HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 02/03/2003AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
February 3, 2003
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Police Department Promotional Appointments
4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 27, 2003. Council concur. .
b. Mayor Tanner appoints Geraldine Jackson, 1730 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton, 98058, to the Planning
Commission to fill the unexpired term of Cheryl Danza, who has resigned (term to expire
1/31/2005). Refer to Community Service Committee.
c. Court Case filed by Jeffrey H. Tyler, 705 2nd Ave., Suite 1700, Seattle, 98104, representing Tara
L. Knecht, alleging that a malfunctioning traffic signal located at the intersection of Monroe Ave.
NE and NE 4th St. caused a traffic accident between Lewis B. Peters and Tara L. Knecht on
February 23, 2001. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
d. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Honey Creek Hill
Final Plat; 16 single-family lots on 2.69 acres located at NE Sunset Blvd. and Redmond Ave. NE
(FP-02-133). Council concur. (See 9. for resolution.)
e. Finance & Information Services Department will present a year-end review of the City's financial
status for 2002. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
f. Surface Water Utility Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $245,000
with R.W. Beck, Inc. to complete the Springbrook Creek Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) floodplain map update. Refer to Utilities Committee.
7. CORRESPONDENCE
8. OLD BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the chairman if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Naming of Veterans Memorial Park
b. Finance Committee: Deputy Fire Chief Position Salary; Puget Sound Energy Street Lighting
Back Bill; Claims Service 2003 Fee Schedule; Crime Analyst Hire at Step E
c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: SR-167 Springbrook Creek Culvert Replacement Project
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE).
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Resolution: Honey Creek Hill Final Plat (see 6.d.)
Ordinance for first reading:
Sanitary sewer system connection to properties outside City limits (Council approved on 1/27/2003)
10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
11. AUDIENCE COMMENT
12. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room, 7th Floor
6:30 p.m.
Emerging Issues: Retiree Health Benefit Update; Moratorium Update; and other General Issues
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
RENTON CITY COUNCII.
Regular Meeting
February 3, 2003 Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the
meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; DAN CLAWSON; TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; KING PARKER; TERRI
BRIERE.
CITY STAFF IN
JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE
RUSSELL WILSON, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City
Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; JUDGE
TERRY JURADO, Municipal Court; JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services
Administrator; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, DEPUTY CHIEF KEVIN
MILOSEVICH, COMMANDER KENT CURRY, SERGEANT CLARK
WILCOX, and COMMANDER KATHLEEN MCCLINCY, Police Department.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
Municipal Court Judge Terry Jurado administered. the oath of office to Clark
Police: Promotional
Wilcox, newly promoted Police Sergeant; to Kent Curry, newly promoted
Appointments
Police Commander; and to Kevin Milosevich, newly promoted Deputy Chief of
Police. Police Chief Garry Anderson reviewed the police officers'
qualifications, and presented each with a badge of the position.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT
report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted
included:
• The Renton Senior Activity Center will host a housing fair for senior
citizens on Thursday, February 13th, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
Representatives from Renton area senior housing projects will be available
to answer questions.
• The Neighborhood Grant Program has $50,000 available for matching grant
funds in 2003, and a workshop will be held on February 19th at Renton
City Hall for those interested in learning more about applying for a
neighborhood grant. Applications are due on Friday, March 14th.
The flow in the Green River reached 7,100 cubic feet per second (cfs) on
Friday, January 31st, resulting in a Stage II flood alert. This would not
impact Renton unless a levee should fail, which is unlikely. The 100-year
flood event on the Green River is 12,000 cfs. Renton is typically not
impacted until flows reach 10,500 cfs, then requiring reduction of the
pumping rate from Springbrook Creek in the Black River Pump Station.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Ingo Goller, 21851 84th Ave. S., Kent, 98032, spoke on behalf of the
Citizen Comment: Goller - SR- Washington State Department of Transportation regarding the closure of SR-
167 Springbrook Creek 167 for the replacement of the Springbrook Creek Culvert. He explained that
Culvert Replacement Project the purpose of the culvert replacement is to improve fish passage and flow
capacity under SR-167. Mr. Goller indicated that the issue was discussed by
the Transportation Committee at its meeting last Thursday, and based on that
February 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 48
discussion, he asked Council to consider limiting the closure of SR-167 to one
of the following weekends: July 18 — 20, July 24 — 26, August 8 — 10, or
August 15 — 17, 2003.
Emphasizing that a full closure of SR-167 during the last four weekends in
August will greatly impact area businesses, Chief Administrative Officer Jay
Covington noted the City's preference to close SR-167 the first weekend in
August.
Councilman Persson reported that the Transportation Committee will hold the
matter in Committee for further discussion.
Mayor Tanner indicated that although the City would rather avoid full closure
of SR-167 during July 25 — 27 (Renton River Days), or August 1— 3 (SeaFair
festival), closure on either of those weekends is preferred over a closure during
the last four weekends in August. He stressed that a highway closure later than
August 3rd must be avoided in order to minimize the negative financial impacts
on area businesses.
Councilwoman Nelson expressed her hope that the closure, weather permitting,
could take place the weekend of July 18 — 20. Mr. Goller acknowledged the
City's concerns, and welcomed further discussion of the matter.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 27, 2003. Council concur.
January 27, 2003
Appointment: Planning
Mayor Tanner appointed Geraldine Jackson, 1730 Pierce Ave. SE, Renton,
Commission
98058, to the Planning Commission to fill the unexpired term of Cheryl Danza,
who has resigned (term to expire 1/31/2005). Refer to Community Services
Committee.
Court Case: Tara L Knecht,
Court Case (Summons and Third -Party Complaint for Damages) filed by
CRT-03-002
Jeffrey H. Tyler, 705 2nd Ave., Suite 1700, Seattle, 98104, representing Tara L.
Knecht, alleging that a malfunctioning traffic signal located at the intersection
of Monroe Ave. NE and NE 4th St. caused a vehicular accident between Lewis
B. Peters and Tara L. Knecht on February 23, 2001. Refer to City Attorney and
Insurance Services.
Plat: Honey Creek Hill, NE
Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
Sunset Blvd, FP-02-133
Honey Creek Hill Final Plat; 16 single-family lots on 2.69 acres located at NE
Sunset Blvd. and Redmond Ave. NE (FP-02-133). Council concur. (See page
50 for resolution.)
Finance: 2002 Year -End
Finance and Information Services Department will present a year-end review of
Financial Status Review
the City's financial status for 2002. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
Utility: Springbrook Springs
Surface Water Utility Division recommended approval of a contract in the
FEMA Floodplain Map
amount of $245,000 with R.W. Beck, Inc. to complete the Springbrook Creek
Update, RW Beck
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain map update.
Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
February 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 49
OLD BUSINESS
Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report regarding the
Community Services
naming of Veterans Memorial Park. In August of 1998, the City Council
Committee
dedicated the property located at the corner of Main Ave. S. and S. 3rd St.
Community Services: Veterans
(formerly the Holms Building site, behind the Museum) for a veteran's
Memorial Park Naming
memorial. In accordance with City Policy 600-04, this recommendation was
reviewed and approved by the Park Board. The Park Board concurred with the
staff recommendation, and recommended approval of the name "Veterans
Memorial Park." The Community Services Committee recommended
concurrence in the recommendation of the staff and the Park Board. MOVED
BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services: Uptown In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the retention of the old
Glassworks Building Historic painted advertisements located on the Uptown Glassworks building at 230
Wall Signs Main. Ave. S. which borders Veterans Memorial Park, Chief Administrative
Officer Covington reported that although the City applied a preservative to the
advertisements at one time, it has since worn off. He noted that there is not
much the City can do since the building is privately owned. Mr. Clawson
stated that the advertisements are a community asset, and expressed his hope
that the building owner would preserve them.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the salary for the
Police: Crime Analyst Hire at Crime Analyst position. The Committee recommended concurrence in the
Step E recommendation of staff to approve the placement of the new employee in the
Crime Analyst position at Step E, Grade pn56. MOVED BY PARKER,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation: Puget Sound Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Puget Sound
Energy Street Lighting Back Energy (PSE) back bill. PSE affiliate, Into -Light, performed a company -wide
Bill audit to establish ownership of all streetlights. PSE discovered that many of the
streetlights in service have never been billed. The Washington Utilities and
Transportation Commission (WUTC) does not allow cross subsidization of
rates, therefore in accordance to Electric Tariff G, Schedule 54, PSE is allowed
to back bill customers up to a maximum of three years.
In Renton, the audit discovered 179 City- and PSE-owned streetlights that were
installed and never billed. PSE has back billed the City in the amount of
$42,682 based on the audit information, which has been verified by
Transportation Division staff. The Finance Committee recommended
concurrence in the recommendation of staff that Council authorize the
Administration to pay $42,682 using non -departmental funds. MOVED BY
PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Human Resources: 2003 Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the purchase of
Claims Processing Fee claims services for fiscal year 2003. The Committee recommended
Schedule (Medical, Dental & concurrence in the recommendation of staff to approve the 2003 fee schedule
Prescription) for medical, dental, and prescription claims processed by Healthcare
Management Administrators (HMA) and Pharmaceutical Card Services (PCS).
The City will continue to utilize the services of HMA and PCS to administer
medical, dental, and prescription claims within the City's self -funded plan. The
total cost of services will be approximately $27.07 per month, per employee.
The fee includes prescription services; administration of medical and dental
February 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 50
claims; preferred provider program rental as well as utilization/large case
management COBRA and HIPAA administration services. Funds for this
service are included in the approved 2003 Budget.
The Committee further recommended that the fee schedule be effective January
1, 2003. These changes will not require additional budget appropriations.
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Human Resources: Deputy Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the salary
Chief Position Salary Increase increase for the Deputy Fire Chief position. The Committee recommended
to Grade m45 concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the proposed modification
in the compensation for the management position of Deputy Fire Chief. The
proposal will move the two Deputy Fire Chiefs into the same salary grade as
Deputy Police Chief.
The new labor agreement with Local 864 resulted in salary increases for the
Fire Battalion. Chiefs, thereby creating a salary compression with the Deputy
Fire Chief position in that the difference in salary between the positions is
currently less that 4%. The compensation modification will also achieve
internal equity between the Deputy Chief positions in the Police and Fire
Departments.
The Committee recommended that effective January 1, 2003, the Fire Deputy
Chief position be placed at salary grade m45 with a monthly salary range of
$7,315 to $8,913; and current incumbents, Glen Gordon and Arthur Larson, be
placed at Step E ($8,913 per month). Funds of approximately $10,600 for the
salary increase are available in the current budget. MOVED BY PARKER,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
ORDINANCES AND
The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption:
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution #3619
A resolution was read approving the Honey Creek Hill Final Plat consisting of
Plat: Honey Creek Hill, NE
approximately 2.69 acres located in the vicinity of NE Sunset Blvd. and
Sunset Blvd, FP-02-133
Redmond Ave. NE (FP-02-133). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS
READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 02/10/2003 for second and final reading:
Utility: Sewer Service
An ordinance was read amending Section 4-6-040.C.1, of Chapter 6, Street and
Connection for Property
Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by
Outside City Limits
revising policies by which the City allows connection to its sanitary sewer
system by property owners outside of the current City limits. MOVED BY
CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE
FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 02/10/2003. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
Council: Meeting Cancellation CANCEL ITS REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2003, IN
(2/17/2003) OBSERVANCE OF PRESIDENTS' DAY. CARRIED.
February 3, 2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 51
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL
ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:10 p.m.
•.
BONNIE I, WAL'tON. City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
February 3, 2003
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 3, 2003
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COUNCIL RETREAT WED., 2/05 Emerging Issues
and (*Hilton Garden Inn
THURS., 2/06 1801 E. Valley Rd.*)
8:00a.m.-5:00p.m.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 2/10 2002 Year-end Financial Report;
(Keolker-Wheeler) 6:00 p.m. Property Tax Briefing
COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 2/10 Geraldine Jackson Appointment to
(Nelson) 3:45 p.m. Planning Commission
FINANCE MON., 2/10 Vouchers;
(Parker) 4:30 p.m. Transit Center Espresso Stand Contract
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MON., 2/10 Comprehensive Plan Update —
(Briere) 4:00 p.m. Employment Area Valley Policies
PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 2/10 Auto Theft Tools;
(Clawson) 5:30 p.m. Burglaries in the Renton Highlands
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Persson)
UTILITIES TUES., 2/04 Springbrook Creek FEMA Floodplain
(Gorman) 2:15 p.m. Map Update Contract with RW Beck
1
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
Police Chief Garry Anderson
Cordially invites you to attendga
'r
IN -
the official promotional
celebration for
DEPUTY CHIEF
KEVIN MILOSEVICH
COMMANDER
KENT CURRY
SERGEANT
CLARK WILCOX
Monday, February 3, 2003
Renton City Hall
Council Chambers
7th Floor - 7:30 PM
Reception following
Renton Police Department
2nd Floor - City Hall
Conference Room A
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 2003
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Jesse Tanner, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Exercise your right to vote! Phase III of the Renton School District's twenty-year school construction plan
goes before the voters, Tuesday, February 40'. Polling places located within the Renton City limits are posted
on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Renton Area Youth and Family Services (RAYS) is seeking three new board members. The goal of RAYS is
to ensure accessibility and availability of supportive human services to City of Renton low-income children,
adolescents, and parents. RAYS provides a full range of programs and services to meet basic needs for food,
clothing, shelter, and transportation. Anyone interested in serving on the board should contact David
Downing, RAYS Development Director, at 425-271-5600, for further information. Applicants must work or
live within Renton city limits.
On February 190' at 2:00 p.m. Carco Theatre presents family entertainer Tim Noah, who is nationally known
for his upbeat songs and costumes. Tickets are available at the Community Center or by calling the Carco
Theatre ticket line at 425-430-6707.
The Renton Senior Activity Center will host a Housing Fair for Senior Citizens on Thursday, February 130',
from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Representatives from Renton area senior housing projects will be available to
answer questions about retirement homes, adult family homes, low-income housing, senior mobile parks,
affordable housing, nursing homes, human services, and assisted living residences. For additional information,
please contact the Renton Senior Activity Center at 425-430-6633.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• The Neighborhood Grant Program has $50,000 available for matching grant funds in 2003 and recently
launched the first round of grant funding. The matching -grant projects can include physical improvement
and/or newsletter projects. A workshop will be held on February 19`h at Renton City Hall for those interested
in learning more about applying for a neighborhood grant. Applications are due on Friday, March 14t', at 5:00
p.m. For additional information, please contact Norma McQuiller, Neighborhood Coordinator, at 425-430-
6595.
Administrative Report
February 3, 2003
Page 2
FIRE DEPARTMENT
• Last week, Fire Marshal Larry Rude co-chaired a special Code Action Committee meeting, which was hosted
by the Washington State Association of Fire Marshals. Representatives included fire and building officials
from eight western states, as well as national industry leaders. The International Code Council not only
endorsed the meeting, they also provided technical assistance in support of this grass roots effort to provide
western regional involvement with ICC code development.
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
We received a clarification from Tukwila that the target date for opening South 180th St./SW 43rd to through
traffic is June 17ffi, which could be moved back into July if unforeseen problems should arise.
The flow in the Green River reached 7,100 cubic feet per second (cfs) on Friday, January 31", resulting in a
Stage H flood alert. This would not impact Renton unless a levee should fail, which is unlikely. The 100-year
flood event on the Green River is 12,000 cfs. Renton is typically not impacted until flows reach 10,500 cfs,
then requiring reduction of the pumping rate from Springbrook Creek in the Black River Pump Station.
The US Army Corps has notified the City that the Corps has been approved to receive funding to complete the
Cedar River Spawning Channel project design and permitting. Receipt of funding for construction will be
contingent upon the City certifying that we have obtained property rights (Seattle and Department of Natural
Resources) by March 256, and regulatory permits by April 2501.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
• During the week of February 4-10, the Police Department will be conducting traffic emphasis in the following
areas:
Date
Area
Emphasis
Tuesday, February 4
3800 block, NE 10`s St
Radar/Speed
Wednesday, February 5
2200 block, Talbot Road S
Speed/school
Thursday, February 6
3800 block, Talbot Road S
Radar/Speed
Friday, February 7
Maple Valley Highway
Speed
Monday, February 10
800 block, Union Ave NE
Speed/School
RECEIVED
r E-8 0 3 2003
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WOMMONIBMTOUNCL
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 2003 ClreOFTIMTON
TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President FEB 0 3 2003
Members of the Renton City Council CITY rI CE►VED
CLERK'S OFFICE
VIA: -�� Jesse Tanner, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman
STAFF CONTACT: Gregg Zimmerman (x-7311)
SUBJECT: SR 167 Culvert Project
The Administration's position regarding the timing of the weekend closure of SR 167 in order to
install the upper Springbrook Creek Culvert is that the financial interests of IKEA and the other
impacted businesses are of paramount importance. Scheduling of the full highway closure must
be done in a manner to minimize negative financial impacts on the businesses, which means that
highway closure during the last four weekends in August must be avoided.
Although it would be preferred to avoid full closure of the highway during the last weekend of
Renton River Days (July 29/30) or during the SeaFair weekend (Aug. 2/3), we would support
highway closure during either of these two weekends rather than during the succeeding four
weekends in August. We would support a proposal that would allow highway closure during one
of the weekends between July 12 and August 3, but we would oppose a proposal that would allow
highway closure later in August than August 3.
cc: [Click here and type name]
DocumenMcor
V
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.... AJLS Department
Staff Contact ......... Jesse Tanner, Mayor
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Planning Commission
Geraldine (Genie) Jackson
EXHIBITS:
Community Service Application
FOR AGENDA OF February 3, 2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ................. X
Public Hearing.....
Correspondence...
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business.........
New Business.......
Study Session........
Other .....................
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Refer to Community Services Committee Legal Dept............
Finance Dept........
Other .....................
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required..... Transfer/Amendment....
Amount Budgeted............ Revenue Generated.......
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Tanner appoints Geraldine Jackson to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired three-year term,
which expires on 01/31/2005, replacing Cheryl Danza who resigned.
IMs. Jackson's address is: 1730 Pierce Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98058; Phone: 425-277-0942.
The other members of the Planning Commission are: Natalie Dohrn, Eugene Ledbury, Ray Giometti, Rosemary
Quesenberry, Jerrilyn Hadley, and Eric Cameron.
RECOVER
JAN 2 3 2001
CITY OF RENTON MAYORSOFFICE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 10, 2003
TO: Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Actin&Ministrator "-e
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment
We completed 5 interviews for the Planning Commission position vacated by Cheryl Danza. The
position is an unexpired term running until 1/31/05.
Our recommendation is to appoint Geraldine (Genie) Jackson to this unexpired term. Genie is an
18-year resident who works as a real estate manager and project facilitator for King County
Metro on real estate investment. Her professional experience gives her useful background in
project management that will add to the Commission's perspective and deliberations. She has
worked on the Renton Metro facility permitting in the past and is known to some Renton staff in
this capacity. She does not have any professional conflicts with the Planning Commission's work
as 1) the Commission is not involved in permitting/current planning issues, and 2) Gerrie is now
assigned to projects outside of Renton. She is supportive of the City's Business Plan goals and as
a long term resident is aware of citizen opinions about growth related issues. Most important, she
is very positive about Renton.
We recommend that the applications of Marty A McCombs and James Dougherty be kept on file
for consideration if future vacancies occur. These individuals could be candidates in the future
depending upon the composition of the Commission at the time, and the issues before the City.
We also recommend that Jordan Lee Miller and Terry Perrson be encouraged to look for
volunteer opportunities elsewhere in the community/city as their background and expertise does
not match the needs of the Planning Commission at this time.
cc: Jay Covington
Rebecca Lind
HAMNSPTIanning ConunUppointmentsVackson appointment.do6cor
*Citvo
Renton Volunteer Application
Personal Information
Name: �E �, p, E.1���' Date: Ott al �sz�
Address: ! 3� �{ lFL�'tJ�� City/State/Zip:�h'�r
Home Phone a," -7 - Di,, g,-- Work Phone:-" L- i"�g - / 34 y� Social Security #:
Yes Q Do you have any special requirements or a health condition that the City of Renton should be
No A aware of while you are a volunteer?
If yes, please describe
In case of emergency, please notify:
Name: A F-�z L J A Relationship:_ �zy 5 773n 7)
Home Phone: I1 2.-6" �`7 `7 r b��/ '� Business Phone: ` d'' ��7
Physicians Name: (0 &S Phone: f a
In case of an emergency, can we release the above information to the emergency medical crew, clinic, or
hospital? Yes )d No ❑
Past experience I
Employment and/or Volunteer Experience: tk.' i g-L2
-t-.0 Ac - -P P v tP A La £, fit T % -7��e-r-1. i'T ('�t: P- -"
Education/Training: 6 Ps - _ _-E_"I�s
Special skills or hobbies:
VolunteerOpportunities
There are a variety of volunteer opportunities in the City of Renton. In order to provide maximum satisfaction,
individual volunteers will be carefully matched according to their choice, skills and available assignments.
Do you have a volunteer preference:: f ,, yv- M , s ; a,) Skills:
Time Available: Morning ❑ Afternoon ❑ Evening
Mon ❑ Tues ❑ Wed ❑ Thurs ❑ Fri ❑ Weekends ❑
References
List two references (other than family) whom the City can contact and their relationship to you (friend, employer, etc.)
Name: p.� P-A-z E�k� Phone: �` 3 ' ? 3 T"" Csc� Relationship: Lc>
Address: "7 i 11 5 AP pt4) R-E� 4 f 5 L rJ City/State/Zip: /-AkELJrr� r� L.2A of
Name: Ac_�f; ;j_ �.F,►.t S/ r-L- Phone: In c �voL,Relationship: ('c1�-TzD
Address: t `� �`/ `I Sc� i T'LE 2/0 City/State/Zip:
Background
The City of RentopIrVay request a background check from the Washington State Patrol.
Signature:
Sonja Mejlaender, Volunteer Program Coordinator, City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Work Phone: (425) 430-6514 Fax: (425) 430-6523 E-mail: smejlaender@ci.renton.wa.us
October 25, 2002
The Honorable Jesse Tanner
Mayor, City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Planning Commission Vacancy
Dear Mayor Tanner:
RECEIVED
MAYORSOFROE
By this letter I am respectfully requesting consideration of my application for the vacant
position on the City of Renton Planning Commission which is enclosed.
I have been a resident of Tiffany Park in the City of Renton for the past eighteen years
and have worked since 1983 for Metro and King County Metro Transit as a real property
agent and permit coordinator. I have a degree in Business Administration from the
University of Washington and have taken additional courses in real estate appraisal, land
use and real estate law. My past volunteer activities include being on the Board of
Directors for the Northwest Center for the Retarded.
My personal interests include travel, architecture and urban design. I am convinced that a
warm, harmonious environment that supports people can be created through thoughtful
planning.
Over the years I have worked with the City of Renton staff on various projects and am
familiar with the planning process and much of the city code and comp plan.
I look forward to involvement in my community and would be pleased to be considered
for the position on the Planning Commission.
Sinter ,
----�
Geraldi Gerrie) Jackson
1730 Pierce Avenue SE
Renton, Washington 98058
(425)277-0942
R4�
January 27, 2003
Ms. Geraldine Jackson
1730 Pierce Ave SE
Renton, WA 98058
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
Dear Ms. Jackson:
A
Mayor
Jesse Tanner
Mayor Tanner has submitted your name for appointment to the Planning Commission for
a three-year unexpired term, expiring January 31, 2005. The Community Services
Committee of the City Council will meet on March 3rd at 6:00 p.m. in the 71h floor
council conference room to consider the appointment. You are invited and encouraged to
attend this meeting. The Committee will then submit their report at the council meeting
that same evening at 7:30 p.m. at which time the City Council will consider confirmation
of your appointment. You are also invited to attend this meeting.
The Planning Commission meets at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers on the first and
third Wednesdays of the month, with additional meetings as required. You may contact
Rebecca Lind at 425-430-6588 or Judy Wright at 425-430-6575 for more information.
Sincerely,
Margaret Pullar
Executive Secretary to the Mayor
cc: Jay Covington
Alex Pietsch
Rebecca Lind
Judy Wright
Julia Medzegian
Bonnie Walton
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523
This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
CRT-03-002; Court Case — Lewis B. Peters (Plaintiff) vs. Tara
L. Knecht and John Doe Knecht (Defendant & Third -Party
Plaintiff) vs. City of Renton (Third Party Defendant)
EXHIBITS:
Summons and Complaint
Al11 #:
6-C .
11
ENDA OF: 02/03/2003
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent ......... XX
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance.. .
Resolution.. .
Old Business.......
New Business......
Study Session....
Other....
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted ........ Revenue Generated...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Summons and Complaint filed in King County Superior Court by Jeffrey H. Tyler, Law Offices of Nelson
Tyler Langer, 705 2nd Ave., Suite 1700, Seattle, 98104, representing Tara L. Knecht (third -party plaintiff),
alleging that a malfunctioning traffic signal located at the intersection of Monroe Ave. NE and NE 4th St.
caused a traffic accident between Lewis B. Peters and Tara L. Knecht on February 23, 2001.
agendabl.doc/c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
.3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
L
In King County 5uPutior Court ClocKs �iti
J AN u 3 Z003
Gsshler Sect la01
t rKer
IMI
LEWIS B. PETERS,
Plaintiff,
Hon. Ronald Kessler
CITY OF RENTON
3:3yP.1,.
JAN 2 7 2003
RECEIVED.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
UPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
VS.
TARA L. KNECHT and JOHN DOE
KNECHT,
Defendant and
Third -Party Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation,
Third -Party Defendant.
NO. 02-2-26821-8KNT
SUMMONS (20 DAYS)
Cu. (Y1a�laaTavl��r
Pow/e/Pw
TO THE THIRD -PARTY DEFENDANTS: A lawsuit has been started against you in
the above -entitled court by TARA L. KNECHT, Third -Party Plaintiff. Third -Party Plaintiffs
claim is stated in the written complaint, a copy of which is served upon you with this summons.
In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the complaint by stating
your defense in writing, serve a copy upon the person signing this summons within 20 days
after the service of this summons, excluding the day of service, and file a copy with the court
named above. If you do not, a default judgment may be entered against you without prior
SUMMONS —Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF
NELSON TYLER LANGER
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1700
Seattle, Washington 98104
P)f 206/623-7520
1
2I
3
41
51,
61
7
81
9
10
11
12
.3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
notice. A default judgment is one where Third -Party Plaintiff is entitled to what she asks for
because you have not responded. If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned
person, you are entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered. A copy of all
responsive pleadings must be filed with the court.
If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly
so that your written response, if any, may be served and filed with the court on time.
This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Civil Rules of the Superior Court for
the State of Washington.
DATED this Day of January, 2003.
NELSON TYLER LANGER
SUMMONS —Page 2
7-5529
for Tara Knecht
LAW OFFICES OF
NELSON TYLER LANGER
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1700
Seattle, Washington 98104
206/623-7520
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8'
.9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Hon. Ronald Kessler I
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
LEWIS B. PETERS,
Plaintiff,
VS.
TARA L. KNECHT,
Defendant and
Third -Party Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation,
Third -Party Defendant.
