Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA00-124 0 25 50 10D p:; r: PRELIM! •i RY SITE IMPROVEMENT PL J-- __-_ ,--,,-,',_ _ -- - ,- 507. • EDGE°F -..."- Et / _ i _ ". 12 c— ra '"\ n L-n5: .�_ci i_=_i�_� 10 "'. �`1� -- I �OCJ (9DeaN RD) c/ - =' �� - - . -° �• � _ = �_ �_ ___�y%_LINE EASELIENt — _- o es 5C REC.NO 98121]195 �_ If s _—riZ+� �� • �""'=t/ / yi■ -�_ ���i h — X i. / / di H-I3 'q' _ o i \"-/t,��14 a � \ '\�ayia�'ni�i � •<� W N* ._____. \- --_. ,_3' 512.7, .1, .1 C C CD '`'' c E w /OL _�uY-'� t ./',�I ,•'/ W sEE NOTE 1 1'^�, �I,�.11N x \\ N.A r ...,. • r S I11 G -.--- \-- t`y�;� + REG NO 90121 1•5 / /, ---------- ,- REVISE \ ' J IIrr(( I • ' A I ,\\� d --1 l\\ b �9G �+. . it; V,��:$1. I \\. \ � ,','�,Yi'(.tll�' 19812171951- , \\�mil... I..6 4.-- c "/ i 5 +�Vy t—'"es♦ 3f LDmwG I 1 � k' A \• t ' R'x,a�a9)npa i `E • t—���\\� a iurur a �► ' \ uuuu .`'.� �� r-.!FumNG 41� I• s \\\\\\\\ uuur.................... rnuruurn '=� p ° . `pn�;.. GUR RD I-� a \. _ a`\\\\\11\�I I4 I rr n rr r „co ® ' .� "� '��r .. \. '14V• ' �I ' '; hi , i • F .2-.E � \ , ' \'" ' BUILDING A 4 e `7 or �'' . . Y ,$. i,:: A FLOORS O 36,300 GSF I'!t '/ r7<z n6 9r \\\\l+ ,a5.200 G5F I✓ \ �', . ��- i� , /' p . EJ al •,`l`k ) PERIMETER I / / '`� ' , 1'S yl \'\ Sf�i' .' \ ��j, s..! '�. �", J H I� \ 1 ' '� u°tNc°E"u°w+ F REI ],OSzo.. C� cow W ,.. Cr D QR=]5].00'0 p = .!AVID >�1 ✓.�• , ® GUTIFA.' Z W N e '•� ots re \4 `` O' '�'%'�!Tc•' ii^! �� l',�A '1 1\I w. / /.- / ,%,:. J • J 2,'z. �pf ' W s 30',ar ��YF-E .D,4r'', -1 I / r D/ .:'` s°5:o,. ' t7 / `� m/ i/ • O Si m 1 //I ./•%' ,`w$ rl• Ill 11' / \ Qa /� /, oLW f/ a oRx' I oos"NG • ,, / 1 1 - 5�§y ^i.S ''/ '� .] �/ wmrtc owW¢" z�y I ,"R ' BUI GAB f �/' l R o — O�'o I 1 a \ , M/11sz9 3G6 C.SF�- / / a.i,' I \`• �I'L�' Q ilk a• 6/ \ / `P:roaonl 1 .��i�jj - �, f.� /� .-? 111111- ..� w �r"r Ic �'� O Y. T n. � ��i�i�i i���' /// • 1 1111 11 E. /�f ,z \•:1' n /.—t �J�i� t ' us�Ei'.........vi—.111- vr+�is �,Ray.! z� ^ '���-rt-Y .,r'''/,': gi • '�ixL'l • i 8�^0c_ - �� .• `.......� o -VVV �•�:'' =I�;�U~:%' > i-`j € � �_ BUILDING C 6,000 CSF -4 PROPOS-, �115¢ iL��.�i 9'x le•s QwTM ` _ s 1 '�9 !''Fsr: ,, `_� ) ;PROPOSED WATER �' 4 Y, ' --------- -'- ' ACCESS / / • 1 ' w w <o -osuD6 mPa W -+. --- „ N Y ^3 u EnSTW�f -217.82 —=— ® `—BL I 1 `��Q--r/ /, • I //\�,'' m w a LEGEND Aw0 GU F - c �— I N''�, CONCRETE PAVEMENT / / SRE DATA,_____ �� 4°�I°-..'/ �_--' \7 �� / / / / ir— I 'PY°`�a5ry`.�m 1441,0....,1�• j --- �� / �C / ////'�-�S r PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER ye- '�_ /_ •••pIBRNC CURB AND GUTTER __-� /+;/ / PROPOsm BUMINGS/SI11,:22, �. '. g$ � � - / l <F28snEPROPOSED RETAINING WALL ® / /, BUMWC& ICU- ; ' OC IB•.- l I �` C SIt0.oalpVSLOPES EOWL TO OR \� 0111IDING HDGM: 0 FRONTe3 .z$`_.�_A�r` (a SJr r yi BUILDING C: ALOWm: fE1:TT _ .(,H PROPOSED YONUNEM ONAL EH b ` .5 - ` � /Z 5GN 8 a CO 6 M GREATER 1WW,OS .f+;• TOTAL 296,a00 SF -A PROPOSE4 53 FEEr _� .-F taP OF sox SLOPE-31,603 SF /,, '•BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED SEE PLPN F @ 8' / 1 ExaIRES of-0]-01 ,R INTERIOR(UBC ONLY) ...... L-6-�':-+1 ,\ 10'FROM GRADY WAY \ ,, PARKING rNDVY�Is: . • CITY OF RENTON REQUIRED:�LpB{Tma.sruls 1. DRIVE ASSES ARE Y ADM NI AI S 10'FROM BEN ROAD �ITTADA S7yyS ' OEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS ;/ BUILDING SETBACKS PROPOSED 25N'FROM BENSON RAT(E.PL)TO MICRO A PROVIDE_: 605 SIPNf, j/ �� 'd6 ,, 00 FROM N.PL TO BUILDING C 4 I63'FROM TAIBOT ROAD R/W TO BULDINC B M80 COMPACT\ 135'FROM CRPDY WAY R/YI i0 BUILDING B 1`1 A OA. \ __ F. - w� �� IX.CROSSWAKS \ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE MG EMOWC um*. 4i6,J00 SF STALL.SIZE:9'a 16., (STANDARD Sc LOADWO) ]/26/W C mu sae 0'/'x 16'(COMPACT) \ PROPOSED: 6E4000 SF _ LANDSCAPE AREA i OF LOT COVERAGE(BURDWC AREA)-llx °.,e..m1, -— r�BF •,� ._RWD Z0- 00R '' 39.600 SF(N1021OR) / n SHEET s 4 c,..P:\a0°Eyo1\]]25\Prweninor4V725-PP B1,9 Dale/Tune.09/11/2000 01331 Scot:1.50 Potri a IVele E77251.0,2]]2SPT.2]]25PS. fir:, _ souT F,..:1;V7 i8<:EL'^3 �� �!.a•: � :: � � • '..w+';�• � `�. .�o�"£�` ',rip'% >�j H r J f• f % • :Y4 #�,� �, .. � :L ::. .: .,.. . r,' r j ( .� `� `""fir ,' .. G • Ks-,-,..y is ?,/'.. . } �� �• jj q. ./Nr* . . �. # .... .:. .:ya.. ,.� .. 2R+:}�, • .. ..� ,.to .� �"� � ...;,;:� :'T: -iry N .i� 3a € 7 - 1 a :0, u } a�j £E�'� � �-< r �^x�x„t•�� � � j ,,,v� a10 tv..��� wt».,. . .. _ .&tc � +,,;} } €�(s ao v :: w, ter, ! g `tjyy" , t ,yw N. t -:`.T.-,'- >' .:. € ..,$ "`�y i -�,;;3 ,.. :.;. ; £.4€-C?` "�f;R: ': ,s .,`.'i € /- r pi..ANT S:.E•E3 Lr.... A�dL +arj1Yg"may - wtmwiF1Ml� H� �1 '� �yp 1 � ...... . ......,.:.„ . ....::.,......,,, „,......._..„,n, 1,,,..1•,::',.!! S" % Yy 'E>' P Y 5:[:. z�9 . aw ..t'. .i' :i> f< �j 3t. ..R e. .... ... , ,.... ... # :.. .E.a.:� s r. .... n E� -«a.... :.... <.$'"l�'� „r<'y'�i � :....v....«<mu..r.:.. .. s .x .,...' �.�,,�v ..,�3... ,r,,...,...,;a,-. .,,..< 1L'z...,.;. _ �#w; f., z , 1� •a' 0,! _ :'7 ;V'gip. ' ._ w. I. .a a� 'E:} >, Y £ • ,f ..<. '.<��, f •'...} <;s,�.. ., 'A.'�+' ��F, ,<N'�' >r,�s �i•S, .3 �'iV- E .ff .- ?. � �'�: s� >. �D::• # :}.•LIE' 'I� `/. � i .. r.., :,.,.,.... _,... . . :,_. .r • f . .,.br ......., .. �.::'',^¢>w. .... ....... �:, .. . ... . . .'� ...�, 8. • ., ��gay • , ' '' ���Ac;:s,`ss� �� ��n"��"" €��`".as � ` 'f�.�ice^` "'ae�ul4 ��`, iA�` • i„ ..a a,rF... ..� y , .. v' :d n'' '$ '" 3 n :- > .<sw3a€y„ n. '�, f <,,. .>w::;.- -,W,:,-4 £ 9 •yg1 k Ra ' {7" -`f T ^yx Iraggi Y $y7 k' i ,..+ a x r.r. $e.,e. '�2$3z £ ai £ � } ��_.< •: F i € '.r £ S � .' - w., c� T^, .y3n,.�-.a.. 5 s• < u � t. fio�3a� } /,# F� � iG"Y :�#� ..x ,c ^ I ,iiipfio a� ' q .p <• ;:wig an,u-..,.c�.,. ���Y�++' • l w,....s.''„3:inw.}:.Ciry n. :rw......r.nbvaa. • i-' . O/gC_.,1�`. 0' �'• `\ .1•;`� ,, 4, r���, i {_v 0v.6� •`y ` i# . 0 �• �..A7.a.k..,, '''' /e. ® , j B . v /1 OPUS® ct, j?0,45,,,,p .�`�' �i °� \�� ,fN �1 f�_ \P sr ; •� .� , v. � s �'� S th ointe 4. . <,, 14 4.��� 4 \ � ?j1I'M � � �:r .'� q� * .� �4.. .1Z* It*i, Corporate Center Uq�� ��4 tic, ,� �, �. Ck �. , fi!!® ;y ampp , • ,A;„4> V/� •��/ ,4)4 ► c T rolr or �y �_ �, o �'4,>,, f , S r�� (G. ,e� .0 et ( Renton, WA 1 o , a4 �; / � + ,� w ®j�> 4014,,� ® � e�� .. �I August 3, 2000 RN z • a , v•im` �� •N � � 4 " 'S� ., .i' 40 . ) R� ._?. epos '., - — 4'..e/ 4• ?4, ' . .2 71-Ti�, !9' . ,.. 411 i 9 "*.4,- * fe• ,,filli,e Aisoli ._ -: 1 70'1t G'Q.QQ o f wAY ` ��<,�, •4xrSPT it' f f ® i • `. _ _ .,t, 4: - .- - %'V, 414 /4•k`,.4., 'it ' /0 ///! _ 1 IIIII ---�j' .s� •�• •'�• j�,3�� , • ® 1, ks' I - ! , 0, '�` RAD WAY �- ��. ` , I /y,. !/ !/" ! \ z o • Sr�rc S(;,VeROUTf 5/5_�$_!7i _ - �! / '/ �Reoe1jet` - _ n; ,i� -. tr' Ewa ernv�e A ��•` 42. 4,4 ., ' /' / // '', •: ., . : ,...4 4 :,....C: , Aiii.:&> ...*. ' # ‘N* ;4 '• - \,„ . ``,` • '�,•r w e.vc ins ��4 ��C•-ji. �• • ., •6'4. AQ' `' •� y \ . ... ,s4, -- -- ' -1 * c-5)..i.,>\ ,-„,., ,•1 'b 4, • N.,y W' a Q /YF t •5 y'e t � i 4,.... • -t 2 IC / % 92 `` ' `\ % ,yam` s / `4 ' \.f`\' e,`c09 •n is `; j A.,::: .,-.. �� RO' 161111°` cue', ` .'# e 00 \ .-_..... - 4S a\:, .4fr, . „ • ' ' 'lie< . • -_ „..•••'' 6 :::',.- •:-A:...... 4 ... - -.. - • .1- l`# . •,,.,..,,,,, 4 g 4 ..41110k6'.C9'. - ---- =ti ```�°= .. ' / of ,1,,,,,: • ,- - N. •�* ® �/ �-�.� 5 \�°-_U r �P � • ti � ' � IMIT ' ' /` So .� ��.'` Off, $ /. ` y i ,,,., • ,,, o f `% ;� _ ' $11\ f, iAr•tt 'B¢\stso ��jj� ► <4 •, ' ,' � /aof N71\. ,:s .. 1. , , .,, ,...:, /.4ft,_!. 1 -.- \ ..1�' ,>I - - _•-` `„ ' t-:• ,`I,,,v.,„ �0 7 ta\ Eq0//13 / lIt. Al' ... •. �Y•.` ~. /% ;9� •+ 0+ ,F,\ 1,Q•' r goo. Ij �• ! 1 '� �c l /,.. �_ _ t'.--- mo i rt 4 T �� itk •:?�\ i�R. A \ �� - - �Pr- �� O Aso • ti s /t•. i, �i ••• << - enm\tZ-•-k�/ z y s l Ya '�ir�® • �N yq v�GA.� ' J4 �/ ,//;��1<��'' {j u �`„" 0 2 o9c'41 •Cyr �� i r ef 4 '\ .� O •- / / ,4 9iB a� Ej f1 /ior—= ` 9 tip i J�` `� �: �3 Z // /_L: It a / 7� // �p� r. \ ` e• & Yam/ ,+ ;.• ' 4 �pvj cn / Iae '~ 4 Us®cam 40. • !`:� ' �\ } 4, iv y\'k \ , �, ` �, . .` \v��. 1_ _ � ' o / / s. U TRY I ;`guy .�� � �: ` ®b _ \Q� :IP . 0 150 300 600 /1 OPUS® A Development of Opus Northwest LLC L Vicinity Map A OPUS, Southpointe Corporate Center Renton, WA September 6, 2000 _ ---- — _ -__ 7 - - - -- ____ - ---_ - - z --T_- -- ,- - _- - -, / = Office Space T a -' LOBBY 1 ( = Corridors / Lobby } 30' 1- < ELEVATORS- I = Restrooms i I I I = Stairs / Elevators STAIR - STAIR - - - - �- - I- ---- ------ _..._ ----t_------- ---------f_------- STAIR-- = Mech I Elec / Janitor o Z OFFICE N OFFICE N SPACE Z SPACE R Z --ELEC/MECH } WOMEN'S �CL � I�� MEWS' JANITOR ELECT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR F- - - J"-- - - - I- - I- --- - - I - - - 1-- - - - � - - -----I 300' N.T.S. i , SPACE I ( I I I I 302' / N.T.S. / vo ��Q ,�21444 o 0 I 8 O a I = 0 15 30 60 0 OPUS® A Development of Opus Northwest LLC r Typical First Floor Plan A OPUS© Southpointe Corporate Center Renton, WA September 6, 2000 = Office Space "LOBBY 1 BELOW = Corridors / Lobby b a: 30' rTy P 1 ELEVATORS I I 1i 1 = Restrooms 1 STAIR I I I = Stairs / Elevators CORRIDOR �_ ' CORRIDOR _ :----- ---+------ - --- ---- +--_ -- --- - — - ----- -__-i--,.: _ -_ _1___ --- = Mech / Elec / Janitor , !oil.- r - - .,isj= Uj d Z OFFICE In I o Z OFFICE ( ELEC/MECH ' SPACE ��I 1 — SPACE ELEC In Di l I- I WOMEN'S- MEN'S� JANITOR 1 :-- -J STAIR -------I--- - I— j- I- I- '- - - I- - - ___--1 - I I I I 300' N.T.S. li a II 1 SPACE I I 1 1 ' 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 302' / / N.T.S. DENq_Cf,M FNp%1p1J MANNING SEP A 2 2000 RECEWED 0 15 30 60 /I OPUS® A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Typical Second Floor Plan 1 _ i i SO """"�MR ,"" - . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON •,.,- -- aN RENTON u _1__ V V" �.�.., I IMI Planning/Buildi 9/P brit We k Dept. TREE CUTTING / LAND li NO. REVISION BY GATE I APPR r^^° - •' ` Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator CLEARING"PLAN 3 �• 0D •"\. .I ti� \`\ /'-- 7- o� ' ',.''..Y/1,-C\ 4#\s '''' ''` :7 135) .0,----- s \ I it Lii-)K \::-..::.::;.>\\\''''k', ' ...-'2 r.,(,°,/ ..,.,------ ,IA ,k '")\\.ii: : I. ll \ ,.'"7-'•,: .- ,.;•11),i ...'..''''' '-'2" , N \ ' N 0,457\7,, \\.,,.. ! Iii 11 1I,11,_ ,, C.,,_,:l'i,',T;,:'< :,:s-,,,,.\-±_.1,,:`,.,._'''''';r7-.46''') \\Ii‘A, \I \$. 1''.\\\ \. \\I'\''''.7\§‘ Eg 1 1r.,' „\r f III' ! �o \\.� —/� ( `\ / /a �_-=I I I/ \ 0, - 1 2 / i I/ 1 fryi� r ,..„ .... .,, , " ,,.„ , , „,. —„,.,• s \./ •.), \ _ _ _ 1 , , Ii • ,, • 1 // ..,--- , _ . re \\\\7_--r 1-1,4::-: / i \''' , \ \ ''''.1.S', \\ \ Jielfrilif t,C .1 *° i , ' 40'-' \A-''' > /jyy{GJ s111U1Z / t \` 3'`\\� 0. ;i il./ I .4�[( ,, \ \.-- >\; -A \\ � yF I \ \ .`�_sr,, lam\ \ I I 1 ri ` / ll au:,I m \, ' _ / I 11W / l \ :... g i.�.. \ \\ I�\n:a,'�\,�o 1 '447 f \\- -.,,,.:._..,,.... ::...:.\-:--1'••:.•!-•,7 ' .,':'', ...: 2 ,,,f-'rr.',,,•'„ \ t ,,1\ANV 'N \\ _— • --adz• :. .,i:'�-, \'', ' "y � du f / � 'w i ; m ° i// /�' NN o� ( ' /V:',V ' .b ' '4'4144b-1,4-:4W.t,4/4: '-'''''' #:#0‘ %<.''' '' 1/7/1(iN I ' / / '•,...,„", -,,k. ..<;:"./. 1 N ,,,,!..,„ it \,,, I 7 .0.IN...„‘gits -'"'I-- ,-. V aZ' \ \ \ , 4 - , 1 I411 Ir a ! ` j/ t\ •a sa \Na �t \ \-- ` ' _ s vm m H,q FOR: TITLE CZ PQ•G �0 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH g KENT,WA 98032 OPUS NORTHWEST,LLC OPUS SOUTHPOINTE 4,1 L �`,d Z (425)251-8782 915118TH AVE SE,N300 _ (425)251-8782 FAX S.W.GRADY WAY e w BELLEVUE,WA 98005 c c c c CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PUNNING. RENTON,WASHINGTON all '.,Ncc,.oHE' SURVEYING.ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (425)453-4400 ....� ,.....,.. TAG ,m,b»a 0.. — ---- ------ ------- -- ay.n --- ... 50 ....,.. "'''" „r_ri CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON — - - \ RENTON .. o �' _ _ Plannin99/B1"i' 'Public Works oeot. NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR �•- - w„ m•-` Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,AEministrator PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN �'^ Z"a 3 IMcP ----- . I 'I I �. \ 2� -33 :,,,, .\\X k e.<"j --n I /- _ ^,'` :! I Jam,` .,'' I \ - \���\\ .Ey o , y \ �tl :3 \ s= %T -- L!j ;� 1\'>)\\%j\'\� 1. ' ,T4\�\ I li I I ''' \\ \-.,ao /J, ,11--. -- I—Il — ', ///�;q/I Ir \„,‘. \ 92 ~ ' �d / !,-i` % _r— _ - ,= J\S\\\1 I:l: . ( //(1'rt 1 \' m m � g� g��$ 888 �`\ • III .( - , 4_ i ~�- — Q�`- � / /� I 1� '/ `11:. ` \ B o 2 0 2 S � � � � �� i: '1�.'��I I' +v -�, o''m -l1 � _ - / ,/(l ��J. (a�\��,' \'1 .'���\ e e ;8 1 1 1 1 f.. —` ------ - _ Ilk«\\? :., rnt, �:T. \ $g� '�� €� � 1 a�; r �F —l�/ � _ — ?ll f(I�\ �( i7��i/�y �a�l{�\ 1` IIII h z.\ i ' mil —'= — 4 �,/ / \ 1 I '\'''. 1 - g1 'g $ g _ I I. o ,o _ a .,;—_ '�E .— _ ; "i�y�yI�I 3/// 1 1."I. I\� 11 —p ./ ' \ 4ax •Y/ _ { lv - ' II I '. _/ — .`` \.' .i r �E ; __I- I • ' '' 111E \`_— ����� i F s m ,>1 IM r�. *I'-.._'-' _ III ,,,,5.., 3 •°•� 'R6 += n, , a -4/ 1 ,,SA e 4 fD a l<j1— ICE II ,I,. \ �kF as �_i l �I"” V 'C) ti gasa 60 I ` _ !�\ };2: '•! .`� .t irr I� D �€ . i• _ !Y >,�/I ; ..a I__ 1 II\9 III�1111(, I tl I I Iii i i :/ / illyA vr,0 .7— ? .ii---.k\ • F l' / 0' 11 'Ir I,vt_�$ / 416> i �i. \-:C _— ■ —`\\_ Ir�i ' III 11.� I \ I • n FL_ ! r. % ems ��• -1' _ 'Ill 111 11 �11 �j . , .......\:<:_i_t__. e....lik,\:-#10\\\I\.\t"..\-1.J.1 1))A .i n ,T,q I' •\\''\ \� r\. �/.!r,aT /� . , \ \ (11)1,r / /Ill 'p I I I d °;.;:( / IL. (( i Ade L I.1.---\--171"."-- ,( ......... .,. ,„„,.. ----;- - I Id I V \ / � lit ° I/1111i11/ r , llI �m / ` ''� . % . �{. " l , 11111I1II01� 1 .` r • ► I I1II/J 7 Wa „ " • , " —e .:) 0{ 11 I I1�y19, - , ����It �• / „' .� ► ��' "A?s1 � 11///)l\/ \\1l\\16 -,' •=.- .y. �1aU111 i — awa,_, / /l//ll/l/l//l///l/////)/ 1)l\I - --_ �2 ;7.-.71:L.1\/!:517:7'\'6::,::::-‘171:''.1_' r. `�/� \//////////\// IIt �1,��� �,9. � \' \ \.,:,,,..,,,,‘,.,44,,:44--- 1:___, \ • ? l \ \� jO MAT 6yr� s • 1,_,..,-----.ER iti! \ � ) l l, 1 ,% . \\� lil : E' EE '`' \ ',' /\./,% o \ I1 111�Ilu llo \ ;\ P • \j/ I� �lll lllllm . , �D o � \ %/ 1;e r 4� I�IIl�I (Milo „ - ''\< % ' / \A\ \ IIIIIIII 1, o • \\ \ ' t —— \l,11 II I I I.g Ik 0 ` a MA Hur %m FOR TITLE p z �GHAfiS 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN ° CO 0 KENr WA 98032 OPUS NORTHWEST,LLC 0 _0"4n, Z. (a25jzsT-szz2 915 118TH AVE SE,*300 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE Rt (425)251-8782 FAX S.W.GRADY WAY cc 11 co % CML ENGINEERING.LONG PUNNING, BELLEVUE,WA 98005 RENTON,WASHINGTON IA II -,,"CHOIR" SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (425)453-4400 •a, 1-1.1-{— .1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY P_ LAN \',•, q. IX., a NG 50• EA .1 4_____.4-----ti:\___ \sA_\,\. 4T- :4-T- ._--------,-, :oc -17.\______. ..___,.cl\ ____,______ __ POW i •••— —__----_ ._ .. \ —. \ \ \ ( _ Q uNE EASEuurt ® y J Z ,c(�s P REC.NO 98121]t95U ' .••' n------�,-,pi /`"<� !: �_=_ 'tails_ _ {� t \ `,�vg pc� �\ ,••t t.__'__._`• O QQ \\`N / ". ,b.�u,� ,. \ \\ .moron$0•POWER\ . \1' - O Z Z Y ' �Y -� IX SW • ¢4bT`' �ti \\ LINE oEMEM �, _ -I a- >Q=SEWER AIH •pEG 98121]1951 • \ \ E ). r — z / jam/ A\\ ( 4 / . \ , -;>"<'-) , ¢o w o z j / / 4Iiiiii� .• _Pbl 0 \ l. \ \\ urviNFask%°!IENi�j I r�1rn1" ,i' I ' PI -tr '1/ \ REC.NO 98121719 8 ' P"ER '• \\� , p• V/ dl"----"""". D EC I \PROSED It ' �'\ FISEMENf /1\ fix\ , F ir kst 7 • \ RE ngw,. 1 I I I REC.NO ,A, /% y I E%IAIN 10'YN f x "mum '''' ,' J ' �\ \ \ is 0�" I >A l (I < ,�,, 4 = ,tea 11______►_•___ I \ \ '',„\"(I! �7��,. ,� ��` I] \ 1,r�. o e pOp1►:IItl�14p , 'P r74 , t it f fi' '' bPi,I ! `,-- '/ 5 r�Z Y= .n . I ., " :°�) �i Lea ( aLI p. ,•,• � I,l ' • t!A'.v /;PROPOSED i F BUILDING A .., 1 7 d //`*, - \ ` 4 RODRs o JG,]00 csi 1 s.1I Y i. $ \ /j ZI -�' ` I N5.200 GSF 1 1� I\ I MMAN2,20LE ER \\,-. /), /zy 'P4 �o \ ~y' . I - PF 3s.0 i,L ,.� .\ %�1OF�- �. \�. �,�/ U ' e€ \ ,7 • ..,,,,1 N b< 7 j''i ! ( \' ,a�. \\ CONNEQ11pgl I \'.'?.:`: ��� J o 0 E \• G • O II(�II�I IT'I�-1 ; ''L I I�t�S A?, \ I ., 4,-. �. /G G S�wNER• J . �N \ ' 'EI�F^m '. _ ' 1'I ,•'-' , I� ` d i \ '�-,: ��" / . WENFM F p 6 �t F=c 1 I• I I ,� \ / /i/,/ e EG.INO J605290n84 CO w _ III--- I\i @• 91 1 y I J. PROPOSED<%�° @ -ca . I j 1 -,':�, i yd '! IiI, ^t SAN.Sa Y 4� i W 3 c, = I F rx, I; , , I i,.,1 ONE f aln ( > In =a .p. I \ �./ Q W V / / "<Oa�. K`�;yF- '-i— '�-r-��` .` `.'$,\\ -%�/ ',cup,:u�a' ,4 7 a 9s • ) o. Il i� •..x.OS '••<,F,^� _ I IJ�! I ♦ 'Y i ' ��- z w cw - l 3AN.1 SL}y .�' I� {iP�•�,<ti< ��F�: 'yi�l 1' .�1\\ �- �!i �r /% /R. HOl ` a-•, ,/ J a �� nor We 2 ' moo°' MAN E I ' , ' / i '�` / J ¢�a i Y ■r■ I/��'' ! p��;ipl' 1i7 "1?fj' '• / �%' In w 1 Alls !I I 9_]i PROPOSED )< 1 i _ , (;•,•%6 // ! O 0 m /�i '� ` \ FIRE HVII' --i 1 SAN.$EWER i O I_LfIRF:•HYOPPM; \� :�, / r O. I �1' SERVICE gE , •-1� fig. o 1 ♦ 'g.P ► 1 PR.•x17.w� Al =t .� i / DRAINAGE CH.wxa to @g + SAN.SEWER BUILDING B „aP" P•OPOSEO • Ow R ,• �/' / MAN 0 ROORS 11 36,30D DV/ sm.SEWER /— _ `' •'- 2 • �/ aED csP MANHOLE I-- L,•,1:/; / -1�• �'� `� I� PROPOSED ' fr=sss ` ;', ;I I • "0 O Ill,),„.."---- „, •s 71I WATER LINE gI II11►'-' ` \ IL '¢ T� BUILDING C •ROPOS O�fi.' ✓ rs"m a / g w S i ig 5 I __- �. ,SERVICE-1 � ,/ 6,000 GSF -..I // =i h � kJi ..:,',' /i /'•,- ' ' -c.`'`)'z 's' .,.,----'- .r!--c.; V POIPITfOF m 9mfEr - `_ °IT( N gION ,Q''� _. I - ..•;•ssew�_� \-- nkEP>%E, ►�. //� m w WATER _ 1.1 �� y,- • _ :x<. ` �\- LL / P{piSxA ayae yF'N b� Jj �REH��N Q, I, LEGEND =// /,. t7b PROPOSED WATER LINE _- --— �/ �\ .f// PRAES 01-a]- p J PROPOSED nor WOW W f a l JJJ _.• 8 9 GO •Q '\J COSMO WARER U E �• �\ -.��-c L Ex 01 V EXISTING SIRE xrORANr AW -�° `\ CITY RENTON ' ® PROPOSED SAN.SEWER 1wE ,\ /% P --- !DEPARTMENT P PUBLIC WORKS .. PROPOSED SPN.SEWEA MANHOLE H �ti. IXISIING SMI.SEWER uNE `\ F/// -- \,' ••w % BIDING SAN SEWER WWH01E '� C ;� SIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION .mc „\ /%/ n z \ max® c.� >3 DRAM BSN .x a ]nGrop - FM...poo .GE D p R®a x. R aE �m r 3__,, 4 L File P\atlskproj\]]25\preliminary\)]25-pu deg Dote/Doe 09/09/2000 17.OB Scale.1=50 cRucN%rels. Z]]25PBZ]J25PS.Z]J25P1,Z]]25PU, oar•a�w.�.a,: a OPUS - SOUTHPO I NTE - -------------\ CAR.pORA17.CENTER DRL -- — // _ f Jb�r- cZu. _rl^r PF` ,A` SGHEMA-.C._ANDSLAPE'LAN — 4. M3AYaFi A:.�CGATES ,'. r SCALE I'.40'-O' NCRT4 !f3•/ _. / .✓ LANDSLA?=ARGiITEL'ILRE CATS: 6 SQTEMBER 2CX,17 TXYJG-46 - i�"� - _J , : . . Ri'JNE 425.834-SbeS / _ 1 _ '-'i �)� _ - D .:, �J �' `/ 3. 1 1 1 1 1 I f"mot ... ,,, - •ve)ti„,,...- 1,..t.iL_J, — A47 , ' 4 iy?I , I I I I ) 1 � � � 1 9� i I : * llr�i i i� i 1 a ` I i �� I 1 i+' „�� , ,N ` \N. . .. =�" ,,, o IY M I( I 1 I i 1it y// 7 `emu"�;;; N`'a `Ty,I,Iw,L '• • i. ��j � " � DI � ! I 11 "Il �I ( I I + ( I I 1 I I � I ! r ± 1 ± 1 iyC oc�1 l ` \ 1 S (. ��''Ii:l� - � ri, a . D 3. 1 11� I I 1 i I 1 I 1 , 1 ' wr -04 .