Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA02-121 ACORD CERTIFICJ='__ E OF LIABILITY INSURAI\ ���.T 'LAT SEP/7 04YYY) TM. PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUEDIIATIINFORMATION MICHAEL J.HALL&COMPANY ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGH ``tffPON THE CERTIFICATE 19578 10TH AVENUE N.E. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOE {�O f�J I[ END OR POULSBO WA 98370 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORD ISYE�f1�IV�BELOW. DtiulYS " Agency Lic#:91-1461089 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A: HARTFORD CASUALTY INS.CO. CI TO IREW '4_ INSURER B: THE HARTFORD GRAY&OSBORNE,INC. INSURER C: ST.PAUL INSURANCE CO. 701 DEXTER AVENUE N.,SUITE 200 — -p 1 0 2004 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98109 INSURER D: INSURER E: RPf ftmr= COVERAGES CITY CLERK'S OFFICE THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADD'L TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR INSRD DATE(MMIDDIYY) DATE(MMIDDIYY) GENERAL LIABILITY 52SBADU7303 SEP 10 04 SEP 10 05 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED $ 300,000 .PREMISES(Ea.occurence) JCLAIMS MADEI1 OCCUR MED.EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 A PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:1 PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. $ 2,000,000 7 POLICY I I PROJECT I I LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 52UECJS3276 SEP 10 04 SEP 10 05 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT X ANY AUTO (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ 0 B X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ 0 X NON-OWNED AUTOS - (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ 0 (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ 0 ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ 0 AUTO ONLY: AGG $ 0 EXCESS I UMBRELLA LIABILITY 52SBADU7303 SEP 10 04 SEP 10 05 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 3,000,000 X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ 3,000,000 A o $ 0 DEDUCTIBLE 0 $ 0 RETENTION$ 0 $ 0 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 52SBADU7303 SEP 10 04 SEP 10 05 WC STATU- OTHER EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY WIRY I IMITS A ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT — _,$_ _ — 1,000,000 , 1 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 OTHER: QP03801111 SEP 10 03 SEP 20 04 $1,000,000 EACH CLAIM C PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY $1,000,000 AGGREGATE W/POLLUTION LIAIBLITY CLAIMS MADE POLICY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS SEE SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE INFORMATION CERTIFICATE HOLDER — CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 45 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON,WA 98055 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -- Z 79Z-1/e Attention: ALLEN QUYNN AS EY L. HURD ACORD 25(2001/08) Certificate# 26872 ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 POLICY NUMBER: QP03801111 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED-OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (Form B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization; CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 (If no entry appears above. information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of"your work' for that insured by or for you CG 20 10 11 85 Copyright. Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1984 Certificate# 26872 I • DATE SUPPLEMENT TO ( ZTIFICATE OF LIABILIT"';NS #26872 SEP704 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS RE:SWP-27-2959 CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED ON THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY AND UMBRELLA LIABILITY POLICIES AS RESPECTS LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF ACTIVITIES BY,OR ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED INSURED. A WAIVER OF SUBROGATION APPLIES TO THE GENERAL LIABILITY,AUTO LIABILITY,AND UMBRELLA LIABILITY POLICIES IN FAVOR OF THE ADDITIONAL INSURED. THIS INSURANCE IS PRIMARY INSURANCE AND ANY OTHER INSURANCE MAINTAINED BY THE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS SHALL BE EXCESS ONLY AND NON CONTRIBUTING WITH THIS INSURANCE. CG0043 AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT IS PROVIDED. Certificate# 26872 07/12/2002O9_13 FAX 206 283 6 GRAY.OSBORNE HALL & CO ral002 City of Renton .!�.J``-,/ . Human Resources & Risk Management Department Insurance Information Form FOR; GRAY & OSBORNE, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: SWP-27-2959 STAFF CONTACT: Allen Quynn Certificate of Insurance indicates the coverages/limits specified in © Yes ❑ No contract? Are the following coverages and/or conditions in effect? 0 Y• es ❑ No The Commercial General Liability policy form is an ISO 1993 ❑X Yes ❑ No Occurrence Form or Equivalent? (If no,attach a copy of the policy with required coverages clearly identified) CG 0043 Amendatory Endorsement provided?` El Yes El No General Aggregate provided on a"per project basis(CG2503)?* ❑ Yes ❑ No Additional Insured wording provided?" ❑X Yes ❑ No Coverage on a primary basis and non-contributing basis?* ❑X Yes D No Waiver of Subrogation Clause applies?* E. Yes ❑ No Severability of Interest Clause(Cross Liability)applies? ❑X Y• es El No Notice of Cancellation/Non-Renewal amended to 45 days?* Q Y• es ❑ No 'To be shown on certificate of insurance* AM BEST'S RATING FOR CARRIER GL A±XV Auto A+XV Umb A+XV Professional AXV This Questionnaire is issued es a matter of information. This questionnaire is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies indicated on the attached CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. The CITY OF 1Z1 NTON, at its option, shall obtain copies of the policies and/or specific declaration pages FROM awarded bidder prior to execution of contract. Michael J . Hall & Company Ashley L. Hurd, CIC Agency/Broker Completed By(Type or Print Name) .loth Avenue Po / Pouislsbo, WA 98370 C�Cd Address Completed By()signature) Ashley L. Hurd, CIC • ( 360 ) 598-3700 Name of person to contact Telephone Number NOTE:: THIS QUESTIONNAIRE MUST BE COMPLETED FOR EACH LINE OF COVERAGE AND ATTACHED TO CERTIFICATE()F INSURANCE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 6, 2003 TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Holly SUBJECT: Land Use File Close-Out Please complete the following information to facilitate project close-out and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. roioioioioioror0/4776 oi®ioro/0/070/0/0/0foroioi070/0707AVYA®i®i®ioimi®i®i®i0rm 7747/0fsioioimr®i®isi13VAMM®i®ioi®i®i®i®i®i®iofrimioioiaroi®ioi®ioioioroioioioioi®ioio� ro grog Project Name: Urban Design Code Amendment 0 agog LUA(File) Number: LUA-02-121, ECF ;° 40 gag Cross References: AKA's: N/A 0 Project Manager: Gil Cerise Acceptance Date: October 25, 2002 0 g p 0 Applicant:.City of Renton Owner: 0 o oContact: Gil Cerise PID#: E g ERC Approval/Denial (circle one) & Date: November 12, 2002 a o ERC Appeal Date: December 5, 2002 11 0 Public Hearing Date: N/A Appeal Period Ends: N/A 0 c Date Appealed to HE & By Whom: N/A o $ HE Decision & Date: N/A o g o Date Appealed to Council & By Whom: N/A 0 0 0 Council Decision & Date: N/A Mylar Recording #: 0 $ Project Description: CODE AMENDMENTS REQUIRING DESIGN REVIEW FOR DUPLEXES THROUGH $ gaga FOUR PLEXES, CURRENTLY THESE STRUCTURES ARE EXEMPT FROM THE URBAN DESIGN CODE gaga gaga REQUIREMENTS. 0 0 o Location: 0 g, 0 0 Comments: 0 o 0 g g PAOroro%oro4orOro/orororororororOrOrorRrorormrorAro%WA7/.7rmror®ror.®r®r®r.0rorm1®rsr®ro/®7®4or0r®rllr®r®/orororormro40r®r®4or0r®V®rmroMor®/orororo7O%Oror®r/lrorororo/or®ro% Setup - mends ORD 4971 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4991 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO APPLY URBAN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES TO MULTI- FAMILY PROJECTS OF TWO TO FOUR UNITS, AND TO PROPERTIES REZONED FROM COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO) TO CENTER DOWNTOWN (CD) AND RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY URBAN (RM- U) AS A RESULT OF THE SOUTH RENTON NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-3-100.B.4 of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts,"of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Exemptions: a., Interior Remodels: Interior remodels of existing buildings or structures provided the alterations do not modify the building façade. SECTION II. Section 4-3-100.B.5 of Chapter 3, "Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts,"of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to update the Urban Center Design Overlay District Map, as shown in Attachment "A." SECTION III. Section 4-3-100.C.3 of Chapter 3, `Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts,"of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4 9 91 3. Modification of Minimum Standards: The Development Services Director shall have the authority to modify the minimum standards of this Section subject to the provisions of RMC 4-9- 250D provided a development as a whole meets the intent of the regulations in subsections D,E, F and G of this Section. 