a 5/. 'r �r`�4Y A'' (" `i[ia�'w 7h�l, ca-v �7�1 Jppi�J�i��i0;ppiq�0p�15b��1'. 11IGGL^r“E I z i .L0ti1ii F�Q O � i //lei I 1.m / g:( a I,�. t a� I �k�JJFi� ,, MORR/S ° AVE t�. S. 2-�� 1 1 II 7 ®�® Im lE�l 1I +'�a��;Y f.1,l-.� C J/�//i •.7� I y i I SM/THERS AVE S S. I ',I nti • �0` ' g \ . ] pi.q El t LOGI -YE :15,(6, ,Ilil_Li ..1 .ArlPflgiiir 44,4_:,.-Ps,,-. .\ ,t,-a,b,..:.,,,,,w5,74,-- p.- :...-i-,..---,.no 1-tvo—firmiliooL,H,2,.N__,TAt------- PIEVIrill ti'l �j BURCCNETT nn Apr + //� ti S. I I - ., ram, ia 3 m o 0 0 § a 0 I$ I Conditional Use Application for s" 1-ii: Phase I and Phase II Expansion of C .4 rma... St. Anthony Catholic Church Ex, 3 . .�� Renton,WA • 1 II I I w ON APROVAL OF WHITWORTH ROW VACATION.d YVNERT6ADJI6f PROPER -----L— - --_--�- -_-- I LINE 4'9'TO THE SOUTH TO WIDEN EXISTING ALLEY TO 24,0.TOTAL WIDTH • 'L EXISTING ALLEY 20'R.O.W. r 1 1!:iit=fCH:1C1Ci_1.4"ICrr13i Allialirif2L'iAIWtTai2iiiit — — ---' --- -- - - _--- ----- - ------ 0 � 1 N PO ROOMS 1 1 ..I, I -- • laaaewrto ��C •a C 0�y: t _ .. 2.:..., — =l F 1 • PLAY AREA AND p��y EXISTING BUSINESS • 0 '` PARKING FOR a a! V • CARS 1 II L • ro ... z �, 2i Ft' e L_____i L_______ x7a 1 ma...:.. ¢.o:. , le le T.a Ira ��1 t W 3. j 9 10 I 1 10 to. to. 10 ; 1 TIII ' C i � r4 • �v,Kw X v[=.1,::o KM. vvs[ I• U ,PARKING FOR 29TCATS !• PLAYGROUND&PARKING tm RmsassaKxa b PARKING FOR FIRE LANE FOR 19 CARS AND VAN FIRE LANE 52 CARS COMPACT CARS • 4) ACCESSIBLE STALLS • r'pV l �I Z vac orvas 1 �I \-,Fors M�o ccs iy e • • 11p1 ACC a1 I PHASE II PHASE _ i M � 'I 1- wzLLAf yc a a--91 c+-8/ ® ® lorivera . Alia uv le le , xv . -1-- [suss �� , -I I` I12 I 1 I I 1 •.I-, 8 nev x arw I�rm " Cr) 5.001.ESCAPES s IPUNSMO •p•e j va j 9^ EXISTING 7 a Nsl�rms�u+o NEW •I aNnaa«runoN KOMI'ME.Of H' PHASE b FlRE LANEBUM. 1 v 'erg BUSINESS \\O L37. EA . NTWG GYMNASIUM • ^' o rV, R • -. /�, 6 ACC t —9 • II TIII_ HNEWW FACILITY PHASE II til '7 1 k l;l l F!r{ L I;' Pt" I N�.p'�w 1A� �� Y �v,I •O cwr:.,r; Move umsR J I b 1:1 sn:u!/ _i � __ 8 _� i [ i 1 I_ LI I I •U EXSONGKBSCHOOL e 0i=8- ay.NHoar.CH 'tv •'CLASSROOMS .. I I 1 ;I I / Li j,, . NEWIUNDARiEN :v`7r, • L 4 2.R@g 1. • , . --- REMOVED • o e � . 1 _ ` a¢ ° •• - . P V.COURT L ` vuonxt Vwleryge Ow X - IRE eSTI Noov as C I•-_�,1 < r�InNisv �o � EXISTING CHURCH• 2 _-- WIiH'BIG TOY• E I - ,�^ryAn. q� •••:••L�vgpd[p} PA OFFlCES.; PHASE - L •I'F LA• NNE i J /��, ��17 N RIS14 OoMv[w.ve E W' _ - I—� I NEW SOCIALHALL A0e0a+0 v N • J,1,1 1 ❑ O I S .,81'.��ht, EXISTNG PARISH MINISTRY - _ .. O ®' ,- 0 EXISRNG K8 SCHOOL - „ y= 4=:. CENTER a ° 2e I To ermorwto -091 - rFC#55 GwN. .. 1 ; _ - Q .. II ,IA , C_,.C..CZr-1 <0310 M]em 4,ar,. rE1 V. o:bm ar LL--, I STAFF o 1■�.,n¢ -^ •r ;.. y%Si` 1i� 3 PARKING o` ,� •''�} ® Ex15nNG WALK e .••-. ,•, / "r--, - SIDEWALK su v...o:,om. 1i MINGELEa.uL /I Ai WII I �, *, aNNoa euth-4Th-Street,., . , --S60'R.O.W.°= 1 , - •1 l I ( I site plan 'A' A3 0 0 IX 0 aU a0 0 ea UI )) nv Ir>< ,.,,;;„;,,.,,. .. Parking Summary Site Area Calculations / : D4sting Pang Main Campus SE Lot Rectory Totals ' Rectory: 20 Existing Site Area 154.462 28.468 13.355 196.315 V / ••:.s, T wri is re w r j :1,r r,r.. School Playground 59 Proposed Site Area 174.723 n/c n/c 216.576 Social Not Lot: 18 • GN'3•W``ro ire / 4s.03.^`L" Displaced PaMrsg on Whitworth: 15 Existing im2eMosn 126.324 20.909 3.134 151.367 s ccrc, s nx,r n ss s. » Additional Impervious 1&731 1.105 3.25d 22.983 / e rx,r:s�... --j j..��7 Total E,ds1Ng Parking-... 112 Total ImpoMosa 145�5 22.014 6388 173.457 1te / V O Lit V L L Vet ----- New Gym P56 gRegaled: Area Addlnnal Building ragePstfve0 62.205 0 3.544 6SI49 W ( `J New Gymnasium.Social Hal araf Side Regurled Lot Coverage Percentage 35.6% 0% 26.5% 304% 0 v ' f�., .. I . Meeting room area: eas 15.285. Interior Partin L00dS0 1,174 920 n/a 2.094 G.,� 61) R.O.W. Hat to be removed: 4.65E r LandscapingU „ Total Addtlonce assembly cr 10627 1/103 SF=105 Landscape Area Proposed 22.611 4.9A3 6.997 34.59E o V1 -- / ....... ..a,• Additional Panty AOmF,: 240) 3/1000 SF=7 •al tg / „°.• nev ^•� - - .•0 ••�.• ••,•• rban Center Design Dve4w X �-1 ..,,a,.. m4awimm '•""-^ told New Stalls Requiretl 113 Zoning Requirements zone.co-cD_ j -bT egp�aA,prmmc p (Rre sU,od addition Wt not odd siatlaempbyees.) AOawable PWdcq rn gnY 95.4 Gw L ---'w"- 't - Propatad naaa�ng nelgnr. 3r-r n }y 412r.`4)" Told Rearired feasting plus additional reou,lecO ........225 = sM-f,^45" k be.^ Building Setbacks Required. 15.min.25'mar front yad to hWldngs y N C ::+c„.r»., ;• nT7 .c..• , '• "' • Prrooposed Phase I PaMng over 25 feet In height. Ly 0 O ;p ^ ♦B ' , s, r Moir!Campus. 155 10 toot landscape 0TO s0,000d dung `1 ...' „.. 19 . Former Social Hat Lot(SE Lot): 75 sheets �Q.. v �N Ln q.qy. '• 1 VP, 12/�3 • Told Proposed Pa Hng ......._................._.....................230 .d oa i1;u • ------ 12c a , U P., R.,,,y4u. v -H O }_i[P \�\ re ; iPHASE I COMPLETION / 2 v J Q� �. ; \ / 511 , Hs,iS'! 8 CI ia ,:-,,,,,,.... - 1E MI lc /, R1q'oFS rl 11 IA-.i Cr..,A O/�ECEogRR[ry1 \ la OP 41 "0 ( 000) wpm000 afire. ,�° 11.-ei)k �F jiyaj^ 4.„, /te /4/ 40, o =i:EsS�� V V ire ]'4 s Mill �7t ' ' O� 1phiptii -t1/1..-"**_E L *a p 14'4 o% : Q '� race . e �1 ' di� / PROPOSED ADD 0_ NO HOUSE 11 p / kIIIIIIi/ ►:: SBB•3e'Ise•un \ '.\ • Site Plan'C' SE Parking 1 .1.01O Site Plan'B'-Rectory O B0 0 10 20 30 m 0 Kr 2a 30 4a ea a,earb Ham Na m W PHASE II PHASE I 1 C Cl =t7 [7=•=0 CIO _= ] 0 ,I 1--r 7771 GYM STORAGE PE U 6-7 Y __ w ° � - l l r C1 C] ua 0 . l:' SCHOOL P Q P. Id '-' 4--• OFFICE �.^ O mc.�(rt1 AA • WORKROOM Ili, °t( , r-i 45. I i fon •^�i�l- L AG — GYMNASIUM ci _ U ca SCHOOL .�I ^i' k•-� u�c _ o� COMP :1;"'I- 1 o ADDITION i -1• SHOP I � --: � U JAM 2 VOL Q w 1-2 M II � m ' N -�_ • � , CONE COIM _ - _____ _ Q +_ a w awl - - - I�III,I I- I � • T.J I NURSERY PLAYGROUND Y STORAGE - --- •--�'- K-1 K-2 -3 �1 Y . xi_ O _��- :7 e rl�I t I I I 1 jul, ._,i ti _ 1I 1 p it 1.IIj GL NURSERY STORAGE CHILD LIT. 1 Erik �'l I il T � r• I 11' 1 1, ATHLETIC __ _ — •jl�,. . ;j11i1 • &BRIDES ` I. . _ - LO BY I — ;I(,'•ills' 'oil 1 I - �. - f , i!. i STORAGE = W�� i li i r^ I ' 1I b K-3 L,<. af(�. ;jlj i.tln 9L - - __I _ - =f_I: -. '- , ;11 : I_ N1 ESE I _I _. -- I- I "II ( iiiiiw- 1; - -- - - - - - -- IJ`.� SERVING j y! .........7___111 //l1�� r WORK RM 'ECEPf ill __ _ I••• I 1 ❑ C V---'�.�• � /r I I ill 7 KiIIP5l all PMC ADDITION III ,l ' • J._ _ I. _ - 1 - O 2 C - --- - - -- - - - - - OFF4 OFFS Off2 OFF1 i'11 " ` W� � .j KITCHEN -- -- -- ----- [� _� ,— --� - I- Q 1� 17� SOCIAL HALL iIrri,f LL 44�� j" /� „ `u}_ -:1 Lr ----f I-r0 \-_�'1�-- --- _ _ ELECT - 11f01A�E— a stela 1 EXISTING PMC co.00e is. Aces °'10e L --u- -_k_r A.f S= TRASH Rom. 218 J 1 1 ST.VINCENT STOR1 --- _ - —- — -- Main Floor Plan A i A5 o d• e' I? la' eT PHASE II PHASE I ma- I. 0 J _._,,==-1,--,_ OPEN GYMNASIUM MECH I ,-o0 wC 0 --" BELOW O ._ I I I ¢ 6' o CHAPEL i j p'�., 0 1 f4 • ob - LEARNING "' C Itt . RESOURCE CENTER - o 0 GYMNASIUM U a. L - BELOW - = COMPUTER LAB C N I'. Q t°- I a . STORAGE H,�11 1 H,-� i1 t _I. T (FUTURE CORRIDOR) I t I I {i-I O. oAm 11.15EPS • ART12 / �i 1 ��_LLL 4gq `'1{1 'y ;I;�j` fl YOUTH s tiljI� - '�:r j OPEN MINISTRY Eh tii!I•' jlu: °FLAT°ROOF MUSIC ROOM _ lI'"'' °"'"•t{! STAFF LOUNGE MEETING BELOW =_ CHOIR PRACTICE °j��r!;''- 'h' (' — AIM -1- 1{ 4-- t-H I- 1 --- - lit 11 I-- - - - I-- - - -I . HIGH l L_. J Vv v u\Y � - I 7 CEILING i ��/�•,�MUSIC STORAGE �I�! - - YOUTH OFFICE C •:/:� WORK RM I J :l QM-il I �, MEETING MEETING • — E7VOFFS OFF 71.4orj_ru OFF 6 OFF 5 I�_ I �1 I bxvrtH iu yp° F KITCHEN MECH �� °ice Lon HIGH CEILING AT _.i _ f��aRr. ( e SOCIAL HALL �,o 11 b I1 �� --/�__ __ ��_ "FLAT"ROOF .b..,w 00. a BELOW Ws ' u,Off u 7„ „° bs b, o „a•.• 'FLAP ROOF 6 __—D_ ._._ Jam____-_- - Upper Floor Plan 6 P P 0 A6 No,15 c • ....A.*, \ W r Em,wO rFRLAeoa. 0 coo.D D n ,r, P ran nuaaea L. / !;� �\s oonE.Eou cau euw asson wa,a Sum Co)R ACCFmS EI.CFDeaIX `. ,vN10rk SNCCO — r, .+�-.o liil_15,o v_:..® ® ® ® --\ y- E . -, ®DER® ®® ER s 2 = .�''""rJlt'. :<:.+$�.��SS+:k...,td-N' ...t._e,•.s_:::.,.Ea z•.. ..,.Aril .`l;..i7.'+#,�...ipnl�k'-..,•ku .�N :.w:,;,>:r-nf',` ,RM. MO.GRACE . "I r ... I N ° 0 c 0 • E`Wrg Church • Parsed Driveway and , Sodol Hal!and Meeting Pecans Gymnasium New School Admin&Gasses P-s , ` 0 Drop.OR/reeding • • • % v a North Elevation E g > ExIst'ug Church I--s C SCRHILED Me MARItD W. 'BE C 0 n O tl ,wo,OUE STUCCO GSM. II .� LACED D"'01"°" �s`'S e.�a L1' Pa�DM uaaoaa AVG..Da•�a C- — TOP E no,orrs,u6cO oraaQa mnwa RED emar // \\ Q .p • w; i'='t._, �"= o• '1.V.wt 47A;.,t.'b�aX= .i ti .. �a ':-'.'=^s.c;.Z.L;,ac;,.,-,—,s.,t,e1.11 ` 'r.h,::4,,i,E`rri::1 7tr-F-i-7,1,F.i,T=7,:1-firt7 ";.,i:.'vim- • . rw6HOPME MING GRACE . 'C- . ._ 'p1A1PSw°Oa�NTS- • New school Admin&dosses Existing P.M.C. • Social Hall and Meeting Rooms nsnw aa.nE Gym asium GRAM Mill ' Y West Elevation East Elevation(From Raised Driveway) € r. 5 MICHLALCAL MINI s wuMEDrn.LL E, COW. =e�'�° a ,a LOWED� EIM gTWaTOt¢STUCCO 'n • iMil School Classes A • Porlsh Office• Section at Mechanical Loft(South Elevation) LIEOALLCAL MIE+A LOU. FTaSiinGRrn.COTT. EonsP.. Dwwcow rmw-�.a uOOTwa C.00.4.9.0.115 =nDKD .W 4DaEIEIGH PANTEHn.E COPING C NaTa.IE STUCCO P.rED IRH COA rv.OTONE SNCCA FX6TWG O est. r , O nMTVq,a Dv n ar ua�r . ..... NOS-Tral �,E ■ 8 Ei e 8`8 ,8'a' ;■. ® ®,-it ® .■ i II pi q:A. e 7 I • :'� ' ■..- / \ a \Ai rt. /i.' it I 7 ILS. ■■ �7 rem wry q S,.As. . - r r .... L1 { �.� ... — 1 = B i. a 11 : �. 'r In`�I. r - 1,w._ a..}11. z+ Emnec aa.DE School Crosser; Es/sling PM.C. , Parish Omce and Meeting Rooms , - Soda Hall Raised Driveway and Existing Church Drop-Or!/loading South Elevation(From South 4th Street) Building Elevations Al 0 r le• so• ar ea• . 7�- rs -ter ::. fi J n 0— �5 4W a s WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION a� C o] 0 ..a. Vac t 'll"It1I1d\ .. l,m - iit '�• -r�=__ n�.r33stfi:ri:i- .�l:l �F--_l uft- t FI+Fia-14:t�'t ',iI�1�IiI 5'11T 0. ^. .CI•. 4.:?. . tip, - 4 i- SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST ELEVATION 9 r_I ;I. I, I � .ss L_`�_J e a cut.w,a. • f ra 1 A AT= HIL .. . ...., '� ,I I \ 11' WI,' 1 _ �`�',•�=5'j I 4 l7 w•ri ry' raw ®loan - - __J `-.- _I er . I n t I ll y p o.e. an_u-w 4Tiu / I • I I ��- - '' S., L _, *'' SECTION AA 1.191•221 OWNS KM 3 .uo . ' r �t /_ \� 4J e. .... EXISTING I40U5E ' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: RECTORY REMODEL&ADDITION A9 s fl 0 L D U South 4th Street PLANT LEGEND Symbol. Plant Name/Remarks $o o . ilExisting Tree .. o " um,x�� • Proposed Street Tree P. .�=:>�z Ornamental Garden Tree gI 0 V 7,'.j`�� Narrow Conifer Tree ]2 { 19 PHASE i COUPLE110N 12 Screen Shrub (Pyramidalis) Puma .. _iai7S Cub Inal •• ' 1 Ornamental Shrubs/ Groundcover Beds A ,: rf%0 Lawn -a✓ 12c I:* '.' Of f +. fy fky\ U7 • :.Ve `V„ . V J 5k {JY'� 440 S.F. .. i L �y 4WD, c, C 2443 S.F. j ••0 S.F r,I i � I I��pIIQQ1 rls.r,‘ IE lib -': r. : 1c W 702 S.F. 11 1c .4'" 22.014 SF G.7, .6- LAND. •E RE00 11 SF. PROVIDED.499 IF. . 485 S.F. fr,..JGU:" \ 1[16.441 L111 IarAaaP•awlxt . I - - Ran by ewrvar Landscape. Development Plan — 1 tit . I G PM.. ocm SW Parking Lot (phase I) 2 eo• ' . Key Map Not To Scats Li D - • ..0 • 0 • • • w U 01rm m ADART PROPERTY LIE a-D•To DIE Sail/Ill To d. PLANT LEGEND 0 • , I: R OI DGSe G ALLEY To 2C-o TOTALNDm q i�1...r� alley •• •:F Symbol. Plant Name/Remarks * ..�,. • Al Existing Tree U 7) S` li '""� • Ems, I _ Proposed Street Tree ,,,, a r' �¢ •fir ►1.��' /: wa= E705DNC CHADNNK FENCE ' i'`; �.'�Gmamentai Garden Tree' c''�— RELLDLm TER•• {t_ 'r� Narrow Coniccr Trce . �@ 0 PEASE 11:RARa. �5:1 o EasnN.BUSINESS O► Screen Shrub(Pyramidalis) 326r7-+-�a ADDITIONAL:ARS(-•: PLAY AREA AND zb? .3.. .444 .. 'y sou:. GFCR SO is m g��WL WI..* CARS 1312 SF. t e. 1 - `C3 Grouaandcotvealr ShBedsbs! 0 Z R SED DECORATIVE '.7 Sq ' I PAVEMENT Lawn W +. G773 �-. V�i�%lam Q = • I I I I BI 10 1a to. 1a 10 1": �♦�f L. fi.. V Q S V �.��. �� PLAYGROUND h PARKING - i ^M�' .��. 1 106 S.F. ne64 E.P.PKI. 101 S.F. , PARKING FOR 9524LAN S.F.P E �sy _ FIRE LANE FOR 19 CARS AND VAN 1 !•• �• C F REQUIRED;64 S P9 can LANDSCAPE PROVIDED;1106 SF. 3 FRE LANE r/.�� PARR S LANDSCAPE PR S J� compact MUSSEL STALLS BENCH ` ` .♦' 1174 SiF. 62 CARS LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:M06 4F. �• 2 ACC • • �� U �� r•� 11 b' &INNENiiiiiurru.0 -.1■ii:-`•_'iiiE,�. .ii■`_"/�.`♦/r'`• `. —' H r.4 Iiiriiiiir smordrentiir7rir - t 110E c r9 +, liiliiiiii yJ 8u` liiliiiiM Cn — ■i ■ ■ii■ ■i•iiiiShiiiil 7,,,Af•� l.. more k3 ;'•.". ^.$3 : e' s at.21 lya -x �ii■ y Rill - - qmo PHASE I FLAGSTONE PAVING '•'`' +cn 4]' SCHOOL I .� n3';:N;:>:k'':::::a:s FAWIT `l 6 ACC •._ Ell r LEI 7 b b b' b b" b: ., • • No ipr•,`25 S.F. I • \:'•! DIVING LANDSCAPE •1D! I ilr1;NM DOTING SCHOOL •1 a?: � � r/ . }�, I • . iii. 1S.f'� cab i\\iii' gr 7.110 iEt1hMIL . - ■ii.pir�v 9i■ cn a) i Ir11i' II I =' it ��.,� +.�3. N I •� NEN SOCIAL HALL G111NASNM AND JE►@ �, '� : Wm r y 1. � I A- 1- ••PARISH OFFlFE IIIII :♦ v CONC.BOLLARD o p L�-'�_A�t•�,•� , • a ' OM � �.n i.._`�/♦`�IL� 6'O.O.C. TP. 0 CONC.SEAT .�`EP - -�` „r�'i • `�'� COSTING auRa WALL ;� .. GA-BM/ i T.... '..,EIalu• �" ,,� 7��, � 1 _ ` _ aW �' I�IPO' SCULPTURE OR •S a •".. IEriuggi �, .., ....-.�., qI .aa•1� 6'0.O.C. �� , �^ /Ir FOUNTAIN ' dS +Pd't�Y i`' �T46 s'1 ��.♦`��.• I ,�x RAISED DECO- TIVE �,� ad t z1, t v�E O le7A =sde::::-.;.---Pw9- war LESS G LALDSCAPEu:::II: -•.ING v-'„r 3e°I� I I,�e?."�. . 'S� o - ----- -im',.x"w.'S.a'11a r E)GSDNc LANDSCAPE BENCH jl'--1, ,0 TO EN •:'- 3 -r M` ..,. P"..- Re. D:g■ . .:" nti L' �: 1 'smav v TO REMAIN TYP. ,� yr - .= .o..• I •/ )w•utm • .. x.. II GRAIN IJNK FENCE I� •.in■ SEW 0 CO ,. 4 4 i a DEW,. ill Ng I i-' �°• FM masu••>n prw ••'.W/PLASTIC SLATS � • mar •' • EXISTING STREET .....• + PROPOSED STREET TREE TO 201.0033 main campus TREE(rm.) So'h 4th Street TREE(T SP•� REMOVED µ'°' °°0• Landscape Development Plan - Main Campus (phase I and II) L2.0 • • • q Shattuck Ave S 11 ;1 p Q 4 ( 2 ' . �� • f • ill I 11 l9 .. 11 s lc r ii i= o• - i - t X „m a i' i •�17 - ;t et. NTH" �' . , . pao �o �.I a-��ppp 1 1►�a��ICT3 Whitworth Ave S I;., /ill' �F, ��Whitworth Ave So. gg ,:.. ....AN • Div�!,>.,� WE ,AF: ii ill it •r,: P ,'• e■ gq 1. ;9g 4y!y,�I ii i�ar.�iii h'• II ' R al,t' • _ °n: it-tliP we 1 P n.' [Qp[Qp� 1 2 411 ra ICII ,akin }d, id4 1 War .',,./ri►nn • 44,41 gR 4� AYE -I ®°•''"j � i. � ,ni ri I ; i m �1 F anwwosuvc NI •+ ;.. S6-::+».i*4Y li 1 • Morris Ave S Morris Ave So. ‘-' xrre- ir c ,. . L1.1' a� if \,,. 9 16 i i 3R'nb • • air•.=?1,:ax. ia,sS1,; sa,,;-.i>..six...,<.la...,i>,...im,.i4a e%i'. 1t. ■ p I , y Ira IJ . """""•6Rmle�� s' �� rma A •, 7/r�� di..■.■. St. Anthony Catholic Church �/g a a; OON* 1t 3NTON,WA �� • ` OG ■o■woa■o w+f■■rr ��//! CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING �1 On the ID day of J—Gt , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containVng NPavi ,ExA-K^IA v ,ror+ rDecision documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing CVn S I141e,11 a A pPJ i rcalf rc-h A i oLc.sc., kmo r MA( k S-f I he (on no in e (_? rS P. o. k. 1A)c4e D • Cross p . 0.2• (Signature of Sender) L�� _ /I�/�✓�� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4 nJ(e e De 13cA 1A ) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. p et• ..1— r Notary Public and for the State of Wa�on . � MA YN ��{CHEFF > g NOTARY PUBLIC ' Notary(Print) ' 71YN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointment expires:9'TMENT EXPIRES:6.28.00 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003. ` Project Name: i5t • A rditioelqis AoUi- ion Project Number: 14-4 NOTARY.DOC ter' o, 1 C.) \ N./ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Work ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE T (PIEWING DEPARTMENT: f) I COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2002 T APPLICATION NO:;LLLUA=02=054;CU=H,CFI, DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,20.0.2 APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT MANAGER* esiey Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition WORK ORDER NO: LOCATION: 215 Whitworth Ave.So.and 314 South 4th Street SITE AREA: 216,576 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 93,325 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees,as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts.the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants - Recreation - Animals Land/Shoreline Use Utilities ; Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services energy/ Historic/Cultural N ural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 1- 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet �'1 otimiaL i rn ac4 : . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0 Date 1-2,b-of, Signature of Director Authorized Representative Routing I Rev.10/93 \---min AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Christina Meyers,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the COMMITTEE . RENTON,WASHINGTON 1 SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL The Environmental Review! Committee has issued a' 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 'Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project ' under the authority of the Renton a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of .,Municipal-Code. -- - ._ general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of ,ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily ADDITION s newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a LUA 02-054,ECF,CU H ' legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. Proposed renovations and additions toThe notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the South CountyJournal Campus.existing att. n:A 215y's h (and Location: Whitworth not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below Ave.So.and 314 So.4th St. stated period. The annexed notice,a Appeals of the environmental! determination must be filed in writing j ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing" together with the required $75.00! as published on: 6/24/02 application fee with: Hearing I Examiner, City of Renton, 10551 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$80.25,charged to ' South Grady Way, Renton, WA Acct. No.8051067. ' 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are ' governed by City of Renton The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. Municipal Code Section 4 s 11o.B. Additional information re-, garding the appeal process may be Legal Number 10511 obtained from the • Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Legal Clerk, ou n Jo rnal Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on July i ( ----------:_r___ 16, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider thee �/ 9-�•l conditional use permit. If the Subscribed and sworn before me on this 4 day of (.,2002 i Environmenftal - Determination is s `o iaeaeeeffir, appealed, the appeal will be hreard w�a .... &ON E f.,.ez'o Interes edZZ' oParties aurelicinvitedln o A.Z.'V- /.Y,o/45*. Notary Public of the State of Washin on attend the public hearing. rc o,C residing in Renton Published in the South County hc; �a07RRy o King County,Washington Journal June 24,2002. 10511 —0— m , Q m • o ®s'9al 00]Bd90'l9Aao 10® CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I MEMORANDUM DATE: DULY 5,2002 TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: NEIL WATTS A1/ C:(J SUBJECT: ST.ANTHONY'S VICINITY GROWTH PROJECT Per your request, we have examined the future growth potential for the area south of the St. Anthony's site. The attached memo outlines the analysis for potential traffic increases from this ara. Based on the values for Option 1, there is potential of an additional 2483 average daily trips from this area above the current traffic levels. Assumptions For this analysis, we assumed that there are approximately 20 houses in the subject area, and roughly 20,000 sq.ft. of commercial space. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the average daily trips for a single family house is approximate 10 trips per house. The average daily trips for an apartment unit is 6.55 trips per unit. A conservative estimate for commercial space is 16 average daily trips per 1000 sq.ft. Analysis Houses Multifamily ,,.Comiriercial;; Total,. ;':' . • Existing 20 x 10 = 20 x 16 = 520 daily trips 200 trips 320 trips Potential_'• ;;_ 373 x 6.55 = 35 x 16 = 3003 daily trips ' 2443 trips 560 trips Net Increase f°: 2483 daily trips Based upon these assumptions, the average daily trips from the subject area are 520 daily trips. The potential average daily trips for the subject area (based on Option 1 from the attached memo) are 3003 daily trips. The net increase in daily trips is estimated to be 2483 daily trips. Conclusion r Closure of Whitworth Avenue South could result in significant traffic increases in the future to the other limited routes in the area, or limit the redevelopment potential of the area south of S. 4th St. Staff recommendation is to deny the requested street vacation of Whitworth Avenue South because of this significant reduction to the existing street grid system for this downtown area. CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17,2002 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Don Erickson SUBJECT: St. Anthony's Vicinity Growth Projections Per your request we have looked at future potential development in the area between south South 4th Street on the north, Houser Way South on the south, Shattuck Avenue S on the west, and Smithers Avenue S on the east. We have developed two different illustrative scenarios for this area,referred to as Option 1 and Option 2. Assumptions We have assumed buildable land densities of 93 dwelling units per net acre and a average household size of 1.87 persons per unit. For commercial it is assumed that those frontages along South 4th Street could support commercial with residential above. Mixed-use development is assumed to make up no more than 20% of this area with an average FAR of 1.0. The two options considered are as follows: Option 1. Excludes historical power station/office building and small block east of Morris Avenue with two existing commercial structures on it. Its eastern boundary would be Morris Avenue South. Option 2. Excludes historical power station/office building but includes small block with existing commercial buildings on it. Its eastern boundary is Smithers Avenue South. Analysis Average Estimated Potential Potential Estimated Density Acreage Number of Number of Square Units Residents @ Footage of 2.25/unit Commercial OPTION 1 93.0 du/ac 4.01 acres 373 units 698 persons 34,935 s.f. OPTION 2 I 93.0 du/ac 5.03 acres 468 units 875 persons 43,821 s.f. Conclusion Closure of Whitworth Avenue South when combined with the existing impediment of the BNRR berm along Houser Way South and the western terminus of S. 4th Street at Shattuck Avenue S could significantly reduce the redevelopment potential of this area under either illustrative option. It also would likely increase through traffic on Shattuck Avenue S and Morris Avenue S. cc: Rebecca Lind Document6\d \ - - . - .._.=.' -• If' "4, , \ ', '1.4 , ,...,.- • 1,2/ . • . • - , . i :. , , . . . . . b,•\.', ‘' -3; -74 -I; 11- ., , -„e_ 4. • i -. --. , i '-' -- ,,' r.......,, w .:..,1 '..- .. 7 . , .• : • „ . i " ; ;• n --. ..- i' .. • "F..*Lii. v f. ''',..!-. ._ • ,,.i I -1 I atvie ; ;'!. ii,.. ' .i-'i.. L: 7,; . .....i.-1 _----, ..:._.-....7_,... ....,_,kr________, _ „,b,..,77 ,__,_.__._„.....„ ..i:,,,ifk. ,,,. --1,1...1..,77,L ..,:,..- . - .,:7,-, _ _ it. 11\6.- -------1!•' '' ' - - "14c'614j ‘-''‘:"; .- - • ' ` - -- • - - '-- •:,s--,t '' .“,.. .-,-.; .at":71-'-'- liTr :C4'..;.':"'zr,,,,A ''-:.r.,:-.-.,7• ..,,,, ,,, . . ... q a 0 i; 4A.7,4*.,S... ,...,, ::'•-•';`. lisPa" ,, . .,..„.- , . ....'......1-1". oi.i..,;--Y, ' :»Ifi.,..... •,..--- . ,..„..4,-.:._7"--,:-.'.;1.-' -..... -;-- • .• ,---;„,._A.•, 7--—1'1' ".1 -t-. ...6i441r--- •-•;" --',--- .-"..1"--".."-t , 1,_ .1. .. ,. 1, ..... %..- pilik --; ; ,,...... - ,,.... , • ....„0, _______ . , ,, .,..„ -L,--.'-• , . - - .4. - e -11, - - ,- . 0 , : , p,,,, .J ri ,.... - ,,, . . ,Ir .141,4 ... . . ,..„. ::,. „... , . _,; , _ , • . ! „. 1 • .. .or ht '-'41 ' '..-, ! :, - _. • 1 .. . ');x • ,,. rf._,..,.. itP--r ,' ;' 4- 4' -' '* ':- f• . 1. , • . j ... • .:.., - - -(-1-.--L1 • 1 .-.L: • ._-____ ,-..• ,...,.... , - fiat, _.,-,•,, , --) ,.,e. ?..:-•it . ,1--fai. • , r_-_,!,; _A-- t, • r „,_.'4. t ,,..,_-t. -. , - 1 kw?, ' • - - - ' .- . i 1 - r .4_ 1 ' 0[0-'141;Y;•_•, • - . • 1 • - • - - ,$ ..- ' r•-.4i''''s 1 - ,= =z,i ',' iu. ' ---: I,22: • ' • I..", . '' 1'- - • l . j. z1:-.. ,-,„::i „„/2,,,-;. - . Ys , . -.4-.:_...._' ._-,_„• -• _ .,',.'lirell-A.1,-- *.i- •:,--x-!.7-_'- - .„,,, !---L--„-_vig.----,: • - , fg. -„,...,Itt,, _,, ,,„,. ..,„_...T7_,., s. ..,,.-,•;'-,-.7,. ' , -1:-/:"'°,,..- i,--.77.-;-,;-4.-,---7,--,------ .:..,,,i. .„-- P-- l'irTain: - :F --,_,_- - -_-:-.1-F• t . .4.-_-_•-:: 1't--='-' • • -- .ii ‘s ...._ ( , --:' , 1-rar,f.-' r ?Ts,. • --• ig, , leallia., '''t ;. . ..4.1 ' ',..:: •"211111_!'. !t` - 3...\. I 14,,;... ,- 1:c111-1.11, . f .i• ' i IL;.4 t, tt". -3 •- - :4 11::. ' n '9'.'• 4- ..--1,..-, , ,.._ ,..._,..., .. .., 4, .,•',,,: - 1 i -• 4 S N__/.., , . ''1"-•". -,- 4. 1;1, c,„0" ----: , 't f ir:'-‘1,...-- ' ' Biltgail' `Pqr 411101,1:.-41 :-• •_„ -.:_ -L • = -7-,. ,,,;(1.1,vii I• ,.. -- 4_,_-•_-/- _ ,_.. $ ,, - , ..r, •fl 1. •- -,-. - 1 , le-C- 1'' " 's ;-•1::;•ktrC;'..4 , .' ----If.:•-;;A. ' \.'5:•,,,. ---:-.,.' ginc6,,,..p.;1!.1 -•• „, .,•• - i , . , , 1 --'-• ;I.;i.' ' ?-i :--•--• -(1'afrp‘wrV-,---fe,.,•,cl•FttitrylOrlir,-:- '--, ' • "7:1'.1 • : '- • ,.:.,7i to• .-,?...,,-..ini-,,,. f..f.- •,,,`,-, - . -.:. } .. ; a:,.,_14, ,,, - . -,r4ie.7---TrifkotIrtasiftvi 01,t14e. ...., -.2 4,-...Lf,,- -•...._a c. ,, -,4°Ar r-fatimis i!,1 • I ,..:- :,. - -. 3.-. , - .4& '11 ` ihi'4i i.i'l 'i..... --,,., .," ','.."-.. '16.11- .-2cUA.iAlliPt.'4.-*'-- -••-,---1 ,- ,': ..'- '777`.4:c ils, .10,.., Li,: i. .. ..i;,„-'-- _• - - . • -.4- -.jot* - 0, '• ° -' . 7. ''‘a*L .* tt,,. ...-rt'-',4.''(., ': 4,; ' 47, ::- .,' ''''-, .rtiftit,;7.fi -* .T•'':..-:, r• •E0-i .i.•-•,-..7.1-A•-.., . • --- ,-. '''' •—•'',.- '- - ..- .;.• 2. ...:,,44 *1•‘:. 1 , .60.410' t. 1•,,,;rvir--.14. : VI . --f...-.i. .1--, ' 01 -0 -- - I : ,. ,....- _, I . _., ..._..i.•.: ,, ..)... .1 ye. '3 . ' '' 4 7 "4, .4' ' '1'... i t 'i';4,. .--__A,.1'4-- ''.;';-.7 11"-... ,•-;,.."'; --_- _. --.-.--" - • '.r*t " :i:,.:t pr,„,. .' ' .. 1 . ."„'''. ''' •,- cr"rifilOPPV-.,- Y0--„---*- • - '.. ...,--1 iht j , - . 4" - ', il ..4,r, i 1 • ir 4 ...':1/4.L.. i. AA.: ,,1 4.".111 .-4,• - •t --.,1. • '.'....; '. ^.. -' -'. -• • / --.-,•i:_ el, , .:fr,40_ Npi• 1 I ., ' -1r- :, -1tp xie.i....,,<. ,-k I'' 1---,'3\ ,• , - • •-:- -... _ . ri,1.-e' r-,..t a 1 rl--'--. 4.--- '• '-'! . ' ri --• r ' i•—•"' , 1 „:, 1, i'v:'"'.'':... , • ' • ' • le -' - •.0 . .• -4.-• ' , , . ..., ! ... I ••''-;''-•••• • -"' - ' - - --le ••''''4.1'. . be '- :.- r • , NrA.,,i,ramf „„ ... :„.„2-•;,,,,',.,..,..,, . ^- ',: '1..,',' '''•---..L.., '''-itt '''• .-'..1-,' -..-- 'P-0•'.a. t "' 0-4,- • .' • 'r"ss • . "s' -'1'" • •,--' ''-0. Li`‘.... --1,...Ac'0 1 - .-• - ' 4t-- • - '-,-0 1 -(' rif.:•-T.1;v• -,1 7,74 ., 1-r-r--'•'-4,„„".-`•••,;'11. .1 1 -,•t;•0--_,,-af,-::,,,,.a,-,, , , ,...---,,,_.rirook, .. ...i-7- - • ' ','I ,'''42-1:;',k 011-'11i i-,.-7i,‘-'. --*/ Lt!'. 7...`, '1,,r01.TI',. ' ' '2"'");',P•;• -:':',-*;:-' s L 1 ,i . Ett, ,e ..;.,„ , r , .,.., - . - ------..it"' . . . ',3., -r ,..,..0,4.., HT ,t - i ,,; , t_...1, .*•'41''' •' • i ..,111,',I, ' -` 7 7 mow ':r,•'..; : '" 'N'.:J.11,11,0.11!. ‘ ' ,I.,'`.'' -” ' ',14#- '*:44,Iiii‘ty2V-L'''- ',71-`73''.il 4,•-•: `' sL.--' -"C4 .' ..,-'''-'7L-- -7\'-,•.--* . -.1,1-7'7r----. ,-.,• , -•:I -," , . ,tirog 3, _,dr re,),„, _....„, ,rn,„,,,o. \.. , _-... - • _ , -- 4- ._„ . ,.... , - -0 •11 •,..ii' -,- ,--3.4-•' :;‘,4 :, t' c_[ - ., ., A ..'.-ka--40..., --,,,, . for . •• 1(..--,,, ,,.. .. • . t I r•:, ,.., ,(s ,, -,' , IP ' 'T.!' ,;4: . • ``r- ''''"."-, ",,,,4,04 ,-1;.. ,till.7'r --"., - '''4 . ..kt Nov ,„‹,. 1 co*,•, toe -0 I 4tit-, . ) 0 -r--, - 14' '-`',''iV -:'•.' -.-.. •,..:. -- ••• .. • • '• ' ' • ' I ',4. .,"of .; .0.4t. • i . - .*._--A-.• a. ; • - 1 1.. _at...--, ...,...A. , y, Ar...I rl,' ' -,, .. -4- • i 1 I ' ,,.'i I pc;: ,--.. - ,Z. '--'eini" le ‘. - . • -, i....,''• '":. .-;-:-.,.'"'- 1, • ,''1-'17-4',':.': , -'; ' 1 : , . .., r*iftli, 16 ' - • -v. .1- 1 4 L' : '.1 - 1 ' '• ' •! - , • , , fi. ••=ip ,r--, ‘si •0 400-, .-',„ --** - ve • ••00 ^4,„" ,, I.,.';,-",% ,--%.,•'-'I A -1 44 jue* at, (;\ . cl: . l'• w.,‘'qe-j‘tiAl-f , ' 1414°T.1 '' t'.1 . '; -. '. h (•$'-• , ,, ., 4, , , kl ' ' S4) • , , :f•I.11 . ,- , 111-1- .,pr pi ,, ;-.3 rj . : : • ' (..,,, ,46 ,,. •••-'••,.__.1 ri•_....,:4.. fr -`,L LA,' 'n ro.8-•,„. . ,, . , il ,:, ." •1 I .,.•s„. „ ,,..t ., • , foil I . ..1;. )1 .' ii.''- 'allio-.- — -";:l..(18`4,'"' " 4.-,-...4 ', t‘,i.',.' .. ,.;/' • - ..'- ,, , ., '4,1!".1., . • -, itr ---- --:',II-r;,,,,,,,;-: —VP - . • ' ''L ',,'4-r•C 1^14 '.'''.'2t1P2:tt4. gi:t4•'.7'.,Stio\";'. .'1', . . ....,, L ,, '' ,r-44,4) t 4 1. 11..:'-'''''''44:;,9, . • '''' f-Thi, - UP•-.....1.:II , ..,..____ 114,, • 4 .. r . 31 i•Ai(1!i ! I. it'. '''_ ,-iti,..1;i4.,-, ...,4.„,.......,,v 4..,-; t..A, ..,7,. 'too ,,L., „itoc...,.....L.,,...•-• •aa'*:°-.• 4- . ,' ma.. ,,....... ,/1 ,-,...i.- 1 '."1, ,-,....',• ., ', ,,,,' - :I ,.%-c,. - .,4 s,•?.., v.. cl..1.;. ••,.. ,.,-. . •••,0 . -..,e.-9:1‘. ';' ' , Val. (.. ...i.1 k - 41' - • ' ' '''\.' ' '• ••.:itifi • 01-• '1°- • * V.• .- . .{.91,''' .- 0''''''''' , - ri. , 7 -1.4 . . -— . .-...:-.1.11 -... .-'..,:,-,:,.,,,.:,„-,?ir.f: , - - .r 4..,: ,1., ,0,1, Ar•% loV : -f.,....e'-',..e, ---- •, ,..,-- . 'I,. - ,,... , NIX,. , , 1 ",°-•,r164,-*,-. .'-'44---.' - I-,.. .,.,--,;,,/-1‘,..-14# . ,..,..t. - ....,,,....,4-, .,.. 4 ..?'•`' - 4. VA%'I I - II"' -,. ' •-1'4,,--:.N,It,, ,- • 1 1'.."k •'-,-, . 11-•.-- '441. '''.:''•_L-*' ai_- ..-....±4,:i 1,e,',.` p 7, t.,_ .p T"\'...-Iiiht i ....4 ti,07,4.y Veit . .'' .A•4 dt. ..,,I.,,._,, •1....,,..... ...7,..•."Lea:4 • ... n...... - I .. __ __ _ _ NOT10E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ST.ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthonys Parish Campus.The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility,the demolition of the social hall and Its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory,its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a , new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center Into the new • parish campus.Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials tube balanced on site.In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and ::,i I adjacent alley ways.The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00.003), for which the decision authority Iles with the City Council. Location:215 Whitworth Avenue South 8 314 South el Street. ' THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or beforo 5:00 PM July 8,2002.Appeals must be Iliad in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton ' City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on • the 7th floor of City Hail,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on July 16,2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the • Conditional Uee Permit. If the Environmental Determination Is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. . �TM.rt i .,,, n� 1e sss — 01I05I•>ills SITZ 31 I r 65:", 5 ro i'f 1 tf1; ( )All I I}l -i 1 r t.i\r 4 1 '' r IFry I - i o )I !wr! I fIi M. r t .tl l o- q, ; en C0.1 , I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. I DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper tile Identification. • CERTIFICATION • I, F,. OCkkivetA ,hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by m ' conspic�ous places on or nearby • the described property on 9-41 • • Signed: 7 re gz 7 1 I* ATTEST:Subscribed and om before me,a Notar Puilic,in and fo the S of �iV act' r re_c• ' • ,on the 0 day of Z 0 0 • d' MARILYN KAMCHEFF 1 NOTARY PUBLIC • ,' STATE OF WASHINGTON ' MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES ` . MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:8-29-03 1 JUNE 29, 2003 A. v� v . 4 1 City of Seattle Greg Nickels,Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Chuck Clarke, Director June 20, 2002 Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utilities Real Property Services do 10th floor mail room Dexter Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle;WA 98104-1714 City of Renton Attn: Lesley Nishihira Planning/Building/Public Works Division Development Services Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF St.Antony's Catholic Church Addition Dear Ms. Nishihira: As I am sure you are aware, Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) owns the right-of-way adjacent to the north side of the project site. Heavy loads,vibrations or installation of any utilities in the proximity, or over,these pipelines could result in substantial damage to them and the surrounding area, therefore, SPU should be included in any construction planning. The other issue that I want to mention is that the parking area on SPU's right-of-way is not for general public parking. The right-of-way is being rented from SPU by other property owners in the area. If you need any additional information please feel free to contact me at 206) 684-5969 or e-mail bob.gambill@ci.seattle.wa.us. Si cerely, fro 04%i/ Bob Gambill Dexter Horton Building,10a'Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTYITDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631 An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING ai-kOn the I day of , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing CAC ) t-krwki,1afion documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Cee L.;CI' • (Signature of Sender) 4AJ24J 04120r- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) , I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that I'�J r Ca 8_k a- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the dies and purposes mentioned in the instrument. M C-ILYN KAMCHEFF ► < otary Publi n and for the State of Wa ngton NOTARY PUBLIC • �- STATE OF WASHINGTON ` Notary(Print)M�.Y K MACHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointme a MENTEXPIRES:s-29.03 JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: i " / / 5� ,_01 o v� (A S 6-0-to 1(C, (Gi.0�G rfdd;Ho ✓� Project Number: Li2ig 02- 05if Cl/1 -Nr l�Li NOTARY.DOC AGENCY(DOE)LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015—172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 3190—160th Ave. SE Auburn,WA 98092 Bellevue,WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev.Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd.SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien,WA 98166 • PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp.of Engineers Ms.Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2"d Avenue, 10th Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Dev. &Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent • Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom,AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE—Municipal Land Planner - - - KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms:XRD-01W Seattle,WA 98104 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM / ,_ . . i r - 40111c1E- 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . POSTED TO'NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ST.ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF;CU-H The applicant is ',requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a , new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. Location:215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. lAdditional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on July 16,2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. • z — r�, ea A II J 'i •µme:: , . . �; »a t. .L Y • —J1E ', . 'vi -ktl /Ili - l'•7 I. NM , x:.,• Q OM MGM _ •i�'�- ++ry yy--y •Ric Y'CI+1 TLIJI.tf . .r•'`''"$ `/eft. ' `. =Re. pm'mm.w-!c ter+ ,,.a77ww. �. ::.t.�.t: ,LT!'y • :Loll Ayr inn ` ` !, /... —L-1.1/i�i� !•`,pI�f++F.� {y�f{�}c ,1'}��::R.'` nu_a 1. ; a +n:l�llgt; .i11 R,1.IrlL - KYl:1Y S J 0 Sr gigrelyrby r11 n do ,'a pX� ar5 1 3 { 11 I eZlf• inl u 71� —'n,,,.....,.„►1 O •lap- - } n•i..,.: •-*'nm,.aanw.voweun 3; irN •.rc E1=q, afu at.s''C}Crt'W IVI71. eP1,;=.,.-E1..,i,!.'&1# u:` LJ D_, /- o'ui ta�Ill' -4 i_j 1' •�Jc'.i. • arc.:.'. in o: RI eu I t \'-'1 � -,AL n, '.li,05 ' �t - • � ` o '--•21411la us I I I.e4 ni±sr[ 4474 � �C3� us , nl nLl.l a-t �n ers - _ ON 37 • M11r.i • t ephbathood Pbn .:yr .. Q . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT ' SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when callling;for•proper,file,identification. 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Proposed renovations and additions to existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. Location: 215 Whitworth Ave. So. and 314 So. 41h St. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on July 16, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the conditional use permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication bate: June 24,2002 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot CITY ( RENTON ..LL it Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 18, 2002 Mr. Mark Stine Rutledge Maul Architects 19336—47th'Avenue NE Seattle,WA 98155 SUBJECT: St. Anthony Catholic Church Addition Project No. LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF Dear Mr. Stine: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City.Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on July 16, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at theipublic hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, gr,CZ /9. Lesley Nishihira Senior Planner cc: Corp. of Catholic Archbishop of Seattle/Owners St.Anthony Parish/Applicant Nancy Rogers, Wade Cross/Parties of Record Enclosure o?ismtetter RENTON 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE Pink This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED). MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H • APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;-,the::demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction;:of a new social 'hall,,in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center;into'thenew parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number ofexisting trees, as4ell as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to'be balericed on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions. of:Whitworth Avenue and adjacent':..alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under;'a separate action (VAC-00-003), foriwhich the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 215 Whitworth:Avenue South &314`..South 4'n Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The proposal shall provide a pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 4th Street to the northern boundary of the property, The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services.Division prior to pie issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. • 2. The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. MITMEASURES ' I CITY OF RENTON - DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall;and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ,215 WhitYVorth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following; notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided,as information,only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations: Planning 1. The site is(designated Center Downtown:on .the City's Zoning Map and..Center Downtown (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan`.Land Use Map: 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m: to 330 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the:Development Services Division: .: ' 3. The final calculation of the applicable mitigation fees will be`cohducted with the review of the building permits for ithe project. With each phase, the applicant will:be required to submit detailed information regarding the existing and proposed square footage amounts of floor area dedicated to specific uses. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access appears adequate. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Construction of a building would trigger a separate plan review under the building permit. Street improvements will be required. 2. Transportation Systems reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and made the following comments: We (Transportation) concur with the relocation of vehicular site access from Morris Ave S (as previously proposed) to S 4th St (as currently proposed). The Parish's vehicular activity can be better accommodated on S 4th St than on Morris Ave S. "New curb and gutter with driveway approach" is • St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 proposed;at the new staff parking and loading dock access on S 4th St. New curb and gutter with driveway approach should also be provided at the new vehicular site access on S 4th St. Plan Review Water 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 72 psi. 3. There is an existing 12"watermain located in Shattuck Ave S. 4. There is an existing 12"watermain located in S 3rd St. 5. There is an existing 6"watermain located in S 4th St. 6. There is an existing 4"watermain in Whitworth:AveS.and in Morris Ave S. 7. The conceptual utility plan submitted• by the applicant needs to,be modified. In addition to what is currently shown on the conceptual utility plan, the.,project needs•,to•.extend the new 12" watermain to the north in Whitworth Ave S to the existing alley to connect to the,existing,4" main in Whitworth Ave S. The project needs to extend the new 12".watermain in S 4th St to the,east ta,connect to the existing 4"main in Morris Ave IS. 8. The project also needs to;install/extend a,new,�.12"watermain from S 4th St in Morris Ave S to Houser Way S. The City will pay for this portion:of�the<waterline(from S 4th St to Houser Way S). 9. Construction of a building;:will trigger a'separate review. Per the Cityof Renton Fire Marshall a the preliminary Mire flow for this;project is 5,000 gpm. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit submittal. Additional;watermain improvements like fire:hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. 10. Water System Development Charges,of $0.154 per'square•foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water andkor;sewer• service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies.. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 24"sanitary sewer main located in Shattuck Ave S. 2. There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main located in S 3rd St. 3. There is an existing 18"sanitary sewer main located in S 4th St. 4. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in the alley that runs east/west at Shattuck and then south down the alley to S 4th St and the east/west alley at Whitworth and south to S 4th St. 5. No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. 6. Any use in the buildings subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. 7. System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service ADVISORYNOTES St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review_Storm Drainage 1. There are storm drainage facilities in Shattuck Ave S, in Whitworth Ave S and in S 4th St. 2. The storm drainage system shall be designed to be in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. 3. A storm drainage report and design were submitted with the application and are in order conceptually. Additional'design information and calculations will be required at the time of detailed plan review. 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review—'General 1. All required utility, drainage and.,street .improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed ;Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an.:'itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements.is'5% ofJhe first$100,000:of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything;over $100,000:but'less than $200,000,:,and.3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued.;There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Building 1. Code review will be conducted at,the:time of building permit planfsubmittal. Parks 1. The proposed street trees located along 4th Avenue are required to match the existing trees. Coordination with the Parks Department is recommended. 2. Tree grates',are required for all new street trees and are required to match existing grates. 3. Trees to be removed should be removed with a tree spade and relocated. In addition, any tree grate that is removed but not used at another location should be returned to the Parks Department. ADVISORYNOTES " CITY ( RENTON ••+rlj Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 18, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA,98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 18, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limitedlnumber of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. Location: 215 Whitworth Ave. So. &314 So. 4th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510 If you have questions, please call me at(425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihi i Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R. E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE agencyletter\ :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parkng;:tthe:.:dernolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction:of IA new :social tiall.,.in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the'hew parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of ,existing.trees, as:Well as.approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced omsite. In`:additiori :the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions„of;Whitworth Avenue and adjacent,alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under,A separate action (VAC-00-003), forrwhich.the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:'' 215 Whitworth'Avenue South &314 South 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The proposal shall provide a,pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 41h Street to the northern boundary of the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development,Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase of the project. 2. The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. MITMEASURES CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT:' St.Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority.ties with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: -215,Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in,conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided,as,information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations:, Planning 1. The site is; designated Center Downtown:`on;the City's Zoning Map andCenter Downtown (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan tend Use Map: . - 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 330 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 3. The final calculation of the applicable rriitigation.fees will be conducted with the review of the building permits for the project. With each phase,,the applicantwill=`be required to submit detailed information regarding the existing and proposed square footage:amounts of floor area dedicated to specific uses. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 ,feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access appears adequate. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Construction of a building would trigger a separate plan review under the building permit. Street improvements will be required. 2. Transportation Systems reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and made the following comments: We (Transportation) concur with the relocation of vehicular site access from Morris Ave S (as previously proposed) to S 4th St (as currently proposed). The Parish's vehicular activity can be better accommodated on S 4th St than on Morris Ave S. "New curb and gutter with driveway approach" is St. Anthony's Catholic Church Adaition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 proposed at the new staff parking and loading dock access on S 4th St. New curb and gutter with driveway approach should also be provided at the new vehicular site access on S 4th St. Plan Review—Water 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 72 psi. 3. There is an existing 12"watermain located in Shattuck Ave S. 4. There is an existing 12"watermain located in S 3rd St. 5. There is an existing 6"watermain located in S 4th St. 6. There is an existing 4"watermain in Whitworth Ave S and in Morris Ave S. 7. The conceptual utility plan submitted;by. the applicant needs to..be modified. In addition to what is currently shown on the conceptual utility plan,,the:;project needs:to extend the new 12" watermain to the north in Whitworth Ave S to the existing alley to connect to.the,existing 4" main in Whitworth Ave S. The project needs to extend the new 12"watermain in S 4th St to the east to,:connect to the existing 4" main in Morris Ave S. 8. The project also needs to install/extend a new 12' watermain from S 4th St in Morris Ave S to Houser Way S. The City will pay for this,portion of the;waterline(from S 4th.St.to Houser Way S). 9. Construction of a building ',will trigger a'„separate review. . Per the City,of Renton Fire Marshall a the preliminary fire flow for this.project is 5,00d gpm. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit submittal. Additional,watermain improvements like`fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required:to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. 10. Water System Development Charges„of $0.154 per square loaf gross area may be required if not previouslylpaid. The Development Charges'are collected as:part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and:on sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies.. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 24"sanitary sewer main located in Shattuck Ave S. 2. There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main located in S 3rd St. 3. There is an existing 18"sanitary sewer main located in S 4th St. 4. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in the alley that runs east/west at Shattuck and then south down the alley to S 4th St and the east/west alley at Whitworth and south to S 4th St. 5. No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. 6. Any use in the buildings subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. 7. System Development Charges (SDC) are$0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service ADVISORYNOTES St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes;(continued) Page 3 of 3 may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. There are storm drainage facilities in Shattuck Ave S, in Whitworth . Ave S and in S 4th St. 2. The storm drainage system shall be designed to be in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. 3. A storm drainage report and design were submitted with the application and are in order conceptually. Additional design information and calculations will be required at the time of detailed plan review. 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage and street ImProYernents will ,require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting.standards by a;licensed Civil:Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an;itemized cost-estimate.for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is;5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200;000, and',3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees'for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Building 1. Code review will be conducted at,the:time of building permit plan°submittal. Parks 1. The proposed street trees located along 4ih Avenue are required to match the existing trees. Coordination with the Parks Department is recommended. 2. Tree grates are required for all new street trees and are required to match existing grates. 3. Trees to be removed should be removed with a tree spade and relocated. In addition, any tree grate that is removed but not used at another location should be returned to the Parks Department. ADVISORYNOTES St.ANTHONY'S ADDITION/LUA02-054 PARTIES OF RECORD St.Anthony Parish Archdiocese of Seattle Rutledge Maul Architects Greg McNabb(applicant) (owner) Mark Stine (contact) 314 South 4th Street 910 Marion Street 19336 47th Avenue NE Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98104 Seattle,WA 98155 Nancy Rogers Wade D. Cross Cairncross&Hempelmann 322 Morris Avenue South 524 Second Avenue, Suite 500 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104-2323 f7014.,/ ilk/kb Last printed 05/29/02 1:13 PM aIAnouoI t', = r°ig„. j.Fo.tU ' R, ni 1l1l RAVE. t S �ds i C*/jr �� " 4¢. NN ® K a � p P '°' fir D, i9 ; eo. �; (cal o' .A4.ao `II', ,: (� �• / '�/ 01 Iv"Is N of,E^ L. '�d' I LAKE eoa AVE. /; S �,"tt��y 3"_v 1g �` _""i ��-SON fir` P fw ��IO� 1] ,p vt. t erFmsek t ,.r�1 b.:I r3 u ,.. �I,1 ER ieYQ_ ` 4151- 1k 1 i-L0.° �F p I _ • �4ipgn1 r t" III ,,,F:(q SHATTU K eAVE,y, C yr,�(t' y ` a .' f +! 4" A/126 gLigla r' e , ' ' •_____,- ----- r - ° G' ' - 1" Y a1j k �➢ e ZelWri 1{ i,r� I LJ='b ®®6 6t e, VI L9. . G� ro r•• A1.11 I I 4 ------- -- - 11 - 4 µyH/TWORTN S q I%� '' 4 ri .°111gP Er'111:. 72.11"ull00];i9``‘`"'1* ""116-1 I— '' ' I' irrilL. -11' MORR/S a AVE S. e � �1 f �y (".0 7 f v ,. r.xru // .'r, I e �',L 1 -7}R a�ram-V 3,'� ll� J J J I Fn SM/THERS' AVE S. G L' € W��A, LKyI p�- PoIJPAP'S�I'* 3I 4E (I N� r �y :rye r.�. 1' gill � (r�(1�A �474: � _--- '111 J:yi.`-1 . JABS =I dMC',(y�/�/�j'�{{��Ci ® r. B BumW °I YUMo F. k� off! /7M �� ly� I _E.r-I� y [R nnBURNETT JY/- ._ .' a �' ` IC n l�.iidil�giilL.4::p�`T"ally :-5 `2 ¢ , li �.0:-:,-17, ,. ',111 ......: ,. ,`'p® n j. I7., I oho 8 m a=0 ka 0 n 0 a 0 i$[ Conditional Use Application for U q` .,�- �� Phase I and Phase II Expansion of C :-,4 Re� acnPSIM St. Anthony Catholic Church ® AX�.0r Renton,WA _. a ••••-' , :•=i •-‘-- ... -....;•.:LA-a4 1,-.--- • I I YR,.,- .W., .0 -I..„."1,./... . •1•4",..„--• - „.„11111, ''if X :R 4.4 ,- LI TAW. • S. ...?„ 4-5i. i., IIII _.,SA ti., ---- • i 4t, i---051...- ,, ,Alitity:, .-;;-,., - ,..d1 r NO '' .0-C.Frir ,..91 301°'1-40.;•:E.A. %- COL:. '.441 ...-L•00,41;,-=‘47.41,!,- . .....„.i.).\\ k: -e,, 1,, ,_. ... • ,,,.... „.,.,,,,, ,.,,,,. [41-.:111 F.17,F.,...72.....-- " - ; -021!.....: 0 I ‘`.!, vs' '. 044131- 10 `. '`. •-•'-•,:\ 1:1!"1 a•-' e - .-An. . .. a 4.1z- /• sai ' . . )151044h --1-....,-,:f. '•-••,k1,.. , .,,'"fia` ,,• ‘,00 -.likil' - 11 ,. .1=1 4 "• i..-1 idl--'illif ••• Pli' ,s4rg- ..--,-11rsx----11 ''-'0. 14,2 ,„- ,. '•V. CT •. '411Itilinaljalk4.• 11: .* IF . . . Zi'Z•mV3,711.W , ...• n• .!\ 2111,1111k ' IA,,, 'p g.i, • . 1-111Yei.6. l''''`:.••''::-V II .• o' • • ty it , a .>':•01 OM. , -.1,-.:,‘,:•,, • 1E1,4 , ,74,1„.- N. 8 ...,,...Ilii, F.41•L''. t , a SHATTU le,. • ' •AVE ' S , 111 1 "441-1 ..j#.• i i5e, . ' Pi ' 441"1 1° " .I 7 4411"416]!PgX- ' 411/1:g;t16ta AlifiEglig2 El- 111-.itilocktil .t-------------- I. Le gx.Ant,Pia;1/4 144yViPFMERi fiC115Zrep git .1111fr:t..AiiitIZIFilift tit I .--D 1.gAluiv ua.-1[41.1. .'L.,,''''iALI' A e,..r., . -..,..,. P.Avai AM ro;',1 ‘ . I WIRITWORM . rif S. ; 1."--'-'— • TIOM / If 1 -‹ •g ,,,T*Jaiiig; gr-2t,-.71;ir. \`71:.7 -ar734.1.;',1t1.1:121".7ii.igil Lal`?3:3_41.0iilhip,. i , • i ....L.E1j-i ---- , . N • -- ---Fii. r,'...714R E.i: '3421'r •• . ..0•71./ , igJAV '''11" '''Ll 2-10, JAm9P , g i MORRIS . I... . ••Ad•ri il.2 .Ti-V..... ..;_ ,,,.,•: '• •' .• • AVE. S--- f: il , Q 1 a3I •'4,c ,P.:1;21,-.7.-.7; ..• 117;,:?.' '-:'-.'1:',-V.1-A.f.,:i,..r_n.-. •.;,...•-+,..--,,.k-•,-, ...,-..„,..3! i--,im'•' I•filtilii7-24. jziit 304' . .ti.-M • k. . iA- ..-' _ ..2.1_• ' VI 11,1..'`,.1,AL:1. 'in • v g !..-_-___.__ Cis.% ....---• ..........•--4-•""' MI '71 SM/TH-ERS •AV. .\ S. . Pf Ailialitli-ORATiirliliEV:DL4. 1 - 1 114;. tiiir.fiillill!ggri i, ;'1.46,. N-iliggiffigl a i- tA;:...-- .L9AK% - : , •, .--,..-7,11.--,:, 3." ' ' .-•-•---et• •%\ .1.- PM i pv !--- . • ,,,....;,,,,,,,,, ,;,:... _, - _ _ -,- " . •.: ..4.,,;41...k ..11,1-4tIcilp, E-1 cora ''s 10 iii 1 1114 •-••• - -•iiiplZii59!ii2.!1991e.-- 0.. --I- --/ 4i."4"---k. , . M to ii.,.„.. ...• 11'..T.7171111,111111M_G BURNETT . ..• 'Ai -' • • •--- rr -I A ' • • " .1 --imis5gErrAi I' ' I. . . . , Nil i II. LIIL' 1` Or V116111311110w II MiEmtiirl" 17"----" -0., VD1-1,1 AVE Ka''..11"ri,EQ Zel•ar S.":;t DOE• •---./r•1:2" CDL ':;r1e2::-45.hry----;"'wr,r1rmac.....mIr:•a, '11 I "-• 77-191' ' "I dli:"I' ' 411.31113i't • iglk"17iIMMNIt 1 Miticil;-4;4121L441 ', ... . ._ . . .A •f.'• - levi • ;:tt.i . . . , — ,. pn I • . . , . 141 1 ,,. -- - - -- - -- - - —- -- - -- - ON AFROVAL'9.07441}iiiWO''''• RTHROW VACATION.IiiillY'.8MIAST PROPERTY „Vir::::—: . :',.'::-: • • . I . I • .•AL!I:5 A I . I 1 . . I 1 D000:20A.IAA."' t :11.ns IE A 10 e ( UNE 4,0'TO THE SOWN TO WIDEtEn11NG ALLEY TO 24,0.TOTAL WDTH EXISTING ALLEY 20'Ravi. • .mo. ,;,', .:*'''' 5 ' egg-gig.,„,„„ . i ,10-0:.S.4.'5..1'"-TM'ti3 f,0..Caa-..1,-nl.M(.01f."Mlelf;;;TC..' Al° D 1 — 5., :,.. ) -•"tll • ' '4!'"L'.';;•.W" = TMOMIN RGE MPEOA.DE,N CF 1ST-i f. N.N-.4-q41->_ I "D0S1NGPONABLECASSROOMS 1 t tiNgh--c ` 0 - c .1 E PLAY AREA AND - 0.11-illip,o ..y), DIMING BUSINESS - .2 0 n t PARKING FOR 50 - ,.. • a' 0 5 - ,c•nounal,” 9 ki;'igill t • X • 41 ..0 < a' ,----- i ' .uvIr" .al • ' 3 7= -1—•7 1 klillrib:',, • r:i.,. 'ic/3 0 e,- , S$9.3.9,awaa 31P,IN •,1 . Cll 7:X ; :; / .. ......1...2. 8 6-PC ID 31.07• 10 100 100 10 1 1211:1 1 k, / VITIP . ...,. 4 AA- AA IME Mil - .. -1 , ,111 1; Zr.L' 1-0gli"5 PARKING FOR 29 ' •-• C '. r 1/ PLAYGROUND&PARKING YAWED ALLEY PARKING FOR 3'. COMPACT CARS FIRE LANE FOR 19 CARS AND VAN FIRE LANE ` 52 CARS '\-COSMO 1.901ENCES TON REMOVFD7 • W ACCESSIBLE STALLS AC PHASE II N PHASE I f'--'- 'T7:: I ' 17 01, 7i •1_ _ • . -I- .1o. ,..., ••••••- i -,--, rnn-- _ 1 ---f—° -I-- C i t,13` ,,,,11 6. i (S. . J VC-, ,.„ ,-.if 1 <71: Vkr WO fig' 1; ' `,‘(g.'::13 '1 1 / .., ' 1,41.. 1141 .Alr • 1 1 Eli.,_ i:::-46 ,Att. - it,A--4"4" 4174 4117,,,t.- •-•:::;: ::::,, 0 . -4— • aratft-e• U, , .. _ \ 1; NW 30 42.W IMO. Cc) c 8 0.3 1.11N6 ( PEICCATE DOSING SEWER KnAti PER ulliMPLAIZ MID S • ...1-.,/, ,11,,ASI.7 ,.„,•„ EXISTING fl:.7 .N.. KIP6.4. Ii: - =1,r""' BUM. iREBUS!RELEASE Cf EASENINT AT BIADING LOGNION 'AV Xo"W132i'" 6 PHASE II PHASE I NEW GYMNASIUM 11...1.1 ROG,93 ST .: 7 •, •,„ b RREIANE '.1"..r 6 ACC ----, 1VA GOON \ 1 \ g A lair, _I \'.. BUSINESS --' >(1)ti 5 1 1111__ 13 • 5 _1 ' NEW SCHOOL FACILITY .7 . ' 4. 4. , r... 6. I.r,..... s — :I /t21 il itot. .._ , 04••••30 0r W 1X1.087'''''' i 1 c,,,,,, MOVE UNUSED • A 4 a ool , b WANG •, : - --- - — 440, I , 1r 10i.SY.ID3SPNG K•8 SCHOOL am=I am ma gZ'VL,:M"6 Idg. 1 I r-71 0 i MI,....,. - MU..•AA' 'Gr,rert s' 1 g § g WM R001,30 IN 11PPF.?&C011.62 Sr PHASE I MI '30 OA ;i:ra , A-10" NEW 10NDERGARTEN MIME 1 E: .1 •CiASSROOMS 2i., BEM ' 1137aMi4I.171- 1P.11 I:_11,11ME 0 . 1110 10 1 ilIM-- 0 ° I ' ill 41MTP:F ID351.61.DENCE 0 * . 1.. rp 400,40V10 0 , 0 ..•,.e.c. ' .31 ..,, r,,,.„ 9 rO (°L`..7°'Sr.yre„, 9'W ,..2. O • BUSTING CHURCH . ,., MAN FLOOR.3-1, i"Pp i FIRE E o' 1 ..` 0„„ .." 0.Y COURT PHASE I 5 . •• . ' 'BIG TO - ,- i.,:. .,,,,,, . NEW PARISH OFFICES. PHASE I • ' If.11.i',."'111 i NEW SOCIAL HALL ° 10,00 04EWAV A . ' . • • 0 .N....0..,111111111 """"i; q.[ _ .•-- , ''••'•'n4 - ?••••I••• 44 15 loaf COM.33 37. • S MMIRSEIIM0 i 0 . '''' 0 •• PA 40 (PAO A • - --—• ---- - . -c-tr 4, . ...oe,„,,,,ii, EXISTING PcARENTRMINISTRY MIN _ .. 0 ° • 0 DISTNG Ka SCHOOL I 4 7 ..46.1 I., 04.011009•2125 "KG] — .M 1 ' ,0 P.442.0.000.VW 4-Corm 0.004 f• ‘,7,_,._.....,... ''•4, 0.040RC011.44,34 :f• 1 2c ,, ''''' O • ' 10 BF 1.14.4.00 .• 4:'..' 014 fir, III I ..i.,•'"". -111,110. ,_.., - , —..... FFV—,. it. kv•-a•••V' *..,- V Irk 2 ,.5 nva,--- I t* ® 1- CO. EC010 ,,,, :,8E 1-%,-)""".• Ill 'ail lac..ci . F„,,,iirr„A,...k .•,, ,,,, Efe.' ''''‘,' 1 I t 4 41,.,1N., ' L.11.82 MS 1..1183 I El 1 .. 1 STAF 9 ® !,:i....4:4 EXiSTINPNALK R.1207 Data a,aacct 1 -- gliMIET0ii.... 11/10 / ....no.. - ffg.•;11wity, !,.1% ;2,. Ai 400X Wen.. 104511.40•CmCm. WWF1741, VW VP Mr "-- •=!He;, fASIENEHLFECORDNG [[::.r.e ,0V-43.3P• e9f0[49• ..,z 74r,•2 43/ • MIME.44030.000 01 CAC 1E A A A 0-A0 C A A'.• • .i South-4th S#ect -„,..„,....- / ,...r..51, FSP1n,fi• :::rrvi ii Zi i'' zo.9 tw"" =re. ;:n7nirnI. :• 1, 60'R.O.W. i:111111A 1r;-.% % . , " S " r4ri• 1171-M.O.. !Fr.!'•••‘•' .....' .- . ' ( A3 site plan 'A' .0"..mo...... 0 sheet mo. 0 10 20 Me air' N.. • Ct Project Information r Site Address or Location Parcel Numbers Proposed Rectory: 215 Whitworth Avenue South 7841800090 Renton,WA 98055 _ D Proposed Parish 314 South 4th Street 7841300035 L ' Campus: Renton,WA 98055 e„ / 7841300125 South -Street _ w o �.l 7841300120 7841300105 C•2 0 7841300100 I I o 2 '_ 7841300090 11 0 7841300080 \ Site Plan'B' 'U K _C Q 7840800050 �1`�SheetA4 pR,� } 7840800060 I y m 0 o 788408800070 I e\S I a, U „ 7840800110 I I \_'/2p\ cl«� �� 7840800105 7ea78omvo I 7840800075 'o d O SE Lot(Proposed SE corner of Morris Avenue 7839800150 Proposed a" Parking Lot) and 4th Street 7839800181 St.Anthony Rectory 7839800185 215 Whitworth Ave S . Project Team Renton,WA 98055 }_Owner: Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle ICr) Office of Property and Construction 910 Marion Street > South 3r Seattle.WA98104 — Q I _C Structures Applicant: St.Anthony Parish Exi ng ortqble c6J — --- rase1-Social Hog,Meeting Rooms.Gymrw9um. 314 South 4th Street Cl ssro ms Paw,Office a Kindergarten Addmon g Renton.WA 98055 rr T ^ Contact:Greg McNabb.Parish Administrator — —Y--"`—�0 °-a�OO"II� 1op1A°""n i d P:425255-3132 — y I 0 igg F:425271-4729 o 3rwrr2sProposed Whitworth Avef8Architect: Rutledge Maul Architects,PS Inc _ 7841303120 ROW Vacation Ebb, .. •.i• 19336 47th Ave NE Seattle,WA 98155 7840eagno Mark Stine 7s4tsamas 7e4,saolas Contact:40-0330 7840eo03s5 7840e03105 P:206 F:206 362-4381 1 sooloo �—Site Plan'A' • 7s4oeomas Sheet A3 CNiI Pacific Engineering Design,LLC //� Engineer. 4800 South 188th Street Suite 360 i i_.e4lsonw •' 1.,_ Seattle,WA 98188 } Site Plan ��r orr� Contact:Lou Larsen Sheet A4 P:206431-7970 • _ F:206431-7975 {'? ._. tr .h 4th tree Landscape Glenn Takagi Landscape Architect Architect: 18550 Firlands Way N.,Suite 102 1-• Shoreline,WA 98133 Existing Church Contact:Glenn Takagi Existing PMC P:206 542-6100 St.Anthony Parish F:206546-5277 314 South 4th Street -Existing School 7839800150 ngen. moo • / oa Renton,WA 98055 ��r 04. Existing structures to be ��,// Electrical Abossein Engineering replaced by parking 78398[0181 I -----"----.