HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File� - -�..�. �-- -- ____--.
� �
i
� � - � �� ���sTare o� �
4 �i
� � � w
4 Y
W�' O
Oy
dy�isee�
State of Washington
� ANNEXATION CERTIFICATE
! Office of Financial Management,Forecasting Division,450 Insurance Building,PO Box 43113,Olympia,WA 98504-3 1 1 3
i
IMPORTANT: The following documents must be attached with this certificate(RCW 35.13.260 and 35A.14.700):
1. Three copies of the final ordinance containing the legal description of the annexed area;
2. Three copies of a map clearty showing annexed area and existing city limits on an 8%z"xl l"or an 8'/�"x14"size paper. Outline
the annexation boundaries in red;outline former city limits in green. Maps should conform to acceptable engineering standards,
including directional arrow,scale,street designations,rivers,and other relevant physical characteristics;and, �
3. The original,handwritten Special Population Census Sheets used to enumerate the population and housing of the annexed area
and all census summary sheets. Census procedures and definitions must follow the Office of Financial ManagemenYs(OFM)
Enumerator's Manual. Duplicate copies of the census are not needed. Please contact OFM for census manuals and forms at
(360)902-0597 or(360)902-0599 or www.ofm.wa.gov. •
City/Town County
Name of the Annexation(jany)
Original Ordinance F Amending Ordinance Number(if applicab[e)
Number
Date Passed Date Passed
Date Published Date Published
Ordinance Effective Date Ordinance Effective Date
Annexation Effective Date ' Annexation Effective Date
Statute(s)AuthorizingAnnexation: RCW , � . � � '
Was a boundary or Annexation Review Hearing Yes ; No If yes,date of hearing
Required?
Annexarion Area(in acres) Population and Housing Census:
Housing Linits
Occupied Housing Units
Population
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certffy that,to effect the above annexation,all legal requirements have been satiafie�and that
the data set forth in this certificate,including the attached documents,are true and correct,.
�CITY SEAL] (Mayor) Dttte`^
e� .
_ t t� .. , . , _. " r� _
�i .
Attest:(City/TownClerk) �1+.,.�-,, ,, � �i,f, �/k'_...` Date �-���,�Yl��'fi�.f,+" ' .
�
_ � :.; �, � Date Received �= � �
� ������DateApprcrved : �
SEcrfe�Certifying�fficiat � � � ���OFM Fite Number
(White) Office of Financial Management Carbon Needed-3 Copies
, (Canary) Department of Transportation Original Signaiure Each Copy
(Pink) Retum to City/Town
�
�
a } � �
CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (TESS ANNEXATION; FILE NO.A-10-001).
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a written annexation
petition was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about April 11, 2011; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of the petition for annexation to the City of
Renton, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the petitioning parties, comprised of property owners of
not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general
taxation of the area to be annexed, notified the City Council of their intent to commence the
direct petition for annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing, it was determined that the petitioning owners agreed
to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including '
the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on or about, April 20, 2011, and determined that the
signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the
area to be annexed, as required by RCW 35A.14.120; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development the City of
Renton considered and recommended that the City of Renton annex the properties; and
1
f,�
� � r 'a
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.130, the City Council set lune 20, 2011, in the
City Council Chambers, Renton City Hall, as the time and place for a public hearing on the
petition with notice provided as required by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the notices, the public hearing was held at the time and place
,
specified, and the City Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and
determined that all legal requirements and procedures applicable to the RCW 35A.14.120
petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of
Intention" approved as of September 2, 2011; and
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.150, RCW 34A.14.330, and RCW 34A.14.340,
the City of Renton pre-zoned the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre, as part of the East
Renton Plateau Prezone Ordinance No. 5254, and that zoning will become effective upon
annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true
and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
2
� � �� �
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of
Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty (30)
days after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute
a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and
thereafter in force and effect;the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth I:
herein.
[The property, approximately 16-acres, is bordered by the existing City limits to
the west, with Southeast 132"d Street and parcel lines at the north, parcel lines
at the east, and Southeast 134th and parcel lines at the south.]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILthis lOth dayof October , 2011.
�i�ru.ci � Cc.�r:�'�
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVEDBYTHEMAYORthis lOth dayof October , 2011.
�Gv�''.
;
Denis Law, Mayor
3
� � � y
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
Approved as to form:
" C
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 10/14/2011 (summary)
ORD:1731:9/27/11:scr
.ep'"��ic.u�.�^ 'k,:, f.
_ ., y�J• '� , '
� `x.
; t�• t' `1 �':J � �
y' ` ,"� �! .
, �� � •
: q : i %
� �
�t' � 1
!�'• �. ' � '
".Yi'''pr7f R�� ,<k `'1 #'
.t'.
4
> -
' �� ``r'" ORDINANCE N0.5631 '"�
TESS ANNEXATION
Legal Description
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 and the Northwest quarter of �
Section 13 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,
described as follows:
Beginning at a paint on the eastern boundary of the City Limits of Renton as annexed by
City of Renton Ordinance No. 5398, as filed under Recording No. 200903o4.00i15�, records
of said County, said point also being the westernmost northwest corner of Lot B of King
County Boundary Line Adjustment � L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
2000012590Q002, records of said County;
Thence easterly, northerly and easterly along the north line of said Lot B to the
northeast corner thereof,said corner also being the intersection of the westerly right of
way margin of 162"d Ave SE and the southerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence northerly along said westerly right of way margin, crossing SE 132"d St, to the
intersection with the northerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence easterly along said northerly margin, crossing SE 162°d Ave and SE 164th Ave, to
the intersection with the easterly margin of said SE 164th Ave in said Section 13;
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the interseetion with north line of the
Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter;
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 200 fieet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter; ,
Thence southerly along said parallel line to the intersection with the north line of the �
south 163 feet of the North quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 400 feet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly along said parallel line to the south line of said North quarter;
Thence westerly along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said
Northwest quarter;
Thence westerly crossing said SE 164th Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast corner of
Lot 5, Block 1 of Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts in Volume 15 of Plats, Page 91, records of
said County;
Page 1 of 2 (0332)
�
� ORDINANCE N0. 5631 � ' "'
7hence westerly along the south line of said Lot 5 to the southwest corner thereof, said
southwest corner also being a point on the easterfy margin of said SE 162"d Ave;
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with the easterly
extension of the southerly right of way margin of SE 134th St;
Thence westerly along said easterly extension and continuing westerly, southwesterly
and southerly along said southerly margin to the intersection with the easterly margin
of 160th Ave SE, said easterly margin also being on the eastern boundary of said City
Li m its;
Thence northerly along said easterly margin and said limit line to the point of beginning.
Page 2 of 2 (0332)
��.. z�;,�� � ,�+,,��.,`� , �� �u 4 �y,����..�_ � ;�;�.n Vy , ' II
�� '��.t�'���:�iz'ti'������`�, � �, „�ti ,� ln( H`�---- \ r
��..�� '�;� 6.}5 �� 1 I''7�nr}'''!F .{ p}s` LI-�'::;� �^"`� yt��ri ^,---.]�m3:,rr�a,...��^.
}Y�F !S. �^F f'S { 11 _ __.__ ����.-+�. f
�' '4,.:urs .T�d",��.. ;�}'i'iw�a�SE��.I'.�;��Jl'��1�..',,',`� � ) �
� `�Nt t e, ;ro'tii�.�;�.^ ..t� 5^"�, f'.'; � � �L �U F$y ._._.
'-„A5 .�Z;, ,�p.. �%c�(fJ r Y
�W�W;; p1Y J i.��1w"_."_ �s13�' ,'�^ii,ct C •
�liJ� � v�r ;`J;•, �/'' , ���SUB�y�SG.y� . �s
,„ f".1:'s.::` ..:Ft:z'ti�''?3�t'��.'�+�4+��a-----�--�--�.—_____—
�_fJ�� :�s"`._._�____ � Q;a; ,,,r" r �"� ------__.._.._.r_
h, .��_ r_iYat. ,..Rd.. ~� _ -� �,�r ; ;;�'�
;�� ,,°.�N �,:i:.. " F,�, -i,6,�.� � � -.�?'�._...�______.__
� �: �,'='aC �:i`" ..._� -i•.�:
—c,o'�'�,a ------ � ��.�...._�.. � •_.� ��Y;<; �+,�� ^ �--_._.._]�_�.,�_._
� � Y���'; 4 x;;�,i Tj �,s,�y�'� I
�--�r� - _ '— � „�p.l4} { . � ! +5�4 ;Y
'.E ..__�7' ... , � �5`�..
fi, -- � .3 ,
�. , :-SE 1
^ � , ,
�` , f ;:,�`�"'�,, '.�;,�,;'� `:�-�,.4t�;�•7 f, ���
`�g ��''�; ..���--,:;�:.r-:�. �',r::, a�;, ���"�;�, � ----P�'vate�
,� ; .,�,,�. i. ,;�..,,...,,w...:��:�t:�,>' � Rd.�_____
; i �.:�.:, ��
, �� ��, ����; � ��.
`3�, r 'yl"y 't.:�.
�C ,i.<;'v i''.'
r�, �F.�'�,: n.;t;'�:S���2r1�d�Pl,� �-rt�nK . ;��,;:, ,;:�
G � ��:, f•{--�� �/ ;¢�
� ' _?5"�: -.1:.N;) SgK43n S, J i �i'{' 3}�. '�i � Y•4'1�f,�
T�i.�;y�.� .�i 7�� ,<����� �,sr�^'r i ��.��r
�i' .� l,rn.� rF..,_...__�_,.�_.._.. ,f:4; i �,j�in.Yi5;
�`�3 '3j j :, -
�S 1 '��, ''� �
:7:��^n`4_................._. ':7 '�i�,•" { ''��;Zi
.,ry:c}';, ��_ ...._. +.1 S' :' 1' .
;' �f.S5F 'r<�;., ',.,b
,�t'3"4 !, ",<A;:. i,
;;1.;�':� � t - �� ..,p�;i, n�F.�ir.
..44.. � ;���; .�._.....�. _..__.._,_.._._..._� �._.__._._ ..�;;:�'sr � ''r;;: O
(��;`'{� � � � f � ��"wA�� �._._ ''3i�.y �.r� �
tii�;:x.?k�.. i , ..�,. - .���_� �" �:- �ivate-R�d--- d
�4�S4t)tw`�i�'*f?'''��<°v,`:I'i:;�;<�7� ?�a�. T'- '�'�';��`;;���;S s!?��:�'i',t:`�},:k�`l" s��'�; H
'• ,�-'��, .b, .:�m:k,'-' �.r,;, ,y:3; Z
:,;Va j?` ��' �v3,v'�; �:c: a
.�. ��,"' �� .'! � =�: .51� +:`;,f 7--�
�.�':`.4�; { i�.�9',�'��, .:j,'. .+�
:r',ti;{' . ';'?,`sy�n '�',� 4", n
::�;s�: +;� L�y
; :; —� '')L:£� ;Y,�;; �: �
:'��:'" ^ u• ,�' .�.� °'` �...�.�.._---.-.._.� Z
�.i's��� �L���_, �� 1-...,—,.-.c�fiZ �;i�i�, � '
� ____{' ��...� i,,.,.�; �±i O
-- i`� _.� ;;���" .;,.,-
—`��<;��._.___ — . ;�Z �" P, I
yt ::;:.:. �',
l`1JJ>' eR�`�' '3"���;�a;.:,,�<•, ' - ,"• •
'`�,,.y . '.'�.<< - .__.__ �,g
�.ry _ ,;_r:�,�,,.: -_._._.�_...._._�_�___ ,,i
.i�i:: � �'•' ..� -......._._..__._. _.� ln
':��`:--------. .. ;;'•i��. � I'. :�;. ri,�, � ... __.,._.f �,...,� +� ��;.:�� ---- --- ---- O�
.�i�. [�.!'S y I _�,I s�.�i,,, I
. . � ':=-i"; ff ;"r,.,:J�j �
�` �- E_1�.4.t_ �:ci1-:—�__ i:iw;':__.__.. � ��";-
,~-..� _PJ_ ;cn� i � ���°;: .�:�; --
�oo.,, ---- _.._ __ - ---. cn;.:: - - _--,�k�7,•';,,ti � ,
uy,';: ::a5" �" ay.:;; �,,y;:�,:- �.3
�.,L :��:; _� ---
1� Q;�;;' ��`.
_ _ ,�__ SE 131st St � � _
W ; ,�.. .. Q SE 1 st ___e___--___�__
�n Private Rd � ' ; �
�
� N
Q CO n.,.a..,�,_...z,� �
.�_.M �;,,-,-
< � � ,
_ � ; � � � ,� .,__.
� � _ _� _.F � � ��� �._..
� __
� ° ' �_.-- -
� _�_._�___� .�1.. ����� � � _
. SE_13 �
, ��
�_ -- Private Rd -
SE 132nd PI =
' ,� ; _.
_�. �; .
� � �
_r_-1'--4 P--r-
�
r
i ivate Rd
i
� � � � - � � _._ _
�
�.__..3
w --
cn ` _
� _ �
° _�__ ___
a� -- __.____� � /
Q
w ._.; � ; W
� ;u.. ._SE_134t1i_P_1_ � . �___�_. cn � �,---. �
� > � � � ` ' � � � � T� ��
Q > ,_ � i _ .
�..e_,. m i
� �
�, � •
c.00 D
SE 135th St
� _ cn
rn
File Nam�_:ACI�D�Planninq\G(S`,C;IS_projects\annexallons\ Feb�Ua�-�/7, 2��� �
tess_an nexlmxd sV 1_tess_an n^x_vici ni ty.mxd
� 310 s�°ee� �' � /�e�� .:������� Tess An n exati o n
� u'� l .� ..,,R,,..
13,200 ° � ' ti �
N Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development
Akx Pietsch,AdminidrntM
�tirians A.Jehnson,Plmming Tech 11 �,„„
�ry� QAnnexation Boundary
. _'"''�:S:y:'���.C..,���.� '�� .,,. -� � I_.�City Limits
� :�-
' Parcels
` SP�CIAI� PO�JLATION CENSUS SH�T Pa9e "°. �
ENTER INFORMATlON FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Callback: ��
�,,. As required, return to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Contro! Map with boundaries and block numbers as
spec�ed in the Administrators Manual; (2) Or(glna!Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by biock as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual;and,(3)aU tabu/ation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. � -
CitylTown: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: ry,
Year/Ord.: 2�.� ' � Block No.: ` ,
Enumerator: (�� �� Callback Enumerator.
One Ent Onl
� 2 3 4 5 6 7
—— --- --- Housing - -- No.of ----Mo i e
---- —
Unit Units in Home!
Street or Road ouse Address A t. No.' Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
�)', Y�','Y` , ��. � � MH/TR Spec...
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
'Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearing on the mail box andlor door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g., boats,boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles,etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
� SP�C(AL PO�JLATION CENSUS SH�T Page No. ��
ENTER INFORMATION FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Caliback: [�
�, As required, return to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Control Map with boundaries and block numbers as
specified in the Administrator's Manual; (2) Ortginal Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual; and,(3)all tabulation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual.
City/Town: �Pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: �
`� Block N _
Year/Ord.: - � � °�
Enumerator: �� Caliback Enumerator:
One Ent Oni
2 3 4 5 6 7
1 — — —
— Housing No. of Mo i e
Unit Units in Homel
Street or Road House Address A t. No.* Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
{ 1�� (s Z MH/TR Spea'"
� � �'�� u —E
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
'Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
`*Special Nousing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g.,boats,boxcars,tents,recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify rype of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL. _
� SP�CtAL PO�JLATION CENSUS SH�T Page No. �
ENTER lNFORMATION FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Callback: [_]
,�,, As required, return to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Control Map with boundaries and block numbers as
specfied in the Administrators Manual; (2) Or(glna!Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual; and,(3)al/tabulation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. � ;�^^ �
City/Town: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: =_
Year/Ord.: ;;y. X,,� ' ' Block No.: �
Enumerator: -� Callback Enumerator:
One Ent Oni
� 2 3 4 5 6 -- �
— -- Housing No.o� lVlo i e
Unit Units in Home!
Street or Road House Address A t. No.' Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
� ;.u. 1 2,��, .:_j1 -', .`1 i�%, MHffR Spec...
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
`Each housing unit in structures having only one house address,but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearin.g on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quaRers not generally considered a housing unit(e.g., boats,boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
� SP�CIAL� PO`�"ULATION CENSUS SH�T Page No. �
ENTER IIVFORMATlON FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Callback: �
�,,. As required, return to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The ciry Control Map with boundanes and block numbers as
spec�ed in the Administrator's Manual; (2) Orig/nai Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual;and,(3)al/tabulation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. `:' p-� �
City/Town: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: � p
Year/Ord.: - •�,' ;�� � Block No.: �,
Enumerator: , Cailback Enumerator:
One Ent Onl
� 2 3 4 5 6 7
Housing No.of o-6ile
Unit Units in Home/
Street or Road House Address A t. No.' Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
.-� , ' j ` _ � MH/TR Spec.••
, . , ,,� .11, r \ � ' ` , "`a.
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
'Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearin.g on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g.,boats, boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
� SP�GLAL PO�JLATION CENSUS SH'�T Page No. 0
ENTER 1NFORMATION FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Callback: ��
v� As required, return to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Control Map with boundaries and block numbers as
spec�ed in the Administrators Manual; (2) Orlg/na/Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual; and,(3)al/tabu/ation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. a �, q
City/Town: �Pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: � �`�,
Year/Ord.: "����) ; ; Block No.:� �
Enumerator: ,/l Caliback Enumerator:
One Ent Onl
1 2 3 4 5 7
Housing No.of o i e
Unit Units in Home/
Street or Road House Address A t. No.` Se . No.' Structure" Trai S ecial"
� , `J � �-``' . MHlTR Spec.•'
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
"Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearin,g on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g., boats, boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"residenY'criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
. � SP�CIA� P0�ILATION CENSUS SH�T Page No. �
ENTER 1NFORMATION FOR ONE HOUSING UN/T PER SHEET Caliback: 0
°� As required, retum to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Contro/ Map with boundaries and block numbers as
specfied in the Administrators Manual; (2) OHglna/Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerators Manual; and,(3)a/!tabulation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. + w:
City/Town: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.: ���, �,
Year/Ord.: 2.� ;' Block No.:� „�
Enumerator: �>�J' Cailback Enumerator:
One Ent Onl
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Housing No.of Mobile
Unit Units in Home/
Street or Road House Address A t. No.* Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
� _ , � �� �.J� A�J� ] MHlTR Spec.-,
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
`Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g.,boats, boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
� SP�CtAI� PO�JLATION CENSUS SH�T Page No. 0
ENTER INFORMATION FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Callback: �
+�,�,,,. As required, retum to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Contro/ Map with boundaries and block numbers as
specified in the Administrators Manual; (2j Orlg/na/Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual; and,(3)al/tabu/ation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. --�- � F
City/Town: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No �
YeaNOrd.: 2.m � ti Block No.: ,'� '
Enumerator: �'.. rF/'�e_ Caliback Enumerator:
One Ent Oni
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Housing No.of Mobile
Unit Units in Home/
Street or Road House Address A t. No.' Se . No.' Structure' Trailer S ecial"
� � , . ,.�;� ... ' � 1� � ° MHlTR Spec.••
� Y
If Group Quarters, name of facility:
'Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g., boats,boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"criteria. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP ALL DATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
� SP�GIA� PO''`�"IJLATION CENSUS SH`�'�T Page No. 0
ENTER INFORMATlON FOR ONE HOUSING UNIT PER SHEET Caliback: �
�,, As required, retum to the Office of Financial Management: (1) The city Contro/ Map with boundaries and block numbers as
spec�ed in the Administrator's Manual; (2) Orig/na!Census Sheets in order of house enumeration sequence by block as specified
in the Enumerator's Manual;and,(3)al/tabu/ation sheets as specified in the Tabulation Manual. -� .. .
...�
City/Town: �pv� Block Numbering Area/Tract No.�
Year/Ord.: �':*:?� '� Block No.:1 \
Enumerator: � � Callback Enumerator:
One Ent Onl
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
,,- Housing No. of --Mo6ile- —
' , , � Unit Units in Home/
Street or Road Hou�e'�ddre�s A t. No.' Se . No.' Structure* Trailer S ecial"
��(��' ��'.,F � .' � MHlTR Spec.••
If Group Quarters, name of faciliry:
'Each housing unit in structures having only one house address, but more than one unit,should be separately identified by the letter
or number appearing on the mail box and/or door. Each housing unit is to be assigned a different housing unit sequence number.
"Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing u ' (e.g., boats, boxcars,tents, recreational
vehicles, etc.). Only counted when occupied by person meeting"resident"crit a. Specify type of housing:
BY USING THIS FORM, CITY AGREES TO KEEP AL ATA COLLECTED CONFIDENTIAL.
r'
� �r �11�p
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5631
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (TESS ANNEXATION; FILE NO.A-10-001). �
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a written annexation
petition was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about April 11, 2011; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of the petition for annexation to the City of
Renton, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120,the petitioning parties, comprised of property owners of
not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general
taxation of the area to be annexed, notified the City Council of their intent to commence the
direct petition for annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing, it was determined that the petitioning owners agreed
to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including
the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on or about, April 20, 2011, and determined that the
signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the
area to be annexed, as required by RCW 35A.14.120; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development the City of
Renton considered and recommended that the City of Renton annex the properties; and
1
�
� � .
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.130, the City Council set lune 20, 2011, in the
City Council Chambers, Renton City Hall, as the time and place for a public hearing on the
petition with notice provided as required by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the notices, the public hearing was held at the time and place
,
specified, and the City Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and
determined that all legal requirements and procedures applicable to the RCW 35A.14.120
petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of
Intention" approved as of September 2, 2011; and
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.150, RCW 34A.14.330, and RCW 34A.14.340,
the City of Renton pre-zoned the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre, as part ofthe East
Renton Plateau Prezone Ordinance No. 5254, and that zoning will become effective upon
annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true
and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
2
e'
� � !�
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of
Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty (30)
days after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute
a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and
thereafter in farce and effect;the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth �I
herein. ,
[The property, approximately 16-acres, is bordered by the existing City limits to
the west, with Southeast 132"d Street and parcel lines at the north, parcel lines
at the east, and Southeast 134th and parcel lines at the south.]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILthis lOth dayof October , 2011.
�d�rr,cv •d Cc1r!k�
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVEDBYTHEMAYORthis lOth dayof October , 2011.
�� .. `.-�`,�
��� ���VYv
Denis Law, Mayor
3
ti
�` �' '
ORDINANCE N0. 5631
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
DateofPublication: 10/14/2011 (summary)
ORD:1731:9/27/11:scr
" .��... .. ,
,.+.y`e� .a �',,... .' �
�'� ♦ ��j,' �
. S , ' ,' } `�'.J`S ,
j n .
� g `' �.
`�'
;re ����
'',��Pt�,,�' ,:�'�t � ' �.
4
° � � �
� ORDINANCE N0.5631
TESS ANNEXATION
Lega! Description
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 and the Northwest quarter of
Section 13 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the eastern boundary of the City Limits of Renton as annexed by
City of Renton Ordinance No. 5398, as filed under Recording No. 20090304001157, records
of said County, said point also being the westernmost northwest corner of Lot B of King
County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
20d00125900002, records of said County;
Thence easterly, northerly and easterly along the north line of said Lot B to the
northeast corner thereof,said corner also being the intersection of the westerly right of
way margin of 162"d Ave SE and the southerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence northerly along said westerly right of way margin, crossing SE 132"d St, to the
intersection with the northerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence easterly along said northerly margin, crossing SE 162"d Ave and 5E 164th Ave,to
the intersection with the easterly margin of said SE 164th Ave in said Section 13;
Thence southerfy along said easterly margin to the interseetion with north line of the
Southwest quarter of said f�orthwest quarter;
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a (ine 200 feet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly along said parallel line to the intersection with the north line of the
south 163 feet of the North quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 400 feet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly along said parallel line to the south line of said North quarter;
Thence westerly along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said
Northwest quarter;
Thence westerly crossing said SE 164th Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast corner of
Lot 5, Block 1 of Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts in Volume 15 of Pfats, Page 91, records of
said County;
Page 1 of 2 (0332)
� � .
ORDINANCE N0. 5631 �
Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 5 to the southwest corner thereof, said
southwest corner also being a point on the easter[y margin of said SE 162"d Ave;
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with the easterly
extension of the southerly right of way margin of SE 134th St;
Thence westerly along said easterly extension and continuing westerly, southwesterfy
and southerly along said southerly margin to the intersection with the easterly margin
of 160th Ave SE, said easterly margin also being on the eastern boundary of said City
Li m its;
Thence northerly along said easterly margin and said limit line to the point of beginning:
Page 2 of 2 (0332)
µ� , � � ;��,� __ ���,� y� ,.
�� f 4'i"R'`d!� J
k ��IL u, i f ,�;k-�rf`^F� '�r.r` tG � x �, .. _._. _,_.__� � � i�.--•.�.__......,,.-.�,...�..:,�.�rx.
' �� �.��`�,'c�'"�,.1,` '�'�^��-{«�'il��' i"��,�SC�,���St��t��' ,i[l1 ^r�' �i 1
�� 1 CIJ,t� _ ,'��+�� � �� ___�_—_...
� ' — �. �,�.�,
.�� •t#{�1�'.�q4�h'�Y�,tS' `�. �} Mt
� ef "!�'�'__— ..` '�7ta�'.�I<ilas;.�,1.�;t.,�'-.L",'���, _.,..�
------�� - r�vate d � `�`'� -'"w ' ___.—._._._.___
.� � ^ ;° -�F �;;_..�.` -
f�� _ ____ p: � -
,�; i'���JAi'3. '.h}i,�'¢: ;�f F� "'
a� ' ',�r'� � ''' <
______di�. ; c� cD:�_ . ,"— ___.__
^ �..� �;$
,�.....� -�.._ M1 '.•Fy'_'_'--^^. .,_.�. _nF.' . ,��
� e.°�a'! � rn.���f";� � j�` �+�—_.._' -- - '�—`_`-----_
�`r �., �� � '�l"'�r` I
,���, - _.. _ ._ rv���_SE 13 + ,,r.., �,, r r��;�
��Zqk:r(' � ^�.... �--.-.�.-.....`_
_ �-�,.�.__ _ !.( �4� _
� .�f.k �"d"d`�'�'rtb''�'£7'�?y;dY;iTiiu,i �,..�,,y"�J�. 4. �
:�;�-� �� ���,.:����. ����, —Pr= fe�Rd�____-_
..� �r� �, , t ,���t ua
����� !�+s
,:;�� � , � ,a.::,� ,,,'a;
��1'�'`���"��S�T��2nd�Ri=� ��-�::,,.. ��.��. �:
!,:rt'��' A���
�i.4.^� "�., A;Y ('�N_ .7'� 'M•'t4fi'S4'`iFD?i�j:;�.,'�i�3,j � ���i,�� .y,
Sq�t :y. ;'���,��' J___.. t�r
_...._ ����'�i'L' r�,l� _ _—_...--. ��„I6ti ���'✓�,£St
`��",<_��.._ '3�t� '+'�s�,,Ul; �
',�t:i i{ '��`� � ';;�#r
'..�:Y _._. � qi N:G i�Y.�;t ., `�
:5=�'_ .+.t,'43a` �:;�•'"� t' :�'�f,
--- �,r p� � +-' ' t�i ti� I F�t i,'•
� . IY _.1 4'��if �r
t'� ��.� 1 � �� jx�� ........�.-..__�--._..�.._...�__ ._..................... !i'�Yr i �,';�; o
��;�� ����'�r�
�3, '.�a;�.., %v
iF. �r�ra�n._,., .rr .. ,�:.*„ , ty
;v���t., �'�'n:.;r ai'+;"i{7; fr, �"_ Pi:�.n�..�d:�'' t:;�.:��,�� ��?i,��l _.- �ivate-R�
t��� '� d�-- H
„A�`��, =;�;,.:,,,:,�r�,:;;:I:�..'�, s.;:�-, ;,�' z
� �. �I =3:L,.:�; �.:� .
