HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 11/09/2009AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
November 9, 2009
Monday, 7 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PROCLAMATION: Renton Community Foundation Week - November 12 to 18, 2009
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District Impact Fees
b. Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation - 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for
approximately nine acres located at 13430 144th Ave. SE
c. Sierra Heights Elementary School Annexation - 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for
approximately 15 acres located at 9901 132nd Ave. SE
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the
Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the
record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
NOTICE to all participants: pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17.130, campaigning for any ballot
measure or candidate from the lectern during any portion of the council meeting, and particularly,
during the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/2/2009. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 10/22/2009 for CAG-09-157, 2009 Pump Station Electrical
Upgrades Project; 12 bids; engineer's estimate $150,000; and submits staff recommendation to
award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, EC Company, in the amount of $94,519.31.
Council concur.
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 11/3/2009 for CAG-09-173, 126th Ave. SE Utility Project; 24
bids; engineer's estimate $898,975.84; and submits staff recommendation to award the
contract to the low bidder, Rodarte Construction, Inc., in the amount of $452,789.07. Council
concur.
d. City Clerk reports receipt of a referendum petition filed on 10/19/2009 by John Pavlik regarding
the Honey Creek Estates Annexation and staff's recommendation to submit the annexation
measure to a vote of the people of the area by special election on 2/9/2010. Council concur.
(See 9.a. for resolution.)
e. City Clerk reports receipt of referendum petition filed on 10/27/2009 by John E. Buxton
regarding the Sunset East Annexation and staffs recommendation to submit the annexation
measure to a vote of the people of the area by special election on 2/9/2010. Council concur.
(See 9.b. for resolution.)
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
f. Community and Economic Development Department reports submission of 14 grant
applications for the 2009 Neighborhood Grant Program (second round), and of those
recommends funding of six projects and six newsletters in the total amount of $31,340. Refer
to Community Services Committee.
g. Development Services Division recommends amending RMC 4-4-10015 regarding A -Frame sign
permits to allow continued use of the signs after paying the initial permit fee and discontinuing
annual renewal fees. Refer to Planning and Development Committee.
h. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of a consolidated fee
schedule and establishment of fees for 2010. Refer to Finance Committee.
i. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Springbrook Ridge Preliminary
Planned Urban Development and Preliminary Plat, a mixed -use development including office,
retail, and residential units located at SE 172nd St. and Benson Rd. S. Council concur. (See 9.a.
for ordinance.)
j. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with MySlik, Inc. in the
amount of $26,280 to purchase a Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine to assist in keeping the
Airport runway free of accumulated ice. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
k. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-07-141, Hazen 565-Zone Reservoir Construction, and
requests approval of the project, final pay estimate in the amount of $2,190, commencement of
a 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $251,047.98 to T. Bailey, Inc.,
contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topic may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; RiverRock Concession Lease Renewal; King County Medic One
Lease Addendum; Renton Gateway Center Utilities Project Interfund Loan*; Heaven Race
Ministries Fee Waiver Request
b. Planning & Development Committee: 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Title IV
(Development Regulations) Docket*
c. Utilities Committee: 2010 Utility Rates*
9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Calling for annexation by election of the Honey Creek Estates area (See 7.d.)
b. Calling for annexation by election of the Sunset East area (See 7.e.)
c. Renton Gateway Center utility project interfund loan (See 8.a.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Approving the Springbrook Ridge Preliminary Planned Urban Development (See 7.i.)
b. 2009 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (#M-01, #T-02, #T-04, #T-05) (See 8.b.)
c. Rezone of certain properties (Sunset Bluff) to CO and IL zoning (#M-03) (See 8.b.)
d. Rezone of certain properties (Valley View Mobile Home Park and Summerfield subdivision) to R-
8 zoning (#M-04) (See 8.b.)
e. Rezone of certain properties (Sunset Hills) to R-8 zoning (#M-05) (See 8.b.)
f. Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket #T-05, allow increased density in the COR zone (See
8.b.)
g. 2010 piped utilities rates (See 8.c.)
h. 2010 solid waste rates (See 8.c.)
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
11. AUDIENCE COMMENT
12. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 9, 2009
Canceled
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11 AM & 9 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9 AM & 7 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1 PM & 9 PM
City of ,Y o
N
PUBLIC HEARING
ADOPTION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEES FOR ISSAQUAH, KENT, AND RENTON SCHOOL
DISTRICTS
November 9, 2009
The proposed amendment would authorize the City of Renton to collect a $3,344 impact fee for
all new single-family homes built within the boundaries of the Issaquah School District in the
Renton city limits. Currently, the City of Renton collects a fee of $5,495 for each new single-
family home.
The proposed amendment would authorize the City to collect a $5,394 impact fee for all new
single-family homes, and a $3,322 impact fee for each new multi -family dwelling unit, built
within the boundaries of the Kent School District in the Renton city limits. Currently, the City of
Renton collects a $5,304 fee on behalf of the Kent School District for new single-family homes
and a $3,266 fee for each new multi -family unit.
The proposed amendment would authorize the City to collect a $6,310 impact fee for all new
single-family homes, and a $1,258 impact fee for each new multi -family dwelling unit, built
within the boundaries of the Renton School District in the Renton city limits. This represents
the collection of a new fee by the City of Renton. In the past, the Renton School District has
had adequate capacity to absorb growth within existing facilities. Estimates from the Renton
School District's most recent Capital Facilities Plan, however, show that there is a need for an
impact fee to mitigate the costs of growth in the District.
A school district impact fee is the amount of money that a jurisdiction collects from each newly
constructed dwelling unit to offset the costs of growth in the local school district. The school
district impact fee is collected so that developers of new construction pay a one-time fee to
share in the costs of growth. Impact fees are only charged to new development; existing
homes (or remodels of existing homes) are not subject to the fee. Jurisdictions pass the
collected fees on to the school district, which applies the money toward the rehabilitation and
expansion of existing facilities, and the construction of new facilities to serve the growing
population. School districts request jurisdictions to collect a set fee based on a Capital Facilities
Plan, which contains a prioritized list of construction and rehabilitation projects that the district
plans to undertake. Impact fee money is tracked, and if it is not used to offset the costs of
growth within six years, it must be returned unless an extension to ten years is requested.
Each of the three School Districts has proposed to make major capital improvements to schools
that would benefit current, or future, Renton residents. City staff recommends adopting the
requested impact fees for 2010.
ANNEXATION & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX
November 9, 2009
The City is in receipt of a 60% Direct Petition from the Renton School District Board of
Directors representing the Renton School District for the proposed Maplewood Heights
Elementary School Annexation area. Under RCW 28A.335.110 the board of directors for
school districts are authorized to sign an annexation petition when the school district
property is the only property in the annexation area. The King County Department of
Assessments certified the signatures on the petition on September 29, 2009.
The approximately 9-acre potential annexation area is located in the City's Potential
Annexation Area near the eastern portion of the City limits. It is bounded by the existing
City limits to the north, east, and west. Maplewood Park and Southeast 136th Street are
to the south of the annexation area.
The area is currently designated with the King County Comprehensive Plan designation
of Urban Residential Medium 4 — 12 dwelling units per acre. The existing King County
zoning in the area is R-4, which is a residential zone where schools are permitted. The
City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designation for the area is Residential Low Density
(RLD). The area was pre -zoned with City of Renton R-4 zoning, which is also a residential
zone that where schools are permitted, as part of the East Renton Plateau Prezone in
2007 (Ordinance #5254). The Renton zoning would become upon annexation.
Council is holding this Public Hearing in order to give affected parties the opportunity to
comment about the proposed annexation, as well as about the proposed zoning. Also at
this meeting, Council will decide whether it wishes to accept the 60% Direct Petition to
annex and whether or not it will authorize the Administration to forward a Notice of
Intent to Annex package to the Boundary Review Board for King County to begin their
mandatory 45-day review.
Department of Cohimunityr
& Economic Development
''%'`•`�-' AnPh.,ORsch,Adnirkcratac
A&,ana Jatm;an, Phairgrq Technician
May 19, :!tld9. N
150 3?F
or-eea
1.3,2m
,f C4z%;,DF R e^t nif Cd 2ic{: ai..
> "i T,,.:i ,.'1^y:
Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation
vicinity Map
(._J City Limits : School Site
4.m] School Annexation Boundary � parks
SIA
ANNEXATION & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF
SIERRA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX
November 9, 2009
The City is in receipt of a 60% Direct Petition from the Renton School District Board of
Directors representing the Renton School District for the proposed Sierra Heights
Elementary School Annexation area. Under RCW 28A.335.110 the board of directors for
school districts are authorized to sign an annexation petition when the school district
property is the only property in the annexation area. The King County Department of
Assessments certified the signatures on the petition on September 29, 2009.
The approximately 15-acre potential annexation area is located in the City's Potential
Annexation Area near the eastern portion of the City limits. It is bounded by the existing
City limits to the north, east, and south. Sierra Heights Park is immediately to the west
of the annexation area and 132"d Avenue Southeast is immediately to the east.
The area is currently designated with the King County Comprehensive Plan designation
of Urban Residential Medium 4 — 12 dwelling units per acre. The existing King County
zoning in the area is R-6, which is a residential zone where schools are permitted. The
City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designation for the area is Residential Low Density
(RLD.). The City of Renton is proposing Renton R-4, which is also a residential zone that
where schools are permitted. The Renton zoning would become upon annexation.
Council is holding this Public Hearing in order to give affected parties the opportunity to
comment about the proposed annexation, as well as about the proposed zoning. Also at
this meeting, Council will decide whether it wishes to accept the 60% Direct Petition to
annex and whether or not it will authorize the Administration to forward a Notice of
Intent to Annex package to the Boundary Review Board for King County to begin their
mandatory 45-day review.
\
®J
±
900
\\
&
/ k
m
(\
_
R \
m
§&
�a3
$m
)>
00
/ 0
\\
t§23
§/
!
] 2
\\(
a
\
\ �
CO
m
�
-Ul
rim
_
L I
o @
=r
�
� q
�
\
\\
�
0.3
rn
_
§
_
x
�
/av
@
\}
w
k
� k
d
m
\
�
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact......
Executive/City Clerk
Bonnie Walton
Subject:
Bid opening on October 22, 2009, for CAG-09-157, 2009
Pump Station Electrical Upgrades Project
Exhibits:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tabulation Sheet (12 bids)
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Al #: -1,6.
For Agenda of:
November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept.....
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $94,519.31 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $150,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $150,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the
following two criteria: There was more than one bid and the low bid was within the project
budget. An irregularity was found that does not give an advantage to any of the bidders and is
requested to be waived. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the lowest responsible bid
submitted by EC Company in the amount of $94,519.31.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low responsible bid submitted by EC Company $94,519.31.
X
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT cicyof
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF RENTON
DATE: November 3, 2009 NOV 0 4 2009
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk RECEiVEO
.�;�,TY CIFR.K'� OFF?C.t:
FROM: Tom Malphrus, Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7313)
SUBJECT: Bid Opening for Water Utility Project WTR-27-3458
At 2:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 22, 2009, the City of Renton held the bid opening for
the Water Utility's 2009 Pump Station Electrical Upgrades project. The City received 12
bids, the City Clerk publicly opened and read all twelve bids in Conference Room 511,
Renton City Hall.
EC Company of Portland Oregon submitted the apparent low bid in the amount of
$84,116.81. The engineer's estimate for this project is $150,000.00.
On October 26, 2009, Gary Harper Construction, Inc. (GHC) submitted a protest of the
bid results. GHC noted that the Measurement and Payment Section of the project
specifications required all bidders to bid $10,000.00 for Bid Item No. 7 on the Schedule
of Prices. GHC further noted that EC Company had only bid $500.00 for Bid Item No. 7.
In response to GHC's protest the Water Utility checked the bids and found that nine of
the twelve bidders did not bid the required $10,000.00 for Bid Item No. 7. The Water
Utility adjusted all bids by placing $10,000.00 in Bid Item No. 7 and recalculating the bid
amounts. EC Company remained the lowest bidder with an adjusted bid amount of
$94,519.31. The Water Utility sent the protest, the bids and the adjusted bids to the
City Attorney for legal review. The City Attorney determined that an irregularity was
present, however EC Company received no advantage by the irregularity, therefore the
City can waive the irregularity and award the bid to EC Company. Attached for your
reference is a copy of my e-mail correspondence with the City Attorney.
In accordance with Council procedure, the low bid meets all three conditions for award:
1. The low bid must be within the total project budget.
2. There must be more than one bidder.
3. The lowest responsive, responsible bid contains no significant irregularities.
The Water Utility recommends that Council award the contract to EC Company, in the
total amount of $94,519.31 at it's meeting of November 9, 2009.
Ms. Walton, City Clerk
November 3, 2009
Page 2 of 2
The total project budget for this project is $150,000.00. The Water Utility has budgeted
sufficient funds to complete this project in its 2009 Capital Improvement Program
Budget, account no. 425.000000.018.5950.0034.63.000000.u55582
If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this bid, please
contact me.
Attachments
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-3458 - Replace
Transformers\BidPeriod\CityClerk-BidAwa rd.doc\TMtp
2009 Pump Station Electrical Upgrades - Bid Summary Revision 1
City of Renton
Bid Opening: October 22, 2009
Engineers
EC Company
Mastercraft
DMT Electric
Kelly Electric
Totem Electric
High Mountain
Fuller Electric
Gary Harper
Seahurst
Green River
Omega
Northwest
Estimate
Electric, Inc
Electric
Construction
Electric
Construction
Contractors
Electrical
Bid Item
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
No.
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
I Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
001
$2,600.00
$2,000.00
$1,200.00
$1,400.00
$920.00
$500.00
$500.00
$490.08
$7,100.00
$1,119.00
$5,670.00
$1,000.00
$6,500.00
002
$16,900.00
$7,100.00
$8,500.00
$8,500.00
$8,280.00
$9,300.00
$17,051.00
$4,563.20
$9,000.00
$10,074.00
$12,500.00
$12.000.00
$4,500.00
003
$5,600.00
$2,500.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$2,861.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$1.922.12
$550.00
$2,437.00
$2,770.00
$1,000.00
$4,500.00
004
$53,600.00
$17,980.00
$14,700.00
$22,100.00
$25,751.00
$24,350.00
$21,512.00
$17,897.12
$19,000.00
$21,942.00
$26,800.00
$42,000.00
$50,500.00
005
$6,000.00
$3,500,00
$5,500.00
$6,400.00
$4,913.00
$1,500.00
$500.00
$6,904.90
$1,300.00
$6,872.00
$4,070.00
$1,000.00
$6,300.00
006
$50,300.00
$43,239.00
$51,000.00
$36,100.00
$44,221.00
$53,500.00
$51,124.00
$64,292.57
$51,000.00
$61,849.00
$45,800.00
$53,000.00
$50,500.00
007
$2,000.00
$500.00
$500.00
$10,000.00
$2,608.00
$500.00
$500.00
$234.00
$10,000.00
$1,250.00
$10,000.00
$840.00
$1,500.00
Subtotal
$137.000.00
$76,819.00
$83,400.00
$88,500.00
$89,554.00
$90,650.00
$91,687.00
$96,303.99
$97,950.00
$105,543.00
$107,610.00
$110,840.00
$124,300.00
Tax
$13,015.00
$7,297.81
$7,923.00
$8,407.50
$8,507.63
$8,611.75
$8,710.27
$9,148.88
$9,305.25
$10.026.59
$10,222.95
$10,529.80
$11,808.50
Total
$150,015.00
$84,116.81
$91,323.00
1 $96,907.50
$98,061.63
$99,261.75
$100,397.27
1 $105,452.87
$107,255.25
$115,569.59
$117,832.95
$121,369.80
$136,108.50
Bid Summary with Bid Item No. 7 revised to $10,000
Engineers
EC Company
Mastercraft
DMT Electric
Kelly Electric
Totem Electric
High Mountain
Fuller Electric
Gary Harper
Seahurst
Green River
Omega
Northwest
Estimate
Electric, Inc
Electric
Construction
Electric
Construction
Contractors
Electrical
Bid Item
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
No.
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
001
$2,600.00
$2,000.00
$1,200.00
$1,400.00
$920.00
$500.00
$500.00
$490.08
$7,100.00
$1,119.00
$5,670.00
$1,000.00
$6,500.00
002
$16.900.00
$7,100.00
$8,500.00
$8,500.00
$8,280.00
$9,300.00
$17,051.00
$4,563.20
$9,000.00
$10,074.00
$12,500.00
$12,000.00
$4,500.00
003
$5,600.00
$2.500.00
$2.000.00
$4,000.00
$2,861.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$1,922.12
$550.00
$2,437.00
$2,770.00
$1,000.00
$4,500.00
004
$53,600.00
$17,980.00
$14,700.00
$22,100.00
$25,751.00
$24,350.00
$21,512.00
$17,897.12
$19,000.00
$21,942.00
$26,800.00
$42,000.00
$50,500.00
005
$6,000.00
$3,500.00
$5,500.00
$6,400.00
$4,913.00
$1.500.00
$500.00
$6,904.90
$1,300.00
$6,872.00
$4,070.00
$1,000.00
$6,300.00
006
$50,300.00
$43,239.00
$51,000.00
$36,100.00
$44,221.00
$53,500.00
$51,124.00
$64,292.57
$51,000.00
$61,849.00
$45,800.00
$53,000.00
$50,500.00
007
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
Subtotal
$145,000.00
$86,319.00
$92,900.00
$88,50
$96,946.00
$100,150.00
$101,187.00
$106,069.99
$97,950.00
$114,293.00
$107,610.00
$120,000.00
$132,800.00
$13,775.00
$8,
$8,825.50
,750
$9,209.87
$9,514.25
$9
$10,076
9,3
$10,857.84
$10,222.95
$11,400.00
$12,616.00Tax
Total
$158,775.00
1 $94,519.31
$101,725.50
1 $96,907.50
$106,155.87
1 $109,664.25
1 $110,799.77
1 $116,146.64
$107,255.25
$125,150.84
1 $117,832.95
$131,400.00
$145,416.00
Thomas H. Malphrus
From:
Larry Warren
Sent:
Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:03 AM
To:
Thomas H. Malphrus; Mark Barber
Cc:
Teresa Phelan; Lys L. Hornsby; Abdoul Gafour
Subject:
RE: Irregular Bid
EC Company can either withdraw its bid as mistaken or agree to abide by the specifications and accept $10,000 as the
as -built line item. The test is whether or not the irregularity gives an advantage, which it does not. They are still low. And
everyone is stuck with $10,000 for this item. I don't see this irregularity as being material so I believe that the city can
waive it.
Please note my email address has changed to Iwarren@rentonwa.gov
From: Thomas H. Malphrus
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:46 PM
To: Mark Barber; Larry Warren
Cc: Teresa Phelan; Lys L. Hornsby; Abdoul Gafour
Subject: Irregular Bid
Mark, Larry:
On Thursday, October 22, the City Clerk opened bids for the Water Utility's 2009 Pump Station Electrical Upgrades
project. The low bidder is EC Company with a bid of $84,116.81. Today, I received a fax from Gary Harper Construction,
Inc (GHC). GHC is protesting the bid based on the fact that the Measurement and Payment section of the Technical
Specifications states that the price for Bid Item No. 7 of the bid schedule will be $10,000. Of the twelve bidders who
submitted bids only three bid $10,000 for Bid item No. 7. The remaining nine bidders bid a lower value, including EC
Company which bid $500.
It was not the intention of the Water Utility to require bidders to bid $10,000 for Bid Item No. 7. This requirement was
accidently carried over from a previous project.
Attached is a bid summary which shows the original bids and the bids revised by changing Bid Item No. 7 to $10,000.
Please note that the bid order changes in some places (second and third for example) but the lowest bidder remains EC
Company with a bid of $94,519.31.
The Water Utility would like to award the bid to EC Company.
Question: May we proceed and award the bid to EC Company? If we may award the bid to EC Company, which amount
should be the award amount, the original bid ($84,116.81) or the revised bid ($94,519.31)? Obviously we'd like to award
the project to EC Company for the lower amount but we will understand if this is not an option.
For your reference, I've attached a copy of the Measurement and Payment section of the Technical Specifications (see
Bid Item No. 7).
Thank you for your assistance.
Thomas Malphrus, P.E.
City of Renton,
Department of Public Works
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: 2009 Pump Station Electrical Upgrades; CAG-09-157
DATE: October 22, 2009
Page 1
FORMS
Proposal
BID
BIDDER
& Triple
Bid
L&I
Adden
Sched.
subcontractor
"Includes
Sales Tax
Form
Bond
Cert
1-3
of Prices
list
DMT Electric
P.O. Box 2303
X
Cashier's
X
X
X
X
$96,907.50
Yelm, WA 98597
check
Don Taylor
EC Company
3104 "C" St. NE, Suite 200
X
X
X
X
X
X
$94-116.81
Auburn, WA 98001
$94,519.31
James A. Bock
Fuller Electric
37107 12th Av S
X
X
X
X
X
$102,022-.25
Federal Way, WA 98003
$116,146.64
'atricia A. Fuller
Gary Harper Construction, Inc.
14831223rd St SE
X
X
X
X
X
X
$107,255.25
Snohomish, WA 98296
Gary A. Harper
Green River Construction, Inc.
6402 S. 144th St, Suite #1
X
X
X
X
X
X
c' ^^�-w
Tukwila, WA 98168
$117,832.95
Jerry Knudsen
High Mountain Electric, Inc.
19105 124th Av NE
X
X
X
X
X
c'^^�.()G
Kirkland, WA 98034
$110,799.77
Ron Van Allen
Kelly Electic
35336 SE Center St.
X
X
X
X
X
X
$_98,062.80
Snoqualmie, WA 98065
$106,155.87
John L. Beer
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: 2009 Pump Station Electrical Upgrades; CAG-09-157
DATE: October 22, 2009
Page 2
FORMS
Proposal
BID
BIDDER
& Triple
Bid
L&I
Adden
Sched.
subcontractor
**Includes
Sales Tax
Form
Bond
Cert
1-3
of Prices
list
Mastercraft Electric, Inc.
19717 62nd Av S, Suite #D-110
X
X
X
X
X
$91,323.00
Kent, WA 98032
$101,725.50
Chad Walior
Northwest Electrical, LLC.
5011 S 279th St
X
X
X
X
X
$140,488.00
Auburn, WA 98001
$145,416.00
Bernard Jendra-Szczyk
Omega Contractors, Inc.
P.O. Box 430
X
X
X
X
X
c"'�80
Duvall, WA 98019
$131,400.00
Gordan Wagster
Seahurst Electric
2915 Chestnut St.
X
X
X
X
X
c"�58
Everett, WA 98201
$125,150.84
Jack Southwick
Totem Electric
P.O. Box 1093
X
X
X
X
X
X
$99,�75
2332 S. Jefferson
$109,664.25
Tacoma, WA 98402
Mark Stephens
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $150,000.00
LEGEND:
Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage
M
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact......
Executive/City Clerk
Bonnie Walton
Subject:
Bid opening on November 3, 2009, for CAG-09-173,
126th Ave. SE Utility Project
Exhibits:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tabulation Sheet (24 bids)
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Al #: . r
For Agenda of:
November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept.....
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $452,789.07 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $655,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $898,975.84
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the
following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project
budget, and there were no irregularities with the low bid. Therefore staff recommends
acceptance of the low bid submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$452,789.07.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of $452,789.07.
X
010
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT p ^C�rof�O�
M E M O R A N D U M
RENTON
DATE: November 4, 2009 NOV 0 4 2009
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk RECEIVED
FROM: Mike Benoit, Wastewater Utility Engineer (ext. 7206) V,(OCITY CLERK'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Bid Award for 1261h Avenue SE Utility Project
The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids submitted for the 126th Ave SE
Utility project and recommends that the bid be awarded to Rodarte Construction Inc.
We are requesting that an agenda bill for "Council Concur' be prepared for the
November 9, 2009, Council Meeting.
The bid opening was on Tuesday, November 3, 2009. There were 24 bids received.
There were no irregularities in the low bids. The low bidder is Rodarte Construction, Inc.
with a bid of $452,789.07 ($250,361.90 sewer and $202,427.17 water). The engineer's
estimate was $898,975.84.
The project budget amount is $655,000 ($400,000 sewer and $255,000 water). The low
bid is within the amount budgeted by the two utilities.
The project will install approximately 1,143 linear feet of new 8" diameter sanitary
sewer main and 1,285 linear feet of 8" diameter water main.
Attachments
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
Dave Christensen, Wastewater Utility Supervisor
Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor
H:\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-3514 126th Ave SE Sewer Extension\Specifications\Award-Clerk-
126th.doc\MABtp
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item Unit Est.
I\ No. Description Oil--
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
8.
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
20
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
City of Renton
Engineers Estimate Rodarte Construction, Inc
Unit Bid Unit
Price Amount Price
Bid
Amount
80,000.00
80,000.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
100.00
100.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
1,800.00
1,800.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
18,000.00
18,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
200.00
400.00
75.00
85,725.00
50.00
57,150.00
70.00
46,900.00
34.00
22,780.00
5,500.00
16,500.00
2,700.00
8,100.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
2.50
2,857.50
2.00
2,286.00
100.00
128,500.00
48.00
61,680.00
1,300.00
6,500.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
16,000.00
3,000.00
12,000.00
8,000.00
32,000.00
2,000.00
8,000.00
150.00
1,500.00
150.00
1,500.00
2,500.00
70,000.00
650.00
18,200.00
17.00
68,000.00
12.00
48,000.00
25.00
5,500.00
8.00
1,760.00
35.00
154,000.00
25.00
110,000.00
35.00
7,000.00
25.00
5,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
250.00
250.00
40.00
4,000.00
60.00
6,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
Subtotal $820,982.50 Subtotal $413,506.00
Tax 9.5% $77,993.34 Tax $39,283.07
Total $898,975.84 Total $452,789.07
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
I\ No.
Description
Unit
Est.
Quantity
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
20
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
Durnford & Sons Universal/Land Construction Cc
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
28,000.00
28,000.00
35,500.00
35,500.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
17,500.00
17,500.00
500.00
500.00
3,400.00
3,400.00
500.00
1,000.00
200.00
400.00
61.00
69,723.00
75.00
85,725.00
52.00
34,840.00
35.00
23,450.00
3,400.00
10,200.00
7,500.00
22,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
1.50
1,714.50
2.00
2,286.00
50.50
64,892.50
49.00
62,965.00
1,100.00
5,500.00
1,200.00
6,000.00
3,000.00
12,000.00
5,600.00
22,400.00
3,500.00
14,000.00
2,500.00
10,000.00
100.00
1,000.00
260.00
2,600.00
1,200.00
33,600.00
1,050.00
29,400.00
18.00
72,000.00
0.01
40.00
1.00
220.00
20.50
4,510.00
12.00
52,800.00
20.00
88,000.00
65.00
13,000.00
26.00
5,200.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
90.00
9,000.00
40.00
4,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
Subtotal
$439,990.00
Subtotal
$445,376.00
Tax
$41,799.05
Tax
$42,310.72
Total $481,789.05 Total $487,686.72
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
N No. Descri
Unit Est.
Qus
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
20
H.M.A. Class''/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
Laser Underground Pivetta Brothers Construction In,
Unit Bid Unit Bid
Price Amount Price Amount
30,000.00
30,000.00
42,800.00
42,800.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
4,550.00
4,550.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4,300.00
4,300.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
9,000.00
9,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
310.00
620.00
80.00
91,440.00
67.00
76,581.00
50.00
33,500.00
60.00
40,200.00
4,000.00
12,000.00
3,000.00
9,000.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
9,500.00
9,500.00
1.00
1,143.00
2.00
2,286.00
40.00
51,400.00
36.00
46,260.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
1,280.00
6,400.00
3,500.00
14,000.00
4,400.00
17,600.00
3,500.00
14,000.00
3,100.00
12,400.00
200.00
2,000.00
260.00
2,600.00
1,000.00
28,000.00
778.00
21,784.00
0.01
40.00
1.00
4,000.00
0.01
2.20
20.00
4,400.00
28.00
123,200.00
28.00
123,200.00
30.00
6,000.00
27.00
5,400.00
500.00
500.00
425.00
425.00
35.00
3,500.00
43.00
4,300.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,500.00
8,500.00
Subtotal $452,225.20 Subtotal $460,106.00
Tax $42,961.39 Tax $43,710.07
Total $495,186.59 Total $503,816.07
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
R L Alia Company
Buno Construction LLC
E Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
� No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
30,000.00
30,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
1,000.00
1,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
1,000.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
5,000.00
5,000.00
11,200.00
11,200.00
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
1,000.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
200.00
400.00
800.00
1,600.00
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
110.00
125,730.00
90.00
102,870.00
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
50.00
33,500.00
60.00
40,200.00
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
2,000.00
6,000.00
3,500.00
10,500.00
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
1,000.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
1.00
1,143.00
1.00
1,143.00
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
96.00
123,360.00
35.00
44,975.00
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
1,000.00
5,000.00
900.00
4,500.00
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
5,000.00
20,000.00
4,000.00
16,000.00
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
2,000.00
8,000.00
2,500.00
10,000.00
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
100.00
1,000.00
100.00
1,000.00
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
1,000.00
28,000.00
1,000.00
28,000.00
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
0.10
400.00
9.00
36,000.00
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
0.10
22.00
1.00
220.00
20
H.M.A. Class'/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
12.75
56,100.00
15.00
66,000.00
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
30.00
6,000.00
30.00
6,000.00
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
50.00
5,000.00
35.00
3,500.00
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
2,000.00
2,000.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
Subtotal
$461,155.00
Subtotal
$461,208.00
Tax
$43,809.73
Tax
$43,814.76
Total
$504,964.73
Total
$505,022.76
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
� No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Traffic Control
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Connection to Existing Water Main
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
H.M.A. Class 1/z" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Driveway Restoration
Landscape Restoration
Unit
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Cubic Yard
Each
Ton
Ton
Sq Yard
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Sq Yard
Lump Sum
Est.
1
1
1
2
1,143
670
3
1
1,143
1,285
5
4
4
10
28
4,000
220
4,400
200
1
100
1
Plats Plus, Inc Hoffman Construction, Inc
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
47,250.00
47,250.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,250.00
5,250.00
5,500.00
5,500.00
7,250.00
7,250.00
21,500.00
21,500.00
7,900.00
7,900.00
7,000.00
7,000.00
6,425.00
6,425.00
650.00
1,300.00
460.00
920.00
53.00
60,579.00
74.00
84,582.00
40.00
26,800.00
92.00
61,640.00
4,500.00
13,500.00
6,500.00
19,500.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
1,270.00
1,270.00
1.50
1,714.50
1.00
1,143.00
35.00
44,975.00
50.20
64,507.00
1,250.00
6,250.00
1,209.00
6,045.00
3,850.00
15,400.00
4,120.00
16,480.00
6,500.00
26,000.00
3,540.00
14,160.00
185.00
1,850.00
164.00
1,640.00
1,070.00
29,960.00
1,050.00
29,400.00
10.00
40,000.00
0.01
40.00
25.00
5,500.00
0.10
22.00
19.00
83,600.00
25.80
113,520.00
20.00
4,000.00
40.25
8,050.00
935.00
935.00
400.00
400.00
33.00 3,300.00 58.00 5,800.00
17, 500.00 17, 500.00 10, 000.00 10, 000.00
Subtotal $472,913.50
Tax $44,926.78
Total $517,840.28
Subtotal $490,944.00
Tax $46,639.68
Total $537,583.68
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
SCI Infrastructure, LLC Kar-Vel Construction
E Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
l\ No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
34,000.00
34,000.00
49,000.00
49,000.00
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
35,000.00
35,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
3,600.00
3,600.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
40,000.00
40,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
900.00
900.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
500.00
1,000.00
200.00
400.00
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
70.00
80,010.00
82.00
93,726.00
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
55.00
36,850.00
52.00
34,840.00
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
2,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
2.00
2,286.00
2.00
2,286.00
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
40.00
51,400.00
54.00
69,390.00
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
1,000.00
5,000.00
900.00
4,500.00
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
3,700.00
14,800.00
5,000.00
20,000.00
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
3,600.00
14,400.00
6,000.00
24,000.00
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
200.00
2,000.00
20.00
200.00
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
800.00
22,400.00
1,100.00
30,800.00
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
4.00
16,000.00
2.00
8,000.00
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
19.00
4,180.00
10.00
2,200.00
20
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
21.00
92,400.00
24.00
105,600.00
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
50.00
10,000.00
32.00
6,400.00
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
75.00
7,500.00
60.00
6,000.00
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
15,000.00
15,000.00
12,000.00
12,000.00
Subtotal
$499,726.00
Subtotal
$502,942.00
Tax
$47,473.97
Tax
$47,779.49
Total
$547,199.97
Total
$550,721.49
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
IN No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Descri
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Traffic Control
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Connection to Existing Water Main
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
H.M.A. Class'/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Driveway Restoration
Landscape Restoration
Unit Est
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Cubic Yard
Each
Ton
Ton
Sq Yard
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Sq Yard
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
2
1,143
670
3
1
1,143
1,285
5
4
4
10
28
4,000
220
4,400
200
1
100
1
RJC Construction Group Johansen Excavating, Inc.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
24,424.78
24,424.78
41,600.00
41,600.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
7,650.00
7,650.00
5,300.00
5,300.00
4,100.00
4,100.00
63,332.31
63,332.31
70,000.00
70,000.00
10,374.91
10,374.91
9,500.00
9,500.00
150.00
300.00
800.00
1,600.00
59.99
68,568.57
46.75
53,435.25
34.81
23,322.70
53.00
35,510.00
2,773.93
8,321.79
2,700.00
8,100.00
2,879.41
2,879.41
1,775.00
1,775.00
2.06
2,354.58
1.00
1,143.00
51.90
66,691.50
36.00
46,260.00
1,072.98
5,364.90
850.00
4,250.00
3,641.91
14,567.64
3,900.00
15,600.00
4,777.74
19,110.96
3,700.00
14,800.00
316.21
3,162.10
155.00
1,550.00
601.87
16,852.36
1,000.00
28,000.00
12.95
51,800.00
16.65
66,600.00
30.24
6,652.80
23.00
5,060.00
23.91
105,204.00
23.60
103,840.00
17.26
3,452.00
30.00
6,000.00
2,150.00
2,150.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
57.03
5,703.00
26.50
2,650.00
14,917.39
14,917.39
7,500.00
7,500.00
Subtotal $528,307.70
Tax $50,189.23
Total $578,496.93
Subtotal $537,523.25
Tax $51,064.71
Total $588,587.96
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
IN No.
