Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-184 O4 Y o ♦ IR + NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmer t Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Publ c Approvals. y PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-184,V-B/SCHOBER VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial(IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever,is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx.20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides(SW Jackson St.,Longacres Parkway,SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. The applicant plans to expand the existing manufacturing facility on the site. The existing building is 11,777 sq.ft.and the applicant plans a 31,554 sq.ft.addition to the south and east of the existing building. The applicant would add additional parking/maneuvering areas, landscaping and stormwater detention for the addition. The building expansion is no subject to land use permits and only building permits would be required. PROJECT LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW PUBLIC APPROVALS: . Variance—Board of Adjustments Comments on the above application'must be submitted in writing to Peter Roseri;Project Manager,Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,E by.5:00 PM on January 14,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a•party-of record'and'receive additional noti ication:by_mail;contact Mr. Rosen at 430-7219. Anyone who submits written Comment ,wilt automatically-become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. '. _ • • The date of Wednesday,January 26,2000, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before.the City of Rentor!'s Board'of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: December 21,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 29,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 29,1999 • G —•--•-r _mot`.�•..�— _� _� .c�u...r, Ns— • ., -•' '7::^�. scµ9BERf^10.o1V.FT ZKT2-RIO0.S'. . .,- -:f - -. 140 MH 3 J.*• / J•:. OfTGR Rw o S.V.I. _._::.., ... i • MANSION=AM " • • 1. (0 ,_ gym:%AMMO �,e). � I �; 1� 1 A '1 f • Ito"mcm alu.r . Y(1(1X,OAYOW WAIL YAP I I".loll -a:. NOTICE OF APP 0 0 - CITY OF RENTON .. ---..rciretral;, ---, */: •.••••••orae•O _ Ma Planning/Building/Public Works r-- I vs, 44, cc 0 * , , 0 DEC 2 9'9 9 04 7,,'.4411,erTA ''''. 0 3 0 5 • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 V3 I-. Cu CO AIMMM * CC g , - 0 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED CI.116, 7132B026 U.S.u.s. POSTAGE 7 T E ii --- ,- -- ; ' : :1331Aq,:i FM PRESDRTED SEA 1.A 981 --,---- , • - , ,V,,f,, ,:',t11L4. ORDER F-1411, 0 . 242304-9029-09 nuiNG —94rinfiV 0 ',I R R & NAV CO 201303 %--- 1 UNION PACIFIC RR CORP , , PC BOX 2500 ' BROONFIELO CO 80020 R MI ji§i134 O��Y O'et NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-184,V-B/SCHOBER VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial(IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever,is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx.20 to 24-feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior • to site construction. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides(SW Jackson St.,Longacres Parkway,SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street • frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. The applicant plans to expand the existing manufacturing facility on the site. The existing building is 11,777 sq.ft.and the applicant plans a 31,554 sq.ft.addition to the south and east of the existing building. The applicant would add additional parking/maneuvering areas, landscaping and stormwater detention for the addition. The building expansion is not subject to land use permits and only building permits would be required. PROJECT LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW PUBLIC APPROVALS: -Variance—Board of Adjustments Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 14,2000. If you heave questions about this proposal,or wish to,be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Nlr. Rosen at 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The date of Wednesday,January 26,2000,at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment\will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: December 21,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 29,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 29,1999 9. \\c,-•TO'..,, ., `,s,N ce'"f'. ✓ , �,.r tf ( /+ ! � ;. f , %'.:.,;- 'tit .as ��•• \a., :. !� . . � �'.� �'.::T�.-. ; s h„ 1 '••"f` /\RCINFT ZA 0.5 S.14.1- ''' •IVBMem„ca Rau. - !Y ' %: ycS F! • SLNOBLR. C.CIPANSION YODEL I b 1' `I _ KR b0og4R . LIMBORNOOD DETAIL MAP I "• NOTICE OF APP . a 0 CITY OF RENT ON , . . . , ..a,,,,,, ...9Warear••••••—.............1 • 2 2,- Wu-. T.' • NA Planning/Building/Public Works •-• 5. 0 io O . EC cz, L tfr'Ar?4,4 .., .. * ' 0 . 0P-PS-4 — ; 5 * . a 4. a G.) 0 ... * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 cc ,— DEC 2 n9 rama iu co _ '1: _172.1Eon ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 94 -IC 4. r 1 2- ID I ritSOtTEr. • ,A A U.S. POSTAGE- - • ....._. • • • ------- --- • • ----, 242304-9063-06 . ' I HU1SH FAMILY FUN CENTERS 811407 - 33208 PASEO CERVEZA__IM . ______, _ , SAN JUAN CAP Ir._ _ ._. 1-1UISa0eilk----92675•2003 '1.teget-•044•---0.1./04/00- • - • FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND : 1-4UI51-4 FAMILY FUN CTRS j .. 333. 6.1. MARINA VISTA DR DANA POINT CA 9262'9-11.0S • • " , •.:.?- . . ..14.10g7)‘.....> fldAdAlindd.1.1!,.11.1 hiiiniiimiliAintimhiliduilidimi - cY igft �• NT0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-184,V-B/SCHOBER VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial(IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever,is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx.20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously app oved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides(SW Ja kson St.,Longacres Parkway,SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street ' frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. The applicant plans to expand the existing manufacturing facility on the site. The existing building is 11,777 sq.ft.and th applicant plans a 31,554 sq.ft.addition to the south and east of the existing building. The applicant would add addition I parking/maneuvering areas, landscaping and stormwater detention for the addition. The building expansion is not su ject to land use permits and only building permits would be required. PROJECT LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW PUBLIC APPROVALS: Variance—Board of Adjustments Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Ros n,Project Manager,Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton;WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 14,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional hotificati n by mail,contact Mr. Rosen at 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The date of Wednesday,January 26,2000,at 7:30 PM, has been set for la variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hail,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: December 21,1999 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 29, 1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 29,1999 \.,..\-',4:-:‘,:-„:„•.„-.'it;:,,,-.,,,,_ . .%V.:'). .\ , 1 4'yT" ,:N'}:.,_ ne wL • ;•, '‘‘Al ., \:.\_‘'.. r'4.'".• \\\ . • ::j:L.,=,•:':7 21 4' .. '' •-i,...,'.: — --itr.-- 7- �`'". ci TORS" v; s •. `'� -;�L. SCHOBER AIRCRAFT SAITER /`• iVOo Moo TGR Rat. S.W. ___ �4p5 „,' : • I mN°B;R 0C[YPIXSION MIKE NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL NAP A _ �— _ NOTICE OF APP 1111111111111111.1111" ' ..... .•\, :-.., , . , . , .,..._ 0 0 CITY OF RENTON - ow , _ .. : , 0. svaln • eel Ur "V&om/ 14141• ti',-iPlannng/Building/Publc Works t a , DEC ra.14 1 z 5 : 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 tra I--. 2 W99 0 3 0 u • PB METER * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED . ' ..1 .` 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE • . _. •. • , 242304-9117-Q2 KING COUNTY - ... _ 701724 DEFT 1-2 NATURAL RESOURCES 506 2ND ME 11708 M/S 1ST. r--, SEATTLE WA98104 V., .. fiD-T LgTER:BLEi .,, AS ADDRESSED " •;:.1,-, UNABLE 10 FORWARD I-- --- RETURN TO SENDER ' 6. '.1j j-1 71.-';.- •_ SAM/k8-14.6 HAAAAAAALHA laddHALLLAukhhhAddiA - • •• '..4.:',. i . f \-1.k 1 IFt6\4Ar 4 litiln'l �Q' J �l Q. ,� ,o-p , rEilt3ri-°**`4 fit•`'-61 ;po - ' s b , e , 9 -, �< 1: 14- �f jS (� O Ip`, • f11�. a����°4 SRD EARL' ' 21 II /$ to -- Lei .� r p', ;11 : ACOM SO ,, �¢N ��/ y` \'� q, e-, rrr,i1 ,, .1N.�.. it, 7 131STgS71 i EM 1 �a 19 y ��_ 6 I S� �_0_ P • . .A i 2N0 SDhPST, �� °�Dc 7 p��i y.. -i33Ro _ yT ` �I.� 1 23 p, z2 2I _ z0 \ . ^.. C. - 1 ik , 9 ��.. �\ Ov o oc J pc ar ' F.�C. 3 �'z r3aT"7 i0 Z� EAR�.�N .0STE " < \ ..'ss"c,”?1 900 �'/ �,4 sT„ .p.. ti .��! Q C CT 4i, R'4 - Sr • i• ,+ is, Foster '� • \'���C'j PQ REAL J Oc g �� Z 5 A�: qo s . ` _�. �/ ESTATE _ i�"v. C, h I S CAMEL o ao • , �� '\ / (< zv E8uT TIE4 ac �0 7 /�/ Golf , 6 ,, pc , CORD I o� i0112.00 .: �' �Sw i •mac!` �� TER C \\ 3� g 6 S ppp 2 „ I r--- . , e7^ N oTh.f/1-1 �� �;'•, ,, j Course." �: j4 NC . ii • • • I .►' S� at\ o ` . \ �\ , ; i0 . f? af, = w �s ; I R1teL > / rN f ° 'Ir s� �: �` I e/p C . , 'I7 rZE8 -Z.O , e�„ c.' (fj S � _ ,t 4 1�C 1T r+ - - ill� H T -�� r.' 8 l 1 , .zn ' ( —\` .� '1�(- Sr \ 5 I s \ 5Mr Tin ST___- Z ., ' - ,' �� BLACK i3�o = '� ;� 1='r '�' ,-. RIVER - - L.,.. FOSTER D Metro \ - - S_ 4TTr. ST� _ I_ � NW/f� r •, T e- & / /`ff *�� I ���� i ,, -MAY !�—-C k, • • scy S 151ST ST '�t� / �.. =- ,, --moo23 ly l . ♦ �05 F , I� - \.- ` ■a� WII 3 i33�o sr /�! —� 1 \ ST S w ION S w i�rti ,,-f-- -1ST'') '-'\. '' IS* ' '`t4: -1 m �Li v �� . cn U ;� \�\ oc i I1 z IL': 1 �,' . •ueewii.Q 1 TAAR� WAY I CT y w -, '''3 • ■ a" H Southcenter 1 6AKER BLvO `Z/ „ i ME4DER DC. j Y 4CO i. • OM • 'p -)iJ TRAHDER BLVD . 1 / D LO• ENTPLANNINC I 47. .o,,Jj ir r:1 a C17Y •F RENTON Q a Y p�� ? Q E 21 1999 2 6 • - a _ 5z o • OF z � _ - 0 0 0 • 61._x. �.�„. FLOOR PLAN NOTES U ffi cuffil R m DE HEATED IAIU AIR CL69xIOE0 PER ['� ' OWNER RECIARELENTS S1S.m BE LADEN DESIGNED.PERCY Y�Y RELOCATE[2 CAM/AMR AS REWIRED BY THE CITY OF RENTON SHALL DE 11 Is'-0�Ye' '-O�9b' XI'-Bx' PROMO BY ME HOC CONTRACTOR 9NWNG COARIANCE w/THE OWA TO VEST // Y 10.1 . / •CURRENT WAS IIG,W STATExW RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1996 'FRST EKON OR AS REWIRED BY ME CITY OF RENTON PEPoVEIER `w. ^/ WAILS SHALL BE FLARED WM.A.WM UR-13 DIARA. VMa l ri!AP:O, ``� RET.DER SHALL BE PLACED 7ER ME WARN SIDE(w INTER)DO// EX.0018 `/, CONCRETEnr h INALATION WERE TACK'INauTION(S UUD WM WO MD OAAY o RAw PFAs1RUCAL NRARG NWUnW SHALL BE FACE S1A➢{ED VAPoR PElIAOEt SHALL' r EDsnxc s[A uYw q Low uasnmE MANswsPAtt uARRIu a xor uaRE •F••1RL6.Eli .IC MAN H0 PERM aR�aP,` ` I rrY W �TLR._ FD A>�AA ARE,D BE IS.1rED PER DWRRI^1�`\ `` /3: PCOAPELFNIs AS¢N-HEAiFD PACE(8 BN/$F).MIEY t0 BEW iDONN �aa \'^ _ / \ OB00ER OESIg1[D.fNEAGY LµLL1Ang5 AS REWIRD BY ME CITYII11`�TO`\ tf RENiW 91 µBE PRONOEO BY ME NVAC CWIFACIORNrRWNN q.`WYOK EL \ / fS1IwT'GEND.DE O CE EO ME CBY RE CR OF M RI /••C 'o mENERGY CWE q AS PEadREO BY ME CITY 0.Agiq PERAEI@ F'1b F II'-6' f 9'-VI:I� FRILLY NF/.IED s:4 w NIURE s, All GAS LLYCS •a tWasr�.XUDWir /�/ _ { 1 STRUCTURAL ':rAEz m BE NGNsnAtEO(sErl-HaArzO SPA¢}ws air vwwc ry w o ROLL-UP CON o / - I 1 SUB Al RE P.MONO POUNDER SR.BE UNHARMED.DE i 8 �Jl _ r G `/,.^X,` EN.Rau v1Au:DE DIMMED NTH R-n DawAnW(urewu. "'o `l L/ 'NTT W/OEI"GAIN TC'EXCFDI ABOVE Rwu AREAS 19711E r, i \Vl M.DE➢GN TO PREVENT NOME DM UP(PE6aRATED.ETC) W g IW"s'Vr 1�1 _ \q rn' \ _ _ � _ __ —-__ J 'NTT caxmACTw la P7.0 IDc DAM q wsnAmx II x xT A u0 ELEEC AND CTRIC+,ELECTRICAL CRUD.IINT�OR h[TSMOOT OOR�IgIHTw. E W y 3.Ir NAMES)PER CRNEA IEWRENENTS ENERGY CALaUTICNS AS • DOW-II I /R\ 9,. no- AiRrYm CCATRAACTR MINY THE OTT Cf GN CaNPUAR6 WPR/DC BY 0 m=^ '_� wGx II u .1.' ^ NA G1W STATE ENEMY WEE oR AS REWIRED BY ME WY OF I"1 W ^¢.v I� C t/> S...ES(MIEROR AND EXTERIOR).EXTERIOR).DWR TYPES IRN.ETC: L PER OWNER REaIW11ENTS. II \ 6.P11P AL DOWWMIPa119XA�LL 60 66'"WLR1�[R FVVC.PANT T00 1111 II VA.BU 000E SCUPPERS SHALL HAVE B'X19'COOING(RN)AND 9= ].ROawO TO OVERFLOW5.X9*ONO 3 PLY(CASs BBILLY-UP W/MINERAL W SHEET W Z I' \ AC3 N O IORq DOWN PER OWNER REQUIREMENTS(A PP uA%%w LOAD)WM O x'PER FOOT SLOPE.VERIFY ROMIG TYPE W/OWER SPECIFICATION N [I 8 REVENS 9aLL BE PLACED PER BUILDING REVAngS REVEAL Z DEEM SHALL NOT EXCEED x'NET. DOCK-II '- (30) 9 UNDM SLAB SEVER h WA.PER OWNER REOUREUENIS•.Fr W/ Q wq II OMFR PRIOR 10 SUB CONSTRUCTION. d I 'Z ID 0RONDE PoRIABIE PRE SF Cf BUILD00 1100IFR0(0A1a00 OR PE1IW}(1)FOR X / II ALL EATS TO IN XrtOORR OF DIE BUILDING R NG SNAIL llWINATED DISTANCE 1-1-1AREA OR IS'Cf TRAWL'q I o� 4+t/> ANOSWEO PER 199E UBC¢CTIa15 I00328 lc1003.291.MESE DOTS U y, - ARE Da7a BY(V)W ME PUN RETABOXG • I I I —4 12 1997I BC W WTN XDC INRM DOOR LOCKS VAIL K COWRY C gSECn1106ON 112 MD SIll(03.11.13 OF THE Z 3 •• ANTICIPATED ALLOW I,1 _ _-0 _ _ _ _- 1 _ _ _ _ - - (1)STORY MICE a OF I WET ATCHEGu(ONE JAM O BEORI(NBC FRON IRE INTOUOR OF NE G 10033UI18ME U¢ LU rd IS 1100 00 PATCHES PHONE JAC%5,LO BE CWI111NATFp WM M. W o O , \ 1l X19¢BRS D ERfxxL P[R1ERR PFA OMEN RE 502100IIS m ¢ 4.0 ' N (TR e ,o O ti DWEIEM Pa1S IATCNET•LOdS.AAO ODIR OP AND STORAGE 51 O U WARS.MOOR CAWEI$ft(RIENG FIXTURES ANO 1001 0001WRITES. 2 SHALL HAVE A LEVER OR OMEA SHAPE WILW NHL PE100I OPFPAAq C-J BY NMORREPS FRC591RE AND ORq DOES NOT REWOE DON (n § GRASP.PROM OR MONO TO OPERATE IBC SEC.110611 g A SPECULATIVE LEASE SPACE IS 1RXwER CONTRACTOR 9031 001.NNATE SHALL RO¢MECUMS _ C BUY OF AN1W FIRS DEPARNq*. 4 03.936 A) 1,PRONDE PRE-EHYI.E0 ROOF ACCESS HA.PER OWNER REaREYELR _ ' - DOOR AND WINDOW NOTES ffnnnnnr-71I _ I DOORS MOMS gALLWME9ff 139119E NOTED ON DIE PUNS I I"I'I I I I I I I II ._ C ALL EXTERIOR DOORS m BE MIMED LPN TUCK HOLLOW _ I I I I I I i I__1i I CORE MESH..DO.0 010E awir 001PAN FRAME. V VALUE0E 60�G L__ 1 C DOORS EMI DE OPERABLE TRW THE wSDE WMWL ME USE Cr A Z © _ _ ,1 - _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ O XEr.v[aAl NNOWEDu OR uFOR2 SEE DETAIL X/a FGR FLASHING 4 - E II 3 EXRPoOR DOCKS W01 Q0 000 D ANY 00*EXTERIOR GLAZING PER J I"' J NOTES ON PUNS ODORS SHALL BE OPERABLE TRW ME WIDE d I ►) A WMWT ME U¢OF A HEY.C SOLID MO..a FFFdtf. 1 Y/ tl INTERIOR001DOORS0*091ALL BE Of SWD CORE W000 DOORS 0 WITH MN FWq AND WA1LSrW.;U VALUE 0 AS;DOORS � BE1Wp aDCE AND NAR[Ma¢SHALL BE PR70F0 xM A ANDE \ .USE AND BEER SPEN TRW ME w9OR(OFFICE SIDE) J TIF U¢a A UT.SPEW,NNOMFOQ al ERO11T 1y S. INTFROR WNDCM SHALL¢SINGLE CUE.NM WOOD MKS 11 II (ROFSSTIIROORariS calm .LUNCH. YIIWIFACRPFD NM RE STANDARD 0W OR CARE REWIRED FOR \:w CONNER0N OFD6 USE.STAN RN.NO M BEiWRN ME I WAX AND WARMS(SPACE OF ANY)SHALL HAVE DOUBLE GLUING 111, MANUFACTURING ti/z - x'AR GP AND DEFAULT U VALUE Cr 0)S O - 1, — _ 11,1, I� I� I� \Ir \O S III T-6'A / X T-6' IV Ps'',"WVH F / t, Q O. k p-C / / R, i FPn [e • Ell V 4AAL 04' I, 23•-O•- I WOES 3/6/2001 I e. / 3P-EEC ]6'-8• ¢ 1N-0• / 40•-0- (9)0 35-0' -115-0• DATE / / / / DEC 1999 CCM BY O O ` O ® 0 O O O DE9W ET A.F.P. NM S10rt VENT h EATRO NIL BE POURED TO FLOOR PLAN I7y 900 99-W] PRO.FOR MI PIED 3EORACE u CUSS AC REV. DATE BY DESCAPTOI No . IXNIWIIES m 90 FEEL AYNWH MICR.01100, R "II COIRACTOR m COURm..DEmrr/.RAT. 35i=1•-0' STALL NO¢VALVES t STAIRNS W/FM WARD/ENT ' O Casaal TO NW FRED SEWAGE _ Al (PLAN NORM) !-1 O 30 0 O O (3)0 3I°-0'•9Y-0. O BLYCN POOE O 31'-Bx' O • RA91w4 PEP v41�-DE CONtl21E (''� s�'(z)MADE mArLSIIw DEIAn I/AM AIrcEs �I D DErx i PER f1FVARD LANDSCAPE SCREE x (COL.1) - — _ (COLOR 11 RADY WAY PROPOSED - '6 - Ax CANT STRIP \ 1.OL IINR Ball-DP (� o Ra AL RASLHINC PWRNG f (14 LA wx) a <J •L••( Pr,1x EAsaA INvnAnON, $y ,F IB'-0'(f) r 30'-0° / Q« BOARD 10 PEOARI NOT ELOOR RAN T LANE — Nl PR Ik3/ NOTE El AI ^' 1 1 i -- i e ,VyI — `l i i Y J SEALANT `^ \n \ PRECAST CPIC 0 Z IY/lw IS/IA' J'7.OLOR 2)1 a, RECESSED i.,. CUSS ORICEENW h PANEL m� / (mw 31 Iman 31 (COLOR M) q¢syOO CUSS Oma mar,i= x RYPO.GLASS ¢z FLASHING DETAIL W EAST ELEVATION TB mrap Q ED Brary - 0 0 D 0 0 a . E F.♦(31'-0') POET 0 E.E. DOLT-OF •0 plAuiFR BI0V REu w/ E M9ux4 RR DLl-0P CGNCRER 12R-3•) OCEDIC .118-D•I NDOW.M DEIAL I/AM WALL PANELS / 5'(L)U 9CCME ELfvA1E0 ExISPNO By OND (COLOR 1) �-————-r / ———Z �•) /EE SCREEN PROPOSED IAO➢Y WAY 6XRR� BEraxD 3 A I- 1 ` 1 NE ,,, i f II III PANEL o h\ ti .�, z 1 IRIHpN4 DOCK-HIGH N f c Y Q JII . 4 / • / —T o w i-J i nFf UMZ ______V_: REVEAL DETAIL o\ �b o\ REKALC PER FC4SYD AlUO',Mn h ® ES CC - ♦ J ,„0 DETM 3/A3 GLASS CMS FRONT.i= W g.„0 (COLOR 1) MingD CLASS CO O (Cavil (D4cei) - _ WEST ELEVATION N IE /-� L w/1X,ACNE NO ' -sw PROM EIrvATEDamADr I D 61-Jx O �i v..wl sKa. CD e./o'.[MP rLAWNG PER DETAE R04 O E E 0.AM-LIP f f ROOF RvtvODDO ]viTEVBFD 0/C. 6NXI14B.SE[ / Ifaa+1) ♦I1B•-3')\ ROG xG 2 1 X/CX E.END Cr) 1 •1 all__-- o\ t - IG TYPICALOM Bw,OxG _ (cam caaR:l SOFFIT DETAIL p I iW41 ® .S - y Ijl . U, , U rRDa+ W (3)g"" NORTH ELEVATION W z 352.=1'-0• 30EwAIA NUE M5 SUB PER RAN O 0 0 116-6. 0 OCCURS • w)6'-6° • r` y,y• �IRO-E -f f • f 11 e ' ti RIDGE 0 Ef TILT-UP COKKERM9N0 PER DEIUL I/A1 /R13B-11 aP W PRS D RCf'E R (cam 1) 1 9' ``SLAB EDGE TO BEAR ON NAIVE \ ]7 ,t ` NARK 5M R OR SMOLT E I EKARFS 0/9/1001 I 1/ COMPACTED TO 9Si(OVER E%CAVAR AS NECESSARY)— •\ ® OFFICE FRONT DETAIL DATE _} NTS DEC 1999 DRAWN BY K -�oomsvc1T, REVEALS PER `• G BID 'R'MiC DETAIL 3/A2 _ DESIGN BY (cam31 — — — (Call M) A F.P r (-) rV JOB NO f 3'/M'lY%CAL (C EIPICAL \ \ REV DATE Br 99-017 IC0.DR 11 (C0.CA M) O[YIKPROI SHEET NB SOUTH ELEVATION A2 352.=1.-f9• • Ex.DRAINAGE DITCH LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T23N, R4E, W.M. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: Ex 19'1LEGEND t i CAUTION: RENTON,_- A.29Er GTON cs PROPOSED STORY WATER DISCHARGE '� EX.29 LF Tea n6q®uoN . 136HiG P RENTON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION,DIMENSION,AND DEPTH TO DITCH ON THE WEST SIDE OF ..O ADS 3 1.0% EX W END p=0514'57 nx NYRRNT A A Z -0 OF ALL EASUNG UTIURES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHIXWG THE UPU➢ES LCNGACRES PARKWAY JJST NORM 'T'EX 69 LF 18"a IB'RCP R=90537' AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OF THE INTERSECTION W/S.W.JACKSON //'' F RCP A 719 EL 21 72 L=88.21' At RAMC I I WP'1 THIS ST INCLUDES LUNG UTILITY LOCATE 0I-800C424S5555 AND THEN POTVERNG ALL OF / `SO (O \ 4lito � CRpO� THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW S OP S CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY E8 CB RIM EL= 199 WHETHER OR NOT ONFOCTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS 18 PVC INV II E1=1994 .('R� - /l✓OgORF E%EDGE CMG mom �'" '' IT PVC NYEEL=I9 ET �^ '' // @' f PR q AWHALT �LJI h1 SEM7� ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONNCTS SHOULD OCCUR,ME 18 RCP INV 1'1 EL=20�� _ q/�� UXWGCAPING ' CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT POE ENGINEERING.NC TO RESOLVE ALL PAOPLEMS PRIOR TO Ex O!RB Y , CiN �\`�` BI�,1� PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION LAMP � - PAA%WG Qi ' .1 CONIPOL '4 i ! J �N• Gl�1F1l, BOX '.1 5'CCM • �D. ExIMAm CM 1-� I 1,f\ E.LFVP� NEPC aEL=I / SOUMENIER El=199A RYE0�4 -- R(SigC �'\ DUMPSTER/RECYCLE 1 18-PVC NV E EL=21 A0 1, D LED \ ; , _ \0 /W (10'%10'SCREENED) / r ,,1s EXISIJ VARIANCE SOUGHT TO REDUCE REQUIRED HYDRANT&BUILOW6 �,,LA RISOP1 ���g N ,�' w GUARDRAIL L/S FROM 20'TO A NOMINAL PLANTER WATER SUPPLY / ' -••,�S°� f•S 5\ ,_ 5 o ' th• WIDTH AS SHOWN(5'AVERAGE MINIMUM) VICINITY MAP I �/ s'PLANTER ���I,.; ,`• Y 55 `\ `,TIN \£ TO TRANSITION GRADES AT ELEVATED f=2400(3) E. FH�y5/ g;• ,. erv� © '? �Sn GRADY WAY SITE DATA: -{.• �C (Y)}'/T\ SITE AREA 323 AC. 140025 ff l �� '� \(21 STORY CFFIS \ S O478'00 E ZONNG IM Er re R."El=2E 13' •, -0� - \ . > c�' S 14.69' FX OCCUPANCY B,SI,FI I2 PYC aIVN EL=31_°\ rt. p' 1 Adak/ \ G ONSMUCRON SN SPRM%IIITCO IT PVC IN,SEL=21,05' �./,•ct-' b:' 126.69' \ Sfi653'OB"E yam, SETBACKS r S ' /'' AM. , (S 2306'52'NJ', (PARCEL D) �. ulo' LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: FRONT zo'ARTERIAL.1s'OTHER �� • `__1C--1 t]=0196'11• INTERIOR S,fi00 SF FSDERO •• NONE' ' C4,l e ••4 �W, i (2)9'/10' _•�. R=1134.00' ✓1 NATURAL LEA 3.000 SF YSDEEA STREET 20'ARTERIAL IS'OTHER E%EDGE OF ASPHALT 1p pc4b e•`�' O` (I DOCK-HICK _—__,15 R�� L=21.83' (®POND) 3,600 SF PEAR NONE RELOCATE E%SIGNS \/-,.''y�• `' #`� __ ` C SETBACKS.(PRO0DED) AS REWIRED � 0. TC-IGy,10 A 321.59' � - /0 NORTH 60'(T)h R.O.W. (LEASE SPACE 13,936 SF) a �, a BUILDING HEIGHT: SOUTH 25'h R.O.W. / r_- _ -W� --- Ex COrsC + 32'-0'(-) EAST fi0'((h'h R.O.W. /, \,.. ,_,, (PARCEL C),, 5 ESL,,TO NEW EXPANSION' w WEST 60'(4)4 R.O W. EC PG1.ER �j. BE REMOVED 31,554 SF ffRWKLERO ��• 9.4 BUILDING AREA .• • SiIiCH , -.'t, EX Sx0 TO F.F.300 N £ EXISTING 10,329 SF 4 1,448 SF 2ND FIR ;:,b'066 C BE REMOVED,- SPRINKLER \T� FIRE LANE EXPANSION -31,554 SF 4 4,182 SF 2ND FIR //� _�II •`EI LONG `�.• COG.RAMP TENANT RISER 20' ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA- Ilift / ' F�•• 1 1 G SIaO;e ' z LANDING AN BASIC 8000 SF -L,7r,�— BLD.ER UNIT' C�14 14 WALL ' ''c _ SPRINKLER INCREASE 30%(I)STORY 'I`'J 11 FF 2]0 4'. SETBACK oV s�°� O 4 ,L El"5• ' (PARCEL B) �' h ALLOWABLE AREA 48,00 SF(1)STORY S 6911'09'E ./'= .'rS AA' . r'.F PAYED __ Jn 37 \ (2)STORY 10 () 11.12' -T / .`y'� A. f PERCENT SITE OVERAGE 29 BR SF 2 STORY R' ,1 I WALLA T \\ DFFlC4 X ` ��� I ' � � �' { E%GONG (SCHDBER INC.,SPACE \ 2,682 SF%2 PARKING REWIRED E II G MANSION Ex CB I'' .'''~ti 1 -- RAMPf9A6 17;618SF) DEET�6TCRAGE J.560 Si 1,5pp 3,20 6]30 S/300 RIV=25.51 •3;'NtiII1.7.-7E-6=k CANOPY A TO REMAIN \ ,�' / / /1._—IE=2231 1 , _ yLu`CH APEA N. 173.72' \\/ 5rTOTAL61 MFG 000 SE41,00 12,000 SF/1,000 __� N 56'18'25'E 1S 6653'OB'Wt ' / , (PARCEL A) ii,.-- - (BOIIER) :��//, 15.0• PARKING PROWOm 66 SPACES(4 H/C.10 COMPACT) ® ^,Ex M EXIST.PAVED AREA 18,20 SF EX Ib" Si',' •/ 2O30' '-2' 1. I EX. BUILDING MATCH �Ex Q+,'• - {' TOTAL PAYING/WW(5 40,996 ff FM , DETENTION O S / O y� • S�fy r`u i.• :j' POND/NANRAL ) !-! I0,329 SF FF 300 F.F. ��/\ `110P5� ✓ o41,�P e LANDSCAPING(25 I ,m (2)STORY EX OHD \�0'---,,_ `�� TOTAL IMPERNOUS f01,079 Y __ 4 OF SITE AREA) Q j �� PARCEL NUMBERS: \ •4, 16,146 SF TOTAL , •.. --N/C. ��UM11$OF EX DOCK �ti� //- ,=j., E%:5'mrn CHIC 242304-9037,242304-9174 2ND FLR� DOORS 8'/10'" ,!- / TRAFFIC CONTROL • _Hie 5(.29.75') RELOATE-' - ,J�/� ' E%'MIN _ 1 I 01 ///y,- tIALL.REMOVE A$ LOP=2582/ / \�Xt _ 1 I C k} EX.POWER - I `20'R.',� �/ NECESSARY DATUM: TOP/PIPE=2032 \5• y 'I C I � - i \> f �` w y C L"�•� xB J• ELEVATIONS REFER TO CITY OF RENTON DATUM(NAM)1988)AND ARE 1 '`X..\ W� _P__ \ 'EX I'' 1 fP /, BASED 0 ELEVATION 19.65,TOP CC MONUMENT IN CASE AT THE Ex=26 // R C:iANt V I I•• 01 INTERSECTION 6 OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST 7111 IE=2406 ~ro'� - H___.�' •,1. \' yam.• ';Y ___ a .' STREET AND LISTED AS BENCHMARK NO 1854 (EX I2- I� z � 5S. d. 4'pVC' EX EP p=O4'0'49' BENCHMARK SET FOR SITE USE AS FOLLOWS: 0=8849'46' A=2110'10" I ``� w" _•„, / 1 I-� UYI75 OF EX STAIR&l 8 0105T. PPE(�'4.• ,-,-- CONIC R=2308.0' BENCHMARK NO.1: A=352.11' Ex SSMH \ 7 ` II, AAA PAYNG TO / EX CANOPY\ / ,- L=181.82' TOP OF CHISELED SQUARE IN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL R=IS L=13010' RUM=26 OI • `�K6)•l `� ///��_ RELIOVED ��'/ f LIGHT CONCRETE PAD ABUTTING LIGHT POLE PAD,ON WEST SIDE OF L=23.26' ti \, �yyyjjj���I WYf'S1ER/RECYOE • .� '� IE=1951 EX EP � � -` �W t ''1 E41. TADRELOCATED MONSTER ROAD.175 FEET NORTH OF ME INTERSECTION 5.0 THIS AREA SUBJECT 70: \4/ �'2. 1 (9X9'SCREENED) , SCR NE FRONTAGE ROAD,ON THE NORTH SDE OF HIGHWAY 405,ELEV 25.02 EASEMENT LIGHTGRANTED TO PU ET SOUND Ex 8'PVC EN 12'W O,ysTf-- -.ia' z,� I. ii Exo ,., `631,' UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5861254 EX UP& RBq :Ex 0 '' -7 a1� S �S 34'00'J7'E GUY ANCHOR sy, ,'��; -I_ --p:-- "" 03• SCHDBER, INC. EXPANSION •1. _ Tm.� /,x 1400 MONSTER ROAD S.W. `��P_ N- _ of* CA ULILIIY POLE wIII AO WITH i EC DROP RENTON,WA Ex SSMH I �_ J X DON'T NORTH SIDE • _ .WAN POE Engineering, Inc. EM2042fi p=5951'00• NOTE: OWNER INFORMATION: 1,', N`W` OWL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING/CONSULTING R=59'51'' ''` + b 1314 8W Street N.E,SUITE 102 • Ex 6"PVC n DUSTING BUILDING IS REQUIRED HEGIRA LLC H AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98002 L=18384' `�V ¢ TO BE SPRINIO-EKED AS PART ATM:NR.OENNIS SCHDBER ! �g (253)833-4052/FAX(253)B33-4053 / OF THE EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION 1400 MONSTER ROAD SW. 'gc,SFENO4 CITY OF RENTON ER UTILITY POLEI -- RENTON,WA 98055 QpL PH(425)255-4000 I E 3/8/2. I DEPARTMENT or PUBLIC WORKS FAX(425)277-1872 VARIANCE SITE, L/S & UTILITY PLAN VARIANCE SITE, L/S & UTILITY PLAN I"=30' (PLAN NORTH) DESIGN: A F P. DATE:DEC 1999-FILE NO:99-077 DRAWN: GMO CHECKED, NEP. SCALE: 1•=30' row eoew_vAet_ DESCRIPTION BY REV.DATE APPROVED. 110019R 0 80991 ROAN 99[T AR W' 1 LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T23N, R4E, W.M. t ✓ �� RENTON, WASHINGTON :% 9, � RENTON '• \ ,,00 ^s. \'(� • �J•.< s - ,L, G- :. t`� 1\9 SITE Aipi - c8� ,'�• :�••`•'bt ', ac. A,e a�opy• ,N� p„ S°Q� \�`►" v0 1�� Ew_ TP'sS` \\•• \\ tl qi JN xeH�,.£. V4 �1, gam. t. ti@M �� r \ �." \ ',. ``•'�,` ,•z`is 's0 '•r0 .�e _ rl'��� gg �.. • � e© C°P °'' • • r. ry<i 1 eP'q o`a -�/ SOUTHCENIER F �\ a ys'f y,.d xr 'e.r tc yPytP 0 I ° .•y.✓n'�va' f ° 324 q,\ � �4 e \ �w.a nyr rr, a CP a TCR1:•'44:Cf•T;s N 7 S • °B e..e sP. � < f\e`$':�>., �./,.•^- \\ \ ;., . n<. n�t,.":,P�e.,-� ,s VICINITY MAP \<.,, a r,H: > . ra` • t' ° o \\`` \\ c<.<e..aLr;N�l'" s .<,.:e ^s- , eem== •{ '••<•",' _ .ae IX) �`" >re .,,,. `�a Lay' aD x \\>\C.'" 320\ \e ees,t P.S.P. NP Js�. I,td•y — tis— ✓\ypV\ \ V TO Y, F'gos s,J „qq.vy,y r'' ,k' ' IJ°k�,:\ A \ p: a-(ste. 9 rn— p°t e., Apa,�� \' $ 47' l \ ,\\\ mil\ ^Ny r•LETao ar rn.zq• `y,,� ° — ® 0. (iai,°,'N� e��'' \' '-�'e r et. u, �.. \� T4 \I;\ �.s Poet�� / % a sp• *°Ay:ti (a`" • �,:a''` •,y,'' \r� 31 °a Y 1 , / ;g"\ A� ;q 9 �y0 'JrQ Re.I• . s, �' ^ 30 �. / s 1 \ ,..°,—,+. .r zs, ,! ; fi 5q Cyyk ,�,°; '";,,1i,', yy 8' . I'�A` \;\\� y aS9>o, 1I I ;$ .,,• .'` \ Ar+ 'z�t1, �,a ,- •'di/ �,„qr d "ere/srt 1 / \ \ 1: u Ye` I II! \ '\� E�JN �J 1 ;i0 {/% y4e"M I,eee�/� ,ee'` 'I 1 G �d R„e• 1 R �. / ® Q/r�,p ife°°,eA f tON � \ \I .. \ o sy'„ s '."° e s lPyd °5 '> /`«/ > ,0.I'• j0r ,:A,.111'q '�,� � ,ee,' �I_=' _ r \ a. syye ae « y . ,,.oP-�R,ap,N CO`I�\ J. d °er• 1 /.`Ji/ -�°s is rl '✓��,< l°ill :9<90 \ \\.\'( / o �/ t j• 7 r P''°••�/ � ✓,�r �`e,�qrP -C �N� n C� \ 4 - 11 �wsao `'e ,�A' or'sa�a��'�JA,yr, sgs��A° •z:R I i OI o° • � p�T y✓I�`e '.04, V. y�tl` of 55 0 V ' r rl c Tz 5T• — .syaue'. / • I • / i —.\\ • . ta° a . ... jt .°sa sr e.s ro>xw 'o ' '% ,`�\ e �I'°•• `� SCH0L3cR AIRCRAFT 2MCeR1.ORS o �Sa2,. ___ _ \ ( iaa+e; I ' ' 14Do MomsTER. ROAD S.W. © FZEt� cN. tn/�► ";T ,„�,✓ • i'�� O N6, 02 Ito ; I t JOB TITLE �;a�,y^o�,y,A� �jP ��Q.s.�', ,, B �� _ -Z� SCHOBER, INC.AEXPANSION VARIANCE '�- ,' E PR e'I Zf °a r<+°'✓rvo°' 38.60 Ni • ate. 1400 MONSTER ROAD '✓ �' n ?p\MN No. o ✓.e ac. C\ 3 \ RENTON,WA "R\\ = -i<'r;"°.ee"',,°...`'. - s9 I /�'64 _N I °"J ,•F'• • 1 .`'i Ie• I0. v/ N N 9 p?;" F, �t,% CITY OF RENTON ( V V - W ;/ kWh." arut cM''` w DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS (�nko) s trtA9Br NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1"-100' DE9�' DAE:NARCN1997 ENO96-08 ORANN: GNO CHECKED: APM ,,:Ex: 1'=100' Ip5-1--PC¢. DESCRIPTION BY REV.DATE PPPROVEO: vl¢c_La.