Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 11/22/200414 AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING November 22, 2004 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE INITIATOR: Querin Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for 10.14 acres located in the vicinity of Hoquiam Ave. NE, SE 112th St., and SE 114th Pl. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Maplewood East Annexation - 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition and proposed R-4 zoning for 26.14 acres located in the vicinity of 152nd Ave. SE, 156th Ave. SE, and SE 136th St. b. Proposed City of Renton 2005 Budget 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 15, 2004. Council concur. b. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappoints Fred Kaufman as the City's Hearing Examiner for a four- year term commencing 1/31/2005 and expiring 1/31/2009. Council concur. c. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way to widen Camas Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Camas Estates Short Plat (SHP-04-039). Council concur. d. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Falk II Annexation, and recommends that a public meeting be set on 12/6/2004 to consider the petition; 6.29 acres located in the vicinity of 102nd Ave. SE and S. 50th St. Council concur. e. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits revised 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation, and recommends that a public meeting be set on 12/6/2004 to consider the petition; 25.63 acres located in the vicinity of 144th Ave. SE, SE 115th St., and 148th Ave. SE. Council concur. f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a public hearing be set on 12/6/2004 to consider the R-1 Zone community separators. Council concur. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) v g. Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommends reclassification of 18 positions, including Building Inspector/Combination, Building Inspector/Electrical, Finance Analyst III, Judicial Specialist, Golf Course Manager, Facilities Manager, Recreation Manager, Park Maintenance Manager, Secretary I (2), Assistant Human Resources Analyst (2), Executive Secretary, Librarian, Librarian Supervisor, Library Assistant I, Facilities Supervisor, and Human Resources Technician. Refer to Finance Committee. h. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to CAG-03-033, contract with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for the Strander Blvd. & SW 27th St. Connection project, for additional design work in the amount of $197,437. Approval is also sought to transfer $138,000 from the Benson Rd. & S. 31st St. Traffic Signal project and $59,437 from the Transit Priority Signal project to this project. Refer to Transportation Committee. i. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement accepting $392,947 in grant funds from Washington State Department of Transportation for the Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) Phase 1 improvements. Refer to Transportation Committee. j. Utility Systems Division submits CAG-04-096, Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $435.20, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $2,087.79 to Santana Trucking & Excavating, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. 8. CORRESPONDENCE 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Edlund/Korum Property Lease & Caretaker's Agreement with Leroy Coffman 10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 5:00 p.m. Emerging Issues Council Chambers 5:30 p.m. 2005 Budget Presentation and Deliberations * Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk * CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 22, 2004 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF DON PERSSON, Council President; TONI NELSON; DENIS LAW; TERRI COUNCILMEMBERS BRIERE; MARCIE PALMER. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS RANDY CORMAN AND DAN CLAWSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; VICTORIA RUNKLE, Finance and Information Services Administrator; FRED KAUFMAN, Hearing Examiner; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER TIM TROXEL, Police Department. SPECIAL GUEST Linnea Post, Lindbergh High School senior, participated as a job shadow of the Mayor. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Querin, Hoquiam accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave NE & SE 112th St public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent petition for the proposed Querin Annexation, consisting of 10.14 acres located in the vicinity of Hoquiam Ave. NE, SE 112th St., and SE 114th Pl. Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the subject area contains five single-family homes and four vacant parcels. The western portion of the site is relatively flat; however, Honey Creek and its ravine result in steep slopes and a high erosion area on the eastern portion of the site. Mr. Erickson recommended that surface water runoff be controlled via King County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Level 2 flow -control standards or greater. He reported that the site is served by Fire Districts #10 and #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Renton and Issaquah school districts. Mr. Erickson stated that the site's zoning under King County is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre). Since Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density, applicable zoning is R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) and R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre). Mr. Erickson reported that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with Renton annexation policies and Boundary Review Board objectives. The fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $10,479 at full development, and a one-time park development cost estimated at $32,185. He concluded that the proposed annexation appears to further City business goals and be in the best interest of the City. In response to Council President Persson's inquiry, Mr. Erickson confirmed that if annexed, the site would be served by Renton's Fire Department. November 22, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 416 Public comment was invited. Martin Kenney, 18719 Yew Way, Snohomish, 98296, reported that he owns property in the proposed annexation area. Mr. Kenney stated that it has been a pleasure talking with City staff, and he expressed his hope that future development on the annexation site will be similar to a nearby housing development. Darrell Offe, 13932 SE 159th Pl., Renton, 98058, speaking on behalf of Cambridge Homes, supported the proposed annexation and praised City Staff for their assistance with the process. Mr. Offe stated that for the Brookefield 11 Subdivision, a half -street was built that abuts the south side of the annexation area and it contains urban improvements such as water, stormwater, and sewer. Additionally, he noted the existence of a waterline to the west of the site in Hoquiam Ave. NE. Rick Finkbeiner, Cambridge Homes, 1800 NE 44th St., Renton, 98056, voiced his support for the annexation. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE , SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE QUERIN 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION, AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, WHICH REQUIRES THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND REQUIRES THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Maplewood East, accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the SE 136th St & 156th Ave SE public hearing to consider the 60% Notice of Intent petition to annex and R-4 zoning for the proposed Maplewood East Annexation for 26.14 acres, including the abutting SE 136th St. right-of-way, bounded by 152nd Ave. SE and the City limits on the west, 156th Ave. SE on the east, SE 136th St. on the south, and the Willowbrook Subdivision on the north. Don Erickson, Senior Planner, reported that the 60% petition was certified by King County on 9/13/2004, and the SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) rezoning site review was completed with a determination of non -significance on l l/l/2004. In regards to the current site conditions, he noted the existence of eight single-family dwellings and a seven percent downward slope from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. Reviewing the public services, Mr. Erickson stated that Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Renton School District serve the site. Continuing, Mr. Erickson said existing King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre). Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Residential Low Density, for which R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. He indicated that the fiscal impact analysis reveals a surplus of $6,515 at full development, assuming a potential of 78 single-family November 22, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes 417 homes and an assessed home value of $400,000. Mr. Erickson also noted the estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost of $32,185. Mr. Erickson concluded by saying the annexation proposal serves the best interests and general welfare of the City, is generally consistent with City polices and Boundary Review Board objectives, and furthers City business goals. Noting some potential flooding in the area, he suggested mitigation with future development. Public comment was invited. Kristy Hill, 13527 156th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, expressed concern about the future development of the annexation site, and requested that an environmental impact study and a traffic study be conducted. Michael Fichtenholtz, 15323 SE 133rd Ct., Renton, 98059, opposed the proposed annexation, saying that it is the only green site left in the neighborhood. Voicing concern about the increase in traffic on 156th Ave. SE, he requested a traffic study as well as an environmental impact study. Tamara Larrigan, 4111 SE 1st Pl., Renton, 98059, reported that she is working with the Renton School District site -based council for overcrowded schools. She stated that schools in the annexation area are overcrowded, and noted that the Issaquah School District assesses a school impact fee. Ms. Larrigan expressed concern that children are being bussed farther away from neighborhood schools. She asked Council to consider this situation when reviewing the impacts of new housing developments. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that Council has no jurisdiction over the Renton School District; however, impacts are considered when making land use decisions. She suggested that Ms. Larrigan address her concerns to the Renton School Board. In response to Councilwoman Palmer's comments regarding the City's role in the implementation of a school impact fee, City Attorney Larry Warren confirmed that the Renton School District does not meet the State criteria for establishing a mitigation fee. He explained that if the school district did meet the criteria, the City Council makes the ultimate decision as to whether or not to allow the fee. The Council also establishes the amount of the impact fee. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX FOR THE MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION, AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD AND PREPARE A R-4 ZONING ORDINANCE AND AN ANNEXATION ORDINANCE FOR FUTURE COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Budget: 2005 Annual City of This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Renton accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider the City of Renton 2005 Budget. Victoria Runkle, Finance and Information Services Administrator, pointed out that the proposed budget amount of $149,392,500 and the General November 22, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 418 Governmental Funds amount of $69,106,300 have been changed. The changes include: • Moving firefighter retiree monies 'm the amount of $260,000 from the General Fund to Fund 522 (this does not change the total Budget amount); • Reducing the capital budget in the Community Services/Park fund by $158,300. The capital needs for the aquatic center were budgeted both in the General Fund and the Capital Improvement Program Fund; • Adding $35,000 for the Kennydale Beach lifeguards; and • Adding a code compliance officer to the Police Department to meet the first element of the REACT program in the amount of $80,000. In conclusion, Ms. Runkle stated that the total recommended 2005 Budget as of today is $149,349,200, with the General Government Funds totaling $68,803,000. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted included: • The Winter/Spring Recreation Brochure will be available on December 1st at the Community Center and local libraries. New programs offered include drama classes, Snow Shredder's Ski School, introduction to cross country skiing, and new cardio classes. • The Information Services Division recently donated the City's outdated computers to the Renton Community GEAR UP Project's loaner computer program at Renton High School. • The Transportation Improvement Board approved a $2,208,000 grant for the Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) project. This is needed funding for Phase 2 of the project, which will construct all of the additional improvements between I-405 and the eastern limits of the Stoneway property, including the improvements to the I-405 access ramps. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of the Administration, item 7.f. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 15, 2004. Council concur. November 15, 2004 Hearing Examiner: Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappointed Fred Kaufman as the City's Hearing Appointment Examiner for a four-year term commencing 1/31/2005 and expiring 1/31/2009. Council concur. Development Services: Camas Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Estates Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way to widen Camas Ave. NE to fulfill a Dedication, Camas Ave NE requirement of the Camas Estates Short Plat (SHP-04-039). Council concur. November 22, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 419 Annexation: Falk 11, 102nd Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave SE & S 50th St submitted 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Falk II Annexation, and recommended that a public meeting be set on 12/6/2004 to consider the petition; 6.29 acres located in the vicinity of 102nd Ave. SE and S. 50th St. Council concur. Annexation: Wedgewood Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department . Lane, Jericho Ave NE submitted revised 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation, and recommended that a public meeting be set on 12/6/2004 to consider the petition; 25.63 acres located in the vicinity of Jericho Ave. SE, SE 115th St., and 148th Ave. SE. Council concur. Human Resources: Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended Reclassification of 18 reclassification of 18 positions, including Building Inspector/Combination, Positions Building Inspector/Electrical, Finance Analyst III, Judicial Specialist, Golf Course Manager, Facilities Manager, Recreation Manager, Park Maintenance Manager, Secretary I (2), Assistant Human Resources Analyst (2), Executive Secretary, Librarian, Library Supervisor, Library Assistant I, Facilities Supervisor, and Human Resources Technician. Refer to Finance Committee. CAG: 03-033, Strander Blvd Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Supplemental Extension Design, Perteet Agreement No. 1 to CAG-03-033, contract with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for Engineering the Strander Blvd. and SW 27th St. Connection Project, for additional design work in the amount of $197,437. Approval was also sought to transfer $138,000 from the Benson Rd. & S. 31st St. Traffic Signal Project and $59,437 from the Transit Priority Signal Project to this project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. . Transportation: Maple Valley Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement Hwy Phase 1 Improvements, accepting $392,947 in grant funds from Washington State Department of WSDOT Grant Transportation for the Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Phase 1 Improvements. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 04-096, Maplewood Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-04-096, Maplewood Creek Sediment Creek Sediment Basin Basin 2004 Maintenance; and requested approval of the project, authorization Maintenance, Santana for final pay estimate in the amount of $435.20, commencement of 60-day lien Trucking & Excavating period, and release of retained amount of $2,087.79 to Santana Trucking & Excavating, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 71 FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Item 7.L recommended a public hearing be set on ' 2�OT 12/13/2004 to consider the Planning: R-1 Zone R-1 Zone community separators. Council concur. Community Separators MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 7.f. AS AMENDED TO CHANGE THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO 12/ 13/2004. CARRIED. November 22, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 420 UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Vice Chair Law presented a report recommending approval Finance Committee of Claim Vouchers 232026 - 232509 and three wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $2,414,274.20; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 54437 - 54656, one wire transfer, and 569 direct deposits totaling $1,791,478.80. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services: Finance Corrnnittee Vice Chair Law presented a report recommending Edlund/Korum Property Lease concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the three-year lease and & Caretaker Agreement, Leroy caretaker's agreement with Leroy Coffman for the City -owned Edlund property Coffman house located on City property at 17611 103rd Ave. SE. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City lerk be authorized to sign the lease and caretaker's agreement. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Nelson reviewed Renton School District announcements and School District: Activities activities, which included: scholarship awards; state swimming and cross country championship results; the launch of a parent volunteer program at McKnight Middle School; the Reading Buddies program at Dimmitt Middle School; and the Renton Rotary selections for Teachers of the Month. Hearing Examiner: Congratulating Fred Kaufman on his reappointment as Renton's Hearing Appointment Examiner, Council President Persson stated that he does an outstanding job. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time:/ 8:�31 Jp.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann November 22, 2004 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 22, 2004 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/29 No Meeting (5th Monday) (Persson) MON., 12/06 Emerging Issues 6:00 p.m. *Council Conference Room Approximately 2005 Budget Deliberations; 6:30 p.m. Pavilion Building Update; 2005 Legislative Priorities *Council Chambers* COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES MON., 12/06 2005 Council Committee Assignments (Briere) 5:00 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Corman) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 12/02 R-1 Zone Community Separators; (Briere) 2:00 p.m. Airport Noise Mitigation PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 12/06 Emergency Services Radio Reception (Law) 5:30 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 12/02 Strander Blvd./SW 27th St. Connection (Palmer) 3:30 p.m. Supplemental Agreement; WSDOT Grant Agreement for Maple Valley Hwy. Phase 1 Improvements UTILITIES (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. ,,,-.,y of Renton Current Annexations - URBAN GROWTH WUNDARI - crry LIMITS CURRENT ANNEXATION INALTIVEANNEXATION Vt . 1co, ni.ni ,I-,,,,.Neighbohoods&SlmtegicPlannkig G. W R— 'ADDroved by the B.R.B. 13 I A ney Creek Last jCASTL r 27.5 ac. 'K U-1 Merritt 1��- 133.3 ac. o Hendrickson 23.1 ac. I R -J Querin 9.4 ac. Johnson & 60)15.9 ac. Park Terrace I 7.6 ac. 01 Mosier 11 31.0 ac. Falk 11 6.8 ac. Anthone' 4.9 ac. Maplewood !-"Iementary' 9.8 ac. W Lane 24.0 ac. Anderson -7--ld 19.8 ac. Maplewood East 26.1 ac. Maplewood LT'_�77 Highlands ► 9.5 ac. v QUERIN ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF NNOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS November 22, 2004 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property owners in the proposed Querin Annexation area representing approximately 16% of the area's $1,299,000 assessed value. The King County Department of Assessments certified the signatures on the petition on October 11, 2004. The 10.14-acre site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is primarily designated as Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site currently has King County R-4 zoning, which allows up to six units per gross acre. It is the City's intent to rezone it to R-8, eight units per net acre, consistent with the RS land use designation if the Council eventually accepts a 60% Direct Petition to Annex for this site. With R-8 zoning the site would accommodate approximately 47 single-family detached dwelling units. There currently are five detached dwellings on it. The annexation site abuts the City on its western and southern boundary. The Hendrickson Annexation site borders it on the north. No existing public right-of-ways are proposed to be included in this annexation. The site is relatively flat where it abuts Hoquiam Avenue NE but fall off to the east where Honey Creek traverses it. The eastern part of the site is considered to in a high erosion area. Under RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing either at least 10% of the annexation areas assessed value. The current Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation petition has signatures representing at least 16% of the area's assessed value. Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting with the applicants in order to decide whether the City wishes to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will: 1. Authorize the circulation a 60% Direct Petition to Annex: 2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and, 3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's existing indebtedness. Council Hearing Handout 08-04-03.doc\ Q W a 0 N■t`SHIERM' MV.SrI04th St, fflE�;�'P, I i1 w �� • ■��lilfL'[A�7T Chi ��� 11111111 Q 0 In 0 ,tl t � w 0 7 E 6 th N This document is graphic a mtotion, not quoronte d S o : rvey ocarocy, t'n%edr for city porn ly o d bored on the best nformotion owtlob a as of lfie dale shown. This map is for display purposes onfy. Querin Annexation 0 800 1600 Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1 : 9600 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — Revlon City Limits Alex Pietsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario O Proposed Annexation Area �t�NTO$ 26 October 2004 Querin Annexation Public Meeting November 22, 2004 Existing Conditions n PAA — Within Renton's Potential Annexation Area © Location - Between Hoquiam Avenue NE on the west and Honey Creek Estates on the east, immediately south of proposed Hendrickson Annexation Size — 10.14-acres Natural Features —Western portion of site is relatively flat whereas eastern portion is much steeper dropping off into Honey Creek zi Existing Land Use — 5 existing single-family homes and 4 vacant parcels o Boundaries — as shown on next slide Existing Conditions - Structures Five existing SF dwellings Vicinity Existing Conditions - Topography Up to 33% slopes on eastern half of site Structures Map IMP-11111 `MI Topography Map a X cn o ;1 Sr s o (n C a ?1 .y. 7 o 2 S y (n N _3 m C:3 D 2 m G a w o CD m r\ 0 c U D Q c m d a QL 3 CD I N o v? A F Ci C zN b 0 cn L cr un ✓ Vl ro CD 't ``^V zx L O` l. l 4Y �. � ��`4e�:anns++...ea.• .•.4r �F, ; 5�vP m x•Fn rl X ._+: (D N .. (D cn• M O U) o o0C C a. N. N O < . v 30N- 0 =, . m z` vcD3 @ @ fD oID l ^ J CL cL O fDO CO (D N O C N O 0 N � — (D a) 0) N p N CD o w `° CD 3 a ch ro o v o 3• �� N T. N 1 N a CQ n� O [D N O N 2 (D (D 3 (n 7 r-h 0 d 7 m N N cD (n 0 � D Q < N n -D N �. 0 90 C _6 Zo ? n CD O N CD v v CDa N �• v . v 9 a _a n ^ a rva ^ y 0 0 B cn CD ro D m C > O O a) C O a) w 3 oa�Co a N N Q. ornWa G C 0) O �"� a N a) CD �% O O tea) Y a) u) oa,o o o �� oa O.O Q� U� X 2IL W:E � > j aa) c� >A r� O y (DCL _ywUn u!m 0 E cc �Naa)) - (` C C N O a7 o Q.i•6 N a) C ONON a) 7 (6 O .0 a)00 >a Nm na @V f0 m •@�=p U .N NO "O "O > Q."a O._ Y 2cn Q a) y � � aCi C d N'«C-. v .-: a) o cn = to y t' CA -0 MOO +- m a) Q O i �' a) :« T Tor c m C'x oo ca (p C 7 0 a) 7 (A a a) 7 Y V) m m x� m w Q a) o- n m r Cl) -- (4 En U Q fl d V Q a) t a) N (1) U) c m O- C n n r < �� ��i (�6� Q a) C'j N> cL N ccm R a) c.0 m a m 3: C � L 7 d 5o 00 i-+ Ow a) O � �I �� � �I xmm ��� a) m 0--a 9 c U c�6c "O ' @Um � Ca -0 Xm 0Eti E�3� m°p=N X� a) 0) N o atom Q9.s Q- ln> ccaa0 �O 0� 0 � � c�N co N (A r-- ° o � .Z � OD a`CCni � aN) o (C1)) o a�D c- C m � � � M L CD..- C? MCa)T �' lh"'C^ C N �� C� GN O d C@ n�mx Q N mQ oto N �.0 �� ��N� �mvo -'m.y. �w �m a) (B U la) Z)o tn(� Nlf) �0 7co toff) u7E U �,m>a) E'- � gQa) Qc O•N« _ O O >. X C a >. X o U UcL_N UCa)Q. >.-O N V 7 L 3 fA (n Q co Qcfl ,�fA// <64 Q o O C a) C Z Z` f; U O _ amU Va a(U amp a do LL Cl c c [� (� 1- V m N U d n n 0 0 11 a a a)• o oa as r N c oa - co ca N@ N 7 N N O a C C 0I a) YL CN I i O O W u O 4= X p a) G a CN > Cl c_ a). `���1) Xm � CJ (� 00 COO oo r ClUo� ue t �, C a) a a) W to v) rn .s 9I c m= r C 'c 0 7 w aLL C w a E H 3 0 n a M O > M O O N n eJ o4 me o O x (D N UA n s) N -� oa) a)wc U C p d _e ,( O o d cG Z 7 p' OCL m .� m 3 c C i c N. E 7 a) N m Q% u 0 a) 23 MAPPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX WITH R-4 ZONING November 22, 2004 The City is in receipt of a 60% Direct Petition to Annex from property owners in the proposed annexation area representing over 60% of the area's assessed value (see map on back of handout). Those signing the petition also agreed to accept new zoning consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as well as assume their fair share of the City's existing outstanding indebtedness. Tonight public hearing is the first of two required for rezoning the site from the County's R-4 zone to Renton's R-4 zone upon annexation. The subject site is within the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. King County has zoned it R-4 which allows up to 6 units per gross acre compared to a maximum of 4 units per net acre under Renton's R-4 zoning. Unlike the County zoning, which allows both attached and detached units, Renton's new zoning only allows detached single-family dwelling units. Because the project has completed a 60% Direct Petition that has been certified as sufficient by King County's Department of Assessments, staff are recommending that it be vested in terms of the lot size and density provision of the R-5 zone. The R-5 zone is being phased out with the adoption of the City's new Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments implementing it. Recommendation: The Administration is asking Council: • to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the Maplewood East Annexation; • to authorize it to send the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review Board so that they can begin their mandatory 45-day review period; • to authorize it to prepare a zoning ordinance for the Maplewood East Annexation site based upon the new R-4 zone but providing for the lot size and density provisions of the R-5 zone. This zoning ordinance will be considered at second public hearing on this matter if Council decides to effectduate the annexation by ordinance; and, • to authorize it to prepare an annexation ordiance for future Council consideration if it decides to proceed with this annexation. Council Hearing Handout 11-22-04.doc\ MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION MAP / &fE - / z gGa> o —7E— $ ) 72 $ � ,\§ \ } ~ _\ m / - » . / § \ ) § / � \J \ � � / \ G / g / z ® \ fn \ t e 2 e \ C 7 CA § t \\J .2/\/ o \Z U \\ ~ 22 e§ \� 30 m3 — =c \ \ \ 2 5 7 $8 i / C n I� X cn EiEi. S J S ^.' S (� y N ry � -ryi [J o r 7 I e �n ;n �o � a o "'-•� rn � ���'� ,v•� J v 01 q ' � S .t tl J c o N N N a O N V C RS w S1 02 N y n CA � N N � � [ •b cJ N C = yw N G 00 op k. O N cJ N O N C5 v, Q r Q (n Q b � r w N G N V CI J c v : v U R m C C O v C n i!i I C7 I U I 0 I 1 i W G O � r": ; `p •.�., ®� cs N l� r U G Q % `�'� � •c //Q�� . • I.i V) V V) F>� Cc T3 �- N N Mll o 'E U �, :- U W ^ i V) V) O CCS E ,pj U r * +n U N N M N U N U V) Q I"' - �� as 2005 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 22, 2004 1. Proposed 2005 Budget = $ 149,392,500 2. Of this total, the General Governmental Funds = $ 69,106,300 3. We discovered a couple of errata a. Fire Retiree monies need to be moved from the General Fund to Fund 522. This will not change the total Budget, but will decrease the General Fund by the same amount. Decrease General Fund $ (260,000) Increase Fund 522 $ 260,000 b. The Capital needs for the pool were budgeted both in the General Fund and the CIP Fund. Reduce the capital budget in the Community Services/Park Fund $ (158,300) c. Recommend setting aside monies for the Kennydale Lifeguards to be decided after policy discussions about city-wide aquatic programs $ 35,000 d. Add a Code Compliance Officer to the Police Department to meet the first element of the REACT program. $ 80,000 TOTAL BUDGET RECOMMENDED $ 149,349,200 AS OF NOVEMBER 22, 2004 General Governmental Funds $ 68,803,000 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • The 1 lth Annual Clam Lights event will be held on Friday, December 3`d, at Coulon Beach Park. Entertainment starts at 6:30 p.m., the Official "Clam Lights" lighting takes place at 7:15 p.m., and the Parade of Boats arrives at 7:30 p.m. Co -sponsored by Ivar's Inc. and the City of Renton, this free event draws hundreds of spectators each year, and Clam Lights can be viewed through January 1" • The Annual Holiday Tree Lighting will be Saturday, December 0', at the Piazza Park from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. Sponsored by the City of Renton and Piazza Renton, this event is complete with music, cider, and Santa. For more information, call 425-228-2209. • At Coulon Beach Park, on Saturday, December 4`", the Rainier Yacht Club's lighted boat parade makes an encore appearance at 7:30 p.m. On Sunday, December 5t", the Argosy Ship arrives at 6:00 p.m., featuring entertainment by the Northwest Girls Choir. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches will be serving a free Thanksgiving Dinner for the Renton Community on November 25"' from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m., at St. Anthony's Parish Hall, 501 South Fourth Street in downtown Renton. If friends and/or family will be alone on this holiday, this would be a wonderful time to join the community and celebrate Thanksgiving. For more information, contact Marlin Olson at 425-226-3660 or 360- 349-5818. Over 140 people attended the Specialized Recreation Fall Sports Banquet on Thursday, November 18°i, at the Renton Senior Activity Center. Among those honored were seventy-seven bowlers and eight golfers, plus the many volunteers who help make the fall sports program a success. The Winter/Spring Recreation Brochure will be out Wednesday, December 1S`, and will be available at the Renton Community Center and the local libraries. Sign up for one of the 28 new programs being offered, including drama classes, Snow Shredder's Ski School, introduction to cross county skiing, and new cardio classes. FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Information Services Division recently donated the City's outdated computers to the Renton Community GEAR UP Project's loaner computer program at Renton High School. The computers are then loaded with appropriate software and loaned to School District students who do not have the resources to purchase a computer for home. Currently, they have 60 computers loaned out to students. The I.S. Division received a letter of appreciation from the GEAR UP program representative, including a thank -you letter from one of the students who was able to use one of these computers at home for the first time. PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The Transportation Improvement Board has approved a $2,208,000 grant for the SR-169 Maple Valley Highway project. This is the needed funding for Phase 2 of the project, which will construct all of the additional improvements between I405 and the eastern limits of the Stoneway property, including the improvements to the I- 405 access ramps. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: November 22, 2004 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/Mayor Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Jay Covington, CAO Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Reappointment of Fred Kaufman as Hearing Examiner Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Council Concur Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Keolker-Wheeler recommends that Fred Kaufman be reappointed as the Hearing Examiner for a four-year term ending January 31, 2009. Mr. Kaufman has served as Renton's Hearing Examiner for 25 years and has superb professional credentials. He continues to stay abreast of new and emerging laws, requirements, and standards that may impact the issues that come before him, and has taken care to inform the Administration and Council whenever there appears to be a discrepancy between the written law and the policy intent of the Council. He has helped to ensure that our hearing process is perceived as fair and impartial, overall. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council concur in the reappointment of Fred Kaufman as the City's Hearing Examiner for a four- year term commencing January 31, 2005, and ending January 31, 2009. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI;: , Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: November 22, 2004 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact... Carrie K. Olson x-7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plats. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Site Location (Vicinity Map) Information......... Hearing Examiner's Report Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other.. . Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated is approx. 500 sq. ft. (5'x 100') of additional public right-of-way, along the western boundary of Lot 1 of the short plat. In order to provide a standard roadway width and improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalks, the applicant is required to dedicate said 5' feet to widen Camas Ave NE. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the Camas Estates Short Plat, LUA04-039, and Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2004\Camas Estates SHPL 0 1 m AGNBILL.doc Re[urn Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 990507-0574 Project File #: u� �O Street Intersection: Camas Ave. N.E. And N.E. I Ith Court Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. ARCARIUS HOMES, LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGA L DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) A portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wa. SEE EXIIIBIT "A" The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. This dedication is required as a condition for development of property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Bra e . O efski for anus Homes, LLc Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that {� . Notary Seal mustk�r<ithin box— _ R (ai/ signed this instrument and A �N t acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ,. ��@�• c StOtt/ ° a �p 1 mentioned in the instrument. J"a"- :ot~10TAi�y in:U 'e "X'zz co a ' U13LIC Notary Public in and for the State of ashin ton `n� 9 6 , • � Notary (Print) A ""qn n- � My appointment expires:..., '0. —6 "r,ciJ.UUC Exhibit "A" The West Five feet (5') of the below described property. That portion of the northeast quarter of northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, defined as follows; Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section; Thence north 89°32'47" west 320.00 feet; Thence south 0°59'22" west, 218.00 feet to the point of beginning; Thence north 89°32'47" west, 296.26 feet to the east line of Edwin Dahl Road; Thence south 2°5013" west along east line of Edwin Dahl Road, 113.12 feet; Thence south 89°32'47" east, 300.00 feet; Thence north 0°58'22" east, 113.00 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Highway by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 6045611; AND TOGETHER WITH that portion, if any, conveyed by deed from the State of Washington under King County Recording Number 6104232. END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION _%LAND USE ACTION N0._CUA—??—???SHPL Land Record No. I NO-9?—???? EXHIBIT MAP City of Renton Mon. J57 -City of Renton Mon. J71 Found Cont. Mon In case - NE comer Sec, H. T23N, R5E, W.M. Found 3" Noss disk w/'X' on cent. 6/16/03 In case - 6/15/03 12th Aw. North N89'32'47"W Basis of Baring (DEED) N 89120'20' E City of Renton 1325.26' moae.125.27' City of Renton �p J.... ....._ z $ z i DETAIL CONTROL his AREA LOT 1 s. 8.498 s.f. LOT 2 e 6,200 s.f. LOT 3 - 9,546 s.f. LOT 4 e 9,230 s.0 LOT 5 x. "74 s.f. N 1 Q 1� 1 I� r U k Original Deed cornsr� II i �+-- 45.4 --•-� I, u 40.00 26.00' - z 5' to be dedicated to the 1 °w ' City of Renton with the AaCOs° and SCALE: l tesb . 30 it. 0 30, 60' PORTION OF _NE_1/4 of m LEGEND W Concrete Monument in Coae X Tack in Load or Nail k Disk O Sol rebw w/cap J23604 • Found pipe or rebor .set RR spike In asphalt existing house #1164 LOT 1 S89'32'47% (DEED) 298.26' (DEED) 284.91' cote. 50.00 LOT 3 LOT 2 recording of this Shod plot ' ' u14NJ e as Z Lot Addresses: 00 S9- f, I to be removed U ,__.__ _ -_ __ --^ �. e1p9, .., ,. Lot 1: Lot 1{{{I Chain 0 r T9freeway Lot 3: 999TTT? ;z Unit free oy rents S76si3l`fgl ls' 'tO00 h Lot 4: 99TTTTTT7 -'Is3p•00' QIS Original Deed corner �Iw Found 4'x4"cone. Hwy Mon. 8 i 1.15' eat k 0.33' south o of Colo. position. New Private Easement for Ingress, egress k utilities molntenoncs agreement: ' S",R; Q 9�a Found 4`x4'conc. Note: Now prW is axclusl" easement few ingress and rpe 4 to be created upon the ep D sale of lots shown on this shwl plat. The owners of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 shop how an I ! % Hwy mono Slo. 42400 L,jwgs 0.62' east k 0.11 South r1�( of talc. position, o' o+nership end r,spw+sibRlty for maintenance of the private access easemsnl appurtenances. ibeso malnlsnonce resP—siblille° Include the repair and Maintenance of the private access —IL! 7 a- - — - �� �� Rol roads, drainage pipes and storm water quality and/or detention facilities within the----""�-_.....-- ,W -1'---•_ -__ rosemenl, privets signage, and other Infrastructure not owned by the city of Renton or other utility ProvWsrs. Yalnlsnonce costs shall be shard "ue6y. Parking on the paving -�-$to. 44♦00 4n the access easement is prohibited. unless pavement width 4 greater than 20 loot. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE .... LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEY FOR. - filed for record this ........... day of....:-:.,20.......ot...... M This Short Plot correctly represents o survey mode by Brad gschelaki In book .......... of........at pago......... at the request of me or under my direction In conformance with the M 694J Cod Creek Pkwy SE I�lCiis�ri, �� LL er �I w� er requirements of the appropriate Slate, and County Newcastle, WA 4­ r f�................IiF.TIY, , i Statute and Ord ant In u/. ,,, 20.Q3�, .4 Wk............. Found 4'x4'x5.8' high— conc. post - 0,34' west & 0.03' South of cola posillon. LOT 4 9 . W N be removed N r LOT 5 :n .y Property as convoyed by ) P allied under King County y0> Recording No. W04232-, w.'. Found rebor w/cop f✓18094/-' SCHROETER JeLAND SURVEY PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Pa, sox 0131 Ssslx+rat ysshngton 9e062 4206) 242-6621 FAX Q06 DWN. BY low J DATE 8/5/03 I JOB NO. 430/ DATE FIELD 7/16/03 PROJECT NO.( Site Location OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Brad Olwhefski Arcarius Homes LLC 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE Newcastle, WA 98059 W91W.1yK ll► Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039, SHPL-H 1100 Block of Camas Avenue NE May 18, 2004 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 0.91 acre site into five lots intended for the development of one duplex and four new detached single-family homes. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on April 27, 2004. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 4, 2004 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, May 4, 2004, at 9:01 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, reports, staff comments; and other material pertinent to the review of the project Exhibit No. 2: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 3: Site Plan Exhibit No. 4: Tree Cutting Plan Exhibit No. 5: Street Plan and Profile Exhibit No. 6: Shamrock Preliminary Plat Plan Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May l 8, 2004 Page 2 Exhibit No. 7: Photograph showing Lukowski house, property line, and dense vegetation which has been maintained by the Lukowski's. