Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA79-456
BEGINNING OF FILE p FILE TITLE g • p / ROFILMED 45 1P1m Z 9 err � . , :., ,'..:�i.c• • i ,t";� ,,.''.4 M ^t'j! � wii•f 4 P Tai ..:'c,. , .3 • rfl.� ,�1 K+ l { +aS49 s.r! tti s 7N rt ; „i4°"" , .;L •. • L1•*.•,i '.3.1` ip} 1't# Y Hi �. rIi- ipli 'l'k kr• kr ' 9{y` s} !4{t;' :• -}• : ,. ..;.i iZ' > � ' fi' 6# ��L �0 ,gy.y r ^r• �6., ,;r} 4 . ;'.r., ''c'''.r . •.y': u'.''5 �;, y .l � " ' g ' `4 y t1s , I ';'?• I✓.�'r.,t.; :-., vq • i- 4 '� •1ry A3r ft ,.'t'< i .+:;3,A # l aa . : \ i ' ' , � '�{" t.;-:,t�. ;' ' . t � • • • �"re.;'?4•4„ i.; ,i.vi,. F„' 3 fY .. 14. -.'t'``i•�W"+ ?4Sr ; � t ,:�4�h1,`4 '... .ih�*:,;e"2F{rr.y•,•Yr.ga,t.l"'=r' '. : ;;"i:: S %AA r1:gf'7+ s,,�a 4 a� �, ? ',..;1.!'�wW,•;-.4XfN•iSwi .F�l. , `:. 4 ;`i .L.I;s;;}ts 'rP 'i'tit 'ari: 1s -�i �,r'� §a -ia,{ )k a yfi Ci .- + yos ! � g�-41 .'`i: N,;Y'�gt r.'I,C.'.,.' :r 'C .;t;7�1:,;,' wt+iyY ;.?g` 3rs„ a� ,y K,r ° � '", YMI rv ='o�.,. re, �- . 4r.r.g :-C,,! ;4.4. \11: t � `4';'; :1•S'" Ff:01 ���tl • �, f'' ♦ r-:,,,,I �r F 6e w•"t:.;.'??...4.: ,; ', : :'Lnri' , %ir Yjlet-1�i "Y;qr �4Z::eiW" ie 9 :rn (eat t„'' s.a• . �t;„ ) 3�-+ } i - 56 ' ,,.p� .4 '}r,*ri.,' yt`r :0':L, y:Gt fi ?;4. n.. :.:uq, �+s 5. D:3re+�V' ii4k-�J� �, � �V ,t.4�:C7' �rt 4, �}rf -.}. ',`.',rr, r• , • ... ems.' {i,=^i : •:t1:i,. P.-�..rw�0:Nz:A ,;rot;S i '!w ,4Y'* 'P ;'-.+'SAt-i�{ar"`r,.4 Ifit wse`f f"Y, � - tA3u56�.� �A":i:•.1.i', . �', • ‘1;'�i:.;r1i ,r+t;P. bT,{i : ;r1,: . ,,,RR cH' I � t ,;I: k}1{ gea'i s+h.'r;1 5 ;j.;; ,. ry, :r^;'r aIn4119,*.n,-LL, S�rr';',: r;,i.,. . 11 1,�, dfi^. k „q„Sr�F4{tb .;,}a., .i".` 'y:,FM•4...-t,.}K.� ;•.;p gLi,.k,,pt;.,:�3•>.:n,,;r�1, a/b ei, :',.', k . t ;, . ,•aOt'lE,as:,,�;a. n, ;is.,.)<,,•.�r$aq..',. s;e: :a«,,1 ;>";:,,,,,,•, - ;I.{r-_,.Y.:i�., ;1.#Ih^'.fCr.,dhrt,5,., '( ,a„ ,�_ . ts," ` h ; _' rar5ufht-?a..»:.}.'.t ,�'.sea.�irfi h„" y.'^dv•. . r !,n a,t. r7Yt,, j>N• • • • • • • • • • • J " c� • FILE !3 `�U, 5E '' • PROPERT`( LOCATION • 5(.titl5 • APPLICATION FO�i: • REZONE G-ERP�• T0�— ❑ SPECIAL PIT ❑ SITE • ❑ MOBILE APPROVAL HOME PARK • [] SPECIAL USE ❑ PUD , ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT ❑ FINAL PLAT , • [: VARIANCE ❑. COMP. LAND USE PLAN CHANGE----- ACTI NiAJGx41iwEiP /„ -80 i /�I� " AT1 „ S TE---- CITY C^L r` '' , ,„ -:;.y D. . - DATE !. . _. • I.I; R Ni -- ;'. g::ra • • • • • • • • si. :Wa� 'a;1;n, a$., i•. �,.t 'i" - xk. • ` "i.�Sti •S :{f_ ;c'*�1, Z.r �� �" rV VS E9 'd• 2ary l !i! v•a• tea.` .,s>'a":�1 v ;�z l' R. ti Fc' S .ate '; ;r,<�. F'1, a: r',,.a t Y, �. 'In - . • 'tr ' wt 9 ..yi�x �:��, r. `t ��i�5��� ,i ti,ts"1�� Y�In l ''S ^4 .1. :w° , r Y .,� :q, t3.:., am i;} 4. • "•✓„`',,::�+ X '%vim w{ a f� CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3403 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CPPY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM CIFNER AT, CI,ASSTFTCATTON DISTRICT(G) •'B0,*BUSINESS. DISTRICT (B-1) • ICI NEIL R-46.6-79 WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as • amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property • has been filed with the Planning Department on or about December 13, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about January 15, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated January 23, 1980; the Planning Director is • l hereby authorized and directed'to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: ' See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E.) • • o • • • SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 3rd day of March , 1980. da—€.o 6i) 0 Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY.THE MAYOR this 3rd day of March 1980. bonQrtuxr.0.4• .tiancOClN Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warr6/n, City Attorney Date of Publication: March 12, 1980 Ordinance NO. 3403 page 2 Shannon O'Neil Rezone R-456-79 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ordinance No. 3403 Tract 4 and 4A of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts. According to the plat recorded in Volume 38 of Plats, Page 30, Records of King County, Washington except portion for State Highway and except portion described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly margin 138th Ave. S.E. with a line 155 feet northwesterly as measured at right angles to centerline of Pacific State Highway No. 2 (SR 900) , thence N. 76-26-00 E 110 feet; thence S. 13°34'00" E 110 feet to the northerly margin said highway; thence S. 76°26'00" W 5.79 feet; thence S. 84°57'51" W 101.12 feet; thence N. 25-38-11 W 67.15 feet; thence N. 04°58'22" E 30.94 feet to the point of beginning. 4 ..‘ * . EXHIBIT "B" Ordinance No 3403 • i , 6,:=0..grt.u.T.u..1.27..7.,....^Efr GO 5,2 sms cssz.ea;Wirt ;....H.:. 'i- ....-.. -. ttf .1 '1•,:i. - r : •• ; , • i:9 ; ti-fil'i'1 i. I igll ; r_1 :211 .....—... . I—•!,.sL:..!T., .:''..._. 0 e.11 • e s • oil. e e s ,,A .r ...• i_.—ii.,. . ,,,.; .. : .• . : • . 0 Pi :01'''•5. 7.:,1- ' • .i. i. I.... 1:0 p ZWAT.1.1=.1IINTATILUITI 1,n j.'' li•' I • • 13 r 7 • :. .0 I •st •1.11..U,., .1;e•IS.r..,.!;, ..". 1.."J..:1.ftL..II-.1..1.71"...:.1...___J t !..-=.4=4..V0,:.=haraal n r. • — " I Y I , 11,41,V.,. 14/'.• •, , I• ,Is'. .4.. " I. 8 , 6 . '•C...'' 1"Kii..7'-LCI"1"2'k.L.,, ..., . .4_ ,.irtA.. ._...1T...7__ I •• • an , U 1 1: . . ..1 0 F . CD 62 0.11121.111•3 Me its1.11, . . . .-.-.... .. I. . -1 5.• . . ......L., ,/,•N.,...'-k!.-4.1.'1.,1...I..17.1.4.71-"!) I' ' .1---11 11 . •,.- _ P.,5•0, :ILL I; 1 ...... f a 11 3.---"•-, 1 "• ti4; .•••A-.'"...1::11.?.y"!7*.'‘P:°•/='.-;').-f' ii. _ .,..7 ...... , . ,,„,.. c,.... .,...,7 ..4-, ...i iZ , .4.-,''z-,,' ','•‘3: \ I I il 8 ..-I.Ir. . ...o.rr.„-.:::,., 4,,,, ,,. , , s. •., ,...,cynA c=z,..=,....4$1, S661.-'1c C ri ,•a .1.,.1. . ;ir.,:--':, -•,- ..t.S• 14.,'.•,,z9, \,,,;),,.,. UK' 14. . '•-•;:,-tt- - : B.:'-z •'.;A:..1',...;',.Sti'M''\% /,',4!!:...;,..Ze i NA \ \ 0- A.-) 1' . ---1-(*.--i-1.11-1..,7i•> /'-'.- ---71;r' .1-.4..i4.1'S.D ..,!ttii. , 0 • 1.1 e....-:-0 • ' . U,;' I , c......=tmer ---;,.. Jtrar.ss,1 , CV 1:72,CC? Cr.1 SIL-. 11 7................ l• 1 • . 0 i ! • , ,e J a [ -P•t•, .:---. 31 1 1 N\ 1 ,:-.;.7 .,•'.. . . ''''-....__. pfq.." 2° ,r3) i . ....••I T. 0 .:,P:, •''''''..b•Sti• r a ••••. g --•-'''''' 11 -- ...., ' t LI.alma e.eas,• 1.:.••>i.,1• •.Inaa', :• co 1.I•°1a'1)'-....TI./_--.:--:..2,-1- -‘.'.‘-cj.---1--.-.-•-.-i.•C-L2_,;;:.,.-.D,i,kj...,z.„,.,,-.,,)"-t0•t*.,;L-4:,,il. .,•..„..„'.--..,..-, __7__:_'-' i„0 •• j,''... °LgI B I , , I . t - 1 B 4 ==17=1Z .=e..1.c...= ..R".”---`:....!. .-.).5 Ii_ . _.........r I'-i-•-..1.iI,' ..,. • ..,., .,„..,..‘„,.....1, NCR23 B . . ! ,•A, ___A 5 ink ea E''''I.•s"' . 3 1 ' ' , 1,----- .. la.- ft'i i c.C4': ',..Txr.,•••••••anzlre,""'"."74 - • .' " 11 .- • • • , . . • . 1 .r 4 . • . G - it:'-'i , .• ,, 7 271 ', .,4••.-• . ..":.'r". ,..;;;I:i 1..i, •ii,......,:i,L, ,,I, I .. ...:,, . • . ha 0 ,..-,e,r • ':_---__.a°- ,?rL.' 3;rt '• ,.. 'F-•=23-1_,_, 1L3ILIE4+'""."11:?•••• 5:`..k i ,. . . • I, •'.....r\ ,1 ‘:: .S. ,. :6'',5' 'IA %. -- " - • •••••". . '• a• ' .1 • '`..,J.4 i I".. *- ' ''','?,,,,'E,''Tg-y ..F4.. zi , ,,,,,, - - r• ' 1 'Th° '' ...S....Tit ..•, . •...,...,:: .. . . . , . .1 . „.._.„ .,„......„ .,, .,:;,,., ,....,... ui, , 4, „ ,...„._,,.„ :•• : , , , ,, , . , 3 i • . . • . . r.....r..f-tr.'1.-, P&.52TM 7 , i . 1 .11 .,. 1... II : • -1 1, . . , 2----1_,_,J '•':'.% 1 •1 I VP'''.74 11 1 , „L•4••• 1 k.vil`•0 : • l' ... ' 1 . , ,•. ..-...,.....:-.,,,.,, lit'4 .......•caa a ama•aan. ! , J•--1- i I Z II-...•\ .°..1 i•i r• } , i r I ik.1/1.7:%1%. ., . ' . r • . . . 1 • 1 .,. loX):I 1 . , ,h 'to r% a 1 • , I l'4'1 .7 , L --...i •Il ! • e1.c• I . r r 11 . . . I i. -mvar,carcess=ratrar=ron (211') s :.5 .• i ! . 1 I 1 . . SHANNON 0' NEIL . R-456-79 4 •. . l . • . • i . , ,1 • . -- .--. .......-- --..-......-...i • • OF R.4,4, A • 4, o THE CITY OF RENTON t$ ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ail rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD D90 Co• Barbara 1. `Sh3.npoch CITY CLERK 0IT�D SEP�E���P March 6, 1980 • Shannon O'Neil 5911 119th SE Bellevue, Wa< 98056 RE: Ordinance No. 3403 • The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday! March 3, 1980, has . adopted Ordinance No. 3403. A copy is enclosed for—your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON • Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jplydh Enclosure OF R4, �e ° THE CITY OF RENTON ; ;=*,-`3 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA.. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 O P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 March 10, 1980 Mr. George Xenos Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 RE: File No. R-456-79; Shannon O'Neil Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Xenos: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of March 5, 1980, by adoption of Ordinance No. 3403. Sincerely, ‘ha Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Renton City Council 3/5/80 Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA - Continued Park Property Letter from Parks and Recreation Director Webley requested authorization for expenditure of $40,000 to acquire 2.53 acres property adjacent to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park (Forward Thrust Fund) from Burlington Northern. Council concur. Law and Justice Police Chief. Darby requests authorization for inter-local agreement for distribution of funds, Law and Justice Planning. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Environmental Planning Director Erickson requested ordinance providing for Ordinance Environmental Review Committee consisting of Parks Director, Planning Director and Public Works Director'. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Approval (Includes above five items.) ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch noted increase in telephone calls and requests' REPORT for assistance of needy people, and asked requests be given to Personnel Director (Social Service person) and Mayor's Office for referral to the proper agency. Low Income Mayor Shinpoch reported request from Housing Authority for Housing Resolution to obtain Federal assistance of 50-unit low income Addendum housing. Mayor recommended concurrence. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER ITEM TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Code of Ethics Mayor Shinpoch noted letter to Departments requiring enforcement of the Code of Ethics; comments invited. Board of Revision of the Board of Public Works in 1977 was noted and Public Works Mayor Shinpoch recommended no action be taken at present time. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Solid Waste Letter from Puget Sound Council of Governments, King Subregional Management Council and Solid Waste Management Board requested City partici- pation in joint preparation of revision of King County Compre- hensive Solid Waste Management Plan. The King Subregional Council of Puget Sound Council of Governments has been designated by the Governor and the Environmental Protection Agency responsi- ble for comprehensive long-range solid waste management planning in King County. The current Management Plan needs updating due to major changes in solid waste handling and all jurisdictions in King County are being asked to participate. Cost of plan revisions is budgeted at $39,000 or 3. 167t per capita; Renton's share approximately $994. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER, REFER MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. Drainage Letter from Gloria Maglietto, 2715 Talbot Rd. S. , replied to Problems letter from Public Works Director Gonnason 1/21/80 calling atten- Talbot Rd. S. tion to error in that Gonnason stated drainage system functioned adequately during December storm. Mrs. Maglietto reported that on 12/14/79 Renton Fire Department was called to assist with flood- ing at their home. Mrs. Maglietto noted Gonnason's letter claimed the City would work with the property owners to install temporary asphalt berms to guard against a reoccurrence of the flood situa- tion until the permanent improvements are installed; however, Mrs. Maglietto claimed she had received vague response in contact- ing the Engineering Department. Maglietto told of problems in selling their home because ofdrainage problems; and claimed no water or mud problems existed until the new construction ,in area was near completion. The letter asked solution be reached. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER MAGLIETTO LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR RESPONSE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Utilities Committee Members Reed and Hughes did not submit com- mittee reports, asking further meetings be held. ir.„& V-5-6 - Ways and Means Committee 3/5/80 Page 3 OLD BUSINESS - Continued - Ways and Means Committee eport - Continued Board of Ethics . The Ways and Means Committee reco ends concurrence in the Appointment Mayor's appointment of Marcia Holl nd to the Board of Et ics to complete term of Dr. Hoffman; e piration date Decembe 31 , 1980. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUG ES, CONCUR IN APPOINT ENT. CARRIED. P.U.D. Ordinance MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPME T ORDINANCE BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CO MITTEE FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY OF PLACEMEN OF P.U.D. 'S IN SINGL FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA. CARRIED. Ordinance #3403 The Ways and Means Committee recom ended second and fins readings O'Neil Rezone of an ordinance changing the zonin4 classification from to B-1 property located at the northe-st corner of NE Sunse Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE, known as the O'Neil Rezone R-456-79. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES OF COUNCIL ME BERS PRESENT. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recom ended first reading o an ordinance changing the zoning classification from GS-1 t• R-2 property located at north sid- of NE Sunset Blvd. ap•roxi- mately 170 ft. east of Newport Av- . NE. Following readi g, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER BACK TO WAYS AND M ANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3404 The Ways and Means Committee reco , ended first reading, -uspen- Gene Coulon sion of rules and final readings •f an ordinance providi g Memorial Beach for issuance and sale of $6,000,000 "Unlimited Tax Gener: 1 Park Development Obligation Park Bonds, 1980, series A." Councilman Cly er Bonds noted interest rate changed from :% to 12%. MOVED BY CL MER, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER ITEM 8.a. FROM CONSENT AGENDA TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED . Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, SUSPEND 'ULES AND ADVANCE TO SE OND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Ordinance read. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINA CE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED, Ordinance adopted. Resolution #2319 The Ways. and Means Committee reco ended reading and ado•tion Highbury Park of a resolution approving Highbur Park Final Plat FP 43:-79 Final Plat Wall and Redekop Corp. , located at northeast quadrant NE 3rd and Edmonds Ave. NE, south of NE 'th P1 . and west of Ind-x Pl . NE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGH:S, ADOPT THE RESOLUTIO AS READ. CARRIED. Reimbursement The Ways and Means Committee reco ended denial of a res•lution Denied providing reimbursement for emplo ee/council/Mayor expen-e for meals while attending business fu ctions within the City of Renton limits. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECO D CLYMER, COUNCIL CONC R. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works Department, Building Division requested funs for permit clerk due to increase in permit issuance. Refer to Way.s and Means for appropriation n amount of $11 ,982. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGE DA AND HOLD FOR ONE WEEK, CARRIED. Engineering Request from Public Works Directo for Engineering Super isor Travel and Utilities Engineer to attend uhe A.W.W.A. Conference in Vancouver, B.C. 4/16-18/80; advan•e travel funds request-d. Council concur. Final Payment Public Works Department, Engineering Division, requests inal Bronson Way acceptance and payment Bronson Wa North and South TQF 9,0(1 ) $234,366. 18 Moss Construction Co. • project accepted by P blic Works Department 2/19/80. Requesu included commencement of 30- day lien period for reimbursement of retained amount of $16,718.30 to the contractor if no liens or •laims filed and tax li -bilities paid. Council concur. Renton City Council 2/25/80 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT - Continued Renton Area in the RAYS 1980 Budget. The organization has received $10,000 Youth Services population funds and requested $5,000 from the City for 1980 Funds explaining that the King County Budget office has continually Continued mandated Youth Service Bureaus who serve a municipality show budget support from their city jurisdictions. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, REFER MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Shane submitted committee report Committee Report recommending that the Kennydale and Honeydew Interceptor Sewer Kennydale Ordinance be approved as presented. Discussion ensued. The Honeydew Sewer increase of area services from lC adding 3c ; removal of construction Interceptor financing (revenue bonds) because of possibility of raising the water and sewer rates throughout the City to guarantee the revenue bonds was discussed. Councilman Stredicke inquired for record if, Councilman Shane or family had substantial land holdings in subject area. Councilman Shane volunteered the information that he had no interest in any property in that drainage basin, nor did his children. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO REFER ORDINANCE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Clymer asked financial impact report be presented. CARRIED. Kefer Short Plat The Utilities Committee report approved a latecomer's agreement LCAG Continued as presented for the Kefer Short Plat. Due to request for renewed information, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONTINUE THE MATTER FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Public Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes presented committee Committee Report report regarding sale of controlling interest in OK Cab Inc. Sale of OK Cab as referred 2/11/80. The report stated Doretha Rood, President, OK Cab has requested matter be withdrawn from Council considera- tion as Mr. Reinhardt is unable to obtain necessary financing. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recom- Committee Report mending that the ordinance creating the Board of Public Works Board of Public (referred 3/6/78) be referred to the Administration for recom- Works mendation. MOVED BY SYREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR. CARRIED. Benefits The report recommended that the benefits for uniformed manage- Uniformed ment personnel (referred 1/3/80) be referred to the Committee Management of the Whole for consideration, including Mayor's letter of 2/20/80. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR. CARRIED. Solid Waste The committee recommended that the 1/21/80 referral for solid Disposal Rates waste disposal rate increase be referred to the Committee of the Whole for consideration. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. Councilman Stredicke requested impact of total amount of proposed increase plus costs for collection. CARRIED. Ordinance Report from the Ways and Means Committee recommended that the Revision Request request for ordinance revision from Human Rights and Affairs Human Rights Commission to meet quarterly rather than monthly, be denied and the Commission continue to meet as stat&! in City Code, further that a full progress report be submitted by the Commission to the Council in six months. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Voucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers No. 27052 through No. 27253 in the amount of $437,662.54 having received departmental certification; plus LID #302 Revenue Warrant R-52 $3,501 .51 and Cash Warrant C-124 in amount of $3,501 .51 . Machine Voids #27048 through 27051 . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR. CARRIED. A.-445`— ;77 Renton City Council . 2/25/80 . Page 4 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee Report report recommending first reading of an ordinance changing zoning First Reading classification from G to. B-1 prop:rty located northeast corner O'Neil Rezone of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall NE, known as the Shannon O'Neil R-456-79 Rezone. Following reading, it wa- MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM ITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Sewer Connection Committee Chairman Clymer reporte. the Code dealing with connec- Ordinance tion to the Public Sewer System w_s awaiting report from the Utilities Committee and the ordin.nce was removed from t e Ways and Means Committee pending futur: referral . Resolution #2318 The Ways and Means Committee reco mended reading and ado tion Fund Transfer of a resolution for transfer of $' ,018.40 for payment of remain- Glenco ing balance on purchase of the Glenco Park property. Following reading, MOVED BY SHANE-, SECOND S:COND STREDICKE, ADOPT HE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda is a.opted by one motion which follows the items included: Banking Six bids were received at 2/25/80 bid opening City of Re ton Services Banking Services. See attached t.bulation. . Refer to Fi ance Department and Ways and Means Com ittee. Demand Bank Finance Director Gwen Marshall re.uests new Demand Bank 'eposit Deposit Agreement and reported bids were spened 2/15/80 (see att.ched Agreement banking services bids) , noting Peoples Bank of Washingto is again low bidder and recommended .warding bid with Alter ate A to Peoples Bank. The letter note. the Demand Bank Deposit system has been beneficial and resulted in cost savings and flewibility in the City's investment operatio ). Refer to Ways and M-ans Committee for necessary documents. Final Payment Letter from Public Works Departme t requested final acceptance LID #302 as of 12/15/79 LID #302 Lind Ave. SW, Contract B, Coluc io Construction Co. , Seattle. Relea-e of retained amount o $225,707.86 recommended if after 0 days required conditions have been fulfilled. Concur. Notice Letter from Ferguson and Burdell , Seattle, gave notice of of Condominium condominium conversion of the Misiy Cove Apartments, 5021 Conversion Ripley Lane North, Renton. Refer to Building Division of the Public Works Department and fir information. (First Cond'ominium. Conversion Notice fil -d under Ordinance #336. .) Water Project Call for bids Water Project #562, bid opening 2/15/80, 15 bids Linear Park received. See attached tabulatio . Water main construction Burnett Ave. S. from S. 7th to S 4th (Linear Park) . R-fer .to Utilities Committee and Public Wo ks De.artment. Travel Mayor Shinpoch requested travel a thorization for Michael Parness Mayor's Administrative Assistant, to the 1980 National League of Cities Conference in Washingto , D.C. 3/16-18/80. Concur. Appointment Mayor Shinpoch appointed Marcia H.11and to the Board of Ethics representing the Renton School Di -trict Board of Directors, replacing Robert Hoffman who has esigned from the District 's Board. Mrs. Holland will complet: Dr. Hoffman's term which expires 12/31/80. Refer to Wa s .nd Means Committee. Appointment Mayor Shinpoch appointted Connie ajon to the Municipal 'rts Commission for a three-year term affective through 12/31 82. Refer to Ways and. Means Committee - Appointment Mayor Shinpoch appointted Brooke 'ryburg to the position of Police Clerk effective 3/1/80 sub ect to customarysix-m.nth probationary period, having been •ertified by Civil Service. Concur. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works/Engineering DATE : 2/13/80 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk SUBJECT : Shannon O'Neil , Rezone R-456-79 At the council meeting of 2/11/80 the above rezone was approved. Please prepare the legal to be attached to the ordinance. Thnak you. st Kenton City Council 201 f 80 Page :3 CONSENT AGENDA- Continued Proposed Report from King County Boundary Review Board gave notice of Annexation proposed annexation by King County Water District #58 (1) #P-70/a Johns Realty Corp. Resolution No. 1838 and; (2) AP-79-1 Resolu- tion No. 1840, Springhaven. Refer to Public Works and Planning Departments for recommendation. Municipal Arts Letter from Mayor Shinpoch announced appointment of Ric Trujillo Commission to the Municipal Arts Commission replacing Margaret Anderson Appointment whose term expired 12/31/79; Mrs. Anderson not able to accept reappointment. Mr. Trujillo is owner of Flowers and Interiors and appointment is for three year term effective through 12/31/82. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Cascadia King County Fire District No. 25 has filed Notice of Appeal No. Annexation 80-2-01684-9 with Superior Court vs. King County Boundary Review Appeal and City regarding Cascadia Annexation (King County Boundary Review Board File No. 870) . Refer to City Attorney. Rezone 456-79 Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval with Shannon O'Neil conditions application filed by Shannon O'Neil for rezone G to B-1 for the purpose of developing a retail shopping facility and office complex; property located northeast corner of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Rezone 454-79 Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval with Charles A. Gramps conditions for application by Charles A. Gramps for rezone of property located on the north side of. Sunset Blvd. NE east of Newport Ave. NE; GS-1 to R-2 for future multiple family develop- ment. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Consent Agenda MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Approval CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Administrative Mayor Shinpoch advised Department Heads that it will not be Report necessary to attend Council meetings unless there is a pertinent agenda item or they are specifically requested to do so. Mayor Shinpoch thanked Public Works Engineer Richard Houghton for commendable effort last Monday night re sewers public hearing. Mayor Shinpoch also noted clarification as requested by Council- man Shane regarding "ethics and the elected official ." City Ordinance No. 2586 was explained along with procedure for declar- ing conflict of interest and disqualification; also Board of Ethics explained. Mayor Shinpoch reported the Suburban Mayors ' Association hosted Kent Swisher and Stan Finkelstein from Associ- ation of Washington Cities 2/6/80 with Legislative update; Council- man Hughes had also attended. OK Cab Inc. Letter from Doretha Rood, President, OK Cab Inc. and Philip Sale Reinhardt requested approval of the sale of controlling interest in OK Cab Inc. , P. 0. Box 217, Renton, to Philip Reinhardt in accordance with requirements of Ordinance 2074. The letter_ explained that Mr. Reinhardt is leasee-operator of the Rainier Union 76 Station at 320 Rainier Ave and that the two businesses will operate compatibly. The letter requested immediate action as closing date had been set at 2/15/80. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Hughes called attention to invitation to meet with State Legislators in Olympia 2/15/80, asking those Councilmen wishing to participate to contact the Council Secretary. Councilman Reed found the orientation with the Planning Department helpful and suggested Public Works and Park Departments also hold orientation for new Council Members if possible. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, MOVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT 8:55 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:30 p.m. All Councilmen present. 9:35 p.m. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. ,41,„„1 • Delores A. Mdad, C 1,C, Renton City Council 2/11/80 Page 3 . CONSENT AGENDA - Continued Proposed Report from King County Boundary Review Board gave notice of Annexation proposed annexation by King County Water District #58 (1) #P-70/a Johns Realty Corp. Resolution No. 1838 and; (2) AP-79-1 Resolu- tion No. 1840, Springhaven. Refer to Public Works and Planning Departments for recommendation. Municipal Arts Letter from Mayor Shinpoch announced appointment of Ric Trujillo Commission to the' Municipal Arts Commission replacing Margaret Anderson Appointment whose term expired 12/31/79; Mrs. Anderson not able to accept reappointment. Mr. Trujillo is owner of Flowers and Interiors and appointment is for three year term effective through 12/31/82. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Cascadia King County Fire District No. 25 has filed Notice of Appeal No. Annexation 80-2-01684-9 with Superior Court vs. King County Boundary Review If Appeal and City regarding Cascadia Annexation (King County Boundary Review Board File No. 870) . Refer to City Attorney. f Rezone 456-79 Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval with Shannon O'Neil conditions application filed by Shannon O'Neil for rezone G to B-1 for the purpose of developing a retail shopping facility and office complex; property located northeast corner of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Rezone `454-79 Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval with Charles A. Gramps conditions for application by Charles A. Gramps for rezone of property located on the north side of Sunset Blvd. NE east of Newport Ave. NE; GS-l. to R-2 for future multiple family develop- ment. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS OF R�� . ó o ' THE CITY OF RENTON • o 4$0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 08055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 4 Q`�' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593� •,9TED SE. •04, February 7, 1980 ' , Mr. George Xenos • Property Development 3000 'N.E. ,10oth . Seattle, WA 98125 RE: File. No. R-456-79; Shannon O'Neil Request for Rezone. Dear Mr.. Xenos: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which .was approved subject to 'conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of .January 23; 1.980, has not been appealed within the time "period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is .being 'submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. . You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, ' --#cc:: L .\.(..1)0"):'4" -- • . • . Fred J. Ka fman • Hearing Examiner • • cc: Planning Department City Clerk 14- Form 81 �,`` ��( .V�� I P,yM�1 i,•-a tJ'\ Affidavit of Publication "' MAY Ig o f ` `, :ti ``ti.=y C'1 r Y of pry, t7,n� `•aJ� STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. ``%vimEFI cl,-, . 71 COUNTY OF KING, -' f 1 q c ,/ C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State;that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad • , was published in said newspaper, and not in a $oarw Zon/E supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the regular -... re issue of said paper on the following day or days March 12 , 1 98 n Or d i n a n r-e N n- ' 4 n 1 ' S'ou77/ zaue ; and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. : CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON --�----- -... --------------`-- -------'----. -. - . ' ORDINANCE NO.3403 , �7 ( . ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, , ( f „t f, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING •f,e 1'�' F-', ; _ CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES �,' I•,' /,t' IIcY'•' //I' ,� WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GEN- . li{ .0 .r 1✓ _'..i , ERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO .. BUSINESS DISTRICT(B-1)O'NEIL R-456-79. WHEREAS under Chopter 7, Title IV(Build- ing Regulations)of Ordinance Na.1628 known as': Subscribed and sworn to before me this Twenty-Second day the "Cede of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,"us amended,and the mops and reports: odoptea in conjunction'therewith, the property of May 8 0 - hereinbelow described hos heretofore been zoned • , 1 as General Classification District(G);and B WHE PEAS a proper petition for change of . � zone clussification of said property hos been filed - `�/�/ `" • with the Planning Deportment on or about-De--- • Notay Public Ind fo':^ f Stare of Washington cember 13;1979,which petition was duly referred trsslQlrtO Sa Star � to the Hearing Examiner for Investigation,study . le and public hearing,and a public hearing having • been held thereon on or about January 15, 1980,- -- ' -- ' - - - - - •and sold matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said toning request -• , 'being in conformity with the City'S Comprehen- sive Plan,as amended,and the City Council hov, inp duly considered all matters relevant thereto,'- • .___..,, ond ail parties having been heard appearing in ' support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW ' -=- ... --,-'-`=-'""'- - .-....._.--.__ _ _-.,, ,^„_ • THEREFORE - k".- - - - - - -- _ a THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF, 1'' - - - -- -- - - _ - . -- --- - - _--- - - - - RENTON,WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOL- 1•' - - - _ - - , LOWS: - - [' - _ - _ SECTION I: The following described proper-• - - - - , - - • - , - - ty in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to - - -, ' Business District (B-1)os hereinbelow specified; _ - - -- subject to the findings, conclusions and decision - - - - - --_ - - - dated January 23, 1980;the Planning Director is - hereby authorized and directed to change the - _ - _ 1 maps of the'Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to - _ - - _ - .. .-.. - - - evidence said rezoning,to-wit: _ _ .- _ - - _ -__ - _ _ - - 'Tract 4 and 4A of Joseph P.Marshall Tracts: _ -- --- -- ._ --._._... - ._.. According to the Plot recorded in Volume 38 of � ti. ' r' - - `^�° - ''"v�'^• Plats, Page 30.Records of King County,Washing• - 'j _ ton except portion for State Highway and except • z - ' - - - portion described os follows: .: .- - • -' - -_ Beginning of the intersection of the easterly mar-.• _ - - • • - •-, _ - gin 138th Ave-S.E.with a line 155 feet northwest- . ,-'_-- ,_ -,- - .•. �__.�..x ' .,� - erly as measured at right angles to centerline of ....--..-•.:-,,,_-7_, .- - --_ -- -- s� - • Pacific State Highway No,2(SR 900), thence N,•:. • .._._._ . .. ._.-. _ _ ___ - _ - -_- _- _ - - ' . _ ._ ... : i ' ' 76.26-00 E 110 feet;thence S.13°34"00" E 110 feet' - ' '-' - - _ µ - - to the northerly margin sold highway;thence S:-. - - _ ---- - --- - . - 76`25'00"W 5.79 feet;thence-S.84'5T51"W 101.12 r - - - - --- --- • - -- - ,. • - _-r___- --- feet; thence N.25-38-11 W 67.15 feet; thence N. - , 04'58'22"E 30.94 feet to the point of beginning. (Said-Property being located at Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E.and Duvall Avenue ' N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effec- , five upon its passage,approval and five days aft-- er its publication. - .- - PASSES BY THE CITY COUNCIL,.this 3rd .- day of March,1980. ' • ' ' - • _ • (S)Delores A.Meod,City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of March,1980. ' Is)Barbaro Y.Shinpoch,Mayor' Approved as to form: ' (s)Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney ---?-- --- ' Dale of Publication:March 12,1980 • • • of' RA,� • � , P o THE CITY OF RENTON ® MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 omiL mmr ° BARBARA`. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09g7'61) SEP1P January 30, 1980 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-456-79;. :Shannon O'Neil Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone request, dated January 23, 1980. The appeal period for the application expires on February 6, 1980, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on February 7, 1980, and will be placed on the Council agenda on February 11, 1980. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, • Fred J. aufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department /r/i�,:`" City Clerk Attachment mti T: 06 f*•• o OF R �y z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 omaw ° BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2553 17.e SER�EMO'.' January •30,•..1980 Members, Renton. City. Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R=456-79; Shannon O'Neil Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone request, dated January 23, 1980. The appeal period for the application expires on February 6, 1980, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by ..Pie Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on February 7, 1980, and will be placed on the Council agenda on February 11, 1980. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Fred J. aufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment fly AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING }, State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn. J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon , oath disposes and states; That on the 23ra day of January , 19 so , of f iant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this h%Sday of 19. So. ' . Hn • \UjW Notary. Public in and for the State , of Washington, residing at Fenton Application, Petition or Case: Shannon O'.Neil; R-456-79, (The minuted contain a List 126 the pansies at5 necond) F _ S January 23,• 1980 • OFFICE OF THE LAND USE. BEARING EXAMINER • CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: Shannon O'Neil FILE NO. R-456-79 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone on the subject site from "G" to B-1 for the purpose of developing a retail shopping facility and office complex. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. ' RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner.: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: . .Examiner on January 14, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field • checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 15, 1980 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the ' Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to' testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. , Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2: Vicinity Map Referencing Section D.6 of Exhibit #1 regarding land use .on the site, Mr. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, noted that a real .estate office previously located on the site has been removed. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: George Xenos • Property' Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 The Examiner inquired if the single. family residence located on the northern portion of the. site is proposed to be removed. Mr. Xenos advised that the building will remain during the' Phase I development plan, but will be eliminated during final development of the site. He submitted an additional exhibit to illustrate proposed site development. The plan was entered as follows by the Examiner: • • Exhibit #3: Site Plan Mr. Xenos noted that existing vegetation had been' retained on the site, and a 10-foot landscape buffer is proposed on the southeast corner to screen the development from property to the east. He advised the applicant's intent to comply with city requirements, and indicated the proposed initial development will include a real estate office and a dental facility. He noted that the proposal meets all standards and .requirements for a shopping center, and site plans will be presented to the Hearing Examiner for review prior to issuance of a commercial building permit. The, Examiner requested testimony in support of the application.' There was no response. He then requested testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: Mrs. Marion Viaene • 4808 Sunset Boulevard N.E. Renton, WA 98055 R-456-79 Page Two • Mrs. Viaeneas affirm ed med by the Examiner. She indicated concern regarding retention of trees which may cause safety hazards on her adjoining property in the future, and inquired if replanting of vegetation or fencing would be proposed on the site. Mr. Xenos referred to Exhibit #3, and advised the applicant's intent to provide a 10-foot easement on the eastern portion of the property; however, fencing is not proposed. He noted that future public hearings would provide the opportunity for site plan review. Responding to Mrs. Viaene's inquiry regarding disposition of exi.sting' residences on the site, Mr. Xenos reiterated previous comments regarding removal upon full development of the site, The Examiner requested clarification of whether the applicant .intends to provide landscaping within an easement or within a buffer of which the applicant would retain ownership. Mr. Xenos indicated the applicant's intent to conform to all requirements determined necessary • ,by the city. ' • The Examiner requested final comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock indicated the departmental recommendation to reverse building layout denoted on Exhibit #3 in order to allow provision of .landscaping in the location now designated for utility • easements, but further review of the matter could occur when the site plan is submitted. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding • File No. R-456-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes arid enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of +2,2 acres of property from G (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet) to B-1 (Business) ., The site is in the approximate northeast corner of the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard N.E. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of, 1971, R.C.W. 43.21,C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. • 7. The subject property was annexed into. the city in July of 1975 at which time the current G zoning was applied. Prior to annexation the subject property was zoned for business uses as part of unincorporated King County. 8. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for commercial development. • 9. The subject property slopes slightly downward from the northwest to the southeast. It has been graded and cleared although some trees remain in the northern perimeter of the subject site, The shape is generally rectangular with the extreme southwest corner of the rectangle excluded from the subject proposal. This excluded area is currently developed with a 7-11 store. 10. Uses surrounding the 'subject site include single family uses both to 'the north and east; the previously mentioned 7-11 store to the southwest; and the Ernst-Malmo shopping center kitty-corner from the subject site. There are also a number of undeveloped parcels in the general area. The real estate office which occupied the subject .site has been removed. There are two existing single family 'homes on the • subject site which eventually will be removed. • '11. The zoning in' the area of the intersection of Duvall and Sunset consists, 'of- B-1 on the northwest, and southwest corners of the intersection. The G district in ahich • the subject property is located extends both north, .east and, south of the' intersection. . and also ,includes an area west of the intersection.:; South of the Ernst-M'almo,.Site there is: an_R-2 (Duplex Residential; minimum lot size 7200 square feet) district, .west of that' is "Pt..-3 (Medium Density Multifamily)`, district-:; Across Duvall,, north the intersection, there is a G-7200 (General; Single..Fami:ly..R'esidential, minimum ;lot:• size .'7200 square feet) district: • • • R-456-79 Page Three • 12. The applicant indicated that they would be willing to create a 10-foot landscape . easement to buffer the single family areas to the north and east of the subject site. 13. The Planning Department recommended that the Hearing Examiner review site development plans for any commercial development on the subject property. • • CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a reclassification must demonstrate compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone.or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; Or C. There, has been demonstrated change in the development pattern in the area since the last rezoning action. • • The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria to permit the rezone of the subject property has been met.' 2. The Comprehensive Plan for the City, of Renton designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for commercial development. The property had previously been zoned for business Uses prior to annexation. The applicant had used the property for a real estate business which has since been removed. The applicant proposes re-establishing commercial uses on the property which is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Restoring the'property to a business classification will not adversely affect the area nor the adjacent single family homes. The applicant has suggested creating a 10-foot landscape buffer with the restoration of natural-type vegetation. 'This .' would satisfy the Planning Department's concern about establishing a buffer between the proposed commercial uses and the adjacent single family property. 