� I I I j I rr�� /��{, {IM I i I f I i I t j �s�.. ivired . j , r j III � }I I 1 +I{ w± ! I ! '� 1 A } t 1 I ! I • I "At . , r•1• it -t '! '4 I I i ( I I, • \± i' ii i I fiI tt as ( Ii Li r r ,�*• ,� Il �, I s� 'S!. / ill 1 �" "! I • - I ` • '+m, 'MOP/11 i I 1 'AN `w i ' I 1 I I 1 ,#'1.' '��1�Ir `�rI r fw �,14• ,' x 7 11,170.1ri%rw..106.:,.*P"r62.1.11.11111 - 4111—T.- - liwire121.1.int: n r l I I I I I t' / ' I.- -1 -- ' 1 - ''''.41/4 4 4- .4. J I I ± •% III Mil "; o ^'j, - *' I Lt �; IU �► I I I 4 ,' 4 mo "A" I I , PLANT SCHEDULE , ;•L. N .• .i.1eo` i. I* _ �f Ill I i f I i , eoreexKAre,074424 WI se I L •. ." I_ '/�}i.. r.w.1 '.•� - •.,. 7S/d Af! � !`,� ,' r' ry '4 rtt-•5 Mk .cer cwawvrrvre wnt 001. e.e / b1; I• I . . I . , I !L A r I rS'. /Ki.Wer eaee+r reeer/r wwnt ru.. BED ' + , , /, ecrA.Sxmcrr/xannm 0.141 rc�. e t ,Ik _ _ 5�oi�o _- --— : `ji •�' *ilit)i.E7 —'- _ '03 rs�e mCOAL t Ka.000000 lwkro216.ragan•na n u C 4. CC''rr I I �1�/, bS 1 ,:�. II "r a_ „,, -- .. _: 17 � 7 nrAu eee_rkrxes+mAe .a.. ao \ • , ' 11111. �BIM r 'r. J-: - • I Ir ,I 1 (151rLe5 IUM 0006 • e i rr ;?* �,' ! mlel e,lnr/•mrAe aad.um ••-rn aarei. ,\ Tl 4� i ` `'�, �� -■ .■,� •^�� •)` �'••"1 _ k•{+O •• `-'�Ir-1 1 - ~ ' .........M,KME,'/'16LIIIrY W.V. r-r N, e.AYOG 0 yl ..41 . :'��.•� r•.'sf. ` • i�• ' y I wrnnws.aurArarw rwulw lw.c r.r n. rar'oc. Y < J . MEM , ! ■ 5„t; tr RM.SMif qIM�.WID Yr;I' WOiM, : WdH aAYOL iiiis 1 i� �- - -mo w ._ 1 �!, ' ^ulMa YtaS/Sb,1�eb+Q r.rn e1e SOc +�j �. + ►vier%�+,r:,R .*, :♦��*' J �� . .ram .� .�a _ csw Haan/n5•e Aorsee r•r n. Mason \ i':„ ... •Y�! � orw„.A asovuoe/e5v.lea e•-r:e Meeoc E �.� gar I-- i - - _-. . -' mwe weewrw/ra:wla A*SI r r a. as roc. ± - . 1. f�1Iht - - \• 1 - — 7 _ .0.6.0 MU oA 0.0t,rt... t •wmwae r-r., rar.roG 1:1 I -- !.LCOMARtAOfL9KOIMe r•rH N410L _ r.l a _f_ (PII MIOINDSLYarYWY',...,a rKAV!m.-•weal Irr,O Leo.SOL 1 60000000001r0./wCGL . r•r MR *MTOL ^ -,I ....'.... ../... r♦nsM •'.Y 0A. MS TOL A .,`I i IF% r iIli Ik Y ,_ I � d,. JLA.rI DSYD,/ALA r-r Ma MlTO4 9 i J J. I I' 14471.1l1 41�' 1II MOP ee1r m uaa rraee I ��� I � Q T (�ti 1Ao 1 'r` ''�`, a 6004 noteuo.,*Va.Pa. r.r-n. Maras. �%il„ +;� / :!I i'7 I •', -', ' woxwp5a.v*/eooamuw r-r sn WAS oa. it i� 33[[:: _ . I to �' ,I1110) zaar/ctarfl,aee / S'' 11 '+•os%dr "-- -- _" — _ coaneerl wnourra+neac r-r er Ms �� 1 — I . r .611.1•060 MLA I 1 a816rro.N o.c/•�Tlr.+wlME. �=r.O. TMie ,� ;/'1, _. _ ? `r j` .'� ...._``ls. ... -� - Mom:: :: -- ! - v __. _ w,,.a•,ae�, NA101K.tY;AOer10MAleprTLr LA, INL �� _ I/' f rlcrm. ""'wAaa/a.06. luc sr aL ,III ''-'' . I I - ���. 111 g ' nx x wwvusroeo roa IMa srx �t- � •�. ?q�IFI _ .__ '/ /i I rara[Asm ourelc'.a•.65,. . Irv. sk•oG 41 i'y,. • fl 1�-^'r II t .•'•.•-,r -- I A.YA4ROBN/ND.M.aI. M. xOL �y! MLn'lkVl.'BeeuLY/NMHTIrIMe IMl 1.'OL 7 ♦ IyeUL•NpCp/ryHO®IaN42 Y'Cr M•OG L- '-Z' r - 11• _ e ^S 15Y I I I , �h' q � r.r..+aer.a...0 Lw r•oG firr �' ' '("'�, ' , 1 i rr_. _r iT �• s� o ir, ►'1 I oan.As ro eewml..eres I111 S �.�ic �� '� 1 , RII } � 11-C ®baAGA56T0.Ar ILCe..TAIMk x04 C■■■ � JILI�� I+� Ir.l� �: , 1'a I I *� wnvelv!-1.ueTw+rw�rae�ec Iw.L xoa ]( S C•000�► '`�._ fir!: w,f.e 1 .em e.rtt�I .-. w I.�• _ _ ,r\\. •_ ' - aa'-.erf� pLIC/t�1r i 104JOCALBs'6t,ot.roknlr ILIL 4OL _ t H� I .eclalAw.�eA/ccecan.rrw-.mnaeo Isn,. xoL/ra 4-'Il O• D - ' • -,.� 1 1 UM ` I lor. 9ONaft r.MAL.rr♦ur lak x•x 1 105'A Mr.esvk"/Olrlr.l,K MIIrMI(Ar Irv. xOG j"'ilia. A.� —_ + • — eM61t I0N MdW! 1 - - ,.e OAIeCeO STALL TAB(( ——WfTa3V.iirMq " �.Tip 057" ea.if/..//SIVieQl.._—. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • SEP 1 2 2000 ®ci+cttfcn . .... brir __ �'"` OPUS Southpointe T Corporate Center 1 - - _ _ \ Renton, WA September 6, 2000 ■milms■ J < J . 'IEEE :■__■. (0 I _ — - _ _ • _ 1- — = F.F.E. = 36'-0" - Typical Northeast/Southwest Elevation E.I.F.S. Equipment Screen _- Tinted Insulated Glazing In Painted Concrete Panel - Clear Anodized Aluminum Framing 1_ -L 1 �Ilq. ( I � _ _ rr ;' PI i I 1 _ I i - - - - H -I i - - f F.F.E. 36 0 ■ _ — �- - - - s�'�! �F�o�N� itk - E.I.F.S. Mouldings & Coping Clear Anodized - °ve& ?QQQ _ . Alumnum Canopy S. z F® J7 Typical Northwest/Southeast Elevation 0 15 30 60 /1 OPUS® A Development of Opus west LLC Exterior Elevations L • `ate s OPUS. N . � 4 y ,�� + ; ..��• J��0�, , �V< ; , ` �,�aI \ South ointe P a • \'®\ >;: �.. . .alp` ° ��:. ` '41�'^• ,.�: :. Corporate Center N. n Uq <.,[, ��'c °! bP a \ 'Z' 4 ,. � �J . �V/ '� ��J,4.y'�1. % 0 ' �Hr To <. �° �+ ,O 'z f' � ems: �,." �v *� ' �► Renton,WA - ro No H �`� !9'kyf � ��� i.. � �j�',�C� 40181110„. '� �'�.i � �"� � �` August 3,2000 I ........ FqN a ..rg 4rq i,�`h;°�Sv • •\�,. i£, `�c'rz'1� J `S�' \+; ... F„.. � \ Rq war ":� V4>. / Vi � e4, s 4 ei*/ft €` �J-s a ,ii41!,,,,, / / 4' Ail /---., — killt7'T.'''' :'.4-\x ,:9 jo. . 7 r '' At •t.54,44'N ,•-,...''.. . . 041$16-4-,6101.!,,';..:,::1!.•'. � W lau Y l' a .� :Are ssxeour£ss__.SgfgDY . \- ' � �' `// / 9'.< . 6 .. E 1 :p � j� t� - '\ / , e,ss7,4,,,,, ,k,„ 't!-\.:,\As.)' d • • 0a � •...". ' ,O,\ �a . / v ` o S'2 d • t 3 B • ' \�p • ` s /' ... `\'>,„4: �, a' %C (/ ( \ \i � ri �lf Q /a�/�N 7 r° 6� aa :.....:.:..... : • -4110110:atiti.;•..•• -, .46,-'•.0,--,. %,gE •-os .--:.i.'!. ,,, .4 els.....N. • •-.4, , ,• k; --..v.,-\`.1,'.....,- • �� !� ire t f ' •"4*mY#V' : .8:2�Z! aw .. fi "e 3 0 t �6 d �9.i1: r !•� � m. Cam. a-. e r � � aV"I / / ,'::---% .;`2,ZY' V • gst.vyc. ,• f/�� 4, V ti �7-at-1` %m Fv @ �I ' . V,•4v> � G� y / i' , \, E \ '( r tip,♦ C'S bi ui • i 149 9y<¢ 4. . UNT t t i(/•' i�i ' +d.. .v�g # Q `[ . ,.ti. \ .. _ dp• . i 0 150 300 600 AIM �® 0' A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Vicinity Map . _ . . 0 OPUS. Southpointe . . Corporate Center Renton,WA September 6,2000 r - T- — T = 7 — T — iii::::-- "•---7-7-11. — T 7 i =Office Space 'LOBBY I I I I =Corridors/Lobby ___ • P 30 • ..„:., =Restrooms i , I , 1 r Typ. .-1 ELEVATORS....iri al I I I I ,.,.,.... i I i I I I I I I i,...lia =Stairs/Elevators ___________i___ ___ 4)°—:,.______;;:::_-77-t,__I S'T,Al..,._R__T_____i_____,___-____i—__________i__________i__._ ____I i.A.1"1 =Mech/Elec/Janitor ''''t f L',.,;„'; I iLS- I ; • - .., : , s / - 'i I - ci; I Cli 0:20—&A ' ,---r , '''''''l i, . i 8 1 i 2ZgE j i- '„ , 11; . Z I , •,,,,-,-,,, •ELEC/MECH j i ELEC/ ;f CORRJOOR 6:' I I>: I I WOMEN'S' MEN'S' JANITOR I I CORRIDOR . ..: ' MI r i i 1 I il N3.TO.0; i i I II I I 1 OFFICE I i I I 1 I I .q SPACE ; I I i I I I ioi I . NTS. :.. :). ,..' . '...:-: .:i.. Imini I 0 15 30 60 °31 OPUS® A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Typical First Floor Plan , _ ''•'-'--:.-'..-t,: :'--.E:i•-•;;!--...,---..----.,'-'. :,,....:.:--.--,'.• ,-- '''•:-,...- ''.'-',:,,-.'------ '--:',:-..-..-•',„ ••-,.-.-::--,-.„'-„,,-.'„:-..---„•.,-„,......,..,-,:-..:.,,.:...„.. •-....:: .....:- ,- .., :,,,, ... . : . .. .. ,,,..,, ..„ . . ,, ., , ,..... ..,.:,_ -,.. . - . - ....- Oil opus® :, „,, .i,..„.,.. .... :, ..„.:i,,,.:., . ,..,:., ..::.......;. ,.: .:, :.•.. ••,.. ..7..4.,..::::•:.4;, •.:.- . :"-, - .- .... .....-....."..ii....,-.,„". ..'..-..... „'.. ..". ...... --. .....:. • ,. ; ;.... ,r'... - • ._ , .. . Southpointe ...,.......„;.,,,:;,,.....-„, •:-..„..• ... ,,,,..„-,-„,,....:.,.,.„..,.• ,..„,,,,,,:.,...,-. „,.,-... „,,...-....„. ..„,„:,„. :;,, :,--,--..,•- ..,_,--..,-..;..• •-„.„ ,. ,.....,,...,:,,...,.....,-..„,...:.".„.,„,..., ...,,, ....,:,:..,, - • .,..:,-.•....., .,....„..,....,.,...,,,..„:,....-...,.,,---,.,,,••: -,-., - ,..,,,.:.,:,..-.-„,,.-• . ...„..- . ,..- -,-,--,„ "c„ •,, . -:.-- ,:-., ,-,.,-.• - --,- -, .--. -:,-"----„,--.--,-•-• --,-,.- -.-„......, .. „ . .. ,,, .. , • . .. . ....- .. ....-.,.„•..-., ....--.,..,..:-.;..,,,,. ..,-.....-„•,...., .: , ... .. . .......„,,,.,..,:„:„..,:•.,,.. . ..•.. .. ,..„„.:-....,--,,,„ Corporate Center _ .......,,,..,...,.„..„....,. .„.., ... „. .. ,,,..... .,,,:...,..,..... ....?...,....., :. ,,,,,..,...,. :... , . . . ... ....„..,.....,,,,...........,.., ..,,,„....,.....:. ...,..:...:,......:.:, :-...,..:.-:.- .. :. -:.:..,:... •: .: ..................: ... ,............ .............,„-„,...,,..,..,:,,..,,,,........ ,,,,,...,..„.....:.,r„..,,,,,.......,..,„.......::.....„... .„, .,,. :„.,......,,,,.......,,....:... , :::,.....,.........,..::,..,„,,,....,-,.:,,,..4:.,-..„,...,..:.„,„.. .,.......... .. ,..... , ........„ .. •.. . . . .. .„,......,....„,„,,,...,....,...... ... . ..„. . ....... , ..,.,., •.,.„....,.. . .... ... . . •.,...,,..... ... , ..• ,...,,, ..,.,., .. ,„,,,.,•••„....... .... . ..,„.:...„......,..,,:.:,:„...,,..,,,,",:.:„.„,...„...... ,„: ...„.. - ....„.....,...„...„,„..„.....:„...„.„.,..„...„:„..........„....•„:.::.:.,••••,. . .....• . „.. • •... .•,. . „....,,....,....„..... : ...„,1 • . .., • . . „ .. ..... . .. „ . ,•,. :, ,.......,...„:„.... .:: ••••:„.....,............--.,.... ... . Renton,WA September 6,2000 '-:-.;',':'1:4 ',,!..,:..:,,--:.„,-...:.:-,,,,,,-.,„,„-:.,,;,.1.,-,-,,,,,,::-.',,,...1'..,,,,,,,,,..,,.,I.F.,.:-,,'...,,,,g.c..;..,'..,-;: ,-..:'.',,:'„,,•,,-:,,,,,,,•'„'.-:;„,,,,',-,,,,...;,::;:-,-,.,,':'..',,,..,,!:,.v.--..,:,-,-;.',,-,,.,i,,----,,-,:,,:,:,,,,,-..,..,,,,,,-..,- ,...„,..,,„.,..,.,„,,,..,.,„,,,„,„.. ..,-,,,..„....„:,.:,,.„-,,,,„,,,„:,-:„,,,,:,„ ,-.,-,,,i,:,,,,•,,....,,,,,,,,,,-....,..,,-,......,:„,-„::,.:,-.„..,...,.:,,.,;.,-,..,,,.,.. ..:, ,.,,,,, .. .,..., :.., ,:....... ,.....,. ,, ... ,, ,,, ,, , . , , ,, , ,,,,,, .. , ..„ . ..,, . .. . .. . ,...„•.... .. ...,....... . .„ :. ..,.,.. ....:. ... .„..• . . • " .• ,., :::.: •..,..::..„,..,...,...,..:....„ .:, - . - ,, •-,,,,.,.: •.-,....,-.. ,...-:, ...--, ..,..:,,.:-,,..,:::•„.,,-, ,- .-• ,„,,,--, - •• - - - - ...„ „...„.. .,„....„,„.,..„„.„,:„.„....„..„..„, ... . •.,.... .„....,,..: ......,...,..„„„„„.„.,,,,...: . . . .. •. . .. . .„..,.. .. ._.,,..,..„....„,.....:.....„ ...... .. :','..,,,';.:,',7-.'',;:.q.,-:;-'-:-.'-•:.':-.i.'''''''''''''''' --I----------' ---17---- --r' ' : 1 =Office Space -i-...,...-'.. :-.;..'-.,......:,......±::.1.08 SY.---- '...:1 . / 1 I i - i'...,.„; (7771JBE ,.,..'.:, .-:::,..,.....,....,,, t..-..,....., ' T-- - ----- :.---.- - ,,, •.,::. , , .. ..„. ..... .:, LOW 1 1 i• ;'r';• '';';;••••;"4';••••• II.I-.:,-:Il.:,;•1 =Corridors/Lobby . .- :'.'c!-'--..:;"'''-''"Ii I , • 1 .i,0:,_ i 30, „, , , , .• ., P i i 1.- i. Typ. I ELEVATORS---:4' " . -. :,f111,1 5-1 =Restrooms 1 i i ' i' -1 •'-•---'• 1,•?::•-•''.•;;I,-• i -,:---I ."---.:-. ,,• ..—..,, •• •;• ' '• Agit:kg =Stairs./Elevators giti, -.....-:;.:,-„filigi; - i 1 1-,.1"-,-;'-.'17-"..::-.-:•-:.:!,-E,-,--:-,-•.-:,•-,::'..'-7-.'.'I::;'7:.:.:.t'1- -...--7.7.7.1i C O RR I DO R - 777-7 -'.1-'.-'l-':--ii;-'''.-:'—.:--.-:•'''''.'.'--7'.iF'--7-----'-7'-'-"- -'•--7-----'',9•"::-::'-:,--`''-'-----•--••-.-"A-•t--"R--,-•i-4•';STAIR---:- '• -I .--;'•. -'(.0.-*--.,711,----:-7--7.. —.-7 1t1r---CORRIDOR--. 'r-71 4, ii -Mech/Eec/Janitor ' -• v,. -, .„ : ••• 4-'4.--..• ii!'In•;1:4;•;R: i --•7 Z:::.- ',. : ,,,,I;;?..,,, ''••*—•• '+.'• - I- -s;i I -oFFIcE -T <.' kA :.4,A4';, 1 ":z; 1 ii)PFFAIgE 1 Et..Ec, :-.4.1..,...,"3,,..,,, ''.•,-."4.;••l••:,;.-..•;'"IIr.::.. i 4,...:.:::.:, ..4•,..i..--.-.: ,.;.,-.4..4-,4 .fir, ,-.ELEcimEcH i i SPACE : :I.,.....A., •-;''.... s",,,-,.. .,....... 1 I 1 • :,,,,,,...4,,,,I, ____i__Lwo.m____EN:_s--___i______7_,EN7_- .i______,-,,n17.-.)i,i___ __:,.1._,- _____., : • .,,,,,:,,f,,,,,,,,,,,-,..?1, _ ___,I,:„...,•,. - -:-. •,,,,„,,,. -_ .,„,..„..• -.-.-.• ...,I., STAIR , 300" N.T.S. OFFICE ,'..' -;- ",„;'-•I.;•• - •-:-";-4':, .....;,,, :' b 43- ' i i 1 1"4"...••• i•ii".;;,...1"i,;:l • 1 1 '3; I 1 I SPACE I ..,,•47,1*?,,..;, :i.., f4:i.• :1 • ' , , •;•;•• "I:;',:.';,;;,;.ir'.!':i I ; I •; •i I 1,.,.1..0.••:nt.i•I', ,,.4:'"..;,:, I.-.".,.;..:. .".;.1.:,::„•;,;. ..::,'...::" :' ...' '.•''". . . •:1,,:.,...".. ..:,....,.,......,.. ;!,.,... :., :.; .1,.'.'...t1r,s...,:f'f,,:. ,i',.;,..,,J:,,.,',..•11 ' i ''' '..-" ''"''.-' '' •• . .. ....„.. :... • • . .• ......• ...,,• .-: 1:-..,•.-.:-„,-,---•-,-,„-, „- .,.....--„ ' - ' -• - - ' - - ' .....„ .:,. ,.. -... ,. ,.„ , ,,;„ .. ,.. .... . ,,, „,,, ., :,,::„•,,,,,,,,,,.,, ,..,,; ,,., ,, , „ .. . . r. -,.:-.: i:.,„:1„:„..„. -.,-,•.i ,,,i„,-„-::„':1„-„„,„„.•,„..1 -,-..,-„„--,*•,„,..•,--1.---•,-,.„-:, .-- ,••'.--•"- - - -- ,- - ' , .2. .'-. „:".1;'''.::,'',"'-",''', ;'-,-,',...,..•,',,,,',, ,'.-::•,,,',-;f1'..,:•-•,-;.:ii- .,,'. ',„•;,.-',..,.'.:,„.: '...,......-. -,:.•„,.....„',,"„-; I,' ,.;',-,:,i;:,;„,-•::„ i.••''::' I.:.--.: , , L',:„'...„ ,;]';,;-,',,f-,:i-..::..,,;;.;:,,:;-,-..„-;,,,,":1,,-, ;,' ' ,-,....,,-";-I .„'; : '. : . ••' ,-' --'- ' • - - ' :..', '''-',';',.",„„'„:„:',4".'„,c,'-''''.:.:'.:':','',..,'„:','i?I'll'.-•''r,',',1'il:'';'.',';„"...1'''.:"1.--'.'..;-''.'.,..-:'',:„."'-,-.'2-"''.''''''.''' ' '' ' '. -' '" ' ' ' - '''' ' . Z „il.-J;','.•;;'''E! :',:.:'.'...',.I.'•':::: •'T I •••::••...,,•: ...1,".' •..,:,•....-:,.1,•,'...1. '': ''.....,f,.1.:',I•:i, , ' 1:i 1.''..:::..'::•1.•: .:1' : ..''' ••• '', '':'•: :-:. 7...1 1.,,'I_,1,1,...,11".:1....,.,' , I:,, -..•.....,„":".:•:.:."•1'•: :. •: •• • . • • •: '' :•:: ' • ' :',' .'''':1::„•'':••:.:•;.:.••••:.•••', : • •: • •:•1'.••.:.•••':'•:.•..,: -1.:•. :-..':' ':• ' •: ' '• -•• : •• • : - - • . .: ti. ''':'.::'••,'•'.:.:,, 1: .•': ..':'• •:: : ..•,•:,••,•:- .1 •'.::..I•:'•., '' ••-•:•: 1•'"-'I.'• ' -• •. ' . •• ' - ' ' ' , '',' • 1.1-•"'1:'••• .'•:"•;.::1::::''''''t''••-•"::;''':" .:••''.••••••••';.''''''''...''••.''•••'• '•'::•. '••''' .'••'' • ' .. - '' ; . 2 :•:'-:'.•• •:•:'•..:I::•"1. ...:: '•:"• l• ::'.'• •'... .'.'••• • :: : "' :•.• ::,`:: -•:.'' •::' ''• : - •• • • ' • ? '' ••••'''''••• : ' .: ::: - -•••:••• I'. . ' :' :' • ' -• : : • 51: '. ...:'• -„ . - ' ' : '' - - -- . ' -- -- ' _ , - . -.-.. ,,-- ,. -., .- . , - - - -_. - -,"- - -: - .,:.-.-. ''.- • -' - . - ' . --, - . . , . ... , .. _ . ,, , . .. . . ., , , • ::: 7.-. ---. •• - -, • -,. ..- .- -, : .;,-.': '-_,..- ...--,-'.: .---,-.---.:..-• I.•:-.- ', - -- .- „ - '. ' -: ' -- . 0 15 30 60 -...-...-:-.:::-.......p.:..-.........:...,:=...,,',..;;M:.:.;-..e.c.,t1-.W.,;*.s..e-,..4,-.1.............. ......„ Typical Second Floor Plan .01'4 OPUS 0 A Development of Opus Northwest LLC ...........,..,.....„ :: :•4:-„.'j-E':-1'. :•-•:;:.! •-." !-:':;.'.'.'j.-f.''-',-',.-..-- -illt-,'.-;-,,Illt-1:.-..u.,,,,,i., oliOPUS•-••-- -•::.4. ,:.,--. :-ANIV--ri-."::-.!' .,.-:.i:.:iiii;-3;i,::.--;.i"..' :.-.. ,-4i'1-.. ..;i---„i .-.. ...;:'•4. l',•;,--:i..:i !':-•f44--:--,-.,--:,,:,.-,,,ig,iii: ,,44.,...-.:;,,,T..4ii4,,-„„,,,.. .----- -:','L.• ii .i:. -...iiiii..-•:,-.4:,:. --f••,ii • :-,',il'':,..'"''--'-111; '''.iii:F.- !';',4i.:'.,iliiiii ';--,1:'ii---i-,:',.:0.iii."',i.li .,..„E,4iiiiii.::-:?', ..?„I.jHA',':,,p35..i.. 2..--1.i',1',Iii:,.?."'...-":111-,-,.,-- ' ''''' ;•- -:'"- • - '', ,ii,..--;.:-. 1-,-;i.„-i,- ".... ..i'..:1.,:,:4!,'.1il!'i.i',..0."''''''.1-,'E;.'-!i!'i'.'ill-..EFii,,!' iiii,a;i-N!ji'hiiiiiiiUV'''',....;K:'-',-ie--'.:..4.-•;::;i:i:d"'..,.....,..'!!!!;: '..:.,i;',1';',1-:.:iiii:'.,-„'..', ,,,I,,,,ilii'"-"ill'i'dr-"' '''' L'..';'-i--%1"-.'d-:.-1-.. ''':".:.....,...T'I''...ii,'It'.ii;i'l,'„;'d;i; ;....:Iii-•:. ',..'-','..."'i,,ii- :-it. .-,.i;; ..:i.:.,,,-....'..'...... iil;'.. ',..''-.,iii -".. 1 -1- I --: . --. i'"-- '"-- ,._., .. ,.,.... . ..... Corporate Centert .. .. . . .. .„. .. . . .. . .. -.. • , ii. I 1 1 boenPI:6W°,A2 10 nO0 te !:M.'i'' il': ::,,'ir'']]]''TFi'' .ii,':'.!--... .,i'lil, •'"]''''..:. -11,--'.-'i::: ..'','i.:-- ., '.''' .' - ' ' '41' ... .:. • .. .-- - • 0 '"!'..- liiiL:-'1,-r.-.. il.;'' '.-.'.":'!:Ai;i-: '.• 'Ir : '" ..., --.-..',..'•; ---- -- . --- ' - „,.... • - '.• ' ' .. -' mantsmragsamft- ,'''',','•-.4'''.'',.;'1•:'..'.]U..'",'.:."...!'&.. .'.;':''':...i...i0'''1-''-.:.'-.:'•. 4'4.'-L'--'.•.'i.'Z. ii'1'H•F'7;,'',-''''.'''-.,''`,j'.''_:'::'''n•.'':';,.,,4,•a• .'..,;i,:;',:--,4i":..-.-.f,,.:3i..- 4iiia::1.r-6:.q;.'.:-.i•:.,L.2.:F.T,F. E1q• r30:...'..1:..6"1......,0.'';u:l-f..U-",k.ir7'sti,".i1sl,i+",.,eo.:..;2.:-;,i;u;..E-;.";t-•oi44:,Q.P1sl:.,l:4i1r_..:::';4.$42#g,:,_E:T.:t:,'ik:,2%i.iat:'',1 ,g54iNr,;il,-„.t„.:•:A:A,•:Z::m.It1I.4I"tI.1'''.oSf;.-::T :4Mi:f"4,r,',".:4,..0•';af::,:i.;•V'0::i-''i,z.-,:N:.•,i:•.,1,:--:."i.:e1i:0i:‘7..7E.7j.,M',:Ae:1', l•P:,2.i.:',t..i-a."t.'...'..::,-'.:::;..ii'5..,t..--c.,:.1''.:q.',:A.;:,i:..iiiMiilir.iit...:':;.,;i...I.t:..r•,.'.:,,.:i.ii.,7:6i,;.;,Tfil.0•.t.K .'H ARW. .,.. ,i,Ri,-,i•.,,Al.'.:,-.:1.;i„.:Aqii.ii;,'i::].,.di.•1ii....,:..'t;.:,.,.jii:i,.:,k:,,i'-.'3:.1-,:i):4:,:..:10.,,..;!.;,i',.,rr1.-;....:.1,4--%i,:...4-'.•7.:.1i.1,,0:.444•-,,-:,.r,!e.i:,:::,.ti;!.:'!t,!;.r','g4,e1,,.:!:,-4::'l.il-;.r.'t:I,-l•'i,fi4t"ii..i-•:Ffi.tt.,ii.,i:t:.5i,41..44,.iiiit.L"-;.,"i;'i:i,'.E.:4V- .,Z...-L..1, .i- . .._.; '7"k1411.!: •-"Tlt":-.:::. g:4174:1i0r414L'-'.. '..;2:11154/er;•!--.M.h.411i-4,54.4:!!f!'-,-„A-W:Si%,*.-:,irg'-',.?:-:::'..1'4'141'':.:11PU':''7,'4V-',...if.Z.qr,,1,,Pil!!tii..;......!4„:'1::i,:iii::”f•,!,,-l':i:.'-',":-.-4i4ii::::;4•-4.::,i,iN;y.::::::ifiliO'.r:',,-.41P'INII:!il:i.„...--;* - ''.-,,:k_.'';;;•11:4141cil:J;-";'..:A41jla;°":•.':!::::3 :14011.04.:10-1"iji"• (SI:t•;31;!:.11:::1'Diiir:':''"k.l'ik.ii:r5i11:.1:10[.:...:*f!!iit;:Ni6A;e:i'i'iiliviliriiif4,:,:i.E.:.Niti..?,:i#111157. 1T;T:jr:".j'1.-'1',1,1i''.'-:'''' ,::a.-,..... -, .,tiif46t tievAtion ..,,,,--.;:ik,,,,,,,,,,,,V"74,ti;;91. ..11i.otilii:,„:..-e:!.1.r.:.i..-.:i'gr..-,i,r::, !!::„.!L,,,,.!.:2•;,,;.,!... .,,.:2?:::,.:,..,..!..,,,,.:.,:j,::-::::::....:,,,.:-:,!ii,,,,,,,:.....„:::.6,,,,,.....,,!,!::.!:,:.:,::,i. -,I:ii,„...:..,,iii,: ..:::..,.,,. ,,,.... :,,E,,_::::: ,,, :,. ...,,: y ''''''Iii':4''i.l'''A.iiii'•fi.'A'f'iiM'E'A:/140..:'.'ll.::',.,ii'i''''0:-.1?-tilliniliiPi4(:-,,;,.-.-:??..,1;111:!:'-',':,-g!!!,-,:.,Iii!,!,• p 7al , I •N3 rt.,....h7777,,... n. ,,,,,,,....7, !F:...i,,,],.iii'.---'- :,iit',....,-;:.;iii,.. -±,:::. i',-ii „- :. • „••;:.'.1,,•.-- J-' •''.-.::::.',„" -• .„ ::-- rE,:---E - - ..- -. _,..,..,....„,,,,-,„-.7.---..„.T.: - ;-,:-.„ -.:-: J.., •;,.-;..„:!::::.1iiii--4,,,.i,,, ...,-..,. -,..:4 ::,-,.iili,-„,....:..„ ...„, :„ :,...,,,,,,..,!!„.1. .,... . -• ,...„----i.:•:„. ..-",::i.'-',.. i'-,!'''''' ----'''''''''','':'...."-': .'!-:',;,:.f-:'.i'-'''!!!',E,Ii''! '..:,'.. , E,;;;;:iiii-'''i,,;,.:,.':",..':i.i,-.:-. , ' :,J.,;]].:i.-..DI'j''„ksj.": -,.,.,S.'"!!..'..'''... '',' *..P .-4,i''...:.1:-: :',.„:,'ii.i'f.-!:'iliiiiAjViii, .10,].......:'1:,!'..!"i'.'.H.,,,,,F.:-.-;iiii .:,,'''''';''' '"""..'''...- , ...:']iiii ''''' ,,, '•-''..". :.,..,,.. ' '-.'."'. 11:• ;:..ii-,-.,i1::'.- * :"ii.d.''''.'":'1Fe• ''.(1NI!':-.1'?4''r''''•Y.'-':..'." iE'''•;i!..':'•-.'-''''i -'Ji:...11.--.-:;;.•':E'.:...::":.:!'•TI.::":;,.iiii.;,-„';::Aii.,i,,-,-04i.,,..,-i.::!%:...:-..,i4:,;,-:.:.::i.-;H• •• In Equipment, Scr.ePN---•:•: :•Tinted Insulated Glazing In ii7,,,(1,::;-:Nili:...,i,,ii. :-:;...„.,]!,_,-,-,.,iii,,,x-:-:,..