Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-156 INEIrr-n7IFF 71111111111111ffr 1lNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr 11111111111111111111•11111 _ 0 0 CITY OF RENTON , ...., .. . - ----*1-444-Zit-' aoll. Planning/Building/Public Works Et)M p- 5 orr‘7 Ai .. 3A- 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 o 1-3 C/3 A— ) MOW 09'99 ' ;S.4 6 - 0 3 0 5 : ...tiamma ... ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED ta. ii . .,.1 '. 7 4260 U.S. POSTAGE 2' -/,z.2-'(,11):3,•z::: 22999:1:3 5 ) F11 PRESERTED SEA IAA 981 -.„-- 3 1 2305-901 3-07 , . VIKING FREIGHT . INC 411 EAST An_UMERIA * , 95134 SAN JOSE CA _ l SEWS:S/327;2, iiiiiiiitiliimiiiiithiudilitiditlimisidliiihimiiii wai r3 _ ___ ir:- „.,___ . _._. ._ '', r i 0 p CITY OF RENTON 4 , mu. WorksEl g a.. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co NOY ®g199 ® At Z.a ram .: 0 3 0-5 1 IC CC * • - 'ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED s. w P�l ETER r- --- 1�04260 U.S. POSTAGE * . 11 id 99 FCM PRESORTED SEA WA 981 . 312305-9121-06 • - , . . i KNUDS0 INVESTMENTSLl_C..: 559999 25707 ; SF 192ND ST - • MAPLE .VALLEY._ NA • , 98038 NOT DELIVERABLE 666/ AS ADDRESSED 4e, a) AN 9l UNABLE TO FORWARD rn w � w 11tt tt tt t i [[ iit} jj Bf ! qqI if iiJj1 !! Ittt RETURN TO SENOR • 6 Wd .a 3,Pai.a:"a —::,:�w 1tili.tla'.t:{tti.:14istisielftsllii 1sJrl:aiii:!ia�s?ilihdie�-aiiltlfltiiiiiihn! SW,4Ie4VEET sem..arvic common,—..„4/38165100 66469' • --- -- ---;7------ ----T. 1 _IT 0 A•Elg'28'33' / IN , ---=71P(7 i I 1111111 MITHUN in= „ ism 1 , 1 1 --pv I r 1 F.--iiT--i T. 1 -T. (11 1 1 ml ipv 1 1 N ' I I IIIII ) , I p,PJ4. ,iTia= I I I I I I I I I I I I II I iti".41?. 1 1 ' _I I _I L . , . . . - -----T1-1---NL7 ! SEA PACK 1 I I I I I I 1 ..---LLTM4 ' ..' 1 1'1 ' CENTRE K! T 7 F T 7 7 T 7 I : I I Seattle Packaging I : ! I I I I , , I I Corporation LEGEND tom SW 43rd Street I I I I EXTENT NEWAMPERVIOUSI , I c ..=.:___l____l_ _ _7L___I____I___+________________[_._4_ i 4_ _4 A 4--1 1- + ' i-1,---0 Renton WA 98055 , ! I 1J RI I r-------- - Effl ARTE,OF NEW INg GrLEDRLINOR WORK I -5 4 ic iliiiliiiii !,x),:c7u. I __AiidiliAW11111 NO PARKING AREA I ' 1 Ogg; illi . _L_1 L__L L J 1 L _L_I 411 ° . . .....*:::::$:::::, 04 1 , Po I i I"131 I ii:i:ii . i. I .1* RI 1 ' :iii' 1 i 1 1 i 'pg:r.. mignim ' i 1 1 I I I -I NORTH II .•". I I I I I ••••••••-•••••••................ -F-T-7-1.-T T 7 1 7 7 t •1° 4 1 I o i II /. ................ ................ ................ ,. 0 -------I---I- --I H± -I H+-I 4 1 -4 -I -I--1 I-+ . -VrV)• ; -. i I I I Ill L J .1 . _1 _1 .L__1— 1 -1-MI! PROPOSED SITE PLAN NOTES zi I ' I I I I I ScAIC N.T.S. 2 T, ' g , I 1 — TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 653.250 G 5 F U I WHIM III 10/25/00 SITE APPROVAL FIRST FLOORIEXISTING AND PROPOSED)394 060 GS,F a ,OPLATNOS TO umw•EXISTITO SECOND FLOOR1PROPOSEDI 1e 950 G S F 1 """r' ''TI." 1 I I 12/3/00 OD SET r.TOTAL PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 413.010 G S F. PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE 6gX 1 ®--------'-1-----L-i PTTPT — mu 0. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA 64.169 GSF I 5twoo CD SET TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 191321 G S F TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 210567 GS F A 4/78/00 ADDENDUM 41 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED I A 1 : ' 1111 &H El 1 I --10 (........,......... A 7M00 PPRMIT RFW6KIN PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 3S-6' L -L-1 IL-I-.-I BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE -IQ : • ARTERIAL STREETS 20' • , • • I- 1--- --I---1---- --1---1-' 4--1144'1414--0 OTHER STREETS,5* ' ' ' ii:ISiIilgiIIIi: , , , WS PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS 42 FRONT I ' 1.1 va...r..1 ........ A115'SIDE I I I ! . iiiinii, AOOTEON TO I I JP ....... TTPIC.IP LANDSCA.IPG I i.MT%1 20'REAR seruccextsrvia Ammon° I I n. I I I iiii:i:ii:ili:i:iii , I "'I."' I I ] I [/J tra ] ! ! ow. DS ,...„....,„ : I Aerer n isi:imtt* 1 . ' ' 05.C5 I ,44 PROPOSED PARKING ANALYSIS/LEGEND I 1 _L_1 L J__1 L_L I.ii;i0i;iiiiiii.1 L . i _i____L _ __L i____1 I STANDARD STALLS 191-(NO NOTE) , , @ A tj-- , . , -- ' ' ' ' , I 1---0 ••••• COMPACT STALLS 12021 47- (C) -I : 1 1 1 1 I ACCESSIBLE STALLS 7- 1H/11 VAN) TOTAL STALLS 245 I I - -II - -Mr"-- r- -. I I I_1_ - _ - _ _ _ _ -- -k 1 -.`1 - gf'P-- ------. - .NJ:Olt"A! r 1 el -.... , 1 1 1 1 1 n 1 i .. 1 ,® _,_, ..s.t 1 1 „---- ,-----11-I-471=-- r T 7 F T Ar- -1-------T 7 1 7 1--------T-7-177---:, - 1 °,771---,, , 00 ! !log° . '- !Aiiimit:KosimaKmtaitmotioxeit-,, I . .:I -LA-, .„;ii;!:%•i:!:ki!!!!!!!! . . ...., i...... 11 ' 11 ..., 'K;iihminie... I ""-'-': SITE PLAN .........s...................;.:.-...,.....- ....,a.. ... - --- • ---- ftlim...-..irileT1::::.rmisra• ti.--7---7 , , I sralf,L.,..,,I ,,,. Eii . A A lic,1 1 I mike...011w ! a., ,, . .,._ _____. ,v .. . .m.„,.._____,t, _ ,4_,,,,a, hill ..e, 4imin am,----J-ili- IIIII 7---77:1F4"-'4it' ll ! li rinstotrii It. . . . I prt),,,t „ALirl ...... 2115/00 ' J.....2.4.4'2,,,,..4017/ , °PROPOSED SITE PLAN No\ ---, . .i,tri*-4 IMINIMINNOMIN .4- - • ..,..j.. fl.-Mi* 11111111111ME . 1 i 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0..,0 0 1 co 01414./(E) a) 1 0 c) ,a2 cep co..a) ,;_co te e ;t I 1 .---- , i - A13 ". '...'' '' CD SET r-. S883651E 67090' ••••• -•.•••••• ., S.W.43rd STREET sAwcur exsT cormA DrOzOR.I.!N,.l.HYr Fe.R,4A7ME.4.... 0 0 M MIT HUN .........,LANDINO.0. q IIIIIMINIIII A ........5..383/------- - • A . „s.ss_s„r 88,,s,:sulccu. ........"PP' a ,.., . ..._ It - -- BAUER ROO REFER TO - STRUCT.DRAWINGS am .... ______C) -0 12 - -- . RTFER"TON'T"'RUCT !P ( , DRAWINGS iii1/21 ..0. 4-0. 1047 BO ,, . 2,tf::' I REMOVE EXISTING CANC.WALL ..11,I.ai•ITZ3 fiF° 'I Eo 111621-L 7 IrICATED—/—io,AbA . CO I ELK[OUP v. SEA PACK .7 ,, ,_ ..... , ,,.. — -T,." L ? . _,. .„.-.- - 1 Seattle Packaging NEW CONC.SLAO TO 5, „ NATENI EXISTING.T9 o:2- VoVIII..2 REFER TO STRUCTURAL.L,. T4 ._ TO. ABIO -.L , DRAWINGS Corporation ,i.,. n I•,-; ,__..____, a 1 e 1 i ,_, 7 .---,97 , LL A A ,e io,,,,sw 43rd Street ..: Renton WA 98055 I caxoPy Asove-1 El ®' .— I -9— 1, , ` EZ ''''. '',, . PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED PEW Y ± , . .7, •0.., .4„.y °p.m,.j,,,,..,,,,,,,,s c.c WAIL°NTT. @ 1 EVE I Mil Ei - -0 ' . Mierig' I I a; - e, y-L • a 1 8 . —\--- gt=r, NORTH —NM 1110. NEW FLOOR ANDI /0,4 Mr ,= M . 1 P. 1 MI ''( '' - hLE,NOVE EXITING MC!ALL (I I> MALL FINI.ES ME :IxoUENTI-OltErt Rw. .... K , 11 _ L? = - § ,: .= , ,... — Mi_ eig IN ri, ga. ii m 1 i= 1 . ,. ii . .„ .1 ,. .. , „..r.„,,,..,,,,:,,,,,,.,,,. _... ii„.. _. --,,%'. 1 1 8 5 '''. 11 pil ...•. _ L .:, 1 e;IE. idiiih in MN CONC 645 TO 31 • 60 1 4,1 WATCH EXISTING.TYP REFER TO SITILICTURAL DRA.IGS Ilk M'' al El . — • F „„--, 7 .... KEY PLAN °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN-PRODUCTION AREA WEST CENTRAL i hti 1:1- -1-(1 i 0,1 i: I 1 El Scale:N.T.S. I I IP. •• a;t4' I±1 - - (:) - 10/2182 SITE APPROVAL I 1 =4: 1 17/1M OD SET 0 T T 0 • I 12/20/08 PERMIT SET 3/15/00 CO SET 1 , A 4/28/00 POOPPODM RI - I I i - -- - A 7/7/00 PERMIT REVISION °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN-PRODUCTION AREA EAST .I °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN- RAIL SPUR INFILL EXISTING I II E7AWW12S320T00•2,N PROOMoFFEFDFWIICCuSEE L TNOI OONN AREA 2.-0 s 6-0I-- ,10 VNWiDDO 75.7 80 77.,7 a0 -09 PPPTTT PPPTTI KI--C K • W•.1330004218 NE=EXWIS TMINEIGT AI DOORS 300 NO •, .Lo 07 ,KR ,•• oo, WW L AFLNL=TTFAOE OTB OEEWOAARELE LM I NOVKELDL ED JJ.D...DPSP / ..D...S Nail D EN KC WOO. X A ....... JP .... Pnenogr.g.rrrg 1 1 -=— -- OrstrAucn,A,P.M:;TRAT TED:u.r,AWALL,w 11 Vv./ El I — wW:50:IctoR:::oser T-o.5-5. wo W306•WOVEN S ROOM -3.-0•B-0° . 7.307 OFFICE 7.308 OFFICE W309t,LON.POOL. w0 7 7 - PT PT KICK . 7 7 - PT P7 5CK • WO 7.5 5 8 - 9 PT P7 .10 OAIA exnP PCOM V-0.•0.-13` wD WO 7 7 - PT PT DO MIN SMOKE CASKET BALT SELF-LB:OS!. 7.305 w306a W300B -W307 .092 W310 I= BRACE MAME Mt STRUCTURAL) 1111n21:1_ .11 orncp IVO 5 B 7,8 a PT PT N3II •— -- — - 207. RECISI••• W3‘,.3,2 stmo.,Lc WO 7 7 pr pr 20 INN SMOKE CASKET MD par-cLomPc W313 .__o_L___9 P 18 WARENOUSE IN 7 7 -- PT PT - . :ato 411, I 4 I WOW 2IIIII/OL1102.1 AREA 7/330 CORRIDOR ALM 5 SFa 7.SF 9- CLEAR CLEAN WIN) ' da4;144 wPT CAA 710 vr FT W331 I 4.,; . I . ., .320 OFFICE W332I,orncp W33. LUNCH ROOM WO 7.a 7,0 9 PT PI ,8 ,0 9 Pr P7 W3320 WaSON w33-• . 7 7 - - PT PT 17326 FART1AL W237 1411110R,CLOSEI 3-0•6-87 ViD . 7 7 - PI P7 KKK 17327 _ ] O .100 OPEN oF,FFICEEE 112•Do ENLARGED W340a OPEN w2.11 OFFICE . 5 PT P7 7.0 0 9 - w3RON w2•I FIRST LEVEL PLANS . tek cl •Zrt .. 8008S 0-- - - - _I aP5/00 0/e000i0000liT080000000ergN.44 Efern" In EA0006S ......... °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN-PRODUCTION AREA SOUTHWEST A2.2 CD SET --.3 .00. .A ./... -.A.--".... -.A......A. A A M MI THUN 9' 9 SAD -9 CD CD CD 9 CD CD ill) CD CD C) 9' 9 9' 9 9' P cx? T 9 _, :„..-.-:-...„ ,.:=..........: I 1 I 1 I I "-ggz; i nro,ri I I —""" I New Boor.FLA",AND dr A heck:gg:-\ '"f`"`"1 I ".,,, , , I , 1 ...,_ ,..„..„, L IL I ,.-it.....„,..... . , 112 L._._ 'ic.,„_,`"„0,. L,.„_.c„. L EXISTING DOCK 00041)1 VRELOCATED EXISTING EXISTING DOCK DOORS ' -TER7TIND DOCK REA i L.151710 DOC-\K DOORS L EXISTING SO DOORS -,_:-..--,--_-'-:_:,_1 1WIZY FtEnT'ILNT'IlSrP" IN,111YoK " TO SG USED rokt VENTILATION ONLY 10.0110-0.OVERHEAD DOORS TO BE USED PG VINTIGTION ON,— TO Be USED FOR VENTILATION ON1T talTAIXTUrr" Z•gNITLVIVNC.0'%Y . 0 NORTH ELEVATION SEA PACK CENTRE ? 9 9(? (??, q 0 Q 0...9FAACK SCREEN EGOND ,.2 , 0/.: 6 417 it_ 0 6 o —GUARDRAIL.TT. al' 9 9 Seattle Packaging I I I 1 ' I .rocci''' ' I ZgrUr"" I I I le oiOr 67 Go o i''Ivi 1 1 1 1 1 1 ....-”,=.1 TO MGM Corporation 0 . 011 0.11 t0Mg '""*.T"" 00 i —__EI,VAZ 1000 SW 43rd Street 11 I I I 1 I UN SIGAGE III . 1 • I / ' I .t : i "I . .' ' ...'iimillriiihr„aplig , ....... .a ,, . • • .. „..,.. .,xi, r _ . ,, , ,.: , Fl Renton WA 98055 ErInj.1111 _LI MiiiimmiiiIiilililiniiiiiiiir mild nomumi u u umniiiiiiimilionsumissisisomimumisi__-__ 11 111511.min•n „.,— .MI1_11,1=MINEESE 11111p1.1111111/firmiss ii IMLIII 'I I 1 I- I I IMINIMMINICUPIIMIE11.- I I I I..esnl I, •••••• __,.,, .-..1.7 4. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 sm.- 0 if 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 """LVATL`e'-'.= ,...,PLANTER WALL WI CM '''. 01, . . AU11.1.LIGHT BOLLARDS CAD RANTER PER ELEC.TTP 4ICTAL•GLAS9 AXIAL RI•11} WALL VO CAI 0 SOUTH ELEVATION MOP( EELL•FEE,trr. NORTH ,.. ‘ <11> T _ TO PAARPET 1 STUCCO-TV, I 0 1, INIINIIIIIIIIIII . Mk ilia' ‘21' E 1 FI:=:" carei.Ligitt linn-r10. _P9_, Bh:1•1. 13 1 lk Beer WAG ..... _...-.."=2,..... &stair Ina El ev•Mr I QV STUCCO-TT,I Milli _UAL PLFI ntry., _,B.2 8,11,..Z.V.JS KEY PLAN ) Scale:N.T.S. °ELEV.0 EAST&WEST ENTRANCE 0 ELEVATION 0 SOUTH ENTRANCE -.- 10/25/a sr E APPROVAL 12/5/00 DO 5.8, 12/20/128 PERMIT SET mom co SeT '9 C-' ..'?STUCCO.1TP I 0,",_, , T T T T A REPGDE GST GP 0 Gw, 0 A 4/28/00 ADDENDUM II .4\711/00 PERMIT RESILSION TO PAGPET REG GIT T GMT me caeLev,sso ,,,___i i±-..n. LI c> 0:, , BEYOND mem TfP i =0;47BE REMOVED-\ , ptri,:aR Ico.T„e I I I NEP i , 1 • -r JP i if,,NEW OPEN.vi STOREFRONT ,..,.... L I I_ J .....,0S..., ._ &PAULL COTE- , DS iii iii RR.. 1 i . 1101111 • : .. Uri _ , iimvin ggstit,AL,B'o.B_,ISM i El j — .... STUC.;--TTPE, 0 0 0 mum vet km-FRASIDY0 0 0 PER me.Tr8 A k.A.Nokk4 , 0 EAST ELEVATION _ _— -— - — - - an MIMIC) A (7 T T ..UNIT (Pc, 4?60 ; '9CCENTTPC I .. 1 IZASIPVG 77111gt MEITI.GLASS [SST FIBERGLAS'? 9 RELOCATED PIBERG4SS CANOPY T-RELOCATED FIBERGLASS CANOPY- -,LOGTED FIDESS4SS CANOPY- Cr) MT CONE BETOND—\ AC TONG',REFER CMG,TO MAIN, PANELS.TTP 1 TUS MCC. E 1 I I 11 1 -MOWN,DOCK DOOR •EXRE,RITE ORER ERR. RELOCATED DOCK DCO ° n'N'O' r i ( °' ?" - -:-*1 it----1` e, BUILDING ELEVATIONS .I. '7 gl"". I L . . , ., j ii MiffM1 MOM Plinr/---, ,,.A.I''; ', '.L,. Fill --"Mill IL I-- a _ _ _ ---,— --- — — t I AM W. 99065 .48, Gt ... ' I I I.AI 4t \\T" 1 -Aw, .,7,-//w, --,,,,,s," %....0 --T--1,--- -- 1-,_„,,,,,,, , I":garg 0 MIT FIXTURE PER ELEC."RP LEXST STAIR\-UST OPEMNO TO BE 0,11.6.ED 4 LAWNS %V/YR PRAWNS 6 SILCCO-TTPE 1 ' 0 ®WEST ELEVATION A . CO SET ..-0..........- . . ''''''':‘•'16'':''":;:;•':::".'`.1. ::::::,..J 1121,:-,i t:i::,...::i::1'..; .:,.;' -----:.- - - - 9'9-456 iI ' I ' AL lil,l' 144A � - s II PpI I O C 2I I I RECEN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PARKING STUDY ii for I I SeaPack Centre Building, 9! I I I I I I I I I I Prepared for', Seattle Packaging Corporatior ? and Mithun Partners I I I b' Ili I I October 18, 1999 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I - - I y PARKING STUDY for SeaPack Centre Building Renton, WA Prepared for: Seattle Packaging Corporation and Mithun Partners October 18, 1999 Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 (425) 821-3665 FAX: (425) 825-8434 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Overview and Study Purpose 1 Study Results 1 EXISTING BUILDING 2 Description 2 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 2 Conclusion 2 PROJECT PROPOSAL 3 Description 3 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 3 Parking Demand for the Building 4 Conclusion 4 TRUCK IMPACTS 5 i I Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Overview and Study Purpose This studydocuments the parkingimpacts of the proposal SeaPack Centre project. P P P Both employee parking impacts and impacts to truck delivery vehicles are identified. 1The purpose of the parking study is to evaluate the parking requirements of the existing site and to evaluate the impacts of the proposed project, which includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building ("Building") which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot (gsf) structure, 3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur, and 38,1001 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas, the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nsf) of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. The Building is located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43rd Street in Renton. This report is separated into three distinct areas. The first identifies the parking requirements of the existing site, which contains a 363,150 nsf warehouse. The second evaluates the parking requirements of the proposed Building. The third area evaluates the projects impact to truck deliveries and access. The formal Land Use submittal, which will include a copy of the existing site plan and the proposed Building plan, is currently scheduled for October 25, 1999. Study'1 Results Parking Impacts of Existing Site. The parking study demonstrates that the existing parking supply of 269 striped stalls exceeds the City's parking code requirement of 242 stalls for the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. Parking Impacts of the Proposal. The future proposed parking supply of 245 stalls is 65 stalls less than the City's parking code requirement of 310 stalls for the expanded Building, which would contain warehouse and manufacturing operations. As such, a modification to the City's parking code requirement is requested such that parking on the site only be provided to accommodate the projected future employee parking demands of the proposed SeaPacl Centre Building. Truck Impacts. Parking stalls are not recommended in directly line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side of the Building so that the entire 95-foot depth can be used for truck maneuvering. .M:1991992951WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 1 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 EXISTING BUILDING Description . The existing building, which contains 363,150 net square feet (nsf) of area, will be used by Seattle Packaging Corporation to consolidate some of its manufacturing and warehousing operations. Employees and trucks are expected to use the existing driveways for access to and from the site. The existing parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls, which includes stalls on the north side of the Building in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. City of Renton Parking Code Requirements Section 4-4-080 (Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations) of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parking requirements for the existing building. The City's parking requirements for warehouse space is 1 staff for every 1,500 nsf of building area. Since the existing building has 363,150 nsf, a total of 242 parking stalls are required. Conclusion The existing site parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls. The use of the existing building as a warehouse would require a minimum of 242 parking stalls according to City Code. Since the existing parking supply exceeds the City's minimum requirement of 242 stalls, no additional parking would be required to serve the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. II , M:199199295IWPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 2 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 PROJECT PROPOSAL Description The proposal includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building ("Building") which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot (gsf) structure, 3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur, and 38,100 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas, the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nsf) of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. The parking on the north side of the Building includes spaces in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. City of Renton Parking Code Requirements Section 4-4-080 of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parkin requirements for the Seapack Centre proposal. The table shown below summarizes the parking requirements of the site based on City code and the planned use of the building. Note that the net square footage (nsf) of the manufacturing space includes 27,782 nsf of office space (about 7 percent of the total nsf of the Building), which would support both the manufacturing the warehousing operations. Parking rates for manufacturing and warehousing uses typically allow for about 5 to 15 percent of the total building space to be used by ancillary office uses to support.the primary operations. Since the 7 percent office space for the Building falls at the lower end of this range, the parking required to support the primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and the supporting operation (office) would be sufficient to accommodate both. Use Size(nsf) City Code Requirement No.Stalls Required Manufacturing* 150,971 nsf 1 stall per 1,000 nsf 151 Warehousing 237,936 nsf 1 stall per 1,500 nsf 159 Total 388,907 nsf 310 *I Includes 27,782 nsf of office space to support the manufacturing and warehousing operations,which is 7%of total nsf. According to City Code, the SeaPack Centre proposal would be required to provide 310 parking istalls to serve the Building's manufacturing and warehousing uses, which is 65 more than proposed: Approval of the proposal, then, will require a parking modification. M:1991992951WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 3 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 Parking Demand for the Building To estimate the parking demand of the proposal, the parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were determined separately. This was done for both the existing employment levels and the future projected employment of the Building at full buildout. Note also that about seven percent of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. Existing employment levels reflect the use of the Building in the year 2000. Future buildout of the project would occur after about ten years, and would result in maximum employment levels for the Building. Existing Employment. The existing parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses was determined based on the current employment levels of each use, as provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. Using the existing employment data, the hourly parking demands were determined for each use based on the various shifts and support staff serving them. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 161 vehicles. Future Employment. Future employment levels were estimated according to projections provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. They expect 40 percent growth in manufacturing and 75 percent growth in warehousing. Using these future employment projections, the hourly parking demand for each use was determined. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 229 vehicles. 1 Conclusion The existing site contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to Ibe acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. M:199199295''WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc.1999 Page 4 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 TRUCK IMPACTS Section 4-4-080-J4 of the City of Renton Land Use Code identifies a minimum 100-foot back-out distance for trucks at dock-in loadings. Since the current distance from the west edge off the existing building to the west property line is 95 feet, delivery trucks that currently use the loading docks are not in conformance to current City Code. The existing loading docks on the west side of the Building would remain with the project proposal, and five additional double-wide dock doors are proposed. !Seattle Packaging uses the following three types of trucks or truck/trailer combinations for deliveries: 1,1. Large combinations with a 16-foot truck and 48-foot trailer (64-feet total). 2. Medium size combinations with a 16-foot truck and 32-foot trailer (48-feet total). 13. Small box truck with a 12-foot truck and 28-foot trailer (40-feet total). Due to the need for additional parking stalls on the site to accommodate future employment levels, additional parking stalls were initially identified along some of the area on the west site property line adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. With standard 20-foot long parking stalls, about 75 feet of depth (95-feet existing less 20-foot long parking stalls) would be available for truck maneuvering at those dock doors directly in-line with the parking stalls along the west property line. Based on typical turning radii of 41 to 45 feet for a WB-50 truck (50 feet in total length), the entire 95-foot of existing depth would be needed to accommodate back-in and pull-out truck maneuvers. As such, parking stalls are not recommended in directly; line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side of the Building so that the entire 95-foot!depth can be used for truck maneuvering. • M:1991992951WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 5 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL PLAN PROJECT TEAM INDEXM OWNER STRUCTURAL/CIVIL AO-- "• a a B I ~ I w xw«s L°0n cn >MeT'.wa n Aoo sUnvli COVER sH SHEET N I T HUN r.'..... 5 w • 1 w M a r M EOM v ,a :nPo N %M m k 13 Z Z ''I i 8 \ + '•n°^ COM -ao sRUCNRAL eNGINPPRING i....i.....,.. > e 2 k g �R m ,�:/. a7,1..__41c_ __s r wa xiKu n u nxx o want ve CIVIL —w < 6 y �.e 1 I' y//%�' p-t,-_ - :'_;_'_ �,_ .uu,u,ne [xlNileiaaa a w+ciiLWm'Pcn C1R CONCEPTUAL GRADING.DRAINAGI.6 UTILITIES PLAN w — t I° ,.-. - CITY OF RENTON: xla�exlNcaweeni"e �. w B U L I P G 0 2 3 1 F Z wi.T"o,N,66, L 0meea g S..iniAN ASSOCIATE.16 III Ur x,. ,. _ I, E'NTC.^.ASHINGT"a MSS GEOTEaC SUM LANDSCAPE :6411klb' / 1 i PLANNING/BUILDING L-1 PLANTING PLAN —_— r 11 ~ M / /' E 3 SEAM Co•l ie•i euu°No L-2 PLANTING PLAN y s.w 3erH sr. i/ N 61 R T I ASSISTANT • Bo1aw N UT w PLANTING SCHEDULE 1�/ J i -- °ex"Tn SERVICES DIVISION [a+c n,ALvp a 2e+NL Pe L-5 EXISTING PLANTING MATERIALS PLAN / 5/ I ' PAX�i::si:st]'imoo LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT T J 2 0 _ d{/ 3 Ii FIRE PREVENTION BOpEAU MR•10 BAI6 PC xane 1 CC VIZ fa r a/'N. / - �� PACs LC•AY _ rF-�1 lin Kw q In f•° - 39TH ST. a SW m 3ST ST— e _. A• N,x o x 0 e x' ar. cc,,,,,,aloes ammo A'sA ARCHITECTURE O O ARCHITECT AtO _ ...+ \vx //- - MAM uMe ac _ 0 All PR STING SITE PLAN •.� In L - ° }t �Pj I -\ ouve IS Se ELEVATIONS r \V pLLL I I TRAFFIC ENGINEER EXISTING BUILDING eLEV (-•1 _ • Tn.,mro cln[.,we PROPOSED SITE PLAN --Q •"'°" -+• " r ` -� - - w SNNiuT.(40 10 PROPOSED FIRST B SECOND Level_PLANS _ i -3 �.S I -_ oe ev a21 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN . _.� _�_.- 2 �'�io,Pe'm"eM"."'.ce. � j r _ i � ORILLIA I ® COMMeovta CONSTRUCTION CO.w .Y- 8 SURVEOit • t. Ar"x yam✓ _ OF RE NTONS DI V.I "." A60 MYL xw" A60 PROPOSED BUILDING SECtI0N5 u4 „• D jf' l U FJ ._- R �H.S.W. GIST ST. I • SW 41ST “"r Pitmen o" NAax.7-0 00101 _l 'D D D N 4 I l K ! ` t. i. O ` t • wl,T.cr,eoa WINTERS 51 I. ti ,1 --_ -v: j Q � \\ _- PROJECT DATA ABBREVIATIO.NS U - v E Rm•ee-,Ip•,ear --- >!\ Q c 4 '-- PROJECT ADDRESS 1000 SW 43rtl STREETPAIL 6.3AL d �`. %� ''- Q�\\ ` �+ - C N T�E R'/ F RENTON WA 08055 A� M 1111� Z JURISDICTION CITY OP RENTON p..( X} I , ananuzucu 1,1 (\ I APPLICABLE LODE UBC 1004 WITH AMENDMENTS , / J w•o u own a°�o, I U,II\ i - LAND USE CLASSIFICATION MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ZONE tar r"" NO0 ROOMED tss4 \O�i • - sl; �1I , LEGALDESCRIYl'lON O iWS MOANS i�oo�I • wS•�^ A+s ���\ v�-' •______�.r I 1� PARCEL A O __ I /a i w L _f� ,_� l- MINII C� r oeeooeo-oeov000000 ooe-eeoo°-A._up.-oe c+°-°eMFET'�L.._._:_ _._.- -a+II S.W. _ _ _43RD og000 Li.000 LI QUTHARTER OF SECTIONN ONE6 TOWNSHIHEAST O NORTH RANG N4 EAST. uM,t poo XCN .; .,- - QUARTER OF 36 TOWNSHIP 23 RANGE 4 EAST. III - -n x+r _ _ WM.KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.vonATc M� "' mYl COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST "O�" I n - ' �x y\ a QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5CJ. CONTROL APT a� _ial J r. • ni \Y A-.° SLYLR,.L 4 THENCE SOUTH 01'47'51'WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF a D �� II , 1176 B]FEET TO A LINE 48 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLELPOLY TOWELRTO/6 PAPER , xscn .. .� 0���� ' TO THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST CTIO ST SAID My CONOPLTC BLOC. i PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE PREFAB PREMNI6TED =I�i sI ++ u, /N EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE RECEPTACLE IOW/00 SITE APPROVAL, d MOO 'xr _ L l I ,at I !f/'// NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION Cora cmcnNuotts TRACT 0 -'°++- 31.TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH RANGE 5 EAST.NH AND RUNS THENCE sam \ av x n m WESTERLY.IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE 1 H \ 1 M I CENTERLINE OF THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITN THE SOUTH T-\\ ^^ 5P es /11Ir � LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 13 C,pW -•-- •'•-•' NORTH RANGE 4 EAST WMREP 11.6ENCE - ` t THENCE SOUTH 8EASJT EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ADISTANCE OF 14539 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF THeSC SCUD COPS WS I,IIIPIP -ma " SA D"PARALLELN INECE L6]0>61FEETNG OUTM 8036'3T EAST ALONGW 1aaL "�°x / THENCE NORTH OINE'167 EAST A DISTANCE 00501 FEET. 1srcNo" Q II . P— T T nil I Si+ THENCE NORTH 8836'3T WEST A DISTANCE OF 86F:FEET. mLAT EXTERIOR SEC SM. JD® THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF DS • 2 lei 5500 FEET.AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8600 FEET TXROVGX A RA-. ©9AR /.3 MOr•1° CENTRAL ANGLE OF BO�SJ3'TO A LINE 00 FEET EAST OF AND JB cgP'y Va- PARALLEL E THE N2TE LINE OP SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OP �s Y JQ• THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 38. (S 1G4TH 1 0°5I4 0 ..u ® _ I•_ _ FLAG. Pus.° maw STAIRWAY �A L[x D ®4 y,LJ — — —_'-} f-- THENCE SOUTH O1'4T51'WEST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF - I_I -=. _• �o _er,°�p Av - _-�-4,f _ - I. 70505 FEET_ - - ro10- -- _ I. = J FS I m oe°a. +,. aP< �% I THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OPINSTAL " •it W Q • 1 m e[D 1t1 .Eri, 1M 5500 FEET.AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8678 FEET THROUGH A TREAD rorz o .�,, 6 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0024'28.TO TRUE POINT OF THE BEGINNING FT FOOT.MT "BO I. W 1 I° RuxL,xwox xon1H[Ax v- �` fxOM•s[ I - ��', - I PARCEL BRA GAUGE TRW m1aWeW•xua 05[rx ll,A �� ASP GROSS mama FEET TO .OS. I7. 0 0 2 - RA L ® . , AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER.ACROSS.AND N = O 0 1 S 1 ._ -._ _ __...__ •E' �' '! _ UPON A STRIP OF LAND 00 FEET IN WIDTH.HAVING 45 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL COVER A ABOVE. WTI rr mo,T. SHEET VUT VERTICAL awF,r•aava I Sao' NRv loov a PMA. MOUT. T v,ieno• • WIDTH a0ox 00065 10/15/00 M� _. To U. A0-0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTlON._a-- M MITNUN 0, ID . ._ 0 ,) NORM .� o I._•,, SW. sr. 11 CI c\ ,> � fiffTlll --fJ'(TfI11T1 MITI — � --- —��-- Z J 1TTIITTTTI1T11ITTTT1T11 1111111111111111111 W L1ll Ulll J11U UlJ 0 2 D *a8 U b Li 1 pm- r1 F-1 LII PRO"• ED Qj '� QI PAR, =LA W A o L'i I ' : oI x KAM _ , � Q 14R5/99 SITE APPROvAL I.� mm frrill Glllllllll i wv --_ O eea•z,_ WO 90 -_-_ O ws �,� SW. 4RD Si-. -- „•— PARKING INPORYIATION JD - - - - -- - - ,��--Nt EXISTING PARKING DETAIL CHADTYICK& WINTERS �� : PROPOSED PARCEL A w ND SURVSYJSRO OW NI, +NC, INC. VSZIAA 1 J IaN: l)[ - S£AEPIGGGRtl ruc[ ivim•1 fieuuv....ow su WIT SURVEY 99055 . m/x5/99 A0.1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION�,.._-..._ Call M z I . before you i ViiiTg•V. f't 'n ......c...,..„...,1-800-424-5555 — -—--—--—--—--—--—--— •'•"••• Ti':;III',,,,,,,. i-:750-0471 ..... • SCALE 1-40• ............ , f 1 rt 10 -JI OWNER ,..,...,....... ' , ''.• AtAWA.1.1.1 ST HUH ....., -,,, I VA)AS-YO3 I I'-1 /I_I,j L t k. —,77 1 .4 ,-, rl-T-, 1 , 1 , 5 - 11 `----...+111 I FT11 r Mali . 211 PW SKR SAI 9A C I 1:=0.%1,. I . '-_r_ - Kr i t Kr W.V.9111.1 • DM YA-DA0 on.lea comm • ..,c,--1,---'--•-.• 1 AlrliTECT .t.s• 1 'I L- I I- — -... ': " T T .„..".., , , .,... ., .....,.......t. ..." . 4,4 PM Pi SIM SW AA111.'LA 13101 PA)623-15. I I i ! ... ' I 1 _ \,...,.. ',. ...'...........-.....- _ - --- L.ECEILI cT4 0 U //t .. „ . ,. .. MAYA MAC I._ I lAsAl =VT AIAP .. .: .. z f I . .:Li.j.',i•— , ....... l' 'I H SW f•dr 1 I al d -_, I Z%'.11 -. -1- . -1 c„„..,„,,,, __ _ __ , .... , ,___ 9/67ST Z ° . . .. .. ., . - .. .. CAA OX•. .. '• .. L: :. ..: :. ;4:P:6;.5..•'- i •-••••J :! T 1- LOAM MG..LIM - ' b' :',iii i:C:.','• 1 1 I 1 I '-' ..._,, Y , __., SA MOS -''' : :,. ,, .. " .. .. .. „ .. „ .. .. „ .. „ I- ij bJD P4 ; . `1: ' VI 1 tj 7 1 t ; ; • ' , Du _ ,..,-...... •• .: : :. . .. .:, •e = -_- 65 VAA(AlleR A. -C. . 14 13 ., s__I,_.(1_,—s _.__ _is_ II - " •. " .: 1,,,,,,,,,,,ye:., , ... . .. ... _ 7 T .. .. . • i I -4- i I r-'-''.•.'7;:' , sur ur.Aspar:-, . . *-)e( TA..m.o.. I, r. :T. •0 . ( 'V va .. , ., . SWAY 9I SAUL ... i l'"1 A SC1 0C) .. .r. t SEE ACIA WAS ma ataxerm. I V/ 0 t 1 . • ill 1 I'l „ .. .. .. .. , .. .• - - , r.• .. . -. . - , .. IIIII I . - .. , ,, ,-__ ,. . _ _ , -.. I' 10/15/313 SITE APPROVAL 1 ', :''•V'''' 'I I .-L - .. '..-.1 = ,.. " „ .. . .. . ....1 .. ., . .. .. . i -i ,I-111 . . -- 5'. _ _:-. /'--,-- 7 : 1r., ,.__ . •• .. .. I• ± ., .. ., .. .: •• .• : . .. ,. .. .. - . _ I=`•=',A 111. , .. SCP _ , I i st= I I ' ' - . .. • ''1-1 I 11 1 .• „ • :: • .1.4 .. .. .. . .. . ,. A.21.ft -... -." I ' A“•,..qy y; ,1 I I I' , 1 IT '1111T ,, .: ... :: - Ek us w-rm To er .,macro 17,s4 " on ro DE sgsraex • . ,1 COUOINLIMPORWILUMIMEN IrEFSZIVI I J' 1 1 I : 1.97.91 AWL A.,,,,,,...,,A, . 1 ' E.= i 44,, ______ __ ______ - - -.-,- . 1.63.ft.6 RR WOW. •-- . •...... .' - 66,---- e- !'i r..-I:-:4 I''''1 1„,„„z„ : 1 ..1.-I I I_ . , 0 •:::,:::,,, 11'".f.r.''''''''''''' 476 V.......... '. -.'''' .. •' .'‘.•.''. ..'1 ,2V.,.ZA ., . .. '.-,' '..ri;,,,: iiip!•,1 or i'l ------ . ___ :.-1.—. 1 mm-, ._,-•__,.. =re—' ;,:z ' . M PR-cIlRialtIiMl IW- M '` ,r,_L _1____ •, __ ______ CONCEPTUAL 1 , — - - __ ______ GRADNG,DR AINAGE AND UTILITIES PLAN INA t'l*---co.“.,r,...)....I, *K. E.,11.7' '•---- ; --__ 5511,0_027.12 I tagsre sva sweet*-114.r _Nara an-Fat,,,,,-- - ,., NOM - , 96.61,051 .1.11,09, MSS PIM 6 HA NI ACTUAL MP(PREMED BY A ...,.. loam mama'ono 127.: PROSIS931.ASPAYDR.MS PAN INS BM CREATED CrA6So.1 -- -- -——— MY AN MING MIT RECORDS MO DEM PINS Alt ili.Vs PREP/RD ST ACK MAMA DATED S-12-76 AC,AL VW 0,SAO 11 6 PIE 0311MACIORS C 1 2 Pfs...111,WW1 Ultrl MAIM P1 NE _ FOLl sr..IL - ill gi ZI. .... • -- --•-• TREE TRUNK MULCH TREE RING SHALL BE 2"OUTSIDE OF MULCH TREE RING SHALL BE 2"OUTSIDE OF CHALK LOCK BY LISTER/2 TREE RE TREE STAKES CNN N LOCK BY LISTER/2 TREE A S I1 0 I I(II F TIE.INSTALL PER NM'S L TREE STAKES ROOTBA SECURE PER WOOD TAKE INSTRUCTIONS. TREE TRUNK it ` SECURE TO WOOD STARE E PER /2 NANEVAONS.SECURE TO WOOD I J PENNY COMMON NAIL(ONE PER STARE). R�TB/WL STAKE NiM/I PENNY COYNON /pTS(X1JI Iy[IlII{yp8{ MNNTAX 1"CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE 1►A '' NPJL(ONE PER STAKE) NANTAN II1191411 i /� TREE TRUNK M OHM LOCK ` '\ I�A N`�'4 1"CLEPFPNCE OEIWEEN ME �N' I�III' Q TREE MUNK h CHALK LOCK. T LBvY IODGEPOLE PINE THEE STARES. \111�� 11F/ TOP OF ROOT CROWN TO BE PLAN 2"DU DOWELED STARE W/CHPNFERED L N,`II� I1,A 1'HIGHER THAN FlNISH GRADE TOP.6"CONICAL POIM k PRESSURE w /I� _IFIFI' I � BVC LOOGEPOLE PINE TREE STAKES. 2"MULCH DEPTH. 2"DIA DOWELED STAKE W/ KEEP MULCH LAYER TREATED pL�N CHPNFERED TOP,6"CONICPL POINT AWAY FROM FOLIAGE h PRESSURE TREATED • I �"_ /iI 11111 8 111111111 8 11 INL i.I U1111111111111111111111111111U , ` CHNN LOCH THEE TIE SECURE TO 2"DA WOOD STAKES IIIIII IIIIII �Il rFlNISH GRADE h i TR 2"DIA WOOD STARES KEPT CLEAR OF ROOTBNI. HNN LOCK TREE TIE SECURE TO 2"DIA WOOD STAKES _ -llAilt11111=11=11= f b S? TREE TRUNK_"I' TOP OF ROOT CROWN TO BE 1"HIGHER THAN FINISH - ]''� OPEN BURW AROUND TRUNK. _ I �'� G 2 c = �J�li 1-" CUT M REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP TOP OF ROOT CROWN TO BE 1"HIGHER THAN FlNISH GIME. 2-MULCHI GRADE SLOPE TO DRAIN _}I.- SLOPE TO GRAIN 2"DIA WOOD STAKES KEPT CLEAR OF ROOTBLLL FERTIN2ER,12P.THOROUGHLY MIX INTO 2"MULCH �� FlNISH GRADE in z --��-\ BACNFlLL a II�111I 1.1��I,I III _ W _-- p�1� iLl�llcH ,� __ ~FlNISH GRADE jII"�GI EXISTNG SOIL2THOROUGHLY wA'TER SETTLE g '-IEri!� � Y Ltin N g 'i! �� •PEN BURLAP AROUND TRUNK.CUT Sc REMOVE TOP LANRNG HOLE YIIO� 0 E BURLAP MOUND TRUNK.CUT k REMOVE TOP [N-, I i/J OF BURIFP /3 OF BURLAP g EL T BE 6"LARGER THAN UNDISTURBED EXISTING TO S BOIL OR EXISTING Id FERTILIZER,IYP.THOROUGHLY MIX INTO BACKFlLL -�j' `'AE y FERTILIZER,TYP. uw, SECTION DIA OF ROOTBALL SOIL COMPACTED TO BST MAX.DENSITY ry ___ THOROUGHLY MIX INTO SACKFUL II LI1 1_11X - FOR GROUNDCOVER • I� BILKFlLL W/2/J PUNTING SOIL 6 1/3 EXISTING SOIL. 1It LARGER THAN flALKFlLL W/2/3 PLANTING SOIL h i/]EXISTING I. l THOROUGHLY WATER SETTLE D.OF ER TBALL SOIL THOROUGHLY WATER SETTLE UNDISTURBED EXISTING THAN GREATER FOR SHRUBS UNDISTURBED EXISTING SOIL— BOIL OR EXISTING SOIL THAN U6L OF 1.--� OR EXISTING SOIL COMPACTED �.36"GREATER�. COMPACTED TO BST -ROOTBALL 0 BST MAX.DENSITY THAN D.OF MAX.DENS _ 1/'_1. Ste"+ to T�L SECTION G- _+ SECTION GROUNDCOVER & SHRUB 1„ A O CONIFER TREE PLANTING DETAIL O DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL O PLANTING DETAIL ,� 2 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE - NOT TO SCALE ' .` CE V 8 T r O S \1 !� \� � t II I �\\ ii I � I f_ • r/1 o .. CONIFER TREE PLANTING T may `•V`\ Z 1YP. \.`1 \.ALL 1� - a 1KC,JA uwzrAn�wwrt 1 I J DmTIUTF Zr.178 _ �_�_ + A DECIDUOUS TREE • ®PL000NC•ETAIL YIP. Hough Bock �5y d[BiW SIG :*:;1 I I 0 I I uromw[ •'�F y'3 ft. J J L_ _ — — — L g'•% .\\� PLANTING :„, -. SEE SHEET L-3 FOR MII11 ', -�j 1 PLAN ®f—®-.•Y I — — ®GROUNOCOVER ,HRUB 'SCALE'—I'=ZOO s:2 � PLANT SCHEDULE, NOTES ®PUNTING DET L P. 9922 ABBREVIATIONS & LEGEND Ie1 1om/I, I11 _ • --1 - - - - - - ; _ ,- 111 - MAT 4 HLIN= L-2 SITE APPROVAL SUBMITTAL:_,'_.,I ._ -- CH IT lAyAv ..: i..,a37 FOR COMOTRBDCTOOPL-- —; I j 0 MATCHLINE L-1 _ �, 7 -, 1 ) III III — L s no rn �;:zlim I.CI.. ' ...-c C 0 'C 9 C + 0 0 9 0 C nr_va` ' ' s - T 1 SD I I v —=fi:Ba5-..AI III — — a''�CONIFER TREE tRPNRN\I� �] I0 0 C C - 0 0 C 0 0 ®, a III C Z 1 1 I �I I 1 11 II II .igOO� -- � 0 0 C 0 T1 C C C Hu !1 1 0 I (�l C?A Poi U 9 1 0 = 1 I r C J , O I ! 01)PEiANTING o a'm., V vGi b PI Z11. II o 0 I 1.\ A I+ \ ' I - . ._ 1 I .�' I ' I C C u I L 1 N I 1 I I I ._ N / SEE SHEET L-3- FOR c,\ --T— - ,, PLANT. SCHEDULE; NOTES -- ABBREVIATIONS de LEGEND I' I II >�� d_ E Ine. i_ f j ,, u-+- I - EXISTING TREES ILO1ill` l� I '�' y.;-.�:.. ... r�..I`i�'_/1. REMAIN-SEE CAL 1'_�t_i-1--d_{ \Y "'PLANTING � _-�_p�, _� � �La-J- _J_JJY J� `�- "l,a°" f GRF r-L-- �--I , ,.,1 PLAN .�`+ j y a' ....it' .. ` 'Pi. , .�,',:-. I • .; ._y ��_,_ L_ - I) 3.•.\\i 1 SCALE:_1"=20' .� ,.� ,•r n . _�_`_._WIN --�- -�---�-F�-4-- L__L \ I 4 \'�":k,�'.� '�' :!"jl:'p ny ®GROUNOCOVERf SHRUB - _ 99I9 �- f1 .�;. ' \ - - E';✓.-``b�',.� -•}.,-ff �" 1 PLANTING DETAIL.-TYP. fix•"'x :a, ,:w•x .-..>:,x^,x• :e. - .. w a '- , ` -eez 7i :mra:. cexxars>�;. a ; . �.. ....... ..................:s., :....,::....::. ���"\',+i' %a:.lp���^... ...,,..................,...,..,.,,.,...... c':;......V"'-'�'�...,..ij;s;urcrt.. .,.. .,.........; aa\ 1 k — gt?� A i I 1'n •L-2� t \ M w �f h } SITE APPROVAL SUBMITTAL '-•— NOT FOR COROITR DCTIO,M—o_---. oh SET !,i PLANTING SCHEDULE 9{((JJ{�ty{5 Ifl ll�1i s SYM. CITY. SCIENTIFIC/COMMON NAME SIZE/REMARKS SYM. QTY. SCIENTIFIC/COMMON NAME SIZE/REMARKS SYM. QTY. SCIENTIFIC/COMMON NAME SIZE/REMARKS �11C11d1�l)itI I 1 TRFFS ,EU$5 yyy^^^�yY,, GROUNfX:fIVFRS f(.}} 30 Calocedrus decurrens/ 6'-8'Ht.;B&B/Cont.;Straight ® 27 Thuja ccidentalis'Emerald 4'-5'Ht.;B&B/Cont.; t00R Hypericum lycinum/ 4"Pot;Full,well branched& t �✓J INCENSE CEDAR trunk not sheared.Symmetrical Green'/ Full,well rooted&well ST.JOHNSWORT well rooted.Triangular Y 9u Spacing '.� Full&well branched. EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE branched. at 18"O.C. A� ".,'4(15%) Ceratostigma plumbagnaides/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well r � 8 Magnolia grandiflora'Edith 1 3/4"Cal;B&B;Full,well • 10 Parthenocissus tricuspidata 1 Gal.Cont.;Min.(our(4) LEADWORT branched&well rooted.Plant Bogue./ branched&well rooted.Straight 'Green Showers/ runners/Min.Ten(10)inch % t O 18"O.C.triangular GREEN SHOWERS BOSTON IVY lengths, gu spacing. EDITH ROGUE EVERGREEN central leader& single trunk. 9 well roofed (30%) Liriope us ari/ 1 Gal.Cont.; Full,well MAGNOLIA Symmetrical branching habit. LILYTURF branched&well rooted.Plant 13 Rhododendron yakushimanum 21"to 24""Spread; ® 18"O.C.triangular spacing. ® 'Ken Janeck'/ B&B/Coot.;Full St well / (26%) Coreopsis rticullala 1 Gal.Cont.; Full,well 5 Styrax japonicas/ 1 3/4""Cal;B&B;Full&well KEN JANECK RHODODENDRON branched. 'Moonbeam'/ branched&well rooted.Plant '' JAPANESE SNOWDROP branched.Symmetrical branching / MOONBEAM COREOPSIS ® 18"O,C.triangular spacing; qw/ habit. 0 58 Nandina domestic°'Firepower'/ 2 Gal.Cont.;Full,well /*(30%) Sedum 'Autumn Joy'/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well FIREPOWER HEAVENLY BAMBOO branched&well rooted. % AUTUMN JOY SEDUM branched&well rooted.Plant ® Spacing at 30"O.C. ® 18"O.C.triangular spacing. 4 Styrax obassia/ 1 3/4- Cal;B&B;Full&well 6 u 5 Gal.Cont.;Full,well 100% TOTAL FRAGRANT SNOWDROP branched.Symmetrical branching O+ Viburnum plicatum tomentosum rooted&well branched. / Z O In habit Sh h i% ,/ Crocus sp./ Top sized bulbs-Locate per c SHOSHONI JAPANESE SNOWBALL BULBS CROCUS(PURPLE COLOR VARIETY) LA.field directive. ,� p r� Prunus lourocerasus'Otto -21"Spread; / 200 Narcissus p./ Top sized bulbs-Locate per Cd G1 8 Liquidambar tyraciflua 1 3/4"Cal;B&B;Full&well �' 145 BULBS DAFFODIL ICE FOLLIES A 'War lesdon' Symmetrical g Luyken'/ B&B/Cont.;Full&well ( ) L.A.L.A field directive. p / branched.S t' 1 branching OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL branched. 0 WORPLESDON SWEET GUM habit. ���(.100% Epimedium x rubrum/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well }--I O vaan © 15 Rosa rugosa'Buffalo Gal'/ 1 Gal.;Cont.;Full,well "'^^v v brnched&well rooted.Single O w 14 Ater c nalum/ 6'-8'Ht.B&B;Full&well BUFFALO GAL SEA TOMATO rooted&well branched. rowat 15"O.C. A � r l VINE MAPLE branched.Multitrunked w/2 m ;tt]Itlpt;*100% Festuca o i o glauca/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well !'U C' 1 Gal.;Cont.;Full,well ELIJAH BLUE FESCUE branched&well rooted. '' trunks. 13 Hamamelis intermedia/ '••••• Triangular Spacing at 18"O.C. e ® DIANE WITCH HAZEL rooted. //����//// 100% Ilex crenate'Helleri% 1 Gal.Cont.;Full.well '1^. d 111 7 Zelkovo serrate'Green Vase% 1 3/4"Cal;B&B;Full&well fffff HELLERI HOLLY branched&well rooted. /( VW�/.•JJ GREEN VASE ZELKOVA branched.Symmetrical branching Viburnum tinus'SpringBouquet./ S Gal.;Cont.;Full,well Triangular Spacing at 18"O.C. 11 ///r��QI. �x habit. • 91 SPRING BOUQUET VIBURNUM rooted&well branched. [..:-,,,,,,,,A 100% Pennisetum alopecuriodes'Moutlry'/ 2 Gal.Cont.;Full,well V '>7 "`�`��``' MOUDRY FOUNTAIN GRASS branched&well rooted. ^Cd� rA • 28 Rhododendron'Scintillation'/ 18"to 21"Spread; Triangular Spacing at 30"O.C. 1-� "4 N.C.N. B&B/Cont.;Full&well I *100% Goultheria shallon/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well Q) branched. SGI 01 branched&well rooted ABBREVIATIONS Triangular Spacing at 24"O.C. 100R Epimedium x youngianum'Niveum'/ 1 Gal.cont.;et Ili cd p "'I NIVEUM EPIMEDIUM branched well& rooted. r^ O NUMBER DIA. DIAMETER MIN. MINIMUM v J C� % PERCENT DRWG'S. DRAWINGS NO. NUMBER Triangular Spacing at 18"O.C. ^ & AND EA, EACH 0.C. ON CENTER - *100% Azalea'Pink Gpo/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well ® AT EXIST'G. EXISTING P.S.I. POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PINK GUMPO umAZALEA branched&well rooted.Single APPROX. APPROXIMATE FT. FOOT PVC POLYVINriCHLORIDE row at 18"O.C. MIN B&B BALLED AND BURLAPPED GAL GALLON QTY. QUANTITY _ arne CAL. CALIPER GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE R. RADIUS wQ 100% Erica a'SprinHEATH Pink'/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full, ote CENTERUNE HT. HEIGHT SCHED. SCHEDULE z SPRINGWOOD PINK HEATHER branched&well rooted.Single ll a C.F. CUBIC FOOT L.A. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHT. SHEET ••• row of 18"O.C. CONC. CONCRETE - MAX. MAXIMUM SPECS. SPECIFICATIONS *100.4 Bergen;a difolia/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well w xi • - CONT. CONTAINER MFR'S MANUFACTURER'S TYP. TYPICAL I' HEARTLEAFoBERGENIA branched&well rooted.Single W/ WITH row at 18"O.C. ®*100% Ceanothus gloriasus/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well LEGEND POINT REYES CEANOTHUS branched&well rooted. Spacing at 24"0.C. *100% unto minor/ 1 Gal.Cont.;Full,well DETAIL IDENTIFICATION DWARF PERIWINKLE branched&well rooted. SHEET IDENTIFICATION Spacing at 18"O.C. Where quantities are not shown in the Plant Schedule the Contractor AB shall be responsible for determining plant quantities to be used. .H" PLANTING NOTES LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS Percentages listed indicate percentage of total planting area to receive ;— plant materials. C.A 1.PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH SPRINKLER S.F.OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANTING 12220 S.F. IRRIGATION HEAD LOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS. AREAS REMOVED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION. 2.GROUNDCOVERS SHALL BE PLANTED IN A TRIANGULAR PATTERN AT SPACING S.F.OF NEW LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS 17.875 S.F. SHOWN IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE.WHERE GROUNDCOVER ABUTS CURBING, PROVIDED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION. WALLS OR WALKS,MINIMUM PLANTING DISTANCE SHALL BE NINE(9) —, INCHES FROM SAME.WHERE GROUNDCOVER ABUTS BUILDING WALLS CONIFER TREES REMOVED BY NEW 28 EA _ - - - — -- �` --- MINIMUM PLANTING DISTANCE SHALL BE 18".WHERE SHRUBS ABUTS CONSTRUCTION. BUILDING WALLS MINIMUM PLANTING DISTANCE SHALL BE 24". Hough BM( DECIDUOUS TREES REMOVED BY NEW 18 EA &Bahl hle. 3.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION CONSTRUCTION. WITH SUB-CONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING CONIFER TREES PROVIDED BY NEW 30 EAPIAMM OPERATIONS. °itiM°aM CONSTRUCTION. 4,ALL NEW PLAITING AREAS SHALL BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SEE SPECS. DECIDUOUS TREES PROVIDED BY NEW 38 EA. "'PLANING CONSTRUCTION. SCHEDULE g Y., 210 IUm As L-3 SITE APPROVAL SUBMITTAL `ter.`14.-- DO MT ROT FOR COPoOYRUC410NN._.o__-__ i ]" '''S tf tlL4{15Y fw�I i' N 9 111'I+N�lr�lJll�S P11;I��S iII: { 1 VN Q 1 �;,... 7 .,t.- f.,Tirrn :i,h-i I —1--1,. ,L ,I TiI I#r'� , � IM\ -;-4-!!I_ ! � . � � �1 . �I I I � �� /-�;'�I I I � I l� � "i I �•I I.' I I I I '��. r�, ' —c' — — a\ o t t1 1 E \ —o — i'" 11 f Z O N Fry O U oCd T 1 '` I T ,' I 1:1r .®= m"I _ �'t n it.—..@''' 1 — ''''.- 1 + it Cr) � S _ K. —;, JQ )��V LEGEND li T - EXISTING CONIFER TREE ` _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - ` O' EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE _ AAA f~ 1 _ .11 O EXISTING SHRUB -- ,H ! 1 • 9 _ _ E - -i - _ Q EXISTING SHRUB MASS m ,IlRough Beek 1 EXISTING_PLANT . �I 1 i ,1' "B�,d _ f MATERIALS_PLAN `AL1 �` I I® -, ♦i" ! l 1 �06 SCALE:_1'=40' $ f _ .ems 1' ,1 ' , vsu FAm on„e L-4 SITE APPROVAL SUBMITTAL no SETHOT FOR COG9O4RU68196y—e_ v. SW.♦Ial STREET lel022 Kr.. Hi/b fi H1(rF4 m 4 I.4� --JHfii-I+H H-H-f.,41 -�1 � j`'. 1_111-1-1-H_I MITHUN 114201.00011 Rj.. m� p�yJ Imo] .Ia�� . ; •...:, ......0 0 la ® to 17 O O .O ,I 1 vN°vr .I r..n.a....... ell KC209 MLA II I I 0. 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 i HHHHI IIIIIIIIII 1___ -- 1 .1 -- • -1-1�_1_-I—L_�1----1_ __1-1-_-I— ----11 �_ 1—L_-1--_-1 _ O-_ I IIIII Ill I III HIM I 11 • I I I I 1 I IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII 1 �' o � I fiifil1� ftf_ fii_ fit woo F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIII 1 1 ; -1111 1 U 1g WARR 1¢T211— 1 f.r n -_- 0_1-1-L_._l.-1 _ -1-1._ ° __1 _J—1—L_1—1---- I _-1—-I 0 _�r._W •I . r. := III IIIII IIIII III I L isoc•a I1 ' Me MIleUM' 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I ONAIII —,j IIIIIII IIIIIIII ! C) ' _ 1—+ fii fit f f t�i fii fit w �- m L_ I I I 1 I I ' CipVJ O IN �°�' I I 1 1 IIIIIIIIII 520211 1 ` __ ©- ---_ _1-1____1_1_1—_ -I—I _ 1� 1 1 1 1 1--I— •r 22 I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII 1_._1 O a EXISTING SITE PLAN NOTES o 1 ' 1 ' ' ' 1 1 1 I I I`I al 1 • lonsme SITE APPROVAL TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 668 500 GSF. - T- -�J - L J - 0 _�— -- I - I I .-L. FIRST FLOORIEXISTINGI 3]1.0]0 GSF. I ::© °_ tl it—TI- -}I—iI -iI o _ SECOND FTING BUILDINGSTINGI 0 GSF. I �-- 1 I I I I L TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGEE OFGE OF LOT COVERAGE OVERAGE 56% G S FPE _ TOTAL SQUARER FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA563576 GSF I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 233054 GSF. MG°en° O la - TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 605504 GSF. I I I I I I I I I I ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED •I I I� 1 I I 1 i`'•� 1 O , ,r r. 1-1y 1 1 Ij }I 1 1I EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT IT-0' 1 D - ws BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE � _ ARTERIAL STREETS 20' r Am�.lb I OTHER STREETS 15• I 1 1 1 1 I ..P-. EXISTING BUILDING SETBACKS OF FRONT I 1 I II I I I I I JD t115'SIDE �`� 00'REAR wmeunxo¢lern e Nee 1 0 _ . --1_-I—L_y _ �1 1_1 1 1-1.__1 -1-1_ 0 ° 1_1-- —L_ —L_-1— _ O_ B III II 1111111 II CATCH uwt m. I I I I EXISTING PARKING AN ALYSIS I I II _ I 1 I _1I O- __ __ _-_ __ DST 2B COMPACT STALLS II6FI 0 I[--1 _i_ -Li_[- —_I--_[_y_LI _-__I_L-L.I=_ h�C 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 0 TOTAL STALLS 260 1 I I 1111111 I I I I I I I I m fu ,° o ° ° IXI$11NG arc 1 --- I 9h PLAN �. . 11 1 •1 111 1 1'r•11.1 ' lid 1 MEN'.. I'd l 1 11r':I.I id , 'id i1 .. f IIIII YY06e 0 ® ®- -- d--® '® ® fs. 10° 0 0 m to 'm..- m v e m.. i 0 4 m1 I ___ °EXISTING GROUND FLOOR&SITE PLAN yt ro.�.eo. -1-1J-k---, !....11)--1-1 IJ 1;' '---,---111-- ---,--I- I-I 1-------1-1---4N/ ' ',, Al.0 ——— NOT FOR CONSIRIICTION�.__.�_ SW 43r0 STREET U.OP PROPOSED ADOITICO1-, M (� ! (� B (� (� (� (t0� (� R ! 15 D ) B Y O 2t R2 R! M I T HUN 7 7 T 7 7 7 7 �a� ....... .. I I ;1 11 1 I1 + + I + + + 1 1 ---1-- I ..^ ^...... I I I I I ��I e }� l I I I I IIVII I III In ItI�I I� I I 4 1 I I U I I I I I I I I I 11 eel I I ---------- °SOUTH ELEVATION :.i-Si%L171‘ ,, m,a LINE O...OP«DO.00mo. K R! R 2 O D o o 6 o o TR t 00000 O O O O O K.r-.� < .0 ,W \I I -1-- -1 1 { { - 1 + + + + ----I--}--- I 1 I- I IJ 1 °7� i hi iil I 1 I � I Uii �!�°° zI l 1 I � I 1A1 I _ W 8 O Q ®NORTH ELEVATION - Nt•< U V v • i � owm. .CPD.�m. U 77T T ?\ ? T7T T TT T :,___, m i���i��ii i��i��i �ter- W cl O OWEST ELEVATION ti r/1 O 11> uXe Or v.OvoxO AMMON toissroo srte nrr2ovn� /� D C D E F MC o.nomneo w G H J K L M N - �� • Ws J O EAST ELEVATION y. d D�, Os cs JD 11 Iiillii 11111 . . 1111EXISTING BUILDING I I I 1 I I I I I 1 ELEVATIONS tanDRD °BUILDING SECTION y Ar_ At.t NOT FOR(.`ONSTRUCTX7N�e__�� T � W tl„ TR`�E[ NE - ' �=4�- +i=1f+-1-Ffd-ETi +F� -_ -_i Hi-l- +-I id-H1-1-+i-1=I•+ -Fri+Fi °1 ° �1. 111 I I 1 I a :::::::: / � 1 3 o4 wQ5¢ Q Q! 8 G 10 Q Q1 1J 14 19 BQ] 1QB 1Y 0 11 2 4J I �- Il . T i I 4T T ? ? ? ? ? I ?b� T_T _ •.......• r.u...I...r... i i 1 i i r i i , i i i i 11 III I I�I 11 air,_! 1 I'11 o- � °I I I t, ° _�-k j--o 1110H" - 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I J--L — --L_1 L— ——--L LH_L — - _--L i- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 11 1 1= I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I II ! C c 11 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I I I I I I I 1 Z °1T 1 0 1 �= `a 4 i i i i i I III °!° I I I a °1 o ff_ - - -� -° - - -L� � - , — —0 •;Q1 IIII11. I11FI I ' ii >< I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I- I U, m — um- f, 'b ;a I I I I I I I I - - h�nee"es I �+ I cd T r H _.— �"T� f I TTT T� I TT T� naaea p_iG � .I• •R 1e I 1 Qa I I I 1 I i;II- : °1 1 o----°---f--1 1- --1— -1-° -=-4-1--k-i -.F-1 1_± '` ali I -O W ct o 11 -L-L-L-- -1. . _ ___-L-�-1-Li--. . ---L- ---L-I- _,0 00 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NOTESo 1 1 o-R rn- 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 '" ' `' I / a TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 668.500 G S F 0 4 ,e,xew1•uv/OL I 11 I I I I 1 1 1 1 11 I IOn5100 SrtF APPROVAI FIRST FLOORIE O AND PROPOSEDI 3114.060 GSF. o 1 arw I rp-1° I —9°�t 1 I 1 1 I I I _ I SECOND FLOORIPROPOSEDI 13.050 G5F TOTAL PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 413.010 GSF 1 I o---- Y T —1 T r r r T PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE 50X TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA 64.160 GS.F. I I I TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 604.331 G.S F. R�1 °9Pp 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1,1/IIII 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 210.567 G5F. bb ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED I I 1 I _ PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 36'-6' BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE •IQ ���-_1-/ I ^ ARTERIAL STREETS 20' Do-_—_—_—--.1 .--_�_—_1— _-_—_1—_.-.--_—_ —_j_4_—]—_..�._�_—_—_+_�_—_1--+_ - - I - J W9 OTHER STREETS 15' •j° ! e PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS 42'FRONT JP� x115'REAR SIDE =, 00' 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 !.. JDBCS 1 o-- ---_ _J L__J---L -L--L_.1—I--° —L L—1—L-L—--L-L--L L • - a-0 PROPOSED PARKING ANALYSIS I 1 I I I I I I I ? •; REFER TO PARKING STUDY BY THE TRANSPO GROUP j •-p-I L 1- -1 - _ -_ L- _ _1 _ 1_ 1 l. -- - --STANDARD STALLS-201 - --- I-- - ---- - --- - - - - - COMPACT STALLS I16X1 36 p ' VP 1..' I ACCESSIBLE STALLS 6 '• an I TOTAL STALLS 245 i ) - 1 II LEGEND -/—q`1�- �' I IIIpII I . . . . . . I AREA OF NEW PARKING STALLS _ I I 11 � I u o 1 1 L ,I 'l �c P PROPOSED SIZE LAN Wg AREA OF NEW LANDSCAPING 1 AREA OF NEW INTERIOR WORK ' EBE EXISTING BUILDING I � 0� t�1 i' — I. isrI•MiU i' `I 11 r, `g 1 IIIII o�e� ��.NO PARKING AREA I I ' 7•J I I -Ti9Rf0i0IY TI100M CT -- '_ 0I� 1 I'.. `' °PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 6 SITE PLAN 4 s v a lit Mom. n �'��� �T���'"�S 1 R O O C1 0 0 0 O- O 0 0,-"_>`�a;,2_s m m ® m m m m>°D m ® m I I o a� 1.r.„. „ ,� K JKJ A1.2 ----------- --- -------------------.0/6- ig4---------------------- SW 43rd STREET 04, 4, T TT T I ,R ,> ,O ,l, ,D ,D ,Y 7 ° M 1 i i i i i i i i i i i i 1 ! i :....y.:.::.: 1 I ! I I I I I 1 I 1 I I i 1 i i 1 111 i 11i i 1 i i i i i 1 i i i i 1 i i i i i i , i i i i i i i I 4., i I I I I 1 0. 1 i 11! i i i i i i i11 1 I 1 1 L I 1 I - 1_ I l I 1 L _= 1 1 ' -_-0 0--- i wow: . r 'TIM ''. :Nu . _ji__ - c1 co, �_-_-_-_-_ —_ SALES ,A000UNTI G _—_—_—_—_� la FT_ __ _ ��OPEN OFFICE��_— j'` _ `,- PEN-ABFIGEpAr"1Q _; _ _ — e / - —— 1 \ I I M , J v�— anarandilk.-7.--,4YL_ A1_ I =— ' Nan OPEN1OFFI oa F---------- IX PP4 ---- - �x< O .21 moo R. 66 45 B 6vtea O O44 m V cA C ro I FIRST LEVEL PLAN N .-0 h�'�1 �y W cd� O O CA i i i i i 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 i I i i Q I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'D„�„• >��`•�����•` I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I __ _ I I I Tr I I I � I I I I I I I I 7 _ I I I I I 1 1 1 I I „„ 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 i I I i 1 i o--1 - 1 I I 1 ) '--�-- 1 I I I 1 �D L JD r. _ I I �-_�_ ,,_i_____.________QcE ——I I 1 _ 1 1 �D/OD,JD - JD o-- I u ;It 1 I I A 1 I b Wu: . - 1 I 1 ! i 11 l.; '1 1 L -0 Q-------1 '.`�= a. - .aa. �-} -f----r--�Y- ='�W. =TV z �`=1 1�----r�--�--}--�--t-j----- '{}'�; I-------� ----tiI o --�—_-- �=` a vr— = r — --r —dUSTOMERSERVICE e -- _�_ OPEN OFFIG I 1 1 Y —�, ;. sr— MI� DESIGN dEPARTMENT J_ y_� ��•____ � �Y�F-� 9 I I I ObEN'bFFICE r— = — : ---#=-- _--- _ �fi fi rt=fi-rtrt _---_- �_-1_ rn k mum. FIRST L� ~ I �*�-_-_—�_- _�_�-_+�_-_-_-_-_-_� FIRST LEVEL& SECOND LEVEL PLANS �-0 ,orima m e __ ()SECOND LEVEL PLAN _._ A2.0 NOT FOR CONSfA0CT10N�...��_ • M o ° V.....j0 0 111:1LL MIT HUN •••'•••••• 0 ° 4 I I I I I _ — d i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i � .� � i i i i i i i i i i i i I 0 � 1 I i 1 i ' 8 i i i 1 i i , i i �i o--- ° 6 -i1 d i Qi G I- [ .�1 I I ° 1 I I i 1 i° - i------ 1 I I I ° —_Fp-0 F—+ 8 `}I 8 o 4 ±KE � A li U U CC � �� - - ---------- -P— $ -- � -- them'"=� --1 w 'G -- -- -=-- _- - ----- Cd O OROOF PLAN w.-0 r^ O a 1O/15/0o SR[APPROVAL W5 JR R DS— JD .---- PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 00005 10/]5/GD A2.1 NOT FOR COtiSfAUCTpN�e---- • u ® z, m Los,,„,, MIT RUN.n..,....... 1 I o- — — — -0 orrice MIMELJ 1111: ICI- l:T . �� g .� n�!m �� is1111:11, nnm L _ _ Row Row o 09 huHi � L�.M.� �int 4,4 „,„„, . . -- F- -rti 0 �imi ,LI j Uc ,...,,,„7 l'i Li i.h - I. — I— — b • U.-W (n XIII ( : �� OFFICE di i 1 ro o..�a IM - IHIIHI III 14 -71-1 I II I Pi-- ---I Pi "4 Locax ( I _ �+ . Row e= -. I -- _ _ �- a .-- - w _ o r Parril �, C ,' DL,., „. Q c Jo, c u 10/25101 SITe APPROVAL -0 °ENLARGED PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN . @ENLARGED PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN VR d ws Js .mms JB PROPOSED PARTIAL ENLARGED •FlRST LEVEL PLANS NON ,onsnu A2.2 NOT FOR ccPGETRUCT10N�o..__. M RO ? O a ? ? a ? a 3 LITHUN 1 1 1 r==---, 1 rz-.. ...—\ i r-1-1 , snoes „ �"-y . *vT II IIr � ... I lii , i.t Y , _ � :S s1 ,- r ,, ,1 D `, 1 `I ' ti. I I „-..- ,. - . , . ,,..; [ fi,,,,,IV,,t:,.,,r •.1?..;,,,,Ik, , 4,4, :.,0, Si:Ct, , ...c:. :,.+:i i,,,, ±S,.ti,,,,,?vl�'.K.Tlti:x,144 ,^. .i �1.' `x?q .r� :x, , , IjLI� ; ` I �IrI L. II I II I II I L I I A!,R IL I I I (MX BUMS TO DE nuOVEDI MA.EN LW MR BURRS TO es KEW. POCZ SUPERS TO BE 0.07•201 MFRS TO Et MM. °NORTH ELEVATION ....a . U T Q � ? Q Q Q . T .. . I iI 7 j i _"'"'"'"1 GLAZING 1 1 I j I I ~°°I"°..LL • 1 „ ,�j, i _°^�^., j 1 I j „ „Rj <1p • • I I I , wawa, ' f1 4-1 oAl_ - _ : ; , I in to:, ,� ii i%i IRAI.AR67 Ad[Iws� XOARLIMMM G 11 '� UUp , - �u, . - aa`ae q w»emasw,xxrrma a�ar+e�weriy >r .,-1-',- .:\ ... � - :: ...,......I:r:::.................A. a 1_i 11.®?' i ®�- I�I I.■■■■..■.■...rMYNN�M............ ..... V 1-- i I Ifr �R _ R n�.e.x ,env SOUTH ELEVATION C.) •"' b 2 RI , cu �. Iiiiiii.q. C� o GEaeT.<,11.21MH. ,- ,a.._Ii% I „� ., ,exn. I a OELEV.I EAST&WEST ENTRANCE 1R (°'ELEVATION I SOUTH ENTRANCE -(`�' iO... SITE gvPRO`/µ 7 7 7 7 4 I Q I I EMT PIELRGUSS 213 2 09 EAST ELEVATION ---- - -- -— - -- - - — - --- - --- - T 7 I 7 I 1 1 R< ,FIBERGLASS 1 I PROPOSED rW a.re,FIBERGLASS 1 /r,nco-lm,, „a o,� ooR 426 ooa, ""`0'""' BUILDING ELEVAl10NS II I114 f. L 1 I I — I L ,zMETAL CAM, —� canesII I 11 • _ r e.000es LL— a fdMG11"" r.oc.ea,nry. 11- SWEST ELEVATION Lcacw,lu,d �°P61•b0fi0°6°00, I I I I I A5.0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.-,..-.-. M HITRUN aIanw wu¢riwae t novae aNre awmu mamw wARINCU![ i reams mom ANTON 141 4 4 4 9 Q I 4 ? Q 99 j i j i '- ®®-1 j i i i i--- j i i I I I ft PI i I i : ` XL, ° j I I I —` # I j n �_—sa*..a_�t•�0 ScEn« CEVAG o `r I WL� u — N I 9 8— ver U 0.Gx;:w % �� --_—_ .ti . • >0 a_ta • • � u OBUILDING SECTION O BUILDING SECTION C.).- In Cd clj W g O 10/25/00 On APPROVAL C ' 1 - ws .1. I • _ ftt _ __ __ —_ — __I_: _ .I_ _ C— IM 0BUILDING SECTION m PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS MSS ioneroa ea A6.0 NOT FOR CC SMUCTI N.7.-7—__- Y�t-(1 -{"'0:'$'F'Q"F�'.$$'1$'1`F?+'• ' Se COMMENTS 7i DEt • tiC..t-T.-f-yT.T-�.4:�. _. 4-T_•F �..T.a _�-.�-s-f -a,C f �'.T fiS'lC St .LT1{I�-�'�--!`'i-�`�-�l _y-=l�l=-_�..��.j;_-i-`�,. ':T�ram;w=�•t-a 125360-0060-06 POWELL-ORILLIA L 'L C .769999 737 MARKET ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 125360-0062-04 POWELL-ORILLTA L 'L C 869800 737 MARKET ST KIRKLAND WA 98033 125380-0170-09 VALt:EY:= INDUSTRIAL: BUILDING 301603 C°EIl R -J..HALL ISSEY. CO INC AGT- 12835 BEL-RED RD STE 140 • 'BELLEVUE . WA . 98005 . 125381-0020=00 i BEDFORD :PROPERTY INVESTORS 709999 270 .LAFAYETTE '+CIR - LAFAYETTE :CA 94549 125381-0040-06 • PUGET -.SOUND: BLOOD CENTER 6 759999 'I- • 921 .TERRY ..AVE SEATTLE WA - 98104 125381-0042-04- PUBLIC,STORAGE <INC 850338 DEPT. PT-WA-97406s PO BOX:25025 .GLENDALE -.CA 91201 12538:1-0050-03 JWC'=C K- LLC 900438 3901 RAYM©ND=AVE•. SW RENTON .WA 98055 125381-0060-01 - OGIMA L .L C 703037: • C/O T.RIML-ITE _ INC • 901 5W-39TH ST_ RENTON 'WA 98055 125381-0240-04 CITY OF RENTON 940802 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON .WA 98055 1Z,3t31-UJU,-'Jo BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX- DEPT : .1700 E ° GOLF RD' x400 SCHAUBURG IL. 60173 • 125381-0390-02 BURLINGT©N .NORTHERN RR 741447 PROPERTY =-TAX, DEPARTMENT . . •777 MAIN ST.: 2680 FORT,%4ORTH T X 76102- 252304-9054r06 • DRAINAGE DI ST -1 062152 . ' • C/O JOHN: NELSON 601 • WEST COVE . KENT WA 98033 312305-9013-07 VIKING- FREIGHT =INC 229999 411 EAST PLUMERIA . SAM.JOSE CA 95134 312305-9097-06 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO 873269 PET TAX :.DEFT PO..80X_ 512485 LOS ANGELES CA . 90051 .312305;9121-06 • - KNUDSON INVESTMENTS LLC 559999 25707, SE -192ND: ST.. ' - MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 312305=91291.08 °GENUINE PARTS CO. 549999 i 2999 CIRCLE .75 -PARKWAY -ATLANTA - GA 30339 ' : • - 312305-9151-09 - CITY OF KENT 660762 CUSTOMER SERVICES 220 4TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 362304-9005-03 TALLY PRINTER CORPORATION 982108 PO BOX 97018 KENT WA 98064 ; • 362304-9033-09 - ZELMAN RENTON. LLC 840806 ' 707:WILSHIRE BLVD 03036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 ; • 362304-9086-05 - BARBER . ASSOCIATES 271736 • 7979 S' 180TH ST KENT .WA 98032 362304-9096-03 CASCADE FEDERAL:CREOIT 'UN 542484 ' PO 80X- 58450 • SEATTLE . WA 98138 ' 362304-9100-07 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800581 601:UNION :ST 45300 SEATTLE WA 98101 - 362304-9101-06 PARK 8000 LLC • 909999 • 18040 72ND AVE .S ' .KENT- WA 98032 • 362304-9104-03 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 839700 PO BOX . 297 KENT WA 98032 362304-9108-09 INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT C0M980998 1216 N TUSTIN ST • ORANGE CA 92867 362304-9109=08 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 899800 • 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 43036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 392680-0020-04 SYEN ,LLC • JYEN .LLC 915122 ' . REGENCY SAVINGS BANK ' 11 MADISON ST OAK PARK ,IL. 60302 392680-0070-03- KIRKE8Y:.TRUST PREIPERTIES 009999 : C/O .TAM . 730 ARIZONA AVE, 4421 SANTA MONICA-CA 90401' 5 :.::// ii !, N i RTI -- /'„..• .1,;(;.-/ 3 I. `g Z /„. 1 . l• •Ii n ' V . ' -• 411.;r71' ________.---- • :I I 9 39TH ST. •..s .at Sw. 39TH ST. , d ........--... -. . .....,... ': i 3.............. 1 d ' ' ••••.l'i IS= ... : 1 ,__ 11® I El ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL'P S . .,, i OF RENTON DIV.I A t" • . .w "s'r 't t. '' -'i , ,,, • sw. .. 41S1 .3L, s Di ' .. 4 .-,:.‹,1 1 .\Al 1 4,,,," i I' KpLL, au 51 ._, i r . t': 2 i t, ..—,..„.. E ,". N, . ``' i I , CENTER / F „„„• .7gC Xt.(tr j_ '4 u 1 _ 0 • 1 I ! • — I 1 • k‘,\ . _ i — l• _ N.str--1, ,..!..--:F"""------• ...I ......... ......„.i . •.:_.= / . 44--• ' S.w. •j -,/,11TI .AML N." 11—...\ I --- -----.•'-:' . ,.,-F . ,IZ-- ,•; rti €' j,-1- 114141 " galillagi MI: ' ...... '' DUCT D ' i S.VC•0*.lo ..••• ftig°'5'1Sr 0 , —I r y/ / "0 • L ,,,,, 01 ...-..-. 4 . -,.... •"...... c . %:: 'i '''. 4%,..., , /7 • ..:. •?./a um. ( 394TH R.) .e. . St rut ol;us 5- --, MI '. 7 -s--0 ;r:,. • ,4.4' .—— T r- la '1 > • , .. :g..171' ' 1 I — • cc , :. • L-.) • f:::,` P' . • . • D • k 110.CT g W' l'fl --'- ' 0 ..2 , ir . . ., • !. . • - .........,.., ° ...rr ..., 'ow d NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL PLAN :r F a RTI .� — ......:... io L.L.,el us. Mtli8 d\ \\\,I 1 ck NT'T xl/F I 4', -, .,TT11 lJ:a B � .,‘"' "1 1 . 1 .. n riff; ... 7—.�Ftl r t , � . E� • CITY 01 RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 21,2000 • Jay Pickering,AIA Mithun Arctiitects Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Suite 200 Seattle,WA 98101 Subject: SeaPack Center(LUA-99-156 I B000004) 1000 SW 43rd Street Dear Mr. Pickering: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the SeaPack Center site plan. The site plan was initially approved on December 2, 1999. The approved site plan included alterations to an existing warehouse structure, resulting in a 413,010 gross square foot warehouse and manufacturing facility with accessory offices. The proposed modifications include: • The relocation of 2,670 square feet of proposed accessory office area into two separate locations (one area at 845 square feet and another at 1,825 square feet) and the elimination of 1,105 square feet overall within the warehouse. • Revisions to the landscape planter located on the west-side of the building, including the relocation of a 12-foot walkway and stairs northward for approximately 46-feet. There would be no alterations to the amount of landscaping provided for the site. No alterations to the approved building footprint are proposed. The proposal does not significantly alter the amount of square footage dedicated to the specific uses previously approved and, therefore, does require the need for additional parking spaces or further analysis. The above listed revisions have been determined to be a minor modification of less than.10%to the approved site plan and is,therefore, approved. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. If you have any questions regarding this project or the information contained in this letter, please contact me at(425)430-7270. Sincerely,; Lesley Nishihir Project Manager cc: Jennifer Henning, Land Use Review Supervisor • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • i --- z r• € t Y • )4` { MITHUN _ `` : Pier 56,1201 Alaskan Way,Ste.200 Seattle,WA 98iot TEL 206 623.3344 Fax 206 623.7005 WWW.MITHUN.COM July 13,2000 Lesley Nishihira-Planner City Of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 cIlvii 'EhL�(?J Re: PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR REQUESTED REVISION @ 2% SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton,WA 98055 JUL1 7 2000 Renton Land Use No.:LUA-99-156 and Building Permit No.:B000004 I 1 MPI Job No.:99065.00 Dear Lesley: This letter accompanies the submittal for a Building Permit Revision of the warehouse's accessory offices at SeaPack Centre. Seattle Packaging Corp requested that the Shipping&Receiving Offices in the west portion of the warehouse be revised,split into two areas and separated to assist them with their shipping operations. We formally request a minor modification to the approved site plan for these changes. The following information will assist you with your review of this minor modification request. PROJECT NARRATIVE The interior tenant improvement revision to the Shipping&Receiving offices entails the relocation of two interior S&R Offices to the Southwest corner of the warehouse,maintaining the existing toilets and relocating the interior lunchroom and two S&R offices slightly northward from their present location. Along with the relocation of the interior offices and lunchroom,the associated exterior windows and entrance doors to these offices have been relocated. The entry door relocation,requires the entry sidewalk(through the west landscape area)and the parking stalls,to be slightly relocated also. Please see the attached drawings which note the new locations. Revision Information for Accessory Offices: • Minor Use Revision:It is requested for approximately 3,775 SF of "approved" accessory office areas at the Production Offices West(@ Grids H/J&Grid 1)be split into two new accessory office areas of+/-845 SF(@ Grids A/B&Grid 1)and+/-1,825 SF(@ Grids J/K& Grid 1). } 1 Project Narrative/ Revision SeaPack Centre Page 2 7/13/00 The+/-1,825 SF is composed of+/-525 SF of existing toilets and +/ 1,300 SF new offices/lunchroom. This is a 1,105 SF reduction of accessory offices within the warehouse. There is no change in the square footage of the manufacturing use. (FYI:No"Legend"has been provided on the drawings.) • Parking Stalls:There is no requested change to the approved number of 245 parking stalls. The reduction of accessory offices does not increase the parking stall requirement. The stalls adjacent to the west landscaping need minor relocation to allow for access to the relocated sidewalk and entry door. • Landscaping Areas:On the west side of the building(at Grids H/J/K&Grid 1) the approved 12 foot wide sidewalk and stairs need relocation northward approximately 46'-0" within the approved landscape planter for the relocated entry doors. This'minor revision does not decrease or increase the SF of landscaping. Project name,size&location of site: _ SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton WA 98055 • Year Built: 1978 - • Zoning: IM- Industrial Medium • Type of Construction:V-N Sprinkled • Occupancy:Group S • Lot Size: Approx. 668,500 SF. • Existing Warehouse Size: Approx.371,070 GSF • Approved Total Warehouse&Manufacturing w/ Accessory Office Size: Approx.413,010 GSF-No Change • Approved Total Building Footprint Size: Approx.389,748 GSF-No Change • Approved Height:Approx.36'-6"-No Change • Approved Lot Coverage:Approx.604,337 SF-No Change • Approved Parking: 245 stalls-No Change CLOSING Time is of the essence for your review of this minor revision request to prevent delays in the construction. If you have any questions that come up during your review, please contact me Q 206-623-3344. Thank you for your support and help! 1 Sincerely, •, Jay Pickering,AIA Project Manager cc: L.Whitaker-Perkins Coie J.Alkire-Seattle Packaging Corp. B.Alexander-Edifice Construction J. Schramm-Transpo t STREET s a • ------ -7-.:_"7--- o .1312 / :' : R.500' 1,- _ - _ _ _ , 4 ` I 1I1 I I I AITRUN L•BSBD•/ x • ..: , 2 3 5 6 7 B B O 12 3 5 6 7 B p O 21 22 23 i ion QQQ, . °0T4 TTT70og7777777T'1��°4'r � r— ,; j i 1 1 IT i i 1 1 i I�•i l I 1 !Li I IIIII t�1 ��-� �i-- 1-- — �—! j ;a ;R.e , s— ; I I Ta II'lL MA.,°=i-/ i i t ".. ,nxD�°.DR,�. ° - - ! 1 � I . I I ----;!...t,`°I` j SEA PACK 14 I i 1 1 I I 1 1 I , I j CENTRE �,- - -- —� T - -,- - 1 - -�-I- T - - SIT `� I 1 Seattle Packaging I ! I I I I I I ' Corporation LEGEND • I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1000 SW 43rd Street :-, 1_. . . I J.--�._-L---I—.—.—_ — .- I I I / Renton WA980_' -, I I E%TENT OF NEW _ T T"� —1— , - - T H--I— I- — �,fl — LANDSCAPE AREAIPERVIOUSI / i' I R A I I ��� III I AREA OF NEW INTERIOR WORK `v.,. aye - IIfflffl �1 OEXISTING BUILDING ! ' D II 4 — ':`:%' 1 1 'I°'S0 I II I I I — - c ! 1 11 11 �� NO PARKING AREA a ni ! I {t, Iq e I 1 I w I III NORrrI c c ��.— I- --- -r -, �:f4<��_�I� ��_�'� - —� ; I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 : R"'� I ; f '. i i . i i I I I I 1 I I I I' , i i I III 11 1 -- I _ I I I I__ f I __I _ _ I I' - 1-'-• KEY PLAN PRQPED SITE PLAN NOTES n TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 653250 GSF A z I lu new I°°M0I I I I I I I I II ! I I I I I WIMP SITE APPROVAL FIRST FLOORIEXISTING AND PROPOSED]304,060 GSP .1 I g'e 1xi0 t000ro a on'I SECOND FLOORIPROPOSEDI IB950 G 5 F j �c`s` to _ — I I I I I I I I - 12l)/08 OD SET TOTAL PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 413.010 GSF -E>_ -_.____-- • "I -I i-I-�- �e� URO/72 PERMIT sfT PERCENTAGE OF LOT PEDCOVERAGEAREA SO4 I I I I I �< I I I I I I I (- TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA 64,16p GSF I I )O)/00 CT$ri TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 1D1.321 GSF TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 210.567 GSF ( 1 {:y ` D I I I j 4 Ir\I I I n 4/18/00 ADDPNDUM 11 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED 0'-_- 1 -`.i iS S I I }� \ n �3/1 1 .• I-: A',moo PERMII PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 36-6' iQ 1 %�"' `: BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE U '%•� I ARTERIAL STREETS 20 p --.} _. - ---_-- �_:i%.: I -�i�-Ii I- D WS OTHER STREETS 15' �__ .�i- � �._.1—.t.� - I" I `::� I _�.- —1--T-�"--I-"T-�"—_I—.T.— -� 1ISFS SIDE ,.xD,r.w c �! I I I /f1VV rm°50 I I I I I I rm .......... PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS I I i=! "M14° .,,. JP D6_ GO'REAR ure u¢nsnx°caxomow I eR TO s IAii I I 1 1 uepux I I 1 il I !suers DS,CS PROPOSED PARKING ANALYSIS/LEGEND I .e.^w Mc JI _ I --- I!.[w I _ ■ 'P STANDARD STALLS 1D1-IND NOTE �/ `� --`J— ——.1 — �.1_— ` t I • —1—_1-.—(__— —_L J —1—._L _ _-0 .- COMPACT STALLS 120XI 47- ICI I I % I I I ACCESSIBLE STALLS 7- 1,011 VAN) \1 I.I ' TOTAL STALLS 245 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . M ° ADIVTIO N AI 1 6 ,x,e ot± Ht *rIi! it w. RtDI _ ; pAwu >>< s —1 ��:r J Ili u%:>W... a:� ��...... :':;':" SITE PLAN I , 4 _ I r' I a Ar::w v:i:•?i:ti� :?5.`. % ....... r° L ' a _c i °1 ��e,/ _001\ 00 ob H I 010,.� o 1 rdoo 1 10O_.._'\t�r�1Q I 1 1 1 DDDes T �—_�— N !, �1�e1`�'I I I I �i y ,plj a: • 3D5/00 • OPROPOSED SITE PLAN Vm..o ` O © O 0 © O O O O Lm�\'�� i c 16 n <1_8J 6 0 20 §vt 22 r Y3 , \}- 4,411174 2 ,. -- - t5vTa5sorwrnrN¢>r-- --- _- ^P' A 1.3 cD SET SW 43rC•STREET SM806'S1'E 670 90' ^^���. CITY O_ RENTON ohi .. . ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 21, 2000 . Jay Pickering,AIA . Mithun Architects Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Suite 200 Seattle,WA 98101 Subject: SeaPack Center(LUA-99-156/B000004) 1000 SW 43rd Street Dear Mr. Pickering: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the SeaPack Center site plan. The site plan was initially approved on December 2, 1999. The approved site plan included alterations to an existing warehouse structure, resulting in a 413,010 gross square foot warehouse and manufacturing facility with accessory offices. The proposed modifications include: • The relocation of 2,670 square feet of proposed accessory office area into two separate locations (one area at 845 square feet and another at 1,825 square feet) and the elimination of 1,105 square feet overall within the warehouse. • Revisions to the landscape planter located on the west-side of the building, including the relocation of a 12-foot walkway and stairs northward for approximately 46-feet. There would be no alterations to the amount of landscaping provided for the site. No alterations to the approved building footprint are proposed. The proposal does not significantly alter the amount of square footage dedicated to the specific uses previously approved and, therefore, does require the need for additional parking spaces or further analysis. The above listed revisions have been determined to be a minor modification of less than 10%to the approved site plan and is, therefore, approved. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. If you have any questions regarding this project or the information contained in this letter, please contact me at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihir Project Manager cc: Jennifer Henning, Land Use Review Supervisor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • lr AIL IA ,,IN DOCIL IN "me r cox<LANDS 10 MITHVN ®� A rse,sui .,...,.., o 6 HD - Fly- -— _ =' •-- RERea TO STRICT -0 n. .a,.° • - — �.. la ® s ---- 1- C]- .k.. a TMEM NOTED O STRUCTURAL°...,.wig.� ES' _ "- 1 ,, SEA PACK p..w rq ..�y ° ,11 J" e yY CENTRE _ I Lx_rr.AnS�.m ® .�Y c b; Seattle Packaging ? Q 'I n xT Corporation _- - ® _I_ i® 4 4 t *eta' u - iacius. 1000 SW 43rd Street __- 1L_ .— . ^���\ :ti _I14. n___ "�� RTMA WA 961'i - n A TTO T.a"iu� E - co_ a...ro.e e -- -- ----- 4 ^ i ,yN. II�® • p / . 4 Re E NORTH i,..E1 r ®IIll• I I(I lal I I I.I— I I_II ILG<�. °•,•••,2 - REMOTE EXISTINO MC.1.I. .P.1...[u...P...�x..—.-:! a IE F I' _ ,� � h4 I I I I I ® ®4 I I n I I I ,4 I r ,, .ss....e.n ._,_. ,L., I — \C . ... G' . .: d_) °'' -- 2 r,. .��. • .y RE r � KEY PLAN °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN -PRODUCTION AREA WEST CENTRAL 1 �Vr - I T©Di! I Scale:N.T.S. 1 I C O C 3 I - --- - - (1) 10nsn0 SITE APPROVAL .eiy I ra.exow I tlnna PD MET - ',5 0 - --�-- - - -0G 12n0/P9 PERMIT SET 5N5/00 CD OFT A 4/28/00 ADDENDUM A 2 PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN -PRODUCTION AREA EAST 9 Ve•.-0 PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN-RAIL SPUR INFILL °.•.d ". EASTPRODUCTION AREA LEGEND DSO EXISTING DOORS ea uaE SP E. _ REMOVEDEXISTS WALL TO REMAIN N301 MM.WALL TO BE JD/DS .. N309 OffICE - - a /' 7.5 9 PT PI - NSW . JP saran NIS WENS PCOM tat PETAL ri..to WALL ;e - 11307 ..�R .tteWM 1,11 n.nWXr.rvun.r. ©-♦D , .e1. .u+[wus[°aw eb..-. w WO w /Re > - or rr r.PIN.DOSS usxn A.SELF-CLOSING .S1s .rr eei Neu mea . , Z MIS1nr1 'IN • • Rt o ® I - - _ PT PT XICK 1.4 PARTIAL 113•00 OPEN OM. ENLARGED § a I altna OPEN OFF .>.1 .[rya `F ,_..._. .. .P ,.. ,.. ° ., ., - .3.1 FIRST LEVEL PLANS 9 i ROM vervroTA'TIVorrICZro ,r.I if n eM.DyDss °PARTIAL FIRST LEVEL PLAN-PRODUCTION AREA SOUTHWEST • A2_2 CD SET " -re n .. n n n n n n. " A A n /- • . ...•- . . • . • M MIT HUN ..........., (3) (3) (?-7-2:,),R 35. 63; a ,T7-E, ) €F.Z.,'; . eq. .271);;-.2, €: ,e, „0, v i ‘7" 7- .--' t 1- t ,.........,... , , : , "...:gm: . . ,...„,..r, , ; I ,,,•,, , ,• , . . , , i _iggLyaz ..- : ,• , -„,..______, . • • ,,,, . • -i•L__• -- L J L .._ _lii; YFS:1W;:ron.RS Let711140.2107•301152.0',CO.CK.,RS FB.I'OrD'r„i /, • 1 '•e; '''' •.' IllirRELOCA3033 ON STOD 10.0,10,ov2/11FIRAD 00345 . . / I ' 171 1 F:61E17 I / I EOM.DOM DOORS LEDISIINS DOCK 00023 eRISTIMO DOCK DOORS TO Be DM FOR I.ASPHALT MO TO TO BE USED FOR VEMATIOR COY REMAIN IN USD VtIOILATION OtA, -••'.. ''. .7.'f•-..!'l °NORTH ELEVATION SEA PACK CENTRE :7 ..i-i•. ;; /T., _ 5 2• '6-., /7-,.. --, •,,,g,etc') '72,, ,, 6'31/,;-, Rh (,2 81 e‘i-3-6),(IT;\,, 6- c6.,) €il- (?, 9 Seattle Packaging 1 7 ; . . I Aso I ci-r'UV NACKLECTURAO / s'/- ARO/RFNEENI BM. 1„,,„,.„,. 1 STUCCO-1M 5. .rOTO=121."------i-.0 .-"-i ,_ 1 ROOF RAM,. I I 0 0 I 0, ,„..._0 I 0o Et„ I I 0 , t`""T"'') Trole'Zoi I I I I I .I If....roe t I rp,,A,N Corporation 0 • rY:k., - 7,.... .z.... Iwo SW 43rd Street SM.!. • • / r> / / j I LI-I • ON •• i I I I r • • • •' j-17„,,„ 1. 1, iii a, if j , I 11 I I .I I .6. • ! •. , .. .. .. ... I \ E i c Renton WA 9Sir 'c _ i LI\__1._,: 1 ! .'. :1 II Illil ' il IT1 , 'MEM MEM , ._ , _ MOH; II I IIII1 I Il *i II 'II Il i _ - 3ND FLR s 1.--1=11 1 i.==..........1.•_._,:-I,L--..:i:-....:.•-1-L:,.-1:-:-:2-::'.7.---=1'2.2-..1.---.=---:-=.1.:.:.:-......tr------71r_iI:17_1-I :ra_Lfiz:- .._,_ .-..,.._77.-4::..2......-.-.:.:.-.-i-_-.=-.._y•.,:-.:_, ......:.-..-. _ =:-.,==_7_.'..._.41 __.:-,,,,,,,,...,,,, •-''''.'''Z 6' ;I 1 II 1 /-11 I I I 1 IIII I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I.1) 1 I I.1). IN M 7 91 F IIII. I -.--.-,.....-.11 ins soon! 1 1 1 1,1), 1 1 I 1.(_1) 1 1 1,1) I 1 1, , _. ____• ____ -22,°T..:etio z, irli=„ ADA Alg,ttAwfus, [WU PLANTER WALL 12/CAP . <\2. . • <\3. Cil) °I/I la)j 1 G -"'t- 9, 0'. 2 2 0 6 COD PLANTER- :erEL'erTTAB'L"' 0 SOUTH ELEVATION . . "'''.'citol: =Ono WALL VW CAP NORTH . Art • <I I> • i ' (---. TO PAWEL snoca-tre I ' •1 0 • i ucTu meow,- ....,•••••• , rm WHIIIIIMIIMIll AM ----- 1 Rini h' r Aels 1 •••••=-"---,.— 1 • / . NINON l_sww_ riew_m_a Scale:N.T.S. 0 ELEV.0 EAST&WEST ENTRANCE °ELEVATION 0 SOUTH ENTRANCE - .. - I0/25/912 SITE APPROVAL .• •• 12/3/DO OD SET 12/20/02 PERMIT SET • . • . 5/15/00 CD SET AA.4,/,27°000::: 011/1 II (4 7,, ,';-,, ,';-: • 0 0 T T REPLACE Mr CAP n.a.6.40•STUCCO --SMAL A GLASS •- L--.• • , S-H-•• \--/ri'S • @ H • ,,,.,.....,..,,,, c.,,,,,... • , LAMM Rem TO "'.:'.1 - ' '''''' 1 C) (Y rgir MT OM SLR.35/AS• : . MIT47,7 Oa AGYOVLO i .STMOTTPD 2 i • ARCH SCAM I r 1 ws in •,- ! ! -1-.!--1 . ELMO P•Awa•Hs VP . i i . I. . - I Neve oreloci....STORMONT 2.1:—. I'1 !i i , i i -i . • -.1iii_Alt , r''''''..MUST WALL OS ...,..., Glenna eletif P • , ,........., i SIVECOMPD 3, , DS . ., , • '_.......--1 snrcco-rne Fel ---F---!- I a_ 1 I HT 1 !III 1111111111111111111 uli_ fa L. .... 1 i 1 I i 1 1 I : i sn.cco•rm 1--t- 0 . F7.7...Trs,,...Aiszw. 0 0 ,..g./2im el=. 0 EAST ELEVATION 1 .. aro HOISIttED /- • p p p p ' P' T., 11D p Wri,1.1.WV! Sile.20.TTPE 1 , =Trngr, -141441.&DLASS CANOPY.REFER TO Mr.41%.11=. Ber0133-..\.. .9..,C.,, .1' ear_t_ilt 0 7),_ TU/4.3.1.47.1,... SEED MASA 1 1 • r --\ 1 .... , : IL , , , , bp—r .....---.. BUILDING ELEVABONS j, SIIICCOTTPD 3 . [ I onocAno ooci:owe.-\,, I renew-co oocc onno-t 1 I 1 .[mow:oocc 000rsi , 1J , h , , 1 1 , ,ffik_L i "44 STUCC0.119e 3 I i IP." 0085 . 1 . ert...3-1152•11.27,7E.- . 1) L— ,,...••-.i/--, .,,•,-1••••• ,,,,..;•,1),,,,•:, :.-,,51,1./ •,/,..„1.,/,,, .,:z1.:,„„,,,,,,, 4•4/Y ••,&t,. -,/ -iv ,•-••,-ow, /017,7, ,-; - -7---- ....._... MGYI CONC . -,..1= 0 LIGHT FIRM PER ELEC.LIP ''CIERSI 520.11\MIST OPCNIXO TO'PE 04.0.1. II •MOM St We.PRAWHO I.STUCCO-1MR . ROTA1.0 MALL ,.-.- C9)WEST ELEVATION AL.0______L___."'T ...,-. CITY JF RENTON ..t✓L " -Y, Planning/Building/Public Works Department `Jesse Tanner,Mayor . . Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 12,;2000 Jay Pickering,AIA Mithun Partners 1201 Alaskan Way, Suite 200 Seattle,IWA 98101 Subject: Proposed Revisions to Approved Site Plan for Seattle Packaging Center(File No. LUA=99-156) Dear Mr. Pickering: The revisions to Building Permit#B000004 submitted July 11,2000 to this department must be addressed in the land use application file for the project. The City's Site Plan regulations allow for the modification (minor and major)of an approved site plan. However, a process is required in order to appropriately document the request and subsequent approval, if issued, of such a modification. It is likely the proposed revisions would be considered less'than a 10% change to the approved site plan. Therefore, the proposed changes would qualify as a minor modification. Minor modifications require Administrative approval and are subject to a two-week appeal period. In addition, all parties of record are notified of the approved modification. In order to initiate the minor modification process,the following items will be required for inclusion in the official land use file: . 1. A narrative explaining the requested revisions, and which formally requests approval of a minor modification to the approved site plan. 12. One full size copy of the revised site plan, as well as any other plans which have been modified as a result of the proposed changes (e.g.,floor plans, building elevations, etc.). 3. . An 8W x 11" Photo Mylar Transfer(PMT)reduction of all plan sheets submitted. 4. A legend/parking analysis indicating the revised breakdown of building area dedicated to specific uses, such as office,warehouse and manufacturing. In addition, the revised amount of required parking must be indicated in the legend on the new site plan. . Once the above listed items have been submitted, a letter stating the approval (with conditions, if any)ori denial of the proposed modification will be issued by the Zoning Administrator. This: decision will be followed by a two-week appeal period,which must be completed before the' issuance of building permits. If you have any questions regarding this project or the requirements discussed in this letter, please!contact me at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley;Nishihira 0 Project Manager -cc: Jennifer Henning, Principle Planner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 Thic nnnor rnntainc Am-rarvrlori matorial 9r%nnct rnnc,,mar 02/16/00 17:16 FAX c uuziuuz PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE,SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHING ION 98101-3099 TELEPHONE;206 583.8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 LAL>t.A N.W11rrAiXSR 206-583-8584 w rL c@2ERx SC01E. February 16, 2000 Via Facsimile Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re Appeal of Administrative Decision to Deny Parking Modification Request, File No. LUA-99156, SA-A, CCF Dear Mr. Kaufman: Please be aware that the City of Renton and Seattle Packaging have successfully negotiated a Parking Covenant to ensure adequate on-site parking for • Seattle Packaging's new Renton facility. On that basis, the City has approved a revised parking modification for the project and we withdraw our appeal (filed December 17, 1999.) of the City's original parking modification decision. Thank you for your help and please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, n I (A24/i [JA/1/CIA, Laura N. Whitaker Attorney for Seattle Packaging LNW:fdj cc: Larry Warren, Esq. Ms. Lesley Nishihira Jack Alkire, Esq. (Via fax) • 123487-0002/SL003684.001 J ANCHORAGE LIELLCVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KO)NC: LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA 01/27/00 15:34 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS COIE _•- 002/002 • • PERKINS COTE LLP 1201'THIRD AVENUE,SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINCTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 I.AURAN.WHITAF 206-583-8584 wHJTL@FERIMISCO15. January 27, 2000 Via Facsimile &Regular Mail Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Continuance of February 1,2000 Appeal Hearing of Administrative Decision to Deny Parking Modification Request, File No. LUA-99156, SA-A, CCF Dear Mr. Kaufman: ,This letter is to confirm that the hearing in the above-referenced matter, which is currently set on February 1, 2000, is continued until a future date. All parties anticipate resolution of this matter in the near future without the necessity of a hearing. We do, however, wish to reserve our right to set a hearing at a later date should one be necessary. We will formally withdraw our appeal upon this matter's successful resolution, which we anticipate to be formalized by February 4, 2000. Thank you for your help and please contact me if you have any questions. . Sincerely, Laura N. Whitaker Attorney for Seattle Packaging LNW:fd cc: Larry Warren, Esq. Ms. Lesley Nishihira Jack Allcire, Esq. (Via fax) . t23487-0002/5L003677.6041 __ -_ _ - - _•.. - • ANCHOKACE BELLEVUE ROISE OENVER HONC KONC LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK PAR&OLYMPIA PORTLAND vaNco ANE CANADACO CEA�I'LE SPOKANF. iAIPEI WASI1INGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC : 7 ; ' P1 nnin /Building/Publio Works Department . • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmeithan- , , February 9 2000 • • : : - . •: „ • , , • • - - • - _ „- Laura Whitaker ' , • , " : • . • , • . _, • Perkins Coie LLP • _ 1201 Third Avenue, 48th Floor Seattle,WA 98101-3099 • Subject: Parking Covenant for Seattle Packaging - File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF S. . _ Dear Ms. Whitaker: Thank you for submitting the draft Parking Covenant for Seattle Packaging, which was required as a condition of approval for the revised parking modification request The draft covenant was routed for approval and comments have been received from the reviewing sections (attached). . • , The CitY's Attorney has reviewed and approved the document as to its legal form7 In addition, the Property Services section has determined the legal description for the --document does describe property currently under review by the City known as Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103). They have approved the • document based on the assumption that the subject covenant will be recorded after the - short plat is recorded and that the appropriate legal description and property owner will be reflected in the document A copy bf the recorded Parking Covenant will be required prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy under Building Permit No. B000004. Please submit the recorded document to my attention. , Your efforts (and patience) in this process have been greatly appreciated. If you have • any further questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425)430-7270. Sincerely, Ci1/11/ Lesley Nish' ra ProjectI Manager • attachments . „ - , • . . , cc: -_Jennifer Henning . • ' • ; . : •• • ,7S? • •-• ••, -••; ;-••• ; • ,.• ' k • -,,: , •,; • ::;".• • : : • • '.-::',• , , •t • 71:•••'''• "• : ' : .1* : ;• •- •-• I 1055 South Oracly Way,--'-.R6ilt6h Washington T . : •• • '' •• I •'•A ; '‘ L.: .6.,isi;apei 50%recycled material 26%Ooit consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 5, 2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J. Fesser��� SUBJECT: Seattle Packaging,Parking Covenant • Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced legal description and find that it does describe (using a metes and bounds description)property currently under review by the City of Renton known as Parcel A of the P.N.W. Group A Short Plat,LUA-99-103. This short plat has not been approved and recorded, as of this date. The property owner at the time of our last review (November 1999)was Pacific NW Group A. We assume that the subject covenant is to be recorded after the short plat is recorded and Seattle Packaging Corporation purchases said Parcel A of the short plat. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\U:\SFESSER\SEAPACK.DOC i r ::' �.1 SLALL: 1 '=2UU V `d .:::.:::i::::::,:::.:.:::,E..: :::::.:.:::.::.:::::::::::::::::„ 0 100 200 400 d - CENTERLINE MONUMENT NORTH FOUND EXISTING MONUMENT IN CASE ON MAY 19, 1999 (TYPICAL)__ - - -- - --- - -- --- - - --- - - -- - -- 20-F-T,--WIDE FRON r, SET-BACK (SEE N rn S. W. 41ST ST. 89'2811 S 88 36'51" E 2197.88' 55.00' - - y s- - - - - - - - - - 85.89' ,....... _... -- S g8' 8'S1 A E_.. __� - ` �n04�5r - - - *R I (r - --- ,._ 'J 664.69 a � �, 676.42' � 663.:��- i • -9 �^ I 200 T SETBACK LINE FROM R = C 1 ,i "ORm.N°RY HIGH WATER :AOM-- + I�-R -- PROPO, '► BOUNDARY LIN_ __ 1 ; SE. •ETAIL "A" L --: a 1 1 ; cia ui iri 45' i•I I ----- -_ 6711ss' PA A i 1 67' (�A AVM, L�l/ 67• PA /7 (-_, E I. w 14 oLa) ik ; � rzl I 116• i p PROPOSED BOUA � 1 ----t A = 90�3'53" .4' O R = 55.00' I L = 88.94' �► - - S 25% in 98. 670.90' 0 I. a o — -- 1 676.42 683.84' N 88'36'51" W 2212.37'S. W. 43RD ST. • � CITY F RENTON L Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor. Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Nishihira,Development Planning From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date:. February 1, 2000 Subject: Parking Covenant for Seattle Packaging 1000 S.W. 431.d Street I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence J. arren. LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington A8:171.13. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 -'(425)255-8678 Co This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer -,;� � .. RENTON CITY F R Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor December 30, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Ms. Laura Whitaker JAN 0 3 1999 Perkins Cbie LLP 1201 Third Avenue,48th Floor RECEIVED Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 --SUBJECT: REVISED PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK CENTRE,FILE NO.LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Whitaker: Thank you for submitting the revised parking modification request(copy attached)pertaining to the SeaPack Centre. Our evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has submitted a revised parking modification request (attached)from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. A previous modification request was denied on December 7, 1999 (al,so attached). As a result of that decision, the applicant (Seattle Packaging) is proposing new project components intended to address parking concerns. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental . protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 /CAr�:�..�..e......., ...an.i.er..rlaA matnrial 20%nnst consumer December 30, 1999 s - Page 2 • of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new-stalls on the north side of the building,resulting in a new total of 245 on-site --parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. The proposed 245 parking spaces for the site would result in 65 spaces less than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application and was subsequently denied. On December 27, 1999, the applicant submitted a revised parking modification request. In the revised request, the applicant is proposing to record a Parking Covenant to run with the land. The covenant specifies that 245 stalls will be provided on-site prior to the completion of the renovation project. At the City's request when it is determined to be necessary, an additional 30 stalls would be created in an area currently utilized for loading areas. The creation of the additional stalls would require the closure of loading doors, which the applicant has agreed to. The additional stalls would result in a total of 275 parking spaces parking spaces for the site—only 35 spaces fewer than the minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification is required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was submitted with the site plan application. According to the study, a total of 310 parking spaces would be required for the site. This includes 151 stalls for areas dedicated to manufacturing use(based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,000 square feet/150,971 square feet of manufacturing space proposed) and 159 stalls for areas dedicated to warehouse use Document2\cor / December 30, 1999 Page 3 (based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,500 square feet/237,936 square feet of warehouse space proposed). The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on- site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations(office). The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles,with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be -provided would be utilized. Furthermore, as indicated by the draft parking covenant included with the request, 30 additional stalls would be created in the event the City determines the additional stalls are necessary for SeaPack's use of the site. The requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound, engineering judgment. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. The proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity.. Furthermore, the proposed parking covenant Would allow the City to require the property owner to create,30 additional stalls in the event impacts to adjacent properties become evident. 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. The proposed parking covenant would ensure that additional spaces are provided when, land if, the City determines more spaces are needed for the use of the site by Seattle 'Packaging. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. ,As stated under criterion number 2, the proposed parking would not create .adverse impacts from the SeaPack Centre to other properties in the vicinity. In addition, cross access and transient truck parking easements are to be established as part of the short plat involving the subject site. These easements would ensure loading vehicles would not eliminate required parking stalls. In order to further reduce impacts to adjacent properties, the proposed parking Document2\cor December 30, 1999 - Page 4 covenant would allow the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls at any time the spaces are determined to be necessary. Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- site parking spaces. The parking covenant proposed to be recorded and run with the title for the property would allow for the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls when the City determines the stalls are necessary. The 275 total stalls proposed would be 35 spaces less than the minimum required by code. Based on the parking study provided by the applicant, it is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. The parking covenant would allow for the City to require the creation of additional stalls if determined to be•necessary for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. The revised parking modification request is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Parking Covenant shall be revised to include the following: • A provision which requires the submission of a detailed parking analysis to be reviewed and approved blithe City when application is made for any change in use, tenant improvement, building permit, or business license for a new occupant for the subject property; • Language which discloses that future uses/expansions on the property may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient; and 2. After the review and approval of the revised parking covenant by the City Attorney and the Property Services section, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded document to the project manager prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the renovated building. Sincerely, 3//4,/q.eie/111 Gregg Zifin ierman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Document2\cor 0,1/25/00 16:57 FAX 206 583 8500 r1:AK1SINJ . After recording, return to: Perkins Coie 1201 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Seattle,WA 98101 PARKING COVENANT Grantor: Seattle Packaging Corporation Grantee: City of Renton Abbreviated Legal Description: Parcel A of that Ptn. of NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North,Range 4 East,W.M. Tax Assessor's Parcel No.: This Parking Covenant is made on the day of- , 2000, by Seattle Packaging Corporation, a Washington corporation("Owner"). RECITALS : A. Owner is the owner of certain real property situated in King County, Washington and described on EXHIBIT A attached hereto (the"Property"). B. Owner has submitted to the City of Renton("City") a site plan("Site Plan") for the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supprng office numberLUA-99-156o SA-.A, ECF space In connectionon the Property. The Site Plan has project with the Site Plan, Owner has requested a modification from Section 4-4-080F10e of the City's parking regulations in order to provide 275 parking stalls, less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code, but more than sufficient for Owner's employee count at full employment. ,C. The City has agreed to approve the requested parking modification, provided that Owner executes and records upon substantial completion of the Project this Parking Covenant as a covenant running with the land. • PAGE 1 PARKING COVENANT r(25/00 2 I [234A7-0002/SB903 55 0.252] 01/25/00 16:58 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS CUth _— 'ei""',""4 AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner hereby agrees as follows: 1. The 275 parking stalls referenced in Recital B, above,will be provided as follows: (a) 245 stalls will be striped upon substantial completion of the Project. (b) An additional 30 stalls ("Additional Stalls")will be provided within 45 days of written request by the Administrator of the City's Planning/Building/Public Works Department,which request shall be at the Administrator's sole and complete discretion. (c) Owner acknowledges that provision of the Additional Stalls may require closure of one or more of the Project's dock doors. 2. Upon application for any change in use, tenant improvements, building permit, or business license for a new occupant(i.e. other than Seattle Packaging, Inc. or Adventure 2000, Inc.) for the subject property, a detailed parking analysis must be submitted for the City's review and approval. 3. Future changes of use for site development that expands present uses or employee counts beyond those projected in the parking study for SeaPack Centre prepared by The Transpo Group, dated October 18, 1999, may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient. 4. The covenants set forth herein constitute covenants running with the land, shall be binding upon the Property, and shall be binding upon Owner and its assigns. 5. The provisions of this Parking Covenant shall continue in full force and effect in perpetuity from the date hereof, unless terminated with the written consent of the City as set forth in an executed and acknowledged instrument recorded in the real property records of King County, Washington. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner has executed this Parking Covenant as of the date first written above. PAGE2 PARKING COVENANT 1/25/00 2 E 2 [23487-0002/SB993550.282] O1/25/00 16:58 FAX 206 680 SSUU YYx1111VJ WIZ • SEATTLE PACKAGING CORPORATION By Name: Title: PAGL•3 PARKING COVENANT 1lZ5/��PSG 1PM 3 [234R7-0002/SE993 5 50,2R2] 0 ./25i00 16:58 .]FAX 206 583 8500 - PERKINS COIELei V°°.VUI • STATE OF WAS'HINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Notary Public in On this�day of December, 1999,before me,the undersigned, a appeared and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and.sworn,t personally eknown to bet he person who signed as of SEATTLE PACKAGING CORPORATION,the corporation that executed thewithinact and foregoingd od of instrument,said corporation d acknowledged said instrument to be the free andvoluntarydas duly for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that w authorized to elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation,that was execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature of Notary) (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at • My appointment expires: PAGE'a PARKING COVENANT 1/25100 2 P 4 (23457-0002/SH993550.282] 01/25/00 16:58 FAX 206 583 8500 P_xxins Wit --•• -_• • • EXHIBIT A -- DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A - THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARCEER OF ST,NORTHEAST GQ COUNTY, ARTER, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RAN WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8401050426 AND LYING NORTH OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY 810527072DS2 ARECND B RDED66UNDA RECORDING NOS. 8010060645, S011170558, LYING EAST OF THE WEST 90 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET AND OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'51" EAST ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET 763,87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°27'31" WEST 39.00 FEET TO THERSOUTHERLY POD OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET A. D BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01°27'31" WEST 905.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°36'51" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 670.90 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°31'48" AND A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, FOR A DISTANCE OF 86.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°54' 57" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY IGH795.6 O -W Y LINE OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST FOR A DISTANCE ET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°28'11" AND A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'51" EAST ALONG THESOUTHERLYTHE ROF BEGINNING. -O -WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET 664.69 FEET TO PAGE .5 PARKING COVENANT 1R5�00 2 5 [23487-0002/S B993 550.2821 CITY OF RENTON. Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: January 27, 2000 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services ` FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning SUBJECT: Parking Covenant for Seattle Packaging 1000 SW 43rd Street Seattle Packaging has submitted a draft parking covenant as required by the approval of a parking modification request for the above referenced property. The covenant contains provisions,,which were required and agreed upon by the City. The property referenced above is also known as Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat, File.No. LUA-99-103, SHPL-A. A copy of the draft parking covenant is attached. At your earliest convenience, please review the document for the appropriate legal description. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to the City Attorney for review of the document's language and format. Your timely review would be appreciated. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at 430- 7270. Thank you. cc: Jennifer Henning Yellow File CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: ' January 27, 2000 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning" SUBJECT: Parking Covenant for Seattle Packaging 1000 SW 43rd Street As part of the land use application submitted for additions to the existing structure, Seattle Packaging requested a parking modification to provide less than the minimum number of spaces required by the parking regulations. The original parking modification request was denied on December 7, 1999. The applicant subsequently filed an appeal of the denial (mostly as a placeholder)as well as a revised parking modification request. The revised request proposed the filing of a parking covenant, which would require the creation of additional parking stalls at the City's request as well as review of a detailed parking analysis with any change of use, tenant improvement, etc. The revised modification was approved on December 30, 1999 (attached)with conditions requiring revisions to the draft covenant. Staff has worked closely with the applicant in revising the covenantlanguage so that it is acceptable to both parties. A copy of the final version of the draft parking covenant is attached. At your earliest convenience, please review the document for the appropriate language and format. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to Property Services for review of the legal descriptions. The applicant has chosen to postpone the appeal hearing and will wait to withdraw the appeal until the required approvals of the covenant have been obtained,so your timely review would be appreciated. if you have,any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. Thank you. cc: Jennifer Henning ciellow File CITY L.-2 RENTON , Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor December 30, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Ms. Laura Whitaker JAN 0 3 1999 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue,48th Floor RECEIVED Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 -- SUBJECT: REVISED PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK . . CENTRE,FILE NO.LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Whitaker: Thank you for submitting the revised parking modification request(copy attached)pertaining to the SeaPack Centre. Our evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has submitted a revised parking modification request (attached) from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. A previous modification request was denied on December 7, 1999 (al;so attached). As a result of that decision, the applicant (Seattle Packaging) is' proposing new project components intended to address parking concerns. Section,4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 December 30, 1999 - Page 2 of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47-new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space— requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. The proposed 245 parking spaces for the site would result in 65 spaces less than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application and was subsequently denied. On December 27, 1999,the applicant submitted a revised parking modification request. In the revised request, the applicant is proposing to record a Parking Covenant to run with the land. The covenant specifies that 245 stalls will be provided on-site prior to the completion of the renovation project. At the City's request when it is determined to be necessary, an additional 30 stalls would be created in an area currently utilized for loading areas. The creation of the additional stalls would require the closure of loading doors, which the applicant has agreed to. The additional stalls would result in a total of 275 parking spaces parking spaces for the site—only 35 spaces fewer than the minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification is required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was submitted with the site plan application. According to the study, a total of 310 parking spaces would be required for the site. This includes 151 stalls for areas dedicated to manufacturing use(based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,000 square feet/150,971 square feet of manufacturing space proposed) and 159 stalls for areas dedicated to warehouse use Document2\cor December 30, 1999 Page 3 (based on'a ratio of 1 stall per 1,500 square feet/237,936 square feet of warehouse space proposed). The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on- site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations (office). The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. Furthermore, as indicated by the draft parking covenant included with the request, 30 additional stalls would be created in the event the City determines the additional stalls are necessary for SeaPack's use of the site. The requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. The proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed parking covenant would allow the City to require the.property owner to create 30 additional stalls in the event impacts to adjacent properties become evident. 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. The proposed parking covenant would ensure that additional spaces are provided when, and if, the City determines more spaces are needed for the use of the site by Seattle (Packaging. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criterion number 2, the proposed parking would not create ;adverse impacts from the SeaPack Centre to other properties in the vicinity. In addition, cross access and transient truck parking easements are to be established as part of the short plat involving the subject site. These easements would ensure loading vehicles would not eliminate required parking stalls. In order to further reduce impacts to adjacent properties, the proposed parking Document2\cor December 30, 1999 Page 4 covenant would allow the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls at any time the spaces are determined to be necessary. Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- site parking spaces. The parking covenant proposed to be recorded and run with the title for the property would allow for the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls when the City determines the stalls are necessary. The 275 total stalls proposed would be 35 spaces less than the minimum required by code. Based on the parking study provided by the applicant, it is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. The parking covenant would allow for the City to require the creation of additional stalls if determined to be necessary for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. The revised parking modification request is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Parking Covenant shall be revised to include the following: • A provision which requires the submission of a detailed parking analysis to be reviewed and approved by the'City when application is made for any change in use, tenant improvement, building permit, or business license for a new occupant for the subject property; • Language which discloses that future uses/expansions on the property may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient; and 2. After the review and approval of the revised parking covenant by the City Attorney and the Property Services section, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded document to the project manager prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the renovated building. Sincerely, 9Ii(1e7q // /(0/Gregg Zirherman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Document2\cor 41/25/00 16:57 FAX 206 583 8500 rtKAIL t,uin After recording, return to: Perkins Coie ]201 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Seattle,WA 98101 PARKING COVENANT Grantor: Seattle Packaging Corporation Grantee: City of Renton Abbreviated Legal Description: Parcel A of that Ptn. of NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East,W.M. Tax Assessor's Parcel No.: This Parking Covenant is made on the day of , 2000, by Seattle Packaging Corporation, a Washington corporation("Owner"). RECITALS : A. Owner is the owner of certain real property situated in Kire County, Washington and described on EXHIBIT A attached hereto (the"Property"). B. Owner has submitted to the City of Renton("City") a site plan("Site Plan") for the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and numberLUA-99- 16o ting office SA-A, ECF space In connection on the Property. The Site Plan has project with the Site Plan, Owner has requested a modification from Section 4-4-080F10e of the City's parking regulations in order to provide 275 parking stalls, less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code, but more than sufficient for Owner's employee count at full employment. C. The City has agreed to approve the requested parking modification, provided that Owner executes and records upon substantial completion of the Project this Parking Covenant as a covenant running with the land. • PAGE 1 PARKING COVENANT Il25/00 2 I (234S7-0002/Sa90355 0.232] •01./25/00 16:58 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS U WE • AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants vais follows: contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner herebyagrees 1. The 275 parking stalls referenced in Recital B, above, will be provided as follows: (a) 245 stalls will be striped upon substantial completion of the Project. (b) An additional 30 stalls ("Additional Stalls")will be provided within 45 days of written request by the Administrator of the City's Planning/Building/Public Works Department,which request shall be at the Administrator's sole and complete discretion. (c) Owner acknowledges that provision of the Additional Stalls may require closure of one or more of the Project's dock doors. 2. Upon application for any change in use, tenant improvements, building permit, or business license for a new occupant(i.e. other than Seattle Packaging, Inc. or Adventure 2000, Inc.) for the subject property, a detailed parking analysis must be submitted for the City's review and approval. 3. Future changes of use for site development that expands present uses or employee counts beyond those projected in the parking study for SeaPack Centre prepared by The Transpo Group, dated October 18, 1999, may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient. 4. The covenants set forth herein constitute covenants running with the land, shall be binding upon the Property, and shall be binding upon Owner and its assigns. 5. The provisions of this Parking Covenant shall continue in full force and effect in perpetuity from the date hereof, unless terminated with the written consent of the City as set forth in an executed and acknowledged instrument recorded in the real property records of King County, Washington. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner has executed this Parking Covenant as of the date first written above. PAGE 2 PARKING COVENANT 1/25/00 2:56 2 (23487-0002/SB993 550.282J 01/25/00 16;58 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS WitVV,Jf WV! SEATTLE PACKAG]NG CORPORATION By Name: Title: • • • PAGE PARKING COVENANT 1/25/00 2'SG PM [23 487-000 M 9 93 5 5 0.2 S2] -01/25/00 16:58 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS COIE uuoiuur • STATE OF WASI-IINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this_ day of December, 1999,before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and swosonally appeared ton ne known to be the person who signed as' of SEATTLE PACKAGING CORPORATION,the corporation that executed thewia thin ctand foregoingd o of instrument,d corporationand acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary as duly for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that; w authorized to elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation,that was execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature of Notary) (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at • My appointment expires: • pAGE a PARKING COVENANT U25l00 2 A6 4 (23457-0002/Sa9935502321 01/25/00 16:58 FAX 206 583 .8500 PERKINS COIL 1� EXIT A _ DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A .- - THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8401050426 AND LYING NORTH OF SOUTHWEST . 43RD STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON 8105270722BY EDSANDRECORDED ORD 06 UNDERR RECORDING NOS. 8010060645, S011170558, LYING EAST OF THE WEST 90 FEET O SAIDP NORTHEAST Q DASTERIBOOFD THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, BEING M S FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT AVENUE SOUTHWE$TINTERSECTION OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET AND O� THENCE SOUTH 88°36'51" EAST ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET 763.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°27'31" WEST 39 STREET ANDHE THE OUTERLY PO>NT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 4 ST BEGINNING; • THENCE SOUTH 01°27'31" WEST 905.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°36'51" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 670.90 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°31'48" AND A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, FOR A DISTANCE OF 86.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°54' 57" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIG79 T PEE AY LINE OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST FOR A DISTANCE THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°28'11" AND A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'51" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET 664.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF PAGE 5 PARKING COVENANT 1/25i00 2 P 5 [23487-0002/SB993 550.282] AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the • -_ SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL. __ 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent,Washington.98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and hash ,for more than six months } NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING ^�, • RENTON HEARING EXAMINER prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language RENTON,.WASHINGTON continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County ' An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ' Renton Hearing Examinerat his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the State of Washington for King County. , . 7th floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, _ The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County . on February 1,2000 at 9:00 AM to consid- Journal not in su lemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers er the following petition: (andPP 9 Y SEATTLE PACKAGING during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a AAD-99-181 • Appeal of the City's administrative decision. to deny harking mod•-ca_q.g_requ File Seattle Packaging -AAD-99-1811 No. - 0A 99 156 SA A ECF for the .SeaPack entre project. Location: 1000 1 published •on: 1/21/00 ., • SW 43rd St. as All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at•the Public The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$31.63, Hearing. Questions should be directed.to the Hearing Examiner,425-430-6515. Charged to Acct. No. 8051067. ; Publication,Date:January 21,2000 • Published in the South County Journal Legal Number 7110 January 21,2000.7110 Legal Clerk, uth County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of 1 , 2000 �®voQ�ti f.1. F a pP • ,(0.2-J.,,,,- -A,,\_---7,i_o( ,_ _ .,. 1 Notary Public of the State of Washington lS �`� m residing in Renton �vo Pc`yg-b King County, Washington ,F y NO TICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on February 1,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petition: SEATTLE PACKAGING AAD-99-181 Appea tie C't 's ad. ' i trative decision to deny parking modification request, File No. UA-99-156 SA-A,E=CF0f?,the SeaPack Centre project. Location: 1000 SW 43rd St. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner, 425-430-6515. Publication Date: January 21, 1999 Account No. 51067 aadpub PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE,48TH FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 • • December 17, 1999 Via Facsimile & Regular Mail /C 93Id Slave Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal by Seattle Packaging of Administrative Decision to Deny Parking Modification Request, File No. LUA-99156, SA-A, CCF Dear Mr. Examiner: • On December 7, 1999, the Administrator of the Planning/BuildingfPublic Works Department signed a decision("City Decision,"attached at Exhibit A) denying a parking modification request by Seattle Packaging("SeaPack's Request")for its • proposed new facility at the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43rd Street in Renton. Please consider this letter to be an appeal of the City Decision. At the outset, it is important to note that we are in ongoing discussions with the City to address its parking concerns and have reason to believe that this issue will be resolved outside of the appeal process. Should it be necessary to pursue the appeal, however, its basis is summarized below: 1. Parking proposed for SeaPack's new Renton facility meets or exceeds all criteria for parking modification established by the Renton Code. • As the City.Decision indicates, "It is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by SeaPack Centre." City Decision at 4. This conclusion is supported by SeaPack's Request, a Parking Study prepared by TRANSPO, and the City's own determinations (also set fOrth in the City Decision) that SeaPack's Request meets all parking modification criteria established by the Code. The sole basis for the City's decision to deny SeaPack's request is its concern that future users of the SeaPack Property may require more parking than the SeaPack operation. The use of the site by future users is not a parking modification criterion; indeed, one of the criterion emphasizes that the [09901-0001/SB993510.230] • ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE:RUSSELL&DuMOULIN.VANCOUVER.CANADA -.l December 17, 1999 Page 2 required showing is limited to "the use and situation intended." See, City Decision at • 4. The City's Decision is based on criteria other than those established by Code and should be reversed. 2. . Seattle Packaging can mitigate any perceived adverse parking effects. Seattle Packaging's site is benefited by a reciprocal easement agreement that, among other things, provides for transitory truck parking on an adjacent parcel, a right that will ensure that vehicular parking stalls are not used by trucks during loading and unloading. In addition, Seattle Packaging will.add to its proposal an agreement to submit monitoring reports to the City on a periodic basis to confirm that employee counts do not exceed those projected in the TRANSPO Parking Study. For the reasons set forth above, the City's Decision to deny SeaPack's Request should be reversed. I enclose the City's filing fee of$75.00. Respectfully s u bmitt ed, i."4/1/Lit Laura N. Whitaker LNW:jcm Enclosure cc: Mr. Gregg Zimmerman Ms. Lesley Nishihira Jack Alkire, Esq. [09901-0001/SB993510.230] - 12/17/99 CITY _F RENTON ht% Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor December 30, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Ms. Laura Whitaker JAN 0 3 1999 Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue,48th Floor RECEIVED Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 SUBJECT: REVISED PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK CENTRE,FILE NO.LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Whitaker: Thank you for submitting the revised parking modification request(copy attached)pertaining to the SeaPack Centre. Our evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has submitted a revised parking modification request (attached) from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces,required by code. A previous modification request was denied on December 7, 1999 (also attached). As a result of that decision, the applicant (Seattle Packaging) is' proposing new project components intended to address parking concerns. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 I®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer December 30, 1999 Page 2 of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone and is currently developedwith'an,existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space— requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. The proposed 245 parking spaces for the site would result in 65 spaces less than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application and was subsequently denied. On December 27, 1999, the applicant submitted a revised parking modification request. In the revised request, the applicant is proposing to record a Parking Covenant to run with the land. The covenant specifies that 245 stalls will be provided on-site prior to the completion of the renovation project. At'the City's request when it is determined to be necessary, an additional 30 stalls would be created in an area currently utilized for loading areas. The creation of the additional stalls would require the closure of loading doors, which the applicant has agreed to. The additional stalls would result in a total of 275 parking spaces parking spaces for the site—only 35 spaces fewer than the minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification is required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was submitted with the site plan application. According to the study, a total of 310 parking spaces would be required for the site. This includes 151 stalls for areas dedicated to manufacturing use(based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,000 square feet/150,971 square feet of manufacturing space proposed) and 159 stalls for areas dedicated to warehouse use Document2\cor December 30, 1999 Page 3 (based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,500 square feet/237,936 square feet of warehouse Space proposed). The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on- site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations (office). The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls-proposed to be provided would be utilized. Furthermore, as indicated by the draft parking covenant included with the request, 30 additional stalls would be created in the event the City determines the additional stalls are necessary for SeaPack's use of the site. The requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and !emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking forthe intended use of the property. The proposal would not be ,injurious to other properties in the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed parking covenant would allow the City to require the property owner to create 30 additional stalls in the event impacts to adjacent properties become evident. 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. The proposed parking covenant would ensure that additional spaces are provided when, and if, the City determines more spaces are needed for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criterion number 2, the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts from the SeaPack Centre to other properties in the vicinity. In addition, cross access and transient truck parking easements are to be established as part of the short plat involving the subject site. These easements would ensure loading vehicles would not eliminate required parking stalls. In order to further reduce impacts to adjacent properties, the proposed parking Document2\cor December 30, 1999 Page 4 covenant would allow the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls at any time the spaces are determined to be necessary. Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- site parking spaces. The parking covenant proposed to be recorded and run with the title for the property would allow for the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls when,the City determines the stalls are necessary. The 275 total stalls proposed would be 35 spaces less than the minimum required by code. Based on the parking study provided by the applicant, it is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. The parking covenant would allow for the City to require the creation of additional stalls if determined to be necessary for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. The revised parking modification request is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Parking Covenant shall be revised.to include the following: • A provision which requires the'submission of a detailed parking analysis to be reviewed and approved by the-:City when application is made for any change in use, tenant improvement,:building:permit, or business license for a new occupant for the subject property; • Language which discloses.that future uses/expansions on the property may require additional land use review (e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient; and 2. After the review and approval of the revised parking covenant by the City Attorney and the Property Services section, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded document to the project manager prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the renovated building. Sincerely, 9!)4e7 31/4fArreiegf Gregg Ziin Kerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Document2\cor COMCUREEMCE T SERVIOeS DLOPMEN cm(OF RENTOM Dim a 1a.•��i•9q JAB 0 3 1999 NAME E ;l i li.L/DATE CITY OF RENTON �•$ISHIH.II?A [.MN/!7.• 3 geCE`V nning/Building/Public Works 14sN .1 tt4G1 . 14 ! !2 2-�j MEMORANDUM S. HANS014 /�- . Jf/ ( DATE: December 28, 1999 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator CAO FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner(x7270) (�P SUBJECT: Revised Parking Modification Request— �� SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF G/� Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has submitted a revised parking modification request(attached)from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. A previous modification request was denied on December 7, 1999 (also attached). As a result of that decision, the applicant(Seattle Packaging) is proposing new project components intended to address parking concerns. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250D2): a.: Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and bJ Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d! Can be shown to be justified and required for the,use and situation intended; and e: Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas,which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4'-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\Projects\99-156.In\revisedmod.doc CITY OF RINTON Planning/DUIldingIPuplic Works MEMORANDUM DATE: December 28, 1999 1 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner(x7270) SUBJECT: Revised Parking Modification Request— SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has submitted a revised parking modification request (attached)from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. A previous modification request was denied on December 7, 1999 (also attached). As a result of that decision, the applicant (Seattle Packaging) is proposing new project components intended to address parking concerns. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual''cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- - 250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total of 310 parking spaces'to be provided on-site. The proposed 245 parking spaces for the site would result in 65 spaces less than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request H:\DIVISIONS\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJ ECTS\99-156.In\revisedmod.doc was submitted with the site plan application and was subsequently denied. On December 27, 1999, the applicant submitted a revised parking modification request. In the revised request,the applicant is proposing to record a Parking Covenant to run with the land. The covenant specifies that 245 stalls will be provided on-site prior to the completion of the renovation project. At the City's request when it is determined to be necessary, an additional 30 stalls would be created in an area currently utilized for loading areas. The creation of the • additional stalls would require the closure of loading doors, which the applicant has agreed to. The additional stalls would result in a total of 275 parking spaces parking spaces for the site— only 35 spaces fewer than the minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification is required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. l In the event the modification request is not approved,the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was submitted with the site plan application. According to the study, a total of 310 parking spaces would be required for the site. This includes 151 stalls for areas dedicated to manufacturing use (based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,000 square feet/150,971 square feet of manufacturing space proposed) and 159 stalls for areas dedicated to warehouse use (based on a ratio of 1 stall per 1,500 square feet/237,936 square feet of warehouse space proposed). The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on- site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations (office). The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. Furthermore, as indicated by the draft parking covenant included with the request, 30 additional stalls would be created in the event the City determines the additional stalls are necessary for SeaPack's use of the site. The requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of.the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. The proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed parking covenant would allow the City to require the property owner to create 30 additional stalls in the event impacts to adjacent properties become evident. 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\99-156.In\revisedmod.doc r • 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study,the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore,the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. The proposed parking covenant would ensure that additional spaces are provided when, and if, the City determines more spaces are needed for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criterion number 2,the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts from the SeaPack Centre to other properties in the vicinity. In addition, cross access and transient truck parking easements are to be established as part of the short plat involving the subject site. These easements would ensure loEding vehicles would not eliminate required parking stalls. In order to further reduce impacts to adjacent properties, the proposed parking covenant would allow the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls at any time the spaces are determined to be necessary. Recommendation The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on-site parking spaces. The parking covenant proposed to be recorded and run with the title for the property would allow for the City to require the creation of 30 additional stalls when the City determines the stalls are necessary. The 275 total stalls proposed would be 35 spaces less than the minimum required by code. Based on the parking study provided by the applicant, staff recognizes that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. The parking covenant would allow for the City to require the creation of additional stalls if determined to be necessary for the use of the site by Seattle Packaging. The covenant does not, however, include provisions that require any future changes in use, tenant improvements, or building permits to trigger the re-evaluation of on-site parking. The covenant should disclose that future uses/expansions may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient. In addition, the covenant should establish that the City has the right to revoke business licenses if parking problems are found to arise on the site. Staff recommends the approval of the revised parking modification request, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Parking Covenant shall be revised to include the following: • Provisions which require the submission of a detailed parking analysis to be reviewed and approved by the City when application is made for any change in use, tenant improvement, building permit, or business license for a new occupant for the subject property; • Language which discloses that future uses/expansions on the property may require additional land use review(e.g., SEPA review) and may not be allowed unless it can be demonstrated that on-site parking is sufficient; and • Language that establishes the City has the right to revoke any business license for the property if parking problems become evident for the site. 2. After the review and approval of the revised parking covenant by the City Attorney and the Property Services section, the applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded document to the project manager prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the renovated building. cc: Jennifer Henning H:\DIV ISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\99-156.In\revisedmod.doc ` t • • .4001101 34. SW.41W STREET K m .0 -- -- ------ }1-I-}f.1-EH-14i-1-FHH-1-. --�---FH-1-FH-Fhb--i1-Ff�=IJH-FH+F ° 111111 I .-:::: ::: /l0 T T 0 u44�I.e s ms Y d �' ff (� ? ? ? 7 ? ? ? ?:(i eu 5 -i ''1I f 4 . II � f i IIIIII I f IIIIItM Hill , 0--1 _ _ . 1 Cc�jortR Ji 1 I e-° I " ,- o j! k ...•.•....• •�.. ...n.n....... I I I I I I I I I I I l i i 1 i i i i i i i i i i i 1 1 i r ' j • , i iiii iiii iiiii i i i i "'; � N i 1 1 i • i i i i i l i i i ';' ' jai --- — i O o i--t—i---1-----i---i--T- i-- ---' -T--j--i--T--i-- Y--1---E--i---' -:. I -0 *0 i I II I I I I I I I I I I III I � c � i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --,0 —�— —i-- ——I— i —I— ———+---4----+---i-- ---. -----+ !---0 W G i — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I i8 4 .. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i IIIII 8'° I I I v a 0! . L J--,L----1---L--!——I—°—— L--1J--1 -J--—L-J_ 1 ° , _ i �o iqT° rra _`>t I I I I I I I I I I I I l i -0 ' q 8 i 1:14: t 1 1 1 i i i i i i i i i i I I I111 I I T 0—�� `#I;y; — — — — --- —I— 1 I -- I ® kid�.:°r°_ Itil- w ' �t i `Tx , :.Vi„ T_-1 -i 1P T--I -1—T 1 Y Y—I--1`"' `m' . d'; 1 -0 m j—1P•._- As_ :::::;;, I I I I I I I I I I I I I iii ,1§ r) G, rTvRE°i t ----iJ i i i i i i i I I 1 e3 ' ! y j ADD1T1 s, o-———°—i—+ — ——i--i—+--1—°——° 1---+--1—-i---I——+--1- 1=_+-. ' --0 W J I I I I I I I I I I I I '— I (/)cn ° SIMASs pL. I I I I , I I I I I I I j 1. io-- �� —LJ— —J—L� J- ---L--> —I-1-J— 1-J—�-L -i 1---o ao i , 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I mil 1 i i I 1 1.- f' 1 j / ., < , PROPOSED SITE PLAN NOTES 1.; ' I TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OP SITE 668.500 GSP. I 1,11 4 3 0 I �..�I mw La I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I - — FIRST FLOORIEXISTING AND PROPOSED)324.080 GSP. 1 I 1 I 1 1 i1 I I I ro125199 SETT APPROVAL SECOND FLOORIPROPOSEDI 18A50 GSP. 1^�" 1 1 1 aro:m eur1Heneml> 1 I.4— I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I TOTAL PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 413.010 GSP. I {I,` �_----VI— I II 9° PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE SOX y V I-1--T--I---i-----i---I--T--1- - ---L--i--i--1----[ -T--i---h-T--`----r- ,--0 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA 64,160 GSF. I- !y.1 I 1 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 604531 G SF. TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 210.567 GSF ,1:�L-{ uierwo i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III 8 I Q I I I ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED 18 c l- + ma 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT O6'-b' j�f i. }-� i t I §1 _ BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE {• ARTERIAL STREETS 20' _ 11---_—_ i—_+_�_--�._—_�_—_H_+-H_-- —_.�_-_—.I—_+_-_—_—_+_�_—_h-_+_—."�' '; _ --0 L PROPOSED BUILDINGOTT1ER STREETS IV SETRALKS 2 FRONT 4 M CIO ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l y A• '.NS'SIDE 3 00 REAR I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 . ' ee.vmmms(aotnW e I - ;II i D.7, o--- fir. -© REFER TO PROPOSED PARK NGDSTUDYR BY G THE HEATRANSPOIS GROUP 1/ I I I I I I I I I° I 11 I 1 1 1 1 y!Y, 1I STANDARD STALLS 201 I' l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COMPACT STALLS 16X1 58 i, i •- '} I 11 -1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 I 1 1 S' ~ ACCESSIBLE STALLS e TOTAL STALLS 245 - - i I se I ; —1—T-I.— I I r 1 1 I 4---1 1 1 1 1 -- 1--ht x�� * —O LEGEND ' I b ---- -1 i.5 1 I 1 I 1 1 11 ti:r,� I 1 1 I 1 I ' '''' :I Q AREA OF NEW PARKING STALLS .; t;,�ir; I. Ilan' l l I _ I 1 J Emo AREA OF NEW LANDSCAPING T C ING I � PROPOSED 9TE PLAN 4 f:2t✓vi I x - AREA OP NEW INTERIOR WORK i0 _ 4- '� � :�:: �1 - (; 1I / I rERISTING BUILDING - q. > � �� - �' II'> ° �` II�IT i 1 1 i i���� NO PARKING AREA I F S{0 RI ,KN ( , 00065 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 6 SITE PLAN b—- '�........ --—m` rT- ^. _"' t N1..�a, ' y 0 i +7 0 0 O O b 0 O o-. n.,,;.`:+i i u m ® m m m m b O aD a SW.43ra STREET en V\ - Lc o., i'�. °.1.�4L-t PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, 48TH FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 DEVELOPMENT P TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 CITY®F RENTON 1N LAURA N.WHITAKER 206-583-8584 DEC 2 '7 1999 WHITL@PERKINSCOIE. RECEIVED December 22, 1999 Via Facsimile and Regular Mail Gregg Zimmerman City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Revised Parking Modification Request Dear Gregg: As you know, Seattle Packaging submitted a Parking Modification Request to the City on October 22, 1999 ("Original Request," see Exhibit A, attached) for its proposed renovation of an existing warehouse building located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43rd Street. The Original Request was denied in a letter signed by you on December 7, 1999; Seattle Packaging filed an appeal of that denial on December 17, 1999. In light of recent discussions between the City and Seattle Packaging, Seattle Packaging hereby submits a Revised Parking Modification Request proposing new project components designed to address the City's parking concerns. In particular, the project will now provide a total of 275 parking stalls: 245 to be striped upon substantial completion of the project and an additional 30 to be provided upon request by the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, at his or her sole discretion. The City's authority to require the additional 30 stalls will be documented in a Parking Covenant to be recorded with the King County Department of Records & Elections upon substantial completion of the Seattle Packaging project. With a total of 275 parking stalls, and in light of analysis contained in Transpo's "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building" (October 18, 1999), the [23487-0002/SB993550.263] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER, CANADA December 22, 1999 Page 2 Seattle Packaging facility will contain 35 fewer parking stalls than required by Code. Other than this change, analysis of the facility's consistency with the City's parking modification criteria contained in the Original Request is incorporated herein by reference. Attached please find our proposed form of Parking Covenant. Please note that by the time the Project is constructed, it may be owned by a new Gordon Younger - owned Corporation called Adventure 2000, in which case Adventure 2000 will be the owner for purposes of the Parking Covenant. If this Revised Parking Modification Request and the form of Parking Covenant meet with your approval, please let me know in writing. We will then withdraw our appeal. Thank you for your consideration of this Revised Request, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions regarding it. Very truly yours, Laura N. Whitaker LNW:jcm cc: Ms. Sue Carlson M's. Lesley Nishihira Jack Alkire, Esq. • [23487-0002/SB993550.2631 12/22/99 • After recording, return to: • • PARKING COVENANT Grantor: Seattle Packaging Corporation Grantee: City of Renton • • Abbreviated Legal Description: . Full legal description is on EXHIBIT A. Tax Assessor's Parcel No.: This Parking Covenant is made on the day of , 1999, by Seattle Packaging Corporation, a Washington corporation ("Owner"). RECITALS : A. Owner is the owner of certain real property situated in King County, Washington and described on EXHIBIT A attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Owner has submitted to the City of Renton ("City") a site plan ("Site Plan") for the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space ("Project") on the Property. The Site Plan has project number LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF. In connection with the Site Plan, Owner has requested a modification from Section 4-4-080F 10e of the • City's parking regulations in order to provide 275 parking stalls, less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code, but more than sufficient for Owner's employee count at full employment. • C. The City has agreed to approve the requested parking modification, provided that Owner executes and records upon substantial completion of the Project this Parking • Covenant as a covenant running with the land. PARKING COVENANT PAGE 1 [23487-0002/SB993550.282J 12/21/99 3:35 PM AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner hereby agrees as follows: 1.; The parties agree that the 275 parking stalls referenced in Recital B, above, will be provided as follows: . (a) 245 stalls will be striped upon substantial completion of the Project. • • (b) An additional 30 stalls'("Additional Stalls")will be provided within 45 days of written request by the Administrator of the City's Planning/Building/Public Works Department, which request shall be at the Administrator's sole and complete discretion. (c). The parties acknowledge that provision of the Additional Stalls may require closure of one or more of the Project's dock doors. 