4. The single family homes .in the G-7200 zone directly across Duvall Avenue N.E. should also be effectively screened from the more intense commercial development, and a landscape buffer planted with trees and shrubs should be provided along the northern ' 325 feet of the western property line. 5. —The use of this parcel (including the corner site of the 7-11 store) for commercial purposes is compatible with the surrounding zoning which is B-1 on two of the three corners. Reclassification to B-1 also is suitable because the parcel is well located' on a major roadway. The development of commercial properties in this area will create 'a small regional node of commercial activity and will function to serve the multifamily districts located just south, as well as the single family homes in the immediate area. 6. In order to assure compatibility of the proposed commercial development with the • surrounding single family properties, the site plans for the proposed construction should be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner after recommendation by the Planning Department. • RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed "reclassification of the subject property from G to B-1 subject to the dedication of a 10-foot wide landscape easement along the east, north, and northern 325 feet of the west property lines of the subject property, and the. planting of suitable' natural-type vegetation. Approval of. the rezone should be subject to a review of the specific development plans by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Section 4-3010.A.6. • ORDERED THIS 2.3rd day of January, 1980. • • \-X-a Fred J. Ka man • Land Use Hearing txaminer 6 . R-456-79 Page Yoh TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the ,parties of record: George Xenos, Property Development, 3000 N.E. 100th, ' Seattle, WA 98125 ' Mrs. Marion Viaene, 4808 Sunset Boulevard N.E„ Renton, WA 98055 .Shannon O'Neil, 5911-119th S.E„ Bellevue; WA TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke • Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director . Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning' Director ' Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron .Nelson, Building Division . . Lawrence J. Warren; City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsidera ion must be filed in writing on or before February 6, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeliig that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law.or fac , error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which Could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may, make a written request. for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set fo th the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after rev ew of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which req ires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 a d meeting other specified requirements. Copies Of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at ost in said department. • • • • ai • . . ` � ~ ^� � � / / ' | � ` � ^ . n^eiI it 1. ` . 8bauuou O' Neil ± � —TOTAL AREA / Duvall Avenue N .Ig PRINCIPAL ACCESS----- __________ .� 'E . ________ EXISTING ZONING "G" L_��o G� eral Classification District ���___ ' pXlSTlHG USE' __ Single family residence and real estate office 'PROPOSED U5E ~ "°. Retail shopping facility and office �o�pcomplex �p�0mZCi�l ' ` COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. ' / COMMENTS__ . ` t• ,. y , v. im,.' S ,i µ.,J'" it `,£ LI ";' ;,F ', 1 ',. , 44 +F"".4 ir• ' tr 5''Ni a fa m%t ���' 2 z . ,� t� ?yJ n `d ,tom y. .. a a +yt ,�r '" r a� + t do,.J ii,.} r 'M'v fi c, fit`+, V u4-1 • >� kt ' 1 ' . ' ;x i' 'at ..,19 ie; r ,O '�a-. 1..'" _pus GENE-AL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: I SUNSET BLVD, N .E . BETWEEN NEWPORT AVE. N .E. AND UNION AVE . N .E.' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I ', 8 S POSTED T y NOTIFY PR PERTY OWNERS OF i I TO BE 11E01 IN CITY COUNCIL C AM': ERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDINO ON JANUARY 15, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM 1 , , II :':ONCERNING 1 : Ei`, : z Virr ,/1,,, Emy iff7 4 ic • GS-1 TO R-2 I I SF I � , u I y l+x. i; I . ii,„ IT E * i.+ 'III Y. k�• \li r, "' x - F ' 111. .q �, r' d +` lr * may k ' i• , r x ., ° !Mr•,, Rv- , IT , .A ,k1 I 11 'f ,;y..aG, . A.AA. TS 7i R '✓�' r- 'V + v :r I: .. 1 ' Sit(4, 4 'Ki.`n-0!y. .F 1 III FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE Ili ." V -I- WITHOUT }w -®PER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 15 , 19 80 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING fiITIONS : 1. MICHAEL E. BAKER, APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PLACEMENT OF SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM, File E-460-79; property located at 2109 Talbot Road South . 2. SHANNON O'NEIL, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1, File R-456-79 ; property located on the northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E . and Duvall Avenue N.E. 3. CHARLES A. GRAMPS , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-2 , File R-454-79 ; property located on Sunset Blvd. N.E . between Newport Ave. N.E . and Union Ave. N.E. 4. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-4 TO B-P , File R-455-79; property located on Logan St . No. between North 6th St . and North 4th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL IN-1ERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 15, 1980 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 4 , 1980 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVL DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 2nd day of January , 1980 `_-_ S I G N E D RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JAN 151980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM 7f81911011111211121384,516 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 15, 1980 EXHIBIT NO. l APPLICANT : SHANNON O'NEIL ITEM NO. �/ ��� _ 7FILE NUMBER: R-456-79 �J A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone on the subject site from "G" to B-1 for the purpose of developing a retail shopping facility and office complex. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: SHANNON O'NEIL 2. Applicant : SHANNON O' NEIL 3. Location : NE corner of Sunset Blvd N.E. (Vicinity Map Attached) and Duvall Avenue N.E. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5 . Size of Property : +2 .2 acres 6 . Access : Via Duvall Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: "G" , General Classification District ; minimum lot size 35 , 000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area: "G" , B-1 , Business Use 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on January 4, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 3 , 1980 . C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the. City by Ordinance #2945 of July 7, 1975 at which time the present zoning classification was applied. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The subject site slopes slightly downward from northwest-southeast . 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SHANNON O'NEIL, File No : R-456-79 JANUARY 15, 1980 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : Most of the site has been graded and clear:d. There are some existing evergreen trees on the northern portion . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site may prov de some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (January 3, 1980) 6. Land Use : A single family residence is located on the northern portion of the site . A real estate office is located o the site just north of the 7-11 Store. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties consist of a mixture of commerci. l, low density single family residential and undeveloped uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: An 12" water main is located or Duval Avenue N.E. adjacent to the westerly boundary of the subject s . te , while another 12" main extends east of the intersection of Duvall • and Sunset Blvd. N.E. on the north site of Sunset . . An 8' sanitary sewer is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd N.E. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Departmenv per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N.E. within 2 mile to the west of the subject site . 4. Schools : The Honeydew and Sierra Heights Elementary Sc ools are within one mile of the subject site while McKnight iddle Schc is two miles away and Hazen High School is within 4 of . mile. 5. Recreation : The subject site is within one mile of Kiw.nis Park and within one .mile of the proposed King County Pa k west of Sierra Heights Elementary School. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE .ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729, "G" , General Classification District . 2. Section 4-711, B-1 , Business Use . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFISIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan, 1965, Land Use Report , Objectives , pages 17-18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezoning of the subject site will not directly impact the property. However, subsequent development will disturl the soils , remove the vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures , however, many of these impacts can be mitigated. V PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SHANNON O'NEIL, File No : R-456-79 JANUARY 15, 1979 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment : The impact on population and employment can not be evaluated until actual development plans are submitted. 3. Schools : Normally schools would not be impacted: However, placement of a fast food restaurant on the subject site would create a substantial modification of pedestrian movement and high school students habits in the area. 4. Social : Unknown. Impacts dependent upon ultimate commercial development of the subject site . 