-:,. -.!ii:0,!1-,,.--,::..,,,p;... ,--.E!,,,, „,-,.••..i. •:::.....E,L,Fs, ..... :„ ..,.. .,. _. ___------, , Ai kiii,4,]1!..,,,,,.,-,,4:11,, iii,. '".1: - ,-...:,.,-:,-, •::-E.-...).. ...:. „ ,,......„....i,„.,.. .. 1 _ i , . ...r ........ ,., AnodizedClear . ... 1:17inual Framing _.......... ---- _____.:Tr.r.. - ffee,11111111111 1:0::: PaiMgdiPOI°',..i-i•-• --I;'."-' ----.,- ' ------: - ------ ---' , il -' -- • I,: f- iig ' IN irim' -... • '''-' ‘ - : : fril i:!:,-_i,]!,,F .-:, - •,.... • :::-:-•---- , --, 1----------74-1 tim udi,-1. 1 n 1.•• 1._. . ..p.„4 . . :. . . . iii is EN :.,,,,..,•,,,J,„,:i,,,„.,z E....,,..:All....,,.., L....,--,-,..,-7,..1,),. . - ;, . ,.--, i -, ,-,-- _.„. . _ , !'.. • . . . ... , , . • ___,_.. , „„„..,,,,,,,v,. .,...,n„,:.,..;,,,i• 1,, ,,,..1-..w. J. ,• ...,-, •,, , ,i i, . ,, ... .. ,- .„ - F. -,,,,- i'. 7 --•- • 't . - -,z•';-' ••,. ••'H'--- .-• i. '..1rTie•:''1pK-'e47•7 r--'_-A'-,-..-_,4'il_',"i-i1,'v_.e':,--L-.„-a i.r,'..--t..,.•...'„-,1-.,--.:1-...7,,7:E_7sii:.F 7,-I-:-,T7,,,-:7.:-:--7 z!,I•Tn..:.-:-'EL T.'..:2-'i,i: 'J.1-..1L,.,,•.1'..-,~.-.-..r.i..r-•--•.'-_._•".•.'.;..•-.-__ 7'.....,- ...,..' -.'u,,,•w,ww-w_.—.00‘4 ...'•.'.' LV0ni-63i4,ea I1N,Wt1Fr,i-1Rl,iin6-12:•K7Z1.a.W1M....?!i55.,-4"14?. .:..-..,. :f'. -• . . . , :guV111111= ,,:...,,,,,,iy.mmen ''''' '... 314w,,,Oggallig!, .„&,..1.ormir:W. AP.Mititk...likr:,,,,..,'"").;:rr '!;,';:7.;;..,:i;•":":i 4 iitif-Y.-441:'....4!'-'-:-:'.giril'ilE7v'.:ilg.'4.:7-4g:".,.§tiii-7.-';;:i.tr'." ''''''''' '..'''.''... :2::-'..1,:-... ..,i ''.0:-.•.--;111:f.,21%.,;-'3] .:3114.10010%:',::i.,,-...:1 --.-:4,;w-,,i ,.:44Alitig'.ibisq,.:`.:,--!;:.,.,,t,,t .".:,irN4--jOIT:tIlifil.S1!':.:%--E:•:,-..4-":4:i ''"7.-4.':,':',...:-..•...;,:-..,::-'-::'"'li::,,::.%:,5:1,,,,:'-'--ri-:.','I,...-::',:.i,.' '',.'..ki'.-..':.:::Eii ::: ':;:iiiP,':'-iiiii :':-.;:.-1:... ..--1:"• :.:,„?;--.''.!'",-.-likii,::.-.,.,.,- :;-: 4,1r,-.:±.,:=::-,i''',,,Y.:w.:,..-7,..?..TOV,:ifil,1*-.. 44.':;-",,,c4.11.:::7;'.1;; „'":77"*..'.gi5Tr..--''.,,-.. -V•"-:--e:',..:-:-.'--•'L.:,--,:--..,-:::,:-4,:;:-.-----,,..'..:.,-',.,::::_.-':. --.::::4,-',--..wi-i: -::::::.:'•-•';1::-.;:i;:i''. ';..-il -:...i.i.,p-''::.,,c...--.:E;:,-.H„::-.- :T .---.-. -,H.-..i'...:..,:. -. -:.,.,..,.:::,-:::„..:.'...:::: :. ',•'1.''''',a)*•;'''',";Ii4-,“ ----1.,---''-'',!.']'-''-'-`:-::':', ,''4',. ''''-..'''. ';.,1-i'.'n,I.E.• -E':'l';',.•i'••rq,'.4,K.-•.:',.".i::1E;,;,,-:-.-.;':'1-E'...ifi',.: j!i;''' ,:'.' . i'.• - . •"'''.: . ';.'... :i. --' ..'.iiiHi'.'.''EiiIii: .,..i.: .'".- .:ii: 'E:;:.._.,r'. 7, .,1,'• ". , „„ili ...]'.11.. • -- . 1...r°1--.1 1 ''' Typical-T' • il wes1/SoutheaStElevetow 0 15 30 so Exterior Elevations ..., „„,:.,,..„....:- ,....... 024 OPUS. A Development of Opus Northwest , ;`- . "Z & se 00 -17-41- ,_- _I I - it - - i RAMAC INC I'I RICHARD(TR)REIMAN 4 I CITY OF RENTON 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD SE I I 912 NE 113TH AVE j 200 MILL AVE S ISSAQUAH WA 98029-7253 I BELLEVUE WA 98004-3231 j RENTON WA 98055-2132 I I I I THOMAS W.&FRANCES F.TTTRIMM CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION I BENJAMIN M.&PATRICIA KINLOW 541 WELLS AV S I 800 CHRYSLER DR I 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104 RENTON WA 98055-2703 I AUBURN HILLS MI 48326-2757 I RENTON WA 98059-4764 ) I I 1 H 11 HENRY &SANDRA FRIEDMAN II ROBERT L.MOFFATT 1 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 8803 SE 78TH ST 3709 MEADOW AVE N PO BOX 811097 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040-5714 RENTON WA 98056-1551 CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 I� I � I( UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY I I RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C PO BOX 811097 I PO BOX 512485 I I 4509 116TH AVE SE CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 I, LOS ANGELES CA 90051-0485 I BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 I' I I( I SOUND ENERGY PUGET - I PUGET WESTERN INC SOUND ENERGY PUGET PO BOX 90868 I SUITE 310 PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 BOTHELL WA 98011 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 II( I SOUND ENERGY PUGET I SOUND ENERGY PUGET I STATE OF WASHINGTON PO BOX 90868 I PO BOX 90868 0 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 I BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 H ---- ------- � LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU TENG I LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU TENG i i LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU TENG 1116 WINIFRED AVE 1116 WINIFRED AVE I 1116 WINIFRED AVE PASADENA CA 91107-5558 PASADENA CA 91107-5558 PASADENA CA 91107-5558 I, SOUND ENERGY PUGET II PUGET WESTERN INC I PUGET WESTERN INC PO BOX 90868 II SUITE 310 SUITE 310 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 I j BOTHELL WA 98011 BOTHELL WA 98011 H TAMMY S.TIMM ROWENA HUMANGIT MONILLAS JAMES &CAROLYN CODDINGTON WILLIAMS AVE S#A 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 538 BURNETT RENTON WA 98055 I RENTON WA 98055-2726 RENTON WA 98055-1405 Ij < I � I GUIRGUIS HAIDY EL SHARAWY I GUIRGUIS HAIDY EL SHARAWY I 1 GUIRGUIS HAIDY EL SHARAWY PO PDX 2561 I PO BOX 2561 PO BOX 2561 AUBURN WA 98071-2561 I AUBURN WA 98071-2561 AUBURN WA 98071-2561 ) I ‘..._ � I I 1 1 I i I -- - 1 - � 1 1 , (- 1I II 11 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERTIE 1 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C % RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C PO BOX 811097 4509 116TH AVE SE 4509 116TH AVE SE CHICAGO IL 60681-1097 L • BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2757 11 I[ I I GERALD N.SPRAGUE 1 I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 I 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 � 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 11 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 111 it 11 11 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 13430 SE 43RD PL 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 I I BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 11 1 I 1 1 1 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 1 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL ' 13430 SE 43RD PL II 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 ' 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 _ 11 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 I 1 11 I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC .13430 SE 43RD PL 1 13430 SE 43RD PL III 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 ,i1 )ir - - - -- 1 11 • I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 1 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 II BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 11 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 I 11 . I I I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 11 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 1 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 11 13430 SE 43RD PL '1 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 , 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 j 2 - 1 II [I '1 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 11 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC j SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 i 13430 SE 43RD PL I 1 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 11 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 I I I I I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 13430 SE 43RD PL I 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 II •BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 )1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 }- 1 - < - - II SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 1 I 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 l BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 I BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 J l I I I . • I 1 - - - 11 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 13430 SE 43RD PL 1 13430 SE 43RD PL BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 11 BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1 - 1 1 1 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC I I 13430 SE 43RD PL II I BELLEVUE WA 98006-2123 1, I 1I J I, II 1 I 11 1 . 1 I I _ _J ,i l 1 ,, !, ,, 'I I• II I I! 1 I;• - ! I I II I I I II I I I I I,l I I ( 1 I I I I I I II I I - --- - - -- II 11 I: I II l 11 I1 I I; I ' I I I I I; 1 1 I � I� 1J I III II II 1 II I il1 II IIj ij I Ili li I i,"::" ' "\ / vi tier,�' , ,c,r o ��OPUS. r '' %4 :evr ``1'v,„<w• J0A, Atiop a +� y P�F, . Southpointe oJ,. . �\'�'v\?t tre.+t, 1 t�s e'.j'-`i. ,.N:,rC��, st\� �?4• Corporate Center e`+< '.-a „ , N.et - i • ��s 4, �`1,v,xters4 `` Renton,WA • .yNe ,� A a August 3,2000 .,-,r, G*40,,:,-, --- ; v,,--4,o.,IN-14, ,g4..,,,gy. „..7 -4., �// ,i 1 e-.Y:nenm[f43(rRADY WAY yW •A�•A� A. -,0",,.1..., v:' \ ,,,' •N.' . 4400.V. .°,- s°, ,S,.61 ,,,, ,..,. ••,,,,.4.../7 /, \ ,,, \ ,ac‘,-.., , . #41*A;' ;,.../-N .!'" • ,�w +TT,..\ .1:2 ?`d /•- .,.......». a �� - ,fit : y C.V. r ,*, , 4 f' 4? 1..P"1__.-01 • 0 150 300 600 0OP,1 S. A Development IN Opus NOMeest LLC Vicinity Map 1 l• 4102===21'n_,g;',i I, • .... • a 0 CITY OF RENTON , ft..... T r -.4„...4reritfrizra-A.,,i'..0_,.... ,,,' 'AIL • Planning/Building/Public Works )..... 'IC CIC -"11 ike f;re.. E 0 3 0 0 0 004.4 4% 1055 South Grady Way-- Renton Washington 98055 Ca I-. SEP 2 0'0 0 ArCX.M.1 .... 1 c. ‘3, PBmarEn : ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED .., I. ac .vt. a.l. .L.,salg140/1 . S• T E P . c 4 \-, . • (C-.. • . \.-- •.-.‘ .\--...:\ - . --•,.. • RICHARD(TR)REIMAN • (._ 1 912 NE 113TH-AVE n_._._•....k• BELLEVUE WA 98004-3231 • c::.--;.--:.:% ..,- . , - . .. _ . -_-_-_-___. . ..-___. _—_. , L ---4 I NO,SUGiii,.,,T .... ----------, il i /' ' ''NJ'. 'I . . , '1,4 J.,..)u,,,:4 1--1 ici,:-I ss,-,4 , • 1 fai • .. .c.-...... 1 N .-i i `-'•-• (:..1• .Z • A OD BESS.'-:':•i! I 1 CO 'c; -:?. ,1-1.-.; -. • . ,Q, - . II 1\,uiii,...,-41t,. . -... a°1214X1fid4;5. : • 111 .4111 ii ii iii . ' t; I RE-FIRM-Li UNDER R :... ' • • '6:9 .:31,,A.,--,..10,.i 71,2.,:a, 1 '"- 1 iiiiiiiiiiiittuffilutilwilii . • TY • c.)• WNITL� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 19,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner • Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the demolition of the existing structures would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations • in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods forthe project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of.the Threshold Determination of Non- .Signifi_cance:Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow.the issuance,of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use Permit,Additional Height Request,Parking Modification Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 7,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated as Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map. These designations provide for a variety of retail and personal/professional services primarily oriented towards major arterial streets. The proposed office development and separate retail pad is consistent with both of these land use designations. Environmental Documents that . Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation:. •-,,The project will be•subject to.the City'ssSEPA'Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,'Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction.. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 3,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on November 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION d 0 OPUS. T * \ i%., <�,�`yo y°�`'•G;%*e�/e.,"D, �)�`. �Y� Southpointe 4.5 �,•�, �Air;- C��,�—� �vA y,+r1,4' `�+ Corporate Center • +.• f'' tt 4v< • . -;,, •'rf�•.-4%• ,,fQ ,' nw i::wo�ao � ' • /�°�` " rcz. xr . ?' / ii,e . puor war � 00/ 4/ N, Ne. */ *NA- Arit'AN:/.4110:1 :.,", ,11,lit"' -,,.''''''''''C 44:'sr 444:W' I ,l\•�r / / •_-..,_ � Q\, ••ice\ ,•• �;..�4 f�` ,yl_/'�f fr 0 .1; 4;4 1 •/ /. / < �,,�ooa i ,, \ \\=,s��,•_? ,? S i, °, ti • r1__r—� a OPUS. a b • d0eui��� Vicinity Map .... • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION p CITY OF RENTON ri's "`1 `x _. oil/ Planning/Building/Public Works ®®p 04.1 1055 South GradyWayRenton Washington 98055 fo2®cc" SEP 2 0'0 0 0e= �1 ' .a ,3 0 5 ' 9 ItuY �j}}n(� f � ��r ! B METER ; ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED '.-gio.,5 1: R Et , _ k igil f V0i 4�E,s•,., , T _ 9..a s F„a TAMMY S.TIMM I WILLIAMS AVE S#A 1`% , RENTON WA 98055 l ,V �", , .A 't' '^',3 1 .1. "y l � Q:e- -,•� 1lth il'Diliiliitilitiitiitiii{il 1 1t1 �1 1 11 1 I' I) 1 l l 1 I 1 11 1 • • ''3 "-ISIS/7:.....•�.... t m i tit! iii t :tl iit i i i i) Ili iti I a. emu • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 19,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A•office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the demolition of the existing structures would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways,including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the•Optional DNS,M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to.be issued. Comment periods'forr the project:and the,proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single['• comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION;DATE:', September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000, Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use Permit,Additional Height Request,Parking Modification Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 7,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land;Use: The subject site is designated as Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map. These designations provide for a variety of retail and personal/professional services primarily oriented towards major arterial streets. The proposed office development and separate retail pad is consistent with both of these land use designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. Development Regulations • Used.For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SERA Ordinance,Zoning Code;Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code Uniform.Fire.Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction.. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 3,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on November 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION .' " P 6..� i 'r. \' /�4`" <f ,; `S�`' 'al y�'@��,���4, rc.. Sou hpo n ey.. ��b,. F `C��. ii' OPUS. to •'. / ,.` �', 4�' . .' , ••.:� �e�r�,�. 's9 Corporate Center 400. Ron.WA Ze S. '.!f• ..'' ..„. NV., ,,,• '0 -'. AW Ate* Xte41/ 0 /wpm],2000 :.4,,.. '' . *0)SVAtt's (*'44. / 4, ,c f .41P ,s,.,,:: , „ 4.! ...72... Aik\*V.,/,, ,..>:44,41,:t• ,V....t, '',Po.Z,.. .v4.14.4*,, Ilr g r._'7, • -e Ate'• •,4 t n fi� 1 r ('�'.'� '�S r`jot,44.-6, i •".#0, 1/)//eV'-!7'414\\*\1\.,0 \ II''#47 4,p*"' 7 Nyrrwir ---r\ ---\ l`se -x/VAPI..r:AFAir.''IrVo. • l� 3 opus damn .,� o ap • V amry Map NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION . I7 L. r _ 0 p CITY OF RENTON 0 A`® Planning/Building/Public Works �� 0 ( SEP 2 0'0 0 en � °t „ 0 ,.3 ® 5 . ; • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 w � ` pp ,: c c4 PD METER { ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED �`� .,�. _#. �,. �n�l qp S. P Y CE '. .i ,c, WESTERN INC —_ `• 4' pUGET ` SUITE 310 98011 BOTHELL WA _ ;'.<.a IE ' iC EN --. 7 'vC > cap' y LiJzz U SiDi �-�-� 1 j l S1 i 1 I!. 1 It I ! 1 Iiii iilii [ 4 ili ii ! !#! !! i:� q,L d 1 k', • . O _ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 19,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLIICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the demolition of the existing structures would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one'on South Grady Way. The development of the site would requiee the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations • in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the-project and the•proposed DNS`M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the'issuance"of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS=M). A 14-day appeal period will'folloWthe issuance of•the-DNS-M:` '. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use Permit,Additional Height Request,Parking Modification Other:Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUB LIIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 7,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated as Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map. These designations provide for a variety of retail and personal/professional services primarily oriented towards major arterial streets. The proposed office development and separate retail pad is consistent with both of these land use designations. Environmental Documents that.: Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. Development Regulations Used F.or Project `;• . : ::The'project will be subject to'the City's'SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public s;.' •_• -- '-Works Standards;Uniform'Building`Code,Uniform Fire Code and other` ` ``',applicable codes and regulations as appropriate:`-� • � • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 3,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on November 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION i • • "%•4N0 ,, XS o7 �,... 6 OPUS. r ' 0 e / 004e, ,v,v 94,, „ `� t, So hpoi nte j , ` �OV bv ,,,,,,,At �a � �J Corporate Center .. IeAt.:p , y t - 4:& (414?.. 4:,...tit.. ,, 440- !ley 4 P.m WA ',- - . -- -- - -„,_. / to,,,,,t- / i . ,--- ow',..., /.w �Q4V 'Z'infe," O�. .V., *///` tiitte",S: ntiedid' AV A . 1 X• "epAeF'r 4.>jr "'-i'c'4' 1 .:',,,e , 4*,,,---,-\ Q\fr .\- ,,,..., , :,26,;41.4t,„48, , ., , „ v. „th, , 0 ca.,i 5. w,A'\ vAiveAEFA.,;•s,‘.; $OPUS. •u+w�...om.;......0 4icsnrly Map o n 2. w NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION W.' -iNfillywRilliP"'-'"'"°' . . . lop,mpr- wit' _ . .21111111111.011. . _ • , a 0 CITY OF- IZENALON ;Al lb au. Planning/Building/Public Works '1.- . - il:c (3 • a •• SEP 2,0!0 0 rsli.*V4t - 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 lb 1-4 lb CA ' ''.. —ermr2 — kit PG METEn t• 1 • ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 0,-0.• ri t .4-0. ...-- - org.Z0;400 •8., T • E '.1.-$: •;,- ,... ...:- . -,::t..--, BENJAMIN M.8,-,PATRIOMIZINEOW 4310 NE-5TH ST-AFTB10-4: , _ _ .1 RENTON WA-98059-4764 ii ri i',) <------7-1:::-.;-1----,, i! , /1" uo-c' :\ •,;.: . • TO ‘,/,./p,1 Tr p,,'",----.:' - 1! c::'; .:,•?, '‘).i ADDRESS • ADRE . . --- - • iLiii\oik.., Yv 6,4 1 . •\\e„:,_ S eik..i ..,IS'e .:.',4.. 