NO. 02-2-26821-8KNT
DEFENDANT AND THIRD -PARTY
PLAINTIFF TARA KNECHT'S THIRD -
PARTY COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND INDEMNITY AGAINST THIRD -
PARTY DEFENDANT CITY OF RENTON
Defendant/third-party plaintiff TARA KNECHT alleges, as a third -party complaint for
damages and indemnity, against third -party defendant CITY OF RENTON, as follows:
1. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.1 Third -party plaintiff TARA KNECHT is a defendant in the above -captioned action over
which this Court has jurisdiction.
1.2 CITY OF RENTON, is a municipality chartered within the State of Washington.
1.3 On June 18, 2002 third -party plaintiff TARA KNECHT filed a notice of claim meeting
DEFENDANT AND THIRD -PARTY LAw OFFICES OF
NGER
PLAINTIFF TARA KNECHT'S THIRD- `1 NELSON T LER Suite
1700
PARTY COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — 0 �VeSeconwdme3nue , Suite 04attleashington98104Page 1 u 206/62-7520
1
2
1.4
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
the requirements of RCW 4.96 with the Clerk of the CITY OF RENTON.
Plaintiff LEWIS PETERS commenced the above -captioned action against defendant on
October 1, 2002.
11 1.5 Defendant TARA KNECHT answered plaintiff s complaint on October 30, 2002.
11 1.6 Following defendant TARA KNECHT's Answer, defendant TARA KNECHT brought
a counterclaim by separate pleading against plaintiff LEWIS.PETERS.
II. FACTS
11 2.1 On or about February 23, 2001 at approximately 7:30 am third -party plaintiff, Tara
1 2.2
1 2.3
1 2.4
Knecht, was driving her vehicle northbound on Monroe Avenue, Renton, King County,
Washington.
On or about February 23, 2001 plaintiff Lewis Peters was driving his vehicle eastbound
on NE 41h Street in Renton, King County, Washington.
As third -party plaintiff Knecht and plaintiff Peters approached the intersection, the
traffic signal was malfunctioning, changing from red to green indiscriminately; or
pleading in the alternative, the traffic signal was malfunctioning by staying indefinitely
in the red position for traffic in the position of third -party plaintiff Knecht.
Third -party plaintiff Knecht stopped her vehicle and then drove through the
intersection; treating the malfunctioning traffic signal as a four-way stop.
2.5 Plaintiff Peters ignored the fact that all the other traffic on the road was treating the
intersection of Monroe and 4`h Street in Renton as a four-way stop. Plaintiff Peters did
not treat the malfunctioning signal as a four-way stop.
2.6 Plaintiff Peters did not stop before proceeding into the intersection.
1 2.7 Third -party plaintiff Knecht's vehicle was hit on her passenger door by plaintiff Peters'
DEFENDANT AND THIRD -PARTY
LAw OFFICES OF
PLAINTIFF TARA KNECHT'S THIRD-
NELSON TYLER LANGER
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1700
PARTY COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES —
Seattle, Washington 98104
Page 2
206/623-7520
1 vehicle.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2.8 Plaintiff Peters badly injured third -party plaintiff Knecht when he slammed into her
vehicle.
2.9 Third -party defendant, City of Renton, had a duty to keep the traffic signal in question
in proper working order.
2.10 Third -party defendant, City of Renton, knew that the traffic signal was malfunctioning,
but did not take appropriate action to repair this hazardous condition.
2.11 Plaintiff Peters and third -party defendant, City of Renton, should be held financially
accountable for all of third -party plaintiff Knecht's medical bills, disability, suffering,
fear, lost wages and vehicle repair costs.
III. INJURIES
3.1 As a result of the accident above described, third -party plaintiff Knecht sustained
serious injuries.
IV. NEGLIGENCE
4.1 The above -described accident and injuries were proximately caused by the negligence
of plaintiff Peters and third -party defendant, City of Renton.
V. DAMAGES
5.1 Items of damages suffered by third -party plaintiff Knecht are:
(a) General damages, including past and future mental and physical pain and
suffering, loss of the ability to enjoy life, disability, and disfigurement.
(b) Medical costs and expenses, both past and future.
(c) Loss of earnings and impairment of earning capacity.
(d) Property damage and vehicle rental.
DEFENDANT AND THIRD -PARTY LAw OFFICES OF
PLAINTIFF TARA KNECHT'S THIRD- NELSON TYLER LANGER
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1700
PARTY COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — Seattle, Washington 98104
Page 3 206/623-7520
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
(e) Other special and general damages permitted by law that will be proved at trial.
The aforesaid damages are in amounts which will be proved at the time of trial.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, third -party plaintiff Knecht claims against third -party defendant City of
Renton for judgment against the plaintiff and third -party defendant jointly and severally for
general and special damages in amounts to be proved at trial, together with third -party plaintiff
Knecht's costs and disbursements herein incurred along with pre judgment interest, and for
such other relief as the Court may deem just and equitable.
DATED this - day of January, 2003.
DEFENDANT AND THIRD -PARTY
PLAINTIFF TARA KNECHT'S THIRD -
PARTY COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES —
Page 4
NELSON TYLER LANGER
fre yler
S A �25529
Attorney for Tara Knecht
LAW OFFICES OF
NELSON TYLER LANGER
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1700
Seattle, Washington 98104
206/623-7520
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #:
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of: February 3, 2003
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Arneta Henninger X7298
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
HONEY CREEK HILL FINAL PLAT
Correspondence..
(aka Woodbrier)
Ordinance .............
File NO.: LUA 02-133FP (Preliminary Plat LUA 01-
Resolution ............ X
024)
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
1. Resolution and legal description
Study Sessions......
2. Staff report and Recommendation dated January 23,
Information.........
2003
Recommended Action:
Council concur with staff recommendation and adopt
the resolution.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required...
Amount Budgeted.......
Total Proiect Budget
N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Approvals:
Legal Dept ......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Transfer/Amendment...... .
Revenue Generated.........
Share Total Proiect..
The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action.
This final plat subdivides 2.69 acres into 16 single family residential lots with water, sanitary
sewer, storm drainage, street lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements.
Design and construction of utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved, accepted or
deferred (and a security device posted) as required through the Board of Public Works prior to
recording the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the City of Renton will be
met prior to recording the plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Honey Creek Hill Final Plat, LUA 02-133FP, with the following conditions and
adopt the resolution.
1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording the plat.
2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff
prior to recording the plat.
I: \Projects\HONEYCREEKHILLAGNB.doc/
CITY OF RENTON, WASIRNGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (HONEY CREEK HILL; FILE NO. LUA-02-
133FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The property, consisting of approximately 2.69 acres, is located in the vicinity of
NE Sunset Blvd. and Redmond Avenue NE)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated January 23`d, 2003.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.965:1/28/03
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2003.
2003.
2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.,
THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 470 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTER
LINE OF THE RELOCATED SKAGIT—DIABLO—SEATTLE TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT —OF— WA Y,'
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 470 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THA T PORTION THEREOF LYING NOR THERL Y OF THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2, AS CONVEYED TO
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING
NO. 7112210128
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
EXHIBIT A
WOODBRIER
BY.,DATE.'
JOB NO.
�c� 4030 Lake Washington
PETE `'ON Blvd. N.E., suite 200112310J
FCHKD.
STHI-0001
C ONSULTING Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 827-5874Fax
SCALE.'Tel
(425) 822-7216JAS
N. T.S.
SE 101ST ST
NE 24 TH ST
NORTH
HIGHLANDS
PARK
NE 19TH ST
NE 177x1 PL SITE
2
o
a NE
NE 12th StSUNSETCOURPARK
%SE
o
116TH ST m
NE 10TH ST
�
NE9TH7KIWANIS
ZTH
ST
NE 7TH ST
VICINITY MAP
WOODBRIER
OWN. BY.
DATE.•
JOB NO.
4030 Lake Washington
PETERSON Blvd. N.E., Suite 200
RSG
1123103
STHI-0001
CIONSULTING Kirkland, WA.98033
Tel (425) 827-5874
CHKD. BY:
SCALE.
Fax (425) 822-7216
JAS
N. T. S.
z
o
z°
� 111
A I
'fl
I
C
Z
m
sa �
x
Z
TRACT
A
MS1 SO. FT.
1
o
ti
t
OA 1S' PUBM STORY
DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
C,CAN NO.
SM 210'
STORM
PVKXINAGE STORM
B
DR
O DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
O25' PRVATE
--
ACESSS AND
I7TRltt ESLT
DO18' PRIVATE
1
ACFSSS AND
U1IIJIY ESMT
1
O?e' PRIVATE
ACESSS AND
UTILJtt ESMT
1y1
V1--�
E4
TR �
1511
NF S(J
NS�T eC
>-1 kD
0 3, 60
1 1 1
T
SCALE IN FEE
Ull
23 WOODBRIER
FINAL PLAT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT: Jennifer Steig P.E.
Peterson Consulting Engineers
Honey Creek Hill Final Plat
(Preliminary Plat LUA 01-024PP)
File: LUA 02-133FP
LOCATION: NE Sunset Blvd and Redmond Ave NE
Section 4, Twp. 23 N. Rng. 5 E.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 16 single family residential lots
with water, sewer, storm, streets and lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
The applicant, Peterson Consulting Engineers, filed a request for approval of a 16 lot Final Plat.
2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a
Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated on March 27, 2001, for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located at NE Sunset Blvd and Redmond Ave NE. The new plat is located in
Section 4, Twp. 23 N. Rng. 5 E.
6. The subject site is a 2.69 acre parcel.
7. The Preliminary Plat received City of Renton Council approval on July 23, 2001.
8. The site has a R-10 (Single Family) land use zoning, with the adoption of Ordinance 4404
enacted in June 1993.
9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental
review and plat review. The applicant has complied with the conditions imposed by the ERC:
1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer, as found in
their report, "Geotechnical Engineering Report Honey Creek Hills, " by Nelson Geotechnical
Associates, Inc., dated January 29, 2001.
The applicant states that the construction plans have been designed and construction
has been completed in accordance with the geotechnical report prepared by Geotech
Consultants, Inc.
2. Staff recommends that the applicant follow the recommendations of the preliminary drainage
report, "Honey Creek Hill Preliminary Technical Information Report, " by Peterson
Consulting Engineers, dated February 20, 2001, as a mitigation measure.
The applicant states that the recommendations of the preliminary drainage report have
been followed.
3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00
per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.57 average
weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be due prior to
the recording of the plat.
The applicant states that the Traffic Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording,
of the plat.
4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each
new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee would be due prior to
the recording of the plat.
The applicant states that the Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of
the plat.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each
new single family residential lot. The fee would be due prior to the recording of the plat.
The applicant states that the Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of
the plat.
6. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat advising potential purchasers of lots and/or
homes that a higher than normal risk may be incurred due to the proximity of an underground
gas transmission pipeline. The language of the note shall be approved by the City of Renton
Attorney prior to recording the plat.
The applicant states that a note has been placed on the face of the plat advising potential
purchasers of lots and/or homes that a higher than normal risk may be incurred due to
the proximity of an underground gas transmission pipeline. The language of the note
shall be approved by the City of Renton Attorney prior to recording the plat.
HONEYCREEKHILLFP.DOC/
11. In addition, the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Preliminary
Plat:
1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the
Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee
Threshold Determination.
Applicant complied with the above noted ERC conditions.
2) A maintenance agreement shall be drafted and recorded, or a Homeowners' Association
established for the maintenance of all common stormwater and access improvements.
The applicant states that a Homeowner's Association is being created for
maintenance of all common stormwater and access improvements. The document
has been sent to the City Attorney for review.
3) A waiver shall be obtained so that the applicant may construct, on Road A', a temporary
cul-de-sac on the proposed project site or a temporary cul-de-sac on the abutting property
in an easement, or a hammerhead turnaround.
The applicant states that an approved hammerhead is provided at the intersection of
Redmond Ave NE and NE 14th St (cul-de-sac).
4) The applicant shall provide a turnaround acceptable to the Fire Department. The
turnaround can be abandoned or dismantled once adequate through or looped circulation
is provided by development of adjacent properties.
The applicant states that an approved hammerhead is provided at the intersection of
Redmond Ave NE and NE 14th St which is acceptable to the fire department.
S) Since through roads are anticipated from the new access road, signs should be posted that
prominently note that the stubs or cul-de-sac will eventually create a roadway or
roadways with through traffic.
The applicant states that signs will be posted stating road will have through traffic
with future development.
6) The plat map shall show in prominent typeface the location of the two "Olympic"
pipelines. Exhibit 47 [of the report to the Hearing Examiner] has the terms "Tract A" and
the font shall match or be larger than that used to write "Tract A. "
The applicant states that the `Olympic Pipeline' callout text on the final plat map is
as large as the `Tract A' text.
7) Since the subject site is located in an Aquifer Protection area, this office will suggest that
recharge be considered by staff if practical.
The applicant's engineer states that recharge is not practical for this project.
HONEYCREEKHILLFP.DOC/
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and
therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
1) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior
to the recording of the plat.
2) All fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
SUBMITTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
HONEYCREEKHILLFP.DOC/
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DEPT.:
Finance and Information Services Department
SUBJECT:
nd of the Year Review
EXHIBITS:
and copy of PowerPoint presentation and background materials
(to be provided the week of February 3, 2003.)
FOR AGENDA OF: Februa
AGENDA STATUS:
onsent ............................. X
?ublic Hearing ..................
orrespondence.................
Ord i n an ce..........................
Zesolution .........................
3Id Business .....................
Vew Business ....................
xecutive Session .............
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVALS:
Legal Dept ........................
efer to the Committee of the Whole.
Finance .............................. X
(IOther:
Executive ................ X
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Each year we do a presentation of the financial status on the prior year. A presentation of the 2002
financial status will be conducted for TV. The presentation will be comprised of a PowerPoint show and
background materials. This is for information only.
YEAR END
FINANCIAL STATUS
THE BIG PICTURE
WE ENDED 2002
"HOLDING OUR OWN."
• Total expenditures were 3.9% above last year.
• This included all expenditures — including transfers for the
capital funds and the expenditure of those funds.
• Revenues are on the next page.
1
WHAT IS DOWN?
REVENUES
—Purchase of electricity on the "spot" market. Cost to the City -
$800,000 in 2002 in electric utility rate revenue. This will continue
unless State Legislation fixes it.
—Gambling taxes are down $300,000. Issue: Is Native American
efforts harming local businesses? Or is it the economy?
—Sales taxes $300,000 less than last year. We will make some of
this up with the new businesses, but where is the economy going?
—Property tax — up a bit in 2002, but we do expect a flat base AV in
the next couple of years (like the early 1990's) due to building
revaluations.
—Golf course — did surprisingly well, after a very weak beginning.
— All utilities held up well.
WHAT IS UP?
• Health care costs — of course, this was
a given.
• Everything else was at or below budget
— as expected
2
ALL FUNDS
OVERVIEW
2002 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
WERE 17% LOWER THAN BUDGET —
primarily in the capital funds
$180,000,000
$120,000,000
$60,000,000
■ Revenues
■ Expenditures
$0
97 98 99 100 101 '02 ACT 02
BDGT
3
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
BY FUND TYPE ARE IMPORTANT BECAUSE
MANY FUND TYPES CANNOT BE MIXED
$160,000,000 ❑ Internal Service
® Enterprise
$140,000,000 ■ Capital
$120,000,000 ® Debt Service
® Special
$100,000,000 ® General Gvt
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$0
Revenues Expenditures
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
J
J
f /
rd
WE USED LESS FUND BALANCE THAN
ORIGINALLY ESTIMATED.
$70,000,000
$68,000,000
$66,000,000
$64,000,000
$62,000,000
$60,000,000 EM) Use of FB
$58,000,000 ® Expenditures
$56,000,000 Ir -+ Revenue
Budget Actual
THE SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR BASIC
SERVICES
2001 AND 2002
$18,000,000
$15,000,000
$12,000,000 ® 2001
■ 2002
$9,000,000
$6,000,000
$3,000,000
$0
Sales Property Utility Bldg/Plan AIIOther
fees
PROPERTY TAXES .60% HIGHER
THAN 2002 BUDGET
$20,000,000
$16,000,000 ®Actual
■ Budget
$12,000,000
$8,000,000
$4,000,000
$0 --lit
'97 '98 199 100 101 '02
roi
SALES TAX RECEIPTS 2.0% BELOW
2001 - AND 3.3% LOWER THAN
BUDGET
ANNUAL COLLECTIONS
$15, 500, 000
$15, 000, 000
$14, 500, 000
$14,000,000 ® Actual
M Bud et
$13, 500, 000
$13, 000, 000
199 100 101 '02
AUTO SALES - THE ONLY SALES
TAX SOURCE HIGHER THAN 2001
All Other mimmin
Bldg ■'02
®'01
General Retail
Auto Sales
0 0 0 0
6s o0 0 00 00 000 00
000 000 000 000 000 000
6g • 6y�'` bv�• 69p` bs,�• 6g�`
HOW MUCH DOES DIFFERENT KINDS OF
BUSINESSES GENERATE IN SALES TAXES?
1p IV,VVV,VVV
$12,000,000
$8,000,000
$4,000,000
$0
99
100
101
'02
0All Other
$4,849,600
$4,916,643
$5,038,741
$4,988,122
S Bldg
$1,545,886
$1,671,621
$2,060,060
$1,899,055
® General Retail
$3,887,252
$4,500,200
$4,876,830
$4,600,384
0 Auto Sales
$3,446,262
$3,775,582
$3,367,800
$3,549,973
HISTORICALLY WE HAVE LOST SALES
TAXES FROM MANUFACTURING
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000-
$600,000-
$400,000-
$200,000-
$0-ff
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 '00 '01 '02
WILL WE HAVE AN ISSUE WITH OUR
BASE AGAIN — FROM WAREHOUSING
ACTIVITIES?
• This is something we should brief either
at an informal Council Committee of the
Whole meeting or a Finance Committee
meeting about.
• It had no impacts on 2002.
ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX RECEIPTS
ARE $800,000 LOWER THAN BUDGET
$5,000,000
$4,000,000 ® ACTUAL
■ BD
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
97 98 99 '00 '01 '02
I
OTHER UTILITY TAXES ARE
HIGHER
THAN 2001
$6,000,000
$5,000,000 ENatural
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
97 98
99 100 101
02 ACT 02 BDGT
UTILITY RECEIPTS OVER AND SHORT
OF OUR 2002 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
$400, 000
Phone
$200,000
City
Cell
$0
-$200,000
Total Over Bdgt = $405,370
-$400,000
Total Under Bdgt =-$800,800
-$600,000
Total Difference =-$395,500
-$800,000
Electric
-$1,000,000
City
Electric Natural Gas Cell Phone
OverlUnderEst
($271)
1 ($800,626)
1 $142,570
1 $62,155
1 $200,646
10
BUILDING RELATED HIGHER THAN
2001 AND HIGHER THAN BUDGET
$3,000,000
[i Plan Check
$2,500,000 ■ Bldg
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
97 98 99 100 101 02 ACT 02
BDGT
ASSUMPTION: LAST YEAR FOR
STATE SHARED REVENUE
$1,000,000
® Criminal Justice funds
■ Formerly MVET/State
$750,000 Shared
$500,000
$250, 000
$0
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 '00 '01 '02
11
OTHER STATE SHARED REVENUE
RECEIPTS MEET EXPECTATIONS
$1,600,000
$1,200,000
$800,000 ® Gas Taxes
® Liquor Taxes
$400, 000
$0
97 98 99 100 101 02 ACT 02
BDGT
ANNUAL GAMBLING TAX RECEIPTS
BEGIN TO SHOW WEAKNESS
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
Bingo
$500,000 Pull Tabs
■Cards
$0
98 99 100 101 '02
12
PARK FEES GREW BY 8.2%
Primarily in the Self -Sustaining Area
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000 11 Boat Fees
$400,000 o Concessions
entals
$200,000 ®R
® Self Sustaining
$0
'97 '98 199 100 101 '02
INVESTMENT INTEREST
No improvement predicted in the near future
$7,000,000
0 Fiduciary Fund
$6,000,000 0 Proprietary Funds
® Capital Funds
$5,000,000 ® General Gov't
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 BDGT
13
IT ALL ADDS UP!!!
• "Interesting" Highlights
— Probation Assessment - $165,000 generated.
— Already charging for jail services $17,000.
— Electronic Home Detention - $162,000
— False Alarm Fees - $23,000
— Library Fines! - $34,589!
— Photocopies at Library - $8,300!
GENERAL GG FUND BALANCE
TABLE
Will be brought to meeting. We are double
checking numbers and working on carry
forwards. We also have to keep in mind the
relationship with 2003 budget. We balanced the
2003 budget using $1.4 million. We do have
that. We will have a fair fund balance.
14
MISCELLANEOUS
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AT YEAR END BOEING EMPLOYMENT DOWN BY 12.3%; AND OTHER
EMPLOYMENT DOWN 3.3%; REVENUE IS 7.3% LOWER.
ON 1/30/03 BOEING REPORTED AN 18% DECREASE IN
EMPLOYMENT 13,731. THE LOWEST EVER RECORDED BY US.
$3,000,000 - -- ----
48,000
$2,500,000
40,000
cn
$2,000,000 --32,000
0
E
ul<
$1,500,000
24,000
$1,000,000
16,000
E
5wq Employment Other
z
$500,000 a Boeing
8,000
Revenue
-
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 w )o 102 '1130103
0
15
OUR VOTED
DEBT BURDEN
CONTINUES
TO DECREASE
$40--------
----------------
$1,600,000
$35
$1,400,000
® Annual Debt Service
$30
♦—Rate per$1000AV
$1,200,000
$25
$1,000,000
$20
$800,000
$15
$600,000
$10
$400,000
$5
$200,000
$0
$0
97 98 99
100 101 '02 '03 '04 '05
LODGING TAX RECEIPTS CONTINUE
TO BE $150,000 IN THIS ECONOMY
$300,000 ® Collections
$250,000 ■ Exps
N Ending Fund Balances
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
1999 2000 2001 2002
16
CAPITAL FUNDS
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
RECORD NUMBER OF HOMES SOLD;
RENTON MEDIAN HOME PRICE INCREASES
BY 7.3%
1200------- — $220,000 —T $225,000
1,196
0 0 Homes Sold
N 800 $150,000
� U
E d
0
x c
o co
aD
400 $75,000 2
0
Z _ Number of Homes Sold
Median Price
0 $0
97 98 99 00 O1 '02
17
OVERALL
HOME PRICES
CONTINUE TO GROW
■ $400K +
1400 0 $300 - $399K
❑ $200-$299K
1200
95 470
■ $100 - $199K
homes homes
®0-$99K
y
1000
6.
800
600
400
1.
200
0
97
98 99 100 101 '02
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXES
HIGHER THAN BUDGET
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1 ,500,000
$1 ,000,000
$500,000
$0
ANNUAL COLLECTIONS
E Collections
® Budget
'97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02
HIGHER DEVELOPMENT
LEADS
TO SOLID
MITIGATION REVENUE
$3,000,000
El Transportation
$2,500,000
® Fire
® Parks
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
3 Y.
1,000,000 'j
$500,000
$0
97
98 99 00
101 '02
LEASE PAYMENTS MEET THE OPERATIONAL
COSTS OF THE MILL AVENUE BUILDING
1/1/02 Fund Balance
1/1/02 Fund Balance
$265,672
REVENUES
Lease Payments
$485,640
Loan from 316
300,000
Loan from 316
300,000
TTL REVENUES
$1,085,640
EXPENDITURES
Operational
$129,111
Loan Payment
315,200
Tenant Imprvs
796,181
TTL EXPS
$1240,492
12/31/02 End FB
$110,820
19
THE GARAGE
t�
IS NEARLY COMPLETED
111102 Fund Balance
$9,478,118
REVENUES
Interest Earnings
$127,629
TTL REVENUES
127,629
EXPENDITURES
CIP Admin
$63,252
Construction
5,524,985
TTL EXPS
$5,588,238
12/31/02 End FB
This Amount will be in the
Carry Forward Ordinance
$4,017,509
DESIGN BEGINS FOR THE NEW POOL
1/1/02 Fund Balance
$-0-
REVENUES
Transfers from
Various Fund
Balances
$5,000,000
Interest Earnings
29,774
TTL REVENUES
$5,029,775
EXPENDITURES
Design
$100,452
TTL EXPS
I
alQQ 452
12/31/02 End FB
This Amount will be in the
Carry Forward Ordinance
$4,929,323
20
WE BROKE GROUND FOR THE NEW
FIRE STATION 12
1/1/02 Fund Balance
$988,700
REVENUES
Mitigation Fees
$518665
Interest Earnings
27,500
Loan from 316
3,879,040
TTL REVENUES
$4,425,205
EXPENDITURES
Operational
$57,655
Debt Payment
73,490
Construction
563,175
TTL EXPS
694 320
12/31/02 End FB This Amount will be in the $4,719,585
Carry Forward Ordinance
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
• Water
• Solid Waste
• Golf
• Airport
• And, their capital expenditures
21
WATER OPERATIONS ACTUAL
REVENUE
MET BUDGET
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
❑ All Other
0 Metro
$15,000,0000�—E]Surface
$10,000,000
®Sewer
■ Water
$5,000,000
$0
Budget
Actual
WATER OPERATING FUND BALANCES
INCREASE BY 13.4%
(Funds 401 and 451)
2002
Beginning FB
$6,128,128
Revenues
$25,329,659
Expenditures
$24,909,232
Ending FB
$6,548,555
22
WATER UTILITY CAPITAL SPENDING
WAS QUITE A BIT LOWER THAN
BUDGET
PROBABLY NEED TO CHANGE THIS INTO SOMETHING
$12,0b;90 ❑ Other
9s xRo Surface Water
g' � ® Sewer
® Water
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$0
Budget Actual
WHEN SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS
ARE DOWN - SO ARE THE REVENUES
AND THE COSTS
$10,000,000
$7,500,000
$5,000,000
® Budget
--Il
$2,500,000 ! Actual
$0
Rate Revenue Contractor and Tax Payments
23
THE SOLID WASTE FUND
BALANCE IS GROWING AGAIN
$10,000,000 --- — $1,000,000
$7,500,000 $750,000
$5,000,000 $500,000
$2,500,000 ® Revenues $250,000
® Expenditures
--l—Fund Balance
$0 $0
1999 2000 2001 2002
GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT
LOWERED EXPENDITURES TO MEET
A CHANGED ECONOMY
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
■ Rev
$500,000 ■ Exps
$0
'01 02 ACT 02 BDGT
24
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
One bright spot
THE FUND CONTINUES TO OPERATE
AT OR BELOW BUDGET —AS
EXPECTED.
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000 11 Revenues
■ Expenditures
$0
Revenues Expenditures
25
INSURANCE FUND
TO UNDERSTAND THE INSURANCE
FUND -
ONE HAS TO REVIEW IT BY LINES OF
BUSINESSES
• We capture the costs of all types of insurances in the
Insurance Fund.
— Property and liability
— Health
— Dental
— Industrial Insurance
— Unemployment
• The details are very important. This will be provided.
26
2003 CHALLENGES
BASED UPON 2002 ACTUALS
• PROPERTY TAX - We need to understand the implications on the
future.
• SALES TAX - Cost conscious retailers are doing well. The other parts
of the economy - not so well. If car sales drop, we will have an issue.
- Warehousing needs a special time to discuss.
