HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 08/01/2005AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
August 1, 2005
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE INITIATOR:
Querin II Annexation - 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for 7.3 acres located in the vicinity of
Hoquiam Ave. NE, SE 112th St., and SE 114th Pl.
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
Falk II Annexation - 50% Notice of Intent to annex petition for 6.4 acres located in the vicinity of
102nd Ave. SE and S. 50th St.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of July 18, 2005. Council concur.
b. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appoints Jimmy Cho, 241 Factory St. N., Renton, 98055, and Robert
Bonner, 91 Williams Ave. S., Renton, 98055, each to the Planning Commission for a three-year
term expiring 6/30/2007. Refer to Community Services Committee.
c. Administrative, Judicial and Legal Services Department recommends confirmation of the
appointment of Michael Bailey as the new Finance and Information Services Administrator,
effective 9/1/2005; and approval of his salary at Step E of the salary range. Council concur.
d. City Clerk reports bid opening on 7/20/2005 for CAG-05-098, five bids; engineer's estimate
$842,287; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Sanders
General Construction, in the amount of $972,213. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
for discussion of funding.
e. City Clerk submits annual Washington State Department of Transportation certification of State
Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns as of 7/1/2005 (required by
RCW 47.24.010). Information.
f. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional
right-of-way along the frontage of Duvall Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the Fotheringill
Short Plat (SHP-04-134). Council concur.
g. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60% Notice
of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Akers Annexation and recommends a public hearing
be held on 8/15/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 13.3 acres located south of Puget
Sound Dr. and east of 108th Ave. SE, if extended. Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
h. Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-05-008, Lake Washington Blvd. Slip Plane; and
requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of
$121,837.47, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $22,384.32
to Northwest Cascade, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
i. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with KPG, Inc. in the
amount of $115,639.07 for design engineering services for the Rainier Ave. S. and Hardie Ave.
SW Improvement projects, Phase I. Approval is also sought to transfer funds totaling $200,000
from the NE 4th St. and Hoquiam Ave. NE project and the Transit Center Video project to these
projects. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
j. Utilities Systems Division reports submittal of the appraisal performed for the vacation of
portions of Bremerton Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-007; Liberty Ridge LLC,
petitioner), and requests that Council accept the appraisal and set compensation for the right-of-
way at $5,170. Council concur.
8. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter from Glenn Davis, Managing Partner, BDJS Associates, LLC, 1900 West Nickerson, PMB
116-168, Seattle, 98119, requesting reimbursement in the amount of $51,264.24 for utilities
oversizing along Olympia Ave. NE for the Urban Crafts development. Refer to Utilities
Committee.
b. Letter from Evan Chan, Project Manager, N&C Investments LLC, 7432 SE 27th St., Mercer
Island, 98040, requesting waiver of the development and mitigation fees for the Morris Avenue
Townhomes development located at 513 S. 2nd St. Refer to Finance Committee.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Community Development Block Grant Program Agreement
with King County
b. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Financial Management Policies
c. Planning & Development Committee: City of Renton Portion of NE 4th St. Vacation
Compensation
d. Public Safety Committee: Valley Special Response Team Interlocal Agreement Addendum
e. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program*
10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
2006-2011 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (see 9.e.)
Ordinance for first reading:
Allowing road closures of one day or less to be governed by administrative action (Council approved
7/18/2005)
Ordinance for second and final reading:
Multi -family housing property tax exemption modifications (I" reading 6/27/2005)
11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
12. AUDIENCE COMMENT
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION (litigation)
14. ADJOURNMENT
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room
6:30 p.m.
Emerging Issues
Council Chambers
Approximately 7:00 p.m.
2nd Quarter Financial Report
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
August 1, 2005
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30`p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS
NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant
ATTENDANCE
to the CAO; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE
WALTON, City Clerk; SANDRA MEYER, Transportation Systems Director;
ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON,
Senior Planner; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, Police Department.
PUBLIC MEETING
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Querin 11,
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Hoquiam Ave NE
public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent petition for the proposed
Querin H Annexation; 7.3 acres located between Hoquiam Ave. NE on the west
and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east, south of SE 112th St.
Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that this annexation was originally
submitted for 10.14 acres, and the applicant was unable to obtain the signatures
for the 60% petition. Therefore, the annexation was resubmitted for 7.3 acres.
Mr. Erickson stated that the subject annexation site contains three existing
single-family dwellings and three vacant parcels. The topography of the
western portion of the site is relatively flat, whereas the eastern portion
contains steep slopes as a result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that
King County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 flow control
standards or greater are recommended at the time of development.
Reviewing the public services, Mr. Erickson reported that the site is served by
Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Renton School
District. He pointed out that the site is currently zoned R-4 (four dwelling units
per gross acre) in King County, and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates
the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per
net acre) zoning is proposed. Mr. Erickson reviewed the fiscal impact of the
proposed annexation, indicating a surplus of $236 at current development and a
surplus of $9,278 at full development. He noted the estimated one-time parks
acquisition and development cost of $27,176.
Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with
City policies and relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. He concluded
that the annexation appears to further City business goals and is in the best
interests of the City.
Public comment was invited.
Martin Kenney, 18719 Yew Way, Snohomish, 98296, stated that he owns
property within the annexation area, and noted the successful development to
the south of the annexation site. Pointing out that Renton is a progressive city,
Mr. Kenney complimented the City's planning staff for their responsiveness.
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 270
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
QUERIN II 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION, AND
AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% DIRECT PETITION TO
ANNEX REQUIRING THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING CONSISTENT
WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE
CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Falk II, 102nd accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Ave SE & S 50th St public hearing to consider the 50150 Direct Petition to annex for the proposed
Falk II Annexation, which consists of 6.4 acres, including the abutting 102nd
Ave. SE right-of-way, located west of 102nd Ave. SE and south of SE 185th
Pl., if extended.
Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the subject annexation site was
originally part of larger annexation that was split into two pieces (the 6.3-acre
Falk Annexation was approved in December 2003). He reported that the site
contains five single-family dwellings, and is essentially flat with steeper slopes
on the western side. Public services are provided by Fire District #40, Soos
Creek Water and Sewer District, and Renton School District. Mr. Erickson
noted that roadway and stormwater improvements are likely.
Continuing, Mr. Erickson reported that existing King County zoning for the site
is R4 (four dwelling units per gross acre). The Renton Comprehensive Plan
designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling
units per net acre) is recommended. He pointed out that the R-8 zoning is
compatible with King County's R-6 (six dwelling units per gross acre) zoning to
the east of the site.
Mr. Erickson stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of
$12,715 at full development, and an estimated one-time parks acquisition and
development cost of $22,381. Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed
annexation is generally consistent with City policies and Boundary Review
Board criteria. He noted that the 50150 Direct Petition annexation method is
not used very often, but is a valid method. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler
emphasized that the applicant made the determination to use this method, not
the City.
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding access to the
annexation site from the north, Mr. Erickson explained that the topography of
the area to the north of the subject annexation is limiting as two major ravines
transverse the property.
Public comment was invited.
Correspondence was read from Joseph and Martha MacKenzie, 18533 102nd
Ave. SE, Renton, 98055, expressing the following concerns regarding the
construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site: property line dispute; the
removal of trees; flying debris from the wood grinder; the moving, compression
and leveling of dirt; the noise; and the dust. The MacKenzies questioned who
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 271
is liable for any damage to their house due to the vibrations, and they expressed
unhappiness that construction will continue if the Falk II Annexation is
approved.
Joseph MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE, Renton, 98055, expanded on his
concerns regarding the construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site as
stated in the previously read correspondence. Responding to the Mayor's
inquiry, Mr. MacKenzie expressed his opposition to the proposed Falk II
Annexation due to the construction.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that City staff will investigate the
MacKenzies' concerns regarding the construction related issues.
Robert McIntosh, 10104 SE 187th St., Renton, 98055, stated that he lives
adjacent to the southern boundary of the annexation area, and when
construction begins, he too will be experiencing the construction related
problems. He noted that water runs through the annexation site, and expressed
concern regarding the loss of the wildlife when the area is developed.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Councilmembers Corman and Briere sympathized with the speakers, each
saying that development construction occurred near their homes as well.
Councilman Clawson noted that there will be an approval process for the
development of the subject site, and conditions concerning the construction
may be imposed. He indicated that under the State Growth Management Act,
smaller wild areas are sacrificed in order to have a more contiguous area on the
other side of the urban growth boundary.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT
THE 50/50 METHOD DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX; SUPPORT FUTURE
R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO
FORWARD THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY
REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Linda Herzog, Interim Assistant to the CAO, reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
The City distributed 15,548 copies of the Renton Community Resource
Directory, which is printed in eleven languages, in the first six months of
2005.
The King County Department of Public Health requested that the east end
of the swimming beach at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park be closed to
swimmers until further notice. This action was taken because levels of
fecal coliform and E. coli fluctuate widely from day to day in that section
only. The City is in the process of contracting a water quality consulting
firm to determine the origin of the contamination.
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 272
* Residents are encouraged to participate in the Salmon Watcher Program by
observing salmon -bearing streams during the salmon run season. An
educational presentation will be held August 31st, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00
p.m. at the Renton Community Center for interested volunteers.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7/18/2005. Council concur.
7/ 18/2005
Appointment: Planning
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Jimmy Cho, 241 Factory St. N., Renton,
Commission
98055, and Robert Bonner, 91 Williams Ave. S., Renton, 98055, each to the
Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring 6/30/2007. Refer to
Community Services Committee.
Finance: Administrator
Administrative, Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended
Appointment (Michael
confirmation of the appointment of Michael Bailey as the new Finance and
Bailey), Hire at Step E
Information Services Administrator, effective 9/1/2005; and approval of his
salary at Step E of the salary range. Council concur.
CAG: 05-098, Maple Valley
City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/20/2005 for CAG-05-098, Maple Valley
Hwy Improvements Cedar
Hwy. (SR-169) Improvements Phase 1 Cedar River Park Access; five bids;
River Park Access, Sanders
engineer's estimate $842,287; and submitted staff recommendation to award the
General Construction
contract to the low bidder, Sanders General Construction, in the amount of
$972,213. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee for discussion of
funding.
WSDOT: 2005 State Highway
City Clerk submitted annual Washington State Department of Transportation
Routes Certification
certification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities
and towns as of 7/1/2005 (required by RCW 47.24.010). Information.
Development Services:
Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Fotheringill Short Plat, ROW
dedication for additional right-of-way along the frontage of Duvall Ave. NE to
Dedication, Duvall Ave NE
fulfill a requirement of the Fotheringill Short Plat (SHP-04-134). Council
concur.
Annexation: Akers Farms,
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
108th Ave SE & SE 164th St
submitted 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Akers Farms
Annexation and recommended that a public hearing be held on 8/15/2005 to
consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 13.3 acres located south of Puget Drive S.
and east of 108th Ave. SE, if extended. Council concur.
CAG: 05-008, Lake Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-05-008, Lake Washington
Washington Blvd Slip Plane, Blvd. Slip Plane; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final
Northwest Cascade pay estimate in the amount of $121,837.47, commencement of 60-day lien
period, and release of retained amount of $22,384.32 to Northwest Cascade,
Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
Transportation: Rainier Ave S Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with
& Hardie Ave SW KPG, Inc. in the amount of $115,639.07 for design engineering services for the
Improvement Projects Design, Rainier Ave. S. and Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects, Phase I. Approval
KPG Inc was also sought to transfer funds totaling $200,000 from the NE 4th St. and
Hoquiam Ave. NE project and the Transit Center Video project to these
projects. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 273
Vacation: Bremerton Ave NE, Utility Systems Division reported submittal of the appraisal performed for the
Liberty Ridge, VAC-04-007 vacation of portions of Bremerton Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-007;
Liberty Ridge LLC, petitioner), and requested that Council accept the appraisal
and set compensation for the right-of-way at $5,170. Council concur.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE
Correspondence was read from Glenn Davis, Managing Partner, BDJS
Citizen Comment: Davis -
Associates, 1900 W. Nickerson, PMB 116-168, Seattle, 98119, requesting
Oversizing Request for
reimbursement in the amount of $51,264.24 for utilities oversizing along
Reimbursement, Urban Crafts,
Olympia Ave. NE for the Urban Crafts development. MOVED BY PERSSON,
BDJS Associates
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Chan -
Correspondence was read from Evan Chan, Project Manager, N&C Investments
Waiver Request for
LLC, 7432 SE 27th St., Mercer Island, 98040, requesting waiver of
Development & Mitigation
development and mitigation fees for the Morris Avenue Townhomes
Fees, Morris Ave Townhomes,
development located at 513 S. 2nd St. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED
N&C Investments
BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Added
Councilwoman Nelson noted receipt of a letter from Rev. Kenneth Colman, Co -
Citizen Comment: Colman -
Chair Renton Domestic Violence Task Force, United Christian Church, 1707
Municipal Court Security
Edmonds Ave. SE, Renton, 98058, regarding the lack of security in the Renton
Concerns
Municipal Court. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that the Administration is
reviewing the matter.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Planning & Development regarding the compensation for the City of Renton's street vacation request on
Committee behalf of Bales Limited Partnership (VAC-04-006). The Committee
Vacation: NE 4th St, City of recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept the appraisal
Renton, VAC-04-006 and waive compensation for the vacation of an eight -foot by 150-foot portion of
NE 4th St., located east of Rosario Ave. NE. MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation that Renton enter into
Human Services: 2006-2008 the joint interlocal agreement to receive Community Development Block Grant
CDBG Interlocal Agreement, funds through the King County Consortium for 2006-2008. The Committee
King County further recommended that the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into the agreement be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED
BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 274 for resolution.)
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 239307 - 239740 and one wire transfer totaling
$1,882,430.27; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 58507 - 58875, one wire
transfer, and 620 direct deposits totaling $2,067,280.59. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 274
Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the annual
Transportation: 2006-2011 TIP update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2006-2011,
and the Arterial Street Plan. The proposed TIP includes four new projects:
Rainier Ave. (S. 4th Pl. to S. 2nd St.); Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multi-Modal;
May Creek Bridge Replacement; and School Zone Sign Upgrades. Six
completed or cancelled projects were dropped from the program. The
Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be
presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. (See below for resolution.)
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution #3762 A resolution was read updating the City's Six -Year Transportation
Transportation: 2006-2011 TIP Improvement Program, 2006-2011. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED
BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
CARRIED.
Added A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Resolution #3763 interlocal cooperative agreement with King County regarding the Community
Human Services: 2006-2008 Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY
CDBG Interlocal Agreement, PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
King County
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 8/8/2005 for second and final reading:
Transportation: Street Closure
An ordinance was read amending Section 9-9-3 of Chapter 9, Street Closure, of
Ordinance
Title IX (Public Ways and Property) of City Code by allowing road closures of
one day or less to be governed by administrative action. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 8/8/2005.
CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance #5151
An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-220, Property Tax Exemption for
Planning: Multi -Family
Multi -Family Housing in Residential Targeted Areas, of Chapter 1,
Housing Property Tax
Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Exemption Modifications
City Code by modifying the designated residential targeted areas and other
project eligibility requirements. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Referring to the 2006 Budget schedule, Council President Briere expressed
Budget: 2006 Schedule concern regarding the review of fees and rates and the associated ordinances
prior to the presentation of the budget to Council. Discussion ensued
concerning the timing of the approval of any proposed fee and rate ordinance.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the budget schedule will be reviewed.
Council: Information Request Councilman Persson requested status reports on the following items: the hiring
on Various Issues of a new librarian; the proposed parks maintenance facility; the Skyway
Towing court case; the prostitution arrests at massage parlors and related City
August 1, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 275
Attorney vouchers; and the replacement of broken window glass at the Pavilion
Building and whether the glass was defective and under warranty.
Policy: Bidding and MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER
Contracting Requirements THE POLICY ON CONTRACTS TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE.*
(#250=02) In response to Mayor and staff inquiry, Councilman Persson clarified that he
wants a general discussion on the contract policy, including how contracts are
handled and how they are reported to the Council.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Council: Committee of the
Council President Briere announced that Committee of the Whole will meet on
Whole, Annexation Policy
8/9/2005, from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., in the Council Conference Room to
(8/9/2005)
discuss annexation policy.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS INTO
AND ADJOURNMENT
EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO
DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN
AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE
EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:45 p.m.
Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive
session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m.
tz)azt
](`I-t?H""& ,li r
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
August 1, 2005
Y
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR ,
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 1, 2005
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
(Briere)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE
(Persson)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
MON., 8/08 Introduction of New Finance &
6:30 p.m. Information Services Administrator -
Michael Bailey;
2nd Quarter Financial Report
TUES., 8/09 Annexation Policy and Strategy
2:00pm-5:00pm *Council Conference Room*
MON., 8/08 John G. DuBois Appointment to Library
4:30 p.m. Board;
Jimmy Cho and Robert Bonner
Appointments to Planning Commission
MON., 8/08
5:00 p.m.
THURS., 8/04
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 8/04
(Palmer) 3:00 p.m.
UTILITIES
(Gorman)
MON., 8/04
Vouchers;
Financial Management Policies
CANCELLED
AT&T Airport Lease Addendum;
AcuWings LLC Airport Operating Permit
and Sublease;
Aerodyne Aviation Airport Lease
Addendum;
KPG Contract for Rainier Ave. S. &
Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects;
Maple Valley Hwy. Improvements Cedar
River Access Project Bid Award
CANCELLED
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
QUERIN II ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF NNOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
August 1, 2005
The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property
owners in the proposed Querin II Annexation area representing approximately 25% of the area's
$987,000 assessed value. The King County Department of Assessments certified the signatures
on the petition on May 25, 2005.
The 7.3-acre site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is
designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
The site currently has King County R-4 zoning, which allows up to six units per gross acre. It is
the City's intent to rezone it to R-8, eight units per net acre, consistent with the RS land use
designation if the Council eventually accepts a 60% Direct Petition to Annex for this site. With
R-8 zoning the site would accommodate approximately 48 single-family detached dwelling units.
There currently are three detached dwellings on it.
The annexation site abuts the City on its western and southern boundary. No existing public
right-of-ways are proposed to be included in this annexation. The site is relatively flat where it
abuts Hoquiam Avenue NE but falls off in its northeastern corner near Honey Creek. The
eastern part of the site is considered to be in a high erosion area.
Under RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing
either at least 10% of the annexation areas assessed value. The current Notice of Intention to
Commence Annexation petition has signatures representing at least 25% of the area's assessed
value. The applicants had previously submitted a Notice of Intent Petition that included the three
parcels to the east but were not able to get sufficient signatures to represent 60% of the area's
assessed value.
Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting with the applicants in order to decide
whether the City wishes to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation.
If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will:
1. Authorize the circulation a 60% Direct Petition to Annex:
2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan; and,
3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair
share of the City's existing indebtedness.
Hearing.Handout 08-01-05.doc\
cm
n a m< CD
A oc rtes
1 8TH -ivOE
blv9I1J Ave
--—'CiL—- r
CD
gX
Frt 1400 Av --
— r
f� 1
rr� _
Ho uram K n—d—A S -
:�.
CD
th' QCD
_Y
CD I —,a
o y 4$thh l�v"E
� Op s"�� ~��J ; v � r� �• � Wit;`_' i;-�- ._ _.._ . ._ . -
o 150,th Av
p
s; i
C
�o
O
N
X
�
U �
�
� Q
Q
d
�L
O
�
N t
C
@
o11)
mo
E
2
tm-;
m
o
c c (6
O
20
x W
Z�
o
�0
um)N�
m N
3
¢ m
> N
0 7
N
V
` 0 N
C
X
> a T
«g c
O
O
a Ow
y O_ N
O- E C
N_ C
X O
+=
N O._
c S ui
O 1 0 0
n=
N C
M 3
S C U%
N(DI
L YO
N C
I
N
L
N
QC
a) 3CZ
2ma>
>�
m
U
>a)
m¢
b :3
(0 (C
NN
�2
N
N
>t
V S
^ lL
2
J
O' N
> C
m
E
C8
�
QQ
QQQ
coa).:3
O
C W
NI @
3 N
(9 t:--
N
X>
w c
O
(n
a
J
MU)
vh Z
w O
W
M [n
XLLJ
■ ■
■ ■
■ ■
I
i
Existing Conditions - Topography
7 �r�
�s l 7
Up to 30% slopes--rj
on eastern half of t
site
Topography Map �r '
cT I L71' ---
Existing Conditions - Environmental
■ T000araohv— rolling with steep slopes to
east
■ Environmental Constraints — Honey Creek
and its ravine result in steep slopes and a
high erosion area on eastern portion of site
County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual,
Level 2 flow -control standards or greater are
recommended
Existing Conditions — Sensitive Areas
Honey Creek and arc �o s t
its ravine impact -
eastern 1/3 of site
SF, TH
Sensitive Areas Map
I T*7 11
Existing Conditions — Public Services
■ Fire
■ District #25
. Utilities
��..
• Within Water District #90 Service Area
■ Within Renton Sewer Service Area
. Schools
■ Renton BrlseegaMrDistrict$
2
0
Existing Land Use Designation & Zonin
K.C. Land Use Map -
Urban Residential 4-12du/ac
R_4
K.C. Zoning - j�"[
R-4 - Residential 4 du/ac
Site / j I -
King County Zoning Map
Comprehensive Plan Annexation
Policies
■ Policy LU-378. Encourage
■ Subject site is located within
annexation of all territory
City's adopted PAA
within City's PAA as shown
on adopted land use map
■ Policy LU-386. Promote
■ Area is a peninsula surrounded
annexation for those who
by the City on three sides.
use City services or would
impact City infrastructure
Potential drainage impacts to
City infrastructure
■ Policy LU-388. Area
■ Annexation site does not divide
should include entire
existing established neighbor -
neighborhood rather than
hoods. Honey Creek Estates to
dividing it between
east, for example, is not affected
jurisdictions
Fiscal Impact Analysis
■ Assumes 3 existing houses w/ average
assessed value of $220,000
■ Assumes 43 new homes Win 10 years
■ Assumes average assessed value of
$400,000 for new R-8 units
■ Assumes one-time park development cost
of $27,176
Proposed Zoning if Annexed
RLD
Renton Comp Plan Land
Use Mai) — Residential Sint
Family (RS)
Proi)osed Renton Zoninc
R-8 (8 du/net acre)
Site
RS
Renton Comprehensive Plan
Relevant Boundary Review Board
Objectives
■ Preservation of natural
■ This annexation does not affect
neighborhoods and
the Honey Creek Estates
communities
neighborhood to the east
■ Use of physical
■ Existing streets (Hoquiam) and
boundaries
city boundaries define the site
■ Prevention of abnormal)
■ Proposed boundaries are not
irre ular boundaries
irregular
■ Annexation of cities of
■ The subject annexation site is
unincorporated areas
urban in character and is located
which are urban in
within Renton's designated PAA
character
Fiscal Impact
One time parks acquisition and development cost of $27,176
3
Y
Conclusion
■ This proposed annexation is generally
consistent with City annexation policies
and relevant Boundary Review Board
objectives for annexation
■ No major impediments to the provision of
City services to the area have been
identified
Recommended Motion
■ The Administration recommends that Council:
. Accept the 10% Notice of Intent Petition for
the revised Querin Annexation
■ Authorize circulation of a 60% Direct Petition
to Annex that requires:
. the adoption of City zoning consistent with the Comp Plan's
RS land use designations and,
■ that property owners within the annexation area assume their
proportional share of the City's outstanding indebtedness.
Conclusion, continued
■ City would incur a one-time parks
development cost of $27,175 but would net
approximately $9,278 per year in revenue
in 2005 dollars
■ Proposed annexation appears to further
City Business Goals and be in the best
interest of the City
q.
3
4
Y
♦ � rs-
FALK II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
WITH R-8 ZONING
August 1, 2005
The City is in receipt of a 50150 Direct Petition from property owners and registered voters in the
proposed annexation area (see map on back of handout). Council last considered this annexation
on December 6, 2004, when it authorized circulation of the direct petition to annex.
The subject site is located within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is designated
Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site
currently is zoned R-1 under the County's zoning but is scheduled to be up zoned consistent with
their new Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the area west of 102nd Avenue SE. The
site currently has five detached dwelling units on it and, under Renton's Comprehensive Plan RS
land use designation, would be zoned R-8 if brought into the City. With such zoning, it could
support as estimated 40 single-family detached dwellings with an estimated future population of
up to 100 persons.
The applicant has selected to use the so-called 50/50 method of annexation. This method was
adopted by the State legislature in the spring of 2003 and signed into law as SSB 5409 by the
Governor on May 15, 2003. This new method requires a direct petition with signatures of
property owners representing a majority of the area within the annexation site, as well as
signatures representing a majority of the registered voters residing within the boundaries of the
annexation site. The King County Assessor's Office certified on June 6, 2005, that there were
sufficient signatures from property owners to represent a majority of the acreage within the
annexation site King County Records, Elections, and Licensing Services has also certified on
June 28, 2005, that there are signatures representing a majority of the registered voters residing
in the area proposed for annexation. Petition signers agreed to accept zoning, at the time of
annexation, consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan, as well as assume their proportionate
share of the City's outstanding indebtedness.
Council is required to hold two public hearings on future zoning for the subject area if it decides
to accept the applicant's 50150 Direct Petition to Annex. Tonight's public hearing would be the
first of these if Council accepts the direct petition to annex.
Recommendation:
The Administration is recommending that Council accept the 50/50 Direct Petition to annex for
the Falk II Annexation and support future R-8 zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map designation for this area. It is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of
Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for their mandatory 45-day review.
CADocuments and Settings\rnpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Council Hearing Handout 08-01-05.doc
45t
h St
Imo° I I L_L _I- iItV ATI
Proposed Falk 11 Annexation
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — — City Limits
Alex Pielsch, Administrator
G. Del Rosario Proposed Annex. Area
ANT 10 December 2004
a
th
I,7
0 600 1200
1 : 7200
W
Q
0
I �; l��I- � �- /
Existing Conditions - Vicinity
COO � i�� �V
Located im��nne5 i tely —{
south i5f 20D� ak I-
Annetion
�iIFTI
H —*— alk I '-
r
s J-11 x,
SE192nd St
l 1
Vicinity Map
Falk II Annexation
Public Hearing
50150 Direct Petition
Possible Future Zoning
August 1, 2005
Existing Conditions
• PAA - Within Renton's Potential Annexation Area
• Location - west side of 102nd Avenue SE and
south of SE 185d, Place, if extended
• Size - 6.4 acres, including abutting 102nd Ave
ROW
• Uses - 5 single-family dwellings
• Boundaries - site abuts Renton on its north, and
west boundaries
Existing Conditions - Structures
Five existing s ctures
on 6.29 acre site R 8
Structures Map
IN
1
Existing Conditions - Public Services
• Fire - Fire District 40
• Utilities
Within Soos Creek
Water and Sewer District
- Roadway and stormwater
improvements likely
• School District
- Renton School District
,.ate
Renton Land Use Designation
and Potential Zoning
Renton Comp Plan Land S..
F
Use Map - Residential �r
Single Family SITE
Renton Zoning Map - # Y
R-8 (8 du/netacre)
Consistent with zoning
to west and compatible I A. V,
with K.C. zoning to east
SITE �
Figure 6 - Renton Zoning Map
Existing Conditions -
Environmental
County Land Use Designation
and Existing Zoning
King County Comp Plan
Designation — Urban
Residential 4-12 du/ac
Kim _County Zoning - R
4 du/gross acre
Site
Figure 5 - King County Zoning Map
Fiscal Impact Analysis
• General Fund cost and revenue implications
— Assumes 38 new single-family homes at full
development
— Assumes a new home value of $400,000
— Assumes 2 dwellings remain on site
• Annual Estimated Net Impact = +$12,715/yr.
— Estimated one time City cost of $22,381 for
future park acquisition and improvements
2
Falk II Annexation Fiscal Impact
Recommendation.
The Administration recommends that Council:
• Accept the 50150 Method Direct Petition to
Annex
• Support future R-8 zoning consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan land use designation
• Authorize the Administration to forward the
Notice of Intent package to the Boundary
Review Board, and
• Authorize the Administration to begin
preparing annexation and zoningordinances for
future Council consideration
3
Falk /-' # dollesP.
by,,,; da stew y,
Since the Falk Annexation the following has happened.
1. Argument over property line. Tried to claim 2 1/2 ft.
by 410 ft. of our property.
2. Cut down every tree on property. Many, many trees.
This opened up our property to more wind and destroyed
beauty of the area & homes for wildlife.
3. All stumps, limbs & debris were piled 2 or 3 stories high.
A powerful machine was used to grind material shooting
out chunks of wood that went high enough to clear
our 100ft. trees and land in our yard. One chunk went
through the roof of one of our out -buildings & landed
on our motorhome damaging the top which is heavy
aluminum. One of the chunks of wood was large
enough to kill a person.
4. The Falk property was pretty level with ours. After all
the digging & moving, one area is 6 ft. lower, another
section is 12ft. higher.
The dirt was continually moved & then compressed.
This caused our house to shake as in an earthquake.
5. The noise is quite severe. Talk about disturbing
the peace!
6. The trucks and machines create an atmosphere
similar to a dust storm.
Dust has covered all our trees &plants & inside
the house if we dare open a window.
Yard work is impossible because of the noise,
dust & flying debris. It creates difficulty in breathing
and causes one to cough.
We want to know who is liable for any damage that may
have occurred because of the vibration of our home?
Who will repair the damage? We feel there is a need
for compensation for all the stress & inconvenience
this has caused. It is a very upsetting situation for us
especially if annexation is approved and this continues
during the building of additional homes.