1 . Mobilization & Demobilization
2 Trench Excavation Safety Systems
3 Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
4 Traffic Control
5 Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
6 Re -Establish Existing Monuments
7 Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
8 Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
9 Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
10 Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
11 Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
12 Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
13 Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
14 Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
15 Connection to Existing Water Main
16 Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
17 Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
18 Select Imported Trench Backfill
19 Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
20 H.M.A. Class'/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
21 Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
22 Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
23 Driveway Restoration
24 Landscape Restoration
Unit Est.
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Cubic Yard
Each
Ton
Ton
Sq Yard
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Sq Yard
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
1
2
1,143
670
3
1
1,143
1,285
5
4
4
10
28
4,000
220
4,400
200
1
100
1
Equipment Specialist, Inc. Lakeridge Development LLC
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
14,000.00
14,000.00
22,000.00
22,000.00
6,600.00'6,600.00,
3,700.00
3,700.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
5,200.00
5,200.00
21,000.00
21,000.00
17,000.00
17,000.00
4,500.00
4,500.00
700.00
700.00
1,200.00
2,400.00
600.00
1,200.00
48.00
54,864.00
81.16
92,765.88
42.00
28,140.00
91.00
60,970.00
4,500.00
13,500.00
4,700.00
14,100.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
5,200.00
5,200.00
2.15
2,457.45
4.20
4,800.60
40.00
51,400.00
51.65
66,370.25
1,400.00
7,000.00
1,400.00
7,000.00
4,500.00
18,000.00
4,000.00
16,000.00
2,500.00
10,000.00
4,000.00
16,000.00
300.00
3,000.00
110.00
1,100.00
1,600.00
44,800.00
900.00
25,200.00
24.75
99,000.00
16.25
65,000.00
40.00
8,800.00
18.00
3,960.00
21.00
92,400.00
22.00
96,800.00
75.00
15,000.00
75.00
15,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
120.00 12,000.00 35.00 3,500.00
12,000.00 12,000.00 17,000.00 17,000.00
$538 361 45z
Subtotal $51 144 34.<
Tax
$589 505 79
Total
Subtotal $561,766.73
Tax $53,367.84
Total $615,134.57
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
� No.
Description
Unit
Est.
Quantit
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
2
Trench. Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
20
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
TE Briggs Construction Construct Co.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
42,150.00
42,150.00
63,900.00
63,900.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,600.00
5,600.00
4,120.00
4,120.00
2,350.00
2,350.00
52,580.00
52,580.00
30,200.00
30,200.00
7,850.00
7,850.00
9,250.00
9,250.00
650.00
1,300.00
450.00
900.00
57.00
65,151.00
89.00
101, 727.00
51.00
34,170.00
129.00
86,430.00
3,500.00
10,500.00
3,700.00
11,100.00
2,875.00
2,875.00
3,250.00
3,250.00
2.60
2,971.80
2.50
2,857.50
57.00
73,245.00
58.00
74,530.00
1,600.00
8,000.00
970.00
4,850.00
2,875.00
11,500.00
4,100.00
16,400.00
1,393.00
5,572.00
3,500.00
14,000.00
158.00
1,580.00
170.00
1,700.00
1,305.00
36,540.00
950.00
26,600.00
17.25
69,000.00
11.50
46,000.00
35.00
7,700.00
38.00
8 360.00
24.00
105,600.00
14.00
61,600.00
42.25
8,450.00
31.00
6,200.00
400.00
400.00
375.00
375.00
53.00 5,300.00
15,789 16 15 789.16
Subtotal $5,7-1,343Y96
Tax $54 847 68
Total $632 191 64° Y
44.00 4,400.00
2,500.00 2,500.00
Subtotal $585 079Z61
Tax $55 582 55'
Total $640 662 05
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
Reed Trucking
Donovan Excavating, Inc
E Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
IN No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
30,000.00
30,000.00
23,000.00
23,000.00
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4,500.00
4,500.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
20,000.00
20,000.00
37,500.00
37,500.00
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
10,000.00
10,000.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
750.00
1,500.00
300.00
600.00
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
122.00
139,446.00
74.00
84,582.00
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
78.00
52,260.00
80.00
53,600.00
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
4,000.00
12,000.00
4,225.00
12,675.00
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
2,500.00
2,500.00
3,250.00
3,250.00
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
1.00
1,143.00
2.00
2,286.00
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
54.00
69,390.00
58.00
74,530.00
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
1,000.00
5,000.00
1,315.00
6,575.00
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
4,000.00
16,000.00
4,655.00
18,620.00
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
4,000.00
16,000.00
3,865.00
15,460.00
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
400.00
4,000.00
275.00
2,750.00
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
1,800.00
50,400.00
1,530.00
42,840.00
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
2.50
10,000.00
18.00
72,000.00
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
10.00
2,200.00
30.00
6,600.00
20
H.M.A. Class'/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
25.90
113,960.00
24.00
105,600.00
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
26.00
5,200.00
35.00
7,000.00
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
500.00
500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
45.00
4,500.00
70.00
7,000.00
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
14,000.00
14,000.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
Subtotal
$586,999.00
Subtotal
$601,468.00
Tax
$55,764.91
Tax
$57,139.46
Total
$642,763.91
Total
$658,607.46
Project Titl(126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
DMSL Construction, Inc
Mosbrucker Excavating, Inc
E Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
� No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
15,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
25,375.00
25,375.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
15,225.00
15,225.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
35,700.00
35,700.00
45,000.00
45,000.00
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
8,200.00
8,200.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
550.00
1,100.00
600.00
1,200.00
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
112.50
128,587.50
90.00
102,870.00
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal'Foot
670
97.85
65,559.50
80.00
53,600.00
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
3,570.00
10,710.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
2,933.50
2,933.50
7,500.00
7,500.00
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers .
Lineal Foot
1,143
3.10
3,543.30
2.00
2,286.00
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
45.90
58,981.50
40.00
51,400.00
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
801.00
4,005.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
3,850.00
15,400.00
4,000.00
16,000.00
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
1,817.00
7,268.00
3,000.00
12,000.00
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
257.50
2,575.00
500.00
5,000.00
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
1,072.00
30,016.00
650.00
18,200.00
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
19.50
78,000.00
15.00
60,000.00
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
15.50
3,410.00
50.00
11,000.00
20
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
15.50
68,200.00
30.00
132,000.00
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
46.00
9,200.00
50.00
10,000.00
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
3,060.00
3,060.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
5.15
515.00
100.00
10,000.00
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
10,300.00
10,300.00
7,000.00
7,000.00
Subtotal
Subtotal
$602,864.30
$605,056.00
Tax
$57,272.11
Tax
$57,480.32
Total
$660,136.41
Total
$662,536.32
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
Kamins Construction
Titan Earthwork
E Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
� No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization & Demobilization
Lump Sum
1
94,875.00
94,875.00
60,000.00
60,000.00
2
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Lump Sum
1
6,050.00
6,050.00
18,000.00
18,000.00
3
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Lump Sum
1
4,290.00
4,290.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
4
Traffic Control
Lump Sum
1
44,990.00
44,990.00
65,000.00
65,000.00
5
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Lump Sum
1
2,000.00
2,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
6
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Each
2
550.00
1,100.00
240.00
480.00
7
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
1,143
70.90
81,038.70
88.25
100,869.75
8
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Lineal Foot
670
38.48
25,781.60
94.25
63,147.50
9
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Each
3
4,052.03
12,156.09
4625 00'
13,875 00;
10
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Each
1
1,663.20
1,663.20
1,125.00
1,125.00
11
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Lineal Foot
1,143
2.98
3,406.14
1.75
2,000.25
12
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Lineal Foot
1,285
63.86
82,060.10
47.00
60,395.00
13
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Each
5
1,034.00
5,170.00
1,325.00
6,625.00
14
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
4
4,572.98
18,291.92
3,100.00
12,400.00
15
Connection to Existing Water Main
Each
4
3,212.00
12,848.00
2,100.00
8,400.00
16
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Cubic Yard
10
273.90
2,739.00
330.00
3,300.00
17
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Each
28
995.50
27,874.00
1,725.00
48,300.00
18
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Ton
4,000
20.15
80,600.00
16.50
66,000.00
19
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
Ton
220
17.23
3,790.60
16.50
3,630.00
20
H.M.A. Class'/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Sq Yard
4,400
17.87
78,628.00
23.35
102,740.00
21
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Lineal Foot
200
35.22
7,044.00
22.50
4,500.00
22
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Lump Sum
1
1,028.50
1,028.50
1,000.00
1,000.00
23
Driveway Restoration
Sq Yard
100
66.03
6,603.00
60.50
6,050.00
24
Landscape Restoration
Lump Sum
1
6,600.00
6,600.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
Subtotal
$610,627.85
Subtotal
Tax
$58,009.65
Tax t; $64,;917.06
Total
$668,637.50
Total $748 254 56
Project TitIE 126th Avenue SE Utility Project
BID DATE: DATE
E Item
l\ No.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Mobilization & Demobilization
Trench Excavation Safety Systems
Construction Surveying, Staking, and As-Builts
Traffic Control
Temporary Erosion / Sedimentation Control
Re -Establish Existing Monuments
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 6" PVC Side Sewer Pipe
Furnish and Install 48" Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Connect New Sanitary Sewer to Exist Outside Drop MH
Television Inspection of Sanitary Sewers
Furnish & Install 8" Cl 52 DI Water Pipe w/ Polywrap & Fittings
Furnish and install 8" Gate Valve Assembly
Furnish and Install Fire Hydrant Assembly
Connection to Existing Water Main
Concrete for Thrust Blockings, Dead -Man Anchor Blocks
Furnish and Install 3/4" Water Service Connection
Select Imported Trench Backfill
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Foundation Material
H.M.A. Class 1/2" PG 64-22 for Road Restoration
Remove and Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
Replace Pavement Markings and Traffic Buttons
Driveway Restoration
Landscape Restoration
Unit
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Cubic Yard
Each
Ton
Ton
Sq Yard
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Sq Yard
Lump Sum
Est.
Quantity
1
1
1
1
1
2
1,143
670
3
1
1,143
1,285
5
4
4
10
28
4,000
220
4,400
200
1
100
1
Ceccanti
Unit
Price
2,600.75
3,224.93
97,204.12
24,265.40
416.96
60.06
126.53
2,998.94
2,916.46
3.12
42.45
1,345.99
3,642.45
3,322.97
260.50
2,308.64
20.55
44.69
28.46
17.69
520.16
65.35
15,604.76
Bid
Amount
43,949.81
2,600.75
3,224.93
97,204.12
24,265.40
833.92
68,648.58
84,775.10
8,996.82
2,916.46
3,566.16
54,548.25
6,729.95
14,569.80
13,291.88
2,605.00
64,641.92
82,200.00
9,831.80
125,224.00
3,538.00
520.16
6,535.00
15,604.76
Subtotal $740,822.57
Tax $70,378.14
Total $811,200.71
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
2ROIECT: 126th Ave. SE Utility Project
CAG-09-173
DATE: November 3, 2009
Page 1 of 2
FORMS
BID
Proposal
BIDDER
& Triple
L&I
Bid
Sched. Of
Form
Cert
Bond
Prices
"Includes Sales Tax
Buno Construction, LLC
20219 99th Ave. SE
Snohomish, WA 98296
x
x
x
x
$505,022.76
Brett A. Lane
Ceccanti
4116 Brookdale Rd. E.
Tacoma, WA 98446
x
x
x
x
$811,200.72
Donna M. Motland
Construct Co
1621 Pease Ave
Sumner, WA 98390
x
x
x
x
C639 ,ono. oc
Cy Morse
$640,662.05
Donovan Excavating, Inc.
�610 Tacoma Ave.
Sumner, WA 98390
x
x
x
x
$658,607.46
James K. Donovan
DMSL Construction, Inc.
20902 67th Ave. NE, Ste 357
Arlington, WA 98223
x
x
x
x
$660,136.41
Debbie Welch
Durnford & Sons
P.O. Box 7530
Bonney Lake, WA 98391
x
x
x
x
$481,789.05
Dave Durnford
Hoffman Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 845
Enumclaw, WA 98022
x
x
x
x
$537,583.68
Brad Hoffman
Johansen Excavating, Inc.
28215 112th St. E.
Buckley, WA 98321
x
x
x
x
$588,587.96
Jacob Cimmer
Kamins Construction
19315 Ross Road
Bothell, WA 98011
x
x
x
x
$668,637.50
Chad Kamins
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: 126th Ave. SE Utility Project
CAG-09-173
DATE: November 3, 2009
Page 2 of 3
FORMS
BID
Proposal
BIDDER
& Triple
L&I
Bid
Sched. Of
Form
Cert
Bond
Prices
"Includes Sales Tax
Kar-Vel Construction
P.O. Box 58275
Renton, WA 98058
x
x
x
x
$550,721.49
Mike Waldner
Lakeridge Development, LLC
P.O. Box 146
Renton, WA 98057
x
x
x
x
$615,134.57
Wayne Jones
Laser Underground & Earthworks
20417 87th Ave. SE
Snohomish, WA 98296
x
x
x
x
$495,186.59
Brett A. Lane
Mosbrucker Excavating, Inc
P.O. Box 745
x
x
$662,536.32
Bothell, WA 98041
Pivetta Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 370
Sumner, WA 98390
x
x
x
x
$503,816.07
Mark Pivetta
Plats Plus, Inc.
720 Cedar Ave. Ste. C
Marysville, WA 98270
x
x
x
x
$517,840.28
Brendan Reeves
Reed Trucking & Excavating
P.O. Box 731629
Puyallup, WA 98373
x
x
x
x
$642,763.91
Shawn J. Reed
RJC Construction Group
P.O. Box 823
Enumclaw, WA 98022
x
x
x
x
$578,496.93
Shawn Murphy
Rocon Equipment Specialist, Inc.
P.O. Box 1008
Black Diamond, WA 98010
x
x
x
x
$588,848-7�3
Patrick S. Roth
$589,505.79
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
?ROJECT: 126th Ave. SE Utility Project
CAG-09-173
DATE: November 3, 2009
Page 3 of 3
FORMS
BID
Proposal
BIDDER
& Triple
L&I
Bid
Sched. Of
Form
Cert
Bond
Prices
"Includes Sales Tax
Rodarte Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 1875
Auburn, WA 98071
x
x
x
x
$452,789.07
JR Rodarte
R.L. Alia Company
107 Williams Ave. S.
Renton, WA 98057
x
x
x
x
$504,764.73
Richard L. Alia
SCI Infrastructure, LLC
1508 Valentine Ave. SE
Pacific, WA 98047
x
x
x
x
$547,199.97
Mark Scoccolo
T.E. Briggs Construction
.1.0. Box 565
Edmonds, WA 98020
x
x
x
x
t"',48
Tracy Briggs
$632,191.64
Titan Earthwork
13806 16th St. E.
Sumner, WA 98390
x
x
x
x
$751,484.
William E. Gill
$748,254.56
Universal/Land Construction Co
P.O. Box 329
Woodinville, WA 98072
x
x
x
x
$487,686.72
James L. Bold
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
LEGEND:
Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage
$898,975.84
ti
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
AJLS/City Clerk
Bonnie Walton, x6502
Subject:
Honey Creek Estates Annexation Referendum Petition
Exhibits:
King County Certificate of Sufficiency with
Island Annexation Petition Worksheet
Petition with Ordinance No. 5489 attachment
Resolution
I Al #: I i GT .
For Agenda of: November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information .........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Council Concur Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On October 19, 2009, a referendum petition consisting of two signature pages was filed by John
Pavlik, 11212 147th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98057, to remain a part of unincorporated King
County and revoke Ordinance No. 5489, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 18.2 acres, generally located immediately south of Northeast
12th Street, if extended, and immediately west of 148th Avenue SE, known as the Honey Creek
Estates annexation area. As required by law, the petition was submitted to King County
Department of Elections within three days for determination of sufficiency. A Certificate of
Sufficiency was issued by King County on October 30, 2009, and received thereafter by the City
Clerk, along with the Island Annexation Petition Worksheet indicating that 11 out of 83
registered voters in the area had signed the petition.
X
The City Council has two options to consider. The first option is to reconsider annexation Ordinance
No. 5489, and repeal it in its entirety. The second option is to submit the measure for approval or
disapproval to a vote of the people within the subject annexation area. City administrative staff has
recommended the issue be submitted to a vote of the people within the annexation area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Submit the measure to a vote of the people in the Honey Creek Estates annexation area by special
election to occur on February 9, 2010.
0
LIZ
King County
Elections
CERTIFICATE
OF SUFFICIENCY
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition, originally submitted on October
29, 2009, to the King County Elections Department, for Honey Creek
Estates Annexation has been examined and the signatures thereon
carefully compared with the voter registration records of the King County
Elections Department, and as a result of such examination, found to be
sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington SMC
1.10.110 and 35A.01.040.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2009
Sherril irector
Island Annexation Petition Worksheet
Petition Method for Annexation of Unincorporated
Island of Territory
Jurisdiction: City of Renton
Annexation Name: Honey Creek Estates
RCW 35.13.1821
Annexation of unincorporated island of territory — Referendum —
Election.
The annexation ordinance provided for in RCW 35.13.182 is subject to referendum for forty-five days after
its passage. Upon the filing of a timely and sufficient referendum petition with the legislative body, signed by
qualified electors in number equal to not less than ten percerif of the votes cast in the last general state
election in the area to be annexed, the question of annexation shall be submitted to the voters of the area in
a general election if one is to be held within ninety days or at a special election called for that purpose
according to RCW 29A.04.330. Notice of the election shall be given as provided in RCW 35.13.080 and the
election shall be conducted as provided in the general election law. The annexation shall be deemed
approved by the voters unless a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in opposition thereto.
After the expiration of the forty-fifth day from but excluding the date of passage of the annexation
ordinance, if no timely and sufficient referendum petition has been filed, the area annexed shall become a
part of the city or town upon the date fixed in the ordinance of annexation.
Date Received: 10/29/2009
Number of Registered Voters: 83
Number of Valid Signatures for Sufficiency: 9
Jurisdiction Name: Precinct Portion:3557.803
Jurisdiction Abbreviation:
Jurisdiction Type:
In Production or Redistricting:
Date Petition Forwarded to Voter Services: 10/30/2009
Contact: Bonnie Walton - City Clerk of Renton - 425.430.6510
Signatures Checked by:2Date: / i M - 0 g
Number of Valid Signatures: I
Date Petition Forwarded to Superintendent : 10 ' D
Petition Determined Sufficient: Yes No
Date City Notified : l 0,1v- 0/0 9
Annexation Referendum Election Petition
In reference to City of Renton Ordinance No. 5489; proposed Honey Creek Estates Annexation; City -initiated, unincorporated island/ordinance method (Per RCW 35A.14.295 and RCW 35A.14.297): We, the
undersigned residents of the proposed annexation area, do not want to be annexed into the City of Renton, and instead desire to remain an unincorporated area of King County. The purpose of this petition Is
to initiate a referendum election (Per RCW 35A.14.299) to determine whether the area annexed under Renton City Council Ordinance No. 5489 is to be made part of the City of Renton or be returned to King
County as an unincorporated area.
If the number of signatures meets or exceeds 10% of those in the area who voted in the last general election, the annexation becomes subject to a referendum election wherein a majority of those voting is
required to reject the annexation, per RCW 35A-14-299. This election, open solely to the people in the annexed area, is to take place during the next general election if one is to take place within 90 days of the
petitions' filing, or, if not, at a special election called for this purpose.
Honey Creek Estates Annexation legal description: Those portions of Sections 10 & 11 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: The north 20 acres of the
Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section 10, LESS that portion platted as Brookefield II, as recorded in Volume 224 of Plats, pages 80-83, records of King County; TOGETHER with the west 30 feet
(14eh Ave SE) of said section 11 adjacent to the above described. Per Exhibit A of Renton City Council Ordinance No. 5489.
A Copy of City of Renton Ordinance No. 5489, which contains a map of the area. Is attached.
CITY OF RENTON
OCT, 1 9 2009
No.
Signature
Printed Name
Address
Regis-
Property
Date
Phone/e-mail
Comments RECEIVED
tered
Voter?
Owner?
(optional)
(Optional)CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
(
���C�t��
2
_ -
�\�c 1g 1��-�" .-'iV%u �•c�
'b
CL+ �fYl�-J�•
F
�
V1
3
\f
l� U�'
pSf r `
e C ✓� f
v1TcT)t-tC.�c'C
1
/4o
�(.Co;Fbthc�sM ��u1.ts�c�Li
Y
✓ i L. ✓l�i
G'
iia�s.
J�
P
�,,
7
\
!
C. )'1►Q�r.,.s/os
IH(rtC e,E 11TfA S1
8
(�
Lw , Sl/� t Vim_
i�v t Vt`u
I`tcot%:j lt3"� .{
hsy\, w %A- 4:S l
iC
f i �c-lDot
WARNING
Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or
she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Annexation Referendum Election Petition
In reference to City of Renton Ordinance No. 5489; proposed Honey Creek Estates Annexation; City -initiated, unincorporated Island/ordinance method (Per RCW 35A.14.295 and RCW 35A.14.297): We, the
undersigned residents of the proposed annexation area, do not want to be annexed into the City of Renton, and instead desire to remain an unincorporated area of King County. The purpose of this petition is
to Initiate a referendum election (Per RCW 35A.14.299) to determine whether the area annexed under Renton City Council Ordinance No. 5489 is to be made part of the City of Renton or be returned to King
County as an unincorporated area.
If the number of signatures meets or exceeds 10% of those in the area who voted in the last general election, the annexation becomes subject to a referendum election wherein a majority of those voting is
required to reject the annexation, per RCW 35A-14-299. This election, open solely to the people in the annexed area, is to take place during the next general election if one is to take place within 90 days of the
petitions' filing, or, If not, at a special election called for this purpose.
Honey Creek Estates Annexation legal description: Those portions of Sections 10 & 11 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: The north 20 acres of the
Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section 10, LESS that portion platted as Brookefield II, as recorded in Volume 224 of Plats, pages 80-83, records of King County; TOGETHER with the west 30 feet
(148`h Ave SE) of said section 11 adjacent to the above described. Per Exhibit A of Renton City Council Ordinance No. 5489. CITY OF RENTON
A Copy of City of Renton Ordinance No. 5489, which contains a map of the area, is attached.
o C r. 1 9 2009
No.
Slgna re i
Printed Name
Address
Regis-
Property
Date
Phone/e-mail
Comment K'S OFACEL
tere
Owner?
o
(optional)
(P )
(Optional) Nvrtnrc�ejae•�I
Voter?
0 Z I
V
2
V
l` �Y tN lr .rt
oz'4rC v't - 'bra
112\l I �'1 =� 'Z, c
N C S
C S
u i if
5
4
5
6
7
8
WARNING
Every person who s Is petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one o` )etitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs m when In -
she is otherwise no, 3d to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5489
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON )HONEY CREEK ESTATES; FILE NO. A-03-
003).
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 code cities are authorized to annex
unincorporated islands of territory when the area has boundaries that are at least eighty
percent (80 %) contiguous to the city and is less than one hundred (100) acres in size; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 the legislative body of the code city
may resolve to annex such unincorporated islands and describe the boundaries of the area,
state the number of voters residing therein, and set a date for a public hearing in the matter;
and
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council approved Resolution Number 3998 calling for the
annexation of the Honey Creek Estates area under the unincorporated island method and
setting the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed
annexation on March 2, 2009, affording proponents and opponents of the proposed annexation
an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board deemed the "Notice of Intention"
approved as of June 2, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site to R-4, four
units per net acre;
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5489
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true
and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to annexations using the
unincorporated island method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 and 297 have been
met. The area called Honey Creek Estates and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit
B is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Renton; the property being described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said propertyapproximateiy 18.2-acres, is generally located immediately south
Northeast 12t.Street, if extended and immediately west of 148 " Avenue
Southeast.)
SECTION II. The owners of property within said annexation area shall not be required
to assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, but all
property in the area shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as
property in the City of Renton, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of
this ordinance with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by
law. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to give notice by publishing in a newspaper
of general circulation at least one time per week for two consecutive weeks subsequent to the
adoption of this ordinance. That notice shall include the proposed effective date of this
2
ORDINANCE NO. 5489
annexation. a description of the property to be annexed, and statement that the area will be
subject to City of Renton Zoning Code and zoned to R-4, four dwelling units per net acre,
SECTION IV. This ordinance is subject to referendum for forty-five (45) days and shall
be effective following the passage of the forty-fifth (45t") day from but excluding the date of
passage of this ordinance if no timely and sufficient referendum petition has been filed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of September , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Cler#
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of September , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 9/18/2009 ( summary )
ORD:1571:7/29/09:scr
3
Denis Law, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 5489
HONEY CREEK ESTATES ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION .
Those portions of Sections 10 & 11 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M., in King
County, Washington, described as follows:
The north 20 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, LESS
that portion platted as Brookefield H, as recorded in Volume 224 of Plats, pages 80 - 83, records
of King County;
TOGETHER with the west 30 feet (148"' Ave SE) of said Section I 1 adjacent to the above
described.
I of 1 09/23/2008 1:49 PM
ORDINANCE NO. 5489
4 Y o Department of Community
° s - + & Economic Development
{ Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Adriana Johnson, Planning Technician
December 10, 2008 L
o iso ao
1:4,200 F�f
Produced by City of Renton (c) 2008. the City of Renton all tights
resolved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited to
accuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product.
Honey Creek Estates Annexation
Vicinity Map
iV�Honey Creek Estates Annexation Boundary
File Name::1EDNSPIGlS_projectstennexationsl
honey_creeti estateslmxdsll honey_creek estates_annex vicinity.mxd
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 2
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES
ANNEXATION AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT.
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5489, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 18.2 acres, generally located immediately south of Northeast
12th Street, if extended, and immediately west of 148th Avenue SE, known as the Honey Creek
Estates annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant to law,
must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
r
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 2
before the qualified electors within the Honey Creek Estates annexation area in the February 9,
2010, ballot.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 2 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
2. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
18.2-acres known as the Honey Creek Estates annexation area and would allow
the area to remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
❑ Yes
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 2 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Denis Law, Mayor
2009.
3
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: November 9, 2009
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Sunset East Annexation Referendum Petition
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
King County Certificate of Sufficiency with
Study Sessions......
Island Annexation Petition Worksheet
Information.........
Petition with Ordinance No. 5491 attachment
Resolution
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Council Concur Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On October 27, 2009, a referendum petition consisting of two signature pages was filed by John
E. Buxton, 14520 SE Renton -Issaquah Road, Renton, WA 98059, to remain a part of
unincorporated King County and revoke Ordinance No. 5491, adopted by the Renton City
Council on September 14, 2009, annexing approximately 15.9 acres, generally located
immediately north of Southeast Renton -Issaquah Road and immediately east of Jericho Avenue
Northeast, if extended, known as the Sunset East annexation area. As required by law, the
petition was submitted to King County Department of Elections within three days for
determination of sufficiency. A Certificate of Sufficiency was issued by King County on October
30, 2009, and received thereafter by the City Clerk, along with the Island Annexation Petition
Worksheet indicating that 7 out of 26 registered voters in the area had signed the petition.
The City Council has two options to consider. The first option is to reconsider annexation Ordinance
No. 5491, and repeal it in its entirety. The second option is to submit the measure for approval or
disapproval to a vote of the people within the subject annexation area. City administrative staff has
recommended the issue be submitted to a vote of the people within the annexation area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Submit the measure to a vote of the people in the Sunset East annexation area by special election
to occur on February 9, 2010.
k,9
King County
Elections
CERTIFICATE
OF SUFFICIENCY
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition, originally submitted on October
29, 2009, to the King County Elections Department, for Sunset East
Annexation has been examined and the signatures thereon carefully
compared with the voter registration records of the King County Elections
Department, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient
under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington SMC 1.10.110
and 35A.01.040.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2009
5
Sherril Hu Director
Island Annexation Petition Worksheet
Petition Method for Annexation of Unincorporated
Island of Territory
Jurisdiction: City of Renton
Annexation Name: Sunset East
RCW 35.13.1821
Annexation of unincorporated island of territory — Referendum —
Election.
The annexation ordinance provided for in RCW 35.13.182 is subject to referendum for forty-five days after
its passage. Upon the filing of a timely and sufficient referendum petition with the legislative body, signed by
qualified electors in number equal -to not less than ten percent of the votes cast in the last general state
election in the area to be annexed, the question of annexation shall be submitted to the voters of the area in
a general election if one is to be held within ninety days or at a special election called for that purpose
according to RCW 29A.04.330. Notice of the election shall be given as provided in RCW 35.13.080 and the
election shall be conducted as provided in the general election law. The annexation shall be deemed
approved by the voters unless a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in opposition thereto.
After the expiration of the forty-fifth day from but excluding the date of passage of the annexation
ordinance, if no timely and sufficient referendum petition has been filed, the area annexed shall become a
part of the city or town upon the date fixed in the ordinance of annexation.
Date Received: 10/29/2009
Number of Registered Voters: 26
Number of Valid Signatures for Sufficiency.,,'3
Jurisdiction Name: GIS.tivill identify voters
Jurisdiction Abbreviation:
Jurisdiction Type:
In Production or Redistricting:
Date Petition Forwarded to Voter Services: 10/30/2009
Contact: Bonnie Walton - City Clerk of Renton - 425.430.6510
Signatures Checked bye. _O Date: (01, o/0q
Number of Valid Signatures:
Date Petition Forwarded to Superintendent: ►r/3o/Fy,'
Petition Determined Sufficient: Yes i✓ No
Date City Notified: (O / 3 O/ O q
I V, Z-009
WARNING
Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a
petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to si n, or who makes
herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ChY OF RENTON #apd he aeml
O C T 2 7 2009 by Claxd,Yr.-4w--ett
PETITION FOR REFERENDUM RECEIVED
To: The City Council of the City of Renton CITY CLERK S OFFICE
We, the undersigned registered voters of King County, State of Washington, residing at the addresses set forth opposite our respective names,
being equal to ten percent (10%) of the total number of names of persons listed as registered voters within King County on the day of the last
preceding state general election, respectfully request that City of Renton Ordinance No. 5491 enacted by the City Council on the 14"' day of
September 2009, be repealed by the Council or, if not so repealed, be referred to a vote of the residents of the Sunset East Annexation area for their
approval or rejection. The title of the said ordinance is as follows:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
RENTON (SUNSET EAST; FILE NO. A-09-002)"
A full, true and correct copy of the ordinance, including map and legal description, as enacted by the City Council is attached to this Petition.
Each of us for himself or herself says:
I have personally signed this petition; I am a registered voter of King County, State of Washington; and my residence address is correctly stated.
Phone/email
No.
Signature
Printed Name
Address
Dak Signed
(optional)
1
{
O k n r u 1 o
I;4
Pi eve a �N �-S U I .l.
I �13
eel bhp wA � oS
2r-
G A, ,
3
�.
►�
s` P f S-e
U •Z c
4
r� nki 0
1� a? 3 ��� S�
/0 a o
& ,•S., o ^ (e,.