• UTILITY TAX - Long term issue of Market Electric Purchases. Great
for us when a Texas company is manipulating the market. Terrible -
when large users figure out a way to minimize that cost.
• HEALTH COSTS - The Union contract changes will help! However,
there are some very serious national structural problems with the entire
system. These will be discussed again and again.
SUMMARY
• Our largest asset is economic development and the fact we
have new low cost retailers joining our tax base.
• However, "out of the gate" we have a $800,000 electric utility tax
receipts issue. And, the gambling tax revenue is a state wide
issue. Both of these are in Olympia and being worked on ....
The first compares city needs and those of a large company
with national stresses (airplane building). The second has all
kinds of communities of interest.
• Departments have been told to slow spending. We have
received the November collections in Sales taxes. They are
better than November 2001 numbers. We have not analyzed
the differences yet.
• The operative words — while a cliche — are correct.
SLOW AND STEADY
Cut out the "extras." Watch spending.
Don't see a lot of adds right now, but we are still okay.
(as of 1/30/03)
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
TOTALREVENUES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2002
$0 $3,000,000 $6.000,000 $9,000,000 $12,000,000 $15,000,000 $18,000,000 $21,000,000
Property Taxes 11101
Sales Taxes
Sales Taxes/Crim Justice
Utiiitity Taxes
Other Taxes
Licenses & Permits
Grants
Intergovt Revenues
Charges for Services +
I
:Fines & Forfeits
Narcotics Seizure. I
® 2002 BGT
Investment Interest. `
® 2002 YTD.
Miscellaneous
Interfund Revenues
Other. Financing Sources
Actual
Adjusted
Actual
Adjusted
DESCRIPTION
2002.YTD
2002 BGT
% BGT
2001 YTD
2001 BGT
% BGT
Property Taxes
17,871,034
17,760,500
100.6%
16,253,829
16,454,100
98.8%
Sales Taxes
15,037,534
15,560,000
96.6%
15,343,552
15,782,200
97.2%
Sales Taxes/Crim Justice
986,344
1,050,000
93.9%
1,012,546
950,000
106:6%
UtilitityTaxes
8,928,645
9,445,000
94.5%
10,554,911
8,540,000
123.6%
Other Taxes
5,121,171
4,596,000
111A%
4,969,823
4,481,000 ,
110.9%
Licenses & Permits
2,438,610
1,764,400
138.2%
2,098,082
1,538,800
136.3%
Grants
314,464
330,000
953%
183,739
145,000
126.7%
Intergovt Revenues
2,597,163
2,477,200
104.8%
2,462,497
2,279,000
108.1%
Charges for Services
2,517,595
2,023,300
124.4°%
2,417,329
1,904,400
126.9%
Fines & Forfeits
966,410
858,600
112.6%
943,256
792,100
119.1°%
Narcotics Seizure
76,774
25,000
307.1°%
49,837
25,000
199.3°%
Investment Interest
532,246
1,063,517
50.0%
1,664,405
1,070,500
155.5%
Miscellaneous
678,735
515,000
131.8°%
763,656
523,500
145.9%
Interfund Revenues
3,298,317
3,513,900
93.9°%
3,367,677
3,452,440
97.5%
Other Financing Sources
182,584
. 77,700
235.0%
133,335
77,650
171.7%
TOTALS
61,547,627
61,060,117.
100.8%
62,219,268
58,015,690
107.2%
H:\FinancelFinplanlMayors\Revenue\1999\a.2002 General Gov Revenuesxis Page 1 1/13/21109
ACT
BGT
% BC
JAN
-2,401
39,290
-6
FEB
129,449
100,629
128
MAR
398,096
431,310
92
APR
3,482,610
2.513,477
138
MAY
5,118,554
6,092,390
84
JUN
70,021
31,795
220
JUL
45,781
45,169
101
AUG
117,418
44,590
263
SEP
450,229
79,224
568
OCT
3,671,576
2,884,335
127
NOV
4,307,550
5,161,965
83
DEC
82,152
336,326
24
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
PROPERTY TAXES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2002
2002
TT
127,047
139,919
90.8%
525,143
571,229
91.9%
4,007,753
3,084,706
129.9%
9,126,307
9,177,096
99.4%
9,196,328
9,208,891
99.9%
9.242,109
9,254,060
99.9%
9,359,527
9,298,650
100.7%
9,809,756
9,377,874
104.6%
13,481,332
12,262,209
109.9%
17.788,883
17.424,174
102.1 %
17.871,034
17,760,500
100.6%
2001
®ADJ BGT
-+-ACT
$4.000.000
- - - --
$2,500,000
- -- ---- - -- ---- - --
$1.000,000
------- - --- - -- --- ...---.-- --
JAN FESMAR APR MAY JUN JUL AU SEP OCT NOV DEC
(E500,000)
92,093
78,822
116.
394,721
300,893
131.
2,300,251
3,214,422
71.
5,575,556
4,898,662
113.
29,097
117,852
24.
41,336
27,601
149.
40,807
-132,454
-30.
72,504
352,312
20.
2,639,650
2,379,380
110.
4,724,061
5,041,824
93.
307.797
141,755
217.
2001
ACT ADJ BGT % BGT
35,957 33,031 108.9% JAN
128,050 111,853 114.6% FEB
522,771 412,746 126.7% MAR
2,823,022 3,627.168 77.8% APR
8,398,578 8,525,830 98.5% MAY
8.427,675 8,643,682 97.5% JUN
8,469,011 8,671,283 97.7% JUL
8,509.818 8,538,829 99.7% AUG
8,582,322 8,891.141 96.5% SEP
11,221.971 11,270,521 99.6% OCT
15,946,032 16,312,345 97.8% NOV
16,253,829 16,454,100 98.8% DEC
H:\Finenee\Finplen\Mayor's\Revenue\1999\b.2002 Property Texes.xls Page 2 1/13/2003
SALES TAX BY SIC CODE
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2002
2002
BY INDUSTRY:
DESCRIPTION
2002
MONTHLY ACTIVITY YEAR TO DATE
02 ACT 02 BDGT % BDGT 02 ACT . 02 BDGT
% BDGT
Auto Dealers
280,153
361,223
77.6%
3.549,973
3,944,000
90.0%
Services
145,306
148,153
98.1%
1,835,039
2.179,000
84.2%
Const
202,113
145,562
138,8%
1,899,005
1,820,000
104.3%
General Retail
387,367
359,131
107.9%
4,600,384
4,263,000
107.9%
Whsle
143,178
153,269
93.4%
1,451,387
1,909,000
76.0%
Mnfg
38,487
68,543
56.1%
547,256
445,000
123.0%
Trans
131,815
59.748
220.6%
621,314
676,000
91.9%
Other
43,345
41,581
104.2%
546,397
454,000
120.4%
Total
1,371.764
1,337,211
102.6%
15,050,756
15.690,000
95.9%
-
$13.222 difference in
reporting for Feb 2002
2001
500,o0o .®01 ACT
®01 BDGT
400,000
300,000
200,000 --- - - - - -
100,000 --- - - - - -
0
Auto Services Const General Whsle Mfg Trans Other
Dealers Retail
DESCRIPTION
2001
MONTHLY ACTIVITY 12 MO.YEAR TO DATE
01 ACT 01 BDGT % BDGT 01 ACT 01 BDGT
% BGT
Auto Dealers
314,918
397,955
79.1%
3,307,794
3,967,000
83.4%
Services
148,086
151,403
97.8%
1,913.630
2,191,000
87.3%
Const
164,762
195,887
84.1%
2,060,061
1,830,000
112.6%
General Retail
388,066
389,879
99.5%
4,876,828
4,287,000
113.8%
Whsle
116.655
174,924
66.7%
1,535,709
1,920,000
80.0%
Mfg
35.384
55,009
64.3%
426,965
448,000
95.3%
Trans.
40,199
60,102
66.9%
648,177
680,000
95.3%
Other
49,593
39,382
125.9%
574,267
457,000
125.7%
Total
1,257,663
1,464,540
85.9%
15,343,430
15,780,000
97.2%
H:\Flnance\Finplan\Mayofe\Revenue\c.2002 Sales Taxes.xls
Page 3 1/13/2003
$300,000
$200,000
I $100,000
$0
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
UTILITY TAXES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2002
ictrical• Gas • Gas Use Tax Transfer Cable TV Telephone Cellular City Utilities
Station •14.2
2002
MTHLY ACTIVITY
YEAR TO DATE
DESCRIPTION
ACT
BGT
% BGT
ACT
Total BDGT
% BGT
Electrical'
227,151
298,000
76.2%
2,899,375
3,700,000
78.4%
Gas '
59,904
59,500
100.7%
808,790
700,000
115.5%
Gas Use Tax
0
0
N/A
258,780
225,000
115.0%
Transfer Station
25,867
23,600
109.6%
365,149
450,000
81.1%
Cable TV
-14,192
29,500
-48.1%
494,019
530,000
93.2%
Telephone
174,935
124,900
140.1%
1,350,646
1,150,000
117.4%
Cellular
77,003
118,100
65.2%
1.027,156
965,000
106.4%
City Utilities
151,783
136,900
110.9%
1,724,730
1,725,000
100.0%
Total
702,453
790,500
88.9%
8.928,645
9,445,000
94.5%
Note: Monthly budget allocation is based on an average of 1998 through 2001 actual activity.
Cable TV - Includes annual allocation ($30,000) to Fund 127
2001 May Revenue includes April receipts
2001
MTHLY ACTIVITY
YEAR TO DATE.
ACT
ADJ BGT
% BGT
ACT
ADJ YR'S BGT
% BGT
DESCRIPTION
270,993
283,000
95.8%
4,755,927
3,100,000
153.4%
Electrical
71,437
50,900
140.3% .
842,045
600,000
140.3%
Gas
0
0
N/A
206,229
150,000
137.5%
Gas Use Tax
31,684
22,200
142.7%
395,573
425,000
93.1%
Transfer Station
48,753
22,700
214.8%
517,114
405,000
127.7%
Cable TV
109,035
139,200
78.3%
1,257,903
1,280,000
98.3%
Telephone
60,025
88,800
67.6%
888,806
725,000
122.6%
Cellular
143,347
147,200
97.4%
1,691,313
1,855,000
91.2%
City Utilities
735,274
754,000
97.5%
10.554,911
8,540,000
123.6%
Total
H:\Finance\Finplan\Mayoes\Revenue%d.2002 Uliiility Taxes.xis
Page 4
1/13/2003
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2002
$1,100.000
1000.0 1054.5
®YR'S BGT - ------ -� . �-- --]
2002 YTD
® ACT
$850.000 -
743.0 785.9
$600.000
479_2 F481,5.
$350,000
225.0 1 235.1 j
$100,000 130.0 � 47.1
MVET MVET/ CJ Street Fuel Tex Liquor Ex/Profit Fire Dist #25 Other
($150,000)
2002
MONTHLY ACTIVITY
YEAR TO.DATE
DESCRIPTION
ACT
BGT
% BGT
ACT
YR'S BGT
% BGT
MVET
0
0
N/A
235,053
225,000
104.5%
MVET/ CJ
0
100
0.0%
47,137
30,000
157.1%
Street Fuel Tax
64,151
61,200
104.8%
765,854
743,000
103.1%
Liquor Ex/Profit
65,768
80,600
81.6%
464,488
479,200
96.9%
Fire Dist#25
527,239
493,400
106.9%
1,054,478
1,000,000
105.4%
Other
4,490
0
N/A
30,154
0
N/A
Total
661,648
635,300
104.1%
2,597,163
2,477,200
104.8%
Note: Monthly budget allocation is based on an average of 1998 through 2001 actual activity.
$1,000,000
®ADJ YR'S BGT 2001 YTD 1925:Of .963,7.1
MACT L il3,0.f73@,2.I
V50,000 - - ----- -- --- - - - - --- - --- - - - -
387.0 439.1
$500,000 --- - --- -- ---_------- -
1214.Q1228_7]
$250,000' - - - - -
$0
MVET MVET/ CJ Street Fuel Tax Liquor Ex/Profit Fire Dist #25 Other
2001
MONTHLY ACTIVITY 7 12 MO. YEAR TO DATE
4CT ADJ BGT % BGT I ACT ADJ YR'S BGT % BGT DESCRIPTION
0
0
N/A
228,673
214,000
106.9%
MVET
0
100
0.0%
46,428
35,000
132.7%
MVET/ CJ
64,560
59,100
109.2%
739.186
718,000
103.0%
Street Fuel Tax
53,849
65.200
82.6%
439,130
387,000
113.5%
Liquor Ex/Profit
481,841
456,400
105.6%
963,681
925.000
104.2%
Fire Dist #25
2,634
0
N/A
45,399
0
N/A
Other
602,884
580,800
103.8%
2,462,497
2,279,000
108.1 %
Total
Note: Monthly budget allocation is based on an average of 1997 through 2000 actual activity.
H:\FinaneakFinplanlMayor's\Revenue\e.2002 Intergovernmental Revs.xls Page 5 1/13/2003
2000 - 2002 Shut Off Comparison
DECEMBER 2002
Monthly Wracking Chart
Residential & Commercial
250
200
0
f
150
s
h
u
t
- 100
0
f
f
s
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
92000 Res/Comm 02001 Res/Comm M2002 Res/Comm
Jan Feb
0 Res/Comm 0 233
1 Res/Comm 160 127
Dec
Mar
Apr
May
Jun Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
143
0
175
114 210
153
135
153
167
55
92
144
83
146 105
142
123
153
128
49
133`,t ",
13WVW-k :.:¢ 110. "%a...' :r'127 3 ' t�1:34 ;ant '142
}:i 1A7- :
180
198
214:;
H:\Flnance\2001Budget\2001NewReports\Other\2002 shut OAS
Page 6
6,000,000
4,500,000
3,000,000
1,500,000
0
(1,500,000)
(3,000,000)
General Fund 000
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes: All Departments)
S Allocated Adj. Budget --0 Actual Expenditures — -A — Cum. Resources -Act Exp ---*—Total Resources
/8-"___ ___ __
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget 3,661,301 3,855,665 3,923,903 3,702,220 3,851,976 3,827,151 3,702,773 3,729,015 3,813,766 3,809,191 3,824,742 3,924,672 45,626,376
Actual Expenditures 4,310,099 3,372,609 3,275,056 3,597,587 3,310.166 3,673,081 3,269,369 3,510,836 3,301,685 3,737,146 3,297,212 4,458,035 43,112,882
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(1,214,224)
(962,371)
(1,079,624)
(649,573)
1,669,504
1,246,248
1,261,429
1,318,993
933,332
1,079,089
2,958,581
2,802,931
Actual Revenue
2,806,035
3,334,623
2,867,963
3,737,799
5,339,404
2,959,985
2,994,711
3,278,560
2,626,185
3,593,063
4,886,864
4,012,546 42,437,737
Adj Use of Prior Year Rev
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840
289,840 3,478,076
Total Resources
3,095,874
3,624,463
3,157,802
.4,027,639
5,629,243
3,249,825
3,284,551
3,568,399
2,916,025
3,882,903
5,176,704
4,302,385 45,915,813
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
June expenditures does not reflect an Operating transfer of $1.8 million from Fund Balance.
H.\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2OO2\a. General Fund 2O02.xis Page 7 1/13/2003
Department: Administrative, Judicial, & Legal Services
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes: Mayor's Office, Hearing Examiner, City Clerk)
-*-Allocated Adj. Budget Actual Expenditures - -A- Cum. Under/(Over)
150,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
30,000
0
/
/
/
/
00
L
(30,000)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
131,434
109,612
109,786
112;499
113,463
108,605
107,797
105,286
106,421
111,942
109,673
123,778 1,350,297
Actual Expenditures
139,304
87,806
98,359
90,940
101,060
98,356
104,972
93,322
100,826
118,564
92,204
103,814 1,229,526
Cum. Under/(Over)
(7,871)
13,935
25,363
46,922
59,325
69,574
72,399
84,364
89,959
83,338
100,807
120,771
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
The Municipal Arts Commission has been moved from the Executive Division of the General Fund into the Parks fund as of May 1999.
HAFINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\b.AJLS 2002.xls
Page 8
1/13/2003
Division: Hearing Examiner
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: AJLS (General Governmental Funds)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
9,215
9,822
10,265
9,974
9,713
9,757
9,775
9,790
10,031
9,860
9,810
11,288 119,300
Actual Expenditures
9,910
9,525
9,520
9,780
9,695
9,511
9,904
9,881
9,628
10,161
9,773
9,923 117,212
Cum. Under/(Over)
(695)
(398)
347
541
559
805
675
584
987
686
723
2,088
Note: The Budget allocation Is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2O02\b.AJLS 2O02.xls Page 9 1/13/2003
Division: City Clerk
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: AJLS (General Governmental Funds)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
65,491
41,711
33,552
37,492
32,589
34,444
31,523
30,125
32,556
35,028
34,071
47,015 455,597
Actual Expenditures
66,408
26,244
27,849
25,961
24,850
28,702
26,078
26,765
26,830
40,400
27,836
35,941 383,863
Cum. Under/(Over)
(917)
14,550
20,253
31,784
39,523
45,265
50,710
54,070
59,797
54,426
60,660
71,734
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENS92002\b.AJLS 2002.xls Page 10 1/13/2003
Division: Mayor's Office
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department, AJLS (General Governmental Funds)
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget _ 55,469 57,623 66,133 65,066 71,748 64,557 66,865 65,724 63,969 67,305 66,022 64,918 775,400
Actual Expenditures _ 62,986 52,037 60,989 55,200 66,516 60,143 68,990 56,675 64,367 68,003 54,595 57,950 728,450
Cum. Under/(Over) (7,517) (1,931) 3,213 13,080 18,312 22,726 20,602 29,651 29,253 28,555 39,981 46,950
Note: The Budget allocation Is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
The Municipal Arts Commission has been moved from the Executive Division of the General Fund Into the Parks fund as of May 1999.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\b.AJLS 2002.xls Page 11 1/13/2003
150,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
30,000
0
(30,000)
Division: Court Services
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: AJLS (General Governmental Funds)
�-�-Allocated Adj.. Budget Actual Expenditures - -6 - Cum. Under/(Over) - Historical Cum. Under/(Over) - Str Lined
i
- --- --- -
i
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
89,751
110,057
103,357
110,116
110,892
103,155
109,186
107,097
109,899
117,827
109,400
115,064
1,295,800
Straight Lined Adj. Budget
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
107,983
1,295,800
Actual Expenditures
93,033
97,354
99,530
123,094
95,385
105,001
100,686
101,578
100,696
102,187
101,672
101,897
1,222,113
Cum. Under/(Over) - Historical
(3,282)
9,421
13,247
269
15,776
13,931
22,430
27,949
37,152
52,793
60,521
73,687
Cum. Under/(Over) - Str Lined
14,950
25,580
34,033
18,923
31.521
34,503
41,801
48,206
55,493
61,289
67,601
73,687
-
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUOGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\c.Court Services 2002.x1s
Page 12
1/13/2003
Division: City Attorney
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: AJLS (General Governmental Funds)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Budget
83,831
87,291
83,177
101,801
82,317
81,381
85,222
72,900
83,852
91,440
101,045
69,543 1,023,800
_
Actual Expenditures
80,204
73,423
59,407
83,879
87,906
92,680
86,215
75,932
99,234
74,931
78,150
79,351 _ 971,31.2_
Cum. Under/(Over)
_
T ^3,628
17,495
41,265
59,187
53,598
42,299
41,305
38,273
22,892
39,401
62,296
52,488
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\d.City Attorney 2002.xls Page 13 1/13/2003
Department: Economic Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes General Fund: All Divisions)
#-Allocated Adj. Budget -0-Actual Expenditures - -6 -- Cum. Under/(Over) - Historical -- A- Cum. Under/(Over) - Str Lined
300,000
J
250,000
/
200,000 _._.. _.. -- - - - .._.. - ----
i
150,000
i
100,000
i
50,000 _ - - - -r -- -- -- ---
i
0 -
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
88,163
99,324
110,293
111,212
104,546
98,948
99,570
117,100
110,879
120,446
142,943
Straight Lined Adj. Budget
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018
117,018 1,404,221
Actual Expenditures
85,021
99,495
93,412
88,026
82,392
96,082
86,828
99,530
85,125
107,174
107,693
80,729 1,111,505
Cum. Under/(Over) - Historical
3,142
2,971
19,852
43,039
65,192
68,059
80,802
98,372
124,126
137,398
172,649
292,716
Cum. Under/(Over) - Str Lined
31,998
49,521
73,127
102,120
136,746
157,683
187,874
205,363
237,256
247,101
256,426
292,716
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\e.Economic Development 2002.xis Page 14 1/13/2003
Department: Finance and Information Services
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes General Fund: Finance, Printing Services, Information Systems)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
209,528
270,275
271,829
250,921
257,327
269,435
273,263
252,420
259,160
268,470
258,949
271,123 3,112,700
Actual Expenditures
243,079
260,439
250,115
267,932
206.990
264,201
231,400
268,889
218,576
278,379
255,952
282,690 3,028,640
Cum. Underl(Over)
(33,550)
(23,715)
(2,000)
(19,011)
31,327
36,561
78,424
61,955
102,539
92,630
95,627
84,060
Department: Human Resources and Risk Management (All)
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental and Internal Service Funds (Includes General Fund and Insurance Fund)
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget 1,112,370 632,908 628,768 713,436 703,270 693,821 720,484 672,707 587,987 678,977 741,658 694,316 8,580,700
Actual Expenditures 914.351 891,203 570,470 654,730 647,779 534,001 667,427 718,418 554,581 885,069 600.527 258,357 7,896,914
Cum. Under/(Over) 198,019 (60,276) (1,979) 56,727 112,217 272,037 325,093 279,382 312,789 106,697 247,828 683,786
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\g.HR Risk Mgmt 2002.xis Page 16 1/13/2003
Division: Personnel Administration, Civil Service
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department : HR & RM (General Governmental Fund)
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated_Adj. Budget _ 51,382 55,625 61,507 62,017 56,407 57,919 55,765 54,990 57,250 _ 51,092 58,843 81,804 704,600
Actual Expenditures 45,645 42,466 54,852 74.800 41,248 57,631 49,037 48,779 42,845 ^ 46,380 65,606 66,268 635,558
------ ---------------- -- ------ --- - -- ------------- - ---------------------
Cum. Under/(Over) 5,736 18,895 25,549 12,766 27,925 28,213 34,941 41,152 55,557 60,269 53,506 69,042
Note. The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUDGETWayor's EOM\EXPENS92002\g.HR Risk Mgmt 2002.xis Page 17 1/13/2003
Insurance Fund 502
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Human Resources and Risk Management
Ending Fund Balance
6,000,000
®Ending Fund Balance -0-Ending Fund Bal Based on Bud -- A 8% Of General Fund
5,500,000 - - - - - ---- - ----- - - --- - -- - -- - --- -
5,000,000 - ^~
4,500,000 - - -----. .. - -- -- -
4,000,000 - - - - - -----
3,500,000 ----- - - -- -- ----- -
3,000,000
Actual Activity vs. Budget
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
I
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Beginning Fund Balance
4,417,350
4,186,528
4,043,254
4,205,627
4,275,440
4,338,685
4,472,688
4,472,097
4,434,543
4,579,226
4,354,842
4,429,897
5,484,020
Actual Expenditures
868,705
848,737
515,618
579,930
606,532
476,370
618,390
669,639
511,736
838,689
534,921
192,089
7,261,355
Actual Revenue
637,884
705,463
677,991
649,742
669,777
610,373
617,799
632,085
656,419
614,305
609,975
1,246,212
8,328,025
Ending Fund Balance
4,186,528
4.043,254
4,205,627
4,275,440
4,338,685
4,472,688
4,472,097
4,434,543
4,579,226
4,354,842
4,429,897
5,484,020
6,550,690
Allocated Adj. Budget
1,059,438
577,425
567,644
651,552
646,810
635,938
664,587
617,707
531,086
627,704
682,735
613,474
7,876,100
Revenue Adj. Bud -Straight liner
656,342
656,342
656.342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
656,342
7,876,100
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
190,732
(80,580)
(28:554)
43,069
83,347
242,916
289,112
237,181
256,530
45,546
193,360
614,745
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
The Rainy Day Reserve reflects 6% of the 2003 Budget for General Governmental funds.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\g.HR Risk Mgmt 2002.xis Page 18 1/13/2003
CITY OF RENTON
FUND 502 - INSURANCE FUND
DRAFT - YEAR TO DATE THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001
Program
Risk Management/Property & Liability:
Premium Revenue
Other Revenue
Claims
Other Costs
Total Costs
Total Property/Liability Income (Loss)
Healthcare (Medical):
Premium Revenue
Claims
Total Healthcare (Medical) Income (Loss)
Healthcare (Dental):
Premium Revenue
Claims
Total Healthcare (Dental) Income (Loss)
Other Costs
Total Healthcare Income (Loss)
Industrial insurance:
Premium Revenue
Claims
State Administration Costs
Other Costs
Total Costs
Total industrial Insurance Income (Loss)
2002 2002 % 2001 2001 %
Actual Budget Bdgt Actual Ad' Bd t Bd t
1,718,823
1,537,300
111.8%
162,783
0
N/A
(295,855)
(939.200)
31.5%
(557.4371
(649.1.001
85.9%
(853.292)
(1,588,300)
53.7%
1,028,314
(51,000)
1,611,026
1,551,000
103.9% (a)
22,715
0
N/A (b)
(834,977)
(1.051,600)
79.4%
(556.259)
(626,000)
88.9% (c)
(1.391.236)
(1.677,600)
82.9%
242,504
(126,600)
4,078,623 4,509,900 90.4% 3,671,141 3,532,161 103.9%
(4.445.198) (3.783.200) 117.5% (3.801.760) (2,992.800) 127.0%
(366,575) 726,700 (130,619) 539,361
999,071
1,058,500 94.4%
(718,245)
(925,000) 77.6%
280,826
133,500
(263,386)
(220,600) 119.4%
(349,135)
639,600
560,215
457,400
122.5%
(411,522)
(.291.000)
141.4%
(140,979)
(89,000)
158.4%
(41,461)
(72.000)
57.6%
(593,962)
(452,000)
131.4%
(33,747)
5,400
_
909,991
879,310 103.5 %
(735,675)
(818,345) 89.9%
174,316
60,965
(225,508)
(216,100) 104.4% (d)
(181,811)
384,226
516,380
456,494
113.1%
(500,790)
(270,000)
.1.85.5%
(129.204)
(93,200)
138.6%
,35,912)
(66,400)
54.1% (e)
(665,906)
(429,600)
155.0%
(149,526)
26,894
Unemployment:
Premium Revenue 113,000 113,000 100.0% 65,900 114,744 57.4%
Claims (90,959) (113,000) 80.5% (66,730) (108,600) 61.4%
Total Unemployment Income (Loss) 22,041 0 (830) 6,144
Other.