We would like a list of names of eligible voters.
t` l Z
I
�� On" (0/1) - ?Fos^S-
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 1, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
GENERAL INFORMATION
The August 2005 edition of CitySource, the City's newsletter to citizens and businesses, will be featured in the
August 3rd issue of the Renton Reporter. This edition will feature detailed information about the impact of the
ban on fireworks; new shopping cart regulations; the upcoming delegation visit to Cuautla; a summary of the
free natural yard care workshops; volunteer opportunities for the Salmon Watcher program; open registration
for the Police Department Citizens Academy; July City Council highlights; and a calendar of upcoming events.
CitySource can also be found on the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, through the Spotlight section under
the press release option.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The City of Renton Resource Directory, printed in eleven languages, distributed 15, 458 copies in the first six
months of 2005. The top five languages are: English 45.3%, Spanish 17.3%, Vietnamese 8.2%, Russian 7%,
and Chinese 4.1 %. During this time period, the Renton Community Service Office of the Department of Health
& Human Services distributed approximately 3,500 copies. The next highest user was the Renton Housing
Authority with 2,000 copies. The directories are also included in our New Resident Packets and are readily
available by calling Human Services at 425-430-6650.
The annual tennis carnival will be held Tuesday, August 9"', from 1 to 3 pm, at the McKnight Middle School
tennis courts. This free event is for ages 7 to 16 and includes games, prizes, refreshments, and contests. No
pre -registration required. For more information, call the Renton Community Center at 425-430-6700.
The popular Kennydale Beach Splash Day will be held Thursday, August 1 ld', from noon to 3 p.m. Join the
lifeguards for a fun day of games and contests! This free event is for ages 16 and under. For more information,
call the Renton Community Center at 425-430-6700.
The King County Department of Pubic Health requested that the east end of the swimming beach at Gene
Coulon Memorial Beach Park be closed to swimmers until further notice. This action was taken because levels
of fecal coliform and E. coli fluctuate widely from day to day in that section only. Several other areas are also
being tested, but have been found to be within acceptable water quality standards for safe swimming. The King
County Department of Natural Resources routinely checks the water weekly during the swimming season, but
has agreed to increase testing to several times per week. The City of Renton is in the process of contracting a
water quality consulting firm to determine the origin of the contamination. It may be several weeks or months
before a definitive answer can be determined.
Administrative Report
August 1, 2005
Page 2
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Residents are encouraged to participate in the Salmon Watcher Program by observing salmon -bearing streams
during the salmon run season. Volunteers will record how many salmon they see at a selected location and the
date and time of their site visits. In Renton, volunteers can select from sites along the Cedar River and May
Creek that are best for salmon watching. An educational presentation will be held August 3151, from 7 to 9 p.m.
at the Renton Community Center for interested volunteers. For more information please call 425-430-7392.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
• The Renton Police Department is teaming up with neighborhoods on Tuesday, August 2°d, to give crime and
drugs a going away party during National Night Out. Twenty different neighborhoods will host block parties,
potlucks, barbecues, dessert socials, or casual get-togethers to strengthen neighborhood ties. This year, Puget
Sound Energy's Energy Efficiency Department will be participating by providing special lights, coupons, and
brochures promoting energy -efficient external lighting.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/Mayor's Office
Staff Contact...... Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Subject:
Planning Commission Appointments
Jimmy Cho
Robert Bonner
Exhibits:
Community Service Applications
A1 a
For Agenda of: August 1, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Refer to Community Services Committee Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appoints the following to the Planning Commission for three-year terms
expiring on June 30, 2007:
0
Jimmy Cho, 241 Factory St. N, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 206-769-7358 (position previously held by
Natalie Dohrn).
Robert Bonner, 91 Williams Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055; Phone 253-452-5246 (position previously
held by Gene Ledbury).
The other members of the Board are: Geraldine Jackson, Raymond Giometti, Rosemary Quesenberry,
Jerrilynn I ladley, and Nancy Osborn.
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICA TION FOR C'OMMUNITYSF,RVICE
�fA��
If you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards, comimssloiis; bt i e
committees, please complete this application and return it to:
Office of the Mayor
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Check the boards/commissions/committees in which you are interested:
❑
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE *
❑
LIBRARY BOARD p
w
❑
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT *
Lk
MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION *
❑
BOARD OF ETHICS *
❑
PARK BOARD
❑
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION *
0
PLANNING COMMISSION
❑
HOUSING AUTHORITY *
❑
SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Ivi
HUMAN RIGHTS & AFFAIRS COMMISSION *
❑
SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - CUAUTLA
❑
HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE *I
SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - NISHIWAKI
*Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.ci.renton.wa.us or call 425-430-6500 for details.
Your
application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur.
MR. NJ MS. ❑ NAME.1W AL DATE D�
ADDRESS- � ' ZIPCODE
i
PHONE: DAY 2U6 q— NIGHT_ rEMAII, i hc%u k a c C� l o S iGaT
RENTON RESIDENT? T t�!✓/�c //�irl/� L1J .ULi'7 IOW LONG? Jvs-T
Z ;uo.vrKt
CITY OF FORMER RESIDENCE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND �%9 'l/iy��si i y r�r' ��rc�c�l1 � IWV14,��n
e-
OCCUPATION EMPLOYER X;'z7/y 7
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND--,4ACtt r- V c ewir
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES (organizations/clubs/servicegroups, etc.)ir��
REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE�lANI A
�iiPGrf/jsr� //(/ ,C�E;y<d/� ;` �,/�s6/ >e �eC,ywrd l•✓�'�Ly�� �.a/ /�/y G4kr`�lullli`� �_�
CAN ATTEND DAY MEETINGS? CAN ATTEND NIGHT MEETINGS?
Applications will be kept on file for one year. If you have questions about serving on a board,
commission, or committee, please feel free to contact the Mayor's Office at 425-430-6500.
121001
-5hAre) t R. Ricca L t
114Jr," l 1q• '5 rn j a 114,
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE
If you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards,
;ommissions, or committees, please complete this application and return it to:
Office of the Mayor RFGFIVECI.
R , U n d City of Renton
zimmetPAart 1055 South Grady Way APR 14 2005
s. Mpyer
tV . aorte5 Renton, WA 98055 4 . ����''Wi
- -b^,, rr x, nn lVix�A-A /t w►V p ,,.I �
Check the boards/commissions/committees in which you are interested.
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ LIBRARY BOARD
❑ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT* ❑ MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION*
❑ BOARD OF ETHICS* ❑ PARK BOARD*
❑ TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD ® PLANNING COMMISSION*
❑ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION* ❑ SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE*
❑ HOUSING AUTHORITY* ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - CUAUTLA
❑ HUMAN RIGHTS & AFFAIRS COMMISSION* ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE - NISHIWAKI
❑ HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE*
* Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.ci.renton.wa.us or call 425-430-6500 for details. f
Your application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur.
MR. MS. ❑ N``AME_XOgw- 6clslA 72 _ _ -- — DATE_ JJ Jj,*
ADDRESS_ V % ie. �W S . ----- — --- 'LIP CODE J 8�G s
eHONE: DAY_'T2S•'452. S246 NIGHT -9125. �32.44z j EMAIL_.. 8C-UL=�46
RENTON RESIDENT? ��5. S.
HOW LONG?
CITY OF FORMER RESIDENCE_ BRIA eVOEF WA
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND tTtF-C-rL4PQ E
FAM4TIGS
OCCUPATION et'k" W q EMPLOYER_ G I TY 0* (d U,E'y" F
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND A IZC44 I1t�Ty RAL :IRMS IN CAW POW/A; bes tW
(p`s'ela. peyew oeS MDirtS t�NAT o�INT�IN S "3Q-l�f�i0'1 S
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES (organizations/clubs/service groups, etc.) WV\4A4 `& QN .
REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE t N) TH15 MANWI 6-
�N n b�S�tGN � R.fi�`�Ns � __ _�•
BAN ATTEND DAY MEF,TINGS?_ CAN ATTEND NIGHT MEETINGS?- CS
Applications will be kept on file for one year. If you have questions about serving on a board,
021004 co►n►nission, or committee, please feel free to contact the Mayor's Office at 425-430-6500.
CITY (7F RI-;N11)N ('OUN(]I-, AGFNDA BIL1,
Suhmitting Data:
Dcpt!Di� tBoard.. AJI.S'Mayor's Office
Staff Contact...... Jay Covington, CAO
For Agenda of: August 1, 2005
agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public I Iearing..
_
Subject:
Appointment ofMichael Bailey as the new Finance &
Correspondence..
Information Systems Administrator
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
l;xhibits:
New Business.......
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Resume
Information.........
Recommended Action:
('orincil Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Fxpcnditure Required...
:Amount Budgeted.......
IL Total Project Budget
None
Approvals:
Legal Dept....
Finance Dept
Other............
"Transfer/Amcndmcnt.......
Revenue Generated.........
City Share total Project..
Sl NINIARY OF ACTION:
Follov�ing the January 2005 resignation of Victoria Runkle, Finance and Infunnation Services
Administrator, a nation��ide recruitment was conducted to find a replacement. The Mayor and I are
pleased to recommend for your concurrence the appointment of Michacl Bailey as the new Finance and
In€iOrmation Systems Administrator, effcctiye September 1, 2005.
Mr. Bailey's extensive experience includes over twenty years as a Finance Director for the cities of
Lynn"ood, Everett and Wenatchee, and the Metropolitan Park District of "Tacoma. Fie has outstanding
experience in the areas of budgeting, financial management, and technology.
Given Mr. Bailey's exceptional background and qualifications, the Administration is recommending a
beginning salary at the 1:" step of salary grade m49. Because this is the grade and step of -the former
FIS Administrator, there will be no budget impact. Mr. Bailey will also be granted an initial sick leave
and vacation balance. This grade and step are currently authorized in the 2005 budget, but city policy
requires City Council approval to hire above the "(." step.
STAFF RECONIIVIFNI)ATION:
IThc Administration recommends that Council confirm the appointment of Mr. Bailey as the new Finance
and Information Administrator, cftcctiyc September 1, 2005, and approve his salary at the'T."' step of the
FIS Administrator salary grade m49.
R'nt{'nnrt �;�nY+ill hti
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 1, 2005
TO: Terry Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
t
FROM: 1`� Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
CC: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Appoint Michael Bailey as Finance & Information
Systems Administrator
In January 2005, Finance and Information Services Administrator Victoria Runkle resigned to
accept a similar position in Arvada, Colorado. Since that time, Mike Wilson has served as
interim FIS Administrator during the City's nationwide recruitment.
The Mayor and I are pleased to recommend for your concurrence the appointment of Michael
Bailey as our new Finance & Information Systems Administrator, effective September 1, 2005.
Mr. Bailey's extensive experience includes over twenty years as a Finance Director for the cities
of Lynnwood, Everett and Wenatchee, and the Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma. We
received outstanding feedback from everyone we contacted regarding his capability,
effectiveness, and leadership in the areas of budgeting, financial management, and technology.
In addition to recommending your concurrence of Mr. Bailey's appointment, the Administration
is advising a beginning salary at the "E" step of salary grade m49, givers his exceptional
background and qualifications. This is the grade and step of former FIS Administrator Runkle;
there will be no budget impact. Mr. Bailey will also be granted an initial sick leave and vacation
balance in recognition of his forfeiting unused leave balances to accept the Renton position..
Michael E. Bailey, CPA
9421 15" St NE
Lake Stevens, WA 98258
Ph. 425.334.5144
baileyno6@msn.com
Continue to seek rewarding and challenging professional opportunities, helping
communities and their support service agencies realize their potential.
EVerlerm 1999 to Current City of Lynnwood Lynnwood WA
Finance Director
• Supervise Budget, Accounting, Treasury, Purchasing, Information Services,
Performance Management and Risk Management.
• Treasurer and board member of South Snohomish County Public Facilities
District
• 1 am the City Clerk and City Treasurer for the city.
• Developed GFOA award winning budget
• Developed award winning Performance Management System
• Supervise a staff of 35, there were 350 total city employees
1992-1999 City of Everett EverettWA
Finance Director
• Supervise Accounting, Treasury, Purchasing, Information Services — advise
on budgeting
• Introduced strategic budgeting and fmancial policies.
• Supervised a staff of 45, there were 1,000 total city employees.
1987-1992 City of Wenatchee Wenatchee WA_
Finance Director
• Supervised all administrative functions for the city
• Developed GFOA award winning CAFR and budget.
• Supervised 12, there were 300 total city employees
1982-1987 Metropolitan Park District Tacoma, WA
Finance Director
• Supervised accounting, treasury, budget, information services
• Developed GFOA award winning CAFR and budget
• Supervised 12, there were 350 total district employees
1980-1982 Pierce County Tacoma. WA
Accounting Program Manager
• Supervised all administrative functions for the grant funded agency
• Developed program management software linked to financial system
• Supervised 2, there were 30 total agency employees
Edtf 1979 University of Puget Sound Tacoma, WA
• B.A., Business Administration and Accounting.
• GPA 3.45
1981 University of Puget Sound Tacoma, WA
• M.B.A., Public Administration
• GPA 3.6
Pnofessim►W Wrests. Vice Chair, Government Finance Officers Association Standing Committee on
Budget and Management — 2002 / 2004
Member, GFOA Budget Review Committee — In House Reviewer
Member, Washington State Auditor's Local Government Advisory Committee
Member, Future Business Leaders of America — Professional Division
Develop and lead annual 2-day budgeting workshops held twice each year —
sponsored by Association of Washington Cities and WFOA
Milaw Service . Served US Air Force 1975 to 1980 — Honorable Discharge
Accompfthmerft Certified Public Accountant, 1982, 48354
GFOA State Representative for Washington State 2000/2002
President, Washington Finance Officers Association 1999 / 2000.
FBLA National Business Person of the Year — 1998
Authored "Budgeting for Cities and Towns in Washington State" published by the
Association of Washington Cities
Authored numerous articles for Governing West, WFOA, AWC and the Municipal
Research and Services Center on Budgeting and general local government topics.
Persond Married 29+ years
Four children ages 20 to 25
Enjoy traveling and sightseeing
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Dept/Div/Board ... City Clerk
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
Bid opening on 7/20/2005 for CAG-05-098,
Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Improvements -Phase 1
Cedar River Park Access Project
EXHIBITS:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids)
IVAMJW'�
FOR AGENDA OF: August 1, 2005
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent......... X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance.......
Resolution......
Old Business....
New Business....
Study Session...
Other...........
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required.... $972,213 this construction contract Transfer/Amendment.. $248,300.00
Expenditure Required $1,366,100 Total-2005
Amount Budgeted...... $1,117,800 Total-2005 Revenue Generated...
Total Project Budget.. $1,117,800 Total-2005 City Share Total Project...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $842,287.00
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following
criteria: There was more than one bid. One irregularity occurred with the apparent low bidder's bid
calculation, which makes Sanders General Construction the low bidder. The low bid submitted by
Sanders General Construction in the amount of $972,213, however, was above the amount budgeted for
the project. Therefore, staff recommends referral of the bid to the Transportation (Aviation) Committee to
discuss covering the $248,300 shortfall by transferring funds from other transportation projects.
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 27, 2005
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor
STAFF CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller, Project Manager, x73030/'
SUBJECT: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements — Phase 1:
Cedar River Park Access
The work on the Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements — Phase 1: Cedar River
Park Access Project will include the installation of a new signalized intersection and
access road into the Cedar River Park. This is the first phase of the improvements for the
SR 169 improvements near I-405.
The project is ranked number 4 in the 2005-2010 TIP and currently has $1,117,800
budgeted in 2005. The lowest bid submitted by Sanders General Construction fell over
the project's construction budget of $935,027 at $972,213, and over the engineer's
estimate of $842,287. Bids were higher than the engineer's estimate because of weather -
related difficulties that must be accommodated during fall and winter construction.
One irregularity occurred with the bids. The apparent low bidder, Pellco Construction
Company, erred on the bid total calculation. When the Pellco bid was disqualified,
Sanders General Construction Company became the lowest bidder.
The Transportation Design Section is asking for additional funds to be transferred from
other Transportation accounts to cover the additional construction costs, Puget Sound
Energy construction costs and construction contingencies. Below is the breakdown of
our budget and expenditures to date, as well as estimated future expenditures:
$ 50,000
Expended to date
$ +972,213
$ +138,087
$ +73,000
$ +132,800
$ $1,366,100
Construction Contract
Puget Sound Energy Contracts
7.5%Contingency
Construction administration/inspection/material testing/staff time
Total 2005 Expenditures
$ 1,117,800 Total Existing Prop_rammed Budget for 2005
$ 248,300 Shortfall
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
July 27, 2005
Page 2
Re: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements — Phase 1: Cedar River Park Access
To cover the $248,300 shortfall, the Transportation Design Section recommends the
transfer of funds from:
1) NE 4ch Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE Project (2005-2010 TIP #15) of $100,000. This
project has been deferred, in part, due to developer issues.
2) Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project (2005-2010 TIP #53) of $20,000.
This project is basically completed.
3) Rainier Avenue — S/SW 7`h Street to 41h Place (2005-2010 TIP #16) of $30,000. This
project has gotten a late start due to the selection of a consultant.
4) 1 % for the Arts in the amount of $14,000. Payment for 2004 was paid in 2005.
5) Bicycle Route Development Program (2005-2010 TIP #36) of $10,000. This project
will be deferred unless a successful grant application is secured.
6) Arterial Circulation Program (2005-2010 TIP #18) of $45,000. Funding is available
due to the fact that consultant services for modeling are not anticipated. However, if
consultant services are needed, we will defer this work into next year.
7) Missing Links Program (2005-2010 TIP #33) for $29,300. There have been no
developer partnering projects identified to date or other locations studied for
inclusion to date in 2005. Needs will be deferred.
The Transportation Design Section also recommends that 1) the contract be awarded to
Sanders General Construction, and, 2) the agenda bill outlining this project be referred to
Transportation Committee for discussion.
Attachments: Bid Tab
Reallocation 2005
cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor
Rob Lochmiller, Transportation Design Project Manager
Sharon Griffin, Transportation Planning, Program Development Coordinator
File
11 \Division s\TRANSPOR TAnADMIMCOMMiITTEE REPORTS\2005\Contract Award Memo 050725 I.doc
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Page 1 of 10
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No Et►gineer's Sanders General Cottstructi4n Pejlca Con&tructlan;; Ina " GaryWrltno Construction Co.
Bid Dace Ntednesday JuEy 2a 20195 2 30 PM Estimate 518$ NW Sammamish Rd 23105 58th AVeW* 9125 1Oth Ave. S >
Engineer Robert t achmdler IssaquaF► WA 98027 Mout�tlakeTerrace, WA 98043 Seattle, WA 98108
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
01 1040001319 Minor Change 1.00 CAL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
02 1040011002 Final Cleanup 1.00 LS
2,000.00
2,000.00
5,300.00
5,300.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
03 1070007736 SPCC Plan 1.00 LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
18,500.00
18,500.00
17,500.00
17,500.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
04 1050000001 Contractor Supplied 1.00 LS
Surveying
15,000.00
15,000.00
800.00
800.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
500.00
500.00
05 1090000001 Mobilization 1.00 LS
74,600.00
74,600.00
32,000.00
32,000.00
33,600.00
33,600.00
82,000.00
82,000.00
06 1100020001 Traffic Control (1-10) 1.00 LS
2,000.00
2,000.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
11,300.00
11,300.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
07 1100050001 Sequential Arrow Sign 360.00 HR
3.00
1,080.00
12.00
4,320.00
6.26
2,250.00
1.00
360.00
08 1100006972 Traffic Control Supervisor 580.00 HR
40.00
23,200.00
44.00
25,520.00
48.90
28,362.00
40.00
23,200.00
09 1100050002 Traffic Control Labor 580.00 HR
36.00
20,880.00
44.00
25,520.00
40.75
23,635.00
35.00
20,300.00
10 2010005001 Roadside Cleanup 1.00 FA
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
11 2020005001 Removal Of Structure And 1.00 LS
_ Obstruction
20,250.00
20,250.00
4,400.00
4,400.00
9,000.00
9,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
12 2020005002 Remove Catch Basin 1.00 EA
500.00
500.00
150.00
150.00
450.00
450.00
400.00
400.00
13 2020000078 Remove Existing Fence 220.00LF
4.00
880.00
3.00
660.00
3.00
660.00
6.00
1,320.00
14 2030000310 Roadway Excavation Incl. 920.00 Cy
Haul
25.00
23,000.00
16.00
14,720.00
27.00
24,840.00
14.00
12,880.00
15 2030005001 Gravel Borrow Incl. Haul 3,220.00TON
18.00
57,960.00
13.50
43,470.00
18.50
59,570.00
15.00
48,300.00
16 2030000350 Unsuitable Foundation 50.000Y
Excavation Including Haul
25.00
1,250.00
6.00
300.00
39.50
1,975.00
40.00
2,000.00
17 2090007006 Structural Excavation Class 110.000Y
Inc. Haul
15.00
1,650.00
16.00
1,760.00
38,00
4,180.00
15.00
1,650.00
18 2090008001 Shoring Or Extra Excavation 2,380.00 SF
Class B
1.50
3,570.00
0.25
595.00
3.00
7,140.00
3.00
7,140.00
19 2100001030 Ditch Excavation Incl. Haul 12.00 Cy
26.00
300.00
45.00
640.00
61.00
612.00
40.00
480.00
20 4040000003 Crushed Surfacing Base 770.00TON
Course
25.00
19,250.00
22.00
16,940.00
22.00
16,940.00
24.00
18,480.00
21 4040005120 Crushed Surfacing Top 70.00 TON
25.00
1,750.00
37.00
2,590.00
25.80
1,806.00
24.00
1,680.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller ""
i�.�:i Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 2 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Con#rac# No Engineer's Sanders GeMeral Construction Pelico Construction,. lnc Gary MerGnq Construction Co..
Bid.DateWednesday Juiy 2(} 2Q05 2 30, PM Estimate 5188 NW Sammamtsh Rd 2.3105 58tti Ave Y1t 9125 10th Ave. S
Engineer, RaberttEzehmAier Issaquah.:WA 98tl27 MouratEatc$Tertace, WA:980G3 Seattle; WA: 98108
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PREE:E
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
Cou rse
22 5040000114 HMA Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 520.OoTON
85.00
44,200.00
79.00
41,080.00
74.75
38,870.00
65.00
33,800.00
23 5040000115 HMA Class 1 In. PG 64-22 710.00TON
85.00
60,350.00
79.00
56,090.00
74.75
53,072.50
52.00
36,920.00
24 5040000116 Job Mix Compliance Price 1.000ALC
Adjustment
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
25 5040000117 Compaction Price Adjustment 1.00 CAL
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
26 6100000001 Concrete Barrier Type A 190.00 LF
55.00
10,450.00
90.00
17,100.00
140.00
26,600.00
200.00
38,000.00
27 6130000001 Structural Earth Wall 1,150.00SF
26.00
28,750.00
35.00
40,250.00
38.00
43,700.00
35.00
40,250.00
28 6130000002 Backfill For Structural Eart 210.00 CY
Wall Incl. Haul
35.00
7,350.00
37.00
7,770.00
46.80
9,828.00
27.00
5,670.00
29 7010001160 Underdrain Pipe 6" Diameter 200.00 LF
15.00
3,000.00
5.00
1,000.00
9.00
1,800.00
18.00
3,600.00
30 7010007014 Gravel Backfill for Drains 155.00 CY
35.00
5,425.00
26.00
4,030.00
34.00
5,270.00
20.00
3,100.00
31 7040000002 HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe 12 470.00 LF
In. Diam.
32.00
15,040.00
44.00
20,680.00
32.85
15,439.50
55.00
25,850.00
32 7040000003 Ductile Iron Pipe 12 In. Dia 85,00 LF
50.00
4,250,00
68.00
5,780.00
56.50
4,802.50
70.00
5,950.00
33 7050003091 Catch Basin Type 1 12.00EA
1,200.00
14,400.00
850.00
10,200.00
1,250.00
15,000.00
700.00
8,400.00
34 7050000013 Adjust Existing Manhole 3.00EA
500.00
1,600,00
500.00
1,500.00
200.00
600.00
600.00
1,800.00
35 7050000012 Adjust Existing Catch Basin 2.00EA
500.00
1,000.00
200.001
400.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
1,200.00
36 7050000034 Connection To Drainage 1.00 EA
Structure
500.00
500.00
650.00
650.00
900.00
900.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
37 7120000002 Adjust Existing Valve Box To 3.00 EA
Grade
300.00
900.00
130.00
390.00
140.00
420.00
400.00
1,200.00
38 8010006403 ESC Lead 60.00 DAYS
150.00
9,000.00
50.00
3,000.00
130.00
7,800.00
50.00
3,000.00
39 8010006471 Inlet Protection 33.00 EA
100.00
3,300.00
55.00
1,815.00
75.00
2,475.00
80.00
2,640.00
40 8010000002 Straw Bale 78.00 EA
25.00
1,950.00
19.00
1,482.00
17.50
1,365.00
10.00
780.00
41 8010006490 Erosion/Water Pollution 1.00 FA
Control
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
42 8010000003 Silt Fence 530.00LF
6.00
3,180.00
4.50
2,385.00
6.00
3,180.00
4.00
2,120.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller
';,::,, ; Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7/21i2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 3 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No
. ESanders General onstuo GaryV1enoContruction Co.s Peltco Construction Inc
Bd DaWcy? Etmate 516WSammamisRd 23905 58th Ave_ N 9125 10th:Ave. S
Engineers Robert: t Qchmdier " lasaquah; WA 98g27 MountlalCeTettace, WA:800.3 .:::. Seattle, WA:98108
ITEM
ITEM CODE
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
43
44
3C2CCCOCCI
8020006414
Property Restoration
Seeding, Fertilizing, and
Mulching
1.00 FA
0,10ACRE
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00�
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
200.00
11,040.00, 1,104.00
6,400.00
640.00
8,000.00!
800.00
45
_
8086319552
PSIPE Superform Maple (2"
Cal.)
2.00 EA
275.00
550.00
310.W
620.00
290.00
580.00
200.001
400.00
46
8085690552
PSIPE Arnold Promise
Witchhazel (5gal.)
8.00 EA
45.00
360.00
62,001
496.00
58.00
464.00
50.00
400.00
47
8086318552
PSIPE Stella D'Oro Daylily
620.00 EA
8.00
4,960.00
8.00
4,960.00
8.50
5,270.00
6.00'
3,720.00
48
8085944552
PSIPE Emerald Green
Arborvitae
40.00 EA
50.00
2,000.00
27.00
1,080.00
33.00
1,320.00
23.00
920.00
49
_
8085942552
PSIPE Dwarf Strawberry Tree
(5 Gal.)
18.00 EA
50.001
900.00
32.00
576.00
37.25
670.50
26.00
468.00
50
8085697652
PSIPE Barren Strawberry (1
Gal.)
1,239.00 EA
8.00
9,912.00
9.001
11,151.00
8.50
10,531.50
7.00
8,673.00
51
52
8086759552
8020CC6581
PSIPE Kinnikinnick (1 Gal.)
Bark Mulch
184.00 EA
28.00CY
7.00
1,288.00
8.00
1,472.00
8.50
23.30
1,564.00
6.00
35.00�
1.104.00
980.00
45.00
1,260.00
43.00 1,204.00
662.40
53
802CO06555
Sod Installation
11.00 SY
9.00
99.00
6,480.00
30.00
30.00
330.00
4,320.00
23.30
256.30
23.00
24.00
253.00
3,456.00
54 8020006405 Top Soil Type A 144.00 Cy
45.00
42.00
6,048.00
55
802COC6410
Topsoil Type B
23 0. 00 Cy
45.00
10,350.00
26.00
5,980.00
42.00
9,660.00
21.00'
4,830.00
56
803CO00003
Irrigation System
1.00 LS
7,000.00
7,000.00
r-
35,500.00
35,500.00
13,705.00
13,705.00
25,000.O0
25,000.00
57
8030000CC4
Restoration Of Existing
Irrigation System
1.00 FA
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00;
5,000.00
58
8040000001
Cement Conc. Traffic Curb
And Gutter
910.00 LF
15.00
13,650.00
19.00.
17,290.00
14.55
13,240.50
20.00
18,200.00
59
6C
804000OCC2
8040OCCC03
Cement Conc_Traffic Curb
Extruded Curb
180.00 LF
330.00LF
6.00
1,080.00
31.00.