2. The covenants set forth herein constitute covenants running with the land, shall be binding upon the Property, and shall be binding upon Owner and its assigns. 3. The provisions of this Parking Covenant shall continue in full force and effect in perpetuity from the date hereof, unless terminated with the written consent of the City as set forth in an executed and acknowledged instrument recorded in the real property records of King County, Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner has executed this Parking Covenant as of the date first written above. • SEATTLE PACKAGING CORPORATION By Name: Title: • PARKING COVENANT • PAGE 2 . [23487-0002/SB993550.282] 12/21/99 3:56 PM • •, • STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF On this day of December, 1999, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the person who signed as of SEATTLE PACKAGING CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that was duly elected, qualified and acting as said officer of the corporation, that was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. • (Signature of Notary) • (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires: PARKING COVENANT PAGE 3 [23487-0002/SB993550.282] 12/21/99 3:35 PM EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • PARKING COVENANT PAGE 4 [23487-0002/SB993550.282] 12/21/99 3:35 PM • • PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888,• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 October 22, 1999 • Lesley Nishihira Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Parking Modification Request Dear Lesley: ,As described in the "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building" (October 18, 1999) prepared by The Transpo Group ("Transpo"), Seattle Packaging Corporation ("SeaPack") proposes to consolidate its packaging operations into an existing warehouse building ("Building") located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue . S.W. and S.W. 43`d Street in Renton. SeaPack's use of the Building will require its renovation to include manufacturing and office space in addition to the existing warehouse use. On-site surface parking will be provided, totaling 245 striped parking stalls. This letter is a request for modification of applicable City Code requirements for minimum parking stall quantity. Request for Modification of Parking Stall Requirements As noted above, the SeaPack project includes 245 striped parking stalls. The Parking Study notes that the renovated Building requires a minimum of 310 parking stalls under City Code. Therefore, the project contains 65 fewer stalls than required by Code. City Code authorizes the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to authorize a modification from minimum/maximum parking requirements (RMC 4-4- • 080(F)(10)d, e). Such modifications must be based on criteria set forth at RMC 4-9- 250(D)(2). The criteria and the bases for the project's conformance with them are set forth below. EXHIBIT A [23487-000203992950.240] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN, VANCOUVER, CANADA • October 22, 1999 Page 2 '1. A specific reason makes the strict letter of the Code impractical. The Building renovation will entail alteration of an existing warehouse and associated surface parking lot. Alterations necessary to meet the developer's program requirements will result in removal of some stalls. For this reasons, the strict letter of the Code with respect to minimum parking requirements is impractical. 2. The modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Code. The Code's on site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts on surrounding properties. As the Traffic Study demonstrates, at full employment the SeaPack project will utilize less than the 245 stalls provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the Code. In particular, the existing side contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the.west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east,side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand;throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site.. . 3. The modification: a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability [23487-0002/sB992950.240] 10/22/99 j C I . October 22, 1999 Page 3 • intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and • Please see response to"criterion 2, above. b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. c. [Will] conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and Please s;ee response to criterion 2, above. d. - Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Please see response to criterion 2, above.. e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Please see response to criterion 2, above. . •* * *. * Thank you for your consideration of this modification request. Should require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. you V ry truly yours, iVN‘U Laura N. Whitaker LNW:bs cc: Jack Alkire . Jay; Pickering [23487-0002/SB992950.240] ' 10/22/99 • tr October 22, 1999 Page 3 intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. • b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and • Please see response to criterion 2, above. c. [Will] conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. • d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the • use and situation intended; and • Please see response to criterion 2, above. e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. • Please see response to criterion 2, above. . * * * * • 'Thank you for your consideration of this modification request. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. V ry truly yours, . Laura N. Whitaker LNW:bs cc: Jack Alkire • Jay Pickering • • [23487-0002/SB992950.240J • 10/22/99 b Y • • October 22, 1999 Page 2 • • 1. A.specific reason makes the.strict letter of.the Code • • impractical.::. The Building renovation will entail alteration of an existing warehouse and associated surface parking lot. Alterations necessary to meet the developer's program . requirements will result in removal of some stalls. For this reasons, the strict letter of the Code with respect to minimum parking requirements is impractical. 2. The modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Code. The Code's on site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts on surrounding properties. As the Traffic Study demonstrates, at full employment the SeaPack project will utilize less than the 245 stalls provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the Code. • In particular, the existing side contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the.Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand • for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate _ . • demand throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the. Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:0.0 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at :full production capacity.. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing :. • space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the.projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. 3. The modification: • a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, . appearance, environmental protection and maintainability • • [23487-0002/SB992950.240I 10/22/99 + t PERKINS COIE LLP • • 1201 THIRD AVENUE,SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 • • • 1, , October 22, 1999 • • • • Lesley Nishihira • Planner City of Renton • Development Services Division • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Parking Modification Request • • Dear Lesley: As described in the "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building" (October 18, 1999),'prepared by The Transpo Group ("Transpo"), Seattle Packaging.Corporation ("SeaPack") proposes to consolidate its packaging operations into an existing warehouse building ("Building") located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue . S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street in Renton. SeaPack's use of the Building will require its renovation to include manufacturing and office space in addition to the existing warehouse use. On-site surface parking will be provided, totaling 245 striped parking stalls. This letter is a request for modification of applicable City Code requirements • for minimum parking stall quantity. Request for Modification of Parking Stall Requirements As noted above, the SeaPack project includes 245 striped parking stalls. The • Parking Study notes that the renovated Building requires a minimum•of 3.10.parking stalls.under City.Code., Therefore, the.project.contains 65.fewer stalls than'required . by Code. . . .. . . City Code authorizes the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to authorize a modification from minimum/maximum parking requirements (RMC 4-4- • 080(F)(10)d, e). Such modifications must be based on criteria set forth at RMC 4-9- • 250(D)(2). The criteria and the bases.for the project's conformance with them are set forth below. • IBIT B • [23487-0002/SB992950.2401 ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONC LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE:RUSSELL& DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA • " December 7, 1999 • Page 5 • • • . Sincerely, 4 e9f Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public. Works Department cc: Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira • • • • • • • • • • Document2\car December 7, 199y " Page'4 • • • 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criteria number one.: 4.) ' Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. • . • As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls ! proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. However, a change in the business operation or potential future tenants of the property ' may not have a similar employee count and would likely have the need for additional parking as required by code. • 5.) ' Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. • As stated under criteria number 2, the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the SeaPack Centre. However, in the event of a significant change in the business operation or if a future tenant occupies the property and requires additional parking, there may be • potential adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity resulting from • overflow parking. • Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- ' site parking spaces.• According to parking code requirements for manufacturing, warehouse and office uses, the proposal would have 120 spaces fewer than the amount required by code. It is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be • adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. However, there Ore no means for enforcing or guaranteeing that future uses of the site would not have a'greater number of employees, or the need.for the full amount.of parking as . required by code for The building. Tnerefore the:request„for,parking modification is.not . approved.. .. . . . . . • Other options for complying with the conditions of approval for the site plan might be available. The applicant could explore the establishment of cross parking agreements between parcels A, B and C in order to accommodate the 120 additional spaces. required for the SeaPack Centre. • • • • Document2\cor f. " December 7, 1999 • Page 3 . • based on a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area of manufacturing use, plus 1 space per 1,500 square feet of warehouse use. Based on • • . the.app.licant's parking.analysis, the building contains,.approximately.150,971.square feet. . • . • • of-manufacturing.-space and 237,93.6 square feet of warehouse space requiring a total - of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. However, if evaluated under the strict interpretation of the parking regulations, separate parking for the office use of the site would also be necessary. Parking for office use is based on a minimum of 3 to a • • maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of area. This would result in a total of 365 required on-site parking spaces, or 120 spaces greater than the proposed amount. • The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand • estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. The applicant has also stated that in the event of full employment, the use of the site would be at full capacity. Therefore, any future growth • that would generate the need for additional parking would necessitate the facility's relocation to another site. • The code's on-site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts to surrounding properties. As demonstrated by the parking study submitted with the • application and regardless of the correct parking analysis, at full employment the • • SeaPack Centre would utilize less than the 245 stalls proposed to be provided. . . Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking . • regulations by providing.sufficient on-site parking for the use'of the:site.• The proposal. • would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. However, any significant change such as growth in employment, introduction of outdoor fleet vehicles that would occupy parking spaces, or other, could create a situation in which insufficient on-site parking was available for this use. • 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. • • The proposed parking satisfies code'requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. Therefore, in this regard the proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. • The site is part of a larger.proPerty, which is currently under.review for subdivision.into • • three lots: This subdivision would result in individual property boundaries for the subject. • site.(proposed parcel A), as well as for the adjacent Boeing:building (proposed parcel B) and IKEA(proposed parcel C) Although the parking situation on the overall property is pre-existing. the subdivision of the property would require each lot to individually satisfy the parking requirements. Based on a parking analysis conducted with the proposed short plat, parcel B would provide 249 parking spaces (246 to 252 required) and parcel C would provide 725 parking spaces (382 required). The existing situation has not been found to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity and the parking provided would be adequate for the proposed renovations to parcel A. However, future potential uses of the site, combined with the pending subdivision of the property, would be potentially injurious to other properties in the vicinity if made to absorb overflow parking. . • Document2\cor • • December 7, 199', • Page 2 • Background • • The subjectproposal.would.:result in-the.construction.of new.warehouse,manufacturing.' • •and.supporting office space,•including a 38,100 square foot,building addition on the ... •' south'side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center • of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the • existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than . the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking p ng spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The • proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would 'create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of • 245 on-site parking spaces. • Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations require the provision of a specified number • of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space.and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space- requiring a total•of . . • •• 310 parking spaces to be provided Because the proposed number of stalls is 65:• . • • •spaces fewer than the minimum number of spaces required by code, the applicant has included a parking modification request and parking study with the site plan application. • The approval of the parking modification will be required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the • applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking • agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. • Analysis • • • • 1.)•: . . Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance,'environmental. •• • •• • •protection and maintainability intended'by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was subm tted • with the site plan application. The parking analysis provided in the study indicates that the square footage for office use was incorporated into the amount of square footage listed under manufacturing use. According to the study, parking rates for manufacturing and warehouse uses typically account for 5 to 15 percent of those spaces as supporting dffice use. The completed center would have approximately 27,782 square feet of office use, which equates to 7 percent of the building area. The applicant contends that the • 245 parking spaces to be provided on-site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations (office). • • • Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. For example, the required parking would be • • • Document2\cor ;y; j CITY --JF RENTON 1 . - Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • December 7, 1999 Ms.Laura Whitaker... . •• • ' • Perkins.Coie LLP . 1201.Third Avenue, Suite.4800 • Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 SUBJECT: PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK CENTRE,FILE • NO. LUA-99156,SA-A,ECF • • Dear Ms. Whitaker: We have reviewed the submitted parking modification request (copy attached) pertaining • to the SeaPack Center, and our evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation,:has requested a modification from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations in order to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. The subject site is currently utilized by Seattle Packaging for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. As part of renovations proposed under the site plan application referenced above, modifications to parking . areas are proposed. The applicant would like to provide 245 parking spaces for the site —65 spaces fewer than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking • standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria • (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): . .a. . .. Will meet the objectives..,and safety; function.,appearance, environmental • protection:and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based•upon • sound engineering judgment;and • b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and • d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and • e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. ---- EXHIBIT A• - • Document21cor 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 December 17, 1999 Page 2 required showing is limited to "the:use and situation intended." See, City Decision at 4. The City's Decision is based on criteria other than those established by Code and should be reversed. 2. Seattle Packaging can mitigate any perceived adverse parking effects. Seattle Packaging's site is benefited by a reciprocal easement agreement that, among other things, provides for transitory truck parking on an adjacent parcel, a right that will ensure that vehicular parking stalls are not used by trucks during loading and unloading. In addition, Seattle Packaging will add to its proposal an agreement to submit monitoring reports to the City on a periodic basis to confirm that employee counts do not exceed those projected in the TRANSPO Parking Study. For the reasons set forth above, the City's Decision to deny SeaPack's Request should be reversed. I enclose the City's filing fee of$75.00. Respectfully submitted,� klAibuL k'N-4/&___ Laura N. Whitaker LNW:jcm Enclosure cc: Mr. Gregg Zimmerman Ms. Lesley Nishihira Jack Alkire, Esq. [09901-0001/SB993510.230] - 12/17/99 4 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE,48TH FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 • • December 17, 1999. • Via Facsimile &Regular Mail Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal by Seattle Packaging of Administrative Decision to Deny Parking Modification Request, File No. LUA-99156, SA-A, CCF Dear Mr. Examiner: On December 7, 1999, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public • Works Department,signed a decision ("City Decision," attached at Exhibit A) denying _'_ a parking modification request by Seattle Packaging ("SeaPack's Request") for its proposed new facility at the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43rd Street in Renton. Please consider this letter to be an appeal of the City Decision. At the outset, it is important to note that we are in ongoing discussions with the City to address its parking concerns and have reason to believe that this issue will be resolved outside of the appeal process. Should it be necessary to pursue the appeal, however, its basis is summarized below: 1. Parking proposed for SeaPack's new Renton facility meets or exceeds all criteria for parking modification established by the Renton Code. • As the City.Decision indicates, "It is recognized that the proposed. . • parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by SeaPack Centre." City Decision at 4. This conclusion is supported by SeaPack's Request, a Parking Study prepared by TRANSPO, and the City's own determinations (also set forth in the City Decision)that SeaPack's Request meets all parking modification criteria established by the Code. The sole basis for the City's decision to deny SeaPack's request is its concern that future users of the SeaPack Property may require more parking than the SeaPack operation. The use of the site by future users is not a parking modification criterion; indeed, one of the criterion emphasizes that the [09901-0001/SB993510.230] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE:RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA CITY JF RENTON ••t� Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman DEVELOPMENT CI Y OF RENTON December 28, 1999 DEC 4 8 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Laura N. Whitaker Perkins Coie 1201 Third Avenue, 49th Floor Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Re: Administrative Appeal by Seattle Packaging re Parking Modifications Appeal File No. LUA99-181,AAD Dear Ms. Whitaker: We received your appeal dated December 17, 1999, and the hearing will be scheduled for Tuesday,February 1,2000, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall Should you have any further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Imo` Fred J. Kaufm Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman Leslie Nishihira 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 • CITY RENTON usIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 21, 1999 Mr. Jay Pickering, AIA Mithun Partners, Inc. 414 Olive Way#500 Seattle,WA 98101 SUBJECT: SeaPack Centre Project No. LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Pickering: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. The appeal of the Administrative Decision to deny the parking modification is handled through the Hearing Examiner's office. They will contact you with regard to a hearing date. Mr. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner, can be reached at(425)430-6515. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, ii/(xj fil-00—sn Lesley Nishihir Project Manager cc: Pacific NW Group/Owners Seattle Packaging Corporation FINAL 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE,48TH FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 . December 17, 1999. Via Facsimile &Regular Mail 93`d S-132 Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal by Seattle Packaging of Administrative Decision to Deny Parking Modification Request, File No. LUA-99156, SA-A, CCF Dear Mr.'Examiner: On December 7, 1999, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department signed a decision ("City Decision," attached at Exhibit A) denying a parking modification request by Seattle Packaging:("SeaPack's Request")for its proposed new facility at the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43rd Street in Renton. Please consider this letter to be an appeal of the City Decision. At the outset, it is important to note that we are in ongoing discussions with the City to address its parking concerns and have reason to believe that this issue will be resolved;outside of the appeal process. Should it be necessary to pursue the appeal, however, its basis is summarized below: 1.' Parking proposed for SeaPack's new Renton facility meets or exceeds all criteria for parking modification established by the Renton Code. As the City Decision indicates; "It is recognized that the.proposed -. parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by SeaPack Centre." City Decision at 4. This conclusion is supported by SeaPack's Request,'a Parking Study prepared by TRANSPO, and the City's own determinations (also set'forth in the City Decision)that SeaPack's Request meets all parking modification criteria established by the Code. The sole basis for the City's decision to deny SeaPack's request is its concern that future users of the SeaPack Property may require more parking than the SeaPack operation. The use of the site by future users is not a parking modification criterion; indeed, one of the criterion emphasizes that the [09901-0001/SB993510.230] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE:RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA L r ) A December 17, 1999 Page 2 required showing is:limited to"the use and situation intended." : See, City Decision at • 4. The City's Decision is based on criteria other than those established by Code and should be reversed. 2. Seattle Packaging can mitigate any perceived adverse parking effects. Seattle Packaging's site is benefited by a reciprocal easement agreement that, among other things, provides for transitory truck parking on an adjacent parcel, a right that will ensure that vehicular parking stalls are not used by trucks during loading and unloading. In addition, Seattle Packaging will,add to its proposal an agreement to submit monitoring.reports to the City on a periodic basis to confirm that employee counts do not exceed those projected in the TRANSPO Parking Study. For the reasons set forth above, the City's Decision to deny SeaPack's Request should be reversed. I enclose the City's filing fee of$75.00. • Respectfully submitted, isktvi4N ;-- Laura N. Whitaker LNW:jcm Enclosure cc: Mr. Gregg Zimmerman Ms. Lesley Nishihira Jack Alkire, Esq. [09901-0001/SB993510.2301 - 12/17/99 ;y-. CIT1 . OF RENTON salL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • December 7, 1999 • • • Ms Laura Whitaker . . PerkiniCoie LLP 1201.Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 • SUBJECT: PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK CENTRE,FILE NO. LUA-99156,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Whitaker: • We have reviewed the submitted parking modification request (copy attached) pertaining to the SeaPack Center, and our evaluation and decision follow. • • Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging.Corporation, has requested a modification from section • 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations in order to provide less than the.minimum number of on-site parking spaces required-by code. The subject site is currently utilized by Seattle Packaging for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. As part of renovations proposed under the site plan application referenced above, modifications to parking areas are proposed. The applicant would like to provide 245 parking spaces for the site —65 spaces fewer than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application. • Section4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking • standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria • (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): • • . a. . Wll meet..the objectives and safety,•function, appearance, environmental • .. . . protection an0 maintainability intended•by the Code requirements; based upon ' sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and . Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and • • d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and • e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. • EXHIBIT A • • Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 • December 7, 1999 ' . . Page 2 • • Background • . • The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse,;manufacturing • • • • and supporting office space, including a.38,100 square foot building addition on the . • south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. • At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The • proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. • Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations require the provision of a specified number • of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space — requiring a total of • 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. Because the proposed number of stalls is 65 • • spaces fewer than the minimum number of spaces required by code, the applicant has included a parking modification request and parking study with the site plan application. • The approval of the parking modification will be required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking • agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis • • 1.). Will meet the objectives and safety,.function, appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was subm tted • with the site plan application. The parking analysis provided in the study indicates that the square footage for office use was incorporated into the amount of square footage listed under manufacturing use. According to the study, parking rates for manufacturing and warehouse uses typically account for 5 to 15 percent of those spaces as supporting office use. The completed center would have approximately 27,782 square feet of office • use, which equates to 7 percent of the building area. The applicant contends that the • 245 parking spaces to be provided on-site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing)and supporting operations (office). • • Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. For example, the required parking would be • Document2\cor s. • December 7, 1999 • • Page 3, • • • • • • based on a minimum of 1 tomaximum a m xlmum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area of manufacturing use, plus 1 space per 1,500 square feet of warehouse use. Based on • .the applicant's parking.analysis, the.building contains.approximately 150,971.square feet .. • of manufacturing space and 237,93.6 square feet of warehouse'space-requiring.a total: . of 31.0 parking.spaces to be provided on-site..:However, if evaluated under the strict • • interpretation of the parking regulations, separate parking for the office use of the site would also be necessary. Parking for office use is based on a minimum of 3 to a • • maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of area. This would result in a total of 365 required on-site parking spaces, or 120 spaces greater than the proposed amount. The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based • on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. The applicant has also stated that in the event of full employment, the use of the site would be at full capacity. Therefore, any future growth • that would generate the need for additional parking would necessitate the facility's • 'relocation to another site. • The code's on-site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts to 'surrounding properties. As demonstrated by the parking study submitted with the • 'application and regardless of the correct parking analysis, at full employment the • 'SeaPack Centre would utilize less than the 245 stalls proposed to be provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking • regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal • would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. However, any significant change such as growth in employment, introduction of outdoor fleet vehicles that would occupy parking spaces, or other, could create a situation in which insufficient on-site parking was available for this use. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. • The proposed parking satisfies code•requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and 'emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. Therefore, in this regard the 'proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. • 'The site is part of a larger property, which is currently under review.for subdivision into • •• . . • •. 'three lots This subdivision would result in individual property boundaries for the subject . site (proposed.parcel A),:as well as for the adjacent Boeing budding (proposed parcel B) • • 'and IKEA (proposed parcel C) Although the parking situation on the overall property is ,pre-existing, the subdivision of the property would require each lot to individually satisfy ;the parking requirements. Based on a parking analysis conducted with the proposed ;short plat, parcel B would provide 249 parking spaces (246 to 252 required) and parcel C would provide 725 parking spaces (382 required). The existing situation has not been found to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity and the parking provided would be adequate for the proposed renovations to parcel A. • However, future potential uses of the site, combined with the pending subdivision of the property, would be potentially injurious to other properties in the vicinity if made to absorb 'overflow parking. . • • Document2\cor • • . December 7, 199S • Page 4 • 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criteria number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. • As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. However, a change in the business operation or potential future tenants of the property may not have a similar employee count and would likely have the need for additional parking as required by code. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. • As stated under criteria number 2, the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the SeaPack Centre. However, in the event of a significant change in the business operation or if a future tenant occupies the property and requires additional parking, there may be • potential adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity resulting from overflow parking. Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- • site parking spaces. According to parking code requirements for manufacturing, warehouse and office uses, the proposal would have 120 spaces fewer than the amount required by code. It is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be • adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. However, there are no means for enforcing or guaranteeing that future uses of the site would not have a greater number of employees, or the need for the full amount of parking as required by.code for the building. Tnerefore the request for parking modification is not : . approved: . .. Other options for complying with the conditions of approval for the site plan might be available. The applicant could explore the establishment of cross parking agreements between parcels A, B and C in order to accommodate the 120 additional spaces. required for the SeaPack Centre. • • • • Document2\cor December 7, 1999 Page 5 . • Sincerely, 4e / *e(, Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator . Planning/Building/Public. Works Department cc: Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira • • • • • • • • • Document2lcor • • PERKINS COIE • LLn 1201 THIRD AVENUE,SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 • October 22, 1.999 • • • Lesley Nishihira Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Parking Modification Request Dear Lesley: • As described in the "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building"(October 18, 1999) prepared by The Transpo Group ("Transpo"), Seattle Packaging Corporation ("SeaPack") proposes to consolidate its packaging operations into an existing warehouse building ("Building") located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue . S.W. and S.W. 43`d Street in Renton. SeaPack's use of the Building will require its renovation to include manufacturing and office space in addition to the existing warehouse use. On-site surface parking will be provided, totaling 245 striped parking stalls. This letter is a request for modification of applicable City Code requirements • for minimum parking stall quantity. Request for Modification of Parking Stall Requirements As noted above, the SeaPack project includes 245 striped parking stalls. The • Parking Study notes that the.renovated Building requires a minimum of 310 parking. . stalls under City.Code. Therefore, the project contains 65 fewer stalls than required by Code. • • . City Code authorizes the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to authorize a modification from minimum/maximum parking requirements (RMC 4-4- 080(F)(10)d, e). Such modifications must be based on criteria set forth at RMC 4-9- 250(D)(2). The criteria and the bases for the project's conformance with them are set forth below. • • ` EXHIBIT B • [23487-0002/SB992950.240] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA ( f . ' 1 October 22, 1999 Page 2 1. . A specific reason makes the strict letter of the Code impractical. The Building renovation will entail alteration of an existing warehouse and • associated surface parking lot. Alterations necessary to meet the developer's program . requirements will result in removal of some stalls. For this reasons, the strict letter of the Code with respect to minimum parking requirements is impractical. . 2. The modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Code: The Code's on site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts on surrounding properties. As the Traffic Study demonstrates, at full employment the SeaPack project will utilize less than the 245 stalls provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the Code'. • In particular, the existing side contains 269 striped parking stalls: The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand • for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate . • demandthroughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the. Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:0.0 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity: As aresult, additional warehousing'and/or manufacturing' space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the.projected eiriploy ment 0 levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. 3! The modification: • a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, . appearance, environmental protection and maintainability • • • [23487-0002/SB992950.240J _ 10/22/99 { 1 . 1 October 22, 1999 Page 3 intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. c. [Will] conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. • e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. • Please see response to criterion 2, above. * * * * Thank you for your consideration of this modification request. Should you • require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. • V ry ply yours, Laura N. Whitaker vt� LNW:bs cc: Jack Alkire • Jay Pickering • • • • [23487-0002/SB992950.240) • 10/22/99 CITY F RENTON 4•V-77a,, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor • December 7, 1999 • Ms. Laura Whitaker Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 SUBJECT: PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST—SEAPACK CENTRE,FILE NO.LUA-99156,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Whitaker:. We have reviewed the submitted parking modification request (copy attached) pertaining to the SeaPack Center, and our evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has requested a modification from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations in order to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. The subject site is currently utilized by Seattle Packaging for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. As part of renovations proposed under the site plan application referenced above, modifications to parking areas re proposed. The applicant would like to provide 245 parking spaces for the site —65 spaces fewer than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space'of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer f December 7, 1999 Page 2 Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations require the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space— requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. Because the proposed number of stalls is 65 spaces fewer than the minimum number of spaces required by code, the applicant has included a parking modification request and parking study with the site plan application. The approval of the parking modification will be required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing.alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A parking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group,was submitted with the site plan application. The parking analysis provided in the study indicates that the square footage for office use was incorporated into the amount of square footage listed under manufacturing use. According to the study, parking rates for manufacturing and warehouse uses typically account for 5 to 15 percent of those spaces as supporting office use. The completed center would have approximately 27,782 square feet of office use,which equates to 7 percent of the building area. The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on-site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and supporting operations (office). Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. For example, the required parking would be Document2\cor • December 7, 1999 Page 3 based on a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area of manufacturing use, plus 1 space per 1,500 square feet of warehouse use. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total .of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. However, if evaluated under the strict interpretation of the parking regulations, separate parking for the office use of the site would also be necessary. Parking for office use is based on a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of area. This would result in a total of 365 required on-site parking spaces, or 120 spaces greater than the proposed amount. The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles, with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. The applicant has also stated that in the event of full employment, the use of the site would be at full capacity. Therefore, any future growth that would generate the need for additional parking would necessitate the facility's relocation to another site. The code's on-site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts to surrounding properties. As demonstrated by the parking study submitted with the application and regardless of the correct parking analysis, at full employment the SeaPack Centre would utilize less than the 245 stalls proposed to be provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. However, any significant change such as growth in employment, introduction of outdoor fleet vehicles that would occupy parking spaces, or other, could create a situation in which insufficient on-site parking was available for this use. 2.) 'Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site'would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. Therefore, in this regard the proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 'The site is part of a larger property, which is currently under"review for subdivision into three lots. This subdivision would result in individual property boundaries for the subject site(proposed parcel A), as well as for the adjacent Boeing building (proposed parcel B) and IKEA(proposed parcel C). Although the parking situation on the overall property is pre-existing, the subdivision of the property would require each lot to individually satisfy the parking requirements. Based on a parking analysis conducted with the proposed short plat, parcel B would provide 249 parking spaces (246 to 252 required) and parcel C would provide 725 parking spaces (382 required). 'The existing situation has not been found to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity and the parking provided would be adequate for the proposed renovations to parcel A. However, future potential uses of the site, combined with the pending subdivision of the property, would be potentially injurious to other properties in the vicinity if made to absorb overflow parking. Document2\cor December 7, 1999 Page 4 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criteria number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized at estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. However, a change in the business operation or potential future tenants of the property may not have a similar employee count and would likely have the need for additional parking as required by code. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criteria number 2, the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the SeaPack Centre. However, in the event of a significant change in the business operation or if a future tenant occupies the property and requires additional parking, there may be potential adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity resulting from overflow parking. Decision The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on- site parking spaces. According to parking code requirements for manufacturing, warehouse and office uses, the proposal would have 120 spaces fewer than the amount required by code. It is recognized that the proposed parking for the site would be adequate for the current intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. However, there are no means for enforcing or guaranteeing that future uses of the site would not have a greater number of employees, or the need for the full amount of parking as required by code for the building. Therefore the request for parking modification is not approved. Other options for complying with the conditions of approval for the site plan might be available. The applicant could explore the establishment of cross parking agreements between parcels A, B and C in order to accommodate the 120 additional spaces required for the SeaPack Centre. Document2\cor December 7, 1999 Page 5 Sincerely, • 4 eff 37',/,-(ee Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira Document2\cor PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE,SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888•FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 October 22, 1999 Lesley Nishihira Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Parking Modification Request Dear Lesley: As described in the "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building" (October 18, 1999) prepared by The Transpo Group ("Transpo"), Seattle Packaging Corporation ("SeaPack") proposes to consolidate its packaging operations into an existing warehouse building ("Building") located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street in Renton. SeaPack's use of the Building will require its renovation to include manufacturing and office space in addition to the existing warehouse use. On-site surface parking will be provided, totaling 245 striped parking stalls. This letter is.a request for modification of applicable City Code requirements for minimum parking stall quantity. • Request for Modification of Parking Stall Requirements As noted above, the SeaPack project includes 245 striped parking stalls. The Parking Study notes that the renovated Building requires a minimum of 310 parking stalls under City Code. Therefore, the project contains 65 fewer stalls than required by Code. City Code authorizes the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to authorize a modification from minimum/maximum parking requirements (RMC 4-4- 080(F)(10)d, e). Such modifications must be based on criteria set forth at RMC 4-9- 250(D)(2). The criteria and the bases for the project's conformance with them are set forth below. [23487-0002/SB992950.240] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA i • October 22, 1999 Page 2 1. A specific reason makes the strict letter of the Code impractical. The Building renovation will entail alteration of an existing warehouse and associated surface parking lot. Alterations necessary to meet the developer's program requirements will result in removal of some stalls. For this reasons, the strict letter of the Code with respect to minimum parking requirements is impractical. 2'. The modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Code. The Code's on site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts Ion surrounding properties. As the Traffic Study demonstrates, at full employment the SeaPack project will utilize less than the 245 stalls provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the Code. In particular, the existing side contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand..throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. 3. The modification: a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability [23487-0002/SB992950.240]__ 10/22/99 • October 22, 1999 Page 3 intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. c. [Will] conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Please see response to criterion 2, above. * * * * Thank you for your consideration of this modification request. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. V ry truly yours,// )/ & �/VV(/(i. Laura N. Whitaker LNW:bs cc: Jack Alkire Jay Pickering [23487-0002/SB992950.240] 10/22/99 _ : : jlda' .ii__ t`' tocfl^:t.�.� DA DATE. L,N rst-liff Cli/kN ji 1•De's CITY OF RENTON 'H 5.44iv Planning/Building/Public Works T MAivS0N MEMORANDUM DATE: November 29, 1999 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner(x7270) SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has requested a modification from section 4-4- 080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations in order to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. The subject site is currently utilized by Seattle Packaging for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. As part of renovations proposed under the site plan application referenced above, modifications to parking areas are proposed. The applicant would like to provide 245 parking spaces for the site—65 spaces fewer than the minimum number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas,which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations require the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJ ECTS\99- 156.In\pkg'mod.doc f CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: November 29, 1999 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner(x7270)v SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156,SA-A, ECF Summary of Request The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, has requested a modification from section 4-4- 080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations in order to provide less than the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by code. The subject site is currently utilized by Seattle Packaging for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. As part of renovations proposed under the site plan application referenced above, modifications to parking areas are proposed. The applicant would like to provide 245 parking spaces for the site—65 spaces fewer than the minimum,number required for manufacturing and warehouse space of this size. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual lcases provided that the modification meets the following criteria(pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250D2): a.. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e.l Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new warehouse, manufacturing and supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The property is located in the Medium Industrial (IM)zone and is currently developed with an existing warehouse type structure, along with supporting utilities, parking, and landscape improvements. The proposal includes revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. At present, a total of 269 parking spaces exist within the boundaries of the site. The proposed renovations would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would create 47 new stalls on the north side of the building, resulting in a new total of 245 on-site parking spaces. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations require the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\99- 156.In\pkgmod.doc building contains approximately 150,971 square feet of manufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. Because the proposed number of stalls is 65 spaces fewer than the minimum number of spaces required by code, the applicant has included a parking modification request and parking study with the site plan application. The approval of the parking modification will be required as a condition of approval for the proposed Isite plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared parking agreements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Aparking study for the SeaPack Centre, prepared by the Transpo Group, was submitted with the site plan application. The parking analysis provided in the study indicates that the square footage for office use was incorporated into the amount of square footage listed under manufacturing use. According to the study, parking rates for manufacturing and warehouse uses typically account for 5 to 15 percent of those spaces as supporting office use. The completed center would have approximately 27,782 square feet of office use,which equates to 7 percent of the building area. The applicant contends that the 245 parking spaces to be provided on-site would be sufficient for both primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing)and supporting operations (office). Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires a specified number of parking spaces based on the specific use of the site. For example, the required parking would be based on a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area of manufacturing use, plus 1 space per 1,500 square feet of warehouse use. Based on the applicant's parking analysis,the building contains approximately 150,971 square feet oflmanufacturing space and 237,936 square feet of warehouse space—requiring a total of 310 parking spaces to be provided on-site. However, if evaluated under the strict interpretation of the parking regulations,separate parking for the office use of the site would also be necessary. Parking for office use is based on a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of area. This would result in a total of 365 required on-site parking spaces, or 120 spaces greater than the proposed amount. The parking study also provides a breakdown of the parking demand for the site based on existing and future employment levels. The study concludes that the peak parking demand for the site is currently 161 vehicles,with a future peak parking demand estimated at 229 vehicles. Therefore, on typical weekdays for the projected employment level of the building, only 93 to 94 percent of the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided would be utilized. The applicant has also stated that in the event of full employment, the use of the site would be at full capacity. Therefore, any future growth that would generate the need for additional parking would necessitate the facility's relocation to another site. The code's on-site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts to surrounding properties. As demonstrated by the parking study submitted with the application and regardless of the correct parking analysis, at full employment the SeaPack Centre would utilize less than the 245 stalls proposed to be provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the use of the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\99-156.ln\pkgmod.doc 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, depth, drive aisles, and emergency access. Based on the applicant's parking study, the site would provide adequate parking for the intended use of the property. Therefore, in this regard the proposal would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The site is part of a larger property, which is currently under review for subdivision into three lots. This subdivision would result in individual property boundaries for the subject site(proposed parcel A), as well as for the adjacent Boeing building (proposed parcel B) and IKEA(proposed parcel C). Although the parking situation on the overall pro erty is ,cy pare-existing, the subdivision of the property would require each lot to individual sate e parking requirements. Based on a parking analysis conducted with the proposed short plat, parcel B would provide 249 parking spaces (246 to 252 required)and parcel C would provide 725 parking spaces (382 required). The existing situation has not been found to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity and the parking provided would be adequate for the proposed renovations to parcel A. However,future potential uses of the site, combined with the pending subdivision of the property,would be potentially injurious to other properties in the vicinity if made to absorb overflow parking. 3.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criteria number one. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's parking study, the parking proposed would be underutilized ate estimated full employment levels for the building. Therefore, the 245 parking stalls proposed to be provided are justified for the use and situation at the SeaPack Centre. However, potential future tenants of the property may not have a similar employee count and would likely have the need for additional parking as required by code. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criteria number 2,the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the SeaPack Centre. However, in the event a future tenant occupies the property and requires additional parking, there may be potential adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity resulting from overflow parking. Recommendation The proposed renovations to be performed by Seattle Packaging would result in 245 on-site parking spaces. According to parking code requirements for manufacturing, warehouse and office uses, the proposal would have 120 spaces fewer than the amount required by code. Based on the parking study provided by the applicant, staff recognizes that the proposed parking for the site would'be adequate for the intended use of the property by the SeaPack Centre. However, there are no means for enforcing or guaranteeing that future uses of the site would not have a greater number of employees, or the need for the full amount of parking as required by code for the building. In order to comply with the conditions of approval for the site plan, the applicant should establish cross parking agreements between parcels A, B and C. This would allow for IKEA's 382 spaces in excess of code requirements to accommodate the 120 additional spaces required for the SeaPack Centre. cc: Jennifer Henning H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\99-156.1n\pkgmod.doc - .3 PARKING STUDY for SeaPack Centre Building . Renton, WA Prepared for: Seattle Packaging Corporation and • Mithun Partners October 18, 1999 Prepared by.' The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 (425) 821-3665 FAX: (425) 825-8434 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Overview and Study Purpose 1 Study Results 1 EXISTING BUILDING 2 • Description _ 2 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 2 Conclusion 2 PROJECT PROPOSAL 3 Description 3 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 3 Parking Demand for the Building 4 Conclusion 4 TRUCK IMPACTS 5 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview and Study Purpose This study documents the parking impacts of the proposal SeaPackeCentre project. Both employee parking impacts and impacts to truck delivery vehicles are identified. The purpose of the parking study is to evaluate the parking requirements of the existing site and to evaluate the impacts of the proposed project,which includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building("Building")which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot(gsf)structure,3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur,and 38,100 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas,the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nsf)of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. The Building is located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43`d Street in Renton. This report is separated into three distinct areas. The first identifies the parking requirements of the existing site, which contains a 363,150 nsf warehouse. The second evaluates the parking requirements of the proposed Building. The third area evaluates the project's impact to truck deliveries and access. The formal Land Use submittal,which will include a copy of the existing site plan and the proposed Building plan, is currently scheduled for October 25, 1999. Study Results Parking Impacts of Existing Site. The parking study demonstrates that the existing parking supply of 269 striped stalls exceeds the City's parking code requirement of 242 stalls for the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. Parking'Impacts of the Proposal. The future proposed parking supply of 245 stalls is 65 stalls less than the City's parking code requirement of 310 stalls for the expanded Building, which would contain warehouse and manufacturing operations. As such, a modification to the City's parking code requirement is requested such that parking on the site only be provided to accommodate the projected future employee parking demands of the proposed SeaPack Centre Building. Truck Impacts. Parking stalls are not recommended in directly line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side of the Building so that the entire 104-foot depth can be used for truck maneuvering. M.'I99199295IWPIREPORT3.DOC 0 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 1 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 . EXISTING BUILDING Description The existing building, which contains 363,150 net square feet (nsf) of area, will be used by Seattle Packaging Corporation to consolidate some of its manufacturing and warehousing operations. Employees and trucks are expected to use the existing driveways for access to and from the site. The existing parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls, which includes stalls on the north side of the Building in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. City of Renton Parking Code Requirements Section 4-4-080 (Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations) of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parking requirements for the existing building. The City's parking requirements for warehouse space is 1 staff for every 1,500 nsf of building area. Since the existing building has 363,150 nsf, a total of 242 parking stalls are required. , Conclusion The existing site parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls. The use of the existing building as a warehouse would require a minimum of 242 parking stalls according to City Code. Since the existing parking supply exceeds the City's minimum requirement of 242 stalls, no additional parking would be required to serve the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. M:199199295WWPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc.1999 Page 2 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 PROJECT PROPOSAL Description The proposal includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building ("Building") which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot (gsf) structure, 3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur, and 38,100 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas, the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nsf) of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. The parking on the north side of the Building includes spaces in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. City of Renton Parking Code Requirements • Section 4-4-080 of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parking requirements for the Seapack Centre proposal. The table shown below summarizes the parking requirements of the site based on City code and the planned use of the building. Note that the net square footage (nsf) of the manufacturing space includes 27,782 nsf of office space (about 7 percent of the total nsf of the Building), which would support both the manufacturing the warehousing operations. Parking rates for manufacturing and warehousing uses typically allow for about 5 to 15 percent of the total building space to be used by ancillary office uses to support the primary operations. Since the 7 percent office space for the Building falls at the lower end of this range, the parking required to support the primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and the supporting operation (office) would be sufficient to accommodate both. Use Size(nsf) City Code Requirement No.Stalls Required Manufacturing* 150,971 nsf 1 stall per 1,000 nsf 151 Warehousing 237,936 nsf 1 stall per 1,500 nsf 159 Total 388,907 nsf 310 Includes 27,782 nsf of office space to support the manufacturing and warehousing operations,which is 7%of total nsf. According to City Code,the SeaPack Centre proposal would be required to provide 310 parking stalls to serve the Building's manufacturing and warehousing uses, which is 65 more than proposed. Approval of the proposal, then, will require a parking modification. M:t99199295\WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc.1999 Page 3 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 Parking Demand for the Building To estimate the parking demand of the proposal, the parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were determined separately. This was done for both the existing employment levels and the future projected employment of the Building at full buildout. Note also that about seven percent of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. Existing employment levels reflect the use of the Building in the year 2000. Future buildout of the project would occur after about ten years, and would result in maximum employment levels for the Building. Existing Employment. The existing parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses was determined based on the current employment levels of each use, as provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. Using the existing employment data, the hourly parking demands were determined for each use based on the various shifts and support staff serving them. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 161 vehicles. Future Employment. Future employment levels were estimated according to projections provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. They expect 40 percent growth in manufacturing and 75 percent growth in warehousing. Using these future employment projections, the hourly parking demand for each use was determined. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 229 vehicles. Conclusion The existing site contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. c M:1991992951WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 4 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 TRUCK IMPACTS Section 4-4-080-J4 of the City of Renton Land Use Code identifies a minimum 100-foot back-out distance for trucks at dock-in loadings. The current distance from the west edge of the existing building to the west property line is 104 feet,which exceeds the City's requirement for back-out distance. However,currently parking stalls are striped along the property line such that less than 90 feet of back-out distance is available for delivery truck maneuvering. As a result,delivery trucks that currently use the loading docks on the west side of the existing building are not in conformance with current City Code. With the project proposal,the existing loading docks on the west side of the Building would remain,and six additional double-wide dock doors are proposed. Seattle Packaging uses the following three types of trucks or truck/trailer combinations for deliveries: 1. Large combinations with a 16-foot truck and 48-foot trailer(64-feet total). 2. Medium size combinations with a 16-foot truck and 32-foot trailer(48-feet total). 