Revenue
Costs
695,510 200,000 347.8% 2,411,572 2,250,000 107.2% (f)
(296,313) (193,000) 153.5% (537.963) (2,286,000) 23.5% (g)
Total Insurance Programs Income (Loss) 1,066,670 601,000 1,783,945 254,664
(a) + Judgements & Settlements
(b) FEMA
(c) Salaries/Benefits, Supplies, Third Party Administrator, Other Insurance, Travel/Training, Arthur Gallagher Insurance Prog, Memberships,
Publications, State Self -Insurance Tax, Capital Outlay
(d) Admin Costs, Health & Wellness Program, Broker Fees, Employee Assistance Program
(e) Third Party Administrator
(0 Invest Interest, Interest on Contracts, Tsf-Ins, Misc, Interfd Loan Repmt
(g) Indirect Costs Reimbursement to General Fund, 125 Plan Enrollment Fee, Emergency Services
Total Per Status Reports:
Revenues
Expenditures
Net
cc: Mayor Tanner
Victoria Runkle
Eileen Flott
8,328,025 7,876,100
(7,261,355) (7,275,100)
1,066,670 601,000
9,208,725 8,783,709
(7,424,780) (8,529,045)
1,783,945 254,664
H:\finplan\mayorslfundsla_502 2002.xls Page 19 1/1312003
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
(1,000,000)
(2,000,000)
Department: Community Services
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes: General Fund, Parks Fund, Library Fund)
-0 Allocated Adj. Budget N Actual Expenditures - --A - Cum. Resources -Act Exp ..,,_... --- Total Total Resources
/A j
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated_Adj. Budget
766,303
976.683
1,035,538
1,024,457
1,285,075
1,096,909
1,217,012
1,273,925
1,117,495
1,114,979
1,065,883
1,484,163
13,458,422
Actual Expenditures
680,150
796,041
808,266
889,181
908,890
3,030,774
1,011,535
1,054,187
846,546
995,722
_ 872,705
1,046,130
12,940,126
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(119,206)
(328,501)
(531,076)
563,391
1,686,935
(1,043,264)
(1,287,667)
(1,812,639)
(1,701,916)
84,875
1,118,739
(1,221)
Actual Revenue
380,718
406,520
425,464
1,803,421
1,852,207
120,348
586,905
348,988
771,042
2,608.286
1,726,341
(260,057)
10,770,184
Adj Use of Prior Year Rev
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
2,162,722
Total Resources
560,944
586,746
605,690
1,983.648
2,032,434
300,575
767,131
529,215
951.269
2,788,513
1,906,568
(19,830)
12,932,906
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGE1Wayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\h.Community Services 2002.xls Page 20 1/13/2003
Parks Fund 101
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Community Services (General Governmental Funds)
�i►---Allocated Adj. Budget -0-Actual Expenditures - -�A -- Cum, Resources -Act Exp • -�4*-~ Total Resources
3,000,000
2,250,000
1,500,000
750,000
0
1
(750,000)
(1,500,000)
A
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
633,928
838,681
875,222
877,432
1,121,019
941,092
1,050,445
1,079,980
952.819
943,290
885,646
1,244,469
11,444,022
- _. _------- ----- -- -- -
Actual Expenditures
--
569,974
652,546
679,217
739,773
738,787
2,880,974
832,431
856,226
686,553
774,363
--- ---
717,091
854,032
--- -
10,981,968
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(13,012)
(82,609)
(160,150)
730,028
1,669,360
(914,538)
(987,283)
(1,318,424)
(1,46ti,064)
244,407
1,079,829
466,972
Actual Revenue_
. 376,735
402,723
421,449
1,449,724
1,497,893
116,849
579,459
344,858
359,686
2,303.607
1,372,287
60,948
9,286,218
_
Adj Use of Prior Year
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
180,227
2,162,722
_Rev_
Total Resources -
556,962
582,950
601,676
1,629,951
1,678,119
297,076
759,686
525,085
539,913
2,483,833
_
1,552,513
241,175
11,448,940
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCEMOGEI\Mayor's EOM\EXPEll SE\2002\h.Community Services 2002.xls Page 21 1/13/2003
Library Fund 106
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Community Services (General Governmental Funds)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
102,998
115,599
124,535
111,701
116,355
120,601
119,265
121,089
115,936
125,322
121,808
143,889
1,439,100
Actual Expenditure's
-91-,564
126,554
111,401
115,482
126,255
110,532
140,504
116,622
120,145
138,166
112,314
115,607
1,425,145
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(8/.!)81)
(210,338)
(311,125)
148,549
41,517
(W,b42)
(204,034)
87,177
253,691
495,432
58,820
Actual Revenue
Adj Use of Prior Year Rev
3,982
0
3,797
0
4,015
0
353,697
0
354,315
0
3,499
0
7,445
0
4,130
0
411,356
0
304,679
0
354,055
0
(32 1.0W))
0
1,483,966
0
Total Resources
3,982
3,797
4,015
353,697
354,315
3,499
7,445
4,130
411,356
304,679
-4
35,665
(32 1 00!))
1,483,966
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCHUDGETWayor's EOMIEXPENSE\2002\h.Community Services 2002.xls Page 22 1/13/2003
Division: Human Services
DRAFT -.December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart .
Department: Community Services (General Governmental Funds)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
24,612
21,428
33,211
35,553
53,404
35,452
50,334
74,869
49,509
45,015
55,407
96,505 575,300
Actual Expenditures
18,612
16,941
17,647
33,926
43,848
39,268
38,599
81,339
39,849
83,193
43,300
76,491 533,013
Cum. Under/(Over)
6,000
10,487
26,051
27,679
37,235
33,419
45,153
38,683
48.343
10,165
22,273
42,287
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCEMOGE-Wayur's EOWEXPENSEVOOM.Community Services 2002.xls Page 23 1/13/2003
Municipal Golf Course System Fund 404
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Community Services
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
102,566
132,124
149,100
154,340
180,829
453,833
144,336
144,692
135,075
153,664
132,742
456,900
2,340,200
Actual Expenditures
111,771
95,323
160,743
165,368
150,917
254,838
140,810
176,510
134,073
132,705
108,127
447,576
2,078,763
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(45,N5)
(38,453)
(105,236)
(65,949)
37,233
59,435
- 265,254
- 400,910
537,871
577,389
566,145
- 207,426
-
Actual Revenue
66,056
102,585
93,960
204,655
254,098
277,040
346,630
312,165
271,034
172,223
96,884
88,858
2,286,188
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE`,BUDGETWayors EON,i\EX PENSE\2002\i.Golf Course 404 2002.xls Page 24 1/1X2003
CITY OF RENTON
FUND 404 - MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SYSTEM OPERATING FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND FUND BALANCE
Draft - Year to Date Through December 31, 2002 & December 31, 2001
Beginning Fund Balance
OPERATING REVENUES:
Charges for Services:
Merchandise Sales
Green Fees
Driving Range Fees
Miscellaneous Charges
Miscellaneous Revenues:
Cart Rentals
Clubhouse Room Rentals
Concessionaire/Restaurant
Miscellaneous Revenues
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration:
Salary & Benefits
Supplies
Other Svc & Charges
Interfund Payments
Total Administration
Maintenance.
Salary & Benefits
Supplies
Other Svc & Charges
Total Maintenance
Proshop/Driving Range:
Salary & Benefits
Supplies
Merchandise Purchases
Other Svc & Charges
Total Proshop/Driving Range
Other Costs:
Miscellaneous
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Fund 404 - Operations Fund 404 - Operations
2002 Actual 2002 Bgt % Bgt F2001 Actual 2001 Adj Bgt % Bgt
1,216,721 1,216,721 100.0% 1,145,231 1,145,231 100.0%
166,712
195,000
85.5%
192,633
195,000
98.8%
1,212,443
1,267,200
95.7%
1,237,587
1,347.245
91.9%
364,313
370,000
98.5%
347,095
350,000
99.2%
53,830
46,000
117.0%
46,155
41.000
112.6%
207,225
200,000
103.6%
62,529
70,000
89.3%
131,700
130,000
101.3 %
37,982
22,000
172.6%
2,236,734
2,300,200
97.2%
173,638
216,900
80.1%
11,453
24,500
46.7%
57,983
43,900
132.1%
115,300
115,300
100.0%
358,374
400,600
89.5%
379,943
407,000
93.4%
114,253
97,900
116.7%
50,410
90,200
55.9%
544,606
595,100
91.5%
296,299
317,200
93.4%
34,295
54,700
62.7%
84,274
147,400
57.2%
36,558
7,600
481.0%
451,426
526,900
85.7%
0 0 N/A
1,354,406 1,522,600 89.0%
194,677
195,000
99.8%
71,158
70,000
101.7%
135,156
125,000
108.1 %
88,880
18,000
493.8%
2,313,341
2,341,245
98.8%
144,502
203,548
71.0%
11,560
24,281
47.6%
50,733
43,444
116.8%
112,999
112,999
100.0%
319,795
384,272
83.2%
417,801
372,469
112.2 ° o
112,701
96,937
116.3%
129,619
89,269
145.2%
660,120
558,675
118.2%
290,635
306,571
94.8%
51,448
54,748
94.0%
138,687
145,423
95.4%
24,425
7,621
320.5%
505,195
514,363
98.2%
186 0 N/A
1,485,296 1,457,310 101.9 %
Income (Loss) fm Operations 882,327 777,600 . 113.5% 828,046 883,935 93.7%
NON -OPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSE):
Investment Interest.
16,748
40,000
.41.9%
Operating Tsf-in Gen Fd
0
0
N/A
Sale of Restaurant Equipment
32,707
0
N/A
Refunding Rev Bond Proceeds
0
0
N/A
Debt Service
473.533)
(475.500) .
99.6%
Payment to Refunding Trustee
0
0
N/A
Tsf to Capital Fund
"50.000)
'150.000)
100.0%
Capital Improvements
;100,323)
(124.700)
80.9%
TOTAL NON -OPERATING
(674.901)
(710,200)
95.0%
45,797
50,000
91.6%
0
0
N/A
15,422
25,000
61.7%
0
0
N/A
(458.393)
i455.508)
100.7%
0
0
N/A
(311.196)
(373.436)
83.3%
040.749)
(165.000)
85.3%
(849,619)
(918,944)
92.5%
Total Net Income (Loss) 207,426 67,400 307.8% (21,573) (35,009) 61.6%
Ending Fund Balance 1,424.147 1,216,721 117.0% 1,123,658 1.145,231 98.1%
Bond Reserve 441,358 441,358 100.0% 441,358 441,358 100.0%
Unreserved Ending Fund Balance 982,789 775,363 126.8% 682,300 703,873 96.9%
cc: Mayor Tanner Victoria Runkle
Leslie Betlach File
Golf Course Mgr
1/13/2003 4:13 PM
Page 25
i:\woAung\workshts\b 404_2002.xis
Department: Fire
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes General Fund: All Divisions)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
1,067,506
924,549
949,501
923,127
939,434
949,938
921,666
939,021
912,217
936,179
947,969
1.066,392 11,477,500
Actual Expenditures
1,137,505
865,243
935,188
931,528
896,330
929,327
882,663
919,482
942,038
951,650
921,159
_ 970,207 11,282,219
Cum. Under/(Over)
(69,998)
(10,692)
31621
(4 781)
38.324
58,935
97,938
117,476
87,655
72,285
99,095
195,281
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average o11996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANGMUDGETWayoCs EOM1E/,PENSEOMI.Fire 2002.xis Page 26 1/13/2003
Department: Fire
DRAFT - December 2002
Fire Department Overtime Expense Analysis
General Governmental Funds
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000003 Disability OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000005 Holdover OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000006 Training OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000011 Straight Time
" Payback (S-c.•T.ne Register)
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000012. Holiday/Double Time
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000003 Disability OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000005 Holdover OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000006 Training OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000011 Straight Time
Payback (source -Tens Register)
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020 10.000012 Holiday/Double Time
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000003 Disability OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020 10.000005 Holdover OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000006 Training OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000011 Straight Time
" Payback (Source -Ten. Register)
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000012 Holiday/Double Time
$250.000-------
$225,000------------
$200.000 -- ---------------....-
$175.000
$125.000
$100,000 - ----------
$75.000 -
$50000 ,
($25,000)
2000 Dollars
Jan
Feb
Mar
Aar
may
Ignn
Jul
Ayg
Seo
Oct
Nov
DDc
Total
1.701.54
734.31
118.40
(8956)
0.00
456.55
0.00
0.00
16,015.51
22.389.73
19,626.82
19,454.94
$80,408,22
7.216.07
7,566.60
3,451.38
2,755.46
6,032.05
3,146.96
4,024.37
5,476.24
5,825.33
3,717.59
(5.690.62)
1,705.56
$45,227.01
3,395.04
2,374.06
12,349.11
12.891.82
14.561.21
10,742.71
668.85
0.00
8,441,69
10.979.14
27,143.98
13.747.95
.$117,295.56
16,020.22
7,542.79
7,705.91
5.597.99
3.749.29
682.43
11,938.34
17,022.58
720.04
0.00
672.08
0.00
$71,651.67
165,168.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
$165,168.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
672.08
12,361.93
13,260.32
$26.294.33
193,500.87
18.217.76
23,624.80
21,155.69
24,342.55
15,028.67
16,631.56
22,498.82
31.002.57
37,758.54
54.114.19
48.168.77
$506,044 79
2001 Dollars .. -,,..
Jan
may
JIMBSI
�9
�
�!
Nov
Dec
IgLa1
4.430.74
645.93
1,610.23
190.65
981.01
1,136.33
6.120.35
7,664.64
6.507.91
9,019.20
21,675.20
26,290.38
$86,272.57
2,358.54
1,042.26
737.61
1,072.10
727.22
1.580.89
5.407.88
10,398.62
3.084.08
2,302.35
3,426.54
2,760.09
$34.900.18
4,059.23
5,471.13
12,764.84
11.521.03
21,116.17
1,202.05
350.84
2,154.34
644.50
(15,214,49)
7.649.87
4,252.09
$55,971.60
5,535.84
12.546.48
11,815.20
6,594,60
13,696.52
23,721.72
12,865.80
(866 86)
0.00
796.14
0.00
0.00
$86,907.42
157,126.32
1,272.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
$158.398.56
22.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14,378.06
14.127,29
$28,527.66
173.532.96
20,978.04
26,927.88
19.378.38
36,722.92
27,640.99
24.744.87
19,350.72
10,236-49
(3,09660) 47,131.69
47.429,85
$450,977.99
2002 Dollars'
Jan
fe
Mar
Aar
May
Jun
Jul
AugSSen
Oct
Nov
DecTotal
5,821.16
2,072.47
1,431.16
1,026.36
2,907.51
1.582.09
1,046.13
2,169.36
10.663.05
4,807.02
0.00
29,381.39
$62,907.70
1,154.53
1,045.36
1.872.84
1,641.09
1.632.96
1.556.03
1.913.28
5,376.84
3.040.40
945.78
0.00
10.698.56
$30.877.69
7,869.27
2.316.30
4.912.16
1,419.93
4,517.14
1,734.90
2,104.94
4,820.55
33,90619
1,830.21
0.00
30,818.27
$96,249.86
20.720.88
12.723.48
9.842.04
8,759.40
6,160.38
7,925.70
10,503.12
7.090.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$83,725.20
177,137.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
$177.13765
2,975.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30,417.70
$33.393.24
215,679.03
18,157.63
18,058.20
12.646.78
15,217.99
12,798.72
15,567.47
19,456.95
47,609.64
7,583.01
0.00 101.315 92
$484,291.34
® Holiday/Double
Time
® Payback (Sour(
Time Register)
O Straight Time
OTraining OT
® Holdover OT
® Disability OT
-r 2002
--A- 2001
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DeG
$260,000
------ - - - -
------ - -----
-- -___
S Holiday/Double
$225.000
-- -
------
Time
IN Payback (Source-
$200,000
---
-- ----
Time Register)
0 Straight Time
$175,000
__-______--_
$150,000
__
0Tralning OT
$125,000
----------
® Holdover OT
-- - ------ •
0 Disability OT
$100.000
$75,000
$50,000
$25,000
/
$0
J
n Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug sep Oct Nov
H TINANCE\aUOGETWayur's EOM10tber0002 FIRE OT.rds Page 27
Department: Fire
DRAFT - December 2002
Fire Department Overtime Hour Analysis
General Governmental Funds
(Includes General Fund: Suppression only)
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000003 Disability OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000005 Holdover OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000006 Training OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000011 Straight Time
" Payback
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000012 Holiday/ Double Time
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000003 Disability OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000005 Holdover OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000006 Training OT
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000011 Straight Time
Payback
E 000.000000.009.5220.0020.10.000012 Holiday/ Double Time
600
700
600
500
N
0400
2
300
200
100
D*abdky OT Holdover OT nanlny OT
2001 Hours
Jan
Feb
Mir
6z
Mgy
Jun
,�
Aug
deg
Oct
Nov_
Dec
Total
121.0
18.5
42.5
5.0
24.0
32.3
167.5
197.0
169.5
243.5
579.5
704.5
2.304.8
63.5
28.0
20.5
29.5
19.5
42.0
135.0
250.0
87.0
62.0
97.0
67.0
901.0
103.0
139.0
303.0
395.5
511.5
56.5
38.5
48.0
44.0
174.5
196.8
149.0
2,159.3
216.0
504.0
492.0
252.0
516.0
924.0
504.0
(24.0)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3,384.0
6,096.0
72.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.168.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
472.0
468.0
941.0
6,600.5
761.5
858.0
682.0
1,071.0
1,054.8
845.0
471.0
300.5
480.0
1.345.3
1,388.5
15,858.0
2002 Hours
Jan
Feb
Mar
61ur
May
un
Jul
Aug
Sao
Oct
!2v
Dec
Total YTQ
145.5
53.0
37.5
28.5
62.0
41.5
28.5
48.0
261.0
318.0
150.5
372.5
1,546.5
32.0
25.5
49.5
42:0
36.5
37.5
50.0
125.0
73.0
187.0
63.5
38.5
760.0
185.0
53.0.
106.0
30.8
100.3
40.0
48.0
103.5
826.0
136.5
359.0
255.8
2,243.8
760.0
480.0
372.0
304.0
229.0
301.0
402,0
252.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3,120.0
6,456.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.456.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
520.5
496.0
1,116.5
7,698.5
611.5
565.0
405.3
427.8
420.0
528.5
528.5
1,160.0
641.5
1,093.5
1,162.8
15,242.8
Sveghl Tine Payback Holiday/ Doubte T"ne
HAFINnNMBUDGETWay,Ws E0M,01he,,' )12 FIRE_OT.%is Page 28
Department: Fire
DRAFT - December 2002
Fire Department Overtime Analysis
General Governmental Funds
(Includes General Fund: Suppression only)
2002
Fire Suppression Hours
8,000
7,000
6.000
5.000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1.000
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2001
Fire Suppression Hours
8,000
7.000
lffil
2,000
1VZ
1,000
2
N
H
I
--,
i
I
Q
M.
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
H.kFINANCE\BUDGE'RMayor's EOWOtheA2002 FIRE_OT.As Page 29
Department: Police
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (Includes General Fund: All Divisions)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget_
1,017,729
1,217,812
1,234,246
1,109,746
1,220,088
1,190,154
1,105,617
. 1,182,270
1,147,230
1,210,165
1,126,349
1,383,494 14,144,900
Actual Expenditures _
1,006,659
1,188,112
1,032,414
1,249,245
1,138,937
1,291,554
1,044,475
1,195,529
1,036,293
1,352,684
1,028,911
1,194,727 13,759,541`
Cum. Under/(Over)
11,070
40,770
242,601
103,102
184,254
82,854
143,995
130,737
241,674
99,154
196,592
385,359
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\k.Police 2OO2.xls Page 30 1/13/2003
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
General Governmental Funds (includes General Fund: Administration, Development Services, Technical Services
Street Fund: Transportation Systems, Maintenance Services)
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget 693,251 831,798 835,577 789,447 890,269 821,533 816,709 841,627 801,586 814,297 802,411 1,228,996 10,167,500
Actual Expenditures 689,826 732,997 715,237 772,029 750,370 772,813 769,975 789,886 748,132 859,602 756,005 738,334 9,095,206
Cum. Under/(Over) 3,424 102,225 222,565 239,983 379,883 428,603 475,337 527,077 580,531 535,226 581,632 1,072,294
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
June expenditures does not reflect an Operating transfer of $425,000 from Fund Balance in the Street Fund.
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\I.PBPW 000 2002.x1s Page 31 1/13/2003
Street Construction Fund 317
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
194,855
631,321
406,583
360.535
650,435
784,929
739,244
942,157
659,789
- 851,891
- 510,389
- 830,671
7,562,800
Proj. Mgr. Spending Plan
30,000
100,000
199,845
500,051
851,417
678,134
999,874
745,751
850,475
688,112
187,563
- 130,222
_ 5,961,444
Actual Expenditures
25,285
150,120
132,444
247,285
439,031
-
576,014
109,446
399,389
--
711,013
182,654
---
1,303,168
50371 ,2
--
- 4,779,559
-
_.---------
Cum. Under/(Ovef) Plan'
41715
(45,405)
-
21,997
274,762
687,149
789,269
1,679,697
2,026,059
2,165,521
2,670,980
1,555,375
1,181,885
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
Cum. Under/(Over) Plan" based on Project Manager Spending Plan
HAFINANCR UDGET\Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\m.Street Construction 317 2002.xls Page 32 M3/2003
Waterworks Utility Funds 4.01/451
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
---*—Allocated Adj. Budget G - Actual Expenditures — -9 — Cum. Resources -Act Exp - --)- - Actual Revenue
4,500,000
3,250,000
2,000,000
750,000
(500.000)
(1,750,000)
(3,000,000)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
' Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
. -------
1,297,980
1,768,320
----
1,750,537
3,033,983
1,838,821
3,374,692
1,958,744
1,829,940
-------
1,616,041
----
3,166,053
-- --
1,965,159
----
2,338,930
25,939,200
Actual Expenditures
1,508,307
1,482,938
1,737,781
2,838,512
1,706,110
4,180,073
2,483,430
1,656,229
1,615,473
1,898,703
--
1,839,145
-----
1,962,533
._.. -- - -
24,909,233
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
457,210
---------
454,147
646,129
(447.242)
(205.394)
(2,803,023)
(1,t87,:iti7)
(1,016,314)
(;3,12,410-1
--------------
(11,7Kii)
514,570
414,584
Actual Revenue
1,965,516
1,479,875
1,929,763
1,745,141
1,947,959
1,582,444
4,098,886
1,827,482
2,289,377
2,223,353
2,371,475
-------.._...---------
1,862,547
25,323,817
Plote: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures
H;\FINANCE\BUDGET\Mayor's EO M\EXP ENS E\2002\n.Wate rworks Utility 401 2002.xls Page 33 1/13/2003
CITY OF RENTON
FUND 401 - WATERWORKS UTILITY OPERATING FUND
AND FUND 451 WATERWORKS REVENUE BOND FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND FUND BALANCE
Draft Year to Date Through December 31, 2002
ACTUALS Total %
Utility Water Wastewater METRO Surface Water Total Budget Bdgt
Beginning Fund Balance 3,576,367 1,528,093 248.6'0! 1,272,278 6,128,128 6,128,128 100.0%
REVENUES:
Licenses & Permits
0
30,010
0.
1,470
31,480
22,000
143.1%
Rate Revenue
7,777,211
3,565,520
7,338,780
2,666,466
21,347,977
21,952,100
97.2%
Inspection/Approval Fees
52,348
78,994
0
159,617
290,959
310,000
93.9%
Interfund Revenues
247,575
225.521
0
384,667
857,763
779,600
110.0%
Investment Interest
46,114
13,456
0
25,126
84,696
250,000
33.9%
Bryn Mawr Payment
37,874
0
0
0
37,874
37,900
99.9%
WSDOT Reimb/1-405 Retentn Pond
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
Misc Revenues
80,310
821
0
0
81,131
81,600
99.4%
Water Installation Fees
202,069
0
0
0
202,069
140,900
143.4%
Revenue Bond Proceeds
1,314,460
606,674
0
101,112
2,022,246
2,022,246
100.0%
Disposal of Fixed Assets
0
0
0
300,000
300,000
0
N/A
Other Financing Sources
0
67,621
0
0
67,621
0
N/A
TOTAL REVENUES
9,757,961
4,588,616
7,338,780
3,638,458
25,323,816
25,596,346
98.9%
EXPENSES:
Utility Engineering:
Salaries & Benefits
531,485
301,454
0
408,829
1,241,768
1,305,000
95.2%
Other Svc & Charges
257,793
37,011
0
65,766
360,570
494,100
73.0%
Taxes
793,153
758,418
0
190,516
1,742,087
1,941,700
89.7%
Interfund Payments
865,300
585,396
0
477,000
1,927,696
1,924,000
100.2%
Sub -Total Utility Engineering
2,447,731
1,682,279
0
1,142,111
5,272,121
5,664,800
93.1%
Utility Administration
93,298
100,343
0
101,486
295,127
314,800
93.8%
Transfer to Constr Fund
1,392,000
0
0
208,000
1,600,000
1,600,000
100.0%
Transfer to 215 for LTGO Debt
77,700
0
0
0
77,700
77,100
100.8%
Debt Service
3,090,764
1,957,693
0
577,667
5,626,124
5,602,100
100.4%
Other Debt Service Costs
1,152
532
0
89
1,773
238,000
0.7%
Total Utility Systems
1,102,645
3,740,847
0
2,029,353
12,872,845
13,496,800
95.4°!0
Utility Maintenance:
Salaries & Benefits
1,309,283
330,808
0
349,405
1,989,496
2,209,600
90.0%
Supplies
383,286
24,668
0
24,557
432,511
481,500
89.8%
Other Svc & Charges
727,750
167,800
0
185,476
1,081,026
1,239,100
87.2%
METRO
0
0
7,924,164
0
7,924,164
7,894,300
100.4%
Capital Outlay
15,461
0
0,
0
15,461
38,200
40.5%
Interfund Payments
181,338
47,332
0
109,961
338,631
398,700
84.9%
Sub -Total Utility Maintenance
2,617,118
570,608
7,924,164
669,399
11,781,289
12,261,400
96.1%
Inventory Purchased
241,984
0
0
13,116
255,100
181,000
140.9%
Total Utility Maintenance
2,859,102
570,608
7,924,164
682,515
12,036,389
12,442,400
96.7%
Finance Bad Debt Expense
0
0
0
0
0
0
NIA
TOTAL EXPENSES
9,961,747
4,311;455
7.924,164
2,711,868
24,909,234
25,939,200
96.0°!0
Income (Loss)
(203.786)
277,161
(585.384)
926,590
414,582
:342.854)
-120.9%
Beginning Fund Balance
3,576,367
1,528,093
248,610)
1,272,278
6,128,128
6,128,128
100.0%
Excess Reserves
0
0
0
0
0
0
NIA
Transfer to 421
92.000'
0
0
:8.000)
100.J00)
010.J00}
N/A
Operating Reserve
374,866
127,628
150,000
138,855
791,349
1,343,632
58.9%
Bond Reserve (Fund 451)
1,730,197
731,857
0
199,499
2,661,553
2,661,553
100.0%
Unreserved Endinq Fund Balance
1.359,518
945,769
;983.994)
1,868,514
3,189,808
1,880,089
169.7%
cc: Mayor Tanner
Victoria Runkle
Nenita Ching Page 34
FUND 401 - WATERWORKS UTILITY OPERATING FUND
Draft Year to Date Through December 31, 2002
Water
Wastewater
METRO
Surface Water
Total
Calculation of Interest:
Begin Fund Balance
3,576,367
1,528,093
(248.610)
1,272,278
6,128,128
Revenues w/o Interest
8,397,387
3,968,487
7,338,780
3,212,220
22,916,874
Expenditures
9,961,747
4,311,455
7,924,164
2,711,868
24,909,234
End Fund Balance
2,012,007
1,185,125
'833.994;
1,772,630
4,135,768
Average Balance
2,794,187
1,356,609
541.3021
1,522,454
5,131,948
% of Total
54.447%
26.435%
-10.548%
29.666%
1
Allocated Interest
46,114
22,389
8.933'.