2. • . III is iiiillissiliiiiiiiii-idisisiiiiiiiissiiiiiiiiiiiiissiiii Y O • ST O • NOTICE OF APPLICATION • AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON • - SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 19,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner • Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities,'landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the demolition of the existing structures would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations • in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and,the proposed_DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period_following the.issuance.of,the_Threshold Determination of;Non- Significance Mitigated;(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the.issuance of the DNS-M.. `PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use Permit,Additional Height Request,Parking Modification . Other permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 7,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated as Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map. These designations provide for a variety of retail and personal/professional services primarily oriented towards major arterial streets. The proposed office development and separate retail pad is consistent with both of these land use designations. Environmental Documents that. Evaluate the Proposed Project: ' None. DeveloPment'Regulations - Used For Project Mitigation:.•. . The-project,will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public • .' 'Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,;Uniform Fire Code and other.' applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. • ;.:;:':.:.; NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION • Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction.. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 3,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on November 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION •it 2'' \ram ) 95 '0,`•6`,t. "St. ,4 €# �- 4 OPUS. I outhpoi n e •.. • oij � - , � Corporate Center •,j • 409E 4.y `+ 44# ewblWR �r \\. �4� . . 0mil ap r . IMIMIIIIII � ,„<< 4, n ,� a !moo � � �.�; ' �0`? „..N , l*.' :: .. mtt,,.4-// 444, 4 4 -..., 11. / -v.* . << +. ,\ \ ! 91 \_,,,z ../ : ....4,*7 Ae; • :,,,,,yes"ratillim bv.rit.**1\ S.M.', ,v4a.,044- .._,k,.....Asz � \r r �Op0 ,'�4 / e! i�P� —C'i <G ,1. s ., /n .�,• .--7 r—t 00 0 OPUS. .a-�..do>...e....LW 1 ,0 . YavJy Map • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION • a 0, CITY OF RENTON mew T r:. .13V,44 g • 'Ai 473 c„. • Planning/Building/Public Works cc .1 P C.11 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 u31-- cd) 2 6 ",EP : 0 corrgs-;-.6 PB-F4 t — ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 1111A0t " *.k ts, $.114 w: 5. 5.-T.. • • A..2'. H . • • l( ri • • I • f ; C. • )0R _ _ • _ , • • Y O NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 19,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner • Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the demolition of the existing structures would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations • in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton.is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-Mare integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following;the issuance:of the.Threshold Determination:of Non-. ... Significance Mitigated'(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the`issuance of the DNS-M. PERMITAPPLICATION DATE:.. September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use • • Permit,Additional Height Request,Parking Modification OtheriPermits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for November 7,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated as Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)on the City's Zoning Map. These designations provide for a variety of retail and personal/professional services primarily oriented towards major arterial streets. The proposed office development and separate retail pad is consistent with both of these land use designations. Environmental Documents that `" Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. . Development Regulations Used!For,Project Mitigation: . The;project will'be subjectto�the,City's;SEPA;Ordinance,Zoning,Code,Public Works.Standards,Uniform.Building Code,Uniform Fire Code_end other • ; applicable;codes and regulations as.appropriate. _ _ NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction.. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 3,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on November 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 1' ) , ��*V ,��'" J��+XSY a rt�� ,�' �a OPUS. Z4`t 'ic04, ' r `•�' /••"t. 4714- �.. Southpointe / / 41 �' c°'wf° '� 4. *—A- �' s, Corporate Center A7e/rt> '. 1. ,gyp t''Iph':.'' q' At'.itt . ‘4447.4...%$,4 'Av:iy• .' • :�* d'��; ��r` \ �o�c°?+ wit .,. Y\./- 6 4 4v ilpg ,. \ v' Fes✓ 6► . o I / 4 8 A., .4k., At.A. I �Q��* ►-,'�'` \ill \ ' ' 3 , x ,/„. „..,.,, '''47.4ty i 0 OPUS. .y..e,-..a,.,,.,,ma • Vk lly May 1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION 20010213001445 CITY OF RENTON EAS OF 0 16.00 PAGE 3//20011 1 :40 A er Recording Return to: KING COUNTY, WA City Clerk!ts Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Document Title or Titles: Declaration of Easements For Southpointe Office Park Reference Nos. of Documents Assigned or Released: None Name of Grantor: Puget Western, Inc., a Washington corporation. Name of Grantee: All current and future owners of real property located in Blocks 1-2, Walsworth's First Add., Vol. 6, P. 23 & Lots B & D, LLA LUA-98-164-LLA, Rec. 9812109014, & Ptn of `c') NE1/419-23-05. C`J C� I Abbreviated Legal Description: Blocks 1-2, Walsworth's First Add., Vol. 6, P. 23 & Lots B &D, LLA LUA-98-164-LLA, Rec. 9812109014, & Ptn of NE% 19-23-05. Additional Legal Description Found On: Page 9. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Number or Account Number: 915460-0010-00, 192305-9099, 202305-9007-08, & 202305-9008-07. • 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB I , DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SOUTHPOINTE OFFICE PARK ARTICLE I DECLARATION This Declaration is made on the date hereinafter set forth by Puget Western, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Declarant"), which is the owner of all that certain real property located in Renton, Washington, commonly known as Southpointe Office Park and described on Exhibit A (the "Park"). All of the real property within the Park shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the easements, set forth in this Declaration (collectively, the "Easements"). Such Easements shall benefit the Park and are for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Park and each of the Lots (defined below) located therein. Declarant reserves the right to initiate any and all studies, sign any and all agreements, and otherwise take actions necessary to satisfy any requirements of the City of Renton. ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Declaration, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: CS 2.1 "City" — shall mean the City of Renton in King County, Washington, and/or any other governmental entity with jurisdiction over the Park. CV 2.2 "Declaration" —shall mean this Declaration of Easements for Southpointe Office Park as it may be amended from time to time. CD ram' 2.3 "Declarant"=shall mean Puget Western, Inc., a Washington corporation. 2.4 "Improvement" — shall mean any building, sign, parking area, road, driveway, sidewalk, curb, ramp, utility facility, storm water drainage facilities or irrigation system, screening or retaining wall, barrier, or fence, planted tree, shrub or other plant, light, and any other permanent structure now or hereafter constructed or placed in, on or under the surface of the Park. 2.5 "Lot" — shall mean each of Lot 1 through Lot 4 of the Lot Line Adjustment. 2.6 "Lot Line Adjustment" — shall mean the City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment number LUA 99-153. 2 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC 2.7 "Mortgagee" — shall mean the beneficial owner of any encumbrance created by a Mortgage and, in the case of a sale and leaseback, the leaseback lessor. 2.8 "Occupant" — shall mean a lessee or licensee of an Owner or any other Person other than an Owner in lawful possession of a Lot with the permission of the Owner. 2.9 "Owner" — shall mean any Person who is record owner of fee simple title to any Lot, including Declarant, excluding any Person who holds such interest as security for the payment of any obligation, but including contract sellers and any Mortgagee in actual possession of a Lot. 2.10 "Park" — shall mean the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2.11 "Permitees" — shall mean all Occupants and their respective officers, directors, members, managers, employees, agents, contractors, customers and invitees, to the extent that their activities relate to the intended use of the Lots. 2.12 "Person" — shall mean any individual, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, trust or other form of business or governmental entity. 2.13 "Record", "Recorded", "Recording" or "Recordation" - shall mean with respect to any document, the filing for record of said document with the real property o records of King County, Washington,Department of Records and Elections. C ARTICLE III RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS 3.1 Access Easements. Declarant on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby reserves, establishes and grants for the benefit of each of the Lots and their Owners, Occupants and Permittees, an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, appurtenant easement, over and across the areas of ingress and egress, driveways, sidewalks and other vehicular and pedestrian ways located upon the Lots, as the same may from time to time be constructed and maintained, for pedestrian and vehicular ingress,and egress to and from the Lots. 3 51225\03919\215926.V 01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC 3.2 Parking Easements. Declarant, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby reserves, establishes and grants for the benefit of each of the Lots and their Owners, Occupants and Permittees, an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, appurtenant easement, over and across the parking areas located upon the Lots, as the same may from time to time be constructed and maintained, for the purpose of parking in certain parking areas within the Park. Notwithstanding that, as a result of the easements established in this Section 3.2, parking on the Lots is shared, except as otherwise specifically agreed in a Recorded instrument by and between any two or more Lot Owners: (a) no Lot Owner shall use, or promise the Occupants and/or Permittees of its Lot that they may use, in the aggregate, more parking spaces than the number that are located on that Owner's Lot and adjacent parking stalls to allow up to four (4) stalls per 1,000 net rentable square feet and (b) each Owner shall use its best reasonable efforts to cause Occupants and Permittees of its Lot to park in the parking spaces located on its own Lot. 3.3 Utility Easements. Declarant, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby reserves, establishes and grants for the benefit of each of the Lots and their Owners, Occupants and Permittees, irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, appurtenant easements for the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair v1- and replacement of utilities serving the Improvements located or to be located on the Lots, including water, gas, telephone, electricity, sewers and storm drains over, under, CZI across and through (a) any easement areas created by Declarant in any utility easement cn agreement(s) and (b) as to any utilities initially constructed that are located within the Park, at the location at which such utilities are initially constructed. If any utility easements are created at the as-built location of the utility, the Declarant, may (and, upon written request from the user of such utility, shall) either (i) Record an amendment to this Declaration or (ii) Record a separate easement declaration that specifies the legal description of the location of such utility easement. 3.4 Cooperation. Any Lot Owner that desires to enter onto another Lot ("Entering Lot Owner") in the exercise of its rights under Section 3.3 shall give the Owner of the Lot to be entered (the "Entered Lot") reasonable written notice before entering the Entered Lot, if the Entering Lot Owner's activities might impact the operation of the facilities or business on the Entered Lot. The Entering Lot Owner shall coordinate its activities with the Entered Lot Owner so as to cause minimum disruption to the operation of the facilities and business on the Entered Lot and shall cause its contractor or contractors to conform to all reasonable requests from the Entered Lot Owner.regarding minimization of such interference. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 3.4, in an emergency, the Entering Lot Owner shall notify the Entered Lot Owner of its entry as soon as reasonably possible. In exercising its rights under Section 3.3, the Entering Lot Owner shall use all reasonable measures to prevent 4 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC damage to the Improvements located upon the Entered Lot and shall restore any damaged Improvements as nearly as possible to the condition they were in immediately before the entry. All restoration shall be performed as soon as reasonably possible following completion of any work and shall be coordinated in advance with the Entered Lot Owner to minimize disruption to the operation of the facilities and business on the Entered Lot. 3.5 Liens and Indemnity. The Entering Lot Owner shall defend and indemnify the Entered Lot Owner against any and all claims, costs, liabilities and damages arising out of the exercise of its right under Section 3.3 (including Attorneys' Fees incurred in the investigation or defense of such actions). If any mechanic's, materialmen's or other lien is asserted against the Entered Lot as a result of the Entering Lot Owner's exercise of its rights under Section 3.3, within ten (10) days after written request from the Entered Lot Owner, the Entering Lot Owner shall cause such lien to be released and discharged of Record, either by paying the indebtedness which gave rise to such lien or by posting bond or other security as shall be required by law to obtain such release and discharge. In any case, the Entering Lot Owner shall cause such lien to be discharged prior to entry of final judgment for the foreclosure of such lien. The Entering Lot Owner shall defend and indemnify the Entered Lot Owner to the same extent as set forth in the first sentence of this Section 3.5 on account of such claim or lien. � I ARTICLE IV CZ) AMENDMENT AND REPEAL �-- 4.1 By Lot Owners. Except as specifically provided otherwise in this Article IV, this Declaration may be terminated or amended only by a Recorded written instrument executed and acknowledged by the Owners of Lots containing not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the gross leaseable area of all buildings located within the c' Park. Notwithstanding the preceding, the easements created by Article III may not be terminated or modified without the written consent of all Lot Owners and, if required, by the City. 4.2 By y Declarant. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Declaration, as long as Declarant owns at least one Lot, Declarant may alone amend any section of this Declaration provided that: (a)prior to any such modification or amendment, Declarant obtains the approval of the City; (b) any amendment shall not permit any type of improvements or use which is specifically prohibited by this Declaration; (c) such amendment shall not impose additional monetary obligations upon any Owner, unless required by the City; and (d) the provisions of Article III are not terminated. 5 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC 4.3 All Amendments. No amendment may contravene any valid and applicable federal, state or local law, ordinance, rule or regulation. Any amendment shall be effective only after (i) all affected Owners have been given thirty (30) day's prior written notice of any proposed change, and (ii) a written instrument, executed and acknowledged by the required Owners, has been Recorded in the real property records of King County, Washington. - ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS 5.1 Term. The easements created by Article III shall be perpetual. All other provisions of the Declaration shall also be perpetual, unless they are terminated pursuant to Article IV. 5.2. Notice. All notices, demands, requests and other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be deemed delivered on the earlier of (i) three (3) business days after posting of registered or certified mail, addressed to the Lot Owner at the address of the Lot owned by such Lot Owner, or at such other address as such party may have specified to the others in writing, or (ii) actual receipt by the addressee, which may be by (a) personal service, or (b) overnight courier if the courier service provides a signed receipt showing actual delivery. 5.13. Attorneys' Fee. In the event of any litigation or other proceeding to m enforce any provision of this Declaration,the prevailing party shall recover from the non- prevailing party all costs, damages and expenses, including attorneys', paralegals', clerical and consultants' fees, and charges actually expended or incurred in connection therewith, including for appeals or any bankruptcy proceeding (collectively, "Attorneys' Fees"). 5.14 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. It is, by the Recording of this Declaration, considered that every Person who now or hereafter owns, occupies, leases, possesses or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Park has consented and agreed to every term, condition, and easement contained in this Declaration. 