3. Small box truck with a 12-foot truck and 28-foot trailer(40-feet total). Due to the need for additional parking stalls on the site to accommodate future employment levels,additional parking stalls were initially identified along some of the area on the west site property line adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. With standard 20-foot long parking stalls,about 84 feet of depth(104 feet existing less 20-foot long parking stall)would be available for truck maneuvering at those dock doors directly in-line with the parking stalls along the west property line. Based on typical turning radii of 41 to 45 feet for a WB-50 truck(50 feet in total length),the entire 104 feet of existing depth would be needed to accommodate back-in and pull-out truck maneuvers. As such,it is recommended that the existing parking stalls be removed and no additional parking stalls allowed in directly line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side of the Building so that the entire 104-foot depth can be used for truck maneuvering. • • • • M:1991992951WPIREPORT3DOC. ©The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 1999 Page 5 • • On the 3-14 day of DecevAloQr . , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing -P-e_p dtna l�e_u sla r, documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • •�� 1 ni�l<�•Yt�� Mum Pa� v�e15 3-ac k R 1kI re— Sea-t-k-I e Pas_kk%Ai Co Ire • • • • • • (Signature of.Sender) Stu -vek- 1& • Se.cn-cr • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S01-,aV.a • S `' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fop—he uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. lDated: 1 Z -1—'2--/i� �� - ('i)-y_1- ,_�:�... « ,r Notary Publi in and_for the State of ington MOHIFF RIlYM KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) MYAPPCINTME► TEXPIRES:6-29-03 STAR OF vvASHINGTON My appointment expires: COI1tSIC3�I EXPIRES Project Number: LUP% . 9.9 , IS(p • NOTARY.DOC l ii r , REPORT City of h.ton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: November 30, 1999 Project Name: SeaPack Centre Applicant: Seattle Packing Corporation Owner: Pacific NW Group A File Number: LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal is a parking modification request to provide parking below the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA-99- 103,SHPL-A), which is currently under review with the City. Project Location: 1000 SW 43rd Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 371,070 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 41,940 sf Site Area: 668,500 sf(15 acres) Total Building Area SF: 413,010 sf NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL PLAN 5, Q :/;,..,_ Lei 0 A T / t {f Ei—) ___,,,_1 I' III- 7 N - +O T•.Y ie -- `iF• .. .. '•S. 1 Y �� tV '` MOLL, BUS Gt •\ , G E N T L E/ rig '. "1 t 1114 o u, L l T \A �b 1~� Sri e '' q'yJ//' I 'I Project Location Map — siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr :31 Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30,.1999 Page 2 of 10 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The site is currently occupied by Seattle Packaging and used for the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. The proposal would result in the construction of supporting office space, including a 38,100 square foot building addition on the south side of the structure and a 3,840 square foot infill of the railroad spur in the center of the building. The proposal also includes the removal of approximately 11,700 square feet of existing landscape areas, including 42 trees, and the replacement of 12,100 square feet of new landscaping throughout the site. In addition, revisions to existing parking areas are proposed'which would result in a decreased number of parking stalls than the amount that currently exists. The applicant has included a parking modification request with the land use application. The proposed renovations to the SeaPack Centre are one of three upgrade phases planned for the property. Tenant improvements to the interior of the warehouse portion of the building were completed in September of 1999. Upgrades to the manufacturing and production areas are anticipated to begin in the spring of next year. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA- 99-103,SlkPL-A), which is currently under review with the City. The proposed site plan is generally consistent with the short plat plan. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The subject site is generally flat with slopes of less than 1%. Currently, the site is developed with an existing warehouse structure, along with associated parking, landscape, and utility improvements. The proposal involves modifications to landscape areas, including the removal of approximately 11,700 square feet of existing landscaping (approximately 42 deciduous and evergreen trees at 6-inch to 8-inch caliper). These areas will be replaced with approximately 12,100 square feet of new landscaping (64 trees) throughout the site. The project construction would require minimal grade and fill activities. The use of 3,000 cubic yards of soil as pre-load would be necessary to prepare the south portion of the site for the weight of the new building addition. The pre-load would be removed after the site preparation is completed. A,Geotechnical Engineering Study and subsequent follow up letters, prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc., were submitted with the land use application. According to the reports, the site is immediately underlain with approximately 1 to 2 feet of dense, man-placed structural fill over native soil deposits. The native soils consist of interbedded, unconsolidated, flood plain deposits with variations of clay, silt, sand and peat. The fine- grained silts and clays range from very soft to medium stiff, while the granular silty sands rang from loose to medium dense. The report states that the proposed structure could be siterc 1 0 1. City,of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envirom _"31 Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 3 of 10 supported on shallow, spread and continuous footings provided specific recommendations regarding site preparation and foundation design are complied with. In order to mitigate potential erosion impacts on the site, staff will recommend the applicant be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report submitted with the application. In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation during the clearing, grading, and construction of the site, the applicant will be required to implement temporary erosion/sedimentation control measures as required by RMC section 4-4-030C. The applicant has submitted a construction mitigation plan, which includes the use of a temporary interceptor dike and swale, check dams, sediment traps, storm drain inlet protections, tire wash at construction entrances, and the periodic watering of the site to reduce dust impacts. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report, prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. Policy Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance (2) Water Impacts: The proposed development would not significantly alter the existing amount of impervious surface on the site, which is approximately 90%. The site is located near Springbrook Creek, but the proposed area of construction is outside of the 200-foot boundary regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. There are existing drainage facilities located on the site. No modifications to site drainage are included with the proposal. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Fire Impacts: The proposal would result in 51,500 gross square feet of new construction within the City limits. The new portions of the building would potentially generate the need for emergency services, which will impact the City's Fire Department. In order to offset the impacts associated with new development, all construction is subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee. The fee is based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction area. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $26,780.00 ($0.52 x 51,500 sf= $26,780.00). The Fire Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. (4) Transportation Impacts: The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and is therefore subject to the City's Traffic Mitigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of$75 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $11,580.00 ($75.00 x 154.4 trips = $11,580.00)The Traffic Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs , ,,91 Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 4 of 10 Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 da A eal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report, prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The applicant shall paythe appropriate Fire Miti Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52per square foot of PP 9 q q new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to;the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination., Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The applicant will need to revise the site plan in order to provide a minimum drive aisle width of 24 feet along the south side of the building. This revision may also require modifications to the proposed landscape plan (e.g., reduction in additional width proposed) in order to satisfy the requirement. The revised site plan (and landscape plans, if necessary)will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A separate sign permit application is required for any proposed signage for the project. 3. The applicant will be required to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit if any construction work or site modifications occur within the designated 200-foot Shoreline Master Program boundary of Springbrook Creek. 4. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan so that it accurately reflects the dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. For example, the site plan shows a total site area of 15,250 square feet greater than the area indicated on the short plat survey. There are also discrepancies between the dimensions of the property boundaries. These revisions will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be dependent upon any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. 5. The site plan will need to indicate which stalls are proposed to be compact in size. This revision will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs , al Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE, LUA-99-156,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 5 of 10 Building 1. The proposal is required to comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 gpm. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Existing hydrants are allowed to satisfy this requirement, provided they are retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways must have a minimum width of 20 feet with an outside turning radius of 45 feet and 25 feet on the inside. 4. A list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on-site must be provided. 5. The Renton Fire Department does not support variances to provide less than the required parking per code. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The project is not proposing any additional sewer connections outside the building, so no sewer permits will be required. The site has previously paid waste water (SDC)fees. Plan Review— Drainage 1. The project will not increase the on-site impervious surface, so no permit or System Development Charges for storm water will be required. Plan Review—Water 1. As proposed, the project will not require any additional water main or fire hydrants. However, all existing hydrants must be retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings pursuant to Fire Department requirement's. The site has previously paid water (SDC)fees. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The site has existing street improvements (curb, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights) on the street frontages of Oakesdale Ave SW, SW 43rd St, and SW 41st St. If new driveways are installed, they must satisfy current city codes and standards. Parks 1. All landscape areas outside property lines are to be maintained by the applicant. Police 1. The proposal would generate an estimated 32.67 additional CFS annually. King County Waste Water Treatment Division 1. Construction drawings for the project should be submitted to Eric Davison in the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, MS KSC-NR-0500, for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Eric can be reached at (206) 684-1707. 2. Please contact Eric Davison at (206) 684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing any construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site during construction. 3. King County has a permanent easement for the trunk sewer line adjacent to the site. Prior to project approval, King County must be guaranteed the right to maintain and repair the sewer line. In the event that the line must be relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way, MS KSC-NR-0600, at the address above, or at (206) 296-7804, to discuss the matter. 4. The applicant must provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland at (206) 296-7804 to discuss the matter. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environi al Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE, LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 6 of 10 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Existing Site Plan (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Proposed Site Plan (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3-5, Proposed Floor Plans (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 6, Existing Building Elevations (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 7-8, Proposed Building Elevations (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 9-12, Landscape Plans (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 13, Grading, Drainage and Utilities Plan (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 14, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received November 4, 1999). Exhibit No. 10:Drawing No. 15, Existing Parking Detail (Received November 4, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1., Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Employment Area — Valley (EAV) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. The existing use of the site as a manufacturing facility, and, therefore, the proposed expansion of the facility, is consistent with the EAV designation. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM) on the City's Zoning Map. Manufacturing and warehouse facilities are considered a primary permitted use in this zone. Office uses are also allowed when associated with a primary permitted use on the site. The review of the proposed site plan was based on the proposed boundaries of the site as presented in the recent short plat application for the property (file no. LUA-99-103, SHPL-A). The site plan is generally consistent with the short plat plan, with the exception of some minor discrepancies regarding total site area and property dimensions. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan so that it accurately reflects the dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. These revisions will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be dependent upon any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. The proposal's compliance with the development standards of the IM zone is discussed below. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr _ ,91 Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE] LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 7 of 10 Building Limitations: The IM zone does not restrict building height or lot coverage by buildings. The proposed addition would consist of two-stories, totaling 36 feet in height. The project would also result in a lot coverage by buildings of 59% of the site's area. Setbacks: The IM zone requires a minimum setback of 20 feet from arterial street frontages, 15 feet from all other streets, and no setbacks for rear or interior side yards. The proposed addition to the south side of the building would maintain a setback of 42 feet from the site's SW 43rd street frontage. No modifications are proposed which would alter the existing setbacks along the site's west, north and east property lines. Landscaping: The proposal includes modifications to the landscape areas along the site's SW 43rd street frontage, as well as throughout the parking area. These modifications would result in a net increase of 593 square feet of landscape area. Currently, the site has existing landscape width of 10 feet along the property's west and north street frontages and 15 feet along the south street frontage. The IM zone requires a minimum landscape width of 15 feet along street frontages and 20 feet along arterial street frontages (in this case SW 43rd Street). Although the existing landscaping along all three of the site's street frontages is currently nonconforming, the scope of the project would not require these areas to be brought into compliance. The applicant is proposing alterations to the landscaped setback on SW 43rd Street, including the creation of a pedestrian connection to the building's main entrance and an increase of the existing landscape width to 20 feet. However, as indicated on the site plan, the alteration of this area would reduce the drive aisle on the south side of the site to a substandard width (22 feet). This issue is discussed further under the evaluation of vehicle and pedestrian circulation on the site (criteria no. 6). Parking: The parking regulations require a minimum number of parking spaces to be provided on-site depending on the specific use of the property. The applicant has provided a parking analysis, which indicates 310 parking spaces would be required based on the city's parking requirements for warehouse and manufacturing uses. Currently, the site has 269 existing parking stalls. The proposed addition would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the building and would re-create 47 new stalls to be distributed around the perimeter of the building, for a net decrease of 19 parking spaces. The 245 parking spaces proposed are 65 spaces less than the required amount per code. With the land use application, the applicant has provided a modification request for the proposed number of stalls. The approval of the site plan will be conditioned upon the Department Administrator's approval of the modification request. In the event the request is not approved, the applicant will be required to satisfy the parking regulations by either revising the site plan or establishing alternatives to meet the requirements (e.g., shared or off-site parking arrangements). The new parking stalls appear to satisfy the minimum requirements for stall dimensions. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the site plan will need to be revised to indicate on the plan the proposed stalls that are compact in size. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed addition will not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. Any potential impacts to surrounding properties will be minimal considering the site is currently fully developed with associated parking, landscaping and utilities. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project to adjacent properties. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs _ ,.al Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE, LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 8 of 10 The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. Springbrook Creek is located within 200 feet of the site's northwest corner. However, none of the proposed work would be located within this boundary. As indicated in the applicant's construction mitigation description, best management practices will be used to reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts to the site. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow an existing manufacturing facility to expand in its current location. The expansion of the facility is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. 6., Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposal includes revisions to the parking areas on the site and includes modifications to circulation on the south side of the property. In addition to the alteration of the vehicle parking and circulation in this area of the site, the project would create a pedestrian connection from the sidewalk on SW 43rd Street to the main entrance of the building. Although the revised parking areas satisfy the minimum stall dimensions required, the proposed drive aisle along the south side of the building is substandard at a width of 22 feet. Ninety-degree parking stalls require a minimum aisle width of 24 feet in order to provide adequate back out distance. Although the applicant is proposing an increase to the landscape width on SW 43rd Street, the scope of the project would not require the existing landscaping to be brought into compliance with the required 20 foot width. In order to satisfy the drive aisle requirement, the applicant will need to revise the site plan to provide a minimum width of 24 feet along the south side of the building. This revision may also require modifications to the proposed landscape plan (e.g., reduction in additional width proposed) in order to satisfy this requirement. The proposal also includes the creation of 6 new loading dock doors on the west side of the building and the elimination of 10 loading dock doors on the north side of the building. The parking and loading regulations require a minimum back out distance of 100 feet for dock high loading doors. The proposed site plan indicates the elimination of existing parking stalls along the west property line, as well as the resulting 104-foot back out distance that would be provided for the new loading areas. As indicated on the building elevations and site plan for the project, the dock bumpers will be removed from the 10 dock doors on the north side of th'e building and parking spaces will be created in the former loading areas. It is necessary for the doors to remain in order to provide proper ventilation for the building. In order to ensure the safety of the parking stalls proposed in the former loading areas, staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the dock doors be sufficiently decommissioned prior to the final inspection of the building permit. The project site also requires the use of common access areas with the adjacent building located on proposed Parcel B of the PNW Group A Short Plat (file no. LUA-99-103, SHPL-A). Cross access agreements between these parcels will be required as a condition of approval for the short plat. In the event the short plat is not recorded, the subject proposal would still be in compliance with the IM development standards as well as the parking and the loading regulations. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed addition is sufficiently designed and setback from property lines to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building and the site. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; It is anticipated that minimal noise and odor impacts would result from the initial construction of the site. These short-term impacts would be mitigated by the applicant's construction siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environ al Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 9 of 10 mitigation plan, which includes limiting the hours of construction to 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise impacts associated with increased traffic and activities resulting from the completed expansion would not increase significantly above existing conditions. 9., Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development. In order to compensate for the increased demand on public services resulting from the completed project, the applicant will be required to pay Fire and Traffic Mitigation fees as imposed by the Environmental Review Committee. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposal will serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an existing development. XX , Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file , containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied',with. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 10. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area—Valley(EAV). 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Medium Industrial (IM) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include developed industrial and property, zoned IM on the north, east, and south sides of the property. Office and commercially developed property, zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) is located on the west side of the site. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area — Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Medium Industrial (IM). siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environ. - . al Review Committee Staff Report SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Page 10 of 10 F. Decision The Site Plan for the SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan to accurately reflect the dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. This revision will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be subject to any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. 2. Th'e applicant shall obtain approval for the requested parking modification to allow fewer parking spaces than required by code. In the event the modification is not approved, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to comply with the parking regulations, or establish an alternative means for the provision of the necessary spaces (e.g., off-site or shared parking arrangements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall decommission the loading dock doors on the north side of the building prior to the final inspection of the building permit. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: /AL/21-- a Hanson,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this:6th day of December, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Pacific NW Group A(owner) do Trammel Crow 5601 6th Avenue South Seattle,WA 98108 Seattle Packing Corporation (applicant) Jack Alkire 3701 South Norfolk Seattle,WA 98118 Mithun Partners, Inc.(contact) Jay Pickering 414 Olive Way#500 Seattle,WA 98101 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of December, 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C.Duffy,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal' Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. siterc • • \ � SW.N.1 STREET T.MITT Ma MI 111 Mg `cam --rA-F ..Trt --y�ii> Mee WMarcie.. _/• — :H' f Hi z—.1Fif-I -- Hf- ,i-I+I-I f i-H I-I-I Hi.1-1 1� �J 1 I I I-I _ (� �_ ^ __ 1 1 YITHVN .a..i Y Q (). /SO lea *�:. /1 w D .x r,�' 1� a le la 17 le (lo) o I I ....•...... I S �I{7� Y T�}IIa 1I, 1 rx N¢...4A—f ,I. "'•E 1 1 1 I I I I I Ipb 1 1 1©7©..9 x ♦pV l ......... •N..o.....•. o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I .. 1I IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII II O _-�_-I-__1-__I_-I-__1-__I 1-1_ —__-1_�-�1_�._1-J—L__J_J J I° IIIIIIIII 1111111111 � I I II II II II II I I I II II II II II I1 I1 I L _—O-TY�t'-Tl- --t�-l�- ----1—L-L 1—T"TY�T'-T�—O �,� 0 O 0 1 1 I I 1 y •'•- ' IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII �' o � "'l f-1—t tl-f-t-tt-----1 -hi—t-t-i—f-fii— � ® w o 0 M M Ill IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIlI� a ex.rem ra--. :!a � _ o_ 1—L__!_J-1_1—1-1_____—1-1—_J_4—L_--L-1--L__l—4—D/�r� x�JcP{T;� „�K.xPile , I 1.414.145. �°.rt.. ' ' I 1 I I I 1 1 I I / I I I I I I I I I '4111 I �'� IIIIII II II1L LIL-—I----I -—I----I---L- I I I-1—I I � Pi IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII Imo . . a .x�l ° i-t - i-t t- 1-t f— i- t -i-t -i�(°—, w _ I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 V J T•e IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII `'" O --J—J—I.__L 1—L__I_1-1____1_L__L—1_L_-1_.-I i. __L-_J— a . O IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII ' �T EXISTING SITE PLAN NOTE* o I • I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 TOTAL EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 666.500 GSF. O —0_ I I - I I I- I I— - °—--— I _ - I I - I -9 -I I 1 I�I-1 ` °° rt[Am.w• FIRST FLOORIE%ISTINGI I71.070 GSF. I it--IY -Ih---11'-1. -}I--I —}I- YII—YII- 'YII— e SECOND FLOORIE%ISTINGI 0 GSP. 1 "- -_ TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING BUILDING 571070 GSF. I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I PERCENTAGE OFLA LOT COVERAGE 56F 11 I I I I I 1 1 III 1 1 1 I 1 I I s TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPES AREA 65.576 GSF 1 _I- I TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS AREA 605.024 GSF rre lrt.nr.oa I I. I TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA 255654 GSF \ I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED x' I EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT 17•0' 'a I xe�--I o 1-1-t -I I I -t-1--t------f l- -I--1-I -I---1-t• -1---1 _ BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE � ' ARTERIAL STREETS 10' ' m=IbJP 7 1 OO y OTHER STREETS 15' u EXISTING BUILDING SETBACKS OS'FRONT 1 "� I I 11 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I .1 N 5'SIDE OW REAR '�e'' •°+A:1.•ot .. I 0 _`7_�1__L_IJ—L__I-1_1- ° _1-y__L_1—L_�_J—L _ - _JJ-0 I g "" III I III II IIIIIIIIII eXISTING PARKING ANALYST@ - 1• I .er I 1 I 1 I _I - 1 1 1 I I I I - yll I 1 1 I 1 l I I 1 V ISTANDARD STALLS 160 COMPACT STALLS 0 ;�- ) -4- -IY--1---- -1-yI-I-l_Lf_F"- Y - -Y- y OACCESSIBLE STALLS 0 i I TOTAL STALLS 160 IIIIIIIIII � 1111111111 I IX m lM.A.la.er..o[-��i . I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I PLAN Emt, nry N cAK�.� o- � — �_ �__. __ _ I-0 I ��� 2 � f I I .I I� II i1111I II �-� II�III I I IJI Itl.l 11 I IIII oom,{* w�,t I • ' 4) (1) 7 e m D V 5• 44 EXISTINO GROUND FLOOR&SITE PLAN 'O >'�I 1-[ 1 .,, / 1 �r • —'— --' -4tt t— 1- III— —— A1.0 SW.HSeE STREET ---__—__—__—_ NOT FC11 CONSTRUCT— O STRUCTKXI—w.--.. SW♦W STREET Lj . Y \ ..fl ° T p °.-4. o p p:Q p p gy p p Q p Q Q p p ® F ©" Q • i i� i�yi i 1 i 1 m i i lanai I III I I I Ilf=(" _1 i i LI �. _ I.. r�q. . : _ 1 •. " ii ii ii I !E ! I 1111 i11i 11111 i111 i iiii iiii iiiii iiii �; ia ; -1 i i i i i i i ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i -. : i o 0 i. o D-1--T----i---i-- --1---1--�---i------=-T-t--1--t--1----t--1---1--T -*- --© -0 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 4. .4 III III I I I I I I I I I Z 0 I ' Wo A -i--+--1---1-- --i---1--+--i--------±---+-1--+---i----+--1---i--+--.--•t-----0 0 � � iiii iiii iiiii iiii / U 2 Ar I i i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111I °19 IIII v6.0 a i ;9 n:1 i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I I > . >_ .: : I III s ..� E j :11r _``':.ir> f©1 1 I I I I I I I I I I " `"'� U ro I J—. ""q I I I I I I I I 1 i i i I I `'< vE r lyd.� i e I 7 Px —T I I I I I I I I I I I >��`"ag<_?�� 4 ' � a-.__. a--+__j___i_. --i---j_-+--i-- ---=+--+--a—+--i-----+--i-- 4_+- �a 3, i--o W al o • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "` ! (/)v) o i i i i I ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i : 1 ! o-'mA- -11--_L-_i--i-- --I---L-1--1--------L-i- l___1 1---L-J---L-L- ,1 9 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NOTES i I I I 1 i i i i I i I I i I I I I I i -0/ — p TOTAL EKI5TIN0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 665500 GSF I ' 6 ° I N I Gov I 1 1 11 1 I I I I I I I I I 5 ,,--,---.-- FIRST FLOORIEKISTING AND PROPOSED)301.060 GSF. i E Q—i mu�0�ovem I I 9° I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I SECOND FLOORIPRDPoSEDI 1E050 GSF. - TOTAL PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 415.010 GSF. o ! I --—— T PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE SDK T--i---i-- --i--'1—'T--i- - --t--E--i-T--i----T._1_-.-_T- _--r- - TOTAL SOUARE FOOTAGE LANDSCAPED AREA 64.16D GSF. 1111 yy: TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT AREA 210•567 OSF. $p 4 ners 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I j'9I°I Q .ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED II I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I r §I \ PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 3e•-e• i BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED BY CODE •IQ i C' _—_—_1--I-- I _—i—.1__ _.�_—.1—_+-�_-- _ —_�.-i_--1—_+--1_---+_-1_-_1-_.+•- i ALLOWED STREETS 10 Ll' I l T OTHER STREETS la• D PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS 11'FRONT I u i ..— NW SIDE t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' Y i _ D0 REAR I I lull 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I ! = 1 I7,771. o----- j—L--L--I---L- .J---L_1_4_9 --L---._.1__-L-J.___L-J---L_L : k_-o `6 PROPOSED PARKING ANALYSIS V : I I I 1 1 1 i 1 i I I I� 1 I 1 ' I REFER TO PARKING STUDY 5T THE TRANSPO GROUP ' - -- STANDARD-STALLS 201 I I ggill I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 •� COMPACT STALLS REF) 35 � 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 6 I I 1 . I TOTAL STALLS US A LEGENQ � , t` 1 AREA O NOW I I I I I I I >: I I I I I J F PARKING STALL S 0 y ui5 'I I ° I I I I I �^ I _1. r.•dn:eT I ARN EA OP [W LANDSCAPING C IHG 16 r, ' PROPO SED 9TE PLAN 9 �r" .:. AREA OF NEW INTERIOR WORK �°'y 0 � � � -- -�I f.•.-�• 6EK15TING BUILDING 1 r 'III F_Rl OPI 1 I�� 1� [-j I I • \���, NO PARKING AREAI n•.R '`�� V`y ` u f 1^' 1 1 1 1 1 ., Q I I ICI II tO s1 .A� •�Y ni � ' ''ti'a•.11.1 .' �9dR. el —�wi"-- - .A. — —. {SR TP51�TJ���� =MSN PROPOSED ROOF PLAN&SITE PLAN d WNW -•�-� N1., WNW O 0 6 0 U 0 0 0..0,� ,la 1a.,.co 0 7 16 e O D 11 •0 • R...� -------------- --- ---- -- ---- ------------ ------------- - .. SW.13rd STREET ... • .• . _ r.C411 M • 6.'0 U 41:".::"' . . Dig. • All TII,N /::::r 7... . . • I-600-424-5555 . , I //.";.;3.4.., •,,$ ,,:.^,.. ,...„,..,_ ..... :: FB.;:::-.. 1,.11,,,,,.., ,..,,,,,.---r /Z:7'.: iF,..;•"..:.--f. F,..,I F 1*-40* .epsewase Nap pm, .....•••••.1 • "•" ...' 7'.;1:'•••"‘ . /FEW r 4 Z I i /1..m..,m... ••••••••• r------7___________________7____=_,,,.,r,„7_.:.._ ,, . 7 i7,..„:„.• . ' \• 064.81 ., SUM Ps..Of • 11011111111•31.11.•II .1,11.1•11/ '''1./ "1'" '-'-'.'''.''5,....,1.1.'..'i-1,-1, r-T71-1-': -!-Fii-T11-1,4-141-Iri--i-l-i-. '- ---%!-\,,z.-Yr-H........ J . MI CAR/Ye d. 1 1 . . .._ ,I ' / I. <a I IL imal ay ... .... 1 . irlifidill-M4r1111111Efi\ .1_r . , I IN''I 1 i ,, / i DOES 03‘11111,11MI Lt1111,1 111•111.0.9.1:1X1 14111K 11101 OE X.1-roo an.we coma mact-cr 111.1.111•1111/1 111..1V.0 . WM,11101 i I i ' 0 *.L I I : ,. •••• m OM 1.136s I , I. I I i.,, .17. . .. r• 1 i '.- MEM • 1 I ..,4..- ! - USISS I U8 VOW, I ...,::' rn S 'n 17,GITY MAP *. CO-_I : • •• . .. .: .,, M_ ,••,,,- isaues = sut f•my , 0 •-.44,- 1 ...... 15 I Fl CI„ ; . '--r-,_F...: ,,: 1 Jr 11761 Z phr,(D •-, d % ..., , 1110.11 IA --....- . :4.7'i.i.:1;:M:•---i'' / -''' i • • "4.' : I . '., .''.'.. (....) (..) 6 '''''''IPti •,,t'f-i ?. 0.,...., i •• ...... ,...,,,L.: ,,,':;•%i•,•'•-•••- e,1 ,'•,• '31,....,;;.':,3.:•!..i.t I.,...,,,:11 .. s , --•,.. , .., ,-•:i.::•r . I • , : '.---ra=" I Stsflo SOU LW • ..-....--.- PM W •"i'''...,1'.:! ' ...^..-..;... V . e':.'k.' /'"i.'-',L'i'." -k -r. -IL-e''.• l''.' -i:'..f .-• U A ci 1:::;,:.....1- . _ ..;',".- ... :•: •'. I .,., ,_, • hi - I-'F'...1 '', .... ::..: •.;.-.: ,,.i'-'''-•; :, '.31L•...2'-: l'- ea... ': :: u,0 -::4..,..",..... ...;••• '...:''.'2i r, -t f„,.cYd c._,1,71, ''•:.-"--11. ,' L-: - •• ._,__ ..':;;;.:::':. I L13 ouNer• m e • - .0 •-- 9.1‘,'- Pni 1 'T MOOD / 11,11.1119.11111 • •10 r.iii,"...els , . • I. 1 I ..() C) •. , Pcm“4•Nama® I I ,-.---''''''' num. .,...„.., . 1111.611110C ,s 0 • , . I ! I I h 1 ---. • • • . 111111 • • [1-11-11 1 ...... - • • I 1 I 1 -' • ;,..,,,,,,,,,k I ,i,_ • ... • • . I. SOMAS SITE AMOY& I 10•:.7.'1.\I\( .*. . • I I I 11'1'i t. r.'.....:--.. I '.:".f..:i.'i I.I-. • --i, ..... • • - :RI 'gg,..4.., -• . .]::::'1,:1p.r. . f'li;',..*. - Eissa I . I NIX• .:Qr.,.•1,,... • r---t-s7-. R.11111 ' 1 MN ... 1°1- i . . ' I ' ,E. .1 I I li- . j I:ANA.- lam Po Ns essosa I- r=g, . amen V • I) I r C011•11111..11.17.1.111.111 I I . I L Mt SIM SR 111011 •U•S le 010111..01. _0411{FM Vaalvae. r41011.We . I - - - ::::"....C.:1'...- 1 E•7::" I rg.T11:151rret.•"gpm MIR..9.6 VI , ••1 , _, t ...,,.i. • .:;.1 E• . I / r..7. - --.- ) •••• ,. ,.._,.....4. •;.,...131,---:.--e. • 4 1,1 f ItilA .•"-,- . •. .-. .•••:;:q;;',.:. .,,,I....i::.', • , • • - '• '•..91e( . '1 ' I ,..-..9•:'4..•-r,-;;''''.. ....'.,:.•11.:4. 1111'rl.' --1 'A '1:;t!.,'..,W; CONCEPTUAL t F'..;:iT.7.,.... , .. • GRADING.DRAINAGE. .,..„.______,-,,,!, _ '---2`" --- ,- '•,--,sts 27171------Z.1.417 -- .•,.tr c,„,....‹.., 1.1114 1.1111 F:r AND unurEs PLAN COD0017.1D . =T. .1. =Tat%sat.''''' 1.3:IfrTh 13101.10[1113 Mal 11:111541•1119.11.411011 ........_I_ FY;4;.,_ _ _ if‘,,,,.,‘‘,......._ =,,,,,„,._ - }1.4.KI,1.1f0 es A -• - . . r•oe:1%7. ,z7.: imusstort SUM.INS RAI IS MX MOW T.'7.'-' 10.110;011plimma 00.10J1 to CEOPKIE ..7.11.4:11 %OM%61:10.01 i /I.AO 11151/4 MAI RIMS.0 COO.ii. ,::iir.,:g. 4..1:OLIN POMO Sr.1.[01.49.MO 1-IS-It KIM " Fc...i..;:li. I 100104 my WI MO a 6 IX CUMMIC4•5 C1.2 Pr Wakilign 10 uni MIT ICCONS IN nir 1/10 • , i: • • ? T� P � 55. Q ? ? � 7 ? ? T ? ? .� ] > e e �./ e o ,0 , ,a ,i.a/ s e U e to o i, ] a�.�P•`«— MN I I 1 I---I I I-___}___+.____I I— + + f I— I I 1--: I I «,.....« I°PM! II 1 1 i 4r::1 14 ii III °SOUTH ELEVATION n NI 111 • ...v««..,..�. L'''';"= a ] ] IODD V ? ? Y s ? ? { { ? T T P T { T P T (7 ='-zr— /W' I •� I I I I I 1 1 + + + I f I f f I I I `CC i mHl's' I t EI I n I imj 1 �+. 1 I'.i•1ijm._ Z, W2 0 o ()NORTH ELEVATION h.•.a r �I U Q v g i If LOC OP ROM.ODOM. LBC 7 ¶ T ¶ 7 ? ¶ 7 7 ¶ T ¶ 71 - T. �p; gi �h I IIgglIg�l i I I I _ i �C �Im � I I I at I-- r ' '��W cc8 ()WEST ELEVATION «. o• p D ,OC a PR«O„o. a 9 T T T T 7 T-A 7 7 T T —ice ra —i i i�`�-Ili; i ' i i M-51 °EAST ELEVATION �.•.a =� DS Ce .m • I I I I I I I I P T I uI I _ s ? n e O ? ? © a ± 1 I I I I i pill DIMING BUILDING I I I I I I ^rI— ELEVADONS I I I I I I I I I ; I I 1 I I I I I i - p° • ()BUILDING SECTION• Ali NOT FOR COfEINUCTION�.---- r . • (`�' (�' ? (��' (`�' (�� (.�' (�' (') M 9 I ? � I' ¶ ¶ 9) ¶ I I I I 9) ? ? ? ? ? I Q Q I 9 'e':T HUN o r 1 0 o e e o . n o ♦ 1 i„,,.,..„ i i 1 r i r« —\• i r—r—j ir:=rt.. -- i i i r "� i r� i r" t"" i i - i i ............... ..•—,.._ It i • I I I I I • -I' .I I I �' 1 � I I I I I 't. I I •IT,iI 1 1 / I 1 I I 1 I I ! 1 li; ► 9 I • I • Len rt L,..,., „��. Tle,o�.�; ... 1 ,.�,,..... ..o,,.:„ . I I �r �.,.. 1 1 I I I I .. I t �. ,e ;. �:.e,. a ,.. TO:e ..®...,�e °NORTH ELEVATION 1 I —ri- I i -——1 i I I I I I "i— i '^"ie i ^ ''°�I —i i I I p"^`' I I �' p .4 Le i I I -i— l u I l i . 10:jiil i® .,..:r .IL': rI .,............ .1'.,................®tap!," 1 :..mi � lw■■ ii yip mu .1_,.,li 1 1. -'II O 9 �� :-..�,.:,.>:• ::. .. ., , °a->ue . Illu'llipilllllllliulUllllllll Ili! 1 lip ii ;i1 v® II ®e 'I' I j .. j . .. ---.i .., ... . ... I. : ,,., L • bA a °SOUTH ELEVATION ...,a U i i i i - ii .�� , W oi ci.■■ ■, v,bitTK EMT Vma...�..a wrt. fq�„.,,......a._,II■■■■I 1 u,rvmei 6t...0 euv:�u_ �!-� • °ELEV.• EAST&WEST ENTRANCE ,4 °ELEVATION•SOUTH ENTRANCE rr —— • QoI QI Io Q Io q/35(e9♦IT!APY.OYY I I I I T I I 9 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 m a. I I I I I I I / I �P[O M.. I l I I I I ....•MTMT 1 Le.� EAST ELEVATION - 09 •�� 4 4 4 7 4 9) 4 I 1 I 1 e.,,eo Fl.e,.,. 1 ,e.,.m I • 1 PROPOSED .oe.w. 1 r.n mnR e 1 o� •— _ • ""o•"`I BUDDING ELEVATORS II C JI al II I --ii WY.M./1.—.,,,,:i 1 T`,.. L I L J eooe, + I�rr ra r a e e _ — ` BIB ! m. ! __ eoe M.,e. .� a+ • .45 e.l000ee ,unrP ... r.-... OP WEST ELEVATION " I' IA—o.u.urt,.mn w.. I I I 1 I ....,a tA .11 NGT FOR COf�EflUCTgN , ll M MITHUN i •w..s..v _ _ .....ma.. I NORM a.,a.mry _ © ® Q t i i I ir.,,•.�.4:.-.1 i i i i i---\ i i i I I I I i 1 I •.[.. •.. i I rt I I tr i—',---,,,i i i 1 `— i 1 '-i* oo .E I I I . R .0 ,a 1 x ' tee ,� � _3 . I Y. SP PAIX =5 I c r € L_--d-�- — n a I — --r W p o e i :.•fS-rrggaLr3:;«t V„5i>p rt ....... - r.+nn_�>.I�'-. N . ® CED i "-a'1'e,Kz0 °BUILDING SECTION .e ro °BUILDING SECTION U, V1 w ca o o cr)c.) o - *PIMP PITC APPROVAL yY� o , > >, ♦ Q e �. e a o , Qr a P ? ? ? ? ? I ? ? P P 9 9 ? T I 9 ? 9 9 ! 9 I 9 1 I I i i ; \ i e �i —1--i —i i i I I I v i r� i `� I•a i i I I I I I I L I I r--- —1 I�I i 1 I I 1 1 -- ...= ;,, I_ m i h .�. . __x_._..t.,7__I__ ____ , __ ____ ____ I_ _____l___4-4__ . ' )11 . T ? 1 1 °BUILDING SECTION _- .+e.rd N PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS eeee> wn>,ce A. A6.0 NOT FCFl CLNvIfiUCiION—..--- , < :; iiiiii. : E l rosy : iiiiiiiiiiiii : ::::::::::...........;::: ;::<:::::<:;>::>:::::::::<::<::::<::::<::::<::::<:::::GtiRRE(tiIT'PIA.iVNIN. ..On/. .I.O111..:............:......:.......::........... . .:............::::....... ::.::: ::; »: :::::::::::::::::::::>:::;>:«:: :: :::<:::»:<:::;:::::::;.F.LC}AVIT.F:>S.RV.. ....BY.M,A.N. ... .. . On the 3K day of DecevAo-eY- , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing e.c. d e,---Ceyvv'\ o-v\ documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology • Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) - - - • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS . COUNTY OF KING • ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SA-r,A r a - .� D p. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for G. uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 0 0.,_ / , y1 1 MARIL I ; Notary Public i .c• for the State of Washi I NOTARY PUBLIC I •ILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print) MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment expires: • JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: Project Number: LUP, . c'1‘"L 15(, 54� _ \d,:v tLL NOTARY.DOC :. : , . � CIT•Y�. F :RENTON mil lit , ,{ - Planning/Building/Public Works Department :- ss lil� :. • • Gregg Zimmerman P.E. Administrator . - •- Jesse Tanner,"Mayor ;. ,:•, -:. , .. '_ -, - December 02 1909. :1 _ -- -- - Washington State Department of Ecology , Environmental Review Section O Box ymp a4WA3 Ol 98504-I 7703 - = Subject: . , _ Environmental Determinations --- • 'Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 30, 1999: . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED i SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF . The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughout the site. The project woul0 require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal is a'parking modification request to provide parking below the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A), which is currently under review with the City.. Location: 1000 SW 43rd Street. Appeals of either the environmental•determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton • City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, • /4:: )...7'..ZJ /(2VZ : — Lesley Nishihira Project Manager . cc: - King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation ' Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities ,- Duwamish Tribal Office : . Rod Malcom,Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) - _ _ •' --Joe e Jainga-Puet-Sound Ener — - ,1055 South Grady Way_ Renton,•Washington 98055 :. This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer `. N E TO R NPlanning%BuildiriglPublic Works Department e ::Jesse Tanner,Mayor ; .:: : - Gregg Zimm rman P.E.;Administrator :December 02 1999 • • Mr.Jay Pickering,AIA - = Mithun Partners, Inc.' 414 Olive Way#500 1 Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: SeaPack Centre -Project No. LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Pickering: This letter is written Ion behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)•;and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on November 30, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination"[ROW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. I The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call ' me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Lesley Nishihira` Project Manager cc: Pacific NW Group/Owners Seattle Packaging Corporation Enclosure 1055,South Grad Wa -Renton Washington 98055 - -•• : . : -• This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer .. • - •.. ..-.. -, , - - • • CITY OF RENTON --- _-- -_ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE === MITIG ATE 'MITIGATIO• .N :MEASURES'AND C• ONDITIONS • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF _ ._ _._____APPLICANT: -.: . _ - Seattle Packing Corporation • PROJECT NAME: SeaPack Centre DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughoet the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation.;."'Also included with the proposal is a parking modification request to provide parking,below the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL- A), which is currently under review with the City. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1000 SW 43`d Street MITIGATION MEASURES: • 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the:Geotechnical Report, prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc:,with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. ` 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. • The Site Plan for the SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan to accurately reflect the dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. This revision will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be subject to any future revisions of the - - short plat application prior to its recording. 2. The applicant shall obtain approval for the requested parking modification to allow fewer parking • spaces than required by code. In the event the modification is not approved, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to comply with the parking regulations,or establish an alternative` means for the provision of the necessary spaces (e.g., off-site or shared parking arrangements). The',satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall decommission the loading dock doors on the north side of the building prior • - to the final inspection of.the building permit. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. CITYOF.RENTON --_ .— — _ - T -DETERMINATIONOF NONSIGNIFICANCE-,. ;T.- _ ::.(MITIGATED). ADVISORY:NOTES _.• APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF . . _APPLICANT: Seattle Packing Corporation PROJECT NAME: SeaPack Centre DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review;and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be • removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12-i00 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the,use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal is a parking modification request to provide parking below the minimum number, required by code. The subject proposal is located'on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A),which is currently under review with the City. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1000 SW 43`d Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not,subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The applicant will need to revise the site plan in order to provide a minimum drive aisle width of 24 feet along the south side of the building. This revision may also require modifications to the proposed landscape plan (e.g.; reduction in additional width proposed) in order to satisfy the requirement. The revised site plan,(and landscape plans, if necessary)will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A separate sign permit application is required for any proposed signage for the project. • 3. The applicant will be required to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit if any construction work or site modifications occur within the designated 200-foot Shoreline Master ' Program boundary of Springbrook Creek. 4. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan so that it accurately reflects the • dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. For example, the site plan shows a total site area of 15,250 square feet greater than the area indicated on the short plat survey. There are also discrepancies between the dimensions of the property - --. boundaries. These revisions will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will • be dependent upon any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. 5. The site plan will need to indicate which stalls are proposed to be compact in size. This - revision Will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Buildino . 1. The proposal is required to comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. .. - SeaPack Centre" :Advisory Notes (continued) • " Page2of2 Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 gpm. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Existing hydrants • are allowed to satisfy this requirement, provided they are retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways must have a minimum width of 20 feet with an outside turning radius of 45 feet and 25 feet on the inside. 4. A list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on-site must be provided. 5. The Renton Fire Department does not support vaariances to provide less than the required parking per code. . Plan Review—Sewer 1. The project is not proposing any additional"sewer connections outside the building, so no sewer permits will be required. The site has previously paid-waste water(SDC)fees. Plan Review—Drainage 1. The project will not increase the on-site impervious surface, so no;permit or System Development Charges fon storm water will be required. •, Plan Review—Water • 1. As proposed,the project will not require any additional water main or fire hydrants. However, all existing hydrants must be retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings pursuant to Fire Department requirements. The site has previously paid water(SDC)fees. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The site has existing street improvements(curb, gutters, sidewalks,street paving and street lights)on the street frontages of Oakesdale Ave SW, SW 43`d:St, and SW 41st St. If new driveways are installed, they must satisfy current city codes and standards. Parks 1. All landscape areas outside property lines are to be maintained by the applicant. Police ; • - 1. The proposal would generate an estimated 32.67 additional CFS annually. King County Waste Water Treatment Division • 1. Construction drawings for the project should be submitted to Eric Davison in the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, MS KSC-NR-0500,for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Eric can be reached at(206)684-1707. • 2. Please contact Eric Davison at(206)684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing any construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site during construction. 3. King County has a permanent easement for the trunk sewer line adjacent to the site. Prior to project approval, King County must be guaranteed the right to maintain and repair the sewer line.' In the event that the line must be relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way, MS KSC-NR-0600, at the address above, or at (206)296-7804,to discuss the matter. 4. Theiapplicant must provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland at(206)296-7804 to discuss the matter. " . ; CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S) LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Packing Corporation PROJECT NAME: SeaPack Centre DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal is a parking modification request to provide parking below the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A), which is currently under review with the City. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1000 SW 43rd Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the!environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 6, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 1999 SIGNATURES: • N/3o Pgitg:#11 ern ,/Iti ra or DATE ��Departo anning/Building/Public Works ______ 77-4e,,, . 4..A.,C t( (?, 6, m Shepherd, Administrator J!'CDATE Community Services itmil/ P Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief / D E Renton Fire Department eresignature -- CITY OF:RENTON ; T - -. .. DETERMINATION OF-NON-SIGNIFICANCE=:IT_- • ---• • MITIGATED =:> MITIGATION MEASURES AND`CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF • _::,APPLICANT: Seattle Packing Corporation +_ PROJECT NAME: SeaPack Centre DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughd'ut the site. The project would require the use of _3,000.- cubic 'yards of pie-load for site .preparation. Also included with the proposal is a parking modification 'request to provide parking.:below the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat (File No. LUA,-99-103,SHPL- A), which is currently under review with the City. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: - 1000 SW 43rd Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report, prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc.,with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site: - - : 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$0.52 per square foot of new construction._The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. • The Site Plan for the SeaPack Centre, File No. LUA-99-156, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan to accurately reflect the dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. This revision will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be subject to any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. • , 2. The applicant shall obtain approval for the requested parking modification to allow fewer parking spaces than required by code. In the event the modification is not approved, the applicant shall either.revise the site plan to comply with the parking regulations, or establish an alterriative means for the provision of the necessary spaces (e.g., off-site or shared parking arrangements). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The(applicant shall decommission the loading dock doors on the north side of the building prior . to th'e final inspection of the building permit. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division.` - - 'CITY;OF 'RENTON - 7.-T DETERMINATION;OF MITIGATED = • AD VISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF •APPLICANT: . . Seattle Packing Corporation _ _ __ • PROJECT NAME: SeaPack Centre DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feet in additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft. of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12I100 sq.ft. of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of.3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal is a parking Mddificatiori request to provide parking below the minimum number required by code. The.subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103;SHPL=A),which is currently under review with the City. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. . "1000 SW 43rd Street Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not'subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning . 1. The,applicaht will need to revise the site plan in order to provide a minimum drive aisle width of 24 feet along the south side of the building. This revision may also require modifications to the proposed landscape plan (e.g.,reduction in additional width proposed)in order to satisfy the requirement. The revised site plan(and landscape plans, if necessary)will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A separate sign permit application is required for any proposed signage for the project. • 3. The applicant will be required to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit if any construction work or site modifications occur within the designated 200-foot Shoreline Master Program boundary of Springbrook Creek. 4. The applicant will be required to revise the proposed site plan so that it accurately reflects the • dimensions indicated on the surveyed short plat plan for the property. For example, the site plan shows a total site area of 15,250 square feet greater than the area indicated on the short plat,survey. There are also discrepancies between the dimensions of the property boundaries. These revisions will be required prior to the issuance of building permits and will be dependent upon any future revisions of the short plat application prior to its recording. • 5. The site plan will need to indicate which stalls are proposed to be compact in size. This -revision Will be-required prior to the issuance of building permits. .. .__.. Building 1. The proposal is required to comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. - • •. '...':SeaPack!Centre- . - — _ ' LUA-99,1:56,SA-A;_ECF • - - — -— --_ Advisory Notes (continued) - • - _ Page 2 of 2 Fire Prevention - • —• • ----- -- --- — 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 gpm. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Existing hydrants are allowed to satisfy this requirement, provided they are retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways must have a minimum width Of 20 feet with an outside turning radius of 45 feet and 25 feet on the inside. 4. A list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on-site must be provided. - 5. The Renton Fire Department does not support variances to provide less than the required parking per code. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The project is not proposing any additional sewer connections outside the building, so no , sewer permits will be required. The site has previously paid\waste water(SDC)fees. Plan Review—Drainage 1. The project will not increase the on-site impervious surface,so no permit or System Development Charges for storm water will be required. Plan Review—Water • 1." As proposed, the project will not require any additional water main or fire hydrants. However, all existing hydrants must be retrofitted'with 5-inch storz fittings pursuant to Fire Department requirements. The site has previously paid water(SDC)fees. Plan Review—Transportation - - - 1. The site has existing street improvements(curb, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights)on the street frontages of Oakesdale Ave SW, SW 43rd.St, and SW 41st St. If new driveways are installed,they must satisfy current city codes and standards. Parks 1. All landscape areas outside property lines are to be maintained by the applicant. Police 1. The proposal would generate an estimated 32.67 additional CFS annually. King County Waste Water Treatment Division 1. Construction drawings for the project should be submitted to Eric Davison in the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, MS KSC-NR-0500,for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Eric. can be reached at(206)684-1707. • 2. Please contact Eric Davison at(206)684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing any construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site during construction. 3. King County has a permanent easement for the trunk sewer line adjacent to the site. Prior to project approval, King County must be guaranteed the right to maintain and repair the sewer line. In the event that the line must be relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way, MS KSC-NR-0600, at the address above, or at (206)11296-7804,to discuss the matter. 4. The applicant must provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless • ' agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland at(206)296-7804 to discuss the matter. ... I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION — —NOTICE—OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee T�T �*T,�T (ERC) has issued a Determination of SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL Non-Significance - Mitigated for the fol- lowing project under the authority of the 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Renton Municipal Code. , SEAPAC CEN RE LUA-99-1 6,SA-A,ECF a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal io ro to ex �ea-forh useopose.truc structure.; lions existing warehouse structure` newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Location: 1000 SW 43rd Street. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language i Appeals of either the environmental deter continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South Countyurination [RCW a3. , WAC 1 11-680] and/or the land and use 7 usee(3)decision,must Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM.j State of Washington for King County. December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County I Appeals must be filed in writing together Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers with the-required $75.00 application fee during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a 1 with: Hearing Examiner, City-of Renton; Seapack Centre 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA ' 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are Joy- ' erned by City of Renton Municipal Code as published on: 12/6/99 Section 4-8-110.. Additional,information. regarding the :appeal process may be. obtained from the Renton City Clerk's The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publi • '_ the sum of$43.13, Office,(425)430-6510. charged to Acct. No. 805106 Publication Date:December 6, 1999 •Published in the'South County-Journal-1 y December 6, 1999.6945 Legal Number 9645 Legal Clerk, So ounty "urnal Subscribed and sworn before me on this (y day of -, 195 ODDQQQQQQ�PPPPpp,,, .® /�` -774Q1Ladlf__. o,® � l �•. r'`ip ".;�� ' Notary Public of the State of Washington • ' F�a► �;,P :`=,;,a residing in Renton e -��-- -. King County, Washington r -3-l,TF.0 6 c.. -tia az d''ti©p 1. 9 C'y ve'‘i:%° NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SEAPACK CENTRE LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for proposed renovations to existing warehouse structure. Location: 1000 SW 43rd Street. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Publication Date: December 6, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot NoncE . . , . , . - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SEAPACK CENTRE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99.158,SA•A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for . proposed renovations to an existing warehouse structure. The renovations Include the construction of supporting office space totaling 41,940 square feel In additional area. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed,Including 42 trees,end replaced with 12,100 sq.g.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also Included with the proposal is a parking modification request to provide parking below the minimum number required by code.The subject proposal Is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No.LUA-99-103,SHPL-A),which is currently under review with the City.Location:1000 SW 43i°Street. ' THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11.680]and)or the land use • decision must be glad In writing on or before 5:00 PM December 20,1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final.Appeals must be Bled in writing together with the required 975.00 application too with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.110. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. , fir,/. t I,!��y:�Lr+I�a-fir•)) V` t i r jar\' 1 , , pie�lEle �� _. -/ fit _ . _ .. . , , ,,_ . . 1 -..!,1... -- , . ' 1 • -�� • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for prop'erfile identification. CERTIFICATION I, die -i Nr5h iintiri, , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on I Ad ... ; Dccc vim, O '`4-(�1'1I • Signed: 724%A 6, 1Z2:::) ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pubic, ' or fate of � , on the ,� TNCI I ' .Washington residingui g..,, ARC' �UBL lc STATE®F�ASHINCTON �_-- OOMMISSftJN EXPIRES ` � JIJi43E , 2003 W MARILYN KAMCHEPF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 . ,gm. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: OV�dVVIIC� D2UthD VAQ,,I, MMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 23, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICANT: Seattle Packaging Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: SeaPack Centre WORK ORDER NO: 78603 LOCATION: 1000 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 15 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 371,070 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure. The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed,including 42 trees,and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS jl"GLr S 01.31 c,.►v raZ. 7}— v � '- A./a 9 61.4 L y I S . . �-.5111-41TA �1 o P Leroy)wL C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where.additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( -i A 1-4161A fN ) I/Ic?ii/9f Signature ofDirt}Y,for or Authbrized Representative Date routing V Rev.10/93 • 1111, City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Transportation Comments Due:November 23, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated:November 9, 1999 Applicant: Seattle Packaging Corporation Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Title: SeaPack Centre Work Order No: 78603 Location: 1000 SW 43rd St. Site Area: 15 acres Building Area(gross): 371,070 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments The site has existing street improvements (curb, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights) on the street frontages of Oakesdale Ave SW, SW 43rd St. and SW 41st St. If new driveways are installed they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Traffic mitigation fee of$75/trip of new traffic generated by the change in use will be required. !l-22-77 Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date SeaPack2 __1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RAPS COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 23, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICANT: Seattle Packaging Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: SeaPack Centre WORK ORDER NO: 78603 LOCATION: 1000 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 15 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 371,070 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation,is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure. The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed,including 42 trees,and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS •Qf -icy av--�s �P d (�io� ,beiw //z .tat,6 '1��,Cc)• (312l°e74- )a7 iv--,?e 12e aro.rof 70/' A,ystor-arpais-hz-ye)/7643e- re--/r13/-a/ -lent/ j5764_, ,P76.7vel //ie. 746 _Nia-e gyg,me/ opistacce/h7-7 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi anal information is needed to openly assess this proposal. 7 Sign ure of Director orAutt�riz Represe ative L^' Date r//7 routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r C 11 f'. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 23, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICANT: Seattle Packaging Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: SeaPack Centre WORK ORDER NO: 78603 LOCATION: 1000 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 15 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 371,070 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant,Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure. The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees, and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet i 14,000 Feet an ad C.1:c. tri? ..?. 7 C�.S Gt 2/wa -_ /�.1a70061-77orx--' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director 0 Mithorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 4110 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Water Comments Due:November 23, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated:November 9, 1999 Applicant: Seattle Packaging Corporation Project Manager:Lesley Nishihira Project Title: SeaPack Centre Work Order No: 78603 Location: 1000 SW 43`d St. Site Area: 15 acres Building Area(gross): 371,070 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Water: The project will not require any additional water main or fire hydrants as proposed but existing hydrants must be retrofitted with 5" Storz fittings per the Fire Department. The site has previously paid water(SDC)fees. EieGe-~Ati,7—j 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date SeaPackl • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Surface/Waste Water Comments Due:November 23, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated:November 9, 1999 Applicant: Seattle Packaging Corporation Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Title: SeaPack Centre Work Order No: 78603 Location: 1000 SW 43rd St. Site Area: 15 acres Building Area(gross): 371,070 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The project will not increase the on-site impervious surface so no permit or SDC fees for storm water will be required. Waste Water: The project is not posing any additional sewer connections outside the building so no sewer permit will be required. The site has previously paid wastewater(SDC)fees. i/-z z 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date SeaPack City of Ri x.• Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT1 APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fG l✓VV[1QY1 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 23, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICANT: Seattle Packaging Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley ji1 N 11::)CF nor PROJECT TITLE: SeaPack Centre WORK ORDER NO: 78603 rIr ' LOCATION: 1000 SW 43rd Street 91999 SITE AREA: 15 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 371,070._s .ft. , � ' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant,Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting EnvironmerftaPFEE)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure. The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed, including 42 trees,and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED,COMMENTS 5-az-e_ g-ct-c-LeGO We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to proper) assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date routing Rev.10/93 �Y &. CITY OF RENTON 4?c— FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 15, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihara, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for Seattle Packaging Corporation Project MITIGATION ITEMS: 1. A fire mitigation fee of$28,782 is required based on $0.52 per square foot of additional square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Existing hydrants can meet this requirement if they are retrofitted with 5-inch storz fittings. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. 5. The Renton Fire Department does not support variances to provide less than required parking per code. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (Jo Sevv IC.&) COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 23, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICANT: Seattle Packaging Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley NishRli�d"L®PMENT SERVICES CITY®r RENTON PROJECT TITLE: SeaPack Centre WORK ORDER NO: 78603 LOCATION: 1000 SW 43rd Street 4in 0 9 1999 SITE AREA: 15 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 371,070 sq.ft. C'E1VF_P SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant,Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure. The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.ft.of existing landscape areas will be removed,including 42 trees,and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site. The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code. The subject proposal is located on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File No. LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS L G j 7 c'"7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 3cj' 3 . • r-vY O • •raw a �!7NL: ,(A:w�pwr<•• >;�,�, ,a�� � r�:»V"'a�,.bi!�!t."'�!�'c2%e.`' tr+,✓,.ww..;�..�.�.ya�aC:*s?y.KC+},.�;w,r•;.yp�V, a ylronrrr»uwr,?:.:ow x•Y..v:n.;,►3.:.s..,;:i4...,.ie.....� �c:.:-u:•.,. 'wr.r.E'wax•a4r.✓a�rv,�w.....n.e�..:5'r�,» ,�Aa..�•».•.—�:;.o.. . Project Name Scuttle FPccckalj* vq1 Cvvp, Project Address 1000 51,o 43va S Z Contact Person Jack Al k+vt. Address Phone Number 206 _ 72 5 - 3000 • Permit Number LUA- qq - 156 Project Description Expcvvtd 2 ,s l/i(i 1/0 a vz l&wu 14I r(g[) 5 . f toY,J a/ 4/3 ) 0/0 sf. (e4,,st,ite 37J ) 071) s .f. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ( /501 ❑ Residential CITE Trip Generation Manual. per. 14(3 ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study GI/Non-retail 0 Other F (' Cam, ✓e F��c,c��,��� T — 3. g' ( X) -+ 3Lk - t.;50 Calculation: r---- C���t��. uvevc%, -fv,ps = 3.e:A (371-v7) 3c/2• 65 — I7D?, 2 6 ?/ tv,�J mew -toral 4✓ev, / 1,7,0s 5,69 (ii/�.01) T q . 45 2. G dail Z1/ I fUeT ]ICuJ Wally GVifS : (i b 6z . 6 ) - ( 17O .2 ) - 15 Li. ,;(,--tat 71'ys A 7(j i GC4,I ZYI 0 C 75) ( 1514- 1 = fI15W• °° 00 Transportation Mitigation Fee: I1 5 SQ-. Calculated by: Ai Wa 4('/ Date: r1/30/9�I Account Number: 105. 5 Rq. 31 O, 70.OD. - -- Date-of-Payment -------- -- - - ........ . . ......... ...„ ......................... ....... ......„.. ............ ..................CITY OF RENTON iiittISTD:FSURROUNDI.N.GPROPERTYDWNERSM iiiiiiiiiii PROJECT NAME: e'APAcw--ic---Ceiv772-e oe,e, gef T. Fe"riev•I APPLICATION NO: LUA 99 . 15(pi -4 , EL.r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AnrAre-tteo Ltsr Fpom " coA. -27‘4' 6/1q41 L, • • • • • • i• • • • • I •• I • •••• /62 • (:) . • • • . , . . . . "(Attach additional sheets, if necessary) i - • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER -JAY P ?g Aec-rpplicant Certification . 1. .. . .,. • 14144,493/1a14- I, ttAtT7qt tnl PAN ', /AJG. , , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records CI Kitle ng County ssessors Records ,seo.s �\�p,9GEC,,go'00000 �,• •..5S1O N F-1-'• st• . Signe Date t�/V f•�_' o NOI-ARY/9``N•: (Applicant / - *l PP ea • PUBLIC „ Z.0 0 :/:. NOTARY yi,••.GL!s-r 9.1 \,▪ C./•„.> ATTESTED: ubscribed nd sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the Staf�,9� ptihEttb , residing at (1 t )O h on the„Pt, day of �t .41,„,4,ipsPJ 'i. Signed l''S-J (N tary Public) .. "::•CERTIFICATION::OF M LIN.G.: <;>:: :` :;:: ?':»;>: :s [ ... ..::::.::.::.:::.::...:.: . ::. .:: R A I,Sui4i& C`:" '`l ::; hereby,certify:that;notices;of the:proposed;application:were mailed to;;;<:::: Ci �Em loyee ;;....::;.:. :.::..::;. ::.,..::::.;:::. . .. . :.:.::....>:::.:. ..::::: :. :::.::.:. ., • each:listed property owner on r10V -V 1 .. Signed _V -e4' Date.(\O"J "i lfI°I 1: :: .OT....Y• ,.. : ;; .,:a:'::' •: '< ;:>:::.:::.:. .. ;.:- ;:. '- .,. .. ` ::' .:-. N AR ATTEST: •Subscribed,:and.;sworn before me,a;Notary Public;iri.and for.:the State.of.Washington:residing. a ori`theA r,st da of _ Signed`:: l: .. : :: ' :.. .::::>: <: >::' :41 APY P..UBLIG� . a� t listprop.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF # OMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 JIlINII~Z9,2003 • . " * **(.c*5i.4.*..,4**le*tt'.****..*..*.***.:„:"K.:::..*:...*....:.*:.:.:*.:..:*.*.:..*:?.+5...::#.s.t..*7..:.:!....•!:..7:::.*".7."..*•1:'„*..:....;...:.4.c...*....:..*.....:..>1‘.......:."...:i.k........*.....7.,?...,...*........*,.................;.:::::......:. . ...'......'.....,.............*:..'..1...•:*.'..<..**...*.:•1!*.*....:::*..'*. *.'*..".:**%..'"*.*...sk...:."*„.*.......*..............*.*.j.....4........:1?..... 7....?.'''.•.:•*•.:..:4!.:.*.......:.*....*...*....:*.!....*.......::. .fo,......#.:,..*..sk*...,.'"*.•.'....:*'.1.*A:i..*:....:..*......'..mi...7..:iii..........i.. .... . . BATCH NUMBER LQ COMMENTS CUSTOMER PERKINS COIE •ix*�xsk ix*�k*�K�k 7k �$.7k:x*�s*ak* •:k'�x�= :k *S3: • *�k�i• •.*�x3k-:.". •a•:-. .i'.. ******��x�k * 7k:x* 1k *S . .-...*�k .*.ka'...• :..';:. s: *xv�k *.#**:*****is * * ik* skx* 7 ***. **** t PGA:. . ":•.. ATRP4.8 , R !!!,. .0 ht:•Q I•R. • ;16/.2.3/134:•: . PAGE :iJOB. .f . • • :MCI Q4Q . • • e . • : ":.- : e . . : 125360-0060-06 ACTIVE POWELL—ORILLIA L L C 769999 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 737 MARKET ST ' ::." : • •••:•.?••::::.• • • . • • •": . • •• . " . . ••• s. • . i : .. •: •••••-: .•: . *-:: . • • " • :• •• •' • • • •• •:•• • : ' • • :•':::•:•• ..'• . • •125360-0062-04 ACTIVE POWELL—ORILLIA L LC 869800 COMMENTS CUSTOMER ND. 737 MARKET ST • • • • • • :"" 125380-0170-09 ACTIVE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 301603 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. C/O R J HALLISSEY CO INC AGT . . BELLEVUE WA... • ::::::::::: " 8Q05 ."•••• :" •• • • •••:". • '• • • .••• • .•• : ::::::: •:•:•.••.; 125381-0020-00 ACTIVE BEDFORD PROPERTY INVESTORS 709999 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO ':17Q.:.1.;AAYETT.E g. .. • . . --••••••::• • •f.A.FjiYET18,.:CA::.:•::::". • 9449 • e " 125381-0040-06 ACTIVE PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER & 759999 ' COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO ••• • ' 921 TE1RV PiV , . ••••••• . " • • • " % "•—••—• • '•::::" •:•••••* ' • SEATTLE : '• Si/04% :'• • ••• .•• %• . • • 125381-0042-04 ACTIVE PUBLIC STORAGE INC 850338 COMMENTS . . CUSTOMER NO OEPT•t5I-4A-.97406 •• • . • ••••••••:' •• • .• r" • v..: • :'''' *** • .:• •'• • P0 130)c•••225 •.*:: ' . •• • ey, •••••::. ' ".: ' , . •• • t.ENIYAtE":•:d4•• -• ••• :•••••• .• • • ••—•:••• •••'15.80—.0(1$0:70 &:k: t..1-0, •.. y. • 8.0.0438.::". E NTS ' . • ••••:' :,•• • • : • •• "- ." • '' •f . " .1*ikTN • % '6605 • .".••••• •.• . . pui*Efslit:z CUSTOMER • ' .C/0..T17zitLti'i "INC:• • ". " . . SW 9TH ST RENTON WA 98055 . . . . . . . • • •• • .. .•• 125361-6240—Q4 • ACTIVE CITY RENTON.• . 94o.staz • ••••• CDMMENT5 . .-• • ' • . . . ' • • GRY AD ::: ••••• : ••••••••• . • :.• ••• ••••.••• ••••••• •. • • •••• " RENTON WA 98055 ........... : " e ::: : ' . % • • "••.:••••••.. % .... •1. • . . . V• ....... .• • • . • • • • ••••• •• ••••••••• • ••,,•••••••••• • ••••••• ••••••••••••,• •••.•••,•:•:•%,•: ,:,••••••:.:„ • • ...•: „.„ . , ,•:,..•:„.:.,:. 125381-0305-06 ACTIVE BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 COMMENTS CUSTOMER...NO. TAX DEPT SCHAIJMSUR IL 125381-0390-02 ACTIVE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 741447 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO ROPRTY TAX 1EPARTMJT GLIST:QME ' •.•NET 50N • " •%.• • KENT WA 98033 'S.12.3.05.7',90-1 AGT:i *4i ki NG • • ::•;!•• 'CUSTOMERAI:Q SAN JOSE CA 95134 312305 rr.90971406' Ite.T1 V AT LANTICJ." CHFI E ED• • • .1.• E NTS • 7 CUSTOMER'NO, • , TAX PERT • •::.i.:!:•••••••••••••.! • •-•• . • PO BOX 512485 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 • • ••••••" • ••••• " ••• • -•-• •••••••••• • ••••••• •••••••• ••••••• ••• • ••'••••••••••••" • •••••••••• •••• •••••• •'"• " • ••••••••••••••••• •• •••...........•••••••"'•••• •••••..•. --•••••'••••-• -f-KNUDSONetiNVESTMENT:SA=0 .:599$$ — COMMENT5 -.:::-,::m,..ya CUSTOMER NO. 25707 SE 192ND ST MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 . .......... . . ........... . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..... . . ... . • : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1305912$tt08% ACTIVE GENUINE 499 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 2999 CIRCLE 75 PARKWAY ATLANTA GA 30339 ,..., • .: ... •,,, , ••,• ... •. ... ..... . •• • .• 1Q91Q9 ACTIVE CITY O KENT 6O762 COMMENTS %----•%%% •••••••". .-••••••• •••••••••%%•••••• %-- ••••••••"•%------ ••••••••••••••••• ••%%%%-% %••• % %---••••• %----% •%-%•••••••••••••%. •••----%••••••-• %••• w%---•%•%%% ------•%%%•%•%%"---- • ----v.v.. • % ••••••••"•%%-%%-- . • .• .... , • . • .. , • . •.,,,,,, • .. •• ......•.. . .......... . ........ ........ .................. . ................... . . ...................... ........ . ............ ....... . . ... . ......... CUSTOMER NO. CUSTOMER SERVICES 220 4TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 . . • ••••• . .......... •••• "•• ••• •••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••: . • .. . ... ........... ........ ......... .. . .... • • • AL MCI Q4Q 362304-9005-03 ACTIVE TALLY PRINTER CORPORATION 982108 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. PO BOX 97018 • 362304-9033-09 ACTIVE ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 707 WILSHIRE BLVD #3036 % „ . . e• • ...•: %„. • ::.• • .•," "".. ••: , • •,•• • 362304-9086-05 ACTIVE BARBER ASSOCIATES 271736 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 7979 S 180TH ST } ENT WA 362304-9096-03 ACTIVE CASCADE FEDERAL CREDIT UN 542484 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. PO BOX 58450 tAT1L WA 362304-9100-07 ACTIVE COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 800581 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 601 UNION ST #5300 ;..!*. .... •:• •• • • • • • . :• •:•.: • : • .:. 362304-9101-06 ACTIVE PARK 8000 LLC 909999 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 18040 72ND AVE S WSn WA .. ... . .••• • ...... • % . • •• ...•x•••••• ..••••••••:•:•••:•••:•••••••: 362304-9104-03 ACTIVE DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 839700 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. PO BOX 297 RENT WA 362304-9108-09 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COM980998 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. 1216 N TUSTIN ST 362304-9109-08 ACTIVE ZELMAN RENTON LLC 899800 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. . 707 WILSHIRE BLVD #3036 • • • • .........• :••••::"":„:•• • .••::"", • .•; „•• .• • •, : •• • :••• „„. : , . %:„ .•, . . % • %v. .:„.% • , .• ••. • , • • :AT#04—a: • • R •E. A c 0- ft. •.p s.1" ot115 (4 .• •••• • 4 • .:••••i• -• • :JOB Ni.c1 049 . • . ' •• • ... • . . • • . : " . ••. • •:: • • . ••• „... , • • . 392680-0020-04 ACTIVE SYEN LLC & JYEN LLC 915122 COMMENTS CUSTOMER NO. REGENCY SAVINGS BANK • : •:' 11 MAISO ST •:.. : . • 7 :•:•••••••• ••• , • ::..".• OAK PARK•I ::••• ' • " • 60-202":5.:1% •••••••:::•:. •••• • •••. . • •: ••-• • •••••••;i::::••:••:••••• " . . • • " "•• - — — - - —— • 392680-0070-03.... .... ACTIVE K I RK E BY TRUST PROPERTIES 0D9999 COMMENTS 0t:ISt0vi E R ts,id...".:i]:?•••.:•-:•?..:• -0/0,t414,:•;••••••••.• : • :• •▪•• •••• 730 ARIZONA.AVE #421 . ••• •• .:::• • • 1: • :54NiAw-FONiCA. A % ••••• • •f• • • •••• • •:- •,••• • - • . •••:: • • • •••••i • .• • • • • "if . : • .:••••: •-• • ▪ , :▪ "" • " . : ••••••:••••••••:••:f .• ••:••••......:2•]:• .;•F • • •:•••• • • ; ••••••":• . • • ••'.•••••• . . • • ••••••i••:• • • •••::X •••• •••:2". ••••••• ' •"•:•••• • ": ••"i2.:.. • • •• •••••:•.i.. • .•• •.• ::••• ••• • • ." • ••••:il...• •". • • . ::: • •••••:• •: , • ••••••..:•'w ••••••• • •••••:i2..• • ' ... . • • " " • •• • : • .• - ••••••••2 ••••••: 2..• • • . % •:•• • • •• . ••••• • . • . ' • •: "." • •• • ••••••2.::••:••.•• ..,• • ••• •::•• ::?••• • :":••••••::• ::•••• • •" : •*•:•L• • :•••••• :2•••• . •••• ' •;:••••••••• ;• • :;f•• •••:' • '2. • • ••••:: . • •• ' • .•••• • • . : .:„ .•]"'"f2...." •••:]••••••••• . .. . , . . . • • . . ' • , • % •••;:.• ' • %.••••••7:•• "::••• •••• • • . . •" • . 2:.:2 • ..• • :• • :•• :: • • • • •• • • • • .. " • •••• • • • • • " " • • • •••":.......•••: •••:••••"2:i...73.": • .. •• •.••••%::•• : ▪ • : ''' •• •••• • ;••••:::" ".••••• • .••".• •••••••••• .:•i••••.• •••••• : ▪...••••• ' . ••":.••• % :••• :•• ".• ••:.••::••• • •••• ••:. : •::•:::•••:••:••• ••••::••• :Y..:•• •;2 ••• • • •••••••••• .:•.•••• • • • : :•:. ; • ••••••;;•".:..."." • •":.••• • '"••••.••• 2. 2. "••• : • :• :2•" : ":•••••:::••.• "••:, • " ••••••••• %•••:" •••••• ",, .%••••.• •• : • ••f : • .:' • . • ••• •••• ' •••••• ••: ••;•••:::i.:::: ::::•2••:% •.•:•••'. • ••••••:•2.'"2:* • •; ▪ :f •••• Comments on the above application mut;. _pitted In writing to Ms.Lesley NIshlhira,Project Manager,Development �Y Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 23,1999.If you have questions •,, O about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project vt Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any * decision on this project. 1%�'N Ctie CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 (PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 9,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF , APPLICATION NAME: SEAPACK CENTRE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Seattle Packaging Corporation, is requesting Environmental (SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for renovations to the existing warehouse structure.The proposed renovations include the construction of 51,500 sq.ft.of new accessory office space and 3,850 sq.ft.of new warehouse space. Approximately 11,700 sq.fL of existing landscape areas will be removed,including 42 trees,and replaced with 12,100 sq.ft.of new landscaping throughout the site.The project would require the use of 3,000 cubic yards of pre-load for site preparation. Also included with the proposal are revisions to the existing parking areas as well as a parking •• modification request to provide less parking than the minimum number required by code.The subject proposal is located •, iY, c a I - - on proposed Parcel A of the PNW Group A Short Plat(File Na.LUA-99-103,SHPL-A)currently under review with the City. ,-- !-_;_i tl a F ) - _ '" PROJECT LOCATION: 1000 SW 43r°Street • , _ ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(ONS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of - 4 r Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore, • • as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single �� - 1 �•"" _"•' " comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- �� t" Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. - - , ,,_, - - PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 4,1999 — I ' dlig •,•• .••• ' NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 9,1999 '', I 1 •. ",• " r __ •• •• Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Silo Plan Approval, {{{���� ,),., . Paging Modification `\,'•' ( •1•,'•s},, °n h�� Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits I S,, \'.,% �''p�o: Requested Studies. Geotec mica)Evaluation •• Location where application may 413ffi74I�U IMI ..... _ • be reviewed: Plannin/Buildin �pp 'nam' Lllf �- ❑ g g/Publy,Works Division,Development Services Department, 70IIo0 - ' 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055ii - CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • '��`_^' Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Valley(EAV)on the City's t i•e 7 \ • "� I. i Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Medium Industrial(IM)on the City's ` I�i�j �� Zoning Map.The existing and proposed use of the site for manufacturing, ����••�• r' -• processing,assembly,and storage of cardboard boxes is considered a primary e •-�r. ` i ' _ f- permitted use in the IM zone.Office uses are also allowed when secondary to a _ -.pnmary permitted use.The proposal is consistent with both the Comprehensive --="•- g-:Plan and Zoning designations. i i __—• t•- km � . a: .: �- • Environmental Documents that i Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations _ D Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Citys SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: . 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per net new average daily . trip associated with the project. NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION CERTIFICATION I, cjj icA 6413'eaetA , hereby certify that 5 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • the described property on OIvan,t,r ID , I� •• Signed: _ I p� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and State of Washington residing in` � 4,,, , on the a,�� day of /S 9 9 • -4 MARILYN KAMCHEFF `-----v-1---\ ��-- ; NOTARY PUBLIC ,- ��L� � I STATE OF WASHINGTON i COMMISSION! EXPIRES ; DUNE 29, 2003 • MARILYN KAMCHEFF r MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 - 4CITE bF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 9, 1999 Mr. Jay Pickering,AIA Mithun Partners, Inc. 414 Olive Way#500 Seattle,WA 98101 SUBJECT: SeaPack Centre Project No. LUA-99-156,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Pickering: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 30, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 5 U tj 44%S90 . Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Pacific NW Group/Owners Seattle Packaging Corporation acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 6R1This naner contains 50%recycled material.20%cost consumer Note::»ff there>_s.::...o:... ::............. ...........................:.s<:a,.;..:::.<.:.:,;:::.::.:.diti...;..;.:..: • ;;t :cn,.ra;than;;.otelegal;owner::pleasaattachaR;;additlortel:, 'notae(ied: atec.ApRi(aation.fcf.each;owrter...:; • •. i:Wii'• PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: C�4PA - cat=� P -Gi Fi NL I& P , r � ' . `� PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: �'� rl �� d LA w !coo cJw -1150-01 "5T12e0' 5-60l SnA �. T , A ' e • CITY: ] _ ' , 14 ZIP; ` ® KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • gaol —0 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): C2OL/ >` <:>`. ...A PLtC...A.....NT.;..ttf other tt�ar►.ownery„..,_. .:::.: PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: '�� [/d1 ioui s -# MA 4L4F-Ac ui p4A4 w/Acc-0 12-'f COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Pae-r--i4Ft/nl CoAP. .MPc.a` meiyT'ti8-12-e4- `ALLEY ADDRESS: �1.bl �� �)� PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ^ ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Slu 1rL , WA 41811 g • 1 m N' entUM lkouve-A w"L. TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .°.:•.1 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: `7 �r;�. J Ry PrG r� /AA t/. .... ............ - COMPANY(if applicable): ; �`.',µ - �� 'PROJECT VALUE: :"Cr.; v, i' 14 M,r u�l PAP.T•N a a, 04. ,0. M �.. • ADDRESS: ,•a l . IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 4/4 du\./� 16/Ay -�Goo ' . CITY: ZIP: s71 1 # 4 '35!© / IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: �'(SM'1� 17t 7-iv . 2ti'e.t0 - 622 3‘eH " NvJ C ZNee. ofStrt✓ iN 51kogeLu ttach`1:separate sheet if'necessar ,€»<> <>«<< >_: ><:::<>:::::»::>::>:<:;:>::<:;::::»>:::<:»:: ::<: : :; : :: 1' .:: :PROPERTY 'Att .:LEGAfr::�ES.0 R.RT1011E...a F.. ... ......:. ........:.....(..:. ..........::.... ... .......................:....::................. .....:: :). :::::::::::::::::::::::........ 3e AvrrPce-HED L..e 1AL— DE >ztPriotI 11111111111:11111111Ci ff..>wi ::: r )r i .IR.::: . : . :: ha ;8 [. .....C, . ..sta .de a .mEn: €:>f ........... :>:::>:::>:<::::.............:>;: Che.c.....a.....a . cat.o..... es::t: ..:Pp.:.::::.::...:.�Y::........................:::...:..:......:::..:::::::...:::::.::.::..:.::::::::::::::::::.:>:::::::::::::.:::::::.:;. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ • _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL . $/00 _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY • WAIVER • . ' $. • ' _ FINAL . . , . • WETLAND PERMIT $ .. , _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN , .. $ - • 0 SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charoe ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $; ) REVISION • $ RSHI:Pi<::<€i :::>:: `i:>:::><'<<':::<:i:::i<> > >« : >::ii>::>:; •:::::< ;:'•' ::> >:::<:......:;::: ::»............. :«<:::>:»:»:<:<::><:><:>:>:><:«:>:::;>:<:;:<:<:>; . l _VIT:::€O.F. QWtVERS . ..................................... ............. ..................................... .....::::: ::::..�.:::..:,.........................:..::::::::: ACE.....A:..:..:..:................................................................................. .................................... ......... ... .. I, (Print Name).f AGK ALtC)Ilk E. , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this applicatiori,gthe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please'attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscri ed nd sworn to before:.me, a Notary Public,in and A LK vaz ,- f.r a State of t1/ i hlljgsiding ate -7 (Name of Owner/Representative) JAN IR ��'��`*' -��?- •_ . on th= 1 /dey of �.�� STATE OF WA• • (Si,-•. re of Owner/Representative) ooIWMISs : -,.,-!�I( 4,/e-�r% ' AP- ,F:' '.`- , 1k�tar blic) ,.„.-:,-,•.:•:-:-:.• :.- ....:...,;,i..,:!i:.:i.:,..:•:•ii:]:,0;::,.0:.i.-:.i::.:]•ma;:m.•;E::: .•:::;:....::...:::i::::ii:.;!:.•.:'::•-:',M,!::!.];iii.:Aim.:• :••: .!i :,:i„.-..:::::; .tion;E:.•;::..:,:givi,:•:::.,.:.::i!.... .,-,i•mg,,:i;•::::.:•,.i.•:..::,::: :411r::::.:in••...:::i::-..i.•:•••mii,:,:i.::.:,..i:ii.:•::•,.:•i..... . >:::.<;>:»>:>:>:»>':>::»::<iiie:>:;:>°:<:<:>:i,:i ::.:::giii hiss ctiori;to.be.co ete b .0 toff..).. AP:S::::i AP=.L.iCRAA<[<[<CU;:;:'':'; ,. ><:` ` :F: €::LLA: >: ., ...:::..:. : : :::.>:..CI.t.::�IIe.N.umber.: ; <>. :.g:.:.;:�.;. .. ,.;:.:;:;; ....<..A...;::>;AAD::>:::;:BSP`:`::CA.:. ..:: C...... ... ................... ............................. .... ................: :. MHFP:: .:. . :. ::. ::;;:.: . :. : /A. S ...::: P.L. . .::::.SHPL:I�:::::.SP:::.:5 :::::.5 E::::.;T ::::::.V....:::::. .::.8:::::1/,:.H.:::::W.: .,.UQ.�:..:FP.,PPR.....RVMP.... ...... ...... .AH.....SH .. .A...... ...... .......... ......... M..... .M. .........)�........A.... ..... ......... . >:� :::»:<::::<::, ::::: �.;;:. ;:.;: :;::.:;.;..�:� �;:;::::�:.;:.;::.;:::<.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.::. ;.:. L:_P STAGE.:PROVI D.ED:>:: :>;>>'�> >:.;::>:>:>;::»:::<:>:>::: : ::::>:::<;::;:>:>:::<::<:<::: .T,OIAL:.:FEES....:S.. .... ... . : ;:: ::::::IOTA......::a...::...::....... ....:....::....:..:......:. ::$... � �,........ . :�� P-DOC'::��:�:�:::�REVISED:;:ASTERA 8/973::;:;: M t� 7 SCHEDULE A2 • - Order No. 396952-5K DESCRIPTION: • PARCEL A: • THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., • IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 01°47'51" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF 1278.87 FEET TO A LINE 48 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE . PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET, SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND RUNS THENCE WESTERLY, IN A STRAIGHT LINE, TO THE.INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 145.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°36'37".EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 670.36 FEET; . THENCE NORTH 01 '23'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 905.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°36'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 664.69 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°35'33" TO A LINE 90 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36: THENCE SOUTH 01 '47'51 " WEST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 795.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°24'28" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: . AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER, ACROSS AND UPON A ' 'STRIP OF LAND 90 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 45 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH. SIDE OF THE 'EAST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT; • EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL A ABOVE. • Page 3 10/29/99 17:45 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS COIF W1 002i002 • PERKINS COTE LLP NOVy 1201 THIRD AVENUE,48TM FLOOR•SEATME,WASHINGTON 98101.3099 t� F` �• �� � - TELEPHONE:206 583.8888•FACSIMILE 206 583.8500 . 1=-_ ; ,;;r: F aa "x`' S�k' I %. �L 47% LORAN.WIETAxER 206-5634584 whitl@perkinscoie. October 29, 1999 • • Lesley Nishihiia Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 Re: Seattle Packaging Land Use Application/Owner's Authorization Dear Lesley: As indicated by signatures below(which may be signed in counterparts), the owners of 1000 Southwest 4ls`Street, Renton, Washington 98055 ("Property"), authorize Jack Alkire (Seattle Packaging contact)and Jay Pickering of Mithun Partners, Inc. (Seattle Packaging agent)to submit land use application to the City of Renton for the Accessory Office Construction Phase of Seattle Packaging's development of the Property. This authorization is conditioned in Seattle Packaging's agreement that construction of the Accessory Office Construction Phase will not commence until Seattle Packaging Inc. holds fee title to the Property. Sincerely, t/titite_ ovki-1714L_L- Laura N. Whitaker PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O THE RREEF FUNDS LEND LEASE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC. By: (see attached) . By: (see attached) Glen R. Scott William G. Williams III, V.P. LNW:smm [23487-0002/SA992940.131] ANCHO&AGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE;RUSSELL&DUMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA 1 d Landlord: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, a joint venture (keitge,:c3;2--. By: William G. Williams III Vice President, Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, Inc., as Advisor to California State Teachers' Retirement System, Venturer 40 By: Glen R. Scott Authorized Representative, RREEF America, L.L.C., as Investment Manager of State of California Public Employees' Retirement System, an agency of the State of California,Venturer . - PERKINS COIE LLP Miry R 1201 THIRD AVENUE, 48?" FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-309 4/44% TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 2 QV '1VF 1 'Q9 / FO • 'Z LAURA N.WHITAKER • JOB //�/ 206-583-8584 CC ' 1'1999 C whitl@perkinscoie. October 29,.1999 Lesley Nishihira Planner .•.'i City of Renton • `"' • Development Services Division P.°',, 0 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Seattle Packaging Land Use Application/Owner's Authorization Dear Lesley: As indicated by signatures below (which may be signed in counterparts), the owners of 1000 Southwest 41st Street, Renton, Washington 98055 ("Property"), authorize Jack Alkire (Seattle Packaging contact) and Jay Pickering of Mithun Partners; Inc. (Seattle Packaging agent) to submit land use application to the City of Renton for the Accessory Office Construction Phase of Seattle Packaging's • development of the Property. This authorization is conditioned in Seattle Packaging's agreement that construction of the Accessory Office Construction Phase will not commence until Seattle Packaging Inc. holds fee title to the Property. Sincerely, biWt- (0b-rf-it/h--,— • Laura N. Whitaker PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O , PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O THE RREEF FUNDS LEND LEASE INC. By: By: , Glen R. Scott • William G. Williams III, V.P. . LNW:smm [23487-0002/S A992940.131] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, 48TH FLOOR•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888:FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 LAURA N.WHITAKER 206-583-8584 • whitl@perkinscoie. • October 22, 1999 Lesley Nishihira Planner OCT 2 5 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division .81 13, 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 • Re: Seattle Packaging Land Use Application/Owner's Authorization Dear Lesley: As indicated by signatures below (which may be signed in counterparts), the owners of 1000 Southwest 41s` Street, Renton, Washington 98055, authorize Jack Alkire (Seattle Packaging contact) and Jay Pickering of Mithun Partners, Inc. (Seattle Packaging agent) to submit land use application for renovation of an existing warehouse building at that address. • Sincerely, zei/141, Laura N. Whitaker • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O THE RREEF FUNDS LEND LEASE INC. By: By: Glen Scott William Williams,.V.P. • • • LNW:smm [23487-0002/SA992940.131] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DUMOULIN, VANCOUVER,CANADA V October 22, 1999 Page 2 bcc: Jack Alkire Jay Pickering [23487-0002/SA992940.131] 10/22/99 10/29/99 17:45 FAX 206 583 8500 PERKINS COTE 002i002 PERKINS COIF LLP - 1201 THIRD AVENUE.48TM FLOOR•SEATTI.E,WASHINGTON 98101.3099 2 1S99 TELEPHONE:206 583-8888•FACSIMILE:206 583-8500 1„. �r�. �'v C^� I I I- t 1 I.-'- LAURAN.WE ra ek 206-5134584 whitl@perkinscoie. October 29, 1999 Lesley Nisliihira GI A I u,- }?. 1 i J ::,i Planner F' '' G ;;� City of Renton Development Services Division a - 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Seattle Packaging Land Use Application/Owner's Authorization Dear Lesley: As indicated by signatures below(which may be signed in counterparts), the owners of 1000 Southwest 41s`Street, Renton, Washington 98055 ("Property"), authorize Jack Alkire (Seattle Packaging contact) and Jay Pickering of Mithun Partners, Inc. (Seattle Packaging agent)to submit land use application to the City of Renton for the Accessory Office Construction Phase of Seattle Packaging's development of the Property. This authorization is conditioned in Seattle Packaging's agreement that construction of the Accessory Office Construction Phase will not commence until Seattle Packaging Inc. holds fee title to the Property. Sincerely, kit/0- 0t1 k1 k. -- Laura N. Whitaker • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/O PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A C/0 THE RREEF FUNDS L-END LEASE INC. LEND LEASE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC. By: (see attached) By: (see attached) Glen R. Scott William G. Williams III, V.P. LNW:smm [7.3487-00021A992940.131] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANL TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE;RUSSELL&DuMOULLN,VANCOUVER,CANADA Landlord: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, a joint venture G�eGu� �By: ,t>, G2 William G. Williams III Vice President, Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, Inc., as Advisor to California State Teachers' Retirement System, Venturer 44°.4.1e45825 By: Glen R. Scott Authorized Representative, RREEF America, L.L.C., as Investment Manager of State of California Public Employees' Retirement System, an agency of the State of California, Venturer MITHUN P ART NERS October 22,1999 Lesley Nishihira-Planner V ,,.. '�City Of Renton V Development Services Division �. ," 1055 South Grady Way % ` Renton,WA 98055 Re: CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton,WA 98055 Renton PreApp No.:99-47 MPI Job No.:99065.00 Dear Lesley: This letter is to accompany the Land Use Application for the Accessory Office Phase for SeaPack Centre. The proposed construction shall have limited impact on the existing site and adjacent properties during the construction of the new building addition. Since the existing conditions of the site and adjacent off-site improvements are fully developed with sidewalks,curbs and gutters,asphalt paving and mature landscaping,the new construction shall not create any significant disturbances requiring unusual construction mitigation measures. Per the City's request,the following information will assist you and your colleagues with your review of the application. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION Proposed construction dates: Start: February 2000. Completion: December 2000. Hours of operation: Typical Hours: 7:00 AM til 5:00 PM Typical Days: Monday-Friday Proposed hauling/transportation routes: Route: Major Arterial Streets-SW 43rd Street,SW 41st Street or Oakedale Avenue SW. ARCHITECTURE P LANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN 4 1 4 OLIVE W A Y S UITE 5 0 0 SEATTLE WA 98101 (2 0 6 1 6 2 3 3 3 4 4 FAX 12061 623 7005 w w w m t t h u n c o m mithun@mithun.coin MITHUN PARTNERS. INC. Construction Mitigation SeaPack Centre Page 2 10/22/99 Measures to be implemented to minimize dust,traffic and transportation impacts,erosion, mud,noise,and other noxious characteristics: Measures for Implementation: Best Management Practices(BMP)shall be used with sediment& erosion controls. Dust Controls: Standard Dust Control measures such as street sweeping,water trucks and wetting down the excavation shall be used. Traffic&Transportation Controls: If necessary,flaggers shall be used at construction entrances/exits to help direct traffic as required. Erosion&Mud Controls: Temporary interceptor dikes&swales,check dams,sediment traps, storm drain inlet protection,and tire wash at construction entrances/exists shall be used. Noise Controls: Hours of construction shall be during typical business hours/days. No piles shall be installed on the project. Other Noxious Characteristics Controls: No materials shall be burned on site. Trash/waste materials shall be contained in dumpsters and removed as required. Litter shall be picked up daily. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling: Special Hours: Schedule or construction techniques do not require special hours. Preliminary traffic control plan: Traffic Plan: No special requirements shall be required due to the adjacency to 3 arterial streets. Flaggers:In necessary,flaggers shall be provided during deliveries at arterial streets for safety. CLOSING The proposed project is a typical construction project to renovate an existing large warehouse. There are no significant construction issues which need to be addressed outside of the ordinary. We look froward to continue working with you on this project. If you have any questions that come up during your review,please contact me Q 206-623-3344 or Laura Whitaker Q Perkins Coie 206-583-8888. Sincerely, Jay icker ,AIA Project Manager cc: L.Whitaker-Perkins Coie J.Alkire-Seattle Packaging Corp. B.Alexander-Edifice Construction J Schramm-Transpo MITHUN PARTNER S October 22,1999 Lesley Nishihira-Planner City Of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: BACKGROUND INFORMATION&PROJECT NARRATIVE Li-I t; - SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton,WA 98055 �•' 1 Renton PreApp No.:99-47 MPI Job No.:99065.00 Dear Lesley: This letter is to accompany the Land Use Application for the Accessory Office Construction Phase for Sea Pack Centre at the existing 371,070 s.f.warehouse at 1000 SW 43rd Street. The user,Seattle Packaging Corp.,is moving and consolidating its production equipment,warehouses and offices from other locations into the former Boeing warehouse. Per the City's request,the following information will assist you and your colleagues with your review of the application. BACKGROUND INFORMATION User Background: Seattle Packaging Corp.is a manufacturer of cardboard boxes. The company receives raw sheets of corrugated cardboard from their suppliers,which is run through printing and die-cutting presses to create the boxes. The individual boxes are then bundled onto 4'x4'wood pallets and stacked in the warehouse portions of the building before shipping. The warehouse portions of the building will use high pile storage of the palleted boxes before shipping out the finished product to their clients. Existing Warehouse Building Summary: • Year Built:1978 • Size:371,070 s.f. 1-story warehouse • Zoning: IM- Industrial Medium(formerly MP) • Type of Construction:V-N Sprinkled • Occupancy:Group S(formerly B2) • Parking:269 spaces ARCHITECTURE • LANNING & INTERIOR DESIGN 4 1 4 OLIVE W A Y SUITE 5 0 0 SEATTLE WA 98101 ( 206 ) 6 2 3 3 3 4 4 FAX (206) 623 7005 w w w,m t I h u n,c o m m i t h u n@ m i l h u n.c o m MITHUN PARTNERS. INC Background Info&Project Narrauve SeaPack Centre Page 2 10/22/99 Schedule: Because of the need to maintain existing operations,Seattle Packing Corp.is making improvements and moving into the building under a three phased schedule. This application is for the third phase of construction. 1. Warehouse Upgrade Phase: Upgrade warehouse for high pile storage and install 1 or 2 pieces of production equipment.This phase has been permitted and construction is complete. May 1999 to September 1999. 2. Manufacturing/Production Upgrade Phase:Renovate existing building with dock levelers, seismic bracing and install multiple pieces of equipment and automated conveyor system for full production capabilities. February 2000 to May 2000. 3. Accessory Offices Construction Phase:Renovate building with new 2-story office addition, production area offices and infill a portion of the RR spur. February 2000 to December 2000. Scope of Work for Accessory Offices Construction Phase: • The proposal is to construct new accessory offices to the warehouse/manufacturing in a 2- story building adjacent to the south side of the existing building with approximately 19,000 s.f.on each floor; • Approximately 6,000 s.f.of new accessory offices shall be built within the existing warehouse at employee entrances and contiguous to the Pt Floor of the new 2-story addition; • Parking stalls in the south parking lot shall be relocated to the east,north and west sides of the building. The proposed parking total shall be 245 stalls; • Landscaping areas on the south and west sides shall be removed,then relocated at a 1-for-1 ratio to new planter areas adjacent to newly created parking stalls and building entries; • The site and building is currently being short platted under a separate land use action. (File No.LUA-99-103,SHPL-A) PROJECT NARRATIVE Project name,size&location of site: SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton WA 98055 Lot Size:Approx.668,500 SF. Existing Warehouse Size: Approx.371,070 GSF. Proposed New 2-Story Accessory Office Addition Size: Approx.38,100 GSF. Proposed Total Warehouse&Manufacturing w/ Access.Office Size: Approx.409,170 GSF. Proposed Total Building Footprint Size: Approx.389,748 GSF. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties: Site:IM-Medium Industrial. Adjacent Properties: IM-Medium Industrial to the north and east,CA-Commercial Arterial to the west.City of Tukwila to the south. Current use of the site and any existing improvements: Use: Warehouse. Special site features: Features: Northwest corner of site is in Shoreline Boundary for Springbrook Creek. Background Info&Project Narrative SeaPack Centre Page 3 10/22/99 Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: Site Designation: Seismic Sensitive. Soil: The soil under the site is layers of silts and sands which is prone to liquefaction. Fill: The existing warehouse is built upon 4 to 6 feet of fill. Drainage: Existing drainage is controlled by drainlines for the roof drainlines and parking catch basins. Soils Info: See attached Soil Reports for specifics. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development: Height Existing- Approx.26'-6";Proposed- Approx.36'-6". Square Footage: Existing- Approx.371,070 GSF;Proposed-Approx.409,170 GSF. Lot Coverage: Existing-Approx.605,924 SF;Proposed-Approx.604,337 SF. Parking: Existing-269 stalls;Proposed-245 stalls. A request for parking modification is part of this application. See attached form and parking study for specifics. Access: No change to existing 6 curbcuts. Proposed off-site improvements: Sidewalks: No change to existing. Fire Hydrants: No change to existing. Sewer Main: No change to existing. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Estimated CC: $5 million. Fair Market Value: Not known. Estimated quantities and type of material involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Pre-loading Material: Not known yet, approx.3000 CY of temporary fill. Fill or Excavation Material: Minimal as required for slab on existing grade. Number,type and size of trees to be removed: Number Trees Removed: Approx.42 trees. Type: Deciduous and evergreen. Size: Approx.6" to 8"caliper. Number Trees Proposed: Approx.64 trees. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City. Dedication:None. CLOSING The project is a multi-phased project to renovate an existing large warehouse. Seattle Packaging and the design team will work closely with you to make sure the project moves ahead as quickly as possible. We are committed to having regularly scheduled meetings and daily phone communication to assure the Renton permitting process moves smoothly and quickly. Background Info&Project Narrative SeaPack Centre Page 4 10/22/99 You have been a great help in preparing the application and we look forward to continue working with you. If you have any questions that come up during your review,please contact me Q 206-623-3344 or Laura Whitaker @ Perkins Coie 206-583-8888. Sincerely, Jay Pic ring,AI Proj Maria cc: L.Whitaker-Perkins Coie J.Alkire-Seattle Packaging Corp. B.Alexander-Edifice Construction J Schramm-Transpo I _ SeaPack(Centre 1000 SW 43rd Street Renton,WA • City of Renton ,i Z°"o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can bi done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: - I This Environmental Checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Page 1 of 22 . I USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non-project proposals even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For no -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project, "applicant," and "p loperty or site," should be read as "Proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: SeaPack Centre 1000 SW 43`d Street Renton, WA 98055 2. Name of Applicant: Owner: • Seattle Packaging Corp. 3701 South Norfolk Seattle, WA 98118 Contact: Jack Alkire - (206) 725-3000 I Email:jalkire@seapkg.com 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Architect: Mithun Partners, Inc. 414 Olive Way, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Contact: Jay Pickering - (206) 623-3344 Email: JayP@Mithun.com I 4. Date checklist prepared: October 22, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Page 2 of 22 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Warehouse Upgrade Phase: Started May 1999 Warehouse Renovation& 1 Piece of Equipment Installation. Warehouse Upgrade Phase: Completed September 1999 Warehouse Renovation& 1 Piece of Equipment Installation. Manufacturing/Production Upgrade Phase: Start February 2000 Warehouse Renovation&Multiple Pieces of Equipment Installation. Manufacturing/Production Upgrade Phase: Complete May 2000 (Warehouse Renovation&Multiple Pieces of Equipment Installation. Accessory Office Construction Phase: Start February 2000 Office Addition, RR Spur Addition&Office Tenant Improvements in Warehouse. Accessory Office Construction Phase: Complete December 2000 Office Addition, RR Spur Addition&Office Tenant Improvements in Warehouse. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Activity related to this proposal includes the following: Also, see response to question 6 above. Warehouse Upgrade Phase: Recently completed construction. Installation of 1 piece of production equipment. Beginning to use warehouse for high pile storage after sprinkler system upgraded. Manufacturing/Production Upgrade Phase: Install remaining pieces of production equipment. Install dock leveler equipment and production conveyor systems. Reach full operation of manufacturing &warehouse. Accessory Office Construction Phase: Install new accessory offices in new addition beside existing warehouse building. Install new warehouse infill addition at RR spur beside existing warehouse building. Install new accessory offices inside existing warehouse building. Page 3 of 22 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical/Soils Reports: Dames & Moore 3/15/78; Zipper Zeman Associates 5/20/99; Zipper Zeman Associates 6/9/99; Zipper Zeman Associates 10/22/99. • Parking Study: The Transpo Group 10/18/99. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. Short Plat Application - File No. LUA-99-103, SHPL -A. IlCurrently under review by City of Renton. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal if 'known. City of Renton Land Use Permit Administrative Site Plan Approval Environmental (SEPA) Review Parking Modification Request City of Renton Construction Permits To be submitted at future date Page 4 of 22 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is the renovation of an existing 371,070 Gross SF warehouse on an approximately 666,500 SF site. The proposed renovation includes the construction of approximately 51,500 Gross SF of new accessory Offices beside and within the existing warehouse and an addition of approximately 3,850 Gross SF of new warehouse. The surrounding surface parking lot shall include 245 striped stalls, Existing parking is approximately 269 stalls. Through a Parking Modification Request, 245 parking stalls shall be provided as determined by user demand. See Transpo Group's Parking Report, dated 10/18/99. Approximately 11,700 square feet of existing landscape area shall be removed and replaced with 12,100 square feet of new landscaping at parking areas and pedestrian plaza areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). The proposal is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW (1000 SW 43rd Street). B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains, other: The site is a flat, previously developed rectangular parcel with portions landscaped. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1% Page 5 of 22 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Imported fill over silty sand and sandy silt: See Geotechnical/Soils Reports. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No surface indications. Area is designated a Seismic Sensitive Area by the City of Renton. See Geotechnical/Soils Reports for more details regarding subsurface conditions. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Construction will include minimal filling and grading for new building addition. Approximately 3000 CY of soil may be used to pre-load the south portion of the site to • prepare existing earth/grade for the weight of the new building addition. The pre-load soil will then be removed. Source of pre- load soil not yet identified. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Possibly, to a limited extent, during construction. Such erosion will be controlled using Best Management Practices (BMP), including a construction phase temporary sediment & erosion control plan. Page 6 of 22 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No significant change. Approximately 93% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction - B.M.P. plan with sediment&erosion control, including temporary interceptor dike &swale, check dams, sediment trap, storm drain inlet protection, and tire wash at construction entrance. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction activity will produce some • emissions to the air. During operation, emissions shall.be produced by company trucks, employee's and guest's vehicles. Quantities are not known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: • Dust control during construction will be implemented. Page 7 of 22 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface waterbody on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- • round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetland)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook Creek 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or • adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. Existing building and proposed building addition are greater than 200 feet distance from the ordinary high water mark of Springbrook Creek. See Survey. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of the fill material. N.A. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. Page.8 of 22 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of water materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of water and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...,agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. Page 9 of 22 l � ' I c. Water runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other water? If so describe. Existing catch basins collect storm water from parking areas. Existing drainlines collect storm water from roof. The proposed project shall require no significant change to existing on-site systems. Proposed new work shall be connected to existing on-site systems. Existing on-site systems are then connected to established METRO storm water systems. Final location of water runoff/flow is controlled by METRO. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. • No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Maintain existing and install new storm water catch basins and drainlines connected to existing systems. Page 10 of 22 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alter, maple,,aspen, other x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass I pasture ., crop or grain I wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing site vegetation at proposed new construction will be displaced and relocated to other areas of site. New vegetation/planting areas will be added adjacent to existing vegetation/planting areas and at new parking areas and pedestrian plaza areas. Landscaping/vegetation shall be replaced 1- for-1 per City of Renton Development Regulations. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed planting includes: New native deciduous and conifer trees and shrubs adjacent to building and within the parking and pedestrian plaza areas. Page 11 of 22 • 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, • other: None noted. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ' None noted. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Site is in the Pacific Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Existing and proposed new trees within the site may provide refuge for wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical power for lighting, cooling and production equipment. Natural gas for heating. Page 12 of 22 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: High efficiency lighting supplemented with natural day-lighting. Architectural roof features shall be used to capture natural day-lighting. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemical, risk of fire and explosions, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Small quantities of cleaning solutions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. If discovered, any existing hazardous material identified within the facility shall be removed and disposed of per jurisdictional requirements. No services anticipated. I � Page 13 of 22 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Any existing hazardous material identified will be removed and disposed of per jurisdictional requirements. Proposed production equipment uses water based inks. Equipment has capture and containment sumps. Materials are then disposed in compliance with METRO requirements. I . Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other?) Existing traffic noise occurs from SW 43rd Street, SW 41'Street and Oakedale Avenue SW. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise during normal work hours. Vehicle movement during operation of the facility. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limit construction activity to normal hours for such activity. • Page 14 of 22 • 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial warehouse storage and surface parking currently on the site. Commercial warehouse and surface parking to the east. Commercial retail and surface parking to the west. Commercial retail and surface parking to the south. Commercial warehouse and surface parking to the north. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so describe. No. . Describe any structures on the site. One story concrete tilt-up warehouse with loading docks and surface parking lots around building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so what? A very small portion of the existing warehouse will be demolished to allow for construction of new accessory offices and employee entrances on south, east and west sides of building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM - Industrial Medium. . What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? I . Employment Area -Valley • Page 15 of 22 • g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Critical Area -Seismic Sensitive Shoreline - NW corner of site is within 200' boundary from Springbrook Creek it Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? At move in, approximately 150 people would work at the site during peak operating times. The projected maximum number of people for the facility in the long-term future is approximately 220- 235 people (during peak operating times). j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I�I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: City of Renton Development Regulations Review Process. The project has been reviewed at a Pre-Application meeting and subsequent updates with planning staff prior to submittal. I _ Page 16 of 22 9. Housing . Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. • None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N.A. 1.0. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. • Existing structure is approximately 26'-6" above grade. Proposed renovation addition shall be approximately 38'-0"above grade to the top of the roof features which is consistent with City of Renton requirements. Existing principal building materials: tilt-up concrete. Proposed principal building materials: stucco, stone tile and glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No significant impact on territorial views, no obstruction. Page 17 of 22 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts if any: Proposed development will provide new trees and landscaping at south, east and west facades of building at proposed new offices/entries. Pedestrian plazas will be included at proposed new building entries. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal change at exterior lighting at night. Minimal glare from window reflection except at noon during the low sun angle winter solstice from proposed new south-facing glass windows at offices. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with view? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Off-site illumination will be controlled by the selection of shielded lighting fixtures. Glare shall be controlled with low reflective colors and materials on the proposed building. Page 18 of 22 I . 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Springbrook Creek. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Proposed new offices may have an exercise Workout Room. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. General describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site: Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. Page 19 of 22 e! Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No.f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project would not create significantly additional vehicular trips compared to the existing facility. Peak time would be at 4:00 to 5:00 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. No change from existing conditions. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, school, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. Page 21 of 22 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, ' telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: communications. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All required utilities are adjacent and available to the site. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent/Aftp4ieant Mi kW P4 erz-5 fA4.. • Date Submitted: / /2*j 7'7 Receipt# Filing Fee $ Page22of22 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888•FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 October 22, 1999 Lesley Nishihira Ca, > A,n Planner :. ro 0 FF ir, City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: SeaPack Centre/Parking Modification Request Dear Lesley: As described in the "Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building" (October 18, 1999) prepared by The Transpo Group ("Transpo"), Seattle Packaging Corporation ("SeaPack") proposes to consolidate its packaging operations into an existing warehouse building ("Building") located on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street in Renton. SeaPack's use of the Building will require its renovation to include manufacturing and office space in addition to the existing warehouse use. On-site surface parking will be provided, totaling 245 striped parking stalls. This letter is a request for modification of applicable City Code requirements for minimum parking stall quantity. Request for Modification of Parking Stall Requirements As noted above, the SeaPack project includes 245 striped parking stalls. The Parking Study notes that the renovated Building requires a minimum of 310 parking stalls under City Code. Therefore, the project contains 65 fewer stalls than required by Code. City Code authorizes the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to authorize a modification from minimum/maximum parking requirements (RMC 4-4- 080(F)(11.0)d, e). Such modifications must be based on criteria set forth at RMC 4-9- 250(D)(2). The criteria and the bases for the project's conformance with them are set forth below. [23487-0002/SB992950.240] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON,D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER,CANADA October 22, 1999 Page 2 1. A specific reason makes the strict letter of the Code impractical. The Building renovation will entail alteration of an existing warehouse and associated surface parking lot. Alterations necessary to meet the developer's program requirements will result in removal of some stalls. For this reasons, the strict letter of the Code with respect to minimum parking requirements is impractical. 2. The modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Code. The Code's on site parking requirements are intended to eliminate parking impacts on surrounding properties. As the Traffic Study demonstrates, at full employment the SeaPack project will utilize less than the 245 stalls provided. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the interest and purpose of the Code. In particular, the existing side contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. 3. The modification: a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability [23487-0002/SB992950.240] 10/22/99 October 22, 1999 Page 3 intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. c. [Will] conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Please see response to criterion 2, above. e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Please see response to criterion 2, above. Thank you for your consideration of this modification request. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. V ry truly yours,J )/ Laura N. Whitaker LNW:bs cc: Jack Alkire Jay Pickering [23487-0002%SB992950.240] 10/22/99 PARKING STUDY for SeaPack Centre Building • Renton, WA Prepared for: Seattle Packaging Corporation and Mithun Partners October 18, 1999 Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc, 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 (425) 821-3665 FAX: (425) 825-8434 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Overview and Study Purpose 1 Study Results 1 EXISTING BUILDING 2 .. • Description • - 2 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 2 Conclusion 2 PROJECT PROPOSAL 3 Description 3 City of Renton Parking Code Requirements 3 Parking Demand for the Building 4 Conclusion 4 TRUCK IMPACTS 5 Parking Study for SeaPack Juilding October 18, 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I Overview and Study Purpose This study documents the parking impacts of the proposal SeaPack Centre project. Both employee parking impacts and impacts to truck delivery vehicles are identified. The purpose of the parking study is to evaluate the parking requirements of the existing site and to evaluate the impacts of the proposed project,which includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building("Building")which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot(gsf)structure,3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur,and 38,100 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas,the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nisf)of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. The Building is located.on the northeast corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43`d Street in Renton. This report is separated into three distinct areas. The first identifies the parking requirements of the existing site, which contains a 363,150 nsf warehouse. The second evaluates the parking requirements of the proposed Building. The third area evaluates the project's impact to truck deliveries and access. The formal Land Use submittal,which will include a copy of the existing site plan and the proposed Building plan, is currently scheduled for October 25, 1999. I Study Results Parking Impacts of Existing Site. The parking study demonstrates that the existing parking supply of 269 striped stalls exceeds the City's parking code requirement of 242 stalls for the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. Parking Impacts of the Proposal. The future proposed parking supply of 245 stalls is 65 stalls less than the City's parking code requirement of 310 stalls for the expanded Building, which would contain warehouse and manufacturing operations. As such, a modification to the City's parking code requirement is requested such that parking on the site only be provided to accommodate the projected future employee parking demands of the proposed SeaPack Centre Building. Truck I pacts. Parking stalls are not recommended in directly line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side iof the Building so that the entire 104-foot depth can be used for truck maneuvering. • I � c M.•I99199295IWPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 1999 Page 1 . Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 • EXISTING BUILDING Description The existing building, which contains 363,150 net square feet (nsf) of area, will be used by Seattle Packaging Corporation to consolidate some of its manufacturing and warehousing operations. Employees and trucks are expected to use the existing driveways for access to and from the site. The existing parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls, which includes stalls on the north side of the Building in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. I ' City of Renton Parking Code Requirements Section 4-4-080 (Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations) of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parking requirements for the existing building. The City's parking requirements for warehouse space is 1 staff for every 1,500 nsf of building area. Since the existing building has 363,150 nsf, a total of 242 parking stalls are required. Conclusion The existing site parking lot has 269 striped parking stalls. The use of the existing building as a warehouse would require a minimum of 242 parking stalls according to City Code. Since the existing parking supply exceeds the City's minimum requirement of 242 stalls, no additional parking would be required to serve the existing warehouse. Thus, for the creation of an individual parcel, the existing on-site parking supply meets the City's Code for the existing warehouse. c M:199199295IWPIREPORT3.D0C ©The TRANSPO,Group,Inc.1999 Page 2 y I Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 I . PROJECT PROPOSAL Description The proposal includes the consolidation of Seattle Packaging operations into an expanded building ("Building") which is comprised of the existing 371,070 gross square foot (gsf) structure, 3,840 gsf of infill for the railroad spur, and 38,100 gsf of addition area. The total Building size would be 413,010 gsf. Subtracting the common areas, the net usable size of the Building would be 388,907 nsf. Note also that about seven percent (27,782 nsf) of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. • The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stalls would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. The parking on the north side of the Building includes spaces in front of dock doors that will be permanently closed. City of Renton Parking Code Requirements Section 4-4-080 of the City of Renton Land Use Code was referenced to determine the parking requirements for the Seapack Centre proposal. The table shown below summarizes the parking requirements of the site based on City code and the planned use of the building. Note that the net square footage (nsf) of the manufacturing space includes 27,782 nsf of office space (about 7 percent of the total nsf of the Building), which would support both the manufacturing the warehousing operations. Parking rates for manufacturing and warehousing uses typically allow foIr about 5 to 15 percent of the total building space to be used by ancillary office uses to support the primary operations. Since the 7 percent office space for the Building falls at the lower end of this range, the parking required to support the primary operations (manufacturing and warehousing) and the supporting operation (office) would be sufficient to accommodate both. Use Size(nsf) City Code Requirement No.Stalls Required Manufacturing* 150,971 nsf 1 stall per 1,000 nsf 151 Warehousing 237,936 nsf 1 stall per 1,500 nsf 159 Total 388,907 nsf 310 Includes 27,782 nsf of office space to support the manufacturing and warehousing operations,which is 7%of total nsf. According to City Code, the SeaPack Centre proposal would be required to provide 310 parking stalls to serve the Building's manufacturing and warehousing uses, which is 65 more than proposed. Approval of the proposal, then, will require a parking modification. M:1991992951 WPIREPORT3.DOC ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 3 Parking Study for SeaPack Centre Building October 18, 1999 Parking Demand for the Building To estimate the parking demand of the proposal, the parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were determined separately. This was done for both the existing employment levels and the future projected employment of the Building at full buildout. Note also that about seven percent of the net square footage would be used for ancillary office space to support the primary manufacturing and warehousing operations. Existing employment levels reflect the use of the Building in the year 2000. Future buildout of the project would occur after about ten years, and would result in maximum employment levels for the Building. Existing Employment. The existing parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses was determined based on the,current employment levels of each use, as provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. Using the existing employment data, the hourly parking demands were determined for each use based on the various shifts and support staff serving them. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 161 vehicles. Future Employment. Future employment levels were estimated according to projections provided by Seattle Packaging Corporation. They expect 40 percent growth in manufacturing and 75 percent growth in warehousing. Using these future employment projections, the hourly parking demand for each use was determined. The highest parking demand occurs between 4:00 and 5:00 p.m., with a peak parking demand of 229 vehicles. Conclusion The existing site contains 269 striped parking stalls. The proposed use of the Building would eliminate 66 stalls on the south side of the site and 6 stalls on the west side, but 47 new stills would be added to east side and 1 to the north side, for a future total of 245 striped parking stalls. Hourly parking demand for the manufacturing and warehousing uses were compared with the parking supply to determine the parking utilization for both existing and future employment levels. The comparison indicates that the 245-stall parking supply would accommodate demand throughout a typical weekday with future projected employment levels in the Building. The peak utilization of about 93 to 94 percent would occur between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. on typical weekdays. If Seattle Packaging were to reach full employment, the Building would be at full production capacity. As a result, additional warehousing and/or manufacturing space would need to be acquired in another location. Thus, the projected employment levels are not expected to exceed those studied for this site. M:1991992951WPIREPORT3.000 ©The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 1999 Page 4 Parking Study for SeaPack Ce;;.; Building October 18, 1999 TRUCK IMPACTS Section 44-080-J4 of the City of Renton Land Use Code identifies a minimum 100-foot back-out distance for trucks at dock-in loadings. The current distance from the west edge of the existing building to the west property line is 104 feet,which exceeds the City's requirement for back-out distance. However, currently parking stalls are striped along the property line such that less than 90 feet of back-out distance is available for delivery truck maneuvering. As a result,delivery trucks that currently use the loading docks on the west side of the existing building are not in conformance with current City Code. With the project proposal,the existing loading docks on the west side of the Building would remain, and six additional double-wide dock doors are proposed. Seattle Packaging uses the following three types of trucks or truck/trailer combinations for deliveries: 1. Large combinations with a 16-foot truck and 48-foot trailer(64-feet total). 2. Medium size combinations with a 16-foot truck and 32-foot trailer(48-feet total). 3. Small box truck with a 12-foot truck and 28-foot trailer(40-feet total). Due to the need for additional parking stalls on the site to accommodate future employment levels,additional parking stalls were initially identified along some of the area on the west site property line adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue SW. With standard 20-foot long parking stalls,about 84 feet of depth(104 feet existing less 20-foot long parking stall)would be available for truck maneuvering at those dock doors directly in-line with the parking stalls along the west property line. Based on typical turning radii of 41 to 45 feet for a WB-50 truck(50 feet in total length),the entire 104 feet of existing depth would be needed to accommodate back-in and pull-out truck maneuvers. As such,it is recommended that the existing parking stalls be removed and no additional parking stalls allowed in directly line of the existing or new dock doors on the west side of the Building so that the entire 104-foot depth canibe used for truck maneuvering. M:199199295IWPIREPORT3DOC ©The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 1999 Page 5 PI • • • •. • • • • MEMORANDUM • •• mEGII.;.)vEu! • DATE: . MAY 2 8 1998 TO: Long Range Planning AND STRATEele PLANNINE1 FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director #17 SUBJECT: &°e1-4 New Preliminary Application: 6 PaCe772 Ceml-re LOCATION: /a; 4./L5Iii 61rC6r PREAPP NO. 19 -11 • • Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. • Please suibmit your written comments to no later than • 1-Ovito . Thank you. • • We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the.applicant. t a6C; /),-/ 6 11//9 0 ecvk, zrVeS 4/414;) 0 • 77, D• • • preapp • PROJECT# . . I . • FILE DIV# °14- • MEMORANDU11 °' 0,9 ono • wo4„ DATE: 5- 28-- TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project-Planner . FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: LOCATION:. /2 .6/k• SCU 43`4LS PREAPP NO. a9 -41 . A meeting iwith the applicant has been scheduled for .A:00 PM , Thursday, /One /7 , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to.prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. . . Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. !You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this.time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to ./-ea . • at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. SE,�cous " " FL- Cc-TES RE64-12,0t 4-LLo )ABsLIr' UNDER .rt-iH U N/Poi cc-1 e c. r L U 1,1 E o D S o k /F co NS Tln T`(P GI-f�-�yE j co juP1 icT w I-t-c-1 VNL1t't IT5 () 4P i4c • oPFST ND YD.d No T t1 iNTA•r t`J • igG OSc>/e. tr R&'QuiREi t6:NTS • s ki: cc31Lrrac) R EcS4‘..2 “2 10. r-r•OR ATP.I • Preapp2 I V W 1. ��Y o a .; ,CI1TY OF RENTON r. o .FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �` ' . MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3, 1999 . TO: Lesley Nishihara, Assistant Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector . . SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Seattle.Packaging Center 1. . The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of. building addition only: 42,467 square feet x $0.52 = $22,082.84 . . This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. • 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the stru'ctu re. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure, both new and existing. CT:ct • seapack . • • CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM PATE: June 16, 1999 • TO: Lesley Nishihira Az4.4,defe,frnike47— FROM: Paul LunThert • SUBJECT: Seattle.Packaging Center - Preliminary Application • Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained in This Report: The followi g comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is.cautionedj that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment J Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. 0 Sanitary Sewer: • The site is served by existing sewer main on the south side of the building. If no new • - connections to the sewer system are proposed then no side sewer permits will be required. Water: - rr,,��V',,,, ,I /tit-- The site is served by existing water mains as follows: Y /d)jO 1k) cJo ti 774 PA-h./e--/e>4, 1 . 12" located in Oakesdale Ave SW Ti 12" located in SW 41 st (St. t 7U • v t 3. 12" located in SW 43rd St. / 4. 12" in City held easement at the eastside of the building. t-c/I -0. • • Axle 16, 1999 • . Page 2 . • Any additional water main, fire hydrants or fire control system must meet current Fire Codes and Regulations. If no increase in water system is proposed (meters,.hydrants, fire control) then no water permits will be required. . Storm: The site is served by existing storm systems in 0akesdale Av. SW, SW 41' St., and SW'43`d St., if no increase in impervious surface is proposed by the project on-site then no permit for storm water will be required. . • Road Improvements: . The site has existing curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and streetlights on all street frontages. If new driveways are proposed they need to be installed by current City Standards. General: S Construction permit fees will 'be required for construction of water mains, side sewer, and storm drainage system and street improvements. The cost of permits are as follows: The first $100,000 is at 5% of the cost,of the construction, the second from $100,000 to $200,000 is at 4% of the cost and the third all the amount over $200,000 is at 3% of the cost. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and off/on site utility and street improvement construction review. The remainder shall be paid when the permits are issued. seapak , CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works • MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 1999 . TO: Pre-Application File No. 99-47043 FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Assistant Planner, x7270V . SUBJECT: Seattle Packaging Center We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers(e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged ito review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. General: The proposal is to construct an additional 42,467 square feet within and outside'of the existing warehouse structure on the NE corner of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 43`d Street (1000 block of SW 43rd Street). Included with the proposal is the addition of 131 parking spaces. The proposed use of the site is for the manufacturing, processing, assembly,and storage of cardboard boxes. 2. Zoning%Development Standards: The subject site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM). The proposed use is considered an outright permitted use in this zoning designation. The IM zone requires a 20 foot setback from street property lines and no setback on rear or side yards—which the additions appear to satisfy. The IM development standards do not restrict building height or lot coverage. Although current landscape requirements require a minimum landscape width of 15 feet along streets,the site will not be required to bring the existing landscape strips into compliance;unless modifications to these areas are proposed. The parking regulations require a specific number of spaces based on the amount of square feet dedicated to a specific use. For this project the following ratios will be applicable: • • i a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area dedicated to office use • a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area dedicated to manufacturing use • ; 1 space per 1,500 square feet of floor area dedicated to warehouse use The site plan submitted with the formal application will need to include a detailed parking analysis. The analysis should list the number of parking spaces required based on the square footage of each use on the site. The analysis will need to establish the number of spaces existing on site, broken down by stall type (e.g., standard, compact, ADA) and the number of spaces proposed. The proposed addition is less than a 1/3rd increase in building area. Therefore,the current parking standards do not apply to the existing parking areas. All new proposed parking, however, must meet minimum standards—such as stall dimensions, aisle widths, and landscaping. The site plan will also need to provide stall dimensions and aisle widths for any new parking areas. Pre99471 • 3. Application Requirements: The proposal will require Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The land use permits can be reviewed.concurrently in an estimated timeframe of 6 to$weeks. An application fee of$1,500 plus postage for notification to surrounding property owners will be required. Please see the attached handouts for more detailed information regarding submittal requirements. The project site is located within a close proximity to Springbrook Creek. A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may be required if any of the proposed work is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of the creek. The shoreline permit requires a public hearing as well as • additional fees and submittal.requirements. If it is determined that this permit is necessary, please • • contact staff for further information. , The site plan and neighborhood detail map submitted for the formal application will need to include the entire site boundary as well as the ground floor square footage of all existing structures. In addition to this overall site plan, a detail for the project area would be appropriate. We highly encourage the applicant to submit one set of plans for a pre-screening prior to making additional copies. . 4. impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees,the following mitigation fees may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • • A Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. . C: Jennifer Henning, Principle Planner • • • Pre99471 • • • . • . • . . . . • • ! . • . •..... . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION,. . • • • WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR.LAND USE • • • • . . • . .APPLICATIONS P.PRBMI-VS V 81MITTAI.P.1:....;e: .11WAIV.Eb1,.1i- ;I'M 0 D I El REQUIREMENTSBY BY Calculations; Surveyi ....• . Drainage Control PIan2 1 Drainage Report 2 ' *.* • • Elevations,.Grading 2Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 • • • •• • • • • . ••••••• ••••• •.... ••••• • , .• • . . • . • Existing Eaements (Recorded Copy) 4 • Flood Plain Map, if appllcable4 t41i'J Floor Pl.ans 3 AND 4 Gseciteafiiitabt • Grading nen, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 nimiggiong King dolir4iy Assessoes.Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping PIari, Conceptual4 . . . • Legal Desd.ription 4 1...it:..0f:54ti!pyrlding;RrbppaY.Pmi6ers 4 • •::* :•: • :f• •• Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of ExiSting•SiteI,cpoitkorA4 . .................................................................................................................................. Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping • Analysis 4 • • • . . r . • .. . Plan Reductions A .% .•• •. ..•. .•. : : . . •.•••• ..•• • • • • Postage 4! • Public WrksApproval Letter 2 • Title Repbrt or Plat-Certificate 4 • • Topography Map (51•contours)3 . .• •••• • •••• • . • : ..•:.:,• •• Traffic Study 2 JA, Tree cutingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 • • Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 • Wetland Delineation M a p 4 • (11114J Wetland S Planting Plan 2 1At44 ) 11V/A . Wetland 0 Study.: andi This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section • PROJECT NAME: 5. 1\-- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: (0/1.1 iqe/ 4. Development Planning Section - i t 'f , •1%/111 : :: ±L• f { ;J To: Lesley Nishihira-Assistant Planner Date: 4 November,1999 Projects'`,-99065.00 Development Services Division O N9-- cc,.:).' City of Renton ,-,r ' ' Renton City Hall-6th Floor i' _ y"" 1055 South Grady Way k° `t,, i'lf-' Renton,WA 98055 ('S� (425)430-7270 `' I From: Jay Pickering,AIA cc: Jack Alkire-Seattle Packaging Corp. Re: SEAPACK CENTRE- PHASE 3 1000 SW 43rd Street,Renton I We are sending you the following: x Attached Under separate cover Other For your: x Information x Review&comment As requested ENCLOSED: • 11 Copies+1 Original-Completed Master Application form with notarized signature,dated 10/27/99 and with attached Letter of Authorization from current property owner,dated 10/29/99. • 5 Copies-'Title Report(includes all attachments and addenda). • 12 Copies Environmental Checklist with signature,dated 10/22/99. • 2 Sets-Mailing labels for surrounding property owners. • 2 Copies-List of surrounding property owners with notarized signature,dated 10/26/99. • 1 business check for$1500 from Seattle Packaging Corp+cash for mailing postage(TBD). • 5 Copies- Pre-application Meeting Summary,dated 5/28/99. • 4 Copies+1 original-Waiver of Submittal Requirements form with signatures,dated 6/17/99. • 11 Copies I+1 original-Background Information&Project Narrative,dated 10/22/99. • 4 Copies 1 Original-Construction Mitigation Description,dated 10/22/99. • 12 Sets/Copies-30"x 42" Drawings/Sheets which include Neighborhood Detail Map;Site Plan; Parking Lot Coverage/Landscaping Analysis;Architectural Elevations;Grading Elevations;Utilities Plan;Drainage Control Plan;Conceptual Landscaping Plan;Tree Cutting/Inventory Plan; and Floor Plans,dated 10/21/99&10/25/99. Drawings grouped by sheet/page and un-stapled. • 1 Set/Copy-Colored 30"x 42"Display Maps of Neighborhood Plan;Site Plan;Landscaping Plans; and Building Elevations,dated 10/21/99&10/25/99. • 1 Copy+1 Original-Reduced 81/2" x 11"PMT drawings of drawings set noted above,dated 10/21/991&10/25/99. • 5 Copies-iParking Study report,dated 10/18/99. • 4 Copies+1 original-Letter for Parking Modification Request,dated 10/22/99. • 5 Copies-IGeotechnical/Soils Reports.,dated 3/15/78,5/20/99,6/9/99&10/22/99. Lesley- I Per the Submittal Requirements,we are pleased to present this Application for Land Use Approvals on behalf of Seattle Packaging Corp. As you and your colleagues review the documents and you encounter questions,please do not hesitate to call me @ 206-623-3344 or Laura Whitaker @ Perkins Coie 206-583- 8584. I Mithun Partners,Inc. 414 Olive Ways Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98101 (206)623-3344/FAX(206)623-7005 • • . • . •• • • • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE • • • . APPLICATIONS • LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED c M ............................ REQUIREMENTS BY BY M ENTS Calculations, Surveyi Drainage Control Plan 2 J 1• Drainage Report 2 (• • EleVatibri8Aithit00t0( 1.3AND.4, Elevations,.Grading 2 . _ - ". .;'. • .• Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 • Existing Eaements (Recorded Copy) 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 . GeOteohrill Grading Plan, Conceptual2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessoes.Map Indicating Site 4Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 • ...:..•.. Legal DesCription 4 • List of Surrounding Property.00)§ts 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 . Map of EXiSting-s-Sitk:COnditiOns 4. • ... •• . . . . . . . . ....... . ........ Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) Parking, LOt Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 . • Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 • • •. •• •• Postage kk.. _ Public Works Approval Letter2 °"" . Title Report or Plat-Certificate 4 qfl " Topography Map (5 contours)3 •/ • : .4.AsbT7:,•\"' • • Traffic StUdy 2 )dke . . . Tree CuttihgNeoetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Pian, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 U1J Wetlands1Planting Plan 4 01/14\ VA VVetlandsStudy, IA/0 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: S. --tok—laikr,V.... 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: (Pif /q/ 4 Develppment Planning Section - Zipper Zeman Associates, c� Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants;' _..._ J-388-02 October 22, 1999 Seattle Packaging ; c/o Mithun Partners, Inc. 339 414 Olive Way, Suite-500 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Jay Pickering, AIA 6 ayd'i! d Subjec Summary of Geotechnical Evaluation , Proposed SEAPACK Centre Addition—Phase 3 1000 SW 43`d Street ; ;V r • Renton, Washington `�' v' Dear Mr. Pickering: IIn accordance with your request, this letter presents a summary of the geologic conditions encountered at the site, to date, during our subsurface exploration program. To date, three Dutch cone probes have been completed. A fourth cone probe and a single mud-rotary boring is scheduled for completion the week of October 25, 1999. The subsurface conditions encountered at the site are, in our opinion, representative of the local geologic conditions in the project vicinity. In general, the Dutch cone probes encountered approximately 1 to 2 feet of dense, man-placed structural fill over native soil deposits. The native soils consisted of interbedded, unconsolidated, flood-plain deposits consisting of variations of clay, silt,.;sand and peat. The fine-grained silts and clays ranged from very soft to medium stiff while the granular silty sands and sands ranged from loose to medium dense. At the time of completing the cone probes, groundwater was encountered at a depth of about 11 feet below existing grades. We anticipate that groundwater levels will fluctuate throughout the year due to seasonal variations in rainfall. Preliminarily, it is our opinion that the addition could be supported on shallow, spread and continuous footings provided the site is preloaded and all foundation elements are supported on minimum 2 foot thick prisms of structural or controlled-density fill. In order to preconsolidate the native soils, a preload surcharge on the order of 6 to 8 feet high would be necessary for a duration of 60 to 90 days. The prisms of structural or controlled-density fill would need to be completed prior to construction of the preload. During the preload period, we estimate that settlement on the order of 2 to 4 inches could be realized. Net additional static settlement after construction could be on the order of 1 to 2 inches. We estimate that seismically induced, total and differential settlements from a design earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 6.5, could be as much as 6 inches. (Once laboratory testing is completed on the samples collected in our boring, we can provides a design document with specific recommendations regarding shallow foundations, preloading, and associated settlements. 19231 36th Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 • (425)771-3304 SEAPACK Warehouse Addition, J-388-02 Renton, Washington October 22, 1999 Page 2 We hope this letter meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. v Q Thomas A. Jones, P.E. / R• Z was Associate � +Q. -. � � n• °�` • 13O ,� 11146 W Alvin R. Zeman, P.E. � irs vv tip: Principal ,SstoNAL v.-AG EXPIRES , //}/oo Distribution: Mr. Jay Pickering— 1 copy Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 19231 36th Avenue W.,Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 I • :r Zeman Associates, Ins Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting • • 1 J-3R8 • • 9'June 1999 • Seattle Packaging • C/o Edifice'Construction Company, Inc. • 1417—31`!Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98144-3909 Attention: .Mr. Ed Fisher • • Subject• JeGt: Foundation Preloading/Supplemental Findings ts;-1°t i.; ;:._;;,; ,, Seattle Packaging 3+3 Printer • 1000 SW 43° Street E°`'° G ;': '� Renton,Washington m . r • Dear Mr. Fisher: ;J� . --- • This, letter is issued as a supplement to our original report On the 3+3 color printer • foundation which Seattle Packaging will install at their facility on 43`1 Street in Renton, • Washington. In addition,we performed a visual reconnaissance of the structure at your request • to ascertain lif the Condition of the building was consistent with the settlements estimated in the original site geotechnical study performed in 1978. . • . 3+3 PRINTER FOUNDATION . As discussed in our report of 20 May 1999, a variety of foundation options were considered for the settlement sensitive 3+3 color printer foundation. Based*on information that • the printer tracks could actually be relevelled in the event of differential settlement, it was concluded that a thinner mat on a preloaded foundation would be the most cost effective design approach. j . • • • . • • • •• Utilizing this approach, the floor slab was saw cut around the foundation so as to not • transfer load to surrounding areas of the:slab. The saw cut foundation area was then loaded with 85 "Eco Blocks"weighing 4320 pounds for a total loading of 367,200 pounds. Loading of the area was completed on/or about May 17, *1999.. The floor area immediately north of the . • foundation site is Currently loaded,with double drums of paper which impart a floor load on the • • order of 3S0-400 psf. On site personnel indicated that the foundation area had not been used previously for paper storage but the history of fluOr loading since 1978 could not be documented. • • • . Initial settlement.readings by Edifice indicated that some. portions of the preloaded slab • • . initially settled by approximately '/. of an inch. As oflune T (approximately 14 days) there was • no indication that additional settlement was taking place and the preload was scheduled for removal. 0 • . • . • 19231 • 36 Avenue W,Suitt D201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 . • j . • • • 1 Seattle Packaging -Go Edifice Consuuctioa Compan; 1-388 3+3 Printer Foundation 9 luncf e 2 - Renton,Washington Pag• e 2 . Based on this.data, it would be our professional opinion that the slab in the printer area more probably than not was loaded at some point in the past to a unit loading at least approaching the surcharge load. This previous loading and the surcharging load will at the least. tend to dampen out future differential settlements and reduce the need to relevel the tracks. Deeper seated settlements.from long-term loading of the machine will occur over a broader area with reduced differential settlements, BUILD1NG PERFORMANCE • As part of our study we were asked to perform a visual reconnaissance of the structure to see if there were any indications that the building had•indeed realized the settlements estimated in the Dames Si. Moore report of March 1979. Dames. & Maore had estimated that post- construction settlement of the dock height fill and structure would be on the order of 2 inches • with the possibility of an.additional S to 8 inches of total settlement if the slab were uniformly loaded to 500.psf. . . Although the exact magnitude of settlement cannot be ascertained on the basis of a visual examination,it definitely appears that the structure has been subjected to settlement on the order of magnitude that was predicted. Around the structure, the pavement slopes toward the building by what appears to be several inches even though the drain locations indicate the pavement was designed to drain away from the building. Additionally, there is obvious spelling around a great number of the"smooth bar"panel clips which tie the panels to the pilasters. This is typical of tilt • up structures)on soft alluvial deposits in the Renton/Kent area and is a clear indication that the • building has II been subjected to some long-term differential settlement, The dock height fill appears to have settled in a comparatively uniform manner since the floor slab, while gently undulating,is not severely cracked or distressed. We b Ielieve it would be prudent to have the building checked bystructural a engineer to ascertain if any of the spelled panel clips need repair or strengthening: Although most show only modest spalling typical of this type of site, severe spelling was noted at one location along the east building line,in the vicinity of the exit door. At this location,the wall panel appears to have . moved out by about one inch. Near the southwest terminus of the railroad spur; there is another panel where it appears that the panel clips were installed on the wrong side of the panel and thus never connected. ' • In summary, it appears that the building has performed in a manner consistent with the . original settlement predictions. Based on•the machine pad preload, it is apparent that at least portions of•the floor have previously received substantial floor loads and additional settlements should be norriirial under similar,loads. A case in point is the current paper storage area north of - the machine foundation which shows no.signs load. At the same dine there may be areas of obvious distress under comparatively heavy ' of the warehouse which have not been heavily loaded and it would he prudent to spread loads out as much as possible when utilizing new areas so as to minimize differential settlements. • ' - • j . Zgiwer Zeman Associates.Inc. 19231—36'"Avenue W..Suite H201 • Lynnwood,Washingtu 98036 (425)771-3304 • • • . „ Seattle Packaging • , "C/o Edifice Construction Compact: =, J-388 3+3 Printer Foundation • 9 June1999 3 Renton,Washington Pa• • ge 3 We appreciate. this opportunity to be of service. Should you have further questions. please do not hesitate to call. • Respectfully submitted, • . Zipper Zeman Associates,3nc. • • 16T Alvin R.Zeman,P.E. . Principal • • • • • . • • • i • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • Zipper ZenIsirAssociates.Inc. 19231-361 Avenue W.,Suite B2O1 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 • • . ZiUper Zeman-Associates, Inc. Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting• • �� ;. ... J-388 • �p iv.k .. : 0 May 1999 Seattle Packaging • c% Company,Inc.Edifice Construction Inc A. •q you x �. 7�I�S 1417—31st..Avenue South .. Pre--t_c'45 • Seattle,Waslungton 98144-3909 - .. • j /0-.,3 k.s (S—o oc- - ) rcv - ( fS. • Attention: 1 Mr.Ed Fisher Subject:. Results of Geotechnical Studies _ I5 b 'Q . Seattle Packa ing-6 Color Printer Foundation ors!-f - • • 1000 SW 43 m Street 601.ice- Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Fisher: . . . • Submitted herewith at your request are the results of our geotechnical studies related to foundation. design and construction for relocation of the 6=color printer and associated equipment.: Authorization•to proceed with this study, was provided by Edifice Construction Company,Inc. The purpose of this study was to establish general subsurface conditions within the existing warehouse building so that conclusions and recommendations regarding foundation design and construction could be formulated.. The scope of our services consisted of subsurface explorations;) geotechnical studies and preparation of this report. •Our scope of services did not include sampling or testing of soil or water for regulated environmental contaminants. . . • SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is a large existing warehouse structure located at 1000 SW 43rd Street in Renton, Washington. Reportedly; the structure was constructed in about'1978. A recently •received geotechnical report for the .building. (Dames & Moore 3/15/78) indicates that • insufficient time was available for surcharging prior to original construction. Dames & Moore estimated that settlements due to placement of the dock height fill would range between 8 and 11 • inches, although only about 2 inches'was anticipated at the completion of construction. An . additional 5 to 8 inches of settlement was predicted under an assumed floor.loading of 500 pounds per square'foot. Depending on the actual pattern of floor loading, post construction differential settlements of 1 to 3 inches were estimated due to the maximum assumed,loading. Based on visual examination, it appears that the structure has settled several inches since construction as evidenced by the sloping pavement in the truck dock areas. 19231—36t'Avenue W,Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 1 Seattle Packaging - ) • - J-388 6-Color Printer Foundation 20 May 1999 Renton,Washington Page 2 . . Although the building has been in place for more than 20 years, the history of floor • • loading is unknown at this time. The concrete floor slab is in good condition and there are no obvious signs l of excessive differential-settlement. At the same tine; there is no practical-way of • determining whether floor loads ever approached 500 psf in the proposed machine. location. Currently; double rolls of paper with an estimated floor loading.of 350 psf are stacked north of the,proposed machine area, but we understand they have never been stacked at'the area under consideration. ' ' - Current.plans call for the relocation of a 6-color printing machine which we understand • weighs approximately 155,000 pounds. The machine apparently travels back and•forth on rails over a distance of approximately 40 feet. Initially, the manufacturer and installer indicated that the machine'could only tolerate 0.040 inches of differential'settlement. Subsequent information indicates'that Ialthough not simple or convenient, the rails can be shimmed or otherwise adjusted . in the event of differential settlement. • ' • . . • In addition to the rail-mounted'printer, an overhead:structure referred to as a "festoon" will be located near the printer. Although this structure is.apparently settlenient sensitive, we . • understand that shimming or settlement adjustment of the base is possible. The dead load on the foundations for this project are estimated at 600 psf on-footings which are approximately 51/2'feet by 51/2 feet. i. . Subsurface Exploration • . .' • • • 1 . • . .: The subsurface .exploration consisted of advancing .one boring at the approximate location shown on Figure' 1. The exploration was located where the.6-color printer is to be. • : placed. The soil descriptions provided in this report are based upon the subsurface. conditions • • ' encountered at the boring completed at the project site, and review of the Dames & Moore report. ':- The Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity, Washington, by Waldron, Howard . - H., et al, describes .the site as being underlain by alluvium. The alluvium is described as . "chiefly sand and silt but includes clay and peat." South of Renton and Tukwila these fine . .alluvium'sediments are 15 to 25 feet thick and overlie alluvial sand and gravel. Alluvium may •contain interbeddedpeat and muck and has a high groundwater table. The soil unit "may settle excessively and irregularly because of layers of compressible organic material," according to the published data.- Based on. the borings performed prior to construction, the alluvium at this location is in excess of 100 feet thick. ' • The explorations disclosed both the fine grained fractions of the alluvium as well as fill 'material-, Fill material was encountered in boring B-1•to a depth of approximately 6:5 feet below ' the slab bottom. The fill consisted of medium dense to dense, gray sand with gravel. Drilling action suggested the potential presence-of cobble-size material, such as quarry spans, at the base of the fill. Th�The fill material was underlain by soft.to medium stiff,moist to wet, gray with fine • sand to the termination depth.of the boring at 16.5 feet below the slab bottom. Thus;•even after ' 20 years of use,the•underlying alluvium remains in a soft.state below the dock height fill. 1 • ; • Zipper Zeman Associate,Inc. ' . 19231—36'h Avenue W.,Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 I: is • Seattle Packaging J-388 • 6-Color Printer Foundation - • 20 May 1999 ` Renton,Washington • • Page 3 • Design Considerations . Based on the results of our subsurface boring.at the proposed machine location,together • with subsurface data contained in the original geotechnical report for the structure, the following conclusions and recommendations are presented with regard to the required foundation: . 1. The building was apparently constructed in.1978, reportedly without surcharging • because of schedule constraints. Based on our boring in the machine area, the dense sand and gravel fill beneath the floor slab extends to a depth..of . approximately'61/2 feet below the slab. Some drilling difficulty below the base of the fill leads us to believe that a layer of quarry.spans may have been placed on • the original ground surface to facilitate filling. Beneath the fill, extending to • . , approximately 16 feet below the slab, our test boring encountered soft to medium . 1 gray silt with fine sand. . . . .. . . . . 2. The test borings completed in 1978 for the three building complex of which this building is apart encountered highly variable soil conditions on the parcel ranging from soft organic clayey silts to soft sandy silts and loose to medium dense sand and silty sand horizons. These soft and loose to medium dense zones generally extended to great depths. Dames & Moore boring B-2; located in the southwest corner of the subject building, encountered soft silts. from•56 to 77 feet and . medium dense sands and silts to. 100 feet. Groundwater was encountered at • approximately. 13.5 feet in our boring, although the groundwater level may • fluctuate seasonally. 3. . Considering the site is underlain by soft or loose to medium dense soils to depths • of 100 feet or.more, it is 'not possible to design a settlement-free machine foundation without resorting to heroic measures such as end bearing pipe piles • • extending to depths in excess of 100 feet. Barring such an approach, our . recommendations'have been'formulated to reduce the potential for differential foundation settlement as much as feasible, assuming that some releveling,may be needed in the future. . 4. . . Several alternative foundation approaches were . considered to niinimi7e. . differential settlement of the foundation. Initially, the structural engineers considered a 2-foot wide by 2-foot deep reinforced•concrete foundation beneath - each rail. However, this:resulted in relatively high soil bearing pressures and the ' - potential for sizeable total and differential settlements. In order to reduce bearing pressures, we recommended that a mat foundation be considered using a modulus . . ':iof subgrade reaction of 7 pci:to account for the soft soils beneath the structural fill - underlying the .floor. Assuming surcharging of the soils underlying the foundation, we estimate that total settlement of the foundation could approach % • Z inch. ' Zipper Zeman Associates.Inc. 1923.1-36th Avenue W.,Suite 13201 . Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 Seattle Packaging J 388 6-Color Printer Foundation • 20 May 1999 Renton,Washington Page 4 ; Ultimately, Swenson Say Faget prepared two alternate designs based on the above • • criteria. One consisted'of a mat approximately 14 inches thick and the other.a mat 5 feet thick, 70 feet long and 16 feet wide. Based on the original information that • • ' differential settlements had to be•negligible, we recommend that the thicker mat be selected with the possibility of adding piles• to further reduce potential settlements. Based on the recent••information:that• releveling'of.the foundation racks is indeed possible,we have modified our original recommendation and now • recommend that consideration be given to the far less costly shallow mat 'foundation. Although .'subject to more deflection, the shallower mat . is substantially lighter and will be higher up in dense•granular fill material beneath the floor. • 5. If the floor in the proposed machine location was actually loaded to the originally . assumed 500.•psf;the proposed machine foundation would experience relatively minor settlements when completed. However,, since there is'no way to verify previous loading conditions, we recommend surcharging the floor slab prior to construction. Successful surcharging is a function of soil types,load, and time. Since we understand that time'is critical and the length of time available for surcharging is 30 days or less,.we recommend the surcharge load be -equal to 150% of the final machine loading. The most critical area will be the location 'where the machine normally sits, since .we understand the remainder of the mat ' ! will be subject to transient loading. Settlement markers should be placed at • • .• - several locations on the floor so that the actual'rate and magnitude.of settlement can be ascertained. • 6. Surcharging can be provided by either placing temporary surcharge weight on the • slab prior to foundation excavation,' or by placing 'temporary weight on the completed foundations prior to grouting the rails. We recommend that • surcharging prior to foundation excavation be considered; settlement monitoring during the surcharge period would allow refinement of the settlement estimates presented in this report. The slab should be sawcut prior to surcharging. If at all possible, we also recommend that the are adjacent to and immediately .. south of the foundation line be used for double roll paper storage..Although we. understand that the•paper is rapidly rotated, this would aid in the surcharging program by helping to accelerate deep-seated soil settlement. • 7. Tentatively, the surcharging would:be preformed using concrete ecology blocks: By analyzing the time rate *of settlement of the various settlement monitoring points,the length of time required and the anticipated post-construction settlement potential can be refined. • Zioner Zeman Associates,Inc. 1923 1-361h Avenue W.,Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036. (425)77.1-3304 Seattle Packaging . - . 3-388 6-Color Printer Foundation . . • - 20 May 1999 • Renton,Washington' • .• Page 5 • 8. The soft soils beneath the machine foundation are susceptible.to strain or loss of strength during seismic events. The effects of ground shaking during a.seismic event would cause several..inches of*settlement but the only feasible way to 1 eliminate.this possibility would be to found the Machine on extremely long end . . bearing piles. However,,even this option would create additional.problems as the • ;surrounding floor slab-would likely continue to settle with time(without a seismic event), creating a difference in elevation. • -• 9. !Since we understand that the "festoon" is also settlement-sensitive, we also • ,recommend surcharging these foundations.- .As currently envisioned, the dead - [load will be approximately 700 psf and we'again recommend a surcharge load equal'to 150%of'the design load. If possible, we would also recommend that the ;foundations be constructed so that some adjustment can be made in the event of long-term settlement. • -. • - • • 10. We understand that time is critical with regard to foundation construction and • machine.installation. Our best estimate is that a 30.day surcharging period would • be prudent for this settlement-sensitive•unit. In the event that 30 days is not .;available, it may'be possible to achieve the desired end'.result by increasing the load and thus decreasing the time. We are available to' work with your• • consultants should additional engineering be required. • ':We appreciate this opportunity to be of service•and look forward to working with you on _ '-_ _this project. Should you.have:further questions,_please do not hesitate to call. - - 1 Respectfully submitted, Zipper• 'Zeman Associates,In R. 2 • . �� F was. + 7 V6. . x• Alvin R.Zeman,P. E. ••re �, • µ' co I ' . .Principal . '�c% .pi, 11148 ,� 4jW GISTE4 ti' • 1r� � �ssIONAL S , • • __/rrrildill • John E. Zipper, P. E. • President 4 VA•2I .04 • 4O 1+ 4> Attachments: Figure 1 Site and Exploration Plan r , •.,�r�' z Log of Boring B-1 4 lib 1tit • F 'CI S`3'F,RI4'S. II .96, :!!ITT J-3.88:ARZ/das, . . • . - :; g. , ei,..„fi4 EXPIRES 1 /e:i/V1 I Zipper Zeman Associates.Inc. • 19231-36ih Avenue W.,Suite B201 Lynnwood,Washington 98036 (425)771-3304 • • • • • • • SW41� • • • • • • • • W W .z Z• :B-1 A • ® • W N •• . I • • • --- • ---- • SW43� • • . EXPLANATION • • B-i • - -.:'S •BORING'NUMBER•AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION i NOT TO SCALE • - • ZIPPER ZEMAN ASSOCIATES,INC. :PROJECT No.J-388 PROJECT NAME: -- • • • - DATE:May 1999 SEATTLE PACKAGING . • .GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DRAWN BY:'JLW ••RENTON,WASHINGTON . • • CONSULTING . FIGURE 1 -SITE AND EXPLORATION • - _ PLAN PROJECT:Seattle Packaging OB NO. J-388 • • BORING B.. • PAGE 1.OF 1 _ Location: Renton,Washington Approximate Elevation:Bottom of floor slab .• • Soil Description ,� en "et 8 aE. a �, Penetration.Resistance fl • A F . Standard Blows per foot . Other 10• 20• 30 . .40 • S-1 • Dense grading to medium dense,damp,gray to brown, •' . i i. i i i 4- ••1 i { SAND with some gravel and silt(Fill) ' ?.•. 4 {.......{ {.......{ �..«...{ i 1 i •i •i i {• 1 i • S-2 i "- 4 4 i i i i i 4 . i 5 -Very hard,choppy drilling 5 to 6.5 feet,possible cobbles 1 •• i i { i i ill Soft to sti$moist to wit,gray SILT with some black fine .... S-4 i i i { i»""'i { i sand • i 1 •./..i i i { i i ••.• .. .• ».{.. 4 i i i i i i 10 i i i• i i i i i i • T ., i 4�•.•.i i i i { i i • I ...,.... s-6 Z i . i 4, 4 4 i { 1 { 4 7 . A TD •••• i /4 i 4 4 4--— 4 4 • . • 4 i i i 4 i•»••••i i .4.••••--- i 4 4 4 4 i•»«»{...»•.{ { • Total•depth 16.5 feet i•••-•••i i i i i••»-.•i i : .. i i i 1 i {•••.• i i •.. • .. • 4 i..»...i 4 i i.......{ 4 4 -«•-••i =i 4 i. 4 i 4 i i • • • i 4.--...1 i i {...«..{ 4 f •. . { ... i i - { 4 { ....... .. - 'i •EXPLANATION •• 0 20 ' . 40 60 80 100 I.• 2-inch O.D.split spoon sample • Moisture Content • •II 3-inch I.D.Shelby tube sample' Plastic Limit Natural . Liquid Limit '* Groundwater level at time of drilling ' . ATD . or date of measurement • • Zipper Zeman Associates,Inc. '. • . Geotechnical&Environmental Consultants . • . ,e100111• .k.....stes .,,......„_,....., . . .. . , • ,.. -4-ik . . - . . . .......„.......„....„. . .Soi,. .s P r- . . . ?78. • • • REPORT .OF SOILS INVESTIGATION • PROPOSED WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS RENTON, WASHINGTON • for the 1 JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • DAMES & MOORE March 15, 1978 • • . 04368-031-05 • F : ter• • 10"DA1S a i ®OSCE' OCN VCR SANTA BAMBARA RBANKS SEATTLE MELBOURNE TORONTO NOLULIL CONSULTANTS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES ,STRACUSE • HOUSTON VANCOUVER,B.C. WASHINGTON, C. LEXINGTON,KY WHITE PLAINS • SUITE SO NORTH 0, GATE EXECUTIVE CENTER • ISS N.E.IOOLH STREET • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98125 • (206) 52 =Os60 CABLE: DAMEMORE E TWX: 910-444-2021 • • • March 15, 1978 • • Jack A. BenaroyaCompany 5950 Sixth Avenue South Seattle, ;Washington 98108 • • Attention: Mr.. .Robert Fennel • Gentlemen: • We submit herewith six copies of our "Report of Soils Investigation,Proposed ,Warehouse Buildings, Renton, Washington." • ` The purpose 'and scope of our investigation was outlined in our confirming proposal ,dated.February 22, 1978. Our findings and preliminary have been discussed with Mr. Fehnel and Mr. Richard Janke of Engineers 'Northwest during the progress of the' investigation. We have recommended that the buildings be supported on spread footings.. Significant settlements can be expected due to fill and building loads because of the compressible nature of some of the underlying soils. • Since'it is desired to proceed with, construction without surcharging the building areas, postconstruction'settlements of several inches, both. ' total and differential, are. anticipated. Thus, the potential for some structural distress will' exist. This can be minimized by design panel connections to accommodate larger differential movements butflittle. can be done to• reduce possible differential movements across floor areas. • . We appreciate the opportunity to serve you on this project. Should ' • any questions arise concerning our findings or evaluations, we will be pleased to confer with you at any time. • •i •. Yours very truly, DAME MOORE in • 1 By I:agr • • ' ck K. Tuttle • Partner • • JKT:JRF:mb • • REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION • PROPOSED WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS RENTON, WASHINGTON • • FOR THE JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY INTRODUCTION We present in this report the results of our soils investigation at I • the site of three proposed • ' warehouse buildings to be built in Renton,• • ' Washington. The building site is located in an undeveloped area to the north of'Southwest 43rd Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue. The proposed building locations are shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan. The proposed buildings will be approximately 690 by 544 feet in plan dimensions 'and will be of concrete, tilt-up construction. It is our II ' . understanding that the buildings will have dock-high floor slabs, with a 11 rail slot into the interior of the buildings. Design floor loads of about II 500 pounds er square ,p •foot are anticipated: • i i. il We also understand that the building schedule does not allow for' preloading the site and that the subfloor fill will be placed and allowed to set 2 to 3 weeks before footing construction is started. IlI Also, due to the size of the buildings and floor loads,ds, it has been i determined by the owner that it is not economical to support the building frame. and floor slab on pile or pier foundations. PURPOSE AND SCOPE . • The purpose of this investigation is to explore the subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site and provide design criteria • for foundation support for the proposed structure. More specifically, • the scope of our work includes: DAMES a MOORE • • • I. . Recommendations for allowable soil bearing pressures .to be used in the• design of spread or continuous footings. . • • 2. Estimates of the magnitude and-rateof settlement which will . occur under the imposed fill and building loads. • 3. Recommendations for floor slab support. • 4. Comments regarding site preparation as may be appropriate. Particular consideration was to be given to the. evaluation of. whether or not it will be practical to construct the warehouses without • ' completing a surcharging program 'to reduce postconstruction settlements. • To accomplish the purposes of the. investigation, we have completed . a program of field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering . analyses. The field investigation included drilling eight borings. Various laboratory tests were performed on representative samples to • provide the basis for engineering analysis. ' J The details and results of our field exploration and laboratory testing programs are presented in the appendix to this report. Our recommendations, based on site observations and engineering analysis, are presented in the following sections of this report. • • SITE CONDITIONS • 'SURFACE CONDITIONS ' • • The site is relatively flat with sparse grass on the fill surface. Drainage is not•well developed as some surface water was present during • our field investigation. Southwest 43rd Street is in existence; however, . 'the other streets' and.railroad spurs are not yet constructed. ' The 111 surface of the compacted fill which covers the property was soft but i; could support light vehicles. • �2� saAMES 8 MOORE • • • SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS • . • • The subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by- drilling . eight test borings to depths ranging from 50 to 110 feet at the locations shown on Plate 1. The logs of the borings along with the results of our • • laboratory tests are presented in the appendix to this report--Field . Exploration and Laboratory Tests. • Five soil units were encountered by our test borings. A description' i� of these units •in order of increasing depth is as follows. • Unit 1. Unit 1 is fill consisting of brown silty sand.with gravel . I! and some organics, especially near the surface. The fill is 3 to 4 feet ; thick. . . Unit 2'. Unit 2 is the original surface soil which consists of interlayered brown and gray silts with sand layers and compressible • 1I organics. The thickness of this unit is from 5 to 15 feet with the thinnest section in the middle of the site. Unit 3. Beneath Unit 2 is a zone of interlayered medium dense gray fine 'sand, silty sand, and sandy silt. . This unit varies from approximately 20 keet thick on the eastern part of the site to 40 feet on the western part .of the site. _ • • Unit 4. Unit 4 is a soft clayey silt. This silt is also highly • compressible and does not appear to have significant PP continuous sand layering. Some organic material and sea shells were observed in this • soil.. This unit was only penetrated by the two deep borings, but it ;; :appears the layer is thicker on the eastern part of the site as Boring 1 encountered approximately 50 feet of the material. Boring 2, on the western part of the site, encountered only 20 feet. • Unit 5. Unit 5 consists of medium dense to dense sand. The thickness of this. layer was not measured. • . • j • DAMES 8 MOORE -3- . .• • • • • • . . ' -• • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS .: - • • .It was difficult to measure the ground water conditions during our • . field activities because•the- test holes caved when the hollow-stem, auger , . was removed; However, in several borings water was measured at a depth . . . • of about 5 feet while, or immPdiately after drilling. .This depth seems reasonable based on our past experience in.the area. Some fluctuation in • , the ground water can be expected with the highest levels during and after periods of heavy precipitation. . . • • .. • ll . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . • GENERAL ' • • II . • . ' . • ' . . • 11 .. The fill, which has been placed to grade the site will provide• support for shallow spread footings designed using a low bearing pressure. ' . , Considerable settlement is anticipated, primarily from the loads to be imposed by fill to establish floor grades and from storage loads on the . floor. It would be desirable to reduce postconstruction settlements by .... surcharging the building areas with excess 'fill in advance of construction. , .We understand that your time sohedule as well as the costs involved have been, the reasons for deciding to proceed without a surcharging progral. We have evaluated the probable consequences of this procedure and believe . . it is generally practical. However, the potential for differential settlements which would cause some ttructural stress cannot be discounted. . This can occur as the result of irregular loading patterns within the :building, a situation which is difficult to control or predict. • . . . , ., . Our detailed conclusions and .recommendations are presented below. . . ..:. . . . •I . I SITE GRADING AND FILL PLACEMENT . . • • . • All fill placed on the site which is tO establish floor or yard area grades should be compacted to '95 percent of the maximum dry density as • determined by AASHTO Compaction Test Procedure T-180. Fill in any other , areas may be compacted to. 90 percent of maximum density. We recommend - -4- ' • DAMES Et•10110011tE • that all fill placed at the site consist. of clean, granular soil. If the fill is to be placed in wet weather, the percentage of fines (particles passing the No. 200 sieve) should not exceed:5• P In dry weather,' • percent.- fill with less than 10 percent fines could be used. We recommend that if • a soil with more than 5 percent fines is used. as fill, a 4- to 6-inch . • • .crushed rock base be placed• beneath 'the floor slabs and footings. All _ fill should be placed in layers of approximately 8' •to 10 inches in .loose, i thickness and rolled with appropriate compaction equipment'. Soil containin roots or other organic material should be excluded from the fill. g • . . Prior to placing any new fill, •the•existing fill surface should . be •thoroughly proof rolled with -a heavilyloaded'truck or a large 9 pneumatic- . . tired roller.'� Any soft or loose spots which cannot be compacted should 'be excavated. . • • The fill areas should be, graded to prevent ponding of water. Since substantial settlement is anticipated, it'may be desirable to adjust I.- . . I _ grading.plans to allow for this movement. The gradients of any gravity 4 flow utility lines should••also be established taking into consideration 1 settlements in and •around building areas. • • FOUNDATION SUPPORT- We conclude that the ro p posed•structures can be supported on ' shallow footings founded within the till 'that exists on the site. A • • �' design bearing pressure of. 1 500 ounds square per foot may be used to • .proportion footings for dead plus long-term. live load conditions. This value may be increased by one-third. when considering short-term live . • loading •due to •wind,. seismic;:•snow, or other transient loadings. Grades : for exterior footings. should•be held•as• high. as possible in. the existing A • . 0 fill, preferably. with a confinement of no more than 18 inches and no less . . i than 12 inches. A minimum footing width of .18 inches should be used. • . ' I; • Interior column .footings should be established as high in the' dock-height fill as practical.. 'We recommend that the exposed-bearing surface•for all A . exterior footings be thoroughly compacted.' This activity should be •.. I. . observed by a soils engineer who would advise .on whether or not any zones :I require excavation •and replacement. ' -5- DAMES B.MOORE •. . . . . . . , • . • • . • . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . ' • • . . . . . . . . ' - • . . . . . . . . Settlements of footings so designed are expected to be on the order • . of 1 to 1-1/2 inches. These settlements relate only to the applied. structural loads; the structural frame of the building will also be . • • • • subjected to settlements due to the influence' of fill placed to establish • . . . the dock-high floor grade and subsequently imposed floor loads. Footing I- settlements are expected to occur rapidly after load application with . . approximately 50 .percent occurring in ], to 2 weeks and 90 percent within . 1 month. . ' - . . . . .• • • • . . . • FILL SETTLEMENTS . . . ii • . . • . • . , . . . . We estimate that ultimate settlements which will be experienced . • 1 under fill placed to establish the dock-high floor grade will. be in the • 1 11 range of 8 to 11 inches. The greater amount of settlement is expected 11 . toward the easterly end of the site where. a thicker stratum of compressible soil exists at depth. . . . . . • ' . . -- We understand that your plans for placement of fill for the first building pad will permit a period of delay.of some 2 to 3 weeks between the time the filling is completed and work begins for building construction. - We estimate that on the order of 50 to 60 percent of the ultimate settle- . ment6 will occur during this period leaving' a residual settlement on the • . order of 3 "to 4 inches resulting from 'the continuing consolidation of the . compressible strata under the influence of these fill loads. The rate at . which these settlements will occur depends largely upon the extent and frequency of sand lenses within the compressible strata; thus, our time estimates must be considered approximate. We anticipate that settlements remaining due to the influence .of fill loads only at the time the building . . . . is completed will be on the order of 2 inches. ' • •. . . . , FLOOR SETTLEMENT . . . . • . . . . ..Additional settlement will be. experienced as floor loads are,imposed during building mperation. The extent of these settlements is dependent • upon the actual loading realized and the length of time these loads -.--- remain in place. Because of frequently changing floor-loading patterns, • . • -6- 1318411011ES 83 MOORE . •. . . . • the realization of ultimate settlements may not be experienced for a long period of time; if ever. Assuming an average floor loading over the entire buildingarea of 500poundsper square foot, we estimate that ultimate settlements due to the effects of these loads could be in the range of 5 to 8 inches. Thus, ultimate settlement of the buildings. after completion of construction due to the combined influence of fill and floor loads could be in the range of 7 to 10 inches. The pattern of loading within the building will be a major controllin factor with respect to differential settlement behavior. If localized g I areas of the floor are loaded to high intensity and large areas are loaded to much lower intensity, differential settlements of 1 to 3 inches could be experienced over fairly short distances. If the loading pattern is fairly uniform throughout the building area, particularly along the perimeter walls, maximum differential settlements which could potentially be realized along the length of a precast wall panel, assuming 25-foot long panels, should not exceed 1 inch over the long term. This is • greater than is normally anticipated in design of a tilt-up structure; therefore,• consideration should be given to these movements in designing the connections between panels. 0 INSPECTION AND MONITORING We recommend that all earthwork and foundation construction be observed by a member of our staff. Care in the placement and compaction. . of fill is necessary to develop the required bearing capacity for support of the. footings and floor. slab. • We also recommend that settlement markers be placed on the present -ground surface prior to placement of fill. Data from these markers will �I provide the basis for evaluating whether or not actual time rate and magnitudes of settlement are within the predicted ranges. The markers ii must be read before any fill is placed. The average ground surface p elevation around each marker should be recorded with each marker reading. Readings should be taken twice weekly duringthe • • - filling period and through the delay period to start of construction. Readings should be • DAMES 8 MOORE • - continued on a once-a-week basis thereafter for as long as markers can be maintained. Observation points should be established at locations • on the perimeter wall and interior column points to provide continuity of • elevation readings after the building is completed and in operation. . . The following plate and appendix complete this report:.. Plate : Plot Plan . Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Tests • Respectfully submitted, DAMES MOORE J k K. Tuttle • • Partner ; J froceirirr„y " • JRT:mb. fillM43arch 15, 197868-031-05 el f • ��WAS�y���jX �4 1 4% 411 % \ ...es . • Z*PD,�F,RFcrsrEa�c ��W11! ois t2Pl.s1:;1111 • • • -8- CIPAMES 8 MOORE 4..nc‘..ncu CT• FILE 73615 -O" BE,y4zoy4 BY _ DATE • .i )) PROPERTY LINE SW 41ST STREET • _:....... • j I. r 1 O D • • o r n Z ID D � 4 3 D • 1 m ## 1 1 21 PROPOSED 5 PROPOSED $ i�- BUILDING 0 3 BUILDING 2 PROPOSED BUILDING ® 1 SW 43RD STREET -- . • • • • • a • a . KEY: • • PLOT PLAN N •it,- BORING LOCATION A FEET • 6A. 11111.7 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 • NREFERENCE: UNDATED SKETCH, ENTITLED "SITE PLAN" BY JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY. • I • • • • • • • , • • . • • • • • APPENDIX • - • • FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS - • • • • • FIELD EXPLORATIONS • • The field'investigation consisted of drilling• eight test -borings at • the locations shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan. ' The borings were drilled with • truck-mounted, hollow-stem, auger equipment on Febrnary 15 through 17, 1978. The operation was directed by a geotechnical engineer from our staff who classified, the soils encountered in the borings, maintained a continuous ' log, of each boring, and obtained disturbed and undisturbed soil samples. . 11 for visual examination and laboratory testing. The logs of the borings are presented on Plates A-1 through A-5. The soils have been classified in accordance with. the Unified Soils Classification System, which is described on Plate A-,6. A description of the soil and ground water conditions is 4 1 • included in the report text. • • • In each boring, soil, samples were obtained at intervals of approximately 5 feet using a Dames & Moore Type U Sampler as illustrated on Plate. A-7. The sampler was driven with a weight of 300 pounds falling a distance.of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches into the soil is shown above the sample notations on the boring logs. • Observations of the ground water level were made while drilling. However,, these indicated water levels may or may not reflect the true . ground water- level. •Our experience indicates that during wetter periods of the year, the ground water level may rise to near the natural ground surface or within '4 feet of the existing ground surface. LABORATORY TESTING. .. • • Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of .soils 1 encountered in the borings to evaluate their pertinent physical character- ! 1 istics. The laboratory program included sample inspection and soil classification, strength tests, consolidation tests, and moisture-density • determinations. • A-1 DAMES as mecum The shear strengths of the soils were evaluated by means of triaxial compression tests and direct shear tests. The triaxial tests were performed under unconsolidated, undrained conditions at a relatively rapid rate of axial deflection. The tests were recycled to zero load after :; reaching the approximate yield point and then .carried to failure. The direct shear tests were performed under drained conditions at a rate of shear deflection of 0.05 inches per minute. The results .of the triaxial . compression tests are presented on Plate A-8, and the results of the direct shear tests on Plate A-10. The test procedures for these tests are described on Plates A-9 and A-11.• • • Consolidation tests were performed on three samples to provide data . . li for estimating settlements. :The consolidation• test results are presented in graphic form on Plates A-12 and A-13.. The test procedure is described on Plate A-14.. ..._.._ .__. _,._.. . • • Moisture and density test results are shown on the Log Of Borings; Plates A-1 through A-5. Vane shear strength tests were conducted on representative samples of the soft, •silty soils. . The results of these tests are presented on Plate A-15. • • • • • • . • • • • A-2 pAMES 8 MOOR6 • • • • • • • BORING • • • • • • • • J/ S M BROWN SILTY SAND WITH SOME ORGANICS • NEAR GROUND • SURFACE(FILL) • 5 I I OL BRoon(MEDIUM OFROWN ORGANIC nWITM OCCASIONAL • • ML GRAY BROWN FINE VERY SANDY`SILT • (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE) • 2 10 . • OCCASIONAL LAYERS OF FINE SAND • • 65• ■ • • —•.....- — GROUND WATER LEVEL WHILE DRILLING • 2-16-78 . • 2 33.196-79 5 IS ■ 53.9%-69 • • 7D • SP DARK GRAY FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT ' • • 10 1 . $k( (MEDIUM DENSE) 35.3% 3 • . 75 DARK GRAY FINE SAND(DENSE) • 39 o ':wi • • •j• t 25.7%-95 IIIry • 51.0%-72 • . '80 t ::: • - • • O =_ . ' • Z 4 k 85 ■ . p W • • • • 31.796-91• • Iw, OCCASIONAL LAYERS OF SILTY SAND 1 • 35 , _1..7.7j ■ • SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND INTERLAYERED �; ML WITIi'GRAY SANDY SILT(MEDIUM DENSE) I� SM GRAY FINE SILTY SAND(LOOSETERLAYERED 40 : 1 • 4 DENSE) ANDY SILT TO MEDIUM f 22.396-101 •• 7 • 99. • • • ML DARK GRAY SANDY SILT INTERLAYERED • 1 WITH DARK GRAY SILTY SAND(LOOSE) . ■ ' 13 . IS ® / . . 100 • ML' GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL ; �`.S P GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND(DENSE) 2 SILTY SAND LENSES(SOFT) . 10146. . 5047.3%-71 105 • • 26.396-98 ■ 110 BORING COMPLETED 2-17-78 •• • • • • KEY:. • • • MOISTURE r6LOWS REQUIRED 'TO DRIVE-SAMPLER ONE FOOT CONTENT/. • WEIGHT. 300 L8S., STROKE- 30 INCHES, DRY_ 1t ■INDI•CATES DEPTH AT WHICH UNDISTURBED. DENSITY SAMPLE WAS EXTRACTED. • • IN PCF • • INDICATES DEPTH AT WHICH DISTURBED • • . SAMPLE WAS EXTRACTED.• • • • • O INDICATES DEPTH OF SAMPLING ATTEMPT WITH ' • NO RECOVERY. . • • . • NOTE: • • THE DISCUSSION IN'THE TEXT OF THIS REPORT IS • NECESSARY FOR A PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF THE SUBSURFACE MATERIALS. • • • • • • • • • • • . LOG OF BORINGS • • • oAM■B 8 MAAss • • • • • • • • BORING 2 • • • 11 SM BROWN IO SILTY SANDBBLES WITH GRAVEL AND, OCCASNAL CO ( DENSE) ' • 1).Iilli . t1 (FILL) • 29.4%-96 10 11_ • • .,l 5 n I I OL GRAY SILT AND ORGANIC SILT WITH ROOTS ' • n (MEDIUM DENSE) PI 8 I IA. MOTTLED BROWN AND GRAY FINE SANDY ML GRAY FINEORGANICS(S SAOFT)NDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL • 7.896-121 7 SM SILT INTERLAYERED WITH FINE SILTY SAND (M • 10 EDIUM DENSE), . WATER LEVEL WHILE DRILLING 2-17-78 60 • • ,OH GRAY BROWN SILT WITH ORGANICS AND . LAYERS OF BROWN PEAT(SOFT) • 66.896-59 ■ • 15 \. 48.796-n. II 65 • SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LAYERS OF • 12 ti FINE SANDY SILT AND SILT(MEDIUM • • 33.996-112 DENSE TO LOOSE) 2 20\ Y, • ■ 70 v • . F. d S ?S Z ■ . OCCASIONAL THIN LENSES OF FINE -__sp GRAY FINE SAND.WITH TRACES OF SILT I • SAND j. R_- SM AND LAYERS OF FINE SANDY SILT 2 n I1• = (MEDIUM DENSE) c 32.696-89 • =_ • • ' 8 j+I I sm GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LAYERS 30 ):r ■ )! OF FINE SANDY SILT(MEDIUM DENSE) • e 80 iti SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND INTERLAYED WITH ��' FINE. I SAND AND SILTY FINE SAND !l , 9 • • ■ �� 1 (MEDIUM DENSE) 13 1�;II • ' i 85 III,IN • + GRAY FINE SAND WITH LAYERS OF SILTY ,033.996-86' �M FINE SAND(MEDIUM DENSE) _ _ 90 • i! t I 22 • ,o' _— 45 •■ �� • • 30.6%-89 ■ i . II 95 30.796-88 • • � i50 II y 100 ■ BORING COMPLETED 2=17--78 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • LOG OF BORINGS • • • • • • • • • • • • BORING 3 BORING' 4 • • • • u . � • It. SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL 0 5 /i A(F RGANIC MATERIAL(MEDIUM DENSE) ,.c SM B`FOW;SILTY FlNE SAND WITH GRAVEL c. • 43.696-77 ■. S IIII ML--BRAY CLAYEY ORGANIC SILT(SOFq • S�' '-106 f/1. OL GROUND WATER LEVEL WHILE'DRILLING MI_ 'BROWN SILT.WITH ORGANICS(SOFT) 2-20-78 OL 1 125.0%-38 ■ • 50.1%-70 • • 10 S P DARK GRAY FINE SAND WITH TRACES OF 10 • SILT(MEDIUM DENSE) • - . • 2B . • ■ III . SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SANDY 15 • • lig 15• �'I ML SILT LAVERS AND SOME ORGANIC I • MATERIAL(MEDIUM DENSE) I 3{ Bli[ 18.096-102 ■ ---- - •zs:3�-qz .. ...__. - -- I• zo � • 48 s I] • -; GRADING TO MEDIUM SAND . • • • uk V.096-90 ■ o MI_ .GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANIC 43.496-77 r SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH LAYERS OF SILTY. 30 MATERIAL(SOFT) 30 SM SAND (MEDIUM DENSE) • 16 • LAYERS OF FINE SAND • 32.596-94 II 4 t 35 35 4rn • • • • ...?.• .= 1 zb • nu ■ ` • • • • • 45 O. 45 • •• I • j . y` 3 7 _. • ' 46.696-71' ■ - so BORING COMPLETED 2-20-78 3 - GROUND WATER LEVEL NOT OBSERVED • SS - 2 • . • ■ . 60 •a •• • ■ . . • • 2 . 55.496-76 ,■ • 7D • 5 . ■• 75 ' BORING COMPLETED 2-20-78 ' • • • • • • . • • • • • LOG OF BORINGS •• • . • - Y>tAMP'g R amAAs� •• • • - . . .. . ' • • • • , . • • • • • • • . . ' . .. • . . . . BORING 5 • BORING.6 • . . • • • 0 . .sm BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL ii111111 BROWN SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL(FILL) • ,. (FILL) . 6 ). • 3 GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANIC • 41.7%-73 • ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANIC MATERIAL 51.1%-73: II MATERIAL(SOFT) . . 5 AND LAYERS OF SILTY FINE SAND (MEDIUM 5 SOFT) . ill 7 -GROUND WATER LEVEL WHILE DRILLING • 13 IIII GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH SILT LAYERS (MEDIUM DENSE) , . • 10 1t,..SM GRAY SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE). . . 10 1111 .• .S.-. . " .0 ,,,,,.) SP DARK GRAY FINE SANDWITHDLAENYSEERS OF GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH LAYERS OF 89.2%-45 • • GRAY SILTY SAND (MEDIUM ) BROWN ORGANICS AND SAND (SOFT) . • 15 16 t:I', • 15 1 ' 1 i SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH LAYERS OF • I . . . III ..-.. . . . .• . 11 III i SANDY SILT(LOOSE) • ' I I . 20 t• 20 ! 1 It ' • 2 lill• • . . ] •.' 3 . • 7 MI - 1 25 •"••, . z . 25 g :11/1 . . 1 • ...• fa 1 li!iii: 6 • ' 30.9%-92 • - 25.636-99 • --,-----en •••• - ir---- Qr DARK GRAY FINE SAND(MEDIUM'DENSE) 30 30 F--.-7-a:- - r . • . 32.9%-104 • . • • E.-:-- -.- SILTY SAND LAYER 1.....-.---. • 35 35 LF, • • C. -...1.-- • I ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH TRACES OF SHELLS 1 ----- - . • (SOFT) I: ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH TRACES OF . 40 40 • FINE SAND(SOFT) 23 • 1i 11 . • !,k, SM GRAY SILTY SAND WITH SILTIER LAYERS 38.0)6-82 45 •, • , .•. (MEDIUM DENSE) 45 . • e • 1 . • . r .• ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH LAYERS OF FINE . 18 ' 430%48 SAND (SOFT) GRAY SILTY FINE SAND LAYER 4 . M • . 50 • 50 BORING COMPLETED 2-21-78 ' BORING COMPLETED 2-21-78 . • GROUND WATER LEVEL NOT OBSERVED 1 . . • • . • .• . . . . . . i . • . . • . . . . . . . . • • • • . • ' .. . . . . . • • • • . . • . . . • . . • • LOG OF .BORINGS . . - .. . . CIALPIIIIES a avooraz . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • BORING 7 BORING:8 • • • • • Ilk SM BROWN AND GRAY SILTY SAND'WITH ; �7 • 1��11I GRAVEL(FILL) SM BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL 1 t. (FILL) •• �•1`X'-� • ' ML GRAY BROWN CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANIC • ' S MATERIAL(SOFT) S ■ (OL)BROWN ORGANIC SILT(MEDIUM SOFT) SM GRAY SILTY SAND WITH'LAYERS OF BROWN • OL ORGANIC SILT(LOOSE) • 10 • 11:89y-70 r • • 10 • • . i.;".. SP DARK GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND TRACES OF i ' ' • • a-''j SILT AND SILTY;SAND LAYERS.(MEDIUM • �_ DENSE) • � _ 16 1 SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH SOME SILTY SAND • 15 ■ LAYERS (MEDIUMDENSE) • 1S at • • 28 Fr--.-- • 13 I0— - . . - _ • II20 __ . . . .. : i j Z' • taa • • • __ c .25 I • =a 30 • 29.9%-125 II 30 • 32 • • • ; • • 35 • ■ • II { SILT LAYER •1 ML • GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH A TRACE OF =_ ■•• . SHELLS (VERY SOFT) • • • • • • •i ' • 1 17.1%-76 ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH SILTY SAND LAYERS45 1 (SOFT) 52.2%-70 ■ . • • • 2 • • BORING COMPLETEDATEREVEL 2-21-78 SO II • - GROUND W L NOT OBSERVED BORING COMPLETED 2-21-78 . GROUND WATER LEVEL NOT OBSERVED • • • • • • • • r • u . . .S . • •i. • • 67AMB1EB a MOORB! • • • • • Id Ad DIVISIONS A . GRAPH LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL 'OESCR/,PTIONS • • ��• • M' WELL-GRADED GRAVELS. - • GRAVEL CLEAN' GRAVELS' }I:�%: GW SAND MIXTURES.'LITTLE OR • ND FINES AND (LITTLE OR NO tM' ;•••II • GRAVELLY' . FINEST Bk_;+o9l:•••••• SOILS 4 q, °#*film POORLr-GRADED • COARSE . _:1 -:al-::: }# GP• SAND.MIXTURES. LITTLE OR GRAINED ":: 'a`°"I:°" • NO FINES SOILS. 1I • YORE TXAN SO$ ����1 ,•�'•C . •SILTY• GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND- •. • OF COARSE FNAe- GRAVELS WITH FINES s•Ill)•,II;ill GM' SILT MIXTURES • TION gIETAINF,Q (AF►RECIABLC AMOUNT . • • ON NO. N SIEVE • OF FINEST• , •• i / GRAVELS. GRAVEL.SAND. . .,� ,%� GC• CLAY 'MIXTURES • SAND ,�.• SW WELL-GRADED SANDS. ' AND • . CLEAN SAND. ,•. SANDS, LITTLE OR NO PINES (LITTLE ON NO .. .�• . SANDY FINES •A•""«•- ..'.}:T • MORE THAN y0•A ,•SOIL$ • i E ei. SP POORLY-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY • IIIIII1Plir °"''`°'�""'«'ii jfl5 SANDS, •LITTLE OR NO'FINES MATERIAL IS --.........::-:;::::..... .LARO[R'THAN..�• __.:..:,.. ._ ..... _. _ .�_:. ..-. .. ... .. 200 SIEVE SIZE _ .. .. ii ;1' 4I • • • ��. f ,• MOUE TXAN so•,� SANDS WITH FINES SM SILTY SANDS; SAND-SILT MIXTURES Or COARSE FRAC-(APPRECIABLE AMOUNT )) +( ITION PASSING OF flNEf) /i�'� "� • ' NO. 4 SIEVE /�/r" f • p/�. r JC CLAYEY SANDS, SAMD•CLAY MIXTURES • • •INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE" SANDS. ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR • ML CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY • FINE SILTS ' GRAINED AND LIQUID LIMIT;—• CLAYS, • INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM .cee THAN SO / CL ICITY, • SOILS . CLAYS eLANr°s eLArs, SILTY CLAYS.LEAN • • • ;i III 1 1 ( ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC • • 11 1j1 III of. ORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY III • III II II MI lii II I I INORGANIC SILTS, CACEOUS OR MH SIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR ililli II I I li II II SILTY SOILS MORE THAN 00•$ SILTSj� //. . OF IAl Is AND LIQUID LIMIT /�j// INORGANIC CLAYS OF NIGH . $L13L6L$. THAN MQ CLAYS .QR m5. THAN SO 4// CH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS . • • 200 SIEVE SQL • /�/�/�. • ii � • ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO NISH j �� OH .. /LASTICTT,.ORGANIC SILTS • HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH NIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS • NOTE DUAL STY00LS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS. • SOIL . •'CLASSIFICATION • • CHART• • • • • • • • • • UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM • OAM68 8 SWOONS! • • • 11 114i1 • • • is : _------ l:i'.;;. SOIL SAMPLER TYPE ' U • DRIVING OR PUSHING `,> FOR SOILS DIFFICULT TO RETAIN IN SAMPLER • aECHANISM • • • • • 1 COUPLING ' i . • • : WATER OUTLETS •: • ,• • t. .