- Bellevue, dome Engineer: 1844 114th Avenue NE f1Y WA 98005 Contact:JayWeWerner783 � P:425 723-9441 F:425 462-9451 , .---- Contractor: Shinstine/Associates L/ _J P.O.Box 1370 Sumner.WA 98390-0280 Contact:Pat Oda P:253 770-5858 F:253 770-5277 Campus Plan Al a 4o 80 1m ,m 4u Noun x7&'Yzoonhoz uaawE • E n.v+. IBA/Apax v�a}E Parking Summary Site Area Calculations / zz - __ Etlstng Parking: Main Campus SE Lot Rectory Totats ..) _ ar a E Rectory. 20 Eldslag SRe Area 154462 2B.46B 13.385 195.315 V / rws, ii rorc ii le,vv E s•dux zE za:.s Scholl Playground: 59 Proposed Site Area 174,723 n/c n/c 216.576 L� .ai:s • Social Hall Lot 18 SNcy�BKie / e1�se6rx - Displaced Parking an NTesvodh: 15 Existing Impervious 12432d 20909 3.134 150.367 a'wxc sE sB,z SE a arx sE zz ae as Additional ImpeMous 18,731 1.105 3.254 22983 a'rnrc m zv.,<x. as Total Existing Palma.. . 112 Total Impervious 145,655 22014 6.385 173.457 wE . NUE / '�` �LJtt`111 �et New Gymnasium iung9090/0: Area sRegond Bc/dog rage lot Area 62.6% 0 3,544 55,749 ho U r-F New Gymnntlum,Social Hail and Stalls Requrletl Lot Coverage Percentage 35.6% 0% 26.5% 30.4% 0 .�ySt.. 1 e Meeting room area: 15.285 Interior Paton Landscaping 1.174 920 n/a 2094 W O U a • s} _•+' 6O R.O.W. Hail to be removed: d.658 a qq7 34598 O Ern nh total AtlCltbrwl assembly areas: 1Q02] 1/100 SF 106 Landscape 22611 4,990 0. .. /\max' t,a,. x�Is eFoau+Eo wmscMESRP W 120Oaa _ '9.... ta^R.arE(Ss �edt Parishional not aatl stall m..yoyee�SF 7 'Proposes Req n ements za�»:cD-uman ceder Deslan wenav ii K •` \ ,...eo.e Ne9•mepwsxoav ^r e;i.e TddNewStallsRequlretl:............stag ... 113 Zonin Re u1r ing 1 ___ w Wading eight. 32-7 OsW .xrs., g height 32-2 Q,—E '}� f A' Told Requlretl(esdshng plus atlamond regatetly............zzs 599ar.�'' and �b \ vs 1Es E+ Building Seibada Required: 15'mxt 25'max front yard for bullrings O 0 C:a vs �E s�,v x s•wv ss v.s - Ev... Gm / '' ' " Proposed Phase l Faking over 25 feet m height. y cy YO :2 ,. •.• 8 / Mdn Campus: 155 10 toot landscape stop requlretl along _St 9 EEdE,19 { \ Former Sold HanLot(SE Loh. 75 streets '�CLr ( O c1tw1rE 21 �.4-2j 12 Total Proposed Pa/dng:.._........................_..........230 ctl Wr a crew..e xE b 11.1%al6•x Y ° 95909 904 COIL co ••'• ",•"v.s `� /:), .v 01 zn E z� L b O v•'roc'E .m x E 12C O cyV a EEttcr,z9 9 U P.. ,,,—}c. I T C O CONM',SiAL, 1 1sro 1 t0'da 1 2417 1 IS4 C.1) a 1 E.E. PHASE! MEP \ 0 PHE 1 COMPLETION ,$ F PAWNS FOR 75 CMS R aEMaaRON CE W81050055010959 / `` �° Kn. § L ..,..Ede., E 0 USN 18 ? ~Q.,,,,so,.x / , E.PVC�E zr as WA w.�o01 / 31 n ESYr51"H 2, �� 3 • j i �E c ,OpE 7 N?o-:.. 9.5,77651 __.!?6.35. - " / ■ L41/ • xAYL. ...x N �� I �`1 Imo- III�3`'� j . MO „EexRtE>.,Ex Q\N a , , Q a 9.2d92 / ;�� -, .�� I=- F mom. t---------- i 3,,.. LY 'MN PROPOSED ADDI O NGHOUSE ". O Ob. _,,t Site Plan'CI SE Parking a 12 p 0 Site Plan'B' Rectory a ,9 p 3a da N 0 Ail NMh North a�'a PHASE II PHASE I ]e'P E. 1261.0. ■ 1 '/' GYM STORAGE PE w o U • .0 UI. • -711 -:_f) a�S RI SCHOOL OFFICE n O7IU • OM1-1 YWORKR . i , ea �.!;�� oo ` GYMNASIUM ' Ci Q SCHOOL Iti t.w g w o IL ADDITION ® I P S°oP I I''':a' i — U U VOL 7'=c.L.-',- 1-2 " — m Q d C CONE COUN _____, u i/'1 _ _I _____ JA_N'_l_li________i_r ,�.�__ _--__ V J11El NURSERY Ii PLAYGROUND F STORAGE K-1 K-2 I p , 6 : _ ii, ¢� _� ,}us g 'i i niiie::r'r' /�I I/� �ii�v'rL's�;�iiiei_._ H `'H°r„.....i _ NURSERY CHILD LIT. �8 a . _ . , ° 11....n„:41 .10I STORAGE rii: 1%ii 17n110 .rii°iCPR ATHLETIC _ •i IRli+i!1.rw:• &BRIDES 11111 �ii STORAGE LOBBY E. -- - -- _ Ni - - II�L'Y�Ii��IL i- K-3/43 IIJ�1�• w�r :airioi:� ' _ 0 �vECERr --�, n SERVING �� ,,_ :/ - - WORK RM ��❑ -- Ili WAKING 'v..J n.,in i PMC ADDITION I �J � .IIII�ii LIBRARY =- �� e b N I :revEt �ipli ,_,,• • OFF S OFF 2 OFF �___ ` ��' , L� ,-KITCHEN - n a T �, _ _ M_{_ SOCIAL HALL I 1.16 :- om E 260 1 ,— awe _u .� i OIL\ aa..nW. EXISTING PMC c RAC Wete ,O UV CH 2.9.6610666 TRASH M31•G ,1.. III' 310 ]JO Te O EMMY�I_ ST.VINCENT 1 �.I STOR z'a 1 WO it o. ery Main Floor Plan 0 A5 . C e' 17 1e eT NaeRi • PHASE II I PHASE I r . 0 • . . — ..., ,,moms. - ,. — , , .0 GYMNASIUM MECH w .. o we 0 EllBEO W m .0 0 CHAPEL Il •• 14 � U LEARNING - :: III RESOURCE CENTER - p muO o a GYMNASIUM C.)0. L ' BELOW C = COMPUTER LAB i I' a STORAGE I.�I' I Cip "' (FUTURE CORRIDOR) -•" '� — - Y7 Iiii • 1... • ART i' .' TOUTH 'E3 1111:.IY4 PP.111� MINISTRY v a �'I' •:.••:.1�,:R i OPEN 1...ih irupzi„::: BELOW m■ "FLAP'ROOF MUSIC ROOM 1iifa--" ••mi STAFF LOUNGE MEETING , CHOIR PRACTICE i"'a:iic�L�i��°.unL iii�iii� ,.,.=iiim . . .. . ammoII 11 1Imo :_ ■ 1 r.�. HIGH .: Music STORAGE Imo• O YOUTH MIN �.../. CEILING _ /, ,,./q , Illljd�� WORK RM �■ FFICE F.! linjii . 1 ue�NI 11,OFF6 MEETING I MEETING g sups. ox IIII 0. rn I ° ,00 ° +'6`10' . I MII,, 1P,1 pII ■ I ROOF BELOW LOFT HIGH CEILING AT SOCIAL HALL "FLAT"ROOF .FLAT ROOF OraWn woa e Oate mxio RaNdon HMO ... a,z , c„ �x art,. Upper Floor Plan 0 A6 o B @ lz le 3Z Nutt L mrvconn U . / /—Fla1P1GI�BPIa( vavnemru. _ /- ""E�'""'� - L smralrs� _1.1.14. TM uaau ew�ua�MoaoN -rwmronsssniccoo / ` A: . - . -. v-M.- mEnmlcco •-' ®®E;� v � .. �� ,� . s• ass•......;� - ►j .. ®®ar _ �, t.Ad , t•7,1_ 1,`h rti o�-a�a��a�s�_�aa /3�'l �__I a O ' CMPliniatik_, syy E■ ■a■. i i i ■■■r* ■■ Q .- 1 +e c i _ _ `. � �` a ■f: 'o- -- a W a a a �nN�,� E,arRaaR�aE _ . o Etdding Church 1 Raised Driveway and Socal Hall and Meeting Rooms Gymnasium New School Admin&Classes `3 a. / , p DropOff/Loading , v y North Elevation o g >,`4 Ddsting Church C • / r-o50rAEroCCO wccvcssaatco 1 _ .'I . MGM BPIIX� � COM SHINGLES�. _ o 0.' �� P - _ .. NEM _ \ - a G �a c I IEI . flyC,,, n n ❑n [ ImL aL4i> v1. — ---- 's.�.r ra.�a`rMan`oE 'EGGING E' -a.�.-r� -I GRPOE • — nuiv MFncEGM t New School Atlmin&pastas EtlsMg P.MG Social Hall and Meeting Roams Gymnasium vnm v x West Elevation East Elevation(From Raised Driveway) E 1 1141.11•1 LOG SPACE iw CO \ CHUMrO BE E p pNCC". SGREGEO!IVuwi \ ti' l 11 UM • • 1 ' 1 C-�I f I _ School passes Parish once s Section at Mechanical Loft(South Elevation) MEOISMCLLMEM Eawnn E,amuc,eatca,u WNW FnIaMGDNMO Y \ / OOMP Sre-rGt6� ElarwaffaMnOf�\. / AVG ROOFI®GN� { v- _ rWOGPAINGE r.FIKCOPPIG - -BF' SIRIGIE4 / HMO ONESnKYA�\\ - \ MGM MEM CORNa \\ /� EOM IwGiONE51RC00 flarY.G - J - l)1\J\I\ Preiettr _d' M'pIONE SNOCO by MG 41 _ — __ h AIN■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ''��I'IIY'I _ Yq ��' — — - C emumama -.°• Lrii 8- :: n ■ �d ' I__ I�+� i�si 1rMIN� i�e. +iRR - .e..e �_ -fir=:= B I�� .C.I �:�t.l}t.0 11�.�1 �1■ I if F�HaRALE, tt -,t." m m 0.k.. , - o. . SChod Cla.wt I `Esalwo rasa; 1 Erin RPMG I PotihOfi sand Meeting Social Hall Rased Drfewayand Ending Church I DropOtt/L..1g I South Elevation(From South 4th Street) Building Elevations . . Al . 8' 16' de SY 64 aiaetNn DEW. A J U + I U ., .. . .... , II: .. . , ,..,, _______ _ _Lc_ _ . , a iiii ' NE WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION we b 1 C oN 0 a vat .. moon GREY 1 OE21.2.99 _.LI 1:1:�. C eMe,rr�- ILE3:LE#,b3z��i r.Ll i t�i3ll �t 1 I L'I 1 3t]' ',: '-; r�1� EL z(r ,V _: — . { r t.I 1-i�_—emu,.__J•-I_1 _'.:I-__'. g RN LLLr11. 1 e�1 A „� '" . - e[raro ri y d cwo stoat N,rr e2w2,.-2,,,E2 EE101110 e.wicn111E 12E1e..e2w26- SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION s l•.,. . aioo ` +tom113114 I I I. /I I I z '_ena I i :4 I I I \ I I I I :Y demon 3C<onarg I CLEM I r a UTILITY .- y, I ----- .— tea,''" m J W77 1 a /111\ A I tec.ma. ,I — v \ Ill` 1 — A Z aeo.mm Freya eY, meEb 5 J 71 I n NI® a errer ►1 BEDROOM r '• e oa X --Fri — I �,4 1 ly a L SECTION A A I ¢ I wow.. ert.en more 2 PATIO I , * waa L J .,P ` /J ` EXISTING HOUSE ` FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE;VW.,, O RECTORY REMODEL&ADDITION A9 �� • LIGHTING FI T LIRE SCHEDULE F" / TYPE .IANUFACTURER&MODEL NO. VOLTS NMI AST WATTS LAM(S) DESCiIPRON MOUNTING U :,� VA.,v Q - Si iNOCO/P21=A5=1-A-FT=250H=208 208 N/A 290 (1) SOW MH POLE MOUNT SIZE LIGHT 25'STRNGHTSQUARE STEEL POLE nv,ana, � E v S2 IADCO/r21-A5-2-A-FT-23o I-20O 208 - N/A 500 (2) '"Mit (<)VOLE NOUNT SITE uSrITs 25'STRAIGHT SQUARE STEEL POLES �- , S3 HADCO#P21-AS-1-A-3-250H-208 208 N/A 29p Lt1�s5p MH POLE MOUNT SITE UGHT 25'STRAIGHT SQUARE STEEL POLE XI WIDEN EXISTING ALLEY Re•° '`"mtl LXI�f1NG ALLEY c U a. I a' RP"' G....w'• 1�CA 4. c7 fH o s o._ C.) In W Q Po..,v,. H - , ry'J, PROVIDE(2)200/59 SSITF IT.HTING O., 3 ^ Q p 1-4 Q ' CIRCUITS AND CONNECT WITH/10 AWG > u er O r 1 g PROM rTI 1�ppb\/ a PROVIDE CHANNEL THE CLOCK,PHOTOCELL AND EXISTING BUSINESS W q 0 EXISTING PORTABLE CLASSROOMS 2-POLELIG)H COATACTL RS FOR CONTROL OF ERIERIOT�' o _1' - SYMBOL LEGEND O g3,4 ' 3 00 POLE MOUNTED LIGHT z U P. CC _rz—J — - WEST PARKING LOT �•I... 1I 4 cA me LOA— S/ RPISE MECUMMECUMEXISTING PSE POWER POLE TOR -N.IM ) u DISCONNECT OVERHEAD SECE PRIM¢ IC�ji PHASE II PHASE fps, 3 HOUSES TO BE DEMOLISHED,VE'-'! i _ A•T OUS -'CH CTS ' iT LJ "u _I L_I L S D:I OLI.ION'LAN •Ri..'wz., ® ] (F•—+y1, i FIM • ,71 • . • I Fv S • N r 52 FA5T P•RKINf 10. S2 (a— r ‘S) U AK ESCAFf FOR 1 Ensnxc EXISTING PAVING VACATED PHASE I EXISTING TELONE PO TO REMAIN. NEV GYMNASIUM NSCONNECT OVERHEAD R14CE FROM S !STING PSE POWER POLETO REMOVED.PHASE I BE 4 01ICES TO RF nFMOI SHED.VERIFY +' NEV SCHOOL IDI CT OVERHEAD SERVICE FROM �4TIECTS FACILITY 1 HOUSES A D THE RECTO TO 3E '/J SITE DEMOLISION PLAN 3 • I DEMOLISHED.VER FY ECACT USE°WI r. 4� Q III AFCHTIT CTS SITE DEMO USI LM O� O I EMISTIw I %. EXISTING CHURCH ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ¢ — PAVING EQUIPMENT,120/240V,1PH,3W,250A TO EXISTING K-B SCHOOL EXISTING PSE PO R POLE TO BE DISCONNE VER . '4' L. �F4AIN,NO CHANGE In O DISCONNECT AND REM.• �� SERVICE FROM 1 HOUSES TO BE DEMO SHED,VERI EXACT G S- E IXISIINC UCh-,POLE AND MOUSE W0i ARC ITECTS SITE DEMOLISI N PLAN. o IIMME PROVIDE ADDITIVE II!!PI,'NATE TO REMOVE CONCRETE BASE � O PHASE I El �fO EXISTING PSE PO FoLr ROTH OVERNE pE NEV KINDERGARTEN ^^ .SCHOOL AND BU TELEPHONE SERVICE ONE TO EXISTING ...I f 9S mOCTI00L BUILDING&TELEPHONE SERVICE TO _ CLASSROOMS • 1 NEw EXISTING PARISH MINISTRY OFI G. EAAAND • NEY HAND HOLE OUTSIDE OF PLAY AREA AND • REEFED EXISTING SCHOOLS 12C/240V,1PH, • 3W 600A PANEL A UNDERGROI ND FROM NEW HAND HOLE AS REQUIRED USING AS MUCH rOVERH I SERVICE , RROP°SE°GOT AXON RRV. I • EXISTING CHURCH EXISTING Mq AS�TISSWIF RELOCATED { ..e VOGIII u • TELEPHONE VESTAL AS REQUIRED AND 'HP COURT [" '" CONTACT • RECONNECT EXISTING SCHOOL AND PARISH WI 'BIG TOW I _ _ PHAS:I CONTACTOR ING ® I—• a E� MINISTRY BUILDING TLTEEPONE SERVICES. GARDEN NEV PARISI-OFFICES pANEI P7 m RNSE°pgrv[vnr a ub 01-f1-W o \—rf .SU'FACE MTLINT J COURT II PANEL K7 m+�-°!C/Loa°Mc A^^�' C.ON SIDE'F BUILD NG. _I P• EL L1 PHASE 1 mu SOCIAL HALL • _ EXISTING�, EL AT EXISTING 120/208V,3PH,4W J • • 'F,•IN — o EXISTING K-8 SCHOOL 400A DISTRIBUTION PANEL _ F/[ EMOTING 121/208V, WNH 350A FEEDER.LOCATED I. • Jr SUBDISRIB ON PAN. I EXIST I. N�R S�RY • 0 WITH IHEI•�' `16ECI1�N' NEWS N DISRLIBl1TI0N ;A • LOCA�TItd'':: CENTERS PAN 1600 AMP CAPACITY MAD', 6 • PANEL M1 0208 120V,3PH,4W. EXISTING C.T. DISCONNECT EXISTING B LDING / Abossein ENCLOSURE,NO—, UG SECOND• SEAM E.REEFED I�� `•• i • �, \ �_ 0.9 CHANGE BUILDING (2)S: OF(4) .vr.m— IA E➢glllf BI7Rg �� . AIM -VI— STAFF EXISTING WALK fff NEW PANEL DP. SE' 5 PARKING .. _ - ® / I h ,os oz ?Z.,' iA /�R<,u 1 !: !';,vim EXISTING, SE NE LPB TERAMIRMER SIDEVA SEC DARY SERVICE ENTRANC 51:P I—I-I I nSI➢EWALKf d,111dv,}va l ` IEQWGI-D DEMO - AA�w xwl„1 asa RE plDiLcmV-DEkVI' EXISTING 120/240V 1PH,3W CHANGE TRANSFORMER MOUNTED TIER ISHIBUNON 04.GRAIT3 3 1844 It4111 AXE IE 600A MAIN PANEL A ON EXISTING VAULT EXISTING PSE POWER VAULT IN SIDE WALK,COORDINATE Belknm,Mi 99004 EXISTING METER TO South 4th Street WITH PSE FOR PSE TO REPLACE EXISTING VAULT WITH �i REMAIN. O CHANGE AIL DUNE OVER RATED VAULT. cn25) 62-944441 EO1.1 60' R.O.W. I SITE Pli4N ELECT-MEAL 'hll pip E-03p EI.w Na SCALE 1•-20'-0• NORM c -\ A. L. T. A. /TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 18, TWP. 23N., RNG. 5E., W.M. South Second Street CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Fg.r.1"A''''V. • South Third Street ir.li'r•4741!°?' k • ] •• l J—•., . Fir::"7:7 •. -• • • . • , I •.-' I I 7---- —T- I -I - EyFirr..-177.." 1 - -- . . 5, 1 4 I 3 2 I 1 6 1 I ' I I I " ' ". I I I .. . I I \ .. .. I I , ,:T.:2'" I I "t I I I a,.1,...-- .rEvr"" I '.t:''''-'''''''''''''-` .1.' fl .'' .\ .j.Eilliilli I... . , 1.. . ...,. 1,-„,„ .• --- I . I I Kiri277-'' I • ..:, 1 wh'•'°.,,,..:.ir:41".,... .. 1\ I.• 4, ** ••• / '" ,•:e.... - ..:,.... .-- \.7,E,m , „.1 f... .;.z.„._,........ir,::::..:-..,....„1„: .,, 1, ..,.,. .,,.. ,.„ 24 ' : '‘.1--a7. I 11;7 - 24 I " .- ' - If -- . •: II ' -, - I .:.,c, .. . . 7 .-ormr, 7 -. _ 1 , .. /-.,,. ,..ff.--,--t•- •1'—•'..-.. t.1 i ;, 7.1: ..... ' „.,.. , 11 I ;C.-).,:5.±' ' ,-.. ,E i'-..,„. --.11 ,,E1 ii . ,•••';',:i 7.,"-",......„, ..:.:-.:8. ir il'EA.Lk',A°9). ,:Ohk,,_.1 ...\,..;..:•1.\\..5...\. 2- ''''''H.-.\•,.\<.....\.. \..,\..1;•••F:..',i74:::.\\e/ji'l''..:--!:; . 8 : " : ',' 111713i 0( --7 .''''s P.: . . .' . . t. ' : I' m %:' t...nr,. i i .IFI,' -. :--',. : • ''''''4 i-x-, -___-,--__L-_-_, •• ,±- ^. ., ,? i'A, ..,,,.,. -‘) nal 22 r-. - ... a .1.1--.F\.._::!-,.:'-- - ••t-- 79,- -e. 1:-U--' .. !!d ,,', "^4•""'-'.% ..• 7:4:""' .*1 , i;73 :=....ff':,,. •'''..--, • • -... -,.. ....././r .1.7 777 . 22,::,,,j,‘,;-‘;'' • 1\"74__TII 42/„. ;1.4' 1'4: ' •---1 ''''''' I ,1 :: r' _I 1 22 cn , I.1, /,,,.. / f, ,j--....-...:..r. . .`rq- "' • C'It =1... ''''' . AVi ''''''''''''0• ,,,s,.'. '' \I— ":.t ' -.a r'-, . , , .,. i 7,9049 ,i . , ,,,,r-'4 ' . „- .' .-t •••,-- ,. ,1- -,-..:- •:__ -,_--T- ...,-.F. .. .;q I• . z- „.r!gt..`""• i - -..t.," - .' ,d-"-8'.: .... .. •. ' ....4 '1-.:7;,.. 1,' ,,;1 1 '"''''.- -'4C7/A;;A., ----. '. .- ''.° • ' .7'. -. : •. ' - - ---:1-L-''' . ------ •-,- 4' • '.. . '—77—:—.77-7.77-77 ' .71;7'7- ' ' 7.-.7-'•-if-dta--lir-i;— '' '' f.':' ---+ ''''" Pa -11±-ff Surveyor's Notes: Title Report Notes: Description: Sea papa 3 of 3. Legend: . . Surveyor's Certificate: '' .131 . iiiirkNi ,,tinignig:Pi"eit:" .-Monument found. Visited Jan.,2001 • oat,vul.e ' ireiFe'firjr4i:rylegfrtnrMirtiVtlqralleir"' V-arkent ;T.r,,,E'Ci:'3°,iii'AineigIT FE°0.4.:Vs'iS erc,NiiardtillinnrgejiB:;i:.:Hitgra -,,--tairtra mate-lira Pirrg..02iiiMiliniligIrsa;00i*:. ' ThrlEnliegill:EVNYIEF:At""r ktireditTilligirINtElit:Jiatent. f ..POW.pole -0-•Gas paint mark CO•Gas marker POSt 0 •teleohOna pole 0 •Sion si.6,0,6 box • •Mailbox . bete of Survey.January 22.2001 . research ilea been&MP... :74112,:i,'6,1',12?LSitro Basis of Bearing: '!i'l°5:55.ENT,141Etil:n4tFlaiiiit. legirdEfililti:j2h1R15:' Z 'nn:PFnii.E:fiiiE:'%17""""' 06.,,Flen'Ai MOL;IgnWinU,tge4;rrg,t:411,Zt-Tr° ASN:r.'NOTIZ56rArldVig".7";:=4:4N".:°M2glg., Vertical Datum: aai Se Benchmarks: . ... IiireBareialig6s5Men°- Scale: ..,.. rngiReF21.1digig."°!r`.:" 11-30.l8K matters. 1" = 20' . ,.,, 6 Centre ;:tjtrz.: NW-SE 18,T23N, R5E, WM ' fiC94. -41)-point.--.-- imEFirsir,EET:d":12,.... rerviEreanSF.aTI7FirOF.IhIalr E 1 Surveying etc,... .... , ....°mood, .N Larson KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 55,\-. • SHEET 1 OF 3 - ' r A. L.T.A./TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 18, TWP. 23N., RNG. 5E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON . • . PARCEL 1. IN::tr:III%;EAS!di1erIlaraq'IF:141E: 11.70E7=' -..1. .:. ‘°'''.."' ,/'/V •,0 itilicillikq 0sricav sm.mueittb . rilEr:''kg,:•"•%gt,3h.',11%%i:r2g.P2)"— ——14---%'1— '--P H7-\ '' 1 L13:_. "1 II:``12 II!as:i lig 1 il i • 1 r..Mm,g,::'271:;,,r",""n°e°-". 7.,;,1-- - ,s',1---Tnt,;,?:--,— —— --7- - ''. *2,7-...„---- —.-.-'"--:- -. '' . "' .,2:-=-/L,---'' ' •ErieitnI 7,7" . 11:V DVSPINNT.IfiniFirgianMI!!'• -s'.-=` -'.'-'1-;"".----- '-- -..-2:WI'2 71"—__.- ' -,:.:**".`r- - .' .7-;-'''t;..7.7"—-• '• --- -— PARCEL R REIFSF0e; ''126"7". . --- --- ' NN'4°.1f.j.:64211A15.45E;53g2F°:'"' „.,1 "" - ." • , '- -— .- ..- . ..—,,'. . -----7,;;.;--, ,.„. •,. .....° • Mini'°i!B^Fi:FYR;',g5gRilPig:'ign.F;t ••• ' • . 'll';:•:.''.....:7'.' f.",. ..:„ ,;.__. --• :•iP,in• .-.• '1•Irleilnot":.:r17%7:rtrg.g.T1thleq'.77T.'u .....of said Lot ft .Thence W,LUI.t2,,g; =........of—Lot e t.... A' --". '''' "Y*1-', ,:,.. ',.. •.''n;',. • . ..1 •-••:4-- 7114-1 A 2'.'1V?'''''''Z:1 1 I iii:11;.4_,---mn°2,,—; •„,_•,_..A, . .• '1 ." :1,12,7'..:PS I PARCEL bi Frieq;17--:?1. l'I'•;: .. - I 1. :I.i71!- ''':- pi0.„ I I , -nit•li, r, • PARCEL B. F:Eq:"..'. 1.1 -1. I I g . ' niitInihitFvpinin.F.FFEr..F.EIZ.,.. L 11 t,.:-; r- P•02'21...., ..T7t-';.s .. 1 t, 3.• 0),• , :°, 'I ;1.1 . °L: i 4',--1-J- I - 1.;.! netrs.,itlrrezivaini.Egzan. . -r...,.. ' .iiiFtv(-z-2,8," . ''.:I.'-,I..!: '' k I :-..ir:.: . - ,,,,1 , -,-.•ivy---.! 0. i . 1 ' ; mow:!olgia:lie,li;F:irnTinni13':;.t.. 8 2 - ' 1 I ii0.7 ' -''.•'•'7,,.. . ."- I '1. I Z . 4.4- V26.15i.F.11:1ii:getgi° .. ‘''' ii .L! : : :',••_::if44,,,M•7 --47,1:: ".''. ' r'.. !: 1 .1 nag;---'-----.':------.7---------------------li14 h ii.' L Z PARCEL 10. I I;I: : ::V.d..". 2:-.; X, :;L:;:' ...'...Z.':.':.•''''il.7ir:::"V i i . M1j."2:11n21'"In"Anl•'41'41?tY:‘:Ki in 11111t011Ly ...._}•;,. —\. :.-- . , lis:.):F.<11IPM ... MitLegii5WZgarAJ`111grio,V,tr iBiFficiE'iaRT:7gEniillEFPE55tRil55 . FE:E._,„______L__. :.,i, 8 \''‘-...„_, , . ..,)\\ .‘ • , .1.1 "' : . . --:,— ...., iiiiii, gr.,:i::: . /--- . 20 40 . 1 itailfilki:Nkl!i;eNittling. -4- —ii . istS J 1 P•'-':-• 1 ./• ''' I Scale: iEiEilIiakRFrIgrrt.!.LhiiKPm'EF.Ji,nr,V'.iiU'niY:LA:iiE,rcgLm'7ItnEit:nl9Tin,E&;FmHL:°ie`ir.iiFil.;igE:qni::cYnFFtuik'kPriioLinnvliE.omsr„s.. IFI•E71.17P.-:1"1.gv 1' I.'.,-F,r.,:,':..:.i1.rig..E-r.•-.--•9 k_- 0.6.o,e. ... AO - / • : l = 20 C' c . Legend iiEgM:IgFSE : i t;5. ' s. /'- .-Monument found VISIted Jan.1,2001 ..Fa,false M11 I . ir.onninnt.:F4113341FhCEry94E:411""n'I°43 I'' . E .. .' in--mainrri.rate-lire 0-Power pole IBRIGIIFI:12EnR111rE124:01Eria;POtri . 52.scheet sfynal IunetIon box paint mark IC.Gas marker post E:11.nIF:In IFF1;111n271111PInt1JILInr4:11r: .,1 --' Id-Telephone pinetIon box FIREFAIIF:E274:iniilliiirlilgenint;'2. I . I I 0•TelephOne pole 0 •Slfln 1 iial.=.7-'-'1` -... ''." --1 0•Signal box I I 0-Mailbox . liq•hrnrctreEEiiiitnPegg[1:e7n1OVIVCorPTNerbage I . 55 2TIBROF0EUr111;74:01FELEFERigiilt;2. ' NW-SE 18 T23N, R5E, WM S )%Ce `7.:14:ii: „,,,,. :n n, -v.....,4.;,-Pointe . ET:.'rS.F"eiiiit. 1/4,, 1 —.:..p. Surveyinga KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON n'or 1.:..:;;: SHEET 3 OF 3 i A.L.T. A./TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY • A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 18, TWP. 23N.. RNG. 5E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ... -,--' - • • ,......, . . Match line, .. '' ill---- •'''4- .• ' ' - . --/ 4, ' ', ' - ,..,.• ...'.- .-- ;'-t-"....7--- ,---4'',;-- -.' '''''' i CL1---F.+1-(:: ., 4-1-, IL L....•e... • ••• . .. . "' k''..,-.7,'"---rz-c72. .:. _ .. ...• °"•"'".".C:,4 tr, -. i/- .: -.' '-' •,.* .: -i .f : .: • •r; :' "'II;1,.-• ,• /' 2L EM' • ••• i'-.• .:-...': ..•.,. . ' 4 . gli:::... . ''" - 1, .....%,..7.L __••-- 1 ' -4. - , .1' • 2..0."''.. "' '''''' ; E.,......• /.,.1-7,..:.„a.,,ar-e, - ... ., . , .I.., „.....!:--t• i._:b::.. ...L , , „. _._ ___. _11 11_:...,• ,,.,. ., -••.__. _ -.• ,.._ -___ .F.-. ! , :,F..., :•.'•.t... . 4. .,., I i 1 '.1.- -' .. .'- ....* •. 11 I ':, '\-- ' • • . I L.,1.•• -. .-.:- ••....' ''• ...•?. .:1 , ., .• . ..'• . 17,4' :. : . N.'. •'. 7.-- •":/. '" . ;•• ,-I A ' .,/•..• • L'? ,-:'. ;,:i'' ..." ....' .. ',.--r; ...• /-..•••••• &".!.;-:•-' 1 g EnEr*' ,...-. • 1 , , !, , . • .? • . . .: - • ? :•• !, ..I‘ . ./1"413) n,,,,,,,,. \ I .I • . . /g • • "'' l''''-----• • • ' g i ''.i .'''''. . r' 18 -Z.:: '' - •. - •• / ,,,•:. ... i::: , ••N t• . . . . .• .,. . R . .• I. . . ,:•un.. 1 20 .....,17 2' • e"'•- e 22.• ••.." .,, ' ., - "-.. ... .. . . ..• . : . ••.. • 4 1 - -P - irv,,,,,,:: ,.. , - :. 1 ;4).z.. -- . -V.(////.////.2:, L,i.- , .. Li.:.. ..i,:., ‘ ../.. .:'. ,., . ,.•,,. . ' . .' . 2 2.I. • , . \ ,1 •,• "......,•---;----i------''*:0•'''';' •:*. 4 •.' ''. I 18 1 '-fi'2itt ''' •7. 2 ' Ir' tif-; ::'7:1,..1?:;::'1 ••, 1 ': -- .VA • :: k;l"...;,...'.. , .• ' * .•. * *'. 0 ..•• S l 02 7.13 • -. . . ,... 0.' • . • a ''•• E • ''' 8l4S.417....- • •• .. ei- .....- 1 • 'i . cr... ,..,....\ 7\-\. • . n a ...:: I... ._' ''''''•'''-''.. . P•12.28"ra••••• . °EXE:41,r :.. ''.- ..-..--'I 1111:..::'';:'!;:"%:^.;,t..:.::1;;/ ...T.3 '. 7 :,- .., . 011.2M2.."•2!;• ' I -. i... r'":•-. cas.710' Warne WEI,'srer . i fif..; ', 1: 14. : I ' ...77 ''''•. ' ''''' :"..--".•--Pmr ''''.1.:.' '':: ' ;-:!;:tJ I . 2. ;'::1,-.j9.-- '' .fl_ri • :,... " ' -,I' - es -1 1 • • . - - • ' 1 I • • . • 17 1 . ..,.• ... ... :11..,, :•:., ., '''e," . LlEariceRthror --=- i•*• • ,.W',. ,•.t•c.t°,:. 7-1 '14 I • ._ 4. .. r....r 1"2-9'.— — — -4-, — .— '-.' i 2::9,91'" ,,,. -1,.. 1 , ';-;4 :, , •• 2E, 1 ''' •:::' % .5 icmc I zo s 1 ;::160fol,..;' / PrEN•32:• :1.• 1:-..''."Tti.o 'IC. ,.-'•0 • ,..r,,.„..,.,„,,,, 0. 1 ' .. 1'.••'''.\ 4 -' ,. - . :•'... N 1 ::... `.' ;/ - if1%.22." 15 ,r . ,. . . „,, •• ,••• 1 ,-.<.1.shi....)i....:. ''""''." 1\ '1:: .,..., : ".. •• ,',',. Poo',,,, ••‘•'. • I ' • 1,, VIZ 8'52 N \ I 7 ,..4114.....:-. • . . , .....,w ' '''' ''-' f-=I• '-' -I ' -..w.- -v v 1-. .,z..- - ( 1 :.,,......„_ 4.-.-::.a,...'.-0,';1•...- 0 '''rj:,;ht'IA', 6n'.•°'` - ,0,— st ..:„ ,_--..._,...:,....,?:crw.•!::':',.1.., •,.. -;;,..!!...-...„..7.;,F. 'fir, A F01,71174,.,' '''‘.1-.y ,r1 1 ,..:,_282-. 11MNIN,,i'.•.:M":.:.;•:::,:f;;••577.°:.ri.n"...,'"I'-.V'",,"...,,7*. ::;.^°•'' , ",:„ 1 '-1;f•Npia•in:,-,,,,:.:.;:;'1'.''-:'.° "-git2a22....:',.-..-Et,S2.:-11 '.-:'7.' . . -; ",!";•'-,-. , • A . r _ - - - --- -- - -- - '•--%' ---- - -- 1 EFT:,,„E •I ' rAnf , - -...,.., ...._ . -1 _ _ _Fourth Stree , , , -...... ..-artet-le 40,4 54— — --- -,.::,.--.. 2,4t fi..--,',., ---— -2 ' '''''''''" /.4 IN ..1 f i''''' —... —• ' - ...MSS 0 0 II 1.21 I ,.• • kinr¢i'"•••••:“ ' i / ,•r•.-'., .„, . 1 • .. -...„ ' •A ,,i,„ , ,,,...,.:vg,:.....i,.....:7,...,...-:.::....rig.,.,:••c:.1;,),Til;•7.7-',':V-`77.:4:,..::,.'..'; -:,...-::7.,...,...°......,:-.1...,,:zigiii- , ".!!..".ef,,,....i.,r!..5-4k i.:..... ..-::...,:,...7...:-.,........,f...4r4,-....t.gp:,57.ur..:......,..•..,.."...:fl,.-,: ......„....... .. —pp. , ..,.....,., •• •0 .. irs.7.7-77" .,.....I r?:7 **".)-'7'7 6Illa:T„..... . t..., .., •-• .,.6'1°,7,,,;'' . 2,P•:e`1:Nil:I 2,"c2.2ele ee.rs n Pv. Riiele is si ris I '1.1.. , •.::S '61,:, if-f-',4111E1 Fon=— , • nn,%.-.• ;:.•• 2;.°L.Z'zr•I"03 n : ' '. . South Siflreet ; .•c'...E 3°.. 1 I rl.,' 7 I i Legend: ...Or, 101144 .-Street sionel junction 00. I 0 00 ao 'e -Sign f . . Centre =L.:rnr.1 '''''''' NW-SE 18,T23N, R5E, WM Scale: 'iss' t-.,,. _otIN p hate R').4 '''' "'"' Pacll lc Ensineerin3 e-'as wt.in title Report metes , in = 20' , Surveying 4800 S.Mtn Street.Suite 360 • % i!...1 Seattle.MA 98188 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ''''''''------. ••• I'-20. .••••1266 , SHEET 2 OF 3 . 0 _ L r\ � II 3 m. �.. aW T( ¢., +- / � °' Li a 1111111 ViT III � , � � � , 11 �a C . Q DETAIL SECTION OF TRASH ENCLOSURE j Y i 1E3 • Iill Dig _ I fl II / fl INN, 1 ,,., , ! I .',-,i.-7 I 1 . \ .,o �• il.„ ,- .. ,- , ,,. .... DETAIL ELEVATION OF TRASH ENCLOSURE Detailed Elevations A8 o z r e• r ta• sAmw Pii! .� : `- wY„�✓ •F • 3.:.` �� i.�qti'A;z;:� 13d'[� ax >\\ s < t > ,' �: ...::::', y � .:: : ,.',:per.. F 'ti 3,....: 6,, .. ; , � ' �„`Ar„ L< / • • .....L.. .< 1 } a ,,a F : a":,: •• a••.:,.:„ 0 ---. '-- E c. ..is:X: , x: :ti . \`'- � u•& "ar:, o . .a 4. .x:� ..:?,. w .''a,'. ,' '..t� '.. :... ", � '.,.,.`.n. ' .. : x• »a :x f /t� i:. ., . . > s ,::i • \'• . i `a :. `"i,i. g vf x Y; fi)�104�hF 0 .t, 4 a„• • • • xr;x Y Lki::i i" i, .: \•..:; ;fk :a✓ ' t . •V'\¢ ; , d'% <. F%k , , �Y ,..�ek d:..iT L —. i ' `. .Z _ ';Fv • ,.‘ , .5.:,41„..;„ , „,..,„J:,:,,,:,!:„„:1,..:. ,....... ,..x.,......,,.,,,wils ,,,,.,:, : ,.,.„,: •,,, > y o ... > � r�N ... i .: ........ r.:.: y c".:-)I 3;t .�:::fEEj`..,I<e..,„5„;,,g,:,..,1'...-..L <. pr • • �-; . < . ,:'.. ?` _ :.. € :. Viz,.;;. ::�� , • • +< .. .. .;:a��.<e<.• , F•��'�.K,'e+, �'a,,,,�,,,`,\r„�, :S:a.,,,•:<; .Via`..;,. % 'f�k<��{,f ¢'<s +3 „��i... • 4. �' '.... �... '. ��`�i., �,7.fiii i..x' r`c.`.a: . .. . ' a ��g, .,,sue.. • i;�:: .a U ��. ` .��y�%y<.g�<,c. ;w' '; .: 'y'<<: :.: ..:.r:x� Q�„� � .:.i> .Y �.�',V.< vS:: ,.2r:?.�::c:;n .......:..... • ^,::<2• .Pnv :.?' \,.� ?F ::#^ `: `: .z�FAr<' ;j ai : • .,.,.gip `. t• ., hY«o-,k,;.' .<Si,"�f` .. , PPPP <+ , • • • 5 F l c<�. � ;``V a > Yx�` • i4t i� f ,./ ..; :.. •4:*,i.pl: ' - ,,,,,,„,•••:„:.v...''.;;•;:4.• ii rem P.: o >" <y 'Fi •i .w.� C, MS>y ;A `x;:.,;i. %.i:i :tea ` .*It \ ;� ;; , `a,,'a,>�33#'�::`� , `� i �i • ��4 9 ��..� ^Fµµ.T'. } -, `x k: 2 ,....:.:x 'rs,�y i a ... i •. . . . . < • irl".. ,... :"«'< ,i� 3;7( `„`5,..fAZ:0 4^' .•3.-'<;,i i+.:,•:.,£;.:....2;.\}E`wv•> .. • • ,..., ,:7.,,:::::;.,,.7t,,:,:.,;::!,....i.::.,...,-,,,....,,,,..... :.71"*". ',4:;...,y..;,!,,I,v.::.,!!'!%.4:•••1:_t: :;.:277.":::. „ • . �y f z ;Y pyg^ T, :..:::.�'k;J 3<fit , .' y .. .4¢ « :,. xrtk7`�.j::ia ' 'r `• ` „xR;Ge:. E <....... a, °' 4'. r � �x":: , .°'3,j -fir "» . .a... .<.� ,.,. .'�.;�;.i�:�!` v> . x itmliktpc... :' +i�xd';;,, F.:..J[,;e'iv«V.,g' • • `x.a:;,::::' ,*w - il': ...:.. �:.::a. ':'� .5'::F �..§ �::ai: a?:.`i�� 'fx�` if '.:tt. rr .<;1 -,, i �,¢ Y�:i >>•,3:�4'4 .'7 .a.v -3 ".,' i. :� x.,v+tkit.: Y' • '¢ ��> . ter':: s'. : ...�.< ;,::, ... ,<^,. � .. ,; is° ,a �. .,.. t..£ :::::.� �; ,is i4. rfp �\.'X��. :`z.s 3 �,.}.�Y^:^.¢v �.x mnrm:^,;. :;.: , ^¢� .. s•wF'f.� ,,,# . .\,:...: Yw:"'der• �� ,".x -g. �' .. M� � r�rrk :.�x;''�.�.4 'xx ' x: ter. �:::.:::..... � p,. :x .:� ,'.. Y .,... ."� nii ...ax.:. �;'iiE 'i:.x• �,:��' fitartt,i�„ �'��{:`ts, �: qi, , ,a, ..R•»�. .:Yift".�\�a..t. ...,..... 3.;.^ \�;a, .�.,` �' �..`Z a\ ,*'i A «:::.:.,. ,.4...:`;` :, n„ r � , .'S::xu ::iii' :!�"aa::.:;.i :.•� w!;i } i;�''"aF.< . .. ..p� .....� ;S,F;.-.Y. `<F aaY:E': '' : � �.1kt'' 4. ..Ym z.;.a .�� ..:•a x�r� •}:•.F;:. ^T'r' .. �a\",a`.,,,<°+p..'' .F :`�'� '�'.�:.. �:..:i �' ^1 ay.' ::,:�'.: x: ..F:. k a ;,:x., 1, . .. ..�� fl .44-47 <rrsw.3E`h".� $,s. S N--;, �.<,�:,: '' ;`.:t Y. S�`':�.�'� I � e.a< :.ti � L, - ,:'�s:E:: ? v3 eau 's:s!:: :' "" „ . :..: .:. xf' ..;,\^: 's: : ". - ;...,: ...✓.ass ir,,',ua. -,„, �vai# � ':'r.': ,,,, ;v. i:i a, > ..-Y x . F ...,• •N.`•..:;;• ::':-.,.:`,:.vt. xS'.',)>> ':.S'va `` ,if'S" < M };�'°:<:. a•..' a:`•�"'Zi,?¢<fY, e ,-, •'� �'''`'�', �,.,�'.. k \aaa:.,,,;K' ��"3�:� �1��t n<:�`ix-'st � Y �� Y��kii•sc • �><° '• ",.." .„ „:r `• a� _. L.,,..,,,.,:.„:„:,,: :`�:�:��. ::i�' «:.,11 lad .. :. ;: ; « > z <..::'�....,. i >s',^,,,,:>.-.< v 11 , ,Hi. s,.- > � x .. -3 . .§. ,``C.r:.< o.Ex ro'rur r---1ee rb ro eE SShlr 1 � mx wsmc xur lo:.'-ar _vmn,�(� miey r� r Lli�A N T t 1.2 E N,D r• • €�. a „.�O'Eslettq Tree tomRemat i;+� No d E.letln9 Tree to be Removed Eramo�E3e 53 s 10 t _ uxuxx PENCE 55.,irk L .j1 Proposed Street TreeRESIOM - - - row .((PCSanaeEe PLAY uu uo ,<�! s .e Easx pwxm �' 4 Omamantal'bin Tree / l sow M MOMS FOR w i _ i W4 Narro.Cenlbr Tree v CARS ti._ f+: ® Screen Shrub(Pyron,dalle) W urz sr {III, --,van _ " q3 anamenla snn,be/ t° ° Croundeovm Seda ° '17=1 III I I m 1 •�•:�- - _ �_ �._..__ _ Pow�we.;xa / alp:.,, .. m m,e�wm.5 xmaEe n�eF e�,=r Pee ��ea�e�a , �,��wE,rus BENCH � �� ,.sr u�w E� F. NOMME•pl —I1 1 I I mn I 1 I 1 I I I I_I 1�rltAi�.�` �.�,.,, I 1 ' - = ..7 4.._.:: i�_ .;" N >, 4:11 0 ue FLAGSTONE PAVING ° [ � 'I a Jr :.. u daaa •!..6.;6113.,iii eE.t • i Qau.1E1 _ T i To' xN 1 EASING SCHOOL 1 NEM 1 ' ..i*Mil IRIR14 '1,. IIN 4111111.d.L. TIP M z� p e ♦•♦♦•v e a EMS.CHUM ,_ /lllllNll :, ::mill P II �.b.J�ti. .. !�A.:W:. jA p.,EN. Io dR`1 gi 'tea"E",�aE..Nw:eaoE e-0,14: I�__1 IOro - s<aPE�::•■"IEN'.•.wc ''s •{�:� may,... .�.�,,,.I� ,�n�r � e •��ki �} * a —^ n- Er= I E till 1„ m�Eem„P�j -- PROPOSED Ir.ismEEr South 4th Street `. South 4th Street rn ' 3 �^ . ., wWr am .sE . ., .-� J 0J 3sa1 sF. !'. .OSF ?c'n:gper VAIIM • \ Os 2005 0 seta" P ya,s=ee,120 .�_ — - Ate., m Evoenc. deb $/ r try. FK4NK.t t, R .ee causewo Significant Tree Removal Plan a, pj / L3.0O056 0' i-Pk , P.7 • OWNER TO ADJUST PROPERTY UNE 4•-0'TO THE SOUTHATO ww., - 0 NMI EXISTING ALLEY TO 24•-0'TOTAL WIDTH l6 alley .s P L A N T L E G E N D i_ __ E_ °y`° rP° Symbol. Plant Name/Remarks G►' r•.:. �. .. ._E •. °..o. a a Existing Tree Po...�. a g- a V7 ittI Proposed Street Tree ,w CHAINUNK FENCE- 14R' ' �^' .,'4�i--f' Omamental Garden Tree G o •- E%IEDNA TERTCOMP TO ON 'ff• Narrow Conifer Tree ••b S O REMOVED — A-TER COMPLETION OF ,al war o EXISTING BUSINESS '.. [L Q PHASE PARKIN FOR 22 ADDITIONAL;ARS(RDCONFlGURE 8 PLAY AREA AND �F' 3 It �� Screen Shrub (Pyramldalls) QC1 �--� 'fir SFgWN BE OW) ---PARKING FOR 50 - �e '}V� „a, O CARS 1312 S.F. -C �... '- Ornamental Shrubs/ w Groundcover Beds °1 '0.. RAISED DECORATIVE ]a U ' PAVEMENT Lawn . I] 41 ,411 ' - . . 1/41 E l[ BL o o m� m� o ±� .��.t\•� 106 S.F. 101 S.F. PARKING FOR 9624 S.F.PKG. P° PLAYGROUND&PARKING 11664 SE FKf . '1J FlRE LANE FOR 19 CARS AND VAN 4 .Y• v 1 PARKING FOR LANDSCAPE REQUIRED:895 SF 29 compact LAND6GAFi'REQUIRED:4"IT 8F. FIRE LANE LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:1106 9F.1 . ACCESSIBLE STALLS 2 ACG BENCH a d • ,�� ,•�� 2 CARS LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:14rD6 9F. CARS 1174 S.F.SF b m g. i �w�� +�a�� %_'�� a1��1 ��r=13 Via. . ro 11 !' I IIIUr, �_� o o 71.I,�,rf�n • .1 ) 1106 SF. I;. 11 I I I I-I L I A I I lII I I I I r ■ �1•' ' ,T. II \ 4y;s-l jiAOi� �4 yy'i7 pp��ipye fl si b'�> rr ° I;. r N PHASE II FLAGSTONE PAVING '• 8:885.0.98+; ;3 NEW ' .............................. ':` E T[ SCHOOL r V. yyy Q 1 7 FACILITY _L...SI °L 6 ACC ,,...>.....,...a.. r• ppp y &le' &AP -' S.F. 41 p y�.`-�1/ EXISTING LANDSCAPE • yi CL/] � 41• -�� TO REMAIN ! EXISTING SCHOOL IJ �. 'I"l'M""'"_P ! � h,N5' ,111_ __ ..._._ - 1Emserogil mir,.. ,,,,,,347, ...,4mialimr — I gii I � PHASE I - War ' 1 `� z _ 1 tc e. Q NEW SOCIAL HALL. 11111,1�� `.♦•\��A• ..1,,„0„„,, i . `� GYMNASIUM AND 11111W.11 , J��LEY,1 K,eN Via•,OY •CULPTURE TYP. �'^ ARISH OFFICE , y S, „��'V CONC.BOLLARD �+ S°" FOUNT ;•• u_`. ♦`�/J,��', 6'0'O.C. TYP. V VL CONC.SEAT 4L]-`•' '.�•�° I • G EXISTING CHURCH WALL •ATERBO • ••I a / ...,...:._�.. , .,i.�NI CONC.BOLLA•-D '".. GATE ..yi l__ Ct l� ►� x 'f111111111 ��♦�� J G SCULPTURE OR A°a te 6Y E I LNG T q°,w 6.0'O.C. i ( a FOUNTAIN dL .a I} :=. ALL �.♦♦ O cQi a ., ." •a• RAISED DECO'•"TIVE • ♦ ° • :If : `. J � 2c - ' � PA MENT IL/Mk.. ..,, - ) ',1f, •Tw�% .rpgt mma u ,,,,, y,a !ha. 'Willi .FF �� z O [�!.'� .t- �¢ .term Taeaal Sb- _'l .� \ 4:ya► �: a - I ^�,�►� .ors Wo 1.0n0.0P.Arcnl.ot r EXISTI G LA DSCAPE INCLNG _ ` Rotondo E%ISTING LANDSCAPE BENCH �.I ❑TO REMAIN o�� FI '•�_< TO REMAIN /�^—� y(., TYP. Ii � 3 ..rrP' °�.{ -1 �1 ,� z 6100 I m fl 'mme GRAIN LINK FFNCE .w:Y SIDEWAL A° , �I N.. OEW °y(n.°.e'c '.s�, I�� f tzex°. 206 ` II `"'•W/PLASTIC SLATS R glik- ••a+ .. • a:'.••• creme 7 Aim EXISTING STREET PROPOSED STREET TREE TO BE Deb�• »em main campus "" TREE( ) South 4th Street TREE( .) REMOVED Payload, 00.6.0m \ Landscape Development Plan Main Campus (phase I and II) L2.0 o ® CITY OF RENTON '�-- s =� -' :; i i` �pTT� �� o�rPlanning/Building/Public Works �' F a : MAY23%12 �:is ® 3Z Z * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055CS ..P;, . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 011 a"° 7123839. U.S. POSTAGE : 783930-0180-08 I RUSSELL i. OIS 3i / 39 © , 1481+5 SE 224TH / cJ \1t7999 �, KEN WAA 98031 % ' =:- ii,lii1iii }1i:..iiiiiili1i:':lit . J' t t ' ilm t t i t t t t t t lt� 1 �' ��.��:.s' �� .r t lr ea J1iJJ Jit J tJ Jii Ji r at J J sJ:/ 0 CITY OF RENTON sal Planning/Building/Public Works isi 40' 't low. ATI • lid rpyjli 0 NAY 2 3'0 2 re'i."0 h '''' " " 0 3 22 ' * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 Sp. • elD • al 1111.9.9.1 0 * SZ CC • &it PB METIER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED , ; 3123839 U.S. POSTAGE I, 783930-0190-06 CA5TANEDA HOMERU 099999 ; 1+00 5t1 1 THER 5 AVE S I RENTON WA 98055 jDfIESS et,ri ..,_ '(`D -. ,,- c.1.1 i RETUr-lii 75 iENDF::-1 ,\(.,.... VI a It lidiftvi...81.5.:::.,zr...2. 1111111111illijilitli11111111 iiinbililliiiiiiiiiluithiltni 413-11.` i 0 CITY OF RENTON .%,,_7„kT;:.....,..„....i..,2. 4721.„,.....awr MIHNI.M1............. 111• t .02 e • 4.. Sligo. "4: ' , * IA Planning/Building/Public Works 4-1"j . *Ofiroei 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 N 2 3'0 2 . " 3 g C * 10.it • . PB METEPI '* ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED . ) 1 - 7123839 US. PosTAGE 7 83 9 80-0 1 1 5-0 7 ' -•• THUMLERT BARBARA ELLEN 871002 ., 17576 12TH NE ''.02 -SEATTLE 'WA 98155 05q ) (scP , . i . .. . ...,.,....„ „.„..A..„.„.„ _.4 • ....,,,,, , .! ,kv„ „ 0., .. ,, . .. . . " .. . . _. . ., ' • • . C ild u) • , . , ' • - i i-E1-1,1Ri-'4 ID SENDER 6 ,,,,-,7 , „,„„ ,,,, I -.411 I Hi.. 1 i 4/ # A ti.11"1:115IX573WF42:a14. 2 'i. lilt II i Mt' i ii i iii ,ill I 1.1111-34, ?Ifilli!-/ifill'11.i'l • • '-'' ' . .' 311- , „ p CITY OF RENTON : :TT ., ' ti •.LL Planning/Building/Public Works 5 �� ; * If 1055 South GradyWayRenton Washington 98055 :Ft., .~ ®3 2 g * - 0v MAY 2 3'0 2 i IA . cm PB ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a� r► * I- 7123839 U.S. possAc� 783980-0050-04 - GRIFFITH GREGORY M 9 310 MORRIS AVE 5 8 U7 1 10C)k\ RENTON WA 6075 055 �� I t f 1.7)F-1 Ei:`'..-S r F Q-1 k A v A 64, 1 �______._.»—_________ *F;7 4 -AL Sc' .gS s,_ nilll111itlig1111111;i,:II14111 t,I illAriaialibilifil **Tj ***.******* 3-e4- 3ATCH NuMi3ER : .%AmEUP c4rHuLic . . . . SctCOMMEWIS • ' • .-- - - - - -- - - - 0007,z0-0003-0 COOKS 2.7P MAf--1T 'DJ SA SUASET LLVD REATON AA 3007;20-0J54-04 SANjJYb Pcd,NA M :.301oziJ) 723 5HAfTuCK OV 3 RENIUN 96(.; CJ0720-0000-A ore ' CTS3J3 /J UFFIC OF IHE ' TIVE jiA 303 31/4 71-,1 31 A.21 '')3J35 Nt. SEs P+HJUN::3 I "(4n 7259 S 5t.PiNYCf.:61- RiJ 3,±4FTL-. 1/2A P r HjuA..; I • 9611i i J7:1227 Cji LLPi;,jP TAX z.LVJD DIL j .; • ''iCL,MAL5 A+RO5,7f'jA iTi ST ':)3555 CifY OF RE.W&•,,; AAY LEP.6AT ALJO L051072 S ST • • i1 AA 9.305 D'..)J7LO-0157-3-3 - SCi MANANT COAP 741039 6TH 4=1._ 4,20 POix D.LPT U129ALLE'4 PAKAAY H.JuSTON1 Ti LL6HTFJOT C - 593J1--3 3-3J ISLA,\JL CRE5T W4Y MEr:C :X *1.1 ,JCIJ-Lf.j.)-(J173-03 Al-A0ERT 21t, NA Jim 5T rf.zNT,..1% AA 930.5-5 • - . . SCI MANAA• EMEAT COr0 . 74160,9 3Tri FL 4, ,--.7)20 Pi:OP IAA .) PT iir.9 ALLEH PAr;KAAY riUUSTUN TA 77019 0007,20-0163-03 CITY l-iF .32ATTLE SPU 95074. 4.EAL P!',-;j? — 'ATr, 710 c: 'di AVE IC)TH FLOOR SEATTLE WA 98134 . . 1.62 . --4113—J6 KiNL; CJJMY HJ3PITAL DIST 1062274 C/,j TH4M4i',1 ERIC 4C.Q 3 42)= 1.) 31 —. . P,EJTON AA 550 7. 3 —..j1D.D--)J ZANDT JJmoi ALVI,2,4 TTL,E ed!, -J61.10 763J—J1.6. 7 1 ,4AY-A - N .Y . . . . 7J : 17 ) ), -HI ,,,: ::= ItTi1JY .3I,,-.. ... 7 11 -, F,1 AV SE Kl.. i- --\ . • . . . • • 763i5t2—u175-0_:, jJ •: HN AV ;4A b_J95jD KEAT AA 7D .;5i.50-3.135—,)3 HE,,U:1A1 4-)t) 5PUTHE5 4VE ,cEM-,JA 13350-01:JJ— C6FA:'4E34 HOMERj qUO 5MITHE15 AVE 5 A2-1 L31.-JGE AENTuA AC.; 3 I U u F 339999 SMLIF5 AVE F.E' TJA siA 93,',15D • 735-.53 -02615—J2 FNKEL MICHAEL b (JD )991:i Fu .60X 2 ,•173 • TULuCA LAKLE • • 7639 :Y0-029J-05 OICKSUN rUICHARO 21999 '9 5752 1')7TH • NMOR5 AA 733930-02'95-00 3ASUaTTE r:.AI5NA ANA 36-29q9 3,!0 SNITHA3 AVE 5 i.ENI-UN AA 9b055 73530—'3330—".fl CZ' GOLLIR TYYJ ' ± t? PU i3GA , TUN AA ./(* ) AriNG xfrAi r L. 1417,3 C/ J KINj Pi "JUA 6056-f; c,:x41 cNT LLC Hi 1:5UA 3J3J3 .34FTLI-1= AA • 3 zwX J-112INa H:EF.NA aar.) ,AVE- S F :1-NTuN ;JA ria,Jas 2-:,q ,AA ELLEN 17a7t., 1,L1'F.1 NE 5,ATrLa Ae-1 L1 Uj .1.1-NADINE E SMITHES AVE SOUTH X :NTUN NA jULUAES A 1799 • :446 IN.LE 41 a aEi-kTTLE 9E,116 783'1.30-013u—U3 JUHNSUN J-tY N JULI A 400611 1.6 SE 17JTH aT i.ENTUN NA 7E39 —uj3a—J3 LOEbE DAVID A PO bOA j -4'3 :cNTON 9F,c_LI7 • 136'15U-014U-3D AwAikENE5.5 LL U <Ci 97777 311 mENT3N WA 95035 c.f.E6IS FERN .1.5'1o4 NE 151H ST :. ELLEVu A 95006 FEAN E j2i) -fl'j i59's4 NE 13TH ST iLLEVJE W4 7.5 -00-3S-0s ANTLAiLifr:LCA'r(UA L 13'991-) ' MITHES AVE s AA Pij.A3AL 11A-mt.:NijAA+6 .1.JMA s39999 3,3 ;4vE • N1LLIA'4 CO .) x.2kf NKIN JOHN r-0-PATRICIA A E1- 9599)9 • 42.6 6 SKD ST 733'560-:)03'3-J4 Er-F [ filATAt JU99-iLi r c 15.)S 980-37 M 3L0 MORRIS AVE RtNTO,‘I 96LULI '35'6 SHAV4ON .1. 4001 i'719 l'qE 41H Cr ; c-NrJA, 94O56 7633-0060-02 riOLLL,ND OANIEL Ji-IALMA C 17-3'9j9 mJAAI3 AV *.305S 73396U-job5-,37 TAYLO(i FRACI. '4E E J 93 • 733960-1.A70-0J LITTUN LJA 43;13 LUJP CENTAAL Dr&IVE HUU5TON TX 77jo1 76.396J-0073-015 6EVERLY J MiSR:-:IS AVE 5 14.F..NTUN AA 9335'5 srin 7.33'J3J-f.)-330-J6 7-:$7>) aft, 3N27+3 .9'>? m3a,-(13 AVE s ;TON ,AA A\ 72,-J63-0J35-)3 HANSEN LINLA LURkALNE 340 Mt:JiS AVE 5 , ENTJA AA P A -64,t• ST ti-lj : Nc. A J41 AtE 5 AA 740.50-0020-09 .DARi,,V1EA L C - JOHN MEI.N1959999 • E421 6,-rTri AVE sE l 'SLANI) WA • 7stiO3u—,DUS0-37 MEHTALA MICHAEL+REISECCA 745021 iuS32 SE 149TH AEATON WA 9.30s9 764330—UO3D-3 PAMPOoKAS EVAN6ELOS 2.9094.3 PAMPUUKAS ANATA3HIA 16432 39TH AVE 5 5Ei;TTLE AA 96166 7.04030-0.3,1O-0:S WAMBACH JAM'ES MAALENE A391459 (.1)1 HAUSWEA wMY RENTON WA 9'2)053 764.030-0J4S—OU GEISENINI EDO P+KGMAR BONNIE/479999 PG £ UX s371 AELAJNOO AA 93034 764U60—o003—J7 THARP JOHA Di-JULIET R S55999 THJMAs AVE SOUTHWEST • RENTON W4 96O3'.L.T • (64'30U-kJOIU-JU SULLIVAN JAMEL E 3911 ..) 1U LOX 415 S 3RD 5T • iENTON WA 9J057 7.64060-00—JO SOUTm Ti ST ; SC 462513 41's s ThIRD ST• RENTON wA ' 960OS 764060—G03D-06 40 KLEIN THEOJOR3 741O MERIOL4N SEATTL:3 AA N,;".; 7o4060-0Ji3- 1 KLEIN THEJUORE 74iO N SE,=,TILE 7,S4J,sD-1..04 )—u4 ALDD 3 J.i T osc--NTuN . 5r , & rJ ALJO 1Nz_ 77.3 3R:j Si A4 4j-U1Uu-Ui SPLACE. GP. G23'cf W 7 1JrrLV ft;I:AlLIN AA ',46L1DD • 76:4U!50-J105-0:5 Cu ?0fii_iN OF: rHE CATHJLiC.,.-L3991 • M4i'..E:N 3T 3LATFLE AA 9,3L34 76430-131ij-i9 CURPIT.LJN JE THCATmJLIC2.39999 910 MARION ST • 4itLtAA 931J4 • / 34U60-0115-IJ4 bc_NER M LFJ P5399,.1 313 MOIRIRI3 S RENTON AA '96035 30ZARTH L. 219 -II99 130X 170'.) StATTL. NA -13111 76qU607012Li-a2 ILHILIJN PAUL 4i-3UI=ILLEN 19703 1ST 3 N MADY PARK INA 9146 • 750-01.30—J5 tHUMPSON LiLLIAN E 403 Mjis AVE 3 RENTJN WA 96033 7:54060-0135-00 NURDSTRDM CARL R & MA .LAN HL91262 MOitrtI AVE 5 . RENT0N WA 93035 7640s0-01b3-03 CAYCE KAMERJ L2069 29013 2291H AVE SE 'SLACK DIA;10ND WA 93010 7640.30-0173-06 CAYCE KAMER,JN C+TERRI 2.206t5-3 201.3 2Z91H AVE 5E sLACK DIAMjA,L) wA 95010 • 7S,t0E,0-3173-01 0L0J J • 364j75 3 AHIFAJRIH AVI± AA i1L LL,AY .,, 11. 1-A,JTH AV KASALNi) ANN 7157 )2 4i6 wilLiA3i),TH AVE 5 - i-',ENTU:•4 w4 16403j-:"..)223-0s H1u6iN3 6t: LD 3- -KELLY ANN 77'.999 4-17 wHITWJATH AVE 5 tRENTN ,A1A - 963.5LS • 7030-k)22 -J1 AELSm GLEAN A FAMILY TUST o299 -) t�iwHITAORTH AVE 5 i'- i-NTON AA 960'5 KENNUIN BRIAN Pl-tiOLLUAAY-KEN179999 347) S i---12NO ST SEATTLE AA 9517i 73-pJ3j-0235-U9 TGRKELsjN EjwAkii R 1100 IJIr AVE S SEATTLE wA317 7,5-iD6o-u2,+5-j7 whITLjCK KAFJRD L+VJNNIE 3 16999-1 4L3 MOrtRIS AV s RENTdN WA 96J55 • 754060-0250-0 WHITLUCK RAF0a0 L-1-13dNNic:I 42S MORki5 AV 5 RLNTUN AA ';8055 764030-0255—j4 NEr<.LIN MITCmELL A 19999J 41') MUtIS AV S i. E.NTtliN AM 96335 FICRL-TTi 5ENE M le) . 1276 411 MJRAL5 L'AVE 5.‘"X\ E.LNILIN AA -7:505S , c M PRERTIE5 LLC .j01.57u C/3 InLUCK L icXTER AVE SIti 61:IATTLE AA ..4-LLOL, 4IU ST. 1c c/L; m6mr HL • 13.3 )63 EVAA5 AV1: • fC)4-1Dk.)-01.31J-LID • MAFFEU EN:JCH V 959999 40,) SHATTUCK AV S R,ENTuoi WA 95055 7.!')41.80—j14j—J3 LUNG LJAVIJ 213523 6 SHATTUCK AVE S • t- ENTDN WA 93055 • 764130—J145-06 3HLAiDAP4 PHILIP J 3320s1 231.'o s LUCILE SI SEATTLE WA cj3103 • 78413J-3155-05 TRAXEL 0E 5U17e-, 410 SHATTUCK AVE SO WA 93035 76413J—u215-03 FAKHAt4,ZADEH M HAD! 060756 PO 6LIX 78404 sEATTLE wA 96176 7.54130- 5 • CLAtiY KICK 6+sTEPHANIE A 059999 419 wHiTw6M-H AVE 3 F;ENTUN WA 98055 • . • • • . • • • • 73413U-0225-01 • SAREI riENNETT LIJUIS+URiUSSIG0)99 b1' S 18TH ST IEWUN • • 764130-0Z30-0-t• WIENKE MARK J+ 5HELLEEN MAAI93999 WHILNDATH AVE S• AENTON WA - 95U.51; 764130-0235-0 ; GCSCIEWSKI DDMINICK 5 409 wmITWOATH AVE S czfUN wA 93055 • 76.4130-0245- 7 JEACY HAAULD 407 wHITN0A-TH AVE 5 • AENTONHAA 98053 7641:.)0—J.-2-E35—D4 50NCKEAS LUUIS F 5K 380715 7 MLAAI5 AVE 5 . ;..EN-rUot NA 930J5 • - T ut•i, CHURCr 7777 ' LOC) Al-lir...Jar:1 AVE 6 4m '11,01-)5 MAAAGNT LLC '904151 ATTN ; 14aY P,LCHAr;;D 6 211 -'5W,tt-.15 S RETIDN AA 960-5 LUTt-ftlAN CHURCH Li67777 200 WHITwkTH AVE S 330315 t 764160-0060-0,4 ±E;,ATON LuVriER4N CHURCH o67777 200 wHiiiiWiTH AVE S i;.EWFON AA 9-5053 76-t.160-003.5-J9 .413R,LID A3.),JLIAION FO'r< ChiLD41'3999 PG DUX 63,3,45 SEATTLE A,4 361...)o • 764160-00 -90 LqUALL) A35JCIATIJN CHILD4098J0 PO bUA 6,5946 SEATTLE AA aENTUN AERIE 1722 FRATE-GiAL6399) 31,L) S rHIJU ST i'1NTON AA . i30j5 • • 164160-01.11-3—u3 AENTON AEH.IE 1722 FRATtANAL642024 310 3 THIRj 51 RENTON IAA 9305 764160—Ole.3—J1 T.RAN KIM HIEN 79,J6 44rH PL SEATTL-E 76-+180-0135-09 :11. 3T CH JF SC LENT 'o37777 22U WHITAOATH isENTUN wA - 0%1 9730D5 • L3CKHArkT CRiLLION +JU 5 sad 3T A:TINTON A4 734150—J155—j-4 + 5O .1. 799.9J SOMAST 3E b-:-.LLVUE AA Jt1J3b 4ANY P4-1 • • , 0 C� South 4th Street PLANT LEGEND Symbol. Plant Name/Remarks c U wa .— Existing Tree •a°i 0 n a--' 3 �r�_ u _ . •'a° 'm'a Proposed Street Tree aW Ai! yda; a'�j, t- ._� Ornamental Garden Tree • '��! ,,,� rkA�'y. ��Pj47.- Narrow Conifer Tree '' as A 19 PHASE I COMPLETION 12 , N a T '°�' �'e Screen Shrub (Pyramidalis) 'a FARMS FOR]5 MS 131at 'a ti c rge ®11 DEMWnON of ECSiMG StRUCNFE$ �'j Grf,amental Shrubs/ G o 'i:fta Groundcover Beds t, ° ;' 4l a \!+Ii. ri:I Lawn -1..� �-1 i , C • :: It '''''',:\"" ' p; Ple 440 S.F. 4 p t,ft 2443 S.F E'+ •.0 S. y fr Lig -�n x p !EIth 41 702 S.F. ../� i �q AY " '1 22,014 S.F G. �` ` "'W LANDS E'parEf 1/V•S.F. oeFe. L CAPE PRONDED.499.SF. 485 S F. 0'-..7..-.'.11D11-4 . .jy]pY • • 1 !!! r1 •oi.nn axaaF1 � .I Landscape e sWO, NO. T rI r FAS zoo 5e.811 za O. ��d�l!J;'}A:� Drawn n by nu.EOGS Landscape Development Plan — ISI'�€, f.l I �"°° °arttIUND SW Parking Lot (phase I) North zo ao 4o Key M a p Not To Scala L1.0 dax xo. :s sl_ <� • i •�--, ,,,,EC 1IG C.IC.0i � AI�REn IAm. , % -- B H&GN I• EXI G U - - - _ - e 19 PHASE-I COMPLETION - -�+'Ha8-r''r - •• HAND HOLE FOR USHERS CIRCUIT MD •ME '� RUN TO PANEL LI VW LIGHTING CONTACTOR PANa IN .+-1 CTRICAL RM WITH/6 CONDUCTCETS&/8 �/� r, a Cu IN 1•.CIRCUIT U•• ,DUCTO' &, ys O U #FO GND. I Z w q IN ADDITION,AS AN N a O +N 120 208V,3P 'ROViD'2 •� --1 ''MAIN BREAKER, 24 20A/1P 71•a' I:a•PANEL-1� XI .7 W Q )#300KCM•.• C.. 1/2•C. Q' UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE FEEDER SCHEDULE PROVOE UL LISTED COMPR .• REDU• CONDUCTOR i' MEN C kO SIZE 3PH. 4W. SIZE 3PH. 4W. I BREAKER LUGS. a� O 61,0 gi POWER:PSE(PUGET SOUND ENERGY) CONTACT:MARK ENEBRAD (253)395-6954 TELE.:US WEST CONTACT:- - 1600A (4)3-1/2•C.(4) #600 KCM CU THWN 200A (1)2-1/2•C (4 #3/0 CU THWN ii a •• S2 b PC CABLE:AT&T BROADBAND CONTACT:- (1 #6 CU THWN(EGC) ' �y BY BY 1200A (4)3•C. 4 #350 KCM CU THWN 175A (I)2•C. ((4 /2/0 CU THWN p 0 p®L7pBpN OF WOW( EC MIL CO TBMT9O! 1 83/0 CU THWN(EGC) (1 {6 CU THWN(EGC) OUTHEASf PARKING L. C O r.�0 POWER CKMFAXY 1000A (3)3•C. 41 e�CUNTHWN ) 150A (1)2•C. (1 /8 CUCLI TOWN(EGC) I� ` 0 LI P.' S ALL TRENCHING AND BACKFIWNG X PER UTILITY CO.SPECIFICATIONS f-1 PRIMARY CONDUIT EXISTING,NO CHANGE 800A (2)3•. 4 88600 KCM CU THWN 125A (1)2•C 4 QQ1 CU THWN .�•y� PRIMARY CABLES EXISTING,NO CHANGE BY E.C. 1 B1/0 CU THWN(EGC) (1 Q6 CU THWN(EGC) ' T TRANSFORMER CONCRETE PAD IXISTING TO REMAIN 700A (2)3•C 4 8500 KCM CU THWN 100A (1)1-1/4•C. ((4 3 CO THWN UTIUTY TRANSFORMER X 120/208V,3PH,4W 1 S1/0 CU THWN(EGC) (1 �8 CU THWN(EGC) PRIMARY CONNECTIONS AT TRANSFORMER X 600A (2)3•C. 4 #350 KCM Cu THWN y� (1)1_i/4•C ((4 #3 CU RAM . PSE POWflt POLE TO REMNN. �1 SECONDARY CONNECTIONS AT TRANSFORMER X VERIFY FOR STANDARD LUGS 1 #1 CU THWN(EGC) (1 18 CU THWN(EGC) DI'. •'FMOYE EXISTI E. GROUNDING AT TRANSFORMER PAD EXISTING,NO CHANGE BY E.C. SODA (2) 4 I{250 KCM CU TWIN (1)1-1/4'C. �8 CU THWN(EGC) O rB;DEAIIX�ISHE�D TO EMSfMC HOUSE N ■52 ` E. SECONDARY'CONDUIT X SEE RISER DIAGRAM 3•C' 1 #2 CU DAWN(EGC) BOA _ SECONDARY CABLES X SEE RISER DIAGRAM 4 4/o CU THWN 4 4 CU THWN -- I. 450A (2)3•C. // 70A ( CT ENCLOSURE AND CT LANDING LUGS % VERIFY 1 /2 CU THWN(EGC) (I)1-1/4•C. (1 #8 CU THWN(EGC) ) A CURRENT TRANSFORMERS FURNISHED X 4 #600 KCM CU THWN 4 #6 CU THWN CURRENT TRANSFORMERS INSTALLED X 400A (I)3-."-'-' 1 #3 CU TOWN(EGC) 60A (1)1•C. (1 ()10 CU THWN(EGC) METER BASE X PER UTIUTY CO.SPECIFICATIONS 1 _I. METER X VERIFY 350A (1)3•c. 1 55300CUKCM NU(THN)TI SOA (1)I.C. (1 R0CCU THWN(EGC) ' F.J. CT TO METER BASE WIRING X VERIFY 4 #350 KCM CU THWNISCONNECT EXISTING TELEPHONE TRENCHI E 300A (1)3•C. I #4 CU THWN(EGC) 40A (1)I.C.• (41 #8 CU THWN(EGO) " TO HOUSE TO BE ODIOUSHEO TRENCHING AND BACKFIWNG ON PUBUC PROPERTY X p /10 CU THWN - 1c TRENCHING MD BACKFIWNG ON PRIVATE PROPERTY % PER TELEPHONE CO.SPECIFICATIONS 250A (1)3•C. 1 /145CUKC�NU(EGO) 3 M (1)3/4•C. (1 B10 CU THWN(EGC) TELEPHONE SERVICE CONDUIT(S) X 4 Bn/4/0 CU THWN 4 #12 CU THWN !TELEPHONE SERVICE CABLES X 225A (1)2-1/2•C. 1 #4 CU THWN(EGG) METER(1)1-1/4•C. (1 #10 CU THWN(EGC) - U CABLE TELEVISOR N. TRENCHING AND BACKFIWNG ON PUBUC PROPERTY X FEEDER NOTES: TRENCHING AND BACKFIWNG ON PRIVATE PROPERTY X PER CABLE CO.SPECIFICATIONS 1. PANEL FEEDERS SHALL BE AS SCHEDULED ABOVE U.O.N.ON POWER RISER. TELEVISION SERWCE CONDUIT(S) X PER CABLE CO.SPECIFICATIONS 2. ALL FEEDER TERMINATION POINTS IN PANELS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE RATED AT 75 DEGREE C. ST 41 TELEVISION SERVICE CABLES X ®5(0 g D SOUTH PARKING SITE PLAN', CTRICAL iqll' ill'I' SCALE: 1•=20•-0• '''.% ``j J�Qeu1 �X I-aTI:PNL: N 1 2."' I LT1 PNL PNL PNL rIX, 100 225 7 II—PANEL I PBLI fie) ® ATENE,ISS EA OTDETI WE TreJ.u'. F.O019 lip RIGHT CORNER OF SHT EST PARKING LOT ON UPPER preoii b8' 'q 2ca, (80,0.d. 2W PNL PNL PNL PNL PNL PNL PNL PNL 100 ---I 100 (M, MEN IL1 1L2 OPT IP2 1M1 1M2 KI 51 I I I I '�—� I I I I I I DISTRIBUTION r11 _� i I - - PSE TRANSFORNER PANEL �PNLI EPANELG I f EXISTING SON IXI6TING — MOP ® 225 125 ® O O 300 C ; A. LA1J SDP1 LTJ DISTRIBUTION [ ®� 'v SECTIONjSE TON ) PANEL IIL /CUD_ (( PAR SOUTH AbOSSelII 1_ I I 9' L__„--_-J -J ABOVE Engineering !, �� I L ELEVATOR J I L J Iona 05 02 I IEOWIfA-BEIM REEL too FR:PROEM-BEM 1 1844 114111 AVE.NE IX PARISH MINISTRY ADDITION ADDITION SE PARKING ROIIOI,Wa 98004 POWER DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM (425)462-9441 [.012 FA NOT TO SCALE FAX: 462-9451 'L=M 4. \`, •\ YHY YSI V'YXS MNRNi1 [iiYiY [I ryt F 2 '!.--------ie; "v, ��'''`^-•i'„ ,,r-•714SaW s i i,• pp-. t 1 9 �\ al,(' 1\ tf5ET 4ji' g �..$` it --� \\\.i.-1 2 R° = riTt V ":1-2. -— -- r— L'— 1' s-- .` L\' ' \ F: \ -ism 1 \�1 C��• i —��1�4T�i �'��k 1_....3�t'T 14�\\\ � `� l:p.-,�"''ri: ''s[� \\ r- .+i aril,;.-.0.� `•i ,,,_ a s,\e•,„, ,\,,c,„ - i/ ``ti 4.ir • .c ii �yG�� I\ P Cy `\ 'i'i44 k' \ \\ 41' • ' p,\a .�M , ' Sk ` `,07, \ � \\ \ ,� \,\ \1\\ °\ \\:' 1 m s '•. .\\\ zii1 :irg \ p�ei M1 I\\ \\\�`.e:.l• =eE l \ • 1,,)8 Er 0 m m (n i; n D m _� oW 0 - ST. ANTHONY CATHOLIC �- _ c C1f1C 4180 LIND AVE.S.W. �' CHURCH, PHASES I AND II. RENTON,WA 98055 N _ o , (7EnPgr.n. eering PHONEO CONDfi10NAl-119E PERMITRENiON,WA \ (4 )251-8811 g op Q FOR Desgn,LLC ,x: Qj N 8 m t1 F p CORPORATION OF THE carriouc ARCHDIOCESE of eEArrLE (425)251-8880 Np ' w i N OFFICE OF PROPERTY AND nnas roUOTION WEB SITE: "' ' � y B�En;nE,wgaeloSTRE�a Civil Engineering,Surveying PACENG.COM —g ` S t `PHONE.(206)a82-2064 FAX(206)362-4286 and Planning Consultants ` J iiiika 7:s gv R�"r 8�. 8 I„ ii r 8:e1,I�4, - 3S5 x. _ \\ ,.—\\* �� S-N 4\�`\\\_W.N.-♦R7�\\\ \•.\\ ,Q O��\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\— SHATR,CK ...,C 5 \ \\,1:•• = \��k.\ c _.moo . �. I .. \Q' \alb \ r\ \....\��\\\\\\ �S \. cI ... ° N I il II-�. 24 ,tE °il __ \\`€a.. ♦� 2• I \ >g e �;�\\\\. rit r g 1 to 4,''' 4.4'," -?*' _ �C= \�\ I I \n, Z 5 t; EiVL— \ g i. i3 �\ . v 1 gr 8 \� \3 , ♦� �' � p 5 •\ , it r \: a Sze, \ v... �I\\. \\\\1, \ \\d \�\\'.5 lam\ ,\S\� ,\*41�\`� . �� - Amw+,lt' tit 0y� � � \\��\ul) to I ffiffil\ ♦ �a ♦.to , h v`` .,� \ 1 \ik la • Reiiiiill" \ k\ ,•' n .Tr \...�\�1 \` 7'.,,av nrm. .sq �ft...'3 1\\ v i Vila ��\ \\II.� �\I. 12'4}m `5 f \N•,- i \�i� �\` \ \v'. .A-:it ' 1 } ,_\ 5 ,'` t h;4 I E I t\ ♦ ....`�.\��3t\� v rls .♦av n....u.♦�i1 \'. N N.\\\ 4SfF � �R �. �25I ,4.,`©lrgozrA z.'\e \\�\\�\' \ .'c r \1a'"'\S - r u +,v.\ka \.', ` ti.\\\\\ti�♦S.. tA•;S\.Q\**- Ns, 2k,NA.`�\ 5\.n.\ Ya \�_..\\ \� ` a ik..Nv.a . a' ,`4y�tz, \vim\l ib,\ 1 , �\ t 1 _� `�\♦ ` �\ '^'\.�� C.\\��\:`,\ .Y sl. v `yam��.,�`S\\4\h . �''y �v 1p�,�`\ \� \mi.�,'\\\Q\�f<+.tx \ U\ � ! v`I� ,,'\°y.S'.,`.:v'``+a�ti\\\~<vr. �3. ♦'1�\�'\\�''':..\ I.Vq11111444404141 ,..5r„4, a\ '\ \ • 'p�1�11� � 1 91an � ;a 1. \ `\\.o ►�"' 1�.7.41� e l 'e�.euiarssl,�.r.s( i,' " ••-.'w ___ _i . ipi v., .k.;,ii[w.,, Jimrii ., -,: i t2, 11 1 A 0 5 gi �\L\ I5C Iice. G f i:uLi ?�v ?� S Z 'I I—\\ I \74 1 \E i. - c.r 6eEi �� .Ss7!!,`J� �1�4. i,i I I \ I_1 — , \0�`:e\n-rim—flt_ !\�\\ci �� /i firt't P1 Fl'�60244 + 0 iL J ` I df1 Ittk Ili wl, 'K WIrl::: W. .litl; 11Wle•V e•-0,1ig: 1 A \ Y.. III R!. Ilan.a IY • `L \�.� itt�r-.nr:a-.m17+zrxc+l.. \-+:.i+\v.v iLi.,_� a��F'q,�c7�`�InL�I��', Jy�ili'.�.. I1 I I -''�.\,\i\i a� ..\ \'�.,tl --4- Fft`lYl C7' -, °33 ill 1;�1 '1 \`s a�avv'�E iv`\u��. \lu my \\,I* ti.\.ti ist-•k..s'44.l\\N\U\\\\\\\\Q\ I \\ \ •fair -- ♦ F—.��o v'fi j��)\�\\�a „Sa� Ali \� 1 IEds� J . \,\\,\ IF I I Li I I k .. l'" I co' 1 , s -I 1 ma :-, - �,\\;-..t, 1 I I. 1 \ EI, v1 !. .� ��\tV\,\\``•\ \\�\\C��\ 1`\�\�\N��\ M( co ?VP 8 O rNE', oF i\ o A ST. ANTHONY CATHOLIC /�' _ 11 a ^ � Pacific REN LIN, AVE.S.W. CHURCH, PHASES I AND II. RENTON,WA 98055 n' � lji m o Engineering PHONE pO $ $ $ CONDITIONAL USE PEIaMrr aErfrON,WA \ Design, LLC Fes?zs,-ae„ - T al CORPORATION OF °ATHOL.ARCHDIOCESEof seAin.e Foil C425)257-8880 � .y q y OFFICE OF Pf,OPH,Tf AND CONSTRUCTION WEB SITE `•i-�> c. ' SEArne'WA ae,oi Civil Engineering,Surveying PACENC.COM L g "/ ` PHONE(MOO)COO-2OOS FAX.(20S)582-C2ON and Planning Consultants ♦ / SALVAIT.J\i PU i-L320( „DEATILE A.A :..V3J411 3 SEATTL,.. AA -3817o 7o41'60-j163-0 JJLORE3 A 1.65' :9J9 t.D E .''.3ET AV 3 AA - • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510 PUBLICATION DATE: June 24,2002 DATE OF DECISION: June 18, 2002 SIGNATURES: PA 3/1iffii e/�l/��2% DOE of20Oyregg Zirm LAdministratorAT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ee(7-P-I_D-O Jim Shepherd,r.dmini trator DAT Co m unity Se • es /t- 07" ee a r, e Chief DATE R ton Fire Department dnsmsignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: St. Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The proposal shall provide a pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 4th Street to the northern boundary of the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 2. The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. MITMEASURES CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT NAME: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alleyways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following' notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Center Downtown on the City's Zoning Map and Center Downtown (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 3. The final calculation of the applicable mitigation fees will be conducted with the review of the building permits for the project. With each phase, the applicant will be required to submit detailed information regarding the existing and proposed square footage amounts of floor area dedicated to specific uses. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access appears adequate. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Construction of a building would trigger a separate plan review under the building permit. Street improvements will be required. 2. Transportation Systems reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and made the following comments: We (Transport tion) concur with the relocation of vehicular site access from Morris Ave S (as previously proposed)Ito S 4th St (as currently proposed). The Parish's vehicular activity can be better accommodated on S 4th St than on Morris Ave S. "New curb and gutter with driveway approach" is St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 proposed at the new staff parking and loading dock access on S 4th St. New curb and gutter with driveway approach should also be provided at the new vehicular site access on S 4th St. Plan Review—Water 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 72 psi. 3. There is an existing 12"watermain located in Shattuck Ave S. 4. There is an existing 12"watermain located in S 3rd St. 5. There is an existing 6"watermain located in S 4th St. 6. There is an existing 4"watermain in Whitworth Ave S and in Morris Ave S. 7. The conceptual utility plan submitted by the applicant needs to be modified. In addition to what is currently shown on the conceptual utility plan, the project needs to extend the new 12" watermain to the north in Whitworth Ave S to the existing alley to connect to the existing 4" main in Whitworth Ave S. The project needs to extend the new 12"watermain in S 4th St to the east to connect to the existing 4" main in Morris Ave S. 8. The project also needs to install/extend a new 12" watermain from S 4th St in Morris Ave S to Houser Way S. The City will pay for this portion of the waterline (from S 4th St to Houser Way S). 9. Construction of a building will trigger a separate review. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall a the preliminary fire flow for this project is 5,000 gpm. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building pe1rmit submittal. Additional watermain improvements like fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. 10. Water System Development Charges of $0.154 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies.. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is aril existing 24"sanitary sewer main located in Shattuck Ave S. 2. There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main located in S 3rd St. 3. There is an existing 18"sanitary sewer main located in S 4th St. 4. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in the alley that runs east/west at Shattuck and then south down the alley to S 4th St and the east/west alley at Whitworth and south to S 4th St. 5. No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. 6. Any use in the buildings subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. 7. System Development Charges (SDC) are$0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service ADVISORYNOTES St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition LUA-02-054,ECF,CU-H Advisory Notes(continued) Page 3 of 3 may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. There are storm drainage facilities in Shattuck Ave S, in Whitworth Ave S and in S 4th St. 2. The storm drainage system shall be designed to be in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. 3. A storm drainage report and design were submitted with the application and are in order conceptually. Additional design information and calculations will be required at the time of detailed plan review. 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Building 1. Code review will be conducted at the time of building permit plan submittal. Parks 1. The proposed street trees located along 4th Avenue are required to match the existing trees. Coordination with the Parks Department is recommended. 2. Tree grates are required for all new street trees and are required to match existing grates. 3. Trees to be removed should be removed with a tree spade and relocated. In addition, any tree grate that is removed but not used at another location should be returned to the Parks Department. ADVISORYNOTES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE-,:_. MEETING :NOTICE.- J U NE .1:8 2002 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim hepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning : MeetingT..0 Date: esdM a 'J une 18 2002' 0 T A i Y..yy :,Location: :, Sixth:°Floor Conference`Room:#620, Agenda listed below. St.Anthony's Catholic Church Addition (Nishihira) LUA-02-054,ECF,CUL,H The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VACS-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. Location:215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4h Street. Parkview Homes (Fiala) LUA-02-061,ECF,PP The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Preliminary Plat approval for an 11 lot subdivision of a 1.77-acre site located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) zoning designation. The proposed lots are intended for the eventual development of detached single family homes— lots ranging in size from 4,516 square feet to 11,812 square feet. The existing residence is proposed to remain on new Lot 1 of which 20 feet of the home and an existing retaining wall will both be removed. Access is proposed via improvements to the east half of a new public street, Camas Av?nue NE that extends north from NE 24th Street and terminates in a cul-de-sac. Location: Northeast corner of NE 24 Street and Camas Avenue NE. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson, EDNSP Administrator A Pietsch,EDNSP Director J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner L.Rude,Fire Prevention ® J.Medzegian,Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney ® STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE June 18,2002 Project Name: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition Applicant: St. Anthony Parish File Number: LUA-02-054, ECF, CU-H Project Manage is Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St. Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes: the reconfiguration of the school facility; the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking; the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue, and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and, the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003), for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. Project Location: 215 Whitworth Avenue South &314 South 4th Street Exist. Bldg.Area gsf: 90,885 sf Proposed New Bldg.Area: 47,440 sf Site Area: 216,576 sf(4.97-acres) Total Building Area gsf: 138,325 sf RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M). _ /Y• � WZ ! ,- —Ja �te-.GrJ=61" .4.711oi PI I � . .ri !117,—, _.' '.l71 Ili': Y 1YCcs�? F! Iwo -. M. /� 4T. -+��asp- g-d tit! i 7 1 Ingo ,. S,.L'7 ,.01 i :1 `�] 1 'ii.-r•7,;. ' - BSI ■ MEI II= a, r . I '�\ ,��s'.• it r= rR!Rom"'' .� `�: �� F1C !fib! �Yf��/�iciprs7i him,� NI9.3�• 1 �s.c.."' 'i .min - •' 1` ail y` 'Za�l Al _ ..4. "'I �� %i� n 1��1111L� ?MISI�' �,` F1R7 1r a S a d•D ST `b Eial tZm 143 n a , �c1 W, r n r� Mew, ...." X ` i{..: ,I in 1a Ed Hai?! j A M is sRIP.i — a eo "'. \ 0. ' 5RD �� .iP..771 i-i P'4-.` LIsa.,tfY'1i — d undaV �� ']�� r7� . ��'�V?..a_.i. Ex!s!!nGProPer!Y. ,rvio x p, r5 . vgi ` `�" ikvi 'lJri"'— `°::',`Proposed R.O.W.Vaca!lon 93_ d I7N , :sr., i� •� LalY1M• V ETC .--, 1_, CL't L..1. KL-,-Q.I.: J _ 401rafrg FAN 4 �' `:n...t'L C �r'7171 \�` "pA ;Sri ..l..i1 ;IY Q .ui r 13E w; v �ai f�� • • 57H a bST ai� ,I1 , -Q ivra n i004, Lkiran;-T= �i,l . :AIoQ alta_2 I•rgr s:„ �y i P MIEN: 11 �':.r.. :rn�o i o�i y Pfi a� WIN Project Location Map: ��. . �, ,�Qom. ,,-,�a,�,,W. - >�r_e ERCRPT rt:12 a 111p11- DARE TO SOAR P� e11C6 e. Thr r fs Your attitude aln ys dete>>n:nes your altitude in life. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro gal Review Committee Staff Report ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 18,2002 Page 2 of 5 B. RECOMMENDATION Based onl analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: The initial phase of the proposed project includes the vacation of two portions of right-of-way: 1) Whitworth Avenue (north of South 4th Street for approximately 2/3rd block); and, 2) the north-south alley between Whitworth Avenue and Morris Avenue (north of South 4th Street for approximately 2/3`d block). If the vacation of Whitworth Avenue is approved as proposed, the applicant would dedicate an additional 4 feet of right-of-way along the south side of the east-vest alley between Shattuck Avenue and Whitworth Avenue to create a total alley width of 24 feet. The street vacations have been proposed under file no. VAC-00-003, which is pending consideration by the City Council. If the vacation is approved, the applicant intends to improve these roadways to accommodate campus traffic and enhance on-s'te and off-site traffic circulation designs and controls. The proposed site plan depicts a pedestrian connection from Morris Avenue to Shattuck Avenue through the campus. In addition to this east-west connection, the proposal should also include a north-south connection in order to provide a linkage from South 3rd Street to South 4th Street for pedestrians. The applicant will be required to revise the site plan accordingly prior to the issuance of building permits. The parish camps presently contains 112 parking stalls. With the proposed renovations and additions to the campus, a total ofl 225 parking stalls would be required for the site. As part of proposed phase I of the project, 155 parking stalls would be provided for the property. Under phase II, the existing social hall would be demolished and replaced with 75 parking stalls—resulting in a total of 230 parking spaces for the campus. Although the total amount of parking will be in excess of code requirements and requires approval of a parking modification, subsequent to phase I the proposal would not be in compliance with the parking regulations until phase II is complete. In order to ensure the project does not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding streets and neighborhood, the project will be required to provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. In the event the street vacation is denied or the site plan is conditioned to eliminate building and parking from locating within the right-of-way,further analysis of the project's compliance with the parking regulations will be necessary. In addition, the proposal would result in a net increase in floor area with the potential for an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system; therefore, staff recommends a Traffic Mitigation Fee be imposed on the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is biased on a rate of$75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Mitigation Measures: • The proposal shall provide a pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 4th Street to the northern boundary of the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. • The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. • The applicant(shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro ntal Review Committee Staff Report ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 18,2002 Page 3 of 5 Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations;Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. 