6 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Declarant has executed this Declaration this Q Aid day of February, 2001. DECLARANT Puget Western, Inc., a Washington corporation By: Aq419 Title: President © I r 7 I- � � r cD 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. On this Z day of February, 2001, before me personally appeared R. B. Boyd, to me known to be President of Puget Western, Inc., a Washington corporation,the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • (6--4°4 02-- IE� ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ?�J`J�141'' n /4. /� residing at CL,n4-�>"/ c� 0ti My commission expires: #t i /� ZVVZ NQTAR y E,2i� .Svi1/ ' "t" = [Type or Print Notary Name] • PUBLIC • 14 cv zOI11 i110'```` (Use This Space for Notarial Seal Stamp) 8 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC r EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SOUTHPOINTE OFFICE PARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION All those portions of Blocks 1 and 2, including the unnumbered tracts adjoining the lots in Block 1, Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, Records of King County, Washington, lying Southerly of South Grady Way and Northeasterly of Talbot Road South; TOGETHER WITH those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South 8th Avenue vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2850, which attached thereto by operation of law; TOGETHER WITH Revised Parcels "B and D" of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-98-164-LLA as recorded under Recording No. 9812109014, Records of King CD County, Washington; and m TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in KingCounty, lying g tY, WashingtonY� g Easterly of Talbot Road South and lying Northerly of Primary State Highway No. 1, as deeded to the State of Washington by Quit Claim Deed recorded June 26, 1964 under Recording Number 5754046. ALSO KNOWN AS "Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 -of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment number LUA 99-153, situate in King County, Washington." 9 51225\03919\215926.V01 BLB CC&R's-Esmt Only 01292001.DOC C'ITSi `)F RENTON .,eitIL Hearing.Examiner i. Jesse Tanner,Mayor : Fred J.Kaufman.- January 25;2001.- • • PJ Santos OPUS Northwest • 915— 118th Avenue SE. Bellevue,WA 98055: . Re: Southpointe Development Project File No. LUA00-124,CU,ECF,SA • Dear Mr. Santos: _ . • It appears that the appeal period has expired and the file on this project is to be transmitted to the City Clerk-for.filing. This office would like to make sure thatrthe decision and"conditions for this matter are clear. • This office had reconsidered theorigiiialdecisibri and conditions and offered to'alter them if certain assurances were received regarding the safety of making left turn maneuvers to or from the subject site. The parties were given thirty(30)"days to respond. This office did not receive the necessary;written:confirmation from the Transportation Division that the driveway and turning;movements.would_be safe,and efficient,nor did this office receive a confirmation from the applicant that imdemnification for possible accidents was acceptable. This means that the record is left with the fact;thkallowing:left:turnrns into or:out of the subject driveway would create a dangerous;situation of Talbot;Road. Therefore the original decision and • conditions stand,and those=suggested in the letter reconsidering.the original decision and • conditions are null and voids-J, . - Please feel free to contact this office'.if further>assistance or information is required.. • Sincerely, • , Fred J:Kaufman . Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Mayor.Jesse.Tanner Jay Covington;Chief Administrative Officer -.Larry Warren,City Attorney • Neil Watts,Development Services • Lesley Nishihira,Development Services - Sandi Seeger,Development Services _j5 r -. �901�2®mil : 1055 South_Grady..Way Renton;'Washington 98055 (425) 430-6515 k :, : . • ' :: � This - percontains50%recycledinatenal'20%post onsumer: lie : _ _ ,� y ...,. �r CIT'. 'OF RENTON V. Hearing Examiner• , Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman • December 15,2000 Mr.Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division City of Renton City Hall, 6th floor 1055.S Grady Way. Renton,WA 98055 RE: Report and Decision for Southpointe Development Project File No.LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF This office has reviewed your request for reconsideration in this matter and the response follows. The request states that after discussions between-Transportation Services Division personnel, Development Services personnel and the applicant, a revised condition was proposed. The complete record in thismatter, including specific testimony at the Hearing, indicates that the Transportation Services:Division concluded.that the proposed "all traffic movements" driveway along.Talbot would create an unsafe;turning"situation. That division made a particular point of modifying its original determination::;The original recommendation indicated that left-in and left-out turns could be accommodated from oie:of two proposed:driveways. Their changed recommendation based on safety was to,allowonly right-in/right-out turns along any of the , Talbot frontage. This office finds the proposed,change.unacceptable with the current state of the record. There is nothing in the record to support the proposed;change,and it presents a dramatic change from the existing record. There is no evidence_to allow the"'condition to be altered. Therefore,this office would be willing to"alter the condition subject to receiving explicit written documentation signed by a licensed transportation engineer of the City that the "all traffic • movements" driveway proposed along Talbot Road is a safe and effective.driveway. The condition would further explicitly state that the City, in its sole discretion,may close the driveway to left-in/left-out turning movements. This provides clear evidence that the applicant is aware that the driveway may be restricted by the City at any time, and that the applicant accepts such possible restrictions at this time. Finally,the applicant shall agree,by written binding document acceptable to the City Attorney,to be responsible for any injuries or pro perry."damage that results from any left-turning movements at this driveway location: Again,the current record appears to indicate that permitting left-in/left-out turning movements " • . Would be unsafe along the Talbot frontage, and this office is reluctant to approve a proposal that 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055. (425)430=6515 : Neil Watts LUA=00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF Page Two could create a hazard to life or property.'If the record is supplemented as noted above,then it • would appear that the proposed driveway can be unrestricted at this time. • Therefore, Condition Number 2 shall be changed to read as follows: 2. An all turning movements driveway permitting both left-in and left-out turns as well as right-in arid right-out turns may be permitted along the Talbot.Road frontage if: a. The City's licensed Transportation or Traffic Engineer provides a written document to this office within 20 days stating that such a driveway would be safe. b. The City in its sole discretion may at anytime restrict the driveway to right-in and right-out turning movements and'prohibit any other turning movements at that driveway. c. The applicant..;shall;agree,by:"written binding document acceptable to the City Attorney to be`financially responsible for any injuries.}or property damage that results from any left-turning movements at this driveway location and shall hold the City harmless in the event of:such accident. If this office can be of any further assistance,please:feel.free to:write.. Sincerely, Fred J.Kau an Hearing Examiner FJK:jt, cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner : Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer • . Larry Warren,City Attorney.- • Lesley Nishihira . Parties of Record CITE. OF RENTON ,.LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department :. Jesse Tanner;Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator. • -Decernber 8, 2000 i . Mr: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton City Hall, 7th floor - " 1055 Grady Way. • Renton,WA 98055 Subject: " Report and Decision for Southpointe Development Project File No..LUA-00-i24,SA-H, CU-H, ECF Dear Mr. Kaufman: This letter is written to request a RECONSIDERATION of condition no. 2 of the decision issued for the above referenced project. In your Report,and Decision of November.27, 2000,the • following condition of approval was made: "2.- The applicant shall install a traffic curb adjacent to both driveways on Talbot. Road in order toprevent'motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Road. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Services Division prior to the`:issuance of building or construction permits for the development project." After discussions with both the Transportation"Services Division and.the applicant, the Development Services Division is proposing revised language for;this;:condition: All parties have agreed that the proposed condition would be the most appropriate and`acceptable solution to address access issues on the west'side'of tle".properly(off of Talbot Road South). In addition, section 4-4-080.1.1. Driveway Design Standards", authorizes the City to remedy future problems which may arise from hazards potentially with the turning:movements and/or the location of the subject driveway if they found"to exist: The Development Services Division hereby requestsi,".the revision of this;condition to read as follows: • "2. The applicant shall install a single driveway.,location,on Talbot Road South,which allows all traffic movements in and out of this driveway. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division.priorto the issuance of building or construction:permits for the development project" Thank you for your reconsideration of this matter. Sincerely, EMEodr • .Neil Watts,Director. DEC i4� Development Services Division Cc: P.J.Santos/OPUS.Northwest;applicant '•_ `'` CITYOF.RENTON ,.. R.B. Boyd/Puget Western;owner .. .: . HEARING EXAMINER. Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator • Sue Carlson, EDNSP Administrator •• - " Jennifer Henning, Principle Planner Lesley Nishihira;Project Manager : Nick Afzali,Transportation Planning Supervisor • I , 1055 South.Grady Way.-Renton,Washington,98055 .. 0---- , CITE F RENTON .e ' . Planning/.Building/Public Works Department ' Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,.Administrator December 8, 2000 Mr. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner - - City of Renton City Hall, 7th floor • - 1055 Grady Way - Renton,WA 98055 .. Subject: Report and.Decision for Southpointe Development Project . File No: LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H, ECF 2, 1 ; Dear.Mr. Kaufman: • ' This letter is written to:request a RECONSIDERATION of condition no. 2 of the decision issued - for the above referenced project. In your Report,and Decision of.November 27, 2000,the ' - following condition of approval was made:.' 1 ` ' , "2. The applicant shall install a traffic,cUrb adjacent to both driveways on Talbot Road in order to,prevent motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Road: The - ' satisfaction of this requirement'shall be subject to the review and approval of the r ; •Transportation Services Division prior to the issuance of building or construction permits.for:the development project." ' , , After discussions with both the Transportation Services Division,and the applicant, the Development Services Division is proposing revised language for this,condition:: All parties have agreed that the proposed condition would be the most appropriate and acceptable solution to address access issues on the west side of the property(off of Talbot Road South)...In addition, - section 4-4-080.1.1."Driveway Design Standards'; authorizes the City to remedy future problems - . which may arise from hazards potentially associated with the turning movements and/or the 1. location of the'subject driveway if they are-found to exist. - The Development Services Division hereby requests the revision of this condition to read as follows: "2. ' ", The applicant shall install asingle driveway location on Talbot.Road,South, which a , allows all traffic movements in_and:out of this driveway. The satisfaction of this • requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development ,' t Services-Division prior the issuance of building or construction permits for the • development project." • _ Thank you for your reconsideration of this matter. ' . • Sincerely, is e: ecel; =:-,:: , .D EE M 0d ;E ii Neil Watts, Director DEC rill l 2000 ' Development Services Division s , 't , cc: P.J.Santos/OPUS Northwest,'applicant z:, :; CITY RENTON HEARINGOf EXAMINER "^: '- R.B. Boyd/Puget Western,owner Gregg Zimmerman, P/B/PW Administrator ,. Sue Carlson, EDNSP Administrator. - • - Jennifer Henning, Principle Planner Lesley,Nishihira;".Project Manager • Nick Afzali,Transportation Planning Supervisor . ' 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer fi* CITY F RENTON ..IL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON November 30, 2000 NOV 3 0 2000 PJ Santos RECEIVED OPUS Northwest 915— 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 Subject: Modification Request- Southpointe Project 915 South Grady Way(LUA-00-124) Dear Mr. Santos: We have reviewed your request for a modification of street improvements along Benson Road S adjacent to your proposed development. After review of your letter, the proposed site plan and the City Code,we have determined that this modification can be approved. It should be noted that no other modifications from the standard street improvements adjacent to the project are being requested. Concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks to City standards are currently in place along the other two street frontages. Street lighting is also in place along all three adjacent street frontages. Street improvement requirements for new developments can be modified by the City if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. In order for a modification to be approved, the City must, "find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modification: (1)Will meet the objectives of safety, function, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the requirements of this Ordinance,based upon sound engineering judgment, (2) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity." Your modification request stated the following reasons for removing the requirement for new curb, gutter and sidewalks along the project frontage on Benson Road S: 1. An elevation change of over 30 feet exists between Benson Road and our proposed development. This sectional change creates a strong disconnect between the two areas. 2. No portion of the improvements designed for Opus Southpointe will abut Benson Road. Our design leaves a tree/land buffer ranging from 50 to 200 feet in width along the southeast property line. We agree that the steep topography along Benson Road S., along with the physical disconnect between the proposed development and the street justify the granting of the requested modification. The additional street improvements proposed along Talbot Road S. are also additional justification for the requested street improvement modification. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 PJ Santos November 30,2000 Page 2 The street improvement requirements for the Southpointe project located at 915 S. Grady Way are modified as follows: 1. New sidewalks and landscaping shall be installed along the S. Grady Way frontage as shown on the approved site plan. These frontage improvements are to be comparable in design to the existing improvements east of the development site. 2. A new traffic signal is to be installed at the intersection of Williams Avenue S. and S. Grady Way at the entrance to the development site. The City will pay for 75% of the construction cost of this signal through reduction of the traffic mitigation fees for the development. 3. No new street improvements are required along the frontages of Talbot Road S. or Benson Road S. If you have further questions regarding this modification request,please call Arneta Henninger at (425)430-7298. Sincerely, Aw aid/ Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division cc: Arneta Henninger,Engineering Specialist Leslie Nishihira,Assistant Planner' CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of 1IOIr xy,Q, , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing R�ovl3 0-tGIF -tea101 x,I.,wkdocuments. This information was sent to: Name Representing 1z, 3 F3°T 7f u�rj saw-tos Os ba_vid Jacks -v (Signature of Sender) Salo STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that r\rc. ?k se.€1 e r signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for/the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date. 1 ; l(o ,ir,_• ) )-) mac_ �1C C .� MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary Public in/and for the State of Was ' gton NOTARY PUBLIC 303 STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print)-:'VN ►44MCiHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment expires rvrExPtRES:6.2 JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: Sautirlpoun{-e_. laeelorl/v\et Project Number: LUA -OO- 124 a), Sp , NOrARY2.DOC 1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) Joan Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 27th day of November ,2000, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: � --� SUBKC� 1'VA,1 D SWORN to before me this,7 ' (�day of� ve,te ,-2000. z \uo4,1-47,4 z N �o yj' w' u Not blic in ansl,for the State of Washington, 7S '%v r oc_= �; residing at Se GC-fti , therein. y Applicaaidh;Mition, or Case No.: Southpointe LUA-00-124,S A-H,CU-H,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. ' --c - �''.<`:: - - - -•gips - �,rj.', .• kG - •y - 4 g.Y( • ; 3 � 5 , er- 'S: •4 :Yf' afa r _ .y "� j • • y, rr "r Pµn,� �1. ( • i, f4d. s, +:'rat t � Sr wr .is. Jqu +,• ,4 tfi M1 • },,k' - • yw - ..y S ..N.�'t .X �,5 ...( -` i •,art t7i ,t (°' d t - .((• • • . - . . ''. !i•`,✓.