Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-434 ,f d NI�N 1b"' ' a'+•r 1�'" 1 MATCH LINE U��� C) 1H _ .c\\\\. J /t \\,C p _ I1� C�i I i �-O s 57 ^ -r s'I. :I: i : _ ' i J 1 1 1 4.LEL 1 1 ri __,{ c _i-c, r q 1 It Cr) -y r_- 1— g1 . 1 , vvov I • _ r—g —, a Ii r -1 1 IL i .--, C: t::: 7' . j 1 ' ! \. \ ----LTY7'—liryi ' : p, it; ItAncl il • 0 a m n 7 deL9ned e^c/us•ve/yT P A ZANONI 8"ASBOCIATEB R E N T a N = - i B D a.I ' o ,r,,,.e" e•,•, _.. CHUB CA/ o. rH� 4Z4.fg,V , =-- ((1,.: IS)&.Cg I/ OCI l�NNtNG h isP • / • i �e i 's I III R-2 ,i • . 0 ...t• .. ' S. — ,47-.1,,,:.,4?1 r 1 . , t q —3 i ;.-Ji'L '" ...' i','1....9: , , ...''.?'-•••,..:, ''' RCM `,, 1 { 1 /I r 4 .4; I • Sr~ •Jr`i•1+•nr, •�✓L!0 ' 1r r• :• 0 PP. •.;I •1t1ir M ' 1 r Po • • '»... .. ' ._.•!. Sao••, • ' ram odn• . •S .Jltr ii...•,..,. •._I,i> .la ; ,_"II °T.s.,P. r . ':' • • 1 •' • ' ': . • ...•14:X.-....rt vr-.1 ,:., • .I • . . , Pooai°•9 ' IA I ' ., f C. .j •;. }w •� I !t}3 . . . ry. . r. �o S} [ Fo-'• 51313t,1 Epp • t ij .N•''J l•.J•:r. �• 'I�• L J n I'i V°F;.QJ �� • 4 � t II IL ' ' '-i ' •• 4 ; . •4' ,:'� R_8 paioxp ItaNt• .,) dr., >s 'i'TI` ' 1 3 �cd4po� , 1. {11 • . !�. i _ • 1 I , ',r I i , , � � - I• '.0-- `�� ,� 6('�� :i,• ,�1. sty ri •C 7• T ! ' T ill •. • .1 •i ' yf•. T`•� �1 `•••.�,r• ,!'•P+ r' I~I • 1 i •rt 6 rr - .'.. � S® i t r•,,f FT Ti r • nn• `' ,•1 •• 0 .•s•!-� .'': Y 1 4., E i r'dl ,Lt® e1 1 ' • le/7. -.6 IR E I q/*0 li 3 or. •.,... i 1 sa..i . 11 e',. }NG L-B 1 • { ' Q •.. ram. 1 t ! Z ,.?i••_ r e W 1o( �'- r t r lr'r 1r- OF R4, �0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A `o• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 4 0,9gTcp SEP�� .+ December 3, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-434-79; SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene Dear Council Members: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated November 21, 1979, regarding the referenced application was forwarded to Council Members on November 28, 1979 and scheduled for placement on the City Council agenda for December 10, 1979. On December 3, 1979, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk within the 14-day appeal period. A copy of the appeal letter is attached for your review prior to reschedulin• of the application on the City Council agenda of cember 17, 197 J If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. Sincerely, -17a • \Gui-d"'-- Fred J. Kaufman cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachments 40 CITY OF RENTON R570NE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLl' / �j LAND USE HEARING1(t/7/ -APPLICATION NO. Jam..n �tJ" ��/ EXAMINER 'S ACTIO 7 a APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTA •�•+r . ��` FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND D A �;! (� C) HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name First Church of the Nazarene--Renton Phone 271-3206 Address 246 N. Wells Renton, Wn. g8055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 850 Union Ave. N.E. between N R in+h S- and N.E. 7th St. 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 6 - acres 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Parcel A: North 100 feet of North half of south half of southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter located in Section 10, township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wn: Except portion lying within 132nd Ave. S.E. • Parcel B: North half of south half of southwest quarter of northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wn: Except the north 100 .feet thereof and except the south 110 feet thereof, and except portion lying within 132nd Ave. S.E. I 16 . Existing Zoning G Zoning Requested NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site pnild a Church and Parking facilities • 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Tmmedietely 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 a AFFIDAVIT I , REF,urelAi eff t112cq o7,= iyE 1)42-4,e,-,qN being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 27 day of i U 6- , 19 ;q , • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at \4,\I \cD 1\ . k . , (Name of Notary Public) Tf ignature of Owner (Address) (Address) A35A/7d c/ GJ14 (City) (State) 2 7/ —Z2 c7C • Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing appl,i��ati•o-n h1a�f7) en inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and corm 1e'te•`k]� f eve/y articular and to conform to the rules and regulations of �be Kenyon Planni g Department c``\�,_. governing the filing of such application[ ,`' 10 1— ) Date Received , 19 B h ' ,`I/VNINGi/ Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ` (31F R ";� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM f--:-.." ni11 t�,;.. � CA\ ;i 1019 , V FOR OFFICE USE ONLY '\ /0;y Application No. ze— r-73el---2 %' ''�`''%G -1 Environmental Checklist No. C.0 - ;/(1---)`�% ^= PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: 0 Declaration of Significance ElDe,claration of Significance IDDeclaration of Non-Significance EI Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. i The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent First Church of the Nazarene--Renton • 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 246 N. Wells • Renton, Wn. 98055 271-3206 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Renton First Church of the Nazarene 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of Church and Educational facilities -- approx. /414/00 sq. ft. plus :parking for /00l cars. `2 , .00 18A a ' r -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 850 Union Ave. N.E. (formerly 11806 Union (132nd) S.E.) on approx. 220 x 500 ft. of cleared land. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : - /' F 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : / a�7 w.�'a..rr?f I- e 7 c✓kaJC .3� C :J/ 6 1 \ 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Y -,S- i1/9/ is K I.1` Ti /7c Cif ` 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe�� // /the nature of such application form: N /A II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x YES MAYBE NO (b); Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? x YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief - features? x YES MAYBE NU— (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x YEs— MAYBE NU— (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: Compactable soil will be introduced for parking an61a %lk a • • -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X • Y€ — MAYBE W (b) The creation of objectionable odors? x VET- MAYBE T� (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x • - YT MAYBE• NV Explanation: • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either -marine or fresh waters? x YT MAYBE KU- (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x VET UWE 0- (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x VET- MAYBE NA- -(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water • body? x Y MATTE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x Y€f— MAYBE RI— M Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YT MAYBE U- (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters,' either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an'aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? x Y MAYBB€ N (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x • Y€V MAYBE i�i Explanation: Surface water drainage will be installed for parking • area. • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x YEr UM- ia' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Try MAYS N ' (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the-.normal replenishment of existing • species? YET- MAYBE WU— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? onit p g Explanation: Landscaping r -#� c := 'I�, o, "1 t 1 �,." } el., 1, -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including • reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES M YBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE N0 • Explanation: • (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Parking lighting (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES RUNE NO • Explanation: Utilities (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion 'or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES Miff NO Explanation: (11) Population; Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y MAYBE NO Explanation: ,� .. -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x YES MAC NO (e) Storm water drainage? YEAS— RATITE NU— (f) Solid waste and disposal? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: public building needing the extention of these services. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x Y•€T— MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES RAMIE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �`si' gned name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 .4 ,, r -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? x YES MAYBE YO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x YES MAYBE VO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x YES— MATTE 40 (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES— M YBE 0 (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ' x vEs-- MAYBE 0 Explanation: The normal increase in vehicular traffic. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? ► YES MAYBE 0 (b) Police protection? YES RATTE 0 (c) Schools? ' YES MAYBE 0 (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ►' YES MAYBE 0 (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? ► YES MAYBE 0 (f) Other governmental services? ' YES- MAYBE0 Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x YES KABE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? TES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x YES MAYBE NI (b) :::::: atb0 icns systems? '1 1/ MMAY � f YES BE N' (c) YES MAYBE N 1k. eo4 `\ � --- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 30 , 19 79 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1, File R-434-79; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E. 2 . FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN SR-1 ZONE , File SP-433-79 ; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E. 3. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. , METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, INC. , NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CO. (VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, SUBDIVISION NO. 1) , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT 25-ACRE INDUSTRIAL SHORT PLAT, File 431-79; property located on Lind Ave. S.W. between S.W. 16th St. and S.W. 19th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON QCTOB,ER 30, 1979 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 19 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before re, a Notary Public , �— on t o 1 _day of (t_" rrz 19 J SIGNED , . , .....„ . . , . .. . . . . , . .,. . c,,-', , !,\ •' . . . . ••-•. .. • . ., •. .. `,..:2,,, . . • :1.‘', ,- -' , . • .' . , . . , . • ' .6r1.-74, . . - .. ' ' - ragiff.-7 .-::::.4 f.„7,,, ,,,.,,w,o,„: .., .4c-i.,-,,,,,m.,1 . . ,,,, . •'r - li,V, . . PY-i ..: . „. ,-"--1-4,:it 'f-'.- ,q..:, ,.:,....- :-. ., , - • . :, , ..,r,::7; , :,',,,,..,.; • . : -,,,,t ,. r.-. .,,,, ,,,,...., I.,- . ., ,.,-, .:,.:,,„ . .- • . • - . i.: , ,....o...,:, ' - , ',,t1 • t...:!, rek. wr,: , -.. 4t$:,,r.,!,-- ,, . :( .4. - '-'-' .'-‘,:d:=•':)fa,'" gal -,''1'.. 4iirPiT '''' Y'''.4M.". 1 -11",-M1135,44--1 .A',. . ,:. . .•' • - -,777 ".:.r.:,,, F'Zi'''..„:••,.. -1,-TP,, ,775,740-• . "1 'CA-7'A 751Z9 tr,•'''''-•\ ry, v, ''':'v," 1.'i.•r,..:4,,,,,,,, -,.4m i-:.-,,4 ., .,-,;- i--...,i :.,-,. y,.i , ,*4 : ,'.."..-4..k,, ,:'•.e..,-;-,, ''',Y,177.;,,,,':;.,17 ".'!" . !,.:I,. 17„';,‘,...,'%'..:*:,1 •-,, .-:i.'Z'4' ‘'''''::1 ,f,,,.': ;.,,:. : .'.:,.:; ,.'7.7j,: '.::',7/ '...:'1''',-.:!4',.. ".':',#'A .`::Y''!'. trl\'" •^".-.. L.,,,,, - ,,,,zo!...;) li.,, f:,, • „,— t,1 ' ','p rA FJ,..; t,..:1 .1:1 ,i',.,',k-) ,,....:, '' '- i.:,,,I..1 1.,'4.,`, v..;.. ,./ ,,:,:':, :,,- ...-.] w b';:a '-,:''','- Li,:ill '''"..,-1;•' L''', ra_,..:..1 ,..' -:. -,,. \,:-..." '2iia: kiz..J . .•,. . GENERAL. LOCATION: AD, OF ADDIIESS: ) . - , . . 1- ROPERTY LOCATED AT 850 UNION AVE NE .. : LEGAL DESCAP i i OR , . . . .• . . 1, ;i . • ,. . . , . LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF APPLICATION ARE ON FILE IN. . ,- - THE R E VTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . . . . , i. . , . If !. LI S PO:,,,ST.g.'''Ll TO 011FA7 PlOPF'7 01W a "TY IE"a' OF - .6., , , A.0 , 1 j _‘ _ _ ;-...T--,,I.- r , L.-A ttr.,?. , '31 9 i,f,F--.1 i 4i. ,v,-,fas ,,A ::,:------p,,,r4 ..,',..,,+,,,„ ifil A 1,-,,,,,,,,,7,,,,, i•:•3 C'41 `,q 71 ,,,,,. . Al h..-i:;-,,V07 t-,t, V,i 1_,.-:-1-:cs,,, ,-.4 1 kM ',, „,,-...., ::-.4_,L.,-,--7, ,‘,1,,A,,,N tt. -..,.-).,.-./ ',..,,,,V).4.- tl 2,04 .3-/---, A .A___,T.I ..-1, .i. k,-,r-4z. A--, ii.-.74\ .id i; s,.:.„...,-,-. ., J-i'.'in.- ::-..,:::-.,' 4A:'?:]-,10 - •;,,,L2,., ::4 -4M7,73 ' VI, ti 5- ,c .,!,. ? +, TO BE HELD , .Y --, ' 11!' ( OP_INOL CFNME_I"-:RS Pviltin5CA f`.341 it_: NIC) ‘„_,., -LI it -,,,, - 1j-, --- - L V/ ----, 2- ";' , ' ' .... • — ,.. ' ,4 e,--, 44' i,! BE"..-..eriliNk''it-Vri Air q 00 Ai f,^. . ,,.. ,7i ,_... : [1 " - t- l--Rz,r.le%rap-FAPPlimirt ri 7 ii:r\ 0 71`xt,f4A Vq 9:::,LI iirc4E1GV‘7.i Li rd E.,-.3, .5'E ...:J. . r.,.... :), ,(:''' .,0 rtli .1, ,,i4 '1 :1 - kr= -r - ‘,..,./F:j itAr„,,,d6i.-t - g ' u-,,,,, 1-ROM 6 10 SR-I„FILE R-434-79 F ,,,, „, , ,. .4„ .i.7 .. 0. -,...2 • , A tr'EPtiri:4 1 ,,,N., ,,,D- eo,it. -,f-,.ke riti-Vf.:•57•0 r :,!. : 8 .-A ' APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT IN SR-I ZONE c , ., FILE SP-43'3-79 1, , 71 ZE it., -.. vft-17.%it. , . „ r,--] ,-..,... ,s7, ki, ,,, ,,,,,,, .,...,, 1..64,&° ,,,,,,< \il R. ,,,,,. t, , , i:-A - L.' ,,i is 1 .'..--.,.., - tAi .7,1 ii: t8 ' t,.. 1, , 1 V.4;11 t7 .A /7E3:45) T;),`I'Ml A.,1 ,,, ,.4,-.F.„, '6 o ' 0 Y` ",,t,-::, A '1'-'.1 . , [1 . , ,,_ (-,,,,b, ri 0 ,oit. CI '-' -- -,rin- i-Zd .,h', .„,, '''%R'01$14, —:„. 1 " ',, 'k"''' --, rw-lagizz')f-7.A 7 !ar, .'7 il A),,,,,,, . En \''''- , 1; ih ', ,:, `1Z. i r_an 1N1' 4-4 V*1 1,k1 1,71, a 6,4 Fmn f",....`. F.4 F-64?.)K-1173 il Myr[i , r''' ''''i - 'Ir•'. , ,,--,,„ . „,,,,.,. 1.,„..,., \,-, .-;„ t ,1 , it, . -. at.T. Aom l. 1 LA e ,..-,--- Li 7 1 ,I ',EL,' ,. ,- -,-, "' ''' ' 4 i'.1r,-.T.Z, ' '.' 'h"./ .--....= '1 ri I i,i i t ,/ ....._, [.....-J -- t i I I t ., . '1'H FOR FURTHER DXFORMATION CALL 235 2550 1111S i101i6E NOT TO BE REMOVED Wrri104.17 PROPER Aft,f111ORP.,-A.1105 ) OF RA,A iv .�L o THE CITY OF RENTON U �/ a"` z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 o _ INN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 4). 235- 2550 �P o94TFD SEPIA October 17 , 1979 Itiors41: perch cif• the Nazarene! 246 North Wells Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR FROM G TO SR-1 , File R-434-79 , AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN SR-1 ZONE, File SP-433-79 ; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E . Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 8 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for October 30. 1979 at 9 :00 a.m. • Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director B y : .q � ✓t., UX-L Ror J . Blaylock Associate Planner OF R4, 11, 14".1 �5 oz. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. REFJTON.WASH.98055 ocacap MR 4 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 9 MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT A q) 235-2550 0,91 1.eO SEPrtE ��P J _ October 24, 1979 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RE : FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT REQUESTS R-434-79 and SP-433-79 As requested by Pastor Lowell Welker of the First Church of the Nazarene in his letter of October 24, 1979 , public hearings relating to the subject appli- cations will be continued to November 13th. RJB:wr PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The site is generally level. 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries , row crops, and for urban development . 3. Vegetation : The bulk of the subject site has been cleared but mixed stands of deciduous and conifer trees line the perimeter. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site (October ,17, 1979) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is primarily undeveloped. However, one existing single family residence is located on the property together with various accessory structures. Honeydew Elementary School is located directly to the south of the subject site. There are existing single family residences located north of the site and west of the site across Union Avenue N.E. Kiwanis Park is located north and west of the subject site across Union Avenue N.E . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are primarily single family resi- dential with some mixed public/quasi-public uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: A 12" water main and 15" storm sewer run north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site, while an 8" sanitary sewer extends east- west on N.E. 10th Street within 700 feet to the north of the property. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 107 and 108 operate along Union Avenue N.E'. adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools: The Honeydew Elementary School is adjacent to the subject site on the south, while McKnight Middle School is approximately 1* miles to the northwest , and Hazen High School is within 3/4 of a mile to the north- east . 5. Recreation: The grounds of the Honeydew Elementary School and Kiwanis Park provide good opportunities for nearby recreation. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS 'OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4-729 , G, General Classification District 2 . Section 4-704, SR-1, Suburban Residence District 3. Section 4-706( 3) , Churches by Special Permit PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 13, 1979 • APPLICANT : FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FILE NUMBERS ; R-434-79 and SP-433-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a special permit to allow expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 2. Applicant : RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 3. Location : Vicinity of 850 Union c (Vicinity map attached) Avenue N.E. . just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. 4.; Legal Description: A detailed legal descrip tion is available on fil- in the Renton Planning Department . 5. ' Size of Property : ±6 . 5 acres. 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classification District , minimum lot sire 35,000 square feet . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: S-1, Residence Single Fa ily, minimum lot . size 40,000 -quare feet; G, General Classif' ca- tion District , GS-1, Gen-ral Classification District , mini- mum lot size 35,000 square feet . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential. 10. Notification : The applicant was notifi-d in writing of the hearin: date; notice was properl published in the Record Chronicle on October 19, 1979, and posted in thre- places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on October 18, 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 3058 dated August 24, 1976 , at which time the present zoning classi- fication was applied. On March 29 , 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site (reference file SP-003-77) . A building permit was issued •n November 5, 1979, for one phase of the church construction. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13 , 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. In March of 1977, the Renton First Church of the Nazarene obtained a special permit from the Hearing Examiner to construct a church on a site just north of the honeydew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. The special permit allowed for a church of approximately 20 ,000 square feet set back approximately 300 feet from Union Avenue N.E. and 100 feet from the northern property line. The appli- cant has modified their plans by upgrading the quality of the exterior treatment of the building, moving the struc- ture forward approximately 150 feet and increasing the structure by 6 , 800 square feet to allow a full sized gymnasium. 2. In the original review in 1977, it appears that several points may have not been adequately addressed. First , a minimum of a 100 foot setback is required from any other developed lot which is zoned residential. The Honeydew Elementary School site to the south is zoned GS-1. The property was annexed in July of 1959 and given a GS-1 zoning classification , even though the school was pre-existing on the site. In 1965, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site into a Public/Quasi-Public Land Use Classification. The site was never rezoned to P-1 because there was never any reason to. The school was already existing. The G zone is still a residential zone. However, in this particular case, it is not developed with residences. Therefore, it is not seen as a requirement in the opinion of the Planning Department . Secondly, the Hearing Examiner in 1977 approved the build- ing location only 18 feet from the southern proper4 line. Section 4-706( 3)( a)4. requires a 25-foot landscaping strip along all property lines. It would appear that this is a code requirement that the Hearing Examiner may not have had the authority to modify. However, a building permit has been issued on the site for the construction of a church as originally allowed, and it would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback. 3. The site plan complies with the other requirements as designated in Section 4-706( 3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern property line. It will have to be set back 25 feet instead of the 18 feet shown. This will reduce the parking by 4. However, the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces. The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans. Therefore, the parking required still remains the same, 90 parking spaces. 