Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA89-072
WINDSOR APARTMENTS DAY CARE FACILITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for PRIMARK 102 - 1200 S. 192nd Street Seattle, Washington 98148 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112TH Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P E TELEPHONE 455-5320-AREA CODE 206 Pres dent August 31 , 1989 Mr. William Van Geelkerken Construction Manager PRIMARK 102 - 1200 S. 192nd Street Seattle, WA 98148 Re: Windsor Apartments Day Care Center Dear Bill: We are pleased to submit this traffic impact analysis for the proposed enrollment increase at the existing Windsor Apartments Day Care facility. We have discussed this project with City of Renton staff (Traffic Engineering and Planning sections) , and feel this analysis will satisfy their requirements for review of your proposal. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Primark is seeking the modification of a conditional use permit to allow the existing 3500 square foot day care facility (presently used by 8 children of Windsor apartments residents only) to open to public enrollment and admit up to 60 children as allowed by state law. The building is located at 4311 N.E. 5th St. , approximately 300 feet west of Bremerton Ave. (See Figure 2) . The site vicinity is shown in Figure 1 . The operator of the center will continue to be Tender Years School, Inc. and the hours of operation will remain 6: 30 AM to 6:30 PM. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 202 apartment units and day care building comprising the existing Windsor Apartment complex are accessed via the two lane local access streets of Bremerton Ave. N.E. and N.E. 5th Street. Bremerton Ave. widens to three lanes at N.E. 4th St. , but generally consists of 23 feet of pavement with curb, gutter, sidewalk and L Mr. William Van Geelkerken PRIMARK August 31 , 1989 Page 2 street lighting on the west side only. N.E. 5th St. has 30 feet of pavement with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting provided on both sides. Bremerton Ave. N.E. and N.E. 5th St. connect to the arterial system at N.E. 4th St. and Union Ave. N.E. , respectively. Northeast 4th St. is a five lane major arterial (including a two- way left turn lane) with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Union Ave. N.E. has recently been rechannelized at N.E. 5th St. to provide two lanes in each direction (the easterly lane is a right turn only lane at the intersection) with a posted speed limit of 30 MPH. The three intersections of 4th/Bremerton, 5th/Union and 5th/Bremerton were counted in the AM and PM peak hours by TP&E staff on Wednesday, August 16, 1989 . The AM peak hour occurred from 7 : 15 to 8: 15 and the PM peak hour occurred from 4:30 to 5: 30 . Results of these manual traffic counts are shown on Figures 3 and 4 . Accident statistics for these three intersections were obtained from the City of Renton for the time period from January 1 , 1986 to June 30, 1989 . The City' s data shows no reported accidents for 5th/Bremerton, 3 rear-end accidents at 4th/Bremerton and two sideswipe accidents at 5th/Union. All three intersections are operating well with low accident rates. Recent speed/volume data collected by the City of Renton (see attached summary sheet) for N.E. 5th St. shows the 85th percentile speed is 25 .9 MPH. The Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ( 1976 edition, page 860) states that "The 85th percentile speed as determined by spot speed studies is the principal factor generally used by traffic engineers to determine speed limits" . The 85th percentile speed for a given section of roadway is that speed below which 85% of the vehicles on that section of roadway are traveling. The reasons for using the 85th percentile speed of the actual vehicles on the roadway are that most drivers are reasonable and prudent, and that a speed regulation should be almost self- enforcing. If the voluntary compliance is less than this percentage, it is apparent that many drivers do not consider the speed limit to be reasonable and heavy enforcement may be needed to obtain compliance. The 85th percentile speed on N.E. 5th St. measured by the City is close to the unposted, statutory speed Mr. William Van Geelkerken PRIMARK August 31 , 1989 Page 3 limit of 25 MPH. City policy precludes posting of a lower speed limit and posting of 25 MPH speed limit signs appears to be unwarranted. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Table 1 shows the vehicular trip generation expected for a typical 3500 square foot day care facility. These numbers are based on data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (4th Edition, 1987) , for ITE land use code 565 . Previous studies of day care center trip generation have used a 75% pass-by factor; i.e. , 3/4 of the trips generated are already on the arterial street system and stop by the day care facility on their way to/from another destination. Therefore, most of the trips shown on Table 1 are "new" trips to N.E. 5th St. and/or Bremerton Ave. , but only 25% of the trips are "new" to N.E. 4th St. and/or Union Avenue. Using the existing traffic volumes as a model for peak hour trip distribution, 65% of the day care center trips are expected to be oriented to/from the intersection of N.E. 5th/Union and 35% are expected to be oriented to/from the N.E. 4th/Bremerton intersection. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT Construction is currently underway to build the 30 unit Heritage Village Apartment complex on N.E. 5th St. (south side) west of the Windsor Apartments. Using 1987 ITE Trip Generation data, this project will add 183 trips per day to the street system (16 AM peak hour and 20 PM peak hour trips) . The Windsor Apartments day care facility trip generation was added to the Heritage Village trip generation to derive the future volumes shown on Figures 5 and 6. Background traffic growth of 3% was assumed for the arterial system to account for completion of other land development projects in the area. Table 2 represents a summary of intersection level of service analyses conducted using the methodology of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research II Mr. William Van Geelkerken PRIMARK August 31 , 1989 Page 4 Board) . The impacted intersections have adequate capacity to absorb the additional traffic anticipated for both this day care facility and the Heritage Village project. CONCLUSIONS The slight increase in traffic resulting from the proposed day care enrollment increase will not appreciably reduce the level of service at any of the nearby intersections. The existing two way left turn lane on N.E. 4th St. will continue to facilitate left turns to/from Bremerton Avenue. Recent rechannelization work at N.E. 5th St. will improve circulation by providing separate through and turning lanes on Union Ave. at the intersection. Several low cost modifications to traffic operations are suggested to enhance safety in the neighborhood: 1 ) Post a W14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Ave. immediately north of N.E. 5th Street. 2) Post a W2-4 "T" intersection advance sign and a W1-7 large double arrow sign for eastbound N.E. 5th St. traffic approaching Bremerton Avenue. 3) Widen the pavement or place gravel fill along the eastern edge of pavement on Bremerton Ave. south of N.E. 5th St. to reduce the pavement edge drop-off hazard. An alternative to providing additional roadway width would be the posting of "No Parking" signage on the west side of Bremerton Ave. (between 4th and 5th St. ) to ensure adequate street width for two way traffic. 4) Maintain the channelization on Bremerton Ave. approaching 4th St. (westerly lane designated for right turns only, the other a through/left lane) . 5) Trim vegetation on the northeast corner of Union Ave. at 5th St. to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north. 6) Post "Day Care Parking Only" signs in front of the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short term parking for parents picking up or dropping off children. Employee parking should be provided elsewhere in the complex. Mr. William Van Geelkerken PRIMARK August 31 , 1989 Page 5 If you have any questions or concerns, please call either Bob Evans or me at 455-5320 . Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this project. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Ofra-,;%4 274/ David H. Enger, P.E. Vice President RE:ba enc. TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION WINSDOR APARTMENTS DAY CARE FACILITY AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Weekday Enter 22 21 117 Exit 20 22 117 Total 42 43 234 A trip is defined as "a single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (entering or exiting) inside the study site" . TABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Existing Existing 1990 1990 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SBL SBR EBL SBL SBR EBL SBL SBR EBL SBL SBR EBL N.E. 4th St. D A A E A A D A A E A A @ Bremerton Ave. (172) (738) (467) (72) (778) (519) (156) (717) (449) (67) (758) (494) WBL WBR SBL WBL WBR SBL WBL WBR SBL WBL WBR SBL N.E. 5th St. A A A C A A A A A C A A @ Union Ave. (590) (988) (982) (291) (962) (759) (554) (980) (972) (259) (940) (727) SBL = southbound left turns SBR = southbound right turns EBL = eastbound left turns WBL = westbound left turns WBR = westbound right turns Level of service is a qualitative term that describes the operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway. It is specified on six different levels ranging from A (optimum flow conditions) to F (stop and go). LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALZED INTERSECTIONS RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO (PCPH) SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC 400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays * F * * When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. (xx) = Reserve Capacity F!._n.- ..::+— c.;'1 I I.': ).: :L•: I. I I 1 IA I.1=1 7 11_4 1 I F I_. Hu I:.a IF_r,'..:�`,---c'::i J. It t 1 r r:y: Volule by Speed Report Page 1 . fileffeffleeefeltlIKllifflPIMEilifilllfll[fifelIfiliel etetfleliltfftti*I*Ie Data File : 110823001.PRN Station : 0 ILyication i 103 Irtervai : 60 sinutes San date : Avg 23, 99 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Aug 23, 89 Stop tine f 24s00 City/Town ; Renton County : King Location i NE 5TH 61 F/ll UNION AV At assisallssin*M1101111,101041MillIMMilllif VIM VIIIIVlFlslIIIIIIIIIIIM111114 Lange 1-2 are West/East Combined Wed - Aug 23, 89 Speed 1-10 11-15 16-28 21.25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 Total 01r'• 1 I 1 I 1 8 0 0 0 0 5 82:'.'. 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 03:00 8 8 8 0 1 0 0 8 8 0 1 84:, 0 0 2 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 3 05:, 0 0 1 1 1 8 0 8 0 0 3 06:00 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 07:80 1 2 7 6 0 0 0 0 8 0 16 ::00 0 2 14 .. 26 5 1 0 0 0 0 48 89:80 7 5 11 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 18:'.', 2 0 18 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 13 lli08 3 5 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 12:00 0 7 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 13r4 1 3 9 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 14:'., 0 7 10 12 1 0 0 8 0 0 30 1. ` 0 4 9 8 5 8 0 0 0 0 26 ffs,,, 2 7 5 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 32 17: •'• 6 10 18 13 13 8 0 0 0 0 68 18:'.. 6 8 13 20 13 1 0 0 0 8 61 19:00 0 7 18 21 12 2 0 8 0 0 68 20:00 0 3 16 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 34 211 2 3 11 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 29 22:00 2 3 7 12 4 0 0 0 8 0 28 23:00 0 3 0 . 4 3 8 0 0 8 0 10 24:'', 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 =Mwsc� Grand Totals 33 82 195 280 75 9 8 0 8 0 . 594 7 Percentages 5,6 13.8 . 32.8 33.7 12.6 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 iltlittelteilititetttiffttt elikileillifiefe04114,191 lfl!fltl}IMeleteleiltel ttieltilltel1e;elgte tketi* elvlf/lfisfeflfee *Mee Station Speed Sminary 7'iZc' is-Gbt/Gy Total Avg Spd 15%ile 50 ile 85Xi1e )55 %)55 )60 7t)60 )65 %)65 4.5:1 c1'(.g ... oc %71 4raiZ 594 19.6 14.4 20.7 25.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 tllftR****0*biflllent**timi$4ef,ileM111/11lfftfl0111111VelIII{lleefe tleele Ve!t6Ma. ,41,...,:-.:,. .....-4-it.?„---,s,..„,"„ 4„ (/ 9 •.�. 7ct)—t,9 �oto,,:J " A--0/PT , di -c- L% . .t-Cf ' 19 p - ,v,L, 41(,y.,"!_. L: 11,e /-y 6 0le e . (%t.i l�[.L'L.L.G.t,t,e 1 L.i�'J 1 1!J ,h Ni: i aeTH s;'' °'"eg�x 3 r A tr, j_><� 34 `g i _ 35 %f q< .awe A. Mt - I = I •!'�!: A MOfANTAOYSv rY` - �, PARR. __tN nn117 I IEGIONAL NTLpWyp ` :.!• Y. I fS V1,. ,, �t,.1.79 , I I - I PARK •SS MTNK � T C•y. 2 . �a'n..n. i•'ia f ;TOOTH':. 2 t. = = I \ f • 77:: N ..TNST' •'-t. F. ,�'IOOiN S} x I] �I 3G• , i -<NE wry 1 'a g[ .� •K 1 W .r0<II� N[2l1,K \,Y SE 10 .L2 1,1.T ..11. :.1.. i:t• S N .'N' -� ��'� 'sf LZ � • \ 2 sf NE 1 _ : "'' .•� Lc. 4 cE'Ism ` 11. . 11 SE:Al 1 • P bask Nf NNN ST t _ �` 'N� ISIII SST .., S T• •A I :.11. \\,.....i.c. w �I> PAR ..P..u. •. C-41i IrM"PST r'h I 1 1 1� o _-�.K TR' o !T M 1pTM n uTN -1 '� S si .. JR Ns !' ral Ni 1 ,sr \. S�i �C0 7! AQUA I kNE I :IT • . I Y ex6v F .... �' PF. € 1 �'P j IilL. 'T 1- I t3[,IIITN R j� �� �q RK .r a, ®NIM©•!' N[pl3L °Aanv"'"- SE IIUH P1, I�� .. ,;'li,m 0.' L I} R sr >t...../...;;; /. 9$ Ns 7 ® qN>= W�� •'; �'1i. K• 3,•, ��'�' I ■ SE IIiM f,�'i SE:nTTN 3fT I • a`� E Maim a "15-E118 SE 11 TN i.r(: — I�' —.� rB=E I x I lA �r ly (L/J -yVi•�. P! •y• :.,.if.l 7 I--M., f " S ■ �iS,U I > - c y NE ST I = !Iv - ': 'Il�we\M IM ST 7M 7m ST I I ST \�?�� . v Item 1121ST ST SE 11orN T i 'o`;C r.2. .N! frN,�1IM1�,[� „CT ..F Sf I I 920t. Q •� �,� ' Nw1 I ._ I . TN I 7.:,R.GI PAINT.• yI �T 'f,...""V r N. T \Y AV N[ _ll. I •r iTO `my, aiii ll Nf--L-- - -i _ — :6RFM'I :•> , sE11NITN sr Si I Sib 4�.. pp I ^ NUTNM. i MI s -1-i`ti ll nn T . t P S"" Si —411:021 SC ISMS ST Y � R i `/�� i , 11 "TorPUVFr PROD Et N.1ST K.;, ` 11 t'♦.R:lT i1 LFYf rfM I < TI`• �X 1 1� RT Q hl I K>� � P 0 F. SITE I ' � aTN ''-' a a TT T SE 'mn= t trout— 16 I I R1 1 SRN l] I s[- y - I .y . f�i ti-1�—:Y M—— x ... ST"ST ... •ram®�CEDAR A`lC/_i L I .'• 1 •t•• s- l se laTNt sT— s . --IL--- --i, V 't,'2 IAI1R;'' [ W - F Mr'N. ` ..IlrTN *.. 'b I z�'+. .r `v N::•.;1< 1sm1 s PL unary <<t F .1%r :� ', s �I b SE IT PL NJ • !A' 1 �` - n ,,,SE. 101N ST s[M u1 FITIST fP .. O LY i:: 'in..�i \ !E 1 I i17,E� •iit !rC '!.i I'• I \ V Ill M S[tn.T K ? n.1M[ICNTl• 112 —. � •dt . .�_ I � • li ''PL 1 p Si, use K >... .::1 C ,ARNOLD.„ tyl....., 1i 1_ (N4114 il;.:;.„,0„RSF.•.., . .:r,..�7.1 r 4 ST e i ..;tu0 M. - 1 <w.' ��•!_y C ID'i ....? 1 '::; '' �a '2J_ - 1 $ •�S ,t's[1Y 1+ .... ILi� ?. IE14W ...,. 2 • } VICINITY MAP FIGURE WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITY fEl E.. 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY I ...,, .. ....,. ;..x; _. DAYCARE • C ..�. •• 4,1( . 1: .3 . .k�.,,,,,e,,,,,,,,,.: fii. ' ., BUILDING .1 :!'-1 •' '' N ,: ' — i-.-: not to scale • f •„I....�'`y� .. err:,r,�. • �. i f•.• ;; S 1 �' e.r I 1. rt, , r ! .n: -El1 �,_: •• III n AR il . • '" 7 -1111- 7 Ati -- , . 6. ,--...._.,r-_, ;Cit . 2 fl‘- • \ r,..T.4 . . , .,,, , , ., ,.), ,..., :. ,. . . ...—.-.1 ‘--1 .,. - IP' -71( 'n "--V14- • i . • ( .: PI' 4 . ..„ \s_ • ...; r ..* �— To ; ., --E. • `•� �11 yip ,,i } ;t. 6. ^t -' Union r��"I — ��-`-° '' "" • �ji > - = �_:: —. ''i'• 5th St. NE 7 Ave. la ras . 'r " • - r•. •• J • � . ... 1� -= �'• •' J -- rip.tiO r ;fNE 'P..1,74.11I4, ' I ,.o , > . l• I► `i.1 . . : i r . • =' I,Z I 1 .1 _I1_•i f� r . ....{_.. � ' � ., r -Frt.. -I. I � 1 - U.: ,- � J�. I wff\ � 5 1 .'� JI� ill l: i =S 3 J • _ _ .II r � .!� 1 � • - _ � ' '" e) . z a�; f.` ) _ a _ , /• Yt F� • l'ri•. �1 Fl k� /.11 -•- 1 Pj. F S 1 f:: a •i .•1 r COL- f;:i 1, ., /s � 5,_•'$tl N • II •-� ,� `—.� �:• w g .- .. - ' • tP'-7—, 1;1" ••'I • :'••''••• •••••-• i ' '••'•-• • • 0-9Y C ',(I ' 0•QCC - 4 ,, I•_---!. ...... i,-.-s-t „ .Ali",, •I1;� -_,- `I .J, . ' `{`,`` ' 4th St. NE ) ( SITE PLAN . FIGURE • WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITY ii[l 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY I • N not to scale N II �10 t � iI �31 NE 5th St. ) � I (750) *15 ) f -too 0 2 N wz * estimated— intersection z > not counted Q • WINDSOR o in AM ' c 0o APARTMENTS ° csC E L L m cooI �1 -'-- NE 4th St. T 0-182 5� (22,000) 234-0- fi 3 * d-O N LEGEND (XX) 1989 ADT Q' a Traffic signal to M Stop sign EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITY 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY I N not to scale N d M r7 N i �15 L r 19 NE 5th St. II 222� f Inrj NN r7 W Z W Z N WINDSOR o APARTMENTS o E c m N.I-co Nt___22 NE 4th St. ' t ' r-18 13. R 1241—► III 3O—'• i-Tro w ai r ro EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1FIGURE� WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITYf[1. 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY I N not to scale to N N L r 45 NE 5th St. 31� I rn N CO N w Z • Z > WINDSOR o APARTMENTS ° E E a) L m Io° N._9 NE 4th St. ' t ' '805 6. 4 241— III 3—r d-0N New AM Peak Trips Enter Exit U) Heritage Village (30 Apts.) 3 13 Windsor Apartments Daycare 22 20 ' Total 25 33 ro 1990 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITY 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY I 1 not to scale N In N M �-23 MN i L r 29 NE 5th St. II 1 �� re) w w Z Z > ro > • WINDSOR APARTMENTS a E C a) L m °° N Nk_29 NE 4th St. ) 1 L r687 18.. R 1278 tr 31—"k d- r") New PM Peak Trips Enter Exit w Heritage Village (30 Apts.) 14 6 Windsor Apartments Daycare 21 22 Q' Total 35 28 ro 1990 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1FIGURE� WINDSOR APARTMENTS / DAYCARE FACILITY111 s TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY J _ t-te-+its 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the lar are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six mes Renton Hearing Examiner Chambers at his o the gmeeting in the Council on the months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, Wash- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ington,on December 12, 1989,at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ECF; CU-072-89 KingCounty. Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition to serve community residents. Project is XX located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. 5th Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Street. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub 1 i r Notirp Public Notice WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS ' (Public Hearing) R3857 ECF;SA-079-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to trans- form the existing day care center(Building was published on Dec . 1 , 1989 "X") into a maximum of four new residen- tial units (in the event that the proposed day care expansion is not permitted). Pro- ject is located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 5th Street. sum of$ 2 6 . 6 0 Legal descriptions of the filed noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. All interested persons to said Petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- tti 1j J r (1_;/-i1-e 1) ing on December 12, 1989, at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Subscribed and sworn before me this 1st day of De c.._.__19 li 9 December 1, 1989. R3857 Acct. #51067 7 No Public for the State of Washington rY g residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN N87 Revised 4/89 „ ®; CITY OF RENTON ..LL HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman January 8, 1990 Steve Leitzke Leitzke Architects East Point Plaza, Suite 401 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Windsor Place Apartments - Day Care File No. CU-072-89 Dear Mr. Leitzke: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published December 22, 1989 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office •if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 22nd day of December 1989 affiant 9 deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,v 0 day of n � 1989 tn,d allo a Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at l4R E fillip✓ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: CU-072-89 - LEITZKE ARCHITECTS (WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) December 22, 1989 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON- REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS (WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS II) File No: CU-072-89 LOCATION: 4310 Building "A", N.E. Fifth Street (Building "X"). SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is seeking a new Conditional Use Permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approve expansion, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on December 5, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 12, 1989 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map - Exhibit #3 - Location Map Exhibit #4 - Site Plan Exhibit #5:- Elevation Map Exhibit #6 - License for Tender Years Day Care Exhibit #7 Series of Photographs Exhibit #8a - Parent Handbook Exhibit #8b - Brochure Exhibit #9 - Olympia-Renton Comparison of arrivals and departures Exhibit #10 - Petition from parents and residents Exhibit #11 - Letter dated November 20, 1989 to Don Erickson from Ms. Leiker r Leitzke Architects CU-072-89 December 22, 1989 Page 2 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant (Leitzke Architects) is seeking, on behalf of the property owner (Primark Corporation), a revised Conditional Use Permit to allow an existing day care facility to serve other children in addition to those who live in the Windsor Place apartments. Original approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate the day care facility was granted on May 26, 1987. This approval was subject to two conditions including that "the center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of (the Windsor Place apartments)". 2. The address of the subject property is 4310 N.E. Fifth Street, Building "X". The subject property is zoned as Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) and is identified as Office/Office Park on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 3. Land use surrounding the day care facility is mixed. Immediately surrounding the facility is the 202 unit Windsor Place apartment complex. To the north of the subject property are multi- family residences, to the east are single-family residences, to the south there exists both single- family and commercial uses, and to the west there are commercial uses. Existing zoning in the surrounding area is General Use (G-1), Business Use (B-1) and Office Park (O-P). 4. Adequate public service resources and utilities are available to the day care facility. 5. There are 354 parking spaces for the 202 apartment units available at the Windsor Place apartments. Estimated trip generation for the apartment complex is as high as 1,616 trips per - day. Estimated trip generation for increased use of the day care facility by 37 children from places other than Windsor Place apartments is 164 trips per day, with 15 occurring both in A.M. and P.M. peak hours. These estimates indicate a slightly greater than 10 percent increase in traffic may occur if the day care facility is authorized to accept children from other than Windsor Place apartments. The traffic increase would be primarily during off-peak hours. 6. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance on the proposal with specific mitigation conditions regarding traffic circulation and police protection. This Determination and the mitigated conditions were not appealed. 7. The operator of the day care facility is Tender Years, Inc. which has operated the facility since it opened. The operator is a licensed day care provider and has a state license for the existing facility authorizing up to 70 children. Enrollment has ranged over the past year from 8 to 23 children. The operator informs each resident of the Windsor Place apartments of the availability of child care services and offers site views of the facility as part of the standard Windsor Place tour for prospective tenants. Nevertheless, the day care facility has suffered from under-enrollment since it opened. There is not a sufficient number of children within.the Windsor Place apartments of the ages served by the facility to allow Tender Years to operate in a cost-effective manner. The facility receives numerous calls each day regarding the availability of child care services. These requests must be denied because of the current condition placed on the Conditional Use Permit restricting children that may be accepted to only those living at the Windsor Place apartments. 8. Numerous letters were submitted to the Hearing Examiner as part of Exhibit 1 in support of the quality of care provided by Tender Years. These letters also addressed the difficulty of finding quality day care in the Renton area. All other day care facilities in the Renton area have waiting lists for accepting new children. It would be difficult, if not impossible, for parents of children enrolled at Tender Years to find other day care arrangements should Tender Years no longer provide day care services. Obtaining day care for infants less than one year old is particularly difficult. There was one letter submitted in opposition to allowing any children to attend the day care facility from outside Windsor Place apartments. The reason for the opposition was stated as the expected increase in vehicle traffic. A petition in support of the application signed by approximately 40 individuals was also filed with the Hearing Examiner. 9. The City Community Development Department, the property owner, the manager of Windsor Place apartments, and numerous members of the public testified in support of the Conditional Use Permit application at the public hearing. No one testified in opposition to the application. N Leitzke Architects CU-072-89 December 22, 1989 Page 3 10. The same applicant has submitted an application to the City for Site Plan approval to convert the existing day facility into four residential units should this application for a revised Conditional Use Permit be denied. That application, City File No. SA-079-89, was heard by the Hearing Examiner on the same day as this conditional use application. The decision on that application will be issued separately. CONCLUSIONS 1. An applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate the proposed use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) of the Renton Zoning Code. These criteria include requirements that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. Based on the Findings detailed above, and with the conditions imposed below, the proposal,will be in compliance with these criteria; will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public; and will be in the public interest. 2. The continued operation of the day care facility is less of a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan than the apartment complex which now surrounds it. 3. There is a clear and undisputed community need for this type of day care facility. The proposed location best serves those who live within the Windsor Place apartments. However, the area surrounding the facility is mostly multi-family and single-family residences. The need for day care in the immediate vicinity is likely to increase over time. 4. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property if the Conditional Use request is approved. A day care center has operated in the facility for over a year. An increased number of children may bring some additional noise and traffic. However, this will occur during working hours when most residents are absent from their homes. 5. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed facility. The conditions imposed by the City as part of the Determination of Non-Significance will help assure safe and adequate traffic circulation. Although traffic may increase slightly, the "worst case scenario" indicates that vehicle trips would increase by only slightly more than 10 percent over what now exists. This number of vehicle trips could be minimized by the use of car pools for children from outside the Windsor Place apartments and by increasing the number of enrollees from within Windsor Place. 6. The proposed use is as compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses as any use could be. 7. Parking is adequate if specified parking stalls are made available for the exclusive use of parents with children at the day care facility for the purpose of dropping off and picking up their children. 8. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect; landscaping is sufficient to buffer the proposed use; and adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. Leitzke Architects CU-072-89 December 22, 1989 Page 4 9. There is a need for assurance that the day care facility will be allowed to operate on an on- going basis. This would help provide a stable environment for the children who attend the day care. It is extremely difficult to find day care arrangements in the Renton area. Attendees of a day care facility should be provided with ample notice if it is necessary for the parents of the child to find a new day care. 10. Opening the Tender Years day care facility to children from outside the Windsor Place apartments will help make child care more available for all children within Windsor Place apartments. This is because it is necessary for children to be cared for in specified age groupings. Tender Years could offer a full range of day care services if it was able to enroll children from outside the Windsor Place apartments to "fill out" a class. 11. All residents of Windsor Place apartments have knowledge of availability of on-site day care. Increased marketing to these residents would not result in increased enrollment. DECISION The application for a Conditional Use Permit is APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must comply with the conditions required by the Environmental Review Committee in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance issued on November 1, 1989. These include, without limitation, improvements to the roadway on Bremerton Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. Fifth Street; vegetation trimming to increase visibility of stop signs; posting of "Day Care Only" signs for short- term parking; and posting of a police services bond. 2. The applicant may operate the day care facility at the level of attendees licensed and approved by the State of Washington in accordance with Chapter 74.15 RCW. The expired license submitted by the applicant as Exhibit #6 must be renewed and filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner immediately. Failure to comply with this condition within 30 days may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant must make all best efforts to enroll every child who resides at the Windsor Place apartments who is in need of day care. These children shall have priority in enrollment. 4. There shall be no changes in the operation of the day care facility except as authorized herein, or by operation of law, without first notifying the City of the proposed change in operation and holding a public hearing on the proposed change. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of December, 1989. THEODORE PAUL HUNTER HEARING EXAMINER, Pro Tern TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of December, 1989 to the parties of record: Steve Leitzke Leitzke Architects East Point Plaza, Suite 401 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 Richard A. Garner • 4311 N.E. 5th Street, D-102 Renton, WA 98056 Diane E. Seader 21515 S.E. 254th Place Maple Valley, WA 98038 Additional copies of this report will be sent to the Day Care Center to be distributed to other persons who testified at the hearing but for whom there is no address on record. t^l Leitzke Architects - CU-072-89 December 22, 1989 Page 5 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of December, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Brent McFall, Acting Administrative Assistant Kim Scattarella, Senior Engineering SpecialisValley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 5, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I �'�� ' .' f �.' :i•. I .i I1 :'.'Z "„ 4 Eb ,`' {,y . KttJANIS P 'L- f ..J s ,-2. c, , 1,0�—, ••:: al:' s HONEY DEW ;ya«r"' /,` I 1. n %' •A'" — c{ _ rLi`"wc e f— -r�� ELEMENTARY SCHOOL j [ ' { b • 1 r B I r i t 0 I. [ j ff . /�r+ 5T r ,, E ++r_ 1 ) ._,___r .. 11 n ..c i• is{• . .• • .'. JIL' N IE 7-• S7 ' 1. f. :` • _ N.E - I'ry . �'' rm. 3 -1 R-2 �, ! O i r .. ...., ,,,,„_. a: r['.,I• .. . . . .., .i, . , •., . ..• -,,.r '� f W `� .. _ 3 • 1 1 IL '� i 'I• I1 •r I-O . t r� 52.H.,..8+,4„...„,,',. � L.usz`i...}].C. i1i'i .i„, ., 1 "�! • _ • ! Ng ^�T = s �._7.){L'. • • --- . in. DO its ET •� I I �l r ^ _r f I �• .. ' I I 1 .._.. —1\ - e� I R-, ;�:. ••T'-- r.. ._.�_r ''! ' i — • I 3-1 I F1 1 . ...... 15 Asiiii _ . : *°%%*iRU-2 - f 1• . • / 1 , , . 1 1 ....,.... ,...- . ;.• .•... L .. . m .rix ' . r-1- w w •.•-46. ri; •••••••.4 POD-0311-54-9. , r • * ' B- 1 F g,�I R-3 . _ DPIA1 .- T ' J I t J • �7 4T1G •QY%� 5j1... ,• . .. . . 1[�l S I • I I ? 1 ,, „„, L?.1la • /J!' _.. . . ...,. .. /i� r ! r .. Y ,• i I — G-1 1 R-3 1 R-3 C D I .• I . , .. • ,. • . • ___________, ___._ -1- • . t • Windsor Place Apartments Day Care CU-072-89,ECF • • APPLICANT The Leitzke Architec'ts TOTAL AREA 11 .4 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 5th Street EXISTING ZONING R-3 • • EXISTING USE Daycare PROPOSED USE Daycare COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN off-re/Office Park • COMMENTS Located at 4310 Building "X" , N.E . 5th Street ,. . `••t•-c:-,;•:iit.?!-,..1•:'•••, ,' ...,••••-.....:-, ....... \.__1..-1' ..,".-.. ,... . •1§414,74,45,Fi-i.-. .:". -,‘• . , ,: •r.. -0•••o c•r:..c r,• •.o,..3. ..c.••,...:.-.v.;1... mc••.o.• .r.,.....•r::.;;:-•.•••Fs' r•:.r.:.••;•,.:,. .•. • !41; ' - ..6":•d',...?eic'rc•"•:c ''r•'%C s,c'--.-.- 7::•••t,,. . c.„...c.e.:..•- .....„......„.., z.....c..,.,..••„...;..r:•,,:l. •- ` . ..°..1'61N :•c•-•..,-;,7:IC.1;:!'..",1/ 1 .1.7.j.'•:-`•°•-•7"......1: ;:73t... "1••••••°•• , . • •-•••-••,....- .o. . . . ! '''.:"1- c••,.-:•••-•: 1 ••' ili '!..,. • • .„ .. • ...:' . i v:,-,:•::•:.. la :.,;:g,' pap09,00.000-00-0... .. • • .. litii," • .000.000.• • .,., • '27-,.4 i.• : 4.. . ..% ;•7:Ve-c't.:•;is, I •b • • rt. 7: ..„ .. . ... -..,.. :;,•:1,..•••::t... GE T .,„..,„ . , ...;. . ,. .. 1 . ,.. : ,:: ... ,A. 0".1111t,:':;3.:-.`;`::.'''''.',.;;.,i,:,,,- ,:,, ; • •.:: . _ .... . ... .. . ... .. ... .. , IL. .. . III , *°. ---1--...-..... „(. ,. _ „ 1,..7.0 . ‘ ::• .:•'. allir ::•:•••:•:•SP` ` . . _____ .iiiiiiil§i .srmzoI. kraatSri • r. • '.: : filitiv ••• . •- gnus .::::::::•" indirmil ' .. ---'. -- :. :• ,mars : ,__. • iii::::,''';/;ininii 0 • t • • 7......''\ . •''is! _ •o o oo• „•• :. j mine :glum! somes!J .o , EL .__ _..... , , 00000°000, _....... :i ._.,..y 25,1.2; •F;fzi •11.Z.5.!-.1 III 1 ,0 0 0 0 0 ri:x:i*:,:iiiminiir 0 ... COMM Si Zalal- " ,...-.---- -- . - re iitiiiis' 1 • •00000• , -1:1 , 000000 ••••-7;111\kr '::::... 11111 Ert-W:..:.'" , 0000.0..,.;:r 1. I il iiiii!;i::iiiiiii. , •. . iiii§iii:ii ip,..,.. ' r • 00 wave. 0•e... "f.; a i:::i ••--\-.:i..:iiiii iiiiiit Nom . lb. gig •000.0• 000.00 .•J;:a> / :.:.:•:::: Mi . • 0,4 '....." ''''• dit PAK. lit 1:44%:*' '461.1 -..: a s••-• :cfro7o70. ''•'":,•3 0. •f".• .. '•::•.. ,/i.is3 4 IMES 74 lib• • - I •••• • .• I Mg(..:•::::" •..vils_ ::•:::.:,.,....grirl, Immo 1 ...• 0? si .• '. e 1 iMi:: . L.:. ., . .•,• • i • o: um,. =mce . 0.00• ..‘ -.4•.'i .iili;: sib ,.... ,..... i 4,•: .„ • .:74/... ••.•"--•t•NI.-4:••••!9011 •'•. •• 1. :- WO 4i.c. 000 • •• • • •%i•J f • • .ddill 0 0 000000 II 1,4 . .„ 00.000,00,0000000_.0. . . . 00• ... .._...„. .... • I.., ...4 oc).1.1 I. • • • . ..... •:•:•:•:•:•:•:.... . > ••-.•-• • ..e, .\ ........(0:0.•mall*fil,•••:; .;:i:::::::•::::::::::::.. Col I• • •L• ,,. sai .L, .cpd,---s . .. .11111 4484 •• • • • -....,. L• 4. • A ..,e„..1,,t ........i. • • .b • 9.. • -. 0,..: • • • • ,± .. . . Dri74,-...• .....• ikl 111 - 4 .:- Wilt! , *-N ak )..% \. .. . :•;•,... .. . •• ?,:::* _ TI -1 • • •-,• :.'' ,t '°'• ' .--:_, 11::.-.-- . - \ I 1 ::::':::: ill'.•,11:11F:10 6,41 .104101 Iiiir ..00:..-0: .::::::::::::::::,:,:,:„:„„.: 1,..„.,:i,.., ..., .11 !..1.:• 4 1 .. I---- .2..4 4f 'CP 0.1•080°. :::::•:::•:::•:::•:::•:::•:::Iiii:::•:::•:::••::•:::•;:i;y:gi• iiI...i-4.16.4,-1..11.8.11.1114.„_ .... . kir.0......0000. :::::::::::::::•:::::::::,::::.:::.::::: ..••• It tei. A 1.89 . on.:!, .. :,:::::::*::::En :•:•:::,.: :•:•:•%:::.,... _ M.in A ill IN:1! ..:.-.....1.....-- :• 1. _ 'II •••:;:. A .11• Ali .::i,ii:i::. V. •:::::::::::::::::::4::i*:•:,- .-40„0,, - •••• Pk." 141 fp r, -7, 4 .7:7:-:7 •.':•:•:-•;-."... •' iiiT7777:7-00000000°o-O. 1 - 1111.....**F' 7jr•ii!.51w ii"---/15.1111111 •000000000• ! r:'.1 ' i•.:1•:•••:'.7-7'.7..7.:.:•::::iiin Imm i.:::-.- I MI .•::igiiiiii.'-. '*ie:.*::::i.:,• ...,.:.:*: 0-0 0-0-00000000000.•00000000000000000000. . _ ...1,......! .iiiiii ii ..iiiiiii:i t a' CS. ./ . N. a:i:igoi.s.., :*::::•:.•• ..:.:*i:x:i::i:. .0°09)%°0000.3.,000.30_0_0 ..s. *iliiglii i:iiilim:::m• [ Ei Wig'4 .&,,,NRM:IP i.. •••• ...::::§Mgiiiiii.- •VociNoWA*.VoVoiWocrg• .:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::*::".;i:, --7.:4.*iiiiiiiii..iii§iiiii:ii i:i:iii:i::iiix:i::: Viiiir r. V:41: ::.0.i.`e. • •°10oFocgoZto°00:•yocrfoglo000. :: 0.. •::iiiiiiiii• , ••:•:•:•:•:•:•::::4444.•••44,••••••••• • te-z." 'ociPeo°o°o°o°o°o°•.o°8io°o°oVo°o°0* ::::::•:: '?:."3" r .000.011.00.000. / .jj, • •0 4 4::::4•Now •0000000cp0000mov0000000000000000.• !.::::::3::....... 7.• A I•.'ll 0'0-Ca%. ., ::••.iiii!igiii:iii:i •:000000000000000000000000000000000000000. t 1 .::,..::::.:::::: •,) ,WI •0000 1..., 00000• .. •00000• o . ..0 0.00000000 0 00000000 ; I.::_•:.••••••••• ::: ...... lia:::.:.:i.::":.:'.::.::•.:•: imint... .0 0 0 0 0 o o 0• ,‘ • •:•:•:•:•:•: 0 .• • 1 .•.000000000. & .......... .............. ................ '! :i:Kai*MS- ‘1 i,‘..• Nmi •00000000 At, ...::.•.•:•...••• A64,•• 1 IMININ ,-- .............. jr. . zufisiti: •;• CI 1 eil. ... :11.11 rr,...? ...°09iocal°09," if' ::.. ''..:::::::: •‘12 . •.o 0• .12.11 ....::::•:::..........:.. ••"•• iks): 'VS i 1::1 AV", ,, iii:in , •i:::i:M::::::: .0.'0.'644,7'„ft... .....,34. :i*i::.:.::..i*.::::: 00, ,p,,.... I , ..::::::::::::::. . :::::::::::::::::::::::: . .,„„..,..z.-„,,,...•,....,,,„,,,,...„. :.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.i6ifct1.',...,.,,.1..8r.ti•$oi??,....:;;.;',,•••,•,-%•••.•'o.r..hsr,.-•,•,,:,.,c:t gA.ci,.0 tgiIt..,'t"•ti. 1•4:h16 ?.)0-.9i••:,•-:,::.r::,A::.::-:::.F•:.t';>':4;3.;•.':;ir.,?•r`.'-,S.r itf'1•:Ic•?•5•?.1.:,''!,,1•.I'4,S!,,G;;P,::9'-u.;:9.;4•,4•../....g13?,-34,.,30.1.,.:0 .':•:::%•:.:::i':.::,;.:*i::.:i.:i.:i:.::i.:i:...i:.::%..i::.:::.:::':i::.:::':i::EIlIIeP,aP.. ,,,:,.,. :.3.;0)::....•. , , s,./,i,`6'.•.4..' .d..•., .0r - AL #.1.,(i:P'• _ •..5.rii 14• :. . ..c .. „ ._ ....,....tre.-46...... •.:. ,•... ....- -. -- - -. ,.,. (,,. ,.{.,- „A, „, • ... .. ..._,-- .4,611111b "',11.. C,. o•rip, •••••?.:WiilYi;4.113A"..j 4 ,:z.,t.;. •• ., . . ,a, .„.,;:oft.(44 ,! ,-..- ,-,-, tei4 ' ft%;Me.... c• kittpe e.• • .--.•::,'. 1,,,,SI ey,,•9, .:v• 4.... ,,,. Ap". .•?..; - ...A. . . ,x ,:y.f.f.t-,• ' -;:. • .1-+•;•.••.-••‘?P...%).• ...er .L., .. . .1..0.'1.;::q.,..i.•,t,, 41/4ti-.lin ... .'nith .4 h.-. ••In •4 se it:. It.e.•.' •!i,•;: 11111111111111 .4.3,;17;.•,..1.7.:ea,'...,.., .....eR IA.'c.;.;),0.•.14.,_ ainivrc.cp cx.. . 0.•FT.. L. .„ •„,„..,.,.,,, ...„...... ..,...,.,..",...,., \ t•,,..0. 'sf..•t • ... • '41"0!1)111.,.;TO 0..,9-..L'A),-,ca•. (1,,,..,.0. , 11111114 .9.1+1. ., . CUt:.f . •• •• )4.,%!.;;;;.?'1;'•",':6:,is••:•.1v•A .• .. ..,c,,..4.A.,I it z .,"I.- .. •.. ",,...6,,,,„&,..., e).• -,4 ''.;,'`V ig•••0,.. 'V% II'•v00000.000000:000. ILI Pc%:.:AkiV c;Ci el!,•A'.e•i%'il;?.'i'>P' .P.P ----- '.''. '''Ci..biR'SAI.C.WWL ,Crit'AFISiri...6: Wilgi f..r.u.,,:.:?.1.6 j.) ;,,Z..i:. :'J' C::'il re,'.•-•••- ••glall:W:a:iv.41,:•T' oVr•11.‘• ' Ifii o• : lay.i.; • .4.:cr: pgr, rr rcpt.,- , ••,• 444.(.11.1rs,rii•`'.'...'i'...pft."....,, .•''''‘)" ' -.. . • c:.+), ... • c...' ,-. .........-; •15 4,,, ..1,*AT,..7.4 n tr.1,2,. • ,".1.0.?:9,••.13 4:1,1•P r!•••1..0.,'%P.• • 44.k.. vu.,p,...51,1 :1.i3,•!..4:;.41,•1".E...," C.I.,;:c,t71.;?.7r.71::$1•'..:N1<.k.::i:I.,:i.ti.:C.V..%,t'1::A.If:;,:e,„.:to)......, t,to. 4*41!•'...Nob:C••.en56-'4..V.): C.. "' V.2i;•?•••13. ...../.;!t.T:•,?•61 if0•1;'.,i1,?.'e?.11,..it;'-`?4'..,P;. .• • q. .1:`• ' I'''••''6`ett.CP''•''-''''''1%4 2'457'1 m "I:0:f'• '. 4 '• ..-• 41 0 Ct cl:s-ci V:r i,?...4.,‘$0,,-..,•..,.bs.c.b • .:•. ,_ . ..,, .,,o.-1;., 4...,:°%•-•- ••.. ...„......1,.. • 4.0..T.,.(e.,,,,-. ,ivv..F.,,,:..,,040.;”,. :0.. • -, ....,,•„4: •41,._ .. . ;ark' I.-ps‘.. ,_. - -,••• •c:* -.‘ ...P.;...wt: 1,:.•,•,;,....,L.,4Aii,..t74:?;:to. ..'0,-r.ii;I., ,'6.T1'..,A,cds.,*(?.?..M"cr:',Ii.q::031 ' '.'"' .."111/4..ge 's • -.t...0.4 ::.; - V, \ .i. .„,4‘,, k. •P Jo 0°0°0 ••"' •,•.,1,:t.V,*.tr,47,o: , . 'f.,.:•,,,•••-' ..r..11...vi.6:NI••• ' %. 0 o o 0 0 o 4.. •'::i::.:i::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•::... •iti,o....:ci:,•:•Zs" 4: ''"'•.re.•,.4,..`.?.`g .. • Vo°0°06 • .•:::i:i:ii:iii§:ii:iiiiiiiii:::...... 1,-Y1W.74..;),.1,,I.5#I., , . c...,•.1.•.'. .•r.4 et•_ ,•.;„,,r,. .,! • - ..c;A::,-, :000000. -.:,.\000.00 :::::::.;::::.&::,...4-..7.;.A.;a!. 7' 1141P ri% • '•• - ',r it t•stk.,Itee ..:. ----. .....•.. . . ,. , , 000 •c, 000 "...t•.,;',g. ., * i.. r.,kr. 0 0.• .q.. -0- :-.....,•-. •••• ;,•%,.1),.,. . • .. .....;£''';• ;.%:;:::.;•ti:1;;'...•,;'•i.!e;' .0.0..,0 '0.;•4,1' . • 1 ii,:;*.N.'''•••,..1 •.•.? ,....•.. •• *,-• • . ------ :••••_' .', ::.:.iii:: :::iiiii:iii. .4,4•1;•9% • t. mil oo o oo • ••• ,.NW im4..0.0.00000000000..• .,,,..e,e 4,4., .00o:23:004;:.. .0 : 1-."-t.AID USE .ELEMENT 0 0• •o 0 . (", •o• • e r. 00. 4 , • a. Ik• 11 'Cis. t....%.,....:1.(1 Single Family . -4 • . i,:..'"Ii.,. lin, j Commercial :..K.:i::.•"..2. •.TLos."- t ?_k•tei. •::*.'•:§:.• W.,*. I --.7'•••• 6'6 60 o 0 s00000 • 7=7.7.77 0:0:0000:;• .\ , • 30000.0.0.00 ---. ...•‘ ................... Low Density .. c,c,... Office / Office Par+ -oc,c,c.oc, - .•,,, 0.0... Multi-Family ,D0009,000,30.! , 4 - NIVIs i•.:* :.' • • ;,(2 6.0000000000.. , • ..,.9, I • . a:0)0004:pa t, • .0000000 T31r, • {N piiiiiiM• Medium Density oc,00.00. .0c,oc,,,,c,,, •:--•y;i:' :,. • 00.00,,.. Public/Quasi-Publil ,...t , 121,.;- • . • r). 1 Multi-Family ..000000.000.00, 1 • / •91.4., ga . . • • .--/ ,.. ..,., .,t, • •70., i;, .;';.:• 11 . I Light Industrial ;:z.,-...-•::1.,:i,r . N 1•0g•p .:ai ,.. .••••-5.7:9'. ' :::•iNNIa.it.. •:.:1 • 0 IV'-:!:.::-/," :.:......!" . c.c.- 0••••ve.• •"3 • r,"f• :11,::-.1... •, -1 Recreation Recreation • ...... Heavy Industrial ,y ... - • . \. ••••••••••• 1 •• . . ‘, • ••• • e•':'•-e•....• „ ,-, \}... _D----, ::::•-_......„ , ,1, • ••,-,„ • •.:=.,.....,... 1 1,•,'-';',1•;,/.4? minim NI, . . . . .x :. • Greenbelt ii::::::::::::: Manufacturing Parl , - .:4i" 4' 11::14:111t .k Pail'. • - / Multiple Ontioi , • -oviisKX • .4----- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects FILE NUMBER: ECF; CU-072-89 LOCATION: 4310 Building "A", N.E. Fifth St. (Building "X") A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Primark Corporation 2. Applicant: The Leitzke Architects 3 . Existing Zoning: Medium Density Multi-Family Residential, R-3 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: General Use, G-1; Business Use, B-1; Office Park, 0-P. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Office/Office Park 6. Size of Property: Total Property: 11.4 acres; Project Area: 3, 639 square feet. 7. Access: N.E. Fourth Street and Bremerton Ave. N.E. 8. Land Use: Medium Density Multi-Family 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Medium Density Multi- Family Residential East: Single-Family Residential South: Single-Family Residential; Commercial Use. West: Commercial Use. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation N/A 2290 11-23-1966 Partial rezone G-1 to R-575 R-3 -69 2482 5-23-1969 Rezone of remaining R-119- 2 .9 acres G-1 to R-3 1987 4097 11-16-1987 'PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THEE HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care I.:;;;.. PUBLIC HEARING December 12, 1989 ,,` Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A twelve inch water line runs along Bremerton Ave. N.E. b. Sewer: An eight inch sewer line runs along Bremerton Ave. N.E. c. Storm Water Drainage: A 43 inch by 27 inch corrugated metal arch pipe runs westerly along N.E. Fifth Street and drains into a 24 inch pipe at Union Ave. N.E. where it drains to the south. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro route 147 runs along N.E. Fourth Street from Monroe Ave. N.E. to 144 Ave. S.E. Metro route 114 runs along Union Ave. N.E. from N.E. Fourth Street to N.E. Seventh Street. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Maplewood Heights Elementary School is approximately one mile southeast of the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately one a and one-third miles northwest of the subject site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately one mile subject site. northeast of the .7, 5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is approximately three-quarters mile northeast of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permits. 2. Section 4-738, Site Plan Review. 9 3 . Section 4-709A, Medium Density Multi-Family Use F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55-60) . 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16) . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. In 1987 the applicant obtained site plan approval for development of a 202 unit multi-family residential complex on the subject property, as permitted by the existing zoning designation for R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use. Simultaneously, the proponent received a conditional use permit under the R-3 designation in order to offer day care services in Building "X" on the subject site; the day care program was limited by the Hearing Examiner to a maximum of 60 children and enrollment was restricted to children belonging either to residents or employees of the complex. (See attached Hearing Examiner Report of May 26, 1987) . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care PUBLIC HEARING December 12, 1989 Page 3 The day care program has been in operation for approximately one year -- enrollment has ranged from eight children last year to 23 children currently (with several attending on a part-day basis) . With this level of use (the center is now operating at one-third capacity based upon a dwelling unit occupancy rate of approximately 80%) the proponent wishes to maintain the day care center, but under these circumstances, it is not economically feasible to do ;,. ,. so. As a result an application has been made to revise the conditional use permit to allow open enrollment to serve children throughout the community to maximum capacity. Based upon requests by parents of children currently enrolled in the program that the center be maintained, upon documented increases in residential development and employment opportunities in the City (cite: Community Profile of Renton) which would provide a population for the center and upon the fact that other vicinity day care facilities are heavily subscribed (cite: interviews with operators of Kindercare, Renton Child Care, Park Place Junction) staff are willing to support the expansion of the Windsor Place Day Care Center. However, staff will recommend that this expansion be approved for a limited number of children and on a temporary basis, with the applicant being required to make every reasonable effort during this time-limited expansion to achieve full enrollment with children of residents or employees (such as subsidies and/or discounts for children) , and with requirements for conditions designed to mitigate identified environmental impacts (e.g. traffic, light and glare, protection of persons and property) as described below. Note: In the event that the expansion of the existing conditional use permit is not approved, the applicant is seeking to convert Building "X" to four residential units (see corollary application, file number SAS 079-89) . 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21X, 1971, as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on November 1, 1989, with the following' conditions: a. That the proponent mitigate on-site and off-site circulation impacts as follows: a) post a W-14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Avenue immediately north of N.E. 5th Street; b) post a Type III barricade in the "T" of the intersection of N.E. 5th Street; c) improve roadway on Bremerton Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 5th Street with gravel fill sufficient to eliminate abrupt shoulders on that right-of-way; d) trim vegetation on the northeast corner of Union avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north; and e) post "Day Care Only" sign on the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short-term parking for parents transporting children (provision of on-site parking for day care employees must be made elsewhere in the development) . b. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services management bond in the amount of $10,200. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. Note: At the time of review of the conditional use permit staff will recommend approval of a a temporary permit, for a period of two years, and require that the applicant provide an agreement consenting to give enrollment priority to children residing in the Windsor Place Complex during that time period. At the end of the two year pilot period, if the center is not fully subscribed to by residents, the conditional use application may be reviewed for either a continuing period of two years ,; or for the granting of a standard conditional use permit, without time Ylf limitations. ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care PUBLIC HEARING December 12, 1989 Page 4 3. Representatives of various. City departments have reviewed and commented upon this application. Their comments are integrated into the body of this report. 4. The City of Renton Zoning Ordinance requires that the Hearing Examiner consider the following criteria, together with other relevant information, when evaluating an application for a Conditional Use Permit: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton: The proposed expanded day care center, intended to serve "off- campus" children, is as compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation, and as compatible with goals, policies and objectives for residential development, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan as is the residential day care center which was approved in 1987. Additionally, the proposed expansion would continue to be consistent with development standards for the R-3 zone, as no modifications are planned to the structure or to exterior improvements, except for modifications to travel corridors and parking areas to ensure safe, efficient access to the day care facility. Finally, the center conforms to all local and State guidelines which regulate structural standards and operations for day care centers. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: 1. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use: Northeast Renton, the sector in which the subject site is located, is experiencing considerable growth, both in residential development and with employment centers. As such, there is substantial need for day care centers -- three centers in the area now are at or near enrollment capacity. Therefore, it appears that it would be appropriate to provide additional day care services at this location. 2 . That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use: The existing center is well-suited for location at this site when use is confined to residents/employees as determined at the time of initial permitting in 1987. In order for the center to be suitable for expansion to permit enrollment by community children, impacts from that expansion -- particularly increased vehicle and pedestrian traffic -- should be mitigated either through established environmental mitigation measures or through measures established in conjunction with the review of this conditional use permit application. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be ;.: established: SJ;f[r Y r:i 'PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE' HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care PUBLIC HEARING December 12, 1989 Page 5 1. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R-1 and R-21 shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage of the residential development in general and of Buildingin "X" particular comply with Zoning Ordinance development standards. No changes in lot coverage are proposed. 2. Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the .s; structures shall not be allowed in any required yard. Existing yards serving the residential development in general, including Building "X" , conform to Zoning Ordinance development standards. No changes to yards are proposed. 3 . Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. Building "X" is consistent with height requirements for the R— :; 3 zone. No changes to the structure are proposed. d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood: g As noted both in the initial application for a conditional use permit for a day care center for children of residents and employees and previously in this report, the 60-space day care center is basically compatible with the surrounding residential complex. The introduction of children from off-campus introduces the potential for a variety of new/increased impacts to the site and surrounding community (e.g. traffic, noise, light and glare) , which must be mitigated in order to maintain the existing compatibility of uses. Recommendations to protect compatibility -- e.g. restrictions to the number of off-campus patrons, time-limited permit expansion, vehicle circulation improvements, improvements to public services -- are discussed in appropriate specific sections of this report. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged: The number of existing parking spaces on the site will not be altered, however, those spaces located adjacent to the day care center will be reserved for use by day care patrons and employees. Sufficient parking exists elsewhere on the site to accommodate residents and guests of Windsor Place. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care PUBLIC HEARING December 12, 1989 Page 6 • The introduction of children from off-campus to the day care center is likely to have a notable impact upon vehicle and pedestrian circulation patterns. Based upon this likelihood, staff required the applicant to provide a traffic analysis, based on a likely "worst case scenario", assuming an enrollment of 50 children from off-campus and ten children from on-campus (in fact, eight children were enrolled in the day care center when this application was f,.;. submitted, however, approximately 20 children -- one-third the t, capacity -- are now enrolled, with a number attending only on a part-day basis) . Utilizing study findings reporting a total of approximately 183 new vehicle trips (16 a.m. peak and 20 p.m. peak) per day for fifty new ' children, the City's Transportation Systems Division recommended mitigation measures described above in Section G.2 .a. of this report. These mitigation measures were determined to be sufficient to eliminate any undue burden on public improvements and to sufficiently reduce impacts to inhabitants of neighboring developments in the event that this "likely worst case scenario" 'i occurs. . The applicant reports that the recent increase in enrollment to the current 23 children would also serve to reduce traffic impacts, °'.., since with the maximum enrollment of 60 students, only 37 children could be accepted from the community. As this number could fluctuate, staff continues to be of the opinion that planning for. the most intensive impacts is appropriate to address traffic ;;': considerations. Staff recommendations for limits on enrollment of off-campus children and expansion for a limited time period could further mitigate traffic impactsover the short-range and long- range. g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Increased noise and glare to the site and to neighboring properties may be anticipated with an increase in vehicles bringing off-campus children to the day care center. Traffic mitigation measures designed to maintain acceptable speed and flow patterns are anticipated to mitigate these impacts in part. Landscaping on the site should also serve to limit glare to dwelling units from vehicles delivering and retrieving children. No increase in noise and glare impacts is anticipated from the operation of the center with enrollment of 60 children; mitigation measures established in conjunction with the initial conditional use permit remain adequate. h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Landscaping requirements established in consideration of the day care center have been addressed. As these requirements were established to mitigate the existing structure and play area (for which no change is being considered) and for the currently permitted maximum of 60 children, no additional landscaping is recommended. i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses, such as day schools„ shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use districts in which they are , located. f:` +jl•. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Windsor Place II Day Care := PUBLIC HEARING S. ,' December 12, 1989 ,�" Page 7 !:t The existing day care center meets all standards for a conditional use permit in the R-3 zone -- because no structural expansion is sought this criterion is not applicable. j . Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This criterion is not applicable for the expansion of the now- approved conditional use. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be J' . adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities utilities and/or services. Adequate public service resources and public utilities are available to provide standard, anticipated services to this residential complex and day care center. Based upon traffic impacts and upon the introduction of non- resident patrons to the site (increasing potential for a variety of accidents and/or deliberate incidents -- e.g. trespass or vandalism) , there is a reasonable possibility that there will be an increased number of calls for police services. To militate against that impact, the Environmental Review Committee has established a condition for an extraordinary services management bond (See Section G.2.b above) . H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed expansion of the existing conditional use permit for a day care center at the Windsor Place Apartments, (file number 072-89) subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant conform to all conditions required by the Environmental Review Committee in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, issued on November 1, 1989. 2. That the applicant limit the off-campus enrollment to a maximum of 25 children. Records shall be kept by the day care center staff for review by City staff. 3. That the applicant undertake a marketing campaign, subject to approval by the Planning Division, to attract on-campus children to the day care center, and that those children receive priority . consideration for available spaces. (Note: The parents of enrolled off-campus children shall be provided with reasonable advance notice if their children are to be removed from the center in order to accommodate on-campus children) . 