�j • • • • • • '4 • • . . . NOTCHES FOR u t • FISHIING TOOL /, ( G• N' CHECK VALVES • NEOPRENE GASKET I 1 & i • 4%� • HEAD • `:40 jL`i�j • ��iat � • VALVE CAGE • • • • NOTE' ' 'HEAD EXTENSION.CAN . %• I' BE INTRODUCED BETWEEN . '*HEAD.'AND•SPLIT BARREL• • j:i'llt, i • 11111t • ALTERNATE ATTACHMENTS • SPLIT BARREL, t. �OPCOFACIRETSAdPLERjOPAL' j \ , - - . ?: :.i CORETAINER E•R , \ is RIj•w. .2.0.1).NGS • I-,, titi: SPLIT BARR N 1 lif !° '�• ''' . • ) I • LOCKING %• �•ii ii� • • 1: RING I .� j�•COR DEVICE NING • ' � • ; , • ' - . • I y.,; /. SPLIT # ♦• •/ . ' ti� .CORE-RETAINING FERRULE ,F t • �� ,• k RET4. AIN R RING F+ k •• RETAINER PLATES • t•� (INTEBO(ANGEABLE WITH I ��it J OTHER TYPES) •. ; THIN.MALLED :1 0 r; �; ; SAaPLING TUBE j ,i .'.' (INTERCHANGEABLE ! i it ,( .fn, LENGTHS) IM - �+ • 14.' y„ • • • • V,A- • I • • 1 . OASIMEIS a 51111Oee= I .• ' CHECKED : BY - .FILE 36 S' . 31 ' -BY DATE • • , - -•• • :r • • • • • . TEST BORING • DEPTH -•SOIL TYPE • 5 • 1 .5 28 FINE SILTY SAND' •. ' • 2 1 . • 23.5 FINE SAND . • • -3 2 • - 38.5 LAYERED FINE SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND . • 4 • • 4' 4 18.0 • •LAYERED SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND N . . • Y • N O . N W 3 Z . • • •-:( . . W . I • . . � . 2 • O • Y 1 • • . a . • • a. • . • • • • • • 111r0 •0 • i 0 1 2 3 4 • • 5 6 7 8 1. • 0 " NORMAL STRESS (KIPS/FT2) . . • • TRIAXIAL TEST . RESULTS • . . . ' • • • • UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED I' • • • METHODS OF.P'ERFORMING UNCONFINED COMPRESSION AND TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TESTS . ' • • . THE SHEARING STRENGTHS OF •SOILS ARE DETERMINED ' FROM THE. RESULTS OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION'AND '•TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION.TESTS. IN TRIAXIAL COMPRES- • •SIGN TESTS THE 'TEST METHOD AND THE•MAGNITUDE OF THE CONFINING PRESSURE .ARE. CHOSEN TO SIMULATE • 1 I 1 • . ANTICIPATED FIELD CONDITIONS. — ' • i • UNCONFINED.COMPRESSION•AND TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION.• ' • I it . . •• . TESTS ARE PERFORMED ON UNDISTURBED OR REMOLDED' -�' 1 • •SAMPLES OF SOIL APPROXIMATELY SIX INCHES'IN LENGTH ; `` •~ I'. • AND TWO AND ONE-HALF INCHES IN DIAMETER. THE TESTS r � '. •ARE RUN EITHER STRAIN-CONTROLLED ' OR STRESS • '• .-_-_.> ��! : I . SAMPLE SU• B • IN• A STRAIN-CONTROLLED TEST THE. • • • J 1 • M ' 1 SUBJECTED TO•A CONSTANT'RATE OF.DEFLEC- . �- 1 -I i. • TION AND THE. RESULTING STRESSES ARE RECORDED: IN' . a'•'k /- `-`- : ' i j • A STRESS-CONTROLLED. TEST THE SAMPLE IS SUBJECTED '.*:---".':.:•.1 ^' _ TO EQUAL INCREMENTS OF LOAD WITH EACH INCREMENT BEING •MAINTAINED UNTIL AN.EQUILIBRIUM' CONDITION` I.,. WITH RESPECT TO STRAIN IS ACHIEVED:* • ' • . • _ - • YIELD, PEAK,.OR•ULTIMATE STRESSES ARE DETERMINED • TRIAXIAL COMPRESS ION• TEST UNIT• FROM THE STRESS-STRAIN PLOT FOR EACH SAMPLE AND • THE PRINCIPAL STRESSES ARE EVALUATED. THE PRINCIPAL STRESSES•ARE PLOTTED ON A MOHR'S • CIRCLE DIAGRAM•TO DETERMINE'THE SHEARING STRENGTH OF THE SOIL TYPE BEING TESTED.: • UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTS.CAN BE PERFORMED ONLY ON SAMPLES WITH SUFFICIENT COHE- -"' • SION SO THAT THE SOIL WILL STAND AS AN UNSUPPORTED CYLINDER. THESE TESTS MAY BE RUN AT NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT OR ON ARTIFICIALLY SATURATED SOILS. • • IN'A TRIAXIAL'COMPRESSION TEST THE SAMPLE IS ENCASED IN A RUBBER MEMBRANE, PLACED IN A TEST.CHAMBER, AND SUBJECTED TO A CONFINING PRESSURE THROUGHOUT'THE DURATION OF THE •TEST. NORMALLY; THIS CONFINING PRESSURE IS MAINTAINED AT'A CONSTANT LEVEL, ALTHOUGH FOR . SPECIAL TESTS IT MAY BE VARIED IN RELATION TO THE MEASURED STRESSES.' TRIAXIAL COMPRES- SION TESTS.MAY BE RUN ON SOILS *AT FIELD MOISTURE CONTENT OR ON ARTIFICIALLY SATURATED' • SAMPLES. THE TESTS ARE PERFORMED IN ONE.OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS: • • • UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED:•THE CONFINING PRESSURE IS IMPOSED ON THE SAMPLE 'AT THE START OF THE TEST. .NO DRAINAGE IS PERMITTED AND THE'STRESSES WHICH ARE MEASURED 'REPRESENT 'THE SUM OF THE INTERGRANULAR STRESSES AND PORE WATER PRESSURES. : .• CONSOLIDATED-UNDRA'INED: T$E SAMPLE•IS ALLOWED TO CONSOLIDATE FULLY UNDER • THE.APPLIED':CONFINING PRESSURE PRIOR TO THE START'OF THE TEST.. THE VOLUME i I, ' •• CHANGE 'IS DETERMINED BY MEASURING. THE 'WATER AND/OR AIR EXPELLED DURING • • CONSOLIDATION. NO DRAINAGE IS PERMITTED DURING.THE TEST AND THE STRESSES. . WHICH ARE MEASURED ARE THE SAME AS FOR THE UNCONSOLIDATED-UNDRAINED TEST. • DRAINED: THE INTERGRANULAR•STRESSES IN A•SAMPLE MAY BE MEASURED BY PER- ' • FORMING A DRAINED, OR SLOW, TEST. IN THIS TEST THE SAMPLE IS FULLY SATURATED • AND CONSOLIDATED PRIOR TO THE START OF THE TEST. DURING THE TEST, DRAINAGE . IS PERMITTED'AND THE TEST.IS PERFORMED AT A SLOW ENOUGH RATE TO'PREVENT THE BUILDUP OF PORE WATER PRESSURES. THE RESULTING STRESSES WHICH ARE MEAS- •URED REPRESENT ONLY THE INTERGRANULAR STRESSES. THESE TESTS ARE USUALLY PERFORMED ON'SAMPLES OF GENERALLY NON-COHESIVE SOILS, ALTHOUGH THE TEST • PROCEDURE IS.APPLICABLE TO COHESIVE SOILS IF A SUFFICIENTLY SLOW TEST RATE 0 • -41 AN ALTERNATE--MEANS OF OBTAINING THE DATA RESULTING FROM. THE DRAINED TEST IS TO PER- FORM AN•UNDRAINED'TEST IN. WHICH SPECIAL'EQUIPMENT IS USED TO MEASURE PRESSURES. THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TOTAL STRESSES AND THE PORE WATER.PRESSURES MEASURED ARE THE INTERGRANULAR STRESSES. - • • • • DAMES a MOORE h • • • • • • ch • N . _O N • • W >. • it al 4 ` TEST BORING DEPTH (FT) • • • 1 . .5 33 (NI-. 2 1 • 10.5 u 3 2 18.5 a 3 - 4• 4 33 •• • —c 5 8 ' 28 • • . N • N ' W N 2 ® )°= 34° • . ,. .; • • W O N • . - W 1 2 FINE SANDY SI •LT ta >' AND SILTY FINE SAND • • • 0 1 2 3 4 0 5 • • NORMAL STRESS (KIPS/FT?) • • • • m. . C • W . DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS • • • • • oAMIII=8 MOOR' • • • LOAD IN LBS./SQ. FT. .a. 0 +!fl �p �p d}t to #� ' e ' odP : ,�f -pciP gyp/ •. e . . I .02 :04 •• . BORING 2 P.13.5 • 08 . laimig U ' Z.10 • W • U.12 ' • 1 i r2 • Zim .m 1 • . • .. . •. . O 14 , • Q C . immujimk IIII BORING.1 ®43 U.18 • • .20 • • • i .24 r 11111111111111111 r . r Y. .26 • • BORING DEPTH SOIL TYPE MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY IN BEFORE AFTER LBS./CU.FT. . 1 ' . . 48 SANDY SILT. • • 47.3 36.5 71 2 13.5 SILT 66.8 57.9 , 59 ' • • CONSOLIDATION TEST . DATA. • 1D/uMSSa MOpRt . M .. -1 • • ' RESULTS OF. TORVANE• SHEAR STRENGTH TESTS. ' .. • • • • •. Depth . : Undrained. Shear..Strength Boring . . Sample • (feet) • .(tons per square foot) W • • C • 1 9 • 48 0.28 '. ' _ ' 2. • . • 12 . ' 58.5 • ' -0.20 • ' • • 13 • 63.5.. 0.18 .. 14.- .69 0.20. • .. . • . t m ..3 8 :. 38 ' 0.28 .. 10 45 .0..07 12 58 0.27 14 ' .. 68 ' .0.29 • • • • - 5 10 48 0.28• • 6 1 3 0.42 • 3• 13 .. . 0.40 ' 9 .43 ' . 0.20 j • 7 1 3 0.68 9 43 • . 0.20 • • • . • • -- 8 • .• 9 •• . 43 0.22 • .. . . ' • • C • W .. . �. . W'. • 1 C' ®AMtQ 8 MOORt **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/04/99 15 :47 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905562 Amount: 1, 500 . 00 11/04/99 15 :45 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #129541 SEA PACK Init: LN Project #: LUA99-156 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 362304-9001 Site Address: 1000 SW 43RD ST Total Fees: 1, 509 .24 • This Payment 1, 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 509 .24 Balance: . 00 ******* x******************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/04/99 15 :47 Receipt ******* ;******************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905563 Amount: 9 .24 11/04/99 15 :47 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: MITHUN PARTNERS I! it: LN Project #: LUA99-156 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 362304-9001 Site Address: 1000 SW 43RD ST Total Fees : 1, �09 .24 This payment 9 .24 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 509 .24 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 .1 Postage 9 .24 t,,v't • raa3 r-cA M E R . . , IC ti _ .�9 • ,.� = -- ••tea 4 . • ,...• . .'40.12.* .. . ,5:4. .\•4, • P. "'ram �/,� `" % \ ,�_ �,`, • irr i • Nttli1/4.\\\</e1.4dy:.'re--T., /IX, . i WO40, R • • First American Title Insurance Company • • COPIES OF DOCUMENTS . • • . • C '. rr CI . , . J n ' ti • , ':.•:±9 11, N y`� .t 4 - • - .. • *''f'•t%i- zo•o, .1 . •S .. •• .. • • . _ 1 —. Mom•• .• ;. ..ic k� • . _ ' . . - tom. tS.4_y .L '.-.-. .. ..S►Y'- - - • TIc011 TM!R/EI RAIa CO. I.?,t'i t • • - •t' •.fr'!.:i.VE..SURE:i.J SEATTLE.WA ES104 `�',,. ar.a m.wo re� SR =a . KING DNS N0779 E EXCISE TAX PAID REcb F 2i.00 • NOV 3 01984 CALL• wcru v.-Wi a 00 'I • • �,• _ nF •3l • . .MM . STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ila 7u 'l 32 r�, 74 • , -• O AND BY .EDI\'ISI�]'.C,s ' SELLER'S ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES:: •RE OS�i EL�I:.�'`,S o it q KIf tiCoJ.i` r: r ., ; THE GRANTORS, JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY, a Washington corpo- , 1 • I ration; BENAROYA PROPERTIES - FOUR, a Washington limited partner- ! I . i ship; and BENAROYA PROPERTIES - FIVE, a general partnership, for • • and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consid- 4 t il ' eration in hand paid, convey and warrant to PACIFIC NORTHWEST ! • , GROUP A, a California joint venture, the Grantee, that certain ' • real property together with all improvements located thereon, I. situated in the County of King, State of Washington, including r • t • . • any interest therein which Grantors may hereafter acquire, legally 'V ' • % described as set forth on Exhibit A hereto; r SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to those Special Exceptions numbered • • • * I ,. 3 through 21 of that certain pro forma policy for title insurance .. ' . • . • f` • . . No. A-330104, dated November 30, 1984, issued by Ticor Title • Insurance, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and , s ' SUBJECT TO the rights of tenants as lessees under those ' • Leila1.14 leases identific,a. in Section K of that certain rg.rtified• SSSS rent roll of November 1, 1984, which was supplemented and certified ! by the Grantors effective November 28, 1984; . - I • ':i; a•; TOGETHER WITH all Grantors' right, title, and interest in • . t{ .r'' the leases identified in said Section K of the above-referenced •_ rent roll, including without limitation the right to receive f= t rental thereunder, which Grantors hereby assign with right of r - ,••' ',','�"i: further assign.:_ent to Grantee, the lessors' obligations under • ..,-;;:j.,:-•:*.i:;;;,,‘:. ' i - )s °R k;';''.,••-•01." ' • •' 'k.?'i�r..",d':. try- _:t':.:?f�'1!?*". -;., .."' ,�'.• "'"v'' l' `: ' _ •••f�• _,_-• - .- ..a%....i-s.' .'re•e Tyl:,?,!':• .. •.;••: K .•. .,.j;•-•••..,•� :¢rf4...::, '.'rp S';;,! ,, .. �'.'. :'.•' j.. .. , s l• r � �. f - _ -. ( •�b .:.., r7•—_ .- . -• • r! f • which leases Grantee, by acceptance of this Deed, assumes and , y. 7 agrees to perform. • li IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have caused this instrument • 1 • to be executed by their authorized representatives this 29th day • •! • of November., 1984. ..1 • • 1 JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY ' • el U • ; By 7 ck A: Benaroya 1 pry is President .• BENAROYA PROPERTIES - FOUR, a •1 Washington limited partnership s v, By: Jack A. Benaroya Company, - 1 its General P ner • . `: • s • • By • ' ark A. Benaroya - Its President . , • BENAROYA PROPERTIES - FIVE, a .4 general partnership , • .e. • 1 B ck A. Benaroya • Its Managing Fartner e t. ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) '• ) ss. • r COUNTY OF KING ) . 1 1� • • On this day personally appeared before me JACK A. BENAROYA, • • ' to me known to be the President of JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, • and acknow- ` � ledged the same instrument to be the free and voluntary act and - .•'.'S' deed of said corporation for the uses and P purposes •therein .ti• • •.1i mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute • • - 1' ,`Y 2 X q. - • • • • ,. - .."'S „ ii'.• • '��a A;a' .�• • ems �••y • - T• ..� • • . • I .Ti.,• • the said instrument, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the • corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS MY HAND A , OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED this _ - day of November, 1984. . • .,q • ' '• 9/'f' ?"Z ' -- "--7"1:--- • • • • I�otar ub1i�E in and/for ^ S f , s • r -- = Washington, residing at yt. •- • • �.4. o. ,i • • Cr) c ti J . . 1" STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .. • • - COUNTY OF KING ) • y ri er co On this day personally appeared before me JACK A. BENAROYA, to me known to be the President of JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY, the 4.14 • Managing Partner of BENAROYA PROPERTIES - FOUR, a Washington limited partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing 1 • instrument, and acknowledged the same instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses and 4 , • ' . purposes therein me.itioned, and on oath stated that he was : • authorized to execute the said instrument. - �$ . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED this r r . • } day of November, 1984. • • • . ✓ � � y . . �' Notary P lic in and for th State pf :i '� • ' Washington, residing at .4.1L -1 'x1 J : : • ' :t • 4 t. `' �• STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) ss. - COUNTY OF KING ) 'a " .11 On this day personally appeared before me JACK A. BENAROYA, to me known to be the Managing Partner of BENAROYA PROPERTIES - • :'- • .- FIVE, a general partnership, the partnership that executed the • • y.',•?.,.:.:A foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same instrument to be -4. the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the •' • sr, • fN -G.• .71. ;',-if;e1„•tiff R ' •iir:,.� t:::^ • .Fib -,�ti', ,.•[ P_}r• .;1 '4-4; - .lr^I.- �s.� 7 .• •. .- J';; ø ::::a;:. . .....- - - - - -. IIII . , , tii •v V . • • ., .u.:..,... 4....;,.: ,..?...,... • . • _ ' = � ri^ • . . . , . • c‘ " . .. \ • . 1,i. .,. .„.., . . . • . . .....______. • . _....._,_______, • • . • • . , • . _ . , , ,i... . i i ,...., •... .,... ,„. . . 1 uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. /yam • WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED thisap • day of November, 1984. ! . i+ • • 'tt ‘—'—'-- ‘Zg---- otary lic in and for th Stat • Washington, residing at •�(�� -- ................... _ , • • • • • • • • • • • e • , • I • -'i .. 1 R .t.4 A p ti' "�' -'• °�'�s i�i r 't��;. ., •�l t ... - .., _ .. .. .,fit. .<7'1`:+!h..i:..i,��. .�• 1.:.1�,.. � . . • •. . . .•________ _• __....... . _... • .. •••••,......i..•• • :•___:_:"___:•._•..,..,..• ... ... w.t1h.v..._1•••••••. • . • . . „,,,,..,"..,..: _ _.... •• ... • • ...._ ..•• . . . .. . . .: ... ..•,.,...•. . . ..:".:•" ...,_.• .•.. ... :, .. :,. • . • -_ . .._ • .;...,...,„:.„.•_, ..; •..e_•••••••_ _ , _ __, . . • • • .. _ „s• . .. . . ..... 4' - .'4''' 1-.---..I •-•:-.M*: •• . • •f" ....' :.::.;'•`zi-.Z.L'o.:':;!-•' • '' .'.—', 1•-•'.:(.-..':". •..".•::"• ...... ..---------- .' • . .-••..4 , • • PARCEL A: • I• 1 THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of i • :•) , , SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, Y.M., IN KING COUNTY, g WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, , �t RANGE S, EAST, M.M., IN RING COUNTY, WASAINGTON, AND TRACTS A AND B, BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 Of PLATS, PAGES 42 THROUGH.44, INCLUSIVE, IN • N RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ALL LYING NORTH OF SOUTHWEST '41ST STREET AS • r ry CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AU.",•ITOR'S FILEII • NO. 8401050426 AND LYING WEST OF LIND AVENUE AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED - • • IN DEFD RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7808180517 AND LYING EAST OF i - j - A LINl. WHICH IS 145'FEET, EAST OF A;D PARALLEL WITH THE W ST LINE OF _ . .___ ___ . ' SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER o , . • • di PARCEL B: . • • • THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE 4.9THEAST QUARTER OF - • SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, W.M.,. IN RING COUNTY, ' • • WASHINGTON, AND Of GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, . - D • • RANGE 5, EAST, M.M., IN RING COUNTY, 'WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF • SOUTHWEST 4155 STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE CIF': OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8401050426 AND LYING NORTH OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET AS CONVEYED TO THE 'CITY OF RENTON BY DEEDS - . RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 8010060645, 8011170558, 8105270723 • - AND 8106010665, LYING WEST OF LIND AVENUE AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7808180517 AND LYING EAST OF THE r ' • / WEST 90 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER. • .r . • ft . A-330104 • • • iii . , • .• . • . . . . , . . . ,...,, .1,,.7„.: . . . ... • . •t. . ....„,..„1..y.•,••0_,.. • . .. _,.,,:...:.:,. i..„.v: . . . . . ... . ..... .:••„,.A„..... ,.,...,,s..—w • . . , •• ••• . . • .. - .. ... .., . .. •. _-5--.4..:,: • . •-Y • ts _7 � Exhibit A I`,,%:1, . ilill y,�.. d '�Rz` n ♦ ',�5�. �1^ — . _-__ .. .... I T,1/l \T a.•4.:--.yi^4'% .y .:y, ` _ Jnir.Y. ...... '�.�� ^ I :.•r4'.4 ��9 �sr�.. •• •N`.::47,:t.+ti1F%.Zy.�t1::Alt ' .y J.lt Y.._� _ J '!': ... • i ZT'4:. . :` L. }:.f ... :_.'a1r-'-- u- +y.•�-ti.�► .4‘. ...4‘. ..- > ;� y 07 ,n�.., �-.- n` •c Tat s,� ' • • • r` al Tr i L- �" I �fy:';�• rel.v;y 4+w(, Y 1111111110 • �` 0 • r. r ' • SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS • - 1. . ASSESSMENT OF S346,339.23 FOR STREET UTILITY LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MO. 302 ASSESSMENT NO. 41, FILED WITH TREASURER OF THE CITY OF , • RENTON PAYABLE IN 15 ANNUAL INSTALMENTS PLUS INTEREST AT 11.45 PER "•,•, • CENT PER ANNUM FROM APRIL 10, 1980. THE FIRST 4 INSTALMENTS ARE PAID. • THE 5TH INSTALMENT WILL BE DELINQUENT APRIL 10, 1985 IF UNPAID. ,,,. . AFFECTS THE EASTERLY 160 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES LYING • WITHIN SAID SECTION 31. • lb-GI 2. ASSESSMENT OF S125,213.40 FOR_ STREET IMPROVMENTS, DISTRICT (LID) 323, • ASSESSMENT NO. 23, FILED WITH TREASURER OF THE CITY OF RENTON, PAYABLE r4 IN 10 ANNUAL INSTALMENTS PLUS INTEREST AT 12 PER CENT PER ANNUM FROM SEPTEMBER 7, 1984. - THE FIRST INSTALMENT WILL BE DELINQUENT SEPTEMBER 7, 1985 IF UNPAID. AFFECTS SAID PREMISES IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, •� W.1M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE �•` '�`' NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W:M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LESS ROADS. '' •. 3. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be fir;.. set forth therein. • For : UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM :.•; ,= ' Ia favor of : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY; A WASHINGTON ~' CORPORATIGA • - . Reflected of record by instrument r:- Recorded MAY 4, 1979 _ ' ' Auditor's no.: 7905040686 - Affects : THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5 FEET •• :'.r`<{ OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED (u : ; . CENTERLINE: "•;,,, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, • • ''sKr TOWNSHIP '23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, M.M., IN RING COUNTY, ''1:..`' `I '_t 4- WASHINGTON: THENCE NORTH 87031'08" WEST ALONG THE NORTH it',..'.'t :. jINL OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 46.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01023'23" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.25 FEET TO , f`;. ,'it ': THE NORTH MARGIN OF S.N. 41ST STREET: THENCE NORTH k.; 88°36'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 336 yi¢r 5;f .t'; •a FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; �`'`' !• w . . , � THENCE NORTH 01023'23" EAST `�•* A DISTANCE OF 86 FEET AND 'r •`I••"- . • c7«•i: .• THE END OF SAID DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. i f•' • A-330104 PAGE 2Ir t• v' Exhibit B :1-,'•, yc •*: "., •• ..K,,.?:. .. - :y.,7 ', f�' •••ti+ "I---__ Jd•�i +CF::J�••:iiz..a._� ..i• •f_%y...v'.a' . - - .• • - _ _ t•• •-.,- ` • � :$•c•-a f S. ' r } :.' .`r �' ( �yj . .m t� 't • y `. -7� +sa _ 4'-11iA y'..,i.. r .....fC ' -'.r;L r µ 4 ,r. • ` y ' : ' i ' . a .J �— F- i•.•+r••. ,v -i- .• . -,�`3-.. e:.r r:dT t.u!•'1•. r '... '.v,F,S..r r•wP ``. %..;,.:4ti•:+•%!,._ "i::• ••`$^2r"'- 4, • -• - N a ,'F"ti046.4" v,,.,`.. r 1 . ; :i V. i :;,t. ...."-a '•• it. ' vim. "' • • 'v-y., • �• 0 , 1;• - , • 4. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as say be .. ':-.'• ,." • • - ,set forth therein. . ' � . For : UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION • SYSTEM t ' 'In favor of : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON • 'CORPORATION '� 1. . 'Reflected of record by instrument +`':•;'' . .'' - • Recorded : MAY 4, 1979 • - Pj Auditor's no.: 7905040693 • • i Affects : THE SOUTH 15 FEET AND THE EAST 7 'ELT OF THE FOLLOWING ' A DESCRIBED PROPERTY: '•'' s *- v CI OVER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE 4,._-•: • NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST ' QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, ALL IN T- " CO TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, W.M., IN ICING COUNTY. el.-. . :''�}'n'" WASHINGTON, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SECTION 30 AND OP GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION - 31, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGES, EAST, W.M., IN •• - KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ;Sr•`;,•' '' - • :.1t•: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; 4' i , • ��'l• ' "--' THENCE NORTH 87°31'08" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID -. r• "' SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 766.92 FLRT TO THE TRUE POINT ati ' • OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02028'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF i�t>fi •�r:44 ••• . ..r 1•:., 25.14.FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN K�+.\•!,.• RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 87°31'01" EAST ALONG SAID • ` ' RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 659.16 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT Of . ; ON SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 88°55'1 3" EAST ALONG ,•;::';-s:.! • ..• • '" ::;,;.,.. SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 976.89 FEET TO THE WEST gf '' a--:•.;: • .MARGIN OF LIND AVENUE S.W.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG ,SAID `r _ 'r_i'•;. . WEST MARGIN ON A CURVE. TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH ` !'?.1 BEARS SOUTH 82040'36" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2040.00 '''': u"`4:•••• �•\.tip.. +1^ � � FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 222..32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL 4 i.:L t -.t,.. o • " F.:;314:r:p ANGLE OF 06 14 39 . THENCE SOUTH O1°04'45" WEST ALONG r,G:,• .�.'•..! :i t-, • SAID WEST MARGIN A .DISTANCE OF 22.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, AN :'�:', : i. .4st tiff " . •'•rg`-+'!'„c,r ;p-'S. - ARC DISTANCE OF 86.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF , .: :•:'c';;5.r�u41,:n,; 90°18'38" TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF S.W. 41ST STREET; _..: ^sj 4/...4 THENCE NORTH 88°36'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN A 1' ' ' '`5.�`?{qr ;t DISTANCE OF 1576.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 28 59 EAST A • { i!'aj�* �.4..,• DISTANCE OF 282.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT or BEGINNING. r•�•,:; w �,. .-" _ p • :::,:: 5. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as say be '• . ; • . AF:r''" se•t forth therein. :` " 1 For : UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR: • ',+ DISTRIBUTION •''':^i• SYSTEM ' L:., ,' , In favor c: : PUGET SOUND POWER AND' LIGHT COMPANY A WASHINGTON• 5,(,',+c.: •w CORPORATION I 1. • ,e7 : : A-3301C:4 • PAGE 3 ,t :10t$ • ' ..r.. ,•:!;! ij ,.r:ice I 4.. ' ;,h l' • • 'j.: . — : Exhibit B rs�a 't."r::<..•.. Via:: "5:- .J -` - •V' ... • . :.•_• "lV:.'lr,a.• ice'• LT .e Ciy�..� «— +aS.—_,.T ... p ~Qo '"=:�17a:}; ;� •:itrC VI Fl • '1 •. • • • 0 • . Z;1 • . Fes ' .' . , , O C:Lt• ' r Reflected of record by instrument • Recorded. MAY 4, 1979 • • Auditor's no.: 7905040687 • ' Affects : THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5 FEET • OF SUCH WIDT: ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED •. CENTERLINE: • BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, ... • . TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5, EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY. Y 8 WASHINGTON; .THENCE SOUTH 89005'08" EAST ALONG THE NORTH :. LINE OF SAID SECTION 31 A DISTANCE OF 347.68 FEET; CI THENCE SOUTH 01004'47" WEST A DISTANCE OF 270.26 FEET; - , ' . •• vi THENCE SOUTH 88036'37■ EAST A DISTANCE OF 215 FEET TO • I . g THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE •40 NORTH O1023'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 82 FEET TO THE END OF - 4 • . SAID DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. s+� 6. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be • •'i set forth therein. • r • For : UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM -- L' In favor of : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON a CORPORATION •• 1j , • _ • Reflected of record by instrusent • �j• Recorded : NOVEMBER 20, 1979 Auditor's no.: 7911200626 Affects : THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 •FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5 FEET . . iyj OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED S • ' CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, `. • TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 87031'08" WEST ALONG THE NORTH . - 'I' LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 46.36 FEET; ' • I 6. , THENCE SOUTH 01023'23" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.25 FEET TO •1 THE NORTH MARGIN OF S.W. 41ST STREET; THENCE SOUTH ' 88036'37" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF. 41 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE NORTH 01023'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 65 FEET TO THE ''' END OF SAID DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. . • •t: ' } Said instrusent is a re-record of o 4 W4 Auditor's file no.: 7905040692 . . ' ' 4" "' 7. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE - . - .Y PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, DELINEATED ON THE FACE " „r. OF. OR DEDICATED BY, SAID PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK L...liPt! RENTON II .� i1 �: ,.?. • `;7 FOR TRACKAGE AFFECTS' • : TRACTS A AND B OF SAID PLAT "e.g ., • A-330104 PAGE 4 . • j J: .16 11 a., : .p • . ',; - .. • j�yy�;,,, ' F xh i b i t B L ••�f{emu ��►..r iV:••` Y .'• � ' s.>_.. Y•�%)7YA ! a, .a i .4. -1 ;=:-i:a t • •. t - �'....• -• .y 9`rn u nn.!?4 r r e' ,.ryr.•. ��.` A • • E r, ` • .Y • • • ; •'.a 0 • 8. •AN EASEM • ENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be � � • '.•'• :' • set forth therein. . s. • • , For : CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, REPLACE AND • • ENLARGE AN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM In favor of : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON. • d CORPORATION '. •i� - .4Reflected of record by instrument Recorded : MAY 4, 1979 8 Auditor's no.: 7905040695 ' - Affects : 10 FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH ' SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: • • g BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, ' 7. } , . .. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST, W.M., IN KINC COUNTY, �, ,. ,- WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 87031'08" WEST ALONG THE NORTH � '•' LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 46.36 FEET; • +} ' THENCE SOUTH 01023'23" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.25 FEET TO • THE NORTH MARGIN OF SW 41ST STREET; THENCE NORTH • •''' 88036'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 935.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID 'CENTERLINE; THENCE NORTH 01°23'237 EAST A DISTANCE OF 85 8 FEET AND THE END OF SAID DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. 9. AN 'ASEMENT.with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be . set forth therein. For : CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, 'MAINTAIN, REPAIR, REPLACE AND ENLARGE AN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTLON SYSTEM li +: In favor of : 'PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION t_ Reflected of record by instrument • Recorded • : MAY 4, 1979 • ?`'f Auditor's' no.: 7905040694 - :, i.' Affects THE SOUTH 15 TEE^ OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: :;........• :'! " • '. ^. THAT PORTION OP SNP NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEASTx �• y' QUARTER OF SECTION 36, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF • :`fxta THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 �t"r ' NORTH, RANGE 4, .EAST. W.M., IN RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, .. •. . . DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • "''./: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; • 'THENCE NORTH 87031'08w WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID ::'—e.SECTICN 25 A DISTANCE OF 1251.56 FEET TO THE EAST LINE it:: OF THE WEST 90 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; - • A-330104 PAGE i..'. :,." ,f ' • �, 5 `t" • • • lj • .. . r �• t,. iExhibit B y vW 1 _I _ .-..'-',4' j.• .U`.. !! p'+ •t ,..ram .•-. ¢ •' \ • • it ,t,:k.' • • • • , y • O• r' • THENCE •NORTH 01047451N EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A • DISTANCE Or 1.54 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 01030,31N EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 90 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER.OF THE SOUTHEAST - QUARTER OF SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 23.62 FEET; 4 , • f4s - THENCE SOUTH 87031,01N EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY RIGHT-OP-WAY, AND THE •- F • WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE Or 485.06 FEET; r THENCE SOUTH 02026'59" VEST A DISTANCE OF 307.17 FEET TO • - C THE NORTH MARGIM OF S.E.. 41ST STREET; - THENCE NORTH 88036,37m WEST ALONG £AID NORTH MARGIN A Q DISTANCE'OF 425.85 FEET; ; aD v ' THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS Or '1! • • 55.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.78 FEET THROUGH A ' • - • • CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90024'28" TO SAID EAST LINE Or THE • WEST 90 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST , QUARTER OF SECTION 36; • THENCE NORTH 01047'51" EAST ALONG SAID .EAST LINE A . DISTANCE OF 235.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. v� • 10. AN :EASEMENT With,provisions, conditions and covenants as may be �,: set forth therein. 1 I. For : PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) ►• • - In favor of : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KING COUNTY, i4 . WASHINGTON •$ . Reflected of record by instrument ., Recorded : MARCH 5, 1979 . ' Auditor's no.: 7903050655 • • -'r Affects : THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST-f•' QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, •• ti . =l 1 EAST, 'W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF ;t : GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE X `` 5, EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS ., • � ° i ••"4., FOLLOWS: • • :i'+ BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID ;NORTHEAST • 4 QUARTER OF THE' NORTHEAST QUARTER OF .SECTION 36; ;' :. ;-Meg.,•-� - . .� ....' 4;�:' THENCE SOUTH 01047!S1" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF ;,, .5.„::, , 292.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGI-iNING• THENCE SOUTH 01004'45" WEST A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; `A-y':`'` A-330104 PAGE 6 d:'! • �` 7,7 p Exhibit B • o ,tea . zti?r,*, i ,,; - •,T. r ,;it4. • . i/v,..Re.:•Iti.:Y�e !*,;•; "•L ,. . . .-.__.. 1`d.41.4�T'����• p_.._ .•.,.._. _ ..:.. ._..._. :..:.. :....._.. :. ..._„_'° := ,.; .�., .. :i..:.rt3 h. ,•L 1 • soil. &w V, ,ii` 0 THENCE SOUTH 88036'37' EAST 'A DISTANCE OF 2204.24 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE WEST MARGIN OF PROPOSED • LIND AVENUE; ;'. •• THENCE NORTH 01004'45' EAST ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN OF . . r PROPOSED LIND AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 88036'37' WEST A DISTANCE OF 2201.96 FEET, a. • MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER . , OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36 AND THE POINT OF v TRUE BEGINNING; 'a • PI AND : • THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST' A / • QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, � EAST, Y.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS � • • • FOLLOWS: ' . BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; . THENCE SOUTH 01047'51" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF 372.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ' • . THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01047'51" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 905.92 FEET TO A LINE LYING 48 FEET • NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF - _ .S.W. 43RD STREET, SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH - ' LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER • Of SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5, EAST, W.M., - • IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND RUNS THENCE WESTERLY, IN : $ • A STRAIGHT LINE, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE * -1 OF THE. WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF - GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, . RANGE 4, LAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; I THENCE SOUTH 88036'37' EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A • DISTANCE OF 90'.00 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 01047,51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 905.92 PEET; • 4 ..2. '•• THENCE NORTH 88036,37" WEST•A DISTANCE OP 90.00 FEET TO ►,."% •.•_ A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF rS..'` ' • THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36 AND THE TRUE POINT • ,{' • OF BEGINNING. : "7J 11., AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants.as may be a.N set forth therein. ,,.yJ . -_ - A-330104 PAGE 7 t:: • ••i?..:., li . . . • A "`•, Exhibit B .: o . • For : UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM En favor- of : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON • CORPORATION • % " • . Reflected of record by instrument . • Recorded MARCH 6, 1979 ' Auditor's no.: 7903060824 ' Affects : A STRIP OF LAND ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST a ' g • 15 FEET OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED THEREIN, TO THE •. p RECORD OF WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE FOR FULL le PARTICULARS. ri12. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as say be • set forth therein. - For t UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES, CONDUIT AND MANHOLE I.; In favor o: : PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON 7. . • • CORPORATION • Reflected of record by instrument • • Recorded : APRIL 5, 1979 r • . .• Auditors no.: 7904050914 Affects : A STRIP OF LAND ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST TWENTY FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST •1� •° • QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4, �flr EAST, M.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP.23 NORTH, RANGE 5, • EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS - • FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST C• • • • •• QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; • e' • •• THENCE SOUTH O1°47'51" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF . '• • 1278.87 FEET TO A LINE 48 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL •• • • - • TO THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF S.W. 43RD STREET, SAID • PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE. •y,"`,k. EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ^1. -'_.r1r4 NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION - T '.;a 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5, EAST, W.M., IN KING ' - ;r-�y'.02 COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND RUNS THENCE WESTERLY, IN A ,.i . '•�:�`�•• % STRAIGHT LINE; TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF • + ' y�: THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF• i. 't'Y.•:h' ' '' GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, • '4 , , RANGE 4, EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; �;` •• • ' .•'•• .c,1;. THENCE SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A -:• :,; ;,w,? DISTANCE OF 105.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . ,:,- + • 'r `%+•••`fti ' ^ 1..,7-t--4 . • THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°36•37" EAST ALONG SAID 'i'` ' •''r+ %,'� PARALLEL LINE 2029.52 FEET, TO A POINT NORTH 25°05'34" F •;a•: .- ` li A-330104 PAGE 8 , j.5 � . L . . .PA' +11 . . • - -i;:" Exhibit B. ':� rV';. :1t9u5:'Z•.._. .. •_, ._:.,_i�: .':S:�Ti..:'::.1�.Ari¢i+5v,._._...-. •s' �',•�;•+ emu. =��`i�fh•�-7- �_ii-/• " '•'-40.�� 4 ``. )"j.. •.) °. i, y "• Zr•�' ►- ;ice - :•y� mil' .f *'�'� e+= f.f`► °.vv�-" r- �! 1• •t. • •. ' '�Ii_ • ♦ ./•. ._ •(�E(Y' :rat. h: IA ®. . hk'. i 1.g....2.. O EAST FROM A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT - • d • LOT 1 WHICH IS NORTH 89°O3'S4" PEST 159.25 FEET FROM THE. �: ?' O SOUTHEAST CORNER O! SAED GOVERNMENT LOT 1; • THENCE NORTH 25°05'34" ! ST A DISTANCE OF 98.29 FEET TO Y - •• THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 94.04 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT `i LOT 1; , • THENCE NORTH 01004'45" LAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 761.23 FEET; - • THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF • ,t 55.00 FEET. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.10 FEET THROUGH A •• i CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°41'22"; THENCE NORTH 88°36'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2004.23 FEET; a .. t • . i ; . •,+. THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF . 55.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°35'33" TO A LINE 90 FEET EAST OF AND • PARALLEL TO THE' WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF •' • .•.HE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; `' T THENCE SOUTH O1°47'51" WEST ALONG SAID LIRE A DISTANCE '` • 'r•.:: OF 795.45 FEET; "' • • "` • THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF • ' +:•'a•• 55.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.78 FEET THROUGH A •. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°24'28" TO THE TRUE POINT OF . • • A BEGINNING. + ` 13. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be ` +. „ 7�' set forth therein. :; 1�. : !, For : UNDERGROUND PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) ,. ='- In favor of : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION •• • • Reflected of record by instrument . . :;'�; • %x Recorded : JANUARY 19, 1981 • Auditor's no.: 8101190467h.- ; Affects : SEVERAL PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES, TO THE RECORD OF s; ' ': WHICH REFERENCE IS.HEREBY MADE FOR FULL PARTICULARS. , .. ,. I 14. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as say be t ''14.• set forth therein. , . ,yr. For , :•UNDERGROUND PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) 5'-•• •••. In favor of : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - ,; .%•' • Reflected of record by instrument •_ •- �+ Recorded : JUNE 1, 1981 .� ._., _ Auditor's no.: 8106010660 _ ' Affects THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST w• QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST •E�.•; 1' • • A-330104 PAGE 9 i; t - e ; • .,. • Exhibit B wGF 1 D` a' =mo .: : �°�4,°m �L7 i 1 h `� •_,••Nit r _ . 14. l • •.. _ f',�.:• S1-. .4 i' N.l• rl���. _.•. • ``-.+--':''''-' �. • glo".:fgaTcz.. .•..`•, v Y .' . 1 f••t `' '4.._ ` . • i' I' L,. . • QUARTER OF SECTION 36 AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 • • .. ' ' • • NORTH, RANGE A, EAST, W.M., IN RING COUNTY, WASMINGTON, . - 'r► LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND FIFTEEN FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 7.5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED • ' CENTERLINE: ' , ' . , BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; 'i . THENCE NORTH 87031'08" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID : :.: _ SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 76.36 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN 1. • r1 OF THE PROPOSED RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT 1 OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF . ; SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 15 FEET TO .THE TERMINUS OF THIS �' . _ EASEMENT. 15. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be �1 set forth therein.. ^ • For WATER LINE d In favor of : CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ' ?� • Reflected of record by instrument Recorded : SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 . . Auditor's no.: 8109020546 . • . Affects : VARIOUS PORTIONS OF SAID -PREMISES. TO THE RECORD OF WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE FOR FULL PARTICULARS. yy • • . • 16. , AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be set forth therein. . • .• 4 For . • : UNDERGROUND PUBLIC -UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) ' ., - '• '' In favor of : CITY OF RENTON, A 'MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 3 _ Reflected of record by instrument • • Recorded : 'SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 i; . :e Auditor's no.: 8109020547 ,. • Affects : THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SECTION 30, AND OF � •, {; GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 31, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 ' • ! • - -' -.- NORTH, RANGE 5, EAST, W.M., IN RING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, j LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 10 ) • 4 • FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON THE NORTH SIDE AND 5 FEET OF SAID • • WIDTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED • 7 ' CENTERLINE: • BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30:' ;A.;� THENCE SOUTH 88°14'14" EAST A DISTANCE OF 387.61 FEET r. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH . 88°14'14" EAST A DISTANCE OF 13 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF '•''t''-``"•`` THIS EASEMENT. c ' • 'i ~ ;y..�'• AND . . • • ••.-',,r• THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST •'.�L T: . A-330 iO4 PAGE 10 A .sr', r 'w • ter{, • I .. • r:? Exhibit B /F` 1. • • •T_. I • '...`lt <.•. ►• ) . ;y VA .ry ". psi `a� J f`• ha y � • .. •ti, - C 1. `• � r : a! .. •111y-" ~ ' _4e4e. 3. y • ' V1(. : � 7' +1iK r � `: " - ' '.� • . :.' �.V +• +r. t . TV. r - .:-'T» ,�{ • . r J'�`! �:it1. ''ti •P4:�7tk t ' .i . 7^ L , AAp`• t a,Y.. O ':l• . • QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST .+.':y QUARTER' OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, -LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 1:-.. FIVE FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING �y,_` , . DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: en • BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; • THENCE NORTH 87°31'O8" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID i _ SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF. 1,251.06 FEET TO THE EAST LINE 8 I OF THE WEST 90 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE • SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25; THENCE NORTH 01.°47'51" • r4 EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE or 1.54 FEET; 7 THENCE NORTH 01°30'31" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE ' P WEST 90 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 23.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°31'01" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ' ,, Al • BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 530.06 FEET; a THENCE SOUTH 02°28'59" WEST A DISTANCE OF 20 FEET TO dr THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87°41'01" • _ WEST A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF THIS EASEMENT. ;> 17. RIGHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS, AND THE RIGHT ' TO CONTINUE TO DRAIN SAID ROADS AND WAYS OVER AND ACROSS ANY LOTS OR 'LOTS, WHERE WATER MIGHT TAKE A NATURAL COURSE, IN THE ORIGINAL . ' REASONABLE GRADING OF THE ROADS AND WAYS SHOWN HEREON. FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF THE ROADS AND WAYS , SHOWN HEREON, NO DRAINAGE WATERS ON ANY LOT OR LOTS SHALL BE DIVERTED - OR BLOCKED FROM THEIR NATURAL COURSE SO AS TO DISCHARGE UPON ANY ' 1110PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OP TO HAMPER PROPER DRAINAGE. ANY ENCLOSING OF • ! DRAINAGE WATERS IN CULVERTS OR DRAINS OR. RE-ROUTING THEREOF ACROSS '+ • ' ANY LOT, AS MAY BE UNDERTAKEN BY OR FOR THE OW`:ER OF ANY LOT; SHALL e+ ' ' BE DONE BY AND AT THE EXPENSE OF SUCH OWNER. .•( AFFECTS TRACTS A AND 5 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. S 18. CNTSTICTCTOOSN ON D A COTENET TFRROM NNSOUTHWIETS T REAT DTPO ROOUTHWGEST OR9TH ' TEST • r . STREET UPON REQUEST OF THE CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, • ` • RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 1978 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILL NO. 7812040682, TO THE �0`` RECORD OF WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE FOR FULL PARTICULARS. -• • ' A AFFECTS PARCEL A _- t. y ¢S $:0 19. AN EASEMENT with provisions, conditions and covenants as may be z s,x:•6 set forth therein. • For : SLOPES 4... -r ' In favor of : CITY OF RENTON :-..,..• ,• c.• r:. Reflected of record by instrument i :.••_ i"h"" . Recorded : MAY 27, 1981 !7 ..i. .. 11: 1 t . • A-330104 PAGE 11 {' '' `', I • 3:'•. I ' 1. , � y,•,. • Exhibit S %�1_`<, ' '• "••Yy,r ;.::w3. 1 • t;- • • .+ram �[ 'a • • ';-.' ,1 e t ,; +X.;; _...r r-. it-T. L.!. • •. •,S ''a.h. ;ui3>��li•�D' '•'i `,....a�.J.L- r.•,c r • N • • :r • • - • Auditor's no.: 8105270722 well . : THAT PORTION OF SAID PREMISES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF S.W. 43RD STREET, SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST 114.15 FEET FROM THE - . SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE • . • • Q� NORTHEAST QUARTER or SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH • 'y ` i._ 1°23'23" EAST 58.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; -. THENCE SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST 2067.49 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LIND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 25°05'34" ° C7 WEST 10.92 FEET; THENCE •ON A LINE 48 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 88°36'37" WEST, p :•' . , . • • 2031.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE 00 TO THE RIGHT, WITH A 55 FOOT RADIUS, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF Q 35°05'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 33.69 FEET TO THE TRUE • POINT OF BEGINNING. •• 20. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES for cuts or'fills .upon said premises . in conformity with standard plans and specifications for highway • purposes, and to the same extent as if the rights granted had been acquired by condemnation proceedings under statute of the State of Washington, as granted by deed. • Auditor's no.: 8105270723 ' Granted to : CITY OF RENTON ,,� • 21. UNRECORDED LEASES IN FAVOR OF THE BOEING COMPANY EXPIRING �� • if' . JANUARY 31, 1988, JULY 31, 1988 AND MAY 31, 1990. -- t STANDARD EXCEPTIONS •' ...' •' '� • .v.!?.•` L. Water rights or matters relating thereto.AS ' " y • ' - era ,�;, • F. Any service, installation or construction charges for sewer, . -_� 1 may;"' ,. : y?, rater, electricity or garbage removal. . ;. ' -.-s• I { r'-+a,` {,- G. Exceptions and reservations in United States patents. +, j .' H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special P Y F,.'.- n: y;'.•.= assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming fit,.';• .''•'T: , 'a lien. .. • { • • .: A-1330104 PAGE 12 .••rye..',•. • b' - Exhibit B ;.'..•;_itit .. ►rt...u_• - .7.i4(i•:1•tat'. 1 - .. • . _ --: • .••• L X14.•:z.,5-i..-'"..:•_.,, . ... . .., , , 4.. . _ ,7. -r- . . '• riiiii ♦tA�:• •,�.;: •:y... '' error .. «-... _ --i:,' i _ �._ .i _ . . �wr.'17.. .•• t^- • ` •},° •s•�'� • -t • l.t ! • •. )OHN SPEI MAN 01 ' DONAID L ARROWS . .'1+ • Governor •'f�:f' Director STATE OF WAS*GTON .., . • - DEPARTMENT Of REVENUE • ID ' • • 710-2nd Ave.. 'AD1 Dexter Horton . • Seattle, Wahigton 96704 • (2( )a64- 927 • ' • ! Affidavit -� fa a I. Jim Bennett, Regional Compliance Supervisor of the.Soattl, - ' Department of Revenue, regional office, certify that Nova.b.r 30, c • ' 1964. •• sum of three hundred twenty two thousand sixteen dollars end fifty cents. (S322.016.S0) was received from Tloor Title Insur- ' once Co.. 1006 Western Aven,a,Suito 200, Seattle, Washington 96104, v '„f for the purpose of paying a tax on a conveyance of a real estate , . • property between Jock A. Benaroyn Company (• seller) and Pacific North- • .. • • west Group A.(buyer) • �, • • .The receipt of this money is evident on Invoice Number 29050 dated " - Noreabar 30, 1964 which will be attached, with Chia affidavit, to • •'. said deeds for purpcee of indicating that the conveyance tax vas • , v paid in full on the property pursuant to Reef B2.20. j • • • The following parcels Sr. represented and amounts are shown below. F Dated this 30th day of November. 1964 • L,:i,' • Jim Bennett • • • Regional Complian Supervisor 4� ce • ti r - ,� • SUBSCRIBED NO SWO111 TO BEFOI* ME 1NIS 30th day of November, 1964 • • _ • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington . -7- �,,, • . i! . .:( Residing at Southrorth, Washington .• e { - — s . :: - . ' 4 •r s. .. ,, • •t • u., ,(•, j`!I'll J;1{ ::-,• .:} et 1,`'_ `•` : ice.• -�$)••fnj a::'.5'"fir,;' •r c J + _ •' .;of`I ,;9.-:'T= { !+. .�` °- -4t'�' • • a•r '• : f •4r•. ,.:'hti✓a'!"a• c: -', i i;r, i,"".l Wit: • • • ON SPEL M N CD DONAID I:RJ600�MS •+'1'. • c ,t,o. Direct« • •:.;;.. • STATE EXWASHINGTON : • • DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - • • • • 710-2nd Ave.. 901 D ldg.e,,ter Horton B • Seattle. Wash ist n 98)04 • (206) 464.6827 4 • • 1. f8<3.460.00 - J::: 2. 639,590.00 3. 612.305.00 1.1 • • • • 17 4. S21,400.00 •r'1 3. $4,313.00 •d ' • 6. 611,770.00 i v . J . 7. 61,391.00 ' 6. f6.366.30 ^►, . 9. 63.632.00 . - .. _—--- 10. 637.460.00 -. -_.-4 11. 647,187.00 ill 12. 649.220.00 , 1 13. 63,210.00• • Total 6322,016.60 • • } • • all " �ti • .r• r • �f3: A .ry ` .d ,'j,,'J •ks., 1. .tf. •t11.`1_•;,, et.!'.4,;^:,..1:.. :..4d,,S I-,i "i;'7r' •.+ 4 ' ' L,,, ••I rat.:J�i7t• •- , • • J Y.P,- , 1 .. .T'tT"•'.- • ,t ,4�•.. + _ 4.I• (i'y r .Ml 1_j1 •, �. .' vi—1 y,.. _ ,: •'5' •}S 4?•,;tJ r ryr �s14 • .. _. .._ • .Z1.eim:._•i....;C.2 44.il Su:.. •. . . . . • . . .., .,..1.... .....:-;...--- .-..t.,--;1., -• • • ......;,--„, ,-.:k--.'!'„ .s.,....: . .., . • . . . • •' ''..,..;"•:•.;-.. . *•';`",5):".-:•• .-:•:-..-• • . . • . . :•:.- ,•...-....•:.•,,•___2,-.:,..._.-rr:r,.....;.:,.., . • .- • .. .•-,..-7"511.t'-''Pl .'..,'•.: . .. • : :: '-'•::+1•:",• Poi"':. • • - . .-4 •• .'•-•••••'•.`2,-.;..i•z•• •. • • - .. -. . •-,-:-1,-....,.....Y..: • .- 11,4• •- . ,-• ;•:,,,,A.5:1,7 ..., •. . .!. t:. ., .t4:N.....4 f,ilifterbe^,.. • . ......•-........ . .• • ••• •-‘21';;141%..*. !... • I • , •,' ...;.••:.•.:.•''•...,."1.‘.‘,.!/...;k1.?.i.•;,,fr-..;..'.,1',i,'.;l1':-1.,i?t.e.To..•i,;.•4•.:...'.-:.•.-• i f\,1:r:(z...".4,...-,,.• lDEMaXeallepCtaeE rIetNmt WTenAat Xae ttD aDaIaeVtev IaeIa IOmN. • • • 29050. , . ' •: •6ndameng Tx • ! 1i,":. : N 1I I . • et: .• • •.• :r.•••''.7.• " .%..4.::••c•• I • CONVEYANCE TAX . • . i" •• .. ..4%:4•;i.,. ,•-••••,',-,;•-•:'.. f , • ,•..-'!•,• •-•-•`,,•&f3-1::$4,11,...; INVOICE • ‘44.. •......; •!..!:•..--4,7,:vq.rf,':•,';. . A .•••.:. . .......*:.-"•4'sg!!„„.,,,•••;74',...,„,_11•1;i3.;• Date_ii/.$..9/..e.Y- • la.,•-. . -. ' : . ;•;:g...-..,:w•i:,.4- • •. •• ,•:,,•-•- ,.....,..... • 6p4e...ift.... , ,,,,,,,t.w...„„...,..„A2 .,A.,-1. A i • 1111 • *4:f 1 .s.;N;;;',:`,iii.:1,,`., „,ii.c1,.,.;.,,• Name ••; •'•:::-...'•••.. ...:::•5:•.1•.:.:1'.i .4 i;i.t...q•it Address f": 0 i .44(-1,6-1-- aCie -0___• - .• ..• . •: . : : ';•:,$'-:•.:..iitti,,% ;4' ij,.': `U,` -- Zip..._ /° I • ..-. '••- •. •;-",1.',---,••••.:--'n-,..'1••••%••• City,State• • :•.-.':,•,:.`...•::;',,'":1-.7!..•••:•• '•••••_•:;,'‘;*:•5:::•. ;. : . ' '', ....:*•*,.....•„,..j!,',,•;:,,i,- -,..„0:;,;;;'.1?;p.2).•,. Charge . .... , ,. District No_ • • : . . • .• . i* :i.:::;;L:-,,::''.- •',:--,:;•1':•:.;;.$1.:',,`,.‘;: ::4•;....:;:'..:* Credit . 44.* ' . .'• ,-17..;:.:)::".%-i = ;0..7,..;:„•';':;• .._ __. ' ' * '"i.'":••":'.. . -.4...;L:••=:;->:7,1'.....:.':%.• DENOMINATION .... • • ''..'i-I/j7,„‘.•..k.;,4•7: .e.b.2.;,..._,..t.f"E:'•-;:: !:. • QUANTITY / • AMOUNT . ..•••..J.:.•74',-'.1.,01...?'10-.1•(.f.•:;N:::fi• ,...C7 - . .,..„.:-.:..,....F,... ;4,:•,:',:i.(.5-•% I:••• x- '...- • 0 . . :••,i,:•:x • ,....,,........c.,....1.,•,;:. ...:.."..:',.---;• s.lazis?..;• • • • g . _11. ,.,....,r :-.„ • ..--;•,:=.:-.!-.. • -.--• •• .....•:.•'-,:.i-.,-..•„-•::.,r•-.--,.•*.:-z'„.•7r.-:•,.;f,.'f:,..;.-:2;i7'.-......-:•-..,,-:;:!'417•;•••-•.';,..•:•?."_-.,,,.-.7.,P'.r:?•,..:,.::p.:,;'4::1"..,•,444f v,:.,.•y..:•.•..•,•._1*,•,.14•...k,;:,,:i.,"a.1"4 71i„•5•.,4.'„k.'.;-.‘7',...‘.e'.':,a•;f,.:.,,,.i.•,oiI-.' t'...A•,'T.n*1:•s't7'.‘.•P.r:,.:.....'.:'.....f,.*..'-•...,'•:„'.s-'_".-::e':c •::-;•.5•':"•,.•:•..1f.‘'..••"•..`.....,•..::1--.,.•4:.•...•,..•••:• -.;:.• •••• .•:',:.•.- •••••'••: -• c_-%,..-... . IiI.• 6i1,tC,!I- '-.C4•` l • $$,].0......0: 00 • — 4'::!.:. 4 1 V00 e . ' .* cscz . $ .00 e %) ! I - 00 sA , I . - . . ... • • . ,.. •..•.1 "4- *2,/rt4.!Ft'h•-•:f..". :"-•-; - — •••;i- • --,•-..eigle--"'''••.• '-'• • TOTAL • 3.2 a.Ioice I 50 . • • • - ...:- " ••••••:1'.4-1Wic••!Zi-..fr"• • .---- ---;....,:----7...- .D .- • • -• . •g• fi.F.,7f,•.,,-!'•' , Shipped By Registered Mail...... ..„....--• ,,..- - • •Lf,.9',,,c'•. • • Received or Picked U=C---e: -----•--71. - --- • • • Sold or Shipped By . • a ,, a, • . 400;:.....,.. , :.- • • • ,•.".•;.•••.7.::',•,• ' White To Misc.Tax,Canary To'Ivaxpayer,Pink To District File . .6..a roam was, ST aoos 1.•>at • . • . ., 4.r.!?..:.....': . . . -!;-1 './.'..... ..- . '. . . ..s . -.----........... . - • ..11.n.., . . r •7:'77./t.1 "• • • ..: ..,1•,:,'.;.;.'.;..,1• • .. . . • 4. . .... ..• . • ::,....4:... • . -•:::. • . . . .-• • . .• . • i • . , . •1 • 1 . . L.— .• . • ,..• ..,,•:_.... , .•. • r14 i • • • APO GET' EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM • POWER J_ACK A• .BENAROYA COMPANY, a Washington corporation, ("Grantor" herein). grants• conveys and warrants to PUGF.T SOUND POWER& LIGHT.COMPANY, a Washttig, ton core pnraauon I"Grsnte"herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual eacn'nent under,across and over the fol• • lowing described 4a1 property(the"Property"herein) K]S.__._—County,Washington. • It'' _ • . . (See Attached Exhibit "A") . E •• t N • 03 . O • Cs) . O r F:xrep!as ni i b.•otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon the t'snore;of:::,.Pr.,i,e�r:, :the•'Right• of iias..Barrio: described as follows: . A Riehi••d-Was_..__-...15..__..• ___feet in width hos•ing•.._ .._..........-----feetrFoch-vrichtrearrartntth+•nPxrrinrt'• • • !M'.,,•(••s•n!o•ri ..s failotss• . A strip of land along the north, south, east and 'st 4 15 feet of the.above described property. I 1% EXCISE TA:< ":o PEnllI�ED 2}/l ram: i1D. :.Lau fl i 1. Purpose.( r.uttee•shall have the right to consu uc:.operate,maintain,repair.replace arc enrol m'II..0,l••••$ .•l:..,,,•. trancmissovi anchor distrib-;ion system upon and un.'.er the Righl-of-Way together with al! ne,:ess,ir;. or cr.'i:venient ,y.. unn.•n,mre s therefor which may include but are not limited to the billowing:underground cord:its.cables.r.ommunu::nion 4n.'•s:va•tlo..manholes switches.and transformers:and semi-buried or ground mounted facilities Following the initial nun- of is Lu:ilihes•Grantee may from time to time construe such additional facilities as ;t may reg•urt• 2: Access.t;rantin•shall have the right of access to me Right... 'a./over and across the Property to en ib!.•Grant....mo•'xer- 1 cis,•its moo,ie:n:end,:r.provided.that Grantee shall rumpcasatu•.;rantt:r for any damage to:he I'-pr•r''.•r••.•isoil by.he ever. tiro(of said right of access. ,! pi,..r•,nt^ns•f andvaping:Grantee may from lime to tun.•remove trees.hushes.or other obstnir.non%is irh:n the Right. • f-IC.'. ..nd nice.L•ve•I and grade the Right-oL11';1y in the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the porpm s.•c set forth in ' ;tariser.pn ! hereof provided,the:following any such work.Grantee shall,to the extent reasonably pro•::.c..!ile.restore the •Righ.ti•f-'.ir. t.••he condition it was immediately prior to suds work.Following the installation of Grantee's en.lergrnnroi . r.o:ibu••s.I;r•o::,••may undertake any ordinary improvements to the landscaping of the Rightuf.Wdy.prow it d that no tree%or other plants shall he planed thereon which would he unreasonably expensive or impractical far Gnini.•r•tri term vie and 4. Grantor's Use of Right-of-Way.Grantor reserves the right to use the Right-of-Way for any purpose not inconsistent with . the rights herein granted,provided:that Grar.tar shall not rnns'rt:ct or maintain any building or other s:ri•.ture on the.Right• of.W..y sshirh would interfere with toe exercise ref the rights herein granted:that no digxirg.!unnelmc•. ,doer form of con- stru^hon,!rtivnv shall he done on the Propert•'which would.itch:rh the. -o:npartion orrroe.ir'+i;ra•,••.••s r.•••iha••s on'h:• Ili¢h:••:f•Way.or endanger the lateral supper'to said facilities:and that nn blasting shall bellow:w,'hin t..r....!,.t the-R:gN-ot• 11'ay . • t. 5. Indomnity.B',accepting and recording this easement.Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from any and al!claims fur injuries and/or damages suffered by any person which may be caused by the Grantee-exercise of the rights ,+, • herein granted:provided.that Grantee shall not be responsible to Grantor for any injuries and/or damages to any person caused by act.s or omissions of Grantor. ' • 6. Abandonment.The risha herein granted shall,.nnhmme moth'.such time as Grantee ceases to use.the Right-of-lYay for a 4 period of five(5I successive years.in which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shalt revert to Gran- • • a o.t'l.provided that no abandonment shall tie deemed to have uccurred by reason of Granter's failure•to tntially install its t • facilities or, the Right-of-Way within any period of time from the date hereof. • 7. Successors and Assigns.The rights and obligations of'hit parties eb ll iota,-to the benefit of anti he holing utmmn'h"ir r•:h•a'hl,•^.a'r:esx•JCS a^�aSSiyr.7. . R-824 FILED FOR RECORD AT REC JEST'05: i ", �K:` i I PUGET POWER mesa 0520133 REAL ESTATE DIVISION i .•w,i' ,s lCJ, 48 PUGET POWER 3LDG. _ 'Sc BELLEVUE. W.ASHINGTON PE009 L ' - ATTEYiIOB W. P. CL'JCt�t( f '•( ss .4. — — r--- ss..rc'�r .�.'— p� • • - . . . . ' . . • • . -.. . . . . A . . . . . . . • ' . .: . . . ..,.P.A.. February - it 79 is DA'.ED this day of -------•-- • . • : . . F • ... •. i : .• GRANTOR ;• ,... .: • • . JAC .7 N OMPANY • .•• • .... . . . • • By: • . • • ac A. gitiaroya, President • I" .. . t ' r k t tt • 4' . . . • • . • t . • .. s:.,T I.:OF WASHINGTON I . .1 SS , ir • i . . • '. Tr CO.frrvo#: • ) I. 1 , # CV • . • CO • . • a On this day personally appeared before me • . %Clio me known In he the individual ___described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged!hal . • 0 ..signed the same as .--.—free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.• • . ' . as r:WEN under rri...•hand and official seal this ...._____ day of _____ _ __ . ._ Notary Pubis.in a••I fur the St..1.!-I...'.•ashingtun. , . .. . . • . sTATE ni,wAsiiIN .GTON 1 . • •. . sS . I, 1. •..ii•vr) (iv i ••, 1 • • • . . (If, .hi,.., Persomil4 appeared 1...fure me -____... ... .... _ •..in-krirmn nr lin Ihn individual . described in,ind who eXecuied the within dnil form:tang rumen!,and acknowledged Mot signed the same as . .. —..... free and voluntary act and deed for the ns.rxr as writ-6es therein mentioned. • . • • • • . F.,: under tr, hind and uffin..1 •....ti the _ ._ thty of .... .. ... 19 • ..._.. .__..._....... . . • Notary Public in and bir ihi-Slain of W. -orm. • residing at • _____ .. . . -....----- . . . • . , • . • . . . cr yip-.(IF 1V.-Si IINCTON I ' I . r. ,4!.; Cl a %TV r1F, ' • . . (In the.rt,r iu.n.nnally aispnarr.ri•hernrr.me _ •.-••I n.....n.r.l...ilie inite.adird described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged t!...! . • _. . .._ signed the same as free and voluntary act ano deed for the uses and purposes the.ein mentioned • t;1%.F:\ rinrInr rn. hdrul and liii1C1.11 ,....!! anti ._..._, riay of ______ ._, .. . .....-. -- . . . . . . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. • •resicling at ___.. - .._..----_. ...... • • . . . STA':I-:OF WASHINGTON • . • 'i SS CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT • r.lit'N11 HP King I . . (In an• 77.v1.::'..s.:\ nf .. .Feb.r.u..a:rY. ...._.............._ .. . . 19 .7.9... Irr.frat, nil%ant undersigned.pers..nally appeared • I and • ..•mr•knimn ta Is•ale ___Pr.esi dent_________..._..._._ and _____ ....:... . .. ...._________. • .respectively. if ... JACI.0 A......BEWAriQXA....C,QIIPARY...___. ......__ ___.____ ••..niirpuratton that executed the foregoing instrument. and....knowledired the said instrument to be the Fr sr and voluntary act and deed of said corporation.for the uses and purposes therein . rn..n.,,,,,,41 Rift',urn oath 0.0.41!hat he was authortzed to execute the said instrument and that ilie seal aff is•M;.the corporal,seal rtf%Ott cnriirmation . . • .Witness my han.I and official seal-hereto affixed the day anti year first ahoy..written. . ' ) ' . ''' </IL' edl e eii_c_.......______________ .... ._ .. . • • Notary Public in rral frii ihs State if Washington, • • residing at _W_C{T•tf_t__ . — , , • • . • • . • . .• . , . ! -- • . • . C. F7 . ,...priel..77777-•7•:.---7.7;:-...••:•••••-7.•s-.-..-.,-ss,•s•wz.-4,..,-.7.-.7•77-••••----;771-• -7--.:•-.1';'.7;7.7..-.;:::'7.77-.7-•''''.--"7',7-7—,'",,1,-.L....I 1 i • 4i. r . : . EXHIBIT "A" • ..• 1 That portion of the northeast,quarter of the northeast quarter' of Section 36:! Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., and of Government Lot 1', Section 31, • ' ' Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, • ' Washington described as follows: • , Beginning atqhe northwest corner of said northeast quarter of the northeast t quarter of Section 36; • 1 i thence South 01°47"51" West along the west line thereof 1278.87 feet to a • line 48 feet northerly of and parallel to the proposed centerline of S.W. • 43rd Street, said proposed centerline begins at the intersection of the East Valley Highway with the south line of the northeast quarter of the • ' northwest quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. and runs thence westerly, in a straight line, to the intersection of the centerline of the West Valley.Highway with the south line of Government • N a) Lot 2 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. N. O "D thence South 88°36'37" East along said parallel line a distance of'145.39 ofeet'to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 88'36'37" East along said parallel line 2029.52 r feet; to a point North 25°05'34" East from a point on the south line of i said Government Lot 1 which is•North 89°03'54" West 159.25 feet ' -om the • • southeast corner of said Government Lot 1; a ' thence North•25°05'34" East a distance of 98.29 feet to the west ie of • the east 94.04 feet of said Government Lot 1; . • 1 thence North 01°04'45" East along said west line a distance of 761 1 feet; , c thence along.a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, an arc 7 distance of 86.10 feet through a central angle of 89°41'2?"; • t . ; thence North 88°36'37" West a distance of 2004.23 feet; . 7': i t • thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, an. arc distance of 86.00 feet through a central angle of 89°35'33" to a line a• 90 feet east of and parallel to the west line of said northeast quarter ' of the northeast quarter of Section 36; . . I ' • thence South 01°4/161' West alung said' line. a distance of 795.g5 feet: Rr / • ' thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.78 feet through a central angle of 90°24'28" to the true point of beginning. • • :. . . al#7 . • • I • ' 11:11:4:17 2. r: ` 79,,e 0tinn J6' .9 -e 7d7 • OALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: rd and valuable consideration,receipt whereof is he.r.by acknowledged,the undersigned hereby grants a e easement to Pacific Northtwr�{e+stt Bell Telephonect,operate and alCompanyspaaetWasshhiinpgton Corpo►ation, Its successors and dergroundtoConinunication L1nesLonduit, la►Id rnannoierepelr,replace end keep clear• with wires, cables, fixtures and appurtenances attached thereto, as the grantee' mam time to time require. upon, across, over and/or under the following described property situated in King ' county,state of Washington 1 A strip of land along the north and west twenty (20) feet of the following described property: ' , That •portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, ? Township 23 North,,Range. 4 East, W.M., and of Government Lot 1, Section 31, Town- . • cN ship 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, ! :It o described as fillows: . k -II- Beginning at the northwest corner 'of said northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36; thence South 01°47'514 West along the west line thereof 1278.87 feet to a line 48 feet northerly of and parallel to the proposed centerline of S.W. 43rd Street, said proposed centerline begins at the intersection of the East Valley Highway with v the south line of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,, W.M. and runs thence westerly, in a straight line, _ to the intersection of the centerline of the West Valley, Highway with the south line • of Government Lot 2 of Section 36,,Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; (continued on reverse). Grantor reserves the right to use said property for driveways, parking, landscaping • and any and all purposes consistent with the rights herein granted. - . reasonable • Grantee shall at all'4imes have the right of full and free ingress to and egress from said property for all purposes herein mentioned,and to remove at any time.any or.all of the Underground Cuml:uni cation Li nes, Coo nduit, and manhole — and/or wires.cables,fixtures and appurtenances from the said property,with the understanding that grantee shall be responsible orall damage caused to raptor b he exercise of the Halos and privileges herein ran ed., inc udi ng . I : without lmitation restoration of improvements ands landscaping on Saul property to •the condition existi immediate y Dr or to such exercise. The rights:conditions and provisions of this•ea ement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors,administrators,.successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. In witness whereof the undersigned has executed this instrument this ••..,-,1‘,.....,, day of February 19 79 y • CK A. BEN COMPANY 4 Witness- • 1. iiaC„'rY:' -d,BETTaruy Pr eb ideTTL —_ • 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REOUIPED ---- — — Ana Co. Reccrds Ci✓) on • • (Individual Acknowledgement) (Corporal.Acknowledg ement) STATE OF • STATE OF__.WASH I NGTON _ ------ ss I KING S. • ' COUNTY OF COUNTY OF _— On this day personally appeared before me On Ihis+cG�';,,r o. Feorua ry_,__ ___ Ig 79 ---•• before me personally appeared Jack A, Benarova • . to me known to be the individual_desrnbed in and who executed • • the within and .:;regoing instrument. and acknowledged that --- --- signed the same as_____ .lree and to me knot' .to be the -_President voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned ------•- --- Gwen under my hand and official.eal this .— _—__.—day of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and of. • .•,.—_____._ _..______ _.tg acknowledged said instrument to be the tree and voluntary act and --- _--- __---_ _-- deed o1 said corporation. for the rises and purposes therein mentioned.and on oath slated that hP was AMAX Notary Public in and for the Stale ct____—_ authorized to execute said instrument. . residing at _-_ In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and effused my FORM APPROVED ofperatseel the day and year first above written. • Data:. 3 /, f'i/.9q 'jli.C..,•,.. • •..�71. ., r. , • Notary Public in and for.the Male of Washington residing at '''!/. r�C•t Depzrtcent • Pa:: .c Northwest'Bell — --- t — PI T C c • • d O 0 w , • * • m D t ..1 0 0 rn s `c m m t °a _• g, ,- m o -.10 � r..�-Di 0 R, on °.o m f' W C. lA n ..• pp 1.. d N Z m ) t Vp A i5 • 4 CD 7 T� C) • a C kn o In O iVD 'Cr r. o .0 p n = t- 0 O .N-, "`r v 3 b' 0 T, rc GN thence South 88°36'37" East along Said parallel line a distance of 145.39 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 88°36'37" East along said parallel line 2029.52 feet, to a point North 25°05'34" East from a point on the south line of said Government c Lot,l which is North 89°03'54" West 159.25 feet from the southeast corner of said c Government Lot 1; thence North 25°05'34" East a distance of 98.29 feet to the west line of the east 94.04 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence North.01°04'45" East along said west line a distance of 761.23 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, an arc distance of 86.10 feet through a central angle of 89°41 '22"; thence North 88°36'37" West a distance of 2004.23 feet; • thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, an arc distance of 86.00 feet through a central angle of 89°35'33" to a line 90 feet east of and • parallel to the west line of said northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36; thence South 01°47'51" West along said line c distance of 795.95 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.78 feet through a central angle of 90'24'28" to the true point of beginning. • . I . • . . . . J -4 • , . . • . . . • • ..