Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 10/04/2004
AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING October 4, 2004 Monday, 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATIONS: a. National Domestic Violence Awareness Month - October, 2004 b. Fire Prevention Week - October 3 to 9, 2004 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Planning/Building/Public Works Department Employee Recognition 5. PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE INITIATOR: Wedgewood Lane Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for 12.73 acres located south of NE 10th St. (SE 116th St.) and east of Jericho Ave. NE 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of September 27, 2004. Council concur. b. Community Services Department submits CAG-03-029, Henry Moses Aquatic Center; and requests approval of the project, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $203,585 to Powell Construction Company, contractor, if all releases are obtained. Council concur. c. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of dedication of additional right-of-way at the corner of Blaine Ave. NE and NE 20th St. to fulfill a requirement of the MoJo Short Plat (SHP-04-054). Council concur. d. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of $115,128.96 with Entranco for design of the Benson Rd. S. (Main Ave. to S. 26th St.) project, and other minor pedestrian mobility improvements. Council concur. 9. CORRESPONDENCE a. E-mail from Richard D. Zwicker, North Renton Neighborhood Association President, PO Box 326, Renton, 98057, regarding truck traffic in the North Renton neighborhood (Park Ave. N., N. 3rd St., and N. 4th St.). b. E-mail from Jacqueline Spears, 2713 NE 23rd Pl., Renton, 98056, reporting speeding traffic on NE 23rd Pl., and requesting something be done to slow the traffic down. c. Letter from Kevin M. Wyman, 16540 SE 149th St., Renton, 98059, requesting connection to Renton's sewer for a future single-family residence located at 154XX SE 132nd St. (Lot #4, Cedar Crest Estates). Refer to Utilities Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) d. Letter from D.E. Blood, 3711 Park Ave. N., Renton, 98056, requesting connection to Renton's sewer for his property located at 154XX SE 132nd St. (Lot #3, Cedar Crest Estates). Refer to Utilities Committee. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 13. AUDIENCE COMMENT 14. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 5:30 p.m. Emerging Issues; Highlands Enforcement Emphasis Briefing; Highlands Redevelopment Update Briefing; Active Shooter/Hostage DRILL Briefing Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST . TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 4, 2004 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF DON PERSSON, Council President; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; COUNCILMEMBERS DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW; TERRI BRIERE; MARCIE PALMER. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; REBECCA LIND, Planner Manager; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF LEE WHEELER, DEPUTY CHIEF LARRY RUDE, and FIRE INSPECTOR TED HICKEY, Fire Department; TINA HARRIS, Domestic Violence Court Advocate, COMMANDER TIM TROXEL, Police Department. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the month of National Domestic Violence October, 2004, to be "National Domestic Violence Awareness Month" in the Awareness Month - October, City of Renton and encouraging everyone in the community to take an active 2004 role in supporting all victims so they can lead healthy lives safe from violent and abusive behavior. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. Domestic Violence Court Advocate Tina Harris accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Renton Domestic Violence Task Force. Fire Prevention Week - A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the week of October 3 to 9, 2004 October 3 to 9, 2004, to be "Fire Prevention Week" in the City of Renton and encouraging all citizens to join in this special observance commemorating the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 that killed more than 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless, and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. Deputy Fire Chief Larry Rude and Fire Investigator/Public Educator Ted Hickey accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Renton Fire Department, and they encouraged everyone to follow fire prevention measures such as replacing batteries in smoke detectors, and practicing home fire escape plans. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator introduced Public Works: Employee the Planning/Building/Public Works employees nominated and chosen by their Recognition peers to receive "Good Works" awards, as follows: Amber Hoffman, Secretary (not present); Bob Mahn, Civil Engineer (not present); Hema Thanedar, Office Aide; and Da Peng Yue, Engineering Specialist. The "Amazing Sparkler" award was presented to George Stahl, Maintenance Services Supervisor. Mr. Zimmerman then presented the 2004 Planning/Building/Public Works Employee of the Year award to Clarice Martin, Administrative Secretary. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Wedgewood accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Lane, NE loth & Jericho Ave public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent petition for the proposed October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 333 Wedgewood Lane Annexation for 12.73 acres bounded on the west by a portion of the Renton City limits; on the north by SE 116th St. (NE loth St.); on the south by approximately SE 121st St., if extended; and on the east by Honey Creek and its wetlands. Rebecca Lind, Planner Manager, stated that the site contains one single-family. dwelling; slopes down from the northwest corner towards Honey Creek at an eight percent slope; and is bounded by Honey Creek headwaters on its eastern edge. Honey Creek and its wetlands buffers comprise twenty-five percent of the site. Ms. Lind noted that public services are provided by Fire District #10, Water District #90, Renton Sewer, and the Issaquah School District. Ms. Lind reported that current King County zoning is R-4 (four units per gross acre), and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Low Density, for which future R-4 (four units per net acre) zoning is proposed. She stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $13,076 at full development, assuming an increase to 44 single-family homes. The one-time parks acquisition and development costs is estimated at $23,982. Continuing, Ms. Lind said the proposed annexation is consistent with Renton policies, and furthers City business goals. She noted potential flooding in the area, which will be mitigated with future development, and pointed out that except for parks, no major service issues were identified. Ms. Lind indicated that some parties may be interested in expanding the annexation boundary to the north. Public comment was invited. Dick Gilroy, Land Trust Company, 1560 140th Ave. NE, Suite 100, Bellevue, 98005, voiced his support for the proposed annexation, and indicated that he is available to answer any questions Council may have. Angel Anderson, 14406 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, stated that her property borders the northwest frontage of the annexation site. She expressed concern regarding emergency response times, saying that confusion may occur as to which jurisdiction is responsible for her residence. Ms. Anderson requested that her property be included in the annexation area. Continuing, Ms. Anderson read a letter from her next -door neighbor Pat Blankenship, 14418 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, who also requested inclusion of her property in the annexation area. Renee Korsmo, 14522 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, stated that her home borders the northeast corner of the annexation site, and asked that her property be included with the annexation area. She indicated that she is impressed with the Renton community and enjoys the many amenities the City offers. Ms. Korsmo noted that she was unable to contact the two property owners to the west of her property. Suellen Warnes stated that she lives at 14620 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, and owns 14600 SE 116th St., both of which adjoin the previous speaker's property. She requested that her properties be included with the annexation area. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 334 MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE WEDGEWOOD LANE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION, AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% DIRECT PETITION SUBJECT TO: EXPANDING THE ANNEXATION SITE NORTH TO INCLUDE THE FIVE PARCELS IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF TAX LOT 1023059004 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SE 116TH ST.; R-4 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUMING A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS.* MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO EXPAND THE ANNEXATION SITE TO INCLUDE THE THREE PARCELS TO THE EAST (of the added five parcels). CARRIED. *MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. (See page 337 for additional action on this matter.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted included: • Almost forty different organizations and thousands of individuals benefit from the combined volunteer efforts of 2004 Citizen of the Year Marcie Maxwell, and 2004 Outstanding Citizens Norma Cugini and Marge Richter. • The Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry was held on September 25th, resulting in the collection of $1,000 and more than 8,000 pounds of food, nearly double that of last year. • Renton residents may purchase flood insurance for their homes if they live in a designated flood hazard area, and not just within the floodplains of the Cedar River, Green River, May Creek, or Springbrook Creek. Maps of Renton's erosion and flood hazard areas are available at Renton City Hall, 6th floor, and on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us. Streets: Rename SW 41st St to Mayor Keolker-Wheeler requested that her memorandum addressed to the SW IKEA Way Councilmembers be read into the record as follows: Since the prospect of renaming SW 41st St. as SW IKEA Way was first brought to you in June, staff has spent considerable time and energy working to communicate the reasons behind and the impacts of this change to the affected businesses in the area. We believe this action would appropriately acknowledge the contributions of IKEA to this community and, frankly, make it difficult for the company to consider alternative locations should the notion arise in the future. As you know, several businesses have since come forward outlining additional financial impacts of the decision. I have become convinced that these newly presented impacts are real and significant for these small businesses. Today, I received a letter from DMA co-owner Anders Berglund regretfully requesting that Council reconsider its decision. Over the past week, staff and I have been working to find a solution to this situation. Therefore, I propose the City Council consider the following package of actions that will achieve our goal of showing IKEA our appreciation for its October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 335 contributions to the community on the occasion of its loth Anniversary celebration. Proclaim the week of October 17 to 23, 2004, as IKEA Week in the City of Renton Install decorative banners that would be hung on City -owned lampposts honoring IKEA for "keeping Renton ahead of the curve." Lodging tax proceeds would be used to pay for this as IKEA brings hundreds of thousands of people from all over the Pacific Northwest to the store each year, many of whom utilize the local hotels, eat in our restaurants, and enjoy the many wonderful things Renton has to offer. Participate in the loth Anniversary festivities at IKEA on October 23, 2004, and present IKEA's owners Bjorn Bayley and Anders Berglund with the "Key to the City" in honor of their significant contributions to the community. Designate the area bordered by SW 43rd St. and SW 41st St. and East Valley Hwy. and Oakesdale Ave. as the IKEA Commercial District, and provide signage to that effect on City -owned lampposts at entrance points to the district. This designation would have no impact on local businesses other than providing a reference point that they could choose to use or ignore at their discretion. • Continue to work with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to provide highway signage on SR-167. Rescind City Council action renaming SW IKEA Way. Based on your direction tonight, I will bring forward the necesgary legislation for these actions at your October 11, 2004, meeting. While I am disappointed with all the negative publicity surrounding this issue, I hope the proposed package meets the needs of the Council in honoring a business that has made such noteworthy contributions to the Renton community. A letter addressed to the Mayor was also read from Anders Berglund, IKEA co- owner, 600 SW 43rd St., Renton, 98055, stating that he and Bjorn Bayley were flattered that the Council wanted to honor IKEA's contributions to the community by renaming SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Way. He pointed out that despite IKEA's large sign, customers have a hard time finding the store, and additional signage along SR-167 would help. Mr. Berglund indicated that he was not prepared for the outcry from the affected businesses, noting that several business have come forward and outlined significant costs associated with the street name change. He stated that it was never his intent to put a burden on the affected business owners, and the burden outweighs the potential benefit of the street name change. Therefore, Mr. Berglund requested that the City Council reconsider its decision. Mr. Berglund concluded his letter by stating that IKEA's commitment to the community is stronger than ever. Councilman Law stated that the letter shows that IKEA is a class act, and he commended the Administration for putting together a package of actions for recognizing IKEA's contributions. Councilman Clawson also expressed his appreciation for the Administration's efforts, but pointed out that other cities will try to entice IKEA away from Renton. He emphasized that the City has to work hard to make IKEA stay, as October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 336 the loss of IKEA would hurt Renton's budget. Noting the importance of an IKEA highway sign, he said if an agreement for a sign is not reached with WSDOT, he would once again consider renaming SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Way. Councilman Clawson indicated that he owes it to the people who elected him to keep IKEA in Renton, and if the renaming of the street hurts people, mitigation by the City, IKEA, or both should be instituted. In response to Councilwoman Nelson's comments regarding a highway sign advertising IKEA's restaurant, Councilwoman Palmer explained that IKEA tried to do that; however, WSDOT did not agree. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler noted that the City is continuing to work with WSDOT for signage on SR-167. Councilwoman Palmer stated that one of the goals of the street name change was to not only honor IKEA, but to give the affected business area an identity. Stating that the intent was not to hurt the small businesses, it was MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RESCIND ITS VOTE TAKEN AT THE AUGUST 23, 2004, CITY COUNCIL MEETING, CONCURRING IN THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT TO RENAME SW 41ST ST. TO SW IKEA WAY. CARRIED. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THAT THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 17 TO 23, 2004, BE PROCLAIMED AS IKEA WEEK IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THAT DECORATIVE BANNERS BE HUNG ON CITY -OWNED LAMPPOSTS HONORING IKEA FOR "KEEPING RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE"; THAT THE CITY PARTICIPATE IN THE LOTH ANNIVERSARY FESTIVITIES AT IKEA ON OCTOBER 23, 2004, AND PRESENT IKEA'S OWNERS WITH THE "KEY TO THE CITY" IN HONOR OF THEIR SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COMMUNITY; THAT THE AREA BORDERED BY SW 43RD AND SW 41ST STREETS AND EAST VALLEY HWY. AND OAKESDALE AVE. BE DESIGNATED AS THE IKEA COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND PROVIDE SIGNAGE TO THAT EFFECT ON CITY -OWNED LAMPPOSTS AT ENTRANCE POINTS TO THE DISTRICT; AND THAT THE CITY CONTINUE TO WORK WITH WSDOT TO PROVIDE HIGHWAY SIGNAGE ON SR-167 TO THE IKEA COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. CARRIED. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the proclamation and legislation will be presented at the next Council meeting. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jan Dressler, Dressler Stencil Company, 253 SW 41st St., Renton, 98055, Citizen Comment: Dressler - thanked Council for rescinding its decision to rename SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Rename SW 41st St to SW Way. IKEA Way Citizen Comment: Doremus - Chuck Doremus, ACT III Catering, 279 SW 41st St., Renton, 98055, reported Rename SW 41st St to SW that he was contacted about the street name change from SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Way IKEA Way and did expressed his opinion on the matter. He stated his appreciation for all the thought and concerns that went into the decision to rescind the street name change. . Citizen Comment: Jones - David Jones, West Coast Painting, 265 SW 41st St., Renton, 98055, stated that Rename SW 41st St to SW it is difficult to start a business and keep it afloat, and expressed his support for IKEA Way the decision made to rescind the name change of SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Way. Mr. Jones also voiced his appreciation to the owners of IKEA for recognizing the burden the name change would have on the affected businesses. October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 337 Citizen Comment: Rynning - David Rynning, 14619 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, requested that his Wedgewood Lane Annexation, property, which is approximately 2.25 acres and includes the house and three NE loth St & Jericho Ave NE tax parcels, be annexed into the City of Renton as part of the Wedgewood Lane Annexation area. He pointed out that the west line of his property is on the east demarcation of the annexation site. Mr. Rynning explained that annexing the remaining neighborhood along SW 116th St., east to 148th Ave. SE, would complete the utility grid and add revenue to the City's tax base. At the City Attorney's suggestion to readopt the motion pertaining to the Wedgewood Lane Annexation if Council wanted to add the additional parcels, it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE WEDGEWOOD LANE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION, AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% DIRECT PETITION SUBJECT TO: EXPANDING THE ANNEXATION SITE NORTH TO INCLUDE THE FIVE PARCELS IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF TAX LOT 1023059004 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SE 116TH ST.; EXPANDING THE ANNEXATION SITE TO INCLUDE THE THREE PARCELS TO THE EAST (of the added five parcels); EXPANDING THE ANNEXATION SITE TO INCLUDE THE THREE PARCELS ASSOCIATED WITH 14619 SE 116TH ST.; R4 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUMING A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilwoman Palmer, added item 8.e. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of September 27, 2004. -Council concur. September 27, 2004 CAG: 03-029, Henry Moses Community Services Department submitted CAG-03-029, Henry Moses Aquatic Center, Powell Aquatic Center; and requested approval of the project, commencement of 60- Construction Company day lien period, and release of retained amount of $203,585 to Powell Construction Company, contractor, if all releases are obtained. Council concur. Development Services: MoJo Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of Short Plat, Blaine Ave NE & additional right-of-way at the corner of Blaine Ave. NE and NE 20th St. to NE 20th St, SHP-04-054 fulfill a requirement of MoJo Short Plat (SHP-04-054). Council concur. Transportation: Benson Rd S Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the (Main to 26th) Design, amount of $115,128.96 with Entranco for design of the Benson Rd. S. (Main Entranco Ave. S. to S. 26th St.) project, and other minor pedestrian mobility improvements. Council concur. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVED ADDED ITEM 8.e. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration City Clerk reported bid opening on 9/28/2004 for CAG-04-119, Monster Rd. Added Item 8.e, Bridge Repair; five bids; engineer's estimate $432,039; and submitted staff CAG: 04-119, Monster Rd recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Mowat Construction Bridge Repair, Mowat Company, in the amount of $449,800. Approval was also sought to transfer Construction Company funds from the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study ($100,000) and the Rainier Ave. Corridor Study ($60,000) to the Monster Rd. Bridge Repair account. October 4, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 338 MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 8.e. TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Richard D. Zwicker, North Renton Citizen Comment: Zwicker - Neighborhood Association President, PO Box 326, Renton, 98057, regarding North Renton Truck Traffic, truck traffic in the North Renton neighborhood (Park Ave. N., N. 3rd St. and N. Park Ave N, N 3rd St, N 4th St 4th St.), and suggesting ways to deal with the considerable truck traffic. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Spears - NE An e-mail was read from Jacqueline Spears, 2713 NE 23rd Pl., Renton, 98056, 23rd PI, Speeding Traffic reporting speeding traffic on NE 23rd Pl., and requesting that something be done to slow the traffic down such as the installation of a speed bump or stop sign. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Wyman - A letter was read from Kevin M. Wyman, 16540 SE 149th St., Renton, 98059, Sewer Service Connection requesting connection to Renton's sewer for a future single-family home located Request for Property Outside at 154XX SE 132nd St. (Lot #4, Cedar Crest Estates). City Limits, SE 132nd St Citizen Comment: Blood - A letter was read from D.E. Blood, 3711 Park Ave. N., Renton, 98056, Sewer Service Connection requesting connection to Renton's sewer for his property located at 154XX SE Request for Property Outside 132nd St. (Lot #3, Cedar Crest Estates). City Limits, SE 132nd St MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THESE TWO LETTERS TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Added Correspondence (14 items) was entered into the record concerning the issue of Citizen Comment: Various - the street name change from SW 41st St. to SW IKEA Way. (See page 334 for Rename SW 41st St to SW Council's discussion on the matter.) IKEA Way NEW BUSINESS Acknowledging the many resident concerns pertaining to traffic problems, Transportation: Traffic Councilwoman Palmer assured that the City is working on traffic calming. She Calming reported that there will be a special presentation on traffic calming at the next Council meeting, and the Transportation Committee will address the matter on October 21st. Development Services: Signs Councilman Corman commented on the comprehensive response from the City on Utility Poles Attorney concerning Councilwoman Nelson's inquiry about the posting of garage sale signs on telephone poles. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington clarified that it is not appropriate to post garage sale or other types of signs on City street poles and light poles. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: /8:54 p.m. x�A+�l,C� �A• Ct�GzC Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann October 4, 2004 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 4, 2004 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Persson) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Corman) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) MON., 10/11 Emerging Issues (to include setting date 6:00 p.m. for Council's 2005 Budget meeting) *Council Conference Room* Approximately Council Policy 800-01 Update; 6:30 p.m. Monster Road Bridge Repair Project; Comprehensive Plan Update Final Review and Approval *Council Chambers* MON., 10/11 Vouchers; 5:00 p.m. Petty Cash Funds Resolution 2614 Update THURS., 10/07 Shopping Cart Abandonment; 2:00 p.m. Hearing Examiner Concerns, Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations Revisions; Comprehensive Plan Text Amends, Map Amends and Zoning Text Amends TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 10/07 (Palmer) 4:30 p.m. UTILITIES (Clawson) THURS., 10/07 4:15 p.m. Airport Development Study (briefing only) Business Recycling Program Contract Amendment with Cascadia Consulting NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. CITY OF nENTON t X- Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Whef-ea-A,- domestic violence is a leading cause of death, killing more women than car crashes, muggings, and rape combined;. and Whe4-eaj,- it has been estimated that every nine seconds a woman is beaten by her husband or boyfriend in this country and, in more than half those instances, children under the age of 12 are present; and Whel-eaw, each year in our nation, male intimates kill 1,000 to 1,600 female partners; and Whey-eaw, research suggests that a large number of women who commit suicide do so because of their violent victimization at the hands of an intimate male partner; and WheYeaW, in Renton, 2,092 domestic violence offenses were reported in 2003 and 2,250 domestic violence offenses are expected to be reported by year-end 2004; and Whe -eat families and communities are strengthened by holding domestic violence perpetrators accountable for their crimes; and Whe -eat recognizing domestic violence victims is important for our communities to promote healing and empowerment; and Whey-eaW, October is nationally recognized as Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and increasing public awareness and understanding of domestic violence will promote safety, health, and wellness for victims; Nov, rlre�efoYe; I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim the month of October 2004 to be 4lva.,P-enew-Alonthl in the City of Renton, and encourage everyone in our community to take an active role in supporting all victims so they can lead healthy lives safe from violent and abusive behavior. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be. affixed this 41" day of October, 2004. . � AAlAA 7" eU-&& - �() kg�� Kathy Keejlker-Wheeler Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523 This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30%post consumer RE TN oN AHEAD OF THE CURVE Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler W herecw, in 1822, President Woodrow Wilson declared the week containing October 9`f' as Fire Prevention Week in special observance to the Great Chicago Fire of 1871; and W hewed, cooking, heating, and electrical fires represent three of the nation's leading causes of home fires and are collectively responsible for nearly half of all home fires and almost one- third of the associated fire deaths; and WheYea,; the vast majority of home cooling, heating, and electrical fires can be prevented by taking simple safety precautions; and Wh�.rea-S,, developing a home fire escape plan and practicing it at least twice a year are critical to escaping a fire safely; and W hetr'ect,k, proper installation, testing, and maintenance of smoke alarms are part of a thorough home fire escape plan; and W helve W, by preventing the leading causes of home fires, and by developing and practicing a thorough home escape plan, people can greatly reduce their fire risk; and W horea4; the fire service of the City of Renton, Washington, is dedicated to the safety of life and property from the devastating effects of fire; NCAV, rh xe om I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim the week of October 3-9, 2004, to be Fi6m P r"enruo-w W eek> in the City of Renton, and encourage all citizens to join me in this special observance commemorating the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 that killed more than 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless, and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 41h day of October, 2004. Kathy K lker-Wheeler Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington P' F-651\ENT®N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500/ r� . � -. -. ,23 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE VA + , R WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-4 ZONING October 4th 2004 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property owners in the proposed annexation area representing approximately 100% of the annexation area's assessed value. The site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is designated as Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site currently has County R-4 zoning which the City is recommending be rezoned upon annexation to the City's new R-4, four units per net acre, zone. With this zoning the site would accommodate approximately 44 additional single-family dwelling units. The annexation site abuts the City on a portion of its western boundary and is immediately east of the proposed Johnson Annexation. The southern boundary of the proposed annexation site is approximately SE 121St Street. The eastern edge of the annexation site is defined by the edge of wetlands associated with Honey Creek and Honey Creek's headwaters. The northern boundary currently is the southern edge of the SE 116d' Street right-of-way. Staff is recommending that this road right-of-way be added to the proposed annexation. Under RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing either at least 10% of the annexation area's assessed value or 10% of its area submitting a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition to City Council. The petitioner's currently represent 100% of the annexation site's total assessed value, excluding street right -of way. Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting in order to decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it likely will authorize the circulation a 60% Direct Petition to Annex that: 1. Requires the simultaneous adoption of R-4 zoning upon annexation; and, 2. Requires that property owners within the annexation area assume their share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. Recommendation: The Administration is recommending that Council modify the proposed boundaries of this annexation to include the SE 1101' Street right-of-way on its north and authorize the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition to Annex subject to the conditions outlined above. Council Hearing Handout 10-04-04.doc\ 'IY r�P r:: �• ;� L c' _ n ol v i•r mmoil- 7— LLI ►-I O _ � � s� .s rY_ os =' u � J Ce , J, t'L C n U m-oA 3 — X 7. = r o —% C_ 0 1- wJ j C_ >• >. � __ C Q T I C d q— ` C .J L C p t - L C 3 . rl x a)T a) w j E p a)-1 ��L LIM to, ,fit` � �� ��� a� o. =:!!RH®P' ti,�_ _•_'_�w.°�.c'`J �f .•: .t[t�i�i�{iL.;. 3 p O 3 W cp U y co r y r• .� ae- �.[$s NLtfi N a0 ow ., '�� ►,tia.A ^' Eiy `��m. LL� U � x p � � � r ,n .. ����n •u ���I�uor cC J h �a O c O M a) Mn O C. < U x s 0 a U a S~ E c • d T3 - • W w S OC N W � _ S✓ S✓ r v a) c� m + 0 .N c6 p rn O U -Co oaNE o Ta moo bA03 o m o t,cin� y aYi �� i 3✓ E �oNorn ECQ)m04 c'mU-`pQ) •� V a) N as 6 ►• T c'i cl X p o a)o o F-Zinmin m c0ONE W t�= 3 4-7 L].a N u � m m � j o m m m �m,� J No. m of U a U v of Y D O Y i.bb '! k� j`��e !'Sh• 5 r �` A r � ,C� � rf. 1CJ 'tf _ LIN- E.• r �"tee'. F,.r; ,� • 'xx i� -• t fl`.' T"7 � x � " " � � '� (� 1 CIO at .aM Q 6."A. ' y •'. Ih.' 3 a) (nQ m 30 O a7 -p CL , a) U O O C t@ to a)@ t% Y p to cy cT to c0 43) N : a) Co a) N r r i •�YL _ � U Cn >C o o o a) a (t: > X �I i i W c 2 L "w U I Y L3a f- 7 � T� bD .� c CL _ o V c z U aj > — a ^ U `o o r t o0 cC 1 J V c U a u L U �"� t J .V. Q L \ Q V3 Q O N C N f6 N U p C w O To C U Cl aC , 0a o m u, y O @ ° z C N N N n C N O o a, > C O m U Y U a 3 yw. O w =m (OD p n E N U C T m a, U' p a C a U a E c 5 ',n O N� C n D Ucc o '3 m m _ rn a c @ _O O O OC N N p N 3 N cn co o x w �j LLj th ci EL b4 mmiQ n : r ,, _ems N �I� V`r .� ■����� � � � � � z = E'er �Fiip�r L o r 1. o o s_ V s O G wJ o ce f U O U i Q G Q G cr Q' _ Ali C i ^ QL Qrci — 1 I Oct. 40', 2004 Hello, my name is Angel Anderson. I live at 14406 SE 116 ST in Renton. My husband, Patrick Anderson, myself, and our four children moved into this home six months ago. Our property (97 of an acre) will border the northwest frontage of the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation. We presently border the city of Renton on our west boundary. If this annexation goes through as proposed we will be boarded by the city of Renton on both our west and south property lines. We have a major concern with emergency response time. Because of our particular location, we are concerned there could be confusion with jurisdiction and fear that questions of who should respond to an emergency could arise. Being aware that we are in the urban growth boundary, we would like to ask Renton City Council to include our property in the Wedgewood Lane Annexation. We feel this would ensure our family that emergency services will be available without confusion. I would like to cite The City Of Renton Land Use Element, section III, policy LU-37, number 1. The highest priority areas for annexation to the city of Renton should be those contiguous with the boundaries of the city such as: # 1 Peninsulas and islands of unincorporated land where Renton is the logical service provider. This policy clearly states that property such as ours should have high priority in annexation. Having just recently learned about this annexation, I would like to commend the city for having staff that were willing to meet numerous times on very short notice. Thank you for your time. Angel Anderson Patrick Anderson Oct. 4t', 2004 Hello, my name is Pat Blankenship. I live at 14418 SE 116ST. in Renton. I live next door to Pat and Angel Anderson. My property will border the north frontage of the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation. I too would like Council to consider adding my property to the Wedgewood Lane Annexation. I feel it is important to have continuity of services. Thank you for your time. Pat Blankenship CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The October 2004 edition of CitySource, the City's newsletter to citizens and businesses, will be featured in the October 6 h issue of the Renton Reporter. This edition features detailed information about flood insurance options and safety precautions; the schedule changes for residential curbside garbage and recycling; Fall Recycling Day report; reminder about motorized foot scooter regulations; smoke alarm testing during Fire Prevention Week; Citizen of the Year award recipients; Fall events; September City Council highlights; and a calendar of upcoming events. CitySource can be found on the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, through the Spotlight section under the press release option. • Almost forty different organizations and thousands of individuals benefit from the combined volunteer efforts of 2004 Citizen of the Year Marcie Maxwell, and 2004 Outstanding Citizens Norma Cugini and Marge Richter. All will be recognized during the 2004 Citizen of the Year Banquet on Thursday, October 14`h. The banquet will be held at the Renton Senior Activity Center from 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. Cost per person is $25 and reservations can be made on-line at www.renton-chamber.com or by calling the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce at 425-226-4560. Reservations are requested by October 8t'. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry was held on Saturday, September 25,h. The result was the collection of $1,000 and more than 8,000 pounds of food, nearly double that of last year. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Earlington Hill Neighborhood Association, newly recognized by the City of Renton, will hold its first neighborhood meeting this Wednesday, October 6`�, at 7:00 p.m. at the First Baptist Church, 255 Hardie Ave. SW. Speakers will be Cyndie Parks, Community Program Coordinator; Police Chief Garry Anderson; and Norma McQuiller, Neighborhood Coordinator. All Earlington residents are encouraged to attend the meeting. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • If you live in Renton you may purchase flood insurance for your home, especially if you live in a designated flood hazard area, and not just within the floodplains of the Cedar River, Green River, May Creek, or Springbrook Creek. Maps of Renton's erosion and flood hazard areas are available at Renton City Hall, 6th floor, and on the City's website. Administrative Report October 4, 2004 Page 2 • Beginning on Monday, October 4"', Renton residents will see a change in the day their garbage, recycling, and yard waste are collected. In an effort to increase efficiency of residential curbside solid waste collection in Renton, all residential curbside pickups will occur on Monday and Tuesday. For more information you may call Waste Management at 1-800-592-9995. POLICE DEPARTMENT • This past weekend, Red Robin restaurants throughout Washington hosted the Special Olympics of Washington's "Tip a Cop" program. Because Renton does not have its own Red Robin, Renton police officers and City employees donated their time at the Issaquah restaurant and raised more than $2,000. Many other City of Renton employees visited the restaurant and made individual donations. To date, the Renton Police Department and participating City employees have raised a total of $5,100 for the Special Olympics. • The next Women's Personal Safety Class for the public is scheduled for Tuesday, December 7 h, from 6:30 to 9:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Pre -registration is required. In addition, October is Domestic Violence/Crime Prevention month. In a corroborative effort with the City's Domestic Violence Advocate and staff from area shelters, the women's personal safety class, including a segment on domestic violence, will be held on October 26"' for shelter residents. CITY OF RENTON • 01 ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES o� MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 2004 TO: Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: Alex Pietsch (x 6592) SW 415' STREET Since the prospect of renaming SW 4 1 " Street as SW IKEA Way was first brought to you in June, staff has spent considerable time and energy working to communicate the reasons behind and the impacts of this change to the affected businesses in the area. We believed this action would appropriately acknowledge the contributions of IKEA to this community and, frankly, make it difficult for the company to consider alternative locations should the notion arise in the future. As you know, several businesses have since come forward outlining additional financial impacts of the decision. I have become convinced that these newly presented impacts are real and significant for these small businesses. Today, I received a letter from IKEA co-owner Anders Berglund regretfully requesting that the Council reconsider its decision. A copy of the letter is attached. Over the past week, staff and I have been working to find a solution to this situation. Therefore, I propose the City Council consider the following package of actions that will achieve our goal of showing IKEA our appreciation for its contributions to the community on the occasion of its 1 6 h Anniversary celebration. • Proclaim the week of October 17-23, 2004, as IKEA Week in the City of Renton. • Install decorative banners that would be hung on city -owned lampposts honoring IKEA for "keeping Renton ahead of the curve." Lodging tax proceeds would be used to pay for this as IKEA brings hundreds of thousands of people from all over the Pacific Northwest to the store each year, many of whom utilize the local hotels, eat in our restaurants, and enjoy the many wonderful things Renton has to offer. • Participate in the 10`h Anniversary festivities at IKEA on October 23, 2004, and present IKEA's owners Bjorn Bayley and Anders Berglund with the "Key to the City" in honor of their significant contributions to the community. Memo to Council re: SW 41" Street 10/4/2004 Page 2 • Designate the area bordered by SW 43id and SW 41" and East Valley Highway and Oakesdale Avenue as the IKEA Commercial District and provide signage to that effect on city -owned lampposts at entrance points to the district. This designation would have no impact on local businesses other than providing a reference point that they could choose to use or ignore at their discretion. • Continue to work with the Washington State Department of Transportation to provide highway signage on SR 167. • Rescind City Council action renaming SW IKEA Way. Based on your direction tonight, I will bring forward the necessary legislation for these actions at your October 11, 2004, meeting. While I am disappointed with all the negative publicity surrounding this issue, I hope the proposed package meets the needs of the Council in honoring a business that has made such noteworthy contributions to the Renton Community. Attachment cc: Jay Covington Dept. Heads E- October 4, 2004 The Honorable Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor of the City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Kathy, Bjorn and I are both flattered that the City Council would take such a bold step to honor our contributions to the community by renaming SW 41t Street to SW IKEA Way. Despite our large sign, our customers continue to tell us that they have a hard time finding our store. Thousands of people from all over the Pacific Northwest visit IKEA each day. Additional signage along SR 167 would help these people find us. However, the events of the past few weeks have put us in a challenging position. Bjorn and I were not prepared for the outcry from our neighbors. We believed that the renaming would be a benefit to the other businesses along this street. Many of them use our store as a landmark and the additional signage would allow their customers to more easily access their businesses. Now, as you know, several businesses have come forward and outlined significant costs associated with the street naming change. It was never our intent to put such a burden on our neighbors and we believe that this burden outweighs the potential benefit of the street name change. Therefore, Bjorn and I respectfully request that you ask the City Council to reconsider its generous gesture. IKEA and Renton have had a great partnership for ten years. Our commitment to the community is stronger than ever. IKEA believes that contributing to the community makes good sense for our company and our employees and we will continue to be an active participant in everything that makes Renton the wonderful community it is. We look forward to continuing our successful partnership with you and the great City of Renton. Sincerely, Elmhult Limited Partnership By Baylund Inc. Its General Partt� Berglund Elmhult Ltd. Partnership General Partner Baylund, Inc. IKEA Seattle 600 S.W. 43rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Off: 425/656-2980 FAY- 421,/61;6-R10/L David Rynning 14619-SE 116" Street, Renton, WA 98059 Phone: 425-430-1374 e-mail to: verticalranch@yahoo.com CITY OF REN T ON October 4, 2004 OCT 0 5 9004 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Don Erickson City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 425-430-6581 derickson@ci.renton.wa.us Subject: East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area Dear Mr. Erickson, As a matter of public record, we respectfully request that our property be annexed into the City of Renton along with the balance of SE 116th Street east to 148thAve SE. Our property includes the house and three tax parcels associated with 14619-SE 116th Street, and is approximately 2-1/4 acres. Our west property line is on the east demarcation of the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation. Annexing the remaining neighborhood along SE 116th Street east to 148th Ave SE would complete the utility grid and add revenue to the city's tax base. We thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, David Rynning 14619-SE 116th Renton, WA 98059 425-430-1374 verticalranch@yahoo.com 162 3oS 61WI to2305g3S6 cc: Rebecca Lind a I fl c3 C? ❑ 0 �❑, o� G' i:D G� 0tq� 1 lII 13 ❑ C3d ri �a o G7 � r, C� ao' � ❑ �t❑ d❑ -+r_� p o d ■ Q° ❑ El a 1� h 9 0 0 13 13 Q d ❑ {� cp o d aQ O rLI 1J p ❑ o � p � p a � �° 0 g °e o as 0 a ED o Q 0 0 ° � ao � a This dowment is a aphic re�resentatlon, not guoronteed O to survey oeturacy, fntendad (or city purposes only and a bosed on the best hformation ow0oble as of fhe dote shown. This mop Is for display purposes only. Wedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 800 Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 4800 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning <'� Existing Structure +•i Alex Pietsch, Administrator — — Renton City Limits G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. 24 September 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. 0 Proposed Annexation Area Wedgewood Lane Annexation o goo 1600 Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1 : 9600 r✓ti�Y �� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — Renton City Limits Alex Pietsch, Administrator Proposed Annexation Area G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. 24 September 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: `BMITTiNG DATA: Jept/Div/Board Community Services Department Staff Contact Dennis Culp x 6606 SUBJECT: Construction Contract Acceptance; Henry Moses Aquatic Center Powell Construction Co; CAG-03-029 EXHIBITS: Issue Paper — Completion of the Aquatic Center Certificate of Substantial Completion Notice of Completion of Construction Letter from North West Architectural Company FOR AGENDA OF: 10/4/04 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ...................... Public Hearing ........... Correspondence ......... Ordinance ................... Resolution .................. Old Business .............. New Business ............ Study Session ............. Information ................ Other.......................... RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approvals Council Concur Legal Dept ........ x Finance Dept .... x Other. .. EISCAL IMPACT: Project Expenditure Required $4,998,171.28 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted ...... $5,000,000.00 Revenue Generated SUMMARY OF ACTION: Powell Construction Company has substantially completed the Henry Moses Aquatic Center, located in the Cedar River Park. The work has been accomplished in accordance with contract plans and specifications. Although the project has been substantially complete since May 14, 2004, the project closeout was delayed pending receipt of final billings. Four warranty items (mentioned in the letter from North West Architectural Company) will be fixed now that the pool is closed for the season. The payment to Larson Archaeological Services for work the State required us to do is not in the project expenses and will be paid out of interest earned on the $5,000,000 appropriated. The project is under budget by $1,828.72. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the completed project and start of the 60-day lien period. After the 60-day period the retained amount of $203,585.00 will be released upon verification that all taxes have been paid and -11 liens resolved. cAfilesWe \Agenda Bill - Powell Final.doc CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Renton City Councilmembers 1 VIA: ��4!�Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator SUBJECT: Completion of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center ISSUE: Should the City Council accept the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Project as substantially complete and authorize the start of the 60-day lien period? RECOMMENDATION: That the Council concur in the acceptance of the completed project and the start of the 60- day lien period. After the 60-day period the retained amount of $203,585.00 will be released upon verification that all taxes have been paid and all liens resolved. BACKGROUND: • The Henry Moses Aquatic Center Construction Project was started on April 25, 2003 and was substantially complete on May 14, 2004. • The Contractor completed the work in accordance with the plans and specifications, according to both the City Inspectors and the Architect's construction supervision reports. • There were no punch list items remaining upon project completion; however, three warranty items were identified, see attached letter from North West Architectural Company. These items were purposely postponed in order to minimize interference with the pool season. The following items are currently being addressed: ➢ Fix the floor drains in the restrooms ➢ Complete the UL ratings ➢ Insure proper operation of the boilers. • The original construction contract amount was $4,105,877 and the final contract amount was $4,430,010. • The 43 Change Orders total $324,133, which represents 7.89% worth of change orders from the original construction amount. Of these change orders, 42% were City requested changes. City requested changes included the addition of a bid alternate to add the second slide ($92,956) and the addition of a bid alternate for spray arches ($7,808). • The State required investigation of the archeologically significant piece of charcoal found on -site (the size of a baseball). The cost to the City was $24,654.21 to mitigate the discovery. This payment was made from the interest earned on the appropriated funds and was not charged against the project budget. Interest on the appropriation during the life of the project totaled at least $80,000. • The project is under the appropriated amount of $5,000,000 by $1,828. • See the attached spreadsheet for project cost summary and change order details. CONCLUSION: The project was built according to the final plans and specifications. The work has been inspected and complies with City Code. Attachment C: Jay Covington Dennis Culp PROJECT: Henry Moses Aquatic Center PROJECT NO.: CAG - 03-029 DATE: October 4, 2004 Project Features Unit Bathhouse/Mech. Storage/Concession 7,500 sq. ft. Leisure Pool / Lazy River 9,000 sq. ft. Lap Pool (25 yards / 6 lanes) 3,300 sq. ft. Aquatics Amenities Water Slides Feature Spray Nozzles Spray Arches Spray Cieysers Underwater Social Bench Water Play (.iround Wave Machine Interactive Play Structure Sitework 65,340 sq. ft. NOTE: Furnishings, and vendor supplied concessions equipment purchased from operating funds. Final Project Expenses Consultants to the City Art Design Expenses Permitting Security Systems Information Systems Builder's risk insurance extension Construction Cost $4,105,877 Change Orders $324,133 Construction Total $4,430,010 $47,288 $12,374 426,074 41,414 20,000 20,000 1,012 Project Total $4,998,172 Savings $1,828 CHANGE ORDER LOG Henry Moses Aquatic Center CONTRACTOR: Architect CAG-03-029 Powell Construction North West Architectural Company ORIGINATION CLASSIFICATION KEY: (A) design clarification, (B) owner request/action, (C) agency or code requirement, (D) latent unforeseen conditions, (E) Error, (N) Negative, (0) Omission, (V) Value Engineering ORIGIN NET TIME C.O. DESCRIPTION KEY CHANGE EXTEN NO. Revise handrails and fence at pool C 3,826 0 1 Sanitary sewer at SE site D 10,823 0 2 Poor soils at activity pool D 947 0 2 Add skimmers C 1,911 0 1 Delete wells and pool gravel D -4,483 0 3 Add fan, water, drain at concess. B 6,487 0 4 Revisions at activity pool A 2,237 0 16 Change aluminum gate to metal A -1,280 0 5 Revise footing elevations E 3,276 0 8 Revise storm line at maint. Yard E 1,003 0 8 Add key and dowels at pool A 3,349 0 6 Revise utility conection locations C 2,076 0 10 Revise handicap parking stalls A 4,072 0 6 Revise feature wall heights E 578 0 8 Add vents to sink islands O 1,138 0 9 Add rigid insulation B 673 0 7 Add exit sign at main gates C 1,616 0 10 Add slide (alt. 2) B 92,956 0 11 Revise motor at slide to 40 HP B 954 0 11 Add doors at plumbing chases O 1,977 0 9 Revise entry gates C 5,359 0 14 Add spray arches (alt. 7) B 7,808 0 30 Revise slide footings D 1,844 0 15 Add side sewer cleanouts C 3,415 0 14 Revise fan switching per RFI41 A 1,174 0 12 Add wave quells A 9,774 0 12 Add data/tele outlets at concessions B 183 0 13 Revise locker manufacturer A 0 0 16 Revise fencing and gates C 16,880 0 17 Add one pool lighting J-box/conduit A 1,040 0 29 Additional site stripping D 4,918 0 15 Delete 3 bollards B 438 0 13 Add angle at east wall changing A 4,222 0 16 Add one outdoor shower A 3,335 0 19 Add umbrella sleeves B 1,681 0 20 Additional trenching reductions C -2,000 0 21 Add power to shower transformers O 1,826 0 19 Add mow strip B 5,282 0 18 Additional asphalt paving C 111696 0 21 Revise fence location B 671 0 20 Change roofing at concessions A 5,239 0 24 Change toilet accessories A 700 0 19 Closure plates at top of walls A 6,158 0 39 Add water stop at cold joint A 1,132 0 23 Add louvers at plant room A 1,943 0 23 Change duplex boxes to 4-plex B 118 0 28 Overtime for concrete on 11/22 B 1,348 0 22 Delete lights at slide tower A -300 0 39 Add Water sensor at wave sump B 0 --- --- Add PRBA at water service C 454 0 25 Add backflow preventer at pool O 2,598 0 26 Add plugs at sewer cleanouts C 0 0 27 (A) design clarification, (B) owner request/action, (C) agency or code requirement, (D) latent unforeseen conditions, (E) Error, (N) Negative, (0) Omission, (V) Value Engineering ORIGIN NET TIME C.O. DESCRIPTION KEY CHANGE EXTEN NO. Expand mow strip at fence B 2,396 0 41 Regrade at slide deck B 2,181 0 31 Additional topsoil B 1,986 0 28 Repair street curb and gutter B 995 0 41 Change downspouts to PVC A -1,200 0 39 Add flashing south wall concession O 442 0 32 Revisions to CP-01 Railings A 6,010 0 29 Additional circuits to chlorine equip. O 2,554 0 34 Delete blinds B -435 0 30 Change drain connection at shower C 430 0 33 Change two pumps E 0 0 34 Add stripe at wave pool B 3,301 0 35 Additional control at boiler O 1,256 0 34 Revise emergency controls O 7,353 0 42 Additional circuit to UV control E 2,012 0 34 Revise gas piping at boiler A 882 0 37 Modify railing at plant room roof C 5,018 .0 38 Revise power at concessions HW A 2,265 0 37 Add slats on west fence C 4,244 0 38 Add louvers at boiler room doors A 956 0 37 Cane bolts at gates/entry mullions C 956 0 40 Sheet metal plumbing chase covers A 1,415 0 39 Additional low voltage at plant room A 2,420 0 39 Paint curb at entry C 206 0 40 Add bypass at spray ground O 887 0 42 Additional surveying C 2,550 0 40 Extend concrete deck at slides B 682 0 41 Additional 16 LF railing C 1,509 0 40 Change railings to galvanized A 1,226 0 39 Chenge louver at boiler room E 747 0 43 Non-compensable time extension ---- ---- 66 36 UL Testing of equipment C 2,594 0 Total Change orders $297,916 Without WSST $324,133 With WSST , AIA Document G704 - 2000 Certificate of Substantial Completion PROJECT: (Name and address): Henry Moses Aquatic Center 1719 Maple Valley Hwy Renton, WA 98055 TO OWNER: (Name and address): Gity.:of Renton 1055 South.Grady Way Renton, WA,98055 PROJECT NUMBER: 2-02072/ CONTRACT FOR: General Construction CONTRACT DATE: April 29, 2003 TO CONTRACTOR: (Name and address): Powell Construction 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER PROJECT OR PORTION OF THE PROJECT DESIGNATED FOR PARTIAL OCCUPANCY OR USE SHALL INCLUDE: Entire Work The Work performed under this Contract has been reviewed and found, to the Architect's best knowledge, information and belief, to be substantially completeo Substantial Completion is the stage in the progress of the Work when the Work or designated portion is sufficiently complete in accordance with the Contract Documents so that the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work for its!intended use. The date of Substantial Completion of the Project or portion designated above is the date of issuance established by this Certificate; which :is; also the date of commencement of applicable warranties required by the Contract Documents, except as ,stated tielow:- Warranty:: Date of Commencement i Northwest Architetural Company 57/141 04 ARCHITECT:. BY DATE OF ISSUANCE A!ltst of items :6' be completed or corrected is attached hereto. The failure to include any items on such list does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor:, to complete all Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing; the date of.commencement of warranties for items on the attached list will be the date of issuance of the final Certificate of Payment orthe date of final payment. :Cost estimatopt Work that Ts incomplete or defective: $ 0.00 The Contractor will complete or correct the Work on the list of items attached hereto within Zero ( 0 ) days from the above date of:Substantial Completion. Powell. Construction CONTRACTOR" B DATE The Owner accepts the Work or designated portion as b' /Ily complete and will assume full possession at Noon (time) on May 14, 2004 (date). j City of Renton l . OWNER BY ' y" DATE—,! AIA Document G704TM — 2000. Copyright 01963, 1980, 1992 and 2000 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING, This A10 Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIAe Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:46:21 on 05/1312004 under Order No.1000104054_1 which expires on 3!7/2005, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1692179172) The responsibilities of the Owner and Contractor for security, maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance shall be as follows: (Note: Owner's and Contractor's legal and insurance counsel should determine and review insurance requirements and coverage.) Owner to rekey locks AIA Document G704TM — 2000. Copyright ©1963, 1980, 1992 and 2000 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This Al a Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or 2 any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:46:21 on 05/13/2004 under Order No.1000104054_1 which expires on 3/7/2005, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1692179172) STATT o� State of Washington o Department of Revenue 9 4 x Audit Procedures & Administration PO Box 47474 Olympia, Washington 98504-7474 Reg.No.: Date: October 4, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: _ DEP TMENT_'USE,.ONLY' City of Renton Assigned To Tracy Schuld 1055 South Grady Way Date Assigned Renton, WA 98055 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract Construction of Henry Moses Aquatic Center Contractor's Name Powell Construction Company Telephone No. 425-828-4774 Contractor's Address P.O. Box 97070, Kirkland, WA 98083-9770 Date Work Commenced May 2003 Date Work Completed May 14, 2004 Date Work Accepted May 14, 2004 Surety or Bonding Co. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America Bond # 103975700 Agent's Address Hartford Plaza, Tower 4, Hartford, CT 06183-90692 Contract Amount: Additions or Reductions: Sales Tax: Total $3,773,784.00 $297,916.00 $358,309.60 $4,430,009.60 am Amount Disbursed: $4,226,424.60 Amount Retained: $203,585.00 Total: $4,430,009.60 (Disbursing Officer) Phone No: 425-430-6918 The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 310020 (12-92) DC:CTY31 0020 11 /99 bh August 10, 2004 Dennis Culp, Director Community Services Director Renton City Hall - 5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Aquatics Center - Final Acceptance 2-02072 - 413b Dear Dennis: To the best of my knowledge, all punchlist items have been completed on this project. have attached a letter from Powell Construction listing several items that will be repaired or completed after the Aquatic Center closes in September. We couldn't have had a better summer to open a new aquatic facility. With the low number of problems, and a commitment from Powell to address warranty issues in a timely manner, I recommend the City of Renton accept the Henry Moses Aquatic Center as 100 percent complete. I have enclosed a retainage release application for payment. I recommend release of retainage as soon as all liens have been released and the appropriate State mandated waiting period expires. This has been one of the most exciting projects I have ever worked on. Sincerely, Steven M. Shiver, AIA Associate Principal N:\2-02072\3\A\3Aa-Final-Accept-040810. doc E Bruce E Blackmer, AIA Dole S Brookie, AIA Keith M. Comes. AIA Colin R. Jones. AIA A. Fred King, AIA Steven J. McNutt, AIA R. G. Nelson. AIA Guy J. Overman, AIA William M. Podobnik. AIA Richard A. Sologgo, AIA Gregory J. Stock_ AIA Bruce B. Turner PE Kevin P Flan000n, AIA Mark J. Gifford, AIA Thomas E. Golden, AIA Dona L. Harbough. AIA Brent G. Hording, AIA Douglas G. Heyomoto, AIA Malcolm R. Jollie, AIA Michael R. O'Molley. AIA William W. Rash, AIA Offices in Seattle, Spokane. and Coeur d'Alene 2201 Sixth Avenue Suite 1405 Seattle, Washington 98121-1832 TEL 206-441-4522 FAX 206-441-7917 noc'!'nwarchco.com www.nworchco.com August 6, 2004 Mr. Steve Shiver Northwest Architectural Company 2201 Sixth Avenue Suite 1405 Seattle, WA 98121 RE: Renton Aquatic Center Final Acceptance Dear Steve, We are at the end! The pool has just about completed its first season with very few minor problems, what a great project thanks to a lot of hard work from you and all involved. As you know we have processed all of the last change orders, enclosed please find the final 100% complete pay application and the application for retainage. Powell Construction will be on site after the center closes for the season to address the following punchiest issues. l . Address the floor drain issues in the main restrooms and family restrooms; I believe that a meeting on site to disuses the options will be required. 