. � + /rt�-e1, a
.... �,�; '�."_..__.i ....�_.-..3 -T�:i� ";r�.. '.��'
,�'� � , i;'+� �
4.'.r"f: I _ _�._�ro�i`xn _'^k, �l,�; �
s5:v;�ti �"' 1 � . ' � �t.,m, ..;°.
Af, �`�� �,k;,,� ;:`� _—__._.,, �
��ryi17 \ L.._...__ .. -._._ .lF���� ��k:, _.--_ ��i, � ���__
\ ��; ',;��;,: z
�_—��""' �� - T�.} ';
�4i�--._._._. � . , ��.S,y��L,Y �:.,� --_..__� ';i: . Q
� -� ����' y:�'u,,._ �a;�� :_ .,y '� �...�._._. ---..�-_ _�_•____...._.,.�_ �`7
.�', -.._-..._.�___�_. •' „ , _._._ �� � ,e;i. "._...._-.-�.__...._ _.�._ -_...� �
�5'�=' ';.i;:7 � � � � � '���';'�,.� I` �`i:��tS` _..__ ., -- �
�Q'� '-"� �:r.i;�r ! r��:'s„
i •W,'. _-- �1`�S ; ���� �
.�� _, --� SE 4.t__.P ` _ � 1 w,;�;----- y �:s�,. . ---
13. �__---'cn`TM _ , ';,�. — �-�
�.$� ; " ' _. ." • :�. -.-_;!C�'1,"'�ti ��; �'
;G�'i: xi§t�'it �+N�
',i:.:�i ;s�'- -,� '�`"'` ,��� •
� y.,:: ._._ I
,,,�+;, %�.__ �' F;— -- ; . ,�;r.��
��'`�+b'S' ���w �''r ��4!"'_._._._._ _,.-..-. _.C�'-t
_._�....... -_._.,._ _ __ � .
�-�'�'`�7� '_ -.._-. .._._:0�4 d ,��� � i"{�'D t9v .
�;
i�� r/ ;,ACr�C�`c���''J'..s;�f���3�;'�s3��?.�1 C{{,, cj �'�;,!s:t:;,',�-,�^ ' . }.a.i�: '
�„'1'C' T '.V��' .'..t.�.�:':'ii,`i!,"r .�.r.,,.^:t•,>:�;;i�--
.l . _ ./L_-....-._..•`z��rX'.�y ?35�'.nFELX�:`bY�, ,1�.��Jll,l�"J�l?��r:=,�i,;��ri':ritiv�:�;.a id 'io's'!:. .�.�4:'0 '{�p:.�i':� 'r:.
k����'"'�� _ ��� �.a.�i. - ',iYM�� 114:F'� "1�" z,.. N�i _ i'W''�"1= ,.�Y���,�I�.FF'i _
'�1.^ �1� �!` �i�..�'v; 'J,rf,:^. . �� V:l:.���..
� -.�,, .-v!� J,T.� �(n,, "�t,:: ,).�r�,.µy,,.., '�:�j"�'fi`i:'i' i U!:'.'�,yei'T1:;.
.��u �_ �7� t._. _ �;�Kr m ?',�::1 �i;. .�ry•.r',r^;.�v�P�i- V.�� a� t�"+r. �
5";r'r� ?�&,��t�t -- —- r'�'�+ ;1.�'�i ��'�''�'# � +�"
1.,P ML
FleName::10ED1PIanninglGlS\GIS_proJecislannexationsl February 7,2���
tess annexNixdsll_tess annex_vicinity.nucd
0 3,o szo ;�r.�.,:�,: � -:� _����� Tess Annexation
Faet '� .?• ! t x:.�;,::r �',-.i
1:3,200 " �''``,';�'�'!�
N �`;<'y� ~�r����,��
Commimity&Economic Developinent � � d � Vi ei n ity M a p
AlexYie[cch,Adminishntnr ��, �fi-�,�
AdrinnnA,Johnson,PlanningTechTT a�,.,,,,,U� ���n
. -� ��of,k , T
`�"` QAnnexation Boundary
�r�;�(��i�G�l �("��, ��:�� a '�,���,��� `� I,�City Llmits
�- K,.., �
ti �`F�.,
i �.�I Parcels
Denis Law �r�,.r --�--
Mayor � Clty Of:-� Cy �
� ,...:�.- ,; -;�_ �
+ - � �
� � " A �� '
i 9 „ �� � � � '.a'�=� ♦
..�� ° ��:i `.r
-iV`1
Department of Community and Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administrator
November 1, 2011
Dear Future Renton Resident:
SUBJECT: TESS ANNEXATION SPECIAL CENSUS
On November 13, 2011, the area you live in is anticipated to become part of the City of Renton.
State of Washington law (RCW 35A.14.700) requires cities to conduct a special census of
recently annexed areas. The purpose of the special census is to ensure proper distribution of
state funds allocated to cities and towns for municipal services, such as police protection.
These funds are allocated on the basis of increased population to the City.
The City of Renton has hired the firm Census Services to conduct a door-to-door census of your
neighborhood, pursuant to State guidelines. Soon after the annexation is effective Census
Services will conduct this special census using census enumerators. Each census enumerator
will carry an official City of Renton identification badge with their name and picture on it. The
census enumerators will ask you for your name and the names of others in your household.
This is because the State of Washington's Office of Financial Management requires persons
living in annexed households to be identified by name before they will certify the census and
allocate state funds to the City. A listing of names provides a means by which state staff can
verify the census and identify any discrepancies, such as a duplication of names. The
information vou provide will be kept strictly confidential. After verification by the Office of
Financial Management, all records are destroyed. Only the final city population count will be
released.
If you prefer not to provide information through contact at the door, there are other ways you
can provide this information. First, when the census enumerators come to your door, they can
leave you a census form and a postage paid envelope for you to return. Second, you can take
the census by phone by contacting Glenn MacGilvra, Census Director at Census Services, at
425.533.5432. Third, you can email your phone number to amathias@rentonwa.�ov and a
Census Services employee will phone you.
For questions about the annexation or the City of Renton, please contact the City's Planning
Division at 425.430.6575. The City website also has information about this special census
available at www.rentonwa.�ov. Thank you in advance for assisting us in this special census.
Sincerely, �
���'�
1���v l
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
`. ��:,��:. � '�r�
. ?:.:
� =�,� ��x Washington State Boundary Review Board
��; .
� For K1ng Col�yity
: �:�°
� �`'�'�:� � �'N 1'esler Buildirzg, Room 240, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 296-h800 • Fax: (206) 296-6803 • littp://u�u�u�.kin count . oz�/nnrtexations
City of�ien��n
September 2, 2011 Planning Division
SEP 0 6 ZU11
City of Renton �����v�D
Attn: Angie Mathias,
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 987057
RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION—File No. 2329—City of Renton—
Tess Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required
Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, far the above-referenced proposed action filed with the
Board effective: Julv 18,2011.
The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period Julv 18 —September 1,
2011, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this
proposed action during the public review period.
The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective:
Seutember 2, 2011. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions,
where applicable:
l. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the
Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board
may then be required to hold a public hearing.
2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of
this letter.
3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this
letter.
4. Fulfillment of all other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of
Intention.
�
�.�r- �
.
�
y
Page two continued, September 2, 2011
Form 13
5. Notification in writing of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should
be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Karen Wolf, Chinook Building,
King County Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget (OPSB), 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite
810, Seattle, Washington 98104, and
6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance
accomplishing this proposed action; and(2) a copy of this letter. This document should be filed
with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025,
Seattle, VVashington 98104
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296-
6800.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
Mike Reed, Council Administration
Dave Wilson,Elections Division
Tom Brown, Department of Assessment
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
King County "911" Program
Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development&Environmental Services
Karen Wolf, Office of Performance, Strategic and Budget(OPSB)
Steve Hirschey, Department of Natural Resources
Connie Wong, Facilities Management Division, Real Estate Section
Anne Lockmiller, Facilities Management Division, Real Estate Section
�,.,r;ITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BI`t�
ai#:
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: �
Dept/Div/Board.. CED/Long Range Planning October 3, 2011
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias x6576 Agenda Status
Consent.............. X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Tess Annexation Correspondence..
Ordinance.............
Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
King County Boundary Review Board Closing Letter Study Sessions......
Map Information.........
Draft Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On June 20, 2011, City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed Tess
Annexation. Following that public hearing, Council accepted the 60% petition and authorized
the Administration to forward a Notice of Intent to the King County Boundary Review Board
(BRB). On September 2, 2011, the BRB issued a Closing Letter for Completed Action indicating
its approval of the annexation. The next step for this proposed annexation is for Council to
adopt the ordinance annexing the area to the City. The area was pre-zoned Residential Four
Dwelling Units per Acre (R-4) as part of Ordinance #5254 and the East Renton Plateau pre-zone.
The R-4 zoning will become effective upon annexation. City departments conducted a review of
the annexation proposals and all departments indicated that the annexations represent logical
extensions of services and raised no concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the ordinance annexing the Tess Annexation area.
� �
=� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For Ki�zg Coi�rTty
�'esler Building, Roora�240, 400 �'esler V�%ai�, Seaftle, l'VA 98104
P)ionc: (206) 296-6800 • Faz: (206) 296-6803 • ]tttp://tozc�u�.ki�7ocoi{nh . oz/anne�atio�ls
City of�ient��n
September 2,2011 Planning Diviston
SEP 0 6 Z011
City of Renton �����v �D
Aitn: Angie Mathias,
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 987057
RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION—File No. 2329—Ciiy of Renton—
Tess Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required
Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action filed with the
Board effective: Julv 18,2011.
The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period Julv 18 —September 1,
2011, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this
proposed action during the public review period.
The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective:
September 2, 2011. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions,
where applicable:
l. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the
Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board
may then be required to hold a public hearing.
2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of
this letter.
3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this
letter.
4. Fulfillment of a11 other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of
Intention.
�r.r `�✓
Page two continued, September 2, 2011
Form 13
5. Notification in writing of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should
be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Karen Wolf, Chinook Building,
King County Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget (OPSB), 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite
810, Seattle, Washington 98104, and
6. Filing with King County Council of (1)one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance
accomplishing this proposed action; and(2} a copy of this letter. This document should be filed
with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King Couniy Courthouse, Room 1025,
Seattle, VVashington 98104
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296-
6800.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
Mike Reed, Council Administration
Dave Wilson,Elections Division
Tom Brown,Department of Assessment
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
King County"911" Program
Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development&Environmental Services
Karen Wolf, Office of Performance, Strategic and Budget(OPSB)
Steve Hirschey,Department of Natural Resources
Connie Wong, Facilities Management Division, Real Estate Section
Anne Lockmiller, Facilities Management Division,Real Estate Section
SE 131st St N
� SE s
a
n Private Rd �
� N
Q �
L �
�
lf')
� SE 13
Private Rd
SE 132nd PI
�
� ivate Rd
r
w
�
a�
Q
� SE 134th PI N "'
� � � � �
>
� � �
�
� � D
�- � SE 135th St
�
m
�,�.,r:. _ �.��,�,� -:��: ;�� ;�s ��.<, ..,.,_ , February 7,2011
- ,-,:,_.. . 1_ > ��,�-. �c��r:.,"�nxd
° 3,° sZF�t ,<;� . Tess Annexation
13,200 � � - ,
N _;.^ � ..``_. � Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development
;, s=
Alex Pietsch,Administrator 'z�^ ,sr---+�
Adrinnn A.Johnson,Planning Tech II ,L� „���
c�ry or �,-;� �j i,,
-�'"` QAnnexation Boundary
--___.-�.��i� �� I f �� �� I �;� _``. s —��'City Limits
� �i' I._.�
_-�-:�'
� __ Parcels _�_ _�
`'�r.+ �'
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (TESS ANNEXATION; FILE NO.A-10-001)
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a petition in writing
requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be
annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about April 11,
2011.
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of
Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120 and upon
public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to
accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the
applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on, or about, April 20, 2011 and determined that the
signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the
area to be annexed, as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development the City of
Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of
Renton; and
1
� �
ORDINANCE N0.
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed June 20, 2011, as the time and place for a public
hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, on the petition and notice
thereof having been given as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and
place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with
the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law
applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of
Intention" approved as of September 2, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton pre-zoned the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre,
as part of the East Renton Plateau Prezone Ordinance No. 5254 and that zoning will become
effective upon annexation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true
and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of
Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty days
2
�v✓ �
ORDINANCE N0.
after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a
part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter
in force and effect; the property being described as follows:
See Exhibits "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein
[Said property, approximately 16-acres, is bordered by the existing City limits to
the west, with Southeast 132"d Street and parcel lines at the north, parcel lines
at the east, and Southeast 134th and parcel lines at the south.]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2011.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2011.
Denis Law, Mayor
3
�r.✓ ,,�r+,
ORDINANCE N0.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
4
„ �,�r,,,
;;r�� '�✓
�`-;'�'
=� �” Washington State Boundary Review Board
For Ki�ig County
1'esler Building, Room 240, 400 Yesler L1/ai/, Seattle, WA 98104
Plione: (206) 296-6800 • Fr�x: (206) 296-6803 • littp://wz��u�.kirigcounh/.gov/annexations
�ity of Ren�on
August 29, 2011 Pianning Divi�ion
City of Renton ����Q��Q
Attn: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
File No. 2329—City of Renton—Tess Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the
above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has
been officially filed effective: July 18, 2011. Therefore, the end of the forty-five day period
allowed for invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is September 1,
2011. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board.
Please be aware that any future final ordinance ar resolution on the proposed action must
incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any
revisions made in response to the engineering staff review.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o atch)
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w/o atch)
FORM 12
STATE OF WASHINGTON, C'OUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Renton Re orter NOTICE IS HEREBY' GIVEN
p that the Renton City Council has
fixed the 20th day of June, 2011,
at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time
for a public hearing to be held in
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of tne seventh floor coUn��i cn�„-
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months be�s of Renton c�ty Han, ioss s.
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, �
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in to consider the following:
the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King bo�ro Pec�c�on co A„neX �a
proposed zoning of approximate-
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as �y �6.3 acres, bordered to tne
a Legal Newspaper by arder of the Superior Court of the State of nottn by sE i3Zna sc.,to cne east
Washin ton for Kin Count . by lbacn a�e. sE, co cne soutn
g g y by SE 134th St., and to the west
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues by i6ocn a�e. sE. �Tess an-
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was perat�on: F��e No. A-10-001;
Proponent:S.Bech)
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. A�� ;nte�estea p�ctes a�e invited
The annexed notice, a: to attend the hearing and present
. . written or oral comments regard-
Public Notice ing the proposal. Renton City
Hall is in compliance with the
American Disabilities Act, and
interpretive services for the hear-
was published on June 10, ZOI 1. ing impaired will be provided
upon prior notice. For informa-
tion,call 425-430-6510.
Bonnie I.Walton
City Clerk
Published in the Renton Reporter �
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is on June 10,201 l.#498384.
the sum of $80.50.
�
y ��� ���G� ,, .
Linda M. Mills -�= =-; �
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter . �;�_ �;- '�
Subsc i ed and sw r�to me this lOth day of June, 2011. �. -
�' .
Kathy Da otary Publ' for e State of Washington, Residing �
in Covington,Washington , '-
P. O. Number:
ti''�' �„r� `�"'
f °:�.
�
= -4 � Washington State Bo�+ndary Review Board
For King Coi��zty
�'esler Building, Rornfi 240, 400 �'esler L1/a1�, Seattle, WA 9810�
Plione: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206) �96-C803 • littp://ze�ze�z��.kirtgcourin�.goz�/ar2rtexations
August 18, 2011 �
City of Renton
Planning Division
City of Renton
Attn: Angie Mathias, AUG 21 1011
Senior Planner
!O55 South Grady Way �/7 �
Renton, WA 98057 ����Q V �L�J
RE: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO REVISED LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
File No. 2329—City of Renton—Tess Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County engineering staff reviewing the revised
legal description submitted with the above-referenced Notice of Intention.
We are assuming that you will be in accord with the recommendations made by County engineering
staff and are continuing to process this file. However, if you should disagree with the requested
corrections, please notify our office immediately. Any questions regarding these recommendations
should be directed to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at(206)296-3731
Please send a copy of the corrected legal description to our office as soon as possible. We need to
have the corrected legal description on file prior to issuing a letter of approval. Also, please be
advised that the corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to this
proposed action.
Si erely,
�
Lenara Blaum
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division, dated August 17, 2011
cc: Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w/o enclosures)
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures)
Nicole Keller, Road Services Division(w/o enclosures)
Kelly Whiting, Road Services Division(w/o enclosures)
FORM 7
�
� ' � � �������D
.
auc ��s zo�t
Wii State Boundary Rsv;e�n,
Road Services Division 9oard For King Co.
Department of Transportation
KSC-TR-0231
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
August 17, 2011
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0240
RE: Citv of Renton—Tess Annexation (BRB File 2329)
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the revised legal description for the proposed Tess
Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your August 17, 2011 letter.
Staff reviewed the enclosed revised legal description and recommends the following
revisions to the Tess legal description, as per the attached red-lined copy:
Page l, Paragraph 2, Lines 4-5:
Where it reads:
"County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
20000125900005, records of said County;"
It should read:
"County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
20000125900002, records of said County;"
Please see my previous letter, dated August 3, 2011 for a detailed listing of King County
Road Services Division's research and findings.
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Nicole.Keller@kingcounty.gov.
Sincerely,
.�.; ��-
ydia Re olds-J es
Project Support Services Manager
Engineering Services Section
LRJ:NK:mr
Enclosures
,�..�.,�,�
r
'�" '1�► , ,
Lenora Blauman J
August 17, 2011
Page 2
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., Interim Division Director and County Road Engineer,
Road Services Division (RSD),Department of Transportation (DOT)
Karen Wolf, Division Manager, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Gwen Clemens, Senior Policy Analyst, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Karen Freeman, Senior Policy Analyst, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Daisy Tamayo, GIS Specialist, Department of Assessments
Paul McCombs, GIS Specialist, Department of Development and Environmental
Services
Richard A. Brater, P.E., Manager, Engineering Services Section, RSD, DOT
Mary Coltrane, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator, RSD, DOT
Rey Sugui, Program Analyst, Road Services Administration, RSD,DOT
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, RSD, DOT
�
• • � �`� ��tacR�vta�
S �d��s
� ��1 � � QU� �� �
!
TESS ANNEXATION yVA 8t�te 8oundery Rsvie�nr
Lega! Description BoardFo�Ktn�Co�
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 and the Northwest quarter of
Section 13 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the eastern boundary of the City Llmits of Rentan as annexed by
City of Renton Ordinance No.5398, as filed under Recording No. 20090304001157, records
of said County, said point also being the westernmost northwest corner of Lot B of King
County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
200001259000 ,, records of said County;
z
� Thence easter(.y, northerly and easterly along the north line of said Lot B to the
northeast corner thereof, said corner also being the intersection of the westerly right of �
way margin of 162"d Ave SE and the southerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence northerly along said westerly right of way margin, crossing SE 132"d St, to th�
intersection with the northerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
Thence easterly along said northerly margin, crossing SE 162"d Ave and SE 164�' Ave, to
the intersection with the easterly margin of saicf SE 164�'Ave in said Section 13;
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with north line of the .
Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter;
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 200 feet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly along said parallel line to the intersection with the north line of the
south 163 feet of the North quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter
Thence easterly along said north line to the intersectian with a line 400 feet east of and
parallel with the inrest line of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly along said parallel Iine to the south line of said North quarter;
Thence westerly along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said �
Northwest quarter;
Thence westerly crossing said SE 164�'Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast corner of
Lot 5, Block 1 of Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts in Valume 15 of Plats, Page 91, records of
said County;
Page 1 of 2 (0332)
M
� � ♦ 1
, Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 5 to the southwest corner thereof, said
southwest corner also being a point on the easterly margin of said SE 162"d Ave;
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with the easterly
extension bf the southerly right of way margin of SE 134�'St;
Thence westerly along said easterly extension and continuing westerly, southwesterly
and southerly along said southerly margin to the intersection with the easterly margin
• of 160th Ave SE, said easterly margin aiso being on the eastern boundary of said City
Limits; �
7hence northerly along said easterly margin and said fimit line to the point of beginning.
�
Page 2 of 2 {0332)
�;�coo i a� - ��o 000a, � �
� KING��COUNTY, WASHINGTON VOI./PAGE
c � CRONES & ASSOC.
. BO�JNDARY LINE —Iv— 135 y5
��s�� At�J U STM�N�T 7JBos,8 A���ND SUR�EYORS aJZ 59j '
�—� :�{VO. L3-9L3003
.REC Lz�RATI O N..... ,i
;,.,}SNpW-P1L`MEN QY�7HESE PRESENTS TFAT WE THE� .� �I
UNDERSIGNED OY/NER(5) QF THE LAND'HEREIN:D�SCflfB�D� ���
DO HEREBY MAI(E A BOL'NDARY LINE�P.DJUSTAIEIJT,-;' �
THEREOF PUR�UP.NT TO�RCW 58.73:040 ANR'DECF:4RE ,
THIS PDJUSTMENY��7A.:BE THE GR%IPHIC RERRESENYA7ION .
OF THE SAME, AND 11iAT SAI�:ADJUSTMENT IS MADE �
WITH THE FREE CONSENT ANO{IN ACCQRDANC��WfTH
7HE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S)�.�IN.W�TNESS WHEREOF l7� - ..
HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. �
//��''�� - , ORIGI�IAL LEG�1E DESCRIPTIONS: � T2EVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
�� LOT;iL TAX PAFCE[�NO. 145]50-Op6] CROSS REFERGNCE:
LOT A�
ilfqT' ION Oi'LOi 3,9[OCK� RE/ERENCF 5�OE 10 iHE lnLLON7NC SUR4EV5
�ary ����p0�[�+ '� PoWo R.M<Can �� 1.OF CEOAR��PARX .�THAT PoRTI�A"F1F.THE NOFTH HALF OF LOT.S'9LOL'It. FOR SEC1qN SU80MSqN AND RE/NFORNATqN.� �
�rip /y;;Q� 5 ACRE'iBAG1$A$RECORDf6��N IqLUMf 1�'OF '�2.CEPdR PARK S�+aCRE�RAC15,0.S R£q7FCE0 IN ���
F✓: � PfA�S,P4GE 91,RECORDS OY KMC COUN�Y, WASN- .��.
inO.AR� �^_ �,�� /� _ _\ lNG/ON,DESCRIBCD AS FO lOWS• ' . WLUN£15 O�P(qiS:PIGE 9t,p[$�R/B[D A$fOLlOwS RfCORO OF SURLEY gpOK 92,PACE]0
� �� k BEC/NNNJG AT THE NOR[HWEST CORNEF dl�Sa(D LOT 5; RFCORD OF SURVEY gppK 105,PACE J
; ; iX]/Y14 f i 1-�'f�((� 7HC fAS/J5/FCEf OF TW£$OVIH HA(Y,A$MEr1S--� 1H[yfC$g¢'Iq'06�f ALlM'C 7NE NORW LINf OT�,SAIp LOi 5 AECORD OF SUFJEY BOOK 76,�ACf S06
UR£D ALONG tHE f0.Sf L?%E.J,HEAEOF,;� F[T,• N�2"y'0�•p9'3J'i CEOAR PAItK 5 ACRF IRALiS.WLUNf]5.PACE 91
= 'v,�G>Uyt\4 +,`.�- �.�� M�(`n..... .... A•DlSrauCE'�0�129.<4 Y TNE
_`' �••�M� ..- ��� .;16J.B2 FEF/:Tp THE SOLiH CMf:7JF THE AtJRTN FIAI,F RECOROS OF K/NG Cp(/NTY,WASHfNG7pN
'���'�J`A.E i A„`/`�� } L LOT B:7AX GARCfL IvV.la3l50.pp65 �� �: OF SA/D LOT 5:''TN[MCE N8B'Il.'35"}v.ALONG+SAID
. rr�sr.� �7'�C�11'1 Clv�n
••,,to..... �� .:.. ' sounr cwr•msnudtr w rZ�.a�rzn Tt+iNc wcsr
����+li������pP� exo•a�a,,kr,e,� THE SOUTH!N(�Of LOT 5,B4�'K?,CEMR�Pa'RK�.-<`� UNE OF$ND LO�5:TH[N�'F.'NOl'JJ'Jo 1'V ALOnC Tti�,.�-••`=.
5 ACFC T21C15.AS RCCORDfO!N YttLWE 15 0� � �'D,1YE51 LWE f6d.02 F{[Y TO THE PdM O£B�QMNING.
S(ale of Washinglon /C.�' ��"-�;. PU�S,AACE 9f,RECOROS O�KM1C COUMY,WASN- "'� ' '.. � '. ,''
Counly of�]J+fl—�A� /NCTON,LESS THE E/Si J51 FFf7 AS MEASURED �'LOT d '':.. �' .:' '�,::;,
�cerlify thaF 1 know or M1we salisfaclory eJtlen t6k �ol �'�'.:, N.ONG TNC£dS1 LINf THEREOF .•' '� �- '��:::;i�
LOT 5.BkOCK 2,CEDAR ARK S�ACRE�RACiS,AS
' '���2!'U�.rn�Ql2d`/. R[[ORDYD IN lqGU1�E 15 OF PLlTS.PACE.91:'kEfDRDS.....
signe�and ocknowledged it t6�be(his/�er)fr,ee onG LOT C:iAX PARCEL N0. f45750-ppE6 ��tlf KIA�",�p(/My,�LESS THE frLST 130 FEE�OF TNE � ���
SOU7H NALF Cy`yVD LOT 5,��AL50 L S�FIAT PoQIlON �
.ow �N M e aes ana n�.00s�s menuo�ea�o m�ut.i.w.���a ES s_....--'-',: .