4. The church construction has been divided into three phases. Phase 1 is presently under construction. It is composed of the multi-purpose room/gymnasium. It complies totally with the special permit issued in 1977. Phases 2 and 3 include the sanctuary and the foyer. These are intended to be extended to the west of the original building site. The structure was moved to the west because the exterior treatment of the building was upgraded to cedar finish instead of metal and to allow better access for fire fighting. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965, Objectives, pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 10-' Natural Systems: Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact on the property. However, subsequent devel- opment will remove the soils, disturbing the vegetation, increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise level in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, many of these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not applicable. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Development of the subject site as a church will provide increased opportunity for social interaction within the area congregation. 5. Traffic : Data on average daily trips (ADT's) is not available for churches from the Traffic Engineering Divi- sion. Therefore, given an estimate of two trips/week/ parking space, a total of 180 trips/week would result (based on 90 required stalls) . It should be noted, how- ever, that these trips will all occur at the same time, J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1972 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposals (see attached) . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5, ' City of Renton Fire Department 6. City of Renton Police Department 7. City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1. The proposed rezone from G to SR-1 is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan, which desig- nates the site and surrounding area as single family resi- dential. 2. The subject site was annexed in 1976. Since that time , no area-wide or site rezoning requests have been considered on the site. 3. Items 1 and 2 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 of the Renton Municipal Code, thus substantiating the proposed rezone. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone from G to SR-1 based upon the compatibility of the proposed use with existing uses and tie fact that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review, and being consistent with. the Compre- hensive Plan land use element designation of single family residential. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY- REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FIVE 5. A revised landscape 'plan has not been submitted. However, care should be taken to insure that proper screening is required to reduce the visual impact. The church has been set back the same distance from Union Avenue N.E. as the Honeydew Elementary School to be compatible with the school instead of dominating that side of the street. 6. Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees exist on the site from the house eastward to the property line. Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan. 7. A screen fence was suggested as a possible addition along the northerly landscape strip; however, propery landscap- ing will be more effective than a fence. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested special permit , file number SP-433-79 , subject to the following conditions : 1. Revision of. the landscaping strip on the southern boundary of the rear parking to a width of 25 feet . 2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plans including the revisions noted in "L" and the retention of existing. trees wherever possible. Removal of trees shall be subject to prior approval of the Renton Planning Department in accordance with detailed landscape plans. 3. Final Planning Department approval .of screening methods along the north and south property lines. 4. Posting of a bond or other approved means of insuring proper landscaping installation and maintenance as per ordinance requirements. 5. Parking lot lighting shall be of low height and intensity to reduce glare and light intrusion to adjacent single family residence. 6. Exterior loud speakers shall be permitted. 7. The portion of the site not developed at this time shall be retained in its natural state, and any future plans for this area shall be approved by the Examiner. The purpose of these requirements is to reduce the impact of the proposed development in the adjacent single family residences and retain the general character of the area. C y , M. �,V i9 1 a 1 t i �� • .11.E��"',"/---''-�- -`1 ei �I wrC•:. •:. ' ir f ,7 � _ ee® r..4.'• ••,• - r'. k._._._ m ,. ,Fr,R om+c f°( % — w fit, _R._ ._:..1,, ,., ,0 im ;...3.,—,--r,....,,„,) ,.1...... 4-.. --...c..A.,. .,..,g„•.;•-....... , .., . ....? .. . • ,. 9 .11 , ,. , , „.::..,3. _ _ .. .„ ,... . ,....• ._,:. a . a 7.I . 4 , .p................... i‘."..N...,,,,, '''-'-L'i:-"Q.:-- ..y -•• •• - - • {,, ...... t.•.;:t1,.. ii i .3 , ._si,.., , .. ., _ii,T.,.i. .... .„,„4.z. ,;...,.. ...:,....t.:,, ....„ . , 1 1 .1„...2.3... •1. ; .1 : . .::. ,-,:\ ,•,,„.....,:,.....,„4„,,....„, ..i R,,..64, 7 ...kii : '1 � t ' '+,,•.,- ,„... ,„:__ ,-$p,,• ---1,\ .,-\_1—v_..,(-,:i .. • '+•$ ,1w ' • \ _. _a _._ • ` a • $ a'.L. ea ( ! �. � +'+e-.. + �f i _4 11 : -a� _l - ,Sc,-1 ,_rd.;,.. ie , a s{r���Mba ,do ,�`•y - [ + - -• i'.c:. .ls:1t•,+q °•>•+ r' ' 4�� f=;C� f1 iE ('dti J �'I� o � 4 `F. .1. .•... 7 •s v -r1 w � ,t t. > ,Ar • LIi...�..Gf f I. V. .' 1 r. !vr •1 ``^�' 11•�. -L,� is Jl`.I:� . p' ,!•�: ' el+.�'r a W, , ia di f -I r �,.•aa-`_ r *�3..�_ ,4. , � . �q „•:.•41 Y _ _ .., •zr •sa .a �.o®®®® i 11 Alt Sgl I- '.. -1- , .. sir j'._Y `�„ it' `m:''.�' r. . /� ' An' trce $n:I.,...k90n►. .. . 14, uae-MC A.Nbk.tXeh ,P'. �., ,.. ,al.. • •`..ri :i..,.;, �`{, ail" ' f R®o `' � 't Rm1 i 1 l_ 4-if 1 8 eE j ' i"' __ k.-_- t1.L.y" }.S - ! - 4.11 t,'��� I C�7 Y eer'0l�d 1,4 ,`��T. Jil.�a 'Y?#z( • r ,`{ ik'-.L + � ; yr' •3*,@.,1. • + � to=r=9 ,,,, .,, _.ry1 • • ,C�.0 yce1,...^'L'�.. fl4. 'li�•` -f• _____.a -t {..ASS.—_aca---at I ,1 It E •l• +.:F�._l' ••"^1s`C,, `n 1 �',� I fJ(z�r5. n 6I .�--a _ _ 1 La it'tl 1,_}.1_' ,.].� 1 ,..• 1) ' �_ ! tr �I ,•,•. 11 a... -ti i-._-- - -+• _°�"{`�``' °''91 otr>•*P•cs•.a.eeeceo-•ms. ' I. T -- • ..,....,.w,,,.,«.. ..,.....• ...._, w,e,•. .w• .w.v..,.,�._....n,....,:.w...ewe.c,err,•+.,.,µ. 'L , , i1 , iri... • ,' a' i � � �W 9 1 j �� z • y I I e ,I.. 4 tl REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT: ' FIRST CHURCH 'OF THE NAZARENE APPLICANT FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE TOTAL AREA ±6. 5 a_2res i PRINCIPAL ACCESS Union Avenue N.E, EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District EXISTING USE One single family residence/undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS r LI : iz,L.§ L.,.) LI LI LI LI LL 1 1..3 i 1 11 f.2 ti ' a----, DOD ,-.A.,-0.,:i,,,.• . .. .. t , ...... , 7,7, al:Fv‘ C300E300E00 ' ' , 0 , . ) ...._t__ ...,...„. _ ..—....w.,_,.....Th r N. g, 1 0 1-11 57-, ....... 0 173 E3 0 El ;. E: 5.301 Si•W D 043.17_,...._........ E] ' cm cm-ca ri- 0 0 i a n ci 1.. L-4 C.= ,..r.... 0 & ?i 00 0, J L._n 0 i. . 1 0 I I [Al ' 0 5 er ll ' v 8 a., r..,=,) cz,c,,,,,,,, ro c,,,,,„, c)•-,-: I, a)a-..,- co a=a,CZ3 Ckiii..= CT= 0 G 0 tic,00 ilwa , 0 , ::. S.F. sg s.(.... , , ...............i.,........ . ss. g sF. ; itc,60 6 0 ise.,ca ,5.r. n LI ii t It—il , 9'11 CI-ry 1...rivity-,5 CD igKIM- CO 0-117m CM,Cr....13 MU=co .7L-..,'",C3 017:1770 CD C7T4T ell cm=0 eL,M571 C.9 cEzu=es,eemeD co ., c=7.,ez iv, , .. g , :: .... ,c...,v“•--t,„4,‘714- ,-.: : F'' . r . I : , g : .... ' -i'.,...•... ....,,:,...; . : : :. :11.0(,'ii:!.,' !,..:::.,:::.: :... : :::..*. i :.,.:: , ::: . :. , : , : : , ;7; !' - , 'Ts f.D1-.tilsE- ' .4. t 9R10.591 f• ! '''''''''',....... I kd ! ei-g140A17ga I 1 ...,,,, . '.- z) . eiry td,417-.5 aZD 0 C:Z) 0=120 0 (., ,-"-)0(71"7"M CD rr."77' 0 977Z)0 C ,i....,..,I=0 crIrml,0 to 0 a hempc . t , , , ( 1 1,t Iwo° %% fl ..„..__............... ,. , 0 . I C;1 .....1 0 J E : . 1 ., A A \dC1,3 I 0 : , ,...,‘,.1 . SCRA4-6 Baa Zoos , iulLuctr*.,;51.rfe. Figsr co u g.c„d cv NA&ATaths sP- II 33- 71 ' ' '' .•- —7,:',--:•,,f. •1 • • . • • . . • _ . , . • 1 0 _ . / ;;f1...•'.... - C \ _ _ - -- . . 7 -,- -'. - - —----- ..)----- - '---, - --' . .. , , 7 c,,, ._....... „ . .„. , ,,......-- . . 11 _';•- 7 -; f , _ , : , i: I' i •: • . . • I --' \•• --L-,-- i , 11 •j:- L.—-;_-_-17----.7=7-7.1 - ; ;;._ ,, ; - -. -'--, - :,i , 7,1,••,-7• ...... ti• -I- ;,_...--7 s .; • , ,, I , • l• 1 --z-., !! . _... . . • , .. , • ,frPH-1As a 14 A S E 3 .; / :r ''• 0.. ' /,, •-• .=-' : ,-,•,.-.= !. ; . :' . • —P H 4 s E i . ,; __,---; , , ! ,-.-,-•: - 1 • ,, . z ;—____. .1 .; I ; ; , , ; • ,.. •:: ......... . -, ; o•• .._:- . ! _ • -i . . . , . . ' I .... VNDer-a, CONTgUCT=IIKI ! .‘ •i• ":„ ,-.- -- 1 :, • • t•-)r: ';.; . . . • :::!.‘-' '.! • . ,. • .: .• • •:••-, !:i..•••••+ !' . _•.,- -__ ::.,• -.....- !! •• ----,-. _ „ •-__::, s•-_•••• • — ::;.... , .4 „ , . : _. : '-; i ,","' ;'"--...',.';:.. ..:',,47:: ,,-•"",-,• r : , .. -•. ', f; . , _-. .- , ". ),..:,_,... :. i _ _I• .,_ • _ . • ........, .....,„., . . ____. _ - -, gr- 1 ...z. • , -,ectitcm, . , .... ......... "ra...i..„..i t 05____ _ sr. Li 3 3- 75 1 .. sp. o o 3 7 7 1 k N. =gage _ • . .,.. : , . ,..,„.„.„....„,„:•_. ..., BY 5:UU PM' ON __121pv/79 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT) VISION: 7-- //:-r.11:/ ' Z_:_,- A).6/kr_ /AZ 4 ;-. Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved ' -- Pi , •_ C,_,___ ' ,.• ,_, /6,// ,/77 signature of Director or Authorized Represe ;tative Date nr w T.rw•T Nr. .nrpAumrNT/III_VISION : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks and Recreation . Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved . , . , . c . . --.,---- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0 fre...12- ____ ___ _____ Approved_ Approved with conditions Not Approved , • . • —6,(,.4L - a-------------- /01it--. 7_7____. v . Sianature of Director or Authorized Representative Ta- e REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ _____ _ ___ Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved J ' - .---- -----...-- ignatiire of Director Or AuiieTci—.Representative Date • enton Planning Department • . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 7,04 ( ' 7 ee,9494,/06,4904oreirg. Coa e o d (CA C A 12_0(1 143 - ,5&24617,0p, OfilegooritR acpt' GIUM-00 Location : bolleaei 0 RS r ApPlicant : psi CA well TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : j , ),' 17 Police Department A. R. MEETING._/q f44 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering • ketUilding Division • 6 Utilities Engineering ,... y Fire Department • Of�li1 NTS OR S�iGGEST ONS' R GARS I fG; THIS A��P I CAT ION SHOULD 3 zOV :TIED IN WRI1-I�IG OL THE APPLICA( I01 REVIEW COW RE.NCE (ARC) 10 jj HELD ON BE IIEI. D � � AT 9 :G)G) AM IN THE IE THIRD FLOORCONFERENCE T�L F YOUR DEPARTMENT/�DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE +WXLL NOT BE )ABLE ETOE ATT N THE ARC, PL ASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPAR "MENT BY 5:�0 PM ON ® /9 -. _ �=�.2_.�.- __=':__.._.�ti-^ ��'ZrLc'C'.L'_.:. .ul•S{tppg REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:______ iL.Approved Approved with conditions . Not Approve ,6/ • di /6 _L2, Signature of D.i-rector or Authori zed Representative Late REVIE:I•lING nEPARTMENT/DIVISION:__ Approved _X Approved with conditions - _Not Approved • D 43/ S nnature of Director or Autir�ri ied I epic n e Date tati REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : --- ----- Approved 1pprov 2cl with con i lions __Not Approved PROPOSED/FINAL . CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE )N—SIGNIFICANCE R-434-79 Application No . SP-435-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-514-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone of 6. 5 acres from "G" to "SR-1" and expansion of church facilities by 6 , 800 square feet . Proponent FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Location of Proposal 850 Union Avenue N.E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have xD not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS I' is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was mae after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and Policies, 2. Meets all mitigating measures of Zoning Ordinance. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offi1ial David R. Clemens Title S ni,br Plarlhe Date November 9 , 1979 Signature /V -4%Ci��(:-liJ City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF R4,4, A �� o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ O Z' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 42• 235- 2550 0 47•& SEPSE°�P MEMORANDUM October 24, 1979 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RE : FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT REQUESTS R-434-79 and SP-433-79 As requested by Pastor Lowell Welker of the First Church of the Nazarene in his letter of October 24, 1979, public hearings relating to the subject appli- cations will be continued to November 13th. RJB:wr D`� i _r Gt,,411/ RENTON ^ ,, frc. 5t }_ a,.�rwf CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE ,, 850 UNION AVENUE NORTH EAST RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE: 271-3206 Pas#on: Mina od M 8 V: LOWELL O. WELKER WILLTAM K. HARMANING Phone: 772-2815 Phone: 226-4083 October 24, 1979 . • • Mr. Fred Kaufman Office of the Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: First Church of the Nazarene Files • R-434-79 SP-433-79 Dear Sir: This letter is in reference to the request by the church to extend our church facility at 850 Union Avenue North East and to rezone the property. Because of unavoidable circumstances, the front elevation plans and drawings needed in our presen- tation will not be available for the public hearing scheduled for October 30, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. We, therefore, respectfully request that the public hearing be continued until November 13, 1979. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Your Servant in Christ, :=3 ;fee. %2 .c..4.s,,,,2,,, Lowell Welker, Pastor-president LW/ag cc Planning Department of City of Renton 'RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 0 C T 2 41979 Am PM 718191101}102r1 a2o3•4151f OF R4,, s?, THE CITY OF RENTON U %o t4 OZ CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ..a. o FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS o MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 200 MILL AVE. S./RENTON, WA. 98055 ■ 235-2642 o9gr�D sEP�E���P CHIEF: DICK GEISSLER August 23, 1979 Pastor Lowel Welker First Church of the Nazarene 246 Wells Ave. No. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Pastor, Regarding our conversation on fire protection requirements on your new proposed church located on Union Ave. N.E. , just north of Honeydew Elementry School. A new water main and fire hydrant will be required. The fire hydrant shall be located approximately one half way of the building within fifty feet of exterior wall near entrance. A fire alarm system is required, I would recommend this system be connected to a central station. Changing your building plan so that building would be located closer to Union Ave. N.E. would make for easier access for emergency use as well as making better use of fire hydrants on Union Ave. N.E. . If I can be of further assistance, please call. Sincerely, RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER I , V131979 Richard Geissler, Chief Am PM Renton Fire Department 71819110,11,.12,I1213,4,5,6, RG/cr ITEM NO / (7 77, .. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER' 13, 1979 PAGE TWO: D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The site is generally level. • 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil *is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops, and for urban development . 3. Vegetation : The bulk of the subject site has been cleared but mixed stands of deciduous and conifer trees line the perimeter. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat. for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site (October 17, 1979) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is primarily undeveloped. However, one existing single family residence is located on the property together with various accessory structures. Honeydew Elementary School is located directly to the south of the subject site. There are existing single family residences located north of the site and west of the site across Union Avenue N.E. Kiwanis Park is located north and west of the subject site across Union Avenue N.E . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are primarily single family resi- dential with some mixed public/quasi-public uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: A 12" water main and 15" storm sewer run north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site, while an 8" sanitary sewer extends east- west on N.E. 10th Street within 700 feet to the north of the property. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 107 and 108 operate along Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools: The Honeydew Elementary School is adjacent to the subject site on the south, while McKnight Middle School is approximately 14 miles to the northwest , and, Hazen High School is within 3/4 of a mile to the north- east . 5. Recreation : The grounds of the Honeydew Elementary School and Kiwanis Park provide good opportunities for nearby recreation. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING 'CODE : 1. Section 4-729, G, General Classification District 2. Section 4-704, SR-1, Suburban Residence District 3. Section 4-706( 3) , Churches by Special Permit } RE I EIVED CITY 0 RENTON HEARIN EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT v 31979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 718.0:10,11: ,1:213,4,5,6 NOVEMBER 13, 1979 APPLICANT: FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FILE NUMBERS : R-434-79 and SP-433-79 EXHIBIT NO. / A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: ITEM l� O. i -„ 7/ The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a special permit to allow expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: ' RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 2. Applicant : RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 3. Location : Vicinity of 850 Union (Vicinity map attached) Avenue N.E. . just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal descrip tion is available on fil- in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property: ±6 . 5 acres. 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: "G" , General Classification District , minimum lot si-e 35,000 square feet . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: S-1, Residence Single Faaily, minimum lot size 40,000 .quare feet; G, General Classif ca- tion District , GS-1, Gen-ral Classification District , mini- mum lot size 35,000 squa e feet . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notifi -d in writing of the hearin;. date; notice was properl , published in the Record Chronicle on October 19, 1979 , and posted in thre- places on or near the si e as required by City ordnance on October 18, 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 30'►8 dated August 24, 1976 , at which time the present zoning cl :ssi- fication was applied. On March 29 , 1977, the Hearing Exam. ner approved a special permit for church facilities on the sit;- (reference file SP-003-77) . A building permit was issued 4n November 5, 1979, for one phase of the church. construction PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. In March of 1977, the Renton First Church of the Nazarene obtained a special permit from the Hearing Examiner to construct a church on a site just north of the Ioneydew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. The special permit allowed for a church of approximately 20,000 square feet set back approximately 300 feet from Union Avenue N.E. and 100 feet from the northern property line. The appli- cant has modified their plans by upgrading the quality of the exterior treatment of the building, moving the struc- ture forward approximately 150 feet and increasing the structure by 6 , 800 square feet to allow a full sized gymnasium. 2. In the original review in 1977, it appears that several points may have not been adequately addressed. First , a minimum of a 100 foot setback is required from any other developed lot which is zoned residential . The Honeydew Elementary School site to the south is zoned GS-1. The property was annexed in July of 1959 and given a GS-1 zoning classification , even though the school was pre-existing on the site. In 1965 , the Comprehensive Plan designated the site into a Public/Quasi-Public Land Use Classification. The site was never rezoned to P-1 because there was never any reason to. The school was already existing. The G zone is still a residential zone. However, in this particular case, it is not developed with residences. Therefore, it is not seen as a requirement in the opinion of the Planning Department . Secondly, the Hearing Examiner in 1977 approved the build- ing location only 18 feet from the southern property line. Section. 4-706( 3)( a)4. requires a 25-foot landscaping strip along all property lines. It would appear that this is a code requirement that the Hearing Examiner may not have had the authority to modify. However, a building permit has been issued on the site for the construction of a church as originally allowed, and it would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback. 3. The site plan complies with the other requirements as designated in Section 4-706( 3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern property line. It will have to be set back 25 feet instead of the 18 feet shown. This will reduce the parking by 4. However, the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces. The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans . Therefore, the parking required still remains the same, 90 parking spaces. 