5.00
5,580.00
1,650.00
20,90
3,762.00
15.00:
5.00
2,700.00
1,650.00
4.00
1,320.00
4.651
1,534.50
61
8090006882
Raised Pavement Marker,
Type 1
2.00 HUND
300.00
600.00
200.001
400.00
175.00
350.00
150.00,
300.00
62
8090006884
Raised Pavement Markers
2.00HUND
500.00
1,000.00
400.00
800.00
350.00
700.00
300.001
600.00
Run By: Rob LOChmlller : # Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 4 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract Norigrneer:s; Sandars Ger►eral Construction: Pe11co Construction lnc Gary Merlirro Construction:Co
Bid Date Wednesday July 2f1 20f05 2 30 PM
L ttmate 5188 NW Sammamish Rd 23105 58th Ave. YY 9125 10th Ave. S
>=ngineer. Robert LoGhmdlerssaquaki WA 98027 M4unttalieTerrace, WA.98943 Seattle, WA 981.08
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
Type 2
63 8120007083 Chain Link Fence Type 3 360.00 LF
64 8120007104 Double 20 Ft. Chain Link 1.00 EA
Gate
5.00
1,800.00
15.00
5,400.00
14.00
5,040.00
12.00
4,320.00
900.00
900.00
1,330.00
1,330.00
1,250.00
1,250.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
65 8120000004 End Gate, Comer, And Pull 11.00 EA
Post For Chain Link Fence
900.00
9,900.00
150.00
1,650.00
140.00
1,540.00
120.00
1,320.00
66 8140007055 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 270.00SY
25.00
6,750.00
38.00
10,260.00
40.75
11,002.50
45.00
12,150.00
67 8140067058 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 8.00EA
Ramp Type 2A
1,000.00
8,000.00
1,170.00
9,360.00
990.00
7,920.00
1,200.00
9,600.00
68 8140000020 Cement Conc, Sidewalk 5.00 EA
Ramp Type 4A
1,000.00
5,000.00
960.00
4,800.00
1,150.00
5,750.00
1,200.00
6,000.00
69 8140000021 Modified Cement Conc. 2.00 EA
Sidewalk Ramp Type 4A
1,000.00
2,000.00
2,300.00
4,600.00
1,400.00
2,800.00
1,200.00
2,400.00
70 82000169001 Traffic Signal System - SR 1.00 LS
169/Cedar Park Entrance
117,000.00
117,000.00
156,800.00
156,800.00
148,000.00
148,000,00
130,000.00
130,000.00
71 8200016902 Traffic Signal System 1.00 LS
Modification SR169/Shari's
Driveway
1,000.00
1,000.00
4,300.00
4,300.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
4,000.00
72 8200000034 Casing 100.00 LF
20.00
2,000.00
80.00
8,000.00
76.00
7,600.00
100.00
10,000.00
73 8200000101 Traffic Signal Interconnect 1.00 LS
System
2,000.00
2,000.00
8,300.00
8,300.00
7,800.00
7,800.00
7,000.00
7,000.00
74 8200006905 Illumination System No. 1 1.00 LS
38,500.00
38,500.00
49,500.00
49,500.00
46,600.00
46,600.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
75 82000PSEOI Install Power Conduit 1,120.00 LF
5.00
6,600.00
10.00
11,200.00
8.75
9,800.00
25.0 01
28,000.00
76 82000PSE02 Install PSE Power Vault 1.00 EA
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,900.00
1,900.00
1,750.00
1,750.00
6,000,00
6,000.00
77 82000PSE03 Install PSE Large Power 2.00 EA
Vault
4,000.00
8,000.00
4,300.00
8,600.00
4,100.00
8,200.00
7,000.00
1
14,000.00
78 8210006890 Permanent Signing 1.00 LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,700.00
1,700.00
1,600.00
1,600.00
5,000.00
5,000,00
79 8220206806 Paint Line ( 320.00 LF
0.50
160.00
1.00
320.00
0.87
278.40
1.00
320.00
80 8220006807 Plastic Line 100.00 LF
2.00
200.00
3.00
300.00
2.33
233.00
2.00
200.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller :: '
Generated by a Sharpe So/fware Product
7121;2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 5 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract.No.: Engineer's Sanders General Construc*66 Peltco Construction, Inc. Gary Merlin Construction Co.
..
Bid Date Wednesday July 2Q, 2005 2 30 PM Estimate 5188 NW Sammam.ish Rd 23105 58th Aye::41t 9125 10th Ave. S
Engineer, Robert Lachnlliler » I§saquah;' W.A>9.8027 Mountlake Totace, WA 98043 Seattle, WA 98108
ITEM
ITEM CODE
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
81
822C006859
Plastic Stop Line
130.00 LF
5.00
650.00
4,00
520.00
3.50
2.00
` 455.00
j 1,700.00
3.00
2.00
390.00
1.700.00
82 8220006857 Plastic Crosswalk Line 850.00 SF
5.00
4,250.00
2,00 1,700.00
83
84
8220006833
824000 C.
Plastic Traffic Arrow
Gravity Block Wall
2.00 EA
90.00 SF
50.00
100.00
2,250.00
65.00
16.00,
130.00
1,440.00
58.25
116.50
50.00
30.00
1 C0.00
2,700.00
25.00
20.00
1,800.00
85
825000001
Glare Screen, Type 2
350.00 LF
5.00
15.00
1,750.00
56.00i
19,600.00
52.40
18,340.00
1,840.00
50.00
2.00
17,500,00
640.00
86 8320000001 Construction Geotextile For 320.O0 SY
Underground Drainage
4,800.00
2.501 800.00
5.75
87
835COCO001
Water Quality Vault
1.00 LS
67,000.00
57,000.00
132,000.00!
132,000.00
116,440.00
116,440.00
150,000.00
160,000.00
Sub -Total:
842, 287.00
972,213.001
974,149.60
1,020,267.0
Grand Total:
842,287.00
972,213.00
974,149.60
1,020,267.00
Total Bid:
842,287.00
972,213.00
972,148.60
1,020,267.00
Alternate Total:
972,213.00
974,149.60
1,020,267.00
Calc/Entered Bid Diff.:
2,001.00
Difference from Low Vendor:
1,936.60
48,054.00
Total Subcontractors:
Run By: Rob Lochmiller `- Generated by a Sharpe Soltware Product
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 6 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No Engineer`s Westwater Gonsiruciian GampanY Trimaxx Construction; InC,
Bid Da# Wednesday July 2Ct 2005 2 30 PM Estimate.: ` 31833 Kent Black Diamond Rd
1023 Alderwood Lane
Engineer. RoberttaGhmiller Auburn WA98092 Sedro-Wooley, WA 98284
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
01 1040001319 Minor Change 1.00 CALC
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
02 1040011002 Final Cleanup 1.00 LS
2,000.00
2,000.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
22,000.00
22,000.00
03_ 1070007736 SPCC Plan 1.00 LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
22,000.00
22,000.00
04 1050000001 Contractor Supplied 1.00 LS
Surveying
15,000.00
15,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
700.00
700.00
05 1090000001 Mobilization 1.00 LS
74,600.00
74,600.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
70,000.00
70,000.00
06 1100020001 Traffic Control (1-10) 1.00 LS
2,000.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
6,500.00
6,500.00
07 1100050001 Sequential Arrow Sign 360.00HR
3.00
1,080.00
3.00
1,080.00
60.00
21,600.00
08 1100006972 Traffic Control Supervisor 580.00 HR
40.00
23,200.00
41.00
23,780.00
48.00
27,840.00
09 1100050002 Traffic Control Labor 580.0OHR
36.00
20,880.00
39.00
22,620.00
45.00
26,100.00
10 2010006001 Roadside Cleanup 1.00 FA
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
11 2020005001 Removal Of Structure And 1.00 LS
_ Obstruction
20,250.00
20,260.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
12 2020005002 Remove Catch Basin 1.00 EA
500.00
500.00
200.00
200.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
13 2020000078 Remove Existing Fence 220.00LF
4.00
880.00
6.00
1,100.00
15.00
3,300.00
14 2030000310 Roadway Excavation Incl. 920.00 Cy
Haul
25.00
23,000.00
22.00
20,240.00
54.00
49,680.00
15 2030005001 Gravel Borrow Incl. Haul 3,220.00 TON
18.00
57,960.00
17.00
54,740.00
24.00
77,280.00
16 2030000350 Unsuitable Foundation 50.00 CY
Excavation Including Haul
25.00
1,250.00
23.00
1,150.00
30.00
1,500.00
17 2090007006 Structural Excavation Class 110.000Y
Inc. Haul
15.00
1,650.00
14.00
1,540.00
60.00
6,600.00
18 2090008001 Shoring Or Extra Excavation 2,380.00 SF
Class B
1.60
3,570.00
1.00
2,380.00
4.00
9,520.00
19 2100001030 Ditch Excavation Incl. Haul 12.00 Cy
25.00
300.00
75.00
900.00
200.00
2,400.00
20 4040000003 Crushed Surfacing Base 770.00 TON
Course
25.00
19,250.00
12.00
9,240.00
28.00
21,560.00
21 4040005120 Crushed Surfacing Top 70.00TON
25.00
1,750.00
18.00
1,260.00
50.00
3,500.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller
;:,.i; Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7,21;2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 7 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No.: EngllteeY's. Westwater Construction Company Trirnajb Construction, Inc
Bid Dane: Wednesday .. ty 26 2005 ; 2 30 PM Estim.afe 31833 Kent Black Diamond Rd . 1023 Alde.rwood Lane
Engineer: RaberE LochmiUer Auburn WASS092 Sedro-Wooley, WA O8294..
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Course
22 5040000114 HMA Cl. 1/2 In. PG 64-22 520.00TON
85.00
44,200.00
60.001 31,200.00
81.00
42,120.00
23 5040000115 HMA Class 1 In. PG 64-22 710.00TON
85.00
60,350.00
50.00 35,500.00
81.00
57,510.00
24 504C000116 Job Mix Compliance Price 1.00 CALC
Adjustment
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
25 50400CC117 Compaction Price Adjustment 1.00 CALC
1.00
1.00
1.00, 1.00
1.00
1.00
26 610CCC0001 Concrete Barrier Type A 190.00 LF
56.00
10,460.00
100.00� 19,000.00
200.00
38,000.00
27 6130000001 Structural Earth Wall 1,150.00SF
25.00
28,750,00
46.001 52,900.00
40.00
46,000.00
28 6130000002 Backfill For Structural Earl 210.00 CY
_ Wall Incl. Haul
35.00
7,350.00
32.001 6,720.00
50.00
10,500.00
j
29 701C001160 Underdrain Pipe 6" Diameter 200.00 LF
15.00
3,000.00
10.00' 2,000.00
19.00
3,800.00
30 7010007014 Gravel Backfill for Drains 155.00 CY
35.00
5,425.00
15.00 2,325.00
54.00
8,370.00
31 704CO00002 HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe 12 470.00 LF
In. Diam.
32,001
15,040.00
70.00 32,900.00
55.00
25,850.00
32 704000NC3 Ductile Iron Pipe 12 In. Dia 85.00 LF
33 7" 5CO03091 Catch Basin Type 1 12.00 EA
50,00
4,250.00
80.00" 6,800.00
80.00
1,500.00
6,800.00
18,000.00
�-
I
1,200.00
14,400,00
1,000.00 I 12,000.00
34 7050000013 Adjust Existing Manhole 3.00 EA
500.00
1,500.00
700.00 2,100.00
600.00
1,800.00
35 705CO00012 Adjust Existing Catch Basin 2.00 EA
500.00
1,000.00
400.00 800.00
550.00
1,100.00
36 7050000034 Connection To Drainage 1.00 EA
Structure
500.00
500.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
37 7120000002 Adjust Existing Valve Box To 3.00 EA
Grade
300.00
900.00
200.00: 600.00
500.00
1,500.00
38 8010006403 ESC Lead 60.00DAYS
150.001
9,000.00
100.00' 6,000.00
20.00
1,200.00
39 801COC6471 Inlet Protection 33.00 EA
100.00
3,300.00
60.00 1,980.00
100.00
3,300.00
40 80100000O2 Straw Bale 78.00 EA
25.00`
1,950.00
25.00 1,950.00
100.00
7,800.00
41 801COC6490 Erosion/Water Pollution 1.00 FA
` Control
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00 3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
42 8010000003 Silt Fence 530.00 LF
6.00
3,180.00
7.00; 3,710.00
5.00
2,650.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller `?'"°
Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 8 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No EClitt@ewg WestwaterCons#rucUonC.ompany TelmaXX ConstruCticn InC
Bid Dake V1f ednesday JuEy 2Q 2005 2 3..0 PM Estimate 31a.33 Kent Btack Diamond Hd ' 1Q23 Alderwood Lane
Engineer RaberE.t achmdler Auburn WA98b:92 Sedro-Woaley, WQ 982134
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
43 8020000001 Property Restoration 1.00 FA
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
44 8020006414 Seeding, Fertilizing, and 0.10ACRE
Mulching
2,000.00
200.00
2,000.00
200.00
10,000.00
1,000.00
45 8086319552 PSIPE Superform Maple (2" 2.00 EA
Cal.)
275.00
650.00
300.00
600.00
100.00
200.00
46 8085690552 PSIPE Arnold Promise 8.00 EA
Witchhazel (5gal.)
45.00
360.00
50.00
400.00
20.00
160.00
47 8086318552 PSIPE Stella D'Oro Daylily 620.00 EA
8.00
4,960.00
10.00
6,200.00
10.00
61200.00
48 8086944552 PSIPE Emerald Green 40.00 EA
Arborvitae
50.00
2,000.00
30.00
1,200.00
20.00
800.00
49 8085942552 PSIPE Dwarf Strawberry Tree 18.00 EA
(5 Gal.)
50.00
900.00
30.00,
540.00
20.00
360.00
50 8085697562 PSIPE Barren Strawberry (1 1,239.00 EA
Gal.)
8.00
9,912.00
10.00
12,390.00
10.00
12,390.00
51 8085769652 PSIPE Kinnikinnick (1 Gal.) 184.00EA
7.00
1,288.00
10.00
1,840.00
10.00
1,840.00
52 8020006581 Bark Mulch 28.000Y
45.00
1,260.00
40.001
1,120.00
60.00
1,680.00
53 8020006555 Sod Installation 11.00 SY
9.00
99.00
2.5.001
275.00
50.00
550.00
54 8020006405 Top Soil Type A 144.00 Cy
45.00
6,480.00
25.00
3,600.00
85.00
12,240.00
55 8020006410 Topsoil Type B 230.00 Cy
45.00
10,350.00
20.00
4,600.00
35.00
8,050.00
56 8030000003 Irrigation System 1.00 LS
7,000.00
7,000.00
22,000.00
22,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
57 8030000004 Restoration Of Existing 1.00 FA
Irrigation System
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
5,000.00
58 8040000001 Cement Conc. Traffic Curb 910.00 LF
And Gutter
15.00
13,650.00
21.00
19,110.00
19.00
17,290.00
59 8040000002 Cement Conc. Traffic Curb 180.00 LF
6.00
1,080.00
23.00
4,140.00
20.00
3,600.00
60 8040000003 Extruded Curb 330.00 LF
4.00
1,320.00
5.00
1,650.00
6.00
1,980.00
61 8090006882 Raised Pavement Marker, 2.00 HUND
Type 1
300.00
600.00
150.00
300.00
260.00
520.00
62 8090006884 Raised Pavement Markers 2.00HUND
500.00
1,000.00
300.00
600.00
400.00
800.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller "::.
;,:;;,•,, Generated by a Sharpe Soltware Product
7/21/2005 City of Renton - Transportation Page 9 of 10
1:40 pm Bid Results Analysis
Project 100
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract fVo Engineer.'s; Westwater Cons niciron Gampaay Trfmau Constructtan Inc
Bid Data Wednesday July 2f} 2015 2 30, PM
....
E.s..trmaie.: 3183.3 Kertt B[,ack �fam4nd Rd 1023 AIderWood Lane
Engineer Robert Lachm111er Auburn ilVA98b:92 . Sedro-Woaley, WA 0284
ITEM ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
Type 2
63 8120007083 Chain Link Fence Type 3 360.00 LF
5.00
1,800.00
14.00
5,040.00
30.00
10,800.00
64 8120007104 Double 20 Ft. Chain Link 1.00 EA
Gate
900.00
900.00
1,200.001
1,200.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
65 8120000004 End Gate, Comer, And Pull 11.00 EA
Post For Chain Link Fence
900.00
9,900.00
125.001
1,375.00
250.00
2,750.00
66 8140007055 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 270.00 SY
25.00
6,750.00
51.00
13,770.00
41.00
11,070.00
67 8140067058 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 8.00 EA
Ramp Type 2A
1,000.00
8,000.00
1,200.00
9,600.00
1,800.00
14,400.00
68 8140000020 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 5.00 EA
Ramp Type 4A
1,000.00
5,000.00
800.00
4,000.00
1,400.00
7,000.00
69 8140000021 Modified Cement Conc. 2.00 EA
Sidewalk Ramp Type 4A
1,000.00
2,000.00
800.00
1,600.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
70 82000169001 Traffic Signal System - SR 1.00 LS
169/Cedar Park Entrance
117,000.00
117,000.00
156,000.00I
156,000.00
150,000.00
160,000.00
71 8200016902 Traffic Signal System 1.00 LS
Modification SR169/Shari's
Driveway
1,000.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,200.00
3,200.00
72 8200000034 Casing 100.00 LF
20.00
2,000.00
50.00
5,000.00
60.00
6,000.00
73 8200000101 Traffic Signal Interconnect 1.00 LS
System
2,000.00
2,000.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
9,200.00
9,200.00
74 8200006905 Illumination System No. 1 1.00 LS
38,500.00
38,500.00
50,000.00
50,000.00
55,250.00
55,250.00
75 82000PSE01 Install Power Conduit 1,120.00 LF
5.00
6,600.00
20.00
22,400.00
22.00
24,640.00
76 82000PSE02 Install PSE Power Vault 1.00 EA
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
1,600.00
1,600.00
77 82000PSE03 Install PSE Large Power 2.00 EA
Vault
4,000.00
8,000.00
6,000.00
12,000.00
6,200.00
12,400.00
78 8210006890 Permanent Signing 1.00 LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
2,200.%
2,200.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
79 8220206806 Paint Line ( 320.00 LF
0.50
160.00
1.001
320.00
1.50
480.00
80 8220006807 Plastic Line 100,00 LF
2.00
200.00
2.00
200.00
2.60
260.00
Run By: Rob Lochmiller r Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
7/21 /2005
1:40 pm
Project 100
City of Renton - Transportation
Bid Results Analysis
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements: Phase
Contract No EnglnBer's Westuua;erGonsttuct'ion GampanY:; Trltnaoc Constrttotlon lnC
Sid Da..te Wednesdajr July 2i} 2005 2 30 PM Estimate 31033 Kent Black Namcnd Rd 10�3 Aldernrood Lane
Engineer Robert Lochmiller Auburn WA984:92 Sedro Woaley, WA 98284
Page 10 of 10
ITEM
ITEM CODE
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
81
8220006859
Plastic Stop Line
130.00 LF
5.00
650.00
4.00
520.00
4.50
585.00
82
8220006857
Plastic Crosswalk Line
850.00 SF
5.00
4,250.00
2.00
1,700.00
2.60
2,210.00
83
8220006833
Plastic Traffic Arrow
2.00 EA
50.00
100.00
60.00
120.00
130.00
260.00
84
8240000001
Gravity Block Wall
90.00SF
25.00
2,250.00
15.00
1,350.00
20.00
1,800.00
85
8250000001
Glare Screen, Type 2
350.00 LF
5.00
1,750.00
50.00
17,500.00
58.50
20,475.00
86
8320000001
Construction Geotextile For
Underground Drainage
320.00SY
15.00
4,800.00
2.00
640.00
5.00
1,600.00
87
8350000001
Water Quality Vault
1.00 LS
57,000.00
57,000.00
140,000.00
140,000.00
209,400.00
209,400.00
Grand Total:
842,287.00
1,069,518.00
1,328,823.00
Total Bid:
842,287.00
1,069,518.00
1,328,823.00
Alternate Total:
1,069,518.00
1,328,823.00
Calc/Entered Bid Diff.:
Difference from Low Vendor:
356,610.00
Total Subcontractors:
Run By: Rob Lochmiller
i. - Generated by a Sharpe Software Product
ORDINANCE NO. 5134
Transportation Capital Fund
Attachment A
Protect
Proposed
TIP
Project Title
Number
2005 Budget
Change
2005 Budget
Co nment
Additional funding needs f 2M
1
Street Overlay Progran
317.012108
$ 405,000
$ 300,000
$ 705,000
budget. See Note 1.
2
SR 167/SW 27th StfStrander By
317.012138
10,000
51000
5,000
Reduced request $SAW for 2005.
Completes 30% design for entire
project. Recent federal award of
3a
Strander Bv/SW 27th St Comect.
317.012239
800,000
10,000
810,000
$750,000. See Note 2.
Complete final design for Ph. 1.
3b
Strander Bv, Phase 1, Segment.1 •
317.012239
210,000
210,000
Segment 1. See Nole 2.
TE and Metro mitigation funding.
Construd Ph 1 in 2005. Prepare PSSE
padrage for Ph 2 with possible
additional design ($1W4 due to
4
SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900
317.012175
10,000
1,107,800
1,117,800
Madenance facility. See Note 3.
6
Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH)
317.012163
5,000
-
5,000
Same as 2005 budget.
6
Transit Progrun
317.012109
20.400
-
20,400
Sane as Zoos budget.
$12 000 for additional watt rer�irea b
coonfituft with Sound Transit and for
7
Ralyder Av Corridor StLodyf knprov.
317.012193
20,000
63,100
83,100
additional project needs.
Reduced $305,100 from 2005 budget;
report, public outreach. consultant
8
NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor
317.012176
315,300
305,300
10,000
fuel project.
t:166,000 Metro rtritipatiat funding for
M*Wiood added. See
9
Walkway ram
317.000009
236,6W
263,400
500,000
dote 4.
New developer. Site plan being
developed. Rough estrntale to complete
10
S Lake Wash. Roadway knproy.
317.012306
-
1,100.000
1.100,000
100% desigm See. Nole 5.
11
SR 169 Corridor Study
317.012401
50,000
-
50,000
Same as.Z005 bindget.
Construction was underfunded; new
construction estimate; Ywkides $60.000
12
South Renton Project
317.012194
18,200
246,8W
285,000
reserve; includes rallroad cost
13
1-405 hn In Renton
317.012210
30.000
-
30,000
same as zoos budget.
14
Project DeveloprnaWPredesign
317.012150
175,000
-
175,000
Same as 2005 budget.
Same as 2005 budget. Potential need
15
NE 4th tdam Av NE
317.012209
344,9W
-
344,900
for use at project bid.
16
Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI
317.012308
5W 000
265,000
320,000
Reduced request for 2005.
-
TB funding. Construction 2005.
Project scope n Kkmd to coordinate
17
Benson Rd - S 26th to Maki
317.012309
459,400
244,000
215,400
WSDOT rnickel project
16
Arterial Circulation Progrun
317.000029
200,000
-
200,000
Same as 2005 budget
Bridge bapectbns 9ft year, bad rate
Waft Ave. Bridge, prepare May Creek
19
Brtdge inspection A Rqxdr
317.000106
40,000
6,300
46,300
BRAG application.
For project conupletiort. Funding
20
Loop Replitioment Program
317.000016
20,000
12,000
32,000
needed for 2004 bill still pending.
21
Sign ram
317.012113
7,5W
-
7,5W
Same as 2005
22
Pole ram
317.000091
25,000
-
25,000
Same as 2005 budget.
23
Sound Transit HOV Direct Access
317.012171
10,000
-
10,000
same as 2005 budget.
24
Trafltc ram
317.012115
80,000
40,000
40,000
Reduced W,000 in 2005.
25
Traffic Efficiency Program
317.012162
251,9W
-
251,9W
same as 2005 budget.
26
COD Bike & Pod. Connections
317.012185
50.000
200
49 8W
Finish upgrading all ramps•
27
Arterial Rehab. Prog.
317.012186
195,000
-
195,000
Average eogerrddu a on p1oorm-
28
Duval Ave NE
317.012123
1,2W,700
408.700
850.000
Deler additional cods to 2006.
Federal HES grant o/6396,000.
cod esrKnate krcrease.
Oft will detwn*w aclud oorrstrimll°"
29
SunseUDuvwX inbersecdon
317.012301
381,000
437,700
818,700
funding needs.
30
RR Crossing Safety Prog.
317.0121661
5,000
-
5,000
Same as 2005 budget.
31
TDM Prouram
317.0121351
64,200
-
64 200
Same as 2005 budget -
Same as 2005 budget: update LOS
r32Trans
qTcurrenc
317.012107
40,000
-
40,000
program-
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Cedar River Park Access Improvements; CAG-05-098
DATE: July 20, 2005
FORMS
Non-
Mini -
BIDDER
Bid
Colin-
Anti-
mum
Sub
BID
Bond
sion
Trust
Wage
List
EEO
Gary Merlino Const. Co., Inc.
X
X
X
X
X
$1,020,267.00
9125 10th Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98108
Gary Merlino
Pellco Construction, Inc.
X
X
X
X
X
X
23105 58th Ave. W.
$974,149.60
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
Michael J. Pellitteri
Sanders General Construction
X
X
X
X
X
X
$972,213.00
5188 NW Sammamish Rd.
Issaquah, WA 98027
Allen Sanders
Trimaxx Construction, Inc.
X
X
X
X
X
X
$1,328,823.00
1023 Alderwood Lane
Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284
Tockl Snyder
Westwater Construction Co.
X
X
X
X
X
X
$1,069,518.00
31833 Kent Black Diamond Rd.
Auburn, WA 98092
Thomas J. Caplis
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
TOTAL: $842,287.00
*corrected
LEGEND:
EEO: Certification of Equal Employment Opportunity Report; Sub List: Subcontractor List
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al N:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: August 1, 2005
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, City Clerk (x6502)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Annual certification of State Highway Routes within
Correspondence..
the Renton city limits
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
• WSDOT Letter 7/1/2005, with listings of Non-
Limited Access Routes and Limited Access Routes
Study Sessions......
Information......... X
• Chapter 47.24 RCW
Other .......................
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Information Finance Dept ......
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Transportation Data Office,
has assumed responsibility for the annual identification of State Highway Routes within the
limits of incorporated cities and towns, pursuant to RCW 47.24.010, and reports the
identification of highway routes in Renton as of July 1, 2005 as follows:
Unlimited Access highway routes:
State Route No. 167
State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway
State Route No. 515 beginning on Benson Drive
State Route No. 900 beginning on Sunset Boulevard
State Route No. 900 Couplet (CO2NDST) on Bronson Way
Limited Access highway routes:
State Route No. 167
State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway
State Route No. 405
State Route No. 900 beginning on NE Park Dr.
The statewide identification document is on file in the City Clerk office.
cc: Gregg Zimmerman; Sandra Meyer
Washington State
v7AW Department of 'transportation
Douglas B. MacDonald
Secretary of Transportation
July 1, 2005
City or Town Clerk:
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
P.O. Box 47300
Olympia, WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
TTY: 1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 1 3 2005
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
The attached annual identification of State Highway Routes within the limits of
incorporated cities and towns is made pursuant to RCW 47.24.010, which requires that
the Washington State Department of Transportation identify, by brief description, all city
streets that shall form parts of state highway routes. Based upon this identification,
jurisdiction, control, and maintenance of city streets that form parts of state highway
routes are governed by RCW 47.24.020. The identifications provided are as follows:
Limited Access Routes
2. Non -Limited Access Routes
The identifications provided are for city streets that form part of state highway routes as
of July 1, 2005.
The process of identifying city streets that form part of state highway routes within
incorporated areas has not been conducted since 1994. Recently, the Transportation Data
Office has assumed the responsibility for this annual identification process. If you find
any errors while reviewing these documents, or if you have any questions or comments,
please contact Lou Baker at (360) 570-2361.
Sincerely,
< 0r 4 9 �<'41 �0 7 -
Roger E. Horton, P.E., General Manager
Transportation Data Office
Strategic Planning & Programming
Attachments
Washington State Department of Transportation
Transportation Data Office
PO Box 47380
Olympia, WA 98504-7830
Identification of City Streets that Form Parts of State Highway Routes
(Non -Limited Access Facilities)
Within the Limits of Incorporated Cities and Towns
Pursuant to RCW 47.24.010
July 1, 2005
To the clerk of Each City and Town Affected:
The Secretary of Transportation hereby notifies cities and towns that the herein identified city streets
form parts of state non -limited access highway routes pursuant to RCW 47.24.010. Based upon these
identifications, jurisdiction, control, and maintenance of these city streets are governed by RCW
47.24.020. As of 7/l/2005, the city streets that form parts of state non -limited access highway routes are
as follows:
Renton State Route No. 167 — From S Grady Way (Milepost 26.48) northeasterly to end
of route (Milepost 27.28) near Harris Street.
State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway — From Corporate Limits
(Milepost 23.36) near 131" Avenue SE westerly and northwesterly to Milepost
25.15.
State Route No. 515 beginning on Benson Drive — From Corporate Limits
(Milepost 5.73) 0.26 miles north of SE 172"a Street, northerly via Benson Drive;
thence via Talbott Road; thence via S Grady Street; thence via Main Avenue S to
end of route (Milepost 7.82) at Jct. SR 900 Couplet (CO2NDST).
State Route No. 900 beginning on Sunset Boulevard — From the vicinity of South
135`h Street (Milepost 8.48) easterly via Sunset Boulevard; thence via S Third
Street; thence via Houser Way; thence via Mill Avenue SW; thence via Bronson
Way S; thence via Sunset Boulevard N to the vicinity of SR 405 (Milepost 11.55);
also, from Milepost 13.05 near Kirkland Avenue NE easterly via Sunset
Boulevard NE; thence via Renton -Issaquah Avenue to the vicinity of 142"a
Avenue SE (Milepost 14.73). Note: State Route No. 900 is coincident with SR
405 from Milepost 11.55 to Milepost 12.50.
State Route No. 900 Couplet (CO2NDST) on Bronson Way — From beginning of
couplet (Milepost 10.71) at Mill Avenue westerly via Bronson Way; thence'via
2na Street to end of couplet (Milepost 11.40) at Rainier Avenue S.
