Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA00-054 June 0,2000 - Renton City Council Minutes r Page 221 'Public Works: City& County interlocal agreement establishing the Washington City and County Pipeline Pipeline Safety Consortium Safety Consortium. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 6/26/00 for second and final reading: ( Development Services: An ordinance was read amending Section 140, Building Fees, of Chapter 1, G�") Temporary Signs.for Special Administration and Enforcement, Section 100, Sign Regulations, of Chapter 4, Events Property Development Standards, and Section 190, Definitions S, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code by modifying the exemptions from sign permit requirements, amending the requirements for prohibited,temporary, and political signs and devices, and providing for grand opening and special event signage. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/26/00. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance#4846 An ordinance was read granting unto Metromedia Fiber Network Services,Inc., Franchise: Metromedia Fiber a Delaware corporation, its successors and assigns,the right, privilege, authority Network Services and franchise to install fiber optics cable underground together with appurtenances thereto,upon, over,under, along, across the streets, avenues and alleys of the City of Renton for the purpose of installing infrastructure to operate as a broadband digital communication provider and carrier utilizing switching and fiber optic facilities. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4847 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Legal: Card Room Use CS Districts, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code by banning new Conditions Amendments card rooms from the City of Renton should a court of competent jurisdiction find that the City Zoning Ordinance is unconstitutional or illegal as it relates to card rooms, and allowing the continuation of existing card rooms as nonconforming legal uses. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FOUR AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, SCHLITZER, CLAWSON, AND PARKER;TWO NAY: PERSSON AND NELSON. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler submitted a name to be added to the party-of- Development Services: St. record lists for projects relating to St. Anthony's Church or St. Anthony's School Anthony's Church Projects (Aldo Lucio Zerbato, 205 S. 3`d St., Renton, 98055). Party-of-Record Regional Issues: SeaTac Flight Councilman Clawson announced that he attended the Port Commission meeting Path Changes regarding the proposed SeaTac flight path changes. He reminded Council that a letter had been sent asking the Commission not to recommend adoption of the split-east turn because it would bring more air traffic over the north end of Renton and Newcastle. Mr. Clawson reported that the Port Commission recommended retention of the existing flight patterns. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,ADMINISTRATION DRAFT A LETTER TO THE PORT COMMISSION THANKING THEM FOR THEIR ACTION IN MAINTAINING THE EXISTING FLIGHT PATTERNS.* Councilman Schlitzer asked that the Mayor's previous comments regarding aircraft safety also be added to the letter. *MOTION CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 12, 2000 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Municipal Building CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; TIMOTHY SCHLITZER; KING COUNCILMEMBERS PARKER; DON PERSSON; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER; DAN CLAWSON; TONI NELSON. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; JIM SHEPHERD, Community Services Administrator; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; DENNIS CULP, Facilities Director; KAREN MARSHALL, Human Services Manager, DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, Police Department. PRESS Robert Teodosio,Renton Reporter APPROVAL OF MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 2000 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Karen Marshall, Human Services Manager, introduced Pamela Wilson and Kari Human Services: Human Hollandsworth,the newest members of the Human Services Advisory Committee. Services Advisory Committee Ms. Marshall noted that the committee will soon start interviewing the 41 Member Introduction agencies who applied for 2001 Community Development Block Grant funding and General Fund grants, an important annual undertaking. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Planning: Card Room Use accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Conditions Amendments to consider amendments to card room use conditions. , Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that these amendments respond to the position taken in 1999 by the Washington State Gambling Commission that it, and only it, can regulate the location of card rooms within a jurisdiction allowing such uses. Mr. Erickson said in 1997, Renton restricted new card rooms to the Commercial Arterial (CA), Light Industrial (IL), Medium Industrial (IM), and Heavy Industrial (IH) Zones in areas with the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Existing card rooms outside of the prescribed area were deemed legal nonconforming uses. Because the Gambling Commission has stated that cities may not exercise their zoning authority with respect to gambling establishments, Renton faces the possibility that card rooms could be allowed anywhere in the City, even in residential areas. As a precaution,the proposed amendments to Renton's City Code would make existing card rooms nonconforming uses, and would ban new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning regulations for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Responding to Councilman Parker, City Attorney Lawrence J. Warren said the State Senate declined to take action on this issue this year, although the House of Representatives was willing to look at it. r` •June 12,12000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 209 In response to Councilmember Nelson, Mr.Warren said if one of the current owners of an existing card room sold the establishment, it could continue to operate under the new ownership. Mr.Warren added that he disagrees with the informal opinion issued by the Assistant Attorney General on this subject because the opinion presumes a pre-emption by the State of the cities' rights to zone gambling establishments. However,the law on pre-emption states that the Legislature must have formally pre-empted the area,which it has not done, or they must have so completely occupied the territory that there is no room for any city to legislate. Councilman Parker commented that the implications of this matter are considerable, in that it could deny cities the ability to zone for these types of uses. Public comment was invited. Don Schumsky, 2019 Jones Ave.NE, Renton, 98056, claimed that Renton's refusal to allow him to operate a mini-casino at the location of his restaurant,the All City Diner,was a violation of his civil rights. Adding that he has not been treated fairly,he said he has spent thousands of dollars to obtain a gambling license from the State, only to have the City