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Nancy Weil, Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The parcel is approximately 0.91 acre, located in the R-10 Residential zone. The applicant proposes to create five lots for detached single-family residences and one duplex. An existing shed and garage on the lot are to be removed. Access to the development will be by private street along the southern property line extending east from Camas Avenue NE to NE 12'h Street. There are no critical areas on the site, therefore the short plat is exempt from SEPA. No Environmental Review mitigation measures are required. The Examiner stated that the site is adjacent to the slopes above SR 900 (Sunset Blvd.). Ms. Weil continued stating that the subject site is designated Residential Options (RO) which allows for incorporation of both single family and multi -family developments. This plat meets all requirements for the RO designation. The density for R-10 is 7-10 units with a mix of single-family and multi -family units. There are no critical areas on site, however a portion of the west side of the property will be dedicated to the Camas Avenue NE right-of- way and a private street is proposed that will serve more than three dwelling units. The net density is 7.6 dwelling units per acre. There is, however, on the lot set for the duplex, enough space for a tri-plex and in that light staff is recommending that on the plat a restriction be placed with no more than three units would be developed on that lot. Lots 2-5 are proposed for single-family residences, Lot 1 is proposed for the duplex, either flat or townhouse. As proposed, all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. Staff recommends that a restrictive covenant be placed on the face of the plat that limits construction on Lots 2-5 to single-family detached residences. Building height is limited to 2-story and 30 feet. All setback areas are required to be landscaped. No structures are proposed at this time. Compliance will be verified prior to issuance of building permits. Generally front yards separate the structure from the public right-of-way, since Lot l fronts on two public rights - of -way and contains a portion of an easement for a new private street, staff recommends that the southern property line along Lot l be assigned as the front property line. All remaining lots meet the required front yard setbacks. All lots meet remaining interior and rear yard setbacks. Each detached dwelling unit is required to provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. Compliance with parking requirements will be verified at the time of building permit review. All lots generally comply with the arrangement and access requirements of the subdivision regulations. Each of the proposed lots satisfies the minimum lot area and dimension requirements of the R-10 zone. Due to the proposal of a private street, a homeowner's association or maintenance agreement for the private street, as well as shared utilities, is recommended. The length of the private street requires an approved hammerhead turnaround. Traffic, Park and Fire mitigation fees will be required. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 3 - The vegetation on site is primarily blackberry bushes and mature deciduous trees. Twenty-three deciduous trees and three evergreen trees are proposed to be removed as part of the short plat development. There are seven trees that the applicant has indicated will be retained. It is recommended that should any of the seven trees be removed, the applicant shall be required to replace them at a 3 to 1 ratio. There are two trees, a madrona and a fir that exist within the Camas Avenue NE right-of-way. Since the trees fall within the right-of-way, they will likely be removed in order to install the required street improvements. Earthwork activities are expected to be minimal on the site, however to mitigate potential erosion measures the project must comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The neighbors to the north have claimed adverse possession to a portion of the subject property approximately six and one-half feet from the northern line of this site. At this time, no legal action is pending, and regardless of the outcome, the proposed project would continue to comply with the density, lot size and lot dimension requirements of the zone. The site is located within the Renton School District, they have indicated that they would be able to support the estimated 2.64 additional students that may be generated by this proposal. There is an existing 6-inch dead end water main in Camas Avenue NE. A water main extension and looped system will be required for this development. In addition a fire hydrant with 1,000 gallon -per -minute fire flow and a new 8-inch side sewer main with stubs to serve the proposed lots will be required. Staff recommends approval of this short plat subject to 10 conditions. Brad Olschefski, 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE, Newcastle, WA 98059 stated that it was his understanding that the lot line may need adjusting on Lot I to make the southern lot line the front access as opposed to Camas Avenue in order to make a common lot line across the private street, and provide a larger rear yard for the setback to the north. The other question he had related to the seven trees that are to be saved, which is fine, but the last sentence states that any of the trees that are removed will be replaced at a 3 to 1 ratio. He would like to see that changed to "any of the seven trees". Lastly, in regards to the Madrona and Fir trees that are on the City's right-of-way, if the street improvements and sidewalks are necessary, those trees will have to come down. The Examiner stated that Staff could possibly come up with a creative idea to make the sidewalk around the trees, but it would be up to them. Ross Radley, Attorney 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 250, Seattle, WA 98102 stated that he represents David and Jackie Lukowski of H 64 Camas Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056. He offered a photograph of the Lukowski's back yard for the record. The photograph shows the surveyed property line, which there is no objection to that. Beyond that is the northern boundary of the proposed short plat, the dense vegetation has served as a natural fence for the Lukowski's dog. The Lukowskis have lived on this property since 1991 and since that time have maintained the area from their house to the dense vegetation consistent to that of an owner. The concern, which has been expressed to the City is that nothing be required in this development that uses those six and one-half feet, there is no litigation as yet, but there is a claim that those six and one-half feet belongs to the Lukowskis. Mr. Radley further stated that he had not seen any approval by the Fire Department for the hammerhead turnaround, and would like to see something put into the record. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 4 Brad Olschefski stated that the hammerhead turnaround has been approved by the Fire Marshal and directed by him so it would work with the Fire Department's vehicles. It was further stated that they would not build anything close to the Lukowski's house, but they do deny that the Lukowski's are the owners of the property. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated the driveway for Lot 1 can be accessed off the private roadway, the standard is written that no more than 4 off -site, meaning not on Camas, in this instance. As to saving the trees on Camas, this is a dead end road, asking for a modification is a possibility that Development Services are more than welcome to work with. A path can be used, a meandering sidewalk can be used, it can be minimized all due to the fact that this is a dead end road and there are no services required on this road. There may be some limitations due to sanitary sewer connections. There is a concern about the adverse possession, because recently there have been a lot of legal ramifications on short plats, when later on it was found out that there was either adverse possession or difficulties with the agreement on surveys. Notice was given to both Mr. Olschefski and Mr. and Mrs. Lukowski that if there was any type of question, it means that everybody must sign off on the plat. There could be additional signatures required and additional delay. It was recommended that this be worked out in advance. The hammerhead does meet the standard detail, it has been reviewed and approved. Ross Radley clarified that neither the Lukowskis or Mr. Radley were ever assured by the applicant that the six and one-half feet would not be used. He would like to know what form that assurance was in. The Examiner stated that this is where it gets complicated. It's an issue for the City and at the same time it is a private land use dispute. If both parties would like to meet after the hearing, that would be appropriate. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:46 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: ] . The applicant, Brad Olschefski, filed a request for approval of a five -lot short plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 6. The subject site is located in the 1100 block of Camas Avenue NE. The subject site is located on the east side of Camas just north of Park Avenue Extension of Sunset Boulevard. Camas does not intersect Sunset Blvd but terminates as a dead-end street due to a steep slope at this location. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 5 - 7. The subject site is approximately 39,850 square feet or 0.91 acres. The site is trapezoidal and is approximately 279.91 feet wide (east to west) and ranges from approximately 100 feet to 200 feet deep. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1795 enacted in October 1959. 9. The subject site is zoned R-10 (Residential - Multiple Options). It received this classification upon annexation. The subject site was zoned R-10 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 enacted in June 1993. 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of residential uses including detached single family uses as well as lower density multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. l 1. A garage and shed are located on the subject site but will be removed if the plat is approved. 12. The slopes on the site are less than 5% downward to the east. Sensitive slopes are located immediately south of the site where Park Drive is located below the grade of the subject site. Because of the slope and the right-of-way, the applicant was required to submit a geotechnical report. That report specified some restrictions to protect the slopes and Park Avenue. Staff recommended that those conditions be attached to the development. 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into five (5) lots. The proposed Lots would range in size from 5,874 square feet to 9,230 square feet. 14. Proposed Lot l would be developed with a duplex residential structure. Proposed Lots 2 - 5 would contain detached single-family homes. 15. The proposed development of six homes would yield a density of 7.6 dwelling units per acre. This would be the result after subtracting 500 square feet that the applicant would have to dedicate for the potential widening of Camas as well as the area that would be utilized for private access (approximately 4,945 square feet). In order to protect the density limitations of the code, staff has recommended that a restriction be placed on Proposed Lots 2 - 5 allowing only a single unit detached home on each lot and on proposed Lot 1 allowing no more than a triplex. 16. As noted above, the applicant shall dedicate property along the western edge of the site along Camas Avenue. Due to the topography and slopes down to Park, Camas ends at the south boundary of the subject site. So while the site has frontage along Park, access would be impossible. Access will instead be provided by a private easement along the south property line that runs west to east from Camas and parallels Park. 17. As noted above, an easement roadway will provide access to the interior of the site. A hammerhead turnaround will be required to accommodate emergency vehicles. 18. Development of the subject site will generate approximately 2 to 3 students. The subject site is served by the Renton School District and students will be accommodated on a space available basis. 19. The subject site will be served by the City for water and sanitary sewers. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 6 21. The property owner to the north alleges that they are entitled to the northernmost 6.5 feet as a result of "adverse possession." No adjudication has occurred on the claim but it appears that the applicant is willing to work around the disputed property. Staff noted that there is sufficient property to allow larger rear yards so that if the claim were realized, the proposed lots would still meet code requirements. Staff did recommend that the situation be rectified as soon as possible as it might otherwise interfere with finalizing the plat. 22. The applicant has submitted a tree retention plan that shows seven (7) trees will be maintained. In addition, there are significant trees along the western property line. These western trees might be jeopardized by the development of standard improvements along Camas required by short plat development. Staff noted that they might be able to work around these trees since Camas basically dead -ends in this area and serves very few homes and lots. 23. The six homes will generate approximately 60 trips. The standard mitigation fee applicable to traffic would be $75.00 per new trip. 24. The development will create additional demand on City parks and recreational facilities. The City has a Parks Mitigation fee program. The fee is $530.76 for each new home. 25. The City has a fee to mitigate the impacts of new development on the Fire Department. That fee is $488.00 for each new home. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat will provide lots for predominantly detached single family homes but will accommodate a duplex building permitted in the R-10 Zone. The development will create lots and homes that provide a choice of single family or low density multiple family residences for new residents. The plat is in an area of the City in which urban services can be provided to the site. 2. The lots are as rectangular as the underlying parcel permits. The lots will meet code requirements for size no matter what the outcome of the adverse possession issue that has been raised. The private easement and hammerhead appear to provide reasonable access to the interior lots. 3. The applicant will have to dedicate appropriate land to the Camas right-of-way. It appears that while code requires certain standard improvements along Camas they might be able to accommodate the retention of some larger trees located in that area. 4. State law requires new plats to make adequate provision for roads, schools, parks and emergency services. Therefore, the applicant shall pay appropriate fees for these services based on formulas already calculated by the City. In conclusion, as conditioned, the proposed Plat is approved. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: A Fire Mitigation Fee of $488 for each new lot will be required prior to recording the final short plat. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 7 A Fire Mitigation Fee of $488 for each new lot will be required prior to recording the final short plat. 2. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 will be required for each new lot prior to recording the final short plat. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per new average daily trip will be required prior to recording the final short plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to record a restrictive covenant and place a note on the face of the plat that limits construction on Lots 2-5 to single-family detached residences. The southern property line of Lot I shall be assigned as the front property line, and a note to that effect shall be placed on the face of the plat. The applicant shall be required to receive final inspection of a demolition permit for the existing shed and garage prior to short plat recording. 7. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be established for the private street and utilities. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the subsurface soils investigation report completed by Spears Engineering & Technical Services, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division. 9. The seven trees identified "Save" on the tree cutting and land clearing plan shall be retained and protected throughout project construction pursuant to RMC section 4-4-130.H and subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. Any of the seven trees that are removed shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 to 1, subject to approval by the Development Services Division. 10. The project shall comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. IL . No more than three (3) dwelling units shall be constructed on proposed Lot 1. ORDERED THIS 181h day of May, 2004. FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS 18`h day of May, 2004 to the parties of record: Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 8 Nancy Well 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Brad Olschefski 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE Newcastle, WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. David Lukowski 1 164 Camas Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 18"' day of May, 2004 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Members, Renton Planning Commission Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Jennifer Henning, Dev. Services Janet Conklin, Dev. Services Ross Radley 13316 Fuhrman Ave. E., Ste. 250 Seattle, WA 98102 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/B1dg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Alex Pietsch, Econ. Dev. Administrator Holly Graber, Dev. Services Larry Meckling, Building Official Utilities System Division Transportation Systems Division King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 1, 2004. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be fled with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5.00 p.m., June 1, 2004 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. D4 - 5 T23N R5E E 1/2 RM—I R-8 RM-I F4 - 17 T23N R5E E 1/2 E 4 I, �Y Q 200 400 ZONING — — — — R—ton dit7 timit9 1® F,,,zoi c" 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 88 NSDOF 405 6 F3 t F?R spike CAMAS ESTATES TREE -CUTTING PLAN Most trees on site will be removed for construction. At this time A is anticipated that several trees on the north side of proposed lot #3 and at the North East comer of lot #3 and lot #5 will remain. The remainder of the trees will need to be removed to accommodate home construction. I omid high wf,.;t Af I,n asphalt phoit ;RP.OXistinq . 0 0 'i, ;("Ifl, of -(I( ' #1164 296.26(DI I))(A 1/4 3 279.91'cof(. 0 0) 42", 17P 0 nodr i)P14.6 n*,in to�� If itIT(f6le I" y7 ;37P 1) /4 4 L 01 1 1 0, tr LO locust 0 e P 7,V C tl r 0 j374 9 (,/4 4 73.8 10 1) is tar LO '1"!3PF1JCe 3 1"rylopl ./3 npl- (�, .3 ;1 7A 4 r .9 Ople X-otd- o V., `V q il 7 J,O'lA 0 R1 rna 38 rnopin 8" a of t5k inol Deed corner /,)N n, 7 o. 00 Maple Found 4%4"conc. Hwy mon.- 0, older N I? . " �;4 I.? (j) . %) ( I 1.15, east & 0. 53' South I �? O)lW�14" 15' 19 .9 - Vi iii 011 call:. pov-.itiorl. 71.9 -1 0 1_ o t 5 Found 4%4"corw. Hwy nl(g', 0.62' enst & 0.11' ;oIlth of (.0c. posilior. ' /1 ; a to. 444 00 id I 4) 9 I ound ipbor w/c,jp #180 PPP-SS-iTu !PHE -� ii..■ ■ �. alnnnuuuu �.• � \������' . OEM man I some ones an NU urluuouou■ ��� .ue.nnuruu. • �i wu.nuun.0 rnu■...n....■ ."Immulmool moms ■11............. :. ul.u.....■..■■ ■n.....■.1,■..0 . a: ulnu.■■Il..o■ c sommume man nuuuu •eeeee ME:n; M'71..1..... ►non:unl.uu ' uluuuuliu.0 ■unn:n liu. ■cu.runlueu■no . ■.....:..r111..... ■uuruuuuu■ ■.....!googol MR ...I.....■ - ....u.;u.u.... ■..0: mom u.:01■►.0.■ AmHM usalso \11....':r.I.11...11.■ \off\r\ .vuu:uuunu Z �\ ollmommolummmumms .11.......11..on on me so on no so sli..... .L.:..11....■■. r ............... . OMOMMOM mom, wasommemenon HUNFINEENEW someneflommoss ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... r,. rr: p ram. v I�j I �� l • c • POO .4mk� •ram( �1 May 18, 2004 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Brad Olschefski Arcarius Homes LLC 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE Newcastle, WA 98059 LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039, SHPL-H 1100 Block of Camas Avenue NE Subdivide an approximately 0.91 acre site into five lots intended for the development of one duplex and four new detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on April 27, 2004. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 4, 2004 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, May 4, 2004, at 9:01 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, reports, staff comments; and other material pertinent to the review of the project Exhibit No. 2: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 3: Site Plan Exhibit No. 4: Tree Cutting Plan Exhibit No. 5: Street Plan and Profile Exhibit No. 6: Shamrock Preliminary Plat Plan Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 2 Exhibit No. 7: Photograph showing Lukowski house, property line, and dense vegetation which has been maintained by the Lukowski's. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Nancy Weil, Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The parcel is approximately 0.91 acre, located in the R-10 Residential zone. The applicant proposes to create five lots for detached single-family residences and one duplex. An existing shed and garage on the lot are to be removed. Access to the development will be by private street along the southern property line extending east from Camas Avenue NE to NE 12`h Street. There are no critical areas on the site, therefore the short plat is exempt from SEPA. No Environmental Review mitigation measures are required. The Examiner stated that the site is adjacent to the slopes above SR 900 (Sunset Blvd.). Ms. Weil continued stating that the subject site is designated Residential Options (RO) which allows for incorporation of both single family and multi -family developments. This plat meets all requirements for the RO designation. The density for R-10 is 7-10 units with a mix of single-family and multi -family units. There are no critical areas on site, however a portion of the west side of the property will be dedicated to the Camas Avenue NE right-of- way and a private street is proposed that will serve more than three dwelling units. The net density is 7.6 dwelling units per acre. There is, however, on the lot set for the duplex, enough space for a tri-plex and in that light staff is recommending that on the plat a restriction be placed with no more than three units would be developed on that lot. Lots 2-5 are proposed for single-family residences, Lot 1 is proposed for the duplex, either flat or townhouse. As proposed, all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. Staff recommends that a restrictive covenant be placed on the face of the plat that limits construction on Lots 2-5 to single-family detached residences. Building height is limited to 2-story and 30 feet. All setback areas are required to be landscaped. No structures are proposed at this time. Compliance will be verified prior to issuance of building permits. Generally front yards separate the structure from the public right-of-way, since Lot I fronts on two public rights - of -way and contains a portion of an easement for a new private street, staff recommends that the southern property line along Lot I be assigned as the front property line. All remaining lots meet the required front yard setbacks. All lots meet remaining interior and rear yard setbacks. Each detached dwelling unit is required to provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. Compliance with parking requirements will be verified at the time of building permit review. All lots generally comply with the arrangement and access requirements of the subdivision regulations. Each of the proposed lots satisfies the minimum lot area and dimension requirements of the R-10 zone. Due to the proposal of a private street, a homeowner's association or maintenance agreement for the private street, as well as shared utilities, is recommended. The length of the private street requires an approved hammerhead turnaround. Traffic, Park and Fire mitigation fees will be required Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 3 - The vegetation on site is primarily blackberry bushes and mature deciduous trees. Twenty-three deciduous trees and three evergreen trees are proposed to be removed as part of the short plat development. There are seven trees that the applicant has indicated will be retained. It is recommended that should any of the seven trees be removed, the applicant shall be required to replace them at a 3 to I ratio. There are two trees, a madrona and a fir that exist within the Camas Avenue NE right-of-way. Since the trees fall within the right-of-way, they will likely be removed in order to install the required street improvements. Earthwork activities are expected to be minimal on the site, however to mitigate potential erosion measures the project must comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The neighbors to the north have claimed adverse possession to a portion of the subject property approximately six and one-half feet from the northern line of this site. At this time, no legal action is pending, and regardless of the outcome, the proposed project would continue to comply with the density, lot size and lot dimension requirements of the zone. The site is located within the Renton School District, they have indicated that they would be able to support the estimated 2.64 additional students that may be generated by this proposal. There is an existing 6-inch dead end water main in Camas Avenue NE. A water main extension and looped system will be required for this development. In addition a fire hydrant with 1,000 gallon -per -minute fire flow and a new 8-inch side sewer main with stubs to serve the proposed lots will be required. Staff recommends approval of this short plat subject to 10 conditions. Brad Olschefski, 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE, Newcastle, WA 98059 stated that it was his understanding that the lot line may need adjusting on Lot I to make the southern lot line the front access as opposed to Camas Avenue in order to make a common lot line across the private street, and provide a larger rear yard for the setback to the north. The other question he had related to the seven trees that are to be saved, which is fine, but the last sentence states that any of the trees that are removed will be replaced at a 3 to l ratio. He would like to see that changed to "any of the seven trees". Lastly, in regards to the Madrona and Fir trees that are on the City's right-of-way, if the street improvements and sidewalks are necessary, those trees will have to come down. The Examiner stated that Staff could possibly come up with a creative idea to make the sidewalk around the trees, but it would be up to them. Ross Radley, Attorney 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 250, Seattle, WA 98102 stated that he represents David and Jackie Lukowski of 1164 Camas Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056. He offered a photograph of the Lukowski's back yard for the record. The photograph shows the surveyed property line, which there is no objection to that. Beyond that is the northern boundary of the proposed short plat, the dense vegetation has served as a natural fence for the Lukowski's dog. The Lukowskis have lived on this property since 1991 and since that time have maintained the area from their house to the dense vegetation consistent to that of an owner. The concern, which has been expressed to the City is that nothing be required in this development that uses those six and one-half feet, there is no litigation as yet, but there is a claim that those six and one-half feet belongs to the Lukowskis. Mr. Radley further stated that he had not seen any approval by the Fire Department for the hammerhead turnaround, and would like to see something put into the record. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 4 Brad Olschefski stated that the hammerhead turnaround has been approved by the Fire Marshal and directed by him so it would work with the Fire Department's vehicles. It was further stated that they would not build anything close to the Lukowski's house, but they do deny that the Lukowski's are the owners of the property. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated the driveway for Lot I can be accessed off the private roadway, the standard is written that no more than 4 off -site, meaning not on Camas, in this instance. As to saving the trees on Camas, this is a dead end road, asking for a modification is a possibility that Development Services are more than welcome to work with. A path can be used, a meandering sidewalk can be used, it can be minimized all due to the fact that this is a dead end road and there are no services required on this road. There may be some limitations due to sanitary sewer connections. There is a concern about the adverse possession, because recently there have been a lot of legal ramifications on short plats, when later on it was found out that there was either adverse possession or difficulties with the agreement on surveys. Notice was given to both Mr. Olschefski and Mr. and Mrs. Lukowski that if there was any type of question, it means that everybody must sign off on the plat. There could be additional signatures required and additional delay. It was recommended that this be worked out in advance. The hammerhead does meet the standard detail, it has been reviewed and approved. Ross Radley clarified that neither the Lukowskis or Mr. Rad ley were ever assured by the applicant that the six and one-half feet would not be used. He would like to know what form that assurance was in. The Examiner stated that this is where it gets complicated. It's an issue for the City and at the same time it is a private land use dispute. If both parties would like to meet after the hearing, that would be appropriate. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:46 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, Brad Olschefski, filed a request for approval of a five -lot short plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit 41. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 6. The subject site is located in the 1100 block of Camas Avenue NE. The subject site is located on the east side of Camas just north of Park Avenue Extension of Sunset Boulevard. Camas does not intersect Sunset Blvd but terminates as a dead-end street due to a steep slope at this location. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 5 7. The subject site is approximately 39,850 square feet or 0.91 acres. The site is trapezoidal and is approximately 279.91 feet wide (east to west) and ranges from approximately 100 feet to 200 feet deep. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1795 enacted in October 1959. 9. The subject site is zoned R-10 (Residential - Multiple Options). It received this classification upon annexation. The subject site was zoned R-10 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 enacted in June 1993. 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of residential uses including detached single family uses as well as lower density multiple family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. IL A garage and shed are located on the subject site but will be removed if the plat is approved. 12. The slopes on the site are less than 5% downward to the east. Sensitive slopes are located immediately south of the site where Park Drive is located below the grade of the subject site. Because of the slope and the right-of-way, the applicant was required to submit a geotechnical report. That report specified some restrictions to protect the slopes and Park Avenue. Staff recommended that those conditions be attached to the development. 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into five (5) lots. The proposed Lots would range in size from 5,874 square feet to 9,230 square feet. 14. Proposed Lot l would be developed with a duplex residential structure. Proposed Lots 2 - 5 would contain detached single-family homes. 15. The proposed development of six homes would yield a density of 7.6 dwelling units per acre. This would be the result after subtracting 500 square feet that the applicant would have to dedicate for the potential widening of Camas as well as the area that would be utilized for private access (approximately 4,945 square feet). In order to protect the density limitations of the code, staff has recommended that a restriction be placed on Proposed Lots 2 - 5 allowing only a single unit detached home on each lot and on proposed Lot l allowing no more than a triplex. 16. As noted above, the applicant shall dedicate property along the western edge of the site along Camas Avenue. Due to the topography and slopes down to Park, Camas ends at the south boundary of the subject site. So while the site has frontage along Park, access would be impossible. Access will instead be provided by a private easement along the south property line that runs west to east from Camas and parallels Park. 17. As noted above, an easement roadway will provide access to the interior of the site. A hammerhead turnaround will be required to accommodate emergency vehicles. 18. Development of the subject site will generate approximately 2 to 3 students. The subject site is served by the Renton School District and students will be accommodated on a space available basis. 19. The subject site will be served by the City for water and sanitary sewers. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 6 21. The property owner to the north alleges that they are entitled to the northernmost 6.5 feet as a result of "adverse possession." No adjudication has occurred on the claim but it appears that the applicant is willing to work around the disputed property. Staff noted that there is sufficient property to allow larger rear yards so that if the claim were realized, the proposed lots would still meet code requirements. Staff did recommend that the situation be rectified as soon as possible as it might otherwise interfere with finalizing the plat. 22. The applicant has submitted a tree retention plan that shows seven (7) trees will be maintained. In addition, there are significant trees along the western property line. These western trees might be jeopardized by the development of standard improvements along Camas required by short plat development. Staff noted that they might be able to work around these trees since Camas basically dead -ends in this area and serves very few homes and lots. 23. The six homes will generate approximately 60 trips. The standard mitigation fee applicable to traffic would be $75.00 per new trip. 24. The development will create additional demand on City parks and recreational facilities. The City has a Parks Mitigation fee program. The fee is $530.76 for each new home. 25. The City has a fee to mitigate the impacts of new development on the Fire Department. That fee is $488.00 for each new home. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat will provide lots for predominantly detached single family homes but will accommodate a duplex building permitted in the R-10 Zone. The development will create lots and homes that provide a choice of single family or low density multiple family residences for new residents. The plat is in an area of the City in which urban services can be provided to the site. 2. The lots are as rectangular as the underlying parcel permits. The lots will meet code requirements for size no matter what the outcome of the adverse possession issue that has been raised. The private easement and hammerhead appear to provide reasonable access to the interior lots. 3. The applicant will have to dedicate appropriate land to the Camas right-of-way. It appears that while code requires certain standard improvements along Camas they might be able to accommodate the retention of some larger trees located in that area. 4. State law requires new plats to make adequate provision for roads, schools, parks and emergency services. Therefore, the applicant shall pay appropriate fees for these services based on formulas already calculated by the City. 5. In conclusion, as conditioned, the proposed Plat is approved. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: A Fire Mitigation Fee of $488 for each new lot will be required prior to recording the final short plat. Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 7 1. A Fire Mitigation Fee of $488 for each new lot will be required prior to recording the final short plat. 2. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 will be required for each new lot prior to recording the final short plat. 3. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per new average daily trip will be required prior to recording the final short plat. 4. The applicant shall be required to record a restrictive covenant and place a note on the face of the plat that limits construction on Lots 2-5 to single-family detached residences. 5. The southern property line of Lot I shall be assigned as the front property line, and a note to that effect shall be placed on the face of the plat. 6. The applicant shall be required to receive final inspection of a demolition permit for the existing shed and garage prior to short plat recording. 7. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be established for the private street and utilities. 8. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the subsurface soils investigation report completed by Spears Engineering & Technical Services, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division. 9. The seven trees identified "Save" on the tree cutting and land clearing plan shall be retained and protected throughout project construction pursuant to RMC section 4-4-130.H and subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. Any of the seven trees that are removed shall be replaced at a ratio of 3 to 1, subject to approval by the Development Services Division. 10. The project shall comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in volume I1 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. IL No more than three (3) dwelling units shall be constructed on proposed Lot 1. ORDERED THIS 18'h day of May, 2004. .Ja FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS l 8'h day of May, 2004 to the parties of record: Camas Estates Short Plat File No.: LUA-04-039 SHPL-H May 18, 2004 Page 8 Nancy Well 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Brad Olschefski 6947 Coal Creek Parkway SE Newcastle, WA 98059 Mr. & Mrs. David Lukowski 1164 Camas Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 181h day of May, 2004 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Members, Renton Planning Commission Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Jennifer Henning, Dev. Services Janet Conklin, Dev. Services Ross Radley 13316 Fuhrman Ave. E., Ste. 250 Seattle, WA 98102 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Alex Pietsch, Econ. Dev. Administrator Holly Graber, Dev. Services Larry Meckling, Building Official Utilities System Division Transportation Systems Division King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 1 OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 1, 2004. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5.00 p.m., June 1, 2004 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. D4 - 5 T23N R5E E 1/2 z Go 1; I a I RM7 RM-1 R-8 R - 17 T23N R5E E V2Sy 0 .0� ZONING — — — — Rmt.. dity U--HO 1Abo0E4 IP/MIM TSCMUCAL SMVXW 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 5-V8 )6 )d 1Iked -112" steel W'Sf)(YI 405 OFi3 set RR spike CAMAS ESTATES TREE -CUTTING PLAN Most trees on site will be removed for construction. At this time it is anticipated that several trees on the north side of proposed lot #3 and at the North East corner of lot #3 and lot #5 will remain. The remainder'of the trees will need to be removed to accommodate home construction. / in ospholt rxistinr .. I Al ,j o 1 nodrc u) r r S �v, br � rn )) I rs )1` r s' 1 'spn)ce 4 `) I (nnul 4"a4••x').')' high J� 0 0 i, ;nu)h of rolr )u••iho') house 296.26' (DI 10) er)vC...: C)' i7',').`) r 74.9 rq • i'74:3 4,' l - -- 279.91'cofc:. t, edn. .Sli"rnd IP' c).. 12' & Os) l r.),.,•)aple.� �) 74.6 u ) M ) r ° ,S> i e 'fir'.;) ') { 7n �) \ r uC) / 7 'iTc)plr. J q \ a LO IOCUSt i.74 ) r'14 A '7;3.f1 31"n)opl i„ rnople I l Ot,1°\ 4 °S fir C> 1 , � \ r j tihe•rl• t••4Y '12�4t ?71 I `) tQ' Wcedor ) J'o zigcj.ryr � t>1 t 9P •0 i 7m <?N __..[i' .58 mnpl� a cs 6" 8"o ^ .�.. RR o) not peed corner _ (2)9' ° in Ht°� lder ) ..; mople yl})rnp �D ;u Found 4%4"con(:. Hwy rnonold r / , 1.15' enst & 0.:53' south UI cote:. posit4)n. 71.9 c"�) P69.-1 1 �) Found 4"x4"Cone:. llwy m(,n! , )1) 0.62* Bost & 0.11' ;mutt) .. of (afe. position. m )to. 44400 ' 3 \ I ound rebor w/cr)p #1809/' 1/ - .. ••:�...�.11���tR1•■����.��iiic��i�rwdi��•rdsi .Ilrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrYrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.rrrrrrrrrrr 111110 rurrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrnrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrr■r�ar�■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rllrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrllrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr6.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr�e•■■■■e.■■rrrrr�rrrur��r��rrr�rr���rrrr.rrrrr■■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 111110 rirrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..�� :..�___=---•...rrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rnrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■.:�o_ee■■■rrrrrr.�:_ �..■rrr■rrr rrrr■■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ■irrrrrrrrrrr.rrrrrrrrrurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■:��_ e.rrr■..=���;.�r:�..rrrrrrrrrrrrrr ■Irrrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrl�•••.•...................■�11 r■rrrrrllrrrrrr!r■6L!!!!m■rrrr • ..r■■...■■■..■■....■.■.........■■..■���...����■■�■.■.■■.■1.■..■..■■.■..■■■■■rr■ '■Irrrrrrrrrrrr■■rrrrrrri�rrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrr■rrua■rrrrr•1mrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr . . . rlrr■rrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrru■■■:rrr■rrrrrr■rrrrrrrrr•Irl■rrrr■.1r■rr■■rMEMORMEMEMEEME rrrrrr■■rrrrrrr y�uuoruur■uuaurruur■r _ _ __ ���uruuuuuuuuu r�..�'r_a.Y_rs_r_��_�����_�--i•.•--._—...-. rrrrr■rrr=rr■r■r•:■Ilr.■..._■ r�'-�C-i-�--�....■■.■■■rrrr\�■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl�rl�IrrrrrL■■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr IHIM m CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL submitting Data: Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Dept/Div/Board.. Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (#6581) Subject: PROPOSED ANNEXATION Falk II Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent Exhibits: Issue Paper 10% Notice of Intent Petition King County Certification Document Al #: For Agenda November 22.2004 Agenda Status Consent ............. Public Hearing Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... X X Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent petition to initiate a direct petition annexation for approximately 6.29 acres abutting the Falk I Annexation on the north and City limits on the west and 102nd Avenue SE on the east. When the Falk Annexation was originally heard it was agreed to split it into two annexations with the understanding that the City would consider the smaller (less than 10-acres) annexation in the future. Under state law (RCW 35.A.14.120) the Council must set a date not later than 60 days after the filing of the request, for a meeting with the initiating parties to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. City staff has reviewed the 10% Notice of Intent Petition and no major issues have been raised. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set December 6, 2004 for a public meeting with the proponents on the proposed Falk II Annexation to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition for the Falk II Annexation. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk 11\10% AGENDA BILL.doc/ CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President City Council Members VIA: ' OLO Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Pvyv Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (X-6581) SUBJECT: Falk II Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition to annex about 6.29 acres to the City of Renton by direct petition (see Figure 1). State law requires that the Council hold a Public Meeting with annexation proponents to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposal. The Council also decides whether to require the assumption of existing indebtedness and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan upon potential annexation. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the 10% Notice of Intent petition. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration recommends that Council take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120). • Accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition, however, modifying the annexation site to include the abutting 102°a Avenue SE street right-of-way; • Authorize the circulation of a 60%Direct Petition to Annex for the enlarged annexation site with the following provisions: ■ That property owners within the annexation area shall support the adoption of future City zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map upon annexation; and, ■ That property owners within the annexation area shall assume a proportional share of the City's existing outstanding indebtedness. Fall II Annexation — 10% Notice of Intent Issue Paper November 10, 2004 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Location: The subject area is bounded on the north and west by existing city limits, on the east by the western edge of the 102°d Avenue SE right-of-way, and on the south by South 50"' Street. Assessed Value: The assessed value at current development is $1,221,000. Natural Features: The subject site generally flat but slopes gradually towards the north. The southwestern portion of the site has steeper slopes as does the northeastern corner (see Figure 3). Existing Land Uses: Most of the subject annexation site remains underdeveloped. There currently are five single-family detached residents spread over the 6.29 acres for an average density of less one unit per acre Existingzoning: The subject site is currently zoned R-1 by King County, although properties along the east side of 102nd Avenue SE are zoned R-8 by King County. . Public Services: Natural Features: The subject site generally flat with a gradual slope to the north. The southwestern portion of the site has steeper slopes (Figure 3). Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation site as Residential Single Family with either R-8 or RMH zoning allowed. R-8 allows a base density of eight units per net acre and RMH zoning is for manufactured housing developments. Staff is recommending R-8 zoning for this annexation if the Council authorizes circulation of the 60% Petition to Annex and the applicants are successful in obtaining the signatures of property owners representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. 2. Public Services: No impediments to service delivery or unusual costs were noted by responding departments and divisions. Water Utility: The subject area is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. By agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan, Soos Creek Water and Sewer Utility is the designated service provider for this area. A certification of water availability from the District will be required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following its annexation to the City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system will also be required for new development in the annexed area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic water service. Sewers: The area currently is not served by sewer. The annexation area is located within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. Sewers could be extended either by developer extension or local improvement district. Parks: There are two park facilities within three fourths of a mile of the annexation area. One is Springbrook Park, located within the City and the other is the Cleveland Park site (undeveloped) and outside of the City near SE 196`h Street and Talbot Road South. The Community Services Department notes a deficiency in developed parks in the area. The prorated one-time cost of acquiring and developing parks for the projected 100 future residents of this annexation at build out in ten years is an estimated $68,379. 10% Issue Paper.doc Fall II Annexation — 10% Notice of Intent Issue Paper November 10, 2004 Page 3 Fire: The area is currently served by Fire District No. 40. Upon annexation the City will be the service provider for this area. Public Works Maintenance: Maintenance staff has noted no infrastructure issues at the current level of development. Surface Water: Surface Water Utility staff note that any new construction that would occur as a result of this proposed annexation should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual, Level 2 Flow Control Storm Water and Water Quality Standards. An inventory of existing drainage infrastructure within the proposed annexation area will also need to be conducted to better assess the financial impact of the proposed annexation to the City. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: (Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject annexation site is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is within an area seeing increased development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-379). Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for this area is Residential Single Family, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre. Renton is the logical service provider of most urban services and infrastructure for this area (Policy LU- 383). Policy LU-388 states that in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the city limits along approximately 50% of its perimeter. Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be "readily identifiable in the field". The proposal follows lot lines along its northern and eastern boundaries and existing parcels on its western and southern boundaries. There are no alternative boundaries to the south that would be more consistent with this policy, without substantially increasing the size of the proposed annexation. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed annexation follows lot lines on two sides, city boundaries on two sides, and streets on two sides. No alternative physical boundaries exist in the vicinity. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; With the exception of water and sewer service provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the city is capable of providing all urban services to the proposed annexation area. The City currently serves the area north of South 49`" Street and west of the proposed annexation. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposed annexation has regular boundaries and is rectangular in shape. 10% Issue Paper.doc Fall II Annexation — 10% Notice of Intent Issue Paper November 10, 2004 Page 4 e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; Neither the existing City boundary nor the proposed new boundaries are impractical. h. Incorporation as cities or town or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; This area is designated for urban development in that it is located within King County's Urban Growth Boundary. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Falk Annexation area are rural or designated for long- term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. As noted above, the King County Comprehensive Plan currently designates this area as Greenbelt/Urban Separator. CONCLUSION: The proposed Falk II Annexation appears to be in the public interest. Relevant City Comprehensive Plan Land Use policies are complied with and it appears to be consistent with relevant City of Renton Business Goals. It also appears to comply with all relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing staff has not identified any major pitfalls to this proposed future annexation although parks acquisition and development could result in an estimated one-time cost of $68,379 to the City. At full development the net annual fiscal impact to the City would be an estimated $3,851, in today's dollars cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Don Erickson l0% Issue Paper.doc r --0 0 n h St S 171th roposed Falk II Annexation Figure 1: Vicinity Map ..Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — — City Limits � RAdminAdministratorG. I)cl 0 Proposed Annex. Area G. Rosario AN.TO 10 November 2004 IN th WE IE .EN 0 600 1200 1 : 7200 a� Q oo w MY 0 *oposed Falk II Annexation Figure 2: Aerial Map �ZY �,t, Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — City Limits ®$ Alex l Ros r Adminisrtamr Proposed Annex. Area G. Del Rosario L'N.tO 10 November 2004 1 : 2400 O Q Ooposed Falk II Annexation Figure 3: Existing Structures Map Structure Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — -- — City Limits ®Z Alex Rh, Administrator G. Dell Rososari0 Proposed Annex. Area o L f0 10 November 2004 D D 0 0 200 400 1 : 2400 ci 120.51 19.22 X 120.52 — 121.41 \ X -- -- 121.39 — X . \ 4 122. 2 121.05 122.68 X 123.57 22.47 L X 123.39 124. 5 X i I � I I 124.20 I X j X / 123.37 I / / 123. 9 X 124.40 \ . X J 1-2 .04 l 124.7 124. 2 I 124. 0 XX. IX12: / 122.73 i l i X 1251 3 \ i0.88�. 124.32 124. 8 i X21.33 (' 122.63 �I X I 1 i 125.53 124.27 1 X \ �A 125.83 X 12 .67 73— X ( 122.88 1� I X l , 125.0 rop osed Falk II Annexation 0 100 200 Figure 4: Topography Map 1m Interval Contours 1 1 1� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — — City Limits 1 1 200 ®� Alex Rosartsch, Administrator Proposed Annex. Area G. f>cl Rosario �AN'IO 10 November 2004 FALK 11 ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET ................... ................... Reveny"es CQ$f € ................... Units Population AV Existing dev. 5 13 $1,221,000 Full dev. 40 100 $15,800,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household $300,000 AV/Existing DU $400,000 AV/New DU Existing Full Rate Re ular levy $3,858 $49,928 3.16 Excesslevy $108 $1,401 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate(per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $45.76 $352.00 Liquor Board profits $5.04 $65.52 $504.00 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $187.98 $1,446.00 Fuel tax - arterials $6.47 $84.11 $647.00 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.36 $4.68 $36.00 Total $388.05 $2,985.00 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $531.18 $4,086.00 Utility tax** $133.20 $666.00 $5,328.00 Fines & forfeits* $18.33 $238.29 $1,833.00 Total $1,435.477 $11,247.00 * Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.23 $2.95 $22.70 Public Defender $3.13 $40.74 $313.40 Jail $7.19 $93.50 $719.20 Subtotal $137.19 $1,055.30 Court/legal/admin. $57.08 $742.04 $5,708.00 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $193.70 $1,490.00 Police $270.00 $3,510.00 $27,000.00 Road maintenance** N/A $500.00 $6,706 Fire*** $1.25 $1,526.25 $19,750.00 Total $6,609.18 $61,709.30 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) C3iftiij tcists' Parks acquisition &development (from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: Total revenues Existing ' ! '$7Q# Full $t5506 Total ongoing costs Existing Full [ $ 'i TQ .. Net fiscal impact ................... Existing Full $18h7 $68,379.00 Total one-time costs:$fi$79 0` Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo NAME OF L PROPONENT: ADDRESS OF PROPONENT:_1)2 o-W 1✓E- 13Q4,11UF, 1/41-4 PHONE NUMBER OF PROPONENT: o2�1p'' ,4-oq oo.,7 CITY OF Piz Ot, l t 4 'Y Pr ry Y ;L. ''FF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION — f �1/( 07 ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 10-14-04 The City Council of the City of Renton City Hall 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Request to annex King County property owned by Robert W. Ruddell and Kolin B. Taylor, Et. Al. and other contiguous properties. Dear Council Members, Robert W. Ruddell and Kolin B. Taylor, Et. Al. are interested in annexing into the City of Renton approximately 6.19 acres into the City of Renton: The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the land area which we now desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. (please see attached exhibit `B") The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. Please review the attached map and the associated legal descriptions with this submittal to verify land area etc. Further, please contact me at the number below, with further questions, comments, or actions we need to take in order to move this annexation request forward. Sincerely, urtis G. Sc`�fuster Mbl. # 206-261-2112 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the fling of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10% Notice of Intent.doc\OD 44b WE � A9t � r , w 4FIRAwrl ;&WNW- �o A �a;ra :� .�aa�: af•fa ac 98 Ot0 OTA 0!0 NT a afTN 47TK AT to _ Amy- R t $ A ; !7CIA...�........� �BdfETii Inds' �giS'tl9�' o: i" ea ae=fe a' so, f».4 45,11 I user LOT, y ++ i A ' TWITAi. L tw0�R1 Li + e 94D4Wd' OOA ell =.77 , f . R 4s KOALA l9AL001 R f.n � m . � 9 eA 1NIf a� 14 n aaaAs ^;onfso RKe usw n TRA ea r.af et A "10 wis a so � u � !P . 41B R aoErofal Las I � nn1 7fur 7m. Isso ivA f.a$ .t n x eau A Weer E too" 6 e R fa' not A emo °'eo wau tafase 9 w-os.e1 e w tRo' e. g R ,a P efai n a -ef-n a bP 'ow1 f�,� .�• ,j� �,yyp t P > Aya'P ` 1r.f1 N .{! A aElU 4wa1rm !! p! a0 071 nw1 MiM ), ; lOf6 _ t1Ai e�Qp ~L'P' fnfr AIaI anoi , fawn ° at�P ;n awf9il* r awal "►'�'f a0n •4� ')i � a7011 A �0 ffel ne•.�'�7a891 a.1 N er•aa a Ine41 fwfN 9a wo it P A nu r KC LLJ L240141 9905370939 t •�� � '$.�° ,�y�b,� saa Q+ _ twat ip t e fever ff. If KC 4 MOM 9 MUM As d It► n•ao tP moae0e�r 1,a4 1 P ``\ ,/ ,^DewoA. TR.A aqe aDw IOO Ow71fer —.2Z. tts to ei fo�iaw I o.ao ! aaou °•di A. C e a+� ;ee- 0 "Moda '�,P P �tr'e'eejy SP 3,< m.w if1 en.r. Moo s � 1" S B ^�iE. .1l: A so so ��P � fawn= A S 'Ao+E a .Ea 1Dw A i ffun f.o•, - y$ 101 Hiaa007li P ,• P wme II !Z �oP 4 s�,P y� 9 Pf� + 'P A a 'aFp•OI' Y KC 9LR AOSMOS97 a�4 Iawa of � �� � 7 { fie" Tps� 'p�,f" p I A A�bqy� � 9'ia3f fteof '„ ' DATEO' 7-99 ._flt Lase aY) i A�laaae- aewr Ims" aefn ydaef0 a tl f 1, r• at0 Y' ����w a NOP6 e�iiiE P aen. ow cm•A 90 P nx M iti _ 'OP w°fe —� to LOT a '{i� 1 t7,NK L+ W07YM rL k R IOCdrAAfOt mnaRa°' 284140 P ..1 �— aft 'o`er P 6 P � P :, i9^ � �p tl �w I.ee Lbj ewar 'N .` . q•E.-.. ,p{.aya;, , F"'REDR1 KS PLACE. .,f.. ,,dd ' ' ` s u °' . f.».t f.ea. tOT1 'Q'' Y.." I 3 �• IVNISM er � 'mweu mo• ffel attu � �a Arlf.� P,A a! IE�f0�iR7. {y��° All. n-4f-g�l.° `wnf___- psp 001D + cm C KCAVA,�WOiµ P pe Y A1,Qj�1A009 B„¢e �8$ Sff �.. R A e e• • a LOT!%. .�I,g• p q tA.it9TM 9G 1 q, ^ LOT 4�i'Sje� �'} 1 ewa 'N' ww aFWar "a In n° � IUN6.- m lOT __- 108. .. .._ ... •P'11 - Tll•' _,r R a �� a a.e �� !o �^ 10 - D �^'l\�.11° . ;�i A � VT� ' e1,. 7 627.OD ,• r r ]D 5-P. 675086 1.91Ac® 1 , -- - m� w0 w> 13 12 11 e •ISE_-Ib� (2) 4.91Ac. 6tL so mnos" 1•- N �v ,sex Q%�x.J?s sO0 n _ s¢ co 4OroTjS16I5 2 -_ca' te 4 Ac. � L 10 °3 o b1 S.E. 185TH �1, �i i 6. s sS.E. Flak, v Wy wa) we we tAe s7?z ; 9 r?I h d� ti1S kt AtK7 r76 �- !84®1 I� 0f 2 ( 3 4 5 e .x 7 t 6 , ^�`� a12 i3 r, s,J •- 8 - W ,¢ = L so to r U) t G D.41AC. �� I 2s,3 4 5 26 7 B .��I °qU- u,4wnrS - �I� >s 18 6PE 2.61 A.C. © t $ g 4, s 1 t: f7/ .. 230 y sr 7T - 1 w 3> sl ,• 2 7 r IS 447 7S.E. 186TH T 9 "�01os. �� Js4t l0In 1- 7— - 6)i46 .45 AC. �7 TR. C�63 T ; ! h Jta.s x r .e' IBA ry. Tsm7 ;Y a ^_ 8 97 ' . ' - j s TRa 6t ', 5 tom p� -TRACT A is xu sl 'r - O _ ^ 60 21 'J I01 sy F,R W 22 9`� nSEtgg7TR ST . 46 ^I, 4T 8 59 4 ° •�� I sal m e.:. \3 TRACT f 1.84Ac. ---- 0.92 Ac" + 9 s 49t { 58 bsr 5,c- . - qu a t - 1) 2 13�i y 14 ' J\'ae m rls G! +mJ,6 � 3 l81 ° I fA i _ so u V L `x n Y _"w 1^ j4►` noon 1.07 Ac. 1w�6 ------e3615- 67615 fJ [ss.m A 8 V C eo e -- o as i � 44 ,.e, H ;i >C 25 y y� ~ la 29 (2) 43 K i^ 53 54 � ss � 5 2. 30 M� �^ TRACT a 42 , b S.E. a 187TH- :PL`.- "s S.w01 P- 683076 - W '' (2) - i 241>' t� is3t 1i36 „ �� 7t i^ 91 J4 �^ 3J°i\ til 39 Je 353D5.86 4 i, leso• iCO: a le, nn - xJ nk Ss 3HJS E> ti ' b61 i53.5 ra sn 188Y7 r sc514 _ abis as S.E. T ST. � 9 s.r• 13) t2) oerUT S, It+ss eD e x -i ,r=4'SOSS0354 At M A i07.72 it i)e' l i tR K �I ' R •N Y•_Dd J ! V S sr bx ISE. x M ' so �e 3» 188TT E R �^ (41 � s (3)PAN —� 12) � 11) �� —+ ' 6 st ens v / � + --- HO Ie1" rot — --- — ( M � e I I.45Ac. Wesley 3 Mae Cariwrf9ht m N 14) 4 "'" ' " 14 I - 5 �- �- 27 d O $ lli S.P. 383067 I cr U , = r O ---- - ,]>d, to QI - m' =s---------_ 635.SZ so D Is79 p w SIT G, h:~ 20 S.P.973028 Q7T 150t ^ tip!' � I2)� � a 16n � ee G�• 21 °e _ 13) ( (3) 2I na 4 'n538 y ��vy 6 IV GD Jf 14 )seas N 7 1 N 23 22 Y 9� i2) (4) _ II)tD! ^ " TR. B TR ; pa7 Wen DE� T 419Ac.: 8 1.72Ac. _ - (311Q) 24 > � = - r3D- - +2 31V& �'.. 27 , wwmt....,.- ttp - ... 2J0 G01112 4 3 I ) 33.n 1 bni3 QJG u3 ^ I J %20 »I4 TIS s 4a 13 S.P. R678064 1 40 ° 1 _ s - fO 7 PAs H R a DI Aa) is » sass p y - - "• e,' 16 LLI "' n f*1 „ L P ^ 3D23 M IS 9 8 2 3 g .,' 17 ` b° 40 S. E. ^190TH x$T ad 6 14 "... a.�'� (Jj _:...e„i PL. y t8A t J 1 IILrfl p R 9�»u 67 Q ^ ) 63 -• 18Q ` S 10 1, o u 6 c {,,� r' /� IbV .�. sOp �, t ... of Q>�Jq sl6s $ ^ w1.20+ 12) - f H —V L D 1 V^ - 10�^ 12M- 13 10� 05 $4 17 TR. a. 19 a '•� J,; 9 .: p la• ..- -tu—.. -GD- -ne) LD`'' Q .• « (so4uo: tn. .ox Z211 LV.01 10 90 Ylfl I '•� 20� 3'1 a. ». w . A 4G u too Z :I 7 0 0A7Ac. L c (1) - J a : 21 ";77so13 1 -e• o 22() a - SP 383072 1 it 2 3 4 1 '1 rr a" s wtw: F 6 R 90 J.- etss Ain 19 13 F , . rs o , _Z2T F..: 4 5 _ ` ll) 11('i 5•E 1I ,' 0 42 12) (3) R �'� �2 V \ ° ?I �o t2) 041 1413 .. \ _ . c�.> ;w+.>°t: Q ,° 65 ca.n ®0 0./j}4��p(J{, �14) Ito 163 7R.B 1 1 T �TR.&yr- 4 (3) sttS1t2 3D22 24 $ —5.E- --—1912ND— '_ S T. I � r— T4 I,* z 9 . MM, $TA nq[ ,, A "S*,3 for and in conidcmOm of THS DOLLARS AND OVA '4Xb AM VA'. ICE COMPANY NTY DEED 4B6190 Dated: OCTOMM 29. 1997 in h23§d .4 amid wwnmb to pa�% 61lq7 a : WoLIS B. %YLOR PIM JACKI F. TATIbR, MMXM AND WIM ibm CBOTIi FMZbXLL A146., SUSM L. RUMM, Hash;1MAm NIP*., PAD,.,SOLO-iiowv. AN .P MMY AVZLMW]gL, HUSEAM AND WIFV' the fog "WRx# red estate in the CMAY of PCfM Slue . of wah. cc .. '&1 11.1 :.� .r .. TM&Acoo*AN Ombw(s)� 332305-9097-05 HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF Tim SOuTMM=.,.gqArm OF TAN MR.MAov TM IAT -SOUTMMST QUAJ=R OF SSC-iiEd 3,7, ..T.OWSWIP 23 XMIDIM, IN KING C0dIM.,---'w4U'N=w; KXCRVr TH&..-'poRTICn MMRROP LTM WITHIN 1.021M AVMM S-9, ,f j);"-zxqWmcws sirr FORTS ON ATrm3mD 93HIBrr "Am AND By HxjmOil AS IF FULLY INCORPORATED 971:2034Y756 }. at O .......... P4 E4 King County Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: assessor.info aC1� netroke.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ Scott Noble Assessor ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted October 20, 2004 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Falk II Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 27th day of October, 2004 Scott Noble, King County Assessor •®1202M CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson Subject: Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings public meeting. Exhibits: Issue Paper, 10% Notice of Intent Petition, King County Certification Recommended Action: Council concur AI #: For Agenda of. November 22, 2004 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Approvals: Legal Dept...... Finance Dept... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City received a 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition on October 18, 2004 calling for the annexation of a 25.63-acre irregularly shaped site that is generally located east of 144th Avenue SE, if extended, south of SE 1151h Street, if extended, and west of 148th Avenue SE. The Council considered a portion of this proposed annexation at a public meetint on October 4, 2004. Following that meeting, other neighboring property owners along SE 116' Street also requested inclusion and signed a new 10% Notice of Intent petition. Under state law (RCW 35.A.14.120) the Council must set a date not later than 60 days after the filing of the request, for a meeting with the initiating parties to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. City staff have reviewed the 10% Notice of Intent Petition and no major issues have been raised. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set December 6, 2004 for a public meeting with the applicants to consider whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition for the proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation. X X Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President City Council Members VIA:/ Mayor Jesse Tanner Z'� r FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neigrborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (X-6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex about 25.63-acres to the City of Renton by direct petition (Figure 1, Vicinity Map). State law requires that the Council hold a Public Meeting with annexation proponents to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposal, whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of zoning. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the 10% Notice of Intent. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration recommends that Council take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): • Accept the proposed annexation which includes expanding the area along SE 116`h Street east to 148'' Avenue SE; • Authorize the circulation of the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the expanded annexation area; • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area assume, upon future annexation, a proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness, and, • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area accept new zoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation upon future annexation. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent November 10, 2004 Page 2 Much of the irregularly shaped Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation site was considered by Council on October 4, 2004 at a public meeting. At that time neighboring property owners along SE 116`h Street testified and requested inclusion in the proposed annexation. Council approved the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings Petition but directed staff to expand the boundaries to include properties on both the north and south side of SE 116`h Street. Subsequent to that public meeting neighbors further to the east along SE 1161h SW who were not notified of the meeting requested that they be included and signed a new 10% Notice of Intent Petition with many of the original signers. The new petition would expand the Wedgewood Lane Annexation boundaries to the east along SE 116`h Street to the Urban Growth Area boundary at 148`h Avenue SE. Council is required, pursuant to state law, to hold a public meeting with the proponents within 60-days of receipt of the 10% Notice of Intent Petition. This petition was received on October 18, 2004. Location: The proposed 25.63-acre, irregular shaped, Wedgewood Lane Revised Annexation is roughly located between Jericho Avenue SE, if extended, on the west, 148`h Avenue SE on the east for the portion along SE 116`h Street, Honey Creek on the east for the portion of the annexation site south of SE 117`h Street, if extended, SE 1151h Street, if extended, on the north, and, NE Vh Place, if extended, on the south. Assessed value: The estimated assessed valuation at current development is $5,214,340. Natural features: The site generally slopes west to east towards Honey Creek, which crosses the northeast corner of the site near SE 117`h Street at about a 7% slope. Much of the eastern boundary of this annexation site south of SE 117`h Street, if extended, is defined by existing wetlands associated with Honey Creek. (Figure 2, Topography). 4. Existing land uses: Existing development includes twenty existing single-family dwellings with all but two on parcels less than an acre in size (see Figure 3, Existing Structures). 5. Existing zoning: King County zoning is R-4. R-4 allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre, and up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation site Residential Low Density (RLD). The subject annexation is proposed to be zoned R-4 upon eventual annexation into the City. The R-4 is consistent with this Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. 7. Public services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Water Utility. The subject area is within the water service area of Water District #90 by agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan. A certificate of water availability from the District will be required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following annexation to the City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system will also be required for new development in the annexed area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic water service. The City should verify that adequate water supply is available from the District's system for fire protection of new development. Staff notes that the City reserves the right to assume ownership of Water District #90's water system within City limits as allowed by State law. Proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent November 10, 2004 Page 3 Sewers. The area is not currently served by sewer. The nearest sewer line at this time is a line near the intersection of SE 118`'' Street and 142"d Avenue SE. Sewers would be extended by a combination of developer extension, local improvement districts and City capital improvement projects. Parks. The City has a shortfall of both neighborhood and community parkland in this area. King County owns about 39-acres of parkland, primarily undeveloped, about 2/3rd's of a mile to the east/southeast of the proposed annexation. In the past, the County has expressed an interest in conveying these properties to the City, with their annexation. Development of the parkland would occur at the City's expense. The projected cost of developing this land into a community park is estimated by Parks staff to be $3,000,000 with an annual maintenance cost of $175,000 in today's dollars. The direct parks costs attributable to this annexation are estimated to be $33,005, as shown in the attached fiscal analysis worksheet. Fire. The area is currently served by Fire District #10. Upon annexation Renton would take over responsibility for serving this 25.63-acre area. Police. With an estimated future population of approximately 110 people for this revised annexation site, Police indicate that there will eventually be a need for additional officers to serve this and other recent annexations. Public Works Maintenance. Maintenance staff noted that the only organized drainage is roadside ditches, which will have to upgraded at the time of new development. All abutting street right-of-ways are intended to be included in the annexation. Transportation. Staff has noted that SE 116`h Street currently is a one lane local access only street. Portions of it have limited sightlines as well. Staff note that the south half of SE 116`h will likely have to be improved with half street surfacing and eventually curbs, gutters, and sidewalks where major new development occurs. SE 116`h Street is intended to eventually connect through to the west to NE 10`h Street. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject properties are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are subject to development pressure. (Policies LU-378 and LU-380) The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations. (Policy LU-380) Renton is the logical provider of most urban infrastructure and services to the area. (Policy LU-383). Policy LU-388 states that, in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The area proposed for annexation, is abuts the city limits along approximately 30% of its boundaries. 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. In fact, the inclusion of the rest of houses fronting on or accessing from SE 1160' will help ensure neighborhood continuity. Proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent November 10, 2004 Page 4 b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; Boundaries follow physical features such as the edges of wetlands, streets, parcel lines and existing plats. C. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; Not applicable. No service area boundaries are proposed to change as a consequence of this annexation at this time. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The boundaries are somewhat irregular along Honey Creek but these latest revisions to the Wedgewood Lane Annexation make for more normal boundaries. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; This annexation is not being proposed to adjust what are considered impractical boundaries. This annexation like others in the area helps the incorporate out to the edge of the Urban Growth Area boundary within its defined Potential Annexation Area h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Boundary. The County has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Annexation area are rural or designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County or Renton Comprehensive Plans. CONCLUSION: The proposal is essentially consistent with both City Comprehensive Plan policies and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified. A one-time parks development and mitigation cost for this annexation would be $33,005. A fiscal analysis for this proposed annexation is attached. Initial analysis indicates that this expanded annexation would initially cost the City approximately $634 but by full development in an estimated 10 years there would be a minor surplus of $7,191 a year. Attachments Proposed Wedgewood Lane — Revised Annexation 10% Notice of Intent November 10, 2004 Page 5 cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Don Erickson 'Nedgewood Lane Annexation rlgure 2: Topography Map :11 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator P G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. 8 October 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. 1m Interval Countour — — Renton City Limits O Proposed Annexation Area W � o 0 00 0 0 QE 0 00 p -<C [�� ejFo—a fl idd C3 °El qq o' ° �l Q�6C E] 0 1� h a ria 0 n U � d B 0 Qq This document is a graphic representation, not guaranteed to survey accuracy, intended or city ppurposes only and boxed on the beat i fortnotion ovoiioble os of the date shown This mop is for display purposes only. edgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 800 figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 4800 Uti�Y O{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure Alex G. Pietsch, Administrator — — Del Rosario Renton City Limits Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. l'NT� 8 October 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. F---1 Proposed Annexation Area E N edgewood Lane Annexation Igure 4: Sensitive Areas Map Uti�Y 0,{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator Ift G. Del Rosario INTO 8 October 2004 Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. Please see legal description for actual boundary. 117th Q C- O Ln s -:t-Ir7_ This document is a graphic representotim, not guaranteed to survey accuracy. Intended for city urposes only and based on the best information a-ilobPe as of the date shown This mop is for display purposes only. 0 400 800 High Erosion 1 : 4800 Hazard Boundary Wetland > 40% Slope — — Renton City Limits Proposed Annexation Area -j-j Q1 0) .... ... . z P p, !W V-1hW i,!.f , WWARMWIM W FMW- 7"M V VIP Z— 3,i This document Is a grophic representotion, not guaranteed t to survey accurocy, in tended for city Furpo-es only and bo.ed on the best inforrrotion owilobe os of thedoteshown w�7..0.2- ThIs mop is for display purposes only. KI "Vedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 800 bmmo� Hgure 5: Aerial Map RUMM� I : 4800 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Renton City Limits Alex Pietsch, Administrator Proposed Annexation Boundary G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. 8 October 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. WEDGEWOOD LANE - REVISED ANNEXATION - FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET .............. .............. R en: ps" .................... ................... Cit Units Population AV Existing dev. 20 50 $5,214,340 Full dev. 44 110 $16,392,906 Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household $450,000 AV / new unit $260,717 AV / existing unit Existing Full Rate Regular levy $16,477 $51,802 3.16 Excess levy____$417 $1,311 0.08 State shared revenues Rate(per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $176.00 $387.20 Liquor Board profits $5.04 $252.00 $554.40 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $723.00 $1,590.60 Fuel tax - arterials $6.47 $323.50 $711.70 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.36 $18.00 $39.60 Total $1,492.50 $3,283.50 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $2,043.00 $4,494.60 Utility tax** $133.20 $2,664.00 $5,860.80 Fines & forfeits* $18.33 $916.50 $2,016.30 Total $5,623.50 $12,371.70 * Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.23 $11.35 $24.97 Public Defender $3.13 $156.70 $344.74 Jail $7.19 $359.60 $791.12 Subtotal $527.65 $1,160.83 Court/legal/admin. $57.08 $2,854.00 $6,278.80 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $745.00 $1,639.00 Police $270.00 $13,500.00 $29,700.00 Road maintenance** N/A $500.00 $2,307 Fire*** $1.25 $6,517.93 $20,491.13 Total $24,644.58 $61,576.76 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) C>iie=tiE'Cisfs' Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: Total revenues Existing $24OQ4$ .................... .................... Full E$ 7 $22s Total ongoing costs Existing $z444s .................... .................... Full $615$€76 Net fiscal impact Existing Full $7 419 �4v $23,982.32 Total one-time costs: $33,005.24 Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo NAME OF A- oy -005 PROPONENT: WEVeFwppQ I -A S ADDRESS OF 1 e= ��_ PROPONENT: 1 to0 1 �e�` ` �% �1 -1 tx� TY '' PHONE NUMBER OF PROPONENT: ;-LL etiresA�- ML 74-1- c7124, X 10 Z RF ;ci`•'�.;:; NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION — WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION -- Re—V%Se TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION WARNING. Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) :rr,,����i y,I < t� �,�, . �'n`c�'1 �, 1i1��- c`�` � �a t�bo- ``{ t4%Y �1\ d L- ,� -. .ti .4 •t+ �- � -� a ` „ �x � r, -= a _ `'�• ; 4: t .: fy$' h.1✓h A< / �si Z.i _ 1 4 f'i 1. a # � �a� �,,�.,����Xc i4 �Yr.+\� .,a' ,c - 1 �,'�., yQ�ie 'c�1ZE�` ; G ef r[ry o� r Deborah Fain 14429 SE 116h Street Renton, WA 102305 9004 2. /4/t r �� � l CAM ST velop 12012 1480' Avenue SE Renton, WA 102305 9023 3. r �S 122_ 148`b Avenue SE Renton, WA 102305 9017 C S RENT 4 //old FWEDGEWOO'D 11813 148 h Avenue SE Renton, WA 102305 9390 L C 14406 SE 110h Street 102305 9361 5 kAngelVineor Renton, WA -� Patrick Anderso, 14418 SE 110h Street 102305 9365 6 Renton, WA J.amg§ Blankenship 14522 SE 116 Street 102305 9365 7 Q � Mar g� bau7l Renton, WA g 10 1 l }�SJA IJQ� 14600 SE 116 Street Renton, WA 102305 9382 Suellen Warnes r/ 2 SE 116'' Street 102305 9451 9. 1 `(14624 V � 1 Suellen )Karnes )Renton, WA 14619 SE 116`h Street 102305 9358 10. David or Hei ynning H:\DIVISION.S\PBTS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10% Notice of Intent.doc\OD WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION WARNING. Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) �xLy�Y�Jx FY`s d u4 J'L� L Y�l]C �4�3'r. x� 'C ij�!.. S ... . T'_S to.01?l a'- '.�+� hr�.l,l.g.`��+5S�C'"E ��� k'vt i-. "a A F�,4�P } f 1 �.tq Cs'£kw 1 `f+ `X .x �' - yA,, rf F � i � EY .$ ��'. -J . � i� � C � � -: R� c - .uc s •1Q'�`!+'^�t' � j 4. t �`' 6 �tL�/ � None assigned this parcel 102305 9360 David or Hei ' RvnninQ f� l' None assigned this parcel 102305 9359 2 b David or Heidi ing 14428 SE 116'h Street 102305 9363 3. Rodenberg, Lonny None assigned this parcel 102305 9364 George Schaut 146 SE 116`h Street 102305 9366 5 Renton, WA Sean Atchison 14610 SE 116'hStreet 102305 9343 6 Renton, WA David Weirich or Mary Keech 14702 SE 116'h Street 102305 9188 7. Renton, WA Michael or Anita Wafters 11441 148h Avenue SE 102305 9153 8. Renton, WA Thomas or Veneva O'Hara 11425 148`h Avenue SE 102305 9154 9 Renton, WA Robert or Karen Herr 11427 148`h Avenue SE 102305 9156 10. Clarance, Sr. or Dona Statler H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10% Notice of Intent.doOOD WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION WARNING. Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the fling of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) fe+,y .,.j{�5✓, c-. s �, ,�aS F`4i .Y� +^"'• e+� - " x -.c- Y a'r fy.Y• by'�" ,0.,='` y'ee mot+ .. N 4 1.+� 5 11433 148`" Avenue SE 102305 9157 1. Alfred or Vicky Velasquez 14701 SE 116 h Streete 102305 9357 2 Renton, WA Steve or Dana Cormier None assigned this parcel 102305 9347 3. Michael Gerspach 11605 1480' Avenue SE 102305 9352 4 Renton, WA David Gerspach 11615 148`" Avenue SE 102305 9353 5. Timothy Raymond or Renton, WA Kimberly Raymond 11625 148 Avenue SE 102305 9354 6. Chris or Gwenna Mc Clease 7. °Y S7C4elie►%_ GjarnCS WKAve SE 8. 9. 10. H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10% Notice of Intent.doc\OD 10/15/04 Legal Description - Wedgewood Lane Annexation Property That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter and the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington described as follows: COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Section 10; thence S00°02'42"W, along the east line of said Section 10, a distance of 1316.11 feet to the north line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; thence N88° 16' 10"W, along said north line 1323.56 feet to the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; thence S00°05'48"W, along the west line of said southeast quarter, 327.20 feet to the south line of the south 10 acres of the north 50 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said Section 10, the northwest corner of Lot 1, King County Short Plat No. 1177003, recorded under Recording No. 7806130632 and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence continuing S00°05'48"W, along said west line and the west line of said short plat, 990.37 feet to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 10 and the southwest corner of Lot 2 of said short plat; thence S00°13'35"W, along the west line of said northeast quarter, 164.69 feet to the south line of the north half of the north half of the north half of said northeast quarter; thence S88°20'06"E, along said south line, 104.45 feet; thence N05012'53"W 41.82 feet; thence N69°02'10"W 41.24 feet; thence N14029'57"W 33.73 feet; thence N43°51'20"E 24.76 feet; thence N46°27'09"E 31.18 feet; thence N15°28'50"E 28.01 feet; thence N86°25'03"E 45.02 feet; thence S88°42'10"E 30.68 feet; thence N19°08'24"W 17.40'feet; thence N83°07'32"W 16.88 feet; thence N70°48'49"W 18.75 feet; thence N27°30'45"E 44.81 feet; thence N17'01'10"E 30.21 feet; thence N40°35'22"W 24.18 feet; thence N44005'38"W 44.58 feet; thence N32°12'26"E 28.56 feet; thence N22°19'28"E 33.57 feet; thence N60°5326"E 31.92 feet; thence N16039'09"E 31.02 feet; thence N07°06'15"W 40.35 feet; thence N21 °18'53"E 33.28 feet; thence N6000453"E 46.36 feet; thence N39°47143"E 22.10 feet; thence N22039'04"E 33.67 feet; thence N49051'09"E 27.99 feet; thence N4004810611E 25.81 feet; thence N09037'56"W 23.56 feet; thence N27°12'17"E 37.36 feet; thence N67003'47"E 12.47 feet; thence N32°48'21 "W 13.21 feet; thence N02039'44"E 55.12 feet; thence N08°34'43"W 44.43 feet; thence N35°26'16"E 26.33 feet; thence N61°53'16"E 21.53 feet; thence S02000'57"E 22.80 feet; thence N84°43'29"E 60.58 feet; thence NO3°56'23"E 56.07 feet; thence S88°20'02"E 129.09 feet; thence N11°45'02"E 36.41 feet; thence N05°25'02"W 29.13 feet; thence N88020'02"W 98.33 feet; thence NI8°22'48"E 60.57 feet; thence N36°33'09"E 85.49 feet; thence N31°50'03"E 24.86 feet; thence N03033'30"W 38.36 feet; thence N33008'41 "E 9.57 feet; thence N42016'35"E 21.22 feet; thence N59038'43"E 51.47 feet; thence N39010'14"E 23.76 feet to the south line of said south 10 acres and the north line of Lot I of said short plat; thence N88020'02"W along said line, 602.