1 xception: Modifications to the requirements in subsections RMC 4-3-100.D.1.a(i) and D.1.a(ii) are limited to the following circumstances: a. When the building is oriented to an interior courtyard, and the courtyard has a prominent entry and walkway connecting directly to the public sidewalk; or b. When a building includes an architectural feature that connects the building entry to the public sidewalk; or c. In complexes with several buildings, when the building is oriented to an internal integrated walkway system with prominent connections to the public sidewalk(s). SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of December , 2002. 13&1141.-ce:4. attr, Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of December , 2002. /. Jesse Tanner, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4991 Approved . to form: COUawdmey Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 12/13/2002 ORD.1015:11/08/02:ma 3 ri ---a---------------- - „..._4"---... J' CD .....s ED ME , 1: ..., 1 • __ WU um > It .161 mall El Cl. ANA,tS191,, ,i„,,,,,,,.„..„,,,, , „Iato iLitin lii Evi- , \ 1::,•f- r / 1 ei.,?,,!.f*,,„ ,,.„,,, :mospols, .... , • nA7An:,,RP.V.A7',&%•,,,W A- IIM ti Rib it.',4011WOVal i fi'.,..ielk.itigg Eabtilli,W141,s diniteg,.. „ 'A III IiIirdnIfillrilligiri Iii,.V11 iC '.''wit,RPM rifi; 1,57! ato,/,-.42-vit,:mirm;4565'..:4 I I I . ....< . q ri.Nrii ,g: , -,,i,,,,,,, : .444, 4-Ltmicw-A.t..,, 0 1MM tfiffilgriinivxmffilom ft.E La.:4:‘'Y:V!0*ZON*7172..tei.:g MI . -,9',1,Y-fA' latg .......'''•','-,F'•"'a wkn, :..kri,.-t'.6,.'"•• •. -.' iiiihMatidqrt Ell l'.20r•tilt''',0-1',`q. 111J' E Fen!r4111.4-4-Yoil,704cs!'",:,Vej-PTiV 4•mi ,-,,,,,,',-:,,-,t,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,..„4 ,ç>L ,,,,.....„:„.,...„.„,-;,g.',..,„,,.,,-,,,,,,,,A,„.„-„,,,,,,,„..T„-„,•F:4 oit:e4.,,,, ::,t7evy,,,-3.4i:4,Nig 47411111'4,PPIONIP?Im14,40: -,-;aiiiiiiiiiii Ilk 4';:ria,4 g ft:2Prgn..,,'„,,,,V;04',4-4,311'Mil / 1 , ills-11ms, ri I Igo:6,st--7---ii, ;;,,ir.,. ..', ,-11t.:,,,,,,,,..,. Er-HIR Will M fl IVAV/Vi 411 OhiPi-rl'AR''Ugilakirlito'4[UDEN ad•vc4sgauror - '3 imeraiNwie ow;liner Ag 4.No ,.,- ...-4 .4-4,k iic..-smIN Lk,dgnigillW*1111/111M -. ;- ,n„''',5m.7..4.3, z tz 7 7'4,4,i. Z -1==.• '741'''OBIGUNIV qiinf -'6'1---L'''rq,BM SIS7',1:40".0 is,:i4,fillii-r7.— ...„4„..,.... '-, ,;.;;;;,,,,„-..„0,.- ....§,,,,..,,,...,,,,dot,::-,-,.. 12 rkftV,14t.41,...k...,., ,,...........,,,,,,, ,,......,........_ .., „ .,...,,..0 . Z 0 MillinginnilltieWatle liggig or lis otalvkit.-jeitr1411t fe,1,,..egiimr ,...ji,;',73Meimisaliaucloaoteniting/W,C1-1)tt 0"It 1'0',..v 0'7...11,,L.q‘..4„I i1.111.11;111, ,,q.irgipi,Y /zt Jim' ko.„,, ,,4-...1,7( .,,, • .1,,,,,,4 ..-.,,, .,:?n,,, ,L ....,-,!-,01,' \f--;7:161agtigelptinplopt,ikv,,-,0,,,A4,0-,0 0,'--T,;ouilliliA `-yvii--xgillik •.,',.iplifiv.„44, .....-- //111 1 I 1-, - ,,-",..,",,,-,,,, ..it,,,, ,.:-....::,.- -.„,,.......344143 t5ij t itgfs`-;*r1.4=1 -vr ji. in, '..,.:,P,•%.,-"& UZ.in,,,,,:A,Wff.04,''''''' '','4-.P"A",;,,'''',,,,Ur L'it,V,1;,,.i:i ., ,.•4 7,,,Lvi;. .a.TAY.:.aPP:f..i 4::C:Nde24, * Aga allillPia \liglifilL,4,:fAWi.4 ,::?, wilipigi t.,:i.',it 1*ek-zir *41--7.7 — WWI iIIIIII I/i -7:1FRoawdot NVelitiligitiNi,-Ailmilm,.%3 iir,', ,KPItev ‘. • , Avg!,.5.tt,....,,o,o,..,,Q,,ilp,,,•-,,...gt•oT,,..,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..!,..,,,.q.31*.:,,,,i" A., ion minivan [ , • h,..,.-emig4,t77,, • imigglitree..,.,Nlifintiet....„- i0n muff,e- i E 1 ...___/ :,,,!A,. • Illb -----t 1-- E.74fingiii ,:7414,44.10,,,,.3....:,..,:t,...--..,-,:t:,:e.'„,,,.-7, , Nil 1 J 1111114i.. 110440.,T,..,,tko,,°,,kts isi ,,A ,.,...4,,,- w Ei1111110 L i 1,1 i I Rc Oft 1SEII.le s -,1c.,,..„,,,,„„,,,,,,,,,,$.*,'" Vi74.',W;:,.. t'XeIMII NE1111111 111 -1 ii 11111 11.. pry 4 11,, ,, ,, ..,igl In - Ave S— ‘6,2 -,4/ WI II 11111111!4r11 I 7t,en t on a‘,e 5 p --,,i Imp. —1111imifilis• A • 1.• hi. ' IIIII 1T17111-11TIT1 CI 4. .,., . • 4,-... 740 .._. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION P NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ; , ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ DETERMINATION Barbara Alther,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW . COMMITTEE , SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 ' Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following. a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of project under .the authority; of •the general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of _Renton Municipal Code. - publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily t. newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Joumal has been approved as a Urban Design District Overlay legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. •; Code Amendments The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and LUA-02-121,ECF not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below Proposed amendments to section I stated period. The annexed notice,a 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code •• dealing with applicability of the Urban Design Dist Overlay Urban Center Design Guidelines ' j would remove SEPA exempt .•- as published on: 11/18/02 projects from the'exemption section of this code section. Location: i The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$73.50,charged to Applicable to multi family projects Acct.No.8051067. , within the' Center Downtown I Comprehensive Plan designation. Appeals of the environmental The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. ' determination must be filed in writing ' .on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, Legal Number 848581 :. 2002.Appeals must be filed in writing i f.d together with -the required i hl.4. 1/1/4_ $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner, Legal Clerk, South County Journal t City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the! �� `A , Examiner are governed by City of 4-8- Subscribed and sworn before me on this dayof !�/t//1 v,-d 2002 110. Additionaln Municipal Codea Section ding � 110. information regarding ` ` the appeal process may be obtained `0%►1111 i/1/o from the Renton City Clerk's Office, `\O�� p L L. C q S//i,', Notary Pu is of the State of Washington ` (425)-430-6510. Published in the South County ` C)*' �gg10fY ESA;;••p %��' O� residing in Renton Journal November 18,2002.848581 co�� ea�lAgy 9w�. VCR Op�� King Countyv-r ,Washington —e— .7. r Op FMbAIM�G — — -- 'i r. p * a*�.-.`. 'gym L.it �1 r= i ...d rma . ENV INTERESTED PERSONS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LUBAN DESIGN DISTRICT A-02.1ES ECF OVERLAY CODE DE AMENDMENTS Municipal CodeAND with LOCATION: n of tlonhe Urban Center Desi section q�_100 of SE PA exempt g with Proposed rban Ce e • projects of 2_gProfects from the Guidelines pulp dwelling m which section of this co gs Guidelines Renton thisr code amendment to unitscomplywith are currently exemptde swaUn. 7hie nued remove Plan. The mapenvcorrects a mapping errorthe rri leftm design the Urban means that properties mendl amendment would eI#en over from the hedellna standards Center floc, i enton I Neighborhood Plan.Zoned as CO that xtewerndr the Urban CD Center Desiig Rn sn iad Nei hbo ereor tbor a. Theproposed ode set amendmenttoincludes s U Via �dofaoe nv mood family that re alsothe S °over n the Center Downtown Comprehensive i Modification desig a correction is a scrivener'- THTHATY OF Plan designationPPlicable to multi_ T THEI PROPOSED ENVIRONMENT.F RENTD ACTION DNMENTALES NOT REVIEW COMMITTEE fERC MIANT A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMP ETERMINED ' ACT ON THE Appeals of the environmental c H ae^2t en APnmenmudt bermination must be Dec 2 Examiner,002. d In with: Examiner areCity of Renton, In writing together yyher withwriting on or before 5; Exaregminer iceing the a ppeal y ao bof e Municipal Code Way,Rentonthe quired$75 WA 98055,0 sl ifoma fee 14414.. obtained from the Renton Section Clerks OffAACee.diticnaAppeals atton City I ® Mil _- (g25}g30-6510. •11�11� B / �€f�a=P 3� � -g. 1 i:n)ii I'u . 