2. Complete the UL rating inspections, 90% of the work has been done but we need to get the UL inspector to approve the work and then of course have the City Inspector approve. 3. Complete the final inspection and receive a final Certificate of Occupancy. 4. We will continue to work with the boiler manufacture and the engineer to assure proper operation. If there is any other concerns please let me know, this has been a great project for all involved and is our intention to finish with the same effort we have put forth from the beginning. Sincerely Michael Brehm Vice President Powell Construction Powell Construction Company 425-828-4774 '425-822-8297 P.O. Box 97070, Kirkland, WA 98083-9770 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI k: ,C" Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: October 04, 2004 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plat. Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Administrative Report & Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other.... .... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated for additional right-of-way is a 15-foot corner radius (approx. 28.0 sq.ft.) at the corner of Blaine Ave NE and NE 201h Street. The requirement of this dedication is to insure proper turning radius at street corners for emergency vehicles. The dedication is a City of Renton code requirement of the MoJo Short Plat, LUA04-054, and Council acceptance of said right-of- way should be completed prior to recording deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2004\MOJOSHPL 03m AGNBILL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 3 311390 --i 262-M Project File #: L(4 A-��f,_�5�/. S/-/IPL - /4 Street Intersection: !vim 26f 45 % *P- BLAW-CAG&EF A -i- Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Z— Grantor(s): Grantee(s): I -A41C /gELz VAnl`ss,g 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abhreviwed orJuh le( musl ,fie here. Additional legal on pale ) pe,Yzi-/cAj e.p LOT 4, AA m a cyL i c1,5 e�Wvi p. i P1AT z4 - 7t3 The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted BY: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk IlvntlrnU.4L FQ4.�� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS :9CKNO1-1�1 °�a4 COUNTY OF KING ) • �Pttt I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Nosy Ski 96;0&•°*A M 1c}ffL P c�1,Cv PrND �, ' signed this instrument and i 4j l�< acknowledged it to be his/her eu ee and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ` mentioned in the instrument. 'Jn ,� . ?' �y O S'N�w--� 1� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) PAUL1 t, Ee M . WERER— My appointment expires: 6- J S -05 Dated: 9 -16 - p4 Hforms/xxcFRM/AGREE/DEED\ PC Page 1 FORM 04 0001 /bh EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND THAT IS PART OF LOT "A OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 19-45, (MADELINE SLAV►CK SHORT PLAT), RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7907109001, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID TRACT OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT "A", THENCE S 890 20, 02" W ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT "A", 14.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS N 00° 39' 58" W 15.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 880 49' 11 " FOR 23.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT "'A"- THENCE S 00* 30' 51 " W ALONG SAID EAST BOUNDARY 14.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. �9� m .' 4J Z " Act F • D 88.49.11 R 15.00 Lai ' L 23.25 Z �Q RIW J _ _ SE com*r N 89°20'02" E of Loft "A I C13 Area to be dedicated to the My of Renton 1 "=30' CI _King County Recording No. NE 20TH STREET Prepared for Michael & Vanessa Pacheco MICHAEL MOWRER & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES 17424 Mallard Cove Lane, Mount Vernon, Wa. 96274 (360) 422-6097 D4 - 5 T23N M IIN ................. . ..... ct NZ w 1/2 'on' E; Jones ve R-8(P) ................ .4 .. .... ... .......... .......... ... ....... . . c-+.- '21 CC) �1,1..... 1* -11 ... .... ... I ("aV-,! + L REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works 8c DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST. REPORT DATE: July 9, 2004 Project Name Mojo Short Plat Owner/Applicant Michael and Vanessa Pacheco 3800 NE 4 th Street Renton, WA 98056 Contact James Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mount Vernon, WA 98274 File Number LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Project Manager Nancy Weil Project Description Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for a two -lot subdivision of a 0.36-acre site located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Unit Per Acre (R-8) Zone. The subject site is currently developed with an existing single-family structure, which is proposed to remain on what would become new Lot 1. Lot 2 is intended for the future construction of single-family residence. Both proposed lots have public right of way frontage, Lot 1 on NE 201h Street and Lot 2 on Blaine Avenue NE. Project Location 2200 NE 201h Street u C �" ` e • 94TH _ ST. F es. 1y ~ 2 A a�.�'� a Project Location Map snplrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 2 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owners of Record: Michael and Vanessa Pacheco 3800 NE 41h Street Renton, WA 98056 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) 3.Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: The site is currently developed with an existing 2,140 square foot single-family residence proposed to remain on what would become new Lot 1. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) East: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) West: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) 6.Access: Lot 1 would have direct access from NE 20th Street. and Lot 2 would have direct access from Blaine Avenue NE. 7. Site Area: 15,498 square feet / 0.36 acre C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 6/7/1993 Annexation N/A 1827 5/3/1960 Madeline Slavick Short Plat SP 245-78 N/A 7/23/1978 Board of Public Works PRE-APP 04-030 N/A 5/26/2004 Deferral D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water: There is an existing 6-inch diameter water main in both NE 201h Street and Blaine Avenue NE. Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer main in NE 201h Street and Blaine Avenue NE. Surface Water/Storm Water: There are existing storm facilities in NE 20th Street just west of the site. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 3 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family 2. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Proiect Description/Background The applicants, Michael and Vanessa Pacheco, have proposed to subdivide a 0.36-acre parcel into two lots. The property is currently developed with an approximately 2,140 square foot single-family residential structure, which is proposed to remain on what would become new Lot 1. A portion of the existing attached deck is proposed to be removed as part of the short plat approval. The removal of part of the deck is necessary, as it would not meet required rear yard setback to the proposed new property line. The lots are proposed at the following sizes: 10,030 square feet (Lot 1) and 5,468 square feet (Lot 2). The subject property is on the corner of NE 20th Street and Blaine Avenue NE. Currently, Blaine Avenue NE is an unimproved City cul de sac street, 25-feet wide and 270-feet long. As there are no environmentally critical areas, right-of-way or private easements serving more than 3 lots to be dedicated, the net site area of the property is the same as the gross square footage (15,498 square feet or 0.36 acres) of the site. This in turn, equates to a net density of 5.6 dwelling units per acre (2 / 0.36 = 5.6 du/ac), which is under the maximum (9.7) allowed for properties one-half an acre or less in size within the R-8 zone. The topography of the subject site slopes approximately 12% from the southeast property line to the northwest property line. The subject site is developed with one single-family dwelling and coniferous trees. No critical areas were found on the subject site during the review of this application. The proposal to divide the parcel into two lots requires an administrative short plat review. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or critical areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions Not applicable 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single-family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of new single-family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies: Policy LU-34. Net development densities should fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The net density of the proposed subdivision is 5.6 dwelling units per acre, which is within the density range prescribed. shpltrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 4 Policy LU-35. A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single-family residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project reviei, The applicant has proposed a two -lot subdivision. Lot 1 is 10,030 square feet; Lot 2 is 5,468 square feet. Both of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirements. Policy LU-36. Allow development at 9.7 dwelling units per acre on infill parcels of one acre or less as an incentive to encourage single-family small lot development on 4,500 sq. ft. lots. The applicant has proposed Lot 1 to be 10,030 square feet which may allow further division. Lot 2 is proposed at 5,468 square feet. The proposed density for the two lots is 5.6 du/acre, all of which complies with this policy. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would divide the property into two lots retaining the existing single-family structure and allow for the future construction of one new single-family dwelling. The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way, and private easements serving 3 lots or more from the gross acreage of the site. The property does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas nor areas required for private drives serving more than three lots. Therefore, the gross and net property area (15,498 square feet or 0.36 acres) are the same. This in turn, equates to a net density of 5.6 dwelling units per acre (2 / 0.36 = 5.6 du/ac), which is within the allowed density range of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The short plat would create two lots, proposed Lot 1 would be a corner lot with 10,030 square feet and Lot 2 would be ar interior lot with 5,468 square feet in size. The proposed lot sizes are compatible with other existin lots in this area under the same R-8 zoning classification. The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and, lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed to have up to 50% lot coverage. Lot 1, with the existing 2,140 square foot residential structure, would have lot coverage of approximately 21 % (2,140/10,030 = 0.21) after the short plat, which is within the allowed range. The proposed lots also comply with the R-8 requirements for minimum lot width (60 feet for corner lots and 50 feet for interior lots) as well as minimum lot depth (65 feet). Lot 1 is a corner lot and exceeds the requirements with 101.28 lot width and average depth of 99.1 feet. Lot 2 is an interior lot with 54 feet width and 101.26 feet depth. Setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard 20 feet, side yard 5 feet, side yard along a street 15 feet, and rear yard 20 feet. Upon recording of the short plat, the existing single-family structure on Lot 1 would need to meet the minimum required setbacks; the proposed plat indicates the structure will comply with all the setbacks once a portion of the rear deck is removed; staff recommends that a condition be placed on the short plat requiring the confirmation that the deck has been modified to meet rear setback prior to final short plat approval. While no construction is planned for Lot 2 at this time, the lot appears to have adequate area for a new single-family residence while meeting the required setbacks and lot coverage. In addition, each lot would have adequate area to provide two off-street parking spaces as required by the parking regulations. c) Community Assets The applicant noted the site is vegetated with grass lawn, ornamental vegetation and coniferous trees. On proposed Lot 2 there are two trees located to the rear of the lot and are not indicated to be removed, however one may be impacted for the placement of the new single-family residence. As a result of the loss of existing vegetation and in keeping with the code, which requires adding attractiveness and value to the property, staff recommends the following condition: the applicant be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 - 8 feet in height (conifer) per each new lot, within the 20-foot front yard setback area. shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 5 In order to ensure the trees are maintained and/or replaced if damaged, the applicant shall be required to record a restrictive covenant against the property. The restrictive covenant shall indicate that two ornamental trees are required to be planted and maintained within the front yard setback area of each new lot. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to or in conjunction with recording of the short plat; however, the trees shall be planted prior to final building permit inspection. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. The Subdivision Regulations require the installation of full street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and half -street pavement along the site's NE 20th Street and Blaine Avenue NE street frontages pursuant to (RMC section 4-6-060), unless waived or deferred through the City of Renton Board of Public Works. On May 26, 2004 the City of Renton Board of Public Works granted a deferral for curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street pavement and stormwater facilities subject to the applicant recording a Restrictive Covenant to participate in any future Local Improvement District (LID). Staff recommends this Restrictive Covenant shall be recorded prior to the recording of the short plat, or within two (2) years from the Board's decision, whichever comes first. The proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The additional lot is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips per new lot (credit was given for the existing single family residence). The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 = $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The proposed division would create two lots with property lines at right angles to street lines and having public street frontage, as discussed above under subsection (b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation. As Lot 1 is a corner lot at intersection of dedicated public right-of- way, except alleys, a 15-foot minimum radius is required. Staff recommends that a condition be placed on the short plat requiring the applicant to dedicate a 15-foot minimum radius at the intersection of NE 20th Street and Blaine Avenue NE prior to the recording of the short plat. The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot would have the following access. • Lot 1 direct street access from NE 20th Street and, • Lot 2 direct street access from Blaine Avenue NE; Topography: The topography of the site gently slopes downwardly from southeast to northwest, at an average slope of approximately 12%. The property is vegetated with grass lawn, ornamental vegetation and coniferous trees. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8) on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. 0 Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the applicant providing the Code required improvements and mitigation fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot with credit given for the existing single-family residence, is recommended in order to mitigate shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 6 the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488 x 1 = $488.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed short plat would result in 0.88 (0.44 X 1 = 0.44) new children to the local schools (Kennydale Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School). The Renton School District has indicated they can accommodate the additional student generated by this proposal. Streets: The subject site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of NE 201h Street and Blaine Avenue NE. Neither street frontage is improved with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. A storm drainage facility is located on NE 20`h Street which is an improved surface. Currently, Blaine Avenue NE is unimproved. However, the Board of Public Works granted a deferral on May 26, 2004 to the proposed property for curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street pavement and stormwater facilities provide the applicant agrees to sign and record a Restrictive Covenant to participate in any future Local Improvement District (LID). No additional streets are required as part of this proposal. Nevertheless, the applicant would be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75.00 per each new trip generated by the proposal prior to the recording of the short plat (please see discussion under Streets above). Storm Water. Storm water facilities are located in NE 20th Street. A drainage narrative was submitted with the application and has been reviewed by the City of Renton's Plan Review Section. An engineered design will be required to be submitted (prior to recording) for the storm water drainage from the new dwelling. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $715.00 per new single-family lot would be collected as part of the construction permit or prior to the recording of the short plat. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: There is an existing 6-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer main located in NE 20`h Street and Blaine Avenue NE. The applicant would be required to make a" other necessary connections to serve future development on Lot 2. The site is within the We: Kennydale Special Assessment District therefore is required additional sanitary sewer fee based on a rate of $1,050 per new lot. A Water System Development Charge of $1,525 per new single- family lot, as well as a Sewer System Development Charge of $900.00 per new single-family lot. These fees would be collected as part of the construction permit or prior to the recording of the short plat. H. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Mojo Short Plat, File No. LUA-04-054, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Single Family Residential (SFR) land use designation. 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Single Family - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations for the short platting of two lots provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family (zoned R- 8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 7 7. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge of $1,525.00, a Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge of $900.00, and a Surface Water Development Charge of $715.00 will be assessed for the additional lot. The West Kennydale Special Assessment District Charge of $1,050.00 per new lot. These fees will be payable prior to issuance of the utility construction permit or prior to the recording of the short plat. 8. Board of Public Works: An off -site deferral was granted by the Board of Public Works on May 26, 2004 for curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street pavement and stormwater facilities for NE 201h Street and Blaine Avenue NE on the subject site with a condition the applicant record a Restrictive Covenant to participate in any future Local Improvement Districts (LID). I. CONCLUSIONS: The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. J. DECISION: The Mojo Short Plat, File No. LUA-04-054, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to demolish or remove that portion of the attached deck which will achieve compliance with the rear yard setback located on proposed Lot 1. The satisfaction of the completion of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division at the time of the final inspection of the demolition permit. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant that two ornamental trees are required to be planted and maintained within the front yard setback area of each new lot. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to or in conjunction with recording of the short plat; however, the trees shall be planted prior to final building permit inspection. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The applicant shall be required to record Restrictive Covenant to participate in any future Local Improvement District (LID) or other City initiated projects to provide improvements which were deferred by the Board of Public Works on May 26, 2004. The covenant shall be recorded prior to recording the short plat, or within two (2) years from the Board's decision, whichever comes first. 4. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project (estimated at $717.75). The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 5. The applicant shall dedicate a 15-foot minimum radius at the intersection of NE 20th Street and Blaine Avenue NE to be shown on the face of the plat prior to the recording of the short plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single-family lot estimated at $488.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: A July 9, 2004 Gregg A. i me n, P/B/PW Administrator d cisi n date shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED July 9, 2004; LUA-04-054, SHPL-A Page 8 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions Planninq 1. Work hours for new single-family developments are limited to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. Nor is work permitted on Sundays. 2. Applicant shall be required to have planted a minimum of two trees in the required front yard for the new residential lot. Review and approval of this requirement shall be at the review of the building permit and prior to its issuance. 3. The applicant shall be required to demolish or remove that portion of the attached deck which will achieve compliance with the rear yard setback located on proposed Lot 1. The satisfaction of the completion of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division at the time of the final inspection of the demolition permit. Fire Prevention 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. A Fire Mitigation Fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. Plan Review — Drainage 1. The Surface Water System Development Charges of $715.00 per each new lot applies to this project. This is payable with the construction permit and prior to recording of the short plat. 2. A temporary erosion control plan shall be required; erosion control measures shall comply with the Depart of Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Management Manual and be to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Plan Review — Sewer 1. The System Development Charge for sewer is $900.00. This is payable with the construction permit and prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. Separate side sewer stubs shall be required for each lot prior to the recording of the short plat. Side sewer shall be a minimum 2% slope. Dual side sewers are not allowed. 3. West Kennydale Special Assessment District is based on a rate of $1,050 per new lot. This is payable prior to issuance of utility construction permit. Plan Review —Water 1. The System Development Charge for water is $ 1,525.00. This is payable with the construction permit and prior to recording of the short plat. 2. Fire flow requirement for single-family residences under 3,600 square feet including attached garage is 1,000 gpm. One hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structures. 3. Applicant shall install a 5-inch quick -connect fitting on existing hydrant. 4. Water service will be required to be provided to each new lot prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review — Street Improvements 1. The Board of Public Works has deferred full street improvements including sidewalk, curb and gutter, street pavement and stormwater facilities. The applicant shall be required to sign and record a Restrictive Covenant to participate in any future Local Improvement District. 2. Applicant shall be required to comply with the City of Renton's Trench Restoration and Street Overlay Requirements where applicable. 3. A traffic control plan shall be required for construction impacting the City's right of way. 4. Maximum driveway slope permitted is 15 %. Plan Review — General 1. All utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities, where applicable. 3. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed which are greater than 4 feet in height shall be required a separate building permit for structural review and require a geotechnical report. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground for the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Property Services -Comments for Final Short Plat Submittal 1. Please see attached memo from Property Services dated June 17, 2004. shpltrpt. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department REPORT AND DECISION DATED Jul TRANSMITTED this July 9, 2004 t Michael and Vanessa Pacheco 3800 NE 4`h Street Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this July 9, 2004 t John Rutland James Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mount Vernon, WA 98274 TRANSMITTED this July 9, 2004 t, Tien Peng 2012 Blaine Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Mike Kellar 2014 Aberdeen Place NE Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this July 9, 2004 tc Larry Meckling, Building Official Stan Englar, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Dire Jennifer Henning Kayren Kittrick Jan Conklin Carrie Olson -Davis Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075 (3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on July 23, 2004. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. shpltrpt.doc 1 1 rW 1V J N Mr I3S I /v tMON7 s N N"= � II I I 1 • O 1 N N N Y• i 1FS PIE cm 270 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 L.Jr" _ 1 I 1 �fee i1 .� -rra -•1 'j -f 1 � • � • r[--� � I _ � 1 i l •o / ail '•'���, i;, , ,... 1 , t ,:tls ' SAVE. ss ' ao ABERDEEN • i. s s �_ N d17. S, N 1 N 1 ►" `" � w •n I °° 1 0 Ke oe � ;� I N 1 ., I 1 "r -•.1 � � . •/ • � s fly .L�'� � 1 I = r. NI ; i., i --,-2_a-_� Z�' �= BERDEEN PL do N._E. , a NK. ^1 �NI_-..-1 ti 1 1 1\ .,., - •1 �-{ Q i - , S N V •ry` ,v N w ,d OI'M �' 1 1 1 - 1n � �r• . nw� / � — Jd � �j��, ; ; i zl r W N — T —T E S �rR� le w "� 123E4 i AoQG , f 1r1 �1 1 N 40 u 1 ' ' Mal 1 J 1 � � v , 1 I � LW! _ �A , S .n dt 1 , c_ca —�J�.• BLA/NE AVE WE. ' 1- p�(��1�;�;�1�'�iTi O Y ` +� 1 1 ► I 1 1 t i c' Co 1, i 1 x rr �eeQM a ri y32 zoo `A i� � � � tlob e e A r►� ' CAMAS ' _ �. AVE: ND � J � . v— ��s • a A VE. N.E o >, a `� too �_ ioz ' Faso �° es ss tz it r A to-- (D V) O V) N N (0 C (0 n _-_ RECORMW W. VOl/pAGt ITON CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ACTION NO. LUA— ___-- SHPL—A CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NO. LND— --- -- IN THE SE 114 OF NE 114, SEC 5, TWP 23 N., RNG. 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY aFbETw It $0 rebar/eop "Nown/--2t,520" F.wrd as Hoed fmo f FoOnd 14 r , LS 114491 C.D. DtLLA[iNS LAAS .'.rSAlNC70N (12 f•) offset fm. gaptal pmwfy On. aAAMAl or ZAF.V DiV. A'0. 4 GST,rh Offset to faw prop" NM WL. 11, PUTS. /C. B7. S u owre.ad ummy fin" 3a c x Eyi.RnO Rau over 6" dfom.W. (CNr/.rwn) mw .f RaY Lef.R, J, l 1I sNa.t root 1:.s-PA L"< FIN Nyd anffhf0 V 1 J • • •' PariToa .f .bTeak fa be re-0 0.1 g Mann o 20, sWbwb f. mw Frap.rtr An.. N W s rw• 29' 09" E fosse 0JJ A— •,_3O� xi O SS „ ZN I ' w6D79 ZS'n € f, W-De/ y S $ Sw.q Nal- eM P—af .. I w n irfrf Ma Nnq we p NM 0 by dNiff I N. a/ ii f0,0e0 Y 0 -- �. µ/" L E m11MWT I.aaMld .fNYay Orwraw —Off mb w .0am Mbt .kllal aM NTD6N �N11 p•+ WAd f.To-130-09d. P= " `• O Mr. a ewakpi W.—led %A .I NE SON s-1R..Dr Vwt PW w \\\ foOJO S.F. `w"=, a,.ri $ S—Y wlw.nwa Sladk 0.4 fi f Iru, y}FT9• Vet fp, PO- �. AF I w 7.07fOD00tf M�9r+aarl LL'.'.ebkar•. ee.dN n1 E]ea > i IP AW rIN, YeL rLs A— W. A < orAS— , eifriEl0oo0.�bwf k T�.r.� n tZ ,a p $ue' o LIS J'r s r • n4.oa FM UL W' ', $ _ _ _ c/1 --y.— �—e Fad eom k, .e.. N or ar Os- E 7J13Att (R... d rf ae.) 1d rstzRo (FNN) UWNrd YW N.E. 20TH STREET I fs M 30 0 ,DO w 90 cRAVNic snALE - t�Er - - — RECORDING CERTIFICATE r k'V%' M• YNAr CFA K A PLAY fd D� W off S AOTOAL sLa9cr, frTaor is ASTN4C►ANL AM 14s0) ON A TTl11f m/eOANtaaN nao FOR acm TRLs — DAY OF OF Im RwnaK V"r rM aWAN= OG/ W AND ANN" Mr tftdRN Dmafcsnr rfmRaN. AND tNAr +atrrAlvDR w� anJT sEY w N RNIC(TAEL A/OWRER & A550C/AYES ML AT I __ OOK._,_._ CF &MVINI AT AND IDr eadNeKs.4rArrrs aN nrr eNaDw Aa SNd1M oAr rNr sirrxr MOJO SHORT PLAT J FSA► f>A SN011M fMRtON A77 KN TR[vawAD swaTars ANd/oN iRQFE'SSIONAL SURYEYTNG SERVICES PACE — AT 1IK R[RUO7tT 0/ IIOIIRER f ASSOGARJ. CMW MAR M ACWRnWCE R'TRI 1K FNOY1pgYs L9NYAlrSD /N A ,tom-tJo wt — 7 i12I Afofford Cow Lorar, 4(euNf V.men, Wa. 98274 S.A.- r+..sa• Oboe: ug Jdea Je6 Nat-oroa- uana6[R OF BMW Also �M CINR, SURVEYOR'S CERnnCATF Woh" r. New/.r FL9 M 21,390 (360) <T2-6087 D/vw/r by:m ChkS� by wrre 5f,.e/ t eF7 CITY OF RENTON APPROVAL DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTSD� No vaI/PacE CITY OF RENTON DMWNEO AND APPROVED I= _ DAr or _ . 