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Also known as Parcel C, King County Boundary Line Adjustment recorded under Recording No. TOGETHER WITH the west half of the south 10 acres of the north 50 acres of the east half of the northeast quarter of said Section 10; Wedgewood Lane Annexation - I - Legal Description TOGETHER WITH the West 142 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the South 30 feet thereof, TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over and under the South 30 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within 1481h Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the East H2 feet of the West 254 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 30 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over and under the South 30 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within 148`h Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the East 112 feet of the west 366 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 30 feet thereof, TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over and under the South 30 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within 148`h Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the West half of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, AND except the West 478 feet thereof, AND except the South 30 feet thereof, TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over and under the South 30 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within 148h Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the West 80 feet of the East 410 feet, except the Ease 24 feet of the South 57 feet thereof, AND the West 15.20 feet of the North 89.96 feet of the West 150 feet of the East 330 feet, ALL of the North 146.96 feet of the South 176.96 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress over the South 30 feet of the West 380 feet of the East 410 feet of said subdivision; TOGETHER WITH the South 120 feet of the North 150 feet of the West 100 feet of the East 230 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter; TOGETHER WITH Lot I of revised King County Short Plan No. 882009, according to the Short Plat recorded under King County Recording No. 8805261152, said short plat being a portion of Wedgewood Lane Annexation - 2 - Legal Description the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; TOGETHER WITH a portion of the west 112 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, described as follows: BEGINNING AT the Northwest corner of the West 112 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter; THENCE East along North line 57 feet to point of beginning; THENCE continuing East along North line 55 feet to East line of said subdivision; THENCE South along said East line 106 feet; THENCE Westerly 22 feet; THENCE Northwesterly 110 feet, more or less, to POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10, described as follows: West 28.85 feet of the East 438.85 feet of the North 146.96 feet of the South 176.96 feet of the South 10 acres, ALSO KNOWN AS Lot A of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. S90M0245, approved January 10, 1991, recorded under King County Recording No. 9102130947, Less the West 28.85 feet of the East 438.85 feet of the North 146.96 feet of the South 176.96 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., situate in the County of King, State of Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South 75 feet of the North 225 feet of the East 160 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the East 30 feet for road purposes (148 h Ave SE); TOGETHER WITH the East 160 feet of the East Half of the South 10 Acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 30 feet for road. TOGETHER WITH the West 170 feet of the East 330 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 120 feet of the North 150 feet of the East 70 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion lying within the North 30 feet of said South 10 acres; TOGETHER WITH the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 530 feet; and EXCEPT the North 30 feet. TOGETHER WITH the West 100 feet of the East 530 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the North 30 feet; Wedgewood Lane Annexation - 3 - Legal Description TOGETHER WITH the west 100 feet of the East 420 feet of the East half of the South 10 acres of the North 50 acres of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 30 feet; TOGETHER WITH Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. L02S0016, recorded under King County Recording No. 20040817900010, situate in King County, Washington. TOGETHER WITH the West 150 feet of the East 330 feet; EXCEPT the West 15.20 feet of the North 89.96 feet thereof; AND the East 24 feet of the South 57 feet of the West 80 feet of the East 410 feet; ALL in the North 146.96 feet of the South 176.96 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North 146.96 feet of the South 176.96 feet of the East 180 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT portion thereof lying within 148th Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the South 124 feet of the North 152 feet of the East 210 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 120 feet of the South 110 feet; EXCEPT that portion lying within 148 Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the West 90 feet of the East 120 feet of the South 110 feet of the North 152 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East; EXCEPT that portion, if any, lying within 148`h Avenue Southeast; TOGETHER WITH the South 120 feet of the North 150 feet of the East 130 feet of the East half of the South 10 Acres of the North 50 Acres of East half of the Northeast quarter of - Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in King County, Washington. Except the County Road; TOGETHER WITH the West 200 feet of the East 410 feet of the North 152 feet of the South 10 Acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in King County, Washington. Except the East 160 feet of the North 7 feet. Together with South 20 feet of the North 27 feet of the East 210 feet of the South 10 Acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter. Except the County Road; Contains 1,118,185± square feet (25.67f acres). Wedgewood Lane Annexation - 4 - Legal Description King Counter Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: assessor.info@metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ Scott Noble Assessor ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted October 20, 2004 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Revised Wedgewood Lane Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 27th day of October, 2004 Scott Noble, King tounty Assessor CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL >UBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board. Human Resources & Risk Management Staff Contact....... Michael Webby (x —7650) 1 UBJECT: reclassification of eighteen classifications for anuary 2003, January 2004 and July 2004 I #: FOR AGENDA OF: November 22, 2004 1 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ................. X Public Hearing..... Correspondence... Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business......... :HIBITS: Executive Summaries for January 2004 ( New Business....... and July 2004, Study Session........ Job Classifications: Judicial Specialist/Trainer, Benefits Analyst, Executive Secretary, HR Systems Technician, HR Analyst, Facilities Supervisor, Librarian Other ..................... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept............ Finance Dept........ Other ..................... 'ISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required ..... $ 106,567. Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted ........... $ 106,567. Revenue Generated....... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Reclassification of the following classifications. Current Title Grade New Grade Budget Change thru 2004 Building Inspector/Combination a18 a21 $44,149 Building Inspector — Electrical a18 a21 $14,927 The above changes are effective January 1, 2003. These reclassifications will not require additional budget appropriations. Current Title Grade New Grade Budget Change thru 2004 Finance Analyst III New Title: Business Systems Analyst n16 a23 $4,452 Judicial Specialist New Title: Judicial Specialist/Trainer a08 a10 $2,196 Golf Course Manager m26 m32 $6,293 Facilities Manager m26 m28 $3,516 Recreation Manager m26 m28 $3,516 Park Maintenance Manager m26 m28 $3,516 Secretary I New Title: Secretary II a05 a07 $1,014 Secretary I New Title: Administrative Secretary/Risk Management Assistant n05 nl 1 $2,040 Assistant HR Analyst New Title: Benefits Analyst n11 m20 $3,888 ,he above changes are effective January 1, 2004. These reclassifications will not require additional budget appropriations. Current Title Grade New Grade Budget Change thru 2004 Executive Secretary n13 m17 $2,372 Librarian a17 a22 $6,282 Library Supervisor a12 a17 $3,612 Library Assistant I New Title: Library Assistant II a03 a09 $ 966 Facilities Supervisor a20 a2l $ 738 \ssistant HR Analyst New Title: HR Analyst n 11 m20 $1,944 AR Systems Technician n09 nll $1,146 LTht)rovriations- STAFF o~�Y o� CITY OF RENTON ' ' HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT 0� DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council v1A: �c =ebby, olker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: HR & RM Administrator SUBJECT: Review of January 1, 2004 Re -Class Requests - Executive Summary The purpose of this document is to provide an executive summary of the review process of certain positions. If approved, the recommended salary adjustments contained in this report would be retroactive to January 1, 2004. The salary analysis affects positions in the Finance/Information Systems, Administrative/Judicial/Legal Services, Community Services, Planning/Building/Public Works, and Human Resources/Risk Management Departments. We processed nine reviews during this period and are recommending all nine for salary adjustments. The result of this review process, if approved, will provide salary adjustments to nine employees. Salary adjustments are based upon the labor market and internal equity. The total cost, twelve months salary, of implementation during FY 2004 is approximately $ 30,430.50, excluding salary related benefits. Recommendation by Department FINANCEANFORMATION SYSTEMS Finance Analyst III (Non -Represented, grade n16): The primary duties of one position in this classification has been significantly changed to assist departments in planning, developing, coordinating and analyzing business processes/technology systems. We conducted a salary survey and recommend a new classification be adopted and placed in the City's pay plan at range a23, titled Business Systems .Analyst, the position will be represented within AFSCME Local 2170. January 2004 Re -Class Executive Summary (Cont'd) ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES Judicial Specialist (Local 2170, grade a08): The primary duties of one position have been modified to allow the incumbent to conduct initial training for new specialists as well as continuous training. This position will also provide technical support to the other specialists by filling in to assist in day-to-day operations. We recommend a new classification be adopted and placed in the City's pay plan at range al and titled Judicial Specialist/Trainer. PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS Secretary I (Local 2170, grade a05,) Aifport Division: The duties and responsibilities have changed and the incumbent is performing Secretary H duties. This position has been assigned the responsibilities and duties consistent with those of a Secretary II. The position has performed work at a complex level by maintaining comprehensive records, and files pertaining to departmental expenditures, budget etc. This position has the responsibility for training, evaluating, scheduling and assigning duties of a part-time office assistant. We recommend the position be changed to grade a07, Secretary II. HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Secretary I (Non -Represented, grade n05): The duties and responsibilities of this position have changed significantly and the incumbent is performing Administrative Secretary ILRisk Management Assistant duties. The incumbent prepares and maintains complex property and liability files, researches, analyzes, and determines liability of moderately complex in-house property and liability claims. We recommend the position be changed to grade nl 1 Administrative Secretary II/Risk Management Assistant. Assistant HR Analyst (Non -Represented, grade n11): The primary duties and responsibilities of one position have changed significantly and the incumbent is performing Benefit Analyst duties. The incumbent assists with development of, and amendments to, policies and procedures; responds to and answers inquiries regarding policies and procedures, and employee benefits. The incumbent coordinates administration of employee benefit plans by reviewing claims processed for transfer of funds, adjudicates employee claims problems and assists employees with benefits questions. We recommend a new classification be adopted and placed in the City's pay plan at range m20 and titled Benefits Analyst. COMMUNITY SERVICES Golf Course Manager (Non -Represented, grade m26): The duties and responsibilities have remained stable. This position is responsible for the overall operation of the Maplewood Golf course, which is a multimillion -dollar enterprise with all of the attendant risk and liability associated. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based upon labor market analysis as well as internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade m32. Park Maintenance Manager (Non -Represented grade m26): The duties and responsibilities of this position now include urban forestry activities. The position is responsible for the overall maintenance of all City parks and right of ways. The need for knowledge of computer Page 2 of 3 January 2004 Re -Class Executive Summary (Cont'd) technology related to this position has increased. The position is responsible for computerized programming rather than manual scheduling. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based primarily on internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade m28. Recreation Manager (Non -Represented, grade m26): The duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly. The position is responsible for the overall operations of the recreation division. The position is responsible for general decisions concerning the future operation, planning, and activities related to the new swimming pool. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based primarily on internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade m28. Facilities Manager (Non -Represented, grade m26): The duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly, but the complexity of maintenance issues has increased especially in the technology arena. The position is responsible for the overall maintenance of all City facilities, including security and access systems. The knowledge of security technology and general computer technology related to this position has become a high priority. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based primarily on internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade m28. Page 3 of 3 U1�Y o� CITY OF RENTON HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kath Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor a FROM: Webby, HR & RM Administrator SUBJECT: Review of July 1, 2004 Re -Class Requests - Executive Summary The purpose of this document is to provide an executive summary of the review process of certain positions. If approved, the recommended salary adjustments contained in this report would be retroactive to July 1, 2004 except for two (2) classifications, which would be retroactive to January 1, 2003. The salary analysis affects positions in the Administrative/Judicial/Legal Services, Community Services, Planning/Building/Public Works, and Human Resources/Risk Management Departments. We processed eleven reviews during this period and are recommending seven (7) for salary adjustments for 2004 and two (2) salary adjustments for January 1, 2003. The result of this review process, if approved, will provide salary adjustments to seventeen employees. Salary adjustments are based upon the labor market and internal equity. The cost of implementation during FY 2004 is approximately $ 46,386.50 and FY2003 for two (2) classifications (seven (7) emplo ,gees) is approximately $29,749.00, excluding salary related benefits for a grand total of $76,135.50. This total is in addition to the cost of the reclassification package previously presented to Council. Recommendation by Department ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES Executive Secretary (Non -Represented, grade n13): the duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly, however, we have submitted a new job classification to adequately describe the responsibilities of the position. We conducted a salary survey and found we had not kept pace with comparable positions in the labor market. We recommend the position be increased to grade m17, Step D. July 2004 Re -Class Executive Summary (Cont'd) PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS Civil Engineer III (Local 2170, grade a27,) Utilities Division: The duties and responsibilities have not changed. The position has performed work at a complex level and the employee should be recognized through the performance evaluation process, for his ability to adapt to changing need of the division and high quality performance of these duties. External data justifies this position should remain at grade a27. Water Utilities Maintenance Technician (Local 2170, grade a15) Maintenance Division: Our analysis of this position determined no new duties have been assigned, and the incumbent is not required to work outside of his assigned classification. External survey data justifies this position remain at grade al5. Building Inspector/Combination & Building Inspector — Electrical (Local 2170, grade al8) Development Services Division: The duties and responsibilities of these positions have not changed. Our recommendation to reclassify these positions is based upon the labor market analysis conducted for Construction Inspector H classifications in Public Works. We also consider internal equity in our compensation program and recommend that parity be maintained between Public Works Construction Inspectors and Building Inspectors. The Construction Inspector classification was recommended for an upgrade in January 1, 2003. We conducted an external salary survey using 17 cities as matches and found that market data also supported a salary increase to range a21. Therefore, we recommend the Building Inspectors be raised to grade a21 effective January 1, 2003. HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT Assistant HR Analyst (Non -Represented, grade nl 1): The primary duties and responsibilities of this position have changed significantly since July 1, 2004 and now the incumbent is responsible for managing the entire recruitment process for non -civil service positions. We recommend a new classification be adopted and placed in the City's pay plan at range m20 and titled Human Resources Analyst HR Systems Technician (Non -Represented, grade n09): Our analysis of this position determined no new duties have been assigned to date. However, the incumbent will be required to support future recruitment activities and a modification of the classification is necessary prior to assigning such duties. These additional duties add complexity to the current position which, justifies this position be placed in range nl 1. COMMUNITY SERVICES Facilities Supervisor (Local 2170, grade a20): The duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly. The complexity of maintenance issues has increased especially in the technology arena. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based upon labor market analysis as well as internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade a21. Page 2 of 3 July 2004 Re -Class Executive Summary (Cont'd) Librarian (Local 2170, grade al7): The duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly. The need for knowledge of computer technology related to this position has increased. External data justifies this position should be raised. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based on the external labor market. We recommend the position be increased to grade a22. Library Supervisor (Local 2170, grade a12): The duties and responsibilities have not changed significantly. The position is responsible for the overall operations of each library. Our recommendation to reclassify this position is based on the external labor market. We recommend the position be increased to grade all. Library Assistant I (Local 2170, grade a03): The duties and responsibilities have changed and the incumbent is performing Library Assistant II duties. This position has been assigned the responsibilities and duties consistent with those of a Library Assistant II. The position has performed work at a complex level by mending library materials in all formats, including videotapes and audiocassettes. The incumbent jackets new books and evaluates the damage to materials and determines monetary assessment. This position has the responsibility for training, evaluating, scheduling and assigning duties of a part-time staff. We recommend the position be changed to grade a09, Library Assistant II. Page 3 of 3 41D CITY OF RENTON CLASS TITLE: JUDICIAL SPECIALIST/TRAINER (CS- ) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Court Services Director, train judicial staff to perform the technical record -keeping and clerical duties in support of the Municipal Court. Fill in for judicial staff during absence; processing forms, orders and documentation for court cases from origin to final disposition; assisting the public and explaining court procedures and the judicial system. Perform primary data entry function for the court. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Enter citations, transactions, proceedings, and documentation relative to case management in the computer system. *Train staff on each desks in court as semi-annual rotations occur. *Review desk procedures with existing staff following desk rotations. *Update desk procedures manuals as changes in statute and court practices occur. *Communicate a wide variety of information to public regarding court functions and procedures by telephone and at the counter. Maintain confidentiality and tact in dealing with the public. *Update Court Services Director and Lead Judicial Specialists regarding status of employees during ongoing training. *Set cases for various types of hearings; prepare court calendars and notify parties related to case by subpoena, summons, officer notice and bonding company notice; process continuance requests. Track cases with continued, suspended or deferred status; monitor cases on probation for various evaluations, schools, or management courses (i.e. alcohol, victims panel, anger management, defensive driving school) obtain record checks, review compliance and non-compliance reports, send notices and prepare calendar. *Maintain warrant control; issue, recall, process and purge warrants; maintain failure to appear control; order, issue, adjudicate and purge as appropriate. Judicial Specialist - Continued Page 2 Act as mental health/commitment coordinator, prepare orders, contact Western State or other Drs. to coordinate an appointment for evaluation, prepare transport order, coordinate with jail, attach order with needed documents and coordinate all other schedules and information. *Monitor and process probation information, including docketing, photo copying status reports to determine whether to set for court review or not. *Prepare and perform various duties to maintain and prepare various calendars including but not limited to; License calendar, Judge's review calendar, jail calendar, contested calendars, pretrail/trial calendars. Determining if defendant is eligible for personal recognizance bond by reviewing court records. If eligible complete forms and set appropriate hearing and recall warrant. Maintain accounts receivable and time pay accounts; send statements and delinquent notices, order and send collection statements. Track prisoners in custody awaiting arraignment, trial or review hearing; maintain jail commitments and follow-up proceedings. Serve as jury coordinator; select, qualify, summons, track attendance and hours served by Jurors and calculate expenditures. *Serve as court clerk while court is in session and record and document proceedings; perform bailiff duties during jury trials; direct and accommodate jurors. Schedule appointments and prepare documents for referral to probation. *Calculate, accept and account for bails, fines, restitution and costs; enter transactions in computer system recording receipt of funds; balance journal and make daily deposit as assigned. Perform various duties related to the domestic violence legislation requirements including but not limited to: screen and assist domestic violence victims in filing order for protection and/or no contact order, preparing orders, copying, notifying Domestic Violence Advocate, entering information into computer, searching for information. *Maintain confidentiality and tact in dealing with the public. Issue vouchers authorizing witness fee and juror payments. Judicial Specialist - Continued Page 3 *Process Passport Applications *Operate a variety of office equipment including personal computer, printer, typewriter, copier, SRS recording system, forms burster and others. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE OF: • Effective teaching techniques • Courtroom policies, procedures and practices. • Legal forms, documents and terminology. • County and State agencies and offices involved in court -related activities. • County ordinances, State laws, regulations and procedures. • Modern office practices, procedures, equipment and record -keeping techniques. • Operation of a computer terminal and other office equipment. • Telephone techniques and etiquette. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. ABILITY TO: • Gather and retain current knowledge on all desk procedures in office • Recognize and react successfully to various learning styles Interact with emotionally distraught, irate and combative individuals. • Recognize potential danger and take appropriate action to ensure safety and security. • Attend assigned court proceedings and document proceedings with absolute accuracy. • Process a wide variety of legal forms and documents and maintain records and prepare reports in compliance with established procedures, mandated timelines and judicial direction. • Perform a wide variety of complex and responsible court -related clerical duties accurately and efficiently. • Work effectively with defendants and the public and provide information regarding court cases and procedures. Process arrest warrants accurately and in accordance with the law. • Operate office machines and equipment including typewriter, copier, ten key and computer equipment. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Read, interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, policies and procedures. • Maintain records and prepare reports. • Type at 35 words per minute, add, subtract, multiply and divide quickly and accurately. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with others. Work independently with little direction. Judicial Specialist - Continued Page 4 Meet schedules and time lines. Complete work with many interruptions. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: graduation from high school and three years of increasingly responsible clerical or teaching experience in the legal field. Legal experience mandatory. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment, and may involve working with hostile or belligerent customers. * DENOTES ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS Effective Date Revision History January 2004 CITY OF RENTON CLASS TITLE: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ANALYST (HR-2466) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of an assigned supervisor, perform technical work primarly in emloyee benefits design; financing and administration. Provide work in recruitment, testing, selection, training, and payroll as required. Draft and interpret policies and procedures, perform special projects as required. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Provide assistance in the area of design, funding and administration of the City's employee benefit program. Coordinate the activities of the Employee Benefits Task Force. Participate in collective bargaining activities including direct labor negotiations. *Coordinate administration of employee benefit plans by reviewing claims processed for transfer of funds; adjudicate employee claims problems and assist employees with benefits questions; interpret coverage and act as liaison between the City's insurance broker, self -funded Third Party Administrator (TPA) and the City regarding employee benefits programs. *Assist with development of, and amendments to, policies and procedures; respond to and answer inquiries regarding policies and procedures, and employee benefits. *Research, draft, and update human resources policies, procedures, programs and systems for administrative review. Coordinate with department representatives and prepare recruitment and selection programs, including written tests, practical examinations and interview questions. Participate as a member of interview panels and assist with other human resources selection activities as assigned. *Conduct new employee orientation; coordinate the probationary employee performance evaluation program; process new hire, promotional and other human resources -related documents on a computerized payroll system. * Prepare and maintain a variety of records, files, reports, eligibility lists and certifications relative to Human Resources functions; organize and oversee comprehensive records related to human resources administration; assure proper storage, organization and retrieval of information. * Serve as Privacy Clerk as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Employee Benefits Analyst - Continued Page 2 Coordinate and participate in various training sessions, workshops and classes for individuals and employee groups * Assure compliance with City human resources policies and procedures, and a variety of State and federal laws concerning employment, benefits and human resources administration. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Principles and practices of public human resources administration. • Employee benefit program policies, procedures and administration. • Recruitment and selection procedures. Development of legally defensible examination tests and assessment centers. • Research methods, data collection and sampling techniques and statistical analysis • Employment and collective bargaining laws, agreements and contracts. • Interviewing techniques. Technical functions and operations of a human resources office • Laws, rules and regulations related to assigned activities. • Oral and written communication skills. Record -keeping techniques. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. ABILITY TO: • Perform technical work in benefits administration, recruitment, selection, and testing. • Develop and administer examinations for various entry level and promotional positions. • Work independently and make decisions within broad guidelines. • Maintain the confidentiality of sensitive information. • Provide technical information to the public, City officials and employees regarding human resources policies, and employee benefits. • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Read, interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, and contract requirements, policies and procedures. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective relationships with others. • Operate a personal computer • Collect, compile, analyze and tabulate statistical data • Meet schedules and time lines • Maintain the maintenance of records • Prepare detailed and statistical reports EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Employee Benefits Analyst - Continued Page 3 Any combination equivalent to: bachelor's degree in business, public administration, human resources management or related field and two years of human resources experience involving, benefits administration, and related human resources experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment with occasional night meetings. * Denotes Essential job Functions Effective: January 1, 2004 CITY OF RENTON 44P CLASS TITLE: EXECUTIVE SECRETARY (CS-6103) 44 BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer, perform highly responsible and complex secretarial, administrative assistance and office coordination duties to assist the Mayor, Chief Administrative Officer and the Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer; exercise independent judgment and confidentiality in assisting with administrative details, requiring considerable knowledge, use and interpretation of City policies and procedures; train, supervise and evaluate assigned clerical personnel. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Perform highly responsible and complex secretarial, administrative assistance and office coordination duties to assist the Mayor, Chief Administrative Officer and the Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer; exercise independent judgment and confidentiality in assisting with administrative details, requiring considerable knowledge, use and interpretation of City policies and procedures. *Oversee and administer day-to-day activities and functions of the Mayor's Office, utilizing a high degree of independent judgment and initiative in coordinating and performing highly complex, technical and responsible functions of the office. *Type letters, memos, correspondence and reports; including information regarding confidential matters as required. Proofread all correspondence, reports. etc. that are submitted by all departments for the siLynature of both the Mayor and CAO, in addition to all the outreach material and other external communication produced by the Mayor's Office. *Maintain extensive filing systems; maintain budgetary accounts for the Executive Department, Mayor's office division prepare requisitions and purchase orders and order office supplies as needed. *Prepare and distribute daily and monthly calendars of scheduled meetings for the City; prepare agendas for the Mayor's Administrative Staff Meetings; prepare and distribute Mayor's Administrative Report. *Greet visitors to the Mayor's Office, answer phones, provide routine information and direct to appropriate individual; open, sort and distribute incoming mail; receive citizen complaints and concerns; resolve complaints or refer situation to appropriate individual. Executive Secretary - Continued Page 2 *Maintain appointment calendars for the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer; schedule council conference room and City Council chambers as needed. *Monitor and track appointments to the Boards, Commissions, and Committees. Prepare agenda bills/committee reports, coordinate with appointee and support staff. Maintain and distribute current list of members. Provide secretarial assistance to City Council Liaison and Councilmembers; receive visitors and telephone calls and relay messages. Assist Community Relations Manager in scheduling and coordinating City Hall tours. *Train, schedule, assign, supervise and evaluate assigned clerical personnel. Remain current concerning issues, situations and conditions of special interest to the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer. *Exercise discretion in disseminating information, explaining policies and procedures and speaking as directed for the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer in personal and telephone contacts and meetings. *Coordinate and lead Renton's monthly Administrative Secretary's meetings. Establish and participate in a regional meeting of Mayor's Secretaries. Research records and obtain information from other offices and agencies as necessary to perform assigned duties. *Compose effective correspondence independently; reference policies, rules and regulations in preparing correspondence. Conduct research of problems and situations, consulting with involved staff members, investigating policies and procedures and gathering background materials. Consult with City personnel and others concerning specific issues and situations. *Operate a personal computer and peripheral equipment to maintain records and generate lists, reports and other materials; utilize word Executive Secretary - Continued Page 3 processing and other software; operate a typewriter, dictation equipment, FAX machine and standard office equipment. Perform related duties as assigned. Executive Secretary - Continued Page 4 KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Principles, practices and procedures utilized in an administrative office. • Office management techniques. • City organization, operations, policies and objectives. • Applicable sections of City Codes and other applicable laws. • Research methods and report writing techniques. • Basic budget preparation and control techniques. • Modern office practices, procedures and equipment including computer operation. • Principles and practices of supervision and training. • Telephone techniques and etiquette. • Record -keeping techniques. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary. • Oral and written communication skills. Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. ABILITY TO: • Perform highly responsible and complex secretarial and administrative assistance duties in support of the Mayor and the Chief Administrative Officer. • Exercise independent judgment in assisting the Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer in administrative details, requiring considerable knowledge, use and interpretation of City policies and procedures. • Coordinate and oversee production of Mayor's Office agendas and minutes and related functions. • Read, interpret, explain and follow rules, regulations, policies and procedures. • Train, supervise and evaluate personnel. • Establish and maintain a variety of complex and confidential files and records. • Compile and organize complex material and summarize discussions and actions taken in report form. • Compose effective correspondence independently. • Assign and review the work of others. • Operate a variety of office equipment including personal computer. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with others. • Type at 60 words net per minute from clear copy. • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Make arithmetic calculations with speed and accuracy. • Understand and work within scope of authority. • Work independently with little direction. • Meet schedules and time lines. • Work confidentially with discretion. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. Executive Secretary - Continued Page 5 EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: two years of college -level course work in secretarial science, office management, business or related field and five years of increasingly responsible and varied secretarial experience, including at least three years experience performing secretarial work for an administrative official. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment. * DENOTE ESSINTIAL FUNCTIONS Effective Date: August 20 ' July 2004 Revision History: August 2001 Revision History: September 1993 4,4p 4 CITY OF RENTON 4Pr CLASS TITLE: HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN (HR-5142) BASIC FUNCTIONS: Under the direction of to uuffl.,n Reso i-ees and R.isk Management n,a,, mist.-ataf.an assi ned supervisor, develop and maintain department computer files, local area network (LAN) and data base systems; coordinate with information systems staff and vendor consultants to assure the system meets City and department needs and requirements; maintain data and process financial matters associated with the department and risk management activities; train department personnel in systems use and maintenance; assist department personnel with various clerical and routine administrative duties; answer phones, greet visitors and assist employees and the general public. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: * Develop data base and other computer programs and systems; maintain department computer files, local area network (LAN) and data base systems; inspect data, verify accuracy and input data from various documents and sources into computerized data base; update, modify and correct computer files to maintain the accuracy and completeness of data. * Develop report formats and configurations, a-nd—key information into a database, andproduce periodic and requested reports, including affirmative action statistical reports, EDA reports and other statistical reports. * Assist in the maintenance of budgetary and account balances; under direction, assist in the preparation of the annual budget, compiling information from various paper and computer records and files. * Review invoices, purchase orders, travel vouchers and other transactions for completeness, compliance with established policies and procedures, and proper authorization; resolve problems before preparing for data entry; enter transactions into the accounting systems. Assist with questions about property, casualty and other risk management policies and procedures; assist in following -up on risk management claims and in coordinating loss control efforts between departments and third party administrator; review and process third party administrator billings, interf ind transfers, premium payments and other financial activity associated with risk management. Human Resources Systems Technician - Continued Page 2 ** Maintain the property schedule, creating and maintaining a data base of tracking Certificates of Insurance and claims files; coordinate information gathering for insurance renewals. *—Develop and maintain risk management and workers' compensation data base programs; develop report formats and produce periodic and requested reports; enter data as necessary. * Operate numerous software programs, including word processing, spreadsheets, and data base applications; prepare special projects such as graphs, charts, graphics applications and other assignments. * Serve as primary baek uptothe Benefits Coordinator-- in creationCreate and maintain of -computer payroll files; verify entries for accuracy and completeness; coordinate with payroll office as necessary. * Answer telephone and greet the general public; provide information and assistance to callers and visitors; take messages or refer calls or visitors to the appropriate human resources staff member or to other City departments or other agencies. Assist the Benefits C-eefinatef Analyst with employee inquiries about benefits, including but not limited to medical and dental insurance, deferred compensation, retirement, flexible benefits and COBRA provisions; assist employees with the resolution of benefit problems. * Train department personnel in computer systems and programs; provide technical assistance with computer hardware and software applications; identify potential problems and recommend solutions. *Assist department personnel with various clerical and routine administrative support duties; type correspondence memoranda and reports; schedule meetings and conferences; arrange for conference room; assure the provision of necessary materials and equipment. As directed attend meetings of the Human Rights Commission; record meeting proceedings; prepare and distribute minutes. *Assist with Civil Servieerecruitment functions; includinp, assisting in the administration of written and physical tests, scoring tests, and scheduling tests: Human Resources Systems Technician - Continued Page 3 Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Computerized data management techniques; • Local Area Network (LAN) system administration. • DOS commands. • Data Base languages, report writers and software applications used by the department. • Modern office practices, procedures and equipment. • Basic research methods. • Policies and objectives of assigned programs and activities. • Financial and statistical record -keeping techniques. • Record -keeping techniques. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary. • Telephone techniques and etiquette. ABILITY TO: • Maintain computerized data base management systems. • Perform minor system malfunction identification and resolution. • Operate a computer terminal to enter data, maintain records and generate reports. • Perform complex and responsible technical and office support duties. • Apply and explain policies, procedures, rules and regulations. • Respond accurately to questions on assigned activities from other departments, agencies and the public • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Meet schedules and time lines. • Maintain budget and other financial records. • Answer telephone and greet the public courteously. • Maintain records and filing systems and prepare reports. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with others. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: graduation from high school supplemented by courses in microcomputer and network system operations, and accounting and three years of office clerical experience, including at least one year of microcomputer system operations and or accounting. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment. Human Resources Systems Technician - Continued Page 4 * Denotes Essential Job Functions Effective Date: July 2004 Revision History: December 1994 CITY OF RENTON 40 CLASS TITLE: HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST (HR-2466) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of an assigned supervisor, perform technical work in recruitment, testing, selection, and classification analysis, training, payroll, compensation and benefits administration; prepare policies and procedures, perform special projects. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Coordinate with department representatives and prepare recruitment and selection programs, including written tests, practical examinations and interview questions. Participate as a member of interview panels and assist with other human resources selection activities as assigned, screen and score applications. *Prepare and maintain a variety of records, files, reports, eligibility lists and certifications relative to Human Resources functions; organize and oversee comprehensive records related to human resources administration; assure proper storage, organization and retrieval of information. *Coordinate and participate in various training sessions, workshops and classes for individuals and employee groups. *Investigate, interpret and administer legal compliance issues, provide staff training on compliance issues as directed. *Assure compliance with City human resources policies and procedures, and a variety of State and federal laws concerning employment, benefits and human resources administration. *Research, draft, updates to human resources policies, procedures, programs and systems for administrative review. *Conduct job analysis and classification studies and recommend appropriate position classification; collect, review and analyze position information and present classification recommendations; prepare and revise class specifications. *Research and analyze salary data and draft recommendations on wage and salary administration; assist in the design and conduct salary surveys and compensation studies and analyze compensation data; provide information to other agencies and jurisdictions. Human Resources Analyst - Continued Page 2 *Assist with development of, and amendments to, policies and procedures; respond to and answer inquiries regarding policies and procedures, salary information, ordinances, and employee benefits. Conduct new employee orientation; coordinate the probationary employee performance evaluation program; process new hire, promotional and other human resources -related documents on a computerized payroll system. *Operate a variety of office equipment including a personal computer and related software applications; drive to other City sites to conduct work. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Principles and practices of public human resources administration. • Recruitment and selection procedures. • Development of legally defensible examination tests and assessment centers. • Compensation plan administration • Analysis and implementation of wage and salary administration and salary surveys • Research methods, data collection and sampling techniques and statistical analysis • Employment and collective bargaining laws, agreements and contracts. • Interviewing techniques. • Employee benefit program policies, procedures and administration. • Technical functions and operations of a human resources office • Laws, rules and regulations related to assigned activities. • Oral and written communication skills. • Record -keeping techniques. • Correct English usage, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. ABILITY TO: • Perform technical work in recruitment, selection, testing, classification analysis, and compensation administration. • Develop and administer examinations for various entry level and promotional positions. • Work independently and make decisions within broad guidelines. • Maintain the confidentiality of sensitive information. • Provide technical information to the public, City officials and employees regarding human resources policies, and employee benefits. • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Read, interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, and contract requirements, policies and procedures. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective relationships with others. 0 Operate a personal computer Human Resources Analyst - Continued Page 3 • Collect, compile, analyze and tabulate statistical data • Meet schedules and time lines • Maintain the maintenance of records • Prepare detailed and statistical reports EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: bachelor's degree in business, public administration, human resources management or related field and two years of human resources experience involving, recruiting, testing, classification, compensation, and related human resources experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment with occasional night meetings. * Denotes Essential job Functions July 2004 CITY OF RENTON )DRAFT CLASS TITLE: FACILITIES SUPERVISOR (MA-3089) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Facilities MaaManaer, plan, schedule, organize and supervise the City's eustedial an building maintenance services; assist in the formulation and implementation of short and long-range plans, preventive maintenance, maintenance and repair projects; train, assign, supervise and evaluate assigned skilled and unskilled maintenance and oustodia personnel; assure work is completed in compliance with standards, codes and timelines. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Plan, schedule, organize and supervise City custodial an building maintenance services, and security systems including elea-n-ing, maintenance, and repair of parks and general government facilities; inspect parks and facilities to determine general maintenance and repair needs. *Schedule and supervise day-to-day operations and activities of building maintenance personnel; assist in the planning, scheduling and implementation of projects; organize and coordinate daily work assignments and priorities; implement an effective preventive maintenance program. *Plan a variety of emergency and periodic maintenance functions such as carpet extraction, refinishing of gym and wood floors, stripping of floors, repair and installationand installation of plumbing, electrical and HVAC and minor renovations. *Inspect work in progress and upon completion of assure maintenance and repairs are completed in compliance with specifications, City standards, time lines and applicable codes and regulations. *Provide technical guidance and training; schedule safety and other training sessions; attend a variety of meetings to discuss and plan maintenance operations and activities; attend related safety seminars and committee meetings. *Coordinate the distribution of supplies and equipment to personnel; develop estimated replacement costs and equipment specifications; test and requisition equipment and supplies; purchase supplies as needed within established procedures and policies; maintain inventory of spare parts, building maintenance and operating supplies. FACILITIES SUPERVISOR - ContinuedPage 2 *Communicate with City departments and coordinate maintenance and eustedial needs, procedures, schedules and projects, including testing of security and fire alarm systems4 ilding, building openings, rentals, facility setup and elean-ing, minor building improvements, mechanical and electrical repairs; research and resolve questions, concerns and related issues. *Receive, investigate and resolve complaints and comments from City personnel and the general public; follow up on issues raised as needed. Prepare and maintain a variety of records and reports including schedules, inventories, cost estimates, safety and accident reports, time records, personnel records and hazardous material records; assist in developing and maintaining the annual budget. *Operate a variety of equipment including vehicles, security systems, fire alarms, welding equipment, testing meters and gauges, buffers, hydraulic lifts, power concrete trowels, power line monitor, personal computer for HVAC controls and a variety of hand and power tools. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Methods, materials and equipment used in various building maintenance and repair trades such as plumbing, HVAC, electrical, carpentry and painting. • Building construction practices, codes, regulations and laws governing the construction and repair of municipal building in the City of Renton. • Methods, materials, chemicals, supplies and equipment used in general maintenance and custodial work. • Methods of planning, organizing, prioritizing and scheduling work projects. • Requirements for maintaining facilities in a clean, safe, and orderly condition. • Principles and practices of supervision and training. • City purchasing policies and procedures. • Preventive maintenance schedules and techniques. • Operation and use of power and hand tools and equipment. • Floor maintenance and care. • City organization, operations, policies and objectives. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Health and safety regulations and precautions. • Basic inventory methods and practices. • Proper methods of storing equipment, materials and supplies. • Oral and written communication skills. • Hazardous materials recordkeeping requirements. • Recordkeeping and report writing techniques. FACILITIES SUPERVISOR - ContinuedPage 3 ABILITY TO: • Plan, schedule, prioritize, organize and direct City general maintenance, custodial and scheduling services. • Evaluate the effectiveness of various supplies and equipment. • Estimate, research and purchase quantity and types of supplies and materials needed. • Train, supervise and evaluate personnel. • Maintain records and prepare reports. • Inspect facilities for maintenance and repair needs and safety issues. • Interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, policies and procedures. • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships. • Work independently with little direction. • Meet schedules and time lines. • Observe legal and defensive driving practices. • Instruct others in the proper methods, use and care of tools, materials and equipment used in building maintenance and repair, including mechanical, electrical, plumbing, HVAC and energy -monitoring systems. • Lift objects up to 50 pounds. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: graduation from high school supplemented by courses in electricity, HVAC, plumbing, painting and other construction trades and increasingly responsible building maintenance and repair experience. One year in a supervisory or lead capacity desirable. LICENSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Valid Washington State driver's license. Building Operators Certification (BOC). WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in both an office and field environment. Driving and some physical labor, including lifting objects weighing up to 50 pounds, are also required. *Denotes an essential function :Effective Date: July, 2004 Revision History: August 1994 CITY OF RENTON TITLE: LIBRARIAN LI-2490 CLASS ( ) ' BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Library Director and/or Assistant Library Director, perform professional librarian duties in the operation of a section of library operations such as acquisitions, circulation, children's library or reference; evaluate and select books and materials for a section of the library collection; assist patrons in locating materials and providing information; interview, select, train and provide work direction and guidance to library assistants and pages. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Perform professional librarian duties in the operation of a section of library operations such as acquisitions, circulation, children's library or reference. *Evaluate and select books and materials for a section of the library collection; read reviews, publisher's catalogs and newspapers and visit bookstores to acquire information regarding books for potential selection; maintain library collection. *Provide reference services to patrons seeking information and assistance by telephone or in person; perform computer data base and card catalog subject searches; assist patrons in locating library materials. *Provide inter -library loan services to patrons for materials unavailable in City libraries; use computer network to locate and acquire books from other libraries. *Compile and maintain lists of special collections, including cassettes, periodicals, business and literacy; process new acquisitions, maintain updated database and prepare holding lists. *Organize and prepare displays, bulletin boards and other informational media to promote interest in reading and to provide information to patrons and the community. *Communicate with vendors and sales people regarding the purchase of books, materials and equipment; evaluate books for discarding or reordering. *Plan, organize, publicize and conduct special programs; conduct library tours periodically. Librarian - Continued Page 2 *Prepare and maintain a variety of library records including material collections, statistics and government publications. *Interview, select, train and assign the duties of library assistants and pages as assigned. Direct circulation operations; assure adequate staffing levels to meet public desk needs; answer complex questions and issues. *Remain current with library technologies and automation; read literature, attend conferences and visit other library sites; install and update computer programs; answer hardware and software questions; train library personnel in computer use and interact with City data processing personnel. Create, design, plan and implement a summer reading program; develop and maintain current knowledge of the home schooling movement and build a collection supportive of those involved. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Methods, practices, procedures and terminology of a library. • Principles and methods of reading. • Operations, functions and maintenance of a public library. • Reference and bibliographic tools and techniques. • Bibliographic database searching techniques utilizing library -specific computers, programs and terminals. • Information retrieval from reference materials and computer database. • Dewey Decimal system of classification. • Library of Congress system of classification. • Maintain records and prepare reports. • Library technical processes related to the acquisition, cataloging, classification and circulation of library materials. • Proper methods of storing equipment, materials and supplies. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Record -keeping techniques. ABILITY TO: • Perform professional librarian duties over an assigned section of library operations. • Plan and organize projects, programs and operational activities. Librarian - Continued Page 3 • Perform technical library duties related to the acquisition, classification, cataloging, circulation and processing of books, periodicals and other library materials. • Catalog and index library books, periodicals and materials. • Locate materials quickly upon request. • Evaluate, select and organize library materials. • Assign and review the work of others. • Train, supervise and evaluate personnel. • Maintain current knowledge of program rules, regulations, requirements and restrictions. • Train and provide work direction to others. • Learn automated library systems and search techniques. • Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action. • Operate a computer terminal to enter data, maintain records and generate reports. • Learn the operation and use of an automated library circulation system and bibliographic database searching techniques using computer databases. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: Master's degree in Library Science and one year of experience in the assigned area of responsibility. LICENSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Washington State Librarian Certificate. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in an office environment. Some non-standard work hours may be required. November 1998 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al � ' AI �:YJ Submitting Data: Transportation Systems For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works November 22, 2004 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Robert Lochmiller, x7303 Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Subject: Strander Boulevard/SW 27`h Street Connection Project Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Ordinance ............. (CAG 03-033) Resolution............" Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Vicinity Map Information......... Project Allocation Transfer Supplemental Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Refer to Transportation Committee Finance Dept ...... Fiscal Impact: 317.12239.016.5950.0000.67.000000 Expenditure Required... $197,437 Transfer/Amendment....... $197,437 Amount Budgeted....... $2,505,460 ('03 —'05) Revenue Generated......... 0 Total Project Budget $2,505,460 City Share Total Project. $197,437 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Supplemental Agreement provides for the design work needed to complete PS&E plans for Phase 1 — Segment 1 of the project. Segment 1 will construct a new east -west arterial roadway between Oakesdale Avenue SW and the east side of the Burlington Northern Santa F6 Railroad (BNSF) tracks where the future overcrossing will begin. The first stage of the project will provide access to the southern end of the Boeing Longacres site where the proposed Federal Reserve Bank will be located. It is in the City's interest to complete construction of Segment 1 before the opening of the Federal Reserve Bank. Total project budget (2003-2005) is $2,505,460. An additional $197,437 will be needed to complete additional work identified in the supplement to complete the full design of a portion of this project along SW 27th Street west of Oakesdale Avenue SW. A transfer of funds from two projects will be needed to cover the supplement. $138,000 will come from the Benson Road/S. 31" Street Traffic Signal project, which has been delayed. The remaining funding will come from the Transit Priority Signal System project, which can cover the additional budget allocation needed of $59,437. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Transportation Systems Division recommends that: $197,437 be transferred to the Strander Boulevard/SW 271h Street Connection Project to complete the full design for a portion of this roadway by transferring these funds from the Benson Road/S. 3 1 " Street Traffic Signal Project ($138,000) and the Transit Priority Signal Project ($59,437). Staff further recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Supplemental Agreement with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for additional preliminary engineering services in the amount of $197,437. N:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TArADMIN\DIR's working files\Standerphasel041102 Agenda Bill -Supplement I.dm CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ' ,) Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor �l FROM: Gregg Zimmerml, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Robert Lochmiller, x7303 SUBJECT: Strander Boulevard/SW 27�h Street Connection Project Supplemental Agreement No. 1 (CAG 03-033) ISSUE: Approve the supplemental agreement for additional preliminary engineering services to complete the plans and specifications for Phase 1- Segment 1 of the Strander Boulevard/SW 27a, Street Connection Project. RECOMMENDATION: The Transportation Systems Division recommends that: $197,437 be transferred to the Strander Boulevard/SW 27"' Street Connection Project to complete the full design for a portion of this roadway by transferring these funds from the Benson Road/S. 3 1 " Street Traffic Signal Project ($138,000) and the Transit Priority Signal Project ($59,437). Staff further recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Supplemental Agreement with Perteet Engineering, Inc. for additional preliminary engineering services in the amount of $197,437. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: This 1.2-mile project will include a new roadway that joins the existing intersection of Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway in Tukwila to the intersection of SW 27`}' Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW in Renton. The project will also improve the existing SW 276, Street from Oakesdale Avenue SW to East Valley Road. This project is an important east -west trans - valley connection targeted at improving access and mobility for the traveling public, freight, and businesses. When constructed it will provide access to the development at the Boeing Longacres site and the Tukwila Transit Center, and provide a grade -separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa F6 (BNSF) railroad tracks. Segment 1 will construct a new east -west arterial roadway between Oakesdale Avenue SW and the east side of the BNSF tracks where the future overcrossing will begin. The first stage of the project will provide access to the southern end of the Boeing Longacres site where the proposed Federal Reserve Bank will be located. It is in the City's interest to complete construction of Segment I before the opening of the Federal Reserve Bank. Strander Blvd / SW 27th Street Connection, Phase 1 11 /12/2004 Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street Connection Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Project Allocation Transfer 2004 New 2004 TIP # Project Proj. # Allocation Transfer . Allocation 3 Strander Design 12239 1,080,000 197,437 1,277,437 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st St Signal 12129 138,500 (138,000) 500 49 Transit Priority Signal Project 12174 678,900 (59,437) 619,463 $1,897,400 $ - $1,897,400 Original Contract - 3/26/03 $ 2,213,349 Supplemental Agreement No. 1 197,437 New Contract Amount $2,410,786 Scope TIP Year Allocation Original contract: 30% Design - 2003 $ 625,460 West Valley to East Valley (Phase 2004 1,080,000 1, Segments 1 & 2, and Phase 2) 2005 800,000 Supplement No. 1: 100% Design of Phase 1, Segment 1 197,437 Total for contract & staff time $ 2,505,460 sgriffin\projects\Strander Transfer Nov 2004 Washington State Department of Transportation Organization and Address - Supplemental Agreement Perteet Inc. 2707 Colby Avenue Suite 900 Everett, WA 98201 Agreement Number CAG 03-033 Project Number Phone 425-252-7700 J Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Strander Boulevard Extension $ 2,410,786.00 Description of Work Prepare construction documents for a portion of the Strander Boulevard Extension between Oakesdale Avenue and the eastern end of the future overcrossing of the BNSF railroad tracks The Local Agency of City of Renton desires to supplement the agreement entered into with and executed on 3/26/2003 Perteet Engineering, Inc. CAG 03-033 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. and identified as Agreement No. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: The- original scone- of services is amended to include, addition al servims, as described in detail in the, ntrache-n Exhihit .4.». 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Completion Date - May 31, 2005 Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. Consuftant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140.063 EF Revised 10/97 Exhibit `B" — Supplemental Agreement No. 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Strander Boulevard Extension OA KESDALE AVENUE TO BOEING ACCESS — PHASE 1, PS&E INTRODUCTION This work effort (Work Order 2) was identified as requiring a supplement in the original Strander Boulevard Extension agreement. This phase of the project will construct a new east -west arterial roadway between Oakesdale Avenue and the east side of the Burlington Northern Railroad (BNSF) tracks where the future overcrossing will begin. This first phase project will provide access to the southern end of the Boeing Longacres site. It will match the future alignment of the Strander Boulevard Extension anticipated to be constructed in future phases. GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICES This scope of work includes preparation of contract documents including plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the final design of the segment of the Strander Boulevard Extension between Oakesdale Avenue and the internal access points into the Boeing Longacres site. The final design will be based on the 30% plans prepared for the City of Renton in July, 2004. At the option of the City, the Consultant may be asked to provide construction management services for some or all of the construction contracts. WORK ORDER 2 — Plans, Specifications, and Estimates for Phase 1 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.1 Provide continuous project management administration (billing invoices, monthly progress reports, consultant/subconsultant coordination) throughout this phase of the project's duration. 1.2 Prepare, monitor, and update project schedule. Schedule will be developed using MS Project 2000. Monitor project budget. 1.3 Attend bi-weekly coordination/discussion meetings with key City staff, and attend other meetings as requested. A total of 8 meetings not included elsewhere are anticipated. Prepare and distribute meeting minutes. 1.4 Prepare a work plan at the start of project for the project including communication plan, deliverables, quality control plan and procedures for change management. 1.5 Prepare independent QA/QC plan reviews of PS&E submittals (60%, 90% and final) by senior staff. 1.6 Conduct in-house technical reviews at the 60%, 90% and final levels, separate from and a minimum of one week prior to the plan reviews to analyze constructability and correlate plans and reports with the intent of the project and this scope of services. These reviews will be conducted with principal staff members. 2.0 UTILITY DESIGN & COORDINATION DOT Form 140-089EF Page 2 Stmnder Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 ME Revised 12/99 City of Renton 2.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with the various public and private utilities along the route. Items in this task shall include: • Preparing and maintaining a utility coordination checklist. • Coordinating and attending up to (2) meetings with franchises (start of project and 60% design) and prepare meeting minutes. • Identifying potential utility conflicts and pothole locations (Note: potholing will be accomplished by the utility franchises). • Incorporate utility information into the plans as required for clarification. • Meet with utility companies and the City to resolve individual conflicts by either design revision or utility relocation. 2.2 The Consultant shall prepare utility drawings for the water line and sewer mains to be constructed within the right-of-way of Strander Blvd. The utility drawings will be based upon the plan and profile sheets developed for the paving and grading plans. For planning purposes, 5 plan and profile sheets and 2 detail sheets were assumed for the project. The water and sewer lines will be redlined by city of staff and drafted by the consultant. The consultant will prepare the vertical and horizontal alignment at the 60% submittal. The 90% submittal will include refinements to the alignment and all necessary details. The city will prepare all special provisions for the sewer and water and will submit them to the consultant for incorporation into the bid documents at the 90% submittal. Quantities and construction estimates will be prepared by the city. The Consultant will provide the City with necessary bid schedule files. 3.0 STORM DRAINAGE This final storm drainage design is only for the first phase portion of the Strander Blvd. road extension described in the introduction. The drainage detention and stormwater quality treatment facilities for Strander Blvd. are to be constructed within Tract D, which is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Strander Blvd, and Oakesdale Avenue. This is to be a combined drainage facility to serve the areas from both Strander Boulevard and the proposed bank site. The drainage detention and stormwater quality treatment facilities for both land areas are to be designed in accordance with the Washington Department of Ecology "Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington", 2001 ("WDOE Manual"). Storm conveyance is to be designed in accordance with the City of Renton standards, because the WDOE manual does not address design standards for conveyance. This scope of work is based upon the understanding that there will be a single storm outfall located at the low area next to Tract D for the majority of the project. The eastern 250 feet of Strander Blvd can not be conveyed to this location and will be treated separately. Because this drainage facility will be a joint use with the bank site, close coordination is needed with the civil site engineer for the bank site. The following assumptions are made for budget purposes: • The civil engineer for the bank site will prepare all drainage calculation, reports and construction drawings for the combined detention water quality facility. Perteet will prepare a basin map for Strander and provided it to the banks engineer for use in determining the drainage calculations. ■ The civil engineer for the bank site is to provide Perteet with drainage connection point locations and elevations. DOT Form 140-089EF Page 3 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12/99 City of Renton ■ Any changes made to the detention and water quality plans or drainage basin after Perteet commences drainage design for 60% plans, which require re -doing drainage calculations or plans, will be performed as additional service. Perteet will review the drainage calculations, reports and drawings for the Tract D drainage facility that will be provided by the Bank Facilities Engineer (KPFF). The review will verify that the design of the detention and water quality facility in Tract D that will serve both the Bank site and Strander Blvd projects accurately accounts for the runoff from Strander Blvd and meets the 2001 WDOE manual requirements. The storm drainage design will be performed under the following tasks: 3.1 For the portion of drainage not going to Tract D, prepare a concept drainage plan layout for detention and stormwater quality treatment that shows a schematic layout of the storrtt facilities. This will be submitted to the City for comment prior to commencing 60% PS&E and drainage design. The drainage basins will be prepared by Perteet and submitted to City of Renton, and concurrence acquired prior to commencing the other tasks in this scope. 3.2 Prepare engineering calculations for stormwater detention facilities to serve Strander Boulevard Blvd. not discharging to Tract D. Determine the size, location and dimensions. This will be prepared for the 60%, 90110 and 100% PS&E submittals. The hydrologic calculations will be done using the WWHM model, which is the accepted continuous simulation model identified in the WDOE standards. 3.3 Provide preliminary sizes of storm pipes for the 60% submittal and prepare final storm conveyance calculations at the 90% submittal. The conveyance system design will be done in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 3.4 Perform a backwater analysis of the storm pipe system in Strander Blvd. phase 1. The analysis will be done using "King County Backwater" (KCBW) software, or similar program which uses the standard step method to calculate the hydraulic grade line. The backwater analysis will be done for the 25-yr storm and 100-yr design events, taken from the design water level in the proposed drainage pond which will be located down -gradient of the road project, known as Tract D. The water surface elevation in the pond is to be provided by the consultant who is designing the pond, identified as KPFF. Gutter flow and grate inlet calculations for Strander Blvd. will be performed for the 25-yr and 100-yr storm event. The gutter flow depth and width will be determined using Manning equation, and grate inlet capacities shall be performed based upon FHWA procedures. 3.5 Prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), and submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) application to the Washington Department of Ecology. The Client will publish the public notice, associated with this NOI. 4.0 ENGINEERING DESIGN (60 %) Construction plans for the preferred design alternative will be prepared for the project, based on the July DOT Form 140-089EF Page 4 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12/99 City of Renton 2004 preferred alternative submitted to the City, and the storm drainage system selected as part of Task 3.1 above. It is assumed that the plans will fit on five "base sheets", utilizing 22" by 34" sheets at 1-inch = 20-inch scale. The 60% plans will include all necessary sheets cut. Construction details and notes may be missing for the 60% submittal. 4.1 COVER SHEET (1 sheet, not to scale) 4.2 LEGEND AND ABBREVIATION SHEET (i sheet, not to scale) 4.3 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONS SHEET(I sheet, not to scale) 4.4 SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL PLAN (I sheet, not to scale) These plans will include alignment information, vertical control and horizontal control used for the project. These will provide the construction surveyors with all the necessary control to stake the construction project. 4.5 EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN(5 sheet, 1"=20' scale) 4.6 PAVING AND GRADING PLANS & DETAILS (6 sheets). These plans will include horizontal alignment information, paving limits, limits of cut/fill required and earth retaining systems. Right-of-way needs will be determined from these plans. 4.7 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLANS (5 sheets). Prepare construction plans and details of the drainage detention and water quality facilities. If concrete vaults are used, Perteet will provide construction plans and specifications showing vaults size, location and elevations. These plans will not include structural plans and details. It is presumed that structural plans are to be prepared by the contractor's vault supplier. Perteet will prepare performance specifications for the vault, to ensure proper size, dimensioning, strength, and leak -proof characteristics. 4.8 STORMWATER FACILITIES AND DETAILS(3 sheets) For the portion of the road not draining to Tract D, Perteet will provide plans and specifications showing vault size, location and elevations, unless an alternative method for treating the runoff from this area is selected For concrete vaults, Perteet will provide construction plans and specifications showing vaults size, location and elevations. These plans will not include structural plans and details. It is presumed that structural plans are to be prepared by the contractor's vault supplier. Perteet will prepare performance specifications for the vault, to ensure proper size, dimensioning, strength, and leak -proof characteristics 4.9 CHANNELIZATION, SIGNING, ILLUMINATION & DETAILS PLANS (6 sheets). Channelization and signing plans that illustrate the project traffic control. These plans will also include illumination and conduit systems DOT Form 140-089EF Page 5 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12/99 City of Renton 4.10 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS (4 sheets). Traffic Signal plans will be prepared for the Long Acres driveway access. For this phase of work, only the conduits and junction boxes will be constructed. The service cabinet will be constructed to provide service to the roadway illumination. The wiring, loops, poles, and controller cabinet will not be constructed. 4.11 LANDSCAPING PLANS & DETAILS (18 SHEETS) The landscaping plans will be based upon a meeting held with Renton Parks Department. Items such as tree type, tree space, groundcover type, and irrigation requirements will be discussed at the meeting. It is anticipated that the primary focus of the landscaping will be in the planter strips between the sidewalks and in any planted medians identified in the plans. Some focal - point plantings may occur within the right-of-way at the intersection of Oakdale Blvd. The landscaping plans will include 1"=20' planting and irrigation plans, planting details, irrigation details, and plant schedule. 4.12 OPINION OF COST An opinion of cost will be prepared based on the 60% plans. The opinion of cost will be based on unit prices, and incorporate about a 15% contingency to account for the level of completeness of plan preparation, and to reflect past experience on similar projects within the region. 5.0 ENGINEERING DESIGN (90%) The 90% Plans will be based upon the 60% plans and comments received from the city. In addition to the 60% plans, the set will include a summary of quantities and specifications these plans will be a complete set of documents, ready for construction with only minor revisions and edits needed. 5.1 COVER SHEET (1 sheet, not to scale) 5.2 LEGNED AND ABBREVIATION (1 sheet, not to scale) 5.3 SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES 5.4 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION (I sheet, not to scale) 5.5 SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL PLAN (I sheet, not to scale) 5.6 EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN(5 sheet, 1"=20' scale) 5.7 PAVING AND GRADING PLANS & DETAILS (6 sheets). 5.8 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLANS (5 sheets). 5.9 STORMWATER FACHdTIES AND DETAILS (3 sheets). DOT Form 140-089EF Page 6 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12/99 City of Renton 5.10 CHANNELIZATION, SIGNING, AND ILLUMINATION PLANS (6 sheets). 5.11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANS (4 sheets). 5.12 LANDSCAPING PLANS & DETAILS (18 SHEETS) 5.13 OPINION OF COST 5.14 SPECIFICATIONS The contract specifications will be a complete bid package based upon the 2004 WSDOT APWA Standard Specifications, including contract documents, amendments, special provisions, standard plans, and wage rates. 6.0 FINAL DESIGN Prepare final contract plans and document. One set of camera ready plans and specification will be provided to the city for use in reproduction. 7.0 BIDDING ASSISTANCE Assist the city during the construction bidding by answering contractor questions and preparing addendums. Attend the bid opening and assist with the bid tabulations. 8.