HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 03/16/2009AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
March 16, 2009
Monday, 7 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Fire and Emergency Services Department Compliance with HB 1756 Report
b. Renton Heart Month Wrap -Up Report
4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the
Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record,
SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 3/9/2009. Council concur.
b. Mayor Law appoints Robert J. Ingersoll to the Airport Advisory Committee for an unexpired
term expiring on 5/7/2010 (position previously held by Frank Marshall). Refer to Community
Services Committee.
c. City Clerk submits recommendation of the City's cable consultant to perform no additional cable
television rate review for the period of 7/1/2008 through 6/30/2009, and to adopt resolutions to
issue rate orders preserving the City's rights. Council concur. (See 8.a. and 8.b. for resolutions.)
d. Community and Economic Development Department submits 60% Petition to Annex for the
proposed Earlington Annexation and recommends a public hearing be set on 4/6/2009 to consider
the petition; approximately 100 acres located east of 80th Ave. S., north of S. 134th St. Council
concur.
e. Community Services Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $46,870
with Farrow Concrete Specialists for sidewalk replacement and repairs at Cedar River Park.
Council concur.
f. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Langley Meadows
Final Plat, a 70-lot subdivision located east of Hoquiam Ave. NE, north of NE 6th St. Council
concur. (See 8.c. for resolution.)
g. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional
right-of-way in the vicinity of NE 5th Pl. to fulfill a requirement of the Doyea Short Plat (SHP-
08-020). Council concur.
h. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum #2 to CAG-06-174, consultant
agreement with R.W. Beck, in the amount of $17,394 for additional services and to extend the
contract expiration date to 12/31/2009. Council concur.
i. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $113,500 with
Roth Hill Engineering for the Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates/Geodatabase
Development, Phase II project. Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topic may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Federal Lobbyist Services Contract with Petrizzo Strategic Group
b. Planning and Development Committee: Release of Restrictive Covenants Request from
Washington State Auto Dealers Association; Extending Validity Periods of Land Use
Applications*
8. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Comcast Cable television maximum permitted equipment and installation rates (See 6.c.)
b. Comcast Cable television maximum basic programming service rate (See 6.c.)
c. Langley Meadows Final Plat (See 61)
Ordinance for first reading:
Extending validity periods of land use applications (See 7.b.)
Ordinance for second and final reading:
2009 Budget amendment re: Water rights attorney fees (1st reading 3/9/2009)
9. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
10. AUDIENCE COMMENT
11. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
March 16, 2009
Monday, 6:00 p.m.
Community Planning Initiative - Roll Out
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-
CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11 AM & 9 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9 AM & 7 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1 PM & 9 PM
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact......
Subject:
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
aI aD
AJLS/Mayor's Office
Denis Law, Mayor
Airport Advisory Committee Appointment:
Mr. Robert J. Ingersoll
Exhibits:
Community Service Application
Recommended Action:
Refer to Community Services Committee
For Agenda of: March 16, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Law appoints the following to the Airport Advisory Committee:
Mr. Robert J. Ingersoll, 11224 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98178 (Airport Leaseholder
alternate position), for an unexpired term expiring on May 7, 2010 (position previously held by
Frank Marshall).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm Mayor Law's appointment of Mr. Ingersoll to the Airport Advisory Committee.
0
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE
If you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards,
comrn,Is oxys„car es, please complete this application and return it to:
. aNN in'�' s
Office of the Mayor
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Check the boards/commissions/committees in which you are interested.
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION*
❑ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION* ❑ ADVISORY COMMISSION ON DIVERSITY*
❑ HOUSING AUTHORITY* ❑ SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE*
❑ HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - CUAUTLA
❑ LIBRARY BOARD* ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - NISHIWAKI
❑ MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION* ❑ NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION ADV CMTE
❑ PARKS COMMISSION*
* Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.rentonwa.gov or call 425-430-6500 for details.
Your application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur.
MR. ® M
ADDRESS
PHONE: DAY Z�,�— ;7%.;2 -�Tg,.51
RENTON RESIDENT? / u'O
CITY OF FORMER
NIGHT :5-4 vM-
IF SO, SINCE WHEN?
DATE.Vdil Z-S
ZIP CODEe791
57 , 1 - A
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND 6;2-f6ik e4 i ��t�/1 �' :s . f `Y `°
'el I
-16
�t � ,9 F
OCCUPATION Eli 1!1` 9�G EMPLOYER 7 4 O—,4eO
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND?JP % [ yr ��� 4 O !� ��r�6�.� f�'1 •'��L�'fVS
/d g
a
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES (organizations/clubs/service groups, etc.) -X0elw
REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMIS ION/COMMITTEE
�E Jr�� ,+�vz G ,✓,�-v�'/� y `' 2,5 f Gte r SSA � ' /JoA) P �./Co A,) l J-4-7 �
CAN ATTEND DAY MEETINGS? `Y CAN ATTEND NIGHT MEETINGS?
Applications will be kept on Tile for one year. If you have questions about serving on a board,
commission, or committee, please feel free to contact the Mayor's Office at 425-430-6500.
Y._ 4
Z
7rw't� 5 . C' VAA e-
�
e
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton
City Clerk/Cable Manager, x6502
Comcast filing with FCC of Rate Forms 1240 and
1205 for period of 7/l/2008 through 6/30/2009
nlnits:
Issue Paper
Consultant Analysis & Recommendation
Resolution regarding Form 1240
Resolution regarding Form 1205
Al N:
March 16. 2009
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
KI
X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept......... X
Council Concur Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
ACTION:
The annual basic cable rate adjustment proposed for the City of Renton by Comcast Communications,
Inc., for the period of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, has been reviewed by the City's cable
consultant, Michael Bradley of Bradley and Guzzetta, LLC, St. Paul, Minnesota. On July 1, 2009; the
rates became effective, however, the City has 12 months from the date Comcast filed Forms 1240 and
1205 in which to review and act on those forms. If the City takes no action within the 12-month review
period, the City cannot at a later date order a refund or a prospective rate reduction with respect to the
current rate filing. If the City wishes to take action on the April 1, 2008 rate filings, it must do so by
March 31, 2009.
For Renton subscribers, the Maximum Permitted Rate (MPR) for basic cable under this filing remains
unchanged at $12.90 per month. Comcast is currently charging $12.58 for its basic service tier
programming (Limited Cable Package). Renton continues to have one of the lowest basic cable rates in
the area. Comcast has increased its maximum permitted rates on installations and equipment from the
2006 settlement levels, but continues to charge below the maximum permitted rates. Expanded basic and
premium channels are not within the City's scope of review.
The cable consultant has described four options for addressing Comcast's Forms 1240 and 1205, as
attached, with Option C, "Perform No Additional Review and Issue a Rate Order Preserving the City's
Rights" being recommended.
'STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the recommendation of the cable consultant, perform no additional cable television rate review
for the period of 7/'1/2008 through 6/30/2009, and adopt resolutions to issue rate orders preserving the
City's rights going forward.
Th,& CAYN �ri ary-b*�.
.options tions,rqs,049 VO l 24b ar d I' ;as foll.,ows;
The, %cA.y"could elect tp%pqrf v�,Ao review of the Formst�4 Ah4:12,0 a1&411 ow Corn cas
s,
:basin
proposedservice and equzpent rates and -,rrstallatzon'charges tlo-become "tum lip
expnth review I ration of ihb; t.2,74n z,,b
Doing AM — permissible
cA.1ul
Cq5ge,
4� FR
40IN N�acfi ii:OrOxPenditure offunds:isrequired The City would r8maiil
c rt,1.56,
to rool""af =,afid,d fUtUi& .,.:, �Poq (�Vlpw aftdadton Cbmeast.
2.1 Poicnfial::Drawb.kU,
R. Ukl6ruftl
I of 4
re %7e�v a ;decer#a csrt oti'not ce and to ioo '. t the factual priding underlying the dec s"ion
withdi aw cert#cation S 4 CF k § ' 16 9 i 7,
Li Fotepal Benefits;
The City wo�uld,a old. spent ing time tir limited: funds'revie VIii Coriicast's basic se vt e:�nci
eruipent rates,d,ittstaiatiori,charges. 1?urids thatT'would have Aden devoted .to ratc•regulation
could be realicxcatedo other Ymportantassues; ;such as compliance with: eustozrer service`
starzdards.aif the development%revision-o,ngh, of Evay ordinances• The City'woulci,.ho ever
iiur tie ,cosiing.a cieeertificat;on pet%ton. with the i~C:'
,oeai subsObers could bemfit if Corncast doclmed to file: ran effective cozripetitrori petrt ors with.
the FCC at some futi7re date as a result of decertification because fhe service tier buythroug$:
prpitian rid a'untfdrm.rate rules remain in effect unless the UGC determines :effectue
cgtnpetition A the ,fraricliise area. See l G..E;R § 76-.92:1.
2!., Potential TDra�ub•a�ks
As a.general rn°atter,'tiie Gty could no ;1'onger ensure filar Comcast's basic seryzce anel equipriaerit
r'ate`s, and xnstall;atiori' charges comport with F.GC rules, Since the Cify would•no longer t?e
engaging°in rate regcilatiori; Comcast would no longer be recluir-.ed to file rate for -ins supporting its.
ratencre iases: This mayb� if%om ant; since Ccast is not currently subject`;to effective
competition n.the City s:franchise area; and may be' able to implementrnonopoly pricing:.Ir
this regard, rnt st cable rate icier"..eases haute signif cantly outpaced i flation increases , I opal,
subscribers rn:ay perceive the City as , donifig therm to rile pnc ng.v�hiYns of'Comcast should.
the City abandon its.,regulatory abxl`ity Given :that boinbast'may l e charging aximum,
pernrttEd;rates ,for basic cable service, th'ss could become;a sensitive political _ asue Further:.; cif"
tl�e City wishes to re institute rate regulation in. the fixture, should si•gnifiant issues arise, in fhe
future. or if the:,FCG'srules crdecisioiis change in a favorable mariner especial y in,ltght of the
Oliama ad`minstratoi, there may be disputesbut vvliat historical ,calculations and data maybe
rov eWecl';; anri )Oat information Mist be provieled. Such disputes. may;make it iifficult to°
reguiae rates effectivl going ferward'f the City;re-certified As rmpbrtant; fire Gt would l.e
unabie.to monitor any impacts tlie:'te VJarnerfCoincast transfer has had o�ri local rates:
Corisegintly, ,tf would be,alinost impossible to enforce any°;applicable rate related condYtlbrs Sri
transfer and settlement: agreements:
Perform N A-4,4414A-e L 6 Y "Rkhts;-
_j4� i"q L-g
qf� e 0 Pli
could forego, asubstant
pi-Tn 124 T d i,
ib, 5.fil a April
�`ssue rate order that'xeitiiex a'p-p-raVes nor. .disapproves COM;C4§' s 'PT rates,butbut Preserves.
'anynglts Y, a,y.nave,"going-Om sluchah orderW'dfldlAveto be,adopted within the, 1,2-
1no th'tpyiew period-P A '0xand e"tlb F C'"s rater. ... .. Cori rules.
III '.Potential Benefits
Elie City wo , uId"'nt need to§P-eiid tlie,time: or funds,.oa',.sub�tan Ve '�llfi- review ofCo cast s rgfta�
forms At tl�e sarxze future 'to- look- at,
tithe,
4Y _d"V,
&C, m If fflts,44ghts the
for fu el
e-data d
-to extent "Itt -Alt ��kn CA, A aw., 8UO p
apprOach;rhaY q$. authority W_1e pngfilzlI ho
-Lib iv n,the,,,F,,b 1-2 2, 0 A��w wilmn �'ht b-66, substantively o Forms 46",
2 PbUntial Drawbacks
3 of 4
�Zeer��um,end�%#�p
uen tl .t we:do not J�eve any benefrf would`be derived from a; substye analysis o
cowoases,o„rii ; I;AO we do ,b reedrr i ieion D this year.. Dption D would
also, h��e;� szgnx�eanfi�budge�ary inpac� Ii� q�Zbn �? is n.�t�pnrsu�ed, we;recoxn`inenc' that tlie
Crt� �uxsue Opfon C (�xeservation ofxiglits ort'er). 't?Ve do .;not rec;csmmertd d;�certifyng at this
time; b:excuse. the. irawbacks :outweigh fie bex e ts, :as dese bed b9ve„ VV e also do nqt
xeeQmineid iriactxon, since the City risks ;losing; ceriain rights, anei because Opt%n C rate otdei s
can er ar paxed; nexpensively, rr� tight of'previo�ts e pxrrezaxe..�i Optio ,C drat rate ord..r *n
t e; farm of Resolution s attached, Elie Cityhas izot dory :this ii? ;the past,
4'tt4t4g, f `JL a ty
Iv�icl��et i2 Br�zil�y;
�ans��t�tzi;t
il, 4gWA�tiis:;
4 of 4
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REGARDING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BASIC PROGRAMMING
SERVICE RATE SET FORTH IN THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION FORM 1240 FILED BY COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS LLC ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2008.
WHEREAS, Section 623 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §
543, as amended, authorizes local franchising authorities, such as the City of Renton,
Washington (hereinafter the "City"), to regulate rates for basic cable service; and
WHEREAS, the City is certified as a rate regulation authority pursuant to the rules of the
Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter "FCC"); and
WHEREAS, Comcast Cable Communications LLC (hereinafter "Comcast"), the local
franchise holder, filed with the City an FCC Form 1240 "Updating Maximum Permitted Rates
for Regulated Cable Services", on or about April 1, 2008, purporting to set forth and justify the
maximum rate it could charge to subscribers for basic cable service (hereinafter the "2008 FCC
Form 1240"); and
WHEREAS, the rate set forth herein will govern Comeast's basic service rate until
Comcast lawfully implements a further rate change pursuant to applicable FCC regulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. Comeast's maximum permitted rate for basic cable service, as
calculated in the 2008 FCC Form 1240, is neither approved nor denied, but may: (i) function as a
RESOLUTION NO.
basic service rate ceiling during the relevant rate period; and (ii) be utilized in future basic
service rate filings, to the extent permitted and consistent with FCC rules and decisions.
SECTION III. Comcast shall not charge any rate higher than the applicable
maximum permitted rate set forth in the 2008 FCC Form 1240, nor increase that rate, unless such
rate is first filed with and approved by the City, in accordance with applicable law and
regulations, including but not limited to the notice requirements imposed by 47 C.F.R. §
76.1603, or as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law and regulations.
SECTION IV. Comcast may charge rates less than the lawful maximum permitted
rates for basic service, as long as such rates are applied in a uniform and nondiscriminatory way,
pursuant to applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The City, however, shall not
be deemed to have approved such rates.
SECTION V. This Resolution is based on the representations made by Comcast
in its 2008 FCC Form 1240. Should information come to the City's attention that these
representations were inaccurate in any material way; the City reserves the right to take
appropriate action. This Resolution is not to be construed as a finding that the City has accepted
as correct any specific entry, explanation, calculation or rate in the 2008 FCC Form 1240.
SECTION VI.
The City reserves all of its rights with respect to rate regulation,
including (but not limited to): (i) the right to request and review data and documents concerning
the 2008 FCC From 1240 in order to determine the impact, if any, such data and documents have
on rates proposed in future basic service rate filings; (ii) the right to address issues raised in the
2008 FCC Form 1240 that are relevant to any City review of subsequent basic service rate
filings; and (iii) the right to request additional information concerning the 2008 FCC Form 1240
that is relevant to any City review of subsequent basic service rate filings.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION VII. This Resolution constitutes a written decision for purposes of 47
C.F.R. § 76.936(a).
SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval
by the City.