2GQ_, G(AWINW AM APPROVED TM— DAY OF-- PUBLIC WlIR16 I1i➢[CTOA CfTY DF AEMON - ___- PORTION OFF OU1ftl(ED AND APPROVED iN15 — LMY OF zOD_. ASSESSOR PORTON OF THE SE 114. NE 1/4 Of U01U77 ASSESSOR sm Oa. TWP. 2101. RHC. a E. WAL DECLARATION KNoW ALL MEN BY TIASE P1IFSEM9 THAT DS 7NE uAvounNED BWF67DR Or coMMuWir DEVDOPw ACCOUNT HUL48ER OWNERS 4r TRS LAAO Asww Otd 1 11 OO AWMAT ANAT A "`.f7.00 AND Lr�D",Nrew SNORE ssw"&WDIHW SB. t7.M0 AND OECLA9E 7H/J SliORI PLAT 37/i0TYL90lWI M BE CITY OF RENTON LAND USE NO. LUA— — SHPL—A ME ORAPNIC WKSOTFAM W OF 7NE SAG AAD rWr SWMORT "-- WnHiPwC7LLIDEWIRr wma" ''"°u�°1?0"Di11` WrN rNE DESIRES DF7NE DNN CITY OF ,RENTON LAND RECORD NO, LND— MAYS SCr O&W MOM APO SIA �-' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SURVEY REFERENCES. NkhAM1 POoMao y Coo p�b� LOT A, MAKL Nf SLAVIK SNORT PUT NUMBER 245-78. RECORM UNDER RfCOR"K WASER "OTfO8c01. MAO A PORTION OF 7NE UAW S LG WAS 20-1 VOL 1 OF O. 4J DIY. l,f FOLLOWM MC08W PAOPEM: VOI 11, PLATS, Po. A2 WEST NALP Of TAROT 24% C.O. WJIANS LAIM WA3HINU10N IMIa/E71 OF E77EK OMSIIXI NO. 4 ACCORDWO TO IWE PLAT SURVEY FILM MXR Ar IF a81Z VOOP W BOOK 74 SURVEYS, PC. AdWOKEDRELUM THEREOF REL•ORLTED 1M YDW71E I OF PLATS, PAGE(S) AL W XWO 112. STAGE Of WAOArIFW.W yi wuur a AKAar COMM WASHWOTOM. SM)Alr IN THE COUNl1' OF KM STATE OF WASHWOMM PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME A$ ADDRESS: A"vMM WPh w°a°mGDvo WASM040, BASIS OF BEARINGS: 0AU r VANIT AND FW "N MW W ow.'c "OK PUNKW AMWWAUR _ To K COW/ m EE WE MOiNIR17M CFlf7 WK OF ME 20TH STREET AS SNOWN OF A A PACKSW 22ON.L 2OTH STREET R011M WA., 9D M rNt AWMA 4S) OMM" W ANb WMD MOM UN AWRW AM r40009M SNORT PLAT No, 245-7B. AOVVTX IROMCDO 1 HOnM WWrw AND AeADA/WAD01O HNT Mr MM AWD NFALID M *AK At M W TOW AND VBUJW n ACT AM D= ION VC ~0= rROrOr1 WITWU w RAND AAO OFMAL SOL MAL" AM= THE DAY AND MN AWRN/88: VERTICAL DATUM: � 7NC LOTS CREATED tIEREN/ FAiI WITHIN THE ZONE 2 OF Rf.MON'-S N TNET 2 CRFA7TKNI Tl1E ELLYI AOHS AWd CONCURS SAlOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON AWOtR AREA AND ARE TO AEQUIREW. Of 7NE CITY OF AENTOM ORDRMNCE N0. 48J7 AND AS AMENDED BY ORDR A" RM 4M WM CRT'S SOLE SOURCE AWANr /VEAO W AND ME ME ➢IRE OF 11•ADNBOIpI THE am of REMIOM NEWTWOAD( CONTROL WoMUWWF No. J" OF OWNKWO WATER 13 3UPPUM IRON A SM UPW "WER � 0 AT80WEN UNDER THE CM JURFACE 7MM LS NO NARNML SARRMR THE WA1MR TABLE AND (WOUND SURFACE a7WWr CARE w AANrrSROu coAAu OW" 79AAAD"Rr BENCHMARK K FOUND RAILROAD SMC ON SROMO BE ErFRCMM WHEN HANDMO OF ANY UOUO SUBSTAM" PONER POLE W SW OVAD OF 20TR Si. AND BLAME AM 07RER THAN WATER TO PROTECT FROM CONTACT WITH 7ME GROUND ELEVATION m J1f.3a FEET (SAW IM nU) SURFACE. ti 1S 771E IMWOWMIS REVONSISfUIY M PROTECT CONTOUR On WAL- 2' THE LSTYS ORRa Wo WATER. SITE ADDRESS. 224 NORTHEAST 20M SNAEE7 MION, WAMNO70N 08088 VICINITY SKETCH RECORDING CERTIFICATE r➢m ran irrum'?w MY br 200'4 AT- N. W LAOK- Of SI MM AT PAC: - AT rNE REOMEbf Of NOW'W t AS$OQWM I AWM OF AECOROE AND UAVIlOW BY ZONING: Mrs R-a PROPOSED DENSITY: 5.7 OWEUJKOS PER ACRE DENSITY ALLOWED: 0.71 WILLMOS M ACRE LOT AREAS: LOT 1: $0.030 S.F. O.2J A— LOr z: 5,466S.F. 0.13 AcmA TOTAL SIM 19,498 S.F. 0,J4 Aon1O IhM MeP -.really A po-nlr D Wurwy ma" by me a under My 41-Lfee An oAurA>.maAAOW rffh Nw nyulmmnrb a/ the SUmy RWcwdby Ad d 9. r "-1 oO Q-1- ✓ahmoe 4r M l 20W SURVEYOR'S CER7IFICATE Mldwd T. Me —PIS No. 2f,320 46 .rAAWw 'we ,r ar v AR IM,A SITE � E RENTO — 96056 INUAM NOR= A ANOUA70 PROFASSAMM suroum SDNva f74Z4 MOWN Corr U1. 11L VNnwR WA 98274 (MO 422-,M7 1 11, MOJO SNORT PLAT Sco1D: r•Wy0• Doq: Me, 2004 ✓ob NO: Ghd Drum by:" CAVd b1, -I- ShuN / oP t I 09% D4 • 5 T23N R;F W 1/2 i....... ... 74 ....... . ....... 1 n, Ave 1: ............. L7 .... ....... C/1)cry o to ..... .. .. ... ........ .. co -4w co co co C-Al Z/1 ta a5ld MEZI t • S(I PROPERTY SERM FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIONS No A p1 a. JoHt,lsot_1 APPLICANT: ��.�} i j�{^0 1-i !G}-I cS l=1 V t �,� l.�RECEIVED FROM (date) JOB ADDRESS: ;a NATURE OF WORK: 2 - �� C,�,���0_ 'x- X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVI ION B LONG PLAT, SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED LND ED M RE INFORMATION: - LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID #'s - VICINITY MAP SQUARE FOOTAGE - OTHER FRONT FOOTAGE SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PH)# -3.3q0-- NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on -site and off -site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building PermitlConstruction Permit application- - The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existence of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. - We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The followino nuntetl feet tin NnT i-1-1a ; r;.,,. f c;A- -,... _ . —__ _ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DISTRICT NO. PARCEL NO. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT UNITS ASSESSMENT OR FEE Latecomer Agreement (vt) WATER o Latecomer. Agreement (vt) WASTEWATER _a _ Latecomer Agreement (vt) OTHER _ Special Assessment District/WATER ► o0 1 t� t I o5a. o W - 11 i uYt?Al>= Sates S ecia Assessment District/WASTEWATER `� �= _ Joint Use Agreement (METRO) _ Local Improvement District * _ Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS _ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER - Estimated - Pd Prev. - Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) - Never Pd # OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG. SDC FEE Single family residential $1,525/unit x 1525.00 Mobile home dwelling unit $1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo $915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/s . ft. of property (not less than $1,525.00) x Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WASTEWATER - Estimated _ Pd Prey. - Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) -- Never Pd Single family residential $900/unit x 00 Mobile home dwelling unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $540/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial $0.126/s . ft. of property x(not less than $900.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SURFACEWATER _ Estimated Pd Prev. - Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) - Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $715/unit x 1 715.00 All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $715.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL t O F, O Signa�ufsewing Authority ATE t' h � — *If subject property is vvithin an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. E Current City' SDC fee charges apply to 0 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2004 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 2004 TO: Nancy Weil FROM: Sonja J. Fesser,�, SUBJECT: Mojo Short Plat, LUA-04-054-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant regarding the preliminary short plat submittal The indexing information, as shown, is incorrect. The subject short plat property falls within the NE'/4 of the SE'/4 of Section 5, not the SE'/4 of the NE'/4. Revise both drawing sheets. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-04-054-SHPL and LND-20-0373, respectively, on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. The surveyor will need to stamp, sign and date the final short plat drawings. Show ties (2) to the City of Renton Survey Control Network and provide a direct tie to the subject property. The geometry will be checked by the city when said ties are provided. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Note the symbols under the "LEGEND" block that represent "Found as noted hereon", "Found # 4 rebar, LS #14491", etc. that are not currently shown. What was found at the front corners of Lot 1 (short plat drawing) is not currently referenced in the "LEGEND". Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. \HAFile Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 - Short Plats\0373\RV040614.doc June 17, 2004 Page 2 The city will provide a new address for Lot 2 as soon as possible On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to trees, utility facilities, topog lines, wood fences and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for prelinvnary short plat approval. Encroachments do need to be shown. The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat drawing. Remove the reference to "PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY OF RENTON " and "DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT". Revise the city of Renton approvals block as needed. The word "NETWORK" is misspelled in the "VERTICAL DATUM" block (Sheet 1 of 2). Note all easements, agreements and restrictive covenants of record on the short plat drawing. The Chicago Title Insurance Co. Short Plat Certificate, dated April 26, 2004, notes a number of said such documents. Remove the "ZONING", "PROPOSED DENSITY" and "DENSITY ALLOWED" blocks from Sheet 1 of 2. Said blocks are not needed for recording purposes. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat will have the first recording number (recorded by King County). Provide references and spaces for the recording numbers of the associated documents on the short plat drawing. The short plat and the associated documents will be cross-referenced at the time of recording. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. H:\File Sys\LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 - Short Plats\0373\RV040614.doc\cor CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: F iVL Submitting Data: Planning/Building /Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation System Division October 4, 2004 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Leslie Lahndt (x 7223) Jason Fritzler (x 7243) Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Entranco Design Contract Correspondence.. Benson Road South - Main Avenue to S 261h Street Ordinance ............. And Other Citywide Curb and Pedestrian Resolution............ Improvements Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Ordinance 5073 Information......... TIP Documents #9 and #17 Contract Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept ...... Expenditure Required... $115,128.96 Transfer/Amendment....... $0 Amount Budgeted....... $270,000.00 Revenue Generated......... $466,000 Total Project Budget $736,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Transportation Systems Division desires to contract with Entranco to perform the design of the Benson Road South Project - Main Avenue to S 261h Street, curb ramps at select downtown locations, and additional pedestrian mobility improvements in the Highlands area. The work performed by Entranco will include exploration needed for design, preparation of the design plans, preparation of the specification package, and provide the City with a cost estimate for construction. The amount currently budgeted is $736,000, which includes the $320,000 Benson Road South - Main Avenue to S 26' Street fund and the $416,000 of the Walkway Program fund. The Benson Road portion included a Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) grant in the amount of $150,000. In addition, both the Benson Road and Walkway Program allocations were increased through King County Mitigation funds in the amount of $150,000 and $166,000, respectively. Combining the generated revenue of $466,000 (King County Mitigation plus TIB Grant) with the 2004 budget of $270,000 (Benson Road plus Walkway Program) brings the project's total budget to $736,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Division staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the proposed agreement with Entranco for the design of the Benson Road South - Main Avenue to S 261h Street Project and other minor pedestrian improvements in the City in the amount of $115,128.96. H:\Divisions\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 20MEntranco Design Agenda Bill 2.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 2004 TO: Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council ,r VIA: .I„Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: z� Gregg ZimmermaAministrator STAFF CONTACTS: Leslie Lahndt, x 7223 Jason Fritzler, x 7243 SUBJECT: Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 261h Street and Other Citywide Curb and Pedestrian Improvements ISSUE: The Transportation Systems Division desires to contract with Entranco to perform the design of the Benson Road South Project, curb ramps at select downtown locations, and additional pedestrian mobility improvements in the Highlands area. The work performed by Entranco will include exploration needed for design, preparation of the design plans, preparation of the specification package, and provide the City with a cost estimate for construction. The scope of work submitted by Entranco outlines in detail the locations and types of improvements that will be included within this design contract. RECOMMENDATION: Transportation Division staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the proposed agreement with Entranco for the design of the Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 26`h Street Project and other minor pedestrian improvements within the City in the amount of $115,128.96. BACKGROUND: In November 2003, the City was awarded a Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program (PSMP) grant of $150,000 to design and construct the Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 261h Street Project (2005-2010 TIP #17). The City's obligation would match TIB's funds at 69% of $331,900 for a total project cost of $481,900. This project would construct 3,330 lineal feet of new sidewalk, curb and gutter between City Hall and South 26`' Street. Additionally, a raised pavement crosswalk with a pedestrian refuge island will be constructed in the vicinity of the I- 405 overpass. In coordination with the Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 261h Street Project, the Transportation Division planned to construct additional pedestrian safety and mobility improvements within the City. These improvements would include new and upgraded curb ramps at select downtown locations and Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 26'h Street Project And Other Citywide Curb and Pedestrian Improvements October 4, 2004 Page 2 new sidewalk curb and gutter within the Highlands area. Funding for this portion of the project will come from the Walkway Program (2005-2010 TIP #9). On May 3, 2004, Council approved Ordinance 5073 to amend the 2004 CIP to allocate King County Mitigation Revenue to the Walkway Program and the Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 26'h Street Project. Currently, the Benson Road South — Main Avenue to S 26'h Street Project and the Walkway Program have $320,000 and $416,000 allocated in the 2004 budget, respectively. These funded sources will cover any future incurred expenses to start the design contract with Entranco. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2004Ussue Paper for Entranco 3.DOC CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 7 3 "'cCE n MAY - 6 2004 Transpor, -c.,:'. , Ys,c.nis Div AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2004 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TO ALLOCATE $2,216,000 IN KING COUNTY MITIGATION REVENUE TO SPECIFIC PROJECTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The budget appropriation in the Transportation Capital Improvement Fund will be increased by $2,216,000, bringing the total budget appropriation for this fund to $10,676,400. Revenue received from King County Mitigation will fund the total cost of the allocation. SECTION H. The funds will be appropriated as follows: Proieet Number Praiect Name 2004 Budget Inereace 317.012175 SR 169(Phase $ 1, 200,000 317.012186 Arterial Rehabilitation (Overlay Edmonds Ave. 200,000 317.000009 Walkway Program 166,000 317.012309 Benson Road Pedestrian 150,000 317.012310 Mitigation Reserve $ 500,000 __,County Total $ 2,216,000 SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of May , 2004. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 5073 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of May 2004. Approved as to form GX rence I Warre ity Attorney Date of Publication: 5/7/2004 (Summary) ORD. 1102:4/12/04:ma 4th4yolker-W�hceler, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION nnnc 15 n 1 v1- n M - - 11- I -1 \ I lr Walkway Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 9 RANK: 9 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425,430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for the design and construction of high priority non -motorized transportation facilities for pedestrians. Projects will be identified and prioritized in the upcoming The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study, completed in May 2003, is being used to Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study and through coordination with the Citys Neighborhood select projects that will move into the design and construction phases. Program. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Providing safe and convenient non -motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete transportation network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children, the Received $166,000 in King County Metro Mitigation in 2004 which was added to the aged and persons with disabilities, and will support increased use of transit. program in 2004 and 2005. Split out $179,400 in 2005 for the TIB Benson Road Project. Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2005 Funded : 11.564,133 lUnfunded : 240 000 Six -Year Pro ram EXPENSES: ITEM Programmed Sent In 2003 2004 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Development 94 133 67,533 20,000 6,600 6 600 Precon En /Admin 210 000 30,000 180 000 R-O-W includes Admin 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Construction Contract Fee 1,385,000 185,000 1 200 000 Construction -EnqJAdmin 115,000 185.000 203,000 203,000 203,000 203,000 203,000 15,000 100,000 Other 15,000 17,000 17,000 17 000 17,000 17,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,804,133 67,533 250,000 1,486,600 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 236,600 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1/2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 1,097,533 67,533 70,000 960,000 100,000 100 000 250 000 170 000 170,000 170,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 300 600 80,000 220,600 70,600 150,000 L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand KC Metro Mit 166 000 100,000 66,000 66,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I. D.'s Proposed Other Proposed 80,000. Undetermined 1 TOTAL SOURCES1 24 1,804,1331 1 67,5331 250,0001 240,000 1 486 600 1 236,6001 250,000 250 0001 80,000 250,000 80,000 250,000 250 000 a:m µ 5-9 FINAL CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION �nnr _ onin etV_vGAD -r!D Benson Road South - Main Avenue to S 26th St Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.6 miles Proj: 12309 RANK: 17 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: This project will complete three missing sidewalk links (2300 LF) on the east side of Benson Road S. Additionally, 1,000 LF of sidewalk near the 1-405 overpass will also connect to a previous TIB project bringing the total to 3,300 LF. A small retaining wall, raised painted crosswalk, and pedestrian refuge island will also be part of the project. JUSTIFICATION: Needed to improve the safety for children traveling to and from school and provide a safe pedestrian facility for those doing business north and south of the project. STATUS: CHANGES: New project. Received a TIB Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Program (PSMP) grant award of $150,000 (maximum amount) in November 2003. Received another $150,000 of King County Metro Mitigation funding approved by Council in April 2004. This project has been split from the Walkway Program. Funden un e Project Totals Programmed Pre-2005 Six Year Pro ram EXPENSES: ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2004 2004 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Development Precon En /Admin 57,800 20,000 37,800 37 800 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 385,500 385,500 385,500 Construction En /Admin 38 600 38,600 36100 2,500 Other TOTA EXPENSES SOURCES OF FUNDS: 481,900 20,000 461,900 459,400 2,500 1/2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 181,900 181,900 179,400 2,500 Grants In -Hand 150,000 10,000 140,000 140 000 Mitigation In -Hand L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand KC Metro Mit. 150,000 10,000 140,000 140.00 Grants Proposed Mitt ation Pro osed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 481,9001 20,0001 461,900 1 459,4001 2,5001 07riw2ou 91, AM 6.17 FINAL Consultant/Address/Telephone Local Agency Entranco Standard Consultant 10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300 Agreement Bellevue, WA 98004-4405 Agreement Number Federal Aid Number Project Title And Work Description Benson Road South Project Agreement Type (Choose one) To provide the City with Plans, Specifications, and ❑ Lump Sum Estimates for the Benson Road South Project. Lump Sum Amount $ (See Attached Scope of Work) ® Cost Plus Fixed Fee Overhead Progress Payment Rate 170.5 % DBE Participation .Overhead Cost Method ❑ Yes ® No % ❑ Actual Cost WBE Participation ❑ Actual Cost Not To Exceed % ❑ Yes ® No % Federal ID Number or Social Security Number 16 ® Fixed Rate Fixed Fee $ Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date ❑ Yes ® No August 31, 2005 ❑ Specific Rates Of Pay ❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate Total Amount Authorized $ 104,662.69 ❑ Provisional Hourly Rate Management Reserve Fund $ 10,466.27 ❑ Cost Per Unit of Work Maximum Amount Payable $ 115,128.96 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , between the Local Agency of City of Renton Washington, hereinafter called the "AGENCY", and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT'. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows: DOT Form 140-089 EF Page 1 of 8 Revised 12/99 All reports, PS&E materials, and other data, furnished GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned. All designs, drawings, specifications, The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of documents, and other work products prepared by the the above described work and services as herein CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of defined and necessary to accomplish the completed this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall PROJECT and are property of the AGENCY. Reuse furnish all services, labor and related equipment by the AGENCY or by others acting through or on necessary to conduct and complete the work as behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the II CONSULTANT. SCOPE OF WORK IV The Scope of Work and project level of effort for this TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION project is detailed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in III writing by the AGENCY. All work under this GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under All aspects of coordination of the work of this completion date. AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or individuals shall receive advance approval by the The established completion time shall not be extended AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with because of any delays attributable to the CONSULT - agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated ANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY, in the through the AGENCY. event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, GOD or governmental actions or other conditions progress and presentation meetings with the beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior AGENCY or such Federal, Community, State, City supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is or County officials, groups or individuals as may be required to extend the established completion time. requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior V to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation. PAYMENT The minimum number of hours or days notice — � required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "B" for completed work and services rendered under this attached hereto and made part of this AGREEMENT. AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "C" attached The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly hereto, and by this reference made part of this progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compen- that will outline in written and graphical form the sation for work performed or services rendered and various phases and the order of performance of the f or all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and work in sufficient detail so that the progress of the incidentals necessary to complete the work work can easily be evaluated. Goals for Disadvan- specified in Section Il, "Scope of Work". The taged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women CONSULTANT shall conform with all applicable Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) if required shall portions of 48 CFR 31. be shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. Page 2 of 8 VI SUBCONTRACTING The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement. Compensation for this subconsultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G, at- tached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been issued by the AGENCY. All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non - salary costs and fixed fee costs for the subconsultant shall be substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V. All subcontracts exceeding $10,000 in cost shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for subcontracting shall create, between the AGENCY and subcontractor, any contract or any other relationship. VII EMPLOYMENT The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consider- ation, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, or in its discre- tion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may or might arise under any Workmen's compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or part time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of the contract, in the employ of the United States Depart- ment of Transportation, the STATE, or the AGENCY, except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person. VIII NONDISCRIMINATION The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employ- ment or for services because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employ- ment upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or any recruitment advertising, a layoff or terminations, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, selection for training, rendition of services. The CONSULT- ANT understands and agrees that if it violates this provision, this AGREEMENT may be terminated by the AGENCY and further that the CONSULTANT shall be barred from performing any services for the AGENCY now or in the future unless a showing is made satisfactory to the AGENCY that discrimina- tory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest agrees as follows: A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regula- tions relative to nondiscrimination in the same manner as in Federal -assisted programs of the Page 3 of 8 Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorpo- rated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT. The consultant shall comply with the American Disabilities Act of 1992, as amended. B. NONDISCRIMINATION: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed by it during the AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital status, national origin or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification in the selec- tion and retention of subconsultants, including procurements of materials and leases of equip- ment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix II of the Regulations. C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS, INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF MATERI- ALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's obligations under this AGREEMENT and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital status, national origin and handicap. D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the AGENCY to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information required of the CONSULTANT is in the exclu- sive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information the CONSULTANT shall so certify to the AGENCY, or the United States Department of Transportation as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: 1. Withholding of payments to the CONSULT- ANT under the AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT complies, and/or 2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part. F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (A) through (G) in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CON- SULTANT shall take such action with respect to any subconsultant or procurement as the AGENCY or the Federal Highway Administra- tion may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompli- ance; provided, however, that, in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CON- ULTANT may request the AGENCY to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY, and in addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW 49.60.180. Page 4 of 8 IX TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten days written notice to the CONSULTANT. In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit F for the type of AGREEMENT used. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten days following receipt by the CONSULT- ANT of the Notice to terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due computed as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid. If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CON- SULTANT, the above formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULT- ANT in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termina- tion, whether that work is in a form or a type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination; the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which maybe required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the work per- formed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsec- tion exceed the amount which would have been made using the formula set forth in the previous paragraph. If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULT- ANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's failure to perform is without it or it's employee's fault or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY in accordance with the provision of this AGREEMENT. In the event of the death of any member, partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervi- sory personnel assigned to the project, or, dissolution of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or disaffiliation of the principally involved employee, the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the AGENCY. The subsection shall not be a bar to renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY's concur- rence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT, payment shall be made as set forth in the second paragraph of this section. Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of any type it may have against the CON- SULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULT- ANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitle- ment to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT. X CHANGES OF WORK The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section XIV. Page 5 of 8 XI that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to DISPUTES indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against and hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE from Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connec- tion with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT between the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT, provided however, that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be subject to de novo judicial review. XII VENUE, APPLICABLE LAW AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washing- ton, situated in the county the AGENCY is located in. The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal from such decisions of the Superior court in accor- dance with the laws of the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located in. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accord with the laws of Washington. The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE, and their officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of defending such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid and enforce- able only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's agents or employees. The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor. The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's own employees against the AGENCY and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that this waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to the provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the subject of mutual negotiation. Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject to the processing of an acceptable, supplemental agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide on -call assistance to the AGENCY during contract adminis- tration. By providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as other- wise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to RCW 48. Page 6 of 8 Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE. B. General commercial liability insurance in an amount not less than a single limit of one million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury, including death and property damage per occurrence. Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance and any professional liability insurance secured by the CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all certificates of insurance as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within 14 days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to the AGENCY. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars, whichever is the greater unless modified by Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANTs professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this section. This remedy is not exclu- sive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take such other action as is available to them under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law. XIV EXTRA WORK A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMENT in the services to be performed. B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise affects any other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the (1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms and shall modify the AGREE- MENT accordingly. C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request for equitable adjustment" (hereafter referred to as claim) under this clause within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim submitted before final payment of the AGREEMENT. D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause. However nothing in this clause shall excuse the CON- SULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed. E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this AGREEMENT. XV ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS The CONSULTANT shall place his endorsement on all plans, estimates or any other engineering data furnished by him. Page 7 of 8 XVI FEDERAL AND STATE REVIEW The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to participate in the review or examination of the work in progress. XVII CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT AND THE AGENCY Attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1", are the Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency, Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment, suspension and other responsibility matters - primary covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3" Certification regarding the restrictions of the use of Federal funds for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4" Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibits "A-3" and "A-4" are only required in Agreements over $100,000. XVIII COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contains all covenants, stipulations and provisions agreed upon by the parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for, any statement, represen- tation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this AGREEMENT. XIX EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the proposal, and the supporting materials submitted by the CONSULT- ANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. By By Consultant Agency Page 8 of 8 I hereby certify that I am representative of the firm of firm I here represent has: Exhibit A-1 Certification Of Consultant Entranco Project No. Local Agency and duly authorized whose address is and that neither I nor the above (a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure this contract. (b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or to retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract. (c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution donation or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any): I further certify that the firm I hereby represent is authorized to do business in the State of Washington and that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the board of Professional Registration. I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the State Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. Certification of Agency Official I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Renton Washington and that the above consulting firm or their representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to: (a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or (b) Pay or agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind, except as here expressly stated (if any). I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid highway funds and it subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. Date Exhibit A-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -Primary Covered Transactions 1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph l .b. of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default. 2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Consultant (Firm): Entranco (Date) (Signature) President or Authorized Official of Consultant Exhibit A-3 Certification Regarding The Restrictions of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Consultant (Firm): Entrance, (Date) (Signature) President or Authorized Official of Consultant Exhibit A-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data This is to verify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4) submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the contracting officer's representative in support of * are accurate, complete, and current as of **. This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal. Firm Entranco Name Title Date of Execution*** * Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.). ** Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement was reached. *** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to. EXHIBIT B-1 Scope of Services Benson Road South Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program Renton, Washington This project consists of designing a Portland cement concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, and retaining walls at selected locations along Benson Road South between Renton City Hall and South 26"' Street. The project will also provide for Minor Improvements for the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps at various other locations in the City. The work will be conducted in two phases: Phase One: Preliminary Engineering 1. This Phase includes two distinct design tasks: a. Plans, Specifications, and Estimate shall be prepared for the Benson Road South Improvements, which includes the following locations: 1. 220 LF of sidewalk just north of Eagle Ridge Drive South at the power transmission line 2. 230 LF of sidewalk from the intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive South, potentially requiring a 3-10-foot high retaining wall 3. 330 LF at South 26"' St. connecting to a previous project 4. 1,000 LF of sidewalk near the I-405 overpass 5. A raised painted crosswalk and pedestrian refuge island will be constructed near the I-405 overpass b. Minor Improvements at selected other locations in the City, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, curb ramps, and associated utility relocations. These plans shall include minimal design. Locations of the Minor Improvements are as follows: A. 270 LF of sidewalk and one curb ramp on the west side of Harrington Avenue from NE 9th to NE Sunset Boulevard C. 300 LF of sidewalk and 4 curb ramps on NE 9'h from Ferndale Circle NE to Glenwood Avenue NE D. 220 LF of sidewalk and 2 curb ramps on NE 9`h from Ferndale Circle NE to Ferndale Circle NE E. 110 LF of sidewalk and one curb ramp on Harrington Avenue NE from Glenwood Avenue NE to NE Wh F. 500 LF of sidewalk and 2 curb ramps on Harrington Avenue NE from NE 10`h Street to Glenwood Avenue NE G. 190 LF of sidewalk and 2 curb ramps on NE 10"' Street from Harrington Avenue NE to Sunset Lane NE H. 360 LF of sidewalk and 1 curb ramp on NE 20'h Street from Kirkland Avenue NE to Kirkland Place NE I. 4 curb ramps on Hillcrest Lane NE from Harrington Ave NE to Kirkland Ave NE Priority #1224 700 LF of asphalt path and 1 curb ramp on NE 3rd Street just west of Jefferson Avenue NE Priority #16, 21, 36, 62 30 SY of walkway and 4 curb ramps on S/SW 7 h Street between Lind and Morris H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASOMBenson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 Curb Ramps Curb ramps will be replaced at the following downtown locations: 1. 3rd and Shattuck — ramps at all 4 corners 2. Alley between 3rd and Saint Anthony's on Whitworth — 4 ramps 3. 3rd and Smithers — ramps at SE and SW 4. 4"' and Shattuck — ramp at SE 5. 4"' and Morris — ramps at NE and NW 6. 4"' and Whitworth — ramp at SW 7. 5`h and Burnett — ramps at NE and NW 8 2nd and Burnett — ramp at NW 9. 4`h and Wells — ramps at NE and SE 10. 2nd and Shattuck- ramp at SW 11. Houser and Wells — ramps at NE and SE • Phase Two: Construction Engineering The Preliminary Engineering phase is expected to begin in August 2004 and be completed by January 2005. Optional services provided during the Construction Engineering phase are expected to begin in January 2005 and be completed by July 2005. The Consultant will provide professional services for the preparation of contract plans, contract specifications, and opinions of cost to construct the Benson Road South Pedestrian and Safety Mobility Program, as detailed below. ASSUMPTIONS: 1. Budget for the project scope is based on a project design schedule of 4 months commencing with notice -to -proceed. 2. Labor -hour estimates assume that one contract bid package will be prepared representing all work items associated with this project. 3. The level of effort for each phase and task of work is limited to the amount of labor costs and expenses indicated in Exhibit B. These costs are itemized in Exhibit B to aid in project tracking purposes only. The budget may be transferred between tasks, provided the total contract amount is not exceeded. Additional services beyond these limits will be considered Extra Work. 4. No hazardous, dangerous, or contaminated soil/ground water will be encountered on or within the project limits. Should any of these materials be encountered, addressing the situation will be Extra Work. 5. The sidewalk and associated retaining wall at Benson Road South Improvements location 1 (see above) can be installed without modification to the power transmission tower. 6. No additional pavement will be required for Benson Road South Improvements location 4. Lane striping will be shifted to accommodate the sidewalk construction on existing asphalt paving. 7. Drainage improvements on Benson Road South shall be limited to conveyance system installations or relocations. No detention or water quality treatment will be required. 8. No drainage improvements are included with the Minor Improvements. 9. The walls on the Project will either be structural earth walls, cast -in -place reinforced concrete retaining walls, or rockeries. There will be a total of two walls on the project with approximate lengths of 200 ft and 180 ft H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 2 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 I. TASK DESCRIPTIONS A. PHASE ONE - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1. Project Administration The project manager will be responsible to the City to ensure that the design is completed on schedule, is technically competent, and reasonably meets the City's needs and expectations. The project manager will provide overall project management including direction and monitoring of sub -consultants, coordination with the City, progress reports, and invoicing. The project manager will also initiate appropriate quality assurance and control procedures. a. Quality Assurance Review. The CONSULTANT shall implement quality assurance procedures to ensure that all project deliverables are subjected to in-house peer reviews prior to submittal to the CITY. These reviews will be conducted under the direction of the CONSULTANT's Project Quality Assurance Manager and Project Manager, and will focus on checking the major design elements with respect to adequacy of response to the specific design challenges, conformance to accepted design practices, and compliance with the CITY's standards. A quality assurance check shall be used to confirm that the design work and drawing presentation follows the CITY standards and that the work is of professional quality meeting the customary standard of care for the type of work in this locale. The CONSULTANT shall include with each submittal a response to the CITY's comments generated from the previous submittal, with an indication either directly on the redlined set or in memo form of the actions taken on each comment. The CONSULTANT shall verify all CITY comments on previous submittals have been addressed (or provide written response as to why the changes have not been made). The CONSULTANT shall return with each submittal any agency redlined comments from the previous submittal. Deliverables: Comment Response Form b. Project Invoicing. Separate project invoices shall be required for the Benson Road South Improvements and the Minor Improvements. Deliverables: Separate Monthly Invoices 2. Survey c. Field Survey. Complete ground -based field topographic survey with three dimensional locations of significant surface features, such as signs, pavement, curbs, sidewalks, utility structures and appurtenances, retaining walls, slopes, drainage structures, drainage pipes, drainage ditch and swales, significant trees (i.e., 4-inch diameter or greater), and landscape improvements (i.e., hedge outline, private irrigation systems, monument signs). Genus, family or species of trees and shrubs will not be identified. Field survey data will be adequate to support the accurate mapping of 1-foot vertical contours over the project area. d. Utility Surveys. Perform additional field surveys to locate utilities that may conflict with rehabilitation alternatives. Emphasis will be on determining the vertical location of the potential conflicting utilities by measure -downs at vaults or from surface valves. If additional H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 3 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 information is needed, pot holing will be authorized as Extra Work, and a vactor truck will be used to create small diameter pot holes to locate sub -surface features. e. Data Transfer/Base Mapping. Transfer field data to MicroStation mapping system, including cross-section data; integrate with property boundary, right-of-way, and utility data; and prepare 1 inch = 20 foot base sheets. Right-of-way location shall be limited to manually scaling of existing City maps and/or County Assessor maps, whichever is judged more accurate. All surveying and Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) work will be done in accordance with City of Renton survey and CAD standards. Deliverables: Microstation Basemap f. Field Survey Pickups. Following completion of the 30% plans, field survey pickups will be performed at locations deemed necessary. It is assumed that this work will take 16 hours to complete. Deliverables: Additional survey pickups 3. Geotechnical a. Review available geological and/or geotechnical records for the area and for the existing structures. b. Advance three shallow borings (or test pits) in the area of the proposed walls. c. Perform limited soil characterization tests of the samples (ie: grain size and moisture content). d. Analyze the soil data and provide geotechnical wall earth pressures and foundation support recommendations as well as general earthwork related construction requirements. e. Discuss the probable options for wall type and their relative costs. f. Prepare a geotechnical report containing the field boring logs, laboratory data and recommendations. Deliverables: Geotechnical Report 4. Utility Impact Assessment a. Data Collection. Compile and review existing utility information obtained from the City and other utility owners. b. Utility Coordination. Contact utilities to determine potential for future projects that would damage the proposed new sidewalk. Identify ways to incorporate future utility needs, if any, into the sidewalk plans. c. Utility Impact Assessment and Alternative Evaluation. Compile utility information on base maps. Assess impacts to utilities from proposed sidewalk. Identify actions needed to address utility conflicts. Deliverables: none HADivision.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 4 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 5. Minor Improvements Field Visit a. At a field meeting including Entranco designers and City representatives, each site identified for Minor Improvements (see section 7.b) shall be visited. The purpose of this site visit shall be to identify any improvements that require more design effort than a vicinity map, Standard Plan callouts, and minor construction notes. An evaluation as to whether or not the Minor Improvement will fit within existing right-of-way will also be made during the site visit. b. If one of the Minor Improvements requires an engineering effort more than that described in section 5. a, the City will decide whether to continue with design effort as Extra Work, or to remove the location from the project. Deliverables: attendance at one field meeting for two people list of deleted project locations 6. Drainage Memorandum a. A memorandum shall be prepared summarizing potential drainage improvements associated with the sidewalk installation. This memorandum will allow City staff to evaluate which drainage elements must be included, and which elements may be deferred or not completed. Deliverables: Drainage Memorandum 7. Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Prepare final design and plans, Contract Provisions, and Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. There will be two distinct design tasks within the plans. a. Benson Road South Improvements — This PS&E shall be a typical public transportation construction plan set, including the following items: 1. Title and Index Sheet (1 Sheet, not -to -scale (NTS)) Title and index sheet will include a vicinity map. This sheet will be based on the City -provided AutoCAD template, which includes the general City vicinity map. 2. Legend, Abbreviations, and General Notes (1 Sheet, NTS) i. Sheet will present legend, abbreviations, and general notes for contract drawings. 3. Roadway Sections (1 Sheet, NTS) i. Roadway sections for the typical roadway cross -sections for construction. 4. Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plans/Curb and Drainage Profiles (4 Sheets, Scale H:1 " =20', V:1 " =5') i. These plans will be a "split sheet," format, containing both plan and profile elements. The plans will include: • horizontal alignment information, paving limits, retaining walls (assumed to be standard rockeries, "unit masonry" or WSDOT cantilever walls), and limits of any cut/fill required. • limits of pavement removal and grading • proposed drainage H.\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 5 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 • Elevation and pipe slope information for drainage laterals, on plan view; elevation and pipe slope information for main drainage lines on the drainage profiles. • Adjustments of valve boxes and manholes ii. It is assumed that no municipal utilities design work (such as sewer or water main lines) will be included in the project. iii. The plans will include proposed curb spot elevations to control the vertical elements of the work. On the profile, drainage profiles will be prepared by the Consultant for the main drainage lines throughout the project. These profiles will provide information on drainage structure types, rim elevations and invert elevations. Design slopes between drainage structures will be shown here and not on the Plans. Profiles will not be prepared for the laterals. 5. Wall Plans (3 Sheets, Scale H:1" =20" V:l" =20) i. Wall plans, profiles, and detail sheets, which include miscellaneous details not covered by standard plans. Standard plans will be utilized to the maximum extent possible. Standard plan details will be exhibited on 8 1/2" x 11" pages attached to the Contract Provisions and will not be included in the contract drawing set. 6. Erosion Control and Drainage Details (2 Sheets, NTS) i. Erosion control and drainage detail sheets, which include miscellaneous details not covered by standard plans. Standard plans will be utilized to the maximum extent possible. Standard plan details will be exhibited on 8 1/2" x 11" pages attached to the Contract Provisions and will not be included in the contract drawing set. 7. Landscape Plans (2 Sheets, NTS) i. Landscape plans shall include plantings and any necessary soil work to restore existing landscaping and minor landscape improvements as necessary. 8. Signal Plans (2 Sheets, NTS) i. Signal plans, details, and wiring diagram for the addition of a north -south pedestrian movement on Benson Road South at South 26t" Street. b. Minor Improvements at selected other locations in the City, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, curb ramps, and associated utility relocations. These plans shall include minimal design, and will include the following sheets: 1. Vicinity Map(s) and Standard Plan Key(s) (2 sheets, 1"=100') i. This sheet will show the locations of the Minor Improvements so that the contractor can locate which street and on which side or intersection corner the improvement is located. Construction bubbles will be used to show which Standard Plan(s) apply at each location. Minor construction notes may be added to clarify any field fit issues noted at the site visit described in section 5. a. ii. These plans will clearly show that the Contractor will be expected to field fit the standard plan design at the locations shown. No graphical depiction of the proposed Minor Improvements will be included. Deliverables: Vicinity Map and Standard Plan Key(s) at the 30, 90, and 100 percent levels H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 607 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 c. Contract Provisions. Prepare Contract Special Provisions for the project. These will include Special Provisions for the items of work that are not covered by the 2004 WSDOT/ APWA Standard Specifications, including the Division 1-99 APWA Supplement, and including any Agency General Requirements, and bid and Contract forms. Agency will furnish examples of the Contract Documents to Consultant, and will prepare the "boilerplate" elements of the Contract Specifications. Deliverables: Contract Special Provisions at the 90 and 100 percent levels d. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Calculate quantities, prepare bid items and quantities for contract proposal and opinion of construction costs based upon the approved construction plans, and current unit bid prices. 1. Two separate Schedules of Prices will be prepared for the Benson Road South Improvements and the Minor Improvements i. As minimal design will be applied to the Minor Improvements, quantities calculated will be limited to "finished items", such as curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps. No quantities will be calculated for earthwork, removals, property restoration, or any other preparation work required to provide the "finished items." Specifications will indicate that the bidder is to include preparation work in the bid prices for the finished items. Any cost estimates provided by the Consultant will be on a basis of experience and judgment, but since it has no control over market conditions or bidding procedures the Consultant cannot warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these cost estimates. Deliverables: Opinion of Probable Construction Cost at the 90 and 100 percent levels e. Construction Critical Path Schedules Prepare two critical path construction schedules, one for the Benson Road South Improvements and one for the Minor Improvements. Deliverables: Separate Critical Path Construction Schedules at the 90 and 100 percent levels f. Submittals & Review Meetings. The CONSULTANT shall prepare PS&E submittals to the CITY for review. The CONSULTANT shall participate in review meetings with the CITY following each submittal, as defined below. Following each meeting, the CITY shall provide to the CONSULTANT their formal review comments. The CITY may consolidate their comments into a single set of plans and special provisions to the extent possible, so as to facilitate the CONSULTANTS response. If CITY comments are not consolidated into a single set, the CITY shall be responsible for coordinating and resolving any conflicts or discrepancies between conflicting comments. The CONSULTANT shall modify the plans and special provisions to incorporate CITY review comments, or otherwise resolve such comments, at which point the submittal shall be considered to be 100% complete. 30% Submittal The CONSULTANT shall submit five (5) half size plan and details for the 30% submittal,. 90% and 100% Submittal H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\BensonSidewalkScope-FINAL.DOC % of % ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 The CONSULTANT shall submit two (2) full size and five (5) half size plan and specification sets for the 90% and 100% submittals, which shall be the complete PS&E and shall include all drawings, quantities, the specification package, the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and preliminary critical path schedules for construction. Final PS&E Submittal The CONSULTANT shall submit one (1) full-size (on 4 mil mylar) plan sets and original unbound specification sets for the final PS&E, which shall include all drawings complete, the CONSULTANT's stamp, date and signature, the quantities complete, the specifications package ready to advertise for bid, the final Engineer's opinion of probable construction cost and preliminary critical path schedule for construction. The CONSULTANT shall make no further changes to the documents without approval of the CITY. The CITY shall sign and date the drawing. The Consultant shall prepare for, attend, and document up to two (2) review meetings with the CITY following submittal of the 95% and 99% packages. The Consultant shall incorporate CITY comments into the following submittal package. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a response matrix or memo clearly showing how CITY's comments were incorporated into the revised plans. Deliverables: Submittal review meetings documentation Response to Agency's Comments 8. Bidding Assistance The Consultant will be available to answer questions during the bidding of the contract. This work will include preparing addenda if necessary and evaluating the contractor bids and making a recommendation to award if asked by the City. Because of the unknown nature of this task, it will be restricted to the hours shown in the fee section. 9. Permitting Assistance The Consultant will prepare a draft "no effect" letter for submission to the City. The City will coordinate with all regulatory agencies. It is assumed that no other permits or environmental documentation is required. B. PHASE TWO - CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (OPTIONAL) The following is a generic scope of work for Construction Engineering Services. Nothing has been included in the budget for these services at this time. If the City desires to include any or all of these services, they will be authorized as Extra Work. 1. Attend Pre -Construction Conference. 2. Provide administration of the contract during construction of the project, including: • Participate in project meetings. • Respond to requests for information, plan interpretation, and/or changes. 