2. Fire Protection Impacts: Fire Pre lention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide required improvements and fees. The proposal would add new construction to the City, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. D. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The proposal shall provide a pedestrian walkway through the campus from South 4th Street to the northern boundary of the property. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 2. The proposal shall provide the minimum amount of parking required by code for phase I with the completion of that phase. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits for phase I of the project. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new building area prior to the issuance of building permits. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 8, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro ital Review Committee Staff Report ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 18,2002 Page 4 of 5 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for envi ronmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Center Downtown on the City's Zoning Map and Center Downtown (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 3. The final calc nation of the applicable mitigation fees will be conducted with the review of the building permits for the project. With each phase, the applicant will be required to submit detailed information regarding the existing and proposed square footage amounts of floor area dedicated to specific uses. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access appears adequate. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Construction of a building would trigger a separate plan review under the building permit. Street improvements will be required. 2. Transportation Systems reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and made the following comments: We (Transportation) concur with the relocation of vehicular site access from Morris Ave S (as previously proposed) to S 4th St (as currently proposed). The Parish's vehicular activity can be better accommodated on S 4th St than on Morris Ave S. "New curb and gutter with driveway approach" is proposed at the new staff parking and loading dock access on S 4th St. New curb and gutter with driveway approach should also be provided at the new vehicular site access on S 4th St. Plan Review—Water 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 72 psi. 3. There is an a isting 12"watermain located in Shattuck Ave S. 4. There is an existing 12"watermain located in S 3rd St. 5. There is an existing 6"watermain located in S 4th St. 6. There is an existing 4"watermain in Whitworth Ave S and in Morris Ave S. 7. The conceptual utility plan submitted by the applicant needs to be modified. In addition to what is currently shown on the conceptual utility plan, the project needs to extend the new 12" watermain to the north in Whitworth Ave S to the existing alley to connect to the existing 4" main in Whitworth Ave S. The project needs to extend the new 12"watermain in S 4th St to the east to connect to the existing 4" main in Morris Ave S. 8. The project also needs to install/extend a new 12"watermain from S 4th St in Morris Ave S to Houser Way S. The City will pay for this portion of the waterline (from S 4th St to Houser Way S). 9. Construction of a building will trigger a separate review. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall a the preliminary fire flow for this project is 5,000 gpm. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit submittal. Additional waermain improvements like fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. 10. Water System Development Charges of $0.154 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies.. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 24"sanitary sewer main located in Shattuck Ave S. 2. There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main located in S 3rd St. 3. There is an existing 18"sanitary sewer main located in S 4th St. 4. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in the alley that runs east/west at Shattuck and then south down the alley to S 4th St and the east/west alley at Whitworth and south to S 4th St. ERCRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envira ital Review Committee Staff Report ST.ANTHONY'S CHURCH ADDITION - - LUA-02-054,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF JUNE 18,2002 Page 5 of 5 5. No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. 6. Any use in the buildings subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. 7. System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review-Storm Drainage 1. There are storm drainage facilities in Shattuck Ave S, in Whitworth Ave S and in S 4th St. 2. The storm drainage system shall be designed to be in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. 3. A storm drainage report and design were submitted with the application and are in order conceptually. Additional design information and calculations will be required at the time of detailed plan review. 4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are colleted at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review-General 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for!building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Building 1. Code review will be conducted at the time of building permit plan submittal. Parks 1. The proposed street trees located along 4th Avenue are required to match the existing trees. Coordination with the Parks Department is recommended. 2. Tree grates are required for all new street trees and are required to match existing grates. 3. Trees to be removed should be removed with a tree spade and relocated. In addition, any tree grate that is removed but dot used at another location should be returned to the Parks Department. ERCRPT • • . . ... . . • ii 0 IR 1 1 1 a d i g HRH iiF 115 tii 1114 . ililli Eh1J E -48 >-aa aui >O PJI Pq - >; j.g11yi i5C)y dE g • o a li 1.1iil II • 1atttek P veenie s - -ail a rn U D < 70 - 1BalJo6666 I j < (F-7 / 51m L , f___ . .:.::.:.:.,., ,......... .:, . . . . s 1—ofthitic ____1. /I 11 i a 1\ • / (47 ii u, I . \0 1\ 1 1\ V -Mauls o S - — . 1 \\ . ig rim 0 h T 1iia • h 9 <I I 1 • • i i{ t M,.«...a.< Conditional Use Application for ir 1 Phase I and Phase II Expansion of rma St. Anth-r Catholic Church k l s �" w Renton,WA I g » , ondPaw4uesvnerwamxaowvarAn«tbti3 48°A{SsrmoPein sevra.°1.1:.. E. f • I TO1�soumTOJmx o�rwcaTCr7O2 1Oruw�x ,,,`p;;•' S ••K,F••.•,• - DOSIINGALLEY20'R.O.W. .-,��•,`�' TOM GDAT•1213 E765IN('PO'iFABLE RA55RO°A5 4 1 .a 1 I..�1`�Q pr o 9 4... 'W'-e' • O U ;LAY AREA ... yp -j • • • PARI@1C'FOR 50 ylp( L • W 8 „,...a.., .,r,n,. dVT O $ r.»....... .K-al.aQ m�:.i:,,nE4T",1 Ie•4 ,ea 1 xa l ,ee 1 !, • ..,.. y '�`� r,. - - • ' i- } .. s°•pevF afowelell .. ...' .2 1 a to ' io a 100IMMEMINEMI toe 1l1 / `il'illT •0xJ • PIAYGROMDdPAN1�JG V anR•'S vouaemon PARKING FOR - PARKINCO10'('FOR 29 4) 8 FIRE IANE FOR I9CARS ANDVAN RRE LANE L[,m�o®e� 52CARS COMPACT CARS `��®�" - ,r� O • AO(89BlE5FAl15 • PHASE II',1-�PHASE I roeE�cnm .+nof ACC =� I ` w- a �» _ersi!F��itala_! ! •NIMMEM • �,._s i�lli■ -EEO- -Mill Cr)CO 2 . 8 g ' 1 k EGGING W.•,v'`"'a..,E. .°Rw° _t,_ PHASE I RRE IAFRi • rrnnv._ BUSINESS . ,.,...r....a. NEW GYMNASIUM Ca cfi *i,• .ifQf 6ACC II`V� rye C/ PHASE 7 I �' lit l \��• w.rxww,av•, " r II�'j pp 2 p III KM i m0.41MFID Al) , "- " p ..Le:;gym O il " a. s„ I E7�RN(i�KE SCHOOL ® ......._�..~_..�..... w. ..,»„ ..,. ■IrIi� QII �.� 1F� / �� ...... ..,. CO �< 3 ,NF➢R°fa. ur�= . PHASEI en�� 1/ , it s IIM o ss M.A.. a.r,. n.»». 9 „..."/ ..... �VCOIi[f . ,r]%� PNAYEI-^ .v.�.... p •r.i 1 : EMNG •� WRF\'B16 TO �:?!e NEW PARLSR OFFlC6. �� PHASE .o� •• j S` : '•" 3IS NEW 9001A1IIAIl N IL gJd--: E7m7PlG PARISH MINISTRY •'i,»1 is,:1H, :' 6 2 •• n EMSRNGK85CJ100Lr:iir, . ..403411,.., �CFNfER _ m» "'".. ». 'r»Roro.az �'.' .aa l' �.,� -HF110IIYGQtOGOV •,.1. .e o.ee•arx,' • - s�u'Al LA11.82 • A I •�. Miall'WW ate, v of • Ra,. a...AA .,am ..-- I L.'. �1�-r��. il _ , PARKIN 1N Ai1i Aili ri .w>,om� rr ��-. 'k� ;fir. .p iq Zr..4 1� ., . �:.� '�sioEWALx ••°' a::.. 7�.... a!1�. .. �II,,u.,..� �. .t.,e ..wRR gi i NEW SCHOOL U.mB¢R�c .... �if'• F1E9,:1F�• N14,"R�•' Sa a.. .a a , ."m.e u m..,ssaSoutf�4thStrce = ,�" ",a 60'R.O.W. _ • lth— M- 7, .,/, r`wak`va* » >� >. - a.a p�,- .�_ : 'L.a hi.' ' � 114 ».r „, Via.» .a.• ., �,....e,.. � ,. r r r `ir`i► i, £ ' 4r`rfrr �`� ( A3 site plan 'A' 0 Iv .m o ® s.+w • w �. $ g p I :ill :.. ' r Morris Ave South a fA \ _ w.v'r .....ue .n.• ...e.wno i' , E i'i grir.w., ii ,. i-C R� `�°.'" � , \ § •• •. 6.M.NOIIbGEP"lNip •• vnj gX a3 I g s • e. x " i;id - '12 s !i n \ \ 5 7. Q p\ \ 11/1 4_, !..' i; P iu x :.+. i p g • iii s t r P pp k MO i .\ _1 al ' 1: — 1) . eic\\.. iiA T. d • i.! wwpF 6 \ T& ifs _ av ...s 3 i! g0 \ gt- dill_ ii' una . it If ° -~ { } I IFIIR, 1,, ,,,, II:. --, „,,c, !oa° • P3 a k ` La f .. N ...OD :„.,,,„„iiiro a � $$se► 1 j17 PI ill Ig o ii 1.1 i i I, I . 1 lis ,7: �� as �' m P. •' :7,: �;, "�� WHrFWORTH AVESOU'TH 451 i 2I o li in 4 I fill ...„ Conditional Use Application for 1 s 1,0 r m a pa Phase I and Phase II Expansion of .a�..Hi. St. Anth Catholic Church M)400.'M Renton,WA� aw�nr"iaexvl 1 • • • PHASE I PHASE II ww Mr as 11 is 21 Armin $8 111 !!l1111 • 8 I 1 nit ■:111111. Rip ' 1 uIma' V N 111111111111;11I11IIII111I ' I . liii It\, MIIIIII v �� ta7 L, no J t �$ o .0i � I, 1I 1111!�111111111111111111111i�J� $ ; 9 m II ■�.rgo.oi u.rt.01.41 7.�.Go......:...I..�..........` • \I.11.m I.■r • MM.:: IYII::::::::::1 I I' mmoi... ,L , I I m 'II - iiii� iiii I p\i = ..iH I I i, g _ ..u�� l In i O_viiimii& 11111111 �I •."' I:111 11'0'): i •I 1 LA 1 '�'1.!IsI�.iYLI]ei 1I I I I M !!! 0 I 3 11 p i 9 • G... $ i f i f II I i I ,, �i 11 �IWI/ Z IIIIIIIy■■ ■ , BLEACHERS r M■ ■■i;'s\ i\ . i\ F\ I— � 11 _ , IE 1 b11110opm ii III I- �a.. Milli i • I ip 1 • 1 --- ildirii►i ,r J I.Ci i_._.; : S la i ...1 I..• 1■■. 1...1 i mom 0 ............ 1IJjIli1iiMi 2 II I O Ifl 1 m ■ • - • ❑ ❑ • J col. ¢1[f •br•. Conditional Use Application for I NM I 47 enton • ! rm a Phase I and Phase II Expansion of I wl St. Anthc; - 'Catholic Church uvwne.�•va� f • • PHASE II PHASE I »a rev Iaea • GYMNASIUM MECH 4.4 a, o v A L. wb a.2 --• BELOW oa O arx �Q . CHAPEL .. 08. �0 ' . LEARNING • } a d . RESOURCE CENTER - GYMNASIUM U } BELOW C = COMPUTER LAB Q ILI ?t• }- STORAGE y (FUTURE CORRIDOR) 010311/23313 . ./a ART .... ------.---...--: 1 1 ob,e2 '-- iii YOUTH _ nn:::.�1 F:c: : aPe� = MINISTRY t rn:.nm BgON - 'FLAT ROOF MUSIC ROOM -'R-. ... STAFF LOUNGE MEETING CHOIR PRACTICE T,:_ u:. iimi ■ I t i _ ■E■ HIGH a i) MU=STCOAGE I l` wiminsw ��I CEILING _ 4, OfncE — . i MEETING MEETING Z — — m BB ors OFF OFF WI - ".®' .1 Y a _ — LOFT HIGH CEIUNG AT W. Ma ❑O SOCIAL HALL r..y..• emo °' +w SP BoOF 'FIAT ROOF es x. wmMS — a BELOW a.,w.m. • a ¢ owe ara I 31 .r� am an 319 in nay au Imo' 'FLAT ROOF . Darr OW ma 9 m:v • aaa • Upper Floor Plan B �� Q A6 . . • . . . . • 113,0 13,47 • illE"' k • III) • • * 11,01 ' II 5 2 11711112211. 3141 MIS 1 1 i M , :,,..,.. ..„..!...,;. . • co 1 milli, II • < -6 M ''gaiC*1' .'• ff.' < agtoi,r,41 .1' 8 I 0 p • ii i,,i 11...vt.40,1151, , g 7 . 4/ +r !di tilt i so Jim % M: `,:.r.0.4.•I•15A g,',00-PI I ,:,-1 . 0 ,G. z kid4111111::I Ire , .. I,Ig 7 1 .,....:,, ,ON••, ..'• 1,,• • . . 5: /1 .-'"J firi VA['' Illi 1 II" ;% :,;::,:',......,gn.,,v,•.:,,, . ,.. . . •••• . 5 -^ rar.t4AN.0i., I ,,, 11 .,..,.,, t,•0-Too4 lk•A•'•• '.• • • - .: m 3 leae461-' I pt i. , MMIII SI 1 ii 11'411 • $ Cf3 i rilrATi't,V9!'1 • II •i4 y n 0 a rArAltaii,,,,1 1 11 1 1 i m- ' 03 5 gifiralir.Mir'I e g 9 ; . A I 41..: _..... ,v.i.11A qtaiW"V" • 4..,,:'''' •-•V.. -'W ' . .1.:‘.11110:1 / i 4. 04141411 I: 1FL 'I i - .._.., i=6*441.1 Ir.'1•4 • 1 iit III I . i : . ''‘.5 • - - =..e..Lliip r : ,... I., . „,.....,........... • ii!,1111111 . IIIIzria-- f; 1 1111111 .•••-tt,... , i iff0.11110 Ai. lir ',I.'', y _.22 ii ,, 1 1 i..:I:. - .(05,..4..."., • . 1 11:711`. .sh• ..•R a N• I ) i i • 1 - ,,.,.... , :.,:t. . _i. .. ., 1 j 71112:1,:i..1 ilii -13Ar7t: T01:!'!-. .. .. I n134.0"-III':IL: i 11 11111111b. I iiilidin.1411 I I,oi 1 1 1 41 r: „..d, ..:..t••:::ilinill 1 I 0 I .TYI 4.i r„.9.1,,.,2. 4 ; ,. 9111.111 INIIII m1, 1,,.,r; Rip, 4-15,-m 1-,.1,41., -,..,. -. . is lgilifl • !WA'"' ,': A 40011 11,•-7•IAL•!•••• • •• •••• • 'Arr., •p gik., 511i:,•.:11,: 413. • ._ &ado-- i i .' l•Ili i :71' it:' - 1 a .r. tali NMI 911111117'1..10 ftPli- 1 11 LOW 't 1 Pi •.0,0111: m • 11 Iiiiir nii,,01, 1 • ,;1,,. • ,4 • , , -r • . . •• .• ( -•al pill% lova ,a111 rn 1--111 I I :IM MI 113111 a t igioliti 0 .r., ,11'1111i 11 5.1 Orli 1 _< L 1 R *ow li MI 14,,111 1 1 In No! TI ; - __ .-. EE) I11. . i . j E ?..sm i ,Til'illi IIN 1'ElE1 If ' , ID !I'll ' '11111.:6101 I i Ul -1-7-1 El Ali •1.!..,,,,..th t, , -, ...1 El I \I 1 "I' J11141014' itiliNtkillAIIII•o ... 0 /11 I ditil6"N, !r'11,10! Ai. 1" / 111 i Aigo'.•:..,, a gi• i? -4.1. 01 • tr i 1 0 'riiIP e."':'•••' 4,,tilti . -•!••• / 1 LIM 4 II•0. V.; n i 1 lt54 •."‘ Q. -...- 311 P".*1;/1 1 1 ,, . .,....-...TA./0111 .: . I - :0.,!,,, dlri, 1 ,I..d 40111 I , , 11 • 40-1V:47 .1 \ • I - 11 11 ' ,'"1 l'Oi I I 1 _ i . 1 ,, ., 1 clA t„ „,,11 4,4.11&.:/i•r,-!, 11 p .„1 ,, 411 A ,,,,,, piiir-..'...---f04-"' .9- 1 . I --. .- il pli I *VP i:li il *91‘,111.:', .:3ZO!' ...I j 1 I a y 1 -,:. i Ii I I ;:iitt I::- 11 1 .....1,i,..mympo'... Ii4 4 ' 91 I , ,f, WIII'••••71f.y,...,,r.14,...4.,r,,. r • g 11 I i I rvIllwrr,n.,..:•,;;.,, a ;:. I. _I-,j, 1 , 4, •.11 li Iv ... .. .I .1,su. Ee 1 _ 11 1_ ),, 1 1. 1r ,,,..,.• .• - il ,Il.1 1 mit,11,,•,,,,,,„,,„:„,„ ci. I 1 . 1,,. 1 .. ' 1. ' .••,, . BEI \ , pili:1.4,,,,,,,,, ,; ,,,,,1„„„,,. ' • 1. '. , ..,...:Imo •,,:„,,,,AIN i,.•.,?.L.,..,..q rm -:, ,,..,!..!,,,., . 5i. li".-.. 11 ' 11'01 4 !i,, ___/ 14 i '',' t trtld...4.;1.::K,;K 4 I . d F6 i '' ki . 1 ti'llEil li ... -,•••,•,,•,,,,, -,.. ,, - '1 I ilf 1 I '41. 11 1 1 0, ws um if.:•.,*-t'.1:7i,..1 1 7 g , ,_, , ...• i 11.1 II)1 .i.:.• • .) ) ....,.. i? , 1.'( :::.-. 1 !mi .. I.t•-"...' 1 •,,,i . till A.14.411Ravir. Conditional Use Application for Phase I and Phase II Expansion of F'la St. Anthc- ' r Catholic Church . i i i %, ball.WA,4165 01).0310 IM1551.611 , _ Renton,WA . • OWNER TO ADJUST PROPERTY LINE 4'-0'TO THE SOUTH TO alley •,e ^"'� PLANT LEGEND WIDEN E%ISTING ALLEY TO 24•-1r TOTAL'WIDTH AIS- •. t 1.. ers e° $ymbol. Plant Name/Remarks et •.OW1 ci °•.«,.. a • Existing Tree N t t1 M. ? ; Proposed Street Tree w rI o U CHAINLINK FENCE ¢ ^�•> .1�i•.�L �'I� — EXISTING PORTABL S ETOT BE -�_� Ornamental Garden Tree lg o REMOVED A'TER COMPLETION OF e, L =��••` - 70 i o ,,e, /' EXISTING BUSINESS 'r.� - - - ..I o._c a PHASE PARKIN;FOR 22 r ADDITIONAL;ARS(RDCONFIGURE 8 PLAY AREA AND ;Ylr' 3 OS, �� Screen Shrub (Pyramidalis) W ++• SMOWN RE OW) 'RHINO FOR 51 .— CARS 7312 S.F. a' 0 Z �,„,�„• 1: k :_� Ornamental Shrubs/ q a� p en RAISED DECORATIVE Groundcover Beds Da (J E id' I PAVEMENT Lawn - �0.• +• aaw'� t....I v AIM .wa«� TO 1 1eRsoasD. _.• Inn e�i«�.. IP I - - - - C0 a \ 8 • % .�� * 106 S.F. TAT SF PLAYGROUND 4,PARKING . r , I PARKING FOR 9524 SF.PKG IlBB4 SF.FKG. PARKING FOR LANDSCAPE REQUIRED.aSS SF 29 compact LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 411 SF kl � • l � .•t« m„• �— FIRE LANE FOR 19 CARS AND VAN o_ FIRE LANE y.�'r � � CARS LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:1106 SF. ! ACCESSIBLE STALLS BENCH a a \ 52 CARS LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:1406 SF. ♦♦♦, ,3 1176 SF , p: 2 ACC N.r 11 a (�I� 7.Y.I'I.P.GrrarLal.I.'I.ulWllrfC•`•/I I 1106 S.F. l ,+ ' I!; r! TAM iIIIIIU�IIIIHIIIIp1g .. A "'Y '7.. I vile-',.r•'�wvyA o' v4�i0 b3�:ra is^•-H (.� Imo.. �. / EN Ian .u.. !i u W r Ian : I °:a2•<<:< PHASE II �' FLAGSTONE PAVING NEW I I— .. .. :H q�-- : g:On ME s SCHOOL IL— .. . Q FACILITY IL d 6 ACC e...;z:ti„r ;:'6R.::?::: I Jr `:I liWA I. b & & h., 4 E 12�� n�i., 25 S F. HI■■ pp ..i,i�� EXISTING LANDSCAPE ai�g tit i el d4 Lfialr TO REMAIN •0lEibpglfglll EXISTING SCHOOL 1 -, V111. 1��1•1r rArpr 11111�F _ .. - --. _ 8B ....m.. ..L_.I► tVC 1 7 iiimimew •tp�-I!L:_ 411 7....�.^ ... ♦ram I yy I II'�i� PHASE I ��L` ♦`�\ iae NEW SOCIAL HALL, = ■ •. + .jj :w. ••• &Me. GYMNASIUM AND — �,�� I cn i.0 I «Kr.eYA Y •SCULPTURE TYP. „•,,,,,PARISH OFFICE �.kA _ S': CONC.BOLLARD.41 o 3 A'o _ O FOUNT - ;as .•.�`��`♦4 6.0"OC. TYP CONC.SEAT . - �(/p EXISTING CHURCH WALL�� RBOR/ R I�r I sf. T(lllllllll fr.) • i "�1'.4GATE , Jaw 7 .7.�i1.1i _� CONC.BOLLTA D *-% Y 14-SCULPTURE OR 4� 'F`0� 6'0"0 C. TFOUNTAIN Id► .w�4/y�� ALL4� T� I. .n«�„...°e„„ ♦t'�iI ,.S' RAISED DECO•. TIVE ♦♦ ��' il' �� d `�� S■■'�„ PAVEMENT vai, • '!.11 0. 44 F:7� It....,, 1 1 .1t111.:: s �� :•U I �IC.I��A,�' r_ h �oescePeatayl Arch Not ' .d•EXISTING LA 4DSCAPE : ING ; t ,_ zo EXISTING LANDSCAPE BENCH iI__I TO REMAIN i' _^ -i r ` 16550��ri•RaIWa.No TO REMAIN TYP. I �• P 3 'r .: Y' •..® r `�•. a: yY�FF��: � .Y SIDEWALI � � � � J •°'^ • • OR- • � a„ma Cf3AIN IINK FFNCE Ifl 11 la1 1 , / 1■ •DEWAL mY•.a.a,. �'a.. , �� Doc zoa s,°I.ae \�� `^'•W/PLASTIC SLATS \ J /1`/J .. • a>t• Revert. NAT b EXISTING STREET b„ PROPOSED STREET TREE TO BE . Mj. WOWSTREE Landscape Development Plan — Main Campus (phase I and II) , O 2 L2.0 North ii • (40). CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6,2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J.Fesser$% SUBJECT: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition,LUA-02-054,CU,ECH Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the legal descriptions contained within the above referenced conditional use submittal and find the legal descriptions for the sixteen subject parcels to be satisfactgry,except that Parcel 9 does not,but should, include Lot 19 of Block 1, Smithers Fourth Additioril to the Town of Renton. This omission was made in the legal description for Parcel 9 as contained within the Pacific Northwest Title Company Limited Liability Certificate document (dated April 3,2002), and also in the legal description for Parcel 9 as noted on the preliminary survey document(Sheet 3 of 3). • \H:\FILE.SYS\LND-Land Subdivision&Surveying Records\LND-20-Short Plats\STANTHNY.doc lir DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON King County Wastewater Treatment Division JUN 1 3 2002 Department of Natural Resources King Street Center RECEIVED 201 South Jackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3855 June 10,2002 Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner Planning/.Building/Public Works Dept. City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: St. Anthony's Catholic Church Addition (LUA-02-054, CU-H,ECF) Dear Ms.Nishihira: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the May 22, 2002,Notice of Application and proposed Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the St.Anthony's Catholic Church proposal to renovate the parish campus, including the demolition of the existing social hall and construction of a new one. King County requires that a capacity charge be applied to any.project that constructs a new connection to the sewer system,any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. king County generally receives notice of new construction;however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing fixtures. In an attempt to remedy this problem,we are sending this reminder to you in response to the Notice of Application and Mitigated DNS. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district or city depai intent responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms: Please be sure that a Non-Residential Sewer Use Certification form for the above project is completed and sent to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. Tlie form should be sent to Eunice-Verstegen, Capacity Charge Program,KSC-NR- 0501, at the address above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program,please call Eunice at(206) 684-1740. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, (6()Ci6CLX-PA-, Barbara Questad . Environmental Planner . cc: Eunice Verstegen, Capacity Charge Program CLEAN WATER —A SOUND INVESTMENT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public 4vurrt$ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a✓ 1, COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 20, 2002 g` !n 5 -z. 0 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-067,ECF,SM,SP DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 6,2002 z 0 --I n APPLICANT: Barbee Mill Company PROJECT MANAGER: LESLEY NISHIHIRA x cm i en Frt mz PROJECT TITLE: Barbee Mill Dredging II WORK ORDER NO: 78996 m O CD ;Ti LOCATION: 4101 Lake Wash.Blvd.No. rrr, SITE AREA: 250,000 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and a Hearing Examiner Special Grade and Fill Permit in order to dredge up to 20,000 cubic yards of material from the bottom Lake Washington adjacent to the Barbee Mill Company property. The removal of bark and wood debris is intended to restore aquatic lands'and will have a positive benefit on fisheries and shall water habitat. The permit is requested for aperiod of 5-years in order to complete the independent cleanup action pursuant to review conducted by MICA,the Department of Ecology,and the Army Corp of Engineers. The proposal also requires approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water - Light/Glare - - - -Plants- - - - .- . . . -- Recreation-:.. - -• - - - _ Land/Shoreline Use - .._ . . Utilities - --- - - _z_ Animals - Transportation -_ _ - -• _ Environmental Health Public Services - - - - __, .. • Energy/ --a - - :.-_ ,_. _- --_ Jiistoric/Cufural- _ - ` -: - :_r- -. Natural Resources - Preservation - Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet \7, /,1 j/te a,0 c/w/Li04671z & -7- (41, 7. - • -.. . . . • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS / � UlteAL i n % �� 'v1� & Z Kam/ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS GW G(y&�� ✓ a a- CI /� .J' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional information is n ded to properlyi assess this proposal. /1/ \ /��i'�1�� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • i. { CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3,2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 it4 SUBJECT: ST ANTHONY APPLICATION LUA 02-054 CU 215 Whitworth Ave S&314 S 4th St I have completed my review on the above application located in Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5E and have the following comments. WATER: • This roject is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone • This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pres ure at the street level is about 72 psi. • There is an existing 12"watermain located in Shattuck Ave S. • There is an existing 12"watermain located in S 3rd St. • There is an existing 6" watermain located in S 4th St. • There is an existing 4" watermain in Whitworth Ave S and in Morris Ave S. • The conceptual utility plan submitted by the applicant needs to be modified. In addition to what is currently shown on the conceptual utility plan, the project needs to extend the new 12"watermain to the north in Whitworth Ave S to the existing alley to connect to the existing 4" main in Whitworth Ave S. The project needs to extend the new 12" watermain in S 4th St to the east to connect to the existing 4" main in Morris Ave S. • The project also needs to install/extend a new 12" watemain from S 4th St in Morris Ave S to Houser Way S. The City will pay for this portion of the waterline (from S 4th St to Houser Way S). • Construction of a building will trigger a separate review. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall a the preliminary fire flow for this project is 5,000 gpm. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit submittal. Additional watermain improvements like fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. St Anthony Church Addition - 314S 4th ST 06/11/02 • Water System Development Charges of $0.154 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part lof the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. SANITARY SEWER: • There is an existing 24" sanitary sewer main located in Shattuck Ave S. • There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in S 3rd St. • There is an existing 18" sanitary sewer main located in S 4th St. • There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located in the alley that runs eastwest at Shattuck and then south down the alley to S 4th St and the east/west alley at Whitworth and south to S 4th St. • No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. • Any fuse in the buildings subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how muciI redevelopment credit applies. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • Construction of a building would trigger a separate plan review under the building permit. Street improvements will be required. • Transportation Systems reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis and made the following comments: We (Transportation) concur with the relocation of vehicular site access from Morris Ave S (as previously proposed) to S 4th St (as currently proposed). The Parish's vehicular activity can be better accommodated on S 4th St than on Morris Ave S. "New curb and gutter with driveway approach" is proposed at the new staff' parking and loading dock access on S 4th St. New curb and gutter with driveway approach should also be provided at the new vehicular site access on S 4th St. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\USR\AI-IENNING\Projects\StAnthonyGF.doc\ajh St Anthony Church Addition 314 S 4th ST 06/11/02 STORM DRAINAGE: • There are storm drainage facilities in Shattuck Ave S, in Whitworth Ave S and in S 4th St. • The storm drainage system shall be designed to be in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. • A storm drainage report and design were submitted with the application and are in order conceptually. Additional design information and calculations will be required at the time of detailed plan review. • The urface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the flee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\USR\AHENN1NG\Projects\StAnthonyGF.doc\aj h City of R`.....n Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:SAv ei,/ 4)&5-(61,tIcjef COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,2002 fFVFJ fPMFNT SFRVICES APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78984 MAY 23 211112 LOCATION: 215 Whitworth Ave.So.and 314 South 4th Street �, a SITE AREA: 216,576 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 93,325 SF ECEN ED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed t 's application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al informations needed to p operly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Represe ative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of R~ i Department of Planning/Building/Public _:____s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q�1" f P1U.Q.✓1M COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: M Y 22,2002 APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT MANAGER: 4S y Ifishi it y f J `ii7 ' J PROJECT TITLE: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78 84T I i 1' LOCATION: 215 Whitworth Ave. So. and 314 South 4th Street i r i MAY Z 3 2007 t SITE AREA: 216,576 SIF I BUILDING AREA(gross : 93,325 SF 1�.� SUMMARY OF PROPOIiSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review an Hearing ERartt in rte-Qanditl` on Jse approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campu The project'includes:,the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with-pari the ng; demolition-of'thc rectory; its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location; and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action (VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • i Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health —— Public Services Energy/ / Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet _re (Laj B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Are C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS .see G► We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. j ' 141/ 7-Zha Signature of Director or Authorized Representafifi5 / Date Routing Rev.10/93 -- ��Y o CITY OF RENTON ; ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 41- MEMORANDUM DATE: May 28, 2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for St. Anthony Catholic Church Addition Environmental Impacts Comments: 1 . The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building addition. This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. Code-Related Comments: 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire department apparatus access appears adequate. CT:ct stant li City ofT.ea...,. Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Co 1S J},.LLCf f ,ll VO,COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,2002 nFvFl®PMFNT sFRVIC€S APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78984 MAty 2 R 2002 LOCATION: 215 Whitworth Ave.So.and 314 South 4th Street RECEIVED SITE AREA: 216,576 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 93,325 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees,as well asl approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C (I b C - Vi�G"i 1 :�V� -e_ G U ✓x c�aarG 3 ( ai s We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized RepresentaiGe ". . Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of R .n epartment of Planning/Building/Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & C, ,V LOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � v \(--5 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,2002 APPLICANT: St.Anthony Parish PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78984 LOCATION: 215 Whitworth Ave.So.and 314 South 4th Street SITE AREA: 216,576 SIF I BUILDING AREA(g_ross): 93,325 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project includes:the reconfiguration of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory, its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall in the former rectory location;and,the integration of the parish ministry center into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees,as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition,the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. A. ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities ' Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ka5 az7) ' AC__, - `�a-Z)o i /.s7// d aim., /e o/ ��7 /2?..A.,L ) . - arm zee &7 �74 '�� ae ULc/ , /0 0 4-tizz �a,r2c . /oc '/ -,_, tea "0 hiz___ AfAvajt.t.,6/ .51'14i,lb--- 4.-elai-- --‹d /z) /0449 4-,/ _jecy/----o-seci B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS caul e_ /Lb dZj e , C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • ,r14-Lai--- GIB k- /2t) ../ - Gl:-,,� 4 S7/ -i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe e additional informatio is needed to property assess this proposal. _ / 0/141 ,1 3 7, v/off Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 s . (jtlY o .ry, Measures:Proposed Mitigation Measures:c� + 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot $ of DO1.Bgtt building area. ' 2. The applicant wit be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rata of$75.00 per minim • average deity trip generated by the project NOTICE OF APPLICATION 3. The applicant vela be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geoteohnlcal Report AND PROPOSE DETERMINATION OF NON- submitted with the land use application. SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED(DNS-NI) Comments on the above application must be submitted In vetting to Lesley Nish hire,Senior Planner,Development - , Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on,tune 5.200, This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on July 19.2g02.at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services DATE: May 22,2002 Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing hue not been rescheduled II comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing end present your comments on the proposal before • LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF • the Hearing Examiner. If you have ques0oca about this proposal,or wish to be made a parry of record and receive I additional Information by mall,Warne contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will APPLICATION NAME: ST.ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION automatically become a party of record and will be notified ot soy decision on this project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The eppikant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner • • CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations end additions to the existing St Anthony's Parish Campus.The project Includes:the reconfiguration of the school faclitty,the demolition of the social hall and Its replacement with parking;the ' demolition of the rectory,Its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the conntnwtion of a new social hail in the farmer PLEASE INCLUDE THE PR:ill,:ECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION rectory location;and,the Integration of the par'eh mIntoby center Into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities ' would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees,ea well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork ' activity with all materials to be balanced on ste. In addition,the proposed site plan deplete the proposed vacation of I portions of Whitworth Avenue end adjacent alley ways.The requested street vacations aro proposed raider a separate QI ihli�:t zmla„`.d >�� - f i; Pt .-;i. action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision attthodry nee with the City Council. i,d • PROJECT LOCATION: 215 WhMvorth Avenue So.and 314 South 4e Street � k..1.41. h OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ONSM• As the Lead I I I), '�' L.C-\ - fn ( ). Agency,the City of ,D rh.n M;, Renton hoe determined that significant environ ental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore, �. 1. ea peonited under the RCW 43.210.110,therein/of Renton is using the Optional DNSM process to give notice that a i ^ j,.- !S:ON 7' DNS-M Is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single I i�rt Y•J RQ -t r< . comment period There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- �. i Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will totowthe issuance of the DNSM. ��.4 WP- - �+ — I • PERMITAPPUCATION DATE May2,2002 • I ) `-_.!•/nl� 1. _�, r�tlrr lX r^ 2,,..,.:. • �ilivt tv r rr. 17 1° SE E_e_ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 22,2002 I 1' ►tit :....ti l� 115.1 -- m... Lo^r% Ir I 4 Pemdts/Ravtew Raqueetert Environmental(SEPA)Review,Conditional Use Penn* • 'r +, - Other Permits which maybe required Building Permits,Construction Permits � K h 1 Requested Studies: 1 ` IcIC. r� eq Traffic Impact Analysis, Technical Information (Drainage) Report, I �,,,�� ,,``99 I^ ,� - Gecteohnleal Engineering Study t\,,,,�,, ,,....,..,. .,,,,,,,,..,,,,..r,:., .,,,. ,lit i1,��1 R =I • Location where applcauon may ` ��i�.. y I ,� I be reviewed Ramble/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, • C:.� , — tare, . • 105E oath Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 .I ��+i_yy� c i I+ PUBUC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for July 1e,2002 before the Renton Hearing Examiner • `X 1�'� ,II:I!„rt 6,�1,1 II Mrtl In Ration Coved Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the • I ' new Renton City Hell located at 1055 Grady Way South. I - ,Y`ki71 kiniga eigi CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located within the Center Downtown(CD)Comprehensive Plan 'j feeettetroodrlm e f - Q • Land Use Map designation.as well as the Center Downtown(CD)Zoning designation. The proposed renovations and expansion to the existing parish - campus requires a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Penn*when located In the CD zone.The analysis al the conditional use criteria WO establish tithe proposal • is contiistent with the land use deaphatients. • If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete • this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Environments]Documents flat _• Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. File NoJNrlme:LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF/ST.ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION Development Regulations NAME: Used For Project Mllgaton: The project wit be subject to the Citye SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Airport Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Unions Fire Code ADDRESS: and other applicable codes and regulation as appropriate. TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION I I NOTCEOPAPPUCATION • e MARILYN '..• a :M CHEFF ` ARC' PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON t CERTIFICATION i COM ISSIOUNE , 2003 IRES . --- _ _ _ ,. _ _ _ _ . 't J/el 1 , hereby certify that I, ��i.� t - copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on May L ZA)Z . I J Signed: ATTEST:Subscribed wii.•m .worn before me,a Notary Public,in and r the to of Washington residing ' % ,on the ..TCHts day o ? 0 99-2-- . MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:'6-29431 .:::>:::>:.;:>::::>::::>::>::::::::>•:>::>::::::>:::::> CITY.OF..RENTON::>::>::>:... . LISTF St 1 1 ING PROPER.:: :::::::: ::: :. PROJECT NAME: '* cr OVl C Al `\C. CUrcAri — T APPLICATION NO: 07--0 S`I I'C.0 The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • • • • • • O�� • SC te`® (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER �,l Applicant Certification I, riav\� �[l�� , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ Title Company Records A King County Assessors Records Signed Date / �OZ— (A licant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at .�LtV�p. w•+t-� on then day of AP , 206Z. Signed r r .. J Q�� (Notary Public) r:Cit'.:.o::.'e o :Use::::;:...:: .:::::::. .:.i.::::::::::: ::.::::::::::.:::. • iY:;::::Y: :::i:::ii::':•:4:ii:i:ii::Y.'il: .�:. a.:.:i : :::iii::i:::i:::::i':i::::ii:^:vii<•::: �; i.-:. .... : ::.:.ii'''::iii" ::: ::::i::::i::ji:::: eb ::certif :t at>notices°::of:a »::»:>:>:::»::::>: [ ':':: .::<.;��r<: . ,� �>. •, hr:.:.:y::.:::::::::::Y:.::h.::::.::.:::.:::....:.::..:.::.� 4{101AFIYONL......f.7A-Tel•-•-•:::—:.::.6('Al''''*'''' maid...::.o:::>::>: >::: «: • ::::::::::::::..CEmployee).::>:.:::.:: •• ••• .;;:.;;:;: ,, ----.::.: ;' :<�T IT ..�F. .- .. . :.: :>:.::..::::::.:. ,eacha�st�d:aro arfy,owneron.: ... Z. t3�• ,.::::::;:.::::::::::. ::.:::.::::::... ....:...:..: .,:::;:p�R�S, ....:..:.:::::,' '.::.::.::<:.::'.:;'.::.: ...... i. iiii .;.'::.�:".::'.::: :i:•:i::i::'':::�:::i::i::i::: �::.'..''i:'i:''�:i::i::'::iii::::".:::::i::::::::':.i:ii:i:i:::: '.:i:i:ii:: .. Y..�q. .. .: S.. ned::::::.: -� �_ �. ::�:.;;;:'':*.Date.:::;:>:..::::::,:>: ::..:::<. :.• ... .,. NOTAR :i >< » > : > <> ><:::>< • > :: >>:: ::>»< ><'> •• AT:'"`<;>: tl>>:;;or..;• efore: a<:`:Nota`>€ a tc:> n<and:`trt:: ..... .....:...:::::,:„............„0::::„.. te<;f: hn919::::>rei::i:........ ST"S bscrEed an .sw .n. .a... ..P. .. .f. ...)3e. tate.of..UVashln ton.residln . • { ,7 :G?rii:' : '''+:,; :::f ::%'i::.:. :..... :i•3>:3..::: :'?:::::":::::: > i ;i :2'<t iistprop.doc REV 03/ooMARILyN teAMCHEPF MV APPOINTMENT EX PIRES:6-29.03 2 • • • ..ram . • • • • L hh Hh A.4.4....4H.4AHAAA.4.LhH h.4.4.4A.4h.4A.•..4hh.Lh•4hh.4.4H.4d..4.4.4.L.4.•..LA.•..4.4.t..t.t h A..4 A.4.4.41..4.4.. A.L.i4 A.A.r..4.4A A.4... 1• Y Y1�YYM•rY Y•.• r•Y YY•t r. BATCH NUMBER: EH COMMENTS x CUSrOMER NAME CORP CATHOLIC ARC r -- r .--AA•l4.1 A.. .-- -S.A-& . --fYS'!. icr.p A A.4:�r�y*h c,v.:.� �. _ •��:.•R -�i?:.-i-!:aao'..x i a z,1** fr Y'1"+-r- rZ--y-. Y•i-'i•t1-- ----t iY'1•'i"S.23C T•1='1'�`}7'l{+ l`•I.Y'Y-- •t.•.-•-V.•a• ♦ r.. • ♦ �-�i Y'�`Y O_ Yh+•wT:J 4`O+•i'v•�`E4 JG`�Yv 000720-0003-06 000720-0003-08 COOKS BP MART 260680 COOKS BP MART 260680 • 150 SW SUNSET BLVD 150 SA SUNSET BLVD RENTON WA 98055 - RENTON AA 98055 000720-0054-04 000720-0054-04 SANDOY FRED B & ERNA M 501833 SANDOY FRED B & ERNA M 501653 220 SHATTUCK AVE 5 220 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 -- 000720-0060-06 000720-0060-06 , . FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR903540 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR9D3540 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR . 300 SW 7TH ST 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA •. 98055 000720-0115-01 000720-0115-01 , 1-- SENS GENE P+HUONG T 840796 SENS GENE P+HUONG T 840796 •t. . 7259 S SUNNYCREST RD 7259 S SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE WA • 98178 SEATTLE WA - 98178 --- `:a 000720-0116-00 `' - ' 000720-0116-00 .. C: SENS GENE P + HUONG T . 840796. SENS GENE P + HUONG T 840796 • 7259 5 SUNNYCREST RD 7259 S SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE wA I .. 98178 SEATTLE WA . ••-•- 98178 1 o 000720-0129-07 .. l'H 000720-0119-07 SAFEWAY INC STORE 1563 070227 ! :; SAFEWAY INC STORE 1563 070227 'y C/O COMPREHENSIVE PROP TAX ':1 C/O COMPREHENSIVE PROP TAX 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 ! 1371 OAKLAND BLVD-STE 200 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 WALNUT CREEK CA. 94596 r-- 000720-0132-00 ' 000720-0132-00 MCDONALD RONNIE A+ROBERTA K249999 . MCDONALD-RONNIE A+ROBERTA K249999 216 NW 5TH ST 216 NW 5TH ST • RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA - .- 98055 000720-0141-09 nnn72n-n-14.1-n9 - J.JJi_J—ViJL—'J� mCJUNALD RUNNIE A+RO5EKTA K249999 'CLUNALD :-cUNNic A+ROJERIA K249939 216 Nw 5TH ST 210 NA 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON AA 98035 000720-0141-09 000720-0141-09 CITY OF RENTON 110964 CITY OF RENTON 110964 1053 S GRADY WAY 1055 S GRADY wAY RENTON WA " 98055 RENTON AA 98035 000720-0142-00 000720-0142-08 ZERBATO ALDO L 651072 ZERBATO ALDO L o51072 205 S 3RD ST 205 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 000720-0157-00 000720-0157-00 SCI MANAGEMENT CORP 741609 SCI MANAGEMENT CORP 741609 8TH FL 42920 PROP TAX DEPT 8TH FL :2920 PROP TAX DEPT 1929 ALLEN PARKWAY 1929 ALLEN PARKWAY ' HOUSTON TX 77019 HOUSTON TX 77019 - j 000720-0172-01 000720-0172-01 LIGHTFOOT JOSEPH+MARYLYN C 959999 LIGHTFOOT JOSEPH+MARYLYN C 959999 . • 3300 ISLAND CREST WAY 3300 ISLAND CREST WAY MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 000720-0173-00 000720-0173-00 i MCDONALD RONNIE A+R03ERTA K249999 MCDONALD RONNIE A+ROBERTA K249999 • 216 NW 5TH ST 216 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 93055 • i • 000720-0134-07 000720-0184-07 . SCI MANAAGEMENT CORP 741609 SCI MANAAGEMENT CORP 741609 'r 8TH FL c:2920 PROP TAX DEPT 8TH FL . 2920 PROP TAX DEPT 1929 ALLEN PARKWAY 1929 ALLEN PARKWAY HOUSTON TX 77019 HOUSTON TX 77019 • • 000720-0188-03 000720-0188-03 CITY OF SEATTLE SPU 92,0754 CITY OF SEATTLE SPU 980754 REAL PROP — WTR REAL PROP — WTR i,--.• � 710 2ND AVE 10TH FLOOR 710 2ND AVE 10TH FLOOR lh-:: SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 182305-9118-08 182305-9118-08 ` KING COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST 1062274 KING COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST 1062274 C/O THOMAN ERIC C/O THOMAN ERIC 400 S 43RD ST 400 S- 43RD ST 4 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 '.: [,':-'.'.q ':ter'-:�a `. ::: ,... =-,,� ''�".,,- ° ° �. �-__ 783930-0155-09 783930-0155-09 ZANDT JOHN ALVIN 609999 ZANDT JOHN ALVIN 609999 5963 RAINIER AVE S 59o3 RAINIER AVE S _ _ SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA 98118 - .. • : 783930-0165-07 783930-0163-07 nr r A(GNEW TANYA REANEY 069999 a'�G':'� ''� ' ?; AGNEW TANYA REANEY 069999 - -n. ,_,_„ - •�_�;'_1 �'-r�a� >> 605 HOUSE WY S o05 HOUSE WY S - `'y " RENTON WA 98055 • RENTON A 98055 A '�. ^" '` 783930-0170-00 ,;`. 783 9 30-0 170-0 0 _ L FENG ZHI WEI+THUY BICH TRAN179999 FEND ZHI WEI+THUY BICH TRAN179999 24327 119TH AV SE 24327 119TH AV SE . y KENT AA 98031 KENT :WA 98031 1 - 783930-0175-05 783930-0175-05 KERNIE JOHN 109999 KERNIE JOHN 109999 432 SMITHERS AV 3 432 SMITHERS AV S --, RENTON WA 98055 RENTUN WA 98035 783930-0180-08 763930-0130-08 RUSSELL LOIS 6 839999 RUSSELL LOIS 3 839999 14845 SE 224TH 14845 SE 224TH KENT wA 98031 KENT WA 98031 783930-0185-03 783930-0165-03 . SMITH HERMAN JR 750976 SMITH HERMAN JR 750976 436 SMITHERS AVE SO 436 SMITHERS AVE SO . RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 783930-0190-06 783930-0190-06 CASTANEDA HOMERO 099999 CASTANEDA HOMERU 099999 400 SMITHERS AVE S 400 SMITHERS AVE S RENTUN WA • 98055 RENTON WA 98055 783930-0280-07 783930-0280-07 ' LODGE RENTON NO 8 I 0 0 F 389999 LODGE RENTUN NO 8 I 0 0 F 389999 1 324 SMITHERS AVE S 324 SMITHERS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA -•- 98055 783930-0285-02 783930-0285-02 •. , FRANKEL MICHAEL B 0D9999 FRANKEL MICHAEL B 0D9999 PO BOX 2275 PO BOX 2275 ,- TOLUCA LAKE CA 91610 TOLUCA LAKE CA •-• 91610 — _ � -- -_ :. � -' 783930-0290-05 783930-0290-05 • DICKSON RICHARD R 219999 DICKSON RICHARD R 219999 5732 NE 197TH 5732 NE 197TH KENMORE WA 98028 KENMORE WA 98028 ;_j T83930-0295-00 783930-0295-00 • •• BASQUETTE KAISHA ANN 869999 BASQUETTE KAISHA ANN 869999 340 SMITHERS AVE S 340 SMITHERS AVE S RENTON AA 98055 RENTON WA • 98055 , 783930-0300-03 783930-0300-03 GOLLIER TYRONE B 259999 GOLLIER TYRONE 3 259999 PO BOX 128 PO BOX 128 . RENTON WA 98057 - - RENTON WA • 98057 • 783980-0005-00 783980-0005-00 WONG KAI ET AL 142678 WONG KAI ET AL 142078 C/O KING LEE C/O KING LEE PO 3UX 80563 - P7 BOX 60563 SEATTLE WA 98103 SEATTLE :d.+ 98108 • 1 KANr'iN JurN R+PATRiCiA ,K ET959999 rt..NK:.; ,runty mrPATA:Ci.i n '_1-92.•'y-1J :'=1:;,,;-:k-._,1. 423 5 3i) 3T 425 S Srt) ST .,_ . l - =_ t ` - RENTON WA 96055 RENTON CIA 98055 .- •Yp r •Yi.ei••. '"- " ?'Y"'"�+' vi , 763980-0035-04 783980-0035-04 r;•� c:t=.�r a .4.;,-'•-'"ft.c.-t— RENTON CIVIC THEATRE 009999 RENTON CIVIC THEATRE 009999 `� - x= P O BOX 1556 P U 3UX 1556 Y '',- '=- " '% RENTON AA 98057 RENTON WA 98057 y - L. 783960-0050-04 783980-0030-04 GRIFFITH GREGORY M 650741 GRIFFITH GREGORY M 650741 •:..;.':r 310 MORRIS AVE S 310 MORRIS AVE S _; . i ::"^" RENTON WA 98055 RENTON AA 98055 -"' ' _";- • s 783980-0055-09 783960-0055-09 MCLAUGHLIN SHANNON 164001 MCLAUGHLIN SHANNON 164001 2719 NE 4TH CT 2719 NE 4TH CT RENTON WA 93056 RENTON WA 98056 = - e _-- azr-s t1,e4.1;;." _-`� -: ..,..ht-- ';;;:;tern , 7839d0-0060-02 783980-0060-02 _ '''-5.= "•.• 0 HOLLAND DANIEL J+ALMA C 179999 HOLLAND OANIEL J+ALMA C 179999 320 MORRIS AV 5 320 MORRIS AV 5 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 r a. tr i ': 783980-0065-07 783980-0005-07 4i,r. <. �;ti ', -• 4 . TAYLOR FRANCINE E 159999 TAYLOR FRANCINE E 159999 y.�F•,I;y•,. �rW, ,`J 322 MORRIS AV S 322 MORRIS AV S �� ,T , , •,. SEATTLE WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98055 tip lii i ir- +- B'` x;a ., •, 783980-0070-00 783980-0070-00 � , J,' • LITTON LOAN SERVICING 211143 LITTON LOAN SERVICING 211143 af' .0 c + ' �': 4828 LOOP CENTRAL DRIVE 4828 LOOP CENTRAL DRIVE 44 rl r �' ' 4 HOUSTON TX 77081 HOUSTON TX 770d1 :4 ;11W. w' ' ' � �'.' ' 783980-0075-05 783980-0075-05 -0 * • BRIGGS BEVERLY J 0D1697 BRIGGS BEVERLY J OD1697 g ' r �` i, r �; �� 330 MORRIS AVE 5 330 MORRIS AVE S t x;•t+•x<^ x4P a 4. ,�. '•''' RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 *J ."10II 4* .4 783980-0080-08 783980-0080-08 , i r4'A147'0 00 BEAN HARRIET E 8N2748 BEAN HARRIET E 8N2748 A 74.44. "',, s t} .r 334 MORRIS AVE S 334 MORRIS AVE S r i. r, * KY, 01 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA •--• 98055 , �� `' ' 783980-0085-03 783980-0085-03 T`m • HANSEN LINDA LORRAINE 4D9999 HANSEN LINDA LORRAINE 4D9999 ' ' I 340 MORRIS AVE S ;; 340 MORRIS AVE 5 :-1 RENTON WA 98055 ,, RENTON WA 98055 . - • '' `-'! �783980-0090-06 783980-0090-06 — — 41 • MASTERS P N 261505 MASTERS P N 261505 • • 344 MORRIS ST 344 MORRIS ST ' RENTON WA 98055 . RENTON WA 98055 • ` • 783980-0100-04 -� / 7839d0-0100-04 - NEWMAN ROBERT E+DIANE M 139999 NEWMAN R03ERT E+DIANE M 139999 _ 341 SMITHERS AVE S 341 SMITHERS AVE S t , ' ',: ,ys -'fc• , ,,„,-.?+'r!4' RENTON WA 98053 RENTON „IA 93055 41 HIGG NS r1REFNA 069999 HIGGi s rtrtCFNA J699993 -"` . 335 SMITHE,25 AVE S 33> >PtITnctS AVE S .b ;`:< � . RENTON WA 98055 RENTON AA 98055 i.71.:gf= 137-clft.4a IF • ' 783980-0115-07 783960-0115-07 • + rt� tHUi4LERT 3ARBARA ELLEN 371002 TNUMLERT BARBARA ELLEN 371002 `'▪'yy' T" 17576 12TH NE 17576 12TH NE - :" y `� ram, : 'c 1,!,:.'` 4�'"I '--';_ - SEATTLE WA 98155 SEATTLE ,'A 98155 ;mlv;•in.'•'-," ._ 783980-0120-00 783980-0120-00 BINA GEORGE J+i1ADINE E 559999 BINA GEORGE J+NADINE E 559999 ,"`"' 329 SMITHERS AVE SOUTH 329 SMITHERS AVE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA -• 98055 783980-0125-05 783980-0125-05 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 179999 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 179999 9462 RAINIER AV S 9462 RAINIER AV S ' SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA • - 98118 i 1 783960-0130-08 783980-0130-08 . JOHNSON RAY N E JULIE A ' 4D0611 JOHNSON RAY N E JULIE A 4E10611 18808 SE 170TH ST 18808 SE 170TH $T • • RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 783980-0135-03 783960-0135-03 LOE3C DAVID A 201192 LOEBE DAVID A 201192 PO BOX 996 PO BOX 996 • • RENTON wA 98057 • RENTON WA 98057 • 783980-0140-06 783980-0140-06 1 AWARENESS OF LIFE CHURCH 697777 AWARENESS OF LIFE CHURCH o97777 311 SMITHERS S 311 SMITHERS S RENTON WA 98055 • RENTON WA 98055 t, 783980-0145-01 783980-0145-01 REGIS FERN E 029999 REGIS FERN E 029999 15964 NE 15TH ST 15964 NE 15TH ST .',• ?-1A.1 `� gWg8-2'1 a BELLEVUE WA 98008 BELLEVUE WA 98008 c ✓ "- 783980-0190-05 763980-0190-05 _:.. .;c;,,;-t REGIS FERN E 029999 REGIS FERN E 029999 '° '� `''^,•z'� '"1 • 15964 NE 15TH ST 15964 NE 15TH ST • " BELLEVUE WA,- •��_s�-��_;. 98008 BELLEVUE WA - 9d008 s-¢ * 784030-0005-08 784030-0005-08 c. .,: :7,;:F'_+�7,, 4y=, NIEVA ANTONIO+RICARDA L 139999 NIEVA ANTONIO+RICARDA L 139999 7:�'� ��?•-•- �� •�� ,: 1 437 SMITHERS AVE .S 437 SMITHERS AVE S rMfb, ' '' :4ti ? ' } 10 RENTUN WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 ^, yipi r,- ;• Si5 '..g "Y.m -`"dFa.3- -i xfk 5 Ki 784030-0006-07 784030-0006-07 ,y. • .-1" :� .1 41 . PRASAD MAHENDRA+BIJMA W 339999 PRASAD MAHENDRA+BIJMA W 339999 �4 #x- ° '"y'4a `k` t! 3N 1 340 15TH AVE 340 15TH AVE . �°� 1- - ;, r, z�,- ;. • SEATTLE WA 98122 - SEATTLE WA 98122 :�'r r T _"' 784030-0015-06 784030-0015-06 .w ; L,b,�; ,;1 KILLIAN FLORENCE C0480 KILLIAN FLORENCE C0430 ..,.. 1 ' � =41 .0 509 ROUSER WAY S 509 HUUSER wAY S l`•L•?'^••'•Y,.:i, `t • RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 _ . , • A ,J,J-1,4 1EL,I,...J.,J;,', 2421 b4rm AVE .)t--. 24. .1 34,Fri AVE .. . 1 L. MEACcA ISLAND WA 98040 MERCER I5LAND WA • 93040 1 41 • •_ . .. .„ . _ _. ,,,,• .. .. , . 784030-0030-07 784050-0030-07 . • •- - .,,,, :.,•...., ..]_. -.-:'--:. .•I- .''• • 1 111 MEHTALA MICHAEL+REBECCA 745021 MEHTALA MICHAEL+REBECCA 745021 - • - • • -., ••• • 1653G SE 149TH 16532 SE 149TH i RENTON WA 96059 RENTON WA 96059 . . •", CV L. 784030-0035-02 764030-0055-02 ItO PAMPOUKAS EVANGELOS & 290943 PAMPOUKAS EVANGELOS & 290943 • PAMPOUKAS ANATASHIA PAMPOUKAS ANATASHIA . . 13402 39TH AVE S • 18402 39TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98185 SEATTLE wA • 98138 784030-0040-05 764030-0040-05 • All . . 1 WAMBACH JAMES R & MARLENE A391459 WAMBACH JAMES A a MARLENE A391459 501 HAUSWER WAY 5 RENTON WA 98055 , 501 HAUSWER WAY S RENTON WA 98055 - I . . •-•,. . . . , 784030-0045-00 784030-0045-00 (7,4 • A ,- GEBENINI EDO P+KOMAR 30NNIE479999 GEBENINI EDO P+KOMAR BONNIE479999 PO BOX 5071 PO BOX 5071 REDONDO WA 96054 REDONDO WA • 98054 ) ' -- • 764080-0005-07 784080-0005-07 i I' THARP JOHN J+JULIET R 359999 THARP JOHN J+JULIET R 559999 4 , 359 THOMAS AVE SOUTHWEST 359 THOMA3 AVE SOUTHWEST _ t • , RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 • : i ,.$; „..... 784060-0010-00 784080-0010-00 1 t_s • I SULLIVAN JAMES E 591160 SULLIVAN JAMES E 591160 ' •• .. PO 8UX 795 PO 30X 795 , .. 415 S 3RD ST , 415 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98057 . RENTON WA 96057 _ - • -' I , - 0 784080-0020-08 . 784080-0020-03 ... . 1 SOUTH THIRD ST ASSC 462513 • SOUTH THIRD ST ASSC 462513 _ • . . 413 S THIRD ST 413 S THIRD ST RENTON WA 98055 - - RENTON WA 98055 C gg ' - - --- s•-, -?::-.,•:,..,-.,:,7:-.:,-,y,-,--7,z:,s,;,,::,,,,,-,.,,,,: :: ,• ,,, 784080-0030-06 784080-0030-06 KLEIN THEODORE 843320 KLEIN THEODORE 843320 7418 MERIDIAN N 7418 MERIDIAN N ','-,':-,-'-.,.: ,.:::: l'..:,-, :..':',7-::',..1: 1:• e SEATTLE WA 98103 - • SEATTLE WA — - 98103 -,_':':',;:•;':-.L,'-'; .';::P°,!::,' -A,f:-'-.-- , ______ .--.,,:•-,-:-„-,,,..::::--;,- ;.-a, :,,,;?:-:v.,,;',!,,,.:.--:• 1 .:;,,,--•: ,,,s,-,-,.,41:-...4-1,1w:,-,4,-,%;--.. ' 784080-0035-01 784080-0035-01 C KLEIN THEODORE 843320 KLEIN THEODORE 643320 .,.i:';Z".--r,f;,4,-,:,.`","#-,i:!-4-','2f!,1,14,-:•;-.,!: 1 7418 MERIDIAN N 7418 MERIDIAN N 71-i§1- 11-4k:!WYY-. ' SEATTLE WA 98103 • SEATTLE WA - 98103 •'_;'744Qt`.;t7.: .H.F.',,I.:,,_''',?'4,':;f.'0 iq„-',' '--? *4y",W4gP;gW' . -- -- --- I 784080-0040-04 784080-0040-04 ,-4iigkortOvgiVII, 4D 4- !i*P%„Hl'-tt-NfelOriali:4,- I ZERBATO MARGHERITA f. ALDO L1N2773 ZERBATO MARGHERITA & ALDO L1N2773 205 5 3R0 ST 205 S 3RD ST RENTON WA 98055 - RENTON WA - 98055 .'•'; `7.7-*'5: 4, '-=';-.7-1`*r..«.. ft • ,:;_pf,rt,Atz,•**,,,,,,'„74%,,c.Ite.;,',-,. ,,, , e . ti.,,..*._.2 •1,QVP'.4..Ve''.e..t,...; t . - -- 0' •;'ill:,i," e.''. `V .P'' ' 4" 764080-0045-09 - 784080-0045-09 tf,';':,':W,4,4';': .1.•-',k -'7' ;f; — =; ZERBATO ALDO 1N2773 ZERBATO ALDO 1N2773 • :,,?'„,,,.':';-.1.- , ' -, .• - 205 5 3RD ST 205 5 3RD ST ,P ..,,4,,,`,',vir..•,(,,,`', %v'„.' , ; , • RENTON wA 98055 RENTON WA 96055 1 784080-0100-01 784080-0100-01 ® fr �` s SPENCER GREGORY, W 209999 SPENCER GREGORY W 209999 . , 327 MORRIS AVE IS 327 MORRIS AVE S C RENTON WA 98055 - RENTON WA -. 98055 "%. 784080-0105-06 784080-0105-06 f •: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC239999 CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC239999 " s 910 MARION ST 910 MARION ST 74. SEATTLE WA 98104 • SEATTLE WA 98104 k , .rr. ,rs+f. E r t, 1 - ♦ ';'4 say"�;,. r use -Yr.. '' wl•1 t 784080-0110-09 784060-0110-09 ® i s f K /• CORPORATION OF THE' CATHOLIC239999 CORPORATION OF THE CATH0LIC239999 F' ' a 910 MARIAN ST 910 MARION ST ''t!"' "� �� % SEATTLE WA 98104 - SEATTLE wA — 98104 — sus ; :, sc' ,#r' 784080-0115-04 784080-0115-04 �' ""'; -= ww '.„ BREWER CRAIG M FAMILY! LTD P839999 BREWER CRAIG M FAMILY LTD P839999 •_c;'•' '4 •V,'i�S : 1_^,` '?ti 315 MORRIS S 315 MORRIS S ': - a'. = Y' ,:. ., >,;,3 ,i;"-^,te =! ,,,,F- RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 • ',y f';`yw'-*',:; , 784080-0120-07 784080-0120-07 •• p i' A z,.. ='v 3` . BOZARTH R L 219999 BOZARTH R L 219999 il '; ::f._--=:__:, !'y_:="- BOX 1709 BOX 1709 0 SEATTLE WA ' 98111 SEATTLE WA 98111 _ b 784080-0125-02 784060-0125-02 ( t -, '.: T::``i'_'",i CHILTON PAUL A+SUELLEN 009999 CHILTON PAUL A+SUELLEN 009999 19703 1ST 5 19703 1ST S ~; t NORMANDY PARK WA 98148 NORMANDY PARK WA - 98148 i- 784080-0130-05 1 784080-0130-05 `?" t ' THOMPSON LILLIAN E THOMPSON LILLIAN E 405 MORRIS AVE S 405 MORRIS AVE 5 - t RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 o - 784080-0155-00 784080-0135-00 ; NORDSTROM CARL R L MARIAN H291262 NORDSTROM CARL R L MARIAN H291282 409 MORRIS AVE S 409 MORRIS AVE S , RENTON WA 98055 RENTJN WA 98055 .777- t:_ 784080-0165-03 -- 784060-0165-03 CAYCE KAMERON I 220669 CAYCE KAMERON 220669 29013 229TH AVE. SE 29013 229TH AVE SE • - . BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010 BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010 1. 784080-0170-06 784060-0170-06 =<"'-=. CAYCE KAMERON C+TERRI 2206b9 CAYCE KAMERON C+TERRI 220669 29013 229TH AVE SE 29013 229TH AVE SE - BLACK DIAMOND WIA 98010 BLACK DIAMOND wA 98010 784080-0175-01 764060-0175-01 GION EDWAriL J 364075 GION EDWARD J 364075 y;:.---4.:.: .:, ,. + —.-,,4 `" ' 408 5 WHITWORTH, AVE 408 S WrHITWORTH AVE v°' spa 'r-t RENTON WA I 98055 RENTON wA 98055 `°%w. v �• '`}w-_4 "' 764080-0210-06 764060-0210-06 -e ., '' "'a �✓' HALLGWAY CAROLYN M 1D9999 HALLUWAY CAROLYN M 1D9999 : ,- ;_,i:. -414 ,HITrJJr(TH Aid S 41-, wHIT.,-, TH .,V 5 I i i57i757KMSALKG Jut)). ANN i+�aLN J6 Y ANN 416 .VrtITWURTH AVE S 410 vHLT JOrtrrl AVE S ,``"-` _ 1 RENTON wA 98Ui5 RENTON wA v r- f' = , 98055 �a_,r;r�+.?�,; ;; ;;;. 784080-0220-06 784080-0220-OD ;r.; '''' =ri= :*'745:1: . 1 HIGGINS GERALD R+KELLY ANN 779999 HIGGINS GERALD R+KELLY ANN 779999 ``'' ,7--,-i.?-- -="'''�:,2, I 417 AHITwORTH AVE S 417 wHITWUr TH AVE 5 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98355 1 .. 784030-0225-01 784080-0225-01• - • - - WELSH GLENN A FAMILY TRUST 829999 WELSH GLENN A FAMILY TRUST 829999 _ • 424 WHITWORTH AVE S 424 •HLTWORTH AVE 5 t RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 .. .-- • 1 I 784080-0230-04 7340d0-OZ30-04 k -�I KENNON BRIAN P+HOLLOWAY-KEN179999 KENNON BRIAN P+HOLLOWAY-KEN179999 8422 5 122ND ST 8422 S 122ND ST 1 SEATTLE WA 98178 • SEATTLE WA 98173 i _ I 1 784080-0233-09 784080-0235-09 I TORKELSON EDWARD R 702501 TORKELSON EDWARD R 702501 I 11006 RAINIER AVE S 11006 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE wA 98178 • SEATTLE WA 98178 o • 734080-0245-07 784Ud0-0245-U7 a WHITLOCK RAFORD L+VONNIE B 189999 WHITLUCK RAFORD L+VONNIE B 189999 i 425 MORRIS AV S 425 MORRIS AV S RENTON WA 98U55 RENTON WA 98055 is - 9 i} --- - - - - 784080-0250-09 784080-0250-09 WHITLOCK RAFORD L+BONNIE B 189999 WHITLOCK RAFORD L+BONNIE B 189999 425 MORRIS AV S 425 MORRIS AV 5 _ `< ''...,:,,_ RENTON WA--_,h :-.'� q � 98055 - RENTON WA 98055 c ."irf7: - .. 1 784080-0255-04 784080-0255-04 ` KERLIN MITCHELL W 199999 KERLIN MITCHELL W 199999 4,' : =' aY ;:, ( 419 MORRIS AV S 419 MORRIS AV S ;, ^t '- `` 'ay—r'"y RENTON WA1.4 98055 • RENTON WA - 9d055 '' -> ^`' 784080-0260-07 784080-0260-07 " ''"'_ �' FIORETTI GENE M 1278 FIORETTI GENE M 1278 tr,y. `=" n- � AVE S 411 MORRIS AVE S '.:? T `� " 411 MORRIS AV r� �'° RENTON WA�� .4lt';' 98055 - RENTON WA 98055 .. ��r 784130-0005-07 784130-0005-07 �s a V kr ` r+i7, ': i R E M PROPERTIES LLC 9D15'70 R & M PROPERTIES LLC 901570 � A i, ' _ z ,,,": S�•. 1 C/O BLOCK ROBERT L C/O BLOCK ROBERT L s j�«'' t` 'i "' 2565 DEXTER AVE STE 402 2565 DEXTER AVE STE 402 '.�' `', , . . fj SEATTLE WA 98109 SEATTLE WA 98109 I 784130-0015-05 T84130-0015-05 AZZOLA ZAFIRA ESTATE 960169 AZZOLA ZAFIRA ESTATE 960169 " C/O BERETTA PROP MGMT C/O BERETTA PROP MGMT 39560 STEVENSON PL 39550 STEVENSON PL • FREMONT CA 94539 FREMONT CA 94539 i 784130-0020-08 784130-0020-08 ,- CONNOLE ALBERT 130583 CONNOLE AL3ERT 130583 `' • 232 EVANS AVE 232 EVANS AVE MISSOULE MT 59801 tir„v MISSOULE ;IT 59o01 .t;.r �' I • 784130-0130-05 7341.0-0130—U5 0 MAFFEO ENOCH V 959999 MAFFEU 'ENUCH V 359999 400 SHATTUCK AVE S 400 SHATTUCK AVE S - •-iil RENTON WA 98055 - RENTON WA 98055 __ - _ :�} a •a 784130-0140-03 784130-0140-03 LONG DAVID 210525 LONG DAVIJ L10525 - 403 SHATTUCK AVE 5 406 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA - 98055 • 784130-0145-08 784130-0145-08 a SHERIDAN PHILIP J 332031 SHERIDAN PHILIP J 332031 2016 S LUCILE ST 2010 S LUCILE ST SEATTLE WA 96108 SEATTLE WA 98108 • I 784130-0155-05 784130-0155-05 V TRAXEL D E 501276 TRAXEL 0 E 501276 ' 416 SHATTUCK AVE SU 416 SHATTUCK AVE SO n RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 93055 I 784130-0215-03 764130-0215-03 0 FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660756 FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660758 PO 30X 78404 PO 80X 78404 SEATTLE WA 98176 SEATTLE WA 96178 O • • 784130-0220-06 784130-0220-06 0 CLAREY RICK G+STEPHANIE A 659999 CLAREY RICK S+STEPHANIE A 659999 419 WHITWORTH AVE 5 419 WHITWORTH AVE 5 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 784130-0225-01 784130-0225-01 ' 3AREI BENNETT LOUIS+DRIU55I009999 BAREI BENNETT LOUIS+DRIUSSI009999 614 S 18TH ST 614 S 18TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTUN WA • 98055 .- i a i 784130-0230-04 764130-0230-04 iP� • WIENKE MARK J+SHELLEEN MARI939999 WIENKE MARK J+SHELLEEN MARI939999 _ , w;_ -.. 415 WHITWORTH AVE 5 415 WHITWORTH AVE S • `"=— '` RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 784130-0235-09 784130-0235-09 49 AP I GOSCIEWSKI DOMINICK S GOSCIEWSKI DOMINICK S 409 WHITWORTH AVE S 409 WHITWORTH AVE S - .-":'a-- ' _ I RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 : - `<,=:;:- I 764130-0245-07 764130-0245-07 w : . 9 DEACY HAROLD A DEACY HAROLD A " 3:w'':'a= ' 407 WHITWORTH AVE 5 407 WHITWORTH AVE S '' `'` RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 = ,` Q-s= ✓1r. : F"x?' "-. I 784130-0255-04 784150-0255-04 ;`e:rf .ay4 ;#. ,. i DONCKERS LOUIS F SR 380715 DONCKERS LJUIS F SR 380715 K: f20T MORRIS AVE= r' 447 MORRIS AVE S 447 5 i", :"Y'u �,,-,fir-: T iP a -`` = -. Y•rwrT : RENTUN WA 98055 RENTON WA 98U55 O41 7L. F r, : »fir 764180-0045-06 764130-0045-08 „ .^' ;5 7 A RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 687777 RENTUN LUTHERAN CHURCH 687777 '' ,_,`iw - -4 200 WHITWORTH AVE 5 200 WHITWORTH AVE 5 Ili r - - -75ti13U U13U 05 754130-U130-U� `r MAFFED ENOCH V I 959999 MAFFEO ENOCH V 959999 400 SHATTUCK AVE S 400 SHATTUCK AVE 5 RENTON WA 98055 • RENTON WA - 98055 lb 784130-0140-03 784130-0140-03 LONG DAVID 210525 LONG DAVID 210525 408 SHATTUCK AVE 5 408 SHATTUCK AVE S + RENTON WA I 98055 RENTON WA 98055 •• • . h`Y 4 784130-0145-08 784130-0145-08 — * ', 1.,. SHERIDAN PHILIP J 332031 • SHERIDAN PHILIP J 332031 • 2016 5 LUCILE ST 2016 5 LUCILE ST ,- I ' y / SEATTLE WA 98108 -- •• SEATTLE WA - - 98108 "- a.-`` 6 , — — • -- -- — ct� �'.-k' `{s� ._ - .- -�1:�• .ter i,^ 784130-0155-05 784130-0155-05) i-y;: ,�:,:. r� TRAXEL D E 501276 TRAXE • :V'yer* 2 L D E 5 01 Z7 6 :xs ,:ii :F. *,7 "':: 418 SHATTUCK AVE SO 418 SHATTUCK AVE SO _�;---�.�; . : r, RENTON WA 98055 • RENTON •- WA 98055 :::• '_ _ ti ... 784130-0215-03 1 784130-0215-03 }'ma' ` Y" 'i' - •.. FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660758 FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660758 ` '' PO BOX 73404 PO BOX 78404 - -a SEATTLE WA 98178 • - SEATTLE WA ... 98178 Ca t .. 784130-0220-06 784130-0220-06 '' CLAREY RICK G+STEPHANIE A 659999 CLAREY RICK G+STEPHANIE A 659999 t- 419 WHITWORTH A (E 5 419 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 • RENTON WA 98055 �: - . 