4. The church construction has been divided into three phases. Phase 1 is presently under construction. It is composed of the multi-purpose room/gymnasium. It complies totally with the special permit issued in 1977. Phases 2 and 3 include the sanctuary and the foyer. These are intended to be extended to the west of the original building site. The structure was moved to the west because the exterior treatment of the building was upgraded to cedar finish instead of metal and to allow better access for fire fighting. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965, Objectives, pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not Pave a direct impact on the property. However, subsequent •evel- opment will remove the soils, disturbing the vegetatio increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on tra fic and noise level in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, many of these impact•. can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not applicable. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Development of the subject site as a church w 11 provide increased opportunity for social interaction within the area congregation. 5. Traffic : Data on average daily trips (ADT' s) is not available for churches from the Traffic Engineering Di i- sion. Therefore, given an estimate of two trips/week/ parking space, a total of 180 trips/week would result (based on 90 required stalls) . It should be noted, ho - ever, that these trips will all occur at the same time . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTLTHRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance aid the State Environmental Policy Act of 1972 , as amended, RC 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposals (see attached) . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 6 . City of Renton Police Department 7. City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1. The proposed rezone from G to SR-1 is consistent with 'he land use element of the Comprehensive Plan, which desi:,- nates the site and surrounding area as single family r:si- dential. 2. The subject site was annexed in 1976. Since that time no area-wide or site rezoning requests have been considered on the site. 3f Items 1 and 2 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 of she Renton Municipal Code, thus substantiating the propose rezone. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone from G to SR-1 based upon the compatibility of the proposed use with existing uses and t e fact that the site has not been previously considered by a area-wide zoning review, and being consistent with the Com.re- hensive Plan land use element designation of single family residential. ,...-, . I ' 71t;r:Q rg--7 -7777:1-''' 1 0 , 41 ''' I 1. 1 :.1 a „....----_,---,• :1------------- ,. R-6"'"a 2CI )1,,,.:- "'.--. ,...I Z.------ • R- E -3g'-i Ii.,y1-1: -.:: •_--1=om,g..... , Atoo..,,-; I.,• i, . . ,,. .,...._,......_ "1/ ,. .,,_, i . -, ''N.k.,N 1:1_1 .• 1 Le - 0-------.7.7'-'''''. • ' ..... 3, c..... 1 •k*. 1 B .. ._ _ • : ,.....,„ A 8.2 4.0,.. „ill 1• ‘., ., 5.....•.a-...... I'''.,,N,N,, esc•-%•,-P., aro l _ s i,'zx'..;•&• *- °_ist •••;-_tif,i. '-} :1 ."I -•t•- •---I t•.-- t ' a • - I r r () . 0,...„ .r. ,., . -.„ • ,___,____ ,. ... _ g.„,„,_____11.- B.,0.1, , '''''''4='22* 1„1 % , ,..' 111 I.• = ..... -. ,, ...,,I. ,"-r* * ...,l'tq.4. i ......4.,... 0,--- , t!1 . .• -,,,,, s-v. :ki_..,..)- ...-,, , ,1.........:L.4 • ..• !....1 `A..;- ,., •\:7".2,-...!--.7.-!..1"4-,-.-4, P.....-.1"4„ ,' ..... .1_ . , .. , . ... • ,. -- . .,.. " , .:,....11 . G. ‘ ..%--0,. .,,,i i .uti , 8 il .............2.'_•._12.,_._.) '.11--":-.7... ; R I. -I" •.\44--.,. -- -.---- - I, -:t..,..17".:"‘.. .tI..' -' ., ; 1,,•• L-":1-••1.4 ' . •••••. '5 \ '4i i li • . .', :7 ...4 . • ; ..4 ..-...7. III ; ...g.sr f.,...,1..!„.:1 ,, .. . • ...1'''',.. !i ..:*‘' •.i • 1. -•--.^.- t;., :1 A_L,":, ''.'..3 -1.... ',1.4•L...11 I s'il';'"•'....': • . 1 0 i Vata ' r 1 ...;1_,.• ,S'zt . p§, • •••'IVO).t•-Ir'-'11-."'X.'. '""'l .;,‘‘,. --) I:"k\::. ..-rt'"! :','' '.:..5-..-,71.• Lor,..$9- -; - • G - • ii . .3-•,-•- • '.0.4-•:-• ,•,•••i•- ,- F• % ',.. •-A,,•1 --.0-15, ,.-T-yort,1,3- •0171.1 44 I ;'-'1:' '1 I.•;*. .'•.•..'`.1..!,:!..I viA-t-l_!.- . 1 o..!...,. ,.......-c•I kt:,,,,,,,v,ff,. t ( .i ' '''1 1 , ' ,P,,,,i, , . ..2.v.r 1-40,:,.. , ;e,,,. , 2,, : .a,-1 ''. '.st,,.:( •it # 1 'Ph..- ii, . . .4, „"--1,11:-.-1 i- '•It.:14.-3.,r --.,\':\-, It-...ir,',E?2,'-:_t_-st. t•t/.., :'V. j:.i t,.I.).'4, 1 '', - I .,-.7---,..2-............c; . •••••t- !-:L.!• ,,c. .-1--L,,,.. , .1w5,1'..k,,,,,, •1 L-.1••••i-o---.• IR..= Ii! •.t..L............2 ;, . ,..._, ..;-•, !,,ft.F: .I i;, l' t%p,•••••;•-':,..k. -.,- .---g :r .-1,;•••-; •-••----- 2 r'L.,:„. ,. ,..___ ...,:,0'-`t.-f,-,,t.1-,-1,-1- .7.,,,',.',,.1,1,,,I, ..r, . .1,,,;`..--1:; :: `4s,' , , • ii 1 ' 1.,1 .i.,•-.1 • : -, • ..,..._ I,. ',..s.t.,..i....1...-, : ....,;.fo...•.'.• I I f I I . 't ' t'-' I.; , ,•..4% N, ''. •-r, .••••0-,1-• ..'1,I• .7. si..1"!"14' ', i . . -i• , , _ '',...I ..-0.1.7•1 - P•••/..t.'!: •Z*11.•,.."Ii ,.„,......•,,,,,,,,, ;vs'.y !''•••••'""•••1 • '..",.._,.' o. . ....-al.... ...Lio.: ...._.) k-, • , 1 I "1• le 0111,...t1• .',.1,,:.„.-1,79,-.vr„.s........_...,‘.....r.,.,1 , % 1.1 ' .%, .1 6r9 . .1 , 1- J 4.„. --_,.4 •,,,,..j 1.'..1:1°.....INL,Al\ '',• ‘. ..,--2..1°I..,_:;!...1.2...L..-...• •...... ...--;,.. ' •• • • - • • • -1 f.:_. r. • , t, • --7711-1 ', i:.__•2.1Li.-.....'•.!:_l 11:-..:i...?„-'1''',"• 1.•.• •••'r..v.t. 1I. ...•..........,,. . •..Yzr.-so,o17,f, ......7 k.,..i.c7)i T.1 : ' .1 • •10.4)-,1,...;','.. r - , . , --,,,•qacorazz, '; 0 . ..roo, ..o Sait,a , • SIP . 1 • '\\..1 •;-1 ' 1 ' 4.,,.N.., r• 4..- 1..; L 2' , . L .•• , :1 .r .,.,..,__ ____T ..„......,•%i;,,,,, ...._?,,,_,__,.../ .:,. .S R...1 1.,2°- ..._ .,..; v? ri .,-...1•Iv..-t;..t-'4.: - 4• . 11 1 .•__•,•_,_, :,., ‘.... v ,. , ....._,• I.\:.‘ 4,* 4 - . . _A ; Z ti ,...a.1 .W. :*.(.1.•t.f..:1 ;:i...1 ir!`'f.. ..•1- :•P'IL7.37° P'*1 : II . ''..: W.' WI •rr 1 rt.". . . i•_---7-w,, ,,:),\.,-.v.-,4 t......_.•,:i• .4,.,_ :,...3„::::I,-„.-.,../ _ , ._, , , . (L.:0s ..,....,i -, -i , • • fri.-‘, . ; l ..... , . ........,.....0.•. , ....,..1t. a I , ,_,,E 4. . EZ•1,. . ._I, o• ; ,I • 1' i .../.1.1/ I ' .r. ,u ...4==.**ED.(91........ ...:2130.==. ! ...,,..,..,is.,.. ,,, i •• ..:•-----------,---*. '-• . r.c 1 ' ' • t•)' 7 -4'1--) : 1 • ° • I I i (1.1'..- •: 1 ! ••• ..,..,'..1..-11-i-..-1- - •.:: ... ''•i .*:. 1 `.. •"•' ..-7"-I'..iI 4'1-G-7e.,r,0 0 ..1-. •._.,•.,..'.-. '._....,..,'; _ _ ,_____; --r-.. '-'7..,f_.,a,..4.,' - ' ' 1-r• i . • ...1,0_,,c,:...,, „,.r,„ i 1...7,,, 11:1,,3 4,r•',4"4! . • A -----N,E .'''',----1---T-!---r-.•"' r i‘.•••.'-.'': ;.1 1/4.-•••.!....._.q.'..1 p•coti . „ ,,r...,,,, . :i,.,;._1 l•, _.. .1,._‘,1 - _.ri . -- • • 4 " I ! : ' I. ') ..,, .0 e 1 I...,4.(;1....1.":41"'; ; T ! --),2.I I' • 1 -4---• --• g2.- • 1 , . - \ 1 . . ,• r- ---11-° . .. I .. .-,..Vit. R...1 .............„,.............„........„,......._..ft.....4:,,,,,I...r.,,, , ,. 14.::I ) ,r, , . i II", =z_171 .2-'-41'1*.: J 0 4.11.t.i - F..1-....,-,..„,....,,i 1 41' .1 ''''''--- •- • - • . - •-•••• -- 1,;> -- 1 ,..•:°iT' : °•I ' ° f r% .`° .--' 11 r ;‘•-.5--.1-5"-'*••-• ''••• -..,; .-3>•l'••.•.1'---,:••: 3 ...•; • .%- zl' • *L-.-- - l' ..:,:•:.Y.,',•••••:,.,. .• 1% IR".J., L--1 f$ ..46:--,-iy.; • LI 111011.4 r',.: %.1':'•. 1,4 a-1' ..1 .. '--4 :'.•;•:1 ;‘; ,','. „.. _„_,-.....:.: 1 .• - _ _ ' . r 1.2 l't'ITTlii-rt•--:v4.71-‘4f") r--'7''''.. 1 1•asn; r i •T‘ :-. i'll:::,;i:la .-','''''''' ..'....`i1..;•- ,„..„ ...,......„ ,,... .......,,....... ,4 ••••• . • ...; ,. •••.• --,-.•::::5:11...,21-...:...1.•r_ii•zr.;•1 1•_.°1__.7!"-s..• 1....! L.°...!).1 •••!...1_1 i. i 1 : L Liti.4-1,T 1 'Tti,1 i , F- - . 1 - ' _.•il ' r lit ', t _,,,••' . _ . ,.,m....-P,) r- •ii. I . . _.... . • 6,b-,, -1 .• , . .f,1 1.. 1 -- t----1 IcZ-3 ' eir- R-3 • 1 i ; • ; . 1 ,: • 1 , , , . ... . ._ . _ . . • d : ....-1, I ------, t ' •,-_,.7., i , : • I_,„,) tr ..1 I. 1 1 !: • I , r: ,s .. --i-ii • . . „„,„.... , - , , p _1_ ..4 ' ..,, • t - 1 ' ' -4, err; 2 . i .1 I I 1 I V71-. ..--1 . . I i•; • / _i i ; I 1 V yl. ..0' • i J . I ..,„ .1. ___J --4.4''''''''''' 1...... , 1 REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT: ' FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE . 1 . ! .., ow.' ........ - ....••••,....,.........0••••••1==•=,,,, ••••••••••••-nes,••••-••••••=,==....,=========m2====r-....,.....mer.ar.n--..0===.../.==.7,-* ix. ' 1 APPLICANT FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE TOTAL AREA ±6. 5 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Union Avenue N.E, EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District , EXISTING USE One single family residence/undeveloped. _ PROPOSED USE Expansion of a church and ass9ciated educational 1 facilities. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential 1 I . ., . COMMENTS 1 ; • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FIVE 5. A revised landscape 'plan has not been submitted. Howe er, care should be taken to insure that proper screening i . required to reduce the visual impact . The church has been set back the same distance from Union Avenue N.E. as the Honeydew Elementary School to be compatible wit( the school instead of dominating that side of the street. 6. Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees e ist on the site from the house eastward to the property lice. Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan. 7. A screen fence was suggested as a possible addition along the northerly landscape strip; however, proper/ landsc.p- ing will be more effective than a fence. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested special permit , file number SP-4 ;3-79, subject to the following conditions : 1. Revision of the landscaping strip on the southern boun.ary of the rear parking to a width of 25 feet. 2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plans including the revisions noted in "L" and the retention of existing trees wherever possible. Removal of trees shall be subject to prior approval of the Renton Planning Department in accordance with detailed landscape plans. 3. Final Planning Department approval of screening method- along the north and south property lines. 4. Posting of a bond or other approved means of insuring proper landscaping installation and maintenance as per ordinance requirements. 5. Parking lot lighting shall be of low height and intensity to reduce glare and light intrusion to adjacent single family .residence. /ODT 6. Exterior loud speakers shallAbe permitted. 7. The portion of the site not developed at this time shall be retained in its natural state, and any future plans for this area shall be approved by the Examiner. The purpose of these requirements is to reduce the impact of th- proposed development in the adjacent single family residences and retain the general character of the area. ; -_-'-'•„!-,..,_:-..k.„ • ,..., . -- I . i 1 I 1 ' •• I - . I 1 . • 1 • . .I . . .._ . . . . , . • _ . . . . • . r i • . .. _ • . . • ' • • .0 iF.:•:.*::: 1 ' , :!:'•• . 1 ! . . .,., . ... •_,...,-.:..-• . - .' i..r. .__. 1 11 . -... ., , , , ----- • - ' i i- '—'.•. --- i ;- ' 1 I, . . ..- ,•,,, ,-., •-..--:, - -- , , ,,... -- r-..-:1 ,,,. 1 . • . - • - r i • t,.. .. . . • . . \• --- ,...' - ' .,.,. . 11_..:_ ________ID 1,,,...• , ! ,.. ;17. Lt---(7.11:.-----.77-2 ... • II 7 7... - • % ril-:-...:-.f--- . , .. , / • ! .. , . • II , 1, •s'' '/' 1. • .. .. • ; r,, / '- -. 1... 1flil s E a ---i:=.HA SE 3 . • •, - _ . ... . . . • i : ,t.-.i. I: •I •• • • ':: •r• • ... „..... ..... .,.,.. • • . " • . . . ,..,:____, • 1 „:• •; , ,_ • • . -- . • • • • .. , • . - .. •J. . ... . .- .... . .1 . • • . . era coeossreucrxw•J ... .• .- . ; . , . I:2 ,.• , .... ... . , , ... , .. . - . • . . . .g • -, 1'i 'I _ . 7 '• _ _ .. , ,.. _ . , • !... -) -, -• . _ . ••• .' .... ,. . . ._ .- • ... ., ‘,...... ...,,...... , . ...„ . . , . . . ••-•'. r • . i ,' • . • i ::::.,. • ' ,-. .• _, ,._ — i :-,'7.:- , • .. . - --- - - • i • ':'• • . _ —.- - .,_ • • . , . . e.,4:; :. •. , ... .. ,..• . ... [ " . ... • . • !_-:•„--!-•—•=:_-•'-'°-----2_-:::_. __ .._... I -7:::•:-. •••', ' • . . __ _ _ _ Si— ._ ...., __________A - : •,, . 1 .... .,, • . , t... .., ,a frit _ S 0 0 7 7 . . s-p- q 33 7 5 i A. , . • , r , . .1 ji ''''a geladOe _... . • • • • . .. _ ..... t3L,-CC 17 -c1,5 1:-chts-av 7 yr/ -.0 iv--xingo -1-5'211:g • =I oa7 9 gli/95 i a i El : ti I_ 1 , ... \)% o ! ,t 1 0 1 0 ! i t , 0‘6‘‘ _!..... I i_ 4 a '1171 ' g c.bi5S a li% 1. . E3 ii r:3 klir-- n4furat,„ ', ; a= ca arzz,czz$47.7..7:11 0 W.:79 0 eZr.rfa()cm=o csazi-D CI(0.7.1.."Z CP Crff""XD 0=..D 0 C '0 4:1=13 0 :i on)I A J./ . Z es.. 11 i j ] 142te.a9vivg112 mel 'LIMO ' i• 11 . ..........____. „... vl, ,66 •01.7.1# 7 Z-7, • . : -'• .' :•'• • : ., :. . •••1).s.:d,,,,04,10,e,04 :: ..: . . ' -::•• 0 ,..;;:. ' c: :, :, :::',.'.;•....,,,,,,•!:.-1-„,...;•,:=4 ' 0 duvikiro..„„4 g. : , .. : stlikA. To C._ MI= Ca, cr2m,al ea.= rj calm 0 cear,a 0 0=1)0 cram cg, 0 a= ,,amo ez, =cm cay eaco c2, , c ca2) co e...= c_liWil .A.).-19 ,E9S 'gal'z ti %IS'S ...TS 0 1 0 . .5, Zr,1 go eij111 0 '45 I 'f)5 _ 046)11 ,0,9to i El 0 , : 1 i4""M ED Cr72.7P en ez=co ex=m ...=co Gm=c•D clauz,a) czar) . _ ........7, • I:I 1 o . 1LD , (007,1g - 9 0 1 ! . 1 0 , 1121.9111...,19-in, rill i u o ! toot 0 ....L._...: .... _ ,......._,....... ..1-5 t'LL 0 1 "V IV , --- „....i L , ,„ 0 yi' , , ° DOEILIE1 'EMEIDOOODEID . . , 41°A,I.1 !0:::, 4,-:: ... _ 171 ri n BY 5:UU PM ON t®y,V( '7J -�-. , . . REVIEWING, DEPARTMENT; VISION :____-____71-e..;- /Iri:/j c , l=^ /L.Y•2__./LPL. Z- /'/A'c', ___4_Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved . ,.) ...-----)) /l ✓L '� �, ''�ti:� � 0---- � /0 %/? Signature of Director or Authorized Represe tative Date __nrfTcuTtla nPp,gRTMF.NT/DIV SION REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks and Recreation Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap proved • c- RE V I LW INV DEPARTMENT/DIVIS ION : -�__- Oje — = __ -_-----________ Approved __Approved with conditions Not Approved (10 • .,:,,,,..._______,.) • v • /62:7_if Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da- e REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :___.-..____..___-_________ --- -- _-_Approved __ _ Approved with conditions Not Approved - inature o f DireEior o►-Au -i ti orized I e-. •es e a nttive ------- Date ,g ?Alton Planning Department • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 4 -- (I $ ' ®, �.�� ' ;�� ielekwkfr(JiA' ¢ mdr dto,__AlLyz SR a 41 -SE ` _ fLocation : 2 oa e3 lr- a _ Applicant . t f.:2 - --_ TO : Parks Department p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:jam /7 ?. Police Department A, R. c, f1E.EI ING. / 4 • Public Works Department Engineering Division • Traffic Engineering • 1�''3iUilding Division - Utilities Engineering r Fire Departr„ent • • co IEN'S OP SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS nj �P ArP I CAT ION SHOULD zOV I DE D IN W I Ij'IG OR THE APPLICATION REVI •.I1 COI�IF�-"ENCI: (ARC) 1 () HI- HELD ON r •: `? �� Al 9 :0)0 AM IN� I HL THIRD FLOOR CoNI--I-.IE�,cE I�Ui�% 1F YOUR DEPARTI.1ENT/I)I VI S I ON I:i'RESNNTAT I VI: WILL NOT BE ABLE: TO ATTEND�T ARCS P AS E PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE [TANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ' PM 7? REVIEWING DEPARTMENT!DIVISION : /q_ o ( -- �� Approved Approved With conditions • Not Approved • //// ( C� /1/ Sicnaturc of Director or Authorized 'f?epresentative Date REVILItING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _Approved A Approved with conditions Not Approve( (� 51) UUU • • / _161/4 / � ic.n tllr.? 01 Director or Authnri ;'on 1.01.1'e`,c'nuati4(e Date — VICL;, I ';G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved . ,gyp rov 'd with cook: '1 tl ons Not Approved PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE R-434-79 Application No . SP-435-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-514-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal -Rezone of 6. 5 acres from "G" to "SR-1" and expansion of church facilities by 6 ,800 square feet . Proponent FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE • Location of Proposal 850 Union Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to li have ED not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is Dx is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and Policies. 2. Meets all mitigating measures of Zoning Ordinance. • • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the led agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offi ial David R. Clemens Title S n ' r Planne Date November 9 , 1979 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • . 0 IL__ ...... . . ...... 4" ..„."-- ,,,o (t,.. , , • .f, . :,151.k 9) ,\(\\\6 —I I ell% . -, .: . ,_ . • . ../=K2 0 CND el ar ; 9A1 . r!....:, ECI cArx %% : % • 0 dm Do4iii Is ! coit 9 . , , 4 stoim A Vg& • e a arcs ea caw 4111 CIS 0 a co MD 0 CZ=0 CUD co er,Fiv 0=az)a ,,..E. 0 cgrr)o alma a a= 0 ce2Z)0 ema 0 14 5..iitil7 ilt..ti, ' . . . Z 5—i--1, I ca 5 47). -rootro Z 1‘71,M05179111 ma! ASIA Vii LI 1:b i 4 .......... VI% "—I ' • K. :.:•.'•-:...:.•"'":.*:'i'::i;•...;::;::,.. ,:i .::•',!:i:,':::'..li::!... .:.;F i;:.:::...:::i '::;:::.:.':':i.:::IN.!lii::MI'i'k: ..':;: ::;::H:;:.::-A."W:.i.il:i i.::. .pa,w+ . -1,• .,....•-•-•.'''''.':.'"'"'"""•:..' ':'::::.:: „,!.'i,x,'•:'iai:'t._,,,..":.•'.i-':i:;:::i .:i::P. ';: :.::;:c' %,, r. i:i....1 :;.'::...::.:::::.i: :'::: ;:i'.:.:!:f i:i&:..,:;:':•;•.i;i:i.:,' ,'.::::.::::;..•g]i:.::.;:..::!:•i',,,,,.''..:.:::"..u,„,::•.:'L-',;,i a.0,,,''::'.":'.:'i;::':a g A.::.:i!i;.';;:ai:: : ;::.f..AW!N 412,41g:: :!:M.i,:;:'041!.:4 ,11%4;i;,;:tigi:i, 4" °I. ':','''' .'::-..'i"..::'.::.::'::.,:::'::;,:f;:i ...:4;n:i;i9.••••.i..:g,. :'......,t.::,:L'':',_;.;•:457‘rk,,,T, I.:';:';_ i„.A.::V4::..i.'','Ri..g a:g.'igiSt4.4000..;'• aIliiiitt;r:... 7ti:4'::::' at - .. : ....:'..:::.- • ..:..'::....i:....i. i':::...'.::.,:5:.':i,.;.::....ttu.:!,7.4.4-1::::.:,;icA,,.vo• , . ,. .,.;:;:•: ciaba.,.. . ;.;;;„;!,.:1;:i,::.,..„ s...:, .,..,;.::: N:. p. .i. . • .' • •• . •:. • . ::-.::,:',1.1::...: •:;. it;xi .4,i' '‘,.. ii, ':::']1:50P.A116119:•: . : ...::. ii.. ...(::,.... i, Li ,r,J mom fro ezzir 0 gam A =ma OP C=D el1 GB=10 Jan Ca C:10 Co C13=2 °3 irreht t.4: 00 02320.28 4 a alig)ID ammo el"" 1111 "lip a'Cele :14 Sul Ai:Q ' • a • I t . ! b ; vssit rapo . ..s. 0 •e5 ---J *AI *Cs 0. • ',gm/ loolif , 0 0 • imin G2 cm. CI C=120 CD CISIZD 0=lb 0=Zile) 0=2 ao c=s al 1 ' — i.e ., . .1 g I a S 49 . 0 0 • , id, tr a e` 1 0 1 ! I 0 0 1 0 40),f,V 1 - -.,,, 0...., 0 a3 1... ,,,,-J. : 1 • ; 01 CS= CD P 1 0 0 , (11;1 Pc° C:3 0 11on LI : G:1 c:::1 ' ri ; 0 —1 a • ' , iti.04,- '5 1V L azug CD 0 co_cri,:im co 6,f+JOr:V NVig,;40,4 • •V q X ! D C33 00000000 0 { o0000 4...,.... . , 1 CI '._J o non no El ..- • 7----ji 'r=1---7-/-\-77,1-- ''' ' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Vaire , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the l day of � �r��- � , 19-r\ , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this a \ day of 19-r\ . Notary Public in and 'for the State of Washington, residing at, Renton Application, Petition or Case: / ` T17-7 / ST- ci$ • (The mLnute4 contain a Wt 06 the panti.e,A ob neeond) R-434-79 + SP-433-79 Page Two Mr. Blaylock responded that a building permit had been issued and the building is now under construction. He stated there is a possibility variances for ad- dition to the church will be sought. The Examiner replied he thought a variance might be appropriate, but he, did not have the power to rule and the Board of Adjustment would be the proper authority. Mr. Blaylock requested information as to whether this would be considered a completely new application or would just be an expansion of the church. The Examiner responded that it was his belief that the applicant had chosen not to exercise the previous special permit and is ap- plying for a new permit. He stated that the previous special permit had not been approved by the City Council and that this approval is necessary. The Examiner inquired as to the size of the lot if the applicant complies with set- backs on the east side. Mr. Blaylock responded that it would be approximately 50 to 60% of the remaining portion of the lot. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Lowell Welker 6906 So. 129th Place Seattle, Washington 98178 Mr. Welker, Pastor of the church and president of the corporation, stated that there are unique problems with the lot dimensions. The total lot is 218 feet while it is 1280 feet in depth. In 1977 when the special permit was taken out, the church discovered that there was a 100 foot setback that applies only to churches. On the property to the north there is only one residence that is at all visible and that is on Union Avenue. The rest is a virtual jungle out in the county. Because there are two small dwellings, it is considered residential land and requires the church to set back 100 feet. In this event, only 18 feet would be left on which to build. In 1977 the church had intended to build a steel structure, a square box with a flat roof, but felt it was not attractive and they would not be satis- fied with that type of structure. Also, the original plan did not meet the current requirements for ramps for handicapped people. It was discovered that the redesigning of the steel building would have cost as much as the price of a new design. There was a request from the Fire Dept. that the building be moved forward in order that they could more adequately service the building. The church and the school are in the city and the rest of the property on Union is in the county. The Examiner responded that, according to the provisions of code, Section 4-706(3) a. 3 and 4, setback and landscaping requirements, he does not have the ability to vary requirements and that would have to be done through a variance by the Board of Adjustment. He stated that he may be able to issue a special permit subject to the approval of a variance by the board and also subject to final approval of the proposal by the City Council. Mr. Welker referred to a letter to the Hearing Examiner which stated that the reason they have gone to a rezone is because the area is residential and, should they desire to develop it in the future, it would be easier to take care of both at one time. The Examiner requested testimony in support. Responding was: Robert Zanoni • 508 West Main Auburn, Washington 98002 Mr. Zanoni stated that he is in support of the application as builder of the project. The Examiner requested further testimony in opposition. There was none and there were no further comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Welker remarked that when the original permit was' issued there was no opposition from neighbors or the community and that the neighbors have seen the building and are much more pleased. The hearing was closed 'at. 9:40 a.m. • November 21, 1979 • • OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON • • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: First Church of the Nazarene FILE NO. R-4:4-79, SP-?33-79 • LOCATION: Vicinity of 850 Union Avenue N.E. , just north of Honeyd-w Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from'GS-1 to SR 1 and a special permit to construct a church and associated edu ational facilities. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of rezone; approval of .s•ecial RECOMMENDATION: permit with conditions. Hearing Examiner: Approval of rezone; denial of special permit. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: . Examiner on November 9, 1979. • • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the, Planning Department report, examini g available information on file with •the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examine' conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: • • The hearing was opened on October 30, 1979. Responding to the applicant's reques for • additional time to prepare final elevation plans and drawings, the Examiner conti' ued the hearing until November 13, 1979. • CONTINUANCE: • The hearing was opened •on November 13; 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the followin• additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map • Exhibit #3: Site Plan • Exhibit #4: Letter from Fire Chief to Pastor • Lowell Welker dated August 23, 1979 Mr. Blaylock corrected the following errors in Exhibit #1: Page 5, Section M. , -6 should read: "Exterior loud speakers shall hot be permitted". He also correcte4' Section I, line. 2 on page 3, Population/Employment .to read: "It could impact with development of the eastern portion of the site. This will be estimated. at tie time subdivision is presented." The letter from the Fire Chief to Pastor Lowell Welker was read by Mr. Blaylock. The Examiner requested information as to whether. there is a single family home on the lot at the present time that is 100 feet from the church. Mr. Blaylock advised that the home is occupied by the associate minister and is considered to be a parsonage. • The Examiner asked,for clarification as to whether a special permit had been • applied for, stating appeared that the applicant is not working under the special permit already approved and that.new conditions would be different. R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Four 14. Churches meeting certain enumerated requirements are permitted by special permit in residential, including single family zone, districts (Section 4-706 (3) ) . Among those requirements is a setback of 100 feet from all developed property which is located in residential zones; 25 feet of landscaping along all non-right-of-way property lines; parking not less than 25 feet from developed residential lots; and adequate provision for proper traffic flow and circulation (Section 4-706(3) (a)3, 4, 5 and 8 respectively) . 15. The applicant proposes instead an 18 foot setback from the Honeydew School site to the south; similarly only 18 feet of landscaping; and parking stalls less than 25 feet from a residential lot are to be provided. In addition, there has been no provision left for access to the rear portion of the lot which the applicant proposes to develop separately. Access as presented in the site plans (Exhibit #3) would have to be through the parking area and under a covered drive immediately adjacent to the church. 16. The Planning Department report (Section A; Summary) identifies the zone as G whereas the site is presently zoned GS-1. CONCLUSIONS: REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Com- prehensive Plan; or c. There has been demonstrated changes in the development pattern in the area since the last rezoning action. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria to permit the rezone of the subject property has been met. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located for single family development. The applicant proposes to use the property for a combination of purposes, including the eventual construction of single family homes on part of the site, and the construction of a church on the remainder of the site. Under terms of the zoning code, churches may be established in single family re- sidential zones by special permit and therefore, both proposed uses may be per- missable under the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Adjoining zoning districts in the vicinity are a mix of densities and the proposed classification, SR-1, would be. compatible with these surrounding zones. To the west is another small SR-1 zone and an R-1 (Single Family, 7,200. square foot lot size) zone. There is also a G-7200 (Single Family; 7,200 square foot lot size) zone just south of Honeydew Elementary School. 4. The area has been the site of recent developments along Union Avenue NE and the proposed change of zoning classification to SR-1 would be appropriate at this time. Preliminary Hearing Examiner approval of a rezone, also to SR-1, and of a subdivision just north of Kiwanis Park has occurred within the last six months. 5. The area is serviced by both water and sewer and therefore, the potential development will not impact city services or the public health or welfare and the rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 should be approved. SPECIAL PERMIT 6. The applicant for a special permit must demonstrate that the proposal is in compliance with the provisions of the zoning code authorizing the issuance of a special permit. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed church complies with the various landscape, setback, and parking requirements of Section 4-706 (3) (a) . The plans, in fact, demonstrate that the proposal fails to satisfy these requirements. • R-434-79 • SP-433-79 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: ' Having reviewed the record in this matte , the Examiner now makes and enters the following: • FINDINGS: • 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of ±6.5 acres 'of property fr.m GS-1 (General; Single Family Residential; 35,000 square foot lot size) to SR-1 (Single Family Residential; 7,500 square foot lot size) and. approval of a special • permit to permit the construction of a church on the reclassified (SR-1) . site. 2.' The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, (is uncontested) , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in thi- report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Enviro ental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a. Declaration of Non-Signific.nce has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible o ficial. 4. Plan's for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. • 7. The subject property is located in the Highlands section of the city. The su.ject parcel is ±218 'feet wide by ±1,278 feet deep. The site is generally level. he • front portion Of the subject site has generally been cleared for building pur..ses. The rear portion of the site has mixed stands of conifers and deciduous trees. 8. The subject site was 'annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 3058 in August of 1976, and the present zoning classification was applied at that time. On March 29, 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special-permit to permit the construction of . church on the subject site. On November 5, 1979, a building permit was issue. for one phase of construction. The special permit was not approved by the City Council as required by Sectio 4-706 (3) and the setbacks and landscaping required by Section 4-706 (3) (a) 3 'and 4 weae not complied with. 9. The applicant proposes developing a church on the portion of the property fro ting on Union. Avenue NE. The remainder of the parcel would eventually be developed w th ' single family residences. 10. Currently construction of a foundation for a proposed gymnasium is underway. The site is also occupied by an existing residence and a temporary structure used as an office for Overseeing the various construction projects. The existing reside ce is proposed to be used by the church as a parsonage. • 11. The site is bounded on the south by the Honeydew Elementary School which is located in the same GS-1 zone as the subject site. The northern boundary of .the subject site is also the boundary for the .city limits. The property to the north is zoned for single family residential use and a single family home is located on the adjoining site to the north. 'Across Union Avenue NE, to the west, the property is zoned S-1 (Single Family 40,000_ square foot lot size) , SR-1, and R-1 (Single Family, 7,200 square foot lot si e) . 12. Traffic counts have not been derived for church' related activities, but estim..tes based On square footage, seating capacity and required parking indicate that attendance at services would generate a minimum of approximately 180 trips pe week (based on the required 90 parking stalls) . , 13. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is 1 Gated as suitable for the development of single family residences. • Established lot size in the area varies from large multi-acre sites to the more • common range.' between 7,200 square feet and 15,000 square feet. • • • . R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Six Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 5, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Five 7. The church building will be located within 18 feet of the Honeydew Elementary School property, which is located in the same GS-1 residentially zoned and developed lot as the proposed church (Section 4-706(3) (a)3) . 8. Also the landscaping and parking as proposed will not meet the requirements of the zoning code. There will be only 18 feet of landscaping on the site along the south property line adjoining the Honeydew site and parking is proposed to be developed also within 18 feet of the property line. Both features violate the requirements of the zoning code (Section 4-706(3) (a) 4 and 5) . 4 9. The proposed development of the eastern (internal) portion of the site with ' single family residences will create potential traffic access and safety problems. Currently there is no access to the rear portion of the subject property withcut first passing through the site of the proposed church and passing under a covered drive immediately adjacent to the church building. Section 4-706(3) (a)8 requires provision for both actual and anticipated traffic and access problems. The present site development plans would create a landlocked parcel surrounded by large parcels in separate ownership to the north and east, and a large school site to the south. Access through the front portion of the site would be circuitous and hazardous. 10. While the parcel is relatively large, it, is too narrow to support the construction of the proposed church. The parcel is only about 218 feet wide. The zoning code, in deference to single family zoned land, requires an expansive 100 feet of setback between proposed churches and single family zoned and developed lots. This re- quires a total setback of 200 feet if adjoining lots on both sides are zoned residential and developed. The subject proposal requires under this provision 200 feet of setback, leaving 18 feet of building space. There is a single family home developed north of the subject property in a King County residential zone and the Honeydew Elementary School developed in a GS-1 residential site immediately south of the subject proposal. The code does not exempt non-residential development from these provisions. 11. Similarly, the proposal cannot comply with the landscape and parking requirements because of the lot size, again providing only 18 feet for parking setback and landscaping. 12. The zoning code does not authorize nor permit the examiner to deviate from the enumerated requirements and therefore the special permit should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: The reclassification of the subject property from GS-1 to SR-1 should be approved: The special permit should be denied. ORDERED THIS 21st day of November, 1979. 414-4( . • Fred J. Ka man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of November, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Lowell Welker, 6906 So. 129th Place', Seattle, WA 98178 Robert Zanoni, 508 West Main, Auburn, WA 98002 TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of November, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti . Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney .0,..7.J.. ' !77..1 (......i ' L....a i. _1,1 Lel Li ( 4? Li ---43 ,: P. Iiii---4 1 11 , .........._1 ,1 . c) I 1 njo D 0 EI 171) [E3 0 0 0 EA 0 0 D IP g El ° 1 ..4.0 ' ' .1.--'--"" em ec,.. z .I 4)6,tilr. 4 19 DO 13 t 'ZrP r U. At g. /0 rig .5-r. . , . . 0 i , n =hp CD To.t -,—......E_.D • 17 TI ....... nga1o3) 6.7 v P.co • as1 — , . =T 11m4n2) ., ...‘ lip at, • 6 B 0 „,,,,„ ,....., 0 5.F. S.F. sg p. .F. i S.F. I/660 alba 0 03 0 5.F. 5.1. s.c. Li fi u 1 . e,iy _imi-r a= 7.315 Si it et arms at (Inca 49:0 Fit.7:62 0 MO CI22160 CO 0:=1 CO azomo co camp 41. azio es awe ea am= . sump di, atm in, li•il Ex. n pleitdrioulat? 1I • .9.F.Etarick- 28-1 1-PliASE . ' I ,----- Pt145 ttr" fraaith.VIO t0441' a -63 ca;Pad iSfrt1D-Ct ... Vet __../.... ......-..... f 41 t alO•Pal ‘....--"---"-l....-....r. I klA 1 -------------- ------------------- -"•-•••••- :, 8 %"-e.1 i ..-,,,0 q jeldtAff:Pecvrt\--:47 , 11 oil , ....,. 14............,S tiry Lhuir, . r... ....-,(..... mu 0 c„, ocr:_p 3 0 ,,,,,..va e,,,,,CO CZ:n a e:7:C)0 etlaai73 C))eaz.,--:•.:s fa er e:-• o crzLe ez ar.,. ea atza ct at=c c:.= en etzr.4 0 1160, L__ ___ , ,rea.„•.,,,,, m „ c„ t 1 t I M‘a 1 i: {-1 . .,, • k%1 no i V ...•.... . 1,. : , la nk 0 ) 0E09 0 iceso. . a scAL6 , 5uejtior Yileg D Fig.sr eiquAcil oF/44,z.Air-Mit SP- Li 33-71 ' . , . . OF R.4-,A .p 0 •THE CITY OF RENTON q, 4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 090 co.P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9' SEP1°.1% November 30, 1919 TO: Parties of Record FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: File No. R-434-79; SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene Correction of Clerical Error With reference to Finding No. 16, it appears that the zoning category for the subject property was correctly identified in the Planning Department Report as "G" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) rather than the "GS-1" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) indicated in the above Finding. The error was due to the use of an incorrect version of the Zoning Map. The City's Zoning Map has since been corrected. (See attached) . The error, after reviewing the Examiner's Decision, does not appear to be substantive and therefore would not change the decision. • cc: Members of Council Planning Department City Clerk Attachment .1 .• • � , . sir• . .............,........ ., . ; z . . _._ _ -__ -. � r ... w ^ i / 1' •• . . R". g L_.. 1 t [ e •. • t �,t� n • r,�• ..•. 1O +r�s� s •. Jy Q rya s• • • . 14, •1,116 , 4 ,e' . : . ''41% a .! 14`...i• : I . : • • � i.., J•�. f-e ms,;++, •• •e�• / . 1 • SR-1 , cJ.: .ritai•• GS-i1• i i ' ' • : G70�• �' 4�+ = � �ty + T., al 1it'li -) .- ' • . a'r' 1 1 � , ,: ? - .. . . . ,ia -\ 1 . i -.. — — ` �^ , ": • S R -� .; • • iN •. E•Kt.a 1. t .j "o"t"'r _ . tI i ,.;3IPI • . rM I 1 -3 '0., - . i— • J * ) . .. ...-..)--, _.4- -L..._:,-. . , Bi—I ., , . • t -- .-— T.' 47'1- -in-- ..- -11---- '—' r----- I I II -4,7 I 1 i • �I ?f 4 ; i U r • ZONE USE MIN LOT ZONE USE MIN LOT SCALE 1"=800' R-1 Sing. Faro. Res. .7200 SR-2 Two Fem.: Res, 10000 SECTION i, SR-1 Sing. Fem. Res. 7500 R-3 Mulit-Fare• Res: 5000 '` • G . Sing. FaM. Res. 35000 R-4 Multi-Fam. Res. 5000 •, G-6000 Sing. Ferry. Res. . 6000 P-1 Public, Use . • G-7200 Sing. Fern. Res: 7200 B-1 Business PAGE- G-8400 Sing: Fam. Res. 8400 BP Business Parking , G-9600 Sing: F4m. Res. 9600 L=1 Light Industry GS-1 . Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 . H-1 . Heavy Industry - Sin . Faun. Res. • 40000 ' T Trailer. Park ' R-2 Two Fam, Res: 7200 A-P Manufacturing Park _ __ -. .... .4,-.•.•..w4 g'..diea r EMA-4ec.A.41.: '.. 15 ,fi.. K....A:A6,As 2 :*'.:0.11T .* *.it MAP..: *It:•Ilf'': 7• '^ 'fi Y lT •1t ! 7( 1 OF R4� THE CITY OF RENTON t$ 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o ° • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER `O• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O 4P 9.411F0 SEP�E�O November 28, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File Nos. R-434-79; First Church of the Nazarene SP-433-79 Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone request and the special permit request which requires Council approval, dated November 21, 1979. The appeal period for the application expires on December 5, 1979, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on December 6, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on December 10, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter`, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment • of R4,11/ THE CITY F RENTON CHARLES J. DELO RENT 4 © ' FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS Q co' MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 200 MILL AVE. S.IRENTON, WA. 98055 / 235-2642 09gT6-0 SEPT°°P CHIEF: DICK GEISSLER August 23, 1979 Pastor Lowel Welker First Church of the Nazarene 246 Wells Ave. No. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Pastor, Regarding our conversation on fire protection requirements on your new proposed church located on Union Ave. N.E. , just north of Honeydew Elementry School. A new water main and fire hydrant will be required. The fire hydrant shall be located approximately one half way of the building within fifty feet of exterior wall near entrance. A fire alarm system is required, I would recommend this system be connected to a central station. Changing your building plan so that building would be located closer to Union Ave. N.E . would make for easier access for emergency use as well as making better use of fire hydrants on Union Ave. N.E. . If I can be of further assistance, please call. Sincerely, Richard Geissler, Chief Renton Fire Department RG/cr , - JO 0 -First Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 August 23, 1979 • Office of Land Use Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Sir: On March 22, 1977, the First Church of the Nazarene in Renton, Washington, requested at a public hearing, a special permit for location of a church within a single family residence district. There was no opposition. On March 29, 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved the request. (The file number is SP-003-77) . Since that time we have revised our building to what we believe, will be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. We believe that by maintaining the 100 ft. setback from the north property line, and the 18 ft. setback from the south property line, as permitted under the special permit; moving the building forward to have a setback of approximately 150 ft. would be more eye appealing to the community. This would make our building have the same setback as the Honey Dew Elementary School which is next door to the south. Our reason for moving the building forward is not only for eye appeal from Union Avenue, but also for easier access for fire protection. We have counseled with Chief Geissler and are in full agreement with his desires. Correspondence is attached for you review. We believe that the above mentioned change is for the betterment of the community and the fire protection of the property. We believe that this change is within the scope of the original permit. Your concurrence will be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, we would appreciate the possibility of the existing RECEIVED cm OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AUG2 31979 AM PM 7a8I9i10e11.1211,21 3,4,516 : Ca r)5 garage, presently serving the existing parsonage, to remain. It was inadvertently ommitted on the first 'proposal by our designer. Sincerely, Lowell Welker, Pastor, President LW/ag • OF R411 � Gam. J 0 7. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION • 235-2631 0 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA. 98055 04)4i_ SE P IE CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR March II , 1976 Church of Nazarene Wells Ave. N. and N. 3rd St. Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Pastor Woods Subject: Sewer Service to new Church Site Gentlemen: This department has investigated the downstream sanitary sewers and determined there is sufficient capacity to handle the effluent from your proposed church. Upon annexation or proper application sanitary sewer service is available to the site. Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director RCH:pmp -..4.. ° 1 ja di , . •• ' 'C- • -.1s. `1j, ./ 4 TIli CITY OF RENTON 0 Air r' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o • °j CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR , /3 co• . . 44, May 21 , 1976 ,94TFD SE PI ,- King County Boundary Review Board King County Courthouse . Seattle, Washington 98104 REGARDING : Notice c.j , Intention . . • Woods A.nnexat.ion ' 6entlemn : As required by Chapter 3b . 