3. Submittal Review H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASOMBenson Sidewalk Scope -. FINAL.DOC 8 of % ENTRANCO August 5,2004 Review or cause to be reviewed shop drawings, samples, traffic control plans, test reports, and other data submitted by the Contractor for compliance with the requirements of the contract documents. 4. Site Visits Make bi-weekly site visits (up to 8 assumed) to observe the construction work in progress for general compliance with design. 5. Final Review Conduct final review and ascertain if the work has been performed in accordance with the contract documents, including response to property owner concerns during the final review. Work with City to prepare punch list of items to be completed. 6. Final Records Provide final records and draft Record Drawings, per City of Renton Standards, to show construction changes as provided by the Contractor. Record drawings will be in red ink on mylar. Record drawing information will not be recorded on electronic files, unless specifically requested in the Extra Work Agreement for Construction Engineering. Consultant shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences of procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work performed by the contractor(s) and any subcontractors. II. DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the design. Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, will be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments as of the date of signing of this Agreement, of the following documents. Changes in any design standards or requirements after work has begun may result in Extra Work. Measurements will be in English units. Drafting Standard: WSDOT/APWA Datum: Horizontal: City of Renton NAD-83(91) Vertical: City of Renton N.G.V.D. of 1988 1. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) 2. WSDOT Design Manual 3. AASHTO (1990 Edition) A Policy on Geometric Design (Green Book) 4. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 5. City of Renton Standard Plans and Specifications 6. APWA and WSDOT Standard Plans and Specifications (English version, 2004) 7. City and County Design Standards (WSDOT, 1994) 8. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993) 9. WSDOT Bridge Design Manual, Current through 2004 10. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3Td Edition 2004 11. WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, 2004 III.DOCUMENTS FURNISHED BY CONSULTANT TO CITY HADivision.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASON\Benson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 9 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 The following documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement ("Documents'') shall be furnished by Consultant to City upon completion of the various phases of the work. Whether the Documents are submitted in electronic media or in tangible format, any use of the Documents on another project or on extensions of this project beyond the use for which they were intended, or any modification of the Documents, or conversion of the Documents to an alternate system or format shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant; City shall assume all risks associated with such use, modifications, or conversions. Consultant may remove from the electronic Documents delivered to City all references to Consultant's involvement and will retain a tangible copy of the Documents delivered to City which shall govern the interpretation of the Documents and the information recorded. Electronic files are considered working files only —Consultant is not required to maintain electronic files beyond 90 days after project final billing, and makes no warranty as to the viability of electronic files beyond 90 days from date of transmittal. l . Two (2) copies of the Engineer's opinion of probable construction cost at the 90 percent and 100 percent design submittals. 2. Five (5) sets of all sheets (at half-size, [11" x 17"] on bond paper) comprising the set of project plans for City review at the 30, 90 and 100 percent completion stage. 3. Two (2) sets of all sheets (at full size, [22"x34"] on mylar) comprising the set of project plans at the 100 percent completion stage. 4. Two (2) copies of the specifications for City review at the 90 and 100 percent design submittal. 5. One (1) copy of survey control data. 6. One (1) copy of the geotechnical memorandum and data sheets. 7. One (1) set of 1 "=20' scale "full-size" Contract Plans on vellum. 8. One (1) set of record drawing mylars for use by the City (as part of Phase Two). IV. ITEMS FURNISHED BY CITY TO CONSULTANT City will provide the following items and services to Consultant that will facilitate the preparation of the plans and studies within the limits of the project. Consultant is entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of the data furnished by others, including but not limited to, survey and traffic data. 1. Any available record drawings and information on public works projects in the project area. 2. Any available information pertaining to existing survey monumentation and bench marks. 3. Existing right-of-way information within the project route. 4. Consolidation of all review comments onto one copy of each submittal. 5. The City will advertise the project, and distribute Bid Documents. 6. Rights -of -entry upon all lands necessary for the performance of the work will be obtained by the City. 7. Payment of all review and/or permit fees. 8. Pot -holing for utility locations (if existing data is insufficient for design purposes). 9. Title reports for affected properties (if required). 10. Right-of-way negotiation and acquisition (if required). H.\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\JASOMBenson Sidewalk Scope - FINAL.DOC 10 of 7 ENTRANCO August 5, 2004 Exhibit C-2 Payment (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work specified in Section II, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48 CFR 31. A. Actual Costs Payment for all consulting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT's actual cost plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost. 1. Direct Salary Costs The direct salary cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT. 2. Overhead Costs Overhead costs are those costs.other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the rate shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT, under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT. The three options are explained as follows: a. Actual Cost Not To Exceed Maximum Percent: If this method is indicated in the heading of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT at the actual overhead rate verified by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment when accumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change during the life of the AGREEMENT. A summary of the CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as Exhibit D-1 and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the Actual Cost Not To Exceed method is used, the CONSULTANT (prime and all subconsultants) will submit to the AGENCY within three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose of adjusting the overhead rate for billing purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to reflect the actual rate. Failure to supply this information by either the prime consultant or any of the subconsultants shall cause the agency to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved. The STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the CONSULTANT's books and records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire. 3. Direct Nonsalary Costs Direct nonsalary costs will be reimbursed at the actual cost to the CONSULTANT. These charges may include, but are not limited to the following items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges, and fees of subconsultants. Air or train travel will only be reimbursed to economy class levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. Automobile mileage for travel will be reimbursed at the current rate approved for AGENCY employees and shall be supported by the date and time of each trip with origin and destination of such trips. Subsistence and lodging expenses will be reimbursed at the same rate as for AGENCY employees. The billing for nonsalary cost, directly identifiable with the Project, shall be an itemized listing of the charges supported by copies of original bills, invoices, expense accounts, and miscellaneous supporting data retained by the CONSULTANT. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be provided to the AGENCY upon request. All of the above charges must be necessary for the services to be provided under this AGREEMENT. 4. Fixed Fee The fixed fee, which represents the CONSULTANT's profit, is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any additional fixed fee which could be authorized from the Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the scope of work defined in this AGREEMENT and the estimated man -months required to perform the stated scope of work. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the CONSULTANT, the supplemental agreement may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The fixed fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the monthly progress reports accompanying the invoices. Any portion of the fixed fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section IX, Termination of Agreement. 5. Management Reserve Fund The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator the flexibility of authorizing additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this agreement. This fund may be replenished in a subsequent supplemental agreement. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of the "Management Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance with Section XIV, `Extra Work." 6. Maximum Total Amount Payable The maximum total amount payable, by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the Fixed Fee and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for extra work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work." B. Monthly Progress Payments The CONSULTANT may submit invoices to the AGENCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the calculated overhead and fee not more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such invoices shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under Section I1I, General Requirements, of this AGREEMENT. The invoices will be supported by an itemized listing for each item including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of recording the names, titles, and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview. C. Final Payment Final payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within ninety (90) days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. D. Inspection of Cost Records The CONSULTANT and the subconsultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the AGENCY and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception: if any litigation, claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this contract is initiated before the expiration of the three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed. EXHIBIT D CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SUMMARY SHEET (COST PLUS FIXED FEE) (Project Number) PROJECT: DIRECT SALARY COST (DSC): Estimated Estimated Estimated Classification Hours Rates Cost Principal 2 x $68.37 = $136.74 Proj. Mgr. 4 44 x $60.53 = $2,663.32 Proj. Engr/Sci 304 x $35.16 = $10,688.64 Staff Eng./Sci 4 x $31.62 = $126.48 EngJSci 255 x $28.71 = $7,321.05 Engr/Sci 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 Tech Edit 10 x $30.28 = $302.80 Word Proc. 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 CADD 234 x $24.39 = $5,707.26 Graphic Illus. 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 Sury Mgr 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 Sury Off.-Ld 16 x $31.39 = $502.24 Survey Crew 64 x $24.23 = $1,650.72 Res Mgr/Sr Mgr 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 Ld TechSup 0 x $0.00 = $0.00 Proj. Asst. 32 x $26.72 = $855.04 TOTAL DSC 965 $29,854.29 OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 170.5 % x $29,854.29 = $50,889.62 FIXED FEE (FF): FF Rate x (DSC+OH) of 16 % x $80,743.91 = $12,919.03 REIMBURSABLES: Internal Mileage/company Vehicle ($0.36/mile) $0.00 External Per Diem $0.00 Lodging $0.00 Mileage/personal Vehicle ($0.36/mile) $25.00 Travel $0.00 Meals $0.00 Supplies $0.00 Reproduction $100.00 Telephone $0.00 Postage/Delivery $100.00 Other $0.00 Markup = 15% $33.75 Externai $258.75 Total Reimbursables $258.75 SUBCONSULTANT COSTS (See Exhibit G) $9,340.00 Markup = 15% $1,401.00 Subconsultant Total $10,741.00 TOTAL $104,662.69 MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND = 10% $10,466.27 GRAND TOTAL = $116,128.96 PREPARED BY: DATE: ivmreVcfa woMkreawvstoolastMkp"Aw%Ex Dlag CoNren _01_ GRP-800AS lrev.sot) CPFF PROJECT BUDGET SETUP I CC '� ect Name Benson Road South Improvements se Name Design 10 Branch # Project # Phase # Group # Phase Rev. No. CONTRACT TYPE: Lump Sum CPFF . X CPNF Cost x mult Hourly Budget Includes Expenses? (Y/N) Target Multipliers Total Revision S: #REF! O Labor 3.14 ❑ Revised 170.46% OH 16% Profit Subconsultants 1.15 * ❑ Revised ❑ Revised ❑ Revised If CPFF/CPNF Profit $: 12,919.03 © Outside Reimb. 1.15 * Revised " (1 + markup for handling) Special Billing Requirements: Invoice Submittal Date: Retainage: % Date Retainer Reed: ❑ Progress Report ❑ Expense Backup ❑ Time Entry Report ❑ Rate Table: (If standard branch rate table, list rate year, if project -specific, attach rate table) Additional Billing Information: LABOR EXPENSES Labor Code Description Hours Direct Billable" Outside Reimbursables Description Direct Billable* Internal Rate Pays Description Billable PHASE 1 - DESIGN 0 #REF! #REF! E507 Per Diem $0.00 $0.00 E508 Lodging $0.00 $0.00 E509 Mileage $25.00 $28.75 (personal car, $.375/mile) E510 Travel $0.00 $0.00 E511 Meals $0.00 $0.00 E512 Supplies $0.00 $0.00 E513 Reproduc. $100.00 $115.00 E514 Telephone $0.00 $0.00 E516 Postage/ $100.00 $115.00 Delivery E517 Other $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL $225.00 $258.75 E504 Mileage C 0 $.375/mile (El vehicle) Task 1: Project Management & Adm' 26 $1,183.74 $3,201.54 16 $461.28 $1,247.58 Task 2: Survey 80 $2,052.96 $5,552.44 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! "REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! Task 3: Geotechnical 0 $0.00 $0.00 Task 4: Utility Impact Assessment 8 $229.68 $621.19 8 $229.68 $621.19 12 $370.32 $1,001.57 260 $7,419.60 $20,067.05 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL BILLABLE EXPENSES: $258.75 O #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! SUBCONSULTANTS Code Name Direct BillablE #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! (acct.) 1) MILBOR-P1TA $9,340.00 $10,741 2) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 3) 'Enter Name" $0.00 $0 4) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 5) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 6) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 7) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 8) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 9) "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 10; "Enter Name" $0.00 $0 TOTAL SUBS: $9,340.00 $10,741 TOTALS: #REF! #REF! #REF! O 2+3+4+5 * * Billable = Direct + OH 1IC-12-1s (rev. 6/01) 200 - 2005 PROJECT Submit this form to Contracts Department DIRECTIVE —a it r n: o CO S. -qOJECT NAME Benson Road South Improvements DATE iASE NAME Design PROJECT NC 10 ranc roF�jeci)f f1hase ,pup PROJECT MGR PHASE MGR CLIENT CHAMPION New Project New Phase Revision No, Contract Supplement No./Work Order No. CLIENT INFORMATION CLIENT NAME CONTACT TITLE ADDRESS (Street/P.O. Box) (City) (State) (Tap) NO. PHONE: CLIENT CONTRACT NO. (Acctg. Dept On10 FAX: CONTRACT INFORMATION Executed Contract/Supplement Rec'd Written Notice to Proceed Expiration (Date) (Date) (Date) Entranco is Prime Subconsultant Amount this Revision $ #REF! Total Phase Amount $ $ of this rev. let to subs $ 9,340.00 Promo No. If E is sub, total amount of Prime contract Previous Related Proj. #s. abor DistributionsGrp.# @ % Grp.# @ % Grp.# @ % = 100% Sales Credit to: Grp.# @ % Grp.# @ % Grp.# @ % = 100% PROJECT INFORMATION SCOPE OF SERVICES: (Note any unique features. If revision to existing project, provide new information only.) TEAM Milestone Dates: Quality Assurance Committee Members: Kick-off Meeting Date: APPROVED: Project Manager Branch Manager BRANCH NUMBERS: 10 = Bellevue; 30 = Phoenix; 40 = Tucson; 70 = Olympia; 80 = Boise; 85 = Helena DISTRIBUTION: Contract File, Project File, Accounting/ Invoice File, Marketing, Directives Notebook (Original), Client Champion PC-11 (Rev. 6/01) Project Name: Benson Road South Improvements Phase Name: Design Branch No.: 10 Project/Promo No.: Phase No.: Prepared by: AMH Date: Checked by: SRL ECD Date: 9/9/2004 9/3/2004 TOTALS (1) (4) (10) (20) (25) (1) (25) (35) (95) (51) (48) (75) (79) (85.87) (40) (94) (90) WORK HOURS/ Principal Proj. Mgr. 4 Proj. EngttSci Staff EnglSci EngySci AUTO CAD Engr/Sci Tech Edit Word Proc. CADD Graphic Illus. Sum Mgr Sum Og: L Survey Crew Res Mgr/Sr Mgr Ld Ted1Su Proj. Asst CODE TASK DOLLARS $68.37 $60.53 $35.16 $31.62 $28.71 $30.28 $24.39 $31.39 $24.23 $26.72 ......................: ::t i:cki:::::::is:: is i::::::2:................... ...........................:::::::::•..::::::::.... ::::.......:::......... ............................................................................ ::X. :::::.............:=::: i?::�::$: `>: Task 1: Project Management S Admin 26 2 12 12 1. QA/QC $1,183.74 $136.74 $726.36 $320.64 16 4 12 2. Project Invoicing $461.281 1 $140.64 1 $320.64 Task 2: Survey 80 16 64 $2,052.96 $502.246 $1,550.72 Task 3: Geotechnical Task 4: Utility Impact Assessment 8 8 1. Data Collection $229.68 $229.68 8 8 2. Utility Coordination $229.68 $229.68 1_ 12 4 8 3. Utility Impact Assessment and Alternative Evaluation $370.32 $140.64 $229.68 Task 5: Minor Improvements Reid Visit 16 8 8 $510.96 $281.28 $229.68 _ Task 6: Drainage Memorandum 12 12 - $421.92 $421 92 Task 7: Plans, Specifications, and Estimate 503 16 100 4 189 194 a. Benson Road South Ir provementsTitle and Index Sheet $14,768.81 1 $968.48 $3.516.001 $126.48 $5,426.19 $4,731.66 b. Minor Improvements at selected other locations in the City 64 48 16 - 1. Vciniry Map and Standard Plan Key $2,077.92 $1,687.68 - $390.246 47 c. Contract Provisions 70 16 40 10 4 $2,784.56 $968.48 $1.406.40 $302.80 1 $106.88 d. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 36 32 4 1. Benson Road South ltrprovements $1,232.00 $1,125.12 $106.88 16 16 2. Minor Improvements at selected otherlocatfons in the City $562.56 $562.56 e. Construction Critical Path Schedules 16 16 $562.561 $562.56 I. Submittals & Review Meetings 14 3 3 8 1. 30% Submittal $386.73 $105.48 $86.13 $195.12 14 3 3 8 2. 90%and 100%Submittal $386,73 $105.48 $86.13 $195.12 14 2 4 8 3. Final PS&E Submittal $380.28 1 $70.32 $114.84 $195.12 Task 8: Bidding Assistance 241 8 16 $740.64 $281.28 $459.36 Task 9: Permitting Assistance 16 8 8 $510.96 $281.28 $229.68 TOTALS 965 2 44 304 4 255 10 234 16 64 32 $29,854.29 5136.74 52,663.32 $10.688.64 $126.48 $7.321-05 - $302.80 $5,707.26 5502.24 E1550.72 $855.04 OUTSIDE REIMBURSABLES SUBCONSUTANTS INTERNAL RATE PAY ITEMS Direct Salary $29.654.29 Per Diem MILBOR-PITA $9.340.00 Mileage/El vehicle ($0.36/mle) Overhead 0 170.46 % $50,889.62 Lodging 'Enter Name' Subtotal $80,743.91 Mileage/pers. Vehicle ($0.36/mile) $25.00 - 'Enter Name' Travel 'Enter Name' Fee @ 16 % $12.919.03 Meals 'Enter Name' Outside Reimbursables $258.75 Supplies 'Enter Name' Subconsultants $10,741.00 Reproduction $100.00 'Enter Name Internal Rate Pay Items Telephone 'Enter Name' TOTAL. $104,662.69 Postage/Delivery $100.00 'Enter Name' Management Reserve Fund = 10% $10.466.27 Other 'Enter Name' GRANDTOTAL. $115,128.96 Markup for Reimb.= 15% $33.75 Markup = Is% $1,401.00 Total = $258.75 Total: $10,741.00 Rates as of 9/04 here,s�l�mh5lesrmaleweMbooknwvyrc. ew Printed: 9/9/2004 rev. 6/01 Qde4 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/DivBoard... City Clerk Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton SUBJECT: Bid opening on September 28, 2004, for CAG-04-119, Monster Road Bridge Repair Project EXHIBITS: Issue Paper TIP #7 & #8 Fund 317 February Allocations Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids Al11 #:° FOR AGENDA OF: October 4, 2004 AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee Finance Dept.... Other. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted........ Total Project Budget... $672,000 Transfer/Amendment. $500,000 (2004 Budget) Revenue Generated... City Share Total Proje SUMMARY OF ACTION: $160,000 The budget for the Monster Road Bridge Repair project is $500,000 in 2004, with an additional $12,000 programmed in 2005. To date, the Transportation Division has spent just under $110,000 with a projected total expenditure of $672,000, which includes construction, inspection services, staff time, and contingency to complete the project. More funds in the amount of $160,000 are needed to have sufficient budget to complete this project. The additional $160,000 required would come from the transfer of funds from the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study (2005-2010 TIP #8) and the Rainier Ave. Corridor Study (2005-2010 TIP #7), in the amount of $100,000 and $60,000 respectively, to the Monster Road Bridge Repair project account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following two criteria: There was more than one bid, and there were no irregularities. However, a transfer of funds is needed to increase the budget in order to have sufficient funds to complete this project. Therefore, staff recommends the transfer of $160,000 to the Monster Rd. Repair project budget. Additionally, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Mowat Construction Company in the amount of $449,800, CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 2004 TO: Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt, x7223 SUBJECT: Monster Road Bridge Repair Project ISSUE #1: The budget established for the Monster Road Bridge Repair in 2004 is $500,000 and $12,000 is programmed in 2005. To date, Transportation has spent just under $110,000 with a projected total expenditure of $672,000 that includes construction, inspection services, staff time, and contingency to complete the project. $160,000 more is needed to have sufficient budget to complete this project. The additional $160,000 required would come from the transfer of funds from the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study (2005-2010 TIP #8) and the Rainier Avenue Corridor Study (2005-2010 TIP #7) in the amount of $100,000 and $60,000, respectively, to the Monster Road Bridge Repair account. RECOMMENDATION #1: Staff recommends that Council and the Mayor authorize transferring $100,000 from the NE 3rd/41h Corridor Study and $60,000 from the Rainier Avenue Corridor Study to the Monster Road Bridge Repair Project totaling a $160,000 transfer. This would amend the 2004 budget up to a total of $672,000. BACKGROUND #1: Girder cracks on the Monster Road Bridge (noted during the mandatory Bridge Monitoring Program Review) threaten the investment the City has made by significantly reducing the useful life, use, and function of this bridge. To complete the repair of Monster Road Bridge and thereby restore full life, use, and function of the project, we require additional funding added to the budget in the amount of $160,000. A summary of the budget and expenditures to date, as well as estimated future expenditures follow: Monster Road Bridge Repair Project October 4, 2004 Page 2 $500,000 Budgeted for 2004 12,000 Budgeted for 2005 $512,000 Total Existing Programmed Budget $110,000 Expended to date 480,000 Contract with 7% contingency 70,000 Inspection services contract with INCA 12,000 Staff time $672,000 Total Estimated Future Expenditures Staff is requesting an additional $160,000 added to the Monster Road Bridge Project for 2004 to allow completion of the repairs and some contingency. It should also be noted that due to the structural and materials expertise required for the project, the City has hired outside inspection services with INCA Engineers. ISSUE #2: On September 29, 2004, five bids were opened and publicly read. There were no bid irregularities. The lowest bidder was the Mowat Construction Company with a bid of $449,800. The engineer's estimate was $432,039, for a difference of $17,761. The primary reason on why the lowest bid was higher than the engineer's estimate is due to the volatile steel prices within the United States. The bid bond for Mowat Construction has been verified as seen in the attached memo. RECOMMENDATION #2: Staff recommends that Council and the Mayor authorize the construction contract be awarded to the Mowat Construction Company in the amount of $449,800. BACKGROUND #2: During the 2003 mandatory bridge inspections, cracks were noticed in the girders of the Monster Road Bridge. This prompted a series of studies that forced the City to repair these cracks quickly. The work involved to repair the Monster Road Bridge will include the installation of high strength steel rods (slightly post tensioned) at the top and bottom of each girder, placement of corbels (shelf) at the bottom of each girder, and epoxy injection of the cracks to prevent steel corrosion. This work will be conducted beneath the bridge, allowing the City to keep the bridge open. Attachment: September 29, 2004 Memo to City Clerk L\Deputy Clerk\WINWORD\Misc\Issue Paper For Monster Road Bridge funding increase and award.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2005 - 2010 SIX -YEAR TIP Rainier Ave Corridor Study and Improvements Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12193 RANK: 7 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: Pre -engineering study to evaluate short-term and long-term traffic flow and safety improvements in this corridor. Included will be access controllconsolidation of driveways, potential for adding HOV lanes, and signing and intersection improvements., JUSTIFICATION: This is a critical corridor serving the central Renton area with existing operational problems and it is projected to experience severe congestion in the future. STATUS: The corridor study, initiated in 2003, is expected to be completed by early 2005, and to have evaluated potential improvements including those that will offer benefits to transit - increased speed, reliability, and ridership - as well as HOV and general purpose traffic safety improvements. CHANGES: A TIB grant awarded in 2003 has been split off from this study, reducing the funding by approximately $3.6 million. Funded : 13 87.710 1 Un-funded : 6 330 000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2005 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2004 2004 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Proiect Development 387,710 107,710 160 000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon En /Admin 541,000 541,000 241,000 300,000 R-O-W includes Admin 294,000 294,000 Construction Contract Fee 4,818,000 2,000,000 2,818,000 Construction En /Admin M6,717,710 677,000 350,000 327,000 Other TOTAL E PENSES SOURCEFUNDS: 107 710 160 000 6,450 000 20,000 20,000 20,000 261,000 2,964,000 3,165,000 1/2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 277,710 107,710 50 000 120,000 20,000 20.000 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 Grants In -Hand Miti ation In -Hand 110,000 110,000 L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed 6,330,0001 6,330,000 241,000 2,944,000 3,145,000 Undetermined ---W,717,7101 TOTAL SOURL%9 107,71010 0 0,002,964,00065. 0 07MV2006 RM AN 5-7 FINAL am bom um iM �M!11111 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9f1f15 - 9111f1 SIX-YFAR TIP NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor Improvements Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12176 RANK: 8 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: This project involves a series of key improvements in this corridor to improve traffic operations such as rechannelization and traffic signal modifications, possible construction of an eastbound hill -climbing lane from Monterey Ave to east of Edmonds Ave, possible transit priority signal treatments and possibly queue jumps. This project will seek to meet pedestrain, transit and bicycle needs. JUSTIFICATION: This corridor has a strong potential for transit usage and is experiencing rapid residential and retail growth. STATUS: The NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study was initiated in 2001 and will refine transportation needs in the corridor, as well as the costs of the improvements. Project scope increased in 2001 to address the needs of pedestrians, transit users and bicyclists, as well as the enhancement of the existing streetscape. CHANGES: Corridor study to be completed in 2004. Increased total project costs by $2.1 million to reflect initial cost estimates from draft study. Funde 11.846.692 n un e 8 7 000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2005 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed sent Pre-2004 2004 Total 2006 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Project Development 232,485 181,185 60,000 1 300 1 300 Precon En /Admin 231,207 2,707 90 000 138,500 100,000 38,500 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 9100 000 9100 000 192,500 744,000 4 663 500 1,800,000 1,800,000 Construction En /Admin 1,100,000 1,100,000 21,500 25,000 453,500 300.000 300,000 Other TOTAL EXPERM-910 6639692 183 892 140,000 10,339,800 316,300 807,600 5,017,000 2,100,000 2,100 000 SOURCE F FU 1 /2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 325,992 23,892 10,000 292100 100.000 92,1001 100,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 1,520,700 160,000 130 000 1,230,700 315,300 807,500 100 000 7 900 L.I.D's Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 8 817,000, 8,817,000 4,817,000 2,00 0001 2,000,000 TOTAL R S 10 663 692 183,8921 140,0001 10,339,800 1 777315 300 807 500 6,017,000 2,100,0001 2,100, 000 NEk�,NE�T 07RE M i]t AM 5.8 FINAL aReallocations are bD23rd. pproval F Transportation Division Fund 317 Using the February Reallocations Budgeted 004 Spending % of Reallocation * through Plan 8/31/2004 SDen Annual Balance Notes DESIGN 1 Street Overlay Program Bill 12108 430,600 33,067 397.533 3 Strander Design Rob 12239 1,080,000 617,703 462,297 4 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR9002 Rob 12175 1,250,000 106,178 1,143,822 Includes $1.2 M Metro mitigation. 