5
?
r; •t{-,l rJ Pe
1 N
l v g o (`i Sth P L Sc-
Zvi
---
r
11
V
V
oTo�ba
,0A*A
10/2009
WARNING
Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a
petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes
herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. CITY OF RENTON
PETITION FOR REFERENDUM 0 C T 2 7 2009
To: The City Council of the City of Renton CITY RECEIVEDLFFICE Q•�
We, the undersigned registered voters of King County, State of Washington, residing at the addresses set forth opposite our respective names,
being equal to ten percent (10%) of the total number of names of persons listed as registered voters within King County on the day of the last
preceding state general election, respectfully request that City of Renton Ordinance No. 5491 enacted by the City Council on the 14`h day of
September 2009, be repealed by the Council or, if not so repealed, be referred to a vote of the residents of the Sunset East Annexation area for their
approval or rejection. The title of the said ordinance is as follows:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
RENTON (SUNSET EAST; FILE NO. A-09-002)"
A full, true and correct copy of the ordinance, including map and legal description, as enacted by the City Council is attached to this Petition.
Each of us for hintself or herself says:
I have personally signed this petition; I anz a registered voter of King County, State of Washington; and nzy residence address is correctly stated.
Phone/email
No.
Signature
Printed Name
Address
Date Signed
(optional)
0U/5� (!s1``¢'
�/'?�� s'.G
Q7.c �Sf �7ac�
cyy.�s---7s 7,9
2
d ✓
i(IS3,0 J L �, .�./
f .L a
.1e(�2ol 3i3'
3
a
n
4
5
6
M
V
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5491
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (SUNSET EAST; FILE NO. A-09-002).
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 code cities are authorized to annex
unincorporated islands of territory when the area has boundaries that are at least eighty
percent (80%) contiguous to the city and is less than one hundred (100) acres in size; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 the legislative body of the code city
may resolve to annex such unincorporated islands and describe the boundaries of the area,
state the number of voters residing therein, and set a date for a public hearing in the matter;
.and
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council approved Resolution Number 3997 calling for the
annexation of the Sunset East area .under the unincorporated island method and setting the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed
annexation on March 2, 2009, affording proponents and opponents of the proposed annexation
an opportunity to be heard;, and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board deemed the "Notice of Intention"
approved as of May 29, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site to R-4, four
units per net acre;
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5491
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true
and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to annexations using the
unincorporated island method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.295 and 297 have been
met. The area called Sunset East and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B is
hereby annexed and made a part of he City of Renton; the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 15.9-acres, is generally located immediately north
of Southeast Renton -Issaquah Road and immediately east of Jericho Avenue
Northeast, if extended.]
SECTION II. The owners of property within said annexation area shall not be required
to assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, but all
property in the area shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as
property in the City of Renton, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of
this ordinance with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by
law. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to give notice by publishing in a newspaper
of general circulation at least one time per week for two consecutive weeks subsequent to the
adoption of this ordinance. That notice shall include the proposed effective date of this
2
ORDINANCE N0. 5491
annexation, a description of the property to be annexed, and statement that the area will be
subject to City of Renton Zoning Code and zoned to R-4, four dwelling units per net acre.
SECTION IV. This ordinance is subject to referendum for forty-five (45) days and shall
be effective following the passage of the forty-fifth (45th) day from but excluding the date of
passage of this ordinance if no timely and sufficient referendum petition has been filed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of September , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of September 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 9/18/2009 (summary):
ORD:1573:7/29/09:scr
t'
Denis Law, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 5491
SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of unincorporated King County lying in the Southeast quarter of Section 3,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M., in King County, Washington, bounded on all sides by
the existing limits of the City of Renton, as annexed thereto under Ordinance Nos. 4092, 5068
and 5293, listed in clockwise order beginning with the western boundary of the hereby described.
1 of 1 08/27=08 12:33 PM
ORDINANCE NO. 5491
!
—� W
'z
_ ...
,p •---
!
I o,
U i
fti i.
3
:3
CL
v
rn,
�
w
L
�zY o� Department of Community
±�s� . & Economic Development
lr�'�� Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Adriana Johnson, Planning Technician
December 10, 2008 N
0 195 3
IV eet
1:4,200
_' Rentor. (•-t 2008. the " ty of Renton
is .oarrant es c•t arr, sort, ir,. u,g but;x:. nrt: rl :a
c, me "ac:abi:,:y. accompany t!,is _recuc:
5�.
Sunset East Annexation
Vicinity Map
C21 Sunset East Annexation Bdry
File Naine::\EDNSP\GIS_prejects\annexations\
suns et_east—annexVnxds\1_sunset_east—annex vicinity.mxd
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 3
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT.
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5491, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 15.9 acres, generally located immediately north of Southeast
Renton -Issaquah Road and immediately east of Jericho Avenue Northeast, if extended, known
as the Sunset East annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant
to law, must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION 11. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 3
before the qualified electors within the Sunset East annexation area in the February 9, 2010,
ballot.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 3 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
3. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
15.9-acres known as the Sunset East annexation area and would allow the area to
remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
❑ Yes
[] No
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 3 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
11�11=091a a too 2we]
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2009.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. CED
Staff Contact...... Norma McQuiller - ext 6595
Subject:
Second Round of 2009 Neighborhood Grants
Exhibits:
Issue paper with project descriptions
Recommended Action:
Refer to Community Services Committee
Al #:
For Agenda of: 11-9-09
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
It
Approvals:
Legal Dept.......... X
Finance Dept........ X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $31,340 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $31,340 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Eight project applications and six newsletter applications were submitted for the second round of
neighborhood grant funding. Staff evaluated each request against established criteria. Six projects and
six newsletter grants are recommended for funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve six 2009 Neighborhood Program project applications and six newsletter applications totaling
$31,340.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
'6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
t 1 DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 27, 2009
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: % �., Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Norma McQuiller, Neighborhood Program Coordinator (x6595)
SUBJECT: 2009 Second Round Neighborhood Grant Applications
ISSUE:
Do the fourteen grant applications submitted, which includes six newsletter grants,
comply with the City of Renton's Neighborhood Program objectives and should they be
approved?
RECOMMENDATION:
The Administration recommends approval of six projects and six newsletter applications,
totaling $31,340.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City Council appropriated $82,000 in the 2009 Capital Improvement Program budget
for the Neighborhood Grant Program. In the first round of funding Council approved
$50,660 in grant applications, leaving a balance of $31,340 for a second round.
The grant applications received in this round are shown in the following table. A more
detailed summary of projects is attached.
The following criteria were used to evaluate projects to determine if the objectives of
the Neighborhood Program are met:
■ Project size, location, and complexity are appropriate for the neighborhood
group, and are within a realistic budget.
■ Documentation shows neighborhood participation and adequate volunteer labor
reflecting community support for the project and includes maintenance after
project completion.
■ Physical improvements are visible and benefit a large area of a community.
h:\ced\edn\neighborhood program\community services committee\2009\issue paper-2nd round grant applications
2009.docx
10/29/2009
Page 2
■ Demonstrated networking, self-help, and neighborhood organization.
■ Sufficient matching funds exist through volunteer labor, cash, or donated
labor/materials.
Of the 8 project grant applications, the interdepartmental Grant Review Team
recommended 6 be funded based on the above criteria.
Neighborhood
Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
Project Grant Applications
Heather Down -South Union Neighborhood Association
$3,700
$3,700
LaCrosse Homeowners Association
$3,069
$3,069
Pioneer Place Homeowners Association
$10,738
$10,738
South Renton Neighborhood Association
$339
N/A
Tiffany Park Homeowners Association
$2,865
N/A
Renton Hill Neighborhood Association
$2,300
$2,300
Victoria Park Homeowners Association
$3,968
$3,968
Winsper Homeowners Association
$2,278
$2,278
Newsletter/Administrative Grants
Cascade Neighborhood Association
$1,200
$1,200
Kennydale Neighborhood Association
$1,950
$1,950
Maplewood Gardens
$216
$216
Renton Hill Neighborhood Association
$440
$440
South Renton Connections Associating
$1,200
$1,200
Summerwind Homeowners Association
$281
$281
Total
$34,544
j $31,340
Note: The above amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.
CONCLUSION:
The Neighborhood Grant Program continues to provide neighborhood associations with
opportunities to improve their community and get to know their neighbors better.
Cc: Suzanne Dale Estey
h:\ced\edn\neighborhood program\community services committee\2009\issue paper-2nd round grant applications
2009.docx
Attachment 7MQ ATP;nhhnrhnnd Grant Prniects
Total
Grant
Project
Meets objective of
Neighborhood
Request
Cost
Project Description
Neighborhood Program
Heather
$3,700
$7,400
Install a granite stone,
Yes
Downs -South
"Heather Downs" entrance
"Call Before You Dig" a
Union
sign. Includes landscaping
must at this location
Neighborhood
around stone signage.
Sign rock must be 20' back
Association
Located at SE 2"d.
from corner.
LaCrosse
$3,069
$6,138
Expansion of an existing
Yes
Homeowners
community garden from the
Great project that services
Association
existing 10 plots to a total of
the neighborhood and the
30 plots. Each bed is 8' x 8' x
community.
10" high.
Surplus of the garden
produce will be donated to
the Salvation Army as it was
earlier this year.
Pioneer Place
$10,738
$21,476
The project consists of
Yes
Homeowners
clearing blackberries, weeds,
"Call Before You Dig" a
Association
and grass that runs
must at this location.
approximately 730 feet along
Staff recommends not using
Maple Valley Highway. Scope
"English Laurel" but use
of work consists of planting
"Otto Lukyn" instead.
29 trees, 154 bushes, 220
smaller plants and river rock
ground cover that includes an
automatic irrigation system.
South Renton
$339
$678
Develop a web site and a
No
Connections
south rentonconnection.com
The neighborhood
Association
domain registered for online
association has also applied
communication within the
for a newsletter grant in the
neighborhoods.
amount of $1,200.
Staff recommends that
monies received from the
newsletter/communications
grant be applied towards
this effort.
Tiffany Park
$2,865
$5,730
Establish an emergency
No
Homeowners
response cache for residents
While we applaud the idea
Association
of the Tiffany Park
and the efforts of an Eagle
Homeowner Association. The
Scout project, cargo
h:\ced\edn\neighborhood program\community services committee\2009\issue paper-2nd round grant applications
2009.docx
Attachment
2008 Second Round Neighborhood Grant Projects
cache would contain
containers are not allowed
emergency supplies and
to be stored on sites in this
would be housed on Tiffany
zoning destination (Code 4-
Park HOA common area/park
2-060M). Due to the
property. The project is an
location of the cache,
Eagle Scout project for a
graffiti and safety is also an
resident of the Tiffany Park
issue.
Homeowners Association.
Staff recommends that the
neighborhood association
look toward non -City
funding opportunities.
Renton Hill
$2,300
$4,600
Landscape and install solar
Yes
Neighborhood
lighting to the Renton Hill
Residents would be
Association
signs located at S.3rd St and
required to coordinate this
Mill Ave. S.
effort with Community
Services Department prior
to planting.
Victoria Park
$3,968
$7,736
Renovation of Common area
Yes
Homeowner
and landscape improvements
The project will enhance
Association
to both entrances into the
the two entrances, which
neighborhood on Talbot Road
are located on a main
S.
arterial.
Winsper
$2,278
$4,556
Placement of an entrance
Yes
Homeowners
sign into the neighborhood.
The project will improve the
Association
Entrance faces Talbot Road S.
appearance of the entrance
Improvements would
into the neighborhood and
enhance not only the
serve as a guide for the
neighborhood but the general
public as to the location of
public traveling on Talbot
Winsper.
Road.
NEWSLETTER GRANTS
Total
Neighborhood
Grant
Project
Meets objective of
Association
Request
Cost
Project Description
Neighborhood Program
Cascade
$1,200
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Neighborhood
printed and distributed by
h:\ced\edn\neighborhood program\community services committee\2009\issue paper-2nd round grant applications
2009.docx
Attachment
2008 Second Round Neighborhood Grant Projects
Association
USPS twice a year.
Kennydale
$1,950
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Neighborhood
printed and distributed by
Association
USPS & door-to-door
quarterly.
Maplewood
$216
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Gardens
printed quarterly and
distributed by USPS.
Renton Hill
$440
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Neighborhood
printed and distributed by
Association
USPS twice a year.
South Renton
$1,200
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Connections
printed quarterly and
Association
distributed by USPS.
Summerwind
$281
N/A
Annual costs for a newsletter
Yes
Homeowners
printed quarterly and
Association
distributed by USPS.
h:\ced\edn\neighborhood program\community services committee\2009\issue paper-2nd round grant applications
2009.docx
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Community & Economic
Development
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact...... Neil Watts, x-7218
Subject:
Fee Reduction for A -Frame Sign Permits
For Agenda of: November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Issue Paper Study Sessions......
Draft Ordinance Information.........
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-100J.5 (redlined)
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Planning & Development Committee Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
A -frame signs are used by many businesses to provide notice to prospective customers of their
existence and location. These signs are allowed per City code, subject to limitation on size, number,
location, and time of use. A -frame signs require an annual permit, which costs $100 per sign, per year.
The requirement for an initial permit allows the City an opportunity to explain the regulations for using
A -frame signs, as well as verifying insurance requirements and obtaining a signed hold harmless
agreement. Approximately $7,000 to $10,000 is collected annually for A -frame sign permits, which
helps cover the costs of monitoring A -frame sign usage. With the downturn in the economy, many
smaller businesses are having a difficult time remaining open, and their ability to pay the annual
renewal fee is limited, due to the need to attract customers with additional advertising methods.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve reducing permit fees for A -frame signs by allowing Renton businesses to continue use of
the A -frame sign under the initial permit fee of $100, without further annual renewal fees, and
adopt the ordinance.
"'�y 0� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
R,,
DEVELOPMENT
♦
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 30, 2009
TO: Randy Corman, President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: ' Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator Nv�
b
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Watts, Development Services Director (x-7218)
SUBJECT: Proposed Fee Reduction for A -Frame Sign Permits
ISSUE:
Should permit fees for A -frame signs be reduced or eliminated?
RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends reducing the permit fees for A -frame signs by removing the
annual renewal fee of $100. Many businesses consider the use of A -frame signs to be
important for attracting customers. However, the associated permit costs can be a
stretch for many small businesses in these difficult economic times. City staff supports
continuing to allow for reasonable use of A -frame signs, with a lesser cost impact to the
business owners.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
A -frame signs are used by many businesses to provide notice to prospective customers
of their existence and location. These signs are allowed per City code, subject to
limitation on size, number, location, and time of use. A -frame signs also require an
annual permit, which costs $100 per year for each sign. The City collects approximately
$7,000 to $10,000 annually for A -frame sign permits. This revenue helps to cover the
cost of monitoring the use of A -frame signs and correcting violations for signs outside of
the allowed size, location, etc.
With the downturn in the economy, many smaller businesses are having a difficult time
remaining open. They need the additional customer traffic associated with successful
advertising, including A -frame signs, but are limited in their ability to pay the annual
renewal fee. The requirement for the initial permit allows the City an opportunity to
A -Frame Sign Permit Fee Reduction
Page 2 of 3
October 30, 2009
explain the regulations for using A -frame signs, as well as verifying insurance
requirements and obtaining a signed hold harmless agreement.
A -frame signs currently in use have at least obtained the initial permit. We recommend
retaining a $100 permit fee for new A -frame sign permits. However, we believe a
reasonable accommodation for small businesses in these challenging economic times is
to allow them to continue use of the A -frame sign under the initial permit without
further annual renewal fees.
SUMMARY OF A -FRAME SIGN REGULATIONS:
Number: Within the City Center Sign Regulation Area, only one of these signs is
permitted per business per street frontage. Elsewhere in the City, one of these signs is
permitted per business per street frontage and, in addition, an additional sign is
permitted to be located abutting the business and building to which the sign relates.
Location Requirements: Within the City Center Sign Regulation Area, A -frame signs
must be placed against the building and business to which the sign relates. Elsewhere in
the City, A -frame signs may be located on the public sidewalk abutting the business site
and/or within the landscaping area on or abutting the business site. A -frame signs
cannot be placed in the landscape strip between the curb and outer edge of the public
sidewalk. Additionally, for businesses located within shopping centers, an additional A -
frame sign may be placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.
Pedestrian Clearance: A minimum of four feet (4') of unobstructed sidewalk area
between the outer edge of the sign and the street curb is required.
Clear Vision Area: No sign shall be located as to pose a danger and violate the clear
vision area near driveways or intersections. Where a traffic vision hazard is created, the
City may require a modification to the height or location of a sign to the degree
necessary to eliminate the hazard.
Size: Signs shall be no larger than thirty two inches (32") wide and thirty six inches (36")
tall.
Construction Specifications and Materials: The sign must be professionally
manufactured of durable material(s). No lighting or attachments, such as balloons, are
permitted.
Maintenance and Appearance: All signs shall be kept in repair and in proper state of
preservation. The surfaces of all signs shall be kept neatly painted or posted at all times.
If a sign is visible from more than one direction, all areas not intended as display
surfaces, including the back and sides, shall be designed so that such areas are given a
finished and pleasing appearance.
Alteration of Landscaping Prohibited: No landscaping may be damaged or modified to
accommodate an A -frame sign.
Removal upon Close of Business Required: A -frame signs shall not be displayed during
non -business hours.
Display of Permit and Code Requirements: Any business displaying an A -frame sign shall
have a copy of the sign permit for the sign posted along with its City business license.
A -Frame Sign Permit Fee Reduction
Page 3 of 3
October 30, 2009
Additionally, the business shall post the City's regulations governing A -frame signs so
that employees are made aware of the standards.
Display of Permit Number: All A -frame signs shall have the sign permit number a
minimum of one half inch in height placed on the exterior sign face in the upper left-
hand corner.
Proof of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement: In order to obtain an A -frame sign
permit, applicants must provide the City with proof of general commercial liability
insurance (certificate of liability insurance). The sign permit application must also
include a signed hold harmless agreement that specifies that the owner of the sign will
defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless for any loss, injuries, damage, claims or
lawsuit, including attorney's fees that arise from the sign.
Cc: Renton City Councilmembers
Denis Law, Mayor
Jay Covington, CAO
Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-1O0J.5
5. A -Frame Signs: A -frame signs complying with all the following standards may be permitted:
a. Number:
i. Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: Only one of these signs is permitted per business per
street frontage.
ii. Elsewhere in the City: One of these signs is permitted per business per street frontage and, in
addition, an additional sign is permitted to be located abutting the business and building to
which the sign relates.
b. Location Requirements:
L Permitted Location:
(1) Within City Center Sign Regulation Area: A -frame signs must be placed against the building
and business to which the sign relates.
(2) Elsewhere in the City: A -frame signs may be located on the public sidewalk abutting the
business site and/or within the landscaping area on or abutting the business site, however, A -
frame signs cannot be placed in the landscape strip between the curb and outer edge of the
public sidewalk. Additionally, for businesses located within shopping centers, an additional A -
frame sign may be placed against the building and business to which the sign relates.
ii. Pedestrian Clearance: A minimum of four feet (4') of unobstructed sidewalk area between
the outer edge of the sign and the street curb is required.
iii. Clear Vision Area: No sign shall be located as to pose a danger and violate the clear vision
area specified in subsection C6 of this Section, Prohibited Signs. Where a traffic vision hazard is
created, the City may require a modification to the height or location of a sign to the degree
necessary to eliminate the hazard.
c. Size: Signs shall be no larger than thirty two inches (32") wide and thirty six inches (36") tall.
d. Construction Specifications and Materials: The sign must be professionally manufactured of
durable material(s). No lighting or attachments, such as balloons are permitted.
e. Maintenance and Appearance: Signs must be maintained in accordance with the provisions
of subsection D3 of this section, Sign Maintenance Required, and subsection D4 of this Section,
Appearance of Signs.
f. Alteration of Landscaping Prohibited: No landscaping may be damaged or modified to
accommodate an A -frame sign. The City may require replacement of any damaged landscaping
pursuant to RMC 4-4-0701, Damaged Landscaping.
g. Removal upon Close of Business Required: A -frame signs shall not be displayed during
nonbusiness hours.
h. Display of Permit and Code Requirements: Any business displaying an A -frame sign shall have
a copy of the sign permit for the sign posted along with its City business license. Additionally
is
the usiness shall post the City's regulations governing A -frame signs so that employees are
made aware of the standards.
i. Display of Permit Number: All A -frame signs shall have the sign permit number a minimum of
one half inch in height placed on the exterior sign face in the upper left-hand corner by the
permittee.
j. Proof of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement for Signs on Public Right -of -Way: In order to
obtain a sign permit, applicants must provide the Development Services Division with proof of
general commercial liability insurance (certificate of liability insurance) meeting the
requirements of subsection L4 of this Section. The sign permit application must also include a
signed hold harmless agreement that specifies that the owner of the sign will defend,
indemnify, and hold the City harmless for any loss, injuries, damage, claims or lawsuit, including
attorney's fees that arise from the sign.
k. Confiscation of Signs: Signs that do not comply with the provisions of this section may be
confiscated by the City pursuant to subsection T of this Section, Compliance and Confiscation of
Signs. (Ord. 4832, 3-6-2000)
I. Permit Required: The N ri9d qfvakdity fe - aR ^ `AGE e ig;;p^�:n;t is tv�21re (, 2) ,+hr A
permit required for each A -frame sign and remains valid indefinitely for the business using the
sign . (Ord. 4908, 6-11-2001)
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-1-14OM
M. SIGN PERMIT FEES:
3. TEMPORARY AND PORTABLE SIGNS:
Fee Amount
Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant
to RMC 4-4-100J2
$50.00 per sign, permit valid for a 12-month period
Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to
RMC 4-4-100J6d(1)
$25.00 per site, per opening
Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-
100J6d(2) and (3)
$15.00 per type of sign identified in RMC 4-4-100J6b,
per promotion
A -Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-
100J5
$100.00 for the first sign and $50.00 for each
additional sign, .
Commercial Property Real Estate Banner
$50.00 per sign, permit valid for a 12-month period
Decorative Flags
$50.00 per entrance, permit valid until flag(s)
removed
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
Subject:
2010 Fee Schedule
Exhibits:
Finance & IT Department
Iwen Wang, Administrator
Issue Paper
Proposed Ordinances and Fee Schedule
Al #: I. h.
For Agenda of: November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Repeal various fee amounts from the City Code and establish a consolidated Fee Schedule to be
published and on file with the City Clerk's office. The Fee Schedule currently consists of
primarily discretionary service fees, will be expanded to include other fees and charges as
appropriate, to form a single consolidated fee schedule of all City fees and charges. The intent is
to bring the Fee Schedule to Council for annual review and approval in conjunction with City's
budget process to ensure they are current and appropriate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Proposed Fee Schedule ordinances to establish the 2010 miscellaneous fees.
C:\Documents and Settings\BWalton\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\X7DZYUNA\2010 Fee schedule AgB IP (2).doc
FINANCE AND
INFORMATION SERVICES
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
November 2, 2009
TO:
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:
`j
,~�J� - Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:
Iwen Wang, FIT Administrator
SUBJECT:
Proposed 2010 Fee Schedule
ISSUE
Should the City adopt a consolidated Fee Schedule for various miscellaneous fees currently in the
Renton Municipal Code?
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of a consolidated Fee Schedule.
BACKGROUND
The City charges various user fees to defray the costs of providing these services. Currently
these fees are codified in various titles, chapters, and sections in the Renton Municipal Code
(Code), which make it difficult to consistently review and update these fees as necessary.
Some of these fees have not been reviewed or updated since the 1990's and some are no
longer consistent with current law or practice.
This is the first step of a two-year process. The proposed Fee Schedule will simplify and
consolidate mostly the discretionary service fees and charges (vs. mandatory fees such as
building permits and land use fees) currently contained in Title V of the Code. We will be
reviewing fees and charges in other sections of the Code, and if appropriate, incorporate them
into the Fee Schedule for a complete consolidated Fee Schedule in 2010. Once completed, it
will also provide a convenient, single source of all City fees and charges to the public who seeks
the information.
Cc: Jay Covington, CAO
Marty Wine, Assistant CAO
Administrators
C:\Documents and Settings\BWalton\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\X7DZYUNA\2010 Fee schedule AgB IP.doc
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REPEALING FEES CONTAINED IN SECTIONS 5-1-2, 5-1-4, 5-1-5, 5-1-6,
5-1-7 AND 5-1-8 OF CHAPTER 1 (FEE SCEDULE) OF TITLE V
(FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO.
3774, 3887, 3933, 4257, 4267, 4298, 4639, 4741, 4789, 4852, 4886, 4953, 5011,
5023, 5025, 5053, 5067, 5113, 5114, 5126, 5127, 5130, 5145, 5178, 5248, 5258,
5276, 5321 AND 5433 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" AND AUTHORIZE THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF FEE SCHEDULE BY RESOLUTION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 5-1-2, 5-1-4, 5-1-5, 5-1-6 and 5-1-7 of Chapter 1, Title V
of Renton Municipal Code is hereby repealed. All fees and charges in this Chapter shall be
reviewed and approved annually in conjunction with the City's budget process through the
adoption of a Fee Schedule Resolution.
SECTION H. Subsection 5-1-8 of Chapter 1, Title V of Renton Municipal Code
is hereby amended:
5-1-8 AIRPORT FUEL FLOWAGE FEES: . ---- f Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5"
A. Aviation Fuel Flowage Fees: Wholesale fuel distributors of aviation fuel shall pay to the City of
Renton a per gallon fuel flowage fee as set forth in the City's fee schedule E for fuel delivered to any --.- Deleted: of $0.06 per gallon ofJetA
location at the Renton Municipal Airport with all of the revenue deposited in the Airport Fund that pays and 100LL
for the operation and maintenance of the Airport.
B. Reporting: Wholesale fuel distributors of aviation fuel shall, on the last day of each month,
provide to the City of Renton a fuel flowage fee report, and a copy of each invoice for aviation fuel
distributed at the Renton Municipal Airport, for the subject month.
C. Violations and Penalties:
1. Failure to pay the fuel flowage fee or to provide the required fuel flowage fee report and
supporting invoices shall be a violation of this section. Any violation of this section shall be a civil
infraction.
2. Any person found to have violated this section by failing to pay the fuel flowage fee shall
pay a fine equal to 5% of the fuel flowage fee owed to the City of Renton multiplied by the number of
months said fuel flowage fee was unpaid.
3. Any person found to have violated this section by failing to provide the report or supporting
documentation for the fuel flowage fee shall pay a fine of $100.00. For any subsequent offense in a 12-
month period, the fine shall be $200.00.
4. Any person found to have violated this section three times or more in a 12-month
period shall be prohibited from delivering aviation fuel to any recipient located on the Renton
Municipal Airport for a period of 6 months. (Ord. 5433, 12-8-08)
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2010.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Title V Business
CHAPTER 1
FEESCHEDULE
SECTION:
5-1-1: Fee Schedule Adopted (Rep. by Ord. 4723)
5-1-2: Charges For Instruments, Reports, Codes And Services(repeal, replace with fee
schedule resolution)
5-1-3: Refunding Land Use Fees (Rep. by Ord. 4723)
5-14: Fines For False Alarms (repeal, replace with fee schedule resolution)
5-1-5: Golf Course Fees (repeal, replace with fee schedule resolution)
5-1-6: City Center Garage Parking Fees (repeal, replace with fee schedule resolution)
5-1-7: Aquatic Center Admission Fees (repeal, replace with fee schedule resolution)
5-1-8: Airport Fuel Flowage Fees
5-1-1 FEE SCHEDULE ADOPTED:
(Rep. by Ord. 4723, 5-11-98)
5-1-2 CHARGES FOR INSTRUMENTS, REPORTS, CODES AND SERVICES:
x-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-1-3 REFUNDING LAND USE FEES:
(Rep. by Ord. 4723, 5-11-98)
C5-1-4.....
5-1-5
5-1-6
5-1-7
x------
FINES FOR FALSE ALARMS
------------------------------------------------
GOLF COURSE FEES:
CITY CENTER GARAGE PARKING FEES:
-------------------------------------------------------------
AQUATIC CENTER ADMISSION FEES:
---------------------------------------------------------
Deleted: The following charges are
hereby established by the City which
shall be collected for the following
instruments, reports, codes and services:
(Ord.3774, 12-19-83)1
A.. Maps:¶
Zoning maps - standard size 1
Deleted: Schedule of Fines for False
--------- - Alarms .. 2
--------_----- Deleted: A. - Green Fees: The cost of
golf course green fees shall be as follows:¶
- Effective through April 1, 2009:1
18 Hole/Weekday .. 3
Deleted: A. - Short-Term/Retail
Parking: Parking rates for retail parking
------------------------------------------ will be as follows:¶
Deleted: Admission for the Aqu�Jl
Center shall be as follows:¶
5-1-8 AIRPORT FUEL FLOWAGE FEES:
A. Aviation Fuel Flowage Fees: Wholesale fuel distributors of aviation fuel shall pay to the City of
Renton a per gallon fuel flowage fee as set forth in the Citv's fee schedule E for fuel delivered to _any
location at the Renton Municipal Airport with all of the revenue deposited in the Airport Fund that pays
for the operation and maintenance of the Airport.
B. Reporting: Wholesale fuel distributors of aviation fuel shall, on the last day of each month,
provide to the City of Renton a fuel flowage fee report, and a copy of each invoice for aviation fuel
distributed at the Renton Municipal Airport, for the subject month.
C. Violations and Penalties:
1. Failure to pay the fuel flowage fee or to provide the required fuel flowage fee report and
supporting invoices shall be a violation of this section. Any violation of this section shall be a civil
infraction.
2. Any person found to have violated this section by failing to pay the fuel flowage fee shall
pay a fine equal to 5% of the fuel flowage fee owed to the City of Renton multiplied by the number of
months said fuel flowage fee was unpaid.
3. Any person found to have violated this section by failing to provide the report or supporting
documentation for the fuel flowage fee shall pay a fine of $100.00. For any subsequent offense in a 12-
month period, the fine shall be $200.00.
4. Any person found to have violated this section three times or more in a 12-month
period shall be prohibited from delivering aviation fuel to any recipient located on the Renton
Municipal Airport for a period of 6 months. (Ord. 5433, 12-8-08)
Deleted: of $0.06 per gallon of JetA
and 100LL
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDIGN CHAPTER 4 (ANIMAL LICENSE) OF TITLE V (FINANCE
AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 3773, 4223,
4446, 4739, 4806, AND 5356 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" AND
WITH PUBLISHED FEE SCHEDULES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Chapter 4, Title V of Renton Municipal Code is hereby amended
as follows:
,5-4-1 ... REQUIRED_AGE FOR LICENSING:
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times
New Roman, it pt
Deleted: A..
Deleted: The
Deleted: fees for a
Deleted: two-year
It shall be unlawful to own or keep a dog or cat of more than four (4) months of age within the City Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 +
unless the owner or custodian thereof shall have a valid animal license for each such animal. A violation Numbering Style: A, s, C, ... + Start
of this section shall constitute a civil infraction punishable by a fine of up to $250, not including costs. at: i + Alignment: Left + Aligned at:
(Ord. 3773 12-19-83 eff. 1-1-84; amd. Ord. 4916, 9-10-01) 0.5" +lab after: o^ +Indent at:
> > 4�;;� 0.75"
5-4-2 ANNUAL FEES, SPECIAL RATES FOR SENIOR CITIZENS; BLIND PERSONS Deleted: annual animal license
WITH SEEING EYE DOGS: Deleted: follows
(Ord. 3773, 12-19-83, eff. 1-1-84) Deleted::¶
A. All animal licenses issued after January 1. 2010 shall be renewed annually upon the payment oft ; Each dog (not altered) .
applicable fees as -set forth in the Citv's fee schedule published and on tile with the CIV
Clerk's office.
B. For licenses issued prior to January 1 2010 the renewal date shall be prior to the expiration of ;
current license,• upon which time the new license will be converted to annual license.
� resi
B.
-- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
B. City dents sixty two (62) years of age or older, if income qualified as set forth in Section 8-5-
15D and E and Section 8-4-31C of the City Code, shall be entitled to purchase a special permanent animal
license, Such
_qualified senior citizens shall not be required_to annually purchase a new license for the
-------------------------------------- ------- - - -------------- --- - - -
lifetime of such licensed animals; provided, that no person so qualified shall be granted more than three
(3) permanent licenses for any combination of three (3) cats and dogs for which they are the registered
owners.