� p'BPClQr 6 PUBLIC MWI{5 1 • I , avt-ee 0.q 242304-9063-06 BATCH NUMBER: KS HUISH FAMILY FUN CENTERS 811407 BATCH NUMBER CUSTOMER NAME POE ENGINEERING 33208 PASEO CERVEZA#C CUSTOMER NAME SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 242304-9010-00 KC PARKS&REC. DEPT 8N0001 242304-9086-09 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC BATCH NUMBER C/O WILSON JOE PROPERTY MGT PROPERTY TAX D1EPT 790503 2040 84TH AVE SE PO BOX 90868 CUSTOMER NAME MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 242304-9028-00 — — — J BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE 242304-9106-05 TAX DEPT. 715175 MANUFACTURERS MINERAL CO S-1279 BATCH NUMBER 1700 EAST GOLF RD #400 1215 MONSTER RD SW ' CUSTOMER NAME SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 RENTON, WA'98065 242304-9127-00 - - —242304-9034-02 KC PARKS&REC DEPT. 8N0001 TUKWILA CITY OF 879700 C/O WILSON JOE PROPERTY MGT. BATCH NUMBER 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD#100 2040 84TH AVE SE CUSTOMER NAME TUKWILA, WA 98188 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 242304-9075-02 MANUFACTURERS MINERAL CO 1D9999 BATCH NUMBE BATCH NUMBER 1215 MONSTER ROAD sw ; CUSTOMER N CUSTOMER NAME RENTON, WA 98055 242304-9100-01 MANUFACTURERS MINERAL CO 6D9999 ; BATCH NUMBS BATCH NUMBER 1215 MONSTER ROAD sw CUSTOMER NAME CUSTOMER NAME RENTON, WA 98055 242304-9117-02 KING COUNTY 701724 BATCH NUMBER I BATCH NUMBER DEPT. AVE.#708 M/S 7ST OF NATURAL RESOURCES 506 2 CUSTOMER N CUSTOMER NAME SEATTLE, WA 98104 - -- — 242304-9134-01 SCHOBER INC. 709800 BATCH NUMBER BATCH NUMBER 1400 MONSTER RD SW CUSTOMER NAME CUSTOMER NAME RENTON, WA 98055 242304-9027-01 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE ' BATCH NUMBER BATCH NUMBER TAX DEPT. 715175 1700 EAST GOLF RD #400 CUSTOMER NAME I CUSTOMER NAME SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 242304-9029-09 O W R R&NAV CO. 201303 BATCH NUMBER BATCH NUMBER % UNION PACIFIC RR CORP PO BOX 2500 CUSTOMER NAME CUSTOMER NAME BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 - I I I d; IT` DF.RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Z 433 702 010 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) Se E • Street&Nynber January 27, 2000 ! gA& Po ftice late,&ZIP Code 200 CERTIFIED MAIL NO.Z433 702 010 Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Mr.Alan Poe • L0 RetumReceiptShowingto Poe Engineering, Inc. Whom&Date Delivered 1314—8th Street NE, Suite 102 o Return ReceiptShowingto Whom Auburn, WA 98002 a Date,&Addressee's Address O TOTAL Postage&Fees $ SUBJECT: Schober Expansion Cr) PostmarkorDate Project No. LUA-99-184,V-B J �J�Dear Mr. Poe: + � �� --- 5, The Renton Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting on January 26, 2000, granted your request for a variance from City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-2-130.A. The variance will allow a 5- foot landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way, in lieu of the 20-foot wide landscape strip required by the development regulations. The variance is approved with no conditions: - This is the only variance granted under this application and all other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code will apply. An Appeal of the Board's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within twenty one (21) days from the date of issuance of the decision. The date on which a land use decision is issued is considered to be three days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The Board of Adjustment decision will become final on February 17, 2000, if the decision is not appealed to Superior Court. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Renton Board of Adjustment,d-oiox.& Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Vectra, LLC/Owners BOACRANT - 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Y i CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HARING MINUTES January 26, 2000 The following minutes are a summary of the January 26, 2000 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Briere led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Board of Adjustment to order. ROLL CALL OF BOARDMEMBERS Jay Wallace; Ralph Evans; George Feighner,Terri Briere; Jim Jacques. Motion made and passed to excuse Boardmember Greg Guillen. CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE Karen'Codiga, Recording Secretary; Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES There were no official Minutes as the December 7, 1999 hearing was cancelled because the applicant withdrew their request for variance. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Board Chairperson Briere opened the public hearing. Lesley Nishihira presented the staff report for Schober Expansion Variance, LUA-99-184,V. Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Site Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Proposed Site Plan Map Exhibit No. 4: Elevation Map Project Description The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot landscape width. The subject site is located in the Medium Industrial (I ) Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less (Section 4-2-130A). SW Grady Way is classified as a principal arterial on the City of Renton Arterial Streets map. This landscape standard would apply only to the site's frontage on SW Grady Way. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approximately 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This same variance proposal was previously approved by the Board of Adjustments.in April 1997. Variances are valid for a 2-year period and the variance approval expired prior to site construction. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 26,2000 Page 2 The variance is sought by Schober, Inc. to allow foir expansion of their existing manufacturing facility. The existing building (12,429 square feet) is used to- manufacture decorative laminates for the aviation, recreation, and transportation industries. Expansion plans are for a new 27,680 square foot building for production equipment and raw material inventory. The existing building is located in the middle of the triangular-shaped site and accessed,from Monster Road/ SW 16th Street. The shape of the property constrains the available site area for building expansion. The proposed building expansion would be situated along the south property boundary and the building would back onto SW Grady Way. The applicant is providing a 20 foot wide fire lane on the south side of the building and then proposing a 5 foot wide landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady War. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides (SW Jackson St., Longacres Parkway, SW 1 6tn St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. The subject site has split zoning;while most of the site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM)the southeast corner of the site is zoned Public Use (P-1). This is a remnant from when the P-1 zone was applied to the Metro treatment plant site. City staff is initiating a rezone to IM on the property. The applicant will require approval of the rezone prior to construction of the proposed building expansion. The proposed building expansion would also require SEPA environmental review prior to approval of building permits. Site Plan Review is also required for development in the Valley Planning Area. Variance Criteria City Code section 4-7-22.G.3 states the conditions under which a variance may be granted. Those conditions are listed below with discussion following each of the variance criteria. 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The landscape requirement is intended to provide for a continuous, perimeter landscape strip fronting arterial streets. The landscape g is intended to function as a landscape buffer between the public street and site development and to provide for an aesthetic streetscape. However, in this specific application, SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway running contiguous and parallel to Interstate 405, approximately 20 to 24 feet above the subject site. Therefore, the required landscaping woulp not be visible from the elevated roadway and the landscaping would not provide the function intended by the code provision. Expansion of the existing facility on the site is constrained by the shape of the site. The subject parcel has a triangular shape an�the south portion is the only area of the site with sufficient width to accommodate the ne proposed building. A 20-foot wide fire lane is required around the south side of the building, which backs on SW Grady Way. The applicant contends that there may not be sufficient developable area on the site for the planned expansion'if the applicant is required to provide for the on-site landscape frontage strip in addition to the required fire lane. The elevated roadway (SW Grady Way) adjacent to the site frontage and the triangular shape of the property which constrains the potential building expansion area are both special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustments may determine that the variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of'the Zoning Code would deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. T Board of Adjustment Minutes January 26,2000 Page 3 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The landscape strip requirement applies to the site's property frontage along SW Grady Way. SW Grady Way and Interstate 405 form a barrier to adjacent properties to the south. Therefore, there are no properties across SW Grady Way or abutting the subject site that would view and gain benefit from the required landscape strip. Because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where adjacent to t e site, the landscape strip also would not be visible from the elevated arterial. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the landscape requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Special circumstances apply to the subject site because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where abutting the site. This condition or special circumstance does not apply to adjacent properties or to many other properties with site frontage along SW Grady Way. . Therefore, the granting of a variance would not set a precedent applicable to other properties. A variance from the landscape requirement would not constitute a granting of special privilege from the zoning requirements that is inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity or zone. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Because of the triangular shape of the subject parcel, the south portion of the lot is the only area with sufficient lot width to accommodate the proposed building expansion. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency access. The applicant contends that the 20-foot landscape requirement would further limit the buildable area and make expansion of the existing facility, economically infeasible on the site. The applicant is p'oposing a 5-foot wide landscape strip instead of the 20-foot width required by the code. This landscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the property line. Approval of the variance may be considered the minimum variance from the requirement that would be necessary to allow the applicant to expand the existing development on the property and accomplish their desired purpose. AUDIENCE COMMENT/TESTIMONY: Chairperson Briere asked for testimony from the applicant: Mr.Alan Poe Poe Engineering, Inc. 1314—8th Street NE,Suite 102 Auburn,WA 98002 Mr. Poe stated that he had nothing to add, however, he was available for any questions the.Board may have. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 26, 2000 Page 4 Boardmembers having no questions, Chairperson Briere asked for any further testimony regarding this proposed variance. There being none, Chairperson Briere closed the public hearing. DECISION: It was moved and seconded to approve the variance as requested for LUA-99-184-V, based on the attached findings of fact,conclusion and decision dated January 26,2000. VOTE: All in favor; no opposed. Chairperson Briere announced: The variance is hereby granted as proposed and outlined in the findings of fact and conclusions. The variance is from the City of Renton Development Regulations, • Section 4-2-130A, to allow a 5-foot landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way, in lieu of the 20-foot wide landscape strip required by the development regulations. The variance is approved with no conditions. DATED this 26th day of January, 2000. • An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I,which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3)days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on February 20,2000 PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Lesley Nishihira presented the staff report for Avalon Ridge Apartments Sign Variance, LUA-99-190-V. Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Proposed Site Plan Map Exhibit No.4: Elevation Map Project Description The applicant, Avalon Bay Communities, is requesting approval of a variance from the Sign Regulations in order to reduce the required 10-foot setback from a street right-of-way to 4 feet, 7 inches. The proposal is for a 25.5 square foot(3-foot by 8Y2-foot) sign to be mounted on a stone monument. The monument would be 15 feet in width and 6 feet in height, totaling 90 square feet in size. The signage is intended to add a sense Of identity for the existing 17-acre multi-family rental community. The project includes the use of approximately 25 cubic yards of.soil, as well as colorful landscaping to accent the proposed signage. The subject site is located in the Residential Mutli-Family Infill (RM-I) zoning designation. The Sign Regulations identify specific development standards for apartment signs located in residential zones. RMC section 4-4-100E4a limits apartment developments to two identifying signs of no more than 32 square feet in size and not to exceed 6 feet in height. The regulations also require that all freestanding signs maintain a 10-foot setback from street rights-of-way Board of Adjustment Minutes • January 26, 2000 Page 5 and/or a 5-foot setback from any side property life. With the exception of the required street setback, the proposed sign complies with all requi ements of the City's Sign Regulations and the development standards of the RM-I zone. The proposed sign would be located on the southwest corner of.SW Sunset Boulevard and Stevens Avenue SW— the site's north and east property lines respectively. The sign, which is angled towards the center of the street intersection, is within 4 feet, 7 inches of the north property line at its west end. On its east end, the sign wou d have a setback of approximately 8 feet from the property line. Variance Criteria City Code section 4-7-22.G.3 states the conditions under which a variance may be granted. Those conditions are listed below with discussion following each of the variance criteria. 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the Zoning Code is foutlid to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The subject property slopes up to its SW Sunset Boulevard street frontage,which is elevated approximately 20 feet above the site's average finished grade. The topography of the property is a special or unusual circumstahce in that the actual portion of the property that is on the same grade as street level is minimal. Furthermore, the setback requirement is intended to provide for a continuous setback for streets and to provide a buffer between the public street and site development in order to establish an aesthetic streetscape. In this specific application, the actual location of the sidewalk and street paving is a distance of approximately 15 feet from the proposed location of the monument sign. This existing landscaped buffer between the site's property line and the edge of the sidewalk satisfies the intent of the code provision. The applicant contends the placement of the sign according to code requirements would create an undue hardship. Compliance with the required setback would prohibit the sign's visibility from the right-of-way. In order to avoid the severely limited visibility of the sign, the applicant would be forced to consider the use of extensive retaining walls, including alterations to the existing slopes and vegetation,to construct acceptable signage. The difference in topography between the site's average finished grade and the elevation of the adjacent roadway(SW Sunset Boulevard)limits the area for potential signage and can be considered special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustment may determine that the variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The requested variance would allow for a freestanding monument sign on the north side of an existing multi-family development. The proposed monument sign would be a maximum of 6 feet in height with a total sign area of 25.5 square feet. Due to its proximity to the controlled intersection, the applicant contends the proposed sign would not create a hazard to automotive or pedestrian traffic. Th1e sign code prohibits signage within 20 feet of Board of Adjustment Minutes January 26, 2000 Page 6 intersections or driveways that obscures vision between the height of 3 to 10 feet of the street or driveway grade (a.k.a., "clear vision area"). The proposed sign location would not obscure or impair visibility within the clea vision area and would also comply with all other sign code and RM-I development stand rds, with the exception of the reduced setback requested with this variance application. The location and size of the sign would not have a detrimental affect on public welfare nor would it have negative affects on the subject property or properties in the vicinity. The proposed sign would not block views or adversely affect sight distance. The proposed sign would be beneficial to the public and vistors to the apartments in terms of identifying the residential complex and distinguishing it from adjacent properties. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the setback requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: It is an unusual circumstance or condition for a property and business to lack adequate street frontage necessary for a freestanding sign. Adjacent properties in the vicinity of the subject site are designated with commercial zones. These zones are permitted to locate signage within the required setbacks, provided the clear vision area is not obscured. The approval of the variance would allow signage that would be comparable to that which is permitted on adjacent properties. Special circumstances apply to the subject site due to the unusual topography, which limits the site's frontage on SW Sunset Boulevard. There are few properties that have a similar lot configuriation and a comparative situation. Therefore, the approval of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege over other properties in the vicinity and zone. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant contends the approval of the variance would reduce impacts to existing site conditions by eliminating the need for extensive retaining walls and clearing. The signage would also serve to improve the sense of community within the overall neighborhood. Due to the unusual topography of the subject parcel, the only area sufficient for signage to be visible to the street right-of-way is within the required setback distance. The proposed sign is minimal in terms of sign area and sign height to provide for the clear identification of the residential development. The proposal may be considered the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the objectives of the applicant. AUDIENCE COMMENT/TESTIMONY: Chairperson Briere asked for testimony from the applicant: Mr. Dave Kirzinger Avalon Bay Communities, Inc. 11808 Northup Way,Suite W311 Bellevue,WA 98005 Mr. Kirzinger had nothing to add, however, stated that he was available for any questions from the Boardmembers. Board of Adjustment Minutes January 26,2000 Page 7 Boardmembers having no questions, Chairperson Briere asked for any further testimony regarding this proposed variance. There being none, Chairperson Briere closed the public hearing. DECISION: It was moved and seconded to approve the variance as requested for LUA-99-190-V,Avalon Ridge Apartments Sign Variance, based on the attached findings of fact, conclusion and decision dated January 26,2000. VOTE: All in favor; no opposed. Chairperson Briere announced: The variance is hereby granted as proposed and outlined in the findings of fact and conclusions. The variance is from the City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-4-100E4a,to allow a reduced sign setback along the site's street frontages as depicted in the submitted site plan, in lieu.of the 10-foot setback equired by the sign regulations. The variance is approved with no conditions. DATED this 26th day of January,2000. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section G, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superi r Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after the City mails a written decision. The ap•eal period for this variance will end at 5:00 .PM on February 20, 2000. Chairperson Briere closed the public hearing. 6. OLD BUSINESS: 7. NEW BUSINESS: Election of Vice Chairperson. Jim Jacques was elected to serve another one-year term as Vice-Chair. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 9. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded to adjourn. Meeting adjourned. \ -32."(///14 011-14.2 Terri Briere Chairperson BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Schober Expansion No. LUA-99-184,V-B FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance from a landscape requirement of the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Section 4-2-130A Of the City of Renton Development Regulations requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The site fronts on SW Grady Way along the south property boundary. SW Grady Way is classified as a principal arterial on the City of Renton Arterial Streets map. The landscape standard therefore applies to the site's frontage on SW Grady Way. 2. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approximately 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the subject site. 3. The variance is sought by Schober, Inc. to allow for expansion of their existing manufacturing facility. The existing building (12,429 square feet) is used to manufacture decorative laminates for the aviation, recreation, and transportation industries. Expansion plans are for a new 27,680 square foot building for production equipment and raw material inventory. The existing building is located in the middle of the triangular-shaped site and accessed from Monser Road/SW 16th Street. The shape of the property constrains the available site area for building expansion. The proposed building expansion would be located along the south property boundary and the building would back onto SW Grady Way. 4. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot wide fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency fire access. If the applicant were also required to provide a 20-foot landscape strip along the south property frontage of SW Grady Way, the site area available for building expansion would be greatly diminished. 5. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot wide landscape strip in lieu of the required 20-foot landscape strip. This landscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the property line 6. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides (SW Jackson St., Longacres Parkway, SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required,landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. 7. This same variance proposal was previously approved by the Board of Adjustments in April 1997. Variances are valid for a 2-year period and the variance approval expired prior to site construction. 8. The subject site has split zoning; while most of the rite is zoned Medium Industrial (IM)the southeast corner of the site is zoned Public Use (P-1). This is a remnant from when the P-1 zone was applied to the Metro treatment plant site. City staff is initiating a rezone to IM on the property. The applicant will require approval of the rezone prior to construction of the proposed building expansion. The proposed building expansion would also require SEPA environmental review prior to approval of building permits. Site Plan Review is also required for development in the Valley Planning Area. decision,findings a CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT,THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: Development Regulations Section 4-9-250.B.5. =:The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The landscape requirement is intended to provide for a continuous, perimeter landscape strip fronting arterial streets. The landscaping is intended to function as a landscape buffer between the public street and site development and to provide for an aesthetics streetscape. However, in this specific application, SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway running contiguous and parallel to Interstate 405, approximately 20 to 24 feet above the subject site. Therefore, the required landscaping would not be visible from the elevated roadway and the landscaping would not provide the function intended by the code provision. Expansion of the existing facility on the site is constrained by the shape of the site. The subject parcel has a triangular shape and the south portion is the only area of the site with sufficient width to accommodate the new proposed building. A 20-foot wide fire lane is required around the south side of the building, which backs on SW Grady Way. The applicant contends that there may not be sufficient developable area on the site for the planned expansion if the applicant is required to provide for the on-site landscape frontage strip in addition to the required fire lane. The elevated roadway (SW Grady Way) adjacent to the site frontage and the triangular shape of the property which constrains the potential building expansion area are both special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustments may determine that the variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The landscape strip requirement applies to the si ie's property frontage along SW Grady Way. SW Grady Way and Interstate-405 form a barrier to adjacent properties to the south. Therefore, there are no properties across SW Grady Way or abutting the subject site that would view and gain benefit from the required landscape strip. Because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where adjacent to the site, the landscape strip also would not be visible from the elevated arterial. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the landscape requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. 3) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Special circumstances apply to the subject site beecause SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where abutting the site. This condition or special circumstance does not apply to adjacent properties or to many other properties with site frontage along SW Grady Way. Therefore, the granting of a variance would not set a precedent applicable to other properties. P variance from the landscape requirement would not constitute a granting of special privilege from the zoning requirements that is inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity or zone. decision,findings J 4) That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Because of the triangular shape of the subject parcel, the south portion of the lot is the only area with sufficient lot width to accommodate the proposed building expansion. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency access. The applicant contends that the 20-foot landscape requirement would further lim't the buildable area and make expansion of the existing facility economically infeasible on the site. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot wide landscape strip instead of the 20-foot width required by the code. This landscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the prloperty line. Approval of the variance may be considered the minimum variance from the requirement that would be necessary to allow the applicant to expand the existing development on the property and accomplish their desired purpose. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: The variance is hereby granted from the City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-2-130A, to allow a 5-foot landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way, in lieu of the 20-foot wide landscape strip required by the development regulations. The va-lance is approved with no conditions. DATED this 26th day of January, 2000. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on February 20, 2000. 0 R-be- e),&A- 0 -er4.--•-- Greg Guillen George Feigh er AR70,7A-ae' i'l Teri riere lace IV Ja Ilace4434.4ell.i_A- 4/Evans ItA241,4 - decision,findings . • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Avalon Ridge Apartments Sign Variance No. LUA-99-190,V-B FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, Avalon Bay Communities, is requesting approval of a variance from section 4-4-100E4a of the Sign Regulations in order to reduce the required 10-foot setback from a street right-of-way to 4 feet, 7 inches. . 2. The proposal is for a 25.5 square foot (3-foot by 81/2-foot) sign to be mounted on a stone monument. The monument would be 15 feet in width and 6 feet in height, totaling 90 square feet in size. 3. The subject site is located in the Residential Mutli-Family Infill (RM-I) zoning designation. The subject property slopes up to its SW Sunset Boulevard street frontage, which is elevated approximately 20 feet above the site's average finished grade. 4. The proposed sign would be located on the southwest corner of SW Sunset Boulevard and Stevens Avenue SW —the site's north and east property lines respectively. The sign, which is angled towards the center of the street intersection, is within 4 feet, 7 inches of the north property line at its west end. On its east end, the sign would have a setback of approximately 8 feet from the property line. 5. In this specific application, the actual location of the sidewalk and street paving is a distance of approximately 15 feet from the proposed location bf the monument sign. 6. The Sign Regulations identify specific development standards for apartment signs located in residential zones. RMC section 4-4-100E4a limits apartment developments to two identifying signs of no more than 32 square feet in size and not to exceed 6 feet in height. The regulations also require that all freestanding signs maintain a 10-foot setback from street rights-of-way and/or a 5-foot setback from any side property line. 7. With the exception of the required street setback, the proposed sign complies with all requirements of the City's Sign Regulations and the development standards of the RM-I zone. 8. The sign code prohibits signage within 20 feet of intersections or driveways that obscures vision between the height of 3 to 10 feet of the street or driveway grade (a.k.a., "clear vision area"). The proposed sign location would not obscure or impair visibility within the clear vision area. 9. Adjacent properties in the vicinity of the subject �ite are designated with commercial zones. These zones are permitted to locate signage within the required setbacks, provided the clear vision area is not obscured. decfind 0 CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT,THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: _ Development Regulations Section 4-9-250B5 — The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The subject property slopes up to its SW Sunset Boulevard street frontage, which is elevated approximately 20 feet above the site's average finished grade. The topography of the property is a special or unusual circumstance in that the actual portion of the property that is on.the same grade as street level is minimal. Furthermore, the setbac requirement is intended to provide for a continuous setback for streets and to provide a buffer between the public street and site development in order to establish an aesthetic streetscape. In this specifiic application, the actual location of the sidewalk and. street paving is a distance of approximately 15 feet from the proposed location of the monument sign. This existing landscaped buffer between the site's property line and the edge of the sidewalk satisfies the intent of the code provision. The applicant contends the placement of the sign according to code requirements would create an undue hardship. Compliance with the required setback would prohibit the signs visibility from the right-of-way. In order to avoid the severely limited visibility of the sign, the applicant would be forced to consider the use of extensive retaining walls, including alterations to the existing slopes and vegetation, to construct acceptable signage. The difference in topography between the site's average finished grade and the elevation of the adjacent roadway (SW Sunset Boulevard) limits the area for potential signage and can be considered special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustment may determine that the variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the eubject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be raterially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The requested variance would allow for a freestanding monument sign on the north side of an existing multi-family development. The proposed monument sign would be a maximum of 6 feet in height with a total sign area of 25.5 square feet. Due to its proximity to the controlled intersection, the applicant contends the proposed sign would not create a hazard to automotive or pedestrian traffic. The sign code prohibits signage within 20 feet of intersections or driveways that obscures vision between the height of 3 to 10 feet of the street or driveway grade (a.k.a., "clear vision area"). The proposed sign location would not obscure or impair visibility within the clear vision area and would also comply with all other sign code and RM-I development standards, with the exception of the reduced setback requested with this variance application. The location and size of the sign would not have a detrimental affect on public welfare nor would it have negative affects on the subject property or properties in the vicinity. The proposed sign would not block views or adversely affect sight distance. The proposed sign would be beneficial to the public and visitors to the apartments in terms of identifying the residential complex and distinguishing it from adjacent properties. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the setback requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. decfind . . 1 N • 3) That approval shall not constitute a grant f special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: It is an unusual circumstance or condition for a property and business to lack adequate street frontage necessary for a freestanding sign. Adjacent properties in the vicinity of the subject site are designated with commercial zones. These zones are permitted to locate signage within the required setbacks, provided the clear vision area is not obscured. The approval of the variance would allow signage that would be comparable to that which is permitted on adjacent properties. Special circumstances apply to the subject site due to the unusual topography, which limits the site's frontage on SW Sunset Boulevard. There are few properties that have a similar lot configuration and a comparative situation. Therefore, the approval of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege over other properties in the vicinity and zo e. 4) That the aiSiroval as determined by the Boa d of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplishithe desired purpose: The applicant contends the approval of the variance would reduce impacts to existing site conditions by eliminating the need for extensive retaining walls and clearing. The signage would also serve to improve the sense of community within the overall neighborhood. Due to the unusual topography of the subject parcel, the only area sufficient for signage to be visible to the street right-of-way is within the required setback distance. The proposed sign is minimal in terms of sign area and sign height to provide for the clear identification of the residential development. The proposal may be considered the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the objectives of the applicant. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: The variance is hereby granted from the City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-4-100E4a, to allow a reduced sign setback along the site's street froptages as depicted in the submitted site plan, in lieu of the 10-foot setback required by the sign regulations. The variance is approved with no conditions. 0 DATED this 26th day of January, 2000. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section G,which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King.County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on February 20, 2000. Greg uillenG . George Feig er ‘Jf/ Teri Briere im Ja ues J llace J _4A ,./4,4 • R vans decfind .SEND,ER:: . - l also wish to receive the follow- rn., ❑Complete items:T and/or 2 for additional services. ing services(for an extra fee): 0" Complete'items 3,4a,and 4b. • ❑Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that card to you. 1• ❑Addressee's Address we can return this c°'i O ❑Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not a, permit. I 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery 0 in .c 0 Write°Retum Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece belowrthe article number. - ❑The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date o delivered. O d 3.Article Addressed to: 4a. 'cle Number 0 v cc Mr. Alan Poe a 10 pvo o E 4b.Servicd Type Poe Engineering, Inc. Registered ❑CertifiedCicil • cn w 1314 -- 8th Street NE. . . , 0 Express Mail ❑InsuredEn CC Suite #102N 0Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑COD °a Auburn, WA 98002 7.DateofDelivery w g cc z JAN 2 8 2000 W 5.R eived By: ( t Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested and c fee is paid) m r 0 b`. tgn ure Addressee rAgent) a o • ::: :: :: ; : ;I; is i i t i i i i i i i i i i i Ili i i i i PS Form 3811,bece�nbbr 1994 t t •t t t i i''' ' to2595-s9-tii-o223 .Domestic Return Receipt BOARD OF ADJUSTMEN OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Scho er Expansion No. LUA-99-184,V-B FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance from a landscape requirement of the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. Section 4-2-130A of the City of Renton Development Regulations requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The site fronts on SW Grady Way along the south prop rty boundary. SW Grady Way is classified as a principal arterial on the City of Renton Arterial Streets map The landscape standard therefore applies to the site's frontage on SW Grady Way. 2. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approximately 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the subject site. 3. The variance is sought by Schober, Inc. to allow f r expansion of their existing manufacturing facility. The existing building. (12,429 square feet) is used o manufacture decorative laminates for the aviation, recreation, and transportation industries. Expansion plans are for a new 27,680 square foot building for production equipment and raw material inventor}. The existing building is located in the middle of the triangular-shaped site and accessed from Mons er Road/SW 16th Street. The shape of the property constrains the available site area for building a pansion. The proposed building expansion would be located along the south property boundary and the building would back onto SW Grady Way. 4. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot wide fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency fire access. If the applicant were also required to rovide a 20-foot landscape strip along the south property frontage of SW Grady Way, the site area available for building expansion would be greatly diminished. 5. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot wide landscape strip in lieu of the required 20-foot landscape strip. This landscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the property line 6. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides (SW Jackson St., Longacres Parkway, SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. 7. This same variance proposal was previously approved by the Board of Adjustments in April 1997. Variances are valid for a 2-year period and the variance approval expired prior to site construction. 8. The subject site has split zoning; while most of the site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM)the southeast corner of the site is zoned Public Use (P-1). This is a remnant from when the P-1 zone was applied to the Metro treatment plant site. City staff is initiating a redone to IM on the property. The applicant will require approval of the rezone prior to construction of th proposed building expansion. The proposed building expansion would also require SEPA environmental review prior to approval of building permits. Site Plan Review is also required for development in the Valley Planning Area. . decision,findings CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT,THE BOARD MAI<ES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: Development Regulations Section 4-9-250.B.5.— The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditid.s specified below have been found to exist: 1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship al d the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The landscape requirement is intended to provide for a continuous, perimeter landscape strip fronting arterial streets. The landscaping is intended to function as a landscape buffer between the public street and site development and to provide for an aesthetic Istreetscape. However, in this specific application, SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway running contig ous and parallel to Interstate 405, approximately 20 to 24 feet above the subject site. Therefore, the req fired landscaping would not be visible from the elevated roadway and the landscaping would not provide the function intended by the code provision. Expansion of the existing facility on the site is constrained by the shape of the site. The subject parcel has a triangular shape and the south portion is the only area of the site with sufficient width to accommodate the new proposed building. A 20-foot wide fire lane is required around the south side of the building, which backs on SW Grady Way. The applicant contends that there may not be sufficient developable area on the site for the planned expansion if the applicant is required to provide for the on-site landscape frontage strip in addition to the required fire lane. The elevated roadway (SW Grady Way) adjacent to the site frontage and the triangular shape of the property which constrains the potential building expansion area are both special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustments may determine that the variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The landscape strip requirement applies to the site's property frontage along SW Grady Way. SW Grady Way and Interstate-405 form a barrier to adjacent properties to the south. Therefore, there are no properties across SW Grady Way or abutting the subject site that would view and gain benefit from the required landscape strip. Because SW Grady Wa is an elevated roadway where adjacent to the site, the landscape strip also would not be visible from the elevated arterial. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the landscape requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. 3) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Special circumstances apply to the subject site because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where abutting the site. This condition or special circumstance does not apply to adjacent properties or to many other properties with site frontage along SW Grady Way. Therefore, the granting of a variance would not set a precedent applicable to other properties. A variance from the landscape requirement would not constitute a granting of special privilege from the zoning requirements that is inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity or zone. decision,findings 4) That the approval as determined by the Bo rd of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Because of the triangular shape of the subject parcel, the south portion of the lot is the only area with sufficient lot width to accommodate the proposed uilding expansion. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency access. The applicant contends that the 20-foot landscape requirement would further limit the buildable area and make expansion of the existing facility economically infeasible on the site. The applicant is proposing a 5-foot wide landscape strip instead of the 20-foot width required by the code. This la idscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the property line. Approval of the variance may be considered the minimum variance from the requirement that would be necessary to allow the applicant to expand the existing development on the property and accomplish their desired purpose. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: The variance is hereby granted from the City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-2-130A, to allow a 5-foot landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way, in lieu of the 20-foot wide landscape strip required by the development regulations. The variance is approved with no conditions. DATED this 26th day of January, 2000. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on February 20, 2000. i\-bA \21 , .---erZt---`-- - Greg Guillen George Feigh er n :157AJA-( Teri riere klilVa c6.-CSAjC./C1-. d 5-Alz---1_______------ 44,441€1114- Ja Ilace Evans i f decision,findings 4 t - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT" • JANUARY 26, 2000. A. BACKGROUND APPLICANT: A an Poe, Poe Engineering • PROJECT NAME Schober Expansion I APPLICATION NO.: LUA99-184,V-B • , SUMMARY OF REQUEST:" • The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance from a street frontage landscape standard of the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. :.The IM zone requires a minimum 20-foot landscape width along arterial streets. TI{is standard would apply to.the site's .frontage on SW Grady Way. SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway along • the site frontage. The applicant proposes a 5-foot " landscape width LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: .1400 Monster Road - LOCATED IRNE NON. N NN RIF W.N. t °,C,, •;;\-- ,:,V..__.,i':,, • � , „,. � `t '''-',:is: a �". ` t 1 ^,.ii.•. rH '',„wH111111 VICINITY NAP,' • ,:,,‘,., ,,.:_ , /I:,;'"..,: .,..,„;";„::,...,,.:,..i, _,, 1,pf.,..,.,,t,I.::_,,.„,4544,,...2",,_. „42..,:: E .RIB \`\ \�,,.5, �O%... ,x //,}' v o l'^ / sn.wos —. �ti oR (/��`fJ•:.%Y"_j� �;\ ,l / A,•,• ! �;�, %gym"x'I'• '.r.`"" ^.�h ' —:\\ \• 'SEW - .;/ 1 � i'l ,^ ��' ;....,,,. / ,...•. „^ I a e" j �; "a i 1, ✓;-/' SCHOBER AIRCRAFT 114TERIORS ?-,; % ,�y"r' " -i^- 11# s1.•.: j, I 1400 MONSTER ROAD S.W. c," •::.4.`"... f- �R: RENTcN . WA YY 40 II1° SCHORER,INC.EXPANSION ',�,L>'�.✓u,. S�yr%s` 'y � SCHON won VARIANCE / E"".. �,.. � •a�, ,fir I 0 �•� � � oCY''''s1:71717frni i NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL NAP NEIGHBORHOOD xFlpxeoexoap DETAIL YAP 1„=100' VARREPORT.doc BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT hober Expansion LUA-99-184,V-B JANUARY 26,2000 Page 2 of 4 B. BACKGROUND Project Description The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20'-foot width to a 5-foot landscape width. The subject site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) Zone Which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less (Section 4-2-130A). SW Grady Way is classified as a principal arterial on the City of Renton Arterial Streets map. This landscape standard would apply only to the site's frontage on SW Grady Way. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approximately 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This same variance proposal was previously approved by the Board of Adjustments in April 1997. Variances are valid for a 2-year period and the variance approval expired prior to site construction. The variance is sought by Schober, Inc. to allow for expansion of their existing manufacturing facility. The existing building (12,429 square feet) is used to manufacture decorative laminates for the aviation, recreation, and transportation industries. Expansion plans are for a new 27,680 square foot building for production equipment and raw material inventory. The existing building is located in the middle of the triangular-shaped site and accessed from Monster Road/ SW 16th Street. The shape of the property constrains the available site area for building expansion. The proposed building expansion would be situated along the south property boundary and the building would back onto SW Grady Way. The applicant is providing a 20 foot wide fire lane on the south side of the building and then proposing a 5 foot wide landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way. The site is bounded by public streets on all sides (SW Jackson St., Longacres Parkway, SW 16th St., Monster Road SW, elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way. The subject site has split zoning; while most of the site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM) the southeast corner of the site is zoned Public Use (P-1). This is a remnant from when the P-1 zone was applied to the Metro treatment plant site. City staff is initiating a rezone to IM on the property. The applicant will require approval of the rezone prior to construction of the proposed building expansion. The proposed building expansion would also require SEPA environmental review prior to approval of building permits. Site Plan Review is also required for development in the Valley Planning Area. C. VARIANCE CRITERIA City Code 4-722, G-3: The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject proiperty owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The landscape requirement is intended to provide for a continuous, perimeter landscape strip fronting arterial streets. The landscapirilg is intended to function as a landscape buffer between the public street and site development and to provide for an aesthetic streetscape. However, in this specific application, SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway running contiguous and parallel to Interstate 405, approximately 20 to 24 feet above the subject site. Therefore, the required VARREPORT.doc BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT hober Expansion LUA-99-184,V-B JANUARY 26,2000 Page 3 of 4 landscaping would not be visible from the elevated roadway and the landscaping would not provide the function intended by the code provision. Expansion of the existing facility on tt�e site is constrained by the shape of the site. The subject parcel has a triangular shape and the south portion is the only area of the site with sufficient width to accommodate the new proposed building. A 20-foot wide fire lane is required around the south side of the building, which backs on SW Grady Way. The applicant contends that there may not be sufficient developable area on the rite for the planned expansion if the applicant is required to provide for the on-site landscape frontage strip in addition to the required fire lane. The elevated roadway (SW Grady Way) adjacent to the site frontage and the triangular shape of the property which constrains the potential building expansion area are both special circumstances or characteristics of the site. The Board of Adjustments may determine that the 'variance is necessary due to these specific circumstances that apply to the subject property, and that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2. That the granting of the variance wall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The landscape strip requirement applies to the site's property frontage along SW Grady Way. SW Grady Way and Interstate 405 form a barrier to adjacent properties to the south. Therefore, there are no properties across SW G lady Way or abutting the subject site that would view and gain benefit from the required landscape strip. Because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where adjacent to the site, the landscape strip also would not be visible from the elevated arterial. Therefore, the granting of the variance from the landscape requirement would not have an adverse visual affect on adjacent property improvements and the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or zone. 3. That approval shall not constitute) a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Special circumstances apply to the subject site because SW Grady Way is an elevated roadway where abutting the site. This condition or special circumstance does not apply to adjacent properties or to many other properties with site frontage along SW Grady Way. Therefore, the granting of a variance would not set a precedent applicable to other properties. A variance from the landscape requirement would not constitute a granting of special privilege from the zoning requirements that is inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity or zone. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Because of the triangular shape of the subject parcel, the south portion of the lot is the only area with sufficient lot width to accommodate the proposed building expansion. The applicant is required to provide a 20-foot fire lane on the south side of the building for emergency access. The applicant contends that the 20-foot landscape requirement would further limit the buildable area and make expansion of the existing facility economically infeasible on the site. The applicant is proposing a 5 foot wide landscape strp instead of the 20-foot width required by the code. This landscaping would provide for a transition from the finished development grade to the natural grade at the property line. Approval ofI the variance may be considered the minimum variance from the requirement that would be necessary to allow the applicant to expand the existing development on the property and accomplish their desired purpose. VARREPORT.doc BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT hober Expansion LUA-99-184,V-B JANUARY 26,2000 Page 4 of 4 D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested variance from Section 4-2-130.A. of the City of Renton Development Regulations.The variance would allow a 5-foot landscape strip along the site frontage of SW Grady Way, in lieu of the 20-foot wide landscape strip required by the development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the variance with no conditions. The applicant will require approval of a rezone, environmental review, site plan review and building permits, prior to commencing construction of the building expansion. Transmitted this 27th day of January, 2000 to the applicant and owner: Vectra, LLC do Mr. Dennis Schober 1400 Monster Road SW Renton, WA. 98055 Alan Poe Poe Engineering, Inc. 1314 8th St. NE, Suite 102 Auburn, WA. 98002 VARREPORT.doc • • • • LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T23N, R4E, W.M. RENTON, WASHINGTON t wfs• \\ \ ��•� ;YY• e 6 '11 1'e G• �wY \\ SITE 'is ipi� w�y • • tS- 4 py.. \ \\ \." %�.::'•. r7r'�iPw• tom',.re P �''.� � {� � • lilt `r.�, \�\ .. ...;ate•. • © .�q. • • �'/ R \\ �s� a\ 40 a �. r,,., sou xER ER k\' �sr �Pc ♦a'a.s 1' 0 1 ° °`�e'f i • • qq //V '/.�32° `t\ J Y�\\ \• e' 0. .. 4 e,....n.'/<a--070 ` 1, CR °r.\� \ \\°9p \, 1. n ,„ •je.,.nf aB .1„P. "((✓O / 9.P.p �„-y" •a .+ �^q °`<< ,\ s \ \.... t E,.. ��" a VICINITY MAP Pf` •'C7�/1/ �T\ ° \��♦^•.° \\�• \\ [=e=,,,•T.,.ft C `^/-•Jd�msu"s �r�'�I:�•y -_„rt_�'�3 I`.NpO(t) • \ rt /•` �o�\ \\.