Washington State Department of Transportation
Transportation Data Office
PO Box 47380
Olympia, WA 98504-7380
Identification of City Streets that Form Parts of State Highway Routes
(Limited Access Facilities)
Within th! Limits of Incorporated Cities and Towns
Pursuant to RCW 47.24.010
July 1, 2005
To the clerk of Each City and Town Affected:
The Secretary of Transportation hereby notifies, pursuant to RCW 47.24.010, cities and towns that the
herein identified city streets form parts of state limited access highway routes. These identified facilities
are vested in the state, and notwithstanding any provision of RCW 47.24.020 to the contrary, the
Washington State Department of Transportation exercises full jurisdiction, responsibility and control
over these limited access facilities. As of July 1, 2005, city streets that form parts of state limited access
highway routes that have been constructed and are operational are as follows:
Renton State Route No. 167 — South Corporate Limits (Milepost 24.43) at E Valley Road
northerly to S Grady Way (Milepost 26.48).
State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway — From Milepost 25.15 westerly to
end of route (Milepost 25.26) at Jct. SR 900.
State Route No. 405 — West Corporate Limits (Milepost 1.19) at Tukwila, near
Jct. SR 181, easterly and northerly to North Corporate Limits (Milepost 7.99) in
the vicinity of NE 44`h Street.
State Route No. 900 beginning on NE Park Drive — From Jct. SR 405 (Milepost
12.50) easterly via NE Park Drive; thence via Sunset Boulevard NE to Milepost
13.05 near Kirkland Avenue.
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 1 of 6
Chapter 47.24 RCW
CITY STREETS AS PART OF STATE HIGHWAYS
RCW SECTIONS
47.24.010 Designation -- Construction, maintenance -- Return to city or town.
47.24.020 Jurisdiction, control.
47.24.030 Acquisition of rights of way -- Condemnation proceedings.
47.24.040 Street fund -- Expenditures on streets forming part of state highway.
47.24.050 Aid on streets by state or county -- Payment.
NOTES:
City streets
parkways, boulevards, generally: Title 35 RCW.
sidewalks, etc.: Chapters 35.68 through 35.79 RCW.
Design standards committee for city streets: Chapter 35.78 RCW.
Off-street parking
cities: Chapter 35.86 RCW.
towns: RCW 35.27.550 through 35.27.590.
Platted streets as public highways: RCW 58.08.035, 58.08.050.
Speed limits in cities: RCW 46.61.415, 46.61.430, 46.61.440.
Viaducts, bridges, elevated roadways, tunnels, etc., in cities: Chapter 35.85 RCW.
RCW 47.24.010
Designation -- Construction, maintenance -- Return to city or town.
The transportation commission shall determine what streets, together with bridges thereon and
wharves necessary for use for ferriage of motor vehicle traffic in connection with such streets, if any,
in any incorporated cities and towns shall form a part of the route of state highways and between the
first and fifteenth days of July of any year the department of transportation shall identify by brief
description, the streets, together with the bridges thereon and wharves, if any, in such city or town
which are designated as forming a part of the route of any state highway; and all such streets,
including curbs and gutters and street intersections and such bridges and wharves, shall thereafter be
a part of the state highway system and as such shall be constructed and maintained by the department
of transportation from any state funds available therefor: PROVIDED, That the responsibility for the
construction and maintenance of any such street together with its appurtenances may be returned to a
city or a town upon certification by the department of transportation to the clerk of any city or town
that such street, or portion thereof, is no longer required as a part of the state highway system:
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm?fuseaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 2 of 6
PROVIDED FURTHER, That any such certification that a street, or portion thereof, is no longer
required as a part of the state highway system shall be made between the first and fifteenth of July
following the determination by the department that such street or portion thereof is no longer required
as a part of the state highway system, but this shall not prevent the department and any city or town
from entering into an agreement that a city or town will accept responsibility for such a street or
portion thereof at some time other than between the first and fifteenth of July of any year.
[1998 c 245 § 97; 1979 ex.s. c 86 § 2; 1977 ex.s. c 151 § 57; 1973 c 95 § 3; 1961 c 13 § 47.24.010. Prior: 1959 c 160 § 1;
1957 c 83 § 2; 1955 c 179 § 2; 1949 c 220 § 5, part; 1945 c 250 § 1, part; 1943 c 82 § 10, part; 1937 c 187 § 61, part;
Rem. Supp. 1949 § 6450-61, part.]
NOTES:
Severability -- 1979 ex.s. c 86: See note following RCW 13.24.040.
RCW 47.24.020
Jurisdiction, control.
The jurisdiction, control, and duty of the state and city or town with respect to such streets is as
follows:
(1) The department has no authority to change or establish any grade of any such street without
approval of the governing body of such city or town, except with respect to limited access facilities
established by the commission;
(2) The city or town shall exercise full responsibility for and control over any such street beyond
the curbs and if no curb is installed, beyond that portion of the highway used for highway purposes.
However, within incorporated cities and towns the title to a state limited access highway vests in the
state, and, notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the department shall exercise full
jurisdiction, responsibility, and control to and over such facility as provided in chapter 47.52 RCW;
(3) The department has authority to prohibit the suspension of signs, banners, or decorations above
the portion of such street between the curbs or portion used for highway purposes up to a vertical
height of twenty feet above the surface of the roadway;
(4) The city or town shall at its own expense maintain all underground facilities in such streets,
and has the right to construct such additional underground facilities as may be necessary in such
streets. However, pavement trenching and restoration performed as part of installation of such
facilities must meet or exceed requirements established by the department;
(5) The city or town has the right to grant the privilege to open the surface of any such street, but
all damage occasioned thereby shall promptly be repaired either by the city or town itself or at its
direction. Pavement trenching and restoration performed under a privilege granted by the city under
this subsection must meet or exceed requirements established by the department;
(6) The city or town at its own expense shall provide street illumination and shall clean all such
streets, including storm sewer inlets and catch basins, and remove all snow, except that the state shall
when necessary plow the snow on the roadway. In cities and towns having a population of twenty-two
thousand five hundred or less according to the latest determination of population by the office of
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm'?fubeaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 3 of 6
financial management, the state, when necessary for public safety, shall assume, at its expense,
responsibility for the stability of the slopes of cuts and fills and the embankments within the right of
way to protect the roadway itself. When the population of a city or town first exceeds twenty-two
thousand five hundred according to the determination of population by the office of financial
management, the city or town shall have three years from the date of the determination to plan for
additional staffing, budgetary, and equipment requirements before being required to assume the
responsibilities under this subsection. The state shall install, maintain, and operate all illuminating
facilities on any limited access facility, together with its interchanges, located within the corporate
limits of any city or town, and shall assume and pay the costs of all such installation, maintenance,
and operation incurred after November 1, 1954;
(7) The department has the right to use all storm sewers on such highways without cost; and if
new storm sewer facilities are necessary in construction of new streets by the department, the cost of
the facilities shall be borne by the state and/or city as may be mutually agreed upon between the
department and the governing body of the city or town;
(8) Cities and towns have exclusive right to grant franchises not in conflict with state laws and
rules, over, beneath, and upon such streets, but the department is authorized to enforce in an action
brought in the name of the state any condition of any franchise which a city or town has granted on
such street. No franchise for transportation of passengers in motor vehicles may be granted on such
streets without the approval of the department, but the department shall not refuse to approve such
franchise unless another street conveniently located and of strength of construction to sustain travel of
such vehicles is accessible;
(9) Every franchise or permit granted any person by a city or town for use of any portion of such
street by a public utility must require the grantee or permittee to restore, repair, and replace any
portion of the street damaged or injured by it to conditions that meet or exceed requirements
established by the department;
(10) The city or town has the right to issue overload or overwidth permits for vehicles to operate
on such streets or roads subject to regulations printed and distributed to the cities and towns by the
department;
(11) Cities and towns shall regulate and enforce all traffic and parking restrictions on such streets,
but all regulations adopted by a city or town relating to speed, parking, and traffic control devices on
such streets not identical to state law relating thereto are subject to the approval of the department
before becoming effective. All regulations pertaining to speed, parking, and traffic control devices
relating to such streets heretofore adopted by a city or town not identical with state laws shall become
null and void unless approved by the department heretofore or within one year after March 21, 1963;
(12) The department shall erect, control, and maintain at state expense all route markers and
directional signs, except street signs, on such streets;
(13) The department shall install, operate, maintain, and control at state expense all traffic control
signals, signs, and traffic control devices for the purpose of regulating both pedestrian and motor
vehicular traffic on, entering upon, or leaving state highways in cities and towns having a population
of twenty-two thousand five hundred or less according to the latest determination of population by the
office of financial management. Such cities and towns may submit to the department a plan for traffic
control signals, signs, and traffic control devices desired by them, indicating the location, nature of
installation, or type thereof, or a proposed amendment to such an existing plan or installation, and the
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm?fuseaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 4 of 6
department shall consult with the cities or towns concerning the plan before installing such signals,
signs, or devices. Cities and towns having a population in excess of twenty-two thousand five
hundred according to the latest determination of population by the office of financial management
shall install, maintain, operate, and control such signals, signs, and devices at their own expense,
subject to approval of the department for the installation and type only. When the population of a city
or town first exceeds twenty-two thousand five hundred according to the determination of population
by the office of financial management, the city or town shall have three years from the date of the
determination to plan for additional staffing, budgetary, and equipment requirements before being
required to assume the responsibilities under this subsection. For the purpose of this subsection,
striping, lane marking, and channelization are considered traffic control devices;
(14) All revenue from parking meters placed on such streets belongs to the city or town;
(15) Rights of way for such streets shall be acquired by either the city or town or by the state as
shall be mutually agreed upon. Costs of acquiring rights of way may be at the sole expense of the
state or at the expense of the city or town or at the expense of the state and the city or town as may be
mutually agreed upon. Title to all such rights of way so acquired shall vest in the city or town:
PROVIDED, That no vacation, sale, rental, or any other nontransportation use of any unused portion
of any such street may be made by the city or town without the prior written approval of the
department; and all revenue derived from sale, vacation, rental, or any nontransportation use of such
rights of way shall be shared by the city or town and the state in the same proportion as the purchase
costs were shared;
(16) If any city or town fails to perform any of its obligations as set forth in this section or in any
cooperative agreement entered into with the department for the maintenance of a city or town street
forming part of the route of a state highway, the department may notify the mayor of the city or town
to perform the necessary maintenance within thirty days. If the city or town within the thirty days fails
to perform the maintenance or fails to authorize the department to perform the maintenance as
provided by RCW 47..24.050, the department may perform the maintenance, the cost of which is to be
deducted from any sums in the motor vehicle fund credited or to be credited to the city or town.
[2001 c 201 § 8; 1993 c 126 § 1; 1991 c 342 § 52; 1987 c 68 § 1; 1984 c 7 § 150; 1977 ex.s. c 78 § 7; 1967 c 115 § 1;
1963 c 150 § 1; 1961 c 13 § 47.24.020. Prior: 1957 c 83 § 3; 1955 c 179 § 3; 1953 c 193 § 1; 1949 c 220 § 5, part; 1945
c 250 § 1, part; 1943 c 82 § 10, part; 1937 c 187 § 61, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 § 6450-61, part.]
NOTES:
Effective dates -- 1991 c 342: See note following RCW 47.26.167.
Severability -- 1984 c 7: See note following RCW 47.01.141.
RCW 47.24.030
Acquisition of rights of way -- Condemnation proceedings.
The department is authorized to acquire rights of way, by purchase, gift, or condemnation for any
such streets, highways, bridges, and wharves. Any such condemnation proceedings shall be exercised
in the manner provided by law for condemnation proceedings to acquire lands required for state
highways.
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm?fuseaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 5 of 6
[1984 c 7 § 151; 1961 c 13 § 47..24.030. Prior: 1949 c 220 § 5, part; 1945 c 250 § 1, part; 1943 c 82 § 10, part; 1937 c
187 § 61, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 § 6450-61, part.]
NOTES:
Severability -- 1984 c 7: See note following RCW 47.01.141.
Right of way donations: Chapter 47.14 RCW.
RCW 47.24.040
Street fund -- Expenditures on streets forming part of state highway.
All funds accruing to the credit of incorporated cities and towns in the motor vehicle fund shall be
paid monthly to such incorporated cities and towns and shall, by the respective cities and towns, be
placed in a fund to be designated as "city street fund" and disbursed as authorized and directed by the
legislative authority of the city or town, as agents of the state, for salaries and wages, material,
supplies, equipment, purchase or condemnation of right of way, engineering or any other proper
highway or street purpose in connection with the construction, alteration, repair, improvement or
maintenance of any city street or bridge, or viaduct or underpassage along, upon or across such
streets. Such expenditure may be made either independently or in conjunction with any federal, state
or any county funds.
[1961 c 13 § 47,24.040. Prior: 1949 c 220 § 4; 1947 c 96 § 1; 1943 c 82 § 9; 1939 c 181 § 8; 1937 c 187 § 60; Rem.
Supp. 1949 § 6450-60.1
RCW 47.24.050
Aid on streets by state or county -- Payment.
If a city or town, whether or not any of its streets are designated as forming a part of a state highway,
is unable to construct, repair, or maintain its streets for good cause, or if it is in need of engineering
assistance to construct, repair, or maintain any of its streets, it may authorize the department to
perform such construction, repair, or maintenance, or it may secure necessary engineering assistance
from the department, to the extent of the funds credited or to be credited in the motor vehicle fund for
payment to the city or town. Any sums due from a city or town for such purposes shall be paid on
vouchers approved and submitted by the department from moneys credited to the city or town in the
motor vehicle fund, and the amount of the payments shall be deducted from funds which would
otherwise be paid to the city or town from the motor vehicle fund. The department may in certain
special cases, in its discretion, enter into an agreement with the governing officials of the city or town
for the performance of such work or services, the terms of which shall provide for reimbursement of
the motor vehicle fund for the benefit of the state's share of the fund by the city or town of the cost
thereof from any funds of the city or town on hand and legally available for the work or services. The
city or town may, by resolution, authorize the legislative authority of the county in which it is located,
to perform any such construction, repair, or maintenance, and the work shall be paid for by the city or
town at the actual cost thereof as provided for payment for work performed on city streets, and any
payment received therefor by a county shall be deposited in the county road fund to be expended
under the same provisions as are imposed upon the funds used to perform the construction, repair, or
maintenance.
[ 1984 c 7 § 152; 1961 c 13 § 47.24.050.. Prior: 1951 c 54 § 1; 1949 c 220 § 6; 1943 c 82 § 11; 1937 c 187 § 63; Rem.
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm?fuseaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
RCW 47 . 24 CHAPTER
Page 6 of 6
Supp. 1949 § 6450-63.1
NOTES:
Severability -- 1984 c 7: See note following RCW 47.01.141.
http://www.leg.wa.g.../index.cfm?fuseaction=chapter&chapter=47.24&RequestTimeout=50 7/13/2005
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
[AI �
-7y
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of: August 1, 2005
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with
Correspondence..
City of Renton code for new short plats and the
Ordinance .............
Fotheringill Short Plat — LUA04-134.
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Deed of Dedication
Study Sessions......
Exhibit Map
Vicinity Map
Information.........
Administrative Report & Decision
Recommended Action:
Approvals:
Council concur
Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other. ..............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City requires a 5' x 119' (701+/- sq.ft.) strip of land to be dedicated for right-of-way along the
frontage of Duvall Ave NE as part of the conditions of the Fotheringill Short Plat (LUA04-134).
The dedication will conform with the right-of-way of the new public street, NE 1" St, constructed
as part of the adjacent Laurelhurst Plat to the west of the short plat property. Council acceptance of
said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of
Dedication.
C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\TempTotheringill SHPL 06m AGNBILL.doc
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055-3232
DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 152305900507
Project File #: LUA-04-134-SHPL Street Intersection:
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. Conner Homes Company 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page 2 )
A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY,
WASHNGTON.
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantees) as
named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. This dedication is
required as a condition for development of property.
N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Anoroved and Accented Bv:
Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton
,Ze (q�p Mayor
City Clerk
1ND117DUA L STATE OF WASHNGTON ) SS
ACKANTOH` �yi� 1 V41 COUNTY OF KING )
�5•StQ•N.�l� of I c ify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary ca `ust be lsn bo>4 Di /4% P, SupL'Ubhp('P, signed this instrument and
aOTAgy 9 : �4� acknowledged it to be his/her/their free d volunta t for e uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
r N : PUBLIC' :• 2 ;
���� ��'••,•� a.:' . % Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
9.0
II q�F •WA NNotary (Print) L,&,, all►^ S
►�������l,�.? My appointme t expires:
Dated: wrl, 2-1 v r•
04108L01 legal.doc Page 1
Project: LUA-04-134-SHPL
Exhibit A WO#
Legal Description PIDGRANTOR:
Street: Duvall Avenue S.E.
Legal Description — Right -of -Way Dedication
That portion of the north half of the north half of the southwest quarter of the southeast
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in
the City of Renton, King County, Washington described as follows:
COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said subdivision; thence N88024'19"W, along
the south line of said subdivision, 20.00 feet to the west right-of-way margin of Duvall
Avenue S.E. and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence
continuing N88024'19"W along said south line 5.00 feet to the west line of the east 25.00
feet of said subdivision; thence N00038'00"E along said west line, 119.15 feet to a point of
tangency with a 25.00 foot radius curve to the left; thence northwesterly, along said curve,
through a central angle of 38048'13", a distance of 16.93 feet to the south right-of-way
margin of N.E. 1 ST Street; thence S88022'42"E, along said south margin, 10.52 feet to the
west right-of-way margin of said Duvall Avenue S.E.; thence S00038'00"W, along said
west margin, 134.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 701 ± square feet (0.0161 ± acres).
04108L02 legal.doc Page 2
N.E. 1ST ST.
N
N N88'22'42"W
10.52
C4� TRACT U 20' LL
z `j PLAT OF LAURELHURST I V
N n VOL. 227, PG'S. 69-78
z w R=25.00 I j
V) A-=38'48'13" I w
L=16.93 I o Q
0o
1M
4J
Z O Q
N
Z
J AREA TO BE DEDICATED '_n 4 >
3 U)
5'
120' \ �,
P.O.B.I W r7
� N
I
N88'24'I9j W -147 `r
S. LINE N1/2, N1/2, SW1/4, o o
N ZN w
SE1/4, NW1/4 SEC. 15-23-5
o
I W Z
FOTHERINGILL PAGE
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
EXHIBIT 1 OF 1
14711 NE29th Place, #101
�O� Bellevue, Washington 98007
425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963
DESIGN
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING
JOB NO_ 04105
%a%LE
..r
30 q=
ANAL L[
N
1 " = 40'
iI
20' 25'
N. LINE N1 /2, N1 /2, SW1 /4,
SE1 /4, NW1/ 4 SEC. 15-23-5
N.E. 1ST ST.
v� N88'22'42"W 332.31 �F_ — — —
o; TRACT U 190.03
NI r N N88'22'42"W
10' JOINT USE —�
UTILITY EASEMENT
PER REF. 1
�Ln
N I
M
�
N
TRACT M
Z
Ln
\ U
LAURELHURST
Zcn
PHASE 1
m
VOL. 227,
w Z
PG'S 69/78
z�
W
SANITARY SEWER —�
-,SEMENT TO CITY OF RENTON
REC. N0.__________
f
3 �
GOE'S
VOL. 85,
I
�- 35.01
I
9' JOINT USE
L
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PER
REF. 1
W
o
r-
I
�
�
O
w
o
00
o I
6533t S.F.
z
05
o
o
i
I
I
140.45
-1 10.52
35.44
50.01
------
�,
W
R=25.00
9' P.D.E. SEE
A=89-00'42"
4 38'48'13"
N
ESM'T. NOTE 1,
L=38.84
L=16.93
SHEET 1
L,
Li
o
0
�r
Q
2
r7
0
n
°'
3 't
N
W
o—j
4688f S.F.
z
5495f S.F. of
4100
Q
4621
4627
5,
z
r•—�� �� 4
�� �� 6876t S.F.
121
FND 1" IRON PIPE
0.1'SE OF COR.
2
PLACE
PG'S 12/13
50.01 60.01 °' w
N88'24'19"W 110.02 O
0
0 '
5' ROAD DEDICATION TO •"'
THE CITY OF RENTON o z
REC. N0. 20'
i
165.02 ' ' V' N
L20.00\
N88'24'19'W --
_ S. LINE N1 /2, N1 /2, SW1 /4, 5.00 w
SE1 /4, NW1 /4 SEC. 15-23-5 N
W
30'
W z
S.E. 2ND ST.
(S.E. 135TH STREET)
25'
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS
1. THIS SITE IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED AS DISCLOSED BY
E6 - 10 T23N R5E W 1/2
G6 - 22 T23N R5E W 1/2
s
2®oF6
ZONING — — — — Renton City Limiib 1�R�� N 15 T23N R5E W 1/2
� �53
REPORT
City of Renton
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
&
DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A.
SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST.
REPORT DATE:
May 2, 2005
Project Name
Fotheringill Short Plat
Owners:
Connor Homes Co. Attn: John Skochdopole 846 1081h Ave. NE Bellevue, WA 98004
Jeffery Fotheringill 13409 138th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059
Applicant/Contact.
John Skochdopole of Connor Homes Co. 846 108'h Ave. NE Bellevue, WA 98004
File Number
LUA-04-134, SHPL-A
Project Manager
Susan A. Fiala, AICP
Project Description
Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for a four (4) lot subdivision of a 0.56-
acre site located in the Residential - 8 Dwelling Unit Per Acre (R-8) zone. The proposed
lots are intended for the eventual development of detached single-family homes. The lots
range in size from 4,688 sq. ft. to 6,876 sq. ft. Access is proposed via NE 1st St. and
Duvall Ave. NE.
Project Location
105 and 111 Duvall Avenue SE
,�_t_►35TH ST.
Project Location Map
4_
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 2
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.
Owners of Record.
Connor Homes Co. 846 108th Ave. NE Bellevue, WA 98004
Jeffery Fotheringill 13409 138th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059
2.
Zoning Designation:
Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8)
3.
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF)
4.
Existing Site Use:
The site has a single family residence proposed to remain on new Lot 1.
5.
Neighborhood Characteristics:
North:
Single Family Residential — Laurelhurst Plat under construction (R-8 zone)
East:
Single Family Residential - Laurelhurst Plat under construction (R-8 zone)
South:
Single Family Residential - (King County zoning)
West:
Single Family Residential - Laurelhurst Plat under construction (R-8 zone)
6.
Access:
Via SE 1st Street and Duvall Ave. NE
7.
Site Area:
24,293 square feet / 0.54 acres
C.
HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Action
Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan
N/A 5075 05/26/2004
Zoning
N/A 5075 05/26/2004
Annexation
N/A 5074 05/26/2004
Laurelhurst
Final Plat
LUA 04-160, FP N/A 04/19/2005
(# 20050419000480 -mylar)
D.
PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
Water: There is a 12-inch water main along Duvall Ave. SE (Dwg W-0943). The proposed project is
located outside the Aquifer Protection Area. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is modeled at
2500 gpm with a static pressure is approximately 71 psi. Pressure Zone is 565.
Sewer: A sewer main extension ig being installed along Duvall Ave. SE (fronting the site), as part of
the Laurelhurst Division 1 Plat. A sewer main is being installed along NE 1st St and a sewer
main is being installed along the westerly property line. There is also an 8" sewer main at
Bremerton Place NE (Dwg S-1488).
Surface Water/Storm Water: This project drains to Maplewood Creek. A storm drainage plan and
drainage report was provided. -The applicant is proposing to share the detention and water .
quality pond being installed for Laurelhurst project (adjacent to the north and west), since the
pond would accommodate the additional flow.
2. Streets: Currently there are no curb/gutter and sidewalk on Duvall Ave SE, fronting the site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 3
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards
5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family
2. Housing Element
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Proiect Description/Background
The subject land use application is vested to the R-8 development standards in effect prior to the new code of
November 10, 2004.
The applicant proposes to subdivide a 0.54-acre (24,293 square feet) site into four lots. An existing home and
associated outbuildings on the site are proposed to be removed/demolished.
Lot sizes proposed are: Lot 1 at 6,533 sq. ft.; Lot 2 at 4,688 sq. ft.; Lot 3 at 5,522 sq. ft. and Lot 4 at 6,876 sq.
ft. The proposal for eventual development of four new single family residences would arrive at a density of 7.4
dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a
maximum of 9.7 dwelling units per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size.
Lots 1, 2 and 3 would access new NE 15t Street (constructed as part of the abutting Laurelhurst Plat, LUA 04-
063). Lot 4 would access Duvall Ave. SE.
The topography of the subject site is generally flat. All vegetation would be removed to accommodate
construction of the building pads and utilities.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
N/A
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address
issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence
of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental
Recommendation at the end of the report.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/BiPW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 4
5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to
assist decision -makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation
The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map. The RSF designation is intended to promote and enhance single family neighborhoods. The
proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of
new single family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent
with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies:
Policy LU-34. Net development densities should fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre
in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposed project for four lots would arrive at a net
density of 7.4 dwelling units per net acre which is within the allowable range for parcels smaller
than one half acre which permits density up to 9.7 dwelling units per acre.
Policy LU-35. A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single family
residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project review.
All lots equal or exceed the minimum lot size of which the smallest lot is 4,688 square feet.
Policy LU-36. Allow development at 9.7 dwelling units per acre on infill parcels of one acre or less
as an incentive to encourage single family small lot development on 4,500 sq. ft. lots. The
proposed short plat would be located on a site that is less than one-half acre and would have a
density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre.
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton
Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four new single
family dwelling units.
The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 5.0 to a maximum of 9.7 dwelling units
per acre for lots one-half an acre or less in net size. Net density is calculated after the deduction of
sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way and private easements serving three lots or
more from the gross acreage of the site. The property does not contain any sensitive areas but
does require 700 square feet of right-of-way dedication for Duvall Ave. SE. After the deduction of
700 sq. ft. from the 24,293 sq. ft. gross site (24,293 sq. ft. — 700 sq. ft. = 23,593 net sq. ft. / 0.54
net acres), the proposal would arrive at 7.4 dwelling units per acre (4 units / 0.54 acres = 7.4
du/ac), which is within the allowed range for parcels less than one-half acre.
The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet whichever is
greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed a
maximum of 50% lot coverage.
Building setbacks as required by the R-8 zone, including front and rear yard setbacks of 20 feet,
corner side yard setback of 15 feet and interior side yard setbacks of 5 feet. A front yard setback of
15 feet is allowed for the primary structure and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the
front yard street for those streets created after September 1, 1995. These setbacks would be
applicable for Lots 1, 2 and 3 as NE Vt Street is a new road under construction.
Compliance with these development standards will be verified at the time of building permit
submittal and review. Each lot would have adequate area to provide two off-street parking spaces
as required by the parking regulations.
The R-8 zone permits accessory structures only when associated with a primary structure located
on the same parcel. All structures that currently exist on the site would be removed/demolished.
Staff recommends as a condition of short plat approval that the applicant obtain a demolition
permit and complete all inspections and approvals for buildings located on the property prior to
recording of the final short plat.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 5
c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: As part of the adjacent Laurelhurst Plat, NE 1st Street would be constructed as a new
public street. Duvall Ave. SE requires a five foot wide right-of-way dedication along the entire
frontage of the short plat and is required to be improved with curb/gutter, sidewalks and paving.
The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In
order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on
the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily
trip attributed to the project. The three new lots is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new
average weekday trips per lot with credit given for the existing lot. The fee for the proposed short
plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the
recording of the short plat.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 square feet. The proposed plat
would create four lots, which are proposed as: Lot 1 at 6,533 sq. ft.; Lot 2 at 4,688 sq. ft.; Lot 3 at
5,522 sq. ft. and Lot 4 at 6,876 sq. ft. The proposed lot sizes are compatible with other proposed
lots in this area under the same R-8 zoning classification.
The proposed lots also comply with the R-8 requirements for minimum lot width (50 feet for interior
lots and 60 feet for corner lots). The minimum lot depth of 65 feet is achieved by the four lots and
thus complies with these development standards. All lots appear to have adequate building area
for the construction of single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage
requirements into consideration.
The size, orientation and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone.
d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way NE 1st Street or Duvall Ave. SE.
Each frontage requires street improvements including but not limited to: pavement, sidewalk, street
lights and curb and gutter.
If there are any common improvements made to the short plat, the establishment of a
maintenance agreement for all common improvements such as utility and access easements must
be created. However, it does not appear that any common improvements are proposed.
Topography: The topography of the site is generally flat with a gradual slope from the northeast
down to the southwest portion. All vegetation would be removed for the proposed short plat
development.
A geotechnical report was submitted with the land use application prepared by Earth Consultants,
Inc- dated January 28, 2004. This report was prepared for the adjacent Laurelhurst Plat (LUA 04-
0630 and submitted with this short plat as similar conditions exist.
Due to the potential impacts of erosion and sedimentation from project construction, staff
recommends the following erosion control measure as conditions of project approval:
• The project shall be designed and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater
Management Manual.
Community Assets: As a result of the loss of existing vegetation and in keeping with the code,
which requires adding attractiveness and value to the property, staff recommends the following
condition: the applicant be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2
inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer) per each new lot, within the 20-foot front yard
setback area.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 6
In order to ensure the trees are maintained and/or replaced if damaged, the applicant will be
required to record a restrictive covenant against the property. The restrictive covenant must
indicate that two ornamental trees are required to be planted and maintained within the front yard
setback area of each new lot. The restrictive covenant must be recorded prior to or in conjunction
with final plat recording; however, the trees must be planted prior to final building permit inspection.