10 S Lake Washington Rdwy Im rov. Rob 12306 1,500,000 431,222 1,068,778 16 Rainier Av - S 7th St to S 4th PI Jason 12308 80,000 913 79,087 17 Benson Rd Ped - S 26th to Main 2 Jason 12309 170,000 894 169,106 Includes $150k M.M.; split yrs. In TIP. 19 Bridge Pro ram Jason 106 80,000 74,616 5,384 27 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 2 James 12186 303,500 0 303,500 Includes $200k Metro mitigation funds. 28 Duvall Av NE James 12123 500,000 250,837 249,163 29 Sunset/DuvallIntersection James 12301 115,000 92,028 22,972 33 Missing Links Ran P. 12106 30,000 26,886 3,114 37 Lake Wash. Bv: Park -Coulon James 12121 15,000 381 14,619 39 Environmental Monitoring Jason 12187 100,000 53,920 46,080 47 Logan Av N Concrete Panel Repair James 12303 0 0 51 Houser Wy S-Main Av S to Burnett James 12213 0 0 53 Lake Wash. Bv. Slip Plane Jason 12302 600,000 55,004 544,996 54 Monster Rd Bride Jason 12307 500, 80,289 419,711 7,655 55 SW 7th St - Lind Av SW Signal Jason 12153 230-,000 222,345 56 Duvall Av NE - King County James 12305 500,000 244,995 255,005 Out Oakesdale Avenue SW Phase 2 Jason 121821 0 0 Out Logan Av Seismic Retrofit Jason 122011 2,500 2,142 358 Out Grady Wy Approach at Rainier Av Rob 12212 5,000 2,836 2,164 ,Design Total $ 7,491,600 $ 2,296,255 $5,195,345 Spending Plan Target $ 3,691,905 62.2% OPERATIONS 12 South Renton Project Bob 12194 135,000 18,081 116,919 15 NE 4th St/Ho uiam Av NE Bob 12209 55,100 27,267 27,833 20 Loop Replacement Program Dave 16 20,000 0 20,000 21 1 Sign Replacement Program Dave 12113 7,500 0 7,500 Li ht Pole Relacement Po ram Dave 91 45,000 14,735 30,265 Traffic Safe Pro ram Karl 12115 109,100 3,754 105,346 t2530 Traffic Efficien Pro ram Karl 12162 167,500 57,301 110,199 RR Crossin Safe Pro ram Karl 12166 5,000 182 4,818 Interagency Signal Coord. Karl 12140 12,000 0 12,000 46 Benson Rd S / S 31st St Bob 12129 138,500 0 138,500 49a Transit Priority Bob 12174 678,900 409,929 268,971 49b ISR 900 HOV Houser I Bob 32 01 1 0 9/9/2004 1:lsgdffin\budget12004\Reallocations-Expenditures through July C*Reall!ocations aD23rd. s approva Transportation Division Fund 317 Using the February Reallocations CQ--iocOioO /1 b��J J C�� Budgeted Reallocation * oo 004 Spending through 8/31/2004 % of Plan Spent Annual Balance Notes TIP # Program P.M. I Proj. A 50 Transit Center Video Karl 12208 000 0 10,000 52 Trans -Valley ITS Karl 12211 50,000 0 50,000 Operations Total $ 1,433,600 $ 531,249 $ 902,351 Spending Plan Target $ 890,789 59.6% PLANNING 2 SR167/SW 27th St/Strander By Keith 12138 2,600 0 2,600 5 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) Nate 12163 5,000 658 4,342 6 Transit Program Nate 12109 400 6,910 13,490 7 1 Rainier Av Corridor Study & Im rov. Nate 12193 45,674 114,326 8 NE 3rd/4th Corridor Keith 12176 140,000 11,885 128,115 9 Walkway Program Jason/Dan 9 416,050 15,169 400,831 Includes $166k M.M.; split yrs. In TIP. 13 1-405 Improvements in Renton Keith 12210 20,000 12,059 7,941 14 Project Dev. & Predesi n Sharon 12150 175,000 57,130 117,870 18 Arterial Circulation Program Keith 29 100,000 91,667 8,333 23 Sound Transit Direct Access Keith 12171 20,000 12,132 7,868 26 CBD Bike and Ped. Connection Dan 12185 25,000 25,082 -82 31 TDM Program Nate 12135 64,200 43,407 20,793 32 Trans Concurrency Keith 12107 47 -47 34 GIS Needs Assessment Nate 12206 _ 35,000 13,510 21,490 35 Grady Way Corridor Nate 12127 5,000 0 5,000 36 Bicycle Route Dev. Program Dan 12173 20,000 8,329 11,671 40 Trans -Valle & Soos Crk. Corr. Keith 12191 3,000 95 2,905 41 WSDOT Coord. Program Sharon 12146 10,000 6,799 3,201 42 1% for the Arts Sharon 12112 20,000 3,278 16,722 43 Arterial HOV Program Keith 12160 3,000 0 3,000 44 Park -Sunset Corridor Improv. Keith 12177 2,000 5,239 -3,239 45 Lind Av - SW 16th - SW 43rd Keith 24 5,000 0 5,000 48 S Carr Rd / Mill Av S Keith 12304 0 0 Out Lake Wash. Bv: Coulon - NE 44th Dan 12205 0 0 Planning Total $ 1,251,200 $ 359,070 1 $ 892,130 Spending Plan Target $ 674,306 53.3% TOTAL $ 10,176,400 $ 3,186,574 $ 6,989,826 Spending Plan Target $ 5,257,000 1 60.6% I Each Section's spending plan amount is based on their budget allocation ratio prior to the addition of some of the Metro mitigation funds. 2 Metro mitigation funding is now shown as allocated in 2004 per Eden. See TIP for distribution of funds over 2004 & 2005. 3 $500k of Metro mitigation funds are in reserve, potentially for the Strander Design project, bringing total allocation to $10,676,400 for all projects. 9/9/2004 1:lsgdffinlbudgett2004\Reallocations-Expenditures through July 2 Project Title: Monster Road Bridge Repair BID DATE: September 28, 2004 Item No. Description Unit 1 Mobilization L.S. 2 Traffic Control L.S. 3 Girder Deck Reinforcement L.S. 4 Bottom Flange Reinforcement L.S. 5 Girder Support Brackets L.S. 6 Girder Epoxy Injection L.F. 7 Non -Destructive Testing L.S. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Est. Quantity City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Bid Price Amount Advanced Unit Price 1 43,529.00 43,529.00 70,000.00 1 8,000.00 8,000.00 30,000.00 1 149, 926.00 149, 926.00 120, 000.00 1 71,244.00 71,244.00 120,000.00 1 139,400.60 139,400.00 185,740.00 180 83.00 14,940.00 150.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub Total 432,039.00 8.8% Tax Total 1 432,039.00 action ;;KLM Consfruction; Bid Urnt Bid Amount Price Amount, ; 70,000.00 40 0 00 '=1440 000 00'°' 30;000.00 2 500 00 2 500 OOti 120,000.00 175 000 00 175 000 00 120,000.00 134°1�1�100r 1341110,0? 185,740.00 85y000 00 85 000 00; 27,000.00 65 00 11 700 00 10,000.00 6 000 00 6 0 00 0.00 a:`0.00:: 0.00 0.00. 0.00 ry 0 ;00 ; 0.00 bw 562,740.00 454,311.00 562,740.001 454.311.00 PCT Unit Bid OOA 000`00 8`00000. 50,327.00 50,327.00 5000 00 397,545.00 397,545.00 146,974.00 146,974.00 t 000.00' 153 000.001 186,435.00 186,435.00 0 2:00 2960 00,, 74.78 13,460.40 27,325.00 27,325.00 0 0 OQj 0.00 0 00 11:00; 0.00 0 r 000: 0.00 G00 a OOOi 0.00 449,800.00 1 835,960.001 907,057.40 907,057.40 The submitted bid was 907,057.00. There was a iultiplication error with bid item 5. This is a difference of 0.40 Brits above the bid total written in ie schedule of prices. CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: Monster Road Bridge Repair; CAG-04-119 DATE: September 28, 2004 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Addendum Advanced Construction, Inc. X X X $562,740.00 12322 Hwy. 99, Suite #104 Everett, WA 98204 A.J. Smith KLM Construction, Inc. X X X $454,311.00 1011 East Main, Suite 301 Puyallup, WA 98372 Daniel Casey Mowat Construction Company X X X $449,800.00 PO Box 1330 Woodinville, WA 98072 John P. Sandstrom N. A. Degerstrom, Inc. X X X $835,960.00 PO Box 425 Spokane, WA 99210-0425 Michael D. Cannon PCT Construction, Inc. X X X $907,057.00 7400 3rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Teresa Rancourt ENGNEER'S ESTIMATE LEGEND: Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage TOTAL: $432,039.00 From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: North Renton Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: Re: North Renton Truck Traffic Dear Mr. Zwicker: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for their review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "North Renton" <northrenton @ msn.com> 9/28/2004 5:08:14 PM >>> Per Councilmember Palmer's suggestions below, attached is a letter from the North Renton Neighborhood Association regarding truck traffic in the North Renton area. Please let me know if you have any questions or if we can be of any assistance. Richard Zwicker President, North Renton Neighborhood Association ----- Original Message ----- From: Marcie Palmer<mailto:MPalmer@ci.renton.wa.us> To: Citizens to Council Via Clerk<mailto:Council@ci.renton.wa.us> ; NorthRenton @ msn.com<mailto:North Renton @ msn.com> Cc: ALaulainen@ Ikwash.wednet.edu<mailto:ALaulainen@ Ikwash.wednet.edu> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:53 AM Subject: Re: North Renton Truck Traffic Rich, Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you on this issue. There are a lot of things that you learn when you become a public official. One of the major things is that correct notification has to be made for public meetings. It is a very complicated process which I will be happy to explain to you in more detail if you'd like at another time. But, for now, I would like to forward this to the administration to try to resolve first. If you could forward some more concrete information to the Council e-mail address, such as exact location and the times of day that it appears to be an issue, and perhaps some of your ideas, we can use this electronic correspondence as a way to make a formal referral. If, for some reason, this does not address your concerns, let me know and we can then make a formal referral to the Transportation Committee. After it has been formally referred to the Committee and scheduled by staff on the committee agenda, you will be notified of the meeting date and time. Thank you for being so proactive for your community. Sincerely, Marcie >>> "North Renton" <NorthRenton@msn.com<mailto:North Renton@msn.com>> 8/27/04 5:13:58 PM Marcie, the North Renton Neighborhood Association has been contacted by concerned neighbors regarding truck traffic through our neighborhood that appears to be in violation of City ordinance. They have presented various proposals to the NRNA that are sound and worthy of consideration. I would like to discuss this matter with the Transportation Committee. The NRNA is considering taking a proactive approach to these traffic concerns and I would like the Committee to offer their insight, comments, assistance(?) and hopefully its blessing. Also, I think it is important that we coordinate our efforts and keep the committee apprised of this issue and our proposed actions. Is there a way to get on the agenda for the next committee meeting? Should I just propose something in writing? Your expertise would be appreciated. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rich Zwicker, President North Renton Neighborhood Association Visit Our Webpage at: www.geocities.com/northrenton<hftl)://www.geocities.com/northrenton<http://www.geocities.com/northrent on<hftp://www.geocities.com/northrenton>> This message has been scanned by the City of Renton's filtering gateway. NORTH RENTON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION POST OFFICE BOX 326 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 (20) 931-6356 NORTHRENTON MSN.COM WWW.GEOCITIES.com/NORTHRENTON September 29, 2004 Renton City Council and City Staff Via E-Mail Re: Truck Traffic in North Renton Dear Sirs/Madam: It is not our intention that this be read into the record, because it is too long for that. But we would like the City to review our concerns regarding truck traffic in the North Renton neighborhood. It is a goal of the North Renton Neighborhood Association ("NRNA") to work to preserve the unique characteristics of our neighborhood and maintain a reasonable quality of life while working in concert with the City to achieve these goals. We are an optimistic and hard- working group, and we offer these concerns, and solutions, in that spirit. Our concern is the ever-present truck traffic traveling on Park Avenue, North Fourth and North Third. It appears these concerns have previously been addressed and codified. We direct you to Renton Municipal Code 10-12-26 which reads: TRUCK ROUTES: A. Designated Truck Routes: Trucks over twenty six thousand (26,000) pounds gross vehicle weight are restricted to operating over one of the following designated truck routes when traveling within the City: Rainier Avenue N. and S.; S. and S.W. Grady Way; Main Avenue S. between Grady Way S. and Bronson Way S.; Airport Way; N. 6th Street between Logan Avenue N. and Park Avenue N.; Park Avenue N. and N.E. Park Drive between Bronson Way N. and Sunset Boulevard. N.E.; N.E. Sunset Boulevard; Sunset Boulevard N.; Duvall Avenue, N.E.; N.E. 3rd Street; N.E. 4th Street east of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; Maple Valley Highway; Benson Drive S.; S.W. Sunset Boulevard; Bronson Way N.; Houser Way S. between Main Avenue S. and Bronson Way N.; Logan Avenue N. between Airport Way and N. 6th Street; S. 2nd Street; S. 3rd Street. Trucks which need to make deliveries off the designated routes shall take the most direct arterial route to or from one of the designated truck routes when making their deliveries. When more than one delivery off the designated truck routes can be combined so as to limit multiple intrusions into residential neighborhoods, then there is an obligation to combine such trips. This Section shall not apply to buses operated by the Renton School District, other schools, or other public or charitable institutions on designated routes, public transit on designated routes, garbage trucks, City maintenance vehicles and emergency vehicles. B. Penalty: Violation of this Section shall be a traffic infraction. (Ord. 4328, 10-21-91) RICI-IARD ZWICKER PRESIDENT • SUSANNAH DOUGHERTY, VICE-PRESIDENT • AARON PETERSON, SECRETARY/TREASURER DIRECTORS: PAM CHICOINE • LEE CHICOINE • LORI GIOME'I'rI • MIKE O'DONIN • MELINDA WEBB • PAUL WEBB NORTH RENTON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION City of Renton Re: Truck Traffic Issues ,ptember 29, 2004 _ age 2 Neighborhood residents have logged and calendared considerable truck traffic on North Third Street and North Fourth Street between Sunset and Logan. In addition, it appears that there is also considerable truck traffic on Park Avenue North between Bronson and North Sixth. This truck traffic appears to be a violation of RMC 10-12-26. To address the current problem, combat the worsening of the situation and to take a proactive approach to future development of the Boeing properties, the NRNA asks for the City to consider implementing the following: 1. Clearly marking neighborhood entry points with "Truck Route" signs. Currently, the only neighborhood "Truck Route" sign that directs traffic away from the neighborhood is located on Logan as it splits into North Third. This sign should be augmented with permanent wooden day-glo orange "flags" to increase visibility. Also, we have identified two additional areas that need entry "Truck Route" signs: Southbound on Park Avenue at North Sixth (light arrow) and on I- 405 (or on the signal poles of Sunset) coming down Cemetery Road (left arrow). (We believe that effective truck routing requires signs throughout the City (on Rainier, South Third, etc.), but for these purposes our focus is on the North Renton neighborhood). 2. Creating "Trucks Over 26,000 GVW Prohibited" signs to be installed by volunteers of the NRNA on the existing NRNA "Welcome to North Renton Neighborhood" signs at Park and North Fifth; Burnett and North Third; and Houser and North Fourth; and other areas as necessary. We understand that only trucks that have already violated RMC 10-12-26 could actually see these signs, but as stated above, we're an optimistic group and believe the trucks will see the error of their ways and correct their behavior in the future. 3. Having Renton Police Traffic Division monitor and increase enforcement in these areas. 4. Creating a map of the North Renton/Downtown corridor that outlines the truck routes and can be distributed, along with a copy of the Code, to new businesses as part of business version "New Resident Package" if such version exists or have these documents distributed in some other way to new and existing North Renton and Downtown businesses. 5. Creating a "Truck Route" link on the City of Renton homepage (perhaps best listed under the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning section and in the Site Index) that explains RMC 10-12-26 and links to the map as referenced above. 6. Reminding local businesses of the Truck Route designation in the City of Renton "City Source" section in the Renton Reporter on an annual basis. 7. Amending RMC 10-12-26 to include the Houser Way spur as a recognized truck route. RICHARD ZWICKER PRESIDENT • SUSANNAH DOUGHERTY VICE-PRESIDENT • AARON PETERSON, SECRETARY/TREASURER DIRECTORS: PAM CHICOINE • LEE CHICOINE • LORI GIOMEITI • MIKE O'DONIN • MELINDA WEBB • PAUL WEBB NORTH RENTON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION City of Renton Re: Truck Traffic Issues ptember 29, 2004 _age3 After the items listed above are addressed, members of the NRNA or the City should periodically monitor and record truck traffic through the neighborhood on North Third, North Fourth and Park Avenue. If the problems persist and if repeat offenders can be identified in the monitoring, the City or NRNA should notify offending businesses and supply a copy of the Code and the traffic map. We consider these to be reasonable requests and they reflect our commitment to a dynamic working relationship between the NRNA and the City. We thank you for your consideration and look forward to your favorable response. Please let us know if you need additional information or assistance. Sincerely, Is/Rich Zwicker Richard D. Zwicker President North Renton Neighborhood Association RICHARD ZWICKER PRESIDENT • SUSANNAH DOUGHERTY VICE-PRESIDENT • AARON PETERSON, SECRETARY/TREASURER DIRECTORS: PAM CHICOINE • LEE CHICOINE • LORI GIOMETTI • MIKE O'DONIN • MELINDA WEBB • PAUL WEBB From: Jacqueline Charles Spears <JSpears@costco.com> To: "'Citizens to Council Via Clerk"' <Council@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2004 1:17 PM Subject: RE: speed bump in my neighborhood Thank you, I hope something will be done... Jackie Charles -Spears Flight Scheduler Costco Flight Department (425)313-6119 (ph) (425)427-7291 (fax) Jspears@costco.com From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Jacqueline Charles Spears Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2004 1:11 PM Subject: Re: speed bump in my neighborhood Dear Ms. Spears: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for their review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Jacqueline Charles Spears <Jspears@costco.com> 9/28/2004 11:14:19 AM >>> I live on NE 23rd PI in Renton, Harrington is a side street that is frequently used to cut through to my street to end up on Edmonds. Night after night I here, cars screeching by and speeding through the neighborhood. I have young children, who I do not allow to play even in the front of my house without my direct supervision because of the speed of the traffic as I am so afraid of a car either, 1 hitting them or 2 coming around the corner with such speed that they flip over. I would like to see if we can either get a speed bump, stop sign or something so that the traffic can slow down. I did mention this to Randy who lives close by to me, so I am hoping that since I am opening this up to all county council members that something can be done. Regards Jacqueline spears 2713 NE 23rd pi Renton 425-271-8790 Renton City Council 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Dear Mayor Keolker-Wheeler and City Council Members: le-yay September 21, 2004�% CITY OF REH Te RECEIVED CITY I am requesting your permission to connect to the City of Renton sewer. I am planning on building one, single family home on an individual building lot located at 154XX SE 132°d St, Renton (Lot 4, Cedar Crest Estates). For any questions you may have, please call at your convenience. Thank you, Kevin M Wyman Attachment: Sanitary Sewer Availability form (copy) KEVIN M WYMAN 16540 SE 149TH ST RENTON WA 98059 (206) 419-0319 SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CITY OF RENTON 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: (425) 430-7200 Fax: (425) 430-7300 TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT: Applicant's Name: Mailing Address: Date of Request - C� Phone No. IV62 City State !/ Zip Code S� Check one: Proposed Single Family Home Existing Single Family Home On Septic Other (Specific) — Location/Address: . 5 `-/x ,ice S o2 ^-� King County Tax Account No: j z1(% — rly ` O Legally Described as: THIS APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A COPY OF THE PROPOSED SITE/PLOT PLAN. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY: ❑ Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer main located within or ❑ ❑ 2 City records show a side sewer stub to the property ❑ Y ❑ N Sanitary sewer service will require an extension of approximately of 6e/ size sewer main located within -::!� The proposed development lies within applicant shall contact The, District/Agency at See attached letter dated Payment of all applicable system development fees: (Fees are subject to change without notice) - System Development Charge: - Residential building sewer permit: - Latecomers, s ec�al assessment fees: i�aC/��L7 - Right of Way Fee - Right f Way Bond (Refundable) y— service area; therefore, the (phone) for sewer availability. $ 900 per single family residence $ 60 per single family residence (over) Sanitary Sewer Availability Form Page 2 3. 4. ❑ 5. or ❑ 8. or ❑ or ❑ Reference data Applicant shall abandon the existing septic system in accordance wttn '>ection 1 1151 01 u1e cuncut Uniform Plumbing Code and Section 4-6-040.1.6 of the City Code. Customers making a first time connection to sanitary sewers in King County, including Renton's Sewer Service Area, are subject to a sewage treatment capacity charge. The purpose of this King County charge is to pay for building sewage treatment capacity to serve newly connected customers. Single- family customers pay $17.60 a month (billed by King County as $105.60 every six months) for 15 years. At the customer's choice, this fee may be paid to King County as a lump sum of $1,826.04. This fee is in addition to the monthly charge for treatment that Renton is required to collect and pass to King County. The Renton portion of the Wastewater Utility Rates for customers outside the city limits is 1.5 times the standard rate for customers inside the city limits. (City Code section 8-5-15C) The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City of Renton or has been granted King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval for extension of service outside the City.. Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary for the provision of sanitary sewer service. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. The sewer system improvement will require an amendment to the Renton Long -Range Wastewater Management Plan. The sewer system improvement will be within an existing franchise from King County allowing the installation of facilities in the County Right(s)-of Way. The sewer system improvement will require that Renton obtain a franchise from King County to install the facilities in the County Right(s)-of Way. CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION: 1) It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to verify, by an engineering study, whether it is possible to connect by gravity line to the existing City sewer system (a private lift station may be installed, but is not desirable). The City may require, at it's option, the verification to be in the form of a letter signed by a professional civil engineer. 2) When new sanitary sewer lines are installed, the City typically installs or requires to have installed stub -outs to the property line. This is done as a courtesy to the property owners. The City does not guarantee a stub for all properties nor does it guarantee the condition or location of the stub. It is the responsibility of the owner/contractor to have an approved connection from the building sewer to the City's sewer main. If there is a stub, it is in good condition, and the owner/contractor can locate it, then it is available for use. The determination of condition of existing sanitary sewer stubs shall be the sole responsibility of the City and the City's decision shall be final. If the stub is broken or the City inspector determines that the stub's condition is not acceptable, it shall be the owner/contractor's responsibility to repair the stub, replace the stub at the existing tee, or to install a new stub and tee directly into the main. ethod o epair/replacement to be determined by the City's inspector. I hereby c th�hbove ,rtary sewe inf ati n is true. This certification shall be vali for one year from date ofe. (Feetpien is subject toy e w' out notice). t ame Wastewater Utility Section Rentonnet DC9054001 12103 bh 9054001 DOC September 18, 2004 Kathy Koker Wheeler, Mayor City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mayor Wheeler and City Council Members: RECEIVE0 ue.ogf oo7 SEP 2 2 2004 CITY OF Rr-. i 4Tt: N I am writing to request your permission to extend the sewer line to my property located at 154XX SE 132" Street, Renton, Washington (Lot #3, Cedar Crest Estates). This will require 320 feet of additional sewer line to reach my property. I understand the costs associated with this extension are my responsibility. If you have any questions concerning my request, please contact me at (425) 255-9540. Thank you for your consideration and assistance with my request. Sin ly, h D.E. Blood 3711 Park Avenue North Renton, Washington 98056 (425) 255-9540 cc: John Hobson Wastewater Utility Section SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ECITY OF CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED � REN70N 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 E I V E D 40 Phone: (425) 430-7200 �� ¢5 Fax: (425) 430-7300 AUG 10 2001 BUILDING D TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT: Date of Request Applicant's Name: D rZ lzrad Aye l Phone No. Mailing Address: J 7-% / Pa r /'f k ye /(/ �T City -Ke' n Z 61 State l t4' / Zip Code Check one: Proposed Single Family Home_ Existing Single Family Home On Septic Other (Specify) Location/Address: King County Tax Account No: Legally Described as: La 3 THIS APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A COPY OF THE PROPOSED SIMPLOT PLAN. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY: 0 O Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer main located within City records show aside. sewer stub to the property O Y ON or O Sanitary sewer service will require an extension of approximately _ 32o of +• size sewer main located within J f- 2.L->57r�OSTI .4/ c , rr- Mys AtxSoI�1`t-S���►+.tr��.t t—' ,,->' or O The proposed development lies within applicant shall contact The District/Agency at See attached letter dated Payment of all applicable system development fees: (Fees are subject to change without notice) - System Development Charge: - Residential building sewer permit: - Latecomers, special assessment fees: - Right of Way Fee - Right of Way Bond (Refundable) service area; therefore, the (phone) for sewer availability. S 900 per single family residence S 60 per single family residence $ ZL t-fizv�� `.vtrsi $ $ $ (over) Sanitary Sewer Availability Form Page 2 3. ❑ Reference data 4. ❑ Applicant shall abandon the existing septic system in accordance with Section 1119 of the current Uniform Plumbing Code and Section 4-6-040.1.E of the City Code. 5. Customers making a first dme connection to sanitary sewers in King County, including Renton's Sewer \ Service Area; are subject to a sewage treatment capacity charge. The purpose of this King County charge is to pay for building sewage treatment capacity to serve newly connected customers. Single- family customers pay $17.60 a month (billed by King County as $105.60 every six months) for 15 years. At the customer's choice, this fee may be paid to King County as a lump sum of $1,826.04. This fee is in addition to the monthly charge for treatment that Renton is required to collect and pass to King County. 6. The Renton portion of the Wastewater Utility Rates for customers outside the city limits is 1.5 times the `1 standard rate for customers inside the city limits. (City Code section 8-5-15C) 7. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the City of Renton or has been granted King 111 County Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval for extension of service outside the City.. or ❑ Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary for the provision of sanitary sewer service. 8. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. or ❑ The sewer system improvement will require an amendment to the Renton Long -Range Wastewater Management Plan. 9. ❑ The sewer system improvement will be within an existing franchise from King County allowing the installation of facilities in the County Rigbt(s)-of Way. or ❑ The sewer system improvement will require that Renton obtain a franchise from King County to install the facilities in the County Rigbt(s)-of Way. CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION: l) It is the responsibilityof the owner/developer to verify, by an engineering study, whether it is possible to connect by gravity line to the existing City sewer system (a private lift station may be installed, but is not desirable). The City may require, at its option, the verification to be in the form of a letter signed by a professional civil engineer. 2) When new sanitary sewer lines are installed, the City typically installs or requires to have installed stub -outs to the property line. This is done. as a courtesy to the property owners. The City does not guarantee a stub for all properties nor does it guarantee he condition or location of the stub. It is the responsibility of the owner/contractor to have an approved connection from the building sewer to the City's sewer main. If there is a stub, it is in good condition, and the owner/contractor can locate it, then it is available for use. The determination of condition of existing sanitary sewer stubs shall be the sole responsibility of the City and the City's decision shall be final. If the stub is broken or the City inspector determines that the stub's condition is not acceptable, it shall be the owner/contractor's responsibility to repair the stub, replace the stub at the existing tee, or to install a new stub and tee directly into the main. The method of repair/replacement to be determined by the City's inspector. I hereby certify that the above sanitary sewer information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. (Fee information is subject to change without notice). Lt- I . 