25,126
84,696
(%' Interest)
84,696
Page 35
CITY OF RENTON
FUND 401 - WATERWORKS UTILITY OPERATING FUND
AND FUND 451 WATERWORKS REVENUE BOND FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND FUND BALANCE
Year to Date Through December 31, 2001
FINAL
ACTUALS Total %
Utility Water Wastewater METRO Surface Water T otali Budget Bdgt
Adjusted Beg Fund Balance 6,477,274 2,129,575 0 766,287 9,373,136 9,373,136 100.0%
REVENUES:
Licenses & Permits
0
36,090
0
350
36,440
22,600
161.2%
Rate Revenue
7,634,795
3,552,352
6,536,744
2,632,606
20,356,497
20,657,455
98.5%
Inspection/Approval Fees
64,967
51,539
0
156,453
272,959
315,000
86.7%
Interfund Revenues
309,867
217,134
0
367,282
894,283
781,776
114.4%
Investment Interest
173,802
58,934
0
35,242
267,977
215,000
124.6%
Bryn Mawr Payment
37,874
0
0
0
37,874
37,874
100.0%
WSDOT Reimb/1-405 Retentn Pond
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A.
Misc Revenues
69,137
0
0
0
69,137
83,250
83.0%
Water Installation Fees
215,317
0
0
0
215,317
135,000
159.5%
Other Financing Sources
0
15,000
0
15,000
30,000
30,000
100.0%
TOTAL REVENUES
8,505,759
1931,049
6,536,744
3,206,933
22,180,484
22,277,955
99.61/6
EXPENSES:
Utility Engineering:
Salaries & Benefits
507,202
289,311
0
407,174
1,203,687
1,253,802
96.0%
Other Svc & Charges
256,664
23,435
0
53,355
333,454
433,070
77.0%
Taxes
817,957
722,828
0
192,113
1,732,898
1,828,806
94.8%
Interfund Payments
863,752
585,260
0
482,740
1,931,752
1,916,203
100.8%
Sub -Total Utility Engineering
2,445,575
1,620,834
0
1,135,382
5,201,791
5,431,881
95.8%
Utility Administration
94,809
94,809
0
89,231
278,849
301,309
92.5%
Transfer to Constr Fund
4,023,158
826,378
0
587,164
5,436,700
5,436,700
100.0%
Transfer to 215 for LTGO Debt
77,650
0
0
0
77,650
77,650
100.0%
Debt Service
1,968,283
1,397,361
0
241,002
3,606,646
4,084,111
88.3%
Other Debt Service Costs
8,013
3,698
0
616
12,327
23,000
53.6%
Total Utility Systems
8,617,488
3,943,080
0
2,053,395
14,613,963
15,354,651
95.2%
Utility Maintenance:
Salaries & Benefits
1,260,918
332,728
0
317,417
1,911,063
2,114,793
90.4%,
Supplies
349,777
38,927
0
25,247
413,951
520,118
79.6%
Other Svc & Charges
740,711
164,853
0
192,365
1,097,929
1,222,601
89.8%
METRO
0
0
6,785,354
0
6.785,354
6,661,800
101.9%
Capital Outlay
36,922
0
0
0
36,922
35,200
104.9%
Interfund Payments
196,160
52,943
0
100,272
349,375
371,350
94.1%
Sub -Total Utility Maintenance
2,584,488
589,451
6,785,354
635,301
10,594,594
10,925,862
97.0%
Inventory Purchased
204,507
0
0
12,246
216,753
178,926
121.1%
Total Utility Maintenance
2,788,995
589,451
6,785,354
647,547
10,811,347
11,104,788
97.4%
Finance Bad Debt Expense
182
0
0
0
182
0
N/A
TOTAL EXPENSES
11,406,665
4,532,531
6,785,354
2,700,942
25,425,492
26,459,439
96.1%
Income (Loss)
(.2.900,906'I
601,482)
!248.610)
505,991
3.245,Ci08!
4.1:8i.184)
77.6%
Adjusted Beg Fund Balance
6,477,274
2,129,575
0
766,287
9,373,136
9,373,136
100.0%
Excess Reserves
1,967,726
908,182
0
151,364
3,027,272
3,027,272
N/A
Transferto421
1,967,726
908,182
0
151,364
3,027,272
3,027,272
N/A
Operating Reserve
367,781
126,877
150,000
134,453
779,111
1,208,786
64.5%
Bond Reserve (Fund 451)
1,730,197
731,857
0
199,499
2,661,553
2,661,553
100.0%
Unreserved Ending Fund Balance
1,478,390
669,359
(398,510)
938,326
2,687,464
1,321,313
203.4%
cc: Mayor Tanner
Victoria Runkle
Nenita Ching
H:\finplankmayorskfundskc-401_2002.As DecO1 Page 36 1/13/2003
FUND 401 - WATERWORKS UTILITY OPERATING FUND
Year to Date Through December 31, 2001
Water
Wastewater
METRO
Surface Water
Total
Calculation of Interest:
Begin Fund Balance
6,477,274
2,129,575
0
766,287
9,373,136
Revenues w/o Interest
8,331,957
3,872,115
6,536,744
3,171,691
21,912,507
Expenditures
11,406,665
4,532,531
6,785,354
2,700,942
25,425,492
End Fund Balance
3,402,566
1,469,159
(248.6';C;•
1,237,036
5,860,151
Average Balance
4,939,920
1,799,367
124.305',
1,001,662
7,616,644
% of Total
64.857%
23.624%
-1.632%
13.151 %
1
Allocated Interest
173,802
63,307
4.373)
35,242
267.977 .
(%' Interest)
267,977
H:\finplan\mayors\funds\c_401 2002.xis Dec01 Page 37 'i13/2003
Waterworks Utility Construction Fund 421
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
Allocated Adj. Budget Proj. Mgr. Spending Plan --Actual Expenditures Cum. Under/(Over) Plan'
2,400,000
2,000,000
1,600,000
ell
1,200,000
800,000
400,000
0
--
Item Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
484,237 738,916 804,134
880,661
1,104,570
973,544
639,714
805,521
1,085,202
1,048,624
1,065,025
1,694,452 11,324,600
Proj. Mgr. Spending Plan
313,167 489,785 588,133
586,756
385,108
540,408
827,556
1,179,356
1,269,716
1,514,972
871,972
822,472 9,389,401
Actual Expenditures
219,973 336.115 612,601
322,712
493,501
507,772
465,240
413,970
628,952
2,118,026
507,532
1,547,917 8,174,313
Cum. Under/(Over) Plan*
93,194 246,865 222,396
486,440
378,047
410,683
772.999
1,538,385
2,179,149
1,576,094
1.940.534
1,215,088
Note: The Budget allocation Is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
C11111.07derl(Over)
Plan' based on Project Manager Spending Plan
H:\FINANCE\BUDGET,\Ma-/or's EUMxEXPENSE%2002\o.Waterworks Construction 421 2002.xls Page 38
1/13/2 003
Revenues:
Spec and Plan Charge
Investment Interest
Revenue Bond Proceeds
Residual Equity TO
Trnsf In - Springbrook Sprngs
LID/Dev Conti,
Water Connection Chrgs
Sewer Connection Chrgs
Spec Assess District -Water
Spec Assess District -Sewer
Surf Water Connection Chrgs
Other Contrib Cap/Water
PWTF Loan Maplewood Water
PWTF CT Pipeline
Reim from Transp for S 180
Reim from Parks for Maplewood
May Creek Basin Plan/Storm
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Debt Issuance Costs/Arbitrage
Water CIP
Wastewater CIP
Surface Water CIP
Total Expenditures
DRAFT FUND 421 WATERWORKS UTILITY CIP FUND • 2002 CASH FLOW
Jul-2002
Pln AGual Spend
(692.276) (69Z,216) (2/9.Z21) i,Ub1.94,1) (4V47Zi (1.208126) (75 ,660) (1,582.861) t1-5t,J'r1) (1956,117) t�ii.i,a.11 i.',177,/ 031) (24.,<
50
416
270
417
1.580
417
1,612
416
138
417
1,263
417
450
416,
0
30.000
0
30,000
0
0
0
U
0
U
0
0
0
J.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,216,446
5,40U,000
125.000
125,000
0
125,000
250,000
125,000
125,000
125.000
125,000
125.000
125,000
129,000
125,000
125,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100,000
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100.997
36,667
25,670
36,666
16,508
36.667
34,255
36,667
50,305
36,666
100,614
36.667
100.848
36,667
73,359
27,917
19,000
27,917
12,879
27,916
96,770
27,917
34,570
27,917
62,796
27.916
63,615
27.917
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,690
0
22,234
0
45,391
0
35,098
0
9,806
0
36,894
0
0
U
106,876
0
0
U
62,357
23,500
37.826
23,500
12,662
23,500
31,920
23,500
22,765
23,500
28,140
23,500
62,503
23.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
425,873
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
71,956
0
0
0
0
0
50,978
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
833,027
243,500
117.864
243,500
354,413
213.500
326,451
213,500
332,778
213,500
433,379
213,500
10.663.052
5,613.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,779
115,400
82,167
199,900
314,325
272,400
185,011
268.400
232,521
180.400
112,890
278,400
164,394
476.000
18,053
27,000
21,846
32,000
47,453
29,000
17,591
37.000
30,109
32.000
159.508
81,000
245.816
252,000
184,140
170.767
252.102
257.885
250.823
286,733
120,010
261,356
230,871
172,700
235,374
181,008
55,031
98.656
219,972
313,167
336.115
489,785
612,601
588,133
322,712
586,756
493,501
365,1U8
507,772
5'10,408
465.241
627,556
Ending Fund Balance (279.221) (961.943i (497.4-12) (1.208.228) (755,660) (1.582,8611 (751,921) (1,956.117) (912.644) (2.127.725) (987.037) (2,454,633) 9.210,774 2,331,311
Oct-2002 Nov-2002
Pin Actual Spend Pln
Beginning Fund Balance
9,210,774
2,331,311
8,799,062
1.365,455
8,426.768
309,239
6,568,800
(992.233)
7,445,838
(1,639,7U51
Revenues:
Spec and Plan Charge
1,659
417
350
417
1,900
4'16
0
417
50
417
Investment Interest
(9./-11)
0
19.943
0
28.887
0
17,360
11.000
2.176
11,000
Revenue Bond Proceeds
12 4.346)
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
Residual Equity Tsf
125.000
125.000
125.000
125,000
125,000
125,000
125.000
125.000
125,000
125,000
Trnsf In - Springbrook Sprngs
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LID/Dev Conti,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Water Connection Chrgs
28.952
36.666
24,022
36.667
4,420
36,667
127,939
36.666
8,370
36,667
Sewer Connection Chrgs
32.077
27,917
21.087
27,916
47,880
27,917
88,991
27,917
5.905
27,916
Spec Assess District -Water
0
0
1.100
0
245
0
0
0
0
0
Spec Assess District -Sewer
21.776
0
28,458
0
677
0
9,477
0
568
80.000
Surf Water Connection Chrgs
16,870
23,500
36,698
23,500
1.050
23,500
28,623
23,500
1.435
23,500
King County Consery Dist Grant
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45,978
0
PWTF Loan Maplewood Water
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
PWTF Loan CT Pipeline
0
0
0
0
0
0
522,180
0
0
0
Reim from Transp for S 180
0
0
0
0
50,000
0
65,000
0
0
0
Reim from Parks for Maplewood
0
0
0
0
0
0
400,000
0
0
0
May Creek Basin Plan/Storm
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
(50.910)
0
Total Revenues
2.257
213,500
256.658
213,500
260,058
213.500
1,384,570
224,500
138.504
304,500
Expenditures:
Debt Issuance Costs/Arbitrage
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Water CIP
170,823
722,900
136,882
737,900
969,127
745.900
84,275
253.400
1.144,035
518,500
Wastewater CIP
164,178
282,000
192.135
327,000
977.243
566,000
357,496
503.000
230.330
206.000
Surface Water CIP
78.968
174,456
299,935
204.816
171.657
201.072
65,761
115,572
173.553
97,971
. Total Expenditures
413,969
1,179,356
628,952
1.269,716
2.118.026
1.514,972
507,532
871,972
1,547,918
822.471
_------ - -Total-Total--
Actual
Spend Pln J
Budget
(892,271i)
(892,276)
(692,21b)
9,322
51000
5,000
58,635
82:000
82,000
10,002,100
5.400.000
5,400,000
1, 500, 000
1,500,000
1,500,000
100.000
0
0
0
0
0
622,900
440,000
440.000
558,929
335,000
335.000
32,269
0
0
295,021
80,000
80,000
342,849
262,000
282,000
45,978
0
0
425,873
0
0
522.180
0
0
115,000
0
0
471,956
0
0
01
0
0
15.103,011
8,124,000
8,124,000
0
(3
143.800
3.594,229
IJ90.400
5,380.820
2,46i3Oo8
2,376,000
2,805,000
2.118.225
2.223,000
2,994,980
3.174, 31'I
9.389.400
11,324,600
Endiny Fund Balar:,.e 8,799,062 1,365,455 13,426,768 309.239 6,568,800 (992.233) 7,445.838 (1.039,705) 6,036.424 (2,157 b76)
H.\Finance\f inplan\mayors\funds
CC Mayor Tanner Victoria Runkle Nenita Ching
6.036,424 (2, 157.ti lbjl (zl 0Ow ii7bl
Page 39 1;13,2003
Solid Waste Utility Fund 403
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
578,484
876,872
819,003
786.591
766,607
781,926
792,456
800,605
764,308
806,699
802,402
794,348
9,370,300
Actual Expenditures
721,725
701,176
693,191
681,717
763,752
684,444
695,877
728,046
667,718
738,725
681,636
666,633
8,424,641
Cum. Resources -Act Exp
(2632)
29,995
166,502
94,999
159,770
274,251
128,303
198,248
205,268
181,131
221,529
Actual Revenue
719,093
627,583
799,411
818,224
692,249
749,215
810,358
582,098
737,663
745,745
657,500
707,031
8,646,169
iVote: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
HAFINANGRBUDGE"Mayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\p.Solid Waste 4032002.xIs Page 40 1/13/2003
CITY OF RENTON
FUND 403 - SOLID WASTE UTILITY FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND FUND BALANCE
Draft Year to Date Through December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001
item
Beginning Fund Balance
REVENUES:
Solid Waste Fees
Investment Interest
Franchise Fees
Miscellaneous
DOE Coordinated Prev Grant
DOE 26/39 Grant
KC Optional Business Grant
KC Optional Special Grant
KC/W R/R. Grant
Loc Haz Wst/SEA-KC Hth
Interfund Revenues
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENSES:
Salaries
Personnel Benefits
Supplies
Garbage Contractor
Solid Waste Programs
Postage/Tel ephone/Other
Travel/Training
Equipment Rental
Public Util Sv/Dump Fees
Repairs & Maintenance
Miscellaneous
Local Haz Waste Mgt Program Fee
State Excise Tax
State Refuse Collection Tax
Interfund Taxes
Capital Outlay
Interfund Payments
TOTAL EXPENSES
Income (Loss)
Ending Fund Balance
cc: Mayor Tanner
Victoria Runkle
Nenita Ching
Linda Knight
2002 2002 %
Actual Adj Bdgt Bgt
388,190 388,190 100.0%
8,445,473
9,120,500
92.6%
3,549
12,000
29.6%
60,500
66,000
91.7%
0
0
N/A
51,451
59,300
86.8%
0
0
NIA
20,958
81,800
25.6%
0
0
N/A
22,635
5,000
452.7%
35,930
24,700
145.5%
5,674
1,000
567.4%
8,646,170
9,370,300
92.3%
132,340
149,100
88.8%
31,235
30,000
104.1%
1,464
11,000
13.3%
6,798,875
7,631,300
89.1%
77,084
182,300
42.3%
53
2,100
2.5%
133
2,200
6.0%
14,000
13,900
100.7%
2,194
6,600
33.2%
0
600
0.0%
4,300
7,900
54.4%
182,490
186,800
97.7%
121,656
116,700
104.2%
291,974
280,000
104.3%
496,102
483,700
102.6%
0
0
N/A
270,740
266,100
101.7%
8,424,640
9,370,300
89.9%
221,530 0 N/A
609,720 388,190 157.1%
K Ctv Haz Waste Assmt Budget:
Jan 46.700
April 46,700
July 46,700
Oct 46,700
2001 2001 %
Actual . Adj Bdgt Bgt
666,951 666,951 100.0%
8,334,675
8,642,450
96.4%
23,193
16,000
145.0%
60,500
0
N/A
0
0
N/A
13,205
46,000
28.7%
0
0
N/A
21,878
6,000
364.6%
4,500
10,000
45.0%
0
49,000
0.0%
32,931
22,000
149.7%
4,838
1,040
465.2%
8,495,721
8,792,490
96.64/0
123,422
141,364
87.3%
28,651
33,875
84.6%
4,076
10,883
37.5%
7,139,787
7,751,278
92.1%
123,314
170,721
72.2%
63
2,131
2.9%
155
2,252
6.9%
11,800
13,852
85.2%
2,198
6,427
34.2%
0
568
0.0%
3,156
7,903
39.9%
190,670
260,796
73.1 %
118,102
116,685
101.20"
283,445
280,043
101.2%
486,291
466,739
104.2 %
0
0
N/A
260,933
260,933
100.0%
8.776,063
9,526,450
92.10'
(280,342) (733,960) 38.2%
386,609 (67,009) 577.0%
H:\finplan\mayors\funds\e_403_2002.As Dec02 Page 41 1/13/2003
CITY OF RENTON
FUNDS 501 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND FUND BALANCE
Draft Year to Date Through December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001
Beginning Fund Balance
REVENUES:
Maintenance & Operation:
Real & Personal Property Taxes
Vehicle/Equipment Repair Chgs
Veh/Equipment Maint & Oper
Investment Interest
Sale of General Fixed Assets
Miscellaneous Charges
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
EXPENSES:
Maintenance & Operation:
Salary & Benefits
Supplies
Other Svc & Charges
Interfund Payments for Sery
Total Maintenance
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Fund 501 - Operations
2002 Actual 2002 Budget % Bgt
3,090,831 3,090,831 100.0%
0
0
N/A
26,887
30,000
89.6%
1,357,629
1,484,700
91.4%
66,264
50,000
132.5%
59,360
50,000
118.7%
0
0
N/A
1,510,140
1,614,700
93.5%
530,191
556,700
95.2%
543,609
738,700
73.6%
286,371
301,000
95.1%
228,600
228,600
100.0%
1,588,771
1,825,000
87.1%
1,588,771
1,825,000
8 7. 1 T.
Income (Loss) fm Operations (78,531) (210.300) 37.4%
NON -OPERATING REVENUE (EXPENSE):
Veh/Equipment Cap Recovery 1,605,396 1,746,300 91.9%
EquityTsf fm LID Guaranty Fund 0 0 NIA
Interfund Loan to 306
Debt Service
Capital Acquisitions
TOTAL NON -OPERATING
Total Net Income (Loss)
Ending Fund Balance
Total Revenue
Total Expense
Net Income (Loss).
cc: Mayor Tanner
Victoria Runkle
David Hohn
File
0 0 N/A
0 0 N/A
(+ 172. 1561 1210 00j 96.8%
433„240 535,800 80.9%
354,609 325,500 108.9%
3,445,440 3,416,331 100.9%
3,115,536 3,361,000 92.7%
2,760,927 3,035,500 91.0%
354,609 325,500
Fund 501 - Operations
2001 Actual 2001 Adj Bdgt % Bgt
2,287,486 2,287,486 100.0%
0
0
N/A
29,598
30,000
98.7%
1,583,625
1,634,700
96.9%
264,970
38.000
697.3%
86,727
20,000
433.6%
876
0
N/A
1,965,796
1,722,700
114.1 %
494,038
557,300
88.6%
576,008
731,400
78.8%
272,126
284,400
95.7%
227,232
224,200
101.4%
1,569,404
1,797,300
87.3%
1,569,404
1,797,300
87.3%
396,392 (74,600)-531.4%
1,461,354
1,453,200
100.6%
0
0
N/A
0
3f.C.° 00)
0.0%
0
0
N/A
1.203.0001
87.6%
406.953
(49;800)
-8172'�'�
803,345 (124.400)-6414-3%
3,090,831 2,163, 086 142.9%
3,427,150 3,175,900 107.9%
2,623,805 3,300,300 79.5%
803,345 ;'24.400)
H:1Financelfinplanlmayorslfunds\ f_501 2002.)ds Page 42 1/13/2003
Airport Fund 402
DRAFT - December 2002, Monthly Budget Tracking Chart
Department: Planning, Building, Public Works
0 Allocated Adj. Budget --4*- Actual Expenditures - -6 - Cum. Under/(Over)
140,000
105,000
70,000
35,000
0
(35,000)
(-/0'000)
Item
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Total
Allocated Adj. Budget
39,766
65,230
55,499
63.226
59,655
53,484
54,744
59,084
79,318
63,484
68,004
85,908 747,400
Actual Expenditures
32,766
59,468
74,934
121,230
43,526
46,211
34,038
42.910
46,164 •
53,501
47.575
75,920 678,244
Cum Under/(Over)
6,999
12,761
(b.66)
ilA6'18)
(48,519)
j'l I'mi)
(20,5 11)
(;1,397)
28.757
38,739
59,168
69,156
Note: The Budget allocation is based on an average of 1996 through 2001 actual monthly expenditures.
Amounts shown represent operating budget and actual amounts only, capital projects are excluded.
HAFINANCRIBLIDGE'RIMayor's EOM\EXPENSE\2002\q.Airport 402 2002.xls Page 43 1/13/2003
6
FIRE MITIGATION ANALYSIS
Fund
Beginning Fund Balance
Revenues
Interest,
Expenditures
Ending Fund Balance
Revenue Aging
f7T:7:� a i> •► :►_
Beginning Fund Balance
Revenues
Interest
Expenditures
Ending Fund Balance
Revenue Aging
MITIGATION ANALYSIS
01116/200310:46
Im
9997
.1m
2000
2m
2=
105
105
105
304
304
304
304
4,189,215.00
4,374,200.31
2,725,533.00
2,916,766.28
2,947,659.28
2,471,291.29
988,698.59
818,043.29
495,961.93
758,531.38
595,117.41
805,358.72
405,849.41
4,397,703.29
272,986.00
216,292.17
163,664.83
124,997.14
155,098.66
66,747.23
30,973.83
906,043.98
2,360,921.41
730,962.93
689,221.55
1,436,825.37
1,955,189.34
694,316.00
4,374,200.31
2,725,533.00
2,916,766.28
2,947,659.28
2,471,291.29
988,698.59
4,723,059.71
294,382.59
4,428,677.12
105
105
105
303
303
303
303
151,086.00
,286,560.70
558,183.40
569,732.40
428,895.29
801,589.17
1,195,575.40
121,826.70
246,610.00
170,626.00
223,648.00
367,546.51
362,342.54
383,784.31
13,648.00.
' 25,012.70
34,390.00
31,421.87
27,563.54
35,881.38
41,699.20
-
-
193,467.00
395,906.98
22,416.17
4,237.69
59,550.00
286,560.70
:558,183.40
569,732.40
428,895.29
801,589.17
1,195,575.40
1,561,508.91
87,621.56
255,069.87
395,110.05
398,223.92
425,483.51
TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION ANALYSIS
Fund .105
Beginning Fund Balance 21876,358.00
Revenues 819,179.86
Interest 155,064.00
Expenditures 1,468,202.13
Ending Fund Balance 2,382,399.73
Revenue Aging
105
105
305
305
305
2,382,399.73
3,280,560.91
2,830,099.28
4,430,258.58
4,470,569.08
1,648,560.00
2,948,124.30
1,622,747.73
775,180.44
365,038.01
190,858.18
163,807.26
160,786.57
271,490.06
235,118.24
941,257.00
3,562,393.19
183,375.00
1,006,360.00
941,509.00
3,280,660.91
2,830,099.28
4,430,258.58
4,470,569.08
4,129,216.33
1, 282, 389.58
1, 046, 670.50
600,156.25
.. ,
Seginning FU: -h ance
Fund 105- . -
7,216,659.,00...:.7.043,160.7.4........6,56.4,277.31.
• :: 105
105
30313041305
6,316,597.96
'Reven'Ues''
1,759,049.85
2,391,131.93
3,877,281.68
2,441,513.14
Interest
441,698.00
432,163.05
361,862.09
317,205.58
,Expenditures, , :.. ,
2,374,246.11
3;102,,178.41
4,486,823.12
1,268,503.53
303.1304 /305
7,806,813.15
1,948,085.67
454,152.26
2,465,601.54
30313041305
7,743,449.54
1,133,229.96
337,746.85
2,900,936.03
305
4,129,216.33
1,001,645.20
90,534.05
1,200,000.00
1; 092,179.25
30313041305
6.,313,490.32
5,783,132.80
163,207.08
1,953,866.00
City-9PRenton
gadget & CIP vs Actual
December, 2002
Fund Annual Budget and OF
301
CONSTRUCTION COSTS/DOWNTOWN PKG GARAGE 0.00
DESIGN COSTS/DOWNTOWN PKG GARAGE 0.00
DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE 9,540,400.00
RETIREMENT/PERS 0.00
TRAVEL 0.00
304
DEBT ISSUE COSTS/2002 LTGO FIRE ST 12
STATION 12 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION
STATION 15
9,540,400.00
Year to Date YTD_S Variance YTD % Varia
3,755,065.09
-3,755,065.09
-100.00/0
402,511.02
402,511.02
-100.0%
5,867.38
9,534,532.62
0.1%
641.09
-641.09
-100.0%
422.27
422.27
-100.0%
4,164,506.85
5,375,893.15
43.65%
0.00
73,487.39
-73,487.39
-100.0%
500,000.00
333,341.13
166,658.87
66.7%
0.00
-195.23
195.23
.-100.0%
500,000.00
406,633.29
93,366.71
81.33%
316
ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHT POLE REPL
243,667.00
243,624.91
42.09
100.0%
CEDAR RIVER TRAIL EXTENSION
95,806.00
15,080.98
84,725.02
15.1%
CITY FACILITIES REPAVING
70,000.00
11,378.58
58,621.42
16.3%
CITY NEIGHBORHOOD BEAUTIFICATION
30,000.00
322.00
29,678.00 :
... - , -: - L 1 %
COMM SVCS GRNT MATCHING FNDS
200,000.00
.0.00
200,000.00 - .....
00%
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
59,142.00
33,950.78
25,191.22,
57.4%
CONFERENCING CENTER
197,589.00_..
195,8910.
1,697.11. ,.
99.1%
CONSULTING
313,500.00
221,993.11,.