C. Residents of the City who are the owners or custodians of seeing eye dogs shall be exempt from
the payment of the annual license fees for said dogs. For the purpose of this Chapter the term "blind
person" shall mean a person who has no vision or whose vision, with correcting glasses, is so defective as
to prevent the performance of ordinary activities for which eyesight is essential, and who is the owner or
custodian of a seeing eye dog to assist such person. Such qualified person shall be eligible to receive from
the Finance Director a license for such dog without any charge therefor. The Finance Director shall
require proper evidence of such eligibility as further set forth in RCW 74.16.030, et seq. Such license
shall not be transferable and shall be specifically marked for such seeing eye dog. (Ord. 3773, 12-19-83,
eff. 1-1-84)
D. All applications for such licenses shall be made to the Finance and Information Services
Deleted: $20.00
Deleted: As set forth in the City
miscellaneous fee schedule¶
Each dog (altered) .
Deleted: 10.00
Deleted: As set forth in the in the City
miscellaneous fee schedule¶
Each cat (not altered) -
Deleted: 8.00
Deleted: As set forth in the City
miscellaneous fee schedule¶
Each cat (altered) .
Deleted: 4,50
Deleted: As set forth in the City
miscellaneous fee schedule¶
(Ord. 4446, 4-4-94; amd Ord. 4739, 9-
14-98; Ord 4806, 10-25-99, eff. 1-1-00)
Deleted: Eligible residents may
purchase the special permanent animal
licenses at a cost according to the
Deleted: fee schedule as above listed
Deleted: City miscellaneous fee
schedule
Administrator and the _annual license fees shall be paid upon receipt of a renewal- notice. -In-the-event the___--.-
owner or custodian of any such dog or cat fails to procure and fails to pay for such license fee at or before
the renewal date, or within thirty (30) days of acquiring the ownership or custody of any such dog or cat,
a late charge , shall be added to the regular license_ fee_ The City may require reasonable evidence to
determine the date of acquisition or custody of any such dog or cat to ascertain whether a late charge shall
be imposed. (Ord. 4223, 7-3-89; amd. Ord. 4739, 9-14-98)
E. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to permit the City's animal control officer, or any other
custodian of animals impounded pursuant to the provisions of the City Code, and any duly licensed
veterinarian practicing his profession within the City to sell and issue licenses. The Finance Director may
impose such additional regulations as may be reasonable to carry out the provisions of this Chapter. The
Finance Director is hereby authorized to provide, by appropriate designation, the special permanent
licenses for qualified senior citizens as hereinabove set forth. (Ord. 3773, 12-19-83, eff. 1-1-84)
5-4-3 APPLICATION; TAG:
Said license shall be obtained by making application to the Finance Director, or as otherwise provided
for herein, upon forms approved and provided by the Finance Director and upon payment of the required
fee; thereupon the license tag, in such form as may be approved by the Finance Director, will be issued to
the applicant and said tag shall be attached firmly and securely to the collar worn at all times by the dog
so licensed. In the event such tag has been lost or stolen, then the owner or custodian of such dog shall
make prompt application unto the Finance Director for a duplicate tag and such duplicate tag shall be
issued by the Finance Director upon payment ofa duplicate 1 a fee)_ (Amd. Ord._4806, 10-25-99,_eff._ 1-1_
00)
54-4 DEFINITIONS -
For the purpose of this Chapter, "owner" shall mean any person, firm or corporation owning, having
an interest in, right of possession to, control, custody or possession of such an animal.
54-5 WHEN PROVISIONS NONAPPLICABLE:
The provisions relating to the licensing of animals shall not apply to such animals in the temporary
custody of a veterinarian, or whose owners are bona fide nonresidents temporarily residing or visiting
within the City. (Ord. 3773, 12-19-83, eff. 1-1-84)
Deleted: two-year
Deleted: of ten dollars ($10.00)
Deleted: as set forth in the City
miscellaneous fee schedule
- Deleted. the sum of five dollars ($5.00
5-4-6 ADDITIONAL ANIMALS:
The keeping of additional animals may be allowed pursuant to RMC 4-9-100. Application shall be made
to the Planning Division. Upon approval of the issuance of an Additional Animals Permit by the Planning
Director, the Finance Director shall be authorized to issue a license to keep additional animals to the
applicant. The Additional AnimalsPermit shall be -renewed annually upon payment of the required ;_ Deleted: additional
renewal fee and provided Animal Control and/or the Planning Division has not revoked the permit Deleted: animals
pursuant to RMC 4-9-100I. The first -year license fee shall be waived for those who receive an Additional Deleted: license
Animals Permit. (Ord. 5356, 2-25-08, eff. 3-6-08; amd. Ord. 5470, 7-13-09) Deleted: receipt ofthe fifty dollar
($50.00)
SECTION EL This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2010.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, t ----- Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left:
WASHINGTON, ESTALISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR VARIOUS 1.13", Right: 0.75"
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES FOR 2010.
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has determined that certain service fees established
in the Renton Municipal Code should be centralized and incorporated into a single resolution to
be updated on a regular basis; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance _ to repeal those fees currently
specified in the Renton Municipal Code which would be replaced by this Resolution;
WHEREAS, the City Council has referred the Fee Schedule to the Finance Committee to
review and recommend any changes;
WHEREAS, the Finance Committee has recommended that the fees and charges be set
at levels as listed in the attached Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAINAS FOLLOWS: --------_---------
SECTION I. Effective Date. Effectively January 1, 2010, the fees and charges
attached herein as Exhibit A are hereby adopted.
SECTION II. Severability/Savings If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of
this Resolution or any resolution adopted or amended hereby should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall
not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of
this resolution.
Deleted: DO RESOLVE
SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2010.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Exhibit A: 2010 Fee Schedule
Page,3:: [ij.Deleted.:;: iwang 10/24/2009 12:31p00 Pm::.
The following charges are hereby established by the City which shall be collected for the
following instruments, reports, codes and services: (Ord. 3774, 12-19-83)
A. Maps:
Zoning maps - standard size
$5.00 each
Precinct maps - large size
2.50 each
Comprehensive Plan map
2.00 each
(Ord. 3887, 2-4-85; amd. Ord. 4789, 8-16-99)
B. Plat:
First page
1$1.00
Each additional page
10.50
(Ord. 3774, 12-19-83)
C. Photostatic Copies:
Up to ten (10) pages free. After first ten (10) pages all pages, including the first ten (10), will be
charged as follows:
Per 8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" black -and-
$0.15
white single -sided page
Per 11" x 17" single -sided page
0.20
Per color 8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" single-
0.25
sided page
(Ord. 3774, 12-19-83; Ord. 4267, 4-23-90; amd. Ord. 4639, 10-28-96; Ord. 5113, 12-20-04)
D. Audio or Video Recording Copies:
1. Audio recording, each copy 1$10.00
2. Video recording, each coy 115.00
(Ord. 4953, 2-4-02; amd. Ord. 5113, 12-20-04)
E. Regulations and Plans:
Comprehensive Plan and Ma $15.00
Title 4, Development Regulations
Text and Zoning Ma
55.00
Text Only
150.00
Individual Chapters of Development Regulations:
Chapter 1, Administration And Enforcement
(includes development fees)
3.00
Chapter 2, Land Use District Regulations (includes
Chapter
one -related use restrictions and development
standards)
10.00
ter 3, Environmental Regulations And Special
15.00
(includes wetland, shoreline, flood
regulations, etc.)
Shoreline Master Program only (includes policies)
.00
Chapter 4, Property Development Standards
(includes sign, azking, landscaping regulations, etc.)
7.00
Grading, Excavation And Mining Regulations only
/C
Parkin Regulations only
.00
Sign Code only
.00
Chapter 5, Building And Fire Prevention Standards
3.00
Chapter 6, Street And Utility Standards
3.00
Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations
.00
Chapter 8, Permits, Decisions And Appeals
.00
Chapter 9, Procedures
5.00
Chapter 10, Nonconforming Uses, Structures And
Lots
/C
Chapter 11, Definitions.00
Renton Municipal Code (two volumes) 00.00
Code Supplements, per year:Titles
1 - 3 and 5 - 10
35.00
Title 4
35.00
(Ord. 4267, 4-23-90; amd. Ord. 4741, 10-5-98; Ord. 4789, 8-16-99; Ord. 4953, 2-4-02)
F. Miscellaneous Services:
(Ord. 3933, 8-26-85; amd. Ord. 4741, 10-5-98; Ord. 4953, 2-4-02; Ord. 5145, 6-13-05)
G. Budget:The sum for each copy of the City's budget except that no such charge shall be
made for any copy of the City's annual budget when requested by any other municipality or
quasi -municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization5.00 each
(Ord. 3774, 12-19-83; amd. Ord. 4953, 2-4-02)
H. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services:
Districts
Certification and Notary Fees -Clerk's
Certification
5.00
Notary Public Attestation or
Acknowledgement or as otherwise provided
for in RCW 42.28.090
3.00 per instrument
(signature)
Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar
document not otherwise provided for
10.00 each
Charge for fingerprint cards for employment
clearance, governmental service, passport
application, immigration and related matters
2.00 per set not to
exceed two (2) cards or
documents per person
Lamination of Licenses, Pictures 3.00
Review of Shopping Cart Containment and
Retrieval Plans
100.00
Police Re orts (1 - 10 pages)
$ 5.00
Over 10 pages to 20 pages
15.00
ver 20 pages
25.00
Certification of Copy of Report
.00
Notarized Copy of Report
.00
Record Checks (Written Response)
.00
Letters of Clearance
.00
Photographs (Blk/Whi or Color)/each
.00
Fingerprint Cards (not classified)
.00
ach additional card
1.00
Miscellaneous Special Requests
.00
Daily Charge for Walk -In Commitment
00
(Ord. 4298, I1-26-90; amd. Ord. 4852, 8-7-00; Ord. 4953, 2-4-02)
I. Charizes for Documents: (Fire Department)
Fire Incident Report
.00 per report
Aid Incident Report
.00 per report
Fire Inspection Report
.00 per report
Fire Investigative Report
.00 per report
Photo gra hs and Prints:
Prints
First Copy
lack and White
6.00 each
Color
7.00 each
dditional Copy
lack and White
iR.50 each
1
Color
0.50 each
(Ord. 3774, 12-19-83; amd. Ord. 4953, 2-4-02)
I Computer Listings:
City of Renton new business list
$ 5.00
List of all business licenses
.00
Facsimile Copies:
Copies requested by outside parties (local fax
umber)
Copies requested by outside parties (long distance
fax number)
1- 2 pages
o charge
F--5
3 - 5 pages
1$5.00 (minimum)
- 10 pages (10 page limit)
1$1.00 per page
(Ord. 4257, 1-22-90; Ord. 4267, 4-23-90; amd. Ord. 4741, 10-5-98; Ord. 4953, 2-4-02; Ord.
5113, 12-20-04)
K. Utility Fees:
Special Request Water Meter
Reading
$30.00
Utility New Account Setup
$25.00
Utility Billing Account Transfer
$5.00
Water Utility Outstanding Balance
Search Requested By Fax,
Messenger or Letter
$25.00
(Ord. 5126, 2-28-05; amd. Ord. 5127, 2-28-05; Ord. 5276, 4-16-07)
Pane 3e f21 Deleted Twang 10/24/2009 12:31:00 PM
Schedule of Fines for False Alarms
Amount
First, second and third false alarms
no charge
Fourth and fifth false alarms in a registration year
(January 1 through December 31 each year)
$ 50.00/each
Sixth false alarm and successive false alarms in a
registration year
(January 1 through December 31 each ear)
100.00/each
Registration Fee (One time only fee) per owner
0.00
Late Registration Penalty
50.00
Late False Alarm Payment Penalty
25.00
eal Hearing Cancellation Fee
10.00
(Ord. 4852, 8-7-00)
Page 3.: [3] Deleted Twang 10/24/2009 12:31:00 PM
A. Green Fees: The cost of golf course green fees shall be as follows:
Effective through April 1, 2009:
18 Hole/Weekda $29.00
18 Hole/Weekend 1$33.00
9 Hole/Weekday 1$19.00
9 Hole/Weekend 1$19.00
18 Hole/Senior/Weekday
Isig.00
9 Hole/Senior/Weekday
1$15.00
18 Hole/Junior/Weekday
1$16.00
9 Hole/Junior/Weekday
$12.00
Effective January 1, 2009:
Club Rental 1 $15.00
Effective after A ril 1, 2009:
18 Hole/Weekday 1$29.00
18 Hole/Weekend 1$35.00
9 Hole/Weekday $20.00
9 Hole/Weekend 1$20.00
18 Hole/Senior/Weekday $20.00
9 Hole/Senior/Week da $15.00
18 Hole/Junior/Weekday $16.00
9 Hole/Junior/Weekday 1$12.00
For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
"Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week.
B. Golf Cart Fees:
18 Hole fee 1$24.00
9 Hole fee 1$14.00
C. Driving Range Fees:
Large Bucket
$7.00
Small Bucket
$4.00
(New) Warm-up Bucket
$2.00
D. Lesson Fees:
1/2 Hour Private
$40.00
1 Hour Private
$60.00
1/2 Hour Series Private
$140.00
1 Hour Series Private
$220.00
Group Series
$90.00
(Ord. 4886, 12-18-00; amd. Ord. 5025, 11-17-03; Ord. 5178, 12-12-05; Ord. 5248, 12-11-06;
Ord. 5321, 11-26-07; Ord. 5426, 11-17-08)
Page 3:.[4] Deleted' Twang 10/24/200912:31:00 PM
A. Short-Term/Retail Parking: Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows:
0 - 2 hours: Free
2 - 4 hours: $2.00
4 - 6 hours: $4.00
6+ hours: $6.00
Retail parkers will register their space number and pay for parking at pay stations located
in the garage first -floor lobbies.
B. Discounted Rate: A discounted rate for parking in the long-term, card -accessed areas of
the garage and in City surface parking lots will be provided for any person or entity who lease(s)
three or more parking space(s) for at least a six-month period. The fees will be as follows:
1. The following group rates will apply, except as provided below.
$30.00/month per stall for leases of 3 to 50 stalls.
$20.00/month per stall for leases of the 51 st to 100th stalls.
For leasing of 101 stalls or more, the fee schedule shall be identical to the Metro fee
schedule, as shown in subsection B2 of this Section.
If a customer needs a replacement card because he/she either lost his/her card or
broke it, he/she will be charged a $20.00 replacement fee. The Finance Department will be able to
waive this fee for good cause, such as a broken card due to ordinary wear and tear.
2. King County Metro Discounted Rate: The discounted rate for parking in the long-
term, card -accessed areas of the garage that have been leased to King County Metro will be as
follows:
$10.00/month per stall for 100 stalls.
$15.00/month per stall for leasing of the 101 st to 200th stall.
$20.00/month for each stall from the 201 st to the 261 st stall.
$20.00/month for all stalls when the lease exceeds 261 stalls. (Ord. 5011, 6-2-03; amd.
Ord. 5023, 11-3-03; Ord. 5114, 12-20-04)
Page 3: [5] Deleted Twang 10/24/2009.12,32:00 PM
Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows:
Regular
Twilight
Season
Session
Sesssion
Pass
Resident Infants (under 1 year):
Free
Free
Free
Nonresident Infants (under 1 year):
Free
Free
Free
Resident Youth, 1 - 4:
$2.00
$1.25
$20.00
Nonresident Youth, 1 - 4:
$4.00
$2.50
$33.00
Resident Youth, 5 - 12:
$5.00
$3.50
$50.00
Nonresident Youth, 5 - 12:
$8.00
$4.75
$83.00
Resident Teen, 13 - 17:
$6.00
$3.75
$62.00
Nonresident Teen, 13 - 17:
$9.00
$6.00
$110.00
Resident Adult, 18 - 49:
$7.00
$4.75
$75.00
Nonresident Adult, 18 - 49:
$14.00
$8.50
$165.00
Resident Senior (50 and up):
$6.00
$3.50
$62.00
Nonresident Senior (50 and up):
$8.00
$4.75
$83.00
Resident Lap Swim/Water Walking Only:
$3.00
$3.00
$37.00
Nonresident Lap Swim/Water Walking Only:
$4.40
$4.40
$55.00
Resident Family Rate*:
n/a
n/a
$175.00
Nonresident Family Rate*:
n/a
n/a
$330.00
*A family is defined as a group of four of which at least one, but not -more than two, are
adults. The family season pass card rate is based on a family of four persons. A flat rate
of $25.00 will be charged for each additional family member. All persons must reside at
the same address.
Group Rates* Regular Session Twilight Session
Resident Rates: $6.00 per person $3.50 per person •
Nonresident Rates: $10.00 per person $6.00 per person
* 1. For groups of 10 or more.
2. Must be scheduled in advance.
3. Guaranteed admission.
4. The number of groups may be limited each day.
5. Must have the appropriate ratio of chaperones.
6. Staff has the authority to offer discounted daily rates for partial sessions or Renton -
only events.
Locker Rental $ 0.25
Canopy Rental Fees (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session)
Henry Moses Party Tent #1 (10' x 20' for up to 25 guests):
Resident Rate, per session:
Nonresident Rate, per session:
$155.00
$190.00
Henry Moses Party Tent #2 (10' x 10' for up to 15 guests):
Resident Rate: $105.00
Nonresident Rate: $130.00
Swim Lesson Program
Resident swim session fee: $44.00
Nonresident swim session fee: $60.80
Swim sessions consist of eight lessons. For those sessions that may be shorter than eight
lessons the fee will be $5.50 per lesson for residents and $7.60 per lesson for nonresidents.
End -of -Year School Party Rentals
Number of Students: Renton S.D. 403: All other schools/school districts:
001 - 299 $1,675 $2,211
300 - 399 $2,010 $2,662
400 - 499 $2,180 $2,888
500 - 599 $2,345 $3,113
All -Inclusive Rentals
$1,128.00 for a 2-hour rental
(Ord. 5053, 12-15-03; amd. Ord. 5067, 4-19-04; Ord. 5130, 4-4-05; Ord. 5258, 2-12-07)
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. Hearing Examiner
Staff Contact...... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515
Subject:
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No. LUA-09-024, PPUD, PP, ECF, LLA
Exhibits:
Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation,
Zoning Map and Vicinity Map
Ordinance
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Al #:
For Agenda of:
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution ............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
11 /09/2009
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
K11
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The hearing was held on August 25, 2009. The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the
Springbrook Ridge PUD was published on September 24, 2009. The appeal period ended on October 8,
2009. No appeals were filed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Springbrook Ridge Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat as outlined in the
Examiner's Report and Recommendation and adopt the Ordinance.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
Minutes
APPLICANT:
CONTACT:
LOCATION:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT:
September 24, 2009
Alex Cugini, Robert Cugini, Crissa Cugini, and Cathy Cugini
PO Box 359
Renton, WA 98057
Alex Cugini,
c/o Century Pacific
1201 Third Avenue, Ste. 1680
Seattle, WA 98101
Katherine Laird
Century Pacific
1201 Third Avenue, Ste. 1680
Seattle, WA 98101
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
SE 172"d St. and Benson Rd S and Benson Drive
Requesting Preliminary Planned Urban Development, for a
mixed -use development including office, retail and residential
uses. In addition, the applicant has requested a Lot Line
Adjustment.
Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to
conditions.
The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner
on August 18, 2009.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining
available information on file with the application, field checking
the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a
public hearing on the subject as follows:
MINUTES
The following minutes area summary of the August 25, 2009 hearing.
The legal record is recorded on CD.
The hearing opened on Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 9:29 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of
the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affumed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 2
Exhibit No. 1: Project file containing the original
application, proof of posting, proof of publication and
other documentation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map
Exhibit No. 3: Topographic Survey
Exhibit No. 4: Lot Line Adjustment
Exhibit No. 5: Site Plan
Exhibit No. 6: Parking Lot Landscape Plan
Exhibit No. 7: Tree Inventory Plan
Exhibit No. 8: Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit No. 9: Conceptual Drainage Control Plan
Exhibit No. 10: Conceptual Utility Plan
Exhibit No. 11: Landscape Plan, Sheet L1
Exhibit No. 12: Landscape Plan, Sheet L2
Exhibit No. 13: Landscape Plan, Sheet L3
Exhibit No. 14: Stream Buffer Averaging &
Enhancement Plan, Sheet SB 1
Exhibit No. 15: Stream Buffer Averaging &
Enhancement Plan, Sheet SB2
Exhibit No.16: Stream Buffer Averaging &
Enhancement Plan, Sheet SB3
Exhibit No. 17: Stream Crossing Culvert
Exhibit No.18. Image of Arch Culvert
Exhibit No. 19: Building "A" Floor Plan
Exhibit No. 20: Building "A" Floor and Roof Plans
Exhibit No. 21: Building Elevations, Sheet A103
Exhibit No. 22: Building Elevations, Sheet A104
Exhibit No. 23: Site Sections
Exhibit No. 24: Building `B" Site Section Parking &
Retail Floor Plan
Exhibit No. 25: Building `B" Typical Office Floor
Plan & Retail Floor Plan
Exhibit No. 26: Retail Elevations, Sheet A107
Exhibit No. 27: Building Elevations, color, Sheet
A103
Exhibit No. 28: Building Elevations, color, Sheet
A104
Exhibit No. 29: Building Elevations, color, Sheet
A107
The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Vanessa Dolbee Associate Planner, Community and
Economic Development Department, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The
applicant has requested a Preliminary Planned Urban Development that includes office, retail and residential uses
in addition to a lot line adjustment. The project site is comprised of two lots, Parcel A and Parcel B. The site is
located in the CA zone and the Commercial Land Use designation in the Benson Hill area. The site is surrounded
on all sides by roads and is located at the intersection of Benson Drive S (State Route 515) and Benson Road, on
the north it is bordered by SE 172nd Street. The site is further surrounded by commercial, residential and multi-
family residential uses.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 3
The lot line adjustment would change the sizes of the two lots, Lot 1 would become 1.98 acres and would house
the residential building and would have a net density of 50.26 dwelling units per acre. Lot 2 would contain the
commercial building and would become 1.8 acres.
Some critical areas have been identified on the site and consist of some regulated slopes, medium coal mine
hazards and a Class 4 Stream, which runs through the center of the site. The slopes are not protected slopes.
The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated with 15 mitigated
measures. No appeals were filed.
The residential building would be 4-stories (46-feet high). It would contain 107,723 gross square feet with an
underground parking garage with 59 spaces and an associated surface parking lot with 63 spaces to the east of the
building.
The commercial building would contain 35, 552 gross square feet with approximately8,900 square feet of retail
and 17,800 square feet of office space. The parking garage would contain 23 parking spaces with an associated
surface parking with 36 parking spaces. There would be an additional parking lot north of the stream on the
eastern side of the site that is a joint use parking lot that has 35 spaces that can be utilized by either the office
and/or the residential development.
There are 6 separate access locations for the parking garages or surface parking. There is one enter only access
that crosses the stream into the joint use parking. lot. There are three access points from SE 172"d Street, two
would be directly to the underground parking and one for the surface parking. The applicants have further
proposed a vehicular stream crossing that runs through the center of the site, which would add connectivity to the
commercial and residential. This stream crossing would be necessary for site circulation.
There is also pedestrian access and circulation throughout the site that is provided in several ways. The applicants
have proposed a self-service pedestrian trail as an amenity that would run off State Rt. 515 going south of the
residential building, along the stream and that would be partially in the stream buffer and would connect to the
bridge area on the north side of the stream and further connects to pedestrian crosswalks and pathways through the
parking lot enabling people to reach either the commercial building or the residential building. Sidewalks
throughout the site further connect to street frontages.
There was a discussion regarding modifications that can and cannot be made under the PUD ordinance.
The proposed Springbrook Ridge PUD complies with the City of Renton Development Standards including
Chapter 4.2 zoning districts uses and standards, Chapter 4.3.100 urban design regulations with the exception of
Table A, Chapter 4.4 citywide property development standards and Chapter 4.6.060 street standards.
Vanessa then went through the modifications of the Renton Municipal Code requested by the applicant that are.
listed in Table A of the Staff Report. These include the requests for 59 underground parking spaces within the
residential building and 63 surface parking spaces for the multi -family building. Rather than a residential building
with ground floor commercial, the applicant has requested to have the residential building be a stand-alone
building, the maximum number of compact parking spaces to be increased from 30% to 34%, the refuse and
recycle area be reduced to 403.00 square feet from the required 436.5 square feet, the restrictions of critical areas
regarding the removal of trees, the applicant would be allowed to modify the number of trees, they have requested
to remove 35 trees which would be in the vicinity of the vehicular crossing.
The Modifications requested for the Design District D included permitting the front entry of the building to face
the parking areas, a primary entrance of each building would be located in a visual prominent location, connected
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 4
to the street by sidewalks to the public sidewalk, standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection,
and utility areas would be enclosed on all sides and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence, pedestrian
overhead weather protection would be provided on commercial buildings in the form of awnings, marquees,
canopies, or building overhangs. The last item, RMC 4-3-100H.2.d should be stricken from the record.
Regarding the PUD criteria, if the conditions of approval are met, the applicant will have demonstrated
compliance with the PUD regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant will have demonstrated that the
development is superior to that which would result without a PUD and will not be detrimental to surrounding
properties. Public Benefits would include the enhancement or rehabilitation of natural features on the subject
property, provides a planned urban development design that is superior in one or more aspects, including open
space, landscaping, and site and building design.
Under tree retention, the applicant would be required to retain 15 trees, the applicant has identified 35 trees to be
retained. The circulation proposed is above and beyond requirements. Interior paths should be made of different
material than the parking lot surface material.
The landscaping around the residential building and along NE 172"d Street that the applicant has provided is
generously -sized with a minimum of 15-feet. This would provide screening and buffering for the parking lot but
would also enhance the look of the site along the intersection of Benson Road and Benson Drive. They have
further proposed native plantings along the stream corridor and the removal of invasive weeds within that area.
The proposed plan did not include landscaping along the entire frontage of the site and that would be required.
Landscaping islands in the parking area would be between four stalls and would include trees, shrubs and
groundcover.
Site design has included the buffering area and the utilization of the existing grades of the site by using
modulation and building height and setbacks. The orientation of the buildings takes in the downtown views. The
commercial building location creates a "gateway effect". The residential building includes vertical and horizontal
modulation with further division of decks and overhangs, changes of materials and color and stepping of the roof
line. The commercial building design includes structural features that create a smaller scale and the facades are
modulated in this building with changes of materials and colors. The east side of the building steps down to
follow the grades that helps further modulate the building. Various materials have been proposed to create a
pleasant frontage. The project does comply with the PUD building standards.
Katherine Laird, 1201 Third Avenue Ste., 1680, Seattle 98101 stated that the applicant would support the
modifications listed in Table A and asked that those be approved. They believe that the walking trail is adequate
to satisfy the entire footage required. The staff report states that there is no lighting plan, there is lighting shown
on the site plan (Ex. 5) there is a legend that shows where lighting would be place. They will provide a more
detailed lighting plan that would show the throw of the light and the candles of the light. There are also two
different height pole lights for the parking lot that have been proposed as part of the site plan.
The site really only works from a circulation perspective if that center crossing is in place. This is a difficult site
due to its triangular shape with a State highway on one side, another main arterial on another side and a residential
neighborhood to the north. It only makes sense to have a fully compatible development of the site, which the city
stressed as being important to them. It would otherwise become a residential island and a commercial island with
difficult access and does not work with the property. Mr. Wagner will give the reasons why the building was
designed with the parking underground and why all of it is not underground. They would ask that the Examiner
approve the parking as it is. The traffic consultant to the project has indicated that the DOT would only allow one
access point off Benson Drive due to the closeness to the State Rt. 515.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 5
Rich Wagrner, Baylis Architects, 10801 Main Street, Bellevue 98004 stated that on the question of the stream
crossing the parking lot on the east side would serve the majority of the offices, if there were to be no auto bridge
and only a pedestrian bridge, that parking lot would also be putting traffic on the residential street, that did not
seem like a wise thing to do. If that area is not developed as a parking lot it has no viable use because of all the
encumbrances that are in that area and the grade. The recognition of the trails being part of the open space can be
made to work. The grade change from Benson Road (SR 515) to the first level which is three floors below the
main level, the grade change is 16-feet, therefore making more underground parking would be very difficult..
They are trying to hit a market rate housing, most of which is all surface parking and in this neighborhood the
development patterns have been all surface parking. The hope is to address partially that 50% of the parking
would be underneath. On the recycling center, enforcement on these has created some problems within the city,
revisiting recycling center codes would be appropriate. The deck size can be accommodated.
Norm Schick, 16625 106`h Ave SE, Renton 98056 stated that he had several question regarding this project. He is
concerned about the increased number of vehicles that would be along 1060'. The speed limit is not posted on that
street and would like to see speed bumps to slow traffic. The water along 106'h now runs toward the project. It
ns in a ditch to a culvert to 172nd
ru, water floods the street during the heavy winter rains. There are many elderly
people living on 106'h they walk a lot and don't hear as well as they should. There is a school near the site and the
parking lot to the south being used for illegal activities and then throwing the residue from that into the school
ground. The school bus runs along 172nd Street which is a substandard street, paving is very thin and would break
up very easy with increased traffic. The west side of the project has become a dumping ground for abandoned
vehicles. With the landscaping along SR515 the roots of the trees could eventually cause the pavement to buckle.
There is a coal mine vent in that area and if it is just filled in, an earthquake could cause the area to settle
considerably. Finally, the property values could be lowered due to this project.
Marilyn Ragle, 16805 106`h Ave SE, Renton 98056 stated that she is concerned about the traffic. She understood
that SE 172°d would be extended to the west to Benson Drive. Her concern is with the increase of traffic would
not only affect 172nd, but also 106'h which would become the quickest and easiest route to take to the new parking
lot of this development. She would also like to see speed bumps on 106'h.
Kayren Kittrick, CED stated that traffic would find where it will go, speed bumps can be installed, the residents
need to request them however, they make it more difficult and the Fire Department does not like them. This is a
new area for the city and it will have to be watched and studied. There will be expansion on 172°d with full
improvements, safety amenities would be put in like sidewalks, all roads will be maintained by the City. All
unposted roads in the City have a speed limit of 25 mph. There are trees that don't eat sidewalks and the City is
using them more often.
Katherine Laird stated that street improvements on 172nd will enhance the pedestrian traffic and improve the road
conditions. There could be a sign at the exit of the garage that could direct people to go right only, no access to
106`h. There is no retail on the ground floor of the apartment which should lower the daytime traffic in that area.
The coal mine vent has been studied by Icicle Creek Engineers, they have recommended a structural plug and is a
condition of approval for this project. This is going to be all apartments, not condominiums.
Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no
further comments from staff. The hearing stopped at 10:52 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 6
1. The applicant, Alex Cugini, C/O Century Pacific, LP, filed a request for a Preliminary Planned Urban
Development (PPUD) to allow the development of a residential building and a commercial building.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation
and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of
Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M).
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located on an almost triangular -shaped parcel delimited by Benson Drive South (SR-
515) on the southwest, Benson Road South on the southeast and SE 172nd Street on the north. Two third -
party properties take up the northeast corner of the triangular block and are developed with a daycare
facility. The subject site is vacant and heavily wooded.
6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as
suitable for the development of commercial corridor uses, but does not mandate such development
without consideration of other policies of the Plan.
7. The subject site is currently zoned CA (Commercial Arterial). It is located in the Urban Design District D
overlay area.
8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5327 enacted in March 2008.
9. The areas north of the subject site are zoned R-8 (Single Family Residential; 8 dwelling units/acre).
Northeast of the site is an R-10 (Residential; 10 dwelling units/acre) zone. An R-14 zone is located east
of the subject site and additional CA zoning is located east and south of the site.
10. The subject site is approximately 164,828 square feet or 3.78 acres. As noted, the parcel is generally
triangular in shape. The parcel has approximately 390 feet of frontage along Benson Road South,
approximately 690 feet of frontage along Benson Drive South and approximately 540 feet of frontage
along 172nd Street.
11. The subject site slopes downward toward a stream that runs generally east to west across the subject site.
High spots are located near the northeast corner of the site and near the triangle's southernmost corner.
12. The stream is a Class 4 stream. The subject site also contains coal mine hazards and steep slopes. The
applicant proposes using buffer averaging to create two usable building footprints. The applicant has two
bridges crossing the creek with one an internal combined vehicular and pedestrian bridge crossing the
creek. Buffer averaging would result in a loss of 6,756 square feet with replacement of 7,014 square feet.
The applicant will be planting enhancement vegetation at a 1:1 ratio for disturbed areas as well as 32,269
square feet of enhanced or invasive plant replacement.
13. The subject site is forested and contains a mix of red alder, big leaf maple, cottonwood and Oregon ash as
well as a mixed understory of shrubs, fir and blackberry. The subject site contains 440 trees of 6-inch or
greater caliper. Forty trees are within the proposed public right-of-way and 94 are located in critical
areas. Staff calculated that there are 306 protected trees of which the applicant proposes retaining 12.
The ERC required protection of potentially 35 trees. The remaining tree and vegetation cover would be
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 7
removed to allow development of the proposed buildings and parking and circulation aisles.