•• \\ "ems t ,.n W'a,,a7�5�;. `. Ced F:.iN%'� ,i I F. ir ��� _� JZ\ • \ L — i•i p.s.P.B ue. r �Fq,�,,,s • _ rfs— `°xsyV ":'r�•p'I , \ > _ \ -\ R. ..�rp.n7 • 4 .r )•ee • 4BaP0 f,,)1Ri'ii N \'-�'•n5-s ^.� 6 'YT )\ \ *,° MET R-v \+ a"u<r A�� cY6 igi,- 05P \s.t4 ^ \\ T4 I 1 ),\ , v.c.•ocr.'-. /' % p' �'P .rs T,o-��,r 1` °"'• a a•.•-../ f�\ T 7 E� p q +�f ' v'� \: i 31 v°�° 1' I / 78 • Acf<a. :'i01d t° 1 J,.a) `E • 's _• r. \ ,T 3° . f 'aa I I �i q '� 'O K 1 1• F 13 r' 'R .'r \ ,..,, , l` e'93 x (''.1' egA1 e`.r•:i'r /�tt '�\`\\2\l,. ki,,'+ .s 35gAt J j "•;�; \•, >"�' ` '<,•x .e$"•. :.. ® tN F j i •+a.• + 'n` 'gin/fn +S� \ \ r \!: ,, ' T \¢ .•a,S�N-' °u•,'e. mq,r rq. a� ''�r, °P lel 3\ R \ \ ,• 1 2 \ o er,' a ;•,,.. `7 e / • ,r.e- n01,0 r• „010 ,,g.r) Pc t a.01 \a R\\E \ � //,,..• il`+� "�� r`r�°/, \, \ rd" � - I P" ''� 405 ur,v:6,Ar��o` • F'° \ ' Oe nf°,`. I / \ �D^A° ' -T/ r!J' ,r.`` .•e'•°` tl' ,,.'' S.it.P°x�TO ct.,.•.uA \\ c,e,- ,."`' j:yes. \ 0 w \ \`ip /.•,o, , r° ...' f ''xT.* .,:. ..w•� / ♦,. ' ,�,,1+ �: " f //I Rf.1•.06 A:bA./.lnn^/M 6 ,,e =,.. �A-° \_\.\ / /_ / 7;4, H.+"' • /,: • ;�oe r d1�/ '��,. ,K\ri LR 1 Mf <,.w ,y„rxr ' NP�RR 1 1O° \Q - ' ' / r "'� ' + t'Y/jC ._.1/11>� c...zs e, <•' • ' \ ° ,.,,�����epN l(,°� 1 ..'�/`Y! r • ai 4^ ,•;'• .,e / <sl'\/ ,., ' , ;i.•�r.`rV' ««+ / J J 354'0°\ \/ sv,)/ 31 /--- `� /�� L; ile i�fir'eV,°.,./..+ ��� JF��[',1/I''r r°,,,./Lle' ''.`.; '��fO { N — �___ -C-- �� / [J V/' \— _— • —a—,—PwWtLo ,_—._I a X�J•�A/I /y•!f.'f,�<"r� �0-8� + •t;` 1 d 0 I N —1 $ p^" NJ 1:111--or''' 'pe6 A,,ed' °s'. Po, 1 2 \ /' 9-e_yr,.1'• ,r.r• Z..p„v`••i l �® dQ p �`© 0 — -- rr. . ter' ` \ le":: ' ��' o✓Up ,:�..�. !' y�\' .: a =f < , —' ,. r • •/ • I ''''' ••9,e•4PaefrR 'S.W. `16TN ST u...,,../ •-‘\tt V:5 ` ., �,t., I� • '•e I tf,.fe is • • ,„ PIA:, c:.,, _ scHoBE� AiRc�Fr =KrrERioRs is i. J r a ;r / � � t- tf • OADS.W. ,3P0 8T.° 'c+•"'"'/� /ur.r,",, a-- o r'•,•... E °" ©!1. '.9 hCNTo hi. , I�rA •_T a•„ dyi.04 t ..,u-O NO• T.Zi' p ^.i� ' JOB nTIE '\* tN` ,v� s```rE�"�e.s•"; �,,� B �� \ _ SCHOBER, INC. EXPANSION VARIANCE �'• ��� G��i�StO + ,rd°0' 38.60 \! 3 I .-�� L 1400 MONSTER ROAD ,.•.,-_ --__, . .�- 1 pp,\M"."s,a °,a°r� e`° nc a d /) \ RENTON,WA .Ir aey"°y:•°,o, '"�` n (h I �aeN. `J • `,x r pNOE L k SIHUnCN�®ENCMEE�1`0 Inc. .•' 1 - §y` P'V o,J"• f. I 't ICONJULTPiC fi'�,�: \✓ i • ., •.,,,,','.'p. q. • ///+++��� /00 NEST CONE 31PEET,9NR JIO -Tr'., ><\ \. • ..417. VA I / � * E 1(ENi,W9-5121ON 980J7 I _ 97, ` n v , {t06)859-J171/FAX(10G)859-St07 n,/,•-✓ • • • a 1wC • li / 1tJy,cu,�, CITY OF RENTON ! i Sy x !,I !ce//„d + D�ARtF�N7 OF PUBLIC TORS (Grn.22 . I EMS I NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP "�k _ el 1 I4°1, RATE:UAR01 1997 FIE x¢y6=ate _:ti . 1 =100 • E Eo. ` 9GE: ,eloo mneaa_vm / DE9OFPnON AR REV.GATE APPR0IED: 9QL�6: 1d °x[tr01 IA Re1C.3.g3 • EA.MA UI DECH--_1 LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T23N, R4E, W.M. • UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: 9,r+)1_•6` LEGEND t 2 CAUTION: PROPOSED STORY WATER DISCHARGE -�� l RENTON, [W NGD Q, = 'RR • RENTON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE PER VERIFYING THE L0CAT10N,DYENSION,AND DEPTH TO 010H ON THE WEST ODE OF Rt., /, AD5 W I.0: Ex,w DID •} / A=0514'57 OF ALL DOMING UTILITIES WHETHER SHORN W THESE PUNS OR NOT BY PoMWINC THE UTILITIES LONGACRES PARNMAY A157 NORM Z• / IB'RG' R.905 J7' MUM A A R x Ex.69 LF IB'0 - AND SLWVEYWG rHE N 09.040 AL AND VERTICAL 0 LOGDON PRHxi 70 LONSiNK00l. OF THE INTERSECTION W-SW.JAIXSON i } RfF a I]IS , Cl.I 1: L=8821' AC Pat I I ' WI • HMS SHALL INCLUDE CALIAIG U1X11T LOCATE 0 I-800-424-5555 AND THEN POMCUNR ALL 6 �` i . EN_R F04 FI:_2.3,1 4,` 'S'„ CO \ CAWo .711E 0(4 04 UTILITIES AT LGCADONS NEW U7LIIY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY rb,-lily N I I=ION 7.1 - A'04 •--n Inf.E WK,OL,w I I ' �� NETHER OR NOT CONRICTS EMT. LOUTIONS OF SAD UIUDES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS „pN,u,:I I, I•,,; • R A.r,lA11 ARF NOT WARANWTn AND ARF SIRdCT TO VARAIDN O OINrucis 411(xR0 MOW,IUD Iv 4•1 1,n It 1l :.•'•I' ' A 7....S P4 4ANYLVNG ��`a CONTRACTOR STALL CONSULT POE LNONEERNG,INC.f0 RESOLVE ALL PRIPIIUS POUR TO I••A1F1+ .�'.•. Rk(y4 y / I •I �`s as /�� PROFEEDWO MTH CONSTRUCTION, 1 Au1' t, J,a./ / , / PAArx .� B�•/•A • I•�• A 5'CONL ` I ! x bRIN CM , I �o��® • \ED.WALI(It•I+41L1 ll:':'i I'� AiJ1 PFIA1D4Wul / SWTHUNIER wIA'I V'Pivl 11-19.?. / H 1 • R\ • i �/ 'w . o� afS '> ONINS0EA/AECYO.E 36 1A 6,XIVI II.7140 • ;',- Dt •M1 I any�. po'z1o'SCREENED> 1-5 NFW TAPS FOR •'• / 14, .•Q 1'" VARIANCE SOUGHT 10 REDUCE REQUIRED HYDRANT k BUILDING 1'11 I F ;y`45 3 !�,0(,, I $' L/S FROM 20'TO A NOMINAL PLANTER . WATCR SUPPLY S� 1S Wti '!1' • `G .1r,11,1.,�1 s s •;�'��d a. . `� ✓,; NX's g, WIDTH AS SHOWN(5'AVERAGE MINIMUM) VICINITY MAP 1• III , `i •W^''-` v Ntl 'Ni TO TRANSITION GRADES AT ELEVATED I.2400(E) y' 1 '� �Ylr ,T. GRADY WAY 1 SO R./ -VP,:' O '1'. ,,. P SITE DATA: �1%; 05.5/W ,"�`.^'- G (2)3'/7' V o -..-.,2 SITE AREA 3 23 AG 140,625 SF • , �' ?s`Y'., f,. N ly STORY OFR6 N 5 D/'IB'OS'E . 1••Pk91L_:Eli .` 'V J '✓• l 11.69' ! ZONING w li`r-s nni,u,11.:A�- ;-{..;r� V Jo zso .q;:�5 V' aWPANCY B.SI,n • IP:r'8:Nd S CL-.'I.IT �•, 1Q�� .!/�O' �'; ".'.' 12669' )' `&� CONSTRUCTION IRED): . S45PRPlKIERED ••,1d S 6653'OB'E r S ,Aa►, (s 23ro6's2'w) -' PARCEL D) �. /.lo ,a LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: • FRONT 20'ARTERIAL IS'ODLFR A=01D6'll' � W7FW02 5,600 SF y� NONE' Ex.[DIG[U A'1,N1I- , 4(I'R��`/ ,'I'�r t'•:".:':I ,-i (2)9'/10 34 _ __ , R-I131 W' 4P ffRWETER 17,BW SF. DOCK-INCH .< __ L-21.83' 'y NATURAL(0 POND) 3,600 SF REAR NONE NOO'NARiEPoAL'IS'OTHER . RELOCATE EX SONS .�• S '•,`¢ ;•'.":_,I ;::,!:: 5 C SETBACKS.(PRONDED2 ASREOUINEO . co. '`•' Tc-_'006'UiU'Ef- 321'01`� - ---- PO NORM 60'(•)•PO.W. • _ _ _�, (LEASE SPACE 13,936 SF) • 1/7'r; �P r BUILDING HEIGHT: �� - � >r' El rfA;C 1)01 ` O SOUTH 25'1 RO.W. .. ` ' - :(PARCEL'0).. :-( 6• .r;;,_x %`1 Aa ro NEW EXPANSION' t -` 32,0'(-) EAST 60'((1)'r RAID • , /?`�� „ I I•POWER Qr BE REMOVED 3I,SN ff ffRWKIDiED S� ,'V�. WEST 60'(1�1 R.O.W. ®® •$, r� BuIDNG AREA: // `%r.. - a SW.TCH •:�;Pi: (. •0NP i0 �,F.F.DDO C/�K )f EEXISTING XPANSION • �16551 SF 4 SF/1,448 SF 2ND M ��8 6Y BE REMOVED.-��TEn.., SEIFINAER Al\T I RRE LANE .. /'/ - .V. •_:"ml-`'/ '-E.fide( ��CWG RA1P WSER 20' ALLOWABLE WRONG AREA:' •- ' ' .T• 'Y,y, ,lAfl h k IANDWC SEPARADW BASIC • HIUW{v UII,1' 'P 8,000 SF 4.yi4'• -, N• . , -_ •`. 11/T4' WALL 1e, SPRINKLER DECREASE 300X(1)STORY ',: ::. I F_10 U' \ %MAD(DECREASE IWX ,a•'' .1,(t 1,, >+ :•';y I: (PARCEL B) J • ALLOWABLE AREA 45000 SF(I)STORY S 69'FOT E , .�,•^• 1. "3' r I. EW 5 T%: 4" 37 ` STORY 0 64.000 SF 2 STORY 11.12 T -:' . . i�`.':�;:;.'7:q-,: :.I'-_ Wql( _ . , ,•:f _ OFR2S"X 2 • 6j, PERCENT-REWIRE4flLACE 29.86 j 1 p'' ��_''.fir . + -.'-••.-?','--.'•^ __ }ems '' '-T RAIR•G (SCHOBER INC. SPACE `, 2,682 ff%2 PARKING REWIRED: F0 SF/ Effigy Cx 11,-',/ I �' 4� 1 I` ;%,'4 E� -Cx.-:I `Li';A•.:sR• '" 17,618 SF) `V OFRCE 2.26(1 SF/J00 6.J00 S/300 RM51 �' .•' - CANT4 h i :;ro RESEADl /S /,500 17,436 ff/1,500 PI/, 1 ,� ::s a •'r .�L,.-I. f.. '�/ 1 u G iORACE 6,SOW SF II.000 1000 ff 1.000 LNNfH 4R(d 173J2' / 2. /¢.= }i ,d.- - ."�jri L* •'N�,; N 56'IB'25'E V iII� TOTAL61 SPACES ` (PARCEL A) , `:+/:,.ry;:r'; BaaRl i �I .Ds 6633'oe'wCXIB', "•+!' / , `I' .T "" H___ / PARKING PROWOED66 SPACES(4 H/C,10 COMPACT) ,' 11: _ +7.7: _L'" EXIST.PAYED MU I&2o0 ff Ex rH DETENnW •�. _ 1 EX. BUILDING YAra ( ��04`� '..%.''`:';'`D S 7"• • • I..•F._L.- FA TOTAL PAVING/WALKS 40,996 SF77 _I M.319 SF F,F.300 F.F. .Z`..:f..4�/, V.,_;I,;"'; R { ''• r POND/NATURAL ' ) � :•: 1 ,,,y. •• ''�5.," iOTAI IYPERW0115 101,079 ff'b LANDSCAPING 2i • (2151Cu' P'", •� 'i{',;k'4'_��F�'s J1 /� Ot _ 4 OF coE AREA o _,, 1 N• �__ [x.a10and .-•/j. ..\> �V;1. ✓.�,�_.'q.:�, • \9_ (� 1 orSITEA .:-LI '1k-LanTSOF 1 E.CITY 2 VP- :Y:�3 ;'.;;3:j;:; y'� r•:,;.1.1,.,, PARCEL NUMBERS: Ex WMH / ' 'I _ +•..ljF i;WO \\\\ i 2N0 FIRti Orc'RG B/1o•'~' r,` ;-L:J. R I.:n,. �:;:� 242304-9037,242304-9134 �l `b: S'(29.T50 PELOGTE=. ?�f' I'/�' ir' ANC.�YOYL AS +P.2582 ` '(., �� -� .:.-'-_+''^ "I -1i.' ; ,.S,''e(::"�. ,W=Ix NECESSARY DATUM: • P/PPCa 20 J2 �' ` ,� C::" ' -,,C;'Y I'' g1AgM�r' T0L EK POY•ER ., ii.Cti. 20'R t'J xt=_r___ �•4 FIt �l 7041 "R-7 2} ELEVATIONS REFER TO 0TY OF RENTON DARN(NAND 1988)AND ARE • WNH / .m`,9 _= �% r 1 v� yyL / •'l.�=-=�':.' `'•,'-- // BASED ON ELEVATION 1965,TOP oF MONOYENT W CASE AT THE P=26.01 - "C COIC .=% R C': _ O)ri •?;• rl� F ,*`" -%s , I "yZ )SLAB;-. ® flI 'F..• STREET• REREECTI0t OF OAKESOALE AVENUE SWD1WE57 AND S017HWEST 7M I Q=21.06 - , -'•. ..%Y I'-'' ;•y- ••- a'`A y� .. x! "'�' ' AND USW)AS BENCHMARK Na 1854 7 •'+}2 '! • �t 4''.'g' „A• ' _� [•[r BENCHMARK SET FOR 57E USE AS FOLLOWS EX 12' (I- - "-_ :' � "cT .•(DOTS ISM RAID. .+,a�(1 97TN1,,-..1],„„:„._,...,...._. o=od•Jo'I9' CONC A-88W9'46' A.2110'10' N I``\ Lam\ �J'* .h :.IIP rO�LX•51AW k' V )-� E7�T:�•[''•l'L. ,'' R.2J0B00' BENCHMARI(Na I: R.15' R-352.11' Ex SSN I - / F7 62' a K- TQ- yy }.a(:F0XOO C(910, .' L=I81.82' TOP CF 0CAETO WARE IN S01OWE51 CORNER OF TRAT]TC SIGNAL ;-.1" L.2126' L•130.10' m=26.01 A6" •�,., (.;T.. '�'M�'f' �E�. s 'D`i U01T CTCRETE PAD ABUTDNG LIGHT POLE PAD ON NEST SCE OF 1E-39.51 Ex EP `` `.., C qT:�`:.r;V^.'y+' i.9�., ( ' c-C. RELOCATED MONSTER ROAD,175 FEET NORM OF THE INTERSECTION MM • ' :iI ' ( SQBGED),-;I j '�Q TIS ARCA S)BdET TO, `M. ``u' • „ .'i.•D•it C_--1)•:.:.-.r,. ''���i► S THE FRONTAGE ROAD.ON ME NORM SIDE OF HIGHWAY 405,ELEV.25,02 Ex B'PC EAYNENT GRANTED TO PUGET SOUND Ex 12'W O4AS:T .$ .__• `;_ �'__-.s(7(!�`•.%OK..- - \6�� POfIEF h LIME CONPANT,FILED fR `. 15 R' '1 =,i1.1i7, UNDER RECORDING NUNBER 5861254 RO 'n D7w: _ ��' [x UP h :Q .,r C,!x, S �s 3417637'E - WY AKHOR 0 Sir ``\` �'d64�' r��-_p.-R, 4y�<•: 703' SCHOBER, INC. EXPANSION 7YP.-� ' ' I400 MONSTER ROAD S.W. _ o 51 UTILITY rnE• 'I}I 'NE'W, AIN 4'Er ORCG RENTON,WA Ex SSNH I `�_ J ' Com NORTH ERE RIM=27 46 - • WW�,, POE Engineering, Inc. Pt 0V9-k STRUCTURAL FNONFE la:NSUU4 ,.'r,:,: D=ma A=595E00. ` 7Og OWNER INFORMATION: "' IJ14 BW SVeel N.E SUE 102 Cx fi PVC R=175.99' ```°`.`` EXISTING BURDWG IS REWIRED VECTRA,LLC AUBURN,WASMNCTON 98002 L=183.81' 4I TO BE SPRINXLERED AS PART ATM MR.DENNIS SCNWER sz (253)833-4052/FAX(253)633-4053 Cf THE EXPANSION CONSTROCDON 1400 MONSTER ROAD SW. PCsix7ILCL°, CITY OF RENTON EX UTILITY POLE- RENTED,WA 98055 Q.2) {}4 PH(425)255-4000 DEPARTMENT O/PUBLIC MO® __ FAx(425)277-1871 I 3� I .- - - VARIANCE SITE, L/S & UTILITY PLAN VARIANCE SITE, L/S& UTILITY PLAN 1•.}0• (PLAN NORM) PLAN,...,: ARP. DATE: DEC 1999•FIE N0 99-037 DRAWN: 6 MO 4i00RU ARP. SCALE: I•.30' MD 102.___P a:_ DESCRIPDON BY RED.DAZE ...,SEED DOCTOR O MUC XrxW, 94IT�W. I 1 • O O O (l).SI'-e.D5•-0. O 8 0 P00! O O • l(� Ca.) RA9fxC RR RE..RR 0 • - EILVAILO •.(61AOSSCAf[RR. LAW IA) QQR 0 (0/0,a) COAY•A ROPOYD - • 6 I-R b LLI, b. ] ti mA ROWPL 0[ bib 1 ) �") L—/ :1 I I IMEI "eJ b P.I.ur.wA RSAADW. •Jy ' Ban r T 7 •Irnr'--� (CRW D farm D ICRW A MJJ1-- RLfSY➢® RA55 PM SS I. G W~ W RRPERO FUSS ...... j z U EAST ELEVATION • O FLASHING DETAIL W SV (--i-7) 0 BT-31-: O Of 0 IIe-VO 0 a �m = IE...(n-ol ROR•ri RI \was. L.KKR•/ RI . M9ar0 RR Rif@ tlxOSR `I _ 1]e-il MOW ((.(R'-D) M ROB 1/A} •AE AXES ] !'Isl IAIOYAR OD A. MT.Bu[Dxt� J (CO.]) r____ _r-___- -f♦ - _.__�_ —ly(A) / ISORM PMTOYDGRADY law 'I■I■'■I� Oa YMD — ..,• ___\_ • 1 POWOa Z • •�R[SA�D DDOI-�W - I i ,____ , . , 'fa LAX • 0 b* i l J ® REVEAL DETAIL �p �bI RHAs RR RECESSED AOIRAAI• 1S C t 9'n0 9'n0, DE.l/A} GLASS ORIQ 11.1.I. -5 m o �CRW0 UM.CRASS W c o0.-wx O OS (CRW}) ICRW 21 —1 WEST ELEVATION N }Si_(.-0. 8 AfiROWIAR ]Y6 OWE•}R'. UP n Ic CI D A /�Nj�s� 11Y • 195'-6xf amy O 61'-3ri' O R-II DR.. 0 usERR50E R D I tU•/o f[s9 f{A9A4 [(IM ROQ e f(. RRi-LP / ROW RY•OW KRIS••f-0.0/C. ` • IcRW 0 .(]e-]1\ FROOMG } ln' Snfu AN m !/ —1W.) -y (h([AM MD to R-}I Z - I, gg{grp�9•-O Af r } _y CUM H I(CRW}I 0136 U[AO On W N. R " RYAS PER OOW LSPOUI. [CAInE l.r.l OFIAR}/A} Mk . CC RW]) �W A) SOFFIT DETAIL o I r°oa" 1- ,� L=1 / • X L .U� L.../ rA ,' ';; NORTH ELEVATION • A OCOOS SLAB PER RAY O O O 2I6'6' O O II SOEIRS.RE1 457N f }6 A' / I@-D' / I M9.PER ROR•rr rBWI-W :I-W OfgXR • } ._ DU.I�3 /•1]L'_}1 /[KCMG Al PAIELS .. it lc f SLAB E S TO EIA Or ROF r�����J999 Z! ._.____-I r_ --__— .. c _____.r f ' OK ELL W sna.K1 Ill prim l/1/}Dm� -- Crown Iu WI(C.Y Imo,.AS HC[SSARY) ' la`\ OFFICE FRONT DETAIL DATE . / • ,. t b O xis - WA.r BY DEC 1999 IS ,-�DOe15PWi. L le GY0 MCA R 5U15 RR (CROP}) _ _ _ K.} 4 [(SOx Br (CRW S)]) — - ALP. ` By 99-037 . (�WRP2) WAOR 2}IIGI RY OAR O[SO®OW %V NO SOUTH ELEVATION .. �._._o. A2 `: ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATIONCITY OF RENTON • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT-' NOTICE OF PUBLIC°HEARING Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states thathe/sfieisth e'_LegalClerk:of the 1. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at_its.regular '` �`'` meeting in the Council Chambers, on the ! - '! SOUTH COUNTY UTj�N���L - s t :£`` i V COVIVTY JOURNAL: ;,. 7th floor of City Hall, 1055 So.Grady :n. :i' =i;r.` "? ;_ -'' ;�, z Renton,Washington,on January 26,2000 � I, _ - 600.'S. :Washington Avenue, Kent, Washii ortr 98032 " ` - at 7:30 PM to consider the following var- , i:. _;; r lance proposals: ' °`"it;i; SCHOBER ANDSCAPE VARIANCE a daily pewspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said;_newspapei.is,a,;lagal <r; .i r • newspaper of general publication and is now and has been formore>>than six onths;. .oe En ineeri g requests variance to , ' ` reduce frontage.landscap- priorto.itl ed,ate,of publication, referred to, printed and'publisheed in`the`Englishf.language red Gene required Grady Way from a dsfoot continually,as:a'idaily newspaper in Kent, King County„Washington:-The South:;County ' width to a 5-foot width. Location: 1400 Journalfas';been approved as a legal newspaper order:of the;Su erior,Court.pof.the.,,.;., Monster Road SW. ' '`" ` PP g by p' = , AVALON RIDGE SIGN VARIANCE State of;Washington for King County. -LUA-99-190,V ' "The notice in the exact form attached, was published:in the°Sbuth'Coui ty ' -Variance from required 10-foot setback for ( Journal!. and not in'supplemental form) regularly which was distributed to the subscribers (, monument sign approx. 4-feet, 7 inches ` from the site's north property line.Location: during the.below stated period. The annexed notice, a - . - ' 510 Stevens Ave.SW. ;;= _ ' - . -•• -i-i.i:,--1-i : .{.• Legal descriptions of the files noted Schober'Landscape Variance • above are on file in the Development ' Services Division, sixt tf floor, Henton City ;_;pi,, ; :::;, f_. •,:r n `; T-,_ ;. Hall.All interested persons to said petitions as published on: 1/14/00 are invited to be present at the Public . - .. Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: January 14,2000 The full amount,of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the.sum of$43.13, -Published in-the South.eounty,Journal charged:to'Acct. No. 8051067. -January 14_2000.77086 Legal Number 7086 Legal Clerk, S o n ournal•:; a_. Subscribed and sworn before me on this / day of , 2000 vk,._ .. 4. ., o0 ••,,,,,,,... ..„. _ , ,:.TRY m day. . : o_ a Notary Public of the State of Washington ':., Prf�L;� , • i residing in Renton ,' •A. o.• �o King County, Washington .. . . . : no••' o � 'Ili°A°ereasassio►a°0°°�° , CITY OF RENTON r--, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular meeting in the Council Chambers, on the 7th floor of City Hall, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January 26, 2000 at 7:30 PM to consider the following variance proposals: SCHOBER LANDSCAPE VARIAN I E LUA-99-184,V Poe Engineering requests variance to reduce required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. Location: 1400 Monster Road SW. AVALON RIDGE SIGN VARIANCE LUA-99-190,V Avalon Bay Communities requests a variance from required 10-foot setback for monument sign approx. 4-feet, 7 inches from the site's north property line. Location: 510 Stevens Ave. SW. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, sixth floor, /� Renton City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: January 14,2000 j# ne(io Account No. 51067 V SeAt e— Ma rib P/14 boapublicalion City of Renton Departure t of Planning/Building/Public Works __ ENVIRONMENTA & 47E-1'EL` OP ENT AFt—PC CA--TY-ON REVIEW SHEET oak REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fit ��/&oleo COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION o. u'..`_°� 4,U 811111 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant,.Poe Engineeripg, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Jae?) not Q B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • Signature of DirectoroOrAuthorized Representative Date . routing Rev.10/93 t � City of kenron Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:rdonom)I Dv`e/opi COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. ; PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft.(3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5i-re IS I'JCS c.rv!I I ay, L so Lv`CM[sWi' Aza- - 1r 71.17-7- c %-✓ t1L6(-{DVS\Ve' rt- ,iWO 2-0- 1 0 P-I . S 11-1-c 5 us C. P't.L.erU t Q 1+6- P ( Zo c j 2 V �ot-t c--r 1 55ut-S - `c s Zci7. tL 3.7 t_✓-i-rvrvI rvL C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this prol. 1 t Lr% / ¶osa AlLi// G ) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat routing Rev.10/93 ti. City of Renton Department f Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: vales COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance , WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way slight-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance w,as previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals - Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • -Rood sra az/72(27,51-na? 0/a,igo C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w re additional informati 's needed to properly assess this proposal. ///3/ ignature of Director or Au orized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 t Mecla City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOP ENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT�)')f0,6-f A wGS COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from al 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS NO Ate C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /hA1c5 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas ditional information is needed top perly assess this proposal. Sig re of Director or thorized Representative Date f J routing Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL`'' & DEVELOPIIIENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: / cpyrld'o) COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 6+f y�� I APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe EngineeritLi ,requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial OM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Wayl right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants. Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Me COW Alta We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propbsal. }0e�11Na 174Aff Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • routing Rev.10/93 tj* ,t •• 0 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPIrENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENZity6tie orcirr DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400'Monster Road SW • SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft.(3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial OM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way,right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS )JO GOstNt4cI • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 44rk Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 111, ‘,4„1 t i City of Renton Department f Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fi2V441t COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 28, 1999 APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,777 sq.ft.existing;35,736 sq.ft. proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering, requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way Fight-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. i A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS IL o Lv 1441444 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. t hiatO I ?/2-q/q Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing F Rev.10/93 City of Rv...:,n Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPM NT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: d flueyei# COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 11, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-184,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 2$7-,99S J9,-.1% �i r3r 'r n� s B!e tl B V 1 d U� e. tl.J E 1 P APPLICANT: Poe Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen FIPF nPF11FNITIf1N BUREAU PROJECT TITLE: Schober Variance WORK ORDER NO: 78622 DEC 2 2 ld3C, LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 140,625 sq.ft. (3.23 acres) V BUILDING AREA�9ross : 11,777 s ft istih 33sI' proposed;47,513 sq.ft.total SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Poe Engineering,requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site is located within the Medium Industrial (IM)Zone which requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever, is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx. 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site. This variance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services _ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet //�� / 4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /04 We have reviewed this applica 'o with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional inform t is needed to properly assess this proposal. � -d Signat - .f Director or Authorized R resentative Date routing Rev.10/93 EV L « «<:::>:::>:>::: ....E OPMENT<` .. . ...:. ,..� ` : : ..: . .:, :::;::::::;<;:;:::::::::::::::;::::::::;::::;;:;::::::;:::;:::::;:;:..::..:::.::...: . ...:.:.:::.SER•V•ICES 7IVISION. :::::::.:. ... ..... IiilliIST OF SURROUNDINGPROPERTY OWNERS.....::..:.:: feet:of.: e<s .......... ........................................................... th ub ect:PROJECT NAME: SCHOBER, INC. EXPANSION APPLICATION NO: LUA- qi I04 , V' The following is a list of property owners•within 309 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER KC• P,ARK•S„ &,; REC. DEPT. 2040 84TH AVE SE 242304-9010-00 c/o WILSON JOE PROPERTY MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 MGT. BURL,INGTONNORTHERN TAX DEPT. 242304=9028-00 SANTA FE • 1700 E GOLF RD. #400 SCHAUMBURGIL 60173 T.UKWILA;;CITy.) OF 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. 24230A-9034-02 # 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 MANUFACTURERS,! MINERAL CO 1215 MONSTER RD SW 242304-9075-02 RENTON, WA 98055 • M_ ANUFACTURERS, MINERAL CO 1215 MONSTER RD. SW 242304-9100-01 . RENTON, WA 98055 K.3NG,.COUNTY o, 506 2ND AVE #708 242304-91 1 7-02 • DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES M/S 7ST SEATTLE, IWi 98104 1400 MONSTER RD. ' SW 242304-9134-01 RENTON, WA 98055 BURL_INGTON;' NORTHERN TAX DEPT. 242304-9027-01 SANTA FE y; 1700 E GOLF RD. #400 • SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 O, W ,R=1 R,;&,: NAV; CO PO BOX 2500 242304-9029-09 %UNION PACIFIC RR CORP BROOMFIELD, : co 80'020 r_ RU.IV`SH., FAMILY,,,,FUN CENTER 33208 PASEO CERVEZA #C 242304-9063-06 • . J SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA, 92675 DI VELOPMENT PLf;(;i JWG .CITY OF RENTON (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) . • R' E ED (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 PROPERTY TAX DEPT BELLEVUE, WA 98009 242304-9086-09 MANUFACTURERS MINERAL CO 1215 MONSTER RD SW RENTON WA 98055 242304-9106-05 KC PARKS & REC. DEPT. 2040 84th AVE SE c/o WILSON JOE PROPERTY MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 242304-9127-00 MGT. Applicant Certification I, , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: •0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records King County Assessors Records Signed A' • ,Date IZ 1S �eA (Applicant) . NOTARY ATTESTED: bscribed and sworn before me, a Notary P Iblic, in an ;�o^^r the State of Washington residing at • �J on the )5 — day of �J , 19 '7 9_. Signed C7h• • (Notary P lic) CIt :.of... e o .:U :>•:>:::. :: ;.. .. : .....: s. • • 1 ;. WA$HINOrr .. :.::.::.. Signed. ,��fc.•. ..... .. .... ...........................:::.:.::.....:.Date,,............. ............. .. ::i:: :<'is:`;iii:iiiii:`i�:;::i2ii:isiii:>i: i:i:i::.;:;:ii:i:ia:i:�:i�;�i;���i:;ii:<.;i:>;:i::i:;;isi:i:ia si2ii>i<iii::i�iii:iii:iiiiiiii isisiiisi:::: N TAR • <;,.> <>::da"'of'>; :,:,.':' ;:`> >«:<>::>< <: ..: .. • ;.;;::;.;:<.;::;::.;: listprop.doc REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29•!Ki 2 1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted With the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-184,V-B/SCHOBER VARIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Poe Engineering,requests approval of a variance to reduce the required street frontage landscaping along SW Grady Way from a 20-foot width to a 5-foot width. The subject site Is located within the Medium Industrial OM)Zone which'requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet,whichever,is less. The SW Grady Way right-of-way adjacent to the site is elevated approx.20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade of the site.This vadance was previously approved in 1997 but the variance expired prior to site construction.The site is bounded by public streets on all sides(SW Jackson St.,Longacres Parkway SW 16' St., Monster Road SW,elevated SW Grady Way). The applicant is providing the required landscaping along all street frontages except for the requested landscape variance along SW Grady Way.The applicant plans to expand the existing manufacturing facility on the site.The existing building is 11.777 sq.ft.and the applicant plans a 31,554 sq.ft.addition to the south and east of the existing building. The applicant would add additional parking/maneuvering areas,landscaping and stonnwater detention for the addition. The building expansion is not subject to land use permits and only building permits would be required. • PROJECT LOCATION: 1400 Monster Road SW I PUBLIC APPROVALS: Variance—Board of Adjustments Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 14,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen a1430.7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The date of Wednesday,January 26,2000,at 7:30 PM,has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held In the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: December 21,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 29,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 29,1999 s; N;;.*--,*.?;--,,_ 4.. \,,,,,,) \. Vic:'--,47 O IC<}j' - �_---..$-' - �" -yx— ' f DEWS /�IGMVT IMrZAle0.] ii-` •^' r/�c1•) •` l / c„\ -'lot. Ti cif`, / I, 'y, V I _, CERTIFICATION I, Pek ( R QJ\, , hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in S conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . �-o wAa 3,109 . Signed: g...„7_,„ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a No Public,in and for a State of Washington residing , on the "0 " day of Wt.-1-N . 240 O O • • "--) 2/r"CG--rv-1 CAA—Ole LMARILYN KAMCHEFF MARILYNIwMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 a STATE ISO IONWA EXPIRES COMMISSION EXPIRES k> JUKE 29r 2003 > • CITY. .JF RENTON . ..iL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 29, 1999 Mr.Alan Poe Poe Engineering, Inc. 1314—8th Street NE, Suite 102 Auburn, WA 98002 • SUBJECT: Schober Variance Project No. LUA-99-184,V-B Dear Mr. Poe: The Development.Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is.complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application: . The date of Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. • . Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Vectra, LLC/Owners • 1055 South Grady Nifay=Renton Washington 98055 ` . •:�.{ ;»::i:''�:::t:5 :,:.>:i�:t:�i>:5;; �:::%�::;;<::'�i:::: :::`n:.:•:,��;':"`:::::::f::::::::::::::''�;y`; :::2:':::::5::':::: ::::::<: ::::s :':'?:::: :':!::: ..............................:.:::::.�::::::::::::.�:::::............................................:...:�:::::::.�.�......................................:.::...yin.�.�. .�.......:::::::::.................................�:.�::.:_:::......................... 11 :.::.::::.::.:::;.:;.:;:.:::,:.>:a.:..;:.;:.:.:.:uc::;::::.:::::jj:::::;i::;::'::::•::•:�:.:::?:::;::::;:::::::;:y:::;:;::::i:::::::::::::::;'<:::i::>::i:;:::::::::::::::: :: :t;::::: `ri:;::?:::::::::2;;:: ::::;::::::;::::::::: ::2%:':�::r::::::::::: ::is�':?2::::�S::r::::::::::::::ii::�:::::::::;::'.,...:::......:1:.•': .:::.:.':::'..:::::.:.�' ::i::::: :ii:�::::::?::: , OP ERI .PERT otet% 0here::is:::rnor than one Iecar cwnery;please attach::au additional::: . notarized;Master.ApRlcat�onfac.eacr:owner_...;, PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: VE-,,C.,TQ-A , l.l_C� G{rlc c cL,( I�G• C�/�CPA�SLi�7 \S SC.-b>a l/Azs G�sf PROPERT R Y OJECT A DDDD RESS(S/LOCATION: ADDRESS: l4c=o t'L�•-�S Cz- V �o�+.P ti4oc. Q_oA;;;,. S.W, CITY CL-�.e�To� ZIP: o�$�r�S KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 24-Z. 1C:Par — `1,031 TELEPHONE NUMBER: dr",S. - Z,SS • 4, EXISTING LAND USE(S): 1-�.+d.�-�V c� ft✓�rA T �'o T V A� V G U....a4NT.;f�f ether�han�wner�}.:::::::::::::�::: .. +�. PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: .. �FF'l c G ��A 1t-vV.�x�S J S-re,CL G.X.' . COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: VA•--L`1 ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): �rA CITY: ZIP: ' EXISTING ZONING: J�vYt 7 <=k.:320z=c51.) TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .: A SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: �PPLI GF��--�T� �C row,S S� 3 �+Z✓ A< ., • COMPANY (if applicable): • PROJECT VALUE: SST., l ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: -,�,pGc IIIIMINNIMiiiiiPIEEGAtStitS01, _,jitifitatiiFOOPERTY1AffithliWOOL.._;J.OiiiWtii0CWii0604SarVISiiiiiMiiiiiiijii.iiii.iiiiiiiiiiMiiiiiiiiiiiin .. . (Ar-c-0...c.,..,...fs.t:: • . . :1--t-t- 4_c-i-e-. •L-AJ-)t)Sc.,,,,b,e ...,c,., a 44,-r -vs.t.... 5-re-6-61- ** -r.ca¢L...E. 4.- -7.-- \lo A.. • . . .. -• L;.i.ammeite.tammigiamangionntammatvpt.ii.i.tiir.ilitigitiditittoispige„fttcseggignmengiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing..iiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiimesimeRsiii is:iiiiiii::iiiiiiiiii::::i.:i:i:ii:ii...::iiiiiin:i:iiii:iii.:.::::::m:;:m•::•::::.:mii::iiiimi:ii:::::.::.5.iiimiiii:iiKii:iiiiiignimiNii.:D.::ii.e0VM:::•V: i:*iiiiniiiii!imEN,:vm ::::0:::::: :::::.gi:,:mg:iiimigimmisimegm thitOIC.40tig0011:tatipmtypecttiatiapp*6001xyAtaftwijkttelarsOlowlefmosimusiiimmipm . . . .._.. . . .. . ... . —ANNEXATION . '. SUBDIVISION:..„. .• • — COMP. PLAN-AMENDMENT - $ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADVSTM ENT__ — — SPECIAL PERMIT • .• __ TEMPORARY PERMIT SHORT PLAT $ _ $ — TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' $ PRELIMINARY PLAT _ — $ . , ... SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT - •.-, • • • - • $ _ _ _ GRADE.&FILL PERMIT.... •-, ...•. .$ . ••• ' '-,'- . (NO. CU. YDS: „ . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ )4 _ ... . ,...,VARIANCE • 8 .. . (FROM SECTION: 94 ) PRELIMINARY . _ _ WAIVER - . _ WETLAND PERMIT . - . $ . :. — , ,• ..• - . • ROUTINE VEGETATION . — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ - ' BINDING SITE PLAN $ . . ..,. ,..• .. . " • —SHORELINE'REVIEWS:.• . ' - ,.. -•-• ' S.. • '- :' ' ;• '-' . . _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE. $ ,. _ ---- • - . •••• 5 '— VARIANCE $ , . _ ' EXEMPTION $No CKaroe ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ —-- — REVISION $ ....". . .. ........................................................................................................................................................................................--....—„..............................................................................................................,...,....,...,......... I, (Print Name) A.......A....--, . Pes..... , declar.e that I am (please check one) the owner of the property involved in this.applicatior;Nr,the' authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of a—u—thorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . . . , ••• .. A • - 6 . . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,.$,Notary Public,in and ,-,.,L.&...--4. ---... .FE.... .. to he State of/0/4 residing'at. • ' • (Name of Owner/Represg) ,on the 41 day of l, - . . . . (Signature of Owner/Representative) . - ' ' ' 6t4_41-e-g). , (Signature of Notary P blic) ]]...]•::::i.,:]•::ii:]]•:•?...:ii*i....::•.i:i:i*.f.i*::i:::i:;•:::::ii,i,i,i,i,i,iimm..::::::::.,iii,.,•::*?.:.:i:i*,...i..::i*iii..ii:iiig:iii:fe.•::i..i:i:::::iti*.iiiiiiiiiii:iiiimi:ii:igiii:.:iii:f:g:::i:i:i,i:ii:.:ni..ii:Fiii::::iiiiiiiii:iiii:.iii:ii:i:iii:.iii.:i.:i:iinigiiimiiiiiiii:iiii:iiiiiaiiiiii:.::iiii:iiiiiiiiiiii:::iiiii::iiii::iii:iiiiiiiii:.iiiiiiiiiiii:i::ii:::ii.::ii::.i:iiiiiiii?:iniiiiiminimi.:iiiiiiiiiig:iiff:ii]imi?: :,iii:•::i: ::.i:•:.,...ii.iii$ii::iiiiiii]...i...::...ii!::ii::.:::?..:iiiiiiiiiii:iii:iiiiiimii§i:i.::iiiiiT:iii:i]iiiii::•,:i:mi:i,..!iiii:.iiiiiniiiiiiiii:iii]im]i:i:i]iiii:iiiiii•.:::::ii::iiiiiiiiiiiiiii:i:i:::.iiiii:.:i:i:ii::iiiii:imiiiiiiiiiii:in::ii:i:i:ii:ii:i:ii-c:i•:::iii:iiif:iimi.c.ii::::,:f:*.:::.:i:iii:iff:i:i:i:i:i:ifsii:i*.f.x:i*:i:ii:::*i*Km::i:i:::i:iii::*•;:i...::•:frix*i:i:i:•::•::i:i:::•:ii..i:i:i:::?..::::if::::•:•.•::K:i..i:i:i*i:i*::::•;:i,..,*.•:ii*i..::•:::i, . mtfgciiai6K:jiegftitBeifoiaaitEiv.oioisfaftmiiiiiiggs:egmiiimig;:gimmimiga!iiiiiiiiiioinimii':ii ERViiiiiiii4iiiitailtial:::.:Itrifiliii!eiiiiielAffiiaiiiiiiiiiii§fildiigt. ilidiiigintgeiiiiittiaigidtgaiiii.8g6P.iiiiila_liniliiiiiiiiiiiiiIiii ,:.,i,i,i,i,i.,:.?..i...:.,i,i,:•::.,i,i.:iii,:.,,.::::...,4...-.:,i:::::::.:.......,,,,,,,,,,,i,..:::*::::•,ii:.••• '' ..... .•...".. .. .:::::,,,,,,,,:iNi...:.::.i.,,•:.K..:::::•,,,,,,,,::::::,,,,,:::::::::::::::::•,,,.:::::::::::::::::::,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,::::::::::.:.:,,,,,,,,::::::::::,..,.:• ::.i:gig.:::,,,,,,*::,i:.:.:...::.:::•::::::•::.::::,,,iw:isi,im MiltitotettamfZONEIRR:::..:1.V.ORONAE$Amm::',SliftiAMS.1411.110106R.OSIVIE§IMENITRF,w.44.q;,:ii::m1p. vaiNvoR seemenspiiiltimuttEgpinWiiiiiiiiiiiiiitifeRAiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitotAetttlfMCOttdVid. tiliNfillidaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiEniiingiii&igiiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!i! • .i.,,,:::::::::::::::::::,,,,,,,,,::::;,;:mommgmmoiii,:inimgmeinimmimpiim:::,;,;r:::::,:,.::::::,:,,,,,;,:,,,,,,;!;!:,;],],:::•::i.ggagEminiiiiii:iiillimmo MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 . . • ..� - • • • EXBIBIT "A-try PARCEL Ai • That portion of Government Lot 6 its Section 34 Township 23 North Range 4 EaSt, W.N.,. in }King County, Washington, described as follows • seginning-at a point of intersection of the south line of said Government Lot 4 with the' easterly lane ,of County Road No, 8, said •point being 700' feet, 3nore or less, west of the southeast corner of said subdivisions. , thence northerly along said road line to the westerly line cf the Northern Pacific Railway Fottpa y'e. spur right-of-way; thence southeasterly aloes said right-of-way line to the south line of said subdivision; • thence west to the point of beginning; 5CEPT any portion thereof lying northeasterly of the • southwesterly right-of-way line of Realigned Monster Road as • shown by survey recorded under Recording No. 9002279011, and as described in instrument recorded under Recording M. • 91090000611 • TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Southwest 16th Street • and vacated Monster Road described in instrument recorded wader Recording Noe 9805301074 accruing thereto by operation of law. . PARCEL 8: , • That portion of Government Lot .8 in Section 24, Township 23 • North, Range 4- gas:, N.M., in in County, washingtorn, described as follows • Beginning at a ,stone monument on the center line of Permanent . Highway 9o. 30, said stone monument being at a point of curve • designated as Station 138-16.98 in Survey No. 1143-Gt thence along the production of the tangent bearing southeasterly -from this point north 8 degrees 52'19" west 284.25 feet/ . thence north al -degrees 07'509 east 11,8.24 feet, thence 'north 33 degrees 06'SO'' west 109.19 feet to the ' ' northerly line of the right-ot-way of the Puget $otutd Electric Railway t thence north 80 degreee .40 '20" east along said right-of-way line 7.,3 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the northeasterly line Of the rsght-of-usv or the main line oe the Northern Pacific Railway, said part of intersection being the true point of begrning of thin description; thence north 80 degrees 40'20' east along said first mentioned right-of--way 157 Fees, more or less, to the west line of the Northern Pacific Railway used for a aa rryye; . thence northerly along the said mentioned right-bf-way 355 • feet, more or less, to the ;met and west.center line of said , Section 24; - • • air d 3I Di SNI)IL3d 01 en ltl l D 54 i maul it f-o WO8d 204,0 6661-0-LX thence westerly along the said center line 390 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly line of the right-of-way of the main line of the Northern 6acific Railway; thence eoutheasterly along the said last mentioned right-of-wav 466 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, Being all that tract of land lying north of the right-ef-way of the Puget Sound Electric Railway south of the east and west center line of said Section 24 and between the main line right-of-way of theJNorthern Pacific and the right-of-way of said Railwa r-i sad for a wye; EXCEPT that portion thereof deeded to )Ring County for Slack • River a'unction-Renton Road, tinder Auditor's rile No. 2919484r AND EXCEPT that portion of said premises lying westerly of . the east line of Southwest 16th Streit, TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Southwest lath Street and vacated Monster Road described in instrument recorded under Recording No. 9805201074 accruing thereto by operation of law. ;ARC= C; That portion of Government Lots 6 and 8 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in in County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 7.l4 of said Section 124r thence along the north line of said subdivision and .the' north line of Government Lot 1, north 67 degrees 26'22" west 2892 .05 feat to the northwest corner Of said Government Lot 1, thence along the west line of said Government Lot• 1 and Lot 5/ south 00 degrees 28'19" West 2299.77 feet' taencs south 89 degrees 33 '41° east 1909.89 feet to an :.ntersection with the easterly right-el-way margin of Monster Rand per the City of Renton'salignment of August 3, 1988, . said point of intersection being a point on a curve concave to the west, the radius point Of which bears south 63 degrees 48'41" west 367.11 feet; thence southerly along said easterly right-of-way in and along said curve an arc .distance of s5.220 feet through a central angle of 08 degrees 36 '5S" to an intersection with the westerly Metro (formerly Burlington Norther) boundary as surveyed and shown in Book 40 Of Surveys, page 180, said point of intersection being a point on. a Curve concave to the southwest, the radius point of which bears South 57 degrees 10'13" west 1134.00 feet, thence southerly along said Metro boundary and along said curve an arc distance of 250.i4 feet through a central angle le of 12 degrees 38 '19" to the westerly margin of the realigned portion of Monster Read and the True Point of Beginning: thence along said westerly margin south 41. degrees 55'32 ' east 68.5E eat: thence leaving said margin south 05 degrees 23►10u sat 321.59 fsec along an existing,steel post and woven wire fence. line and ite northerly extenazcn; . D8'd 3100 SNI>N3d al. t n IU ON7WW003'LLI1 num woad 9A:L2 665.E-ea-Ise • • thence continuing along said fence line south 04 degrees • northwesterlt y4of t69 heecerterline;ofawe ington State 70 .40 Ei rayet No, 1mh; thence along said parallel line south 66 degrees 53'O8" west 14.10 £net to said westerly Metro Boundary at a point on a ur a concave to the southwest, the radius point of which bears south 89 degrees 58 '23►" *at 1134.00 feet; thence northerly alone said curve an arc distance of 399.09 feet through a central angle Of 20 degrees 09'5,1" to the True Point of Beginning. • PARCEL DI That portion of GoVernment Lots 6 end 8 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,, having been segregated by the realignment of Monster Road lying southwesterly of the realigned reedway shown by Record of Sury ° .in Beak 71 of Surveys, page 11. -filed under Auditor's Plle 7o. 9002275011, described as .follows: • maginning at the northeast corner of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; thence along the north line of said northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 and the north if of Government Lot 1, north 87 degrees 36123" .west 2693 .05 feet to the northwest corner of said Goverment Lot 1; thence along the west line of aid Government Lot 1 and Government Lot 5,- south 00 degrees 36t19" west 2299.77 feat; thence south 85 degrees 33'4l" east 1909.89 feet to au . intersection with easterly right-of-way margin of Monster Road per the City of Renton'a alignment of August 3 1988 being a point on a curve crrnca're to the southwest tie radius point of which bears south 63 green 48 '40" west 367,1,3, e et; thence southerly along said easterly right-of-way margiin and along said curve an arc' distance of 182.73 feet through A central angle of 18 degrees 3l 04" to an intersection with the southwesterly margin of said realignment of Monster Road;. thence southeasterly along said southwesterly margin south 69 • degrees 31'09" east 11.12 feet; thence south 41. degrees 55'32" east l94.64 feet to the True point of Heginnin , . thence continuing along said margin south 41 degrees 55'32" • east 270.82 feet to an intereeCt4on with the northwesterly right-of-way margin of State Vighway .1-L 'as shown on Record of Survey filed in Book 40 of Surveys, page 180, said point of intersection being a point on a curve. concave to the southsaeat, the radius point of which bears 'south 45 degrees ,l8'a8" east 905.37 feet; thence southweetexly along said northwesterly right-of-way margin and along said curve an arc distance og 8.2i feet borough a central angle of 05 egrecs 34'57" to an Intersection with a line parallel with and 70.00 feet northwesterly of the centerlines of said Bighway: • • • • re'd sico SN I*13d 0.i Lin -pemtauco I1,a I.ro Kam se=L5 newt-3 -J J • • • • i1ii r thence along said Parallel line south d6 degrees 53 '08P west 125.69 Meet thence north 04 degrees 18'037 west 14.69 feet, thence north 06 degrees 22'10►' west 221.59 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 'SND OP EXHIBIT "A-In • 50'd HI00 SNIXMS4 Ol en 7141 311I1 Dilnn woeszeiza G661,9a-Lal IJ .- IJ-=m c.KvrI, raye if i ` Poe Vectra, LLC 1400 Monster Road S.W Renton,WA 98055 FAX TRANSMITTAL December 15, 1999 1 of 1 Alan Poe Poe Engineering Inc. Tel: 253-833-4052 1314 8e'Street N.E., Suite 102 Fax: 253-833-4053 Auburn, WA 98002 Dear Allen, Please use this letter as confirmation that POE Engineering, Inc, is an authorized representative to act for Veetra, LLC, the owner of the property at 1400 Monster Rd. S.W., Renton, WA. Please let me know if you require any further information or assistance. Best Regard C21.___:1/4. : Dennis Schober ' Manager OCT-01-1999 15:25 C1TY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.01/02 t 0Cry a Bente • ' PII3/P Department 41 _ * ' 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Date: October 1,.1999 TO: Alan Poe FROM: LESLEY NISHIHIRA POE Engineering, Inc. Development/Planning Development Services Phone: (253) 859-5121 Phone: (425) 430-7270 Fax Phone: (253) 859-5207 Pax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: SCHOBER, INC. Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 EXPANSION REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please [(For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Alan, Attached is a copy of the waiver form for the variance application. (Sorry I just now got to it!) I will hang on to the original until you bring the application in. I'm still researching the previous site plan approval to see if the revisions will be acceptable. I will give you an.update as soon as I have one. Call with any questions in the meantime. Thanks, Lesley. Renton . Ahead of the curve DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 21 '1999 ECE9 VED 1 1 1 ..1 . • I. OCT-01-1999 15:25 CITY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.02/02 , -- EVELOPMEIIIT SERVICES DIVISION • • WAIVER OF SUesnriITT'AL REQUIREMENTS Kirk- LAND USE ^,'"",..FONtiiuttlo$t("Irszatift#Atl.,..,1k,i*-itea$41701P.igo:iL,Farct. otP,10,,,Fvo,,I.A.,,,..Haw,'kilp,....z.no.i):0.,,,trp.t...:, 14.04 . APPLICATIONS .. . .,„:„:3 .,,..,,,..,.....,,,..,........:„.,",..,... , ..F.;.•10... .. ...}.. .o...v,..4.4.:::4:,..3..j...4,,, ,.., 1.:4,;,-6.:.,....,.....0x;i:i.,...i'k.;?•::::01:........,:: ::.::4.44A.:;:,.kk,A4:.:•:4,,o-qty-t.i,.•:00K,r.m.,...:,.::.. .i.,7x.:4,...4::..,•?.:•:,:b.::.r....k4...4.,:a4,•:.:0,,...:::.:,.1.:!:,!-2 v.:::::;..n...i. calculations, Surveys • • . _ . •.•-$,...:4,,,,,,0,--t,,..r,..-.1.,....--4.ii,;;;:,‘,4r:;:i,;•.,,,,,•i.:,•::•;:•,,,,.:,,,,j!K,:i!,;,z,:. .:r.Ig*...gi:lii., lfa:;ii;:.;;;;::•;‘ i..k..,.....1:::,I4-,....,:;4,40,:.4,:....Ifir.:•:...14:4•,,,:orr...,:,,v,1,,,,,:...to.,441,,.:.,..i..........,,,o....,,,,..,,,,%.•,,,....;:e.,,, ..,:dq,......,.;.:,$:•:„„,,,,.„:„.,,,•:1.,:•,:„...............,•:•:„.•,•••••4.•,....)••,.....,,,,,,,,3•:,.i.,,,,,,,,i,..!zit.,..........„•••,..N...,:::„...:•„:•—•„:„.,....,,,..:,....„4„:3:•:.;:::::::,.;.:1:.;.:.:.;.:v...,.., •••••••••,..,,....:.:4.:4N`Ng.,4:,.......04.1.1,1.......,W.,.....•04Vel'VPr.:.....................................;n:•:t.:Z.: L,Wh 1,0 :;O:t... ::,:...: ::,.:N.:.;:f:::;:::k:..,;::;.p:A.,:g.....:!:k...f*?•:,rii".,A,:::.:::..1.;:3:,...%.:,.,..,;w:•;;;;,•,;„,,,,,.. Drainage Report -''"--` '"'"''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"Vi';;f:':1:$:''.:1;:qi;P:'::;qi,01;i:..,':,,:•:;1,..,',1.:4k.....r.'.::AS:=1:::', ',.....e;Pic,Fit=????-?;::,:.i.r..P.f40:44,i.:??:,:iii••••:?,ii:.$ej.4,p;.:..:ig:i.. .:...1p,r,:;•.;::,:::;;;.;;;;;I:.;;,;,,,:,.,i: EfiViliatiiiiF.Aiiritrati5i4i4=Z,m.';',.0.•V.,.....N-M.::%.!'.1..M.•!. ..4,....t.e,.,..,.......,...:.,..,,,,,i,,,..../.:,...r.:.::".,: 0 10.,..:4••,,,:•&4;0••••:•11,,,,,,,,,,,I.,::,,,,,,•'•:,.'•:.:•.:•:1:.i...,.,.......,•44%.•:1,,,,0'4,4',. . ':'. , .. .40,.....'Y..:4,...•••:';••‘.:':.4:;.:,,.:•:•.rar.....::: ;:g4.:.:;:%•;•:;•1:4,!1•'•.••••?•!•,X•:•.,,•,•:Kr.1.,•,:t,..N•fi.,:n:',::•....34,:4•,..;.!:..114.!. ....N,V..X.;.:..A,,,,,,,..^.";:,;',;.:',;'::N';'. ..:Z.::!:''i'..'i,;!:‘•!,.;:,3.,:..!'$:.,:...,.:.,:.,.:: :1..r..^,••i.ki:;:4341.x.r,W.....16,,............,..,N,'N t±;,::....r17.74e.k..:*:,3:::::•:...:':::.:i.^1:•:x1,:tk...... ..-............S,A,M kfil:.:,;•,:ii •I':.11:::;:.•::::::4:',..:4:.:i..,4.4.3,,, •:•,,,mr(....,,,,,,,,i,AV.::•••:..,..::•:•:'4t,:t.,;1,.1:.A.:!.44..:...;.:',.,....,S.,,,,,,.,,,.......?,;.;.:.:.:...2 • , Elevations, Grading 2 • Iet ri ItTrip.4.' 111-VOMIer ici n kW'N'''''C''T":.:::".: .-.'1'...t.'..4'1..'''''::'''''4,'''•'''''''''''''''"'"-PlY4,•"%f',.....A'M••:44,":"4:.•:,•:•4r4:4:;• ,.(•:•;',,:••;•:,:,',.•'':.„••.;,'. .,:.:f.".".%":',!:.:%,r,..,...:::E....,•••::,,,,, tirStirlg:-....eyykp pa.IR,w t.mx¢.4ghiivrytfoVagMt.=4 ,4e:..A.........-0*i,,,,M;LA::ilotra>.:;::::::::::a;i,:,1,4:;:::: ;1:;',.4..;:0,:.:::.:.:::,:;1,,:•41-..,..;:zw:..1,:t.,:,...t0!.:':r:sq,-(..k;:,:,,,..::. :;,:',..,..,,N.,;,:•.,•:,...,.::•:..,. ........v.m.:,•:::... .;,s..::!....:,... 1...:-.444..Y,eli.o•I'm 44.4,4•,......,.......',,• .,..:,:"..,:r.::','IA,:::',Y;:.. '';,..:.:,4:::::•!"..:31%...,:••••.::::::,:,::0,(..,::,,,',.hilrir,i,,,,,....:'.';'........ ...'"tr:i.:::::::'..:::::".=..,•'''.•' •••.,.,.,?.,?................i?.....• .....,.............,,,.....,....m.....,,,......,., Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)4 • . ''';',3;:'4,1•.-:;,....`,,,:;',',:•'.4.'..':."7:4:2"...mv•Pxxx .n'i : Aisw. 4.1:414,-ir.,:.,:to?.4.,.. ,•11.:T i..:iir,m?.,.11,....k*I,......r,..:.:,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,::::.,:,...:1.3-..<41::::::•,.f.. ...,......:,:::::,:::::=:::::•=. :,.,...i,,,,,.apAtapplicab e:•.x.!r;',...."%i,;.4.,•••:i.4,:::A.:,.L.:*,.,‘.6 ,•:,...:::,....• .•. ..,:ii:••*::::i,••;I:ii:: ..........::„..;:i:. ..K!,,..r.,. .oig., K.;:.,..:1,.i..ti.....:.:,..<.:,•,,,,,.:itim:1:•::,*:;:::•• •:„.•-•,:...,.:,-..-:,,........:-....,.-.1t!,,,,...K-:,,,...:,......fr: Fitod 1271A nivi ..,.....,..,..:•,;•:„:„::,. ••.:•,..:,...........,.:•••-••,„ , •:•:„,...„:,•:,•::•:...,:•::::.....:•:,,.,:•:::•::'::::'::::::V.. .:;X: ....,...: ' ...1...^,•••:.:.•:.:+.;.2.1VM:'.!;:l.;'..k::.:;::D.;V:V:::"..:v.,W.i4P.. i,: ...., ,4..,..1.::::::,::::.:::',.:.!;:...:..: V::M...1.:*::,i..:;.:..f...:i,i;:.,•:-..,:.:::.......::;.:;,,,::.,•,!...:,•.;.••,...:. Floor Plans'3 AND a. .•..••••,...;•,••%••:".r_...^.'":".4`.', '!.:'''•'•.•.:.'.::',%:;,:•%'...•'. .. : .0.1 ••TA*,;.,•:i'gra%1:;.!'ii'N..:*,;.1,. , ,...,:•:,,., ..,,..,_, , ....,,i,o,...1•::,:',;;;;., :: ...,,,,:.,..:,,,im,,,,,%.,.•,•,•;•.!%•;47.7,:777.7. :::,,,,:.:::..,,.;.,..,. cieatOOM11O1,•;KOOI210iwg,::•.".:',':..'",.':r:::•:::•••'':'r.1:•.:' :',,"..t: ...'41;•'''''..::...!P:'1::::V=g',:PN:Wi:N:R=V41q., '..;,i,:g,;•?,:?'4:,.',!:!,'.:::!!:;!?;:,. M'il'.V.:4A'',..i!il:;:'.';':',.'.:''.'j;!';!'.:;!.',!::!!V!!!:::::: '“'"."'•r.: ''''''•''..' •'•:••••. .k.•''."'''':...""'''''''''''',':'•.."' .;....":.::.::.,?..:;':*•:=':.::::! :••••:::.,';,;.:;*,i'&4W,•,:,•:•,•,::Pqx.,',.;:t.:,..,4,.,::.i..:ri::!;:!::!:';',:V.:2:!:;:l ..1...A..x.i:,i.it:::,::::.14,04,....,...”4..11.,...;k:;....zr,m,,:h.::;:,:.t.17,!;•;;.:..,v,,!,,,i!A,j,,..;;,:•:;,.„::,,-,..?.:,,,„,.,„,..,...:, Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 areOfrib.:10lin...;•:Dgefia:15.1."•-1,,'.1-:•!n::?': ::'..1"-'!:::4EZT.iiT''N iit?.:,...tk:fli... l'.1.} ..`40':!::Sii4I.:0-;:1,4,1.'%'4.241: .:',:t.,•,..gigig.11,:fr:•;lif•iliali.ARia..*,,,.i.,!..,iiilt':en:i1,,l'ii,„ii,Iiiii•ki.,:'iiii ...,..:...•........-..••••••--J••••:••::••••„:1•••,..,:,,,4:;:• . •, ,:,..::,:::,:N:.:,isr...w4,:•:•i:::3„:„.......,:.•i:,.::,,,,,....7:4..r.,:.6,:i.,:v.v.:,...:•=3,.:.;;:v.,•!,...,„:„.,,i,.:,:i:•.A.,,i::•.*:ii,.f..2,;;:::,,wzizr.:.:i..:i:,:.:,.: King County Assessors Map Indicating Site , ..."5..r.*:".7:•....".-:•.:-.44.:.••••••••,'..:,:.::.,V.,,,r1:',:lgt•-•::i.^::`•;:?'27.:.;:.:',:::.::':.',..',,,i' Ve4.:::•;t::,:',...*:.:?,,2•M •:,,,1::fr::::::!!':"At,:f:::::::,..1':::::::.Zi: :: ;r4..',......,:irvek.:.::Ipial,/.:V..•;:h":::r.:KT.::.•77, "ri. .... „i:if.:4;:4„:.:.:;:r.;:,:f.::,;:F.:;:::::•,::;........:•.• LbnaSeaPI ng:Fla nil:'00110ePtUai'V'i•''..',:''',".••• :'•:'.":"'''''"":',:iS g'!•'::::',...'?".:tr,:',t.i.W.=:"i'';',;:4•4`..;•ii;::'•''''''',$:4'.',...'',-'..4.,%,..k!".....n.:1=ii:Z!'%i'l'i'''`a.'‘..:".ZE''''I'"''''''''i'4'.2' -','',..1! =•;• •:'.'"="IP''''''ii.''''''"*: .: "'""'''-'"''''" ''°''•''••• ••'•''''.-:;•-•"''''''''''PI'.'`''''''.:'",".".•••"::•(•:."..X."":• 4 ''1','.'''"':'"I '''''''.-":':':,•'').::•:"!::•"M•••';'.."•::''',.3::••••••....' ::•', "''':":',''.....::':';'::‘•::::.:..:',..:T.•:i•Vi•i•Vi,4•••.”.: •.:,.,!....r:•i':.'••::!:::.•'.•:•::::::::'.n.:-•::::•.V:•••",: Legal Description 4 . st'or Surrounding-propety-ooiit,••"n:•7 Xs:',... ••••••.•...•'•• • • •••'.•••,'••••••,,',.-...:. '.....':-.'..,:••...,,,..4.:••,...,...÷........••••••••• .......•.. •:,,,. ...,,.,,.,..........,................,..„.. ,.. Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 1''•4.•••••'•,'''''''''''"'"''''''.77---'""'"!`'..:.•,:••:.•4414•.' :•"""''"•••''::"...''.''`.;'.`"7,•:'',...x.; .',.••,:i:',z••:.••.:',4•,•''•::';:••••:•••,:11::!ii:',',..1',!:',:,n*:;::::•:r::: .:::•::i:',.:,ii,•:.;.,,3'•'•;:a,:•z...,•••!t!'.e.;,'.':=:::'":::•:•!:":"*.r.:ilil'i::".nic:::.:i.,.:•,:;,.,,,, ,. !••!• ',•.•':".•-:•!•',:.::•:..':.. Map Of:Existing,.Sititon4!KT o 4 • • .: i• '• ...3, • •••..4 :•••••'', ••-•,• ' '.'...'::t.p;:e.g:i.:::.:::•:.:..i:•••••••',<•4, •1••••....%•••••%::.:17.;:•:::.':.:::w...-;',,,,,••••:•:,.••••:••.-....:, ..- • • .',...,....,..4...... ,A. , .. .. ..,. " :,', •.•• •:. ,. .... •:.•:i•: '::.:!:::::::,!:::.•:":' ;-..::'':::r.,, ••••• •:•1:-.•*"'''-`,'''•'"':'::- ::,":::'„:',':;:::i":::%:',:$•,,..;.i.':'W::!'i,.',.....!":,..,,!1;,,,.::::.:::!,:t.:•,•:;.:::••,',...!r.-- Master Application Form . . . •A.'A'''.'Am .a' Cardsl.'I. ctr.•.-.r i0•—..,•,,.::.r"'.•W..'.0..H"-...A."..AI. u:':u .rt..T.A0.,A..'.;,0:...i..'..::.,';.'.,..',1!. n".:.'„'','•'.,"...:'...1.:'..:.:::..t:.,',.::.:.r.0l!i!0':.;1i..:.,.,A,,.'1...,';..::?...4i..i.,0.,,........,:::.,,..„,...`.'.,.;:.,!•;.:''::.::...„..it.:,.',:,:,y,;.,4i.t:.".:4`.....=.....:5:.::$:...:.):::...itF4.::4..::!.,,,,•.:.•..•.•:•:•;A:i;i•.,,.;..,.::.;:!,:.,:;,*:::,....,4..,%....Z,5.1.,i.5'n,i,',,'.,a::.....;,......:::......1....,*.:.:,!;...'t....'i...,:...:.,...;....,.:....:.:.....,,::::,........,..:.,.:,,.:..•.,;•••••,:''.'•,.....,,,,'.".':',','T..%M :1:I.:i4:;:•'•Z:.•'44.,•••:•:',,'..r••••4• .q.k.','Vq.::•,.,:::::;:.:1:,,:!”'.....,••....!.:,:,:::::•:::,,,sr,•••••::,:::,:?•,;;;:•;;::=•::::.;::::::;...r„:::::::::?...,:,,,. Parking, Lot Coverage&Landscaping Analysis 4 PlAdE„....,....,,,,,,,,, . . ......, ......n.,........4,,,,,,A,.,,e,,,,,ii..,:.:,..,,..........m.t.iftl,::::4:,t,:,,,Tv;m:, nr,,;;;;..f..%:,:4:::;:i.f.,:,,,...::;.....,:pmr,,,inp,g,..,,,,,!:,.....A.T.....;;....,:....4,/,..m.17k,:q.,.:!::::::::::.;:x.!!:%:.,5...:.:,.:,.:•.•!••,,,,:,•?..:..',.1`......Ze•''.:(.........V.W...:....'.!..4. tedUcti .(PIMS) .4;•:•.'••••••,.....;••••••• .••••,•••••":••••=ed, ,..:vi.••••,:?F.;....;.,x,::::.i..:-..i.,....v r•••...:,.;,,,;...,,.,:..i!.:......::;!.z.;;,.....,.m: ••••,...:=•!:..:!:!:,.,.,...,,,•:•„,:r..„....,..,,..,••••,•;:,::::•:ti,:•.,,,.2::::,..4:..,„:?....:itF,,,•„:„..,„•:„.„,•••,:„.f.:::.,,,,..,:::•,:::.,.„ • • ...• • -ons•• : .. --,..1:::...........7.-..::...„:,....,..,..,..„.....:,.,..:.....„,::•-•::a •,..!:.rem;!:...:,:;:r.:1::.........„1::•:•:m....,p•-:•,:...:0.,...4!...!:::m::,..,•.:::.,,:.,.5.•..a.m••.<1;.,.....,,!::zw,.,..,,::.::::„...,...:!::•..10;:iwe..!::IN:,...J..,.:...c.:•;,:,...,;:...i,;•,,,,,,,,.,,..„,.:,..„!•,;:.c„.:Rili...., Postage 4 • ....... PUblidWorks•Approval LH.''.E,.:.'...1.i-.1p••.•'_''•i...''.''''” '''''''''''.,''.''.''.,'''''.,..",:.!;.;•:z••••..'N,...'.''::-.:::;]:....I " ;:"',:;...Y'$,'::'::i:''f':;-'4.::::,:''.•'•:';:'.•.•.'..%'.'••.••••.;...:::.,:...,:.:..:,:...2..••,=,,••:•:.,:;,•.,;..:.!,.:,:.:•'•:•:.:••..i•;••i••.::,•1f1.•.........7.:.•-:' ...:L•-,.:r•.y::.:..i::..4,;.•.:.:::•.•.••.!.:••.••.,.n..,,....:..:,!,:,1,::•;,:',:•..n:•••,,:.::•::.:.','...i....•.•.-:•:-...::•:;',;.;...;•,..•:,...,;,,;.,.....•,.:,...•.,,' ;::::1::i;?..;.;.::: '.:,.•,.......i:,::':;:f.::',:::.::.,:,;!;,;::;::".:'i::.:;!;..i.:."... •,,,ii.,;,:*3,.....:'„,'''',1':::'.i.V.4.',.:, :::•;.,,•::,::::••;:ti:.;,.:.:•:..::....: '.., Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 . L , . . .. . • ....:,,,,,••• • .•••••••••,....,...:„...........„ .,....,,::::::;;N:...:7.:,:;..:•:.:4,:.,:'',".::e4.r.,01:•.,,.•:$,!:1';',,::r'.';', ....:.',".:1'':i....:V.W.I.Iir.,:;',$8.`,.:1•:1.?;•.;.;;'''.:',:•;: :%"if..::".:!nZi,..."••,:,,,...,:',::,'W:"*.`''.:'' '.::'''''".":".''':Z''.•:..,• Topography•Uon ig .,......,:.e. .contoUrsps • •' •••••.....,....,.....i., ,.....r............,;•••-in..,;..;•.:v:;•:::::!..,...,w*......,:•:••:!....:,..:.1....g;4•,?•Apr.,..i.,,,:::.4:::,..,,,,,,,'.:ei.':::`,,,:n,':;N:;i'*:!;:l.g:Mr,;!::,;:::;:li,V:::'1,0 4'....,....:•••••,, • r • ' - "•:'•.•.1..,-:.',. .....:•••••.•.-4s:,••%•::•.,M.if:CiMn!':::':.:::-:••.::•%,:•:.:.,,:,:i4 •!”