SECTION VIX. This Resolution shall be released to the public and to Comcast, and
a public notice shall be published stating that this Resolution has been issued and is available for
review, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 76.936(b).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of )2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES :1401:2/ 19/09: scr
Denis Law, Mayor
3
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REGARDING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED EQUIPMENT AND
INSTALLATION RATES SET FORTH IN THE FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FORM 1205 FILED BY COMCAST
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2008.
WHEREAS, Section 623 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §
543, as amended, authorizes local franchising authorities, such as the City of Renton,
Washington (hereinafter the "City"), to regulate rates for equipment and installations; and
WHEREAS, the City is certified as a rate regulation authority pursuant to the rules of the
Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter "FCC"); and
WHEREAS, Comcast Cable Communications LLC (hereinafter "Comcast"), the local
franchise holder, filed with the City an FCC Form 1205 "Determining Regulated Equipment and
Installation Costs, `Equipment Form"', dated April 1, 2008, purporting to set forth and justify the
rates it proposed to charge to subscribers for equipment and installations (hereinafter the "2008
FCC Form 1205"); and
WHEREAS, the City provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the
2008 FCC Form 1205; and
WHEREAS, the rates set forth herein will govern Comcast's equipment rates and
installation charges until Comcast lawfully implements a further rate change pursuant to
applicable FCC regulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
S
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. Comcast's maximum permitted rates and charges for equipment
and installation, as calculated in the 2008 FCC Form 1205, are neither approved nor denied, but
may function as a rate ceiling during the relevant rate period.
SECTION III. Comcast shall not charge any rates higher than the applicable
maximum permitted rates set in the 2008 FCC Form 1205, nor increase those rates, unless such
rates are first filed with and approved by the City, in accordance with applicable law and
regulations, including but not limited to the notice requirements imposed by 47 C.F.R. § 76.932,
or as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law and regulations.
SECTION IV. Comcast may charge rates less than the lawful maximum permitted
rates for equipment and installation, as long as such rates are applied in a uniform and
nondiscriminatory way, pursuant to applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The
City, however, shall not be deemed to have approved such rates.
SECTION V. This Resolution is based on the representations made by Comcast
in its 2008 FCC Form 1205. Should information come to the City's attention that these
representations were inaccurate in any material way; the City reserves the right to take
appropriate action. This Resolution is not to be construed as a finding that the City has accepted
as correct any specific entry, explanation, calculation or rate in the 2008 FCC Form 1205.
SECTION VI. The City reserves all of its rights with respect to rate regulation,
including (but not limited to): (1) the right to request and review data, and documents concerning
the 2008 FCC From 1205 in order to determine the impact, if any, such data and documents have
on rates proposed in future equipment and installation rate filings; (ii) the right to address issues
raised in the 2008 FCC Form 1205 that are relevant to any City review of subsequent equipment
and installation rate filings; and (iii) the right to request additional information concerning the
2
RESOLUTION NO.
2008 FCC Form 1205 that is relevant to any City review of subsequent equipment and
installation rate filings.
SECTION VII. This Resolution constitutes a written decision for purposes of 47
C.F.R. § 76.936(a).
SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval
by the City.
SECTION VIX. This Resolution shall be released to the public and to Comcast, and
a public notice shall be published stating that this Resolution has been issued and is available for
review, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 76.936(b).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES :1400:2/ 19/09: scr
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2009.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
;c omcast
'Other lnstallatiQ-O-Relocate WOO'.23
40 .
` 16M.
Other Itstallatiori-iTpgrarie (npn-addressable)`
17 73;
14,99
`O,ther`Installation=Downgrade (non addressable)'
-
11.94
19.99
. .
Other Iinstallation UpgradeCDowngrade (addressable)
1.99
1.99
Conrieet VCR -Connect Ln tial:
g,q0
5 99
Connect VCR=Connect Separate
14:59
13.3.5.
,Remote Contrpl (All Units)
0.31
0:1-5
Converter BQx (Baszc Service Onl'y,.)
1.14
1;00
Con -vertex Box (All Others: Excltiding THM
3.43
3.20;
Converter Box (AID & HDDVR)
9,91
8.00
CableCARD _ .
2:05
N/C
2nd CableCARD T'iVo Seftes VCPE reg4zr h' Znd CableCA:RD
2.05
1 J
-Customer Trouble C11
29..70
19..99
*'Non-standard installations .are based on the houxly service charge times actual time spent
on, the activity
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
...........5 .,-emu.
Dept/Div/Board.. CED/Long Range Planning
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias x.6576
Earlington Annexation - Acceptance of 60 % Direct
Petition
Issue Paper
60% Direct Petition
King County Certification Document
For Agenda of:
March 16, 2009
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur. Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
Y OF ACTION:
The Council received a 60 % Direct Petition to Annex on January 28, 2009, to annex
approximately 100-acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area. The proponent's petition has been certified by King County as having
signatures representing at least 60 % of the area's assessed valuation.
Under State law, the Council is required to hold a public hearing to consider the annexation
petition and the zoning in order to provide interested parties the opportunity to speak.
Following the public hearing, Council may approve the annexation of all or any portion of the
area proposed for annexation. The site is currently designated Residential Single Family (RSF)
and Residential Medium Density (RMD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
The proposed zoning for the annexation area includes R-8, R-10, and R-14.
The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the
Boundary Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60 % Direct Petition.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set April 6, 2009, for a public hearing to consider the 60 % Direct Petition and in the matter of
the proposed zoning, as well as to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent
package to the Boundary Review Board for King County.
K-y 111 CITY OF RENTON
R
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
s DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 9, 2009
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: ' Alex Pietsch, Administrator x6592
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias x6576
SUBJECT: Earlington Annexation - Acceptance of 60% Direct
Petition to Annex
ISSUES:
Whether the City Council should accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex from the
Earlington annexation area now that the petition has been certified by the King County
Department of Assessments?
If the City Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, the Administration should be directed
to forward the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review
Board.
RECOMMENDATION:
• Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex the 123.69-acre
Earlington Annexation site;
• Council authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent for
the Earlington Annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King
County for their review.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
At its August 18, 2008, public meeting, Council accepted the 10% Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation petition and authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition to
annex. City of Renton departments reviewed the annexation proposal and all staff
reported that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and
systems. There were no issues identified that would impede the annexation. A more
detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments are contained in
the Department's July 28, 2008, Earlington Annexation 10% Notice of Intent issue paper.
Earlington Annexation — Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition
Zoning
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the annexation area is
Residential Single Family (RSF) and Residential Medium Density (RMD). The proposed
zoning includes R-8, which allows eight dwelling units per net acre; R-10, which allows
ten dwelling units per net acre; and R-14, which allows fourteen dwelling units per net
acre. The proposed Renton zoning is the most approximate match to the existing King
County zoning. A map of the proposed zoning is attached.
Full -Time Employee (FTE) Need
The table below summarizes by department an estimate of the theoretical full-time
employees the Earlington Annexation may create (a more detailed listing of FTE's by
section is attached). Each number indicates a fractional number of one full time
employee. The cumulative column represents the need created by all 60% Direct
Petitions to Annex and Unincorporated Island annexations occurring after November
2008. To date those annexations have included Mackay, Shamrock, Duvall South, Honey
Creek Estates, and Sunset East. None of these proposed annexations have been finalized,
however.
FTE DEMAND
Department
Earlington
Prior
Annexations
Cumulative
Administrative, Judicial, & City Attorney
.13
.15
.28
Community & Economic Development
.07
.42
.49
Finance & Information Services
.08
.16
.24
Human Resources
.02
.03
.05
Police
.44
.81
1.25
Fire & Emergency Management*
.45
.16
.71
Community Services
.24
.47
.71
Public Works
.37
.46
.83
* Mackay and Shamrock annexations only included Administrative fire staff because emergency
response is provided by Fire Districts 25 and 40 through contract. Earlington is not within the
service area for either FD #25 or #40.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Earlington Annexation has been certified as having sufficient signatures
representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable boundaries
and appears to comply with Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing staff raised
no objections to this annexation. The proposed Earlington Annexation furthers the City's
Business Plan goals and is in the general welfare and interest of the City. The
Administration recommends the Council accept the 60% Direct Petition and authorize
staff to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King
County.
Page 2 of 2
Earlington Annexation FTE's Based on Berk & Associates Analysis for the West Hill
AJS & City Attorney
Mayors Office
City Clerk
Hearing Examiner
Court Services
City Attorney
i otai
Comm & Econ Dev
vallln rlrivrar Fnrlinntnn FTF Previous FTE* Cummulative FTE
292 Population n/a n/a n/a
292 Population 0.02 0.03 0.05
292 Population 0.01 0.02 0.03
292 Population 0.05 0.10 0.15
292 Population 0.04 0.00 0.04
U.13 UA 0 U.LO
3,184
U.13 UA 0 U.LO
3,184
Commercial SF
0.00
0.08
0.08
Econ Dev
Fire
Emer enc Res onse 292 Population 0.45 0.16 0.61
Total 0.45 0.16 0.61
Community Services
Parks
Recreation Services
Human Services
Library
0
Park Acreage in Area
0.00
0.00
0.00
292
Population
0.10
0.23
0.33
292
Population
0.02
0.03
0.05
292
Population
0.12
0.21
0.33
Total 0.24 0.47 0.71
PBPW
Technical Services
Maintenance Services
Streets/Bridges/Sidewalks
Surface Water
Solid Waste Litter
Transportation Systems
Transportation Planning
Traffic Operations
Traffic Maintenance
Transportation Design and Const
100
Acreage of Area
0.05
0.09
0.14
3.43
Miles of Road in Area
0.10
0.09
0.19
100
Acreage of Area
0.05
0.09
0.14
292
Population
n/a
n/a
n/a
100
Acreage of Area
0.05
0.09
0.14
3.43
Miles of Road in Area
0.04
0.04
1 0.08
3.43
Miles of Road in Area
0.07
0.06
0.13
100
Acreage of Area
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total u.si u.40 v.ao
* Previous annexations accounted for in this estimate are: Mackay, Shamrock, Duvall South, Honey Creek Estates, & Sunset East
Bellevue
i t'Mercer Island L_�
I
Newcastle
iiy . ��t Brave'
Sierra Heights Elementary
l
r R
Mackay
Lake Washiugton
Seattle
1 West,Will_
i
Shamrock
Krail
\ 0 1 � { �- [ . � (f r L -.i+' { t I ��f -,Ji � �i'el }ti Y r�l�'' �n 114 ��F-s���r�� �''�3 {�c '✓ 6",i'L i7�il#:§ 3 e�
_ tn�Ir
\Y I - i'F" C� W�i„f ll ,SP X" �r r�
q 4 - spa 1 t i r >�tl t`t-�7'k fir•, [.al ,
afillI, iJ�IT' tiIP3C _ _
'�.1 '�
)' I _ �.� I�E l 1 t1l G r (ariICr»� t'fl Tj
tr_zn j
r,y, �tl t#��EI � jt__
\ ��r w 1�jj 1 •`•v S � �I—
t; `� s n �3 5 I L 1(_se t� II
�^ r 1ni �' J«„rJ��—
�� C[-; r yr� u?
14a k1 A 'ems 6'' .S.,r 043- S - Ilh '"'�'i I ti-s i
IO
'-•«•„r»,1�.•r�- wit _ �"
1'3��itfnT'nr iti�SFL6 J�-• IJI� I`—+
Earlington P 7 T9[I�*i - Duvall South {' 1,
[� Mall �I xI -+�,.� �..,... t
=_�/�
1: ;rrtr idtle, j :L .l 1 I' �' t * '.� ` p !�I K �I
Gr \ I !3c��rIT rr �� -� Maple Heights Elementary `-I' a I(s
\ ��it
1��>I'{il 1 �\ —�,t —� - Liberty High School
i L L L[i r Fa��� c cr!!{�11Jrc,
—AL_S
.r� - y + 111 t.'v Il r�"fEs• 1r,�lr �f 7 _
T• u r k w i i a sl�. _. _ -a �� ��i� i t_ }�.1� «' 1 , r - i_ 1 �1
r 1F" I ..t^`8 a 1 �'d21�S t I a
` �1 r a m 1 7l j
Cr ly i�'�I�I�>rl��tr'�+
�iLtj
_ ,1 Ilrj 1 L I t
I T
. I `� ?��- rl t , a s 1 t1_ i r .l,..t..,>
�a v`dt_ I r nil' r Ir � ,1� ,�.s , , Ft r
II .C${�t..r��y. _ -1tiff
11�93 e,j� L —{�C rh .;.> J _ m ,�
(jIn
l ��
u+.0 1 ily: I 11 I �L " I11
l e� �_ 5 a�.� r 1.P � � / a e.�l'Srl'e
Is, T_ i
m GS
7 � \—_> � _+ V i fl t,t =_ �I Shnrli'.kakr (Mtt� Like)
` Red Mill \ `'
Lake I'ortttgs \
Sprmgbrook Terrace
Greater Fairwood Communities ��
y
gip' o Department of Community
i & Economic Development
�'+
�ity o Renton
Proposed Annexations
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Adriana Johnson, Planning Technician
L- , City Limits
Petition Properly Owner Initialed. RedM ill, 241 School Property City Inillated, Liberty High School, 34
t PAA Boundary
Petition Property Owner Initiated, Shamrock, 124 �J School Property City Initiated, Maple Heights Elementary, 9
November 7, 2008 N
0 1,950 3,900 ��1
_l
Annexations Update November 2008
Resolution City Initiated, Brave, 23 (� School Property City Initiated, Sierra Heights Elementary, 15
Feet W
Type, Name, Acres
Resolution City Initiated, Duvall South, 12 � Voter Initiated, Fairwood, 3737
1:64 000
Petition Property Owner Initiated, Earlington,
101 Resolution City Initiated, Honey Creek Estates, 18 Voter Inili ed, West Hill, 1834
.,,, I I,
O Petition Property Owner Initialed. Krail, 70
I Resolution City Initiated, Springbrook Terrace, 21
.
Petition Property Owner Initiated, Mackay, 10
Resolution City Initiated, Sunset East, 16
-yj
S?o
a(D
-l') o
0 x :3 3 0
(D
wo 3
—
0
0
3 CD
<
(D 0
3
3
3
(D
1/6
m
-n
CD
0
ca
0
0 (n
C)
C)
CD
>--4
CD
Ln
CD CD
x
0
o
7A
(D
FA
vv
84th Ave
J , , Fled by Ron f1 I&r
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON4 �1 &'qdl
mf
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 406- ?90-91r/
(60 % Petition - Earlington Annexation) File -
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTOId
1055 South Grady Way JAN 2 8 2009
Renton, WA 98057 P.M.
C RECEIVED
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according FL RK'S OFFICE
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton.
We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of
RCW 35A.14.120 et seq.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of bitention" to commence annexation
proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW
35A.14.120 on August 4, 2008. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the
proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree
to:
(1) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan land use designation as it
affects the subject property; and
(2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the
subject property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of
such meeting.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
(a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such
proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted,
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their
approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the
Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the
above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in
force, and to receive City public services.
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
Page 1 of 2
Utica o� Department of Community
Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Adrian .Johnson, Planning Technician
Oroduced byOil,/ of Penton !cj 2008, the Cir of
n all rights reserved. No vlarranti?s of ana sort.
,luding but not limited to ac. uracy. fitness nr
merchantabilih;, a ccrnnan, this prcdu:-t.