93 el the Revised Code of Washington, a Notice 'of Intention is hereby given by the City of Renton to annex . by the petition method the territory generally referred to as the • "Woods Annexation. " This area lies contiguous to the eastern corporat ._ limits of. the City of Renton east of Union Avenue N.E . ( 132nd Avenue S .L . ) and west of 138th Avenue S .E . contiguous to the. Honeydew. Elementauy School . , The City of Renton herewi:th • transmits the following exhibits' to • • assist the Board in its consideration of the proposed annexation. It is understood that the board will. furnish copies of the Notice of Intention (attached) to the State Department. of Ecology, State Department of Social and Health Services and King County as required by state law. The items submitted are numbered in accord- ance with the listing below: * Exhibit 1 : A description of the proposed action with special attention given to Chapter 35A.14 . 120 through 35A . 14 . 150 of the Revised Code of Washington . * Exhiit 2 : A brie:' statement regarding the background and reasons for seeking the annexation with • supporting documentation. , * Exhibit 3 : A legal description of the boundaries of. the • proposed annexation . ** Exhibit 4 : A King County Assessor ' s map illustrating • Renton ' : corporate limits in that vicinity, the proposed annexation and the number of acres in the proposed annexation (not included in this report) . • ?u .1.. • King County Boundary Review Board May 21, 1976 Page Two * Exhibit 5 : Vicinity maps, showing the following special districts; water, sewer, and fire. * Exhibit 6 : A map illustrating the current municipal ' • boundaries with the proposed annexation. * Exhibit 7 : A review of factors as stated in RCW 36 .93 .170 as they relate to the proposed ' annexation. * Exhibit 8 : A review of the effect of the proposed annex- ation as related to the objectives set forth , by the Boundary Review Board in RCW 36 . 93 .180 . *** Exhibit 9 : The required $25 filing fee (RCW 36 .93 , as amended by Chapter 3 , Laws of 1969 , Extra- ordinary Session) , not included in this report. Notice process, and other communications regarding this proposed annexation should be directed to: C . J. Delaurenti , Mayor City of Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 and to the following additional persons, governmental units , and private service companies : Gordon Y. Ericksen Water District 90 Planning, Director City of Renton Fire District 25 Jim' s Disposal, Inc .. Pastor Al Woods 1201 Lind Avenue S.W. 246 Wells Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington 98055 • Should the board members desire additional information to assist in the review process, please contact the planning department. Sincerely, ' / ) C ./ . Delaurenti M yor * 23 copies ** 5 copies *** 1 copy Attachments • • • • ' • • • EXHIBIT 1 Description of Proposed Action The City of Renton proposes the annexation by the petition method of land area contiguous to the present incorporated limits of the city under those applicable provisions of Chapter 35A. 14 Revised Code of Washington (RCW) with specific reference to Chapter 35A. 14. 120 through 35A. 14 . 150 . The Notice of Intention is filed with the Boundary Review Board under the provisions of Chapter 35 . 93 . 090 RCW and Chapter 36 . 93 . 130 RCW and other specific sections relating to information to be considered by the Board . EXHIBIT 2 Background Information The Woods Annexation was initiated by Pastor Woods of the Nazarene Church to be able to construct a church . Even though there is a sanitary sewer line in front, of the church, property that the city would permit him to connect to , the church prefers to be in the city. The two other property owners want to be in the city in order to obtain basic utilities , especially sanitary sewers to be able to develop at urban densities . The percolation in this general area is very poor so sanitary sewers are necessary to develop . Without municipal utilities there is a question whether any further development would be allowed at anything approaching suburban densities . All of the property owners favored annexation and signed the annexation petition . The Letter of Intent was presented to the City Council on February 9 , 1976 (minutes attached ) and a meeting was established for February 23 , 1976 (minutes attached ) . At that public hearing the council voted to accept the Letter of Intent , established conditions and authorized the circulation of the annexation petition . The petition was circulated and pre- sented to the City Council on March 15 , 1976 (minutes attached ) at which a public hearing was established for April 12 , 1976 (minutes attached ) . At that public hearing the council accepted the annexation petition and authorized the Notice of Intention be prepared for the King County Boundary Review Board . (60 EXHIBIT 7 Review of Chapter 36 . 93 . 170 R . C .W . AREA , ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed Woods Annexation is about 15 . 3 acres in area . The King County Comprehensive Plan designates the area as single family residential and it is presently zoned S-R . The city ' s comprehensive plan designates the annexation as single family residential . Upon annexation the area will assume a "G " zone which is a large lot (35 ,000 square feet ) single family holding zone . Should a developer wish to develop more intensely than allowed in a "G" zone , he would have to apply for a rezone . For a rezone to be approved , it would have to , among other things , conform to the comprehensive plan . Any existing use that is not consistent with the Renton zoning ordinance would be given a non-conforming status and could remain until the use is abandoned , provided there is no health or safety hazard . LAND USE , POPULATION AND GROWTH POTENTIAL There are four single family dwelling units at the present time in the proposed annexation . This calculates to between 10 and 15 people in the annexation . Two units are in the western portion and the remaining two units are in the eastern portion . A church is proposed to be constructed in the western portion (about 6 . 4 acres ) of the annexation . Assuming that the eastern portion ( 8 . 9 acres ) is developed as a subdivision of 4 . 5 units per acre , there would be approximately 26 units constructed in addition to the two presently there for a total of 28 units . Assuming that there are 3 . 2 people per unit (this fugure has been found in annexations in this portion of the city) , the eventual population of the eastern portion would be 85 to 90 people . It is not known whether the two units in the western portion will be retained when the church is constructed . NATURAL FEATURES The annexation is relatively flat varying about 30 feet in elevation and slopes to the west toward the city being part of the Cedar River drainage basin . According to the 1973 "Soil Survey by the U . S . Soil Conservation Service , the area has Alderwood soil which has severe limitations for on-site sanitary sewer systems . BOUNDARIES The boundaries of the annexation consist of the city limits (Union Avenue N . E . which is a street) on the west ; property lines on the north ; 138th Avenue S . E . on the east ; and property lines and city limits on the south . It is anticipated that this is an interim annexation and the boundaries will change . In fact there has been an annexation initiated for the contiguous land to the south . PROXIMITY TO POPULATED AREAS The annexation is located contiguous to the City of Renton and is in a rapidly growing portion of King County . There are several subdivisions nearby ( Honeydew , President Park , Brentwood , etc . ) that have a density of four to five housing units per gross acre . The annexation is oriented socially and economically to the City of Renton . The city was certified by the state as having 27 , 334 people in 1975 . SP-003-77 Page Two Mr. Woods asked for clarification of Item P. 7 , of Exhibit #1 , which disallows the use of exterior loudspeakers , and asked if the restriction includes chimes, etc. Mr. Smith indicated that the item referred to loudspeakers only. Mr. Woods briefly reviewed the history of acquisition of the property , including a recent annexation, and indicated cooperation in fulfilling obligations imposed by the Planning Department in order to construct the facility. In regards to previous discussion about access to the undeveloped portion of the property, Mr. Woods reported that ingress and egress for the proposed facility would be onto Union Avenue N.E. with proposed access for future expansion to be negotiated with property owners to the back of the property. He indicated discussions had been held with said property owners in regard to future access. The Examiner asked if existing trees on the property would be retained, and Mr. Woods indicated that one tree would remain but the other would be removed because of the placement of the structure on the site. The Examiner asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Since there was none, the hearing on Item #SP-003-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10: 50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter , the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. The request is to allow the construction of a proposed church facility by special permit in a single family residential zone. The church and accompanying parking will consist of an area of approximately 24 , 000 gross square feet. 2 . The subject site is primarily undeveloped; however, there are two existing single family residential structures located on the property with various accessory structures . Honey Dew Elementary School and its accompanying playground is located directly to the south of the site. There are single family residences located to the north of the site, and Kiwanis Park is located directly west fronting Union Avenue N.E. 3. All existing utilities are available and are in close proximity. 4 . Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, R.C.W. 43. 21.c , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 5. The structure is compatible with required setbacks , lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-706. 3. IDLandscaping as is indicated on the submitted plan is in compliance with the code and seems to be sufficient to provide an adequate buffer at the perimeter of the property to minimize adverse impacts. 7 . In reviewing the landscape plan, the Planning Department has suggested several modifications regarding material types , sizes, and location. 8 . The property was advertised and was posted in three conspicuous places near the subject site. There is no apparent opposition to the proposed church. r March 29 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: First Church of FILE NO. SP-003-77 the Nazarene LOCATION: Just north of Honey Dew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. • • SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a special permit to al ow construction of a proposed church facilit in a single family residential zone. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval RECOMMENDATION: subject to conditio s. Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval subject to conditio s. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was eceived REPORT: by the Examiner on March 15, 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department r-port, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 22 , 1977 , at 10 :25 a.m. in the ouncil Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr. Alfred Woods, representing the applicant, had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record a- Exhibit #1 . Michael Smith, Planning Department , reviewed Exhibit #1 , and en ered the following, additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Site Plan Map. Exhibit #3 : Landscape Plan. Exhibit #4 : Elevation Plan. The Examiner inquired about access to the undeveloped portion o the property for future expansion. Mr. Smith reported that access ould be through the westerly portion of the site. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if he had additional comments or e hibits to enter. Mr. Smith reported receiving letters from various ci y departments: Fire Department, Engineering Division, and Utilitirs Division; and read the subject letters into the record. The Examiner asked Mr. Woods if he concurred in Exhibit #1 , and Mr. Woods indicated his concurrence. Responding was: Mr. Alfred Woods President, First Church of the Nazarene 246 North Wells Renton, WA 98055 • SP-003-77 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before April 5 , 1977 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. J- n • SP-003-77 Page Three 9. The church has gone through several planning revisions and modifications in order to comply with the latest amendment of the residential zone regarding the location and siting of churches. 10 . The plans have been reviewed by all the departments that are affected by the impact or construction of this facility. 11 . The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions , and departmental recommendations in this matter, and this report itself , being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated into this report by reference as set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS : 1 . The applicant indicated that he had reviewed the Planning Department staff report and has concurred with staff ' s recommendations. The Examiner has reviewed and concurs with the acceptance of the design and approves the location, and finds that the proposed use is in compliance with all provisions , regulations , and standards as set forth in Ordinance No. 3050 . 2 . After a thorough examination, it is the conclusion of the Hearing Examiner that the church and its incidental activities will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent or surrounding properties or the enjoyment thereof. 3 . The proposed facility has met the following requirements : a. Access b. Lot coverage c. Setbacks d. Landscaping e. Parking f . Views g. Surface drainage h. Provision for traffic flow and circulation i . Esthetic compatibility with surrounding area j . Submittal of a landscape plan 4 . After examining the application , the Fire Department has concluded that two additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed by the applicant . 5. The proposal meets the objectives of the Land Use Report , 1965 , Pages 17 and 18 , Objectives, as officially adopted by the City of Renton. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department recommendations , Items 1 through 8 , and the additional installation of two fire hydrants as specified by the City of Renton Fire Department . ORDERED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 . ames L. agstadt Land U Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Alfred Woods PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The site is generally level. 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture, berries , row crops, and for urban development . 3. Vegetation: The bulk of the subject site has been' cleared but mixed stands of deciduous and conifer trees line the perimeter. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the' subject site, (October 17, 1979) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is primarily undeveloped. However, one existing single family residence is lbcated on the property together with various accessory structures. . Honeydew Elementary School is located directly to ' the south of the subject site. There are existing single family residences located north of the site and west of the site across Union Avenue N.E. Kiwanis Park is located north and west of the subject site across Union Avenue N.E . Eo NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are primarily single family resi- dential with some mixed public/quasi-public uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer : A 12" water main and 15" storm sewer run north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site, while an 8" .sanitary sewer extends .east- west on N.E. 10th Street within 700 feet to the north of the property. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Ddpartment as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 107 and 108 operate along Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. -. 4. Schools: The Honeydew Elementary School is adjacent to the subject site on the south, while McKnight Middle School is approximately 14 miles to the northwest , . and Hazen High -School is within 3/4 of a mile to the north- east . 5. Recreation: The grounds of the Honeydew Elementary School and Kiwanis Park provide good opportunities for nearby recreation. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING 'CODE : 1. Section 4-729 , G, General Classification District 2 . Section 4-704, SR-1, Suburban Residence District 3. Section 4-706( 3) , Churches by Special Permit I - _ Ex;Z“ -i- D PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'II PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER II PUBLIC HEARING • NOVEMBER 13, 1979 APPLICANT: FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FILE NUMBERS : R-434-79 and SP-433-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The. applicant requests approval of a, rezone from G• to SR-1 and a special permit to allow expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: ' RENTON FIRST CHURCH 'OF ' THE' NAZARENE 2. Applicant : ' RENTON FIRST CHURCH 'OF ' THE NAZARENE 3. Location : Vicinity of 850 Union (Vicinity map attached) Avenue N.E, . just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal descrip- tion is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : ±6 . 5 acres. • 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N.E. 7. E::isting Zoning: "G" , General Classification District , minimum lot size 35,000 square feet . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: S-1, Residence Single Family, minimum lot . size 40,000 square feet; G, General Classifica- tion District , GS-1, General Classification District , mini- mum lot size 35,000 square feet . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential. 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date; notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on October 19 , 1979 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on October 18, 1979 . C. HIS,TORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 3058 dated August 24, 1976 , at which time the present zoning classi- fication was applied, On March 29 , 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site (reference file SP-003-V77) . A building permit was issued on November 5, 1979, for one phase of the church construction „ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. In March of 1977, the Renton First Church of the Nazarene obtained a special permit from the Hearing Examiner to construct a church on a site just north of the Honeydew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. The special permit allowed for a church of approximately 20 ,000 square feet set back approximately 300 feet from Union Avenue "".E. and 100 feet from the northern property line. The appli- cant has modified their plans by upgrading the quality of the exterior treatment of the building, moving the struc- ture forward approximately 150 feet and increasing the structure by 6 , 800 square feet to allow a full sized gymnasium. 2. In the original review in 1977, it appears that several points may have not been adequately addressed. First , a minimum of a 100 foot setback is required from any other developed lot which is zoned residential . The Honeydew Elementary School site to the south is zoned GS-1. The property was annexed in July of 1959 and given a GS-1 zoning classification , even though the school was pre-existing on the site. In 1965, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site into a Public/Quasi-Public Land Use Classification. The site was never rezoned to P-1 because there was never any reason to. The school was already existing. The G zone is still a residential zone. However, in this particular case, it is not developed with residences. Therefore, it is not seen as a requirement in the opinion of the Planning Department . Secondly, the Hearing Examiner in 1977 approved the build- ing location only 18 feet from the southern property line. Section 4-706( 3)( a)4. requires a 25-foot landscaping strip along all property lines. It would appear that this is a code requirement that the Hearing Examiner may not have had the authority to modify. However, a building permit has been issued on the site for the construction of a church as originally allowed, and it would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback. 3. The site plan complies with the other requirements as designated in Section 4-706( 3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern property line. It will have to be set back 25 feet instead of the 18 feet shown. This will reduce the parking by 4. However, the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces. The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans. Therefore, the parking required still remains the same , 90 parking spaces. 4. The church construction has been divided into three phases. Phase 1 is presently under construction. It is composed of the multi-purpose room/gymnasium. It complies totally with the special permit issued in 1977. Phases 2 and 3 include the sanctuary and the foyer. These are intended to be extended to the west of the original building site. The structure was moved to the west because the exterior treatment of the building was upgraded to cedar finish instead of metal and to allow better access for fire fighting. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965, Objectives, p .ges 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact on the property. However, subsequent devel- opment will remove the soils, disturbing the vegetation. increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise level in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, many of these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not applicable. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social : Development of the subject site as a church will provide increased opportunity for social interaction within the area congregation. 5. Traffic : Data on average daily trips (ADT' s) is not available for churches from the Traffic Engineering Divi- sion. Therefore, given an estimate of two trips/week/ parking space, a total of 180 trips/week would result (based on 90 required stalls) . It should be noted, how- ever, that these trips will all occur at the same time. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1972 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposals (see attached) . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 6 . City of Renton Police Department 7. City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1. The proposed rezone from G to SR-1 is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan , which desig- nates the site and surrounding area as single family resi- dential. 2. The subject site was annexed in 1976. Since that time, no area-wide or site rezoning requests have been considered on the site. 3. Items 1 and 2 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 of the Renton Municipal Code, thus substantiating the proposed rezone. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone from G to SR-1 based upon the compatibility of the proposed use with existing uses and the fact that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review, and being consistent with the Compre- hensive Plan land use element designation of single family residential . ..Pt',s ,-s.�,r_�.-....• ._ ..�.'.`' O_,. ..:�r._-...,.;,ro•.,._ .,� .,,..-...__,,a,:o� ,..,._,a .,,zr.-'r`�"x�7 ......r.\ • f'___-------- ••----,,>:1 . ' ''''" `G._.---.4 CI me l��'J L E6 ' •1:' k...„..7.,kgzA-Tji .-- , - _ -‘6.,,,,,,,, if.7'7 I __ 0 '' -' -I, gq T �. 1 ! . i' l",,,,.>cM7.1..-Z ---0044.1 ' •- -•.- t T .te^ s. ` -.se -l�Y 7 h i11 7 e--^" ' � _� U - r .v. - T• •� ' ' i F . }. ; .. , ,t:, , l� •+ � . i ra=---... r - - .: .'. _ \ • 14, • � 4 Cp' ')kl ' i '•'1 : ice',i • ' ' � ,, : "l -u - w,:- ` ? • .' w. V. ..- � tii'-e • ,. ti '!_..tpX,.41:. -_I }• •''y :D:•;i ',� ._ ;1'A-.'•„'-'1,.•'''.'-' ecTo.L� 4};t'".yi •'T.,L 'ii.n' ^' a{.�.�',®9 6 c_1 •' at il 7,.....1 aS„ ,, .. ; _ •r _,t•� •rl, 1 1YHT .. • , ! m ..., ®a v, 1 Ski ei_.r' .4-4z.ztttl -2A^ Gx4Cy za,0,,,,$,, -. N tt'J'•` T 4 __ va as ci �a _j°t�'_., 8•` ... . �.:7't9x, 1al e , ln:a�a��•: (]/eJjf'yv }� ,� E'er_. • _ �T._ i�,. '`, o ,�. bti^ t iii CP g2� :7 • • I,.__ . -.. .5 L'••' 1, ,_".,v. :�.....�..J°l. I • L ei ",i, 1 . ...�-�..�'t Fi`•.:.%^,r�'�.ga", ( ---;'''i'��; r- , �xr.•xmsa. ' 1, ','- y • 13:' ''7: • : ki �1'.• :11;:-.•;'-1,'--i•.(~`,`?•' `` "aid l 7 G9 wan P. • •} ° ' •♦ 8�� , ' f _ 3 - --- -i -.._._-.� __. - •----- - I T I '�_-- • t {{l,: 1oii Qf ta - M_ x. �_ " 6P Ci2 r a s ,. r I R...1 ..t,.: .,:) ...,..,;:„..„I • ~ ; —_:11 '- '` _.1._L".f__t_ d jt: x-._ r, t � ' Q..o�.,. g � �• . "`d! r�Juv,,l+�?i:e.` >.r,,E 7 rN , , ; • � :: • . r fi: { I•FIl j " I L — '1T,w .cw. .., •Q gP, a ,�r•m.y { "' rss_ a, .;.,_ 4, . {° � ,\l' t' t .1_ � a µ ft�Ik� 14 '., ,es o';t„It_ ieI . . i---- I • l_, qR-1 E I xessiomutassmosamiormasssearalmasc Rp m t i w - - 4 r---j` �!�1 T - I z' I . I I ti. 9----{{ • ccM za ? �7 L_° �, [ Uill I o - E .,�tarx:nv.'e®es�. ss,aw z ,,, f_ .7 Y i,•,,. >n _ . .„m - -- -_.�mmx -�•'.� va,.>m't! ,; »' ,a 1 _..;.s..:N ::a-�..ac _ - ..a..- -- :..t i REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT: ' FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE' i t I r • I `-.v. . 7-7^1-.7,C'.aS"..-•-• ,-...'Y.,...._,.Z<CTGa= ......_�.,3 .^-:-^..'S'397C .Tw.^a.. .. .z.L•@TSS.L^w"_^..."-^..Cr..= "RGK'T ^_. _ _'. ..-r.”,-.m�•T•:3PC:s1C".-,._.cu..-.i.:..w.ss_.... . a•V^^•^^'r.2..' I APPLICANT FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE TOTAL AREA ±6. 5 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Union Avenue N.E, • EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District EXISTING USE One single family residence/undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Expansion of a church and associated educational , facilities. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential i COMMENTS • m^.",,,,%"°_.'==. ._ ,31/T,=...,+....._.=',(zR^+ :.tc-.L¢•.7.=,,,.,oa^--^-- .•...^..r:.v.x'terra•-`,-.0,-•'••-c-......_s..,,,tc^,,-..r 1 II PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER ;13, 1979 PAGE FIVE 5. A revised landscape 'plan has not been submitted. Howe er, care should be taken to insure that proper screening i. . 'required to reduce the visual impact . The church has been set back the same distance from Union Avenue N.E. Has the Honeydew Elementary School to be compatible wit rthe school instead of dominating that side of the stre-to 6. ' , Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees eist on the site from the house eastward to the property li e. Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan. 7.1'; A screen fence was suggested as a possible addition along the northerly landscape strip; however, propery landsc-p- � ing will be more effective than a fence. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested special permit , file number SP-433-79, subject to the following conditions : 1. Revision of the landscaping strip on the southern boundary of the rear parking to a width of 25 feet. 2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landsc-pe • plans including the revisions noted in "L" and the retention of existing trees wherever possible. Removal of trees shall be subject to prior approval of the Renton Planning Department in accordance with det- fled landscape plans. 3. Final Planning Department approval of screening metho•s along the north and south property lines. 4o Posting of a bond or other approved means of insuring proper landscaping installation and maintenance as pe ordinance requirements. 5: Parking lot lighting shall be of low height and inten-ity to reduce glare and light intrusion to adjacent singl: family residence. 6. Exterior loud speakers shall be permitted. 7. The portion of the site not developed at this time shell be retained in its natural state, and any future plan- for this area shall be approved by the Examiner. The purpose of these requirements is to reduce the impact of the 'fproposed development in the adjacent single family residences and retain the general character of the area. ) , • • , , LL !Cgh -d.S •weeirsiy 7 ye! to ti-7-11-1R2 19-si =I V-15c..10Vrac 1007 a I gi.17,5 es ; a ' 11 : 0 , . ) - --; -, - -- cir. (IA t Ej i ! i....1.. • 0'4 . , • , ,,. . 0 az 1: 0 I ' .. OP \ 4 5311A69 i d.;) ezzz,.=, c.--73L• c E , GD EmEn ea expzo eD Cf," 0 4....,.....4 C3 C...,..zCo C3 CMCZED 0 Cu...,- CD eT77",Cs ar=ED 0 CEED 0 1-11, 4 0 WO OM bx,ork,g,,~autowtiox. ,;• 5:,jeCifi1 A.LIV • • . ' , i . 0 • 19 ,I) kagevaugilp ! 1 ADM As • g sl . ,D5... , -- - - - , - . 1 .. „ AS •01.72g *.', , ' """--.7--1 "7"....."....--.."-"''''""'" t,o, . . . : .(: :.:..... .,:........:, :, . , ...•,•, •. . • .., . 77.777:::,..K.... ,.,.,,;„,..7:77.77,-.7,:.......:.......'.:.:::::::.,?..':....:..,::,.:.:.:(.:....;..,:.:i,..;-::.i:.-:-::-.....,.....:.-7.7.77.::::.:.!:,.:.:::-.;:;.,:.::. .. - ; E,-,, 1.,.•• .. ... -•.: ...:......:,..;:.,":,-:.,;,J.,...:i..i...,, :,.......:::..:-... ,--:•.:.•-,,,-.,-,..-.,040,1,7,-10,n34-,t.‘:::!i::.::..:::::i. :......;,:-5i,i,:, . -iHi::::0.:- 0 ';'..q ?.. :: ,..,,S„.:.,.„., .„,...,.,,,-„,,:gi:W•::! • , ,.• - !••-..):..:,.•... ..:...:::....,..!. ..-. ...::.•-:• . , J .•--. . .:. ,..p,,,,..:....:;...41!..:.:. J,... ..- .,: :-.-:....' ez. , , - • ...• • .. ...::.:.•.... • ••:::,.,:-.,m):'-m.,roi.•6"ag,t440........ „. ,:.....--.:..,i- ...:-- .2 s4:11-ks.::: .••••• it:01)ra:'''''':7 2 .'.,•....1':i•.•' i .,..,..,i,•,.,....:::„.:.:... •:.: .::,:.:::.:::*i:....i::.:: • i .,. Aroad.tee404w,...rsa '• 13 . PO i ' . , . , .. ::,. •.: '.' :•,.:. •• ... ; ., ,.::'. •:'i......•'.-•:'....':':'t':.. .'•::.**. -,..:-•,:',.:'..",:':'":..:::•::'....:''::. ..•!:':V 1C1':' :'.".::.'.:::''::-:'. .:i.:'.:.•,.::...•.;:'.'•:•.::'::.:•.' ..., '. •...'....::i.':•.':.:::I....' . 4;' ' '<:,14 ::.;4:4:;.,'...:' ' :,tif,:P 7 6 a.0:.''''S:: :..:*:::.••:1.:.:'.:i':.:.;•.• 8 , , . . • . - .. .... „ •-..:.: •-• mti,,..e44.6 •44,5'..".•-•Li ••••::•14•-',....:•:•••••:-..!::':'•... ' `"'l ' ... '', Gazzo C'("7" C'll*C2= G." C=Z2 M C=3 CD GM2:,0=2;),L' al=CD CEM.M CD , Cp C=20 zr, a-m6 6 iii,...t..w tizi/ 86 °OLT:z i ).1 wil 1,...1-1") , 0 1 'ees 0 . ; . .,11. 1 , . ! • Ei.rs;e gni.ic.3 .0 • A•e0 eg ( .A.5. . , as 65 '4'1 'IS -7 • I lic l 0 • vaqII oir L.L. E • ..M5 C3 6,7,;•.. CD f=ii3 cm a. c) , Gn sz.-m7D CZ) CLI:C>cD r7r,'D ICS3 # a- • ' 0 0 00 ,,Ts - 9 0 - . 0 ao Cr' ...=.0211•Fir.I. 611643 .61,11:.}.6[C•9112 7E11 CD • ............._ r u ,....L.,........ axaostomax 7...mai W" 0 9i4, E•:3 ; 1_, ,• 6 li] o „ _ . _ • l'—'0A-lo,_ ...._..........._ =,-/--S- 0.-1-0 i -g Af . E ...,c.,D et-• op c.r.•,=,cr, • - c::. CATI...7.2.,271.71-.. .:3 I , ori 13_ 0 Pa 0 a ,C 1 ; E:::i ' Li 0 'k-i',1 1 0 0 0. 0 ..0 , i, ' ..:11)• '---- g ,. , , ,. , ,,......_ "0:46'iii,.•.'!''''',5,, .... C'''....u... r•-,,, It)? I ' —,-;,, 1 .r o • I • I I tl ri h' I I �'Hfr Z ---• I-1 A S E 3II • �, . • • • uNa[R corosrRuc7 v J • • • • • t ^- e"vwe. _ r• - — I: •� •..i 1. _ 4 ' S4 cl ,kra,rel 05 ci-ii%a OO 77 b 77 M? 0 BY 3: U'U l- 1 i UN' <! 7 v t% a 'REVIEWING, DEPARTMENT? VISION : -_C_/t /" /� e-_ A-'(;//e/L=l= �'//l' Approved ' _____Approved with conditions Not Approved ., _----,. ) (pi , . , . i ..,._. „_,.____ , , ,, ,. , / s __ , .,, ,, . ,__„:„. _____, . , _.,,.:. ,..,, , . ,_ ,,, ,/ 7-y Signature of Director or Authorized Represe tative Date _._n r U T C Id T U 1:. .n P n n R_TsiEPi T.LO IN I 5.10_N: __._ :.__.__._ _� R aidecreat EVIEWING ,DEPART.MENT;DIVISION: Parks Rion - -Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved • • REVIEWING • DEPARTMENT,/DIVISION . _u_ _ 1�01f`C..--e- - - __-_----_. Approved __Approved with conditions _.—__Not Approved (,)0 „,,,<, 74 • Si inatur.e at Uiirector or Authorized—Representative Da- e REVIEWING D E P A R T M E N T/D I VI S ION : —_---._---__ _--_--_— — _____ — —Approved _ Approved '.•with conditions --_Not Approved • 1 gnature or Di r, c:For oi- A-u t 1ior 'i zed 12clire e siit a it ve ------- - • Date 'tent on Planning Departmen - I' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p l i cat ion : y 31 '_ m- a � Location :_Ike] ° P- j ' c & � 3Q.� Applicant : �p:�i`� TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DAV[-F:_A5 ? _', . g Police Department ' MEETING /0/6-71`,77 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering p"Duilding Division --___ Utilities Engineering Fire Department Of'li N S OR S iGGEST ONS . R -GAR )I IG, THIS S A.�'�P ,I CAT ION S[IOUJrD �[i P N WRI I�^dG (1L 1 HE /\['�'L1 APPLICATION ��f=1� �:1'I CO `r _ �I DION iVO�.IZ�.f�t:[.. (ARC) I G9 � jE HELD ON _ '-- _ AT 9 :00 AreCONFERENCE IN I IIL TIl i [�I) FLOOR (,�)hi E..f�Cf�CE RO�r i F YOUR DEPARTMENI�)I VI S I ON REPRESENTATIVE = ABLE TO ATT ,N THE ARC, PL ASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TOI THE IJVLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : UG PM ON /Pp 7� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONOT____l,L Q /Approved Approved with conditions • Not Approved -22 Signature of Director c?r /luthot•ized Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION._ _- Approved X Appr oved with conditions Not Approve • • • • S i mature r of -Director or Authnr'i zed I pr•e nt:ati Cate RE_ VIEW DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approv �d with conC, i t i ons __Not_Plot Approved • PROPOSED/FINAL .CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCI_L _ ON-SIGNIFICANCE R-434-79 Application No . SP-435-79 [ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No.. ECF-514-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone of 6. 5 acres from "G" to "SR-1" and expansion of church facilities by 6 , 800 square feet. Proponent FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Location of Proposal 850 Union Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have ED not have., ,a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was mace after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and Policies. , 2, Meets all mitigating measures of Zoning Ordinance.' lit) Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the led agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (propo's.ed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • • Responsible Offi ial David R. Clemens Title Ser r Planne � /7 • Date November 1979 Signature //g / �✓ • City of Renton Planning ' Department 5-76 • . I _ • • • , • . • • • • RENT . • e23 It. 7-1 z A .11_, NT E ..„.._,,, cHlf _kCili ,..01- the _.......______ ••••••_ . __•___ •••‘....,,, .....„-- , •. . , - .....-,,,..,,,N„.,,,,•• , ....„....„\......,— ----- ----.....:-.•.--a...:•,,,„gt , ---,-„,,....„._,..,„7„-,..,, _ ,,,,,,gvz,,,,,,,•,„,,,,-,tiem-lo,,„,p,•,,,•,„,.„,,-?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..•„,„„,,,,,„.„.,„.„..„ ,,,,,,,,,..„...•,,,...„,„,,,...,.,. ......____ •--. 7 ....,,,,-„,„-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,-::7,-„,„„4.,-„, , --;•,. ,-,--- .• i , , -,,,,,,,,, .,-0-47,,,,,,,,,,,04,,,,,•:,,,,,,,m,,,,E:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I,,,_., f•,,,,k,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ ... ,. _ .._--- ,-- ,„,,, „,..,„,,,,„.„, ,, *1'AVigt..4 0)0' ;•'..1"'''''4'. Wcir• ..4,,,k,i.I , L vs..., . •*1,?..1?'- 44 Iti, ,-,-- ,,...... , '1,,g ' „:1 lo•he , f .0.l'41b !‘,--- Atilta-. = .-• " vX:=4• 1?-,4- . Phi ef " . -c. —... .t.. ;6%4,•.14,, , . Lp 1*s‘1.V.•H.NtZ-?:'t.,-14-:,,,,,7,I',"4••-.-T..4 r-4-'-'1''.,'•4'''' f ' ; ,,,..... „..., : ntIls I.ietkt obo.gi4t mIi.t;o ivtl,...a....s z .,.._,.._.. ..- l'-`'.-;.A..%—',,,'i4,,:c..3.,,S.,,%=.',:.,,,,,,,,'''4,,A,„"4-54»:',t.ik'',„,,.,„'.74e, ,', "..-,..'riaTil. '414„11,L11.7,,e:-',,_.*$.4,^,' ati,,Z.',,,.116=.:-'''.0 r'.1.,46.,,„,,T,,,,,',,of.ri-AitA v.; ''-^„.,.v...,'•=,*' ‘`,,,,g,"-..• - . '''''4 1..... ..° tt.tt,iir,,,,, 31-5,,:.M.Ak25,4144.3.014WIV:, ,. •C'N,..1":444,,:""'1,14" -..,,- :-.=-4..,-, 1, *fp, §fy.14 •,, ,.., -,===,,,,,,i,...-,-,.. 7,7-1-:-4,•.. ,,,.04.,_-,„,,:f„.. -- , . e t_,,, ‘4.4C4.7.1,4a-1,-,- "s7Ar,--,-i-,-.44z,tP,•-•=q`irgi•&1,!, 2-tW'Ailn:Nr=^X•'41:&,, 4 -0,t„.1 •,Iil ,k. , •"`-) ,,;.• .,,-;.c. mr..- z....,:- -4 ,-.:4 ,, .,,,,,14.„ ,4,44. '7-...:.,..; - - ,,Mt-t :. ,fr, --- , li g, :;:e4„,,,,-.771----._-_-:-..-,.... .,- .04.4.4 .. '0,-%.4.., ' - c4i-"*A77-R: < . 4•••"' *- • vii,,li, ,•14r,,eAN.,..t.1 "..•-`14.i. ':.iit,,, 1 '•:',$Z. -4,-c-',4=4 ••,-f„..2%•.° -:-•*•-ts „ • 11...„•Tv• atr, ,9,,t,,e1_,I. : ,„zir- ,,-. - ,,--._ !,,,.. _T, r v, '''C' , . ei:::.4 ,.;.!..7_,:e‘,r4,r,,..4' ,:;:,:::.;.,11.,., -------,74.64,1141 L1:24',...7a,..............,..sta-- .._....,.„..:,..r. ----- --- - --- . --,-,,,r... .I.'.;a.*Ng' ily,k'•'''' ''.'9:'' tilL.‘'!'"•31-;t„14,k,1....11,1i.r........i. .........&.;a477.,I '''s ia- :- ,. ,x,I„1-7,...:•Z.,,,t.4..-.'W,t;t:e 4M-,.,4 -1.ki.,,.. , .,, ,„., ... ''''''-' --'---'s l' '4,.1.' r -- -„•,N HT.-•,,•p v•-4'-A eg 1 q717irrif it,,174314 _,5 _,•''":. ". "- ••••:'"--.,-.;, ......,...i.---' '-,...z,".''' il • , 0 9.3W4"''.-4'N'^4.'"'4''41'NT54,k.A1M16'32''' .," 1-'::14.5'. ...":7"-- 1"'"1-'"" ' '....vv e'......". ' r, Cr 1-:/:-/Ii, • -, --;,kez..?..t.,L,I.,...ibp.4 v,,,,yi,,iKP,:g:.,•;-r-,-,:kmi„-.-r..-le,as,-,;w-.t:,.i,,r..._,-< jizez .-.::-.4 .7-c-z, .---,,,---t--- --- - , ' :- ••••,-. ..'1'. -'-'1.04,,sP-:.''' 44-9..1.6:: 11 SAr.4.f.'1.7 ::."="-16.-,..-,Sv-k fti,,,.__ '.1',--4..... ..o..Lim,-.;-,,,,..;....„... ------_--2,L4'-e''"' =!. , ..., -..:7 -:,1`, ' 1 . -- ;:,.p,,,.. - i'•-,'"i,„- 4.,. :•----'si.',-...4. ,-ttipt..-,--4-Pmt-af.,P•h•g.--- -..Z...'.--s,;;;... ..,........___ i/cit'`‘'''..s fiLertrin - ",_-••••-:. N•••.' " •:,'.;. •:.11.);0• ., ' -,...,.7, •••"-t-,••••• •:•-•-"‘"1.` p...rt.....p..•-.....„. ...94,1 I (I( •. .... ' ..:2••••!,z5.7.....,,,A.V.4,4t,- ..„....t. +." , .k,,. ...-..._ _ NOV 1 ID711 1 --- ---..., .."'rk-Z1,41.-,;,--. _-_.----• .1---,---zge-, ..., ;.i- --:•_-"--.„e..- , --= ...,, ------- . ,-"S' • ,'_-_--... ,_ , ---_ --'--------- -- ----, ,-:•-• `- ._ ..___. Ali , Z.A NON I& A SSOCI T \-- u . •?'"'G Dr:Pc c...•' _,. .,, udding designers Tl n '' i l ( • l , ' • ) .,r,Z1F-rrs.-4tifttaf-e17.--i,ril-g1.1,i§V.45a.:4.P;ili.1!4•4-9,-fkl-11,.4,..10"...'1:tr,•c.t.;,4•;•!Iii-V,f-*iW.7.:ITA`7',..:01;;Ilit,•7•41i6.--ii-flE9t.Vit:;Ii*.f.a•VreCilVistarLi-J'. . VS.,,,V,•.„iti,...Ariu,41..a0.4q,',,ii.4.Fre .,..:',..o,z,f02,11-filVf''-,-,-'..4'. .t",.', 1-4 -',.-',4..,..,-.,,..--4•••'.. ..0::',t-x.,.:,.'qiii•2•1,41;5i.okii0-i.p.•*-44t4ily.f.i;cirm•- . • . '''''''';'"A'''''''';''''1'.41.•."4::"Aiq'ri,•'•;:,•:t•Attquii.t.4-2AAA-.4.".iti,P;,.1'''t."!Ai•‘4:A.,44:4:AA:A,Y-,4:A..,:A.,,,A...,,.....•;' .. ,, -,_ -..---,,.,:,:.,,..:3,1-,....,.,,,, ,i,.;,1,x.;,-tr.:°.4•Alz;02.fft,,,t,,,,;;,-:pgty.:Ote,:'•A . -gi.•,„z4.::•;•ki.t...•,.."--„•:;;`!,;.\A-,,,-,;-.1.-,i,lr-..-',4g;f-‘1.::.,' ' f,,'•..,,:i' "••V.,••':?v•,... • .'••.' .•••'1,,.''.f.';''..",R!'•.''ig.....-Vt'34'..r•Ir'.'1-t•,••.,,..!tZ14',..ti,..' „":.,,,,,,;:,,,...0.,.:,,<..,1,'M.,t14.,...,:",...:11:'Z;,-:.iiNi:',1 ,..:". .::."-":.,'t ‘,•,..„,',' . .41,L-''''''''''''''i'4.4--g''''-4..‘ ....4.' ''4.k,g • ....:,4-t-.--r.,;!-1.,r. ,f--0-- - .-...1.,-„,.-•• •q..,.,--;.......ii,..,-,. •:nt- :,-L34..,..4-.7..-:•;,51:,').:..--4-,_4.,E."._.....:......f,,,,,.-.. .4 . ,-,,,it;..-.:.;,,,..0,7;,.•:. • ..,-. .... ..i.- _5.........--, . - . ff:•,-..-J-26.1 cwatizz...,„:-;,L- '''''—--------''''''-* - •i ,, 41 1 ..,."4,'; . 4 :.-77.--7:1-7-:= '..-,--x—..1-ZS __'eStlea'.e,..:ZZV___%:.--Vg /-7= Vilf,.,f`X _-- -- ,,,,,,c,...7cw Arn u u. 1 11,2 ';'',.• . --AractN2rErc_--- im.r.xtgaoE:4v-ra illOtiiii I. li ; I! Joy..flonsnpxo potalerep . _ . • . • . . . . .. • 'all . I • 'A 1 • ; i , ; A • '''f'4'S --i-— • I q],I ii eh . kF' 1 ' • 11,-7 1 4 ! 1 11 1 11 ICC: 1'11 1 . •• • ii,4 ,1, .... •. . -,, 1 10, 101 - ' i---' '' '•'•MM 1 ?.1 it II I 1. • • ' I," g , ill, 1 •. i i till l• ,I1'1 .,:' !I • 1 .1[ 1 ' • ' 1 ''' . • 4 • „ ' •• i„ :-. i i. , ,-, 1, I r • ' 1\ . r . - .. tr''. 1;,..1 ! •• ',...'1" 1 ;I . • • . ..4. '!I • 1 L 1 : ‘ / ' Airi' ;, : • i..4 •:1_,- 1;.' 1 \ ; • , 1 ( Ai 4" ••, II•,• - ;1 i sii , kz • t. -• IV .I i 0 :.m. • ••. 1 ii 1..„,, ,,. 1 • A 1;;1 1 1 ' ', Al;1'1• i I " 1 \I t 1''1 c • , i k4 ,• i _ .. 4 '11i 1, 1 , d„,,, "i,i , . ;11.1.i,i ,011 .. , 1 1 I 4111 1' i 1 I ill 111'11 i ; 1 r-4. 'c • • ' I' •1., I\ i lI111 1 0 ', 1'.. • 11‘ t i I 1,•. , , 11,4 P ,, ,•,, .. „ ; • , ; I. , . • ..! ...i. , iii „, ,. . , i...„:•••0!' •-,,, •-u.:- ....in.;r: • • • 4:;;Y.A47,i , .% 'III • ' • f k;.‹..-,Ff ••-' 01, ,-....,,„ .'14•1•:',.i.. •:!•";1!•,•, • *: i '3,, : $ ''''••••/ qi"..,31.', .. . --. ,, , . - \ • I I, • I, ' ,,,,,,,,:n,A;.....- '•1 • ",'1501,:$?:.,:- C . zioraytai: i;• ‘; • . 4• . . t l' . , . . . ., *I ' ,.-------•-, • //• , • , 7.r•-) •'-• '. ;I-- 2.. .r--'' .? %, " • . • _' . . I _ • _ . .. ___. , , / ; . . ', .. 4 . . a 1 . . . . . •! ';:::!..,:.,,..,','%...L.,..!1 , V . .. .. `H .:� RENTON T- rf ', t$_E,t= 9 r:ir .i CHURCH OP THE NAZARENE 850 UNION AVENUE NORTH EAST RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE; 271-3206 Pors#on: Minioteit o f M 8 V: LOWELL V. WELKER WILLIAM K. HARMANING Phone: 772-2815 Phone: 226-4083 November 30, 1979 .5 4 J b 70� G �® co City Council N �0��(0 -- City of Renton �y, oft FNCA c 200 Mill Avenue South ��, ON�r is of - �`.8 Renton, WA 98055 4)�e�'�?QZ�`'��� NOTICE OF APPEAL Dear Sirs: This letter is to officially appeal the decision of Mr. Fred 3. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner, according to Title IV, Section 30-6. • It is specifically in regards to his findings and conclusions of a Special Permit, File Number. SP-433-79 dated November 21, 1979, I propose to point out several errors that he made, both in his findings and his conclusion. I would then like to present to you why I feel that his decision should be overturned and the Special Permit issued. On pages 3 through 5 of the Report and Recommendation to the Renton City Council we find his Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations: FINDINGS: 1-7. I am in complete agreement with his findings. 8. In paragraph 1, I am in agreement; however paragraph 2 is in error. I would like to present as exhibit "A", a letter from Mr. James L. Magstadt, Hearing Examiner, to Mr. Alfred Woods, then Pastor and President of the First Church of the Nazarene, dated April 13, 1977. Dear Mr. Woods: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of March 29, 1977, r // 2 has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, James L. Magstadt Hearing Examiner Mr. Magstadt stated that action regarding our special permit was "Considered final", and was "being submitted to the City Clerk". . ."for permanent filing". The hearing examiner may have made an error in processing. The church was not, nor is not3responsible that possible error. Mr. Kaufman further states that the setbacks and landscaping required by Section 4-706 (3) (a) 3 and 4 were not complied with. This, too, is an error. I would like to submit as Exhibit "B", the report of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 29, 1977. On page three of that report, under CONCLUSION: Number 3 states: The proposed facility has met the fdllowing requirements: a. Access b. Lot Coverage c. Setbacks d. Landscaping e. Parking f. Views g. Surface drainage h. Provision for traffic flow and circulation i. Esthetic compatibility, with surrounding area j. Submittal of a landscape plan. FINDINGS: 9. In this finding the Hearing Examiner made an error. He states that, "the remainder of the parcel 'would' eventually be developed with single family residences." The word "might", or "could" should have' been used since there are no intentions of development, of the easterly portion, at this time. There has been some talk about a ball field as a possibility. 10. In this finding the Hearing Examiner states that, "the existing residence is 'proposed' to be used by the church as a parsonage". In fact, since we 3 purchased the property, this house has been used for nothing else. Presently the minister of Music and Youth, at the Renton First Church of the Nazarene, a full time, paid assistant, and his family live there. The only other possible usage of this house as a residence, would be for a custodian. 