•,:...1,n4,,r,i.V4:i:,::=,:%;.44;::‘,1.44;,1:;1.,zi...,?,7,;:tr;.;•:3:;:i:!b:,::.:1:i;iizi::;:i!,i;:•si:;;i:',:::':..ii., Traffic Study 2 . ••••,' .....-..... • ' • •-...,••••,•••••• ,:•,...••,...'...:....:%!::••:•:•:•••:...•••3w.;:t 1....1',.,4,,,:':.•:..,....•••••••••••;,...:..p.,.i... 4...c.A•a•,-.3:,,,,,:•,,!;;;:i.g.:“.:-..r.,,....,..•,*.:.;•.•• •,...,..5...........r....,..:......:••••„.•••••-:,...•.::., Treo.0 utlinOiVecletOilo•m Clearinti,'Pidet.4...-...': ":,1 :=•••••'.....':.:•.:,,•••,,, ,is.; ,,••=.-.;:,..:-:;-...rz,3ki.:, ,,,.....,,,4,..:;,4;wv*:;:.:,:p::.,.; ,:„...,,:::,,....1... ..i.,...0i:•.,i,... ..,1;‘,..44;v:4:":::, • •• .• .:.............„., ,,-„, :••• :,...:,:•....,..:•.,.•,....;...::: .,.............4.;: zn.l...i,,: ....,,...gg::.1.;•..:v.:.:::::::.:,.c.:;.;0_.„.,„:,;•:,, ,ft, ...:;:.!.......„....,,ifi.i.1.1z!i.,...5:::R....;„:„.,,,....:.•,,eiti.,:c::i;•.,,m.!,r.::R:•;.,,,q;:!. ...- Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 • , •••,-,,,,,,,r, ..-,...-. : ,••:,..„„?, 0:',.:•,•••:,',:,',"'"...;:'?::::::',.::::, .,..'...•.•:•".:.:44.1••••;•,,,,....:•••••;:••:•:,.......•:,,:,,...:.•,..,..... ...10.:..:,.•.,,,,,,,,:,:••:....,...;,......,.. VVetiarids:D6ilifaAiliciVlagii,:,1•.;." •:• •. . ... ....---A••-•:i,••• .....".11,444kji!ir*4 :=';':ir:T,: . .,...::;i.:;,,.,4...5e4: ??.: :... ,.....:,..:...:•:sh,lr::::ii,,I.,....:•;,.....er.:•,?i:1•;y::.......;,;:::.':;'.:.f.s.....:;,...; ....;:.....n.!>1::•:f.ii...:•il... ,.,.....lnif:' i,i;i1"`,!;;:f::::::t::::::i:..i:i::: ::-.:'•,...Y. :'.i?...T;T:;•%:•!':4.gi......i...1......:,.•;,,,P,:;;;;F,...,;;;',,?!..!:;,;',M4',........,:';:.:ft;'i::;,:::.4:::::.?:,........:.•......!::!'::::,:l _ •. Wetlands Planting Plan 4 . ... - •' ":•%""'•••••• •:''."•••••• -....:':''.'.':'.',..;•iiiii:g.:'":;:'••':',',1*— ...''''—' 7.7.-..`'... ',','"•,..'-'-'"' ••'" ' ' ""'"''''''' '''''''''''''''''" '•••.::''''''' ". • _ This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: SCIAOSTA- SPTIRAC-44- V11(114.11/414( 2. Public Works Plan Review Section • • 3. Building Section DATE:_j2lij 491 - . 4. Development Planning Section . . . • • - . . -. • • • - TOTAL P.02 POE Engineering, Inc. • � �1 nn 1,, //��n Civil & Structural Engineering/Consulting �� � � RF1LI\J�W1J� LJ �[�L� 1314 8th Street NE, Suite 102 Auburn, WA 98002 DATE ` s (c JOBc • (253) 833-4052 FAX (253) 833-4053 ATTENTION C SC `_:-1 TO RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU %Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ct -r . n✓ A-PP Z T wiz k.-12.1Q�(.— 5a_vt _ f- 8 S'E=./E—t / P'.d .c \JAT PS. \ C- - bF Pt -ta c z- A.r1a3. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved a noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned fo corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment. ❑ El FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON C 2 1 1999 RECEIVED COPY TO !-'L:cz✓ Qom» SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING MY OF RENTON !1 0 . POE Engineering, Inc. 1 ,659 [ CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING/CONSULTING DEC LIi w" 1314 8TH STREET N.E.,SUITE 102 6o m, i'' -- AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98002 @'�C. GE E 1t11 r, (253)833-4052 • FAX(253)833-4053 �c PROJECT NARRATIVE I The Schober, Inc . Expansion is proposed at 1400 Monster Road S .W. in Renton on a partially developed 3 .23 acre site . This property is bounded by public roads on all sides (S .W. Jackson Street, Longacres Parkway, elevated Grady Way, S .E. 16th Street and Monster Road) . The site is located in the IM Zoning district . I Approximately 0 . 83 acres of the site is currently developed with the existing Schober, Inc . building (10, 329 sf + 1, 448 sf second floor) which has access off Monster Road & S .W. 16th Street . The current proposal involves a 31, 554 sf addition to the South and East of the existing building as well as paved parking & maneuvering areas, landscaping and stormwater detention facility on the surrounding undeveloped portions of the property. Access is proposed to S .W. Jackson Street and Longacres; Parkway, as well as maintaining the existing access to S .W. 46th Street . The existing facility is used to manufacture decorative laminates for the aviation, recreation and transportation industries . These laminates are made from plastic films and sheets which are screen printed and laminated together. The laminates are primarily used as decorative wall coverings . In the new facility, Schober Inc . plans to relocate production equipment and raw material inventory from their Kent facility, along with new restrooms and an employee lunch room. Storage proposed is primarily fire retardant plastic materials . The newlfacility is intended for use as 60% production and 40% storage . The easterly portion of the new building may also be leased as speculative space . The site soils are silty sands and gravels . Approximately 5, 000 cy of fill are estimated to achieve finish project grades . The site will be cleared prior to construction including deciduous shutes along the south property line. Existing site drainage is allowed to surface flow to the surround undeveloped area / public street . Surface flows infiltrate or travel overland to the ditches at the surrounding public roadways;. Please refer to the Site Plan provided for other project specific data. 1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON :gin t POE Engineering, Inc. �j 1999 9'li CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING/CONSULTING tp 1314 8TH STREET N.E.,SUITE 102 DFC owl 1121 AUBURN,WASHINAX 98002 RECEIVED (253)833-4052 FAX(253)833-4053 JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST This variance is sought for the Schober, Inc. Expansion proposed at 1400 Monster Road S .W. and is a re-application of the previously granted LUA97-042 . The specific variance is from the Medium Industrial Zone (IM) requirement for a landscape strip of 100 of the lot depth or 20 feet in width, whichever is less, along the! site frontage with Grady Way. Table 4-2-130A of the Zoning, Code and the 20 foot minimum width of landscaping. 1 The property is bounded by public roads on all sides with the frontage on the Grady Way R.O.W. adjacent to an elevated portion of the roadway. Grady Way is elevated approximately 20 to 24 feet above the adjacent grade starting at a point East of this site and continuing West of the property. The property frontage within 20 !feet of this portion of Grady Way is not visible from the ielevated public road unless looking directly down from the very edge of the road. The intent of the landscaping appears to be to provide a visual buffer and vegetation between the public road and the site, and appears to be unnecessary and inapplicable in this situation. The difference in grade between the traveled roadway and the site renderithe landscaping ineffective for visual public benefit . With right of way on all sides of the project, significant amounts of landscaping are proposed in other areas within the development . The area of right of way between the property line and the roadway is vegetated with knee high grass and clusters of deciduous shoots . The area' under the elevated roadway is bare dirt void of vegetation. A nominal planting strip (minimum of 5 foot average width) as shown on the project site plan is proposed at this property line, in lieu of the 20 feet required, to transition from finished development grades to the natural grades at the property line . The granting of this variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property improvements in the vicinity and zone . The public, due to the location, would probably not be aware' of the landscaping. This frontage is along an area were Grady Way is contiguous and parallel to S .R. 405 , creating a significant width of elevated roadway, and therefor does not have a visual affect on adjacent property improvements . Schober, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Granting of this variance is not felt to represent any special privileges . The property is surrounded by right of way and has devoted significlant areas to landscaping on the surrounding frontages . The requirement of frontage landscaping on Grady Way in this instance is felt to be questionable due to the elevation of the roadway creating a situation were the property is not even visible from the travelled roadway. This circumstance is felt to be the exact purpose of the variance process . Granting of this variance relieves the property owner of an unnecessary loss of useable property while still providing a minimal width of planting strip along the frontage . The intent of the zoning code is met with significant visual separation between the public roadway and the adjacent development . Denial of this variance will result in significant loss of building square footage for a development that is only proposing 290 lot coverage . _., • , , . . -.. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING - cirt OF RENT014 ,DEC 2 1 1999 . .. RE,' -Es/ED . • _ . — — ____ _ ,. .,...,...... . ., 4-•. , . • — . C.. ... . • ..,. -- f, , ... , - .A) STANDING' NEAR THE r ............. ..,-...-.. " 2 ‘ • SOUTHWEST CORNER OF . --- THE EXaSTING BUILDING 1-. I LOOKING SOUTHEAST. 1 P . .11Nf II Ill ,. 4 r./. / /-• 2'. A•(....'ry- .3,..„4/.;•=', -/.'. 1 • ar .1 4.lr , „-• ;44;:4 . ,,.,:c.,.,h4c, ‘,..„1., .. „ . -,.........„, ,L.....1.14 Lq s;•,,,-:47.,u1,..:.. ,,.---:d,,_4!:4\f'.':'•'..r.11:_AL'''.-,7'. 1....4.,1;!•'..?•"( ,c. '''• 4 r. 1.--I... -..,.., ....',.: 0!'•'..t::•''Itr; ''..'+74.' 7,:>':.;.--?7; %Sr.-;.-•-•/'''''ai.V.-7 r..;"k•:',..:1-f-.?;i*1-'•11,'-'..:4‘*: ',i,e,*:'-' -.:;...--..ry;...;,„-:-:::•„'"7 -,'''.•), ......-',-i:.,.,...„..,-e..,,- ,4„1,:e„:',,,- ___- ‘'....._ '.}kiy!!,.;1•*.,...-,-'..k.,%:.=:?:,..:*,•t',•=.,-01,,;.0',,,,'": ,,,I..::,--:„.-,.. --.::-'...„ ....,_.,-.-s:vt-s-o*- -'..,,_:;:-..- ,..:-:,..:-,`.4- ,.' • .-iow- Lz)„ ,..,.1..c..,..,1%... ..4af-2.;: -.:•<..---Si;.i',-'+,-,.'+'-' '- c''—'-'0=z•-••4--- s•'--' .•': - ""--A_' s' "..-:A-Fa.Acsi ---='-'••: ‘...-., .44,- :--:.,.-'..A.-‘4...:Ar.:74T.r-',-'4,-. , ..-1:6-7,-0- , ., ..-.. ..-.:.•:. 1,:.,,,e-- -,,,i'-':•--:•-1='S,:t",*eL-:,:-.71--?---74,c-,,,...-1"-^4,,,Tr.;-:;-'-`•,------ A-.----L--1' --..---..- :".";?›...Y.,1'''-'-..,,"-- '- - •\,'• •,,,,,,•,,,-,....f...- „,,•,4".144.•,..,•- ,,,...t..cp.F...:,x.,.,.-..•••/„..-1-„,..".2.„-,,,,..,*1:yr:f.-..i..,...-‘).-z-....," ----,---,%-fjG:r.:-,;-,•-..';`...S--,:c124,..? :. '''''• :,,c:',,,-4.:,74-'40 ."...4.,;.,,,...:;1..v-'•.,,,..,,40 -rP'5.7!,%-%'-'"-.,....1.1•.• .;,t...%; %cii..--?.:..KW.','",r,.,i.1:`'?e'.1'14:'-'c''':-.-F,-.;-V•:'''Z--'q-'"--.1;;"-r--' ' . • . . - • B) STANDING NEAR THE i-ftR --....,,..„ --, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF . . ---• ,k.,,,,,,. •••• - 'THE SITE LOOKING - . s„....: WEST. i ......., III till' PI& I' . ---' ; Ls-'1"- . ..... Yr •',:•,,-.' , /tl, /,„:„. r').4C ' "''C',':;',;`i...'1'' • ,...: . „.,1:1 • 'I' . ... ' *. -. "r.711..... bft 1 - .• 4-1..7, r Mr.. • - .. •. .••• ' - , • ..C. . .,.,9":.. ......., .., . :', . 'Ca. .1- a'a,a . r 'r •'''': r r a r ' ' ..1 U ...I I ' I 3 .' ..-0, .,. . . I '.7::Lignr•' - A.-. ' ( ' '-!.."., ,.,,,,,,, .,,,,• _, ,......„„,. . ..,. • I J.L.V, • i h'•• • • ,..,;,, . '; 1.4ar . •`I •.. .,,V •t- "7 .'" •• a.\: ,= ••• • C-:,„!;.(01..t ,, . ----t, 7• 1r, / ---'..-, --"\-,-.J.40*---....1• • -;-1 -— :A . .... V .;.. . c) STANDING AT THE . . . , , SOUTHWEST CORNER OF . .. . • \ •% ---.•, ,...‘ ,t' ,'.. i. .:, , \ r -• •._ ----Y'-5---.....,,,,,.._...._1-• ,.: -..-.0.' THE SITE LOOKING EAST ,••'--..': '=-- -\-- ' I _\.-;-.•-•-•:`.. ''7'', . , ,•,, ;.- : -.. ..--,-,: Lf..-.. -.'-• $./-:, t...-I'" • ' \;',,.. •'`..l'ii-(\ :,.-• , , ,_, , - Ifilif'V,•-• ‘,,",• ‘, , ,...,,I.,,, 1 ..,1, ., ,s„, kl,,•,4-..,•..,.._ .... —•,-, ic.•11,vilic,-. • " . 1 m•••,,,,,, 3,;„ , ,,-.,:" •‘.•c-4,,,-.-,,,, .,: . , t, ,.11,: ., ,\. ..._ fc-i ,;-,-.- , ••=- • .. - •-,4••••• .. •JAI• -,:,, *; . • .1. • 1.1_1:4, l'i : , ri' : . • 1 i,Lr.7„,,, .:, . , ,...„..,,...,:v,„,,, .„ , ., . -. _ . .,...! .h....;:,..P,,', :sti-,i.,.!,-,:, 4,,:ii::''',4'.*:' r, •-Th-k,7,..:......:::‘,--.•%7'' 2..,.i;li".t.',,,F;r4;', d'1. ''''..,,I!e-f.rf'%,;.49',..i.'07/tAVA/56;Wi* A'''' '' ,,..Ac5*: -c.,'Z';':,'"*....A.••••i . ., ;"':•'..;.,:;: . --t7:- i:: - ;,.^.1'..5,' '''V%itii,., :5-(' a''''X'.‘74ii.-tf‘'4.•-' 10); . -'4''''' :: . TA__,3'..,-- ,I.,,;..,..i,‘!;;>-6--..4(4,,.'. '''''',...,.7,,,:k3'114.,-- i''4;IPIIP"'''',11t\:4:01:••,' ,',IA'?:'1:s ../::''..:1*.'''.e•-).fif't't:'':' ‘A',*'1".:‘.'l.;.1."''.:1''''A t?'`...'7(4'1 -..'' 1 '.."r"" '',")....1.":-ft.:'....;::. .7:-Nc....-.7.,'Vi: • As-niLitls4"-4,,,...21.-.4..., • .fi,r.- t.r...: „ •.:•44,-. ,:..,, •,.,;(,-,,N ,:.,:t-„. . ef•,,,,-4,,,,,, .....:.1- -;;-..k.:,:v.,,7,..;,- ,:0''''-:.-,=.;..k .‘"r•-• :-.--'"=.N.Ic-".._._4:1-..r.f.,•,4g,'..._•._- ----..,'•2:4,-:..IL .::..'2 r.-.44•!.•.-Y,V...._'__•1 _:..'.'.-I --...i'''ft 31 ,. t.;,„ii,t.,, t• `1 .".1..'f.)112, ,. ti • e r•TP •,",,+'.0,1- 4 es. f;:e'l 4-4, 1/. e .11145VV . • / D) STANDING ON THE NORTH i SIDE OF S .W. JACKSON ----- LOOKING SOUTHWEST. _ .. - - . . . , • . • -- • .. .1 • •• LA...J-0N•--1 ‘2 - • `:h•-'17.4-4,-----.1i.cliftwww. --'----7.--- i - ,;•-•.,..„...„.Ir.:?•!!!!:?:-.,,,-.,-..,-.-4,.,iii.I.!-.-.. , •ceittag,4-4 izsi-e..1.,4:4..t.7 .iga.14.4, .....,....A..,t,,,,,.E-....$,,,....,..,, ,,.,,.....,,,_., .. . .4.,..i.i.• ..--' ,:- -; ,:•,-.•--.-NIL,~,4- .-- - 1,..-.1. . . . ... . ' '- :54 • - : 1 III• 1. .1porm • kit IE i ,. 4: ' . . ‘;.' t I 4 , ,......,-.,• 1 :.-.•:.:"..-`::=:::%':;•'..i:".,--., ,,'r..., •. :',,,„''':::-11...i.-,,;-,rt,-,..ir.t. .-;-'•-:'2''''''t"•;''i.,-''''';'''-,. --:,-..' ik.,.^..,, '.5,'..t.:f....,...,..'::,....,,,.,..,--;!',..•-::...,..;,..-.,--;,;:...-',-,,z 4‘;•,;',.- -i„. .'".. ., ' . ''',,,. ' , -.2.,,,,-,,,,,..1. .„, ,,.:.•:- ,,, • , •-,.. . •. 4.'.4,..-1. tc.f217_,'?.?.,',,i..),,,148.,,,,,!:,,3#.c. l'.Y..."ei,",41ii,-.e .„,,,..::,;, , --:;,X7.,,...tc?1:7.:•-•'•,,,,*14....,„k:,4:-.-t: *.•-..'"" .;;,.....:11,1Y,;•,:..•. •*,...`• ',!.-.:•:,."..:,:."47,. .•',.;',. .:..." . f.ft.:. .:.•.,5.,',:..,:...-..:;...4,,i1,-;.,'-',:_,..4'...-,,,.;', ., .'„4:. ,... .2..i•-•-•:, , .-: ::.•, ...-':, : . : ..,...?'41. '''%".*.Y!??A•C'-'''4';'• %t•'.•4•*...: ''' '' ...,,'"•';',' 4...4 •11-.•-• .4-*•:.7,;.•..... -4-1,•4•• ... ' -fi - ."........k:VI,l'i,','...;'•.-"..,-5- ,5,...' •:-.•-,',••;''''',.•.'.;,.... .^ ,, ..!„.,,.,,,.3..;.,.,,-,,....,-. .•;i:,, • '-_ ': • — ,,• -„ . . .- , ,_.. . .. , .• I ''' . - ' -'•'''.---- - •• ''' — .,..-.:3V., •-7-,•2,0 -`1,:7 -.%•.'2 .''.•t•--, ...-•A'4-=. .:'-''." .:-.ri-,r r`."'"T..-,',•..,'"'4.,!'%'.-6•' - -,-••• - ••• . ,. ••,,-•,-.:••' •... •• ",`.",--,.1••. ',..1.,:qtrl'o,':,-".h.t""•:3,:-.,;•••,..,..tr,t".,--;.,ftt:44.• 7;/,,.0/4,41pitiA.;.....r.".;:irl2,,,,,., ,,,,:...,,,..,.,..•,.. e a-,,':•:: i4::-,-,7..4,...',,::.:..-r,:-,•,r::- - - • -' 4,,:5 , - • , . ...-_,. ' ------ .--•-: •;ii.,-,.. ,.--......„... . . -,-.......,..,...,...,."..:..--.,,,-.....,!----,.-•,. •. ....3.7??..,......,,,,.,.•..-....,,,,,-,4,...... ,..•--=,.:'•,-;;.•4:„-4.,....;:,..:,..-• . • •..-... ,..,:j...•-......,7.;.• 9-..:,. ......". 6:0 -4 •-•:. , • .,. 7..i.,‘•,-?..,k,,. NN • .. . . --,-. •.'--,---•-tf,t,m74-,...4,,,s6,4*-af,,,.--4_,a,p,•; :l.,F-5.---,61.p.----,.F4. ,•,. ,. _ ...- tt.,*.t:--.------------. -.:,.,...,: -- '11 -1' --I--I ' ' '•' ,.a.,,,..,:,--.';</-',..;-'-.:. N.-„. •-•-•-.. .. ' • r' ..'..-.;;;;;; 41737t7-ttrk,....„, 41----4`.P.1--ty,:tAm4f71,.., ' •4,.0 N.f, .-..„ . . _ , -,....,,......„ ,.,4A.,,‘.,_,,,o .,..„...i.,,,e.., ...i.,,..,...:,..,--t.-....-,„.....,..„ . i-1 'Pt' '7- 4...,twa ••..-.---.2.,,:-,5,,,,. 'v.:- , . ..... . , ,:..-3,1..71.tt v.....-4P,,...,..,..T•Atpkw-1 t .:...;.-,,,,.....,....Ifirs,l'.?.,t4;''.'41,:4414,..z• ,...i. 4:- --" I 4 .,-1 C , e • .. .... Z''Y',.,e'%?:'';'7.'4'1..',i,i'l- Ni,k..., , . ..1 ' ' '•••• '''''','....:,,:'.4:;.,...:.::::'..".%'),fifi,%.V.E....,i,14.;,?,44A40,4;?4,e,,,:. ::•,,,.' POSAIMIceftwe.,...... - _ * • . _„:•-,....,,'-..1.f,9;.,..'r.,.,t'gi,,,'Zt1.4,1;: .•,,:,",,,7"::..i'd%5:,:a:1-,7.7',. .:::.':-.J;;;Z:',.d....l: .--."...4,,,p :..... ,.. . . •• ,.-.74.4..,..-..?1i11-1V'Z.T.I:4 _'%. ''' 1. . -,If".... .",4‘4;'. -,-^'---..'.,, .0 , ;Z.''4j.'.-. 'N'..,.77, ' • --,,,,._, -git7F044' • ."•.* . e .;-... ‘. • . .. •t',.' ' . ,t..i. '4. . E) STANDING AT THE - -, .., INTERSECTION OF S .W. . . JACKSON & MONSTER ROAD ,.;:, ';' LOOKING SOUTH. '' ,:. •:., .-- ,...---e- f,--. .1/4:_,. ->e-• .>. ....- , • " !---..,LN..-- l.i—XL., ,e •C..;c.-41 -1 • NP ..i C ..i.c, .?-4•)4:1,,,;;;:•--.1r4177Vilittr.V.E* -6•.,-.1.,-:„, .4....• . .• . ....-i . . ' -.-----.7.- 1-.4t-0uf.-24.40.3.- ,-::::::::„-... ..---. '---.,-:.:. n • . ' • , - - " '...r.''..4.,k'7,7-r-:•7'.;.74" `"';'111°1!•'' ,.'14.-nr-,1 c'e: 13Fcmio--,e,,,ki•-, •-,t,f..Kiirl'..'.." ';.i.,7)--•,.,-,'•--.-5.7•;2 ''..' ''',.'ija,.•••••11, ,r II II ., • .....s.,;-• 11 ."-';- - ,-... ''''''.'4." -4'.-''''''''' '''''''-' ':'":.''''''' ,i,17-Pir,•;17:06:?,;•'7::rt...i!::;i:r3C1•4,riltift,*F': -' ;''''S' ' "n"."'"- . . • •,. :. • .,' ', 'AZ,' '•• ' - . • •- .,-‘,:=',.,....-"•:..'.:•••' . -=4,- ,'.t‘,' C ..i...-I 4..:I',.,-,,,'.;.0 i..,..,',..V V.,••4•et•4.e.•-,,,-..--,-a.." ' . . . ,-,.. r'''•••••',-••- '--•- ''-:-- ' " • Jr4,3.---.N....4.:::‘,..4...,,',41.7i,2.,`,' 1, .. ' .•• • .t.'" "'• . •',"• ' '.• • g '4,, - • t,,,'••::','N'%;q''''‘'''''...-''-'`-'.444' " . ,,, ,.6k,.•r...,,,,.1: ..,,., •,,,,,.., .' .. - . „ ' • , “:',.. - • , . .1;'% --"•-,,:y.,.24.,.1.--,....',•,:-..,....., .,,,•..,....,-..,-:,..-.7-- -a':_‘,4;...5....•:.i .. :::,:!•-•,•.•,'-' * ....*. . • :- ' . .. . _ . .. _.. ,„..,,..; . ... --"4'''''Kk*---"rPt'int1.- 7:i-:LV"--''''-- ..,, -';,1-vf':.,."'',''''-'''',"I''''-'•,- ..,"r,--"...."4"'Si`..-i.,,,4.,,z.,. .4•C:,r,l'a."4''',,,.."-',':•-,......,__.„.„,;:.;::::`,...--..,7 ;-..-. . .---t-';:w.:!--e-- 41..h- • L:,Lty,"$-="-r: .',•-•.,-....;.,----1;tt4- 1'it.:,-;-.:.-Ii.,'". -,--_-z•‘'.A.,1-7:'.1..",Xqfrn.' -'-'..;::. -,;-••••..--_..,..-,-,----....2---•-,•-•• • .. -. •••:‘ _...,,„..__:'‘'F-"---4. .' .--''.-.--•,-* .tr:,,-. •--i''',::=-:.,-.....-.- - :. ' :'.:...-t''''1.--,:.,,,.1.''', .'-'.. .''''.0,4--,''' ' -..''.' .',-. .,'.7•'..'r 1:17.- .' • -..-...14..;; - ., .---:-•---= .....4*...z.ii.o.,....----,..4.,*_,..t.--.--.6..._,.. .... .,:........,,,,-..„;,,,,.,;, ,,.:,.,,.,.!.;.,:i:;,.,,,.<,,,i,-;;;;j41.-.:,,,,,,i..,;:•-•., -,1,..,:--..,,,4,.. , .......4..„;......,,,,.„. ,,,,1-tt.,- .,,t,...4.:;"• , ;:'`..;:-,...;';'„,,, .,- _'• f.:_*,;,,,,:ri,:is:e . ..,,,, ''' ''''"' • t'..."•••- ---" -rikk;bow",,,,,;.4411- 4...5^1...-p.'7,--,:-.;;-..pj-----.-74T:4•. .....!,' ,.'•',..•- •-",-•,,;:, '•-•-r -••••••:1,' -..,r'-•`-'' .' ;,f-f . •"• ----7„ • '' ' , - •- h' :'•••..:,.:4 2-1;,:-.‘%•'-.1w ..<4 .:z•44k1-•", •:..e.., ":......--..- ;..-.6...:.**-- •. ••••,..t........ ,..••, • . . ' . . • • F) STANDING WEST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ' • . • LOOKING SOUTHEAST. • • ...: ,. . . _ . C- t7-• C)L1 l..,..-.?•A • • I'• ..,'' '" : . 4:'k.< 17 r (' t (------ ,1 ., ,....oa„..;,•-;,...r,,,,„„,.z_,:.._,,fr. i 1 i•i't:jk,"....4 .', .,.,...1/4, -- . --(-.,, .[ •, 't • .2....1111.;17,•:.,.•••.1.= ,, .. . . - •••••.*,,,,,, ,.' , .. ''. :• .. l_Lif .,..e41..t.;:./)''..".4.1....N,.,,,,,F,Ii• 2 •. k .. ..::.'7:1:1'• • --t, -•'-..:;..-ii:,•)-..!.«-..11 , - • , ......- .•,•• ------- . ' - "11211i1611111411 i--4 iii%%-i"-,i.'''.-- 3.111-11.!I Illiii. ' II • i r /1• 11 ...,•444.-,..• . ills- .....)..-.....2.,..-•-:,-;.-;:.,•,•:. ,,,,.'.-,...,/,- -------itOrmliggilw,3 . . 1. k •• -,-.., 7/"...`...; '•"•-•'....."' ''-,.."•'..s,,•.-A;",,-,i,•,.. - i ' -• •.,:t • ,L ,,•„4•. . ,..... ...t. x.....- -t ...,.. . . ty .• /AildnUni:-.7.:.::.' :3-: 1;;;''' '‘'''':. ......... A ... - ,. ' 1''''.' ' ..,-..?W... :V.,.'..1-•,...,, ..-•• :. ,:,,...c..: • - ',7',..;117'i4•''''''14'. • ,.'..1=,-_ J:,.g. : •-•-•,:-.-w.,41.1f.3 • , :,:' iii ,: ,.:4 •,.,t ,ir-,,,•.1..:4-.,:,,,,-:::: .., ,:••• •,,_,..- -.;,.:„:; • , „1,..,.: . ,--•=----•-...- , ,._--- ---,•,.-,_:,..-_-------_, ,. ••••.....,,,,,...,..... :;„,i.:......•-•:.: :2„,....•,.„,,! .... - .,. •7'.r:...-.' ';..'. .410k.• . .,!'. - ?. ,:‘ 4 - .......... r--,_-- ..,,,,,,.....4A...„.,,..,..,."..:,,:c.,,0„,_..., , k—r.,!yr".--„sr., .,,v,,,,,, ,,:::- ... ' .1,,,-:.;:-.• --,7-'''. .;,'-,'..:-:-_,- ""---•••••. •T.' 1 ..''.igi .-;,:..`,.,--; -.-,, ...!:.....-.:!.......-:,:,.,..:,_,-;:e.",.;, „,... , f. -- • " - - .. , ., , 11,Ati.ii.,.-414-Aiaiti.LO*44tf,...-IP, .- 'V ,.,0,N .114.`' ;,-,•...s.'••-rr,; .q.i. ,.,,il -- - - ., • •.. • ' iplt.1,40,,,L., .:-.. .....4.--,...,-.4. . g....,...t.:, ... ,„,_.4. ! . .y. ,-... :.. •,% •.,,-„,....:,,,1-(-..,..,,,..f. _.,...,.pli,:...::7`....',.., ,.'•,,`: -:..' ...•.*:.•.:...';',.,•.';''•-... • ' '''''' i'.''s"..:'''. --•'-'` . • '..'. .•• ..• .:..1. •':,..7..-1,' •-• '''''''''C'••.:.i-*.. *."'...14.....ki ,l'ff1,11.'', _ - - 21.t,L.f,..i'•.H.:.:',:it.A.4Aktt''SI'f..-.?:7 s.:-;:e.,,"7:-;f::;`:?4,,, .:ii-7,'jl..-..--,...:..4,t.'75.;;..,..,,.•:-t''' '.• Y.'.':•..- ". .. ' ••• .. •• : -.."......_, -L., -,,,,, -1.• .3,•••,••• .Z.r.:7;••••:•"--74. •' t 2.:,„:::,•47:.‘-'10•,,?,rfss,4'4.,-J,V.,:t1c.1,..,,•,,,:st,••••,• ,. ,:• .7,'..: .-.•• t' .. • "s ".......m..,' ' ,,),".'.,--''. .',9,„rtrAtz ".1 ,,Tig2k7t„...,1.0.v4.,;`,.'•!•,)::.. ..,.- ,-e..,!,Q 1-•, ts;:,.:;.7`....4,1„.`-k.,-::'..4,,,4-.,_-:,.-•:,...,.,'-s'....;.:,..i,••:•--- . • -: ,"7'4,,•;:-..:-.7.14,, ...•.''...-1-710:40..W.^-,I•kl-.g.f"F'd..!."',Tx..:•',t-•?m'''."' • r' 109 .."''''' 4'44.-'''''''.1.'''''..-•...s....'S.--..‘..—....''-•"''.. gV - . . , . .•...',...1,,,,;,_,:.::::"..•-,'-.7.-r'..-"Mt•;:rrf.'0,...k..Irli'itt`,...........,,I,'i..:P1::'...a.:''P..44-•* `••41'."-',-'1;••4''...• '`.;• :71q,.,:t,417.zer'•44,:k...... .-ki-.'• `'.4' '. • . • • •' • • • . -. ' -- , ' .` "..•- •'..;v----- ',••-•- b. -- . --7-......--...... .2-.....•••,7..... . 'II i•7.7,Nr..—"rivtl•P.fr•M;;Ieig,i414(;14yr4,0»,54,te•§4;., ,.. - ,-;.•.,4,2•.-•?i•-r..-. -.., ••-,41-•-•,•>-• (.3-r' -• .2..,_ •" ••'' • ••,...,...• ,. ,..• .,YMPROiciiir.,,..r._.„...1-......T.,--......„......„..,...,....„. • I , CV ..,. .. .,.,,,,,„ii„,•:::.. ....,...-.--''',..-- _, -'•__-___.--7'-f.„?•••.'",,:`,_t_•?• ::::,,;•••=•-s1,!.4.- ....;:y..t!,V44-1.,:•,..,&•",-,,„.,•-.,?,4. .,_ "..,.• ,..1.,!:4,..,, ...•••• •-•• -- z:,,..zir....• .,',:......,..mirmAr.2,..1,....-...... .,:.-.:.'•' ' - •:-.-. ': •..-,...'..--.-. ' . •---•. ''''.- '- ... , - ••.• .. .•,.,....,..:.,.....-,4-",....,.,,,w,,,T,•:,?' ..ie,,7_,•-••-.....,2_.,,, • ---;;;,,,,w,,,,,..„,,„... ........, •--.-., -.• •, •.••.•,...-....•-,-. ,,:...,.....,,..•-,..,,,,.'7. ... ..,,,,,,,,,-.1,....,D,A,,,,,,........,.........: . • . ....,....,- ...,...,-,. ;4' '''•••'.•'- i',..-,;('',..r4-‘4.'4';';. ''W144:''''''''+''1...r.7,1.4-4?!:-,....: .. = .- ..-.".";fi 1-.,:,....,..,-, a...h.-..,-,,,4,1,.•,.:.-7.*,-.0'I,' •';- '- ,c.1..••••-..--..i•-4-', •.-4.1„.4 stir;74c*.t---,:d.,•;..:, :1 ••',',•141144"14-4;i:,Xiit;.'0. l'.1. •'`?',L;•4;• ".. • 7-'*-S"•4T-•.'•; ;'• \C,".''.\,• ' - 'r,'I- • ' ''' 1...-?, • '•• ,c.-;. 1,,,,,,;.,..w...-:,..;',-;.•;.,-...('-',;.;::.'.-P,e,..':•••;.1..s•-•'•-•-?''• .:.!..--1:-.,....""z. . i •-",•;....Oct'-----7*...;,,",,,:,:: -,'••' -`''''''..472:•4,W4,1„ills• •;:.• 4'1,•_,••.:"•:::%1".10, '''!,1:;•,;.0'_,,,.:.f•i•V•;'..f,_,`tt.F..:;:f0,•-•4gt''1 ;. ' ''''t:'•••ii.\,": '• .. 11-k•,. •'•' • ' \';'''.',,, - ' ' '1,--1 •.. • - ,e. • . 0.:P.1 -- f 1,.v...,,..... . 1.. ,,. 'I.:. IL:--r. '".4 %.t 7.•s' -. . • ,•..' ' ' ' ''•. •,,' •';.,,,f4..i, ''•••"s''.. ,t'•!,"..,-,,•,.(•' •':-,--.1,...• -).:13 ' _••,,,vlq ,..e,.W.4.4'.1.1i :t i'...t A,_.;"'lri0:itlyV‘‘,!rilijNil/., • "''''''';'..,:::.‘...; '' '':':',.. 1 c':• -.'LV:LY.. . . -'... ;;,:,!'i_.., ..::r .-;':..- -'.....,,,"' -,.; :.:-';!,"..''.''''. ;•.";;;•4- -' ;-5-;" .i:.1-",....''•,...•..",..;:;;:ff-rs;J .:;:.'-:*.V*.f'C.. 2r ;:'-1:-.1)::,4“...—.0 1•We... -!.'..t•IW4.1' - .-.., p1V104": .-`0,1`^'-'01),4". v.. •,- . ,,. ',.'• 3 ,•.- ':r:,01,-. ; "-- • . '',L''-'. '•..' .; ,y3,'.,::,•-• ,,'.. ,..",:3,-`3-. 6:1.-,:?;'-'.'f:::.E;;5:;',:ykiff-c.1.14.-4. it,,i,4::;•1., .1,,,.y,501, ,E.; ;”...,4,1:•;•.'"-Z.4.' . `%'; .. --- N ,, • - , ,.,,, . • .0.?;V:4.114,1:k4,r.-'*;'''4-''',;..fi:164.:Tkl;'-'4,4 4;•4:•,-..4 \itir••„sk---f- .4..: • . I'....'",,'",4,,q 1,`•,„...-.414S-4# ,./.:• 1.4...„.. \'• .. , 1 -• • " • .-. Iti..k...4...tAv r'''''' 0"' .e...•'ea.914'..., ' 11' . Pi. '.i.lie•.' .tti'' . , .„ . ' . • • .-... - .,,,......4....,,,,t1t, ,..,-,1%,...teins:,1.;;;TI.k.sr4e.p,•;••,,p ,, .. .. ,..,.. ..,.....,..4",,, .. . ., • ... . „,,. N,,,. A,.. . ,- ..... ..,......,.....,..„ . ....,,,,..,,....•,., . __. tgl,.4.4(.1.0*;;(41°`1'1'°.4 .1 -; .11‘i•1, i.,,,'''", •••,,,,. .‘. ,.. ,% •- "•-. t-, •3.-4 i s.•• ( ) i.tt.,••..,•,. .,1W1?.•'.1•e- • ,•'.:<,T''''',•i:: • N.:••-,•.-,•• ,,,,i• , r, , . , . ,i, , . ',....C?:e..,,te'''',";.c%ry'. t':i..';•":"-.,.4,1 -fr.`,Vt;•1:4;.'..41."4°"....:741...'.;'''''-4:1'..2:it-•:;13.-‘' f.' -at.PA':i"I'''4''. :. - ; '• , :,,,',....-.--:,1.•.; -•,..,. . :::.,f 'L..; °A-44,:,W* • ...ft -ft X11,..... .,. ,,A .Lt 1,1,, ., ., ;.• : ... .... ",...„ ri, ,i-..,.,- , -,_.. , -,.,.....,.._.,. ,,..:.., :..:';'..7''''1"-i• 4,4:',.,".--,; •-•* '.1•,:' 'i,Tft..,`P'•[...:11'A!'' . '••-j-..•''';,. • '. .•'-. -..1,::;`..1.41.::! :%,e,s4:..:.....,..q. iip,".'t.''4,41:..t.4.ttit;'.;"..'.''.'. •.;,';':':.:.:.;:t 7:••;,-.-7.'.'-i.,,,, .. '''. '. .:' -1 Ir-r• i _ ..... . ,. • •.:,..„ ,;‘. ....„..,:::: • :;,.... .,.,....,.., .r.•!:,,. .:,.:,...:.:•.-.,n.,:,..., ..,,,,i.::_•.- ,:11.,,,,,,...,..1 ....1..:), t„,i. :: ::-.:-._,• .:_,....,.....4.1.1,, ) ., •- ,.. ,.. ;,,.._•••-•;,,:•.1:.,••;.efr•-,,i• :.",:' r :: tt! i.. ‘.•,:::-.,tF:tn..-'!.,4 it•!..Pt.k.,,,i,..4'e:.1.CT'ki..i?:%':..."A ,' ' .:`-. 1,•..;. )1.1.:..., • '''.1., • r.: ...*. 1 • ' A . 1",':/;?.*-,4471,1, ,k,..t."e•J.'•;:, 4....•',i i?..:. • t . • ,,..,. . . .....:..7".•'f'!'' ' -e•,•4''''':•44• 7‘;',.i.;;;;•••••:sY4,".•;'.i,,,....',"::;• . . . -- t. 11 1 I ''' '•':•;'•1 '''..'il.,',: :'-'?,A, -.'''''.• s ' .,..••••••.,,•:••'. 4.'14 •.;,4.,••4'-.c•s"'•":14... '..•-.•:• '.• ..,''-'4: '51°' Yt.q.,-s i fi t?..•',7....",•• : • , .. ..... ).`." 1,• . ,, .. .•C 11.!;„I.1. ':— H. • .'". .: .-.., ,• . •• •••••-•‘.*--,....,,,,y• -....1.v,pi..Z•.,,,to,..;,.,,•.,.0...1 ,...t: .• - 4....-1,- ...•;.•i ,:.....3.,.,...;,-?:.......,i-,..1.,•:4. . - • - ;-; •• . i 1 . i . - -,......uf—,....., ,..s.4.14,..,.,z, ,,•4,..,,,.3 i•lf.'I i t . • • . . . , ,, ...• 440,...,ii:i.... , I 0 .•*',....-44 ':-''!'•:il . . q.!--fi':•:•''''',i,',.'iL'il` '"A ••.:•5 .L*li'fA• .,•.f ..• . •. -, ,. 0,3 ...• ... ,„:4.,,, :4.., ..:, .- .., --.0i -..V„...i..,,:14"...-..,,, • . : -;". ' -;,..?•,;.-.. -„ 1 ..;,-.4:0.$ .•,• ' • ....q .2> 4.,••• .... . . ,.i.„..... $ ... it ,,..,.. , . , r.i.ly.„ •'' .-.'.'. ..V.',..:'Sr''.Itti,C, ..•..^,,tt .,,li l .••.; •krP:41' Ver'.Vt....4? • PO:yr- .4V.2.,.!'....',... . . '. , , . . .,.i..,,.i. ,i --"',..'"-,'" i.t., , .,4$0.k I. • .,,.7.....'L....... .. „ .-7..;=`-''"----,.../..' - . ' • . .I.,, . , .:*.,.*.4.4 v..";211.i.'‘I.,*` •..‘ ' .. s•.... I.!; .4 lift'••• ./••. ‘•••••4• • 7-"strit. ‘,.... ?...,...:113.„4e..:1 •• .,:.. ,c..,...„7,,,..,..,•;•;..1.,.*.,0:•:. .... ,,,..5,-,:_,..?•.., :.,.. , .:, • 1.0.•• . ,:•:,-..,--...-,..„0-. timet1:40,g1: ,:+.,-iy•,?..: ,..,•,.„.,....„., ;f: 1:..• . . . . ... . _ • • .........a.„..,410.e.,..„....f,,,......„, ., ...„?.•i: _...;... .„..,4. ,.,, .,,,, ,i,,,... ,i.i 4 ...;, i,..- r,A,,,,,,o,:ivp!,..“.„-i-i-:,., ' ••-• . , , .4: .... ...— - ..tr....246!ft;,-;,j,•.:4!-4....?;';.- 1/41 r4“ ) ' • . ' • ' -, .. •---_,.....ie,,...•,_.+49:!..i..4:,...,.......;:y_ize*...„‘: ..01,4:•.%.,;.Alt,:i-„.. i.4-,::::.!Y . , ....,4, .tt.L,!.,,, 1,,,,q 0,.,,,,,::....,-....:-.,--;1.1a., ,•"---r.1 :.-;'-''''''''' fl.fiP.z....-'wm-'.^7- fliP-$.-r.-, t.I.V.V"'-.'`..-:7•11'.:,•. 4 -- '''•°' - ',''4._i•E• •••••.;:1,! .rvz,....c.,..,,,,..t.f.,.. „...;......:........;4;041.1..., .....: ... . , ,,,,,. -`-a.i.1.5,..f.` .i....,,40.4'-- ri-,-,;,„.•;::4..`r:::1-fh. • ,..,_,,,, t-r-147••:e4';,54;.':...',,!