Earlington Annexation
Legend Vicinity Map
ir,_'• Earlmyton Boundary
(7®9 City Limits
k_,j PAA Boundary
File Ilarna
,rh- tion`,nixd5,.'_=_arlingtcn_,icii;iiumxd
July 25, 2008 N
0 250 50
Feet
1:6,000 F
EARLINGTON ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Those portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East,
W.M. and the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,
in King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly right of way margin of Oakesdale Ave SW
and the southerly margin of the City of Seattle's Cedar River pipeline right of way, said
southerly margin also being the liinits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance
No. 3845;
Thence northerly along the northerly extension of said westerly margin crossing said
pipeline right of way and S 134`, St to an intersection with the northerly right of way
margin of said S 1341h St;
Thence southeasterly along said northerly margin to an intersection with the
southwesterly right of way margin of S Langston Rd;
Thence northwesterly along said southwesterly margin to an intersection with the
southerly extension of the westerly right of way margin of 801" Ave S;
Thence northerly along said southerly extension, crossing Said S Langston Road and S
132°d St, and continuing northerly along said westerly margin and the northerly extension
thereof, crossing S 130 ' St to an intersection with the northerly right of way margin of
said S 130t" St;
Thence easterly along said northerly margin and its easterly extension, crossing 80 Ave
S, Renton Ave S and 841h Ave S to an intersection with the easterly right of way margin
of said 84`h Ave S;
Thence northerly along said easterly margin to an intersection with the southerly right of
way margin of NW 3` St and the existing limit line of the City of Renton as annexed
under City of Renton Ordinance No. 1461;
Thence generally easterly, southerly and westerly along the said existing limits as
annexed under City of Renton Ordinance Nos. 1461, 1579, 1461, 1968, 1461, 1320,
2022, 1580, 1320, 1526, 3845, to the point of beginning.
1 of 1 06/20/2008 6:56 AM
Earlington Annexation, continued
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall he guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
Signature and
Mailing
Tax Lot Legal No.
Description
Date
Printed Name
Address
(Lot, Bloc, Plat, Assessor's
No. o other)
DT
2.
-
----------- -
3.
1/
/
-------
! S o G 6 S 7
4 �f o
Tec .- CtO V
lelb
4.
j I C)
--- �c r` "`�!`1� '`
, s FpvLes� fiw
cu ), l4 y F b D
i oA-lJ 6L NG ct�t'E
G?Z s r�tvl L'UAgh
/ 3 Z z 3
------------- -
c.
---------------------------------
7.
----------------------------- ----
�/--� ) O
8.
-----------------------
9.
------------ =--
-------------------------- =------
11.
---------------------------------
12.
---------------------------------
Page 2 of 2
LIM
King County
Department of Assessments
Accounting Division
500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0725
Seattle, WA 981.04-2384
(206) 296-5145 FAX (206) 296-0106
Email: assessbr.info@langcounty.gov
http://www.kin2count-
y.gov/assessor/
Scott Noble
Assessor
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted January 30, 2009 to
the King County Department of Assessments by Angie Mathias,
Associate Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation
to Renton of the properties described as the Earlington Annexation,
have been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of
Washington, Section 35A.01.040.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 2nd day of February, 2009
Scott Noble, King tounty Assessor
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #:
u viaaa...—b ...—..—
Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks
. — <.b.. u
March 16, 2009
Staff Contact...... Terry Flatley, x-6600
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
>ubject:
Contract Agreement - Farrow Concrete Specialists -
Correspondence..
Sidewalk Repairs at Cedar River Park parking lot
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
?xhibits:
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Contract & Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept......... Yes
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $46,870.00
Amount Budgeted....... $46,870.00 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $46,870.00 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Three proposals were obtained to perform sidewalk repairs in the parking lot area at Cedar River
Park. Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc. submitted the lowest cost proposal.
The location of the work is limited to the 20-year old asphalt sidewalks adjacent to the main parking
lots at Cedar River Park. Heaving, sinking and cracking of the existing walks necessitate replacement
to eliminate public safety concerns with the old asphalt sidewalks.
Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc. will remove approximately 4,000 square feet of damaged asphalt
sidewalk and replace it with concrete in accordance with Exhibit A - Scope of Work.
Work is expected to begin in March and will occur over several weeks. Park users will be notified 48
hours in advance of the work. The area will be protected with construction fencing.
Two Hundred Thousand dollars ($200,000.00) was budgeted in the 2008 Capital Improvement
Program for Sidewalk, Pathways and Patios under the Parks General Major Maintenance category.
Funds for this project have been submitted with the Department's 2009carried-forward request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the Contract Agreement with Farrow Concrete
Specialists, Inc. to perform sidewalk replacement and repairs at Cedar River Park parking lots.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
O:\PARKS\Parks Manager _City Forester\ParksDivision\Contracts\Pathways,Sidewalk,Patios and Boardwalks\Cedar River Park\2009 Agenda Bill FCS
Cedar River Walks.doc
ri
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
March 6, 2009
TO:
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:
Denis Law, Mayor 1
FROM:
Terry Higashiyama Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:
Leslie Betlach, Parks Director (x-6619)
Terry Flatley, Parks Manager/City Forester (x-6601)
SUBJECT:
Contract Agreement with Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc.
for Sidewalk Repairs at Cedar River Park Parking Lot
ISSUE
Should the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Contract Agreement with
Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc. to perform sidewalk repairs at Cedar River Park
parking lot?
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The sidewalks adjacent to the parking lot at Cedar River Park are in need of repairs. The
20-year old walks are heaving, cracking and sinking raising concerns for public safety.
Approximately 4,000 square feet of deteriorated asphalt walk require removal and
replacement with new concrete. The new walk will conform to the size of the existing
walks, will have a broomed-finished surface, and will be sealed.
Three proposals were submitted for this work and Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc.
provided the best service at the lowest cost to the City.
Exhibit A — Scope of Work provides detailed specifications for the sidewalk repairs.
CONCLUSION
The work is expected to take several weeks to accomplish. The area will be fenced to
protect park patrons and City staff. The public will be provided 48 hours advanced notice
prior to work proceeding.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Contract Agreement with Farrow
Concrete Specialists, Inc. in the amount of $46,870.00 to perform sidewalk repairs at
Cedar River Park parking lots.
CC: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Iwen Wang, FIS Administrator
O:\PARKS\Parks Manager City Forester\ParksDivision\Contracts\Pathways,Sidewalk,Patios and Boardwalks\Cedar River Park\2009
Issue Paper FCS Cedar River Walks.doc
CITY OF RENTON
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2009, between the
CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY"
and Farrow Concrete Specialities, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR," to remove
and replace sidewalks at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway, Renton, WA 98057.
The City and Contractor agree as set forth below.
1. Scope of Services, The Contractor will provide all material and labor necessary to perform all work
described in the Contractor's proposal and the Scope of Work, Exhibit A, which is included with this
Agreement.
2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the
Services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, the Contract Sum being adjusted
accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City
and the Contractor.
3. Time of Performance. The Contractor shall commence performance of the Contract no later than ten
(10) calendar days after Contract's final execution, and shall complete the full performance of the
Contract not later than 180 calendar days from the date of commencement.
4. Term Of Contract. The Term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the enclosed scope of work.
This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written
agreement of the City and the Contractor.
5. Contract Sum. The total amount of this Contract is the sum of $46,870.00 which includes
Washington State Sales Tax.
6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have
been performed and a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will
be made thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to
withhold payment to the Contractor for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time
as the Contractor modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory.
7. Performance Bond Required. A performance bond is required in accordance with RCW 39.08.010,
for the faithful performance of the contract. Exhibit "W provides a form that shall be completed by the
Contractor upon signing of the contract. The amount of the bond shall equal the contract sum.
Contractor shall conform to the provisions on the "Bond to the City of Renton Form."
8. Prevailing Wage Rates. By executing this Contract, the Contractor agrees to comply with the State
prevailing wage rate requirements.
9. Warranty. The Contractor warrants for itself and all of its employees that they have the requisite
training, skills, and experience necessary to provide the services specified in the Scope of Work and
are appropriately accredited and licensed by all applicable agencies and government agencies.
10. Independent Contractor. The Contractor and the City agree that the Contractor is an independent
contractor with respect to the services provided under this Contract. Neither the Contractor nor any
employee of the Contractor shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the
services provided under this Contract. The Contractor shall be responsible for paying all applicable
taxes including income and business taxes.
11. Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this
Contract without express written consent of the City of Renton.
12. Record Keeping and Reporting. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records which properly
reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this
Agreement. The Contractor agrees to provide access to any records required by the City.
13. Discrimination Prohibited. Contractor, with regard to work performed under this agreement, will not
discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, age, sex, the presence of
any physical or sensory handicap, or sexual orientation, in the selection and/or retention of employees,
or procurement of materials or supplies.
14. Hold Harmless. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits
including attorneys fees arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Contract, except for
injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence. of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Contract is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then,
in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property
caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of
the Contractor's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification
provided herein constitutes the Contractor's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51
RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the
parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Contract.
15. Insurance. The Contractor shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of this Contract,
Commercial General Liability Insurance written as an occurrence basis with limits no less than
$1,000,000 per occurrence for personal injury and property damage; and/or other insurance to
indemnify for the activities and services of this Contract.
The City shall be named as an additional insured, on a primary noncontributory basis, on the
Commercial Liability Insurance Policy with respect to work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor.
The Contractor shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy except upon forty-five
(45) days (RCW 48.18.290) prior written notice to the City. The City reserves the right to receive a
certified copy of all required insurance policies. A Certificate of Insurance evidencing the Contractor's
insurance coverage shall be delivered to the City before executing this Contract.
Contract -Small Works.FCS.CRPark Page 2 of 7
16. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor and all of the Contractor's employees shall perform the
services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances,
17. Renton Business License. Prior to signing the Contract, the Contractor agrees to purchase a City of
Renton Business License and maintain the license in full force and effect throughout the work of the
project. The license may be purchased from the Finance Department located in the City of Renton
Municipal Building, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA.
18. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between contractor proposals and this Contract, the
City of Renton contract shall prevail.
19. Termination. Prior to the execution of the Term, this Contract may be terminated without cause by
either party, subject to a 30-day written notice of termination. The termination notice must specify the
grievance and cause of termination, which must relate directly to a failure to meet specific contract
provisions. The notice shall allow the other party a minimum of seven (7) days to remedy the
grievance.
20. Exhibits to the Contract. The following exhibits are attached to this Contract and incorporated herein
by this reference:
Exhibit A — Scope of Work & Bond to the City of Renton
Insurance Information Forms
This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above.
CONTRACTOR
4 ,
Signature
CITY OF RENTON
Signature
Gerado Gonzalez Dennis Law, Mayor
Printed Name and Title Printed Name and Title
Farrow Concrete Specialists, Inc.
Business Name
1423 East 29 Street
Mailing Address Attest
_Tacoma Washington 98404
city State Zip Printed Name and Title
425-931-7003
Telephone
Contract -Small Works.FCS.CRPark Page 3 of 7
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Concrete Walkway Removal and Replacement Project
Additional requirements may be requested by the City of Renton after project start-up.
It is the responsibility of the contractor to notify the City of any additional requirements
before performing such work and associated costs.
Location of Project
Cedar River Park
1717 Maple Valley Highway
Renton, WA 98057
Existing asphalt pathways along park drives and parking lots — approximately 4,000
square feet removal and replacement with a broom -finished surface.
General Work Requirements
1. The contractor is responsible for ensuring its employees and subcontractors
follow proper safe working procedures for the industry.
2. All site conditions must be fully restored to pre-existing conditions at project
completion.. Examples of this include, re -sodding where turf has been damaged
or removed, form trenches are backfilled to match grades, damaged curbing
replaced as a result of the work and other repairs directly related to demolition,
site work and damages caused to perform the work. Required repairs shall be at
the direction of the City.
3. Construction fencing shall be provided by the contractor to protect the public
from accessing the construction site at all times. Fencing to be in -place prior to
beginning work.
4. All debris shall be cleaned and removed from the site at the conclusion of each
work day, when possible. This includes construction materials as well as
personal debris such as litter and other debris.
5. Damages and repairs to park property or park patrons' property (e.g.
automobiles). shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor to pay for and
repair to the satisfaction of the City.
6. Contractor shall have on -file a current City of Renton Business License and must
complete a Vendor Set-up Form if new to working in the City of Renton.
7. Contractor shall submit the required insurance coverage information and must be
approved by the City before beginning work under this contract.
8. Contractor is responsible for contacting affected utilities for locating utilities prior
to beginning work.
9. Schedule work so that exposed areas can be completed in one day so sites do
not remain exposed for more than one day, whenever possible.
OaCedar Ri%w PwkSJdewalk.Contract&Scope Page 4 of 7
Specific Requirements
1. Provide separate proposal for each area: the pool parking lot and the ballfield
parking lot are the two locations.
2. Construction fencing shall be placed around trees and shrubs at the direction of
the City for the purpose of protecting vegetation from construction activities.
Coarse bark is required installed at a one -foot depth when work areas, drive
routes, equipment and supply storage occur near trees or within their root zones
and placed at the direction of the City.
3. Staging areas shall be reviewed with the City prior to beginning any work under
this contract.
4. Remove all existing pavement as specified. Dispose of all construction debris at
an appropriate facility. Recycling debris is highly encouraged.
5. Prepare sites with minimal disturbance. Use narrow forms and narrow
equipment to reduce the demolition and installation "footprint."
6. Clean exposed pathways of all debris such as large stones, tree roots and other
objects. Cleanly cut tree roots prior to installing forms.
7. Level all areas to receive base course. Add 4-inches of 5/8-inch crushed base
unless instructed otherwise by the City. Compact base thoroughly.
8. Install 1/2-inch diameter rebar reinforcement to formed areas, 18 inches on -
center, wired at intersections and suspended on chairs. Tie-in rebar to existing
slabs by drilling into existing concrete a minimum of 1-inch and suspended at
least 1-inch above grade or at the same height as suspension -chairs.
9. Concrete shall be placed so that the final thickness is 4 inches unless instructed
otherwise by the City (e.g. 6-inches near trees). See attached thickened -edge
sidewalk detail. Use a Portland cement suitable for sidewalks that carry small
vehicle loads (3,000 psi or greater) and finished with a medium broom -finish
perpendicular to the direction of travel. All concrete shall form to match existing
joints without displacement of abutting edges.
10. Contractor shall cover all concrete poured in one day with enough plastic to
cover all surfaces, in the case of rain.
11. Contractor is responsible for protecting poured concrete from damage. Damaged
concrete shall be removed and re -poured at the contractor's expense.
12. Concrete forms shall provide the best support strength for holding concrete and
ensuring straight edges for finished surfaces. Reinforce forms using metal stakes.
Concrete walk with uneven edges shall be removed and replaced.
13. All finished grades shall precisely match adjoining surfaces without deviation
unless otherwise approved by the City. This includes non -concrete surfaces such
as drain grates or catch basins and the like.
14. All cut or formed control joints shall match the same pattern used for removed
concrete or similar to other existing concrete unless otherwise specified by the
City. Use 1/2-inch felt expansion material where new concrete abuts existing
concrete.
15. Apply an approved concrete sealer to all new surfaces prior to completion of all
site work.
Wedar River ParkSidewalk.Contraci&Scope Page 5 of 7
Oct, 09 08 102-56 Darmy. Farrow
Farrow Concrete Specialties, Ino.
20521 [Amd Ndromy B
sugitur, WA M90
2$�461-8702
c3ly or pmtm
1055 S Glady, Way
RMIUM Wa "035
2b3-722-5821 p.3
Ess ttlit m a, te
Me
atim ate
WI v2m;
i
Cchr Riva Puk.
Rme. TbtW
RCMYC OPPIOX2610 scat avhax
t6V*ft At*d TeAn-le 1= mos
to FvWd frc- fissures domw odd 5)s =Sbw Tc4k MKW and
rcpcqr -Wib tromu firish ma rW }der xim, radar &*zcm
landwW bWs
Wudcs; CGD=K FMM comps fbc's'ifs 3pmfiWs{ Cu6m mck,
mwl� sea, layft� tolvow
ammyc appruc Im sf0f mpW
a
C pry /[C j�{� _Y INSURANCE__'
TOM C As�IE 0 MUTED A-
I i 1 a � + Yf ems, Y? E0 i RfQR'mrs
2.'Owsm 12 St:6t' NO7iklQ
P � O - DaX 1727
sGtluaA wx 0942
Farr 000=0to ApecLailties.,
1216 r I&I.ISfest, at& #a
nooma.