Relationship to Existing Uses: Single family residential surrounds the subject plat as developed
under both the City of Renton and King County regulations. The proposal is similar to existing
development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code, which encourage residential development.
e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code
required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single family lot
with credit given for the existing single family residence, is recommended in order to mitigate the
proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $1,464.00
($488.00 x 3 new lots = $1,464.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students
per single family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short
plat would result in one additional student (0.44 X 4 lots = 1.76 rounded up to 2) to the local
schools (Maplewood Heights Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School). It is
anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by
this proposal.
Storm Water. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Storm Drainage report and plan prepared
by Core Design, Inc. dated October, 2004 with the land use application. The storm drainage runoff
from the subject short plat is proposed to utilize the detention and water quality pond being
installed for the adjacent Laurelhurst Plat, to the west, as the pond has been sized to
accommodate the additional flow. The drainage discharge from the pond will be conveyed via pipe
to Maplewood Creek.
Due to downstream flooding and erosion problems, the project is to be designed per the 1998 King
County Surface Water Drainage Manual. Staff recommends this as a condition of short plat
approval that the storm drainage system is designed to meet both detention (Level 2 flow control)
and water quality.
The System Development Charge will be at the current rate of $715.00 per new single family lot.
The fee is payable at the time of�issuance of the utility construction permit.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: There is a 12-inch water main along Duvall Ave. NE. Water
service stub(s) are required to be provided to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. A
system development charge of $1,525.00 per single family lot is required and payable at the time
of -issuance of the utility construction permit.
A sewer main extension is being installed along Duvall Ave. SE (fronting the site), as part of the
Laurelhurst Division 1 Plat. A sewer main is being installed along NE 1st St and a sewer main is
being installed along the westerly property line. There is also an 8" sewer main at Bremerton Place
NE.
Dual side sewers are not allowed. Each new lot must be served with an individual side sewer.
Sewer stub -outs must be installed prior to the recording of the short plat. A System Development
Charge of $900.00 per each new lot is required. This fee is payable at the time of issuance of a
utility construction permit.
AdminRPT_FotheringillSHPL. doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 7
H. Findings:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Fotheringill Short
Plat, File No. LUA-04-134, SHPL-A.
2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for
short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the
official land use file.
3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations
of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards of the Residential Single Family - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and
conditions of approval are complied with and based upon approval of a variance.
5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's
Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential Single
Family (zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family
(King County zoning); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8).
7. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System
Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will
be required for the each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit.
S. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the
new lots. In addition, all fire hydrants serving the plat must be fitted with Storz fittings.
L Conclusions:
The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and
complies with the goals and policies established with this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and
complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all
advisory notes and conditions are complied with and based on granting of a variance.
3. The proposed four lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code
and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with.
4. The proposed four lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by city code
provided the street dedication to Duvall Avenue SE is completed.
J. DECISION:
The Fotheringill Short Plat, File No. LUA-04-134, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all inspections and approvals for all buildings
located on the property prior to recording of the final short plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is
subject to the review and approval of Development Services.
2. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new
average daily trip associated with the project. Credit given for the existing lot. The Transportation Mitigation
Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 8
3. The project shall be designed and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual.
4. The applicant shall be required to plant two new approved trees within the 20-foot front yard setback area
of all lots within the short plat. The applicant shall be required to record a restrictive covenant against the
property prior to final short plat recording, which indicates that two trees are required to be planted and
maintained within the front yard setback area of each new lot. This condition shall be subject to the review
and approval of the Development Services Division and the trees shall be planted prior to final building
permit inspection.
5. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single family lot with
credit given for the existing single family residence. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the
recording of the short plat.
6. The project shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention
(Level 2 flow control) and water quality improvements.
7. The applicant shall submit revised PMT's (8 % x 11 size) prior to recording of the final short plat with the
corrected legal description. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development
Services Division
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
h 1-/O�
Gregg A. m man, P/B/PW Administrator decision date
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action.
Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind
the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
2. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the
hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours
between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays.
Property Services
1. The dedication of proposed short plat property for street purposes (5' strip adjoining Duvall Ave NE) requires
approval by the City Council. Said dedication is achieved via a recorded City of Renton Dedication Deed
document. If the dedication is to be recorded with the short plat, the dedication process needs to be timed in such
a way that Council approval and all other matters pertaining to the dedication have been taken care of, and said
document is ready to record. The Deed of Dedication document includes both a legal description and a map
exhibit. The legal description exhibit should be prepared, stamped, dated and signed by the applicant's surveyor.
The surveyor should also prepare the map exhibit. The dedication process requires an updated Plat Certificate
dated within the 45 days prior to Council approval of said dedication.
1. Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-04-134-SHPL and LND—20-0397,
respectively, on the drawing, preferably in the upper right-hand corner. The type size used for the land record
number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 9
2. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (directly tie the subject property to the Survey Control
Network). The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties are provided.
3. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations.
4. Note the date the existing monuments were visited, per WAC-332-150, and what was found.
5. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100.
6. Indicate what has, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots.
7. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any.
8. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing.
9. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note the addresses on the drawing.
10. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to topog lines, setback lines and other items not directly
impacting the subdivision. Setbacks are determined at time of issuance of building permits.
11. Remove the density (permitted, proposed, and net) and zoning data from the final submittal.
12. The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat
drawing. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line.
13. Pertinent King County approval blocks need to be noted on the drawing as needed
14. All vested owners of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as
needed.
15. Include a declaration block on the drawing.
16. Note whether the adjoining properties are platted (give plat name and lot number) or unplatted.
17. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this
subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawings and the associated
document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat document will be recorded first
(with King County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) (said documents recorded
concurrently with, but following the plat) need to be referenced on the short plat drawing.
18. Note that there is a street dedication associated with this short plat proposal that needs to be approved by the City
Council at the appropriate time in the short plat process.
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two
hydrants within 300 feet of the structures.
Plan Review - Storm/Surface Water
1. The Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) is $715 per building lot. This fee is payable at the time
the utility construction permit is issued.
Plan Review - Sewer
1. Separate 6-inch side sewers stubs at 2% slope are required to all lots.
2. These parcels are subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). Fees are collected at
the time the utility construction permit is issued.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $900 per building lot. This fee is payable at the time
the utility construction permit is issued.
Plan Review - Water
1. New water service stubs to each lot must be instblled prior to recording of the plat.
2. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings.
3. The Water System Development Charge (SDC) would be triggered at the single-family rate of $1,525 per new
single-family per building lot. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued.
Plan Review - Streets/Transoortation
1. Corner lots shall dedicate a minimum radius of fifteen feet.
2. Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way will be required along the frontage of the property with Duvall Ave NE.
3. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drain, landscape, and
street signs will be required along the frontage with Duvall Ave SE.
4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance.
Plan Review - General
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
AdminRPT FotheringillSHPL.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED May 2, 2005; PROJECT LUA-04-134, SHPL-A Page 10
TRANSMITTED this Z day of May, 2005 to the Owners:
Conner Homes Company Jeffery Fotheringill
846 108th Avenue NE ste: #202 13409 138th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98059
TRANSMITTED this Zd day of May, 2005 to the Applicant/Contact.
John Skochdopole
Conner Homes Company
846 108th Avenue NE ste: #202
Bellevue, WA 98004
TRANSMITTED this 2°d day of May, 2005 to the Parties of Record.
Kathlyn Marzi
13505 138th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
TRANSMITTED this 2"d day of May, 2005 to the following:
Lary Meckling, Building Official
Stan Engler, Fire Marshal
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning
Jan Conklin
Came Olson
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
South County Joumal
Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of
decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat
be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to
the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the
Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any
person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the
Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM May 16, 2005. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City
Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested
pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M.
AdminRPT FotheringiflSHPL. doc
FOTHERINGILL SHORT PLAT
OUNSR/APP' (CANT
fn•�le rw.•
carKr� awN aNawnc>L�, ra
I I Ball '
uawr a NWO.
ru•1Y•.vw
PLANNER/F INEER/SURVEYOR
wnm
—' - _-- _—•_--�� -..-.. - _ �� _ .. _. I I, DQNOM. rLJ. • e,IMTM
5AS.5 OF BEARINGS
e[Ta[[N C+ei]' a newTa vniwl'�rowTNCMa �ti')
i 5ENcy:'1ARKS:
c�x d IIMTa CONI.o� ro ui� .O! . [L!� .plp]
�>ni'aaic aa� »n raior k� r�.,c K
-� near rvnna roan • s.• . u[v. )[ua
roanurdl...,y�l),wr `�, ' ' '•„FTZ`, LEQ14L DESCRIPTION
nwra COMT1URIa1 F �, R.].00... ..
e..D•o•]a• , ; i - rYru r ,,.� n M ],ew]n wt) d rw •olmw•r Daunw n M •anle.•T
il; •I ^ ����� ��[I.d NCTId �. rOYWWr ]a MORIK 11Ytlt. Wr. WtNMtltvn
T _ -- - --- -' _ � _ -^- � r oc[n M ]wn w nar rwr•ow .aro
1 1 � - . ._ ..
TF.iTTJ . 1 �1� - ! , I Oagrr M WT p AfT Tq[Or COMYW re IwS DaMa- row wD.w A)eVK. 4D{w w[wI.DM 1
- 1 I f ;, . relena 0 M llclerw ao AR d M eYT ne rqT d M Nolern u<IJ n M rroleru MIL.
. 1 I 1 ! i 4 MDlgll II/a1L a [yr. Wr yrt N�tJT' d IW] d M MD�DIa•T W,NM d )[CTbI i iWNF.,• ])
1 1 1 I A � a Nw rcwn, euNlNDra gNDYieD Y ]nu.caa.
i �� .1 . � � . � 1 � I . I.. cdnD¢•ID •T M nwerlw•r eaww n tiro HDRrn ae R[r, rlplc[.00•MbOv 4wtl rl•t ,e[r .ae:
1` ^TJ I M Wr Ib And •1p •11bM•la i10D,YT i0 Ty marl [O•NW d M wNN D[)Cn YD
I .l,sM1r. j 1 �w IF i I 1 I rYrJy TwN! w']]'tl1 rY4y[L WIY M Maw]u LW d MyDNW01, .aOM .E9T TO . rOa+] d
1 I - j' 1 ' .]tl1CY Mill . LOD bD1 IUDIW CADLM OIIM To M nN]r. THY M%1)wYMY• 4CW •AW
I 1 ] "' I TTTr �K ����TMK �ud.O•tlW, YI .[G OMrYIC n]LM ][R tOMlgrtwlW niw ' I 1 alowru ao,uT n •uD M�orvl)lon. nlDt• NY']Ytl W .11pe •uD •NTII LNL WI N¢i l0 Tu[ k•T 1 I 1 I I � I 1~ _.`�r1I1 li f :. LN[ 0 M WT nD 1[R d •uD MypMNDy nt.,tl N007•'D01 ALPb •uD WT LNe, faV naT TO
I'� DENSITY CALCULATIONS
SITE bTATISTICS
1 � r I rornL Nn w� a+)ol .). mien Klaul awo•• w. o rlaognn, ].)u. Ir
• .M I '/', r-.__-_____-___ 1•.i rICMYD W4 D11KWD-•WL!/YTIv .IVLG a -Ow (OJi KwN
I '
Toor r
SCALE:, 1'' �• 20''. - /I � II`I�'•! au daerN
•war[[ �a Na. ac]al u. wT NTe .lur ]D)ii w: Klae
y' . _ . - �...-__. � - I � tl I I aoraaD )awr. w•• w. d wrN ]b
• _� r 11 �' r[w.mD Dawrrr� . Dul.c Nn DD+Nrn DwKa
W !' rlaeroem D�WIYi TrD DIVK.
.aw r. 3 � YI I � ; ��'• �' ' i nsuc la.o.al Tooa •n
•r• .Ca a Imo=_' � wK:?,l..u.# •1•' :¢
6F. l4DTH 6T. ...�.+_ ,► �i x• j 1
NWGC 450RHOOD DETAIL MAP
r.—
luJ z
1.
LAueluu"ai
npiO,Accmco�n
�'p.Ne•.�'Gnl ayPlr
I' -
I:
1
1
,
�
I,
FOTHERINGILL SHOR
FOR CONNER HOMES
IS _
�NRr""�iY nuN �� °wT� "• k � � I �f f I '
I
•"anND alNw i �Y I
rLY raw , , Ilk't it
�v= Ttinw Oi
li
rworweD srowt �
DwANAaa mTw
' *+ane Awl No «YiND rypaa I
TO NTc nN nno.,cr a'na•oili �.
MIQ Nn.
i
I
M
.. _ ... .... ..1... ___ .-.. _. ._art.:... 'lu
I
r
1`
lw PLAT
a".
ad aNY
ad W C 11• aG•
I
Y lHlO[?aa1r, GTWi WIC�lT{ ,.•
uNc�n Noa,ux vaRlcwL aw . W
rofaO ♦MLN.T naO o
aDx nue L.Y.u,...T rl.N+a
IM�ID AinuLr,e NaN aai,
DUVALL AVENUE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IAA I
nui T•owTNa+ a ncallonrN ao.ear or na wr w rler a ne NORn� N.Lr a i.c NDTan+ N.v aNDgla WARM M aWnRYT WAR[al a M co,—,
WARM! a NCTNN i, TCYNaaai
U NONrµ alAliaf i WT, aIK N M CDY a TI,irPL KW COWrr, YMW WTON onwwo As
aOl1WIY
Y,N� W D n, WrT a 1Ap YNpM1,p�y ayjGO aNRi T WIC2� � •yCHy �
Nl11lN DaKIgaD I•AIgLr ,N,C[ Mi'RW71ARy,Lat alnl M NOR1N LNl a uC NIODWYIOI
naT TO A rain O TANDNCT ern 1 »ce NaOr IrADW rJnDaA, OYlrl t0 M "IONT.
n�Nf NaIMYTtRT. N.CND iYD GIM. TM.DIOY A CgA4. YYLI o i0'C]Y. IM Mc
DIRANe, a 1W rler TO M aom1 Li, a M NC N ap apt a auo auaonTaNN, noel N.ivuTw ALONs uo eWIN u,.11N NlT re TN uR Lac a nc w� b wrt a u�D
auaelwlew noel Neevi•eea ALeN6 are Wr u,.loo rm to M roNr a lla••.w
CeR11y UaN eWAN AR loG AClafid
"M 1La
a WIMaAiTtlOYRIir a TK NOR1NfAT GYRq a NGTIp! Y. TOWYNi• ]a NORµ RYiya KaAR.
OTL M T1, <frl' a NNIW KM6 CWNTT, aYNNbTOW
DfJPI Ty NDRN N) a1,T naaaaCR AND
«CPr M WT IO nR nAe Iq{ IVJp.
CP1TAlY aaw aouA"l nlr ro�aiN AG1{a3
DATUK air a aasrtw . NAw Ni
BASIS OF BEARMGS OUNER/APPLICAM
No»tar,, ALPb TC uiTT.• o p w oracle NPi!
aarnw wa•a laru„+ a.i nrN ANIaa4 Na- avrca aoa
CORIIOL roNn 70a . •iL aNaJ.M,,aYNINCTON fiWa
GPITALT• aOMI a"pOMOw'•OLL IL
BENCFMAW$, PLANK mdr.IN JR�2YOR
OM -4 cpN ouYN a+a
vv ca+aa: a� N uaao r a roN • M Yn Na TsrN "LAca, aorta Ia
NnNKnON t, arN it . NaON A.i ec em a railnuw.yauNwYreN eapeT
I�rtpN DDN.woL roap •,ol . aLay. aoloa CPaTAGT. ruawL cam. tiA.Ne1
mM 7 snvsY."i. aNeNnw
VA• McPDa'N N Wao CPC alPl .11la "NN 1 VMOWMIDOI "U . WMTOw
NillailCnW N!C •4 . WIDI AN Ia. CITY a
IwrP+eomnL roNr • rY . etay. a,aa
N O✓��
I
SCALE: 1" - 20'
1@7TQ1
M
VICINITY �MAP
N
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP Department/Strategic
Planning Division
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (X-6581)
Subject:
Akers Annexation Public Hearing
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Certification of Signatures
60 % Petition
Recommended Action:
Council concur
For Agenda of:
August 1, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
N
The Council accepted a 10 % Notice of Intent petition to initiate annexation of approximately 13.3-
acres located south of Puget Drive South and east of 108`' Avenue SE, if extended. The
proponents have submitted a 60 % Petition to Annex that has been certified as sufficient by the King
County Department of Assessments. Under State law, a public hearing must be held prior to
acceptance of the Petition to Annex. Also, two public hearings are required to consider future
zoning for this annexation. The proposed public hearing would consider the Petition to Annex and
possible future R-8 zoning, if the area comes into the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set August 15, 2005 for a public hearing to consider accepting the Akers Annexation
60 % Petition to Annex and future R-8 zoning.
Rentonnedagnbill/ bh
��y O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
July 13, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: -l�~� kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (x6581)
SUBJECT: Proposed Akers Annexation — 60% Petition to Annex and
Future Zoning
TQ4TTF-
Now that the King County Department of Assessments has certified that at least 60 % of
the annexation area's assessed value is represented by signers of the petition to annex,
does the City Council want to accept this petition to annex?
If the Council accepts this petition, does it support future R-8 zoning consistent with the
current Residential Single Family land use designation shown on the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map?
If the Council accepts this petition, does it wish to authorize the Administration to
forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for its mandatory
45-day review and evaluation?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Council accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex for the 13.3-acre Akers
Annexation, support future zoning consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan
land use designation, and authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of
Intent package to the Boundary Review Board and begin preparing relevant
implementation ordinances.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City received the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition on
February 22, 2005, and after having the signatures certified by the King County
Department of Assessments, held a public meeting on April 18, 2005, to consider
hAednsp\paa\annexations\akers farms\60% issue paper.doc
Terri Briere
Page 2 of 2
July 13, 2005
whether to accept it or not. At that time, Council decided to accept the 10 % Notice of
Intent petition and authorized circulation of a 60 % Petition to Annex. The latter was
subject to property owners accepting future zoning consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and agreeing to accept a proportionate share of the City's existing
outstanding indebtedness.
On May 19, 2005, the City received the 60 % Petition to annex this 13.3-acre area and,
shortly thereafter, forwarded it to the King County Assessor's Office for certification of
signatures. On June 7, 2005, the Assessor's Office certified that based upon the listed
taxpayers, parcel numbers, and assessed value, the signatures on the petition were
sufficient, under the provisions of RCW 35.13.002, to equal at least 60 % of the area's
assessed value.
As noted in the March 23, 2005, issue paper, all responding departments and divisions
noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective
services/systems. The annexation area is within the water service area of Soos Creek
Water and Sewer District by agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water
System Plan. The area currently is not served by sewer but Renton is the designated
service provider for the northern portion of the annexation area and the southern part is
served by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. Fire suppression services are
currently provided by Fire District 40 and the King County Sheriffs Office provides
police services. Upon annexation, Renton would take over both fire suppression and
police services.
Fiscally, the proposed annexation is estimated to cost the City approximately $1,874 a
year in 2005 dollars initially, but at full build out in ten or less years, the City would
realize a positive cash flow of $13,424 a year in 2005 dollars. A one-time parks
acquisition and development cost attributable to this annexation would be $30,194. It is
also worth noting that because new development would be built to City rather than
County standards, the City will be obtaining new streets with curbs, gutters, and street
lighting at no cost to it. Also, as noted in the 10 % issue paper, the proposed
annexation complies with most relevant City annexation policies as well as the
objectives of the Boundary Review Board.
CONCLUSION:
Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the proposed Akers 60% Petition to Annex has been
certified as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It
also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with relevant Boundary Review
Board objectives. Since the annexation site is within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area and no impediments to the provisions of City services have been identified, the
proposed annexation would appear to be in the City's general welfare and interest.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Akers\60% Petition and Rezone Issue Paper.doc
SE 16th fir
a, S 18th
�-
i
16� st St
�
SE 1 L
i I ����
� 07/ I � �
�'1�4th t 1 f i r� 1 _ � it
S 27th St 1j -' - 1.
L� _
_ — W (/�
--J--cn
CD
-4—
PT-
- Q0
_ — S
615 --_ _ L_-
- - -
tF
- -
r3roposed Akers Farms Annexation o 600 1200
Figure 1: Vicinity Map Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — City Limits 1 • 72 `n
0
)Aka Nctsch. Admis[ra or
$ G Dcl Rosario mProposed Annex. Area
d'NTO I v ApnI :!(X)5
t
y �EcA,tw
T
Twe
Nft
'NSE
WE
s
x r
n
d „ �
s t', 4 y. -t�. � �E'y,+.., ♦ fie`,
g., x . • .• �' tiIIx
.
{
^#t t q
g
Oroposed Akers Farms Annexation o 200 400
Figure 2: Aerial Map Economic DevOopmcnt, Neighborhoods & Strutceic Plxnnin, -- — City Limits 1 : 2400
A'`F h AdNI Proposed Annex. Area
�N.(•(J 14 Mond -'xXh
I
E:11 nnffj E?
0
0 D
❑❑❑❑
-1 t h
ME
T�aq:]l J I OD -IU o I° Q
Figroposed Akers Farms Annexation
ure 3: Existing Structures Map
Structure
ti� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — City Limits
®� Alex l Rosar Administrator Proposed Annex. Area
G. Dcl Rosario
AN.IO 19 April 2005
0 200 400
1 : 2400
\V,
X a5.28
X 122-32
,
1 \ \137.14 1aX47
i
128.59 X128.59 12&X6 X127.94 X127.99'. - 2532\ ' - j 1
((12&86\.
X
X 141.45
�� I 1X2&48 i �\ 134.I9 x
128.a4 X,28.50 X128.51 ` 1 Xi b.tB
40 X128.40 X i \. \ -
iJ9.43
128.73
X
X
138.52 141.X
12& \ - { , `t 13t9.20 X
^�--\ 128.88 \ J 11140.70
XX129.5 1..� x
X
1
X128.84 128.40 � \\ j{ �( 140.47 __
1 J1.15 \ \�' 1 7
X128.78 X
� X110.11 _
\ I
fi
X 131.38 - �. jQ } jC 20 1 X139.08
X 1
X126.26 X
,w I
X139.50 1X.12 tw.22
X 129.18
131.40 X 131.41 12a.97 ; /
X x
129.41 { \_
\\---_- X X137.38
1
.42 \ \ ` 7.
X729.39 i2B.28
/l I
` X X72p t90 - ^ 36.66 '. 1
T
ta X129.9t--113i.73 X
i I X129.46 X 37.es
13X
1.25 X729.33
�X--
�1Jt.t9x 131.1D.- 12b75 cA \� A.
X,3,.13 X X131.46 X131.59 \ \ .�/.
3114
-��_12852 1�9.� \ X X\
X730.84 x170.90 x130.H� X7�.6S X X i� IJ162 .53
_ /
X 133.06 J/
,297
k
f320L, 3742 53&17 iX8
,20 ,2477 `x, X 137
13&73 13&84 X1J8.82 X1J8.83 t > .X 28.47 -X z X. ',. % 132 i �'\ x
X - 4 `-FF / �I33.24
X138.73 x - r ;, 13255 x x
� x r �� 133.47
i! I a z k cat 1'
x13&99 138.50 Ix xt2 �r x 1 .2
X \ \
t '� 2S4Q i '� $a'• t2i.36' 13 82
139.17 iJ9.23�� r �( -(� 1` X
139.33 X X \ y {''i' ° s �Z�' X1
X
138.88 X a 1 a r g s; +sr Y2p-3
X "f 131.52 132.84 JS69
i iJ&80 I 13 20
>69 j x '; K 1 y� & 29 1 1.57
X130.47�- X
9.69
\ \l 1 U
1X38.95 X13&82 >�36,36 '- 1 I iJ1.73 x /t &63 I !
I X
l 13H.65 X X
136.21 i X ---�-� 1 I X1 9.17 130.41 134.78
129.
�37.3o j 13e.41 40s1 / je41 i� X \ x12H.42
X
r-X1 939 1w.a
l !".
x
�� 31 s�� , A X128.27
r x
129.72 128,63 'I 19.43 X
X1 1.48 \ X
127.
130.4
137.
39.7 I 132-92 X129.29 / 129.80 \ 11&57 - X 1J2.4 \
7.
i� 1XIs x 34.7s V� 2a.X �7.22 / x
\ X X141. ' X I l \\ \ i !29 2 X 8.75 �129.26 X X28.81 X129.43 131.7
,3 b� 140.4J/ /!, '\ / 1128.71
' i 2 X128.33 ,'X \
X J15�"
\
°roposed Akers Farms Annexation o 200 400
Figure 4: Topography Map
-.---- 1m Interval Contours
ti Economic Dcvelopment, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning - - City Limits 1 . 2400
♦®4 G. D l Rosa, Administrator
G. Dcl Rosario � Proposed Annex. Area �
CANTO 19 April 2005
S 127th St
112
w
''roposed Akers Farms Annexation
Figure 5: Sensitive Areas Map Unclassified Coal Mine
tiT O Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Hazard Boundary
.®. Alex Pictsch. Administrator Moderate Slide Hazard
G. Del �lRosario 19 April 2005 Boundary
V)
M
0 300 600
1 : 3600
City Limits
0 Proposed Annex. Area
Eking County
Department of Assessments
King County Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708
Seattle, WA 98104-2384
(206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595
Email: assessor.info@metrokc.gov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
Scott Noble
Assessor
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 25, 2005 to the
King. County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior
Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton
of the properties described as the Akers Farms Annexation, has been
examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed
value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King
County tax roll records, and as.a result of such examination, found to
be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised
Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and thi$ document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2005
1�
Scott Noble, Kin County Assessor
A- CC) -C•'CI,
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTRENTON
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 N_?=,y 1 ?, or
(60% Petition —Akers Farms Annexation) RECEIVED
;i I Y CLERK'S OFFICE
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL Of SUBMITTED BY: Sink �tv.
THE CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS: i 3 74s�
Xt-
1055 South Grady Way "A Wo S
Renton, WA 98055 PHONE:
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton.
We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of
RCW 35A.14.120 et seq.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit A) and legal description (Exhibit B) are included as part of
this petition.
In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation
proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW
35A.14.120 on April 18, 2005. The City Council then determined that the City would accept ti`c
proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree
to:
(1) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the
subject property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
designations as they effect the subject property; and
(2) Assume their proportional share of the City's pre-existing bonded
indebtedness.
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of
such meeting.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
iw
(a) Tliat the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such
proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted,
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their
approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the
Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the
above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in
force, and to receive City public services.
Page 1 of 2
O
�a
I
--T
E:�JD4l I i
A
E3 El L
� � o
LET
7 �j E� E
Proposed Akers Farms Annexation
igure 3: Existing Structures Map Structure
Ec.d Rw.n...mic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning City Limits
Pictsch6 Admini.strat" Proposed Annex. Area
19 April2D05
0
N
lrf.WM,%JR
ranlAll I
AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION - EXPANDED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the north half (1/2) of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly and southwesterly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3730, lying westerly of the east line
of Lot 4, Block 10 of Akers Farms No. 6, as recorded in Volume 42 of Plats, Page 15,
records of King County, Washington and the southerly extension of said east line to the
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 1641h Street, lying easterly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 1909, and lying northerly of said
southerly right-of-way margin of SE 164`h Street and the extension of said southerly
right-of-way margin across 1091h Avenue SE and 108`h Avenue SE;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west 30 feet (108`h Avenue SE) of the northeast
quarter of said Section 29, lyin southerly of the westerly extension of the southerly
right-of-way margin of SE 164 Street to the west line of said subdivision, and lying
northerly of the easterly extension of the north line of the plat of Olympic View Terrace,
as recorded in Volume 64 of Plats, Page 69, records of King County, Washington, to the
easterly right-of-way margin of said 108`h Avenue SE, said plat being located in the
northwest quarter of said Section 29; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 30 feet of the east 30 feet of the southeast quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Section 29.
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
WARNING. Everyperson who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real
estate.)
�"Y.,0.
k
`gyp 'sB,jY�?.
��p
. ,X
-'S7 S
ti5'lilaui�e and �� IYu
�v^ j.� „tom
'ih.kA lei °4Fi @"2 i�W 'f1!j{
�F �g�S AA
" iq>'}t
t3�++VvY S�J7� Sh
iDat�e
Prx d Name
� �t7res
'
q
c
¢
tS42 i_jC�
CO eGOC"F1C
-0\�,
1
U
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Page 2 of 2
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real
estate.)
J 61.,7ti'4M
$ }S'J 2 } S -
k4€ 4 !+'�."` t{_r ` C }ft € 3 �3L3. Y.t4 �v`h1F
YtG G' t 4 `'4 Sla7
t ` ,
LS f. ) "Nor
NLLS is
9� (ii- Id {."INN
{S
'E tC 5
i4 `�,t! S e�sjLQa
i rg KS ��i'"I ��
""yd 'w
€
Dneer,=.
Si����b'L
€
Pi
1.
2.
r� bl
r
Iago 2 SF lkt
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #: --7
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept.
For Agenda of. August 1, 2005
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division
Agenda Status:
Staff Contact...... Jason Fritzler, ext. 7243
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing......
Subject:
Final Payment
Correspondence.....
Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project
Ordinance...........
Northwest Cascade (CAG 05-008)
Resolution...........
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Study Sessions......
Final Pay Estimate
Information.........
Notice of Completion
Other ................
Interlocal
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept..........
Council Concur Finance Dept.......
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required.. $121,837.47 Final Pay Est. Transfer/Amendment....
Amount Budgeted... Revenue Generated.....
Total Project Budget.. $640,000.00 City Share Total Project...