_ :::;.:91,506.89
70.8%
COPIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
75,000.00
3,20024
; 71,799.76
4.3%
FIRE STATION IMPROVEMENTS
0.00
28,167.87 -., :
; .:.:-28,16T87
-100.0%
HARDWARE
0.00
3,540.61:.-
..:._ .--3,540.61
-100.0%
HIGHLAND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
115,000.00
.0.00
115,900.00 - =
0.0.%
HIGHLANDS REDEVELOPMENT
1,500,000.00
0.00.
1,500,000.0-0...
: . : . . :.... 0.0%
KENNYDALE BEACH RESTORATION,
110,000.00
15,17.9.21..
,. 94,820.79.. ,.
MAIN & GRADY BLDG IMPROVEMENTS
0.00
50,879.79
-50,879.79 -:
-...: - ::. > 100.0%-
MAIN & GRADY MAJOR MAINT
110,637.00
12,054.42..-
-._- _ :' 98,582:58: -'. -,°:: _ + ---> 10:9%:
MAIN LIBRARY MAJOR MTC
0.00
2,075,.53., f
; ..::':, --2,Q75:53, ;:r j
_ ; .: ; :=100.0"/o
MAJOR MAINTENACNE/PUBLICFACILITIES
385,000.00
243,368.21. =
:.....141,631.79...-....
63.2%.
Page 1 of 2
01/16/2
H:IFINANCEkGrants\Reports\Bud vs_Actual vs_C
Fund ,;. s
Annual Budget and CIP Year to Date
YTD S Variance
YTD%Varian
r
MAJOR MAINTENANCEIOPERATIONAL FAC
100,000.00
59,877.71
40,122.29
59.9%
MAJOR MAINTENANCE/PARKS MAINTENANCE
260,000.00
60,647.35
199,352.6:
23.3%
MAJOR MTC IMPRVMTS-CARCO THTRE
12,634.00
0.00
12,634.00
0.0%
MINOR HARDWARE
397,500.00
231,799.95
165,700.05
58.3%
MINORNETWORK
163,000.00
49,047.36
113,952.64
30.1%
MINOR PRINTERS
20,000.00
3,197.44
16,802.56
16.0%
MUSEUM MAJOR MAINT
0.00
2,217.08.
-2,217.08
-100.0%
NEIGHBORHOOD GRANT PROGRAM
90,000.00
39,213.33
50,786.67
43.6%
NETWORK
0.00
50,323.39
-50,323.39
-100.0%
NEW CITY HALL RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
36,594.00
-15,000.00
51,594.00
41.0%
NEW SHOP FACILITIES
40,000.00
6,703.38
33,296.62
16.8%
NO HILNDS GYM/CARPET REPLCMENT
40,000.00
36,577.45
3,422.55
91.4%
OPPORTUNITY FUNDS
0.00
272.00
-272.00
-100.0%
OTHER RENTALS
0.00
92,580.14
-92,580.14
-100.0%
PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT
378,880..00
138,874.03
240,005.97
36.7%
PAVILION PROJECT
2,300,000.00
39,932.66
2,260,067.34
1.7%
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
250,000.00
250,000.00
0.00
. 100.0%
PORT QUENDALL
0.00
16,142.43
-16,142.43
-100.0%
PRINTERS
0.00
11,243.38
-11,243.38
-100.0%
REMOVAL OF SWIMMING POOL-
0.00
4,081.31: -. , .
4,081.31'
-100.0%
RENTON VISIONING
200,000.00 -
-. 59,745.25
140,254.75 -
29.9%
SENIOR CENTER/RCC AUDIO EQUIPMENT
0.00
2,529.537 --
-2,529.53
-100.0%-*
SKATE BOARD PARK
50,000.00
5,860.45.:..:..
: 44,139.55
11.7%
SOFTWARE
431,000.00
110,996.98
320,003.02
25.8%
STORAGE .BUILDINGS
430,000.00
265,541.47
164,458:53.
61.8%
TRANSIT CENTER ESPRESSO STAND
18,000.00
.:0.00
18,000.00
0.0%
TRF-OUT 000 TO 316/FUND BAL -
175,000.00
175,000300 _. ;
0;00 = . _
- • 100.0%
VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
300,000.00
250,595 00 --.' - :-
.; ::49-,405'.00.- ,:"' - --.r..
VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK
414,000.00
I:19..*%:.:";
.., 413;880,32 .- '.. `
0.0%
j.
9,615,949.00
3,028,826.88
6,587,122.12
31-.50%
Grand Totals.,-
34
19,656,9.00
7,599,967402 '--�:,,:129056,381.98
38.66%
Page-2 of 2
01/16/21
H:\MANCE\Grants\Rcports\Bud-vs-ActuaI vs_C
City of Renton
Summary Investment Report - By Type
December H, 2002
Investment Type
Book Cost
Certificate of Deposit
(30 detail records)
$24,000,000.00
Federal Home Loan Bank
(8 detail records)
$8.,158,437.50 .
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(13 detail records)
$7,995,875.00
Federal National Mortgage Assn
(9 detail records)
$7,315,504.69
Man icipal In vestor A cco unt (MIA)
(9 detail records)
$15,004,764.50
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(36 detail records)
$11,5071683.32
Snohomish County Housing Authority
(I detail record)
$98,272.00
State and Local Gov't Securities (SLGS)
(I detail record)
$444,870.00
US Treasury Strips
(26 detail records)
$3.,727,456.19
Zero Coupon Treasury Bonds
(3 detail records) $499,042.41
Grand Tota( $78,751,905.61
Date Printed. Friday, January 17, 2003
Page I of I
City of Renton
Summary Investment Report - By Fund
December 31, 2002
Fund Investment Type Book Cost
000 General Fund
Certificate of Deposit (I detail record) $1,000,000.00
Federal Home Loan Bank (1 detail record) $2,000,000.00
101 Park Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
102 Arterial Streets Fund
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
103 Streets Fund
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
106 Library Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
110 HoteUMotel Tax Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
125 One Percent for Arts Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
127 Cable Comm Dev Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
201 1997 LTGO - City Hall Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
2071978 LTGO - Sr Center Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
2121989 LTGO Refunding - Shop Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
2131983 ULTGO Refunding - Park Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
215 Gen Gov't Misc Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State and Local Gov't Securities (SLGS)
2191989 ULTGO - Sr Housing Debt Service
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
Friday, January 17, 2003
(I detail record) $750,000:00
(I detail record) $250,000.00
(1 detail record) $0.00
(1 detail record) $100,000:0Q- -
(1 detail record) $0.00 . .
(I detail record) $250,000.00
.(I detail record) $400,000.00
(I detail record) $0.00
(I detail record) $195,000.00.
(I detail record)
$80,000;00..: _ 1'... ;._
(1 detail record)
$100,000.00::::. ::::::. : ...
(1 detail record)
(I detail record)
$Q.00:... -. -, .
(1 detail record)
$20,000..00 -::: .:-.• .:-.: •: •..:
(1 detail record)
MQ0_7-ni 7 7- ' -;
(I detail record)
$0.00 ......... . . .. . .
(1 detail record)
$225,000.0.0:,: E:,.E:.:<
(1 detail record)
$444,870.;QU:
(I detail record)
$509,0WQk—:•,'.----;_ A,,:
Fund Investment Type
Book Cosy
220 LID Debt Service Fund
,
Certificate of Deposit
(2 detail records)
$200,000.00 '
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$225,000.00
221 LID Guaranty Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$0.00
301 City Hall Capital Improvement Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(I detail record)
$4,000,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$200,000.00
302 Open Space Capital Improvement Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$0.00
303 Community Dev Impact Mitigation Fund
Federal Home Loan Bank
(1 detail record)
$500,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$500,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$443,050.02
304 Fire Impact Mitigation Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(3 detail records)
$1,700,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$175,000.00
Federal National Mortgage Assn
(I detail record)
$SOO,000.00
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
(I detail record)
$1,000,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$1,100,000.00
305 Transportation Impact Mitigation Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(2 detail records)
$1,000,000.00
Federal Home Loan Bank
(1 detail record)
$500,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$721,875.00
federal National Mortgage Assn
(1 detail record)
$500,000
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$785,330.74..:_
306 Leased Properties Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$0:00 ... .. _..
307Aquatics Center
Certificate of Deposit
(1 detail record)
$1,000,000:00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$1,000,000.00 -... .
Federal National Mortgage Assn
(2 detail records)
$2,316,754:69 :
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$100,000.00
Friday, January 17, 2003 Page 2 p
Fund Investment Type
Book Cost
316 Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(3 detail records)
$2,250,000.00
Federal Home Loan Bank
(1 detail record)
$1,000,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(1 detail record)
$1,000,000.00
Federal National Mortgage Assn
(I detail record)
$500,000.00
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
(1 detail record)
$1,000,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$0.00
317 Capital Improvement Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(4 detail records)
$3,500,000.00
Federal Home Loan Bank
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
320 LID Construction Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
401 Waterworks Utility Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Federal National Mortgage Assn
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
402 Airport Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Federal National Mortgage Assn
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
403 Solid Waste Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
404 Golf Course Fund
Certificate of Deposit
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
421 Water & Sewer Construction Fund
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
(1 detail record)
(I detail record)
(1 detail record)
(I detail record)
(2 detail records)
(1 detail record)
(I detail record)
(2 detail records)
(I detail record)
(I detail record)
(I detail record)
$993,437.50
$1,000,000.00
$1,100,000.00
$0.00
$250,000.00
$1,501,250.00
$1,000,000.00
$850,000.00
$500,000.00
$1,000,000.00:, .
$1,000,000.00,
$575,000.00.._...:
(I detail record)
$150,000.00::
(1 detail record)
$240,00.0:00:.
(I detail record)
$250,000.00.
(1 detail record)
$500,000.00 ...
(I detail record)
$425,000.00
(3 detail records)
$3,165,000.00 -± ..-.
(I detail record)
$2,000,000.00
(I detail record)
$1,000,00.0.00: �:,,,: ......
(1 detail record)
$0:00:::
Friday, January 17, 2003
Page 3 of 4
Fund Investment Type
Book Cost
424 Golf Course Construction Fund
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$200,000.00 '
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$0.00
451 Water & Sewer Debt Service Fund
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
(I detail record)
$2,000,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$530,000.00
501 Equipment Rental Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(3 detail records)
$2,350,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$300,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(I detail record)
$588,000.00
502 Insurance Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(2 detail records)
$2,000,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
(I detail record)
$999,000.00
Federal National Mortgage Assn
(1 detail record)
$997,500.00
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
(1 detail record)
$2,000,000.00
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$1,175,000.00
601 Firemen's Pension Fund
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
(1 detail record)
$749,767.46
Snohomish County Housing Authority
(1 detail record)
$98,272.00
US Treasury Strips
(26 detail records)
$3,72.7,456.19
Zero Coupon Treasury Bonds
(3 detail records)
$499,042.41 '
901 Surplus Bank Balance Fund
Certificate of Deposit (I detail record) $3,000,000.00
Municipal Investor Account (MIA) (I detail record) $5,004,76C50.-,=,..:
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) . (1 detail record) $9.22,535.10.. i.,
Grand Total $78,751,905.61
Friday, January 17, 2003 Page 4 of4-
City of Renton
Detail Investment Report - By Fund
December 31, 2002
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
000
General Fund
4358
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
5.2500%
5/16/2003
$1,000,000.00
4365
Federal Home Loan Bank Vining Sparks
4.1300%
7/9/2004
$2,000,000.00
Summary for 'Fund Number = 000 (2 detail records)
Fund Total
$3,000,000.00
101
Park Fund
4352
Certificate of Deposit 1 st Savings Bank of Renton
5.8500%
3/7/2003
$750.000.00
4384
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. CIBC
2.3750%
12/13/2004
$250,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 101(3 detail records)
Fund Total
$1,000,000.00
102
Arterial Streets Fund
4384
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. CIBC
2.3750%
12/13/2004
$100,000.00
3920
.:Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
• f ' i
Summary for'Fund Number = 102 (2 detail records)
Fund Total
$100,000.00
Streets Fund
'4384' ' '°
'°Federal^Home'Lmm,Mortgage Corp. CIBC
2.3750%
12/13/2004
$250,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement.(LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$400,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 103 (2 detail records)
Fund Total
$650,000.00
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
106
Library Fund
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525% 1/1/2011
$0.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 106 (1 detail record)
Fund Total
$0.00
110
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525% 1/1/2011
$195,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 110 (1 detail record)
Fund Total
$195,000.00
125
One Percent for Arts Fund
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525% 1/1/2011
$80,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 125 (1 detail record)
Fund Total
$80,000.00
127 .
Cable Comm Dev Fund
4352
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
5,8500%
3/7/2003
$100,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$70,000.00
_...........:_.._..•..•...._._....-- ................ ....... ... ... ......:..........
..._Summaryfor.'FundNumber.=,.12.7, (2..detail records)
Fund Total
201
19:97 LTC0.7 City Hall Debt Service
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
Summary for'F, and Number = 201 (1 detail record)
'
Fund Total
$0.00
�,_._ D-2_:..4. V4.4 .. r,....,,:w, 77 ?nna
Page 2 of 11
Fund \ Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
207
1978 LTGO - Sr Center Debt Service
3920
212
1989 LTGO Refunding - Shop Debt Service
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for Tund Number' = 207 (1 detail record)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for Turid Number' = 212 (1 detail record)
213
1983 ULTGO Refunding - Park Debt Service
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 213 (1 detail record)
215
Gen Gov.'t Misc Debt Service
4362 State and Local Gov't Securities (SLG US Bank
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 215 (2-detail records)
219
1989 ,UIt?'GO-,SnHoysing Debt Service
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 219 (1 detail record)
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
3.4500% 6/1/2004
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$444,870.00
$225,000.00
$669,870.00
$509,000.00
$509,000.00
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
226
LID Debt Service Fund
221
LID Guaranty Fund
4352
4352
3920
3920
301
City Hall Capital Improvement Fund
4358
3920
Certificate of Deposit 1 st Savings Bank of Renton
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 220 (3 detail records)
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 221 (1 detail record)
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for Fund Number' = 301 (2 detail records)
302
.•O.pen,.Space,.C.apital Improvement F.und..........
(• 1. 3920:• Repurdhas'eiAgteldnlent (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number = 302 (1 detail record)
Community Dev Impact Mitigation Fund
4384 Federal.Home1oan1Mortgage Corp. CIBC
4380 Federal Home Loan Bank Vining Sparks
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number = 303 (3 detail records)
Date Printed: Friday, January 17, 2003 ;
5,8500% 3/7/2003 $100,000.00
5.8500% 3/7/2003 $100,000.00
1.4525% 1/1/2011 $225,000.00
Fund Total $425,000.00
1.4525% 1/1/2011 $0.00
Fund Total $0.00
5.2500% 5/16/2003 $4,000,000.00
1,4525% 1/1/2011 $200,000.00
Fund Total $4,200,000.00
1.4525% 1/1/2011 $0.00
Fund Total $0.00
2.3750% 12/13/2004
3.1200% 7/29/2005
1.4525% 1/1/2011
Fund Total
$500,000.00
$500,000.00
$443,050.02
$1,443,050.02
Page 4 of 11
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
304 J
Fire Impact Mitigation Fund
4352
4360
4375
4384
4385
4030
3920
305
Transportation Impact Mitigation Fund
4352
4360
4384
4385
4380
3920
Certificate of Deposit
1 st Savings Bank of Renton
Certificate of Deposit
1 st Savings Bank of Renton
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
CIBC
Federal National Mortgage Assn
CIBC
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
US Bank
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
Summary for Fund Number' = 304 (7 detail records)
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
Certificate of Deposit 1st Savings Bank of Renton
Federal Home.Loan Mortgage Corp. CIBC
Federal National Mortgage Assn CIBC
Federal Home Loan Bank Vining Sparks
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for'Fund Number' = 305 (6 detail records)
:Leased„Pzoperti,es:.Fund,
t 3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
Summary for Fund Number' = 306 (1 detail record)
5.8500%
4.7000%
3.6000%
2.3750%
2.5000%
1.4000%
1.4525%
5.8500%
4.7000%
2.3750%
2.5000%
3.1200%
1.4525%
1.4525%
3/7/2003
8/22/2003
8/22/2004
12/13/2004
12/13/2004
1 /1 /2011
1/1/2011
Fund Total
3/7/2003
8/22/2003
12/13/2004
12/13/2004
7/29/2005
1 /112011
Fund Total
1 /1 /2011
Fund Total
$450,000.00
$250,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$175,000.00
$500.000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,100,000.00
$4,475,000.00
$500,000.00
$500,000.00
$721,875.00
$500,000.00
$500,000.00
$785,330.74
$3,507,205.74
$0.00
$0.00
. n..,.. A'1'-a. 79 -tAA9
4
Fund
Inv. No.
Investment Type
Investment Bank
Int. Rate
Maturity Date
Book Cost
30'7
Aquatics Center
4375
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
3.6000%
8/22/2004
$1,000,000.00
4383
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Seattle Northwest Securities
2.5500%
6/9/2005
$1,000,000.00
•
4386
Federal National Mortgage Assn
CIBC
2.6250%
6/27/2005
$1,000,000.00
4376
Federal National -Mortgage Assn
Vining Sparks
3.2500%
9/12/2005
$1,316,754.69
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$100,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 307 (5 detail records)
Fund Total
$4,416,754.69
316
Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$1,000,000.00
4327
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2.2500%
11/4/2003
$250,000.00
4375
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
3.6000%
8/22/2004
$1,000,000.00
4381
Federal Home Loan Bank
CIBC
2.2600%
11/8/2004
$1,000,000.00
4385
Federal National Mortgage Assn
CIBC
2.5000%
12/13/2004
$500,000.00
4383
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Seattle Northwest Securities
2.5500%
6/9/2005
$1,000,000.00
4030
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$1,000,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 316 (8
detail records)
Fund Total
$5,750,000.00
317
Capital Improvement Fund
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$1,000,000.00
4324
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2.3000%
9/29/2003
$2,000,000.00
4327
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2.2500%
11/4/2003
$250,000.00
4327
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2.2500%
11/4/2003
$250,000.00
4381
federal Home Loan Bank
CIBC
2.2600%
11/8/2004
$993,437.50
4030
Municipal.InvestCr'°Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$1,090,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$1,100,OOQ00
Summary for'FuiYd Number' = 317 (7
detail records)
Fund Total
$6,593,437.50
Date' P.rintn.'d: Fridav January' 17.2003 Page 6 of 11
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
320
LID Construction Fund
401
Waterworks Utility Fund
402
Airport Fund
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool 1.4525% 1/1/2011 $0.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 320 (1 detail record)
Fund Total $0.00
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$250,000.00
4385
Federal National Mortgage Assn
CIBC
2.5000%
12/13/2004
$501,250.00
4377
Federal National Mortgage Assn
Vining Sparks
2.56006/o
4/21/2005
$1,000,000.00
4030
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$1,000,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$850,000.00
Summary for'Furid Number = 401 (5 detail records)
Fund Total
$3,601,250.00
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$250,000.00
4327.
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2,2500%
11/4/2003
$250,000.00
4377
Federal National Mortgage Assn
Vining Sparks
2.5600%
4/21/2005
$1,000,000.00
4030
Municipal ln"vestor Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$1,000,000.00
3920. • .
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$575,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number = 402 (5 detail records)
Fund Total
$3,075,000.00
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$150,000.60
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$240,000.00
Summary for:'Fund Number' = 403 (2,detail records)
Fund Total
$390,000.00
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
404
Golf Course Fund
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$250,000.00
4387
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Vining Sparks
2.3300%
12/27/2004
$500,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$425.000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 404 (3 detail records)
Fund Total
$1,175,000.00
421
Water & Sewer Construction Fund
4382
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Seattle Northwest Securities
2.7500%
11/26/2004
$2,000,000.00
4379
Federal Home Loan Banks
US Bank
2.8700%
4/28/2005
$550,000.00
4378
Federal Home Loan Bank
Seattle Northwest Securities
3.0400%
7/28/2005
$1,615,000.00
4380
Federal Home Loan Bank
Vining Sparks
3.1200%
7/29/2005
$1,000,000.00
4030
Municipal Investor Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$1,000,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 421(6
detail records)
Fund Total
$6,165,000.00
424
Golf Course Construction Fund
4387
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Vining Sparks
2.3300%
12/27/2004
$200,000.00
3920•.: , .
- Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$0.00
`�ummary'%r'Furid Number' = 424 (2 detail records)
Fund Total
$200,000.00
451..
Water & Sewer Debt Service Fund;:
4030
Municipal Investor Account.(MIA). US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$2,000,000.00
3920
Repurchase A.gre4ement,(LGIP) State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$530,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 451(2 detail records)
Fund Total
$2,530,000.00
1)nfa Printndj, Fridnv. Jnnunry 17. 2003
: .,i E r: i; :.
Page 8 of I
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
501
-
Equipment Rental Fund
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$350,000.00
4321
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
2.7000%
9/1/2003
$1,000,000.00
4375
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
3.6000%
8/22/2004
$1,000,000.00
4387
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Vining Sparks
2.3300%
12/27/2004
$300,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$588,000.00
Summary for'Fund Number' = 501 (5 detail records)
Fund Total
$3,238,000.00
502
Insurance Fund
4360
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
4.7000%
8/22/2003
$1,000,000.00
4375
Certificate of Deposit
1st Savings Bank of Renton
3.6000%
8/22/2004
$1,000,000.00
4387
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Vining Sparks
2.3300%
12/27/2004
$999,000.00
4386
Federal National Mortgage Assn
CIBC
2.6250%
6/27/2005
$997,500.00
4030
Munidipal Investor Account (MIA)
US Bank
1.4000%
1/1/2011
$2,000,000.00
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%
1/1/2011
$1,175.000.00
Summary for'Fund Number = 502 (6
detail records)
Fund Total
$7,171,500.00
A
L
r,.»...,... 17 Anna
r \
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
r
601
Firemen's Pension Fund
4286
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.7860%
11/15/2003
$253,897.18
4287
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.8380%
11/15/2004
$58,239.28
4267
Zero Coupon Treasury Bonds
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.7710%
11/15/2004
$174,017.71
4288
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.8800%
11/152005
$57,955.91
4268
Zero Coupon Treasury Bonds
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.8400%
11/15/2005
$168,617.35
4289
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.9410%
11/15/2006
$62,681.21
4269
Zero Coupon Treasury Bonds
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.9260%
11/15/2006
$156,407.35
4290
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.9720%
11/15/2007
$222,410.35
4291
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
5.9860%
11/15/2007
$222,182.35
4292
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.0420%
11/15/2008
$222,699.31
4293
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.0630%
11/15/2009
$216.180.13
4156
Snohomish County Housing Authority
US Bank
8.6000%
5/1/2010
$98,272.00
4294
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1030%
11/15/2010
$161,821.08
3920
Repurchase Agreement (LGIP)
State Investment Pool
1.4525%.
1/1/2011
$749,767.46
4295.
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1130%
11/15/2011
$199,152.07
4296
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1330%
11/15/2012
$185,350.37
4297
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1660%
11 /15/2012
$4,031.35
4298
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1530%
11/15/2013
$179,263.23
4299
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1530%
11/15/2014
$169,433.65
4300
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1630%
11/15/2015
$159,195.25
4301
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1730%
11/15/2016
$148,602.85
4302
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1730%
11/15/2017
$138,357.75
4303
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1820%
11/15/2018
$139,422.35
4304
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.2360%
11/15/2018
$358,711.35
4305
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1820%
11/15/2019
$117,810.97
4306
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1920%
11/15/2020
$107,903.65
4307
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1920%
11/15/2021
$98,513.10
4308
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1810%
11/152022
$24,051.65
43.09
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1850%
11/15/2022
$65,546.35
4310
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1710%
11/15/2023
$81,058.60
4311
US Treasury Strips
Dean Witter Reynolds
6.1600%
11/15/2024
�$72,984.85
17 Inn a
Pare 10 of 11
Fund Inv. No. Investment Type Investment Bank Int. Rate Maturity Date Book Cost
Summary for 'Fund Number' = 601(31 detail records)
Fund Total $5,074,538.06
901
Surplus Bank Balance Fund
2020 Certificate of Deposit US Bank 2.2500% 12/31/2003 $3,000,000.00
4030 Municipal Investor Account (MIA) US Bank 1.4000% 1/1/2011 $5,004,764.50
3920 Repurchase Agreement (LGIP) State Investment Pool 1.4525% 1/1/2011 $922,535.10
Summary for'Fund.Number' = 901 (3 detail records)
Fund Total $8,927,299.60
Grand Total $78,751,905.0
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
11
AI #:
Submitting Data: PBPW - Utility Systems Division
Dept/Div/Board.. Surface Water Utility
Staff Contact...... Lys Hornsby, Ron Straka
Allen Quynn (X-7247)
Subject:
Consultant contract with R.W. Beck to revise the
existing Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models and update
the FEMA flood insurance rate study for the
Springbrook Creek Basin.
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Consultant .Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule
For Agenda of: February 3, 2003
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Risk Management ... X
Fiscal Impact: None
Expenditure Required... $245,000 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $245,000 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $254,000 (approved 2003 City Share Total Project.. $245,000
appropriation plus 2003 carry forward)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Surface Water Utility requests Council's approval of the proposed consultant contract to
complete the Springbrook Creek FEMA Floodplain Map Update. The total cost to complete the
model update and FEMA floodplain map is $245,000.
The purpose of the proposed consultant contract with R.W. Beck is to revise the existing
hydrologic/hydraulic models that were developed as part of the Eastside Green River Watershed
Plan, as well as update the FEMA flood insurance rate study and associated floodplain map.
The contract will be funded through the approved Surface Water Utility 2003 adjusted capital
improvement program budget and the 2003 appropriated adjustments for the Springbrook Creek
FEMA Floodplain Map Update. The approved 2003 proposed budget for the Springbrook Creek
FEMA Floodplain Map Update is $210,000 and the proposed 2002 carry forward amount of non -
expended funds from 2002 is $44,000, for a total appropriated amount of $254,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the proposed consultant contract with R.W. Beck in the amount of
$245,000 to complete the Springbrook Creek FEMA Floodplain Map Update.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3061 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update\1103
Contracts\agenda bill -final -refer. doc\AQ:lf
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 24, 2003
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner
FROM: Gregg Zimmerm dministrator
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Supervisor, Surface Water Utility (x-7248)
Allen Quynn, Project Manager (x. 7247)
SUBJECT: R.W. Beck Consultant Contract - Springbrook Creek FEMA
Floodplain Map Update
ISSUE:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests approval of the proposed consultant
contract with R.W. Beck, Inc. to complete the Springbrook Creek Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain Map Update.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests approval of the proposed consultant
contract with R.W. Beck, Inc. to complete the Springbrook Creek FEMA Floodplain Map
Update. The proposed contract amount is $245,000. The approved 2003 Surface Water Utility
Capital Improvement Program budget for the project is $210,000. An additional $44,000 is
proposed in the 2003 carryforward budget for a total appropriation of $254,000.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City completed the East Side Green River Watershed Plan (ESGRWP) in 1996. The
project involved the development of an HSPF hydrologic model of the Springbrook Creek
basin as well as an FEQ hydraulic model of the Springbrook Creek within the City's
jurisdictional boundaries between SW 43`d St. and the Black River Pump Station. The
ESGRWP also identified a series of possible hydraulic improvements that could provide flood
protection for the Renton valley.