4 . That the applicant agree to limit enrollment opportunities for off-campus children to a maximum period of two years. (Note: The City may consider an application of extension of the expansion of service to the community, if the applicant provides evidence that all reasonable measures have been taken to achieve capacity enrollment from the residential/employee population on this site) . • ,,. \ . _ • •, „ 1...•••,;••••:c."1.- • • • •• •11,„.4,- z,1 WI 1-74--- • ••. ;.• .7-77,-,:•.ft,--- -., 1-- . 1.--:".. I- . •---, IN-!,!,...f., ,-; — - ; .:i...::1 :.m-717,---;----..4, u, cp ii: KIWANtS ,6: ••• ,I.: - 1 , , ) . cl'ARK . 1 . _ L.....„ .. 4 . ___ e , 7' :.:a.: t '‘..1.,"t,,...%.-N..--1; . ' ' ..:-2:. . . , , _ ... --,N.. ; -. ,. ' ' 9 • a - • .::-) ' 1 I:L2'.-- ' :'7 "2%- I- 'T..' .' s I .; HONEY DEW • . ;.);Ite'' . : • .. A „ ; - .. i'. . .j 1 1_0._, . i'•• , ,.1 _;,i a *- • ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \/?: •••-i ,...7..—"...._ -;! ..0•. si/• ..i..E2 ..'' : -, . rilM '2111 1 . I V, _. . !T .. .. ! , . •,1_, • , lJ1..jj .r......1.1,, . I ' •-.,--.z.r.s.*E4 •'. si 7 ___/ ,...,4 . . . •, . . .. . .. r.:• sr. - , . 4 'S 14 ! 9 R-t ..:.*. 1.. .....i:. .7 ::..: i..i,1:..:i.•ii , .!. . _ _ ;/ 1 I - : .. N E7---;--I ' a • • n. .. • . R .. .. . ..:.. •...:. : . ., -1.:, •111, -,--0 i SI . ... • a , 'r. 2 — 5 6. / 18 5 co i 14 lis •: i Pt ..-. .1 ,s,".111.1._ In - . .• • . c ..) il,in, ..'.-•' '• • 1 ,1 . • • 1 1. T ...C7'-• ...7 ,ign '.•• .I . • •rs i.lin,. .41 im,r 1. (..\\.A.:\'1:.>"*...... -47::no 1, . . • f. . r • - . ..R-.1 I R-2 • • ''' . .. , N.e 7 -'-- '!- 1. ',...\5_>,)",?•• ,..\. _Meg ,• fri . .›-z '1 , x '•..11.1%.,/ii,T.., ..j i..,...11,1.;7. \,.\:_,Gi.4. ,.; ,,t, ,. . ..-6 :711s .1-12L'il....•11-13-' 7 ---7 ••• . . ., . - • •I_ I- • • . • '!, - • • . . ..z.,i•;, .1.!•L•4!.,,,,,," , : i' .-:- •1 ii .,•r . •'.1 N. :':i i.. I i '1'. .11. , 1 1. ..—c5 ;• , cr • • I A I- '..:.' i. f :• 7.3. , •.''.1 2,7. Lil .Z.- .. 1 It_.-g• ... 7.:., . -H----7 . a1 , , •,!„. • i , ‘' • . - 1:1 . . ... L4 VI• 0 •Qi T° 11110,3 .,, s .• , ,, ,,,,., i; . : . ..• , _„.i i . ,...,:, k. . ...•......,.........0,. .1 ..11.1../.41.11.11.11 1...4 . , • ...;.0.. ,, .-----r. • • 1 - I En 7" ' - I I -----R.—I • !LLL], Nil • • • • _. . . .... . . . • •• • —, , 1 G—t 1 ' . ••. . •— . • ! • 1 G-1 i / ._ 1 1 ****ss%%4‘s 4 R-2 - - '• • _ • . - • -It”4"- )-_, • t;\*;%*•4144...:S I. 19 .. R-: .i: :41%. L es : •.., ,,..,,.. ...... . ...• . .* _. . -.-..4r* a —ill ..•40:* i -- i .` ••• ' • --- .F-0015- 061H-51-1•• ••••• • .md't 1 , .• • 0%4. N 1.,, 4. . • • 0 : ..- • . _ ,., ' • I I ' ' . :,. . - . . • .. R 3 . _ ... . •. . . . . ., I • B- 1 . ..., , ..' - B r--I L') R-3 • 'I r. oriro : T . . . • I w . I .• „.. .. . .. . .1. • . • -J • — 4 Jill. • . ST.: 5 -- r , ..7. . . . . L • .14 . • . ,, p_i\ F C./ I 1 / 2 i _ i D . ..• - ' • ... 0-P.. - •I/ t7 GRE EN\\A/E)0D / , . i , 1 I I " i• . i 1 ___ . "-- -`i--- -R-3 I G-1 . .. ,._. , ,. .. i I RI G-41 8- . .' . .•..... . . . :•. . • • , ____ ______ _..• cr - . Z C D I' . • •• $. I I. i.. I . .• . • . • N 2 mo -1.• . . . . , . . .. . _ , ..1 • . , • • Windsor Place Apartments Day Care CU-072-89,ECF • . . . • APPLICANT The Leitzke Architects TOTAL AREA 11 . 4 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 5th Street . . EXISTING ZONING R-3 . • EXISTING USE Daycare PROPOSED USE Daycare COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 6-Ef-r&plOffice Park • COMMENTS Located at 4310 Building "X" , N.E . 5th Street ,-5.r..... .. • rii- ,:-f..: • •,,,,,,,,;,:•.• in,.:=3-• .„..:;,::,• ,...0,...-., . 1.q.1,,,'•;•:-. . • . ,...::';;,• •• . . . .'..i::, • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: Windsor Place II Day Care DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4310 Building "A" , N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . • LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division • The City of Renton Environmental Review"-'Cbmmittee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 6, 1989 . The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period will run concurrently. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , November 21, 1989, in order to be considered. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 6, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: November 1, . 1989 SIGNATURES:• enneth E. pyht to Community Development Depart ent Lynn . G ttman, Director Publi Woks Department • �.� �` ) DETERMINATION OF; NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Windsor Place II Day Care PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-072-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4310 Building "A" , N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the proponent mitigate on-site and off-site circulation impacts as follows: a) post a W-14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Avenue immediately north of N.E. 5th Street; b) post a Type III barricade in the "T" of the intersection of N.E. 5th Street; c) improve roadway on Bremerton Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 5th Street with gravel fill sufficient to eliminate abrupt shoulders on that right-of-way; d) trim vegetation on the northeast corner of Union avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north; and e) post "Day Care Only" sign on the existing parking, stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short-term parking for parents transporting children (provision of on-site parking for day care employees must be made elsewhere in the development) . 2. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services . management bond in the amount of $10, 200. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. Note: At the time of review of the conditional use permit staff will recommend approval of a a temporary permit, for a period of two years, and require that the applicant provide an agreement consenting to give service priority to children residing in the Windsor Place Complex during that time period. At the end of the two year pilot period, if the center is not fully subscribed to by residents, the conditional use application may be reviewed for either a continuing period of two years or for the granting of a standard conditional use permit, without time limitations. mmdoc RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .:r I. ' l r ,, `• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , • •- '' it 1�;i`� . .:i f.,i.id:_i i•Q;J REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Lv y •• �a 6 E `� li:..: , JUL 7 1989 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20; :198,9i, pa.;.; , gvir, EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 . PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke .;-` PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care • • .BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing daycare services 'for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently 'undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 • .children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center. into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • • 1. Earth ° . . . 2 . Air ° . . 3 . Water . ° . . 4 . Plants ° . . . 5. Animals ' . . . . 6. Energy & Natural Resources, . 7 . Environmental Health ° . . 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° • . • • 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics . . . j , • PLANNMG DIVISION 11. Light & Glare • ' CITYOFRENTON 12. Recreation •• ` ° JUL a() 7 1989 . 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • ' REQE'VED • ; , . 14 . Transportation ° , . ° 15. Public Services . • j ° 16. Utili ies ° `�yC� . -�_�� .;� f�.c ..cam .mac ,_. � �' COMMENT : G'Zc', ar.-CtG Erc'--P P e-eQ�-/ !mac,C.Q-2 eneir7e:: ,,:zeg---e7 OQ CG7'L/ -' � .9 1 -e %-c(--- We have rg n ithiewed this aic particula atte tion to those areas : ;. ;. in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ..ti.: .; : areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this • prop.: /--- 2(1.: ‘-''' 4 . ( .` 7-- P--7 Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 Ullluy . USu. in the event 1,- -,t this conditional use is. not •supported by the Cizy, the applicant will sec- , to convert the da care center into four apartment units. y LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street 'SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1. Earth IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY Air ° 2 • •— .,3 . Water ° ° • - 4. Plants ° • • . ;5. • Animals • 1 • . . .6. Energy & Natural Resources • : . 7'•" . Environmental Health . . . .8 . Land & Shoreline Use . ' 9. Housing ° ' 10. Aesthetics • . ° • ° 11. Light & Glare ° . 12. Recreation • . ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation • ' ' • . '14. Transportation . , i • . 15. Public Services 0 • . • ° • . I • . 16. Utilities . I COMMENTS: 45 . 0..-� ca:f ev-w a_ v,,.t 1 G to s �L tt �}. .J._ co o., C...ryC- v,�c e..e,�,,,�w,o ,pd <'� a J. / L wi o. 1--- t� r Q. Pnr v11t / 7—'o z o-rV�\ v..l _ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. g4U,-A_ Z__. up") t . . - 7 / _7 Signature f Director or Auth•vized Representative • Da e Rev. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . G U ( . . 1 X APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • l iZ� ,y C. (444_• f DATE 7-/ 0-'7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • 7%• REV. 6/88 LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE . . PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 317i.ryyl ' (.0 ,cam. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE L% I) SIGNATUR E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: .: ' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO • NOT APPROVED LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-W TER T C a2 . (,o 3 C, . '-&g 1 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEt'! I p' ' '7`- J e�4 C SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE^Va'1TEZ l_`1 � 35 3.0.ao �670 � SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHANCE-SE►::E;t: 3 GC:•w� �- o2DoZ t " rb 474 14'421i SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA -!;::':':r ! ; Pr- i`3.SD°DX9� SPECIAL ASSESSMENT R, . 'f�1E Unn 4 Sf Wet UuE,S fog _.. I C!'FZSYED WATER Pll;') R VLAtE T{AVE tut86E►J �,.. . i He Q:&UigEO O't 'Die- ,„,„ „ri..._'.r.D SEVER Plf ' w+Nur e A M�t'1�D CRY AT ENE ?ttEs�.rt I FIRE 0 1l0 iNPReveNEkrr oe Avv-rrio� 'roqg .. :. ter.r r,� ; OK • 1+c S�c33ta' Pa03ECT MIMI. Be ma - ton-IL SHE ABoig ((Ii tiTifS Age • • 140 ,Aa , -Ep IV ime Cl,Y. doh IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 A TH RIZED REPRESENTATI DATE 7_ —8'9 ,VE ;U11uliL—,.,1.1 ,1_,,, , , . In alopused expansion to sere ' approximately 60 nildren (including the approximately eight childrei larrently using the ervice) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional se is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. tLOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: • • • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE - • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: li)Ut JO'l I 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH .CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED i/ ii,i,yov wa. I5U crt Sly ye �( Guts . .7-1/A tiv, &-ctwc_k a .-K . 1 . . . , . . .,2 __p . .tAkm,v.„D\41)kijki • DATE U-11 9 SIGNATURE OF IQI ECTOi/OR AUTHORIZED REP RESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 6224.iCOMMENTS: 11r'� Fi, ..��i —S' 4 E'i A/s' ./r' p ivy ec,67 o , .'c7 ,9 2,6x c 4 e,� ,As' / is si,97 E , /c£vreP AO.e3 s/'rnzj ,Yo /l9TE, " vf'g.e 7fi`E CW4eD.eE.c/ co H, j , e7,n, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative �a� :;, to Rev. 6/88 LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street 'TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' i SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION is FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: i ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: T,2 A F F'i c, E N nIN EE"se )AG 1 APPROVED ii APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ` ' ,,_[�, n L NOT APPROVED 1 ll D(� : A t 90. �� c'a p ci i' �.-hi . ; 1 15 e r5' / �-t 4-4-PJ teuz 1 Co-r-h.k_t_22.4-4-eAP el a •--0 e 0-jai �,.,_r.� ± 72 of ' . 1-- -1 _..c - 7c.) r 4 '4` 6 ' i ©,b ec, J' 7?ki's{-41-''-`1 P'`-e-- 1 d.4----04-s it: '/nv'� ep 4 .L___LOA ' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE a�J 9�. REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: __K. APPROVED � • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �� rfiiY 1 i :'.. I ur^','.' 7 i t, 4; IGNATURE OF DIRECTO 5r- s�d • ' DA1544,Zalleif R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATTv . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' '' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6(A r(eV�, flanni.n DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 • COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: .Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing daycare services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently, undersubscribed and not economically viable.. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant. will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1. Earth IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ° ° ° 2. Air ° ° ° °. 3. Water ° ° ° ° 4. Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° / ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° • ° 11. Light & Glare ° `/ ° ° 12. Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation ° V ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services ' ° ° ° 16. Utilities ' COMMENTS: )110 tLA kl We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or . ;• areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this :w proposal. R \...:L,.. i, A/ co- - -5' (,\ h.� Signature ,f Dire for or Authorized Representative Date , Rev. 6/88 • PLANT KEY wv -w B me F. ism /: • ; • e s C....6........... mow. - 7wF. -am premera .i ; ` . . • doe z� - .yam 0 G.... L�R29 :.�/. ....# ...✓•�..... H._ ..L.,i .cr�s ...e.�.. .., D.D macerIMT[b r�Jlwltrb ooraur DA..lt K[pf PL1+rTDY T an beM_ -o T.c.r-. "tw.Do es.ca cr,..,-. ve.,a.�.. .o cum. .e.c... 0 r ._ ._ .0O 7•.."c. �A • ` 1 "I " "- '.aoowl •l� ) _ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND NOTES -- SYMBOL DESCRIPTION e• ,.1.11.C.0 - _ nsro.`DECI.O.s.�• no[[. 1 N..D .T[. NICE.;,.UTILITIES. ' 0 wlwl •..D•E}A<1e_11• T., ITN••A.[w.K 0.D Sae AT TINT OP ates, [Cal.ATIL T L..,T..[.]..[ []T..LI.KD. `. `t`'" ICA wu..S*C. OUE DM rates, :r •f .•V.SIZE 3-1%.CAL., I .[{•-{-. PIT L ANT rwwl.s C.[ -•-y,�..t`�_c N�-.�c Kt.1`TTw;o[e PLO... caw A [i[[Ca K[ov' .f K.1 rA(.IQ).w L -` .•nas ea ry' - . A.., TAND..LI K�T.ST I TT L• 1IGwr u' •. • O ITING a;w NATTY r m.K... r S-u_--... e.ae......• -w..ree -- iwlup....L.a w•K]1D[fln[3 C . `e- qal.,. 0..--.-C� {TYPE•o ..G.fwSO K "1000 T [Ai\-1h')AND {-J•Dw TT, [rNG I). GAADT ® Iwsu TOPS f TOCt`AG`r[NL Huw1D•t)wlwln.w0] CAN AKA�G [oi jp'� .w• - `" ®mow e<]-r N i A-.•SPREAD,1[. uno o•.n[.�Trn UM. )u]]TNAw _ Ma. - '- _ S:s. roe Tire{(Cc.lnw.),)1-{•N.,I]-U'.) s...r; c1 e;Iwo - - A0.� !v)Gwi saw.[]... TOE..ca p D DL4r...G..11 S.. 3. CO.. .K r0 L ]T•.DT.D/O• P. 01.0 UcMT ITIe.i:LIZTO 0 ei. .I 0 •^-• w..111]roc[. E 1 csHue.K):"1}-11•S n[`Iw(S[Al-sH4o.K): •.) a.. -11; M..TUT 1 05a.OR LOBE sw10):•4eie•w .u0. r[D. LIEU TO swI¢[•.oLwO• w SEEN-... Gwt ',re•iol`Joi[L� "):uiir•r.• o•" .Nsrs •T nw[or r...TAP ro.eT.2-1•.c r•mH UPI,As PTA NAwe- O�•'_ - ,_.......w GO CC. .1 LISTA0 ART'w 1•N. ].' ANKA•t[O.Knwr10M.Ao- ANT[`•, a e....r.r✓. OLCIGLOUs Speen. .u..v 0}1r TS a.LT)K 10 rAAAAAA 1r.r I1 G.M MUM,. - tlKa 000 S Cu, )CT L: UTMµ ou.K To A.•,DN..P4.l G ;e .nH 1: u- u ; [ n[[. • }..Nr,C. Les )TTYPO Own), S TYH 1 K .64K ) A) u w{-`Q-N. •r.0 -S OZ.•u s.u• �`Yc 0 TN.w[CANTS 1IA AM W nr.S ARE 050E.-/•e l 0 GwE). - OI.Nm• Cw .Lu W..r _ U•.S[Y CALIPER, SIZES LISTED A..MM..AT ri..or PLANTIK, • ;)T AZO GALL. ^;cw_T:u..r LAw.T..)•APPLY AS•[•NANO- �T _ _.Au AT c. Y1 COAAAAAoUS[vu EN 1..UR. [ON.O.w.K TO.•w •.[ c STA....r0. UCi °Q .c.S[.T MCA.G`r[ Tsr•W.K): 1}-1)•SnuCe rr e,I(sal-SH.•DIK): Cr re R' e[n Owl;irlo 1,S.ue.[;l Ire.s. L1 GRAN Tule �� �q �F,Vim.. J OIN 1}_I)•S•.u0 IL.1S•. TYPE S(1w0•D V.u01K AK ON,):Is-.S•a .. ISISN GINNING OP.LA.• - _ [..TILT}`.A a ww. - •[L [-v.T14.WL..e006.41.1.80- a IT.NINTH IPA.. •Ll CONIITT[.nCTETNS TO S<S{S O•.. •)O L [. 1 SOYA.r T W-MKa tiyw_ _.....c.a FtT.r• PW - f0o0[0 LIME Uf[MD 1 QUALM TYI. [Mu•lD 1wGulf., OTnE• STD. •N;N;w.io{IN 1,000E.Q CIO.o SW- ` ` p ��..HovtD suP.L.u. evu cuo<T» FUNKS, 1.ec.:owOTILL s��D.a To AV � n`nT�^ ��^ - 7� • i SoeIK,O; TACT TO COKE SOW MD,1`CO. /V I� S[[O.D LAv:., USE IM MIKTON STATE PRASETw[M•s ASSOCIAT(ew 4M0KD. �.eLl.•I wi•IN U.. - - �ww ^�-�a pa M p0......... n�fin- ..Are w��11.Mr A.[A]n -.�w• �. S[Caw �NG.AIT[.Tr NO... TAP WIT.•{-}-e rex AT ©r• �a.ii.b'+ .10 OF 10 L 0 SQUAT(IZeri /'11 O • .--riot.-, <e:.,e.Ge.tee.+.c.._.... •.....,-.o ULOT :; .LIUTIO«Dr v ©`.^..,` / �vG� wUl GCO•Ae.1A.Ko OLDS •IKKL.IDN ;-NINIRLIN O IN e'Aw wwa m ALI.0 r..O.N.Nwu, Drw,GRIND,Deuve.eD Alt.D 10. TNT IN LANDSCAPE Co.MACTD.SNP..PROVIDE•PULL M.TT.Gw.ANnE I • OM AL AS .QUI.EO wliw LI.E SITE MO•I.. L. • • IL,K UTIMS w ll S[TONI TTED WITHOUT TM • will TUN AP ROVALEOr d^.p;M,.IUDS...011ITCCT O.0.010. •TAT•er iieru[DLiTDfoi`ae:n.ecT�EIroN.Tu[cE.rlrlON OP.TNT gsc.rtr•.4.I1K•R iR r ';',.;':1• ' Tamarack Dt)slgrsMCro1_.p/SCF �„r21". • - I PIED ON TN[•EGISTOATIA i00,0.TN .1T[CT•S SIG./ATM L.�...•..�... a.•.T t( ON IS DTA a oSNAIL`PIANOI.PLAN..1.1 •ES2.11•LE NO.LIAR.ION L,�?' 1'.'- [wE il.e..w w.e► �"� • `9' '_sue sssTYT '� 'o : 2 'Y 'OI 1 V • BAasin rev NOTES, l. 4S v: N•Yr1Tc 1. rA,Ds Smexam ME ACCT.BT TEN vRs� .Niearrm r N RANn Apo COPS COTS sRAu Nvi E[Nxm+rim R '�'^'fin i:r:;•.713 _:b�.o a' - W'a•-'.s1ail .�•:slir .'ra SM.BANE A MINIMS CT. note 01 Pau,armors tN LEVL GMT.TAAS INCHES. 1- .� r- i►c?if'•_r05.omG i_':?-a:%r•. v.�--^i'.*1 I }. wart Cr runs SHALL NOT BC S2ZnL xiNAN 1 CAL A e' KTSN AS ALYSNiBLE Ip I:r Or TRAM OeMn MALL 14K ' -�./ �. CCP [D GS NO NOBS MA I.IN LOST Cir.•DISTANCE MK= ` .PPS •a/_.•L[}S9�eFL.-s•�'S 12 SOREO,TAL IN TEN MUM.Or TAAVTL.NOR 1 VLtiCAL I � . ` T• - „O SO,B e.13.0NrAL TRASS..TO so ozatcriw or 1LVU.. JP% o 9. LtuaaNATiw slum et nano.au.0 TEN...sins s. LK.NT..TUT ACCESS..ROUTE Or Tuvf:SIM NAVE ROL.Or TEAM. NITSL INSLSITT Cr Nor LESS TEM 1 �' ? ,f"' OII `4• /��• .O �G< ."°�LANDINGS T TUT TOr AND BCr1.AND AT LUST we ROT CANDLE Ar GRADE LEM. -•' fg � R a- , I'IA�� a �. - 1 [NLDl®:An LASDirc sxuL eE vRORDm M eAm ia-er N12 .,♦ % . 1 e: O �.- ,.E p �. a 10. � c uSC. TOP LANDINGS AND xNrLN®uTz[Awlaa:5 SMALL tlav[ 10. C.PASSING y,a SHALL s[rsWiom M TANGS Iwv• t Ej• 1.::� � .� �t' _ 'fakes ' 0 ` THE Oi+mgiw NrASGEm v NNE PMOTION1.0.Dr RAM M Or NOT •; /•N/ \ '-'LEITZKE-::�, ,"•TNAS f•. NN6n T.vArD CNSA,On DIRECT[w Ar A 114 C' L1 .:N. '. r n '.T'(• LA.0,00 TEN LANDING se•m.tear Br It.THAN 9•E!'. 11. 1f¢PAPAL.MUM.M ADAPTABLE oNM..WITS . �yem •. f• .-_ - i[�. � ARCHITECTES LANDINGS AT THE MI=Or SANDS SHALL NAVE A DINpRx :MALL 9E MCAT=SOUS TEAT T.KO=I•LS ROI:e Cr _ °' ° 'Off 16 DIENOTiw or SUD PM or NOT LESS mom A•. WEBS vQ,FRO,TIM MAIM SPACE OM NOT rscain SOS ' :oJ,:'ii �'+ '� a SANDS ARE ATIN. S A ANC.THE OSLOPE SADtoS 1 LION BE O9in:+,c A vnILyTAr MAWAY. ••�•. �E,P! `�0 ",^,. T•Y - .�,� (y '!r. 1'-. /� :O .. • NA w U D .MSS RA C.WK NS I SLOPES AU.S:MIN Lu. ! - _ • MITT CAL TDiD Nw[wr 6:Ner SNAIL NAVE eurruu As 12. rARCIw sRm S.W.SS me xn a run PrtL TEN TOTAL w!i Hwy ;ja• �= � ' _ L= -t ( _-.-:. 0 maim rot 0rrattr S. TN:R SNAI WAVE NA :L aI-i 01}i•. AS ACCESS AI sLE Nile A sinning TIDie Cr e' yyNe _ 4a, n• v[Lf AS M.P.IN SECTION l0U-.... .�•is[OCITm ammo.SX[T9 sr... O•Lipo� 7 ��b 1 n� VP • 1'Q •> l0• IEWLRm. NOT et ACCESS AISLE SHALL Se NA.D TT AB I1I�PILL : aNi C' �/I/ ` [-••• _ �Jf. ' '''se CO:"�y,. TUT INTERNATIONAL ST:DOL Or ACCTLE Si•:BE r!PTmm IN Nor![OSm AS A SPAR. __ Le neiastw LOCATIONS: u. PASSZNc:rats:AND ACCESS us'••suet NAVE A scan NOT I �-., - `b�-; e+ ��" c 1' TO ascsm 1 ES AN. •n[wAEr MLIC SITE pRRUTEs.ACCESS ISLE IAL:NG _ _g-" _ I' '�O, TOIL.ACUITIES=1003. UIRN.=.CES nmis MTS. s9. VENTPASSIMMN SPACE ASNALLBC.BE.rrsTM Er zr• q '4 •.• r O/ 1a `s` _ m MN s_}•ABC.DACE Ar TUT Ne,PD Cror _ . ��`�r.•• I .. fir' E-n a. ♦ ',ti w.. SR.••CONN[L-r LEDGES runic EEwIRL P...SPA.. S.siw SZALL n MANED.III 3'.�.. �p N.,.j. _ IE • ,r1 S- A......Ramos or LA TNT SNT..IONAL STROM Or KOS.AND OG,Le SASE INS SITE MEANS=TO mitoses!PUBLIC WILD..ENTLY,CTS ANG NpRyS I• d E AGO.3ri.St.PAC MMUS. Dr !AMINO roo¢T EEwiEm. ` y�; ° 'A • '© ♦ \ S,•S t S. Nun.....RAVE A Sion xN THE marmot w TuvsL Nor ;sal •t;.r_s.,_Net 5-Bat a¢;LA. !■rE�i■F • ',�p a 'W Y .V d "" ti �� nD•E VAN:IN Al AND A CROSS smPE Or Nor MS/TON 1 `PD ALL Jro}eN.'rN �tEBn � `'YA _ 0 ' •► �• 0mrN, �O'dS no,B. .001a THE on or A rum R®1:NO IT - N' • ~� E J 4 - �, Oat Sr(i-Rc�<Tr,¢cMww O' . swam BE YIRm AS A SANG. - - 1sw -' • L -I [ .� • }i E- - _ ^9 •.vNe. O vO-sal......... • : - v�__y �•> m'. ,_ rsaT� \,"--el,111 �I p �1� • �<v -_220.125.4.0 b JS eS _—_ e I •c'I 1- T :s>-o( .� •�•G�TOL■yPAi-v2.•rNtL I �• _ b C ` Nr.:w "J�--- j. =rou:� - J p "'r ...s-,. ,: �.- G(:I I`"�.-:.1-.Z. "") p •"® . - - r•:. -•e^ i� T I `y'• -' �I: ,'I,. • `_, w ; • Csierio • n. I I+-a4 ••" _ ;C ' )i ! \ .` ♦• -sre•er LIF41[u• R .+r, ••I•N r' ••+ - w ... I. 9. �.. L ► •+see) a-SN sATv.u) �,(`poi\�- aq�.;is?.d: ■.I• o�,�C,.. '-.i� __;� •A� V• J _ f. sue' 'ram}} '�`"� <�_.r Sr¢[L • > l7 !' �► 'a"f!3" s�i:fr�= u`9f�v.' 5'y've .:'be�"a .�:.'�'Es.�:r er.�¢. e�.�' �',.r v. LEGS`' L p �:ti �.w�:'tis 0_:.r emmmamme I I.��`d• 3 re a a`y� ` ,�O. d I ���.1 '' ■■ ��jur pp�gj��•1i �e " �' 27Qz er �L� •;•�� .�r_, Ey'� D#a ®• , 'I,i ....I •_% F0 _L.. ... 0.,--3 +:� _ _y.-.,.�-r••Vo I I - a ':u I rw 'A ••o .. • i o -rai•IG �. �1�- fCw.�r�`�., i�1 f�'— i :1.0�.� ,� 9 ~' 'r�i: E .-.��r�.�,.- OY � w I0. '--S 3.; C�:Ir, �''��f i j o• I •F7,41.•�� ram::. ' * _ :_i `;i�,�Na .' %eal '-^�. !'^..1 - ■ .11 alp p2.- p?s -2 6 — l :.. C��_-,4_:�;5�" 1 • a1_�o°A•Nr,'M4 ,i6:5 -' �� riff r7-to � •'1'i✓ �PJC:'1'II� 5� a --� �s-+`__v .cl t: I J fi .I .. •1., y.,,� E�� r��i ♦ �,' r o;. �.0 �- p xi:' ems' jD `� a -sl .color__,- .;(ill& 4'7 i oil " N'' ° :I t�I S ' �� - eta r•c.,•al 1� j' .. ? s` -;,.,,-1— !`� a -, t-rj 'L .D^'_- ♦ tii '� s Q�;: ... ■Ir. '• O I 1 ►.�?`O .• I ,I • •• II -..I' .� - v d� a- ``�.ry l' y t •vr``7�..1y L.:_ e I °e Pe.k � . ? ;a a71' �e ; a-7 �.. " DUI': F'w�A: -NBC �arAzo - ��'off 't,�r►,Al o �es:��.�a •N+1� ,_= _ • m�+1• •;,I):P .c1.}: {� .•�-.i.,, Y9 �.t p - a. ��Sj} i�'j a-�fl' -�,v tom, -O i�•a1 . ^° - — ■• �F�1 `'� i O'' am at, (Itl/I `� Qa`��•.:•►� .1 ' -o --0--1 °�J I .^I 9 M ► S;• ,ale .'-or,D°a'Ia;tri A �earC: ' leL6'� I L-�i7LQg'I i 04,,,. �.j ,Sti y�j` a ° ��,arOloc:, '` \� �l,.o' ^ `� t . �-_TT"'' :� uAmieOti•�;� cY!\�'9 '"� 1■4 ''� Gi -�• r° p�" •n©-"'v' 6/ r"� ° 6 �'•--6"•••1 (:.►PVT_ .` ."� ,S O G � �_��aL � i iAi� ' Q �Ii fiao� 5' I '� ° ��.q06air �srIgr•�Yoe - o • ab I ' - - 1 - = -:� =waia:- - -- : Q"! 1 `�r'i.y,''^'°7 ? :' �% —• - gip 9 E.w.,s9_— /� F \ii I I sb" ':7 'Ave. •e, O O I I I �� �1r' �7!\ I.a.�E i�o o,.�, • _ Izl'-oe^ of on I I I II � � '' I\ I 1 :re=!..,ra a gie.ol•'+i_.:-=�e'�`�5-er O �— _— -- Iiati-\ I I loll •'SNS.m.v. !GI.O° \ `u od ale'•a' SKb.a' Ptoro,•v 'I II s'viDc va+•sD aoao • l- •xld.srA...•IA I ! 1 /Lo-.Nsw away Acme» . ." Is So'sLo•C eAswC. . - 70'¢/v NIEx'rNDw,rev �'�l••+• ON-IL IAA, (Te...s(GS,alro-.s..er j e n.alr(c} te.+T.,( Al !u_.2SS SS O/ T/'iiz) "(t1 rq �,I, La•`:.nTN A© }® -e •t ei`-,`a J I O 'J `® .0 -`--y�;— -6 • SITE PLAN .: • • 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN r '' A'•,�N`�SCC• l� Palma.Amory-Tamarack,M pemm.mmASC/ Ntii ';'rPtfpt ASS A-•-ARID_.=p eL•..ss,m rf10f I}OE}}SYO,U •..r I a ste MM.rya rams. _ '2 PoLnC ,Sna.c -p Nm.S.'ylry SDTti .. 1. ROOS noon.FOR ACMS LT TILL PRTLICAILT DANDICA))m T. VA+•• WIPE AM CORD CITA SHALL Mal DC IMxaROPIID er •'gyp�I T. __ ____--L' / xiar'r• - SMLL HAVE A MTM[MOM CLSAR w10m Or POT LETS TNAM•• M..coupon IM LLVM Qum.THAN I.. _u. Y. .-\ e'nL.4M2 .'I'I:MO¢S. D. R[TMIM AM ACCaSail W._or TRAM GRAMS SHALL MLI uA»-t+Art• 'l VV '•1. SLOPS Or MIOS S..•.•POT M sxzva TRAP 1 PA[T[CAt TO OP...Mo PARE WAR I.SN LUST OMR DISTANCE MD.. I ___ __ .-kj.._( I ! 11 ItlRItDIITAL xM zM nxRlCSiaM a TRAM.P.I VERTICAL SOLID PARTS. _ igi�. y + t ••3:�v.' / J?E �4 m•>ILDAIroITAL TRANIRaII TO TO nxRSLTsa v TRAM. : I !�Li J •P. manc ocroo outs ex nano=AIAl16 tM Aeosstel[ / �1 IA Q.&'• ti L. P.M.Rn16M la MILLSD=ROUTE W TMRa LRAM Mn ROM DI TRAM,VI..A xMIdSITT Or Mal Las TS.1 '-, e• ) `}Fn \ • LAX..AT SRI TOP A.lOTTOa A.AS LASS CM roof C.D.AT GLADE LAM. / J ' IMILa®IAIT LAMDI.LRAM PI PLOVIM2 r0 MCe 20•M 3 •�1� l,i u< • THE n' I RIM nI�mTOP a L�a a IM I M� le- Aer sm.M P.M.roo MAl AM>TALLI m 11111....r ;j` ; LEITZKE L.S THAN V. MRS Ta MO aaN6a DI..20.AT A ,I . �• L. S TIT COI WW OSE u OP POT n ODY S61. AI 11• .Pt.M P /VACS P MOIL ROE iI ` I /•u I MIDI.TIO MIDI.MALL POT LIDS AIMS _ ARCHITECTS M Iq� DV[MID M A AK.ffi IPSIDI MD[OS.....a plMn6 A MID..ROAPIAT. St / ■ 2 nl pa uMTa..mI calve Mn ceva MOW MP 1 \ ' — �� ) I•._` i/ :' CAL TO 10 na¢rarlu T.T LRAM MR[MNDLuss M 11. P.O.SP..=a•••III L0.2.IP PAIN VI=TM TOTAL 0 r ��_ 11{ Oft 1Lm aaa LZAIRVAn aavz TMr xMTm�sazr nna or xl•. AN Ac[ta usu Vin A unsMw nvn or �l ; , . • se• (`a. '- '11131 ^ tv1'O` Jyo • �L M R[DuiRm!r]ILTSDI IIDu.....mS M •>-xs IL7CATf a[TNmI Q TRD SIAC)S. DOIOIDARIa W h , ` n - ^ SE $ • T.AGCLSi AISLE MO M MM.LC MS AI.I..RILL - • R 'j Tl lu sxlo:Q.a ALms s-...M sewsxl sR Nor u DM M A SPA.. :' L• ' (S>(Ir '-.1 fiT- z'+. / g • _ TfR' LOW... II. >AASIAL SPACES AND access anus snAii M.A LLD.Pal - I ''�� •F /A rY' �� • TO LS..1 IS•l. /FLIRT SZTFAIaAR65,AOT$Iei.L)AMIII6 I '� �C ' �i..c' L mc..Mpr Rm i MM.VIM.DIPG Mn+.a.ALTaIau' u. LD w-Aa II Iaa AT MIm�LOOu� _ 1 'wl�� `x� \ 1 '.` CO!jy V�o ERVAL na wrsTO CV 0*3W P LRAM 01*31*P.O.NDLIC STAI)AMR[MOLSs-roz l Aeoms Aia) uLL LOAM TTR -• ' •- ittil".1:L7 1_3 , _8 ;sL'ITO C1Lm PW.tC IOILMP6.TRARm AND arAn D[M•[ID PAR[IM6 PM)tii IRpDiLC. n �- I • �RI.L Sin MC1LITIM. I i Z• f. Y lust MV[A soon[/TM D[RLLTIC.OI 1MV6 DDT le. - W.I. 1.PLP�s^S'-C.eQOl1ND AEI.11Y06LARI TTERAIMM 1 SP•l aMD A dt6f 610P[MOr®loM xw 1 I r l I 0 • :mulb Riuss�ism Al iwa,Au 3 1P u _ i - I r' II _ L�1`' EEC 6 LO EFS I¢EMA.w --- l .... `\� �. l d 13 zol•xE 1,enxi-.a.0 v+tw.L _ 'l ?"tas7w 10/' .1 `^^�1���7 1Ji•J 'lain;. tLb sOJRs - 1CG-c ,1 1SD=0 J 7--0 1 , p - "•AiX j lyI. ' I wf O GASGbO e fV CJR0,41RL I Al. rWvic DUN A.ay. I l i `�. ,` i Sraatr LRNr..*Er,.I Sro) .a-Cl5. IG.ArgxS) . Avla.M�.`t Moe AS'Ery tl..y'vprAVT RblllaH - SbYx.4rbo- ../ • �.,. • Iu l /s'`. •1 i•iiiiiir— ;,4._..1._,..,„.. T Cirri .Mm'v'n llsl z+L ALc. b. i '...N.\I::'1 I - "7 . 4' 7, 1 : • . i• : • .•-• I• , ; ! I 1 idir .. 4Orril 1 t' . 14 ...-- -.1.. \ INh N.PriliPlir • ,;:tmet., in .,177t., _ 1 al _ �� a • 5111' �"" rillv.,...4.1,;/ �.'i� . . , ��. p r:-7 . ;i C-ri. ,,7i �..• rr..e j. 1.5 EAM.EJT bt `T IA ■ r.L • l y Li-_!J .1 - • 1 S c11Lx C.x r..Av.^r ..wlss5.art MT • r / ;:- . v� e ti.i-A.aRT+ 'a m„o ^ a A� �.�_ ,a•1unurl�\ t.o, . i - • •: a>+ cwca•I.d.s•da; bo'.Id= I; y I _F - D ,�e D_ • I ••i �Il 1 • I �, � •• c I ''• �� !TI_- ! I I 1 ( ri ;v�ai .��6 ty Inaikiiiii • '♦ ir • 1 0 •.fry ' 'L'lalleL+i.'d ilw-°•l+n' fi...1::7;:l' • i °I�rw.;/, I YIQ ... J sP . .1 -----). ., .r—i--E-g 7 .... 1.-,a.et _ _. _. ., .,...,. E _DU-- Ll o I v� '� n _er..�LI I'I _:.L• ' . 1; , `I`l I I ir'a / ► �a _ p :r s • 5s 4 tll� dQ-•IC'-JJ Av Eiii4 .I ML 1. - -1b d� p�sL_q I I � ± • _ c �. fir, -. _-__�— I .L: —�T•I."----r._%... e..T' -_ �-Ii0 0 `� � •h4-'' •.p 7 -L� ._._7.7-GP._I.._�'_ _-_._._E•_L - .. .. _-• • II F I I P? nao�/� ? emu. "va t'/eDAe i \ �Oe.ww..• , i '�• I 1S. !'l aD'ati.IiTi'9Rourev 1• M t, • I "c4Zo .t,,EP.L.a Nc7 l....1."�i L /D'.x.-S Drsn..e.., IT`(6 LG.-Wool �N f.a,.LL t ;I A`C•I 56t L.RIL C (Tea NSZCO.OITONS,.LT b7l+G L 1io :R ,,w"Qeo 15 0•a/OTq.) • • it • • SITE PLAN Il•b'al • R9 • v�aG ,_, ~O4n d' cu U 2 r i Is. I-w= ' ® T',,,� ¢ or0 4DIb MOTS. -l9-5 -a-. 3. iA1 D.TCARL rAC.T3TT Sv.••l'aO01D1 io T1R C I 1 4-GI.h 2.51." S'-cL ieLl' c'_OA 4 _I.GI' SLIM COr 1.T[Or..dr SC MD ` 5' 1 IiI-`II F •IBC oLay=A T I SASSIPOLW 1.11112.1.02 COD"Alm LOCAL AND - a MLA Eu 1(i>La Cw.-J'cuH -•,' h. 8TA][81R1DL1°1111D!IL[CN.. Q� • cov..„PM RUM PLUS.OR 0.12RWIAL M 'IL- .- M.MAITE[ISLA TO M.P.. i cb.t°. 1-i.. - m Art-x S p .4 j aa•. ,I t._9 1. a0:„m 217.11.111,ma m M.D. N __- aOWO•'ge6r.'>�Q-. s-.°a¢-+-- - r4M Par .t-v s l^_ II 'o•• -r c n.x-o. a-.c MCI..null.u Muau+fa Is a wzllut or rn 1 y� 6uD.e Ts.w..� -- 4.4 cast e T_ _ _ : I-- ? c.lD arm a oO T 4.w ucG. ? ' .•1O _ \ 1 ♦ t rivso a.0 a¢Ian MY.TO A WISP R all C] Gp , c...,,... :Po.yt aslC Y7c 9 TOOtIUM1 POT TO QC[ta 110.- MS MT u 7 O _ i I�•DaT �," •♦ `TFs S¢-�\•,• •\\ ' • / i /: �wL cewu:a' DIADS� e. ...LIL®TARDY.I+¢Du Or MI=uutD ` �a'' I _ . W TIIR US.a r.OQ'I MICR MT St e -iMI ! r !wN �e GLIq I L ALJ„in SO 116 DS'SED St1OORVK. III; D_ .•. '. S .,. • - a.R�iD. i; \0 ST`.»;�+T / I. . ,WiO�LLTreµiX r•O°i.e.. •6.Tre S.eu DLSns.nrdras:TT MALL u hi MST 15 �� _O = �- I/ SA;r veNT:LAT.O.l MYST> I[wn TL.:SS .T f0.r.IIoa6 AID AR...Dan p W • 1���1 x yr., GaVL C.A.=T3 TW C.••.0.4.SIDDS.MS AND I•-- J - It Q> A tY1W� °1 \ .... t>. <.4r �!Lo. a _\y. I N FOOD C.D.S. Q ARMS r1IQ®.4 K l0 I: . 1-.. y.'J.t,, `r i E 1'✓ o-..ace. S ��----11▪ Yn C 1 h A. SR TT.DPIPRIP] ...A St T .:i I!I,.. . P2:SLGOL = Gi ,iJ_-1PiPos=_>w _ T:DEc;D42-�.� GG `9 • ;�Tm::.w.. =RAK a j�19 .A¢DG- = / t•�� F f :;aL.l- ..>e a c.DunL c.wG- 31 N �,•rTtl[xIMMO,DQIJ T.WM..L SILL St Q O2 al O IJ. v^ r ,.J �.1"Ir7 heTL:S co<ec.L v/T-1e - B. A.L OM.LOOP M.O.MTtm AMU St S11Q �. 1__ - ` O..C�sL•wb�J.�.. 1^` _f :° tli'THAT R CUSS.. ..- I TK o00 rL011 T. D _o I.w. I��•. ')I �\1-1�-/ P T Q 1 S. M..7.2.C.V..A..forQvl [Mt ' 03 .d AGM S011 OYLL I[IYR13lm. O V� i 4 DR.CIOAS SW.It MT.=10 LOMILOSS Alm n a I ......... J �' ' Y ,,...GV.00 .1 • n.LL CLAW.A M. QAT DC:ACIWS SM.' J gel w 3 I,: I �� r I a tRTsuc v TK...APICAL ACM.KIT.. A'1 '4 I aL.il.R.a u•-,.CA... , C TD:.L- ' wr' j- .NL TK VGK 14.1. LL �� Cy'`: -r u I IL _ �j-t 1 ,'Lt»{ \-O: -`. I --- ¢ Q% awl v..n V L-=. ; .• p . 1 1L. E WC t11W.i ITIL...A K M.D.AS iN -n 'y c.` c o_e I- _ • ' I -- I� ..:ll - ax-�� !:i.. n nrt CY MaswL.••] M.ct c-IIRD 1 (� Y 14-1.,�1 7._a j L:2�:5.f AL--.I>•S.CY. ..,...1 i.:'__.Imo. ..i.....�y_.,._.-�. �.--7..-Ib-+.:`GaZ\v ui_- •I . T CE 1T7 r 1' -- -_ _ 1• ./I ? ¢f.• II.PtOr:OG LawD N6>IIIWN R•.n ODDLTYILSWLtO�(o� I(j�. • 1 I G¢-Sow .!L'.L Y i ^.'I a',' -;• -\I i` I v.'1) Cj�`,•1 A� 1 L.� :D� I RMLLme L.,u-T.N(a newri./VMS1. V / I C, ..:.J 1 V T L'' IELL _, u ° .:.ya;IN°° 'IJ n \a . J "� } L.TChT GITTIONa• F ��.�o' Z P.. ♦ _ ;1. a • �_Ii"�s \ v¢ .w ._.1D.r,u» zoo _IDCsrT STOo L'1 {i•. -..p�_EZ _ ! ✓/ � / \ , 1_�I I ;\: s..:. _- `_•/� -2�5,;-OC.- -.. {. �'owo FG>M 4'�aTS T_ s� 1 \ I / ern-.I :JK7C C•il0=O G C1L'� 2 •4 T_ , _aL - YI '.1 I 61s \ - ._L_ e ,� 6244,,42.4. 11 O.4IT4..R.O./IDC 2.4 o - ' -♦-v`i.-1 .'...Y p�I ii I 'i.., �� 0 V.6i y„ \ o S I TGXSL D 4r1 JTJP i ` I I • -� � Laaa1 =r1 I _r = I "' ip- •-.x...-V` v for° ----- IC"" ". �T '1 ° °Is. �� y.,v 1 \C N r � - I / �s�-S ink• _ .G= „I - z '9 `' a� , 0 .2 a3 I �1`.. . ...__.- ,• r i r am`_ � a _.. I = i • . . , Ir 1 .-T 1- Dt -N Rit 3 aoc.. .wy>'eJ4 e_ ♦ 1S .4_ .!. I` 4 \ a I ¢ i L Si 4=L.Cti°'gib= ~-� •�� - A y f.-.:r .: v.c-. __] \ I. ♦ i d ° G ^�ryw y.� L]-4..[.Ea.Da I _�• ♦° ``___-.� 1_1c q.._•j- ___ IIDIS. r -0 °*--,3.4cn]o+-t.�-D .....-v.° +--�•L-fib,, f4° 9I I �••�c v.-ma sum CAMINO IP ACCIMA CI PITA SECTION 1I01 o s Q jI \ - a-• TMU.S.C.MO IS Mt FOLLOW.LOO.TLONS: ✓ ` _ o.%-I 4 i l 1. NSIF III MOILS AND TASOS LOWS • ; 1 ,xb °K a�I _ I. IA..IN IPORMS [GAOLS LOOKS e�lY i0;0 Lpw L, I 4-T 9•-•hL I aja 9 .3'.y 1. OIMOIS IN Ran AND SLIDI.MMUS Of SLID..... Q Z. . 17:4 I G.DJ SND T[wrO�91 '� 12� ��1 I 3A.I� 1 IP.L SUI.1.4 AND PITMP T.M. FL.I.OAS 1 1 IV it VS-..Tt�»z.a aa• .4.i Or TA[LOORI.DO.PPOSt G•IPTA CMS=POLITIC vsarical.mac S MID.0. T ° I 6'-�O• b cw eas.::aOR PAZAI. arus TAM 1G MCP.MO.TK nom d _, P.I.:44 a l.L GwD TIL;/•H .. oU.ZIPO III R[ED rANi1i COWER IMP Soot[COMAS R ¢ v.h 1 ` b D..t���` ITM PO f WM.PA.A cu3n AMA IP QQK OF S 1 R..rt.APO TM LOPFST.DO[IS LASS TM.1a 6-0 SPCA.ADD.TM FINISHED FLOOR arm,ORYALU. 'A • AWACS lITA1N 11 MOMS Or SOOT LGSIW. I II ISW IL SIL - Or SMITS OGLING .01 Lein MM.MT az rbRQED nix A W.I...P.M Pr LW..li MOM IN SOD.. .LOCATED 1Rv[O IS AND of IMI € FLOOR- FLAN / ZO O F =x-4 M I N_6 1..-4 N t5LI I-t9u_IC., X :Pow• :a PALMS 1D.F.Q. t :-.VT_Z10a- DE11.211.1CI, W41.1- ® .iL l D lis -DR O1 • (f &AM..L.4 T.,..• ...-2...19‘...P..C.IICAL 50.14 Ai 4 A 2..,,,,, , -- •e•1:4_C..5.1.0.:V . i— .. . —— ^ to'2°FLAL11.1.2. 1 4.12 illinisil 1,, - t a:1',- • '_..(/ --- .3 1 (....- -.::1,1) = •C., .... .- 2..e.C.a. b...40...&&•••••0&&.&... sy".A.N.VE.14-7- .1: liF-'-'" 'Oen,lk..1.....Ctn... S I vs NT-mwra.L. I ,:... rx_ &PIV. -. 14 -.-' .---2 i• .... ...'-......... 0,&0.,, 10. 41 • ........••— -= --?, — ,_.___.,,-- b11 1 1 _____ TOE-=---==--;=-1111 1 1 i I i II EL) CI BOW 2'4 D._,/ m.....m. ..m......-. ....- 1MM 1 w <1 _ 7— gi T 1: _.-----15.11 1 T IMI I--J .7;1 T In I r IM;r71.7: = ,— El - ,._, 1111111111 , _____ --al-- ,-,....-- ;, .r..... C.F1-001c. L,KG IU: . Q. ::,..,, ..:.... 2.•0>a(....s?/....mor...e. E._..6.=••.so.,:,...,., • .• ., 5 0 L.r-i-Li L_E.VAT I 0 1,-1 NOZ-TI-i r.--...LIF-V4.7-10N " E - .- 1 30.1....0.2.r -....... . 1 'W #1.1 -' 0 : -3 4i..! • . EL :I LT 11. _ 2.e•L V11.--/.0:6.1,06- __ .. _ , -_ - _______ z 2 •2 1 ,- 11 ' i'if 1 a,. --..-- ' _0 -1 —IIIIIITIFT1 — L. '.3 _.,_ i - 1= T ; t- --„11/•.,A,......1 -_-_-- _4: - n -,.•,--.., .:;,_. • . _ ._ ..__ "I ,.... 4 - •z • 1 ----(:- s D.O.D. J \-_-.7.4ves, ..... ow. ' i .,..,t, z..4,p...... .4.4 Z.c.0.0.•TILT, . 2 021 •..12,..... ga.......m.....- =":A 57 EL L V AT.I0 r'...i • . 1:71; ? 2i . •. r. ...i- • . ...."...wa VE., 0.e.r&-• . C .02/0v.P11-24 44.40-L. 1-,-I'r .........".L_EA• --) Mr--01,&.10.00....6 LINN&•,_.- 0 4) lb....vE.:•r-0.--L--A- waa& 1.0.P Is&l...L.C.COLL I- . _ 4-.4,12F.FIC.S-C LI 4, to4"7,-D-'1'4,- .9•;;1'6"4---------1-_ — _. . ___ •-.1.1.6147. til 9... ti 1- 11T II T I1111 --- .:1 I II.-I I •...1 4.4.- 46 .1.... i [ 111= 11 ! f------- T li T If I. l 0 44 0> ' -'-'-4 _ =. ----1 T In L _I T II T 1 r---irti 0 III FLIL.I.eyst-. , — -------.--.. 2P412. ir -wEls-r F-Lav4.-rioH ...-,..,.-4.......,..-ry!... V4'a.C-0- Dill ' • • . ._....... • _ ...,..,- . • ._ . . _ • - 1 • . •I .. • - ..... . .. . • May 26, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: j THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS (Windsor Place Apartments) File No.: R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 • LOCATION: 4300 Block of N.E. 4th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 2.9 acres from G-1 to R-3; site plan approval for a 202 unit multi-family complex on 11.4 acres and conditional use approval for a daycare facility on the site for use by residents of the complex. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: . Approval with conditions. • Hearing Examiner Decision: Recommends approval of Rezone request by City Council. The Site Plan and ConditionalUse requests are approved, with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was received DEPARTMENT REPORT: by the Examiner on May 5, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 12, •1987 at 9:10 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: . Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan • • Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan • • • Exhibit #4 - Vicinity Map •• Exhibit #5 - Elevations of structures Exhibit #6 - Elevations of Daycare Center • Exhibit #7 - Revised Site Plan Exhibit #8 - Tract Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson. After identifying the property on the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Maps Mr. Erickson continued with a review of the criteria to be considered for a rezone stating the site is expected to increase the population of the area by 625 residents; a daycare facility is to be located on the site for use only by residents of the project; property to the west of the site has been rezoned to R-3 which is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods; 8.5 acres on the site are already zoned R-3 with the remaining 2.9 acres currently zoned G-1. Staff does not feel the 2.9 acres would be compatible with office or business usage on the site and recommend•R-3 zoning for this portion of the site also. Reviewing the site plan request, Mr. Erickson reviewed the criteria to be considered noting the 8.5 acre portion of the site complies with all land use regulations, but if the 2.9 acre portion is not approved for a rezone it will be excluded from consideration in this request; the development should have a positive impact on surrounding property values; pedestrian pathways should provide safety along with the extension of other sidewalks in the area by the applicant; light and air provisions will be accomplished ;a': with the placement of buildings within 50 ft. of one another; recreational facilities are to be provided, !i HE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS • • IZ-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 • May 26, 1987 • Page 2 with the sport court being moved into the area near the recreation building so the walls of the building can be used as a noise buffer. Mr. Erickson stated the O-P zone could be compatible with the R-3 zone given its park-like setting; the applicant will try to preserve vegetation currently on the site; and feels there should be cooperation with Metro for transit service to the area due to the projected population of the development. The Examiner queried the zoning and contents of properties around the area south of the site and it was pointed out there is a large Safeway tore and undeveloped B-1 property to the south and west of the applicant's property. There is a setback of approximately 26 ft. between the apartments on the dogleg of the site and the business zoning to the south, and a setback of approximately 70 ft. from 4th Street; access to the site is off 136th (King County). Mr. Erickson continued with the information on the conditional use request stating the daycare facility request complies with the required criteria; is compatible with the surrounding facilitie§; the daycare center is not intended to be open to the general public but it was noted at some time in tine future it is possible there maybe a need for daycare business to come from outside due to future turnover of families with/without children - but that is not its intended use at this time. The Examiner asked that staff address a proposed condition to ensure the daycare is used only by residents of the project to avoid it becoming a commercial endeavor with people driving up early in the morning to drop off children wl:ich would be disturbing to residents of the units. Mr. Erickson advised traffic is of concern particularly if the daycare center should draw customers from outside the area, and will remain a concern until 136th Avenue as it is now shown, is widened. One-half of the street is scheduled for development by the applicant; adequate landscaping conditions have been met; and staff recommends the Examiner consider a condition of approval for the daycare center that would preclude patronage from families outside the proposed complex due to potential traffic impacts. It was recommended the Conditional Use Permit be approved subject to the conditions of the ERC and any others deemed necessary by the Examiner: The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this application by the applicant or their representative. Responding was Steve Leitzke. 19518 Pacific Highway South. Seattle, Wa. 98188. Exhibits 7 and 8 were presented incorporating all of staff recommendations on page 8 of the report; he stated the owners of the property have put.forth a plan for a family oriented project of 1, 2, and 3- bedroom units, to be contained in 23 buildings, which they anticipate will be the impetus for filling the proposed daycare center. The daycare center is limited by State law to a maximum of 60 children. Mr. Leitzke stated if need be they would phase the project in order to begin construction as soon as possible on the already zoned R-3 portion. Phase 2 would be the 2.9 acres now seeking R-3 zoning. Phase one would include the improvements to NE 5th Street and the recreation center. He stated when the proposal originally came to the city it was felt the project would be under-serviced with roads and utilities, and as a condition of site plan approval the applicant was required to extend road improvements for NE 5th Street and the owner at that time decided to purchase the 2.9 acres now requested to be rezoned. Mr. Leitzke stated approximately 90% of Phase 2 of the project consists of the 3 bedroom units to the north and west of the project. The Examiner asked for the timing of the phases and Mr. Leitzke stated the applicant would build the entire project at the same time - the phasing is merely an instrument in the event the rezone request is not approved, they are not looking for any specific time limit. He pointed out that on the new plans Building E has been split, as suggested by staff, to enable the walkways to be extended into the area of the recreation building. He stated there is a topography problem as there is a difference between the parking lot surface and the road surface of 136th Street and they are working with engineering to try • to determine how to proceed with that intersection; they are working on a right-hand turn lane on N.E. 4th which will encroach somewhat into the.intersection. These are engineering problems the applicant is working on with the city and feel confident can be worked out to a mutual satisfaction. The Examiner expressed his concern regarding the visibility and noise factor interface between the applicant's R-3 zoning and the western B-1 zoning containing Safeway-Store's rear wall delivery area and any new B-1 that may be developed to the south and west of the site. The Examiner stated some of the applicant's buildings are quite close to the western property line, and although 20 ft. seems adequate for a setback, early morning or evening hour deliveries may create unwanted noise and/or sight problems for residents of this proposal. Mr. Leitzke stated he felt the building setbacks and landscaping in those areas could be increased to create a solid screen to alleviate those impacts. He pointed out that setbacks on buildings N and 0 are 25 ft. and the setback on building G is approximately 30 ft., both of which are in excess of the setback requirements of 12 ft. He had no further testimony. • The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M. `' FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: • Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: • _. 'CHE LEITZKE ARCI;IITECTS • R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 • Page 3 FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, The Leitzke Architects, filed a request for approval of: 1) a Rezone of approximately 2.9 acres from G-1 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - , 35,000 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family); 2) a Site Plan approval for 202 units over 11.4 acres; and 3) a Conditional Use Permit to allow a daycare center in the R-3 zone. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (pNS) for the subject proposal. 4. • The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the Borth side of the 4300 block of N.E. 4th Street, between Union Avenue N.E. on the west and Duvall Avenue N.E. on the east. 6. Access to the site is proposed from N.E. 5th Street which intersects the site from the west and Ti proposed to traverse the site west to east. Access would also be provided from Bremerton Avenue N.E. (which is the Renton designation of 136th Avenue S.E.) just east of the site. A series of driveways would provide access along these two public streets. There would be no direct access to N.E. 4th Street. 7. The subject site was annexed into thet City with the adoption of Ordinance 2290, enacted in November, 1966. Part of the site was rezoned from its initial G-1 (General; Single Family ..4Residential) to its current R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family) with the adoption of Ordinance 2482, enacted in May, 1969. The approximately 2.9 acres subject to the current rezone request retain their original G zoning. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Office/Office Park, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. Development patterns surrounding the subject site vary. North and east of the subject site undeveloped land and single family uses predominate. South of the site single family homes and commercial uses predominate. Multiple family uses and commercial uses are located west of the site. 10. A single family home and accessory buildings are currently located on the subject site. These structures would be removed if the subject proposal is approved. 11. The subject site consists generally of gently rolling terrain, although steeper sections occur as the site gains approximately 20 feet from the south to the north. The applicant proposes to maintain the topographical relief while modifying it somewhat to provide level building pads, parking areas, on-site storm drainage retention ponds and the necessary roads and driveways. 12. The applicant proposes 202 dwelling units contained within 23 buildings. The units will contain one, two and three bedroom units. The complex will also contain a recreation building, sports court and swimming pool.' 13. The portion of the subject site which is the subject of the 'rezone request is located immediately west of the R-3 zoned parcel (see map) approximately three quarters of the distance from south to north, along the west property line. 14. A wide mix of zoning districts surround the subject site; Directly north is an R-3 district, while large G-1 districts are located both east and west of the site.. A small R-3 district is located west of the section of the subject site proposed for R-3 zoning. The B-1 (Business/Commercial) district located at the intersection of Union and 4th is located west of the site. An O-P district is located south of the site across 4th. 15. Parking for the complex will be provided in a series of lots adjacent to the buildings. The total complement of parking will be 354 spaces or 1.75 stalls per unit. 202 stalls, or one per unit will be covered parking. 16. The complex has been designed so that opposing buildings, will not be closer than 50 feet from each other. In other words, the windows of units will be separated by at least 50 linear feet. End wall units would be closer, but still not closer than approximately 20 feet from each other. 17. Pathways in most cases would provide pedestrian corridors separated from parking lots and driveways to assure pedestrian safety within the complex. • • • 'THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 4 18. The pattern of the western property line forms an inverted 'L' around the B-1 zone which contains the Safeway Complex on the northeast corner of Union and 4th. This Office pointed out the particularly unaesthetic (atrocious may correctly characterize it) juxtaposition of the Safeway rear wall and delivery bays with the front yards of its neighboring apartment complex. The similar configuration of lot lines in the instant case could create a similar situation if landscaping or fencing is not utilized 19. In addition to the recreation n buildi g, pool and sports court, open space will be provided in three main areas - an open landscaped detention pond, an open space seating area, a children's play area, and three larger landscaped open space areas on the site. 20. The applicant intends to construct'the entire project in one phase, if the zoningis approved for the western portion. Depending upon the outcome of the rezone request and the fact that as a separate matter it must go to Council for approval, the applicant proposes two phases. The main property would be developed with 158 units, most of the open space, all of the recreational amenities and detention systems. Phase II would consist of the remaining acreage, 2.9 acres, the remaining 44 units and the proposed Day Care Center. 21. The residential buildings would all be 2 stories, while the recreation building and the daycare center would be one story each. Nineteen of the residential buildings would contain basements. The buildings would range in unit count from a minimum of four units to a maximum of 12 units. Many of the buildings would have facades which modulate, that is rather than containing one long exterior wall the buildings would step in and out or contain recessed or articulated entry ways. Building types, those containing the same floor plans or exterior appearances, generally are spread across the site avoiding the monotony of cookie cutter houses. 22. The population of the complex is projected to be approximately 625 people, with a school age population of approximately 50 students (.25 per unit). Trip generation would be estimated to be in a range of anywhere from 5 to 8 trips per unit, based upon the average of 6 trips, the traffic would be approximately 1212 trips per day. 23. Each of the units will contain outside decks ranging from 35 square feet per unit for one bedroom units to 97 square feet for the 3 bedroom units. The units themselves will range from approximately 705 square feet to 1,141 square feet. 24. The applicant proposes constructing a daycare center to service the needs of residents of the complex. The center would be located east of the eastern edge of the westerly 2.9 acres which is subject to the rezone request. Daycare centers are permitted in R-3 zones, the zoning requested for the site, by a Conditional Use Permit. 25, The center would be one story and contain 3,200 sq ft. The center would be located off of the proposed N.E. 5th Street in the middle of the complex. CONCLUSIONS • Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified. 2. The area requested for the rezone is located in the center of a large block. Access is provide by N.E. 5th Street which intersects the parcels' west property line. The street is surrounded by residential zoning and development. While the Comprehensive Plan may have designated the site for Office Park uses, the locale is not quite appropriate. Immediately east of the requested rezone site is the applicant's 8.42 acres of R-3 where an apartment complex is proposed. 3. In other words, the site is generally surrounded by residential uses. While there is commercial zoning immediately south of the site, this zoning is the B-1 district encompassing the Safeway store. The connection between the sites is only the common property line. As indicated above, access to the subject site is not via a main arterial but rather a smaller residential street. • THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 5 Commercial or even Office Park development would actually be an intrusive bulge northward into the residential development patterns now established. 4. Since it seems likely that the main portion of the applicant's property, which is zoned for residential use, will be developed with compatible residential development, it appears likely that • the Comprehensive Plan's designation for this area will not be fulfilled, at least not • immediately, on any portion of the subject site. • 5. While it appears reasonable to rez ne the approximately2.89 acres toR-3, the common property line the site shares with the Safeway B-1 zone does raise a red flag. As indicated in the Findings above, that transition was not handled particularly well just west of this site and there is concern that a similar juxtaposition of housing and delivery trucks could occur. Therefore, a main concern would be that sensitive site planning be required. These measures would include dense landscaping and fencing to screen the residential uses both visually and acoustically. 6. In addition, similar rezones were approved by the City Council for the property west of the site indicating a preference for medium density residential uses just north of the commercial - corridor along N.E. 4th Street. • 7. Therefore, this office would recommend that the City Council approve the request to reclassify the subject site from G-1 to R-3. Site Plan 8. The proposed apartment complex generally appears well designed, but once again emphasizing the the large Safeway complex tucked in between the western edge of the site's main parcel and the southern edge of the parcel proposed for rezoning, conditions to avoid both visual intrusion and noise intrusion must be imposed. 9. The proposal is generally in conformance with the zoning on the site, but does diverge from the Comprehensive Plan which at one time called for residential use but more recently was amended to suggest office park uses. The use is compatible with the zoning and the applicant is entitled to utilize that zoning. The open nature of the complex, while obviously not an office park, provides a park-like transition to the area. 10. The buildings are generally widely spaced, and front and rear walls of adjacent buildings are at a minimum 50 feet from each other permitting reasonable penetration of both light and air into the complex and into the individual units. The low rise.nature of the buildings aid this penetration of light and air. 11. Covered parking will be provided for each unit, with an additional 152 stalls. The parking complement will be approximately 1.75 stalls per unit which appears reasonable. 12. On-site amenities include a recreation building, pool, sports court, children's.play area as well as sitting area, open space areas and lawn and landscaped areas. Pedestrian corridors connect all areas of the complex with one another, and these corridors avoid conflict with either the parking areas or driveways. • 13. There does not appear to be any reason to expect that the proposal would diminish property values, although again, the character of the interface between the•Safeway and its northern neighbor west of this site, if similarly played out on this site, could adversely affect property values. That transition, or lack of transition, creates at least a nuisance potential and definitely deprives the residential units of the quiet amenities normally found in residential communities. 14. The site is well served by schools with Hazen High School northeast of the site, and middle and elementary schools approximately 1 to 1-1/2 miles from the site. 15. Access to the site will avoid any interference with the arterial functions of N.E. 4th Street by providing all access to Bremerton Avenue and then to 4th. No private driveways will intersect 4th. 16. In order to avoid any adverse land use impacts and nuisances which could be created by the close juxtaposition of the apartment complex and the Shopping Center, minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet, the type of separation shown between the apartments on the site, should be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the Safeway B-1 district. In addition, the 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. The purpose of this landscaping shall be to minimize the visual intrusion of the shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to some extent the noises associated with the center. To supplement the buffer, and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and the property line. • • THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS IF-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 6 Conditional Use Permit 17. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; • e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; Lr • g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified although conditions appear warranted to assure that the center is not intrusive and continues to serve the needs of the residents of the complex. 18. The proposed daycare center is no more of a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan than is the principle proposal, the apartment complex. As a matter of fact the daycare center would be more in line with the office park designation. A daycare center is a commercial use which would be an appropriate complement to an office park. In this case though it is proposed to serve the residents of the apartment as a conditional use. • 19. The applicant proposes serving the needs of the immediate residents of the complex. The incorporation of the daycare center in the complex would eliminate or minimize the drop off and pick up phenomenon. Children or parents could actually walk to the center. The proposed location serves this purpose well. 20. The only potential problem could be a change in demographics which would reduce the resident client load for the center. In that case the center would not be conveniently located for outsiders and could present an intrusive noise and commercial element into the complex. While the center would be located off of N.E. 5th, that street is a small residential street and it should not have to serve commercial purposes. For this reason, the use of the center should be limited to serve only those people living at the complex and possibly those working at the complex. • 21. It does not appear likely that•the daycare center will adversely affect adjacent property, although one would expect the normal'noise associated with children playing when the children are outside. Outside activities should therefore, be kept to a minimum prior to 8:00 A.M. 22. The one story, 3,200 sq. ft. center will be in keeping with the scale cif surrounding buildings which will be two stories. Landscaping will blend the center in .with its surroundings. • 23. As indicated above, the Site Plan accommodates the needs of pedestrians at this complex by providing separate pathways removed from vehicle circulation areas. Sufficient parking is provided at the complex, although it is not evident if additional staff parking has been provided. 24. Again, it does not appear that the center should have an adverse impact on neighboring property and it appears that noise, light and glare should not be an issue. 25. The entire complex appears to be well landscaped and the daycare center will be incorporated into the complex's landscaping theme. Conclusion 26. In conclusion, the general design of the proposal as we'll as the daycare center and rezone appear to serve the public use and interest. Modifications of the design will be required to set back the project from the B-1 zone containing the Safeway complex south and west of the subject site. The setback as stated will have to be not less than 50 feet,'of which the 10 feet closest the B-1 zone and following the property line will have to be densely screened. • a ' TJE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 • Page 7 • 27. In order to minimize confusion and assure that this condition is both clear and has been clearly satisfied, the plans will have to be modified and submitted back to this office within 30 days of this decision to allow for subsequent review. This condition may necessitate a reduction in the number of units and that result is contemplated by this decision. 28. The proposed phasing of the project is reasonable providing that all road improvements and recreational amenities are provided with the completion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the approximately 2.9 acres of property from G to R-3. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will have to provide minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet to be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the Safeway B-1 district. 2. The 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. .The purpose of this landscaping shall be to minimize the visual intrusion of the•shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to some extent the noises associated with the center. 