��a A�"+ � .:' THE NORTN HALF OF LOT 5,BLOCX 2,CEDAF PARK OF TH[fpRlti;tW.F OF f11p�pT$�DESCF/BED A . BAJS'IS�.OF HEARINGS:
�,P"��55�oNF�2J9 .; :. ':: 5 ACRF 1RAC15,AS RECORDED/N WLUNE 15 0! �OLLONS: �'.,. .� .. ; .
��.3' .�2 - .. � PlATS,PAfiE 91,RfCOROS OF KfNG CpU///Y, BECMN/NC Ai�FIE NOk'INWfST CORNER OF SAIp_LOT 5;,..��� .
�NOTARY�N s�9�e��:e or n '1
��� l //�� WASNINGTON. THENCE S88'40'46 E ALOfIG 1H£M�RTH LINE OF�SAfD'LOT 5
y.F Nobry AUCIic -�/���H- A DISI.WCf OF 129.<�FEE�'TNfNCE,-500'�9�JJZ' ?�1E�8A515 OF g[ARINGS IDR TH5 MAP/5 THf
PUBLIC Daled': 765.87 FEf7 70 TYIf SOUfN UNE 0�i[IE A0R7N H4F.,, :'�T L/NE OF THE SOUrHEASf OUAR7CR OF IHF
Nf p2 M � ,:�NORTHEASl OUART[R OF SECTION 11,ts SllO1VN
9� S'B-ZOO� V'� Y:ffPVointment expres -� ��O/ _.. OF SAIp LOT 5:iFIENC£NB9'6)']6'Wp(ONG".SAIP•..-.:� . (Npi'JJ:NW 1�55UNE0
SOUTH UNE A 05lANCE OF 12].J4{'((T 70 TNE W£5l� �
Of'WASNH :' :": ::' UNf OF SaD LOt 5:IHEACC NOt'JJ'3�W.1GONC 1HE'�::.. :
� ' ��� SAfO WE51(fNE i6<,0?FEfT Tp THE PO�M OF BfC/NN/AR:,�'.;,:'
�.:'�Slole of Weshinglpn �.� �'". -
'��.-Co�nty oi ' � _.' �',; LOT G
I ceAily lhat I kn w�or:Y�ave saliafactory ev'Cen t�+at " �.'��....� :' '�:. '.: ..
G'C2�1,�,�.)')')C(�an/1"�:{��il AR T4 YYI�(_'CfhK .;.' ' �HE FASi pJ0 FfE'r OF�HE Sd/TH HN.f 0�101 5,BLOCK
.�NOTE:JME�EXlS'IINC SEPT/C TANK AND pHA/NFIELD 3.CEDAR PARK 5 ACRE IRACTS.t5 RECORDED IN NJLUME nEL�ME0.5UREAIENTS LOR iHIS SUR�.EY PER�ORAIED
signetl '°' menl and acknawkdged+i{:�o,Ce(his/nu•��ree an0 ; � LOCAiqM��N fXSTMG'iAX OARCE(,.00BB'S+:., 15,PAGf 9f,R[CORDS OF KIfJC COUI�fiY. WITH A y'TOPCON CTS}B INSTRUMEIat,8Y TRA�RSE
vol �(jTf P es ond purpexs menflerted'in'the inal�umenL�' �DENT/FIEO ON ASHV(G�ORAWINL'P?ONDEO BY METHODS,AND MEET OR EXCEED aCCURPLI'STPN�PRDS
�Q�`SsIOHEkyLs V9 CAS1f�..hYE 06�RK'�.NFAL�H.L'�MER. O�1:10.000.
"o°NOTA<RY N9� s�y�ae�.�o�({,, � �p� -
R
PUBt�C Notary Publicd L/!GC{il� /�. `,i`^'n'.�
2
9�, 5-&2001 v��. ',yt Pp�nlment espires ..•.•. ..
°F was���
APPROVAL •.. �
DEPAR7MENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENv1RONMEN7AL SERVICES
APP OVED Tlil$��� DAY OF SMtUQR`I__,fi9 200�.
] ...
��-�-�-��-�-- � . �
Seni � Engineer, PIa{tin Uriif, Land �Jse Services Division -
KING COUNN DEPARTMEM OF ASSESSMEMS ,r.�. ..
Examined and approved this 2�oy of Syy,�,dEjC_, 19__ � �
::.. :: ..: ;: :
�I ... :' .. .. .�:� .;::' �`:�
�EtII__1i�J•_ti_____ .1�.�v1_��*1— ..�.:: .:�' .. �� :� ::- .�.�.'.:..:
King Caunty Assessor �eputy Kinq County Assessor
RECORDING N0. "
ZOOOOI ZS 900002 APPROYAI NOTES: � '�"�:.'� '.: ...-.'.-.. ' � •.•.•
:..
P'OR"fIOk�DF '
LAND SUP.VEYOR'S CERTIFICATE �S �.� THIS REOUEST OUALIFIES FOR EXE�IPTION �" : : ,;'`.V,j��
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE .................... � o UNDER KCC 19.08.112. I7 DOES NO'f•... ; .'� :: . � .''
r�e �`
�T+ ''er�'N GUARANTEE THAT THE LOTS WILL BE `'� •'` . �� - " �
200o This BOUNDARY LME ADJUSTMENT correctly represents � > "s�'l�4 0` �1 4,5;_�`t r.23�R.SE,.�'iV.M."`° <
filed for record this.zSTH.doy of,JAN„�}g,,,.,,,atj,pqpti{ o survey made by me or under my direction in + SUfTABLE FOR DEVELOPMEM NOW OR IN ----� ---�
135 �'u'�� 45+ re t of conformonce wilh state and county statutes � ��a THE FUTURE. THE LEGAL TRANSFER OF .:� .:�� ,�r_ .
'��, ��� a G THE PROPER7Y MUST BE DONE BY ����:._, .:' :;'� .!C:;.��'��
in book.........of........at page. .�!at the ques ;��
�� 9��.., i9.9.9. ^�...•' SEPARATE INSTRUMENT, '�
JAMES D.CRONES �HALLA�� DWN. BY DATE�'� JOB'NO. .. __:'��� :�:' �
............ ...
�.,,../��/ BDH/PJE 2/1998 �MCCAP-�.tA.FLX :�. �
4•':-..�.................................. E�w�s smro� .: . ;:�
.B.O.�...BRI?SE............... 1o7P1.:...W/.ASU1N�TON......... CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET " '�::_, �
29537 Op 2 �i. �',.
Mgr. Supt. of Records Ceriifcate No. ................ 1y//]/99 MLS 60 1 :,-
�} �"""" r (�� y�^..
:��.k.(,J��J����� s �"fi.. J �� �`t '�1 ;,)`•��i^�_
KING:`COUNTY, WASHINGTON VOL./PAGE
�� BOU'NDARY LINE CN_ CRONES & ASSOC. �3� ;.f�;u�—��-
(�'a'.:4s�\ Ap;JUSTM£NT �A I.�1"ZD SURVEYORS
l�_i� :.i�10. L�9L3003 ?3906 1901M1 Av�.S.E Kmf,Wo 980t2(4p5)/J2-59J0
�f/161H CORNLR N£CORI�IER f1-7J-5
FWMp CONC.SURfACE
_ ' — � --- . __ _, NORTH LINE NE 1/1 SECT/ON lt SB9'�600'E(P) NpN(9RAS5 06K W/�
_ - � "� _ 598'11Y0`E(C) PVNCX)JANUARY 199H � fz
..- ... 126Bb1'(C) . _' _—' . — . —_ . �l�, . __
1?]i.6p'(P) �
t�3
LEG�NI): '
..,,� .:'� .:' :' JO' 30' - ..._ �
FOf/ND 5£C/qN CO?NEA'MON/5 SHC3�/N� .�-�
C09 ]/4 CORNER-AIONA5 ShY1WN � ' ��y:"�I"�_. .. .
. . I "�"` ... �
� � � ' � ��`. ` _ ` I
{ FO(/NO MON!/NEM 45 SNOk'M=� ��^ ,l'�' � '-�:
..m [
.::�- '�Ol�P.Rf$AR k.
• SLT 5/8 HEBAA g GP LS A T95Jt':���� I�'..,�Ir� _ ___ �CAP LS]`1961P ` I T 7
■ SEf 2X7 UNE S/0.KE I � �c�ly�` -.,�:"��,:`, :.�� 1�
' _y I . :- .>::..�:�'� � �
O FOU.Na REBAR AND CAP(1H6 SUR✓EYI "�, `� pQ59� �p.0'6� Op64"_.�._ i� �p63 i OQgO �
� FIRE MDRAM Q��O �
��� � �.:_:,::-��::. ,
•O- POWER POL£ �� � � FIN/ND REBCIf X . I __. . I - � -" I J� �
p � i � ::-� .1��� cav+,S:i 196�2 . .;��� ' I I �
m 7fLEPMONE V.tUlT 11� (j -0' ..' ' ' �
S C r i ' I I N9B'44'ab'W I �./!'(PI:`'i �.�':. .,"--
S
� WpT[R ME�ER Yv W/E��NCf : SBJJ6'(N) '�:_,
EGy��69� 588'II"l6' o \ �i9.</'(M) 450.J1'(IQ N99�J�4G�M'(C) ` � I 1
❑ CA]['H BASIN �t � ` ..•' �: ::
pQ wn�FR vnL E � V�1 30.Od' I ' ... x fFLOFF ' _^ x � I 1
� � �.—�.-_�..-,_ I
Q SfT PK f�14/L W/WASHfR � ASP�'T 0 � .�` �:
(M) MEASURED '.;.I ` i U .. � � O�E ..BAF/?. t.l .: __ 1�.h7htE CORNfF 10.�:�.: ,
.:' ��'�.:. L . .�I ti.�q5-(OF PROF�ORNER I
(C) GN.CULATED .:::. .; 4'CHAW OW 4 � `:'��_����� n�:1/.x ::.:S�ia„ -:
FENCE LMf 9.36' G/�'K ,,: �(K 56 I
(P) vLAT .:W£5T Of PFOF GNE' �4.5f' : ��Z. •.•.` .-.•..�.�'...'`�I
T " Ntl00�2/�'[�. I����
��/1 } LOT A f63,8Y'(C)N � ..- r ;'i "' �
—_____-_ _.---!� ���.."..I �i a CnRAC£� . .: . ' I -1
SE 132ND�'PLACE h::^ ��: � ��� Z v ��19�S31Y � 'BARN;.` CUL�FRT '..$,Ei/1 0F LOT',y�. ... �I.: �� I tNii l U
!y 9� }I
_._'.�.__ "--.u___�__ SHH'Ol'J6Y' .s .. SB4.9S'�N '.: �:. ..�I. �.�t
„� .` '2].1 _�__��-�p� ) NBB'41:36'11"...:..........'�_ ���''".
�'��•' _I' ' � \ .J6'�M) I.:� � I
'� .., 1 q �":: b I
—_`_______ '� � '- ••.,.,:., � OLD L/NE V .
, .1HE N,LfNE�Df_ � ` � 1'X���
�m 5. t/2 Oi LOYS. t.4R4GE� � e f%�IN 61 1}
J�� ��.':V o a - - � THE W.L�NE OF E. �Ot� �.�i�;g-
� ;o l o P'_� 7Ax ( \ \ SOf'S9'l0f' 2J0'OF5. 1/2 I�^�"������. �
.�` ..� �,�n 6 5 1 1 1 6 J.8 9 16:� Oi LO�5 t n b 1
..... ' ��.�.' �I� ,_. �Oi.O�"' � Cas HOUSC m I y` I �
' O, " ' :"� HOUSE gqpN �g e �I .
'.�-. �In�� '• ��� �'�y' -�':iLi/..:;� NEW IINE C �' ^ I I
o �y n
••�"ASPNA.�: ' GAZEBO .:` �: � � b L�� �
I"::. LS�+ar+�-" ' I I
, ..�:.. �::� o �P,��,� :.1 �� :: � �` �
CATE...•`� . ::
I .: : ;'-' - �. • ..... . .. _': I
�� N N.'355.B1' .' � � 2JO.J5'(.WJ I
I
SB6.f 6'(M) '.;.598'S0'26 E
� i` e'w000�«ace z.s' SBs.u•(n� . � " �
I I � SOUTN OF PpQp,UNE `�t n�i 1 �
'� ..�f0UN0�i:PfPE.15'W � � FENCf COANER 15.6' �
� ANa.19'A"OF PROP d £AST OF AFOP CORNCR
�'pRNER ' I ,L I
I 30' I JO' � ..... .....���� ....
GRAPHIC SCALE � � � � 0�70 :� . 4� ��`� . •- � �"'.f..� f �
vi,- - `�� G ,�. ''':�, I �
� �� .... AYG: ., �
u U� � '~ .;5 ,r..,._. �M
I ��� y I YA-gl�1�15� - I - � I ` I
°° �z -
� " � VOv y=' E�IY.4 CORNER SCC. 11�
� IZ �� c�A�A'S r� .:'p I�., � CONC::NON IN C�iSE
�`¢YP(�j f y .. vCR!t0$I05-OJ„
( IN FEET) � � ,RJ I C " G� � � .......
1 incL e 60 tt. � � :� � �a��3
, �� '� .. �.:'.I�� ,
� �i ,. -
�w .
� � � ��S D. P6R110N:OF.:, . . :�� :..�..'��'.;-� � '-.:...:,:.:,
�~S� � �"SE•iye`or� NEi%a.s._f4�7.23N..R.SE. W.:M.. ::.�.� �o
� A •� r .. `
� __—__" � ffiSt) � �i._ :' �:%`"�:..+`
� s�
1/16TH CORNfR f0UN0 ��NALLA�� DWN. BY DATE �'� JOB Nt1. -,' �:�
I/pN IN CASE(CONLFfTE � m
W/NAILJ JANVARY t99g � SE 736TH STREET BDH�PJE 2/7998 MC�AP-�A;FLX CJ?{'
� --�' EI�IRES 6m/� CHKD.BY SCALE SHEET �;-':;.,
12/1]/99 MLS 6� 2 OF 2
�� .y�
r° � �r.I
� �1��������C���►�� ���t�� ��������'����,� .�,��i���� �c���°�'
� ���� ����l�� ��`������r��
�' r,'� �%pia�tlia:s;�. ,;s'.`Dak ",�lt #��'' t`�t�`S . b'„i:, .`�:":'it°�. . . , `,�*;�iF.?
tra t l 1����•°Sa'i.� F���{ri , �f�:. ;t<4i�'f • , .J; 4.'�ti; '1t;.��hdi� 1��iP' � �+.'a1�.�.7>�i, �7:$1"a',
."�U�tl�t t fs. �?C)i i _ = I, �,tri1;, a:�f?<�1:
�'it� ��t"Rcntc�n
f�ttn: �1n�ie 1�1c�tliicas,
:4+�nic�r 1'l���ner
!(1;� �;c�uth(iraciy L�4'a}
ite'ntczt�, 4�'.��► �t�U57
F�E:: RI:t�I.'l:�a��� F()R .�U�11i�tSTf��17"1�'1� C't)RRi�C'1.It.)N `I�t) I2[=�l�st:i�i,l:C;.�I.
I?I:4C'�tII'TIt)ti
i�ilc° Nca. ?;?c) . C'itr� c�t�Et�rtic�rj �l��,� !1�tttexeitic�i�
I)�ar��t�;. tt�l�thi��:>;
1;ncl�sec�l �al�asc: �in�! t� cc��� c�f tht lett�r fi�cm� hii�� C'c�urrt�t' C[1f,�,'t21c'�'1'Itl� >Iat3�rct•it���in� the r�<<isi:cl
Ic:�al ct��scri�aticro sulariiittk°cl �ti ith th� �t�,��°e-reftr�n�r:�l ''�at►re�zt�lntc r�tieaaa.
11'�ar�:�.�sun�in� that y�ca�r «�it( h� ir� a�:ccj�•�i ��it1� ti�c.y r��:c�;nmc.�nc3atictt�s n�acf�h� C�'c�unt} c:n�ii���ri���
statl�a�xc� are c��ntinuin� t�� �rr�cc;s thi;; �ite. t tc»�,�etc�r. if�yc�� shti�trlc� di�;��;ree W'il}1 tIl(.� rc�uestec�
Ci)FCt�C�td?tiS, �}IE'tl`iE: I'ttzll�t� t�UP t/��lc't.' t171ttl�t�IKiI�I�'. �tli° C,�lit'altf)11?s tCl;aiCCItIlL l�lt;;� I`ECt117tTi1CllC�rc��i{ti1S
si�c�iiltl he direc:teel tt� hic�7le �:eltc r, Rc�ati �erti iccs I)it i�i�x�,�t t?t)t�►'c)6-;7�1
I'I��� ��nd a %c�p�� c-�f'il�c� rcrrrc.�ct�ct te�a1 c�c:s�:ri�tic3z� tc► e�t�r c,tii�:� �s �ex�n <�s �►c�+s:�i�lc. V1'e nc.�c.�r� tc�
l�a�rc i}�t CC�T't'ct'1�'t� (�'�'.,i#I L��SCtt�'11Cfti1 t1Ci ftlC' pr�+��r t�� issuin� a Ictter czi'�pprc�ti�l. ;'�lst�. �t�asc k►�
i1tIL'i?r'tC� LI7t1I ��ll' l"C�1TCC�G�� Il!-'r1I C��tiLI'1�1�It1t'1 Illll;sl � u�eJ c,n all liiturc �c>cttirients relate�l tc� tljis
�ar���x;►sct� ��ctic���.
�ITICt°t`L�i`,
��"t�o.�
t.cnc>r� Bl�iut���i
�.4L'Cl1Il�'t �iEl'Citilfl
�°.It�::t)titif�: �,�ttf'C�l'tllll �ltl� C't)Uf1�!r' �'Ztic�{� ;�CI'�`It`t'.ti �1�"tilC7t1. C�'c11C'L� �tf�USl ��. ��)� �
r�: l.ydif� R�.���nc�lc�a-.Ic.»��s, �1.i�l;��er. P�c�ject Si��pc�rt Sk.rs�iczs(t4=�'��ncicssures�
�1aa��i: �i<�ris.C"lc:rk ��f'the t+C�11I1C,lI �\1'i't1 c:11{;I{f�I.I1't�}
IVict�lc.� k.eller, Rc�ad '.a'c:r�°icc� f�i�•isi�>n� t�=�c-��.nc:lcfs��rew)
k�ll�• '4h'ltiti���!» Rt��id Sc°rr°ices Ui��isi��n(��'r►cr��Ic��ur���
f=t7K49 ?
,� � �s � '� ,�,, „� h�Ct t'�"'';!r�
,£: a.���,,
4� .
�.,:
" � AU� �8 �11
� ._ � , ,
Road Services Division ���'��0"�'"
8oard Fcu it�Co.
C�e�d�tmen;�f Tra'�.y=c�°Ya.,cr�
KSs;-T�?-t�,231
.?�)t �iqtltFt.�c'Ta:�;5t1z'E �tP'r't?i
Gak,"c4E.�!,.:> �^r'f`i�)��{)�•���✓},:
�11lfrUS[ {7. 2Ol I
L�n«ra f3lautnan
Cxec�ttiv� :��cr�tar},
Boun�arv Review�Bc,ard
YE�-��t-0?�0
ftE; C'ity vf Kentc���-- `1"�ss Ann���ti�ia(BRB File ?3�'.9�
D�ar�'I�. E31�unna��:
"Thank!�°�?u fc�r the og�rtunit}° t+� re�fi��i�thc� rev's:�c� le��l c��s�ri�ti�a�� fcar thc� �ra�sed'I'ess
�►x�n�x�tic�n tc� the Cit�° r�f�tentc�n transr��itted witil yc�ur Au�ust 17, 'C�11 Iciter.
Staffrevicwec�tl�e �ncic�sec! r���ised legal descri�tic�n and re+cornmends t11� #i�ll�tiwris��
rcy�isic�ns t�thz Tess le�al descriptian.,�s pc:r the�ttachc� red-lined c:c�p}°:
Pa�� l. E'�tra�r�ph 2. Lines�-S:
Where it r��ds:
..Cc�unty B�undar}= Line r"��justrnent L4�t..3t�(�3,a;; file�i �►ncler Recordin�I'�ca_
20C1()O l?:�9(7t�OC}5, recc�rds c�t"saicl Cai���ty;.,
il shc�ulc� read:
..�'ount�� 1�oundary Linc AdEustmc��t L�,?�3L3fl03. as fileti t��t<��;r Rec�c�rdin� N�.
�00+�412590�f�42, r�cc�rd�c�f saic� C'c�ur�t��;''
Plc�as� sec. ��r�}= previous l�tt�r, c��.�t�d Au�ust 3, 2p 1 t fc�r a det��il+�� lisiin�raf Kin�;C'c�unty
Rc�ac� S�nti���Uivisic�n's rtsearch and (ind�n�s.
If4°e�u h���•�aay� c�ue�tians, �Ie�se contact Nicc�le Kettcr, Vat�tii�nns and [�t�t�ndaries
L-:n�ineer, at ZtlCi-2'�t5-:3731, c�r via �-mail at Nice�le.Keiter�'it>,kir��c:ouni��.�;o�=.
Sinc�r�ly.
!+`
,�,;, ,r�!?,�,,,.:
�pdia Ke �lc��-J �s
t'roj�ct Supptart �er��ices Man��er
Fn�ine+�rin��ier�=ices Sectic�n
LRJ.NK:mr
Encic�sur�s
, .,�,:.Y
.� [.enori 8lauman �, �
Au�ust 17,201 l
Fa�� 2
cc: Anne I�lari�,Clerk ofthe l�.in�,Caunt}°�c�uncil {wl enclasur�ss)
I'aulette Nvrm�n, P.E., �nterim Divisian Dir+e�ccc�r and C+aunty Rc►ad Engineer,
Road S�rrri�es l�ivisic�n{R�LI}, Departrn�nt ofTmnspartatiar�(DQT)
Karen Wal� Division I+r�an��;er> 5tr�cc��ic Plannin�;and Pc►licy,{.�ffice af
Pcrformance, Str�te�� and Bud��i
�awc�n C"lemeas, Seniar Pc�tic�x �nalyst, Stratc��ic �'lannir�g�rnd Pc�lic}��, Uf�ce of
1'�rform�n��, Sirate�y��nd Bud�ct
K�,ren Freeman,Seniar Pc�licy Ait�.lyst. �tr�te�ic Pla�nin�azad �'c�lic�°, C)f�ice Qf
Perfonnancc, SCrate�y and 13ud�e#
Dais!�Ta��ayc�,GIS S�ecialis#, De�►artme�nt o�Assessments
�'�u! 1�99c:Cc�mbs, G�� Sp�cialist. T?c�arim�nt of'I��vc�l�pmeni �nd Environmental
Scn�iee:�
Riehard �. �3rater, P.�;., M�na�er. �n�ineeri►i� Services Sectit�n, FtS�, I��7'
t�lary C"oitra��c. Cnter$�vernment�l ltelations C`c�crrdinat�rc, RS[�, pC.�MI`
Re}� Su�ui, Prt��ra�n Analysc, Rc�ad :�er��ic�s Administratiar�, RST), L?t�T
fi�ic�lc Keller. En�in�er II. En�in�eritt� Servi�es Sectiai�. R�U. Dt�T
, ��� ��������
� � � � ���
�d �� � � �� �� �
TESS ANNEXATiO
M �
Legat G►escr�ptian �����
That portian of the t�artheast quarter af Sectiart 24 and Lhe Narthwest quarter of
Secti�an 13 of "fownshtp 23 Narth, Range 5 �ast, W.M., in Kir�g Coun�Cy, Washingtan,
described as fo!lnws:
Beginning at a pain�nn#he eas#em boundacjt ofthe C�tyt�}rnits of Rento� as an��ced by
City af Renton t3rdinance No.5398, as�iled und�r Etecording Na. 2oa9o3oaoos.�57, records
of saici County,said point also being�he westernmr�st nt�rthwest corner af Lot B af Kin�
County �aundary Line Adjusimer�t 19�L30U:�, �s filerd under Recording No.
20Qt?t3i259��records of said County.
T�ence ea�ste�.Y, �ortherly and easterty aiorrg the north ltn� af sa�d tc�t B ta the
�ortheast c�rner ther�eo#,said corner aiso be�ng the int�rsection of the westerEy�igfit of
way margin af if2""�Ave SE and the southe�ly ri�ht of way mar�in of SE 132"d Sfi
Thenc�e na�thetly alor�g said vveste�ly righ# of way margin, crr�ssing SE 132"� Si, ta the
i�teesection with#he nortMerly r#ght nf way margin a#SE 232'Nd St;
Thence eas'ierfy alc�ng sard northerly m�r�in, crvtsing SE �.62"� Aue and SE 164'�Ave, to
the intersectian with the easterfy rnargin af said�E 264�'Ave in sald Section 13;
Thence snutheriy along said easterly marg�n ta the intersection with nc►rth line of the
Sauthwes#quarter of 5aid Northwest quarte�;
Thence easterfy along said north tine to the intet�section witt� a line 200 feet east af ar�d
paraiiet with the west lin�of said h�orthwest quarter;
Thence sautf�erly alon� said parailel tine to tfi�e intersection with the narth iine of the
sout�r �.63 feet of the North quart�r of the 5outhwest quarter af said Northwest q+uarter
7hence�asteriy aton�sa3d north li�e to the intersectic�n with a li�e 40�J feet east of and
par�►11ei with the west iine of said Northwest quarter;
Thence southerly ator�g said paraClel iine to the sauth tin�c►f said North quarter;
Then�e westerty alor�g sais# saut� I�ne to the int�rsectio�t rnrith the west Ifne of �aid
Nc�rtfiwest quarter,
Thence wester�y crassln;g sa�d SE 164�`Av�in said S�ction 14 to the southeasL c�rner of
Lot 5, 8tack 1 of Cec�ar Park Five Acre Tracts in Valume 15 of Plats, Page 91F records nf
said County;
Aage 1 of 2 �o3�2y
+�,r� tir.r►�
Thence w�sterly alortg the south line of said Lcrt 5 to the southwest corr�er thereaf,said
southwest comer also bein�a point oR the easter�yr ma�n of said SE �6�"°Ave;
Thence st�utherty alo�g satd eascerly margin tc� the intersection with the easte�ly
extension of the soutMerly�ight of way nnargin of SE 134�'St;
Thence westerty along said easterty extensior� and cantinuing westerty, southwesterly
and southeriy a�long said southerfy margin to the intersectian with the easterly margi�n
- o€ l�a�h Ave SE, said easterly margin also being crn the eastern bour�dary of said City
Limits; .
Thence n�rtherly atong saic!easterly margin and saicf tirnit tine tc�the point nf begir�nln�.