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES Through qualified subconsultant, Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited, preparation of Draft Monitoring Plan as identified in the mitigation plan of the cultural resource discipline report. A draft Monitoring Plan would be prepared to address archeological resources that may be significant and that may be encountered during construction excavation for the project The monitoring plan would include a discussion of construction techniques; an outline of monitoring procedures; a discussion of communication protocol between professional archaeologists, inspectors, and construction personnel; a description of monitoring techniques, including identification of resources and procedures to stop construction and evaluate resources; and reporting requirements to document construction monitoring. Development of the draft Monitoring Plan would require coordination with the City of Renton, the OAHP, and the affected Tribes, and production of a document for review by WSDOT, the OAHP, and the affected Tribes. Preparation of Final Monitoring Plan. A final Monitoring Plan would be produced based on the comments received from the City of Renton, WSDOT, the OAHP, and the affected Tribes. TIME FOR COMPLETION: The work under Supplement 1 of this contract necessary to complete the plans and specifications shall be completed by May 31, 2005. The City may authorize additional time for revisions to the construction contract plans after that date as may be required by project funding and/or construction sequencing. DOT Form 140-089EF Page 7 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12199 City of Renton SUBCONSULTANTS: The following subconsultants will be used to assist in accomplishment of the work: • Hough, Beck & Baird. Inc. - Landscape architecture • Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited - Cultural Resources MINIMUM NOTICE OF MEETING REQUIRING CONSULTANT. PARTICIPATION: Consultant will normally be given a minimum of 24-hour notice of required meeting attendance. ITEMS TO BE PREPARED AND/OR FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT: 1. Copies of minutes of meetings. 2. Monthly progress reports and invoices. 3. Copy of work plan. 4. Copies of QA/QC documents for submittals. 5. List of requested pothole locations. 6. Five half-size copies of 60% plans and opinion of cost. 7. Ten half-size and two full size 90% PS&E submittal. 8. Ten half-size and two full size Final PS&E submittal. 9. Camera-ready plans and specifications for bid document reproduction. ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY: 1. All available "As -Built' and utility information. 2. Existing right-of-way plans and legal descriptions. 3. Drafting standards for preparation of right-of-way and PS&E plans. Standards include CADD layer/line-type/symbol conventions, font specifications, title blocks, line weights, plot setups, CADD project file naming conventions, and survey collector codes. 4. Current amendments, State and City general special provisions, summary of quantity spreadsheet, standard item table and contract boiler plate requirements. 5. Title reports for all parcels along the corridor. 6. Printing of bid sets for advertisement. 7. Three (3) complete sets of bid documents DESIGN CRITERIA: Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of the following: 1. AASHTO 2001, "A Policy of Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" 2. Washington State Department of Transportation, "2004 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal ;nStlfitixi "_ _ --------------------------------------------------- 3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Design Manual." 4. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." DOT Fonn 140-089EF Page 8 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised 12199 City of Renton 5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 7. Highway Research Board's Manual entitled "Highway Capacity." 8. FHWA and Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 9. Standard drawings prepared by City of Renton and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. 10. AASHTO "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities." 11. WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual 12. WSDOT Hydraulics Manual 13. King County Surface Water Design Manual 14. Renton Standard Plans & Specifications 15. Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, 2001 DOT Fonn 140-089EF Page 9 Strander Blvd. Extension- Ph 1 PS&E Revised IM9 City of Renton EXHIBIT G SUBCONTRACTED WORK The AGENCY permits CONSULTANT to subcontract for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT: Hough Beck & Baird, Inc. — Landscape architecture Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited — Cultural Resources Subconsultant must be approved in writing by AGENCY prior to CONSULTANT obtaining services noted above. DOT Form 140-089EF Page 10 Strander Blvd. Eztensiorr Ph 1 PS$E Revised 12/99 City of Renton CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Staff Contact...... Sharon Griffin, ext. 7232 Subject: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Construction, Phase 1, Grant Reimbursement Exhibits: Issue Paper with Attachments Project Profile Sheet (September 2004 Update) Regional TIP Appendix A Resolution Local Agency Agreement 2005-2010 Six -Year TIP Project Sheet Cover Letter/Checklist/Prospectus to WSDOT Grant Application/Vicinity Map Al N: 1 ' 1 , For Agenda of: Nov. 22, 2004 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . M Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Transportation Committee Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: 317.012175 Expenditure Required... $1,121,500 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $1,150,000 ('04,'05) Revenue Generated......... $392,947 (STP) Total Project Budget $1,121,500 City Share Total Project.. $728,553 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City of Renton applied for and was awarded $392,947 in federal Surface Transportation Program/Urban (STP/U) Countywide funds to be distributed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The grant was awarded to all phases of the project. This submittal is to obligate funds for Phase 1 construction improvements on Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) in the vicinity of the I-405 ramps. Phase 1 will construct a new signal, move the Cedar River Park entrance approximately 670 feet to the east, and construct mitigating measures for Phases 1 and 2. The City must enter into an agreement with WSDOT to receive the grant funding. The attached issue paper provides more background information about the project and the phasing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement between the City of Renton and the WSDOT, and that Council authorize the resolution. H:\SGriffin\Agenda Bills\AB 2004 STP(U) SR 169 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2004 TO: Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: -` Kathy Keolker-Wheele ayor SF FROM: Gregg Zimmermah; A ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Sharon Griffin, ext. 7232 SUBJECT: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Construction, Phase 1, Grant Reimbursement ISSUE: Enter into a Local Agency agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for grant reimbursement for the Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), Phase 1, roadway construction project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement between the City of Renton and WSDOT, and that Council authorize the resolution. BACKGROUND: • The project was split into phases in 2003 to define the parameters for Council approval of $1,216,000 in Metro mitigation funds for Phase 1 of this project. See the attached project profile sheet for definition of project phases and funding breakdown. • Phase 1 is expected to go to advertisement in January 2005 for construction in Spring 2005. • The proposed $765,993 of 2004 TEA-21 Countywide funds is not shown since it is still pending WSDOT approval in November 2004. Important reasons to obligate funds for Phase 1: 1. Potential loss of funds: Federal funds' in the amount of $392,947 were awarded to the SR 169 project in 2002. The expected obligation date of the funds is July 1, 2005, (see ' Transportation Efficiency Act 21 Surface Transportation Program/Urban (TEA 21 STP/U) Countywide funds. 2 Transportation Improvement Program Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Construction, Phase 1 November 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 attached Appendix A, Regional TIP2 project sheet). If the deadline is not met, or the extension not approved, the City of Renton stands to lose the funds; the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) could reprogram them through the Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC). 2. Future phase funding unknown: PSRC has implemented a project tracking system. We have one year from the expected obligation date (July 1, 2005), or until July 1, 2006, to obligate these funds or request a one-time extension from PSRC. Funding for Phase 2 and 3 is still unknown; therefore, it would be difficult to guarantee use of the federal funds for these phases prior to the deadline. By using the federal funds earlier, we can use the supplanted funds at a later stage of the project. 3. Eligibility: Phase 1 has been designed and processed per federal funding requirements. Therefore, it is eligible for consideration. 4. Applicability: There is independent utility for Phase 1 of the project that should be important to the State and federal agencies reviewing the request. Besides providing some of the mitigating factors for Phase 2, Phase 1 will relocate the Cedar River Park entrance 670 feet east, away from the I-405 ramps. This will provide congestion relief and reduce accidents. The project phasing has been discussed with WSDOT staff concerning the funding obligation for Phase 1 only. A routine amendment has been submitted to PSRC to split the project into phases in the regional TIP. This amendment was submitted by PSRC to WSDOT in mid - October for their State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) approval in mid - November. Attachments cc: Sandra Meyer Nick Afzali Leslie Lahndt Rob Lochmiller Sharon Griffin Nancy Violante Project File H:\SGriffin\Issue Papers\IP SR 169 Federal funding 11-04 SR 169 Improvements at I-405 and 1401h Way SE Renton, WA Project Lead City of Renton Project Description This project will improve capacity and safety along SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) from Sunset Boulevard North to Blaine Drive SE in the I-405 area, and at 1401h Way SE. This is a high volume, high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools can be achieved cost effectively. Project Elements Phase 1: Install a new signal and relocate the Cedar River Park entrance away from the I-405 ramps. Construct mitigating measures for Phases 1 and 2. Phase 2: Construct an eastbound drop right - turn and acceleration lane, a westbound right -turn lane (1,500 lineal feet) and queue jump lane, traffic islands, widen sidewalks, modify and interconnect signals, and provide transit signal priority. Phase 3: At 140`h Way SE, construct an eastbound right -turn lane and westbound HOV lane. Project Status Task 2004 2005 Pending Funding Design/Environmental - Phases 1, 2 & 3 �s Construction — Phase 1 ®— ROW — Phase 2 Construction — Phase 2 Construction — Phase 3 Design engineering for Phases 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Environmental documents are approved. Phase 1 is expected to go to construction early 2005. Phase 2 right-of- way payment and construction schedule is pending funding. It could be done by June 2005, pending funding. Summary of Benefits • Improves existing high level of traffic congestion and accidents by implementing traffic safety enhancements through roadway geometrics and improved signalization. • Improves movement for employers and workers to and from Renton industrial areas and job centers; improves freight movement. • Doubles westbound left -turn storage at southbound on -ramp; improves merging conditions for northbound off -ramp to eastbound SR 169; significantly improves LOS with 65% reduction in delay. Funding Status Partial funding has been identified from the following sources: City of Renton, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), federal funds (STP) and private sector match. Funded $ 3,509,500 Unfunded $ 4,586,000 Total Project $ 8,095,500 Funding Source Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 City of Renton 1,287,900 204,000 50,000 Renton Private Mitigation 422,500 403,100 WSDOT 300,000 450,000 Federal Funds - STP 392,000 Undetermined 2,286,000 2,300,000 Total Funding $ 2,010,400 $ 3,735,100 $ 2,350,000 September 2004 Update County: King Appendix A as of the 04-07 Amendment: Approved 8/05/04 Jurisdiction: Renton Project Number: REN-18 TRIP- Manlo Vail— ul k....,.. teo 4CM uw . rlinsv Hwara Ket. Prog. Year Oblig. Date Funding Source PIE -Design Federal Funds State/Local Funds Other Funds Phase Total 2003 1/1/03 Local ROW $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000 2003 1/1/03 Local $0 $0 $529,000 $529,000 Construction Construction 2005 1/1/05 Local $0 $0 $5,775,726 $5,775,726 02-05-KGCO-21 2005 7/1/05 ' 'STP(U) $392,947 $61,327 $450,000 $904,274 First Year Programmed: 2003 WSDOT PINS Totals: $392,947 d $61,327 $7,554,726 $8,009,000 Federal Aid/FTA Grant Number(s): Functional Class: Principal Arterial - Other OVER 5,000 Improvement Type: -Major Widening - HOV Lane(s) Location: Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) From: Near 1-405 To: 140th Way SE Est. Total Project Cost: Regionally Significant Yes Environmental Status: Documented CE MTP Status: Candidate MTP Reference(s): 1607 Description: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes and provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on the Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) at 140th Way SE, and between the 1-405 southbound and northbound freeway ramps. Involves roadway widening at intersection approaches and modifications to channelization and to traffic signals. Also Includes widening to improve the northbound on -ramp and southbound off -ramp movement at the 1-405/SR-169 interchange. Improve access to Cedar River Park and Stoneway site through traffic modifications. WSDOT has committed $300,000 to design and an additional $450,000 to construction. King County committed approximately $275,000 to this project by constructing a holding pond at 140th Way SE for our use. The project is at 30% design. 8/5/04 A - 104 Appendix A: Project Descriptions CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) FOR FUNDING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAPLE VALLEY (SR 169) HOV LANES AND QUEUE JUMP IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the Maple Valley Highway from Interstate 405 to 140'hWay SE currently has a high volume of traffic and is a high congestion corridor; and WHEREAS, the proposed HOV lanes and queue jump improvements will provide travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools on a cost-efficient basis; and WHEREAS, the queue jumps and bypass lanes will provide transit priority signal improvements near I-405 northbound and southbound ramps and at 140'' Way SE; and WHEREAS, the federal government, through the Washington State Department of Transportation, is willing to provide the City with $392,947 out of the .projected construction cost of$1,150,000; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which such funds will be provided to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton will be seeking additional grant funds from the Washington State Department of Transportation to construct further phases of this project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation entitled "Local Agency Agreement for Maple Valley (SR 169) HOV lanes and Queue Jump Improvements" SECTION III. The Mayor and City Clerk are further authorized to enter into such further agreements necessary to obtain additional grant funds from the Washington State Department of Transportation to construct further phases of this project, but shall keep the City Council advised of the receipt of such additional grant funds, the total cost of this project, and the progress and local funding for the project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12004. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1072:9/27/04:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor M 2 7vF Washington State ��A Department of Transportation Local Agency Agreement Agency City of Renton Address 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 CFDA No. 20.205 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) Project No. Agreement No. For OSC WSDOT Use Only The Local Agency having complied, or hereby agreeing to comply, with the terms and conditions set forth in (1) Title 23, U.S. Code Highways, (2) the regulations issued pursuant thereto, (3) Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102, A-87 and A-133, (4) the policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation, and (5) the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal Government, relative to the above project, the Washington State Department of Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to proceed on the project by a separate notification. Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein on line r, column 3, without written authority by the State, subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administration. All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency. Project Description Name Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) HOV Lanes & Queue Jump Improvements, Ph. 1 Length 0.65 miles Termini Interstate 405 Ramp Area and 140th Way SE Description of Work Ph. 1: Install new signal; relocate Park entrance away from I-405 ramps (approx. 670 feet); construct mitigating measures. (Ph. 2: Construct an eastbound drop right -turn and acceleration lane (approx. 1,000 ft.), a westbound right -turn and queue jump lane (approx. 1,500 ft.), traffic islands; modify and interconnect signals; provide transit priority; widen sidewalks. Ph. 3: 140th Way SE, construct eastbound right -turn lane and westbound HOV lane.) Type of Work Estimate of Funding Estimated Total Project Funds ) EstimatedAgency Funds Estimated Federal Funds PE a. Agency % b.Other -- - I c. Other -- _ Federal Aid Participation d. State Ratio for PE e. Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d Right of Way f. Agency .Other iL h. Other Federal Aid i. State Participation Ratio for RW i. Total R/W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i Construction k. Contract 1,000,000.00 658,307.007j341,693.00 I. Other Consultant 45,000.00 29,624.0015,376.00 m. Other Franchise Utilities 60,000.00 39,498.00 20,502.00 n. Other 34.17 % o.Agency 35,000.00 23,041.00 11,9 99.00 Federal Aid Participation State p• 10,000.00 6,583.00 3,417.00 Ratio for CN q. Total CN Cost Estimate k+I+m+n+o+ 1,150,000.001 757,053.001 392,947.00 r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q) 1,150,000.001 757,053.001 392,947.00 Agency Official By Washington State Department of Transportation By Title Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs Date Executed DOT Form 140-039 EF Revised 01/2004 Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award ❑ Method A - Advance Payment - Agency Share of total construction cost (based on contract award) ❑ Method B - Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction cost (line 4, column 2) in the amounf of at $ Local Force or Local Ad and Award ® Method C - Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement Provisions I. Scope of Work per month for months. The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures; and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below. Adopted by official action on The Agency shall provide all the work, labor, materials, and services necessary to perform the project which is described and set forth in detail in the "Project Description" and "Type of Work." When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency, the State shall be deemed an agent of the Agency and shall perform the services described and indicated in "Type of Work" on the face of this agreement, in accordance with plans and specifications as proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration. When the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right of control by the Agency, the State shall have the right to perform the work subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration. IL Delegation of Authority The State is willing to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Government by the administration of this project. The Agency agrees that the State shall have the full authority to carry out this administration. The State shall review. process, and approve documents required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance with federal requirements. If the State advertises and awards the contract. the State will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested by the Agency. If the Local Agency advertises and awards the project, the State shall review the work to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications. III. Project Administration Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on this project as requested by the Agency and described in the Type of Work above. In addition, the State will furnish qualified personnel for the supervision and inspection of the work in progress. On Local Agency advertised and awarded projects, the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all work is in conformance with approved plans, specifications, and federal aid requirements. The salary of such engineer or other supervisor and all other salaries and costs incurred by State forces upon the project will be considered a cost thereof. All costs related to this project incurred by employees of the State in the customary manner on highway payrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project. IV. Availability of Records All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expenditures kept by the Agency are to be maintained in accordance with local government accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington State Auditor's Office, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. The records shall be open to inspection by the State and Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made available for such inspection for a period of not less than three years from the final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency. Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or Federal Government upon request. V. Compliance with Provisions The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing by the State for each classification. The classifications of work for projects are: Resolution/Ordinance No. 1. Preliminary engineering. 2. Right of way acquisition. 3. Project construction. In the event that right of way acquisition, or actual construction of the road, for which preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the closing of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the agreement is executed, the Agency will repay to the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement (see Section IX). The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to provide the initially planned complete facility within the limits of this project will conform to at least the minimum values set by approved statewide design standards applicable to this class of highways, even though such additional work is financed without federal aid participation. The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects, the current federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated damages relative to the basis of federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within the contract time. VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement The total cost of the project, including all review and engineering costs and other expenses of the State, is to be paid by the Agency and by the Federal Government. Federal finding shall be in accordance with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21), as amended, and Office of Management and Budget circulars A-102, A-87 and A-133. The State shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project. The Agency shall be ultimately responsible for all costs associated with the project which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project. The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in conformity with applicable federal and state laws. The agency shall mimimize the time elapsed between receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs. Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance, general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be eligible for federal participation unless an indirect cost plan has been approved by WSDOT. The State will pay for State incurred costs on the project. Following payment, the State shall bill the Federal Government for reimbursement of those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are attributable and properly allocable to this project. The State shall bill the Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government (see Section IX). 1. Project Construction Costs Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement. DOT Form 140-039 EF 2 Revised 01/2004 Method A — The Agency will place with the State, within (20) days after the execution of the construction contract, an advance in the amount of the Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract award. The State will notify the Agency of the exact amount to be deposited with the State. The State will pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of progress billings from the contractor. Following such payments, the State will submit a billing to the Federal Government for the federal aid participation share of the cost. When the project is substantially completed and final actual costs of the project can be determined, the State will present the Agency with a final billing showing the amount due the State or the amount due the Agency. This billing will be cleared by either a payment from the Agency to the State or by a refund from the State to the Agency. Method B — The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on the face of this agreement shall be withheld from its monthly fuel tar allotments. The face of this agreement establishes the months in which the withholding shall take place and the exact amount to be withheld each month. The extent of withholding will be confirmed by letter from the State at the time of contract award. Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor, the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its participating portion of such billings. Method C — The Agency may submit vouchers to the State in the format prescribed by the State, in duplicate, not more than once per month for those costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly attributable and properly allocable to this project. Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance, general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan. The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project costs up to the amount shown on the face of this agreement. At the time of audit. the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project. The State shall bill the Agency for all costs incurred by the State relative to the project. The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation (see Section IX). VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts The Agency, if services of a consultant are required, shall be responsible for audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible federal aid costs on the project. The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's tiles and made available to the State and the Federal Government. An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards as issued by the United States General Accounting Office by the Comptroller General of the United States; WSDOT Manual M 27-50, Consultant Authorization, Selection, and Agreement Administration; memoranda of understanding between WSDOT and FHWA; and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. If upon audit it is found that overpayment or participation of federal money in ineligible items of cost has occurred, the Agency shall reimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation (see Section IX). VIII. Single Audit Act The Agency, as a subrecipient of federalfunds, shall adhere to the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 as well as all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. A subrecipient who expends $500,000 or more in federal awards from all sources during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program -specific audit performed for that year in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133. Upon conclusion of the A-133 audit, the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State. IX. Payment of Billing The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of the State's billing relative to the project (e.g., State force work, project cancellation, overpayment, cost ineligible for federal participation, etc.) is not made to the State within 45 days after the Agency has been billed, the State shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel tar allotments to the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund. No additional Federal project funding will be approved until full payment is received unless otherwise directed the Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs. X. Traffic Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway Maintenance The Agency will not permit any changes to be made in the provisions for parking regulations and traffic control on this project without prior approval of the State and Federal Highway Administration. The Agency will not install or permit to be installed any signs. signals, or markings not in conformance with the standards approved by the Federal Highway Administration and MUTCD. The Agency will, at its own expense, maintain the improvement covered by this agreement. XI. Indemnity The Agency shall hold the Federal Government and the State harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits, whether at law or equity brought against the Agency, State, or Federal Government, arising from the Agency's execution, performance, or failure to perform any of the provisions of this agreement, or of any other agreement or contract connected with this agreement, or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal Government in the project, PROVIDED, nothing herein shall require the Agency to reimburse the State or the Federal Government for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State. XII. Nondiscrimination Provision No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein. The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any USDOT-assisted contract and/or agreement or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements. The WSDOT's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by USDOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.). The Agency hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, the required contract provisions for Federal -Aid Contracts (FHWA 1273), located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines. The Agency further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided, that if the applicant so participating is a State or Local Government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the contract. The Agency also agrees: (1) To assist and cooperate actively with the State in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (2) To furnish the State such information as it may require for the supervision of such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the State in the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance. (3) To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order. (4) To carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration, or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part 11, subpart D of the Executive Order. DOT Form 140-039 EF Revised 01/2004 3 XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action In addition, the Agency agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings. the State may take any or all ofthe following actions: (a) Cancel, terminate. or suspend this agreement in whole or in part: (b) Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency; and (c) Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. XIII. Liquidated Damages The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages provisions of 23 CFR Part 635, Subpart 127, as supplemented, relative to the amount of Federal participation in the project cost, shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within the contract time. Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in accordance with this paragraph. XIV. Termination for Public Convenience The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may terminate the contract in whole. or from time to time in part. whenever: (1) The requisite federal finding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise. (2) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work as a direct result of an Executive Order of the President with respect to the prosecution of war or in the interest of national defense, or an Executive Order of the President or Governor of the State with respect to the preservation of energy resources. (3) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work by reason of a preliminary, special, or permanent restraining order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the contractor. (4) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State. For the convenience of the parties to this contract, it is agreed that any claims and/or causes of action which the Local Agency has against the State of Washington, growing out of this contract or the project with which it is concerned, shall be brought only in the Superior Court for Thurston County. XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying The approving authority certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment_ or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit the Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, and contracts and subcontracts under grants, subgrants, loans, and cooperative agreements) which exceed $100,000, and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Additional Provisions DOT Form 140-039 EF Revised 01/2004 4 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7nna 7n4n [,Iv vrn- rm SR 169 HOV - 140th Way SE to SR-900 Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12175 RANK: 4 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes that provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) STATUS: WSDOT has committed $300,000 to design and an additional $450,000 to at 140th Way SE and in the area 1-405. Involves roadway widening at intersection approaches and modifications to channelization and traffic signals. Also includes construction. King County committed approximately $275,000 to this project by constructing a holding pond at 140th widening to improve the north -bound on ramp and south -bound off ramp movement at the 1-405/SR 169 interchange. Way SE for our use. Design is complete for total buildout; design revisions are underway for Improve access to Cedar River Park and Stoneway site through traffic modifications. Phase 1 only. Received TEA-21 Countywide grant of $392,947 for construction; requested another $767,586. JUSTIFICATION: This is a high volume, high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools can be achieved with high cost effectiveness. Also CHANGES: The portion of the work at 1-405 will now be phased. Phase 1 will construct the signal, access road there are severe congestion and safety problems that can be addressed by adding a right turn lane west -bound on SR-169 and a right turn lane from and parking lot. Phase 2 will construct the widening improvements on SR 169. Funding shown in protected the 1-405 northbound off ramp on to east -bound SR-169. 2004 and 2005 will design and construct Phase 1. Council allocated $1.2 million for Phase 1 work from the King County Metro mitigation fund. Funds increased by approx. $86,000 due to additional design for project phasing. Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2005 Funded :13.826.025 Unfunded :14,269.467 ITEM Programmed. Sent Pre-2004 2004 Total EXPENSES: Six -Year Pro ram 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Pro'ect Development Precon En /Admin 886 492 755,392 76,000 55,100 R-O-W includes Admin 529,000 55 100 29 500,000 Construction Contract Fee 5,900,0001 00 00 4 900 000 500 000 Construction En /Admin 780,000 640,000 2,100,0 10,000 2,500,000a2,35O,OOO Other 380,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,095,492 755,392 1,245,000 6,095,100 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 10,000 55,100 3,680,000 112 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 257 892 81,7926 100 170,000 %retie 20 000 100,000 50 000 Grants In -Hand 17160,53 3 1,160 533 Mitigation In -Hand 457,600 373,600 38,900 45,100 L.I.D.'s Formed 392 947 767,586 10,000 35,100 Other KC Metro & WSDOT 1 950 000 300,000 1,200,000 450,000 450,000 Grants Proposed 11040,000 1,040,000 Mitigation Proposed 640,000 400,000 L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed WSDOT 600.000 600,000 Undetermined 2 629,467 2,629,467 400,000 200 000 TOTAL SOURCES 8 095 492 755,392 1 245 000 6,095,100 SR169 HOV 1,697,053 932,4141 10 000 55100 3,680,000, 2,350,000 4 FINAL 114 2:24PM d 0 (� November 24, 2004 WSDOT Northwest Region Local Programs Ed Conyers, P.E., Local Programs Engineer P.O. Box 330310, M/S 121 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Subject: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) HOV and Queue Jump Lanes Attention: Phil Segami, Assistant Local Programs Engineer Dear Mr. Conyers: The City of Renton is requesting obligation authority for $392,947 of STP(U) funds for Phase 1 construction. Two original signed Local Agency Agreements are enclosed for signature, along with the Federal Aid Project Prospectus. The City is continuing to move forward with this regionally beneficial project despite declining revenues. We have evaluated the project and identified three construction phases that have independent utility (description attached). Design engineering for Phases 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Phases 1 and 2 have environmental approval. The City has submitted an application to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) for a routine amendment to the Regional TIP, changing the project description to include project phasing. We understand that WSDOT's approval must follow this action in November for inclusion in the STIP. The City confirms their commitment to finishing all phases of this project. We recognize the transportation benefits for both people and freight along this corridor. Approximately $861,000 has been spent to -date on the design, including $300,000 of WSDOT funds and $561,000 of City funds. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 425.430.7232. Sincerely, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION Sharon Griffin, Program Development Coordinator Enclosures cc: Gregg Zimmerman Sandra Meyer Nick Afzali Leslie Lahndt Rob Lochmiller File Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) and Queue Jump Lanes Project Phases Attachment The phased project elements are as follows: • Phase 1— At I-405 ramps Expected to go to construction in early 2005. Install a new signal and relocate the Cedar River Park entrance away from the I-405 ramps (approximately 670 feet), eliminating a left -turn. Construct mitigating measures for Phases 1 and 2. • Phase 2 — At I-405 ramps Construct an eastbound drop right -turn and acceleration lane, a westbound right - turn lane and queue jump lane (1,500 lineal feet), and traffic islands; modify and interconnect signals, provide transit signal priority system, and widen sidewalks. • Phase 3 — At 140th Way SE Construct an eastbound right -turn lane and westbound HOV lane. WsgriffinTroject File1SR 169 Fed Aid Agreement 10-04 Appendix 21.41 Prospectus Submittal Checklist Local Agency: City of Renton Project Identification: Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) Use this sheet as a cover sheet to the project prospectus package. Place an "X" in the right column to denote items included. If not applicable, state N/A. Include in the cover letter a comment explaining the action taken on each item as appropriate. Note later with an "L" if the information will be supplied at a future date. Application: 1. Project Prospectus (Chapter 21.1)............................................................................... X 2. Vicinity Map................................................................................................................................................................................................................ X 3. Typical Roadway Section X 4. Typical Bridge Section NA 5. Local Agency Agreement (Chapter 22) X 6. TIP/STIP Inclusion (MPO/County/Agency, selected/limited to $) X Supporting Data: 7. Safety Checklist -A Supplement to the Project Prospectus for 2-R and 3-R Projects (Appendix 41.71) NA g. Photos (Railroad Crossing, ER Event Sites, as required) NA 9. Deviation Request and Deviation Analysis Form to Justify Request (reference Appendix 41.72) NA 10. Environmental Considerations (Chapter 24) X a. Class II Categorically Excluded (CE) - Environmental Classification Summary (ECS) X b. Class III Environmental Assessment (EA) NA c. Class I Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) NA d. SEPA Checklist X e. NEPA/SEPA/Section 404 Interagency Working Agreement NA f. Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) Determination of Effect Concurrence NA 11. Hearing Notices (Chapter 43) NA a. Transcript of Hearing NA 12. Location and Design Approval (Chapter 43) X 13. Right -of -Way Requirements (Chapter 25) a. Relocation Plan NA b. Right -of -Way Plans X c. Right -of -Way Project Funding Estimate or True Cost Estimate NA d. Request Right -of -Way Fund Authorization NA 14. Right -of -Way Certification (Chapter 25) X 15. Agreements/Easements with Railroads, Utilities, and Other Agencies (Chapter 32) L 16. FAA Notification (FAA Form 7460-1) (Chapter 24) NA 17. Tied Bids (Chapter 44) NA Remarks: A Washington State vI/ Department of Transportation Prefix Route Federal Aid Project Number Local Agency Project Number Local Agency Federal Aid Project Prospectus [Date 11 /3/2004 WSDOT Federal Employer 91-6001271 Use Only Tax ID Number Agency Federal Program Title City of Renton ® 20.205 ❑ 20.209 ❑ Other Project Title Start Latitude N 47.4678 Start Longitude W 122.2180 Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) HOV Lanes/Queue Jump End Latitude N 47.4797 End Longitude W 122.2171 Improvements Project Termini From To At 1-405 Ramps At 140th Way SE From: To: Length of Project 0.65 miles Award Type ® Local ElLocal Forces ElState ElRailroad Federal Agency City Number County Number County Name 1 I WSDOT Region ® FHWA ❑ Others 1 1070 17 King 1 Congressional District Legislative Districts Urban Area Number TMA / MPO / RTPO 8& 9 1 I& 41 1 PSRC Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start, Date Phase Estimated Cost Nearest Hundred Dollar) Funding (Nearest Hundred Dollar) (Nearest Hundred Dollar) Month. Year P.E. $886,492 $886,492 Complete RNV $529,000 $529,000 Complete Const. $6,680,000 $6,287,053 $392,947 Total $8,095,492 $7,702,545 $392,947 Description Of EAsting Facility (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width Number of Lanes 67 feet 5 The existing high level of traffic accidents and congestion on the Maple Valley Highway corridor have prompted the City and WSDOT to team together in order to provide cost effective improvements that will enhance traffic safety through roadway geometric and signalization improvements. The Maple Valley Highway is a critical regional freight, transit, HOV and commuter traffic corridor that runs east -west connecting Renton at 1-405 to the City of Maple Valley and SR-18. This area of SR 169 has an existing level of service "F". It has a state Truck Route Classification of T-1 carrying 10 million tons annually. Descrlp'twn of Proposei 1Nork . Roadway Width Number of Lanes ® New Construction ❑ 3-R ❑ 2-R 78 feet 7 Phase l : Install new signal; relocate Park entrance away from I-465 ramps (approx. 670 feet); construct mitigating measures. Phase 2: Construct an eastbound drop right -turn and acceleration lane (approx. 1,000 feet), a westbound right -turn and queue jump lane (approx. 1,500 feet), and traffic islands; modify and interconnect signals; provide transit priority; widen sidewalks. Phase 3: At 140th Way SE - Construct an eastbound right -turn lane and westbound HOV lanes. The proposed improvements at the SR 169/1-405 northbound ramp intersection will reduce queuing on the approach and provide HOV's with access to a new queue jump lane. The new merge lane will be constructed for the 1-405 northbound off -ramp connection to eastbound SR 169 to improve safe and mobility. Local Agency Contact Person Title Phone Sharon Griffin Program Development Coordinator 425.430.7232 Mailing Address City State Zip Code 1055 South Grady Way - 5th Floor Renton WA 98055 By Design Approval Ap roving Professional Engineer n Su Title Transportatronesigpervisor Date DOT Form 140-101 EF Page 1 of 3 ■ Supersedes Previous Editions■ Revised 12/2002 Agency Project Title Date City of Renton Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) HOV Lanes/Queue 11/3/2004 Geometric Design Data Description Through Route Crossroad Federal Functional Classification ®Urban — ❑ Rural ® Principal Arterial El Minor Arterial El Collector ❑ Major Collector ❑ Minor Collector ❑ Access Street/Road El Urban ❑ Rural i ❑ Principal Arterial El Minor Arterial ❑ Collector ❑Major Collector ❑ Minor Collector ❑ Access Street/Road Terrain ® Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain ❑ Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain Posted Speed 40 mph _ The crossroad is the on and off ramps of 1-405. Design Speed _ 40 mph _ Existing ADT 41,450 Design Year ADT Design Year Design Hourly Volume (DHV) Accident - 3 Year Experience Year Property Damage Accidents _-.Injwy Accidents Fatal Accidents Total Number of Accidents Number of Accidents Number of Injuries Number of Accidents Number of Fatalities 2000, 2001, 2002 115 _ - 86 117 1 1 _ 202 i Performance of Work Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By Others Agency Complete % % Construction Will Be Performed By Contract Agency Contractor/Utility Company 97 % 3 % Environmental Classification ® Final ❑ Preliminary ❑ Class I - Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ❑ Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Interagency Agreement ❑ Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA) ❑ Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Interagency Agreement ® Class II - Categorically Excluded (CE) ® Projects Requiring Documentation (Documented CE) Environmental Considerations The stormwater facilities are designed to capture and treat runoff, and to mitigate for increased flows from runoff. The facilities for detention and treatment are designed for "enhanced treatment" as defined by the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. Implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan using Best Management Practices during construction, will reduce flows and capture pollutants and sediment laden runoff prior to discharge to local surface waters DOT Form 140-101 EF Page 2 of 3 Revised 12/2002 Agency Project Title Date City of Renton Maple Valley Hwy (SR 169) HOV Lanes/Queue 1 l /3/2004 Right of Way ❑ No Right of Way Required ® Right of Way Required ' All construction required by the ®No Relocation El Relocation Required contract can be accomplished within the existing right of way. Description of Utility Relocation or Adjustments and Existing Major Structures Involved in the Project Various franchise utility facilities located within the existing right-of-way will need to be adjusted to the new roadway grade or relocated within the widened right-of-way. Existing utilities in the Stoneway property and the Par maintenance will be relocated due to the new access road. Three buildings may need to be demolished as part of the project. These include a maintenance building at the City's park maintenance facility and two equipment buildings at the Stoneway site. These buildings would be demolished even without the project because of relocation of the park maintenance facility and the redevelopment of the Stoneway site. None of the buildings are used for residential purposes. FAA Involvement Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks This project is within 1 mile of the Renton Municipal Airport. The project will not have an impact on the airport and does not require notice per the FAA Form 7460-1, Section 77.15, Construction or alteration not requiring notice. The project is located in a congested area of town where it is evident that the project "will not adversely affect safety in air navigation." This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's designee, and is not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for community development. Date Agency City of Renton By Mayor/Chairperson DOT Form 140-101 EF Revised 12/2002 Page 3 of 3 King County Countywide TEA-21 Projects 2002 Project Selection Process Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) HOV Lanes and Queue Jump Improvements Due date: Wednesday, June 5, 2002 12:00 Noon This electronic application information for Countywide TEA-21 funds includes: • Confirmation of Ratings for Submittals to Targeted Levels • Application • Vicinity Map Application submitted to Peter Heffernan via email (peter.heffernan@metrokc.gov) Attachments will be mailed upon request to: King County Transportation Planning Division 201 South Jackson Street Mail Stop KSC-TR-0814 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attn: Peter Heffernan countywidecallforprojects Iv-1 07/31 /02 5. Confirmation of Ratings for Submittals to Targeted Levels In order to receive funding, all projects must meet the "Support for Centers and Connecting Corridors" policy focus. This focus area is broadened beyond the designated urban centers defined for the regional — project competition to include centers identified in local plans, and/or connecting corridors. Project Sponsors must complete the attached application and provide the following information (check all that apply) for each project as appropriate as an attachment to the application. Criteria for Centers _ Support the potential for increased housing/employment densities in the center Support the development/redevelopment plans and activities of the center _Further the objectives and aims of existing policies for the center _Remedy a current or anticipated problem (congestion, incomplete sidewalk system, inadequate transit service/facilities, etc.) _Benefits a variety of user groups _Improves safe and convenient access to major destinations within the center _Improves circulation within the center for walkability, public transit access, public transit speed and reliability, safety and security, bicycle mobility, bicycle facilities, streetscape improvements, traffic calming) _Provides a range of travel modes or provides a "missing" mode _Completes a physical gap or provides an essential link in the transportation network Is compatible with a pedestrian oriented environment Improves safety and reduces modal conflicts Criteria for Connecting Corridors X Supports/benefits the development of a center X Improves access to employment and housing X Provides users traveling to centers with a range of travel modes, or will provide a missing mode X Benefits a variety of user groups X Improves safety and reduces modal conflicts X Provides a logical segment that links to a center X Fills in a missing link or removes barriers to a center X Supports a long-term strategy to maximize the efficiency of the corridor X Relieves pressure or removes a bottleneck X Positively impacts overall system performance *Reference documentation of "center" used for project *Status of public notice/involvement , An open house was held at the Renton City Hall on January 15'' 2002. The design draft report has been published. Traffic impact analysis has been completed. Channelization plans have been completed and pending WSDOT approval. Environmental documentation is in progress. countywi decallforproj ects IV-2 07/31 /02 V. Application Form King County Countywide Funds All project applications for countywide funding must be submitted to the King County Project Evaluation Committee by noon Wednesday, June 5, 2002. Projects to be submitted by the July 28, 2002, deadline to the Regional Council must be include completion of the full application as required by the Regional Council. King County Project Evaluation 2002 Countywide Project Application X Check here if submitting Countywide project For project sponsors that are requesting funding at or below the 70% level answer questions 1 through 10 and submit a completed that the project meets the criteria of "Centers". For project sponsors that are requesting funding for projects above the 70% level answer questions on pages 1 through 3 and pages 4 through 9. Please be as brief as possible and limit your application to a total of twelve (12) pages plus map and an supporting documents requested, including a Confirmation of Ratings Form. Check here if submitting Enhancement project For Enhancement projects, please complete the entire application form and attach responses to the item in the Required Information for Enhancement Projects section identified in Section 6. countywidecallforproj ects V-1 07/31 /02 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONO. Project Title: Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) HOV Lanes and Queue Jump Improvements 1 (For roadway project titles: list facility name, limits and any other identifying words; e.g., SR-520 HOV (104' Ave NE to 124' Ave NE) 2 Sponsoring Agency: City of Renton Also identify any co-sponsor(s): Strong support from WSDOT. 3 Project Contact Person: Nick Afzali Address: 1055 South Grady Way Phone: 425-430-7245 Fax: 425-430-7376 E-Mail: nafzali@ci.renton.wa.us 4 Project Description: (Be as clear and concise as possible) The City of Renton and WSDOT desire to improve the mobility and safety for both HOV's and general purpose traffic along Maple Valley Highway. The proposed imprvements will add a westbound HOV queue jump lane at the SR 169/ I-405 northbound ramp intersection. In addition, a new westbound HOV queue jump right -lane will reduce queuing on the approach and provide HOV's with access into a new queue jump lane. A new merge lane will be constructed for the 1-405 notrthbound off -ramp connection to eastbound SR 169 to improve safety and mobility. 5 Project Location: Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) HOV Lanes and Queue Jump Improvements Answer the following questions if applicable: b. Crossroad/landmark nearest to beginning of project: Interstate 405 (Identify landmark if no crossroad) c. Crossroad/landmark nearest to end of project: 1401h Way SE (Identify landmark if no crossroad) 6 Map: Include an 8'h" x 11" legible vicinity map (if applicable) with completed application form. If unable to send map electronically, provide separately by fax or mail. countywidecallforprojects V-2 07/31/02 7 1 Federal Functional Classification Code (Select only one) Assistance in determining the functional classification of a project is available by calling Stephanie Rossi at (206) 587-5118. Rural Functional Classifications ("under 5,000 population") (Outside the federal -aid urbanized and federal -aid urban areas) ❑ 00 Exception ❑ 01 Principal Arterial - Interstate ❑ 02 Principal Arterial ❑ 06 Minor Arterial ❑ 07 Major Collector ❑ 08 Minor Collector ❑ 09 Local Access ❑ 21 Proposed Principal Arterial — Interstate ❑ 22 Proposed Principal Arterial ❑ 26 Proposed Minor Arterial ❑ 27 Proposed Major Collector ❑ 28 Proposed Minor Collector ❑ 29 Proposed Local Access Urban Functional Classifications ("over 5,000 population") (Inside the federal -aid urbanized and federal -aid urban areas) ❑ 00 Exception ❑ 11 Principal Arterial —Interstate ❑ 12 Principal Arterial — Expressway ® 14 Principal Arterial ❑ 16 Minor Arterial ❑ 17 Collector ❑ 19 Local Access ❑ 31 Proposed Principal Arterial — Interstate ❑ 32 Proposed Principal Arterial — Expressway ❑ 34 Proposed Principal Arterial ❑ 36 Proposed Minor Arterial ❑ 37 Proposed Collector ❑ 39 Proposed Local Access NOTE: Federally Funded Projects. A roadway must be approved on the federally classified roadway system before projects on it may use federal transportation funds (this includes proposed new facilities). Projects which are on a roadway with a functional classification of 09, 19, 29 or 39 are not eligible to use federal transportation funds unless they are one of the exceptions listed below. If your project is an exception, identify its functional class code as TO Examples of Exceptions: • Any bicycle and/or pedestrian project. • Projects not on a roadway and using CMAQ or other funds • Any transit project, including equipment purchase and park -and -ride lot projects. 8 Which TEA-21 Funding Source are you requesting? ® STP ❑ CMAQ Amount requested: $ 37 23 If CMAQ, describe the eligible category which best fits your project: [Refer to Eligibility Information for STP and CMAQ'? countywidecallforproj ects V-3 07/3 I /02 FINANCIAL•' • 9 Financial Information Matrix (NOTE. A minimum of 13.5% match is required) [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [Il Phase Estimated Federal Federal Match Match Other Other Phase Total Obligation Funding Funds Funding Funds Funds Funds Date by Source Amount Source Amount Source Amount Phase STP/CMAQ Design 10/01/03 $ $ $ $ R/W 02/01/04 STP $ Constr. 08/01/04 STP 392,947 Renton $61,327 WSDOT $450,000 904,274 $392,947 $904,274 TOTALS ------ $61,327 ------ $450,000 To calculate the amount of matching funds: Divide the amount of federal funds requested by .865; subtract the amount of federal funds requested from this amount. Example: Federal funds requested = $100,000 $100,000 ! .865 = $115,607 $115,607 - $100,000 = $15,607 local match required (Total project cost = $115,607; 13.5% = $15,607) 10 Estimated total cost of this project (all phases): $ 6,502,000 Estimated date of completion (MM/DD/YY): 12/12/04 countywidecallforprojects V-5 07/31/02 IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: Projects will be evaluated and scored based on the information provided in Parts I and 2 that follow. Refer to "Countywide Project Evaluation Criteria" for information on the Countywide Project Evaluation Criteria. • Part 1: Choose one of the two project categories that best fits your proposed project and complete Section A or B • Part 2: Complete all Sections D through F 11 I Choose which of the two Centers categories your project falls under: [] Designated Urban Center AA NOTE. Complete Section A, then proceed to Sections C through F in Part 2 ® Connecting Corridors AA NOTE: Complete Section 8, then proceed to Sections C through F in Part 2 countywidecallforproj ects V-6 07/31 /02 SECTION A: DESIGNATED URBAN CENTERS Complete this section if your project is a "Designated Urban Centers" project, then proceed to Part 2. Please explain how your project addresses the following: • How will the project help the Urban Center to develop in a manner consistent with adopted policies or comprehensive plans? Describe how the project will support increased activity in the Urban Center, implement any development plans for the center, and enhance the Center's sense of place. Please provide a citation and copy of the appropriate pages(s) from the plan or policies. • Describe the impact the project will have on the Urban Center. Will the project remedy an existing or anticipated problem (e.g., congestion, incomplete sidewalk system, inadequate transit service or facilities, etc.), or benefit a large number or wide variety of users? • Will the project provide access to a major destination or significantly improve circulation within the Urban Center? For projects with a parking component, describe how it will be compatible with a pedestrian -oriented environment. N/A SECTION B: CONNECTING CORRIDORS Complete this section if your project is a "Connecting Corridors" project, then proceed to Part 2. countywidecallforproj ects V-7 07/31 /02 Please explain how your project addresses the following: • Describe how the investment in the corridor improves access or directly benefits a center(s) by providing a range of travel modes and by serving multiple user groups. • Describe how the project improves a corridor in logical segments, thereby preventing the creating of missing links or gaps. • Describe how the project creates more effective and efficient travel flows along the corridor by filling missing links or removing barriers. • Describe how the improvements create long-term sustainable solutions and improve the system as a whole. In order to respond to the above questions, it is important to present brief descriptions of the current traffic operations, location within the transportation network, as well as proposed improvements that would reduce the level of congestion significantly. The Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) is a critical regional freight, transit, HOV and commuter traffic corridor that runs east -west connecting Renton at 1-405 to Maple Valley and SR 18. The highway is included in the King County Regional Arterial Network and designated as a regionally significant T1 freight route by the State. However, the Maple Valley Highway exhibits extreme congestion and travel time delays for all modes of travel. This congestion often leads to complete failure conditions on the corridor, i.e. LOS F. The highway has a five -lane cross-section for most of its length; it narrows to four lanes as it bends around the Cedar River between approximately SE 5th Street and 131" Avenue SE. The existing right-of-way varies in width from 105-feet to 185-feet. The 2001 average daily traffic (ADT) is 41,450 vehicles. PM peak period traffic volumes show a 60:40 split with dominant progression in the eastbound direction. This indicates that the corridor carries a significant number of commuters who reside east of Renton. Westbound traffic during the AM carries a significant number of vehicles that access the I-405 northbound ramps. The right -turn traffic at the ramp intersection is controlled by a signal, and traffic can regularly back up to the east for at least one half a mile. During PM peak hours, the queue for the eastbound SR 169 right - turn movement from the I-405 ramp can sometimes back up all the way to the northbound travel lanes on I-405 causing acute safety and operational problems on the freeway. Occupancy data for the Maple Valley Highway show that during the PM peak period, 81 percent of traffic consists of single occupant vehicles (SOVs) and 19 percent of the east -west traffic consists of vehicles with two or more occupants. Three percent of the total traffic includes vehicles with three or more occupants. Two bus routes operate on the Maple Valley Highway. The combined service from these bus routes provides three buses per hour on the corridor during the PM peak period. A review of City and State accident records for the past 3-year period (1998-2000) identified 146 accidents at Maple Valley Highway and the I-405 northbound and eastbound SR 169 ramps, including 80 PDO and 65 injury accidents. The existing high level of traffic congestion and accidents on the Maple Valley Highway corridor have prompted the City of Renton and WSDOT to team together in order to provide cost-effective improvements that will: • Enhance traffic safety through roadway geometrics and improved signalization. • Improve transportation of freight, employers, and workers to and from the Renton industrial areas and job centers. • Support the economy by reducing barriers to the movement of people and products. The improvements in the area of SR169 / I-405 will reduce traffic congestion and accidents. Specifically, the project will produce the following immediate benefits: • In the combined eastbound and westbound directions, transit vehicles are estimated to save approximately 900 person minutes per day on the Maple Valley Highway corridor. • The westbound right -turn lane and transit -only queue jump at the northbound 1-405 ramp intersection would provide savings to both general-purpose vehicles and HOVs totaling 8,800 person minutes per day. Total HOV savings for this treatment is estimated to be 990 person minutes per day. V-8 07/31 /02 The project would provide a 1,000-foot lane that will enable eastbound vehicle to merge safely onto Maple Valley Highway and reduce the queue from backing up onto I-405. The work planned includes the completion of ongoing design and the construction of the following major elements: Transit Signal Priority at the intersections of SR 169 and the I-405 northbound ramp. - Westbound right -turn lane to northbound 1-405 ramp and a westbound transit queue jump at the northbound I-405 ramp. The lane will be approximately 960 in length and 12-feet wide. The right -turn radius will be increased from 80 to 100-feet. Eastbound right -turn general purpose lane from the I-405 ramp to SR 169. The lane will be approximately 1,000 in length and 12-feet wide. The right -turn radius will be increased from 90 to 100-feet. Other improvements include curbs and gutters, sidewalks, pavement, channelization, and signal modifications. Signal improvements at Shari's Restaurant and Stoneway. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan adopted a multi -modal transportation Level of Service (LOS). This LOS represent different mode of travel including HOV, Transit and Non -motorized facility. Sidewalks, transit lanes, and queue jumps enables users to reach Renton downtown transit center without relying on traditional (SOV) mode of travel. Existing land use and downtown policies highly encourage mix -high density land developments. Number of these type of developments have been placed in downtown in the last few years. Multi -modal improvements would encourage these high density developments in downtown Renton. The Boeing, largest employer in Renton, its north site is located half a mile north east of this project. According to the recent CTR (Commuter Trip Reduction) This employment site has the highest level carpool in Renton. countywidecallforprojects V-9 07/31/02 Please explain how your project addresses the following: What other private and/or publicly funded project(s) will receive a benefit from this project? Describe the other project(s) and its relationship to your agency's project. Be specific. (E.g., If funds are committed to another project, describe the commitment, including the amount. Describe any conditions associated with the commitment, including timing. If the commitment or partnership is non -financial, so indicate.) In your answer, summarize relevant letters and/or documents describing commitments and key points. Include dates. Do not attach copies of these letters or documents. • Will an opportunity be lost if the project does not receive funds through this regional project competition? Describe and explain the consequences. Washington State Department of Transportation is contributing 5Mesig e cost of design. WSDOT is also committed to at least $450,000.00 for the costs associated with thehase. The proposed improvement s will improve the access to 1-405 , Cedar River Park, Renton transit center, and Major employers such as Boeing and PACCARD truck company on Park Avenue. Access points to Cedar River Park, Shari's restaurant and Stoneway will be improved significantly by placing additional traffic light. This new traffic light will be coordinated with the existing traffic lightsto reduce the delays and back-ups. Metro King County transit services Level of Service will be improved by using an exclusive bus lane at a major intersection. SECTION F: PLANNING Please explain how your project addresses the following: • Describe the planning process through which this project has been developed. • Describe how the project is consistent with a local jurisdiction's adopted comprehensive plan, local plan, transit plan, etc. IMPORTANT: Provide specific citations and a copy of the appropriate pages and include dates of adoption. • Describe how the project is consistent with Destination 2030 (adopted May 2001). Refer to the PSRC website (www.psrc.org) for a list of Destination 2030 policies. City of Renton's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (T.1.P.) The project has been on the City of Renton's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) since at least 1993. Q countywidecallforprojects V-10 07/31 /02 SECTION G: AIR QUALITY NOTE: While project sponsors are not requested to provide detailed quantitative analyses at this tir those projects that are selected for CMAQ funds will be asked to assist staff in quantifying the bene of their projects prior to TIP submittal. Describe how your project will reduce emissions. Include discussion of the population served by the project — who will benefit, where and over what time period. Be as specific as possible and include examples. Answers will vary depending on the type of project, for example: • Describe how your project will reduce VMT, either by eliminating or shortening vehicle trips; • Describe how your project will result in a mode shift from SOVs to transit, carpool or non -motorized; • Describe how your project will result in an increase in transit ridership, either through new transit service or greater accessibility to transit; • Describe how your project will improve the flow of traffic and reduce the amount of idling vehicles - how will this project relieve an existing problem; • Describe how your project will reduce emissions through alternative fuels or vehicles. 1. The proposed transit improvements would icrease the usage or transit services. 5. This project does not include alternative fuels or vehicles. countywidecallforproj ects V-11 07/31 /02 Ave S Grant %,Vl S Hills Ave _Y\1 NN`9Pf Main Ave S Q'. Cedar! Ave S Ave S� Renton Ave S W. i v e. S S V moo4a -0 Well Pelly[Ave.N Pell Pork t Ave N Parl Garden Ave N Factory oAve N Z: %0. Ead, M SE 0 -- T- 6! Index Pl. Monroe Ave NE it 3N'@A ti — — — — — — — — — Union Ave SE 134th Ave r-+ _1?36th Ave E ---- ----- 138th Ave ISE Du 140th Ave, 140th Ave SE 142nd Ave ISE 142 Ind i Ave SE Hoquio 1 43rd Ave SE j 143rd Ave SE 143rd pl. SE 144th Ave, SF 144th Ave SF Ilwoco Ave CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (x-7248) Daniel Carey (x-7293) Subject: Final Pay Estimate — CAG-04-096 SWP-27-2057, Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance Project Exhibits: Pay Estimate # 4 Final Notice of Completion AI#: R For Agenda of: November 22, 2004 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions..... Information......... X Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $435.20 Transfer/Amendment........ Amount Budgeted....... $46,250.88 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $50,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The contractor, Santana Trucking & Excavating, Inc., started construction on August 18, 2004, and all work was completed on October 6, 2004. The original contract amount was $46,250.88 and the final contract amount is $45,430.21. The difference of-$847.67 was due to minor changes in bid item quantities used. The approved 2004 total project budget was $50,000. The 2004 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program 421 account has sufficient budget remaining to fund the final pay estimate (line item 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065405). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Surface Water Utility of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that the Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance Project be accepted, the Final Pay Estimate be approved, and the retainage of $2,087.79 be released after sixty days and all required releases from the State have been obtained. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2057 Maplewood Sediment Basin\04- 2004 Pond Cleaning\1000-1 Final Pay\041109-Agen d aB i l l-F IN A L. d oc\D W Ctp TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACTOR: Santana Trucking & Excavating ( TRACT NO. CAG 04-096 ESTIMATE NO. 4 Final PROJECT: Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance Project 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $400.00 2. SALES TAX @ 8.60% $35.20 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $435.20 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $39,287.92 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $380.00 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $2,067.79 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $20.00 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $3,639.30 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $35.20 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX " (95% x LINE 1) *' (RETAINAGE: 5%) GRAND TOTAL: FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11).- ACCOUNT # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065405 RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8): ACCOUNT # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065405 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION $415.20 # 4 Final $20.00 # 4 Final TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST, DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON,,{{ AND THAT I AM 7 AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM / ? Signed: $39,667.92 $2,087.79 $3,674.50 $45,430.21 $415.20 $20.00 $435.20 DC-- //-1-6 `f /J it/ I by Printed On: 11/09/2004 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 Printed On: 11/09/2004 City of Renton Public Works Department Page 1 Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance Project: Project -tor Santana Trucking 8 Excavating ,,em Description No. 001. Mobilization 002. Construct Bypass Structures, Drain Basin 003. Remove, Haul, Dispose of Sediment 004. Refill Basin, Remove Bypass 005. Gravel Placement - Detail 1 006. Gravel Placement - Detail 2 007. Plant - Douglas Spiraea 008. Plant - SnowBerry 009. Plant - Vine Maple 010. Plant - Red Stem Dogwood 011. Plant - Native Willows 012. Hydroseed /. Minor Changes Subtotal 8.8 % Sales Tax TT Total Pay Estimate Unit Est. Quantity 4 Final Unit Price Lump Sum 1 $2.000.00 Lump Sum 1 $7,500.00 Lump Sum 1 $24,950.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,500.00 Ton 18 $40.00 Ton 18 $40.00 Each 15 $96.00 Each 15 $16,00 Each 15 $80.00 Each 20 $14.00 Each 20 $3.00 Acre 0.10 $9,000.00 Lump Sum 1 $1,000.00 Contract Number: Closing Date: Previous Previous Quantity Amount CAG 04-096 11/9/2004 This Quantity 0.800 $1,600,00 0.200 1.0 $7,500.00 1 $24,950.00 1 $1,500.00 25.32 $1,012.80 34.44 $1,377.60 13 $1,248.00 12 $192.00 7 $560.00 17 $238.00 16 $48.00 0.08 $720.00 0.40931 $409.31 $41, 355.71 $3,639.30 $44,995.01 This Total Total Amount Quantity Amount $400.00 1.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 1.00 $7,500.00 $0.00 1.00 $24,950.00 $0.00 1.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 25.32 $1,012.80 $0.00 34,44 $1,377.60 $0.00 13.00 $1,248.00 $0.00 12.00 $192.00 $0.00 7.00 $560.00 $0.00 17.00 $238.00 $0.00 16.00 $48.00 $0.00 0.08 $720.00 $0.00 0.41 $409.31 $400.00 $41,755.71 $3520 $3,674.50 $435.20 $45,430.21 47101 of Washington Department of Revenue n6TAI��State Audit Procedures & Administration PO Box 47474 Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 Reg.No.: Date: NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY �.. City of Renton Assigned To Tracy Schuld 1055 South Grady Way Date Assigned Renton, WA 98055 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract CAG-04-096 - Maplewood Creek Sediment Basin 2004 Maintenance Project Contractor's Name Santana Trucking & Excavating, Inc. Telephone No. 425-868-1111 Attn: Keggen Thompson Contractor's Address 23316 NE Redmond -Fall City Rd., #647 Redmond, WA 98053 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted August 18, 2004 October 6, 2004 November 22, 2004 Surety or Bonding Co. St. Paul Surety Agent's Address Seattle Branch Office, 6100 219th ST SW, STE. 300, P.O. Box 248 Montlake Terrace, WA 98043 Phone: 425-744-5200 Contract Amount: Additions or Reductions: Sales Tax: Total $46,250.88 -$847.67 $3,674.50 $45,430.21 Utz Phone No: Amount Disbursed: $43,342.42 Amount Retained: $2,087.79 Total: $45,430.21 (Disbursing Officer) The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92) DC:CTY31 0020 11/99 bh CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Rebecca Lind Subject: R-1 Zone Community Separators Exhibits: Issue paper Draft Code language Background Paper presented by J. Rollins For Agenda of: Nov. 22, 2004 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance.. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Set a public hearing for December 2004 Legal Dept......... 13 Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. X SUMMARY OF ACTION: This item was referred to the Planning and Development Committee on January 26, 2004 in response to a citizen request for an amendment to the Renton Municipal Code. The request is for regulations consistent with King County clustering requirements within the designated Urban Separators. Current County code requires clustering and set aside of 50% of the site area in a dedicated open space tract. The Planning and Development Committee prioritized the item ahead of the annual docket amendments due to concurrent annexation activity within the Urban Separator and requested staff to prepare a work program and analysis of the clustering issues. A draft code amendment is ready for Planning Commission review and public hearing. The item will be held in the Planning and Development Committee for recommendation pending completion of the public review process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Enact a mandatory cluster provision within the designated urban separators. Require 30% open space rather than the proposed mandatory 50% open space requirement. CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: j- j Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor y'V FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Ac-C Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (x6588) SUBJECT: R-1 Zone Community Separators ISSUE: Should the City enact a mandatory cluster standard identical to the current King County code requiring a 50% open space tract? RECOMMENDATION: • Enact a mandatory clustering provision. • Use the cluster standard recently adopted in the R-4 Zone for clustered lot development rather than the 50% open space requirement in King County Code. This standard requires dedication of 30% of the site as contiguous open space. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Potential Annexation Area and Urban Separator resident, Jean Rollins, requested a Code amendment -addressing clustering and open space requirements in the R-1 zone. The Planning and Development Committee approved this work program as an exception to the Title IV amendment process pursuant to Section 4-9-025C and agreed to review the request outside the annual code amendment docket due to current annexation activity. The work program intent is to evaluate opportunities to increase consistency between King County policies and zoning and Renton's requirements. November 12, 2004 Page 2 The Countywide Planning Polices (CPP) call for designation and preservation of urban separators that protect environmentally sensitive areas and creation of open space corridors between communities. Specifically CPP LU-27 states: Urban Separators are low -density areas or areas of little development within the Urban Growth Area. Urban separators shall be defined as permanent low -density lands, which protect adjacent resource, lands, rural Areas, and environmentally sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. Designated urban separators shall not be re -designated in the future (in the 20 year planning cycle) to other urban uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban separators is a regional as well as a local concern. Therefore, no modifications should be made to the development regulations governing these areas without King County review and concurrence. Renton has three Urban Separators: May Valley, Cedar River, and the Talbot area by Springbrook Creek. These areas are designated and mapped in the Countywide Planning Policies as shown in Attachment 1. Urban Separators are currently implemented in King County regulations through a mandatory clustering standard requiring clustering away from sensitive areas or the axis of the Community Separators. Permanent retention of open space tracts that include at least 50% of the site is also sought. King County has had these requirements since 1983. King County required clustering and 50% open space retention in its "SC-P" zone. "SC" denoted Suburban Cluster and "P" denoted open space requirements. In the County's "R-1-P" zoning code, enacted in 1994, clustering and 50% open space retention was required. Renton's Comprehensive Plan addresses Urban Separators in the Community Design Element Policies and in the Land Use Element Policies and map within the Residential Low Density Designation. Community Desi,-n Element Objective CD-B: Designate low -density residential and resource areas as Urban Separators to provide physical and visual distinctions between Renton and adjacent communities, and to define Renton's boundaries. Policy CD-7. The function of Urban Separators should be to: a. reinforce the character of the City, b. establish clear boundaries between the City and other communities, c. Separate high -density urban land uses from low -density uses and resource lands, and d. Protect environmentally sensitive or critical areas. Policy CD-8. Locational criteria should consider the following types of lands for designation as Urban Separators: Issue paper.doc November 12, 2004 Page 3 a. Individual and interconnecting natural features, critical areas, public and private open space and water features. b. Existing and proposed individual and interconnecting parks, and agricultural areas. c. Areas that provide a logical and easily identifiable physical separation between urban communities. Land Use Element RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: Policies in this section are intended to guide development on land appropriate for a range of low intensity residential and employment where land is either constrained by sensitive areas or where the City has the opportunity to add larger -lot housing stock, at urban densities of 4-du/net acre, to its inventory. Lands that are not appropriate for urban levels of development are designated either Resource Conservation or Residential Low Density Zoning. Lands that either do not have significant sensitive areas, or can be adequately protected by the critical areas ordinance, are zoned Residential 4. Objective LU-DD: Provide for a range of lifestyles and appropriate uses adjacent to and compatible with urban development in areas of the City and Potential Annexation Area constrained by extensive natural features, providing urban separators and/or providing a transition to Rural Designations within King County. Policy LU-134. Base development densities should range from one home per 10 acres (Resource Conservation) to one home per acre (Residential 1) on Residential Low Density (RLD) designated land with significant environmental constraints, including but not limited to: steep slopes, erosion hazard, floodplains, and wetlands or where the area is in a designated Urban Separator. Density should be a maximum of 4-du/net acre (Residential 4) on portions of the Residential Low Density land where these constraints are not extensive and urban densities are appropriate. Comparison of Renton and County Zonin,- Implementation The major difference between Renton and the County regarding R-1 development patterns occurs in the application of clustering provisions and in density calculation. Renton allows and encourages clustering but does not mandate it. However, the City calculates density based on net developable area and excludes all critical areas and all private and public road easements. Critical areas are defined as "Areas of the City that may not be suitable for development and which are subject to the City's critical areas regulations including very high landslide hazard areas, protected slopes, wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat, shorelines or floodways." Density credit is only granted for required critical areas buffers. Issue papendoc 'November 12, 2004 Page 4 Typically there is about a 20% reduction in the density allowed on a site under Renton's net density regulations compared with County regulations. There is an incentive for clustering to reduce the land area used by roads. Whenever extensive critical areas are present on a site there is de -facto clustering of development away from these undevelopable areas. Clustering is allowed down to a 4,500 sq. ft lot size in the R-1 zone in a development pattern allowing up to 6 lots. A 50-ft. lot width, 65-ft. lot depth, 5-ft, side yard, and 20-ft. rear yard setback are required. The City typically uses conservation easements, protective easements, or tract and deed restrictions to protect a critical area from development with non-exempt activities. The County grants density credit for the entire site gross area and transfers the development potential to 50% of the site with the remaining 50% in a permanent open space tract. Development could be clustered on small lot areas, as there is a 2,500-sq. ft. minimum lot size, 30-ft. lot width, and 5-ft. setbacks on all sides required. This form of development could result in clusters of higher net density than allowed under the Renton code. However, the effective difference between City and County zoning varies considerably depending upon the extent of critical areas and roads on a site. (The density allowed in the City will always be less based on the net density calculation.) The net developable areas available to use that density will vary. For example: If a site is at least 50% constrained by critical areas, and requires any new road development, the Renton net developable area will be less than the County developable area even with the mandatory clustering in County code. The critical areas set aside will be the equivalent of the County's mandatory cluster requirement. If a site is marginally constrained by sensitive areas, the allowed density will still be less in the City due to the roads. Adoption of a mandatory cluster using the County standard would result in a developable area discounted by the 50% open space provision minus the road areas. Without required clustering and open space retention the development within these areas could lead to "horse -acre" type platting. "Horse - acre" platting is characterized by low density, semi -rural development. Although a desirable development type for upper -income families, it is considered inefficient because the infrastructure serves fewer people and public transit may not be feasible. Modifying Renton's zoning code to be more similar to the County's would change the way the development would be laid out for parcels with less than 50% critical areas constraints. In the May Valley Urban Separator, there are 12 parcels out of 36 that are both large enough to subdivide and also have less than 50% critical areas. The properties shown on attachment 2 would be affected by the proposed change in standards. Properties along the Cedar River in the Urban Separator designation would likely be zoned Resource Conservation rather than R-1 as this larger lot zone is applied within this corridor. Within the Talbot Road Urban Separator there are significant sensitive areas on most parcels as shown on Attachment 3. A more detailed analysis of this area will be completed prior to the Planning Commission and Planning and Development Committee discussions of this proposed amendment. Issue paper.doc 'November 12, 2004 Page 5 CONCLUSION: As a result of the difference in City and County density systems and the way critical areas are considered in the net developable area, staff recommends that the 50% open space requirement be reduced to 30%. This adjustment addresses the difference in net developable area between the two density systems. For some developable parcels in urban separators, imposition of the County standard would further reduce the net developable area. The majority of properties in the Urban Separators have significant enough critical areas constraints to trigger clusters. For the remaining parcels, the reduction in net developable area required for road improvements will further reduce density below County allowances. To require the full additional 50% open space set aside combined with the City's larger lot size and setback requirements would further constrain capacity on these sites. The adoption of a new 30% open space standard will provide comparable levels of protection for the Urban Separators given the density differences in the two zoning codes. The purpose of the R-1 zone and of the Urban Separators policies in the Countywide Planning Policies is to protect these lands by limiting development potential and recognizing separators of significant value. The Renton net density and critical areas ordinance requirements already accomplish this purpose to a large degree. Adding the additional requirement for a minimum 30% open space dedication will further these goals. cc: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Issue paper.doc 'November 12, 2004 Page 6 Applicable Metropolitan King County Code: 0 Title 21A. 12.030 1 7a. `All subdivisions and short subdivisions in the R-1 zone shall be required to be clustered if the property is located within or contains: (1) a floodplain, (2) a critical aquifer recharge area, (3) a Regionally of Locally Significant Resource Area, (4) existing or planned pubic parks or trails, or connection to such facilities, (5) a Class I or II stream or wetland, or (6) a steep slope, or (7) a "greenbelt/urban separator" or "wildlife corridor" area designated by the Comprehensive Plan or Community Plan. 0 17b. The development shall be clustered away from sensitive areas or the axis of designated corridors such as urban separators or the wildlife habitat network to the extent possible and the open space shall be placed in a separate tract that includes at least fifty percent of the site. Open space tracts shall be permanent and shall be dedicated to a homeowner's association or other suitable organization, as determined by the director, and meet the requirements of K. C. C. 21A.14.040. On site sensitive area and buffers, wildlife habitat networks, required habitat and buffers for protected species and designated urban separators shall be placed within the open space tract to the extent possible. Passive recreation (with no development of recreational facilities) and natural -surface pedestrian and equestrian trails are acceptable uses within the open space tract. " 0 Title 21A.14.040 C. In the R-1 zone, open space tracts created by clustering required by K.C.C. 21A 12.030 shall be located and configured to create urban separators and greenbelts required by the Comprehensive Plan, or subarea plans or open space functional plans to connect and protect wildlife habitat corridors designated by the Comprehensive Plan and to connect existing or planned public parks or trails. King County may require open space tracts created under this subsection to be dedicated to an appropriate managing public agency or qualifying private entity such as a nature conservancy. In the absence of such a requirement, open space tracts shall be retained in undivided interest by the residents of the subdivision or short subdivision. A homeowner's association shall be established for maintenance of the open space tract. " Issue paper.doc 175thcli co co c (� N LLI c2 ct x U) W >e� (i) 169th Ave SE 168th Ave SE - 11 164th Ave .SE 4t a T s Js a 156th Ave SE N} - - J s 4 Akg LO 148th e SE w w d 144th Ave SE N a 0' 0 0 138th Ave SE 140th Ave SE 'T•! - - ---- _ 'ram W: co Union Ave NE ' a, Q Qa.% 1'28th Ave SE Monroe Ave NE Z r r c� w E Q. cm Edmonds Ave NE z r U), a> Edmonds Ave NE cP .z > p 116th Ave SE 116th.Ave SE eta! E 00 U b aA w 108hcn AyveS1= r. z o ,al C3 . O b O Rico ®� o a�i T N Ay 6 �L� fa Rd S O r 3 a Taib � y M • . a r inter Ave N O E.Yalley Rd.}W May Creek Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size (ac.) Sensitive Areas (%) Current KC Zoning Develop. Potential* Assessed Value Public Ownership 342405 9106 1.13 90% R-1 Low 34,000 9113 0.04 90% R-1 Low 65,000 9110 0.55 90% R-1 Low 190,000 9109 0.56 90% R-1 Low 154,000 9026 0.58 90% R-1 Low 180,000 9108 0.56 90% R-1 Low 153,000 9016 0.83 90% R-1 Low 148,000 9072 0.75 70% R-1 Low 212,000 9099 3.90 50% R-1 Medium 203,000 9117 1.41 50% R-1 Medium 62,000 9116 1.03. 50% R-1 Medium 21,000 9058 0.98 70% R-1 Low 321,000 `4 . 032305 9116 0.74 0% R-1 Low 236,000 9112 1.72 0% R-1 Medium 259,000 9164 1.66 0% R-1 Medium 304,000 s327,OQQ: ;: t '. 9005293�009 �. 'fi✓ 4 '^{ ¢ ° S, �{ ', twyyT"' "" f.� { -. 4 Y &(r '. ? i A "A � -'aR i d. y> :. y 9071' .'Yz+., d +•Ft.. ,..a, i k'L, .., a- f f�c. 73syywi:m �`. .w-A.� .). ,. :# J!s aT.w.cer?s;' 342405 9047 6.11 1 50% R-1 Medium 387,000 9048 1.82 80% R-1 Low 382,000 9063 1.23 100% R-1 Low 80,000 9019 0.45 5% R-1 Low 217,000 9076 0.65 0% R-1 Low 176,000 9077 0.75 1 70% R-1 Low 42,000 9050 1.26 90% R-1 Low 263,000 9051 3.97 100% R-1 Low 180,000 032305 9069 5.82 15% R-1 Medium ..g 368,000 $..'�75n7,00Qfi s 3k �>.xA._ve.<vA�o.�� ,two::<�` i2r�o +.. .i..,r-3 o3.,�:. +krm .n,�t.�}�ttz ..,.iw «.�JM,w...dr..sk: �-✓. ..4ntxJr. .Y2,0oo ar.....,+,+gym.'. 1Z'Gi'{n51��•,,. b 9038 2.70 50%.n R-1 Medium 273,000 9111 1.62 0% R-1 Low 110,000 9102 1.0 0% R-1 Low 372,000 TZ*�s^ k6�6,Q0U.F " u" TOTALS Development Potential LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25% to 74% Less than 25% Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Size Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less than 3.0 acres 3.0 acres or larger A E (p / (7 (� r t J! t Cedar River Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size (ac.) Sensitive Areas (%) Current KC Zoning Develop. Potential* Current Assessed Value Public Ownership 222305 9134 0.89 100% UR Low 45,000 9105 0.47 100% UR Low 34,000 9104 0.47 100% UR Low 69,000 9155 1.65 100% UR Low 283,000 9139 1.32 100% UR Low 179,000 232305 9037 2.61 30% UR Low 308,000 9169 1.92* 0% UR Low 12,000 9135 0.78 0% UR Low 132,000 9180 1.24* 10% UR Low 134,000 9078 1.25* 0% UR Low 57,000 9007 2.83* 0% UR Low 109,000 9015 3.23 * 0% UR Low 80,400 9088 0.63 100% UR Low 218,000 9097 0.72 100% UR Low 55,000 9133 0.67 100% UR Low 209,000 9032 1.61 100% UR Low 44,000 9132 1.12 100% UR Low 152,000 9010 1.41 100% UR Low 242,000 9070 1.48 100% UR Low 145,000 9123 1.71 100% UR Low 263,000 9086 0.34 100% UR Low 84,000 9012** 1.31 100% UR Low 145,000 9127** 0.50 100% UR Low 137,000 9158** 0.22 100% UR Low 18,000 9108** 0.25 100% UR Low 33,000 9013 1.38 100% UR Low 292,000 9121 1.62 95% UR Low 179,000 9030 1.53 90% UR Low 172,000 9199** 1.17 100% UR Low 302,000 KC 9125** 0.92 100% UR Low 197,000 KC 9137 0.15 100% UR Low 152,000 9122 0.23 100% UR Low 144,000 9177 0.23 1 100% UR Low 138,000 9178 0.21 100% UR Low 177,000 9014 1.96 5% UR Low 235,000 TOTALS * Indicates only portions of indicated parcels. ** Indicates parcels under common ownership Development Potential LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25% to 74% Less than 25% Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Size Less than 5.0 acres More than 5.0 acres but less than 10.0 acres 10.0 acres or larger South 179 th Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Current Public (ac.) Areas (ac.) KC Potential* Assessed Ownership Zoning Value 991$ W, V J ,-3,223' �-4 9078** 1.85 60% R-1 Medium 234,000 7 -Pow 2 --�T 5,� '00, A-1 '601, 1112-M �1211!1,1112— TOTALS Indicates only portions of indicated parcels. Indicates parcels under common ownership Sprins!brook West Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size (ac.) Sensitive Areas, (ac.) Current KC Zoning Develop. Potential* Current Assessed Value Public Ownership 0622059098 0.92 0% R-1 Low 240,000 En -, :, "Ia. , , fig 23 9061 4.94 1 60% R-1 Medium 407,000 9051 1.73 R-1 Medium 290,000 9143 1.82 0610 R-1 Medium 238,000 9001 0.64 0% R-1 Low 134,000 NO %M ":120 0005 2.00 0% R-1 Medium 355,000 0010 2.06 .0% R-1 Medium 293,000 0025 0.38 0% R-1 Low 1,000 0021 0.51 0% R-1 Low 479,000 0022 0.51 0% R-1 Low 436,000 0023 0. 0% R-1 Low 473,000 0024 0.68 0% R;-1 Low 498,000 TOTALS Develonment Potential LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25% to 74% Less than 25% ssessed Value Ratio. Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Rz'e, Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less than 3.0 acres 3.0 acres or larger Sprinp_brook East Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size (ac.) Sensitive Areas (ac.) Current KC Zoning Develop. Potential* Current Assessed Value Public Ownership 3388320220 0.33 0% R-1 Low 234,000 0230 0.27 0% R-1 Low 230,000 0240 0.28 0% R-1 Low 211,000 7 7 6. 0 7�5'i 9077 9046 5.06 r5 3.56 0% 0% R-1 R-1 Medium Medium 1,519,000 251,900 9305 0.38 0% R-1 Low 192,000 9323 0.38 0% R-1 Low 270,000 9332 0.25 0% R-1 Low 198,000 9043 0.39 0% R-1 Low 378,000 9339 0.47 0% R-1 Low 274,000 9136 1.41 0% R-1 Medium .114,000 9137 0.93 0% R-1 Low 236,000 9240 2.03 0% R-1 Low 557,000 9331 1.23 0% R-1 Low 192,000 9243 0.47 0% R-1 Low 224,000 9234 0.34 1 0% R-1 Low 217,000 9269 3.46 0% R-1 Medium 226,300 9042 1.51 0% R-1 Low 276,000 9007 1.51 10% R-1 Low 278,000 TOTALS Dd-vP1anmPnt Pnti-ntial LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25% to 74% Less than 25% Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 kircel Size Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less than 3.0 acres 3.0 acres or larger y R-g R g R-g ATTACHMENT ` IH R F-< R-10 i R=1.0. z .. 1 IM } a u C A _ r 'R — 10 / IM CA # }: IT Co IL s - 4 _I Co F: FRM "R—8 — R 30 � �iCDCP> cb E I 0 Y. x I r-' CO(P) C13 e,. ,It r - RM-Ir.Nl Yam. ------------ �s 1 , Irig,. w S '+ .. , i#€ramco Al\� jI R-14 R-14 6" 1 1 J I 1 m -i F I i 4 a s y <' 1 a r C xx I gi. I - ,s, R-1 Cluster Code Amendment Draft November 3, 2004 4-2-110A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS /Drimary and Attached Accessory Structures) •RC -- - -R-1 - - - - - R-4 R-8 DENSITY Net Density in Dwelling Units per Net Acre Minimum None None None 4 dwelling units Housing Density per net acre1,2 for proposed short plats or subdivisions Maximum 1 dwelling unit 1 dwelling unit per 4 dwelling units g dwelling units Housing Density2 per 10 net 1 net acre per 1 net acre per 1 net acre acre 5 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER LOT Maximum 1 dwelling with 1 dwelling unit 1 dwelling unit 1 dwelling unit Number per legal 1 accessory Iot2 unit LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum Lot 10 acres 1 acre 8,000 sq. ft. 4,500 sq. ft. for Size for lots 4,500 sq. ft. for except where parcels greater created after cluster small lot than 1 acre. November 10, 2004 development3 clusters10 are allowed, R-8 5,000 sq. ft. for standards shall parcels 1 acre or apply. less. Minimum Lot 150 ft. for 75 ft. for interior 70 ft. for interior 50 ft. for interior Width for lots interior lots. lots. lots. 80 ft. for lots. created after 11, 13 corner lots. November 10, 175 ft. for 85 ft. for corner except where 60 ft. for corner 2004 corner lots. lots. small lot lots clusters 10 are allowed, R-8 standards shall apply. Minimum Lot 200 ft. 85 ft. 80 ft. except 65 ft. Depth for lots where s m all lot created after clusters are November 10, allowed, R-8 2004 standards shall apply. H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\E. 4-2-110 A.docLast printed 11/3/2004 3:25 PMPage 1 of 5 R-1 Cluster Code Amendment Draft November 3, 2004 RC R-1 R-4 R-8 SETBACKS Minimum Front 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. except 15 ft. for primary Yard where small lot structure. clusters10 are allowed, R-8 20 ft. for attached standards shall garages accessed apply. from front or side Unit with Alley yard street. Access Unit with Alley Garage: The Access Garage: front yard set- The front yard back of the set -back of the primary primary structure structure may may be reduced be reduced to to 10 ft. if all 20 ft. if all parking is parking is provided in the provided in the rear yard of the lot rear yard of the with access from lot with access a public right -of - from a public way or alley. 6 right-of-way or alley. 6 Minimum Side 30 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. except 15 ft. rfor the Yard Along a where small lot primary structure Street clusters10 are and 20 ft. for the allowed, 15 ft. is attached garages allowed. which access from the front and side yard along a street. Minimum Side 25 ft. 15 ft. 15 combined 5 ft. Yard ft. 12, 13 are allowed with a minimum of 5 ft. for any side yard, except where small lot clusters 10 are allowed, 5 ft. H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\E. 4-2-110 A.docLast printed 11/3/2004 3:25 PMPage 2 of 5 R-1 Cluster Code Amendment Draft November 3, 2004 RC R-1 R-4 R-8 SETBACKS Continued Minimum Rear 35 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. Yard Where small lot clusters 10 are allowed, 20 ft. Clear Vision Area In no case shall In no case shall In no case shall In no case shall a a structure over a structure over a structure over structure over 42 42 in. in height 42 in. in height 42 in. in height in. in height intrude into the intrude into the intrude into the intrude into the 20 ft. clear 20 ft. clear 20 ft. clear 20 ft. clear vision vision area vision area vision area area defined in defined in RMC defined in RMC defined in RMC RMC 4-11-030. 4-11-030. 4-11-030. 4-11-030. Minimum 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. landscaped Freeway landscaped landscaped landscaped setback from the Frontage Setback setback from the setback from the setback from the street property street property street property street property line. line. line. line. BUILDING STANDARDS Maximum 2 stories and 30 2 stories and 30 2 stories and 30 2 stories and 30 Building Height ft. ft. ft. for standard ft. and Number of roof. Stories, except for uses having a 2 stories and 35 "Public Suffix" (P) ft. for roofs designations having a pitch greater than 3/12. Maximum Height See RMC 4-4- See RMC 4-4- See RMC 4-4- See RMC 4-4- for Wireless 140G. 140G. 140G. 140G. Communication Facilities H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\E. 4-2-110 A.docLast printed 11/3/2004 3:25 PMPage 3 of 5 R-1 Cluster Code Amendment Draft November 3, 2004 RC R-1 R-4 R-8 BUILDING STANDARDS (Continued) Maximum Lots 5 acres or 35%. Lots greater Lots 5,000 sq. ft. Building more: 2%. An than 5,000 sq. or greater: 35% Coverage additional 5% of ft.: 35% or or 2,500 sq. ft., (Including primary the total area 2,500 sq. ft., whichever is and accessory may be used for whichever is greater. buildings) agricultural greater. buildings. Lots less than Lots 5,000 sq. 5,000 sq. ft.: Lots 10,000 sq. ft. or less: 50 /0 50 /o. ft. to 5 acres: 15%. On lots greater than 1 acre, an additional 5% of the total area may be used for agricultural buildings. Lots 10,000 sq. ft. or less: 35%. Vertical Fagade All dwelling units Modulation shall provide vertical fagade modulation at least every twenty horizontal feet (20'), including front, side and rear fagades when visible from a street. H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\E. 4-2-110 A.docLast printed 11/3/2004 3:25 PMPage 4 of 5 R-1 Cluster Code Amendment Draft November 3, 2004 RC R-1 R-4 R-8 LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE Minimum Off- 5 ft. wide irrigated 5 ft. wide irrigated Site or drought or drought Landscaping resistant resistant Abutting Non- landscape strip landscape strip Arterial Public provided that if provided that if Streets for Plats there is additional there is additional and Short Plants undeveloped right undeveloped right Submitted on or of way in excess of way in excess after November of 5 ft, this shall of 5 ft, this shall 10, 2004 also be also be landscaped. landscaped. Minimum Off- 10 ft. wide 10 ft. wide Site irrigated or irrigated or Landscaping drought resistant drought resistant Abutting landscape strip landscape strip Principal, provided that if provided that if Minor and there is additional there is additional Collector undeveloped right undeveloped right Arterial Streets of way in excess of way in excess for Plats and of 10 ft., this shall of 10 ft., this shall Short Plants also be also be Submitted on or landscaped, landscaped, after November unless otherwise unless otherwise 10, 2004 determined by the determined by reviewing official the reviewing during the official during the subdivision subdivision process. process. Minimum On or At least two (2) At least two (2) Off -Site Street trees of a City- trees of a City - Tree approved species approved species Requirements with a minimum with a minimum for Plats and caliper of 1 1/z" per caliper of 1 1/z" Short Plants tree shall be per tree shall be Submitted on or planted in the planted in the after November front yard or front yard or 10, 2004 planting strip of planting strip of every lot prior to every lot prior to occupancy. occupancy. H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\E. 4-2-110 A.docLast printed 11/3/2004 3:25 PMPage 5 of 5 4-2-110D 4-2-110D To be amended by the following changes CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS 1. a. Phasing, shadow platting, or land reserves may be used to satisfy the minimum density requirements if the applicant can demonstrate that the current development would not preclude the provision of adequate access and infrastructure to future development and would allow for the eventual satisfaction of minimum density requirements through future development. b. In the event the applicant can show that the minimum density cannot be achieved due to lot configuration, lack of access, environmental or physical constraints, minimum density requirements may be waived by the Reviewing Official. 2_-2--Use-related provisions are not variable. Use -related provisions that are not eligible for a variance include: building size, units per structure/lot, or densities. Unless bonus size or density provisions are specifically authorized, the modification of building size, units per structure, or densities requires a legislative change in the code provisions and/or a Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezone. 3_Clustering Fa3-beis allowed to meet objectives such as preserving significant natural features, providing neighborhood open space, or facilitating the provision of sewer service. Within urban separators designated in the Countywide Planning Policies clustering is required; H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\4-2-110 D.doc -3 Cluster development is subject to the following standards_= a. Cl developments shall be limited te f 4 1 + 1„ter b. The maximum net density requirement shall not be exceeded. c. The area of individual lots shall not be less than 4,500 sq. ft. d. Except for density, the remaining development standards of the Residential-8 Dwelling Units Per Acre Zone) shall apply e Within designated Urban Separators: (i) All subdivision and short subdivisions shall be clustered. (ii) Development shall be clustered away from sensitive areas or the axis of designated corridors or community separators to the extent possible. (iii) The men space created by clustering shall be placed in separate permanent tracts that may include critical areas and shall total as least fifes percent of the site. (iv) Open space tracts shall be configured to connect greenbelt or wildlife corridors wherepossible. (v) Open space tracts shall not be altered or disturbed Passive recreation (with no development of recreational facilities) and natural -surface pedestrian and equestrian trails are acceptable uses within open space tracts. NO The tracts may be: (a) retained by the subdivider 4- (b) conveyed to the residents of the development (c) or conveyed to a third party. 4. Allowed Projections into Setbacks: a. Fireplace Structures, Windows: Fireplace structures, bay or garden windows, enclosed stair landings, and similar structures as Zoning Administrator may project 24" into any setback; provided, such projections are: (i) Limited to 2 per fagade. (ii) Not wider than 10'. b. Fences: See RMC 4-4-040. Steps and Decks: Uncovered steps and decks not exceeding 18" above the finished grade may project to any property line. Uncovered steps and decks having no roof covering and not exceeding 42" high may be built within the front yard setback. d. Eaves: Eaves and cornices may project up to 24" into any required setback. 5. In order to be considered detached, a structure must be sited a minimum of 6' from any residential structure. 6. A front yard setback of less than 20' is allowed if equal to or greater than the average of the front yard setback of the existing, abutting primary structures; however, in no case shall a minimum setback of less than 20' be allowed for garages which access from the front yard street(s). 7. For pre-existing legal lots having less than the minimum lot width required by this Section, the following chart shall apply for determining the required minimum side yard width along a street: WIDTH OF I MINIMUM HAMNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\4-2-110 D.doc EXISTING LEGAL LOT SIDE YARD WIDTH ALONG A STREET RC ZONE 150 feet or less 25 ft. R-1 ZONE Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10 ft. 50.1 to 51 ft. 11 ft. 51.1 to 52 ft. 12 ft. 52.1 to 53 ft. 13 ft. 53.1 to 54 ft. 14 ft. 54.1 to 55 ft. 15 ft. 55.1 to 56 ft. 16 ft. 56.1 to 57 ft. 17 ft. 57.1 to 58 ft. 18 ft. 58.1 to 59 ft. 19 ft. 59.1ft. and reater 19 ft. R-4 or R-8 ZONE Less than or equal to 50 ft. 10 ft. 50.1 to 52 ft. 11 ft. 52.1 to 54 ft. 12 ft. 54.1 to 56 ft. 13 ft. 56.1 to 58 ft. 14 ft. 58.1 ft. or greater 15 ft. However, in no case shall a structure over 42" in height intrude into the 20' clear vision area defined in RMC 4-11- 030. 8. In no case shall building height exceed the maximum allowed by the Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions, for uses located within the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Zones designated under RMC 4-3-020. 9. "Public Suffix" (P) properties are allowed the following height bonus: Publicly owned structures shall be permitted an additional 15' in height above that otherwise permitted in the zone if "pitched roofs," as defined herein, are used for at least 60% or more of the roof surface of both primary and accessory structures. In addition, the height of a publicly owned structure -2- may be increased as follows, up to a maximum height of 75' to the highest point of the building: a. When abutting a public street, 1 additional foot of height for each additional 1-1/2' of perimeter building setback beyond the minimum street setback required; and/or b. When abutting a common property line, 1 additional foot of height for each additional 2' of perimeter building setback beyond the minimum required along a common property line. 10. In order to serve as a transition between the lower density R-4 zone and the higher density R-8 zone "small lot clusters" of up to a maximum of 50 lots shall be allowed within 600 feet of an R- 8 zone when at least 30% of the site is permanently set aside as "significant open space." Such open space shall be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other development in the zone. The percentage of open space required may be reduced by the reviewing official to 20% of the site when: a) Public access is provided to open space, _b) Soft surface trails are provided within wetland buffers, and c) Store water ponds are designed to eliminate engineered slopes requiring fencing and enhanced to allow passive and/or active recreation. 11. a) Lot size width and depth may be reduced by the reviewing official when, due to lot configuration or access, 4- dwelling units per net acre cannot be H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\4-2-110 D.doc achieved. The reduction shall be the minimum needed to allow 4-dwelling units per net acre and shall be limited to the following minimum dimensions: Lot size - 7,200 sq. ft Lot depth — 70 feet Lot width - 60 feet 12. When lot size is reduced for the purpose of achieving maximum density, setbacks may also be reduced. Setback reductions shall be limited to the following: Front — 20 feet. Side yard along a street — 15 feet primary structure, 20 feet attached garage with access from the side yard. Minimum side yard combined setback — 15 feet. Minimum for one yard — 5 feet. 13. For properties vested with a complete plat application prior to Nov. 10, 2004, and for the Mosier II, Maplewood East and Anthone, the following standards apply. Vested plats must be developed within 5 years of preliminary plat approval and/or annexation. Maximum Density - 5 dwelling units per net acre Minimum Lot Size - 7,200 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width - 60 feet for interior lots, 70 feet for corner lots Minimum Lot Depth - 70 feet Minimum Front Yard - 15 feet for the primary structure, 20 feet for an attached or detached garage. For a unit with alley access garage, the front yard setback for the primary structure may be -3- reduced to 10 feet if all parking is provided in the rear yard of the lot with access from a public right of way or alley. Minimum Side Yard Along a Street - 15 feet Minimum Side Yard - 5 feet (Amd. Ord. 4963, 5-13-2002) H:\EDNSP\Title IV\R-1 Clustering\4-2-110 D.doc -4- Submitted by J. Rollins CL USTERING & OPEN SPACE Question: "What is open space in King County?" The short answer: open space are areas of natural, unaltered, undisturbed permanent dedicated tracts as codified in King County Code, Title 21A. In Greenbelt/Urban/Community Separators, King County code requires clustering, and designated open space tracts of at least 50% of the site. The open space tracts "...shall not be altered or disturbed..." "Passive recreation (with no development of recreational facilities) and natural -surface pedestrian and equestrian trails are acceptable uses within an open space tract." METROPOLITAN KING COUNTY CODE Specific Metropolitan King County Code (K.C.C.) pertinent to Greenbelt/Urban/Community Separators follows: 0 Title 21A.12.03017a. "all subdivisions and short subdivisions in the R-1 zone shall be required to be clustered if the property is located within or contains: (1) a floodplain, (2) a critical aquifer recharge area, (3) a Regionally or Locally Significant Resource Area, (4) existing or planned pubic parks or trails, or connection to such facilities, (S) a Class I or II stream or wetland, or (6) a steep slope, or (7) a "greenbelt/urban separator" or "wildlife corridor" area designated by the Comprehensive Plan or Community Plan. 0 17b. "The development shall be clustered away from sensitive areas or the axis of designated corridors such as urban separators or the wildlife habitat network to the extent possible and the open space shall be placed in a separate tract that includes at least fifty percent of the site. Open space tracts shall be permanent and shall be dedicated to a homeowner's association or other suitable organization, as determined by the director, and meet the requirements of K. C.C. 21A.14.040. On -site sensitive area and buffers, wildlife habitat networks, required habitat and buffers for protected species and designated urban s. separators shall be placed within the open space tract to the extent possible. Passive recreation (with no development of recreational facilities) and natural - surface pedestrian and equestrian trails are acceptable uses within the open space tract. " 0 Title 21A.14.040 A.: "In the R zones, any designated open space tract resulting from lot clustering shall not be altered or disturbed except as specified on recorded documents creating the open space. Open spaces may be retained under ownership by the subdivider, conveyed to residents of the development, or conveyed to a third party. If access to the open space is provided, the access shall be located in a separate tract:" 0 Title 21A.14.040 C. "In the R-1 zone, open space tracts created by clustering required by K.C.C. 21A 12.030 shall be located and configured to create urban separators and greenbelts required by the Comprehensive Plan, or subarea plans or open space functional plans to connect and protect wildlife habitat corridors designated by the Comprehensive Plan and to connect existing or planned public parks or trails. King County may require open space tracts created under this subsection to be dedicated to an appropriate managing public agency or qualifying private entity such as a nature conservancy. In the absence of such a requirement, open space tracts shall be retained in undivided interest by the residents of the subdivision or short subdivision. A homeowner's association shall be established for maintenance of the open space tract. " DEFINITION: 0 Title 21A.06.819: "Open space: areas left predominately in a natural state to create urban separators and greenbelts, sustain native ecosystems, connect and increase protective buffers for environmentally sensitive areas, provide a visual contrast to continuous development, reinforce community identity and aesthetics, or provide links between important environmental or recreational resources." PROPOSED CITY OF RENTON CODE Therefore to make Renton code consistent with K.C.C. the essential elements of open space tracts in Community Separators must be permanent designated tracts which are natural, unaltered, undisturbed and are configured to connect greenbelt or wildlife corridors. $ Cl) = 175th le SEA 177th Ave SE co `L N C � M N liJ s ' CA w N 169th Ave -SE 168th Ave SE ,F 164th Ave SE — 4J 65, t � v U W N JO a5 156th Ave SE — Qi gE Mai41 �_ ; .....F jjq�,,.---- ; �C L V) 148th a SE <t., N144th Ave SE V 138th Ave SE a t f/ _,• Union Ave NE 1j cb 0 Monroe Ave NE Z)�J Cl 1 �b r 1 J t E ~ Z W 2 ' i t Edm_ ondsAve NE - Edmon_ds Ave.NE_ f 1 A e NE y� o t ap w - A O cd O o "'0 sGySeM cl t ° r• cV M O A �- O O `-. Vz , t F — F�- a - •N AV NJEd`SS\��E S . ma x•- . NAV 1; F` 65 '2 (M a i -cn ,. <0 inier,Ave N. i D LT u,: r _ CO cn T _ 128th Ave SEA w cn U , -- CO' to 116th Ave SE - 116th . Q VJ r N l _ E.Valley,Rd . I 1 1 �• AN FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT November_22, 2004 Date APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on November 22, 2004, claim vouchers 232026- 232509 and 3..wire trans.fers;. totaling $2,414,274.20 , and 569.direct deposits, payroll vouchers 54437-54656, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $1,791,478.80 . FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT November 22, 2004 APMMIED BY 0TV COUNM Date Property Lease and Caretaker's Agreement with Leroy Coffman (Referred November 8; 2004) / zcyl, Don Persson, Substitute Member cc: Dennis Culp, Victoria Runkle Peter Renner i� as-aooy From: Julie Brewer To: Council News Date: 11 A 9/2004 9:28:32 AM Subject: Fwd: Renton School District good news FYI - From the Renton School District >>> "Randy Matheson" <randy.matheson@renton.wednet.edu> 11/18/2004 10:01:32 AM >>> Below are good news announcements read by school board members at last night's meeting. Please share these at City Council meetings. Thank you for your continued support. Randy Matheson Executive Director, Community Relations Renton School District 425.204.2345 rmatheson @ renton.wednet.edu "GOOD NEWS" ANNOUNCEMENTS November 17, 2004 * Two Lindbergh High School students have been recognized by Washington State University's Regents Scholarship Program. Melissa Carlson has been selected to receive a Crimson Regents Scholarship worth $3,000, renewable for a second year, for a total of $6,000. Mehak Ahluwalia has been selected to receive a Silver Regents Scholarship worth $4,000, renewable for a second year, for a total of $8,000. The University grants these awards to a select group of the state's finest and most promising high school scholars. * Kate Schafer, a sophomore at Hazen High School, is the state swimming champion in the Class 3A 200-yard freestyle. Kate came from behind to win the race with a time of 1:53. Kate also won the bronze medal in the 500-yard freestyle race. Also placing in the state championship was Hazen's Brynn Stenslie who took seventh place in the 1-meter diving competition. Hazen's girls swim team took 10th place overall in the competition. Also in swimming news: Lindbergh High School girls swim coach Roger Miron was named girls swim coach of the year by coaches in the Seamount League. * Lindbergh High School senior Sam Ahlbeck won the individual title in the state cross country championships in Pasco. He led most of the race and won the 3.1 mile race with a time of 15:45. Sam, who placed seventh last year, said he pushed himself through the last 200 meters thinking, 'I'll never get this moment back. I don't want to leave and want something more. I wanted to be number one real bad.' Also in cross country news: Hazen's girls and boys cross country teams both won league championship titles. Additionally, Lance Winmill, Renton High School's girls cross country coach, was named coach of the year by coaches in the King Division. * Kara Bradford, a teacher at Lindbergh High School and a Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) member, was recently first on the scene of a serious car accident and used her skills to provide aid to the victims before emergency personnel arrived. After emergency personnel took over the duties of attending to the injured, Kara, following the instructions of fire fighters, assisted with rerouting traffic and removing victims who were trapped in their cars. Kara says the CERT program gave her extra confidence, knowledge and calmness to take the medical disaster issues into her own hands. * Two Renton students were recently selected by the Seattle Times to preview recently -released films. Zachary Zimmerman, a fourth -grader at Cascade Elementary School, and Kaela Nurmi, a sixth -grader at Nelsen Middle School, participated in a movie critics contest for children ages 8-11. Zachary and Kaela were two of eight finalists selected from over 200 entries. The students previewed The Polar Express, The Incredibles, The Bad Beginning, and Sponge Bob The Movie. The group then wrote reviews of the movies and discussed their reviews with the Seattle Times movie critic. The students' reviews and photos were published in the Nov. 6 edition of the Seattle Times. * McKnight Middle School parents recently launched a volunteer program to coordinate volunteers at the school. Four McKnight parents, Pam Teal, Michelle Williams, Karen Weber, and Cindy DeWan, spearheaded the program to train more than 60 volunteers to work in classrooms, cafeteria, hallways, offices, on committees, as grant writers, tutors, mentors, and subject area experts. All volunteers receive training and a picture ID, and will become an integral part of school operations. The volunteer program will help find meaningful ways for parents to engage in their children's school experience while creating an even safer, more supportive atmosphere at McKnight. * Maplewood Heights staff and PTA recently held a family math night. About 200 people came to school for math activities planned by each grade level. The evening also included packets of math activities to take home and a chance to win a gift basket of books and math tools. * Sally Carter, the district's facilitator for special programs, was one of 500 educators, early learning professionals, and community leaders from across the state invited by Governor Gary Locke and Superintendent Terry Bergeson to participate in the recent Washington School Readiness Summit. Work produced at the summit includes a preliminary draft of the Washington State Early Learning and Development Benchmarks, a new tool for increasing understanding of what children need to know and be able to do when they enter school. * Dimmitt Middle School students, under the direction of Claudia Paul, have again teamed up with Thomson Early Childhood Center's kindergartners for the Reading Buddies program. Each Friday, Dimmitt seventh -graders walk across the street to Thomson to read, write and have fun with kindergarten students. The successful program is rewarding for both the Dimmitt and Thomson students. * Tiffany Park Elementary School has won a $1,000 grant and a greenhouse from the Washington Potato Commission, King 5 TV and other organizations to help students study science and as a means to include a segment of the community in an activity that is culturally familiar to them. The grant was initiated by the school's family liaison and several classroom teachers. * Bryn Mawr Elementary School recently played host to KCTS TV, Seattle Mariner pitcher Shigetoshi Hasegawa and the Mariner Moose as they celebrated Channel 9's presentation of the Golden Apple Award to the Page Ahead organization. Page Ahead was honored for their contribution to the education of Washington students. For the past five years, Page Ahead has provided every Bryn Mawr student with three new books each year, for a total value of over $25,000. Bryn Mawr staff nominated Page Ahead for the award. The day's event also included a Breakfast Book Nook Morning, where parents were treated to coffee and doughnuts and students were presented with a_free book to take home. KCTS soon will present Bryn Mawr parents with a Kids Read program, providing ideas about linking reading to Children's Television Programs. * The Renton Rotary has selected Teachers of the Month for November. These teachers were recognized at a Rotary luncheon and presented $100 to be used for supplies, classroom improvements or instructional materials. The recipients are: Marcella Caruso, a social studies and language arts teacher at Nelsen Middle School. Marcella earned her bachelor's degree in history from Western Washington University. She taught in the Bellevue School District prior to coming to Renton in 2003. Kathryn Smith is a full time kindergarten teacher at Talbot Hill Elementary School. Kathryn earned her bachelor's degree in vocal & instrumental from the University of Nebraska and her master's degree in music in education from the University of Iowa. She began her teaching career in 1979 in Oceanside, CA. Kathryn has worked in Renton since 2002. Susan Johnson, a teacher in the Career & Life Skills Program at Renton High School. Susan earned her bachelor's degree in dance from Connecticut College and her master's degree in dance from Mills College. She began teaching in Renton in 1997.