784130-0225-01 784130-0225-01 BAREI BENNETT LOUIS+DRIUSSI009999 • BAREI BENNETT LOUIS+DRIUSSI009999 614 S 18TH ST 614 5 18TH ST RENTON wA I 98055 RENTUN WA 98055 ` -- 784130-0230-04 I 784130-0230-04 WIENKE MARK J+SHELLEEN MARI939999 WIENKE MARK J*SHELLEEN MARI939999 • 415 WHITWORTH AVE 5 415 WHITWORTH AVE S ' RENTON WA I 98055 RENTON WA - 98055 _ 784130-0235-09 I 784130-0235-09 GOSCIEWSKI DOMINICK S GOSCIEWSKI DOMINICK S 409 WHITWORTH AVE S 409 WHITWORTH AVE S v - - RENTON WA 98055 RENTON wA 98055 A - . 784130-0245-07 764130-0245-07 -_" DEACY HAROLD A 40 �' = :'~�_DEACY HAROLD A ..:�,:w»... . -=-. ;,: '- 407 WHITWORTH AVE 5 407 wHITWORTH AVE S 3{- >-.-t' +.:-.`K_ >i RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 '<'' 784130-0255-04 I 7841S0-0255-04 0 s ^'1 * 4� 4% DONCKERS LOUIS F SR 380715 DDNCKERS LOUIS F SR 380715 � ,� ' x+ `9 r 447 MORRIS AVE 5 447 MORRIS AVE 5 r rSi�t -�� t:5 RENTON WA 1 98055 RENTON WA 98053 • �`• C.A,A L:Lir,i. ` '-h ' :'� A� u r �F 784180-0045-06 764180-0045-08 • n r. t11x.r e-lic A� -,.-4t RENTON LUTrERAN,CHURCH o87777 RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 087777 `• . >� t tr 20U WHITwORTH AVE 5 200 wrITWORTh AVE 5 fp f_., tiv" y •„:;fl" Ji, ..- `i-.05� r.Ct:TJ1. a: .,i60:_ V I _ 784160-01S5-09 7o4130-U1»-09 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT 687777 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT 687777 220 WHITWORTH AIVE S 220 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON wA - 98055 784180-0140-02 784160-0140-02 LOCKHART CRILLIION 089999 LOCKHART CRILLION 089999 400 S 3RD ST 400 S 3RD ST • RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 784180-0155-04 784180-0155-04 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES 179999 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES 179999 4650 SOMERSET AV SE 4650 SOMERSET AV SE • BELLEVUE WA 98006 BELLEVUE WA 98006 • 784180-0165-02 784180-0165-02 SALVATION ARMY 542286 SALVATION ARMY 542286 PO BOX 9219 PO BOX 9219 SEATTLE WA 98109 SEATTLE WA • •-- 98109 • r 784180-0180-03 784180-0180-03 SALVATION ARMY THE 461279 SALVATION ARMY THE 461279 NORTHWEST DIVISION NORTHWEST DIVISION PO BOX 9219 PO BOX 9219 SEATTLE WA 98109 SEATTLE WA 98109 784180-0183-00 784180-01d3-00 • FERNYHOUGH STANLEY 050411 FERNYH000H STANLEY 050411 10008 RAINIER AVE S 10008 RAINIER AVE 5 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98176 784180-0185-06 784180-0185-08 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 189999 SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 189999 4650 SOMERSET AV SE 4650 SOMERSET AV SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 BELLEVUE WA - 98006 • • • + IMMR4 + .. . CYDSC1 AT-f r 0 . . .. • NOTICE OF APPLICATION . AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- . SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) • DATE: May 22,2002 . . LAND USE NUMBER: • LUA-02-054,CU-H,•ECF • APPLICATION NAME: ST.ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for proposed renovations and additions to the existing St.Anthony's Parish Campus. The project . Includes:the reconfiguration'of the school facility;the demolition of the social hall and its replacement with parking;the demolition of the rectory,its relocation to 215 Whitworth Avenue,and the construction of a new social hall In the former rectory location;and,the Integration of the parish ministry center Into the new parish campus. Site preparation activities would require the removal of a limited number of existing trees, as well as approximately 500 cubic yards of earthwork .. activity with all materials to be balanced on site. In addition, the proposed site plan depicts the proposed vacation of portions of Whitworth Avenue and adjacent alley ways. The requested street vacations are proposed under a separate action(VAC-00-003),for which the decision authority lies with the City Council. PROJECT LOCATION: 1 215 Whitworth Avenue So.and 314 South 4th Street ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 4321 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a . DNS-M Is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single • comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Signiificance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: May 2,2002 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 22,2002 • Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Conditional Use Permit • Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Analysis, Technical Information (Drainage) Report, Geotechnical Engineering Study • . Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, • • 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 . PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for July 16,2002 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the • new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: - Land Use: The subject site is located within the Center Downtown(CD)Comprehensive Plan • Land Use Map designation, as well as the Center Downtown (CD) Zoning designation. The proposed renovations and expansion to the existing parish campus requires a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when located in the • CD zone. The analysis of the conditional use criteria will establish if the proposal is consistent with the land use designations. • Environmental Documents'that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. • Development Regulations; • Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Airport Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code • and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. NOTICE OF APPLICATION • Proposed Mitigation Measures: . 1. . The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot • of net new,building area. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 per net new average daily trip generated by the project. •' 3. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report . . submitted with the land use application. . •Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, Development ' Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on June 5, 2002. This matter Is also scheduled for a public hearing on July 16.2002,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in .. ' writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive • . additional Information by mall, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' le ,r r 1 __ .air q rr ,ir1 k Irli �r I 3;e �• v 1 C, 1i1' jO in , c,i filir= . 1 IYrx Y ri\ ' rro%c Zf 1 i j ICI i7" -' JIL M i:1pY Milli s= 'f r\ rrl. n 1E :_III-1 iF11Z ZZ A �j • CR S ,I 1]nl r. ,7, {/f I 1, +� 9[ pp,��ip tlia spry 1_:• 011 •`J`J..�� n�}�'nt • 0 Jr • S 1..]Ir� 1 1117 `1 fil Y • '.r±elpI • • \. .\ ��i 1gtE ��orH Air; �e�� i'i' x r.i k�1rr 11 1 '� .. t t uln { I• •, '•'J >!vM --wtov.u.a.mr. '7. t 1 1 r f..IZ ¶7.1 y. I c t L. -: yti- �6Yi\It.pnl, �f' :;',' r� �,:_--':: 1::'''-'I ui i i .i.+fUI.�_' 1"'Ir10.t.d\,0.1M,\61lrn.; ro4: x IIF:i , i ir L:J o f 7,,,-:41; c ± Iff1 14 � ti � r .ffLJIW. 1 e 'G''r ."•; -Cr _lltl i;l+Ill lJO!:1 • '� �: �� ,yyle��: .d 31�. L 1:a7P' 171 P[ +1€ ' lig1' •111 t1 „1": i rS r r!';!: cIj Lf_ Ll 'r,M,911 ■■{{ �w t T�. l'1 V lb Oi 4 D 771 TTT • Weghbalaod Plan .t. ... 0 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete - this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File NoJName: LUA-02-054,CU-H,ECF 1ST.ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION , NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: • • NOTICE OF APPUCATION •o • CITY RENTON a Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 22,2002 • Mr. Mark Stine Rutledge Maul Architects 19336—47t Avenue NE Seattle,WA 98155 SUBJECT: St.Anthony Catholic Church Addition Project No. LUA-02-054, CU-H, ECF Dear Mr. Stine: The pevelopment Planning Section of the City of Renton has,determined that the subject application is complete according g to submittal requirements.and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental'Review Committee on • June 18, 2002.'. Prior to that••review, you.will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. ' • A Public Hearing will be held by the.Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, on July 16, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or.representative(s).of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the.Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be • heard as part of this public hearing: Please contact me,at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. . Sincerely, //). Lesley Nishihira . • Senior Planner cc: Corp. of Catholic Archbishop of Seattle/Owners ' St.Anthony Parish/Applicant . Nancy Rogers/Party of Record • acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE ,; This paper contains50%recycledmaterial,30%postconsumer it , ' CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION , PROPERTY OWNER(S) I I PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: a k`a Archdiocese of Seattle PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Corp. of the Catholic Archbishop of E eattleSt. Anthony Catholic Church -Addition ADDRESS: 910 Mari�n Street PROJECT/ADDRESS(SuLOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 1 314 South 4th Street CITY: Seattle ZIP:98104 Renton, Washington - 98055 • TELEPHONE NUMBER:! (206) 382-4 851 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): See attached list Il - APPLICANT Of other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: St. Anthony Parish Church and K-8 parochial school Gre.5 Wilki V)E C.rly p NN PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY(if applicable): EM'ON n►G Church and K-8 parochial school MAY Q..a 02 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 314 South 4th Street ® CD �'7��'�I�-If PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Renton I ZIP: 98055 (if applicable): Not Applicable TELEPHONE NUMBER (425)255-3132 EXISTING ZONING: CD PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): Not Applicable CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feet): 216,576 s.f. (See Note 1) NAME: Mark Stine SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): N/A COMPANY(if applicable,: Rutledge Maul Architects ADDRESS: 19336 47ih Avenue N.E. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE(if applicable):N/A j NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable):N/A CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98155 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (206)440-0330 - mark@rutledgemaul.com Note 1: Site Area includes the area of Whitworth Avenue proposed for vacation. masterap.doc Revised January 2002 f t . PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(If applicable): PROJECT VALUE:$6,000,000 One SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable):2,440 sf- incl. new garage ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA,PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL . BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):2,915 sf ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicat+):45,000 sf ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OJF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): 42,970 sf ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. applicable):87,970 sf NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT(if applicable): 60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE South East QUARTER OF SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES I Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. i _ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ SOD-01) —EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ �0,� SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ _VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ —REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION _ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) _FINAL PLAT(FP) $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL I(SA-A,SA-H) $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ _SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) j $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ _SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ _VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: _ ) $ Postage: $ 3t 7$ _WAIVER(W) S TOTAL FEE S c�.53Q-"1 3' r-, OTHER: i $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name) Patrick J. S it r se 1 y,A t t o r n e y-i ncicr.that I am(please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or XX the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)aQq that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my ko. e• d viief. I certifythat I know o5 have satisfactory evidence that = G „M,%%‘„, T t , v4-«t.e�- signed this instrun�n d. :��,t.,,, •f•*U,Qd1O r/ �� it to be hi rltheir free and voluntary act for the uses r �.N.t j` '�'+� 2 // mentioned in the trument�j rr, ) , o ToZ% % (Signature of epresentative) L �e �� `;� ��,�"�,..„ ; IA , 6+_11 0Noubl c in a for the State of Washington ' 0',,`2j 1Ii A ill'%%1%.vs. �i� (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary(Print) .f/A#y Al.GLUT-499:5c-X� 11►I I SHIN®� My appointment expires: /4 a 7—G,f2. ``".„ masterap.doc Revised January 2002 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, ALEXANDER JOSEPH BRUNETT, the duly appointed and acting Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Seattle and the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington, have made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and.appoint, GEORGE L. THOMAS, ALBERTA HORN, and PATRICK J. SURSELY, each independently and not jointly, as my true and lawful attorneys to ask, demand, sue for, recover, collect and receive all such sums of money, debts, dues, accounts, legacies, bequests, interests, dividends, annuities and demands whatsoever, as are now or shall hereafter become due, owing, payable or belonging to me, Gand have, se and take all lawful ways and means in my name, or otherwise, for the recovery O thereof, by:attachments, arrest, distress or otherwise, and to compromise and agree for the same, 1n and to mak , sign, seal and deliver acquittances, or other sufficient discharges for the same; for me O and in my (name; to bargain, contract, agree for, purchase, receive and take lands, tenements, hereditamerits, and accept the seizing and possession of all lands, and all deeds, and other assurances in the law therefor; and to lease, let, demise, bargain, sell, remise, release,. convey, mortgage acid hypothecate lands, tenements and hereditament, upon such terms and conditions and under such covenants as she shall think fit; to assign and transfer any note or mortgage; ALSO to bargain-and agree for, buy, sell, mortgage, hypothecate, and in any and every way and manner deal in and with goods, wares and merchandise, choses in action and other property, in possession or in General Power of Attorney- 1 , 1 action, and to release mortgages on lands or chattels, and to make, do and transact all and every kind of business of whatsoever kind and nature. AND also for me, and in my name, and as my act and deed, to sign, seal, execute, deliver and acknowledge such deeds, 'leases and assignments of leases, covenants, indentures, agreements, mortgages, hypothecations, bottomries, charter parties, bills of lading, bills, bonds, notes, receipts, evidences of debt, releases and satisfactions of mortgage,judgment and other debts, and such other instruments in writing, of whatsoever kind or nature, as may be necessary or proper in the premises: This power of attorney shall not be affected by my disability. So long as neither the attorney-in-fact nor any person with whom the attorney-in-fact was dealing at the time of any act taken pursuant to this Power of Attorneyhas received actual knowledge or written notice of P g revocation or termination of this Power of Attorney by death or otherwise, the attorney-in-fact and such persons dealing with the attorney-in-fact shall be entitled to rely upon this Power of Attorney. CThe Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington shall hold harmless andindemnify indify,the attorney-in-fact from any and all 1/ O liability for acts done in good faith. GO This power of Attorney shall be terminated by or death or the installation of a successor Archbishop for the Archdiocese of Seattle. GIVING AND GRANTING unto my said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done as I might or could do if personally present. I hereby ratify and confirm all acts that they severally shall do or cause to be done, by virtue of these presents. General Power of Attorney-2 , - • } RETURN ADDRES ARCHDIIOCESE OF SEATTLE c/o ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE N y i0 910 MARION STREET }- SEATTLE , WA 98104-1299 9 s c- c 3 Plasm print,natty or typo information DOCUMENT TITLE GE RAL POWER OF ATTORNEY _ —... _ I REFERENCE NUMBERS (S) OF RELATED,DOCUMENTS Additional Pielennoe ire on pap _ • GRANTOR (S)(List Forst Gni Masi.trod) N BRUNETIT, ALEXANDER J . O 1 CI i O I . p 1 • Mtheentd VL1tor .n MN O CIO GRANTEE (S)pat Writ and Weida THOM S . GEORGE L. _, ` HORN, ALBERTA _. . SURSELY , PATRICK J . - . Additional wnntae on pap,.,_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION cAbbrirriat.a Ibr t La iet.biackp4e or arAwart - - AdsU«+r 40 on PP.r.-. ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY.TAX PARCEL/ACCOUNT NUMBER a Additignal WOW ra en The AuditoNRteordM w/rdy an th YOonniden"WOW m Mt link The Mal will net rood Vs Asap**d lift fa aoesrreoy«;opnOYnnap of to Inclining IrOremetion priviond heroin. ; , r I - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this M "day of December, 1997. TER ALE ER Ji EP BRUNETT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me Alexander Joseph Brunett, to me known to be the duly appointed and acting Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Seattle and-the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington and the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. C -c)1( Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, C residing at SEA}-?7 C Commission expires: 5- GO General Power of Attorney- 3 May 03 02 01 : 18p 206-362-4381 p. 2 Project Information Site Address or Location Parcel Numbers Proposed Rectory: 215 Whitworth Avenue South 7841800090— Renton, WA 98055 Proposed Parish 314 South 4th Street 7841300035 Campus: Renton, WA 98055 7841300125 7841300120 ` 7841300105 7841300100 7841300090 -� 7841300080 7840800050- 7840800060r-- 7840800065 J 7840800070 7840800110 — 7840800105 — 7840800075 SE Lot (Proposed SE corner of Morris Avenue 7839800150 Parking Lot) and 4th Street 7839800181- 7839800185 Document Index Al Cover Sheet (this sheet) A2 Neighborhood Map and Campus Plan A3 Main Campus Site Plan 'A' A4 SE Parking Lot Site 'C' and Rectory Site 'B' A5 Main Floor Plan A6 Upper Floor Plan Architecture&Planning • rma ., Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Project Narrative for St.Anthony Catholic Church: Project Name: St.Anthony Catholic Church - Renovation and Addition Project Size Existing Site: 190,546 s.f. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Proposed Site: 216,576 s.f. CITY OF RENTON Project Address St.Anthony Parish Office: 314 South 4th Street MAY 0 2 2002 Renton,WA 98055 RECEIVED St.Anthony Parish Rectory: 215 Whitworth Ave.South Renton,WA 98055 Current Zoning Designation: Center Downtown (CD)- Urban Center Overlay District Current Site Use: St.Anthony School:Constructed in phases between 1927 and 1960,the school currently has approximately 520 students enrolled in grades K-8. Under this proposal the school will be reconfigured to better serve the changing needs of students and teachers. Parish Social Mall: Constructed in 1950,the social hall also serves as the school gymnasium, meeting hall, and youth sports center. Under this proposal the current social hall will be razed and the resulting area will be redeveloped as additional parking for the parish. Parish Church: Constructed on the site of the original wood frame structure in 1954,the current parish church was renovated in 1994 to enhance worship flexibility, and improve facility accessibility for all peoples. Under this proposal the existing church will remain unchanged. Parish Rectory: Constructed in 1908 and moved to its current location in 1952,the rectory presently houses the parish priest, Fr.Gary Zender and two associate priests,as well as choir rehearsals,the school music program and various small group meetings over any given week. Under the proposed development plan,the current rectory would be razed and rectory functions will be relocated to 215 Whitworth Avenue South.A new parish social hall will be constructed on the existing rectory site. Parish Ministry Center(P.M.C.): Originally constructed as a convent in 1957,the P'.M.C. currently serves as the administrative hub of the church.The P.M.C. houses parish offices, archives, and meeting rooms. Under this proposal the P.M.C.will be retained and integrated Into the new campus plan. _Special Site Features: The site contains no bodies of water,wetlands,or steep slopes. Current site conditions, Including subsurface conditions are summarized in the geo-technical engineering report. Solis and Drainage Statement: 19336 47th Ave.N.E. Seattle,WA 98155 PH.(206)440-0330 FAX(206)362-4381 A geo-technical engineering report has been done and is included in this submittal.This report contains both a discussion of soil types and drainage and technical recommendations for construction on the site. Proposed Use of Property: This project is an extensive renovation of and addition to the existing St. Anthony Parish Campus. The intent of the project is to enhance, expand, and integrate existing parish facilities Into a more attractive and functional facility. This project proposes the development of two phases of a multi-phase master plan. These two phases include the vacation of a portion of Whitworth Avenue South north of South 4111 Street (Ref: Renton VAC-00-003) construction of a new social hall, kitchen, gymnasium, locker rooms, additional administrative space for parish and school staff, new kindergarten classrooms and meeting rooms, on-site parking and student drop-off areas. The second phase proposes the construction of additional classrooms and program support spaces. The existing rectory will be razed prior to commencing construction of the social hall. Rectory functions will be relocated to a renovated property located to the north of the parish campus. Following the construction of the new social hall, the existing off-site social hall will be razed and replaced with landscaped parking. Proposed off-site Improvements: South 4th Street will receive landscape and utility improvements. Total Estimated Project Costs: Est. 'Hard' Costs Est.Total Cost Est. Market Value Phases I &II-j Parish $5,500,000 $5,900,000 To be determined Rectory $210,000 $252,000 To be determined Estimated quantities and types of materials Involved if any fill or excavation Is proposed As currently designed an estimated 500 cubic yards of on site material will be cut and balanced on-site during the construction process. Number,type, and size of trees to be removed: A survey of"significant"trees was conducted.The proposed project would result In the removal of some trees-these trees are Indicated, along with the proposed landscape architectural'plan. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City: - Under the proposed street vacation,VAC-00-003,4' along the existing east-west alley between Shattuck and Whitworth south of South 3rd Street will be dedicated to the city. Improvements necessary to accommodate Iwo lanes of traffic,one In each direction along the section of alley cited above shall be provided under this proposal. This proposal also Includes the vacation of an additional 120 feet of the north-south alley located between Whitworth and Morris.This request is an extension of the Initial request (VAC-00-003)and will significantly enhance on-site and off-site traffic circulation design and control.An easement granting full use of the entire vacated length will be provided for the remaining property owner at 327 Morris Avenue South - Parcel No. 7840800100. Any proposed job shacks: A temporary Job shack will be utilized for the duration of proposed construction.The proposed job shack will be placed in the northeast corner of the project. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 2 of 2 St.Anthony Catholic Church-Project Narrative for CUP Submittal Architecture&Planning '. rma Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Justification for the Conditional Use Permit for St.Anthony Catholic Church A. Project Summary. The proposed project is an extensive renovation of and addition to the existing St. Anthony Parish Campus. The current campus requires students and staff to cross arterial streets a number of times each day. While no serious accidents have occurred, addressing student safety concerns is foremost among the Parish's re-development priorities. Beyond creating a safer student environment,this project enhances the existing neighborhood environment by creating a more attractive and functional facility that more easily serves the varied needs of a quickly growing community. This project proposes the development of two phases of a multi-phase master plan. The initial phase includes the vacation of a portion of Whitworth Avenue north of South 41fi Street, construction of a new social hall, kitchen, gymnasium, locker rooms, additional administrative space for parish and school staff, new kindergarten classrooms and meeting rooms,on-site parking and student drop-off areas. The second phase proposes the construction of additional classrooms and program support spaces. The existing rectory will be razed prior to commencing construction of the social hall and rectory functions will be relocated to a renovated property located to the north of the parish campus. Following the construction of the new social hall,the existing off-site social hall will be razed and replaced with landscaped parking. Following initial meetings with the City of Renton and surrounding neighbors,the proposed project evolved to address a number of public concerns Including adequate off-street parking and potential traffic increases on public streets adjacent to the site. Through a series of neighborhood meetings the parish and design team solicited input and then presented a series of evolving design proposals responding to these concerns. The current proposal addresses all community concerns by providing vehicle and pedestrian access through the site(between the existing church and proposed social hall), improving on site vehicle circulation by creating two-way drive aisles, and increasing available parking through the acquisition of additional property. In addition, proposed exterior finish materials and colors will be compatible with the existing school, parish ministry center, and church. The consolidated building will provide enhanced school facilities, increased building safety and security and eliminate current child-safety,traffic, and neighborhood parking problems. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY ��OFg�RENTON MAY 02c002 19336 47th Ave.N.E. RECEIVED Seattle,WA 98155 PH.(206)440-0330 FAX(206)362.4381 ~ I B. Compliance with CUP Criteria. The proposal meets the standards for approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit standards are set forth below, in Italics,followed by a demonstration of how the proposal meets each standard. A. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and any other plan, program, map, or ordinance of the City of Renton. The existing St.Anthony Parish 'campus' currently comprises five buildings located along South 4th Street between Shattuck Avenue South and Smlthers Avenue South. Established in 1905,the parish is a committed member of both the City of Renton community and its immediate neighborhood. The'campus' Is loosely tied together visually through the use of similar materials and limited architectural detailing. The structures are well maintained and intensively used each day. The Parish maintains a significant neighborhood presence,functioning as both a spiritual and symbolic center and holds a wealth of collective memories for many Renton residents. In the past decade,the parish has continued to grow and expand its programming and services. As a result of these expanded services and programs,the current buildings are intensively used each day. The constant use of the facilities is increasingly impacting neighboring properties; parking is a particular concern of both the parish administration and neighbors. At times of peak usage(including the short time periods for daily student drop-off and pick-up)existing on site parking areas are inadequate, and current traffic circulation patterns effectively create localized neighborhood gridlock. Neighboring property owners have complained to the parish about the traffic congestion and indicate that ithey have been blocked Into garages or on alleys. To lessen the Impact on neighbors,the parish currently queues vehicles 3 and 4 deep on Sunday mornings and each weekday before and after school. In this configuration approximately 127 parking spaces are available for use. Following Phase I construction,the total off-street parking will rise to 230 cars(an 83% increase). This will accommodate usual daily and weekend parking needs for the parish. In addition,the revised site plan provides better traffic flow capacity for school access due to the widening of the northern alley, and provides better access from the proposed school entry to the pick up area. A traffic impact analysis conducted by the firm Transportation Planning and Engineering(TP&E),supports the improved parking and traffic flow that accompany the proposed project. The current St.Anthony Parish campus comprises five discrete buildings. Students at the parish school currently use several buildings on a daily basis. Gym classes are held in the social hall building,two blocks from the school, and the children have to cross three city arterials each way. Music is held in the rectory basement, one arterial away. Religious services are held in the church,one arterial away. The disconnected nature of the various parish buildings forces these students as well as faculty and parish staff onto and across several streets per day creating a potential hazard to pedestrians and Impeding Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 2 of 7 St.Anthony Catholic Church-Justification for CUP Submittal smooth traffic circulation. While close supervision has allowed this to occur without incident in past years,students, parents, neighbors, and administration are all concerned about the safety of these children. Historically a smaller parish population and a lightly developed neighboring community mitigated these conditions. Renton's continued growth and present zoning prescribe Increasing densities in and around the parish site. The parish community Is increasingly concerned about the welfare of its members and maintaining good will among the majority of local residents. Recognizing both the inadequacy of existing facilities and the increasing demands of a growing community,the parish has undertaken this multi-phase redevelopment plan. The plan addresses the needs of the parish family as well as those of Its neighbors by significantly increasing the available number of on-site parking stalls, and developing a new school gymnasium The proposed project complies with and enhances the goals of the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project advances many of the conceptual and physical goals of the comprehensive plan Including the following policies: The St. Anthony's campus is within the Urban Center Boundary for Downtown. Plan, page 1-5. The following Comprehensive Plan policies relevant to development within Centers are advanced by the proposal: • LU-87:1Centers should provide community focus for their surrounding neighborhoods. By consolidating and expanding present parish facilities,the enhanced campus will become a more focused neighborhood and community center. Reconfiguring, expanding,and improving the existing parking facilities also improves the boundary definition along the new campus edge. The St.Antho ny's Parish Campus, as expanded, provides a community focus for the surrounding downtown neighborhood, and will continue to provide a community focus as the downtown neighborhood develops with higher intensity residential and retail uses. As downtown retail expands, it is likely that parish visitors will combine trips downtown to the parish and to the adjacent retail area. Similarly, as the downtown residential area becomes denser,the expanded parish will be available to provide community services to the surrounding neighborhood. Religious facilities are treated more specifically within the Comprehensive Plan policies regarding Public Facilities. General policies regarding Public Facilities which are advanced by,the St.Anthony's proposal include: • LU-2211:Site and building design should be oriented primarily toward pedestrians, especially in the downtown area,with provisions for transit and automobiles as well. Rutledge Maul Architects.P.S.Inc. Page 3 of 7 St Anthony Catholic Church-Justification for CUP Submittal • LU-223: Facilities should be located within pedestrian range of an existing or planned transit stop. • LU-224: Primary vehicular access to sites should be from principal or minor arterials. • LU-228: Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian oriented. These policies are advanced because the revised St.Anthony's campus plan provides substantially more pedestrian amenities than the current parish campus and Is located within pedestrian range of an existing and/or planned transit stop. See Comprehensive Plan,Figure 21 3,Transit Plan,showing transit availability at South 3rd Street and Morris Avenue South. The proposal increases pedestrian safety. Primary vehicular access is from a minor,arterial. Although private schools are not separately addressed within the Comprehensive Plan, the proposal 'advances the general objective of the City's Comprehensive Plan regarding schools: • LU-KK:Assure adequate land at appropriate locations for facilities which meet the educational needs of area residents. • LU-255: Safe pedestrian access to schools should be promoted(e.g.through pedestrian linkages,safety features)through the design of new subdivisions and roadway Improvements. As described,above,the proposal assures that the St.Anthony's school can continue to operate to meet the educational needs of area children for many years to come and to do so safely even as the remainder of downtown area develops more intensively. All of the Citys Comprehensive Plan policies regarding the siting of Religious Facilities are advanced by the proposal,when those policies are read as applying to an expansion of an existing facility. (The policies were drafted In anticipation of the siting of new religious facilities.) The Religious Facilities policies are: • LU-MM:Site religious and ancillary facilities in a manner which provides convenient transportation access and minimizes their adverse Impacts on adjacent land uses. • LU-260: When locating In predominantly residential areas, religious facilities should be on the periphery of the residential area rather than the interior. • LU-261: Parking should be provided on-site and buffered from adjacent uses. • LU-262: Large-scale facilities should be encouraged to locate contiguous to an existing or planned transit route, • LU-263: Religious facilities should be located on and have direct access to either a principal, minor or collector arterial street. • LU-264: Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian oriented. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 4 of 7 St.Anthony Catholic Church-Justification for CUP Submittal Here,the St.Anthony's campus is adjacent to Shattuck Avenue which forms a boundary between the existing downtown residential and business district and the entirely business district Immediately to the west along Rainier Avenue South. Thus,the facility is on the periphery of the residential area, rather than the Interior. As noted above, parking will be provided on-Site and will be appropriately buffered per city code requirements from adjacent uses. The facility is near existing and planned transit routes,and is located to have direct access to South 4th Street, a minor arterial. Finally, Internal site circulation is pedestrian oriented. In an effort toll reduce the dominance of the automobile in urban design a number of policies offer guidance on dealing with the automobile on and around project sites. The proposed project specifically advances a number of these policies: • LU-108: Consolidate access to existing streets and provide internal vehicular circulation which supports shared access. • LU-109: Provide vehicular access to the site from a principal arterial street and minimize the number of access points. • LU-255:Safe pedestrian access to schools should be promoted(e.g.through pedestrian linkages,safety features)through the design of new subdivisions and roadway improvements. • LU-261: Parking should be provided on site buffered from adjacent uses. • DT A: Create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton while fulfilling the requirements of an Urban Center as defined by countywide policies. • DT-30:1The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each Individual business. • DT-33:1Alternatives to individual on-site parking(e.g.fees in lieu of parking, parking management district,downtown parking fund,joint public/private structures, should be explored). • DT-48:,ISite and building designs(e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; parking)should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place.and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. These policies are advanced through the revised campus access points,the possiblilly of shared parking of the church lot,the revitalization of some older structures, and enhanced unity of architectural features on the parish campus. The renovation and expansion of St.Anthony and the removal of portables and various run down structures add to the revitalization of downtown. In addition ta advancing many policies of the Comprehensive Plan,the proposed campus enhancements comply with or exceed the City's code requirements for a project of this,type. For example,the proposal exceeds the landscaping requirement for parking lots,complies with all setbacks and street landscaping requirements, maintains pedestrian access through the project, and brings the kindergarten and first grade classrooms up to building code by providing classrooms at ground level. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 5 of 7 St.Anthony Catholic'Church-Justification for CUP Submittal it B. Community Need:There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community, need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors among all other relevant Information: • The proposed location shall not result In either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the Immediate area of the proposed use. • That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The St.Anthony's community includes 2,111 families In the Renton area. As noted above, parish use of the existing facilities Is intense, and is expected to continue to grow. The parish has been located on this site for almost 100 years. There will be no detrimental over-concentration of churches within the City or the immediate area of the proposed parish expansion and the proposed location is well suited for the expansion, as It is the site of the existing parish facilities. C. Effect on adjacent properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property In an effort to address the concerns of property owners within the immediate vicinity,the Parish hosted a series of neighborhood meetings. Prior to each meeting notices were mailed to all addresses within 300 feet of the church. These notices provided a summary of the Information to be presented as well the location and date of each meeting. The first neighborhood meetings were held on June 12,2000. The goal of each meeting was to present a current overview of the proposed development plan and receive public comments on that plan. Following each of these meetings,the architect, in coordination with the parish building committee,worked to address any concerns raised about the proposed plan. A master plan was then finalized and submitted to the City as part of a street vacation petition. The vacation)request necessitated a public hearing before the City Council. Additional neighborhood concerns were raised at that hearing and at a Parish sponsored community meeting on June 14,2001. The City's review of the street vacation request highlighted two issues of concern to a small number of immediately adjacent neighbors -the restriction of pedestrian traffic flow,and the perception that the vacation did not serve the public good. The project plans were again revised. A final neighborhood meeting was,announced and held February 15,2002. The submitted plan specifically addresses these final concerns including: • increasing on-site parking from approximately 127 to 230 fully improved stalls including additional parking for the disabled. Emergency vehicle access is also Improved on-site by providing two-way vehicle aisles, legal turn radiuses,and proper curb striping. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 6 of 7 St.Anthony Catholic Church-Justification for CUP Submittal • Reconfiguring initial plans to direct Increased on-site parking traffic onto South 4th Street rather than onto Morris Avenue South as originally proposed. • Reducing disruption to Morris Avenue South adjacent to the current parish social hall because there will be no church access directly onto Morris Avenue north of S.4Th Street. • Increasing safety of children attending St.Anthony School by reducing necessary daily street crossings. The potential restriction of pedestrian flow is limited to the area of Whitworth Avenue south of the ciampus. Whitworth, however, dead-ends In less than one block along the railroad tracks that are located just to the south of the campus. Feedback from neighbors living on that block indicated that they cared less about"pedestrian links" than they did about mitigating off-site parish parking and the peak period traffic congestion. The vacation!and the CUP for the unified campus will have no substantial or undue adverse Impacts on adjacent properties. In fact,the proposal will benefit the public in several ways.. • Properly owners on the dead end of Whitworth will benefit from an improved level of service at 4Th and Whitworth. • Property and business owners north of the site will benefit from improved traffic circulation and parking due to the alley widening and the addition of off-street parking. • The addition of off-street parking provides a meaningful alternative to church use of existing street parking on all adjacent streets. • The addition of off-street parking could be shared by agreement with the church for non-church use hours. This new parking would be a direct benefit to the public. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. Page 7 of 7 St.Anthony Catholic Church-Justification for CUP Submittal • Lighting Summary LTG—SUM 1997 Washington Slate Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forme First Edition — June. 1998 Project Ink Project Address Si— AK1410 n F�r 1151'� Dote , „24_,vt i For Building Deportment Use 3l S411 . ReAchn 1 via g8055 Applicant Nome: ZA,f.{ G ' Jt�a . � �,15 cP Applicant Address:/T33/ Q7'1 Av� WE 5 Ie. Applicant Phone: T Lv C'�O(p� 41"4+b^03' A Project Description 0 New Building XAddition 0 Alteration Compliance Option ❑Prescriptiveighting Power Allowonce 0 System Analysis (See 0uolifcotion Checklist (over). Indicated Prescriptive do LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Excerptions 0 No changes ore being made to the lighting (check appropriate box) , ❑Less than 60X of the fixtures ore new, and the installed wattage is not being increased Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Locution - Allowed (floor/room no.) I Occupancy Description Watts per.ft2" Area in ft2 Allowed x Area •• From Table 15-1 (over) — document all exceptions on form LTG—LPA Total Allowed Watts Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Use mfgr Iisted maximum input wattage. For fixtures with hard—wired ballasts only. the default table in the NREC Technical Reference Manual may also be used. Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor/room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed • Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Allowed Watts Area in ft2 Allowed Watts Location per ft2 or per If ;or If for perimeter; x ft2 (or x If) Covered Parking Description 0.2 W/ft2 Open Parking 0.2 W/ft2 Outdoor Areas 1 0.2 W/ft2 145 Ifl 2fft 3S Bldg. (by facade) 0.25 W/ft2 Bldg. (by perim) 7.5 W/If 17 9 C 13 442 Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but not both) Total Allowed Watts jeto .tea Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior)Usee mfgrdefault listedtable maximumintheNREC input wattage.Technical ForReference Ma fixtures withnual may hard—wialsoredbe ballastsused only. th . Number of Watts/ Watts Location _ 1 Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed T�y r'e; 51 + 53 (II) 2.5o coi4Ps 15 2?0 4350 - Tie. 52. (&)2. co 14PS 4 550 232.4) Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 4 670 . Lighting Permit Plans Checklist LTG—CHK 1997 Washington Slate Nonresidenptial Energy Code Compliance Forms j� rust Edition — June. t99t1 Project Address 1 A-4.'thah �t0.1'-15hi 514- 5 4:61 �7., T it6r ?Bo5s Date3^2 '"c2. Thee following hinformton is necessary to check a lighting permit application for compliance with the lighting requirements in the 1994 Washington State Non-residentiol Energy Code. Applicability Code Location Building Deportment (circle) Section Component Information Required on Plans Notes LIGHTING CONTROLS (Section 1513) yes no tea. 1513.1 Local control/access Schedule with type, indicate locations yes no CD 1513.2 'Area controls Maximum limit per switch 1513.3 Daylight zone control Schedule with type and features, indicate locations yes no n.a. vertical glazing Indicate vertical glazing on plans yes no n, overhead glazing Indicate overhead glazing on plans yes n n.a 1513.4 Display/exhib/special Indicate separate controls 1513.5 Exterior shut-off Schedule with type and features, indicate location o n.e. (a) timer w/bockup Indicate location Ea, yes no n.e. (b) photocell. Indicate location COW 1513.6 Inter. auto shut-off Indicate location _ yes no 0 1513.6.1 (a) occup. sensors Schedule with type and locations 1513.6.2 (b) auto. switches Schedule with type and features (back-up, override capability); yes no n.e. Indicate size of zone on pions LIGHTING WATTAGE! (Section 1520-22 or 1530-32) yes . Lighting Sum. Form Completed and attached. Schedule with fixture types, Ea i lamps, ballasts, watts per fixture I SEE MECH I lElec motor efficiency MECH-MOT or Equipment Schedule with hp. rpm. efficiency I If 'no' is circled for at'y question. provide explanation: . it , o • CP' O 14° tiry I. ti0 90 ti0 ti6 tit 142 1'y 06 Oh CP CP ON. O' O'i O• O' O• O' O' O• O' O' O'. O' O• O' O' O' O• 1 Oh yO 1,0 51 AY 0.6 A9 AO A 50 \,1 ryq• 1. 10 01 Ob. O`L Oh ,,,,I, E ' " 2 1'I_ 6`6 A0 ,y1 6 0it 10O O' O• 9• O' O• O' O O• O' '64 by ,49 y110 1A061• O' o 0• 0• 0• 0' 00 16I ^,,1' y0 cll.' � O 6 4h ti 42 ' '6 ,46 I, 10 1 1 O' o• Q.• ' � ry' y' ` O• , O' O' o' o' • y 0 ,yT Y 6h 'h 06 Ay)A ° y° OA l 'b '1 1A /ti1 9 9' o• ry• A' - IS,a y• yO' 9' 9• 9' O. OA ,y0 y6 61 A0 to"' 'b "6 ti •\• 6 ,b6 ,l'9 1h 6 ) ,fI'' -.S. i -..''••,,al- ' 9,c° .- N,N, •ty, ,i1 1., 6 6 /P. 1 Oti OA 10 \.,sc. CP a a1 y1. AO by 16 10 06 :: t O b 1A \� •��`'��-'` • A ,y1 h 10 00 Oh 09o• o• `• 'o y• 9• o• o• o' o• O•O'S 01 h :.��. 6 i. 0 6 6 '9 06 CP' O'l. •• o• O' O• O' O' o ---mmw� •. o• O O O o O1 1 O'l, O'h O�i 00 1A 16 1A A- try 06 06 Oy OA O'9 Ory OS O' O' O' O' O' O' O• O• O' O' O• O• O' O' 0 I I I I Site Plan View Scale: 1"=20' i Ea:Eriy : ST'ANTHONY PARISH - STAFF PARKING LOT - "'='Sryi 314 S 4TH ST,RENTON,WA .; ;t1' r: ABOSSEIN ENGINEERING BELLEVUE,WA 1 1/21/02 Prepared for: Project No.:21057 I Output generated by GENESYS II. Copyright 1999. • • 0----0 O • 0 u^ -O -o o O-0 O O .0-o O .pS .pS •p2 .pS •Os •OS •pv, •p2 •p •pv, •Os •pv, •p2 •pe -pp •pp alley •0 •o - •0 •<= O •O •0 •o •0 - •o •O •O 0 9. . :tf*radr( • ,-. U3 4. • ..(;) ) \le •O., •0.? �' .V Itt ..-j y ••) 1 . n •O O p . .. .. - •A I •- . " VA. I .0 •A •O O • 9 --'9 p '1 •2S 'OO •O O •O `sue •O •O •u •. •O •O •O •,r •O O •)S •)I •60 )-� )) .), • . 6 S •)n s .05, .22 •,I,I . •0 •0 •0 •0 •O . •0 •0 •.1 •0 •0 •0 •O •. •0 0 • •06, I .s� •Co •S9 ' .S °.,6 '`SS •F.� '`r�5` •22 •IA ° p p ii. p .i D s 1-® .S� .gyp _ :F •O •• =�• • '65 'A, %I •)6, •0 -0 d • - .6 - . . . .,I ••„ 4, (e•e . --•o. .-- •'‘4 1 1 r• :• 1 . • L"' (I) �S 1 •7 �' 19.n( IO •9 C% 9 •V' H5t) , A 1'- • #41lk • - V ' oilioNtl , -0 • 69 )0 •SF �4.1.� 'S. •)6 hi ') i 31' cn ' i •O •O •O •O •O •O .0. •O •O •O •O •O O - ' <.o i . .`,2 .26 .2) .,I� •OS "06, .'K .2V .22 '•lS .2�• / . / •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •0 •O •0 •0 •0 • 0 -'O •2 ••I 'O •0 . 'O •O •O '0 . 'O •0 '0 •O ••I 'c' •S � • 9 O 9 9 9 v� c� 2 .� p 9 S S ) 1 1 --0--�0- ---0 0 0-0,-0 -0 0-O-0--0 0--0 0 . > '09 'OS '02 •'02 •O.I 'O•I •O'I •0•I ••p,I •p.1 •O2 •02 •0 •0) •I2 Iv • • t�l .O r// /:..�:" et. O O (1.. % 'C., ':k. • .2) .( .8 1v • 0 '`1—� O'f 1. 4 ''is / .'0 .'Z �6 O q 0 % q i cu ��Iti�l • co 4, cb o ti n o .6 •4 y• . _ I.�t 6 6 • qo O• 1'I q C• C� ei °O OcIr G•i 41' 4o fir► qo° ,tic 0�° q s '�1, ti0 rTc 0 66 4 �. .�— :1 • .n 6 1: .6 .6 .6 4 ek. .'c •c .6 • o •C• a o c, `. �•.v ti. 0 ti c, . o 4 'o V 1, . ..•£ o 'o O q ▪O • O O —'• �r I; .O • .6 '� O O 6 ZK69NI c •4 6 6 • O_ O O O O 6 1)Yr I N% t •6 to vO 0ti, .04, hg, rat' ' /f%, c",.;e6,6' '` q ,40„ o - O O O O 6 1ill6 1 4: tip q0 �0. qti 0ti 01, \• ., • °� ti V°', • d 6 .O .6 .O 6 .6 4, `n c„c, �' ,• ti° • '0 co' v° 0° 'li' • ; ti • 0 0 G° ti0) O- \" ▪O O 6' O O 6 O •, •. O • • ' d 6' 6 6 6 6 :�• .6 .6 •i° ••�° 4,° •�°P 4c' Ob •• •' 1,' , 0' (o' .'a.' .O .6 .6 .6` .6 •.6 • . . • .6 .O 0 6 6 6 .. 6 6 ��..—I—.� � .o do do do qo titi 0ti ., 4) o ,, ,. 4ti '. ▪d O 6 6 O 6 .6( • . Oo .„0 i$ co v° cj1' 61' • • 04 •0 .- .013 1ti . mo ▪O O O O O O : • I O° do .`O . to q° �ti o •0 r ` emg °7° 6 O O O O 6 : 4I� We rv' • ▪o •o .o .6 .0 .o ' .0 .O 45- ••• •o .. .• • o° 00 .o° oo do do titi 0 0' . eQL- <3C 0ti q° *Co() , • . • • i/ • O• O• O• O• O• o• O• O• O•, O• O• O• • . 1 oti oti O3 . ,o 34 , .r, - •: 04 ti� Oo 0,/_ 1II oti . 4• 9• 4• o� _2'�g' O .i. 0 ♦• O• 0• ♦ . , ',� ry , o. �� c o. oti ,: ti•1 :k+ ,>,' ' �t�; ♦;, ..oti ` o 0p I,yO ,b'y �, y "^� cbc) \,b (0o \ ti • ti ti ti o• 0• e 0 • '>• ' • • ' • ♦• O• OcO• I,y� 4O ' . 0'3 O ' O� 03 , - (O� ,♦ by 1►.' O O• O . .. •• O' O' 0\ ,zt rl, ,\• �• wry ti ,� 3p O^ I rlh .' ,O oI l• �Ih ^A.�^ 1 �� Ord, • P . O I:. '> �'4r p' '3 �� )0 Ir . IIN ci`;\,_,_„• , .' ,.. •>, ,f,Itim • , (1' I:* I 44 • 4c) . 1.. 4 t,,q, . : : c: • r,2• wad, r. Q. • • • ,....„ . 1 ,;. 4c,''' ti• _ of /♦ . / �'. ilk* i • � ` • IO �' 'yo \ Ol' •,•1 . • A. a41.: .• Niti i p' i,z,\ 1 (1,32 . g , : ',-, .±* irP� l2E0-fr0 . GENERAL CONTRACTORS April 15, 2002 Mark Stine RECEIVED Rutledge Maul Architects 19336 47th Avenue NE APR 2 2 2002 Seattle, WA 98155 10-LED,E,MAUL ARCHITECTS Re: St. Anthony Parish Dear Mark: j The following'are answers to questions relayed in your e-mail that the City of Renton wanted addressed in Ole permit application. 1. Proposed construction dates: Right now, we are looking at June 2003 to August 2004. 2. Hours of operation: Proposed work hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Saturday and Sunday work would be on a limited basis if required, and only with the proper authority's permission. 3. Proposed hauling/transportation routes: We do not anticipate a lot of import and export of dirt materials from the site. This would be determined later, closer to our construction time. It is too early to know where dirt materials will be coming from and where they would be going.,In general, most of the material would be coming from Highway 167/Rainier Ave. N. around the south side of K-Mart, on S. 4th Place, returning to 167/Rainer Ave. N. on the north side of K-Mart, on S. 3rd Place. 4. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and any noxious characteristics: For traffic impacts please see Item 3 above. Erosion control measures will be noted on the Civil drawings. Mud and dust will be controlled in the conventional manner with water and street sweeping equipment according to City standards. Noise will be controlled in the conventional manner; trucks and equipment will have normally operating mufflers and exhaust systems. All work will be done per applicable codes and ordinances. It is anticipated that these items will be reviewed in the pre-construction meeting with the City. 5. Any specialty hours proposed for construction hauling (i.e., weekends, late nights): Please see Item 2 above. None are anticipated or foreseen at this time. If weather and site conditions permit, and all parties agree, arrangements may be requested. 6. Preliminary traffic control plan: Please see Item 3 above. The individual subcontractors will submit specific plans for work in the City right-of-way at the time of the pre-construction meeting for each permit. I hope this is the detail of information you need. Please don't hesitate to call me if the questions are not in the format you need, or if you have any questions. Thank you! Sincerely, `�EVELOPME p 471" clTy pF REN7pNNING Pat Oda MAY 0 2 2002 General Manager RECEIVE® P.O. Box 1370 • (253)770-5858 • Fax(253)770-5277 • Sumner,WA 98390-0280 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2223-112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 101 -BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004-2952 VICTOR H.BISHOP,RE.President TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENGER,P.E.Vice President I FACSIMILE(425)453-5759 March 1, 2002 RECEIVED MAR 0 5 2002 Mr. Greg McNabb U1LEp MAUL ARCRIECCS ST. ANTHONY PARISH DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 314 S. 4th St. CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 0 Re: St. Anthony Parish Master Plan RECEiVE® Traffic Impact Analysis Update Dear Mr. McNabb: We have reviewed the revised St. Anthony Parish Master Site Plan received from Rutledge Maul Architects on February 27, 2002. The revised plan is separated into two phases. The first phase would construct a new social hall, gymnasium, parish offices, kindergarten class rooms and all proposed parking areas. The second phase would construct additional class rooms. This letter updates our previous St. Anthony Master Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, dated November 21, 2000. As presented our previous report, the proposed project would not increase the student capacity of the school. Below is a discussion of the significant changes to the site plan. 1. The previous general purpose vehicular site access onto Morris Ave. S. has been removed, resulting in a projected 77% decrease in traffic volume on Morris Ave. S. during the AM school peak hour and a 48% decrease during the PM school peak hour compared with the previous site plan. No emergency vehicle access onto Morris Ave. S. is proposed. The new vehicle access configuration to S. 4th St. discussed below prevents the need for any type of access onto Morris Ave. South. 2. The revised site plan utilizes the existing alley west of the church building to access S. 4th St., replacing the site access removed from Morris Ave. South. This will refocus the parish's vehicular activity away from the residential character of Morris Ave. S. to the commercial nature of S. 4th Street. Because S. 4th St. is a wider street than Morris Ave. S., this will facilitate turning movements entering and exiting the alley access better than the previous plan. The alley would be widened from 20 feet to 24 feet between S. 4th St. and the school parking lot. The alley is located midway between Whitworth Ave. S. and Morris Ave. S., providing the best possible spacing of intersections along S. 4th Street. This plan creates no new vehicular site accesses onto the street network. 3. The previous site plan boundary has been expanded with the acquisition of two additional properties located at the northeast corner of the revised site plan. This area is shown with parking for 29 compact cars in a location convenient for church use. C:1Projects1R0684001R0695011tr2.doc Mr. Greg McNabb ST. ANTHONY'PARISH March 1, 2002 Page -2 - 4. Under thie previous site plan, the existing social hall and house located on the southeast corner of the S. 4th St./Morris Ave. S. intersection were proposed to be removed and replaced with a surface parking lot during a later phase of the master plan. The revised site plan shows this happening concurrent with phase 1, adding 75 stalls convenient for church use. These new stalls would alleviate some of the on-street parking impacts currently felt on Sunday mornings by the neighboring residents. 5. The tots' on-site parking supply after phase 1 would be 232 stalls compared with the existing on-site parking supply for only about 127 cars, an 83% increase. If the school portablebuildings can be removed from the site after a future remodeling of the existing school building, the total stalls would increase to 254 stalls, doubling the existing on-site parking supply. Approximately 75 additional parking stalls are available for use off-site on various commercial properties surrounding the site. In addition, there are at least 300 on- street parking stalls in the area bounded by Shattuck Ave. S., Burnett Ave. S., S. 3rd St. and the railroad tracks. On Sunday, September 9, 2001, parking data was collected during the Nike.4tted morning church masses in the area described above. Sunday mornings are considered to eAvitoN generate the peak parking demand for the parish. It was found that the peak parking demand in this area occurred at 10:45 AM at 419 cars, including demand from the Spirit of Washington train depot. This compares to an existing total parking supply of about 502 stalls (83% utilized) and the future parking supply of 607 stalls (69% utilized). 1 6. The staff parking lot consisting of six stalls immediately east of the existing school building with access onto S. 4th St. has been removed from the site plan. The staff parking lot opposite Whitworth Ave. S. remains on the revised site plan, consisting of five stalls and access to a truck loading bay. Please contact me anytime if you need further information at 425-455-5320 or bobh(a).tranplaneng.corn. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Ve6141- V-6v14AAA4----- Robert M. Herman, P.E., P.T.O.E. RMH:rmh Associate Cc: Mark Stine RUTLEDGE MAUL ARCHITECTS 19336 1 47th Ave. N.E. Seattle, WA 98155 C:IProjectslR0695011R0695011tr2.doc r � WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of lanc. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you sulimit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checkliit for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project,""applicant,"and"property or site"should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: St Anthony Catholic Church Addition 2. Name of applicant: St Anthony Parish 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 314 South 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Rutledge Maul Architects-Mark Stine(206)440-0330 4. Date checklist prepared: March 15,2002 5. Agency requesting checklist City of Renton Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Start construction of Phase I at the beginning of summer,2003.Complete Phase I in summer,2004. Phase II schedule to be within S years. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The church has a twenty-year plan for expansion that is beyond the timeline of any existing review procedures at The City of Renton. DEVELOPMENT P CITY OF REN pNNING RECEIVED 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. Right of Way vaications of portions of Whitworth Avenue and alley separating property parcels. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. Conditional Use Permit,Building Permits 11. Give brie;complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This project is a two phase renovation and addition of an existing church and K 8 parochial school complex Phase I proposes to add a new gymansium,provide new kindergarten dassrooms,add meeting space,replace the existing social hall with anew building,relocate the rectory off-site and provide additional on-site parking.Phase II would add an updated school administration office and add a new library and classrooms. The project includes a proposal to vacate portions)of Whitworth Avenue and portions of alleys surrounded by the project The current site area is 196,315 SF,the ROW vacations would result in a total proposed area of 216,576 SF. The proposed building footprint would total 65,749 SF 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Main Campus:314 South 4th Street,Renton, WA 98055 East of Shattuck Avenue,west of Morris Avenue,north of South 4th Street and south of an alley 120'south of 3rd Street Rectory Site:215 Whitworth Avenue S,Renton, WA 98055 East of WhitworthlAve and between South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 3% 2 r -- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland - loose fill soils and soft native sandy silt soils underlain by fine-grained, medium-dense to dense,silty sand approx. 7-18 feet below grade. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. i No e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling,slight grading for constrution and site drainage f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. No i g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? 80% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: None a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No emmisions beyond those generated by standard construction practices ' I b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None kniown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: None ' 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Runoff will be generated from existing and proposed impervious areas.This runoff will be collected in catch basins and routed via pipe to an on-site water quality facility prior to being discharged to the existing storm drainage system off site.Due to the developed increase of only 0.07 CFS above the existing 100-year storm event,flow control is not required Once off-site,storm water flows through existing pipes eventually ending up in the!P--1 Drainage Channel approx.1 mile downstream of the site 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Run-off will be collected into an on site storm water system and routed through a water quality vault or tank 4. Plants r a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other X evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain • wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulhush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The proposal involves the removal of about 6 small evergreens and 4 small deciduous trees and several small shrubs. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation ion the site,if any: The landscape plan enhances the existing street tree plan and provides for more new trees of simikr type than are being removed Native species have been chosen to reduce the amount of maintenance required for healthy landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other: starling,crows,pigeons mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 5 - I TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. The project will expand the current use of electricity and natural gas for light and heat generation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? Ifso,generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The new structures will comply with the current Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No • 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? light city traffic,occasional aircraft noise. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Noises associated with standard construction practices and noise from children playing(existing codition). 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: None 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as a church and K-8 school complex The adjacent properties are a mix of residential and small business. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Stone and brick church,3-floor brick rectory,3-floor brick admin building,3-floor brick school,2 portable units housing 4 school rooms, one brick house and 10 wood framed houses with detached garages,and a brick social hall/gymnasium. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? 10 of the 11 houses along with their garages will be demolished The existing social hall/gymnasium will be demolished after project completion. The existing brick rectory will also be demolished e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Center Downtown(CD) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban Center Design Overlay District g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There are currently about 60 people that work at this location. This number will be unchanged for the completed project j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 15 people(two of the residences are occupied by emplyees of the church) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Adequate notice will be given to all tenants to allow them ample time to find new housing and relocate before actions are taken TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: This proposal provides much needed off-street parking and consolidates the structures into a more intense area. The use is existing and is also allowed in the current zone as a conditional use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing. The only housing to be provided is for three clergy members housed in one unit. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, - middle,or low-income lhousing. 10(ten),middletincome c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The tallest proposed structure to the roof peak is 40'.The principal exterior materials are to be CMU,stucco and brick b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: Additional landscaping and screening of service areas. 11. Light and glare I a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting will be provided in the parking areas to comply with current city codes for minimum light levels in a way to minimize light pollution. b. Could light or glare frol the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None 8 TO BE COMPUTED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? walking,cycling,athletic fields,theater,dining,and other urban oriented recreation. b. Would the,proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: The proposal has additonal parking that could be used for dinner train parking. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed Measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None 14. Transpo tation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Major arterials serving the site include Martin Luther King Jr. Way and Rainier Ave S.MLEJr. Way turns into Sourh 3rd Street which runs East directly North of the proposed project South 2nd Street carries traffic West towards MLK Jr. Way also to the North of the site. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 230 total stalls upon completion of Phase I d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. The Renton Municipal airport lies approx.1.6 miles to the North. The Washington Dinner Train rail line is one block south and runs in the EastWest direction. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. No new trips per day will be added The new structures provide for much needed replacement of existing uses. The addtional area will allow certain uses to move out of areas that are currently serving more than one use. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Widening of alley to the north to allow two-way access.Provide two-way access from South 4th Street through the project to Whitworth Avenue where it enters the site to the North.Addition of 118 off-street parking stalls. 75 of which are accessed from a different direction. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. The new structures will be constructed to meet current building and fire codes which includes the implementation of fire-sprinklers 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv- ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. All above utilities are currently available with the exception of a septic system which is not needed or allowed b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Only existing utilities will be used C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to decision. Signature: Date Submitted: I�..:/LI.GI�,„ 10 I ' I TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECF ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air,pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? PropOsed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 12 GEOTECH 13256 Northeast 20th Street,Suite 16 Bellevue,Washington 98005 CONSULTANTS, INC. (425)747-5618 FAX(425)747-8561 February 27, 2001 JN 01031 Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle Office of Property and Construction 910 Marion Street Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: Ed Foster Subject: Transmittal Letter—Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Saint Anthony's Parish South 4th Street and Whitworth Avenue South Renton, Washington i Dear Mr. Foster: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed Saint Anthony's Parish to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-5259, dated September 21, 2001. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, 0 CH CONSULTANTS, INC. - 1 • D. Robert Ward, P.E. Principal DRW: me r DEVELOPMENT PCITY OF RENT'O T—F NNING MAY 0 2 2002 RECEWE® 1 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Saint Anthony's Parish South 4th Street and Whitworth Avenue South Renton,Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed Saint Anthony's Catholic Parish to be located in Renton, Washington. • We were provided with a preliminary site plan. Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S., Inc. (RMA) developed this plan dated February 1, 2001. Based on this plan and conversations with RMA, the development of the site will include a large multi-floor school building on the southern portion of the site. The school building will house multiple classrooms, offices, a social hall, and a gymnasium. RMA indicated that the plans are still in the development stage and the site plan provided is preliminary. The numbers of floors of the building were not given, but the current site plan calls for the building to be built on, or near, the existing grade. We understand that there will be an underground retention vault for the site. Its location was not indicated on the plan provided to us. The only other excavations we anticipate for the site are for the installation of underground utilities. In cooperation with the City of Renton, Saint Anthony's Parish will take ownership and occupy the street and right-of-way of Whitworth Avenue South, just north of the intersection of Whitworth Avenue South and South 4th Street. Approximately half of the length of Whitworth Avenue South between South 4th and South 3rd Streets will be given to the parish in exchange for property with frontage on South 3rd Street to the north. We anticipate that at least four single-family residences along Whitworth Avenue South will be demolished for construction of the project. Pavement areas will be placed on the northern and eastern sides of the site for this project. We anticipate that the pavement will be existing grade. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The parish currently occupies approximately two blocks north of South 4th Street, between Morris Avenue South and Shattuck Avenue South to the east and west, respectively. Whitworth Avenue South splits the site into two parcels at this time. The parish site is currently developed with multiple ,buildings. East of Whitworth Avenue South is occupied by a large church, a single-family residence, and a parking lot. On the western side of Whitworth Avenue South, a large multiple story administration building exists with the multiple-story school to the west. All of the buildings are of either brick construction of have a brick façade. A large asphalt area covers most of the remainder of the site west of Whitworth Avenue South. Four single-family residences exist east of Whitworth Avenue South north of the current parish buildings; they appeared to be vacant during our site visit. These residences appeared to have partial or full ;basements. The foundation type of the residences are not known. We anticipate these houses will be demolished as part of the construction project. • The total plans and construction details of the existing parish buildings were not made known to us. We understand that the administration building and the church have below-grade or partially below- grade basements. According to the administration staff of the parish, the church is constructed on GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Ai,..,Lishop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27, 2001 Page 2 concrete pillars of unknown size and depth, while the school has been constructed on driven wood piles, of unknown depth. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling five test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction,,anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the • scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were drilled on February 6, 2001, using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 7. Soil Conditions The uppermost soil encountered in the test borings was loose fill soils and soft native sandy silt soils. This soft material is underlain by fine-grained, medium-dense to dense, silty sand approximately 7 to 18 feet below grade. The silty sand becomes more coarsely grained gravelly, and dense with depth. This soil type was observed to the total depths of the test boring, ranging from 21 to 26 feet. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 8 to 14 feet. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. Groundwater levels encountered during drilling can be deceptive, because seepage into the boring can be blocked or slowed by the auger itself. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. Where a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Arcnoishop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 3 CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. The test borings conducted for this study encountered soft, silty soils overlying medium-dense to dense sand. These dense soils were observed approximately 8 to 17 feet below the existing grade. Because of this, it is our opinion that the proposed buildings should be supported on a deep foundation embedded into the dense sand. Due to the loose upper soils and shallow groundwater, which could .cave easily during drilling, we recommend installing piers by the augercast drilling method. The augercast pier depths are anticipated to be approximately 20 to 30 feet below the existing grade. The building floor can be supported on structural fill placed atop the loose upper soils. Some slight settlement of the slab could occur due to the loose soil. Some rebar could be placed in the slab to deter cracking. If no settlement is acceptable, the slab should be supported on the piers as well. Another major consideration for this project is the potential for disturbance of surrounding buildings and property due to vibration caused by construction equipment. Regardless of the measures taken to reduce ground vibrations, there is always some risk of causing settlement in adjacent, conventionally supported buildings and on-grade elements. In order to protect against unsubstantiated damage claims from neighboring property owners or unacceptable settlement in the existing buildings on the property, we recommend the following: • Complete a thorough documentation of the condition of surrounding buildings, pavements and sidewalks prior to beginning demolition activities. • Install benchmarks on neighboring buildings to monitor them for settlement. These benchmarks should be placed and initially surveyed before building demolition starts. • Caution the demolition contractor to minimize strong impacts, such as breaking up large pieces of concrete by dropping them or striking them with the excavator bucket, wherever possible. The demolition of the single-family residences along Whitworth Avenue South may expose basement holes. We recommend backfilling the excavations with compacted structural fill to reduce the potential for settling of the backfill in the future. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would.be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type SD (Stiff Soil). The dense to GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic An.shop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27, 2001 Page 4 very dense soils that will support the deep foundation system are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction because of their dense nature. AUGERCAST CONCRETE PIERS Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions. An allowable;compressive capacity of 35 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into the dense to very dense gravelly sands. A larger capacity is possible with further embedment; please contact our office if a larger capacity is desired. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 20 to 30 feet will be required to achieve the 35-ton capacity. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structures should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a.full-length center bar. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 150 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some;lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the allowable;passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an lequivalent fluid with a density of 200 pcf. • PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Ar,,.wshop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 5 PARAMETER VALUE Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: (I) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. *For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. For increased protection;, drainage composites should be placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled entirely with free-draining soil. -- The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The performance of subsurface drainage systems will degrade over time. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where moist conditions or some seepage through the walls are not acceptable in the future. This typically includes limiting cold joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Arc= , nshop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 6 to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. With any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is important to prevent a build up of moisture that may be transmitted through concrete walls from the Surrounding soil. SLABS-ON-GRADE The building floors may be constructed as slabs-on-grade atop at least 12 inches of structural fill. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with additional select structural fill. As discussed in the GENERAL section of this report, rebar may be desirable in the slab. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed in;PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in Section 3.2.3 of the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below any on-grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture-sensitive equipment or products. ACI also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil visqueen, are typically used. A vapor retarder is defined as a';material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (psf) per hour, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. However, if no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement. Additionally, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommends that a minimum of 4 inches of compactible granular fill, such as crushed rock, should be placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection. Sand is not recommended by ACI for use as the protection layer. We recommend proof-rolling slab areas with a heavy truck or a large piece of construction equipment prior to slab construction. Any soft areas encountered during proof-rolling should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES No excavated slopes are anticipated other than for utility trenches and the potential retention vault. Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. However, vertical cuts should not be made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil at the subject site would generally be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. I I Corporation lof the Catholic An ,shop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 7 Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also I be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note)that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation, foundation, and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. Also, all permanently'exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be installed at the base of all footings where the slab or floor is below the outside grade. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retaining walls. Underslab drainage should also be provided if any basements are placed below new buildings. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non- woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 8. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Groundwater; was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. PAVEMENT AREAS The pavement section may be supported on competent, native soil or on structural fill compacted to a 95 percent I density. Because the site soils are silty and moisture sensitive, we recommend that the pavement subgrade must be in a stable, non-yielding condition at the time of paving. Granular structural fill or geotextile fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. To evaluate pavement subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof roll be completed with a loaded dump truck immediately before paving. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered,,an additional 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in the section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Arc ;hop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 8 Water from planter areas and other sources should not be allowed to infiltrate into the pavement subgrade. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. As with any pavements, some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected as the pavement ages. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. • GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL • All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is important that existing foundations be removed before site development The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfill, placed under, or close to, a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. As discussed in the GENERAL section, the on-site soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill, due to their silt content and their sensitivity to moisture. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: LOCATION OF FILL MINIMUM RELATIVE I , PLACEMENT COMPACTION Beneath footings, slabs 95% or walkwa s Filled slopes and behind 90% retainin• walls 95%for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction Is the ratio,expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1657-91 (Modified Proctor). III . Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic ArL,_ - shop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27, 2001 Page 9 LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil • samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected ,conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The scope of our work did not include an environmental assessment, but we can provide this service, if requested. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 7 Test Boring Logs Plate 8 Typical Footing Drain GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Corporation of the Catholic Art..,, shop of Seattle JN 01031 February 27,2001 Page 10 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Stevens Geotechnical Engineer CV'ERT 1441-, • 1 • 29740 GISTE4s'' s`sJONAL (EXPIRES D. RobeW - P.E. 1 Principal SES/DRW: me • II GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. i it.. IT,S. •.- • ' ''*IAN Sa,m _ .'on ± s z - :I _ 12600 st ?At!! S i ' 4 .m N r "4. .4, ■�N p r E1 11 t ' 8 g ' a I rover ST 6 w:a �I;s Irblx n \i �. 1 c swlw r f> a g QR 1 a REIYR�� .2 € 't- 1 e i i I NIA d., YEECNN]28TN,m ST �•.sj` Sw ml. c �1 'f / NATN 8 . S{ ,900 _ 0 5 H7vA,n�� 1 NE■ Till Pr°4' s1_ 1, \ $EFL,cc 0 NENEQr 1 l rril ge �_ N Tatar. ��,,� SAE1�'7N>.t�� 'RI: s 13 J�� E+>�llil oer`�'N MY t ., ,�► � f � �'NE 3� . �' J.;,..a°": /' v . sT "N7:PictS�J7 u "1 � DuvF, 16 ,ti 18 Nf ueDDl'/ 460 ®� ° q ' ,, S 21 1 1 d PA/ A Cmu1 ,%. \ 4,T CEMETERY c/u�vf.` <I SrQ Mo. •100 p-. meg.. ,gbSY .tat I�. Nt! �■ s 31W Ili sin ,, /`-R1,- �PARk 10 , ',> -" `A .rliinx900© le, ACC , / i lill sY .:•ERLD i tie Ski 'fe 11D SE STH M R METER ld�� II/ q J��';' ,7y,_ 4 .. �3'F 1 ^ CNE N L�' I ••.ham.,` 4 ,?, Ar: co rPO' ; il RVERY . p A • L 1.. ki,r . � ® 5 6,N ST ••••''•. t1f PARN 1. PAIA 'Mr.' •irii®'r ''" S f1 E1 N �..\ r QCBI � CEOR RIVER SE ••. N' > I ,. 5,� ICE'GN 52� ♦ � � �. CITE E; 9L • ar .: I ��" ENlW vnurf J ��p ARAOlD ax °a- nal. ZONE ,. I i PIM! • GRAY --10 " ■ . .0 VILLAGE PL,r/, 4vve ,. eWE��eb�N ,gl`IAPLE� OOD �S � ►_'� louver M �1'f'. I 44 'h ESE �� -711 �i4 .res, t� t sss c.,.. �16TN �9 sr _O.` ,� A^ jo„, 1 20 ;a&I •,• Off• �`f u AV 21 : - a • = i . M �Ir::t�_ �.s,. s . C.,6TMt ir►; . ' ram- :11 rP� 19virlfr.,,,,F7,1I a ,�;. . ",y Nb s sT JI .I nNNQ nni e 4Ar' ,E ', 1 _�-- i R1ay ►�C . .sLt.„s'?..„- IEfANY'Ji K"gaw k' ,.."t}'i� ''N �J PAS gn�u�&�.- y'o � 41 1-?0- .i!t \AU 4 Y rw t C I cc nar nu sr w PUGET L+�//��,I{ ai l �n ^ Y er sE tip 1[iil�S l• �'1 t...• ';—-- .. wit <, s�tiriiw 3. ii MID I N N `t 6 i 6E 16EST sr '':y SE d161 .. ••, al i b I 62N13 IE i ST :1111 T N. �..C` Iil G'i .. - I I„ El g tt ,.E 167M ST_ I� it1 a P ,H eg .,:.SN .. 271H : • �.,N"ST , u I S 27TH ST --NEio9D0 TN 11100sT 'SE 164TH .STt -r, sa..ni ry1 ,;.. : 1 : -• s. S ff TI�x CT 1 S>air-sr 1 vt"i+- 1 SE 165TM '/.ry4/1Uoo : L65111 sr_4,t Q'ki36sn1.J • ,�t- _ I (�JYY • ply WON. lure s -T1 . y9 S „L,„� • mw sr < ,1 n Si r1 l �p `S 4/st•9: 'f 44% .�"•`4 .I '1' 29TH ST / ...� + l,•_�R I.�SUNS STAIN i FJ' • €.`K h t\J 4 l 4, _ E __r 1 N '15T ST ' - < 29W -_ l ....2. ggii. V-. 1311D ST 1 r _ •rover`• S. ., 'm0 _ C E'SSE 1691H L ^SE 169TX _� `F'+\�,p'j.N��•Jt '^I v, DI...11, 28es�_. W I � 5E-1rU1N ST . 170TN <, Si y� ! a a 'I 16n 1A7 ` TH " 9 g •�.1 SE 9 1 ND ~sT �1 F.1 --..._-•T_' M �,sa s�SiS 4.171 761N ST 5 gg :C,41 5E 72ND ST i �`N I I N ift17 �"n ."�" I ? 1 '.l i to Esl L 515 loam s tgt". _sT .//"asE sx,YN, < 0220D SE "�"� -TH L21 • N (Some:Thomas Brothers King County Street Guide and Directory,1996) • VICINITY MAP __ GEOTECH South 4th St and Whitworth Ave. South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington 1_4 ___. Job No: Date: Scale: Plate: 01031 Feb.2001 Not to Scale 1 i i i i i i I I i Proposed Building Footprint Property-Line i i N�. i aai i i i i U) i i .c i i yr i i .c i 0 i o i B-2 i — i i i i I Proposed B-3 i Building Footprint i i • i i i i• Whitworth Avenue South i i i i i B-5 i i i i i i i i i i B-4 i i � 0 i i i i B-1 i i i LEGEND I ! APPROXIMATE TEST I i i Existing 0 BORING LOCATIONS • i Building i i i i i Ntti'IV SITE EXPLORATION PLAN -AIP GEOTECH South 4th St and Whitworth Ave. South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington% Job No: Date: Scale: Plate: �� ems! 01031 Feb.2001 I Not to Scale I 2 o , a'�' °� <4°°� � BORING 1 Description _ Grass over brown, sandy SILT, slightly plastic, very moist, soft 5 _ JML 6 1 ' -becomes with fine-to medium-grained SAND layers _ 1 10 — Brown, gravelly SAND, with intermitted small-grained gravel layers, 20 2 ' medium-to coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense 15 : 74 3 I SP -becomes very wet, very dense 20 -- 92 4 -becomes larger gravel content, intermitted with silt ' layers Y, gravelly, SAND * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feet during drilling on February 6, 2001. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 9 feet during drilling. 25 — 30 — 35 — 40— BORING LOG ` GEOTECH South 4th St. & Whitworth Ave. South .4 CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington J JoON031 IDFeb.2001 ILc99SES IP/ate:3 I J �� 5 oow BORING 2 O (cep �tio S),y" 5 Description FILL Asphalt over light-brown, sandy FILL, damp, loose — s . Gray-brown, sandy SILT, nonplastic, very moist, soft 5 — ' 5 1 SM • ML 10 — 4 2 ' -becomes gray, sandy SILT/silty SAND layers, slightly plastic, very moist, soft/very loose 15 — 14 3 i• 7 ' ;• ,! Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, wet, medium-dense 'I ' i -layer of cobbles _ lil ' � li • — FS—M— I 20 — '75 4 I ! � -becomes fine-to medium-grained, with tace of gravel, very dense Gray, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, wet, very dense SP 25 — 53 51 * Test boring was terminated at 26 feet during drilling on February 6, 2001. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 9 feet during drilling. 30 — 35 — 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH South 4th St. & Whitworth Ave. South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 01031 Feb. 2001 SES 4 BORING 3 o o ��`�aaro�ev�o�Q< ��ti� Gg • , ° 5 Description Asphalt over light-brown, sandy FILL, medium-grained, damp,,loose _ FILL 5 15 1 ' • Gray, silty SAND/sandy SILT, fine-grained to silt in layers, very moist, very soft/very loose 10 — 2 2 ' _ SM ML == ' ! Hrli ; Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, moist, very loose . 1111 ' ' I ! iil Iil ! 1CII 20 — 41 4 ' I Simi -becomes medium-dense to dense, wood debris encountered i I ! ' i ! 25 — 83 5 I sP ] Gray/brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, with fine sand \layers, wet, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 26.5 feet during drilling on February 6, 2001. 30 — * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 18 feet during drilling. 35 — 40— BORING LOG .0 GEOTECH South 4th St. & Whitworth Ave. South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington ��- Job No: JDate: ILoggtcEl S y: P/ate: 5I01031 Feb. 2001I I BORING 4 ti m (saroti v Safi `�G Description Brown, clayey SILT, non-plastic, moist, soft/loose IML 5 3 1 ' Brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, dense 10 — 47 2 ': 40 15SP 3 ' -becomes with fine-grained layers, very moist 20 65 4 ' -becomes very dense * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feet during drilling on February 6, 2001. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 14 feet during drilling. 25 30 — 35 — 40 — BORING LOG .._ GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,`INC. South 4th St. & Whitworth Ave. South Renton, Washington jJob 0103No: Fe(Dateb:2001 ILo99SES y: 'Plate:1 . I 6 ' I ' BORING 5 wool- ,95 ga 4 Description • Grass over brown, slightly sandy SILT, non-plastic, moist, soft SM 5 _ ML 2 1 -becomes gray with brown mottling, sandy,SILT, with organics, moist, _ , soft/loose Gray, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, very wet, dense to 10 — 61 2 ' very dense 15 — 49 3 '1SP 20 — 83 4 ' * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feet during drilling on February 6, 2001. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during drilling. 25 — 30 — 35 40 — BORING LOG GEOTECH South 4th St. & Whitworth Ave. South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: gged b Plate: 01031 Feb. 2001 JL0Y: SES J 7 • Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Tightline Roof Drain '` . ` (Do not connect to footing drain) Backfill(SeI. e text for requirements) ® ,tc,- - %' ji +nri � b. Vapor Retarder a4y.,: a Nonwoven Geotextile v, :^„. Filter ` or Barrier Fabric ,,,,,,,Let. r3ryF' f, :.,,f SLAB :si•;,. . 0 0 0 • _ �c�" tip.„ vovovo°ovovo ca• ,y4 r `pf :�ty_O A..'D •A.�".p••A•.0'p••A.�" p•• •'°• °O 1 Q /"1 -A�:ft �`• � \.iL'"i1,:', :u" . •a'.' c. •o. ,v• •A..O'.p.'A �•O,•A 0 0 0 0 0 �f..;iiA;,1',t• .' •-q ''g •o Oo�o C o 0 o c. o. •v O• o0 O•�,° ° �� • 2•#:�y a,r_,��%7'�iiL»-:s;'�.;i,a�,;.,- �$•js o' �� °e��°�o ��JJ 0 0�� OC a°CO 0 ovo �.vOv ' S, .:Y:• •ti::"', :.,;,,:,.,:e .., dr o•."b.- •o.00.o °o.°p�o°•oo0 o•o,. . 0 oac- O.O • vQvQv t�. , 7o w ;; nt,�4 "r^ i •!`• -- �'c.�•? •�'r,o •o b .° I 6" min. 111Ln:•.0,60,°,,,1 f}�—qbf�•>rr1 s. [r.�. ssyir�'ri `.rg =1� -0 oll— Free-Draining Gravel 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (if appropriate) (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) NOTES: (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage and waterproofing considerations' FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL GEOTECH South 4th St and Whitworth Ave. South ,.4140 CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington iN o. TO: Date: ca e: 01031 Feb.2001 Not to Scale NMI CGeolecho•ant Io1orrnaffooIm orpEng. About ernY our Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe- refrigerated warehouse, cific needs of their clients.A geotechnical engineering study con • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or ducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construc weight of the proposed structure, tion contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geot • composition of the design team, or echnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi— neering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report of project changes—even minor ones—and request an without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre- assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot pared it. And no one—not even you—should apply the report for accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. because their reports do not consider developments of which Read the full report they were not informed. Serious problems have occurred because those relying y g on a Subsurface Conditions Can Change geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-spe- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- cific factors when establishing the scope of a study.Typical factors tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- include:the client's goals, objectives, and risk management pref- ing the report to determine if it is still reliable.A minor amount erences;the general nature of the structure involved,its size,and of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. configuration;the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, Most Geotechnical Findings Are parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical Professional Opinions engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates other- Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those wise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are • not prepared for you, taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data • not prepared for your project, and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion • not prepared for the specific site explored, or about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub- • completed before important project changes were made. surface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—from Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existin those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- geotechnical engineering report include those that affecg neer who developed your report to provide construction obser- • the function of the proposed structure, as when cation is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- ciated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the - geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because the specific types of information they need or prefer;A prebid geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have suffi- , and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recom- dent time to perform additional study.Only then might you be in mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who a position to give contractors the best information available to you,while requiring them to at least share some of the financial developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than To Misinterpretation other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has Other design team members'misinterpretation of geotechnical Lower ments, isappoint- claims, and disputes.stic s�To help reduce such risks,ns that have l to d ge t engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with echnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory appropriate members of the design team after submitting the many lons in of theseheir reports.provisions indicate mes wherebeled geotechni geotns", echnical report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to reviewpe ze rti- elements of the design team's plans and specifications. their sown p esponsibSi test anddrisks.tRead these others provisioins Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by respond fully and frankly. providing construction observation. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs , Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to basedal ta upon their rrorsinterpretationromissions, the logs d logs f cludedd ainry perform a geotechnical a engineering report does not usually relate anyy. For that ,geoenvironmen- data. To prevent errors or orris , geousioniin architectural urlreporthe should drawings.Only wn for tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g.,photo- likelihood of encountering underground storage tanksboruegu- inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. environmen have graphic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize lateled tto ontaminants.numerous project fai uaes�If you havetnot yet obtained that separating logs from the repo,`can elevate risk. your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an Give Contractors a Complete environmental report prepared for someone else. Report and Guidance - Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer for can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi- tions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation.To help Additional Assistance prevent costly problems,give contractors the complete geotech- Membership in ASFE exoses let- array of risk management techniquescthat can be of genuine ben- , hnical engineers to a wide nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written ter of transmittal.In that letter,advise contractors that the report efit for everyone involved with a construction project.Confer with was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the your ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. ASFE 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring,MD 20910 Telephone:301-565-2733 Facsimile:301-589-2017 email:info@asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 2000 by ASFE,Inc.Unless ASFE grants written permission to do so,duplication of this document by any means whatsoever is expressly prohibited. Re-use of the wording in this document,In whole or in part,also is expressly of review oPschly i'olae ,and may research,be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes UGER1000.10M DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • MAC® 0 ` 471'0E Ni RECEWED Sep 22 • MEMORANDUM& ,,��, ?0D0 DATE: or— 2_(—O0 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 5L. Ahtleicwi S LOCATION: T3h3f1 S 3 4 5 4 4 do P/lS ,1_ • . PREAPP NO. DO — /01 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for // 700,414 , Thursday, 5" , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE.CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to 51-C.v2J at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. Vni for04 Codes carr-criR1 ( 1 7 4 _ Cea /ech ✓ i a( A „aro r' f -r r�cc , C. .EY,Qt_J2--- H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 Oti�Y G�i ♦ CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU _yr MEMORANDUM DATE: September 25, 2000 TO: Steve Taylor, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsh SUBJECT: St. Anthony's Parish Project, S 3 , 4th, Morris & Shattuck Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4500 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. This is based on Type V N construction. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$22,800.00 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20'in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. Bollards are not allowed in required Fire Lanes. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Steve Taylor From: Kayren K.Kittrick Date: September 27, 2000 Subject: St.Anthony's PreApplication Review 00-107 NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner,Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There are existing 4-inch, 6-inch and 12-inch diameter water lines in the vicinity. Whitworth Avenue S has an existing 4-inch diameter water line. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is modeled from 1360 gpm to 6500 gpm with a static pressure of 74 psi. 2. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 3. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone. The proposed project is outside either Aquifer Protection Zone . 4. The Water System Development Charge (SDC) would be prepared at a rate of$0.113 per square foot of the total property with a redevelopment credit applied for current use. SANITARY SEWER 1. There are existing new 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer lines in the alleyways. 2. The,Sanitary Sewer SDC is triggered and will be assessed at a rate of$0.078 per square foot of gross site area with redevelopment credits applied for current use. SURFACE WATER 1. A level one drainage study is required per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces subject to vehicular access is required. 2. The'Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying_the new square footage by$0.129. St.Anthony's PreApplication Review 00-107 09/27/00 Page 2 • TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of$75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed against any new buildings. A traffic study may be required for those major intersections impacted by this proposal. 2. Full street improvements including,but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb &gutter, street signs and street lights are required where not already existing. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 4. In the case of a street vacation,easements for all existing utilities shall be required. PLAN REVIEW 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards which are attached for reference. Also attached for general information are a fee reference sheet and the King County Storm Water standards as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. A construction permit and water meter applications will be required.When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. CC: Neil Watts • II _ l CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: September 28,2000 TO: Steve Taylor FROM: ; Owen Dennison(#6576 SUBJECT: St.Anthony's Preapplication(00-107) The site is designated Center Downtown in the Comprehensive Plan. The issues raised by this proposal primarily concern the vacation of Whitworth Avenue. Land Use Element Policy LU-71 states, "New streets should be designed to provide convenient access and an choice of routes between homes and parks, schools, shopping, and other community destinations". Although the policy refers to new roadways,the intent is to create and preserve an efficient network of pedestrian and vehicular routes. The proposal would be contrary to the intent of the policy by increasing the distance between certain origins and destinations. Downtown Element Objective DT-E states, "Improve the City's pedestrian and bicycle network to improve access to and circulation within the downtown". Pedestrian circulation would be most affected by the proposed vacation. We are certainly sympathetic to the issue of safety for students. As noted in Land Use Element Policy LU-255, "Safe pedestrian access to schools should be promoted (e.g. through pedestrian linkages, safety features) through the design of new subdivisions and roadway improvements". However, it would seem that there may be other safety improvements available without vacating the street. Finally,there is no public benefit identified to offset the loss of convenience. cc: Betty Nokes II II \\CENTRALlSYSMEPTS\EconomicDevelopmenA.STRATPLN\PLANNING\PREAPP\CD\StAnthonys.doc\od • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 5, 2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-107 FROM: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner - SUBJECT: St.Anthony's Master Plan General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referericed development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55,plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review,at no charge in the office of the City Clerk, on the 6ch floor and at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The subject master plan site consists of approximately 36 underlying parcels,most of which are located between South 3rd and 4th Streets and between Shattuck and Morris Avenues South. The site contains Saint Anthony Catholic Church, a parochial school serving grades K-8, an administrative building,church rectory, social hall/gymnasium, portable classrooms, and various single-family homes and garages owned by the Parish and rented out. + The master plan envisions vacating approximately 280-feet of Whitworth Avenue north of South i,4th Street and the alley adjacent to the church. The plan is composed of at least four phases;with Phase I being the construction of a new gymnasium/social hall partially located on the vacated Whitworth Avenue right-of-way. Phase II would include construction of new t' 1 ` school facilities adjacent to the gymnasium. Phase III would expand the church and Phase IV k) - might include the renovation or replacement of the existing school building. Vacation: The entire master plan is based on the premise of vacating Whitworth Avenue, therefore the applicant must show how the public would benefit from the vacation. Following are several concerns that must be addressed. • Whitworth Avenue is designated as a Collector street and part of the downtown grid system. Removing it would disrupt both vehicle and pedestrian circulation. How would these impacts be addressed? Pre-App 00-107.doc\ i • ♦1 Would S 4ch Street be impacted by dropping off and picking up students if Whitworth were closed. ♦ How would the on-street parking that is currently available for properties abutting the proposed vacation and for businesses north of the street vacation be replaced? • There are concerns regarding the disruption of access and circulation needs of the properties located just north of the proposed street vacation and how to address such needs, since it may be difficult to provide a turn-around in the portion of Whitworth remaining after the vacation. Does your plan allow for through access from Whitworth to Morris Avenues? •; There are utilities in both the street and alley that must be accounted for either by easement or relocation. You cannot place a building within an easement. Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD)on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the CD zone is to provide a mixed use commercial center serving a regional market as!well as adjacent residences. In addition,the subject site is located within the Urban . Center De,Isign Overlay District. Existing schools are a primary use within the CD zone. They may'be expanded up to 10%subject to administrative site plan approval. Expansions • greater than 10%require Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval. Any expansion of the church is subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps,the site is located in a Seismic Hazard Area. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. A geotechnical analysis for the site is required. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CD zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Design—The site is subject to the Urban Center Overlay District regulations. These standards and guidelines affect architectural issues including siting, design,modulation, common open space, access and parking. Several standards such as building orientation, entrance location, bulk&scale,parking and access are directly applicable to this project and should be considered,thoroughly before a detailed design is finalized. If need be,the applicant may request a modification from these standards pursuant to RMC section 4-9-100.D. Lot Cover age—Maximum building coverage for parcels located outside of the Downtown Core Area is 65%. Setbacks/Landscaping—A minimum 15-foot and a maximum 25-foot front yard setback applies to all buildings over 25-feet in height. There are no rear or side yard setbacks required in the CD one. In addition, a 10-foot landscape strip is required along streets. Height—The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The proposed elevations appear to be in compliance with this code requirement. Screening—', Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical!equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to AMC section 4-4-090.C.7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Pre-App 00-107.doc\ Parking—The following parking requirements are applicable to the project. • Gymnasium/Social Hall: 1-parking space for each 4 fixed seats or each 100-sf of floor area • School: . 1-parking space for each employee. In addition, if buses for the transportation of students are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space shall be 11 provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. I• Church: 1-parking space for each 5 additional seats provided by the new construction. Based on the square feet of the proposed project, a parking modification will be need. The parking area will also need to comply with the design regulations of the Urban Center Overlay District. Permit Requirements: The first step in gaining approval for the proposed master plan is proceeding with the vacation request of Whitworth Avenue and the alley between Whitworth and Morris Avenues. If the request is successful,Phase I of the proposal would require review of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit, as well as Environmental(SEPA) Review. Both reviews would be conducted concurrently in an estimated time frame of 8 to 12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. If any appeals are filed,the timeframe may be extended for an additional 4 to 6 weeks. The application fee would be$2,500.00,plus$0.33 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate demolition, construction,building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the reviewiof the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees,the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Redevelopment credits for the existing structure would be applied. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on the square feet of the facility. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Conditional Use Criteria: In order to obtain approval of a conditional use,the proposal must satisfy specific criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed use must be deemed consistent with other existing and potential uses within the general area of the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit based on the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria(RMC section 4-9-030G): • Comprehensive Plan • Community Need • Effect on Adjacent Properties,including lot coverage, yards and height Pre-App 00-107.doc\ • Compatibility . • • Parking • Traffic • Noise, Glare • Landscaping • Accessory Uses • Conversion • Public Improvements A staff recommendation of approval for the conditional use,would depend on whether adequate measures are taken to reduce impacts to the adjacent properties and residences. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre-App 00-107.doc\ HrK-11-e1311 '1 r.iJ L.1 I T ur IctN I UN ties 4.)) r JUU r.ui,u7 n (�1 M1 • ti IE • L I MAY 2 4 2001 'L`J MEMORANDUM DATE: S7a D TO: Construction Services, Fire Pretiention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: S-1-. AN 4-I.,aN y iA2i�, ReJt LOCATION:I La 15 W1131.4o 14vt 5, PREAPP NO. C`31 - 0 5.5 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 1 I D J ,Thursday, ' c ) , in one of the e'floor conference rooms(new City Hall). If this Meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM,the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 1;1:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the • applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level"review at this time. Note only major Issues that must be resolved priorto formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please:cut w tten:comments to : . 0e/N) at least-two(2)days before the meeting. Thankyou. ett rig e4/5 Po t-ir Fax Note 7671 Dal•5/// got,t,G7 To AnAey Fmm Co/Deot. Co. /tl Ptlono r Phone _Fax r oD05. .36) Fax H:1Division.slDevclop.set\Dev do P1aa.ingTemplateWreapp2 Revised 9/00 APR-11-2002 17:lb L 1 i Y ur KtN I UN ti`tY • • �; CITY OF RENTON . =' • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 24, 2001 TO: i Steven Taylor, Senior Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsh SUBJECT: St. Anthony Parish Rectory, 215 hitman Av. S Fire Department Comments: 1, Existing hydrants are adequate for new addition. They may need to be retrofit with the Stortz quick connect fitting if they don't have one now. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I J FirR-11-Gu i 1(•lb L l I T Ur KCN I UN 9Gb 4.110 (31a10 K.133/177 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY REVIEW TO: Steve Taylor FROM: Jan Illian x7216 DATE: June 12,2001 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS PREAPP NO.01-055 ST. ANTHONY'S RECTORY 215-WHITORTH AVE S. NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The followingI comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant The applicant is cautioned that Information contained In this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 4-inch water main in Whitworth Ave S. 2. Available fire flow is 1,000 gpm. The nearest hydrant is within 300 feet of the structure. 3. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. Static pressure in the area is approximately 70 psi. 4. No additional water system development charges are owed. 5. The existing single-family residence is currently connected to water by a%inch water meter. 6. Due to the additional plumbing fixtures being added to the new addition, applicant may be required Ito upsize the existing % -inch domestic water meter. A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Whitworth Ave S. 2. The existing single-family residence is currently connected to sewer by-a 4-inch side sewer. This side Isewer is mostly likely very old concrete connection. Applicant may want to consider replacing the existing side sewer. 3. No additional sewer system development charges are owed. HrK-11-eutie 11'f;lb l.1 I T UI- KtN I UN 43 '(ZOO r.F74'F J St.Anthony's Pre 01-055 page 2 SURFACE WATER 1. There are storm facilities in Whitworth Ave S. 2. No additional surface water system development charges are owed. TRANSPORTATION 1. If the existing driveway approach changes, appliant will require a right of way permit. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. When utility plans are complete. please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. cc: Karen Kittrtck • HI- -11-0Ukid 1'r:lb U l I Y Ur KtN I UN 4eD 4J17 (.inn r.uJ,'up. • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building,/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: ! June 14,2001 TO: Pre-Application File No. 01-055 FROM: Steve Taylor, Senior Planner SUBJECT: St. Anthony Parish Rectory General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenceddevelopment proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers(e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55,plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first:floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge in the office of the City CIerk on the 7`h floor, at Development Services on the 6th floor and at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The subject site is located at 215 Whitworth Avenue South and is approximately'/,acre in size. The site contains a single family house and garage. The proposal is to construct an approximately 1,600-sf addition to accommodate three priests who will live at the facility. The addition will contain an extension of the existing kitchen,a breakfast room,and three "suites"for;the priests. Each suite will have a sitting room,bedroom,and bathroom. The existing two-car garage will be demolished and replaced with a three-car garage. Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Downtown(CD)on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the CD zone is to provide high-density residential and mixed use commercial centers serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. The site is not located in the Downtown Core Area. The CD zone does allow existing detached single family dwellings as a primary permitted use. Because the use is affiliated with a church,and considered to be an expansion of the church use,a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit is required. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps,the site is located in a Seismic Hazard Aree. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. You should assess soil conditions and detail any construction measures needed to assure building stability. Pm-App 0l-053.doc1 rlrr-11-GCMG 1 I•1 f LIII ur 1CCIY I UIV 4CJ 9JEJ f JCJC1 r.IJO'CJ7 Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CD zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Lot Coverage—The maximum building lot coverage for this project would be 75%. Density—Density provisions do not apply to a proposed addition to a single family home. Setbacks/,Landscaping—The front yard setback is already defined by the existing house and no changes arc proposed in this area. No rear or side yard setbacks are required. A minimum 10- foot landscape strip is required along the street frontage. It appears that the landscaping requirements are met by the existing improvements. Height—The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The proposed 2-story • building will be in compliance with this code requirement. Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials may be required with your submittal. Parkin¢—The parking proposed will meet the required minimum parking requirements. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require an Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit,as well as Environmental(SEPA)Review. Both reviews would be conducted concurrently in an estimated time frame of 12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. If any appeals are filed,the timeframe may be extended for an additional 4 to 6 weeks. The application fee would be$2,500.00,plus$0.34 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition to any land use permits,separate demolition,construction,building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits,but can not be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning Pte•App 01-055.doc1 APR-11-2002 I17:17 CITY OF RENTON 425 4.5U Y-500 r.UY/Lri • C/p.p 1PcQ� "Cent "ok 01 MEMORANDUM �4"Goy /0N DATE: S( O I TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: 1 Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director , SUBJECT: ' New Preliminary Application: s-I-, AN 1-1.0N y PA12;51, Qec.7� LOCATION: (J5 WNIiiwo/A Ave S , PREAPP NO. PF.„ __ C?I - _C7 5,5 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 11,0 ) ,Thursday, -Vv e. I O ' ' ) , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. I Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the ' applicant. You will not need to do a thorough"permit lever review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. • Please submit your written comments toWeni _ at least two (2)days before the meeting. Thank you. '46 ein„,z, cy.ciet",..., H;1DivisioassDevvelop.serlDev&Plan iDg\TenQlate\Preapp2 Revised 9/OO I HICK-11 1'f:1"f (.11Y UI- KtN I UN 4d 4.5e -(3100 r.nrs'F77 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: June 12,2001 TO: Ste Taylor • FROM: ennison SUBJECT: St.Anthony Parish Rectory Preapplication(01-055) The site is designated Center Downtown in the Comprehensive Plan, and is located within Renton's Urban Center. The intent of the Center Downtown designation is to create an intensively developed urban neighborhood that combines high-density residential development with retail, entertainment and employment opportunities. The CD designation is also required to absorb the majority of the residential component of the Urban Center. Land supply in the downtown is limited and generally fragmented. To achieve the City Council's vision,it is critical that parcels,such as this site,not be lost to lower intensity uses. The City has made significant investments of capital and resources,in recent years, to increase the density and intensity of development in the downtown core. Effectively removing this third of an acre from the potential pool of redevelopable land would hinder these efforts. St.Anthony's has expressed an intent to create a unified campus in the downtown. This would seem a more appropriate location for the proposed rectory than the proposed site. The proponents are encouraged to reconsider the current site in favor of a location within the expanded campus. cc; Mayor Tanner lacy Covington Sue Canton H:IECON DEY1EcanomieDevelopmenAS RATPLMPt.AMVINGIPREAPPtCD Rectory.docbd , 46eD, .4.-11D r. OU r•r-P-2,Li CITY OF RENTON APR-11-2002 ,17:17 ',..•..,,.- i ,/ . ':.. . ."•' • .,• , • •••••• A. .L. 4..•: . F 9:°ril . , • / .: ..• i ?.:: / , • P.-p i _ , •.,,,,ir . /, -,? ' -4- --- Z •; I I .4. , ,....,..4444, iii• ...4 • . 11 - . 1, •. , I! ili; ap Arlie. Nor •_._ siremprli . • I: . , • . . • . ,,,, . 1, ., ..„ II 1 i-•• , ,..., in.& -a. '....•.:YR L._ 1111 ak 1 i i I, 1 , , r. a- 1 .... ••••- • an, • . lt, ... ilk .,,..E.„--r,,• I / 4, • t. • I _ ••ii, , . os";• , —1 ! 1 ,,.., ... 1 • , illvi• i . • ., , •••••• ' •or. / -- . . .• ., I / I li - ___. .. • , . - '• i klu :a. 1 fr. 40 ll • an .---,-- fry / i •fs b i . 1il . 0 " • . . •. -.4 ilic ... 0 itl tilhacfmmiwitt,mw&Amripv..:siiiimmimmil!tipv, lypImp,„ un 3! 1 po ,,._,,Iiimilm . -,:riglizaimidaamgarsirit.:' P.' r4A-adaliallipt . r .d. , „ ..+ — . .Z) r.. .. , :/ 0 ' • _ 4 . _ I • . it.) .... , 1 C '"" / 4 4 ) f '''''.`---1--""* V• . -• _____ I_..., ....•.-----!. / /• ..1 .• rp . 12 11 - ^ 1 . j ., , / /r.; • I , _ , ic. ,._ . . , , ... --il V:, 7' ' 1 ( /i , i . .44/ .. / ; i . n 12 / n / .......77...... _. ari l - &I. / .. ,1 ar, 1 I _ i tit ... - . ,.. • . 1 ---.1.0....-- •= . i . ,.„„ ::: - .,. :. ..-„-,i........!,-*., ,,,.:.-.::...........f?: i., •• :. _. -?:E-,,,..c,. . c"i-Aiiiiiiik'" . • ,._ _,,A - - • ,...," _ ..______ ..Ts.,:?Aiii .„-.:.Vt.. - • 6 ... . • — .• it..;i-t•:AI•ii li . , '. . . . ' I.' . '. .;!7,"I/? • • nig ir •-•••• r'-, / . .Y.4 . . . .,.. _ , . ._. . .rb v.,.1 /r 4. • ...1 to 0;. • lain-a —.... .7 - 0 f P . :-'0,1/1 ..! . I..-.C.) ••............. .,,t_.. .„.. .. • 0 4 . .i .;:,;!•••••- : : OA • i 401: - • '. -• ,.. - t•-) .. .. ._,'.,7 4:1 ,-,or• . • ... . . ,0 qi,,,,,,,•.; ,...