14. The subject site is comprised of two underlying lots. Lot A is .7995 acres and Lot B is 2.9844 acres. The
applicant has a Lot Line Adjustment pending which would create Proposed Lots 1 and 2. Proposed Lot 1
would be approximately 1.98 acres and be located in the north portion of the site. Proposed Lot 2 would
be approximately 1.80 acres of the remaining southern acreage.
15. The applicant proposes developing two buildings on the subject site. A multiple family residential
building, Building A, containing 97 units would be developed on the northeast portion of the site
generally adjacent to Benson Drive and 172nd Street. A mixed use, retail and commercial building,
Building B, containing approximately 26,700 square feet would be located in the southern portion of the
site adjacent to Benson Drive and Benson Road.
16. The multiple family building would be 4-stories over underground parking. The building would contain
107,723 gross square feet. It would be 46 feet tall. The building would contain 59 stalls in the parking
garage and 63 surface stalls located north and east of the building. Staff calculated the density at 50.26
dwelling units per acre after the lot line adjustment is approved. The building's footprint is complex
running east -west, north -south, east -west again and then south to north. This change in facade breaks up
the apparent length and bulk of the building. Coupled with those major breaks in the facade are
modulations in the major facade elements.
17. The retail -commercial building would be 3-stories. It would contain 8,900 square feet of retail space on
the ground level and 17,800 square feet of office space in the upper two stories. There would be 23
structured parking stalls and 36 surface stalls for this building.
18. Both buildings will contain modulation and articulation beyond the standards of code. There will be
horizontal and vertical design changes and decks, overhangs and varied materials and colors used to
camophlage the bulk of both buildings. Canopies will setoff the entrances of the main areas as well as the
individual retail spaces. Features have been designed to create additional shadow lines to also reduce the
apparent bulk and height of the buildings. Staff noted that while the two buildings provide different
functions, they use common materials and linked landscaping and pedestrian elements. Each building is
designed to transition or reflect the adjacent uses - north are residential uses and south are commercial
uses.
19. In addition to the parking specifically allotted to each building there would be 35 surface stalls that could
serve either the residential or commercial uses. Parking will generally be hidden behind the buildings and
not be visible on the arterial streets. The arterial streets provide less than an aesthetic entry for the
buildings and circulation is limited so that the major entrances to the buildings was designed to face the
parking areas although this arrangement was offset by formal entrances with canopies. Retail will face
the street.
20. Access to the site will be provided to the site via six locations. There would be three driveways along
172nd Street with two of those dedicated to the garage. There would be a right-in/right-out driveway
along Benson Drive just south of the creek. There would be two driveways along Benson Road South
with a right-in/right-out driveway located south of the creek and an "enter -only" driveway north of the
creek. Staff noted that the roads in the area can handle the traffic but there will be impacts on the adjacent
residential area. Frontage improvements should facilitate traffic and pedestrians, particularly children
with new sidewalks, curbs and gutters.
21. The landscaping requirements of the CA Zone require 5 percent tree retention. The applicant will attempt
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 8
to protect 35 trees if possible providing a retention rate of approximately 15 percent. In addition, the
applicant will be providing 133 new trees and landscaping around the perimeter of the buildings and the
site. Landscaping will also be provided in the parking areas. Enhanced plantings are proposed along the
north boundary of the subject site to screen the low intensity uses to the north from the apartment
building. The surface parking areas will have a minimum of 15 feet of landscape strips. Staff did
recommend additional landscaping along all of Benson Drive. Staff recommended that the final
landscaping plans show drought -tolerant plants and/or irrigation plans.
22. The applicant proposed a path along the western portion of the creek which would connect to the bridge's
pedestrian path.-SiuGwalks would then provide the rest of the pedestrian circulation. Staff recommended
that the path be continued along the creek to Benson Road as part of the public amenities provided by this
PUD. The applicant had requested a waiver of street improvements along Benson Road (east property
line) to reduce impacts to the creek. Staff noted that the Utility Division believes sufficient area exists for
these improvements and recommended that they be installed to provide a complete pedestrian path. Staff
recommended that pedestrian paths within parking areas be separately delineated.
23. The open space for each unit appears sufficient except for some corner units and the two ground floor
units. Staff has recommended that the decks be enlarged to code dimensions for all units and that the
ground floor units similarly comply with the deck dimension requirements. The applicant has not
provided sufficient common open space. The applicant proposed approximately 2,464 square feet
whereas 4,850 square feet is required. Staff recommended that the project provide the required opened
space.
24. Stormwater will be captured, retained and then released to its natural outlet, the stream, and pre -
development rates will be maintained.
25. Sewer and water will be provided by the Soo Creek District.
26. The applicant has asked that phasing for the project be considered. The applicant has suggested that the
multiple family building would be Phase I and Phase H would entail the commercial building but has
asked that the reverse be considered, too. Staff has noted that the stream mitigation, bridge and pedestrian
amenities on the bridge and along the creek be part of Phase I no matter which element is developed
initially as they are a large part of the public benefit in adopting this PUD.
27. A PUD may not authorize uses inconsistent with those permitted by the underlying zoning but does
permit a modification of standards in some cases. Staff has provided a table showing the requested
modifications from standard requirements. That table is reproduced here:
T.. L.1.. A
REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS FROM RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE (RMC)
RMC # Re uired er RMC Re uested Modi mcation
RMC 4-2-12OA: Required Location for Parking for residential units shall be To provide 59 parking spaces
Parking enclosed within the same building as the within the residential building
unit it serves. in a underground/ground floor
parking garage and 63 surface
parking spaces for the multi.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 9
RMC 4-2-080: Conditions Associated
Note 18.
Stand alone residential and
With Zoning Use Tables
a. General Requirements: Subject to the
ground floor residential to be
density limits of the development
permitted.
standards for this zone and only permitted
within a structure containing commercial
uses on the ground floor. Commercial
space must be reserved on the ground
floor at a minimum of thirty feet (30') in
depth along any street frontage.
Residential uses shall not be located on
the ground floor, except for a residential
entry feature linking the residential
portion of the development to the street.
RMC 4-4-080F.8.c.iii: Maximum
Compact parking spaces shall not account
All other uses — not to exceed
Number of Compact Spaces Outside of
for more than:
34 percent.
the UC-N1 and UC-N2 Zones
i All other uses — not to exceed thirty
percent 30% .
RMC 4-4-090D.1: Refuse and
Minimum Size: A minimum of one and
403.00 square feet
Recyclables Multi -family Developments
one-half (1-1/2) square feet per dwelling
Minimum Size Requirements
unit in multi -family residences shall be
provided for recyclables deposit areas,
except where the development is
participating in a City -sponsored program
in which individual recycling bins are
used for curbside collection. A minimum
of three (3) square feet per dwelling unit
shall be provided for refuse deposit areas.
A total minimum area of eighty (80)
square feet shall be provided for refuse
and recyclables deposit areas.
Comment. For this development, the
minimum size required would be 436.50
s uare eet.
RMC 4-4-130D.2 Restrictions for
Unless exempted by critical areas, RMC
The allowance of 36 trees to be
Critical Areas — General
4-3-05005 or Shoreline Master Program
removed and associated land
Regulations, RMC 4-3-090, no tree
clearing in a Class 4 stream and
removal, or land clearing, or ground cover
stream buffer critical area for
management is permitted:
the construction of vehicular
a. On portions of property with protected
transportation stream crossings
critical habitats, per RMC 4-3-050K;
as permitted by RMC 4-3-
050L.8.a subject to mitigation
per RMC 4-3-OSOL;
streams and lakes, p
identified within the SEPA
Shorelines of the State, per RMC 4-3-090,
Environmental Review.
Renton Shoreline Master Program
Regulations; and wetlands, per RMC 4-3-
050M; and their associated buffers;
Design District `D' Requested Modifications
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 10
RMC 4-3-100E.2.a.ii
The front entry of a building shall not be
Front entry of buildings would
oriented to a drive aisle, but instead a
be permitted to front parking
public or private street or landscaped
areas.
pedestrian -only court -yard
RMC 4-3-100E.3.a.i
A primary entrance of each building shall
A primary entrance of each
be located on the facade facing a street,
building shall be located in a
shall be prominent, visible from the street,
visual prominent location,
connected by a walkway to the public
connected to the street by
sidewalk, and include human -scale
sidewalks to the public
elements.
sidewalk, and include human -
scale elements.
RMC 4-3-100E.5.a.iii
In addition to standard enclosure
In addition to standard
requirements, garbage, recycling
enclosure requirements,
collection, and utility areas shall be
garbage, recycling collection,
enclosed on all sides, including the roof
and utility areas shall be
and screened around their perimeter by a
enclosed on all sides, and
wall or fence and have self -closing doors
screened around their perimeter
by a wall or fence and have
self -closing doors
RMC 4-3-100G.3.b.i
Provide pedestrian overhead weather
Provide pedestrian overhead
protection in the form of awnings,
weather protection on
marquees, canopies, or building
commercial buildings in the
overhangs. These elements shall be a
form of awnings, marquees,
minimum of four and one-half feet (4-1/2')
canopies, or building
wide along at least seventy five percent
overhangs. These elements shall
(75%) of the length of the building facade,
be a minimum of four and one -
a maximum height of fifteen feet (15')
half feet (4-1/2') wide along at
above the ground elevation, and no lower
least seventy five percent (75%)
than eight feet (8') above ground level.
of the length of the building
facade, a maximum height of
fifteen feet (15') above the
ground elevation, and no lower
than eight feet (8') above
ground level.
RMC 4-3-100H.2.d
1,000 square foot Public Plaza at the
590 square foot Public Plaza at
intersection of Benson Drive South and
the intersection of Benson
108'h Avenue SE, with a minimum
Drive South and 108t" Avenue
dimension of 20-feet on one side abutting
SE, with a minimum dimension
the sidewalk.
of 20-feet on one side abutting
the sidewalk. That may be
located just north of the
intersection to accommodate for
existing topographical contrast
at the sub_i ect intersection.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 11
CONCLUSIONS:
Planned Urban Development (PUD)
The PUD Ordinance contains a long and complex series of criteria that are reviewed. They are included in Section 4-9-150-D:
D DECISION CRITERIA:
The City may approve a planned urban development only if it finds that the following requirements are met.
1. Demonstration of Compliance and Superiority Required: Applicants must demonstrate that a
proposed development is in compliance with the purposes of this Section and with the Comprehensive
Plan, that the proposed development will be superior to that which would result without a planned urban
development, and that the development will not be unduly detrimental to surrounding properties.
2. Public Benefit Required: In addition, applicants shall demonstrate that a proposed development
will provide specifically identified benefits that clearly outweigh any adverse impacts or undesirable
effects of the proposed planned urban development, particularly those adverse and undesirable impacts to
surrounding properties, and that the proposed development will provide one or more of the following
benefits than would result from the development of the subject site without the proposed planned urban
development:
a. Critical Areas: Protects critical areas that would not be protected otherwise to the same degree
as without a planned urban development; or
b. Natural Features: Preserves, enhances, or rehabilitates natural features of the subject property,
such as significant woodlands, native vegetation, topography, or noncritical area wildlife
habitats, not otherwise required by other City regulations; or
c. Public Facilities: Provides public facilities that could not be required by the City for
development of the subject property without a planned urban development; or
d. Overall Design: Provides a planned urban development design that is superior in one or more of
the following ways to the design that would result from development of the subject property
without a planned urban development:
i. Open Space/Recreation:
(a) Provides increased open space or recreational facilities beyond standard code
requirements and considered equivalent to features that would offset park mitigation
fees in Resolution 3082; and
(b) Provides a quality environment through either passive or active recreation
facilities and attractive common areas, including accessibility to buildings from
parking areas and public walkways; or
ii. Circulation/Screening: Provides superior circulation patterns or location or screening
of parking facilities; or
iii. Landscaping/Screening: Provides superior landscaping, buffering, or screening in or
around the proposed planned urban development; or
iv. Site and Building Design: Provides superior architectural design, placement,
relationship or orientation of structures, or use of solar energy; or
V. Alleys: Provides alleys to at least fifty percent (50%) of any proposed single family
detached, semi -attached, or townhouse units.
3. Additional Review Criteria: A proposed planned urban development shall also be reviewed for
consistency with all of the following criteria:
a. Building and Site Design:
i. Perimeter. Size, scale, mass, character and architectural design along the planned
urban development perimeter provide a suitable transition to adjacent or abutting
lower density/intensity zones. Materials shall reduce the potential for light and glare.
ii. Interior Design: Promotes a coordinated site and building design. Buildings in groups
should be related by coordinated materials and roof styles, but contrast should be
provided throughout a site by the use of varied materials, architectural detailing,
building orientation or housing type; e.g., single family, detached, attached,
townhouses, etc.
b. Circulation:
i. Provides sufficient streets and pedestrian facilities. The planned urban development
shall have sufficient pedestrian and vehicle access commensurate with the location,
size and density of the proposed development. All public and private streets shall
accommodate emergency vehicle access and the traffic demand created by the
development as documented in a traffic and circulation report approved by the City.
Vehicle access shall not be unduly detrimental to adjacent areas.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 12
ii. Promotes safety through sufficient sight distance, separation of vehicles from
pedestrians, limited driveways on busy streets, avoidance of difficult turning patterns,
and minimization of steep gradients.
Provision of a system of walkways that tie residential areas to recreational areas,
transit, public walkways, schools, and commercial activities.
iv. Provides safe, efficient access for emergency vehicles.
c. Infrastructure and Services: Provides utility services, emergency services, and other
improvements, existing and proposed, which are sufficient to serve the development.
d. Clusters or Building Groups and Open Space: An appearance of openness created by clustering,
separation of building groups, and through the use of well -designed open space and
landscaping, or a reduction in amount of impervious surfaces not otherwise required.
e. Privacy and Building Separation: Provides internal privacy between dwelling units, and
external privacy for adjacent dwelling units. Each residential or mixed -use development shall
provide visual and acoustical privacy for dwelling units and surrounding properties. Fences,
insulation, walks, barriers, and landscaping are used, as appropriate, for the protection and
aesthetic enhancement of the property, the privacy of site occupants and surrounding properties,
and for screening of storage, mechanical or other appropriate areas, and for the reduction of
noise. Windows are placed at such a height or location or screened to provide sufficient
privacy. Sufficient light and air are provided to each dwelling unit.
f. Building Orientation: Provides buildings oriented to enhance views from within the site by
taking advantage of topography, building location and style.
g. Parking Area Design:
i. Design: Provides parking areas that are complemented by landscaping and not
designed in long rows. The size of parking areas is minimized in comparison to
typical designs, and each area related to the group of buildings served. The design
provides for efficient use of parking, and shared parking facilities where appropriate.
ii. Adequacy: Provides sufficient on -site vehicular parking areas consistent with the
parking demand created by the development as documented in a parking analysis
approved by the City. Parking management plans shall ensure sufficient resident,
employee, or visitor parking standards, and there shall be no reliance on adjacent or
abutting properties unless a shared parking arrangement consistent with RMC 4-4-
080 is approved.
h. Phasing: Each phase of the proposed development contains the required parking spaces, open
space, recreation spaces, landscaping and utilities necessary for creating and sustaining a
desirable and stable environment, so that each phase, together with previous phases, can stand
alone.
Compliance with Development Standards: Each planned urban development shall demonstrate
compliance with the development standards contained in subsection E of this Section. (Ord. 5153, 9-
26-2005)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
1. Common Open Space Standard: Open space shall be concentrated in large usable areas and may be
designed to provide either active or passive recreation. Requirements for residential, mixed -use,
commercial, and industrial developments are described below.
a. Residential: For residential developments, open space must be equal to or greater in size than
the total square footage of the lot area reductions requested by the planned urban development,
as illustrated in Figure 1. The open space shall not include a critical area and shall be
concentrated in large usable areas. Stormwater facilities may be incorporated with the open
space on a case -by -case basis if the Reviewing Official finds:
i. The stormwater facility utilizes the techniques and landscape requirements set forth in
The Integrated Pond, King County Water and Land Resources Division, or an
equivalent manual, or
ii. The surface water feature serves areas outside of the planned urban development and
is appropriate in size and creates a benefit.
Site Area: 1.5 acres
Typical Lot Size: 4,500 sq. ft.
Total Number of Lots: 12 Site Area: 1.5 acres
Typical Lot Size: 3,500 sq. ft.
Total Number of Lots: 12
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 13
Open Space: 4,500 s.f. minus 3,500 s.f. = 1,000 s.f. x 12 lots = 12,000 sq. ft.
Standard Subdivision Example Planned Urban Development Approach
Figure 1. Common Open Space Example
b. Mixed Use — Residential Portions: Subsections Elbi to v of this Section specify common open
space standards for the residential portions of mixed -use developments.
i. Mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more
dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area
equal to fifty (50) square feet per unit. The common space area shall be aggregated to
provide usable area(s) for residents. The location, layout, and proposed type of
common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Reviewing
Official. The required common open space shall be satisfied with one or more of the
elements listed below. The Reviewing Official may require more than one of the
following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units.
(a) Courtyards, plazas, or multipurpose open spaces;
(b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens. Such spaces above
the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and
provided as an asset to the development;
(c) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public
street system;
(d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to: tennis/sports courts, swimming
pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or
(e) Children's play spaces. .
ii. Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas shall not be
counted toward the common space requirement or be located in dedicated outdoor
recreation or common use areas.
iii. Required yard setback areas shall not count toward outdoor recreation and common
space unless such areas are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or
adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping
and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the
development.
iv. Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space shall not count toward
the common space/recreation area requirement.
Figure 2. A visible and accessible residential common area containing landscaping and other amenities.
V. Other required landscaping, and sensitive area buffers without common access links,
such as pedestrian trails, shall not be included toward the required recreation and
common space requirement.
c. Mixed Use Nonresidential Portions, or Commercial, or Industrial Uses: The following
subsections specify common open space requirements applicable to nonresidential portions of
mixed use developments or to single use commercial or industrial developments:
i. All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of
nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide
pedestrian -oriented space according to the following formula:
1 % of the lot area + 1 % of the building area = Minimum amount of pedestrian -
oriented space
Figure 3. Examples of pedestrian -oriented space associated with a large-scale retail building.
ii. To qualify as pedestrian -oriented space, the following must be included:
(a) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier -free access) to the abutting
structures from the public right-of-way or a courtyard not subject to vehicular traffic,
(b) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving,
(c) On -site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles
(average) on the ground, and
(d) At least three (3) feet of searing area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per
sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space.
iii. The following features are encouraged in pedestrian -oriented space and may be
required by the Reviewing Official.
(a) Pedestrian -oriented uses at the building facade facing the pedestrian -oriented
space.
(b) Spaces should be positioned in areas with significant pedestrian traffic to provide
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 14
interest and security — such as adjacent to a building entry.
(c) Pedestrian -oriented facades on some or all buildings facing the space consistent
with Figure 4.
(d) Public seating that is durable or easily replaceable, maintainable, and accessible.
Figure 4. Pedestrian -oriented spaces, visible from the street, including ample seating areas, movable furniture,
special paving, landscaping components, and -adjacent pedestrian -oriented uses.
iv. The following are prohibited within pedestrian -oriented space:
(a) Adjacent unscreened parking lots,
(b) Adjacent chain link fences,
(c) Adjacent blank walls,
(d) Adjacent dumpsters or service areas, and
(e) Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) that do not
contribute to the pedestrian environment.
d. Open Space Orientation: The location of public open space shall be considered in relation to
building orientation, sun and light exposure, and local micro -climatic conditions.
e. Common Open Space Guidelines: Common space areas in mixed use residential and attached
residential projects should be centrally located so they are near a majority of dwelling units,
accessible and usable to residents, and visible from surrounding units.
i. Common space areas should be located to take advantage of surrounding features
such as building entrances, significant landscaping, unique topography or
architecture, and solar exposure.
ii. In mixed use residential and attached residential projects children's play space should
be centrally located, visible from the dwellings, and away from hazardous areas like
garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, streets, and parking areas.
2. Private Open Space: Each residential unit in a planned urban development shall have usable
private open space (in addition to parking, storage space, lobbies, and corridors) for the
exclusive use of the occupants of that unit. Each ground floor unit, whether attached or
detached, shall have private open space, which is contiguous to the unit and shall be an area of
at least twenty percent (20%) of the gross square footage of the dwelling units. The private
open space shall be well demarcated and at least ten feet (10') in every dimension. Decks on
upper floors can substitute for some of the required private open space for upper floor units. For
dwelling units which are exclusively upper story units, there shall be deck areas totaling at least
sixty (60) square feet in size with no dimension less than five feet (5').
3. Installation and Maintenance of Common Open Space:
a. Installation: All common area and open space shall be landscaped in accordance with the
landscaping plan submitted by the applicant and approved by the City; provided, that common
open space containing natural features worthy of preservation may be left unimproved. Prior to
the issuance of any occupancy permit, the developer shall furnish a security device to the City
in an amount equal to the provisions of RMC 4-9-060. Landscaping shall be planted within one
year of the date of final approval of the planned urban development, and maintained for a
period of two (2) years thereafter prior to the release of the security device. A security device
for providing maintenance of landscaping may be waived if a landscaping maintenance contract
with a reputable landscaping firm licensed to do business in the City of Renton is executed and
kept active for a two (2) year period. A copy of such contract shall be kept on file with the
Development Services Division.
b. Maintenance: Landscaping shall be maintained pursuant to requirements of RMC 4-4-070.
4. Installation and Maintenance of Common Facilities:
a. Installation: Prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits, all common facilities, including but
not limited to utilities, storm drainage, streets, recreation facilities, etc., shall be completed by
the developer or, if deferred by the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator or his/her
designee, assured through a security device to the City equal to the provisions of RMC 4-9-060,
except for such common facilities that are intended to serve only future phases of a planned
urban development. Any common facilities that are intended to serve both the present and
future phases of a planned urban development shall be installed or secured with a security
instrument as specified above before occupancy of the earliest phase that will be served. At the
time of such security and deferral, the City shall determine what portion of the costs of
improvements is attributable to each phase of a planned urban development.
b. Maintenance: All common facilities not dedicated to the City shallbe permanently maintained
by the planned urban development owner, if there is only one owner, or by the property owners'
association, or the agent(s) thereof. In the event that such facilities are not maintained in a
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 15
responsible manner, as determined by the City, the City shall have the right to provide for the
maintenance thereof and bill the owner or property owners' association accordingly. Such bill,
if unpaid, shall become a lien against each individual property. (Ord. 5153, 9-26-2005)
2. It appears that some background on a PUD (Planned Urban Development) is necessary. The fact is that a
PUD is kind of a compact or contract between the property's owner or developer and the City. The City
modifies or relaxes its normal standards such as lot size or setbacks or street dimensions and the
developer agrees to provide enhanced development and, it must be emphasized "AND" public benefit.
The City's Critical Areas ordinances and complementary regulations already protect the natural features
on this site. So the question is whether the proposed development, two separate buildings with substantial
and interesting design features as well as the proposed trail, provide sufficient public benefit.
The buildings are well -designed and provide more than the required modulating elements. There will be
an interplay of vertical and horizontal elements as well as the use of a variety of materials and colors. All
of these combined architectural elements will soften the appearance of the building and provide the
viewer with buildings with less apparent bulk as well as visual interest. There will be decks on the
residential building and overhangs and canopies on both buildings. The rooflines will modulate and the
facades step inward or change direction. Landscaping all around the project area and in the interior will
provide visual relief. The one intrusive element is the applicant's proposed bridge over the creek in the
interior of the site. While the applicant and staff suggested this enhances the project, clearly, it creates
tradeoffs including the additional intrusion into the creek and its buffer area. It clearly enhances internal
circulation on the site but is it necessary for the two buildings to be tied together by a vehicular crossing
of a creek? The two buildings serve two completely different functions, one residential and the other
retail and office. While the retail offerings might appeal to the residents of the complex, a pedestrian
bridge, a much smaller, less intrusive crossing, could tie those functions together. It appears that the main
selling point of this vehicular bridge is to serve automotive interests and allow parkers to park either north
or south of the creek for access to the office building. It appears staff believes this is an appropriate. And
it might be given the nature of surrounding roads and the limited right-in/right-out limitations on the
driveways serving this site. At the same time, limitations exist for most uses along Benson since free left
turn movements are restricted as they are in other areas of the City such as Rainier. For this tradeoff the
applicant definitely needs to create and welcome the public on trails along the creek throughout the site.
The pedestrian connections, delineations and trail extensions recommended by staff are necessary for this
PUD to provide the necessary public benefit.
4. In most other particulars, as noted, the proposal is well -designed. It takes full advantage of the site's
location and topography to provide an enhanced layout for the two buildings. They are well -separated
providing light and air to both buildings. Views from the site will be enhanced although with the sacrifice
of the dense woods now on the site. The site is zoned for commercial uses but confining the commercial
uses to the southern half of the site reduces impacts on the single family homes north of the site.
Commercial uses could generate a different level of traffic in the evening than residential uses in Building
A which will face those single family uses. The dedication of Building A to residential uses makes sense
to provide a transition to the more intense uses along Benson Drive. At the same time, the new driveways
along 172nd will clearly create new impacts that the current, forested site does not create. Besides traffic,
the new population will increase the general hubbub. These impacts were envisioned when the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning were established for this site and area. The new sidewalks and walking
trails will also provide neighbors with safer walking opportunities.
5. The proposed modifications requested for this PUD as denoted by Table A seem appropriate given the
constraints of the subject site. While it appears that the applicant could probably have achieved many of
its objectives and still met code requirements, the site does contain a creek and heavily trafficked
roadways on two sides of this triangular site. The creek, while not of the highest caliber, does cut across
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 16
the site making for challenging development limitations but also an amenity when fully respected. The
buffer averaging and bridge incursion is being offset with appropriate additions to the creek buffer and
vegetation enhancements. Landscaping will be generously provided along the perimeter of the site and in
the interior. Parking areas will be screened. The buildings contain more than ample architectural
detailing.
The applicant has requested that the project be permitted to be phased. While the applicant suggests that
the residential component would probably be Phase I, the applicant desires to maintain flexibility. In any
event, phasing is appropriate as long as the creek enhancements, internal bridge, trail, landscaping
elements and all frontage improvements are completed with whichever component is Phase I. Frontage
improvements along all roads is an important element whether the residential or commercial component
becomes Phase I so that neighboring residents can walk to the commercial aspect of this proposal or
residents of this complex can circulate to the greater Benson neighborhood and as part of the overall
public benefit of developing this property as a PUD as opposed to just meeting CA standards..
7. In summary, the proposed project appears reasonably well -designed and provides adequate public benefit
RECOMMENDATION:
The Springbrook Preliminary Planned Urban Development should be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Lot Line Adjustment shall be completed and recorded with King County prior to residential
building permit approval.
2. The applicant shall extend the proposed soft surface pedestrian path from the vehicular crossing
in the center of the site to run along the south side of the stream and connect to Benson Road
South, an updated site plan shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager for review
and approval prior to Final PUD approval.
3. All pedestrian pathways within parking lots or parking modules shall be differentiated by material
or texture from adjacent paving materials. An updated site plan depicting proposed materials or
texture for pedestrian pathways through parking areas shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to Final PUD approval
4. A detailed final landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to building permit approval that indicates landscaping enhancement along the
entire frontage of Benson Drive South, with the exception of the portion within the stream buffer
area associated with the Class 4 stream on the subject site.
5. The applicant shall submit a detailed final landscape plan for review and approval by the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval, that indicates either 100 percent
drought tolerant plantings or provide a final irrigation plan with the final detailed landscape plan.
6. The applicant shall submit a lighting plan for review and approval by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to construction permit approval. The lighting plan shall contain pedestrian lighting
in addition to building and landscaping lighting if proposed.
7. Prior to building permit approval, for the commercial structure, the applicant shall provide a
refuse and recycling screening detail to the Current Planning Project Manager for review and
approval.
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 17
8. The applicant shall provide to the Current Planning Project Manager a revised parking plan that
indicates 4 ADA parking spaces for the commercial development prior to Final PUD approval.
9. When the first phase of Springbrook Ridge PUD is to be constructed (either the residential or
commercial building), the final approved stream buffer mitigation plan shall be implemented and
completed, including but not limited to the addition of the soft surface pedestrian trial, two
benches, monument sign, and center site vehicular crossing. The applicant shall complete all
frontage improvements along adjoining roadways as part of Phase I development.
10. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan and/or multi -family building plans to the Current
Planning Project Manager that shows compliance with the 4,850 square feet of common open
space required for the PUD development, prior to Final PUD approval.
11. The decks proposed on the multi -family building, that do not comply with the 5-foot minimum
dimension, shall be redesigned to provide no dimension less then 5-feet. The applicant shall
submit new floor plans for the multi -family building showing compliance with the 5-foot
minimum dimension for private open space to the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
Final PUD approval.
12. The applicant shall be required to establish a joint property owners' association for the
development, which would be responsible for any common improvements, including but not
limited to the soft surface trail within the stream buffer and the shared parking lot, within the
PUD prior to Final PUD approval.
13. The applicant shall complete all frontage improvements along adjoining roadways as part of
Phase I development.
ORDERED THIS 24r' day of September 2009.
FRED J., KA i
HEARING EXAMINER
TRANSMITTED THIS24th day of September 2009 to the parties of record:
Vanessa Dolbee Kayren Kittrick Jerry Miller
Development Services Development Services PO Box 686
Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057
Jerry Miller
P.O. Box 686
Renton, WA 98057
Jerry & Ana Miller
10622 SE 172nd St.
Renton, WA 98055
Norman Schick
16625 106' Ave. SE
Renton, WA 98055
Katherine Laird John Murphy Marilyn Ragle
Century Pacific, LP 4314 148t" St. 16805 — 106t" Ave. SE
1201 Third Ave., Ste. 1680 Bothell, WA 98012 Renton, WA 98055
Seattle, WA 98101
Springbrook Ridge PUD
File No.: LUA 09-024, PPUD, ECF, LLA
September 24, 2009
Page 18
George & Frances Subic
P.O. Box 89
Renton, WA 98057-0089
Crissa Cugini
P.O. Box 359
Renton, WA 98057
Alex & Norma Cugini
P.O. Box 359
Renton, WA 98057
Cathy Cugini
P.O. Box 359
Renton, WA 98057
TRANSMITTED THIS 20 day of September 2009 to the following:
Mayor Denis Law
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison
Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator
Alex Pietsch, Economic Development
Jennifer Henning, Development Services
Stacy Tucker, Development Services
Marty Wine, Assistant CAO
Robert Cugini
P.O. Box 359
Renton, WA 98057
Dave Pargas, Fire
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Planning Commission
Transportation Division
Utilities Division
Neil Watts, Development Services
Janet Conklin, Development Services
Renton Reporter
Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in
writinz on or before 5:00 p.m. October 8, 2009. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery
of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a
review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set
forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be
filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies
of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, fast floor of City Hall. An
appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5.00 p.m. October 8, 2009.
If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the
executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You
may contact this office for information on formatting covenants.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur
concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in
private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both
the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence.
Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as
Appeals to the City Council.
O
n
\ƒ
%
m
7
\/}
CD-0
o
\
CID
§
§
{\
Co
&`\
§
\
S .
0 0
E o
-0 »
( y`'
F 2
k
77
%
>
CD0�
\? 2d
7
(/ +�
T
/ CD, .
\ � `
CD'
0
�
k
- -
a
�
-e
Z)
�
�
�
�
0
=T
3
CD
�
�
�
Attachment C
"ED, ,5
S�
d _ n ,
RNI
LID 10 DU/AC r„E ox wIN
O s
- - N i S �$ g s g�,Fef
d
SE �12r J n St
'g, 02,4, PUD
z�
M>s
w SE 173rd St
-a O
�ti
CD
00
gx eat a �r
m;7
"v
{
Zy
ay�fi�'h�t O o m2a�,`��>Fa ��� "� t. �att�si>t
a
�x
I�
Ik
Zoning Map Changes
October 15, 2009 PUD Boundary Residential - 10 DU/AC
0 160 320 0 Parcels WAI Residential - 14 DU/AC
Feet
Zoning WON Residential - 4 DU/AC
1:3,200
N.:10EDtF'ianningiGlSl N :`' Commercial Arterial Residential - 8 DU/AC
GiS projectstviciriry_mapsimxdsi Residential - 1 DU/AC t Residential Multi -Family
tua09 024 zoning map oct09,mxd
City of Y
Map produced by City of Renton fc?, the City of Renton all rights 0Il1TliUllltjr &" COn0iT11C DeVelOpinelit'
reserved. No -reties of any sort, including but not iimited Alex Pietsch, AdullIllstmtor
to accuracy, fitness or merchantability. accompany this product DatafGIS Analysis Services, Adriana A. Johnson, Patrick Roduin
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF - RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A
PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT (LUA09-024, ECF, PPUD, LLA
SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PUD).