_ R4 MSR C4rk"ER�t:
to —fist Y
VPOM TWECERTOWAE
rARM, MTEND Oft
' BY TM POUNS Mmv.
NWM
'T1l t�dx nr w ,f q i Q i.+tiEC rY2r€s'as
Fet:'1E-`3-gax*M 47MMGFK4FiY�ktY�$G49&�R's,�f��EGT'r4vs�t<�tl'���{fiTEt� P6t�5rS= � era.�a_=,��►�:�r-�Rr,�.t�st��rz�+�s�������►r�s
�1.!�F!&.f"mk�'B :�Tt8yG4Sbl u�N Irs�°� �e�'�1'Inxl! CfidlxlS..
T CS' ftE� i '1�nRitliizri' lt4 T*
pimamtosuw
X'-t4ttty S}c140�t� o�/jq� Q6:/8�0�c
QAM,WXV
,etaezt+x,cei +s ;,fiDdiOii#.
�ka9`�i.c� unaurr
t if : tar�an� 21:004,90 06/21./ge wg3 f fl
X ! f�at:�"xi��es4f11is �2C:�.r Rerista i �.
CPAthrr rticb
3� VWX 4
rr
dt�atawusaRReuy,t�rt��{�ry
9 ]SLR Cu" Ulm
AL
�+� A3Y`gi�"rs}Hid@LPAE�fi�P�if��C4341�i�8�dliP74r�
lt�ra€r #bR1' �(1�6i�Ma�att4k�i�YaT#+rB�i6hi��1&lffts3i�
--H& s go,
7 f 7
a
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: CED
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact...... Arneta Henninger X7298
Subject:
Langley Meadows Final Plat
File No.: LUA 08-056FP (Preliminary Plat LUA 06-
087)
Exhibits:
Resolution and legal description
Staff report and Recommendation March 3, 2009
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required...
Amount Budgeted.......
Total Project Budget
N/A
For Agenda of. March 16, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent..............X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence.. Ordinance......
Resolution ............ X
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept ......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Transfer/Amendment.......
Revenue Generated.........
City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
This final plat subdivides 11.16 acres into 70 single family residential lots with water, sewer,
storm and streets. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the City of Renton will be met
prior to recording the plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Langley Meadows Final Plat, LUA 08-056FP, with the following conditions and
adopt the resolution.
1. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff
prior to the recording of the plat.
2. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording the plat.
L
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (LANGLEY MEADOWS FINAL PLAT; FILE
NO. LUA-08-056FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain
tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
been duly approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Department of Community and
Economic Development has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the
approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The final plat approved by the Department of Community and
Economic Development pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
RESOLUTION NO.
(The property, consisting of approximately 11.16 acres, is located in the vicinity
of Hoquiam Avenue NE and NE 61h Street..)
is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and
subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Department of Community and
Economic Development dated March 3, 2009.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES:1404:3/9/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
2009.
2
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL A:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE RUNNING FROM A POINT 270
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, TO A POINT 300 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION SET FORTH IN JUDGEMENT ENTERED MARCH 19, 1992, UNDER
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 90-2-00038-9.
PARCEL B:
PARCEL A OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE NORTH 102 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER
RECORDING NO. 3076763.
PARCEL D:
THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 347794, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARC'FI F-
THE NORTH ONE-THIRD OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE SOUTH 80 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763, FOR 142ND AVENUE SOUTHEAST.
PARCEL F:
PARCEL B OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
RECOMMENDATION:
Langley Meadows LLC
Langley Meadows Final Plat
(Preliminary Plat LUA 06-087PP)
File: LUA 08-056FP
NE 7th St, NE 6th St, Hoquiam Ave NE,
Ilwaco Ave NE and Ilwaco PI NE all in
Section 10, Twp. 23 N. Rng. 5 E.
Final Plat for 70 single family residential lots
with water, sewer, storm, streets and lighting.
Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
2
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The applicant, Langley Meadows, filed a request for approval of a 70 lot Final Plat.
The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a
Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated on December 11, 2006 for the subject proposal.
The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
The subject site is located at NE 7th St, NE 6th St, Hoquiam Ave NE, Ilwaco Ave NE and
Ilwaco P1 NE. The new plat is located in Section 10, Twp. 23 N. Rng. 5 E.
The subject site is an 11.16 acre parcel.
The Preliminary Plat received City of Renton Council approval on March 19, 2007.
The property is located within the R-8 Zoning.
The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The Preliminary Plats were subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental
review and plat review.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report
prepared by Icicle Creek Engineers, dated May 3, 2006, including limiting earthwork to
the drier summer months, from April through October.
The Construction was in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotech
together with weekly site visits by the Civil Engineer overseeing the erosion control
methods.
2. The applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
(TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual, and
provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction
permits. This plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services
Division.
The erosion control plans were reviewed and approved by the City of Renton as part
of the construction plans.
The applicant shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to
meet both detention (conservation flow control) and water quality (basic) improvements.
The final approved construction plans were designed per the 2005 King County
Drainage Manual.
4. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained on the Preliminary
Technical Information Report prepared by Site Development Associates, LLC, dated May
30, 2006.
The final TIR was prepared and approved by the City of Renton as part of the
construction plans adhering to the 2005 Manual as stated above.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of '$488.00
per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
This fee has been paid.
6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each
new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the recording of the final plat.
This fee has been paid.
7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new
single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
This fee has been paid.
11. In addition, the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Preliminary
Plat.
The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non -Significance
— Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on December 13,
2006.
The project has complied with the conditions of ERC — see above.
LANGLEYMEADO W SFP. DOC/
2. The applicant shall demolish or remove all existing houses and accessory structures, except
the house and sheds remaining on Lot 4, prior to recording of the final plat.
All existing structures have been removed from the project site except the house
remaining on lot 4.
3. The 26 ft. wide access easement from Hoquiam Avenue NE serving Lots I through 4 shall be
placed in an access tract owned and maintained by all lots using it.
The access road off Hoquiam for these four -lots has been constructed to 26' easement
with 20' pavement section.
4. The applicant shall have "No Parking" signage posted along the 26 foot wide private road
prior to final plat approval.
The no -parking signs will be installed prior to final plat recording.
S. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be established for the
development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common
improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the
agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for
utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the
Development Services project manager.
The HOA and CC&R's have been submitted to the City Attorney's office for review
and have been approved as to legal form.
6. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Service Division project
manager for review and approval at the time of application for utility construction permits.
The revised landscape plan shall show the required 5-foot wide landscape strip along all
street frontages, including the internal residential streets. .
A final revised Landscape Plan has been submitted to the City for approval. Once
approved, the landscaping along Hoquiam Ave NE will be installed.
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and
therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
1) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior
to the recording of the plat.
2) All fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
SUBMITTED THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2009
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIbA
LANGLEYM EADO W S FP. DOC/
CITY HALL
LANGLEY MEADOWS
NW 1 /4, SE 1 /4, SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
�-�- ----fi---_-�--�- --�--
_WEST EIS OF R BOARD- -
FENCE 16 ON PROPERTY I PLAT OF WEDCEWOOD LANE
EAST END OF 6' BCARD
UNE' FENCE IS 1.5' NORTH
2 3 a8820'18"W VOL, 241. PCS. 29-39 OF BOUNDARY CORNER.
rso-01 6 e 9 10
N. LINE OF THE SEI/4, NWI/4, SE1/4, SEC. 10-23-5
6' BOARD FENCE ONI PROPERTY LINE.
^I of 5 6 7 8 9� 10 11 1 i 13 14
N 8 '20W NE 6TH ST. 61
u CB 8]'S0 181.02-HER
h I AD L �BJ\O�O
Z �0. r l J.
�m w
W: EIT48 54 67 44 1 43
V�j f N 89'48W
I wI N
68 66 2, 21
Z I 70 69 �; 45 42
Ia w
LL iI 65 m 4-6 'q 41
ICrI I
Q IN N 88.20 35W 70.06
6 4 1 j` 47 I 40
SEE SHEET 6 OF 7I
4 I 39
� �� 28.694 sR. 0 HDD6E r-� O= 48
6 3 q. g � J 38
8.85'
1
INJ Btl"20'35' W I, G.70''�I
N BB'20'35" W ^ ' ' 18.33'
- - 16, 72' _ 50 1 3 7
10' PRIVATE DRAINAGE 5 6
EASEMENT. SEE EASEMENT
PRONSON/NOTE 4, HFEi
I 12. 2 3 6 51 1 36
^I 0 -
FOUND 5/8" R/C 'B.R.kH' 6 1 I ^
13;
1 ,y643a 0.02' S h 0.15' E OF ^
p� CALC'EO PCS. (3/17/06)1 1 5 2 - 3 5
COI N 88'20'35' W 150.0051,
WIRE FENCE 0-- 6 o It. D 5 3 IOU
V=I PROPERTY LINE. 34
P
n U 59 I 21' 21' I -tA T 54 I 33
WIRE FENCE D.6' EAST 58 5 5
OF BOUNDARY LINE. 32
I IF- z
I
TgD 57
UNpLpT ORE FENCE 0.5' NOR 561 31
OF BOUNDARY LINE.
Imo_ 1fl0.Q¢' _
_ 128.30' N 8820'35• W 2.DB' e
N. LINE NF. 1/4, SW I/4, SE I/d, SEC. 10-23-5 N 8820'35 W c C �/
S 1/d COR SEC 10-23-5E: - - - - - - - - - --150.05_ -NL V T/ 7 ST _
FOUND 3" BRASS SURFACE FOUND 5/8- R/C -B.R.&H- FOUND 4'X4 CONC, MON W/ 1-3/4-
MONUMENT W/ PUNCH FOUND 1-i/2 BRASS 16434 0.43' S h 0.30' E OF BRASS DISC W/ PUNCH, STAMPED 'LS
STAMPED 10/15. (3/27/06) SVRFAGE MONUMENT W/ CALC'ED POS. (3/17/06)
10 PUNCH. (3/27/O6) / /D6
) I j37555" IN A CASE 0.11' S k 0.19' E
660.64' _ N OO•I O�S9� E OF CALC'ED POS. (3/17/O6)
660.64' 2.49' ',Z 22 4
(BASIS OF BEARINGS) N 88'21'09' W 2642.56' - -
60 0 60 120 180
EQUIPMENT PROCEDURES
A 5- ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION WAS USED FOR THIS FIELD
TRAVERSE SURVEY. ACCURACY MEETS OR EXCEEDS W.A.C.
Scale 1" = 60' 332-130-090.
MERIDIAN y.�o bFRvidso
PLAT OF MORGAN PLACE AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 205. PAGE 70 UNE TABLE ��Y1, S�Tp
UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2nO6O5229000D7. LINE I LENGTH BEARING USA aN
LEGEND LI 23.05 N BB'2035' W
L7 25.01 N S7V0'27' W
• SET 1/2' % N FEAR WITH 1 2434 PLASTIC CAP STAMPED
"MEAD CILMAN k ASSOCIATES 31434/35145/368t 1' CURVE TABLE o'• 35145 4
SET 4' x 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 1 5/8 BRASS DISC CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA fs�0W4L$LAN S��
WITH •X• STAMPED '35145. IN STANDARD RING COUNTY C2 5.71 50.00 6'32'42-
CASE. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) C3 5.66 50.DO 6'30'33' LEXPIRM
C4 17.41 50.00 IB'56'54' • .
OA 10' UPLTY EASEMENT, SEE EASEMENT PROVISIONS, SHEET 2. C5 17. 11 50.00 19'56'54
S.A.T. SENSITIVE AREA TRACT C6 61.83 40.00 88-33'50' TDB NO. D8D71
C7 48.84 100.00 27-59'02'
ce 25,71 50.00 29'27'38' SHEET 3 OF 7
1
21' 1 21'
zo
21 1 21'
15
WN
17
18
19
20
21
22=
23
24
25
26
27
28
WIRE FENCE.-
C��
I LUA-06-087-FPI
LND-10-0452
I
I
^I
D
FOU� 4'%4' CONC. MDN W/
2- BRASS DISC AND
PUNCH 0.34' S d: 0,21' E OF
CALC'EO POS. (3/17/06)
N
why
m ;
3 � I
I
FOUND 1/2 R/C 'TRIAD' 0.32'
S k 0.17' E OF CALC'ED POS.
(3n7/DI>
I
ti
a I
N
�y� I
FOUND t/2' I 1A1
0.32 Sh 0.17'E OF
CALLED POS. (3/17/06)
J
SE COR $EC 12-23-5E:
FOUND 1-,/2" BRASS SURFACE
MON, W/ PUNCH. CITY OF RENTON
CONTROL POINT 1852. (3/27/06)
132
Ir't2 11
Dd 15 14
L61' al
1 b W' W iCµi
00� � .19 C 0,
N �N 807"� 6j �
CITY OF RENTON CONTROL
MONUMENT 1851. NOT MISTED,
Mead Gilman & Assoc.
Professional Land Surveyors
P.O. BOX 289, WOODINVILLE, WA 98072
PHONE: (425) 486-1252 FAX: (425) 486-6108
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL A:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE RUNNING FROM A POINT 270
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, TO A POINT 300 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION SET FORTH IN JUDGEMENT ENTERED MARCH 19, 1992, UNDER
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 90-2-00038-9.
PARCEL B:
PARCEL A OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE NORTH 102 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER
RECORDING NO. 3076763.
PARCEL D:
THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 347794, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARCEL E:
THE NORTH ONE-THIRD OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE SOUTH 80 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763, FOR 142ND AVENUE SOUTHEAST.
PARCEL F:
PARCEL B OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
17,7
G
- q: r
Submitting Data: Department of Community and
For Agenda of: March 16, 2009
Economic Development
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with
Correspondence..
City of Renton code for new short plats and
the
Ordinance .............
Doyea Short Plat (LUA08-020).
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Deed of Dedication
Study Sessions......
Exhibit Map
Vicinity Map
Information.........
Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision
Recommended Action:
Approvals:
Council concur
Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other. .... ..
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required...
Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted.......
Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget
City Share Total Project.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The area to be dedicated for street improvements is
approximately 1,045 sq. ft. used to widen NE
51h Place at Hoquiam Ave NE. along the property's
southern boundary. This dedication is to
comply with City of Renton code for new short plats
and the Doyea Short Plat (LUA08-020).
Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the
short plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the
Deed of Dedication.
I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2009\Doyea SHPL 04m AGNBILL.doc
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055-3232
DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number:
Project File #: ! O . 00 �, Street Intersection: ^ v
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page )
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as
named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. This dedication is
required as a condition for development of property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand andseal the day and year as written below.