3. To supplement the buffer and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and • the property line. 4. Staff and the applicant are left to determine whether access to the parking area for Buildings A and B can safely intersect the Bremerton right-of-way. 5. All plans shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department to assure safe emergency access, with the proviso that reduction of landscaping shall be kept to a minimum and that fire lanes, unless absolutely necessary, shall not be paved roads. The Conditional Use Permit for the daycare center is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The daycare center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of the complex. 2. Outside play prior to 8:00 A.M. shall be kept to a minimum. The entire proposal remains subject to the conditions imposed by the ERC. ORDERED THIS 26th day of May, 1987. • • FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of May, 1987 to the parties of record: Steve Leitzke • 19518 Pacific Highway South, Suite 202 ; Seattle, Washington 98188 • TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of May, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke - ` Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director • :!. Members, Renton Planning Commission i4 • • THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS • 1`-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 • May 26, 1987 Page 8 • • Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen} Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. June 9, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within.fouiteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner•and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. . • The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • • • r.T • N �• U •RRE•::..N :�::::>:>::::?::::::;::>:<::::<;:.:<:::•:.;;>::>::»:•;::;;..<:.::•.�:. .':..:........:.:�.;:.;PI:71.N.N.IN�>:::DI'V.:I S.ION:..•:::::::.::.:.::::::•:::..•:::::;::'> .:.:......:'::..•::'...�.: F ......... ....... • 112-V�'C�:;:::BY> MAI:LING;::;;:<:::;:::<::;;»:::;.:::.: ::: <: ::: :>:�: . ..... ................... On the (3l41 day of . 1e , 1.9 CI , I deposited in the mails of the• United States a sealed envelope containing f.E. documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing loot • (Signature of Sender) �a{, Subscribed and sworn to me this b-16,, day of 19S°c • R No ry Public in and for the State of Washington residing at• therein. ;t::::��-o:�eet:::::N.ttinber.::::.:�':;�:� ..: .:�::::.:::;...:....:.....:::;::;:;:.::.:.:.:.:.::.:.:::::::::;:-•.:.:::•:::;:.>.;.:::::.,::.;:.;:.:.:.:::.:<::::>:::::>;::.:.::.:;•::.>:.::.:::>:<::< . .........::..::::.:::::...:.... 1 RENTi, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF 'MENT ENVIRONMENTAL,CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C;i.)--\--- pA� DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-079-89 APPLICATION NO(S) SA-079-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke. Architects PROJECT TITLE: 4310 Building A - Four Unit Apartment Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to convert an on-site day care center for residents' children to a four unit apartment building. Existing parking and other on-site amenities are sufficient to accommodate the additional number of units proposed. Conversion is sought because day care center is undersubscribed. Applicant has submitted a request to permit a commercial day care center, in the event that the proposed conversion is disallod by staff. LOCATION: 4310 N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 0 ° 3 . Water ° 0 4. Plants ° ° 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 0 ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° G 0 ° • 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12. Recreation ° ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural—Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 0 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of i rector or Authorized Representative Date RENT(, ;30MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF, .='MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-079-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 079-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT TITLE: 4310 Building A -- Four Unit Apartment Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to convert an on-site day care center for residents' children to a four unit apartment building. Existing parking and other on-site amenities are sufficient to accommodate the additional number of units proposed. Conversion is sought because dayl care center is undersubscribed. Applicant has submitted a request to permit a commercial day care center, in the event that the proposed conversion is disalloA by staff. LOCATION: 4310 N.E. 5th Street TO: 1 - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE . PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE. PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 . ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ' ' ,Y ;``::` :: ;:: ENT:;: ` ::MNEM > ' > s`» >: .: :::::::;:::CURRENT::p .> LAN :N F AV.I�*,.:C��'..SERVr:C�:...:BYMAI . ............... ::<:::::»::::::::: >:::;>:>:;:;::>:::>:: >:»::>::::::;:::.: .. :..::..: .......... ..:................. LING. :;:::> <:>:<:<;>:.;:.>::::.;:.>:.;::.>:<.;:.;;:.;;: On the S-1-� day of , 19 8`1 , I deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelo e containing - ,e,,,y -X'3vv‘ir-4..,r� documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • 'rirv. L (Signature of Sender) �a C. Subscribed and .sworn to me this S. `e,g day of ` ,P..,C 19w. L( r)--- 6-e-f2-e,--a---a. • Nota Pub it c in and for the Stat_e_pX Washington residing at Ai A) , therein. ?ro..::.ee.t: Name :::: ;;. :...::.:::.. ::>::>:: .:. ::::;>:::>: .<::: ::::::>::;::::<:::;:::<.:.::.:.:.: :::::::.:::::. ..::.:..:.:;. . :. . t..N umb:e r. MEMORANDUM To _ Date t a (5-1 " g From rgi,_x-x--150 Subject \42.3A cs—yv•sa—,K7\-- I<D0 7V1 IT i..t�l~,1tE�ry�O • •ftlN': G..� L . N c r.. . ..:{ •::G::is}}i}:v:4:...;;••}.{•::.:::::::::::: ............... M1•:r::r:r:r::r:rr;rr:I:::.•::r::::::::::. COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM,DECEMBER 12, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS,SECOND FLOOR,RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. . PROJECT NAME: WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE • PROJECT NUMBERS: • ECF;CU-072-89 ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to.serve community residents. Project is located at 4310 Building"X",N.E.5th Street. PROJECT NAME: • WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;SA.079-89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks site plan approval to transform the existing day care center.(Iluilding e'X") into a Maximum of four new residential units (in the event that the proposed day care expansion is not permitted). Project is located at 4310 Building"X",N.E.5th Street. • • • • • • • • • • • I ' • • • • CITY OF RENTON rircti T94, z.V,:,-,-- U.S.POSTAba. .�a- " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _— ,..._ _ - �_s �y-= CSC `�F-�l 'Z.!)+• •'� i•. ., 200 Mill Avenue South —Renton, Washington 98055 `� ,, '- ? P. fF$ `� '- 1I, 2 9is 01 FF i) ' o ;a 1 1 F1ErUR i . {n crOy'� ! 4c/a/ RfASpN,<..�°q ® Kay Olson k sail`s,,,, �,ee•tro Resident Manager iv such s f a 04,„\ Windsor Apartments oD,i� h offset-- ' l . 5310 N.E. 5th Street • mai//�th�t,j, der Renton, WA 98056 4 ands CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 1, 1989 Steve Leitzke Leitzke Architects East Point Plaza, Suite 401 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE: WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE ECF; CU-079-89 4310 N.E. 5TH STREET Dear Mr. Leitzke: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 12, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Si Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:LB:dm cc: Parties of Record 0 • • 2L0 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 3 , cc: Primark 102 - 1200 South 192nd Street Seattle, WA 98148 Kim Schellert 1013 N. 28th Pl. Renton, WA 98056 Camela Venesky 4310 N.E. 5th Street #B202 Renton, WA 98056 David H. Enger, P.E. Transportation Planning-& Engineering, Inc. 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Shirley Lapp Tender Years Schools 1200 South 192nd Steet Seattle, WA 98148 Karene R. Phillips Tender Years Schools 1200 South 192nd Steet Seattle, WA 98148 Pamela J. Gilson 4310 N.E. 5th Street, #C101 Renton, WA 98056 Peter Dahl Child Care Agency Licensing Department of Social and Health Services 2809 - 26th Avenue So., N56-1 Seattle, WA 98144-6094 Kay Olson Resident Manager Windsor Apartments 4310 N.E. 5th Street Renton, WA 98056 John Hashim Windsor Place Associates 1200 S. 192nd, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98148 Susan Saunders 4415 N.E. 5th Street #G103 Renton, WA 98056 qa°' ., .. CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 1, 1989 Steve Leitzke Leitzke Architects East Point Plaza, Suite 401 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE: WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE ECF; CU-07289 4310 N.E. 5TH STREET Dear Mr. Leitzke: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 12, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Si • V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:LB:dm cc: Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 { cc: Primark 102 - 1200 South 192nd Street Seattle, WA 98148 Kim Schellert 1013 N. 28th Pl. Renton, WA 98056 Camela Venesky 4310 N.E. 5th Street #B202 Renton, WA 98056 David H. Enger, P.E. Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Shirley Lapp Tender Years Schools 1200 South 192nd Steet Seattle, WA 98148 Karene R. Phillips Tender Years Schools 1200 South 192nd Steet Seattle, WA 98148 Pamela J. Gilson 4310 N.E. 5th Street, #C101 Renton, WA 98056 Peter Dahl Child Care Agency Licensing Department of Social and Health Services 2809 - 26th Avenue So., N56-1 Seattle, WA 98144-6094 Kay Olson Resident Manager Windsor Apartments 4310 N.E. 5th Street Renton, WA 98056 John Hashim Windsor Place Associates 1200 S. 192nd, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98148 Susan Saunders 4415 N.E. 5th Street #G103 Renton, WA 98056 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 12 , 1989, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE ECF; CU-072-89 Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. Project is located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. 5th Street. WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS ECF; SA-079-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to transform the existing day care center (Building "X") into a maximum of four new residential units (in the event that the proposed day care expansion is not permitted) . Project is located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. 5th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 12 , 1989, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: December 1, 1989 OF RE�� ` r' `01q do fit• , 4 n :. U % ?® Z '' fix '^ , O .�,I 9ATF0 SEPT Ems' .. 1•i 4,1 City of Renton Land UsHe Hearing Examiner • will hold a • : � ,.lk. 0 ,... ,... . . . . . . . . . , A ., ., .1: ,,, i , _ ,.... „t:,§ • •1 . in • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL DECEMBER 12, 1989 • ON BEGINNING AT 9:0° A.M. . P.M. • C � YCE INCH. . • , . • • WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE ECF; CU-072-89 APPLICANT IS SEEKING A NEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND EXISTING DARE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN OF RESIDENTS/EMPLOYEES. •'1 IN ORDER TO SERVE COMMUNITY RESIDENTS. I i!y j "�-! y _c"�a}xk 1 f•a.- -.li _ 1 -- -t':.'e --- - . . - . • T 0,� s.0• t �. " �t n ;i}r�� -q, .kl° • - '�"- ,t,'. >i -t'L ,. ;,a O L Irn t :rt. i' '-�w 1 1 ti j4 •t twit I t • •t urn tt �r\ .. • _t r_i. n t 71'} j _ hhhttt I Q I _ �� 1 I of .,„ . 1 - • ., A _ -_ •t 1r. ;E f. .12. z. ...v, 7 n tmc + I i J—!C I,Ir_- __�-_1t Q . ta_ • ,,'ti ;i= 1 h r��r11. ,t gtr7i t ,�.7 ;:=1= 1 " ---•"II" — — - • 7i 'rt. - 1 ,.. yiii. ,,, .. 1 _,,,,..... .it" I 1. . „..' _ .1. : Ivr_ „iv ..... • • REN n",r • „ t.''� to l� _ ,n .), ., 7/it ‘ _ - --)1:1 . -L, . .." .•'---m. r „ .,.II. bi I j . ...,. ,,,,, ,.‘,.._. ,,,,t,,,, . .. . . F •. I ' : tile., .."..=. • k I— I - "•ti-, I.. I • • SITE i I ` z ' 1 i it" "::. '-''' P �- 16^ I- ' . , ,I. w r>,••nT OCRJr • x� ++ i f x , a 14 1 .. ! t,.,.. _�� / %I'�n,' ?,.f t�l i e e"tA!.� ' ��• u, I t�,i,� 1 ; -'_`__`�� r i t t t'1' I �`lV. I 1 tl,ti.l. S^t'^ ��1 't I 1'y��: r • 1 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADORESS: u PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 4310 BUILDING "X", N.E. 5TH STREET. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF MENTON • BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • • - - - THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE .REMOVED WITHOUT_ . PROPER AUTHORIZATION - CERTIFICATION I , '6-IZR`j• F. LIk1.2). , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT . 9 H-R (5)'.' COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN TY-Rte ( ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR .NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY' ON lam �8• 4, � q . • ___, • . . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me . . , a. . Notary Public, in and r the State of Washington • residing in e-r on the SIGNED : • C/vnO( day of GC(' 1 o 1110- .1.1111 IC, •-.... I •-... 1111111167, b.410116 •.0,-"'. -'. . '" ,----- N , isgai 1.11101 al. ,--... . WM,l'''& 7.;1.. `4, till ATI lii./"Mt ,c.x) t . ,,,.. R , f . •,...... 0106 1 I . i .4r i 4• ;'* • fr.. •,,,Z , ' .„. • ik f\A ,...., * • • ...i I . 44-t.-.":. ..•O`"f 'I •_.!•!___. ": .141.*: 1111P• • __ ....'e- . _ . . , ...._ _ , . _ _ .... 011 _ ic ...,......, - . . .... • 4 . , . -- .7i• `.... 'N; , , 11 • • • la .v • • • 1 z = .�r. . +� ii'AU .♦ A / . 4 IP4o . ir.fri: ., ' 4114/., ; _� I1 Vr ,i 11. / i •t • ii :illy Min ir 1 ' ai • ,: .i � I. � � i I � I al r • • 4 to T , � • 1 -- 14/rU CO Lo 1 •J- ' 1 03 � q ti ti e! ii, 411' k:, , , I tk . . . +t 01 0 - 1 9. Nap Time and Sanitation: Infant/Toddler Program: Z Cots or mats are provided by the school.Each full-time T child is assigned his/her own cot/mat.All children,under the age of five,are required to have a nap.(State licensing Ages 1 Month - 6 Months: requires this of us,so please do not ask us to keep your Z child up.)A labeled blanket from home should be supplied All young infants will receive individualized care based on a daily each Monday morning and taken home for a laundering care plan designed at the time of enrollment and updated monthly. each Friday at pickup."Special"nap-time blankets may It is the goal of the center to care and nurture in a homelike . I commute to and from the center daily,ONLY if necessary. environment.Cuddles are encouraged!No baby will be fed by bottle propping.Every effort is being made to provide a joyful sensory stimulating infant room.Infants will be examined by a r registered nurse or pediatrician once a month and those examina Kj - 10. Food/Nutrition at School: tion results will be reported to you. A good diet is a vital part of your child's well being and • r— development.We provide a nutritious breakfast,lunch, rr and afternoon snack. Ages 6 Months - 12 Months: X All older infants will receive individualized care,based on a daily care plan,designed at the time of enrollment and updated monthly. xi 11. Staff Health and Safety Training: This age group will begin large muscle development with super- C vised crawling,climbing,and manipulative play.Cuddles are All of our School staff members are required to have a Food continuously provided in a nurturing environment.The children Handling Permit and TB skin tests.All staff on duty will will be examined by a registered nurse,or pediatrician,once a V, also have CPR and First Aid Training. month. D 12. Birthdays: Ages 12 Months - 30 Months: E The children enjoy celebrating birthdays.School will All toddlers will receive non-structured play time for a portion of supply cupcakes for your child should you desire.If you are each day,and structured group time for a portion of each day. planning to bring cupcakes from home for your child's There will be an ongoing effort to encourage large muscle coordina- party,please let the School staff know in advance. tion skills,and in addition,there will be a structured program for Generally,the birthday parties take place during the cognitive skills development;conducted in 2 one hour segments afternoon snack time at 2:30-2:45 PM. each day.Toilet training requires close cooperation between parents and staff as well as MANY changes of clothes on site each day. 13. Transportation/Field Trips: The School does not provide bus transportation for school- . Food Preparation: age children to or from school. , All formula and baby foods are the responsibility of the parent(s) The local school district provides transportation to and , and must be labeled with the child's name.The facility will provide from elementary school for this facility. hot lunches when the children are ready for table food.All food allergies and religious preferences are posted for the staff.Supply Field trips outside of the School are provided,but usually at least 4 labeled bottles per day. are within walking distance.A signed parental consent form for each field trip will be required of you in the event of an outing. Diapers and Wipes: Disposable diapers and wipes are supplied by the parents.They are labeled and stored in your child's cubby area.This facility requires a minimum of 6 diapers per day.If it is necessary to use Tender Year's diaper supply,you will be charged 500 per diaper. Crib Bedding: 5. Toys from Home/Show and Tell: Each parent of an infant is expected to supply the following each Toys brought from home are often broken or lost at School. Monday morning,and pickup for laundering each Friday afternoon To avoid this,we ask that you(please)send no toys with the following items: your child,except on Show and nil Days.Some nature object, a vacation memento,a picture,book,toy,etc.are all 2 labeled crib sheets appropriate items for Show and Thll.(Visitation of pets 2 labeled crib blankets must be pre-arranged with teachers.)Objects from home not more than 2 washable crib toys will be placed in your child's cubby after morning show and tell.It is helpful to have your child's show and tell in a Crib mobiles may be left up and will be disinfected by staff. paper bag with his/her name on the outside. Changes of Clothing: 6. Health Policies Concerning Illness: Send enough(at least 3 full changes)to survive even the wettest of • If your child is too ill to participate in the days. full daily program,he is too ill to be brought to school. • Do not bring your child if he/she has a fever, sore throat,vomiting,diarrhea,or a commu- nicable skin rash.Please let the School know before 9:00 AM if your child will not be in due to illness. • If your child is too ill to attend public school (school age children),then he/she also will be considered too ill to attend School. • If your child becomes ill while at the School, we will isolate him/her in the sick bay area. You will be called to come at once to get your child.Any child with a temperature of 100 °F,or more,is considered ill,and you will be notified. 7. Medications: We will give only medications that have a physician's prescription label,and with a signed permission slip from you.(Available at School).This must be signed and dated daily for medication.Medication which has become outdated will not be dispensed. 8. Emergency: Should your child have any injury at the School which requires medical attention,the following procedure will be used: 1. Provide for,or secure,immediate first aid. 2. Notify parents(or person to be called)in case of emergency. 3. Call ambulance in extreme emergency. Health Policies/Nutrition: Preschool The problem of communicable disease is prevalent among Our preschool program has been designed with the help of national experts m young people.Tender Years School is no exception.The in the field of early childhood education to provide your child with health and medication procedures recommended by the abundant opportunitiesCn Washington Department of Health are followed in this for cognitive,,motor, sensory,and social develop- w ment.We are very proud of our program and look forward to your corn- ` ) facility. ments and suggestions as we strive to provide excellence in education. Our menus are reviewed by a nutritionist and exceed the minimum state requirements. Preschool Subject Calendar: O Parent Helps: September: I Like Myself r 1. I'm Special,I'm Me! 2. School Please help us in the following ways: 3. Feelings 4. Family 1. Sign In & Out October: Our Senses Parents,or legal guardians, are required to sign their child 1. Our Bodies in and out of School every day.Children will not be allowed 2. Eyes and Ears to enter,or leave,the School by themselves.Persons under 3. Touch 18\cannot sign for children. 4, Taste and Smell November: Health and Nutrition 2. Extra Clothes at School: 1. Where food comes from 2. Healthy Foods Bring a change of clothes with your child's name clearly 3. Grocery Store marked on them,to be stored in his/her cubby in case of an 4. Thanksgiving accident.If clothes have not been brought and an accident December:Around the World occurs,it will be necessary for us to call you to come and get your child.All clothing,including coats,should be 1. African marked with your child's name on it. 2. Hispanic 3. American 4. Asian 3. School Attire and Coats: January: Space and Time Please dress your child in clothes he/she can manage 1. Seasons without help.Clothing should be appropriate for play, 2. Months of the Year creative activities and the weather.(Sometimes we get 3. Days of the Week involved in projects that are a bit"messy") 4. Telling Time/Clocks February: Community Helpers 4. Outdoor Play: 1. Doctor/Nurse/Dentist We are required as a licensed School to provide activities 2. Letter Carriers/Valentine/Bakers ghters which will exercise the children's large muscles.Weather 3. Police/FirefiCount permitting,we take the children outdoors at least once a 4. Library/My Country day.If your child is well enough to attend the School,he/ she is normally well enough to participate in all activities indoors and out. March: Transportation Late Pickup Policy: 1. Boats The day program of the school closes at 6:30 pm.There will 2. Planes be a late charge of$5.00 for each 15 minutes(or portion 3. Animals thereof)that you are late.This charge is payable THAT 4. Wheeled Vehicles EVENING TO THE TEACHER ON DUTY.The school April:Living Things must be notified by 5 pm each day if you will require evening care.Without that notification,the late pickup 1. Domestic Animals fees will apply.A telephone call will save money. 2. Wild Animals 3. Food Plants 4. Plants and Trees ' Safe Pickup Policy: May: Domestic/Mother's Day No child will be released to anyone but the custodial 1. Clean Up Time parent without written authorization from the custodial 2. Mother's Day parent. 3. Cooking/Baking 4. Farm Life If the responsible adult picking up the child appears unable to properly care for the child(e.g.,intoxication, June:More Living Things substance abuse),it may be necessary for the staff to follow procedures for such an event. 1. Birds 2. Insects 3. Dinosaurs/Reptiles 4. Sealife Termination policy: July: Summer Time Tender Years reserves the right to terminate(or place your child's name on a waiting list)any child who has been 1. Beach/Picnics absent for two weeks,wherein the parents have not 2. Circus! previously notified the staff of vacation,illness,or some 3. Vacation In addition,children will learn other reason for the absence. 4. Sink/Float alphabet,numbers,colors,and shapes.Subjects will be adjusted We also require a paid two(2)week notification of August: — and altered to appropriate age termination if you plan to withdraw your child from the level 1. Hot/Cold school. 2. Soft/Hard 3. Sharp/Dull 4. Same/Different Absences: Daily Schedule: Please call the facility by 9:00 AM if your child will be absent.Parents must pre-arrange leaves or vacations. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Parents withdrawing the child for one(1)month or more 6:30-8:30 Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast cannot be guaranteed an opening when they return. 8:30-9:00 Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play 9:00-9:30 Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts 9:30-10:15 Art Art Art Art Art 10:15-11:00 Math Skills Science Math Skills Science Math Skills Holidays: 11:00-11:30 Music Music Music Music Rythym 11:30-12:15 Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch The center will be closed:New Year's Day,Martin Luther 12:15-12:30 Story Story Story Story Story King,Jr.Day,President's Day,Memorial Day,Independ- 12:30-2:30 Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time ence Day,Labor Day,Thanksgiving,_-and�h stmas, 2:30-2:45 Snack Snack Snack Snack Snack 2.45-4.00 Active Play Active Play Active Play Active Play Active Play 4:00-4:30 Games •Drama Gymnastics Games Table Activ. 4:30-6:30 Free Play Free Play Free Play Free Play Free Play &Table Activ. •For four and five year olds only. of the world around us.We offer a variety of creative and *Other Services: learning activities in a consecutive way,so that each expe- rience builds on previous ones.We also offer many experi- The center,which is fully insured,also has a large variety of enrichment activities "'11 ences with small groups,storytime and free play,indoors available on an optional basis to children ages 3 years and up.These activities and out,for development of large muscles.Group singing, include such things as music instruction,swimming lessons,cooking classes, show and tell, and special holiday parties are also part of gymnastics, foreign language instruction,and computers.A"sports camp"program T our program. is available from June through August at some sites. /V Experiences are provided for all of our children to develop m their ability to walk,run,climb,push,pull,jump,roll, Before and After School Care: slide,throw,catch,hit,dig,lift,and carry. The before and after school program is designed to provide a combination of PLEASE CHECK Daily for your child's take-home papers supervised enrichment activities and creative play.Enrichment options include or projects.They have worked very hard on their"projects" such things as music lessons,computers,crafts, drama,and swimming. ` , and it is important to your child that you praise their work. Sometimes in the excitement of leaving,the work Cn gets left behind.Please,for the sake of your child,make this a part of your daily pick-up routine. Evening and Saturday Care (available at some sites): Affordable,licensed and fully insured evening and Saturday care is available. General Policies: The evening program serves children,four weeks through twelve years,from 6:30 pm through closing.The evening program serves dinner(procided by parents)and offers a combination of structured activities and free play.All children are in bed no later than 9:00 PM.Staff will provide academic tutoring and enrichment learning Discipline: throughout the evening. Discipline will be based on an understanding of the individual child's needs and stage of development.It shall The Saturday program is available from 9:00 AM to midnight and is staffed to be designed to help the child develop inner control, provide learning skills,free play,crafts and music. acceptable behavior,and respect for the rights of others. Punishment will be related to the child's offense and will Both Saturday and evening programs will accept pre-registered drop-ins. be administered only by Tender Years faculty. Cruel or unusual punishment will NOT be administered.A copy of the discipline policy is contained in the registration packet. The center reserves the right to terminate,without notice, Sports Camp (available at some sites): any child who endangers himself or any member of the The summer sports camp is designed for children entering Kindergarten through school community. 12 years.It offers soccer,swimming,tennis/racquetball,music,crafts, and comput- ers. Financial Policies: All water activities are supervised by Red Cross certified lifeguards. These are set forth in detail in the financial policies contained within the registration packet.The following summary highlights the most frequently asked questions. Payment due date:There is flexibility in the due dates and this will be established with the center director at the time of enrollment.All late charges,etc.will be calculated based upon this understanding. * Optional enrichment classes offered will be chosen by the parent group of each School. • NOTES Welcome to Tender Years School! G` rT Purpose: r2r The purpose of Tender Years School is to serve the /v community by providing care and learning in a loving, )11 happy,and secure atmosphere.We strive-to meet the emotional,physical,social,and educational needs of each r- child entrusted to our care.We hope in some small way to help your child develop into a well-rounded individual with 2 a positive self-esteem. Our services are provided to all persons regardless of sex, C race,color,national origin or sensory or developmental /Z disability. General Admission Requirements and Enrollment Procedures: 0 • We are licensed and accredited by the State z of Washington. • We provide services for children ages 4 weeks to 12 years of age. • Children enrolled normally will not be scheduled to attend more than ten(10) hours per day on a regular basis. ADMISSION REQUIRES THAT WE HAVE INFORMA- TION ABOUT THE PARENT,AS WELL AS THE CHILD. THE FOLLOWING FORMS CONTAINED IN THE REG- ISTRATION PACKET MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT,SIGNED AND KEPT UP TO DATE. 1. Student Information Form 2. Immunization Record 3. Health Questionaire 4. Physicians'Report • 5. Financial Application 6. Financial Policy Form 7. Discipline Policy Program/Curriculum Goals: The curriculum provides experiences for the development of sensory awareness and discrimination,language skills, eye-hand coordination,ability to manipulate different kinds of materials,creativity,problem solving skills, willingness to discover and try new things,and awareness ' 1%p0A3's a�laQaaY°� °g a qo s og o iaq 1 t Ise) as 41 ua�1�s ate; oa es*no uu�asaq�;tid�O%�a a and t en*o°Q stt 04 `�aiR�b xo alq�n aQ now 03 poi��t11+ old Beld s� a °n.02 K,° Ag°1A ism$a4� d ag aia po oct col Qlt• �i Iv m°�va°la a aQu' 1 g u� 4`D'aM1 ots0A , a`a a tall goo ooS it'so is.ko.-a zt a • a,Que Q��°iaQuaS' °Qgq5 an1 s salQ os�t aQ�ofda a�a�° �aq 0ga`n��"go ou�Q����a V�araa�va 114 s ell L ' , ).:....t.-. TENDER YEARS SCHOOL Parent's Handbook PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 61989 RECEIVED (17) � � 1 TENDER YEARS SCHOOLS '- ,,,,, ��� ���� .. a glair L.., , . T. % ; ,,,o. .. .,, .... ,... .14-7 ,.. a, p. .........,_,, .. _ 0 6 . • + . i t „ . Jr. . Ike it 4 r 4 i y i•. .S •.ef- r l • •" . ...... .", • a • , , ..........••• 6. 4 ,... • I ti .. t 1*. • .. • 44- f .. ...• 4 . . i t _ _ :alt. ,.....4. ..! •a • 1 •. • 4 416 ,f I •• 1. 10 • . , r r r-117111 r 1 1 . . sen=latorlsi i# ..... ... ,. ...... . , __ ...t... • .... .._ . . Ir.;....,-- . 46hoi . . ..... , 41 / ,,f ... , i ii • , , : cii .......... ri! 7 a iii a • 1 -- i i . • -" a, as . • ;•• .. I L 1 •l' 711 . . ... .., _ . , .....„ ,.. ,, /I,..., _ .. . .. - . . ...4 IC-? ' a . .. MN- - ... ' - : S • ? a - I . ri r , a • • . -- -'4 I '• , .• .'. :4•F • romIFIss j . • '. •.1 .. 11ia 1101 ip r. • lo, . i if: -, .• }' • O. 0 fli I' . ., . • . t ,.., ... . w. .,. . .... r g a • M • • i I( 1 • • 3 • 3 irtk., ,,, . - ..„ . .., 41111 .... . . .• 4 • *litT • - . ___., .' . 11 .1 III III - • • . .C. r. • • . W— I i . • • •4. . -A. .'• ., F.- • i. tlif. ' ..; . . . , ..... ^:11; . .' . w. . .N - , . '- i°1111111:- c, a • / .• / 1 ... , I i _ • .4 .' 1 • , 'tilliti , t. . .:1 III , , ... t i 1 \ .,--- I i .,.. _. 1111111111 6 1 1.1:L11.11.1111 . w i • . . r......., 1 _... . , , ...18P iblInre. • -. , , acqua is photography (206) 927-6117 91 5 _ 2 85 5 -2 - 89 4' 12. 7 TENDER YEARS SCHOOLS I nasor 4415 N. E. 5th St. Renton, WA 98056 277-1930 Managed with care by CDS Management Company,Inc. Developed by Primark • BEFORE AND AFTER 4P.....--....._ TODDLER CARE SCHOOL CARE AGES 1 TO 3 YEARS 41161 The before and after school Toddlers receive individual program is designed to care and structured group *EVENING AND provide a combination of time for a portion of each Tender Years School is supervised enrichment SATURDAY CARE day. Our curriculum a unique blend of activities and creative play. develops large and small Affordable, licensed, and licensed, professional Enrichment options include muscle coordination skills, fullyinsured eveningand childcare pre-school, music lessons, computers, and cognitive skills. Saturdaycare is available. and community crafts,drama,and swim- Creativity and exploration min The evening program resources. are encouraged. ming. children four weeks Our staff combines the *SPORTS CAMP through twelve years from PRE SCHOOL 6:30 p.m.through closing best of academic training AGES 3 TO 5 TEARS with years of experience The summer sports camp is designed for children The Saturday program is working with children. We provide a variety of entering Kindergarten available from 9:00 a.m.to creative and learning midnight and is staffed to INFANT CARE AGES through 12 years. It offers g activities in a way that learningskills,free 4 WEEKS TO 12 soccer, swimming, tennis, provide each experience builds on la crafts and music. MONTHS music, crafts and computers. play, previous ones. Experi- All water activities are ences are provided for all Both Saturdayand Infants receive individual supervised by Red Cross of our children to develop care based on a daily certified lifeguards. evening programs will the ability to walk,run, care plan designed at accept pre-scheduled climb,push, pull and jump. the time of enrollment drop ins. Children will learn about and updated monthly. the world around them, We provide tender care language skills, eye-hand and joyful nurturing in a coordination and problem homelike environment. solving."Hands on" learning promotes a Cuddles are willingness to explore and encouraged! discover new things. Infants will be examined by a registered nurse once each month. TT 4 ' -‘ ' *Available only at some locations TENDER YEARS SCHOOLS gaihi The- Lr1141-1indsor 4415 N. E. 5th St. Renton,WA 98056 277-1930 Managed with care by CDS Management Company,Inc. (-11*—) Developed by Primark re*P--........``` ' `` ,/� ♦`` TODDLER CARE *BEFORE AND AFTER AGES 1 TO 3 YEARS SCHOOL CARE al The before and after school Toddlers receive individual care and structured group program is designed to provide a combination of *EVENING AND time for a portion of each Tender Years School is supervised enrichment SATURDAY CARE day. Our curriculum a unique blend of activities and creative play. develops large and small licensed, professional Enrichment options include Affordable, licensed, and muscle coordination skills, childcare pre-school, music lessons, computers, fully insured evening and and cognitive skills. and community crafts,drama,and swim- Saturday care is available. Creativity and exploration resources. ming. The evening program are encouraged. serves children four weeks *SPORTS CAMP through twelve years from Our staff combines the PRE SCHOOL best of academic training 6:30 p.m.through closing AGES 3 TO 5 TEARS with years of experience The summer sports camp is working with children. designed for children The Saturday program is We provide a variety of creative and learning entering Kindergarten available from 9:00 a.m.to INFANT CARE AGES through 12 years. It offers midnight and is staffed to activities in a way that 4 WEEKS TO 12 soccer, swimming, tennis, provide learning skills,free each experience builds on MONTHS music, crafts and computers. play,crafts and music. previous ones. Experi- ences are provided for all All water activities are Infants receive individual supervised by Red Cross Both Saturday and of our children to develop care based on a daily certified lifeguards. evening programs will the ability to walk, run, care plan designed at accept pre scheduled climb,push, pull and jump. the time of enrollment drop ins. Children will learn about and updated monthly. the world around them, We provide tender care language skills,eye-hand and joyful nurturing in a coordination and problem homelike environment. solving. "Hands on" learning promotes a Cuddles are willingness to explore and encouraged! discover new things. Infants will be examined by a registered nurse once each month. Pr ISSI V i Umminilemeir di91 � lor 6111 Ctit Oil It. 41 , 4 RV INEIN ' • Y � : 22 89 • 144 - .5vs 1,0„ r reA b r Ir , t' p a •F y .\.1 \ 4. V/ cl II L. 1 ♦1 S 1 144 4 . , 1 • ,... / _. ti .... ' ., IV . '"141Pir MIA 444 61°\.. bib \ Allaesigild diva, . • el ,,., _, ,,. .,: ......, � .>` - .,.,. ., _ _ iz..• - ‘,... .: - ili, P"` 1 $7. 1 0 III I -, f ,fir lI L; 4 42. iY r T 1 T T � � t � 1 9 r �• CP� A f. IL AidaLiam PP' 1"1=1"1"1 VAL . :ttse.1....111.111160 VOW- s", 'IL...m.41MM! . toit 1111111ERM1 I J...1 1ir 1 IJJ1111.111W ,.311 I • — ; sii 111111111110011111111ft t% MINIM ii .......-+.010.01bill 1`��I. 4 111� ift , •*- - -II' 'It trlion:e47411111.111111.711001 I F •144119 ,... ' 11li1 114, mai ,, .t.„ ,. ..4' „,..,/, 1 ,..., , • . l'" pp ......... r•'..-- 0i . 11 ij 4 i, 41,1 .a. .._....nom II Millb.46. nail SI • Ii al iii.... I A ' , \ ilk • ' - \ Illia, 1 .....\ sus 1 I T ' 1.7.1 t r . • I leill/4 1 f _ P-4! . i A t 1 1 ri Li o m\ rr 1 - : ■ ■■ b 'Ilk' '* Ail.' In I ''' ,i i NJ ice` / i. Jill ill . ol/iik- / .oidamik r•._ z.ill JC) '�•. ,Y� YT 666CCtl\\\JJJ YY Ir Y� 1ztrcoo i00 9�g DES ° • • December 6, 1989 Voott Hearing Examiner Renton City Hall 200 Mill S. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Windsor Place Day Care ECF: CU-072-89 Dear Sir/Madam: As a neighbor of Windsor Place Day Care, I would like to express my objections over them seeking a new conditional use to permit to expand their services . Due to the half streets in the complex, the immediate area is unable to safely handle the existing traffic, let alone expanding one' s business to draw more outsiders in. The number of speeders going down N.E. 5th is extremely dangerous and there is no way to control this, short of putting in speed bumps . Please take this letter into consideration on December 12, the date of the hearing of the above application. I believe common sense and safety should come first. Sincerely, Carol Munn rlyn Union 550 Condominium Assoc. 4203 N.E. 5th Renton, Washington 98056 i- - , i' j ORDL.ANCE NO. :______ Far 4097 1 \/ I 1 kl I 7 Y IN,/ ?\ f:-:, 4l111l4 IIftbh. Is // t. ;U.. , a I. u I . �Iry��p _ I�-..:�.-� ,.twr" f-.�low�ay.ri- f - 1(r�Fl 1-'_LL-17_��'�- .'.� '1sA,•.' y L . . trrwn ••a 6 w . i t fry. ? 1 1. loess, ! I� ,,,ni r it oo w sI �, r 3- : r ?� 'i \ 7 a u ulwai�n �6".-. • s S st •11w NI MO IT IF ;s u l♦ 4 a t: �' J I *.r It 1 . .. , tc items t ¢ s = + (� E ` a C 4 • N'. *MC Ss-! \ /t is 4 I.gin. s €C v; !dr , I j sir s.tw 3 sr sc 1.,w tr Q\\ kr"- �� W� I � 3 1 ` l,mw fr (^ SF RI a ,SSApVAH t a Mt 1m1 Z r iiwt ••sr1 ,i rt,r ,i,r»K +/ • 1F r . ' I j�• �� t - i 111 sr_ _ icf r^ s,M .'•••••• . P- r w. i ,...tr.., x rrlt»R m Ir yy1.n-•�i sr _ W w) EE). -Iiill.jit•-ftitt . Nit• 0� <t•t, 77 . y$L - i - tn, r 47 i gnu E�� 1 2Ts.,.sl s S ,r 9 I E 6Tw r Ili tt i# It g : `�7 i u s�nFsw •Ise ,nT.sr i �I ! • tw Si . 0 11E1 1... .' r R : l - 1 j - 1 I I t '•••,ag tl Arr fl ES m,•itt i I Lk tt,,f, f, at•1c"_ . � y Sr ` e . •:: ' y I . ' •,. It 4N. , trio .;A.; .4,..i...,.v. ..,., ;,,,, . .. e i pi ,. � i � St ssr,1 It 1t 12 fr• •�'7 1 •.7 tr•ti �'4 R'Vit. t ' ,.i st'`._rw sr '.X ; • q '� !T I,: ' �d' `iSr;°y�`,,'•y�i ; p{'•pdr .+v�'•- I uWi I u f / • I ( n F It 1I1ND 1r /'1 .fw Aj/ Ih ti" .41P.4.3 •'; , 'L t1;O.D '<'-f13 I-- "`,4 I 6 r :may �t fit, t . • • „� •- f r. \, 1 a r at a ! ; /+ s. `I •�v •t .y.�• r• f ..�' �� -r a+a S�L'air is 1 = l� O R.IOt Y a ';lw, r r . , 1 R� . .ts.!.w r O Ft. X�t. r-ram 1111/• ` ..v,.� w , r� w`II s $ -1" - 1 5--7- tI-' -.-- _ 111‘ qA'> . . .'k:E f .0 ...• ',!,- ,c w.. it �+1 71 : r'LANNING DNISION �t Y. ti ri:7-,.A;:4 s I a"taT�ti, t a, sa • t 'a , u CITY OF RENTON ti't►:. • i.; .1 : ,`.. ..•. ! � , .. MI �ti • A 1 • is ~� t*:� I Tjky LT 1- JUN 2 8 19 xapreIaoad .:. . t' .;e 1.; N _,,),, ... \ •Gdl� : RECEMall 144210 .' ... . .-. e'-. -4* 1(j . .31 1 006000000•06.6.60•6004060006.•4.....0 co*.••••.......••••••••NI 06 Ps 0 10000.000000.0•0•0000004400000 • :i 4' r ,:• , • 11,1 i iv yr 4 • • (A _., e zh„ _I?) .1 .1.. /N ., .' . , • I . .. • • t v_ 4 ,,'• — a --'‘ 4 c, te ---. ON TAT.,1113. ,, ,. . I, •)• .• 1.) .. . . . • I•• • "....1• ••••••.- Oa all - 7 : .'4..' 4 4 i 4 •..*“. .4 ;I i ':-...... f*••• -* .. • • ' I •, A Z• ''.!: 'A.' . • •• 1,, .. ., . . . ..1 • I . . 2 . . . , . ••• . . ..'• 1 . . . .. V , . 1. . . 11 ' I I -A . • . i( . .:.]...i . t , 1 .,. .I . . . • ,• . , , . , . . . .-.. . 1 i . ., . . . .. . .. . . . . , e . . . .I . .• . (71 P. t r. .. - .. sli\i'.)i 'Vt. 1 :: .. ) . .. '. , — 1 t . • I .•.. . . I . . . ..- • .. .I N I ' 1131L111.44.11.31141Li113 .i I I • k . ' ... . .1 . .. . • , ..• . , . . .. , . . ..*-I 3 • ' -) . . •-. ' -4".1.9\ii.i_ . i . 14_... .. . . .. - . •..7 1 ;- I 1 I _.1;.1 'M 11 • d i ,r1 A ...... . I . • .3 1 i . if 4CPV41- I. • . --.I . . . - -.• . . ....... ...-.--..-.--- i 1 . . . . • . . i i .. . I•f 1 . .• • I 1 1, i . ..-.....-...-.----..... . --...---.-.... 6 . . . -..,......—.. I .... L......) -- . . . i''• , . I' t.4s124 . ._ r' . . . . . . . 1 . . . , . - i. . . . . , . . 3 . . . . , •4 . ' 1 . . .'i • , . . . . . .•.t: • , . . . . '..II',' . . • . . I I W dig 6 LO 400A-4)1:dg ...., _ . . . . .. . , ,... .,::,,, . . k! ' -. ....- • L',, .13:', • . . . • . ' 1. . . 1:!: :IL' . . . L • • ''t'14 4!' . ..• . . .... '' 41 4 ',4'...40.01. •'1.•.31,• . • • • , ' •L ,f:' • ' I , ' .,'' •i I.' - . ,..• • .. . . . 4.i ••!,*(11'. • i 111 • Alla • ...,.. .. Mk . f, . .. .•• . C V -cq Z-Isq u se"oOse s .J�J)J�.J)emos.Jn�.e)..�,ss.. .6.6.6.m. sea • o. .so,STATE O, e. ..,, d atiir *tate of , '' FiiYi tills ((9-9 c) . I 0 ..,. .4› . , „b. '`I 1889 1* I 9DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES �: PRO IS 0 '�' o. 0 TI-iiibrett 's litettse . . 0 :_, a H .) . The Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services Does Certify: .0. That a license is hereby granted to Tender Years, Inc. �n • d/b/a Tender Years - Renton 1..-4 0 A Day Care Center • 4311. Northeast 5th Street, Building A, Plus Gym and 2 6 to conduct and maintain at Renton King Meeting Room city of , county of •, State of Washington, 0 ' (a) for the care of children, of either— sex, between the ages of 1 month 12 years .6 and �: © /(n *70* (including 4 infants only) . V inclusive, but ►of to exceed children; (om,A) 0. ik i: _(.7.\: in the State of Washington in compliance with and pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington and 6 6 the Rules and Regulations of the State Department of Social and Health Services. 60 0 This license shall be in force from the 15t�ay of December 1988 a NI Na`! (�J9 to and including the 14thday. of June , 19 89 , subject to revocation for due cause. 6 . Department of Social and Health Services Peter ahl v. 1 DCFS Office Licensor ,�'�f�. �� 2809 26th Avenue South N56-1 �%Lt 1 =% Address Regional Administrs or Designee Bettye Scott e \LiSeattle, Washington 98144. DATED AT Sea tle WASa1NGTON, THIS Address Cont. (�1 721-4447- or 721-4080 12th DAY OF December , 1988 • Telephone Number of Office NOTE:This license is not transferable;and is valid only for use by the individual or agency to whom it is issued and at the location above descrilxal. 6 0 Issued by Authority of Chapter 74.15 Revised Code of Washington. DENS 10-06 (X) (Rev. 11.84) QX A-253 3 • t . ,25.. BARRIER FREE NOTES. =G In N;./..I 'i w 3M.5d .__ t.. z.'LrINv•STReer 1. REQUIRED FORACCESS WIDTH PHYSICALLY HYSIC LESS ANDICAPPm I. WAR PT CBANGE AND INCURB C TS SHALL LTNOT BE INTERRUPTED BY _ �i ��� _ a li •�•'N�: ININITOr Th SHALL xa A MINIMUM 4P4_1� ''C 1aldb LANIZ 1 tRl� _ INCHES. ACCESS BY L ¢. WITHIN AN ACC¢SSIB.ROUTE OF TRAVEL 15 SHALL HAVE pi m /i, GRPSS_cREfE° h ■ Pl.., \ '4 E A> 2. SLOPE OF RAMP SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1 VERTICAL TO OPENINGS NO MORE THAN I.IN T B — - — 5 12 HORIZONTAL IN1N¢DIAECLION OF TRAVEL,NOR I VERTICAL SOLID PARTS. ill J4 ' !/ t■ / G.cJP q,�TO 48 HOAILONTAL TPANSVERSE TO TO DIRECTION OF TRAVED. !. UMINATION SHALL Be PROVIDED ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE /iz :j / •P • _� r�� LANDACH PQ „N A EG Ge I ARCH NOT THAN fi'• WHERE TRAVEL FROM THE PARKING SPACE DOES NOTREQUIRE ANY S , `I�F 1h • ■ �' -ARE .3D u REnzm more ARC,THE LOPESRADIUSSTEEP.VceL He PEUTERICG A VEHICULAR ACm ENAL:.BEAOWAY. \ _ ■ I 7 y ■ trr <y'. tp O G°TOEzo�wH AS A@THeYDIRECTION OF RAMP RUN FeHALLPeAveLwN)RAILs AS lz. SPACES S LOCATED IN PAIRS WITH 1'Id TOT. O� Wq I OR STAIRWAYS,IX T INTERMEDIATE WIDTHNOF 31'.CAN ACCESS ASLE WITH A ■ i " ' 5 • �•' ( ') LS AS QUIRED N SECTION 33060 SHALL BE 48.IS LOCATED BETWEEN THE TWO SPAtm.M OF ��4°F +��a4-.{',_ __ I • 1 SF G N5 S LJ9 THE ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE MARKED SG THAT AISLES WILL ■ 1i4 W-$",j-� ! 4. 1 ATICNALETNBOL or ACCESS SHAL E PROVIDED IN NOT BE USED AS A SPACCESS AISLES SHALL HAVE A SLOPE YeYr �I ■■lL1 q F ING.CATIONS: 13. PARKING SPACES AND PPE NOT I Nt P' / - ���pp�ro �� / I 4- 9LICi�g?TE'ENTRANCEs AGCESSIBLD TO EKCEm 1 IN 48.A -- • _ ��' - Gii C� \ „oi 4 SL E, Y UBLIC eVILDING ENT[tANC¢,ACCESSIBLE le. EVER PAPARKING space SHALL BE IDENTI er SIGN • , 40' Rooas°A vuiR AccESBIDLE FxiTs. t 1•- RADe A EDHEm OF THE Moir.i' �_ ��� ff\/I7J / tCOERVAL•2 °� -- �',b 11 'O/'v V� /^ .q a 2I ILI ES. - 6. I= L HAVE A SLOPE IN THE OPREOF NOT F TRAVEL NOT al t! PAR a AAl v• ` NO��EJ --- TH ELCtILD 4HE SLOP tBoss sL MORe THAN 5. Pros/Ion D. CLEAR_SPAGe'.GROUND ALL<♦�2AN-C\ S O . ''i� Y• ''. I b ;Xi t.it,-I-,GNT$'Fb z snmN 0 pie'. s Pe oP a wacKEExcEm 1 Iry 4e Ix L • _ -• .�,eA�Qp I I EX1S.HG laµYaURS CLASSIFIED AS A RAMP. 9 ��! lY Wk.?.e / \ .:'.. INUilMLIM IMMi _;;;.1. h i, PROPOS Go1JTouRS I \ `,•1 6 4'10.. T `IP Plc ,Duval SF°Rt mORtPh 'f•Pb LDS 0 I it I II I'II%'b.E ZgyJ ,.LLLh'wLL i LDIAW 4_ 5•!'"*vo- ° , pI I ,� Ia0-a C 153-0 79-0 '� �� Qi �� 7�� 4�_tI ,, O 5tR6ET LI6YhNl°(V2,04 Stn.) "4 (SIY L.2,72,.15) OE ALDE' IIIIII Nod 615a u.�' �-'� , ol, , _L : j-. I /' i I 51r p5{'�R �t _pogitif---"IrliScr _ �,} :`.0 a Vie., `',. . .'91� 2. .°o ` i N��° `..:�iilielhAVO.��L / d in - / o Nw°n'n'w An. I z WR AREa ser. w>eL.i !. .o 0 tkl +f wli"� 'J �� --s.� ,I(.",wi�Til.`1 . A��1\may cy ;� m.z ImmENIIII�=', 1-11117. i1�/ I 1t1�►� \ "•H I I )4 ,11A II d II 1 1 I '''''' #1.11111"1411 III, �I y- J QI if 1;{`r�r— _•9^.'=`.� ■, m rL,.1 q 11��,. - �.' o I&'�nsPa,+EUT reK xi I ° �' T711 ' ��N . L ' ��1 �1LUILOPEAI\9LAY Y 1N4RE55,EbRFSS■ll p• ` V1 }� �I�,, 1�,� _ Lon Isl-a'I LrIL171E5 10l `1 erg r _ — = s.�-D a 0 s v;.r.. `�� �' ilLwAilmtl ' � t �r'l, (al a / �� _ III ''i, I 'Je"� A i`� / ,, FP�.Daa PIT ���>.���"�' � I ■ I' � Ip ■ . I �14'bpi IF µsO / t----' ,,,f i [�\�'^ alp �- . _ zr r.,ld i 4st?ieeta kf z4'b 1�' _ ', 'ot. , �� �4-7.I! rp )ffipii. I , - - QrJf1►I�[]''.�1 V ■ ,,, , ' Tr �I R 777 r—T 1r Od1._r_ air ro—�' ; '{ ltLIALH,,,,,,,,s 9Q� ■ �II C' �. \.� . IIwad` 1" rIf': I. //I'9 ' Wt.r I 'G ■ i ��� 1 ��— 'iIY Jr! ;F d1 I i(7.� II a I,, rK 1:4± 11!;IR 1 44. I ------1 ' 11r■. I' s�cll,r r ._ o • f \ �/ �4�,1_ �eIL�.,oHil � '► Raaa►l1� �� �f�1Z{�I �,ra l}'`°-ram �'/ �•;, A��' 4.� .c,�m�]s1I`o,.-rie.,.� _�� ���„w; �' .®. : • __ N �°'- 441. ., R`1 ' IA•�' ' I3LAV8y�yj 1°.I � 'iMIAIRRIMI illf.lift.._ 1-[/I�I1I-I ""lik - _',/ v.4\ i `\t,\ ' O - / \\1 ' 7 6Lw.5:i1,.*"i p 2I.lb RaAv � A Pfarasp Obi RPO E'el.&22p.r-b uti.ma t�10I I �_ , PR E.N�Y •. .' O" eol51 SASErrMEI T \I 5EE G ° Re: '' ! 7O14.05 4.co S °Y TO INN GITy p RGNT , ?A p • PINALeea A5 or 12/R/p) ' ha c ➢ . is §IR • SITE PLAN 40 .'r•'•, P, O� 'Av uJ ) yNF o I-^X G16 .LE U J0 m ~JHb I II NOTES.79-3 N1- F ' F 1. TH¢DAYCARE PAC::LITY¢HALL CONFOPM TO THEI N ,441 2SI'n 51 oI R II II 1 Co" } .UIRFASNTs aF TIE,DEPARTMENT DF SOCIAL ANO p) 18-9 J 5-O \ 21- STATE OF WASH/NGR,N,T' 0 ` 121-LII \ Il 4 9L 4Y21 Ib�-911 STTAATE BUILDITON NG ADMINISTRATIVE COD.. '' Q rG�OLE END TRUSS~ _ -~ 2.HTHE ELECTRICA C AL N Y 3060 A/v P.3'Em a/nl 3,,. /F_ E COVERED WITH BLANK PLATES,OR E swIse CO �' INACCESSIBLE TO CHILDREN. (0 __ '9 4.0 LID,I-2.4 -2.4 445 NOR 9 _ 3.MADE TH_ EMPEAATUA-.FOR THE LAUNDRY N - - `� I/ gY4 Post I61-Sus R TRUc1.14 a4.. Q FACILITY SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF w m - »-o u,T. s0.06-a gnu Dmo 5A-d----- L •4 4 Past J -` Gz P040 aR 3040 DR 5040 00 3,4.°It Gz T a ALL SINKS AND LnvaToxx 14-V, m GE.-7 -02-7 ' MI.5,74.I. Z; I.EZ`,J 1• ••'44.0 5.• - - `I t \ E:TO a USED eY SI 4..10 UDR 4.c 11,OST 4.10 UDR. R { µ' r�� JO t 4...B 1I g' $74M10 IlDR 4.4 POST 4A10 prnz. 4 T TEMPCERATURE NOCHILDREN To IEXCL.110 F. THIS MAY BE Z TER m �p0 T cTw� � R x ': n 3 / .; . - GL LEIPPAE / V ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH THE AUSE TO EITHER MIXING�\ D E%RT-- _, `1A3SAL eRAeLt;A FAUCET icx MAY ¢ I m 451GN.a.©\� \ N -¢- ZIGN 0 a' 4 BQ: _ LI P9 EI ADJUSTED TO THE DES'RED TEMPERATURE. oPa PROYIPE aTOT >4zn>R I END 5.V GEINTENSITY s ALL BEAT LEAST 15 ° 10 Cc / ''J \V STE 11 MnY �� r+r�/ .• } VeNTIL.ATIO NL pOR T411h E> GABLE N _ 4 G.„I F5S4SU I't 9 VENTILATION UST BC TRUSSFT CANDLES FOR AIJ.�tOD'R D AREAS USED FOR W -O R - \ EXIT LOCATED ST 3 a00Ve F:aVe� CARE a OOMs STUDY AREAS AND I- J \ I �- FURMaa:/ o o,y E BiT TON sI(N >T,Lea VENTS.TYP. /1�N CANDLES. CE AREAS WHICH sI1ALL B¢ 0 Pr F iTt,;',-, Yo u N G //\`. m� ��!\'}�- T'AREA '�ph Z 6.DJ DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHALL BE LQL F W 4/ ¢ r PROVIDED. aoxi PROHIBITED.D,n,.r ui.P`FOUNTAINS APE ' 'Cr; N N pRESLI.100L ®/9a) rg MULTIPURP05, KINDERGARTEN 1I .M LL LARPET r N LARPET ,SOMR RE LARPET IyuI al J. TH�TIN BUBBLERElam.Desrax Ta YERATURE SHALL BE Q NZ O W R� �` NOTE: TRUsz Ez SYALL P ELF-LLOSU E z 6R.R, ZP N I. �� p BE DESIGNED TO BEAR O/ 4� 41I BI Li . ALL CLOSET DOOM LATCHES SHALL BE SUCH az W I� I THAT0CHILDRoo CANSEs.PEN THE DOOR M THE W - li ON DEAC.ING WALL e. 7 m F INSIDE OP T86 CLO r rE G.6 ¢ I,� 11 'm\ APRA. MIDPOINT A6NOWN / °a O Q U c 3 „� 4.,.4 s S. AN APPROVEDELEITRIcumr sunranSEO FIRE AND Q j (J) posT =o © -. �' h (�I poeT A DETECTORS SHALL c¢INSTALLLED_® SMOKE o3 •. k44',, 0. N B.K� - p2 qq IN ALL CLASSROOM AREALL DE S. Ream DETeCT0RSR5NALL ,J CO LeAIR I WR CoOR ®\V INY grDF - QaRRIER/I'FREE = A - Be INSTALLED IN TH MECHANICAL ROOM,KITCHEN (� P _m P IO 21.3O ARID v/SeLFG / II _0 VTOILET Ell @, ,9 IdiMt AND THE woPR ROOM.E LL eW Q p Y W B if AMR,. \.,,," 9' 7i 41I 0-3 0-0 ❑ -P 10 EWES E%iTNmnsFER w.L De Px0VI0ED As ..CO N jL) { ,I}I - SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND„s MAY BE OI W 4 u6a RIDGE--y_8 2=T1 17•9-`1 F.H-E•P".5ED Jee)-227 _ Jro y5_,.+ f(eI �, .6 ILEL_ -gEARING WALL--y7l g m THE FIRE MARSEAc. REQUIRED BY 0 \, Y O _ C J� I 5.14 bnY N` ^1lO Yy"� •. N II.PKOVIDE LnNOING WrtNIN li^OF OG>RTURESUWOIG CC PY U 3 kI%IT SIGN4.B ND2 F © ❑ ;.;41 H',,HV° t @ ' sF__ _Fig.f'IFDUI•IT 1 H 0 Ilfe4" Q -1Ig4/. p Q LEL 0 ��1 �'JI ® III��� I �Fur� V ` j{' �'R,y`® ZIGIN IS , S DMTrNISON FWOP D¢AwiN(GiSSTOTHE0T 'Ll.L U -m WO NY M1,J G6 vO` OW,' gr D Tip' vI"'TL +7•/cR5'•.'. sa -comas,0...COMPLY Z c� E�7]"`flflfl F�L ���4qq O10y N. O ® :PnNO;!: RED TATG ,U.M.L.I U.F.L. Q I NH �ARRIEP. / LL\KI VINEIN.0 m ® ® LATEST EDITIONS: d u=I^ m sea FREE)TOILET /� 14n = II IID/A7 F lI KE' "w/ VINyt_ RM. N W Nlt .-- •,f 1 a W ,elly3 °i°`bb o0's 00 T DRAFT STOP �� -�-��is �"T� CZAR'I.�) oz2.3D aRl�a.aEzs m y1 ttI IY1 _ e� Q /\ I c2 NGUISHE4 ©• I II/ V' a %214W0 FVDM PLATE TO m it TODD LE IL a J. / N 1¢ \ .yb7 I/' `('RESLI{OOL P � i _ UNDRSIpE OP RLOF 2 I°�H,N \ : NF C.aRPET }. 4. K 4,i 6 8ts \ N LARPET _m 00EATUING.PRdNIDE 2-.4- 0 SIII- N e241Mc. FRAMING FOiZ�$ a$ _ F_ /�A °\ Ip il jssiwEh \ \ o Taus DRAFT STOP o'I .111 s.6R /V Ig.D �� o=N ' o _ ,JF STEP D0 D ze ZAO, IO >e'0v. _ A 1� d- .E I + b y Y N I _� /1M FA NTS TR s DEFILE ENT 0 �,y{ - C* cA}PET ggI'1, GarypET 7 I 0.- ✓N.10 NM 4.4?DST '" 4.4 P4's-r m Q \ . \ mg N0. 4;IOUDR 74Y4 FD5I' GIRDER TRUSz�,}y2�3'''^'PL.P. RLG O_ M �49 4�N'R 8 4n�OWDR- *MO WO, , \ D�Q O a u,iOO.R 3�i_1iO4-K so�O EXrt n T /,-_' ` I W WO F.e ISLa Ee G2-T i.D-[ie. .-.9.¢nx.so•cau G--T_ !I' _ ,IGN 36-8 s o.TRUzsES a 24'aC. O Or---- NOTE, B� Z -, c.�o 44.e,up, •'""'4 <.F.OR m p N:i yu i 0 m l0040OW-5040 P.W-304004-3040 D4. I O '--11�T/e.R Q A ,O I°AURG d ROI.b.RE ROVIDE SAFETY ES TOE IN-ACCORDANCE KITH SECTION 5406 oe } .3 "'`� G 4O<• 1I }yl0 poOR THE U.D.C.AND IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: dd m Gd LE END TAUss Id A 4XS NDR m I GLAZING ". _ I 1. NG IN S2. GLAZING IN HOWER AND BATHTUB DOORS 9I I' '.PAD Al 71I / T 5-4a0DH.\ 040 AO --\_ Q 0 ; 13R-51 ` 3. GLAZING IN FIXED Oslo AND LIDING PANES.S Er SLIDING-TYPE Q ST 'SS DOORS i.s CONO. Cam/ 1� _ '� k d 4. GLAZING,OPERABLE OR INOPERABLE,ADJACENT TO A DOOR \ I4.I-iR \ 171 4+II- L+AB`ENOTRua50R-91 II �y 34I-101 IN ALL�6uILDixcs � c�AL SAME EDGE WSA"WITHxN 12 !L I'N 3 20 `hSTO.TRu4SHA 6'24 e.0. INFO F THHEEDOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION AND WHOSE 1 pl A 9LIpR BOTTOM EDGE Is LESS THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR h- (JD 1 1_yl}g\ Uvt�PoSr,TYF. s. OR WALKING SURFACE. D1IIE0 THAN THOSE COVERED e ®. \ !oil' 1 " olggON -GABLE END TR45S .cam ABOVEATHETNEECH6.5'FLOOR A GLAZED LEVELEA OR WALEINOCESS OF S Y 1 ll EST J SURFACE WITHIN 36FI MS FLOOR IN LIEU OF SAFETY GLAZING,SUCH GLAZED PANE.MAY BE PROTECTED WITH A HORIZONTAL MEMBER NOT Less THAN 1) INCHES IN WIDTH...LOCATED BETWEEN Z4 AND 36 INCHES ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE. I FLOOR FLAN / ROOF F12.4,MING PL-4N bUIL0IIJCa X (/�/ TNTERI02 peARI NG WALL o I/41I=Ito" �L70i PLANT KEY (51u1.ANT c-KOJP a 00TAN0.6.1_.NAME roEVEE 10.04 eHlcJn c curs r're GOM.'MON M4.Mc 5 C^ bLEY 0 C/E54.01.0,OEOOcbuWs n.-10.IE TKeE Q�) 0 ,EJo¢O,l u 01.10EPT no LIg4 5,60404.TMTIR..CJPWA I^^ T.c4' �JazON \��� �/ e a � G R F» 000.0r.......1e�. Ere.ewvc.1 , , o'wla,rue - aHrw e�i.� A -FE /J r.NY �oN e.'�" r e r rm'c�.ro 4 ! µeeci 'AGEIE PI_nTN.101oes'MI..' `✓ .Nves w `\ m,wm,am".a, ��`t�j � O.4..6-o 1-,01-KE NaKWAv seInTLE WY. o es 4vE�PI.LUemal. .e%A,,,,2¢,'v'"m ky I "tee' °• � I,_, + O.eEK xe.e.+Are4M'emeEN,,.lcwrrn.�.]' /®�n Hrb v.n.tl ow�o era. ..w a,ac � Oy MUlIOW.xM lec_oN'z,d,slA.c nnnPl-e 0 cOa>` AUAel.--0'EF mocu_ - pp.xe "'p`ww r��,y. `1 K. ......a en 1. 9w-Isar 0061.0ET' .lre c�w m I �Me. ,��w. ou Eve,.ls ua.1.NEg 1.n 1 e.m 'f� _ _ _ ��v+w ®NO.xTHCIZN K ot+'E o m.e w by�cNv�i,Li �'�Yd TLn UCHIHOEG�K PT,' NcKaJ r�a.Tam o.EeeY'u.. ,,,.. o z.� L w.o c'.w QirH ` _Navy a..co . 61 :e° ¢ ; -a.w� ' Iiii.� " - .G�I E N L N 6:o ---a �1 , - c.Ia'Nq mu ^_._�<. G A s:�:. ©coNrexco to EVE1rs 5.4 TWZEE I-..HYc vnEm �'^^';,^,�.ne. k t'q: m �. �._ ritzt ��� roE000T62tier.x.wz-1Ea e-.x�..T L ,�`.I0,4.4 `4q„� . A rs Al glitag P IIAEN)i © 8 m xws R .010.00 P EEN e r yKeEN e ZV'THwA r✓I L' SBA .corew. FTcv E ,zxev.urroe. ,pl ' wr mw n.er.. % ✓ T. eNT OALo�'rTKnRWE0r.u4i' 1,1410E,6=.1-Z,61,,,IC.4.,,,„.Wla-YatYl wwm:qu'c7446 GEatR4ao^GE u"(ONcw0rc¢ 14616,0 • • w,w�.0 ie.^ar�.l� eoNlrEa 0TA Ze�_ v i RApI oI'I TLLUnY'n4LEN.IY'BAB TREE PLAZ4rMG A.e OrAKINEI DETAIL 2WRE:ROOT RANTING.., sTAKIN4 OETAR. l•INNb LTol1_ E/.Y'DMe Sa o 0s �w,M�a LOKnoo PRUCE wl,Eoy,^y.Y.awe OpPET uEJCnWs'g.0.31 S., A04 uIEPL.eAP GCCps&. 9Pw.Ic6 Konin 00,640. it ©^INUOENI NE ICF.E.A CONTORTn EiNln lvenvs �nnH Maw- ©®.102E IT,E R A°EL_I-AOE5-56. ^ ' r e'r'LVF rletm TKL15,c L .J. e� oOCr1:...PIN; E��I w,ye. �J0 7,.. c� W�a oP n O JNrx -.OK N r lia...04»I Ern Ee""'ly Icuoia i�4e a.A.A r..c .wucNaL w..,.�T.lowl r ues or. ttilifl. Ao x•,l-Y4 Ii m OP Gt,-p-ELL2a ' H L � 0e L�A gM.N��wG�. wePNwE' ' 4m. aaE 3o• P4IPaoL.a0.41.PNp cHE.+ .H� �" m o r+ eu 004.00 �4..EaFr w.wl-, ' 'xOc 10 Moor .e wsN9 BERET e .N9uefoL'uLL q-.rvePunr^Nes ro eveEn ea cre O• _daEu T b¢ e,,e.IDE 9zuo PLvNTN!OE AL �� O µE c pLE i o.,PrabrI INg APo4 0. v-tK;;'," E M^tiE. G- W-H4z�u'w.'uciw'''', PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND NOTES A r.r,T.� wvcmu ' ^A�q^ SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TO SITEIONS OF EXISTING TREES,EXISTING ON ®moo- E..cmcmc g..,.,40 ® �N 14-. 0 RSTCSE pEtiND SITE UTILITIES. TREE. 2.CONFORMING SIZENATAMERICAN ANCARDTING THE CONSTN ANYRUCTION L EROSION/SEDIMENT AREAS ARE WELL ESTABLISHED ®4, OK ,c O ORBEUR SIZE2T0 BE CALIPER,D L. HTFONF .,DESIG ATEENCASTS 0.ET EES US ATRUCTIONSITE STRUCTURES GP T1L 0 P[Es TH oL. 4a rv.m_u.,AI.. Ylv'Eo MINIMUM .2_24"ICA1.,T 12_14'XHT .ABOVET6'-...• 3.E EROSION.CONTROL ISpTOL•BE INSTALLED 0 ANY PLANTED SLOPE .Fd PruN4a e,,, P..1 9 T,,-. gn vNzicTl¢�� �\ DECIDUOUS OR DECIDUOUS FLOWERING CONFORMING T EXCEED T ONE VERTICAL,(NORI HORIZONTAL L 'oiYO L4 ICEN' ® iFe E4EeEN 6By0 l'L T RIMORNRSTANNARD FOR NURSERY BE TYPE S AND E 4. FOE TEPEAE WOO 4, FRAEXCEPTSSED OSEXCE AT HAVE ONE AL, o2'lTo vu EEN LA4.4IKiaeL e-'y. OGw AMTWAC rso'-v. IL FOR TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING IS TO BE A COMMERCIAL `-fJ (W.1) SCREENING VERTICAL,CH MAY SIDE SLOPES (� -IC ON 0.00�o semoe S 00 AG E BRANCHES.PLANTING SIZE COYESTO STOCK, CALIPER,N TYPE HEIGHT RANGE, 0 AND5. � (Ry:OPSOI ®• KT'.1- .0000JVKW -o I..+UNIr•cp T PGRADE 4c Hrb 4.-0 00," .0.61.0.5 M�/4. w.r1 ® CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN CONFORMING AM STANDARD O R EQuAL.THREE-WAY IN A ,� Lam" n.F yHo-res 4 TYPEN4(PYRAMIDAL)MINIMUM SA T TIMEIOFNPST SITE. 'ti">/a�f -044,0 c Tc Vn4q' BDR6-T'OH T,34-4'SPREAD,B B. RATIO OF HEIGHT TO SPREAD NOT LESS THAN FERTI eG� nv.Lc �-ov+ ER CALIPER 5:3. E 6(COLUMN.),D 5-6'H., 15-18"GMINIMUM SPREAD. PLANTING MIX. IN SHRUB BEDSI MI t_ EI«-.awv^ O pp,0 4JE�c W aJri-L.n wILvoN' DspVaRFFEEi. ..66.0 ET LCA ®J -1 G4.0 V.VITNIFEK BURSERY STOCK. SIEVES. CONFORMING TO SPREAD A ERE 2N STANDARD FOR I7.ZER T FN)MABP.PER , D /©�,y LT' .c J.CNWEiuiia YTr2Ele ca._V v: ecE ye NURSERY ProtD, E E DWARF2R GLOBE E-15"SPREAD,i F 2 9"MI-.PSPREAD, OTHER Eno - - APPROVED. avPLr TO SURFACE AROUND l'.J rem,e ncnLc^ ©Nr.. cU'nr..0r I-FiTAeic�uwrcx SEE T2-15"Y SPREAD, YPEEI(DWARF OR GLOBE2SHAP):RI R-15"rx ,�"M Wv0.FDE PERIPHERY CO PLANTS' 0K�q cEOLeY A OdraoLv.F N G PE 4(TOREA B6B GRHC): 5-]8"xI STED pREIMININRFDT TIME OF PIA FEVER- B) GRANULAR MEN4-2-2ION -TRANSPLANTER'. APPLT AS PER MANU- FACTURER'S x eVaagnec C�E0.UN.i G0.EENW 2U 4. SIZES L U p NTING AT K.0,4,,,,mmucLLo zi, .o ONe'zEn HeL-64.0 -1"00' DECIDUOUS S VBSR ONFORHIIG TO A.S.N.AMERICANMSTANDARD FORERY ((1T ONLY). TABLETS, TABLETS PER TREEULA, 1 GRAM TABLETS, �0 ,4 Ew�`<.0NFti� R5O E2: IB-Ha4"H HAN S G 18"AND U PE L:18- aS40a HT., T LESS T x ITC DT18 ESpN0 UP-TY ]8-24„xT' tt B- A)E FORM AB 6 PER SHRUB, Az�.Le.. OI-O.vPM co 'Ae.eTf:p • 4 2 G 18"AND UP ttPEWp(SUMAC),4-5•PM 00.¢PANET4'EAND - FOR w' - 02.P y�we b a o�vl cn MN0,0- PP,,N5/8"iCA IPER. SIZES LISTS ARE 1 MUM AT TIME OF PLANTING. e)A GRANULAR ONE 4-2-2N' -TRANSPLANTER, APPLY AS PEA MANU- WUIo O.w,Ap.F ICE wiel-e S OTHER CO PLANT. g0 .� n�U EVERGREEN SHRUBS. CONFORMING T AMERICAN STANDARD FOR FACTUpSRIFORMEPLA RECOMMENDATIONS. ���� NURSERY STO X. PE 1($PRFDING): ]E-IsvDSA TYPE (SEMI-SPREADING): C2 YEAR 1 Lv)`ITI-'LiETA -D R FORMULA, I GRAM TABLETS, i.XnN4.H KEY No-re, NI2--15"SPRIGS I2-15"HT.,TYPE 3(BROAD OP DWARF):12-15"N 9. AWN AREAS, L'-I'.^o"„cNov4 p D BE BRB 0R . LAWN .1 g N M WHERE 0_ T,NC 9 �G�- 12"MINIMNI SPREAD. L CONIFER EVERGREENS TA E 1,000 ST.TOGETHER N_ 4oi'sa T4CT m1. TO G�LY'.ce 850.0/41 © H I^1'w Iy�J NYPROVE• USE NO.1 QUALITY TWF. MERALO TU0.FGW , , R OTHEREVEN GRADE THEN ROLL FOR ORO55rzN[EETDICOVER sEAGLTCOM \J G.,, e'^ptl u�HEw N�1 ntrrHPl� .a0 D PUPPLI E0.. 