5 . Traffic : Unknown . Traffic volumes and patterns are dependent upon the ultimate use of the site. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : 1. The rezone request from "G" , General Classification District is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Element , which designates the subject site as commercial . 2. The other three corners of the intersection have been developed commercially. Both the northwest and southwest corners have been rezoned since the subject site was annexed in 1975. The Central Highlands Plaza has been constructed on the south- west corner after Ordinance #3152 rezoned the property in 1977. The northwest corner was rezoned in 1978 by Ordinance #3225 to allow the expansion of a non-conforming commercial use . 3. The 7-11 Store, immediately adjacent to the south of the subject site, and the Mobile Gas Station on the southeast. corner of the intersection were constructed prior to their annexation in 1975 . 4. The items addressed in #1 , 2 and 3 appear to indicate that the subject site is potentially zoned for the B-1 classification requested. (Section 4-3014(A) (3) . 5 . The subject site has not been specifically considered in an area wide land use or zoning analysis since the site was annexed in 1975. This appears to comply with the requirement of Section 4-3014(A) (1) . 6. The subject site is adjacent to existing single family residences. The Comprehensive Plan has designated these adjacent areas as Low Density Multiple Family to provide a buffer. However, the existing single families residences should be protected from any commercial development . To insure this, site plan approval should be required for any commercial development with emphasis placed on screening the residential uses . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SHANNON O'NEIL, File No: R-456-79 JANUARY 15, 1980 PAGE FOUR M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the above analysis, it is recommended that the' Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the rezone request from "G" General Classification District to B-1 , Busines- Use Dirstrict , File Number R-456-79, subject to the foll.wing conditions: 1 . Site Plan approval by the Hearings Examiner of all commercial development proposed on the subject site. 2. Adequate screening of the adjacent residential uses. �u.>.;.',atS7 ?I F I NAL CLARAT I ON OF Fu `° j DN--S I GN I F I LANCE Application No . R-456-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental C:iecklist No . ECF-531-79 MI FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests a rezone on the subject site from "G" to B-1 for the purpose of developing a retail shopping facility and office complex. Proponent SHANNON O'NEIL Location of Proposal NE corner of Sunset Blvd NE and Duvall Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to 0 have 1 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is W is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance : (1) The rezone request complies with the Comprehensive Plan (2) There are existing major commercial developments on all four corners of the intersection . ( 3) This declaration applies to the rezone only. Any subsequent develop- ment will follow the normal SEPA Guidelines . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible O'ficial GORDON-Y. ERICKSEN • Title PLAN G D ECTOHIDate JANUARY 11 , 1980 Signature, ,`r City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • . i.1)-kst.„.-197:„.,.4(34 • - @)¢o came® j ( - — 1 1 J 8 "E 101 l 3' _ • 8 "Jiiw , _i SR. 1 il ! v-i. r ...,..,.., ,, , • „7„) t: .. i . . . ,„.„,, , _ eY CL,s .. , , ....,„, a6 :„aN i ,,,,,,,,/,.-,, ..1 , 8 , _ -:::(tsg'4.;--'11.,'?""ai1 ..5¢tom. Si, , h� /ti � y .n ots� ... t1 ��':rs �. ' Etla.ta+y�b 'p\r m, 1 �'. s • ai L J i. -. t, L .al_,_ .w,'� 1� ® I Bui 'ea'm-ti.� .--.-a ___EL_ o •�L•_v A=-_ a E,,\i:- -2 0 ./ e ��' ,r 3as'c•,'eT- ,; 110000-00 i R® m ' R �> • -_.. P r� rza �eaa . .''' , ,. .. l.''''''''‘-'N''' ni ":11.-.-car•-•var.-azen-•-e /:.N'''''L -.•.P'41• 0 0 --:;5;;;:'14 . t• '. - L i , 0 . r 1 _-', _— 0 _., '.._ _ .....rs=©, 6 +� .�. - �'^:7.err�.m.•'a_�.a cc �.. ' d . .p�';1�'1 Q I 'ate i�L f Via� �'�_i � I - �TT1JtzS ,1 ,, µ �=1�I 1''',,,���'!!!///\\\..,\\\pI •u Iy n.� • '�r '01 _ a r� '"j''Ix.li+14p+. Z.E n,i i V � �-1.••b 1- ..0-1.y.'10 a.e,•Y J 11 .Y ���j' .1 ram'• '1 '''' 1 —: i+ �' 'R-.1 1 ;i + \t,. .1 .: _ A I i f�/ al,_—i i0 > a '_1� y,{ ,d1 „•�` '1;�r*Ih ,f! ". 1�i i ..fee"11311 ?� , 6'S Ll_�.11 •' I .a J�n� Ir 'e�T• 1 1•2� p 4 . -���Y' c 'r<I,�i ,g frF t—. ; o ,I .I kid. I \ '� r' ®S'-. n jai o 5 o a r1 .. a l _ F ' �.,.y 4-y`r` «t.,..'..... .««...�a,.w't _, ;,o eo r • g,Qn.yT - t f' I I I.. . -1 ' 1 • '•i\ 1 ,4 , , tt IJ. h 11 -". = 1, 1.,.i. ..-7.i' i4'1 p.®•em•�.m•Eb i I} \e-� 1 o , Zy �ti { I ! ' 1`S ya i 11` •1 I 1 a�q .i. _ `'- - I I t�� .a:.. -----•",..ai^^m4.7'r'rrs rn^s.t-,or e.:....:x •.1•....uA 1 • SHANNON O'NEIL R-456-79 I { ,,+.."---r'--, ,,-,-S .---"" .....,.v..u.tL.eY.w.u,i;:^@R:rm:^.rr•3".^^,Y=0.10. 0^.J:.::ur.12r:=0=r_r.,,,,Z..4=0 ^.mmiss&s^b:.•••a..-3--•,^,,.:s:s¢0,020,mR•aaxs - 'rJ".^.Cit;1L^ "TL^'3 1 APPLICANT Shannon O' Neil TOTAL AREA ± 2 , 2 acres I PRINCIPAL ACCESS Duvall Avenue N.E . 1 F EXISTING ZONING "G" , General Classification District i S i Single family residence and real estate office EXISTING USE 1 PROPOSED USE Retail shopping facility and office complex 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial j i • COMMENTS • 1 ii 1 a 11 I OF RA,A - `c, o THE CITY •tF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. BENTON,WASH.89055 CHARLES J.DELAURENT0 D MAYOR __ o -_PLANNING DEPARTMENT - - 09,� tr - 235- 2550 - c394 7- e0 SEPP" January 2, 1980 Mr. Shannon O'Neil 5911 119th S .E. Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1, File R-456-79; property located on the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. Dear O'Neil : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 21? 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 15, 1980 at 9 :Q0 a.m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By: ,p � . Ro e J. Blaylock Associate Planner cc: George Xenos 3000 N.E. 100th St. Seattle, WA 98125 r Y CITY OF RENTON RE7O!IE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BPPLICATION NO. -q66-!�y 9 LAND USE HEARING /7 EXAMINER 'S ACTION 2PPLICATION FEE $ ' APPEAL FILED ?ECEIPT NO . CITY COUNCIL ACTION 'ILING DATE l4//3/7 ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE ?EARING DATE %PPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : L . Name Mr. Shannon O 'Neil Phone 746-5656 Address 5911 119th SE Bellevue , Washington 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 138th Avenue SE between Sunset Blvd, and 1 . Square footage or acreage of property Approx. 2.2 Acre 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) See Attached 7Of \ REC�IVEo. • DEC 13 1919 G -ING DEP Pe' 3 . Existing Zoning '°G" Zoning Requested B-1 1OTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements. ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7 . Proposed use of site For the development of a retail shopping facility and office complexes. 3. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. The development will incorporate proper screening , buffering, and a green-belt along the easterly and northerly portions of the'. property. ) . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Building permits for phase I of the development will. be requested upon final design and reclassification•. ) . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 Legal Description Tract 4, and 4A of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , Page 30, King -County Washington; Except the Following : The Southwest corner . thereof, as described by a • line starting at the State Highway right of way on 138th Avenue SE and extending 120 feet parallel to the center line• of S' R 900 to the intersection of a line perpend • - icular to it extended 110 feet to the right of way of S R 900, of tract 441„ Except portion for State Highway. AFFIDAVIT • 1 , Shannon 0Neil , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 19th day of November , 19 79 , • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Bellevue S 4P0 •• MUTUAL, INC. t� ��` �•Q,e� Name of Notary Pu lic) (Signat - e n- • • b Pi_ SE ey2Auutz up 19 5919 119th Ave. S.E. (Address) l (Address) Bellevue, WA. (City) (State) 746-5656 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be tla• nd complete in every particular and to conform to the rules an,c1".Kyrilui4-4,19 of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing o; ,.sun rapioli45 ion . mp Date Received 19 By : • ' G D�g Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ( ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM � R€ . RECEI\JED ®) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEC 13 1979A. Application No. x-5/$-6-7? 