inform him that his restaurant is not zoned for house-banked card rooms. Mr. Schumsky explained that the State has assumed control of all rules pertaining to gambling statewide to prevent graft on the local level. He did not feel that the Council should have any jurisdiction over his business, and concluded that Renton would benefit from another mini-casino due to increased revenues. Steve Schumsky, 6806 S. 133rd St., Seattle, 98178, opposed banning new mini- casinos in Renton. Saying that these uses bring at least 100 well-paying jobs to each location and contribute millions of dollars' of revenue to city, state and federal coffers,he said Renton should not allow one company to operate a mini- casino while banning other companies of the same industry. Adding that he construed such a position to be a civil rights violation,he said the only ethical position the City could take would be to either allow mini-casinos to all who wish to operate one, or ban them completely. Mayor Tanner replied that mini-casinos are not banned in the City of Renton,but rather are allowed in the Employment Area-Valley area. Councilman Parker recalled the public process which the City undertook to restrict new gambling uses to the Valley area,noting that some cities have banned such uses outright. Councilman Clawson echoed Mr. Parker, saying he was certain that due process was followed in adopting these zoning restrictions. Mr. Clawson likened this situation to when the City created the Automall area to relocate dealerships out of the downtown. He emphasized that Renton will fight to preserve its right to zone and allow various uses where it sees fit. Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler added that the City is considering banning all further gambling uses only because the opinion issued by the Assistant Attorney General has forced it into a position of all or nothing. She agreed with Mr. Clawson that the City carefully considers and applies zoning rules and regulations to all types of businesses, and that gambling should be no different. Responding to Councilmember Nelson, Mayor Tanner replied that the Gambling Commission may never take action on this issue. If,however,Renton was sued - I 'June 12,2000 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 210 and received an adverse ruling by a court, it could immediately invoke this ordinance to protect itself Mr. Schumsky stated he has invested a great deal of money in his current location and cannot afford to relocate it to the Valley area. Councilman Parker inquired what would happen if Mr. Schumsky did, in fact, obtain a license from the State to operate a mini-casino. Mayor Tanner replied that Mr. Schumsky would not be able to secure the necessary permits from the City to conduct this type of operation at the current location of the All City Diner, as this would violate Renton's zoning regulations. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 211 for Planning& Development Committee report on this subject.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2000 and beyond. Items noted included: * The public is invited to join the Mayor and City Council for a special ceremony to dedicate the downtown park,the Piazza, on Thursday, June 15th at 6:30 p.m. * The City is holding a public open house tomorrow, June 13th,to gather input on potential improvements to the I-405/NE 44th St. interchange. * Over 76 tons of recyclable materials and 580 gallons of household hazardous waste were collected on Spring Recycle Day last month. * More than 750 children tried fishing and casting during the annual Kid's Classic Fishing Derby held at Gene Coulon Park on June 3rd. AUDIENCE COMMENT Gary McKee, 6431 Corson Ave. S., Seattle, 98178, spoke regarding the Citizen Comment: McKee— Washington State Department of Transportation's request for a noise variance to SR-167 Noise Variance Appeal conduct repaving of SR-167. Mr. McKee thanked Council for granting this (Committee Report Correction) request,but noted that the Planning&Development Committee report adopted on this subject last week referred to"S. 2nd Street"when it should have referenced"S. 7th Street." MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND ITS RULE AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee regarding the SR-167 Noise Variance Appeal. At the Council meeting on June 5, Transportation: SR-167 Noise 2000,the Planning and Development Committee report on this subject was read Variance Appeal(Committee and adopted by the full Council. Subsequently, it was determined that there was Report!Correction) a typographical error on page 2, item 3, of that report. The typographical error had the noise variance of 14 days covering work extending from Grady Way to S. 2nd Street. The reference to S. 2nd Street should be S. 7th Street. There is no pending appeal that would cover the territory between S. 7th Street and S. 2nd Street, and so the variance as initially requested and granted by the Board of Public Works of up to 65 days shall apply to that road section between S. 2nd Street and S. 7th Street. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. June 12,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 211 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council President Corman noted that item 8.a. on the printed agenda has been removed at staffs request. CRT: 00-009,Winston v Court Case filed by Alison K. Chinn, 157 Yesler Way, Suite 400, Seattle, 98104, Renton representing Kevin R. Winston, alleging an ownership and/or possessory interest in$1,720 in cash seized by the Renton Police Department, and requesting that the court remove the forfeiture claim by the Renton Police Department and assume jurisdiction over this claim. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Finance: Accounting Asst III Finance&Information Services Department requested authorization to fill a Hire at Step E vacant Accounting Assistant III position at Step E of the salary range. Refer to Finance Committee. Planning: Assisted Living Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Facilities (Possible Zoning requested direction from Council regarding creating a new use category in the Code Category) Zoning Code related to Assisted Living Facilities. Refer to Planning& Development Committee. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending increasing Finance Committee staff by 1.5 full-time employees in support of leasing activities at City Hall. The Finance:New Personnel for salary, benefits, and equipment required by the full-time custodian and the half- City Hall 4th Floor Tenant time facilities technician will be covered by the rent paid to the City by Iron Support(Custodial/Maint) Mountain, Inc. for leasing the fourth floor of Renton City Hall. The lease will begin on June 15, 2000 and includes one option to renew. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 182632-183036 and two wire transfers totaling$2,178,425.09, and Payroll Vouchers 25634-25877 and 518 direct deposits totaling $1,000,619.67. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Committee Transportation Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending that Transportation: Trans-Valley Council approve the Trans-Valley Study interlocal agreement with King County. Study Participation, King This agreement outlines Renton's participation in this multi jurisdictional study County, CAG-00- of transportation needs, and commits $13,000 toward the project. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 212 for resolution.) Planning &Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee recommending that Council concur with the recommendation of the City Attorney Aigi Card;Room lUse with regard to a revision in zoning for mini-casinos. The Committee ;Conditions Am,o a a a < c recommended that the City amend Section 4-2-080A, "Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables", of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV, Development Regulations,to add language to both Condition#255 and Condition #272, stating that"Should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal,then the City elects to permit the existing card rooms to continue operation as non-conforming legal uses and otherwise bans card rooms." The Committee also recommended that June 12,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 212 the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 212 for ordinance.) Planning: IL Zone Office Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report OGiO Amendments; CA Zone regarding office amendments in the Light Industrial(IL)Zone, and a Hotel/Motel Uses housekeeping amendment to correct a conflict between use tables for hotel and motel uses in the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. This Zoning Code amendment was referred to the Committee as part of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The zoning text amendment requires a separate public hearing before the City Council pursuant to Renton Municipal Code 4-8-080H, Type X Land Use Permits. The Committee recommended that the Council set a public hearing for June 26, 2000. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending that the Public Works:Wash City& City Council approve Renton entering into an interlocal agreement establishing County'Pipeline Safety the Washington City and County Pipeline Safety Consortium, and adopt a Consortium resolution authorizing this action. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3458 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Trans-Valley interlocal agreement for the Trans-Valley Study. MOVED BY PERSSON, Study Participation, King SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS County, CAG-00- READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the meeting of 6/19/00 for second and final reading: Franchise: Metromedia Fiber An ordinance was read granting unto Metromedia Fiber Network Services, Inc., Network Services a Delaware corporation, its successors and assigns,the right, privilege, authority and franchise to install fiber optics cable underground together with appurtenances thereto,upon, over,under, along, across the streets, avenues and alleys of the City of Renton for the purpose of installing infrastructure to operate as a broadband digital communication provider and carrier utilizing switching and fiber optic facilities. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDNANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/19/00. CARRIED. Legal Card Room Use An ordinance was read amending Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Conditions Amendments Districts, of Title IV(Development Regulations)of City Code by banning new card rooms from the City of Renton should a court of competent jurisdiction find that the City Zoning Ordinance is unconstitutional or illegal as it relates to card rooms, and allowing the continuation of existing card rooms as nonconforming legal uses. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDNANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/19/00. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CANCEL Council: Meeting Cancellations THE REGULARLY-SCHEDULED COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND May 8,2000 Renton City Council Minutes 187 • Added 64 and 96 gallon Garbage Cart Service. • On-call bulky waste collection. • Fee for service: Multifamily yard waste collection. Commercial • Added 20-gallon mini-can and 64 gallon cart service. • Added 1, 1.5 and 2 cubic yard weekly compacted service. • Added noncompacted 10 and 15 cubic yard rolloff service. • Incorporated commercial container rental into base rate(previously billed separately by contractor). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Clawson pointed out that even though the new contract includes additional services that were not available before,there will not be a rate increase this year. Planning&Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee recommending that Council set a public hearing on June 12, 2000 to consider 017l\ L=ga1 `ar om s proposed amendments for card room use conditions. MOVED BY KEOLKER- ondition . c�= s WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. EDNSP: King County Comp Planning &Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Plan Amendment re: May regarding a proposed King County Comprehensive Plan amendment. The Valley Urban Separator Executive Proposed King County Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2000 include a Land Use Map amendment to redesignate an area of Renton's Potential Annexation Area in the vicinity of May Creek from Urban Residential, Low to Greenbelt/Urban separator. The affect of the proposed amendment would be to maintain the existing R-1 zoning on the subject properties until 2012. If implemented, King County will not support annexation of this area to the City without an interlocal agreement to maintain the one unit per acre zoned density. The existing King County R-1 Zone is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan and with the proposed zoning regulation adopted by the City Council in 1997 that would apply Renton's R-1 Zone upon annexation. The Council adopted the R-1 Zone after lengthy consideration of the potential impact of higher density on May Creek and its environs. The Committee recommended that the Council and the Administration draft a joint letter to the King County Council supporting the proposed Map Amendment 2 to the King County Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding appropriating 2000 Mid-Year/Carryforward funds from fund balance, increasing the expenditures in various funds and Budget Adjustments departments, and increasing the 2000 Budget. The Committee recommended adoption of an ordinance that authorizes adjustments to the 2000 Budget including some unexpended dollars to be carried forward from 1999 and other mid-year budget adjustments. •. � . CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Greggr Jesse Tanner,Mayor Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • May 31, 2000 • Washington State . Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations (Revised) This notice is being sent to advise you of a change in the appeal period for the following project: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-054,ECF The applicant,the City of Renton, has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of.Renton modifying Land Use Conditions#255 and#272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City if courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land use designation shown on the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan,is found to be unconstitutional or illegal. Location: City Wide. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 16th, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. if you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6581. For the Environmental Review ommit e, Donald Erickson Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation I Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers • agpnryltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue,Kent, Washington 98032 • a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL A-- newspaper ofpublication and is now and has been for more than six DETERMINATIONNA generalENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW-COMMITTEE • months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the RENTON,WASHINGTON 1 English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, : The Environmental Review Committee NO- Washington. The South CountyJournal has been approved as a legal Significanceha ican a Determinationooingr of e PP 9 for the following project under newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. County. CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South LUA-00-054,ECF County Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to Environmental Review for Code amend- to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a nb nn-cconoff make existing card room legal noorming uses and bankinggnew card rooms in the City.Appeals of the envi- LUA-00-054, ECF ronmental determination must be filed•jn writing on or before 5:00 PM June 16th, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writirjg as published on: 6/2/00 together with the required$75.00 applica- tion fee with: Hearing Examiner, City'of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, $37.38, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional informa- Legal Number 7768 tion regarding the appeal process may be obtained-from the Renton City Clerk's ,Office,(425)-430-6510. Published in the South County Journal -June 2,2000.7768,.. Legs Clerk, South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this /`. tk day of4--e-- , 2000 ifv.,4)..„,e,rc__ NO ' ' r7 `iVti� v t°TARy Fes.:`"S. Notary Public of the State of Washington —.— = residing in Renton z i o '°UBoG King County, Washington V • Vfe*c 21 to',•,° , 'i'OF�WAs�` •%`� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-054,ECF Environmental Review for Code amendments to make existing card rooms legal non- conforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 16th, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: June 2, 2000 Account No. 51067 dnspub .. �_ CITY _3F RENTON ..iL '' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 24, 2000 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on May 23, 2000: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-054,ECF The applicant, the City of Renton, has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of Renton modifying Land Use Conditions#255 and#272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City if courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land use designation shown on the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan, is found to be unconstitutional or illegal. Location: City Wide. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 12th, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6581. For the Environmental Review Committee, Imo`' Donald Erickson Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers ag' cyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-054,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSP Division PROJECT NAME: Card Room Code Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, the City of Renton, has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of Renton modifying Land Use Conditions #255 and #272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City if courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land use designation shown on the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan, is found to be unconstitutional or illegal. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: City Wide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 12th, 2000 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: May 23, 2000 SIGNATURES: 5 i/_7-2/ ct Gr gg i erman d inistr to DAM. Departm n of PI •ning/Building/Public Works e",“ VI 3/06 ifn Shepherd, Ad ini�tfator DA Community Services Department A (6 3 �d ee Wheeler, Fire C ief / ATE Renton Fire Department dnssign • NoincE, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION(REVISED) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-054,ECF The applicant,the City of Renton,has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of Renton modifying Land Use Conditions#255 and#272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City If courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's _ zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land �I use designation shown on the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan,is found to be unconstitutional or illegal.Location:City Wide. • I THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 16°,2000. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-0.11a.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430.6510. • • ill • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. I_ CERTIFICATION I, a4'6 At/4 o-a[. , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in. 3 conspicuous places on or nearby •the described property on . 5 3i-o a • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and r theState of Washington residing in , on the ) , day o e-c, �n �►�/',r 1 MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYN KAMCHEFF ! STATE OF WASHINGTON 4.v APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29,2003 ,� .. .� l) • • • tt , rtlnCE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•00-054,ECF The applicant,the City of Renton,has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of Renton muddying Lend Use Conditions#255 end#272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming • uses and banning new card rooms in the City if courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's • zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land use designation shown on the Lend Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan,is found to be unconstitutional or Illegal.Location:City Wide. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM Juno 12°,2000. Appeals must be flied in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.6.118.Additional Information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430.6510. • • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 30-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. • CERTIFICATION I, /&A, €.e. �p ac l c•cJ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in .3 conspicuous places on or nearby "the described property on . Ofte,q "Z S., Zc oo Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the tate of Washington residing , on the 79e.) . Y TCHEFF LIC PUB ATE eF WASHINGTON • COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN I<AMCHEFF T ._, Jl1NE ,2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-294)3 °' �• e NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CARD ROOM CODE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-054,ECF Environmental Review for Code amendments to make existing card rooms legal non- conforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 12th, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: May 29, 2000 Account No. 51067 dnspub STAFF City of Renton REPORT Economic Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning Department ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: May 23, 2000 Project Name: Proposed Card Room Use Conditions Amendments Project Number: LUA-00-54 Project Manager: Don Erickson Project Description: The applicant, the City of Renton, has requested an Environmental Review for Ordinances of the City of Renton modifying Land Use Conditions#255 and#272 making existing card rooms legal nonconforming uses and banning new card rooms in the City if courts with competent jurisdiction finds that Renton's zoning scheme for card rooms which relegates this use to portions of the Employment Area—Valley land use designation shown on the Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan, is found to be unconstitutional or illegal. Project Location: Has city-wide applicablility. Exist. Bldg.Area gsf.• Not applicable Site Area: Not applicable B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. None-Not applicable to this non-project legislative action Advisory Notes to Applicant: Not applicable to this non-project action ercreport.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department Ei;, imental Review Committee Staff Report PROPOSED CARD ROOM USE COND ___NS AMENDMENTS - L UA-00-054,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY23,2000 Page2 of 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.. . Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Air Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Water Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File.: Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. : Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 12th,2000 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercreport.doc City of rctnion Department of P nning/Building/Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPME PPLICAT REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rollce COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren, City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE:. Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 LOCATION: City-Wide SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsored by the City of.Renton, amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet CeS 01a . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where'additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Repf ntative Date Routing Rev.10/93 - l � City of fkenion Department of Planning/Building/Public'works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PaVks COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren, City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 LOCATION: City-Wide SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsored by the City of Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (er.P1-/Oa'r-"& 417 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS a,,,4-__ o >6 i�41 , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher dditional information is n ed to properly assess this proposal. 574..S Signature of Director or Au orized Represen ative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of 1 `:.an Department of Planning/Building/Publiv.. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATI k t ET' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Ric, FITu-OAA+1p—V COMMENTS DUE: MA , oa�6AY 10 zonn APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MA 10,2 CITY OF RENT APPLICANT: Larry Warren,City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: D ricksorPn- n _.. . PROJECT,TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 LOCATION: City-Wide SITE AREA: N/A, I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsored by the City of.Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of'the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water ' Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /V # B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 'vii C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • ",l� We have re awed this applicat' n ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area whey additional inform i s needed to properly assess this proposal. a4/14,047 • 61///ea Sign tur of Director or Authorized presentative Date Routing\ Rev.10/93 City of Department of Planning/Building/Public, vv�rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p��� Rev�GW -kii-a-rs-kr COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren,City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 , � LOCATION: City-Wide lagivt., ®®® SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsorea by the City of Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any;court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element ofthe Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health' Public Services Energy/ 1 Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS OD comni-etai . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. tiao_ Vi I 4,) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Re.>>; Department of Planning/Building/Public b..s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: aU2ibPo2kJv - 'U COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren, City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 LOCATION: City-Wide SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsored by the City of Renton, amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental'Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 1vv alAi)1/(A4 • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS O Aj We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh= e additional infor bon is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. — \ Si•-= ure if Dire for or s uthonzed Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Re:.«.. Department of Planning/Building/Public t/v'ur,S ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2. Sro a�"lu-V.\ COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren, City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 Opt., LOCATION: City-Wide � � •� SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A ce� I 200 6. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Distncielo{IT'tle IV sponsored by the City of Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses dridtWippRig new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutionlegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zon€Y A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS N.)0 cot/UIw -ea 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1() rj Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S -zue_J (-A kL L1.tr— COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren,City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson OIT),op 111 OAP PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 �P" flak.... • LOCATION: City-Wide MAY 10 2000 SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A d UNi...0 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV splll�y the City of Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any.court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS O COVMt,W-c`t( , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. V(0/ C_) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of(,. -!on Department of Planning/Building/Publi.; .,...rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:C j ns- 1 rh Ice_g COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-054,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 10,2000 APPLICANT: Larry Warren, City Attorney PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Card Room Code Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78679 LOCATION: City-Wide SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts of Title IV sponsored by the City of Renton,amending Conditions#255 and#272 to make existing card rooms non-conforming uses and banning new card rooms should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. Condition#255 applies to card rooms in the IL, IH and CA Zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revie ,:d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where d%itional information is needes properly assess this proposal. 67,166 Sig : ure of Directo Autho ze epresentativy Date Routing Rev.10/93 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE DATE: May 4,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-054,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Use Conditions Amendments for Card Rooms PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant,the City of Renton,has requested an Environmental Review for Code amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2,Land Use Districts,of Title IV of Ordinance#4260,Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton modifying Land Use Conditions#255 and#272 making existing card rooms legal non- conforming uses or banning new card rooms in the City if Courts with jurisdiction find that Renton's zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide applicability OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: May 4,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 5,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: Not Applicable Requested Studies: None • Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for June 12,2000,before the Renton City Council in the Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 7:30 PM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hail located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Applies to card rooms in the CA,IL,IM,and III Zones,as well as existing non- conforming card rooms in other zones. Zoning: See above. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Primarily Employment Area—Valley,but could include other designations Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: City of Renton Environmental Checklist dated May 4,2000. Development Regulations j Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,Washington State Environmental Policy Act Proposed Mitigation Measures: None proposed for this legislative non-project action. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,EDNSP Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on May 19, 2000.This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on June 12,2000,a17:30 PM,Council Chambers, Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are Interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,(425)430-6581,to ensure that the public hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Council.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional Information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430.6581 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CERTIFICATION I, 114 dYc De u wJ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on .YYI 5j ,o o Signed:( .,,,,fhee.ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pub , n and for the State of Washington residing in 1c1�� ,on the 19/2t day oft ? 4e,9 2. :TIAAIT:OYFm:SH1NGTON ��t4CHEFF OARPUBLIC C® fi ivliSSION EXPIRES �lt18°�:° 1.. 2003 MARILYN KAMCHEFF ems- MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-2943 • 111) CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • MASTER APPLICATION PR "�PERTY OW ER(S . O - N. PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) Note::If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized': Master;application to'each owner::!: :::' ; `.. EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: Not applicable. Applies city-wide. Applies to card rooms in the IL, IM, and IH Zones as well as existing non-conforming card rooms elsewhere. ADDRESS: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): City: ZIP: Nonproject action,no new land uses proposed TELEPHONE NUMBER: " ' " "" EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: APPLICANT:(if:otherthan`owner) Primarily EAV,but could include others NAME: Larry Warren, City Attorney COMPANY'(if applicable): City Attorney PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No changes are proposed. ADDRESS: 1055 SW Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP:98055 EXISTING ZONING: Primarily applies to the IL, IM, and HI Zones TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206)255-8678 PROPOSED ZONING: CONTACT.PERSON/APPLICANT..: No changes are proposed. NAME: Don Erickson, Senior Planner SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): ADDRESS: 1055 SW Grady Way Not applicable. i Applidi 11%'OF RE ONNING CITY: Renton,WA ZIP: 98055 PROJECT VALUE: H1AY 05 2®00 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 430-6581 N/A RECEIVED PROJECT INFOR 1VIA TION- :.,, ; IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Non-project legislative action applies city-wide. No known card rooms PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: are known to exist in the APA. Use Conditions Amendments for Card Rooms IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Applies to card rooms city wide as well as new card rooms Some future card rooms may be located in areas prone to where designated. flooding in the Valley Planning Area, south of I-405. W:\EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN\PLANNING\DE\Card Rooms\MsterApp.doc\d , . ,.•:::--, -':,-':.;:',,,,:.• ,•v':': :. :: :-••,, -,-••':' -•• _-:;:',',:::•. :'-' ,,':f.,-,:,.,c-, --:,-,:, ::::::,!:: 1,, :, , ':' ' .:'...,, ::1', .-:::,' :: : : .,:-:-:A11/ LEGAL-DESCRIPTI :OF PROPERTY (Attach'gepar e,sheet if needed) "•:.,' t'. ::- s.-. Not applicable. TYPE OF APPLICATION '4'.?,i FEES . --•: •• ':-•, ';, '- -- -Check all application types that applY4 City staff Will determine fees. :, - • .