55 J B 0 FIRMNESS.rv00G. N ✓ E KEVEOGa BODI A Anni.Jl.s 0000T 5.60.0u. . . . AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE FIRST SOWING,' B LIGHTLY FEET. XT.o ALL Cm 00 pew b iNNM PIJMT K'WI-4-MC -�,..�SEEDED LAWN. USE WASHINGTON STATE NUISERYMEN'S ASSOCIATION APPROVED. RHQLLRn4�IB c.-ILATA INVGnTEo rLN41'LnN. 11. EMOHINGCAP CONTRACTOR 5 THROUGH .4.6.0.In oAv .. O P F -RELIC yv ^''�•`( F 30 L BEDS SQUAR. AFTER FIRST E FEET.FERTILIZE TURF WITH AS6-R-4D MIX TAT ®oFKIN,1, nNUaL...�Nq,10C, ef' ,rrPel TKe -OeoK PEE EVEK.KEE,,c PSI.x.NOTED R..AM.`P4 ` PLANTING ¢P �wLT.IE.a^ MuLCH TO BE EITHERMULCH OR FIP B LD .MEDIUM GRIND,DELIVEREDINIMUM IN BULK TO mwa✓ �a � E II.THE AE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDEAFULL ON GUARANTEE • ONNA REPLACE 0. VBW D. • 4 H WILL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THETEN APPROVAL F THE ARCHITECT,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER. IHETrLANDSCAPE NoeaXTH WAS _ Tamarack DeslgnEG croup/DSGR . THE REGISTRATION SIGNATURE - um.,Arcr'I'ecw.e• Iv Mlpn = THE HISP DRAWING OF HIM RESPONSIBLE NOR LIABLE FOR lee IN Avenue Nor. J • x HE PROPOSED PLAN. SeaLLle,Washington 98109 1206E 283-0683 `o"3 '©zm'•© I'o ''O '0''0 ' 0 "0 10 -3 '-© • 125' a Q Y® BARRIER FREE NOTES: - �I - /1 r ° @ �1 O "© o` © lvl Na Net .. 1. RAMPS REQUIRED FOR ACCESS BY THE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 7. WALKS,RAMPS AND CURB CUTS SHALL NOT E NTERRUPTED BY K- ■rr` +R - r •79 r,i' oe.Fr�it■�`- v �A ►►"I • SHALL A MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF NOT Less Tem 44 ABRUP CHANGES IN LEVERGREATER TM 1'. �. i <l\,q 1�3 3!e 4 drtr�N� 4 4 BPS^ �,1J � ,�^ INCHES. RAMPS e. Es SHALL HAVE °a B/ A r� 55,w'LTe •w nJ G q a -I z. _STEEPER THAN 1 VERTICAL TO WITHIN Re MAN in In L.ST CIE.GRADES ece BETWEEN ��i `� f i��� - �1 • i Fp°ed r�;. '© °. At 12 HORIZONTAL INTHE DIRECT ON OF TRAVEL,NOR 1 VERTICAL SOLID PARTS. - -' I /� L yAla, 'IJ 9 TO 48 HORIZONTAL HTRANSVERSE TO T9 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. -e- ,r 1 r^ I ' ^ G ti ILLUMINATION SHALLACCESSIBLE �• ` R'a- © I ©pp91 A' �1-, .m�' ti� 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL SHALL HAVE R. ROUTE OF TRAVEL, ENSITY OF NOT LESS 1 M''n )]a' ��2�_''v • \.tills- �©'it•s f Q_ '{L 'p, Z 1- RAMPS BOTTOM AND AT LEAST ONE FOOT CAN=AT GRADE TANG THE ACE I ALL BE %S AT THE TOP S0. ONE PARR NG sP E SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH ADAPTABLEOT DWELLING UNIT.AC 11. G FACILITIES FOR ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS ESSIBLE ROUTE of IN RUN OF NOT L FROM°THE PARKING SPA EEDOES NOT REQUIRE ANYtesLAN o OF)�(: Vt l"-'z�./_u`.',: -�` ^, 2 30'DTOARE'GREATER, A ARC,THE s STEEPER THAN lE S-PI ■ 2.-a. :S' 0 V,!•••o :m-',4 0C'/�■,1#/ ■ �� o 4'0- '© <, .O N OF "G°R"OT20oNH ve HANRAILS AS 12. PARItING SPACE sHA WITH THE TOTAL I o z pi- 0.,,. `�/1: jF 10 H'Rp.l( 1 a •�. 1, <c' VERTICAL EO STAIRWAYS,HORIZONTAL NTEPM¢DIAT¢ WIDTH OF 21'.S AN ACCELsNAiSEE WITH WIDTH OF '�pp' / �1 ,/ ag De. (r J AL REQUIRED IN SECTION 3306J SHALL NOT B¢ 4E"x BETWEEN THE TWO SPACES. O 0 , J -_ Q 'to: SE CONS REQUIRED. E SHALL BE MARRED SC THAT AISLES WILL F .■�1►. �`p F) ill PACE. �� >,n:� ._� e- d @ -•� d ._ 40 -'.'- e. 4. THE INTERNATIONAL LOCATIONS: OFACCF_SBTSHALL B¢PROVIDED IN NOT Be USED AS A S ..4 �1 ` i �Y1 ,`.1 THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 13. AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL HAVE A SLOPE NOTTO PV. 9 P 0P' .G,, . '{,/Jam. CAI. *411%. p?ITEENTFAN ACCESSIBLE PARI(ING8YC¢ED 1 I .��� 0 D'r_' 4A� ,}�rgs ��■!�© ,� .y;_ ENTRANCE,ACCESSIBLE 14. EVERY PARR SPACe B¢IDENTIFIED BY SIGN €'` !4;; •� ! =1� 41fr`j ll,■ �1� REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE"EXI'TS. ENTERED M 3'-5'M GRADE AT [� �, 1.i W4 t it o. ill,: .I- rIlMaT�E�LP CENTERED FROM °SHALL SIGN SHALL MARKED WITH 'p �` �._..-!-- �' f'G: ♦YMBOL OF ACESS AND SHALL ARE THE.LED PARKING PERMIT REQUIRED." I 1 OT G SNAG 'O NJ}�h MORE HANI5. PRVIDE LEAfL SPAGF:ARLINO ALL IiYDRAZ -. L�,1 AA 10 !.. I 9•��k SYIG t-K.�K_$}b YL�MA N O• 1itrá: ■ _ �.xIStIG Go,uYouRS - saoEL` cL°1'DAssiEi®AE`�RAPreR EXCEED 1 g y sue. •E^ n a! r91it :�' llinr�ID■ E 4.17i, •: p12,POSo cauTOUP-S 66•I zoN� it r 'O Oat; '6^ ,° f 'tl)■, o, emit m I► "%Iv a 3- ..' z9PI2IJI0 tAbL�s o e.• : ,,La Sh../ Kt 0I,, ■ _ f,` �z�AraA.0e.el '0 G fUJ' e'' 'O�T'E' I II '© IIfibO 2PLL/Vn teY LL ■■ fj� L' y M 1; ��i° �M 2 *9 O t 0 a` -ya„.yd- �1 6AZEAO .s., hp.-C. Is3-o 7--o A ■: • p, f ro, 1•• 0d e l p�,y ..� y.= �uw A�J7'��R]7'7J� 3J� ■ �I �I �" f! StRSEr LIIoUfiNm CIroIJSm.) A CSIv LwArlolu� 1F d cue e N 1 f:+ 11011111.G 4'e e O -- > > t�i p Er „-ni(� C 1 yJC-.tt.1 "O 1■r �' 1 n i! c. tg ID / S. N x 71444�'uh�`u;� b4 --;; �ee�IGy,41 p x� +1 M) '� ... O •'r r�`� ai•l „2, .,4 : 'r�3..:n:.r, sm.. ^n.Ak ►�; =j■c'.3�fl�+ a ■-� Y i',>. 5uM►s+�a E ,.... . 11-I)p�1s fii S ,i rIFI •■-Gt f0A1. y M'<E3ei sz ►■r4va-,Y►i vsa 4Sr l„4717 i0 T 19.4�sc-a: �� O° i v #'.-, HIV ■r' C"�f :_•H '°w"'''' I.©''II' AKHA "" ""' ail'` 10-Vc .:."reoglI �-� ?Toil-'o +e .v s � #` t p rg%r�°A':At`r---• 1p 9� a��' P!.■ 1 - � - /.1 -� i I O `O.I� -O G^' [ ---��� u ��I w�ID r ,+p Act ��r. 11•/- ►�,.* ��, ° 'a O Y 1�.. ,34i . �- ° VAN a 'ii iMM. �6� nlgt i t s _ E7 � o � Q .`� 1>.;•■�'��1t'-rem Q a •°-�+ ���, a U -� O° � o "!� ° (E���.a\ti.L'+i- ' a --.,_.mow.. . e�): F v�.a► E e .y© !N e C m A o ro 3 o fc.! ilgi r� © C+ `3 3 --III � gyp. ��Y 1 I� . o r.� �� � Ili o`• . 3 Nor.�' I3•■•4r-,:^'� el _.ri Alp \vl•K L P.3 ��`Eica t�O '� c 10•1111 O r.Q 1 O m io. 0 Sij' fie 4-0 q 3 ® - ° a v■■:JIAi:ale k t.m.A I s w r► �,v '� � •° O _ �\ lei v � r 41f i w � F s� 1lxf', 4'i ',©- gA1i .t_ :L' •'t=t© -„ . -`<> 6 ►/ � .� �[ �©`Q 'O �ir FW' ''O ao © -b�a-+ U 1 ■ ; � ° R�r c " 0 I 0 0 t r i r v "© #'� °/iI s ° � ca 3 �■. r�� ! 1` r 4 LDRN• N,.Ss,-,.� tit ' 1<_.�, o-\ I�I �' ■ -;C! r� 0 yr I Dt G�,-�,� O ° -- t ,,� A O .'e� ©Ori,' 3� ,14+',,�1+y9 0 +p ©[ ,, -FILM ., N ' a Eh< �f;7 e� e.'0 y)O 5 l: I e„r 2 5}AI.I.,eD ec ,. - ;iN r E r e,�' 1 1■■+A�'' 4. 0 ty ^ © ! .v ° Cp.-�R-\w':•i',,J f3 °�•�• _� , Fx..>„,, a • . •/..p <r It., TO 3 1.. ■�. rife _ E° 5 11I r4 V. Y=4Pl �� /l y =-0 I .0 � i7. 1 1-:._ I ,1Lc•.: o• I^:v AG:»: C 7x" ?ra_o.: '.4 43 `> ? _'°.� o ; v�►N r O O"\ 4 ,lf TQ� Ir .°�.iyi-.-_lv--,�a_�---- '_`.3 ..... �1 7°�,AF,::, 1,4 .a 7.,,m. 1 :?, 47 , i�' •■f Rig%. m Z 4 ��/�J « rz_ i =16:.T.■a_:ei' fe 3 it.hf' y...� `442,,Vi m �:I .. art _ O mGd ■+ Ee�i jj ��b G t �t 0^ ".� ri/ 4.S // j.�1�� °�1�T r fiirLr�,.� � ��`~^y� t1 P© r.-3.It E ••' \ Gf, '," = i■.I •U 1t;- �, -Ur. '°Vag rt> _-A-,R .(4'' �' : 3 r. "� f, 0 6. --P_-e �#••'• ��, 'O t R: + "�' � 'l 3-`3-` ��ce ..iv °r �' „• 1 •`�• re,1'''i��et �g' G° G '° ".N` 4.1 0 �c k7 ' - ■ . ;a.1W, °' `>1 'ie --i ""'�'r°rt. .2Ir .,.° x - 0 >� , ,e,;� '' �!y 1 o �i�u 6 i4e '�a °.� E f o 0 WI °°,1 ;.,'© r' '©- i.,Ly,�. ='.,� ifr:r0 D) - T c e'E, m -�"'ffi;.:!l .-��.tie��4 Y- ©: G• .o W ��49z,, I ^CCL. 1 of /•''tJ9 q�� ^r„ •t ;;�• isc qy. O ri 1'Q Q r '.fa_.,, ._i .T+ II ae, 4 i.QW7 ■ `._yell _0y I:=I �7 a i'YI u� I 1• W lam• v 41 :y' 4e-E - 1 a 1� 1,t yam, :I °ems e"" F �►A •° r o Al ♦•�,.4L1 - y. �ia_.i -.,'WI' ( .1■ Q ivAltGi� � //t 41�� °/►, ij,`Ng � 2 d. x O 4•i ri1 1 ■ 1. le* © i ■ . o 41 >1It t-� � � I"f V 3Tify -a1 lr, _ i � t -79, ,. .4,.. 01 `° PLR a!' EL ^� ;.r•"'.."o � © �L ,. � �' a I\G3�lIQG1�. ■ 61 JJ r�_. M °. �o •'•Iw ���o.iffilik -a�o -en '' .t•' © ° © : PPS © St fi -?• ���1 I a • ° o - 'vet L ��E ■ �a ° x - r� J I © � °C �� war-6 E �` 3 Q c J 3 �C■ O .`.� I ?l� `' <IsYfta�� ■ 3^'L [� rdt F/i G p a L •yr 1 �I 3. I-A ` • a•A t, A i.,;�0 °-w d (/°� �'a�C ,j 1r r1 a as r O �,. "t,'1-0 2 •` a,+a a4 [P � 11 'G a � OA ►�.r� r _ � �r�!'I�/ <'a 4 L� J.1 1 L' 43-1 s' K� �7v.Jr'... �E'. Ali 3 r^Q' 4�a �'�t,r i� i!, #. cr• �.. 4a►r# o_ o mtaie\'1► �i»JP■■l o,-, �:.o Irs..6,,,,ThA.,� Rip A *.*:, a-_--►-1 4=4 �_1 i_i -e .A.fih.1_: I Lie_mi _sue , ' � . . 0 .�. r� .®1a�.� ��AZs,��� -� : _�.' �.�� ■o��c� +a_?v Ai'� © _ ilyE r 1 r/ 1d'+im�J-� I- a � �tl _-������,I�'� o O O +ii ii l=m-,IAVE i i © ° ii��� , • . ; IIII . 2.. a <ee O 3LAVD5 P L k SLR 4Y i>i:._� OSL.vGe":.�. 'Q - 121 - lOI-OI I__ I10-r) 1111.011 I O'Srly .K l-O II 74Loll 771 0I • u ce 05 o' .N ,z•:e1' +J v I• °Pl�o(sev:` 221 NIDE PAVse RPAD 29I ?/N xt2'LI y;DICATED \�ym ex....5e6^4 lte et 0 EMG0.GENLy ACGEs3 20 SLOPE SASEMENT SEE GIVIL (TEM5 t1l�LONITI0 DN5,HIOY To THE oh"(OF RCNT✓1•I "�' FINALIZED AS OF I2/22/85) "© q CTyt '.G We >Z.'eil -o '.o c© c-o -a 1.0 ,o m, IQ 0 ',a -e. s© He,Niumete.m. eYNo\_ n"Crmr • SITE PLAN 0-4oAVA .". LANDSCAPE PLAN • G Tamarck Designroup/SSC:R ScaLe 000 c0 Avenue Re1oR� a" LANDSWE R3-oLP3 -ST,Fwnc �Seac 4e wa4DYe x:cn „,, Izi=4a n1Ryc0O UM z rt IP P 2''G ryO, I ` b /// G4DLE END TRuv+ I I, GABLE END TRW,' , L.I.IL, ') fitly , 2+c4 T.P. ; 11Ztl FLASNINI: LL1 ? 1 iw4 Tc.BE�KL LED4R SIDING; WW =NH aU !k� "iI FLASHING 4.10=M� 2w8T.K.LEP4R ��=I`� "2KB T.K.LEDA0. y SIMN �6Y 2w5LEDAR1 1\ II = Ic47K. EDAK �NNELTOR• JS1MPSeN toNNEcm0. _ pIR VENT m .a 1...........)0 "A0.D�ND cOL. "' ` 34' _ JL�L !P! �� V~b \ ��IA4 T.K.LED40. a —�• 3Ltl"AIR VENT-METAL 4Ab AK POST - ,• 12 Z a m " • 6 ' c DLL!- _ Ixe TK.LEDAR alFP LIA CO (D : _- 5 _ B T." GED'A - L' _ 4— — )—= it W. '1 %. � to CO 2i1Q Dh. � — _ I In == ■� _© '©© ©© II Oil IA© m a. Z mu si ii El IIIIIIILmiii i __ - 2_ W :Cyf0.FENLE L'_ n4 DF.NO.I t=_; 4"MAN.SPA. ' 4w A, 211Q as (-FL00R LIME ILL Q NO�TN ELEVATION ' 50UTu LEVATION Q rm N mO.O 5PLINE Jf.-TYP. 9 N Iw Z ,U ,i - W C)Q5Q' D3 • J m a ko EN11 I 241 AIR VENT-METAL IT k.Y I `' Ql0 �II.•H-K.<EV, I' , ��T.,.. _ I I I J - —_ •� ��-\'}w l0 BEAM C Q I2.NEI4NT �— _ 1 \4n4 cEDAL TRIM 1 I1111 111111 =„-I _ - ® - 1 1II1II1I Q T T11TIITI - 6'-•JV••JV�•.J ITIITI TIIT c.G. _ - Is. /oab DP:NO.I LPL.. PLR.kIN. — -- ® _ - ��ss I T —). z-.-r4K4 LEDAR.TRIM 2 ' —`2'Q D.S. , `F NISN'Faro. \ i . ZII DS D 4.' 21�b C15. MELNE E4 PMENTR 3 AST ELEVATION t riPl IN..y11 --,I} n 29"a13°WC VENT F -�I - U/12 57D.TRUSS -aj cr - .STEP FL49NII�IA i' , • j Z m NOTE: C 3 m PROVIDE-24 GA.GALL ZNT. `ASPHALT LOMPO6i ITIaN A� MTL.FLNaN1NG p6oyE ALL Z{IINGLES -) i¢ Q . ��A 4�w IO BEAM ¢ D D WINDOWS t DOoSh.T(P. 1611 AIR VENT-METAL 2.6 L DeR �,�2a0 T.K.LEDAR WRAP"•UND 1.4 T.K.LCD4R W lab CEDAR-TRIM-T.K. co411111111111 : -11*. I- LOEATE -VarOUTh Ovgy� — 6K4 D F.POsT M sil Z LOICNE;R.TFIM,T7 P. —P - L --1� R.NEIGNT J 2aB T.K.CEDAR.TRAM I I I 111 11 11 —_J 11 11 Ill1 I 1 1 I l l I sU, s.A. - 1 I 1 I 1 III F.Q Q WHITE AL.545N WINDOW ,T•(P•` 'T I I IT I T T IT I T 11 T T 1 T - TIIT MITI Ztl�D6. V r W Lc 4,7K.BEVEL LEDAR SIDING ' '.., Q LEDAR TRIMI a LORNER,T,P. .111 221+as.—� 1 F _T RR_LEVEL C ,(T I�I 24,D5: 4a/n EED•RTRIM (Pw4 D.F. WEST ELEVATION ION 5.4.-SAFETY GLAh5N TYP. . 411_ -0'1 DO.T1 -1 i14IIJ! 'flfl1 Thu Z 17 o f CI m 3 co z N ; p O' AA^^ e* HH O.WT a 3•i r. OJ MS 1 coo no ' RR z: g ma. ,c �l J: o y 3 ec ' s r e-F / 1 I i m O f o MONNOE AVE. m i s < D , \\ o m a O o t UNION AVE. r; /� / ,_,_Z' /----'t .-__-. , Escape into royalty and enjoy 8 d "�" !' ga� c our 1, 2 and 3 bedroom homes lUll U - 1THSE nwith features fit fora gad ^ King and Queen. _"n a x ' COMMUNITY ,i ROYALTIES ,) APARTMENT II • Indoor Pool ROYALTIES • Indoor Jacuzzi • Indoor Sauna • Individually monitored • Racquetball Court burglar alarm system • Adult Computer Rooms • Washer and Dryer in • Children's Play Area each unit & Computer Room • Walk-In Closets • Tanning Salons • Fireplaces • Weight/Exercise Room • Refrigerators with • Lounge with Party Automatic Icemakers Kitchen • Satellite TV • Sports Court • Outside Storage off • Tot Lot Patios or Decks • Covered Parking, • Adult and Family Garages& Mini-Storage Buildings � ' Available • Near Shopping& LICENSED Schools CHILD CARE AND PRE-SCHOOL \ The Windsor—the best of both worlds! Enjoy .......1 a comfortable and peaceful lifestyle as you become gl IT I Deck o part of this neighborhood community only minutes Deck Living 0 __ away from everything you need—work— schools— 4 Living shopping—recreation. Located in the Renton High- I I 1 itl't,; I Dining lands, The Windsor offers a quick escape from the ,Kit oid Eastside, Seattle, Tukwila and the Kent Valley. 1 D J Dining I :o,° �, ■IN= Our spacious clubhouse, complete with fire- ;IIIMPIIPPIPIE 0 Mill I) Entry �. i y ::::Kitchen:: place lounge, offers a full range of on-site activities- :uun� \ OM fitness benefits of our own rac uetball court wei ht L JIIr;_ •... ....1. sure to appeal to one and all!! Enjoy the health and °D:° Hall =�:::�� . x DEEM ... HIM****—* - q g Imo' e \ / 0 Entryand exercise room or a daily swim in our indoor • II pool. -- 1 Bedroom I Whatever the season, relax in style in our Master Bedroom indoor Jacuzzi, sauna or tanning salon. Our service Bedroom _ oriented on-site team invites you to meet your neighbors as you join other residents in a variety of planned activities such as aerobics, wallyball or a The Cambridge leisurely week-end brunch. Our convenient on-site 1 Bedroom • 1 Bath licensed child care and pre-school center is a dream The Canterbury come true for parents. 2 Bedroom • 2 Bath Each floor plan has been designed with fea- tures to suit royalty. Spacious and energy efficient, each apartment home has a cozy woodburning fire- .....1 place, convenient storage and laundry facilities, T 0 r• satellite TV and is equipped with an individual Deck \ o es burglar alarm system. Living Deck c Living rn rdl \ :um !I Diningit I Kitchen o p Unit type: Rent: rf 11 E D Dining I �c �'! :I� Deposit: Move-in date: _ ��'�D_ • IIH i ;S. a Entry ,Q DI \Entry �` Leasing \ r — 1I►I I Hall I Consultant: Hall Master \ ✓ L Bedroom li Bedroom Bedroom f Bedroom Bedroom Managed with care by , CDS Management Company Inc. •Z_romor___I � The Winchester The Monarch 2 Bedroom • 1 Bath 3 Bedroom • 2 Bath ( E54.:0- -- 1': gr] EXHIBIT NO. 9 _ .-�.• e kJ 0 q q gq ITEM NO. 5'4 ' `57 9_ e9 , .. SUMMARY OF ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES The following is a summary of the arrival and departure patterns of the children who attend Tender Years School in Olympia and Renton. The Olympia school has been operating for two years and has 60 children enrolled. The Renton school has been operating since October, 1988 and has 21 children regularly enrolled with two drop-ins for a total of 23. The 60 children in the Olympia school arrive in 40 cars since some trips are made with more than one child in each car. Although the Renton school has operated up to now with only children from within the Windsor Place apartment complex, we believe that if the school were to operate at the 70 student level permitted by the State, the pattern would be very similar to the table below. OLY4PIA RENTON Trips Percent Trips Percent ARRIVAL (AM) 6:30 - 7:00 4 10% 9 24% 7:00 - 7:30 8 21% 12 29% 7:30 - 8:00 11 27% 9 23% 8:00 - 8:30 4 10% 6 16% 8:30 - 9:00 4 10% 3 7% 9:00 - 9 21% 0 0 TOTAL 40 40 DEPARTURE (PM) Before 4:00 6 15% 0 0 4:00 - 4:30 4 10% 6 14% 4:30 - 5:00 4 10% 6 14% 5:00 - 5:30 5 12% 10 26% 5:30 - 6:00 14 34% 10 26% 6:00 - 6:30 7 19% 8 19% TOTAL 40 40 C)11 OE i2 y&o-re- ga43-0-vi 4//e44zi AO A % R1 /Med l: /©/2 /g 6:e5-6:30 2 /1 Z ,/ i/.'oord/'Jo _I ift, , 6:31.7"0o I f o '/.'31-5-'o 0 2 /17o 7'61- 7:30 2 /170 ,z 3V1-5-13o q .2z70, 7 31-Voo 6 3320 c 7 5:31 -6.'e o g 2270 3.!e1-g.10 y 2,21 b 0i-6=30 3 0 ?'3 t:31-`/.'ixD :Z, i l 70 ✓ ed �®± 77 / 7 /L %% 10/7 L ? .roo-.413- / .!'Ce -q!3o I 57o , 62*700 ':3/- Soo 3 17o 7'o1- 730 G Sc61 -5J30 I( 21 ?�Z0o- ✓ 7:31- 7.'oo / 310 ✓ 5731- Cleo q z1 P6 sf.'or - g 3 _ ✓ 6.c/ -d;30 2 / ?a , 5:31- ''oo 3 = 7 Ylc Pd. •/z _ /3 -= ' Y i/o 14 /01lb /7 C. -6,'30 /A. / i.l'&..-y130 2 /skge 6.13/- 7.'b0 .Z 1 `0 ✓ 1/'3/-51 oo 2 /I o y'el-7'30 5' ,200 // •5)o( -5-23o 3 ft!, 723/ $foc' 3 41° - 5)31-i:co 2 l <c ?IN --$:30 2 1020 / 414-6'30 .1/ ,21 le, $:3/- f.co / 51, / 7O 7 ,9 e/ "Z o L £ l °$Qi`Ad 4 . OQ -1£;s pe_5) Qc;9 -iO3 7.01 Q£;.8-1a;8 a _si oar' -1£:S °3_Sl e 00i$/t4 — '1_51 e Os;.s -l a,s o5 off' 9- oc'i-N;t oS I ooiS-1E;h Q3-91 0 ()gild-mc9 ,3 s f E of;ti-ov;h c5_a! z of;9-00 , oz $l1, 184 9/ _JIL,1, 1 r 0-1- l'ci 0Q- -16:€ aloe r oe:7-1Q;? ' III 1 o tt-10;R o'4 b1 9 a Col g-MIS °.- / on-Ich 0,g4z' o of ts-lots VIC , (2174-1Q 9Z0/ D' acts eth °eh! 0 0o;'-•/F 9 1 se ,h-00;J7 0 0/ z- 04.1:9-0 'g 1 Z. 1111 QdS,‘ 11 A200/ LI ,z1 0". m 7.9 I 00,,b-164. °z 1I Z A oir?_ 10:9 -iv r at8-Ia;$ "4 hZ" S po., -leis °eS£' oo,Q -1 Z ql /7 i errs-fps o ' ,9 0E/4-,o, o" 1 ° [- -lf,h tip 7' 00'4-1 '9 '''' 27 00/7-e9iJy al / OE;-Oa, 47 2 zla, 7416,..) lig, AlieJs Z P If litee4,0/ A tf 1(/ /5 17 1:664.30 z I f to x/:oc__q 30 • y I 2 / Yd 1:31-No 3 16 L 1:11-57c0 7 21 fo t:°1-7:3a 26 70 57614730 H -� /6 Aa -31_If:oo `{ ,Z I ?6 5--)31- 6loa !I; Lt 2110 $:al -g:30 3 /6 ?c 62o1-i13O 1i 9" 2 If !o 8 31-!'oo ' j_________________ 1 ? 7o 17 701 11/zz 19 6:co-oa ,z 11& ,92604:3o 2 11 t (( 6r3(-Poo 2 7. y;31-p®c 2. if n iloi-Tio S 2‘, . 5-Jo! .'t3o Z/ 2( e 7;31-sot y ,ZI?o 6-131 -6!oo 5- 26 f.. ot-v30 3 16Z 6 201- 6:30 / 2. I L / C ga / 7 9670 111 6:3(-1 60 2 (Olb y:31 -5!cc 2 / 0 % 7:p1-7:30 5 ,ZSfc 5ml -513o I Z O �o 141- 'co 2. lc& 5)31 -6:co 3 / 5"-- e t/ -2:30 y z 0 Ie 64-6;30 2. 1 0 l6 1 -I-co 2. /070 17 5 10 1,5-- 7 70 °45-g 2,/ o), J / / Cld/ L G 4Q �j b b f YS / 00; -1€:4 cZSI e 0Frs7-J0:9 ° S1 c 0.6,1-g8 �.e a2' /7 0 o:9-/CS W /7 003-1E:4 9 37 s 04-iS Ns 4‘oz 4 vft.ra:4 7,3, s-. Qc,,...,-/ei, vi 0 00.-416,-7 czi o QCth-9Q,* ? 4 Og—09.'1 Q(, / r ° tliir -Ye 7 ranf 1(6' hir EXHIBIT NO. / 0 ITEM NO. csw - 0 7? LET IF BE KNOWN BY THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES THAT THE TENDER YEARS CHILD CARE FACILITY IS NEEDED. IT HAS BECOME A PART OF THE WINDSOR COMMUNITY AND IS STRIVING TO BECOME ' A MUCH NEEDED PART OF THE RENTON COMMUNITY. WITH GROWTH AS AN ISSUE WE NEED MORE QUALITY FACILITIES FOR OUR CHILDREN. WE CAN DEPEND ON TENDER YEARS TO PROVIDE OUR CHILDREN WITH PROFESSIONAL CARE. NAME ADDRESS 1�VOTER Q REG# -U9-CaC0-I T56 1 0\V 4 Nz,DZ 10n€v,.sk r2eAcw, \ x-- * cnsozala0 6 ©O kk A,o t /,11)C • K!- 1:038'4 -3(01G 116 (0PP( lQfl f i-Ac& 299 '7 �,3V2o S .5 -"` • S 4 LI N 'tziusdr v f-S- ' n fie_ L gej /10-0 •24 . Sr-616c- r� a l5/5 5C 025WA 932 -3506 't-a iv -go 7/ P 0), 4 3 I a ,U d z L. i -,0- , 13ic Jo a5o E tk Eao7 aag-8acta/aa 33SS laWajt- irt_a_U):u 4511 40_,D,E)1 agio-C1Criq /& —c5 1(!' 4/0/2 34/0 N-t C� 4 2$// N� � ' ,/�D(o Z �471 wA) 7�os-d �77-v`44E6 11 -R)-01_1),Itte agog fra I .qi s % �� 226-6.2Z 3 (�O^Z 4415 1c 5—S-I-i 1L 103 �,� RIAA44, i ast,yv, t\ zig sO3 _ 4A),4 mo • la&Le LET IF BE KNOWN BY THE FOLLOWING SIGN-ATU.RES:.. T_HAT THE TENDER YEARS CHILD CARE FACILITY IS NEEDED. IT HAS BECOME A PART OF THE WINDSOR COMMUNITY AND IS STRIVING TO BECOME A MUCH NEEDED PART OF THE RENTON COMMUNITY. WITH GROWTH AS AN ISSUE WE NEED MORE QUALITY FACILITIES FOR OUR CHILDREN. WE CAN DEPEND ON TENDER YEARS TO PROVIDE OUR CHILDREN WITH PROFESSIONAL CARE. NAME ADDRESS VOTER REG# ?�1©-1/ +'7 i K:- /6aryuer: .P..,0 q3// A)..F. S-14-57�4•/o a- 47/4,1 04- , al�o ` /). L►� U 555 kre. a.rfa Q i Aft e f©? -v� ® . cc�L , c _ _. i-j.-,I4 (.414/ q3/id. A.)E7 , �, / . a �L( / .4fi� / 7k/d //,,H Wei 1/3// ,VE -CO -1 OL-20/ - keiviton, OR VOZ z dr)/ fC ���/ Lc�i� l�'�1� Atr , It ' - . , .S-- t.�. 4_n_ ' ,,i cA/& _ -.S� gt / .RAI" $ 4 *' Pr M a J 622Z ,ss / 6.,4- r) -- I55q,c,w4 (,)z .9/W2.7 9 H tv S T f ( Sir- E3,:,Z fe_,21%,- N `7V .53- D," 41.?"2/2 4/0s- xe vh ' o*z._ ,..,4•At) . VA5-4 041.1.1 ��-C�.� 5-� r-�- -1-b �,ti ids (3`3 ?)t-f"RifclirrA 644 eutd7 , JA C C � �� ( ) i 0��. :��-�_ i 3 ) 0- ��- _/o • 'A 5 1-- eV:4-, sltika 0__'?_a_0,5- Raidth t4Ql , l ka.a. at p1 6), _ .ai_ v? a a�►" �� Jf LL s2i�2- n� `f764 d 1Ii\cLU \ � ULii 0,0d 44 /s IBC - 5) oil • ,Q t Y\, i 1 u��� - o` 33 44E o --\-cm LID ova5u • IBIT NO / — L EPA NO. a:'Ag '7 9® e9 November 20, 1989 f " • • Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator . Current Planning Division • Community Development Department Mr. Erickson: • My son, Keith, is enrolled in the Tender Years Daycare Center in the Renton Highlands. The director of the Center has asked the parents of the children en"rolled to let you know what we think of our daycare situation. Briefly, I am a single mother of one. I divorced my husband one year ago. I work in Kirkland and my son attended a daycare next door to my office until nine months ago when their lease was not renewed. I had three weeks notice to findracdaycare my 22 year old and I approved of. I wanted to keep him in Kirkland with me, but I couldn't find a decent, affordable daycare in the area. So, I spent two weeks calling and visiting the Renton-area daycare centers. I called about twenty Centers, and visited ten of them. -Half of these I considered "adequate" but not good enough to give my son the feeling of self-worth that he will need in his life to succeed. A daycare is not just a place to drop your child off while you work - it is the place where they spend the maj- ority of the time when you work full-time like I do. The place where they receive the majority of their social skills. I wanted a Center that was staffed with people that would help my son through his different stages of development; net-Just babysit him. This may seem like a rote statement,-but Keith has been through a lot in his short life (divorce, moving away from his dad, having his dad never see him, etc. -- along with the trials and tribu- lations all children go through i.e. sharing, fighting, learning:of manners, etc.) and I wanted to be certain he was in an environment that would work with me in fostering healthy development in2-iim.: When I decided to try the apartments daycare center, I was first impressed by how new it was. When Keith walked into Tender. Years he spent about two minutes close by me and then he-was off playing. He's pretty shy and I was surprised at how quickly he felt comfortable. When I walked into the Center, I could tell that whoever was responsible for turning some walls and floor space into a "kid's place" liked kids. Bright rooms, lots of cabinet space for toys, bright carpeting, chalk- boards, brilliantly painted murals, closets stuffed with craft supplies, a fenced cement deck and riding toys. None of these items makes a daycare"'acgreaf place to be, but it does show that the people responsible for the daycare care about kids. There was a lot of thought put into children's wants and needs. Fu ii • On Keith's first day there was very few students enrolled, so there was_alsmaller staff then. As;itheircentollment:has increased, so has their staff. I feel very comfortable that my son gets more than adequate attention while he is there. • I have never seen such a caring, Supportive group of peoiYe in a daycare before. Many of my friends and acquaintances have children in other` Centers and I never hear-them rave about how pleased they are as I do. For the amount of money that child care professionals make, they either Love work- ing with kids or thay have an alterior motive. I believe that most Home=Care is Centers:T.are.no.tcset up for the child's benefit but for the operator to have a way of 'making money while staying at home with their own children. I want my son to be' nurtured while I am at work - not just babysat. The Tender Years staff has met every testing situation (and with a divorce and two moves my son has endured, there have been quite a few) with Keith with a prof- essional attitude that shows their experience in child care, and a caring attitude that proves their knowledge of making a child feel special while teaching him society's boundaries. One thing that I really appreciate, is that if they notice a change in Keith's behavior they let me know, AND keep me updated on his progress in this area,so -lcknow if the different methods I am using to deal with this behavior change are working. This is very important and.-proves to me their cooperative effort. • Nine months ago I made a thorough check of the area and could not find a Daycare better than Tender Years. I do not believe I could now, either. I would hate to take my son out of ancatmosphere where he has excelled thanks to the efforts of the Tender Years staff because they cannot afford to operate on the amount of in-house daycare needed.by the apartment complex. Sincerely, Ms. Leiker 4 ttirt a aeae�e t . m. Dees Vatent,lief at all ct`ilaaepQle " things s 1t is oot eePeet a Wive a to 4tov'de these d e Strive api�g love soil r�ngh themselves 'Le eaY ncos esvlotatioe pet ene err 1t is We n s se l",mot sil esv't to prba4en while • et► »� >s vos Ch'atevicle eQa�S ut'h,a ,WewiU to n lOnoosf v entreating,Vas y voes chiea to you *ill `ehty apt quest' ay of ,wank y°st 1 00e a y Vobl a site t concern cle we do pot ee to&av�a them pot th he it1-1 hest ono aka Itee to of the(tauten in the to Seel �etnhet a vow(cb ��e y°o an is�hpo11 cam' ,mast Yea welcon'e to TENDER YEARS SCHOOL Parent's Handbook ►d w TENDER YEARS SCHOOLS I '- ,,,,, Sill,,, w. of the world around us.We offer a variety of creative and *Other Services: learning activities in a consecutive way,so that each expe- rience builds on previous ones.We also offer many experi- The center,which is fully insured,also has a large variety of enrichment activities ences with small groups,storytime and free play,indoors available on an optional basis to children ages 3 years and up.These activities and out,for development of large muscles.Group singing, include such things as music instruction,swimming lessons,cooking classes, m show and tell,and special holiday parties are also part of gymnastics, foreign language instruction,and computers.A"sports camp"program T our program. is available from June through August at some sites. /�d Experiences are provided for all of our children to develop m their ability to walk,run,climb,push,pull,jump,roll, Before and After School Care: slide,throw,catch,hit,dig,lift,and carry. The before and after school program is designed to provide a combination of PLEASE CHECK Daily for your child's take-home papers supervised enrichment activities and creative play.Enrichment options include or projects.They have worked very hard on their"projects" such things as music lessons,computers,crafts, drama,and swimming. ` , and it is important to your child that you praise their rn work.Sometimes in the excitement of leaving,the work Cn gets left behind.Please,for the sake of your child,make this a part of your daily pick-up routine. Evening and Saturday Care (available at some sites): Affordable,licensed and fully insured evening and Saturday care is available. General Policies: The evening program serves children,four weeks through twelve years,from 6:30 pm through closing.The evening program serves dinner(procided by parents)and offers a combination of structured activities and free play.All children are in bed no later than 9:00 PM.Staff will provide academic tutoring and enrichment learning Discipline: throughout the evening. Discipline will be based on an understanding of the individual child's needs and stage of development.It shall The Saturday program is available from 9:00 AM to midnight and is staffed to be designed to help the child develop inner control, provide learning skills,free play,crafts and music. acceptable behavior, and respect for the rights of others. Punishment will be related to the child's offense and will Both Saturday and evening programs will accept pre-registered drop-ins. be administered only by Tender Years faculty. Cruel or unusual punishment will NOT be administered.A copy of the discipline policy is contained in the registration packet. The center reserves the right to terminate,without notice, Sports Camp (available at some sites): any child who endangers himself or any member of the The summer sports camp is designed for children entering Kindergarten through school community. 12 years.It offers soccer, swimming,tennis/racquetball,music,crafts,and comput- ers. Financial Policies: All water activities are supervised by Red Cross certified lifeguards. These are set forth in detail in the financial policies V contained within the registration packet.The following summary highlights the most frequently asked questions. Payment due date:There is flexibility in the due dates and this will be established with the center director at the time of enrollment.All late charges,etc.will be calculated based upon this understanding. * Optional enrichment classes offered will be chosen by the parent group of each School. NOTES Welcome to Tender Years School! Purpose: The purpose of Tender Years School is to serve the community by providing care and learning in a loving, happy,and secure atmosphere.We strive to meet the emotional,physical,social,and educational needs of each child entrusted to our care.We hope in some small way to help your child develop into a well-rounded individual with a positive self-esteem. T Our services are provided to all persons regardless of sex, O race,color,national origin or sensory or developmental disability. General Admission Requirements and Enrollment Procedures: O • We are licensed and accredited by the State Z of Washington. • We provide services for children ages 4 weeks to 12 years of age. • Children enrolled normally will not be scheduled to attend more than ten(10) hours per day on a regular basis. ADMISSION REQUIRES THAT WE HAVE INFORMA- TION ABOUT THE PARENT,AS WELL AS THE CHILD. THE FOLLOWING FORMS CONTAINED IN THE REG- ISTRATION PACKET MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT,SIGNED AND KEPT UP TO DATE. 1. Student Information Form 2. Immunization Record 3. Health Questionaire 4. Physicians'Report 5. Financial Application 6. Financial Policy Form 7. Discipline Policy Program/Curriculum Goals: The curriculum provides expe_r�rien es_b thr development of sensory awareness and discrimination,language skills, eye-hand coordination, ability to manipulate different kinds of materials,creativity,problem solving skills, willingness to discover and try new things,and awareness 9. Nap Time and Sanitation: Infant/Toddler Program: Cots or mats are provided by the school.Each full-time .n child is assigned his/her own cot/mat.All children,under the age of five, are required to have a nap.(State licensing Ages 1 Month - 6 Months: requires this of us,so please do not ask us to keep your z child up.)A labeled blanket from home should be supplied All young infants will receive individualized care based on a daily each Monday morning and taken home for a laundering care plan designed at the time of enrollment and updated monthly. each Friday at pickup."Special"nap-time blankets may It is the goal of the center to care and nurture in a homelike commute to and from the center daily,ONLY if necessary. environment.Cuddles are encouraged!No baby will be fed by bottle propping.Every effort is being made to provide a joyful sensory stimulating infant room.Infants will be examined by a registered nurse or pediatrician once a month and those examina- 10. Food/Nutrition at School: tion results will be reported to you. A good diet is a vital part of your child's well being and development.We provide a nutritious breakfast,lunch, m and afternoon snack. Ages 6 Months - 12 Months: All older infants will receive individualized care,based on a daily • care plan,designed at the time of enrollment and updated monthly. /po 11. Staff Health and Safety Training: This age group will begin large muscle development with super- A) vised crawling,climbing, and manipulative play.Cuddles are All of our School staff members are required to have a Food continuously provided in a nurturing environment.The children Handling Permit and TB skin tests.All staff on duty will will be examined by a registered nurse,or pediatrician,once a V J also have CPR and First Aid Training. month. D 12. Birthdays: Ages 12 Months - 30 Months: The children enjoy celebrating birthdays.School will All toddlers will receive non-structured play time for a portion of supply cupcakes for your child should you desire.If you are each day,and structured group time for a portion of each day. planning to bring cupcakes from home for your child's There will be an ongoing effort to encourage large muscle coordina- party,please let the School staff know in advance. tion skills,and in addition,there will be a structured program for Generally,the birthday parties take place during the cognitive skills development;conducted in 2 one hour segments afternoon snack time at 2:30-2:45 PM. each day.Toilet training requires close cooperation between parents and staff as well as MANY changes of clothes on site each day. 13. Transportation/Field Trips: The School does not provide bus transportation for school- - Food Preparation: age children to or from school. All formula and baby foods are the responsibility of the parent(s) The local school district provides transportation to and and must be labeled with the child's name.The facility will provide from elementary school for this facility. hot lunches when the children are ready for table food.All food allergies and religious preferences are posted for the staff. Supply Field trips outside of the School are provided,but usually at least 4 labeled bottles per day. are within walking distance.A signed parental consent form for each field trip will be required of you in the event of an outing. Diapers and Wipes: Disposable diapers and wipes are supplied by the parents.They are labeled and stored in your child's cubby area.This facility requires a minimum of 6 diapers per day.If it is necessary to use Tender Year's diaper supply,you will be charged 50v per diaper. Crib Bedding: 5. Toys from Home/Show and Tell: Each parent of an infant is expected to supply the following each Toys brought from home are often broken or lost at School. Monday morning,and pickup for laundering each Friday afternoon To avoid this,we ask that you(please)send no toys with the following items: your child,except on Show and Tell Days.Some nature o je ,a vacs ion m , tc.arc all 2 labeled crib sheets appropriate items for Show and Tell.(Visitation of pets 2 labeled crib blankets must be pre-arranged with teachers.)Objects from home not more than 2 washable crib toys will be placed in your child's cubby after morning show and tell.It is helpful to have your child's show and tell in a Crib mobiles may be left up and will be disinfected by staff. paper bag with his/her name on the outside. Changes of Clothing: 6. Health Policies Concerning Illness: Send enough(at least 3 full changes)to survive even the wettest of • If your child is too ill to participate in the days. full daily program,he is too ill to be brought to school. • Do not bring your child if he/she has a fever, sore throat,vomiting, diarrhea,or a commu- nicable skin rash.Please let the School know before 9:00 AM if your child will not be in due to illness. • If your child is too ill to attend public school (school age children),then he/she also will be considered too ill to attend School. • If your child becomes ill while at the School, we will isolate him/her in the sick bay area. You will be called to come at once to get your child.Any child with a temperature of 100 °F,or more,is considered ill,and you will be notified. 7. Medications: We will give only medications that have a physician's prescription label,and with a signed permission slip from you.(Available at School).This must be signed and dated daily for medication.Medication which has become outdated will not be dispensed. 8. Emergency: Should your child have any injury at the School which requires medical attention,the following procedure will be used: 1. Provide for,or secure,immediate first aid. 2. Notify parents(or person to be called)in case of emergency. 3. Call ambulance in extreme emergency. Health Policies/Nutrition: Preschool The problem of communicable disease is prevalent among Our preschool program has been designed with the help of national experts m young people.Tender Years School is no exception.The in the field of early childhood education to provide your child with health and medication procedures recommended by the abundant opportunities for cognitive,motordevelop- Washington Department of Health are followed in thissensory,and social A facility. meat.We arreesenso very proud of our program and look forward to your corn- ` ) ments and suggestions as we strive to provide excellence in education. Our menus are reviewed by a nutritionist and exceed the O minimum state requirements. Preschool Subject Calendar: 0 r Parent Helps: September: I Like Myself 1. I'm Special,I'm Me! 2. School Please help us in the following ways: 3. Feelings 4. Family 1. Sign In & Out October: Our Senses Parents,or legal guardians,are required to sign their child 1. Our Bodies in and out of School every day.Children will not be allowed 2. Eyes and Ears to enter,or leave,the School by themselves.Persons under 3. Touch 4, Taste and Smell 18 cannot sign for children. November:Health and Nutrition 12. Extra Clothes at School: F. Where food comes from 2. Healthy Foods Bring a change of clothes with your child's name clearly 3. Grocery Store marked on them,to be stored in his/her cubby in case of an 4. Thanksgiving accident.If clothes have not been brought and an accident December:Around the World occurs,it will be necessary for us to call you to come and get your child.All clothing,including coats,should be — 1. African marked with your child's name on it. 2. Hispanic 3. American 4. Asian 3. School Attire and Coats: January: Space and Time Please dress your child in clothes he/she can manage 1. Seasons without help.Clothing should be appropriate for play, 2. Months of the Year creative activities and the weather.(Sometimes we get 3. Days of the Week involved in projects that are a bit"messy".) 4. Telling Time/Clocks February: Community Helpers 4. Outdoor Play: 1. Doctor/Nurse/Dentist 2. Letter Carriers/Valentine/Bakers We are required as a licensed School to provide activities 3. Police/Firefighters which will exercise the children's large muscles.Weather 4. Library/My Country permitting,we take the children outdoors at least once a day.If your child is well enough to attend the School,he/ she is normally well enough to participate in all activities indoors and out. March: Transportation Late Pickup Policy: 1. Boats The day program of the school closes at 6:30 pm.There will 2. Planes be a late charge of$5.00 for each 15 minutes(or portion 3. Animals thereof)that you are late.This charge is payable THAT 4. WheeIed Vehicles EVENING TO THE TEACHER ON DUTY.The school April:Living Things must be notified by 5 pm each day if you will require evening care.Without that notification,the late pickup 1. Domestic Animals fees will apply.A telephone call will save money. 2. Wild Animals 3. Food Plants 4. Plants and Trees Safe Pickup Policy: May: Domestic/Mother's Day i No child will be released to anyone but the custodial 1. Clean Up Time parent without written authorization from the custodial 2. Mother's Day parent. 3. Cooking/Baking 4. Farm Life If the responsible adult picking up the child appears unable to properly care for the child(e.g.,intoxication, June:More Living Things substance abuse),it may be necessary for the staff to follow procedures for such an event. 1. Birds 2. Insects 3. Dinosaurs/Reptiles 4. Sealife Termination policy: July: Summer Time Tender Years reserves the right to terminate(or place your child's name on a waiting list)any child who has been 1. Beach/Picnics absent for two weeks,wherein the parents have not 2. Circus! previously notified the staff of vacation,illness,or some 3. Vacation In addition,children will learn other reason for the absence. 4. Sink/Float alphabet,numbers,colors,and shapes.Subjects will be adjusted We also require a paid two(2)week notification of August: — and altered to appropriate age termination if you plan to withdraw your child from the level school. 1. Hot/Cold 2. Soft/Hard 3. Sharp/Dull 4. Same/Different Absences: Daily Schedule: Please call the facility by 9:00 AM if your child will be absent.Parents must pre-arrange leaves or vacations. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Parents withdrawing the child for one(1)month or more 6:30-8:30 Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Y' cannot be guaranteed an opening when they return. 8:30-9:00 Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play Creative Play 9:00-9:30 Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts 9:30-10:15 Art Art Art Art Art 10:15-11:00 Math Skills Science Math Skills Science Math Skills Holidays: 11:00-11:30 Music Music Music Music Rythym , 11:30-12:15 Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch The center will be closed:New Year's Day,Martin Luther 12:15-12:30 Story Story Story Story Story King,Jr.Day,President's Day,Memorial Day,Independ- 12:30-2:30 Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time Rest Time once Day,Labor Day,Thanksgiving,and Christmas. 2:30-2:45 Snack Snack Snack Snack Snack 2:45-4:00 Active Play Active Play Active Play Active Play Active Play 4:00-4:30 Games 'Drama Gymnastics Games Table Activ. 4:30-6:30 Free Play Free Play Free Play Free Play Free Play &Table Activ. •For four and five year olds only. . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL,.CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-079-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT TITLE: 4310 Building A - Four Unit Apartment Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to convert an on-site day care center for residents' children to a four unit apartment building. Existing parking and other on-site amenities are sufficient to accommodate the additional number of units proposed. Conversion is sought because day care center is undersubscribed. Applicant has submitted a request to permit a commercial day care center, in the event that the proposed conversion is disalloWa by staff. LOCATION: 4310 N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 0 ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 0 ° 0 0 4 . Plants ° O ° 0 5. Animals ° O O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 O O 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 0 0 o O O 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare 0 O O 12 . Recreation 0 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 0 ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° 0 0 16. Utilities 0 00MMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-079-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 079-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT TITLE: 4310 Building A -- Four Unit Apartment Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to convert an on-site day care center for residents' children to a four unit apartment building. Existing parking and other on-site amenities are sufficient to accommodate the additional number of units proposed. Conversion is sought because day care center is undersubscribed. Applicant has submitted a request to permit a commercial day care center, in the event that the proposed conversion is disallovfd by staff. LOCATION: 4310 N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 . . •_ . OF i4, „ • i • ' '..i* +,, ::- .,... •''' ''''--'''''''''' .:: ''k'''.1'T:,, 6 0 4.- z 1 4;, :ig.4 •,:e' -— — • , ,,,,...) n.•;:,-;„. • -t- iall, G cn '•ii. 0 ,! :;.:i I•'?::::,. ..5 . ) '' H, ..! :: i,iV.;''•.' • 0 . •05 . . SE PI City of Renton• Land Use Hearing Examiner • . , • will hold a . • , . . . . .. . ,. . i...,...., . - ,,, in. „ '''Iri;' . '•*',„ • 1 • 0* 4 00 .,3'• is:ii r..', , _ , • .. . . . • i ARING . .. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY . HALL . .. „ . .. DECEMBER 12 , 1989 ON BEGINNING AT 9 :°°. A.M. PoNAi.' ,.... , _ ir . . . • .: •CC:311NICE- - A4T , ,„•, -- , .. . . • WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE . EC '; CU-072-89 . • APPLICANT IS SEEKING. A NEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND EXISTING DARE CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN OF RESIDENTS/EMPLOYEES. ; • • IN ORDER TO SERVE COMMUNITY RESIDENTS. ..... .1.• '. 2C•• • I •,,,L , . .. : , rt _1111 i 1 li'3-7.90*\-) 7. -91 7 \i .147“ ' , • , --'---°- i. 1 r il'k?:"\i" IIG.,--^1kt?...t.'i,l,Dtvl 1.T1111.,11.'"'.'.A,-n,1.::-.1.1rV4,,(14,,yc...?ta.'.-.:s1-,I'`.C.",":-" .;I-•"-T':14 I'3. 1I., • ‘\:4-;-:„sI-\1\:411;I,' . :0',,-•„• ,,,„,_,. .0,,ti, r„f„„-:,.4..• AQUA: , . L • . — - IT 0 . 'i _ 7i 4.1 I,\N tr• X\\O l I, i F.71 • & II t 1 v I • . 1 .. ii„, „ ,_i _ . 710 .•2__,t.t._ • .1- . ,7 K “ rm ti- ' 1 -1 --1 "it-----41L :• It It . . -- \--—; ._::...k7i .' • ".:1I-1. ;,17, :i 1:9. LI"i....-A IL-1,11F•-ii., -:--••-•—•:k;It . 1-1 — - ..1._ A ' t i q— . 1 -• ,....:. : rf.:,;"' ' 4'4 3 .P., ; •• 9 . . . ,t1 . s:-, • ...,,„12 , t -tttr I t-,1.--:, . _ , _i; -vret, . I 1 • , I i I 1. , _ 7 . "1-1t1.__I V- I\ ?)., A!,,..cd .,,., %L' . 1- — x •-11. I IN 1.: v , A • ''. Itai i . • Pret .1: ' I IL. I v ' I' • Nit• , .. • li p...„iiii:t; • • ' I: r X7-1.j„- zuk i -'7 , i • n . I '",,„, 61 TO 11 * • 11-"I'll IstA'.1 Ill . I • •. • k( rKi ..0-, - I i 1 i I ^I*. •'ji ,r47<,V.:-T et_ ..‘" - — ,-416 — I.1 -'—lc":"--——— I' 12——f"- • ——t"———— -— • • & ,., i. 1I ,-.1 r•,...-.1 1___txri It i "- . ,f ..-. ' V . 11,4,1,+,4,: . . .1S1 .. 1 ----.1 • . 1 n r7tr. attpi it I .e•.: /i 11 •• • 1" •imIT.,7. I ra „,„i „ v. . .1 .. ,--,,- .-4..1 - ..=::,. vk_..- _ '1Yrt;- I , .n_l_ ^ I •• " 'RC •..•• 7 ql 1 ct, i A_Jni_JJ - , • "-Ike•,...ri P R 0 J E C T '4.t,k it 1 1 w '-tit ii I i. tixte._ • 1 I 1 '4. 2 1 I •• • ii l'__Am ,t . ,_K. rrrrr 1. e b ••• ulitn ._L -it ...,.., 1E4 1 • I a-)".- ;:'`-''''—':::,-'''.':: J6 ! • ' 05 ! ' 1 --7'--r.".:.:.__ ii.'4 r":iii... :::: _ •..._ _'.-1'7 . „,...,. • \,1.,,,,,,,si , ., " 4 '1 4 it,•/:`.(VIr inm_rt : I! 1 a tat,P% i 1'17 ...-- , • , I.. •j‘ ." _—• .' 4. -k-N--),),11'. I-,1•.• •:1-.' • 1 , .„. .Liu F. .. " •__-- --''4 - kt .V .x 13,4.11? :----------2._ • • ; ''. 41•••••. t,;• .:. 1 I twEl--1. ' I st t•1- wicl'itt"" ' %;(11 ; II til•-t 1 , • .1...A.1440..•. ' 71r1f, -11,1;.I.,b,lit'.... • . ... 4 E kl . .1-'6 .‘I t L A. .. '• ''' IL..--.. 1 It"4Arif. . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS! I . PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 4310 BUILDING "X",•1 tt.E. 5TH STkEET. • ' - : I . ; • i . : 1 . , .FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF REN'tON .H: • . • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235 -28i3 • TI-11S No-rice Narr • TO .BE . REMOVED.. WITHOUT' ROPE7•!: AUTHORIZATION i . . • OF R . (— ' • ,---- . . . . , .. „ . .. „ . . . . :• . ., A - • ' .-''''' s. 4. . . : 0 , . . '•;:k-,:, ',,,, ci %,4 ,Arik ..., ,.... , . . • ,, • ....•. • . . . -. 'i;Pi.t:::Vf -%P,"'NW '''' 1,, , ;, , 1 , • , ••: .:- - ....., . . . . , . . • - . :-. . • ',Fr:..,',....1 % ....,. er • • . . e. . . , .. . 447-ec sErl°'#. . • .• : .1 • . . . . . , • . . • .,;•'•,-. . . , . . . , . • , . . .. . , . City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . . . . • .. , . :: . ,•• , • ;,...:::!.:. . ,. will 'hold a • .. •1 . . . .,,.f.,1. ..• .. • . PUBLIC ' HEARING ... . . . . • •.•,. . . . . .1,4.0.. •. . • ,i.;...in • • , . . • . . • . . , . .,..„....1 . in . • . • • • . .. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 1 . . . • , ON DECEMBER 12, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9:0A.M. P.M. . . • .. . . . . . CONCERNING: • ...: : • . . . ... . . . t , • • • ••• . . ..• ' •• I WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE ECF; CU-072—p9 , . 1 ,• , .1 APPLICANT IS SEEKING A NEW CONDITIONAL USE:pPERMIT TO EXPAND EXISTING DAY CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN OF'RESIDENTS/EMPLOYEES IN . i ORDER TO SERVE, COMMUNITY RESIDENTS.' • • 4111 1 w.4i.3 ;7:: i! --kn --,-, -..,.—7--r• - 7------NI - --- - ,, . • , " • E ' IL ' 4. 1.. • •' i • • 4 ch.,A, '• • ii ' I 1,-F- „. ii iiimi IT • • r••, ' : . .., ,..r., ....._ ,! •. tc' )1-0, 1171 0 • . • r .-„,,,,-.z...1! r-,, .....-P,I, , ,, -k\-.., lb - 0--- 1 N.,. 4-1'11--u- z. ,'•114\JCOALEIA ,• . • i i . • .' ''. .; -:;xi- • -144:tf.,111. . ' -41-& ,,,,..7jc,:lii 1%17",;,,, „/ -c'E...5 ' , , -'• ,...,-; I ‘11 g— • . . ___21_._10 If ,•,,, • ••"-, OM ix . ' 7 Tr . r .. ._____ _____ , tdhE . •- .,,. . jr-63 „.....,,,; in;;11! , l',..1,:...... .-1Z..: e -JO 741 , Lte __ _ : . • .0.7) ! ;4-, • :tr.; fr?O'• . '21 " 1.7.ii: . - lit'-'--7. A 3' . I .1 . \r- • • : , •,,,,• - t M.:7•• f II* ••:, .4wo . I I I I ' / - • ' .--‘.--: • .. ' t.:4 '.!-i'!:•! , ”.. - .., ... ' Imn.... I i • ' -• . I ..1j.Wir•.:t.' 1;1-LN ) . ... ..71:: I ' i . .. r I ....447...,, . . • • .,:••!4:7. Urft : I ' /....•• hik:2 -1. v 'jk" :il-imur 1 .ii . • . i . .0. -t•Y:1,4.1'.'.,N,---. RNTO,..Sa IT . .i--t. a-42s1 . .-- - ., -_ _.., JIL_____ ___ . ,. , •• . .,. . i ..,•••••• , - . ,1 " UM ILL. 4..«0 . , - al., " I . . . 14' .." : . . rt. .,2-0' . 1 . 1 • . .. • ., — , , • . • 4 ......4.P.- ,.•r- yet, At S 1 • . f'•,4 Ire; ::. . -,----4.0,,-,•Os+.0...'' ; . ----.r0R, • 'l..i ,,,,, . • . . 1 ri li ° ..g.i., t I. .. p.....1 , . o i ' SITE. 1 . • • , . Tz'" i , ,v) .1 '.4. s- 1 t . , . ." - i,' •!---7,..." '-i.-,-7--------'6-11-----7. -73' .: , . -'''' __•L"':. •"iir't 4... ..-- . _x .,.:.:•:;• ,,..' - X1 .... y.1,,, . k 1 • • ' 19 "1 ii.4:',,k gri_E, i ai ' illt ot.1 1 .V. I . . .. .1( '. o. .1% 14 .T1 1.•.,,,,,,,t.ci;1 1 rm. gi i 1_21,1, .t i 1 -":7 I • • ..•!,!..1 ...... ,, .--,..„, ,-,...-...1- T • ,.. : r-• I ur.or ' •\r o"...i..,r tr? ' ••;,:'.. 1 :--------.... - • • • ';': :1•*.; :'._ .;I 1 .....„... 1:2 1 1 '4 .. Z.'"4 4' : Paitir:. I MK' • . . L. . . ..,. ....,„., :....v.:-..e...•. • • ,0 ,,,. • ,I,I,.I I.jd./:....• ) .. •••,. •; g _ . • .1GENERAL LOCATION AND DR — . . . :s.-- „, PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 4310 BUILDING "X", N.E. 5TH STREET. . . • .• i • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • :...___ PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 . . • •• • • ' ii .::...THIB NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT ,. • Q,..';,.. :.:.:,,,f • PROPER AUTHORIZATION . . - . CERTIFICATION . . • I , M a.Y.cj akv e Lk. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 .. . COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN S CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON //` 30 —5 7 • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ! .. residing inr-Rt \..) .) , on the 3s1A SIGNED : Ma4.4., fetdejet.- day of iI -0, vner , . OF I? 1,114 ... • • .- • !,:',,,',4:11,. • f.„, sclik ,; .? ' , •.., ' .;: ,O ' (c, , .i I;,V. 47-'4.0 sepleoe, City•%;;1.::i'-'11 ty of Rehton Land Use Hearing Examiner h':.,,,,,.......9 will hold a , INO . . mm 1',N14f1. Iikly , 1 :1;::,-•;-d1 . ' - „ • •. ,.,..•,, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS1v• OITY HALL .. . ON DECEMBER 12, . 1988 BEGINNING AT 9: °A.M. P.M® ;,. .,, CONCERNING: . . . : . WINDSOR PLACE DAY CARE S i','- 1 ECF; CU-072-89 APPLICANT IS SEEKING A NEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND .,,:,, ? EXISTING DAY CARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN OF RESIDENTS/EMPLOYEES IN ORDER TO SERVE COMMUNITY RESIDENTS, .vf '- 1 1114'T4:74,-3/4 „Til,„ 7,.." ....II i-— It—•.y:,:,--t-L ^.7—•'—'1:-.••----r - - : ...-_ _____ _, , lug_ 1LN ...1; •; it .,,:• ' t• P • 1 -' i•\ f•:,;' : , : '1 I_ ,,,, '••:•-::ti. 11 i 1"^ 4:• .4• of • ot x ' li KT 1 I Ts ; .- .,,. iii 1 e 1 \ . •-r* ,— IL! . .,..,- # ... ,. . .1 fur.%.4-4 •.2. if $00". • '5 111:11 '"1" Nik... .lti- i Ilml..:....w-tIt_ii6a ..., *1:71.tit,\Xr\O___AlAr.jit 4 ' I 1- I MN 14• 3 ,t1; I I Inn+; 4 I w 110411 li I '4 \'55 1 - 4 14---. '• i 1 * Zill ,,,,.„. ',.,... I__ 01),1 rr 4.1 ;---. '' 1,, 4-1 . " . "--g ll r" r i. flir -..' f= t ' , . ! ———--Air -.•• ,_ _, ___ _ .... .:=7. 'i, f" ..:,, ... . I ?„ -- ,i.' . • ... ; ,..--, 6 ,, ... 11 ..._n_lia___-, • , . -,,, . 1, v., . N l'itr... AI* -... : VIM" . -'1 I I 14 NW's .../ I g • I ...• •7 Iv ,.. A ) P „,,, ., "" ,- 17,, : ....) 1 * - ' Arl % v "4"ii; ''' ' ... 19-- '' iv-I.:, .,, . 4.,. ., . . . . ,.. ,.,„.. #, . . • ..,,_, ... „.... • •87•11-tr - , -1 .f.$--'w1(`!"- lt VW :2, _oc,_.., _____ 11 4. 1 :' I :%1.1 I I.I•I I r p ;1 1!'n„ ini`' I nn-nn.• i . PIP. ,. utn--1-4-17, • , 0„ , . 1,::, ;.. •,. ,,, , ... - 1... .. . 1 ill s ' t" .• i:,• .• - :4 M I t ..• i. • wil? , . v • ' . _ ft. nv ix. % I * V 9 /4 'II , ',sr-—"i' -; -. 7.'"-•,,,„.' ; c -i - -4 4, tin: L. in..:r,. 1 f; ': l'i ...\ :P! '''"1•••‘••• • PROJECT .,-,..-..1 . 1 ., o, 1 - . , il .t.,,,,, l• Mita jt_..., e 1 , ,,. Iraq tioir g g t ?. i • ,,.....,„ SITE 1 q . a F 7 i ' 'IT d I I ; • 1.111 . r w pun A. i—ST 1H1" trw._._ I I i : — ..•• _41kNit_ .1.6g16_,_., _ ....._... — : ....imirifo: ,... .• :- ll.111.1 II /4 1)1•0 it I L.11......:..1 1- ._ ee• ., , ,,,, . 1.i Ihr nom•c 44:. : . t .. I,. 54( ,I ito:0 , ”t"I-2414, • t 01.,,tit 0 : fien•r• 4 :.. • 1(4, ..i 4. 1:4 14, • • . r,__Ini `Ns ,,,, 1---113*.i 1".1 r.•••—r ' "rn ' "itil"1 IP „...... r-- ., •• if ,- l/011 : er•Wttef. t;._ . .71r• 4N; ,.......r.tme. • # It . -•:•-- it---yr 1 ,.•••4%:•:•:i J ..144 : . 4 ' 'mea kl 3 a&rif i::1GENEFIAL LOCATION AND/ DR CI — ESS: !,u4, :5'7;•' ;; :.•'.'; PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 4310 BUILDING "X", N.E. 5TH STREET. . . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON '..' • •`••I , PLANNING DAVIZ10161 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ''. : , Lo :.: . 1► r ' eI f %s ° CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION January 23, 1989 Ms. Shirley Lapp Tender Years, Inc. 4311 N.E. 5th Street, #A Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Day Care Facility at Windsor Apartments 4311 N.E. 11th Street, #A Building Permit No. B-137O —, Conditional Use Permit NoJU-121-86 Dear Ms. Lapp: The Planning Division of the City's Community Development Department has recently become aware that children enrolled in the day care facility you operate at the above referenced Windsor Apartments are not all residents of the apartment complex. This is of concern to this office because when the project application was submitted and reviewed, by conditional use permit No.CU-121-86 (see attached report), the day care facility was conditionally approved by the City's Hearing Examiner with the following conditions: 1. The day care center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of the complex. 2. Outside play prior to 8:00 AM shall be kept to a minimum. As a result of the aforementioned conditions, it appears then that the day care center is in violation of the City's land use code because children from outside residences are enrolled. This situation must be corrected promptly. The building permit that this project was built under has been approved with a temporary 90 day occupancy (issued on December 9, 1988). Unless this apparent violation is corrected, we will be forced to close operation of the facility and will not be able to issue the final Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • • Ms. Shirley Lapp +; _ ' Tender Years, Inc. January 23, 1989 Page 2 • Primark Corporation is well aware of the conditions for the occupancy of the day care facility and was reminded of these conditions by City staff prior to the temporary certificate of occupancy being issued. The only way enrollment of children from outside of the apartment complex can he permitted in this facility (with the exception of employee's children) would be for a new conditional use permit application to be approved to allow its commercial use within the R-3 multi-family residential zone. Upon receipt of this letter, would you kindly respond to this office in writing and inform us as to the status of this matter. A prompt response from you will be appreciated. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator dke:jfl:lapp:dsk4 cc: Primark Corporation 1200 South 192nd , #102 Seattle, Washington 98148 • • THE LEITZKE ARCI-IITECIS It-�119-86, SA-120-86 &. CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 • Page 7 . .• • • 27. • In order to minimize confusion and assure that this condition is both clear and has been clearly satisfied, the plans will have to be modified and submitted back to this office within 30 days of this decision to allow for subsequent review. This condition may necessitate a reduction in the • number of units and that result is contemplated by this decision. • 28. The proposed phasing of the project is reasonable providing that all road improvements and recreational amenities are provided with the completion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION • • The City Council should approve the reclassification of the approximately 2.9 acres of property from G to R-3. DECISION • The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: • 1. The applicant will have to provide minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet to be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the. Safeway B-1 district. 2. The 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. The purpose of this landscaping shall be to minimize the visual intrusion of the shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to some extent the noises associated with the center. • 3. To supplement the buffer and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and the property line. 4. Staff and the applicant are left to determine whether access to the parking area for Buildings A and B can safely intersect the Bremerton right-of-way. 5. All plans shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department to assure safe emergency access, with the proviso that reduction of landscaping shall be kept to a minimum and that fire lanes, unless absolutely necessary, shall not be paved roads. The Conditional Use Permit for the daycare center is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The daycare center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of the complex. 2. Outside play prior to 8:00 A.M. shall be kept to a minimum. • The entire proposal remains subject to the conditions imposed by the ERC. • • ORDERED THIS 26th clay of May, 1987. • FRED J. KAUFMAN • - - IIEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED TIIIS 26th clay of May, 1987 to the parties of record: Steve Leitzke 19518 Pacific Highway South, Suite 202 Seattle, Washington 98188 TRANSMUTED THIS 26th day of May', 1987 to the following: ' -. Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke • Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission • if• • THE LEU ZKE ARCHITECTS .l'; R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121.-•86 • . • �' v May 26, 1987 � Page 7 ` :: i.4C;' t.,}., 27. • In order to minimize confusion and assure that this condition is both clear and has been clearly . . h satisfied, the plans will have to be modified and submitted back to this office within 30 davg of I'tl'.• this decision to allow for subsequent review. This condition•may necessitate a reduction in the v.. number of units and that result is contemplated by this decision. • } 14t 28. • The proposed phasing of the project is reasonable providing that all road improvements and ' fi . a�� recreational amenities are provided with the completion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION .€•. r: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the approximately 2.9 acres of property ' ' from G to R-3. • . • DECISION . • The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: • 1. The applicant will have to provide minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet to be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the " • Safeway I1-1 district. • • 2. The 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. The purpose of this landscaping shall be to • minimize the visual intrusion of the shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to • • some extent the noises associated with the center. . 