Approved and Accepted By:
Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton
Mayor
City Clerk
INDIVIDUAL FORM.OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary Seal must be within box signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires:
Dated:
DEED.DOC
Page I
EXHIBIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY:
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 67 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE
EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3065639;
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HEREIN DESCRIBED
PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 00°10'22" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE
THEREOF 6.00 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6.00 FEET NORTH, AS
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO, OF THE SOUTH LINE OF HEREIN
DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°20'44" EAST ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE 124.68 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.91 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 °28'20" TO THE EAST LINE OF HEREIN
DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE SOUTH 00°10'56" WEST ALONG SAID EAST
LINE 31.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HEREIN DESCRIBED
PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 88°20'44" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
THEREOF 150.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ifs IB
1
w
N
N
0
0
0
..
a
I JV.JJ
•880
N.E. 5TH PLACE
�7
JOB NO. 08162
30.01'
30' w
m
W
Z j
l W
w� >Q
� Q
o
o Q
o (�
z � �
C
�p
EXHIBIT
SCALE: 1 "=30'
CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA
C1 139.91 125.00 91'28'20"
SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
SHORT PLAT Clity of Renton
REPORT & Department of Community & Economic Development
DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST
REPORTDATE: April 30, 2008
Project Name: Doyea Short Plat
Owner: C. Thomas Foster, 6450 Southcenter Blvd Ste #106, Seattle, WA 98188
Applicant: C. Thomas Foster, 6450 Southcenter Blvd Ste #106, Seattle, WA 98188
Contact: Darrell Offe, Offe Engineers, PLLC, 13932 SE 159`h Place, Renton, WA 98059
File Number: LUA08-020, SHPL-A
Project Manager: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
Project Summary: The applicant, is requesting an administrative two lot short plat located within the
Residential - 8 (R-8) zoning designation. The subject site is a total of 14,678
square feet. The existing single-family residence is proposed to remain on what
would become new Lot 2. Proposed Lot 1 would be 5,501 square feet in area and
proposed Lot 2 would be 8,132 square feet in area. Access to the proposed lots
would be gained off of NE 5th Place via residential driveways. The applicant
proposes to remove the one tree that is onsite. There are no critical areas onsite.
Project Location: 553 Hoquiam Avenue NE
Project Location Map
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 2 of 10
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Owner(s) of Record:
2. Zoning Designation:
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation:
C. Thomas Foster
6450 Southeenter Blvd Ste #106
Seattle, WA 98188
Residential — du /ac (R-8)
Residential Single Family (RSF)
4. Existing Site Use: Existing single family residence to remain
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
North:
Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
East:
Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
South:
Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
West:
Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
6. Access:
Driveway access off of NE 5"' Place
7. Site Area:
14,678 square feet (0.337 acres)
C. H/STORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan N/A 4924 12/5/2001
Zoning N/A 5099 l l/l/2004
Annexation N/A 5100 l l/1/2004
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
a. Water: The project site is located in the Water District 90 service area
b. Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer within NE 5" Place.
c. Surface/Storm Water: There exist storm water conveyance systems within Hoquiam Ave NE
2. Streets: There is currently a paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
a. Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 3 of 10
b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan — General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
c. Section 4-7-150: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards
d. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards
5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
6. Chapter 11 Definitions
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element:
2. Community Design Element:
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Back2round
The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 0.337-acre (14,678 SF) parcel zoned Residential-8 (R-8)
dwelling units per acre into two lots. The property is located on the northwest corner of Hoquiam Ave
NE and NE 5`" Place. The existing single-fanuly residence will remain on proposed Lot 2.
Proposed lot sizes are as follows:
Lot 1: 5,501 square feet
Lot 2: 8,132 square feet
An approximate 1,045 square foot dedication would be required along NE 5"' Place. There is currently a
paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site. The proposal for two new lots
would arrive at a density of 6.41 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). There are no critical areas onsite.
Access to both proposed lots would be gained via separate private driveways from NE 5"' Place.
The topography of the site slopes from the north to the west, at an average slope of approximately 5
percent. The site is vegetated with grass and shrubs, as well as 1 evergreen tree proposed for removal.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
Not Applicable
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and
the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a short plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been
established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Designation
The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached development organized
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, L UA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 4 of 10
into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and
rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-
family living environments. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use
and Community Design Element policies:
Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per
acre in Residential Single Family Neighborhoods.
✓ Policy Objective met ❑ Not Met
Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in -fill parcels of less
than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500
square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The
minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide
flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range.
✓ Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be
sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive
fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
✓ Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy LU-1.54. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs
incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and
quality of life for existing residents.
✓ Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
✓ Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated R-8 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would
allow for the future construction of one new single-family dwelling unit.
Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a ininimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0
dwelling units per acre. After subtracting approximately 1,045 square feet along NE 5"' Place and
Hoquiam Avenue NE for right-of-way dedication, the net lot area is 0.31 acres. The proposal for
two lots on 0.31 acres arrives at a density of 6.41 dwelling units per acre, which falls within the
permitted density range for the R-8 zone.
Lot Dimension: As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for minimum lot
size, depth, and width.
Lot Size
5,000 SF minimum
Width
50 feet required
Depth
65 feet required
Lot 1
5,501 SF
60.02 feet
91.68 feet
Lot 2 (Corner)
8,132 SF
64.64 feet
91.68 feet
Setbacks: The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary
structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a street is 15
feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard is 20 feet. The
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, L UA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 5 of 10
proposed lots are oriented to such that their front yards would face south towards NE 5'h Place. The
existing house proposed to remain on Lot 1 would comply with the setback requirements for the R-8
zone. The setback requirements for proposed Lots 2 would be verified at the time of building permit
review.
Building Standards: The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 SF in size in the R-8 zone
is 35 percent or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. The existing residence proposed to remain on Lot 2
has a 1,200 square foot building footprint, which would result in a lot coverage of 15 percent on the
proposed 8,132 square foot lot. The lot coverage requirements for proposed Lots 2 would be
verified at the time of building permit review.
c) Community Assets
The site is vegetated primarily with shrubs, groundcover and one evergreen tree proposed for removal.
RMC 4-4-130 requires that thirty percent of the trees shall be retained in a residential development. If
the number of protected trees to be retained includes a fraction of a tree equal to or greater than 0.5 tree
then the number shall be rounded up. The applicant proposes to clear the site including the existing tree,
which would result in the retention of zero percent of the existing trees. However, the retention
requirement would have resulted in a fraction of a tree less than 0.5 tree. Therefore, the applicant will
not be required to replace the fraction of protected tree.
The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of-way.
The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non -arterial public street is 5 feet,
provided that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be
landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional area is available within the public right-
of-way due to required improvements, the 5-foot landscaped strip may be located within private property
abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant
vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two
ornamental trees,.a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), within
the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. Existing landscaping may be used to augment
the required landscaping.
A conceptual 'landscape plan was submitted with the application. The proposal includes the installation
of five feet of landscaping along NE 5`h Place and Hoquiam Ave NE and within the front yard of each of
the lots. Two new Raywood Ash trees are proposed to be planted on Lot 1 within the 15-foot front yard
setback. A Katsura and a Pink Flowering Dogwood along with ornamental shrubs (Rockrose, Viburnum)
ground cover (Kinnikinnick) are also proposed to be planted on Lot 1. Five new Raywood Ash trees are
proposed to be planted on Lot 2 within the 15-foot front yard setback. A Jacquemontil Birch and a
Japanese Snowbell, along with the same ornamental shrubs and ground cover, are also proposed to be
planted on Lot 2. The submitted conceptual landscape plan complies with the City's landscaping
requirements. A detailed landscape plan is required to be submitted as part of the Final Short Plat
application.
d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat.
There is currently a paved and improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the NE 5`f' Place.
The applicant is required to dedicate 6 feet in width along NE 51h Place (approximately 1,045 square
feet in area).
The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In
order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the
project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip
attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the existing residence) is expected to generate
approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at
$717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 lot = $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat.
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 6 of 10
All wire utilities. shall be installed underground per the City of Renton UnderGrounding Ordinance.
If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead
utilities shall be placed underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and
approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of
the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone and allows for
reasonable infill of developable land. Both lots are rectangular in shape. Lots 1 and 2 would front
NE 5"' Street. Both lots meet the requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width as
demonstrated in the table on page 4 of this report. Both lots appear to have sufficient building area
for the development of detached single-family residences.
e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way (NE 5°i Place) via single-family
residential driveways.
Topography: The topography of the site slopes to the west, at an average slope of approximately 5
percent. Due to the potential for erosion that could occur during construction activities, staff
recommends as a condition of approval that erosion control be required to comply with the
Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of
the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management Manual.
Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family
residences and are designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to existing
development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code,
which encourage residential infill development.
fi Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient .resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code
required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot
with credit given for the existing single-family residence, is recoinrmended in order to mitigate the
proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x
1 new lot = $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Street addresses shall be
visible from a public street.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per
single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat
would result in 0.44 additional students (0.44 X 1 lot = 0.44) to the local schools. It is anticipated
that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal
at the following schools: Maplewood Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School.
Storm Water: The runoff from the new lot must use infiltration per design by a professional
engineer, or be tight lined into the storm drainage system or other options as listed in, and in
accordance, with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Infiltration is allowed if the
soils are acceptable. If per the 1990 Manual the engineer of record detennines that detention is
required then the engineer shall use the 2005 Manual for sizing the detention facility.
The Surface Water System Development charges are required, and based on a rate of $1,012.00 per
new single-family lot (estimated total of $1,012.00 with credit for the existing lot). Payment of this
fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the
satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORTPLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL-A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 7 of 10
project. This includes installing a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed.
The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during
the construction of both off -site and on -site improvements as well as building construction. Due to
the potential for erosion to occur during project construction, staff recommends as a condition of
approval that the project be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater
Management Manual.
Water: The proposed development is located within the Water District 90 service area. The
applicant submitted a Certificate of Water Availability with the land use application. Water main
improvement plans shall be designed to City of Renton standards. The plans need to also be
submitted to the City of Renton for review.
All short plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow
requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. If the proposed
single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM
and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure.
Any existing hydrants to be counted towards the fire flow requirements shall be field verified. The
applicant will show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site.
Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if
not already in place.
Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Installation of individual side sewers by the developer is required prior to
recording the short plat; dual side sewers are not allowed. The minimum slope for side sewers is
2%. The subject property is served by City of Renton sewer service. There is an existing 8-inch
sanitary sewer main adjacent to the site, which will need to be extended to serve the new lots. This
project is located in the Honey Creek Special Assessment District (SAD 8611). "These fees are
$250.00 plus interest per new unit and shall be paid prior to issuance of a construction permit and
recording of the plat.
System Development Charges would be required and are based on the size of any and all domestic
water meters. Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permits,
and prior to recording the short plat.
H. FINDINGS:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for
short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the
official land use file.
2. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of
the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
3. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of
the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
4. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's
Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
S. Existing Land Uses: The short plat is consistent with development and uses surrounding the subject site,
including: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8);
South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8).
6. System Development Charges: Development Charges and a Sewer System Development Charges, at the
current applicable rates, will be required for the each new single-family residence as part of the
constriction permit.
SHPL Report 08-020
City ofRenton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL-A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 8 of 10
7. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the
new lot.
I. CONCL USIONS:
1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family comprehensive plan designation and
complies with the goals and policies established with this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the R-8 zoning designation and complies with the zoning and
development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval.
3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City
Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code,
provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein.
J. DECISION:
The Doyea Short Plat, File No. LUA08-020, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 edition of the Stormwater Management Manual.
2. The applicant shall pay a $488.00 Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the recording of the short plat.
3. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net average daily
trip prior to the recording of the short plat.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURE:
r,✓
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
413% 8
Decision Date
SHPL Report 08-020
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, L UA08-020, SHPL-A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 9 of 10
TRANSMITTED this 30'h day of April, 2008 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact:
Contact / Applicant: Darrell Offe
Offe Engineers, PLLC
Renton, WA 98059
Owner: C. Thomas Foster
6450 Southcenter Blvd Ste #106
Seattle, WA 98188
TRANSMITTED this 30V' day of April, 2008 to the Party (ies) of Record:
Kay Haynes
551 Elma Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
TRANSMITTED this 30" day of April, 2008 to the following.
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Fire Marshal
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager
Kayren Kittrick, Development Services
Jan Conklin, Development Services
Carrie Olson, Development Services
Renton Reporter
Land Use Action Appeals & Request for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14days of the
effective date of decision.
RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the effective date of decision, any party may request that a decision
on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator (Decision -maker). The Administrator (Decision -maker) may
modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he
finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator
(Decision -maker) finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of
the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal
timeframe.
APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing
Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on May 14, 2008. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-
day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City
of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall — 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be
filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055
South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
EXPIRATION DATE: The short plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. An extension
may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M.
SHPL Report 08-020.doc
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision
DOYEA SHORT PLAT, LUA08-020, SHPL A
Report of April 30, 2008 Page 10 of 10
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action.
Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning:
1. Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), shall be
planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots.
2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind
the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
Property Services:
1. To be sent under separate cover.
Fire:
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the
building square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500
GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the strictures. The applicant should note that the fire flow
available to the site is 1,000 GPM, therefore no residences over 3,600 SF in area can be permitted on the subject
site due to the limited fire flow available.
2. All building addresses shall be visible from, or posted at, the public street.
Plan Review - Sewer:
1. System Development Charges (SDC) are based on the size of any and all domestic water meters. These fees are
collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the short plat.
2. Separate sewer stubs are required for each new lot prior to recording of the short plat.
3. This project is located in the Honey Creek Special Assessment District (SAD 8611). These fees are $250 plus
interest per new unit and shall be paid prior to issuance of a construction permit and recording of the plat.
4. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed.
Plan Review— Water:
1. Waternain improvement plans shall be designed to City of Renton standards. The plans, even though it is in Water
District 90, need to also be submitted to the City of Renton for review.
Plan Review — Surface Water:
l . The new lots will be required to provide conveyance to address the storm water runoff from the individual lots.
2. Roof drains shall be tightlined to the storm system whenever feasible.
3. The Surface Water SDC fees of $1012 per new single family house are required to be paid. These fees are
collected at the time a constriction permit is issued.
4. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.
Plan Review — Street/Transportation:
1. Per City of Renton code projects that are 2 to 4 residential units in size shall provide half pavement width plus
minimum of 10', curb, gutter and sidewalk on the project side. The project shall install a minimum 20' pavement
section to the arterial if not existing.
2. The west curb line on Hoquiam Ave NE abutting this plat shall be located 18 feet from the right-of-way centerline
to provide for an ultimate roadway face of curb to face of curb width of 36 feet.
3. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise
utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat.
4. Residential lots — All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights -of -way shall have minimum radius of
fifteen feet (15').
Miscellaneous:
1. Separate permits and fees for side sewer connections, water meters, and storm drainage connections are required.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities.
3. Proposed new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than four feet in height (from bottom of
footing to top of wall) will be require a separate building permit for structural review. A geotec}mical report is
required with the submittal.
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more
poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed
underground.
SHPL Report 08-020
- 3 T23N ME E 1/2
SE 113thl
SE 11 7th J
SE
I
-
r
53
EXHIBIT 1
F6 - 15 T23N ME E 1/2 Q Zoo 0
ZONING -- -- Renton dLty Limitor 1:4800 E6
P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
02/28/07 10 T23N ME E 1/2
5310
DEVELOPMENT PL kWWN
CITY OF RF `N
MAR 3.1 W
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. I NOTD
III:TING
Mpl SNpvN IN TN ll PNM LW4TIU.
AI'I'I :11 .1i".'I%II S cJ ecFwc vW DIG, t...........
z
So
z
Y
i3
z
orc
OW
K
I.
I
S 88'20'41" E 150.34'
L,,1
60.02' 90.32'
z
'rno
- 10' EASEMENT I10'
p007032 22001371 °
IW
z
g
d
G4 Z
Op
_
o
^ W
m
SOS :w
�pS 0. f3 m Ex. HOUSE Sp.
Q '
Ua 8
N
SSD�.S m TO REMAIN ,i,m --
Q
II u ,;z
O ..
15' UTILITY ;I II }50J5 I
O
-
_____ ____ _
_ RECg4267252
-__ R-25.0'
1.5 -
60.02' fi4.64"
I
1 �
3
-
S 88'20'45" E : 150.32'
WRIGT OF5Tri PAC[INC LAY
-
IlTaji
�1
_ TO BE DEDICATED
i
SHORT PLAT INFORMATION:
TOTAL AREA: 0.34 ACRES
PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS: 2
ZONING: R-8
R/W TO BE DEDICATED: 1.045 50. FEET
PROPOSED NET DENSITY: 6.4
'_EGAL DESCRIPTION:
:AST HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
HE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
)F THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
iECT10N 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY,
EXHIBIT 2 NXCEPTGTHE' NORTH 67 FEET
!OR
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF, CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY
"OR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 3065639.