• rt ++fit t .' :/_I •;'11 • • to x re* 'os'i •• •1.1 HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT ' tY f_ y November 27, 2000 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest,LLC P.J. Santos File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF LOCATION: 915 South Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Construction of two,4-story, 145,00 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. Due to the size of the project,Hearing Examiner approval of the site plan is required. In addition,the applicant has included a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which is subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 1,2000 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the November 7,2000 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,November 7,2000,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map l application, proof of posting,proof of publication and i other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Building elevations Exhibit No.5: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 6: Zoning map (Exhibit No.7: Revised site plan Exhibit No. 8: Map with parcel lines OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF j November 27, 2000 Page 2 Exhibit No. 9a: Driveway location 90'west of City Exhibit No. 9b: Driveway location 90'west of City Hall showing Williams as one way street Hall showing Williams as two way street Exhibit No. 9c: Driveway location 115'west of City Exhibit No. 10: Auto Nation site plan Hall showing Williams as two way street Exhibit No. 11: Home Depot site plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by LESLIE NISHIHIRA,Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The subject site is located in the south Renton area,addressed as 915 S Grady Way. The property is bounded by Grady Way on the northwest, Talbot Rd on the west,and Benson Rd S on the southeast. The site is 16 acres in size and is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA). The property was previously reviewed for the Auto Nation development and also for the Home Depot development, which was subsequently withdrawn. The Southpointe proposal would construct two office I buildings and one commercial retail building. The proposed office buildings would have a building footprint of 36,300 square feet. The buildings would be four stories in height with 145,200 gross square feet of office space in each building. The proposed retail pad would be 6,000 gross square feet in size and is proposed at one story. Access to the site would be provided through three driveways,two on Talbot Rd S and one on S Grady Way. The applicant has also requested to exceed the maximum permitted building height in the CA zone,and the additional height request is subject to special Conditional Use Criteria. The project was required to undergo SEPA environmental review and on October 10,200 the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the proposal. They proposed five mitigation measures. The decision was followed by a two-week appeal period,during which no appeals were filed. Ms.Nishihira reviewed the five mitigation measures imposed by the ERC. The applicant is required to comply with recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study submitted with the application. The development is also required to not increase the stormwater release rate above previously developed conditions. The applicant is required to pay the required Traffic and Fire Mitigation Fees. The applicant is required to install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between S Grady Way and Williams Ave S. Ms Nishihira continued by reviewing the proposal's compliance with Site Plan Approval Criteria. The subject site is designated Employment Area- Commercial(EAC). The EAC designation is to "provide for commercial uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic." The proposal is in compliance with this designation. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA) and is also I located within Auto Mall Area B. Professional business offices, as well as retail and commercial uses are considered primary permitted uses in the CA zone. Auto Mall Area B also allows all uses within the underlying i zoning designation as primary permitted uses. The proposal would have a total building footprint area of 78,600 square feet. This would result in a building lot coverage of 11%,which is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 65% in the CA zone. The proposal complies with the required landscape setbacks of the CA zone,which are a 10 foot setback along all arterial street frontages. In addition, a minimum of 5% of the parking area is required to be landscaped. The proposal complies with this requirement as well. Ms.Nishihira continued the proposal's compliance with Site Plan Approval Criteria by stating that building height in the CA zone is limited to a maximum of 50 feet. The proposed four-story office building would arrive at a finished height of approximately 53 feet. Rooftop mechanical screening has typically not been included in the maximum building height for development standards. The screened mechanical equipment would have an !additional height of 12 to 15 feet. The project would provide 1,108 parking spaces including 605 standard stalls. A parking modification was approved in order to allow a reduction in the dimensions of the standard stalls from _t OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27, 2000 Page 3 9 x 20 feet in length to 9 x 18 feet in length. The parking spaces would also include 480 compact stalls,which were also approved to exceed the maximum 30%with that parking modification. Twenty-three ADA accessible stalls will also be provided. With the exception of the modification,the parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle dimensions and ADA accessible stalls. The site consists of four underlying parcels. An application for lot line adjustment was submitted in connection with the Home Depot development and was subsequently withdrawn. The lot line adjustment has been placed on hold and staff recommends as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of building permits,the lot line adjustment be revised to conform with the site plan. The Examiner asked if the lot lines would be dissolved and the site be made one large lot. Ms.Nishihira replied that this would be the applicant's choice. The City would not want buildings to straddle 'property lines. The applicant must either dissolve them completely or configure them in such a way that the buildings would comply with setback, lot coverage and parking requirements. They will have to establish cross- parking agreements, and that will be recorded concurrently with the lot line adjustment. The proposal is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding property and uses. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions would serve to mitigate these potential impacts. The proposal in not anticipated to adversely impact the existing site. The proposal would involve earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The site is currently developed with asphalt concrete pavement and other gravel surface. The project would only slightly increase the amount of impervious surface area. As part of the ERC's imposed mitigation measures,the project shall not increase the stormwater release rate. In order to mitigate potential erosion and slope stability impacts,the applicant is required to comply with recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report, comply with code-adopted measures to have a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control Plan, and to comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The site also contains ll overhead power lines which cross the southern portion of the property. Prior to issuance of building permits, a detailed landscape plan will need to be reviewed to insure that any proposed plantings are not of a type that would grow to a height that might interfere with the overhead lines. The project is anticipated to conserve area- wide property values. The parking plan provides adequate aisle widths and backout distances for safe and efficient circulation of vehicles. The applicant has also proposed substantial street improvements along S Grady Way and Talbot Rd S. These improvements include sidewalks,benches,and landscaping designed to encourage and attract pedestrian usage. Adequate pedestrian connections have also been provided from Talbot and Grady Way to the main entrances of the building. Code requirements also require street improvements on Benson Rd S. The applicant has submitted an application to the Board of Public Works to waive these improvements. The applicant will be required to comply with whatever the Board decides. Three driveway entrances are proposed to the site,two on Talbot Rd S and one on S Grady Way. The northerly driveway on Talbot Rd is proposed at approximately 400 feet south of the Grady Way intersection. The second driveway on Talbot Rd is approximately 760 feet south of that intersection. The northerly driveway is proposed to be limited to right-in/right-out turning operation, and the southern driveway is proposed with full turning movement. Staff has approved these driveway locations subject to Conditions of Approval. Specifically, staff recommends that both driveways be limited to right-in/right-out turning movements. In order to enforce this, the applicant should be required to install a traffic curb within the northerly driveway on Talbot Rd in order to prevent motorists from making left turns. In addition,in order to ensure the driveway does not create adverse impacts in the future, staff recommends that two years after the completion of the project or when 85%of the leasable space is occupied,traffic operations at the northern most Talbot driveway should re-evaluated by the City. If the City determines that an adverse impact on overall traffic safety is likely to occur,the City should be authorized to close this driveway if determined to be necessary. OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27, 2000 Page 4 The driveway proposed to serve the site from S Grady Way was initially found to be unacceptable. After numerous discussions with City staff,the applicant revised the location of this driveway. At this point it is proposed at a distance of 105 feet from the site's north property line. Traffic Operations has reviewed this further and determined that this does not line up in a way that would provide for an efficiently functioning intersection. Traffic Operations has provided the applicant with three alternatives showing where they would approve a driveway location. The analysis of this intersection indicates that there is a need for a traffic signal. As part of the mitigation measures imposed by the ERC,the applicant will be required to install a traffic signal. 1 Specifics of private vs. public cost contributions are yet to be determined. The proposal would provide adequate light and air and is anticipated not to have adverse impacts to noise, odors or other unhealthy conditions. There are sufficient Fire and Police services available to serve the proposed project, subject to the applicant's payment of the required Traffic and Fire Mitigation Fees. Overall,the project is anticipated to improve the appearance of the surrounding area and would prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. Ms.Nishihira continued by summarizing the criteria for additional building height. The project must be within proximity to arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The site is bounded by a principle arterial on the northwest(S Grady Way) and on the west (Talbot Rd S), as well as by a minor arterial on the east(Benson Rd S)--all of which have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. The project would be required to install a traffic signal at the Grady Way and Williams Ave intersection in order to insure a functional safe driveway. The proposal is in compliance with the underlying Comprehensive Plan Employment Area- Commercial designation. The site plan is also consistent with the development standards of the CA zoning designation,with the exception of the requested height. The project complies with the criteria that states that the project shall not result in an over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area. The applicant contends that the additional building height is only necessary to allow each floor to be designed to meet market needs and would not result in additional floors. The proposed office development would include the construction of approximately 290,400 square feet of office space,which would be outright permitted within the CA zone. The additional building height would not increase the overall gross square footage of office space over what would be included if the building were designed within the 50 foot height limitation. The CA zoning designation allows professional business offices as an outright permitted use. The site is surrounded by commercially zoned property and is not subject to additional setback requirements from residentially zoned property. The lot coverage and yard setbacks are in compliance with the requirements of the CA zone. The proposed building is not expected to have substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent properties. As proposed,the building should be consistent with the context established by existing 7-story and 9-story buildings located to the north, including Renton City Hall,and west of the subject including the Renton One, Two and Three office buildings. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with the surrounding and existing character of the neighborhood. Parking,traffic, 'noise and landscaping are all in compliance with the Commercial Arterial zone requirements. The proposal does not include any accessory uses and would not convert any existing buildings. The proposed use and location would be adequately served by existing improvements,provided all conditions of approval and SEPA mitigating measures are complied with. Staff recommends approval of the Southpointe Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. The 'associated lot line adjustment,which must be consistent with the site plan decision, shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the project. 2. The driveways on Talbot Rd shall be limited to right-in/right-out turning movements only. The applicant shall install a traffic curb in order to prevent motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Rd. 3. Two years after the completion of the project or when 85% 'of the retail space is occupied,traffic operations at the northern most Talbot driveway shall be re-evaluated by the City. If the City determines there is an adverse impact,the City shall be authorized to close the driveway if necessary. 4. The driveway entrance on S Grady Way shall be redesigned to achieve the appropriate alignment i OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 5 with Williams Ave, subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division,Traffic Operations Division, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit for additional building height shall be specific to the construction of the approved Southpointe site plan. P.J. Santos. OPUS Northwest, 915 118th Ave SE. Suite 300,Bellevue,WA 98005, applicant, discussed the driveways on Talbot Rd. He stated that he did not know the southernmost driveway had any restrictions. If it is restricted to right-in/right-out,only about 5%of the traffic coming into the site will use that driveway, and that would preclude a functional use to the site. Regarding the City's option to reassess the driveway after two years or 85%occupancy of the buildings,the applicant would incur a significant cost putting in the driveway and would lose a number of parking stalls, so a definite decision from the City before installing this driveway would be preferable. Regarding the height of the buildings,Mr. Santos stated that if they drop the ceiling heights to 8 feet,the building would become difficult to lease. Eight foot, six inch and nine foot ceiling heights are standard. Certain ceiling heights are needed by high tech users for cabling, etc. Also,considering the other buildings in the neighborhood,Renton Place One, Two and Three,and the Renton City Hall, a shorter building would be a little more out of place. A fifty-three foot height would make the project viable,and better suit the needs of prospective tenants. Mr. Santos reviewed the proposed alternate plans for the location of the driveway off S Grady Way and explained the reasons why a driveway located at a distance of 105 feet from the property line is preferable in terms of pad location,access and parking. If the driveway cannot be located at the 105 foot location,the applicant would take the pad out of the development. The pad was put in at urging from the City as an extra amenity to the neighborhood. The Examiner asked for clarification on the location of the power lines and easements on the site. Ms.Nishihira stated that this is accurately indicated on the site plan,and the buildings are set back the proper distance. Mr. Santos concluded by stating that the lot lines will be adjusted;they will be separate parcels. This will be submitted before building permits are issued. Kayren Kittrick,Development Engineering Supervisor, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 discussed storm water runoff and potential downstream flooding problems on the project. The ERC has required that the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above previously developed conditions. The applicant is adding landscaping amenities as well as addressing water quality issues through the bio swale and adding an oversized pipe detention conveyance vault. The Examiner asked for clarification on why requested changes to the project from Transportation Systems were being submitted so late,thereby making it difficult for the applicant to rework the project before the hearing,and causing the Hearing Examiner to possibly approve a proposal that may require major modifications. Nick Afzali, Transportation Planning Program Manager, Transportation Systems, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 stated that there had been discussions among staff and with the developer regarding the site plan layout and the building they would like to retain. He stated that the Transportation Division is working with other departments to evaluate the conversion of Williams Ave to a two-way street. Grady Way is a state route, and a signal there would have to be approved by the State Department of Transportation. They have been working with the developer to come up with driveway alignments that would work for the City and the developer and be approved by the Department of Transportation. OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 6 The Examiner raised the issue of traffic safety, considering the closeness of Building C to a signalized intersection. Bob Mahn,Transportation