3. To supplement the buffer and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and ' the property line. • • 4. Staff and the applicant are left to determine whether access to the parking area for • t• Buildings A and 13 can safely intersect the Bremerton right-of-way. 5. All plans shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department to assure safe • emergency access, with the proviso that reduction of landscaping shall be kept to a minimum • and that fire lanes, unless absolutely necessary, shall not be paved roads. • • • The Conditional Use Permit for the daycare center is approved subject to the-following conditions: 1. The daycare center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of the , complex. 2. Outside play prior to 8:00 A.M. 'shall be kept to a minimum. • • The entire proposal remains subject to the conditions imposed by the ERC. • • • ORDERED TIIIS 26th day of May, 1987. • • • _• ' FRED J. KAUFMAN .UIEAR1NG EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of May, 1987 to the parties of•record:. • . Steve Leitzke • 19518 Pacific highway South, Suite 202 Seattle, Washington 98188 • TRANSMTT"TED THIIS 26th day of.May, 1987 to the following: . Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch • Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director • • Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 Windsor Place Apartments The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision • or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner; dated 26, 1987' . 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name:The Leitzke Architects Name: . Address: 19550 Pac. Hwy. S., #203 Address: Seattle,WA 98188 Telephone No. 824-0992 Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets' .if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal . is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted- in the Examiner' s Report) - No. 18 Error: glr 1-I - a. Ife,0 Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error:- Correction: OTHER: ON SISSY /- No. ' Error: [� GiV CU�Sa.„4 C - ( � za-3 ` Correction: - 7 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council iS requested to grant the following relief : (Attach explanation,, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendatio1-1 and grant the following relief: Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Sc cf .Lr{-tb c H v p Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows : _ . Ap-- . jet.. , . 4akr , (ro/3/8 ) Appellant/R- .resentative Signatur Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. JUN 3' 1987,- rffi . .csiv cims;'s e �. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS L[ 't ETU'` FINDINGS OF FACT No. 18 Correction: I concur with the examiner regarding the unfortunate proximity of the apartment complex and the Safeway rear walls and delivery bays. Upon further inspection of the two properties I determined that the apartment complex is setback approximately 5-7 ' from the property line. The Safeway complex appears to be setback less than 10 ' from the property line. In addition, it appears as though the required 10 ' landscaping strip is further reduced as one approaches Union Street. Under current building regulations the B-i use would require a 15 ' landscape setback adjacent to the common boundary of a residential lot. The residential zoned lot to the north of the Safeway would require a minimum 12 ' setback. the minimum separation under current code considerations would then be approximately 27 ' , rather than the approximately 15 ' that exists. In view of these facts and the existence .of the site plan review process it is highly unlikely that a similar situation could occur. Our proposal varies greatly from this existing condition in that we are proposing 25 ' setbacks to be landscaped. We feel that associating the Primark project with this unfortunate and extreme situation is unfair and prejudicial. CONCLUSIONS No. 3 Error: The Examiner mentions the Safeway B-1 district on numerous occasions in this report. Correction: I would merely like to clarify that there is no common property line between the Safeway store and the subject property. All adjacent B-1 zoned property adjacent to the subject site is currently undeveloped. OTHER No. 8 Clarification: The Safeway store complex is located at least 400 ' West of the western edge of the sites main parcel and approximately 200 ' West of the parcel proposed for rezoning. No. 16 Error: While we generally agree with the Examiner' s concern regarding the proposed project and future development on the B-1 zone, we feel the imposition of a 50 ' setback requirement on the existing and proposed R-3 zoned property is excessive and. in error for the following reasons: 1. The ruling is unequitable for two reasons. First, a multifamily project currently being constructed West of Union Avenue on 4th Street by Centron Corporation has sideyard setbacks ranging from 12 ' to 25 ' . As in the subject property it is adjacent to B-1 zoned property. Secondly, the mitigation of any perceived visual and noise impacts should be born equitably by the two adjacent property owners, rather than be born by the first Owner to develop their property. This is particularly true in this instance where the noise and visual impacts would be generated primarily by the commercial zone. 2 . The imposition of the 50 ', setback requirement would put an undue financial hardship on the property owner. A major modification of the "approved" site plan would be required, resulting in the loss of approximately 20 apartment units and the daycare center. In monetary terms this translates into a property devaluation of approximately $5 , 000 per unit or $100 , 000, further impacting the economic viability of a project required to provide extensive road improvements and utility extensions. 3 . The 50 ' setback requirement is quadruple the required setback under underlining zoning requirements. We feel this setback is arbitrary and prejudicially influenced by the unfortunate condition which exists at the boundary of the Safeway and adjacent residential development, and which has been pointedly referred to throughout the report. It could be argued that a building setback of 25 ' adjacent to B-1 developed property would give no less noise protection than a 20 ' setback adjacent to any busy residential street in the City of Renton. We agree with the Examiner' s condition that a 6 ' high fence be constructed along the adjacent B-1 zoning property. line and also that a landscape buffer 10 'wide be installed along the aforementioned property lines. We would propose to increase the width, height, and/or density of this buffer as necessary and as the Council sees fit in order to mitigate any perceived impacts from the adjacent B-1 zoning. It is reasonable to assume that portions of the B-1 zoned site will be developed with areas of parking, buildings, and service areas. Historically, we would find that the parking areas would be located toward the street frontage with the buildings placed to the rear of the site. The service areas would then be located at the ends of the buildings or at the rear of the buildings. In my opinion the only area which would have a significant impact on the adjacent multifamily development would be a garbage pickup area which could be located somewhere along the 1,000 lineal feet of adjacent property line. Regardless of where it might be located, a setback increase from 25 ' to 50 ' in and of itself would not produce a significant decrease in noise impacts upon the apartment complex. 3 . Summary of Action Requested: Modify the conditions of the report reducing setback to 25 ' . In summation we feel that the 50 ' setback is unfair and without precedence. We would propose to modify our project as follows: The natural slope of the ground is such that the adjacent building will likely be from 5 ' -7 ' and possibly a greater distance in elevation lower than the apartment units. We would propose to further emphasize this grade change by creating earth berms along the adjacent property lines. This would aid in deflecting airborne noise. The 6 ' high fence would be constructed as proposed by the examiner. The 10 ' of dense Evergreen foliage proposed by the Examiner would be increased to 12 ' -15 ' . The landscaping proposed would be larger caliper evergreen trees and shrubs which would produce an effective solid screen no less than 10 ' high within a period of 2 to 3 years. The Owner will agree to any further modifications along the B-1 zoned property that the City Council sees fit to propose in order to mitigate the perceived impacts. Setbacks not less than 25 ' would be allowed where buildings front adjacent B-1. • -spectfu Imit ed, • 1111111 Steve Leit e, A. . of R4,4, " ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT h" RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rLL 4. o o ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 o99EC SEP1 1-.55 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 17, 1987 Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 19518 Pacific Highway South, Suite 202 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Windsor Place Apartments, Files R-119-86, SA-120-86, CU-121-86 Dear Mr. Leitzke: • This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the Windsor Place Apartments proposed for a site located in the 4300 block of N.E. 4th Street. The Committee on April 8, 1987, decided that your project requires a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: • 1. That a retention pond designed for a twenty-five year storm retention and five year storm release rate be provided to control downstream erosion and sedimentation; 2. That the applicant pay a storm assessment fee of $11,603.06 to cover construction costs associated with the rehabilitation program for the Heather Downs Basin; 3. That a $2.37 per trip traffic mitigation fee for signal coordination in the N.E. 3rd/N.E. 4th Street traffic corridor be provided; I-- 4. That a two-way left turn lane be provided at N.E. 4th and 136th Avenue S.E. prior to occupancy; 5. That during construction, a temporary erosion control plan and haul road of sufficient length and width so as to prevent mud and debris tracking onto N.E. 4th street be provided; 6. That N.E. 4th Street be improved with curbs and sidewalks to the west to connect with the existing sidewalk improvements east of Union Avenue N.E.; r Steve Leitzke Windsor Place Apartments April 17, 1987 Page 2 7. That a 40 foot wide construction and street improvement easement be provided from the end of 136th Avenue S.E. (proposed) to the north property line in order to allow the extension of 136th Avenue S.E. at a later date, if required; 8. That parking proposed under Buildings E., F., R., and S. be enclosed under the buildings and provided with garage doors to lessen the likelihood of crime in these areas; 9. That Building E. be separated into two buildings so that the proposed walkway at the east end of Building C. can be extended northward so as to link up with the pathway between Buildings H. and I. thereby potentially lessening pedestrian/vehicular conflicts; and 10. That "active" recreation facilities be sited, to the greatest extent possible, away • from residential areas to minimize noise impacts on these facilities. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there will be a fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end April 22, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there will be a 14 day appeal period. Appeals shall be made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner (if needed). If you have any questions or desire clarification of the;above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For a Environmental R Committee. Do . Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator S DKE:JSM:csb:3678Z • May 26, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS (Windsor Place Apartments) File No.: R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 LOCATION: 4300 Block of N.E. 4th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 2.9 acres from G-1 to R-3; site plan approval for a 202 unit multi-family complex on 11.4 acres and conditional use approval for a daycare facility on the site for use by residents of the complex. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Recommends approval of Rezone request by City Council. The Site Plan and Conditional Use requests are approved, with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was received DEPARTMENT REPORT: by the Examiner on May 5, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 12, .1987 at 9:10 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #5 - Elevations of structures Exhibit #6 - Elevations of Daycare Center Exhibit #7 - Revised Site Plan Exhibit #8 - Tract Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning .Administrator, Don Erickson. After identifying the property on the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Maps Mr. Erickson continued with a review of the criteria to be considered for a rezone stating the site is expected to increase the population of the area by 625 residents; a daycare facility is to be located on the site for use only by residents of the project; property to the west of the site has been rezoned to R-3 which is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods; 8.5 acres on the site are already zoned R-3 with the remaining 2.9 acres currently zoned G-1. Staff does not feel the 2.9 acres would be compatible with office or business usage on the site and recommend R-3 zoning for this portion of the site also. Reviewing the site plan request, Mr. Erickson reviewed the criteria to be considered noting the 8.5 acre portion of the site complies with all land use regulations, but if the 2.9 acre portion is not approved for a rezone it will be excluded from consideration in this request; the development should have a positive impact on surrounding property values; pedestrian pathways should provide safety along with the extension of other sidewalks in the area by the applicant; light and air provisions will be accomplished with the placement of buildings within 50 ft. of one another; recreational facilities are to be provided, "t'HE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 2 with the sport court being moved into the area near the recreation building so the walls of the building can be used as a noise buffer. Mr. Erickson stated the O-P zone could be compatible with the R-3 zone given its park-like setting; the applicant will try to preserve vegetation currently on the site; and feels there should be cooperation with Metro for transit service to the area due to the projected population of the development. The Examiner queried the zoning and contents of properties around the area south of the site and it was pointed out there is a large Safeway Store and undeveloped B-1 property to the south and west of the applicant's property. There is a setback of approximately 26 ft. between the apartments on the dogleg of the site and the business zoning to the south, and a setback of approximately 70 ft. from 4th Street; access to the site is off 136th (King County). Mr. Erickson continued with the information on the conditional use request stating the daycare facility request complies with the required criteria; is compatible with the surrounding facilities; the daycare center is not intended to be open to the general public but it was noted at some time in the future it is possible there may be a need for daycare business to come from outside due to future turnover of families with/without children - but that is not its intended use at this time. The Examiner asked that staff address a proposed condition to ensure the daycare is used only by residents of the project to avoid it becoming a commercial endeavor with people driving up early in the morning to drop off children which would be disturbing to residents of the units. Mr. Erickson advised traffic is of concern particularly if the daycare center should draw customers from outside the area, and will remain a concern until 136th Avenue as it is now shown, is widened. One-half of the street is scheduled for development by the applicant; adequate landscaping conditions have been met; and staff recommends the Examiner consider a condition of approval for the daycare center that would preclude patronage from families outside the proposed complex due to potential traffic impacts. It was recommended the Conditional Use Permit be approved subject to the conditions of the ERC and any others deemed necessary by the Examiner: The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this application by the applicant or their representative. Responding was Steve Leitzke, 19518 Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Wa. 98188. Exhibits 7 and 8 were presented incorporating all of staff recommendations on page 8 of the report; he stated the owners of the property have put forth a plan for a family oriented project of 1, 2, and 3- bedroom units, to be contained in 23 buildings, which they anticipate will be the impetus for filling the proposed daycare center. The daycare center is limited by State law to a maximum of 60 children. Mr. Leitzke stated if need be they would phase the project in order to begin construction as soon as possible on the already zoned R-3 portion. Phase 2 would be the 2.9 acres now seeking R-3 zoning. Phase one would include the improvements to NE 5th Street and the recreation center. He stated when the proposal originally came to the city it was felt the project would be under-serviced with roads and utilities, and as a condition of site plan approval the applicant was required to extend road improvements for NE 5th Street and the owner at that time decided to purchase the 2.9 acres now requested to be rezoned. Mr. Leitzke stated approximately 90% of Phase 2 of the project consists of the 3 bedroom units to the north and west of the project. The Examiner asked for the timing of the phases and Mr. Leitzke stated the applicant would build the entire project at the same time - the phasing is merely an instrument in the event the rezone request is not approved, they are not looking for any specific time limit. He pointed out that on the new plans Building E has been split, as suggested by staff, to enable the walkways to be extended into the area of the recreation building. He stated there is a topography problem as there is a difference between the parking lot surface and the road surface of 136th Street and they are working with engineering to try to determine how to proceed with that intersection; they are working on a right-hand turn lane on N.E. 4th which will encroach somewhat into the intersection. These are engineering problems the applicant is working on with the city and feel confident can be worked out to a mutual satisfaction. • The Examiner expressed his concern regarding the visibility and noise factor interface between the applicant's R-3 zoning and the western B-1 zoning containing Safeway Store's rear wall delivery area and any new B-1 that may be developed to the south and west of the site. The Examiner stated some of the applicant's buildings are quite close to the western property line, and although 20 ft. seems adequate for a setback, early morning or evening hour deliveries may create unwanted noise and/or sight problems for residents of this proposal. Mr. Leitzke stated he felt the building setbacks and landscaping in those areas could be increased to create a solid screen to alleviate those impacts. He pointed out that setbacks on buildings N and 0 are 25 ft. and the setback on building G is approximately 30 ft., both of which are in excess of the setback requirements of 12 ft. He had no further testimony. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: '1 HE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R.-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 3 FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, The Leitzke Architects, filed a request for approval of: 1) a Rezone of approximately 2.9 acres from G-1 (General;Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family); 2) a Site Plan approval for 202 units over 11.4 acres; and 3) a Conditional Use Permit to allow a daycare center in the R-3 zone. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinen9 materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the north side of the 4300 block of N.E. 4th Street, between Union Avenue N.E. on the west and Duvall Avenue N.E. on the east. 6. Access to the site is proposed from N.E. 5th Street which intersects the site from the west and is proposed to traverse the site west to east. Access would also be provided from Bremerton Avenue N.E. (which is the Renton designation of 136th Avenue S.E.) just east of the site. A series of driveways would provide access along these two public streets. There would be no direct access to N.E. 4th Street. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 2290, enacted in November, 1966. Part of the site was rezoned from its initial G-1 (General; Single Family -Residential) to its current R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family) with the adoption of Ordinance 2482, enacted in May, 1969. The approximately 2.9 acres subject to the current rezone request retain their original G zoning. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Office/Office Park, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. Development patterns surrounding the subject site vary. North and east of the subject site undeveloped land and single family uses predominate. South of the site single family homes and commercial uses predominate. Multiple family uses and commercial uses are located west of the site. 10. A single family home and accessory buildings are currently located on the subject site. These structures would be removed if the subject proposal is approved. 11. The subject site consists generally of gently rolling terrain, although steeper sections occur as the site gains approximately 20 feet from the south to the north. The applicant proposes to maintain the topographical relief while modifying it somewhat to provide level building pads, parking areas, on-site storm drainage retention ponds and the necessary roads and driveways. 12. The applicant proposes 202 dwelling units contained within 23 buildings. The units will contain one, two and three bedroom units. The complex will also contain a recreation building, sports court and swimming pool. 13. The portion of the subject site which is the subject of the rezone request is located immediately west of the R-3 zoned parcel (see map) approximately three quarters of the distance from south to north, along the west property line. 14. A wide mix of zoning districts surround the subject site. Directly north is an R-3 district, while large G-1 districts are located both east and west of the site.. A small R-3 district is located west of the section of the subject site proposed for R-3 zoning. The B-1 (Business/Commercial) district located at the intersection of Union and 4th is located west of the site. An O-P district is located south of the site across 4th. 15. Parking for the complex will be provided in a series of lots adjacent to the buildings. The total complement of parking will be 354 spaces or 1.75 stalls per unit. 202 stalls, or one per unit will be covered parking. 16. The complex has been designed so that opposing buildings, will not be closer than 50 feet from each other. In other words, the windows of units will be separated by at least 50 linear feet. End wall units would be closer, but still not closer than approximately 20 feet from each other. 17. Pathways in most cases would provide pedestrian corridors separated from parking lots and driveways to assure pedestrian safety within the complex. C • LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 4 18. The pattern of the western property line forms an inverted 'L' around the B-1 zone which contains the Safeway Complex on the northeast corner of Union and 4th. This Office pointed out the particularly unaesthetic (atrocious may correctly characterize it) juxtaposition of the Safeway rear wall and delivery bays with the front yards of its neighboring apartment complex. The similar configuration of lot lines in the instant case could create a similar situation if landscaping or fencing is not utilized 19. In addition to the recreation building, pool and sports court, open space will be provided in three main areas - an open landscaped detention pond, an open space seating area, a children's play area, and three larger landscaped open space areas on the site. i 20. The applicant intends to construct!the entire project in one phase, if the zoning is approved for the western portion. Depending upon the outcome of the rezone request and the fact that as a separate matter it must go to Council for approval, the applicant proposes two phases. The main property would be developed with 158 units, most of the open space, all of the recreational amenities and detention systems. Phase II would consist of the remaining acreage, 2.9 acres, the remaining 44 units and the proposed Day Care Center. 21. The residential buildings would all be 2 stories, while the recreation building and the daycare center would be one story each. Nineteen of the residential buildings would contain basements. The buildings would range in unit count from a minimum of four units to a maximum of 12 units. Many of the buildings would have facades which modulate, that is rather than containing one long exterior wall the buildings would step in arid out or contain recessed or articulated entry ways. Building types, those containing the same floor plans or exterior appearances, generally are spread across the site avoiding the monotony of cookie cutter houses. 22. The population of the complex is projected to be approximately 625 people, with a school age population of approximately 50 students (.25 per unit). Trip generation would be estimated to be in a range of anywhere from 5 to 8 trips per unit, based upon the average of 6 trips, the traffic would be approximately 1212 trips per day. 23. Each of the units will contain outside decks ranging from 35 square feet per unit for one bedroom units to 97 square feet for the 3 bedroom units. The units themselves will range from approximately 705 square feet to 1,141 square feet. 24. The applicant proposes constructing a daycare center to service the needs of residents of the complex. The center would be located east of the eastern edge of the westerly 2.9 acres which is subject to the rezone request. Daycare centers are permitted in R-3 zones, the zoning requested for the site, by a Conditional Use Permit. 25. The center would be one story and contain 3,200 sq ft. The center would be located off of the proposed N.E. 5th Street in the middle of the complex. CONCLUSIONS Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for.the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified. 2. The area requested for the rezone is located in the center of a large block. Access is provide by N.E. 5th Street which intersects the parcels' west property line. The street is surrounded by residential zoning and development. While the Comprehensive Plan may have designated the site for Office Park uses, the locale is not quite appropriate. Immediately east of the requested rezone site is the applicant's 8.42 acres of R-3 where an apartment complex is proposed. 3. In other words, the site is generally surrounded by residential uses. While there is commercial zoning immediately south of the site, this zoning is the B-1 district encompassing the Safeway store. The connection between the sites is only the common property line. As indicated above, access to the subject site is not via a main arterial but rather a smaller residential street. f i THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 5 Commercial or even Office Park development would actually be an intrusive bulge northward into the residential development patterns now established. 4. Since it seems likely that the main portion of the applicant's property, which is zoned for residential use, will be developed with compatible residential development, it appears likely that the Comprehensive Plan's designation for this area will not be fulfilled, at least not immediately, on any portion of the subject site. 5. While it appears reasonable to rezone the approximately 2.89 acres to R-3, the common property line the site shares with the Safeway B-1 zone does raise a red flag. As indicated in the Findings above, that transition was not handled particularly well just west of this site and there is concern that a similar juxtaposition of housing and delivery trucks could occur. Therefore, a main concern would be that sensitive site planning be required. These measures would include dense landscaping and fencing to screen the residential uses both visually and acoustically. 6. In addition, similar rezones were approved by the City Council for the property west of the site indicating a preference for medium density residential uses just north of the commercial corridor along N.E. 4th Street. 7. Therefore, this office would recommend that the City Council approve the request to reclassify the subject site from G-1 to R-3. Site Plan 8. The proposed apartment complex generally appears well designed, but once again emphasizing the the large Safeway complex tucked in between the western edge of the site's main parcel and the southern edge of the parcel proposed for rezoning, conditions to avoid both visual intrusion and noise intrusion must be imposed. 9. The proposal is generally in conformance with the zoning on the site, but does diverge from the Comprehensive Plan which at one time called for residential use but more recently was amended to suggest office park uses. The use is compatible with the zoning and the applicant is entitled to utilize that zoning. The open nature of the complex, while obviously not an office park, provides a park-like transition to the area. 10. The buildings are generally widely spaced, and front and rear walls of adjacent buildings are at a minimum 50 feet from each other permitting reasonable penetration of both light and air into the complex and into the individual units. The low rise nature of the buildings aid this penetration of light and air. 11. Covered parking will be provided for each unit, with an additional 152 stalls. The parking complement will be approximately 1.75 stalls per unit which appears reasonable. 12. On-site amenities include a recreation building, pool, sports court, children's play area as well as sitting area, open space areas and lawn and landscaped areas. Pedestrian corridors connect all areas of the complex with one another, and these corridors avoid conflict with either the parking areas or driveways. 13. There does not appear to be any reason to expect that the proposal would diminish property values, although again, the character of the interface between the.Safeway and its northern neighbor west of this site, if similarly played out on this site, could adversely affect property values. That transition, or lack of transition, creates at least a nuisance potential and definitely deprives the residential units of the quiet amenities normally found in residential communities. 14. The site is well served by schools with Hazen High School northeast of the site, and middle and elementary schools approximately 1 to 1-1/2 miles from the site. 15. Access to the site will avoid any interference with the arterial functions of N.E. 4th Street by providing all access to Bremerton Avenue and then to 4th. No private driveways will intersect 4th. 16. In order to avoid any adverse land use impacts and nuisances which could be created by the close juxtaposition of the apartment complex and the Shopping Center, minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet, the type of separation shown between the apartments on the site, should be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the Safeway B-1 district. In addition, the 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. The purpose of this landscaping shall be.to minimize the visual intrusion of the shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to some extent the noises associated with the center. To supplement the buffer, and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and the property line. . • ' `THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 6 Conditional Use Permit 17. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general commur ity need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; • g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified although conditions appear warranted to assure that the center is not intrusive and continues to serve the needs of the residents of the complex. 18. The proposed daycare center is no more of a deviation from the Comprehensive Plan than is the principle proposal, the apartment complex. As a matter of fact the daycare center would be more in line with the office park designation. A daycare center is a commercial use which would be an appropriate complement to an office park. In this case though it is proposed to serve the residents of the apartment as a conditional use. 19. The applicant proposes serving the needs of the immediate residents of the complex. The incorporation of the daycare center in the complex would eliminate or minimize the drop off and pick up phenomenon. Children or parents could actually walk to the center. The proposed location serves this purpose well. 20. The only potential problem could be a change in demographics which would reduce the resident client load for the center. In that case the center would not be conveniently located for outsiders and could present an intrusive noise and commercial element into the complex. While the center would be located off of N.E. 5th, that street is a small residential street and it should not have to serve commercial purposes. For this reason, the use of the center should be limited to serve only those people living at the complex and possibly those working at the complex. 21. It does not appear likely that the daycare center will adversely affect adjacent property, although one would expect the normal noise associated with children playing when the children are outside. Outside activities should therefore, be kept to a minimum prior to 8:00 A.M. 22. The one story, 3,200 sq. ft. center will be in keeping with the scale of surrounding buildings which will be two stories. Landscaping will blend the center in with its surroundings. • 23. As indicated above, the Site Plan accommodates the needs of pedestrians at this complex by providing separate pathways removed from vehicle circulation areas. Sufficient parking is provided at the complex, although it is not evident if additional staff parking has been provided. 24. Again, it does not appear that the center should have an adverse impact on neighboring property and it appears that noise, light and glare should not be an issue. 25. The entire complex appears to be well landscaped and the daycare center will be incorporated into the complex's landscaping theme. Conclusion 26. In conclusion, the general design of the proposal as well as the daycare center and rezone appear to serve the public use and interest. Modifications of the design will be required to set back the project from the B-1 zone containing the Safeway complex south and west of the subject site. The setback as stated will have to be not less than 50 feet, of which the 10 feet closest the B-1 zone and following the property line will have to be densely screened. • • 'THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 May 26, 1987 Page 7 27. In order to minimize confusion and assure that this condition is both clear and has been clearly satisfied, the plans will have to be modified and submitted back to this office within 30 days of this decision to allow for subsequent review. This condition may necessitate a reduction in the number of units and that result is contemplated by this decision. 28. The proposed phasing of the project is reasonable providing that all road improvements and recreational amenities are provided with the completion of Phase I. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the approximately 2.9 acres of property from G to R-3. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will have to provide minimum setbacks of not less than 50 feet to be observed along all portions of the property which share a common property line with the Safeway B-1 district. 2. The 10 feet of this required setback closest to and abutting this common property line shall be landscaped with dense evergreen foliage. The purpose of this landscaping shall be to minimize the visual intrusion of the shopping center on the apartment complex and to buffer to some extent the noises associated with the center. 3. To supplement the buffer and to serve to attenuate the noise, a solid fence not less than the maximum permitted under the Zoning Code shall be erected between the landscaping and the property line. 4. Staff and the applicant are left to determine whether access to the parking area for Buildings A and B can safely intersect the Bremerton right-of-way. 5. All plans shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department to assure safe emergency access, with the proviso that reduction of landscaping shall be kept to a minimum and that fire lanes, unless absolutely necessary, shall not be paved roads. The Conditional Use Permit for the daycare center is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The daycare center shall only serve the needs of the residents or employees of the complex. 2. Outside play prior to 8:00 A.M. shall be kept to a minimum. The entire proposal remains subject to the conditions imposed by the ERC. ORDERED THIS 26th day of May, 1987. .91• FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of May, 1987 to the parties of record: Steve Leitzke �.•,; 19518 Pacific Highway South, Suite 202 ; Seattle, Washington 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of May, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission • *THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS R-119-86, SA-120-86 & CU-121-86 • May 26, 1987 Page 8 Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. June 9, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedur , errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within•fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them;to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • 0. CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division November 28 , 1989 RE: Windsor Place, Tender Years Day Care, N.E. 5th Street and Bremerton Avenue, (CU 072-89) Dear Interested Party: Thank you for expressing your support for the Tender Years Day Care Center. I am pleased to notify you that the applicant has now provided the City with completed application materials so that we may continue to process the request for expansion of the Day Care Center. The public hearin9' before the Hearing Examiner for consideration of this project has been tentatively scheduled for December 12 , 1989 in the Renton City Council Chambers, on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building, at 9:00 a.m. You are welcome to attend that meeting if your schedule permits. In any event, your letter will become a of the official project record and will be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 a i ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C/O DON ERICKSON, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DtPARTMENT 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 November 17, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Renton Chamber of Commerce ATTN: Kay Johnson NOV 2 1 1989 300 Rainier North Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Kay, I am writing this letter as a result of a public notice I read on a telephone pole outside my son°s day care, Tender Years, at 4311 NE 5th St. The notice said the day care cannot continue as a day care facility because of delays in obtaining their licensing for children who live outside the apartment complex. It upsets me that a quality day care facility like Tender Years is having to shut its doors due to delays in getting the appropriate approvals from local agencies. I have had my three year old in several other licensed day care centers in the local area and I can say without a doubt that the care he has received there over the last year is the best of all. I had even visited several other day cares before selecting Tender Years for my son. Also the issue of availability in local day care centers should be of concern to the city because spaces are so hard to come by. A visit to the local area will impress upon anyone that the growth of apartments has only made the shortage of good day care worse. I urge you to assist Tender Years continue as a quality day care for our children. Sandra K. Sin leton --_- � , TMAA � ' ' November 21 , 1989 Environmental Review Committee PLANNING DIVISION c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Admin. CITYOFRENTON Current Planning Division Community Development Department NOV 2 1 1989 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055RECEIVE/ To Whom It May Concern, I am very upset that people feel that the Tender Years Day Care should be closed. The main reason I moved into the Windsor Apts was because they had a Day Care Center on the premises . Reason #2 - all of the other Day Care Centers around that area had a waiting list a mile long. Reason #3 - the school bus picks up the kindergarten kids right in front of the Day Care Center who have to travel all the way to Hazelwood 21ementary school. My daughter Shante has been in the Tender Years Day Care center for 7 months now. She has learned to care and trust the staff at this center and has many friends and schoolmates that also attend Tender Yeas . She has learned alot and she knows that the staff at the Center cares and wants to help her learn. If this center is closed it will cause alot of parents hard times trying to find a Day Care that meets up to the Tender Years standards . Plus the children will go through many changes of having to deal with strangers , new surroundings , and losing friendships that they have already established within this Day Care Center. I am pleased at the way the center is run, how clean and tidy it is , and very pleased with all the staff. They have shown me that they are interested and dedicated to taking good care of my and all of the children who attend here. Please do not close this Day Care down! ! ! ! We need it in our community. Thank you, ' 01-=b)lalk— SILLIN11-(LUS- Susan Saunders 4415 NE 5th Street #G103 Renton , WA 98056 228-6223 FROM TP E, INC, _ 11,21, 1 R.9 14:20 NG, 4 P. E TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 •1 12th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110— BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 vi rf,)F1 H $ISHQN t E TELEPHONE 455-5320•—AREA CODE 206 Prmidgnt November 21 , 1989 PLANNING DIVISIONS Mr. Steve Leitzke CITE OF RFNT®N THE LEITZKE. ARCHITECTS NOV 2 1 1989 3600 136th Pl. S.E. , #401 Bellevue, WA 98001 RECEIVE® Re; Windsor Apartments Day Care Center City of Renton ECF-072-89 and CU-072--89 Dear Steve: Yesterday I spoke with Tina Phillips, the Manager of the Tender Years Day Care facility at the Windsor Apartments. She said the current enrollment is 23 children, including 14 enrolled full time and nine "floaters". The "floaters" are children who attend day care before and/or after their regular school session, typically during the 6:30 to 8;00 AM and 3: 30 to 6:30 PM time periods. All of these children live in the Windsor Apartments, and most of them walk to the day care center. The current enrollment is substantially more than the enrollment of eight children at the time ,our traffic study was conducted in August, 1989. With this increased enrollment of children living in the Windsor Apartments, the enrollment of apartment residents becomes a more significant factor in the traffic analysis. Table 1 of my August 31 , 1989 traffic analysis report shows the estimated total vehicular trip generation for a 3500 square foot day care facility. Assuming full enrollment of 60 children, about 23 'children are residents of the Windsor Apartments, and that about two thirds of enrolled Windsor Apartment residents walk to the day care facility, I would expect the new • vehicle trip generation due to the proposal to be about 70% of the values shown in Table 1 . Based on these assumptions, the proposal 11,21, 19 .M1_-, 14:21 NO, 4 P. 3 4 Mr. Steve Leitzke November 21 , 1989 Page -2- to open the day care facility to public enrollment would generate up to about 164 new vehicle trips per average weekday, about 30 trips during the AM and PM peak hours 1 including and 15 exiting the site during each (about 15 entering streets, with the traffic impact mitigation o recommended adjacentur) . The e City's Determination of Non--Significance the accommodate this additional traffic. (Mitigated) , will Please contact me if you have any additional questions Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. C&,-41 ?Q4.' David H. Enger, P.E. DRE:mb Vice President cc: Don Erickson, City of Renton Zoning Administrator 11* PRI MARK PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RE TOI November 21, 1989 NOV 81 198 RECEIVED Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South RE: Tender Years Daycare Center Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA Dear Mr. Erickson: Please use this letter as confirmation that we agree to Condition #2 of the "Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated--Mitigation Measures". This condition states: "That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services management bond in the amount of $10,200.00 subject to the approval of the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of three (3) years." We submit this confirmation to you in order to facilitate the permit process for our Tender Years Daycare Center in Renton. If we can provide further information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sinc?.rely, Hon�1 S. Tan President HST/gsl 102 - 1200 S. 192nd Street Seattle, Washington 98148 (206) 241-6241 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RE iTON NOV 21 198 WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATES 1200 S 192nd RECEIVED Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98148 November 20, 1989 Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South RE: Tender Years Daycare Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA Dear Mr. Erickson: We are writing this letter to affirm our support for the enrollment of off- campus children into the Tender Years Daycare Center at Windsor Place, Renton, WA. The above-referenced daycare center has proven to be a very important element of the Windsor Place Community and we have discovered recently that the surrounding neighborhoods are seriously lacking in quality, licensed daycare. We have a waiting list of families who want very much to utilize the daycare facility and we want very much to provide that opportunity to them. We, therefore, respectfully request that you place on-record that Windsor Place Associates, as owner of the Windsor Place Apartments, fully support the continued existence and expansion to off-campus children of the Tender Years Daycare Center. If we can provide you with additional information or respond further to this permit process, pleae feel free to contact us. Sincerely, dir Jo IN% im General Partner WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATES JH/gsl • PLANNING DIVISION. . /0/3 - .Ze37 CITY OF RENTON (i ��Ce 7ej Z%, 5805 6 : NOV 2 1 1989 EPEI v`E d .t ,i.t!.0.,‘‘,A.0-ed • ..ed -1-avz--e(-41•" Gie2 a - , ,,d2aZ daie-4,zzel "Gead/)iy aa/ izgez ,"-Z "i Gem ' � . . �� .� - '5!-) (ta;Z ,a2e • eioze dzieet/ " • ,6a/4-zizer/ e. • 'e.", 41e/%1 */ ,q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . , •. . . • . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . ' . • . .. . . . . _ . . . . . . . . .. ... ., • . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , • . . . . . . ' . ' - ' • . . ' • - • • . . .. • . . . ' . . .. . . . ., . .. . . . . . . , .. .. . . . . . . . . . • ' • • . , . . . , , , . • . .. ,.. . . •. . , . . . • A .... . . . . . • • . . ,, . .. . • • . ' ' '''1\ P\ ..• •• . .• . . . • ; . , .• . . •.. • . ..•. .. . . ... . . . . ‘.,.• , .. . . , . . . . . . .• • . . . • . , . - • • • • . • . . , • • . . . . . - . . . . . • . . . . , . . .. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . • • . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .• , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . •• .. , . . . . . - .. . - . . . . . . . • . . • . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . .. , . . • . . . . . .. . . ... . .. . • • • . . . .. . . . . ,.. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . .. . . , - -•,,. , . . ., . . . . . .. . . . , • , , . . . . .. . . .. . , . • • . :k , , .. • . „ . , . ... • . . . . . .. . ... • . . . .••• ....,. .. . ,' , . . . ...• . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . "" , .. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . • . . ., .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . •,. • . . . .. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. . , . . .. . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . , . . . .. . . . . . . .. ..,...,. ._ . .. . . . • .. . . . . . '. A.. . . . . .. . . , . . ... . . . . ., . ... .. ,•. ....• .....,• ..,, .. .'.• .r.;-. .. '. '. . • .-.,-; , ,.„ ' . .' 1 . . . . . ., ., ... , . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . •• .,. ., ,. . . , . • . . . . • . . . . . ... •,• . .. .. .. • • •. ., • . . . . : . . , .. . . . . . . , . .'•• • . . -. • • •, . .• . , . • . . . .• • •. . .. • „ . . • . 1..\ • l‘\- • . :., ... ,,..• ... .. ., ... . .. . ..•• . . . • ."''. .' , . •....I. " ' . . • • . •• . . .-... •• , : . . . • • .: ..' . , . . ....- . ." . . . . . . • . , . ,. . . . ,.. • , . : . . .• ' . ; • . .N. A . . • .. • :. . ..• • . . ., .-. . . ., . . . . 1 \,. ' .i .• . .: . , ,...•'...' ' .' . . ,-., ''''..':;•-.. •:',.., . . . . .. . . ,......,". ..• '. .. , .. . . ,. . . . .. . . . .. •, . . . .- . . . .., .. . .. . . . . . ..... . ....••:.. , •'. ' . , . . • . .. . '', •.. • . , . .... .. . • . . .. .' .....‘. .....1,'1. :: . .. . . '.. :.. 1' ''' .• .....e. . . ... . .. . .' . . . . . . ... '.. , ... ,, . .. . .•. . . . . .. .. , . , . , .. , •• . . . , . . ,• . . . . .--. :: ' ...-: •''' ' . ...:". . •....- ...• •• . .. ,. .. . .•, ... ..,. . . . , • . ... . . . ... . . . . . . . . , . . . • •. : .. . ; .• -•,' 2-, . . . . . . - • , •. . .. . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .. . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . .. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , • - . . . . , . . .. . . . . . . . , . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . .. • ' - •-•-• •• Enviromental Review Committee C/0 Don Erickson Zoning Administrator f9FT' Current Planning Division PUNNING DIVISION Community Development Department GITy OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 NOV 2 1 1989 Dear Mr. Erickson: The purpose of this letter is to voice our opinion over the future of the "Tender Years" child care facility located in the "Windsor" apartments. For the past 8 months our children have attended on a daily basis. We as well as our children have, from the outset, been very pleased with the love attention and total care provided at the facility. The possibility that we may be forced to make other arrangements for our children's daily careis from our viewpoint unsettling, costly and most un- fair. In our relocation from Tokyo Japan to Seattle we chose "Tender Years" and Renton for the following reasons. 1) The director and staff's professional approach to child care. 2) The center is convienient to our apartment, my work location and Metro transportation as my wife can not drive in city traffic. 3) At the time of our settleing in Renton, my daughter was less than 1; year old. As we researched over 120 day care operations we found that most will not take children less than 1 and many will not accept children less than 2 years of age. Being forced to place our children elsewhere will most surely cause unnes- sary emotionally strain on our children and difficult if nut impossible financial strain. Such a situation would prompt our leaving Renton. There is simply no acceptable child care available to meet our specific needs in this area. We respectfully ask that those in authority step from behind the beauro- cratic goings on and take an honest, carefull look at how decisions made, if not prudent, will cause unneccessary and far reaching problems for those of us directly involved as well as the ;community. Tender Years is a parents dream come true. Thank you for your favorable consideration. Resp-• .f ly urs/11111111 Mr. and Mrs. Richard A. Garner November 2 0, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON City of Renton NOV 2. 1 1989 Environmental Review Committee ��aa % Don Erickson R SCENE® Current Planning Division Community Development Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Tender Years School Dear Mr. Erickson: In response to concerns reguarding the operation of Tender Years School at the on-site location of The Windsor Apartments, please be advised that the management staff supports continued operation of the school and the request to open the facilities to off-premise families . The input received by our office from residents and prospects is very positive and the school is a strong factor in the decision for many families to live at The Windsor. We work very close with the school staff and we feel both the school and the apartment community benefit as a result. The families living here will always be given first priority and the need for additional child-care facilities in this area is very strong. We trust the request to open the Tender Years facility to off-premise children meets with your committee ' s approval. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call our office at 277-1931 . Sincerely, THE WINDSOR APARTMENTS Kay Olso Resident Manager °TATg° 4 vEi' 9 W ii:' � iijrj JULE M. SUGARMAN ems' Secretary 'N/lees a°y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES 2809-26th Avenue South, N56-1 • Seattle, Washington 98144-6094 November 20, 1989 Don Erickson PLAN)I3NC DIVIS80 9 Environmental Review Committee/ UUTY 0FRENTON Current Placement NOV 2 1 1989 Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVED Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: I am writing in support of the Tender Years Child Care facility in Renton. I understand that a determination is to be made on whether they will be restricted to serving only children of the apartment complex in which they are located, or whether they will be allowed to serve the entire community. I understand there may even be some question of whether the child care facility should be replaced by additional apartment units. I strongly support that the child care facility continue in existance and that it be allowed to serve the entire Renton . community. I have visited this facil- ity several times and found it to be a well designed, nicely equipped, but underutilized child care facility. The staff that I have met that continue to work there appear capable and committed to quality child care. I believe there is sufficient demand in the larger community for quality child care facilities, especially for centers providing infant care. Tender Years could provide a valuable service to area residents outside of the apartment complex. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact 'me at 721-4447. Very truly yours, Peter Dahl Child Care Agency Licensing 3 Pamela J. Gilson 4310 N.E. 5th Street, #C101 RI.ARMNG DIV SI0N Renton, Washington 98056 CITYOERENTON NOV 2 1 1989 November 20, 1989 RECEIVE* Environmental Review Committee C/O Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington, 98055 Re: Tender Years Child Care, 4311 N.E. 5th Street, # A, Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Erickson, I was informed Friday by Tina Phillipps, Director of Tender Years Child Care that they will be having to close the doors to their facility in January. If they are able to open their doors to the general public they may remain open. It is extremely difficult to find quality day care and pre-school and space is a premium in the Renton Highland area. My 4 year old has been in two other child care facilities in the last year alone. I don' t want to make her move again. It is my true belief that the education at Tender Years, provides my child the highest quality I have experience yet. It would be sad to loose such a fine facility when quality day care is so hard to find. In as much as they are seeking re-zoning to remain open, I for one frustrated parent implore you to expedite the process and keep Tender Years Child Care serving children in my community. Sincerely, Pamela J. Gilson Concerned Parent PLANNING DIVISION S CITY OF RENTON LORI K. FITZWATER NOV 21 1989 t f/79/?7 5 DECEIVE i, J ajyyz-_, a- 4 i'Lg u li Q 2 oticiAl c U JI - Gla e ' - aid _rt-a--CL-5 L- acti. - ems � . bit.) ticia CLA,e_a_ cyf eutuyzat `--n-Le- 6-6 -6:14. A. diii;tild- 6-0-0 64-L, 0-4(,61 .stale-ot coo. it..01. C `� k k o cc- -0.41° - 6( (-e-1--/-er-EL° 5'kz-111 U' a_ rn VYt2-/ )' , ao ®.Q i,u- L kk-a..Je- / Y-O-u`e \ttiLe ) 1 Len%fl-c-6 c_,t-yi-otcLeA, /7),/,,a ,A-e/La cbo 0-6 --T)L v--ZALL, w-e-U fe-( - 0 40 egL_L_e_ *IA eb PLANNING DIVISION Camela Venesky CITY OFRENTON 4310 NE Fifth Street #B202 NOV 2 1 1989 Renton , WA 98056 ( 206) 277-9971 11/18/89 To Whom It May Concern : Being a parent who uses the preschool at Tender Years I feel extremely passionate about this issue and it' s hard to find a place to begin. But you know it goes much deeper than that. I feel that Government , Business , and society has-geared: itself into a monetary value system. We no longer do what' s good for the people or for the family unit , we head for where the money is. I think that this is the base of the problem with the Tender Years facility.. , May I say it was incredibly difficult to gather information about who was trying to close the facility and why. Everyone that I talked to had a bit of a different story. From what .I was able to gather it is the owners of the apartment complex . Apparently they would be able to generate more revenue by creating more apartments. The people trying to close the facilities , whom ever they are , seem to have based their argument on a traffic flow problem that would be caused by opening the facility to the public . Unfortunately I'm not quite sure if this is accurate since acquiring information was very difficult. I ' d really like to know why each parent wasn' t required to have a letter sent to them stating who was, trying to close the facility and why. Well I'm sure I do know - we would have been better able to provide substantial information requiring the facility to remain open. PAGE 2 OF CAMELA VENESKY's LTR DATED 11/18/89 We could have performed our own samplings. Well at any rate there is one thing I do know for a fact. After they conducted their traffic flow study a new apartment complex began construction right next to the Windsor. Now may I appeal to your common sense? Wouldn' t an apartment complex generate much more traffic flow than a child care center? I ' d like to know how building permits can be given out like candy yet Tender Years is facing closure do to traffic flow? - It' s absolutely inconceivable , especially when there is so much information out there concerning the lack of good child care in these days of two income families. It ' s unbelievable that anyone would try to put forth the effort to close down this excellent facility! As a matter of fact the licensed centers in our area have waiting lists. That gives us/ the option of subscribing to people who aren' t qualified to have our children. The care givers may or may not have early childhood education to deal with our children . They usually don' t have the much needed first aid training which the Tender Years staff has. Yes the Tender Years facility provides the security of our children being nurtured , educated , and having their needs' taken care of in the most professional sense. There are so many things,. when a facility is under state control , that parents don' t have to worry about. Even the menus are regulated to make sure children get the proper nutrition. As a working Mom I can' t tell you how important these things are to me. These things are important to all of us - the people who currently use the facility and the people hungrily waiting for the public entry approval . ' • ) N. PAGE 3 OF CAMELA VENESKY's LTR DATED 11/18/89 In closing let me say that the greater Seattle area is facing many new issues with our almost uncontrollable growth. Let' s make sure that in all the decisions we make concerning growth that we have the foresight to encourage safe , qualified facilities for our children to grow and develop in. Let' s please start making our children our priority - not cash gains and traffic flow. Sincerely a parent concerned , 64;011.e.61()A-- .Camels Ja Ven - Y Voter Registration 1# 1- 59,-- c —C0 SS a TENDER YEARS SCHOOLS I Nov. 18, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION Envirormental Review Committee CITY OF RENTON C/O Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Community Development Department NOV 711989 Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue, South ; Renton, Washington 98055 � ��� �` ' Attention: Don Erickson Tender Years Schools began with an attempt to provide quality, "Neighborhood Schooling" type daycare for the residents of the aparment complexes built by Primark Co. The first center opened in Olympia, Washington on October 18, 1987. In addition to our Renton and Olympia facilities, we have an existing center in Federal Way and a center currently being built in Redmond, with another in the the planning stage for Everett. Our intention at the Renton facility is to accept children from the surrounding area so that we will be able to provide separate classes for Infants, Toddlers, 3 year olds, 4 year olds, Pre Kindergartners, and before and after school children. During the summer months, we provide all day service. We currently have 21 full time children with 2 additional drop-ins. The Windsor Apartments are now full and we do not expect the complex to produce much more than the 23 children we now serve. There are 202 units in the complex with 154 units having 2 or 3 bedrooms. These are, the units most likely to house children. These units now house approximately 95 children of all ages. Of the 95 children of all ages, 23 are coming to Tender Years. We are licenced to handle 70 children and we believe that the 23 children comming from the complex itself will probably stay constant. To make it financially feasible for our Renton center to operate, it is necessary to staff at the maximum allowed by the State of Washington. This allows 1 staff member for each infant, 1 staff mwmber for each child between 1 and 2 1/2 years, and 1 staff member for each 10 children over 2 1/2 years. The Renton center has operated since opening on Oct. 1, 1988, with approximately 1 Infant, 9 Toddlers, 5 3-4 year olds, and 5 school age children. We are open between the hours of 6:30 am and 6: 30 pm, which makes it necessary to have more than one staff member for each classroom. The State also requires a Director, Curriculum Director, and Cook. The total staff requirement is 10-12 staff 1200 SOUTH 192ND STREET,SEATTLE,WA 98148 (206)241-6241 members for the 23 children who attend from within the Windsor Apartments. Clearly it is necessary to recruit children from the surrounding community. A survey of this area where our daycare is located was done prior to the planning of the appartment complex. This survey showed a definate need for quality daycare. If we are not allowed to accept off premises children, it will necessary for the Renton Tender Years to close and the existing structure would be turned into 4 app'artment units. With the existing need for quality daycare in this area of Renton, it would be a great disappointment to the to the parents of the children we currently serve and those who have expressed an interest in having their children enrolled in our center. Sincerely, Shirley Lapp, Regional Director gzeo, Karene R. (Tina) Phillips, Director C (Q. 1 SURVEY OF THE EXISITING DAYCARE CENTERS SURROUNDING RENTON TENDER YEARS SCHOOL AGES Renton child care lyr . thru 12yrs . Licensed for 55 Existing waiting list 2834 Sunset Lane N.E. Renton, Washington Park Place - 18mo. thru 12yrs . Licensed for 72 Exisiting waiting list 1225 Anacortes N.E. Renton, Washington 271-0733 Tender Years School lmo. thru 8yrs . Licenced for 70 Existing outside waiting list 4311 N.E. 5th Street Renton, Washington 277-1696 Kinder-Care 6mo. thru 12yrs Licenced for 155 Existing waiting list 1225 Anacortes N.E. 271-0733 .i o -� SE 86 St - - _ ( •F ‘4c Post `' Z' i- �, U • Crest n�18 y9T o c� Z N SE 87 St- l �P 'PO" i J -13 \\ tp 37 ST _3 Q��` NE 36 SE 88 ST SF8 S �pC , z� y ii �36 I $ sr N� SE 69 p� d' N SE ay s7 c s N PRODUCTION IN WHOLE N 35 Si I, tv j < J; N�v F'/ a -, m OR PART FOR PERSONAL (::14:V! N 34 sT I' 1g s IC TT USE OR RESALE IS ,. P 1 w a NE 33 ST ' SE 91 ST ' .! N 33 ST,ST Renton ... ti,ws \ se91 ST ' PROHIBITED. ':,,,,::..,0';',;:,:. mil N -, sE 93 b �4' COLEMAN POINT '• Elfo lam' T ii TI W� SE M „ .i95 PE a pan" Rd ,. "�• N 28 PL e• $ 7+ N y 0.I''- U \ ,',,jAt'J� '\ N26ST ''�'' NE27ST ril4.A. ••rra Heigh t E w -�;»;�°` N �ennydates _ s w : W _ SE.,6ST SIERRA HTs ta'CC f F i zc ��{, i �� ARY+ NE 25 PL ,,11 ? •w <�.:rc doh" �, •°1 4 K (Y 24ST '' ST$ �i Yv w -CB00SE 0tST SE 5 pi �.•5 1,,i E,DO ST e t�.;' NE y Z SE,02 ST \e N24ST till s�E2 i SE102 �� aitilliQw_ N C m w�1 8 Herrington m • NE 22 , 7f `m' 2 - NE 22 ST PI NE m SE t03 ST .2 ita. PL NE 2 wr U N 1 a 21 T oos4 SSE 104 ST h > SUl1t��16 Wlnd 'a SE 10s ST-. } 4 NE 20 ST NE20 ST �Q� �e4, uL v NE 19 NE 20 ST NE 20 ST <,c ? . 04 \%N 20 ST ST eu NE 19 Z w N1 Z w NE i8�-3`Te�y !� 18 ST 17 PL, o W i ��`,a° �:� r 7 8..c' z P Q' < z� E155T .cg � SE 1i• 405 < NE t 16 V T y 15 PL , NE 17 S1 co NE 17 ST p,v \ W : _1 Q z t,. „,; o T i, t ., e 1 . , ,. c ° o m MC MIID a T R , U YNEtt �` Sr:••L+< Art s SE ttt Pi . r• ' SE,1 PL Tr.. /12 '� �� tiF • P T' : t °. tz E o 11 C SE 113 ST I erkrE �< �` �► , Q�.PL t2 STr Z. I 1 ` SE 114PLu1 — SEt14ST < ,M L ' k :0! NtOCt0 CTm ° � r8C800L ^~) e��g�THE BOEING COMPANY \\ ‘'.1. ��� Z SE 3Fow INDUSTRIAL AREA `, •�j a ,l NE NE tO ST, w <; y .•:,... .:. :.,... �_ / r 1155 t E' I �. E i�-oi 4--•�•••L o SE118ST lAtirt-. '' Ill/ 6 ts, •• •• •• ,„. ,, 'rr 1. N CQJ E Sly ��ik _ .�' � 6 C z Li_ s i ._ , SE 120 ST h Renton u ‘Viroi6'407 f '1 E1,2,ST' 7 •�' s <. 4. •� Te a z ° Y a 7 Kt C.b!a O •. NE 8 .^�.. y v ` •, }. 7 ' E 6776.... SE 122 ST m R RENTON; POSSIBLE FUTURE 0 e •. • Pt <'c ofirs NE K� ST d �, :- , 4 SE 124 ST 5 N ` > SITE g -ARTr 1 F ndso •'ewport OI pic Ave > 01 d I ` w �i MUNIgIW�L z } < RffiiWORCH TRUCK L P � vea d rn 5 ST <' Z S S T COMPANY Ea y N�r CT ' NE Highlands"E od``a'? �—"� z .- NRPORT �� RENi(81 VOt o' 0 ly zTacanicAL e - A SCHOOL NE 4 cT rt4 •• sot:4. l<•4 ST zg <L +' ve N �• .. November 17, 1989 Renton Chamber of Commerce PLANNING DIVISION ATTN: Kay Johnson art OFRENT®N 300 Rainier North Renton, WA 98055 NOV 1 1989 !=1EC VEz• Dear Kay, pnN eeicKsad I am writing this letter as a result of a public notice I read on a telephone pole outside my son's day care, Tender Years, at 4311 NE 5th St. The notice said the day care cannot continue as a day care facility because of delays in obtaining their licensing for children who live outside the apartment complex. It upsets me that a quality day care facility like Tender Years is having to shut its doors due to delays in getting the appropriate approvals from local agencies. I have had my three year old in several other licensed day care centers in the local area and I can say without a doubt that the care he has received there over the last year is the best of all. I had even visited several other day cares before selecting Tender Years for my son. Also the issue of availability in local day care centers should be of concern to the city because spaces are so hard to come by. A visit to the local area will impress upon anyone that the growth of apartments has only made the shortage of good day care worse. I urge you to assist Tender Years continue as a quality day care for our children. Sandra K. Singleton PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 1 1999 S2An4on 0,4 0,661,-) aL,-k_ ,Pe>/)-(29-f-=- LIL/q 1._.g /o-- da _ aa2,( . -(L d����% ✓_._ J/Le, zef&(dam d , J-)a/LLc ;16 M. L-AE__246 (A D I/a ( dzi,__41/),&A : /LP-enm_Z 6, C0.-teed cr y LOAA_____al)___Pg/- -5 /Q 144 -2,2 • c_zt d()Af- „6A,e) 0)-W_ Cad det,(466) je47:lin kb-U-fb A/A-)&t6:0. -_L7 /1 ,1( -61/ diec)i-e`' • p- ,(/ 6 6/0 iaav Lou (-CID PO- Ctio-C c0,2_ clav .egALO ic . Qom- EkM d L:K h � k� • • . • . PJelo. 4: fip 4c-? LL uv21, 4 93_ Litz a Lqry\atkou kL6 Ary) .• • - • , • . . •. - , -)7nvfizbe' ) / 7 Occ7 . p 4?"V/W0412'70„, • (//6V .......'..-''''' /,(g..- 7 ,-,,iiaQt7%s)10, C Oh) . ... 2;2/4/ 64(//,)rri . ,,,,,,,,it„,4,6,./(,/ ./A /,? . . -'+ .., i::_. -a 1 ' it - ` f 0id OZ , 52 C-e.)ke,7),L. 7.7262-v - Cam. alzL -x eat-cc/(2 0-2-7/ oC . esz icg Qa2-etc - q2 . ZCO—Q 6),-nclsfx . CD 1L1 CfPft1/4-- .A6_,bL_Q__ a_ 6 y/e 0/G( oA_) mho Wagre(woo cC • , (e_p(d=ay>, ! k?(_" . 46 (1/- - � lut/r 1 e,z---- • - - c ; ! srix),0(1 L . ! ddaf..eA.3 - W-Le.4<do)9(ymi /MmeciY0W-e_-( -0,40 (---/L k ' 116),eia._ "i `-vM:i`Jw 1 d --ay; a vrn-Ofito rriw (---72 j , -7,71- -0 .-/-CV caiV ' ,A7/11-) -)/vr 71-0 ‘cr)o) 0?-177Di -- -177/1/ ' .crg2do v ----xx0 p?? -yYf-t2-0,-2-9, 47kr-0-22-i) ry / -11-vigsryildao -ivAl- ---a-fr2-7p---007 ----JT(12 •--swkr _ --- -r-- -----6--fccip L--1E--- ---e-oh -v.)- ---Y0---fo--)-vQ, - • - %- --9-5pLito072 7I9 - f)i2 --7-- ?cn-Pw . . 1-j-17° \ A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING G & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P E TELEPHONE 455-5320-AREA CODE 206 President November 21 , 1989 PLANNWG DMSBON CfTY OF RENTON Mr. Steve Leitzke NOV 2 2 1989 THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS 3600 136th P1 . S.E. , #401 ECO,/" j' Bellevue, WA 98006 Re: Windsor Apartments Day Care Center City of Renton ECF-072-89 and CU-072-89 Dear Steve: Yesterday I spoke with Tina Phillips, the Manager of the Tender Years Day Care facility at the Windsor Apartments. She said the current enrollment is 23 children, including 14 enrolled full time and nine "floaters" . The "floaters" are children who attend day care before and/or after their regular school session, typically during the 6:30 to 8: 00 AM and 3 : 30 to 6: 30 PM time periods . All of these children live in the Windsor Apartments, and most of them walk to the day care center. The current enrollment is substantially more than the enrollment of eight children at the time our traffic study was conducted in August, 1989 . With this increased enrollment of children living in the Windsor Apartments, the enrollment of apartment residents becomes a more significant factor in the traffic analysis . Table 1 of my August 31 , 1989 traffic analysis report shows the estimated total vehicular trip generation for a 3500 square foot day care facility. Assuming full enrollment of 60 children, about 23 children are residents of the Windsor Apartments, and that about two thirds of enrolled Windsor Apartment residents walk to the day care facility, I would expect the new vehicle trip generation due to the proposal to be about 70% of the values shown in Table 1 . Based on these assumptions, the proposal Mr. Steve Leitzke November 21 , 1989 Page -2- to open the day care facility to public enrollment would generate up to about 164 new vehicle trips per average weekday, including about 30 trips during the AM and PM peak hours (about 15 entering and 15 exiting the site during each peak hour) . The adjacent streets, with the traffic impact mitigation recommended in the City' s Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated) , will accommodate this additional traffic. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Otr- ( 7q4' David H. Enger, P.E. Vice President DHE:mb cc: Don Erickson, City of Renton Zoning Administrator ✓ Hong Tan, Primark Corporation • r ' FROM IP E, INC, 11 ,21 , 1989 14:29 NO, 5 F; 1( r . ' k FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL LETTER PLANNING DI VISION CITY OF RENTON • ' NOV 2 1 1989 RECEIVED FIRM C ITy 0 5'077374 DATE / 1 +" ATTEN: j F.) FI l t,► ) ' r�!►es '„ AP ,aP - "Ifia te FAX_ NO. ,r +,, '0 3 We are transmitting 2 pages Including this cover letter. Please calf 455-5320 If you do not receive all pages. J 4 APT', 'DAY c/o, '-Q-72- ...Atsip �� ey.7.2— " COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval As requested Approved as noted . For your use For review and comment Returned for corrections REMARKS: • • COPY TO: Signed. / r--e. ..,.�. Job # : TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 112TH AVE. NE, SUITE 110, BELLEVUE, WA 98004 (206) 455-5320 FAX. NO. 453-7180 FROM TRH, INC, . • 11,21, 1989 1d:29 NO, 5 P, 2 TRANSPORIATiON PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. • 2101 •1 12th AVENUE N,E.,SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 96004 vlciop H BISHOP v E. TELEPHONE 456-6320--AREA CODE 206 ; i Presidum • November 21 , 1989 Mr. Steve Leitzke THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS 3600 136th Pl. S.E: , #401 Bellevue, WA 98006 • . • . Re: Windsor Apartments .Day Care Center _ City of Renton ECF-072-89 and CU-072-89 C L Dear Steve: Yesterday I spoke with Tina Phillips,' the Manager of the Tender Years Day Care facility at the Windsor Apartments. She said the current enrollment is 23 children, ' .including. 14 enrolled full time and nine "floaters" . The "floaters" are children ,who attend day care before and/or. after their regular school session, typically during the 6:30 to 8:00 AM and 3:30 to 6:30 PM time periods. All of these children live in the Windsor Apartments, and most of, them walk to the day care center. The current enrollment is substantially more than the enrollment of eight children at the time our traffic study was conducted in August, ' 1989 . With this increased enrollment of children living in the Windsor Apartments; the enrollment of apartment residents becomes a more. significant factor in the traffic analysis. Table 1. of my August 31 , 1989 traffic, analysis report shows the estimated total vehicular trip generation for a 3500 square foot day care facility. Assuming full enrollment of 60 children, about 23 children are residents of the Windsor Apartments, and that about two,thirds of enrolled Windsor Apartment residents walk to the day care facility, I Would expect the new vehicle trip generation due to the proposal to be about 70% of the values shown in Table 1 . Based on these assumptions, the proposal ' rkUPJ It h, lML, 11 , 21 , 1 14: A NU, V. Mr. Steve Leitzke November 21 , 1989 Page -2- to open the day care facility to public enrollment would generate up to about 164 new vehicle trips per average weekday, including about 30 trips during the AM and PM peak hours (about 15 entering and 15 exiting the site during each peak hour) . The adjacent streets, with the traffic impact mitigation recommended in the City' s Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated) , will accommodate this additional traffic. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 0O- David H. Enger, P.E. Vice President DHE:mb cc: Don Erickson, City of Renton Zoning Administrator eerrrwrrrraurrraarrrrreruurer® PLANNING DIVISION era r mar raemrurrera rrm gqygr rmarueemeaa THE =g ierrrais=sei�°rairr CITY OF RENTON LEITZKE:; = lr ARCHITECTS NOV 9 1 '1989 RECEWED eewrmrrrrrrerr urrrarrerreurearr arrrermmrrrrrrrearseaaaaararemerrr November 20 , 1989 Donald K. Erikson, AICP, Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa 98055 RE: Windsor Place II Daycare - ECF:CU-072-89 Dear Mr. Erikson: I have reviewed your letter dated November 7, 1989 , with regards to the referenced project. As agent for the Owner I can state that we will have no difficulty in complying with the conditions outlined in your letter. Condition C of paragraph 1, regarding the placement of gravel fill sufficient to eliminate abrupt shoulders, may require obtaining slope easements. We will be prepared to discuss this topic at the Public Hearing. -spec ly submitt:i , 404 - _= eitzk- , A.I.A. Eastpointe plaza Suite 4oi 86S9g o i phone 3600-136th place Southeast, Bellevue, Washington g8006 86s 988q fax WWashington State Duane Berentson AO Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007-6538 November 17, 1989 (206)562-4000 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON TO: Don Erickson Zoning Administrator NOV 2 01989 Planning Division Community Development Department '1ECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 SR 900 M.P. 11. 22 C.S. 1712 Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated Windsor Place II Day Care �, File No. ECF; CU-072-89 T " D`,-/ FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Services Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. Our response is checked below. XX We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project is remote and will have no significant traffic impacts on the state highway system. We have already submitted comments on this. project. Our comments are included in our letter dated from to . We have no further comments on this project. We have reviewed the subject document and request the applicant provide further information. We have concerns about the following: Please contact Dick Aust of my Developer Services Section at PHONE: 562-4269, SCAN 638-4269, if you have any questions. DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 • ::: ::: : `>:: : .. .:..... .: ::: :•:::::.. ..:....... . MMgEMMMMFFIDAVI'hgF:;;SE$VLCEgBY:::MA <l' • On the 81i day of K.10V•e.yl , 19.81 '>..,I • <...................... deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing cln,.ck..its % • � cYrvitr��►- y�S • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • • • • (Signature of Sender) S..� �y� � �. S, �:l.-- Subscribed and sworn to me this . day of Vc u 19%Ci No y Public in and for the • • • State__of Washington residing at 1-s.) 1 A,/ ✓ therein. ::::f?:rQ:ject.:Name::;::: .:.::`•::':.>:':::•:.`: :• ':i:::�::;::;•.• •�>•::;:::.•.. ..:: • • • • I � 4, ko �` CITY OF ;" ENTONEnt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division November 8, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on November 1, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED BARBEE MILL DREDGING PROJECT ECF; SME-108-89 Application for maintenance dredging at the mouth of May Creek to remove approximately 2,000 cubic yards of materials and 200 cubic yards of material in the log dump area per year for a five (5) year period. Project is located at 4101 Lake Washington Blvd. North, Renton, Washington. CITY LIGHTS APARTMENTS ECF; SA-087-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 61 unit apartment complex to be located on a vacant 3.3 acre R-3, Multi-Family Residential, zoned parcel. (Note: Density level has been adjusted for greenbelt area located on the site.) Project is located on the east side of. Benson Road between Puget Drive and South 26th Street, Renton, Washington. The. fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on November 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE ECF; £U-072-89 Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. The project is located at 4310 Building "X", N.E. 5th Street, Renton, Washington. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimf!e (206) .235-25'(3 Environmental Determinations November 8, 1989 Page 2 • • II WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS II • ECF; SA-079-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to transform the existing day care center (Building "X") into a maximum of four new residential units. Project is located at 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street (Building "X"). The fifteen (15) day comment period and the fourteen (14) day appeal period for these projects will run concurrently and will end on November 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Since*, , C7/LA-A. onald K. Erickson, AICP� Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp_ cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries • Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation • • • • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: Windsor Place II Day Care DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department • Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority. of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 6, 1989. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period will run concurrently.. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , November 21, 1989, in order to be considered. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 6, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: November 1, 1989 SIGNATURES: enneth E. er Community De ate# ►--. .ent Lynn . G ttman, Director Publi Wo ks Department 1 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Windsor Place II Day Care PROPONENT: The Leitzke Architects ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-072-89 . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the proponent mitigate on-site and off-site circulation impacts as follows: a) post a W-14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Avenue immediately north of N.E. 5th Street; b) post a Type III barricade in the "T" of the intersection of N.E. 5th Street; c) improve roadway on Bremerton Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 5th Street with gravel fill sufficient to eliminate abrupt shoulders on that right-of-way; d) trim vegetation on the northeast corner of Union avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north; and e) post "Day Care Only" sign on the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short-term parking for parents transporting children (provision of on-site parking for day care employees must be made elsewhere in the development) . 2 . That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services . management bond in the amount of $10,200. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. Note: At the time of review of the conditional use permit staff will recommend approval of a a `temporary permit, for a period of two years, and require that the applicant provide an agreement consenting to give service priority to children residing in the Windsor Place Complex during that time period. At the end of the two year pilot period, if the center is pot fully subscribed to byy residents, the conditional use application may be reviewed for either a continuing period of two years or for the granting of a standard conditional use permit, without time limitations. mmdoc ttlY K;�! CITY OF RENTON , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor November 7, 1989 Steve Leitzke East Pointe Plaza • 3600 - 136th Place S.E., Suite 401 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Re: WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE ECF; CU-072-89 • Dear Mr. Leitzke: • • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on November 1, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the proponent mitigate on-site and off-site circulation impacts as follows: a) post a W-14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Avenue immediately north of N.E. 5th Street; b) post a Type III barricade in the "T" of the intersection of N.E. 5th Street; c) improve roadway on Bremerton Avenue N.E. between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 5th Street with gravel fill sufficient to eliminate abrupt shoulders on • that right-of-way; d) trim vegetation on the northeast corner of Union avenue N.E. and N.E. 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north; and e) post "Day Care Only" sign on the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short-term parking for parents transporting children (provision of on-site parking for day care employees must be made elsewhere in the development). 2. , That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services management bond in the amount of $10,200.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of three (3) years. • Note: At the time of review of the conditional use permit staff will recommend approval of a temporary permit, for a period of two years, and require that the applicant provide an agreement consenting to give service priority to children residing in the Windsor Place Complex during that time period. At the end of the two year pilot period, if the center is not fully subscribed to by residents, the conditional use application may be reviewed for either not extending the permit, continuing it for another period of two years, or the granting it without time limitations. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Steve Leitzke • November 6, 1989 Page.2 comment period during `which ..comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end November 21, 1989. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. " Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department)'as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you"to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition,'by the end of the"comment/appeal period, we should be able to establish a• tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary.' " If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:dm cc: Primark 102 - 1200 South 192nd Street Seattle, Washington 98148 ,..:.., .. , .„ H ,..., ,,, , , :,.,, •, ., ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION : . , , ECF; CU-072-89 . APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION • WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS ' Project is located at 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street(Building..:"X") • ree i • ' ., ; ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED • PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL � ACTION. {. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW :4• r COMMITTEE ( E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ': PROPOSED AC TION CTION ❑DOES KDOES . 1.0 NOT ,�i.Iii.H:i . ';,:'i.� ';f'':j HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE j',; ',; • ii ENVIRONMENT. . �•-y`,''` AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILLA/ILL NOT .''1;, BE REQUIRED. 1'.;?.r5 THE CITYRENTON si . ;• ' •;: OF WILL NOT ACT ON THIS ',;' '' PROPOSAL FOR 16 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. '` ^:`` I .: .• ";" COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY November 21, 1989 jl • '':'•.:: : AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY ,' '; 4f BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER _;.'...i BY 5:00 !, P.M•, November 21, 1989 ` ;' '! FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON i:l'-'::q PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. x a .'''•.ii DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ' I `, IWITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - CERTIFICATION I , Mal- Scoiela. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON if— S•- g7 • - ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ! • pp pp residing in R& PAJ , on the ('Chi SIGNED : 'l 4k1 kr:We&. day of OW 1 1 g • 0 •.1 { rt NOTICE / / ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION a. APPLICATION NO. ECF; cu-072-89 PROPOSED ACTION WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand existing day care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Project is located at 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION „A. ' El DOES IADOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE• ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT pis� ❑WILL >WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. =`y COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY November 21, 1989 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAYBE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., November 21, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION \t NOTICE. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued •a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. WINDSOR PLACE II DAY CARE ECF; CU-072-89 • Applicant is seeking a new conditional use permit to expand .existing dare care services for children of residents/employees in order to serve community residents. Project is located at 4310 Building t'A" , N.E. 5th Street (Building "X") . • WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS II ECF; SA-079-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to transform the existing day care center (Building "X") into. a maximum of four new residential units. Project is located at 4310 Building "A", N.E. 5th . Street: 1 • Any interested party may submit written comments; or may appeal the above determination within fifteen (15) days of the publication date: Written comments or appeals will be accepted until 5: 00 PM, November 21, 1989 . Appeals should be specific and shall set forth the reasons. why the particular environmental determination should be reversed. Appeals shall be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, within the fifteen (15) day comment/appeal period. All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the , Current Planning Division of' the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550.. Published: November 6, 1989 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM .J DATE: September 18, 1989 EP 2 0 1989 ; (TO: Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner ,., FROM: Gary Norris transportation Services Manager SUBJECT: Windsor Apartment Day Care Facility Revised Comment Due to limited available roadway right-of-way for Bremerton Ave. NE, which is only 25 feet, it is necessary for us to revise our comment (item 3) in our memo to you dated September 11, 1989. See attachment. Revise item 3 to read as follows: Post "No Parking" signs on Bremerton Ave. NE, west side, to City standards between NE 4th Street and NE 5th Street and place gravel fill along the eastern edge of pavement to reduce the pavement edge drop-off hazard. A sign installation placement drawing to be submitted to Traffic Engineering for approval before installation by Developer. CEM:ad Attachment cc: J. Ralston CEM177 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman,n,�Assistant Planner FROM: Gary Norris,�'�Transportation Services Manager SUBJECT: Windsor Apartment Day Care Facility Traffic Impact Analysis Report As per your request, we have reviewed the above-referenced report. The recommendations that we would adopt or modify are as follows: 1. Post a W14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Ave. immediately north of NE 5th Street. (Same as report recommendation.) 2. Post a Type III barricade in the "T" of the intersection of NE 5th Street and Bremerton Ave. NE. (Changed from report recommendation. ) See attachment. 3. 'n is occurring on Bremerton Ave. NE between NE 4t 5th Streets, t e avement should be widen commodate two-way traffic. Minimum paveme be 8' for parking, 4-2'17- feet for the northbound 1 eet for a d lane for a total of 32,f asphalt crossing section. (Modified from ation.) 4. Trim vegetation on northeast corner of Union Ave. NE and NE 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north. (Same as report recommendation.) 5. Post "Day Care Parking Only" sign in front of the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short term parking for parents picking up or dropping off children. • Employee parking is to be provided elsewhere in the complex. (The underlined part is modified from the report statement.) 6. Item (4) in the report conclusions was deleted. We recommend the above-stated items as conditions for expanding the day care facilities. :ad Attachments CEM170 PLANNING DIVISION ( CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON S E P 1 2 1989 MEMORANDUM i C L EI V E DATE: September 11, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner FROM: Gary Norris,`'OTransportation Services Manager SUBJECT: Windsor Apartment Day Care Facility Traffic Impact Analysis Report As per your request, we have reviewed the above-referenced report. The recommendations that we would adopt or modify are as follows: 1. Post a W14-1 "Dead End" sign on Bremerton Ave. immediately north of NE 5th Street. (Same as report recommendation.) 2. Post a Type III barricadein the "T" of the intersection of NE 5th Street and Bremerton Ave. NE. (Changed from report recommendation.) See attachment. 3. Since parking is occurring on Bremerton Ave. NE between NE 4th & NE 5th Streets, the roadway pavement should be widened to accommodate two-way traffic. Minimum pavement width should be 8' for parking, _L7 feet for the northbound lane and 1- feet for a southbound lane for a total of 30feet of asphalt crossing section. (Modified from report recommendation. ) 4. Trim vegetation on northeast corner of Union Ave. NE and NE 5th Street to improve visibility of the stop sign and increase sight distance to the north. (Same as report recommendation.) 5. Post "Day Care Parking Only" sign in front of the existing parking stalls in front of the day care building to ensure the availability of short term parking for parents picking up or dropping off children. Employee parking is to be provided elsewhere in the complex. (The underlined part is modified from the report statement.) 6. Item (4) in the report conclusions was deleted. We recommend the above-stated items as conditions for expanding the day care facilities. CEM:ad Attachments CEM170 LIZING DEVICES ,1 C. lizing devices are to warn . (C nstruction or maintenance to guide and direct drivers TYPE I BARRICA E VARIABLE 6'. ides and channelizing de- `45 posing requirements. For re/ .4y.e. a ould be constructed in a TYPE OF el for men working in the SUPPORT o he channelization devices VARIES I i M nsition which reduces the 1 e the channelizing devices i .. � ,,., v.. ., ,• ,, • • , vehicle that inadvertently • V e development of a traffic TYPE II BARRICADE control measures in what- oth, safe vehicular move- NOTE: At time provides maximum For dimensions not shown,see Table V un the job. elements in a total system ' iy construction and main- i 1 all be rec e b a sub- /'1 uate in size, number and k '':.(( � \ ,// hick the work is to take // . / `, 4 s: Type I, Type II and \ types are shown in table ther alternate orange and downward at an angle of TYPE III BARRICADE ). The orange and white r 3'MINIMUM i ie intermixed in the same ass a roadway, it is desir- r/'�'//////— N D '7 ie direction toward which h right and left turns are � � .i0rJr2d.r.4 ? ill slope downward in both ' 1 N E ;,,, •ipes shall be reflectorized '. is conditions from a mini- I I I tted by the low beams of r((( ,6 .;;. �.,�., ••.- �. i,y xj I' �t / ; r v, r ,i./,ice! ,E dominant color for other Figure 6-14. Standard barricades. I, 299 11 P,I • ,' 1. C—TRAC:K SYSTEM CITI EN SERVICE REQUEST ENTRY FORM NIL;''I:CE.R FE t'=SON TAKIN±a REQUEST: PAT PHONE (Y/N) MAIL (Y/N) PERSON (Y/N) Y FIRST NAME: N11-::1.I LAST NAME: NISC:O A:D:c"'RESS: RENTON PHLICE DEPT . CITY AHD STATE: T') PE: SIGNS ,r_F':IC:E. F;EOUE STE.L:': THERE': IS_.A..._NEED FOR -TRAFFIC CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF 5TH =. BREMERTON. LOCATION: HERITAGE VILLAGE DEPARTMENT ASSIGNED ACTION: CLINT DATE ASSIGNED: U7/25/89 I:'A T I.". DUE: ii.S/24/R9 I:'ATE COMPLETED: U O/u U/C'U I:'ATE CITIZEN NCOTIF=IEI:': iiii/iiii/iiii DAYS ELAPSED: -32 f f f f f f f 1 f • • \ y) • .?5D • • ......._.. . _ • ,•:,! ...i",:''!1:: :,:::'.:..':';',Y!.:.:',,:',.;..: :"••• • ; - :. .:,. . •.. „.. „.,... .. , , . _ 7. -2 .. .. . . • ,„ . . , • . . . . . „ . . . . . . . . . • . .1 " % • • • . . • . .. , . , • .. . • .. „ , . •, .. . •. ,. . . . . . . . . , . . . • . ' PLANNIn DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 1, ',. FAX COVER LETTER 115), j411.. 2 4. 1989, . .. . . . . • . . . . . .. e 3 ,TO . . . .. . . • • ,,, . . DATE.: ,7 ,, /,,E f . . • , ,., FROM: ..... ..z.i.....,..f.:„,00" . Tender Years Daycare . . 300 Capital Mall Drive SW . . Olympa; WA 46$02 , . . . E° 4. 414q!,brI ( 206) .32-2653 . _ . •. .TO: . . .. . . . .. „ . • . . , . : • . . 16. ,,A,N.am.artorklrima• .,-P-P-•.-17mp• . — , . . ; . P • . , , Total number of pagps , inclUding cover letter: • • „„2_, . • " . Transmitting from a Ricoh Fa460 . - . . If you do npt receive all the pages, please : contact - at . (206) .$52g§68 .' - ' . . .• , • Special ;nstructionst , ---....--• .. . . . . . . . . . . • • ,,. ___„.... - • .— -- . . •. . .. . • ! . • • . . . i • • • . . . . . . • :•,.:;!1 • .•• ., .:_ad laleidN3 :IT 68/ I I . JUL C4 "0'7 l i•3.. tl'ItJHL•U rumL:o I r r .ice $ t i Olympia, Wa, July 24, 198,9 . ; Memo . To:: ° . •enora Blowman . From: Shirley Lapp , Tender Years Schools, Inc . As Regional Director of Tender Years Schools, I am eager to have approval for our..;centerainRenton .to,:acceptchildren from outside The Windsor Apartment complex. I am willing to cooperate to make this workable for all concerned. Some .of the concerns that have been mentioned to me are : Parking: From experience, I have learned that about 25--33% • of our children come from inside the Windsor complex . Many families coming from outside the complx would have 2 or 3 children arriving in 1 vehicle . As most of the staff members have limited income, they tend to use public transportation. I believe that the 10 parking stalls allotedto us are adequate. these parking spaces will be posted with, "Daycare Parking Only" signs. . Our Olympia Tender Years center has been in operation for two years , now and has 7 designated parking spaces and 3 drop off spaces , We have not found this to be a problem. This center is licensed for 74 children. Traffic: Our facility opens at 6 A.M. and closes at 6: 30 F.M. ' Our experience is that children arrive, gradually, between 6 and 10:30 A.M. They tend to begin to leave about 3:30 and the major- ity are gone by 6:20 P.M. This spreads the traffic out over . a three hour period in the morning and afternoon . It has been suggested that children arriving by car, follow a set traffic , pattern. We would be happy to follow any pattern suggested by the city, There is a great need for. Daycare of the; ivali.,ty which we offer in this area. We have a waiting list' of ::children wanting in . Thank You For Your Assistance, • ' i ,..„„ef--24 / „ - PRIARK• MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. I L.i1tr1;l::.f Uivr�ICt. CITY OF FIENTON J U L 2 5 1989 July 24, 1989 Mr. Donald Erickson City of Renton Zoning Administrator . 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 . RE: WINDSOR PLACE APARTMENTS 4310 BUILDING A N.E. 5TH STREET CU 072-89; SA 079-89 The management of The Windsor Apartments is very interested and concerned regarding the outcome • of the application for expansion of the day care center located on the property. This letter is written to provide you with input from the staff and residents prior to your review of this application. We are aware that in the event the request for expansion is denied, the property owners have requested permission to. convert the existing facility into additional apartments. In developing this property and the initial marketing program, a strong emphasis was placed on providing a close- knit community atmosphere for families and adults . The day care center played a significant role in our marketing, and many residents chose to live here based on the convenience the day care center offered. For some families, this was the primary reason they chose to move to our community. Residents with children currently enrolled in the day care are concerned that in the event the day care expansion is not approved, and the facility is converted, they would lose their enrollment and forced to seek other arrangements for child care . Parents are upset because as September approaches., daycare centers reach capacity and families are then placed on a waiting list. Parents have expressed their increasing concern regarding the absence of other day care in the area that duplicates the quality of the program offered by the Tender Years School. • Imo S. 1,12r1r1(Stmr`t, Suitt, 102, 5rattly, Wrichinrtnn 9131413 • I LI;ViCfOR Of iY OF fsEPv1ON .'?i JUL 2 5 1989 MR. DONALD• ERICKSON PAGE TWO ' • : •,• f� CITY OF RENTON JULY 24, 1989 The rental office continues to receive inquiries from • • persons concerning both the •apartments and the availability of the day care. Although some choose other housing in the area, they remain strong candidates for the day care program in which to enroll their children. Other persons who have shown a strong interest in the day care are current and prospective homeowners in the area. The current situation has also created a marketing hardship • • in working with persons who have rented or are considering renting based on the availability of the day care . Some prospects are now reconsidering living at The Windsor. If we are unable to guarantee that the center will continue to operate, there will be a negative impact on the family community which we have been working to establish at The Windsor, which we believe is in the best interest of the City of Renton. Sincerely, • Thomas W. Ichelson • President Ci. CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 13, 1989 • Mr. Steve Leitzke 19500 Pacific Highway South #203 Seattle, Washington 98148 RE: Windsor Place Apartments, 4310 Building "A" N.E. 5th Street CU 072-89 , SA 079-89 • Dear Mr. Leitzke: I am writing this letter in order to clarify the City's evaluation process for the above-referenced projects. The City will be conducting a simultaneous review of both your requests to expand the existing day care center and, in the event that such an expansion is not approved, your request to convert the center into an additional four apartments. We are aware that it is your first preference to continue to offer day care at Windsor Place --. but are conducting a simultaneous review of both applications in order to expedite resolution of this matter. I am aware that the posting of the site for site plan approval for the conversion of the day care center into apartments has caused some confusion among residents of the complex generally, and among those using the day care center particularly. As I have explained to you and to others who have inquired about the project, 'City regulations require that we post for site plan review; there is no such requirement for conditional use permits. I do regret any misunderstanding which may have been caused. I will make certain that further postings, notices and publications more clearly reflect applicant preference and provide more extensive information about City procedures. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Steve Leitzke Windsor Place Apartments July 13 , 1989 Page 2 If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, 7 fin Lenora W. Blauman Senior Planner LWB/lb cc: Primark • 102-1200 South 192nd Street • Seattle, WA 98148 • • • • • • • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTOonntni REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C(A rre ft fAL' DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing / ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° / 14 . Transportation ,�// ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: Yuo We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. won) .`U\ R - Signature Diretor or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : CU 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 n • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW. SHEET 'J'`' ;-;'3 ,iiYLii'kENi'U!9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Lv nj Rot63€ , '$.' . I. JUL 7 1989 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: ' July 20), 198,91F n S (L) II EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 0 ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ' ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources -- ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 0 O O ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° " ', • PLANNh11G DIVISION 11. Light & Glare 0 : CIIYOPRENTON 12 . Recreation ° JUL °Q 7 1989 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ` i R E�'F o I ° 14 . Transportation ° ' l 0 ° 15. Public Services ° I 0 ° o : j 0 0 16. Uti�i ° o COMMENTS Ves `� �,'--e .�� �<i O�cP�Ge. .��� " :r -Le - --'--Q_. �..21 i"it' le-e-"2-12` /( O "ce- Ceee G4"Q er - , --4 .� .moo Xe ellgre rViewed this a "7icaC t'ion it pp particula atte tion to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed-to properly assess this prop. /--- 1- r- --.------ ---------j f' •1 , . ' / ll '.--- ‘---- (719 Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : : CU,, 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day; Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 r • . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET�U �° n t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: B U I I U 1 ,4',' '�1: .' 4 ' , i® 4yA • ?r, DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989) 9 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 ' . ' is . . PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke ' ' PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the. community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. ' The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the , service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. . LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ; IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ' 1. Earth 0 , ° ° 2 . Air • : °• j: ° ° ° 0 0 3 . Water . • ° • ° o ° 0 4 . Plants • ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° ° . ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° • . 9. Housing 0 .!, X ° ° , , \ 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 0 11. Light & Glare . ° �•', • ° 12 . Recreation ° ° . . 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 • 14 . Transportation ° ' ' ° 15. .Public Services `'1 : 0 ° , 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: I�I • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needjed.;.to properly assess this proposal. sty / . llri .. - . /.../.0i,y, . . Signature o Director or thorized Representative Date ,: .,. Rev. 6/8 8 • • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : '.CU: 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day. Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the. community. The day. care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is 'currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use: In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units.` LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION , PLANNING DIVISION. • SHORT RANGE i. LONG RANGE ;' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ; OTHERS: ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN- WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 15zi ZJe APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _ NOT APPROVED • r. • r l E : DATE 7—/ O'/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' /` REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pa r Gt in ' R bGI'eG - v'f DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989, EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89.. 1 L C® 1. 69 \ny\ PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke • PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care 6 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing. Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. is 4' LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° O 0 ° 2 . Air ° °—" 0 0 3 . Water 0 0 ° 4. Plants 0 fj1 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health , 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 o O O 9 . Housing 0 , 0 0 O , O 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 0 ° 12. Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° •' ° 14 . Transportation ° ' � ° ° 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ° • COMMENTS: 45 ca,+ev-w t,v- o f CI cti 1.Ar k '.I 0_1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. "7/7 YY7 Signature f Director or Auth ized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 MID RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ;i-, d q((��Q tyl ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : CU .072-89 ; .); 3 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day. Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center' to 'serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable: The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I . . APPROVED APPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • j: • e i.. i l ' DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 PLANNING DIVISION RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S E 1L' VP 1989 R , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U 1--i �) I I( �is '1 v`. r vi DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20T 1989 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : .CU-072-89 , PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : , IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ,, 0 ° o 0 ° 2 . Air ° o ° 0 3 . Water ° o ° 0 4. Plants ° " ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ; ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources : ° ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ' ° 0 9,. Housing ° ' ° 10. Aesthetics ° o . ° ° 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° ° 12. Recreation . ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ' ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ,, , ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° '`1 ° 0 ° ° 16. Utilities 0 .1 ° COMMENTS:1\ UM"' 4 w UHf5 Fen WiMOSO. 'Pu►cE (ate WHU 4 1WS COUveZkielq is 9Fa-t oc-2 fsmit. 1401 slyer.) AccEPTEO si TEE Cer AT TE ?RfSEOS T11-te. t mE mum cHAI. D5in 1OES n1oc izEcomme00,: ru(TFiEQ it?1oV ME&3TS tJ� wIli11H '(Me SU€stet Si-rfc vvriI 1►ie ggovlle whi & F} g0,01- ihotoU rests Aft ' \\\ wormy RI, vo On. t Su9 red p¢ouT y .N us ms v r,ew SewEar no a.AT o givek A tea►. We have review d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I Azati.j.._ .� f s77 Signature of Director or/ 1horized Representative Date , :` Rev. 6/88 , RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : ` CU;' 072-89 . PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units.' LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY •DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: / l . / APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS D NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT1701 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER . C:7-0,2 a ( �_!- �' - . �� LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEVER - } SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER Wit. fI,2 • 3s�.So.eO �G 7�3 � ��f�2 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEt'1U1: a nt- �� . `!z ' G � SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA E6, "?E-UM 3 ' 1 . pug > `3.5oD°X SPECIAL ASSESES1T lte ; f'-' -E-r.., . l, -' of 'U�l at/ * Watt Lusts FoR rt. w 4 400.°9 �_ � /�' � :lulNOSo� TEAM ,�{t,vf Nf�'[' gEErJ APPROVED WATER PUL 1 �t�csc Q &l�ifdi:A 'F cgrrED t3'i tM� Giti AT me QREsf*� ED SEWER I �itsIof 2 WILED TiMe-• �[G1 CY,-..0,ED FIRE Ilai�:'... - - NU iHPftwettEr'r oe fooVrrioA -to E,' y` O K -niT :Sttestor 91203 SNAW Bt Bo►sE f Tm _..— `luGaTi- 1,€ AA3ovE Ul U ifS Atte 10 0 AccEvrE0 8Y •11e tiful.Qi ! ,L DATE 7— 20 - F9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0'/A9)THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 i ' , t U . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST;REVIEW;,SHEET ode: 0 SI- • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5 I-0\CM �a' "' �a . ;.y, 1"' i DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: ' July 20, 1989 Nip EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 . : ' PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT ,TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: .Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the .community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : ' • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° , ° - ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 0 . 3 . Water ° ° ° 4. Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals. ° ° 0 ° • 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ' ° 7. Environmental Health • ° ° . ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° °-' 0 ° 9. Housing ° s ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° .0 . ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ' ° 0 12. Recreation ° i ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ' ° 0 ° ° ° 14. Transportation ° ' { ° 15. Public Services ° c1 ° • ° • ° ° 16. Utilities ° 'I ° COMMENTS: rlahC We have reviewed this application with' particular attention to those areas ' in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is neededto properly assess this proposal. .., : _ 77A ri .--1 -- '''' ' . 7.////r9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : ;CU` 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place ApartmentsDay, Care . . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 3brm lkka ) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ' I . DATE 7/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW. SHEET ° N`' o • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POLtC.X7 ;' f �(/� , .14Fa'�'wOly DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 198 aA;.. u(9:9 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 . PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke • PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 0 ° ° 3 . Water 0 ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° 0 9 . Housing ° 0 . 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12. Recreation ° O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O O O 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services 1✓ ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: aaw • n, pcmgmc r vulkpuh:ofts) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature o irect or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) CU, 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke F, PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day, Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing daycare services for children of residents through the creation of a — commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event -that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units.; LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: r,. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT " BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: liA, ' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED VU"?,(Cai . :-FUJORNLY/ pr4civytk aAk-Kovu. • l DATE v q SIGNATURE OFP.tniuViitrz%Out-4 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,,,' REV. 6/88 I 4110 !ill RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MY OFREN6.ON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST;REVIEW;SH T JUL,. 7 1989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I'i‘r e s. }� ni_E DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. ; . LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR . INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° 2 . Air 0 0 ° O ° 0 3 . Water ° 0 0 4. Plants ° o ° 0 5. Animals ° o ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° 0 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use ? ° o ° 0 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ` 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° O 15. Public Services -%J7/o,gcrT ' ° ; 0 ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° 0 00MMENTS: tereki 1 Sze ' '4 $ —7d,/s ocO4,,o - l' e/gee' ,ems' /i /s t E .(Ic E,4i ' ,sC e s 9 2' ,yo /%'6e° We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 ID - ill FI\NN1ND DIVISION , RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CjIY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SH .Tj j ?, 1989 ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) CU" 072-89 riSi E c !.0, �,,� E L . PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day, Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units.', LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT [' SCHEDULED ERC DATE: r ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION : SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU , POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. ? BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 REVIEW DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ° I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l;,�Fr tii;, ts•, , 4r.. ' 4 ____4V40-r— Z-r `` DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED"REPRESENTATIVE :. , '!' REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cl))-o0it ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `eiz a p• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e V\ 1 V\Per(�l �0 z,`989 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 41,474,. EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 3 . Water �C ° 4 .. Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities I �( COMMENTS: I� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. P-A4M7' . 1-11 or ✓ :41 431-%11 Signature of Direc or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 /2 _ . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ` • • .i DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW'SHEET ECF-072-89 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : .,CUf; -072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke • PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments payf. Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks' approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the. community. ' The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. " It is currently .undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to 'serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using' the service) would be a conditional use. In. the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units.+:: LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street TO: { PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU r' POLICE DEPARTMENT is COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -' BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: .COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lj1r1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED i • r. DAT iy .4/Lg 6P SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ..' REV. 6/88 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JOo" ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHa v'9en REVIEWING DEPARTMENT il G r{2I C -� DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: July 20, 1989 EFC-072-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke JUL 1 7 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° . ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 ° . ° 9 . Housing ✓ ° ° 10. Aesthetics ' ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation • �° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ✓' ° 16. Utilities l/ ° COMMENTS: A+ % c.,,ae.G:5r ,-? /5 C'$f ,..- p an , i.„,e4c.,r 4a7 c,s-,0 'w yam,, e ce'' -e-• 72 U 7-7l; 7"'4 - 1 a 1.�e 14 r--c::.s.r---.6 4 4-Pt; f yam-. &'Sam • Ou-t Sick' fv a 14 6 Yh a 9 he O deG.