Page 2 af 2 (0332J
��! a�,5 - ��C7 C.��, ..
t'6ll'v(}'t.ii���y TY, Wl�:+l"{�I`�{.�X+.)I�1 ("} �lSQt�G.7 dC :ia;.'f�. ���j� l.�`�'
DP!
�
�`_;���'�%a�'?'! '���{� �SM� •
,�,�. �,�,�;,,���rx���r �� ��r�v���s
��:��. �.sst,�a�s -��,�..�. �, »,� .�,��.��.�,�
... �����;:�r,c���.
� _ ....x€�ow•�i+.��`�sc�r tri�r wc,za .. � .
����r�n�c�t�a s�'r��«+ccncaa,�s n�o
otr��`M�CE.er�r�tr G�'+[�+sn�rr .
4re€Rf�i°L�4tiNtK i{}'�RCtv 9t4�3'6A9�t G�'f'A�.: . - •
7N�5 KAh.al?kCM".T4���'�4�,�,rp1YWk: +1fXNESi7�tATIi�h . , � . ..
frt'TkC�. 7�tlut�:A�hJU55i��qT 85!)H?i � � . -
a�Pft�e�+t t�E ca�s€�rt �+W�:NdTM+�rcqpJw�rC�:+rm+ .
'rtr �£Sx�as..3�f�'i b�w9+��{5} m s�+`�N£55 YM3:�t3�M� . � , ..
*�'�f SEF x7UR raw�}'S+WC 5FX5. . . , . , ,
5
. ' f9NiGtNaU, LECAf ���RTF7lL�N3. l2�v19BU t�GAL 3�SCRIPTi�YPtS
� �� :a+.s r�r wrcre�n resrsa�-�aui> � ,as. C"RAS� R£6F.kEMCE:
r.r�rr,m�v.ns tar s soca i.wr saur� .rw`r':aa+.A+a nr�+•wr or��s�t,�e�e, Ax*rar*ar a wnc�na mt�'�sunrn
da.'�SjCfCyY NC lE�UMWftlH
�i '" � a�+a�n�s+€caurea%r�us��a �.r�sw rw,r a�ar+arcrs.�+ra�to«
•f B +'tArF�1Yf!'!+` H�LLMO#W MMG`UtM>�NS+'- N'cl+ri TS 9r��+'�GF►1 M r0[ttA�S wf{'{bRa d�'TtAP.Ci dtlaY b �:'�
Rmr4sr s ���,y��_`S +�+P'to+<ud'SC'M�r[��s �d. oecar�'6 Ar�+!'+Lsrt4wi5T ttwpt� st+�p a •x mSYDea sz€3UA[r'aaY1w��a.c>+wC,±
—�— R/��/+^^REl F+�iK� r�riar•.�r rrrs ir�amrmY�S as+ras- ,i[��pa�+e�ae nr e.r'��e cr�F nra+�w s+�•+�resar.[e�a iw
S � _!i f�—� "Nr�rp ++K9 ACQNFi FN[b"�U'1`tk"-�IfK��' !f��TMP:.t.J9F °11H�t(��'/��13'C Lf{y�e RM S M:AL!�IKt$.M91AN{�1'jc MQ�9�
s�.'.�,�Nt� �N L� d.y4R{� .: -' !,}!,2�Cl"'TO'K S�I(bl dd'1:731`4#'MSYt7M NY/ N$C�'K Or�'+M�I�C4t.MT� l�MK•11?M
'�f`� '�''�'y��_ �y .P3�t '.t�+'14!{;E7.N7+qr7P-ECU? ` . .�'}+�&iD!33 N41'#f.1f'dP��iA�7�nM
'�'�..� �'�d4.1T 1"��n � SOSRK:K�€��N lfilll 11YT�t+K A1S�
dr! . twY f.Y&�p UN R:MYACC.+Or•,xp8�'tiY AdfHC fry,_-.. , '
R9�A e'kad,y Jt.r"+t.;1 *w srxom�wr cv ta=x�exr S.cis+�•.w- , s�u, t.�w�a oa.uf na nv�*+�d�t�� .
P e�'BP nM4'�,ae�p[zMs'Y'd au+Rki�H rt.�ar' .. +� eM'
SkaN N�"'r°� _ *�F„��xqF A�tl���Y�.� :G`8� . ,
CaaM M^--^„�.^..r.«_. 4"N�M IK"{M�'*I'4'LG� . , - - '.' � r .
•�,ers,tr�t i.+a»..+�..mar+l�terr�anw� �,a*a. •s "sw r+n.c z�a vae+a� � •
_._�__.___;.x�'�` r;'#�' '� a+ r$a��+X AiAt.Pr:AfC�A4. . . , � .
".....P...,�L.td�vr'-.��...-.�_�._. �tA
�N�tl ' W 4WYM'dYN!r�6 W��N�f/MaF}�Y BIi d��.'F !N AfR�"i�3 4� ���`l�Ik ...}Y'M�f���R!iQ��k t�iy'as�d�f�#�' r .�
.� s�.,w wsos•+�wr.+w«r.w�1...�..a . r„��+N..+�e�a y o*a etcK7+r cra��� -s. r+g*paw.ugp r�'€w l�7r 9,�erR.'s�'c,L'- .
•+ce�c*s.+�aecuxdcs�v.twe�.a +cux,ars 8A�i3 4P B�tNGS.
�Y ' t.'rE�tr stewos v+++rc:ca4wn. ata+w+��r+a��+ca.�K�r a�s+uc,rar� .
Y +
p�y�r �e,�P r °'; ,��,r�r. +�r�r sar••�.ex+cw+c,s.m.•,.:wr cv�.a:d„
�m
«s.i— +aw.aiwe y�.� ` M�'+�'r e+' rtR..vtr M�7t�Sob°ra:tlZ w+�d�isr�� ��E°�a�Is N'�nr
yp�� amr.t�� �7: . ��t�t1�tT's r0'tNC k?V1N tw[ett tM:*WM wtr , . .�p:wnqyswr fifhwtFA'or V�t'+Xh� • ct swssw+
•Vw" - ^�"1�"+W��`r..rss» �^•.T LM�W l�f,>,PNf14kYd�M�'If'SIE`M.µ�S$'-�M4+- 6M@�'J#.H'W.4�HMK0)
y{,y� W,�MeNd:d:M�t r+pWn�.^,K�.d«a'S�'w---•�- S�7t«�'laR I IMS�M{a[4ls tYl..fr Rdt 4i t++C K5I
. " . saf GY 5f�iDr S��K�Kt.y(+r�,p'J+M Kp`C�+d."�,
p B +d
' . SW N3'+{Mr'tfa.PJ+2Y'h?M!hS+N i�'KC�'+.".� -
. �5�Y�WAI�V.,,J�;;�°• � . . .
� ;laM!�F a+....e..e.,..........T`��....e.._........-✓.-• :D7 C'
y P*«ut roar++.w sw ron.� +M+ .�� ` , � Mc Ub7 z1�rfY�s.b^rH'sduu»r.w.<w'�n,a xis:•
^p' d
�". ,n'-:;a.i_.�. '=t�.�4'i....,. `�,n nf:rmr*� n*c rawr areb�kao r.crs�++**e s�-+ot*.ae3s:a Rnx�xc��.�ze=«. rr,o+xr:a�sruxY-s�a.rw�•r,,Ruw a�asnw�rn
.�
�r+ ew!�.+t,€n s,S�wwPw3 wr a�e � aaC�r+�r a.t.�r�tra�+�f,�ri.�e-�s�, . st n+cc«�.rrenn<r.rr raxam. ,wr+,.,Y rA+waa art ffi�+�Cre.N+na+,CMt
.,�mr�r»«waMa�d�W n�.rw.u�w+ ��°�n�X���•tn M � +�cna+�,wa r�Ex a r«zT�.c�au�^,r.a+ca+r.�s
��ecaaoc
1�bAWY ox ..
-..r- ��'�S' �_lt,tr:3,,1,� - .,
� � Aaea�.�,.._ait",�`"'�-"��,_.�. . . ' ...
�S nwa�t�+�n'�wti�xar'..�C'�,.�.
f5���4t1�r�Q�. .... , .
`tMEf'4�e'TR�EM a�eo �E,if'.[.cJ�'�uCMT �Det3 C .TK SEfi.'#^[T, ' , , ' � .
.. 7��� GtAt ;9i��,,...M,+�4Qt+• • . , ,
«� �.e
�' C^9Mttr. l��, EC*� �Ssr.crx IP,rie+sn . .. ' � . .. .
K+�;£�EtiT°i C�.'QkiktbENi.YK♦ ?Ra .t.,. . _ , , .
t
Ev�kH��C6+�"a'•k0 thH Ot�Mlt�'._. i►.._ � � ,
�`c..rr...�t..�_ .�G:..,t..sfl�a?___.
��+y Co�+t4 Mrae..a. peout�r r.t�q{�„nav M�e.war .. , _ � . .-
R[Ct�414/Cr'dC� � � - . . ,.
2txtaCae,i ZS�000a� �vw�cw��stes: ..
:�,NI3 4,���'�af'*'C��'� t��'P'fl�'s€���` ��. M.s peaxsr�uar�� ra� +re��;e� t5l+ c.�
}y�,,,R„4 0,.-,:
F°ECC7RGE��� uERi`F3C�sTE .. . ..... , u��R xcr, 'r�rxi+1*ex rr ��+atst . � .
ccD,�n+�E tw�s �i�:s w� *� .�g..;s,, s°i,,,.� �, r4 r_<" M '��. X al �
Trt•s�CArtaDac�v�N�.`£ �G.F.�S�t��f,i :a.r.ttiy:sp.+�nto x � SUit/�b4,T s6M L�t'KS,.�Ni�k;,w t�+'+ ..._. ___-.� ��.p�._ ,
;�md er.+r<e:.,�r 9m�u.ZS�t.day arr.'�.,+A�ntte"tl�++ e �w�er msbs vr w» w ,nae. .y a':rrcttac�n rH4 ?"U`tatE. rrf!' ,.C.G+1 sR+vc;iCk::d' .� '
135 f ,",q '�3� »cAn!vntuase r�fn a?taie o++a ceurriv stetuEa! 'NF �JWiPiv Ytii"iJt Cw?�r 6a' . � � ,� �
V+ bnaM o ot fi*�9$� '!�hi rne °rsue+�i v �m
.wN's 0 L�YwE% M�'4 4,, 19�� � it�� s�'#'F,�,li{Ha5?RL�1EM 9MH 6Y i,c+C ,�JG m, . � Y
/1�,,.__rV-�,,,• __�_--_ ��N/a.;: 7I'a+a9 t.tf:�'��_�4.�'{�x y� r
��`.�...� �6
ertwa s/ts.a� .�,..______._..
�41f.6Ru4�, w�x aa.ar�wtilwvA , d � _ c��kn Ae c�.w.0 ar[re
Ma� � ;cu;,� ,,�?.::Mraa -...�w�«:e, r�r. <`a�7"+ ,,�,.r�, ---_�..._.__._____...,_.._._. aea," tSt? t�r �
;�4`�`+,'°'{ o��° � !:� .� a t r '� ?..�-•o.;;�' ,.;..= R.
d�"°v�I'�idlr,4l3�i��'i��� Yf�^,J�Ii'+P,:Y�?I'� 'r?�.t�PA1� _ .
(' 1 CRON� � A:��', �3� ����" -
�r�t���.��;,�F�`r° l_lhat --*�— '
'��" ��+,:�.J�`"#�s�h;t � l,�E�� :�"UR��YAR�
' a'�iCJ. 1,'�1J1.�`,�f?(I.'� :�+�ar.. sr .�. ...u.�;.n�.s�•a.r
' � /)_,iran+.�, v cwrwr�°,_.w�r��`
� .fi_ ,.�.._ ...._ .......... ._e �t9K i35C 5( �AI^TY.^V:Yy•♦ . - YMA *[�
#ar"se'ae'kX�`
,i, r .».� .......... ,_„_� ;��40F�°yxG{ ��b. .,�
r
. .. .._.... _s..._. ........., r ,
' .., � �zas�,at .�.. � _..--._ ..w_ _.3�, ___ , .
_. ��. °�
, ��v'�, `; .. .
,. ._.�,.-.-- a,�,"'�,�,, .. �
� .aMBt�.�rhr..:xM�w ° . .
r:K7+3 'i�:G+�Y+��W AS S+s}r�e � . �'�°' E ' �
� PO+M4 MYO4MlM 43 4�5*nN� � .�`�'�� � ' •� „ �
�� � � ♦
* ".P'.4n�t i I9:i�Tj�J1 � 1 �,��r. �� »...,._..,.�'!+��j' + ' ' �
i :t'�ts;smr 5far7 � � � ' � - ., . . .
k
c mvMo�+usa::w:�,as ca�r1 � �q5`" ' . � p�� � �q�G� . � tSfS�'� � i7n�'� 4 {p"C�"� � y �
auK � , � �
.� .�� fi��, .� . , p
.�r .�r,�uvr ��( , —m��'u... . ! . I , i � �` �
�] y'[w� ��r.� iatr; � t
�• 9vPhF✓Y NNFS � q`yS" C 'JY S y k °. nM" �/•"Y � .�l1 t�t"#i " � ,.... _ ..._.... ..� t
T , ' _,... � �
} i 3 si rS+�P7` .'k!!#iY= � s
{� MI�s MF$y �q. 1 � { �'" .
�jy �'�,, �/' iM�lflit: 64=Y�Y,r '
•-• :yi�"w Mp� �, .".ARssy�J - .� ' N�"K.y'�;: .
;� "�yf1,° s�a 9 d"`�' '�k".�.._..._.. ..._..-,—.—..._,.— � �
M.�ri'Av A
`�. .$r Po'.-*Mt M.'iA5�AfY , � � �pr M+iT �p ,. , �. �� � .`"
� y
fV7 Ms�wMK t..i�� .... M��d � y ' �.�'f� �Y� • 3 ` �Y%��7� � �
e �, "��`�
�r.� :,�:u.,Ya �"" i rraw x �Y ., ' � +��� .. , �� � y :
., >F�'cw:a� �: aw« td i i
tri ru .w.3*f��sw,x i j ��.� $" � .� . �'',mt,.a.,� � � ;d.,, �� f
' ; � �� `��s � � � t t ���
»-.. . _.,..�____.,_....'"_».d+'f 1 � 2 • � i m".°Pdt eN4-k 6Mt CY': " i
st` �k.rn�+°c�� � ______`''" ''��� '"� s♦ ���� x<<.s�* s ',�i�r y • • 4 =: �
.__ _...�...._._ ,..._. . ,._�_._..i ` s:.:e�..:.�.:.- . � . �� � .:.a
� „ �4/' , ,Sa+*itfi�# atlt�'i'3tlY '$ .�
_ _-__._- � µ��, _�� . '� / _ , �
, �a�t�t_ _,�. _ _ ...
�wr �
. . _____- "-.t .��`4 ;" �";`=v."Q`( !c�.�y ��aa�.�e � �t+�r�' i}!€� � . I
I.. �� 4��,A
. '� '�.' r•� � � � i+,�r tM Lo f �.,t�� �48 iS.� �
�:,� , ' ' � `�r.�� ""���� �.. � ae�i u a
' . ' ' ��t� � x��i+ ,. � wF5 aYiJSt ,�� � �{4,,.4
I �
, ,. i,nt.<,.� .' MEKI*lI ' �..� - � � uf� b p� � 4E
d �('�.,:t}�S{j �"� Nri+Y- .,,q{ rt� n
� �}fh .`^�� ��T g�.'� w� � � 3 s 1
1 � GiK. '� „a..-,"�,J P.tw.r �� �� '
t
jE i �} i " p^49YAf . 3#}3'4Y.' i � E
r l i a . a� , i�,'YY ' ,+�°147pd�Y' ,+ � E �
l i ,-.i «+w�YNr't._a` ,sMxa•,t, j�� q� r,
� a s , :kx�nr a/�sa t st' � N �
. r.� �� +n+s � �c, I�..�"tar�rta-'���$ '
� I I ' ' . ' � .�e s'' zr� j �
� '� 3 '`' 1 4��� �� .. � � j �
�RAPHI�' �C�LE , • . ��"�' . u � ,
��' � �„ ��e� • �» i
. + � c i y1� e�. , , ; ,
I F C�� � �
� ���� �.�"�; . i �.l.��� �.�..
� s��; �,�����? �. � �:��`—� ``�-...
t az� reer � ` r�� 4T�" G� . . �
: ia¢k » Qfl tt. i � ' ��3,� .. w ' ���j�"
� s u .,.
i :�; , .
• %' �. 1y:5Pt?IL?N �,�' . " .�:,,�"-
p � � � 90 . C.�.!
".� ; '��' 'g�_.:+,� a5r�1/1. 4_1J .$;i;4R,��. M3I� :4.� �
.. '� . ` .._.
Is � . ' . ��. .
i R` �
i
+ ffM�It��""X.�^ ..._ .. _ _...,.._. '_ '_ es bw. C'r C�wC .a'Ya . �y
✓:`w:lr�,'.kFP'xc"_uX.'�a`R' �tl i.+�� n� �
reea�rw,.ra- r� ��`w,� SI rJRTHSt,RE't" S�1/wJ� <r'a3� ktC,'G�.r`-,,�"1* �'`?K
� -.._.V..._. ._�_.,�. .._. �,n[� +rrin+ _
.:rr.n a� x.�: �er �..
•Z.•„�s M 5 �7 :� ;r�
r
�
i�
� ��
=� Washington State Boundary Review Board
FoY Kir�g Coi�yity
�'cslc�r�Bitildirig, Room 240, 400 1"esl�r ti1/a��, Senttl��, tVA 9810-�
P)rofic: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206) ?9E�-h803 • litt�://zc�r��z��.kirtgcoi{�th�.goz�/nn�iexations
City of Renton
August 8, 2011 Planning Division
City of Renton
(��3L�C�C��MCQ
Attn: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
File No. 2329—City of Renton—Tess Area Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding
the legal description submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention.
If you are in agreement with the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please
submit a revised legal description to our office as soon as possible. The corrected legal
description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal.
We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering
recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division dated August 3, 2011
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures)
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w/o enclosures)
Nicole Keller, Road Services Division (w/o enclosures)
Kelly Whiting, Road Services Division, (w/o enclosures)
FORM 8
. ,
)
( v1r� �
RSGtIY�'D
AUG �zo��
Road Services Division Wr1 State Boundary Review
Department of Transportation Board Fpr King Co.
KSC-TR-0231
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
August 3, 2011
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0240
RE: City of Renton—Tess Annexation(BRB File 2329)
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Tess
Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your July 18, 2011 letter.
Staff reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it coincided with the enclosed
highlighted maps. Staff recommends the following revisions to the Tess legal description,
as per the attached red-lined copy:
Page l, Paragraph 2, Lines 4-5:
Where it reads:
"County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
20090304001157, records of said County;"
It should read:
"County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
20000125900002, records of said County;"
Page 1, Paragraph 12, Line 1:
Where it reads:
"Thence easterly crossing said SE 164th Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast
corner of..."
It should read:
"Thence westerly crossing said SE 164`h Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast
corner of..."
Page 2, Paragraph 1:
Where it reads:
"Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 6 to the northwest corner
thereof, said northwest corner also being a point on the easterly margin of said
SE 162°d Ave;"
�.�,Zo2M It should read:
/
, �
� ,
� �
Lenora Blauman
August 3, 2011
Page 2
"Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 5 to the southwest corner
thereof, said southwest corner also being a point on the easterly margin of said
SE 162°d Ave;"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review findings are as follows:
When reviewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of
unincorporated County that may have been overlooked by the City in developing the legal
description. For this particular annexation there are no overlooked islands of unincorporated
County.
Additionally, staff attempts to identify islands of unincorporated road rights-of-way that
may have been overlooked by the City in developing the legal description. The submitted
legal description does not exclude any adjacent annexable portions of rights-of-way.
There are no parks within the annexation boundary.
There are no Road Services Division's environmental mitigation sites, associated with past
King County road projects, as identified from available GIS data.
There are no King County-maintained off-road stormwater facilities within the proposed
annexation boundary, as identified from available GIS data.
There are no new streets within the proposed annexation boundary that remain under
maintenance-defect bonds with King County, as currently posted by the developer for the
required two-year maintenance-defect period.
There are no tax lots within the proposed annexation boundary that are parcels of land
owned by King County Road Services Division, as identified from King County Real Estate
Portfolio Management System.
There are no tax lots within the proposed annexation boundary that are parcels of land
owned by other King County departments, as identified from County GIS data.
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Nicole.Keller@kingcounty.gov.
Sincerely,
` ��
�
�
�(� Lydia Reynolds-Jones �
Project Support Services Manager
Engineering Services Section
LRJ:NK:mr
r ' �, ,,,,�y.
Lenora Blauman
August 3, 2011
Page 3
Enclosures
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., Interim Division Director and County Road Engineer,
Road Services Division(RSD), Department of Transportation (DOT)
Karen Wolf, Division Manager, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Gwen Clemens, Senior Policy Analyst, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Karen Freeman, Senior Policy Analyst, Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget
Daisy Tamayo, GIS Specialist, Department of Assessments
Paul McCombs, GIS Specialist, Department of Development and Environmental
Services ,
Richard A. Brater, P.E., Manager, Engineering Services Section, RSD, DOT
Mary Coltrane, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator, RSD, DOT
Rey Sugui, Program Analyst, Road Services Administration, RSD, DOT
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, RSD, DOT
' _ �� c.� <�
� ..- � � - '
� Exhibit C ��S
� -a�- ��
TESS ANNEXATION
� . Legal Description
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 and the Northwest quarter of
� Section 13 of Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington,
described as follows: �
Beginning at a point on the eastern boundary of the City Limits of�Renton as annexed by
� City of Renton Ordinance No. 5398, as filed under Recording No. zoo9o3oaoo115�, records
of said County, said point also being the westernmost northwest corner of Lot B of King
County Boundary Line Adjustment L99L3003, as filed under Recording No.
, records of said County;
20oov t Z S9 0 DOO Z
Thence easterly, northerly and easterly along the north line of said Lot B to the
3 northeast corner thereof, said corner also being the intersection of the westerly right of
way margin of 162"d Ave SE and the southerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
� Thence northerly along said westerly right of way margin, crossing SE 132"d St, to the
intersection with the northerly right of way margin of SE 132"d St;
S Thence easterly along said northerly margin, crossing SE 162"d Ave and SE 164th Ave, to
the intersection with the easterly margin of said SE 164th Ave in said Section 13;
(P Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with north line of the
Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter;
.,� Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 200 feet east of and �
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
v Thence southerly along said parallel Iine to the intersection with the north line of the
south 163 feet of the North quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Northwest quarter
� Thence easterly along said north line to the intersection with a line 400 feet east of and
parallel with the west line of said Northwest quarter;
(v Thence southerly along said parallel line to the south line of said North quarter;
j � Thence westerly along said south line to the intersection with the west line of said
Northwest quarter;
� �-��fil,�
Thence-��a��+Y'�cro�ing said SE 164th Ave in said Section 14 to the southeast corner of
� 2- Lot 5, Block 1 of Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts in Volume 15 of Plats, Page 91, records of
said County;
Page 1 of 2 (0332)
�iT�E N0. 2329 -- Ci'T'� OF RENTON — TE�S ANN�ATTt)N
� ' 4 � . � ,
� +�r ��.r
1-t' S �cx�1n
' Thence westerly along the south line of said Lot�to the�west corner thereof, said
est corner also being a point on the easterly margin of said SE 162"d Ave;
���
Thence southerly along said easterly margin to the intersection with the easterly
Z extension of the southerly right of way margin of SE 134th St;
Thence westerly along said easterly extension and continuing westerly, southwesterly
3 and southerly along said southerly margin to the intersection with the easterly margin
of 160th Ave SE,'said easterly margin also being on the eastern boundary of said City
Limits;
� Thence northerly along said easterly margin and said limit line to the point of beginning.
Page 2 of 2 (0332)
' '"�i„r '�rr�►`
=�#� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For Ki�ig Coicrity
� ''«° 1"esler Buildiftg, Room 2�0, 400 1'esler L1/izi�, Se«ttle, IVA 9�104
Phrnie: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (?OC) 296-6803 • htt��://wzozr.kurgcoirnh�.��oZ/c�fitrcx�ztioiis
July 20, 2011
Gity of Renton
Planning Division
City of Renton °
Attn: Angie Mathias,
Senior Planner (o�������D
1055 South Grady Way tnI
Renton, WA 98057
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2329—City of Renton—Tess Area Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting.
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at(206)296-6801.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Suininary
FORM 11
� � � �
SUMMARY
FILE NO. 2329 Thomas Guide Map No: 657
Date Received: 07/18/11
Date Distributed: 07/20/10
ENTITY City of Renton
Date Filed:
ACTION Resolution for Petition for Land Annexation
Expiration 45 Days: 09/01/11
TITLE Tess Area Annexation
Board Meeting: 08/11/11
Location The Tess Annexation site is located on the eastern side of the City of
Renton. The northernmost boundary is formed by SE 132�d Street. The
southern boundary of the site is formed by SE 134th Street and SE 133�d
Street (if extended.) The easternmost boundary is generally formed by
166th Place SE (if extended.). The westernmost boundary is formed by
160th Avenue SE.
Land Area Approximately 16 acres
Land Use: Existinq Uses: Single-family homes (seven dwelling units); vacant land.
Estimated Future Uses: Single-family homes (47 total dwelling units)
resulting from new development and redevelopment of land.
Population Existinq: Approximately 19 people
Estimated Future Total: Approximately 127 people
Assessed Vatuation: $2,509,000
County Comprehensive
Plan Designation Residential Use— Urban Medium Density
County Zoning R-4 (single-family;four units— 12 units per gross acre)
City Comprehensive Plan Proposed: Residential Low Density Single-Family Use (RLD)
City Zoning Proposed: R-4: Approximately one unit per net acre of �and zoned for
residential uses(13.65 acres.)
District Comprehensive Plan Not applicable
District Franchise Not applicable
Urban Growth Area(UGA) The Tess Area is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified
under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive
Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan.
1
r
� � �
SEPA Declaration The Tess Area was addressed in an Environmental Impact Statement
prepared for the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
Tess Area Annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW
43.21 C.222
ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED:
King County Council Member(s)Julia Patterson; Reagan Dunn
King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Natural Resources (DNR); Department of
Development and Environmental Services (DDES), Department of Assessments,
Department of Transportation (DOT), State Department of Ecology (DOE), King
County "911" Program, Office of Management and Budget, Deputy Prosecuting
Attorneys' Office, King County Records and Election Division, Fire Marshal
Division, Historic Preservation Program, Puget Sound Regional Council,
Community and Human Services, Public Health Department
Cities: Not applicable
Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 25; Renton Fire and Emergency
Services; King County Fire Protection Districts No. 40 and No. 43; Eastside Fire
and Rescue
Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90
Sewer Districts: Renton Public Works Department
School District: Issaquah School District No. 411
2
' ' '�rr"` +rrr�
SUMMARY—File No. 2329
The City of Renton proposes the addition of approximately 16 acres, known as the Tess Annexation.