OWNER:
CLINTON THOMAS FOSTER, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE
6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
SUITE 106
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188
SURVEYOR:
MEAD GILMAN & ASSOC.
17625 - 130TH AVENUE NE
SUITE 104
WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON 98072
ENGINEER:
OFFE ENGINEERS. PLLC
13932 SE 159th PLACE
RENTON. WASHINGTON 98058-7B32
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 0 30 M
oea.. ryrE aenonao�
pna., OF
C
\I
--� A
i m
C.�
HOQUTAM AVENUE NE
x
>�
s
F
s�
D
g I
l O
q
MIFY, MaTY & VAMFY
y q 1270 W r/01kL" wm+k. WA9W72
425-466-94'O
CVr
ezdONS
YEA SHORT PLATOFVf�EYlaxlscapeaduFect
LANDSCAPE PLAN
dR
I
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. I NOTC'
Z
go
U
�
Z
¢ N
Oa
2 ;
I
�o
i� t �
I 1
W
p O
F
ap a HOUSE
IO j
+�`
J
NE 5lH rLA;CC
_
I
�
�
�I EXHIBIT 4
A;'N I i, l,'l)I'• I I Fu,
DEVELOPMENT " ANNING
CITY OF' ON
MAR 3 a 2008
'=
LIATG
IT I�,
B OETERNINE THE EXACTVERTICAL AND
NOT SHOVN IN THEIR rRUPER LOCATIOI
CALL BEFOK — 010 1-BOY-.2A-SSSS
VJCVArrUAP
Z
g a
a W
WW W
h
GRAPHIC SCALE = LQ
o a
WF Q
O oaC
in
o
aa
EILOOMM MOM FOR AMMOVAL
Br mt.. ww 00120/20Y1
By, B.e.•
O11G NO.
Br ms..
Rr mar. OF
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Public Works Department
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface
Water Utility
Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248)
Steve Lee (ext. 7205)
Subject:
CAG-06-174, Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Consultant Agreement with R.W. Beck for the City of
Renton Storm and Surface Water Management Plan
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Addendum #2
AI #: L &
For Agenda of:
March 16, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $17,394.00 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $175,000.00 (2009) Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $175,000.00 (2009) City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Storm and Surface Water Management Plan (SSWMP) requires an addendum to CAG-6-174 to
update SSWMP information to include changes in the Surface Water Utility staffing, resources and
financial information due to the Benson Hill annexation and the approval of the NPDES Permit
compliance program approved in 2008. With the change in equipment and personnel in 2008 and
additional financial data, the SSWMP's existing conditions information needs to be updated in
order to establish various future conditions information. In addition, the SSWMP capital
improvement program needs to be revised to include the needs of the new annexation area.
The project is funded from the Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program (427/u065005)
with adequate Surface Water Utility CIP funds ($175,000) available to cover the increased
consultant costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement (CAG-06-174) with R.W. Beck,
in the amount of $17,394.00, to assist the City with additional scoped items due to the Benson Hill
annexations, the new NPDES program, and additional City budget data for the Storm and Surface
Water Management Plan and extend the contract duration through December 31, 2009.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-9999 SSWM Plan\1002-Consultant Confespondence\Scope of Work
Development\Addendum2\2009RW Beck-AgendaBilI-Addendum2.doc\S Up
Y
U;Ut
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 5, 2009
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerma6 inistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor
(ext. 7248)
Steve Lee, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7205)
SUBJECT: City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Management Plan
(CAG-06-174) Addendum No. 2
ISSUE:
Should'Council approve Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement
(CAG-06-174) with R.W. Beck for the Storm and Surface Water Management Plan project, in
the amount of $17,394.00, and extend the contract duration through December 31, 2009?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Consultant Agreement (CAG-06-174) with
R.W. Beck, in the amount of $17,394.00, to assist the City with additional scoped items due to
the Benson Hill annexation and additional 2008 City budget data for the Storm and Surface
Water Management Plan, and extend the contract duration through December 31, 2009.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The purpose of the Storm and Surface Water Management Plan (SSWMP) is to perform a
comprehensive examination of the City's Surface Water Utility program, in terms of state and
federal regulatory requirements, surface water management policies, engineering program needs,
operation and maintenance program needs, and capital improvement program needs. Once these
needs are identified, the SSWMP planning process will be used to determine a recommended
future program in these areas that are both affordable and sustainable. The SSWMP is intended
to identify the resources that are needed to solve existing problems and prevent future surface
water problems, and position the City to be in compliance with current and pending regulations.
Taking into account the increased demands on the Surface Water Utility, the SWWMP will also
be the basis for evaluating the financial resources and utility rates needed to meet the identified
program needs.
In 2008, the Benson Hill area was annexed into the City and required the Surface Water Utility
Maintenance Services Section to increase equipment and personnel. In addition, the new
Council\CAG 06-174 Add 2, SSWMP
March 5, 2009
Page 2 of 2
NPDES Phase II Permit Program was also approved in 2008 that changed staffing, equipment
and financial information. With the change in equipment and personnel in 2008 and additional
financial data, the SSWMP's existing conditions information needs to be updated in order to
establish the various future conditions information. In addition, the SSWMP capital
improvement program needs to be revised to include the needs of the new annexation area. This
addendum provides additional scope costs and a time extension for changes to the Surface Water
Utility Management Plan.
The original scoped fees totaled $248,726. The increased scope costs for the Storm and Surface
Water Management Plan project increases the total consultant costs to $266,120 with the
deliverable time extended to December 31, 2009. This project is funded from the Surface Water
Utility Capital Improvement Program budget (427/u065005) with adequate Surface Water Utility CIP
funds ($175,000) available to cover the increased consultant costs.
CONCLUSION:
This addendum is needed to update information in the SSWM Plan to include changes in
staffing, resources and financial information due to the Benson Hill annexation and the approval
of the NPDES Permit compliance program in 2008.
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
File
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-9999 SSWM Plan\l002-Consultant
Correspondence\Scope of Work Development\Addendum2\090220-Memo2-AddendumGreggAddtlScope.doc\SLtp
ADDENDUM NO.2
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES
for
City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Management Plan
CAG-06-174
This Addendum is made and entered into this, day of by and between the City of Renton,
hereinafter called the "City", and R.W. Beck, Inc., whose address is, 1001 Fourth Ave., Suite 2500, Seattle,
WA 98154-1004 hereinafter called the "Consultant".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City engaged the services of the consultant under Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG-
06-174, dated September 22, 2006 to provide consulting services necessary for the City of Renton Storm and
Surface Water Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, in 2007, the City and the Consultant entered into Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Consultant
Agreement CAG 06-174 to recognize that additional time was needed to complete the City of Renton Storm
and Surface Water Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to complete the work associated with the City of Renton Storm and Surface
Water Management Plan, and the City does not have sufficient qualified engineering employees to perform the
work within a reasonable time; and
WHEREAS, the City and consultant have determined that additional services are required, and such additional
work items and costs being shown in the attached CAG-06-174 Addendum No. 2, Exhibit "A" — Scope of
Work;
NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section VIII Extra Work of the Master Agreement CAG-06-174,
dated September 22, 2006, it is mutually agreed upon that Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG-06-174, is
amended to include the work and associated budget as follows:
1. The maximum amount payable for the additional work items defined in Exhibit "A" of this contract
addendum is $17,394, without prior authorized from the City.
2. The revised contract total payable for work on this contract addendum is increased from $248,726, to
$266,120 making a difference of $17,394.
3. The Time of Completion (Section V of the Master Agreement CAG-06-174, as modified by
Addendum No. 1) above referenced contract is extended to December 31, 2009.
All other provisions of Consultant Agreement CAG-06-174 dated September 22, 2006 shall apply to this
addendum.
EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 2 to CONSULTANT
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG-06-174 as of the day and year first
above written.
CONSULTANT /f
Signature Date
Type or, rint Name
Title
CITY OF RENTON
Denis Law, Mayor Date
Mayor
Attest, City Clerk Date
R:\Seattle\001159 RENTON, CITY OFA 1-00977-10000 Comprehensive Stormwater Plan\01-Project Management\contract\Addendum No. 2\SWMP
Addendum 2 022609.doc
City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Management Plan
Addendum No. 2
EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for this Addendum includes extending the contract duration as well
as shifting work efforts and adding new work. The following paragraphs describe the
Scope of Work.
Task 1 - Project Management
The original project schedule anticipated a 15-month project duration beginning in late
2006. The additional work included providing continued project management services
through December 2009.
Task 2 - Stakeholder Meetings
The remaining work under this task includes the following:
- 1 Project Design Team meeting
- 1 public meeting
- 1 City Council meeting
- 4 regular project team meetings (between City and Consultant Project Managers and
at time additional key staff). The budget for regular team meetings may alternatively
be used for meetings with the City Council Utilities Committee if desired by the City.
Task 3 - Data Review
Under the original scope and budget, the Consultant prepared preliminary written
descriptions and summary table of surface water problems. The City will update the
summary table to include new problems identified, correct some inconsistencies, and
add problems associated with Annexations. Upon completion of the summary table,
the Consultant will update the problem/solution section of the report in a complete
revised draft form for City review. Upon City review of the Chapter, Beck will
incorporate another set of City review comments.
Task 4 - Review Policies, Ordinances, and Regulations
No changes to Scope of Work
Task 5 - Existing Program Assessment
Under the original scope and budget, the Consultant prepared an existing program
assessment based on 2006 conditions. Under this Addendum, the Consultant will
revise the existing program assessment to reflect 2008 conditions.
Page 1 of 3
Addendum No. 2
Exhibit "A" — Scope of Work
Task 6 — GIS Assistance
The City will complete remaining work items under this task, including all report
figures. Under this Addendum, the scope of work is modified to acknowledge that the
Consultant's work is complete.
Task 7 — Future Program Needs
The Consultant will revise its previously completed work under the original scope and
budget to incorporate new potential annexation areas.
Task g — Financial Analysis
No changes to Scope of Work
Task 9 — Recommended Program
No changes to Scope of Work
Task 10 — SSWM Plan Report Preparation
The Consultant a Review Draft SSWM Plan Report. Under this Addendum,
consulting will resubmit a revised Review Draft to incorporate the new work.
Task 11 —1-405 Coordination
Under this Addendum, the scope of work is reduced and it is assumed that the City
will prepare an outline of text regarding WSDOT-coordinated projects and that
Consultant will modify this outline into a report section.
BUDGET
Task 1
The budget for this task will be increased by $6,862 to complete the additional work
described above.
Task 2
The budget for this task will be reduced by $8,810.
Task 3
The budget for this task will be increased by $5,879.
Task 4
The budget for this task will be increased by $118.
Task 5
The budget for this task will be increased by $9,639.
Task 6
The budget for this task will be reduced by $6,396.
Page 2 of 3
Addendum No. 2
Exhibit "A" — Scope of Work
Task 7
The budget for this task will be increased by $3,990.
Task 8
The budget for this task will be reduced by $2,442.
Task 9
The budget for this task will be increased by $829.
Task 10
The budget for this task will be increased by $19,403.
Task 11
The budget for this task will be reduced by $11,677.
Summary of Addendum No. 2 and Revised Project Budget
Task
Original
Addendum
Revised
No.
Task
Budget
No.2
Budget
1
Project Management
$15,859
$6,862
$22,721
2
Stakeholder Meetings
41,557
($8,810)
32,747
3
Data Review
23,584
5,879
29,463
4
Review Policies, Ordinances and Regs
16,209
118
16,327
5
Existing Program Assessment
17,610
9,639
27,249
6
GIS Assistance
7,572
(6,396)
1,176
7
Future Program Needs
60,562
3,990
64,552
8
Financial Analysis
15,397
(2,442)
12,955
9
Recommended Program
5,488
829
6,317
10
SSWM Plan Report Production
32,511
19,403
51,914
11
1-405 Coordination
12,376
(11,677)
699
Total
$248,726
$17,394
$266,120
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL e
Al #: to ,
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. Public Works/Utility Systems
Staff Contact...... Dave Christensen, x7212
Subject:
Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and
Updates/Geodatabase Development, Phase II
Annual Consultant Agreement with Roth Hill
Engineering
Exhibits:
Annual Consultant Agreement
For Agenda of.
March 16, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
0
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $113,500 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $125,000 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $1.50,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates/Geodatabase Development, Phase II project
will allow the Wastewater Utility to complete the conversion of our sewer model into our current
model software of Mike Urban and allow us to bring all of our data into our new geodatabase.
This phase takes the work completed as part of Phase 1, which established processes for
completing the necessary tasks, and allows the rest of the sewer data to be converted.
Roth Hill Engineering was selected from the approved 2009 Utility Systems Annual Consultant
Roster to perform this work. There is sufficient funding for this contract in the 2009 Capital
Improvement Program budget (line item 426/u45140).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Annual Consultant Agreement with Roth Hill
Engineering, in the amount of $113,500, for the Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and
Updates/Geodatabase Development, Phase II project.
H:\File Sys\WWP - Was teWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondence - Waste water\DaveC\2009 Correspondence\Sanitary Sewer Model Roth Hill Contract
AB.doc\DMCtp
ENGINEERING
ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this , day of , 2009, by and between
the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE
"CITY," and ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS, LLC whose address is 2600 116°i Avenue NE, #100,
Bellevue, WA 98004, at which services will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT."
PROJECT NAME: Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates / Geodatabase Development, Phase 2
WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a
reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance
of a qualified professional consulting fine to do the necessary engineering services for the project, and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full
compliance with the statutes of the state of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid
corporate certificate from the state of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and
that all personnel to be assigned to the services required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the
services to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified
personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to perform the services set forth in the Agreement upon the
terns and conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the teens, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein 'below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally
trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the services described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services,
which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
The Consultant shall perfornn all services described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and
amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies.
The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass
judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the services. The Consultant shall snake such minor
changes, amendments, or revisions in the detail of the services as may be required by the City. This item does not
constitute an "Extra Services" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement.
The services deliverables shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will
be held responsible for the accuracy of the services deliverables, even though accepted by the City.
II
DESIGN CRITERIA
The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the services needed. Reports and plans, to the extent
feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations,
guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following:
F90015\00002.001 NiMenn 4270KA'hase 2 Scope and BudgeOAnnual Consultant Acreement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase Ph2.doe
Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA),
"Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton
Standard Specification.
2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction."
3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual."
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges."
Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual, Volumes 1 and 2."
6. Washington State Department of "Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic
analysis as described in item 14.
7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline."
Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual."
9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways."
10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual."
11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines."
12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all
cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be
used as they pertain.
13. Metro Transit, design criteria.
14. King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3, 4,
and 5.
15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets."
III
ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT
BY THE CITY
The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the
preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned services.
All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with
other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for
this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Services. City will provide to Consultant
all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the
accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the infonnation provided by the City. Should field studies be needed, the
Consultant will perform such services to the extent provided for in the Scope of Services. The City will not be
obligated to perform any such field studies.
17:10013\00002.001T,iMemt 627052'Thase 2 Scope and Budget',.Annual Consultant Agreement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase Ph2.doc
IV
OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND
DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT
Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the services covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the
Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the project. All such material, including working
documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain
the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not
directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any
liability whatsoever to the Consultant.
All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing -arrow
symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be
printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible.
V
TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
The services detailed in the Scope of Services will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of
Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's
services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to
factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin services under the terms of this
Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, the Consultant is delayed in
the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay
and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to
the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically
described as otherwise herein.
Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion
of the services may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party.
VI
PAYMENT
The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed services rendered under this Agreement as provided
hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Schedule of Hourly Rates. Such payment shall be full compensation for
services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
services. All billings for compensation for services performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days
and/or hours) and dates during which the services were performed. Payment for these services shall not exceed
$113,500 without a written amendment to this contract, agreed to and signed by both parties.