• . • •- TOTAL P.09 [ . ! STREET VACATION PETITION VAC 00-003 WHITWORTH AVENUE S NORTH OF S 4TH STREET ST. ANTHONY PARISH AND SCHOOL PETITIONERS CITY OF RENTON STREET VACATION PETITION FILE#VAC-00-003 PETITIONER S ST. ANTHONY PARISH AND SCHOOL SUBJECT: STREET VACATION PETITION: WHITWORTH AVE S NORTH OF S 4TH STREET AND SOUTH 160 FEET OF ALLEY THROUGH THE BLOCK EAST OF WHITWORTH • AND NORTH OF S 4TH STREET IN PARTIAL EXCHANGE FOR DEDICATION WIDENING THE ALLEY SOUTH OF S 3RD STREET BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND SHATTUCK AVE S ISSUE: The petitioner(requests vacation of a portion of Whitworth Ave S and the alley east of Whitworth right-of- way in partial exchange for a four-foot widening of the east-west alley between Whitworth and Shattuck Ave. S. as shown on the accompanying map exhibit. The stated purpose of the request is to enable redevelopment of St. Anthony's church and school into an integrated campus in phases over the next 20 years. The first phase includes construction of a new gymnasium and a new social hall straddling the existing Whitworth Ave.right of way. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council deny the requested street vacations of Whitworth Ave. S.and the alley vacation exchange portion of the request. BACKGROUND: The petition for roadway vacation was received June 29, 2000, from St. Anthony Parish and School. They represent 100°A of the frontage along the right-of-way under this petition. The portion of right-of-way included in this petition was dedicated in the plat of Smither's Fourth and Fifth Additions, a 60-foot wide road right-of-way and, as such,no City funds were spent in the acquisition of this right of way. The City of Renton has a 4-inch water main,curbs,gutters, and paving along the entire length of this property. The alley portion is 16 feet wide, was similarly dedicated at no cost, and a sewer main occupies the entire length of this segment of alley. The petitioner is in the process of planning redevelopment of their property to accommodate the current use of their church'and school facilities, improve safety for their students who currently walk from the school to the gymnasium]located south of S 4th Street on the east side of Morris Avenue S, provide for more efficient transportation to, from and in the immediate vicinity of their campus, and to create additional parking areas to serve the campus, local residents and businesses. In this neighborhood, east-west traffic uses S 2nd Street westbound, S 3rd Street eastbound,and S 4th Street in both directions. The north-south roads are all designated as arterials, although traffic can only cross the railroad right of way to the south on Rainier Avenue S, Shattuck Avenue S underpass and Burnett Avenue S. Whitworth, Morris and Smithers Avenues S provide for utility service, police and fire service access, local access and pedestrian uses. page 2 The petitioner has had several meetings with City Staff, including a Pre-application Conference and two meetings with the Board of Public Works to identify concerns, explain the scope of their project and resolve • major issues. The petitioner reports complete support for the project from neighboring property owners at a series of public forums. In order to determine if this petition meets the requirements in City Code 9-14-3C: The City Council shall take testimony at the public hearing to determine whether the vacation is in the public interest, whether the property is not required for overall circulation of traffic within the City,and that the requested vacation is not detrimental to the public health,safety and general welfare: A traffic study has been conducted by Transportation Planning&Engineering,Inc.and provided to the City. The report identified "Benefits", "Disadvantages" and "Conclusions and Recommendations" which are excerpted from the report and attached to this memorandum. The study documents that the development plan would reduce congestion at two major intersections during peak traffic periods,reduce vehicle queuing on public streets adjacent to petitioner's 'campus during peak traffic times, provide increased safety for pedestrians including St. Anthony students and modestly lower the level of service during peak traffic periods at the intersection of S 4th Street and Morris Ave S. Petitioner has offered to exchange additional right of way to expand the existing east-west alley between Shattuck and Whitworth south of S 3rd Street from 20 to 24 feet and provide improvements to accommodate two lanes of traffic, one in each direction. This offer was in response to City staff request in order to enhance traffic circulation in the vicinity. Current City Code 9-14-5B provides: The City shall receive compensation in accordance with RCW 35.79.030,which amount for the purpose of this Chapter is to be determined by an appraisal;provided, that the City Council shall have authority, upon recommendation of the administration, to accept real property or a property right in lieu of a part or all of the cash compensation that would be paid. When the value of the property or property right is less than the cash compensation required for the alley or street right-of-way to be vacated, the petitioner shall pay the difference to the City. When the value of the property or property right exceeds the value of the alley or street right-of:- way to be vacated,the City shall pay the difference to the petitioner. Therefore, if the Renton City Council approves all or any part of the petition following the public hearing, the petitioner will hire an appraisal to determine the value of the right-of-way being vacated and the value of the additional right of way for the alley. Upon receipt and review of the appraisal determinations, the City Council will be informed and will be asked to accept the appraisal and set the amount of the compensation in this matter. RESEARCH/SURVEY: The current proposed street vacation request was circulated to City departments and outside agencies for comments. The following is a summary of responses received from all concerned parties: No objection to the proposed street vacation: Community Services/Parks Police Department AT&T Qwest,formerly US WEST Communications page 3 Objections to the request and/or conflicts,which must be addressed: • The Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department does not perceive a public benefit relative to the public cost in convenient circulation that would be lost to the proposed vacation of the portion of Whitworth Avenue. There is no objection to the alley portion of the request. • Transportation withdrew their previous statement of concerns, which concerns have been addressed and answered by the traffic study report. They comment also that they would like to see a pedestrian corridor provided through the site in the approximate current location of Whitworth Avenue if this street is vacated. • Fire Prevention will support the vacation when a firm timetable is set for demolition of the four existing residences.along the portion of Whitworth under the petition. • Waste Water Utility requests that a utility easement be retained over the entire alley right-of-way if �(c vacated and note that upon redevelopment, the easement should be amended to cover relocation of the utility facilities. • Water Utility requests that a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way if vacated to provide for maintenance of the existing water main, as well as allowing existing water meters to be accessed and read, and note that upon redevelopment, the easement should be amended to cover relocation of the utility facilities. • Surface Water Utility comments that although there are no existing underground surface water conveyance systems in place, the existing curb and gutter provide conveyance of surface water to collection points protecting the surrounding properties from flooding, and any future development must provide for adequate conveyance of surface water before the current curb and gutter system is removed. In their second review, they include the comment that expansion of the east-west alley will require configuration to cure existing drainage concerns. • Maintenance Division comments that the alley north of the project will require paving and drainage to meet street standards, and, the existing drainage in Whitworth Ave S flows south along existing curbs and gutters and will need to be addressed by the development. CONCLUSION: Since the Whitworth Ave. S. right-of-way is an improved arterial and is a part of the City Street Grid system, the Administration's position is in opposition to the requested street vacation. This recommendation to deny the request to vacate a portion of Whitworth Ave. S. is based upon an accumulation of impacts contrary to the public interest: • The vacation will reduce the transportation grid in a neighborhood already provided with limited access options due to the railroad tracks. This will limit and negatively impact the City's ability to plan and provide transportation infrastructure to accommodate growth and changing transportation needs in this neighborhood. • Emergency,access will be impeded. • A utility corridor will be lost to current and future uses. • The alley provides public storm water runoff conveyance needed to prevent neighboring properties from flooding. For these reasons,the street vacation request does not appear to be in the public interest and should be denied. The alley-exchange portion of the request should be denied for similar reasons. 1 I 1 I I I i , 1 , ! ' I i I _J I I I I S 3rd Street --r I I I -11-- I I . , Alley Dedi ati n --------_L__.__i ,--- . I___________---1 ca I 1 I r Street Va o—n- a i -----1 = ! a: ' .---i 6C ...v 0 I I = I, 4.0 4-, 1 . co 11 I 1 ____. 1 / S 4th Street • . _____, , , 1 , —1 I-- ---- •-•-i . 1 ! 1 • ! : 1 -"i 1 ,. ------ ---.1 ca , 1 i L---- • - •--- -I 1 i 1___________ _.: [__ . . _ . ....d • ___ ____ __ .. E__. - - 1 • 1 icx I I , , ! • : t: I 1 . . • S 1-'''''- - . - . it- I : 1 . • •i• 1 Y 0 Street Vacation VAC00-003 , cir•._ ...6 Tom Boyns,Technical Services ..17LK 03/13/2001 St. Anthony Church 1 •k4-,,,,.c?' and School EXHIBIT A Street Vacation VAC 00-003 Legal Description Beginning ,at the northeast corner of Lot 22,Block 1, Smither's Fifth Addition,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,page 33,records of King County, Washington, thence southerly along the east line of Lots 16 through 22, of said Block 1, and along the. intersection corner rounding,to an intersection with the south line of said Lot 16; Thence easterly across Whitworth Avenue S to the westernmost point of the south line of Lot 15 of Block 1, Smither's Fourth Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page I19,records of King County,Washington; Thence northerly along the intersection corner rounding and along the west line of Lots 9 through 15 of said Block 1 to the northwest corner of said Lot 9; Thence westerly to the Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH that portion of the alley running north and south through said Block 1, Smither's Fourth Addition south of a line beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 12 of said Block 1 and ending at the northwest corner of Lot 19 of said Block 1. Contains an area of 19,360 square feet,more or less. IN PARTIAL EXCHANGE FOR the north 4 feet of Lots 7 and 24 in said Block 1, Smither's Fifth Addition; TOGETHER WITH the north 4 feet of the vacated alley adjoining said Lots 7 and 24,vacated by Ordinance No. 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. Contains an area of 1,024 square feet,more or less. All situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County, Washington. VAC00-003 LegaVtgb3/13/01 • ` PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY • OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia.Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.com) • Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtis@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Georgean Moore (georgeanmoore@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Debby Bigelow (debbybigelow@pnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. " (206)343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Catholic, Archbishop Property & Construction 910 Marion Street Title Order No. 473062 . Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: Paula Marter Your Ref. : Renton Property LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Effective Date: April 3, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. Liability: $5,000.00 Charge: $ 500.00 Tax: $ 44.00 1. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this certificate is fee simple. 2. The estate or interest referred to herein, according to the public records, is at Date of' Certificate vested in: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE, a corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington 3. The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, pages 2 through 5, inclusive, attached. MiliNI�LOPMEI�IT C) pNfV19VG N OF R ON QED Order No. 473062 LIMITEDIIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL 1: Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 2: The portion of Lot 8, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence north 89°47' east 120.00 feet; Thence south 00°13 ' east 20.00 feet; Thence south 65°33 '20" west 21.93 feet; Thence south 89°47' west 100.00 feet; Thence north 00°13' west 29.00 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 3: Lots 8 and 9, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 8, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence running east along the northerly boundary thereof to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; Thence south 00°13 ' east 20 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 8; Thence south 65°33 '20" west 21.93 feet; Thence south 89°47' west 100 feet to the westerly boundary of said Lot 8; Thence northerly along the westerly boundary of said Lot 8 to the point of beginning of this exception. (continued) 1 Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 3 PARCEL 4: Lot 9, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 5: Lot 10, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 6: Lot 11, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 7: Lot 12, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 8: Lot 13 and the north half of the north 20 feet of Lot 14, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 9: The south 30 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions of Lots 15 and 16, conveyed to the City of Renton, for roads, by deeds recorded under King County Recording Numbers 7305180516 and 7305180517. (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 4 PARCEL 10: Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33 in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 15 conveyed to the City of Renton, for road, by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 7305180518; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 11: Lots 16 and the south half of Lot 17, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 16 conveyed to the City of Renton, for road, by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 7305180515; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 12: The north half of Lot 17 and all of Lot 18, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 13: Lots 19 and 20, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. (continued) . Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 5 PARCEL 14: Lots. 21 and 22, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 15: Lot 23, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached , by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 16: Lot 24, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page, 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. END OF SCHEDULE A Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 1 A. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not, shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. B. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. This report is restricted to the use of the addressee, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. The liability of the Company is limited to $5,000.00. 0EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin PURPOSE: Electric transmission system AREA'AFFECTED: Parcel 14 RECORDED: July 30, 1918 - RECORDING NUMBER: 1232956 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, �' BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin PURPOSE: Electric transmission system AREA,AFFECTED: Parcel 15 RECORDED: July 30, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 1232957 (-1 mil4. ' EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin PURPOSE: Electric transmission system AREA AFFECTED: Parcel 16 RECORDED: , September 3, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 1241691 (continued) • J Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 (DEASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT :NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin PURPOSE: Electric transmission system AREA AFFECTED: Parcel 14 RECORDED: November 4, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 125317 6. ) EASE.._, MENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a corporation of the State of Wisconsin PURPOSE: Electric transmission system AREA AFFECTED: Parcel 13 RECORDED: November 4, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 1258321 7.) EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: PURPOSE: Water line AREA AFFECTED: Parcel 2 RECORDED: June 11, 1946 RECORDING NUMBER: 3577661 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN,- INCLUDING, Lj BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREAIAFFECTED: Parcel 11 RECORDED: August 26, 1994 RECORDING NUMBER: 9408260776 (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 4 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: The City of Renton PURPOSE: Constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines AREA'AFFECTED: Parcel 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 RECORDED: January 17, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 200010117001672 10. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: Eduron W. Smithers and Ada Thorne DATED: August 10, 1910 RECORDED: August 30, 1910 RECORDING NUMBER: 702271 AFFECTS: Parcel 14 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Coal 'and minerals NOTE: No examination has been made to determine the present record owner of the above minerals, or mineral lands and appurtenant rights thereto, or to determine matters which may affect the lands or rights so reserved. 11. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0150-03 AFFECTS: Parcel 1 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 5 12. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0150-03 AFFECTS: Parcel 1 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 13. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0181-06 AFFECTS: Parcel 2 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 14. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR:, 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0181-06 AFFECTS: Parcel 2 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 (continued) . Order No. 473062 _ LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 6 15. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0185-02 AFFECTS: Parcel 3 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 16. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783980-0185-02 AFFECTS: Parcel 3 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 17. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0050-01 LEVY CODE: 2110 AFFECTS: Parcel 4 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $91,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,482.05 $0.00 $1,482.05 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 (continued) . Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 7 18. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0055-06 LEVY CODE: 2110 AFFECTS: Parcel 5 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $91,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,482.05 $0.00 $1,482.05 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 19. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0060-09 AFFECTS: Parcel 6 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 20. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0060-09 AFFECTS: Parcel 6 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 (continued) Order No. 4.73062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 8 21. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0065-04 LEVY CODE: 2110 AFFECTS: Parcel 7 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $ 38,000.00 Improvements: $131,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,941.61 $0.00 $1,941.61 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 22. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0070-07 AFFECTS: Parcel 8 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 23. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0070-07 AFFECTS: Parcel 8 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 - $5.00 (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 9 24. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0075-02 AFFECTS: Parcel 9 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 25. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0075-02 AFFECTS: Parcel 9 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 26. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0035-01 AFFECTS: Parcel 10 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE:, PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 10 27. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0035-01 AFFECTS: Parcel 10 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 28. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0080-05 AFFECTS: Parcel 11 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 29. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0080-05 AFFECTS: Parcel 11 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 11 30. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0090-03 LEVY CODE: 2110 AFFECTS: Parcel 12 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $ 57,000.00 Improvements: $102,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,826.72 $0.00 $1,826.72 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 31. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0100-01 AFFECTS: Parcel 13 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 32. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0100-01 AFFECTS: Parcel 13 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 12 33. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0105-06 AFFECTS: Parcel 14 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. 34. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0105-06 AFFECTS: Parcel 14 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 35. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0120-07 AFFECTS: Parcel 15 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE, THE TELEPHONE NUMBER IS 206-296-5151. (continued) Order No. 473062 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 13 36. SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: '2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 764130-0120-07 AFFECTS: Parcel 15 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 37. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784130-0125-02 LEVY, CODE: 2110 AFFECTS: Parcel 16 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $ 38,000.00 Improvements: $107,000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,665.88 $0.00 $1,665.88 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 38. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. END OF SCHEDULE B Title tolthis property was examined by: Mick Foley - Any inquires should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. dh • L Zr' 0.(: olko n � ' t� ' Qrn s o 0 Mp0 g 0 ~ I �g 23, g a 44Amp ,o131 al: t 8 oyb 000 o ,W. O or 22 : 4i t 9 m .•to //. '►001'�0 22' _ : 9 o 1- 4, 00 tl►�i CO Q X izo �c d0• '�°`'2/ ` a �p� o►1x 2/. 2 =/0 . 33 1 ti a/: it . �o cMn .. 6 ~ • ape . // ~.. to so i°t0: ' // 'p1to Oil' 20= ,W = 0 vo J Z �,.,o /9: I , /a t Z" ,, /!_ ; ° /2 0. Q j 19 t •�o Q_ le CC o 0 o g o°� I�=is� CC J /d: X I /3 4* C� s 110/4 v1 . • /3 `'os4° Q ,' /e sti O J o _„°0 °oR M p°°,lgto5 ,1 1 b7: N/,4 op /7= ' /¢ Aio0 a p ni°�/70a0 . Cn f ,Q s. ua J !' �'»fta°1;b? �/S ,o 010 ,6 �20 /bir� � I : s 6 tto i- 30 3e ~..nsu.T., ,vo....::" .wsuwac.... s ru S. FOURTH (,f) ST. A I • a y0o,w d'.`,. 4 4o'4 0 S 4 / o3 I,Ir s % F�on 340o...-- o o, leti R O 0) ® • g b° A yy. 4' f 4v o �� y0 y°N 0°,/� i4� VA. 60 400 at ,,,,: /� o V11r01 /8; i?7 fT 01 og '41 G I I: Z. , INL. �pvq w gp0 �y� lOs P eRii y}i�p w 2 `Ooo • ' 1 • ,1� y`��,, r~ „�'L1.,,y.T 5�,�7� �p�'' Rj q7_ VI l ■ ,Ze 1324.13 w u =.r �-'s w0 ° 4 ,!v P O�Js $ t ��. �{�` 30 30 +10 k Or' ? °I°®/ Sit 3� ��I!� �O / its O. I � ' .I • GOG .Os— ..2., ti � t 7 + 0 I I .As ��` Order No 473062 • PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Company of Washington, Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N • WI 1 F ui 3 . 8 -00:46 _ Q As 23 : 0 8 ,�g44 0 lib"' 23: Cl) > `' 41, •X i pd ce w a . 9 °°° 0. op 22 . u; `' • 9 Om ,o°i.° 0�3 z2 _ _ o 0:. > t 1- m o 00 = • /I V 4:0 ti ,,, Z0 : . II �e 06 Q ,o°, . EO ow g 4.. /a 4 1— 22 /9: 2 ; /2 .4 Z *904/9 '4 . H 0p Ili 0 0 0 _ : /3 B �P°O ' Il � 1$: 0 : /3 I%% 0 ,o via : h 3�___1 > a ,froo°� I.L.I ,sO ,;, Q ;/$ � .Ito e°lD .�o..4 0 16 p 30 30 3e 30 ■..' it, 4 ito •,.� 30 30 ,-..,. me • /4 !zo t"ay . • -+s.aNuf.7 +aos,fo•aa.�' .—»of,/osa. .1sos.wsui S. - FOURTH S,r) ST. r°: - s so-47s/ / 14r4 .F.i.) CC • I ,y 0 40 40 40 A. 40 40 40 46v,,5, 4;�� 40 40 •,\L/v G 5 4 3 2 / o. o ' ° r1'bfy uk h H � 01�0 TO , g`I % �'� �� N N C K. �.pe�` �P fi v V 1 0' 4 "0 040 40 40 6 40 40 40 40 40 , o izo 0 tzo izo p et1 . 7 p"."016° otc•Z4 :Ifog ?t) igir Cr ,a �o 4'' w 3;� 0 2,. � � yt 1324.13 / > q a0°°otgs/6 4 93,,.so ,?a• l�9 yo<< _ g e y 4 4o o :. 0. lo /0 e,� ptiti izo 0 /y y, sal, ', St R�) spy 30 30 ` // 1 ° v )6°ozoy/4 1.0 CP _sr /� c /2 yb�0 ^ 1 v'', 'b Q�G`,`G ,!! 1 1r�P 0`N d 7 !20 0 0ti /6 pZ' ` Iv !6 0 I q vi �b d h 1 5 GD• vZ' R�& h It.? „ 0 M 1Z !b 4• •8 o sy I Jo j30, ,3'• - ill) F,ti 4 �k& Order No 473062 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Company of Washington, Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N S SP-47 cv 4 e•-,+,�eo sr.) 5. 3/'° Sr. 6 44 ¢ 40 2 44 Jo 0 6 a 4. Zap ' O 0 L N•A Aiip e0 y ii,b • s o so p 0 1A R of 10eop • vp• 0 r, 0 0 p 4y +Ty °� ; __„zi 44 44 40 40 44 _ 4¢ . 44 44 4o 0 N a N C4 h N 1 .. ui T ,zc t(,c3 o,so gy�4; �° 7 4 °DQ Q no (6 C) n ,y` 8 15N01 •IW 3 : 8 pfith Q- • N. =• ---/s kt.§ 9 1' 2a - ; 9 agoo 6 O co I /0 0 0► , % , /O 40 Tr M. //, 1 D I tg. . 20: x : ♦I ,a�0 CO I`' co 11 o° �0��9• = /25 ire _ IX . �i. f la 0 vioait t . 13 g 1-a' /3 cn 7 --oo , 2 4 p Imo �� ., zo S N 0 use /l I , u 3D •�/.5 go A'}p 7 Ito it nod%6 ? /f' `(qo IL.. « ILO l� IZD ' 3o 3o r4.1% w1sarlia$s, ILD �� 7sesuos6s—� •t . o ri 4. s. , c(rA Sr • aik\ Order No 473062 PACIFIC NORTHWEST THEE Company of Washington, Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N ' • 20010323000518 PTANSt TI1 O1TIUD 10.00 003 03/23/2001 09:47 KING 'COUNTY, UA RETURN TO E1807051 03/23/2001 08.37 KING COUN•TY, WA 50 CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC SALE 3207,500.00 PAGE 001 OF 001 910 MARION ST. SEATTLE, WA 98104 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED PACIFIC ''NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE O �f 7D.3�0 /o5Reference #' (if applicable) _ Additional on Page u, GrentorlsP BEVERLY ANN BLACKWELL Additional on Page. CDCORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC o Grantee64 c - ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE 0' Additional on Page. cv Legal Description LOTS 1-2, PTN LOT 3, BLK 4, SMITHERS "'' SIXTH ADD TO TOWN OF RENTON V26/P47 o . Additional on Page o Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# 784180-0090-02 0 THE GRANTOR BEVERLY ANN BLACKWELL, A SINGLE WOMAN for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE, A CORPORATION SOLE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON the following described real estate, situated in the County of KING , State of Washington LOTS 1, 2 AND THE NORTH 20.0 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 4 OF SMITHERS SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO: S E EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. Dated• •� FILED FOR HELM Al THE REQUEST OF TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO B Y ANN BLAC ELL NOTARY PAGE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) J } as County of / 4 6 Y } I hereby certi that I,know oy)have se story evid c that is the person who appeared boe me, and said person(s) acknowledged that (hers,?they) signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be (his,at, air) tree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument Dated �� O� NE I J\�•ygioti G�0tat /1/Iil/� e%~:0NOTARy i� 2 Notary Public in and for the State of ashington •;• •v PUBUC N i � � t A ()if) , .-.Printed Name t .. . Residing at(, /1//4 My appointment expires g -()C) esi ..-- Ls, 0 0 o STATE OF WASHINGTON ) crz ) se c-i County of ) M 0 I hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that r c is the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(e) acknowledged that (he, she, they) signed this N instrument, on oath stated that authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledge it as the of to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed Name Residing at My appointment expires r EXHIBIT A SUBJECT TO: Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon the land herein described in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roads, as dedicated in the plat. LA • M , \/ .p•-•;i rik:. 4.• • rasvar, Pi Jul 30-11) 10-23 • ;P.m C -18 ,I•?71.i, - ••;(:( -1 . Martir, zubitki asl hie wife, tatie itu,cieki of E.CW i;";'.. ,.• :7•• WiollttkW- ''. :,!., • , I, _...... .,:. . to Chi.0460, U111Lvloo ,:, Ot, .744 7...14).V14V CompAn2, A 00.7 of the 2i:( fLic of Pp for themselves and for their hro a 4 legal rep nby oy to MI th e -.°- ',:•i.4,• •'" right to erect ann.ann. maintain an glectrio TresiemicaiOn 57Stom eler ::1 t%. . :-,3: i:. .-. al& 'and aoroec the fol clog real prop sit in Zul • . .'l - 4.''. The W 3i ft of Lots 16-17 and 1 8 BlIr, 2 Smitherie Fifth Add to the ....; To= o.,. Renton . ., • . ....! , -, This easement to oovar the erection .of poles in alley and. over4iang,.. 7, of ad 31- ft by ros and oroee.. rm as.:•.at least M. ft_above •tho ground-..,:] wi . ( ....... . Railway COmpan;(• agrees...to 'pay .in.,..addt: far A.11.:,ailligigeS to fence.* • - •-.1 . . ,..... .. ' crops, animals and periwig. by•Ireason.Of OCnt.traCtion•and oporatiOn na : I .•of oh' pewer lit* slaate.idttexlimixtecte3tetxioxla.....- • . • . . .i . Sd'..sytiteti on W Si• ft. Lots•':1.6117 '3:‘'::18....consiStii.g.of uo poise Vini -4 .i. • .the.noCestary trolley and-transmission. wLrost'anchOreAndHgays ' .1 I •aria the- right to- clear trees •frosa'. endangering the line being as .; :, . '• ,....-, .1 ! _ ,• • stated :above. • f . •-.• ; . . • Martin SAbleki Si . . ,. , - • • . her . . ..,. •••• "!.• wit • ., •-• Zatisf. m Kabi.iski Si . . . . •. • Floyd .11.171.3.1isme k. • =w . • ;:.,5,.. '..,:;;;;:•••.. 1 . • •KCILJuh28:•16 14'Martin Za.bis)ii and Inv Yntie Knbioki bef Flo7d K...:FDA iiiM U.11P or the SW re s at 8-11(•• SS Mar 5-19 IMii t0 14W.Adame, Sec C.M. &.-.3t41)0117 CO milwauee, wts.) -• •-. •• ....__ . , ... _ .., .... ..,_ •-• . . , . . , . .:L'-'.:1',,---: :::•;- -,.IiS.FAititli.-Jnl. 50-18 10-23 ...... i 51.-.:.:- :-;••:,•.••%:•:••••:•:.:•-:...4•;.41140,#111:!::-$2B.:...- • • ._ : • . , • • I_ /(;-•.-.;• ...:.. ; :,. '7':...::::'••::::.*:...::::7 :. •••::43411ttit*:iintliiii':Bane,.Bilertaan*of-,:itr.I. .) ‘._- ' • ,e, K;::•:•:',7.:•:::,,•::,,- .•,:•" :..::•.: 4;,!•4;*Vh"I'oe.';6•6.-;,..1.tilwEitlicee•Tk';tt.:- Paul'itiilvta7 Company, a Corp of ;-_,„„:..1.",:i......::::.:..,:.-.... ....,..,..:.t,iiii34:$ .itii:-:of:'..Wie•-:-."'•:.,::'• '.....2:...:. -......,,.:.'. ..:..:• •.'1: ;•• . , '''::"4•:::•';:.-.2.::.'7ni;-•••:.::Pii4efilit.:tb.ittilli3lieil'''ciiia. .for ..theiric.hiPo. ‘n 1 18E44 rap 'nby cy to the i 1.... 147:-..:,-....• ..2...:,y.::.-.....: ,I. —,:.. ... •. _ 7...... . . .-.. .... • ".... " :4; i . ,_5•'''"'.:.;•..:-.!..I:':-:•:•-•.'•• mr.:44.:,:ntnt....-_,:t.oi:,erpe.t-and.:...Maintain-an Ma otrio •Tranemies i on System W...., . tiV%-i.;.::: , 't•.:.. • civei-iiiIg..atiCitiiiiis....thd's'f61:•.dio:Tial,prep eit in ko oW . t...,.. . • . . • 't • • '''''''''''.".-. --- • . Tliii".71:•*7.f.t...of: fot,::41..•Blk..147.Stitlitir Ye Piftl. Add to.the Town of ! ti-• .. • Benton.',' :.-.:...••::.-•: • '''''.,?...!..:...).,;:•.:.;•,;q&s:.:(',:.,••::.••• ...:.:•'.....'''',...;, .•• . , :-...;.'•)•":-:,:7•:....:- Thin'.easemciiii;ta •oovar.'0111•::the-1:_erection of polee in alley and : •f4"•••'".v;:.:'•v•:i••••:''''. '• ovorkhang:,.o.f.,:.;..kek..3*,i-ft.i.: .by,...wirea-and. orods-arms at least .34 ft ; .S.. • • • • , :•••::::,4:...- .. • -- a.bCial;,Vie;:4-iditi,i,:•,;:•:•-:.:r:-...-;:,;:',.:•.•.',.,-..:::-.......•••..- •- •.,,," . - i ,,.......... . .,.,.... 2ktimazgazifixaxgrizorccompciftExamktou- doeetendoegot. . A' .T...-7, •j. ':..1 • • - - • BlitiinifC45104,p:iittiles7:16-.Iiiy: 1.itii::-Eiddition for all .damages to.. •''•:!" " • . •':•t•' feliOite...:,otopp;,:,:aiiiiiiiiti. and persOne by reason of oonstraotion and I ':....'"••" ,• :,:: .. . i'7t ,?::' .:"•-:'...,' • ,operation Zor tracYoWer.:line. " *,• '•:.'...,;.'.. •,',. 4, I '1;•7.:,•';':::•.,.- • Sd• byitem•on W,s:Mil*It';: tot'll oonsisting of no poles and the -...:' -•,:- ( !:',1•''..::....• . .•... negespaat. trelle7 and 'transmission-wires, anchors. and gays, and • .1.: • ! .12(,:::::::v. ...,•..:•••• ."•• thUright to•olear trees from endangering the line being as • i stated above. A. .Aoeimmi . Si • • ( 1'44. : • - • . . Ena-Bevan Si • . -• . .. XCY Jun 28-18 by A,Beerman and hw Etna Beerman, bef Floyd H. . r....;.;:.'",'',..• •••• I ?.( •-.;..-,:• •.•:.• • t.Villiams•N2 for. the SW res at S-W NS Jan '5-19 "1 (Mail to E.W.,idams, Sao O.M. (1) st.P.Ry• Co. Milwaukee, Wis) . . ;*:',.e.:•..:;;;.,.. . i 3.7f,:sr,„.:••••,:::-• ---- . ,g,,,,-%4v.- '''' '• SET Pi Ju.1 30-18 10-23 , 1232957-;‘:; • •ogi..`P•7::.': ' Jun 28-18 425. i',17:?:<*k:•;• .• .. Minnie B. Thomas, a widow of KC ; .) • i to Chicago, Milwaukee .33 St. Paul Railway Company, a corp of the State of iris . . Fp for herself and for her hrs a ,Fc legal rep hby oy to the op the ;:i--• • . ';'.•.4.-, right to erect and maintain an Electric Transmission System orsT ,., ...• • ) i .i!.;7(:)i•-' alg and across the fol des real prop sit in Kow x!:.••• / , The W 7?: ft. of Lot 27 21k 1 Smither's Fifth Add to the Town of . .. ii.3nr.On This ease:mint to cover only the arocton of the poles in .ley a i and over-hi:mg of sd 31. ft. b7 'Arco and °rocs-arms at least 34 ft • abovo the ground. If.;.: • •*:'• ' ./ - , . ...._....—_. • . - • . .—....._. _.. --___ , , / eiv lip, .., 30-10 10-23 n G .y• ; L;,+9 r• n 1.A Jul , Jun i ft 7' �'t�. $.u'�ie trutiski of E0 o$ .--- - �=• ,�: a �µ9tk6.01, 1 h10 wife. a Corp ,' wr +., w L l ^t 'wu3 Y„�ilaruy tlompwttir Ala Qni,nc 6d r nIA the 2talc of WIN bra a legal rep Way 3$ 19 Nit +b• , :r: p for o eroolvaa. m tax their .+ rich" to ox±tot a> maintain as Elleatxi.o xxan+ fi®•ioa 8y9tex O4Sr '; y4 , « 1 a v Cp{ r11.g 'and ucrose the fol doe real prCV sit :.: +r Smither'B Pifth Add to the The �& 3� ft of Lots l6-17 and 19 �i1.• Z To eofa Renton ov groan •. This casement to resaand o oee_arme:at least 24. ftlabavedthe, hang ' : of od a,� ft by War a do for all Qamages to fences oro .Q nimalsy ngroer ot pbY reason of'donstitotion and' operation- , oropn. .animals attet neraone b9 -- .. ewer lite ....• poles and of. such p of 9tl. syc:tem' on W " tt• S,ota TE i'l .1$ ooreis.ti hore�and es rl. the necessary trolley and' transmisa�,on wiros4 ,, ®ring the line being se •�°•`�,'< ana the right to clear trees from endangering :u • stated • $bone.• Martin Inbiski Sl ,`° her ... • �Stie z . • gnb�t(ieki 91 rrE:; • KCILJ— Floyd R;willisme y,artin Kubiski and bw Katie Xubiski bef Floyd 3C1�:..7un:28�18 b�' Ii.=:WiTl'isma PTP tar. the SW rea at S�W BCokIi wau3t ee: W1e•} �'� ''` (�;l'to E.W.Adams, • Soo C.M. k-St._."cy - 12329 b6 � - �`•� PS Jml• 5048 10..23 f 1. *,,. 8'•1:8::$25•:. • _ x ;.dunOi.�,.' and.:`hbv`Edna.,Beerman of:XCW.. a corpof ;i .-. ;'Bo O iii . gt silray Company, X. , fit. „,',,,,1•: . Wie •. . .. ..... • to the T r.:-` a<o'1:th:o.f- : r-hr.s ,: legal rap hby oy ', . .��: ��• ��;: �'o��thsmealvota'-a�aa fo.-thei_- an Electric •�renen,ission System ; t 'erect'and•:.maintain • i. . ...:`; : ep' lZo:;.xi'ght . o....,. .. zit in ko aw • _'' W. the deg':real .prop : !'. somata fOla • ', Lot ithOx'a 'iftY. Add to,tk4e Towzl of • -t. p t of •21: 31X"1'J ua : Iuo:a< s f : . . . i ;`- Rentoa.... .. . .:..:. ;;:. •:;;..the'.=®reotion of Folea 3n alley and • . Thieetiaement 'to :eover..ay.'. , '-e.nd arose-arms at least 44 ft abo9� tho;;6ro ind`. � ozxz,+,zga cimot ' '`aadition for all damage® to.:and in'r n: tk i,. A,g eea:-.to`�pPWY' of coda ages o wa Co t. y reason�:•.' • ienoes.�, arops'':ii'niinahs: aria 'p ' are1'�lin ;` �s°��:,L�: '...:� :��:•. ® ofno poles and the -•.� ,ark!)< onconsisting - anahar6 and gays, end tt;:.Lot•.`21 consist ng �s:;:; .:: neoSd'Ae►yeary l r lle• ' a .. �••••:;C•r, } �1 •n•,A,,+,�,+r.';tia^.u6iLs.98iCII wires, 88 � .-;:n,:.., .. n�oerighv to cled•• eying the line being l 'a: 51 .�.._:... th'c.: right clear 'trees from A. �imea r::: . stated •:� • -. . . above. Edna Ber man <,<:.; bet Floyd H. , • :.:. XCW Jun 23-18 by A.Beerman and hW Ei•na'Beerman, , Williahe SP for the SW roe at�S-7 NS Jan. -1l�vaukee, this) 1 ;�.'•• toE W.:�dams, Sec C.M. .c St.P.Ry t 7 ,w:y 10-23 G k' EA5F,i+:F.:1T Pi Jul 30-18 ��` 1925 `: . i :;: . 'Sinnie 5. Thomas, a widow of KCW :,ail^ C m-�an a corp of � ' .*;� `•`` to Chicago, Milwaukee do St• Paul ,,.. tc the ep the „:,.:... .. the Ste,te of Wie 4h.y.:.a:,.: •. • ^p for herself and for her hrs a k legal rep h Y oY C, a, , right to erect and maintain an,Bleetric Transmission Syater o•h'-' .:,2VA4� r. alg are across the fol doe real prop sit in KCW ; 1. �,Ya= j,F,.; The tt� ;�. Pt. of :,ot 2.', Alk 1 S::•ither's Fifth Add to the Town of . ' :'�:, It3nton - tho ,-•motion of the poles in alley and � r ti c,C? T11ia pasemer.t to aoyar only or:lotion.:,f•.•;-. t �rires and cross-arms at least 34 ft riE.•!:::.` • eve+-harm of sd 3� t •• by;,;-•: :lbovo the croun3. Jnr le s- .a:�vr,* • -'. ''ld fle: -•-1,1 10^;,7 1441000 i �i a^r r� ,'.:4 ,�':+-�1�� •a is 5• ��'" lIch.:? ri r,.•,s ;end• 1:?7 P ? �31dridir! of koc d '' to (,"1rj�,gs,"1�1:-a-,:::• .% ry5' Maui bailaray Company b. ccrp ofVis fp for ti:-al::".1yan , and their hro ., aetaigus - raidlagalo .repo ::1 - to t ,- op tha r lgnt t o =.:i�r�.. 3St0. ..:mini a:�:i an llec t r ac w, te,a sraitri'fl ayr.t4rm over , a,:to::g and a.•roae the foil; rs pty in loan ; 11 .-.-1 of nt 1. of sec 10 tar..d ' the is of the IT of naa13 , ear..). '_a tp 23 n r d eaet w y The 5 poloc hill protti d for tc ba act each 12 ft SSly fr the . _ `r 23iJ r i��is+t o wa fence of C. a: ti t a P `�.i -- co• : t. -, " ao3.�os and the neceso trolley =n i • '441 w��.�,.�rj�'.OOa.L 13 oi'3g vi' a � t triailJ"`.. ea$:o:: •wif ao arnaharit sad guys,, end .the right to a 1. r r ;r, et from andtkn5aring the lt.1i , there being no ranchos aoha1 gidridfie el 'gi p.: .- r L c`yl$rid'g4..991• :ts; ' Till 31-ia by Rachel gid$.;tga., and hh, ff L fi1d r143etge ber; .iloyd Tilliam4 ,. n p for wn ran at 9 II S •t•eh 5-19 • :-. a0 � t dr" 8 ap 3•-18 1 r�-1"r 12416' '�• -, .k:. = . :; a •"�9i"OT: d Y1Alf Lt;<lt� 'D .clti•ason ; of jl: C l i n CO Fan' acorp of.!i3 • •.��"" r o 9�M1'j,�6i'til$.ld Ct. y��ir �315�• xiL�Z'i9€�y � .1r:'.; • • . :. • A = for - al , .erect And andgal p... > do a :,z1:3 maintata• � ... , . #1 tint .:ti''.iL* 2.i*OU •ey8t.>133.o't ? 'along and across the ;x:: • . . . .. ' ,F;:!.....;. ..•.. • • her ' �i}th.�d8 to the t a 17n of �y,.:..�. :' s. • t,to:0a*rsq_ 3nly eh:, �r4Otivf or pole)* i.n ,1,, ':, <,.rT�V V!+�•1":fit. 4 .'7�icW yrLLV ,y•J ,1. ' _ • <-•,..�.�.' c _.:, ;., Y.:::n for all d lg9. to fence. ,;iitilLit-e - _{,.'•' : i • . ': "reSion of a one true tion and • ir- d the X'c. • • = ',; an..-�f:.;.$ f.- 3.:6t•`24.. oa^sieting 'of no poiA 9 a•n :V= tt and • '` ' .r i.a.._...•.:ti.A:-sltie>t ti si�li iiiai"'nti te" ,�nr'l or2 esi'� g bie��.^•.'' '. �:�'�'P.�.',�'�•�tis+e+�yT ,.•,,o.�....'. rr+...-...-� 4 f :0 o eiii .t'ilii4e•�`ftdm' «iiliangtlring the line , bei g a7:• ffi.,.3 at'.c-e3:• . ...:. -.,. :.. • Vic aan: 61 ' , r1+} At '•2-'18 by 3 A•'I c?ti7nsso , ,and *is wit , Lula tokinton y�}1yax' •4.= c34 �' '•./1-1371iw • n T rtrvin re at •m• /Y h,:,1,,,,� m,,L- I•cp •.::`- 1241692 - • 'XL w-.• -rC SPw� i• 'L' of New Jersey• ::% " 751 .r r o= r, a,:oro of he a•r t . to i + � ti- T 1 i lleply company q -• • 1 a oo p of the at of Via - fp, s b s c,,- to thezp its one:. an the fdld in 'or :"''7 f r•h '-ying cn the 113' O n yai. ofaad u v • t ^. •z rnd ight of o r..y hto c r,a eyed by the fp hin by ••'�' 7 L,�* 1'(�•..... ,;. f•. s{ .t *,:'a'h, U:•r}K)f the t�T �" of hit�' of . 34,, • a `,t.z��. ,'; .�7� „a . b •n N n 6 eacrt of the w m lyingbat in tp.-x » t'v3 ram.l [tS! ',•_ • 1; Ain; .:;r' ad •:f "•: Of li:. np rid a line p,,,a-a : :' ." .!, 1 ;a�r,_�:-, .,,.f ra c-':r ;,.d eero••�o end 9AC 25; also .• ... . ;;� ft : .. :.'L• -_;•'_:?'" of the �'.:ly of of And eson- • . _ - 3d by ad deed dtd Itor 23 .. _.,. o y y3 ?v inr a t the • .1w*._31813 , I i'l 17, , - C. Y;ti 0• •,,1 .F R SX ! 1\ C MY '\!t ` t r / Pp cad w to c p the fig d r L t > > '-' and 'y•3 a 'd2'oo 16 Rees' Add to the of S sit i i X • y :o•.. Ruttle ��yy 2 IT .Corinne Ruttle Si I KCW Sep 17, la by Corinne Ruttle bef John W Hoal sr N P i and , i the soy ?i r a S N S Ugly 15, 22 old by C.:a_ntee Mail Galesburg, Michige.n . . **ill• ( • '" Rase .Nov ov 4, 15 9•35 sa I, .,y,- • Zuni 2S a S �� • J�1 l�L al i s �.na his fib° L°asi on TO Qii aaga, :�i1e ee R St Paul Ra��§ i . - •Ytt alis •, of•RCW Railway Compa'Vy, a corp of the t • S of WI scon»i n PI'''. •e .ror, them an'•vea star. d . fox tivalr. L as .and legal, rep, hby oonv t._ - :t`h e''"P;:..fo„•-;the: Sum o f 4125. the right t o erect and ms.i in ai n &,n -7111.:iiklteXitiMtition Syetam oar,. a1g ande:�:s the fig, de8C reel prc ;':: .';'r, t PifthAddtotha T o S �-�.� • , •�:,_:- .�.t`.�:��:�4'=;tio��: 22:�::��:�o�.�.��. 5mitk�e�'e1. is":~ Vic; - �y ' ::sir::" : ''`.Y " o es in alley, and ;:,.,:��•: � >easem�i�`'�o.��•�n'v.�t=��oriYy th�,.. ercctign::�o�:�F 1 r o . e::s •�• •.. at least 34 ft 3b .b wires to n.d ar-ia. arms • .. : ; - �; .:ti ..:;. " - .a ',� .for:1._a11 damage:s.- to• fencee, crops, anime.lc • °; : '3' 2 ;.: •.. -aiid pas ation of such pow ' •:,:: 401 ?A1146, is ':b re: 2.1..A4 Donal-ruat..0n, ;. ' ..,.•owL•; i no o l e s and the `.t ��°��:2 �oonsi:et w nQ of p -- ;•, ",..,,.. bsrs e.nd s• and i -':�' - '•• . ••>ea�e�l " �"'t:•x, 1 0 and`�'��rar��m ';aBi�ne.:�i,ree, c'dr!o� 3�Y ..,,. trees.'fr:on.'endangering •the.• line being .:,; :,,, • . No. ii . • . . ' • ..';:tiliri••Kukali • ,;, • .Uaz'ion Kiasli s Si ;=<. tom ;,.: ..: by . ' ,aiin.Ku:;taii i:'aiia':iris. w Marion Ktt ali a bef =�io i 3. , . 1i P. i...aria•;:f•'" a of in ••r:r•a.:I.a• Wash. R Sklar 3, 12• Yid by Grant e e '}ail . W' Adam SO•ci C i & St P By Co Mitlwatikee, . 125g�ci a ...�• �Y.. •3•„t '/I,, 7 Q ?O,5 G I BS S "i, r • . ,:�n ':,!, • ..i t "i,14 c;»o widow of RC:! /,'� I • :, ti^;.:'g7, i1.�3•�see & St Paull Rail:ra.�y Comp:+ny • a" •4C2' of the 8 e`i "18 f • .: .t .,n1,, cy1•" �.:1r i!,:l ^ en.-1 for hor h .a and logsl repg hby cony I,1: i- • t :; 7 _�o n.nd n. -rf.:r th., ala.:n of 1.0 &Ind ovo tho right to arec' ` .77.7d 277 ,' 1(. in :u-1 ''LsO '.VranF.:raisoicn rzten ov, L-',1g and :3c the 'fig r- •) i. . :.:7'3 .:, "' , T2'1.0-..•_ i '.'.;1,1 ` : [ .::� ;!c' et 'Zan i "r e Tr ct P, T 110 i0: . .;•• tin +. S ��nn: - :1 CS` ^A 1 .� or 1 1 0 set `iA 4. t ..,_ , ,,n tl + Q: C , crot , � • c /3 J yj° Er.t ernQnt .Nov v, ;.a :g:35 : Y CW �i � To Gertr0-1 J Chicago, Itiia.uke e & St Paul nc.i Away Co , corp of the s o- ylisc • i'; does for herself and for her h as and legal rep hby oonT to the • its s and a fox the aura of {5d• the right to the and maia� 4 s p ` twin an oleo, Tranami 2Rion System or, alg and ao the figdde"so reel prop sit in a'C :o00/it; ; • tat otr�es xnd►-ci:ea. et The. right to ovsrhan - to st .. ..d i -o f.. sat'. .-•- fr. or,zi t* 3: is . . � • ft t he .. 41 .for M 1 'Smstheas'.--P'fth d" tc Sent orn, � co .. ta_ t''_ r all. e0 'try fences, .b1 g and persona ,b? :reii'so "'' ,S*ItT"o:' te nano s.::or• ,falli.ng_of-.-ad t:az Mieazoa""line.:':T-�i:-''pt�1er:fn: . "ley ad t ri: 'Js�_//sa i q'.'t'o ae..set"•:az".esnst• 10 't S .of. •grantet*:.�reseat- back bit: _... . , . . • �. �t'� tQ. nti'is'e s b� v". itiii7;7:w :aid " ."Sd'`�s.,ii;.:�,�`�'coa•�.,.s....z�:• of no. .poles ... - the_;i:�:ght••..:to...'1�6�'fr�"" trees. fle iCO en w#:re9:. anchors and gene .acid: . . • `tom. 4 .tha'.line only the over-die, • as tab std`,, • .8 tt '.Y!$, v ':., cis•' vs ads ge8k3^w Rr1�..Clrf:.R ; :s :yb Mrs:.�±e �'i3i1L��k .::r. wT��'�.�ip•'.°.1.;�+.��17/ii ew. •w+.�� i P ''s''.�nQr'"r,, e.;;..a.;:bf:::W "r a S: '� : :;' ':: 1 ':" k is `A1*41;4Aili4iili�eie':Wf:'�i' _ . . •• • • =i;:.Ho d:'4 :. 18' 9.37 • ' 1258322t• ` - :. Qct::'-28 '`''. ''' . • i,t• ::,:. : anV � :a; p .:Ba .:ad XelU • his p •o . • / SCrsrki s• acbt"•'8 -affre' d pla✓ae:::. ." • -. 3• •::'- t ' .: $,o.: ',erg:t,'o... - S0p:.. with i a.. g�►" I .�:;�'f`i�t�:'�ta:� s�•�:�,;:r �:�:�_.. .,.. .� �",;: •� .. . sce...to a p the fig ,ud' _d ri thai t ' grace. AAiteirt�e�Z• ��z3�'1�-;�8' �ri::'e'�:�:p;.':�:'3;'�r�'°:.'e'_,, Park ':.:�•�:.:`. ';;�" ;`�.:;:- _':.::: �-�.:�;:.:: .:�:�'•=•:::::� A: _._ : �o• .�•�n : 'it. Add t o the i•" ' �. Z�ya;.3��`:a�•d:�3��•;.i�'ri:Ell .�•-_�:b. . u•�� i C of 'Rest: .s..•(This :..ait,g" .�ey.be`.for"eol".'if taxes and. aemts are not pd when. dYIE)'•• ,.;. .. " : Ita3 #:a :Hap s-- IC= Coy 22, 18 by w W Haas• and •Ne.11ie. fisas, his be " duliuo Manus P i 9..r,d f tile.. a of fir a S iY S J't 22, 21 ` "' '.j,i,.;,1 t`. w.vv4e 22:s .C�lzik'3 :31 dg • {ice 323 to 327 '� - N, v• i is`R.�iL �- ��. .D 140 4 iCi ii:,:•Li j _ u a 16, 1$• Con 4350. �O.50 IRSX t,�r ,i a�te-1 ;Y. +5�.,^.c:o1 ?nth &ami a liunnel, his f /�," 1.2; : ; ;i n'U , a mi doi :i •; G1)..d 4, 1.() 9 p Lilt, 1.0.; .Is': t. e 'i,' r..:~-.tr:,ct 33 .� _ ..:.t't(7o' pt:1 KC:' d as fol.,. ,, , • if. of the 5r ce:� th6+ dun 0 COD 4)1AVv Wle' ,. 4 .vr.vr- .. rae - - Lia.rtin. Lagar doxdot •`'') 1.a Jo.ephine 2 irlo tt, Oat owners, e,s . sap p ty • to Zola Still, a be - Fp cy and '::tr to by the fi. des re sit kcw That pti3 of the SNP 7'� of the BV+ of the W4 Gi' sec 14 twp 23 n: S own d:t Dag 1510 ft E of the W quarter oor ; th NZly 250 ft to co road? CI SEys 265 ft al co =;d, �L u.; th 127 ft to the E .d 11 3�:artor In of :Id .' 1�;; th Wiy An the 14 and W quarter in to the pob, , martin Edgar Gordon Ella Jotuphine Barnett kcw Jun 8 46 by Martin Edgar Gordon bf C. J. Rt:d np for the sr rem at North Bend no Feb 9 49 Barnett kcw Jun S 46 by Ella Josephine Barnett bf C. J, Rudd np fax the aw.` .1e Feb 9 49 (ml s t North .*Ad WA) iv�i at North Bond i.. r ass.. .. D Jun 11 46 • 3577661 a Apr 4 45 #10 .44.95 i ra $4.50 et ' aejf John R. Durney and Mary Ellen Durney, hot • to JohrC. ..Viokrey .cad E11a J. •iokrey, '.ref /1, pp ny .lanA mays .tom :'a,= ..the fl des re .sit kow • • . . A ptn of Lot 8 hik .35 Smi.ther°'a Sixth Add tothe�Townxof Raaton Wn ,• df: van at thIg• :ti'YV .00r of lot 8 .b1k. 35 i of ►_mith • the Town of Renton Wn .as .a .pnt of beg; :th N 890471. E 120.,00 ft; th 04131 E 20OQ- ft,•... th S 5°33 6 '20" VI 21.93 ft; .th S '89°471 w .- 100.00.ft;. .th :. - 0°13' -W 29.00 -ft -to the .pob; Sub to eaemt .fcr• water . . . 1n on :S. hndry.. in.,; . : . _ John R. .Durney . •1 Mary Ellen-Mulkey .. . Jc 'Durney end'Mary Ellen Durney bf B. .Zell3r kcw Apr: 23 .45 . hn R. op 416 Barrie St; Renton .{� .gyp fax the sw i�es. at a .na Oct 19 45 t r-, •3577662 • � Apr 6i+6 14 .. /2 Y" .Don Parker, a bath _..../ . to .G.-.0.. T.. -Thompson and Matti(' L.. Thompson, hw: ' •y-.ann•tioYn t0 aY1 0 -J. i, emi -vie s_` %3** _ .�;•: �p ;nv �r . Lott .9:10 and U :bl k. 19, Plat of Chautauqua Beaoh ,:• �.. Don'Parker . . . �s: kow Apr 6 46 by Don Parker ;I R. E. Strom np ib r the sw res at . .••.•• ,:• Vashon mcdam no Apr 14 49 (m1 Bp Va&i^n Wn) 441 kg .: 1..:' 3:77663 y% . • - `. • D Jun ?1 46 7 • Apr 30 46 'lO 1$3.85 Ira 3.50 st w a diet of 257 fig, /;n J. H. Avery nd Cleda M. Avery, hvf . th Ely al the highway - to W. J. Knight 100 ft, Fp cy and war to sp the fi des re st kow A ptn of the Na of the SW4 of see 7 twp 26 nr of the Primary at a point cn the North marginal line • State highway No. 2; from which point the intersection of said • North marginal line with the West boundary line of t' - or . of of se'c: section bears North 870 05' 1C4ihenoe n•' h 27 24 !'O" ;. •t. East, porellea with the West boundary line of said NE4 of SWW. or f, said section, 120 feet, thence southwest parallel to the highwe* . ; 100 feet; to a point on a line 257•:feet East of end parallel with th;' West boundary line of ssid Nvrtheest Quarter of the Southwest Ouertel o:' 3`i.c1 section; thence Soutfi 2°24'f:3" west 31^ng said parallel line" 120 fs to t'ae point of beginning, subject to all easements. . . .. . •• - - - '7. his heirs, execlIt,ry n • (( , , • ORIGINAL Pr/CET, . EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ROWAN `\ King Co. Records Division EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM Br :• \ic21\,'„r r - Depute For and In consideration of One Dotter($1.00)and other valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby 1 acknowledged.CORPORATION OF THE ARCHRISHOP OF SEATT E('Grantor'herein),grants.conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER a UGHT COMPANY,a Washington corporation('Grantee'herein),for the I purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual easement under,across and over the following deecrlbed real property(the -Property'herein)King County.Washington. I Lot 16 and the South half of Lot 17, Block 1, SMITHERS 1 FIFTII ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, according to plat recorded in volume 16 of Plats, page 33; IVBeing a portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, - Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. i i ij .: Except as may be anemias eat forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that Donlan of the Property(the "' y 'Right-or•Woy-hereln)desenbed as follows: ••± A Right-of-Way(4n'1101 feet In width having five(51 feet of such width on each side of a centerline described as r follows: 1 • -------- ,LrcaQ • The centerline of Grantee's faciliti s as constructed or ' • . •f to be constructed, extended or relo ated, lying within N the above described Property, •••; ; • O ` N 11' .7') 1, purpose. Grants.shall have the right to construct operate,maintain,repair.replace and enlarge an underground 1 electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Right-of-Way together with all necessary or a convenient appurtenances therefore,which may include but are not United to the following: underground conduits. cables,communication Ines;vaults,manholes,switches,and transformers;and seml•buried or ground mounted • facilities. Following the Initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. , 2. Access. Grantee shall have the right of access to the Rightof-Way over and across the Property to enable • Grantee to exercise Its rights hereunder,provided,that Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any damage to the Property caused by Ste exercise of mid right of access. 3. Obstructions;L.indaaping, Grantee may from lime la time remove trees,bushes,or other obstructions within , the Right•el-Way end may level and wail.the Right-of-Way to the extent reasenabty necessary to carry out the purposes sat forth in paragraph 7 heredi,provided,that following any such work,Grantee shell,to the extent :r reasonably practicable.restore the Rightof-Way to the condition It was immediately prior to such work. Following the installation of Grantee's underground facilities.Grantor may undertake any ordinary Improvements to the landscaping of the Right-of-Way,provided that no trees or other plants shall be pieced thereon,which would be unreasonably expensive or impractical for Grantee to remove and restore. • • e. Grantor's Use of Right-ohWey. Grantor reserves the right to use the Right•of•Way for any purpose not • inconsistent with the rights herein granted,provided:that Grantor shaft not conatrurt or maintain any building or other • structure on the R(ghl•df-Way,which would Interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted;that no digging, tunneling or other form of construction activity shall be done on the Property,which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the Right-of-Way,or endanger the lateral support to said facilities;and that no blasting shall be done within 15 feet of the Right•d•Way. • 5, Indemnity. By accepting and recording this easement Grantee agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from any and all clahns for Injuries and/or damages suffered by any person,which may be caused by the Grantee's exercise of the rights herein granted;provided that Grantee shall not be responsible to Grantor for any Injuries and/or damages to any person caused by acts or omissions of Grantor. 6. Abandonment. TM rights heroin granted shall continue until such limo as Grantee ceases to use the Right•ol- Way for a period of Ire(5)successive years,in which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shill revert to Grantor,provided that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to Initially Instal its facilities on the Right-of-Way within any period of time from the date hereof. 7. Successor.and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective lUXessors and assigns. 789.37 1.79 9404700•X01 KJ/AC001 235.73 (AHN)July 27,1994 pkm , 00'9 as 200 soonammatie 00t61t01 9/10-129016 • DATED this '& day of OA.. -..,�' teoY GRANTOR CORPORATION OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE, .h a Washington Corporation By L7t�,9.. ,�4z...� , ATTORNEY IM-FACT • By i t CD STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF ) iNs 0 On this gl des of 'al 12 4'1 r f 19 /q,before ,me .Notary Public In and foe the CO S a of Washington,duly aommfU1oned and swam,personally appeared r E.A.i,l� (� Cre -- !- !mac - l�•-1 and toro Ivwwn to Q of CORi ORATIt]N OFTWARGSRISlWOF SBATf.tfr aorpoid t ttrat executed the forgoing fnttin.ntt.. Kr and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of meld oorpondon,for the uses and Cr) Purposes therein mantbned,and on oath stated that they Whacked to mane the said Inatnum.nt , 1y ^J..• {NE A. GHM Print Nemo. Div Of-I A)L. A (n-AI 4/ STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 Notary Public In end for the State of Washington. - NOTARY--.• MEW I . My Commission Expkes 8-145 Residing■►_ u IMy appolntnrnt expires S- I-5 r • MLE�pFOWEIRECORD AT REQUEST OR REAL ESTATE DEPAFITMENT Beni ur i ' IEH.NEusoli ! . 1 t . t • �. l . S ."‘ty REi,i.4 CERTIFICATE C ' 1,the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Renton,Wash:ngton, certify that this is a true _* Ss '� *I and correct copy of OrdZrianre 4881 � � T e ,�y�` Subscribed and Sea d t`;;s y of •�� /_ TED s 6F RENTON,WASHINGTON J/, _, ,, i/ .r✓ �hi%�,,+�+++mmtim"" / ' ��D',�►Cle;k ORDINANCE NO 4 8 8 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING AN ALLEY, LOCATED NORTH OF SOUTH 4" STREET AND BETWEEN WHITWORTH AND SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH (ST.ANTHONY PARISH,VAC-00-001). WHEREAS,a proper petition for vacating an alley located north of South 4th Street and between Whitworth and Shattuck Avenue South,duly filed with the City Clerk on or about March 22,2000,and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3)of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated,and WHEREAS,the City Council,by Resolution No 3451 passed and approved on April 17, tv 2000, and after due investigation did fix and determine the day of May 8, 2000, at the hour of faa c 7.30 p m.in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public j. hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearings in the manner provided by law,and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto,• I and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it,and 0 WHEREAS, the Board of Public Works of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit,and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation, NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION I. The following described alley,to wit 1 • <. / ORDINANCE NO. 4 8 8_3 (The alley located north of South 4w Street and between Whitworth and Shattuck Ave S.) See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein be and the same is hereby vacated subject to an easement over, across, under and on all that portion as described on Exhibit "A" in favor of the City This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. The City may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the entire right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated at the sole cost of the o developer;and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs,successors in interest and assigns SECTION II. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $27,500.00 (Twenty-Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner-owners, said amount being 50% of the City's appraised value of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper 5 ORDINANCE NO 4 8 8 3 SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its'passage, approval, and five days after its publication A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law • PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this. 18th day of December ,2000 • Marilyn J. e en, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 18 th day of December ,2000. • o ; Je anner.Mayor c . N Approved as to form: Ceto-r.a4A.4.9 Lawrence J.Warren, de. Attorney • Date of Publication December 22, 2000 ORD 907:12/11/00:ma .• . 3 EXHIBIT A Alley Vacation VAC 00-001 Legal Description Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 16,Block 1, Smither's Fifth Addition,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,page 33,records of King County, Washington, thence northerly along the west line of Lots 16 through 24,of said Block 1 to the northwest corner of said Lot 24, Thence westerly across the alley to the northeast corner of Lot 7 of said Block 1, Thence southerly along the east line of Lots 7 through 15 of said Block 1 to the southeast corner of said Lot 15, Thence easterly to the Point of Beginning Situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 18,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W M,in King County,Washington CQ t � 9 O O • 1 1-1 -____- I • S 3rd Street v) •---r.� - _ _ I I— v _ .c a r A I. I `Y l S 4th Street o U - - - -- 0 Y VACOO j OO I . Alley Vocation � Tom Boos Techn'coi Se-vices c- !, - t h V fl y C 0:/05/2000 y ..PFrv102 ill �i`I l i I I, I h II1 Return Address: 20 'iOF 101170 1 2 City Clerk's Office PAGE OO1 of fee oN CORD 13 BD City of Renton 01 KING 7 CO001 011HTY, WA 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Please print or type information Document Title(s): ORDINANCE NO. 4883 - Street Vacation (St. Anthony's Parish, VAC-00-001) Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released. [on page of document(s)] Grantor(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials) 1 City of Renton, Washington 2. cv 3 t 4 ❑ Additional names on page of document • a Grantee(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials) 0 1 2 3 0 4 0 Additional names on page of document T o Legal Description(abbreviated. r e Iot,block,plat or section,township,range) N Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 16, Block 1, Smither's Fifth Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, records of King County, Washington, thence northerly along the west line of Lots 16 through 24, of said Block 1 to the northwest corner of said Lot 24; thence westerly across the alley to the northeast corner of Lot 7 of said Block 1; thence southerly along the east line of Lots 7 through 15 of said Block 1 to the southeast corner of said Lot 15; thence easterly to the Point of Beginning; Situate in Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington. O Additional legal is on page of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: ❑ Additional legal is on page of document The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein . , . . • ' • . _ . - . . i il 111...1 i , t . i . . . i , J . 1 _ i . . I 1 '" 1..i AL:c f.,:...10 1:'-.•.•'• 70227:: . . : )-1L; '-'a : • ,:r .1, 41. i:: V Pai -:t. h.l.,. Nf yr • 17.01..g ••I 4 1 • ' 1 I I , .• ' ' • re,: ,--::•. .,..( 1 A 'fr-a ". if 7J:A ... .31ne :0 Tc ' 4 '::': . ;Tr.., i!o • di P1 T.; ' 1 -7% 4 s':Vt i 322.e4 r't 1 .. 7 t.LI !',t. e• r f dl 0 t .,,.: th t') .t I L:.1.1 ed. W tid t ii U... fi - Lli .1'. 17. rt 4ng tc T.', 7 :e. a' .r. ' il 1F.' .15 ft . k : , te ': a; a i td, )... I.W .01 ft I I th I 114 . ;'. rt., tZi t''.9 pl Or $r 1.()%tasAr ...2 .1rvi4g 4 titri4; ;4' Id 20 it ,Idct 02'1' •;:.! !Ian W' ,:41,4 . .1.1 'tt well, !or :.t :d La i 1 t noldid. (f Old '''.1"n3fitvi • ..-crulnig i- ' ..,, .-rnteo %Q .L'it of' zr t.,!e •;•111:111e tore'ner . . a raid ;dr ..,t I : ... i I 11 . no NI ta Tama* !.i Pal' ' . . 1 1 Cslia V Pal sr I : Firw Aug 26-10 by fliP Fold CA) '.1.,..F 't ' Tsnatarw.acmar np for W repo at I lea,. ' e,i 14-12 ( 'n...! ::y grilles 2i ;"crt, 4rn sank '31de '.1,1 lj 11 .. L-r I i ! 1 1.! . i • 1 I .s... 1 .. . . 1 /..4110.417. • ..i a 4.0.. 7 i . 1 11 Dfld Aug .30-10 1".,:-:te: -td AI.1:': 1 0•10 ..f.:71: • ' . I . .1101;1 V :'r.:1 Ll'ert3 rfa.! 1 1' : .., i-e tn,.• At. l'hcrne 1 i 1 T:. .i..11an KIk1116 ,• e ' :.-.O. war to tri. t' e f*-1 ,i,sti real eAt . 1 \ tot 2.2. in 'elk 2. Slathers* Flfr:-. A.:(4. t%) t.,: 7 . 1 now part. of iftte City of Renton .4 Ce: ...t. t:'"!: "Cr, . ''. t tkof •zlyte . • and re-.ervt.liT to 'id fl. is exctre •,:d•-.73 :ill a scne 11.1 ola% ..torie -oil- and all T.Inerelp. lid -• ••: •1.1. r . ;0.3 it$:: It• T rte.'. to\ 11.1.ne fine -rorq t. •,... :• - -.• t"‘4 •s.'. . .1 ••'C'W I 1 I i bo '-':f" .• Fl.:t.in V. ' ,.11t1lers • ?red 0 r.•14'•Itl-ers : . 