Planner, Transportation Systems, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 stated he was involved with developing driveway approaches to the proposed signal at Grady and Williams for the originally proposed Auto Nation and Home Depot. Regarding the Southpointe project,he was asked by Development Services and Economic Development Department to look at three possibilities for a driveway that could accommodate some type of development between the driveway and the City Hall property line. Mr. Mahn reviewed the alternative of a driveway at a 90 degree angle to Grady way. This has been the preferred approach to the driveway on previous proposals for development of the current site. Because of the alignment ll of Williams on a skew to Grady Way, it would be confusing for traffic on Williams to know which lane to use to enter the driveway onto the site. The farther west the driveway is placed,the greater the angle of the skew for traffic from Williams entering the driveway. This could cause confusion which may result in a driver trying to enter the driveway in the opposing lane. This situation would be the same whether or not Williams is changed I to a two-way street. One possibility that was looked at was to convert the right-turn-only curb lane on Williams to a right-turn-and-through lane. Even if a signal were introduced, it was determined that this would compromise the current operation of Williams to such a degree that it was not a viable option. Traffic Operations staff feels the alternative of a driveway at 90 feet from the property line with a right angle approach to the intersection is the farthest distance from the property line that is acceptable and has a good chance of being approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation. i The Examiner again raised the question of driver and pedestrian safety considering the closeness of Building C to the roadway and proposed driveway. Mr. Santos responded that the developer is not opposed to moving the location of Building C closer to the property line to the east to allow more space in the driveway area. Mr.Mahn stated that as long as the driveway is 125 feet away from the signal that would be acceptable. Traffic Operations recommends the first parking aisle west of Building C,running in a westerly direction parallel to Grady be a right-in-only aisle to avoid confusion and traffic congestion at the entrance to the site. Mr.Afzali stated that the City recommends having only one access point to the site on Talbot,as far as possible from the intersection of Talbot and Grady. Queues are building up at the intersection,especially for left turns during the morning hours. This situation could severely impact the functioning of the driveways onto the site from Talbot Since the developer desires to have two access points on Talbot,the condition of the City re- evaluating the functioning of the second driveway in two years with the option of closing it if necessary was imposed. Mr. Santos responded that if they had known they could have only one driveway on Talbot months ago,they would have walked away from the project. The City submitted designs for the entrances months ago which showed multiple uses. The developer hired a traffic consultant who designed the three entrances. The consultant did not include a traffic light because he felt it was not necessary. The City said they wanted a traffic for long-term planning purposes. Agreeing to pay for part of the traffic light was the developer's way of trying to work with the City. It is unfortunate and surprising that this design has changed from what the City originally told the developer. The Examiner asked for clarification on why the driveways on Talbot need to be right-in/right-out entrances, and if this was required for the proposed Auto Nation and Home Depot developments. OPUS Northwest,LLC 1 Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27, 2000 Page 7 'Mr.Afzali stated that the traffic generation and distribution characteristics of the office buildings in this development are different than the previously proposed developments, especially during peak hours. A high percentage of people leaving the site during the peak hours in the afternoon would want to make left turns. Traffic Operations feels that the signal on Grady and Williams should accommodate all the people desiring to I make left turns. The Examiner asked for further clarification on the location of the driveway on S Grady Way and the affect the location will have on Building C and the surrounding parking area Mr. Santos stated that the applicant would propose that the City recommend going with the 105 foot distance from the property line, and it being conditioned on the State's approval for that design. If that design doesn't work,the applicant will not put in Building C because 90-foot distance and the 115-foot distance and detrimental to the overall development. Mr.Afzali stated that staff feels the 105-foot distance, 90-degree angle plan(Exhibit No. 9a)is reasonable. This proposal could be forwarded to the Washington State Department of Transportation, and if they are willing to I deviate from their standard, staff will be fine with that. Mr. Santos stated that the developer would be willing to work with the City to take out the second intersection on Talbot Rd. He would like the City to consider previous plans submitted by Auto Nation. In the developer's pre-screening with the City,they were asked to put in an entrance/exit on the southernmost portion of the site if possible. This is what was approved for Auto Nation. The developer is willing to remove the second driveway on Talbot, if some of the other issues can be worked out. The developer feels this development creates something for the City--a development that fits into the CA zoning and the surrounding community. It would be a shame not to go with some of the developer's recommendations that are critical to this development and have something less exciting go into the location. Mike Ruhl, OPUS Northwest, 915 188th Ave SE, Suite 300,Bellevue, WA 98005 stated that the retail pad (Building C)was strategically placed to the east of the driveway. They have tried aligning it in different locations along the front of Grady Way. That is the obvious place for it to be located. More than likely,this will be a restaurant. Locating this building to the west of the driveway would really cut off any traffic going into the site. In addition,the parking stalls to the east will be available for this building. This was a compromise,because the retail pad will take about 10 stalls per thousand when it is fully developed. The developer has allocated about 30 parking stalls to the retail pad and there will be an additional 30 stalls on the pad that is on City property. Strategically,the pad needs to be close to this parking. Ms.Nishihira stated that the landscape plan indicates new plantings along Talbot Rd. Approval could be conditioned upon retaining the mature, existing plantings. The applicant has expressed a desire to phase the project. They have not defined what would be accomplished in each phase nor the time frames necessary for ;those phases. At this point they have indicated they would like a two-year extension to the two-year approval, i for a minimum of four years. The Site Plan Ordinance does allow for phasing and for extended time frame l approvals. The applicant has revised this plan a number of times in order to try to accommodate, at the urging I of Economic Development,a retail pad on the site. They responded with a revised site plan. All parties have tried as much as possible to make this work. The details of the Transportation Operations requirements are the finer points that are harder to mesh out. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:40 a.m. OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe 1 File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF 1 November 27,2000 Page 8 FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, OPUS Northwest,LLC,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an office and retail complex that will be taller than the zone permits. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 915 South Grady Way. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Grady Way South and Talbot Road South(SR-515). The site is west of the Renton City Hall. It is the site of a Puget Sound Energy complex that will be removed. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1547 enacted in May 1956. 7. The subject site is designed CA(Commercial Arterial). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site consists of an irregularly shaped parcel that is approximately 1,700 feet long(north to south)by 1,000 feet long. The site and surrounding streets are not oriented in a north-south or east-west direction. 10. The parcel is approximately 16 acres. The hillside under Benson Road will be left undisturbed. There is an approximately.84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southern end of the site. A drainage feature is located in a concrete channel that flows below the steep Benson slopes. The proposed site plan avoids the wetland and drainage feature. 11. The site currently contains a number of buildings which have a footprint of approximately 81,241 square feet and the site is surfaced with a mix of various paving materials and compacted gravel. 12. The applicant proposes developing two separate, identical buildings,Buildings A and B,and a retail pad,Building C. 13. The two office buildings will be 4-stories and contain 145,000 square feet. Each building will have a footprint of approximately 36,300 square feet. The buildings would be 300 feet long(generally east to west)facing Grady by 122 feet deep. Buildings in the CA Zone are permitted to be 50 feet tall. The main buildings would be 53 feet tall. This does not include rooftop equipment and elevator housings OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 9 which will be approximately 12 to 15 feet above the roof. A Conditional Use Permit is available to allow buildings of excessive height. The applicant has requested Conditional Use approval. 14. Building B would be more or less located on the southwest portion of the subject site approximately 135 feet from Grady Way. Building A would be located centrally on the subject site approximately 60 feet to the rear or south of Building B. Building A would be approximately 300 feet from Grady. Both buildings would be oriented with their longer side aligned with Grady. Building A was proposed to be aligned just to the west of the sightline created by the proposed Grady Way driveway on a modified site plan. (see below). 15. The buildings would have painted concrete facades with anodized aluminum window trim. There would be a bay with canopy located in the center of both the north and south facades providing the focused entry of each building. 16. The retail pad, potentially a restaurant,would contain 6,000 square feet in one story. The building would be 100 feet wide along Grady and 60 feet deep. It would be located near the northeast corner of the subject site along Grady Way. Its location was subject to change due to issues regarding the location and alignment of the one driveway to be located along Grady Way opposite the Williams Avenue South intersection with Grady. (see below) 17. The applicant proposes providing 1,108 parking stalls. The stalls would be around all of the buildings. The Administrator approved a parking modification that would allow stalls with smaller dimensions and a greater proportion of compact stalls than normally required. 18. The proposal would result in approximately 3,676 new vehicle trips. The ERC has required that applicant participate in payments for a new traffic signal that would be located at the intersection of Grady Way and Williams Avenue. This signal could control cross-traffic between Williams and the subject site's proposed driveway at this location. 19. Williams Avenue South does not form a 90 degree angle with Grady but creates an odd angular intersection. The ERC has required the applicant to participate in the signalization of this intersection. In addition,the City is reviewing the possibility of making Williams,now a one-way, southbound street, into a two-way street. That conversion is not imminent. 20. The applicant originally proposed three driveways to serve the subject site. One driveway would be located along Grady Way somewhere in the vicinity of Williams Avenue South, if extended. The location has been subject to City review in order to provide for the new signalized intersection and to provide straightforward traffic patterns for through cross-traffic from Williams across Grady and into the site, and for left and right turning movements onto Grady as well as the contra-movements from Grady to Williams and into the subject site. The location of the proposed driveway vis a vis its proximity to the eastern property line(the common boundary between the subject site and City Hall parcel) and its angle with Grady or the existing Williams north of Grady will affect how smoothly the intersection would work. Section 4-4-080.I prohibits unsafe driveways subject to City determination. The further west the driveway is located,the more awkward an angle for cross traffic from Williams into the site. Staff is concerned that it either creates an "odd" somewhat misaligned intersection or a safer one. The location of the driveway has an affect on the location of the retail building pad and the internal alignment and aesthetics of the office building placement. It also would alter the internal parking aisles and parking lot arrangement. OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27, 2000 Page 10 21. The two other driveways originally proposed would be located along Talbot Road. Staff had originally proposed restricting the northernmost drive,the one closest to Grady Way,to right-in/right-out to limit conflicts at the intersection of Grady and Talbot. Staff had originally indicated that the southernmost driveway could be unrestricted allowing left turns into and out of the subject site. Subsequently,the Transportation Division, in a late recommendation, recommended that a condition be placed on the northern property that would allow a determination of whether the northern driveway interfered with traffic along Talbot. This determination would occur after the project was built-out and operating in order to study the full impacts on the roadway. 22. The applicant, at the hearing, indicated that they wanted this driveway and that developing a driveway and curb cut that might be closed by the City would be wasteful. They indicated that they would probably eliminate the drivewayfrom theplans, savingexpense and freeingupadditional parkingareas. p Y p 23. The Transportation Division also revealed in this late review that they wanted the southernmost driveway to be restricted to right-in/right-out since they believed that left turning movements to and from the driveway would interfere with the safe functioning of the Talbot and the intersection queuing at Grady. Staff believes that most users would want to proceed to the Grady/Talbot intersection and would be safer if they use the Grady left turn to go west and then make a second left onto Talbot. 24. The applicant was disturbed by this proposed right-in/right-out limitation for its main driveway along Talbot. The applicant indicated that if it had known that access to the subject site would be so limited, it probably would not have proceeded with plans for the subject site. This limited access would severely curtail the market for the office buildings and retail pad. 25. Power line transmission corridors cross site the southern and western portions of the subject site. No buildings are permitted within the corridors or within certain setbacks of the lines. Parking and landscaping is permitted. 26. Ten feet of landscaping will be provided along the frontage roads of Talbot, Grady and Benson as required by code. In addition,the parking area is over 10,000 square feet and requires five percent(5%) interior landscaping with minimum width of 5 feet. There are landscaped areas at the end of parking aisles and in some of the longer aisles. The slopes below Benson will be retained. 27. There had been application for a lot line adjustment but it has not been completed. Staff is concerned that any adjustment consider the required parking lot complement for each building and shared parking and access requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Access Driveways 1. It appears the access and egress to and from the subject site is of paramount concern. Therefore,this office will discuss the reasons why, at this juncture,the staff recommendations must prevail. First,this office sympathizes with the applicant's concerns regarding the limitations on traffic to and from the site from the Talbot frontage. This office particularly realizes that the applicant was taken by surprise by the late submissions by the Transportation Division. But this office does not believe it can ignore their recommendation regarding safety along Talbot. This office was not offered any reasonable alternative. The intersection is a major arterial intersection with(four lanes of north bound or left turning traffic I !OPUS Northwest,LLC 1 Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF 1 November 27, 2000 Page 11 across which a vehicle exiting the subject site would have to negotiate in order to turn left and enter, possibly blindly,the southbound lanes of Talbot.) The potential for conflicting vehicular movements and therefore, accidents,appears too great to ignore Transportation's recommendations. 2. It appears that the Grady driveway was always considered problematic but that does not relieve the situation when the Talbot driveway substantially affects access to and from the subject site. Again,this office has to accept the analysis of Transportation and their recommendation on its location and the angle it makes with its intersection with Grady. These two driveway issues define the site plan in a major manner. Site Plan 3. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance aside from the driveway concerns addressed earlier. 4. The development of two office buildings and a retail pad will create additional employment opportunities and is clearly compatible with the Comprehensive Plan's goals that the site should be the source of employment. 