1. Payment.
Billing Rates. Payment for the CONSULTANT's services shall be at the
CONSULTANT's stated billing rate, which includes base compensation and indirect overhead
costs. The standard billing rate of individual personnel assigned to CITY projects shall be
calculated as a direct multiplication of the assignee's base compensation rate or hourly
equivalent, factored by the CONSULTANT's standard fee multiplier. The CONSULTANT
may review and modify the fee multiplier once per year. The CONSULTANT may review and
modify the base compensation rate of individuals in employment of the CONSULTANT once
per year. The schedule of billing rates is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C.
FA015,00002.001\PgMetrn=270S20me 2-Scope and Budeet\Annual Consultant Aereement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase PhIcloc
b. Reimbursable Expenses. Direct Expenses such as mileage, computer station time and certain
equipment shall be charged according to the standard schedule of direct reimbursable expenses
attached to this Agreement as part of Exhibit C. The CONSULTANT may update the expense
schedule two (2) times per year.
C. Invoice Format. The CONSULTANT's invoices shall itemize the hours and fees in a format
mutually agreed upon.
d. Payment Due. Invoices shall be submitted by the CONSULTANT monthly, are due upon
presentation and shall be considered past due if not paid within thirty (30) calendar days of the
due date. The CITY will inform the CONSULTANT of the standard monthly invoice submittal
schedule that will facilitate the CITY's timely payment of invoices.
e. Interest. If payment in full is not received by the CONSULTANT within thirty (30) calendar
days of the due date, invoices shall bear interest at one -and -one-half (1.5) percent of the PAST
DUE amount per month, which shall be calculated from the invoice due date. Payment
thereafter shall be first applied to accrued interest and then to the unpaid principal.
Payment for extra services performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing
at the time extra services are authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA SERVICES").
A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include
discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay.
To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employee
interviews.
Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to
this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in
writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however,
be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with
respect to such claims.
The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years
after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing
upon, these records. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention
period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been
resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment.
VII
CHANGES IN SERVICES
The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed service deliverables of this Agreement as
are necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional
compensation.
Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed services or parts
thereof revised, the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. These
services shall be considered as Extra Services and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII.
r:\001 i100002.001 \1'Ijt\1CInt=27032Thase 2 Scope and Budget\Annual COnSldtant Aereemem_Dlodel Conversion and Geodatahase Ph2.doc
VIII
EXTRA SERVICES
The City may desire to have the Consultant render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than
services provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Services. Such services will be considered as Extra
Services and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Services
under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether services are
Extra Services or services already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the services are
undertaken. Performance of the services by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any
claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Services.
IX
EMPLOYMENT
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award
or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any services required by the
Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any
and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so
engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part
of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the
sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant.
The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the
employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City.
If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical,
or clerical staff as a result of this project, the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement
and interview process.
X
NONDISCRIMINATION
The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services
because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational
qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer;
recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or tenninations; rates of pay or other forms of compensation;
selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non -
Discrimination provision, this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be
barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the
City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely.
F:\0015\00002.001\PdWnn 270ShPhase 2 Scope and Budeet\Annual Consultant .Aereement_Nlodel Conversion and Geodatabase Ph'- doe
XI
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days
written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with
subparagraphs C and D below.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory
personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the
services under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a
bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the
City so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving
members of the Consultant, with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment
shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section.
C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, other than for fault on the part of the Consultant,
the CONSULTANT shall be compensated for all services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred
prior to the receipt of notice of suspension. In addition, upon resumption of services, the CITY shall
compensate the CONSULTANT for expenses incurred as a result of the suspension and resumption of its
services, and the CONSULTANT's schedule and fees for the remainder of the services may be equitably
adjusted upon mutual agreement.
D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the
Consultant, the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid
shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in
performing the services to the date of termination, the extent of services originally required which was
satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether those services are in a. form or of a type which is
usable to the City at the time of termination, the cost to the City of employing another finn to complete
the services required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the
value to the City of the services performed at the time of tennination. Under no circumstances shall
payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set
forth in subsection C above had been applied.
E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the services, the original copies of all
Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become
the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of
this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
F. Payment for any part of the services by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies
of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for
failure of the Consultant to perform services required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under
the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future
act or omission by the Consultant.
XII
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with services not disposed of by agreement between the
Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/Building/Public Works or
his/her successors and delegates, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this
Agreement.
ha0015\0000_.001 \hjN42 n . 27082d`hase 2 Scope and BudpnAnnual Consultant AgiecmentModel COM el'SIOn and Geodambase Ph2.doc
In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this
Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, situated in King County.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS
The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services to be performed under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with
the laws of Washington.
The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and
shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part
from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall
require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based
upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by
or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees and (b) the City, its agents,
officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be
valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or
employees except as limited below.
The Consultant shall secure general liability, property damage, auto liability, and professional liability coverage in
the amount of $1.0 million, with a General Aggregate in the amount of $2 million, unless waived or reduced by the
City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance hlfornation Form, and the Standard
Accord Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton shall be named as an
"additional insured" on all contracts/projects. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of
relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and
Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration
page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification
Form will be required.
The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder.
All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City.
The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all
required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty-five days notice
shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy.
The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current
City of Renton business license while conducting services for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide
verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton
business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to
conducting activities in City might -of -way.
The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
Fa0015�00002.001\11ijN7emt rig 0SN'hase 2 Scope and Budget\Annual Consultant Agneement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase Ph2.doc 7
XIV
SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS
The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express consent
of the City.
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070.
XVI
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement.
No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable
for, any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment
to this Agreement.
The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof,
and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted.
XVII
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials
submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions
thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
C. SUL AN
Pat Nolan, E gineering Director Date
CITY OF RENTON
Denis Law, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk
F00l5,00002.00l �PgNlLnn =27082tPhase 2 Scope and BudgeMin ial Consultant Agreement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase Ph2.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 3229
CITY OF RENTON
SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3 2 2 9
It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to
ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to race, color, national origin, ethnic
background, gender, marital status, religion, age or disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably
accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory
treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines:
(1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related
activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and
separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job -related criteria which does not
discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources
decisions will be in accordance with individual perforniance, staffing requirements, governing
civil service rules, and labor contract agreements.
(2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will
cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair practices
and equal opportunity in employment.
(3) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN - The City of Renton Affirmative Action Plan and Equal
Employment Program will be maintained and administered to facilitate equitable
representation with the City work force and to assure equal employment opportunity to all. It
shall be the responsibility of elected officials, the Mayor, the Affirmative Action Officer,
department administrators, managers, supervisors, Contract Compliance Officers and all
employees to carry out the policies, guidelines and corrective measures set forth in the
Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program.
(4) CONTRACTORS" OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub -contractors, consultants and
suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fail"
Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and in the City's Affirmative
Action Plan and Equal Employment Program.
Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation
of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities.
CONCURRED IN by the City Council of the City of RENTON, Washington, this 7thday of October, 1996.
CITY OF RENTON:
Mayor
,Attest:
City Cler}
RENTON CITY COUNCIL:
Council President
1':\001550000'_.00]\Pi;iN4gmt g1708'_'%Phase 2 Scope and Budget\.Annual Consultant Agreement_Model Conversion and Geodat abase Ph=.doc 10
7
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS, LLC hereby confirms and declares that
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
I. It is ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS, LLC's policy to offer equal
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to
the race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or veteran status.
II. ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS, LLC complies with all applicable federal,
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment.
II. When applicable, ROTH HILL ENGINEERING PARTNERS, LLC will seek out and
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of
subcontracts.
Pat Nolan, Engineering Director
Print Agent/Represet tive's Name and Title
Agent/Repre ntative's Signature
Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier.
Include or attach this document(s) with the contract.
F:\001 j\00002.001\PriMemt 027082� Phase'_ Scope and Budeet\Annual Consultam Agreement_Model Conversion and Geodatabase Phldoc
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
City of Renton
Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates / Geodatabase Development
Phase 2
Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC
March 2009
The tasks under this Scope of Services are for Phase 2 of this project, which includes the
conversion of sewer system hydraulic model data for the remaining sewage basins and
updating the entire model to reflect the most current conditions for the City of Renton (City).
Sewer model data will be linked to the City's existing data, and imported to the City's Enterprise
Repository Geodatabase, which was developed during Phase 1 of this project. The consultant,
Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC is referred to as "Roth Hill" within this agreement. The
subconsultant, DHI Water & Environment, Inc. is referred to as "DHI" herein. The subconsultant
Port Madison GIS is referred to as "PMG" herein. Roth Hill will partner with DHI and PMG to
provide assistance with the proposed work.
More specifically, the proposed services are being provided to assist the City with the
conversion from DHI's MOUSE modeling software format to the GIS-based MIKE Urban format
for the calibrated 2001 Model and the Ultimate Model, both of which were developed by Roth
Hill in conjunction with the City's most recent Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update. This
conversion will enable the City to integrate the hydraulic modeling data with other GIS-based
datasets. The subject MOUSE data currently resides on the server at Roth Hill's office. Roth
Hill has the MIKE Urban Software in-house to process the MOUSE data.
This second phase of the project expands upon the single pilot sewer model basin that was
converted for testing purposes during the first phase. The model information for the remaining
basins will be extracted from the existing MOUSE model, imported to MIKE Urban, and verified
using confirmation measures. The data will then be added to the City's Enterprise Repository
Geodatabase. The procedures outlined in the report generated during Phase 1 of the project
will be implemented to complete the remaining model basins. The consulting team will assist
the City with population of the Geodatabase, and information transfers to and from MIKE Urban.
The Geodatabase will be the central location housing the City's sewer system infrastructure
data. Future uses of the Geodatabase will include system map development and coordination
with the Maintenance Management System (MMS) for Operations.
Phase 2 — Model Conversion, Model Updates, Geodatabase Updates
Task 1 — Model Conversion
1. Use selection query methods within the MOUSE software to extract the remaining model
basins and all associated relevant model data for the 2001 Model.
2. Use MIKE Urban import capabilities to generate a personal geodatabase, to store sewer
system data. Attributes in the MOUSE model will be properly mapped to the MIKE
P:\0015\00002.001\NjJ\1emt P27082\.Phase 2 Scope and Bkidcet\Model Conversion and Geodambase Ph2 Scope 022509.doc Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT A
City of Renton
Scope of Services — Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates
Urban geospatial datasets and tables during this process. Verify proper connectivity
with Model Basin 35, which was converted to MIKE Urban during Phase 1 of the project.
3. Attach and orient inflows and outfalls from the original MOUSE model.
4. Review and verify that MIKE Urban model data and results match information from the
Calibrated 2001 MOUSE Model.
a. Ensure no data was lost in the conversion by checking the model data for all
relevant model object types, such as nodes, links, boundary conditions, diurnal
patterns, etc.
b. Run both runoff and network simulations in the MIKE Urban model.
c. Compare the generated CRF (Catchment Result File) and PRF (PipeFlow Result
File) results in MIKE View, and verify that the results for each program are
consistent.
5. Research, identify, and correct any discrepancies.
6. Convert the Ultimate Model for the remaining sewer basins from MOUSE to MIKE Urban
using the steps identified above for the 2001 Model. The existing Ultimate Model was
created as part of the MOUSE Model development and represents the future sewer
service area with 2030 planning values, such as population and employment projections.
7. Run Ultimate Model in MIKE Urban and verify that results are consistent with Ultimate
MOUSE Model, per procedure identified for 2001 Model. Research, identify, and correct
any discrepancies.
8. Obtain technical assistance from DHI as needed during the conversion process.
TASK 2 — Model Updates
A precursor to this task is the City updating and populating the Geodatabase with new system
data through the end of 2008.
1. For the entire model, attach pipe and manhole data constructed after development of
the 2001 Model, working closely with City to add appropriate data. This data will be
attached under a separate scenario, to create the "Current," or 2008 Model. Re-route
and update system to account for changes since 2001, including lift stations.
Incorporate new system data through the end of 2008 from City. Run model to verify
successful operation. The pilot basin (Model Basin 35) has been updated with system
data through the end of 2006 during Phase 1, whereas the remainder of the model was
physically updated through the end of 2005 during the model development effort. The
2006 Pilot Model will be spliced with the remaining basins from the 2001 Model. The
physical updates from the 2005 Model will then be added to the system. Finally, the
data through the end of the year 2008 will be imported to the model. It should be noted
that in the future, model updates are anticipated to occur on a yearly basis, which will
reduce the level of effort required for each update as compared to the process involved
with this stage of the project.
2. Check new imported data to the model, to verify accuracy. This effort will include
viewing profiles in the model of all new piping, to visually check to ensure necessary
data has been imported and that pipe slopes and connectivity make sense in relation to
existing model data.
P:\0015\00002.00 I \piiMpi t 4'MS2TImse 2 Scope and Budget\\Model Conversion and Geodat abase Ph2 Scope 022509.doc Page 2 of 6
EXHIBIT A
City of Renton
Scope of Services — Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates
3. Assign sewage flows (dry and wet weather) to new portions of the Current (2008)
Model, based on assumptions described in Phase 1 report. The Pilot Basin portion of
the model will need to be updated from 2006 to 2008. The remainder (and majority) of
the model will require updated flow assignments for all of the system added since mid-
2002. Although the physical model through the end of 2005 was created previously, it
did not contain flow assignments. Flow assignment methodology will be as outlined in
the Phase 1 report.
4. DHI will provide a basic technical training session for eight hours on using the MIKE
Urban program for hydraulic modeling. The training is intended to teach up to three City
staff members the basic operational elements of the program. Work will include
preparation of the tailored training agenda and travel expenses. Training will occur after
the model has been updated to 2008, and is ready for use.
5. Obtain technical assistance from DHI as needed during the updating process.
TASK 3 — Geodatabase Updates
1. Following completion of the Current (2008) Model, Roth Hill will export MIKE Urban
collection system feature classes to ESRI shapefiles.
2. Spatially link MIKE Urban pipes (links) with pipes from City shapefiles. Perform visual
inspection to ensure identifiers have been correctly assigned. Roth Hill will perform this
task and correct any discrepancies. It is suggested that for newer portions of the system
not yet in the model (system constructed after 2005), the City could assign MIKE Urban
compatible identifiers to each of these pipes in the shapefiles or geodatabase, after
which this information could be brought into MIKE Urban to develop the Current (2008)
Model. This step would save time and efforts associated with linking the two data
sources together for pipes not yet represented in the model.
3. Make any edits necessary to the UML (Unified Modeling Language) and general
configuration of the Geodatabase (this would be done by DHI, since they created the
UML, and have the most knowledge to the interaction between the Geodatabase and the
MIKE Urban program). This would include fine-tuning procedures and methods for
designating what data in the Geodatabase represents modeling elements versus non -
modeling elements.
4. Provide technical assistance with managing the interface between the Geodatabase and
MIKE Urban (this will be provided by DHI).
TASK 4 — Geodatabase Assistance
1. Review Geodatabase work and population performed during Phase 1 of project. PMG
will become familiar with work done during Phase 1 of the project, and review the City's
efforts to date, to make sure the geodatabase is operating as intended, and that data is
being transferred back -and -forth correctly.
2. Work with City to develop a Geodatabase management plan. Plan will address how
data is maintained, access control, permissions for updating the Geodatabase, quality
control procedures, backup procedures data security plans. It is assumed that the PM
GIS will develop the management plan with input from and as part of a collaborative
effort with the City.
P:\0015\00002.001\PriML,,nt #27052\Phase 2 Scope and BudeerModd Conversion and Geodatabase Ph"_' Scope 022509.doc Page 3 of 6
EXHIBIT A
City of Renton
Scope of Services — Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates
3. Provide general advisory role, including limited quality control, in relation to UML
language work and MIKE Urban / Geodatabase interaction described under Task 3.