1 F7.urnett ''':-. ti. tvr-, • ... :..c Tborne .lly pf. . —. n 0 ,r". F. Burnet*, •,.r . ..r .2, . . 4- ' 1 : t:1 Trnr Aug 10-10 viy .7.21S s 1 f '7%a.,1 ' ".. ,r 1, ror -t• :i • t ..i•N'' real Pi ly 14-12 .., , 7-1, .. . . . . , . ! . , 4,,,,,., , • . . . . , -••:.4. . j , : $,,.. :, : • ,, , .. .. • Ili--' , : .....1 - • 1 • • . . . , , I : I . 1 _ 1. • . 1 I ';'.• .?I ''1 . i , . Y" AJ,7 IG•1;: ti ..!0:.;. .4r n! cr,e 19 •t4.-. :t. R. t4:1 :val. Ile: .. . . ..-- * i ''zx 1 '.2.1 .? rT.c.n • '..; I . .. i .., 1 .. 1 . 1 f 1 I.: ... ; / .!, ..7 :,-.• •. .„. ... 4.-- ;.:.,.. Cont. fld All 30-10 1-1 4111":02:77.2 7 6 AA' ______ -,, ntel Aug 17-10 . • . i•:;:. ,:1 .To'en G Z•111t11 and A.l. a J 1..nit',.. hi.s - f ...•.f A eT(‘ Graban, T -.441 44144 of F114.. vr....iese tee of 5 sk.4,., ,..0.4.1.-,..: l' ifr •'1. idill ,44.1.1 to apend 1;•,••Till ,;rr:•.7. i_ e f...I i f.‘-‘i f,:l de4 le In , A -KC, Al ..%.• . : -fre.../.... Lot 25 snd 5 IL) ft of Lot 24 in 1k 1 of Witidar ,aosmo F.eigkito Ad eta 7..,er Yap rod in Vol 14 c-r Plats !..er, 95 roes f:f .44 Co MA per - 1 .;:rtoe is • $3300 of aci3 the sun! of ia04.) 'e— 'In 1 . ..s earnest tine zyq.;;. WAuf is '.c.'• ., acid by fp -,,n4:4 11-.A :..n.t cf 2.2e C r Tcre ea 'intik incl'....41nr int tt 7,k; per cut lot 1 Impt 1 .1.0 until tlls at:.'" of ,:l...'jnO ,-Ind int 13As *a A an4 Oil., • ass,on;01.1on of a Titg f.r gi300 on ....e. , i;ty tr:i3. ap Ekrni, !Q 1,ELY 714%4 ar asrs ie. fele To f.;:.y 311 taates Ar:d cluirgrsb Vo. T.1.:i aftr i ),5c;•: •, 1.11:n on the p -erne !Ain des Cr 3ny •part t'nor :,t L'it :S t 10 • I days he r t*, ft Ia'-ea soul.f. I:.4.13e,•wi 1,3 ;:'vr•07" :Jell noi, i-r: !•-.;ding 4.4 11 : 1 unpe 1 net Imnt a 0 f 44-::::1 asa-ente now a I' I.-boa To noveb coin!lro-1.349 or :.tbAs-tviert sqttle any Ina ..,r Laverots ela3-43 to sd ppty or to any • r. tko,' t..'rtt ,....a-• ;rax.e t' ru BP To keep ilicired any b i : t. on ...o ...rett.s e'v r tbe 3eo4rityr af tuie f.• in 119e *VI, r f t '11,..en t.1.41 ! :••••••• • lee ! itI 1-• 44 Pn 4 i .... .. 1 !rob..• -• ' . .1 .... • •-.... • • PPCwIC NO1 rHwEST TITLE • Compwy of Washington.Inc. TO: Pacific Northwest Title 215Co1umbiaStreet 215 Columbia Street Seattle,Washington Settle, WA 98104-1511 98104 Attn: Dian Ref.# 41068676 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 PNWT Order Number: 460265 Seller: Finseth Buyer/Borrower: Catholic Arch Bishop of Seattle The following matters affect the property, covered by this order: • • A Full Update of the Commitment from November 28, 2001 through March 13, I12002 at 8:00 a.m. has disclosed the following: ** Please refer to Supplemental Report Number 1, herein. • The iesting has been amended to read as follows: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE, A corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington • The (following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 1, 2 and 3 III • The following has been added as paragraph 5: 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID; SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0105-06 LEVY 'CODE: 2110 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $86, 000.00 (continued) • SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT • Page 2 Order No. 460264 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,424.61 ' $0.00 $1,424.61 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 • There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since November 28, 2001, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of March 20, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1345 MSU2 AL_ PACfftc NomHWPST TI1LE Company d Washington.Inc TO: Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street 215 Columbia Street Seattle,Washington Seattle, WA 98104-1511 98104 Attn: Dian Ref.# 41068676 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 PNWT Order Number: 460265 Seller: Finseth_ Buyer/Borrower: Catholic Arch Bishop of Seattle The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 4 • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as, of December 12, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1345 KM • • PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtis@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Georgean Moore (georgeanmoore@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Debby Bigelow (debbybigelow@pnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206)343-8400 Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street Title Order No. : 460265 Seattle, WA 98104-1511 Attention: Dian Your Ref. : 41068676 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: November 28, 2001, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount $ 242,500.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 945.00 Tax (8.8%) $ 83 .16 Proposed Insured: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCH BISHOP FO SEATTLE NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. 2 . The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: ALBERT W. FINSETH, as his separate estate 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. j f • I Order No. 460265 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 21, Block 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lt 21, Blk 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, V11/P19 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 460265 I. The' following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or ' inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the-Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public xecords. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to , special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. ' C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. Order No. 460265 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. FORMAT: MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS ONLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OF NO MORE THAN 8 1/2" BY 14" . NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR WITHIN THE UPPER LEFT HAND 3" MARGIN. TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OF SUBJECT DEED OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR(S) AND GRANTEE(S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . (continued) Order No. 460265 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (continued) : 1. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0105-06 LEVY CODE: 2110 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $76,000.00 YEAR: 2001 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE DELINQUENT - GENERAL TAXES: $1,370.66 $0.00 $1,370.66 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 $0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 PLUS INTEREST YEAR: 2000 AMOUNT BILLED ' AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: $1,350.87 $0.00 $1,350.87 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 - $0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 PLUS INTEREST YEAR: 1999 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: $1, 179.05 $0.00 $1, 179.05 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 $0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 PLUS INTEREST 2. DEED' OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Albert W. Finseth, as his separate estate TRUSTEE: Chicago Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Key Bank of Washington AMOUNT: $48,459.00 (continued) Order No. 460265 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 DATED: August 24, 1993 RECORDED: August 30, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308302612 AFFECTS: Includes other property The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. 3 . Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of City of Renton. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. 4. Title is to vest in Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a Washington non-profit corporation, and will then be subject to: Evidence of the identity and authority of the officers of Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a Washington non- profit corporation to execute the forthcoming instrument must be submitted. NOTE 1: The records of King County and/or our inspection indicate that the address of the improvement located on said land is: 325 Morris Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055. NOTE 2: Upon notification of cancellation, there will be a minimum cancellation fee of $50.00 plus tax of $4.40. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Kris Ebbighausen Any inquires should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. • tas -- Addition to Renton Vol. 11 pg. 19 S 67-470/ 3/4 O 3o 3o ' 44 44 40 0 ' 44 44 30 30 44 44 4.a c40 4f 44• fl; 6 6 4 s. 2 / G''ySa 4 3 w 2 30 -30 r• ' i �44 to N O 4� ' \ ey% 1-- ate-- oao�. d 2 �1 .. 0 ,0 G ti f +2 ) o 6. 44 44 4o 0 44 44 44 N,144 40 44 44 411 > = /Z0 �� ILO /co 144 no 0 a a 1 7 M�� 0 ,eo4,° M t 7 .0 . .si4° 24• n ,� g ul 3 . 8 ,,00�gf� Q ., 23 :• 8 ...°44 C) 121'hh a3: o tn a • 9 �e�o°1°O-r 0. ,10 22 0 `"t 9 i��° "ply° 22 ` 2 • /0 44co 1. oc,0 do 2/ :• •/o Ti) .0°p��i �j1 2/. N - CO 0 0 • o c 3 • /a .°�°°b5 I.�, /9: FE . /2 ,�0 Z. �e�5/9' '4 H o c e a ,� o a e vi o }� , y �Z0 22 1 o /f no ,w t Ob/6 e� ,z/S iio�°o, n°,�'°p�/6 0 30 30 3° 3o �,... ito 16 Ito . , 3o 30 ...so. /Z° ° r6 /Zo '�'?i i ".. . .... ,,u.....r �q.....u. ,.n..un_ / S. FOURTH ST. 2 s 0,-47ka / 4 (AN.b e.) CC 40 40 I./i 40 40�A0 40 40 40 //.I 40 40 40 ' $6�45, 4 ; 3,,42 01,7a 6 5 4 3 2 / * o—� r� A .4 r,,, 0. m *f, a U . "' N N .peg • 40 40 , 4e 4044 040 40 ;ooze Ito ,7 CC . IZo lea Ares © ll.l 49 i``/7° ` 8 }ay15 ea m00%D°�ii' �` f /Zo a ` 9 40400 =o/6` : 9 s, tat , 30 3o • Y.;& ‘..4(.."s--__ PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Order No. 460265 N Company of Washington, Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience tot : locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. • • • ncincribmmwmmMm.E Campy of Woohinenn.Inc. TO: Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street 215 Columbia Street Seattle,Washington Seattel, WA 98027 98104 Attn: Dian Ref,.# 41068675 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 PNWT Order Number: 460264 Seller: Finseth • Buyer/Borrower: Catholic Arch Bishop of Seattle • The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • A Full Update of the Commitment from November 28, 2001 through March 13, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. has disclosed the following: ** Please refer to Supplemental Report Number 1, herein. • The vesting has been amended to read as follows: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE, A corporation sole under the laws of the State of Washington • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 1, 2 and 3 • The following has been added as paragraph 5: 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: YEAR; 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0110-09 LEVY CODE: 2110 • CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $103,000.00 (continued) SUPPLEMENTAL .TITLE REPORT Page 2 Order No. 460264 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE GENERAL TAXES: $1,619.92 • $0.00 $1,619.92 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.50 $0.00 $1.50 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 • There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since November 28, 2001, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of March 20, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. • • PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1345 MSU2 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TILE Compuy o(wuhinron.Inc. TO: Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street 215 Columbia Street Seattle,Washington • Seattel, WA 98027 • 98104 Attn: Dian Ref.# Bereiter SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #1 PNWT Order Number: 460264 Seller: Finseth Buyer/Borrower: Catholic Arch Bishop of Seattle The following matters affect the property covered by this order: • The following paragraph(s) of our preliminary commitment has/have been eliminated: 4 • Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the • property covered by this order has NOT been re-examined Dated as of December 12, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY By: Marilyn Sanden Title Officer Phone Number: 206-343-1345 KM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden (marilynsanden@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Bob Curtis (bobcurtis@pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Georgean Moore (georgeanmoore@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Debby Bigelow (debbybigelow@pnwt.com) Unit No. 2 FAX No. (206) 343-8400 i Telephone Number (206)343-1345 Pacific Northwest Title 215 Columbia Street Title Order No. : 460264 Seattle, WA 98027 Attention: Dale Your Ref. : Bereiter A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: November 28, 2001, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount $ 242,500.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 945.00 Tax (8.8%) $ 83.16 Proposed Insured: CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCH BISHOP OF SEATTLE NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: ALBERT W. FINSETH, as his separate estate 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. Order No. 460264 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 22, Block 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lt 22, Blk 1, Smither's 4th Addition to the Town of Renton, V11/P19 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 460264 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other, matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2 . Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. Order No. 460264 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. FORMAT: MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS ONLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OF NO MORE THAN 8 1/2" BY 14" . NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR WITHIN THE UPPER LEFT HAND 3" MARGIN. TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OF SUBJECT DEED OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR(S) AND GRANTEE(S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . (continued) Order No. 460264 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (continued) : 1. DELINQUENT GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 784080-0110-09 LEVY CODE: 2110 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $38,000.00 Improvements: $76,000.00 YEAR: 2001 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE • DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: $1,563.03 $0.00 $1,563.03 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 $'0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 PLUS INTEREST YEAR: 2000 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: $1,545.71 $0.00 $1,545.71 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 $0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 PLUS INTEREST YEAR: 1999 AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT DUE DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: $1,353 .23 $0.00 $1,353.23 PLUS INTEREST SPECIAL DISTRICT: $0.85 $0.00 $0.85 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 • PLUS INTEREST 2. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Albert W. Finseth, as his separate estate TRUSTEE: Chicago Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Key Bank of Washington AMOUNT: $48,459.00 (continued) Order No. 460264 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 DATED: August 24, 1993 RECORDED: August 30, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308302612 AFFECTS: Includes other property The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. 3. Payment of Real Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of City of Renton. Preseht Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.78%. 4. Title is to vest in Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a Washington non-profit corporation, and will then be subject to: Evidence of the identity and authority of the officers of Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a Washington non- profit corporation to execute the forthcoming instrument must be submitted. NOTE 1: The records of King County and/or our inspection indicate that the address of the improvement located on said land is: 321 Morris Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055. NOTE 2: ' Upon notification of cancellation, there will be a minimum cancellation fee of $50.00 plus tax of $4.40. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Kris Ebbighausen Any inquires should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. tas 41, 0 ,,<<thers 4th Addition to Renton Vol. 11 pg. 19 S e!-47 k/ 3/06 r IP . (!ea Ave.) 30 30 4 44 0 4 • 44 44 30 30 44 44 40 140 4f 41' a) 200 e °® o 1'‘.7 °o __ y`d,'TDo� frill ' !°o NA oN abdt I '�, 44 40 O .�[ act 44 44 4o 40 44 4 > �IMN N• r�i N Q • Z /� li • ILO o /Zo /, /Z0 0 3 7 8 �epoop46 Q ,Dts �3 : 1 e ay 044 lc 0.0.P4. 4 7 A . .soot•12 R9,7 p ►7�gh 23: ,,p� d Y 2 Q 9 ►004 Z Z : 9 ►p4D iy°I2 r W a . Al i�/0 05 7 / : /0 go- oi2/• a0Cr p2 Ih cn ° CO 0 - // 00 6D r ,°o�D'a0, . I, . 0 D .o i Z0: 3 . °o r• ccQ� o 3 ,' f pot J /6: 3 ' /3 '$°�° V 00000/8: h . z Q— La", . o`� .1. /4 :0 v ! Li Jo So ` Ito !6 ito • 30 30 ... Ito pO AID I. I o� D��6 3° 30 �...I...I••r• 1701.6.771 17.7.N7.7% S. FOURTH (f) ST. n s es-47w (4 /AM Av.) 40 40 h 4y /i 40 40 ,44' . 40 40 40 0. 40 40 • 40 61,,E S) 4 o 3,,'' 20,11e7 1. (o 5 4 3 2 / • o-- ♦n ep t SAP 4 01. F $ �h b N "edh 40 40 40 40 da °40 40 40 rco/.TJ\ 40 7 / o1P°yt° v.ipe CO J �° /8�° S 7 '0:"di bo�o-a-_o�/O, e > , _ ♦ 1 .Zo a 20 0y • ' At__./.. .. ........._ PACIFIC NORTE3'WFST TITLE Order No. 460264 N Company of Washington, Inc. IMP, R :This is nTANT "� 9 of a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate".the`land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No .liability.is-aassumed byreas° of reliance hereon. ,l ,At ors Y T. • • - x. (Y�` Ti S-1-' R l., '} -+A • _ •1 . ". tia•. . ::.. TRANSNATION April 15, 2002 Catholic Church Archdoises of Seattle (CCAS) Attn: Paula Property Construction Office, 910 Marion Street Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Order No.: 400-10030918 Title Officer: Nathan Warwick Buyer/Borrower(s): Seller(s): Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle Subject Property: 215 Whitworth Avenue S, Renton, WA 98055, King County Order Summary Thank you for placing this order with Transnation Title Insurance Company. If you need assistance on this file, please contact: Nathan Warwick (425) 646-8587 nwarwick@landam.com Chuck Reynolds (425) 646-8573 chuckreynolds@landam.com Sue Orrino (425) 646-8588 sorrino@landam.com 1-800-441-7701 Fax: (425) 646-0541 Additional copies have been sent to: Transnation Tide Insurance Company 14450 NE 29th Place,Suite 200,Bellevue,WA 98007 Phone: 800-441-7701 Fax 425-646-0541 Cover Page WA.09.01.00 . TRANSNATION • Catholic Church Archdoises of Seattle (CCAS) Attn: Paula Property Construction Office, 910 Marion Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Order No..: 400-10030918 Liability: $ 310.00 Charge: $ 310.00 Tax: $ 27.28 Total: $ 337.28 LIMITED LIABILITY GUARANTEE Subject to the Exclusions from Coverage, the limits of liability and other provisions of the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed and made a part of this Guarantee, and subject to the further exclusion and limitation that no guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation herein called the Company, • GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated herein which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. Dated: April 03, 2002 • 1"7:24eliZios' By Authorized Signature Transnation Title Insurance Company 14450 NE 29th Place,Suite 200,Bellevue,WA 98007 Phone: 800-441-7701 Fax: 425-646-0541 Limited Liability Guarantee Page 1 of 4 Wk.12.05.00 Order No.: 10030918 SCHEDULE A 1. Name of Assured: Catholic Church Archdoises of Seattle (CCAS) 2. Date of Guarantee: April 03, 2002 3. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: a. That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: See Exhibit A attached hereto. b. Title to the estate or interest in the land described above is vested in Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a Washington corporation pursuant to deed recorded March 23, 2001 under Recording No. 20010323000518. c. The estate or interest in the land described above is: a fee simple d. There are no taxes or assessments, mortgages or deeds of trust, real estate contracts, judgment liens, state or federal tax liens, or other monetary encumbrances which purport to affect title to the land, other than those shown below as exceptions: EXCEPTIONS: The following matters are also excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies or assessments on land or by the public records. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. All covenants, conditions or restrictions, all easements or other servitudes, and all reservations appearing in the public records or indicated on a recorded plat. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 1. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: 7841800090 Year' Billed Paid Balance 2002 $1,448.21 $0.00 $1,448.21 Limited Liability Guarantee Page 2 of 4 Order No.: 10030918 SCHEDULE A (continued) Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $1,448.21. Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Value Land: $125,000.00 Assessed Value Improvements: $1,000.00 2. Liability for supplemental taxes for improvements which have recently been constructed on the land. Land improvements are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls. 3. Right of the public to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills,upon the land herein described in the reasonable original grading of streets, avenues, alleys and roads, as dedicated in the plat. Note 1: Evidence should be submitted disclosing the identity and authority of the parties who will execute the proposed instrument for Corporation of the Catholic Archibishop of Seattle in accordance with its by-laws and pursuant to the discipline of the parent church with which it may be affiliated. Note 2: A satisfactory showing should be made of the authority of the officers executing the proposed instrument on behalf of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, a corporation. Current Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws should be furnished to the Company for review both for said church, and for any higher discipline or organization to which it is responsible. Note 3: The current property address is not available at this time. Note 4: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. LOTS 1 & 2, AND A PTN OF LOT 3, BLK 4, SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO RENTON DWB/amh Limited Liability Guarantee Page 3 of 4 Order No.: 10030918 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1, 2 AND THE NORTH 20.0 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 4 OF SMITHERS SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. THIS SKETCH IS PROVIDED,WITHOUT CHARGE,FOR YOUR INFORMATION. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROPERTY INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,AREA,DIMENSIONS,EASEMENTS,ENCROACHMENTS OR LOCATIONS OF BOUNDARIES. IT IS NOT A PART OF,NOR DOES IT MODIFY,THE COMMITMENT OR POLICY TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY MATTER RELATED TO THIS SKETCH. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO AN ACCURATE SURVEY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. SECTION: 18 TOWNSHIP: 23N RANGE: 05E •C/T y " '\ 3 �1 I N I O M :,v e°o°r^ • ^ , ✓°yob '�{�°w= : 7 i - OF i)�b b ti °� a ��(i ,►+� f� +j7� Cl) • SfgT4zii 2 mad°G� G fj�O.fi6• N y ' /� 1 , 00 - 30 3o T�f •,163 .� �b��k6 , t• v•'•-- . ,�,�p(p. '� sa yfDgp ,..~nil , „ 4 .s.6I ril M ta . .,^. Q ° °0 1t 'T R/VE �z` �`f N ; 2a.05 . - a a.o° sf R �p c w a .. t „ , — P/p J a 1Pa`\ 0 M : ' ..F /P y1 KO ` C/N f b 1�3.� ''1" % 3$ Z• (� ,6 .it :--) .I - `4 Its i FL_ 944•0 YHav c • a 1®, ot3 • • 0® s 'p $ ... -D a F f o 0¢V i 3 lip Na ,xo 5 4 ao '0'� ,�J.'/ - t"00 w 40.�to 2" 4 e i - - 7 1' "a1 I 01 ++ •II_ 4.i" ` �tnvfs�I-•0 �o �s s. ® `�+� 0 . ,' e' , 0 .1 o°r 3 ID' 0t o y4 e h °o i �F o 49 �° y e z e: A ; �} p ; 1 $ ,.•t,, a, �*y y h . •. e 0 5 Q 4 k (° 1y• 0 d •o• S4I te4 for?: 0ti• a^ /^ l4 J ,h1 % J$r, 074. Jo 70 ,� 9t •90 70 °J.I 2 3 44 34•7'^ i0\ d taa J• i0 737.4' A S. THIRD ST m s y•07s✓ sic (sra Svc) • ti (-oleo o sr.) A = w N 44 44 •0 44 40 Jo 90 {{-�_� 30 36 #4 41 ao I ar ac 44 Cl) G to S 4 3 a / G '' 4 a'#1- 2 / o ti e 44►+I 3 a4 / 30 so 5 �` d2 °o° oo►� t%y `•�/ P•'• 40� J IW1odh . °`� °' . 60 O .t4 44 a/ to WO as 4o o 0 �.i °0 ' eop1 4.ro --N a , A C u .� K c k. 4s I�t 4e Eo }a _ aR > 4 h Y,N N . 4 Co �ti°O„ k n 7 ,s o w 0 k 1 • �, Q-' iu i:® •4 im 0 is E _ • .�, " poy° //-1� �o,°'fF a$ 7 n°d'` •.•gj*o 2!� ; 7 t o' d gyp ; L..1 H• a 0 o :Zz t 8 co N 15' ui 3' 8 ,.m a i 91P 23. 4 8 a•�p44• •011% Z3 t . 8 L i1-y'>�', 9 e to• a, `'. 9 . 1p 0, 2; �. , 9 .r g •0°1 22 W : g o 4 ,a , o > o. -- ' : 0 . / :/o •a�,l40 ,.o a/: a. : /o M .1°�6 .•O 2/. 5 :/O Jet % /0 , ��_ g O. to o `'!i m l ao: : /i �• T ,�rto. . �i ,�o Q ..o O 20i ' // A c.., ---�-o . rr y yy a r. :/2 •V 1�8° 3 I2 �,of 19. c'E '12 ��°4 Z ,. /9° , i /ZN 0 ° F R co N ° :.: H '/3 too i ' 13 /oP°pp1 LL j /8: •IJ „�•�e Q , 1 18: n /3 4i 1p��u/_ Mspy I m�} •i� W/� i/+ .ie g ��ia ■ p�3 1 n Y „® :7: A"F� pp V/,io 17 _ /" 1 � �L�!b izo nt 3e !o �r '� .f ,N f m 1 �i / .+. .• .T_TIC 1 1: R• IL :Le •'.` ]0 3e O •/ �6 /2o af� ,. et: '+ �p0 S. •FOURTH U)) ST. " " 41 !____ sr s I!- 7W 0 OM/X. •+� 4 (O N fI + I ♦O 44 4• 4„ Ie 40 3 '6 n $6-U 4 w 3 2 ,1y7F . 1 ,, I 5 14 3 4 / I F Order No.: 10030918 • SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE establish the lien rights of the Assured.If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation,the Company's obligations to the 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided In Schedule A of this Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and whether or not shown by the public records. Stipulations have been provided to the Company,a proof of loss or damage signed and (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety(90)days after on real property,or,(2)Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of excluded under(1)or(2)are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the loss or damage and shall state,to the extent possible,the basis of calculating the amount public records. of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to (e) (1)Unpatented mining claims;(2)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts provide the required proof of loss or damage,the Company's obligation to such assured authorizing the issuance thereof;(3)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition,the Assured may reasonably be required not the matters excluded under(1),(2)or(3)are shown by the public records. to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and 2. Notwithstandinganyspecific assurances which areprovided in Schedule A of this shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and Pplaces as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all Guarantee,the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the records,books,ledgers.checks,correspondence and memoranda,whether bearing a date following: before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. (a) Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to Further,if requested by any authorized representative of the Company,the Assured shall any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to forth in Schedule(A),(C)or in Part 2 of this Guarantee,or title to streets,roads, examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and • avenues, lanes,ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to memoranda in the custody or control of a third party,which reasonably pertain to the loss maintain therein vaults,tunnels,ramps or any structure or improvements,or any or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the rights or easements itherein, unless such property, rights or easements are Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the expressly and specifically set forth in said description. reasonable judgment of the Company,it is necessary in the administration of the claim. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters,whether or not Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath,produce other reasonably shown by the public records;(1)which are created,suffered,assumed or agreed to requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information by one or more of theiAssureds;(2)which result in no loss to the Assured;or(3) from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any Judicial or non• governmental regulation,shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances to the Assured for that claim. provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims:Termination of Liability. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this In case of a claim under this Guarantee,the Company shall have the following additional Guarantee. I options: GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount d Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. 1. Definition of Terms. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the (a) the"Assured":the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee,or on a coverage of this Guarantee,or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or,if this supplemental writing executed by the Company. Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a tienholder,the (b) "land":the land described or referred to in Schedule (A), (C)or in Part 2, and Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property.The term"land" mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to reasonable attorneys'fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which in Schedule(A),(C)or,in Part 2.nor any right,title,interest estate or easement in were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, abutting streets,roads;avenues,alleys,lanes,ways or waterways. payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all (c) "mortgage":mortgage,Ideed of trust,trust deed.or other security instrument liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said purchasers for value and without knowledge. indebtedness,together with any collateral security,to the Company upon payment (e) "date":the effective date. of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for 2. Notice of Claim to be Given rby Assured Claimant. in Paragraph(a)the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to the claimed loss or damage,other than to make the payment required in that an Assured hereunder of any claim d title or interest which is adverse to the title to the paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or estate or interest,as stated herein,and which might cause loss or damage for which the prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for the Company,then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or cancellation. matters for which prompt notice is required;provided,however,that failure to notify the (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless Assured Claimant the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee,together with any costs, 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is the Assured is a party,notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or obligated to pay.Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in proceeding. Paragraph(b)the Company's obligation to the Assured under thIs Guarantee for the 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions;Duty of Assured Claimant to claimed loss or damage,other than to make the payment required in that paragraph Cooperate. shall terminate,including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. above: 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. (a) The Company shall have the right,at its sole option and cost, to institute and This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage prosecute any action or proceeding,interpose a defense,as limited in(b),or to do sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the described,and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability Assured,or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee,whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an paragraph,it shall do so diligently. Assured mortgagee,as limited or provided under Section 8 of these Conditions and (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations,at Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice(subject to the right of the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs,together such Assured to object for reasonable cause)to represent the Assured and shall with interest thereon;or not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel,nor will the Company (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated pay any fees,costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. (e) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as 8. Limitation of Liability. permitted by the provisions d this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, ten or litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly encumbrance,or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reserves the right,in its sole discretion,to appeal from an adverse judgment or reasonably diligent manner by any method,including litigation and the completion of order. any appeals therefrom,it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to (d) in all cases where this'Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for that matter and shall not be liable for any lass or damage caused thereby. the defense of any action or proceeding,an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding,and all appeals therein,and permit the Company to use,at its option,the name of such Assured for this purpose.Whenever requested by the Company,an Assured,at the Company's expense,shall give the Company at reasonable aid in any action or proceeding,securing evidence,obtaining witnesses,prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to CLTA Guarantee Conditiions and Stipulations (Revised 12/15/95) Page 1 of 2 WA.17.02.00;SC No.: 11727 Order No.: 10030918 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED 12. Arbitration. In the event of anylitigation the Company or with the Com an s consent,the Unless prohibited by applicable law,either the Company or the Assured may demand (b) by P Yarbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Company shall have no'liability for loss or damage until there has been a Final Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to,any controversy or determination by a court of competent jurisdiction,and disposition of all appeals claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, therefrom,adverse to the title,is stated herein, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee (e) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. written consent of the Company. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of 31,000.000 shall be 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect All payments under this Guarantee,except payments made for costs,attorneys'fees and at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the 10. Payment of Loss. Arbitrator(s)may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed,in which case proof of The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance loss or destruction shall be fumished to the satisfaction of the Company. Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request (b) When liability and the'extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee;Guarantee Entire Contract accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations,the loss or damage shall be (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the payable within thirty(30)days thereafter. Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee,this Guarantee shall be Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee,all right construed as a whole.' of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant (b) Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,or any action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to this Guarantee. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a Assured would have haddagainst any person or property in respect to the claim had this writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President,a Vice Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company,the Assured shall.transfer to President,the Secretary,an Assistant Secretary,or validating officer or authorized the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to signatory of the Company. perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in 14. Notices,Where Sent. any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. All natives required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured to: Consumer Affairs Department P.O.Box 27567,Richmond,Virginia 23261-7567. shall have recovered its principal,interest,and costs of collection. • • CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations(Revised 12/15/95) Page 2 of 2 ST . ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH (PHASES 1 AND 2) Renton, Washington Technical Information Report Prepared For: St. Anthony Parish ��cwA/TRECOv . RFI��NitjG Prepared By: E® Pacific Engineering Design, LLC. March 14, 2002 Pacific Engineering Job No. 00025 Technical Information Report St. Anthony Catholic Church (Phases 1 and 2) March 14, 2002 Prepared For St. Anthony Parish 314 South Fourth Street Renton, WA 98055 Prepared By Pacific Engineering Design, LLC. 4180 Lind Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 (425) 251-8811 R_ • i �, G A. /a /if (I/ 6)4 - c .�rl 0 jefil F,p \ ,, • f / - iI Fss, CI STOk G\4``, /pNA L E� 1b ; 5 az • EXPIRES: MAY 6. 2002 c I. PROJECT OVERVIEW This project is an extensive remodel and consolidation of the existing St. Anthony campus located in downtown Renton between Shattuck and Morris Avenues,north of South 4th Street. These first three phases of the multi-phase master plan includes vacation of a portion of Whitworth Avenue north of South 4th Street, construction of a new social hall,kitchen, gymnasium,locker rooms,additional administrative space for parish and school staff, additional classrooms and meeting rooms, on-site parking and student drop-off areas..The existing off-site social hall will be demolished and replaced with parking and upgrades will be made to the existing rectory north of the project. Church/School Site: Grading operations will include setting finished floor elevations for the proposed school additions, grading proposed parking area in relation to those finished floor elevations, and providing positive surface drainage to collection points while matching existing perimeter grades. Storm drainage improvements will include new catch basins and 12-inch diameter pipe routing surface runoff to an on-site water quality facility prior to being discharged to the off-site public drainage system in Shattuck Avenue. Water main improvements will include upsizing the existing water main in 4th Street (along the site frontage) to 12-inch as well as looping a 12-inch main through the site. New fire hydrants will be installed as required by the Renton Fire Department. Sanitary sewer improvements will connect to the existing 8-inch sewer main in the alley west of the church and include an 8-inch sewer main extension into the site from Shattuck Avenue. Along with these improvements, a certain amount of existing water, sewer and storm drainage infrastructure will be removed from Whitworth Avenue and the alley west of Whitworth between 3rd and 4th Streets.Also electrical,power,telephone, gas, cable TV and other dry utilities will need to be relocated accordingly. Social Hall Site: Once proposed work is completed at the church/school site,the existing social hall at the southeast corner of 4th Street and Morris Avenue will be demolished to provide additional parking. This new parking lot will require storm drainage and water quality improvements in line with those proposed for the church/school site. A system of catchbasins and a water quality facility will be designed and connected to the existing system in 4th Street. Existing utilities (storm,water, sewer, electrical,power,telephone,gas,cable TV) serving the existing social hall will be removed, capped at existing service mains, etc. as required. Offsite improvements will include providing new curb cuts and removing existing curb, gutter and sidewalk as necessary.New pavement will be required in parts of Shattuck Avenue, Whitworth Avenue, Morris Avenue and 4th Street where new utility improvements and grading (Whitworth Avenue only) are proposed. Rectory Site: The Rectory Site is located %2 block north of South 3rd Street on Whitworth Avenue. The existing single-family residence will be remodeled to provide accommodations for three priests. Existing utility services will remain. P:\Project Files\00025\0025 drainage report.doc tifl. 11.Tik • •• ,4 4.dii. f•- 1' iii 0 44 1 Ft .44 4,111 of I 13 14.- .. LI , ,1....1 ti ,. 1.1 ,.,,,, . ti- 4-1, ili•• 11 . _ i•! ,,,1 11.1:7.r :,..: .,, ,,,.: A i..., (I rk:.:,'r, II:ti' Sel, 1;1 - ETIWIN FintairaalletiMMIligga. ,.: I .3 .. , COPYRIGHT 2001 aftluatTim NW® --- ---.. ,.....•,:.. 7,6u.s:. ...40.-...7i:.,:iic:S11 ':F...:d.- - ',..... .::).::::. ..5'.Inir.,,ii-417.5.?'ts-:!:'# ...._ ... ,,, ... ....: tr) - •.• , ..,..i.,.-:,.4,-.-g•-_-..:•••••:.,1,,,.-. :,..: -.,'...,....1... ..., TI:...,...:-.,.,..? •,.•..,.......,,,.:; -4.1it • = 304!•••• -.‘ n 1; Attr::7•;':i2 a,,.-:10:,-.,:::,. ... .,;',:',. .k:',.:!--:'-':i.i:,..y....'tc.;',).-:.:1,:,.!TtLi .z„gni .fl,z:1*. . 7,.,i.t., ; . .: •, :„.., ,,R-.....:.,.. ...•.... ....-..,..,),...„,•,0 ...., ....,:•,, ,. .E...1 3s Ay Hitt, -..7:-,,:tv, 1.11 Air III r7,, 1,,,,, tis ld HIM 3s •1,-.1 ,...6.:,::,•.-;.:'.. .:l•-•••:A.. ii:••';:•:,.*:':;: ... '. •':. --,-;:"..../--, .',.'q'.... .....",:'...'.4 •'is.-,,:e. ,..f.-'.::-.:-....:::.•;••;;Y' ,•:.,':r.1`. -:''.:.:',•.-- ' '.•.1.it,..: la;1.1 _ 1,1,-- n id WU iu A Ai..,e:;..,.:!1(0".'•:fil::;,,,, ,,.,...::::.:-....,:!..,:.4 .;,?..\,..6:,... ;,::!,,,,;-:1,::„,:g,4 :,,.. .:.•;;,y,p-cfs.:4,-.:-.:7:.,:i:.-:-: -,<,/.:: :,;":,::1.:.--,.tz,-i4,:..., :it Ar.:. 3S Av ETT 3S AV.F'''' HIETIE ty, 3S sr., :/-_,:: .,:c."-A:,,,....A-, .-,-;,., .....,J.!.. ..i,.!i,. te ..., • . . . . .. -7.1:. • :0". '-4. '1,-..1`Cs'tio;'''-::::-..,::',.-•13:";'. ...,'-:,. ':.-:: :. . 4,1")". .:•'•4.--':".',N.,,, •.:,.:'....'!-',.--/;.::.- - .r. ..A'- .'' ',A.-' !•.-?..: -;:!::7:1-.:7:,;?,'"':;,.A.b: •••• •lak•NrWp-LI ''' u" • -• -•••••• ' Ali L:•••, ---N.s aA-..4 ..,-..:2.:.:::......,?:;4.6), ..•-...,•,:.'.•,:...::,-.6•!...•.:-: \ /..•:Li...„.....-----,..,,,a.g,•,;::.-,..:., • 'i•e!..'!'igN•-:,..,t/': .:.. :-.":'..'. :'!..<••• 11,......,,,:'• •-:•7:-r,..,nr.1-1-_L- ;s'AY ith-Tf F„ ,.ki \ 3S AV HMI 141i",i1 4i•Itiebill04, ff0Stot:-.:'7,r;-, .: ).',..,,4..3N s:,.1*.‘:•':'''''::''r i.e•..,,dy'/:-.7-.7:'-•: vi''-'••!:•:::••' ..• •. :... . .,. .:...: . .•'' ; -4.21t11311111&b., ..•••• :;•"T".' 71.1._----",..-,---.- .., .,-,.....•:.;:.••7::,4-....r.,.';;;V#Iiimrrai-•'-''';tr • -..:- ..'";-....:,•:.... -- .•• .•,' § ,:•$:' • ..::.-.--,• .: ,:-!..-..--.,••,;4-•AY'S.',1(8,... .•.• .::::.:•'''•.1...:4• • , ..3i:14 , ,. • :k Tesi,„„„now :. ..A,.. • ••-•..,:••:-;.:.:••,--...-:•.:.•-.• . .. . •-...t. •. • ...,...;;..--..E.:'..,..,Is 12.8, .......3s.---1.0 ••:: is•Il'' al •-• 4..:•.4. .n 03'k,. tp,. 1 s Ay HMI .qr.it :,El ''•vpv••.:-.Ns-.i-1-1 -••:.=3ti:,.••...A'•FV,,..... I -.•!•••.-::•••: ;•••,•-•t:r.---.•:,.- -.„ , • 6,,,,-. •:.:.:: ::., ........... -•::./.,.... 73g '-. , cm ,5 R o 7,--41.1....:1....:--..:-. : ,.., ' • ' ) .....--4'..',":!. ..,,..i.o.v... ,:..,.:.::. 1 ' ' :..:"...-',..:i..?:,... .7.'.'q.'• -,....‘. . .....,.. / •. .. .-...:-;.•..,;....••*/3113 iiI`..s,„.7.,,G44 '301 /2 t '.'DI.'.:•.: 1.60/. ;:!'i54 •-•:,e•-•sti:::-....AM..•..'s.-.. .2.,7---, • "-•'-',.'„'z'. .."--..'. -.:-Z: v,.•:i,"-.-:.1 •. ---.,.. ?. :'-.1"%:•:::,:•:t?..•:'"E::7':. •, .:.•.......•: : ':,...c:s: :;....:-.....6,.':"' ".51-::''.cr..... .r.4:1 s , „ :1 ::! ': • "' " ''''"Mt.•- 4; ;',,....:-..i:::1:1'.:,-2.:,,':-.'.'..:'.-:::.':-..- ' :-.:4•41-.0'-"--V,' ,,,,Z14.91:4;':''-."--':":-..‘;''',..::''' :4'.7`'`'l':•,'••••''''''115;‘?':•-•'=;: ....w*;-•• •• '•'.'*: . •..•i':N'.;..::•:•-:....'*i.‘ :,. -: ,SE• , •.'',:-,:: 7i6CII 11:6°;r '91;011 ' 111-8:2 I--:tt! -• •• . ' • 4,78 *- : *;!,-, . .,7: ,::c:s*•7::•:::.'..j:E-I4 ..;,;;.:::: -;-!**:.:.'.'•• ..:.:: ..::., t ,:)-:::: ::i.•i**:•.,;,:1-:••-1 Sy' v.) 3t - 2:4'i',..'....:?,..:1:::'.".,':C...::•.:::.:::'....:".1'•:.;'..;:..:.:•': .' , 1'`jg.1-11. --'1. ..-•;.:.....':•:;-.ii,T'if.:',1;!:i --•':!.--.A0.,1.4 Imo''" .' '- ":*..- ..:::i:',.:.!:.,r..;,.....:"... ..,...,•,. ..:,..........:: ,::-..'. .:i,4.:.,:: .1,,:::-,...:... cr 4 . C:30\1 F ,!1:,./ ,Eis flak, ill or w 10 V-vsc- 3S ld • ;,,, • ::::•;:-..„.:!. ..f.. ,.,.... ,.:,_-.4E1 „.._-- :,,_ --..1.-. \.r. .,/, •..,. . .. .. :ini ,MK ...-.-.:_.•..: '. '.GRANT''''."'. .... . ::, ..: ...-•'...•. - .,...'•.:.,f''';.l..,::.t:.'•?::?!' .•• Mali ''' / 3S9 Ca\HIS°I i.,'• •.....j,-r."::"•'.:.•'...f:•:'..........'•.:.' '..•Eradiaing.3'.'`...... ' .::•''..; .1 f• ,.•.. •:.,..:::,:t:'.•••.4•••,.. lial 7'7;:....:......4nP:,:..:,:.::.....;:•••:.:....:•.4..: ...2...:...:::.:,:;.,....:''..y,,,.. ::', ,....:..'‘,4,,::1•::In.. ,..- uraingir4.-. AV/11.501 ., life•••' :::''.'3-''•..-'• •:.;,Olf:SalialliZARIMV:,-.tN's",:',,''-1,-'. -.'..-:.:.,-'.',',,'!1Vi:..,', Frurali'i4-...,....' .".....:,.;::: .::::4...--:: i•.'...... .'„„-,..- ... iiigni,i'.---.. 7.4 i`.MSc.41%/..:.;:::k,-8' ,:rio•Ec Mauls; ....,•- ::l':;:.',9-1.... .i,„.___,...00t•-•-',:-.',..,., .-..,,-•..':7 mnsurheia:: :...•• ,;:::. ,•:.....;,,,,,it., .7sllIlligki\ AY.,•:J..,-:Eilim-,t,••,:.. . . ,imminsi '•:.pswourrm,„--7--„..0,,,,----.--- --77.1861.1a32-,.::7.vant-tiffili•. :,uvc133.;:---:..,.,- :::.:F:,-:;.:).':':yt77.i.0001:-.: :4,-,„,-iw.':.,..::W.,-:' .,..... ;.::e -1,: rt-,;:l ..., :.,:. : . : .... . 4 ,.... .K....„,,..........,,,..>:, ,......, .........______,__ _._..„, :::...,,...:;::.,:.,...,.....,::,„,,...,:,..,.,:,:„...::.Ii.p. ..J7?*: ,..-:-,:i,--;:-.:: '4.,...- .•••••.:.:•••••-•':-. , 7.•::.:.:,,. :•.-,-- .. - ,.. 'it ts ;:;,n, IiiiiiiifiNNimairp :-‘I- ::.(4113EjlinfialantiO:Pli.k1P.F.Sk.......:.-RD,:•-..j.!......S.LL__-.. '-,,--L---. - .... „.,.7.-.7.-04. ..i.:_..•:'v,.....,r.:-: :....:: ..,...:.....,:,.; ..,;::::.,........,..... ...... : .: 41‘.9 ... .„ ' ralassrpiin 1 '41 12121RiiinifigiRr..- 411167,04,.,1111,kmrtotitiawkagai\--..::',.;\;•: % --:.±:.:--.:..1't 5 II :'6.:ft-t . ..`...,..j 1'44.-'-k.:PN.•','t_Ai:...:.‘.1.V.i.q.uu!•q:,:. t'4-''''4V;•-•:::''A'. *.:..,.. -: s '-..t$ ,,kg).:'•,•L' •:....?1,.::::-::: •;: l's --,..7N„,_ ,..:.1„,.. ...tis..,r ......-_,. ifiv.-„,,,illitlie - -.'•-:7 :s:',' •rf. ' -IA"'.....:••••: 11411EV..,.7-1'';i .."4. 1-...- -:••;,"., •.......,..,,,?i". •.s, ,•••• •,•:,.. .:-.,•-•.A...„.„., .--- • ,. t.-, rvt., za.-2:11 ..,:... 1:911,: • ::".....9%)-' ' 4... ..''' ''''"'''''''''''''''''''''"t'.:C:1:1'''''';'- '4,-•t$ . kt714k11151... ....•:-.....=cc.:'\\'' vEL17777-fi"'''''''''''' P iiiii.,,- "..:4-.A' •-:.'!,:.:!:i:i py C::1.'"A '''.43:`A......':•'ii,:`.-..1. , ' ::.::...-..,c;;•.:.' •'11301120;ii.le w ':::!, .:.:',.-;•••A••-•:-',,,•:-11:•:'...,. -:-'':•:;'-':--- • --, •'•`:k'4'".'.:Se:.:.*:J•:'': ..'e•-',5• •laglariii-Ailliihre.::.'•-•••6 •"•:',:li4:•V". '-'*rai-Alfirhi•'....-MEL ' -Arlandii.r.11t,-...2,...7.i .......;.....:'. .--, . ;t ,,...,.,., ''..,.•-:': ';•4110.,...-.......;' ...• -: ..:. .-.V tg Ki li.;-;'1-6'-r.`.:':'-..-.-_::-,-.77,10:11;i:t.:;:,I.v. ,::;-_-.-,44-4-i;lirigei-l*::s.pAgi.IA ..;:T.-.T,-: ''.-1 7'''...i...:14 ,•,:t4:3Eins....,Trairx,..-4L1, -,wr:,i,:::1:.inang,,I...;,..i.--;::::-,_;,...t,t44:-,f_2-, illsvAlli74.,''':::.':-..-`7-.. '. 1.11. it ,.-.:::.- -- ....,.,,, ,-::::-,;t::-.-...:1.'c'-ic4 .‘:''',Iii'g;t77'''''2:111/E-,,ifi'' '.... \•t2: '''"'.:'..- --....0461:--7-9.:•-•::',;,''-ii.:;,1 \ . .U3.017::.-PiAti]..1,"•::• -vn•lAi:4•M•:,...'-;.!11.1J+;!;4,4;';',;irkiiiiti':1q.'.::Q.-2:":t V.:11:,....`•1-,. •-•.':.-.... •2.-.. .t14. 1/4154 URT -....::::''''zi'i' .5:lig.i...,,.' '.1,,,,,is. .....-77.r,--n-,...,,,'•"„1.,..:::,:,..;4110LEcaiL..._Ito:.;:: :.111461 . imr\:".". i.. ..,:l.;,;:.,:lif,,.,„-, : 1:1':•....,?,::4,:14.,y.'....'..-:;;:t.:. l'ylt9C::.3*?:',..`..it:::',.f.,-.:::;:,-...,;: i ,:*4::___....:;faiir,er::.:,..7:',..;;.,.....,.; '1::.:: ..:. ...V ili,,. WiftVill=P-12551',.. jm-wl 6 : Etb:W:f;4.5241.'''.1 ----q-:44VAIAli‘" ...;it.'. 11V,i';':-"'"'::-.A":..'9f';'-'1:' '' .- r2:fail*: ';',,..*:'TZfri- ''''-'-:*'•:'*:-.1 . .'ii:* ,."*'24'.:*1*T'51::-L-__:__L--,----------„ :....-:.7., -•%.".'11'*`-*24'. ''- " .. .•.: .:.; : •.0. klilVaV. ,,tiii,:.,7" ... .•-;••,', t,_-,-.1044?,.,,,• ?;.S.'ir-'1Y71,.," i-,!,'4•PM1 * i',;',:.-.,..;it:::flialliNgiliksi.: \-:;:.:,:l.:7,13,:-. -' .... '"'t::...tsoc+i;;-.:.'...4:'.?;....z.*r=1:-F.:1.:: -i...f,,,..,..-...'• .......,...,7:,...,:,..c.,.c.;?:.,,....,.-.,.,:zi.....,"...,..,:,:.:,...,:i. :A:A:,,,...,,.,..,,ii..,.....- .:•...-___ ...,...,. .., .., ....... . .. ...______ .. . .;,;.i:,&,?.42... , .:.f.i"...c.1.. 3';.:n;.j.;.:t'll.t.;...-.7-1,_- ..!•, . .t.i-til,:'-..''.at, a ',:,,Ar,LLEy.::.3';.,...,'.__--------'''.:_.„.....-;.;;„--*-0'.:'4 ..t..E.,.. .,::a.4.:::,:,:.:;f::(75 : :,,,;-....),,:::,..:::.,,,--,,..,,;:.-:::.,.:-1...:..... ,.:.::.::-Ip..--_-'---f'-'-, - ",7,,,'":::g2ig'.71;,i,.10iitatiO',5 3_•tink4.7!4)Y-1',47..AC,ii' z,11 ici..4").','"":1 ....''''''.. ..4..;.10;:',';,),:,..f.. ....W:1;.______\:',;?-..:::.-„_NA,t.I.W-_-_-4. i 1--.' _- - ------':,-.*._:,::-::',-:Y:j .'i';''.7'r ';':''''''''''' ''''''''7":;.'lf:'''''.:.'..z::-:•4 g'..- •''''''"';'7'::-.7.,•..-77 '•.,: --:---:-<:".--,. -..:'..: -f"IP-i.iiiill..,':‘',:••11'',AV.;',1C"s''''';-t_-:.A-r"-LL:21'-';-'`. .'--'' ..11--t-::;‘,k,VV,t,-0A''',.:.W,- 24-1,7,...-'!..C.\:!.,,e,-•-; thlre-1--71....:::: ?,-7"..i.::..f.'..;; •;:.,•,1-',i••i:f.0,.‘f.A .:::: :',1.:';;::‘.-:•: ;.-:=:::"•:. ..;:', ;:-:;.;;;:-a:: ,'-;;IA-7..:f.,':::: ::?...::.,...i.:..,::.:.:::.,...-: i'',..• .,1 4..4''1,;.ir______---01 '• ' Eift-irMtr: MI i fa MI '...,.:i•h..0-r:''. , :.i.''.'-'1 ...,--‘1:*!: ','-'' '.1')..-,:•• .1',-•. W Fdrtif.: ::.!.....;',:•" .'..:';'.i'•••:;.!i.;::: :: 4;44';',41;'gl 13;::.'. f.*.'••';•••••WL:'•1.'. ::........................... .. ..•;::4.:•;.:.;:•:.;:.''':.•' ''•:.. '..1" ''.--;.--1 '.:•PliatZfri 4. ...--''., • ' :k'4'....r. -z,44,41 1 ritiat,-.44:4,,,Z ,4,... ...4','•.:•••:1-.4:•;. "4...7.'t::i';' '4V:".4..•'...•'••••••-:. :.‘•!.:.•::-.••.e4: .:',:.. '''-'..i4.'i:.f:t.:3,•••;:':%e:).•7•1::.'i..'..:..:•:;-,4'.,:.•:'-: ::•;; ;CT, ..!;•:.....•••••y:.i'-'4.....:..:..41:4::.:4:::. -; . - • ,:i.,i iVe..if..'`.v'S,.!!1•1•:.;41kg,..1.:*%I:NEgillPi....4'cr.*. ,iZ-•8 ''•-.1" .` 4..);•:: :1',Itt0..4;•'''.. '':...'": ':•;-::I -'..' '''.-,'": i •-,••yri'''', '''.:::;',..7.!.'.,,,-.:: -4.‘;,•'.,-.,„..,F-3::,....,..-,: ''''''"; •:'')''''';'''''''''''''•'-'•''',','''i--''''•'' ,....••••••••••••••-•• •-.--: -......mr,.-• ...,,...„..,,,.,„,,,,.,„...., .." .„_ _,...„,,,,'''': • a p;...^_•7 '' '''' 9`.'...;•,-r:'it.,..• r•.:ik.irr ,i:;;:'•.• '•.6'''''11§•Y'gr•• .4,94,...,,,,,;-,'•i?,:t.--,...!.....:-:-_,-,::: •..,:',:..,;,-;,'.- -. .--;,-..,..,.._;....c06,.- :.-..,., .: -.. : -immr..: . --2.:-... ---I-L-'2 ,'. .6.tr..:,..-: ,.::....;,::,,.::„..:,.::;._pi,-,:.„•..,:::.,, ..•.,..,,,,.,.:.,.:. .::,;.,•,..,,..,:„. • ••,...:::.,ANric. -.:.• --4.-1117. \mai .11 •'.,,.i ...,;:':•---:,:::::1::::::;,-,-,:', .,,7.:;,.1 ...7.,••,:'A...':••23.:-.'-,1.iJi:$ia.i.r.y....f,;-.,:-'.?•-f,::::.,•:::4;:ri:.:::•-•„.-..•:;:cg :,,-.:.'.. ,,,:i.,..:::::,, 4..:,,,:,:.;,...-i...-:.. .,.... .: :.,..L:1-..s.,,.. , -! AlliaFfirkIZE.Witi,. ,,,*11‘ .. 5,- 1-1--:mv, ..,w,;.,?.:-e•I iit.•:!'••;ii‘i...; .3'.- ma-...1 1,4';q.,---z••• -....'.,:---•-•:•••v.:,-::••••-•,,c, ,,,,,..,-;,...--... ''':',3-2,-!').('-,.,3-,'?•;x:: .'-‘:',...::.:!..-:!-?...-,.....,-.,,,.::•:," '',,- -' :'..' .- egaffiFe...-,::;1?4:::-'''';i. •6'''''.1111004„,•.' J. y. ..„....7.,i- :....r.3.1.1,4 -.!.=.::::::.!,:.. titili,..„4„.,;„;:,;:.:...:.:;..y..,..t.i.....ez:..i,7.c34..:•,::;.n.::.,A..,,A..,..t..-:;,,14,.4...;;•-v .,;',.:.,,. :!•:,.;:k...::‘LI,J;..;E:::1. il-e:.,,::,,•.2,4:,:;.,g -..„,...::... ..4._,..1,i t."-. It.-5.1.‘:Y•1'. .9'‘I..."•,4'.:''''-'776‘•-•••"4.. ''' :10 -' f•'" it,' :'''7.-,Th'; 71-!4-' 'Z"1 '''.::.:1.:! :?-•:.%*:1 .:::11.41,, ON'.,. ys.,0,L•••••Iftlil'44.:,,iii...;...?-;+_.......;i7j:•72,;;:.,...,,iLY:-.;:.,:•;.,..:„:.!...,-,-....".„.:.;*7,i.;i.i.,...........,:.,.._::.77-''.::„...:ff.7.-:-:„.,,.; :;,',..:'.:21.:. ,',::::•:-...:.,;:,:•,.!...•71....atic"AllS" V,,;ti..,...:'•:, „4:;-:1 '_ • --. P..'14:4i.!''' .*I-1, .!.-W I •••'"--r• e- , 4 . ..:1, 41e.. .„.ilito,/,:4:3-.WA?z,..::..',..::..'.•,..,..)4••:;:r, :-. ::_i• ‘1..;,..3ki....?,1 ..--.1: ,'71:-_::.,.:4?'.....','..;- ",i..:: .....,!.1i;.40,:?!M...-Z.41 ....:-.. ..'.'-'.;i:A!.'1...*!-...'...:.....-7.1..-v....1"; ::;...;'...!...:':-.-V.I.. :'..-'''..‘•:. ..' . :. :-T",'.1 .::,;,..;-..;.4.,:i:'- ,.....://,,.24't Al.:.:.:'.'.. ;'-:.•-•-:77.-.77j 7:':::'% '''.4 lb'' '''.:-......-.;-..:1:4(i.z.f.:?...'-,:,....:•*...7;C':' ,Z.''..'- '-'.:1:.:'.:::.:.r.;.::'''''.::'g....;','::.-...:'-':, ...:,:. :i-.F.:7.- :7..1.'7..'.:.. :-: -.:•••:': 4 ... 44'. -. ' - SliV7'.0..' ane - •' '. '-'.'9!F i . -vd:.; ..:.: .7: - ' - -,---,1 .e.:1;.,,80; Try• - I x A 4. •.1 * ....,,......-;•:;.., ...-::::-..,..:.:..:-,... \..;.,f,cil, .,-f:-.;I1 •-, •:--',:-.-•.',f.-,,:-. -....'.-..'-.:;';.. : .:.,,,:.;•,-..t•:.: .;.:-• .', • I'.. ..' . , '''*''• -•.: :•.•••.:• .•'..:••••.• ••NAcia. -.; ' .: ;: :- :".,:i,,,„,,4 ...301.1': h.:.....:,.. .-:-.: .•...- ...,,,...:,..:.,........ -.15: ..,.:,.....:,;,..1,_ ..:. -• • 4 ehe I :....• - , s AV•H•37.111P' ,2"` 'W." :gitagNiti -gal .„;;;;Ak ,A. .':,• -.. ,.7...,..-::.:..:.,,;:.:,:•,:,„: .-<,..•..,..::,.....s.:.7,:g, ic:::: -:.;,!. - Ms TWOSB)fyo , IF ' -. .-.---1.;.'-....-,''...,-. 1,• '--.J -.- • I , - ,-,iv lima. ,11A- -:•:- - tile s ,,Bilir.. ...or , m. . . ,,...... ,..:„......„.....,c, .........4.,..„:„....,.. ._.,..,......., ....• , ._ dVI4 999 33S LO LC) • . • • FEHM61167gal° ... kiitiggriMgegataNi I • 1 . • South 2nd Street T-1--_......_____ __ : T .. ...„,.., r----, „....... . St Anthony Rectory ' (yid` 216 Whitworth Ave S �7"�POW ------,_, • Renton,WA 98055 �.. • PROPOSED RECTORY SITE 1 --] m FSouth3rd Street (3 --I -TT-F—;- a m • Proposed Whitworth I o .y CAMPUS PLAN TO PROVIDE . Ave ROW Vacation oI PARKING FOR 210 CARS • .. TOTAL IN PHASE I IC a). oa � uI su. i�=F_ _ _ PARKING FOR 126 CARS TO 'mini ra ;Ft 1 BE PROVIDED IN PHASE I , • P• ' . , -- St.Anthony Parish =''-41 — rt,_ 314 South 4th Street [i�].i . — EXISTING CHURCH Renton,WA 98055 : -ram. - South 4th Street _ EXISTING SCHOOL PARKING FOR 85 CARS TO BE I Campus/Vicinity Plan ID PROVIDED IN PHASE I T, / Proposed Phase I and II Development (REMOVE EXISTING SOCIAL North ° ea 1d0' 3� HALL&WOOD STRUCTURES) ArcMtecture Plaruiing St. Anthony Parish T� - rma 314 South 4th Sheet Rutledge Maul Architects Renon,WA 981355 • August 16,20O1 . J • 1 it -C -2n (..) I 1 f• l'• -- olz:.'ll'ici;ii!:17;i7 4.1.44.1,...... southd-Sfreet•-i •,, ..t-----N. '. ,, -I„ r1:1Ti.: ;I:P.,,j1:,1':.:v Frl;IR!i i • - • •• D -----1 -C !.r..-• , -, : .. ...-•-• 5,01.tiv• \_...._._. ..--" .. 03 C.) -----............, Structures 41. a —• -----...„......... I o Perez Soc151-.5.1.5551n5Roors.Comeau, 55.0 0,,..1i1 Mint/155s&IC5541555t9555.555-. 0 :11.%"•" S.• "5 -............ ----...._.....,.. -----....„....4...' Ul! / -'4.j.., .. • Ei Wow C55555555 ord WNW 5.15 n ;.,......, illi.., 1P.4 ..... ...3 .../ - 44'''' "-------......2.:RC".----11 ,-------• Parking Summon, 744 _C `4 ra.,_, i.• taq 0 I• t;4?;ir'. --- : , ;.,-" '; ; : . 1 lioetacy Peurg IA Schcol Pay555555 Z 55 , ''''" •", \ •• !;1 I•iii Iv . • 5..' i •••VS--' I Proposed 1 ers,..us US •5 P.ii A C) a . .. .• , >, 1 i .z St.Anthony Rectory Dopand 5.1.55.515Palre* TOM Est raPatra • 1• 0 4 c)g >, • •••• ::::q: -4 PHASF I MIVIPI RION , ; ‘5,..„ 215 Whitworth Ave S MN i Renton WA 98055 —41,41.1ce./.-ell.C.• • 'trinenCC"."10":*•11,1't'll4•PC:147 .;°.... c -6' • •'• '4.','' ..---11.4.; . . „ N................,.........,......-... ),,,,.c.,,,, ...) !,1 ir.r - read.roo nenn mac .1 . •ss 'NAN;1: •._ ..!.,„;;_:! 11 ,4:4 • . 70 _ I • 1—.-S°tIftt-8. . -1- I 1,5• . ! $ $ rd Street. .. p 41..... • 'I Li RI \ L.:---,.nr:,oe.. ' .r '' 4. . i ' S. -- . • . i. • ,,, .... . / -I-: t• '44! ' .. .....,:4!, , : ! 5 • Cr) c2 t 1: • • - • 1 1 • . • ., . IS`• ': ; ---11 i Proposed Whlworth Ave,. i II .4' 13 vir, ilt ! : ; ROW Vacalien : .. '..... . . P Z5 I: '9-.,,, . -F—L Ilimier't::.*.. •• '• 1 ' t O. 2.I: :I; II •"--- .... "'"""'" i o's'P,',..t r r — f - i7PR if 0:is: !I •dt 1 ' a: '"' )/-.-- : < , 4•;:gi•Pet:st(''''' I E 1111 d " I'N--• • / '''.."‘•"...> -c: ,s; t J. ttrg•ne.,•••Li-I-"' -"4:r'-',':- N..,.... 'tr:.;,..:4.i.---'-'11 ....,• 1: f ' • ,• ••: ; , ; •--..... -- 01 .,....,:.c. ,, „ 7 ,,, .4 . , , -,. ,...- . ....,:,,.,...„1, N el V . . ' .N.-. N! litifs:S:::i.0 . .•n.e',';,, ••„•: ii 4110 .....M1- `-- i!f:!! li. 00 i , - i i „ '-.." : .:. 1 •014'. - :s-. • - ..••. • ,..ipii,, , ; : ., ..... ..-...-T.- .•th-dttratr:- • k...., I— V*;\ . r , ...,...„...„,,-,- -1 Existing Chisch . i ..i. ... .• Existing SchoOl 1; 1- "..... --• •-- •••'• , St.Anthony Parish ; 314 South alth Sheet Renton,WA 99065 . ;; •p.2.3A ••'•- Existing shuctures to be IL•14%." -. • re placed by Parking ii ...',(•- --•-'. • • ._.tZ4C° ' 0.• .... . ... .. 1-•--- ,. .A....- II --,'•'.--- nowt/ eft L 'cX', ' . • II . ' ..... ..1:61 ' •••••••rclar • * • • • • • ••• • . •••• ••• — ------- Vicinity and Phasing Plan • - - • 0 c cc ------- •••• -- •• . . •-. •• • SE Lot Site Plan Proposed Ph nd ase I ar. II Development 0 c .m.1".96",, Kurn sent. .• I I r t t 1••:,17",:-'- ..i----- .../..,•:-.••• \-......60 &T.0. • IST,E74.-..•°••°I‘I I ..--,,,,,' /••• • . •'I •• 0 I$ 1 ...• .. ....-t4INIsES TO ADJUST PEOPESEAKITST1401,1HEE00.•••••1•••,10.0••••••,...0..........0........-••••••••••••ItI•/0'.•T I./0 0 I I ..I ° ..,Da.w...1:0.•. / o. E. •••• WDEN EXISTING&LENTO 24,17 TOTAXWIEMIc....-. S :WIDEN EXISTING ALLEY TO 24 R.OW. .1 li, ", .....'- ..• WISING AL EV 20'P.O.W. • A ...• ..0 i „......,....,_ ....3,,.....,.. .., EWE?art an ED t.: X,". f ..d. "1-----; . ..- .' !t C.) ...) .} \ • \P.i >...... .4- (.....) •. . .,•If IN': . . lOst.'0'A 1 01 -- ..c it ...“,.. ffill. •*. 1...+IVI'Ip,i c',; .. \ EXISING ausngs 1;.. . . 0.0 dasattaa FOAIMIEcussi6ous . 4 a lea.m.6v .. _8 , , OW asii 0 .0..: • '...... ••.. a a 1 1 : .; ! , • :.--°1-C) .. i . ;; 1 , •----", 3.OA. , -0'44 I : • I 1 • •Iq= ••I 1 ; I• •1 No ...:0 AL,,.... NI : I'djI di 4'41. ,,.g.X.?.I.Mieffatis ;V. ....... I .. - ----;.... E I .. . ar X • ot .1 !,... ;,..; \ , -• z.-.2;,, . 4 •.......• ;,.:?:.;-..,1., 10%, . ..4111•, .1 I 1441 C)C3 i , ti.i-im„4, • ..i r Ritt..fill r '- ,---- .„. „. ,. ----•..... ./ ... I ''T.'''' 10e ITC . I :!..'I..1.•.0_ 4•1,40,..7.,:••44VII i 4 b >,04 8 ,=.. - V4,•A*.t.tte 444,.t•IYI 1 ..„0 1•-: :i PacAlm"QcomaAcire .. a i ai .0:•?...-, c --=-----4 1 I PLAYAOUND&PARIONG 1 0NINIIn FINE LANE i Ed119 CAE'S AND VAN i ...,r ‘ RN LANE PV.;/.1411t)rilr, . I PAIMINGET ••••• I / ACCESS/RE STALLS j 4 PHASE II P. ` I TI 't 0740 1. '‘.„ t% • ;, 1 J / .:',•;, •:' a. ••C e:::, : .-1 ,.. ... -7,.. ..,1-:..........;-,• ••C: .. c., 13 . --- T'l • : - 1 1/c•V. ',..Y-. UFF] :.';;;';,•:-.!Js..t.:V.... .t.;:!'_,_':',...t1::"... _.-.•••••:::-';'.D..-,--•;::::-..:,-..1„;.6..c, 1 I i , -- •f- 4..:: •••• : : a.., 1.,'ll I 1 I I I.--" "..1 II ::IT-' .-•-••':.-r,'F----•-•:.nrr,;--). -.....:-.••:2-:11 linall I :..., . '_,_ ,..,..". • a, A.- ... 1 rt ••": 1).1 :.r.. u ._,_ _ . i.... .., •.4..,,•-•,..r.,,-..t..-ik'23:4-,,Ki--,4,•;."-,.."i"0-..1-,::j c,--47...,a....?,:" 'i.,. .,... \--, ..i. . •---.: .w < •••:,„:7,.,....,,:•-.....7.....7.7.,."',-- - -,,7::::::;•;. •.-,t tyr_ . 4.'...,0:..,,, : . ...t-,....-..........,-,,,.....,_,..,...,. .•..i...7.•....y.:,:rt".,,:o..-2,-, i ..._. . ..• ...-•./ 1-.•. •:...••.,,..:.:.: , 6.;-.7...,..,:....-::::: :•••• :, . •k• < - tg,„ -4-: id 1 '., , ; ,. ‘'..41•f.aNU6nc-•-6•° 1ii1,il,•-..-a%,, ,,ia.:4kt,94c,V o: PHASE II NEW GPrwodoyiA IR 0,4 .'....i.•.., :‘' 1'--- 1.L •F'IX'''E''I MF ---. :A.A..a.- 4r Q'.1s" „-1I1:t1,I4•;:I- WnoNG .L . s 'I 2I ''6 sr,,e"„.„, •T,.v Vii1 Cf) "7";fltr'''.)?!•!!!.....___'_____ . i-• i -;.;1•.• 41. :i ,,.. 1'11 1•M T X I i142 i.'-'11 TAPLEY I .,:::.•'•,•0 I :0 III i _ 1r' ;,. • -_ -,,,•.I.I., .1, :S.0' ;.,,, 4,•v.. sNilill%IV1.1 Et t .4..A,...,,•• .1 i,,.. 5 .. .....•.,...........-........ I (4 I.< A 11411 •1 t .1,A,A•41:•;;2,44r;OV,10;;ItOs.N41,,A;YLWA Ira a i i EITIE'r.....'77•7::r.:7:":,,-4-•-•'.7......'.'f'.;''-,''''..,WrIP -,,,,,At.04,,,...,,,.r.,,..,„.r.,:.0,4„..0*,,,,,,:,;,,,,,, > . ;I, • ; EXISTING K21 SCNOOt 0 : 1° t;• I: ilI WiNHIN414S . '..••'•••••••'‘.'....'.•••'1..• •"•••-*"."••••••••'•'• •' •1.4‘1..' -.. '4'1',..1•5'..‘.4''..i:Wel''''''''...0itl ';:,• . 0 • !...T..f.i........., Jut;••::-....7$0'0••'ilizirt c'..s.:',: ;; ' -',,•,.....!.1=P241!-1;..., ' _,..st• .i..._.2.A'- -,,,•:-V.A4 t...„, -.2. ,c, ;C:41i1:14d vi .....Eill I-- -Ai:-.„--.to.,--4.- - .•--.:-....,.".. ; ,....,,,..:.-..,-.1,„ I. • \ i \ •-1---ill.....tip--1.;;;;‘,,,,‘;f414°.......".•:•.;i....''''''-:0,,,'"•"". ..*?4!•;:.•:'‘' ; ..,,,." •-........, 2 lag r- A. .-.-- ..; Hr.--• •-• - :-a.::•-..,j-‘,1%.-,•,'rinVrt. . ,%... I ,A...i•.1,,,,,,...,-.,....,....... 'A't,iti.,1 1E ,, , .. . .. .._,, • .......... ., . •• „........,„ :..,:. : .., ... AZ-Alai/14E 1 ii.7.2.:5r.A.,j.1.---1 - f!'....).:P.;?,.:".1,:...":"..:1.."ti...'..1...._'-...',.t.A.'L..:a....ori":::,....!"vPiREikr-i....?-ii:lig*•.„,._,. "..1,..tkvii.IY, ...a:c.o. - ; -•6 NEINCIXIMEWIRKIII...•-•• --'01------- -I CLASSROOMS. /X.,....1),.44 1M . 6. 6 6 '..i*.: : . • t ...:4. .41471.1,01,....„, . .,t... : . r, . i i -..t,./ii. •• • , F," : ; i '..: , r • • : ... ....mull EXISTING CHURCH -...7 ...1711•T 0 w.it .t.....:a 1*.:41 ... - , ' %VI : Ivi•,-;;••- 'I,'''• • .DIVA* ::: : ./..•-•I_2•••fh/--I I'•••-•-• 4 A. '''Nft.r.11 :!.).. .! '''" •iiqT,r, .._ . . ..,.'-'.i.,,}it!:,7„...1r4k,„,..r....,.., 1 ET/41 i'1 i • • \•-• ----;.