+1oYId kc' 4E,k. ,tvi,,1 7 ' S. 1,mile1,1-"5 , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is e .ed to properly assess this 0 propos/al. d - (-. , Signature of Director or A horized Representative 'Da r ate Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET p i ECF-072-89 APPLICATION N0.(S) . : `;-CU1, 072-89 PROPONENT: Steve Leitzke ,!, PROJECT TITLE: Windsor Place Apartments Day:Care BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval to expand existing , day care services for children of residents through the creation of a commercial day care center to serve the: community. The day care center for residents was mandated by the Hearing Examiner as a condition of approval of the residential complex. It is currently undersubscribed and not economically viable. The proposed expansion to serve approximately 60 children (including the approximately eight children currently using the service) would be a conditional use. In the event that this conditional use is not supported by the City, the applicant will seek to convert the day care center into four apartment units. LOCATION: 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU is POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ' - SHORT RANGE i. LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 'j OTHERS: '� r COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 20, 1989 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 14 C /A1 EP .)AV /\/ fj APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED NO At c- Q,> �e ,, F e671 .4-P-, fek0 40, eJ?_, 7 " DATE . c;1 j I ,e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT,I IZED REPRESENTATIVE f' _ REV. 6/88 CITY OF RENTON - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 5, 1989 Mr. Steve Leitzke 19500 Pacific Highway South #203 Seattle, Washington 98148 Re: Windsor Place Apartments Day Care Expansion 4310 Building A, N.E. 5th Street CU 072-89 Dear Mr. Leitzke: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on July 26, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner and project manager for this project, at 235-2550. Sincerely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/mjp cc: Primark 102-1200 South 192nd Street Seattle, WA 98148 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 -410 . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM July 5, 1989 TO: Reviewing Staff ( . FROM: Lenora Blauman SUBJECT: Windsor Place Apartments ,; As you may be aware, the City recently approved the Windsor Place Apartments project, a 202 unit residential complex. The complex is completed and is currently 75% occupied. Among other amenities, the complex is providing a day care center for children of residents as required by the Hearing Examiner. The center is designed to accommodate 60 children, however, at present only,`eight children are enrolled. The proponent finds that operation of the day care under these circumstances is not viable, and he is requesting that the City either: 1) allow a conditional use permit to permit the day care center to enroll children who live outside of the complex (CU 072-89) ; or 2) provide site plan approval to allow the conversion of the day care center to four living units (SA079-89) . Application materials describing and discussing each of the above-listed alternatives is attached. Please evaluate these alternatives individually, and also tell me which you believe is the more appropriate of the two options. Thank you for your assistance. LWB:mj p -- • r. L Il cJ�) (.. II I 1 .) I ( 41r%, i :,`1\1 I 0 .1 '1 • 111.1. )IU(S) 1 C(A'+o 1's UUILUINC:a & !t)tlli I(,; IIL_I'/+�1I"fML�J (' c0�, $� I: ♦ ..0 • tIOIE 10 ArPLT(:AIII : 51nr.r• 1111,1 to n revlrtelrr•nnlvt! 9p1tcaliori form, only those "itew Krl 1t Ti.n your nl r.clflr fyl,e c,r rhp('llc:ol.Jr'rc(n) ore to bn coa>{,1eted, ' (Ploaor, 1r,'lrrl nr. I�I,r AUr,<:lr n'Icllf.lc cciI hliooto if ,K+<:nangry,) • f'•1'LIC�NT. 'I�`�1�.I: Of= AI I�LICATION NAME _� __ .4-2_ L -1_"Z K E AI�-�-k(T E(--z J FEES I ADUIZESS _._.. .. I NLZ(NII:" Ff2(hA TO ) 19 fx� •P.Aci FtG «i I W.a.y �. 9�'3 - CItY ----- - - ItI I. _-.1 Il.)10I2ARt I1:f?1,111" t_06..-rrLe.....- 1 kAi'e.- 101E?) (J41)1.110N1Al. lfiE• rl:11.11.1" - • 1ELEI'IIOIJf .._.-_... ';1 IE f'I AN' At-1'RUVAI. 52 091 G- _..-.=.1 III(3IAl, ['E:1)11I I ION 1:11/11)€ AND F ILL. - [. • No, of Cubic Yards l__-� All(:E: CUN'1T,\CT 1'EfZSCN ' ir<arl Sect.f.o„: . . NAME • '-""""" I Jn;I.tcicallon Iiecµr.LreJ AbUf?L5S I�� i:...,.l:?.; .`ilJ)IUIV(:�IUII:;: OBK �.e I�,�cl rL • /I �__._1 IrIIIAIIV[: hfIVI� �� --- -- ---- -- - 1_._.) r ItGI ,[Id1NA(IY rLAI Srl� • 4o I , IELr r1u)IIE w._ . ..... ,, (.11 [Jflrail.irn, I?c-1ulKrcl) ��� OWNEU1 I 1111' _. ... . . . I I f,1 I Ih"i I?(,1<./1A-214 . Af)(?I2E:i5 i'L./oilit.O ull l t UE:VEL01.1d(-Ill :. ' ' l02--- I2 ------— ( ( 11,nnCI1y � ! l I - � � /�` rJ t" t; ! e,,..? • j. _ - -- -�- -.._ • lELEPIIOIE n , 1 I .,.I I. ..I ! I. I",IIII I fir,: t hf,F(; r lurEr,1Y At/AMISS • ` • L13td �3uI�Dl►` la•�:. >� I I I' 111 t 1'�I: EXISTING USE (...-..1 I i.l t IL'.Ilt,;l' 1'IIr Ill i nll l l l(. • Q. ' PItJI'OSLU ll;L IltItilIat (F SPACES:. • E.] f IIVIit(HIt.lL171A1 REVIEW COMdIT1EE -_ I_I l,a- - TOTAL FEES FlAh ci1.YO i, •ki 4 TAFI' USE WILY -- ADMINISTRATIVE' i'ft()CESSIIa(3• • E)A t E S 1 A1.4' . • • Arrl_ICn1101' f2ECf.[VEU EIY, . . JUN 6 1989 . Al'I'L1(AllOI! t)r.l(I2(.Ilrlr:a TO DC.: 1_...] ,,„ ,nrl,l,•,„ NoI-lftral.Jon Seat On - ' By: ---------.-. _ _ _ (Inlllu1) UAIEROU1lh Al hl l l(cllAl. IIAIEI!1,11, I)t:(E1VIP IIY: - ` • A1'19.0' n l J 011 I?f.i t ICI 1 1 111. ) 1 O 11E:; • • • L.-_] rnc.nwp1„I0, Noll.flc(II ion ,gent On , By: ''';`' ' a —,-. . - -- - - (Initials) . RUUIEU T0: • „ \ 1�1 EIullding �_ b(•.;Icln Incl. [.._.� I1) r 1'o1-ke, . FF I;: ml IY I'riLlt e I,_.1 ti c ,. ,, ti.,., t_,..1 r`—1 ... .. . - . . • . .... . .. .. . -------------___ . ... • . •.' •' •., . • . ..... .-.:..-:______:____-------.....--_____---------.:-.--.-------------.,------7-------'---- --:-------------L__.______..._,.__..---- - .•' , ,. • •.•.;: • . ., : • . . • . . .• . „ t,. • . -----,----7.----_________•______-_____________ • . ....... ., . . . •• . • , . - • - - ... , • - • , . .., . . • • AFFIDAVIT• ' • • . . • • • . . , . . . . . , • • i...: .. - :•;.... . . • - . • . . . I, ........_,:;- .-1cg )--..L.a.1..,_.. ....a_z__Kci,.,_ being duly sworn, declare that I am • .•:•.:-:".': ilauthorLied representative to act for the properly owner, EDOwner.of-the property Involved, • - In•thls application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the •:, :•', - ; ' ' • Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge • and belief. . . . • k , ... SUBSCRIBED AND swonri TO BEFORE ME Ti IIS . •. . , .„.. .. . . . . . . . . , . .. . . ...._ 2-..... •DAY OF —1 • - • • . . .. . . . . . . • 19.E.1_: . •• . . • ' . • • . . . • . . ; NOTARY PUE1LIC IN AND FOR TI•IE STATE OF • . . .. • . • . . • .. . . .. • - WASHINGTON, — ' RESIDING AT • . , • • • . . . ,,,,.. .-.-... • •. • .. . • ._......: • . • • . • ... . ..• . . • • . . • • : .... - - ' .) _ . ,, ri....4.— c.) .. • . . . .• , ( arise of Notary Public) •. . • - ( ure of Ow er) ...._ ... . - . .... . . • ' . . • 5.• Z03 :.' - - - tiz_zz___..:. i.Le_.. ,..211,clei)-3z)(-/ ,-)'r .i / - • _.11.5. 5.C2___P__:4A1=Y-___-__A`".._ ___. - . . ._ (Address) (Address) • • • , , .. . . .: • ...... . .. ,. . . ... • , " I (State) (Zip) . . . . , .. . . . • 0112- . . . . . cro,phon() , . . . . • • Acceptance of this application and required filing tee• does not constitute a complete •.i r :. • . • applICation. Plans and other materials required II, cone.titute a complete application are listed In . :. . • the "Application Procedure," ., . : . . ... . . . • • . . . . . .•.- - . . . • • . • • . . . .. . . . . Poi-In:11174 . • ..:,'''.• • . . . . . • . . • IFlII E • DESCRIPTION TRACT 1: . -- • I The North 200 . 12 feet of the East' I.71 :; l they East 1./2 of the. Southwest ::; r-; 1/�t � of ahe Sc1IIt: ve; t . �i �> (' I;ior.1 . :1.0 , Township 23 North', Range 5 ha:;t: W. M. . • EXCEPT the blest: 130 . 08 feet thereof ; : F Situate-- in the City of '_.E nt ,.'-r1, I;t: Linty :if !( .i.n , State of Washington 1 r ' TRACT 2 : - The Northeast :L/4 or the J o:r: I:her,cc+t.: '101 ,r(: t:he Sout:J1.Yrent: 1/(i . ;vf. I• the Southwest 1/4 of:' Section ,110 , Totm hLp 3 North , . Range ' 5 . . j East W.M. _ . EXCEPT the Noy tli 20(1 ,.:1.2 . ,i r�r� 1. ; • ' AND EXCEPT. the West 130 . 0q. feet: ; . ! I • Situate in the 1;ityo of Renton , (;nu'it:y of King , ;1; ELe of Washington. TRACT' I : -. . . _.... - . . The' South 3/4 •of the East: 1/2 Of t:liu East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 • • . of. the Southwest 1/4 of Section: 10 , Township 23, North, Range 5 . East W.M. 1 . EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to King County' under King `• County �Recording Nos . 5738287 and 57382891 - . .. . Situate ' in the City of Renton, County of .King; State of Washington. NORTH HALF OF WEST HALF OF EAST BALE" OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF• .SOUTHWEST GUAR TER OF SECTION 1(), TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WI LLAMETTE 1 • MERIDIAN, IN KING) COUNTY, E•Jr,E:;t11NG1ON; f' EXCEPT THE NORTH 26E1, bU FEET THEREOF: TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS 15 FEET 41 WIDTH OVER THt ,.- WEST HALF-OF THE .SOU-THIE AS f. OUAE2 TER OF THE; SOUTHWE S 1• GUAR TER OF THE ' SOUTHWEST !iUARTEI? OF SliCTIUN' 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,' . . I: ' WILLAME:'ITE MERIDIAN, IN WING 'CHUN'I'Y, WASHINGTON, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH I, - IS DLLSCRIBEL AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THEt�nurHt)li�:, l CURIII::I OF SAID SE;C I IUN 1UI THENCE SOUTH. 8© DEGREES o2 '4,3" •E:/tn-I' 021 . 20 FE ETr THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 17 '22" NE IT 20 FEET 10 POINT OF IlEEGINNINGi• • THENCE NORTH 0'' IEGRE ES . 17 '32" to 9T E,26, 76- FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID. • SUBDIVISION, 1...' • i t'i tJ.; • - • ' ' v yip.. • • $` (1F • ,.••-•;•:.1),;,: A. '' ..?, .. • • • • ELF:' .M9;7-7 ',,,,:;,i,Vi. ,;(..) . • tO 412• z City of 6M • • • o • CHECKLIST •$9 ENVIRONMENTAL L � CL w,r OP, ' ;,,co •' SEP � ` '`,,. • Purpose of Checklist:. 1 "; :±` The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAL chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all 1 .A. ;,;*,,` governmental.agencies to consider the environmental impacts of• a proposal before'making ;i;•;iii•i•''• ' '"'i ?• ' decisions. - An environmental im act..statement (EIS) must be' g 'l:',%', •%r .' :.'; P prepared •for allproposals '',;i'':�+,; with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. `�l t•''' of this checklist is is to The purpose,;. � . . :�,:";;;•. f':':its:'9;` • ` provide information to help from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the. roposal agency itncan..be doriey s . and to, help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. p P ) 'v ': '., _ Instructions.for Applicants: • • , This environmental •checklist asks you to describe scime basic information about . proposal.___. Governmental agencies use 'this checklist to determine - whether •the '` ','; . environmental Impacts .of your proposal are significant, requiring ;+` Answer,the questions briefly, with,.the, most precise information known, or'g vefthe. best . I : description you'can, • - ' : You• must answer each question ace"urat.ely and carefully,,' to the best of your €'; { ' knowledge. In most cases, y' ' you should be able to answer the questions fron your own " • observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If•you really do not know ��i''�'��` the answer.' • . ,'• �,:.'• , or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does . _ =>•0:? ;;' not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. :t , i,'; Some.questions ,ask about governmental regulations,, such as zoning, shoreline, and ,,:;: landmark designations. Answer' these questions If you can. if:p'„•;'`' • governmental agencies can assist you, you have problems, the The checklist y questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if You plar, to do •i.':•,,.•. them .over.. a period of 'time or on different !=•'',; information that will help describe :Your parcels of land. Attach any additional �; Y proposal or its environrnenlal effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide ;;,- ;-, : . .additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be •significant. adverse impacts, • ' " Use of Checklist for Non project Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) ',' , , Complete this checklist for nonproject' ' ' proposals, even though",;i`• •answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL-SHEET aFbR • '•' ' :; NONPROJECT ACTIONS ), ..,: (part D !,)•il+) •. For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), -, ; ' ` the references in the checklist to the words " "Project. applic:ant," and "property :.' • ' `•` ` or site". :,.�,, , should be read.as "proposal," "proposer,"rand "affected geographic area," respectively., .. . .. :,• ' :it' • A. BACKGROUND . . . . �.h,1 }„ 1. Name ofproposed • ;ti . t°4:: Windsor project, if applicable: • : Place 'Apartments - • ` .,;, • Daycare Center rt;: i;. 2. Name of a . .i, applicant: ' Pri mahk C • , ,,,,.'.. orporation '.ti; ';,. . 3• Address and;:.; ' ,I• phone number of applicant and contact person:i r Lei tzke Architects „. " 19550 Pacific Highway South, #203 .. •_,ii; Seattle <•<' " .. 4• Date checklist prepared: •y, June 2, 1989 .. x:'�;],;, 5. Agency requesting checklist: ,,;m ,:;,: , .'. City of Renton • • - •.• . .. 6•' Proposed timingor ,,,;•; schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ' •1`��t,', . The 9i'; ••, project i s completed and the units are -occupied. (75q) '' - Recrapartment units _. Recreation Building. A,. r ;i.r;; - Daycare.. Building , 'n,�::(,; i; '1 PLANNING '' ''1r'; ,.. • • CRY OF DNIBIQN '.' ji • REM . ), ff Sri. ;.ii, , ,.. .... .JUN• 6 1989' • 4; • HECEI ■ • 'r,,A!,.,it,.,,.' ;., 7• Do You have any plans for future addition, ex ansions, 'or further:act . -;• , ; to or connected with thisproposal? P ivity related '`' No if yes, explain. ' �`,:; .. i T 9. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or , ., be prepared, directlywill ,: ,•" •. . : related to"this proposal. ,' '! ;r, . Environmental, review ew for Windsor P1 ace Apartments ' 9:. ,,�=; Do you.know whether applications are pending ,; ;:•.'. for'governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ' :,,'� . Ne List any governmental approvals • ,' Rf ,f ` � � lf�known: Alternate A: onditionalrUsiesP�rat rmit fober daeeded�for•your proposal, � :•'11 require a conditional use permit for the"daycare bpi lding"to 'permit re: center. Tchildrhe rensefromi.l,1 -:,: ,,' the surrounding ne•i ghborhood§ to use the-faci 1 i ty, Alternate B:, Site :plan a roval , -',:, " : for;-apartments. The proposal will require a site plan approval ;to convert they �. rr -care,facility into apartments. See attached sheet. • day-':;; ,' 1 I: Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and d the size of the project and site. There are several. questions later In this checklist . �.,•, ,., ;: ;' that ask you to describe certain aspects of ' ' '-"! repeat those answers on this page, p your proposal. You do not need to See attached sheet. :,l • • 12. Location of the . ;. 1; proposal: Give sufficient information for a person to understand ' . the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and • section, township, and range if known. ,If 11 proposal would occur over a range of •' area,. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, • site plan, vicinityma • p, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, -you are not required'to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any checklist: The project 1 i es within secti n 10r,rntownit ishi�pa23 applications range 5 east,� ` The site is comprised of 4 parcels approximately 7.12 acres .53 acres 5 W.M; . : ; 1. and 2,89 acres. The project lies north of NE 4th St, .is bounded on the Eastabres, : ;; �;; unimproved Bremerton'..Ave NE. and lies approximately 600 ft East :of Union. st: ••NE 5th •,M street is improved to the westerly 'boundary of the' site. Our proposal would al . '+; ; a continuation of NE 5th street through the property' to Bremerton Ave•NE, The low '.'i'I'''' . daycare' address is 4310 Building A NE 5th. `'�'' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS '?;:; I. EARTH `� a• General description of the site (circle ono); flat, rollin. hilly, steep ; ; ', . slopes, mountainous, other b• What is the steepest slope on the site a '' : 15% (approximate percent slope)? ::,;�' c What general t • ypes ypes of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,: - :, ;; {: gravel,' peat, muck)? you �.,. If know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland.. ;'. 1;r • d• Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate '� .'',. vicinity? If so, describe. None is . a: 2 — I •I e. Describe thn purpose, type, and approximate quantities' of any filling or ,.'."; •.-: , grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. : a':,'.. • There will be no grading or filling. ' ,'•:; f. Could erosion' occur `as a e' ,;f,,;,,;, • result of clearing, construction; or; use? If' so, ;,; •• ' generally describe. ,., <<.' NA ;'' 'r g. About what percent of the site will he covered with impervious surfaces • after project construction (for example,:asphalt'or buildings)' • No additional impervious surfaces are proposed •. :.,• • . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other Impacts to the :i`' : ;', earth, if any: . " NA • s' ' • 2. . .. AIR ?;;:ii ' . a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.; ;,_. ..<t':!::ii;' . ' dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and „ '',! when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give - '.4;, - 1 approximate quantities if known. : . - The completed project will have automobile exhaust 'emisssions consistent with'' this type of development. • ,, b, Are there any off-site sources of emission? ' • None ne - c. Proposed measures to_reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, If any: There should be no additional im• pacts. • 3.. • WATER .:. ' a. • Surface: • • • • iy I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round rand seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If'appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. • • The souterly portion of the site receives off site water from adjacent pr•opert -- -- Water flows through the existing detention system•and exits under the' existing road through a 24" concrete pipe. - • 2) Will the project reyulre anywork over, in, or adjacent to ' within 200( feet) • ' the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans: • . No • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site ' ' that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: , None ; ;', • -- 3 - • t2• " ,',`',' "t ,4). Will:.the.proposal require surface water .withdr..,...11s or diversions? Give , :. 'z•:;:• ,• - general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. • . �-.i; No - 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on `' the site plan. No . 6) Does the proposal .involve any discharges of waste material$ to surface waters? If so, describr� the type of waste and anticipated volume of ''�'''`�' discharge. • No b. Ground; • • 1) Will grr ind water be withdrawn. or will w itei bo disc:haJQe(J to ground water? Give general description, purpose, orul appaoxirnately quantities if known. - Nq 2) ' Describe waste: material that will be discharged Into the ground :from ` septic tanks or other sources, if any. (for example: Domestic:. sewage: ,, ' _ • industrial, containing the following chemicals , . ,; agricultural; etc.). • Describe the general.side of the system, the number_ of such. systems, the ` • •• • number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or • - humans the system(s) are expected to serve: - , NA . . - . ,,,,,, c: Water Runoff (Including storm water): :s`'''; : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of " collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, If known). Where will - n„ -this water.. flow? :Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe: The detention facility will not be affected b the proposal " ' i; • 2) Could waste materials enter,.,, : ground 'or surface waters? If so, generally • describe. No . • . 4 _ 1 - d. Proposed-measures to reduce or control surface ,,- , ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: . No 4. Plants ;s, .•; • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ii deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other - • , •• Elevergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ' i Shrubs -. !fi grass crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ;', ;' ci water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil,�other ' other types of vegetation .i,':`' • b. What kind and amount or vegetation will be removed or altered? - --' None . - ' . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: •:.' t',' ': . None known . d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other moasures to preserve • r er Nance vegetation on the site, if any: see landscape plan. Landscaping materials such as- -' - Evergreen trees were used to enhance vegetation. l.andscapin shr bsband • . enhanced. . 9 e 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site ', , or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle,6 n�Qblrct�'other Robins Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other P onlT e V :, .b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on'or near the site. , None • • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain:' No :. - 5 - -. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhanG 3.vvildl''1 e, if an • ' '' :` 'r' Flowering shrubs .and.tr.ees were utilized to attract and provide shelter' for wildlife. ; • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources • a, • What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove,:solar) will be ' used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether It. will be used for heating, mariufacLuring, etc. Electic/heating • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally closcribn. No c• What'klnds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this ' .. ' proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or .control energy ,• Impacts, If any: Complies with Washington State Energy Code. ' . . -7, Environmental Health - a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could • occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.' .. No • •;., ;, . 1) : , Describe special emergency services that might be required. , None . • - 2) Proposed measures .to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If , any: ,. None b. Noise 1 , 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for • example: traffic; equipment, operation, other)? • No significant noise impacts. • 'y',' 2) What types and levels of noise wonid be ct eat:ad by or associated with the. •, • project on a short-t.nrrn or a l(,ny-terra basis (for example: traffic,. construction, operation, other)`: Indicate what hours noise would come • • • • from the site. Traffic impacts would occur as a result of traffic to .and,.from the .. .: project. Peak volumes would occur between 7:OOAM - 9:OOAM. and! 4:00PM•- 6:OOPM • rt. , : :: 3) . Proposed measures to reduce or c9ntrol noise impacts, if any: None. proposed. . . ... • 8.. Land and Shoreline Use a. . What.is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • . multifamily • • • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so; describe. • No • cw Describe any structures on the site. • . • .202 multi-family dwellings, recreation building, daycare center F d., Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ' None e. What Is the current zoning classification of the site? . • • R-3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ; :', -eommr re-i:al— C c "?9 (tic__ - g. If applicable, what is the cui rcent. shcr•eline master program designation of the site? . . . • NA h. .___. Has any part of the site been classified as ,an "environmentally sensitive" area? if so, specify. . No I. ._.. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? : . 625 people multi-family , daycare 8 adults; 60 children j: Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NOne k.. . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: : •` ...... . None,, . - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is co,u,.,atible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ' The surrounding uses are residential . This proposal generally , reflects current uses .in the area., 9. Housing a• Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate : whether high, middle. or low-income housing. alternate A: None .. . - - alternate B 4 units b• • Approximately how many units, if any,, would be eliminated? Indicate ' whether high, middle, or low-incomo housing. ---- None , . , . • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ' None • • • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including - antennas; what is the principal exterior.building material(s) proposed. Daycare - 23.' beveled' cedar siding and asphalt composition.. -. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would he altered or obstructed? • None' • • • c, •. Proposed-measures to reduce or control aesthetic imparts, if any: • None 11. Light and Glare "' a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What Lime of day , would It mainlyY occur? Glare wi esurft primarily from exterior glazing and parking lot lighting. , b ; . Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or . .interfere with views? • c. • What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light from traffic at night may impact the proposal : d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,,if any: . . - None,.• . - , ti, • • .,• '• 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the Immediate vicinity? See attached sheet.• b. , Would'the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,. describe. No • • • • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, Including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: to facilities anticipated. No impacts existing i1i ivies is ���cipai;ed. • • • i - 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • a. . Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national; state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If. so,-, generally.describe. . i No . • •b. Generally describe any".landmarks or evidence of historic,.archaeological, " scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. • No • c: Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ' • None • • 14. Transportation • a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed. access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ' • NE 5th and Bremerton Ave NE are within the boundaries of the site. Access to the site will be provided at NE 4thand NE 5th • • b. ' Is site currently served by public transit?. If not, what is the approximately. : distance to the nearest transit stop? • No,. 200 yds.. • c. . How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many • • ,. • would the project eliminate? 364 parking spaced 'are provided within the existing development no. changes are proposed. - • • d: Will the proposal require any new roads .or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe • (indicate whether public or private). 1. •-,-- No • • 9 -- c, a. . Will the pro use (or occur in the Immediate ,, lity of) water, rail; or • ;' ,. ; air transportation? If so, generally describe. - No. ' - f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed • -. project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ' See attached. g. ' Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: . ' Alternate A: The applicant proposes to actively prohibit the use of NE 5th as the primary access to the daycare facility. Alternate B: None • I . Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for • ,• example: fire protection, police protection, health care,'schools, Other)? . • • If so, generally describe. No • I • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, ` ••----. if any. . - . None 16. Utilities a. Cjccle utilit �rently available at the site: , natural gas, �a�a u serv2 failhrrie:0nl Lary set:�r�r se.iC system, other. •-... b. ' Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the,lr,,mediate vicinity which might be needed. • Electricity - Puget Power .• Telephone - US West . Water - Water Distric #90 - Sewer - City of Renton , C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best ul my knowledge the above information is. true and complete. It is understood that the load agency may withdraw any declaration of nit! -- anc 3 that it r 'gh -issue in reliance upon this checklist • • should there • rs m srepresent for or willful lack of full disclosure on • my part: Proponent: ` - _ . .. .• Name Printed: S"-±1. V .I.-, i-t-Z k- ... • ' • • ' _ 10 _ • M , - f 76 11-8-84. Environmental Checklist • - A. BACKGROUND . 10. 3 apartments - 1,213 s.f. each or 4 apartments 909 s.f. each. Note: The applicant is. requesting alternates be reviewed simultaneously. 11. Alternate A: Conditional Use Permit ' The exi-s-ting conditional use permit (No. cu-121-86) states the daycare center shall only serve the needs of the: resi-dents or employees of the existing apartment complex. We want to modify the conditional use permit to allow children from the surrounding community to use this facility. The existing project also consists of 202 multi-family dwellings and recreation center, which encompasses approximately 11.4 acres. Alternate B: Site Plan Approval The existing daycare center. (3,639 s .f. ) would be converted into apartment, dwellings-. •; ' The daycare center will accomodate 4 units. the existing project also consists of 202 multi-family dwellings and recreation center', which encompasses approximately 11.4 acres. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 12: Recreation a. Alternate A: The daycare utilizes an existing fenced area for outdoor play.. exclusively for the daycare. The recreation building and pool are used by the daycare for recreation. i .e. swimming, dance, and exercise. Alternate B: The fenced area now used for the daycare,:would be integrated into the apartment,.complex .as usable open space and play area. • 14.•Transportation f. Alternate A: ' approximately 100 trips. , Peak volumes would be 7:00AM - 9:00AM and 4:00PM--to6:O0PM. ' Alternate B: Approximaterly 25 trips.;.,s'Peak volumes same as alternate A. - PLANNING DIVISION ! CITY OF RENNTON .- JUN 1 6 1989 • ������D . I N - • . - . . : „...:'...,L.,.., . ., ' .. I tc J J1 +11 4 iOW: ... „,,L, , , • ...__.. .. ... . . . . ..,„ '':''':-"-; •-•-• ; i?) . \\/4-10iNel 1+ isfrits-e co wcitag4,4 1 .. • .. . .. ., . , ••-•:,,,LH ' i , • : cu f i 1¢4 6, u t 4►; 1 Cawrc)1110f....s . ...:. ::Jr.rt .t.I.'t"..: ` . USE. 0 F A„-f' h. ti'I P Acl l.1 W 't -S I 1 --L1-5 -` '1 . ArA.. ,, ,�,, 1,r�, • • • . \v'�-1 I��1 It1 /� 'h l .-�' . l-`°�1 u ' .....: pro r tit 111 ti Q .1.11 L7R.,.°I4 Akt 4 u ►-LY. ..la 1,4 R01-14,Vr ° 1 ... , � A r.` G..1L. ,1 -'Y .. .Is - ) .stcor�.1ti.,r7 .1 {: A :: 1rlCy.: Ara , _ $(.X1®'`'� O t .okiz, , I t I.S .I-Jot L,A%r,(..pk,1(.)1,4(co L.1,;, . • Ni I A 5 L1.., 1-6 G.0 t 11 f'4 O I�:, n ,� �Ptile A"Ic' "1-41 I - I.. . ... b10 1....lc *r 1 t 1,..k r ' c 10+ 1.kis . 10 +( k c,t ` .- 1 S Cn Q J 1 101 . i.-3`-f i 1 i °`i\'ft i I.i L Ll lat,0 _ CH I " lw...1`1 • 712 c 4 744:w . 5. ,..A w(;A.,m,4I2 1.I•tif(fir t..,.("d‘ ,•'. ' Y Id li''i.1 1t -'_1 '' ..,. �°" I.e. b^ � 1� CU. fr .. I .- °iti!d' Mv,tf+y�,:::,pi li.4.�:.o-- I;n,�.1 n�I Lp, I,4r'9, ` At IZ I6 Y • • le-1, r.i. 6 • Cou ,..i'i.."Y ` 'F" (1, fro g:,,'^(rr.1)IIE I::f IS:.5 1 -°/1)9 rv4 ,,440 T • -t' •X ':fl •yliii l 1' .d. I.f' 1• 1 1�� j v x • . d � AciA6cf n� I i j.r , - N V G 1 I r t7 M.1t 1, • ,. 07 N IN.0 551.. . S49v. okl..4I 2i v4.t.•: • ' ,. 1cvriQ�.IC+O 7 NI . '0OS ff•N • 1-11 V4 OC(...• • r NI 7'icc;),A t, ()�,. r4. .,; ;�u,., r�a ic. 4^,I�}?J q'e I • '' ., ,.. . .•,:. 'I, 5„Ai. `4iFIS„�I1%40cI1Cir0,1 .. 1CA �.NCi 0714INato', 1 . Ir • t ,..ca L'31. ."l", F'l?A r-i r-, � ..) .� ,-..i +0 �. 2)1, ,fi 5 .P;tiq.0 1 V q 1 . '9r . :1 vivl,, .cil !1' t�1C7 t'I r''I•A .. . ,Y A 5 1 I"t,j. rat G ri-f- A/411 I r4 ")',t Ier`-I I e70 0 .... ..VCct av I rf.., 1. "-epoSciNIC1 grti. • CI NIrk N 1 • •• XI5 _.._.... ' Ai a'Ac41 I rl 0 • 0 eM49 PI(1 N • . �`l j• -LI 1►I `1 ri 'P 11-i f�\ . �4' sai?J,(':)/kotea. w 0r‘ N41 ... ler-1C'"kei t rt qq , t: ... ... ;. - • 5 H' Ntc lied •INJW40. -")Id , .. c'A1-►. ; .• • ao, • . �at7 $ • V___..._ II • .10N r) c� 41 ' -O i Z1 -1J 07 . . . °1N I • : Art4, iriot'T '1i-E , c A1AN I 464c', ,,GG t1Qei . ., i .. '; ;• i: ; �.,i • • • . ;�,�s, ' 6*I0I,O A . N Ala) NC t4- i44� ,. , ,F? - c77)\ Cf ` i NI Nerptal I r i-, r 110?;II N% sSart, • ai B1 r14. a.lc ' $G ctI+'J`A l Ad „„„ 7. of 5)? r141 n\ A4ICI 14 V c*IN.O Q I G n "17 N /.t`ICF^4, I` 4 > 1dV 07 .4,1sE1W:Oridi nA ( , •• 1.141r\ Al.1140ok ,,1c ) 51 •4-64 00").„9 G}. . Sij N(1. 0)N111AA\c$ "tare O i1-100 Q S I.ra (7, NI A\) 1V Gi 11on\' ONNoz '711 t .... H y V'O 5c/Q1.4., ^c'(cri r).)1(..rl: ON 41,4 31 A. l o C1,- . c, Ck:7 0"":;a 09 N I' 'I Inc-1 N BIN-t-vcr 7R -4JN( tb sal A. r..I 05 i ;7;1? Ate.,4 ` c ,ad°act r i fit'! I ,, "1. ,NA I t r-! I 5 sv r1.O 11' c 1ricAN, ,I ,, .t� .._. .t A ., N ?J afn ... NO . oisi4mt2171 Si N 0 0,,ir;;7 0 "404 , --- • SIR_N . THWESTERN • . • WASHINGTON LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION -. • PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FORM • A Minnesota Title Company 250 Arctic Building • • 70^Thinl Avenue Seattle.Washington 9810e-1049 (206)625.1952 PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLI: INSURANCE • To : Coldweli Banker 110 - 110th Ave . N. F. . , Suite 303 Bellevue , WA Attn: John Hashim Your Reference : Windsor Place Associates/B . R. E . Properties , Inc . Our Order No. : NT028577 • Effective Date:. November 4 , 1988 at 8 : 30 a.m. • Policy or Policies to be issued: • ALTA Owner' s Form B-1970 Policy X Amount: $10 , 75.0 , 000 . 00 Standard X Extended Premium: $ 4 , 084 . 00. Tax: $ 330 . 80 Rate : Builders • Proposed . Insured: B.R.E. Properties , Inc . TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA agrees to issue On request and on recording of any appropriate documents , its policy or policies as . applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this preliminary- commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in WINDSOR PLACE ASSOCIATES., a Washington Limited Partnership subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms , • conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a • basis for the coverage specified herein. • Bob Engelhorn, Title, Officer • Linda Ames , Title Officer Phone : 625 -0313 and 625-1952 SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" for LEGAL DESCRIPTION . • ( CONTINUED ) PLANNDMSION CITY OF RENTON • JUN 1 61989 RECEIVED • • ,IORTHWESTERN - ITLE A • • • '" rik, A Minnesota Title Company • EXHIBIT "A". PARCEL A: The North half of the West half of the East half of . the Southwest--' - 'quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M. , in King County, Washington , . EXCEPT the North 268 . 60 feet thereof; . PARCEL B: The North 200 . 12 feet of the East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter • of. the Southwest quarter of Section 10 , Township 23 ' North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; • - EXCEPT the West 130 . 00 feet thereof; -PARCEL C: • The Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter • of the Southwest - ' • quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10 , Township 23 North, Range S . East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT. the North 200 . 12 feet ; and - EXCEPT the West. 130. 00 feet; • • • PARCEL D: The South three-quarters-of the East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County , Washington; • EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to Kin.g .,Coun,ty for Southeast -128th. Street by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 5738287 and 5738289. • EXCEPT those portions of the above described Parcels A, B, C, & D, conveyed to the City of Renton for street purposes by deed recorded under Recording No. 88062704.12 . • END OF EXHIBIT "A" • f • • • • • • NT028577/564• • - Page 4 I , • ...i ' , . • "WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC :ANALY'SIS1s , N . J; . J • , • Prepared for . -' , ; T}i�I ,�i�K 9 c greet j; ' • Seattle , Washington 98148 f December, 7.9.86 J:I 4• . •i - 'i77+ is it a �,ii. r. �i4df+lzy[{`1iiiiN li i. - . •I `Transportation 1 7 e r r (. PIa,n.n i a in� ,ne ,1. + ' Inc. • ..,.. ,•,, : • . . r. a �/,� I'il�, �h' I`� ' h::y � i7i + I(".�i+ 1i�7 t� 'lfi . ,',. . . h ' Ii { I I + j 1 ++ 'I E th ',r 7 I.' _r 11 1- .ii f, 1I11.,1.t.0 1'Wile�;1 ''%I'iill F,31l F. I1.I� j t I II:, ,II, • �'I S' 7 is • it.: I 2101 12tn Avenue N,E:, ,Suite 110' ,; p Bellevue, Washington 98004 • (206) 455-5320 • - MN�: • • PLANNI CRY OF RENT, ON JUN 1' 61989 1. • •• , RECEIVED• 1--.1' is . . , ' , - , , • • • • • • • • 1 . WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS . . • - - • •• • • Prepared for , . • . PRIMARK 102-1200 S. 192nd Street . • Seattle, Washington 98148 ' • Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. nm 2101 , - 112th Ave. N.E. , Suite 110 • --1 Bellevue, Washington 98004 • . . December, 1986 • • . . • 111 . 1111 • . . • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 1 121h AVENUE N.E.SUITE 1 10- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P E. TELEPHONE 455-5320-AREA CODE 206 President December 23 , 1986 Mr. William Van Geelkerken Construction Manager PRIMARK 102-1200 S. 192nd Street Seattle, WA 98148 • Re: Traffic Impact Analysis Windsor Place, City of Renton Dear Mr. Geelkerken: We are pleased to submit the enclosed traffic assessment for the Windsor Place development. Our findings indicate that the development of Windsor Place would not cause a significant change in the overall traffic operating conditions in the vicinity of the project. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. David H. Enger, P.E. , Vice President JM/mb . Enclosure ' • 1 • TABLE. OF CONTENTS • DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL EXISTING CONDITIONS I_ TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT m , - CONCLUSIONS LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 EXISTING 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 3 ESTIMATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES • GENERATED BY WINDSOR PLACE I , FIGURE 4 ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES INCLUDING WINDSOR PLACE APPENDIX TP&E Staff Contributors to this Study: Victor H. Bishop, P. E. , President David H. Enger, P.E. , Vice President Jacques Meijsen, Transportation Planner w DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The proposed project (Windsor Place) is a low-rise apartment complex to be located on approximately 11 . 4 acres in Renton.' Or " the south side the property borders on N. E. 4th Street and on the east side on newly proposed 136th Avenue Southeast. The proposed development also includes another new local access street, N. E. 5th Street, which will cross the northern portion of the property connecting Union Avenue N.E. with proposed 136th 'Avenue Southeast. Access to Windsor Place from the south will be via N. E. 4th- Street and 136th Avenue S. E. and access from the east via Union Avenue and N. E. 5th Street. Figure 1 shows the. location of the site. The final project will be made up of 40 individual buildings containing a total of 208 apartment units. Approximately 369 parking spaces will be provided in the development. Construction of the project is expected to be completed in 1987 . EXISTING 'CONDITIONS • The street system serving the site consists of N.E. 4th Street, a four lane major east-west arterial and Union Avenue N.E. a two lane north-south arterial. The posted speed limit is currently 35 MPH on N. E. 4th Street and 30 MPH on Union Avenue Northeast. The proposed N. E. 5th Street and 136th Avenue S.E. will be two lane local access streets. The intersection of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. is controlled with a multi-phase, fully actuated traffic signal. At • I ' 1 the intersection N.E. 4th Street has a left-turn only lane in .ad- _ dition to the two through lanes in both: the east and westbound di- rections. Currently, "the traffic signal .is operating . at an • average 105 second cycle length during the PM peak hour. . The cy- cle length varies depending on the magnitude of left turn • demand at the intersection. _ Manual turning volume traffic counts for this' intersection - were available for the PM peak hour period of Tuesday, June 10, 1986 and are shown in Figure 2. A capacity analysis 'was 'per-• formed using the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity . Manual - Special Report 209 , method for signalized int.ersec- • I - tions. The calculated level of service' for the Union Avenue • — N.E./N.E. 4th • Street intersection is LOS C with an average vehi- cle delay at the intersection of 23 . 2 seconds during the PM peak hour. Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative term that de- scribes the operating conditions thata driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway. It is spec- - , ified on six different levels ranging: from A (little or no delay) ' to F (extreme congestion) with D considered being acceptable dur- ing the peak hour. • Five Metro Transit routes currently run in the vidinity of _ the project site.. Routes, .1.07, 108 and 114 run along Union Avenue 1 N.E. , _while routes 110 and 111 run along N. E. 4th• Street connect-. ing the area 'with the Newport Hills park-and-ride lot, 'downtown . Renton and downtown Seattle • TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION . • When completed, the proposed residential development, is ex- pected to ' generate approximately 1373 vehicle trips per average weekday at full occupancy with 125 of these vehicle trips occur- • 2 - i ' L- I__ ring during the AM peak hour and 146 during the PM peak hour. Of ' - the 125 AM peak hour vehicle trips, 100 are expected to exit. and 25 to enter the project while of the 146 PM peak hour vehicle . trips 97 are expected to enter and 48 to exit. A vehicle trip is . defined as "A single or one-directional vehicle movement with ei- ' they the origin or destination (exiting or 'entering) inside the. - study site". . The above trip generation projections are based on • data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in . - Trip Generation . - An Informational Re ort, Third Edition, 1982. The expected average daily and PM peak hour vehicle distribu- tion . of the proposed development site generated ' traffic over the street network is shown in Figure 3. II FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT • • Figure 4 shows the 1986 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the • adjacent street network plus the volumes generated by Windsor • Place.- A capacity analysis. was again performed for the• signalized intersection of . N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. Including the volumes from Windsor Place the calculated level of service , for the intersection is expected to be LOS D with an average vehi- - cle delay of 25. 2 seconds. The project is not expected to con- • tribute more than 4 percent additional traffic to the . intersection during the PM peak hour period. • An analysis was also performed fo•r the two .unsignalized in- tersections of 136th Avenue S.E.. and N. E. 4th Street; and Union Avenue and N. E. 5th Street using the Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, method for unsignalized intersections. ;• South of N.E. 4th St: , 136th Ave. S. E. appears to carry so little • • traffic that the future improved intersection was treated as a "T" intersection in this analysis. • The intersection of Union Avenue N.E. and N. E. 5th Street is • expected to operate at LOS A for. the left turns from Union Avenue into the project and LOS B for the combined left and right turns from N.E. 5th Street leaving the project during the PM peak hour. • • _. The intersection of N. E. 4th Street and 136th Avenue S. E. is expected to operate at LOS A for the left turns from N. E. 4th Street into Windsor Place and LOS B , for the combined left and right turns from 136th Avenue S. E. leaving the project during the PM peak hour. Left turn movements from 136th Avenue S. E. are ex- pected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. It should be , noted ; that only 2 vehicles are projected to make this maneuver during the 'PM peak hour. King County is currently designing a project to widen S.E. 128th St. (extension of N.E. 4th St. ) to five lanes from just west of 138th Ave. S.E. to 144th Ave. Southeast. The project • will also include new street lighting and rebuilding of the traf- fic signals at 138th and 144th Avenues, allowing for future sig nal coordination along this route. CONCLUSIONS The proposed residential development of Windsor Place is not expected to cause a significant change in the overall traffic op- !' erating conditions around the project. Although the level of ser- vice at the intersection of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street ' is expected to fall from C , to D during the . peak hour this only - represents an actual increase in the average vehicle' delay at' the intersection of two seconds. 4 1,. ;rnnr w q ! -.F :, y r I1. 1' $ t! E 7S� is 11l1y t 'c ! li 1 A, 'J H T 11iZC N' ,•.;,Z a •�.'a1�Ar�ta,�..t re�'n �'•l.�!t ;!`d :,•tYs.f tRT»IM. kmI JS 1!i,�,7N :X�>•a a `t ►dE.rn 1,. S, t„1 1+ y, r •f +. Per - pn. J. Atli :d: Y 1 Y S :t 4 ''1. ,`,A lY 1" t SE I0 1'1[)..l S: I J .Atli .t • l is Y 4. 'Nit ZIldl ST vs -` i•Sr 1 \•� . tl' l'� 1d,SE�+�7Rr T T aK wt�c�� a I N L • ?r ° W• e gp d Y� '` °.111'r I"'SE i�i i N Y 7T':� F. — z « a is . !>LL i,t�r .. SE 1OFTN `,• _1 ,:, ,'�' 4' •x • $e'Karla u.rt NV ';E',Od?;l $J 'Pt'I w;Y, NE 19TN 5T a 7,, a y ~ rZ U x a x HE 123N. '' ✓iQ „ E� h:: ► N r� , '-f Wr I '`�' p w .r r. 5i w ri.L„1...... ' __ , ► p.. }s td p , � • n L Wa �: 7,' , z«.'ter !SY cs f . g u1 I : >r ill ,r•oaS'.?'' uI ai:‘.Tj� • �'�\ ;. \,•- �,,A/�.dT,j �.T ,.� I - -- .. ,-zj._Y,.a...I,...}• ....... _ a!.�. 1firs-: / a NF. �iT1M P CT I. > .-) a •• N� lb?!i '�T �'1 I"�Sa"U` 1.................Ltj X..1,e F.43TfH L. — ''E'1E'�t=K�"'C r;' ;:,--r'-E;Y r/•- $ ,.h i:y -r-f '.. r i....*L ' c``u •a. 1 — NE' i T_ A .5�i Ch n�-,.Y 2I rr. 4 •• h ! �Ft^t61N$T �� N 1lTH w w <.• F,' :;.:,, ...I.• XI •••'I' p f >..- , d A-1Z w I �Vi .. T 11. w 'al, f °rev ki, ' R:'l \'6X , A ,� 'tL JA HS u:ld w w f•1 14 Sr :•` .. a 1 'en } ¶ 'IF IIiH C _ ST •'& 4' �J• • '�, •� .. F •'�•"'..,r-----4- vs• ' A, , Fir •..-_2 .h�..s • 72'fH_ '�T -�•�•-�-• m ,r�T Y ftlX ,VC pq �t I c{Y,;.,s t '\ v` •�:•.,,.Qt,.,�:; rFLdIT 6L" I u f 1 I ❑F � ,.t I r f `'�. �' ++ S•' .i•. .> �Z'. '^C Zp Izear'-A iT!4 i"''') AK !-•` ,��, .<.'r ,Jr; ,z tdF; t1rt. L� a z ( ? ST' E 1 1 _ p UA a.'` , �' `•>° HE 'aE I., �}� a 1.wN! et.,iCR h! s 1 r ;r >r t:•'!t�' E \K NE t1TSI T .<8� t ::t� �1.1ill24,-Lj • I HAY.EY ( t. v' i�l a. + NE OYl1 !L u r ,;a�'3 6 sr�' �e r SE..!IITN . u:��;.`NE'.CEN, " - >I a 'w' t "� ii:r.• a>I Y z••si` �' _1.. ;c `lr �. ct w kG�10�H ! a �E ICTF_Tt Y,, t °' •r, 1. p�/ r1 l </,`S` r:fHrr. I .� � �� .: t �..c/ :! A l • w ,td!: 1OTN�ST "'mil• is C t wE _k. IU7F1 N� ,`t K� E 1 i 1 v~, 1 a �t a - z .. `?,'-�-- r� 'f a a �'i' =t TE. •1t>rTN_�....1; x 's: t NE 9rN 1'E:'••`V 7 , 4..z.. ,. k... �7TA, i- � r• • I, k 1 ,y. .c. "J _ ...- .,,q {,_ .. o1N.... _.St. '4T .. _ .P�'i Pi -. _.. _. _ .. Y ~ .' v ae °�'r r Rf 4_ T ...~ .. 3E'. .. IAr, ': E �91s1 5���• a l T!a y •c x• T . rrhNt a---rv' f 1ErfN ?r •`:� Ni:9Ta93I cc u w• P1;,4,c S� y .."..-.... p: 4.Sr Z l ':i .' ^ :a ar ( .ti. !N��;;;:$Y— 4 ..,. .n. '�'.�ngaK R: 4 I �! F . C lE1 r3; <tiE�rN E aa: ,Jr FS r%i°u:!P�.I f��.>. Er, `E • .:.. ,... •r;,{f• v,� cT ., N `32 '^:�a'cliw. ...++ J� y.:•. _fia 4 — \,.....i.:Z"'40 E"-�)F r a .Y t r-u z d a lsFElLrlE CT i. .E i is l ai E k �' ^1'IE. x -- . S I L OCAT I ON E. "oT!1 s? ,�rl Ti ` y{Noi c' NE, �1n"�< .tdF. 6u"Z f hr TL L u7''t 1 •21S` ST AN i _. 'r • I. f N_�•� k4. ;..KE• KI�"1l' r�' '�' NF• Tl!t•��-�� F.�IJ roY:.'I ,. ... cc�� Ia;s7•' ST 1 4 1 ._ ,E ^ ,'.�',`'�=4 c'�„t +j't 3 iV E: 6'f_i1...LPL a] d7 ci1. O� t rJ L, +ti YF�Y. ,`. NC if:4 u. a rt^N • sT F� I ST 'j��" / i ! if' t 7 /ity 01,., NE' rN J:t l!; '""'f' , i.e., ',�N.FIA I C. I ••� V c • r ' ' t' S ! $THS o7;t •7� i ;'w'{Il�,,:ri rr i +z j+C '4f�T R •-r .3` '/ SE ..aa. .... -5C.9 .. "••>'^'-'t .S %. ! i w I.e. rF1 iT t,_s�T !_ _r a' t NE 7-t fA N :`aiz; ,•'c"' \ 1 fa:: Am c- �I 6FF _.. _.. _... wl. lyNR:()Pt ?< fr I ;>:t......, • ESE 12&TH _ % is I ar / adreasoR t:t•,1s C , _ ;;c�T ! PARK' ^ f GRFFh'riG7D I EaN X)/4. l t ..kINZRO ue! SE I 12STiiJ$T ' n � wlrt I .. i.' is ty AL 6E I131 Tp}y,..$?_ I MI f4 6 1 r. ya `�idl:`"". `c3" w • r E_ i II 132N (f gy:{r!1 lla / `I. T �' " �l �::r �' ••C et Ini .l'. ;E ttp.r<>t•. H. ..Fp�• , ••• R: �)� I 1. Pi. $ kiP.T•N FSI N i S3 T Q gkk <. t7 'z \,:;..,star cc rver n. S{f /ff NE 5T7i ': rl o J� : t., ...ERY `��'iE 4Tk 6T j h.•', •y y )t I • .rT�+ V.1"' %Tli ST _! r SE /r. CC!)ARfa,VEN 162! I .. ' aPl i}fy/ ( J R 'S?H I 1 11,_ 1s{n h,s 0 S1dxt iPi1A .. : x crf bvs9 1,.,: J� J y �•.�,� �� ` ! ,✓• b.9il ,_..YFh.r:�.'`1,, •'.s '. - _•.{' 3E ..h^ si-,e '�vst.E 1^,7HS? u • `'. • +..`.•F....!,`.f".-+......—i.•Y.+y�.,y.. .. I.'..kl.4 %. ,'.••'. ••': :• ,. •,p,'11-1L.SLi.._...` ,` rW ' t•�� t c ,' 'c'; �y i ,J4Sh.F'i..f'IM1VCJU•t.'. St;. ''r;, II: .• -� �TI1�`.T♦ I '�.�' B 1/ti. ;�. ,.., ;# -' t'. / c:h a! Y.I, Al'n >t l< < Y: .�:yAANUED r>:r�r,',ft•` pl..,,,. • �7� .•� :) �'�OU.RSf.' :;t... .....},.«•.•£..•.^+'-v ;} (' ,�``a,.1Y1.{{py$, lN5T -_ ��.r.i.:' ,?AN.K/r• .a Y-'. f .Pr N` .?"....`.!,..1'• .•..t. •'.'„AA:. "'r•'`\,x.' En all / VICINITY MAP FIGURE WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 ssiguAssa `� nt� lintwiNI �Sil.'§N 1 9i1 �ht �Yta dZiriiat�n�'niwa 111 N ROAD - 25,5P�v' j v,-zo�'� , Z N• U.1 rill > • cr3 Q ; ,` w11 p r�I not to scale cp \- r : a.) 0 V) i NE s 1;h ST i i cpinm O aod- , NE 4 th ST =—lio 4 � 90 SE 128th ST -j (2.3 8 00) j 270 (20800) . T5-� (.. 6 W w Z (xxx) ADT 0 XXX PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Z M EXISTING 1986. TRAFFIC VOLUMES i„ FIGURE WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS -Tr . 2 J _ ��••m• ., ,ustilrom uffor 9tionnfliiiltilEliilli!} IFkiiiiiii.' •t grl� n � :w-.w,. - • :sir;,. ,--_ iSri,• • '_hiYl. . • 4! • �N ROAD .,rt 5�/1(,,� +f.j • • 11�� • • 0 °ba 5� • . N : , w • w' ,, — ¢ • ¢ w11 • AJL Z Q not to scale ►1 . Z L • -.0 fr) ,-+ • • • .i:'-----, - ' Lii. r.2.0 •, _ ... . • rell' . • iST SIC nth . • N r • • NE 4th ST ) - _ d- N 96I). , SE ST _ Imo} A. .3- 12 th 039) 2.9 ---) • • • .... . • • Z a (XXX) ADT •o z XXX PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC • . ESTIMATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES • GENERATED BY WINDSOR PLACE FIGURE . . WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC AN ALYSIS 3 • • . . _ vt ROAD • . . ON . . . ,-Os(N . • - -- • ' . . . . ". A.0!/11 • • .LU . N z , . w .•> . . > not to scale Z .•0 I — • I-4 . Z . z .4-) • -.0 . . ti ,--i. _ „ I . ...... . . . . . , A I NE - 5th ST 1 — t r 1 . . . . . 74 N • T • • • . • 1 - . k..... , 96 , . . . NE 4th 'ST.4) 1L. -4--(.... 9-",j -:.r_ N IL._ s -. I SE 128th ST . z99 --) -41 tr 39 ........) 970--OP' 1 145 --if" . . • :111'-•9 , . . • I - W ._ . . U) • • W , q . Z • ' • , r .. 0 I-1 - ) ' Z ' .. . ' i M . . . . 1 - '';...- . ' ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES . INCLUDING WINDSOR PLACE It' 17 . (FIGURE) 4. • _WINDSOR PLACE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 7 \ . I .. 1 c9 9 ai 1-1GII'l r. 9 "3 NI i'21 IL__ I Z. E ID I IN,1 T E___:" . .9 E..:G ir I ip Ni s 1 -NE-NE-34--34--34--34--X-44--X--34--X--X--X--X-14--31--14--34--34--if--X--31--34--34--34--X--34--34-14-14--34-44--34- P.- a E.IFe:Ot I__ I-I I 13'.I-IIXI Pt"Y' Pt 1:-)1•1 I NI I 9-11-Ft:IA-T I C)FA . . I NTERSECT ION: NE 4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE ANALYST: •„TM —IME OF ANALYSIS: PM 1-10 I-1 VZ ATE OF ANALYSIS : 1 cA BG, ( e_)c‘s-rrt4 G. ---r%Wv‘c Vo Lu imEs) AREA TYPE: m I SC. INFO: • 1 A ) G Pii IF"Pa G I -1-'Y' PI N-I ID I__EL-V'IE I__ ID F- 9 E IR:V' I G E ' BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH — *****************************A****A*W*4 *AM-**** *44-************* ******** X V/S STOPPED STUFFED LANE CRIT. V/C FLOW DELAY DELAY I_— GROUP MVMT. RATIO RATIO CAP. (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS --- EB L ____ . 59 . 2 507 .". 4 C • EB TR * . 82 . 41 1.558 . 14. 3 ' B EB lb C WB L NB LT NB R * * . 82 . . 02 . 34 . ()7 . 13 . 05 l ',? 2',5" 214 57 37. 2 WB TR 82 764 24 9 C WB 2'1 . 3 E I) C NB 33. 9 NB 29:3 • D 33. 9 1 SB. L . 6 . 11 270 31 D SB TR * . 82 . 15 261 36 D • BEI 33. 8 D 9 Li li'l 1 — I NI''T E.FC.9 E G-11- I 0 NI : X im ( "....) / 9 ) i= ID E IL_Pk*Y" I__CI 9 --- - - 9...--2 - -7 43, 2 .77; . .7.-1, C , . in ) I Ni F•urr c,,,a L.u Pi s i — MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LEFT 270 901 111 149 j — THRU 931 440 76 85" ' . RIGHT 165 96 65 108 R-O-R 0 0 0 0 = RIGHT-ON-RED - , VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECT ION F. 1 1 — . . . 1 1 B I iL_.1,1 A :s_ ,_ NJ(A L._ 12: EE I:► :1: NI I M'.E 1 :B IEE Ir.: r I D NI.,'r- 4E-3E--34--3E--9*-4E--31E--3*--NE--X--9*--X--3 4-#-31E-PE--34-h*E-X- E--34--3,E--31E-Mt--3*E--31--3+E•-1 E-34E••-3-4E-4*--NE- ) GEDC31V1E'rI RY . EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 L 1.2 L 12 LT 12 LT 12 2 T 11 T 11 R 11 TR 11 3 TR . 12 TR 12 "Di ) T AF-1= I 1G AKJl3 POD IA/PiD1*ID I -r I NI 8 1 APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ********* ** •****** ********** ********** GRADE (%) : • 0 00. :C) PERCENT HV: 7 22 2 PARKING MANEUVERS (#/HR) : i) i) i) 0 • BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 9 . . 9 . 9 . 9 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 0 i) C) 0 MIN. GREEN TIME i FOR PED. CROSSING: 15. 5 15. 5 21 . 5 21 . 5 ARRIVAL TYPE: 4 4 3 ._, E ) B I G1VAIL_ T I NI I NI C3 Eno NIID F'I-1AB I NJC INTERVAL -- EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ************ ************* ******•******* ****•****• **** ************* NO. DURATION L T R P RA L 1 R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA 7 0 X X X i) X X X X 4 ci X X X F 5. i) X X X CYCLE LENGTH: 100 SECS. SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2 SECS. RA = RIRHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8 SECS. P = f?E1:)ESTRIAN PHASE 1 1 c-1 B 3 'H L. B _;F .1 '-i F_ I ' E ID I No-r-E-_ E C IF r_ cI r I B Z5 -a•e--art-- -- --M--3t-art- ---.. --)--�(--a.F-*-- -xe- - - --14--4--4- ---3 . --3k=-�- c- -3-- -- - . COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP' **********************•********•*•********•* EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN ' GROUP MVMT. TIME (SEC) G/C ED L -L . - . 3 EB TR * 0. 08 . 5 WN L * 8 . 0 WE TR 4. 79 . 2 NB LT * 6. 22 . 1 NB R 6.22 . 1 - SB L 8. 24 . 1 _ SB TR " * 8. 24 . 1 F ) i OF{F:Ei:T I DNI FC1C DDF-' s . SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL *******.****..*. ..*.***.*.* ADJ. LANE' SAT. # OF f f f f •f f f f SAT: GROUP FLOW LANES W HV B P D+.E+ A RT ' LT• FLOW EH L 18�ii t 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 . 95 1524 ED TR 1800 2 . 99 . 99 1 1 1 . . 9 . 98 1 3112 11-1-1 WB L 1800 1 1 . 99 1 ]. 1 . 9 1 . 95 1524 WB TR 1$i 1U 2 . 99 . 99 1 1 1 : 99 . 97 1 3080 NE{ LT 1800 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 . 97 1556 - - NB R 1800 1 . 97 . 99 1 ' 1 1 ' . 9 . 85 1 1322 SB L WOO 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 . 95 1524 SB TR 1800 1 . 97 . 99 ]. 1 1 ..9 . 92 1 1431 DEMAND VOLUME. ************* GROUP LANE ADJ. _ - "" APF'R. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE o- EB L 270 . 9 300 L 300 1 1 1 300 EEC T 931 . 9 1034 TR 1217 2 1 .05 1 1278 EB R 165 . 9 183 - r . • WB L 90 . 9 100 L 1 00 1 1 ' 1 ' 100 WB T 440 .9 489 TR 596 2 1 . 05 1 626 W8 R 96 . 9 107 NB L 111 .9 123 IINB T 76 ' . 9 84 LT 207 ' 1 1 1 . 207 NB' R '65 . 9 72• R 72 1 1 1 72 11 SB L 149' . 9 166 L 166 1 1 1 166 SB T 85 . 9 ' 94 TR 214 1 1 1 214 SB R ' 10B w 9 120 1_ r . . . 1 5?El 51 1--I G.'Irl :: 9'.,..: :is PA prAl L._ I -.2: E 1) I INA-r E-_-.F.1:9 E 1E1 C3 IN4 1 i -31-INE--X--31-let-lit--3.E•-X-1TE-41E--If--31-4f--NE-4E--31--31--14--PE-- E--31.--3*-.11---X-41E--Ift--3*3E--NE--34-,-34--311E--3IC- - E.--.F.1:111__. 1-11 I ID 1-11All Pt Nir (-21 ID Irl 3: N.13: 8,-11-F.:A ir I. DIN . i -i NTERSECTTON: NE 4TH STREET' AND UNION AVENUE i ANAL YST: • JM 'IME OF ANALYSIS: PM peAK i-lou R. ----..)ATE OF ANALYSIS : 1 9 8 (E I 5-111.4 g% TPFC V 0 LA-1 rn ti. g T'S P 1-1-1 .!3 E'i:VT\NI et V.V)1 AREA TYPE: c":7 E N E.R"-re r) BY V./11,11) SoNP, PLp‘Ge IISC. INFO: --"A ) IC Ink 1=•irf4 IC I -11-N' r ,1 1E3 L._IE c.."EL.. (.:3 F•7 13 NE FZ:V' 3C IC E.: I - . • BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH . . *******************************.***************** ************************ ' I - X V/S STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. V/C FLOW • , DELAY • • DELAY GROUP MVMT. . RATIO RATIO CAP. (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS --- , I 7 EB L -• .66 EB TR ' * . 86 ... 22 501 24. 2 C ' . 43 1540 16 C EB 17.7 C I - . . * . 86 . 07 116 N. A. F WB. TR . 86 . 21 747 27 D WB. . 32 P . . . _ NB LT . * • ' . 85 . 13 241. 41 . 4 E NB 37. 1 D - • NB R • . 35 . 05 • 205 24. 8 C NB 37. 1 1 7 . SB L . 56 . 11 295 29. 6 D SB TR * . ..86 . 17 274 38. 8 D SB 35 D • • OTE: DELAY MEANINGLESS WHEN X > 1 . 2 • . • BUN • • - - I h1/4111-EF:BIEICT" I C3INI ..: X ( "...".... ) c . IDEEL_IPW ' L_CJEB ..- - 4E36) . 7c? ----:%1= ...:._.• --.•ask -•-.... 13 if ) I NI IF"ILFT V C3 L...LI N1EB .. • MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ...- • LEFT 299 90 111 149 -- THRU -- 970 454 • 76 -85 RIGHT 165 '96 ' 65 128 • 0 . 0 0 0 ... R-O-R = RIGHT-ON-RED . . . ,-...i VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. • . __. . . . . _ 11 1 ''eta F-1 C;NI'L B. 3 IN1 0 IL_ I :Z E E ID I I-4-F L 8 EE C T I C3 NI S ` -NE--art--3rt-ICE--3*E--3#--3*3e*-4 -3*E--34--3*-4*4 -9*---30E3-- *-11--3�E-IRE 34--3�E-Irt--NE--3 4E-I -rt- r---F--PE--X--3+E-*—-X- 10 ) S 1=D IN1 I=1—F1'Y' i:. • EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND -- LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH • MOV • WIDTH 1. 1.1 1 L 12 L 12 LT 12 LT 12 -_ 2 T 11 T 11 P 11 • TR 11 3 TR 12 TR 12 1 D ) -r FR:Pt F=IF I C ANID F:CI rci 1D IAPPlY GDNIIID I T I DNIS , IAPPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND a�**** x * *** * * *� * **-****-***-* GRADE (X) : 0 0 i 0 0 o PERCENT' HV: 2 2 • 2 2 F'ARK I NG '• • MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 0 0 • 0 0 BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 C) . 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 9 . 9 . 9 9 U . CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 0 G 0 • ..._.. . • 0 _. • 3', MIN. GREEN TIME FOR FED. CROSSING: 15. 5 15. 5 21 5 21 . 5 ARRIVAL TYPE: 4 4 _ ._, . 'E ) S I U NI Pt L. T 1 NI I NI S pi NI D F='F--1(LI S I E',.I 1.-n INTERVAL EASTBOUND WEST BUIJND NORTHBOUND 50UTHBOUND ************ ************* *****.*.*. .*.. ..*** ************* ************* • NO. DURATION L. T R F' RA L T R F' RA L I R F' RA L T R P- RA 17 2. _ X X X • _ 0 •X X • • X X 4 0X X X _r 5 0 • ... _ X X X r I rCYCLE LENGTH: 100 SECS. SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED LOST TIME PER PHASE: 2 SECS. RA = RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 8 SECS. P = PEDESTRIAN PHASE . • 1..' C F F--I C V-'1 87 NI tom`+L 3_ 7.