PMG will provide this role.
4. Provide technical assistance to the City with populating the Geodatabase. PMG will
provide assistance as needed for adding City shapefile data, and the MIKE Urban
Current (2008) Model collection data. PMG will provide technical assistance with using
the Geodatabase for map book production, as needed.
TASK 4 — Project Management
1. Implement/monitor the Project Plan, schedule and budget, and administer monthly
invoicing to City.
2. Prepare monthly status reports.
3. Manage staff and tasks and provide general project administration.
4. Procure and manage subconsultant services, including review of subconsultant invoices.
5. Project coordination and communication with the City, including kickoff meeting, internal
and external meetings (assumes three total external meetings) and project file
management.
PROJECT LIMITATIONS
This scope does not include software installation, including ArcSDE, Oracle, ArcServer, ArcGIS,
etc. This scope does not include database administration or development of software
programs. Additionally, this scope does not include the development or creation of additional
MIKE Urban modeling geodatabases or projects other than the 2001, Current (2008), and
Ultimate Models, as described within this scope. Only the Current (2008) Model data is
intended to be included with the Geodatabase. This project includes technical assistance with
the Geodatabase, but it is assumed that the City will actually populate the database.
P:\0015\00002.001\PrjMgnn #27082\Phase 2 Scope and BudgelNodel Conversion and Geodatabase 11112 Scope 022509.doc Page 4 of 6
EXHIBIT A
City of Renton
Scope of Services - Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates
R11n(:FT
Probable Project Costs
City of Renton
Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates / Geodatabase Development
PHASE 2
Total Labor Reimb. Total
Planned Planned Planned
Task Description Hours Bill Reimb. Cost
1.
Model Conversion (Roth Hill)
162
$18,709
$1,191
$19,900
2001 Model Conversion
68
2001 Model Testing/Verification
20
Ultimate Model Conversion
54
Ultimate Model Testing/Verification
20
DHI
24
$3,800
2.
Model Updates (Roth Hill)
264
$29,088
$2,012
$31,100
Update Physical Attributes/Mere
168
Flow Assignments
81
Training
15
DHI
60
$9,700
3.
Geodatabase Updates (Roth Hill)
140
$14,786
$814
$15,600
Align Sha efile Pipes w/ Model Pipes
92
Populate Geodatabase w/ City Data
18
Populate Geodatabase w/ MU Data
30
DHI
60
$8,500
4.
Geodatabase Assistance (PM GIS)
128
$11,800
Initial review of geodatabase
12
$1,100
Geodatabase management plan
40
$3,700
Advisory role relating to Task 3
16
$1,500
Geodatabase operational assistance
60
$5,500
5.
Project Management (Roth Hill)
50
$7,854
$446
$8,300
DHI
28
$4,800
Total Roth Hill Budget: $74,900
Total DHI Budget: $26,800
Total PM GIS Budget: $11,800
Overall Budget: $113,500
END EXHIBIT A
F:\0015`•.00002001\P{iMeml Scope and Budget\Model Conversion and Gcodatabase Ph2 Scope 022509.doc Page 5 of 6
EXHIBIT B .
Time Schedule of Completion
City of Renton
Sanitary Sewer Model Conversion and Updates / Geodatabase Development
Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC
March 2009
PHASE 2 - TIMELINE
Task
start
End
Sewer Model Conversion
32109
1214109
Project Management (0060)
312109
1214109
Model Conversion (0280)
32/09
611/09
2001 Model Conversion
3/2/09
3131/09
2001 Model TestingNer fication
411/09
4/15109
Ultimate Model Conversion
4/16/D9
5/15109
Ultimate Model TestingNerification
5118109
611/09
Model Updates (0281)
6/1/09
12/4109
Update Physical Attributes/Merge Models
611109
7131/09
Flow Assignments
813109
911109
Training
11116/09
12/4109
Geodatabase Updates (0283)
3/2/09
12/4/09
Align Shapefile Pipes with Model Pipes
312109
428/09
Populate Geodatabase with All City Data
3009
5/2amg
Populate Geodatabase with Mike Urban
911109
1029/09
Model Data
General Support
3/2109
12/4/D9
Geodatabase Assistance (0284)
3009
1214109
Initial Review
3/2/09
3131/09
Geodatabase Management Plan
911109
11/16/09
Advisory Role Relating to Task 3
411109
1029109
Geodatabase Operational Assistance
4/1109
1214109
Mar 09 1 Apr N I May 09 1 Jun 09 -1 Jul 09 I Aug 09 1 Sep 09 1 Oct 09 1 Nov 09 1 Dec 09
END EXHIBIT B
Fmo13\M2.01v6Nf 1R170-Ph.,25�,aande.dr—.ftiG•o---dG—.—Ph S,.,ms09.- Page 6 of
Schedule C
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC. fee schedule by staff and reimburseable expense classification
as of October 01, 2008. Rates are subject to modification.
Staff Time
Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate Range
EIT / Sr. Designer
$85.00
$113.00
Civil Specialist
$80.00
$151.00
Engineer
$141.00
$164.00
Project Manager
$154.00
- $166.00
Planner
$94.00
$120.00
Technician
$70.00
$73.00
CAD (includes mapping and GIS)
$96.00
$106.00
Construction Representative
$97.00
$109.00
Surveyor
$55.00
$103.00
Project Surveyor (PLS)
$125.00
$139.00
Administrative
$41.00
$86.00
Administrative Lead
$100.00
$149.00
Director / Principal / Sr. Engineering Consultant
$162.00
$194.00
Reimburseable Expenses
Travel
Vehicle Mileage
IRS Standard Rate
(currently $0.55)
Prints
Black & White Prints (up to 11x17)
$1.25
per sheet
Color Prints (up to 11x17)
$1.50
per sheet
Large Format Prints
$7.50
per sheet
CD Production
$2.00
per cd
Computer Station
$10.00
per hour
Map/Drawing Scanning
$5.00
per sheet
Field Equipment
Flo -Tote (flow monitoring)
$30.00
per day
Turbidimeter (water quality monitoring)
$5.00
per day
Survey - Digital Level
$5.00
per hour
Total Station
$10.00
per hour
Robotic Total Station
$15.00
per hour
GPS/RTK
$20.00
per hour
No charges are billed for the following items:
1. Long distance phone calls
2. Fax services
3. Postage
4. Photocopy paper or stationary for in-house production
5. In-house Photocopy - no "per copy" charge, but related labor is billed
S
r
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REGARDING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED EQUIPMENT AND
INSTALLATION RATES SET FORTH IN THE FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FORM 1205 FILED BY COMCAST
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2008.
WHEREAS, Section 623 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §
543, as amended, authorizes local franchising authorities, such as the City of Renton,
Washington (hereinafter the "City"), to regulate rates for equipment and installations; and
WHEREAS, the City is certified as a rate regulation authority pursuant to the rules of the
Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter "FCC"); and
WHEREAS, Comcast Cable Communications LLC (hereinafter "Comcast"), the local
franchise holder, filed with the City an FCC Form 1205 "Determining Regulated Equipment and
Installation Costs, `Equipment Form"', dated April 1, 2008, purporting to set forth and justify the
rates it .proposed to charge to subscribers for equipment and installations (hereinafter the "2008
FCC Form 1205"); and
WHEREAS, the City provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the
2008 FCC Form 1205; and
WHEREAS, the rates set forth herein will govern Comcast's equipment rates and
installation charges until Comcast lawfully implements a further rate change pursuant to
applicable FCC regulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. Comcast's maximum permitted rates and charges for equipment
and installation, as calculated in the 2008 FCC Form 1205, are neither approved nor denied, but
may function as a rate ceiling during the relevant rate period.
SECTION III. Comcast shall not charge any rates higher than the applicable
maximum permitted rates set in the 2008 FCC Form 1205, nor increase those rates, unless such
rates are first filed with and approved by the City, in accordance with applicable law and
regulations, including but not limited to the notice requirements imposed by 47 C.F.R. § 76.932,
or as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law and regulations.
SECTION IV. Comcast may charge rates less than the lawful maximum permitted
rates for equipment and installation, as long as such rates are applied in a uniform and
nondiscriminatory way, pursuant to applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The
City, however, shall not be deemed to have approved such rates.
SECTION V. This Resolution is based on the representations made by Comcast
in its 2008 FCC Form 1205. Should information come to the City's attention that these
representations were inaccurate in any material way; the City reserves the right to take
appropriate action. This Resolution is not to be construed as a finding that the City has accepted
as correct any specific entry, explanation, calculation or rate in the 2008 FCC Form 1205.
SECTION VI.
The City reserves all of its rights with respect to rate regulation,
including (but not limited to): (i) the right to request and review data, and documents concerning
the 2008 FCC From 1205 in order to determine the impact, if any, such data and documents have
on rates proposed in future equipment and installation rate filings; (ii) the right to address issues
raised in the 2008 FCC Form 1205 that are relevant to any City review of subsequent equipment
and installation rate filings; and (iii) the right to request additional information concerning the
2
e
RESOLUTION NO.
2008 FCC Form 1205 that is relevant to any City review of subsequent equipment and
installation rate filings.
SECTION VII. This Resolution constitutes a written decision for purposes of 47
C.F.R. § 76.936(a).
SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval
by the City.
SECTION VIX. This Resolution shall be released to the public and to Comcast, and
a public notice shall be published stating that this Resolution has been issued and is available for
review, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 76.936(b).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE S :140 0 : 2/ 19/09 : scr
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of 72009.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
f
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. T
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REGARDING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BASIC PROGRAMMING
SERVICE RATE SET FORTH IN THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION FORM 1240 FILED BY COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS LLC ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2008.
WHEREAS, Section 623 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §
543, as amended, authorizes local franchising authorities, such as the City of Renton,
Washington (hereinafter the "City"), to regulate rates for basic cable service; and
WHEREAS, the City is certified as a rate regulation authority pursuant to the rules of the
Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter "FCC"); and
WHEREAS, Comcast Cable Communications LLC (hereinafter "Comcast"), the local
franchise holder, filed with the City an FCC Form 1240 "Updating Maximum Permitted Rates
for Regulated Cable Services", on or about April 1, 2008, purporting to set forth and justify the
maximum rate it could charge to subscribers for basic cable service (hereinafter the "2008 FCC
Form 1240"); and
WHEREAS, the rate set forth herein will govern Comcast's basic service rate until
Comcast lawfully implements a further rate change pursuant to applicable FCC regulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. Comcast's maximum permitted rate for basic cable service, as
calculated in the 2008 FCC Form 1240, is neither approved nor denied, but may: (i) function as a
v
RESOLUTION NO.
basic service rate ceiling during the relevant rate period; and (ii) be utilized in future basic
service rate filings, to the extent permitted and consistent with FCC rules and decisions.
SECTION III. Comcast shall not charge any rate higher than the applicable
maximum permitted rate set forth in the 2008 FCC Form 1240, nor increase that rate, unless such
rate is first filed with and approved by the City, in accordance with applicable law and
regulations, including but not limited to the notice requirements imposed by 47 C.F.R. §
76.1603, or as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law and regulations.
SECTION IV. Comcast may charge rates less than the lawful maximum permitted
rates for basic service, as long as such rates are applied in a uniform and nondiscriminatory way,
pursuant to applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. The City, however, shall not
be deemed to have approved such rates.
SECTION V. This Resolution is based on the representations made by Comcast
in its 2008 FCC Form 1240. Should information come to the City's attention that these
representations were inaccurate in any material way; the City reserves the right to take
appropriate action. This Resolution is not to be construed as a finding that the City has accepted
as correct any specific entry, explanation, calculation or rate in the 2008 FCC Form 1240.
SECTION VI.
The City reserves all of its rights with respect to rate regulation,
including (but not limited to): (i) the right to request and review data and documents concerning
the 2008 FCC From 1240 in order to determine the impact, if any, such data and documents have
on rates proposed in future basic service rate filings; (ii) the right to address issues raised in the
2008 FCC Form 1240 that are relevant to any City review of subsequent basic service rate
filings; and (iii) the right to request additional information concerning the 2008 FCC Form 1240
that is relevant to any City review of subsequent basic service rate filings.
7
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION VII. This Resolution constitutes a written decision for purposes of 47
C.F.R. § 76.936(a).
SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its approval
by the City.
SECTION VIX. This Resolution shall be released to the public and to Comcast, and
a public notice shall be published stating that this Resolution has been issued and is available for
review, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 76.936(b).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES :1401:2/ 19/09: scr
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2009.
Denis Law, Mayor
Q
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (LANGLEY MEADOWS FINAL PLAT; FILE
NO. LUA-08-056FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain
tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
been duly approved by the Department of Community and Economic Development; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Department of Community and
Economic Development has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the
approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City. Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The final plat approved by the Department of Community and
Economic Development pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
RESOLUTION NO.
(The property, consisting of approximately 11.16 acres, is located in the vicinity
of Hoquiam Avenue NE and NE 6ch Street..)
is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and
subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Department of Community and
Economic Development dated March 3, 2009.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES:1404:3/9/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
2
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL A:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE RUNNING FROM A POINT 270
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, TO A POINT 300 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION SET FORTH IN JUDGEMENT ENTERED MARCH 19, 1992, UNDER
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 90-2-00038-9.
PARCEL B:
PARCEL A OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE NORTH 102 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER
RECORDING NO. 3076763.
PARCEL D:
THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 347794, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARCEL E:
THE NORTH ONE-THIRD OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON.
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE SOUTH 80 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3076763, FOR 142ND AVENUE SOUTHEAST.
PARCEL F:
PARCEL B OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-07-009-LLA,
RECORDED JUNE 26, 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070626900006, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
N 88'20'40" W
150.34'
—
—
30.01'—
EXHIBIT
W
30'
z
o
'�
co
rn
LD
w
�
w
D
°°
z
N
o
^
W
J
o
THIS PORTION HEREBY CONVEYED
W I Q
W
TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR
Q
z
ROAD PURPOSES.
`n
o
Q
Z
�
N
N 88'20'Ln
44" W 124.68'
G1
1�
z
D
6.00'
(o
1,044± S.F,
I O
o
150.33'
_
�o
—
---_— _ N 88'20'44" W 180.33'
_
N . E. 5TH PLACE
- -
SCALE: � "=30'
�'7
JOB NO. 08162
CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA
Cl 139.91 125.00 91'28'20"
SW1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
e
l
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT,
OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.
4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON," EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF
VALIDITY OF LAND USE AND SUBDIVISION APPROVALS.
WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Area has undergone a substantial tightening of credit for
development projects; and
WHEREAS, current employment forecasts point to a diminishing labor market in the
Puget Sound area with a corresponding loss of demand for office and commercial buildings and
residential construction; and
WHEREAS, the developers and City staff have invested substantial amounts of time in
land use and subdivision activities which result in various approvals; and
WHEREAS, loss of those various approvals would be detrimental to the City and the
general public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-1-080, Interpretation, of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended to add a new
subsection, F, to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.
F. EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF VALIDITY FOR LAND USE AND
SUBDIVISION APPROVALS:
The Planning Director (or his designee) is hereby authorized to extend the normal
period of validity that would otherwise apply for land use and subdivision
approvals that were valid on or after the effective date of this ordinance for an
additional two years beyond the standard expiration dates listed in RMC 4-8 and
RMC 4-9. This extension is in addition to any other extensions possible under
City Code. This extension does not apply to temporary use permits, building
permits, or public works permits. This provision shall automatically expire on
December 31, 2010, and shall be removed from the code at that time unless
another ordinance is passed extending this date. Where conflict exists with other
provisions, this subsection shall govern.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five (5) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Denis Law, Mayor
N
I11•
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.I 542:3/2/09:scr