WHEREAS, a land use application for approval of a Preliminary Planned Urban
Development (PPUD) for two (2) tracts of land as hereinafter more particularly described,
located in the City of Renton, has been filed with the Department of Community and Economic
Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the recommendation for approval of the PPUD
from the Hearing Examiner after public hearing thereon as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for this PPUD agrees to the time limits for submittal of the final
plan for the Planned Urban Development pursuant to RMC 4-9-150G.1;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The PPUD pertaining to the described property in Attachment A, attached
hereto and made a part thereof as if fully set forth herein, is approved. This property includes
two separate tracts of land, located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of the intersection of
Benson Drive South (otherwise known as Washington State Route 515) and Benson Road South,
also located south of Southeast 172"d Street.
SECTION I1. The land uses of the PPUD are multi -family residential, retail, and general
office. The multi -family land use is located on the northern tract of land, which will result in a
maximum of ninety-seven (97) residential units within this Planned Urban Development. The
1
ORDINANCE NO.
retail and general office uses will be located on the southern tract of land, and will result in
eight thousand nine hundred (8,900) square feet of retail space and seventeen thousand eight
hundred (17,800) square feet of general office space.
SECTION III. The requested modifications to Renton Municipal Code, as identified in
Attachment B, attached hereto and made a part thereof as if fully set forth herein, are
approved.
SECTION IV. Development of the PPUD is approved in two (2) phases; the residential
phase, to be developed on the northern tract and the retail/office phase to be developed on
the southern tract. Each phase can be developed independent of each other or concurrently,
with no restriction of the order in which they are developed. As a part of Phase I (either
residential or retail/office), the final approved stream buffer mitigation plan shall be
implemented and completed, including but not limited to the addition of the soft surface
pedestrian trail, two benches, monument sign, and center site vehicular crossing and all
frontage improvements shall be completed along all street frontages of the development site.
SECTION V. The effective date of the PPUD approval is the effective date of this
Ordinance, being thirty (30) days after publication. The date of expiration of the approval shall
be pursuant to RMC 4-9-150G.1 which will be two (2) years from the date of approval. The
Hearing Examiner may grant one (1) extension of the PPUD approval for a maximum of twelve
(12) months.
SECTION VI. The City's Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change
the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, to reflect the land use application number on the tracts of
2
ORDINANCE NO.
land identified in SECTION I above and as reflected in Attachment C, attached hereto and made
a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1592:10/22/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
3
Attachment A
October 15, 2009 Vicinity M a p
0 150 300 ®Springbrook Ridge PUD Project Location Boundary
Feet
Parcels
1:3,200 N 0
H: ICEDlPianningl GI SIGIS_pr-giectsl
vicinity _mapslmxdsVua09 024 vicinity map oct00.mxd City of -^
Ec on�evelopm
Map prcdu_e0 by City Of Renton (c). tie City of Ranson all ighfs Community & M Dent
ipvrvcd Vn marnMir_s d ary so^f, inrl.�Ynp:uA nn-'rtrL•rcf Alex PSelsah, da miaismioI
iu accuracy, fdness or merG'artailAy. accompny :ai; prutluct D,,i'A CilS AnWysnti S�T%M1t:mL. 1rhrma A Julmwn Nalnck Rod=
ORDINANCE NO.
ATTACHMENT B
REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS FROM RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE (RMC)
(LUA09-024, ECF, PPUD, LLA SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PUD)
RMC #
Required per RMC
Approved Modification
RMC 4-2-12OA: Required Location
Parking for residential units shall be
To provide fifty-nine
for Parking
enclosed within the same building as
(59) parking spaces
the unit it serves.
within the residential
building in an
underground/ground
floor parking garage and
sixty-three (63) surface
parking spaces for the
multi -family building.
RMC 4-2-080A.118.a: Conditions
a. General Requirements: Subject to
Stand alone residential
Associated With Zoning Use Tables
the density limits of the
and ground floor
development standards for this zone
residential to be
and only permitted within a
permitted.
structure containing commercial
uses on the ground floor.
Commercial space must be reserved
on the ground floor at a minimum of
thirty feet (30') in depth along any
street frontage. Residential uses shall
not be located on the ground floor,
except for a residential entry feature
linking the residential portion of the
development to the street.
RMC 4-4-080F.8.c.iii: Maximum
Compact parking spaces shall not
All other uses — not to
Number of Compact Spaces
account for more than:
exceed thirty-four
Outside of the UC-N1 and UC-N2
. All other uses— not to exceed
percent (34%).
Zones
thirty percent (30%).
RMC 4-4-090D.1: Refuse and
Minimum Size: A minimum of one
Four hundred and three
Recyclables Multi -family
and one-half (1-1/2) square feet per
(403.00) square feet
Developments Minimum Size
dwelling unit in multi -family
Requirements
residences shall be provided for
recyclables deposit areas, except
where the development is
participating in a City -sponsored
program in which individual recycling
bins are used for curbside collection.
A minimum of three (3) square feet
ORDINANCE NO.
ATTACHMENT B
per dwelling unit shall be provided
for refuse deposit areas. A total
minimum area of eighty (80) square
feet shall be provided for refuse and
recyclables deposit areas.
RMC 4-4-130D.2: Tree Retention
Unless exempted by critical areas,
The allowance of thirty -
and Land Clearing Regulaitons,
RMC 4-3-05005 or Shoreline Master
six (36) trees to be
Restrictions for Critical Areas —
Program Regulations, RMC 4-3-090,
removed and associated
General
no tree removal, or land clearing, or
land clearing in a Class 4
ground cover management is
stream and stream
permitted:
buffer critical area for
a. On portions of property with
the construction of
protected critical habitats, per RMC
vehicular transportation
4-3-050K; streams and lakes, per
stream crossings as
RMC 4-3-050L; Shorelines of the
permitted by RMC 4-3-
State, per RMC 4-3-090, Renton
050L.8.a, subject to.
Shoreline Master Program
mitigation identified
Regulations; and wetlands, per RMC
within the SEPA
4-3-050M; and their associated
Environmental Review.
buffers;
Attachment C
ISE1
w
Cn
m
C
a).
Res�aa�` 'o
ai 6'
October 15, 2009
0 160 320
Feet
1:3,200 A 1
H.ICEDVPIanninglGISV �V
GIS_pmjectslvicinity_mapsV nxdsl
Itia09 024 zoning map octO9.mxd
Map produced by City of Renton (c), the City of Renton all rights
reserved. No -ties of any sort, Including but not limited
to accuracy, fitness or merchantabiuty, accompany this product
g
c
-10
LU
5
a'��ej>ai o0
0
Zoning Map
Changes
0 PUD Boundary
Residential - 10 DU/AC
Q Parcels
Residential - 14 DU/AC
Zoning
Residential - 4 DU/AC
Commercial Arterial
Residential - 8 DU/AC
Residential - 1 DU/AC
Residential Multi -Family
I City o
ommwuty &Economic Developmen
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
T)ata/CrTS Analysis Senrices, Adriana A. Johnson, Patrick Rodnin
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
1.4
AI #: J.
Submitting Data: Public Works Department
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division
November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager
(extension 7471)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Correspondence..
Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine Purchase
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business....... X
Exhibits:
Study Sessions......
Issue Paper
Information.........
Smart Tote De-icer Photos
Recommended Action:
Approvals:
Refer to the Transportation/Aviation Committee
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept...... X
Fiscal Impact: a25088/422.000000.016.5940.0046.63.0000000
Expenditure Required... $26,280 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $12,892 (a25088 for 2009) Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $26,280 City Share Total Project.. $26,280
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Renton Municipal Airport (Airport) would like to purchase a Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine to
assist in keeping the runway free of accumulated ice.
The cost of the Smart Tote de-icer is $26,280 including tax. The Smart Tote 125 is mountable on either
a truck or trailer, and is designed to efficiently coat runway and taxiway surfaces with the correct
amount of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved de-icing fluid. We want to have the
equipment here and available for use before the end of the calendar year, and preferably by the start of
December. If this year is anything like the last several years, we can expect to be using this equipment
on the runway by the end of the year.
The following reasons are why the Airport should purchase this de-icing unit.
1. Boeing is unable to deliver aircraft if the runway is icy.
2. The city's existing de-icing equipment is insufficient to handle the Airport's needs.
3. The Smart Tote 125 will efficiently spread expensive de-icing fluid.
4. Using de-icer will extend the life of the new runway.
5. The cost of removing ice is significantly increased when outside contractors need to be
hired.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the purchase of the Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine for use at the Renton Municipal Airport.
H:\File Sys\AIR - Airport, Transportation Services Division\03 Projects\01 Tasks\Agenda Bills\Agenda Bill - Smart tote deicer\Ag bill - Deicer.doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D citvof
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 9, 2009
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: �a Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Gregg , ZimmermaL inistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager (extension 7471)
SUBJECT: Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine Purchase
ISSUE:
Should Council approve the purchase of a Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine for use at the
Renton Municipal Airport?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the purchase of the Smart Tote 125 De-icing Machine for use at the Renton Municipal
Airport.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Renton Municipal Airport (Airport) would like to purchase a Smart Tote 125 De-icing
Machine to assist in keeping the runway free of accumulated ice.
The cost of the Smart Tote de-icer is $26,280 including tax. The Smart Tote 125 is mountable
on either a truck or trailer, and is designed to efficiently coat runway and taxiway surfaces with
the correct amount of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved de-icing fluid. We want
to have the equipment here and available for use before the end of the calendar year, and
preferably by the start of December. If this year is anything like the last several years, we can
expect to be using this equipment on the runway by the end of the year.
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 3
November 9, 2009
The following reasons are why the Airport should purchase this de-icer unit.
1. Boeing is unable to deliver aircraft if the runway is icy.
2. The city's existing de-icing equipment is insufficient to handle the Airport's needs.
3. The Smart Tote 125 will efficiently spread expensive de-icing fluid.
4. Using de-icer will extend the life of the new runway.
5. The cost of removing ice is significantly increased when outside contractors need to
be hired.
Boeing is unable to deliver aircraft if the runway is icy. The entire runway must be clear of ice
before a production aircraft may be released and delivered to its customer. Even intermittent
or patchy ice poses a serious safety problem for Boeing flights and will cause delays. Unlike in
years past, Boeing is operating on a very tight delivery schedule that has no room for "float."
While closing the runway might have been an option years ago, Boeing now requires the
runway to be open and operational every day of the year to meet the demands of their
customers.
The city's existing de-icing equipment is insufficient to handle the Airport's needs. The city
maintenance shop only has one de-icing truck available for the entire city. Bringing this truck
down to help de-ice the runway is not feasible. The truck would have to be thoroughly cleaned
to prevent cross -contamination between the regular road de-icer and the FAA approved
runway de-icer. Between cleaning the truck and applying the de-icer, the truck would be tied
up for a longer period of time at the Airport, therefore reducing its presence on city roads.
The Smart Tote 125 will efficiently spread expensive de-icing fluid. Runways and taxiways
must be de-iced with an FAA approved liquid de-icer that is different than de-icer used on city
streets. Since FAA approved products are expensive (the last quote provided had liquid de-icer
at $12.12 per gallon), efficiently spreading that product means we will get better asphalt
coverage and better product efficiency.
Using de-icer will extend the life of the new runway. The Airport recently completed repaving
all of Runway 16/34 at a cost of approximately $4 million. During the ice removal operations
last year, the Airport brought in a steel bladed road grader and a jet engine style heater to
assist. While we were able to remove a lot of the ice buildup on the runway, we also scarred
and damaged the surface of the runway and taxiways in the process. Applying the right
product with the right equipment will not only save our pavement's physical integrity, but will
also yield much better results.
The cost of removing ice is significantly increased when outside contractors need to be hired.
While the Airport is currently equipped to handle moderate snow events, we are not prepared
to handle icing situations. The Airport spent approximately $16,000 during the 2008
Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 3 of 3
November 9, 2009
snowstorms, just to bring the runway up to standard for Boeing departures. While the
contractors did help us re -open the runway to Boeing departures that level of spending on ice
removal is unsustainable over the long run.
Payment Schedule
We have asked the manufacturer to come up with a short term, no interest payment plan so we
can spread the cost over two budget years. According to its lease/purchase plan, we would be
making a total of two payments. The equipment would be delivered within 45 days of an
executed agreement and would include all necessary training for Airport staff. The funds to
cover the total purchase price will be allocated from our major maintenance capital account.
Purchase and Sale Agreement
The purchase and sale agreement for purchasing this equipment is attached.
Attachment: Myslik, Inc. Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 22, 2009
cc: [wen Wang, AS Administrator
Peter Hahn, Deputy Public Works Administrator —Transportation
Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager
JoAnn Wykpisz, Principal Financial and Administrative Analyst
Connie Brundage, Transportation Administrative Secretary
Susan Campbell-Hehr/Carolyn Currie, Airport Secretary
H:FileSys/Air-airport, Transportation Services Division/03 Projects/01 Tasks/Agenda bills/Agenda Bill -Smart tote deicer/Issue Paper De-icer-RGC
site
Smart Tote 125 Deicing Machine
e
Y
OCT-23-2009 16:30 FROM:
5419771303 TO:14254307472 P.1
K, INC.
NRISE DRIVE
IN, COLORADO 80465
Ify SNOW, ICE & FOD CO OL PRODUCTS
ase and Sale Agreement
Between MySlik Inc. (lessor/seller) and City of Renton Airport (lessee/purchaser)
October 22, 2009
Item
1. One(]) complete Smart Tote 125 Deicer system sold by Myslik Inc. ("Unit").
2. No deicing tote / fluid.
Terms
1. Myslik Inc agrees to sell the Renton Airport one (1) Smart Tote 125 Deicer for the sum of
$26,280 (Unit cost plus WST of 9.5% is $24,000 + $2,280 = $26,280).
2. Myslik agrees to the following no4nterest payment schedule:
a. At time of Unit delivery, an invoice will be submitted and payment of $3.280 will
be made to Myslik Inc.
6: 13y January 50, 2010 an invoice will be submitted for the remaining balance of
$23,000 and payment will be submitted to MySlik Inc.
3. If City of Renton staff damage the Unit before the Unit has been paid off, then the City of
Renton has the responsibility for repairs. If the product is defective or is missing parts or
becomes inoperable during normal use, during the payment period, then MySlik agrees
to repair or replace the Unit as needed to bring it back to regular working order.
4. The Unit has a one (1) year warranty effective from the date of delivery. The warranty will
coverall parts and labor to fix the Unit.
5. Myslik Inc. agrees to provide all training for staff members of the Renton Airport upon unit
delivery.
By signing below, each party agrees to the terms of this agreement.
MySlik Inc.
City of Renton Airport
OFFICE 303.697.9692 FAX; 303.697.9693 CELL: 303.810.05.21 WWW.MYSLUaNC.COM
OCT-23-2009 16:30 FROM: 5419771303 TO:14254307472 P.2
Bill Hodgson Ryan Zulauf
Western Region Sales City of Renton Airport
Datev23 dG z-.-, Date:
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Public Works
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems/Water Utility
Staff Contact...... Tom Malphrus, x-7313
Subject:
Final Pay Estimate — CAG-07-141 (WTR-27-3214)
Hazen Reservoir
Contractor: T Bailey, Inc.
Exhibits:
Pay Estimate #20 (FINAL)
Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract
Request for Contract Release
Project Description
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Al #:
For Agenda of: November 9, 2009
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....,
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept.....
Other ...............
X
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $2,190 (final pay estimate only) Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $2,500 (final pay estimate only) Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $6,500,000 (2007 - 2009) City Share Total Project.. 100%
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The construction contract was awarded to T Bailey, Inc. on September 24, 2007. Construction
started November 19, 2007 and was completed on October 15, 2009. The original contract
amount was $5,404,265.96 and the final contract amount is $5,471,172.34. The increase of
$75,876.48 (1.4% of the original contract amount) was used for construction change orders to
add a sewer telemetry system to the Hazen reservoir site, install water valves and electrical
conduits not in the original project scope, removal of diseased and dying trees and concrete
rubble discovered at the project site during construction and the addition of a reservoir
foundation drain due to ground water concerns discovered during construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the project, approve the final pay estimate in the amount of $2,190, and release the
retainage bond in the amount of $251,047.98 after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required
authorizations.
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-3214 Hazen 565 Zone Reservoir Construction\Payment\Agenda Bill -Final
Payment.doc\TMtp
State of Washington
Department of Revenue
�� PO Box 47474
REVENUE Olympia WA 98504-7474 Contractor's Registration NO. (UBI No.) 601351925
Date 11 /9/09
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
From:
City of Renton
Attn: Natalie Wissbrod
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
OEM
Assigned To
Date Assigned
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below
Description of Contract
Contract Number
Hazen Reservoir
CAG-07-141
Contractor's Name
Telephone Number
T Bailey Inc.
360-293-0682
Contractor's Address
12441 Bartholomew Rd., Anacortes, WA 98221
Date Work Commenced
Date Work Completed
Date Work Accepted
11/19/07
1 10/15/2009
11/9/09
Surety or Bonding Company
delity and Deposit Company of Maryland
gent's Address
Julie M. Glover, Hub International LLC, 12100 NE 195" St., Ste 200, Bothell, WA
Contract Amount
Additions
Reductions
Sub -Total
Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 0.0 %
(If various rates apply, please send a breakdown)
TOTAL
Comments: Sales Tax Breakdown
8.9% - $210,812.53
9.0% - $226,194.67
9.5%- $13,205.51
Total = $450,212.71
$ 4,962,595.00
$ + 69,474.63
$ — 11,110.00
$ 5,020,959.63
$ 450,212.71
$ 5,471,172.34
Signature
Liquidated Damages $ 0.00
Amount Disbursed
Amount Retained
Type or Print Name Natalie Wissbrod
Phone Number 425.430.6919
TOTAL
$ 5,220,124.36
$ 251,047.98
$ 5,471,172.34
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue,
DO Box 47474, Olympia, WA 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO
YMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in
accordance with said certificate.
To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 753-3217. Teletype
(TTY) users please call (800) 451-7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.gov.
REV 31 0020e (6-27-01)
Department of Labor and Industries Request for Contract Release
Contract Release
PO Box 44274 t
Olympia, WA 98504-4272
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
Do not pay retained funds until you have Department of Labor and Industries approval
Contractor's Tax Registration No. (UBI No.) 6 01 3 51 9 2 5
From:
Date: 11/09/2009
d
aTL1E= c% d Te S Of �P11 IIG aPi1G �x ti a G >� i. ' I)
� e arr menu �e Onl �
City o Renton - Attn: Natalie Wiss rod g - ', r• , � 3
���k
1055 S. Grad Way d z QP
Y Y N
Renton, WA 98057 `gib N Ys
ivonce is nerevy given retative to the completion of contract or project described below
Project Name/Description of Project: Contract Number: CAG-0 7 -141
Hazen Reservoir Contract Amount
$5,020,959.63
Retained Amount$ 2 51, 0.4 7.9 8 by
Contractor's Name: T. Bailey, Inc.
Telephone Number: 3 6 0- 2 9 3- 0 6 8 2
Contractor's Address: 12441 Bartholomew Rd., Anacortes, WA 98221
Date Contract Awarded:
Date Work Commenced:
Date Work Completed:
Date Work Accepted:
O-)f24 200
1 2
Surety or Bonding Company:
Fidelity and Deposit Company. of Maryland
Agent's Address:
Julie M. Glover, Hub Intl.,Bothell.
Please list Subcontractors below: Continue Subcontractors list on other .side_ 98011
Subcontractor's Name
UBI Number:
Castle Walls, LLC
602074096
Maple's Tree Specialist
601092427
J B Asphalt Paving, Inc.
602267852
Finishing Edge Washington, LLC j602677001
iDisliurs,1nOffic�r"'..
a4 x
5
Comments:
r,
r3"s
,... ..,3..... ,,.::,.: ._•..... d�..__ . .,�,°
Contact Name:
Natalie Wissbrod
Phone Number:
4 2 5- 4 3 0- 6 919
Email Address:
nwissbrod@rentonwa.gov
The Disbursing Officer must complete and submit this notice to the Department of Labor and Industries immediately after
acceptance of the work done under this contract. Mail this notice to Department of Labor and Industries, Contract
Release, PO Box 44274, Olympia, WA 98504-4274, or fax to (360) 902-6897 or e-mail to ContractRelease,@lni.wa.aov.
NO PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of the Department's certificate of release,
and then only in accordance with the certificate.
For assistance contact Contract Release at (360) 902-5360.
A
nd
F215-038-000 Request for Contract Release 09-2009
Please list Subcontractors below:
Subcontractor's Name
UBI Number:
Cascade Steel, Inc.
601483253
J B's Landscaping, Inc.
601934846
Olympic Fence Company, Inc.
601376210
Automated Equipment Co.
601111142
Coatings Unlimited Co.
601298793
Paramount Electric Co.
278046641
F215-038-000 Request for Contract Release 09-2009
TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR
CONTRACTOR: T. Bailey Inc.
CONTRACT NO. CAG-07-141 PO# 18/0001519 ESTIMATE NO. 20 (FINAL)
PROJECT: Hazen Reservoir, WTR-27-3214 Closing Date: 10/15/2009
1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $2,000.00
2. SALES TAX @ 9.50% $190.00
3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $2,190.00
4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $5,018,959.63
5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $2,000.00
6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $5,020,959.63
7 SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $450,022.71
8 SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $190.00
9 SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX $450,212.71
GRAND TOTAL: _ $5,471,172.34
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION:
PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 8):
ACCOUNT # 425.018.5950.0034.63/u55515.f010.0000.0000 $2,190.00
$2,190.00
Contractor Posted Retainage Bond #08907924
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland as Surety
therefore the City is not with holding retainage
TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $2,190.06
CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965
CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF
PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE
SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID
OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON, AND THAT I AM
AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM
Signed:6%4j
i►
%/h /0/17 12,cO R
Printed On: 10/16/2009 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1
Printed On: 10/16/2009 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1
'ect: Hazen Reservoir, WTR-27-3214
actor. T. Bailey Inc.
Item Description
No.
Contract Number. CAG-07-141
Pay Estimate 20 (FINAL) Closing Date: 10/15/2009
Unit Est. Unit Previous Previous This
Quantity Price Quantity Amount Quantity
This Total
Total
Amount
001.
Mobilization, Demobilization, Site Preparation & Clean-up
Lump Sum
1
$20.000.00
0.93
$18.600.00
0.07
$1.400.00
1.00
$20,000.00
002.
Site Work
Lump Sum
1
$422.000.00
1.00
$422,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$422,000.00
003.
NE 12th Access Road Improvements
Lump Sum
1
$15,000.00
1.00
$15.000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$15,000.00
004.
Maintenance of NE 12th Access Road
Lump Sum
1
$15,000.00
1.00
$15,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$15,000.00
005.
Landscaping
Lump Sum
1
$10,000.00
1.00
$10,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$10,000.00
006.
Site Utilities
Lump Sum
1
$400,000.00
1.00
$400,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$400,000.00
007.
Storm water Detention Pond Retaining Wall
Lump Sum
1
$100,000.00
1.00
$100,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$100,000.00
008.
Reservoir Earthwork
Lump Sum
1
$275,000.00
1.00
$275,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$275,000.00
009.
Unscheduled Excavation
Cubic Yard
355
$25.00
15.00
$375.00
0.00
$0.00
15.00
$375.00
010.
Backfill
Lump Sum
1
$70,000.00
1.00
$70,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$70,000.00
011.
Unscheduled Backfill
Cubic Yard
160
$30.00
73.00
$2,190.00
0.00
$0.00
73.00
$2,190.00
2.
Dewatering
Lump Sum
1
$5,000.00
1.00
$5,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$5,000.00
013.
Reservoir Foundation
Lump Sum
1
$775,000.00
1.00
$775,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$775,000.00
014.
Reservoir Floor, Shell and Roof
Lump Sum
1
$1,825,000.00
1.00 $1,825,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$1,825,000.00
015.
Reservoir Stairs and Landings
Lump Sum
1
$70,000.00
1.00
$70,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$70,000.00
016.
Finishes
Lump Sum
1
$300,000.00
1.00
$300,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$300,000.00
017.
Environmental Control
Lump Sum
1
$15,000.00
1.00
$15,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$15,000.00
018.
Reservoir Mechanical
Lump Sum
1
$75,000.00
1.00
$75,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$75,000.00
019.
Electrical and Telemetry
Lump Sum
1
$140,000.00
1.00
$140,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$140,000.00
020.
Electrical Building Structure
Lump Sum
1
$90,000.00
1.00
$90,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$90,000.00
021.
Shoring
Lump Sum
1
$5,000.00
1.00
$5,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$5,000.00
022.
12-inch Ductile Iron Pipe
Lineal Foot
916
$120.00
916.00
$109,920.00
0.00
$0.00
916.00
$109,920.00
023.
12-inch Gate/Isolation Valve
Each
4
$2,000.00
4.00
$8,000.00
0.00
$0.00
4.00
$8.000.00
024.
Fire Hydrant Assembly
Each
1
$5,000.00
1.00
$5,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$5,000.00
025.
Connection To Existing Water Main
Each
2
$12,000.00
2.00
$24,000.00
0.00
$0.00
2.00
$24,000.00
Highlands Reservoir
LS
1
$130,000.00
1.00
$130,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$130,000.00
027.
Highlands Electrical and Telemetry
LS
1
$30,000.00
0.98
$29,400.00
0.02
$600.00
1.00
$30,000.00
028.
Hydroseed and Revegetation
LS
1
$5,000.00
1.00
$5,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$5,000.00
Printed On: 10/16/2009 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 2
Project:
Hazen Reservoir, WTR-27-3214
Contract Number.
CAG-07-141
Contractor. T. Bailey Inc.
Pay Estimate
20 (FINAL)
Closing Date:
10/15/2009
Item
Description
Unit
Est.
Unit
Previous
Previous
This
This
Total
Total
No.
Quantity
Price
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
029.
As-builts
LS
1
$10,000.00
1.00
$10,000.00
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$10,000.00
CO #1
LS
1
$6,283.54
1.00
$6.283.54
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$6,283.54
CO#2
Time Extension Only
N/A
1
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
CO#3
LS
1
$33,365.68
1.00
$33,365.68
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$33,365.68
CO#4
LS
1
$18,488.92
1.00
$18,488.92
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$18,488.92
CO#5
LS
1
$11,336.49
0.00
$11,336.49
0.00
$0.00
1.00
$11,336.49
CO#6
No cost Change Order
LS
1
$0.00
1 0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
Subtotal
8.9% Sales Tax
9.0 % Sales Tax beginning 04-01-08
9.5% Sales Tax beginning 04-01-09
TT Total
$5,018,959.63
$210,812.53
$226,194.67
$13,015.51
$5,468,982.34
$2,000.00 $5,020,959.63
$190.00 $450,212.71
$2,190.00 $5,471,172."
HAZEN RESERVOIR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
On October 15, 2009, the Water Utility completed the construction -of the Hazen Reservoir
project. The Hazen Reservoir is a 4.2 million gallon welded steel reservoir, 80-feet in
diameter and approximately 125-feet in height. The Hazen Reservoir serves the Highlands
565 pressure zone, the same pressure zone served by the 750,000 gallon Highlands Elevated
Reservoir. Water use in the 565 pressure zone accounts for 22 percent of the water system
demand in the City's water service area. The Hazen Reservoir provides storage of potable
water for daily use and for emergency use, such as after a large earthquake, and provides
water for fire fighting. The Hazen Reservoir was placed into service in March 2009, and was
instrumental in providing water to fight the Harrington Square Fire of June 30, 2009.
The Hazen Reservoir is named after Hazen High School, a Renton School District high school
which borders it to the south. A large H was painted on the reservoir at the request of the
Hazen High School student body. The H denotes the location of Hazen High School and is a
source of pride for the Hazen High School student body. The cost of painting the H was
donated by Gene Tanaka, owner/president of the general contracting company which built
the Hazen Reservoir.
T Bailey, Inc., of Anacortes, WA, constructed the Hazen Reservoir. The total cost of
construction is $5,471,172.34. The total project cost, including design engineering,
administration, services during construction, inspection and permitting is $6,144,000.00.
Construction of reservoir foundation
T. .
Installing the roof on the reservoir shell
Construction of reservoir shell
The completed reservoir with the Hazen H
H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-3214 Hazen 565 Zone Reservoir
Construction\Payment\HazenCompletionNarrative.doc\TMtp
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 2
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES
ANNEXATION AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT.
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5489, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 18.2 acres, generally located immediately south of Northeast
12th Street, if extended, and immediately west of 148th Avenue SE, known as the Honey Creek
Estates annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant to law,
must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 2
before the qualified electors within the Honey Creek Estates annexation area in the February 9,
2010, ballot.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 2 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
2. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
18.2-acres known as the Honey Creek Estates annexation area and would allow
the area to remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
❑ Yes
❑ No
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 2 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 3
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT..
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5491, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 15.9 acres, generally located immediately north of Southeast
Renton -Issaquah Road and immediately east of Jericho Avenue Northeast, if extended, known
as the Sunset East annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant
to law, must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 3
before the qualified electors within the Sunset East annexation area in the February 9, 2010,
ballot.
SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 3 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
3. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
15.9-acres known as the Sunset East annexation area and would allow the area to
remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
❑ Yes
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 3 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Denis Law, Mayor
2009.
3
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON GRANTING AUTHORITY
FOR AN INTERFUND LOAN TO FUND 422, RENTON GATEWAY CENTER UTILITIES,
FOR 750 WEST PERIMETER ROAD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, RCW 43.09.200 provides that the State Auditor shall formulate, prescribe,
and install a system of accounting and reporting for all local governments; and
WHEREAS, such a system has been created and is known as the Budgeting, Accounting
and Reporting System (BARS); and
WHEREAS, the BARS manual at Part 3, Chapter 4, Section A, provides guidelines for
loans between City funds; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3811 of the City of Renton Washington granted authority for
temporary loans between City funds; and
WHEREAS, Fund 422, Renton Gateway Center Utilities, is in need of a temporary loan of
four hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($475,000) from City Utilities in order to provide
pad -ready improvements for the leased area located at 750 West Perimeter Road (750 site).
The 750 site is the area that was recently leased to the Renton Gateway Center, LLC for the
construction of a hangar building;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO,
SECTION 11. An interfund loan of two hundred forty thousand dollars ($240,000) from
the Water Utility, Fund 405, and an interfund loan of two hundred thirty-five thousand dollars
($235,000) from the Surface Water Utility, Fund 407, for a total loan amount of four hundred
seventy-five thousand dollars ($475,000) are authorized for Fund 422 for utility improvements
to the 750 site. The life of the loan will be five (5) years, and the estimated interest will be fifty-
one thousand dollars ($51,000) over the five (5) year period of the loan. The annual loan
repayments from the Airport will be one hundred five thousand two hundred four dollars
($105,204).
SECTION III. This Resolution shall be effective upon its passage and approval.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1427:10/22/09:scr
2
Denis Law, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A
PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT (LUA09-024, ECF, PPUD, LLA
SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PUD).
WHEREAS, a land use application for approval of a Preliminary Planned Urban
Development (PPUD) for two (2) tracts of land as hereinafter more particularly described,
located in the City of Renton, has been filed with the Department of Community and Economic
Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the recommendation for approval of the PPUD
from the Hearing Examiner after public hearing thereon as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for this PPUD agrees to the time limits for submittal of the final
plan for the Planned Urban Development pursuant to RMC 4-9-150G.1;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The PPUD pertaining to the described property in Attachment A, attached
hereto and made a part thereof as if fully set forth herein, is approved. This property includes
two separate tracts of land, located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of the intersection of
Benson Drive South (otherwise known as Washington State Route 515) and Benson Road South,
also located south of Southeast 172"d Street.
SECTION II. The land uses of the PPUD are multi -family residential, retail, and general
office. The multi -family land use is located on the northern tract of land, which will result in a
maximum of ninety-seven (97) residential units within this Planned Urban Development. The
1
ORDINANCE NO.
retail and general office uses will be located on the southern tract of land, and will result in
eight thousand nine hundred (8,900) square feet of retail space and seventeen thousand eight
hundred (17,800) square feet of general office space.
SECTION III. The requested modifications to Renton Municipal Code, as identified in
Attachment B, attached hereto and made a part thereof as if fully set forth herein, are
approved.
SECTION IV. Development of the PPUD is approved in two (2) phases; the residential
phase, to be developed on the northern tract and the retail/office phase to be developed on
the southern tract. Each phase can be developed independent of each other or concurrently,
with no restriction of the order in which they are developed. As a part of Phase I (either
residential or retail/office), the final approved stream buffer mitigation plan shall be
implemented and completed, including but not limited to the addition of the soft surface
pedestrian trail, two benches, monument sign, and center site vehicular crossing and all
frontage improvements shall be completed along all street frontages of the development site.