January 24, 2003
Page 2
Results of the ESGRWP modeling showed that the simulated 100-year flood water elevation
was significantly lower (2-3 feet in some locations) than the elevations reported in the current
FEMA Flood Insurance Study. The City's approach at the time was to complete a substantial
number of the recommended improvements before embarking on an effort to complete a
floodplain map revision.
Since 1996, a significant number of the recommended drainage improvements have been
made from the Black River Pump Station forebay to and including the SW 27 St. Box Culvert
with only the 34`' St. Culvert, the removal of the old bridge north of SW 27`" St. and channel
improvements between SW 23rd St. and the Oakesdale Bridge remaining to be completed.
In 2000, R.W. Beck was again retained by the City to update the hydraulic model to
incorporate the hydraulic improvements completed since 1996. The results showed that the
target water surface elevations in Springbrook Creek could be lowered to the same level as
proposed by the ESGRWP recommended alternatives without completing the channel
improvements, which would have been a significant undertaking.
In reviewing the hydraulic model results, the City and the consultant recognized that the
current hydrologic model, which was developed in 1992, was also outdated and reflected land
use conditions from 1988. A revised hydrologic model is needed to accurately model storm
event runoff using current land use conditions. The revised model will also include an update
to the flood frequency analysis by including an additional 10 years of rainfall data from 1991
to 2001. The additional years include several significant storm events which help improve
the statistical accuracy of the model.
With the completion of a majority of the recommended conveyance improvements and the
requirement to have updated current condition basin hydrology for a floodplain map revision,
it seems logical at this point to move forward with the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) of Springbrook Creek.
The City met with a FEMA representative in the Spring of 2002 to discuss the proposed
floodplain mapping project, outline any requirements and gain FEMA approval of the
modeling methodology developed under the ESGRWP. FEMA recommended that the City
produce and submit a technical memorandum to neighboring jurisdictions and the US Army
Corps of Engineers summarizing the City's proposed technical approach to the hydrologic
and hydraulic analyses of Springbrook Creek. The City produced the technical
memorandum in July 2002 and has received favorable responses to the modeling approach
from a majority of jurisdictions and agencies.
R.W. Beck, Inc. will accomplish the following tasks:
• Update the existing hydrologic model to reflect current and future condition land use
and conveyance improvements.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3061 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update\1103
Contracts\issue paper.doc\AQ:lf
January 24, 2003
Page 3
• Revise frequency analysis with additional precipitation data and compute the 2-, 10-,
25-, 50-, 100-year flood frequency discharge and elevation at specific points on
Springbrook Creek.
• Update the current condition hydraulic model to include current and future condition
hydrology.
• Based on the revised hydraulics, update the ESGRWP Hydraulic Analysis of Flood
Control Alternatives document.
• Prepare and submit Flood Insurance Study Report and work maps to FEMA and
provide technical support during the public comment and review process.
It is anticipated that the hydrologic model update will be completed in the October of 2003
with the hydraulic model update to be completed by December 2003. The Draft Flood
Insurance Study will be submitted to FEMA in May of 2004. FEMA will produce the final
Flood Insurance Rate Map approximately one year later or May of 2005.
R.W. Beck, Inc. has been chosen to complete the proposed floodplain study as they
developed the existing hydrologic and hydraulic models and are most familiar with the
Springbrook Creek Basin dating back to 1990. R.W. Beck is listed on the currently approved
2003 Annual Consultant Contract Roster.
CONCLUSION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests approval of the proposed consultant
contract with R.W. Beck, Inc. to complete the Springbrook Creek Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain Map Update.
cc: Lys Hornsby
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3061 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map UpdateA 103
Contracts\issue paper.doc\AQ:lf
City of Renton
Springbrook Creek FEMA Remapping Study
Scope of Work
CAG- -
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
Introduction
January22,2003
R.W. Beck, Inc. (Consultant) assisted the City with the development of the East Side Green River
Watershed Plan (ESGRWP) (R.W. Beck, 1996). This work involved the development of an HSPF
hydrologic model of the ESGRW and an FEQ hydraulic model of the Renton Valley. The project
identified a series of improvements necessary to provide flood protection for the Renton Valley.
Since 1996, the City has made several conveyance improvements and several more have yet to be
completed. In 2000, the Consultant updated the hydraulic model to incorporate of the conveyance
improvements made between 1996 and 2000. As a part of the ESGRWP development, it was recognized
that the simulated 100-year flood elevation was lower than the regulated FEMA flood plain in some cases
by several feet. One of the primary objectives of this study is to develop new updated FEMA floodplain
maps.
It is also recognized that the current condition hydrology used for the ESGRWP was based upon aerial
photographs taken in 1989 and that the frequency analysis (used to select the 100-year flood) was based
upon a 30-year period of record. Therefore another objective of this study is to updated the ESGRWP
hydrologic analysis to current land use conditions and make use of the additional rainfall record (10-year
period of precipitation) to update the hydrologic frequency analysis.
The update to the hydrology will result in updated 100-year design flows. Another objective of this study
will be to confirm that the ESGRWP proposed improvement (as modified by the Consultants work in
2000; which suggests that Springbrook Creek channel widening is not necessary) will meet the City's
flood protection objectives.
Task 1 — Project Mana ement
This task includes project management activities including the following:
(1) Project Management Plan. The Consultant will develop a Project Management Plan which
describes this scope of work, staff assignments, budgets, the project schedule, invoice
requirements, and other important project requirements.
(2) Project Administration. Project administration includes contract administration, preparation of
subconsultant agreements, monthly invoice preparation, monitoring progress of
subconsultants, monthly project progress monitoring and reporting, project filing, and
project close-out.
(3) Client Coordination. Client coordination includes routine coordination with the client as well as
two meetings with the City.
Products:
1. Two team meetings
2. Invoices and progress reports
Task 2 — Field Surveys and Data Collection
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
The hydraulic modeling will be based upon prior field surveys and channel/culvert/bridge design
drawings (as -built when available). The City will provide copies of the existing FEMA study, design
drawings, and information of observed flood elevations/flows to the Consultant. Consultant will develop
a list of information sources used.
It is believed that the spacing of prior cross-section locations meets FEMA requirements, however, it is
understood that many of the data sources (i.e., cross -sections) were not "as -built". As a result, an
expectation of FEMA will be to perform a validation or comparison between cross -sections used in the
model and as -built conditions. The Consultant will review the cross-section data used and recommend to
the City which cross -sections should be surveyed and used for comparison purposes. Following City
approval, the cross -sections will be surveyed. The estimated budget for this work assumes that 6 cross -
sections will be surveyed and no more than 3 days in the field for survey work is required. The stream
reaches likely to require additional survey work are shown below, with the anticipated number of cross
sections shown in parentheses;
Downstream of SW 16`h Street where the cross sections were based upon SCS construction drawings
as modified by NHC during a survey of the thalweg (3)
Reach between SW 16`h Street and the new Oakesdale Avenue Bridge, where the channel has been
widened but no as-builts are available (1)
Upstream of SW 41" Street, where some channel widening was completed but no as -built drawings
are available (2)
Any additional field survey required for this project will be conducted under the Task 8 contingency..
Products:
1. List of information sources used for this study (aerial and ground survey)
2. Validation of existing cross -sections for approximately 6 sections.
Task 3 — Topoeraphv Data Development
The City shall provide to the Consultant all required mapping, include aerial photography and 2' contour
mapping. City shall prepare a description of the mapping accuracy and provide this information to the
Consultant, who will discuss the source and mapping accuracy in the Flood Insurance Study. As the City's
mapping meets National Map Accuracy Standards it is believed to also conform to FEMA requirements.
The City shall provide the following:
• King County produced aerial orthophoto from 2001 that covers entire Black River Basin.
• City produced contour mapping updated in 1999. It should be noted that some areas in the valley were
not updated in 1999 and are based on mapping from 1996. The City will identify those areas that do not
have topographic information updated in 1999.
• City produced electronic map identifying impervious surfaces as of 1996.
• City mapping is produced in accordance with National Map Accuracy Standards
• Vertical accuracy is 0.25 meters or 0.82 feet.
• Horizontal accuracy is +/- 1.0 feet
• Mapping Files will be submitted to consultant in AutoCAD release 2002
The City of Renton will obtain and provide digital City of Kent mapping including the following:
■ 1988 aerial topo over most of the valley; however, some of the annexation areas to the east where
updated as they were taken into the City
■ Impervious surface mapping produced in 1999 for non-residential areas only
■ Mapping showing building footprint and roadways that includes both residential and non-residential
areas.
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
■ Aerial topo has a vertical accuracy of 2.5 feet and a contour interval of 5 feet
■ Mapping produced in accordance with National Map Accuracy Standards
■ Mapping Files will be submitted to consultant in AutoCAD release 2000
It is noted that all of the City mapping is in elevation datum NAVD 88. All of the prior modeling was done
in NGVD 1929 datum. Therefore the modeling effort will continue to be completed in 1929 datum and
results will be adjusted to current NAVD 88 datum.
Task 4 — Hydrologic Analysis
4.1. Extend hydrometeorological data base through water year 2001
This work will be performed by a subconsultant, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC).
The hydrometeorological database used for the East Side Green River Watershed Plan covered the period
1961 through 1991. The data base will be extended through water year 2001, to the extent that necessary
data are available from the National Weather Service. This extended period covers the severe flooding of
February 1996 (which produced 100-year flood conditions on the Green River) and the recent period for
which water level and discharge data have been collected on the Springbrook Creek system by the City of
Renton and King County. Extension of the hydrometeorological database will allow comparison of
simulated flows against actual observations and provide a basis for adjusting hydraulic model parameters
to improve simulation results. The Consultant will obtain short interval flow data and precipitation data
from the USGS for the Mill Creek and Springbrook Creek gages and for the Green River near Auburn for
all periods which are readily available in digital format
The City will provide the Consultant with a list of all hydrometric data available from the City. The list
will include the locations of the gages, the types of data available, the period of record, a listing of gaps in
the data record, and any other relevant information. The Consultant will review this list and prioritize
which data are most relevant to model calibration. The City will then provide flow data and/or stage data
and rating curves in digital form for all gages (NHC already has rating curves current as of 1997). If
stage data are provided, these will be in a format that can be readily imported into the Consultant's
(NHC's) Stage2Q program (i.e., the data must be in an ASCII text file with one value per line, with each
line having a consistent format including a date/time stamp and data value).
4.2. Update land use data to current conditions
Land use data for "Existing Land Use" simulations for the East Side Green River Watershed Plan were
developed from 1988 aerials. Land use data for hydrologic modeling for new FIS study will be developed
from the most recent aerial photos available for the entire Springbrook Creek/Mill Creek basin from the
BRPS to the headwaters of a 24 square mile basin. The City will provide an aerial orthophoto mosaic
covering the entire Black River basin. The City will also provide all available digital (ArcView or
AutoCAD files pertaining to land-use/land cover in this basin. After reviewing the available data, the
Consultant and the City will determine an appropriate technique for developing existing condition land -
use data. In all likelihood the methodology will be to hand delineate land -use categories, digitize these
into GIS coverages, assign effective impervious, forested, grass and pasture percentages to each category,
and then use the GIS to perform an overlay analysis to develop input for the hydrologic model. Existing
conditions land-use/land- cover data will be provided in digital format. Note, however, that because
digital orthophotography is not available for the City of Kent portion of the basin, digital orthophotos will
not be a product of this study.
4.3. Refine hydrology for recent structural modifications
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
The HSPF hydrologic model will be refined to incorporate readily available as -built or current conditions
information for the following features within the City of Kent portion of the model:
■ Lagoons project
Earthworks Park detention facility
■ 2121h Avenue Detention facility
' Upper Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SR 167
• 98th Avenue Detention Facility
' Channel infrastructure improvements. (where an updated HEC-RAS model is available within the
City of Renton, or where an updated HEC-RAS model is developed in the Kent portions of the
basin as described below).
The HSPF model for portions of the basin in the City of Renton will be updated to include the following
improvements:
' The SW 27`h St. culvert improvements
■ The Oakesdale bridge crossing at SW 41" St.
■ Any significant known changes in cross sections subsequent to the previous HEC-2 modeling
(this will include the elimination of the berm in the "Renton Wetlands")
■ Re-routing of flows through the Panther Creek Wetland and new outlet along the SW 23rd Street
Drainage Channel (not including the SW 23rd Street Drainage Channel improvements or Olympic
Pipeline Culvert Crossing)
Channel infrastructure improvements in the City of Kent will be incorporated into the model. This work
will include updating the HEC-2 model for Mill Creek between its confluence with Springbrook Creek,
and the outlet of Earthworks Park to incorporate conveyance improvements made since 1996. In addition,
the HEC-2 model for Springbrook Creek between the northern City of Kent limits at the upstream side of
the culvert under S 180th Street and upstream end of the SR 167 culvert crossing will be updated to
incorporate conveyance improvements made since 1996 (including the 188h Street and 192°d Street
Culverts project being constructed this year). The purpose of this work will be to provide new FTABLEs
for the HSPF model. This work will include:
■ Updating the structures at Central Avenue, Novak Lane, Bowen -Scarf Ford, SR 167, S 228th Street,
Fischer Industries access road, and 196th Street. In addition, there are plans underway to construct
new crossings at Chandler Bay Apartments and the Burlington Northern Railroad and Interurban
Trail Bridge as well as the Springbrook Creek crossings at 188`h Street and 192nd Street. The plans
for these projects will be requested from the City of Kent and incorporated into the models.
■ Modifying the Manning's coefficients where habitat restoration such as root wads, log deflectors,
boulders and riparian vegetation have been added. These areas include the areas in the 1998 Mill
Creek Habitat Improvement Project and possibly the area north of S 212th Street.,
■ Updating the starting water surface elevations for the models to reflect the latest FEQ analysis (R.
W. Beck 1997).
■ Updating the models from HEC-2 format to HEC-RAS format.
Note that as part of the Mill Creek Stormwater Management Analysis Update (R. W. Beck, August 2000),
it was recommended to survey selected cross sections of the creeks to determine if there has been
signification aggradation or degradation and to consider a complete new survey if there were significant
changes in the cross sections. However, this will not be included as part of this project.
Note that the hydraulic updates described above are meant to incorporate changes that have a significant
impact on the HSPF hydrologic model. Thus the hydraulic model may not be entirely consistent with the
project FEQ model. The purpose of the hydraulic model updates envisioned here is to adequately define
FEMAscope1-22-03.doc
FTABLEs for development of the hydrologic model, such that model calibration can be completed and
runoff data can be generated for input to FEQ.
4.4. Calibrate HSPF Model to USGS data
The updated land use data will be incorporated in the Existing Land Use HSPF model developed for the
Watershed Plan and updated as described above in Task 4.3. HSPF simulated existing condition flows
will be calibrated to recent available data from as described in Task 4.2. Model calibration will be
performed to generally accepted standards. These include calibration of annual flow volumes to ±5%,
calibration of seasonal flow volumes to t15%, and calibration of peak flows and storm volumes to ±20%
whenever possible. The City and Consultant will review the model calibration to ensure that the
calibration is adequate for this study. The Consultant will check with FEMA to determine if calibration
as proposed is acceptable. The calibrated model will be used for the tasks described below.
4.5. Update HSPF hydrologic modeling for current conditions
The revised HSPF model will be rerun to update existing condition hydrology through water year 2001.
4.6. Extend Green River regulated flow record
The basic intent of this task is to extend the relevant hydrologic records suitable for analyzing the BRPS
and the lower Springbrook Creek floodplain to a length of approximately 53 water years - the same length
as HSPF simulations of local runoff. Observed discharges on the Green River at Auburn have been (or
will be) obtained from the USGS for the period between the construction of Howard Hanson Dam (1962)
and water year 2001. The HSPF model covers the period starting in October 1948. Thus, the simulated
local hydrologic record is significantly longer than the regulated Green River flow record. Considering
the uncertainty in the frequency analysis of lower Springbrook Creek it is desired to increase the length of
the Green River flow record to allow a longer period of concurrent flows for simulation of the BRPS.
Under this task the consultant would synthesize a plausible set of regulated Green River flows for the
period of WY 1949 through WY 1962. To develop the plausible regulated flow record the consultant
would:
• Gather available Howard Hanson inflow, outflow, and storage data for the period 1962 — 2001.
• Examine reservoir operations for major storm events on the Green River in this period.
• Determine if there are obvious threshold volumes below which target flows at Auburn are
maintained below 9,000 cfs or thresholds above which reservoir releases typically exceed 9,000
cfs.
• Discuss current operational practices at Howard Hanson with Corps of Engineers staff
• Develop a set of plausible operating rules (Auburn target flows) corresponding to historic
reservoir inflow and volume conditions
• Review reservoir inflow volumes for major storm events on the Green River between 1948 and
1962. (over this period there were ten annual peak flows at Auburn above 13,000 cfs).
• Apply the reservoir operating rules to estimate regulated discharges at Auburn for water years
1948-1962.
Preliminary review indicates that the February 1951 event and the November 1959 event show promise as
constraining events at the BRPS. The addition of these two events should increase the robustness of the
proposed frequency and floodplain analyses of Springbrook Creek.
It should be noted that we have budgeted a maximum of 40 hours of staff time to perform this task. If,
after obtaining and reviewing the relevant data, it becomes clear that a plausible record extension cannot
be made using the approach described above the Consultant will consult with the City and determine an
appropriate course of action.
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
4.7. Estimate revised flood frequency quartiles and generate new design event inputs to the FEQ model
The updated HSPF model and the previously developed BRPS-SIM model will be run for the period of
record and annual maximum flows and stages at key locations will be extracted and subject to frequency
analyses. The key locations will be the same as were used in the Watershed Plan. Based on the results of
these analyses, the Consultant will define 25-, 50-year and 100-year storage events and 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-,
100-year conveyance events. Using the updated existing condition HSPF model a set of design storm
hydrographs corresponding to these events will be developed for input to the FEQ hydraulic model.
Design hydrographs will be developed by extracting simulated hydrographs for events in the historic
record and scaling the ordinates of the hydrographs such that the peak HSPF simulated flows
approximately match the estimated design flow quantiles.
Note that the development of an extended Green River flow record (Task 4.6) will provide one plausible
set of regulated Green River flows but will not capture the full range of possible flow scenarios.
Considering the inherent difficulties in precisely meeting target flows at Auburn a wide range of actual
flows are possible even with the same target flow. Even minor variations in Green River flows can have
significant impacts on storage in the BRPS, and the resultant frequency quantiles. Therefore the
consultant will perform a limited sensitivity analysis of the impacts of variations in the regulated Green
River flow record on operation of the BRPS and resultant backwater effects in Springbrook Creek. Prior
to performing this work, the Consultant will discuss the approach with the City.
Note, that based on a preliminary meeting with FEMA (April 19, 2002), it is not necessary to perform
analysis of the 500 year event. The 500-year event was not included in the prior FEMA floodplain study.
4.8. Update future conditions land -use, HSPF hydrologic modeling and flood frequency quantiles and
generate new design event inputs to the FEQ models
Updated future conditions land use data will be developed and used to configure a future conditions
HSPF model. The City will be responsible for providing zoning or comprehensive plan data describing
the full build out land -use for the entire basin in digital (either ArcView Shape File or AutoCAD ".DXF")
format. The HSPF model will be configured to segregate areas of future development and redevelopment
from areas which are currently developed and not expected to change in the future. The Consultant and
the City will cooperatively develop a set of reasonable assumptions about future redevelopment in the
basin. Separation of the potential development areas from the existing developed areas will allow the
effects of on -site detention to be evaluated in a future project if desired. Note that the scope of work for
this project does not include the design of theoretical on -site detention facilities. However, conceptual
facilities may be designed and incorporated in the model if the Consultant can perform this task within the
available budget.
The updated future conditions HSPF and BRPS-SIM models will be run for the period of record and
annual maximum flows and stages at key locations will be extracted and subject to frequency analyses.
The key locations will be the same as were used in the Watershed Plan. Based on the results of these
analyses NHC will define 25-, 50-, and 100-year storage events and 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year
conveyance events. Using the updated future condition HSPF model a set of design storm hydrographs
corresponding to these events will be developed for input to the FEQ hydraulic model. Design
hydrographs will be developed by extracting simulated hydrographs for events in the historic record and
scaling the ordinates of the hydrographs such that the peak HSPF simulated flows approximately match
the estimated design flow quantiles.
4.9. Reporting
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
The Consultant will document the updated hydrologic analyses in a format that is consistent with the
requirements of a physical map revision submittal to FEMA. Typically, this report will include a
statement of the modeling approach and assumptions, a listing of the data used and its source, and a
tabular summary of the results developed for input to the hydraulic model. Note that this is not likely to
be as comprehensive as the reporting undertaken for the East Side Green River Watershed Plan and will
concentrate on changes in techniques, assumptions, and data since the Watershed Plan. The Watershed
Plan report will be incorporated by reference for background information on watershed conditions and a
discussion of the general hydrologic modeling approach.
A brief memorandum will be prepared outlining the modifications made to the Mill Creek and
Springbrook Creek HEC-RAS models.
4.10. Meetings/Project Management (for Subconsultant)
An allowance for the Subconsultant is included for up to 16 hours of meetings to coordinate this project
with the City and/or to discuss the approach and deliverables with FEMA.
Task 4 - Deliverables
The following deliverables will be produced:
• Updated hydrometeorologic database in Watershed Data Management (WDM) format. The WDM
format is supported by the USGS and is the standard database format for HSPF and FEQ applications.
This format is also consistent with the City's hydrometric database as previously developed by NHC.
• Existing and Future Conditions Land -use coverages in ArcView shape file format
• Updated and calibrated HSPF Models for Existing and Future Conditions in digital and hard copy
format
• Flow and stage frequency figures and tabulated results as required to establish the design events for
Existing and Future Conditions.
• HSPF generated runoff hydrographs in digital format for use as input to the FEQ model for Existing
and Future Conditions.
• A chapter for the Physical Map Revision report to FEMA documenting the hydrologic analyses in
MS Word format.
• Updated HEC-RAS models for Springbrook Creek (Renton) and Mill Creek (Kent)
• Brief memorandum outlining the modifications made to the Mill Creek HEC-RAS model in Kent
Task 5 — Hydraulic Analysis
5.1— Update FEQ Model Version
The FEQ model developed for the ESGRWP was prepared using version 8.58 (July 27, 1995) and has been
subsequently updated. FEMA has approved FEQ version 8.92 and FEQUTL version 4.68. FEQUTL is a
utility program that aids in developing input into FEQ. This work will include updating the ESGRWP model
to versions accepted by FEMA.
5.2 — Validation run of Current Condition Hydraulic Model
The FEQ model, originally developed as part of the ESGRWP has been subsequently updated in October
2000 and April 2001 by the Consultant. The model updates have been made such that the current
condition model incorporates the constructed improvements and updated cross-section information that
have been made since 1996. These model modifications included:
FEMAscopei-22-03.d oc
• Improved channel from SW 161h Street to Oakesdale Bridge
• Improved channel from SW 4 1 " Street to SW 43`d Street
• New crossing of SR 167 (including downstream channel improvements and upstream fish
ladder weir)
• Hunter Douglas Bridge
• Oakesdale Bridge
• Oakesdale Bushiness Park box culvert upstream of 41 S` Street
• SW 271h Street Culvert improvements
• Olympic Pipeline Culvert Improvements
This model will be used to simulate a validation simulation using the November 14, 2001 storm event.
Prior to conducting the validation, the Consultant will perform a one -day field reconnaissance to observe
channel conditions and vegetation along the channel banks. Prior roughness coefficients will be reviewed
and if necessary revised to reflect current channel conditions. In addition, the Consultant will review
when the berm was removed within the Renton Wetland, and if necessary remove the berm from the
model if it was removed prior to the November 12, 2001 event. Following the simulation of the
November 12, 2001 storm, a comparison will be made between simulated and observed water levels and
flows where available. Conclusions about the model validation will be made. One coordination
meeting is included in this task.
The Consultant will review the simulation results with the City and compare the results to generally
accepted standards. If warranted, the Consultant will attempt modifications to improve results. A budget
allowance of up to 24 hours is included for this effort. If additional effort is necessary, the Consultant
will make recommendations to the City and request additional funds from the Task 8 contingency. It is
noted that there is only one event to provide data for calibration and thus calibration may not be possible
given the available data.
Data to be provided by the City for this comparison include;
• Flow at of the SW 27`b St. culvert and comparison with rating curve by NHC
• City provided pump station gage data
• High water mark at the Oakesdale Ave/SW 41 st culvert crossing
• High water mark at the old railroad bridge
• High water mark at SW 27`h St. culvert
• High water mark at the P-9 channel/east valley road crossing
In addition to the simulated and observed water levels and flows, The Consultant will also perform a brief
qualitative comparison of the relative flood frequency at various points in the system. That is, the flood
frequency of this event along Springbrook Creek at the USGS gage along Springbrook (e.g., 10-year) can
be compared to the relative flood frequency at other points in the system such as lower Springbrook or
along the SW 23`d Street Drainage channel to see if a similar flood frequency is simulated. It is
understood that this effort provides only a qualitative comparison and the flood frequency could differ at
different points in the system. It is also understood that this comparison cannot be done until the work of
Task 5.3 is complete and as such this information will not be used as a basis for evaluated the calibration.
The effort for this analysis is estimated at 10 hours.
5.3 — Update Current Conveyance Condition Hydraulic Model with New Current and Future Condition
Hydrology
The FEQ current conveyance condition model, updated if necessary in Task 5.2, will be used to predict
water surface elevations using the updated current and future condition hydrology. Storms to be
simulated include the current and future condition 2-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year conveyance and the 25-,
50-, 100- year storage events.
5.4 — Update Future Condition Hydraulic Model to Include Future Improvements with new Hydrology
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
In April 2001, the Consultant updated the October 2000 model to include anticipated Future
improvements, hereafter referred to as the Future Condition Hydraulic Model. These improvements
included:
• Removal of the bridge north of SW 27'h Street
• Modification of the connection between the two Renton wetland cells (to 3 36-inch culverts)
• The Renton wetland mitigation project
• Replacement of the culvert at SW 34`h Street
• Replacement of the culvert at Oakesdale Avenue SW
• SW 43`d Street SW improvements
The April 2001 model Future Condition Hydraulic Model will be used (with some minor modifications)
to predict water surface elevations using the updated future condition hydrology. Storms to be simulated
include the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year conveyance and the 25-, 50-, and 100-year storage event.
Minor modifications include;
adding a new branch to reflect a parallel pipe system proposed for the SW 43`d Street system. The
currently configured model assumes a single flow path from SW 43`d Street at Lind to Springbrook
Creek at the downstream side of SW 41s' Street. The model will be configured to simulate the
existing pipe system as well as a parallel pipe system along Lind Avenue and SW 391h Street.
review the City's proposed future Corps of Engineers planting mitigation plans and assess the need
to adjust Manning's roughness coefficients for future improved conditions. The Consultant will
provide a brief memorandum to obtain City input on this issue prior to completion of this task.
Modification to reflect the elimination of the berm in the Renton Wetland
It is noted that this task does not include budget to separate simulation results to reflect each modification
of the model. However, summary output will be saved and provided to the City.
Resulting water surface elevations will be compared to the target elevations identified in the ESGRWP.
It is noted that the City had originally developed several of the target elevations. An allowance of up to
16 hrs is included to evaluate these target elevations.