•. . • _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ —LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $_ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _____FINAL PLAT $ — (No.Cu.Yds: ) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY — ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL _ — MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: —SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _REVISION j-AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I,(Print Name) '152 /0 e-pa !En() ei-i ,declare that I am( • • thico•applicatiell, the authorized representative to act for the se a ac ' and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • (Name of Owner/Repr tiv Notary Public in and for the State of Washington • Notary(Print) (Signa o 41*.ffler0Representative) My appointment expires: ,.'-li aiiis:sicrp*TO BEcomil;tirppi•CITY STAFF) :: •,:•1 -• .,,,.:,,_ , • • , , •: , • , , idity:Fild Ni. nbr::1- ot.):(.7C1=1:'', ';: s''ECF :;:: SA '.'lu„ : Sfnii.. cij.,:!,'!`1.1:A:., . :0.::,•:i FP :: ;I'P: ' ,SP ' RYMP ,:V 'AAi::)'':':-W " FPUD -;. :"SM!'i.::SMt .:''::Mi-ii,,,:Bsi,••• A: ; -,cPA, W:\EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN\PLANNING\DE\Card Rooms\MsterApp.doc\d N1110) PROJECT SUMMARY FOR PROPOSED CARD ROOM USE CONDITIONS AMENDMENTS Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV, Development Regulations, of Ordinance No. 4260, entitle "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington". These proposed amendments are sponsored by the City of Renton and would make existing card rooms either nonconforming legal uses and ban new card rooms in the city should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutiona or illegal. These amendments would apply Conditions #255 and #272 in Section 4-2-080. Condition #255 applies to card rooms in the IL and HI zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. PROJECT SUMMARY FOR PROPOSED CARD ROOM.doc\ S CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTION 4-2-080 OF CHAPTER 2, LAND USE DISTRICTS, OF TITLE 4 (DEVELOPMENT REGULAITONS), OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260.ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY BANNING CARD ROOMS FROM THE CITY OF RENTON SHOULD A COURT OF COMPTETENT JURISDICTION FIND THAT THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR ILLEGAL AS IT RELATES TO CARD ROOMS, AND ALLOWING THE CONTINUATION OF EXISTING CARD ROOMS AS NONCONFORMING LEGAL USES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-2-080 Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260, entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,Washington"is hereby amended as follows: Footnote#255 to Card rooms in the IL and IH zones is hereby amended by adding the following language: Permitted when ancillary to a permitted primary use where food and beverages are served on the premises and located in an area with an employment Area—Valley land use designation as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and located south of I-405. Should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal, then the City elects to permit the existing card rooms to continue operation as nonconforming legal uses and otherwise bans card rooms. Footnote #272 to Card rooms in the IM zone is hereby amended by adding the following language: Permitted when ancillary to a permitted primary use where food and beverages are served on the premises and located south of SW 16th St.within an area with an Employment Area-Valley land use ORDINANCE NO. designation as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is_unconstitutional_or illegal, then the City elects to permit the existing card rooms to continue operation as nonconforming legal uses and otherwise bans card rooms. SECTION II. This ordinance will be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after publication. PASSED BY TE CITY COUNCIL this_ day of ,2000. Marilyn J.Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2000. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Approved as to legal form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.842:5/02/2000: Amends 4-2-080 C'aveat.docDoeumeu4\ • PROJECT SUMMARY FOR PROPOSED CARD ROOM USE CONDITIONS AMENDMENTS Proposed amendments to Section 4-2-080 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV, Development Regulations, of Ordinance No. 4260, entitle "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington". These proposed amendments are sponsored by the City of Renton and would make existing card rooms either nonconforming legal uses and ban new card rooms in the city should any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. These amendments would apply Conditions #255 and #272 in Section 4-2-080. Condition #255 applies to card rooms in the IL and IH zones and Condition#272 applies to card rooms in the IM Zone. PROJECT SUMMARY FOR PROPOSED CARD ROOM.doc\ O City Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project,""applicant,"and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City of Renton ordinance amending Use Tables in Chapter 4-2-080, Conditions, of Title IV, amending Conditions#255 and#272 (applying to card rooms in the Valley Employment Area) making existing card rooms nonconforming legal uses or banned uses if any court finds the City's zoning scheme for card rooms unconstitutional or illegal. Amendments to Section 4-2-80111.gitions Associated with Zoning Use Tel Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Orce No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 2 2. Name of applicant: Rebecca Lind, Principal Planner, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Address: do Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson,AICP (425)430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: May 3`d, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of ordinance is anticipated June, 2000 pending SEPA compliance. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at the current time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. FEIS and SEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. • Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No direct knowledge of pending governmental approvals of affected properties. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Council approval is required for this non-project legislative action. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The subject proposal is to amend Section 4-2-080 Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables of Chapter 2, of Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260, entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" Amendments to Section 4-2-8( ditions Associated with Zoning Use TarChapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Or Mite No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 3 by adding provisions to make existing card rooms nonconforming legal uses or banned uses if any court of competent jurisdiction find that the City zoning scheme for card rooms is unconstitutional or illegal. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Proposed code amendments will apply to existing card rooms within the City of Renton,Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. Amendments to Section 4-2-8111ffiditions Associated with Zoning Use Taff Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Orce No. 4260. May 3'd, 2000 Page 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Amendments to Section 4-2-801itions Associated with Zoning Use Tilt Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Or e No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 5 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-project legislative action that will not result in any development that would not otherwise occur and is covered by SEPA. Amendments to Section 4-2-80itions Associated with Zoning Use T Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Or e No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 6 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: NA deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other NA evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other NA shrubs NA grass NA pasture NA crop or grain NA wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other NA water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other NA other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Not applicable Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Not applicable Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Not applicable b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. \1` No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative \, proposal. Amendments to Section 4-2-80112kitions Associated with Zoning Use Tiill Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Ore No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 7 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None will be used since this is a non-project legislative action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. This is a non-project action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. This is a non-project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. This is a non-project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable since this is a non-protect action 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable since this is a non-project action 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. Amendments to Section 4-2-80itions Associated with Zoning Use TIN Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Ordfflire No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 8 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Not applicable since this is a non-project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable since this is a non-project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Not applicable. Proposed amendment will affect the R-1 Zone. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not applicable. The zoning text amendment would apply to any R-1 zoned property with a Residential Rural land use designation. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. Probable initial application is to Gene Coulon Park which is an environmentally sensitive site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Amendments to Section 4-2-80dit Associated with Zoning Use TWi Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of OrdMillre No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 9 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The subject non-project action endeavors to ensure that uses permitted by the proposed minor code amendment are compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. In fact, the proposal arose from the need to accommodate existing accessory buildings in a regional city park. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. This proposed amendment does not have a housing component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. Amendments to Section 4-2-8041111111 itions Associated with Zoning Use TOO Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Ordm e No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 10 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This non-project legislative action has citywide implications and would allow restaurants and accessory buildings as accessory uses in regional parks such as Gene Coulon Park,which currently has such facilities. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. Amendments to Section 4-2-80 itions Associated with Zoning Use Taw Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Ordin a No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 11 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action that will not have any transportation impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. This is a legislative non-project action that will not have any public service impacts. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. Amendments to Section 4-2-80 itions Associated with Zoning Use TIN Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Ord' No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 12 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this klist should there be any willful misrepresentation or i ack of full disclo r on y part. Proponent: Name Printed: PO/0"P /C• g id Date: AY¢l .0 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This is a legislative non-project action. If existing card rooms are made legal nonconforming uses in the future their ability to expand would be prohibited reducing the emission or discharge of such substances includng noise. If card rooms are banned at a future date as a consequence of these amendments there would be a net reduction of such emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases.are: . Not applicable for this non-proiect legislative action. Please see previous comment. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? As a legislative non-project action the current proposal will not directly affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. Amendments could result in reduced impacts if card rooms are banned or made legal nonconforming uses in the future. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. Amendments to Section 4-2-80411iiitions Associated with Zoning Use Tel Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of OrdMOPE No. 4260. May 3rd, 2000 Page 13 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The non-project legislative action will have no impact on energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The subject non-project proposal does not directly impact or use environmentally sensitive areas. Amendments could in fact reduce impacts if provisions are exercised in the future. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This proposed non-project legislative action would potentially ban or make existing card rooms now permitted in the City legal nonconforming uses that could not expand, or ban such uses altogether, if the courts found that Renton's zoning scheme for regulating such uses was found illegal or unconstitional in the future. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action that will not directly have any transportation or public service impacts. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not Applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. Amendments to Section 4-2-80itions Associated with Zoning Use TIN Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title 4, of Or . _ .,e No. 4260. May 3`d, 2000 Page 14 SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this ckli t should there.be any willful misrepresentation or ' of full disclosure on y part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: /V IAy 4/ (. e