SECTION V. The effective date of the PPUD approval is the effective date of this
Ordinance, being thirty (30) days after publication. The date of expiration of the approval shall
be pursuant to RMC 4-9-150G.1 which will be two (2) years from the date of approval. The
Hearing Examiner may grant one (1) extension of the PPUD approval for a maximum of twelve
(12) months.
SECTION VI. The City's Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change
the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, to reflect the land use application number on the tracts of
K
ORDINANCE NO.
land identified in SECTION I above and as reflected in Attachment C, attached hereto and made
a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1592:10/22/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
3
Attachment A
October 15, 2009 Vicinity M a p
0 150 300 ®Springbrook Ridge PUD Project Location Boundary
Feet
1:3,200 A' = Parcels
H'I CEDIPlanningl GI SIGI S_projects'IV
vicinity_mapslmxdsVua09 024 vicinity map oct09.mxd --' City o f ,"�7
Rtap produced by city of Renton (0. tie City of Rennin all ights CarnniUni & Ee:onomic Development
m_ ma d Vn rnranfir_s of ary -t, inrl.iYrtgtwt nit �irrhal �Iex Pletscll, Admin1SU'aloi
to accuracy.fitnessormerctart"MV.accompany 04product UuWGISAnaiysisSmie:-,,4Achiu=A.Julmxm.YabkkRod=
ORDINANCE NO.
ATTACHMENT B
REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS FROM RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE (RMC)
(LUA09-024, ECF, PPUD, LLA SPRINGBROOK RIDGE PUD)
RMC #
Required per RMC
Approved Modification
RMC 4-2-120A: Required Location
Parking for residential units shall be
To provide fifty-nine
for Parking
enclosed within the same building as
(59) parking spaces
the unit it serves.
within the residential
building in an
underground/ground
floor parking garage and
sixty-three (63) surface
parking spaces for the
multi -family building.
RMC 4-2-080A.118.a: Conditions
a. General Requirements: Subject to
Stand alone residential
Associated With Zoning Use Tables
the density limits of the
and ground floor
development standards for this zone
residential to be
and only permitted within a
permitted.
structure containing commercial
uses on the ground floor.
Commercial space must be reserved
on the ground floor at a minimum of
thirty feet (30') in depth along any
street frontage. Residential uses shall
not be located on the ground floor,
except for a residential entry feature
linking the residential portion of the
development to the street.
RMC 4-4-080F.8.c.iii: Maximum
Compact parking spaces shall not
All other uses — not to
Number of Compact Spaces
account for more than:
exceed thirty-four
Outside of the UC-N1 and UC-N2
All other uses — not to exceed
Percent (34%).
Zones
thirty percent (30%).
RMC 4-4-090D.1: Refuse and
Minimum Size: A minimum of one
Four hundred and three
Recyclables Multi -family
and one-half (1-1/2) square feet per
(403.00) square feet
Developments Minimum Size
dwelling unit in multi -family
Requirements
residences shall be provided for
recyclables deposit areas, except
where the development is
participating in a City -sponsored
program in which individual recycling
bins are used for curbside collection.
A minimum of three (3) square feet
ORDINANCE NO.
ATTACHMENT B
per dwelling unit shall be provided
for refuse deposit areas. A total
minimum area of eighty (80) square
feet shall be provided for refuse and
recyclables deposit areas.
RMC 4-4-130D.2: Tree Retention
Unless exempted by critical areas,
The allowance of thirty -
and Land Clearing Regulaitons,
RMC 4-3-05005 or Shoreline Master
six (36) trees to be
Restrictions for Critical Areas —
Program Regulations, RMC 4-3-090,
removed and associated
General
no tree removal, or land clearing, or
land clearing in a Class 4
ground cover management is
stream and stream
permitted:
buffer critical area for
a,. On portions of property with
the construction of
protected critical habitats, per RMC
vehicular transportation
4-3-050K; streams and lakes, per
stream crossings as
RMC 4-3-050L; Shorelines of the
permitted by RMC 4-3-
State, per RMC 4-3-090, Renton
050L.8.a, subject to.
Shoreline Master Program
mitigation identified
Regulations; and wetlands, per RMC
within the SEPA
4-3-050M; and their associated
Environmental Review.
buffers;
•
I .
Attachment C
11,511
`�t,�.'737JrF.x#: �"` m -. µ N•4fi;�sx$,z ii tl�l x`• L�:i
i
Q w4%�3+psr k A'i'^ix,V
> W k�+44•F+.kaf.""ui t4� .F+/i 1X t 1I 'yjl�irpe.
iNJSX
10� Residential -10 DU/AC �` yr
lfl F Y�� yFaz',yz ti p y+7.,�x {t Ls ai
3 S Y w� 4>T•r� F 1 `S j '"� `• n
�(�_ f < miltl:Y '�.
� �q�Y`�- `�3'.£�JT• �P' {�,'. °s'4 '�"i'.�+<�T•'ry� A> •v C.
i "�.'nY�S,� 3,'�'"'�`,j'.yy a ` �L•w+'P "'�i! �yw,�,fTil F pR+
riS,t`rkfia
,. 1,2
t -�
n St NF,.
fnP�t
LUA09-024 PUD A.
co
CO
��•r`+y.
t�,`,r
CM o� w SE 173rd St
UCam. �5 U)
CIO
5 t
fA
_ •tip/f� .f
Zoning Map Changes
October 15, 2009 0 PUD Boundary Residential -10 DU/AC
0 160 324 V.,
Feet 0 Parcels ;: ;,_ Residential - 14 DU/AC
Zoning Residential - 4 DU/AC
1:3,200
H:ICEDIPIanninr�lGlSi N Commercial Arterial Residential - 8 DU/AC
GIS_pFnjectslvidnity_mapslrnxdsl Residential -1 DU/AC Residential Multi -Family
Iua09_024 zoning map_oct09.mxd
City of
Map produced by City of Renton (c), the City of Renton all rights Commul _fy &Economic Development
reserved. No w nties of any sort, including but not limited Alex Pietsch, Admiuislrator
to accuracy, fitness or merchantabildy, accompany this product T)ata;CrTS Analysis Services, Adriana A. Johnson, Patrick Roduin
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2009
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S 2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MAPS, AND DATA
IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton has heretofore adopted and filed a
"Comprehensive Plan" and the City Council of Renton has implemented and amended said
"Comprehensive Plan" from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports
and records; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heretofore fully recommended to the City
Council, from time to time, certain amendments to the City's "Comprehensive Plan"; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management
Act, has been required to review its "Comprehensive Plan"; and
WHEREAS, a portion, including tax parcel numbers 0001400009, 1323049010, and
1323049006 of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment M-03 Sunset Bluffs, has been continued
to the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle per the applicants request; and
WHEREAS, the City has held a public hearing on this matter on September 9, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations
to the City Council, including implementing policies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly determined after due consideration of the evidence
before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive
Plan" and
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, such modification and elements for the "Comprehensive Plan" being in the
best interest for the public benefit;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings and recitals are found to be true and correct in all
respects.
SECTION II. The following "Comprehensive Plan," elements are hereby modified,
amended and adopted in their entirety: Environment, Land Use Map, and Community Planning
as shown on Attachments A, B, and C and incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
SECTION III. The "Comprehensive Plan" Land Use element is hereby modified and
amended only in part, in the subsection entitled "Commercial/Office/Residential Land Use
Designation", as shown on Attachment D.
SECTION IV. The Community and Economic Development Administrator is hereby
authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City's "Comprehensive Plan"
and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforementioned amendments.
SECTION V. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as provided
by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City
Clerk of the City of Renton.
SECTION VI. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days
after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
�9�
Denis Law, Mayor
3
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT
GOAL
Protect and enhance Renton's natural ecosystems, natural beauty, and environmental quality.
VI- 1
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Introduction
A goal of the Washington State Growth Management Act is to use Comprehensive Plans to
protect the environment. Specifically this goal directs jurisdictions to: "Protect the
environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and
the availability of water." The purpose of the environment element is to achieve this goal. This
element provides the policy background and basis for future environmental actions by the City
of Renton as it attempts to balance urbanization, economic development, tree canopy cover,
natural area protection, and a high quality of life for all residents. Environmental policies will
be implemented through economic development decisions, natural resource management and
planning, critical areas regulations, and incentives for environmental protection.
Resource Protection
The quality of Renton's environmental resources holds great importance for the citizens.
Environmental resources, such as wetlands or wildlife habitat, are intrinsically valuable and
should be protected for the unique features that are provided. The City of Renton, unlike many
major Puget Sound cities, has several unique areas of habitat, many of which coincide with our
wetlands and water resources. The Cedar River supports major fish runs during the year.
Springbrook Creek, Honey Creek, and May Creek also provide habitat for salmonids. The Black
River Riparian Forest provides habitat for over 35 species of birds, including heron and eagles,
and many small mammals. The Cedar River, May Creek, and Panther Creek corridors have
forested, meadow, and shrub habitats that provide shelter and food for many species. Policies
that preserve these areas not only preserve their unique features, but also enhance the quality
of life and provide recreational opportunities for Renton residents.
It is important to protect natural areas for public health and safety reasons, as well as for
recreational and environmental reasons. Human and natural systems are interrelated, thus
when natural systems are threatened, human health and quality of life is threatened.
Preservation and protection of riparian corridors can prevent storm water effects such as
erosion and sedimentation. Aquifer protection policies and ordinances, limit discharges of
pollutants to Renton's water supply. For areas that have already been degraded, all efforts
should be made to naturalize them. For new areas, the natural systems should be protected.
When natural systems are protected and enhanced, human health and quality of life is
protected and enhanced.
Objective EN -A: Protect and enhance water quality of surface water resources including the
.City's lakes, rivers, major and minor creeks, and intermittent stream courses.
Policy EN-1. Manage water resources for multiple uses including recreation, fish and wildlife,
flood protection, erosion control, water supply, energy production, and open space.
Policy EN-2. Minimize erosion and sedimentation by requiring appropriate construction
techniques and resource practices.
VI- 2
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Policy EN-3. Limit discharges of pollutants such as chemicals, insecticides, pesticides, and other
hazardous wastes to surface waters.
Policy EN-4. Degraded channels, streams, creeks, and banks should be naturalized by public
programs and new development.
Objective EN-B: Preserve and protect wetlands for overall system functioning.
Policy EN-S. Achieve no overall net loss of the City's wetlands. In no case should development
activities decrease net acreage of existing wetlands.
Policy EN-6. When development may impact wetlands, the following hierarchy should be
followed in deciding the appropriate course of action:
a. avoid impacts to the wetland,
b. minimize impacts to the wetland,
c. restore the wetland when impacted,
d. recreate the wetland at a ratio which will provide for its assured viability and success,
e. enhance the functional values of an existing degraded wetland.
Policy EN-7. Protect buffers along wetlands to facilitate infiltration and maintain stable water
temperatures, provide for biological diversity, reduce amount and velocity of run-off, and
provide for wildlife habitat.
Policy EN-8. Water level fluctuations in wetlands used as part of storm water detention
systems should be similar to the fluctuations under natural conditions. The utilization,
maintenance, and storage capacity provided in existing wetlands should be encouraged.
Policy EN-9. Pursue an overall net gain of wetland functions and values by enhancing
significant wetlands and providing incentives for the enhancement of wetland functions and
values through private development.
Objective EN-C: Ensure the long-term protection of the quality and quantity of the
groundwater resources of the City of Renton in order to maintain a safe and adequate potable
water supply for the City.
Policy EN-10. Emphasize the use of open ponding and detention,vegetated swales, rain
gardens, clean roof run-off, right-of-way landscape strips, open space, and stormwater
management techniques that maximize water quality and infiltration where appropriate and
which will not endanger groundwater quality.
Policy EN-11. Acquire the most sensitive lands such as wetlands and flood plains for conversion
to parks and greenbelts.
VI- 3
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Objective EN-D: Protect and enhance wildlife habitat throughout the City.
Policy EN-12. Identify unique and significant wildlife habitat as defined by Washington State
Habitat and Species Project and ensure that buildings, roads, and other features are located on
less sensitive portions of a site.
Policy EN-13. Encourage protection of existing habitat areas through regulation and the
preservation and enlargement of existing habitat areas through development incentives.
Policy EN-14. Re-establish self- sustaining fisheries resources in appropriate rivers and creeks
through habitat improvement projects that encourage and enhance salmonid use.
Hazards
Renton is located in a geographically unique area filled with recognized hazards such as:
landslide hazards, erosion hazards, seismic hazards, steep slopes, floodways, and coal mine
hazards. The walls of the plateaus and river valleys contain both steep and erosive conditions.
Numerous landslides create costs borne by the public agencies every year and private owners
often suffer property damage from these same events. Due to the high annual rainfall and soil
conditions, erosion damage can occur on relatively level areas as well as steep ones. In addition
to natural hazards, Renton has a long history of coal mining. Although these operation have
ceased, there may be subterranean dangers that are often unnoticeable on the surface. These
policies set up standards which will protect public health, safety and welfare and allow
development to proceed in appropriate areas.
Objective EN-E: Protect the natural functions of 100 year floodplains and floodways to prevent
threats to life, property, and public safety associated with flooding hazards.
Policy EN-15. Prohibit permanent structures from developing in floodways and limit
development within the 100 year floodplain.
Policy EN-16. Emphasize non-structural methods in planning for flood prevention and damages
reduction.
Policy EN-17. Dredge the Cedar River bed within the existing engineered channel as one
method of flood control.
Objective EN-F: Reduce the potential for damage to life and property due to seismic events
and geologic hazards.
Policy EN-18. Land uses in areas subject to geologic hazards should be designed to prevent
property damage and environmental degradation before, during, and after construction.
Existing vegetation and tree canopy coverage should be preserved and enhanced to the
VI- 4
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
maximum extent possible in order to protect the integrity of natural drainage systems, existing
land forms, and maintain wildlife habitat values.
Policy EN-19. Allow land alteration only for approved development proposals or approved
mitigation efforts that will not create unnecessary erosion, undermine the support of nearby
land, or unnecessarily scar the landscape in areas subject to geologic hazards.
Policy EN-20. Protect high landslide areas from land use development and roads.
Objective EN-G: Reduce the potential for damage to life and property due to abandoned coal
mines, and return this land to productive uses.
Policy EN-21. Allow land uses to locate in coal mine hazard areas, provided the hazards are
precisely located and all significant hazards associated with the mines are eliminated, making
the site as safe as a site which has not been previously mined.
Sustainable Development
Planning for hazards, and for the protection of natural resources, are steps that clearly meet the
environment goal of the Growth Management Act. However, it is necessary to go beyond these
steps to achieve sustainable development that will ultimately enhance quality of life in the long
term. Environmental systems, whether at the scale of the global climate, or at the scale of local
forest, often change incrementally. Cumulative effects are best managed through a
combination of engineering, preservation of natural systems, education, and collective action.
Objective EN-H: Protect and promote clean air and minimize individual and cumulative noise
impacts to ensure a healthful environment.
Policy EN-22. Maintain high air quality standards through efficient land use patterns promote
air quality through reduction in emissions from industry, traffic, commercial, and residential
uses.
Policy EN-23. Analyze Renton's existing tree canopy cover, establish canopy cover goals, and
promote urban forestry programs in order to maintain healthy atmospheric conditions.
Policy EN-24. Use land use planning and development regulations to ensure that the design,
construction, and on -going operations of land uses do not create noise impacts on adjacent
land uses and activities.
Objective EN -I: Implement a stormwater management program which optimizes Renton's
water resources and promotes low impact development to combine engineering with the
preservation of natural systems.
VI- 5
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Policy EN-25. Maintain, protect, and enhance natural drainage systems and natural surface
water storage sites to protect water quality, reduce public costs, and prevent environmental
degradation.
Policy EN-26. Promote the return of precipitation to the soil at natural rates near where it falls
through development design which minimizes impermeable surface coverage and maximizing
infiltration through the exposure of natural surfaces through the use of grassy swales, trees,
landscaping, where feasible.
Objective ENA: Create a sustainable urban forest that enhances the livability of the community.
Polity EN-27. Promote development of Renton's urban forest through tree planting programs,
tree maintenance programs that favor the use of large healthy trees along streets, in parks, in
residential, commercial, and industrial areas, and through the protection and restoration of
forest ecosystems.
Policy EN-28. Require trees and other vegetation along newly constructed or reconstructed
streets to reduce impacts from development.
Policy EN-29. Establish canopy cover goals for public and private development through the
survey of forested areas and the development of site specific forest management plans.
Policy EN-30. Integrate urban forestry plans with other City plans and projects to maximize
environmental, economic, and health benefits.
Objective EN-K: Protect, restore and enhance environmental quality through land use plans
and patterns, surface water management programs, park master programs, urban forestry
programs, transportation planning, development reviews, incentive programs and work with
citizens, land owners, and public and private agencies.
Policy EN-31. Reduce the impact of new development on the environment by encouraging the
use of sustainable design techniques in public and private development, by encouraging low
impact stormwater techniques, and through certification programs such as LEED (Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design) and Built Green.
Policy EN-32. Build civic facilities and other City buildings to LEED silver standard or better.
Policy EN-33. Establish regulatory standards for sustainably developed public and private
projects, to include standards for site design and layout, construction, and on -going
maintenance and operation.
Policy EN-34. Promote elements of sustainability in development and redevelopment of
Renton's transportation network by expanding non -motorized and alternative transportation
modes.
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Policy EN-35. Establish and maintain a secondary system of corridors to protect agriculture,
forest lands, and wildlife habitat, and to provide linkages between critical areas in order to
provide for public health and safety, and provide visual relief from urban structures and
development.
Policy EN-36. Where appropriate combine environmentally sensitive areas with to provide
public access and educational opportunities.
Policy EN-37. Utilize review at the project specific level for the final identification of
environmentally sensitive or critical areas, hazardous sites or portions of sites.
Policy EN- 38. Develop the urban forestry program to maintain and expand vegetation on
public and private property in order to minimize the impact of development on natural systems
such as forests and individual trees and increase canopy cover to increase the ecosystem
services that trees and other vegetation provide.
Objective EN-L: Support and sustain educational, informational, and public involvement
programs in the City over the long term in order to encourage effective use, preservation, and
protection of Renton's resources.
Policy EN-39. Provide information for and participate in informing and educating individuals,
groups, businesses, industry, and government in the protection and enhancement of the quality
and quantity of the City's natural resources and to promote conservation.
Policy EN-40. Increase the community's understanding of the City's ecosystem and the
relationship between the overall health of the ecosystem and quality of life for Renton
residents. .
Policy EN-41. Create the long-term community commitment that will be necessary to sustain
efforts to protect, maintain, and improve the City's natural resources through educational
programs.
Policy EN-42. Educate residents adjacent to critical areas about the value of the resources
present and encourage residents to protect the vegetative cover from damage.
Objective EN-M: Increase the participation by the City of Renton in resolution of regional
ecological issues that may impact Renton residents.
Policy EN-43. Promote the use of interlocal agreements with other agencies to restrict land use
in sensitive aquifer recharge areas to minimize possible sources of pollution and the potential
for erosion, and to increase infiltration.
VI- 7
ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO.
Policy EN-44. Actively participate in regional highway planning, construction, and traffic
restrictions.
Policy EN-45. Discourage the continued use of, and hauling of waste to, the Cedar Hills landfill
through the City of Renton.
Policy EN-46. Use interlocal agreements and cooperative planning programs to coordinate,
where appropriate, with King County, Tukwila, and Kent and other agencies for stormwater
management, land use decisions, and waste water treatment.
Policy EN-47. Actively participate in non -point source pollution watershed plans including
those for the May Creek, Cedar River, and Green River Basins.
Policy EN-48. Actively participate in state and regional efforts to control the atmospheric
pollutants responsible for global climate change.
VI- 8
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
COMMUNITY PLANNING ELEMENT
GOAL
Engage in community planning to improve the livability of Renton's neighborhoods, to preserve
unique identity and create community character, to prioritize the provision of City services and
investment in infrastructure, and to provide the public with the opportunity to participate in
shaping the future of their community.
XIII-1
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
GENERAL OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Purpose
The Community Planning element envisions local residents describing how the Comprehensive
Plan and its Development Regulations will be carried out in different geographic areas of the
City. Community Planning Areas were established by the City Council after a public outreach
initiative and in consideration of a number of factors that included, but were not limited to:
shared community identity, physical features, schools, data collection units, existing
infrastructure, service areas, districts, and boundaries, and access to and from a community.
Community Plans will exemplify how the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan play
out when applied to detailed and specific conditions. Ideally, Community Plans will align the
provision of City services and the allocation of infrastructure investments with community goals
and priorities. They will indicate specific land use designations, appropriate densities, and the
design standards that should apply in individual Community Planning Areas. Preserving and
building community character while ensuring an efficient and predictable development
approval process is a central theme.
Community Planning results from a partnership between the City and the businesses, residents,
and other stakeholders of a Community Planning Area. It addresses local issues that are not in
a general Comprehensive Plan. Patterns of land use, design, traffic circulation, and services are
expressed within the Community Plan for the benefit of the social, economic, physical health,
safety, and welfare of the people in the community. Community Plans are a unifying force that
identifies local characteristics in an area by surveying population, employment, transportation,
building, and social attributes. Through the Community Planning process, communities will
decide what they want to nurture and what they want to change at the local level. Priorities
will be set for infrastructure investment and the provision of City services to implement the
Community Plan.
The purpose of Community Planning is to enhance that which the community values, as well as
to identify and assure sensible growth and development. It is possible that Community Plans
include visions that are radically different from the existing conditions, and it is possible that
Community Plans include a vision that preserves the existing character and feel of an area.
However, all Community Plans will anticipate and accommodate future growth and uphold the
responsibility of implementing the Comprehensive Plan, even if there are provisions that some
members of the community may not like. Otherwise, the Community Areas would shift
development pressures and responsibilities outside community boundaries. Community Plans
must be consistent with the overall Comprehensive Plan and the Washington State Growth
Management Act. Plans should carry preambles with clearly articulated statements of purpose
and should contain goals, policies, and principles that benefit both the local community and the
City of Renton as a whole.
Objective CP-A: Implement the goals of the City and the Growth Management Act - Foster
the abilities of communities to implement the Comprehensive Plan within the Community
Planning Areas of the City of Renton.
XIII-2
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
Policy CP-1. Community Plans shall apply polices that supplement and refine the goals,
objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan within the Community Planning Areas.
Policy CP-2. Community Plans will make recommendations on land use designations, design
standards, and capital improvements within the Community Planning Areas using the policies of
the Comprehensive Plan and Title IV Development Regulations.
Policy CP-3. Community plans will be used to align the provision of City services and
infrastructure investment with community goals and priorities.
Policy CP-4. The City will utilize an effective communication system that keeps people in
Community Planning Areas informed at the beginning, as well as, during the process of creating
a Community Plan. After plans are adopted, the City will continue to communicate with the
people of Community Planning Areas regarding proposed developments and policy decisions
that may affect their Community Plan or Community Planning Area.
Objective CP-B: Foster community character and identity - Foster community character and
preserve the unique identities of neighborhoods and Community Planning Areas.
Policy CP-S. Community Plans shall involve the people of the community in plan development
and amendment. This includes coordinating with existing recognized neighborhood
associations, business associations, and other community groups, as well as business owners
and community residents.
Policy CP-6. Community Plans shall articulate a vision for the community and identify features
and characteristics of communities to retain, develop, preserve, enhance, or correct. The plans
shall focus on policy choices and regulatory options that can be effectively implemented and
shown to be beneficial and desirable for the community.
Policy CP-7. Community Plans shall use the Comprehensive Plan policies written to achieve
environmental protection, create open space, provide affordable housing, and accomplish
other Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives.
Policy CP-8. Community Plans shall provide for a mix of land uses, housing types, and densities,
while meeting the growth targets for the City.
Policy CP-9. Community Plans may identify design features to be prioritized in capital facilities,
multi -family residential development, commercial and industrial areas, and in landscaping.
Design features may include site planning, building design, and other features which affect the
character of the community.
Policy CP-10. Community Plans shall recognize that unique districts and neighborhoods exist
within the Community Planning Areas and may include provisions for subarea or neighborhood
plans for these areas within the context of the Community Plan.
XIII-3
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
Objective CP-C: New Community Plans and updates - Support communities in the
development of new Community Plans and in the update of existing Community Plans.
Policy CP-11. Community Planning Areas are defined by the Community Planning Area Map
adopted by the City Council. This map should not contain any gaps or overlaps between the
planning area boundaries.
Policy CP-12. Community Plans will include public outreach in a variety of formats, which may
include, but is not limited to: community workshops, City sponsored open -house events,
Commission and Council meetings, and integration into other community events.
Policy CP-13. Community Plans will be initiated by the City Council, with guidance from the
Mayor and Planning Commission, in order to implement objectives, principles, and standards of
the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy CP-14. During the Community Planning process, innovative and updated information
should be shared with the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee
of the City Council to determine if there is a need or desire for changes citywide.
Policy CP-15. Communities will be offered the opportunity to update their Community Plans on
a regular basis.
Objective CP-D: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations -
Ensure consistency between the Comprehensive Plan, Community Plans, and Development
Regulations.
Policy CP-16. Establish a process for resolving land use conflicts within communities and with
the Comprehensive Plan, that includes an opportunity for the participation of all stakeholders in
coming up with a solution.
Policy CP-17. Community Plans shall consider land uses and other growth related issues in
adjacent Community Planning Areas (or in a neighboring jurisdiction, as applicable) during the
planning process and in making recommendations.
Policy CP-18. Community Plans should use existing Comprehensive Plan land use designations
and zoning classifications rather than create new designations. New Comprehensive Plan
designations and zoning should only be created if:
• existing classifications are inadequate to implement the community's vision;
• new classifications are consistent with citywide policies for growth and land use; and
• new classifications are beneficial and desirable citywide
Policy CP-19. Recommendations on regulation changes shall be integrated into Title IV of
Renton's Municipal Code (the Development Regulations) in order to achieve a unified,
consistent code.
XIII-4
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
Policy CP-20. Redundant and inconsistent regulations, procedures, and overlays should be
eliminated in Community Plan Areas.
Policy CP-21. Implement Community Plans through land use regulations and administrative
decisions where possible, and through capital facilities provisions and other public programs, as
applicable.
Policy CP-22. Use Community Plan policies as guidelines for identifying mitigation and
unacceptable impacts for projects and development proposals.
XIII-5
ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE NO.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS MAP
The Community Planning Areas Map has been adopted to show ten Community Planning Areas
in the City of Renton and its Potential Annexation Area. This map was initially created in a
public outreach effort in 2009, which included a mapping workshop hosted at the annual
Neighborhood Program Neighbor to Neighbor meeting. At this meeting over 100 Renton
residents were given information about the Community Planning effort and criteria to guide the
development of Community Planning Areas citywide. Nine different maps were produced.
Staff and elected officials consolidated the maps into a single map that was then publicly
reviewed before the Planning Commission and City Council. These lines are expected to be
used as the basis for the initiation of the Community Planning process. Boundaries should not
be considered final until the adoption of the Community Plan.
XIII-6
x
Q
f
�
§ �
2K
ƒ \
§ƒ#§
9
di
�
\
!� �!
\! N
2
: :
.....
g
c
�
@
ATTACHMENT D ORDINANCE NO.
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
Purpose Statement: The Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) designation provides
opportunities for large-scale office, commercial, retail, and multi -family projects developed
through a master plan and site plan process incorporation significant site amenities and/or
gateway features. COR sites are typically transitions from an industrial use to a more intensive
land use. The sites offer redevelopment opportunities on Lake Washington and/or the Cedar
River. Commercial/Office/Residential zoning implements the COR land use designation.
Objective LU-CCC: Development at Commercial/Office/Residential designations should be
cohesive, high quality, landmark developments that are integrated with natural amenities. The
intention is to create a compact, urban development with high amenity values that creates a
prominent identity.
Policy LU-270. Designate Commercial/Office/Residential in locations meeting the following
criteria:
1) There is the potential for redevelopment, or a sufficient amount of vacant land to
encourage significant concentration of development;
2) The COR site could function as a gateway to the City;
3) COR sites should be located on major transit and transportation routes; and
4) The COR location has significant amenity value, such as water access, that can support
landmark development.
Policy LU-271. Consistent with the location criteria, Commercial/Office/Residential designations
may be placed on property adjacent to, or abutting, residential, commercial, industrial
designations or publicly owned properties. COR designations next to higher intensity zones such
as industrial, or next to public uses, may provide a transition to less intense designations in the
vicinity. Site design of COR should consider the long-term retention of adjacent or abutting
industrial or public uses.
Policy LU-272. Uses in Commercial/Office/Residential designations should include mixed -use
complexes consisting of office, and/or residential uses, recreational and cultural facilities, hotel
and convention center type development, technology research and development facilities; and
corporate headquarters.
Policy LU-273. Commercial uses such as retail and services should support the primary uses of
the site and be architecturally and functionally integrated into the development.
Policy LU-274. Commercial development, excluding big -box, may be a primary use in a
Commercial/Office/Residential designation, if:
1) It provides significant economic value to the City;
2) It is sited in conjunction with small-scale, multiple businesses in a "business district;"
ATTACHMENT D ORDINANCE NO.
3) It is designed with the scale and intensity envisioned for the COR; and
4) It is part of a proposed master plan development.
Policy LU-275. Individual properties may have a single use if they can be developed at the scale
and intensity envisioned for the COR designation, or if proposed as part of a phased
development and multi -parcel proposal that includes a mix of uses.
Policy LU-276. Sites that have significant limitations on redevelopment due to environmental,
access, and/or land assembly constraints should be granted flexibility of use combinations and
development standards through the master plan process.
Policy LU-277. Adjacent properties within a designated COR should be combined for master
planning purposes and public review regardless of ownership.
Policy LU-278. Master plans should coordinate the mix and compatibility of uses, residential
density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features,
signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing regardless of ownership of individual
parcels.
Policy LU-279. Residential densities at COR designated sites should provide the flexibility to
allow for high density residential development, that could support the potential onsite
commercial uses and, at the same time, provide for the opportunity for mixed -use
developments that can support the City's employment goals. The same area used for
commercial and office development may also be used to calculate residential density.
Policy LU-280. Commercial/Office/Residential master plans should be guided by design criteria
specific to the location, context, and scale of the designated COR. COR Design Guidelines should
fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations
for the various components of each proposed project within the COR development.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF
RENTON (SW SUNSET BOULEVARD) FROM RESIDENTIAL -TEN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (R-10) TO INDUSTRIAL LIGHT (IL), FILE NO. LUA-08-146 (CPA 2009-M-03).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property herein below described in has heretofore been zoned as
Residential Ten Units Per Net Acre (R-10); and
WHEREAS, the property owner initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification
of said properties; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and the public hearing having been held thereon on or about
September 9, 2009; and
WHEREAS, this matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all
parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
r
SECTION I. The following property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to
Industrial Light (IL) as herein below specified. The Planning Division is hereby authorized and
directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence the rezoning,
to -wit:
See Attachment "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION If. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5)
days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1588:11/4/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
2
-�Department of Community
' & Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Data/GIS Analysis Services
Adriana Johnson
N
November 4, 2009
300 600
Feet
1:4,800
Produced by City of Renton (c) 2009, the City of Renton all rights
reserved. No warranties of any son, including but not limited to
accuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product.
Attachment A
CPA 2009 - M03: Sunset Bluffs
Rezone From R-10 to IL
ORezone Boundary IL Ught Industrial R-10 Residential 10du/acre
..a.. I t
I�.J CRY Umfts IM Medium Industrial r� RC Resource Conservation
Zoning Designations ® IH Heavy Industrial RMF Residential Multi Family
CO Commercial Office RA Residential 4du/acre
CVCentervilage RBResidentlalOdWaae
File Name:
a
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF
RENTON (MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) FROM RESIDENTIAL -FOUR UNITS PER NET
ACRE (R-4) TO RESIDENTIAL -EIGHT UNITS PER NET ACRE (R-8) ZONING, FILE NO.
LUA08-145 (CPA 2009-M-04).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property herein below described in has heretofore been zoned as
Residential Four Units Per Net Acre (R-4); and
WHEREAS, the property owner initiated a proceeding and the City expanded the area to
include the Summerfield Neighborhood, an additional one -hundred and twelve (112)
properties for change of zone classification of said properties; and
WHEREAS, This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and the public hearing having been held thereon on or about
September 9, 2009; and
WHEREAS, this matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all
parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition;
1
ORDINANCE NO.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to
Residential Eight Units Per Net Acre (R-8) as herein below specified. The Planning Division is
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to
evidence the rezoning, to -wit:
See Attachment "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5)
days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1589:9/29/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
2
ryp c
� ffi
SW2036 �
�h
�5yy20�70
BBSW20290 ,
8056920200
B85W20270
885W20250
o ffi N
:8 a�
Attachment A
i
iltl�}�
o g
., Renton I
�
o
090120
I'(, I S
W901 0
- 8856890160 8856890170
8856890250
e86fi890700
568 130 -
6856890150 8656890180
5689025
56890290 0
132305902E
i6920051 �'
56920010
_ SW9024
5689077 ..