The results of the analysis will be used to confirm whether currently proposed improvements will provide
the desired level of flood protection. If so, the Consultant shall proceed to the work of Task 5.6. If not
additional hydraulic analysis will be necessary and completed under a contingency task 5.5.
5.5 - Updated Hydraulic Analysis of ESGRWP Improvements (Optional Task)
This is an optional task and is not to be used without prior authorization from the City. It is intended to
be used if the updated hydrologic/hydraulic modeling shows that currently proposed ESGRWP
improvements (not including channel improvements) will not achieve the desired flood protection
objectives. The Consultant would meet with the City to review options for alternative improvements.
Because the specific effort to evaluate alternatives cannot accurately be defined at this time, an allowance
of up to 60 hours of analysis, is included in this contingency task. The intent would be to modify the
model to simulate the alternative improvements, necessary to achieve the desired flood control objectives.
The result would be summarized in a table for review by the City. Optional improvements that could be
considered are channel improvements, less extensive future planting, change of design standards, and
change the pump capacity (or assumptions about pumping limitations) at the pump station.
5.6 — Establish Floodways and Flood Elevations
Under task 5.3 updated water surface elevations are developed for the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-year
conveyance and 25-, 50-, and 100-year storage simulations. Under this task, the model will be used to
estimate the water levels for the FEMA 1-ft rise 100-year floodway. It is noted that the floodplain
mapping will be specific to Springbrook Creek and its floodplains, including the Panther Creek Wetland.
It will not include other isolated flooded areas separated from Springbrook Creek by conveyance systems
(e.g., Lind Avenue, etc.).
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
5.7—Provide independent review and guidance on FEMA submittal
A Subconsultant (NHC) will review the work maps developed by RW Beck for consistency with current
FEMA mapping standards (to the extent that these are known) so they are in an appropriate format to
support the request for a Physical Map Revision. The budget includes an allowance of 32 hours for NHC
to respond to questions from RW Beck staff or FEMA's review contractor during the review process.
Hours under this task will be tracked separately and, if additional effort is required, an additional scope of
work and budget will be defined.
5.8 — Prepare Technical Support (FEMA) Notebook
A Technical Support Data Notebook will be created and submitted to FEMA. The notebook will include
the information requested in FEMA document "Instructions for Organizing and Submitting FIS Technical
Support Data". A draft of the notebook will be submitted to the City for review and comment prior to
submittal to FEMA.
Task 5 - Deliverables
• FEQ model updated to version 8.92
• Updated current conveyance FEQ model
• Updated future conveyance FEQ model
• Technical Support Notebook (1 draft and 2 final copies)
Task 6 —Reporting
6.1 — Flood Insurance Study
The Consultant will prepare a standard Flood Insurance Study report and submit one original and three
copies to the FEMA and three copies to the City. It will be prepared in accordance with requirements set -
forth in FEMA document 37. The report will include detailed descriptions of the study and its results,
photographs of the streams, flood frequency discharge values, floodway data tables, water surface
profiles, cross section labeling key, work maps showing: 1) 100-year floodplain; 2) 100-yr floodway; 3)
cross sections locations and alignments; 4) Base Flood Elevations (BFE's); 5) flood insurance rate zone;
6) City boundaries and right-of-way; and 7) elevation reference marks. Note that this is not likely to be as
comprehensive as the reporting undertaken for the ESGRWP. A draft report will be prepared for City
review and comment prior to submittal to FEMA. The 100-year floodplain map will also be submitted in
electronic form in AutoCAD 2000.
6.2 — ESGRWP Supplement
The Consultant will prepare a supplement to the ESGRWP Hydraulic Analysis of Flood Control
Alternatives thetdocuments the analysis of Task 4.5. This document will summarize the pending
ESGRWP flood control conveyance improvements and corresponding hydraulic simulation results. All
of the improvements will be included in one simulation (i.e., simulating the results of one improvement at
a time is not included). Note that this supplement will be as comprehensive as the reporting undertaken
for the ESGRWP and will concentrate on changes in techniques, assumptions, and data since the
ESGRWP.
Task 6 — Deliverables
• 3 copies draft Flood Insurance Study
• one original and six copies of the Flood Insurance Study
• 3 copies of the ESGRWP Supplement
FEMAscopel-22-03.doc
Task 7 — Post -Submission Assistance
Following the submission of the study materials to FEMA, the Consultant will assist with the following:
1) answer questions from the technical reviewer at Michael Baker Corporation; 2) attend the community
meeting that will be held to present the preliminary FIS maps; 3) provide additional information and
guidance to FEMA as needed.
Task 8 — Contingency
This is a contingency task and is not to be used without prior authorization from the City. It is intended
to be used if the City request additional work beyond this scope of work.
Assumptions
1. The budget is based upon project management and technical activity occurring through December of
2003, with some minor amount of activity (Task 7) occurring in 2004. If schedule is extended there may
be additional costs.
2. It is noted that the original FEQ cross sections in some instances were extended into the floodplain using
available Corps topographic mapping. It is assumed that these elevations will correlate well with the new
City topography, such that there is not a discrepancy between the cross section top width and the mapped
FEMA floodplain. If adjustments are necessary, this will be done under the Task 8 contingency.
FEMAscope1-22-03.doc
W14IIIC3Y01.1
Schedule
A schedule is attached as Exhibit B-1. The draft flood insurance study will be submitted by January,
2004. Note that the schedule is preliminary and will be affected by reviews periods by the FEMA
contractor.
EXHIBIT C
Budget
The Consultant will be reimbursed on a time and materials basis up to a maximum of $245,000. The
budget estimate is summarized on Exhibit C-1. The level of service associated with the scope items will
be reasonably consistent with the allocated time and budgets for the assigned tasks. Significant deviations
in requested services or products from that identified will be the basis for additional work.
The budget is based upon a Cost plus fixed fee. The overhead costs are 182.43% of the direct salary
costs. The net fee, which represents the Consultant's profit, shall be 15% of the direct salary plus
overhead costs. A 5% mark-up is applied to subconsultant costs.
FEMAscope1-22-01doc
Springbrook Creek FEW
DATE: 1/24/2003
CLIENT: City of Renton PREPARED BY: MSG DATE:
Exhibit E-1
lapping Study
RW B-221 B
Rev 1111119
PROJ NAME: Springbrook Creek FEMA Remapping Study CHECKED BY: MW DATE:
WORK ORDER: 00-00000-00000-0000 PROJ MGR.: Giseburt OPS APPROVAL: DATE:
STAFF LABOR HOURS REQUIRED BY TASK CS APPROVAL: DATE:
Labor Code MSG SJS MBW Jr xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx Multiplier? 3.24795
Title PM QA/QC SrEng Eng Fin. Ops CADD W. Pro Clerk Bill Rates? No (Yes I No)
Raw Salary $42.73 $58.66 $40.04 $24 $29.46 $24.00 $21,93 $20.33
Salary Escalation 2.5% 0.0% 2.5% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%1 EXTENDED HRS EXTENDED COSTS EXTENDED REVENUES
Multiplier Rate (1) 142.25 190.49 133.30 79.90 95.68 77.96 71.23 66.03 % Labor Expenses Subconsult. Cost Labor Total
Bill Rate $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hours Cntgcy Raw Cost (2) (3) Total Revenue Revenue
TASK
DESCRIPTION
a
f mect Management
040.
:: 0.0
.> 240
I: 0 0 : -
<: 36.0
;;I Q 0
;j6.0
156,0
.; $531T
�:.:: $556
$0
I: $5;873
':::817,656
!I $18;1j12:
1A
Subtask 1.A
60.0
0.0
24.0
36.0
36.0
156.0
156.0
$5,317
$17,556
113
Blank
0.0
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
1C
Blank
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
Task Raw Cost
$2,563.8
$0.0
$961.0
1 $0.0
$1,060.6
$0.0
$0.0
$731.9
1 $5,317.2
0%
$5,317
2
FI61tl Surrey/Pala Cohe tion
-..
14,0
:; 0 0
56 0 ;,
32.0
0 0
0 0
. 0 0
12.0
114 0
114
::: > 3 852:
.. $760
$0
:>: $4;612
$12 906
:: $13;566;
2A
Survey Confirmation
8.0
32.0
32.0
6.0
78.0
78.0
$2,513
$8,357
28
Data Collection/Summary
6.0
24.0
6.0
36.0
36.0
$1,339
$4,449
2C
Blank
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
Task Raw Cost
$598.2
$0.0
$2,242.2
$768.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$244.0
$3,852.4
0%
$3,852
4
Hydrologic Analysis ";; . :;I
16 0 ::::
00
.....
36 0
60 0 .
. 0 01.
42 0
":::;12 0
$,0
1640
1$4 0
. E4 769'
. $730
<3103 371;
:: 510$;8$0
815 78b
:: $Sg9;88Y:
4.0
Review/Coordination
8.0
12.0
20.0
20.0
$822
$2,738
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
4.3
HEC-RAS (modeling and reporting)
8.0
24.0
80.0
12.0
12.0
8.0
144.0
144.0
$3,937
$13.048
Task Raw Cost
$683.7
$0.0
$1,441.4
$1,920.0
$0.0
1 $288.0
$263.2
$162.6
$4,758.9
0%
$4,769
5
HydtauhC AR21ysrS
88 p :i
si 9.0
272.0
44 0
;i'i 0 0
32 0
0 0
0 0
415 Q
416.fl
?' $15,821
$2 069
$3,889
:; $27379
S51 941
$83699j
5.1
Update FED Model Version (PRELIMINARY
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
$320
$1.066
5.2
Validation Run
8.0
60.0
68.0
68.0
$2,744
$9,136
5.3
Update Model w/ new Hydology
6.0
12.0
8.0
26.0
26.0
$929
$3,092
5.4
Update Fut. Model w/ new Hydrology
6.0
40.0
8.0
54.0
54.0
$2,050
$6.825
5.6
Update EWSGP Improvements (cont.)
16.0
40.0
4.0
60.0
60.0
$2,381
$7,928
5.6
Establish Floodways and Elevations (workmap)
8.0
60.0
24.0
24.0
116.0
116.0
$3,896
$12,924
5.0
Meetings
12.0
12.0
24.0
24.0
$993
$3,307
5.7
Incorporated Independent review
6.0
16.0
22.0
22.0
$897
$2,986
5.8
Prepare Technical Support Notebook
6.0
24.0
8.0
38.0
38.0
$1,409
$4,676
4C
Blank
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
Task Raw Cost
$2,905.6
$0.0
$10,890.9
$1,056.0
$0.0
$768.0
$0.0 1
$0.0
$15,620.5
0%
$15,621
6 :.::
R. eportinq : - ' --- -
....._ ......._. ...:.. ..
26.0 ...
I' 8 0
.
:; 80 0 . -:�
:..:.:.
�� 0.0
; �: 0.0
:
:;; 32.0
:28 0
>,
.-:; 54.0
, , :�:;188 0.
:: 188 0
::i $6,450::
:::: ::::
_ _.:: $985
. ....
.. $0
...
: i -$7 435
... ,..::::::
:i i$21,300
:::: ..::..
'i $223$5;
.:....
6.1
DraftlFinal Flood Insurance Study
14.0
4.0
40.0
16.0
16.0
8.0
98.0
98.0
$3,332
$11,001
6.2
ESGRWP Supplement
12.0
4.0
40.0
16.0
12.0
6.0
90.0
90.0
$3,118
$10,299
5C
Blank
0.0
0.0
$0
$0
Task Raw Cost
$1.111.0
$469.2
$3,203.2
1 $0.0
$0.0
$768.0
$614.0
$284.6
$6,450.0
0%
$6,450
7
I st SObtniSsion AsStslapCe
10,0
0 0
24 0
040.
0.0
0 0
':0 0
0 0
34 0
34 0
: $1,388
: 5180
$0
;> $1;;668
$4,622
84i801:
7.0
Public Meeting
8.0
8.0
16.0
$662
$2.204
7.0
Answer Questions and Provide input
2.0
16.0
18.0
$726
$2,417
7.0
Blank
�$1,3188.3
0.0
$0
$0
Task Raw Cost
$427.3
$0.0
$961.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
$0.0
0%,
$1,388
TOTALS: hrs 194.0 8.0 492.0 156.0 36.0 76.0 40.0 70.0 1,072.0 1.001
$37,387
$5,279
$113,061
$155,727
$124,009 $242,348
SudgetFEMA1-22-03.xls 1124/2003 Page 1 of 2
DATE:
CLIENT: City of Renton PREPARED BY: MSG
PROJ NAME: Springbrook Creek FEMA Remapping Study CHECKED BY: MW
WORK ORDER: 00A0000-00000-0000 PROJ MGR.: Giseburt OPS APPROVAL:
Labor Code
Title
Raw Salary
Salary Escalation
Multiplier Rate (1)
BIII Rate
1/24/2003
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
STAFF LABOR HOURS REQUIRED BY TASK
CS APPROVAL: DATE:
MSG
PM
SJS
QA/QC
MBW
SrEng
Jr
Eng
xxxxx
Fin. Ops
xxxxx
CADD
xxxxx
W. Pro
xxxxx
Clerk
Multiplier? 3.24795
BIII Rates? No (Yes / No)
$42.73
$58.65
$40.04
$24
$29.46
$24.00
$21.93
$20.33
2.5%
0.0%
2.5%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%11
EXTENDED HRS
EXTENDED COSTS
EXTENDED REVENUES
142.26
190.49
133.30
79.90
95.68
77.95
71.23
66.03
Hours
%
Cntgcy
Labor
Raw Cost
I Expenses
(2)
I Subconsult.
(3)
Cost
Total
Labor
Revenue
Total
Revenue
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
raw costs $8,290
$469
$19,700
$3,744
$1,061
$1,824
$877 $1,423
$34.88 avg $ per hr ok
ok ok ok
ok
revenue $27,597
$1,624
$65,583
$12,464
$3,445
$5,924
$2,849 $4,622
$115.68 avg $ per hr
calculated multiplier 3.33
3.25
3.33
3.33
3.25
3.25
3.25 3.25
3.32 overall mult.
hrs as % of total hrs 18.1 %
0.7 %
45.9 %
14.6 %
3.4%
7.1 %
3.7 % 6.6 %
Overall Contingency
0.0%
rev as % of total rev 22.3%
1.2%
52.9%
10.1%
2.8%
4.8%
2.3% 3.7%
LABOR REVENUE
$124,009
1. Multiplier Rate = Raw Salary x (1 + Salary Escalation) x Multiplier.
EXPENSES (2)
$6,279
2. Expense costs from RWB-222B.
Check sum of hours:
1,072 1,072
ok
SUBCONSULTANTS (3)
$113,061
3. Subconsultant costs from RWB-223B.
Check sum of raw labor:
37,387 0
ERROR
TOTAL PROJECT REVENUE
$242,348
TASK 8 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE
$2,652
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$246,000
BudgetFEMA1-22-03.xis 1/24/2003 Page 2 of 2
Budget Estimate
Springbrook Creek HSPF Model and FEMA FIS Update
isk Staff Resources (hours)
Imk jpt 'dmh pch als sn etv kns
1 Extend hydromet data base through w.y. 2001 1:E .=4 8 32 4 $ 4,040.36
t r'{ i
2 Update existing conditions land use data i 1: 4 4 24 64 16 $ 9,729.96
3 Refine Hydrology for As -built City of Kent Lagoons,
Earthworks Park, 98th Ave Facility, HEC-RAS (by others)
4 Calibrate to USGS gages and Renton Data
5 Update HSPF Model through water year 2001
6 Extend Green River flow record
7 Estimate revised flood frequency quantiles and generate
design event inputs to the FEQ model
8 Revise fuure conditions hydrologic analysis
9 Provide review and guidance on FEMA submittal
10 Reporting
11 Meetings
Total labor hours
Rate ($/hr)
Labor cost
Total labor cost
Disbursements:
Hydrometeorologic data (NCDC/USGS)
Misc
Total disbursements
TOTAL COST (labor+ 1.lxdisbursements)
taff:
Imk- Karpack - principal (hydrology)
jpj - Johnson - FEMA review (in-house)
dmh - Hartley - senior hydrologist
pch - Henshaw - engineer
als - Sansone - junior engineer
4
y�i6 x
24
80
8
$ 11,603.20
8
( 24
40
160
16
$ 21,546.40
1 �tr
E
8
32
$ 3,487.22
r 8, t
a
4,437.92
tags.
4
16
64
$ 8,214.00
8
100 40
16
$ 16,037.80
'12
'�
32 -
24
$ 9,227.76
v k
4 ,
y
4 16 ?
8
64
16
24
$ 11,482.08
16 12� f
16
2
$ 6,770.20
.8
63
52 101
140
596 104
72
30
1fi7
77a59� 85t 88
8588 50 1
$10,546
$8,705 $11,876
$12,589
$46,244 $8,932
$6,183
$1,503
$106,577
$750
$250
$1,000
$107,677
sn - North - GIS
etv - VanderMeer - surveying/CAD
kns - Steen - word processing
Springbrook Creek FEMA Update Page 1
QF
CLIENT: City of Renton
PROJ NAME: Springbrook Creek FEMA Remapping Study
NORK ORDER: 00-00000-00000-0000
PROJ MGR.: Giseburt
ENGINEERING CO' 7STIMATE
SUBCONSULTAN TIMATE
RWB-223B
Rev 11111198
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
OPS APPROVAL:
DATE:
CS APPROVAL:
DATE:
SUBCONSULTANT
Task 1
Mrs. Exp. Labor
Task 2
Hm. Exp. Labor
Task 3
I Mrs. Exp. Labor
Task 5
Hm. Exp. Labor
Task 6
Mrs. Exp. Labor
Task 7
Mrs. Exp. Labor
TOTALS
Mrs. Exp. Labor
Northwest Hydraulic Consultants
Hydrolog! $1.000 $85,967
Reporting $11,482
$9,228
1.000
106,677
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"0 marn- p v $0 $0 a $v $u v $l,uuu $91,449 0 $0 $9,226 0 $0 $0 0 $0
w/ Mark-up $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050 $102,321 $0 $9,689 $0 $0 $0
0 ok
1,050 ok
112,011 ok
�v v i�,vvv
i�vo,orr
$0
Exp w/mkup 1,050
labw/mkup it 2,011
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES
$1,000
SUBTOTAL LABOR
$106,677
SUBTOTAL
$107,677
Mark-up 5 h
$5,384
TOTAL
$113,061
BudgetFEMAt-22.03.xls 1/24/2003 - Page 1 of 1
O
3
a
W
y N N N
Jc' JC Jc Jc Jc' Jc' A W N �
A A A A A A
a 0 C C 2 0
30o
,mo•�oni�n n`m'
O L
O O 3 -n m
0 m O K a
N m N 0 m
O — (D m
O y O
} y O O N
m a cn 3
�n=USa
Dy.e n
a m
� am
CD 0
N N
N
O
CD
n
1-15
15-28
ch 1-15
cb 15-31
1 1-15
1 15-30
1-15
15-31
1-15
15-30
1-15
15-31
ust 1-15
ust 15-31
1-15
1 1-30
1-15
15-31
1-15
15-30
1-15
15-31
1-15
15-31
1-15
15-30
�h 1-15
t 15-31
1-15
15-30
1-15
15-31
1-15
15-30
1-15
15-31
ut 1-15
;1
fD
3
tV
-0 m
v x
3 =
(Q �
C
>Z W
.0 E
FINANCE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 3, 2003
r Lit w1A.1C VI VIt7I1lLl a7C/ Y/GCJ iV/ .//JGd/ Yvan 'CVV.7
(Referred January 27, 2003)
The finance Committee recommends concurrence in. Staff s recommendation to approve the
2003 Fee Schedule for medical/dental and prescription" claims processed by Health
Management Administrators and Prescription Card Services.
The City will continue to utilize the services of Healthcare Management Administrators (HMA)
and. Prescription. Card Services (PCS) to administer medical, dental and prescription, claims
within our self funded plan. The total cost of services will be approximately $27.07. per month;
per employee.. The fee includes prescription services, administration of medical and dental
claims; preferred provider program (PPO).rental as well as utilization/large case management,.
..COBRA and HIPAA administration�sei've.
ices-: Funds for this service are included inahe
approved 2003 Budget., %'
14
.."
,.
The Commi er recQmraiends, the fee schetlule be effe tine January1, 2003. These
cha requ re a ditior�al"budget appropriations
4- try 4 , ���r�a��
King Parker, Chair
�.
R ndy C` n, Vice=Chair ' s
f
Don Persson, Member. .
Vi'cfori'a l�un,kle.
cc:. do}�-Seer3. Michael Webby Terri Shuhart
The. Finance Committee recommends concurrence.in the staff recommendation. to approve the
proposed modification in the compensation for the management positions of Deputy Fire Chief.
This proposal, if approved, will move the Deputy Fire Chiefs into the same salary grade as
Deputy Police. Chief.
The.. new labor agreement with Local 864 has resulted in salary increases, for Fire Battalion
Chiefs, which has created salary compression w th the osition. of Deputy Chief, (i e: the
difference in salary between the positions cs utrently less khan 4%). The proposal, if approved,
�
.will also result in achieving internal e46V bet een the Dleputy,Chief of the Police and Fire
departments.-10
..
Effective January 1, 2Q03, it skre�commended zo place the Fi ,e Deputy Chief position in salary
grade m45. with a in, alary range o $7! 5 $ 9J 3 Tt is reco ended that current
incumbents, Glen'G'ordon, and hur l✓arse�n he aced at ste E $8 9�3
gyp& p'
606. J.r they ro�o`used s increase`are available in the current' Funds of approximately. $10, p p ary
budget. ..
II ^
ti
King Parke, Chair.
Corr , V. i air
Don Person, Member.
cc:. Victoria Runkle Michael. Webby
Lee Wheeler Eileen Flott
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (HONEY CREEK HILL; FILE NO. LUA-02-
133FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has
heretofore been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of said final plat, and such
approval being deemed proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk
to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The final plat heretofore submitted and approved by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to
wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
(The property, consisting of approximately 2.69 acres, is located in the vicinity of
NE Sunset Blvd. and Redmond Avenue NE)
be and the same is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of
Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated January 23`d, 2003.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.965:1/28/03
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
2003.
2003.
2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 470 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTER
LINE OF THE RELOCATED SKAGIT—DIABLO—SEATTLE TRANSMISSION LINE
RIGHT —OF— WA Y,-
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 470 FEET THEREOF,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2, AS CONVEYED TO
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING
NO. 7112210128
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF REN TON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHING TON
EXHIBIT A
WOODBRIER
DWN. BY:
DATE.
JOB NO.
Lake Washington
Blvd. N.E., Suite 200
ETERSON. 4Blvd.
RSG
1/23/03
STH/-0001
CONSULTING Kirkland, WA 98033
CHKD. BY:
SCALE:
Tel (425) 827-5874
Fax (425) 822-7216
JAS
N. T.S.
�101,57- ST
NE 24TH ST
NORTH
HIGHLANDS
PARK
NE
19TH ST
NE 17TH PL
SITE
2
I2th
St
c
SUNSET
COUR
2
a
PARK
o
SE 116TH ST
0 NE LOTH ST
�
NE9THST
Z
NE 8TH ST
m
KIWANIS
NE 7TH ST
PARK
VICINITY MAP
WOODBRIER
DWN. BY.
DATE:
JOB NO.
PETERSON
4030 Lake Washington
Blvd. N.E., Suite 200
RSG
1123103
STHI-0001
CONSULTING
Kirkland, WA 98033
Tel (425) 827-5874
CHKD. BY.
SCALE:
Fax (425) 822-7216
JAS
N. T S
NF \ N
. �38.65•
z
SFj- 1 B� E26 60
1 - I
SCALE IN FEET
0 1
1 5 SQ rr.
Z 43SS SO. FT.
m a p TRACT C \
z
N 66523r IN
J 4200 4W 42.00 .O 42.
I $Q11� 15 > 14 13 , 12 a
Q I Stn 140B2 50. FT. 3112 S0. FT.
s112 So' FT. 0 3112 S0. FT. ^ n
1 �r�
�O .6 47 00' 47 W 42.00• C
S TRACT A � N 3233 w NE 14th P Q 4Z75 3L46
1 211951 $Q Ff. (PlOVATO '{ w
OW n
f ♦ I
P
J
Z 11 10 Pg g 8 o z
B27 S0. FT. 3094 S0. Fr.='31" SO. FT. 3028 SO. Fr.
1 D
,32.91 s3
5. b
Sj L^ rn 7 2 56 w se.2AT5' 3.75 p 26.25 b
1.45 c
1 N (PRIVATq
to•
wA
n
DRAINAGE EAASU T. 5 4
_CAR NO. 12• SH,
2 50. Ff. 3186 SO. FT. S 3000 S0. FT. 3003 SO. FT.
DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
O28' PRIVATE
OTY
Sr AND a g NE6/����14Vt�hay Sr— s ^
pO 16' PRIVATE 1 x a O 1 N
I ACE555 ANDN .. wY 7yii55�'� P
E VT61TY TY SMT 1 0.
O26• ESE o
A AND Z
unutt ESMr —
L4 7
2 3
I x
1— 62.s 1 a
rTRACT 54 � S0. FL 3251 S0. FT. 3025 S0. FT.
,548 S0. FT. 10' TY T.
1 — T PRONSIa1S _ �S—.EET�l-
21-N 87'S9'S6- W 246.
EAWLE T TRANSCENTMISSION
NE NE. zzs B3 WOODBRI ER
SEATn.E TRANSMISSION 11NE
FINAL PLAT
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 4-6-040.C.1, OF CHAPTER 6, STREET AND
UTILITY STANDARDS, OF . 'TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF
GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON"
BY REVISING POLICIES BY WHICH THE CITY ALLOWS
CONNECTION TO ITS SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM BY PROPERTY
OWNERS OUTSIDE OF THE CURRENT CITY LIMITS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-6-040.C.1 of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. Sewer service to properties outside the City's corporate limits will not be
permitted except under.the following conditions:
a. Public Entity: The applicant is a municipal or quasi -municipal
corporation including a school, hospital or fire district, County of King or similar public entity;
or
b. Necessary Service: Service is necessary to convert from a failed or
failing septic system or the area has been defined bythe Seattle -King County Health Department
as a health concern area; or
C. Vested Service: Those properties for which the City has granted a
valid sewer availability certificate prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 4969, which was
July 7, 2002; or
1
ORDINANCE NO.
O
d. In the City's Potential Annexation Area, Existing Legal Lot(s)
Desiring to Construct One Single -Family Residence or Connect One Existing Single -Family
Residence: The City Council may approve the connection of one existing single-family residence
or the connection to sanitary sewer for the construction of one single-family residence on an
existing legal lot. In consideration of such connection, the property owner(s) shall be required to
execute an agreement with the City requiring that any development occurring on the lot shall be
in compliance with City of Renton zoning and development standards; or
e. Outside the City's Potential Annexation Area, Existing Legal Lots
Desiring to Construct One or More Single Family Residence(s): The City Council may approve
connection of one or more single family residences or the connection to sanitary sewer for the
construction of one or more single family residences on existing legal lots, as long as the
properties to be served are connected within the sewer service area of the City or within a
Special Assessment District of the City.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
30 days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 52003.
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
AA
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1027:1 /27/03 :ma