‘ ;• RI '. . . . . . • • . !“,:k '2... ..t.1,Jro.a 1.... ••, ••..•,•:,:, 1, .. • Litv of Ren7.on • rNT wOR SLOPES Par,. i -A k 11 11,1: .... i• :11IS !,-..""'",'"4T made thistiay of ..! 1?t71--1 19 .__ , l‘y .1:u: !‘,•!,..n...:t1 ...-. • • . N'.._I-4— • g "-- /1_0-d--, A. .---c-litif' .PA,r 1,-A ‘,"i- •k•I.%'T'n. . C'''"ft• ! ••:..•1:la::.,r .....1 lied tho ''':-..:•:1 or' and t...t:.e,..C.04,1111..y., 17;;I:.n in,,,L,tn.; hor...1• • sia l 1 oci !Ale i:t .••.-4 City of Renton • CI..i, WI;:.: ii...:1: . 'That wher,4as the Crant I,-:-in is t h... orn,r .of that ri a i a parcel A ,-..... of lind •!•-...ribed as follows., to-wit: •-.." ......_ ) C,..1 Mc No. :2:.;:a•;1 4/4 of the Northeat li: t- ',.ction ao, Tohnship .',.; No 1. • ' 4-) ---, Ran.....,s• 4host , W.M. and Government Lot • ;n :i.e :i.n-timoSt 1.'.l of Sot:: i• :I- .—, — jj 31 . Tohaisiti ii 13 North, Rage - 1:1-4t. 'C \I " SSPoi 1• . . .t . • rnd, Si tux:q in tho 1.•.cunzy of King, State ol wasniir;ton. • : 1. ... . .t has been fo:::1,! tit•c% :.• •.1..•:, in t. , •., n...r..u.r 1 o.1 -,.1 . .. . 1.•- S.W. 43rd Street IRentiii:i . ,. 1.,•-: ...,7•.':• I i•-i. ort he said pr opt!r Cy of an!,..! :.•:- ..•:r;; „ild f i 1 1.;. I., • •: !„. . .,.., tort ion of the ahoy,: doscrihed . zn,...: , :,:: riho.: :1-: Col low--.: t1 :•:t.-....i:min dt a point on the proposLY. :cntori:nt.. of S.Ii. l'•rd ':troc: . St.-.cri.,cd m xhihi t "A", '..)Lith S8'30'3"" i:1-:: 1.1.1.',.• Coe Cr•,•:•. •,!•,0 -outinst.st corner of t'....• ' •rtheast 1/.1 LI1 the Northea,• I .1 of sai•'. Sect ion 3!:; the::•....• •-,•:•::-. •!•"2-....':7)" i:ast 3ti.!!!) foot to I!... Truo ••,.:! 'of ietzinnin:.: t i...ti,,,, Soul:: .- , ;:.' -,— i.as: 2110-.4'.1 Foot to ',ix ',..,• ',.. :•!••• I in... of '..in,i \voniiy. t'...•:;•:;• ..-;outi: • ...; ..f.,...1" est 10.92 foot: thence 1: . i:1::' Is feet North of mid : ir:,:l..•1 .1 . .• ... 7:: ,aid ,fentorline, North :.; .;o'7,-- ',',.-•• , 2:17,I.4S 1:..et I'' :! :-.,int .“.' ..w,..:1 i . 1 . .i.::•:•: thenco on a curve let i i It: : : 2 T , • :• .1 -1:; ft`r1:' r:Ik:..;., :•:'-.;;•• „1:1 . ;• .q. 7•F"'"S' IS", al: tr's• .).i!,•`.:1• •• ••: . • :.:•.•.. : '. ..!:...• ::.;. -H..: •.: •. , . . , 1 , • . . • r.. , H.,... ,. .1...:•!••:• .• ...n : •? • ,.:• •:i•••••., '..• • ..i; : ,/' ,.. .• . , . .•:. ,, •• .. .„,LI .::,,,,,, -.., 1%, ..).• • It i:i . ;•: •;)•.: t y as i•-.•1•-•i..'•••:.•: •• .•: • : :::. h• co:1- ,, . . .... .•! .• ! •••.:•••••••••••: IS i I ..!:• r.:.•!..! !. i ••:•••in .•:.,:•:?.•,1 had !,,•••;, .... i .i:•••: ',..• •.•.•.!..Mnat i,in , . . , ..„,„ .•,•.•;,,„„.n..! r !•.;•:.:-.••nt- :. •,i:: .i at,::•••: •.: i is : :..t, •: ....:.ii i::•,:t sl::. . :• •.' ' "'''t".I '..: .11•:,,t1 ..;..! :;:1•!..,-t.. td :1: :!:,. :',1 i'I ii••• ..• r•••I., t.:•.tt. ;.1:;:: cd,'•• :on:. • • , • .• • . i . . : • naF. :.o. r; eivOn. tu and ",,, rtod 'ay C; ...n.00 :....0..jo.... 10 or.a npon rho :0110wing conditiotls, ': ••• :.:• ! ••.- •ajd 1 i;•,•:,.. ••:. ..•.‘•.• • • ,i1 •• .••: ! -•.••! ••!' • .11 c ca so ! • !••• •:••••• or . ,. .• .: . , -- ., ; ..:•,! i.• 1,i i'. .•-•...y !•:.• .••li••••. t !! .• :...::•• ,.'..••:••,,, • .:...:.,;••;!, ' :.•:1 .1; •. . .: : ..:1 :,•• :s •:!.....,•r :'.i:. • •• • ••:.:. .•.:..,I I •!.. :• .::t• t !••• n;:i .: ••:•! ..',)iti, And such • • • • •:. • : ••• . • : u-1.• •I. •1' •••• - ' ..• I y : -.•••'..I: :.1 t.!.o .: ,•:!ar, •••:cros,:or a r.s •-•:wroof •• i•' *: •,:',.: LP,' 1...:• .!!!:.) •i,•,::•••!..1 i : ; ,•••' .l:.• ‘'...11.• .out . : • : .: ..!...-....t. vt ri t ton. .56,... ,••t •_.,.. A /rt..: •ft, :(2A.:/..ei .. i . . • . 1 . . •1 7 • ....nXii.1 Al •Fit KelluaS1 I.i i• • ; "‹.-,' I - 11--%,..... ---'(-4-',--1. %'LL.C.1.4.,711 • l:PANTI•IiI / : • L-..•-•"`•.' / 1 4.•.: • ••••.. Qp.•41 Ornpprly nivicinn •)- ...1, .. . . . _-.._.-..-. . . .. . _............__ . . 01 •••: i: •:•:,:: .: •••••/...•ii I Nu;i t):: ) • ' ' li 'LI :.: :• "K K I NG ) s S • • • ..•7' . ' r • e . a :.:.ir. day p,rnonally Jppc.ir,d hororP me_ • I: • • - • • -- - .._ . .- .,..'r — to mo known L bo c the individuals v 1 .. _ i. , in, and •:17c;; - • exec sitedthe •...1 th in instrument and acknowledged to me that chey . C105..,'::i-b..-.d. signeA the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the t:ses and pirooses • • . ••.•• • • ...1 ...... • ..I. L 0'.eri.in r.ontionod. rzt ..` Ci'.en under my hand and of f icial tel this _. day .of _ • . . .. IR.Wk.', 'ih IIN .:1-Tapv PWALTr in 4.,d 1,4.- th, steirn nf • • • • • .• STATF. Ie..%' . • (rnunry of..._ • C4 /L4 • . .•. D• _5/. icI ,r• • * et \”!try lr. •laid ...r 11.•• :4! • , : 7 th.IN COM 1•SIO:':',1 r". dac In 1, - , %nn . •• •• C.Z2- tri•: known 1.1 of: f).: " • _ ••••• b.--;/VZ).Q:: '•`. the r,:rpor•ition :h..; ,x,•• 1 i;••• I..TL iiT.t in517t:ro-ol. n1:•1 •! •n! !•• 1,0 '1,1• frt.• Aral V thin tary act apd dr. : LI! iorp";:..ion, for Ow „:. , stmed th,,,t Iit,,f_ • _ authorized to L'XeetTIC the +.!:•1 • ••• .•!,.I ....1 . . •p.),.tt..• ie.11 Of Siild C!01 po rat a,; h Ind and official ltr.,•' • •116%, • •i• 1•1•:. / , : • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • ' I � s I I - CV ti •• • . !.'a. •. !,.. :;t rrc•t. •!i it't' h i .i ..it I i!!‘. c•f iit• . ,1. : • .1 . ..:11.'•l . • .!I 1, I l .:1 _ • , • 1 .. i 1 , .' „ „ , • '. .. • • • • 1 • +; I . . . . . . , 4 . . . . . , . . • .... . • • ' . 1 . i 0 *, . ' V CORREC-EC ::ATER LI!;;-. EASEM7NT . v.' • •. , . -.. ' 1-. . 21' • THIS INSTRYM:UT is :-ad? this / -,_.1 day oc Jus.y, 1?Fl, by dnd betweer . . jAC..-; A. ,ii..:4AR Y,', OMPAY, a Wdsnin6Ton corpor,t.A. 1, neTeinafter cilled 1.1,antor", ari tne CITY. OF RE - N. a municipa: ccrporatior of .inl Countv. !ashinoton, hereinafter ailed ^,rantee-. This instrum,nt rep..ices and 1: supersedes a previous easement dated December 14, 1971 . recorded under • Auditor's Plle ';o. 73030506'48. • , . . •,.... WITNESSET:: • •••,1 .. .1 . Ca • Grantor, for the SUM ...: Sia.00 paic uy Grantee, and ,I,ler value.ole • C..; . . f--! consideration, nereby grants, baroains, sells, rnnveys and warrants to . ,4 • Grantee, its sm....essors al;c' ass inns, dn :2a7.emen: in ,sncer:rcund public • ...... utilities :incoluuing water -If sewur; with necessdry apourtrarces includir.., --I %.-.. eistip[.; ,urf c.: ord above ground faciiites 1,-..• .1, hydrants and meters, • under, throw: „icrOSS and LID011 Certd i1 ' : 'Ni••••• ;•.;.7.1 11' *:ing COUlity, ....'ashi' .: whicn rignts-nf-wq are more particularly d, -ri!...,(! f'n Exhibits A, 6 and r. annexed here•.) . 1 ,.1 , 1..i . i!.5 sucz:essoffs ur .':,. ).:,.,.. :.aii ;la..., tnE c13,t, 0rot ir.stiL,tien of sLit ol'.i7roceedino at law, at sm.. ' ''::c.s 3s may be reas9r,1,., and necesri, to el;ter UX ''. 1t: riOts-o:-wa: *., ,- •,:- :.‘,... •...-•.e T‘f mairt;Ji..io':. 1 -,:.airing, ..ilt. Hog or rr:cc,r.ltruc'.in,! sai ', .i; " , .- ..ikirq al::I. . t.ierPtc.. 6itnout incurring leqdi obiiGdti..- •,- H !: ' HI/ tnerefor; 2,-ciliJ !. tne sorot snarl be.acomplisheo sr. t".;:t 7i..: . ..., -.70-cvements istin,; . . Ye ri:rts .c'-wai shall nr,t bE ..!ist.,- -; - ii. ,:, 3•st.,r!:..-- : .--r :':•-a.:: :.. r,ey ..ill bo r': ; -, -,.. •r • : .:: • :: :i• i. , . . .. .. r,:lains toe rir.'. 1. • . . . • ::. . . • . ''... -1 :. •• • -.. ,. . .,:- :'.....' Str. ... . /•t..:.4. .•:•:.• • • . -•.• ••;•,••:..?!•t 'C. ••1 C 1*.•••1•1.11): r.,111::' •' :' ....11C- ;l'%•: 11‘..: •'.- . ' :!"-: ' '"• .'•.11.7.; .•, 11. ,.:.1:.• ;C-1-'".• ,i'••: .3:.,1';11. .' .• .:11',/ : 3r-..; t• •'. 't • . !..",: ••-,i•r ' '•:: 31 •:./i., descri:.,e : bri-si.t!rt. • • i. :,:.! ,......' • •• • • . • ••• ;!, • • . - ... :.:•i..'..-4;::(.!•-• :...'Ll.'.: • - . • . •") „••.• ?, ,,,_, ':.(-: •. . . • ;i..!1 . ....,..r.,:t.... .• . • . ' .. . . . . • . . . . • . • , :,‘,. . . .. . .. . • . . . . . .. .. • . .... .-2- fi-12/>" . . --... .. . . l'/I • -'Y .1,.. of Ju.i y, • ):•.: , . • • ;11i,1 I ;', 0:111....L1 re,: ne• ',...: 1:.t' - IL. :Li r..C.41•• • . ::: • tat i!e .1,. . auto''• 't: : : • , t:11 ':'-'• '..;,:nit; till.: *Or",-.3ir.i: . i' st.r :i..r". -. :.,nalf of the cornorati, h ,':. it . fr,i. ;wic voluntar%. :(-7-. tod :...%.: :•••r• -_. -. ........, AL.: ;Jur:xisas i;.L.1,:.f :!„• • -.i.. ,-; in. . . • . . ' • '' ) , • .• , k....- /k:- c. c ( / C. :,.7.-.R.T. T'LiE•L IC. ir.1 .11:,.: 'Cr ''.!':,2 `....-..o',..1 ••J f ' •1 ...., !ri 11..;con, reSi.:ino at ?...- ' . . • :•:• ' . .. .• •f..: :.:; i;Z:.ixf,: . • • ..- .- ,•:- :,.• .. tl• -•%•,-, ;,••:• :. ...-.: -..".. ,:....i. . . . .." .., 4...: ;,,..:, . • . ii.•"...i..,.:•,..i•tre-,, . • •,•-•-:1•91........ •.'"4'...:••iv.-.'. 1 t r • I 1 . • • r• t• ' WATERLINE F.ASE'',_.:r t Located around the peel i ter f . Buildings i, ? and ? • Benaroya ..:isities'i '3,•. „: , . .1. 1 • .�V • • ..1'• •1 ' ..1 r • • 1 , Ir . . r:,. ..i.: l:. _ . .ic..:1 .': , 1-,,:. •• • i',.. I..:n:,., .. ... • !'• .. . . . . . '_l. : .. . .. ' ,.1 •. . • :I . 1,.. . .. .. r . • . - . . . i' i • . . ' • • . , . • • • • • . • • • • . . , . . ' , . • •• EXH1B1T F _ . • i, • f .1 flATERLP.E EAMENT • 1 • Lncated between '24ildings 1 and2 3e •ar.,:a L':, j$.e,, ?ark, Renton i • t A • . 7n.':t purtion o7 t . rortneast ci,:arter of tne nor:. -.( niarter of Section 36, N.i..;• ' :ownsnip 23Norti , R.,.mie 4 Last, '0. 4. , !n .:ing Counrv, Washinc:ton, deccrihe • ati f-illo:y:..: • • . J-: • ---' lieqinr•m_; at* tne rortnwest corner of sofa northeast uart. . of the north- n ... • ist' quarter of Section 36: therce 5 il -''711" '.4 alonq tne west line th-ro.:f dIstaft'.2 of 1,27C.87 feet to a line 4; feet northerly ,-;F The oroposed centerline of S.W. 43rd Str%rt, caid Drcposed ceterli:. - .N'.., at the .1., !Itursection of the East ';',: ev irlrivicly with the sot n ifr. :•f the north- . . east quarter of the northwest $:,h1rter of Section 31, Townsni:1 23 North, • RJr.ge 5 East, W.M., in King Co.:: ':/, Walhington. .1.1c1 r -- tnenLe westerly ; • • 3 straiqnt 'ire to 'e intersection of the center!--i •;:' the .lest Yall,,. i . iiighway wit- `.le south lint- of Gowwnr.ent : it 2 or St t•.:'. ..,6, Thwns6io 23 . . .*.ortn, Rance 4 Last, —M. , in 0--. '2.ounty, Washington: ' e$"'.:e S' • • a 10 said parallel : intr.' a cistal , $ e 7.3$.:..87 fei,t tc, .. - 'r-,- oir,t. of : ,:cirning; thence continoin • • •• 3...... li' E a distah:,e . ,. 7eet; ti,or-ce • • distan$A, Jr _; 7. ' fe.,-; • -:c S ,7.i',•.-;C'7 ' ' i 0.-$, lf ' • 4%'.:.)1, eet; thence '0; ..• —23 E a •!istance of • ! .1i-,tance of -;:2).00 fee:: 7.,:nc :. •1 3323' E a d!,.ta: : 7.j4.• Feet: • (, • tnere S S6'3t-..'37" E 1 .:', -..in'....:? ' ". ..: eet; the—:., % • : ; I 1 •lif.t.:n:.:. . - • : • .G0 '-e0-: thence '. ...: .:. . " 0 q nistarc,, c,' - - :: tnen,e thence S :.. • 7 ? kt.lhr..? ,-f • • - J. ';i.e:.: tnenC0 :; 1 -:' '.— E .1 'z ... Gr ... . '. '' .:' . : 7' ''' . : 'fi - p.s.- :- ,:).2'. .• • ':: --. -., % • • . • . • ' . ! .i- :,-„, . • ... . • .. .: •ef,..:, t..,,Ln., . .. • • • . •• it; ••— ..• .!I L 5'.:.S" :. :. •.:: .: • • :. ,. et !'.. -''• -• .• . ".. - ••?"?1,. •. • • • • . • . . • • . • . ! . k • • . . . . . . • • • . ., • • • • • • • . ... . . . ..:::.1..' . ...1 Vis ..1.1....,.::.: • ..... IIIIMIIIIVIIIIIIIMIMIIMIEIIIIEB, '.•:'..i ?.'1..;`,'''''.72': : .. . . I • • • . . 4 , • . . . ..9e...-1 . , . • • • • . . . . . EX;-;18IT . . , • i ! 1 . • dATERILIW EASEMrlIT • Located hetween Buildings 2 and • ...i.) t/ Poqarii:a ..:',. tress Park, Rentor -,..7) • .-\• . t . . ..1'. ......, . . ._...,; Tnt :ortion of Government Lot l , Jection 31 , Townsnip 23 urtn, -:ange 5 E,,,t, ,:.M., in in County, ;•;ashington, described as foliows: L.1) • 'I ' 3t .inhing at tne nortnwest corner .4. the nor*.heast quarter of the north- eat quarter of Section 36, TnwnshiP 23 Nbrt:;, Range :: E-tst, W.M. , in King • County, Washington: tehnce S 1.11'4751" W along the we---,t :in,: • f said northeast quarter' of the nortneast ki,..:arter of Section 36,• c ,:istance of feet to 4 line 4;-, feet northerly of and ...araM.,: :0 the proposed centerline of S.A. .ic:; ';tree!, said proposed cer7_e'r!ir,.. 7.,eqins. dt the . interseLtion ne of t East Valley Highway with the soutr l :.,e of the north- . east quarter of the nortf.4est quarter of Section 31 , 7%.ef• .nip 23 'Iorth, . . Range 5 Eat, ./;•.;-! , in ::ing Count', Washi-„;ton. :Ind runs Thence westerly . . .in a straight line to the intersection of ,r.e centerlioe -1' :•,,e ,iest :alle, r.ighway witr, tqc couth line of Government Lot 2 . • . . 36, • . 7ownship 23 North, Range : Last, ..X. , in King County, ',,J.:,,,r7t?;;; •,.herc.c .8—)6.37" E alonfl s9i'. :larallel line a distance of : ,- , ., : :.•!et t:': the true ;Joint of I•eg ihuin ; tnence cortnu;n3 S ,:'36—:,.' :. .! jianCe :If ,33.77 'feet; tnence :1'23'23- E a distance. Of 53::. ' :- ,.... ;.r.c:-.;:c• ffstanc of ,:3.,30 feet; thene '1 'I 23':3' i' .: distanc • .,f 10..,":0 feet; ter.ce :: •••.; ' 37" 4 a di•stancr: raf -2').- ' ''.."..'.: thenCt' 3 e of 365.:.2; then::,, % ,:,':!. ",^' '":” A . :".,:.::r.-: •:: .2.77 Feel, ;-.:e: :e .; .1 ::3'2.3 w a distance nf ..:::....... '.:,...* . Znenc.e ' .1 :-.6.3627 ..., a clistanca of 7'.5:"! feet; then,. %. ;"•:.E.., ee--; t"e-c.:,. .i ::: ''.',f':—_':. : •'.1 6i!,tanC,-., .,, i . . .'• • . . . . . • s :s23—.:: .: .: ,,:-.,:e c' ..p.j.:(.. feet; tnenc,! % . . .. : ;•,:: :!•(..,• feet; ti,.!!•t ' I ?:•:::::" ,, Ii3:-.dr..::, ., :. . .... • '.. ' , . '... •••••;' e,: ' ;7. E ..! :;;,-.••::::....- •';' ::-.-.... cent,.• trence . ' . •. .. . .• • :. .. . ' • --... . ',. ..-. :!.t,nce : . .;:. 2.5.,'...-,7 ' E. a di stance :..r ; - '..,.' : ' C:.! . i L'',.::3: ..: .: dist, ;ce of :.•;:.:) f'ePt; th.!" : % •:::': 3;— • . : •,. :is-.a",.., “: i.:.:::, fee•.; :!•-nL:. : .11 '..-.5'2::" 'e; a dis!..in:., „F ',': ' •! : —en..:,: : . . I: ,1!:.%;ni..e •:,r. 1 :. '''..; feet; ttt:r::. ' ... • . .: •:''.:.an;,.:! ...,-• ...:7. . ',e: :. •. • -r::,,' :,Oint ,.:' he•linnin'i. . • . • • . . • 1 . . • 1 . • • • • • . • • • • • • . . • • . . . . . 1 •:-• • • . • . . .. • . . .::':-:•:1-•:,..':i:;': • ••,'•0•IA•0-:-, . .... . ;-;;,-,-..-,*..- •fs. • . ... • . • . '••• . _ _ .... :: - ..• • .. . . _ ::— • - • - • r i 0 .• i mg. . TUR ECORD Al OBI OF • cU 057;SS & SA 056-85 OFT10E OF11ECMt DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENAI93S1.. 1 . *0737 E O IENTONMU KIR RECD c 3.00 j 210 1 1 caS ram**e,00 • 1 h�•� 55 • WHEREAS, the BOEING CORPORATION is the Lessor of the following real property in j the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached Ihereto. i . '• r WHEREAS, the Lessors of said described property desire to impose the following co ' [— raitrictive covenants as part of a Site Plan approval granted by the City of Renton as to use, • • present and fLiture,of the above described real property. i V) NOW, THEREFORE, the •aforesaid applicants hereby establish, grant and impose i restrictions and covenants hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, • their successors,heirs, and assigns as follows: PARKING ARRANGEMENT •• • 1. The existing use on subject property shall be terminated should the present , ' - parking arrangement cease and adequate replacement parking not be provided. , . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and ,.xpire on December 31, 2025. If at any P • time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the • covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances ,.f the City of Renton shall terminate without necessi'y of further • documentation. . .._ . • I• . • • • • • • Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal • procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. • Cr HN JOHNSON,FOR BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY N a • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. • County of KING On this g day of October 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s)who • executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said percnn(s)for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s t my hand and affixed my official seal the day • • and year first above written. ) Notary Public in an ror the State of Was • ton, • • residing at Seattle • • • • • • • • • ew • • • • • . • 04 • • • 1 • • . 1 • • • • • • •• • • • EXHIBL. "A" • II rs 01 r- • . Legal description ofproperty(Urnomspacsisrequired,atlach a separateshae0. CD PARCEL A: That portion of Government Lot 31, Section 36, Township 23 North, • Range 4 East, King County, Washington, lying west of the westerly margin of Lind 00 Avenue and north of the north line.of S.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. • PARCEL B: That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres • Parkway, less City of Renton road right-of-way. PARCEL C: Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park • Renton II as filed for record in Volume 111, page 44. of Plats, Records of King County, Washington. : •. • • ' 1 I • 1 I . • • • • • • • • TI�1IlltilC'I ICI'(ri�C()I11�)ClIl�' • .. 1 September 20, 1985 560i Sixth Avenue South P.O.Box 80326 • Sealt.'a.Washington 98108 City of Renton 206/62-4750 City Hall Rentow• Municipal Building i 200 Mill Avenue South i Renton, WA 98055 r Attention: Mr. James Hanson • r • O Re: Boeing Aerospace Company • File No. SA-056-85 and CU-57-85 O U) Dear Sirs: • jAs requested in your recent discussions with Mr. John Johnson of Boeing • Electronics Company, we are writing to confirm our mutual understand- ings regarding the issuance of a conditional use permit under the above-referenced applications. Specifically, the Hearing Examiner required a covenant to the effect that, if for any reason Boeing's leased parking facilities were no longer available to Be^ing for . __ __—— _ _— _ _parking, the permitted use. i nthe Trammell Crow facilities:wou_l � = .— dease-,- —.--- ___.___ _- - and the property would be restored to a use consistent with applicable parking requirements of the City. • • This letter confirms that Tramm^)1 Crow Company acknowledges the requirements and conditions of the Hearing Examiner and will enforce and comply with the conditions in the event the City requests. • By its joinder in this letter, Boeing also acknowledges that upon the City's request, the existing use wil be terminated if the leased • • parking arrangement terminates without adequate parking. Sincerely, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, • • by/frame w Co ' I)j r; .1r., 11101 Bruce E. ford •J §Cp § • Partner J, )gg� BEH/JB;bmy • �( .1iNG DEPT- Agreed: BOEING EL 0 CS COMPANY By:``J hn,�� aFin /Gz-r."li Date• Si,S� `� irector of Facilities • • • • • • 'I • . .. . • • • . s..- • • • • . . .• . • • C.) RI r-; I N A L • • . , • .. - . , • . 1 . • . . "EfGET EASENIi_:....FOR UNbERGROUND F.:ECTR:::_SYS FIN •• I . • ( ,P 0 kr ER • f i : , - For .an, 311 consideration of One Dol1ace($1.014 en:1 or .. valuable "- f considfirati•nthe receipt of whichTis h.'reby acknowledgeC, f PP.CIFIC N.::1-1THWEST GPOTY? A, a Cakiforniajoint venture . _ • • • • . • . : '.1,'•,-::::- h....reinl.gran:3 cw....e...s and .....•rr.... tn Pl'rlET souNn POWER & LiGilT et P lil.••.;:i .. '...'l',.i.-.,the. re• n :'Grantee- herein). for the purp• es h..%dial,ea..: forth a perpetual easem,nt Cr..or across :. i e. thc f•: ' lo.•irti?Sescribnd real property(the"Propert)' herelni .....)ii-219___County.Washington . e.Thos portions of the Northeast quarter of the Nc.rtheast qudrter o'.: . tion 36, Township 23 Norr.1 . 7.ohge. 4 East, W.M. , in Kirv:: Co..loty, yr..:.'hington, and of Governmeat ... r. 1, Section :1, Township .:7 Nort.:.., Range 5 Ea.t, w.n. , '.n King County, WasLingten, lying south uf ' . . Southwest '1st 9,:roet as conveyt?d to th• City of Renton by Deed ,... recorded udder Auditor's File No. 9401050426 and lying north of _ Southwest 43rd Street in conveyed to the City of Renton by deeds . . recorded u:,Je: Auditor.t File N . 8010. 0615, 8011170358, 310'270723 and 8106010665, lying west of Lind Avenl,e as dp-7in. 1 and described in dnc:1 'recoided under Auditor's 1: 1,-' ::o. 7 .':q.';ig05211 lyiL.g east of the west 90 feat of ...a...1 ?4,2rrneast quarter of the 5,orth-' as..-. quarter. . . . . ' • , . ...r.,;as may ha othrrwise••:'ionn here.... ,r.--epr's r: it.•,a::in ,.a.:-:a it.it.•' .•t • " •F it, F.: .-.!. i.h,'...,..:•,1- . • :1 ....:.........a:'.4.',:••••'it..mi•'...icriI:eri as fr.;:,,...... ...4.---,...40..rlare'mr.-_:•--.-. .7.7.-•-7.7.:_--!---•-'--,...i-44- •... •l••,..sop4-seati.::'I-•,4•4 Me:: • - . . - -: • SER. ATTACHE!) EXHIBIT ";:.". . .• • = •. . •- L' "--* ... • . . . • - 1..... r_Y..-.:,..ii7. "...I.v ' . • . .• - ' • . . .. . . . • . , . . ft;ri i,,•. :. /. - • i7 .. I: /. ,•/LUZ 0.' ' . ... '.......t • 1 , . e.._,....,.,......,.......... • •-••••1:.-..., 44-44 .C.0"t • —--—-.- •—-—__. .—__. • . : 'Puipose.Grantee c"Ili:eve ito...•,..-.to constrnet..:.;•,rabi in. tilt,repeir.....pip..an,!..-1.4;.._an tui.:e57-..iind electric ::inmtss,on and/or din'rRei..on i.:.rt•iii. ..:pri...end ..ntle• the'..ziglir.of•%-:.......in..,a).-: ...;:h ...; a•.....,,ir..• :,......eirent np. ,•,:itec.ances theri-kr,which!nay t-...i.ii!..l...•,;••nat;.70i. ::••, I f- in nrider..r.,•eai c,• 'ie:.....,:•i e. :,iii•municatien linos:vs,u113.manholes.swi,Lhes.?nd transrnrorrs.and corn'hnrird or mound mat let!facilitiV.reilmeing the initial con.' Of its facilities.t.iren...e;nay team ...n.••, n re •-.n..i.t.,:t •-•.1.....it/a...nal Ia. .• • ...itoo, %.luau_. 2. Ames&firardne shn!!have the righ.rf erce.s to!hr.lbeht-..4-Way over and acrons the Prorierty in enable Grantors In exer. ch.^dr,rights hereender.pelyale.l..hs' .:•!nt•t;shall-o-nirmsato 1:7710tnr for any Ow.., ....,''..Pr.....ariv...10;e:i hi.!:,...,...,,,.;.. • ....e.:d said rieht of access . .. . •-,. Ohm:La.:ions;Landsc.iiping.Grer.ive Te.. Ir-r.:. -• -.•...---•••••-•..e trees.I..r.hei ..:ei.:,!:ele.•••..:.,.,...,.i.li.n the Rii.ha ..:I.. and may le-el and zrod,tha F.....bi.,•:•'.•:. to....... --a ro,,,;•,r1.6 ne-r,,,......:. !.. .-...”r1, to:!i..•:.:: tows set forth in. ..•i:-.j..b.`,h...;..cf.prri.4d.d the:'••'i.e.••ri; in.. on-b....e.i. Crantee s''ail.to the0...i,,i;';• .e..:..s. •dr,•:t..3ilt,fctior,:l•• • • ••.,...d -Wit to to the condition it icot itn.ne..liat...l.. ;‘,.er t.......r.b.v.ork ::..:1.',....lng the mmill iti.,:i of Grantee's undcr,rourel I..d.,iee.Grantor trio ontinmaka ans.ordinary in-or..:'.on,n'z to:he landucarina of iip!l4:0!•:!•of•••'.ay provoled that no tares Or -ther pierus then be placed th-reon....l.....h....ea., la 1;:n...i.sunably f IpPirr.,in it:',r 1.-. ,, f,r Gr7.•itee in retntive and restore. • ' C. Grantor's Ilse of Right-of-Way.C.,•r!ot I••••••r.-s 01,r:ci,l ia ase:he llighl•01.U.e.l,...at., ;•••:;:•os.!w,':o4,notsteni wd:, the rich:::he:em granted,providna:that':74,..i.;...1..III t••'i r.',47..••.•.•Ittll'11.:1:...,...!.:;!•!.-:7••••••••-... • ....:,..0.,. • of.1.•.'ny which v..ouiii interfere with no,.,,,,ase of the rig:1bl.r.e'.n rran',:ri:that ri..i.;:Kzaz.renre•linc 07 n'a.er form of con. ,.lruclinn activi iy rhall he done on the Pri.perry a..b.i.-h wtinid disturb 11-.4 compaotun or nceerih Grantee's Inribties un;he Riaht-of-Way.or endan3er the literal,u:;et::-....,i fAcIilq,:,,.-ind that iv,blasone sh i'l l.-skr....s‘ahin 15([4.1 r.i 1:1,rit•t'•.....% ',Nay, • . . 5. Indemnity. iy ec,..ciiting sind retxrchr?;- li••.•11,1-0r01.Grenip7e erees to indeir.nif,Aipd:•t"•;,: al one Grantor fr:,.,a%. 'and ell claims to:injuries and/n;.±.-..7nageftiof!...rcil.l.y iiny perswi whi:h may be'onset!by the Cremee's exercise of the ri,ehls. . herein panted:pro..ided,the;Grantee shall not be reyonsibie to Grantor lit any injur.es and,',..r damages ta any person ne-ed by cots or c•ruasicns...if Gr ewur S. Abandonment.The riches hrrein....an.e 2:hall,•0-••11:.!.P•lit 01,P.11 lime ea Gran,,-, raaseF:o iv,:!“,14..v!..d.rr2Atly Icr a ;,eriod of:no;5'S.J.:17••:00,0e ypiii a.;;)whanh,...t.r.:!'n.s..w.c:nen!s!•all tem:Mato and a::"ill:,%a:a:in:lei*.•!sall rovet I:II Gran- or.pre.,•:ded that no abandur.rnent shall La-,hieniod in....v.,:uccur:od by reasun :,f Co al•lee's to:;:ae lo initially install its facili,:us en the Right-el-Way within any periud of horn horn the dam hereof. . .. . 7. &MCA:JIG...1 and Acsigni.The rIghts and onli,anons f:f the parties shall trove to the ber.cft,•_,I•af'fit binding upon their rcspecir.e successors and assigns • R-22 4 0 KJ— „ A0-00: FILED FOR RECORD AT RF.OLJEST OF: • -)1•43,3 7 9 5 7 3 . 2 3 4-1 4 1 FUGi" Ft.nI.'•'-'. . . so AT 235-1.22 RF,'I17. . i G:7.4 -11-..'.17: 'Z'''..::".• 1 7.3•. .* A••ITU: D .,-;,- ON::,S 1713 3,I•75 Pt......;Lr IICA7:ER nt. • • EX_LLEILin WA...a-El:C..0N 22009 "•:....:'.:".......... • ...._...._ ' ' I .------..— I I .,..... • . ' r • • • • • • • ( L Gated this I � day of P� -�_ • 1v1'3�R , 1986. 11 d GRANT I. ( . • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, • • California joint venture • By: CALIFORNIA ::TATE T ACHERS' RETIRE- • • MEN: SYSTEM,'Joint Vent�-rec • • i:^:tglas Sheldon ' I. Its_r. Invo:;to.nt nevi;9r r. - Real Estate . By: STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC Ei•IPLOYEiS' RETIREMENT, SYSTEM, Joint „., P venturer { • By 'F...J3-a. -. C Its R arri?^,. .0 .k <_r ,..` _\• -J `.By: \CROW-1^IEF:£9.-!!OSF'OP,I /I'1JESTOR: , \• • T`xas 'limited partnership \ \ • -- - -.. -� - • \STATE OF kA j)INCTC9 \ \. 9U?1TY OF .____) • �\ On this \, day f, .\ -before' --- - - - - - - •- -a Notary PBbi fin and (Or - - - - - - -••' n it• 7i1e"', • the State. of nashincter., duly cun- missiln,ed and sworn, personally appeared\, • ---�_.--•_- �-- tic me known LP the —_. --` of CALIFORNIA. STATE • TEACii F ' i;pTIRERgi;'c.'T�� . \.SYSTEM, a Joint Venturer of\. PACIFIC NORTHWEST GR'Uup A, 3 ``;aliforni, Joint Venture, who executed th,J of-c'ojrq in.;truno,•' and acknow\edged the same instrument t` he the\\free and O,tuntary • Wct and dead of said\joint• Ve_nt'tlre the 'yuaeJ and nUrpor;r•; ' t)erein mention.d, an,:' on oath stlted • is authv,-.izr.0 .to. execute th \ said instrument, • - \ •• \ • \.WITNESS MY.HAND ArD OF1ICiAL SEAL'i ERE2::j AFFIkED this day o - 19£+b. \`% \ Notary Public i i'end for \ sheSate of •\ \ \ Washington, res'disr a \ \, My Appointment I:::pit„ -- ._ . • • • STF�E OF FAS!It;GTO;7 ) `� \, \ ----� - • ` ) ss. \\ \ • CO UNTY OL'N'i! O F -) `.\ \ \ • On\this '\ day of 1983 \\a T7cta'. Public - --•_ before me, in and fa, the Sta:n n_ W.shi'ct ton duly ` comrisslopod end sworn, personal; appe_-„d. ' • g to me` known to b he � `\ - - -- of STATE OF `CALL:^ 7IA \PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' \ FrIr'.-.":'c:%T 1•(STL:4, a Joint Venturer of PACIFIC`\NORTHWEST GROUP A, a California`s Joint Venture, wh\. e„e cu,.ed\ the insti\imcnt, en\ac:tnowl-dc�o rthegfree C3 the sa;1c'\1 nstL•,�-_,t�to be• the\\free \ -2- f _ ,_ t • ''' . j . • • • • • PACIFIC NORTHWEST � '• QIG ! n - L • • r I• • 4 / Sta'.e of California ) ) SS .- County of San Francisf:' • ) - - • j • 4 • r . i. • . far. •-ncernber 1, 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in ac,d for the State of California, Douglas Sheldon, proved to me on the basis of sa'isfectory evidence)to oc the person whose name is subscribed to within the instrument, c,nd acknowledged that he exeeu' •d it. 1 . • .ITN ESS my nand and offielak sea;. . Et r ..L..,. _. ...�..r • : :. .•... D '' ,` t, .- • ;rc:. .. ,l:ge.:' • • nlcrvaa rv.. HAND AliD OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED. this • 1• daY\ of _ I,'13F. -`-- • . I .jc:,;•".:• i:F.n,_evr.IT c',A:r•?FR.-iN -u_1P Special (Rev. .S/ 6/ • I • 5`�_te of Calif:or_L:.a ) _ i • ) SS. Cou_:^•' o: Sao:a en.,1 ) Ca '� ,� ), `/< <i J i�,I-I '!,. _, ;.e:ora ter:, the u.dern gored, a A�ttr .,.bile to e-1.:. for said Stat,, y:-_...=.?:y ar;aa.ra 'i f� ‘ • I , ,'• • ;r-aor-aliy known to ❑c (or 2revei, to me on the bseis of sat rfactcr; e ic:ence) to be the --nif _ .`_ - - •{ "��• p� Stat. (•£ r.,,.:forr.ia, .,.nl:c E':p'_c.yeec' . I �` 1a. officer a' .a, ncy)V ;:�-e o= lic ••Lo , agency, . • iiti reoeni Sy.t' S.'L ac:!:�.'.7i,:Lzer,.. :., L:^ "..at 4^.:=:1 -_-:ro of Calif'-'"'i:, . . Cr IZcl'tic&:: out •vcs_oa) — ' ! .-.__.. ra :-e:ic- S,u51(c•1 ,.io;ees'�:-1•_,.lre:tent System r,, agency , or po:i:ic_.. a-.:.__-_:or) • . .-1 1:ESS cry izz_. .-_. o'_.:cial seal kii,11);.,,a:r.e,:,f: repo- ,,,q „e .� CIHA I. -cPt:YC, F•„4 �.. - '" — , • � I "s_u. s�..c.10 c:n.Tnr . I VRi,,,--•::Co-:pre.efimr'",n,..'pp•v • ' e.cc:s..:n6 . • F LED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: . • PUGCT PoWFR . REAL ESTATE DIVISION{ • PUGET PCY1E? BLDG. 'i/ 13 • -3- ELLL1ttE WI'HINGTOPI aBOO9 ATTts:DICK DOWNS _...� :: ', ; • •I PACIi •FCNORTHWEST GROUP A ORIGINAL. '�` R-2241 114.329570 t'. ERHI•.IT "A" • 1 :1 i Right of 'rfe: 210. i • i • Beginning at the north•a:•st corner of said northeast •:u•arter of the northeast quarter of Section 36; • • thence S 01'47'51" W along the west Line thereof, a distance. of 1,278.87 feet to a line 48 tc e.t northerly of th proposed • i # X; centerlipe of S. W. 43rd Street, said proposed centerline • begins at the intersection of the centerline of the. East i Valley Hi•::^.wsy with the south line of the northeast ;carter • . of the northwest quarter of Section 31, Tuw;;ship 23 North, • +.:rr.ne 5 East, W. M. 'and runs 'h, .ice westerly, in a straight :ine, to the intersection of •h. cc-'.terline of the West r Valley Highway with the south lira a` Government Lot 2 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 Erlt;.t, W. ;1. ; thence S 88°36'37' E along ssf'3 parallel lire a dib'..9-tee of ! 2,174.91 feet to a point N 25'05'34" E from a po_nt o•. the . sou' line of said Gov_:.:ment Lot- I wu:ieh is N 89",:3' ;4- n' 159.c9 feet from t.`.n tcutheast corner of said Go.'or,-menc Lot 1; • thence N 25°05'34" E a distance cf 93.20 feet to th line of the East 94.04 feet of said Government Lot 1: thence N O1'04'45" E along said ••" st line a distance of 758 . 38 • feet to the true p•,u1. of beyir:;.;.,7, thence N 83'3':'37" 1ti a dLstar,'e of s6.27 : ; • . thence N 01'23'23" E a distance of 32.50 °_c• . .0 thence N 88'36'37' W a d :�f 18 75 fet: ' • - thence N 01'23'23" ti. , d:.... .nce of 25.0; feet . r„iir,t • hereinafter referred r.e en Point 0,1 thence along - curve ' . .... . ht rl :it _ a r•:..:u, ,,f :5.00 filet, en arc ..3ist_.,.._ _e. :,; !.hrccvh a ceAtzal angle ; , of 89'41'22"• . QJ • thence S 01 '04'4 ., .. ._.st:.'.c' of 2.35 f .. t �.�• t:._ .. ... point t of beginning; F:}:t:E?: , 15 tn•: _ i:•... _ . ' Ri9ht-of Way. .N".•._ - - -- — -- - - - - - - - �. • - • L 7n� 11_ . t1 c ; ar ! ^ rr thence alone a curve tc; thy : hi re•,t o.r of which sears S 01°23''23" W, he.rr:a a red ll._ of ^ f'_'n' d' n.- dts_ace of 86.10 feet, through a centre'. angle of 89 4 , ; • thence S 01'04 ' _ 'n _! .nr the we:it rare_;. '. ... .. . .'ar'._e, a distance of 276.75 feet; tll+:r,c.. N 88'55'35' W a t9 st . .r e cf l'3.0!2 Zia,..t t.o the true pc.,n; of oacinn-nn; thence S 01'04'45" •r; a '3_stance of 18 _. . . , - thc,-,.e N E.8. I_ „ ... :.,ri:c. ci 112 64 ... , ' . • thence C 8' 3' 15' F. t: c:..,• ... .. 1 1 1 54 :_. nv true . point of t.•ca:;r,:ac. 1 i4ht of k:�.1 `c,. 3 i+: AND ALSO beclrntr:3 at t..c a:. ::-,•e,a ;'o-ht r thence N 68`3"s7' a distance of 719 89 f t ;. ;r, ., r. ,"1 ill ice: hereinafter referred to \,s Point. 'B" thence .S 01'23'23' N a distance of .5.01 Feet to .,, `' pc,int of beginning: thence con.tlrcu,rcg S 01'23'23' ;i a distance of 9.73 feet• f Q thence S 43`36'37" E. a distance of 79 42 feet to the . property _ire between ., _3di,,;s 2 d 3; ¢Cl �'t7 . thence S\03 :3'23" a.lonqdistancesaid line a distance _: 2E7.73 6 y • thence N 86'36' 37" k distance of 67.50 fue: ; ¢r'v�. thence Jr' G1`23'25' F. a distance of 56 OG feet; cc �pp ti._nce S 66'3t.'3 L a distance of 57.50 feet ; .!! '. thence N O1'23:23` E a distance of 207.5E feet: ti Le1-: • ,thence N 43'36'37' W a distance of 85.28 feet; v a thence N 01'23'23' E a dista-ce of 9 73 feet; Micca`; thence S 88'36'37" E a distance of 14 .14 feet to the true point of beginning. • ,c._ u ---._._ • • ' 4 • • • • • ORIGINAL • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A • R-2240 1'6123570 • • • So • EXHIBI': °F." continued • } Pightl of Way No. 4 It • ,I AND AJ,SO beginning at the aforerneritioned ?o:nt "B'•; thence N88'36'37" W .a distance of 557.47 feet; { thence S 01'23'23" W a dicta;,Ce of 15 00 fee: t.c the true point of beginnin 2; • thence continuing S 01'23'23" W a distance of 15.90 f,:et; t thr::•.ce S 02'25'29" E a dIsta::;:o. -._' 60. 13 fee:; the:ice S 01'23'23" W a distance of 270.50 feet; thence N 88°36'37" W a distance of 15.00 feet; thence N 01'23'23" E a .ai;,t::nce of 30.00 feet.; • thence S 88°36'37" E e: distance of 5.00 `•:-' ; thence N 01 °23'23' E a d:stanco of 240.14 f_ .. thence N 02'25'2v" '• 3 di:•t,^c•• of 60.49 _. Lr:�nce N 88'36'37" W a distance: of 24.4? f c•.; thence N 01'23'23" E a distance of 15.90 feet: • thence .S 88'36'27' E a distance of 34.50 to'the true point . • • of beginning. • • FILED FOR P.EC'iRD AT REQUEST OF: Cn PUGt•T POWER . RE?!. ESTATE ❑MS:ON • V PUGEi POWER BLDG. • SEU..EVUE. WAS9NGTON 9e009 • AiTN: DICK DO'.. • • • • • . • I . • • I • • • • I • • • rend r:.a::v`r Ve*J0^3 _ .. . • I • • • - • 142 g . EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM o S For and in consideration of One Dollar($1.00)and other valuable consideration,the receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged,PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A a Caffornla jnlnt venture(-Grantor herein), X • • grants, conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington L. corporation('Grantee'herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual easement under,across and over the following described real property(the'Property"herein)King County,Washington. • M Those portions of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East,W.M., In King County, Washington, and of Government Lot 1, SectIon 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,.In King S • County,Washington,lying South of Southwest 41at Street ee conveyed to the City • of Renton by Deed recorded under Auditors File No.8401050426 and lying North of d Southwest 43rd Street as conveyed to the City of Renton by deeds recorded under • Auditor's File No. 8010060645, 8011170558, 8105270723 and 8106010665, lying West of Lind Avenue as defined and described In deed recorded under Audltor. • File No,78080180517 and lying East of the West 90 feet of said Northeast quarter of 8 •• '• k tho Northeast quarter. ' • • ' Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the • Property(the'Right-of-Way'herein)described as follows: • •' 4 • GO O .See Attached Exhibit"A" G7 . O r p�j •• •1 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the right to construct,operate,maintain,repair,replace and enlarge an i {• underground electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under me Right-of-Way together _ _ _ ''..1 — —— l - _ — - —with-all necessary-or-convenient-appurtenances-therefore,-which mar Include but are rat limited to the • following: underground conduits, cables; communication lines; vaults, manholes, switches, and •;!�• • I I transformers; and semi-burled or ground mounted facilities. Following the initial construction of Its ' •I facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct suctt.addltional facilities as it may require. • :4 I 2 Access. Grantee shall have the right of access to the Right-of-Way over and across the Property to •r; • enable Grantee to exercise Its rights hereunder,provided,that Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any ; damage to the Property caused by the exercise of said right of access. i 3. Obatructione; Landscaping. Grantee may from time to time remove trees, bushes, or other 0 obstructions within the Right-of-Way and may level and grade the'Right-of-Way to the extent reasonably .f necessary to carry out the purposes set forth In paragraph 1 hereof,provldeo,that following any such •i • work,Grantee shall,to the extent reasonably practicable,restore the Right-of-Way to the.condition it was 1Immediately prior to such work Following me installation of Grantee's underground facilities,Grantor my 'f undertake any ordinary improvements to the landscaping of the Right-of-Way,provided that no trees or ., other plants shall be placed thereon,which would be unreasonably expensive or impractical for Grantee tolremove and restore. Grantee acknowledges that Grantor's landscaping as of the dale hereof Is not s unreasonably expensive or Impractical to restore. i 4.1 Grantor's Use of Right-cif-Way. Grantor reserves the right to use the Right-of-Way for any purpose I •• rt_i ir^.n.=!t:aant with the riahts herein Granted.provided:that Grantor shalt not rl,nctruct or maintain any .7 building or other structure on the Right-of-Way,which would interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted;that no digging, tunneling or other form of construction activity shall be done on the Property, which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on me Right-of-Way,or endanger the i latarai support to said facilities;and that no blasting shall be done within 15 feet of(he Right-of-Way. ., 5. Indemnity. By accepting and recording this easement. Grantee agrees to Indemnify and hold .1 harmless Grantor from arty and all claims for In)wles and/or damages suffered by any person,which may _i be mused by the Grantee's exercise of the rights herein granted; provided that Grantee shall not be •; Grarpoonrible to Grantor for any Injuries and/or damages to any person caused by acts or omissions of • • • C. Abandonment The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Right-or-Way for a period of five(5)successive years,in which event this easement shall terminate and 788.37 1-79 EXCISE RE i • King ca.ROCCISIO Dirtskal I. I. -1_ r — -- - t I • 1 , • 1 all rights hereunder shall revert to Grantor,provided that no abandonment shalt be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to Initially Install Its facilities on the Right-of-Way within any period of time from the date hereof. ' • • T11 Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of thu parties shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective euccessore and assigns. DATED this CI k day of DEC 1L44-131ij-• • t... ie 95 I GRANTOR • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A. a California Joint vi3nture • • BY: CAUFORNIA STATE TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM,an agency of the State of Calif. • I venture 1; !! By: ,i)i)„..,.....,,) ,..A. • 1 Efieen Y. Oa Its: nof„ty Chid Cxet„tive Ofnoer ' • BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' .P RETIREMENT SYSTEM,an agency of the Stare • of California,venturer • Br eue oYfr-a-- , .: By: I-,1. ),V4 . • m STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) m COUNW°F./W. 0 • ) On this /C*+t/ O/G�� • CQ'9 I day personally appeared before me !� . ------ p-.- -to me-known_to-bs-thhe_- IJ •& _ - -— -d-- -.a!'S'T17-5---- --— -- - ----- -;- -- --'--'- ----- t.0 the corporation that executed the fonrgoing Instrument.and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the 05 free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and 1•a -.on oath stated that(situ Is authorized to acacias the said instrument and that the oval efltxed is the .1 corporate seat of said corporation. /► • ;� Mists my herd and official seal this day of l itil•r,Ji i.,- ,193 S' •• , ! r y.v;• r�"�a Teats s Pr4A Nor r7,¢�G4f 6• m./cs . � � MoranAble-0 #a s Notary Public in end for tta State of Calf ornia, • Of o�ourrt 199s Residing at aa5zf UGtXis . /2, G� ,a, My • • commission acpt*s U-/9-Qi • I' STATE OF CALIFORNIA) • 1 )SS C i COUNTY OF ) I1 1 On this day personapy appeared before nu_ •Q.ac From"Z.' • • to Ms known to be the p1e.l aytSnred-otC,tsr of C A/�4 Rs • the corporation that®osctsed the foregoing instrtmtrert,and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the • free and vdudary act and deed of said corpondi n for the tress end purposes therein mentioned,and • on oath salad that [Cho is ai ortzad to atrac as the said Instnenera and that the seal affixed Is the i" • carparata seal of aald corporation � 3 1 Witness my herd and alttc}el semi this_i_i_day d bOotro hO r ,t 59S- • • 0.a - Kristine K Barber? P Nene i c 't i �,�r'he�' •f'' W 7)71•0977aa 7 ,, ji Nasty Public In and for the Stets d California. ' • 'tip f '4cvrowwrrr wc►K"an.r�.or�v.,nr Nailing at c. 2. 1,I. My commission open -,2_.7-910 to I • • • 1 ..... �.. 40 f _ d I • 1 . • • L.., .1 . j I 1 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM PACIPIC NORTHWEST GROUP A -- GRANTOR • • 1 PUGET BOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY -- GRANTEE • EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 36, Township. 23 North, Range 4 E.W.H. in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast quarter of the J Northeast quarter of Section 36; thence South 01°47'51" West along the West line thereof, a distance of 1,278.87 feet to a line 48 ' feet Northerly of the Proposed centerline of S.W. 43rd Street, said proposed centerline begins at the intersection of the centerline of . the East Valley Highway with the South line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North, • • Range 5 East, W.M. and runs thence Westerly, in a straight line, to 4 • . the intersection of the centerline of the West Valley Highway with .31 the South line of Government Lot 2 of Section 36, Township 23 4 North!, Range 4 East, W.H.; thence South 88°36'37" East along said _ ___, _ _-_ _ __ __parallel_line_ a_distance-of•_2,.174.-91-feet- to--a- point--North- - --- --.; -- - - i25°05�'34" East from a point on the South line of said Government 1 Lot 11 which is North 89°03'54" West 159.29 feet from the Southeast I corner of said Government Lot 1; thence North•25'05'34" East a distance of 98.29 feet to the West line of the East 94.04 feet of said Government Lot 1; thence North 01°04'45" East.along said West i line la distance of 758.38 feet; thence North 88036'37" West a � distance of 36.27 feet; thence North 01.23'23" East a distance of 32.501feet; thence North 88°36'37" West a distance of 18.75 feet; `. • I C'7 thence North 01°23'23" East a distance of 25.05 feet to a point of rl tangency also referred to as Point "A" in that certain Easement for • � • m Underground Electric System dated 12/01/86 and recorded 12/23/86 CDunderrKing County recording no. 8612231016; thence North 88.36'37" • CIO •West a distance of 1,277.36 feet; thence South 01.23'23". West a "' 1 O distance of 15.00 feat to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 01°23'23" West a distance of 15.90 feet; thence • ca South) 02°25'29" East a distance. of 60.13 feat; thence South •.� 01.231'23" West a distance of 300.50. feet; thence North 88.36'37" West A distance of 37.00 feet; thence North Ol'23'223" East a distance of 105.00 feet; thence South 88.36'37" East a distance of • 27.O0[feet; thence North 01.23'23" East a distance of 195.14 feet; thence North 02°25'29" West a distance of 60.49 feet; thence North ' • 88.36'37" West a distance of 24.48 feet; thence North 01°23'23" 1 • East la distance of 15.90 feet; thence South 88.36'37" East a i d• istance of 34.50 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT that 14 . portion lying within Right of Way No. 4 as described in said Easement for Underground Electric System recorded under King County recording no. 8612231016. ; i • h�@o i 10406�00 27700.2 . y0 • • • • .' I - ts-le ( ) • • • • • FILE ID: 396952K • ' F • • • • TO: PERKINS COIE 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4000 • S!EATTLE, WA 98101 • ATTN: BILL GREEN RIEF/ESC: NONE • • II • • • • ! - • • THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE • • • • • • • • • I • • !I , • SCHEDULE A2 Order No: 396952-5K DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 01°47'51" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF 1278.87 FEET TO A LINE 48 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET, SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF. • THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, • • RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND RUNS THENCE WESTERLY, IN A STRAIGHT LINE, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF . SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4.EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'37".EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE.A DISTANCE OF 145.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THEN CE_CONT_INUING_S_OUTH_88°36'.37EAS-T—ALONG-SAI-D--PARAL-L-EL--—--------- LINE 670.36 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 01°23'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 905.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH- 88°36'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 664.69 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°35'33" TO A LINE 90 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; . THENCE.SOUTH 01°47'51" WEST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 795.95 . FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°24'28" TO.THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER, ACROSS AND UPON A STRIP OF LAND 90 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 45 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON • EACH SIDE OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL A ABOVE. • • Page 3 • • • • • • I �,• r • • • • • First American Title Insurance Company . Regional Commercial Division • • 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800, . Seattle, WA 98121 • • Phone: (206) 728-0400 or (800) 826-7718 • TO: GRAHAM & DUNN. ATTORNEYS ORDER NO. 396952-5K 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 33RD FLOOR. REF: NONE SE4 TILE, WA 98101 . ATTN.• MAREN GALOR • • • Commitment For Title Insurance • I • ISSUED BY • • II First American Title Insurance Company ' Agreement to Issue Policy FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,herein called the Company,for a vtAluable consideration.hereby commits to issue',its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A. in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A. as owner or mortia';ee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A. upon payment of • premiums and cherges therefor. all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. 1 This Commitment shall he effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent indorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six(6)months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue. whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of tile Company. This Commitment shall not he valid or binding until countersi2ned by an authorized officer or agent. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to he slimed and sealed,to become valid when countersigned byian authorized officer or agent of the Company,all in accordance with its By-laws. This Commitment is effective as or the • date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." is • • First American Title Insurance Company • BY PRESIDENT ` ;k BYIVA x� ASSISTANT SECRETARY far• ;; ti�`r • • • • • Page 1 First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division • • 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206)728-0400 / Fax (206)448-6248 Toll Free 1-800-826-7718 Order No. 396952-5K REF: NONE COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: MIKE N. COOPER PHONE: (206) 728-7229 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: LANCE LEWIS PHONE: (206) 615-3257 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: ROB RANCOURT PHONE: (206) 728-7234 FAX NO.: (206) 448-6248 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: December 15, 1998 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Owners proposed insured: SOUND CONTAINER, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 3. Policy/policies to be issued: Amount Premium . Tax • Standard Owner's Coverage TO FOLLOW Easement Coverage $ 80.00. $ 6.88 L4. A fee simpl interest as to Parcel A and an easement interest as to Parcel B in the land described in this commitment is vested, at the Commitment date. in: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE 5. The land referred to in this commitment is described in Schedule A-2. • 6. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 36 Township 23N Range 4E NE Quarter NE Quarter. 7. Tax Account No(s).: 362304-9001-07 8. Property Address: 1000 SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 Page 2 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 Order No. 396952-5K e4R—ittrentents — -- • • The following requirements must be met: 1. Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s)creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. • Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term "mortgage",when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed,or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect,lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate,interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. • 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred,in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a)to coniply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered.by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions,exclusion from coverage,and the Conditions and • Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. • 'Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,and which arises out of the status of the title to the • estate, interest or the lien'of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. • II NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997,and pursuant to amendment of Washington State statutes relating to standardization of recorded.documents,the following format and content requirements must be • met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. FORMAT: Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. • Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 1/2" by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals;pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: • Title or titles of document.If assignment or reconveyance reference to Auditor's File Number of subject deed of trust. Names of grantor(s)and grantee(s)with reference to additional names on following page(s),if any. • Abbreviated legal description(lot, block,plat name or section,township,range and quarter section of quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s). Return address,which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top Margin. • • Page 4 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ' Order No. 396952-5K General Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same fare disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments,on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. • • E. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Water rights, claims or title to.water, 1 whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records; '(d) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. • ;Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or ;hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. • G. 'Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. IDefects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate, interest or mortgages thereon covered by this commitment. . I Page 5 • • • SCHEDULE B -•SECTION 2 CONT. ---- SPE-CTAL EXCEPTIONS Order No. 396952-5K 1. LIEN OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND.SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. LEVY CODE: 2110 2. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE. A COPY OF THE CURRENT AGREEMENT AND ALL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. ANY CONVEYANCE OR ENCUMBRANCE OF JOINT VENTURE PROPERTY MUST BE EXECUTED BY EACH JOINT VENTURER. 3. MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THE NAME(S) OF THE GENERAL/MANAGING PARTNER(S) OF THE PARTNERSHIP NAMED BELOW, PROVIDED SAID MATTERS REPRESENT PARTNERSHIP OBLIGATIONS. PARTNERSHIP: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE 4. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: . MARCH 6, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7903060824 1 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM • AFFECTS: THE SOUTH AND WEST 15 FEET 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: APRIL 5, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7904050914 IN FAVOR OF: . PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE • COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES, CONDUIT AND MANHOLE AFFECTS: THE WEST 20 FEET • (CONTINUED) • Page 6 • Order No. 396952-5K 6. EASEMENT, INCLUDING-TERMS AND PROVISIONS-CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8109020546 • IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL • CORPORATION FOR: WATER LINE AFFECTS: VARIOUS PORTIONS 7. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 27, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8105270722 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: SLOPES AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 8. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND/OR EASEMENTS; BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILY STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE 42 USC 3604(C): RECORDED': OCTOBER 11, 1985 iRECORDING NO.: 8510110737 • 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: .DECEMBER 23, 1986 RECORDING NO.: 8612231016 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM . AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 10. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: . RECORDED: MARCH 8, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 9603080833 (CONTINUED) Page 7 • • Order No. 396952-5K • IN FAVOR OF: . PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM AFFECTS: • REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION • 11. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. �.. 12.1 THE EASEMENT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL B HEREIN HAS NOT YET BEEN ESTABLISHED OF RECORD. IF THE FINAL DESCRIPTION TO BE INSURED DOES NOT CHANGE, THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WILL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE EAST 45 FEET.THEREOF. Special Notes: A: GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1998 WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID. AMOUNT: $507,650.87 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 362304-9001-07 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $14,295,400.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $23,947,400.00 • (INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY) B: THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MAY REQUIRE COMPLIANCE WITH RCW 58.17 (SUBDIVISIONS) AND WITH ANY COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION CODES OR ORDINANCES. THIS MATTER IS EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE ON THE FORTHCOMING POLICY(IES) PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1(A) OF THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE. C: ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE IS TO VEST IN SOUND CONTAINER, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION. EXAMINATION'OF THE RECORDS DISCLOSES NO MATTERS PENDING AGAINST SAID PARTY(IES). (CONTINUED) Page 8 • Order No. 396952-5K NOTES: . A. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this commitment pursuant to the • Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. I. B. 1 An abbreviated legal description is required by the County Auditor if the full legal description IS NOT contained on the first page of all documents to be 1 recorded. PS/ejh cc: 1 PERKINS COIE ' 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4000 SEATTLE, WA 98101 • ATTN: BILL GREEN cc: I CB RICHARD ELLIS 16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, SUITE 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 ATTN: MILT REIMERS • cc: LEND LEASE 600 UNIVERSITY STREET 12 UNION SQUARE, STE 2812 SEATTLE, WA 98101 • ATTN: BILL WILLIAMS cc: iR.E.E.F. 720 OLIVE WAY #614 • ;SEATTLE, WA 98101 • IATTN: GLEN SCOTT cc: TRAMMELL CROW 15601 6TH AVE. S. ;SEATTLE, WA 98108 ,ATTN: MIKE HUBBARD Page 9 • • f NOTICE 1 ORDER O. J /h i.5 Z /‹ • SUBDIVISION . - This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by.First American RCDG NO. OL & PG. , • Title Insurance Company and it is N121 a part of any title OTR/_ SEC� TWNSHP RNG commitment or policy of title insurance. N • � /k' This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in • locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, • •••:''.� roads,or easements affecting the property. No reliance should W E • be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the `property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. 8 • • • • • • .4, '".•101 A, "...NS 0, .....f.........-- ' " ,...'. ' .-- '�• , �-�e-{ . A.. R _ ink„ r n .,r•e.o- - 7. - ,r. r l s y.,• B.N.I. _•t.s, , s'n I I R r.[r •. T .( ,.'� .._ -.._. ...,>.. TRACT A ry.�' ron 1 ct(: -- �,..r1•. .n•si..,ra er l i. a Er • o1 • • • • o yl�• . '. • • • y 'f e • • • ' • - . :I. ��1. SW 41ST ST e••••s...r• t 4/ I / e i ,,_ ,� 0 / s 4 k . • . . . , r. , . . • . •. , i i • II I • • y 1 ..r..• I 0Z•P?r -I 1 F ' I • o • .� r ,.— r.... • ". ` : . ~ C-3 -- - r n o- -. _ -"r- -- 7 J .f, .. ,;�5 I • Form No. 1755 Commitment,Conditions and Stipulations • • • COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim1or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition'of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. • 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which'arises out of the status of the title to the estatelor interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this Commitment. gcoa Panted on Recycled Paper • • • • • N.• C. • • First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division. • 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (206) 728-0400 or (800) 826-7718 • • TO: GRAHAM & D UNN; ATTORNEYS • ORDER NO. 396952-5K 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 33RD FLOOR REF: NONE • SEA11LE, WA 98101 ATIN: MAREN GALOR • Commitment For Title Insurance ISSUED BY • • First American Title Insurance Company Agreement to Issue Policy • • FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,herein called the Company,for a valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to`in-Schdtiile:A,upon.payment of premiums and chzrges therefor,all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B to the Conditions and tStjeulatiions hereof.-' • This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the am unttiof the policy or policies• .:, committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance'of this Commi men or by subsequent indorsement. E ,. • This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liabilityland>obli ations • hereunder shall cease and terminate six(6)months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed,to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company,all in accordance with its By-laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." • • • ti!►4C��R;y,,, • • First American Title Insurance Company Ft' . c'�•..''..t BY PRESIDENT " -' ` ' a. 11( r-1—•!" • . • s/ -G ASSISTANT SECRETARY C•;,k, • _b� C�j \: *Niiraxvr r.•" • • It Page 1 • First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division 2 t0-1 4th Avenue,—Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206)728-0400 / Fax (206)448-6248 Toll Free 1-800-826-7718 Order No. 396952-5K. REF: NONE: COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: MIKE N. COOPER PHONE: (206) 728-7229 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: LANCE LEWIS PHONE: (206) 615-3257 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: ROB RANCOURT PHONE: (206) 728-7234 FAX NO.: (206) 448-6248 • SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: December 15, 1998 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Owners proposed insured: SOUND.CONTAINER, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 3. Policy/policies to be issued: Amount . Premium Tax i Standard Owner's Coverage TO FOLLOW Easement Coverage $ 80.00• $ 6.88 4. ,A fee simple interest as to Parcel A and an easement interest as to Parcel B in the land described in this commitment is vested, at the Commitment date in: • PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE 5. The land referred to in this commitment is described in Schedule A-2. 6. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 36 Township 23N Range 4E NE Quarter NE Quarter.. 7. Tax Account No(s)..: 362304-9001-07 • 8. Property Address: 1000 SOUTHWEST 41ST STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 Page 2 SCHEDULE A2 Order No. 396952-5K DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, .RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; THEN'ICE SOUTH 01°47'51" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF 1278.87.FEET TO A LINE 48 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET, SAID PROPOSED CENTERLINE BEGINS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, • RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., AND RUNS THENCE WESTERLY, IN A STRAIGHT LINE, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 145.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°36'37" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 670.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°23'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 905.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°36'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 664.69 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 • FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°i35'33" TO A.LINE 90 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 01°47'51" WEST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 795.95. FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°24' 8" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: S AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER, ACROSS AND UPON A STRIP OF LAND 90 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 45 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL A ABOVE. Page 3 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 • Order No. 396952-5K I . Ream7riamts The following requirements must be met: • 1. Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. i Proper instrument(s)creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Conditions and Stipulations The term "mortgage", when used herein,shall include deed of trust, trust deed,or other security instrument. •I . 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect,lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate,interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to.the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered.by this II Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions,exclusion from coverage,and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of tha proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a pan of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. I Ally claim of lois or damage,whether or not based on negligence,and which arises out of the status of the title to the 'estate, interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. fl • NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997,and pursuant to amendment of Washington State statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents,the following format and convent requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. it 1 FORMAT: • Margins to be 3"on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 1/2"by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals;pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: • Title or titles of document.If assignment or reconveyance reference to Auditor's File Number of subject deed of trust. • Names of grantor(s)and grantee(s)with reference to additional names on following page(s),if any. • Abbreviated legal description(lot, block,plat name or section,township,range and quarter section of quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s). Return address,which may appear in the upper left hand 3"top Margin. • • Page 4 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 Order No. 396952-5K • General Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public • records-but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records; (d) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or _ _ ,aboriginal rights, -including easements or-equitable-servitudes; - - - - - - - - - - - F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished; imposed by law and not shown by the public records. . G. •Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate, interest or mortgages thereon covered by this commitment. I . Page 5 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Order No. 396952-5K 1. LIEN OF THE REAL.ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. LEVY CODE: 2110 2. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE. A COPY OF THE CURRENT AGREEMENT AND ALL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. ANY CONVEYANCE OR ENCUMBRANCE OF JOINT VENTURE PROPERTY MUST BE EXECUTED BY EACH JOINT VENTURER. 3. MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY.A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THE NAME(S) OF THE GENERAL/MANAGING PARTNER(S) OF THE PARTNERSHIP NAMED BELOW, PROVIDED SAID MATTERS REPRESENT PARTNERSHIP OBLIGATIONS. . PARTNERSHIP: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE 4. . EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED - - THEREIN: . RECORDED: MARCH 6, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7903060824 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER AND.LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION • FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION.SYSTEM AFFECTS: . THE SOUTH AND WEST 15 FEET 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: APRIL 5, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7904050914 • iIN FAVOR OF: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: , UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES, CONDUIT AND MANHOLE AFFECTS: THE WEST 20 FEET (CONTINUED) • • Page 6 • Order No. 396952-5K 6. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: 0 • • RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8109020546 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR: WATER LINE AFFECTS: VARIOUS PORTIONS 7. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 27, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8105270722 0 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: SLOPES AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 8. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND/OR EASEMENTS; BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILY STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH • COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE 42 USC 3604(C): RECORDED: OCTOBER 11, 1985 RECORDING NO.: 8510110737 . 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: • RECORDED: DECEMBER 23, 1986 RECORDING NO.: 8612231016 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION • 10. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MARCH 8, 1996 • RECORDING NO.: 9603080833 (CONTINUED) . Page 7 • Order No. 396952-5K IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE • EXACT LOCATION 11. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS • OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. 12. THE EASEMENT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL B HEREIN HAS NOT YET BEEN ESTABLISHED OF RECORD. IF THE FINAL DESCRIPTION TO BE INSURED DOES NOT CHANGE, THE PROPERTY HEREIN • DESCRIBED WILL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE EAST 45 FEET THEREOF. • Special Notes: A: GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1998 WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID. AMOUNT: $507,650.87 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 362304-9001-07 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: _ . $14,295,400.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: . $23,947,400.00 (INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY) B: THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MAY REQUIRE COMPLIANCE • WITH RCW 58.1.7 (SUBDIVISIONS) AND WITH ANY COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION CODES OR ORDINANCES. THIS MATTER IS� EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE ON THE FORTHCOMING POLICY(IES) PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1(A) OF THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE. C: ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE IS TO VEST.IN SOUND CONTAINER, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION. EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS DISCLOSES NO MATTERS PENDING AGAINST SAID PARTY(IES). (CONTINUED) • Page 8 • • Order No. 396952-5K • NOTES: A. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule,of the Company. B. An abbreviated legal description is required by the County Auditor if the full legal description IS NOT contained on the first page of all documents to be recorded. . PS/ejh cc: PERKINS COIE 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4000 SEATTLE, WA 98101 ATTN: BILL GREEN . • cc: CB RICHARD ELLIS . 16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, SUITE 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 ATTN: MILT REIMERS • cc: LEND LEASE -----.- T.__.____600_sUNL.VERSITY_STREET_.__._____,_.._.rt_.�_... -_ --.-r— :- - r.___....:-. , .. :.•._....:..x = 2 UNION SQUARE, STE 2812 SEATTLE, WA 98101 • ATTN: BILL WILLIAMS cc: R.E.E.F. 720 OLIVE WAY #614 SEATTLE, WA 98101 • ATTN: GLEN scan- cc: TRAMMELL CROW . • 5601 6TH AVE. S. S • SEATTLE, WA 98108 ATTN: MIKE HUBBARD • • Page 9 • 1 . NOTICE , ORDER NO. 7/07 7-9 'l • SUBDIVISION _ . This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American • RCDG NO. OL & PG. Title Insurance Company and it is Ega a part of any title OTR/ SEC 36 TWNSHP 2 5 RNG < N Commitment or policy of title insurance. , This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in • ..I�' locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, ••. '' roads,or easements affecting the property. No reliance should w E • be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. • 1 8 • • .....;, ., qt.,. / I 4,j #e r /.....-.,.. ,..ff 10.1.!...4---...-.". „;............... ' • . .I Y :0: ,I 7 .i• 41. SW 41ST ST ®...er...e. • I. / y41 it jo J I f r _ i, 65) , 4 e r C 16, VI . s 1 H I i • e,y73n0 A, i Soz,P,` I] h 8 • Sf.fY [. ./S .... .f.1 N- `_-�ri ._ .. �- i)). , .. .�_._ _ te..,• ; ' • a { F r I • • • Form No. 1755 Commitment,Conditions and Stipulations • • COMMITMENT • Conditions and Stipulations . 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. • 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown • in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3_ Liability of the Company under_this Commitment shall-be-only=to-the=named-proposed-Ensured-and-such-parties--=—•— • included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a)to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate'or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this Commitment. • • • g,8 Primed on Recycled Paper