Summary of Action:
The Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project began on April 18, 2005, and was completed on June
6, 2005. The original contract amount was $440,000.00 with the final contract amount being $447,686.46
including the adjusted quantities, unit prices, and change orders. The increase in the final contract balance
was due to change order #2 for $900.00 and adjusted quantities / unit prices totaling $6,786.46.
The cost breakdown of the total project budget of $640,000 is: 1) $106,428.40 was for design services and
staff costs; 2) $40,105.82 was for construction services, staff costs, and material testing; and, 3)
$447,686.46 was for the construction contract. These amounts total $594,220.68 of the project
expenditures leaving a balance of $45,779.32, which will cover staff costs during the project closure
process and the completion of as -built plans.
Staff Recommendations:
Approve completion of the project and release retainage for the full project in the amount of $22,384.32
after sixty (60) days, subject to the required authorization.
H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TATtDESIGN.ENGVASON\ProjectsVake Washington Boulevard Slide\City CorrespondenceTWI3 Retainage Agenda Bill.doc
c
TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR
CONTRACTOR: Northwest Cascade
CONTRACT NO. CAG 05-008
DATE. 6/28/2005
ESTIMATE NO. 3 (Final)
PROJECT: Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane
1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 121,837.47
2. SALES TAX @ 8.80%
3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $ 121,837.47
4.
EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR
$
309,556.54
5. *
EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE
$
115,745.60
6.
SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
$ 425,302.14
7.
RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS
$
16,292.45,
8. **
RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE
$
6,091.87
9.
SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE
$ 22,384.32
10.
SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID
11.
SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE
$
-
12.
SUBTOTAL-SALESTAX
$ -
*
(95ToxLINEI )
**
(RETAINAGE: 5%)
GRAND TOTAL:
$ 447,686.46
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION:
PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11):
ACCOUNT 317.012302.016.5950.0030.67/25547/5354
RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8):
ACCOUNT 317.012302.0165950.0030.67/25547/5354
TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE:
CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965
CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY Of
PERJURY, THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED, THI
SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBE[
HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM LUST, DUE AND UNPAI[
OBLIGATION AGAINST THE F RENTON, AND THAT I AN
AUTHORIZED TO AUTH15PMA7AKD (7B�T1F� TO SAID CLAM
$ 115,745.60 D1i
$ 6,091.87 l/
$ 121,837.47
r10(ecL, RwM-- Lake W-10noon BouW-d Slip Plan• PAY ESTiIATE 03
;ubjeCL: CAG 05-ON
rw
Tkrw P rlod
chedrrfarPluw
Bkl aNn
I
aem
Owplptlon
Kem
Urfa Coal
unh
Pwn OtrnBly
Plen ToW Cost
M1ir1s~ Orrery
�'�"'� ~"iie
TNr Oe.,ery
71Jr A-*7•w Ow•Wrr
7•d M,«.e
x Cuurr•re
a^e1al
1
Cordrador Srypled Sur wAV (Fit-05.4(3))
Tmft Coned and WageMI.10)
Twip.Walw ParWpN=rcaon COMrol(R1-07.15. WSDOT 601)
UWiy PoawYg(RI-07.7)
Rasok?O n d LaWy C Oc U (1-07.17)
MoMlration(1-09.7)
CMerkg and GrjbWV(2-01)
AwwAng and Rewpn) Beam Gwrdmil (SA 1)
Remaw A1p11a1 Corravle Pavemw4 (2-02)
Rwnove PW& Traft I."ftgs (8-22.3(6))
R4Ple0e A611" COn0W* Pawnsra "2 ara 5-04.3)
kntat New Tra c, RPM MwWq. (Type 1) @00, 6622 an4 9-21)
Sakrar Poe Drwnp (W 300T Scher Pg. Walt Special Proltalorr)
Solder Pees Lb"dal (y/500T Solder Pte Well Special AvAslon)
PmaMco W Drainap lA"W
Tl.,bw Laggkg alaWailon (Solder Pile SP 2.02, 9-092)
Rwnovkg OWbucdo (Solder Pie SP 3.03G. I-W.6)
(Peer C-:u W Nxtw ,GA) SP2.Ol wW 3. 6.022)
Pwlm wmTc41(PGASP3.040)
TWI..k Verification Test Program (PGA SP 3.04C)
EnswdonforLaggkgLnlallabon
Rernoval at Soa Spot irrm She
/fldrweedM and Pbrarg (9.142)
EM,4on CorAd (,k") Maakg (9-14.5)
Topwil Type A (9-14)
FWsh and l-04.11
10,000.
LS
1
$ 10,000.00
1.D0
S 10,000.00
0.00
$
1.00
$ 10,000.00
100%
wwal
2
6,300.
LS
1
$ 6,300.00
0.67
$ 4,200.00
0.33
$ 2,100.00
1.00
S 6,300.00
100%
enwal
3
1,320.00
LS
1
S 1,320.00
1.00
$ 1,320.00
0.00
$
1.00
$ 1,320.00
100%
wnN
4
650.
FA
1
$ 650.00
0.DO
$
0.00
$
0.00
$
0%
On"
5
MOO
FA
1
$ 950.00
0.00
$
0.00
.S
0.00
$
0%
wnml
6
11.000.
LS
1
$ 11,DD0.00
0.75
$ 8,250.00
025
$ 2,750.00
1.00
S 11,0DO.00
100%
anal
7
5tSOODO
LS
1
$ 5,500.00
1.00
$ 5,500.00
0.00
S
1.00
S 5,500.00
100%
wwal
6
40.00
LF
200
S 8.000.00
50.00
$ 2,000.00
175.00
$ 7,000.00
225.00
$ 9.000.00
113%
wreral
9
10.16
SY
300
S 3,048,00
0.00
$
833.00
S 8.46328
833.00
$ 8.46328
278%
eneral
10
165.00
LS
1
$ 165.00
0.00
$
1.00
$ 165.00
too
S 165.00
100%
lrurar
11
145FOC
TON
80
S 11,600.00
0.00
$
96.15
S 13,941.75
96.15
$ 13.941.7S
120%
xrara
12
2,a2.
LS
1
$ 2,042.40
0.00
$
1.00
$ 2,042-40
1.00
$ 2,042.40
100%
rrnnl
13
95.
LF
1200
$ 114,000.00
1141.00
S 108,395.00
0.00
$
1141.00
$ 108,395.00
95%
xwal
14
84.
LF
1200
$ 100,900.00
1141.00
S 95,844.00
0.00
$
1141.00
$ 95.844.00
95%
lrral
15
6.
SY
ISO
$ 900.00
0.00
$
0.00
S
0.00
$
0%
,renal
16
1.930.
MSM
9
S 17.370.00
6.05
$ 11,676.501
1.73
$ 3,335.04
7.78
$ 15.011.54
86%
wnral
17
5,000.
FA
1
$ 5,000.00
0.00
$ 13,181.49
0.00
$
0.00
$ 13,181.49
264%
rral
to
3.000.
EA
28
$ 84,000.00
10.00
$ 30,000.00
18.00
$ 54.000.00
28,00
$ 84,000.00
100%
rural
t9
1,0500
EA
3
$ 3,150.00
0.00
$
3.00
$ 3,150.00
3.00
$ 3,150.00
100%
rural
20
S2000
LS
1
$ 5.100.00
1.00
$ 5,200.00
0.00
S
1.00
$ 5.200.00
100%
moral
21
7.5C
CY
1000
$ 7.500.00
1236.00
S 9,270.00
286.00
$ 2,145.00
1522.00
$ 11,415,00
152%
rnM
22
17.00
CY
1000
$ 17,000,00
1236.00
$ 21,012-00
286.00
S 4,862.00
1522.00
S 25,874.00
152%
rnml
23
1,320.
LS
1
$ 1,320.00
0.00
$
1.00
$ 1,320.00
1.00
$ 1,320.00
100%
24
3,000.
LS
1
$ 3.000.00
0.00
S
0.00
$
0.00
$
0%
reel
25
- 5,000.
LS
/
$ 5,000.W
0.00
S
0.00
$
0.00
$
0% -
nwal
26
15.663.
LS
1
$ 15.663.00
0.00
S
1.00
$ 15,663.00
1.00
$ 15,663.00
100°,G
711
SdderPM Or:lgr CJwoge
0.00
LS
1
$
0.00
$ -
1.0
$
1.00
$
100%
1n
BaHCY ttrre lal
900.00
Ls
1
$ 900.00
0.00
$
1.0
$ 900.00
1.00
$ 900.00
100%
Pr•SWW Taal Toms $ 441.378.40 S 325,648.99 $ 121,837.47 $ 447,686.46
SYw 7- a e.M
TOTAL $ 441.378.40 S 325,848.99 $ 121,837.47 $ 447,686.46 101%
Original Contract Arlount
$ 441,378.40
Contract w/ Changes
$ 447,686.46
Change Order Total
$ 900.00
Material Overruns / Underruns
$ 5.408.06
Material On Hand
Amount Paid to
Contractor
Dale Paid (Pay
Estimate r)
Amount Deducted
on This Estimate (r)
Amount Paid to
Contractor
Date Paid (Pay
Estimate r)
Amount
Deducted on Thin
Estimate (r)
Total MOH
oral MOH
MOH S
Total $ 121,837.47
447,686.48
sTAT£ of State of Washington
0 6 y Department of Revenue
i Audit Procedures & Administration
1889 a0
1 PO Box 47474
Olympia, Washington 98504-7474
Reg.No.:
Date: January 6, 2005
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
City of Renton Assigned To
Tracy Schuld
1055 South Grady Way Date Assigned
Renton, WA 98055
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below.
Description of Contract Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project (05-008)
Contractor's Name
Northwest Cascade
Telephone No. (253) 848-2371
Contractor's Address
PO Box 73399, 10412 John Bananola Way E, Puyallup WA 98374
Date Work Commenced
April 18, 2005
Date Work Completed
June 6, 2005
Date Work Accepted
June 6, 2005
Surety or Bonding Co.
Safeco Care of Bratrud Middleton
Agent's Address
Karen Swanson, PO Box 2940, Tacoma 98401
Contract Amount: $440,000.00
Additions or Reductions: $7,686.46
Sales Tax:
Total $447,686.46
mo
Phone No:
Amount Disbursed: $425,302.14
Amount Retained: $22,384.32
Total: $447,686.46
(Disbursing Officer)
The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504-
7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until
receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in accordance with said certificate.
FORM REV 31 0020 (12-92)
H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENGVASON\Projects\Iake Washington Boulevard Slide\Money\Notice_of_('ompletion.doc
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: "Transportation Systems
For Agenda of: August 1, 2005
Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Jason Fritzler, x 7243
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Subject:
KPG, Inc. Combined Design Services Contract for
Correspondence..
Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Transit
Ordinance .............
Improvement Roadway Alignment Projects
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business....... X
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Fund 317 Transfer Summary - Attachment A
Information.........
Design Contract
2006-2011 TIP #7, #8, and # 16
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required
Amount Budgeted.....
Total Project Budget
$200,000.00
(See Attachment A)
$ 0
$6,647,000.00 (2006-2011
TIP #7 and #8)
Transfer/Amendment....
Revenue Generated......
City Share Total Project
$200,000.00
$6,647,000.00
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
KPG, Inc. was selected as the consultant for the Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW
Improvement Projects. Approval of a contract in the amount of $115,639.07 is requested to complete an
initial portion of required design work to satisfy area businesses along Hardie Avenue SW by
determining the roadway alignment for the larger transportation project. Additionally, approval of
$10,000.00 in City staff costs for contract oversight and other staff related work plus $57,000.00 for
future coordination efforts as the entire project moves forward and $16,899.93 for contingencies is
requested.
Staff is requesting that $190,000.00 be transferred from NE 4th St/Hoquiam Avenue NE Project
(2006-2011 TIP 416) and that $10,000.00 be transferred from the Transit Center Video Project to the
Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, totaling $200,000.00. The construction of the NE 4th
St/Hoquiam Project (new signal) has been delayed. The Transit Center Video Project has been
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with KPG, Inc. for design
engineering services in the amount of $115,639.07, for the first part of design services on the
Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, Phase 1.
2. Authorize the transfer of funds: a) $190,000.00 from the NE 41h St/Hoquiam Avenue NE Project,
and, b) $10,000.00 from the Transit Center Video Project (totaling $200,000.00), into the Rainier
Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, Phase 1 fund.
H:ADivision.s\IRANSPOR IA I'ADMIN\Agenda 2005\KPG Design Contract Re%ised 07 07 2005.doc
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTEMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 1, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: ���� Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: U Gregg ZimmermarArnistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Jason Fritzler, Transportation Design Project Manager, x7243
SUBJECT: KPG, Inc. Combined Design Services Contract for Rainier Avenue S and
Hardie Avenue SW Transit Improvement Roadway Alignment Projects
ISSUES:
1. Should the Council authorize the agreement with KPG, Inc. for design engineering
services in the amount of $115,639.07 for the first part of design services on the
combined Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, Phase
1, and transfer funds between projects?
2. Should the Council authorize additional funding in the amount of $84,360.00 to cover
contingencies, contract oversight and future staff costs associated with the larger
project?
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with KPG, Inc. for design
engineering services in the amount of $115,639.07 for the first part of design services on
the Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, Phase 1.
2. Authorize the transfer of funds: a) $190,000.00 from the NE 4`h St/Hoquiam Avenue NE
Project, and, b) $10,000.00 from the Transit Center Video Project (totaling $200,000.00),
into the Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, Phase 1
fund (see Attachment A).
Terri Brier, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
August 1, 2005
Page 2
Re: KPG, Inc. Combined Design Services Contract
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Transportation improvements for these corridors are anticipated to become part of a larger,
Sound Transit (transit -way and pedestrian) improvement project. The City will be a partner in
financing and construction of the project.
Specifically, the final project will construct modifications to Hardie Avenue SW between SW
Sunset Boulevard and Rainier Avenue South that will involve widening the road to
accommodate business access transit (BAT) lanes on Hardie Avenue SW both northbound and
southbound, installing a transit -only traffic signal at Hardie Avenue SW and Rainier Avenue
South, reconstructing segments of Rainier Avenue South (between S 2"d Street to S 4th Place) to
increase pedestrian and vehicle circulation, control vehicular access, and improve pedestrian
access to transit stops, and construct an eastbound transit queue at the SW Sunset
Boulevard/Rainier Avenue South intersection. The project will also include engineering of
curb/gutter/plantings, sidewalks, and rebuilding the BNSF Railroad Bridge crossing I-lardie
Avenue SW.
The planning study for this project (which is ongoing until an agreement establishing funding
with Sound Transit is complete) has raised some questions with commercial property owners
along Hardie Avenue SW regarding the ultimate alignment of Hardie Avenue SW and impacts to
commercial properties. The timing of answering these questions became an issue for these
businesses along the Hardie Avenue SW corridor, some of which are planning to make
improvements to their properties. They need to know the impacts these improvements would
have on their property. To answer these questions quickly, the City selected the design
consultant early and now desires to enter into a contract to answer these questions conclusively
without waiting for the agreement with Sound Transit to be finalized and before full design
efforts commence.
KPG, Inc. was selected to be the consultant for the Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue
SW Improvement Projects. Their contract for $115,639.07 with the City will answer questions
of alignment along Hardie Avenue SW and establish necessary information to provide back to
the business owners along Hardie Avenue SW. Funding is needed to begin this design and
approvals are needed to execute the design contract with KPG. The additional staff costs are not
part of this contract, but will be used to cover City contract oversight and future coordination
work associated with the project.
There is currently no money budgeted for this project in 2005 and we are requesting that
$190,000 be transferred from the NE 4`h St/1-loquiam Avenue NE Project (2006-2011 TIP #16)
and that $10,000 be transferred from the Transit Center Video Project to the Rainier Avenue
South and Hardie Avenue SW Improvement Projects, totaling $200,000.
H \Division s`.I RANSPUR I A RADN"\Agenda ,00SUKPU In. Rainier Hardie Issue PapeO doc
Terri Brier, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
August 1, 2005
Page 3
Re: KPG, Inc. Combined Design Services Contract
The NE 41h/Hoquiam Project (new signal) has been delayed and will not be going into
construction this year. The Transit Center Video Project has been completed. The $200,000.00
to be added to the 2005 project budgets for this project will cover design contract expenses,
contingencies, and current/future staff costs for the project.
cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor
Sharon Griffin, Transportation Program Development Coordinator
Jason Fritzler, Transportation Design Project Manager
File
11 \Division. s\TRANSPOR TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2005\KPG Inc Rainier Hardie Issue PapeO doc
Attachment A
Fund 317 Transfer
Rainier Ave. S and Hardie Ave. SW Improvements
7/8/2005
Need: Design contract $ 115,639.07
Staff time 67,461.00
Contingency (9%) 16,899.93
Total $ 200,000.00
Transfer:
2006-2011 2005 Transfer New 2005 Project #
TIP # Project Reallocation Amount Allocation
7
Rainier Ave Improvements - $
_
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
12501
S 4th PI to S 2nd St
8
Hardie Ave. SW Transit /
_
190,000
190,000
12502
Multimodal Improvements
16
NE 4th St / Hoquiam Ave. NE
344,900
(190,000)
154,900
12209
Dropped
Transit Center Video
10,000
(10,000)
-
12208
Total Net Sum $ 354,900 $ - $ 354,900
Note: Transfer amounts will be reconciled, as necessary, with the final TIP document.
SGriffin\Budget\Rainier-Hardie Fund Transfer July 2005
ConsultanUAddresslielephone
Local Agency
KPG, Inc
Standard Consultant
753 9th Avenue North
Agreement
Seattle, WA 98109
® Architectural/Engineering Agreement
❑ Personal Services Agreement
Agreement Number
Project Title And Work Description
---- ----------------------- --------- - - - ... ... ----- ---------------------------------- ............ .......................
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Federal Aid Number
Transit Improvement Project
- Roadway Alignment
Agreement Type (Choose one)
® Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $ 11.5-639.07-----------------
- - - ------------------------------------------
❑ Cost Plus Fixed Pee
DBE Participation
Overhead Progress Payment Rate %
❑ Yes ® No %
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
Overhead Cost Method
❑Actual Cost
91-147-7622
Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date
❑ Yes ❑ No 09/30/2005
❑ Actual Cost Not To Exceed %
❑ Fixed Rate °
------------------------------------- _-------------------------------
Fixed Fee $
----------------------.....-------- --------------------------------
(� Specific Rates Of Pay
Total Amount Authorized $ 115,639.07
❑ Negotiated Hourly Rate
Management Reserve Fund $ -
...... ................. ............................
❑ Provisional Hourly Rate
Maximum Amount Payable $ 115 639.07
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work
Index of Exhibits
Exhibit "A" - Scope of Work
Exhibit "D" - Payment (by Agreement Type)
Exhibit "G" - Subcontract Work/Fee Detemvnation
Exhibit "H" - Title VI. Assurances
Exhibit "1" - Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
Exhibit "J" - Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
Exhibit "K" - Consultant Claim Procedures
Exhibit "M" - Certification Documents
THIS AGREEMENT; made and entered into this day of ,
between the Local Agency of Renton Washington, hereinafter called the "AGENCY"
and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT".
DOT Form 140-089 EF Page 1 of 8
Revised 6/05
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it advisable
and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to
professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained herein, or attached and
incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I General Description of Work
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above described work and services as herein defined and necessary to
accomplish the completed work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor, and related
equipment necessary to conduct and complete the work as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT_
II Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for this PROJECT is detailed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by
this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
III General Requirements
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall receive
advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and/or individuals shall be
coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress and presentation meetings with
the AGENCY and/or such Federal, State, Community, City or County officials, groups or individuals as may be requested by
the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring CONSULTANT
participation. The minimum required hours or days notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT
and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will outline in
written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the work in sufficient detail so that the progress
of the work can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex
in the performance of this contract. The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CF'R Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the CONSULTANT
to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT that may result in the termination of this
AGREEMENT.
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), if required, per 49 CFR Part 26, or participation of Minority
Business Enterprises (MBE), and Women Business Enterprises (WBE), shall be shown on the beading of this AGREEMENT.
If D/M/WBE firms are utilized, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will be shown on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime CONSULTANT is a DBE firm they
must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (C'UF) regulation outlined in the AGENCY'S "DBE Program Participation
Plan". The mandatory DBE participation goals of the AGREEMENT are those established by the WSDOT'S Highway and
Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY.
All Reports, PS&E materials, and other data fiunished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned. All
electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C_"
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this PROJECT, and
are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY of any
such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the
CONSULTANT.
Page 2 of 8
IV Time for Beginning and Completion
The CONSULTANT shall not bean any work under the terms of this AGR FFM1NT until authorized in writing by the
AGENCY.
All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT, but may
be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable delays caused
by an act of GOD or governmental actions or other conditions beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. A prior
supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established completion time.
V Payment Provisions
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this AGREEMENT
as provided in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, and by reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals
necessary to complete the work The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
A post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT. The need for a post audit will be determined by the State Auditor,
WSDOT External Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY'S PROJECT Manager.
VI Sub -Contracting
The AGENCY permits sub -contracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit "G" attached hereto and by this reference
made part of this AGREEMENT.
Compensation for this sub -consultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit "G."
The work of the sub -consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been
issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub -consultant shall be
substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V. All sub -contracts shall contain all applicable provisions of this
AGREEMENT.
With respect to sub -consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the Prompt
Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011.
The CONSULTANT shall not sub -contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior
written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for sub -contracting shall create, between the AGENCY and
sub -contractor, any contract or any other relationship. A DBE certified sub -consultant is required to perform a minimum
amount of their sub -contracted agreement that is established by the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs Project
Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY.
VII Employment
The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay
any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul this AGREEMENT without
liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or otherwise recover the full amount
of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services
required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and
not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's Compensation Act on behalf of said
employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a
Page 3 or 8
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT'S employees or other persons while
so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of
the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full- or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of the contract, in the employ of the
United States Department of Transportation, or the STATE, or the AGENCY, except regularly retired employees, without
written consent of the public employer of such person.
Vill Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees to
comply with the following laws and regulations:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 USC Chapter 21 Subchapter V Section 2000d through 2000d-4a)
Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 USC Chapter 3 Section 324)
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(29 USC Chapter 16 Subchapter V Section 794)
Age Discrimination Act of 1975
(42 USC Chapter 76 Section 6101 et seq.)
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100-259)
American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 USC Chapter 126 Section 12101 et. seq.)
49 CFR Part 21
23 CFR Part 200
RCW 49.60.180
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "H"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit "H" in every
sub -contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives
issued pursuant thereto.
IX Termination of Agreement
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten (10) days written notice to the
CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the CONSULTANT, a
final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit "r' for the type of AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the CONSULTANT of the
Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the
total amount that would be due when computed as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the
CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT, the
above formula for payment shall not apply.
Page 4 of 8
In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGl:NC'Y with consideration given to the actual costs
incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the date of termmation, the amount of work originally required
which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination; whether that work is in a form or a type which is usable to the
AGENCY at the time of termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the work required
and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the work
performed at the time of termination.
Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount, which would have been made using
the formula set forth above.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT'S or it's employee's default or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a
termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for actual
costs in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously.
In the event of the death of any member, partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervisory personnel
assigned to the PROJECT, or dissolution of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or disaf bation of the
principally involved employee, the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under the
terms of this AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the AGENCY. This subsection shall not be a bar to renegotiation of
the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY'S concurrence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT, payment shall be made as set
forth in the second paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of any
type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for failure of
the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the AGREEMENT
will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the
CONSULTANT.
X Changes of Work
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary to
correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional compensation thereof. Should
the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof
changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be
considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section )UV_
XI Disputes
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connection with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT between the
CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY
Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided, however,
that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall
be subject to de novo judicial review. If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes concerning alleged
design errors will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit "J", and disputes concerning claims will be
conducted under the procedures found in Exlubit "K".
XII Venue, Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction
In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation
under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior court of the State of
Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be
resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal from such
decisions of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT hereby
consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the
AGENCY is located.
Page 5 of 8
XIII Legal Relations
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Fcderal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done
under this AGREEMENT. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE and its officers and employees harmless from
and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part
from the CONSULTANT'S negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided that nothing
herein shall require a CONSULTANT to indemnify the AGENCY or the STATE against and hold harmless the AGENCY
or the STATE from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY or the STATE, their agents,
officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent
negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees, and (b) the AGENCY or the STATE, their agents, officers
and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence (2) the costs to the
AGENCY or the STATE of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the
CONSULTANT'S negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees.
The CONSULTANT'S relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which
is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The CONSULTANT specifically assumes
potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT'S own employees against the AGENCY and, solely for the
purpose of this indemnification and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state
industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction
contracts, if any, on the PROJECT. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract administration. By
providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper construction techniques, job site
safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as otherwise required, the
following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48
RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million
dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall
not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar .($1,000,000)
combined single limit.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance secured by the CONSULTANT,
the AGENCY will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall fiunish the AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements required by the AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the right to require
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the execution of this
AGREEMENT to the AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT'S professional liability to the AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable under this
AGREEMENT or one million ($1,000,000) dollars, whichever is the greater, unless modified by Exhibit "L". In no case
shall the CONSULTANT'S professional liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Page 6 of 8
The AGhN(`Y will pay no prowess payments under Section V until the CONSI t1,TA:NT has fully complied with this
section. This remedy is not exclusive; and the A(iEN(Y and the. STATE may take such other action as is available to it
under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIV Extra Work
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMFNT in
the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for; performance of
any part of the work under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise affects any other
terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the (1) maximum
amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms and shall modify the
AGREEMENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment', hereafter referred to as "CLAIM", under
this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order_ However, if the AGENCY decides
that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause. However, nothing in this clause
shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A) and (B) above, the maximum amount payable for this
AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV Endorsement of Plans
If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estimates, or any other engineering data
firaished by them.
XVI Federal and State Review
The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to
participate in the review or examination of the work in progress.
XVII Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit "M-1(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit "M-2"
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions, Exhibit
"M-3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying and Exhibit "M-4" Certificate of
Current Cost or Pricing Data Exhibit "M-3" is required only. in AGREEMENTS over $100,000 and Exhibit "MA" is
required only in AGREEMENTS over $500,000.
XVIII Complete Agreement
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties.
No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for, any
statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the
terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this AGREEMENT.
XIX Execution and Acceptance
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the proposal, and the supporting material submitted by the
CONSULTANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
Page 7 of 8
In witness whereof, the p es �o have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the
"Execution DateAx �g�on 1) of this AGREEMENT.
By
J&epjVGiagoazzi, PE - KPG
By
Agency
DOT Fora: 14,"39 EF
Revised 605 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit A-1
City of Renton
RAINIER AVENUE / HARDIE AVENUE
Scope of Work
Roadway Alignment
June 15, 2005
Introduction
The City of Renton is interested in making improvements to Rainier Avenue S between
Hardie Avenue and 2nd Avenue and to Hardie Avenue between Rainier Avenue S and
Sunset Boulevard. Improvements to Rainier Avenue S include the following:
• Installation of curbing and center landscaped medians
• Installation of new curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides
• Planter strips between the curb and sidewalk
• Modification of existing storm drain system
• Minor utility adjustments and/or relocations to accommodate the proposed
roadway improvements
• New street and pedestrian lighting
• A new traffic signal at the S 4`h Place intersection
• Modified signals at the S 3"j Place, S 3"d Street and S 2nd Street intersections
• Installation of an Eastbound transit queue jump lane at the S 3' Street
intersection
• Urban design features which could include:
o Decorative paving
• Custom railings
o Custom bus shelters
• Trash receptacles
• Bicycle racks
Benches
• Irrigation of all new planter areas
• Pavement overlay
• New channelization
• Parking lot and driveway access revisions as necessary to accommodate the
proposed roadway improvements
Improvements to Hardie Avenue S include:
Exhibit A-1
• Installation of one business access / transit (BAT) lane in each direction
• Installation of new curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides
• Planter strips between the curb and sidewalk, and landscaped center medians
where left turns are not needed
• Replacement of the BNSF Railroad trestle over Hardie Avenue to provide
adequate horizontal and vertical clearance
• Modification of existing storm drain system where useable
• New storm drainage system where necessary
• Minor utility adjustments and/or relocations to accommodate the proposed
roadway improvements
• New street lighting
• A new transit only signal at the Hardie Avenue / Rainier Avenue intersection
• Modified signals at the 7th Street and Sunset Boulevard intersections
• Urban design features which could include:
• Decorative paving
• Custom railings
• Custom bus shelters
• Trash receptacles
• Bicycle racks
• Benches
• Irrigation of all new planter areas
• Pavement overlay
• New channelization
• Parking lot and private property revisions as necessary to accommodate the
proposed improvements
The City would like to proceed with Phase 1 of the project, which consists of developing
the Hardie Avenue S improvements to a point where frontage improvements can be
identified and made to businesses along Hardie Avenue S. This is necessary to ensure
coordination between the roadway improvements and proposed private property
redevelopment plans along the corridor. This phase of work will need to be completed by
September 30, 2005.
Exhibit A-1
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1.0 - Management / Coordination / Administration
1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and
administration to complete the project (estimated 3 months)
1.2 Prepare project schedule
1.3 Provide monthly progress reports
1.4 Attend coordination meetings with City (estimate 5 meeting)
Task 2.0 - Field Survey / Base Mapping
2.1 The Consultant shall prepare 1"=20" topographic base maps of the Hardie
Avenue corridor. Property lines will be located based on recorded surveys and city
/ WSDOT right-of-way plans
Task 3.0 - Property Owner Coordination
3.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend meetings with property owners to
coordinate the roadway design (estimate 5 property owners)
Task 4.0 - Utility Coordination
4.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with all utilities in the corridor to identify
existing facilities and determine the extent of any system upgrades / extensions
planned in the project vicinity.