Renton City Council adopted this annexation proposal in June 2010. The action is proposed under RCW
35A.14 via a 60% petition method of annexation.
The City of Renton is seeking annexation to resolve an unincorporated island area in order to more
efficiently govern and serve the Area. The proposed annexation is also in keeping with interests by
citizens in joining the City in order to participate in local government, to administer land uses under City of
Renton regulations, and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services)from Renton.
The Tess Annexation site is located on the eastern side of the City of Renton. The northernmost
boundary is formed by SE 132"d Street. The southern boundary of the site is formed by SE 134th Street
and SE 133�d Street (if extended.) The easternmost boundary is generally formed by 166th Place SE (if
extended.). The westernmost boundary is formed by 160th Avenue SE.
The City of Renton reports that the proposed Tess Annexation conforms to the State Growth
Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20, which
requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental
preservation. Additionally, annexation reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging
development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with
RCW 36.70A.020 (12), calling for public services to support permitted development.
The unincorporated Tess Area is included in the "Land Use ElemenY' of the City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan. The Tess unincorporated area is identified in the "Annexation ElemenY' of the City
of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The
proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation,
including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas and provision of services e.g., LU-I; LU-
37.1; LU 37.5; LU-36; LU-41 and LU-42.)
The proposal is reportedly also consistent with King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning
Policies for annexation. For example, the Tess Annexation is reported to address King County policies
that call for contiguous orderly growth of local jurisdictions and for local services to urban areas (e.g.,
Comprehensive Plan: U-304, U-208, U-301, U-304.). The King County Countywide Planning Policies
also establish cities as the appropriate providers of local governance and urban services (e.g., FW-13,
CO-1, CO-3; LU-31, LU-32, LU-33).
The City of Renton reports that the proposed Tess annexation is consistent with the provisions of RCW
36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). More specifically, RCW 36.93.180 requires that
annexations be evaluated with respect to nine objectives. In this application, the City of Renton has
stated that several key objectives have been identified as being potentially relevant for specific
consideration.
For example, City of Renton ofFicials report that Tess annexation would be consistent with Objective 1,
which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods as this area is linked to Renton by natural/built
geographic features (e.g., municipal boundaries, access routes, topography) and by social fabric (e.g.,
similar land uses, shared commercial centers, community gathering areas.)
This annexation would also reportedly be consistent with Objective 2 which calls for the use of physical
boundaries. The site is bounded by the City of Renton on the west side. The remainder of the site is
bordered by public rights of way and property boundaries.
Further, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logical service
areas, and Objective 4 through Objective 7, which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a
jurisdiction. The City is seeking annexation in order that all services and land use regulations affecting
this area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit to the benefit of the community.
3
`�''' i�1° ' .
.
Similarly, the City reports that this annexation would be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for
inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The Tess Area has been established for annexation
through the Renton Comprehensive Plan. This action is supported as well by the State Growth
Management Act and the King County Comprehensive Plan.
The City of Renton is prepared to provide the Tess Area with general administrative services, with review
of development, and with environmental protection (including evaluation and regulation of environmentally
sensitive areas, storm water/flood management.) For example, the City's Land Use Regulations set
standards for existing and new residences, public uses, and open spaces. Critical Areas control land
uses in order to protect environmentally sensitive areas.
The City of Renton will directly provide police service to the Tess Area. The City will provide fire service
and emergency medical services to the Tess Area properties via Renton Fire and Emergency Services.
The City of Renton will provide the Tess properties with utility services either directly or by contractual
agreement with service providers. For example, King County Water District No. 90 currently provides
water services to the Tess Area properties and will continue to do so. Future development at maximum
permitte� {evels can afso fikely be served by the District, however, it may be +�ecessary far the District to
required a certificate of water availability for such development.
With annexation, the City will also directly provide sewer services to the Tess Area. Stormwater
management will be provided in a manner consistent with the City of Renton Stormwater Manual, King
County standards, and applicable State of Washington guidelines.
Tess Area residents would have access to Renton libraries, parks, and recreation facilities. Law and
justice services and human services would, similarly, be provided to the citizens of the Tess Area.
Students would continue to be served by the Issaquah School District.
City of Renton officials report that the Tess Area Annexation, at existing levels of development, will
generate expenditures of$1364 and revenue at$9,209. At full development, the Tess Area will generate
expenditures of$42,158. Revenue at full development is estimated at$36,815.
Tess Area property owners will assume their share of the regular taxes/fees (e.g., property taxes) and
special levy rates of the City. With those revenues, and other revenues available to the jurisdiction, City
officials report that there are sufficient funds to undertake the costs for governance and service to the
Tess Area in a manner equivalent to levels of service provided to citizens of the existing City of Renton.
The City looks forward to serving the citizens of the Tess Area.
4
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.304543
INVOICE NUM*RRa^.-' ''�' DAFE OESCRtPTION P.O.NUMBER DISCOUNT/RE7AIN AMOUNT
TESS 07/05/2011 NOTICE OF INTENT FILING FEE FOR THE 0.00 50.00
�� DATE � � � �/ Q� 3 2 0 813
� � RECEIVED FROM �C V � ���"�-�/� J �+ a�� �
�
� �v l���� �� DOLLARS
QF R RENT �/ LI � � ���
U oR l 6
ACCOUNT ; Q CASH �
I � MONEY FR _ TO
PAYMENT � �6 Q O ORDER
� -�— C1-IECK ,
BAL.DUE ' � F•(,�P,��
� O CREDIT � gy
CARD ��+ �i 82
Cit�r �f Renton
Pla��ning Division
�'�` s`;! " r ��.��;i
!t�tl���tl�I�l5�
- 50.00
.. , . -��x_ .�:r r:.. ��
,,�' ��r�,'�
- '°` � �'B$', �
rs t's 3 1 �+ �� .''�!-'�`� J �i L z
4�8 7����p ��ckn s��.r�-��.;!ua. ,
WCZSI1t31g'IOft StC�tP BOIL31CI11Y1�RQZ�iPZC�Board
For Kiftg Col�ltti�
1"es(c•r B��ildn�g, Roont?-�D. �}00)eslcr 1ti'rry.Se�ntNr, 11'A 9470�
�
City of Renton
Attn: Angie Mathias,
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
._.._.._,__.._.._r...:...:...�. :.•..-�- : F .; ! : ; ; :: : : :� : .( : -
... ....»..... . ... «....�......_ � ... ... ... fEitiileeFiliii?ifiti::iiii:}iiii6iliet�i2i`iti;i;if;i�iei:fl�
r �r '°'�'
'
NOTICE OF INTENT
PROPOSED TESS ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF RENTON
I. BACKGROUND/MAPS
A. Basic Information
1. The proposed action is to annex approximatety 16-acres to the City of Renton.
Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations
and processes and to receive Renton public services.
2. The annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW
35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150.
3. The proposed annexation area is located in the Northwestern quarter of Section 14,
Township 23 North, Range 5 and the Northwestern quarter of Section 13,Township 23
North, Range 5.
4. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed
annexation:
a. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the February 7, 2011 public meeting of the Renton
City Council in the matter of the proposed annexation.
b. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the June 20, 2011 public hearing of the Renton City
Council in the matter of the proposed annexation.
5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222, annexations are exempt from SEPA.
6. Exhibit C: A legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries.
B. The following maps are enclosed:
1. Exhibit D: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed Tess
Annexation boundary.
2. Exhibit E: A copy of King County Assessor's Annexation Petition Certification.
3. Exhibit F: Eight (8) sets of vicinity maps displaying:
a. The proposed Tess Annexation boundary.
b. The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation
area.
c. All major streets and other major physical features.
d. The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special
service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal.
e. King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area
boundaries established under the Growth Management Act.
4. Exhibit G: Eight (8) copies of a map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon
which the proposed Tess Annexation boundaries have been delineated.
� ii _.� ., , i :.`lPlli'.� � � ♦
.. p �Il'_� �-,�E;_;'.n�.�i�'T,.�itif;
A
5. Exhibit H: Eight (8) copies of a map showing City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Designations for the proposed annexation area.
II. EVALUATION CRITERIA
A. Overview
1. Population: The current population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to
be about 19 persons in 7 dwelling units. The area is comprised of single family
dwellings and vacant residential land. If the area were to develop to full capacity over
the next ten years, given the proposed zoning, it is estimated that the total population
of the area would be 127 persons in 47 dwelling units. The City of Renton population
as of April 2011 was 92,590.
2. TerritorY: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 16-acres.
3. Population Densitv: It is estimated that the population density at build-out would be
approximately 7.93 persons per gross acre.
4. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for
annexation is approximately$2,509,000.
B. Land Use
1. Existin : The existing land uses include single family dwellings and vacant residential
land.
2. Proposed: Proposed use is single family residential.
C. State Growth Management Act
1. The proposed action is consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA) in general
and in specific aspects. GMA established cities as the jurisdictions intended to govern
urban areas and encourages citizens of unincorporated lands to join existing cities.
This proposed annexation would facilitate this aspect of GMA. Additionally, in
compliance with GMA, the City of Renton has identified areas where it is logical to
extend the community and where the City can provide government services. Those
areas comprise the City's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and by their nature are
within the Urban Growth Area (UGA).The proposed Tess annexation is within the Cit�s
PAA and therefore is within the UGA and is also therefore urban in nature. The
annexation meets the first goal of the Growth Management Act, which seeks to direct
development to areas that are urban. This annexation is within an "urban area where
adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner".
2. King County Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances
a. King County Planning under the Growth Management Act.
i. The subject area is designated Urban Residential Medium, 4 - 12 du/ac in the
King County Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's
Potential Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map.
King County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have
included ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at
urban densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton
Page 2 of 9
' "�W" ,.a:,r,�^ ; .. ,.`: , , ,` � ` � , `r�y''
�
has planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services
within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur.
b. The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically
support the proposed annexation:
i. Chapter Two, Urban Communities, Section 1.3, Urban Growth Area Targets
(U-115) King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential,
commercial, and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated area. This
land capacity shall include both redevelopment opportunities, as well as
opportunities for development on vacant lands.
a. The area was prezoned by Renton with R-4 zoning that wil� become
effective upon annexation;the King County zoning is R-4. Renton's zone
in this area retains adequate land capacity for residential and park use,
as is allowed in King County.
ii. Chapter Two, Urban Communities, Section 11 Potential Annexation Areas
(U-204) King County shall support annexation proposals that are consistent
with the Countywide Planning Policies and the Washington State Growth
Management Act, and when the area proposed for annexation is wholly
within the annexing city's officially adopted PAA.
a. The proposed annexation is consistent with Countywide Planning
Policies and the Growth Management Act. Additionally, the area is
wholly within the City's adopted PAA.
c. The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in
general, and the following policies in particular:
i. LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and
in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall
designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall
be specific to each city.
ii. LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potentia)
annexation area. All cities shall phase�annexations to coincide with the
ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services
to areas to be annexed.
a. The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the
City's Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit H). Renton has the ability to provide
a full range of urban services to the area proposed for annexation.
iii. LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. Cities are
the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas either
directly or by contract. ,
a. Fire District #25 currently provides fire suppression and emergency
service to the area. Service in Fire District #25 is provided by Renton
Fire and Emergency Management under contract. Upon annexation
Renton Fire and Emergency Management will provide service directly to
the area. The area is within the Water District #90 sewer service area;
Page 3 of 9
� •.-. ��J.�i'.'y ,�-):JI.I: �:�.Y�a1�IL-.✓,'�l'.,. ' �
•
� _ i�i i'lT_,�, - I eSS%',f1llt.�.31101�
� ,
annexation will not affect the water district service area and water
service will continue to be provided by Water District #90. Renton is
prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area
including police, local government, and other community services. The
site will remain in the Issaquah School District.
d. Adopted King County Comprehensive Plan designation.
i. The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the
proposed annexation area is Urban Residential Medium, 4 - 12 du/ac
implemented with the R-4 zone.
e. Comparison of City and County regulations for sensitive areas, etc.
with annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted
with those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations
applicable to the proposed action include the following:
i. Re�ulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's
Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and prohibited
activities and uses, waivers, modifications and variances, and additional
criteria and permit processes for development in critical areas. Critical
areas regulated by the Ordinance include: streams and lakes, wetlands,
aquifer, flood and geologic hazard areas, and habitat. Although specific
regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the
King County Code provides comparable regulatory protection of sensitive
areas. The City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon
request.
ii. Regulations for the preservation of a�ricultural or other resource lands:
Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the subject
area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural
districts identified for first, second, or third priority for the purchase of
development rights. Further, the property is not designated for
agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The City of
Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of
development rights.
iii. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton has
no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and Preservation
of Landmarks, Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King County Code.
However, no landmark sites or districts are known to exist in the subject _
annexation area.
iv. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton had adopted standards
equivalent to the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for
Western Washington, as required by the Ecology National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase 2 Municipal Stormwater
Permit for Western Washington. The new manual specifies standards for
things such as erosion control, conveyance system, flow control facility and
water quality treatment system design to control storm water runoff from
new construction. It is expected that any development that may occur in
the future will be evaluated on a project level basis and at that time the
Page 4 of 9
� �.
� � �'�li:� .�.i- ''�.:'.'I`'i� �rl:'(l: �
. , :'�I �i L_ i�- � . r. i
effects proposed development may have on the environment would be
evaluated, and if mitigation were appropriate the effects would be
mitigated. In regards to annexation and the possible effects on surface
water in this area, the application of King County's Surface Water manual
would result in the same conditions of development in the City as would
occur in the County and therefore annexation has no effect in this matter.
D. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise
1. City Planning Under the Growth Management Act.
2. PAA status and PAA agreements with other cities, if any.
a. The City of Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area
includes three sub-areas,which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and
on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has also
negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA
agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed for annexation. The
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas,
including the area currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use
designations for such areas.
3. Comprehensive Plan approval date.
a. Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995,
consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995
Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth Management
Act Comprehensive Plan Review.
4. The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Renton
Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands:
a. That are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the availability of
infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities
(Objective LU-I);and
b. That are peninsulas and islands of unincorporated land where Renton is the
logical service provider(LU 37.1);and
c. That are available for urbanization under county comprehensive planning,
zoning, and subdivision regulations (LU-37.5); and
d. For which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban
infrastructure and services(LU-36); and
e. That would include those who already use City services or who impact City
infrastructure (LU-41); and
f. That are lower density areas where it would protect natural resources (LU-42).
5. Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if any.
a. No amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the
current proposed annexation.
6. Required franchises to serve area.
Page 5 of 9
�r�r+' „ .;�,_.., , ,,_�. �r .
- � - , �
a. No franchise will be required for the City of Renton to provide services to the
subject area.
7. Proposed land use designation.
a. The subject area is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City of
Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
E. Planning Data
1. Revenues/Expenditures. This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and
costs associated with annexing the subject properties as they are currently
developed, as well as estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development,
which is anticipated to occur over a ten-year period. "Full development" does not
equate to the absolute zoned capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a
portion of the subject properties will not develop within the foreseeable future due
to market forces and the choices of individual property owners. All assumptions
regarding revenues and costs are based on existing standards or other comparable
data, but actual results are likely to vary from these estimates. In general, costs
associated with utilities have been assumed to be supported by the rates charged for
those services.
a. Assessed Valuation:
Single Multi- Population Assessed
Family Family
Units Units �est.) Valuation
Current conditions 7 0 19 $2,509,000
Full development (est.) 47 0 127
b. Estimated City Expenditures:
City Services Current 10-Year
Per Capita Costs $1,189.48 $10,696.96
Per Acre/Call/Mile $7,659.56 $22,877.56
Per FTE $360.32 $3,240.38
Total ongoing costs $1,364.05 $42,158.35
c. Estimated City Revenues:
Revenue Source Current 10-Year
Regular Property Tax Levy $7,105.66 $52,179.13
State-Shared Revenues $638.06 $4,284.14
Miscellaneous Revenues $2,829.69 $22,509.99
Page 6 of 9
� y�, �_., �,. , .:-��, _,�, ,,rr.
h::: ..._ � A��:<,.r,��u�:
� �
Total revenues $9,209.37 $36,814.91
d. Estimated Net Fiscal Impact:
Net Fiscal Impact
Existing $1,364.05
Full $42,158.35
e. Estimated County Revenues Lost:
1. It is estimated that revenues generated from King County road and library
levies, excluding library bonds would be reduced.
f. Estimated Reduction in County Expenditures:
1. It is estimated that there would be a reduction in County expenditures to be
recognized in areas such as in road maintenance.
g. Estimated Fire District Revenue Lost:
1. It is estimated that the reduction in revenue for Fire District # 25 upon
annexation to Renton would be minimal.
h. Estimated Fire District Expenditures Reduced:
1. The estimated savings to Fire District #25 because of this annexation is
assumed to on balance with the estimated reduction in revenue.
F. Services
1. Water Service
a. The area will continue to be served by District No. 90 for the foreseeable future.
Future development will have to notify District No. 90 regarding water
availability and obtain a certificate of water availability prior to future
development. Population growth under the City of Renton's proposed R-4
zoning may be smaller than what would be allowed under the County's zoning,
due to Renton's using net density compared to gross density. Therefore, the
District's capacity should be adequate for the water demand generated by any
post-annexation development in the subject area.
2. Sanitary Sewer Service
a. The area is within the City of Renton wastewater utility service area. It is
anticipated that if sewer improvements occur in the future in this annexation
area they will be will be made through developer or homeowner extensions.
3. Fire Service
a. Fire District #25 currently provides fire suppression services to the annexation
area. This fire service is provided under contract by Renton Fire and Emergency
Services. Upon annexation Renton Fire and Emergency Services will provide
service to the area directly. Fire Station #16 is the nearest fire station to the
annexation area. The response time is approximately 3.5 minutes. The station is
fully manned with a three full time personnel and is equipped with a fire engine,
a reserve engine, and an aid car. Each shift at the fire station is staffed with
Page 7 of 9
� ' ''iF:L��ii � _�.J',!. -..,,. , :-�ic'`�.,-�, ., �
•
. - .. '�'l._, -- ._. .,� ;I�'... .
. `
EMT/D-Fib personnel. The fire rating is ISO 3. Valley Com is the source of
dispatch for fire and emergency services.
G. General
1. Annexation agreements for extensions of service.
a. No applicable annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area.
2. Topography and natural boundaries.
a. The topography of the area includes no regulated slopes. There is a small area
near the center of the site that has 25 — 40% slopes. The low point of
approximately 460 feet is at the eastern portion of the area with the high point
of approximately 520 feet occurring at the eastern portion, a 7% slope overall.
There are no streams or wetlands identified within the annexation area.
3. Projected 10-year growth.
a. The number of housing units in the area is projected to grow from 7 single family
homes to 47 single family homes. The population in the area is projected to
grow from 19 people to 127 people, based on 2.7 persons per housing unit.
4. Municipal or community services.
a. With annexation, the property owners would have access to a full range of
urban services including police, fire, parks, libraries, community services, and
.readily accessible local municipal government.
5. Potential delays in implementing service delivery.
a. The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for
seven years after annexation, according to state law. At that time, the area
would then be included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. City
departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be
able to adequately serve existing and future development. With the exception
of solid waste removal, no delays are expected in implementing service delivery
to the area.
6. Evaluation of adequacy, costs, or rates of service to area.
a. Existing services to the area appear to be adequate. If the City were to assume
this annexation it would have an estimated initial fiscal impact of $1,364 per
year. At full development it is estimated that the area would have a positive
estimated fiscal impact of$42,158 per year. Services provided by King County,
such as sheriff and road maintenance would become services provided by the
City of Renton. School district boundaries will not change, as they are not
affected by annexation. As a result, the subject area will remain within the
Issaquah School District.
III. OBJECTIVES
A. The proposed Tess Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the
Boundary Review Board. These include the following:
1. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
Page 8 of 9
,� '�L4(;l:' ' ".,'liil". , _.�-\.'_ J'...:C; �
♦ �d �` _
� ni�-:i+ �_�. ',r.,��,>.:;��,r;
� �
a. No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are
anticipated to result from the proposed action.
2. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways,
and land contours.
a. The proposed annexation is bordered by Southeast 132"d Street to the north,
parcel lines to the east, Southeast 134th Street to the south, and 160th Avenue
Southeast to the west. The existing City limits of the City of Renton abut the
annexation area at the west.
3. Creation and preservation of logical service areas.
a. City staff that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the
proposed boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for the provision of
City services. Also, the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the
appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas such as this. The
proposal would, therefore, further both the intent of the City annexation
objectives and Countywide Planning Policies.
4. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries.
a. The boundaries do not create abnormally irregular boundaries.
5. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated
urban areas.
a. Not applicable.
6. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
a. Not applicable.
7. Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
a. This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries.
8. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas, which are urban in character.
a. King County has designated this area for urban development.
9. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
a. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated
Rural or designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the
King County Comprehensive Plan.
Page 9 of 9
_ SE 131 st St "'
�
� � ��� � � ; SE 1 st ���
¢
v Private Rd � � ---�` ���
�, - --_.���.� � �.
Q � � � ��
CO
, _,t ,
� .e-.� �—
"� � � � � � ;
�, , 4 __ .
00 � -�
� �� ..�.w_
� SE 13
;
--�—_�__��
�__ Private Rd _
' SE 132nd PI
a
t _ � s ���
_. ... . .,......._'.T'��.._. �.. .'
r
ivate-Rd
�
� ,
�� _ .m..�
w ,
cn �: � � -._..._._�_�__,__.�._
a� � ; _
¢ � ---
w W _��
� - SE 134th Pl � _m_,.____�_--�--,__;.. �--.... � �
� > � ` � �� � � � m
Q �' < _
�
� �
_ .
. �
-.
� � � :,������ � SE 135th St �
` �
m
FileNamc.:ACEG��'( rrmg`.0 I �,�:;IS�rojEcts'�annexations4 F2bfU8f�/7, 2���
tess_annex\rnxdst�_tess_tiiancx_vicinity.mxd
0 310 6ZFeet y+J � e�� � c�� �� Tess An n exati o n
� �� %A� , ,..v,,.,�.
1:3,200
N Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administruux
Achiana A.Johnsca�,Plunning Tech 11 �,„�
��ryof QAnnexation Boundary
_.�i''"�`c� �, f I C�' (" ��� � '_"'City Limits
_ .��.__ ::.��1 ..,,, �._.�
�� ° � Parcels
�iTY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BIC�'`
ai#:
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. CED/Long Range Planning June 6, 2011
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias x6576 Agenda Status
Consent.............. X
Subject: Public Hearing.. X
Tess Annexation—Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition Correspondence..
Ordinance.............
Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Issue Paper Study Sessions......
60% Direct Petition Information.........
King County Certification Document
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur to set public hearing. Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Ot h e r...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Council received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex on December 16, 2010, to annex
approximately 16.3-acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area. The proponent's petition has been certified by King County as having
signatures representing at least 60%of the area's assessed valuation.
Under State law, the Council is required to hold a public hearing to consider the annexation
petition and the zoning in order to provide interested parties the opportunity to speak.
Following the public hearing, Council may approve the annexation of all or any portion of the
area proposed for annexation. The site is currently designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on
the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The area was prezoned R-4 (allowing four
dwelling units per net acre) as part of the East Renton Plateau prezone (Ordinance#5254).
The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the
Boundary Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set June 20, 2011, for a public hearing to consider the 60% Direct Petition and proposed
zoning for the Tess Annexation and to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of
Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County.
,��, `"'+�`
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY p c'ty°f �-
& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Q��00� �����
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 6, 2011
T0: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor �
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator x6592 ��
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner x6576
SUBJECT: Tess Annexation -Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition to
Annex
ISSUES:
Should the City Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex from the Tess
Annexation Area now that the petition has been certified by the King County
Department of Assessments?
If the City Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, should the Administration be directed
to forward the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review
Board?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex the 16.3-acre Tess
Annexation site;
• Council authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent for
the Tess Annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King County for
their review.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
At its February 7, 2011 public meeting, Council accepted the 10% Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation petition and authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition
to Annex. City of Renton departments reviewed the annexation proposal and all staff
reported that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services
and systems. There were no issues identified that would impede the annexation. A
more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments are
contained in the Department's February 7, 2011, Tess Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
issue paper.
Zonin
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the annexation area is
Residential Low Density (RLD). The area was prezoned Residential Four Dwelling Units
Terri Briere,Council PresidP�`
Page 2 of 2 ,o,�,,, �
June 6,2011
per net Acre (R-4) as part of the East Renton Prezone (Ordinance #5254). The R-4 zoning
will become effective at the time of annexation.
Revised Fiscal Analysis
At the direction of Council, Staff has been working on revising the methodology and
assumptions used to analyze the fiscal impact a proposed annexation is anticipated to
have on the City. Many revisions have been made to the analysis to try to more
accurately reflect the financial impacts an annexation may have upon the City.
One of the principal changes made is to evaluate departmental costs based on what
"drives" that cost. For example, the cost of an annexation area to the City for police
service is driven by calls for service. Costs for street maintenance are driven by the lane
miles within the area. There are also now more City divisions included in the cost
analysis. For example, costs to provide human services, special events and
neighborhoods, as well as parks planning and natural resources have been added. The
costs estimates are based on the 2011 budget and the official Census population figure
(90,927). An effort was made to not include costs associated with staffing positions
unlikely to be impacted by small incremental annexations, e.g. supervisors, directors,
etc. The revenues for the analysis are derived from the 2011 budget assumptions
specifically associated with the Benson Hill area. Finally, factors for inflation to both
revenues and costs have been added.
The fiscal analysis is continuing to be refined and has been circulated to departments for
their review. Fiscal analysis for the Tess annexation using the revised model is attached.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Tess Annexation has been certified as having sufficient signatures
representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable
boundaries and appears to comply with Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing
staff raised no objections to this annexation. The proposed Tess Annexation furthers
the City's Business Plan goals and is in the general welfare and interest of the City. The
Administration recommends the Council accept the 60% Direct Petition and authorize
staff to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King
Co u nty.
Page 2 of 2
�, �ity of Renton
� P(anning Divisior�
iF`S {� ;f�:
� e . . C. � .�u
King County ��������D
Department of Assessments
Accounting Division Lloyd Hara
500 Fourth Avenue,ADM-AS-0725 f�SSeSSOi'
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
(206)296-5145 FAX(206)296-0106
Email:assessor.info@kingcounty.gov
http://www.ki ngcou ntv.eov/assessor/
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted Apri125, 2011 to the
King County Department of Assessments by Angie Mathias, Senior
Planner for the City of Renton supporting the annexation to Renton of
the properties described as the Tess Annexation, have been examined, the
property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties
listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records,
and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the
provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 35A.01.040.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the
petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures,
nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time
frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case.