4-2:5— Sign6t6fy Name Wastewater Utility Section fd t7 �yt; Date 9054001.DOC Rentonnet DC9054001 12/03 bh From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: John Warum Date: Fri, Oct 1, 2004 3:03 PM Subject: Re: Street Name Change Costs Dear Mr. Warum: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 gala toN mo� Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers. >>> "Warum, John" <john.warum@siemens.com> 10/1/2004 2:49:27 PM >>> I have been asked to provide an estimate of the costs that will be incurred should SW 41st Street be changed to SW IKEA Way. To accurately tabulate these costs before Monday's council meeting is not possible. However, my best estimate is in the area of $2,500 to $4,000 and would include sales literature, business cards, stationary items, letter postage to inform our customers/vendors, signage, certificates of insurance and other similar items. This cost does not cover the Siemens employee labor costs to implement the above changes It also does not cover the employee labor costs to notify different government agencies that administer our business licenses such as UBI, Electrical Contractor License, Engineering License, etc. We will also need to notify our fleet vehicle administrator to update insurance and license renewal data. All Siemens business software programs will need updating to reflect the address change. We would appreciate if the Renton City Council and Mayor would consider alternate proposals that would provide significant reward for IKEA's generosity without impacting other businesses in the area that also contribute to the community. You are in a position to make this favorable to all parties. Thanks in advance for your efforts to find a workable solution for all those being affected. John Warum Siemens Service Operations Mgr. 405 SW 41 st Street Renton, WA. 98055 425-656-4384 email: John.Warum@Siemens.com From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: mike caldwell Date: Fri, Oct 1, 2004 3:01 PM Subject: Re: POSSIBLE STREET NAME CHANGE Dear Ms. Caldwell: Thank you for your e-mail to the Renton City Council Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 a4,(,-w &MX410,en k"�`t ro/y/Zook Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers. >>> "mike caldwell" <cmcaldwell@hotmail.com> 10/1/2004 2:16:44 PM >>> Council Members & Mayor: I am pleased to see that there is continuing communication occuring regarding the name change of SW 41st Street. We believe that it is NOT IN THE INTEREST OF THE COMMUNITY to change the name. It sets a precendent that will only raise many more questions about renaming other streets to business names. You can say that the business has to "contribute" to the city, but in actuality you are saying the business has to BUY it's new street name. How much does that cost???? Speaking of costs ---below are some figures on how much it will cost our business to handle the name change of our business: Business cards $ 195.84 Envelopes 430.64 Checks 223.76 Labels 255.00 Shipping Labels 350.00 Mailings for notification 180.95 Sales Orders/Invoices 991.38 Advertising/promotion 4,524.80 Total $ 7, 152.37 The advertising cost includes the yellow page advertising which has just been printed. The time and effort to change business license addresses, corporation papers, etc. is a unknown entity at this time. However, it will require considerable follow up and documentation to implement. This is time that is not allocated for at this time and hard to guage amount. Once again, three things are brought to mind regarding this possible name change:: It is wrong to name streets after businesses (what happens to that name when the business moves or closes?); IKEA's address IS NOT EVEN ON THE STREET YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE NAME TO; and you are not even considering the many other businesses on the street and the costs they will incur. Thank you for the time you have taken to read this email. I hope that the council will re-evaluate their decision and NOT CHANGE THE NAME!! Jill Davis Capital Lighting Co., Inc. 10/'iI2,00� From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Vicki Harris Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 6:57 PM Subject: Re: SW 41 st Street vs Ikea Way Dear Ms. Harris: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Vicki Harris" <vickiharris427@msn.com> 10/4/20041:51:10 PM >>> Dear Council Members: As co-owner of The Copier Source, at 225 SW 41st Street, it will cost my company about $2500 for you to put in this street name change. This includes the cost of letterhead, advertising, brochures, mailing labels, envelopes, business cards, etc. etc. etc, and all the labor involved with ordering, storing, changing, contacting the various state and licensing agencies. We have nothing against IKEA, however, the City of Renton's arrogance and utter lack of respect and regard for small business owners is galling. Your alleged "surprise" about this whole sorry mess reflects how out of touch you are with your own town. Until now, I bet none of you had any idea, nor cared, how many businesses were even located on SW 41 st. Well guess what? It's your JOB to know. Before you come up with another brilliant plan like this, try doing your homework first. You decided to change the name to IKEA Way before you bothered to contact any of the businesses. You would not permit any of us to have input in your little meetings. And now you express "surprise" that events have turned out the way they have. You've embarrassed IKEA and greatly annoyed the SW 41 st Street business owners. As for the City of Renton, you now have about as much credibility as Dan Rather and CBS News. Why don't you change the name of that street between SW 41 st and SW 43rd and call IT IKEA Way? If you persist in changing the name to IKEA Way, we will bill the City of Renton for our costs. Finance charges and late fees will apply. Vicki Harris The Copier Source 225 SW 41 st Street Renton, WA 98055 (425) 251-8929 AAgG�(lW� Iolglz-oo t From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: R DAVID JACKSON Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 6:57 PM Subject: Re: Renaming of S. 41st to IKEA Way Dear Mr. Jackson: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "R DAVID JACKSON" <RDJ2004C MSN.COM> 10/4/2004 3:24:26 PM >>> Dear Renton City Council Members: I'm writing to express my disagreement with your decision to rename 41st to IKEA Way. I'm urging each of to carefully consider your vote on this matter, as it impacts a number of business negatively, and will result in excessive costs to them. This change of street name amounts to a "handout" of free advertising to IKEA from the City of Renton. When did it become City .business to promote a private business? When did it become part of the City mission to change street names to recognize a large tax payer in the City of Renton? I have no doubt that IKEA has been a good corporate citizen for the community, and they obviously deserve some recognition in that regard. How about a plaque? Perhaps hang a picture of IKEA's president in the halls of City Hall? In any event, I suggest that you not waste tax payers money on new street signs, and please understand that IKEA is pushing the renaming of streets where their business resides on a national and international basis, for good reason - it's free advertising. Renton does not owe this kind of substantial "gift" to any corporation or business within it's City limits. If the Council should decide to rename the street, then I suggest you consider renaming other streets in Renton including changing Grady Way to Sound Way (to honor the Sound dealerships), renaming streets around the Boeing plant to "Boeing Way", renaming Benson Road to "Sam's Drive" in honor of Sam's Club (they must bring in a ton of taxes to the City). You could even rank the corporations and business by their tax benefit to the City, and then rename streets accordingly. Do the right thing -- reject this nonsensical idea. Thank you. David Jackson 2419 Talbot Crest Drive S. Renton, WA 98055 &kd �4�4�ma t9/y/goy From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Steve Grand Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 6:59 PM Subject: Re: Taneum Expenses Related to IKEA Dear Mr. Grand: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> Steve Grand <steve@taneum.com> 10/4/2004 3:41:41 PM >>> Gentlemen: Attached is a summary of our estimated expenses related to a proposed street name change on SW 41 st Street. Please reconsider the renaming of this street as it has a considerable impact on our business finacially. Thank you for your consideration. Steve Grand Taneum Computer Products, Inc. 243 SW 41 st Street Renton, WA 98055 425/251-0711 Ms. Kristine M. Martin July 30, 2004 KG Investment Management 249 SW 41" Street, Suite K Renton, WA 98055 Dear Kristine, In reference to your request that we compile the cost of changing our address, we submit the following estimate: 1. Taneum Web Site COST $500.00 - All PDF literature and "Home" information must be changed, including revising the documents themselves. 2. Printed Literature COST $4,050.00 - Revise text 9 versions @ $150.00 - Artwork and printing 9 versions @$300.00 3. Stationery - Envelopes Window & Closed Face@ $750.00 9 x 12 @ $400.00 - Letterhead & Artwork @ $450.00 4. Business Cards - 8 artwork and printing revisions @ $250.00 5. Customer Notification —1,600 Customers - Postage @ $.037 - Letterhead, envelopes. & production @$.30 6. Software Program Revisions - Invoices, Packing Slips, Credit Notes, POs COST $1,600.00 COST $2,000.00 COST $1,072.00 COST $2,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $11,222.00 Naturally, there are other costs that have a significant value to Taneum Computer Products, Inc. including but not limited to the image of being somehow connected to IKEA even in the way it is being proposed. Of course we object vehemently to this change. We will expect full and total compensation for the above specific items plus an additional amount to be determined for all other intangible items. Sincerely, J. Steven Grand President Taneum Computer Products, Inc. 243 SW 41" Street Renton, WA 98055 Ei ,J 1 A e i From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Dave Jones Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 7:00 PM Subject: Re: IKEA Way Address Change Printing Costs Dear Mr. Jones: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Dave Jones" <davej @ westcoastpaint.com> 10/4/2004 3:56:01 PM >>> Here are costs of printing for the potential address change. I will bring receipts or quotes on listed items to tonight's council meeting. Thank you, David Jones Westcoast Painting, LLC 265 SW 41st Street Renton, WA 98055 Mailing: PO Box 3509 Renton, WA 98056 (425)251-8300 Fax (425)251-8302 davei@westcoastpaint.com astPainting WCP Printing and Address Change Expenses LLC Quote or Back up is Receipt Out Source Office Mgr. Office Mgr. Time Cost to Purchase Item # Description Attached Attached Cost Time in Hours at $50/hr Supplies Item Totals I Reprinting of our last order of EWA forms in Triplicate yes yes $ 1,095.00 2.00 $ 100.00 $ $ 1,197.00 2 Reprinting of Daily forms in duplicate yes yes $ 535.00 2.00 $ 100.00 $ $ 637.00 3 Have all 21 employee business cards reprinted in house yes can not do it 42.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 192.00 $ 2,334.00 4 Changing address with Vendors / with Mailers 10.00 $ 500.00 $ 20.00 $ 530.00 5 Changing address with customer base / with Mailers 40.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 80.00 $ 2,120.00 6 Changing address with Associates, Associations and Institutions 5.00 $ 250.00 $ 10.00 $ 265.00 7 Reprinting Payroll account checks $ 168.80 2.00 $ 100.00 $ - $ 270.80 8 Reprinting on business acoount checks $ 168.80 2.00 $ 100.00 $ $ 270.80 9 Office mgrs. time to deal with this form 3.00 $ 150.00 $ $ 153.00 0.00 $ - $ $ 10 0.00 $ $ $ I 1 0.00 $ $ $ 12 0.00 $ - $ $ 13 0.00 $ $ $ 14 0.00 $ $ $ 15 0.00 $ $ $ 16 0.00 $ - $ $ 17 0.00 $ - $ $ 18 0.00 $ $ $ 19 0.00 $ $ $ 20 0.00 $ $ $ 21 0.00 $ - $ $ 0.00 $ $ $ 0.00 $ - $ - $ $ L2324 Totals $ 1,967.60 108.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 302.00 $ 7,777.60 aej(" !0(0uoy From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Dave Hamilton Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 7:02 PM Subject: Re: Printing costs for Delivery Express, Inc. if SW 41 st Street is renamed Dear Mr. Hamilton: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Dave Hamilton" <dave@deliveryexpressinc.com> 10/4/2004 7:02:27 PM >>> Our replacement cost for printing would be about $2500. Dave Hamilton Delivery Express, Inc. Renton, Washington 98055 &bJ ",a�tice 1oh/Zoa y From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: M Smith Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 11:45 AM Subject: Re: Ikea Way - vote no please Dear Mr. Smith: Thank you for your email to City Council. Copy has been forwarded to all Councilmembers. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk 425-430-6502 >>> "M Smith" <jema8675@hotmail.com> 10/4/2004 9:13:26 AM >>> Dear Renton City Council, I will admit, I neither live, nor work in Renton. However I do pass through twice a day on my way to and from work from home. As a result, I buy from many businesses in the area, anything from cars to furnishings. I would like to offer my opinion that I do not like the concept of the change of name to Ikea Way. I empathize with the other businesses in the area. So, just because they are the biggest around, they get their way? What next, will they demand police presence at their stores, just because they can get it? So, 1 recommend a no vote on this street name change. Respectfully, Bruce Smith From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Ginny Garrett Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 11:46 AM Subject: Re: Renaming Street Dear Ms. Garrett: Thank you for your email to City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk 425-430-6502 >>> "Ginny Garrett" <garrettvl@comcast.net> 10/4/2004 9:46:19 AM >>> This is in addition to my prior comments. Another "What's next"? Perhaps renaming our city to IKEA? They already have their name added to our Renton River Days and to our Performing Arts Center. Enough is ENOUGH! Virginia Garrett dhln�^_t /o/41/Z"o0Y From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Michael M. Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 6:55 PM Subject: Re: Ikea Way Dear Mr. Maddux: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If 1 can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Michael M." <mookie5381 @msn.com> 10/4/2004 12:06:47 PM >>> Renton City Council: I am writing to you today in regards to the proposed renaming of 41 st St to Ikea Way. While some may decry this as a flat out hand-out to a large tax payer, so to speak, I must agree that Ikea Seattle's contributions to the community are enough reason alone to make this change. When I say this, I don't mean solely their monetary contributions to community causes, which are important, but also the economic side of their contributions. Being a large employer that has a good salary matrix with decent benefits is a true treat to find in these days of Wal-Marts and Sam's Clubs. Their once a year thank -you to their employees through a one day sale where all proceeds go to bonuses is also a very positive message to send to their workers. I think it is important to note that happy workers are happy citizens, and are less likely to partake in criminal activities that cost a city even more in the long run. Of course, the questions arises as to why I care. I live in Marysville, not Renton. Well, to be honest, I care very greatly for the city of Renton. My great-grandfather, Michael Lotto, founded his grocery store chain, Market Basket, in the city of Renton. My great-grandfather Dale and great-grandmother Inez Merritt were lifetime residents of the city of Renton. In fact, until recently, my great-grandmother Marjorie Lotto was a resident of your fine city. Needless to say, my family has deep roots in the city of Renton. If my great-grandfather will still alive today, I can only imagine that he would support such a move for such a civicly responsible company as Ikea, and I hope that you make the right decision and go ahead with the name change. Best regards Michael Maddux Date: Subject: Citizens to Council Via Clerk Mvohall@aol.com Mon, Sep 27, 2004 9:11 PM Re: Ikea Way subject matter Dear Mr. O'Halloran: Thank you for your email to City Council. Copy is being distributed to all Councilmembers for their review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> <Mvohall@aol.com> 9/27/2004 8:06:54 PM >>> Dear Council - After watching the latest City Council meetings on the subject, may I suggest the following as the street name for Ikea - Southeast Forty First Ikea Way. (SE 41st Ikea Way) Best regards, Mike O'Halloran 425-271-6973 A__d� �1 rnh4w From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: TheresaZimmerman Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2004 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Rename of SW 41 st Street Dear Ms. Zimmerman: Thank you for your email to the City Council. Copy is being forwarded to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "TheresaZimmerman"<TheresaZim m erman @Earth link. net> 10/4/2004 6:03:51 PM >>> October 4, 2004 Dear Council Members, Subject: Renaming of SW 41st Street After weeks of reading. newspaper articles, doing on-line research, mulling over issues of democracy, honor, privilege, contribution, notification, business expense, business tax base, dishonor, historical precedent, the role of government and the like I have a couple of things to say as a resident voter regarding the topic of the renaming of SW 41 st Street in Renton. An article in the on-line King County Journal dated 9/21/04 written by Oscar Halpert repeats Councilperson Clawson's comments surrounding his concern that the evidence of financial costs potentially incurred by the businesses on SW 41 st St. needed to be verified. He says "I'm not suggesting they are exaggerating or anything but the city is a business. .. The last part of his sentence is of interest to me. My responses to his comments are these: "The city is most definitely not a business. A municipality is many things, but it is not a business. It is a trust, it is an institution, it is a rung on the ladder of democracy, it is administrative, it has many roles, but it does not exist in order to make a profit. It is not a business. It may conduct itself in a business like way, as in professional conduct, but it is not a business. City government must concern itself with the welfare of the whole community in a non -arbitrary and rule based (or law -based) manner. As a resident and voter: . My interest in the topic has to do with the origin of the idea. The knowledge that there are other streets in the U.S. named "Ikea Way" leads me to wonder: Whose idea was the street renaming? . My interest in the topic has to do with what my elected officials are doing conferring an honor that has no precedent. And spending city money to do it. What indeed did happen to the "Proclamations" of years past? What did happen to adopting a structure and methodology for bestowing honors before bestowing the honors themselves? . My interest in the topic has to do with the fact that any honor the city bestows does not have the effect of actual or implied dishonor to others not so honored. . My interest is that the city coffers retain their integrity and are not used in ways that either are or appear to be arbitrary. I truly hope that you can come to a decision that accommodates the essence of Renton's integrity and sense of fair play. Sincerely, Theresa Zimmerman 813 North First Street Renton, WA 98055 �Ci NOLITE (O `�/moo �. WNWQ0F4'rRQ4, jaRQQUQ"%, t",Cs Solutions that Move the VVorIdTN' September 30, 2004 Attn: Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Renton City Council c/o City Clerk 1055 S. Grady Way, Rm. 728 Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renaming of SW 41" Street to SW Ikea Way as Approved by City Council on 8/23/2004 CITY OF RE TO4 CT 0 4 e()04 R= (,'E!Vc:r-, Econolite is enclosing its fiscal impacts created by the street name change. As you can see compared to others in the East Valley Business Park it is a relatively small number. Econolite does not have a problem with changing the name to SW IKEA Way. However, Econolite feels that IKEA should be responsible for the costs to change our office stationary. After all, IKEA will be getting free advertising on all of Econolite's stationary. Please review our costs and let us know what the status is on the changing of the street name. Thank you, om A Ann M. Roach Estimator Phone: 425-251-4994 Fax: 425-251-0622 Enclosures: 10 247 SW 41st Street, Renton, WA 98055-4930 o PH:(425) 251-4994 o FAX: (425) 251-0622 www.econoiite.com Y ONOLIT �EQa'ita41 Rfta9%U0Ir0. t " Q, ECOROCIT Solutions that f\Aove the \/Vorld' N COSTS FOR STREET NAME CHANGE COST TO NOTIFY ALL CONTACTS OF NAME CHANGE- 600 COUNT DATABASE POSTAGE STAMPS 500 EACH $ 0.37 $ 185.00 PAPER 1 REAM $ 4.99 $ 4.99 ENVELOPES 1 BOX $ 58.50 $ 68.50 LABOR TO WRITE AND MAIL LETTERS 8 HOURS $ 18.50 $ 148.00 TOTAL COST $ 396.49 COST TO CHANGE ALL STATIONARY PRODUCTS SELF INKING ADDRESSING STAMP 1 EACH $ 26.75 $ 26.75 5000 STANDARD ENVELOPES 1 EACH $ 252.75 $ 252.75 5000 WINDOW ENVELOPES 1 EACH $ 344.25 $ 344.25 COMPANY LETTERHEAD(BOXES OF 500) 10 EACH $ 65.99 $ 659.90 BUSINESS CARDS(BOXES OF 1000) 4 EACH $ 29.99 $ 119.96 ADDRESS LABELS(600 EACH) 1 EACH $ 64.50 $ 64.50 COMPANY CHECKS(500 EACH) 1 EACH $ 123.50 $ 123.50 TOTAL COST $ 1,591.61 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,988.10 247 SW 415' Street, Renton, WA 98055-4930 e PH:(425) 251-4994 e FAX: (425) 251-0622 www.econolite.com Staples Manila File Folders, Letter, 113 Cut, Assorted Position, 100/Box $3.99 Qty. 100/Box 1 Weekly Specials Find the paper that's right for you. Click Isere. Grab the great deals - Weekly Specials - Limited time only! Item Staples Professional Multipurpose Paper (201-b. and 96 Bright) Online C > C Page [ 1 2 3 ] pact IpCheck i ,View On Price Unit Buy from as low as 500/Ream $4.99 Staples Premium Multipurpose Paper (201-b. as low as 500/Ream 0 Line iten and 92 Brigs $3.99 Staples 30% Recycled Copy Paper, 8 1/2" x as low as 5,000/Case Qty. Item 11 ", Case $26.49 Free Deliv over $50! Staples Copy Paper 201-b. and 84 Bright) as low as 500/Ream $4.55 Staples Bright White Printing Paper 241b. and as low as 500/Ream 108 Bright) $4.50 Shopph Save a li Hammermill Color Qgpier Paper (281-b. and 96 as low as 500/Ream you buy Bri ht $9.89 Items. > More Ir Great White MultiUse 24 Paper (241-b. and 90 as low as 500/Ream Bri ht $5.69 Great White Multi -Use Recycled Paper (201-b. as low as 500/Ream and 84 Bright) $4.35 Hammermill CopyPlus Copy Paper (201-b. and as low as 500/Ream 84 Bright $2.54 HammerMill Fore® MP A4-Size Multifunction as low as 500/Ream Paper (201b. and 88 Brigs $4.99 Item Price Unit Page [ 1 2 3]f mxt R i Help I Order Status I Find a Store I Questions? Call 1-800-3STAPLE or email us Staples 365 Savings 1 1 for Business Credit I Staples Business Rewards Upromise I Affiliate Program http://www.staples.com/Catalog/Browse/class.asp?PageType=3&ClassID=140691 &bcFla... 9/27/2004 Welcome to Rapidforms Page 1 of 1 Products > Envelopes > Standard IOWW, #10 Regular Envelope Size: 4 1/8 x 9 1/2" ® Larger View. Look more professional! Envelopes printed with your name and address save you time. Give your business a professional, established look! ■ White wove stock. ■ Die -cut construction. ■ Choose a typestyle for your company name ■ Choose an ink color 10WW-1 imprinted envelope 250/$50.95 Pricing Information: 250 500 1000 2500 5000 1OWW-1 imprinted envelope $50.95 $58.50 $75.25 $150.75 $252.75 ■ Send me a sample of this product http://Www.rapidforms.comINASApplrfEcat/productslproduct_detail.j sp?pc=10WW&key... 9/27/2004 Welcome to Rapidforms Page 1 of 1 RRS200X, Self -Inking Stamper 400 Larger View. Use this self -inking stamper for signatures, addresses or other commonly rewritten information to save time! ■ Enough room for a complete bank deposit. ■ Up to six lines, max. 30 characters per line. ■ Impression area: 2 1/2" x 1". ■ Choose a typestyle for your company name ■ Choose an ink color RRS200X-1 1/$26.75 ` Pricing Information: 1 2 3 RRS20OX-1 $26.75 $53.50 $80.25 http://www.rapidforms.com/NASApplrfEcatlproductslproduct_detail. j sp?pc=RRS20OX&k... 9/27/2004 Welcome to Rapidforms Page 1 of 1 10SEW, #10 Security Window Envelope - White Size: 4 1/8 x 9 1/2" 4WAWMKm "A ngw, V- r. r*.a fto RLarger View. Protect your business correspondence with envelopes printed inside to hide contents. ■ White wove stock. ■ Die -cut construction. ■ Printed lining to protect your privacy. ■ Choose a typestyle for your company name ■ Choose an ink color 10SEW-1 imprinted envelope 250/$55.50 Pricing information; 250 500 1000 2500 5000 10SEW-1 imprinted envelope $55.50 $73.95 $93.75 $194.50 $344.25 ■ Send me a sample of this product http://www.rapidforms.com/NASApplrfEcat/productslproduct_detail.j sp?pc=10SEW&key... 9/27/2004 www.staples.marktheworld.com -- Stamps, Signs and Promotional Products Page 1 of 1 You have 1 item in your cart. - To update an item's quantity, change the Qty. number and click Upd�t "r Free Standard Shipping for a Limited Time! To view saved items and add them to your cart, click here. Item Description Price Qty. Remove Subtotal White Smooth Custom proof -,1 LHSB1-C Letterhead With Reflexbl-black $65.99 10 ❑ $659.90 Flat Ink - Sold in Box(es) of edit =f 500 Calculate State Sales Tax (where applicable *) $0.00 Standard Shipping - After Production (UPS Ground) $50.00 Express Shipping - After Production (Overnight) $100.00 Total $759.90 Promo Code: Click'Update Cart' to use coupon. Some restrictions may apply. u��t� Gaet Please proof your item(s) by clicking 'proof next to the item above. Once your order is placed, you agree that you have proofed your design(s), verified your information is correct, and authorized printing. Your order is in process as soon as it is placed. Therefore, we are unable to allow for changes or corrections and/or cancellations. Note: Sales tax may apply. Color and resolution of your items may vary slightly with printing. * If you are using a Staples Credit Card/Open Account and have filed your tax exempt certificate with Staples, your credit card/open account will not be charged tax. If you are not sure that you have filed your tax certificate with Staples, please call Staples at 800-333-3330 for filing verification. If you have not filed you will be given instructions on where to send a copy of your tax exempt certificate to obtain credit for any tax charged. http://www.staples.marktheworld.comishoppingcart.asp?associatenum=l &sessionGUID=3... 9/27/2004 www.staples.marktheworld.com -- Stamps, Signs and Promotional Products Page 1 of 1 AH THE'HEQ -Search Our Products: GD _> Order by Custom Printing Catalog No. Username Password Forget Login info? '._/ > Order Status > Review your saved work > View vour l000 storaae > Customer Service > Benefits > Help > Privacy Policy > Terms & Conditions 'IA) to supllww MR .. t=I E Home Business Cards Stamps i Labels promotional Signs a. Business Stationery Goods & Apparel Banners forts ---------- MarkTheWorld Shopping Cart You have 1 item in your cart. - To update an item's quantity, change the Qty. number and click update Cart Free Standard Shipping for a Limited Time! To view saved items and add them to your cart, click here. Item Description Price Qty. Remove S White Smooth Standard proof1 BCSB1 Business Cards With Reflexbl- $29 99 1 black Raised Ink - Sold in Box edit (es) of 1000 Calculate State Sales Tax (where applicable) Standard Shipping - After Production (UPS Ground) Express Shipping - After Production (Overnight) Total Click 'Update Cart' to use coupon. Promo Code: Some restrictions may apply. Y PP Y• iUptlate C Please proof your item(s) by clicking 'proof next to the item above. Once your order is placed, you agree that you have proofed your design(s); verified your information is correct, and authorized printing. Your order is in process as soon as it is placed. Therefore, we are unable to allow for changes or corrections and/or cancellations. Note: Sales tax may apply. Color and resolution of your items may vary slightly with printing. * If you are using a Staples Credit Card/Open Account and have filed your tax exempt certificate with Staples, your credit card/open account will not be charged tax. If you are not sure that you have filed yot tax certificate with Staples, please call Staples at 800-333-3330 for filing verification. If you have not file you will be given instructions on where to send a copy of your tax exempt certificate to obtain credit for tax charged. http://www.staples.marktheworld.com/shoppingcart.asp?associatenum=l &sessionGUID=3... 9/27/2004 Welcome to Rapidforms Page 1 of 1 LML9, Color Preferences Laser Mailing Label Size: 4 x 3 1/3" ir YOUR FIRM NAME RPRE, e 456 Any 3tr"t Your'Tok . state,'bp + 4 RLarger View. Quality labels get noticed! Great for all kinds of shipments. ■ For use with laser printers. ■ Includes personalization up to 4 lines. ■ Choice of product color ■ Choose a typestyle for your company name ■ Choose an ink color LML9-1 imprinted ! 300/$44.95 Pricing Informations 300 600 1200 1800 2400 4800 LML9-1 imprinted $44.95 $64.50 $91.50 $123.95 $152.50 $255.50 http://www.rapidforrns.com/NASApplrfEcatlproductslproduct_detail.jsp?pc=LML9&key 1... 9/27/2004 Welcome to Rapidforms Page 1 of 1 Business Tips/Facts Products > Checks & Deposit Tickets > One -Write Free reverse numbering is available on laserrinkjet checks to accomodate RD4, One -Write Disbursement Check printers which require face down form feeding. Size: 8 1/4 x 3 5/16" Need Help? sS Checks_& Deposit Tickets Envelopes Tax Forms & Software Computer & Manual Forms Apparel.& Accessories Marketiny_Products Postcard _& GreetingCards Holiday_ Cards Calendars Retail Supplies Labels_& Tags Office Essentials Full Color Products - All Products gigs MFJtIR YOYM, SYAIin.IP sa .- M - .. '.:. FtiWNAN�t# Ri Larger View. Transfer check information quickly to post ledger and journal entries! Compatible with Safeguard System D4 and Deluxe System 114001. ■ Works with One -Write Kits to save time. ■ Transfers information directly to the Journal and Ledger. ■ Choice of product color RD4-11-part 250/$91.95 Pricing Information., 250 500 1000 2000 3000 RD4-1 1-part $91.95 $123.50 $164.50 $272.95 $379.50 ■ Send me a_sample of this_product service@rapidforms.com @ Copyright 2002-2004 Rapidforms, Inc. All rights reserved. http://Www.rapidforms.com/NASApp/rfEcatlproductslproduct_detail.jsp?pc=RD4&key 1=... 9/27/2004 r ZCk- From: Tami Dauenhauer To: Covington, Jay; Keol ker-W heeler, Kathy; Medzegian, Julia; Todd, Derek Date: 10/4/2004 8:23:46 AM Subject: Citizen Complaint Re IKEA Way 10-2-04 Karen McDaniel left a voice message for the Mayor's Office, saying she wanted to let the Mayor know how unhappy she is about the proposed renaming of 41 st Street to IKEA Way. She said she does not want "everything in Renton to be called IKEA." She didn't specifically ask for a return call, but did leave her phone number, which is 425-277-6502. CC: Pnnu--llar,__Margaret