---. Aorr A ,fr td . F.F...1.11.4Z sr, , . : ...,7.•ri:•17,g rv.u.;??!.r.,......- 1:_„-----f• iiv ... r 0; .,„....,,titt t.•.`:!..1;';::•'.41.;.'.I'' :7'.-.Z'x ' :,i0/41g,s..;::::...::::X1 • . L.... .:0117, '1 i -;1.Wt.r&-z_ffi. :"1,-;•,.;7.i ..,'' -. x-4- • 'r NEW SOCK ?.?• i 1X .11 :Nkitialig'I 'I. •4•••'-:'..4.''ZII '''' • 4:4:;14 P-'•vg:r•irr•• • •: .; i:1- 11 ''.: \.ilitt"l'.. EXSTING148SCHCX11 ,•,-1...• -'•,I,.11•0-,...:1;,_,I. .. AM ;• . : . ...:‘,;;,,,,:.-0„,.. .44.1-.4 '1 illk'keilk, .,416 •..4.,\?1,:,1 .! i ; ;,..ire.r.g . •••;(;--.4-L,7,.....::1-,. ,„,,„0,.axesaisapAresa I/INSIST • i.• 1 V 1 ': i I AI4ii •. ".-1•...,-..T1,I;^0.' ....•.4...... ,,,iikErn ix; "tr rt•elre et:ik.ri g .,...."0,...,1 .. -..-'' MEN iM',t••••1P.,;„, : ;,, i ;!::::-');•-''''iy,•?",•-• •...........k'•Vtro IN,fie.,i P's '..-.• • . ' / .....-'4•c. 6, .-Flpi, 4...r„,. •-••••!**1,:=,iiit..:,,..,•-;';:•1,V.:15,-...1,-••' I 't 1,„;;• • •••;,6-, .. / .,..1:,.*e.,, ,...-•‘. ft-,.;, .;.,14'f.'' tAx'Ae.,. ::;':::- '' .. . . .- . :Ive.tx,... a4,1,-....,.....74;-...k,*e -•':1-T-Alr...1.;:‘,-r.: :1 - -,•• vr,1,...k.- ek,..g.,•,,, • .- ..,../ STAFF S i ;, ---''`.9..4..'''_/...1 ._••. ...,- I a'.,,,,,q-kt-It>.,0V'...?....,.....iiiiii*ii14:6.i.:-..•-•.)03...ne;7 -. ' I i T.,!..1•W . ....!..! ... i 1 ''''‘,... •)".0.1t,'A'...&W.S-.4'\:gese.1;`Tr..4...a.4,%1,141.1vc.tsx....e..4.:klat'M !•''.;'*".41.1.14,.. ..4,1e1.;.":.:..' ,4._4_ •4.;r,,_ ' •,. ,,,: •it,,,,,„,q.;.,:,:lii,,,0:45„,•,,.iir:;':ft,3',.,:•:,„4C4..•-,, hi-,:-.'14...,.•••••,•-•...•.,:..::••••-.......:•:-••::-.-1•••.'44%,1., I • \ t:?..... ... n-•!! ••••• -. i ; ; ..),,,:i„,•,.,:... -... igh.c.s. ,e ir„ ; ..,...../.,„ ...., -: -it;:t...1,__,...;a er-A. 5,--- • Anninwp.,-,iimoifw.:#7/6..4 c.:,$:-.71,,,,..,iro, ..,, ''''' • • ' -L' tirta a ",.. .._. . :........* „.. DENgilii:E*.• ..m.m.40.,_„.•,04.-,INJ,k/... .2..„-000.r k •:-. • ..-11.4.-6;......"'411•.V1111"...,.....•.,•., - •.. 11 '' .• ._.. _ _ _ ___ _ _ . ; -' .-- ' - - ••''--••?..;,?.1.4 _a.._.:.,- :_-,;---- - - -:- ----- - ' - . - • • i it W4iii". i r:',1•:1'.„. or,t„„sr••• , •• So4Sfrët .1 i --"----....-.;.....-C--. '''' • ----••• 7--- r'-'---Iic;':-: .. I:1 ... '''-‘"--r--"-' • • . •-•• -, "Y-- ixt.1....s60'R.O.W:-•::,..e. .. ; ; -,4...."..vt.'l -,-,-,......._ 44.ifl."4. ,,,,ii!fla f"--- . ...... MU •-•....4.;V:167,ipArit. 1..: .,/114 .. .,. ...... . , I ; \iti '4 , 1 1 i i.VI:'•At ir---..,.'t . , 4:rt.:•ezlt. -,.,...-.: IL2::--::.;:ii:;liri::.•.:.:..1..:.:.'.. .:::. ..::: . . . .1 ' - 14aktfAirits".-;* / i - . ....m. AnN --- ---. -, 8,:::- :,-1.z, .....,.,....... ,Li...5.411:118 A.... -...... zu . ..,iiiir -. •iti,„ .nr.::•: AOF TOW 1 ; 4 ; wry ...e. ....: -1;..--.... fe- ,. ,N„ MO' air 'VII Site Plan A Proposed Phaso I and II Dovolodnont Q lemrmina t. r r • nem« I t • --- II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing church properties are currently fractured into several separate parcels. The existing school and Parish offices are located north of South 4th Street between Shattuck and Whitworth Avenues. The existing church and other buildings are located north of South 4th Street between Whitworth and Morris Avenues. The existing social hall is located south of South 4th Street on the east side of Morris Avenue. These properties total approximately 4 acres in size. Survey indicates slopes of generally 1%over the entire area. Existing vegetation includes lawn, low shrubs,gardens,yard and street trees. There are existing storm drainage systems serving the individual parcels, and in the streets and alleys abutting the parcels. The overall area exhibits good drainage patterns. These parcels reside in a mostly residential neighborhood of the downtown area scattered with businesses. The site is bordered on the north by mostly small business. K-Mart resides on the far side of Shattuck Avenue to the west. General area soils consists of loose fills and soft sandy silts. Immediately underlying this surface material, a fine-grained,medium dense to dense, silty sand becomes more coarsely grained gravelly and dense with depth. This soil type has depth, ranging from 21 to 26 feet. • • P:\Project Files\00025\0025 drainage reportdoc • • 1 L I ILi_ 1 . : LL I• .L . I • .._, ,______.____..._.__________77.....,a 7.7.7........ ..... 7. -......7.0*-.-.-.—.-7 77.—7—7.. .1- I 17-r , , ,,i_ELL, ,...tij , I ITilyi ;, ,,,„, ILL, ,/ • ,, , ,. I I--1 ___, - - 7_, , , , ,__...„ 7:\ II. It; ; I I1iil; ! g 1 ID % I , ,. , , i_., ..L. Alir 1 I Til FA' tLL1LiJ;J , • II ! I ., . Hi [ . . Ii1 . ..___.. __ �� -- l• 1 i_,_ /--- ----- 1 i I ri —i --1 ��® , 1{ 1� n L_.._..J 1IllI • -4 , I{ fy 1 I ! i li , Ii i i I I•---; e i ' I 7 i ,:, t 1 1 1 I If !JJhj / &6 4 g . _.___ `4):t 1 ...... _ — — — - , — 1�---- — moms. le I ----� I''.Y' - li ---F , • 1 � I I/ • I I I } i 0 .6 di ' 1 1I [17. lif ' r—/ 1 • mill • i _v___\ >. _____,_ I I, , , - - - - - - - - I I w 0 ii 1 -1 ! 1 II .= , , IF 1 ; (D lEE I I I Iri 1 .L.........._..._.1 WI . LI JIL __J -�-- .-__�__ I - w U,OA III Al [-- _ i r z 'd TBEb-29E-902 ' s2oa1.114oJ14 Tnel a9oeTznm da+. : Tn nn 4.7 Jac • Order No. 424576 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL 1: Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington; PARCEL 2 : The portion of Lot 8, Block 35, Smithers Second Addition"to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence north 89°47' east 120.00 feet; Thence south 00°13' east 20.00 feet; Thence south 65°33 '20" west 21.93 feet; Thence south 89°47' west 100.00 feet; Thence north 00°13 ' west 29.00 feet to the point of beginning; PARCEL 3 : Lots 8 and 9, Block 35, Smithers.Second Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 28, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 8, described as follows: " Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8; Thence running east along the northerly boundary thereof to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; Thence south" 00°13 ' east 20 feet along the easterly boundary of said Lot 8; Thence south 65°33'20" west 21.93 feet; Thence south 89°47' west 100 feet to the westerly boundary of said Lot 8; Thence northerly along the westerly boundary of said Lot 8 to the point of beginning of this exception. PARCEL 4: Lot 9, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page- 19, in King County, Washington. (continued) 1� • Order No. 424576 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL 5:' Lot 10, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 6: Lot i], Block .T, Smithers .Fourth"Addit On to 'the"Town of:Renton, ' according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 7: Lot 12, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 8: ' Lot 13 and the north half of the north 20 feet of Lot 14, Block 1, • Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington. PARCEL 9: • The south 30 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15, 16, 17, and 18, Block 1, Smithers Fourth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 19, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions of Lots 15 and 16, conveyed to the City of Renton, for roads, by deeds recorded under King County Recording Numbers 7305180516 and 7305180517. PARCEL 10: Lots' 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat. thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33 in King County, Washington; ' EXCEPT that portion of Lot 15 conveyed to the City of Renton, for road, by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 7305180518. • TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. (continued) • . ,y , Order No. 424576 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL 11: Lots, 16 and the south half of Lot 17, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof • recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 16 conveyed to the City of Renton, for road, by deed recorded under King County Recording Number • 7305180515; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, Which attached by operation of law, by City, of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL .12: The north half of Lot 17 and all of Lot 18, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof ' recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4893, • recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 13: • • Lots' 19 and 20, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. PARCEL 14: Lots 21 and 22, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by. operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. • (continued) . r Order No. 424576 LIMITED LIABILITY CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A • Page 5 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: PARCEL 15: Lot 23, Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by .operation of law,. by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under Kiri .g County��Recordng 'Numtier �200:10117001672. PARCEL 16: • Lot 24., Block 1, Smithers Fifth Addition to the Town-of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 33, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated alley adjacent, which attached by operation of law, by City of Renton Ordinance Number 4883, recorded under King County Recording Number 20010117001672. END OF SCHEDULE A • • : • ., . . . , . . ,, , , . . ei.. .,e, , 1.1 . , eigrig: 1 7 8 PT ' rolswbilfse ./ 1f,,l 2 34 ►3 ` , `��ls.' 44 1 4a 3. 3° 4* • 44 so.e7 /oo 0" 30 0 : pp 737.07 S. 4THIRD ST $. . ( wc) c * AU T ft '`f 47 3° 3o Gam. ° 4o 13 j j x 44 44 4o '4o 44. 4.9 se 2 f 3 . 4� d° a i 5 4 3 2 / • 1 ,1: r ??S o r S ,a. +�'Psv *`40 • p .4 44 44ti44 40 1�40 �4 so Q ,44 44 40 40 44 44 g 1? a 2 % w � • 6 Q ao tea IZo /m iso- ti �; �°V" I-4T .' *o 24, t7 11 �� elitre Q t' 23. H M 8 .•�41 Ro o in i�� air • a Y o445 "°°O'i�83 �• .! uff O 22 : 41 �'. 9 03 eV � 22• _ . : 9 c 0,AO R °I j Is038Q0.00N1t lt 13§ a qt 8/ : a. c /0 10 .�,4 o�t212/• _/o nti C . a/- �.,. ` /9 r +/2 4 [Z 4/!+ , - /2 ce 4 �g /9 t z us .Er .. aa: 1 . i3 V ..o io/s: h ' /3 No}�w Q,";'/8 m s �I 5o o . s,it, .,,,__ cap ,..1 11: . ' Apit. • g 6 it, tir' 50 3e t.;: /k ► 4 ;_. 20 4 •.nr 413+: ;.m.m.� livi '.f1•IMW \/.i1.�C�1 �•�$c.Y4YJHYir f�n7YrtL � S. FOURTH �.ST. A I 3,4 2 ? a G S 4 PO 3 ' 2 / • y ! �` a •�.��•i r N R. +lay° �4 q ....-_ "'y a Y i& 0g M� - VoVo 1 : ► 'rt I, �.6z) . - 44 : 140 40 40 so 4 1 yP• �' 1 0 ° 1}��(r M Crna�'s• o iZO�°911 o N • r r b it 5. r �f In 14 r �!. a% M T . 1 Gob �� ,p0� q / N • RL� f ' 1 r F'9 i .1: - Y1 • . �, � 13 2 4.13 / � �4� �- --rs-�--j �- ,� � �YjO� /(i 3o ao 1,�,✓ ��,1 +p1.l� `• �•�• • 5�'_ '„ • •a �� tia�� i41 /co .4 , 4 it* _..../30 30 41.1.10.4t itZ 48000/7,41 111. ,� .00 ifeetAriimetN) von0 ( At PA_./. ......_ CIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY N Order No. gag-C-7Q' IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. ';± • • hi 3 t 8 �'°°�s 4 < 4 �3 ` . a ��p44 D Aoois% 23 > `• N dolg p • s Q • • 9 41 O• 22 . u; � _ 9 O 4 4D° G0yO r W • 0l p.. /O S 4" o�0 2/ : Q . ,o M 00 o,1' 2/• 5 l �p ,�pa F Cn ti. /2co „ 19: 4. 12 . � Z 45/9= v tn O3 / go � -3 .,,_______A D -61 7 /6: 2 ai3 , °8: a . 1¢— > asol , 0°io W Y ,�'' '. 4 _ 1 17. .0 14 ;,. . ,=orib Q: ;1 • sio O p�D u0 0+°p 16 p -3° ao 3o 30 �..a �F �� 120 �20 �4r�, 30 30 �•••' . 1;:0 /` JZo i►?� .-.ss..s.. ,a.sio...s�' .-..asu..a. .»a.aaai • S. FOURTH fyysr. ,°, s 6,-4?w f4 L4ry w.lr.) CC ; 40 40 f44'o/i 40 4o,y,s4f • 40 ,404. n. 4 ■ • 746 T S,. 4 ; 3,4 2010 �ti/T. 6 $ 4 3 2 .. o - ti o' yse ' t► R a� tia 0110 d " ' - y s�-s — �°, a �9� � Q IIIPdfi + Ap �h ` N 0:ilk', • 40 40 40 ,/o 4+ 0'40 40 r 40 4.0 40 /z° 0 A • qq r n 'xo =v p yo FT g0 /4. ° IS p boh0oNa/� t 19�• 1 \F ) � • \^` OL o Au+ • I 6' ) w_�0 s„ it— 13 2 4.13 0 ��`',ppBt -30 3o �! 1 t• ' t /e h olyh l i 0 ��i S . d°Z.Id 41 s 3 aPte 3 v,*010,t0 00 // �p0 . 1 3 1b1.11 OG` C. (r JSG' 4 20 iL /2 '1 ,` /V ` �i V Y 94* ao . of `- 6o- u. Q ot-- ,� ft6 „ „ ik N o f S srf' Rr * 1F�Q t _- ''oo9 Q \k• _ .. k ,Iahl? (;,X, 40 0- 10Zebbrd & I ? • .: .Ask PACIFIC NORTH.WES'T TITLE COMPANY N Order No. � 'Z- Y-5 1-1 IMPORTANT: this is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is .. a ,fig& Is w ows.es 5T) S• 3 ST 44 ' 44 40 40. 44 30 30 44 44 40 z® a 6 S 4 3 / 6 o- ► . o 0 al" , C° R ` ry gyp• 00� ti�" ` s ,Q0 0 s 11 I +(�,, . ,Q., 0. ,.. . 009 001119 09 1 I s—i--- 44 44 40 40 44 0 A 44 44 , 4. le 6G•So N t9 ro N N I ' 0 t q rLD (tip"Q181;624; tv r Aisito lb 0 ____ 12 t t o i 5249,25; W 3 a 8 0.200:6 1.!1......""""""16 .§ 8 L. %, .... .. 6 - d 7 I :f oo0 O o I.. 1 /i !D ;r - �� 0 3s1 .,.. -v. (3 1 1 oe CC ,_ pa: 0 .j., be #400' A C3- . 1--0 4 4 /3 C) tz- vill t . 1 * 13 / tIb CC NOMO r) 4. . o ir4 420 0 a j ..A 0 , so 3/se ge. 641 • ' I Lt 404 k 41 w 17 14 na 3b 30 .ra ito w•TH 1 , Ifo ''�7N�oo�� 4 S, LTA "sr .. •s _ t iromrrJ, sf-' Smithers Fifth Add. Vol. 16, page 33 �t PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE N Company of Washington, Inc. Order No. 424576 IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. , , • IV.OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Church/School Site: Following on-site water quality treatment,.storm run-off exits the site to an existing storm drain running south in Shattuck Avenue. This storm line runs south for approximately 750 feet, picking up drainage from S. 4th Street and converging with a northbound line in Shattuck Avenue S. It then flows west along S. 4th Place approximately 550 feet where it connects to the drainage system in Rainier Avenue S. This system travels south for approximately 350 feet to a'lift station located on the west side of Rainier Avenue S.,just south of Burlington Northern right-of-way. The drainage',is then pumped west approximately 850 feet to a manhole located on the east side of Hardie Avenue SW, just south of Burlington Northern right-of-way. There it crosses Hardie Avenue SW and•travels west along the south side of Burlington Northern right-of-way for approximately 700 feet to a location where it turns southwest and intersects the system in Southwest 7th Street. This system follows SW 7th Street for approximately 0.5 mile where it daylights into an open water channel known as the P1 channel (approximately 1.0 miles downstream of the site). Social Hall Site: Following on-site water quality treatment, storm run-off exits the site to an existing storm drain running north in Morris Avenue S. This line drains into a westbound storm line in S. 4th Street. It then flows west for approximately 650 feet, converging with the southbound drainage line in Shattuck Avenue described above. Rectory Site: Utilizing existing storm drainage connections, the site will drain to Whitworth Avenue where runoff will be collected and conveyed northward approximately 200 feet to the piped system in S. 2nd Street. It then flows westward approximately 300 feet to the system in Shattuck Avenue. It then turns south and flows for approximately 1,100 feet where it comes to the intersection of S. 4th Street and Shattuck Avenue where it converges with the southbound drainage line in Shattuck Avenue described above. P:\Project Files\00025\0025 drainage report.doc , • ...,•.,' •• • • . . . . . i .• E3 - 7.:;T23N R5E-E 1/2 . • invamin \I I 1, Mill"! /..... / ,•1\j.. .. \ . i( ..,,,;• - .-..1.-ii.i."±-17:1',..7.:.- --7::. Icr /2 Mil Mi 1 ( IIW ril I ! e, I i i ,, , : . . \ AIN 111h1 I .,");a f•ii.c..11 • .„ 1 ./ / . , . \i. . . . )I L) AM am MUM , ( \ i .. / , ,. .., / . ., \,;., \.,.. , ..............._.... ._ NEI • - ' • 1611-11 • •• : : • .. , / Pri • ,..•• , -l.' ir./rs' MIN III= Lel-, 1 .,• I , - ) • • • , • : i MIN MI elIo.ce- 1 .• • : MI ra MI II • ., r . ,........-• • . il %. - •••••1.',.. ' k..j-,1%..'N ; .4.1.i T COI MI r NM I .•ifi '... I 1:,. .i.!i.,.%•1' - • 1\ ,c i \ : .. , . . „.. tetti MR! . • -o• • ,e • • • ... . s• • ..•. .. . % . • .1..c el. ...MI' HE 40:: • !MI • MINI•10.7.11 • nmmi •LIVes%.. earthm-...- r ,: . 1,. • , • • • . • ••• -• .. . • • .. • •1• me• Tt.,- 'ma, , ..,.... 4..4ii _NEN MEM IN •• iiie IR - V&• ro .. .4- ,. ..,,' •',. • • • _. • , , • , ,••••i l„,. s':, ..`%1 ...-. . hi. , lf IN • . slung,. ,14.34 1 -9 s\Renton Municipal ••• Alrpqr‘t" ' \-\\\ .•'• • b." • ' •:-.,. , ... EiliFfig / riff, I. i. . \ i • • . . • i \..\\ • ' I ••,. \ k•-...\ • ,,,,,,k....,Ki.,:. 0 4.. 111111 M• liiii.mhm . . 1 . ,.• liN,I. .- . • ••••,, •,....s\ -....,.::::...; • . , h .......,s. tb INN ERE \ . , •, , • .„...... ., .... \ s . .,, ,• , ,... ,_ imr.. 1111111149 i EatIA f ; • (--/‘/ .. / •• - ,.. • . . , .. , .. „ . - ' • rAlk . Fall 1 IIMOmil NIPI • .. . . • / .r ,,i•-, .: Mi Nal Emilia Imo • trill Mit ..•-• •-•- •• .. • - .. .( .. • \i . : 17.13-7 . MU Ern I '`J• ; • 10 Mg. II wi Jill ME • . . . .. . . I . .113-,7 'Mil • III 111111.90 • 1713 . 6.H3- • II . Ipti-e .. . c4.,-)• • . ilk. „.•• .z, ... NI ,:7:irasimpoirrsemmi ::',N. a.Y • . Illaitma. . 149 .(1644 -. , • .... .iii.i . .. N....111:Lit ' - •--;'--: ?,.3., 1 . - . r.• 4, )z. \. 3 v. ,_._.....fhlitilliiiiiiitaii. .1;•1.,'•i41;-P- -1,...."3-:.:; / 1°-3- .-------'---. _, "4. '.• r.----- ---- --. -.if.• i ‘1! -‘ , . \ it,. /: iiitott„ , illim 1 6 ...zi s:kf if I,C4-I3 : 0 MiNgliii1111. 711.11111"111111.11L111111.1"%.1111111 . \ 4a1 . . • fiti!..1. , 1. . ,.X44. .1 / .16/4-6 • " / cl Mil -VI VI ..-----------7.. --.1...043-7 ---____. _ _ _f III X- '-.,,,,. ‘ \i idik\4''‘. •\Igl a • '• 6 iiii ..1...ir .__... ,.........,_, .,,,, . .. ,,,,A,,,„ :...s...._. ,..., ,, ,,, , ,,,„4_ , ,,,,,„.8......„,, ii . ,..... ., ,„ • 4 '\ \ #e. 14 . !II= 11 NI u` •-•'. .j...„1/4- ei4ArN , v.riso-v\-#41 i . ., ( rthe.7,4441.al . - PM CA .7X4-1. •ImUL, 1111V • `..1 i r• r. . .. .• \N/''''EtZ •11A111.11 5f6111111.1111111111- . .11'6.1111 7.11r""'•-• . ." 'Al ' '' \<' / •. . \I lai Milli Mg • .i s if...13:.:...!.•.••1 iit, ..\1...../I tiri 0 ;all ill ar' '''1111 limilla V Nth \\ ' 1 ski•',. i ittAiiiic .1<f Nil i •., •• ili °A ma ..i.i ...z ....t , J,. .p.., . . . . .. .. „..„.......1111.1112.1-1.1. Emus "Iv.7,7,-i' • - :,:"....:,;,:niti,ca.......,wailiTs...tii;1 4.n ii 1 '71:: nIR M li iliNti filli114: 1 _A:Pi • 4-34 1 11111V.1 .ri-as t NI , , ,.• -- LON , , i •I 5-111 I. . 1 • / - \ • ; . .. . : ' m • ; II 111i tm. .4 Gilt • 17.63-11 ), . am ImiL--: .11111111 4M 'Wan l' I L. ..7 ,.,4 r..t71'..: , .‘ . . • Eh MIR • T-1 71,1-1FA gal ii ' 11111M 1 rAhra"LI • .w.ey k , -, , 1 . ,, .un kr JIM ;), '. r I ! 1 til ' • . Ina Li ' I .4_ .. •111111111111 111.141.. • :1111MIN allikui . ,\gio ifiganoial s•• !NE aari"n1 1 M IIIiiiiiii . . .• • . `:i. • . • . . INV Illt NMI% .; .• in piii61 . pa . • Itra ralliada •. • gligErras______A'• k • K-: sail ataiwrig , ‘• •• ... 00.6 • . - • •-• 1611/2''---eTA • • wignagi. irtimmow---------. .------,---------. .5- . 6 . 16..3, II 111•11k . s IIIIII.I. -16.1/6-1 • .6.1/3-1 . ..-- ... I7.C341 IP . (.0 z • 1 . ;111,1mis. Witsp..ir ill • • z i ligiff worour 1 11 . 4 1:.'b"ailwrArre.-.1 moll MIN - 71siii el• L gni . y iii rt 61-11 nil -Mal Odll -lig 11111.11, • 1 M I,. alfir 'fi - =lc 2.114111: : ; E.4 ,j,,i,, omit .,it,..c_1•1 a i. A...,7 ....0. .61, . ) 40111QT, fro .. . op kilift-i, t--.01 diljviv/it. ilf. .. . sta , 41;414d*---,,, , . Immo .H2 . II IF. • "mg . a ,Il 6/6411 kg imi.•• . . ., wit milar, . . MR. ,. .... Iva., P,..,::, • g•- 1.,....., 1 • .010:111:',r/fts_ • '4) . . -. 11,1 'ill lall IIIIIIMI tk .- 1:1 . .l.. - • '-- , " ' c rair N ilil ts.) 01 --, It , -11 2 Mil .iummin 1 6A-1 • 1\11,[6-11 11.\:,.• IlliaLII'• . :in, 1,111111 . ..-- 4 . I ' , •••-- 1,14-1 • •-ge• •IIMINNM,../ • .•T- ,...._ ; I Iiii ME 17.4-11 P.. ' , ... I _.„.._4._ r ' • . , ..:,. . .. . itt . )...,". - ... ' ". • ,. ham UM MI OM = • • ONSIII I 17.u-i• 4,2". 1.•••Al. ,„ r1 ......,.., ,,... ' ''''' •6? 3 ,...•••• ••., .• lik au \ ,::.;mg- • . :4 4" --/- iniwil Sly.I3 I I ---.---. 11111 1111 • :. kgma am N. opt am - • MIN ,.,:.:.• • Cl , / \ . ...•••• ,..- , _______ , . . ,• i •• / It" 1 I ii, 16: Ulki'i:: I • IIIII MIN mg 00.• . .... • .16-11 marl...7 MN , _____ .\ • s • piL111 le•,\ --sif,•6-4. :' '-fir., 111111/ IMI nottid %II .4,- 1645 .-,;.‘? , 11.01.4 • i v . ..., . I. ,,,,.., ,. ..,.. . . im „ 7.1,•____ .0--..- I M ad - I PIP IZEM liartrillifil•-• 1) IC11- • . 17-4 .• "1 V•11:1.. alik. ' II.C7- '-• \ •••) . '‘ :filil IIII In" ; J .„ ....„„/ ,.=:_.7.- 1:iLIC . ) 0 iku-ay.,...-.. :ow NE rira E15 ill:4 ip .f .9.9, 1, 7-1-V-.,;, EIZEI Elrit 11 nip FT / 1 --•";•' \ • -\ 1 ..• CI\.1 111 MN OM Intl , M. vrianilimin MO III . .. •• . ' . tep-oi ' NM Inn MEG own" IP..."'..o •ill 1 1 aim immi ill .• •. . . ••• ....• •. . - • IIII Ink( MN NOM wee- . ‘ • . : - . •.. ME MS MN t 9' gill INN I Ell 1E1 an arli • I • ' • •. . NNE NE gnu IMO All111 MIN alli all „„•••••0,..tc..;,tz;300010, ‘,..0.• . , .• i)7-II MN NOM I . Mrlin . .11 imi p P-. OM wage a• i. - 1 .. 111.1 ill • • -• .e •V 101.11,11/1 MI 11111.11 lioorli .1. ,,, . . ..'".14 ) Mil; . kiii 4 NMI LLser vii ., „ ..„,. : 4 . ..,.., - 0111. ".. . .,,,. , .....:____- ... .ION • .•, ... - ..ix _ -no.i ..-.. ........ . -.01.11.111.1441.1 I maw lit-4 . ar:j11111.6' 6.CP .• 17- i' • a". ..„-• • . . ••• ,k. ,‘ ... 0A'\I• I \. ...------ 1,6.47"411 an .•-••••-, -- 1,.... %.•• ' MA - =LIM IMIZ al: Niel ,../\;,.\\ ' ko-I ts.r7- .. r . ...\ . - .743---- --. .;.-, itrai MIMI ----.1 -....._--- Ell .4\71.11 IIIMMINI 111111111111 • \, •••••• 4••-• v N• h 7.- .„........f.,"- -• 0 - il am gm, .i .._._---7:: ... MI•im inime4 ?I I, Nom; MN • _ loiw.. gila Illirmari,. '''''',\ 111111111ummitti. .t!t, xs-,,,, I$.6- cm., --:::,.., • - •,,i 1,. ' • is-es , •_ ... - •--' moossors.:. -.. '..„..„ gill ra W. lilla '---il. . MEW I .MOM -Air-1.6.1 I • 4 ' r ' ....or • .:if-if • 11-4:-A Iti, . ..:::::-.- , ... _ ., •. MN 1111 NM, MMIIIIIMII ----41 ..n MIME 1"'.. MAIM ,:15 I.1111111111tri 6111"11.11611 111 all: . 1. .). 0 la\k .., • .. .. IN . ...... ., 10_,... :I, IIIL raj - - 11.11r4 MN Al .• 1111111111111E 111.1•14. 1712/111111i• • •CI'.1. MOW um inn ,.. ,.i- mini ......_,,. mig .11 , "1111B11611E 11111111w War' 1 '.1 • CJ) i3O . • - - .F11-13 .. / 16,/ • NMI• ' rinammini.,, . .,: i Mal. mu_ 41.3:1 Mil Flit bil, ii • mg - EINall I/ ',...i.. ...-- Eigia./...(:.., ,,tiei•iis-e MI'/ ' s sVt\ ... • • - . minim • 16 /i- . 1111211 IN21.11.11111 1111 11. Nintr '• 4.,,,4 11611. illadre.) .-‘ ll-1)dingit;i2).A1 Iiiii i iihorimEl •Ill'71 I! 1 • mom wiii...;..,,..s ..„ . •';.-1 Mr= r• • . / LC '7 ILLS 1„.."8,..151,./‘,/ tl • Erdl 11. L.f. _ al./ ...,/r ., "Al • \* 1$:*1 . 'I S. • .- - 13• . 4 -Willi:W.-- iii•2-13/1"11 MEI . lier? / ._ .. lin-so. Ull- 11,11 . ' 17,III-4 ; 11116-1 I 11W icEsta . . • ,t,., ,itio. , 11111-11 .1=0 i . . lirrr Whia v3.1 .--. ackammenver • .411/111kt-U. :47,1•73127- •• _.1' Peg -9 is'. . w •I• • I • 16 -. • - •- - - . ' .' 'IT!"r7 . . 1 ILIS `1 - -:.:11100--.... •••:, 7t, 'i-'; '•'•: -'.., 1:1, ..... .. . . .. ., • I f..., •.Y • cl /aixe a,.." i.... ,.., il, '2=1' T. ... ..1 •. • . _ .. . „Q....ill/I-4 , . . . . .., " . '...CE iiii7.. • /... IXil-1 . •. G. • • • .G . • 19 T23N R5E E 1/2... 14..=12;92....40 . .. F3 . . . • . .0.„..v 0 I4LITIES DIVISION . ,.....•. .....i. Renton City Limits . • 114800 4 !ft + P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES Contour*nosh 0,5 or LO mastoes 1 15 Datum NAND 1988 Motors- .18 T23N R5E E 1/2 • 12/03/99 . , a • . . . . .. . . • . . • r . • 1. • . . E3 .• 7 T23N R5E W 112. . • • . . . • - • . ..._ 1 ."" 'I" 'EPP— ,v--.;;,;,- Wk.;'?,-11*%)`44-7-.Wiirtuglittliativiiiqr-Mii,v117iiin111611111111ii" ligm . I 1 P r c, A.i-- -i'vl'"T'v‘*I .t'Alk 4*. i p Itd-i,A it 6 I lidt vs )Ak1Pg 1 1 L .'w 1 I 1 giumi . 1 11.1. INILII L s'ir.k:,._t.......,••0-:. .;., .1,) '..i La' . ; e (.; \- •\1 :' •• kK'4'4' AIP•'...i•sPr:Idegr011ik•'. l'imr;H"A. "Illf 111 .i ! .i)11441 • CM ''' V.' thilidlLii- ,,,,.$• • ,1,1 Ili A Cile \ly''•. 1\M11.. Nria••••• alltil(EZ LIMP 4' .''17 - •' 111 1,: ...-' '..1 J1110''ill'44' p14•qe--, .'s.b. ..v., , „pH, . .w.., • (--\. . I • rh,..411r76;•----•'-•:7-,,:-•-- • - ," '-^,-... 'I , d•I .M. •,6%,k.,..•`4,07,„: 0 • -.11.‘.. I M11115,,Am: ,,4,1.114.2,f7 r lifar.:3 . /114404...EaM,E1 ,.5: ' — • "-- 2Vi t• -•,,„ ____Ntag -:f.. " ' INVII 4 moil , , 1-: ,.1.1:LV . kiki . (4ai, • it.,-..- l s• ,), •.,•0 ,I,b--,• 11”'-" a I '. alazia.manua 'MIMI ,...11.111. 'in S1,-,INI :Igatioa Am., 'ga 113 -".. li• 4'hi ., :i I( '. mule • • • '17.4.:.' 14.'" . '-, . ..,. • m.•-•..404, ---, ,., , '- - 1 ....• ''.--•-,' 1 v•r`kao.:.ifialltiglig61-, kliffiN NINA 1/11, 11 ' t'.._•••i•! 'ilr.- - . 1 ---•:•:' ... \k-....L.....2_ -, • i ul li-osm-e- ,•;.kovivl 119 Milall r'1116E . •IT'' 11 . • .. .' . __,.... ..,\N\s„,,...,:::.-2..„.\,......s. ,..1 . .16....il• •Th!•64.5,1• •-•'''''• ‹ / .1' ' / ..._,. ..s..,,, ,..,.:::„.„ . ..... , .......L...:„._..,4, , „ 4 t 1..,,. . .11 , f tii ‘ ... ItA-...-1 • M'e 'i _ °II •• • • \ 13: • ..:- \,\ , , ...,•• •‘(•,,,C1! , „ ,.' ,' 0,5, 1/E1 NO ritIV KIR tr414. - If 1 itt . . • I 41 4.-..• /,' .\.--/''''',•••_:;;,`, -..''' ' ‘\ \, -•Th.,.."..'-ZL-wrillealkkV.vy,N4i'‘ 014 ,f9,731'• p.,9,P) 04: Anal •itertmit- .1--7P . \ 1 i 11:1 • I ....:_..,_.. 2:11,-...:•-itimikalltIMAIV,,I,•,....\11),IfitAl'a\iti.34, rii 111-61444P, i7tiv-•.: ;. , ..6.56•9 . [" Rent n , awn q 1 t.. .Cat ,-1'\ • ' ' a II i it &k l I , .,.... 6....4.1,,, , i 4„41 , ., 11 iii_I AIL,4 .n. Ls!' • • : SIA", 11 AW. r I V•ZS kr)• . \t a- :---.-1,1Wiiiiii vir gth Npolb\ ti:i • ,./ .4 \.. , -• \ - -_•.,.., 1 ,.,,. .... ,, kik>N 1v..: s N\rkil4AIL°Iffiiii .4yi,q q Kill,riVOrt,' irglikiloriaffAily , i . - Ale pr, bli,v. thicwwip-sia . ,.... 1.......,:z.......t..,...,...., ...• .-____ a., . -,./ 4;21,16-s i . ..a . 1 LIM 1 F.. LIZW.Y.1 Pi,..„ ! . 4 • •.`•it .=4.47.4, .E.-„-;•?.,i-::,-..-i:s.. ..-1::;•:•.„-:\:•,,cwi ' ,. si•i, , \•--,-,-,;.?..,,,v , ...--, -..,:,..... .. , -I* Atriiiiapl,,i DAS Mill ram IOW . 1 •-•, WO- • ' ' ..,,,tp;„,.,,..,,,7 r.. -...--n,,,,,,,._,.. ,. ..--._ 4t aura 1' f Hu NE livom ausgiValli ' .. . •• \ . ,..--....... ., :.,..... ••••..:,, ....m,...., • :::::.:.,17..-:.:.....\- • ;..•••••4,1\ -• „ i.:1,:-.:••4,,,,.•...,.z:.....-',.:•:;• --•'N : %Out ALIN • .,,.:.:1-• iir - - ..z71' ./%.'q"'......‘'''' ''... f.'s., , ‘..f.m-Litdkortio:d MmHg NM ••• ,...... --,...,s, ..\. ,:::•• 7 la - r:',4"`. A s•-•:\::::',.:-. ,rAT lia ,•!maw' • , 4 ---ss .::•-••• ,•-•;,:v,‘ •-•--:7:-. • r_ 1:-r '•*\.., \--......:: .. 4/0•,. 0/1,,.... v., vp. . -""--• ------`' '-"' e\-iiii '''- -4 4"• • -‘‘.---•:•: 4.. V010,1,4•Vit0.1 kl". • (01g9118521Iiinill T4311-1 '' r---.'"' . ; I • ';k4iPtiirlielni•mizi-1:;\:•-• !il L . \ - ..IIMMIL71.•1. ...- • • ''. •-•• .1\ '4-6 16/3-I * 1- -,r1----• \-.,irl.--i\s,lk sil .'S' z..4,1''.4ih';--';-=---3:-7---:'vf.fr-A‘14411 )f'.. 1). rre-jr4,;.•,--4111FRiP- • • ., \•.,;,, ,h.,•„„ lc %,,-,---.......A , is,..„ivv.,..,nodr. • •i. leaftl.,,, Flog ft,•./ i 3 I /- .4 It--‘,...(-, ---,v ' 1111,,,..!4.-434a , • N• jr i ... Aft..k-• ' .C.i .ilia , •FirAtt.takb.itiflt..2t4-,4L14-4-114411S--4-1&.-iiltilliag- - iriliikailifar''.7 Er•C'',IdiE . 'W 1 4 .1, 4 . aelifid 'h1V ' All _ ,--- '11: -.4111pi,14•Nt,. ..n......-,.1k-7.....re.r:•,;,...-- ..y•i - i . ' ' ' i'' -.L....r14' ' k .4'. \I\,11/4‘s: '... . 16,E4-15 °FJP.TIMI 1614-6 • mommon.,. 4 , • — --___-_-,-:"-- •,1„4-----<. , ,) ..,741:,, ff. :"-• Pf4fj,19 flekabir°_,,,4 : 4 1 -\ \ g -•••=.- ...,.. . \#,,„,,,o,•:... --;;,;; i ..,‘„eyvdc' • .Yl?':iii I‘d• 'rrifi / I- ''',1- •'-1 Witn.'‘VI '4 ..I 3,:-It •--- ----, r . / ''''-;i0.•'',....'-.1-4-. • ,,,W.,/,/,f, • ' . 9. i • 111?-,./-kAitt :::'.. .44, 9',... ..._ fli IIIIII •••• e'l: . . ,,,..',.....;, ,,, 4... ',-5tittlyriz. •.-j•-• \ •VAr'' .?\-,Z•rt.4"4- 1-P:'.41.11.- • - 4 -N,__:. -t4,1E4::;:7 -.:iii,;:- .Itw\ . A. ,j-, . • '' - -0-"'..-.• '4- • 4.11''''- ' ; .: .) .. mnpuiii-vaiN psi -\\-. ,....z..-:,, ,s-:.. . i[i.,, '•cs-,..„.,11,1, -., A.,:.-- ‘,,..,. ;57,03-t40--i-i-1, 1,f..' ")f,SiiVetifilli, _.;:-.`a- , - ...;, .N . /-N lilial4i: . .' I it-Zttxti--4.;*4cagF: es', .7.1107074:10g1,;• ' --...A; :-.7•:- WI ' frail Mill \ /) \ ..-' 44 : 1116-,e• ' \‘‘ ' 4 ... „.. .. ,.••••-.4, , ...." „.,.., 1c1...,,,..,.. ,,..,...._, .. .„,:aftr:.,ima...•- ,,,,„,,,,,.0,,,,, ,./...,4 .4.,....::::,.,:, ..•,... ...:,.......,t...... ',. , ..,v,-.7.--.. ..--,_:- - ------‘7.,..:_q!_,T-Itywct..2„ - ---- -,-nit':- obi , ...- •• ._..:4, I. iiii 4 . , \ --.'s., ..„' < r tit '';',`,.,... -, ... •,c _ .. 4vz57-.6.... ..,Rw.....-1_..---- -, \ , -.....___\ s..„,g i \•:';'-::-,•'‘I''' , \_.......... .. • k••••--A....r • .. , . .......mt,-,-..,,,‘.„....• •.;,-..,.\••,,,._ ..., , , ., , \ • -, ,,••••---' ki".WIL :•:-.Z. •-- k,.... ,,, 1 \ ;-- --'' ' ' I. - --<-•,-.7,.4t •••n''-,.. -k••• \\ \ -•.. s.•,, A, • 1.... , t*.__...:: •'..! . .P,:al-4.r.-.:=t•:.-,..-,44 :`' ' ',\ "t\ssi A \•• A. -.• -c-,-.. 1....., •• .. co iizit N <,-...--,, -------\--'' .:'‘ '.-;...---E-.. 5.::;..;•fg-t....t-.4.:.1.:..k. .).\\\ . i •Iirckt.l. 4-3. 1)170).Tdiril . 4 .--.,,- -a:kiii"a•-- ---N.-A„,„ • r...---1--- ---. ------- . .._—_,.._-__•--,-•-__3;ji•-•-,-.. ,,-...,:= ';?-:;\v 0:;• ,'; f' .' -.\ A k r ,t- "/ •,.;4.171 tillilLv rilltigl• 5.,, . C:...:"., ,li i f. k\ , ..ifi,L,•!.• di:ti. t .v trarrf::" Mk , 'fi i''. S-10 .)Imi 4 ..„...„. .,..- --..1 -• 6- 4. -'"Ilt"-"ii;lij N 2%*.-st.s.-.'3\'./... •`.-.:;-:::; ._.,_ ' .1 ' l• P'•••1 j \`•filltuto2Lfavi)'. . it •grgatilii • 1 • iir it) .agy'lli • .1. MN .1 .- . 03 '• ..."1"414611....'"hoilk- 4 ....13.71......?...„;;:;::.. .....:-_,.. • .T.1...)...! i .. „::,,. !! Viil 16 .791 ird . V4.4.6. '...,...rall 1141114 1146%.....,;‘ ,147 .,... ....,".••• • .u. . 1 . •.. 4... itlific.. tesainiiii!. r .5. ... . . II 0 .. 41111 aigift*- Ig filbegrOg"liaih.r.-- -toe_-r•••li .....! - ; •' .., • i L'Ilb Fillradlieli • i„,,„,.....Hillitsii to po. ma__ _ ,.....m... 41;, , ,,,Is.._..,,,,,.... ,...,..!.v.iffla:11 .._....a._ ,,,iirx„.744.4,,,ta.............., , ____-. ,... ... ..... ,, 1 1,pariliag ,w1ELINIMR. ' •'--- - : fliani': " Z . .::. tvtttstr„,._.•41d5g. .igHtn ,ffeningwyr VliallkiiiiiirPli NIre-; In 14,4W141wwii Fa sh--Ti 4 ig.,f1A1,, ,..109(11).2. ii„.„4":,,„.--•-vr,.••7 Neg____L.4009Alfiti gain: mammy ( g 6..4, ,11.4110,....„,z.i I:,13. ;-•••• iv; r›-,Z:•••••• ir447,04145 .....wrj.,ik. -:- - _Pk afilfir it 6.4 11-144 y t714111W ..---- -' 7441111141`•"M'Ilb...._ 1117/ iiiik&'*••E,.. ,....4!--4,,pi. •'. - . . ' 4... --446 lf• - ----Il iZt E i/kViti6114; .41349,1i‘kc'-,iiiriri 0- •fi°'--;-.-4-- N- Llt- kar'. ktrulim-- gifir—alWilr4""417 01 . m f f\ip,Nvii.: hi: Lf,,... .,..,A. -•-• impr ...6.44,1 .-,,Nwy .-- i:--4,-.4,q44,43,1-Ffio j -6.,... ----,Fd_ ,P7,... :,. iftzt. i; i -....... ..../...). ----Atiff,,,......1.E.,........:440,„.....444.14\11,,,\'._ ':_liti. • •:•;d4 . g'Iti---0,-."1-Arn.;; , 14- ' i...14..P4 ' . ' i S -iiillit7,. .wif at* AV NIS74.11.4.:,..%;it. ... 4011)41,11/44. ... --14,f. /i/44.6:',4-4vni-VirtA, 1•14"..`.--444W11-1 _:.-----!'-roda-4". 1,,ivile, 1 ‘53 y ai,..41t441,/if'4494,1,.., wi.,,,,,i'fr,1: . -.4-..•?-11/4t:-.17A--------• -•••••. 4;(4'it'lk\* ti**L''" I; : Yitt' ''''''"r :4. . ' . .3„ .--44'414,1,46,,,*•-iiwee4..,„_--.‘•414....#441,*--ri-7--,,,,A,,,v • Ailiv. . N-4-,:, iit- -:-,74#/e. ,"›..: ,--VI "'" -'"'W1-..-..---..----... '"egi"."-". iiig:,,,,...opf.,„•_/.,,,,,,...,. wij,,..4,----„,, ,,..____,*.02„,0 44f --1/4..,1 ....„. LutrAg...y-_,,, . /.,),„/„..... .._. .. • imp • . 3.&:,:•• „ -,..,c,,,.-- ,..*---1 .,..-411avit ; %,47,4,11,v.•.(41,../.,....y.0,-, .ct; i ri,-. ,,,,,egew • ,it,. .• •40,,,,,,f,..........,•-v,...._ „n7-,,c,„,,,- „.._ . ;.,...„/ i s:', 4 Iiy.. • .; •..•-or- , ...--:-.• • I / exi-4 V \\ices-6••i11111 16,106-1 •• 1 • %-, \ •\finni , ._... ,„ hduaz7.P.- 7 i•.•7,,,,'•zrNb..fflf.M. -14. . ..-7.441,0p..e----• ,• •••.1.1/ (i- •P-74? - w. /;:i•: 1 ,),k,. -- -t:,'"--.A.• ' ferfiiig, ,' 1 ,- '‘ A ./,•,' / :.//,-,-e4v4k: .,i,/,1/;--Arii- k .-___44*,,t...rf,.,---,...0_- 4r11,„ 7y•• a... • , 1 ,, „,.,_ ( . • -. r 1 . if .,..-a" 5#14:04-4,....V..-1.444*-- =',.--•"!e41. • - l" 44-.....- ----•-• . 1'..',, ' \\\f• ' -I- .". -) -/ \ k TO . I;Oril f t . ,, .,4r„.• • - ';/-;.:-1. ,*4 `.- --.4 V". --- s'?/'" ' if ' P-- --e---js'.\/---- 1 t'ik•- g,4i-s-pg---, ai-40,,. ,,..„......,-Ar- ,, ,,,,,:t‘,..... $si,4-...&-Tro .iii • ivy .,, li.Di-I4 ,. -—lc ' / ....,/ •16.Ci- "‘")• ) •••().4.111-17 . 7.11..Nif W....., . ,ini....• -.::.c.,,jolpfl* zoi,.... S,NliaAriftgiVij 1,140:9 ...5„.„,,,...,...' 46.110/ , •111.04-/17,--( • ft-II /\ kV1441.Z:1/447ZOffl"',.,"m""pillit,4%.-s•Z,.A),4147,....,.Z.4"ftl.:tiii0;e4... ...rott .il ii(----\,.... ./ ZR. • (ii.C7.1 ..\- U4•6•Is.\ l s•17.6 t. \•. . tt....„..,• _ N„:"K‘14, 110ZW_ ichtt(ctiL./: t"fli. .-..- .1,.‘ ...21006414in , ., 14 4 • •1.6..7-1. .,/ •• 16,ri- • . . .... 00;3:,:;;:fi;r:•--sk•el.i.)".AM---"_,- z.-. ._.,.,/ . -:::=•: ,--::: _„--,,,-,4,---iiirt,:5•514.111311•111Kw•.. -11.6 •;:m":" (;-:•-;-,, - rif,/"..7:ilf _klilliPar"-IWIT 1 " . ..i,...410pliffg,,,..,:: ik-:....• •. . . • • .2r.,-..,,---5_-...1-/•„_.':,i 4iiiL i.,i..,.,/,.2.j/-,:ei..s 1,,.r_-,.\r\--4-...cS:,:-:-r•:.j D o!,••/i-(:--r.-1.r.--i..-,.1 0-,1-:.-,..1"......,114.1‘...':..-3S.-.N-.-_--..\I.e 1j._.kr.rld...•-•g. .._,'.....---.-.-5--•i•'i,\\.<-••-:-,2:..,.,_-.:•ii7 rt\-.1_/_.*'L.-'.i•i.//,;..,.2..>.j.•..::1•,•...-7,.•i.g.•,.'1..:.,•-....1:t.,,-j)2?,.-•---i.•0‘‘•••....7.':.l-.i.'1.:-A•/"id/g:.:".77:•'=:...:...::;.->/:.„/:,,•-;.•..•...•.2, "1..,?.....'-•'r-/,I.k,\‘t•%\AV•t-.4,;...16N-4 11"7.•11' 71 3 . . •• , . f.• .. 11•;,30., 1111: ..i:..•.N•• -r-'i- ••• ' /,6,. 14,;, / 1 - . A / ikp, 17-11 /, c ,.. • m.\ a, .6:.:.) -• A ? • 7W u.4,0 . . ay./ .....-• ,•-;31, :li , _;!..._•,._...... \,,...N.---\164-• . : -I . -. . 4 .,.. f. •• , --„, . 0, ,. , (c\\ .e.sr-lk • w .___.1 LW "ITT1:•'-\-, •,° ' - '.-.---!' t'1.7.5-:',-4/ • ) 16,17-10.:-...1t--:,ii A. (--‘1: 1 \ • .- •icu-s t ,1 ,.• ,, ,ti r. (7,, ; .---.3,/k.. iv. ,. , ‘,_,. .. ., 14 0 -' 7. . $.4it ''t •-••••q14; ;-,...t..-i, •lit•N!:;..1.ts!.t:,„. ll.._) ''..414'71...711144b./:'.' '11 \J.). .A.4.',.P •.L.::. : '`..::".: 61 . - 1 :\ - c'47'7 - 16.r7-21 AtiValli 4. ...., --1,-.1,,,,,ri:::?.•.-:),,, .-k • •/•\ . . --•'•-,..,.., 1,<L..,--::!,g,:71:!,?,. ,r. \--, I4,C if. ... /...:..)..i.f 41 ,1 ./..: ••) ___:4:...,W-, _017..\ "'s •--.•'•'-'"'' 1 '..), Iv.."147' ---'..-- -\ -....--7;;;• t`,.. -‘'...Z'c...:.-...,,_.. r%-:•.--;•7.tz,V. . •laq ,, . • A 11.C1-3/* ., I.;',"! 'WW1 '' I: 14.1.- .\ilk. l.) -s."•.- 1..- --•":-:-..•:',-. ' ' • • 141.1. il ,.-. ••- ‘• ..1.-- k • - • . . .37-7 s i1 ....---..'•, r LS-6.,/ •I .,- us. ..••••''--...- . .. ., iii l A ---1114.‘• ' -- ----.r., ......_.. • ., •:...:- . • s •r- ••• ,. ,...) ••• 4 ;...; Duet. •,,.•ii-is . . _,: .- --- ..„.r.vm.' '1. ' ..ii.o- , A (<'''''i... ,.1')L-111:ii- • ..', N.! -,- - • --,---- -.°•,-• 1 ( , ,22...i............,--,:___„....f,_.,, .<•_,...,..„- ,-.. ..,-........ -......,,, . ...„_., -..... •i • 1 -,..1...,1.-.... .--,....,...s, \•,.. _ ilizt,_ :-.--.. , • , It. .•4-•4.16:44'" ,..._ __-_.-..-7-:-,-,‘ ii k . . _s------) ( • ' ,• --„.... — . -.......„,• --.-........--_,, - ..../.... •. . 1,, n• • 1 -..__-_. ..„,„._.„ , .:4 , ... ..,„ , - ellik*Ita- .,.. _. i ...__ •,,•=•-rr',,,- •1....,;,,••, •'• • t••.:., s-i,:i, -.-- `;•--•'•\ -' '''' - •*""..........:4 ' -'• . - ------- --'"It, ,,'. •!. •-••:1- ....., . „ . . • _.. 0 ..___ .._ i-i..-.E. ----- II IL' ---1'.. .... , ..,_ ,l, .--:! ----...:.,- -.77"."mantorms, is ,,-, . Ws- . Al • ------) .7L----.•7.-------7.401 .... •___••....... ... .. ,,,, . Mel ,,c,_____ A . ....._ • - , ililliel„,,, ., 7,---t-----1 ;---' , ..... ..., • P 1 ) 41 ga ), il \I i i iX -7 14.7.- .16.7c•.‘IMS • • i•• I( I : i ) • • • 1 1* •.1- 6us ii .• .,,,,. .1::,tios-i-----,..-----\ 1"-; • _. 14.77••7 . . 111.0•10. 6 .C7- .,. ..2.11L11.-.1.4.4-16ra-ic;..-1.4713 77,77,77,„,,,,....,„,„„,„.k.-.• _ --- - 11138-.1 1 s•:$4, ..1 n0 igrri ±. ' • •- • .4kia:iims.,•!.11T1ritEn:41/nEa.T1 - 0 i • / 1.1,g • • ,., t ilsa'-.. • 141 •'147117. 611.mami 16i1 . iliit!• . • > • • . 0 ( ; 1 . 11!1: •MAIO .MXII.4 . '41717 7.,7 /ewe , •141-4 El !..s. ti si.u.s •.6. I. . • • G3 • '19 T23N R5E• W 1/2 . . 40 0 04 . , ., , • . . . . UTILITIES DIVISION 'm'llimii• anD Renton City Limits . 1:4800 F3 + AR + P/B/PVI TECHNICAL.SERVICES • Comm Intemb 0.5 or LO mem • . . i e At • 12/03/99 . WEIN NAVD NU maws 18 T. 13N. •II5E W. 1/2 • • V. DETENTION ANALYSIS & DESIGN The 1990 King County Surface Drainage Manual, Section r.2.3-5; "Exemptions From On-Site Peak Rate Run-Off Control"states that on-site peak rate run-off control for a proposed project is • not required if the site proposes less than 5,000 SF of new impervious or the Post-Developed 100-year 24-hour storm event produces less than a 0.5 CFS increase from the Pre-Developed peak run-off rate for the existing site conditions. After running the Pre-Developed and Post-Developed site conditions through the WaterWorks program utilizing Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph methodology and SCS Type 1-A rainfall distributions,the following Pre-Developed and Post-Developed run-off rates were established: Church/School Site: (3.99 Acres) The Pre-Developed 100-Year,24-Hour Peak Rate=2.96 CFS The Post-Developed 100-Year, 24-Hour Peak Rate=3.08 CFS Peak Run-Off Rate Increase=0.12 CFS Social Hall Site:(0.65 Acres) The Pre-Developed 100-Year,24-Hour Peak Rate=0.49 CFS The Post-Developed 100-Year,24-Hour Peak Rate=0.56 CFS Peak Run-Off Rate Increase=0.07 CFS Since these post-developed run-off rate increases are well below the threshold of 0.5 CFS,no detention is.proposed for either site. Rectory Site: Due to the limited improvements to the existing structure,no storm improvements, detention improvements or water quality improvements are proposed for this parcel. P:1Project Files10002510025 drainage report.doc " "0" CALCULATIONS (CHURCH/SCHOOL SITE): EXISTING CONDITIONS: Total Parcel Area=3.99 Acres Total Pervious Area= 1.09 Acres (CN= 86.00) Total Impervious Area=2.90 Acres (CN=98.00) DEVELOPED CONDITIONS: Total Parcel Area=3.99 Acres Total Pervious Area=0.66 Acres (CN= 86.00) Total Impervious Area=3.33 Acres (CN=98.00) Net Increase of Impervious Area From Existing To Developed Conditions=0.43 Acres Determine existing and developed runoff coefficients with the WaterWorks software program utilizing the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph methodology and the following precipitation rates from the King County Surface Water Design Manual: 2-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 2.0 Inches 10-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 2.9 Inches 25-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 3.4 Inches 100-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 3.9 Inches Using the WaterWorks program and the above mentioned parameters,the following runoff coefficients were determined: Storm Event Existing Discharge Rate Developed Discharge Rate 2-year 1.35 CFS 1.46 CFS 10-year 2.11 CFS 2.22'CFS 25-year 2.53 CFS 2.65 CFS 100-year 2.96 CFS 3.08 CFS P:\Project Files\00025\0025 q calcs.doc 1..,71 "Co" CALCULATIONS (SOCIAL HALL SITE): EXISTING CONDITIONS: Total Parcel Area=0.65 Acres Total Pervious Area=0.18 Acres(CN= 86.00) Total Impervious Area=0.48 Acres (CN=98.00) DEVELOPED CONDITIONS: Total Parcel Area=0.65 Acres Total Pervious Area= 0.00 Acres(CN=86.00) Total Impervious Area=0.65 Acres (CN=98.00) Net Increase of Impervious Area From Existing To Developed Conditions=0.17 Acres Determine existing and developed runoff coefficients with the WaterWorks software program utilizing the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph methodology and the following precipitation rates from the King County Surface Water Design Manual: . 2-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 2.0 Inches 7 10-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 2.9 Inches 25-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 3.4 Inches 100-year 24-Hour Precipitation: 3.9 Inches Using the WaterWorks program and the above mentioned parameters,the following runoff coefficients were determined: Storm Event Existing Discharge Rate Developed Discharge Rate 2-year 0.23 CFS 0.28 CFS 10-year 0.35 CFS 0.41 CFS 25-year 0.42 CFS 0.48 CFS 100-year 0.49 CFS 0.56 CFS • P:1Project Files\00025\0025 q calcs.doc KING COUNTY, WAS } _iGTON, SURFACE WATER_DESIGN MANUAL • TABLE 3.5.2B SCS,WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS • SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) • • Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB C 0 Cultivated land(1): - winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 ' 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81'• Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 8t 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 • Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. • good condition:. grass cover on 75% or more of the area • 68 80 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% • to 75%of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 "' Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 40 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 ' Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion . 3.0• DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA . 38 4.0 DU/GA . 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA• 48 . 5.5 DU/GA 50 ' 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA .._56 Planned;unit developments, %impervious' condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and - industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9,August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. • (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. *�� 3.5.2-3 11/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3S.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ' , - • P_-= — — — - - _ t Willi 40 pilialliik 14 *fri'WallrYIr .re4 -III T . #'''`I ..,,,.4. iq 10Ailliwir VA r _ Ikla 4 sum - /lea 0 )--•& N 'Ilk , ,,,,,, p _ NAWallowlam: 1 24. tdr41•014. ,44-iiiii gypi ‘1,1,\ ovia _ air , _...t.guazioilit t i•A , It iligh lanwrxiat ,- if‘ -,. ..41,1 ;lir • •6 1# / '-'111haillIPPF ,.° ..."140 CiNiktbh bi Illitillialri .. 4:44: kltig i 3 W " ° II irsTlres*. 'if _ 24 741CNIbir .r tWilik i ' "FA V%1 C It - 4.40 oFor , Ng ` i---1.23-ti.41 • "ul lirifi"11-1*Plirlir- \ k ' -`4"'Aill„,/AvIirlIA , . . .)i -* e-"'" V"`g ' - Id%,.rlp NYC,„,.. , 1 ir.'oe,sa!T,,,m",r. tr..�ti/.. '- �, 1/ A `1 r ..0j, �. 4 Ih,, 4�/�. 11 17.mow,....1..,",,',".._/. . - 4-,01^ .1 1-4 r*fi.i,fw ,0.0 4,1 fi`.„ LA° i 1,i`1'''. vilt3L `fir , .164_ it ,�' _ ih�''�,�`. , Il r j�.��1 \ ' - fit\ _ -, k4,4`s�, if -t . .. -.' iiitzt*AN IONN's . ' 1 ., , ., 1 • , Ifiiko'.- -1/4i-gRvoti,,itli:Iroikitix, .--::: ' _ , , ir -4\,. .4; , :_, . __:._ , , , I librilli_ ;14Viiiiir1010,,Ve\- Ickik. J - ! '',Arli 1.' . - Allialkill$4 14sk, . ! omiazi. ,,,-- ,.‘, 4 zt‘74 it . 1 me__, Qr.... .A.4.4t‘. i -.-- _ _ , . I mu, %., mimirrzwiri c -- `*iikt,... Al Ts / . -= i %rot _ -..,..,. iv A iimm OM eitt ,%-s1P-ski - ; 4•110ii -y- At--\ 1%- %.- , _ if ! Fil‘Slei 1" ' Ili i� lr k to li • -Waho . _ 7 - J r /4a ..ni R..,,,,,,,...,....../, , l�lad , i off' 1 ..--- 0:;....4 jaaiiiipookirditorglilliipi I - 911pi • ,,, ,t, ._ ... _,..„,_... ...,,. .....,,, .. ,, _ ... cv _____. . • s, IliezMNIIIIIT 1 hrTeuri . ,--,.. lii,,__ a•,,...lit 4 ....., cv- lii$1-1 Ili allippurepoi. _4" it . _ ' A tilied Vi, 1001:' ,- --N...,40"'7410.41"141,gr ir .. — -, k 171 'Alia .F,7-- • = lywi • !r ,; ._ . 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION l a��{ I S- _ . •••�,.3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24HOUR � �,� rile TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ry O' - 0 1 2 3 4 5 B 7 i Wes . +9 03. • 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 ti ry `F--y�- �. 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • 22 '. 1 . , , v `ergai�i� t�otit54 14IL ,/�ain„� . ,i • •c;'\ �. withirif wri „pie gioc 2.4 t , SIM% i ,....4.... , i l W w * Anw�'��r %,_ a.1 " ihh I $P" FAI 1%, Thi••!„.. it , -=j,atailm 00,1 \ —' ' 'L‘*,ifF,1177,,..:..r\ -.41,07„: 4411411rifilh'‘',,. 1 . ,• if. 14.11111.* aa 1 ;Pr \ d , _. .I. ir . jj , . .-:,,,,,,,„.,._ p, .1 tr" rmalterlirp' "I\ . . . A ", •„.‘, ,*;• !.,Iii, "'No i irS1111, zz ,itallimmumerilikl* a/ .t:C 'I .a, .. s 1.5.'"NL , \ Attlekglig:: : Will . ‘u 3.1 Ice. JIM% • Leki ' .' lir, 4, Aii . fr •.10/10i‘ .06 1107-Aiskit:iiik • , ". let,,,,,,de ,iip .--.--,Ae:0.,..74.11 .7-r. _ . It onViks, . A giw - `row' ' a'*1:‘, , ' IL*, _ , 4114 . tiv ,.‘ ,, • ' ,-/' iihitri:\1 11, it' - '''‘* -".. =.. . -.-'' 's- , ...:.- IpiE ifii . iii,.__,...4, ,,,... . \ iip,k,A„,., .....: ,,, 41,,,.. . V L .1 ri.,..r.•••''7, . 33 .! .. . ''' . \ Real 4\ oh.. opeb,,,, ilk. il N.,...,.-r- -N wr • ,I1 ‘ . . .. ...3 ..,,_,. , di .le y 141116;--.._-.... ' , 17.1 / ) 1 Ini kilyt.401 4110)11.1.k.lik . • :F1- 4 • • 111,1140i litt‘415•06p,10401m, .. .ckl - -F,.t..1 "7 / ,' i ....;,,,,...,_ ,,, ,_....,e, . ,...... ..„,. ,,,,,, , I • 47,11: ,,.. ,, ,....._ .,,,, . ,...,,,i,t. , MN 6. ., , i - :::', c ogii, a • , 1 ogP l �t� j� `,II �• i 10 rn . a, f I r - c‘rifilliiiNIPiiirlii•kWit r 1::-11a801111frIl. • 1=1 • 41PAW111111h - 11Rialilir, ' ; '1 nri . ..._.. _. \: - WraltlivismieVlip .4111 \-1'•-• -.--. .----" Fr4LIMAlledr.,'w• — ca. - -- - ir I k t k its AR , .. n ( 4. ' 1L1 P: , a Mar jf '51-7:-. ' ---- - • I / NT / . I ' 111:11 ' ' OP.'..' ..-401)44 4(1.'1,4 -r k ... , f,. . v. • 7�.. ..111 1,‘Illi,AM._ ,V 1 . A . , -- .-... 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 9 %iiriZIi. •Oyu ,_3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR `IM�Z JVI r lit TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES eb• AN • - . , "Irrir ' ' -- ft-' nj. 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 Mlles 'x 4 3. � —`. d A a KING COUNTY. WASHIN,GTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL • • FIGURE 3.5.1E 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS `1 — —'ice;:►. ie — n�� -Y._4 i_--. ——._—— _ Re -- .- •:. lii.-raiiiiISelil 4. a i -- . ; :: • R_ tylPrIqr -'•'-ft- 1: -railr*Vii • 1 .. R9 i. Vitlittreiii II*A 4,14: II' '11 40 ; VUrAtesiPaa A Mt 3.7 i 41111;11tilflifilit ii;11 33 die,_ ,.;_.. L TPAIr '--2Miggiiiiir. • -10:4111.811104. . 'r-iti i r.• ; al ( -- 0 0116%""I'w d..: t: 1011411\ *°' lOrk 1 ' ( . 1 .ram: -+ �, .1i ,, - ,.t41111Kkiilt*""• 42,..0.3P1',4 _,,I.,mini-f..--Akli-siw, ---, ,...,,,,e 41,--,/ 171 .N„.:,,v.0t°u-,..1 I.P1. .--,-:.I:(i,,.- ,L-,4''—,1'-. 4,sA'''\,o'iL' tkA‘&'.'&Il1/2it%S—'441/4t-1 ►e r� 1 1„.A., ,.,_ i �r11�i - 411.",P.,41,0eA0.4,..g1- � 10 \...m..,".,.Aet0s, ,,,„ft,1,i ,•t,,•—.i 0—,,—/"'70 t' t �_ C, f 1 l `� � b-.0,,1 .,. r"Ai.. _ �' �, 1 1� r��y f.,,o .. -'A.,70 , • . ...._,,,wr A.,,1 itt).- . .-.41410-07414.11i„FifililloS,A- . .-,„ 'It : 1 i :•:.._ i ''.. I „mat- ‘ivo;.!-*1/47ititi,„x -N4\ _,A, 5.5 ' its k '; tx‘ , . w. ... 6,. ,.. ::,...y.,._ • i, , _ ii._ , c,_—_- , ,i . link,11 iv. . hog ., 6. w;A: s. ___,4 . ' i- \ ' 1 - - SW ` 1 .�i i I : �� a � 1114 \ ,�\ -= � ._, _ ‘ / ..( : ' 4- -- , ` � 1 A . " - • . .111111 ,,, .` ; ,. , '. =ibir r ' n lliP - .� } =I � T '.7 ni 11-1 IV iiiriMilliii_ l .. , •, ,:._. .,. . ._ ,.....„, „....., ��` lir _ iAte = ' .• • l'''. is- 1-1 *-,.,_ .---4 jam. 0.,.._4‘ A . \., /itid • 1.�� arni. M I . • ''5-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION a V�I� ` '''•• SS 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR 4A� IU r TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3•3 'Wlt i to 4S . . 3• ik _ 0 1 2 3 ♦ 3 6 7 8 Wits (b• �tb O •35.1-11 Aj• . . 1 inn KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL • FIGURE 3.5.111 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 3i, leolliZIAVAtTg 147-Ara..- . i ," V/ ea - pr-7:07,,.., -- „, ,:-.,-..."( -111/47N-clAlft, 1 V ' -,. ' 3' 3 * ø * *tL l_iPm. iW- 1". 11ralli lik1411._ It 011 I .. litIll ,... L a i+141,Nt ._,N..*:41.2rdisii Nettigib 47 i , f.iroarl_ �jam ilimi � AkAli., 4 Vgifri,:ejgr,w4lall -. /10 :;-:11 :ems k /''6V ^ 1 �� fiI�� . ` 1 /'4 1:‘10. 4.-.4,11l41i-l1o'i''L'ih'ks liil,:" :iilllk:L li i i:l4vl e-11i-*r1). tllkf ,!.;.I..=1.l "7 :,,1111,. 1,c 1r:.Z.._e .\ Vo aINfai$ , , 1r ,,.,, 7:4411 .... lr \ 1 • `" I'M ' 1 , `x..4 'irt---live-, 4 1 - - --illtaiti k v Oh. t 11V, Ilk s . .. \V„,111 \ii"'Njla ' 1 ! " 1.5iliktilipillilkiiV + / • - , 1. i PI, tit-.,, _ 1,._ 1:kmilikooklb, ilk \ .1.#} " / ,,5j_ i liworxt klitu\r-'..'-viumpubw-- 1 ' • -=‘. i i All ./ ' • 0.1rivg#14 k \ ...%. , 4til \( I** a - -=. . .• ' 101 11*,7irtAlt - lira Q=. . Ilk ‘ - -4.-.:.—/ .----- I: cell% t:-- 011113111% - 21/4 No 441 _1 0240.4.. e ►0,11 ii 1 MN A *Ain 11140PF4 Ililirgrilil MIMPaili -KIM tjr- .d . r:\111 r4 . II r i ilICIIM'i"Ili EMItilikPrcr ir OF4 I A Igr, ' • IMO. / '. r / Filitroatili 7i-41=1. 5. :„.7.-- o-•1 0•41111 I lir*Z\'rkaT '' - --. - / Iiii!AI VI ill iiik 1111 bilrirli411814111104 411N.) '.V. IL r'\. r ,rillMiliiit'llf volt 0111014,w44 NIP - • ',` • . \• ,ilijkla&-Adatildika i ici-liVAIIIW ih. Ili '411 is ... ;-/-7-7,=.--. , / • . riftiiiiitTA lea- ,� over �,,,��. i p ifi . Ir,,..iani l'i - . . illit ,!' .,4 i 's - -: ---' - ------ :-- . VITOLT...14 .: rik. "'I-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION• �o v ��f ��7�� -�� • 0- •s.•. ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR O �AAVARAW01111Illwr , 5 5"r.'' TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES p► 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 Mlles �Fr� tipP. 'r / 1:300.000 - 1,90 11/7/01 2 : 0 : 38 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 St . Anthony' s Church Project# '00025 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: ch-dv10 NAME: church site 10-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 66 Acres 3 .33 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 7 . 18 min 4 . 82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 50 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 420 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 200 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0093 impTcReach - Shallow L: 20 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0275 impTcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 2 .22 cfs VOL: 0 .83 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: ch-dv100 NAME: church site 100-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 66 Acres 3 .33 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 7 . 18 min 4 . 82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns:0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 50 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s:0 . 0100 TcReach = Channel L': 420 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 200 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0093 impTcReach - Shallow L: 20 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0275 impTcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 3 . 08 cfs VOL: 1 . 15 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: ch-dv2 NAME: church site 2-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 66 Acres 3 . 33 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 7 . 18 min 4 . 82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 50 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 420 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 200 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0093 impTcReach - Shallow L: 20 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0275 impTcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 1 .46 cfs VOL: 0 . 54 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 4n 11/7/01 2 : 0 :38 pm Pacific, Engineering Design Inc page 2 St . Anthony' s Church Project# 00025 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: ch-dv25 NAME: church site 25-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0 . 66 Acres 3 . 33 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 7 . 18 min 4 . 82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 50 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 420 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 200 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0093 impTcReach - Shallow L: 20 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0275 impTcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 2 . 65 cfs VOL: 0 . 99 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min , ,ti .t 11/7/01 2 : 0 : 52 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 St . Anthony' s Church Project# ,00025 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: ch-ex10 NAME: church site 10-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 09 Acres 2 . 90 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 7 .40 min 3 . 89 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 24 . 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 105 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 127 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Channel L: 45 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0169 impTcReach - Channel L: 145 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0111 PEAK RATE: 2 . 11 cfs VOL: 0 . 79 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: ch-ex100 NAME: church site 100-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA. ... . . . . : 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 09 Acres 2 . 90 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 7 .40 min 3 . 89 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 24 . 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 105 . 00 ns :0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 127 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Channel L: 45 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0169 impTcReach Channel L: 145 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0111 PEAK RATE: 2 . 96 cfs VOL: 1 . 11 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: ch-ex2 NAME: church site 2-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPElA PERV IMP J PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 09 Acres 2 . 90 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 7 .40 min 3 . 89 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 24 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 0.0 ks :27 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 105 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr.: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 127 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Channel L: 45 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0169 impTcReach - Channel L: 145 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0111 PEAK RATE: 1 .35 cfs VOL: 0 .51 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min ..r y 11/7/01 2 : 0 : 52 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 2 St . Anthony' s Church Project# 00025 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: ch-ex25 NAME: church site 25-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 3 . 99 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPEIA PERV * IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 1 . 09 Acres 2 . 90 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 :00 98 . 00 TC • 7 .40 min 3 . 89 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 24 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s :0 . 0050 impTcReach - Sheet L: 105 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 127 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Channel L: 45 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0169 impTcReach - Channel L: 145 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0 . 0111 PEAK RATE: 2 . 53 cfs VOL: 0 . 95 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 9/18/01 2 :47:39 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 2 Project 00025 St. Anthony' s BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: sh-ex10 NAME: social hall 10-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0.18 Acres 0.48 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 86.00 98 .00 TC • 9 .24 min 1.82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 60.00 ns:0 .1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0.0150 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 .00 ns :0 .0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0130 PEAK RATE: 0.35 cfs VOL: 0 .13 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-ex100 NAME: social hall 100-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • . 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0.18 Acres 0.48 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86.00 98.00 TC • 9.24 min 1.82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 60.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0150 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0130 PEAK RATE: 0.49 cfs VOL: 0.18 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-ex2 NAME: social hall 2-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 .18 Acres 0 .48 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86.00 98 .00 TC 9.24 min 1.82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 60 .00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0150 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns:0 .0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0. 0130 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-ex25 NAME: social hall 25-year ex SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0 .18 Acres 0 .48 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 86 .00 98.00 TC • 9.24 min 1.82 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 60.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0.0150 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns:0 .0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0 .0130 PEAK RATE: 0 .42 cfs VOL: 0.16 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 9/18/01 2 :47:39 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 Project 00025 St. Anthony' s BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: sh-dv10 NAME: social hall 10-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0.00 Acres 0.65 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 0 .00 98 .00 TC • 0 .00 min -2 .02 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0100 PEAK RATE: 0.41 cfs VOL: 0 .15 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-dv100 NAME: social hall 100-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres 0 .65 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 0 .00 98.00 TC • 0 .00 min 2 .02 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 .00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0100 PEAK RATE: 0.56 cfs VOL: 0 .20 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-dv2 NAME: social hall 2-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.00 inches AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres 0.65 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 0 .00 98.00 TC • 0 .00 min 2 .02 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0100 PEAK RATE: 0.28 cfs VOL: 0.10 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: sh-dv25 NAME: social hall- 25-year dev SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.65 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres 0 .65 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 0 .00 98.00 TC • 0 .00 min 2 .02 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100.00 ns :0.0110 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0100 PEAK RATE: 0.48 cfs VOL: 0.17 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min Ga`�� VI. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Conveyance calculations will be provided when construction documents are submitted for Public Works review. • P:\Project Files100025\0025 drainage report.doc (! VII. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS After running the Pre-Developed.and Post-Developed site conditions through the WaterWorks program utilizing Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph methodology and SCS Type 1-A rainfall distributions,the following 2-year Post-Developed run-off rates and volumes were established: Church/School Site: (3.99 Acres) The Post-Developed 2-Year, 24-Hour Peak Rate= 1.46 CFS,Volume=0.54Ac-Ft Volume(2-year)=0.54(43,560)=23,522 CF Social Hall Site:(0.65 Acres) The Post-Developed 2-Year, 24-Hour Peak Rate=0.28 CFS, Volume=0.10Ac-Ft Volume(2-year)=.0.10(43,560)=4,356 CF Rectory Site:. Due to the limited improvements to the existing structure,no water quality improvements are proposed for this parcel. Per the King County Surface Water Manual, water quality facilities shall be sized to treat 1/3 of the 2-year Post-Developed run-off volume. Church/School Site: (3.99 Acres) Volume(2-year)=23,522 CF (Treat 1/3 2-year volume) Volume(WQ)=0.33(23,522)=7,840 CF Choose water quality vault or tank providing volume of 7,840 CF Social Hall Site:(0.65 Acres) Volume(2-year)=4,356 CF (Treat 1/3 2-year volume) Volume(WQ)=0.33(4,356)= 1,452 CF Choose water quality vault or tank providing volume of 1,452 CF Rectory Site: Due to the limited improvements to the existing structure,no water quality improvements are proposed for this parcel. • P:\Project Files\00025\0025 drainage report.doc VIII. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN The project will provide typical Erosion Control BMPs, including the installation of a stabilized construction entrance to eliminate the potential of mud tracking into the existing City streets. Furthermore, silt fencing will be installed along the site boundaries as needed to eliminate the potential impact to adjacent properties and to delineate the clearing limits for construction activities. V-ditches will be constructed as needed to intercept and route any surface run-off that is generated from the construction clearing and grading operations to a properly sized sedimentation trap. This flow will be detained in the trap to allow for the removal of sediment from run-off originating from disturbed areas of the site. During construction, existing catch basins will be lined with filter fabric to ensure that any sediment-laden run-off is filtered before it discharges into the downstream system. Additional measures may be required by City of Renton _ if the above measures prove to be inadequate. P:\Project Files\00025\0025 drainage report.doc �—. J[TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Printed: 05-02-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-054 Payment Made: 05/02/2002 11:18 AM Receipt Number: R0202447 Total Payment: 2,539.78 Payee: ST. ANTHONYS PARISH Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 2,000.00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 39.78 Payments made for this receipt - Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 2015 2,539.78 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 CITY OF RENTON 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 MAY 0 2 2JO2 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 RECEIVED 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00