Dated this 20th day of April, 2010
.
�-
a, King County Assessor
i;
�, � �
��
i�
i; �2 � ? � � r) ~ �u 6 C�� NI��-�►�
:� ��2 s5
_- --- --- -_. .,�_...-- --- _-- --- __-- - - ---
, -------- -- - - ------ - -
i:
- _ - - ---- - ' ----- ----- ----- --- -- - - -
--- -
- -- ------ - --- -------
- -- -- - ----
- --- - -
I: .
.
f �� _ ' W -�r - a�`�--�- - --- ------ - --- --
- --- -- --- �- �- -- �r�'1 - -
-- ----- - - '�- -- --------- �� �3z-"� --��-�-�-f -- _�-���
-�- , � ___ ____ _ __ _
,�
�4 . _ . .
�� �Q G. `t1Lt �
-- - -- ---- �+ --- ----------- --- - --_- _-- - -------- --- -
; //� / c._.� (�t �p
�i f 1;!���? �--- - -1 �-� � ------ L .C�._- ��d'�-5-
� �
- ----- -- - - - - -----
�� --�? �_d�r%�� (..�`_�_
------ --- --�'_---------- - - -�`�-' -- - - - - --- - - - -- - -
�
!�
-- - ---- -- r� - - --- -- - ------- ---
,�
�;
2 .�� � �-
_ - - - ---��- - -- - --- --- -
�� ��+� �- �
- --- ---- ---- - ------- - --- _ _-- - ---- -
-- - - ---- i� -------- _ ----- -
;; �_
---��-5 ���IG,�.s--- -- -
' ��� --
; ,
- --- --�----- - ---- - - - - --�'�
� .
------ -_ _---- - -------
^-�-v �-��'-- _�� C�V' y�. s —���e.�'
�""_ '_'_' _"J___ "'"" _ ' "_' _"_ �_._'____ . _ .R ._____"__-_ __"
i �
�i
.i
_""'_"_-____'__'__-_ �) "-" "'_""_'_"__-'___-___ ______"_"_ " "___' '__""__ __"-_""'
- _"_________ __'_ _ '"___ _____ _'_"_"_ _"____""_ '"__"_ _"___'___" _"_
_ " "� .._""' ___'__`__-__
I�
�
_' _'__"_"' -'_""____ � -'--"_-____"'" ___ - --
�"'__'" '__-_-"____' ""_"_"'_'__''___"__'___'__ _"_ _____ ______'__"_' "'_" "
i,
I�
_ _. _ _.-.____- . ._._ _ _ _..___ ._--____________.__. .__
.' __-_ _ _____. ._._-._ ._.
�f
��
�
-------�f--------- -- - - - - ------- -------------------- - ---- -- --
t�
' _ ""' '__' ___ __ _ �� _._... '______"___
_ ..._'-' ___"-'_ -.- ____'_ - _ "___'-_ _'__'__ '______
'�_'_'__ ____ _' ''__'_'_______ -_'_
i}
I
----- -- ----- - -- ' ------------ -----------
-�--- ----------- _ --
�i
1�
--- ---- -- ---- ------------------ —
----- -- --- - -------- - -- - ------
—1—i--—
i
��
� ------ ---------- -------- -
- --- -- ------- - ----------- -- -- --- --- ---- ----------
!
��
---- ....._---_. .._ _ ----'� ----- ------- --------- - -- - ---- ----------- ------ ----------- -- ----- ---- -
i�i
_------- --- -- ---------- ---- ---- --- ----------
1
i
— — --- ---- — — — -------- --- — — ----- —
— — -----—
i
————--------- — � ——---- ------------ —_---—
i:
,�
-------------- -------— __ --- ---- -- -----
—--- ---------- -- ---- -- ---- —--------------
s�
i
f
— ------- ----- --- ---——--------- — ——--- ---
------ ———— �fi--------------- —------ —
�
}
�
�a�� 'f7) � c.d a�-� -------� �� ��-� �-�� ��S�� �} z-�- �( -7 � �2 �n '
w
SE 131st St �
¢' SE 13 st
�
�
N
Cfl
�
����. �� : -� _..�..�,i .., �
W�W�'j ` �iM�i��—=-- ..,..,.. . �
. . —���.,,� ,; .
� —�—*++.�:;�£�. , �..
�'
ra'
�:
SE 132nd PI � �I
�
�; I
� � �
� a
:______����__�__�
�.
, ��.���___._�_..�__�__��_��_
� , ��.� � _
i �
i
s
1',
i'
'�
I
I'
.__ �
w w
SE � � �
Q Q �
� � �
o � `° 1
�
SE 135th St
f�le Narne: \CED\!'lanning'.�IS\GIS_.projecislannexationsl December 17,2��0 �2�'[�
I�, s .�nner ni dsV1 iF s �nnex vicinily.mxd �
0 287.5 57Feel : t ,� �tt� .,,.:, � 1 ��� ����/\�����
13,200
i
N �.�} Y �� Vicinity Map
Community& Economic Development l-,. � '�
Alex I'ietsch,.4dministratnr ``�
^�^�^a^.���n�n,P��°�ngT���� �' �� ��� '1.=;;City Limits ����TessAnnexation Boundary
s� , �,�,r-�
�� ,�'"�,� ��'�.��� �� �� �',, �,��� �1 Parcels �. ������� Tess Annexation Parcels
,,.�� .� .�.�.�T., �J � ,�..,.� ,
� .. � r� �,
,�,y,. �"'"`
Angie Mathias
From: Steve Beck[stevebeck@johnlscott.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 4:12 PM
To: Angie Mathias
Cc: Diane Schwartzenberger
Subject: Tess Annexation
Angie
Let this e-mail serve as an approval and acceptance to allow the following parcel of land to join the Tess Annexation . . .
Tax ID# 132305-9045
Gregory Thompson
13231 166th Ave SE
Renton,WA. 98059
425-417-8230
.75 acre Parcel with a 1890 Square foot single family home.
2011 combined accessed land & house value= $313,000
Thankyou
Steven A. Beck
Manager
Newfourth LLC
425-444-0461
1
�rrrfY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILI�r�'
ai#:
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Department of Community and January 24, 2011
Economic Development
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias, x6576 Agenda Status
Consent.............. X
Subject: Public Hearing..
PROPOSED ANNEXATION Correspondence..
Tess Annexation — 10% Notice of Intention to Ordinance.............
Commence Annexation Proceedings Petition Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Issue Paper Study Sessions......
10% Petition Information.........
Map
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Ot h e r...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The petitioners submitted this petition to the City Clerk on December 16, 2010. The proposed
13.6-acre annexation site is located in Renton's Potential Annexation Area, abutting the eastern
portion of the current City limits. State law requires a public meeting with the proponents
within 60-days of their submittal to consider their request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set February 7, 2011 for a public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intention to Commence
Annexation Proceedings petition for the proposed Tess Annexation.
W �
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D Q Cityof
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ����O� �O
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 24, 2011
TO: Terri Briere, Council President `r , �
City Councilmembers �1/ ti
� � i�
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor ��'
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, x6576
SUBJECT: Proposed Tess Annexation—10% Notice of Intent Petition
ISSUE:
The City is in receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent petition to annex 16.3-acres for the proposed
Tess Annexation area by the direct petition method. State law requires that the Council hold a
public meeting with the annexation proponents within 60 days of receipt of a 10% Notice of
Intent petition. The purpose of the meeting is for Council to decide whether to accept or reject
the proposal and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of City zoning consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan, if the proposed annexation is successful.
RECOMMENDATION:
On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the
10% Notice of Intent petition. If Council concurs, the Administration recommends that it take
the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120):
• Accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition; and
• Authorize the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition of Annex for the 16.3-acre area; and
• Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area accept City of
Renton zoning that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion of the City limits in
the East Renton Plateau area.The Tess Annexation Area is bordered to the north by Southeast
132nd Street, to the east by 164th Avenue Southeast, to the south by Southeast 134"d Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
1. Location: The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is bordered by the existing eastern
edge of the City limits in the East Renton Plateau area.
Proposed Tess Annexation 10%a Notr,�,, Intent ,,,,�+
Page 2 of 5
2. Assessed value: The 2010 assessed valuation of the subject annexation site is
$2,509,000.
3. Natural features: The area is generally topographically level with slopes of
approximately 6% over the length of the area.
4. Existin� land uses: There are seven single-family residences and vacant residential
property.
5. Existin�zonin�: Existing King County zoning is R-4. This area was prezoned by the City of
Renton as part of the East Renton Plateau pre-zoning. City of Renton Ordinance #5254
prezoned the area with R-4 zoning; this zoning will become effective upon annexation.
6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation
site as Residential Low Density (RLD).
7. School District: The Tess Annexation area is in the Issaquah School District.
8. Public services: All responding City of Renton departments and divisions noted that the
annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems and
presents no foreseeable problems. Specific comments follow:
Water Utility. The subject site is located within Water District No. 90's water service
area by agreement under the coordinated water system plan. A certificate of water
availability from District 90 will be required prior to the issuance of development
permits within the subject area, following annexation to the City. It is expected that
developer extensions of District No. 90's water mains will be required to provide
service for fire protection and domestic use within the annexation area. The
proposed area will not generate need for additional City employees because it is
within Water District No. 90.
Wastewater Utilitv. The area is within the Renton wastewater service area. Sewer
main extensions will be required to serve the area if properties develop and it is
anticipated that new construction would bear the costs of extending the sewer lines.
The annexation does not present any problems for the utility and it represents a
logical extension of their services.
Parks. The Community Services department indicated that the annexation
represents a logical extension of the services provided by their department. Staff
noted that the area is currently underserved with Renton parks and recreation.
However, there are three King County parks within approximately% mile of the
area. If new parks were to be developed in the future to serve the area, additional
staffing and programming would be necessary.
Police. The Police Department did not indicate any concerns regarding this
proposed annexation. Staff noted that no new staff would be required to serve the
area and that the annexation does not present any problems for the department.
Staff indicated that the area represents a logical extension of their services.
Proposed Tess Annexation 10%Noti�Intent �
Page 3 of 5
Fire. Renton Fire and Emergency Services currently provides fire and emergency
services to the area under a contract with District#25. Staff did not indicate any
concerns regarding this proposed annexation.
Surface Water. The area is located in two drainage basins, the May Creek and Cedar
River basins. Future development will be required to comply with the City's Surface
Water Design Manual and the Flow Control Duration Matching Forested Site
Conditions should be applied, as well. The area contains no surface water
infrastructure, but conveys runoff via a ditch and culverts, or via sheet flow. The City
would assume maintenance responsibility for the ditches, culverts, etc. Any future
development within the area would require additional public storm system
construction and would require additional resources for maintenance of such
infrastructure. Staff indicates the annexation is a logical extension of their services.
Transportation Svstems. The Transportation Systems staff has no concerns
regarding the proposed annexation. Staff indicated that additional Transportation
Systems staff would not be required and that the annexation represents a logical
extension of services. Southeast 132"d Street and Southeast 134th Street do not
meet the current Renton street standards. A portion of Southeast 132"d and all of
Southeast 134th do not have adequate right-of-way width to construct a street that
would meet current Renton street standards. 162"d Avenue Southeast and 164tn
Avenue Southeast are not currently improved as streets, but are used as access
streets for abutting properties.These streets do have adequate right-of-way width
to meet City standards. Staff noted that the streets do not include curb, gutter,
sidewalks, and there is only one streetlight. Energy costs associated with existing
and new street lighting, existing and new traffic control signage, and pavement
markings should not be a financial burden. Staff indicated that the City would
assume ownership and responsibility of all existing streets in the area.
Public Works Maintenance. The annexation does not present any problems for the
Department and it represents a logical extension of their services._Staff noted that
the City would assume ownership and maintenance responsibility of the streets and
storm water infrastructure that is located within the area.
Buildin�.The Building section did not indicate any concerns regarding the proposed
annexation. The annexation does not present any increased need for City staff.
Plannin�.The Planning section did not indicate any concerns regarding the proposed
annexation and stated that the annexation represents a logical extension of their
services.The annexation does not present any increased need for City staff.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION:
Proposed Tess Annexation 10%Noti�,�,,,Intent �
Page 4 of 5
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
Renton's Comprehensive Plan annexation policies support this proposed annexation.
The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area, is subject to development
pressure that might benefit from City Development Standards, and is land that is
available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and
subdivision regulations (Policy LU-38). Additionally, as Policy LU-36 states, the City
recognizes "that it has an inherent interest in future land use decisions affecting its
Potential Annexation Area".
2. Consistency with the Boundarv Review Board Obiectives:
(from RCW 36.93.180)
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communifies;
The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community.
b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water,
highways, and land contours;
The subject site is bounded on its western portion by existing City limits and uses
streets or parcel lines for the other boundaries.
c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
Water and sewer service boundaries will not change as a result of this
annexation.The Tess Annexation Area is in the Issaquah School District. The
school district boundaries will not change, the area will remain in the Issaquah
School District. Renton will take over police service for the 16.3-acres upon
annexation; the King County Sheriff's Department currently provides police
protection to the area. Renton Fire and Emergency Services currently provide
service under contract to Fire District#25 which serves the area. Pursuant to
state law, there will be no change in the garbage service provider for at least
seven years.
d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
This annexation does not have irregular boundaries.
e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated
urban areas;
Not applicable. No incorporations are proposed in this area.
f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
Not applicable.There are no inactive special purpose districts here.
g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries;
Not applicable.
h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of
unincorporated areas which are urban in character;
Proposed Tess Annexation 10%Noti�.Intent ,�,,.
Page 5 of 5
King County has designated this area for urban development because of its
location within the Urban Growth Boundary. The County has also indicated that
it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated
urban areas by turning them over to cities as quickly as possible. Because the
subject annexation site is within Renton's PAA and not in an area under
consideration for incorporation, annexation is appropriate at this time.
i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation are rural or designated
for long term productive agricultural use in the King County or Renton
Comprehensive Plans.
3. A fiscal analysis for the proposed annexation is attached.The fiscal impact analysis that
is used for annexations considers costs on a per capita basis. The fiscal analysis indicates
that the proposed annexation would have an initial net negative fiscal impact of$4,336
per year. A significant contributing factor to the negative fiscal impact is the amount of
roadway this proposed annexation includes. Approximately 2,400 lineal feet of roadway
is estimated to cost approximately$5,400/year to maintain. This proposed annexation
takes in roadways that if not included would significantly diminish the negative fiscal
impact. However, it is in the City's best interest, and is the preference of the roads
division, to assume maintenance of county roadways. Over a 10-year buildout period, it
is estimated that the fiscal impact would become positive at $12,499 per year.
CONCIUSION:
The proposed Tess Annexation is consistent with relevant County and City annexation policies,
as well as most Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. The proposed Annexation is
consistent with relevant County and City annexation policies, as well as applicable Boundary
Review Board objectives for annexation. The staff that reviewed the proposed annexation for
each department did not identify any major impediments to the provision of City services to the
area or indicate that they feel the annexation is untimely.
TESS ANNEXATION FISCAL IMPACT ANALYS��,,. .,,,,�„�
Units Population AV
Existing dev. 7 16 $2,509,000
Full dev. 47 108 $23,500,000
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/new SF household
$333,286 AV/existing unit(actual)
$500,000 AV/new SF home
Revenues Totalrevenues
Existing Full Rate Existing $10,203.7�
Regular levy $7,235.96 $67,774.00 2.884 Full $88,i16.51
Excess levy $156.86 $1,469.22 0.06252
State Shared Revenues
Rate(per cap) Existing Full
Liquor tax $3.23 $51.97 $348.91
Liquor Board profits $7.31 $117.74 $790.53
Gas tax-unrestricted $14.14 $227.65 $1,528.53
MVET $0.19 $2.99 $20.05
Camper excise $0.75 $12.08 $81.08
Criminal justice $0.73 $11.79 $79.15
Total $424.21 $2,848.24
Miscellaneous Revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise* $75.35 $1,213.11 $8,145.18
Utility tax** $133.20 $932.40 $6,260.40
Fines&forfeits* $14.98 $241.20 $1,619.46
Total $2,386.71 $16,025.05
* Per capita
** Per housing unit-based on$2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
Costs Total ongoing costs
Per capita Existing Full Existing $14,�3�.91
Contracted Services Full $75,516,98
Alcohol $0.19 $3.06 $20.54
Public Defender $4.68 $75.35 $505.91
Jail $8.56 $137.82 $925.34
Subtotal $216.22 $1,451.78
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $1,077.41 $7,234.05
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $239.89 $1,610.69
Police $276.89 $4,457.93 $29,931.81
Road maintenance** N/A $5,412.21 $6,013.64
Fire*** $1.25 $3,136.25 $29,375.00
Total $14,539.91 $75,616.98
* See Sheet Parks FIA
** See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation(FD#25 contract)
Net fiscal impact
Existing -$4,336.1$
Full $12,499.53
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
�r.r° �.rr+,
PARKS ACQUISTION AND MAINTENANCE COST CALCULATION SHEET
TESS ANNEXATION
Needs:
Maintenance of neighborhood&community parks
Assumptions:
$6,000 per acre to maintain neighborhood parks
$7,000 per acre to maintain community parks
1.2 acres/1,000 for neighborhood park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Pian)
1.1 acres/1,000 for community park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan)
108 Population after 10 years(projected growth)
Per capita annual costs:
Ongoing costs : (1 * 1.2/1,000*$6,000)+(1 * 1.1/1,000*$7,000)_ $14.90
(park maintenance)
Ongoing costs Maintenance Cost: $1,610.69
r�rr �rrr�`
ROADS MAINTENANCE CALCULATION SHEET
TESS ANNEXATION
New Roadway:
Zone Acres Linear Feet
R-4 1.74 269.7 (assumes 155 linear ft/ac)
R-8 0 (assumes 145 linear ft/ac)
R-10 0 (assumes 140 linear ft/ac)
269.7 Estimated total linear feet of new roadway
0.05 Estimated total linear miles of new roadway
Existing Roadway:
Zone Acres Linear Feet
n/a 2,427 Linear feet of existing roadway
0.46 Linear miles of existing roadway
Total Roadway:
Zone Acres Linear Feet
2,697 Estimated linear feet of roadway at full development
0.51 Estimated linear miles of roadway at full development
Estimated Costs:
(Assumes year/y cost of$2.23/linear foot to maintain roadways)
Annual cost for existing roadways: $5,412.21
Annual roadway maintenance cost at full development: $6,013.64
Revised 8-29-03 per Finance Memo
s� �
w '�o �
� � Q
¢ SE 131st St �S' N �
� F731st PI �
�
�
� SE 131 st Ln
�.. ■ .. ■ �..�.. ' �' f3Z1'R! �t.. ' .. ■ ..■.. ■
� Private Rd
�
� �
n ' �
■
� � � � � "� ' � "" '� PrivateRd
SE 133rd PI '
�
■
i
c�i� '�' '���t' '�' ' 1 SE 134th St
�
¢' SE 134th PI LL, �
� � �
� � � '
� Q SE 135th St
�
�
0
� ��
,_�. --
,
0 330 �� � -�, Tess Annexation
� Feet j �
1:3,000 � �•,�-•�-
j N _ J. � Vicinity Map
� C o m m uni t y & Economic Development s M�'
t � " —•—
Alex Pietsch,Administrator `�� �3 •-��� � City Limits �..._!Tess Annexa tion Boun dary
� �driann A.Johnson,PlanningTech II __ �\ �,til,,.__� S
t 4_-�
� � ",,s'"City of '�..� ',� 't �
i . -. ,_._ ,� 1_� s � . t � f - +♦ ._- � �--�5 i
December 17,2010
; -------------- —--------___.__—____..._....
�, - - —_..... --...___- _ -------____._ ..
-- - —-----
w
SE 131st St �
Q SE 13 st
-a
�
N
�
�
€ , d S_------- ;-------------��
-- -------------
i _ '_"_"J '_'_r'__"_'L"_"_'_
� I
' �
SE 132nd PI ______! i
i i
i �
i
i ,
,
i
,
� -- -_------- i
,
; i -----------------------------------------�
� � rivat
r j i
i i
,
i i
i !
i !�
' i
,
;----------------- �
w w
cn —
SE Q � �
� � �o c
c�
�
SE 135th St
File Name::\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations'� December 17,20��
tess_annex\mxdsV1_tess_annex_viclnity.mxd
° �a�s s�F�� ��'�;��-��� ��: � ���� � Tess Annexation
,:s.zoo ,_:';�, . ,.
N �\� ���� Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development �-- '�
Alex I'ietsch,Administrator "zr" rr-� __
�driannA.Johnson,PlnnningTechll v�� �L�.l ��;City Limits i__�Tess Annexation Boundary
� ��"''°`� =, �� �' � Parcels Tess Annexation Parcels
�: r � � 'V. �'
- �r �,f�l ��l „ �, �_�01 �-
�
. . -
� ., . :a � ` _. ' . . � . µ + , ��,..,. - M .1'^., . •,` .� ,� �,,,�, ,
_ .
� � , * ,,�+IC_, ,,n;� a� �r{� � � '# , � �i` �� ;��.
M^ i, � //� �!l f ��
. , ,
��.,� '�-�,r-��it�w c�'."x��„�e" '' '.' � '' � ��+ . �°� ��r�,.r���r.l � . �' "' �t`L' ---•� •�r�- "�. � ��. �A��� �:' .
e ' «
�
- - - - -� �- - - -
..� ---- _
� '' � ,,. 1 y► ,,�,�P'� .
A.' t��' .'�,� � � �:' ��. Y s . ,������ '.�... � _..5•� r' V�,���• • .������i� �", ���� � RR
"� �:.�/r�"�ir `� .�. �.' �..•hir" ;.arir.r.--�':-�� � S���.:�.�. >'�w, nw.� . 4:..k�. �"�I� q.t � �Q�r..,
� � � r* � ��
�! �r• �-���: �►� .q; ���, a, �,- �� raQ�.'�..::. � �_, S'��13 �. � �
. _
. ,
���,� I �� y . _ � ' �.,=t _ � i�,,�►. . s� ��,;� �..
., _ . �
:Pr vafe�.f2.d.:_.l:_` , . ,. � � � :._
� �... �j,
�a�,,�,. � '
;�.�� _ . ;
,..:�,�,- � _ • �'� ,�. ���, ..._ ��..f '� �:� �� d .' � �, �`�!"► �' w�..,.s.�� .
_ 4
- � �"
�
v , � - .� 131.s�`C - - :� .��� �- �° . � ::�'��- .
� � - �� �p
. �.._,�... -� ., �z r, � ,� � �� i . �1��. . ; ' :�+�f�i������h�i� .
,• .. � �.�� . .qi A . �... , 1 r , � . �.�. � k" -- �1.1 �
.�.1 =__��, � _,,, ��....� 1 �� , � 4= � , .,� •�,�� �,,c�.'� .. �_ ��
� " � � �
• -- - _..> _
�i � ��+� � _c ., �' – � F t ,.:l�-- ,� � �r�t.�".�i3�f !�.� � f:� �`. �,, �
���� 6 . �. �'^ � z=� �� �i �' �� �'i G.�
. . �� A . .� �'� ��
��� . ��'"- � !� � � �f�� � t�� �9 ��' 3 - 1����� d�`��► — � �,' �
. �'a
��."�,__{H � �..:r:i...� �:'�� 1 s�2��r�r.._._.. _._.... �:ai` ...lw.... �� � ' '�•" ,+ � .
.. : _
,
c.;— ". , - ,�- � � ; r,.
y.�
J " __
.
. '
.
�� , �,-.� � � � �
� T� r S , � , .
� ' - ' ;� r� . , t ��Cld� ►,,
. �
' ����,��� �. '� qfi � I . � (e R� �. ���
� �,, r ,� �f � �rt
,
+t� ':t` q . , " .e �r:.�,►',� , = i .. , . ;. .�.,�.- �: �,-`� .r�4�.
�.SE 1 — �'_'_'_ � .� i, , � r �-
32nd PI - '' „ • � , - r
�
� .- � .____..� �,�� . `� y �.
. . . ,� .
. _ .
� .. . _:_ _ ,
r �• N,, ,,�J ' •, ,
,.r• �
1 �-.yl •�► w•.� . �.. �� j� � . � �} y�,,.
7 � �� �I�' � � . .�(��' . F' ����„ ",i� � � a. . �t.ba'!:r ,4,�w. �„� � tY"
�:,�. � ' . �'�
+��.,:^ .� .. . � • , � ' . � ,N � �*„_.. .. � �� . �t i�f' . � �`'+
:�`'f�„-Y�"}��► . . �Y�'!�. . �� �� . ���, h� � ('. �1 #�iy�`. � a "Y
i d '+1' � ' . � �`r. •g
.ry�� V.; _ �
�� j �. __w..,.,_ � „F ;r'
t�� �� �1� 1 �jl�:'f� _ . �: - �. _ � :�
.
., �
� �
. . . ,. ,� � . .
; ,. .. , .,. ��� ,�;, ,
,
.
.:i ;. �•. �� e : '+� . � . �
�
...t ,..
rs
;�
,.. � .
S E d'P I ,f,� �' . �., �s.� �y�, ,�E�
� = 133r , . ., � . , �, .� . Pr. ,�►�,f. ,
L �• � ��• • � . ` +. i�
� - a�
�
�F��"!' ' 11 I�I�+��•I ��J���� � �;.�� �..sPr�' ...� +: ; � `. �.� _� , ��� .:;.#.� o ..i.�FM, `rt�"' .
� �� w 4
,
/�wJ.���r,,.., � '�+ywy�; t f f , � � �� '-.
-
yr��� —� 9'{ _i�..,,,, •�1,�'..,� � �; . �i.� �'� ! � � . `���` '�:-� _ � E•
, � �. ,
..
.
� �► �t.,�'
. .
,
� y,.
,'�".�""".�..:;� _ f�-�.=-� � �� �' '� I'� � � ` �,�1�,�,� '�'
�t � ���•'-'� � �:; i
�--�;,.w� � �' � ����^ 34th ��;' ��- '' _ ` -_ '�, �
�
SE 1 St ��
a . . ..r , ,•. � .� ,�"
� � f "�' , � �,t �F� � .,. ,i-� j' a
��j ` � ,. -= � � :,t��„+� .�"' �: "� � � r ' �� � ��»
.,
��= � a ,n l� � � a -_ tif y sC , 1 � � � �.
, T� 1��"�„�1��.� , cC r �`':� ��. ��;.Ir + ;Rr P- �..�if:; ` +`���^.� �-. ����' "r�-��f � p�
'r�7L
. � �
.
.