9 h��1 ' Environmental Checklist No. 2-7 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: ® Declaration of Significance [' Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for, all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required. or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Mr. Shannon O ' Neil 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 5911 119th Ave SE iie L levue , Washington Phone 746-5656 3. Date Checklist submitted City of Renton 4. Agency requiring Checklist December 13 , 1979 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • N/A 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size. general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The reclassification will allow for the development of the site into a combination of office complexes and shopping .ili_tieso The development will be accessing onto 138th Ave SE and Sunset Blved, 7. " Location of proposal (describe the' physical setting of the proposal , as well + as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts„including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of theenviron- mental setting of the proposal ) : The site is a rectangular parcel of land situated at , the North- • . east corner of ' 138th Ave SE & Sunset Blvd. It contains approx. ' - ' •' 2 acres. ' The' site is flat and. was `S,triDTaed,,,af most of it's natural vegatation when it was graded while it was still in tuy® • 8. Esthhimaetcedo 'dntate for completion of "the proposal : ! ' .,. . . . Phase I Summer•'of 1980 9.' List of "al l •permi is, licenses-or government approvals required for thee„ proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : Zone Reclassification City of Renton Building Permits City of Renton ! „ } Developers Extentions . ' City of Renton i1 i• '•.,,• 10. • Do you have .any,plans for.future additions , expansion, or further activity ,,,_:J, .` "re,lat,e'd,.to or connected with this proposal? , If yes , explain: I, None - i' ' - l01 ,11. . .Do.you •know .of any ,plans . byothers �whi.ch may affect the, property cov,elred :by: . ,.your°. proposal? If, yes, ,explain , ,;y ;112,,,i -,,Attach ,any other.,application form ,that :has been completed regarding Ithe pro- 1 ,posal ; if ,none has :beep .completed,,',but -is expected to be filed at some future C 1 ;date, ,describe the ;,nature 'of such;appl icat;ion form ' /!) , n I• r , I, • ' ' ' ' ! • • 1:�.,,i' : , II: ,ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT5 ) • (Explanations of all "yes" and "'maybe" 'ans'wers are' required) ' i 1(1) ' Earth. !Jill the proposal result in: " ' 1 • 1 , I' .. - (a) Uns'table, earth..condi-'ti'ons .or in'.changesein'.geologic ' �,;•.( '', • . substructures? ,t '.. YET jMASYB,L 'W) • ;, • - ,.,,. • .. ..-. (b) . . Disruptions,. displacements , compaction or_.'over-. ' ' ' . covering of the soil? _� �i u•, . c;" _ - ' c .'YES =;r;,MAYBE NO ... (c)' .Change in topography or ground .surface relief' features? . .. . Yr i M BE . .NO .-. ' . .. (d) .",.The destruction,'•coveri.ng'-or"modi'fication 'of any ,; ' i ''" unique geologic or physical features? , " ' " . '. "_'(e) ..:Any, increase, in wind.or water erosion'of'.'soi'is, .. ' ;i i. ,either on or off the site? i l'"X Y -.I MAYBE N0. ' ; .(f)' ' Changes in deposition or'er'osion'"of 'beach• sands, 'or ;;'r . - 1.1,1'' ,. • 'changes in siltation,, depos,ition or erosion which . I ' '''... `i ..'.1-`:S:' .u. (iaay-iinodify' the':channel of..a:.:"river' or.-stream",or'-the ''�_ - ';i,_ _,t_1,. bed,of the ocean' or any bay, inlet or- lake? ._ • '1 �,�.X. ': .l.)''..,,�; .,ti::..:'�J_,:;;;,.;;: �:t::a., : . �: ': C-; YE }.', ' No Explanation Due •.'.to.."the clearing "-and ,grading " of the Property .' •, „ " ' ..Lt J''Ji a __lam .. :L.l...linl.._ ..,:., i.l! .i , _._ .... prior `to'"annexat'ion -the ,site. "will :-only require 'minimal . o-.:...::.... .... -3- (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Y�`E — MAYBE NF (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X, , YT MAYBE tM (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, • or any chingemi;n c_1'imate, either locally or regionally? X YES A9f BBE NO-- Explanation: During construction there will be an increase of emmissions into the air from construction equipment and sup- plies. After constrution, the principle source of pollution will be exhaust emmissions from traffic associated with the 3) dateelo t , ( Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MA BE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YET- M YBE 0- (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE N (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES- MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality. including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE O— M Alteration of' the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MA iT0 (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE KU— Explanation: The introduction of impervious surfaces such as asphalt , concrete and roofing will decrease aosorbtion rates, increase direct surface runoff, . and change local drainage patterns . tormwater will be directed to an approved properly designed (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: collection-retention system® (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops . microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE AU' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X Yr'" MAYBE WU— (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YET- MAYBE (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Y Explanation: very attempt will be made to retain whits left of the natural vegetation and trees through the design process, -4- - . (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including • reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? }� YET— MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? 'ES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? DES— MAYBE NO Explanation: Upon visual inspection of the site , no fauna was observed. (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE No Explanation: There will be an incre.:tse in noise levels in t' e vicinity of the project during construction. After const : uctian noise associated with the routine operations will result only from vehicular treffic to and from the development° (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? E MAYBE ` I Explanation: As a matter of security the development will rf — quir. e lighting during periods of darkness. (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? S MAYBE NI Explanation: The development will result in a permanent improvement, (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Tn.- WEE' NI (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE Ni The development will create :�a short term incrase Explanation; • in the use of resources such as construction supplies . T ere Mill be a permanent increase use of natural resources asso— ciated with operation of tha development and tr. anspor tsti n to (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an and from. explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? SSE MAYBE Nt Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YTS- MAYBE• Explanation: -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES WEE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? }{ YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? • YES Wit iB (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES Wire ff (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X TB— M B f ()T (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X ! - MAYBE ff (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X� YES-- MAYBE NO Explanation: Traffic from the site will increase with the normal opperation of the development . The new traffic should mostly be directed towards Sunset Blvd, which should have a minor impact on the traffic due to the standards which it was designed to. Parkin:7 facilities win. be constructed consistent with parking codes (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE TO-- (b) Police protection? X YE MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? —y YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO • (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE N — (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Vim— MAYBE 0— Explanation: Construction and heating will use energy. Auto- mobiles generated by this development will use gas and oil. (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? y. YES MAYBEgo — (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE Fir (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE N (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE N (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE N) Explanation: This development will require the extension of both water and sewer systems© We have already contacted the Renton engineering department and have initiated the process, (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive • site open to public view? .X YES MAYBE N) Explanation: The site will be altered from its present wicant character to developed business .facility, (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE N Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? • X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon t s chg 1st should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lac of full di cl1, osure on my part. Proponent: ( si ned Gethrge o Xe s (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ENDING' OF FILE Fig TITLE 45( 7 •