Sys
�5�
5689028
JS
8856920020
ffi o
Isi8
ffi
ffi
ffi
tit
o
Z9
a 10
Y a°
9Department of Community
& Economic Development CPA 2009 - M04: Valley View and Summerfield
Alex Pietsch, Administrator Rezone From R-4 to R-8
Data/GIS Analysis Services
Adriana Johnson " (Z)City Limits ® RC Resource Conservation
October 7, 2009 i1.-i PAA Boundary R-8 Residential 8du/acre
0 300 600
Feet 0 Parcel RMH Residential Manufactured Homes
1:4,800
Produced by City of Renton (c) 2009. the City of Renton all rights File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\complan_amendment\2009\cpa09_m04
reserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited to \mxds\cpa2009_M04 rezone from R10_to_R8_attachmentA.mxd
accuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. — —
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF
RENTON (NE 24t" STREET) FROM RESIDENTIAL -FOUR UNITS PER NET ACRE (R-4)
TO RESIDENTIAL -EIGHT UNITS PER NET ACRE (R-8) ZONING, FILE NO. LUA-09-
095 (CPA 2009-M-05).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property herein below described in has heretofore been zoned as
Residential Four Units Per Net Acre (R-4); and
WHEREAS, the property owner initiated a proceeding and the City expanded the area to
an additional two properties for change of zone classification of said properties; and
WHEREAS, This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and the public hearing having been held thereon on or about
September 9, 2009; and
WHEREAS, this matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all
parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION le The following property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to
Residential Eight Units Per Net Acre (R-8) as herein below specified. The Planning Division is
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to
evidence the rezoning, to -wit:
See Attachment "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days
after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1590:9/29/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
2
Attachment A
NE 25th PI
O O O
O O O
f2 M <2
8132100010 1 cco co
Department of Community CPA 2009 - M05: Cowan Rezone
'! ' & Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator Rezone from R-4 to R-8
Data/GIS Analysis Services ® Rezone Boundary
Addana Johnson Parcels
October7, 2009 Zoning Designation
0 125 250 Feet N R-4 Residential 4du/acre
1:2,000 R-8 Residential 8du/acre
Produced by City of Renton (c) 2009, the City of Renton all rights
reserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited to File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\complan_amendment\2009\cpa09_m0s
accuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. mxds\cpa2009_M05_cawan_rezone from R4_to R8_attachmentA.mxd
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS, AND
CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF
ORDINANCE NO.4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON- TO AMEND DENSITY REGULATIONS IN THE
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL (COR) ZONE, TO ALLOW BONUS DENSITY
UP TO 75 DWELLING UNITS PER NET ACRE.
WHEREAS, lands with the Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) zoning designation are
located near or on shorelines of the state; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the value these waterways provide to its residents; and
WHEREAS, these waterways should be protected and enhanced or restored to maintain
or increase the value they provide to the built and natural environment; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to permit increased density when additional site amenities are
provided though site development, including, but not limited to, public access and
enhancement/restoration of shorelines of the state; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to permit bonus density only when the same or better results
occur though development than would occur under standard criteria; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning
text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended;
and
1
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on or about September 9,
2009, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard
appearing in support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-120B, Development Standards For Commercial Zoning
Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended so the "Maximum Net Residential Density" row in the COR
column is amended as shown in Attachment "A".
SECTION II. Subsection 4-9-065B, Applicability, of. Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
The density bonus review procedure and review criteria are applicable to
applicants who request bonuses in the zones which specifically authorize density
bonuses in chapter 4-2 RMC. This Section of chapter 4-9 RMC contains density
bonus procedures and review criteria for the residential uses in the R-14, RM-U,
and COR Zones, as well as assisted living in all zones where it is permitted.
SECTION III. Subsection 4-9-065D, Bonus Allowances and Review Criteria, of Chapter
9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled
"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended shown in
Attachment "B".
i6
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5)
days after publication. .
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1591:9/30/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
3
ATTACHMENT A
RMC 4-2-120B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS
CD
CO
COR
DENSITY (Net Density in Dwelling Units per Net Acre) (Continued)
Maximum
100 dwelling units per
NA
50 dwelling units per net acre, except that
Net
net acre.9
density of up to 75 dwelling units per net
Residential
Density may be
acre may be permitted subject to conditions
Density
increased to 150
in RMC 4-9-065, Density Bonus Review.9
dwelling units per net
Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the
acre subject to
maximum density may be allowed subject to
Administrative
conditions of RMC 4-9-065.
Conditional Use
The same area used for commercial and
approval.
office development can also be used to
Assisted living bonus:
calculate residential density. Where
1.5 times the maximum
commercial and/or office areas are utilized
density may be allowed
in the calculation of density, the City may
subject to conditions of
require restrictive covenants to ensure the
RMC 4-9-065.
maximum density is not exceeded should
the property be subdivided or in another
manner made available for separate lease or
conveyance.
ATTACHMENT A- 1
4-9-065 DENSITY BONUS REVIEW:
D. BONUS ALLOWANCES AND REVIEW CRITERIA:
The following table lists the conditions under which additional density or alternative bulk standards may be achieved:
R-14 ZONE
RM-U ZONE
COR ZONE
ASSISTED LIVING
Density and Unit
The bonus provisions are intended
The bonus
The bonus provisions are
The bonus provisions are
Size Bonus —
to allow greater flexibility in the
provisions are
intended to allow greater
intended to allow assisted
Purpose:
implementation of the purpose of
intended to
densities within the COR zone.
living to develop with higher
the R-14 designation. Bonus criteria
allow greater
Bonus criteria encourage
densities, but with a building
encourage provision of aggregated
densities within
affordable housing, mixed use
footprint and scale of
open space and rear access parking
the portion of
development, aggregated open
building that would be
in an effort to stimulate provision of
the RM-U zone
space, superior architecture and
expected for other multi -
higher amenity neighborhoods and
located within
site design, and significant
family structures in the
project designs which address
the Urban
environmental enhancement
applicable zone. It is
methods of reducing the size and
Design District
and/or restoration. Applicants
expected that the density
bulk of structures. Applicants
and north of
requesting such bonuses must
bonus will be achieved with
requesting such bonuses must
South 2nd
demonstrate that the same or
no variances to the
demonstrate that the same or
Street for those
better results will occur as a
development regulations of
better results will occur as a result
development
result of creative design
the applicable zone.
of creative design solutions that
proposals that
solutions that would occur with
would occur with uses developed
provide high
uses developed under standard
under standard criteria.
quality design
criteria.
and amenities.
Maximum
1 to 4 additional dwelling units per
Up to 25
Up to 25 dwelling units per net
The units in a project that
Additional Units
net acre. Densities of greater than
dwelling units .
acre. Densities of greater than
are for assisted living are
Per Acre:
18 units per net acre are prohibited.
per net acre.
75 dwelling units per net acre
allowed to develop at 1.5
Densities of
are prohibited.
times the maximum density
greater than
of the zone the project is in.
ATTACHMENT B - 1
100 dwelling
units per net
acre are
prohibited.
In the R-1 and R-10 zones
the maximum density for
assisted living shall be 18
units/net acre.
Maximum
Dwelling units permitted per
NA
NA
Projects that include both
Allowable Bonus
structure may be increased as
assisted living and
Dwelling Unit
follows:
independent living may only
Mix/Arrangemen
(i) Dwellings Limited to 3 Attached:
apply the density bonus
t:
A maximum of 4 units per structure,
ratio to the units that are
with a maximum structure length of
built as assisted living units.
100 feet.
(ii) Dwellings Limited to 6 Attached:
A maximum of 8 units per structure
with a maximum structural height
of 35 feet, or 3 stories and a
maximum structural length of 115
feet.
Bonus Criteria:
Bonuses may be achieved
Development
To qualify for bonus density the
Assisted living units must be
independently or in combination. To
projects within
applicant shall provide either:
designated for people who
qualify for one or both bonuses the
the applicable
are at least 55 years of age.
applicant shall provide either:
area that meet
(i) Affordable Housing: Twenty
The definitions of Assisted
(i) Alley and/or rear access and
both the
percent (20%) or more of the
Living in RMC 4-11-010 and
parking for 50% of detached, semi-
"Minimum
proposed dwelling units within
Dwelling Multi -Family,
attached, or townhouse units
requirements"
the development are affordable
Assisted Living in RMC 4-11-
(parcels abutting an existing alley
and at least
to low income households, with
040 must be met.
are required to take alley access
one
incomes at or below fifty
and shall not qualify for the bonus
"Guideline" in
percent (50%) of the area
based upon this provision), or
each of the
median income, or
(ii) Civic uses such as a community
following four
meeting hall, senior center,
categories:
(ii) Open Space: Provide
recreation center, or other similar
Building Siting
increased common outdoor
ATTACHMENT B - 2
uses as determined by the Zoning
and Design;
open space areas or
Administrator, or
Parking, Access,
recreational facilities beyond
(iii) A minimum of 5% of the net
and Circulation;
standard code requirements.
developable area of the project in
Landscaping/Re
The open space shall abut the
aggregated common outdoor open
creation/Comm
shoreline, where applicable.
space. Common outdoor open
on Space; and
The open space shall provide a
space areas may be used for any of
Building
quality environment through
the following purposes
Architectural
either, passive or active
(playgrounds, picnic
Design
recreation facilities, and
shelters/facilities and equipment,
applying to
attractive common areas,
village greens/square, trails,
Area "A" of the
including accessibility from
corridors or natural). Structures
Urban Design
buildings by public walkways.
such as kiosks, benches, fountains
District located
and maintenance equipment
in RMC 4-3-100
In addition, in order to qualify
storage facilities are permitted;
shall be
for a bonus, developments shall
provided, that they serve and/or
permitted a
also incorporate the features
promote the use of the open space.
maximum
described below:
To qualify as common open space,
density of 100
an area must meet each of the
dwelling units
(iii) Overall Design: Provide a
following conditions:
per net acre.
development design that is
function as a focal point for the
superior to the design that
development,
would result from development
have a maximum slope of 10%,
of the subject property under
have a minimum width of 25',
standard code requirements.
except for trails or corridors,
Including but not limited to,
be located outside the right-of-way,
superior architectural design,
be improved with landscaping in
placement, relationship or
public areas, and
orientation of structures and/or
be maintained by the homeowner's
enhanced ground plane textures
association if the property is
or colors, and
subdivided, or by the management
ATTACHMENT B - 3
organization as applied to the
property if the property is not
(iv) Ground floor commercial
subdivided.
shall be provided at appropriate
levels given the overall project
design, and
(v) Environmental
Enhancements:
(a) Significant
environmental
enhancement and/or
restoration is provided that
protects critical areas
and/or shorelines, that
would not be protected to
the same degree otherwise
or
(b) Design which results in a
sustainable development;
such as, LEED certification,
energy efficiency, use of
alternative energy
resources, Low Impact
Development techniques,
etc...
Bonus Criteria
(iv) Provision of a minimum of 2
(continued):
units of affordable housing per net
developable acre (fractional results
shall be rounded up to the next
ATTACHMENT B - 4
whole number).
In addition, in order to qualify for a
bonus, developments shall also
incorporate a minimum of 3
features described below:
(i) Architectural design which
incorporates enhanced building
entry features (e.g., varied design
materials, arbors and/or trellises,
cocheres, gabled roofs).
,
(ii) Active common recreation
amenities such as picnic facilities,
gazebos, sports courts, recreation
center, pool, spa/jacuzzi.
(iii) Enhanced ground plane textures
or colors (e.g., stamped patterned
concrete, cobblestone, or brick at all
building entries, courtyards, trails or
sidewalks).
(iv) Building or structures
incorporating bonus units shall have
no more than 75% of the garages on
a single facade.
(v) Surface parking lots containing
not more than 6 parking stalls
separated from other parking areas
by landscaping with a minimum
width of 15 feet.
(vi) Site design incorporating a
package of at least 3 amenities
which enhance neighborhood
ATTACHMENT B - 5
character, such as coordinated
lighting (street or building), mailbox
details, address and signage details,
and street trees as approved by the
Reviewing Official.
General
NA
NA
NA
NA
Provisions:
ATTACHMENT B - 6
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 4, WATER, AND CHAPTER 5, SEWER, OF TITLE VIII (HEALTH AND
SANITATION) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON-, TO ALLOW FOR
ADJUSTMENTS TO CURRENT UTILITY RATES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 8-4-24A.1, Fire Protection Charges, of Chapter 4, Water, of
Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. Fire Protection Charges: The private fire protection charges are
hereby fixed in the following schedule:
Meter
Rate
1 inch
$4.16
1 % inch
$4.64
2 inch
$5.97
3 inch
$15.76
4 inch
$19.40
6 inch
$27.87
8 inch
$37.53
10 inch
$48.43
SECTION II. Subsection 8-4-31B, Metered Rates, of Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII
(Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Metered Rates:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
1. The minimum rates for metered water supplied within the City in
one (1) month or fractional period thereof are hereby fixed in the following
schedule:
Size of
service
Single-family/duplex,
multi -family,
non-residential
Private irrigation, city
irrigation
3/4"
$11.66
$7.02
1"
$24.15
$12.53
11/2"
$44.62
$21.40
2"
$69.92
$32.77
3"
$143.67
$69.36
4"
$ 219.24
$103.14
6"
$427.56
$195.35
8"
$836.94
$427.49
10"
$1,247.52
$549.70
12"
$1,815.55
$793.78
2. Commodity Rates: Three (3) consumption blocks will be established
for single family and duplex customers. The size of the first block will be less than
five hundred (500) cubic feet of water consumed per month. The second block
will be five hundred (500) to one thousand (1,000) cubic feet of water consumed
per month. The third block will be over one thousand (1,000) cubic feet of water
consumed per month. The rates for these three (3) blocks are as follows:
Less than 500 cubic feet
$1.68
500 —1,000 cubic feet
$2.26
Over 1,000 cubic feet
$2.85
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Customers that are multi -family, non-residential, private irrigation and
City irrigation will pay for consumption at the following rates per one hundred
(100) cubic feet.
Multi -family
$2.18
Non-residential
$2.31
Private Irrigation
$3.70
City Irrigation
$2.60
SECTION III. Subsection 8-4-31C.1, Low Income Seniors, of Chapter 4, Water, of Title
VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. Low -Income Seniors: A "low-income senior citizen" is defined as a
person sixty-one (61) years of age or older who resides in a single-family dwelling
that is separately metered with a City water meter for water usage, either as
owner, purchaser, or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her
spouse or co -tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for low-
income rate eligibility. The annual income threshold for eligibility for low-income
rate shall be adjusted each calendar year, using the Income Guidelines for King
County as provided annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and King County's qualifying income criteria for a senior
citizen/disability property tax exemption. Any household with a disposable
income of thirty percent (30%) or less of the median household income for King
County and qualified for a subsidy prior to May 31, 2008, will be eligible for a
seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy. All other households with an annual
disposable income less than King County's maximum qualifying income for a
3
ORDINANCE NO.
senior citizen/disability property tax exemption are eligible for a fifty percent
(50%) rate subsidy. For the calendar year 2010 those figures for a seventy-five
percent (75%) rate subsidy shall be seventeen thousand seven hundred dollars
($17,700) or less per annum for single occupancy and twenty thousand two
hundred and fifty dollars ($20,250) or less per annum for double occupancy, and
thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) or less per annum for a fifty percent (50%)
rate subsidy. For households with more than two (2) individuals qualifying under
Subsection C of this Section, an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000) is added
to the income threshold per qualifying individual.
SECTION IV. Subsection a of subsection 8-4-31C.4, Low -Income Rates, of Chapter 4,
Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. For a seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy:
(1) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualified as
economically disadvantaged, and were on this low-income rate prior to August 1,
1994, the rate for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which
such eligible person or persons permanently reside is one dollar and thirty-eight
cents ($1.38) per month, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per
month. Any water consumption over nine hundred (900) cubic feet per month
shall be charged as provided in Subsections A and B of this Section.
(2) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualify as
economically disadvantaged, and were on this low-income rate after August 1,
4
ORDINANCE NO.
1994, and prior to May 31, 2008, the rate for water service relating to such
single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons permanently
reside is two dollars and eighty-nine cents ($2.89) per month, limited to nine
hundred (900) cubic4feet of water per month. Any water consumption over nine
hundred (900) cubic feet per month shall be charged as provided in Subsections
A and B of this Section, except for those persons who qualify under home kidney
dialysis. These customers are limited to one thousand seven hundred (1,700)
cubic feet of water per month before any excess is charged as provided in
Subsections A and B of this Section.
SECTION V. Subsection 8-5-15A, Disposal Rates, of Chapter 5, Sewer, of Title Vill
(Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Disposal Rates: The monthly rates and charges for sewage disposal
service shall be as follows:
1. Single -Family: Sixteen dollars and eighty-two cents ($16.82).
2. All Other Users: A base charge of two dollars and fifty-four cents
($2.54) plus one dollar and ninety cents ($1.90) per month for each one hundred
(100) cubic feet of water used, but not less than sixteen dollars and eighty-two
cents ($16.82) per month.
3. Charges For Sewer Service Without City Water: In the event that
water obtained from sources other than purchased from the City is either
5
ORDINANCE NO.
discharged or drained into the sewer system, users shall be charged by one of
the two (2) following methods:
a. For single-family residences, sixteen dollars and eighty-two
cents ($16.82) per month.
b. For other than single-family dwellings, the Public Works
Administrator or designee shall install a water meter into such private water
system at cost to property owners, and the method of billing shall be in
compliance with Subsection A.2 of this Section.
SECTION VI. Subsection 8-5-15D, Additional Charges, of Chapter 5, Sewer, of Title VIII
(Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. Additional Charges: In addition to the foregoing charges specified in this
Section, the following rates shall be charged:
1. A charge of thirty-one dollars and ninety cents ($31.90) per month and a
rate adjustment charge of one dollar and sixteen cents ($1.16) per month payable to
King County Wastewater for each single-family dwelling unit.
2. A charge of thirty-one dollars and ninety cents ($31.90) per month and a
rate adjustment charge of one dollar and sixteen cents ($1.16) per month payable to
King County Wastewater for each seven hundred fifty (750) cubic feet, or any fraction
thereof, of water used for all users other than single-family.
3. Any additional charges hereafter imposed by King County
Wastewater under the "Industrial Cost Recovery" or "Industrial Waste
R
ORDINANCE NO.
Surcharge" programs required under the FWPCA (PL 92-500), Section 204, or as
same may be amended hereafter, plus fifteen percent (15%) thereof as an
additional charge for the City's cost of implementing such programs.
4. Senior and/or disabled low income rates:
a. For a seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy:
(1) Senior and/or disabled low-income citizens who qualified
under RMC 8-4-31C for low-income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for
a nonsubsidized rate of thirty-one dollars and ninety cents ($31.90) per month
and a rate adjustment charge of one dollar and sixteen cents ($1.16) per month
payable to King County Wastewater, and a subsidized rate of one dollar forty-
five cents ($1.45) per month for City sewer charges for a total of thirty-four
dollars and fifty-one cents ($34.51).
(2) Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-
4-31C for low-income rates after August 1, 1994, and prior to May 31, 2008, are
eligible for a nonsubsidized rate of thirty-one dollars and ninety cents ($31.90)
per month and a rate adjustment charge of one dollar and sixteen cents ($1.16)
per month payable to King County Wastewater, and a subsidized rate of four
dollars and twenty-one cents ($4.21) per month for City sewer charges for a total
of thirty-seven dollars and twenty-seven cents ($37.27).
b. All other senior and/or disabled citizens qualifying under RMC
8-4-31C for low-income rates after May 31, 2008, are eligible for a fifty percent
(50%) subsidy equal to a nonsubsidized rate of thirty-one dollars and ninety
7
ORDINANCE NO.
cents ($31.90) per month and a rate adjustment charge of one dollar and sixteen
cents ($1.16) per month payable to King County Wastewater, and a subsidized
rate of eight dollars and forty-one cents ($8.41) per month for City sewer
charges for a total of forty-one dollars and forty-seven cents ($41.47).
SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2010.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1595: 11/5/09:scr
I:J
Denis Law, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER
1, GARBAGE, OF TITLE VIII (HEALTH & SANITATION) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON-, RELATED TO YEAR 2010 SERVICES AND UTILITY RATES FOR ALL
CUSTOMER CLASSES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 8-1-10, Rates for Services, of Chapter 1, Garbage, of Title VIII
(Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows:
8-1-10: RATES FOR SERVICES:
The following schedule is hereby adopted as the monthly charges to be paid to
the City for services rendered in each category:
A. Residential Customers:
1. For garbage cans, carts, and/or garbage units:
Every Other Week Garbage & Recycling,
Weekly Yard Waste & Food Scraps
Service Level
2010 Renton
SWU Monthly
Rates
Mini Cart (20 Gallon)
$11.65
35 Gallon Contractor Cart
$19.15
45 Gallon Contractor Cart
$24.14
64 Gallon Contractor Cart
$33.61
96 Gallon Contractor Cart
$49.61
Senior Mini Cart Rate (75% subsidy)/Existing
$2.91
Senior Mini Cart Rate (50% subsidy)
$5.83
Senior 35 Gallon Cart Rate (50% subsidy)
$9.58
Senior 45 Gallon Cart Rate (50% subsidy)
$12.07
Senior 64 Gallon Cart Rate (50% subsidy)
$16.81
Senior 96 Gallon Cart Rate (50% subsidy)
$24.81
Extra garbage, up to 15 gallons per unit/per pickup
$3.56
1
ORDINANCE NO.
Extra yard waste cart rental $1.98
Return Trip Charge per pickup $5.17
2. Residential customers are allowed to change their garbage service
level once per year without incurring an administrative fee. Each garbage service
level change per year above the once per year allowance will result in an
administrative fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). The one (1) year period shall
begin January 1 and shall end December 31 each year.
3. Senior and/or disabled customers who qualified under Subsection
8-4-31C of this Title for low-income rates for seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy
prior to May 31, 2008, are eligible for a two dollar and ninety-one cents ($2.91)
fee for 20 Gallon Mini Cart service. For services other than Mini Cart service, the
rate schedule as provided in Subsection 8-1-10A.1. will apply. All senior and/or
disabled customers qualifying under Subsection 8-4-31C for low income rates
after May 31, 2008, are eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy of the charges
for the service level selected.
4. Premium Weekly Collection: Single-family residential customers
may elect to have their garbage collected weekly for an additional fee of
nineteen dollars and fifty-five cents ($19.55) per month. This fee will be added
to the monthly garbage billing as an extra Premium Service Fee.
5. Miscellaneous Services: The City of Renton offers miscellaneous
services at the following rates:
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Services Cost per Pick Up
On -Call Bulky Waste Collection
White Goods, except Refrigerators/Freezers/unit
$62.60
Refrigerators/Freezers per unit
$66.98
Sofas/Chairs per unit
$58.21
Mattresses per unit
$56.02
B. Commercial Customers:
1. Multi -Family Carts: Customers have the following cart -based services
available:
Multi -Family Cart Service Level
2010 SWU
Monthly Rates
Weekly
Commercial
Can and
Cart
One 20 Gallon Mini Cart
$20.80
One 35 Gallon Garbage Cart
$27.0
One 64 Gallon Contractor Cart
$40.0
One 96 Gallon Contractor Cart
$53.0
Extra Cans or Units
$5.87
Weekly Yard Waste Collection Cart
$39.11
2. Commercial Carts: Customers have the following Contractor cart -
based services available:
Commercial Cart Service Level
2010 SW U
Monthly Rates
Weekly
Commercial
Can and
Cart
One 20 Gallon Mini Cart
$32.85
One 35 Gallon Garbage Cart
$36.52
One 64 Gallon Contractor Cart
$46.93
One 96 Gallon Contractor Cart
$57.6
Extra Cans or Units
$5.641
Weekly Yard Waste Collection Cart
$37.61
3. Hydraulically Handled Containers One (1) — Eight (8) Yards: The
rate for the handling of hydraulically handled containers approved by the City's
3
ORDINANCE NO.
contractor and the City for use by commercial, industrial and multiple -family
residence establishments shall be as follows:
a. Monthly Rates:
Commercial Service Level
2010 SWU
Monthly Rates
Commercial
1 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week
$98.57
Detachable
1 Cubic Yard, 2 pickups/week
$185.12
Container
1 Cubic Yard, 3 pickups/week
$271.68
(loose)
1 Cubic Yard, 4 pickups/week
$358.23
1 Cubic Yard, 5 pickups/week
$444.78
1.5 Cubic Yards, 1 pickup/week
$135.12
1.5 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$258.23
1.5 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$381.3
1.5 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$504.45
1.5 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
$627.55
2 Cubic Yard, 1 pickup/week
$170.35
2 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$328.68
2 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$487.01
2 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$645.3
2 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
$803.67
3 Cubic Yards, 1 pickup/week
$242.38
3 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$472.75
3 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$703.12
3 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$933.49
3 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
$1,163.86
4 Cubic Yards, 1 pickup/week
$314.29
4 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$616.57
4 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$918.86
4 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$1,221.13
4 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
$1,523.41
6 Cubic Yards, 1 pickup/week
$456.00
6 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$899.99
6 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$1 343.98
6 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$1,787.97
6 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
$2,231.96
8 Cubic Yards, 1 pickup/week
$596.87
8 Cubic Yards, 2 pickups/week
$1,181.73
8 Cubic Yards, 3 pickups/week
$1,766.58
8 Cubic Yards, 4 pickups/week
$2,351.4
4
ORDINANCE NO.
8 Cubic Yards, 5 pickups/week
Extra loose cubic yard, per pickup
$2,936.
$19.
Commercial Service Level
2010 SWU
Monthly Rates
Commercial
Detachable
Container
(Compacted)
1 Cubic Yard Compactor
$235.09
1.5 Cubic Yards Compactor
$339.73
2 Cubic Yards Compactor
$436.62
3 Cubic Yards Compactor
$643.03
4 Cubic Yards Compactor
$849.71
6 Cubic Yards Compactor
$1,262.47
b. Rental Rates: Rental rates for one (1) — eight (8) yards
containers will be paid in the monthly rates.
c. Minimum Pickups: Minimum pickups for containers and
compactors between one (1) — eight (8) yards will be once per week.
4. Temporary containers are rented and billings are handled directly
by Waste Management, Inc.
5. Extra Charges:
a. The following extra charges will apply for Commercial Services:
Commercial Extra Service Fees
Commercial Cart Carry out charge if > 50 feet (per time)
$6.70
Additional Roll out fees over 25 feet,
from point of safe truck access/ pickup
$3.71
Unlocking & locking Gates and/or container lids, per pickup
$3.84
Return Trip for containers not available for collection at
regularly scheduled pickup time
$29.51
b. Any extra yardage charges determined by the collection
contractor due to overflowing containers will be charged per yard at the one (1)
yard rate listed under Subsection 8-1-10B.2.a.
5
ORDINANCE NO.
6. Special Services: Whenever special services not contained within
this schedule are required, the rate charged for those special services shall be
negotiated by the customer with the City and the collection contractor.
C. Commercial Roll Off Customers: Commercial Roll Off Customers are
those who have a ten (10) — forty (40) yards container or compactor. These large
disposal containers are lifted and weighed at the disposal facility. Commercial
container customers pay a disposal pickup fee based upon the number of
pickups, a weight based fee and a container rental fee. Compactor customers
pay a pickup fee based upon the number of pickups and a weight based disposal
fee.
1. Base Pick Up Fees: The base pick up fees are as follows on a per
occurrence basis:
Commercial Roll Off Rates are Per Pickup
10 Yards Container
$182.97
15 Yards Container
$196.39
20 Yards Container
$201.78
30 Yards Container
$218.76
40 Yards Container
$234.13
10 Yards Compactor
$208.23
20 Yards Compactor
$225.00
30 Yards Compactor
$241.82
40 Yards Compactor
$256.86
The minimum pickups are twice per month.
2. Rental Rates: The following are rental rates for roll off containers:
Monthly Rental Rates
10 Yards Container
$41.75
15 Yards Container
$59.59
20 Yards Container
$77.41
R
ORDINANCE NO.
30 Yards Container $95.26
40 Yards Container $117.39
3. Disposal Fees: In addition to the Base Charge per pick up and the
monthly rental fee, the customer must pay weight based disposal fees plus
applicable tax.
D. (Rep. by Ord. 4898, 3-19-2001)
E. Classification and Appeal: Service category classifications shall be on
the basis of the type and volume of solid waste and the purpose and type of the
dwelling or facility being served as determined by the Public Works
Administrator of the City, or the Administrator's duly authorized representative.
Any person who shall deem their classification improper may appeal to the Solid
Waste Coordinator within forty-five (45) days following their classification or
change of classification. After the decision of the Solid Waste Coordinator, if the
party appealing is still aggrieved, then the party may appeal to the Public Works
Administrator, whose decision shall be final.
SECTION II. These rates become effective with billings computed on or after January
1, 2010.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2010.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
7
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of .2009. 0
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1594:10/21/09:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
N.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.0�.3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 2
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES
ANNEXATION AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT.
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5489, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 18.2 acres, generally located immediately south of Northeast
12th Street, if extended, and immediately west of 148th Avenue SE, known as the Honey Creek
Estates annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant to law,
must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 2
before the qualified electors within the Honey Creek Estates annexation area in the February 9,
2010, ballot.
SECTION Ill. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 2 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
2. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE HONEY CREEK ESTATES ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
18.2-acres known as the Honey Creek Estates annexation area and would allow
the area to remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
❑ Yes
❑ No
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 2 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
9
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT
THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION, TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 2010, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 3
BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WITHIN THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
AREA ON THE FEBRUARY 9, 2010 BALLOT.
WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk a referendum petition
to remain a part of unincorporated area of King County; and
WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County
Department of Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid
signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2009, the King County Department of Elections certified that
the referendum petition bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5491, adopted by the Renton City Council on September 14,
2009, annexing approximately 15.9 acres, generally located immediately north of Southeast
Renton -Issaquah Road and immediately east of Jericho Avenue Northeast, if extended, known
as the Sunset East annexation area, was not repealed by the Renton City Council, and pursuant
to law, must be submitted to the voters of the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that
King County call a special municipal election on February 9, 2010, and place Proposition 3
before the qualified electors within the Sunset East annexation area in the February 9, 2010,
ballot.
SECTION Ill. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary
to place Proposition 3 before the area voters on the February 9, 2010, election.
SECTION IV. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition
3. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to the King County Department of
Elections:
CITY OF RENTON REFERENDUM MEASURE
CONCERNING THE SUNSET EAST ANNEXATION
This measure would revoke the City of Renton's annexation of approximately
15.9-acres known as the Sunset East annexation area and would allow the area to
remain a part of unincorporated King County.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
Yes
SECTION V. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take
those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 3 in the February 9,
2010, voter's pamphlet.
SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with
it are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. MS_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON GRANTING AUTHORITY
FOR AN INTERFUND LOAN TO FUND 422, RENTON GATEWAY CENTER UTILITIES,
FOR 750 WEST PERIMETER ROAD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, RCW 43.09.200 provides that the State Auditor shall formulate, prescribe,
and install a system of accounting and reporting for all local governments; and
WHEREAS, such a system has been created and is known as the Budgeting, Accounting
and Reporting System (BARS); and
WHEREAS, the BARS manual at Part 3, Chapter 4, Section A, provides guidelines for
loans between City funds; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3811 of the City of Renton Washington granted authority for
temporary loans between City funds; and
WHEREAS, Fund 422, Renton Gateway Center Utilities, is in need of a temporary loan of
four hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($475,000) from City Utilities in order to provide
pad -ready improvements for the leased area located at 750 West Perimeter Road (750 site).
The 750 site is the area that was recently leased to the Renton Gateway Center, LLC for the
construction of a hangar building;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
CTION II. An interfund loan of two hundred forty thousand dollars ($240,000) from
the Water Utility, Fund 405, and an interfund loan of two hundred thirty-five thousand dollars
($235,000) from the Surface Water Utility, Fund 407, for a total loan amount of four hundred
seventy-five thousand dollars ($475,000) are authorized for Fund 422 for utility improvements
to the 750 site. The life of the loan will be five (5) years, and the estimated interest will be fifty-
one thousand dollars ($51,000) over the five (5) year period of the loan. The annual loan
repayments from the Airport will be one hundred five thousand two hundred four dollars
($105,204).
SECTION III. This Resolution shall be effective upon its passage and approval.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2009.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2009.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1427:10/22/09:scr
2
Denis Law, Mayor