�A. -
F ��.--� r � �34th PI �� >.�r) � �, _.-��,i;� �„� ix, � (� ,�,,_ ��,', �,,��: __ �_ ,� y r'"
:. ,��.: � � �
� ,�. � �
�;��, , ,. . r.,—�r � � ,� ..�,,, �.���.�,=.�;, ��,� N Q _��,�� _ , ,���;..� ,�� ��� - � � :� .� �s�.;�:.���,
" r--tirr ����': . ,R � � , � ���� '4 y � , � d� +.,,`'� `.� �'�
. _
.
II �"1� �r
�.
• � f�:.� *4 ... r 3k !"w', co- . , ' ' �'• �� ; ��
/'.t �...��I :� . ' �� . . � l - ���. �� � r .1� � .�y r���r . 1�� r Mk � ��•
� : '
,_ � .
'-� `�� , �i;' ;��,. `. � . .�SE �.,� h-�,►��,�,�i -.��,.,,. �'�=�'� � � _.�,,,w��,� ..�,.�
. . ��
_._ _
(lle tl.�me�..AC6DWIannuiy.Gl I'� E�iu� �,ann��xa.���ns\ �811U8f�/ �4, 20�� ///���
tes�s annex\mxds�2 tess aerlalmr.d ���� ����������
300 600 ,.�� ,�,,,��� � ��
-
1:3,200 Feet ��� >„a /"�G I ��I
N � ���
f
Community & Economic Development .,�� �'� 0 Tess Annexation Boundary
N�x Pic.x_It.AJuu��st�a.�k r�S �,r�
AdriaiiaA.Jdmson,PlanningTerhf! _�_"�^ ,V� �_-L�� �,�,;City Limits
Ciryof
f ��L
� �;f� . t",��,. .�I � \ t__, t' �� Parcels
-„� � ..:/.� ��' ,� �_!�-� �� ..
�
R
R
R-1
R-4
R-4
R-4 R
R-4
File Name::\CEDWI2nniny\GIS\GIS_projects�annexations\
tess_annex�mxds�3_tess_renton_zoninb.mxd January 14, 2011 Tess An nexation
0 300 600
Feet „r� ��, - Renton Zoning
,:s,2oo � �, o,. .
N f ,�..
Community & Economic Development � �� ���'` �Tess Annexation Boundary
� �
NcsPias_1�AJuuwsua.a �`y +i� �� ��.�City Limits
Adriwa.l.Jdv�son,Planu:ng Tzch[I `�% �r.r�
��or, -,�, . ,�� ,,�4 Renton Zoning
— �� ��'('1 f f�!t'� (��'��; t--. `` 4i � Residential - 1 D U/AC
� ~ J � � � _fo� i��t.•1 0 Residential - 4 DU/AC
w
� SE 131 st PI
Q
-E— �-s#� �
N
CO
�
�E—� ti _ -4
� Gua#�-R�------._�
SE 132nd PI
�
R-4
, R
rd R-4 rivate-Rd
SE�4�th-St
1 - cwn LL' �
�
Q � � rn �
Q � m
� � Q
o � D
� SE 135th St �
�
m
R R
FileName::\CED�Planning\GISIGIS�rojects\annexationsl �anua 14,20��
tess_annex\mxdsW_less_KC_zoning.mxd ry Tess Annexation
0 290 580
Feet � °' � ��
1:3,200 N °����� .,,.,q,:. KC Zon ing
` ?`�'��
Community � Economic De�elopment :�.� � 0 Tess An nexation Boundary
iUcc Pic.y_L.Aduiuyatia.�n �
ldriana.l.Jolutiwn,Plann:ng Tech If �� X��%x �r:-� ��,;City Limits
''
r c►�,or, , "4� ,'��� King County Zoning .
�
---_____.�---""'" F :ti'��r�,�r����r� �� ,,, . ;--. �t ���
� R-4 Residential 4du/acre
� r--� , .�
._.__� �`;
w
� SE 13 st F�I
Q
-E-1�-1-st-L- �
�
N
�
�
- -.�-32 t:l� t
� �ua.t��d��
�
SE 132nd PI '— �
� esi entia Low ensity
1 r r`ivat�-
��'P3��tfr�t
x e � � �
°' a> a� �
>
Q Q �'' m
� I Q �
� I SE 135th St � � m
�
m
File�Jani� ACGD`,Planning\GI C,IS proj c[s\annexations� //��
tess_annexlmxdsU_tess_rentun complan mxd JahUary �4, 2��� ���� ����������
0 290 580
' Renton Comprehensive Plan
Peet � � -� �
1:3,200 � „�����..,�,�,
Community & Economic Development �''�yr� ��` Land Use Designation
N�s Pic.xsli.AJ�iuiLatia.w ,2 iP ��
.,ar��,u�.�.,�,��,,PlanuiapTech❑ � r � ��.,.� �Tess Annexation Boundary
��„��,,,,..•�t" u�of \ .:,�; •---
� �- , ;���-, I._.;City Limits
` �� �'���'�~�'`���� �`��"' �--� t' �� Land Use Designation
Y � � `"j°1 ,� RLD-Residential Low Density
w
� SE 131 st�I
a'
s�L- �
�
N
�
�
C�
GVt�tP��,,,_�
Q
SE 132nd PI '—
�
1 rd
riwate-R
um
��r�-tn s
� w �
�, � �
Q ' � �
Q Q
� � �
� I SE 135th St � � m
�
m
File Name::\CED�Planning\GIS\GIS�rojects\annexations\ Janua 14,2011
tess_annex\mxds�6. tess_KC_complan.mxd ry Tess Annexation
0 290 580
Feet ��#a,� KC Comp Plan
1:3,200 � a�d.,. � a,.,
�\ �� '�+���\
Community &Economic De�elopment `y , �Tess Annexation Boundary
lUl'S Pl�.%��IL A1I1111WS11ll�.1H' fP �
Adriana.�.Jdmson,Planuin�Tech[I �" �`+� ��,;City Li m its
�
,,,,,,,..,vY' t� ,�c'�°r � � ,`,� ��� �����., King County Land Use
----�--�- r �:��f i�C�.f���f�1 � "�'r�
_�,_ _ ��. <� �. .�L--. �' ,�
�' t 1._� �-,`,� um Urban Residential Medium 4-12du/acre
-- a
��� �
lJ.�
� '�\ �� W - �
�'� , � Q
w SE 1 s ,'St �� a �
/�
� � E 131 st P I `�'
� —Pri�cate � - —
}, �E-131 st-� � �
°° ,, I
� ,_�i
� �
SE-13 �
- — —P-r'uate-Rd
� �SE 132nd PI �—�—' �
�-I /
--� �
S 1-33r 5'�- ` Private-Rd —_
>
�
,
�
�
w - � _ ;
�, �th-St .
� SE 134th St
¢
� 13�_t _P_ cwi�� c"'n �
�
�
a�
� ¢'! Q' . �
L �p � '
p _J
� � SE 135th St -�— '—'— —'
---� �
FileName�.�.\CED�Planning\GIS\GIS�rojects\annex2tions\ �anua 14, 2011 Tess Annexation
tess annex\mxds�_tess_slopes mxd �
0 330 �0 I SIDpeS
Feet
1:3,600 N "��;�'� a.,.. CJ Tess Annexation Boundary
ti-, � "�',�� r=�City Limits
Community & Economic Development �y�� ��
Ncs Pir.Y_L.AJ:wi�in4a.a ,iT , Slope
A1I71<1ll21.h.JUIlR5017�Planu:ng Tzch 1[ �tX''^' ,��� Percent Range
�..7'°'"`cuvof .} ;�-�; ;1 ��,t,�a�s,,._,� 0>15% & <=25%
�'
� ,
._ � . r�- � C C ���rl �L�! i__. �� ri, �>25% & <=40%
� � .._. L_!Q1 �-+,� �>40% & <=90%
�>90%
�
Denis Law 5�, —"� Cl� Of -�+✓ �z
Mayor :__ __ - - � :- -r. _ _ �� ���,
• �' �'- "= -
,R' �.
_ , �� � `� ♦ ���} ♦
: �� ��� ✓rJ �`/
�-sA1�1�5.�` �l1111� ' 'a����� '�`r
Department of Community and Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administrator
December 17, 2011
Mr. Iris Hoffner, Director
Accounting Division
King County Department of Assessments
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 709A
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF 10% NOTICE OF INTENT PETITION TO ANNEX - PROPOSED
TESS ANNEXATION
Dear Ms. Hoffner:
Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise
one 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Petition. The request to annex to the City of
Renton, a code city, is made under 35A.14.120 RCW. The Petition is transmitted to you for
certification of sufficiency of assessed value under the applicable sections of the RCW.
Signatures representing at least 10%of the area's assessed value are required for this petition to
be considered sufficient in this regard.
A list displaying property identification numbers, owners names, and assessed values for this
annexation has been transmitted to Hazel Gantz. If you have any questions or require additional
materials, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 430-6576. Thank you in advance for your
prompt attention to this request.
Sincerely, ,
f -
c�,,-r� :�,� ,
Angie Mathias
Associate Planner
Enc.
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
�
a � ��rr+
ti� p� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
+ :: � ♦ DEVELOPMENT
� FZEC�M\!�D
��N�p'� M E M O R A N D U M ��� 2 � 2010
e., ..'�� ���°���
DATE: December 20, 2010
TO: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police
Mark Peterson, Fire Chief
Iwen Wang, Finance & IS Administrator
Nancy Carlson, HR & Risk Management Administrator
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Marty Wine, Assistant CAO
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator �
STAFF CONTACT: . Angie Mathias, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Annexation Review Form
An annexation review form for the proposed Tess Annexation has been circulated to City
Departments for completion. We have requested that the forms be returned by January 7,
2011. For your information, sample blank review forms and a map of the area is attached.
These are the same forms that have been routed to the various departments for review. The
table below indicates by section the staff person who has been sent the review form. We
appreciate your assistance in providing the information that contributes to adequate
annexation review. If you would prefer that additional or alternative representatives in your
departments receive this in a future annexation routing please let Angie Mathias know.
Community Services
Parks: Leslie Betlach
Public Works
Water Utility: Abdoul Gafour
Surface Water Utility: Ron Straka
Wastewater Utility: Dave Christensen
Transportation: Bob Mahn
P�ablic Works Maintenance: Bill Wressell
Community& Economic Development
Building: Larry Meckling
Current Planning: Jennifer Henning
Police
Police: Terri Vickers, Cyndie Parks
Fire& Emergency Services
Fire: Bill Flora
cc: Chip Vincent
+
� �
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBIECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134th Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: lanuarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: /VI��� v�/,✓►P _ �C�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
!
Tess Annexation
� � �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
1Vh
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
��
4. What additfonal facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
1��,,� �.��� ��c�+- � a���� "� .
�r��- a�v�we�Ca,he,r; +
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
anotherjurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
N�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
�� G�,�'C�(,��'c�'�,c�s_ tn►(,�,f �'s �-I'�.a_ r I��-el-�f- �F
�)
�-��e C`en�PC.�,v�-�s � G�v�P�1C '
General recommendation and comments: �
! '��+^�s ���
Signatur : Date: � �"(�2�2 G IO
Page 2 of 2
I
i. ' � � � �� I �' �`-'-, _ ��� __ ,� (
I . , � �I � �
I , , I ` � �. 7� -�_ '
i , _ _._ .
_.—_..__ ._ � I..._._ _ �� Q , � i
Cn _ i , ---_.
; -------- --I ' � , I ; � ! ', �
W �
� ' � j � --, N � ', �
' ,> � --�_ � � � �-- ���
� --- � ____��----- � , �,SE 13,1st,St �_. �, � �-__ � � �,�� � ; .. � _ __ , � ;
Q � � �
�' '' I , � i __i...I�___�_ �� �I i I_. - ,31sf PI ' 'I _____.__ �, `�I ��
,
� __ __ , SE 131st Ln i , ' I i �
I _ , _ ____._ . __.
; � � _ __.
;
� _ ___.._.___ ' ` i f � � _ � � _ _ _ �
�
� ___.__ ,
, -._ � ,
�
; i I �, � �, ; � � � � � - �,
� � � '
i � f �� ; i � I � '
� I !
� —__ ___ __ � ��� ���i� � � t ■ � ■ ��� ■ ' I
i
� _ i _ _ i
I
; � � ' I � � � i Private Rd ____
S' , � � '�� � --
---_____ � , ,
' � i l � , �
i f � � �
�� i n ; � �
, , , i � �
'I i I ' il ; � i , _ ..._._
�
� i ■ I
_ � � � �
� i � � _.
� � � , '�� :■ ■ � ■ � ■-� ' �(' ... ■ rivate Rd
� � � I i �
, __ j -. __'_ ;
SE 133rd PI ' '
� ' I I I � � ' � � ' �
' ' � {
i � , , �
' -- --- ,
� � � � ;
i
il i � �I �
I �_ � ,___.� i (--------_,
, r , --� �,
; _� ,-, � � __ __------._ ' ' �.
� � - 1 _l '
- __ --_� L___i i � _
__ '
�� qq^ } t , r ; I
_--_._..__ . �`�`�'�`� I 1' !
I�� i ,' j 'I �---_ _
, � i � ■ 1 _ � i �� __-------�____�
wl
; ; ,
, , I '
! � / ' l I
,
__
�_ � , (_ w-�. � � � _. _� � i , �
r
th St
Q� � SE11�4hPI u,
� _ � ��.
___ _ �
__, ,�_, �-_- � �
� ' ; ; - , ' ,
�t _
� � ( � _ � _ � � � _ _ � � �
��I f � � ._ , � r � ; � �- ___��_ i �
' � ( � i
_._� _ _ _ � ' I � � i � � � � ' �
_ _ �� � � ' Q �__.._�_ I--.._ � ,�___
� � SE 135th St ; ___..
� ' - ' �
; �� ��,; _ _ � ' _ . --- -
� , s. __ E.__ � � _ ; �� _-- � i -
a �� � ( ' - �
� _
, . � ��
�.
_ ,--_ ._ ,
� � .__. � ;
:� - - i � �- �
! Jr _ � �. i ; 1 ; � I
,; , _ '
� � I ! I � �
File Name��.\CED1PIanning\GISIGIS_projects\annexations\ .
tess_annex\rnxd s11_tess_annex_viciniry.mxd
o 33o ss� � � ���;;� ,�������� Tess Annexation
Fea� � .,.
, ;
,3,000 � � C �;�
N `\� � "-'`�� Vicinity Map
, ' ._1' �
Community&Economic Developrnent y �
AlexYietsch,Administr�tor ��`�i��i �;�� � City Limits �._!Tess Annexation Boundary
Adrinnn A.Johnson,Plannin Tech II ..�.S,� t���,`
�
eCity of � �1^ 1a
�'r;� I ��E'.��'�C� '��•� '.., ' � -� -
� . � ��:
December 17 2010
a. '
�
,�,, ,�`
ti�Y � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
O
� :: ,s � DEVELOPMENT
�
��N�p� M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 20, 2010
T0: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police
Mark Peterson, Fire Chief
Iwen Wang, Finance & IS Administrator
Nancy Carlson, HR & Risk Management Administrator
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Marty Wine, Assistant CAO
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator �
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Associate Planner
SUBIECT: Annexation Review Form
An annexation review form for the proposed Tess Annexation has been circulated to City
Departments for completion. We have requested that the forms be returned by January 7,
2011. For your information, sample blank review forms and a map of the area is attached.
These are the same forms that have been routed to the various departments for review. The
table below indicates by section the staff person who has been sent the review form. We
appreciate your assistance in providing the information that contributes to adequate
annexation review. If you would prefer that additional or alternative representatives in your
departments receive this in a future annexation routing please let Angie Mathias know.
Community Services
Parks: Leslie Betlach
Public Works
Water Utility: Abdoul Gafour
Surface Water Utility: Ron Straka
Wastewater Utility: Dave Christensen
Transportation: Bob Mahn
Public Works Maintenance: Bill Wressell
Community& Economic Development
Building: Larry Meckling
Current Planning: Jennifer Henning
Police
Police: Terri Vickers, Cyndie Parks
Fire & Emergency Services
Fire: Bill Flora
cc: Chip Vincent
�
, ''�' ,"�„y
Annexation Review Form
(Piease return compieted forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134th Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: lanuarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
r
• . Tess Annexation ,,�,,, �..r�
.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
General recommendation and comments: �
Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 2
sF � �
w � ; �y, i ��o �� � a�
cn _..._____. ' � ¢
a� �._____
� �.
N —__ � cL�'o
> �--,
Q _. 's `
� _,_,__�_.�-._..__� ._ SE 131st St -- � _ �,�, ..-
� � �� �- 31 st PI �
�- ____.�..__..
� ° �� � � _ _-- � , �
� SE 131 st Ln , '---�---j- , --� � �_�_.__ _�
�----� ---�-�—�-�-�-�-.�...
-_. ,
. �.� `
�-__..._._�______.�1
1__—,_ ..�.... _ �___� �� _ ! �■ ■ � ■ ��� ' SL�3� �t� ' � ■ ■�■
� � ■ ' Private Rd _�______�
n .� '
�
� , ;
� V � � �.____�
� �_
� � � ' '� ' � ' � ' �" ■� Private Rd
SE 133rd PI '
. �
� ;
��'._ � ��_._.:__ ' � ��..— � ,.
-�-�-_-- _ � i �!
w T .�.1���. � . 1 _ _ _. _ _
cn � - SE 134th St
a� a,
Q¢'o SE 134th PI � _. . �
� `� ;
� � � , �
CD
�— —— � Q
, �
SE 135th St -------� �
__ � o
� - � --1-----�-__�---�_„_ , �
- �
� �,
__ � � � :
__;
, r_.�__. _
-�.
I de Nan�ie ACEU1NIannma�GIS1GIS pre�eds�annexationsl
less :n�nex\inr 1 �1 tes:: aruiex vicinrtytnxd
0 330- ��ee, ,, .:�� ,,,.,,.� �� � Tess Annexation
,:a.000 �,.,�� , '"+�°-'`�t
N Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development �� - �
Alex Pietsch,Adminishator . 0 City Limits �._!Tess Annexation Boundary
AdnnnnA.Johnson.PlnnningTech II �
. . �� ��,,,����
F���.�..� �, `` �'., � r�--� � - •
C
��e December 17 2010
.
. '�✓ ,'��
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: January 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet (existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
, Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
�7 • � "
Reviewing Department/Division: �'`������`���'
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/d'ivision?
Tess Annexation �
�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
�,/C�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
��
�%,�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�:.r 1ltCr
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
�(�r� '
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
C��K.
General recommendation and comments: �
�
� T
y� 7 /��
Signature; ' r 1 ^.���•?F Date: l�`�.�L�/..��''
Page 2 of 2
i I � �
� , � , j
- - � ' �.. sF j . � '' �, ,
� �.,
; ' '� ' � i
cwi�'' .- - � ,,' j I i � . ; , . O� ',�1 , � ,
; ��
i. Q
j _
��� �i , ' ' i � I � ',
> N � �
' � � SE 131st St ' �' � � '
,Q . , - , i .. , i � � � � , ; � ,
o ' � 'I �I � ; ' ' , i �� i � j, 731st PI � � ;
- •— ' ' i SE 131st Ln' � ' ' ( , ' � I�
'� I y i , � i ;
I,- , � ; I � ' � i � , , � ii
�� � ; � � I i � � � i
� � ; � , �' , � r � � ■ ���,� �1�3'�}1fl� t� ■ � • �i �
, � j i , , �■ ■ ,Pnvate Rd '
i � � � � � T � � � � �� � i
! ' n � 'C i I ' � '; i
� �
'' ' � ', ' �
� I . �
� � �
- � i : • � I
L i � � i j � '
i � I � ; ; � i ; ' � ■ � ■ � ■-� ■ �,i-� ■ Prlvate Rd � - �'
■ I i � '
SE 133rd'PI � � � � '
I �
' � � i ! � � ' i ''� � i ! i
1 �- - �, i : '� � � , ( - _ _ j � i
, �
i '' � `', j � �, ; ' i
,
i 'w - ; � I ' � '
� ,.. 1_.i : � -- '+ 1- �
° �I
� ' ■�.1 fi��. , ! . _ �� - - ' �' �� '
�
� --- - - , , � � "'i■ ; ; i,_ , � ; - , ' S
, ; , � � E 134th Sf
a� ;� ; I E 1 � ; i ! � -
; �
;� � ; ,
' '134�h PI ' � -
� � �� � , - i �
¢� _ � SE W 1 �' ' � , I � � ' ; ,
� - N � ' , i �
, , ;
�� � � � � ' -... � , � i I
- - �I -� , - ,' � > '. ' � i � � I � I �
'
� � "� 'I I I � ! ; ;
; -- �'t. i . � _' � i� SE 135th St , �
i � , ,o � ,, � ,, , ` I
- ; --, ; ; � � -- � ; 4 � ; � � , �,
,i � � , y , � � � � �
�� ; _ ; ,, � , , , , l , ,
� , �i , ; � I I y I , � . ' I
File Name \CED1PIanning\GISIGIS_pro�ectsWnnexationsl
tess_annex\mxdsll_tess_annex_wcinity mxd
0 330 �� ,�� �<<<-�-,��.� ����� � Tess Annexation
Feet ' } �,.„ia.��.
13,D00 ' � ( �l.'
N '` �t '�-'�� Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development �z �"�� '�
Alex Pietsch,Administrutor
AdrinnaA.Jolmson,PlnnningTechfl �..�`�jY ;r::�,� � City Limits �._!Tess Annexation Boundary
�:;�-��
C� ctyof TT �1� , �,
____....._.,...�....�:r ���� � ��� `��'g'��'� `�„�, f 4 .
'' � i_,_.r�'� ��..
� �°• -`t'.' December 17 2010
i
a ,
`Vi �►'
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60%Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160ih Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: Januarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: �-� t �"1 ��"(�,-�-1���--
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
�
�� , �L-�'—���`� ��Ll �`�--�` ��-'j� ��%=—�=`-�!l�-�= �"�=.�_-� ,
t
, Y
Tess Annexation � �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area. � � ..�
� ;=%�=Gt,��' ��,��r� ,���-�C!��'-`r'L'.j,�� l��t�c,- �_-_�"-,'-�-- ��"_�'�r--1l�-�
�,,,,...r- �.
/c' s�"_�<=-��- ��,4— � �`��,�.f--7�-,�'� .��'�-��-C-�'��,'
3. Does this proposed a nexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division? .. �� 3 ;
�-�. -�- L't.�._j��d��,- � � �,�-%�..'c_:�"% ��'.��=�=k'-- �������
�--��-":�a-�� �.a_1 c�t���' ��"�/�.C�;�l��-� �r�-�,�r,r>�--� ft� 1,�,�- �-t��
�
�;��.���i�� ��� , ----, �----- �_
_�-�--_
�` -�,.� ��'-�tG,� (�-' ��"�1/.!�'�- y�.��.�/r=/�=C�
� ��- ��'�'�=�t
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to erve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
l �.��i�� c..1.��� �
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
an�ther jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
!— c� , �.��_
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
J�i ��l.j�� l l�—�%G� C�c._- '�(j�.Y�-��L ,,,,. • / --� `. .�.
- `� 1��" �-���c�-�-e��-� , �l�"'I�JC��;
�`��-��� `� ���y��:�-�--7 ���,�- C;�-�-���, � ,—� � .l�
/� , --�r�-�.l�- !��-�- l.-� �,���.���
�-�" ��c�7���L- ,
Gen ral recommendation and comments: �
c ��=C1�"j l C:�-� ���l t�����7�'�-�.
����������
Signature: � -� ��`�� �' Date: `�Lt ��,i
__._.�—'
Page 2 of 2
� i � : � '
- � - - - - i ; i ; �,.. �\._ s�, , �, ..,.. � �,
,W, i � '� �� I. �� 1 . ``. �� II N.
� , I i � � i � 'ti, I y I
) i .f ' Q
� { I, ' i i - I 't - � �
;> �i , i i C!� I -� I
Q _ �_ ; : ; SE131stSt ; F ' � ' � �
� ; ; ' � ; ; ; � �, � , � s 731st Pl j �, I
� � ' ` ; I � I
�n �, i �. I ( � � � i - l
; � – ' I ; ,
� SE 131 st Ln' � ' � � ; , � �
�' � � '� � ''� - , I � � � I � �� i
; I _ � S � ( � (
�, I j � , j ;
', i �'' , , r-� ■� ■ ��� � '�'1'3�11�1' t� • � �� i�i � i
' I , ,
; j ,� ' ; � � ■ ,Private Rd '
, _ } � � , �
� j ' � � � ' � , �j ' '
� � � � T �
, � n _� � � I
� i I I j � I
�, —
' '
i I i ' i �
_. � '� ' '�
, � I
, I I
�
, I I � , � !
, I I � ; �' ■ �-■ � ■-� ■ �i,�-� ■� Private Rd � �'
- � � � i �
SE 133rd PI � � !
, i , ;
I -- ; , � ' iI , ' �; i ° � I i I �
� , I l I !- � �- i � �- i ' � I - ! '; '
i � .� ';' I; , ' , ,. � ; ; i
- — , i � _ � _ , 1 � i � � I
-- , ,
w� � ' � �,i�t j �; i � j �
`
� _ ■ �■.,■ �■.r .
�
�I , ' �� ' � ; � � i `,�` � j I _ , ; - - - , a ' SE 134th St
i � � � Ii I �
Q - -- �' SE'134th PI ��w ; , ' ' ' I i ` � � � ' - I ,' i ' .
o! ', � � ',� ; �. y , `� I '� � , � �
�; � i � � � , � , �� � �, ! , i ;
t , - � ! � � � I ' � i
_. .�I - i ' ' i� SE 135th St � , � ; ; i ' � i
, � . :_ . � ,�. , , ,,
I
, . o '� �
-- , - � ,
, I
I I
� �
� � � � � ,
� . � , (
- � , ` � I , � , . i �
i ' - � I ' � �' � ! � ti
' ` ` '' f � 1 � � I ' '
: ; „
, �
� � � I �
Fde Name �\CED1PIanning\GISIGIS_projects\aMexations\
tess_annexlmxds\t_tess_annex_vicirnry.mxd
0 330 �� _ � � -�����f, ��������� Tess Annexation
Fee� ' , ���� � + ��.;�a,���.
13,000 � � ���,_,�
N � �, y�.,7 � Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administrutor N v'zc'""+ r'� t•�•
AArinnoA.tohnson,PlanningTechfl ,. ��,��., '*,:, 0 City Limits �._!Tess Annexation Boundary
ww.�� c;ryof. `,,-� " �� �;�,�=e„t
-.a.-,�,�°�"` ,r � ('I f C� C l ���`'' ; �r -% �4 �.'
...�..� . .�, z..�-�,
December 17 2010
.