Task 5.0 - Plan Layout and Right -of -Way Determination
5.1 The Consultant shall develop the improvement plans to a level that locates the
curb, gutter and sidewalk in enough detail to determine the right-of-way needs
along Hardie Avenue.
5.2 The Consultant shall prepare draft and final submittals for review and approval
by the City.
Exhibit D-1
Payment (Lump Sum)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services
rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work specified
in Section II, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
The estimate in support of the lump sum amount is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and by this reference made part of
this AGREEMENT.
A. Lump Sum Agreement: Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of
a lump sum amount as shown in the beading of this AGREEMENT.
Management Reserve Fund: The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to
provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the
AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional
work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing
and shall not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the
heading of this AGREFNIFNT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in
the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished. Any changes requiring
additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be made in accordance with Section
XIV, "Extra Work."
Maximum Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount
Authorized, and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not
include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in Section XIV, "Extra Work." No minimum amount
payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT.
B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for
reimbursement of costs on a monthly basis. To provide a means of verifying the billed salary costs for
the CONSULTANT'S employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews
may consist of recording the names, titles, salary rate, and present duties of those employees
performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned
will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under
this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, electronic data
and other related documents which are required to be famished under this AGREEMENT.
Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for
payment, which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY unless such claims are
specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its
acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the AGENCY may
have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect to such
claims.
DOT Form 140-089 E F Exhibit D-1
Revtsed 6/05
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and at
the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the
event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will
refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty (30) days of notice of the overpayment. Such
refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a
finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. The CONSULTANT has twenty (20) days after receipt of
the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the AGENCY for audit findings.
D. inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub -consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of the AGENCY, STATE and the United States, for a period of three
(3) years after receipt of final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception: if
any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this contract is initiated
before the expiration of the three (3) year period, the cost records and accounts shall be retained until
such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
Exhibit D
HOUR ESTIMATE I CX
Project: is a �pe;v< �
City of Renton ' Civil E"g--mg '
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
TASK 1.0 —Management / Coordination / Administration
1.1 Management and Admitistration (3 months) 6 6 0 6 18
1.2 Project Schedule 2 4 0 0 6
1.3 Prepare monthly progress reports 6 6 0 2 14
1.4 Coordination / Progress Meetings (5) 10 10 0 0 20
TASK 2.0 - Field Survey and Base Mapping_
2.1 A Base map preparation 0 2 12 0 14
2.1 B Field review of base maps for accuracy 0 4 8 0 12
2.1 C Utility Locates 0 2 0 0 2
TASK 3.0 - Property Owner Coordination
3.1 One-on-one meetings with property owners (10 meetings) 20 20 8 4 52
6/24i2C05
Exhibit D
FLOUR ESTIMATE
Project:
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue I Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
TASK 4.0 - Utility Coordination
4.1 Franchise / City Utility Coordnation
TASK 5.0 - Plan Layout and ROW Determination
1<1P4G
♦ A-bitccnrre
Landscape A —hi t—
♦ Civil Engineering
0 8 0 4 12
5.1 A Develop improvement plans 40 160 220 0 420
5.1 B Develop ROW needs plans 4 4 24 0 32
5.2 Prepare submittals 4 8 16 4 32
TDTAL+'HOLiRS 172 r 260 d �484,'
e°firma }, R. Hai . ;' 'tka :f ,`�. _' s �� * x ;.2' s.r *
6/24/2005
Exhibit D
FEE ESTIMATE
Project:
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
TASK 1.0 - Management /Coordination /Administration
KPG
♦ Architecture
Landscape Architecture
♦ Civil Engineering
Class�fica6ort �,<'
Hours
Pay Rate
. Cost
x £
Senior Engineer
24
$
50.48
$ 1,211.52
Project Engineer
26
$
39.42
$ 1,024.92
Technician
0
$
23.08
$ -
Clerical
8
$
19.23
$ 153.84
Direct Salary Total
$ 2,390.28
Overhead (150.38%)
$ 3,594.50
Fee (15%)
$ 897.72
Reimbursables (see attached breakdown)
$ 100.00
ask.l.ti Total,.
g
TASK 2.0 - Field Survey and Base Mapping
Classlficafio>z ti € 4 � Vu,' yt Nours ,,Pey Rate � Cost +.
p -,la
Senior Engineer
0
$
50.48
$ -
Project Engineer
8
$
39.42
$ 315.36
Technician
20
$
23.08
$ 461.60
Clerical
0
$
19.23
$ -
Direct Salary Total
$ 776.96
Overhead (150.38%)
Fee (15%)
Reimbursables (see attached breakdown)
$ 1,168.39
$ 291.80
$ 44,560.00
6/24/2005
Exhibit D
FEE ESTIMATE
Project:
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
TASK 3.0 - Property Owner Coordination
W IP
♦ Architecture
Iandscapc Architccture
♦ Civil Engineering
Classlficabon
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
Senior Engineer
20
$
50.48
$ 1,009.60
Project Engineer
20
$
39.42
$ 788.40
Technician
8
$
23.08
$ 184.64
Clerical
4
$
19.23
$ 76.92
Direct Salary Total
$ 2,059.56
TASK 4.0 - Utility Coordination
Senior Engineer
0
$
50.48
$
-
Project Engineer
8
$
39.42
$
315.36
Technician
0
$
23.08
$
-
Clerical
4
$
19.23
$
76.92
Direct Salary Total
$
39228
Overhead (150.38%)
$
589.91
Fee (15%)
$
147.33
Reimbursables (see attached breakdown)
$
100.00
Task 4 t1,Tota1E .5, ._., t �,..
5 =.1229:52'
6/24/2005
Exhibit D
FEE ESTIMATE
Project:
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
TASK 5.0 - Plan Layout and ROW Determination
KPG
♦ Architecture
Landscape Architecture
♦ Civil Engineering
rrojecr Lngmeer 172 $ 39.42 $ 6,780.24
Technician 260 $ 23.08 $ 6,000.80
Clerical 4 $ 19.23 $ 76.92
Direct Salary Total
$ 15,281.00
Overhead (150.38%)
Fee (15%)
Reimbursables (see attached breakdown)
$ 22,979.57
$ 5,739.09
$ 10,500.00
Task'S.D Total m ��..=
$ �` 499:66
Grad,Totala,
.$ 115;639 D7r.
6/24/2005
Exhibit D
Reimbursable Breakdown
Project:
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue / Hardie Avenue
Phase 1
�1?4G
♦ Architecture
Landscape Architecture
♦ Civil Engineering
Reimbursable Breakdown
TASK 1.0 - Management / Coordination / Administration
Reproduction $ 100.00
Task 1:0 Total;
VV
TASK 2.0 - Field Survey and Base Mapping
Reproduction $ 100.00
CTS Engineers $ 38,960.00
Title Report $ 400.00
APS (Locate Service) Budget $ 5,000.00
;Task 0 Total <,
$4
4,460�00
TASK 3.0 - Property Owner Coordination
Reproduction
TASK 4.0 - Utility Coordination
Reproduction
$ 200.00
$ 100.00
Task 4 flTofalbtk
TASK 5.0 - Plan Layout and ROW Determination
Reproduction $ 500.00
Mirai (Traffic Analysis) Budget $ 5,000.00
DMJM Harris (BNSF Coordination) Budget $ 5,000.00
Task 5.OTotal'; _ z $:10,50000`
6/24/2005
C SE.gineers, Inn
Hardie Avenue SW
ClientKPG/City of Renton
MANHOUR AND COST ESTIMATE
Date: 08-Jun-05
TASK I S Mgr I Proj S I CADD I Sure CI Sury I I Sury RI TOTAL I COST
Sunset to Rainier, Sth to 7th mapped
Est_ Hz, vertical control I 2 I 12 0 20 20 0 54 $4,377
Full Topographic mapping 4 44 124 120 120 40 452 $34,583
SUBTOTAL
Direct Cost-ROS fee
6 1 56 1 124 1 140 1 140 40 506 f S 38,960
f $0
This estimate made for the mapping of Hardie Avenue according to the limits shown on the aerial map for
the KPG meeting of 6/09/05. Property lines will be shown based on field locations and best available
evidence, including recorded surveys and WSDOT right of way plans. The mapping will be prepared to
City of Renton horizontal and vertical control, to KPG standard layers and linetypes; the contour interval
will be .5 feet, with inverts measured where attainable. Utilities will be shown based on field evidence
and City and franchise utility records, inverts will not be obtained at this time.
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the fo13o«-1ng portions of the work of this AGREEMENT:
CTS Engineers (Survey)
APS Utility Locates
DMJM Harris tru aural En ineering)
Mirai Associates (Traffic Engineering)
DOT Form 14M89 EF Exhib t G
Rei'6105
Exhibit H
T itle VI Assurances
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in
interest agrees as follows:
Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to
non-discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS'), which
are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
2. Non-discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during the AGREEMENT, shall
not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of
sub -consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT shall not
participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
REGULATIONS, including employment practices when the AGREEMENT covers a program set forth in
Appendix B of the REGULATIONS.
Solicitations for Sub -consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations either
by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a
sub -contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub -consultant or
supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT'S obligations under this
AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, or
national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by AGENCY, STATE or the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such REGULATIONS, orders
and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the exclusive possession of
another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall so certify to the AGENCY,
STATE or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT'S non-compliance with the
non-discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT
sanctions as it, the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT
complies, and/or,
Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H
Revised 6/05
Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) in
every sub -contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall take such action with
respect to any sub -consultant or procurement as the AGENCY, STATE or FHWA may direct as a means of
enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation
with a sub -consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request the AGENCY
and the STATE enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY and the STATE and, in
addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests
of the United States.
Exhibit I
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the total
work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work
completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is to
the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work
completed
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of temunation of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of termination
of this AGREEMENT.
DOT Form 14M89 EF Exhibit I
Revised 6/05
Exhibit J
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a nature
that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution and/or cost
recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage due to the
alleged error by the consultant.
Step 1 — Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager
At the fast indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the Agency's
project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential design
error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer should be
informed and involved in these procedures. (Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer may
appoint an agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as directly involved in the
project, to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.)
Step 2 - Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s)
After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed
documentation than is normally required on the project. Examples include: all decisions and descriptions of
work; photographs, records of labor, materials and equipment.
Step 3 — Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s)
If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project
manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged
error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the
consultant should be represented by their project manger and any personnel (including sub -consultants)
deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue.
Step 4 — Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant
After the meeting(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design
error(s), there are three possible scenarios:
It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If
this is the case, then the process will not proceed beyond this point_
It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. If this
is the case, then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their
representatives, negotiate a settlement with the consultant. The settlement would be
paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from the consultant's agreement
with the agency for the services on the project in which
the design error took place. The agency is to provide H&LP, through the Region
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J
Revised 6105
Local Programs Engineer, a summary of the settlement for review and to make
adjustments, if any, as to bow the settlement affects federal reimbursements. No
further action is required.
There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The
consultant may request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to
the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer for review. If the Director of
Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal counsel, is not able
to reach mutual agreement with the consultant, proceed to Step 5.
Step 5 — Forward Documents to Highways and Local Programs
For federally funded projects all available information, including costs, should be forwarded through
the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer to H&LP for their review and consultation with the
FHWA. H&LP will meet with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the alleged
design error(s), and attempt to find a resolution to the issue. If necessary, H&LP will request assistance
from the Attorney GeneraI's Office for legal interpretation. H&LP will also identify how the alleged
error(s) affects eligibility of project costs for federal reimbursement.
If mutual agreement is reached, the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work
and costs to reflect the agreed upon resolution. H&LP, in consultation with FHWA, will
identify the amount of federal participation in the agreed upon
resolution of the issue.
If mutual agreement is not reached, the agency and consultant may seek settlement
by arbitration or by litigation.
Exhibit K
Consultant Claim Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s) on a consultant agreement. The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claim(s) are a total of
$1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the Director of
Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s) that total $1,000 or
less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential claim by
the consultant.
Step I — Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of the
agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed is the
request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following:
• Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope;
• Summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work; and
Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the
agreement scope of work.
Step 2 — Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim. If the
FHWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the Agency's
recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs
'through the Region Local Programs Engineer. If the claira is not eligible for federal participation, payment
wi11 need to be from agency funds.
If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Highways and
Local Programs (if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a request
memo, including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement, or create a
new agreement for the claim. After the request has been approved, the Agency shall write the supplement
and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final
payment for the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed regarding the claim procedures.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit K
Revised 6/05
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Step 3 — Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a summary
for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
• Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
• Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the
claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs
associated with the additional work;
• Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the
consultant's claim(s);
• Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and
• Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4 — Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency
Documentation
The Director of Pubic Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or
disapprove the claim, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or Commission
approval (as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project involves federal
participation, obtain concurrence from WSDOT Highways and Local Programs and FHWA regarding
final settlement of the claim. If the claim is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to
be from agency funds.
Step 5 — Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their final
decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim(s)
and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6 — Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s)
The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the
claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit.
I hereby certify that I am Prin
representative of the firm of
Exhibit M-1(a)
Certification Of Consultant
KPG. Inc.
Project No.
Local Agency
and duly authorized
whose address is
753 9th Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage; brokerage, contingent fee, or other
consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the
above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure the AGREEMENT;
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the
services of any fine or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm. organization or person (other than a bona fide employee
working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT;
except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration; U.�
connection -Mth this AGREEMENT involving participation c
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal ar.
DOT Form 140-089 EF ExhibB M-1(a)
Revsed W05
Exhibit M-1(b)
Certification Of Agency Official
I hereby certiA, that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of Penton
Washington, and that the consulting firm or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or
(b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any):
I acknouledae that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway fimds, and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-I(b)
Revise 6/05
Signature 44 �
Exhibit M-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters -Primary Covered Transactions
I. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it and its principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state; or local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement,
theft, forgery; bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving
stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (I)(B). of this
certification; and
D. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state; or local) tenninated for cause or default.
U. 'Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal -
Consultant (Firm):
,7 o r
(Date)
DOT Form 14D-089 EF Exhibit A-2
Revised 6.705
Exhibit M-3
Certification Regarding Tiie Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knoNllv,ledge and belief; that:
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency; a
member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of
any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Cong ess, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection
with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and
submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to
file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more
than $100,000 for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall
require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed
$100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm):
(6712"7,10
( ate)
DOT Form 14a-089 EF Exhibit M-s
Revised W05
Exhibit M-4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Exhibit D
are accurate; complete, and current as of June 24, 2005 **. This certification includes
the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Finn KPG, Inc.
Name P. Joseph Giacobazzi, PE
Title Principal
Date of Execution***
* Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g.. RFP No.).
** Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement was
reached.
*** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit W-4
Rev ced M5
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
IMA _ 7h11 CIV VCAM TIM
Rainier Ave. Improvements - S 4th PI to S 2nd St
Functional Classification: Principal a Minor Fund: 317
Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM
Proj. Length: 0.4 miles Proj: 12501
RANK: 7 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430 7223
DESCRIPTION:
STATUS:
Rebuild sidewalks including curb and gutters; add pedestrian -scale illumination, bollards (at crossings),
Anticipated design contract to be authorized in mid- to late 2005. Based upon staff
transit facility improvements (shelters, benches, info kiosks), planted buffer strips and landscaped
discussions, Sound Transit is anticipated to be a key funding partner. Funding shown in
medians, and eastbound transit cue jump at S 3rd St.
2009-2011 will move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit.
JUSTIFICATION:
CHANGES:
Rainier Ave. is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of
New project. Approximately $10,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options: the
nfrasructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non -motorized and transit -based travel.
funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave. project by Council process.
Funding shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit
Board approval of funds.
Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006
une Unfunded
Six Year Program
ITEM
Programmed
Sent in 2004
2005
Total
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
EXPENSES:
Project Development
Precon En /Admin
607,000
10,000
597,000
597,000
R-O-W includes Admin
1 600 000
1,600,000
1,600,000
Construction Contract Fee
3,800,000
3,800,000
1,800,000
2 000 000
Construction En /Admin
303,000
303,000
143 000
160.000
Other
TOTAL EXPENSES
SOURCES OF FUNDS:
6,310,000
10,000
6,300,000
2,197,000
1,943,000
21160,000
Vehicle Fuel Tax
110,000
110,000
110,000
Business License Fee
Proposed Fund Balance
310,000
1,443,000
10,000
300,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
Grants In -Hand
1,443,000
600,000
418 000
425 C00
Mitigation In -Hand
Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed
1,447,000
1,447,000
497,000
425,000
525,000
Other In -Hand
Grants Proposed
Mitiqlation Proposed
L.I.D.'s Proposed
Other Proposed S. Transit
Undetermined
3,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
11000,000
1,000,000
TOTAL SOURCES I
6,3V,0001
10,0001
6,300,000
2,197,0001
2,160,0001
C&M2005 30 AM
5-7 DRAFT
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
Onna 'n44 eiv vITAM rrn
Hardie Ave. SW Transit / Multimodal Improvements Functional Classification: Principal 8 Minor Fund: 317
Proj. Length: 0.7 miles Proj: 12502
Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM
RANK: 8 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223
DESCRIPTION:
STATUS:
Add Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes in both directions; rebuild the Hardie railroad bridge;add non-
Design contract authorization anticipated mid- to late 2005. Based upon staff discussions,
motorized facilities, i.e., multimodal trail, northbound transit -only signal at Rainier and Hardie, curb gutter
Sound Transit is anticipated to be a key funding partner. Funding shown in 2009-2011 will
sidewalks between Sunset Blvd. and Rainier Ave. S.
move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit.
JUSTIFICATION:
CHANGES:
Regional transit agencies have expressed a desire to partner with the City to design and build systematic
New project. Approximately $190,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options; the
transit improvements throughout Renton for the purposes of reducing travel times and improving speed
funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave. project by Council process.
and reliability for routes serving Renton. Additionally, there is a need for improved non -motorized facilities
Hardie Ave. SW will be changed from a Collector Arterial to a Minor Arterial. Funding
providing north to south connections. There are also safety benefits for all by replacing the substandard
shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit Board
railroad bridge over Hardie south of SW 5th PI.
approval of funds.
Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006
Funded : 3,331,0001 Unfunded : 12.000.00
Six Year Program
ITEM
Programmed
Spent In 2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
EXPENSES:Total
Project Development
Precon En /Admin
1,667,000
190,000
1,477,000
1,077,000,
400,000
R-O-W includes Admin
2,423,000
2,423,000
1,500,000
923,000
Construction Contract Fee
10,413,000
10,413,000
4,413.000
6,000,000
Construction En /Admin
834,000
834,000
334 000
500 000
Other
TOTAL EXPENSES
SOURCES U D :
15,337 000
190 000
15147,000
2,577,000
6 070 000
6,500,000
Vehicle Fuel Tax
155 000
155,000
155,000
Business License Fee
Proposed Fund Balance
465 000
862 000
465,000
200,0001
100 000
165,000
Grants In -Hand
862,000
77,000
475,000
310,000
Mitigation In -Hand
Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed
1,855,000
190,000,
1 665 000
795,000
870,000
Other In -Hand
Grants Proposed
Miti ation Proposed
L.I.D.'s Proposed
Other Proposed S. Transit
Undetermined
12,00,000
1
12,000000
2 300 000
4,700,000
5.000.000
TOTAL SOURCES
15,337,0001
190,0001
15147 000 1
2,577,0001
6,070,000
8 500 000
anamm 11:30AY
6.8 DRAFT
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
5 -16 DRAFT owrj= «Iow
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al N:
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of. August 1, 2005
Dept/Div/Board.. Technical Services
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Karen McFarland (ext. 7209)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Determination of Compensation for Elmhurst Plat Street
Correspondence..
Vacation (VAC-04-007; Three portions of Bremerton
Ordinance .............
Ave NE, south of NE 4th Street)
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue paper
Study Sessions......
Appraisal Review Comments
Information.........
Map Exhibits (2)
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $5,170.00
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
An appraisal has been submitted by Don Merlino on behalf of Liberty Ridge LLC, for acceptance and
determination of compensation due the City for the area to be vacated in Street Vacation VAC-04-
007. The appraisal provides a fair market value estimate of this area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the appraisal and set compensation for Street Vacation VAC-04-007 at $5,170.00 for the three
portions of Bremerton Ave NE, south of NE 4th Street, approximately 3,998 square feet.
H:\File Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-25 - Street Vacations From 1990 and Forward\0046\compensation\agbi110705.doc\KMtp
PLANNING/BUILDING/
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
�NT� M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 15, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
U�
VIA: AoK Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
l
FROM: Gregg ZimmermarVA ministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist (ext. 7209)
SUBJECT: Determination of Compensation for Elmhurst Plat Street
Vacation (VAC-04-007; Portions of Bremerton Ave NE,
south of NE 4th Street)
ISSUE:
An appraisal has been submitted by Don Merlino on behalf of Liberty Ridge LLC for acceptance
and determination of compensation due the City for the area to be vacated in Street Vacation
VAC-04-007. The appraisal provides a fair market value estimate of this area.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the appraisal and set compensation for Street Vacation VAC-05-001 at $5,170.00.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Street Vacation request VAC-04-007 was approved on February 28, 2005, for the three portions
of Bremerton Ave NE, south of NE 4th Street, approximately 3,998 square feet.
On July 6, 2005, an appraisal was submitted by Don Merlino on behalf of Liberty Ridge LLC for
the area to be vacated. Staff has reviewed the appraisal and concludes that the appraisal meets
industry standards. The appraisal report provides a fair market value of $5,170.00 for
approximately 3,998 square feet of right-of-way to be vacated. Staff believes the estimate
determined in the appraisal represents a reasonable and fair market value for property that can be
developed in the area.
CouncilNAC04-007
July 15, 2005
Page 2 of 2
State Law and City Code allow for compensation in the amount of the full -appraised value if a
street or alley has been a dedicated public right-of-way for twenty-five years or more. The right-
of-way included in this vacation has been dedicated public right-of-way for more than twenty-
five years and State Law and City Code, therefore, allow for compensation amounts to be set at
the full -appraised values.
CONCLUSION:
Staff has reviewed the appraisal submitted by Don Merlino on behalf of Liberty Ridge LLC and
concludes that the appraisal meets industry standards. The Planning/Building/Public Works
Department recommends that Council accept the appraisal and set compensation for Street
Vacation VAC-04-007 at $5,170.00 for the approximately 3,998 square feet of right-of-way.
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
HAFile Sys\PRM - Property Services Administration\PRM-25 - Street Vacations From 1990 and
Forward\0046\compensation\issuepaper0705 Elmhurst.doc\KLMtp
APPRAISAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Reviewed by: Karen McFarland, Utility Systems Division/Technical Services
Effective Date of Appraisal: June 27, 2005
Prepared by: Harry B. Holzauer, MAI
Integra Realty Resources — Seattle
Property: Three portions of Bremerton Ave NE south of NE 4th Street totaling approximately 3,998
square feet
(Street Vacation File No. VAC-04-007)
GENERAL:
The report contained the necessary analysis for the appraiser to form an opinion of the fair market value of
that portion of right-of-way to be vacated. The report indicated that the right-of-way being vacated has a
highest and best use of assemblage with the adjacent properties.
QUALIFIED APPRAISER
The appraiser is experienced and a well -qualified state certified appraiser.
PROPERTY VALUATION
Since the subject property is Right -of -Way, it is not assessed for taxes by the King County Assessor. The
sales comparison approach was the only applicable method for valuation and, thus, was the method used for
this valuation. The fair market value was based upon direct comparison with recent sales of similar
properties.
FIELD INSPECTION
An inspection of the subject property and all comparables was made by the appraiser.
COMPARABLE SALES
The fair market value was determined based upon direct comparison with recent sales of similar properties
within a reasonable distance of the subject site. The adjustments to the comparable sales were found to be
within a reasonable range of the subject site valuation.
CONCLUSION
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that the Council accept the appraised value
of the subject land of $5,170.00 for the three portions of Bremerton Ave NE south of NE 4th Street
approximately 3,998 square feet.
Vicinity Map
Street Vacation VAC--04--007
Petitioner: Liberty Ridge, LLC
r�r`r=� I I f � crrttrr�f j
NE 4th St
� Bremerton Ave NE ---
1�f Street Vacations
' 14flll
r-r SE 2nd P1 '
Vicinity Map
0 600 1200
1:7200
Technical Services
Planning//Building/Public Works
!L NcFarllaud
TO )ao. 19. 2005
t
F--,A t b& T)
Map Exhibit
i
G
Lull —
PARCEL NO.
5182100050
�.. C7. �1
4 PARCEL NO.
51B2100049
PARCEL NO.
5182100051
I
W
0
:L
cl U
r- Q
W
n`
Q
Z lf'i
Q) Z�
_J U
w
�---{{ w Ln
I 0
Q)
Q)
� z
0
Lu
wa
LZ u
F— Q
I �tiN H wo
��Q�oF wAsylyo
tq ti c
__....._ 100 200 9F3 965 Q�w
i ro tstE 5�
SCALE l"— 100' EXPIREs5-23-2007
Sent By: ; 206 284 6625; Jul-15-05 11:22AM; Page 1/1
BDJS Associates, LLC �orres pondence S- l -a00.5
(,(f; lt�ies Oversla�n� Rc ucsf
�e�mburserrtetf
July 12, 2005 CF%<< It Ud-OS-00/1
Ike—fer 40
Jan Illian ' (?Ornrn i-{'fee
City Councilmember's
1055 South; Brady Way
Renton, WA 98055
SUBJECT: - Urban Craft Reimbursement for Water and Sewer.
Dear Jan & City Councilmember's:
Thank you for you recent response regarding the cost overruns for the water &
sewer lines: in Olympia Ave NE.
As you are aware, the costs for completing this work have exceeded the
approved maximum reimbursement amount.
We have included for your review a copy of the Actual cost vs, the original
estimates iy Jaeger Engineering.
The balance for the City's portion of the work is $51,264-24.
Please submit this request to the city council for approval as soon as possible.
If you have; any questions regarding the costs or estimates that were provided by
the engineor and contractor please do not hesitate to call.
Sincer
Fin ay.
Managing Partner BDJS Associates
(206) 284-7603
Ictoo 1JiL4e.oi-n
'eta Hie, WA 9 3 ill
Cc: Jan ilian
Abdoul Gafour
Dava Christianson
Kayren Kittrick
Neil;Watts
19W West Nickerson #116-168 Seethe, WA 95110
sent By: ; 206 284 6625; Jul-15-05 11:02AM; Page 1/2
253 850 0155
Jul 15 05 09:072James Jaeger
JAEGER ENGINEERING
.94195.2
F'lioNg i2g 850.0934 FAX (253) 85Cf-01.SS 1
July 14, 2005
Dave Christianson
City of Renton Public Works
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA. 98055
Project: Urban Crafts - Olympia Ave_
Final Construction Costs for Public Improvements
Dave,
The construction at the Urban Craft project is nearing cluded r
g completion.
Thents
work that was performed within Olympia Ave. NE
to the Olympia Ave. infrastructure in addition to those that would normally
be requited for the project and will benefit the public/City. Those
improvements included a water and sewer main installation that
extended north of the andsite's frontage to service eAsting sewer mains replaced existing osub-stants on idarda
Ave. me new water
systems that have been abandoned,
The City has agreed to the financial responsibility for the total cost of the
water and sewer systems in that portion of Olympia Ave. that is north of .
the site.. the City also agreed to pay for 50% of the cost of the water and
sewer systems within
hesite frontage along of the wate a d sew r man construction
o Ave. I had
mate
prepared an estimate
in May,
2003, that was used to discuss the work and establish costs.
I have now reviewed the actual construction costs for the project that are
being submitted for reimbursement by the City. The City had set a by d00 t
of $75,QW for the work. The requested reimbursement is opp o
The increase is due to a number of factors. The cost of materials,
particuiorly steel pipe, has tripled in the last 2 years. The estimated unit
costs for the water and sewer main have tripled due to the materials
increosie and also due to the reconstruction of the road. The estimated
unit costs did not include the gravel trench backfill, testing, compaction,
etc. Also, the locates for the a)dsting water and sewer services to the
houses/businesses along Olympia Ave. have been factored into the unit
costs. the cost for re -surfacing the road was also higher due to constraints
by existing drainage and driveways.