•.:"-,.....!...'..... : . • •' ... e•',.,e4...,...,..,.. -.- ..,4:t 4.- 1 i-''c,.•••••-;:i:j",• ,rii4 ... • -• ,:; - ; , ,f • i • .....,-,..-.••.J,`''• !.-..... • .111. . . . - - • - . ... • ,,r0.-.744€••••,:-...4.-.:4944p.,.....T.ti-.,.,,,,._,..---. - -• • • •-:•••.• ••1-::-L,..: , tv.•••17/...AA%---‘,Irk;sfro,,,,•,-.:14.,--i-4•-•••1.--,-•••: :• . -. • - • .• •..,.- 2 ..., 3.,, .,i.,1,4i,,. .. --,,.'-1--,t,41.-....,.. . . ,?.• -- --'''' ..:" .- -•• . .,• - ...• . 1444... . . . ... . .• ,,•-•,-,,c,- ,-,-: - _-. . , • :. . 74 . .,.. • , 11, a-- --.-- - : -... ... -. - --- - ,5.:i-,..,;,;.,- --,.,.i, 4,--... • '.7 . ' -...„.•-•..,.-14,',`,".-4-4:,. t'ls.-.-!.`4-4.• - -'• - ,.: , ,•••••• • ' - '•- . • .• , ; rw.icr4Ki, ..;•.i-,-,...•-••••••- , . .. •"qi.3..4•••1*-*1-.;•,?••-,•••4.•?,..2,...,:. `•-n•.,-: '•....."1.4:2.----,,,,,,-...!..: -,-. .q•......•'.4r--,.. G) & H) STANDING UNDER ELEVATED GRADY WAY LOOKING WEST. c) NIA3.. ‘ --1 )....;..1.; L- --J'a_As \\ 7 8 o ilitz-til, 1,--.1-4- 4--f-.1 _( , • I No, 'N. •:::],: ::: :• 4:s. \ 4C' Ci° \>' 14 ‘I' • • T ',-.4kk.._,...H T --e-)cs76`43D -•- .• ..2 i`..7.//,,.7..:•Ap4/ ^ 1 ‘7•. I ti mi4-.--:15.i.e7A•9cdp,4NS-1'is;(7),(,,,4•,./34,1 11 PS7T a ST 1 vc it,„a:?.;1 1- 3/412.NO 151 9 10 56 " 19n123A -13i..2 d1o,/D ij.c.'!S5,.,T•4,7•.: ::i..:. 20 •••1 eiNr\\-1.9 , D C. ' -•-- 1- ----a--1.125 .— 0 %„,„, 1\04= [,:".?• .... .. '-.. D c 8 .., •,,c C. D-c-j•fi. N • • - .-\ ---•<' .___c-',,;dip 2' 4- 4. j 1 --i-- 1.3 4).ti - ...ji el EArN . , t..• • - , -5 a -a_ . 51'4! ....- r \ CZ' 0);,-) ,.,sz. R.,- s r 41• kie;""- .: •• :0 STE - \ - REAL :,:1'7-- Dic 9 . -I\ 2 ...;------ . 1 ''''. • Foster Ilt.ad .„ . A,, z,„ ,k,.. . , % ,,, • ESTATE •I S CAMEL - '7 0 5 AP.7 4* • • ii)O. ,g e 1; ft '- Golf • /6) . ••7•• ..\ / k;41 EQUIT I ES o c /0 r i , . raarrik, DC / C.*P .. 0 C 10 12.00& , : N,.... ir----...3 4•,174,... -.t 44 Golf .1^ „\ . \ • r, 2 • 1 32,7' 8 7 b 5 010 - • r' 3 ,.. ' • • - • - *Nei. di' * -t :.• TER Pc• • - ....":••:„. slit,4 - , •::..‘ • -IP 1 N• -.0. 3* . 4„1--; _, .. 1.-:7,4 .-::• .-.- • NIC aRe*. .. e'7'. 1 .4W• SUN r - \\,\\; •.$10 •--.1.;.:1 , Course• . •!....\-34..JA)3. io ,,,,.,, 1 I ...,, \\..., . ... . •, 2),..,, „. 12 - i I ?,\I-eL Z.;01... ,P0P•7 - e ,. ,• - ! • j4I5r5r". I /\ :. • .\ .1\3\•. 55' 8/ lk ' 't:)C;I' 1 ).-.1 • `,,y`' . 0. . _. ' ": — -, - ..-,..,_!_v_ 4,., si ,..... • Ly--U? • FOC - L \• - 10 •••••....:.•...,-,...4:::,..............,,..5 ..., .. , .. • , I i • ; 'c • p•-.4. "S7 IL i.i4iI_7.. TQHs.T...1jF•E.T RCi.•e..C..._-1.AD.,.•'.;,.Li!: < 8 ._ _ —— ...qi:1i. w 1,i4m.I'•f -. -I 6 \- - - w- Ii•.,.BLACK - - - A - RIVER ; .•s • e'N Metro 1 1 \ . ,.., _...— , ., , 1, - - • ' x 7 :7-_- ----,70-Iv .-- "SW. : - %, CD . .01 ____J 51 .., • C '' \1 • . i \ .:7.-- 11".--,:•••°""Irgil.. s : 149.rm-li , „. \ Disposal, i %r .46 V .--7--- \ I -,- ,, LIT 4i r Wm' ,•-e- r.c..4„ - • 0 .---- 0. .„_ , - 1"..... 71 FP-1 5 I e & *t1 • ' / - .. , .." 'i •4. i r....----------Zr" >' to- + I on • ! h ‘Pc+.9 S 151 S T ST. ' '..t.Npvr lir.... ;---.... ffia-Ig, vi % '• ' - 411. .‘e 0 Olt--N 405 IIIF ,.I• 1 , male 4 ,.. ,,Fri--,5-ttio 23 Ir..; ---\.\--. . ....-.... ... :.. 10,4 sT .5 w 157i, ',1-- • I--- S. 15.3111e5T ----••::'• • •... i.p-> -u- , . ..- . - ....--.. ,,.. . . It ---- . /0. ••-.,.... , ..j — . l • • 7, , F /1 .0 I- ' .- 1.4.... . 1 • e-‘ Z- - / os. NZ': 4 . • I ill°***titsf• 01 "4 ::4116111:;lk..it n,-.11 A\ -. ki::,;!:- t 1.-- — --1 \ ...„.„, --;;Ay -/gu ....4..../‘ ..%:•....-:7-011.74. . : •.. • •. . • Aq •.'• .1. RKV17477-'- 1 CT, 5 w 1111-;;: ::'i _II i • \T A •••.:.. .. - . i ' . —3 cCZ IIIIIr/ I : i •'.I.-I;PI i._. . ait ' ' ; 1 . - ,,___. '' 1 H'fi Southcenter0 z.:.;,- --- ' . . . , . . : BA xf Ft 8 LI/0 ' r40,0'Alat•..?12 I N • .,,_„,, ....., ',..4 II -,.. ..... ..... • .• 1.'74, - •. .. . . .- - . .., lc I.i.::.:..:.:.:....; ca i I ! , In •• . '• - : •: : . : : . •:...4.,, ... •• ••%.. . ••;•1 '.i.:011 c:53 1111;11,...., 1 .._... I .,„ 25zo "-J —Tr---r r:ii-V':=D .., ,,L= A.' 1 riz 26 . . ., a_ jr;" . 0. . . . x r II: .. ...; t.:::„., :... .::;i:i:7•!;i::....:....,:.. . ;..z.s7: :::;.:: . •••• ,•••••••;„.**nisid:::imi*i:x.:.:.:..:.:.:. ........ iLizbr GP(. q: RENTON -L.JR,EN I PLANNING ..0.7. i.141627 i ii gi.....i:,.*::::„:n:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.,..5........ :...... pr:r 2 i.:1,,, - 4 c, pi..o. 1 tr • ii a • ................ ja IiiiI:: ...--... -..: -7 7• . ••••••• • 1 •• *************************************** ************************ City of Renton WA Reprinted: 12/21/99 16 :32 Receipt *************************************** ************************ Receipt Number: R9906331 Amount : 500 . 00 12/21/99 16 :29 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 12.55 VECTRA LLC Init : JEJ Project #: LUA99-184 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 242304-9037 Site Address : 1400 MONSTER RD SW Tot=1 Fees : 504 .29 This Payment 500 . 00 Total A L Pmts : 504 .29 :alance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00,. 0019 Variance Fees 500 . 00 i ************************************************************.**** City of Renton WA Receipt ************************************:*** ************************ Receipt Number: R9906332 Amount : 4 .29 12/21/99 16 :31 Payment Method: CASH Notation: POE ENGINEERING Init : JEJ Project #: LUA99-184 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 242304-9037 Site Address: 1400 MONSTER RD SW Total Fees : 504 .29 This Payment 4 .29 Total ALL Pmts : 504 .29 palance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 .519 . 90 .42 .1 Postage 4 .29 „3� OLk'Ar 3 GEOTECHNIC L ENGINEERING. STUDY PROPOSED MA UFACTURING BUILDING 1400 MONST R ROAD SOUTHWEST RENTON, WASHINGTON. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 PREPARED FOR SCHOBER, INC. KristinaVI. Ellings .E.Staff Engin er .ty Gov WAsyl4' (/ 41 ti 0 jrs O)se SiONAL G • [EXPIRES till Iy`4,13 1 Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of eotechnical Services • Earth Consultants, Inc. • 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 Ititv LOPMENT PI_ANNING • CITY OF RENTON DEC 21. 1999 FEC VED '��r. JU,� Earth Consultants Inc. / i1Pçyj Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists April 10, 1997 E-6715-1 Schober, Inc. 1400 Monster Road Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Dennis Schober Dear Mr. Schober: We are pleased to submit our report titl-d "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Manufacturing Building, 1400 Monster Ro4I Southwest, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our November 5, 1996 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed manufacturing building can be constructed generally planned, provided the building area fill is allowed to act as a preload prior to construction. After successful completion of the preload, building support can be provided using a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on at least two feet of structural fill. Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on at the structural fill used to raise building area grades. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. • Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS,.INC. *(-4' Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services KME/SDD/KRC/kml 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 • Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)74-608-60 Tacoma(206)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-6715-1 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 3 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 0 4 General 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 5 Preload Program 6 Preload Fill 6 Preload Monitoring 7 Mitigation of Settlement in Existing Building 8 Foundations 8 Pipe Pile Foundations and Underpinning 9 Pile Installation Monitoring 10 Retaining and Foundation Walls 10 Slab-on-Grade Floors 11 Seismic Design Considerations 0 11 Ground Rupture 11 Liquefaction 11 Ground Motion Response 12 Excavations and Slopes 12 Site Drainage 13 Utility Support and Backfill • 13 Pavement Areas 14 LIMITATIONS 15 Additional Services 15 • Earth C•nsultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-6715-1 APPENDICES • Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location Plan Plate 3 Cross-Section A-A' Plate 4 Settlement Plate Detail Plate 5 Culver l Placement Detail Plate 6 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 7 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A7 Boring .ogs Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Plate B2 Atterberg Limits Tests Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 � , GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MANUFACTURING BUILDING 1400 MONSTE ROAD SOUTHWEST RENTON, WASHINGTON E-6715-1. INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Manufacturing Building, 1400 Monster Road Southwest, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and based on the conditions encountered tb develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. Project Description We understand it is planned to develop the site with a 27,680 square foot building. The proposed building will be one story in height with a two-story office area planned for the east portion of the building. At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building location, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up panel construction. Based on our experience with this type of construction, we anticipate wall loads will be in the range of three (3) to four (4) kips per lineal foot, column loads will be on the order of eighty (80) to one hundred (100) • kips, and slab-on-grade loads will be about two hundred fifty (250) pounds per square foot (psf). . The proposed building will contain a lamination press: The press will have an estimated dead load of.ninety (90) tons and will be supported on four legs. The press will occupy a footprint of about nine (9) by thirteen (13) feet and will be set in a pit about eight (8) feet below the finished floor elevation. . A dock-high floor is planned.. In order to achieve floor subgrade elevations, four to six feet of structural fill will need to be placed. Parking and drive areas will be at or near existing grades. - . Earth Consultants, Inc. - ' GEbTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 2 The building will be surrounded by asphalt-moved parking and driveway areas. We anticipate vehicle traffic will consist of passenger vehicles and semi-truck traffic. If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface , The subject site is located at 1400 Monster Road Southwest (see Plate 1 , Vicinity Map). The property is approximately triangular in shape, extending about 400 feet in the east-west direction and 520 feet in the north-south d;rection. The site is bordered on the northeast by • Southwest Jackson Street, northwest by Monster Road Southwest, southwest by Southwest 16th Street and the south by a vacant lot land an elevated overpass for Grady Way. The site topography is near flat with eleva ions ranging from twenty-four (24) to twenty-six (26) feet. The east portion of the site is occupied by he existing Schober Manufacturing facility. The new building will connect to the existing b ilding by way of two walkways. The site is lightly vegetated. Most of th building area is gravel or dirt .with little or no vegetation. A few trees were located o the west side of the site but they have been removed. Subsurface ' Subsurface conditions were evaluated by rilling three borings at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2.. Please refer to the Boring Logs, Plates A2 through A4, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods_ is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Our borings indicate the site is immediate! underlain by a two-inch thick layer of topsoil in some areas: This soil unit is characterized by its brown to black color and the presence of organic material. This soil layer is not considered suitable for use in support of foundations, slabs-on-grade, or pavements. In addition, it is not suitable for use as a structural fill, nor should it be mixed with any material to be used as structural fill. , Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 3 We encountered three to four feet of fill ov:r most of the site. The fill consisted of brown silty fine sand with gravel (Unified Classificat on SM) and concrete rubble. This soil unit may be suitable for support of slab-on-grade floo s and pavements, provided it is compacted in- place as discussed in a following section of this report. The native soil consisted of interbedded layers of loose to medium dense silty sand and soft silt in Borings B-1 and B-2 underlain by dense gray poorly-graded sand at approximately twenty-two (22) feet below the ground surfface. The subsurface conditions in Boring B-3 consisted of medium dense silty sand underlain by dense gray poorly-graded sand at twenty-two (22) feet below the ground surface. Groundwater Groundwater levels observed while drilling range from approximately thirteen (13) to fifteen (15) feet below the existing ground surface and are shown on the boring logs. The contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter month's (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on severEl representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits tests on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. ' In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period pf fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. Earth Consultants, Inc. 7 ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General • Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be developed generally as planned. Building support can be provided using a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system provided the dock-high fill is allowed to act as a preload. The preload program should consist of placir1g fill within the building area to the finished floor elevation and then allowing the settlement ¶aused by the weight of the fill to occur prior to construction. We estimate about six inches of settlement will be induced by the preload in a six to eight week period. The purpose of the preload program is to reduce the amount of estimated post-construction settlement from the static building loads. Based on our analysis, the estimated total post-construction building settlements will be about one and one-half inches. We understand a portion of the preload fill will extend up to the existing Schober building. This will induce settlement in the existing building. In order to minimize the settlement, it may be desirable to underpin the existing building with pin piles, or bury large diameter corrugated metal pipes in the dock-high fill near the existing building to reduce the fill weight. After successful completion of the preload program, building support can be provided using a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system. Foundation elements should be supported on a minimum of two feet of structural fill. This will require overexcavating the foundation bearing soils at least two feet below foundation subgrade elevations and replacing the overexcavated soil -with structural fil . The concrete slab-on-grade floor should be supported on at least one foot of structura fill. The proposed building will contain relatively heavy equipment. Where this equipment cannot be supported on conventional foundations br the slab-on-grade floor, it may be necessary to use a pile foundation. We have included recommendations for four-inch diameter pipe piles. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Schober, Inc. and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or.implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Earth Consultants, Inc. GE'OTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 5 Site Preparation and General Earthwork We understand earthwork operations will consist of raising grades about four to six feet, preloading the building area, overexcavating for foundations, installing underground utilities and grading pavement areas. The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic matter and other deleterious material. If more than two feet of fill will be used to raise site grades, the existing light vegetation and topsoil layer may be left in place. . In areas where less than two feet of structural fill will be placed, the topsoil should be stripped and removed. Blackberries and other dense brush covering the site should be stripped and removed in all fill areas. The existing septic tank, drain fields and utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation . and stability problems. Based on the thickness of the fill being used to achieve construction subgrade elevations, we do not anticipate stripping will be required over most of the site. However, localized areas of stripping may be necessary in parking and driveway areas where fills may be thinner. Based on the thickness of the topsoil layer enco1untered at our boring locations, we estimate a stripping depth of four to six inches. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. . Current plans indicate that to achieve design floor subgrade elevations fills of four to six feet will be required. The ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may be necessary in order to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structral fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 6 During dry weather, most soils which are compatible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the on-site soils at the time of our exploration appear to over the optimum moisture content and would not be suitable for use in their present condition as structural fill. Laboratory testing indicates the native soils have between 44 and 99 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Soil with fines in this range will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. It may be possible to use the native soil as structural fill, provided grading is performed during dry weather and the native soil moisture content can be reduced to near-optimum moisture conditions by aerating. If the native soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted then it may be necessary to import a soil which can be compacted. During dry weather, any non-organic. compactible soil with a maximum cobble size of six inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum cobble • • size of six inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Preload Program Our field exploration indicates the site is underlain by loose to medium dense fill overlying interbedded moderately compressible silt and silty sand. The placement of fill on the site will induce settlement in the existing fill and underlying compressible soil layers. Additional settlement will be induced by the building loads. Assuming grade modifications on the order of four to six feet, we estimate primary settlement will be on the order of four to six inches depending on the thickness and characteristics of the consolidating layers. In order to pre-induce this settlement, they building area should be preloaded. The preload program would consist of placing the building area fill to the finished floor elevation. The fill should then allowed to pre-induce the estimated settlement. During this period, the induced settlement would be monitored. When the settlement ceases or the, remaining estimated settlement is considered to be within tolerable limits, the preload is removed and building construction can commence. We estimate the preload will need to be in-place six to eight weeks. We estimate the preload program should reduce the total post-construction settlements to about one and one-half inch. Preload Fill The preload fill material will be used for structural support of the slab and interior footings and should meet the requirements for structural fill. The definition for structural fill can be found in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. Earth Consultants, Inc. • GEbTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 7 • The preload fill should extend at least five feet beyond the building footprint. The side slopes of the preload fill should be inclined at a 1 H 1 V or shallower gradient. Fill for landscaping purposes should not be placed near the building since the additional fill could induce further settlements after the building is constructed. If landscaping fill around the building is planned, the preload should be extended to five feet beyond the planned landscape fill, or a lightweight landscape fill should be used. Preload Monitoring Based on the settlement characteristics of the soils underlying the site, we estimate the preload will need to be in-place about six to eight weeks to induce the anticipated settlement. The actual preload period will be dependent upon settlement readings. If a shorter preload period is needed, a surcharge can be used. We are available to evaluate the surcharge depth and time variation, if necessary. In order to verify the actual amount of settlement, a monitoring program should be performed. The monitoring program should include setting settlement monitors on the existing site subgrade before fill is placed, monitoring them through completion of fill placement, continuing until settlements cease or the remaining estimated settlements are considered within the buildings tolerable limits. Details of this program are presented below: • Settlement monitors should be placed on the existing subgrade before any fill is placed. The settlement monitors should be placed at a rate of one for every 5,000 to 10,000 square feet of building area, with a minimum of four settlement monitors. ECI can supply and install these markers. (A typical detail is provided on Plate 4). • A baseline reading is obtained on each monitor and is referenced to a temporary benchmark located on a feature that will be unaffected by the fill-induced settlements. • The preload fill is then placed. Settlement readings are taken at relatively short intervals during this process, since this phase generates relatively large and rapid settlement. S • Once the fill operation is complete, readings are obtained on a periodic basis, typically weekly, until the settlement ceases or the remaining estimated settlement is judged to be within tolerable limits. Earth Consultants, Inc. GE'OTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 8 The settlement induced by the preload fill should be about four to six inches. A smaller settlement than estimated should be interpr-ted as that the soils have been pre-consolidated and soil conditions are better than anticipate. Conversely, a larger settlement than estimated could be interpreted that the soil conditions are worse than anticipated, and that additional time and measurements should be taken to obtain satisfactory results. ECI should be retained to acquire the settlement readings. If another organization is used to obtain the readings, the measurements should be provided to ECI as quickly after their acquisition as possible for plotting and interpretation. This will help avoid any misinterpretation or misunderstanding regarding the success of the preload program. In order to ensure the accuracy of the settlement readings, the settlement monitors must be maintained. In our experience, earthwork equipment (dozers and trucks) often demolish markers. This adds to the project costs in that they need to be replaced and it makes the . information obtained less reliable. To avoid this, the project specifications should include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace damaged settlement markers and have the settlement readings re-obtained at his own cost. This requirement makes the earthwork contractor more conscious of the importance of the monitoring program and will aid in maintaining the integrity of the program. Mitigation of Settlement in Existing Building The new building will be connected to the existing building by way of two walkways. If grades in the walkways will be raised, the (weight of the fill may induce some settlement in the existing structure. We anticipate this Settlement will be on the order of one to three inches, and could result in damage to the existing structure. There are several options to mitigate the potential for damage to the existing structure. 'One option would be to underpin the existing building using pipe piles as discussed below. Another method would be to bury large diameter empty corrugated metal pipes (CMP) in the dock-high fill onto the existing structure. A standard detail indicating how t e CMP pipes can be used is included as Plate 5. Foundations After the successful completion of the preloal program, it is our opinion the. proposed building can be supported on a conventional spread and continuous 'footing foundation bearing on a • minimum of two feet of structural fill after the preload and settlement program is complete. For frost protection considerations, exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18). inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation e ements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. Earth Coisultants, Inc. . ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 9 With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable bearing capacity of two thousand: five hundred (2,500) psf fors structural fill can be used. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnit de would be provided with a.theoretical factor- of-safety in excess of three against actual hear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. Provided the preload program is successfully completed, and with structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one and one-half inches is anticipated with differential movement of about one inch. Mpst of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the. supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must 'be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of (.35) can be used. For' passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifthI (350) pcf. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1 .5 has' been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive` resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify conditions are as anticipated in this report. Pipe Pile Foundations and Underpinning We understand portions of the building will be subjected to heavy equipment loads. Where these loads cannot be adequately supported on the slab-on-grade floor or spread footings, it may be necessary to use a pile foundation. It may also be desired to underpin the existing Schober building to minimize settlement induced by the fill for the new building. For this application, four-inch diameter pipe piles may be used. The piles should consist of schedule 40 s'teel pipes driven to refusal. Refusal shall be defined as less than one inch of penetration in ten seconds of continuous dri ing at a rate of 1 ,000 blows per minute using an eight hundred fifty (850) pound hammer. Individual piles driven to refusal can be designed for an allowable axial-capacity of twenty (20) kips. No lateral capacity should be assumed for vertical piles. Horizontal loads should be resisted by passive soil pressure acting on the face of bearing portions of the pile caps or grade beams. Earth Consultants, Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 10 Based onT the subsurface conditions encountered at our test pit locations, we anticipate the piles will bear in the medium dense to dense' sand at about twenty-five (25) to thirty (30) feet below grade. The piles are typically provided in manageable lengths of five to ten feet with straight cut ends. As each length is driven into the ground, additional lengths can be added using couplers. Pile Installation Monitoring As it is not possible to observe the completed pile below the ground, judgement and experience must be used as the basis for determining the acceptability of a pile. Therefore, all piles should be installed under the full-timg observation of a representative of ECI. This will allow us to evaluate fully the contractor's peration, collect and interpreted the installation • data, and verify bearing stratum elevations. Furthermore, 'we will also understand the implications of variations from normal procedures with respect to the design criteria. The contractor's equipment and procedures should be reviewed by ECI before the start of construction. We suggest contacting Bill McDowell with McDowell Northwest for a pipe pile installation bid. Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight should be increase to fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that preloads due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other preload loads will not act on the wall. If such preloads are to apply, they should be added to the above design laeral pressure. The passive pressure and friction coefficients previously provided in the foundation section are applicable to retaining walls. In order to reduce the potential for hydrostatic forces building up behind the walls, retaining walls should be backfilled with a suitable free-draining material extending at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. The free-draining backfill should conform.to the WSDOT specification for gravel backfill for walls (WSDOT 9-03.12(2)). A perforated drain pipe should be placed at the base of the wall and should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal foot with three-eighths inch pea gravel. Earth Corsultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 • April 10, 1997 Page 11 Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on structural fill placed to achieve design grades. Disturbed subgrade soil must either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. Slab-on- grade floors should be designed by the structural engineer based on the anticipated loading and the subgrade support characteristics. A modulus of vertical subgrade reaction of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for design. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity; however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the ) 949, 7.1 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area and the ,1965, 6.5 magnitude earthqu ke in the Midway area. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture; liquefaction, and round motion response. Ground Rupture The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) milies. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, 't is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction ' Liquefaction is a phenomenon in'which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in.the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table;, and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Earth Co,sultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 12 It is our opinion the potential for widespreas liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is moderate to low. Isolated areas may be s bject to liquefaction; however, the effect on the planned development is anticipated to be inimal provided the recommendations contained in this report are followed. We estimate liqu faction induced settlement would be in the range of the estimated post-construction settlem nts discussed earlier. Ground Motion Response The UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that site coefficient of S3 = 1 .5 should be used for the static force procedure as outlined in Section 1628 of the 1994 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in Section 1629 of the 1994 UBC, the curve for soft to medium stiff clays and sands (Soil Type 3) should be used for Figure 3, Normslized Response Spectra Shapes. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the native soils would be classified as Type C by OSHA. Temporary cuts •greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1 .5H:1 V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1 V. All cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncon rolled over the top of any slopes. Permanently exposed slopes should be see ed with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 13 Site Drainage Groundwater seepage was observed in our Borings at thirteen (13) to fifteen (15) feet below grade. Since building area grades are to be raised about four to six eight feet, we do not expect the site groundwater levels will present major construction-related problems. However, utility line excavations may encounter groundwater. If perched seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam excavations during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. [depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during grading operations by ECI's representative at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. Loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of two percent. Footing drains should be installed around the building perimeter in areas where pavements will not abut the building edge,at or_just below the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 6. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain. system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill The site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. However, the loose condition of some of the soils and the potential for a relatively high groundwater table may result in de-stabilizing of the trench bottom as the trench is excavated. Where loose soils or heavy groundwater seepage is encountered, remedial measures such as overexcavating soft soils or tamping quarry spells into the trench bottom may be required. In addition, caving of trench walls should be anticipated where the trenches encounter groundwater. Earth Consultants, Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc. E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 14 Utility trench.backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haun hes. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above th- crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remain.er of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twell e inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction r;equirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 7. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a'properly prepared subgrade fo pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557-78). It is possible that localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or . • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thick r sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for truck- trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four,and one-half inches of ATB. We will be pleased to assist in developing appropriate pavement sections for heavy traffic zones, if needed. Pavement materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. The use of a Class B asphalt mix is suggested. . Earth Consultants, Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Schober, Inc.' E-6715-1 April 10, 1997 Page 15 LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyse , the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the professi n currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or imp ied: The recommendations submitted in this re ort are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions be ween borings may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final ' design and specifications too verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interdreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geot chnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concept , specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface corilditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. i i i \ ' ST ' ,,j a�S�'12�9TH PL" J 1z9IH ST .< "Y = S ca''',LANGSTON P. igiriVr, ,Fr 4.dv. '`~�$ 4/I S 1 -ND s crBU-iSR! l zv �ry� S 133RD s 13zno ST 8 O A(,` t /V sr s.17,. ' ' -' ' 11% r, y G 4 4 t - G J ,s 5TH sr s '1. f>a�e r j -FOSTER „.,.....1�\ 1 9 / I UN jo 13 EL shtiL� s,v sT <4 p/,n GOLF. .:.���!� T 5_�(138 H �f!ST 9011 t. 139TH ' V-.e11 � ;�•- lt. am, ---- ..,, ` ,;SAS^ q.:..�� y . �� T Y� `p-�a. TJIB ' !\42 D_ST \ II s ���`%H 142 , e ..\\� S / "rfjm*_i• :-3 1 N FOSTER rMID \, sr. 1", '3Rp • 'k r/ %`x `�- ! '�� 3a� I \` a a Fz ►5 144 ,.1:36r. t k.. T�N ' 1 '� Q1i "°'i HAZELNUT a ST ' �'-``:\ AAA((((�iii ST •1 :r- PARR In :y,••^:l •\ a 9 4. Eft'�Y' � 1 _,11 LIB <7. ; o•r\--:` ,z, (ate _ 4 iciaujiM S 14 �L FS t FORT\ �� o A • s > ii'� 60T ` Y';DFJYT�??. ;`` 'm° v 4200 . ~u < I1`: 5 1491N - 9G \ �.... PAkKS::f"+,. e <. S 1 9TH ST � TH 5�;97H `" U, r _ L'".`` \\�\ � NTO N ST .1.,,, S 150TH ST0 9>H - T 22 r' < "1ST Sr \':� PL a ssi \ 24 S '1szNo ST 23 :. - �V1� y Ht DY �, 1 1� T i5r �� �� \, '`' Goo ......1 ''' i 1`\ s 5 152ND P 1c < S 4a� \s SIB --I; \, ' o� S 153R0 .NS F, j� o S 156 11 ST \�\��� fit,' \ 'CeN�:. �-�`�s N FR y ... -4- .5M: s 8 g,„ v ,sue,:. ,,,,,IL, , UkWI. .� Ny 1 . . ,, \ RI �. ST SP H•.:P,�'„ gs°9si.i i? Si CENTER ?KW( • o I s £'f8A Y .41111% EYANS auaj03 i SUI 5 < < 1ST tI L u Z S :,,m Sr •O: BAKER c e An : ?, r`. F'�- • '' l� i�tlSF7l7� ., , J r. s154��� _ ;� STRANGER BL4D �ar�` � •' WI= g CC N � R NTON ~ i,n C stow, FMER TRECK IND(�J ' 26 °R N CT I 0 ' TS S 1•: CDJRTYA'.,sr maw. ( ,-, / I I Z5 0 Reference: King County/Map 655 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1997 .PPP" '4%.. 441.\ Vicinity Map �� iirw1.01 Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building Geotedinical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6715-t ;I Drwn. GLS I Date Mar.'97. Checked . KME !Date 3/10/97 I Plate .1 1 Reference: Preliminary Site Plan File No. 96-058 I\ By POE Engineering, Inc. Dated Dec. 1996 �• S,I v'9 Q Detention ck. �0 Pond Area CEO O I I --1 I I ------ I 1 1 1 I 1 1 . ,1 T 1 A' 1 L__ _ _1 B-3� I B-2 i • 1 6-1/ 1 (.5, 0 . LEGEND B-1 -i - Approximate Location of ECI Boring, Proj. No. ��1 E-6715-1, Feb. 1997 1---i Scale I I Existing Building --- I 0 50 100 200ft. U Proposed Building A A' Cross Section Line 4 J (See Plate 3) • ������ p1: ���►� Boring Location Plan 11 ' $i'f Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building will/ w�tr`j Gevech,1oa, . &E,vi�,.,,enta, , Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6715-1 I Drwn. GLS 1 Date Mar•'97 Checked KME I Date 3/10/97 I Plate 2 A A' 35 - - 35 B-1 B-3 25 - Brown -25 I I 21 2 w _ W 1 12 - w U. u_ z 2 I 12 z Q15 - 11 -15 0 W 6 9 W J J • W r W 4 18 5 - - - - 5 i 1 23 48 44 -5 - -5 NOTE: The stratification lin s approximate bounder ie may be either more gr, our interpretation of thi individual boring locatic= cannot be responsible.120ft. Cross Section A - A' Schober Building Renton, Washington . hecked KME I Date 3/17/97 I Plate 3 i SCHEMATIC 0 LY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONST UCTION DRAWING surcharge or Preload hr Surcharge e orPreload Fill Fi ll :ij::: • .. ii] :i:i•li.i i11-111=.111 I LJ t ill=-11I=III= =111 .111 E STANDARD NOTES • 1) Base consists of 3/4 inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with center drilled 5/8 inch diameter hole. 2) Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand. 3) Marker rod is 1/2 inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends. 4) Marker rod is attached to base by nut and washer on each'side of base. 5) Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2 inch diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is NOT attached to rod or base. 6) Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded couplings. 7) Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-fit plastic couplings. . 8) Steel marker rod should extend at least 6 inches above top of plastic sleeve. 9) Marker should'extend at least 2 feet above top of fill surface. IP!; '4�>t� •14\ TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL 1� Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building I/� 1111'\� Gtd/C31 Engineers.GeobglstS&Environmental SclenhlSts Renton, Washington • Proj. No. 6715-1 I Drwn. GLS IDate Mar.'97 Checked KME ]Date 3/17/97 Il' te 4 I • • Extend Thickened Existing Structural Separation Slab Into Fill Slab Except At Wall Openings f Proposed Slab Addition j/ /. I D e e p: _.,a a .p •e: e ! �' S d d .,:..,. .:,....c.:..V___ _ .;..I 4' Minimum Base Existing Dock-High Fill Proposed + -I- 1 Dock-High 36' CMP 36' CMP 1 Fill Culvert Culvert 4. ... . ... .. :::.-:::1::::il::;:::::;::: :::Ti:i.,.: Existing Grade I11=111=1u1 : ; E(l,El;,:L- ;�:: :....:....f :.::... I 11r=lll flu _ r ^1;1= 111— 2' Sand Bed Fill All Voids III With Sand Or Lightweight Material • SCHEMATIC ONLY- NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING • • ,p,\ 'ik A CULVERT PLACEMENT DETAIL �� t: Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building �fli N. ,�tt GrucectirkalE, .GeoloOsts" Renton, Washington Proj. No.• 6715-1 I Drwn. GLS I Date Mar.'97 1 Checked KME Iite 3/17/97 I Plate 5 o o / : - £ an 0 • - �o `iir": C i:v'r,. - °o � inch m•n. _ •t O .O 6 c 0 eo O 6 0 • 0 •o ":a o •,- •o . .... • ••i0•''.•▪ • •• •-_ . .� - ° :: • ••• .0 • % . .a�:::•a:••c. . ° 18 inch min. 'M o J.•, . - •'. • • .o • • 4 inch min. ; °'-. e o 0 °_ • Diameter '• • •,'•• l ° . •° _o - ° o°, o . ° Perforated Pipe • •........ a e- o o°ea 0 o o ° e Wrapped in Drainage ' '" -.•�" . o . o e o o' a o o Go°a :o ° o Fabric •�.a ife;: :' °"••-^ae - ° ` f 2 inch min. 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch ---..- min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONST 'UCTION DRAWING LEGEND .g. '%•0!::: '. Surface seal; native soil o other low permeability material. Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the ° WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight joi ted;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Dp not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. • d„P, 'iit: 441\ TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL Cs� ]IJyI{$?fr Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building \III/�ifI i l Geote dv,kal Engineers.Geologists O Environmental Sck„lkt5 Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6715-1 IDrwn. GLS I Date Mar.'97 Checked KME I Date 3/17/97 I Plate 6 i -T. . Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas , Roadway Areas o 0 Varies ° 0 ° 95 0 O 0 85� 5•• 1 Foot Minim um • Backfill ,• • Varies i _ A `10- o(fo.',wb°U PIPE Io.'.:o"':O0.U. 1 •0° 4.• °e.oUp.• ••o�'°'.Q.�O ( 0:0•000o .9;• !b.do0.O• �•0 Bedding Qo°0°:.0,Door. :'oo o,. ooQoa'C Varies '0. •'o o•::°''0 0 0;.. 0•.9O' 0.0 o.o•.o.o. $ '°DO••o°oo Oo!�g.°o0•. .0.0• �Q • QoeQ•oc o Qb.O.• O. Oo 00•° O. .00°. �• • Q•° - 7 vR�ro°,.°•8SQ�n•Orio?p .Q•d%„Oa•ob a,°O LEGEND: •.'": Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab R rr: ..ai•�.:a .> 0° 0 G0•• • ° 0 ° °°0.' Base Material or Base Rock • ;v,;,; ; .;; Backfill; Compacted Onr Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described i the Site Preparation of the General '.. Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage o Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Vest Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Spec'fied in the Attached Report Text. �:•...o°y°.,:t Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and 5Q.Z9 p; Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. /p,.; p.. \ TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL q1§4/ki-10d� ,�* Earth�,^�i�,�Consulb�r"'tant"" "'x""In . Schober Building^ �°'°, 'S Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6715-1 I Drwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME I Date 3/17/97 I Plate 7 • APPEINDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-6715-1 Our field exploration was performed on February 27, 1997. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three borings to a maximum depth of thirty.one and one half (31 .5) feet below the existing grade. The borings were drilled by Associated Drilling subcontracted to ECI, using hollow stem auger drilling equipment. Approximate boring locations were determined by taping and pacing from existing features. Approximate boring elevations were determined by locating the boring on the site topography plan. The locations and elevations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed piertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Sol Classification System which is presented on Plate Al , Legend. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of the borings are presented on Plates A2 through A4. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs epresent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. The borings were drilled using hollow stem augers. We attempted to control heave by maintaining a head of water in the augers. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D- 1586. The split spoon samples were driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. These results are recorded on the boring logs at the appropriate sample depths. Earth Consultants, Inc. • • MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL t] O c GW Weil-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Gravel a o Q 'Q ° gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines 'And Clean Gravels n n n Gravelly (little or no fines) ffi. r Coarse •Soils GP Poorly Graded Gravels,Gravel- Grained i I � I � (I. gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Soils More Than 1�i GM Silty Gravels,Gravel Sand 50% Coarse Gravels With i gm Silt Mixtures ' Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) , GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- . No. 4 Sieve It gc Clay Mixtures Sand • - oe 'o SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly 'And Clean Sand o 4Q ' o SW' Sands, Little Or No Fines 'Sandy (little or no fines) ,...; .:+,)j-.'�;,;•�/+ More Than """::.. :%y: y:: SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly Soils <t':%;::.:, h 50% Material •%:;:;,F;;:Q*":::f...::: Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve Coarse ' SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Sands With Sm Passing No.4 Fines(appreciable ;:, • Sieve amount of fines) ,��� SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FlourSilty- • rpl Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit /IA CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean • Soils Clays I II I 1 OL Organic Silts And Organic !I I I!I I I I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire More Than mh Sand Or Silty 'Soils 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller Tran And CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size ' / / OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts -' IL/. 1! .1 pi- Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils 0/ `I/ ` 7 pt With High Organic Contents ' Topsoil /y�'4,4/ Humus And Duff Layer sl Fill •�•�•�•�•��• Hlyhly Variable Constituents 'The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. • DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C TOAVANE READING,tsf I 2'O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight . II 24"I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P • SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. , LL LIQUID LIMIT, % SL DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX • DURING EXCAVATION t SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE r�'' A Earth Consultants Inc. LEGEND •,1I! �i ! C4,oita MR al linginrcrs.(k kigLsis&tiitvirodmx7u.,i$rx:uibis Proj. No.6715-4 Date Mar. '97 Ite Al B6ring Log Project Name: Sheet of Schober Building 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6715-1 KME 2/27/97 2/27/97 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ±26' D Monitoring Well Piezometer al Abandoned,sealed with bentonite 0 _ No. o cn ; Surface Coinditions: _a Blows CIE C14- E OE (%) Ft co CO CI V) 0 • SM F1LL: BrOwn silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist . • 2 3 — 45.2 g • -wood fibers : 4 SM Gray silt SAND, loose, moist 5 . 38.0 2 ML Brown sandy SILT, soft, moist 6 7 - • 52.7 1 8ML Brown SILT,very soft,wet • 9 LL=45 PL=32 Pl=13 10 50.0 2 -99%fines • 12 13 14 - V 15 319 6 16 777 SM Gray silt SAND, loose,wet ML Gray SILT, medium stiff,wet 17 — SM Gray siltY fine SAND, loose,wet • • .4! 18 — • \ • Or.i. • 41411. Boring Log 1-4111.14 Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building P1/ NI; Geolechr&cal Englneez&GeologistS&Enviicrimergai Scientist; Renton,Washington ID Proj.No. 6715-1 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME Date 3/10/97 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Baring Log Project Name: . Sheet o Sc ob rBUdng 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: • Completion Date: Boring No.: 6715-1 KME 2/27/97 2/27/97 B-i Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: S Sampling Method: Associated HSA SP Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ±26' El Monitoring Well ❑ Piez_t NI Abandoned,sealed with bento Ae w No. j Q f ° cn Q �7 eo■ a 2 k -2Ft0 _ SM Gr ay G d�fn SAND with lenses of gray silt and dark brown organic 80.6 4 \\ \ 2 silt,loose,wet _• SP Gray poorly graded SAND, medium dense,water bearing 22 ��ƒ 2 — . .• \ $ 24 gr•W: . 2 27.4 2 t+. 2 Mk: 27 • a40/ 28 3 — . 3 �aa 44 � -becomes dense 1 Boring terminated at 31.5 feet belowe existing grade. Groundwater mueedoum£ed at15.0 feet during drilling. • • - x . . N . /K • Boring Log ro' Earth Consultants Inc.' Renton, ShbrBumMg uk � Scientists ' • Re mat Washington . Proj.No. 6715-1 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME Date 3/10/97 Plate A3 co Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations a the tme and location«this exp� moryhole,mdfkbyengineering tests, analysis and judgme 4 They a not necessarily representative of othothertime and locations.We cannot accept respnbtyf the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • • " Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Schober Building 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6715-1 KME 2/27/97 2/27/97 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ±26' ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite • W No. - •. ® N o Surface Conditions: Blows a E a t E N E %j It M ? m L A 33 00 a •V7 ti • •���i SM FILL:Brown silty SAND with gravel, brick and concrete pieces, medium dense, moist . 21.6 8 *s*•*j 4 ML Brown SILT with fine sand, soft, moist • 5 -94%fines 40.9 3 • 6 7 MH Brown elastic SILT, soft, moist 49.4 3 8 9 10 • LL=52 PL=33 45.9 3 PI=19 . 11 • 12 • • 38.3 13 E. { 14 SM Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense,wet 15 — 36.9 13 • ---r- 16 17 — r< 18 • n 19 — r (t.`.;) •p• 4.411, Boring Log Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building. Renton,Washington Proj.No. 6715-1 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME Date 3/10/97 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, •• analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • Boring Log ' . • Project Name: ' • Sheet of Sc ob rBUding . . 2 2 Job No. . Logged by Start Date: . Completion Date: Boring No.: 6 15 1 KME . 2 2%7 2 2%7 • B-2 Drilling Contactor: DrillingMe■od: Sampling Method: • Associated. HSA • SPT Ground Surface Elevation Hole Completion: • ±2' CI Monitoring Well ❑ Pzmt N Abandoned,sealed with bento Ae w No. / o fa. " © . �% �w aka4- S § k • ' R Lama 0 w . q\j! _ SM Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense,wet 63.8 4 2 ML Brown SILT, soft,wet • . MU 2. SR Gryporlygraded SAND, meiumdes,wBebeaEn� g . \ . . ) • 2 — , { ' 24 . ifeki \ 7 2 . . �o & § 7 2 . . . / r 27 . • . A ^ : J , 29 — . ' W ' . . / 3 -becomes dense 24 3 34 M{ . Born terminated at 31.5 feet below eisin grade. Groundwater > . table e countered at 13.5 feet during drilling. . • • N . .. \ . n (0.!';, � %� !1v . Boring Log a Earth Consultants Inc. Sc oberBUding Imp �/�r a. _ § . . Renton,Washington -I Proj.No. 67 15-1 Dwn. GLS DateMar'7 Checked KME . Date 3/10 9 _ Plate A5 co Subsurface cond m depicted m represent 2roserva observations !db�i of»■e Uaryholemdlk b engineering t& ma�sand judgmk. e are not necessarily representative We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Schober Building 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6715-1 KME 2/27/97 2/27/97 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ±25' ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite U No. — o .c ! ti c Surface Conditions: BIOWS a E a t E to E (%) Ft. M ] a lt. A M 2 O N G N SM FILL:Bro4vn silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist — 2 18.4 21 3 SM Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense, moist • • =• 4 5 15.2 7 6 7 20.8 12 8 -44%fines 9 10 17.7 12 11 12 — 25.6 11 13 _ -becomes wet 14 15 31.0 g 16 17 — SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense,wet 18 — r 19 — n /IT� pay. ,011, Boring Log � ,1 Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building UP lig NuF Geoiectinkal Engineer&GeologIsts i Envitoruncritai Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 6715-1 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME Date 3/10/97 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Schober Building • 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6715-1 KME 2/27/97 2/27/97 B-3 Drilling Contactor: , Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT • Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: t25' ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Plezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite O I — W • No. t o — Blows a E a + E m E (%) Ft, E E u. m M 71 • VI O CA Vl SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 26.2 18 21 — �» SP Gray poorly graded SAND with trace of gravel,dense, moist oE:iea 22 <l X:}?iQ 23 G7 ate 24 a;::::' • 25 :o•r"i:9�'•' cJ 12.2 48• 26 • Boring terminated at 26.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 13.0 feet during drilling. • • • • n U • at: A(,��• Boring Log u� b p `all Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building `th/ liff Vigil Geolixhnical Engbeer& Geologists '`Rovitontotzsai ScientistsRenton,Washington • coProj.No. 6715-1 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'97 Checked KME Date 3/10/97 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-6715-1 Earth Consultants, Inc. I .0 mmer.Y•mor b , PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT a I C C C C C 0 O 0 O 0 C C e- N (.) C In co N CO 6) -I r- L00' - L00' I i I 2 ZOO' ZOO' ,)a 3 "£00' c• o O CO. I COO' I py O O O 2 b0O' I vo0' g.0 Ln �r N - 900' 900' ti N 800' i 800' Z LO _ L0' IL Z . Q I cc ZO' Zo' CO' £0' 00Z t d .- ❑ _80 r t1' .,❑ ,,.., •• c 'Lid OOL 09 II •' 1• - Z'w LL N 09;sr . . E' w Cr4 i -- -.. 0 OE11' _ 9'Z E Q 3 OZ1 -- 8 N y cn - L ❑ 9`�� z_ a a 1 Q — CO CO U) • • 0y 0 ZCD cc 3 3 — g Q ❑ O 0 O - q 0 pa (17 co t7 — 9. 4/L - 8 IllZ z Cl) a �E - 0L tt . ort ,di, j F-•=s O In t1) e — oZ illcc o 1. r CC 6 ` • - 04 Q O Z rl N rh 0 C O co co co - 09 O 8 _ ) .3 - 08 cc E'm - 00 L rn •W J >- I • Cl tu . - ooz 0 Y I . c.) 0 4 ❑ 00E co N COf)C U C C M N 0 0)) r• PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT • . 441 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES Earth Consultants Inc. Schober Building GeolechnIcal Engineers.Geologtsis&Environmental Sdennsis B2 Renton, Washington • 3715-1 {Drwn. GLS Date Mar. '97 1 Checked KME I Date 3/10/97 I Plate B1 1 p 100 80 x 60 w z }1-- 40 A-Line a. 20 • • CL-ML Qec 0 20. 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT Natural Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classificatio USCS L.L. P.L. PI. Water Test Pit (ft) Content • B-1 7.5 Brown SILT - ML 45 32 13 45.8 A B-2 10 Brown elastic SILT MH 52 33 19 52.3 Atterberg Limits Test Data ��1: �AI� Schober Building . Earth Consultants Inc Renton, Washington *)4/ 11/J\1r�1 Geoiethnkal Engineers.Geologists&E�n,nr«tmental Sdenttsts Proj. No.6715-11 Date Mar. '97 I Plate . B2 DISTRIBUTION E-6715-1 4 Copies Poe Engineering 400 West Gowe Street, Suite 310 Ke' t, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Alan Poe 2 Copies Schober, Inc. 1460 Monster Road Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Dennis Schober Earth Consultants, Inc.