- +
�
� �W �
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60%Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132"a
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134th Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: Januarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: Y ' ''�G�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
rd o
Tess Annexation ,� � `
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
�/o
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?c��
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation�e��
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
anotherjurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
�n j K-.,)a W..�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
�e 1�o�ve- ��,,. Po���
General recommendation and comments: �
Signature: � Date: ����/// o
�'. ��/1J���S i
Page 2 of 2
i I ' ', � i ; �� �. s I ! W � .-
� , � j ,I I ` � � I
- I �,
�' - .. �. , �I i , �' , ' �' ,`��r' ` ` i �"
�. � � � ' , _ � . � ;
,Q - l I , �'. � N � �
�' � SE 131 st St ; s'F i� � '
� ' � i ; ( i � yl I
--- � - 31 st PI _
�
� ' � I i I ; � ; ' - ' �
�r, ; ; i ' ; ; I ; � j ' ' �
� � , _ , � , ; ,
� � � SE 131st Ln � ; I , , +
�i _ � � " ' �, ' ' ! '�, i �
�
, I � � i I � � � � � ', i
� ( � ; j_ � i ,y.�, � � � � � I
'' ; � , � �' i ■ � ■ � ��ZRi]� t� ■ � ■ r�� ■ � �
( � i, � i i � j � , , � ;Private Rd ,
� � ,
; I � � � T � ; �
� � �. � , ,
n ; , ; � ,
, , .
� , � ; ' ; , -
;
, ; � � � ' � � � � ;
' I, i , � . , _ � , � I ,
I i i , ■ �-� � ■- �
� � � ; ; � � ' �.�■-� ■� ; Private Rd �� � , � . �
SE 133rd'PI ; ' , , '
i , ;' i I ' ` ' ' : !
� _ .._ i , � ; I , i ! i
' � � � _i ; � ' � ! � i �
� , ; ... ; , - - , , �
� '�' -- � - � , , I ' �
-- � �
� -- - — , ` ��' � i � � � % i
I , , t � ���■�i i■ 1 - � --i I
; I ; ( - t -- j � i ; � , �
�� � SE 134th St
w - , � , - , ,
�, -- '; � ■, I _ � I _. - i i ,
�>� i � ; � i a'� i � I � �
¢I _ _ -- ' - SE,134th PI �'LL, ' � - � _ _ � — � 1 ? -, � : ; ;
;� � , ; � � , ; ;
`ao ;cn � �. �y � ' I � '; . � ,
L!")I ' � �� ( � I i ��, � ; j � �L � � I 'I I I �' ,
- - --- �—,— , ,,' - ., _ . _ . _. .Q i , ; , � � ,
I , ' � , �
' ,. ; ' �� i� E 1 t St , �- ' �'-- ;
�_ _- S 35 h I � !
� i i i -.-. � � i ! { �
� -- - ' i � , _ - (�p I I� (
i � � (
i . � � , ', ! � � i � � � l � I
� ; I '� �
� � � - ' � � �' � - i , � �
I - I ( I � ` � '� � ' '� � � � �
J '
File Name :10ED1PIanning\GISIGIS�rojectslannexations\
tess_annex\mxdsli_tess_annex_vicirnty mxd
0 330 �o ; ����- ���� ������ � Tess Annexation
Feet _ �i „ J �,.,-�o.�,.
1:3�000 , +\.�. '` 1`tiC'„�
N a � Vicinity Map
�-� ;
Community&Economic Development 1�? ��� �,�
Alex Pietsch,Administrntor �c""
AdrinnnA.Jnhnson,PlnnningTechfl �..,,e�, �;_ C� City Limits �:=�TessAnnexation Boundary
�� :`._�;'';, f�j - �j�l���
r� � �:1�C � C I ",.:;: , � "�..__.r � .
�� � � n��� ° -.,'� December 17 2010
C
w � �
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134th Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: lanuarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
ReviewingDepartment/Division: �f�- a- L`.Mr��e..�•.. Sc�r✓,crs
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
f`+ro.� o.��.-w c f' ..a� �L..
�G;. i..�� C✓r r�,. f-l y s rr�u�t e f��s �rc� , h � C
� y+- �
(
1-��c �;sf. Z5.
�
Tess Annexation � � �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area? j�t �g�r.; I s Sct✓+�c� �r /�vW �': l��S � � !C. 7�r�c �S %--�.7�c r�
�', f� -F/� �a ��a ��� �
C�'r o � �l.c �.rrh .
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division? L v�✓C,-���/ Sr�vt .,��.�. c,r r , �rvr� !-�i<- S �, ��-� ��,
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�l,'e✓1 c .
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
anotherjurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
N�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.) �v�, s,,-,�<r �-
General recommendation and comments: �
�,
Signature: Date:
� Page 2 of 2
I
, �
� �
, ; II . i � , i �
_... . � _
, - ,._. _ . � ' � ' C/�
w ' - -� I ,� � �� ~`` .,� S�Ju'� . � a7 (�
� - � � , , � � ''� , d
a>. � i� I 'i , - N j �.t .. �
Q - ; i - i SE 131 st St - �S'F ' � i "� ' � �
�' I � ' � - ; ; � 131 st PI j �; �;
� ' i I � ' , ' ( � �, , , j 1
� 'i � � ; � ( � � � �
� - � SE 131st Ln ; �, � , i ! _ .
'' _ , j ' ' '
i � � j � �
� � : � . � ��
� � �■ � �■ i� � � I.
� 'i � �' , � -� � ■ ���;� ��3 t �
� � � ■
� Pr'
ivate
� � r f� Rd
1 1 ! ' '� , ', ' i �
i
� � ,
� � , �
�
� n � I � � T ! j
' - i i 1 '
, _ I
; i
I i 1 ! � �
{ I i ' i _ �� 'I i , �
' ! � � i � � � � � �"■ � ■-� ■ �i�-� � � �
; � , � Private Rd �� ,-- � - �_,
- SE 133rd PI ' � � � ;
I _ _ j � � i � i ', i I i � �,
! ' i
j ; j !.. I i. .l � � :� � ' I', - - - . . I � i �I
i i �._� � _ .. . _ '��. � - � � i . ' i i
� � ; � ° , i �
- - -- �
_. __
� � -- - , � �
� ' -
� ;
�w, � � � ; ����t■ - � - - 4
� ; ;
�i --- - - , � ; � , � "�t■ '�'�' - � j , � 1 - � - i �' SE13 thSt
� � I ', , �
, � �
�� - - �� SE'134th PI 'u., ' � !� ; � �- - � � , i �i , ' ,
; � �
� �� ' I '� ' !� ; I
�
�
�
� I ; - . '
L�[�i i ,� ' � : ' ' ' ! �CGD ` ' I � i
- -._ �—.-- .... .-�' ---�i- �-i-...- - i� � �� � I i . ' � � I i .
� ,, :. I ,Q . . � _ I I � ( i � i 'i
; _ ; ; _ � _ i� SE 135th St - ' ;
i I i .... � � , ,
o � i
- i " ! ;, � --- � i �, � ; i ;
�
; ; � � � , I ; 1 � , i I
� �, _ �
' � ; I I _ � � I , � � I �l
i � �. %� � ` I 1 ( I � � � V
File Name� \CEDIPIanrnnglGlS\GIS_pro�ectslannexahonsl
tess_annexlmxds\1_tess_annex_viciniry mxd
�� �� ' ������� Tess Annexation
0 330 Feet `\ ,.�t.,�'�,�+F� ��.,:<.�„
1:3�000 ; � �_�',� �� �ry{._-.�C
N � r� � Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development ��, �zy '�
Alex Piecsch,Administrator "`���4 � r'-'Tess Annexation Boundar`/
AdrinnuA.Johnsnn,PlanningTechll kW,�=U�� ���,` � City Limits �.�� 1
���,r� r Ci�r ..._....__i �i--� 41
_,..._.�,�..�.+�.�.:—�°�°�' C :.. ...�+_�:� t ��E :�r:, � �f„� L,.,�__( �, .
� 4� December 17 2010
� f
�✓ `�..r�
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132"a
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134th Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: January 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: � L`�16� /V.Q� n.
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
Iv �
i �
Tess Annexation � �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
N� . � �
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
� a OU`CS�1�1� W�i�h S13ti��c
6 Aa.�Q.
4. What additional faciliti s or staff w uld be req ired to se this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur s a result of his annexat on?
�
5. Would the City assum ownershi or responsi ility for faci ities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Woul new agre ments or fra chises be re uired as a result of this annexation?
�V �
J
6. Would alternate bound ries creat a more logic I annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the atta hed map.)
� �
General recommendation and comments: �
Signature: Date: Z� �I�� 2 d ��
Page 2 of 2
- - - I I '; \ �.. `. ~ s�`, � � ., Y � i _
L.L.� I '' �� I ' � �� � I
(A' _ I � � , � �\ I i >
¢ - I I �� � ' I I N I ' � � I
� � ` � SE 131 st St ( , `r 31 st PI '� � �
,-c , � c� !
' F� �,
� y , ` ! � I ,I � ' , ; . i
�, _ ( �, � I �� ` � ; ; (
, � SE 131st Ln � , ;
, I� � .
, � � j � 4 � �, j ;
i � i �
' i �
, ; �� ( I � � E ' I j ! i I
, ?. . ..�. :.�� ■ �e ��' t.. ■ .. ■ ..:.. . � i
, I { � � I � �;' , � Private Rd
� ! y i I � ; I � f ,�.
, f f � ,
i n .� ! � ', � ' i ' i
� , , i , ,
� j �; , j ; ,
_ � , , E . �
_. _ _ � _ a � � � � �: : �
I j � I , i - . � � � � ; i .
� � � � ■ r- � ■-'-■ � -
� ■ �
i ■-�
� . i Private � -- ,
SE 133rd'Pi ' � ', Rd ' � ;- -, ;
� i ; , , � �
� i � . � � �, I � i + '
i i` ' ' - -. . _ _ I
I ; � � _i I ' ■ i � i, � �
, --' _' ',' ,
' � , � �
,
; ,
� ; ., �� - I , �
� � I
, ,
� - i�` i � '
- — I �� ; '
'w' � ! ' ■aF.���t. �, ;' , � _ i j i
c„I, _. � ' � , , ■ .�'! \ I , -- i � ` SE 134th St
;N! ' i 4 � � ! � r i � � J, i � ,� �
;�' -- I� SE'134th PI. '�, i , � � �� _ % � _ ' � � , ; �. ;
o"�o� � � C� - i � i � � �' i ; �i !; � ; , '
f ,,
--- �� - , , — r � i � I ? j I i ' i i
� ! � I� I i ', i i I
, � 1 � � ' ` ! I
; ;_ ; ' i'� SE 135th St , - _ � :
�, , ; I � � ;� � 'I I '' ' ', I
� ! . � I . ' i , � � i
; � , `
� �.I ,
I -, � � ' ; i ; � 'i
�, , � , i i � � � , I i
� � i. i �� II iI � 1iI , ,
File Name 10ED\Planning\GISIGIS_projectslannexationsl
tess_annex\mxdsll_tess_annex_vicinrty mxd
0 330 �� _ � � ��r�, ���� � Tess Annexation
Feet = ii , � •,.<,�,�.
1:3,000 ' �` �'^-
N - '��-`�� Vicinity Map
� j�,> �
Community&Economic Development �-z •� �
Alexl'ietsch,Admini5trator `�c'�""+ ,-�""'`#�+ :"•�'
AdriannA.Johnsnn,PlanningTechll ��.��.��� ���:�,,.,,� C� City Limits �.._!TessAnnexation Boundary
_ � c;tyof, ,,� �� t#i.
I i F
C �Tr-�''�,i � �� �� �,.`..;.<'� � �f„��%_,_t--14 � t�
_ � e December 17 2010
�.
,
�...� .�.�'
Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160`h Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: January 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residentia) Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: G(/ ��` � "��
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
/ _ �S
r
Tess Annexation
�' � :
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
. �
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
�,
( �`1
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
/U UY�-e-
^�lt�`Y`-R-�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
anotherjurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
�-�� �� �<�
��, -��-� (� �.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
�a�
General recommendation and comments: �
Signature: Date:
� 3 � 1 �
�
Page 2 of 2
I � � ` l �. I � �
,, i , ; y _._
; s� ; . � i
,' �,t- - - ,- , � i i j , ``�� � ��o� ;�`�- �, t
'' � � ! l d
�' ! ' j 'i ; � �
,�� s I � �' i I
� , i , , ; �
Q ( SE 131st St F � ' �
,� ' � � �:
� i , � , �
( 31 st PI
�
� _
�I
i � , i i I � ; �I
� � � i ' i ' i ' ' ' � �, � �
; , i SE 131 st Ln�' ( ' ' ' I � , ,
� I ; , , ;
I i, I i ; ', '�
� i ! � i � � I i �
� � i � � ; ; �I
i � ■ � ■ ��! ■ ���� t� ■ r ■ �� � �
�' � I i 1 ;� i �� ,
1 � I ; � ; ■ � , � � ■ � Private Rd
� � �i i
� ' ' ,
, n �V i � i,, � � T " I
, a � �, , i ' - , �
_ � : ,� � � �
� � � � , � , � . I
- � , , , � _ � � , ; I
,
�
+ � ; � ` ' � ■ �-� � ■-� ■ �, - ■ t
, I i ; ; ' � � ; Priva e Rd � ; __ ;
■ �
SE 133rd Pl � �.
i _ ; ; , ;` ; ' ' � I �� � ,� � '
� `I \._ -- ; ;_ � � � � , � � '� , _ 1 I
� - - - ' f � '�,' . - � . .. _ ' ' , ! ` i i
� - ' - �. . � ' � �
; i i i ( — +�^}� � ' ' I
, - ,_. . . � _ ' � I
W. ��`�1r1�'t� �;■ �� - � i
_ � � I
cn� _. . . i ; ' i , ' � ` SE 134th St
` ' i \ I ,
_ 4
i � � � `, � , ! ;
' ; , rn
;Q�� — ' SE'134th PI LL, � ; '- ' ' _ � , ._ , � , ' ' _ II
�
;
� , , � ; ;
�:, cn _, � ; E � . v f ', � , ; j - . ', ;
L
- -- -- �I-- -� �� � ` i : - �--.> 'I! ! : j � � i � � �CD i I � � � ' � I i � �
� '' ; ;.._ + i= � SE 135th St �
� ; ' �� i �,
i � I � I � �o � � � , i , , { _
� ! j -, ;- , ' ; - � ' I I i � � �
� � I �
, � � � ; ,
' � , - ' { '' ' i
; i I � � � i ( , � �
� � � ��� 1 � 4i � I � � �
File Name� \CED1PIannmg\GIS\GIS_projects\annaxationsl
tess_annex\mxdsN_tess_annex_wciniry mxd
p 330 �o�, s� - �,�f� ,,..�o.,,:����� � Tess Annexation
13,000 ' � C '(;�,_,�
N `� ..;� � Vicinity Map
Community&Economic Development ��--, �;y `�
Alex Pietsch,Administrator �`r.�^'} r="'� r•�•
�drinnnA.7nhnson,PlanningTech II �,.��,�j w�ti.,;�� 0 City Limits �._!Tess Annexation Boundary
�`C� c��yof ;-, �i `�i
_........�...,.� � µ�C�'� C �C�� -;':,N.� ' �'f,.�� L j-__:!� �. .
� �• �� �.`' December 17 2010
� �
, �
`�rr �
Annexation Review Form
(Please return compieted forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60%Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132"d
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160`h Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20.2010 Comments Due: Januarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department ivision TRA�uSP��'fA�T/o�N Sy�EMS
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
No. However,SE 132"d Street and SE 134th Street within the proposed annexation area do not meet
current City of Renton development standards for streets,and a portion (approximately 345 feet in
length)of SE 132nd and all of SE 134th do not have adequate right-of-way widths to construct a street
section meeting current Renton standards. 162thAvenue SE and 164th Avenue SE are not open as
through streets, however they provide access for several abutting properties. Both of these streets have
adequate right-of-way widths to construct a street section meeting current Renton development
standards.
r.
Tess Annexation �
� �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area? Yes.Curb,gutter,sidewalks,and street lighting are non-existent on all streets within the proposed
annexation area,except for a single street light at the east end of SE 134th Street.The existing
pavement width and thickness on SE 132"d and SE134th does not meet current Renton development
standards.As noted previously, 162"d SE and 164th SE are not open to thrdugh tra�c,therefore,the
roadway paving that exists is limited and is used for access to several abutting properties. King County
has no plans for street improvements within the proposed annexation area.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Yes.
4. What additfonal facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Additional Transportation Systems staff would not be required.
Energy costs associated with existing and any new street lighting, and costs associated with
maintenance of existing and new street signage,traffic control signage and pavement markings that
may be incurred by the City as a result of this annexation should not be a financial burden.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
Yes.The City would assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for all existing streets within the
proposed annexation area.
Regarding transportation facilities, new agreements or franchises would not be required.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
We have no concerns with the boundaries as currently proposed.
General recommendation and comments: �
The Transportation Systems Division has no concerns whether the proposed annexation does or does
not occur.
Signature: Ll�'�- � f��vh�'�- Date: � � Zd� �
�aM��vr�,7'�T�oN Svs7r�t�
K',�vli�w �ou/�tID�N!}�'p�@
Page 2 of 2
�w�+' �
Annexation Review Form
(Piease return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED) �
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: Januarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
' �i� y���r��%���
Reviewing Department/Division: - �
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
�Gt���li��l���'N��/G[�/���� ��� �!!S G1'/�.
�
Tess Annexation �
� �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
a rea? �GfL°rlTlr/� ��Cf� ��� �.Y��'L�Gi�/��
���u4 /i7�`�'I/� �'�'' .
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�i'�i/C' �l�;t�� C6�i�l�Ii �!
�'! 1,�x/!/�a , �
�
����,y) rc�wr�
�. � �
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
anotherjurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
/��t- q7` �ii's ��aP r�a -
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
/�� .
General recommendation and comments: �
.
��'r�� cUY�e�l U�a��r..sPr� .
y ��
Signature: Date: /o� - O��""��
Page 2 of 2
,'
��r+' �
' Annexation Review Form
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED)
[X] 60%Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132nd
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20, 2010 Comments Due: lanuarv 7, 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: G��I �����
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
NU
�4
Tess Annexation
�I�`' `�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
No
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Y�y
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
h.b�. G
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
� a
General recommendation and comments: �
��vo vG
Signature: "" �"' 1 ' Date: � � ` '
Page 2 of 2
� ' �, I ` ; ' �
' '. ` cs'�, i w I
- � i ± i ; , �. �.� , ... cn
i � - i � i ; ax
Cn' _ i j I ; I� j 0� I \ I >
� � i �
I �
N= ,
� ' (� I � .�-, i
' Q ; , , SE 131st�St s� ; i i � ' . � i
�... ; � ; � - ' � � y31st PI � �' i
ao � l � ; � i , 4 i �
�' I I I � , ` I � i i- � �
� �
,, �_ ' SE131stLn �� � ' ; ' � ' �, ; � ' ,
i ' � , � i ; ' ; , i ;I '
j I 1 I ' I' �' ' I � I � � � j ! ''�
i
� j � �
� , � ' ; � , ?.-. .. . �. � ■ �r��na' t-- ■ ■ .:.;
, 1 �
�, � � � ' � � ■ Private R
� � d
� I � i ! � �, � I ' � I, � �
' ' -a ! �
n i I � �' � � ! '
�
� � � � �
i 4 ! ' � �
( �
� , � i ■ ,
ii ! ' ! � , _ _ ' � '
I � � , � !� � ■ � ■ � ■ �4;_� ■ ;
I � , ■ Private Rd �, , , - i .- ,
SE 133rd'PI ; �
i _ ; ; 3 � '; ji ' � ': � � . I � 1 i I !
� ; � ; i � �_ i ; . � _ i ; I ' ( ;
■ � i
; ; ,,� ', ' � ' i I __ _. ; i
- �- -- - - ' I i . , ' '. � '� ;1 i %
� � � � � � � �
' - �
w I � � ■���t■ � ■ �!'- _
I ' , !
� __ , �� � � ,, � ', - ; - ; ` SE 134th St
I �- �, � � - �
¢'I - � SE�'134th PI ; ; � � � ; - - '� ;
�� � 'w i � � � _ } % � � ! � �� ` �
�' � � � ' ' � ' � ' I I ' I I , � j �
lf�I ' � � ' i I ' '� l --- '�L . i , '' ') .
"'_ i ' 't ' , ' 'I _' i_ . _. _._�� � � i . ' i I ( �� � � ' �
� '> I i �
SE 135th St i ;�
� 1-- i �s . i '
I I I � ( � � 3 �'�--' ' I � i , ' ' . �
i
� - _ , ± � � I ___ � ' I I ' � � ,
r I ( F j I
�� �' � .. ... . � � �� � � � ( I ( I �
i � � . I ( ' ' I � � �
�1 � I __. II � 'I � � I � � � I ' � �
I �
File Name��\CED\Planning\GIS\G�S_pro�ects\annexahonsl
iess_annexlmxdsN_tess_annex_wcinity mxd
� �� �Peet � ����,;,�,-� .,..ta.�:���� � Tess Annexation
,:a,000 ' : '�-• _.
N ` ��-+ fi� Vicinity Map
�j�� �
Community&Economic Developrnent J ;; �
Alex Pietcch,Administratnr ��r"" �' r•�'
�drinnnA.Johnson,PlnnningTechll ..�,.��� ���_ C� City Limits �._!TessAnnexation Boundary
c��y or ;;;, �� �,s�� �
C'� � (�;E � ��� ;'�;<'� � ��.� � r_J�, .
� ���`� - December 17 2010
�, . .
,
� �
�
Annexation Review Form
. ... . .. .. . .. . �. i�� . . <. , , ... . �; ,.,,.,':t�,.,. . .:, !'.
[X] 60% Direct Petition
TO . Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT . Tess Annexation
Location . The proposed 16.3-acre Tess Annexation is located at the eastern portion
of the City limits. The area is bordered to the north by Southeast 132"d
Street,to the east by a parcel line,to the south by Southeast 134`h Street,
and to the west by 160th Avenue Southeast.
Date Circulated: December 20,2010 Comments Due: January 7. 2011
General Information
Area . 16.3 acres
Street length . 2,427 linear feet(existing)
Assessed Value . $2,509,000
Estimated Population . 16 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 7 Dwelling Units
Commercia) . N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 40 New Single-Family Detached Units
Future Population . + 92 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: _Surface Water Utilitv
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
The Tess annexation area is located in two drainage basins, the May Creek basin to the north and the
Cedar River basin to the south. For any future development within the annexation area will need to
comply with the City adopted Surface Water Design Manual (2009 King County Surface Water Design
Manual and City amendments — RMC 4-6-030). The flow control standard to be applied to new
construction in the annexation area is the Flow Control Duration Matching Forested Site Conditions.
`�r✓ °�.rr�
.
Tess Annexation
Y
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
The annexation area contains no developed surface water infrastructure. The approximately 1000 feet
of paved right-of-way conveys runoff via roadside ditch, with culverts placed at some properties. The
remainder of runoff is carried via sheet flow and natural drainage course to the northeast and
southeast. King County IMap records indicate no drainage complaints reported within the annexation
area.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
As the annexation area abuts City limits at 160`h Avenue SE, and lies within basins currently served by
the City of Renton, it is a logica)extension of services.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Upon annexation, City crews will be required to perform maintenance to roadside ditches. Additional
public storm systems will be constructed as the area is developed and maintenance needs will increase.
No new Surface Water Utility Engineering Section staff needed for this individual annexation, but as the
City continues to annex small areas,over time,eventually new staff resource will be needed.
Revenue from the seven existing single-family residential homes within the annexation area is
estimated to be$871 per year.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
The annexation area contains no County maintained drainage facilities. Storm system pipes/culverts
and structures (catch basins) in the public right-of-way will become the maintenance responsibility of
the Surface Water Utility. No agreements would be required.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
Current proposed boundaries are acceptable.
General recommendation and comments:
Signature: Ron Straka Surface Water Utilitv En�ineerin�Supervisor Date: 1-7-11
Page 2 of 2
HI..f ,.�� 15:�4 4�5-432-3863 P� t,�]lGlt� COAL Pfx�E BZ 1 B
: - "�rrr' �T��L.I.G
.� _, °�,�. a • ���, �
��,°� -_� . �s ts
. ;�� �
:�� ��� a�� �
rbnw�•�+i'rt� �►
r�rwrpr�icari�.�t���t� � Farvm�Rdrdl�t+-a�Jee tleos
, I�STER�1RPLI�ATK?� ,�, _
t��,yp�ar p�e�aath►�d�lc bnk.)
�D�►���r L�rme S�erwFoe
ar�s fi permoai�t erq►U�sartr�oe�.
. Cr1P 40a�3i-0OOS
1. Purpose o1'A�a�iication
Pbeaed�al�ba�roa a�ppbr
� 0 F��e Emplr�e�s
� ��e6dr���t.f����s�3 ����
n �� p E�ir+a E�Tvy�es undetA�s 18
c+o�opd�sed�rs��(4,iya►l�erqp�eral and 5 aarrip�a��sciar�s
� �aec�i��r�xt s�� p ���4�,e��pp6�6or►frs)
ii [i�i�arT�s Name O o�er
taol�s�$�at�S a�mplf�s a�sec8nr�t
a ,a�e�e��-��z.��as
r�a�.+�.m b.�
0 c�cr OpeR tAa�on-wmpiab�sec�ons Z,3s.�,�c�s
iridi�w0�c�d add�ess sa bs caomad�
2. Lic�r� arul Fe�s
rl�r�r tms,�es P�a�s�t�r r+s�arfr+�or+aeed�d�o c��ie�i�ehia�at
��� Fa�Du��
C!�oc —Da,�n want s�t�x�sst tor e��� C�`� 0 No No t'-�s
t7 b�du�rfai Ir�uranc�t,�yo�u r��s a�,�yae�1 No Fse
C�unsmp�oyrrrent�emc�pPr�o�.*i dsr. � 1 No FAt
Q�1fOr1M0�k P�t1Y1���Rf tllalflNf���T� NG'�
�N��@�81f1� �1�16�5 I�i���� ���
h1�C�OI�IlrL�0�1��(�!i6�ly�Or adl�D11�TI�d!NOIA!!��►1WAlk
uo.�a.�v s�eer�er�� . $
�'s�aicr ��
�T'awaw�"sPia�s � 5�60
� � ��
�
�
Ea�os�d�eckii�totd ana�tdw,�d� appi�t F!a � 1�•�
�PP��.rrhid�MUST 6e�r�ed v�IMs�m �
�dn�drpapr�t�a s,a wA.�M11M�T�N ST�[TE TR�AsuR� 'ioat anro�t Daa � 3��
a�..irapi(r«+r aw�b�•�sa�#o.iri.a�.tdrM.qIT+T�
R'i70b��Bltpillpi�011MrPop/d� �MOuAfOi�ti��►�A1��78ns�'1��4���
RECEIYED Y006-JAN-18 08:8GPa FROi�-425 48t 8888 TO-John L Scott Renton PAI� Q02