The deiveloper has prepared a table that compares the actual costs and
the estimated costs using similar line items. I have reviewed the actual ..
costs and have compared them to the estimates. 1 agree that the actual
Sent By: ; 206 284 6625; Jul-15-05 11:02AM; Page 2/2
263 eK0 0155 _} 206 284 6825; r'GIHd
Received; 7/15/05 Q:67AM; 253 950 0155 P.2
Jul 15 05 09:07a James Jaeger
costs are representative of the work that wasUprerf o the and r ut ties d
by unforeseen job site conditions, the uncertainty
and the industry cost increases. Please feel free to tali or meet with me to
discuss any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
ga��q - 90A�
James Jaeger
BDJS Associates LLC
1900 W Nickerson PMB 116-168
Seattle WA 98119
Phone (206) 284-7603 Fax(206) 284-6625
TO:
Abdoul Gafour
City Of Renton
Public Works Department
Utilities Systems - Fifth Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98055
Phone (425) 430-7210 Fax (425) 430-7241
COMMENTS OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
SHIP TO:
INVOICE
INVOICE #442-0305-02
DATE: MAY 20, 2005
SALESPERSON P.O. NUMBER REQUISITIONER SHIPPED VIA F.O.B. POINT TERMS
Due on receipt
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
90.50 LF
8" D.I. Water main and fittings (181 LF on property frontage split
50/50 with Contractor and City of Renton)
115.46
10,449.13
130 LF
8" D.I. Water main and fittings north of property frontage
115.46
15,009.80
1 ea
New fire hydrant assembly
2,795.00
2,795.00
0.5 ea
Connection to the existing main (Cost split with Contractor and City of
Renton 50/50)
7,857.00
3,928.50
153.5 LF
8" PVC sewer main (307 LF on property frontage split 50/50 with
Contractor and City of Renton)
106.19
16,300.17
91 LF
8" PVC Sewer main north of property frontage
106.19
9,663.29
0.5 ea
Man hole split 50/50 with Contractor and City of Renton
3,642.00
1,821.00
1 ea
Man hole City of Renton Only
3,642.00
3,642.00
8 ea
Side sewer connections
1,228.00
9,824.00
ea
Connection to existing sewer (50/50 split between Contractor and City
.05
of Renton
1,200.00
600.00
SUBTOTAL
74,032.89
SALES TAX
SHIPPING & HANDLING
TOTAL DUE
N
BDJS Associates LLC
1900 W Nickerson PMB 116-168
Seattle WA 98119
Phone (206) 284-7603 Fax (206) 284-6625
TO:
Abdoul Gafour
City Of Renton
Public Works Department
Utilities Systems — Fifth Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98055
Phone (425) 430-7210 Fax (425) 430-7241
COMMENTS OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
SHIP TO:
INVOICE
INVOICE #442-0305-02
DATE: MAY 20, 2005
SALESPERSON P.O. NUMBER REQUISITIONER SHIPPED VIA 7F.O.B. POINT TERMS
Due on receipt
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
4711 SF
Street restoration along frontage of property City of Renton portion
3.25
15,310.75
3639 SF
Street restoration north of project 95' x 38.31'
3.25
11,826.75
0.5 ea
Traffic Control (50/50 split with between Contractor and City of
Renton)
5,000.00
2,500.00
0.5 ea
Signage and Striping (50/50 split between Contractor and City of
Renton)
500.00
250.00
0.5 ea
Demolition and disposal (50/50) split between Contractor and City of
Renton)
3,609.99
1,805.00
0.5 ea
Engineering and plan preparation (50/50 split between Contractor and
City of Renton)
2,500.00
1,250.00
0.5 ea
Surveying and as-builts (50/50 split between Contractor and City of
Renton)
2,930.00
1,465.00
0.5 ea
Construction management(50/50 split between Contractor and City of
Renton)
11,132.72
5,566.36
SUBTOTAL
114,006.74
SALES TAX
10,932.59
SHIPPING & HANDLING
TOTAL DUE
$124,039.34
Make all checks payable to BDJS Associates LLC
If you have any questions concerning this invoice, contact Alan Fossum, (425) 957-1234, Email: alanf@fossumconstruction.com
Thank you for your business! /
�v
b�
v
FjFOSSUM
C O N S T R U C T I O N
Unit Calculations
City of Renton
City Clerk's Office
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98005
Linear footage Cost Calculations:
p: 425.957.1234 f: 425.401.1830
e: info@fossumconstruction.com
www.fossumconstruction.com
2005 152n° Place SE
Bellevue, WA 98007
February 14, 2005
Job 457
Urban Crafts Utility Work
(Creative Work Space)
Permit U031356
401 Olympia Ave, Renton WA
Part One
LF of Owners private 8" D.I. water main
LF of City's portion of 8" D.I. water main
LF Shared cost Owner/City 8" D.I. water main
Total LF of water 8'D.I. water main
LF City's portion of 8" PVC sewer main
LF shared portion of owner/city 8" PVC sewer main
Total LF of sewer 8" PVC sewer main
= 96 If
= 181 If
= 130 If
= 407 If
= 91 If
= 307 If
= 398 If
Total LF of sewer and water mains 407 If + 398 If = 805 If.
Total costs that applied to both sewer and water (gravel fill etc) = $5,687,00.
Cost per If to be applied to both water and sewer mains. $5,687.00 / 8051f = $7.06 Per If.
Total Costs for 8" D.I. water main and fittings = $44,119.00.
Costs per If for 8" D.I. water main $44,119.00 / 407 If = 108.40 + 7.09 = $115.16 per If.
Total Costs for 8" PVC sewer main = $39,452.00.
Costs per If for 8" PVC sewer main $39,452.00 / 398 If = 99.13 + 7.09 = $106.19 per If.
Note: Linear Feet is based on actual Measurements.
Square Footage Cost Calculations:
Square Feet of Asphalt that is the owners responsibility = 6,300 sqft
Square Feet of Asphalt City's responsibility along frontage of Property = 4,711 sqft
Square Feet of Asphalt City's Responsibility North of Project = 3,639 s-qft
Total Square Feet of asphalt per Northwest Asphalt = 14,650 sqft
Total Costs of New Asphalt including grading and fill $47,609.80
Cost per Square Foot for New Asphalt = $47,609.80/14,650sgft = 3.25 per SgFt
POSSUM
C O N S T R U C T I O N
City of Renton
City Clerk's Office
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98005
p: 425.957.1234 f: 425.401.1830
e: info@fossumconstruction.com
www.fossumconstruction.com
2005 152ntl Place SE
Bellevue, WA 98007
Part 2
Job 457
Urban Crafts Utility Work
(Creative Work Space)
Permit U031356
401 Olympia Ave, Renton WA
Billing for City Portion of Utility Improvements:
Water
8" D.I. Water Main and fittings
181 LF
$ 115.46
= $ 20,898.26
@
50%=
$10,449.13
8" D.I. Water Main and fittings
130LF
$ 115.46
= $ 15,009.80
@
100%=
$15,009.80
New Fire Hydrant Assembly
1 Ea
$ 2,795.00
= $ 2,795.00
@
100%=
$ 2,795.00
Estimated service connection/stubs
0 Ea
$ -
= $ -
@
100% =
$ -
Connection to the Existing main
1 Ea
$ 7,857.00
= $ 7,857.00
@
50% =
$ 3,928.50
Total Water
=
$32,182.43
Sewer
8" PVC sewer main
307 LF
$ 106.19
= $ 32,600.33
@
50%=
$16,300.17
8" PVC sewer main
91 LF
$ 106.19
= $ 9,663.29
@
100%=
$ 9,663.29
Man Hole
1 Ea
$ 3,642.00
= $ 3,642.00
@
50% =
$ 1,821.00
Man Hole
1 Ea
$ 3,642.00
= $ 3,642.00
@
100%=
$ 3,642.00
Estimated side sewer connections
8 Ea
$ 1,228.00
= $ 9,824.00
@
100%=
$ 9,824.00
connection to existing sewer
1 Ea
$ 1,200.00
= $ 1,200.00
@
50%=
$ 600.00
Total Sewer
=
$41,850.46
Street Restoration
Along Frontage 315'x14.96'
4711 sf
$ 3.25
= $ 15,310.75
@
100%=
$15,310.75
North of Project 95'x38.31'
3639 sf
$ 3.25
= $ 11,826.75
@
100% =
$11,826.75
Traffic control
1 ea
$ 5,000.00
= $ 5,000.00
@
50%=
$ 2,500.00
Signage and striping
1 ea
$ 500.00
= $ 500.00
@
50% =
$ 250.00
Demolition and disposal
1 ea
$ 3,609.99
= $ 3,609.99
@
50%=
$ 1,805.00
Total Road
=
$31,692.50
Total Hard Costs
$105,725.38
Miscellaneous Costs
Engineering and Plan Preparation
1 Ea
$ 2,500.00
= $ 2,500.00
@
50%=
$ 1,250.00
Surveying and As-Builts
1 Ea
$ 2,930.00
= $ 2,930.00
@
50%=
$ 1,465.00
Construction Management
1 Ea
$11,132.72
= $ 11,132.72
@
50%=
$ 5,566.36
10% Contingencies
1 Pct
$ -
_ $ -
@
50% =
$ -
Total Miscellaneous =
$ 8,281.36
Total Cost to City of Renton
=
$114,006.74
050520 CreWor CitRen Utilmp Invoice
As ver 2.doc
City of Renton
Sewer 8. Water Improvements
City Estimate Per Jaeger Engineering dated May 12003
Fassum Construction Costs
Water
Water
8' D.I. Water Main and fittings
215 LF
S 32.00 - 3
6.880.00 50% - S
3.440.00
8' O.I. Water Main and fittings
181 LF
S 115.46 ■
S 20.898.26 ® 50% =
$ 10,449.13
W D.I. Water Main and f4tings
911 LF
S 32.00 ■ $
3,136.00 Q 100%- $
3.136.00
8' D.I. Water Main and fittings
130 LF
S 115.46 -
S 15,009,80 100% =
S 15,009.80
New Fire Hydrant Assembly
1 Ea
S 2,200.00 - $
2,200.00 100% - $
2,200.00
New Fire Hydrant Assembly
1 Ea
S 2,795.00 ■
3 2,795.00 ® 100% .
$ 2,795.00
Estimated servico connectlon/stubs
5 Ea
$ 400.00 - S
2,000.00 100%. $
2,000.00
Estimated service connedion/slubs
0 Ea
3 - =
S Q 100% •
$ -
Connection to the Existing main
1 Ea
S 1,000.00 = $
1,000.00 a 50% a S
5W.00
Connection to the Existing main
1 Ea
S 7,657.00 -
S 7,857.00 50% =
S 3,928.50
Total Water - S
11.276.00
Total Water =
$ 32,182.43
Sewer
Sewer
8' PVC sewer main
308 LF
$ 40.00 - $
12,320.00 C 50% - S
6.160.00
8' PVC sewer main
307 LF
S 106.19 -
$ 32.600.33 @ 50% =
$ 16,300.17
8' PVC sewer main
92 LF
$ 40.00 - S
3,660.00 Q 100% = S
3.680.00
8' PVC sewer main
91 LF
S 106.19 =
$ 9.663.29 100% =
$ 9,663.29
Man Hole
1 Ea
S 2.400.00 = S
2,400.00 Q 50% = S
1,200.00
Man Hole
1 Ea
S 3,642.00 =
$ 3,642.00 Q 50% =
$ 1,821.00
Man Hole
1 Ea
S 2.400.00 = S
2,400.00 Q 100% - $
2,400.00
Man Hole
1 Ea
$ 3,642.00 =
$ 3.642.00 @ 100% =
$ 3,642.00
Estimated side sewer connections
8 Ea
S 800.00 - $
6,400.00 @ 100% - $
6,400.00
Estimated side sewer connections
8 Ea
$ 1.228.00 =
$ 9.824.00 100% -
$ 9,824.00
connection to existing sewer
1 Ea
$ 1.000.00 - $
1,000.00 Q 50% = $
500.00
connection to existing sewer
1 Ea
$ 1,200.00 =
$ 1.200.00 50% =
S 600.00
Total Sewer = $
20,340. 00
Total Sewer -
S 41.850.46
Street Restoration
Street Restoration
Along Frontage 345'x10'
3450 sf
$ 2.50 - S
6,625.00 ® 100% - S
8,625.00
Along Frontage 315'x14.96'
4711 sf
5 3.25 -
S 15.310.75 100% -
S 15.310.75
North of Project 951t20'
1900 sf
$ 2.50 ■ S
4.750.00 Q 100% - S
4.750.00
Noah of Project 95-x38.31'
3639 sf
S 3.25 -
S 11,826.75 ® 100% -
$ 11.826.75
Traffic control
1 ea
$ 5.000.00 - $
5.000.00 ® 50% - S
2.500.00
Traffic control
1 ea
$ 5,000.00 e
$ 5.000.00 ® 50% =
$ 2.500.00
Signage and striping
1 ea
3 500.00 - $
500.00 ® 50% - S
250.00
Slgnage and striping
1 ea
$ 500.00 -
S 500.00 50% =
$ 250.00
Demolition and disposal
1 ea
S 3.000.00 - S
3.000.00 120 50% - $
1.500.00
Demolition and disposal
1 ea
S 3.609.99 =
$ 3.609.99 t$ 50% =
$ 1,805.00
Total Road - $
17,625.00
Total Road =
S 31,692-50
Total Hard Costs $
49,241.00
Total Hard Costs
$105.725.38
Miscellaneous Costs
Miscellaneous Costs
Engineering and Plan Preparation
1 Ea
S 2,500.00 = S
2,500.00 Q 50% = 3
1.250.00
Engineering and Plan Preparation
rep
1 Ea
S 2.500.00 -
$ 2.5W.00 @ 50% =
S 1,250.00
Surveying and As-Buffts
1 Fa
$ 2,000.00 = $
2,000.00 Q 506/. = S
1,000.00
Surveying and As-Bu18s
1 Ea
S 2.930.00 -
$ 2.930.00 ® 50% -
$ 1,465.00
Construction Management
1 Ea
$ 3,500.00 - S
3,500.00 ® 50% - S
1.750.00
Construction Management
1 Ea
S 11.132.72 -
S 11.132.72 50% -
S 5,566.36
10%Contirgencies
1 Pct
$ 5.000.00 - S
5.000.00 4M 50Y. s S
2,500.00
10%Contingencies
1 Pct
S - =
S 50% =
$
Total Miscellaneous - $
4,500.00
Total Miscellaneous -
$ 8,281.36
Total Estimated Cost to City = $ 55,741.00
o
Total Cost to City -
$114,006.74
050520 CreWor CltRen estimate Fosoon Costs Comparison dbs verl.xls
It f
MEMO
N&C Investments LLC
July 18, 2005
City of Renton
City Council
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Morris Avenue Townhomes
C{'r.
JI;,
513 South 2rd Street, Renton WA
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL ef DEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATION FEES
v
T'o wh VE
Remarks/Notes:
Per section 4-1-210 of the land use code, we are writing this memo to request approval
from the City Council to waive the building permit fees, utility system development
charges, Public works plan review and inspection fees, and impact mitigation fees.
Our project is an Eight unit townhome in the CD zone. Copies of the floorplans and a
photo of a building that provides the level of finish and style we are proposing for this
property have been attached.
We feel this project will complement and improve the current development plan in
Downtown Renton that will benefit the local community for years to come.
Sincerely,
Evan Chan
Project Manager
N&C Investments LLC
Cc: Jill Hall, Associate Planner, City of Renton
7432 SE 27"' Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040
Phone: (206) 236-9989 Fax (206) 236-0328
n
s
El MORRIS AVE. SOUTH
W W -W W
a
a n
p0
j EA -
U► €
rn �n ► j A.
Y= �s
T'
=ia_ '
ni
7p n
Jc A
X �
Pn
T
1
3
a
n
2;1x EVAN CHAN
$ e o MORRIS AVENUE
D ' ` < TOWNHOMES 7432 S.E. 27th STREET
m CD
o m MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
IN) z m Z PH. (206) 236-9989
a Zi -0328
FX.(206)236 x
— ■ 1_1 L___J■ -----� -- ------------
nBLDG I - LOWER FLOOR PLAN
0
co
w�W
�o CON
.cQ COrn
Zr—J m(p
Q N N N
= W cp
Z�C) NN
Q
Cl) W
w
Wti rG dU_
W
ZN
W W
Q 5
�O
��
00
DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
BLDGI•LEVEL I
PPoiEGi M: owo]
JUKE!I,
cHErum ev:
A201
scuE. v .. l,.o.
sG�E �Mww05ISCOPOxOLY.
2M
EVAN CHAN
m
"o
m
MORRISAVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
fm
M
oL
TOWNHOMES
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
KZ
m
PH. (206) 236-9989
o
z
FX. (206) 236-0328
gg ��
N
EVAN CHAN
o
m
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
m
m o
r m
MORRIS AVENUE
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
c
TOWNHOMES
KZ
m Z
PH. (206) 236-9989
Zi
FX. (206) 236-0328
GI
DC):,
7!
Z
- - - -
- - - - - -
- -
I
------------
T
II
----------
II
(D�-'
-w-;
_
4z-
m'i
it" :yt
EVAN CHAN
MORRIS AVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
IV
m
-m 0
TOWNHOMES
G)
K Z
PH. (206) 236-9989
FX (206) 236-0328
�IJ
i 4 a
EVAN CHAN
mr
m
mo MORRIS AVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
n T
m
V TOWNHOMES
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 ¢
m
o
PH. (206) 236-9989
;��
+
FX. (206) 236-0328
xfl
m
a
�
EVAN CHAN I
€
U'
iryl
o
MORRIS AVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
I
f�
At
cil
��
��
<—
>-
m
TOWNHOMES
MERCER ISLAND, WA98040
�i
N
oz n
Oz
m
PH. (206) 236-9989
�g
p
y
FX. (206) 236-0328
j
q -+
rn
r-
rn
p
J
O
x
cn
0
O
m
m
m o
MORRIS AVENUE
D
O
TOWNHOMES
J;
�z
o
m
z
I
z
EVAN CHAN
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
PH. (206) 236-9989
FX. (206) 236-0328
sv
7�
m
Y
m
x
o
EVAN CHAN
€
J> m
m
m
MORRIS AVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
•.
=
oTOWNHOMES
z
iP
v0
m
PH. (206) 236-9989
a
za:
p
z
FX. (206) 236-0328
11:
•r
;u
:O
9
A _
O
z
rn
r
rn
O --
z
m
I x l 1
mIco
i
EVAN CHAN
`i
mIa
mo
m
0
m o
MORRIS AVENUE
7432 S.E. 27th STREET
j>
I
o i
TOWNHOMES
MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
r
Z p
Ln
m
PH. (206) 236-9989
+
FX. (206) 236-0328
o �o�
June 24, 2005
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Renton City Council
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mayor Keolker-Wheeler and City Council Members,
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 2 12005
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
I am writing to you on behalf of the Renton Domestic Violence Task Force. As a
member and Co -Chair I would like to voice some concern about the lack of security in
the Renton Municipal Court.
First and foremost, we are concerned for the protection and safety for the survivors of
domestic violence. As was reported to us from the community advocates that work with
survivors, the Renton Municipal Court does not feel safe for the survivors and there is
no security on the P floor or in the courtroom when they come to testify against the
perpetrators. In hearing some of these stories, the committee that reviewed this issue
feels that security is important not only for the survivors but also the advocates,
prosecuting attorneys, court staff, probation officer and community members. This
population of perpetrators has already shown a propensity toward violent acts.
It has been brought to the attention of the DV Task Force that situations have happened
in the courtroom and outside the courtroom where survivors have been approached by
the perpetrators and threatened not to go into the courtroom, or they have been
approached by family members not to proceed and where perpetrators have been so
upset that they have made comments to the survivors, prosecutor, court staff, probation
officer or advocates. This can be very frightening and intimidating.
In researching seventeen other municipality courts there were only three that did not
have any form of security and Renton was one of them. (See Enclosed Statistics) I know
that we are "Ahead of the Curve" in many areas in Renton but on the issue of security in
the courtroom we are a bit behind. In just listening to the news these past few months,
there has been an incident nationally and in Seattle that has made the headlines. I
believe,we are just as vulnerable as anywhere else in America.
I know that at the root of the issue is how does the city fund the additional personnel. I
do not have the answer but in reflecting believe that funding personnel would probably
be cheaper than the liability exposure when we have with no security.
The Court in Redmond had 177,835 Patrons in 2003. They found one fire arm, and
secured property of: knives (3272), scissors (271), tools (1113) and other items (702)
equaling a total 5358 different potentially harmful items. This is just the statistics from
one Municipal Court. One gun, one knife, or one tool of any method that can create
harm is too much.
We ask that you please consider ways to prioritizing funding and security in the Renton
Municipal Court. So justice can be served without fear of retribution inside the
courtroom. Members of the DV Task Force and myself will be willing to talk further
with any or all of you on this issue and to show some the statistics of what has been
confiscated in courtrooms in our area.
I will be sending a copy of this letter to Judge Jurado and Chief of Police- Garry
Anderson to let them know our concerns. Thank you for your time and consideration of
this issue.
Sincere
�Theei. Kenneth Colman
Co -Chair Renton Domestic Violence Task Force
United Christian Church
1707 Edmonds Ave. SE
Renton, WA 98058
425-226-3080 Work, 206-856-8547
cc. Chief Garry Anderson and Judge Terry L. Jurado
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
August 1, 2005
U1,1 d
C`17 COUNCIL
Gate
City of Renton's Transportation Systems Division (on behalf of Bales Limited Partnership)
Street Vacation (VAC-04-006), Compensation
(Referred July 18, 2005)
The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in e tpff
recommendation to accept the appraisal and waive compensation fol ,,Otre&t Vacation VAC-
04-006 for the 8 feet by 150 feet portion of NE 4th Street, east of Rosario Ave. NE.
Dan Clawson, Chair
Lf",t
j ,�L
Denis W. Law, Vice Chair
WOW -A- t /)0" Z/, , -
arcie Palmer, Member
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utilities System Director
Karen McFarland, Technical Services Engineering Specialist
,
CI TV U��U N C I L
COMMUNITY SERVICES Date f-1',2dOS
COMMITTEE REPORT
August 1, 2005
2006-2008 King County Joint City Interlocal Agreement on the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Program
(Referred July 18, 2005)
The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation
that Renton enter into the Joint Interlocal Agreement to receive CDBG funds through the King
County Consortium for 2006-2008.
The Committee further recommends adoption of the Resolution authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk to enter into the Joint Interlocal Agreement Regarding the Community
Development Block Grant Program.
Toni Nelson, Chair
Marcie Palmer, Vice Chair
L'" �C
Dan Clawson, Member
C: Dennis Culp
Karen Bergsvik
Dianne Utecht
FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT 1 Z UCIL
July 22, 2005 ®ate F-/- ;Z 005-
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS
The Finance Committee approves for payment on July 22, 2005, claim vouchers 239307-239740 and
1 wire transfer, totaling $1,882,430.27 , and 620 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 58507-58875,
and 1 wire transfer, totaling $2,067,280.59 .
Don Persson, Chair
oni Nelson, Vice- hair
a
Denis Law, Member
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
August 1, 2005
Y
C i rV CGS iN C i L
Date 8-14005
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan
Update
June 13,
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to adopt the annual update to the Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) 2006-2011, and the Arterial Street Plan. The proposed TIP includes four
new projects: Rainier Avenue (S 4"' Place to S 2nd), Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multi-
modal, the May Creek Bridge Replacement, and School Zone Sign Upgrades. Six
completed or cancelled projects were dropped from the program.
The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented
for reading and adoption.
Marci r, it
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
Randy Corman, Member
cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Sharon Griffin, Transportation Program Development Coordinator
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. J74.2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
'DATING THE CITY'S SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION
u.IPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2006-2011.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton has heretofore adopted a "Six -Year Transportation
Improvement Program" pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, and the plan and program having been
amended and modified from time to time as authorized by law, and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department, held a public hearing on July 11, 2005, after notice to the public as provided
by law for the purpose of considering adoption, modification, and amendments of the plan and
program; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing held on July 11, 2005, due consideration was given to
the proposed changes and amendments for the purpose of updating the plan and program;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and
the City's "Arterial Street Plan" are hereby further amended and modified, all as more particularly
shown on the attached Exhibits "A," "B" and "C" incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
SECTION H. The plan and program, as evidenced by said Exhibits, shall be and
constitute the City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial
Street Plan," and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified
as provided by law.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION III. The Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public
Works and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution, together with
the Exhibits, with the Director of Highways for the State of Washington and as otherwise
provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12005.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES. 1114:6/9/05:ma
N
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005.
MeW Ps- olulirh
(�a arda Ztom 9. a-)
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. J74k5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY
REGARDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the federal government will make available to King County, CDBG funds
for expenditure during the 2006-2008 funding year; and
WHEREAS, the County and the City of Renton believe that it is mutually desirable and
beneficial to form a consortium to implement the terms of an interlocal agreement establishing the
terms and conditions for expenditure of the CDBG funds; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement would establish the planning for the distribution and
administration of CDBG, HOME Investment Partnership and other federal funds received on
behalf of the consortium from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into a
joint interlocal agreement regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program for the
2006-2008 funding years, and thereafter as the Agreement may be extended.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
1
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES. 1119:6/27/05:ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2
1:54readi,13
i-coos
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. S/,�_l
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 4-1-220, PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR
MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING IN RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREAS, OF
CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON- BY MODIFYING THE DESIGNATED
RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREAS AND OTHER PROJECT
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
WHEREAS, in 1995, the Washington State Legislature adopted Chapter 84.14 RCW, to
encourage increased residential opportunities in cities required to plan under the Growth
Management Act, by providing for special property tax valuations for eligible multi -family
housing in targeted urban areas; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 84.14 RCW, as amended, further authorized cities with a
population of at least thirty thousand (30,000) to adopt procedures to implement the special
property tax valuations; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2003, the Renton City Council held a public hearing to
receive public comments regarding proposed designated "residential targeted areas" in the
Center Downtown, Urban Center North and Center Village Comprehensive Plan designations for
the purpose of allowing a limited property tax exemption for qualifying multi -family housing,
pursuant to RCW 84.14.040(2); and
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2003, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No.
5061 (codified in RMC 4-1-220) to establish a property tax exemption incentive to encourage
multi -family housing development in designated residential targeted areas; and
1
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, the City desires to modify the Urban Center North District 1 designated
"residential targeted area" to help stimulate new construction of multi -family housing in the
adjacent Commercial Office Residential 3 zone, thereby reducing development pressures on
single-family residential neighborhoods and increasing housing opportunities; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2005, the Renton City Council held a public hearing to receive
public comments regarding the proposed modification to the Urban Center North District 1
designated "residential targeted area" to add the adjacent Commercial Office Residential 3 zone;
and
WHEREAS, the Renton City Council desires to modify the project eligibility
requirements to improve clarity and intent;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L Subsection 4-1-220.D, Project Eligibility, of Chapter 1,
Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to
read as follows:
D. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY:
To qualify for exemption from property taxation under this Section, the project
must satisfy all of the following requirements:
Location: The property must be located in one of the designated
"residential targeted areas" listed below in D. La, D. Lb or D. l .c of this Section. If a part
of any legal lot is within a residential targeted area, then the entire lot shall be deemed to
lie within the residential targeted area.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
a. Highlands: Within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan
designation and in one of the following: the Center Village (CV) zone, the Residential
Multi -Family (RM-F) zone, or the Residential 10 dwelling units/acre (R-10) zone; or
b. Downtown: In the Center Downtown (CD) zone, Residential
Multi -Family Urban Center (RM-U) zone, or Residential Multi -Family Traditional (RM-
T) zone; or
South Lake Washington: In the Urban Center North District 1
(UC-N1) zone or Commercial Office Residential (COR 3) zone.
2. Size and Structure:
a. If the project is located in the Residential Multi -Family Urban
Center (RM-U) zone or Residential Multi -Family Traditional (RM-T) zone or within the
Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation and in either the Residential Multi -
Family (RM-F) zone or the Residential 10 dwelling units/acre (R-10) zone, the project
must (i) consist of a minimum total of ten (10) new dwelling units of multi -family
housing, and (ii) be located within a new residential structure(s) or a new mixed -use
development as allowed by the RMC for the specific zone. At least fifty (50) percent of
the space within the project shall be intended for permanent residential occupancy.
b. If the project is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone, Urban
Center North District 1 (UC-NI) zone, or Commercial Office Residential 3 (COR 3)
zone, or within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation and in the Center
Village (CV) zone, the project must (i) consist of a minimum total of thirty (30) new
dwelling units of multi -family housing and (ii) be located in a new mixed -use
development, unless otherwise waived by the Administrator. If the Administrator waives
ORDINANCE NO.
the mixed -use development requirement, the multi -family housing must be located in a
new residential structure(s). At least fifty (50) percent of the space within the project
shall be intended for permanent residential occupancy.
Special Design Regulations for Projects Located in the Center Village
Comprehensive Plan Designation or the Commercial Office Residential 3 (COR 3) Zone:
a. If the project is located in the Center Village (CV) zone or
Residential Multi -Family (RM-F) zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan
designation or in the Commercial Office Residential 3 (COR 3) zone, the project must
also comply with the design standards and guidelines in RMC 4-3-100 for District `C',
even though the project is not located in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan
designation, unless otherwise waived by the Administrator.
b. If the project is located in the Residential 10 dwelling units/acre
(R-10) zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation, the project must
also comply with the design standards and guidelines in RMC 4-3-100 for District `B',
even though the project is not located in the Residential Multi -Family Traditional (RM-T)
zone, unless otherwise waived by the Administrator. If the project is located in the Center
Village Residential Bonus District described in RMC 4-3-095, the project must also
comply with the provisions therein.
4. Exception for Existing Residential Structure: In the case of an existing
occupied residential structure that is proposed for demolition and redevelopment as new
multi -family housing, the project must provide as a minimum number of dwelling units in
the new multi -family housing project, the greater of.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
a. Replace the existing number of dwelling units and, unless the
existing residential rental structure was vacant for twelve (12) months or more prior to
demolition, provide for a minimum of four (4) additional dwelling units in the new multi-
family housing project; or
b. Provide the number of dwelling units otherwise required in RMC
4-1-220D2
5. Completion Deadline: The project must be completed within three (3)
years from the date of approval of the contract by the City Council as provided in RMC
4-1-220.F.2 or by any extended deadline granted by the Administrator as provided in
RMC 4-1-220.I.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five (5) days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:1194:6/7/05: ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
5