11 - 14. I am in agreement with the Hearing Examiner's findings. However, the property across Union Ave. N.E. to the west is not developed residential, but in fact, it is a Public Park, namely Kiwanis Park. 15. The building is to be setback 18 feet which was determined to provide adequate screening and landscaping next to a public school in 1977. 16. The property was zoned "G" not "GS-1" as the Hearing Examiner has stated, as a result of the annexation in 1976. I would like to submit as Exhibit "C" a letter from Mayor C. J. Delarenti, to the King County Boundary Review Board, dated May 21, 1976. On page 4, Exhibit 7. Review of Chapter 36.93.170 R.C.W. AREA, ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN it states in the second paragraph: Upon annexation the area will assume a "G" zone which is a large lot (35,000 square feet) single family holding zone. On pages 4 and 5 of the Report and Recommendation to the City Council, under CONCLUSIONS: the Hearing Examiner deals with the Special Permit. 6. The Hearing Examiner is in error when he states that "the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed church complies with the various landscaped, setback and parking requirements. I would like to submit as Exhibit "D", the. Planning Department's Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, dated November 13, 1979. It is the annalysis of Planning Department that we do comply. As to the parking requirements; on page 4 (L.) 3, the last half of the paragraph states: "the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces. The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans. Therefore, the parking required still remains the same, 90 parking spaces." !r/// 4 As to setbacks and landscaping the same paragraph states "The site plan complies with the other requirements as designated in Section 4-706 (3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern line." It is our contention that the property to the south, the Honey Dew Elementary School, is not zoned properly and is not an established single family residential area that needs to be protected from the location of a church. The school is setback approximately 75 feet1thus providing more than adequate separation. The Hearing Examiner is in error when he applies the 100 foot setback require- ment from the Honey Dew Elementary School. The comprehensive plan,the school site as public/quasi-public. This point of view is supported by the Planning Departments Analysis Point L (2). On page 4 (L) 2 the last sentence reads, ". . .it would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback." 7. I•am in agreement with the Hearing Examiner on this conclusion; however, the previous Hearing Examiner stated in Exhibit "B" page three, item 9: "The church has gone through several planning revisions and modifications in order to comply with the latest amendment of the residential zone regarding the location and siting of churches, item 10: The plans have been reviewed by all departments that are affected by the impact or construction of this facility." On that same page (3) under Conclusions: 3, the proposed facility has met the following requirements: a. Access b. Lot Coverage c. Setbacks d. Landscaping e. Parking f. Views g. Surface drainage h. Provision for traffic flow and circulation i. Esthetic compatibility with surrounding area j. Submittal of a landscape plan. 8. Please note the response to item 7, since this conclusion is repetitive. 9. The Hearing Examiner is in error on this conclusion. Since there is no plan for development of the eastern (internal) portion of the site and I/ • 5 since the Planning Department in their report, Exhibit "D", page 5 (1.) 6 which states: "Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees exist on the property line. Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan." This conclusion is irrelevant to the Special Permit. 10. The Hearing Examiner is in error when he states that the property is "too narrow to support the construction of the proposed church." As shown in other parts of this appeal, the previous Hearing Examiner ruled that the property was not too narrow. In Exhibit "C", the letter from Mayor C. J. Delarenti, to the King County Boundary Review Board, dated May 21, 1976, on page 3, Exhibit 2, Background Information states: "The Woods Annexation was initiated by Pastor Woods of the Nazarene Church to be able to construct a church." Obviously, prior to annexation into the city, the city was aware of our intention. I can further document City Council minutes and corre- spondence between the city and the King County Council if necessary, but why belabor the point. 11. The Hearing Examiner is still in error on this item, please patiently note the facts that I have previously given to you on this repetitive item. 12. The Hearing Examiner is in error here as well, because I have shown that he is in error not once, but on several items. Therefore, I appeal his decision that the Special Permit should be denied. WHY I BELIEVE THAT THE SPECIAL PERMIT SHOULD BE ISSUED In August of 1942, the Church of the Nazarene came to the City of Renton. As the congregation grew the church built at 246 Wells Ave. North. Through the years the congregation continued to grow until it had outgrown its facilities which covered more than 80% of its land. No adjacent property has been available to us, nor is it now. Since we are on the corner of two one-way streets, 3rd North and Wells Ave. North, coupled with the fact that we have no off street parking, both internal growth, 6 as well as service to our community became restricted. We need to relocate. When the property immediatly north of the Honey Dew Elementary School became available the church purchased it. Shortly thereafter we applied for annexation to the City of Renton for the express purpose of building a church building, Under Ordinance 3058, passed August 23, 1976, Published August 27, 1976 and became effective 5 days later on September 1, 1976 the property at 850-856 Union Ave. N.E. became a part of the City of Renton. Some 6 months prior to annexation in a letter dated March 11, 1976, Exhibit "E", Mr. Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. wrote the Church of the Nazarene• regarding "Sewer Service to the New Church Site." The church sought out a designer who designed a "steel building". It was 100 feet wide, 192 feet deep, and 22 feet high with a flat roof. Apparently, because they had chosen a rectangular steel building, which would have definite esthetic limitations, they requested a 300 foot set back from Union Ave. N.E. Had the church applied for a 150 foot setback, approximently even with the Honey Dew School, we would not be writing this appeal. On March 29, 1977 the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site (reference file SP-003-77) . There was NO opposition from the community or anyone else. After 2 years of design work, the church board, of the Renton First Church of the Nazarene, was not satisfied with the structure that we had taken the Special Permit out to build. We became aware of factors that relate to steel structures that we did not have before. We went and looked at a church building in Lynnwood, Washington, that is in fact, a Steel Building. Our conclusion was that the community would not be satisfied with this kind of structure. It looked like a warehouse or a heavy equipment garage, not a house of worship. We further discovered that we could build a beautiful house o•f worship, out of conventional materials, that would be a tribute to our community, that we are trying to minister to; a tribute to God Almighty, and one 7 that we would be pleased to say "that's where I worship", for about the same amount of money. We completely redesigned the appearance of the building to one that we believe, will enhance the neighborhood. We showed the drawings to some of our neighbors, who were more than pleased. On August 23, 1979, I wrote to the Office of Land Use Hearing Examiner, Exhibits "F" & "G", to see if simply moving the building forward on the property; to have instead of a 300 foot setback from Union Ave. N.E. , a 150 foot setback (the requirement from Union Ave. N.E. is not more than 25 feet. ) ; would violate the intent of the first Special Permit. He never wrote me back, nor called me on the telephone. He verbalized to the Planning Department of the City of Renton, that since we were in a "G" zone we would NOT qualify for a Special Permit in a residentual zone as the code states. Upon this advise,we applied for a Rezone from "G" to "SR-1" and applied for a new Special Permit, only to have the rezone granted and the Special Permit denied. Again there was NO opposition to either the rezone or the Special Permit. We have chosen to build our building in three phases. Phase One which consists of an administrative wing, a large fireplace room, a multi-purpose activity center which includes a full size gymnasium, a kitchen, showers and lockerrooms, electrical and mechanical rooms,4restrooms including providing for the handicapped. On November 5, 1979 a building permit was issued, because Phase One comes completely within the confines of the Special Permit, SP-003-77. Our foundation for Phase One is complete. It is our desire that you will grant to us this Special Permit so that we can build Phases Two and Three. Phase Two includes the covered driveway, the foyer, and the main restrooms. Phase Three includes the sanctuary and classrooms. We have done everything that we know to do to comply with the codes and 8 regulations of the City of Renton. I appeal to you, the elected officials of our community, to exercise reason and sound judgement and grant to the Renton First Church of the Nazarene Special Permit SP-433-79 A sincere thank you for your consideration in this matter. Lowell Welker, Pastor-President e io- Pt /9 ov oo I• o THE CITY OF RENTON - "' � o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAVOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXA4,NER p� O,cQ- JAMES l MAGSTADT , 235 - 259 glFD SEP1 V April 13 , 1977 Mr. Alfred Woods RE: File No. SP-003-77 President, First Church of the Nazarene 246 N. Wells Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Woods: This is to notify you that the above referenced request , which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner ' s report of March 29 , 1977 , has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance , and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing:. Sincerely , j/lei/ ) ' e James L. Mag stadt. Hearing Examiner JLM:mg cc: /Del Mead , City Clerk 1 ,1 CITY OF RE • NT` 646' - 1No: :`:.�<;.a ., FINANCE DEPARTMENT ' ..,. ` RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 1.2 .- �� 19 .7 f 'r `,,}N.. RECEIVED OF • C-'( +CJ () FI Ra r � .hi CCh'. c,f 1 Y (1.z ?Ire() e S. ti, ' TOTAL C9\f.5 � • GWEN E. MARS�� LL i F� NANCE DI RECTOR BY l.�t;C�1..� l 'tl 2 ;;' OF R4 ,4 THE CITY OF RENTON Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.NOSS atIL 0 ems CHARLES J. DELAURENTI•MAYOR S LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 42- 4)4 sEPI°1° t9 \ (1 (.2. December 3, 1979 rly, ,o,rm Members, Renton City Council CA,/,A Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-434-79; SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene Dear Council Members: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated November 21, 1979, regarding the referenced application was forwarded to Council Members on November 28, 1979 and scheduled for placement on the City Council agenda for December 10, 1979. On December 3, 1979, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk within the 14-day appeal period. ' A copy of the appeal letter is attached for your review prior to rescheduling of the application on the City Council agenda of December 17, 1979, If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. . Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachments pF Rom' v 41 S1 THE CITY OF RENTON ,� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o °��' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD 1 � CITY CLERK 0 6 ,Q'4-0 SE PI& December 3, 1979 APPEAL FILED BY RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner ' s Decision Dated November 21 , 1979, Renton First Church of the Nazarene Rezone, R-434-79, Special Permit, SP-433-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the public records office this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of December 17, 1979 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON ditzte4; Q7 .6 Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st A Lowell Welker 6906 So. 129th Pl . Seattle, WA 98178 Robert Zanoni 508 West Main Auburn, WA 98002 Renton Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Ave. NE Renton, WA 98055 pF - v **, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U \/ Q 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 A 6 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD .1),o CITY CLERK OTFO SEPI��� December 4, 1979 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is. a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and - not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on th 4th day of December, 1979, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, Rezone R-434-79, and Special Permit SP-433-79. Delores A. Mead; City lerk S SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 4th day of December, 1979. A Notary Public in and_for the State of Washington, residing in King County st Renton City Council _ 12/17/79 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT - Continued Special Permit Pastor Lowell Welker, First Church of Nazarene, thanked Granted SP-433-79Ithe Council for action regarding special permit request. Release of Gary Strother, W.R.V. Corporation, 400 108th Ave. NE, Bellevue, Easement representing owner and developer of a 45 unit apartment (High- NE 12th St. and land Park Apartments) at 12th and Lynnwood,, requested Council Lynnwood NE authorize the vacation of sewer easement which is no longer required due to re-routing. Strother also explained that sale of the property has been arranged and must have the easement' removed before title can be conveyed. Public Works Director Gonnason explained the need for authorization to release the easement and used map to explain need. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENT. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND TRIMM, TRANSFER $10,000 FROM CONTIN- Canine Unit GENCY FUND FOR CANINE UNIT, PURCHASE OF DOG, TRAINING OF Authorized OFFICER,' ADJUSTMENT OF CAR AND REFER THE MATTER TO..THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Lt. Perssons noted the training cost of $1 ,825 including transportation, is included in the $10,000 budget. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Delaurenti Council President Shinpoch presented presented Mayor Delaurenti Honored with with a gift from the Council Members expressing- honor for Crystal Decanter' the 372 years service to the City as Councilman and Mayor. c Mayor Delaurenti received a standing ovation. Beth Campbell Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes noted meeting re the Traffic Accident Beth Campbell letter request for change in law concerning with Bicycle. reporting of traffic accidents; that this is a civil .matter, 12/3 Referral and City Attorney Warren is responding. Noted for the record as requested by Councilman Hughes. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee Report requesting a.' public hearing be set for February 4, 1980 regard- Honey Creek ing the proposed ordinance relating to facility and trunk con Trunk Line nection charges and establishing a trunk line service charge Ordinance and trunk line service, area in the Honey Creek and Kennydale Public Hearing areas, The ordinance also establishes the amount of connection 2/4/80 charge and allowances for annual cost-of living increases. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Vouchers The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval for payment of Vouchers 26079 through 26247 in the amount of $613,883.57 having received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways, and Means Committee report recommended second and final Committee Report readings of an ordinance changing the payment of social security tax permitting exclusion of such payment on account Ordinance #3383 of illness or disability. Following readings, it was MOVED Change in FICA BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL Re Sick Pay CALL: 6-AYE: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, PERRY, HUGHES, CLYMER TRIMM. CARRIED. Ordinance #3386 The committee recommended first reading and advancing to second CETA Funds and final readings of an ordinance for appropriation and transfer from unanticipated revenue and Comprehensive Employ- ment Training Fund (CETA) to CETA Divisions in the amount of $45,277. Following first reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record, payment is 1979 expenditure, not 1980. Renton City Council 12/17/79 Page 4 Ordinances. and Resolutions - Continued First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first readings f•r Setbacks the following ordinances: An ,ordinance was read amending the building code re setba•ks defining single family residential. development. MONIED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3387 An ordinance was read deleting Chapter 10 of Title X Repeals . Traffic of City Code relating to negligent driving, reckl :ss Reckless and driving and driving while intoxicated. MOVED, BY CLYMER, Negligent Driving SECOND BY SHINPOCH, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND A D While Intoxicated FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, MOVED BY CL MER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Committee Chairman Clymer noted change -in state law with mandatory one day jail sentence. Ordinance #3388 An ordinance was read adopting state statutes by referenc: re Menacing and criminal enforcement of restraining orders, criminal .atte pt, Harassment criminal solicitation and criminal conspiracy and adding sections to Police Regulations of the City Code re menaci g and harassment. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, SUS'END ' RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READI GS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUIHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ.. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARR ED. Resolution #2311 The committee recommended reading and adoption 'of the fol owing Joint Resolution resolution: A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor 'o ` Renton/Tukwila execute a joint resolution between the City of Tukwila an. Grady Way Bridge City of Renton re Grady Way B'ri'dge Replacement. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following business is adopted by one motion which follows the items included: Renton Village Letter from the Board. of Public Works Director Gonnason Rescinding recommended rescinding of easements which had been grantee Easements in 1965 for sanitary sewer trunk and lateral lines. The (Quit Claim Deed) letter recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign necessary papers for rescission as requested by Renton Village Co. , 15 S. Grady Way. Concur. ' Benaroya Letter from Jack A. Benaroya Co. , 5950 Sixth Ave. S. , Seattle, Interties summarized the history of installation of two water syste interties at Renton-Kent SW 43rd St. and Lind SW and Renton - Tukwila West Valley Hwy. in August 1978. The letter repo ted direct costs for installations $91 ,621 and proposed to transfer Ownership of these intertie systems to the City as a gene al benefit to the City at a price of $45,000. The letter noted that if the City chooses not to acquire these systems, thy will be removed and easements revoked so as to recoup val e of meters and vaults. Refer to- the Utilities Committee a d Public Works Department. Court Case Superior Court Summons and Complaint filed by State of Wa-h- State re Vehicle ington vs City of Renton, Homeco, Inc. in amount of $3,0041 for loss of State Patrol vehicle which was lost on 4/23/7: in pursuit of stolen vehicle and went over embankment and into trees at end of Cedar Ave. S. The suit alleged inad:quate and/or improper signing and absence of a barricade on Cedar S. Refer to City Attorney. Appropriation Letter from Finance Director Marshall requested an ordina ce Request for CETA appropriating and transferring $45,277 for Comprehensive Employment Training Fund (CETA) in order to keep the .CETA budgetary fund solvent. Letter noted CFTA regulations ha e , changed since the 1979 budget was adopte.4., Refer to the Ways and Means Committee. (See Ordinance ;'3386 i'<* a 3) Renton City Council 12/17/79 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued ' SE Quadrant Letter from Planning Director Ericksen explained the update Comprehensive of the area Comprehensive Plan, both negative and positive Plan, Area "C" aspects and recommended moderate expansion of the Land Use Continued Plan to include low density and medium density to the south and - east of the Valley General Hospital to insure managed growth of area. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Council recessed at 8:30 p.m. and re- con' ened at 8:40 p.m. All Council Members present at Roll Call . Continued Letters of protest were read opposing multi-family residential ' south of the area proposed by Planning Commission from: Nancy Purcell and Clyde C. Medlock, 1006 S. E. . 192nd; also from Barbara Fenkner, 10015 SE 192nd; Kenneth W. and JoAnne Powell , 19027 102nd -SE; Stefan and Shirley Miller, 10204 SE 192nd St. , G. Warren and R. Elaine Diamond, 4914 Talbot Rd.S. ; Mr. and Mrs. Robert D. Wilson,' 720 S. 55th St. ; Josephine and John A. Wilson, 9403 S. 192nd St. Continued Planning Director Ericksen explained the present and recommended comprehensive plan Planning Department Dave Clemens used walls maps and pointed out various growth items. MOVED. PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, RECESS. CARRIED. All present Roll Call . 