• ! I.3 1 N11 1-EE I 3 E-:ACC:: T :lI D NJ B - -art-• rt--art- 14 -)E-34-- • 1E--31-14--3, n -3NE--NE- ••+E-• C--IC_3.-*E-)d--M- ; -m-- c-3t..b:-- -31--art-. - - COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP II )4•***************if**********k*k****W*)t-Y EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN IIGROUP MVMT. TIME (SEC) G/C EB L . 2. 86 . L EB TR * 9. 47 . 4 WB L * 7. 63 , 0 WB TR 4.24 . 2 ' NB LT * 5. 47 . 1 NB R 5. 47 . 1 SB L 9. 38 . 1 SB TR * 9. 38 . 1 /1- } CCM Ft:F�*EiCT I ciiNi FolCTCIF;:B SATURATION FLOW RATE t IDEAL ******************** ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. GROUP • FLOW. LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW EB L 18!i0 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 .95 1524 EB TR 1800 2 . 99 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 .98 1 3112 WB L 1800 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 . 95 1524 WB TR 1800 2 . 99 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 . 97 1 3080 NB LT 1800 1 1 . 99 1 1 1 .9 1 . 97 1556 NB R 1800 1 . 97 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 . 85 1 1322 SB L 1800 1.. 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 1 . 95 1524 SB TR 1800 1 . 97 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 . .91 1 . 1416 DEMAND VOLUME ************* GROUP LANE ADJ'. 1 AF'PR. MVT. FLOW LANE - FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. F'HF RATE GROUP RATE LANES . FACTOR FACTOR RATE • EB L 299 . 9 332 L :,-..2 1 . 1 1 332 EB T 970 . 9 1078 TR 1261 2 1 . 05 i5 1 1324 EB R 165 . 9 183 WN L 90 . 9 100 L . 100 1 1 1 100 WB T 454 . 9 504 TR 611 2 1 . 05 1 642 WB R 96 . 9 107 NB L 111 . 9 123 - • NB '1• 76 . 9 84 LT 207 •1 1 ' 1 207 NB R 65 .9 72 R ' 72 1 1 1 72 , SB L 149 .•9 166 L 166 1. 1 1 166 SB T 85 . 9 94 TR 236 1 1 1 236 SB R 128 . 9 142 r UNSIGNALIZEO IN'rERSEcI IONS 10-37 WORKSHEET-FOR ANALYSIS OF T INTERSECTIONS • LOCATION: Y4Vi': L 1., '7' T1M ! P1^'1 7E-A\< !-1oLAZ - HOURLY VOLUMES • VOLUMES IN I'CPII r x\,.>S l I(l -Trt, F',," c -\ }• .s�Ir‘A\\_ Ca Major Street: L_t��\ '•,., i l ----70 N '1\'+4\' -.\` c: ''.'c. C,. - '.. <?,.? ' '''''SoQ Y•..,\4 N= _ V b`tZ Grade . — Vz `I`�Z V,zyZ — V24 f? V� ��— C2-% — V3 3___9______)., rr----.._ N =0 ___ VI Z_ _____7_17 cz.-- , V7 V V V 9 7 9 Date of Counts:________ 201 1/2 0 STOP 2'2.I Time Period: ` -- ❑ YIELD _ 13 Average Running Speed: N=U Minor Street: PIiF: —Grade D % . ills S tti. S 1'r- VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS _ Movement No. 2 3 " — 1 5 2-1 9 • Volume(vph) LH 2 . 2: `j 2 ':( 3`-f7 "pc, 12 Vol. (pcph),see Table 10-1 _--_-----=_ _ -= -- ,1 STEP 1:RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flow, V, 1/2 V3 4-V2 --_ \`' +`{s.{Z =95 7 vph V tt Critical Gap,T�,and Potential Capacity, cp T•,_-;'° sec(Table 10-2)cp,=/H° pcph(Fig. 10-3) . Actual Capacity, cm 7 Cm9-cp,=-- / 1° � pcph • r STEP 2:LT From Major Street I t Vi Conflicting Flow,V, V3+V7= 2-61 + 'I'-1 L=971 Critical Gap, Capacity T and Potential Ca ,� ovph(V�,) p y' c v T�= sec(Table ]0-2)cp,=o`j o pcph(Fig. 10=3) Percent of c,Utilized and Impedance Factor(Fig. 10-5) (v,/cl,,)X 100=3,01 Pi_ \fig Actual Capacity,cm cm, =cp,_g_V_o pcph STEP 3:LT From Minor Street l Conflicting Flow,.V 1/2 V3+V2+V5+V, = 15 +`I yZ 3 y 2 z _ �23 vph(vc7 Critical Gap,'T�,and potential Capacity,c T = ‘, + + y ) r ° sec(Table 10-2)cp,=3Sb pcph (Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacity,cm cm,----c1,7XP, = 3S0X19g = 3y3 pcph ` SHARED-LANE CAPACITY r 2.z. i 13 SH= v7+ V if lane is shared — ..._ ►3 (V7/Cm7)+ (V9/Cm9) �.•r 3 N o Movement ( c h) cm(pcph) csH(pcph) cp LOS 7 2_2- 3 y 3 31/4-I 3 -z4 ??7 1 4 z 7z3 , A UNSIGNAI..IZED INI ERSECIIONS 10-37 WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-IN.I'EIISECTION A �- --I-1r1s', pt-,,t c'‘�AY -1«,a LOCATION: \-).,1- \\ Ae- t\`\ . . HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPII C7-: ". \"4 7.et P,i 17 N G. V L-u:> t•S C r�i 161 S£n _ Major Street: \\\� 4I \‘'` 1 / N '1rgrlr'r1G GV=,J> lLrtC\xm, 2>Y Is)1r,oau2 f>V rNcL, N-© / Vt ���ts— Grade — V2 �2.� V,3"1 — V2 E'z_6,� V4 'I'Z % V3 — N -Eli V, S -`\ • V7 V, V7 V9 Date of Counts: 2 I I EL STOP Time Period: — 1� 0 YIELD z 15" . Average Running Speed: N=Q Minor .:;` Street: PI-IF: Grade % o3 , /\tee NE - VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS . Movement.No. 2 3 '4 5 • 7 9 Volume(vph) 2 6, z— 3 • Ut • \\%-t5 Z. 1y Vol.(pcph),see Table 10-1 —____,..,-_---,,,..7., _7. LI- - 2 \ S „? , STEP 1:RT from Minor Street /'' V9 Conflicting Flow,V, 1/2 V3+ V2= +G -G = 6/9 vph(Vo) 71i Critical Gap,Te,and Potential Capacity, cp T,= ' sec(Table 10-2)c,9= (°S. pcph(Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacity,cm en,9-cp9= 6 b5 pcph FI STEP 2: LT From Major Street I V Conflicting Flow, V, V3+V2= 'S -Fi'Z 6 =4' • vph V . Critical Gap,T,,and Potential Capacity,cp T,---`1.5 sec(Table 10-2)cp4=6 9 5 pcph(Fig. 10-3) Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor(Fig. 10-5) (v4/cp,)X 100=(� I` P4_ ' 'ri Actual Capacity,cm • c =--6 ,5 m, =cp, `)a pcph STEP 3:LT From Minor Street D il .e:1 Conflicting Flow, V� _ 3 4z4 11`I S 3 0 i3 1/2 V�+V2+VS+V� — + + } =IU , Vph(Vc7) _-ji Critical Gap,T�,and Potential Capacity,cp .T,=.._. 2_sec(Table 10-2) cf,_ `t' pcph (Fig. 10-3) . 7....) Actual Capacity, cm - cm,=c�7 X P4 _g 5 X•`1 t^ _ 9 I pcph ' '_- SHARED-LANE CAPACITY i Z + iS • .J SH= — - V 7-I-V4- if lane is shared -. - I c/. q' (V7/Cm ) t (V9/c„,9) )J 't' . jMovement No. v(pcph) cm(pcph) cso(pcph) cR LOS' 1_1 3?:': - C.,0-' I:7:9 b —I 14.\ I A ! • • Iri ' ' , , _ .PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON jil Golder Associates JUN 161989 ' J CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MINING ENGINEERS [� RECEIVE® - Iiii . , IOctober 12, 1987 Our ref: 873-1198 1 � 1 Primark Corporation 102 - 1200 South I92nd Street i Seattle, WA 98146 ATTENTION: +Ir. Guy S. Spencer '; RE: WINDSOR PLACE PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON . 1 Dear Mr. Spencer: � - This letter report presents the results of our geotechnical study of the proposed project site located north of N.E. 4th Street and west of the 1 , proposed extension of 136th~Avenue S.E. in Renton, as shown in Figure 1 • • IThe study was performed in accordance with our written proposal dated February 24, 1987. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the surficial and subsurface soil conditions at the site and develop geotechnical design recommendations. We understand the site development will consist of multi-family wood= frame structures in one-story, two-story, and two to three split configurations. The lower floors of the one-story and two-story 1 - buildings and the three-story portion of the two to three split buildings will be supported on spread footings and slab-on-grade construction. The two-story portions of the two to three. split buildings will be supported on spread footings and framed floors with a - crawl space. Drive-ways, parking areas, and single story recreation buildings are also included in the site development. Cuts and fills will be required to accommodate site development. The site study included a geologic reconnaissance, the excavation of exploration test pits, and an engineering analysis of the collected . data. The results of the explorations and our geotechnical design recommendations are given in the following sections. A preliminary I report was submitted to you on May 1 , 1987. Since the submission of that report, minor changes in the buildings layout has occurred. This report addresses the final building configuration. r 1 . FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING ' I' The field explorations were performed on April 16, 1987, and included a geologic reconnaissance which involved mapping surficial soil units and surface water manifestations, and the excavation of nine exploration E . 17 COLDER ASSOCIATES,INC.•4104 148TH AVENUE N.E..REDMOND(SEATTLE),WASHINGTON 98052 USA.•TELEPHONE(206)883•0777•TELEX 5106002944 OFFICES IN CANADA•UNITED STATES •UNITED KINGDOM•AUSTRALIA October 12, 1987 2 873-1198 Ltest pits. The test pits were excavated usinga rubber-tire backhoe under the full-time observation of a staff enineering geologist, who was responsible for locating the test pits, logging the subsurface soils, and collecting representative samples of the soils encountered in the .test pits for subsequent laboratory classification and index testing. The test pit locations, are shown on Figure 2 and the test pit logs are given in Table 1. The test pit locations were determined by compass and pacing from identifiable site landmarks and should be considered approximate. The test pits were backfilled upon completion of logging and sampling of the subsurface soils. • Representative samples of the subsurface soils encountered in the test pits were returned to our laboratory for classification and index . testing. The laboratory testing consisted of gradation analyses of • selected soil samples. The results of the laboratory tests are shown in • Figure 3. • 2. SURFACE CONDITIONS • The site is located north, of N.E. 4th Street and west of the proposed extension of 136th Avenue S.E. ; on the plateau east of Renton.. - The topography of the site is gently undulating with several approximately • east-west trending gentle swales and low ridges. The slopes on the site are gentle, except for the slope immediately north of N.E. 4th street, which-ranges between 1H:1V to 1H:2V. The southern portion of the site is currently brushy and the northern portion of the site is wooded with second-growth forest. Several existing houses, out-buildings, and old • foundations were observed on the site. At the time of the field investigation these buildings appeared to be unoccupied and abandoned except for the house located in..the .northwest portion of the site. A small creek was flowing in the gentle swale immediately north of N.E. • • 4th Street at the time of the field investigation. Surface water was not observed elsewhere on the site; however, it appeared periodic surface water flow may occur in the shallow swale south of the western prong of the property. 3. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS • .. I Based on the-field explorations, it is apparent the site is underlain by a succession of glacially derived granular soils, except for the southern portion of the site where fill was observed. A layer of topsoil and/or forest duff one half- to one foot thick overlies the glacial soils. The soils observed at the site were: • Fill ; • Fine to medium sand and sandy gravel ; and • Silty, fine to medium sand with little gravel (till ) . • Golder Associates October 12, 1987 3 873-1198 Fill was observed in only the southern portion of the site, in the area ' I north of N.E. 4th Street and the adjacent shallow swale. The fill consisted of loose silty sand with construction debris including broken concrete and asphalt slabs up to four feet wide, bricks,' rebar, and miscellaneous debris. The thickness of the. fill was variable, with the greatest accumulation beneath the relatively flat bench immediately north of N.E. 4th Street. Based on exposures in the slope that trends north from the bench into the adjacent swale, approximately 15 to 20 feet of fill may underlie this portion of the site. In the swale north. . of the bench, approximately one to five feet of fill overlied the native soil . A layer of organic soil , which probably represents the former Iground surface, was observed at the base of the fill . The majority of the. site was underlain by compact to dense, fine to medium sand, with little to trace gravel , gravelly sand, and sandy . I gravel . In the central portion of the site (test pits TP-2,. TP-3, TP-8, and TP-9) , the sand and gravel ranged between three to five feet in thickness and overlied till, as discussed below. . The sand and gravel I appeared to thicken to the north, where in the north-central portion of the .site (test pits TP-4 and TP-7). the base of the unit was not encountered, and then thin and finally pinch-out beneath a swale the . - northern portion of the site (TP-5 and TP-6) . A grain-size distribution for a sample of the sand is given in Figure 3. The till unit was encountered in only the northern portion of the site I (TP-5 and TP-6) and beneath the sand unit in the central portion of the site (TP-2, TP-3, TP-4, TP-8, and TP-9) . The till consisted of dense to very dense, silty, fine to medium sand, with little gravel . In test. pits TP-5, TP-6, and TP-8, a loose to compact weathered zone, one to two - feet thick, overlied the dense unweathered till . Based on the . . explorations, till is probably continuous at depth beneath the site. Groundwater was encountered in the southern, northern and western portions of the site at depths ranging from three to seven feet. The groundwater flows in the test pits were typically slight, consisting er predominantly of seeps on the side of the test pits. The exception to this was in TP-1,' where groundwater immediately filled the test pit below a depth of three feet. Groundwater was not encountered in the test pits excavated in the east-central portion of the site (TP-2, TP-3, TP-4)- . . . .. . I4. GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIOft . 4.1 Foundations . 1 . Based on the results of the geotechnical explorations, it is our opinion' _. the site is suitable for the proposed development utilizing conventional spread footings. The footings may be supported on the undisturbed jnative compact to dense granular soils or properly compacted structural fill . The footings should be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) , which may be increased i by one-third to accommodate short-term transient loads. Colder Associates ill. . October 12, 1987 4 ._ ,_ _.� _ $73 1]98 • Based on the findings of the test pit exploration program, we anticipate I that competent bearing soils will -generally be encountered approximately one to three feet below the ground surface. In localized areas such as in the southern portion of the site, three to 15 feet of excavation may be required to reach adequate bearing soils beneath the fill . Footings should not be founded on or above the topsoil , loose silty sands, or existing fills. Excavations required to reach adequate bearing soils should extend . laterally beyond the footings 'a-distance equal to the depth of cut below footing grade. Typically, the soils likely to be encountered in the bottom of the excavation will be fine to medium sand, gravelly sand, and silty sand with little gravel (till ) . The silty soils are likely to be - moisture sensitive and easily disturbed when wet; however, disturbance can be minimized with attention to proper drainage and, if necessary the use of a,working mat of clean granular material . We recommend soils • which are naturally loose or loosened by construction activity be.-. Iremoved or pre-compacted with. a suitable mechanical compactor prior to I construction of the footings or placement of compacted structural fill . We recommend a representative of- Golder Associates observe-the excavations prior to fill placement or footing construction. Provided the native bearing soils are not disturbed during construction, and structural fills are properly placed and compacted, total and differential settlements' should be less than one inch, with the majority of the movement occurring during construction. 1 4.2 , Floors , . 1 Floor slabs may be founded on properly compacted structural fill or the . native compact to dense granular soils. All topsoil , fill , and loose . materials should be stripped prior to construction. We recommend. soils • r- . _ which are naturally loose or .loosened by construction activity be removed or pre-compacted with 'a suitable mechanical compactor. All. ' floor slabs should be underlain .by a mat' of clean, 'free-draining granular material at least four inches thick. • 4.3 Earthworks and Grading Prior to construction, all vegetation, topsoil , loose soils, 'fill , and debris should be removed. -All structural fill (fill which will support buildings or pavements) should be placed in maximum eight inch loose lifts and compacted to at least ,95 percent of modified Proctor maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557., We recommend the areas to receive fill be observed by a representative of Golder Associates and: that fill : r placement be monitored and tested during construction. '. • The explorations in the southern portion of the site revealed that groundwater occurs near the base of the existing fill in this area. ' r Therefore, the required excavations to remove the existing fill may.• not .. be completely in the dry and may difficult to complete, particularly • at times when the groundwater levels are high. Since it. may not be I . • iil:v. - Golder.Associate . y . October 12, . 1987 � 5 873-1198 possible to place the first lift completely in the dry and because the• • . . • • subgrade soils may be saturated, it may be necessary that clean gravel • backfill be'placed in the initial first few lifts over subgrade in this - area in order to provide a suitable base for continued structural fill placement. Details regarding this should probably be determined in the . field by the engineer at the time of construction. ' Structural fill material should be free of organics, debris, or other • -_-_ deleterious material . The surficial organic-rich topsoil will not be • suitable for use as structural ,fill material , but may be used in general " • " landscape areas. The native sand, gravelly sand; sandy gravel , and till will be suitable for onsite structural. fill . The till , however, _ . contains silt and will be more moisture-sensitive and more difficult. to • - • properly compact during wet or inclement weather when proper moisture conditioning cannot be accomplished, than the sand, gravelly sand, and sandy gravel: If earthworks must be performed in wet weather, when proper moisture conditioning is not possible, we recommend. the onsite clean sand, gravelly ,sand, and sandy gravel be used as the structural . fill material . - General site grading will_ be required for the proposed development, with . • cuts and fills up to approximately eight to ten feet. All sidehill fills should be benched to the undisturbed native soils after the . topsoil has been removed. We recommend sidehill fills and -fills which' . ' • cross topographic lows be provided with suitable internal drainage , . provisions to prevent saturation and build-up of water pressures in the fill material , which could decrease the stability of• the fill . . This-is . particularly critical if. the fills -are not constructed of free-draining, - granular materials. ' ■ Permanent cut or fill slopes should, be constructed to an inclination of . 2H:1V or flatter. If steeper slopes are required, they will have to be . addressed in• a case-by-case basis. Permanent slopes should be properly revegetated with a suitable- dense, fast-growing, vegetative cover. 4.4 Lateral Earth Pressures We understand some of the structures will be designed with basements; • the basement walls will function as retaining structures. The following., equivalent fluid pressures should be utilized for the design of these walls, assuming a horizontaT..backsope and no adjacent. surcharges: , • Non-yielding. 50 lbs./sq. ft./ft. of depth • • .Yielding walls: 35 lbs./sq. ft./ft. of depth ! • Base friction coefficient: 0.35 - -- These values assume a fully-drained wall section and therefore, do not i-,--i allow for! hydrostatic pressures. We 'recommend all walls be provided . with positive 'drainage consisting of at least two feet of clean, free draining granular backfill and footing drains with a suitable discharge. l . - Surcharges ..from adjacent: buildings or other loads should be added to the , . Golder Associates 1H . / • • . i October 12, 1987 6 873-1198 - : • above values. We recommend a minimum factor of safety of.1.5 be incorporated in the analysis against sliding. 4.5 Drainage Considerations ' . . , 1 It is our opinion that a well engineered and maintained drainage control . system will facilitate site development. During construction, all...:. , . surface water should be intercepted and directed away from excavations li and fills. Temporary' swales and/or sumps may be required to control • . runoff and near surface groundwater as construction progresses. - Groundwater Was observed at the site at varying depths and perched 11 groundwater zones and lenses may encountered at the site and should be anticipated. The amount of groundwater inflow will probably vary seasonally. In some cases, the seepage may become evident after a cut 4 . • has. been open for some time.. Dewa,tering methods, such as sumps and pumps, may be required to minimize disturbance to the excavation subgrade. All water should be directed away from the crests of slopes . 11 and should be prevented from accumulating near the toe of slopes. re During construction, all cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting. As discussed in Section 4.3, sidehill fills and fills which � • cross topographic lows should be provided with suitable internal i • drainage provisions. Drainage provisions should ensure that groundwater and surface water • " . does not accumulate adjacent to floor slabs or foundation walls. We • recommend that below-grade elements floor slabs be provided with subdrains which discharge by tightline to a suitable outlet. Roof leaders should be directed away from the structures in .a separate tightline system. During construction, it may become apparent that-..some building locations may require additional groundwater control - provisions. If necessary, this may consist of an interceptor curtain . drain located upslope of the structure. The curtain drains should . discharge to a suitable outlet. 4.6 11 Access Road The proposed site access road will be an extension of 136th Avenue S.E. , . li north from 4th Avenue along the projects east property line. The road is to be built with the embankment fills as close as possible to the . . ,� east property line. As a result-,-a retaining wall will be required to support the road fill embankment and prevent the embankment from. -- ' . . -. - encroaching on the adjacent property. The proposed retaining wall wily . . rise to a maximum height of 12 feet with an overall average height of . 11 about eight feet, and extend in length for approximately 300 feet. The road will be designed and constructed with a continuous steel guard rail supported on posts embedded along the top outside edge of the roadway. . 11 We understand the wall is planned as a temporary structure, designed- to 11 support the roadway embankment...until additional property is acquired, possibly within the next year. At your request, we evaluated the' economic feasibility of both Gabion and Ecology Block type gravity. walls .. for this application. Our non rigorous evaluation indicated the lower 1 Golder Associates . 4 • IL ' October 12. 1987 7 873-1198 Illi construction costs and the salvage value of the temporary Ecology Block • wall make the block wall significantly less expensive than the Gabion . design. Based on our evaluation Mr. John Nelson of ESM directed us to limit our detailed recommendations to Ecology Block walls. 111 Mr. Nelson expressed a concern that the proposed steel guard rail at the top of the wall may tend to displace the wall blocks if the rail were hit by a loaded.'dump truck. Based on our analysis the typical 6x6 inch 111 guard rail post embedded three to four feet will fail the soil behind the post and/or shear and break before transferring load sufficient to displace the top blocks in the wall . In our opinion no additional restraint is required to prevent displacement of the wall blocks for the � ,� above mentioned case. IL4.6.1 Wall Design • The proposed wall is a gravity type retaining wall designed to resist _1111 ' the lateral earth pressures imposed by a level , free draining, compacted • backfill and an evenly distributed 200 psf traffic load surcharge. The . individual blocks' are not tied together, and therefore the wall is not capable of resisting tension deformations. However, the relatively - heavy blocks are capable of resisting the lateral loads of the backfill 7i and the traffic surcharge by 'means of their mass, the base friction and shear keys. The wall should consist of large rectangular concrete blocks locally .r called Ecology Blocks. These type of blocks are traditionally made from waste or low strength concrete and are available from the local concrete' . suppliers. Typically, the blocks are mass concrete without reinforcement, and therefore they should be carefully selected to obtain sound uncracked blocks. . , The concrete blocks should be formed with a minimum six inch wide shear key on the top and a key slot on the bottom such that the blocks can be stacked. The blocks should have a lifting eye on top and squared corners that will allow the blocks to be stacked in a close fitting , pattern. . . 11 The proposed wall should be constructed with the blocks stacked to form a smooth face on the outside, and a stair stepped configuration on the rear face. The long dimension of`each block should be' stacked into.the II embankment in accordance with the configuration shown on the cross sections, Figures 4 and 5. Additional recommendations for the proposed wall are presented below. II • Wall Bearing Material Compact Sandy Gravel or' • Gravelly Sand , : : • Minimum Embedment 1 foot below surrounding finished grade • Block Dimensions . - 2 x 2 x 6 feet PI _____ .. . • 111 Golder Associates October 12, 1987 8 873-1198 2x2x3feet • • Minimum Inclination of -6 Degrees (1H:12V) . Wall. Base .and Front Face 4.6.2 Wall Earthworks - ' Site preparation in most areas will consist of stripping the three to six inches of topsoil , all vegetation, surficial materials, and removing . the existing overhead utilities from the roadway. We expect all the site soils can be excavated with conventional earth moving.equipment. If the stripped surface or any excavations on this site are allowed to become.wet, the subgrades can be easily disturbed and reduced to a slurry type consistency. To avoid excessive site disturbance, the contractor should implement protective measures. These measures should include, . but not be limited to, the placement of either a thin layer of pea gravel , crushed rock, or a lean concrete mud mat over the prepared . • and, approved subgrad.e. . Wall backfill should be placed in eight inch loose lifts and compacted to at least the minimum recommended density with a steel wheeled vibratory, roller. If density. tests in the backfill indicate compaction is not being achieved, the uncompacted fill should be removed, moisture conditioned and recompacted or replaced with crushed rock. . • Wall Backfill . . . Free draining 'sandy gravel or gravelly sand with less than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4 inch fraction. Maximum size is 6 inches. • Minimum Compaction 90 percent of ASTM D '1557 . 5.--USE OF THIS-REPORT . . This report has been prepared exclusively for the use of the Primark Corporation and their consultants for specific application to this ' project. The investigation has been performed in accordance with generally accepted local geotechnical engineering practices to provide • geotechnical information to allow finalization of the site planning. 1.111 There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and in the groundwater conditions with time. We recommend a contingency for unanticipated conditions be included in the , construction schedule and budget. Further, we recommend we be retained to perform monitoring and testing during construction to confirm the conditions Micated by the explorations, and/or provide corrective., recommendations adapted to conditions revealed during the work. • Golder Associates . October 12, 1987 9 873-1198 4 We are available to answer any questions you might have concerning this I report or to discuss our recommendations with you or your consultants in further detail . Sincerely,10 . • GOLDE IOC tAT( SalC. • • Cliffor C. Knitter Senior,. Engineering Geologist Patrick Corser, P.E. Associate CWL/PC/irw/590 I • Attachments 1 • • • I • Golder Associates • • if:r • • L'? ?fj'+ '', i , 6 ,,±,t i • Imp;Fl�,�SF ;,: pi .. ....• • • . • , . JMi .. . �`!t . . . . .. . . ., r 1 d _ . ....... . . . . . • • t '''`"Y ' • • • TEST PIT LOGS • if. ',�C'' - • • . s ll,.'F'J71 1+A4. • •,,,,„,,,,..,,....„....!„.• ... . .. . . .' . .. , . ' w''pp"'J:,, . . . . • - . r t 4, �::. ! r -�, s1, 1;.i ,. • it` ris!. ,i • G a1•'.>i. • 1tV,',ar:r•n: .<: 1.c'.,i,.••'. it'f.4 ';i., r , • • • ' ,fit•,'%;•'' •�7't • .. .,. .... *. . . . .. A. t n,,r: +';'``:,�: Golder Asso i.t R,, caes ,,. -_I TP-4 Ii 0 to 1.0 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, • silty SAND (TOPSOIL)• LI _ _ _ . 1.0 to 4.5 ft 'Compact, brown, massive, fine SAND, little to trace • j - silt, trace gravel and trace roots above 1.0 ft 4.5 to 7.5 ft Dense, gray, massive, silty, fine to medium SAND; : little gravel , occasional boulders >12 inches 1 Test pit was terminated at 7.5 ft depth. 'No water was encountered in the test pit depth. IEzi 0 to 1.0 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, ,silty SAND (TOPSOIL.) 1.0 to 2.0 ft Loose, brown, silty, fine to medium SAND, little . gravel and roots (WEATHERED TILL) 2.0 to 7.5 ft Dense, gray to mottled gray-brown, silty, fine to • medium SAND, little gravel (TILL) . • Test pit- was terminated at 7,0 ft depth, Water seeps were encountered 3.0 ft depth. 11111 TP-6 0 to 1.0 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL) l' •* 1.0 to 3.0 ft Compact, brown, silty, fine to medium SAND, little gravel (WEATHERED TILL ) I - 3.0 to 7.0 ft Dense, gray, massive, silty, fine to medium SAND, little. gravel '(TILL) • Test pit was terminated at 7.0 ft depth. Water seeps were encountered 3.0 ft depth. . J':,; '+ . y7 if477r` Golder Associates a I TABLE 1 . ` TEST PIT LOGS* ir l '::.. . —. TP-1 . Ir . 0 to 2.0 ft . Loose, brown, silty SAND, little construction debris, • consisting• of broken concrete and asphalt slabs up to 4 ft, bricks, rebar, and other debris ' . . .. 2.0 to 2.5 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL) 2.5• to 4.0 ft Compact, brown, massive, sandy GRAVEL, trace cobbles . . . Test pit was terminated at 4.0 ft depth. Water filled • test pit immediately below 3.0 ft depth. TP-2 0 to 1.0 ft Loose, dark brown silt .. . .. (TOPSOIL) y SAN D, little organics 1.0 to 5.0 ft Compact to- dense, brown, massive, sandy GRAVEL and gravelly SAND • '1, 5.0 to 7.0 ft Dense, gray; massive, fine to medium sandy SILT, ' 1 .. little gravel (TILL) Test pit was terminated at 7.0 ft depth. No water was ` ' encountered in the test pit depth. ' • TP-3 0 to 1.0 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL) 1.0 to 2.0 ft Loose, brown, massive, fine SAND, little silt and 11 . roots 2.0 to 6.0 ft Compact, brown, massive, fine SAND, little to trace silt. . . 6.0 to 7.0 ft Dense, gray, massive, silty, fine to medium SAND, little gravel (TILL) Test pit was terminated at 7.0 ft. depth. No water. was . ;encountered in the test pit depth. Ill • - . Golder Associates es TP-7 j ' , ' 0 to 0.5 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL). 7: . 0.5 to 2.5 ft Loose, brown, fine SAND, little silt 2.5 to 4.5 ft . Compact, brown, fine SAND, little to trace silt and gravel 4.5 to 8.0 ft Dense, gray, medium SAND, little gravel , Test pit was terminated at 8.0 ft depth. Water seeps were encountered 7.0 ft depth. TP-8 - 0 to 0.8 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL) ;u,,. 0.8 to 3.0 ft Loose, brown, silty SAND, little gravel • . 3.0 to 5.0 ft Compact, brown; silty, fine to medium SAND, little I -,. ' gravel (WEATHERED TILL) • i r ` 5.0" to 7.5 ft Dense, gray.., massive, silty, fine to medium SAND, _ , ,; .' little gravel (TILL.) . E ;: Test pit was terminated at 7.5 ft depth. Water seeps -...k; ', were encountered 4.5 and 6.5 ft depth. • I. 'J TP-9 !' 0 to 1 .0 ft Loose, dark brown, organic, silty SAND (TOPSOIL) ' J 4 1.0 to 5.0 ft Loose to compact, brown, massive, fine to medium SAND, f€'' ' little to trace silt, roots, and gravel �+ 5.0 to 9.0 ft Dense, gray, massive, fine to medium SAND, little , ,;. gravel , trace silt (TILL) • _[1 ``{ Test pit was terminated at 9.0 ft depth. . Water seeps , • were encountered 6.5 ft depth. i ., Test pits were excavated and logged on April 16, 1987. Test pit ,' locations are shown on Figure 2._ j-,b,,.'• , ;fir.t� ;1,14' - ekl , 1 , f'?Y. ;`' Golder Associates "• •-'-',-,1'.''''...”."1',1'.',-1"i C.-'1',^Ti.';,,i,ii:41,,',/s,'!',,T,I\;,.`..7N,NO!,'Or., -. •'; . , • _. -- . ., . h• 4, . . , ' . . . .• . . ,. . . . • • --'--- •-I . . .. . . ' - • ' ' Siblig10409211 4OP °0 • ,, ,':.,.:'.:'•r;.:1::''.'- ''.''.:'•-'''..',• f-.,..?:tZ:','At.15.„,‘ .' • •;,-. •,... ., ,-...,!::•*•,''4,..;..-4m41,A.tilt,ekv.!,;,;:.•,..r•Iiit,...cigi-,4t,e...ir..,;,_:',..,%.4.ki'i'..4.4;' ,. ., . .; -!..,, ,,•., -..' •:,,r r: 'r.,:!,,,,,1:0.;,,.'', .,,?,, (,t''.,.;11%Y.''1:3:".q1.1 . . , ., .. • ,,.., .: ,.. ...,•,..,,,..4,, ...„ ,,...,......,,„..,,,„..„...„,„„„..4.,•,..,,,.,... •,.. • .If...,..4 . . ... " : j •,•A','•.,.T:.','-I' ,. ,,:,:. ip, 4-',i.A .,..r..) ),.;*.2g-,, ,,,infl 1:' . , . . . • --.. ': ':•:-'; •',:;',: .011,1.•;;:A,:; vit.......',, i.-0,::1:4,;04q;`'T''''. . . . '• ,?,'.;:l" t;.,;'4P':',fil,!..?1.,,,„:,.':.,,ftiy., , ., r ,:;•r ,I-;,',..' ., ,,'.*.'.."!',...!•:0"`'.".-▪i;i2.,';f14...:.1.;i•:....--00.'.-.:?..pl,.,,,,,,,IN'T.4.:,,11...* .• ':..:'•: .'' t '1 `,•••,- 'I. '..,,,,• . p.• ,,'•••• •:-• ..,... . ,.•...-..,) ,..f..:t.,. t . ;.;' ::. .. ,....•.i.••,-::::::iw,(1.....•-:,t:-...P.r .i.,rg,..1.1.,-,,,,9:4:k..1,• ,.•.: i••• • • . .... ,, ..: .-'-:::-".•-•..-f.'";?1•1..t.4:!-"-.1-4,i',•,i--:',''"•.;4•"4,•,':••'''rtri,l''',.11,1iff.';'''i--fr•k• ;'.."..t.i....-',11'..4:'-'• '..' '•":', ,...7.'''. _ • . ' ' • ••'. '...••':',1 ''',.'•••••••••••''1.'.:".1It"••'711"?;'''.. 0/74•411.4•11,44'4,1",,$ •'• • •.... ,,:.!1'..•.''..,:::::•-•;.:„2,.:',:p,t,:•.!::,t1v;"tip.-1-10.•,•,',•.:t,-;41-i!,:;`-c#I11,144:-1.411"',1,§•141 'r' ;-• ' - . .. •'" • ti• ::44.?..,riv,e,,,;.• • ,:..,,,.'.i.‘••,..-.,. • •.. • , . t. . • . ., .,........-.....-..•, •. : „.-;.•.;•,..,,,:,;;,..,,,,,,,,,-..,o,,,.,,,-,,, i,,,,.R,I,,...t. .,‘i 1,14 , 41, A, , .,., • ,..-•t:P. v&I,..;!...,',',P;E•1•611,1,,,,o,r,,ir.4 1, ''• ,../ 4,l• f'• i'..;!.-..:•'.i.;::•! t.C:• ;... '"-•' \ ''.' :: • : . -• t . . • • , ,. , . „,,..4,k 1•,,,r'II':,•••?::,,•'4,,,-„,i),:r.,.'zi.. •,-•-••••••moit:rtir,;4.,..p„...-1,„,.,,. ..- ' --'•.1-." ... - .....-,,i1...,,.,1....,..er.1,7,1;7,,,...s.A.?..VF....,.....91,prel. •15Q,41,',4 F5 -, • !'..A;;ii,,',k.:',-,.:....,•::::';,,-)•',..,,,.. ,,..,..:. •..,,.•-.•... - • r ... . . • -,.;.-i-•',1.1..,,,;:!......s1,,'-': .i,'5,1.,,..i,.,-,.,4-.:)9,•.::.c.,rol.t.„.,14,,,,,g,,,o, ? • . . •.,,. . ,,..,...,,,:!,q,, r.ttlt,..ti..1.0.!.. ' .:? .-...-::...: :::,.,-:...0.!!....'F, :',•'-:-:,•0'.;''t-‘1t:.(4..;-• .:,,-.F.•;11.e4;'...,'..;'-i....,;•..41'1', 11.P.'1 Li . I ,. 7 r. :.',.,+.,,•,,Fir;;;;,',!:'p,,,,.t'Pli.i.'fi',.;,,,kri.1‘11•'if.,,....;;,:t ii...1:::1m1r01,)-fill.i. t . 4,.......,;.;;:;,..,.-:, . . , . . _.„.,,,.„...,. •... 4-,.,,,,,,%* ',..4"..i'f.''''i I 01,4-'f',1-71.14,414,'' '" • . ...• " ,-I.'-'k'.r";.z,...t;.:1:,:‘,;:c,..,•••',1t3;iel,,,..,''.."-I Qa,',,,,,:•-v,:,,I.,NA- ,',., - ..." . . ' . '• -:• ;'F.',...''''."';';,..,'',,''','''!1',..I.-.17`i^.•,,,l';'-: q'f1 ,1'1',0'....'..-0,„,,,i-:;? .r.., J .• .i,•,•?i..,,...-:;••". ,t•'p•,,,tot- g•taiy.,-;Z!,•i'HC4';; ;,'e'61°.4-'11_.,1'...:1`1,,VAN-'',,,.•' ••i . •• - • 7...---- .' .. •:. ,.. ' '.-,' ''".-K,,,,'','••:,•:',:;-•lif:'Vt,t,r4'..,";•,11..tki'34,11,111,F..ii41,i•Tfill,.", . , • , .•• , , • • „.,.;••.• ••,',,..-.•.i.-'..-.:..-A,1,11.,,,...1:"..•i!....'‘'..0..,"' P-!,,,..,-;,.,.,,,.',1,r:,5/0,40q...1-1.1.4,,,, 1 ,.,-...... ..,c..0..,."....,,J 01.1R-4.2.0.oei•••,3Y,r;i 'l:•4-'''' -th,-S:1,1''‘'''' ' ' .•:. •.•V,.,•. c.•'..• ..:-, t•'•••.: -•. •'' . : • • .. . _ . --• ' .'• '''.f-':•-::":;',:.•:'';'.•':- •:.•';'tf111.,•'..:Ii0:.c.c•:1t'i,;• ,e.Y.•>Oti ,I.: . .. - ./.1,i''..a'''-',;:•'•••.',.'!'• ..'" ,'-•' •,.• :-- . •...! . . ... . ••• . • ••,,.. 'i• ,:.:.,,.:•,..,....,.',....;',1 eiia,,,x.;;TI., ',,,,.,,-;•3)1'4.0!4',1.iti;•;,',;,,kit-14,'Itgt,"'1;' ---• - — : . ':..,c; :-(o,'.;,:. 4,•;;;a•?•-•, ,•ir,o'zi.1,,,,,,,4,("1;ZA.'A,r'ti• - ',.....c.-.1 :'.. ".. •• . • : '. • . - .: ...:.. •••,,-::.:-..t.;;1!.:,,,ir:::,4,),;;;:.,-..:,-,,JArrp.itt••:11:-:,t4tt-ra.:4,14•16:1A . . - : • ..•,•'•'••'::,•,1.,,,...-,,,IJEA•cr- ,7,t):,*,v.,1;)•Itt,rr"tra,;•:,::',er,o• • • ; . • - •:-.:o :••••;• 't....11,1"',,,-.•••%;:•,,I,V,61...q..iAlg:„.,,,2,j(.441,1,,,,-. • - • . .• • , , :..:,•'-,i • ,.-,,; M,14,1iPil•f-1W4.11,41,A.. :It. n• .' . • .I..'Z•':'.''.••i..:;: k ViinleZ440,!,:i*X74474: i,''....:4)-3'•.'.'''' ' .. . . . , .., . , ''• ' ",:-'''•-'.0:.11,7 11•4:%.i'llsO9; rii,;•,,4%4T.,4-,T,,,,',f/V,:if,P...11P,',,..,,.'' • f . . c. .. ,;•.-!••,;;.c,',-,...,,(,f,,.3,4.):.11.,' -..'.:1.',1,,..0.;1/44,11,f1:f;V:, ..`e./,‘ st JP.3" jOti$,.2.4 tigqltni • .. '- 3... '.1.:;:i-1-,,4 q.,.',.14.:il'...4'. ',,Y11-1,4`14 Q.A.47+,,11, :-..t4',ft,,,,,, • . .• ,.... ,.. ,,,A...,.,,..il i.,?;.-:,,r. .(:;;; 1,,..,./:.;...,.3.,.,14. .0...i,A.51,,,,,. .1,..,.:,,...„...... . ...,,. ,,..,...,.. f:,• ..,„F,4..p..,....,,..•%,f.1.14010-44,4 mv, ,,vv..44-44',1,k . . . . .• • . ... • '.',':,1'.'ii'I f ......-, •' '; ' ' '.- • r . ..2 :1: ." • , • • . •. . ,. .• . I.A...:....,;j. ''''''1.0 ,!:.i ,t i'04,44.1itli,;j1,.!144 3,V.0 t 9.',441:PL; •:.'0,;',!.,..-;•.:".•: •••,„:,„. . : ,..: ,-,., . .;• ..,,i .. , • . . . - .':—-''.' -:4::1.:.,',F"!*•..''.`4.;.;;;'il.:l;,.4R; -,74014.;ili);::114.1, i:q1IPT:$4:7017,1:#'P; %.....;°-..7'.,%,•.•:•...i.-:•',' ••i: •, • ••'•' • , !-•'. . . - , : 1.• „. .•.. ..1....,.;•i••••,. ,/..,,,e,igq,,p •,,o!...„:.., ,•,:1„ii, ,..!,-.,.i.,-...4: ••••• 1. . . " :: . . .. ' ••.,: , . .('.'...1,:.' '!"•:'V,A.:ttlyzetii.1.1'.;!Ift4k.7*,; ',0i'<1:i';04:P.c.'.•il: . . • . '. . .,, •• . '" 1i=likki`!44'.,'A.V4.t. ‘,i...,,,....,,, ....•...-.--r .;' • .: • . • . • . . . • :- : • , •"-Nt-t .. ..... .,4 ,1,... p.ki..1,,,, . , . • . . ,......., .. . , -• ,, • •-., ,..,.....:-;',i' ...,,,,,e.,',.11-1Z.(2-;1:41,414.W.Ff,,,,',4N^;%,111.•1,45.40,N :,......••••;-.:1:...;.:.'. .4 i.•i. ,• ,:: ; . „-,..- : .::,':-. :-..: • • •- , •-,,: : •,•-•,% -.'!".•,:.•.- -4,?i0K.:IPIk4,'...,4r4,11,...V!Y•Otiicc'ti; •,,. ,-,,, 441. tle,,e.er tlx,+,4-.Vi4,,I,Tf-i'lt,,,"/'S'• .,.4.;,i-2,.i.'i ..,',:. :'••.i. .1',•---• '''. • -. . • ,.,:,,,,,t1 $,;;....'iT,t 4-10.,;.. , ,i,;,../tpc;•,•-r•,,- ..,,,e,04. •. . :-.-':' :-;:.•:•':•:•;i1••-••?;•?-t,',::!,.;'),--1;.•,;;••.•1441-,4'41C:.t',44.4iit,.,:,•:•-:',.';•Ittg:',1,g13,,,i,t'l.,,,to,;--i,'' 4 . -.,;iJ.....e.ff.,,,i''. 1',,..:',.•,: ....... .,,:.,„.-;'t . .':'- ,••• • ; !j :'...., • . - .:. :,...:.,.,',:..t.::!.'.:f•;:'.:•1•::1!",,,:ft:'.",4111''.!:.-e:4'';';:•1P'1'1,::':iirti;A:l.:';',,0',...f441)41,.k-41.,,.!,,s:rik'll.i.:1'.;. ,I.,,t-i''''4•:',,.q':•;4:1.1,:;.1:,,,th:',,,,":,'Y'.C:w•:•''''''''.5.;":it: ',4t:1'..i'..:•' - '1•,..•:ii',1 :•-.... ;'''.1.'.:•:-i•••.'...i•-•••••'...•.s..,---- •:-•:. ; '• •:-.: '••• ,' ' • '-• ••• • :: ' '-. .. '• •' :,' . . ' , . i...,,,i,?..c,:,;:-.1%.>:.:tc,,!,t1.•:,.:,!. 414.1,:-.,,•.,:p.'.r, ' .tO '''',.-illjikti ,,,,,1, ,),., f,..:' '1,,,';',f,';:tt:t•''t';'.,'i.."5::: ' .. ...-';'1••::-:::; . •..: -',.,',i:' •i• ','.tr.,' . ' • i; '';''• ' ' '''',. , .',....vi,'.:•••.-.1.1A:i;i(•?,',I:. ;:''.,',-,.-,,::,,..":,' ...''.,'..:.:';'.'.. .!,.,'',', •• ; ...,;',.,-.1 i.,.-:•. .:1!',... •; ;"i.....•''.,','' ! -• i.' -,..' ,',.P.";.•;,f:',•-,,',...''. '•1.3:"..:;,li,.!'''L.N.A:‘;'1'...•':!.:'...:•''''.'....7'''.!.:,!7.C:''•;',...,::,,.'t.. ,!-•/..; :.f.:•.....',',•••i'., ;r•,•','• •' ''., ... .•-•...—--•.. •--• . • •, ,,,,i,. ,,,-.;;;.;,.,. .i,,.',.•,t,...,0, /...,, 54-41.4,?44...:.4,"..g,q,kii:c.ier'3•12/1-,, t . 'I•• li'''.'-' . ..,,,...1?.,•;;;;?..,e.i. ...,..;,!•';:,,,;T•.i.... ,•••,:•.'z,;;,„i...:•..•;_ e :„s;. t. '-: ' ,.,.:: i r..•. •1:•,' ;; ; !- • '. • . . :-.•:;'..::•':1,0,1q;tiAi'Als.'',,41t•Afill.,,,,'}`f05')_,,i4.•I'tt'i;Ar*:;'47d. ';'.4',...,.'' ',,,"-i,'ill..V'•••••::,;,.•,'..•.',.....:-.'7,...,4.,-,:it.',..•,..g ...1:,2 -II,. :•-•,',,:i"..•::,..,..'4,:),---.:t.-.,,,;..,,.....,;,,,,,„...,....,.p.,,:ti..;..,. j,,,.: ,. ,;,. .. • :•:.: .:- •' i;:. ‘,;••••,.. . : •• ' :: ,::-.- ' '• . -c.:•;.i:i 1(-"',•:.:• 10.?.:"-•;,:',•-••!?.•.:1-tI!,-.'"°•irk,i0.:5501FPI,Zfe0,,;,'4,,t;;;.>:' • ;'-'f.: •lit'..i..i.t.:::L.,.4.,..,.i.,:...iii,.::„,,',,'.--.; ,,•3,2:.-..,-,,,,.. i...., ...,..- J-....- . ,...- . .I.,. ., , .'.i'.1,...:'...........•,:'!4,hi:4,74'k.',9).-iltt...0.41,ititi:`5jqii,....,414-•'•-4'; - ,i..•,....,•.-4..,•.2.,,,,,,,,,-:-.:,•,.. ,;''.z.r..,4:,'y,,„„,,,,,•vtitti pe,..-4,,,„ „t,•• ., .. - 1.:4,..,'1...-4,..,..,,.,:,-:.,:,:.' .'i...:.::.,.. '.... '..,. ..... .....,,... „.:.; .....-.:...: . .. . . „ •., --r..---"T._. ';fr....'....e.•',.-,,...:'i•J•17," 'l'-I,- • 1,; .:; 1 ,: • , • i:.r',.., ,.. !.. . a ON:i4}It q•k,..A.,,,,,, ,,,,,• g,a, ,,,,Glito,,,,,,,p . ,..:Filo-1-k.•4014,..., :•:.;*;‘,-•.7•`.....it.•05.-•:!-;•••,:t.,-;ir.;1.4,6T:•.• 4,-s:a• •Itry-q.;i:44-X-fo.‘44t,)•411•:7;f41:4,-,4 , )k!::',..1';•,;41•••$,?..;, :.- ....,:! id..,;n1. ,. .!•;•..q*:...;:.•;1_t'!.-:'• !,-• -• : • f.,,..,,,',1•1 :1: .., ••••••.••- • • • .•• -••;••.- hr•-"-i•-•711,•-••;••=-10k:,10..`"It ''4..1....‘4.1 c-''I!'F'!::::,2,:.'rz..?;..,14.0,..1F,44-‘,, y,..;,.. ;,;,f,•41,:c.t,.:::,‘,'i•.'-,,,...tc,',.......7,4!.,..,:,...;,.i,'11,""•,,..... .',1-.....i.:„......• •, • , !•• ' -• ' • • •'-••• •'''-•-••.. • ''.' :''.'..!...:. ...!'.,..:i!,,,,,e.,...,?:,k4 V it P-.4110-.4,,N)'..-.,['.1 14:fiti.??p,,ri.0.2(Igtv?,.., .,..??-•4'..,ie f'.','.'1 i'i.5 1,.."K..,. ...',':, - l',..,:,':`,.''...,' I • ''"',I' 54'..s.! .. , • •.- , .. f':.!'.'i,.!. , 4isfrs4;.', i..,.,..0.,,q.f.'.;',;Lifes.;'4,,,,,,i ,T.Ac.'w.T.• ,-;E.":•: =1.:•';',.'-',..,J'..,::;.f'•.:i-'::'.';;:.,...:i,;:k,-,; ':. • . ,,. .....: ''''i.'. '' - ' '- :. . : : ,..,..., ...„•,..,..k, ; ,,,p-.Rii• ,,.-,!:,, .- , '•-'''',',.';:fi'..t!7;,-'..::': 1,'t..' .1:',,,;,,,,:':,,' .',.;;•: '''.;;.'.....::',,I.• ; . ';.;.-:' .'. , ... . ' • 1. •-•..:',-,„:".;..,,'`.ii,;,..) l.'1W.,?4,4'‘',V,'...•4•1W,,,'.4P,' ,, ,,...(.1.5 ... •'-- .... -',:: ?A-';,•:::'g:;!•,•-:"'+‘F• 0. '4,,r,,Izg,,,,e:A.,:'s''t,_'. •,,i1 •,..,.. .';',','I'.'''..1::-..'..'1'..' ..!'0,•.'. '.: :..,.. .-,.',. • ..'..: ' . . . .• .. .....•..- • -..,...;,•..i-., :-.,-,......-. ir,-::,-):.f.'41(,-Vi'i';•.'4414..e4:',.i 4.'t3t'?.',•';'i,i`41•.40•11$1,1"- ''''. ' .. q•,,,.,•,'••••,..i',c- i.,1.'',31,14(1-4,,' , , -." ., . . . - -- -"• ,,.', !,:...:. ,.....•../.,.,-,,,.,•,:,,,I.,.,7,,,..4i.,,,,w c...,-..,..e..,,,,,,,.,.i41.,-, , :-,t;•:-..': ..-,.: _ .,,,., .ii.• ;....., i.L..•,..,,,,.:!..,,,,‘.q-Al;•..,,t..,x,.,.,. .,ci.in,;.$....0-0.. ..,04,4i,Ft.,.... . . . , , . . . • , .' .-... . • • , .. •....i. • ,....i• -:i.L.:-..!,, .4...,:ikif..:;PIIFtv.,,i1.;1.)vi •-,•,.2,-ly,11 '...:',. '•'••••: '..:-;•: 1 ! ' tv.... ••,: •---•••; '• • - - • • '• . :.-•:':1• •-•'.:-••••1 .1 - ..... . ...-- '; :.','..".'. .i -..,4 '.1, -'..9. Ag!i;.'VF,f,.-,,,,s;,,..4.,.5t..+.7.,..,,, ,.A, J. ...4.,,.,...../,f,ai,k,,,,;,11i,,;,,,I..,14 Cf.,P''1..,. .t.' '.‘ • . . .,• - %b ', .'-:.*:-'.;.'5'...1.'i',...;:,_.'i.f:'.-.1•40-t•!i.-.•,;1.',k-if',,,....';',,,".,,,Rie.1,49t-it`I., flP - ...1,,-;....,. . • . t • .;,.. „•:,,. .. f'.•;: ..,.•, ., .',' . ... . •, ..•',-,,•:.,•.:.:',,.,:--1..;,,,,..,,NeN,,,,iri'',,,,.1";1,.. il,tr... . . • II •.;,:F:?:11,1•''';•:' ' I • • . .. • . . , . . ,•,....;L,1,,'....,••'..-::,•;','...,.:C.,• ,".••:A•••P,d,,,i1:)...ifr4V`:;;.14',$'3•141.,‘LAth i&P.,4!,;,,, • .' ., .'..,'. t. -..,:.•.,••..,.......1;:ti';zif,: :,•F'0..,1,.;0,14+-t.1,•,!,e...,. ••••••t-1 ? '• - - . . ' • , • , •,,.. :•,.,• ..0.%.et :t,,,, V1,1I,D',14,:ifAi'.i'ti"fq,',.' ,,,f'; ..1'• ' 1 . ,, ., „ r , , • . ' ,i- ,. .:.",,r.:.''.'.1,‘.`:,'',.I .'1r t'0::i IA I '-'11.t;''.''.",..-,,l'''4,„1','1,'''":"';'''ri,af-1,; '• '...'ii,'.1.!;':' ....:,' • ? . • ' . • , ,,. . , . .. ':••• 4., ...1•-..,..o, 1,...4..‘''''.4 . .' • ' . ' ' ' • '‘.C'.''I•*C'''•'''II P . ' ''•,..;;',‘•l•:'.',,''C'• i'.. ' - . .. • , . • ' :.4:4.:1;•',..,'fr''.'"• I':C., ' " .:• ' •''; ., • ' . . :-.. . •.. .• •' • •• , '''. P' • ''."41 I'''.'•:;:',.;!;P1,;''. `"`:.'..i'!:,P.'4'....1.i"PP 1,'L'''P.'P C.). .1 ,:t';i:s i 4:, ',..•. . . ..' 1,.-...:- .,..;-;i. . „ • . . . • 1;L.f,''?t,:'•! ,'.1'.1•''''.. li.t::'-'•-,.'!,,i...1,,.';;:1-...*i'.':' ','i •..,..1'i P... 1. ''. . . S3U119IA •••••—— • . :••• ''..:., • . .,:•':. .,,,,.,:..,,,.....,,,f1::.`,',,,i ..:,1',.,"'i4:1!,,,41'''','. . ,, . ,• , r , r'.. ',.';-:'',' ';';',i . ',1:‘,.,.'"!.,Y.'.L:f:','','.'..;:,R;;'','e r''',;:..:r4:.: fH PZ1, ,!,'.1.:4..,..i.' • . . I ' ...J • ....i''..:."),'j!.....1.:..l::: ,,i'f.::,Vg.,..,'..,;4'.'::945'.';;Vtrt;',;,q . •.)'1 . . „ ...' ' .• 7 •,..•.: .':. ,'1',:.I''!“.... :I.?.6;.;,-;,...''•!,'.L;1'.1,.,...i r::•-3...t.,•4•:;,..i..,:,,*, • • •::•:.•' •g:o.r. ••Y.•::•:::;':‘,'.:!...4:1.-..1-1'4,•'('''',"t'..j.q'....•`;7:':::',1.'`4'14-;44)1:."''': .• i . ••• . . ,. " r•ir-•vi.,•.1,, s r ,..,,,, ..,,,...,r,r, , -. , • • , •:,,,••,:.•.:•:,•op;,.,J:,..,:ir.:4.,,,,,,,,,....;,,,,•,,,.Ji:..1.-;:,,k1.;.:1,:•:,:st:ri,'- , . • . , •.. ..• 'f''1'•:-',.11.'•:'CI. , •,.. . :•i'.:;grtitiilit?^: l' ,j . , • • . ...• ,•1: l• • • • . . .•,...-,- . . •.••.•-;',..-?;„:-,,..*;1:.A i•,,::.•%•,..(0,:t••',?..u '. , 1 iti ' . - ''-..''.•t• ',. '. . -.:..,--..!.:...t:.;:'i; ..-;;,fT,I•y 4110,,,.k1,;„,,;.1: ,..' ,, i--:,•,'..;.......::vivg,...,4.4..! • -"'..i.'''I. I.•.:.'•. ; .' . , • . •: ''.- .. , ' . .,-- -• ...'.•r. --,....1-.,,c •5-, V1.. •W . . . ' ':..'•,'-' '.'P.'-•'.:,';.`r,. :L`'..'.;r'-..,.11j,ig4;;;h,,,,,1 1-•.v.--.y.Yf 4 Y,', ., • • •" ''''' --'' ''-'4'•"••'',...,.,.:iir'..1',...":'-'.ili.:',W,-i• i.;: • '• • • . .. ".'1,:.."•?,',1,...•.:-....: .:;.r..; .:.;•• ., :•....': .. . , . . -, . - i . 1 • • - ...',..,j.!•):::?!;;', 1-''..i..::..'':''''... , ,:'f....'y,. iil.,!4.1, ,.t,tf., -, ,? ,:..,,, , •,,,,, ,.,„,,,,,,,,•)•1 •.,.,..1,,:,.:'V,A.4,,.,, .,•. , '•, .*::' i.i:.:".1.?,,,,•-..i,i,„,r,,,•:;,• •,•;:?.rp:,i••• ‘ ••". -:•1.. :r•0-:4;i•-••.:,:t.t.-• ,•r••..-,t.,,,,p,•Yivr''', I•- .'::.• 'P i'''' :. : ''.. ' ' ' :. '' ' . . " . t.. , -,,,•.:.,,;,•0Ei'', ,,;;;1',; •,;L,',...,!,-.1 ''.,..,. ..,•. , ...-., ... - ' .• • :,. ,'., ,';'-;.,,',''..1,'.,-.J!,4•..',...;4'.•'.•":"X i'...1••;',''.1 ',••:s45';'11A••1:'''.'. '1 1,',!:•:yi;.?',:„.11";r:(!L.h.•-•:!7_1;1;i::*'1:14-,!--1; 1•-•••*''Oj314i',6 ;14 '' • .'" "-- ' i'''.,::+i,[`t,!..,'i'sPr.V,7,11.41.,;.r,;•,I.,;,..!,,..4..;,,',:$0•1;'.-. .'•;;:i';','', j•,"'.''. .14. '' ..::. • : "'•. . • • . . • • ' ...•;••;-••''....,''...:-.::1;.'''i 'fi':•!';'•;:14:; ...';-41 ;RitiAcIf: .. • • • . :• ..'t( .''.••i.'. ,,'•V.,' i,..„-•••:•,'A-P.'0.;•,1:;,".1'..,,ifi',..,:??,1'.':Ii , • . . ..-.. : . .. . Ti,.••...,..-ii.,,...,, . . .. . . . . „..,.:-.. s,..,...,...*.,.w.4.,,,,•tqii:',,,,,,i,,,,,,..4,%B.,,,,,,_e•, ,-'.; • • . . . . . . . ., : . ..,.• __•• r,..",,„.;„.,.....,,,,,.:„,:.1;,,i,.,..,,...,,,4,..,,,,,,.,(4„,Th,r4.ei.r.?",1 ,-,',, . . ... . . . . . . • • • • • . ,.. c;,--•,,,'.; q.,•...,,I....',1ilf.'41icrelvI,V,Fr•fg,!'.. :i i'.• .. - . . ?..;!, .•-, ..1.0'fit•l'''•' ‘,01 rl'''V' '''' .i :. „ , ' . •• ',. . • • ' '-: '. . I ' ...{.2.1'.„";‘,,g'Vfl.,•-r.ii'''',0./ A'''''''y 11 . , . .1 . .i1'.'11)i, 1.,1 '.1',iTN ..:,..,. ...::'..::'..:•I i .:: ' • ' . . • . • • • . ,• .. . . . • • . '1 .':..."t.7.'f:.:':..... 3:1::1: ll•I'..1 '.4 '. ..' ' ' 4'.' ,,•• • ' .. , , • • •- '•11 It2 ;•./-f;f:i4,ti,:,.Zg114414fleka At ! •'i . ".... .. ''''.1'ic, •• . . • • ., -,i'; ,,..- ;',',..".,'..;::,,11''t,-. 44.,'••'! -F-'.74;i•08), ,--riiiik '''"' ' . ,. . .. •')',' ''-' - '''' 1- ' - ,,.- ''' • ' ' - : , ,•-..r••,,,.I.,;,.4.,-1,.••1:4,01141,44(;•4.1. ., .,. .,. ..„,... . . • • :- ,4-,‘,•,,t;7,-.,',,,,,- -.'•'•: .'' • '' ' • L,',•011 ,/ 17iii,-'..' ... • ...-..-',-,..- -,..1 P1 li ,•i '',...•. iiirt.4,47,.'.co:,..4Z-/.i';V.1:11;k'tptl, ,.. ....i• , • . 14 1 . , . • . ... ...,,,,,J, ..),i4,,,,,,,....r.,,, ,,;.: Af.......;,,,:lomerf !.1 . ,_ . ..• 1*.i'.;.' . • 'tr I.trjtiy` :. . • jrf 2i,1i a;ap LR' t,'` j car;irs. .' �:.I. 9f iN % c ? 1 'sl . :{i4 .• -.�� 71IN S ,I .SE Iti 1 `s[a,1.1 rL WI • Y i424 Gt., RI r •�_- -in I . G I'i;4•Iir ) p i.4p r y1/ s[alrwf^• f... vs� --__._._ -F- h��l 7l 7�9` y, -��� '�� �o ,, � p rT ��'�� �'� Ii -- -•--- ---— -- --- - let.• - g c13. g> w f ' sf w s ril v ; z° fr- �, C1 _ II [ v[ I r .1:: •�'•'{.' • i r 7,tN Si S.E. IOu I11$r ' C] lEI,y II g + -- b L -�..�.-_�._ _NIN sr 1 �� -, tL 1• �E LSO t_•r SIV '� Sr wi�' [ 111 T S r .N., -i_NE l "°�_. —Z_ 1L.' .rL .7C flIL :' 30 V1 n" rL . Iv tt ;Ally': "�- , , . �, • e,r :,. I. L �- p ° f IG.,IU_I S1 rl , ', .1 D01I Nf ;,:! .'iij u f4 I t `_f[_IT,Nn_}r y',�'hy`T: IK n . -1L,9{Vi ( `Imo Sr[: ly E40 xl v '•-,... `L', '' ,� ; .:,o��N1 _ tfa 1'_r_�st io,_nl__1r. t r gm .I - , fit: �__. _pv.Ir"n I•• ..I :[!•.`+,`- 0. • tr i{n, ", „.'} I -I[( Pp t Y 'f( �•"`7J•S "y -IF' N(A,) SC IOIIN fl �I,I,I .ti� p[lI I •[s�rN f� . ,•1 r..� sr F. �I„ mld_fL a -� ,sl-it\ sT • \`Z :o Q F I N,_fT 9 Il F ' r. -d : . • Mj• f1TFt --- L- - �3 '�':�r'El- !q ._� �..Fb.. .�M;u` .{�- ` , ❑ 'e '--- -' <st-I y.[gpyyA )SdI� "' no., • ° 'N[I.I,IN sr" 5E �~ o '- 'v"r it ' E It-. ,n '..._w,.1' N1 ian u. ,�; • -;, 'O\4I AQUA11 'r • ..,i. [7 - • f t' 1�" • I;IF' Ns frP NE InN`J Ir��c•°';irn ^1.. rW 1.I • _..._I ' �� I , y, p*:. I N2r r erNnl I.,r .s:,. I i^ y"ro d we nrNz°� � ''{{ _ 1..� .__ _ I5[3n7JN5f' t�, ', ,., ss�, �. 1, •^. / - � ill .t..a 1c I1- •btrvrn .. -.---se 1571 i 'ti a,, ,,, N[ MP tr • 6T I3 �r1111 •4tr.:-4 In ^.D� ..r.nw PL"'I I L-__'s1rN� sr !7 r N .• +` r ` "1'Io11N rL ,w,�r •a f.'� I Y 1 N a�- .rr Nr IITH �L C >•E' F itt •" T _yll u� r,r I I ^y • s1 II1r,1 rC.°L~�' iC•r-111iN fT .5' ; -� T J' /�A, ._ rilr.[ :;. C s r'H^l.• �1-101w �'LJ II N.••, .'.. 111 __-- '.o ,;,I1: C, !- '-t I. di ,Y t r` r • ;1 larN�N _:14. r17,1+.(;J iI It sc.in ' II • 31 .�5 , 7; rr.n.• .L/ i..__ - _11E_-- mi -71. '157s,ii....,,,0 t Jl SE 156r" • '13 1 �. tam tr �... :tI .,r-- Irc,_ "� - ,y*1 �[ ,.:I ::- -.__. rtrrN �----_---- ylo -f '�H�t,Ti yI 3 6„ 4P,t. I.I I ar-71 in el a Furl. ,11, j7({!' • r• (\ i ---4 > r "1r/-� �` ,811 8 191, ri n-' is"Cl 1n' F If �f7 a EC SITE ef• 1 ''I "n, v • / ` . " 1,1[i, ,� yn—r �ii 1I ini'['i.pP L I ,1f .1 r-r\ c N[SIH Hr Ilw ��{r ',{•t •:,�`' 'b./ �•'•� "�•�M '} a�I� d t - rt�l[i_n�f ; •31 ..- • .. c1 7(1 !l}`�� "`�] _�•p{`1r {!!�" 1l y�� jY� I,W„ II/ �.4.Lj} 51 5i �5' `Rill - i' y'1 �..(�` Cyr 3H�Fr`E IrH 1`? r_Ir-I1H� / C1I Nr:`„r SL 1 I `^'W�I M9�9r - 3:(nR .' J.•'T; A \V • 'y l "�f-I11�JPL �1 ?i T. •): ! • i •. • • • -r�' �i'42- ,TN':� -d.1 —.'1._. � Li - I ;-1 • I si iy.'" ji;il $I 14 ,• 1 . Wsr1rsrl!_5r .,. KI F rr y,I a I w • . I ~I 1 r �r'a: of I I• ' .'. I to• j p.xI_..P 9? I r .;.?? ;'; .. , •tillW I -{ `• .sl lurpgT._ /iS.,__ • '<IsuN� t•r�• 't' F'� ,„.,tj a raNc`n r /1 I r I rourlrr. r r yi I '41"I >;I S 1 �1 . ' c1.,, r ! : l.rtr1,T, I �s"L li I 1 a a 1 M11 sir v ♦ i I > t ,.'1—" AY/ _.... zl j1liH sr n 91 I ,. 'J 'I , ,_n.n 1 P, I.., 1 I O V _ I sr if y fl/, ° Il- d 1 z�1%1_�+1 r --;:�r I„ ts,rN -;{- > SE IJ6r"Si 3/ -,.: "".1,‘,45. 1 0�' tf 1)rw'/r I Jr tr:;1;,,;5 .\ 'Le. a I a[ t.": � �PArIK. _r:l_,p111rw rl tE i, r •1 ' d <�c Hp �r0. r <I , wYn r .:. Ll: • a �6 1 r `'�•5l IALN ILI ,�Sf 1: G.. +A t',1',: t,' ' • SM ' °, a�1! Te I S elf SE I.otN sT G s[ L, s[In,1 Pq > r"t L" b II VI 112 45.22 • t', G�.. '' • Y ' - r/\' :p., • - - . rl_" rV - d n [ l i t'+ I !! y��. . iI 117N PC I Q Lr .V'P° , 31 r [ �JS, .. •.l.. rh! \ Ma '$,TEI_T MR NE I �Y:1. St_TAT s4:"+-,.., ((( - r-_,,flq y Maplewood .- iE111Tx�� II�~ [ [ ly l ,..Pou. �Ti'N{'" AP I lr:. K:GO/(i d I '(4r:'`�-Ia r _ •• '' •. . Y . .4 4 75t i � ..i 'FT .s f. _ • • ,1' : ,.-., i SCALE IN MILES i ..• . I;' {I FIGURE te..P1,':,, .-?..I. SITE LOCATION MAP , , ',I :° • WINDSOR PLACE :f t waN1 =y;Pit,1191i-000 avcNO 2128 o F1OI1ZI97 MAIMS! DI AppRovEDCK Golder Associates __. . . • . • • • k . . .. - . . • . . ' . I 2 5' • 7 E... 14 0,1_42...„0:VII W:i.loi. •t .:r.,, , I i _ 4or 104 . -\.20 r,,,i ,..,,,,,, -':' .• . . . 3h (.4./65.,0.3.7%• ,:.1..;••,i .• ...,, • • : • Pp St---- • !• • I i - .a . . .. ea _... •• Oft , . . _ ' . • , . .• - .• - " 1_,L ' - - 7. .--"'• . z .... • 405 ,/,. ;HI °. 13 ... , ' / • '. ' V? Z1 c---• • ..._ -•• .... . , fr: A. &41] --..t., ,'--- , •.:' , . • ' ,..i.,. .: AL....,- ... ,. ,, . .., , . • , •• ,•. :a--', -•. •i --- i"; . .• • . • . ..6 . Vi 1.7.--; o "., TP-7 -..bft ...:?. T P-6 - --`t, . it ,........„T . s , .., • . 4 ---. - / .torc. it••••--.): ,uic:.,.. I • 1 I ,, i if. 1 .L`-!, - . .C.,..,j • .g - :71---•":7_, . k0 ° 'Li: . • : .. .11): '1I i:::•-1--... •.,;f•.-_0•i, •i:i :9 . :. .. ..: ::2 . • 114 ir • .. ... . .. . .. ..` . . • ' • • . Fr. I i! '17,1, , !.. 'rt. Cr' - , . •• • ' . 1 . .,. ......7 1 ,.• • .. ..._ . -I soi 1,' ••5' • .....%....-.... — : . t". _ ' • .)-•'11- . In I )--40-111 IMPLIRML_____-..eft —Jartra...._ r:-} On W.. it T P-8 ' , I ' • • .1 ' ' - ; a 6.0.1,•fr..-- i 'ink -.'. 't : - ' ..: ' - . .__..__,1 -, •• - , ' . . t ai r ee .711174"• •' ); • . • . N.r..s.m...., INC. . . ,5n.,2065,7.....s • .. -.,liL9RC....kS e_AY' TOY" . '4I IS'F?COHIT.3.6r.+1 1 . kl-'•'•' • is,,.00 _rr IL.r..5. ,.....f_" r,-:,-:: Y , C - 'r . , I .' ,:-)I.1 l . •. _ • rs) ,• .r, ,-, ni" 2'ly"le 316 1,5' . ...., ; I 4 4-0' ' - i ' . 1-fRi-d---. . .--(3-=_•-• 1----- • ".1-1-1"P%-- 1 I 1 . ..f.,___:-,1-14------------1414,.. I j H. •:-'' , 1,'}-.--r7 -.i).!::----:_,-s, - - —1__..n_i.. ,, V'. 1.2.5 . 1 _ . .y 4' -•-• ,,mi.,:, . V'/-,,,,, Fr.4og 0 • vv 4.1i•o"i seq 14 21'..."le...' • ' .a ,r1I.03.4., .. : IV'ele A ‘•3c - ol, 1/2 I t . . it 4 ; .• '- ..3. 41' 4 1111_ . • 1. lie a, I,' .S!4r", . •- Fr 01 o in I /7\••• . I 1 I .-- ,,t .,,,,"-. • . is e 1 ._. ;•• .. :$ II. I I Illitrii) ill . ' VI gip • I - 21 - , , Il ._„: 1 I 7" •. Fr 407 0 (1 ..:: I! 1 '1 i . t 7.' I ' •71 7. - • . ,.:. ..-V. '-'-1 44:; , • •:•...'.•4--tr.--.:11_.tgl'. - ",-... . 3 "tii . • .70 . ,- - •,7.:-_:=_-__..-:=-- -77-- 7- - • • 1 ' '-:::.:-T.---7._:-.----—"' s'.--. .___, . c., 1 t, . ,I ( •1 It-,-., . _i...111,•vtqt'lo ., ),,,. (••)-' 1_.:,/ .110 \ ../' f•. 74_011 I 11 . .- -i I V,' !..:.,.- `.41,S.z.5 . • • --- . 5, -0.....'••• C hu. ' . • ,..- 4..P.1...;. ..,. • .• • • • • - " . • . . . ... . • • 0 50 100 -- -I . . .. . . .• ' FIGURE 2 , . Scale in Feet " . . . ., . SITE EXPLORATION MAP . . • WINDSOR.PLACE . . .. • 1. . . Golder Associates . . • . . ... . - • • • i j..` { EXPLANATION ' TP-1-- - Approximate test pit locations ,: • and number ! tt' Inferred northern limit of fill .Y based on explorations (actual li, . conditions may be different). .e. .. - Approximate stream �-'' PP location I } I Cross Section • T `; A -A' . ; Road l.m banks ent ,4.• Yyyj{ • ; -JE CouFt •M. ' 'i •�K.-:11 ..I'n-(t, I'o S'•C7II 91v11 COovRC S7h1./+WLaYwpLLAS , n N --1 S t7Ev�LK O. •' ' 'r— It-(of Ab47onl ST OS, �_ No. 2'11'' 6:M.c,' _ i.M ' - ). q 111 _ „ f/l, I rr o7s y le I/ : a f r" �1 'I .13 ..� I Fr.sae I I ,)-,• h- I f f �.' - = 1 [4-) . :fir` - - if -O l - c-jilTrtA I: .. !--14 J: •';‘. , 1 I °k y Il -r /Jr • t 1 t o r r . • , i 6 a 1 .f.dric )1 • . 1 \;'-s;.:':.._.-:i')n f.-...;,L I A.I. ' 1_,"., C,. if;' i 11 1-7 I rrr•tcw t-{s r �' 1 �� I '; "'() ,I, e sb ` t _I :r- y Y P-2 „±"_`f_'eee����{itt 4:44 s 4V 6 :l • y� `\ \ 0 .. i 1-�v, R^ ' 3_ ,r 1• N to J ■ N ,r� - 4 ,d.:. ___ o I— �1. .5; -j ° TP-�3 . 1 A I II I , �rl��� I inN. ` __ 121-0 ... '._l9 ! — i I10-O� ` fll nl.�. { �—:a' .K Ilol On �' • ! ' oras ' -'22I W'b2 pear�0 RdeO ' .. 90 SL -W �.Srt-+t�1T -761 R/I vf2'1L'vieoI -r t! TeRMSi Cownitio,,S,plot- To TNR cir{of a.owrew f j •'' t, r ..INA.zt' AS of ,2/1a/P) , 0Note: ','"'',' • ' Base map;The Leitze Architects r Site Plan revised dat• e October 1987 ' ' ' '" stk fll/11'1198-000 • DWD.NO 2099 OAR 10/12/8 7 DRAWN d; $� APPROVED CK ' ---i,-„. i-•.•• '''';-:c.--;•••' - .-:.t.„.f,-..:,-- .,f-4.,,,,-,- f,,,.......,,,-Tr-zt;.!..!.., ,,- ---.:00A0,#,-.7--,,--5,!.....",;,-,1..-,•10!..!,,,,,,- 47--...1...rt,---- ----'•'- .3 ---.--bl_.,_pwr --Apprit - -,*mpr -Arm -, _ - . - . i i f . I. .• „ r- rk 4.44g.ge ,or * 1 . ' 1 • f.: 'A ..,i. : :, . .,, ::.' ._ ; 4- . : : - 7-4tilioliOrr•*--inFa-k4F!*.ierrato..i.v.r.urtetv _k.mgasostintr t t ! I' i.. t i 11*, . . 4 ,, •:•"...4'..-- ---‘1ki--.*:-../••--- ----,--_-_,•**4* ; : • 0• : “ : I Inni - i 1 -1--- - t 4N74-4-'41-•*-i--444-4, -4*--"b-.......-........-- ***„......„,,,,.._„,,,,,. . , : . or 80 ig A 1 i • 't. ' I i , i.ifiic , i , ; : , • 18 1e •I i i 1 1 i i ' 4 • , . , , 1 I I • ! Is. : : ! • 1 I i i ! f 1 ?n; !I 1 1 iI fir,: ....., ..$4 I ii , •,..i., 1 Iiil i t t i;i:i i 1 i I ! I a) 70 t',;. - i cm. i 'it i I i . ' 1 1: • ! Jilt 1 l I 0 1 j I I II I. 1- .5 1 ,..., , III , ; ._ ,Ii 1 1 ,1 CJ1 . Crl 60 i • ClI 1 I I id 1 1 I 1 I i ._ i h 1, . 1 i.,..{. , ,, : , ,. , i f i i . --.., 11 1 I I 1 II • ,11/4 I I III- I I I I i 50 il ii M L. III I 1 II k.; I i ..,, I 1 i I I I IIIIIIIII ' - 1113111M111111111111111111111111 , 111111111111111 _.. ,40 Q. : I . LL .111=111 11 I:I I '' t I I 1 II . I I I I I- ' III I ,. I ' CT . ' II --' . . CD I II . I i I I I \ I ' . I I II 1 ! i . .1.4 1 I i I : 0 N 11 2 '30 1 II 1 II III x -a m (a- al 1 I. , :1 - • 11111111111111.111 I i • IIIHINI— MEM • 0 '' 20 01 I. 1 ii I li ,,,‘ Ill= 1 I ; 11111111111111111111.11Millill= 1 •,-' CD I i i!I I 11 il 1=11111111Miral I I I 1 ! • i ' ' t i 33 LI iii I l!, l I 1_ li 10 -‘7.c Ca . i i t; , li 1 1 I I 1 !II 1 I HI 1 I I I ' 1 -I 11 iII I I i, 1 , I III I II I I 1 I 11 I 1 I I I H I I I I . 5 . = 1 GO - 1 0 • 1.0 - 0.1 " 0.0 1 0.001 co Z * Grain Size in millimeters Cobbles! Coar S:2;ravel Fine i _ Sand " . Fines Coarse Medium 1 Fine Silt or Clay . . . • C) : - , o , Boring No. 1 E!ev. or Depth Wn W L W P IP 1 Description or Classification — . Co. - • . -. it) . • . , , .• Sandy Gravel .S . • TP-1 #1 2ft - 2.5ft N.A. - g - : . - -•-• TP-4 #1 1 ft - 4:5ft " . N .. . • s• Silty Sand- •. • • ,4V • cn- . • . , . . - . . . . • • _ . . . • - - :%.:�.�,.x�i.� g;.^eA..,:-sera-r...-.,;rr-•r}�a-Yc..� �... r-3er..,:.," - _ - _ � - - !f^�r".-aT:�^N�?zT,a �"++e_'-';= , :‘e+.-�,•.a1 - _ rsE ,34 - _ ,k e"r Q9 I p- .,,i _ i of Proposed Rod I. OP* I 405— I I .'•— Steel Guard Rail • A El. 403 l Fill: compacted clean sand and gravel 400. . • I Ecology Block (2'x2'x3')Elevation In Feet Above 12' i Sea Level ' 6'------2- • I Blocks Inclined 395 i i at 6° From I I I Vertical i Ecology Block (2'x2'x6' ) I ; 1' min. 111111111,iiiiiiir Existing Ground Surface 390:I 6° , - • • • • • . FIGURE 4 SECTION A-A' ECOLOGY BLOCK DESIGN- 12 FT. HIGH - - WINDSOR PLACE PROJECT NO 873-1198-000 O WrTNn 2097 DATE 10/12/87 DRAWN S L APPROVED CK . Golder Associates -- — _ .._ _ -,-:,-- -,--- •••-- ----'' -- --- ,' -'" --'-•,_ ::::. '-': :;•-:=1,'.- - ' :-.-1- .: '''':: :247 - -- ----.4.- *-:',... ''..-41 , -:-.'-',''',4-'F . :,i€7. .,t.1: :-,-...,:,.;-: , ,,4_-.,4,4,,,,f,•;. •=iFf -..-.,-.•-• •-•;k-wpor. lfrecto-..-••,0100 ,-:,-'*7-*‘; . . . .__.- ... , , !--,--aran,..,•,'",%;:-..4-kc .;;.1"----'r:AFtr .7Z-76r. ;',. -:-,4,;-;,..,-:--z,: -5.±fik.-.- -,:-.-4-,:::::: -_ _,-... :;- ;;;; ,,w..?-, -y_,...-;-; -*._.,.- : ,,,11,.:. -, _‘f,-,7-px:..,::::1- fii.Y64:.---5Fixs-iit.,.---..i.: -441-AWkski:Vag-51;,..9.4.1o#fvotv . '. . _. . t : • . . Property ' . . Line - . . , • I " CL of Proposed Road 410—- I - I • c z • I Ecology Block (21x2'x31)-------__ :....., , I - Elevation In El. c 405.5 Feet Above 405 Ar, Fill: Compacted, clean sand and gravel Sea Level I 1.1 . - . , • , Blocks Inclined I 61 at 6° From i ,. I Vortic7.1------1 : — ' surfaCe 'GrOUnd Exi sting 400 I • . i. .1. min.--4 6' • 7 . Ecology Block (2'x2'x6') 6° Scale: 1" = 5' .. . - . • • • • FIGURE 5 SECTION 13-_BY • _ . - ECOLOGY BLOCK DESIGN - 6 FT. -HIGH , . WINDSOR PLACE • PR , . 1:).,EciNo 873-1198-000 2098 ,,::-TE 10/12/87 opAwN SL APPROVED MC - Golder Associates . .