4 1 �in-G:,Ii, Tray 1 t „*.7--terifar daL -t 1.4..;:.;.;i R *, �\ ..-t. il illi:aim .r:� i Jr.; t E-7z., V El FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE EASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT DO NOT REMOVE THIS ES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. Please Include NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER the project NUMBER when caning AUTHORIZATION 9 for proper file Identification. - -_____ CERTIFICATION I, ,,( Cer , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • pdsc ' ed property on vein (SI 2 0 .Z Signed: ATTEST: Subscribed an orn before me,a Notary Public,in and fort tote of Washi�gtidgg ^ ,on the /8`�` day of .O,P! �6��_. MARILYN K�4IM-° 6�I= MAN -1 �pp gjy�y�/� ar-pop "^ ��° `t° P�9���� Mv�l� os �� �ifi �IRI=s: s-2o-03 STi�TE psFWl� GT��! 1COMMS10�9SHIN�YI�It��S JUIN4.E29,2003 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE,BY MAILING On the 15 day of MO U • , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States asealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING ) /J I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A.w-ec ( J)R,.0 c.,) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dat • � MARILYN KA' CHEFF Notary Public and for the State of Was ngton NOTARYPUBLIC Notary(Print) MIA H STATE OFFWASHINGTON My appointment exq COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: j Irto4r1 Pe5isIA(c Project Number: C.bU1 07 - I zJ ELF NOTARY.DOC AGENCY(DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Washington Dept. of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section Habitat Program Attn. SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard 39015— 172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Mill Creek,WA 98012 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman Attn: Ramin Pazooki 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 PO Box 330310 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Real Estate Services PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division Seattle Public Utilities Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Suite 4900, Key Tower Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 700 Fifth Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager City of Tukwila Metro Transit PO Box 90868 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street MS: XRD-01W Tukwila,WA 98188 KSC-TR-0431 ' Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the following agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. Also note, do not mail David Dietzman any of the notices he gets his from the web. Only send him the ERC Determination paperwork. Last printed 10/22/02 3:57 PM December 9,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 473 Ordinance#4989 An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2003 for Finance: 2003 Property Tax both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY Levy NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4990 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Planning:Employment Area Standards,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code to allow a Valley,Freestanding Sign freestanding sign height of 115 feet, for big-box retail developments of 350,000 Code Amendment square feet in building area or more,in the Employment Area Valley. MOVED 4,u1! o s- 1 Zo BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4991 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Planning:Urban Center Overlay Districts,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code to apply Design Overlay Regulations, Urban Center Design Guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four units, Application to Small Multi- and to properties rezoned from Commercial Office(CO)to Center Downtown Family Projects (CD)and Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM-U)as a result of the South Li iq D2- �2 Renton Neighborhood Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4992 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-3-050 of Chapter 3,Environmental Utility:Aquifer Protection Regulations and Special Districts; Section 4-4-060 of Chapter 4,Property Code Amendments Development Standards; Section 4-8-120 of Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; LEA 02,Dl l and Section 4-9-015 of Chapter 9,Procedures and Review Criteria; of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code by amending aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Stating that she attended the Maplewood Glen neighborhood sign dedication, Development Services: Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported a problem concerning the blockage Temporary Signs Obscuring of the new neighborhood sign by temporary real estate signs. MOVED BY Established Neighborhood KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE Signs ISSUE OF TEMPORARY SIGNS NEAR ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD SIGNS TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Fagan— Councilman Clawson noted the receipt of a letter from Rick Fagan,Director of Temporary Office Space Fagan Recovery Solutions,23220 Maple Valley Hwy., Suite 204,Maple Donation Valley, 98038,concerning the recent closing of the Cedar Hills Substance Abuse Treatment Center due to King County's budgetary constraints. Mr. Fagan reported that while he is negotiating with King County to acquire the facility,temporary office space is needed; and he requested that the City donate temporary office space. Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry,Mayor Tanner reported that Community Services Administrator Jim Shepherd will respond to Mr.Fagan's letter informing him of the City's inability to provide the office space;however, he commended Mr.Fagan on his efforts to continue the treatment center. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler suggested that the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department may be able to assist Mr. Fagan in obtaining an office space donation. December 2,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 457 • Facility owners would be required to take appropriate actions if a contaminant is found in a monitoring well located on the facility property. In conclusion,Ms.Boatsman stated that adoption of the proposed amendments would improve aquifer protection and facilitate Code implementation. In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding determining the source of a contaminant,Ms.Boatsman explained that there is an existing Code provision that would exempt the business owner from responsibility if the owner can demonstrate that a contaminant found in their monitoring well does not originate on their property. Responding to Councilman Parker's question, Ms.Boatsman confirmed that not many businesses are located in the proposed Zone 1 Modified. Audience comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 461 for related Planning&Development Committee report.) Planning: Urban Center This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Design Overlay Regulations, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Application to Small Multi- to consider the Urban Center Design Guideline Code amendments. Family Projects Gil Cerise, Senior Planner, stated that the proposed City Code amendments will apply existing design guidelines to two-to four-unit multi-family projects; OA 4 t 2- (Z I apply design guidelines to the overlay district for properties formerly zoned Commercial Office(CO),now zoned Center Downtown(CD) and Residential Multi-Family-Urban(RM-U); and correct a scrivener's error in the Urban Center Design Guideline section in City Code. In regards to the applicability of the guidelines to small-scale multi-family projects,Mr. Cerise explained that existing Code exempts all SEPA-exempt (State Environmental Policy Act)projects from the Urban Center Design Guidelines. He noted that SEPA exempts all multi-family projects of four or fewer dwelling units; and the South Renton Neighborhood Plan,particularly with the creation of the Residential Multi-Family-Traditional (RM-T) zone, forecasted small-scale development. Indicating that the existing situation allows poor quality small-scale multi-family developments to mix with higher quality, large-scale multi-family development,Mr. Cerise explained that staff recommends removing the Code Section that exempts SEPA-exempt projects from the design guidelines. In regards to extending the Urban Center Design Guidelines to the entire CD zone,Mr. Cerise stated that the South Renton Neighborhood Plan rezoned CO properties to the CD and RM-U zones. Previously, design guidelines were not applicable because there were no residential units allowed in the CO zone. Pointing out that since it is now possible to have residential multi-family dwelling units in that area,Mr. Cerise stated that staff recommends correcting the oversight to incorporate the design guidelines in the newly rezoned CD and RM-U properties located north of S. Grady Way. He concluded by stating that staff recommends Council adopt the proposed amendments. Audience comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 461 for related Planning&Development Committee report.) December 2,2002 Renton City Council Minutes _ Page 459 In response to Mayor Tanner's questions,Ms.Horton confirmed that the house on Wells Ave. S. will be sold once the artifacts are dispositioned; that RHS receives$1,000 per month leasehold rent,with the lease expiring in 2007; and that the property currently under discussion with First Savings Bank will revert to RHS. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 25, 2002. Council concur. November 25,2002 CAG: 02-194, Gene Coulon City Clerk reported bid opening on 11/25/2002 for CAG-02-194, Gene Coulon Park Nisqually Earthquake Memorial Beach Park Nisqually Earthquake Rehabilitation; five bids; Rehab,Precision Earthworks engineer's estimate$200,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Precision Earthworks,Inc.,in the amount of $171,267.52. Council concur. CAG: 02-193, Veterans City Clerk reported bid opening on 11/25/2002 for CAG-02-193,Veterans Memorial Park Development, Memorial Park Development; eleven bids; engineer's estimate$275,000 to Athletic Fields Inc $300,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to second low bidder,Athletic Fields,Inc., in the amount of$195,731.20. Refer to Finance Committee for discussion regarding the irregularity with the low bid. CAG: 01-152;Park Lighting Community Services Department submitted CAG-01-152,Park Lighting Renovation,Duchess Const Renovation; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$21,694.12, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$12,159.79 to Duchess Construction,Inc., contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Plat: Geneva Court,Talbot Rd Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions, of the S (FP-02-114) Geneva Court Final Plat; 24 single-family lots on 3.63 acres located at 5310 Talbot Rd. S. (FP-02-114). Council concur. (See page 461 for resolution.) Transportation: Freight Action Transportation Systems Division requested authorization to enter into a Strategy(FAST)MOU Memorandum of Understanding with Freight Action Strategy(FAST),Phase II, a partnership with public and private agencies whose focus is to improve freight mobility in the Puget Sound Region. Council concur. (See page 461 for resolution.) Added Item 6.2. Human Resources and Risk Management Department requested approval of the Human Resources: Local 2170 Local 2170,Washington State Council of County and City Employees AFSCME Labor Contract American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFL-CIO) labor agreement,for 2003-2005. Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED INCLUDING ADDED ITEM 6.g. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Toni Nelson presented a report recommending adoption of Committee of the Whole the 2003 property tax levy,which will increase by one percent,plus new Finance: 2003 Property Tax construction, and any annexations as defined by the King County Assessor. Levy The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 461 for ordinance.) December 2,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 461 $3,112,154.54, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry regarding the completion date, Chief Administrative Officer estimated that Fire Station#12 will be constructed by the end of 2003 or early 2004. *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending concurrence Utility: Aquifer Protection in the recommendation of staff that the Council adopt the proposed Code Amendments amendments to the City's aquifer protection regulations. The Committee (,t ii -p2 - (DTI further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for ordinance.) Planning&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee report regarding the proposed Urban Center Design Overlay Regulation Code Planning:Urban Center amendments. The Committee recommended that the Code amendments be Design Overlay Regulations, approved and the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. Application to Small Multi- MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL Family Projects CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for U/110i'(Z I ordinance.) Planning: Employment Area Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Valley,Freestanding Sign report regarding the proposed large freestanding Sign Code amendments in the Code Amendment Employment Area Valley. The Committee reviewed the proposed amendments Z and associated issue papers and exhibits on November 7, 2002. There was a LU,A " public hearing held on November 18, 2002, and public hearing comments were closed on December 2, 2002, after the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) process was completed. The Committee recommended that the Code amendments be approved and that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 462 for ordinance.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3604 A resolution was read approving the Geneva Court Final Plat consisting of Plat: Geneva Court,Talbot Rd approximately 3.63 acres located in the vicinity of 5310 Talbot Rd. S. (FP-02- S (FP-02-114) 114). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3605 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Freight Action agreement with the Freight Action Strategy(FAST)Partnership,Phase II, Strategy(FAST)MOU entitled"Memorandum of Understanding Among the Principal Parties of the FAST Corridor." MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 12/09/2002 for second and final reading: Finance: 2003 Property Tax An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2003 for Levy both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY December 2,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 462 PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. Planning: Employment Area An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Valley,Freestanding Sign Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code to allow a Code Amendment freestanding sign height of 115 feet, for big-box retail developments of 350,000 ?Aidi ' (2V square feet in building area or more, in the Employment Area Valley. MOVED (J BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. [ ---, Planning:Urban Center An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Design Overlay Regulations, Overlay Districts, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code to apply Application to Small Multi- Urban Center Design Guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four units, Family Projects and to properties rezoned from Commercial Office (CO)to Center Downtown " (CD) and Residential Multi-Family Urban(RM-U) as a result of the South LA -02 -( al Renton Neighborhood Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. CUtility: Aquifer Protection An ordinance was read amending Section 4-3-050 of Chapter 3,Environmental Code Amendments Regulations and Special Districts; Section 4-4-060 of Chapter 4,Property Development Standards; Section 4-8-120 of Chapter 8,Permits and Decisions; WA-01 - 09 and Section 4-9-015 of Chapter 9,Procedures and Review Criteria; of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code by amending aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/09/2002. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4988 An ordinance was read providing for the 2002 year-end Budget adjustments in Finance: 2002 Year-End the amount of$8,263,407. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY Budget Adjustments CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Nelson opened nominations for 2003 Council President. Council: 2003 Council MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ELECT President Election(Keolker- COUNCILWOMAN KEOLKER-WHEELER AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT Wheeler) FOR 2003. CARRIED. Council: 2003 Council Council President Nelson opened nominations for 2003 Council President Pro President Pro Tern(Persson) Tern. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ELECT COUNCILMAN PERSSON AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM FOR 2003. CARRIED. Community Services: Library MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER Staffing,Non-Resident THE FOLLOWING TOPICS TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES Recreation Fees,Human COMMITTEE: 2003 LIBRARY STAFFING, 20%NON-RESIDENT Services Funding RECREATION FEES INCREASE,AND THE HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING REQUEST BECAUSE OF KING COUNTY CUTBACKS. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: December 3, 2002 To: Gil Cerise From: Jennifer Henning A0 Swd"P Environmental Review Committee Subject: Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments LUA-02-121, ECF ERC Appeal Period We just wanted to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments Determination of Non-Significance. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7286. 1 i ., , _, NcyficE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: URBAN DESIGN DISTRICT OVERLAY CODE AMENDMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-121, ECF DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Proposed amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. This means that i projects of 2-4 dwelling units which are currently exempt from the Urban Center Design Guidelines would have to comply with the minimum design guideline standards. In addition, ' this code amendment corrects a mapping error left over from the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The map amendment would extend the Urban Center Design Guidelines to cover properties formerly zoned as CO that were rezoned to CD and RM-U via the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The proposed code amendment also includes correction of a scriveners error that references the wrong code section for Modifications. Location: Applicable to multi- family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. _ , ur., • it io, L .. . h, v6 % _ iI�It:I 0.ma ■IIIU:, /4" PIP I._, E i o.i :I MOM B *IMP r or-I tr:rj �� `` ••irrijka I -1C�1 I-•, '�! �i Lt S 2nd St ^ui'ii S nd v.,`,� % •II I RS'- ii �i I" II \ gramil r�7yuia s Egu eI aFT: p l 74 . -s"' ,.....-... it=a a W I " LI IV rg i I# will a� Oa SW lh Sl ■/tea i:iI G_®® IN Giii 1 nii An, ' , 'r ' = c r ''' �_ �3 `l FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT'REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include.the,'project�(VUMBEl2.',w i en.calling;for proper file,'identification. ws NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments LUA-02-121, ECF Proposed amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. Location: Applicable to multi-family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: November 18, 2002 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot CITY L i‘ RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 15, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on November 12,2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE URBAN DESIGN DISTRICT OVERLAY CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-02-121, ECF Proposed',amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. This means that projects of 2-4 dwelling units which are currently exempt from the Urban Center Design Guidelines would have to comply with the minimum design guideline standards. In addition, this code amendment corrects a mapping error left over from the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The map amendment would extend the Urban Center Design Guidelines to cover properties formerly zoned as CO that were rezoned to CD and RM-U via the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The proposed code amendment also includes correction of a scrivener's error that references the wrong code section for Modifications. Location:applicable to multi-family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:.Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way„Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6578 For the Environmental Review Committee, CsijAasj Gil Cerise Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources • WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure Agency lat..d.c\ RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �� AHEAD OF THE CURVE :.• This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer 1 I CITY OF RENTON . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-121, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. This means that projects of 2-4 dwelling units which are currently exempt from the Urban Center Design Guidelines would have to comply with the minimum design guideline standards. In addition, this code amendment corrects a mapping error left over from the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The map amendment would extend the Urban Center Design Guidelines to cover properties formerly zoned as CO that were rezoned tto CD and RM-U via the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The proposed code amendment also includes correction of a scrivener's error that references the wrong code section for Modifications. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Applicable to multi-family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION'DATE: November 18,2002 DATE OF DECISION: November 12,2002 SIGNATURES: 1 //10(-Wit_ *22-- reg9Zmmandministrator DATE f Departm t f PI g/Building/Public Works '•Ji Shepherd, Adm. istrator k DAl ` mmunity Services Department //' /Y— °./ Fi i DATE R to Fire Department dnssignature CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: November 12, 2002 To: Gil Cerise From: Jennifer Henning (C0/6 Environmental Review Committee Subject: Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments LUA-02-121, ECF On behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), I would like to inform you that they have completed their review of your project. The Committee, on November 12, 2002, decided that the project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 430-7286. dnsmm CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-121, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. This means that projects of 2-4 dwelling units which are currently exempt from the Urban Center Design Guidelines would have to comply with the minimum design guideline standards. In addition, this code amendment corrects a mapping error left over from the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The map amendment would extend the Urban Center Design Guidelines to cover properties formerly zoned as CO that were rezoned to CD and RM-U via the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The proposed code amendment also includes correction of a scrivener's error that references the wrong code section for Modifications. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Applicable to multi-family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton; 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 18, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 2002 SIGNATURES: _r IJ��y2 �� Ei li 7/C2a e regg Zim man, dministrator DATE Departme t f PI ning/Building/Public Works ‘L&kjid \Ji Shepherd, Admfiistrator DATE ommunity Services Department • Fi DATE Reg' Fire Department dnssignature STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: 11/12/02 Project Name: Urban Design District Overlay Code Amendments Project Number: LUA 02-121, ECF Project Manager: Gil Cerise Project Description: Proposed amendments to section 4-3-100 of Renton Municipal Code dealing with applicability of the Urban Center Design Guidelines would remove SEPA exempt projects from the exemption section of this code section. This means that projects of 2-4 dwelling units which are currently exempt from the Urban Center Design Guidelines would have to comply with the minimum design guideline standards. In addition, this code amendment corrects a mapping error left over from the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The map amendment would extend the Urban Center Design Guidelines to cover properties formerly zoned as CO that were rezoned to CD and RM-U via the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The proposed code amendment also includes correction of a scrivener's error that references the wrong code section for Modifications. Project Location: Applicable to multi-family projects within the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation. Exist. Bldg.Area gsf. N/A Site Area: N/A B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON—SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None. This is a non-project action. As a non-project action no new physical development is anticipated because of this text modification. Documentl City of Renton EDNSP Department Envii tntal Review Committee Staff Report Springbrook Associates Comprehensive Plan A,'endment/Rezone LUA-02-121,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 12,2002 Page2 of 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? NO IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED FROM THIS NON-PROJECT ACTION. NO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CODE TEXT AMENDMENT. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 2,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the,Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Documentl City of Re, Department of Planning/Building/Public V ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1) o. �� � c.2-S COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise PROJECT TITLE: 'Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use _ _ _ Utilities _ ___ Animals Transportation Environmental Health , Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 11107— Si. - r- ofM r or Authorized Represent ive Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Reriron Department of Planning/Building/Public(ti.. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: NOV I 02 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED .SOBER 28,21 02 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MAN' E": Gil Cerise PROJECT TITLE: Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NIA. - LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan Ito the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals I Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet \C '\ ° B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i,x,„ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • _ City of Re- Department of Planning/Building/Public V. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (13y\S uC o� 'eve%CQS COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 CITY OF RENTON APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise R E C i V t PROJECT TITLE: Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 OCT 2 8 2002 btltLBlNG DIVISION LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0/374;2-' Sig ature of Dire or Authorize Representative Date Routing (/ Rev.10/93 City of Re - Department of Planning/Building/Public I i ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .LA - /1Asc -eV COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise RENTON PROJECT TITLE: .Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 E �r^ E I�J E D LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation CITY OF OCT 2 G 2002 SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines.,In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health, Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. CAN COMMENTS N , C.�1 CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . � lr I/302.-• Si,n.'' re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routi ttRev.10/93 1 , . City of ReDepartment of Planning/Building/Public 14_..._ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT. yaIAS,pc.), COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO:, LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise PROJECT TITLE: Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 CITY OF RENTON BECElVED LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation ®CT 20O2 SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make tbni 111ti9CtaditIt §1i Jn guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water , Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 0 B. 11 POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS IV • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. S of Director or Authorized Representative a Rout ngU Rev.10/93 • City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public 14 u1,6 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `y- ev \ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMB_ER_8.,2Q02___._._.__ APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBEF 28,L2002-7 S �J i': L'� ; �,• ! APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise'1 I ;II PROJECT TITLE: 'Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 ; ; OCT 2 9 2002 '! ` 1 ' i I I LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation Cis`! OF Rt`;T(iN SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More • Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Aid C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • • • We have reviewed his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and h ve ide titled areas of probable impact or areas where additi nal informatio eeded to properly assess this proposal. -1)&14,1 d d Signature of bir or or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • • City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public• ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p`Gt./1 V I COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-121,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 28,2002 APPLICANT: City,of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Gil Cerise E r p LV iF Ii PROJECT TITLE:'Urban Design Code Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 77051 CITY OF RE9 YTON OCT 23 2002 LOCATION: Center Downtown Comp Plan designation BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code amendment adds the properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health. Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet pp 14,000 Feet • I V 44M1Q- B. POLICY-RELATED LATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Nci_ • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig to i9 of Director or Authorized Representative Da Routing Rev.10/93 A • • «®� '� Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gil Cerise,Senior Planner,Economic Development, . „CO Neighborhoods,&Strategic Planning Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 12 2002. it you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional NOTICE OF APPLICATION notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will autometica ly become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- CONTACT PERSON: GIL CERISE(425)430.657S SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) , PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE: October 28,2002 y=- �.-_rry lig J --=y Ibmi jinni, LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02.121,ECF :f��0w mar A'�nl Wa 1 ,��� APPLICATION NAME: URBAN DESIGN CODE AMENDMENT uN',t. ®�s�� ;��®1 Ify��1 v PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would op ./1®�°" lIaslllrais 1, j.,V (l'®r•' �� IN Im1111� ' —make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,end four-plexes.These multi-family ' �� �s1 a 1- °- � ��� developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition,the proposed code �� amendment adds all properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the -� �I _, Urban Center Design Overlay District- ���;'��:_o�III a`=�'1 ID- 1,� �' L� Imo. B`-mat. < PROJECT LOCATION: Center• Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation I �a >• _// tit 1�■! ®® ®1j(` b„slur marl Li n�Its:.. , OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton ��,� I;yIL�I�!= an ` jr1"�� , has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as T „•.1 ' I _.II II P. 0 permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Isill Iln 4 likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integrated into a single comment period. �. = -� L= There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance IONS).A 14- '- Or i /A I®® -„��day appeal period will follow the issuance of He DNS. 0` 1141_tom'I('''__ !=i47 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 25,2002 e� CP_.1 �- din .�a-4 MGM` =SI- .„,_,, t� NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 28,2002 sr�a_;tt �� \ass 11, APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: -I MI4� Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SOFA)Review i f .�"111. �'�, M_ _ Other Permits which maybe required: WA OOP Requested Studies: WA ' �4� iil>L Location where application may r�r�i=1_ ' be reviewed: PlanningiBuilding/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, �j r/�et . 5' 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: File No./Name:LUA•02-121,ECF/Urban Design Code Amendment Analytical process This non-project action supports the vision embodied in the City of Renton NAME: Comprehensive Plan and the City of Renton Business Plan Goals.The proposal applies urban center design guidelines toe wider array or projects in the Cnys ADDRESS: South Renton Subarea,helping to ensure quality development occurs in South Renton. TELEPHONE NO.: Land Use: N/A Environmental Documents that i Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: N/A Proposed Mitigation Measures: WA • I • NOTICE OF APPLICATION • NOTICE OF APPUCAmON CERTIFICATION • I, �,J c ,hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby . 02 `, the d i,r�i,�ed roperty on 0( e 90 Signen I ./ 9�G' �� ATTEST:Subscribed a a . orn before me,a Notary Public,in and for th:�:tate of Washi�hg-tan idiiig'-ff 1 .: a i ,on the �O day of Deyri• ADD. - • • NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYNKAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON L. MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 - COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 � _ �_ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: October 28, 2002 To: Gil Cerise, Senior Planner From: Andree DeBauw Subject: Project No.LUA-02-121,ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and,therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on Nov.12, 2002. Prior to that review,you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 430-7281, if you have any questions. Document2 ‘1N'NTO NOTICE OF APPLICATION • AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON • - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 28,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-121,ECF APPLICATION NAME: URBAN DESIGN CODE AMENDMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed Urban Center Design Guidelines Code Amendment would make the urban center design guidelines applicable to duplexes,triplexes,and four-plexes. These multi-family developments of 2-4 units are currently exempt from design guidelines. In addition, the proposed code amendment adds all properties that were rezoned from CO to CD as part of the South Renton Plan to the Urban Center Design Overlay District. • PROJECT LOCATION: Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14- day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 25,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 28,2002 . s APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: N/A Requested Studies: N/A • • Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process This non-project action supports the vision embodied in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and the City of Renton Business Plan Goals. The proposal • applies urban center design guidelines to a wider array of projects in the City's South Renton Subarea,helping to ensure quality development occurs in South Renton. Land Use: N/A Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: N/A • Proposed Mitigation Measures: N/A • NOTICE OF APPLICATION • r Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gil Cerise, Senior Planner, Economic Development, Neighborhoods,&Strategic Planning Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 12, 2002. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: GIL CERISE (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION k_41=11:El EL-_-_-_-_-- Ti...t.: A _fltv,i, . ®� �y 1 mill = =mom •unr y _ 04 _-_ �>: :ems L^= Airport Wa ► 40 M.. 4 N k2,d j 1441 L.:. / t — di:smut Mar II IlL 4.41131r. NZ=Fp a. ,As,, „Mph,Ilk SIM 1UiihfldS, "tM > (J , eiMEIiu1r . ? 3 II IN Lit. 7Ev P1 ,01, �� 3:, i _-,- ". A ntn `', ' .ill- y d �A7-�• c e\ • 5�r ' 9I a r INWIES - SW to st $ I ' • ,r iiiir/t ir, , = I',D Itlri .. . iv rap' a for -S Renton Village PI If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-121,ECF/Urban Design Code Amendment • NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: , • NOTICE OF APPLICATION /..4/4 0 2'-(2{ V City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(SFPNFR PR NNIN� PROJECT INFORMATION �N NAME: ®C T 2 r PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: R-©�'S 4,.0, ' �/U' U(?AIMJ c riV ,�: 'J, 5/6E4W ADDRESS: FIECEIVE 1'D l A/0-S PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: sae ATrla CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: �► EXISTING LAND USE(S):KG-cob-vs-el Cv�cFtE/'..CiPK-1 (>1"rY o F i`�1u�� l s►t�c�i/"/4 COMPANY(if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 14Cer`i —USCI eokli1R&C.146.i Ras mEivri ADDRESS: (a`td. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: � ���-0� ZIP: ,50 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION 1 (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: / 1��.-LJ1 /Z et-r CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): O,- NAME: 6-1 SITE AREA (in square feet): C I S SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED COMPANY(if applicable):/� , FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING C -i f oP Zavcni�/ ED1J r THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): ,w ADDRESS: (lied- . /O�J so' a — JDY & �' 4 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE(if applicable): 74(g- CITY: ZIP: O te i4c-0e � 5 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable): W/- TELEPH NE NUMBER AND E-M I-,I ADDRESS: ZS j 7>0 ' 1-6 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable):AM c.47, renzipil LCS Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformmasterapp.doc06/25/02 F ___)JECT INFORMATION (cont_._.,-led) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): 1,1(A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): VIA ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): w/A ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): )J/, ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. applicable): 1,0 ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. NEW PROJECT(if applicable): N/',/;�- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION , TOWNSHIP , RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) , declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the az„,:ty 63,2 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ..(Signature-ef ewner{Representative)&PPL(C $J Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Q:\WEB\PW\DEV SERV WFORM\aformmasterapp.doc06/25/02 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax:425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc06/25/02 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: f rz g,s C c� P�oU I S10 PY C ci n u(ZG(§N C ikor - . Ds5/6-Al 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: e,151, or CZ.p4-ro.J 1`=? ig,gJ( x) Cierr 671i- f - D I o 5S -So 6-re-I D( Wr4Y gad0) W6- *7,o-s-S 4. Date checklist prepared: tarrAk. D64-7)g ,fz 211 z_00 Z- 5. Agency requesting checklist: . (Afl' v F P,y`iJ`r i I 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): WA NoP-"PPS 1EGc Ifiv,J 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. J f- 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. (A' 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. CATY 6r'P,P'—o L 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. -PPePrg Pam;�S U�Rs-r� t rca Wm -0 6E•tiv c dives ,ro y awe' 06. unlit og 1-ESS cor r c.Y MPT. MULTI-FMILY Pgo.Iecrs of � urz6i C 2 �€�;G Gv;,� �N � 21_ 400 F�.C� J S q1-fg steetiGtt&ZLl' 0 �➢i :1: FR- CdMytEGc.t/h-L OFFic� o) T LCN�E2 �c vN :c-IJ Cop) kb' `TD '.�i�S F'� 71+ �JU 1�Pf �� ;'2o�o(CS&z �v Cu�p.��s �- Re SuL� o f -3-/a1. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (Tt& cDi.01.. ,'zit,MD 0h1PR-g Nsit PJ g,s1G-Wrza,0 tcicml-afe,D MAP. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . pi NoN�' b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) 011,, c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. NI d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. aJ Or e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Nf�- f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. pJ'A- , g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? 7.1/A- h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Of A Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. cif Jar b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NI Pr c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: W/ft 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 1.1 r1k 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. u f 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. P/er 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NT A 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. j/tar 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Q,l(pc Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Our 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc:). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. WO, c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. kJ Or _ 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. k1/P d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: WA' 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: NI Pr deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen.tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Jf^r c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. p rk d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: WA. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 5 • 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 14(A Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. OA c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain N/A d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 14 Or b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. WA. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: tj(A- 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. t( 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: O(N Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Or& 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. WA' Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: wA 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 44{� b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. /'P d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C.`DN 21M - ' Rt�/a f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? e '— `»` � � g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? j'] h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, N/A- specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NIA • Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? W/''a- k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: gm- Proposed I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ?J( 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. g(a b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Mar c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: OA- 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. y Jf- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NTH c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: n�a Pita po s45-L_ Lin Li_ t ate tto f{s. r1cS �- f (N i dot(/M 16-N (,v t OCG.(NeS TO G lrfcg._ 4AM Poise. PP-0 7 cam. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? CO! b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 8 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: iki/A_ 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? J f b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Q J(j? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: (R 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N'm- b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. WA- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/kt" 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Oro b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance.to the nearest transit stop? flat c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? WOr Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? qj e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. j/A- f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. t g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: if k 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. or b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/h- 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Ism b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. th1(A- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (� arrza\--/ eimfbh- / Name Printed: C-7t91 &c 7S� 6' d i2 Date: PO/2 1f : - Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 10 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS These.;sheet;; s0i"iulti';:oiil�`:'be:;40.0..0:0.061,4 r�volr ij �deaision0t01, o,011 ' T'")arcs:;; ���, •�;� �. - �';-, Y�., ,�,�r ,�a.. �., ,9�,., ..-::�;.��,�;::-Pub:,., ,,,�R �, 4• ro rams -1'ou�d %knottieed-.tci�fll,=out;.ttiese4'sheets��for ro'�ctYact�onss: k-�=`=°:-a•;:,::���;���° r,,>:{%. ��.,.;, Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? WA Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N'1'zi 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Nr4. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: MO- 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? woci.. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N i . 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;:such as parks, wilderness, • wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? y f rAr Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? IU'/l, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 11 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? utP" Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: DJffr 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 32(2oP-aso- GALL 11vtr CAN FL. 4.11 1'kl" L c -, S ogP-r.►-L Fob- PfeDc'eexr-ro/0 o� Ef\bv l( tt) SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent al 6 4 Name Printed: 4 tr/ Ce-f'A-P_� et r? 1 Date: ja/z /Sj-e— ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformenvchlst.doc 12 4 -� - __ _ i _ > 1 ...— - • E- Emma Air o > ..6 k..„ .... � ti — > —ai =alinr F-. 'f''-i11111111 '. "j' lEn V ___r— r ►� mi _,_ �1 7` m' —f. I I , �iu i, ,•' _ 1 __ocu _ram 'a -� ply �-" .►^.. '::�'i�, MY Vr Airport Way ��n = " A. mum. 1 1 1 i \oe* `. 2.,17; --17.1wi L-...-1-jr- ill i"-- /* K 1l �I r#abl stPr ■ . II a— V Iwo .. v. Aik 111/1 a 'D-. -7—= __ . IP* icto . dm in. WI1 -I IL ¢ �1 !r. -- 1 - • j I �a , ragi �i S 2nd St IVS 2nd S ' ■a - — , C MR o II ! �= N� � i — N PI V . �PIP�AIII um. .,,,,,..... _L_, _,. HI I~n ■I■ ''II -I [1, 111 i -,-.-!. =,r.... ==., m.v0e is, A I bo4 I c o an ,� A °'. th p1 . : i r 6)_7\001ITA ' 41IWiiiaII _ 1111 1IIF — � os _/ _swa _ __di._ =., Pla—rar. y/ 4 .. WI SW 7th St i� _. — �1 (In' 11.1: I ,--, 1 F -n 1 A ¢ _� o nth 'Zia' s 11 Sw Grod way , i Ilia — _ --e 1 001 _ -S Renton Village PI , _= il W° ' — I cr, III I Q 1 mk S 15th •St e� A• ' ■■■■f_ 1r41 i ■A �vra IM e� um IIN �o\ S 1116MiI co ' , ' I. IF V I > la I j.-- 0 li u.,,, ktcnS1h v` /hit am slum I ip �_c , S 1 th St ``J, 0�S19thSI. 1 JJW 1 ¢ we*�Iej° PROPOSAL SUMMARY The existing Urban Center Design Guidelines do not apply to duplexes,triplexes, or four-plexes because they are SEPA exempt. In addition,the South Renton Neighborhood Plan rezoned some Commercial Office(CO)properties to Center Downtown(CD)along the north side of Grady Way. When this was done,the Urban Center Design Overlay map was not altered to include these properties. The Proposed code amendment removes the duplexes,triplexes, and four-plexes from the Urban Center Design Guideline exemption, and applies the Urban Center Design Guidelines to properties rezoned from Commercial Office(CO)to Center Downtown(CD)as part of the South Renton Neighborhood Plan. This code amendment will apply minimum design guidelines to multi-family projects of two to four dwelling units, improving aesthetics for small multi-family projects in the area. In addition,the code amendment proposal corrects the oversight of not including the properties rezoned from Commercial Office(CO)to Center Downtown(CD) in the Urban Center Design Overlay. This code amendment also corrects a scrivener's error that makes an erroneous reference to another section of Code in RMC 4-3- 100C.3. 4-3-100 URBAN CENTER DESIGN OVERLAY B. APPLICABILITY: 1. This Section shall apply to all attached residential development and commercial/residential mixed use development in the Residential Multi-Family-Urban(RM-U) and Center Downtown(CD)zones as defined on the Urban Center Design Overlay District Map shown in subsection B2 of this Section. a. Exemptions: i. Interior Remodels: Interior remodels of existing buildings or structures provided the alterations do not modify the building facade. cEu A Exempt Developme„ts: n 11 development c.,tegoric.,ll„_exempt a t>, State Env;re menta Policy et-(chapter 43 21 C T?CW a chapter 1 9 7 1 1 W A C) ..nd. ,..de. iro -gent.,U eview Procedures. 5. Urban Center Design Overlay District Map: (See New Map) C. ADMINISTRATION: 3. Modification of Minimum Standards: The Development Services Director shall have the authority to modify the minimum standards of this Section subject to the provisions of RMC 4-9-250BD provided a development as a whole meets the intent of the regulations in subsections D,E,F and G of this Section. Exception: Modifications to the requirements in subsections RMC 4-3-100D1a(i) and Dla(ii)are limited to the following circumstances: a. When the building is oriented to an interior courtyard, and the courtyard has a prominent entry and walkway connecting directly to the public sidewalk; or b. When a building includes an architectural feature that connects the building entry to the public sidewalk; or c. In complexes with several buildings,when the building is oriented to an internal integrated walkway system with prominent connections to the public sidewalk(s).