10:08 p.m. Audience Audience Comment: Speaking in favor of expanded multi-family Comment residential (south of the area proposed in the Planning Com- mission recommendation) to S. 192nd St. : John Tynes, Harbor Investments, Arrowhead Developments, Federal Way. MOTION BY, PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, GRANT ADDITIONAL TIME BEYOND THE FIVE MINUTE LIMITATION. CARRIED. Slide presentation by' Ed Unger, Harbor Investments, Federal Way; Fred Bowser, 16044 16th SW, Seattle; Nat Washington, 170 Mercer St. , Seattle; Recommended Plan Darrel Connell , R&M Co. , 3468 West Marginal Way, Seattle; Ferd 205 Acres: Reichlin at 13033 15th SW, Burien; Douglas Morrel , 4614 Talbot Rd.S. Public Presons present speaking in favor of Planning Commission Plan C: & Quasi 33 Acres Bob Wilson, 720S. 55th St. ; Nancy Purcell , 10006, SE 192nd; Single Family Grover Shegrud, 4518 Talbot Rd.S. ; Roy Fournier, 4700 Talbot Rd. 125 Acres S. ; Warren Diamond 4914 Talbot Rd.S. ; ElaineDiamond presented Low Density MF petition bearing 14 signatures of area residents requesting the 15-20 Acres Council acceptance of Commission Plan C. Art Peterson, 4915 Medium Density Talbot Road S. opposed multi-family residential designation 25-30 Acres MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY, PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. . CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ACCEPT RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Time: 11 :08 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENT MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE AGENDA ITEM 9.a. TO BE READ AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. First Church of Letter from Hearing Examiner Kaufman called attention to the Nazarene November 21 , 1979 recommendation regarding First Church of Rezone R-434-79 the Nazarene Rezone R-434-79 and Special Permit SP-433-79 SP-433-79 property located in the vicinity of 850 Union Ave. NE, just and north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Appeal Ave. NE; request for rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 and special permit to construct a church and associated educational facility. The Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the rezone and denial of the special permit. The letter reported appeal was filed within the 14-day period. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted Planning and report concurring with the recommendation of the Land Use Development i Hearing Examiner for approval of rezone for First Church of Committee Report the Nazarene R-434-79 and recommended the City Council reverse the Examiner's recommendation andgrant the' Special Permit Rezone R-434-79 1 SP-433-79 ! SP-433-79 based on errors of fact and law concerning Conclusions No. 6 and No. 10 re 100 ft. setback requirement. MOVED BY PERRY,. SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. - RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 17 , 1979 Municipal Buil • ing 14on-dai , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Cham• er. s M I N U T .E S , CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance t• the flag and called the meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SH.INPOCH, Council President; RICHARD M. STREDIC E, COUNCIL GEORGE J . PERRY, ROBERT J . HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM. ABSENT: CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE. GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; SHA' ON GREEN, Personnel Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Di ector; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; WARREN GONNASO , Public Works Director; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Ass . JAMES MATTHEWS, Fire Department; DONALD PERSSON, Police De.t. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES of DECEMBER 12, 1979 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL AWARD Mayor Delaurenti presented Special Award to George Perry for 16 years outstanding service to the community as Councilma . PUBLIC HEARING This being the date' set and proper notices having been pos ed, L. I .D. #315 published and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti Sidewalks opened the public hearing continued from November. 19, 1979 Senior Citizen to consider Local Improvement District No. 315 to construc Housing Area and install concrete sidewalks on the east side of Burnet Burnett Ave. S. Ave. S. between S. 2nd St. northerly to a point 88.5 feet -north of the north margin of S. Tobin St. ; assessment roll in the amount of $23,936..84. Letter from Public Works Dir-ctor Gonnason reported that McLendon Hardware Co. has installed a portion of the improvements originally scheduled as part o LID #315, that deletion and review reduce the remaining wo k to estimated cost of $9,390 and front foot from $25.7385 t. $14,9048. The assessment of Minnie Ellison' s property wou d be reduced from $1 ,286.93 to $745.24. The letter noted th- City Attorney is reporting on deferred payment of assessme t for low-income senior citizens. The letter noted unsucces-ful attempt to locate other monies; and also recalled letter o 3/8/79 noting' Council may wish to consider appropriating f nds to participate in this program to further reduce assessmen s. City Attorney Warren explained statutory method whereby th- city can defer assessments for economically disadvantaged property owners until time of dissolution of the LID when say- ment must be made in full , or at time of sale. Continued Minnie Ellison, 88 Burnett Ave. S. , inquired re interest a d was advised of need for annual payment of interest; also r- driveway cut and was advised of $50 to $100 additional cos . Mrs. Ellison did not withdraw her protest; also re stumbli g block of raised sidewalk and was advised lot would be buil up. Standards for poor and affirmed were discussed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, CITY AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO PROCEED WITH PROJECT AND CALL FOR BIDS KEEPING IN MIND DEFERRAL OF ASSESSMENTS ON THIS ITEM AND REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Scout Troup Scout Troup No. 490 was welcomed to the meeting along with Mr. Johnson, Adviser. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Southeast published and mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public h-ar- Quadrant ing to consider appeal of Planning Commission recommendati .n Comprehensive for Southeast Comprehensive Planning Area, Area "C" South .f Plan the Valley General Hospital ; hearing requested and set ll_/+6/79. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT - 4 DECEMBER 17, 1979 FIRST CHURCH. OF THE NAZARENE (R-434-79, SP-433-79) The --Planning and Development Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for approval of a rezone from G to R-l . The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above- mentioned recommendation dated November 21 , 1979, and recommends that the City . Council reverse the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner and grant the special permit requested, based upon the following errors of fact and law: 1 . Conclusion No. 6 is in error in that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed church complies with the various ..requirements of Section 4-706(3) (a) . 2. Conclusion No. 10 is in error in that the Zoning Code requires a 100 foot setback between proposed churches and lots which are developed with single family residences. The Committee recommends that the City Council reverse the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner in relation to the special permit , and that the City Council grant the special permit. (5/ • George Perry, Chairman Barbara Shinpoch I �I • / 4 / / \ FROM: CITY CLERK DAiE: // 2q ? / TO: (24 4-68 -YLe--, ATTACHED IS: ea, (1-->ix2_. 7 riAi61 avid FOR: 64,4-14-a fi) R E 0 we..., C I R K voAm:N kELOGG By CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. . 3392 AN ORDINANCE OR "THE CITY ;OF,;',RENTON,,WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING '`CLASS,IFICATION ,OF',CERTAIN" PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL' CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT. (G-1) TO _SJBualet ,li RESIDENCE NO. 1 (SR-1) R-434=.79 (First Church of the Nazarene) WHEREAS under Chapter.7, Title IV (Building Regulations).of..Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of;General Ordinances of the City of. Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property • hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District • (G-1); and ' WHEREAS,a proper petition for;change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about October 8, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been:held thereon on or about October 30, 1979, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as;amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant'thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: \ ' SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is \� • hereby rezoned to Mutton? Residence No. 1 (SR-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated November 21, 1979; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended,,Co evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit '!A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at vicinity of 850 Union Avenue N.E., just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 14ttday of January, 1980. Delores A.Mead', City Cle APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14tbday of January, 1980. Barbara i':lishicnppdti;,:;Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. War n, City Attorney Date of Publication: January 23, 1980 Ordinance No. 3392 page 2 • • FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE :'s.•`,'` FILE NUMBER: R-434-79 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The north half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the c ,! northwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North; Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington: Except the south' 110 feet thereof, and except that portion lying•within 132nd,Ave. S.E. (Union Ave. N.E.) ... • ��✓. it', �1,', • • \ \. l L.�r L..i a i—. (...J .U .L.i Lod_ ' Y;' •} ^-l"r.'�- - . . ';. :: ' :.-- ,i'...'', 0 D D C3 El zt*7% Lri o o c 3 o a o o j 0,._, ,ito 0 a! , . . [1 ficr:1 ti 0 .. . . • .----J DI • P---1 ''''"1.—.----0 a. • • ,yy,,rx i..�•;f • '•.• a , la IYaJ re ima tJ1.ta q ea lSa Y�i . 'i•.' • a o rr"o ,I`va iSF. ''r66o . niSi .P.C a S " S.f. sf. • ® 3:G. L'L7l. se' clTy �1Ml1 , 3.- .. a,.d�..o orb a p..�. • .- .1,1i'' ".��: •SY7 (4^ FY..k ;�;lVi:itll;�jv +''l'(s{t .'1"i' " 1�FFea .. 4( :r 1 •,'.•-`1' Y:'; .. ,, j,'..4,r^: .'` , . ; ' :: ' - V �'` ':Y, ` �t, •,iy. r:',s:'1 , ^,• . o % '0:` ;: .•.:k 41�' -;..i:',-i,:-'; ;r`f.;, 'ar * }(: ,I 9 :Vie '• a,jin iai: '7�';�) �:3''rl}airy ;'i: .'�',,�f• ,i 7:'.�0 �. '.f':'i'' ! traits.s9'_ u1 . Q I/algy p: v , O I • L� �_ . Girl LIr.'3rf5 . i 'Q. L'l �....,la ea) ..=a o a• C a.:,o C'^.,O,1`=.100 t.:::7 Cr:DO S .EC'I eaen=ea gip co®[:cram O /Lt:y 0 j � • ' '/782 0 -1 �i �s�or i1 1 f� • ammo �� . n ° 11 ❑ • • Scree !"D boa' 5u6,11cr SJgg [D . • • • • figir uru o,F • • • • SP- 133.71 R-434-79 ` - 1 OF R.4,4 A THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oml CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 9 co• 1 1,:b.Lra Y. ti4:'1 npocit, Mayor CITY CLERK O9,gTED SEP1OtA January 17, 1980 Lowell D. Welker, Pastor Renton Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Avenue North East Renton, Wa. 93055 • RE: Ordinance No. 3392 (Rezone 434-79) ' Dear Pastor Welker, The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, January 14, 1980 . has adopted Ordinance No. 3392. • A copy is enclosed for your information. • Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON • • Delores A. Mead, C.N. C. City Clerk DAM: jebl'db Enclosure 1 I ' r)r)t)L-- r.3q 77 Renton City Council 1/14/80 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT - Continued Council Position Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. SE, urged appointment of George Perry to the vacant Council position. Sewer Problems Sandy Webb told of serious problems to newly installed sanitary sewer in Heather Downs area, noting deficiency in design. Webb noted disappointment that City Fire Department did not respond but that sewer crew located obstruction. Mayor Shinpoch noted response to Mr. Webb would be forthcoming from the appropriate department.. Water Problems Rosalie Loby, 2709 Talbot Rd. S, reported water damage to their property by sheet of water from across Talbot Rd, morning of 1/12/80. Mrs. Loby noted aid from Fire Department for her neighbor to the south; also recalling history of the water problem in area,, placement of berm and asked solution. Mayor Shinpoch noted Public Works Director. Gonnason would have com- pleted report next Monday. Water Problems Fred Krebs, 2703 Talbot Rd. S, reported serious water and mud damage to home from development across street with 1 - l ft. mud and water roaring through his home, noting help from neighbors and Fire Dept. Councilman Clymer requested report from Public Works Department. OLD BUSINESS Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Trimm submitted report Committee Report of.. 12/1.7 bid opening and recommended acceptance of bid sub- Signal Controller mitted by Signal Electric, Inc. in amount of $12,704.30, Replacement at concurring in recommendation of the Public Works Department. SW Sunset and MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, ACCEPT COMMITTEE REPORT AND Langston Road AWARD CONTRACT, CARRIED. Thanks Councilman Hughes expressed thanks to City Department staff Extended for refreshments at the 12/27/79 Council installation and to Judge Shellan for administering the oath of office. Wells Ave. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER, TO REMOVE FROM THE TABLE THE Bridge SUBJECT OF THE WELLS AVE. BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR DISCUSSION. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Report Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer recommended second Ordinance 13389 reading and adoption of an ordinance which had been placed on Comprehensive first reading 11/5/79; Public Hearing and approval 12/17/79; Plan SE Quadrant approving the Comprehensive Plan and maps for the Southeasterly portJon of the City. Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: Ordinance #3390 TRIMM, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER; ONE ABSTENTION: SHANE. CARRIED. See 1/21/80 Minutes Ordinance. #3391 The Ways and Means Committee recommended that the following ordi- Abandoning nances be placed first -reading, suspension of rules, second and Condemnation final readings: Following first reading of ordinance abandon- Parker Property ing condemnation proceedings for Parker property, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. The ordinance was read abandoning condemnation proceedings on marsh and trail property along Cedar River. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIE . Ordinance #3392 Ordinance read changing the zoning classification of property Rezone ' known as First Church of the Nazarene from G-1 to Suburban First Church o Residence SR-1 for property located 850 Union NE, north of Nazarene Honeydew Elementary School. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIE . Following readings of ordinance for Rezone 434-79, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: - . ALL AYES. CARRIED. Renton City Council 1/14/80. Page 4 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3393 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final Building readings of an ordinance (first reading' 12/17/79) amendin. Setbacks a portion of the Building Regulations relating to setback- of structures. Following readings, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECO D ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A ES. CARRIED. First Readings The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading an. referral back to the Ways and Means Committee of theefoll.wing ordinances: An Ordinance establishing a Cumulative Reserve Fund for Library Facilities, Improvements and Construction, was rea. . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE CARRIED. An ordinance was read establishing a new fund to be know as the South End Fire Station Construction Fund. MOVED B CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTE: CARRIED. An ordinance was read ordering construction of LID #315, providing for payment and bonds; sidewalks in area of east side of Burnett Ave. S. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE,WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #2312 The committee recommended reading and adoption of followi g Bank resolutions: A resolution was read establishing bank deposi- Depositories tories and authorizing signatures of Director of Finance, Mayor and Deputy Finance Director. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECO D TRIMM., ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2313 A resolution was read transferring funds for the Police P,:trol Transfer Funds Division for Canine Unit in amount of $8,791 . MOVED BY CL MER, Police K-9 SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Uniformed Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer recalled 1/3/80 Management Council referral re benefits for uniformed management Personnel ' and Resolution #2233 12/4/78 establishing pay differentia s Longevity for Uniformed Officers, that during . 1980 budget hearings Council provided funds for Police Officer longevity recei ed by other uniformed personnel through negotiations; Admini .tra- tion request to hold-off until, study completed. Ways and ` Means Committee Chairman recommended no action be taken o this matter pending report from Administration to the committe- . Captain Phelan spoke on behalf of seven Police Officers, expressed disappointment and problems relating to non-pay ent of budgeted longevity, and asked correction of discrepancies by re-establishing parity. Chairman of the. Ways and Mean. Committee requested the matter be discussed at the Commit ee of the Whole meeting and the Administrative report be mad- to that body. Voucher The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment Payment of Vouchers 26253 through 26441 in amount of $216,067.39 (No. 26248 - 26252 machined voided) plus LID #302 Revenue Warrant R-49 $4,736.37 and Cash Warrant C-118 in amount o, $4,736.37; plus LID #307 R-11 amount of $1 ,502.52 and C-1. $1 ,502.52. The Committee also recommended approval for payment of Vouchers 26447 through 26499 in amount of $173,938.86 having received departmental certification that merchandi.e and/or service have been rendered. (Machines voids 26442 26446) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE PAYMENT", CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which folio s: Insurance Letter from Mayor Shinpoch presented letters from Miller .nd Coverage for Morris, loss assessors, and Vice President of the Renton Police Punitive Damages Officers Guild pertaining to claims against City employees for punitive damages, Refer to Committee of the Whole. oF R4, s?, `sq 0 0 11 THE CITY OF RENTON t$ . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 ma 0 mno CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 9 c3- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 • 47' 0 SEPle° January21, 1980 Reverend Lowell Welker • 6906 S. 129th Place • Seattle, WA 98178 RE: File No. R-434-79, SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene; • Request for Rezone and Special Permit. Dear Revekend Welker: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests were approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of January 14, 1980 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3392. Sincerely, • Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner • cc: Planning Department . City Clerk 11 -A/ :` c), Form 81 :+ +_n t' �1 i' • Affidavit of Pub: cation �J��, 7)1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, i C,VC � an�, COUNTY OF KING, �� ,,,` r.e �,�a�% C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State;that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that/the • annexed, being a retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the regular and entire issue of said paper on the following day or days January 23 , 1980 Ordinance No. 3392 and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. . 7.7. . `'CITYOP RENTON,'wASHt't `T "'7 ;,, ORDINANCE NO..3392 , "- = 4N ORDINANCE DR THE CITY OF-:RENTON, ' .-WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSI- :FICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN ' ;THE CITY OF"RENTON FROM GENERAL CLAS- g.-- - •'"SIFICATION DISTRICT (G•1)TO SUBURBAN RESIDENCE NO. 1-ISR•1) R-13.-7.9 (First Church k. Of the Nazarene) ' ,' •. .,. ..`- , p. - WHEREAS under Chapter 7,Title IV(Building "Regulations) of Ordinance No.1628 known as the' Subscribed and sworn to before me this Fifteenth a "Code of Generol Ordinances of the City of'Ran-,. ay ;t-ton,"as(intended,and the maps and reoortt adopt- ' ed in conjunction therewith;the property hereinbe-' of Ap r i 1- ' 1c S 0 :low described has heretofore been zoned as Genor- 1/ 01 Classification District<G-1)i and /' .ice WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone �A��Tfi�L _ n '" 10 cicissltication of-sold property has been filed with �'G(� �Q"l�1' zi:::the Planning Department:on or about October 1s, • Hefty 7 Public In for the/ e of Washington •,)979,which petition was'duly referred taunt he Hear•- r'' Inc Exominer tar investla(ition, study. d public- rum., of e t 'flooring,'and 0 public hearing-having been held • ', 'fhereon.on or(itloui.October�,1979;and sold mat-. ' ter having been.duly cbncidered by the Heorine. Examiner and said.zoning request being In con--. i, formtty with the City:e Comprehensive Plan, as,, p' ➢mended,and the City Council having duly consid•