5. The proposed buildings appear to meet code requirements for setback and parking, although,the retail pad should be located slightly further to the south and with sufficient separation from the Grady driveway to provide clear sight distance for those entering or leaving the subject site. Since the location and alignment of the driveway will be conditioned on final approval by Transportation staff,the building will have to be located appropriately after the driveway is finalized. The site plan has appropriately landscaped areas along the street frontage of Talbot, Grady and Benson. The parking complement is appropriate and a modification allowing smaller stalls and additional compact stalls was approved. The two office buildings exceed the height limits of the CA zone but the applicant has sought a conditional use permit,which will be discussed below, for the additional height. OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 12 6. The development of the subject site will create temporary noise with construction but that will end. There will be an increase in traffic and the noise generally associated with a commercially developed parcel but nothing unanticipated by the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code. The buildings are smaller than the adjacent City Hall and the buildings west of Talbot and they should have no undue impacts on adjacent properties. The ERC imposed storm water retention conditions to maintain pre-development release rates since areas downstream are subject to flooding problems. Redevelopment of the site will not increase problems downstream but will not solve any existing problems. The property probably should meet any current requirements for detention. 7. Development of the site will remove the motley array of buildings,and mixed gravel and paved parking areas and substitute new buildings and paving of all surfaces serving parking. There is some mature landscaping along the edges of the site and if possible,this should be incorporated into the plan rather than starting with smaller,more immature plantings. The applicant has provided a reasonable site plan given the limitations on the property adjacent to Benson and the power lines crossing the subject site. If the applicant does remove the second(northern)driveway along Talbot,the space freed by eliminating the driveway should be used for additional landscaping. The parking lot is very large and the applicant can shift parking to this location by spreading the parking to this area and incorporating additional landscaping throughout the currently proposed parking area. In other words,the applicant should not add additional parking stalls but redistribute them with more intervening landscaping. 8. The development of the subject site should not adversely affect property values,particularly, if access issues can be solved without creating hazardous driving conditions on adjacent roadways. 9. The internal circulation plan appears reasonable. Again,the issues of ingress and egress need to address driveway alignments, locations and turning maneuver limitations. The applicant may remove the northernmost driveway along Talbot if they do not wish to engage in speculation as to whether the City will ultimately determine it is inappropriate. In addition,as noted the retail building might interfere with sight lines if it is either too close to the street or driveway,particularly given the constraints on driveway alignment vis a vis,Williams Avenue north of Grady. 10. The proposal should not adversely affect light and air on the subject site or on surrounding properties. The development should not create any untoward impacts in terms of air quality or noise. 11. The site can be provided with adequate public services. 12. This office believes the internal site plan is reasonable and appropriate, ignoring for a moment the circulation to and from the site. This office believes that,it might be appropriate to reopen the hearing if the applicant has any submissions regarding traffic that might change the findings of this decision since the applicant was surprised by the Transportation Divisions recommendations severely limiting access to and from the subject site. The site plan may be phased, but appropriate parking and aisles shall serve the phased development. Conditional Use Permit 13. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36(C)which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; • OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 13 b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 114. Many of the criteria for the conditional use permit mirror those for the site plan. The slightly taller building, one that is 53 feet tall instead of the 50 foot tall building otherwise permitted in the CA zone is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The additional three feet will not adversely affect neighboring properties or unreasonably increase light, glare or noise problems. 15. Parking with the modifications permitted by the Administrator appears to be sufficient to serve the site. Traffic, if the conditions and concerns of the Transportation Division are complied with, should not create any problems. The adjoining streets are major arterials and should be able to handle the traffic. The installation of a traffic signal should also help create a safe intersection between Grady and Williams. 16. As noted,the parking lot is very large. Additional landscaping could soften the visual appearance of the site. This can be accommodated if the second Talbot driveway is removed as noted above. 17. There appears to be a community need for more employment generating uses. The proposed office buildings and retail pad appear to satisfy this need. It does not appear that there are too many office buildings, particularly for this urban corridor. If there is a reasonable solution to access for the site,the proposed site appears a suitable location for these additional office buildings. 18. In conclusion,the proposal appears reasonable both in terms of its site plan and its additional height. The major issue will be providing safe and efficient access to and from the subject site. As the moment, any solution to those issues will have to be determined and approved by the Transportation Division. DECISION: The proposed site plan and conditional use permit are approved subject to the following conditions: OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27,2000 Page 14 1. The associated lot line adjustment(file no.LUA-99-153),which must be consistent with the site plan decision, shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 2. The applicant shall install a traffic curb adjacent to both driveways on Talbot Road in order to prevent motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Road. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Services Division prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 3. Two years after the completion of the project of when 85% of the leasable space is occupied, and/or if additional site development is proposed,traffic operations at the northern most Talbot driveway shall be re-evaluated by the City. If the City determines there is an adverse impact on overall traffic safety on Talbot,the City shall be authorized to close this driveway if necessary. The applicant may eliminate the northernmost driveway if it does not serve their purposes. If the applicant does eliminate the second driveway they can shift parking to this location by spreading the parking to this area and incorporating additional landscaping throughout the currently proposed parking area. In other words,the applicant shall not add additional parking stalls but redistribute them with more intervening landscaping. 4. The driveway entrance on South Grady Way shall be redesigned to achieve the appropriate alignment with Williams Avenue. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division,the Traffic Operations Division,and the Washington State Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 5. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit for additional building height shall be specific to the construction of the approved Southpointe site plan. 6. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 7. The applicant shall move the retail pad slightly further to the south and provide sufficient separation from the Grady driveway to provide clear sight distance for those entering or leaving the subject site. Since the location and alignment of the driveway will be conditioned on final approval by Transportation staff,the building will have to be located appropriately after the driveway is finalized. 8. The applicant shall, if possible,preserve mature landscaping along the edges of the site and incorporate it into the plan. 9. The site plan may be phased,but appropriate parking and aisles shall serve the phased development. ORDERED THIS 27th day of November,2000. FRED J.KAU AN HEARING E INER OPUS Northwest,LLC Southpointe File No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,CU-H,ECF November 27, 2000 Page 15 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of November,2000 to the parties of record: Leslie Nishihira Mike Afzali P.J. Santos 1055 S Grady Way 1055 S Grady Way OPUS Northwest,LLC Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 915 118th Ave SE, Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 Kayren Kittrick Bob Mahn Mike Ruhl 1055 S. Grady Way 1055 S Grady Way OPUS Northwest,LLC Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 915 118th Ave SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of November,2000 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 11,2000. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in ,private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all 'interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. ----, ,--, • . . . , . . • . . .. _ • .. , ._- . ...-- . - • 0 opus.Southpointe • ;.411 - s‘ ; 4. rost4e—. • .,0,_‘>•N Y.),,,4 4)/ ,..-"'". .4,-,g- .-• :7 ...' /."''' \--.....;:s- t.,./••. ,... .-:-w-.4, .v. %,--,A2t,...*.i..:ww. .0,,x,„,v. .;4,,,„. • Corporate Center / .4? ,./4. \ :,ArttlY. 4;‘' 1°11,"'t,' %,;'4""• '... °;" 7 Z • 1‘" \*/ 44\--ct. . ''4,,.4 444,C-44,4*/ ' • /4 August 3.2000 . , - - s. .... •,.f, ,, / s,t• ..7:._ . , ../.• /ilk, .<„,...„. ,.,„- .. ,,,,,_„. . /. • 41..1-'`‘- - *77tiffigal M,"176‘,-it:. .7. .- ''''-'7 - 4.- ' . /7 • . >40..M" . 'fyirillr;'\-- . .. ,,,,,.........._,s...cp.aor w.d.r.;..e.. , . , ,,Ir ,.s.o.. th%• , .; ./.. 1 ' irolialigt• -,. , AA,. .s . . /I /// • .. 'It iNV • •-•' : W4qc., , . 4r440 - [ . iN. ..W .'5' -,..._"Np" -7,../ - •I'W;45).-:>"- ...1%, ,.;.',z, "6:". . .•-•.;,,,. , . ... ,.... A1,‘•/a/ thc...4.1'...•?;....,,,z.aw.,,....; Notrai °4-'' ‘41.fr .t\ \ ''•:V .1" ././\ . ...."7'.."- V_...- ;..;., • . #7010P.';'-.• / /'\ . .• -4.- ,,,';'-''7 4% ''-'\ '6>• • -,<> , • 41:0,..,,. / ./`,. 200o ...,, ..,z4v , „. .„.4 . , ,,, •-,-,,,,.• . .s.,.&, ,N.. 4. A. , • • ) .Witri , ' ,,,, • -''>•e'r,,,,:/: hi .." ,,(/'.4,ditiN.'deOWN: . -,'I's .••••.%'..- \ ,. / 4<,it*t410„N.+ r,bi/ ... . . NN ''''.4.1,,ii...-,_./ ' -,." ......._....,-,..,•'''''' ,' II / ,•'"N., ,., "4..Ai,: .e. . - Ai)11)p .:r:„.--"-','''-',____''5:::-..7,/,....,. _..,--._-...:,,.- - . :VI f;.".rot-4)•7''q.k>. i'• •+11...Sly. ,., I / 40111PA,,I,.T.F %)k'n,-1,\, :...... "41-40r4V.,....s,r,,A. t., i 2:---!7 ' ' I V z..-"Eici.,\ N i„...„, ..,..„. . • ... / •, :., .... „ • ,..,.,<,,,.. ..• \,•I ‘,,,, •, \ . #.ittibe i jh..' '. 4kt. 11144.P \ . ' / .. /N. 4,/,..C=ICI e '• — \ \ 'z' .., 0<; , ik6'491711,,e., . . . / r.• , . I ,.* i `,-'2-,,--, . ... --• \ - 1 . . . - -•- ri 130 300 000 .• . '1 . OPUS. d . • • F3 • 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 PI . ++V4.r+4.+— ' t+t4+ i + +4 r - � - V u• _- V .. � .L t + Ex • ▪ 4. 1 I 4/ +t+++t+ 4 • + +4.+ + + + + + + I ! / 4, + + + 4 + ,4. + ______ 1 + 4 + + + 4 4 4 4 4 + CALI + + + + + + + + 4 4. 4. + 4 �+ I1 + + + + + + + i + + + 4 4 + + I+ i + + + + t .�/F + 4 4 + +•+ + + 4 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 + + +_!- ` + 4 4 + •4 4 + +_+-_ + + + 4 + a,+ + 4 + + + 4 + + +I +---4,-+ + + + + + + + 4: + + + + + + + �-1' + + + +/+ + + +++ + -+ + +� } } +4 4,...+-'1 + + + ,t_+Y ♦ + + + + ,It+ + 4 7 C` 4. 4 4 4. + 4 4j+4+ + + + 4 + 4 + 4. + +� +4 4 J. i 4 -+ t 4 4 4 + 4 4 4 4 + t + 1�A1 + + • + 4 + 4 + + + 4 4 } + 4 4 - I --- •. 4. 4. , i + + + + + + + + + ♦ 4 + 4 ,__ + + + + + + . + ji +1+ + + + + + A+ 4 + ++ + -+ 4 + ♦ Y---} + + 4 + + 4 4 + 4 + + +1+ j _ .no + + 4 + + 4 4 + + 4 4 4 + 4- + 4 +4 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + IftwIlp ®wo.��� + ++.4+ `4+4+++++++S++l e.ntbn Village Pl. O•• C, �e� +4▪}}}4} ++}}++4+i + + + + + + + + + 4 , r_t i - I , f I - I \l - i _2 iq Z �S 115�l fit. - ,�,�r I`ve \CN z z __ _\__v_i___i__ 1 1._L__ 1....!.1._)______ i ! I 1 Li i__ 1 \--rja- ---C°- --I--. — IR' --L-8: ! lip 4-1-- t'..) �- i \ . _ —= --- .- - -1_� =S.! 17th 1 S;t.;— a ; P, ._._..__ .: _____t_ __ ---_-vr — ;R '8 I _ ! a) S 19th St- •, - , I I-,=� - , _.\_ __. .. . 1111 ! I ; I { �� I i • -RI --8 -R !g-' =__ i ! { CN _, •.� — R8 --;-, • , • : I R-8 (9 • cn — • __ ;• ,� - -: s S 2fst St— ,--'? . • \. -- -' .----I c", - —-' 1 �/I I 1 //\ \ I R�\.' I8 - ._ -S;=23r-d._ St.I ' ' 1 .! . __ _____\ • • ._ . R4- (.77 , ! • H3 • 30 T23N RRE 1/2 Y �o 41, G3 °. ZONING . 1+4800.• .,. - + + BR'W TBCHNICAL 88RVIC88 2,_ 1., ; P/12,E 19 T23N R5E E 1/2 • 0 25 50 100 . ,,• -a_ I i f• I • 1 il.E Fir PRELIMIN RY SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN-- •• , . • •••• --• • . -....,--- • ...,,......,,,,,,,,,,,_.---.0•:,- --,--..,,-----71.,_. izz.,-,.-4-___. A.,-._____Frz-------;,...„.•,....._-:._,-.....::-..'„?:-.,,t1.:..„•_•.:,.........-i,...#0-77...4-.6:;•-..\-,-__--- _\......„-ol\-----Q-,.-s::0:11.,:f.,.._E-1......v.„-:::,:__-.,-7.:„.„---, :.-..zz,.:5.--„--7.-----,<_.,..,,,,,,,Ii.::-.„.._\:..,?..--•:-...',-....:,',..-..E.,....,,,\:•.:.2::,..-:-.3....,:-,•-,•:',..:-.:;"':___•::,••':-..1.--.1,..L.-'•_•.5f.:1..:_--.,:_,•:::._•:_•:_...... 1 '••:.1, 1.----- ----:- ----- -.2- ----A.DE -, - '• ....- --.2•---,--t-f----::•-•-•,- .'--..17-Z.-.---:_:-.".7".,-;AFRE8•70. NUR;•• .:4..-•:,..,'‘,.'•••••-•-•-••••--flm-:.. :1::"...7...,•:-..:2•;.•... •T• t•f°6 ........ . ... ..../...'77-7----__,.:...---•-•-=-Z---.:7,---S....•... 1 ;A., w k- ...... ...„ . :•- ' COSMO 50.POWER ..;.•.'"• '..!':•:•%••••••••••• '0.1u•-•• • -....- S'Ci''' Mt EASEMENT • REC.MO 9512171951e:•.,.. '•'•‘;••••••••••••••••••..7177..Z7r''',•!,?•-:__T:X.'7.•-• --1'-!:.-.!21.r..._ -.7 1.7-';.•1--;;;-.2..•••‘7•-•"7,.i. \--. \,s,4 ••1: \ OS E . (•5,1,..!.) ..z 1 . . .....s..-\ ,...,c(-Ck ., -,..,--".4)._ ,,.r.-- -....?i,--;-.., •-_ • .--7.- 7••••,-.>:----- . • ,. ' ', . --.7 \,.."s.... , . •-......-.,.....-:..... :. - ::,:i ! ' -.;...'• ...\----... -.....---..i..,-." 0 rt.._ i-- v- ,,,, .., .0:...- .-,,,,>.;. .. ,:_-___- .-(1,,ki. ki\i‘i ,ii'irj,,,:•,,l- ,f',, 21:tr,,,,,,,,...0,roNr. ..\..- .---- 7.)•'•gi•iF„'• ,„..,1:........•••:.• -\i---. -----..........- -:-.. :::::::::::•-•::•::.5.--,•--,L.'--,.- - , \...•• --,•,-;•.,:,-•,... ,. R __. , Z EJ-; ..:•'' /•• ..,'.,.-••..,./,::::::--••:•:..Ci•r•••':*•c'r t7-fm-art% )\\'•,• ' ••••'•.:.•'•-7'..• , gEc. pionfilo50,,y ' -. ,.‘k ' ' .-• 1 V."....7.-.-1-.. 4\:::ues:,,,,,,"----,7'..:::•:--:-.,..--..P. I! A ' ii..; 1->-' ,,,-...*-"- -2,,.<.:.......'),---v... .----:::: -\‘i..' .%., i 'f"A lir',/,'"INF------.-7-,_:-_-.•:\-- • , .‘.____,....,. c z . .....;:- - .K.',.....;_i;/_-->--•"-----..... / fi,,i., .i.r•::: .).'-- \\oda,/ b I_ ... --_ IN .,,. 6301 5.9. 1 7,--__. •mAz-.1111,14 `' BE.A.,,,),-.--.-. : x ...,.y . ...„,-- ---- 6-r-sco ' , 1...?",iiiiih•V''• (,) a_ • :-/- ",,E.476.,e/,.‘k,-,--'?/,,j/f,..,?X\. /1...' ----1" r i ---_,It......-_,:-\--\:::---\ \,.\//:.:V'' •:% q co. 1*c • /„/ . ..:-. .----,. .• f!• c•VA-,i::.•\•:?..) •• •.----. .' ' 2 g co_ . . ,.., . i i9--' .• , ,, • • • • .i• 1.11. To,..:!..,.. , • •• • /zloxi-_---,---:,,-..., --.---,;07„-,4,-z.,;,-_,..._..,,,,A -).../.„,11, ,• .„.-,(ffitil tit . i .. --- - ...4,0,..,,,,:.,--,•,... -----... ,....,,,,,,,,,..,. -,,,, „-,,..qr r .. .• . E o (71 cc 1- • 'V "-..,e7.;.--_-;.:02-7'''‘'Z-.Z-Z- _-:_•?-3-:; !S4 ..1-i.':Y.,1/14:--c..,k\-"I/.f'.21111.-'. '...''. / I I/111-111-1-1-1-11#1V \ \ .'It to'.1 \i ) 1'. ' I.#1'04 .114' . ..'-. .‘‘..' E1 c'-' = 050. ••••.:.Ac7CL.'',....a...:4'-...- ''''',S:•"•••'-''';',.... 7••‘4.2....•••.*;71.1f*!:!••••:U... '•;••'''-'•''.'; 1,4 1 iji .•'/' . /;„ , I,- - • \ ... ,R Cu . Z -.'" • 7,7 ''''<fp:',-% -----'.....-::*••:77:..'----- - ---<:e'rIF'=1 2: ilv tt- . 1.-Ltp.ii ) '''M --\, '.1-' 1\;U 1 ---- 'fill ti \ • ,\,... i 4, 'rECjaNO J •..•,..........'‘...'i LER'E'-•• •-• e-•--,, •4.•:.• '. 1 IlliCkHb\ ,I . ,W DI •• • • . !1 ,. . • .:,..,,!,•,;.- ,...- - • ' . ,,, . - i \ . ..... „• . . . ; )0-i %1,2 , 11 - ea 7VK---4((c / •'' \ s 4. ') • '-.,, . •4'''''''m:•• ' • .LORDING ST S \7\ A c iv,./-/-/.1#98217 951 -:•••:..0,4:•7\ ...- ,;,„4..> ,-,..-\w, -,,...• , . -.., r-aur-.....,''''---...... 4'• ',4• •:, ,/12 1111.' 1111111 1 .f________.,\.,,;;;;‘,.;:b ,----- . ..."-----, it• / •,pa , -----:-.'1:'.::: „.,, , ,\ • • ... - ,.. -: fli 1 ,,,,,,A • • /I\ a.` SIBIBBIP .1071,/,_,.,\,:,..: ,b..,..,:,...\\'...,:q /--Hti ... .• • .,:_, • 1 az • \ \ --- ',, .I' . \ \•i / .___ '-' \\ 1,,, 33 at,4 • . i. , '-:. .• ip.n.a: .40 , .., ii .‘, --,,.,4 141‘,V., \ 1 •••„.. ,. : o•-•,,a, •-• -7._• .. ,) .. ,. . BUILDING A 11111111111 ...:-..... 1 Hi rq , : . ._ ,,:.•... ,. • , • ,.. ,,, ,,,,,.,,,,,, Ai , ,_.•_., .F.,,,„,t,,... . . ,.., 01 il#H#11 \ ,, ,., .__.....- ,,,,, .• .• :__...,. ...: .., „.....y.,„, . , .__• . .„•,...... 0 _1 8 to a o g "Zte •.:, ,,,,.,•s,,',..;:: \ ) PERIMETER .1 • i l• LAMOSCRPE '''..•., On,\,. f___.,..„ .._________. . 444. „ ••. .... •C;D• • • 1\-..p 0' ./. MC warm REG.NO 705290484 ul 2 w co < ''4''''''\ ' a '••4..-:‘•: 4/ ...., s,., , 3 ilme.-...ft.•:........." ";-'1 \,,'• ... ...„ , , c ..'::.:,.:,...•• ,.\,. . . EXIS1140 .1 . PM'EM ''''' •' \ /e:'' ''.7/ '.. : ''''1.'1•22•Wro'ill//11/11./ ..:‘te: i • \ \\'''•)0/ . , , MIR" . I.'sow < ?Ili,i‘„,„/...- \ -.--,1 \ ‘:::)' ;) Ex• z ,::;:l ,' ' ' .-;:..... •i ` -. „ ...„,,,.........2 hill,i, 2)LOW" .,, . \ . • / • 2 . d li I •-- 4,-, ri. .04. ...• F ----- ' ''.1:-/://-01-1-Ahrhil ''' "' .• • \• --.‘• .:41 -.1V:8?:Ay, .•, / ,.. , . • ,•. . ,.. , .- , , E.coo.co txPEEE 1 op. t °,1 ' FIBE VEID.6./N. •-•.• / /1111 0 , "-• . .-. •-•• 'm :../ .., , bowls 01.61. . .'... - .. • .. X ly ) 'MEUSE • ' BU1 NG B ..- '• - -- , • \ 4 r o ss.3od csr •••,,45.200 5S9 • f .:,, .. . •• CC 9 ,•/,' 1.4 .1•K\..54, 1 ' m eril'--. k. /'' i ••• •• •• • •'• 1[1 lraTC:11 . ....--- • ' ' • ....., • ':'. I. i • , ' -•,..1-•- p,....,-N\ ., __ -,. P. y .. . s., .. ,..'''`..• --V L1.11T.1.1 • . . • •. " ..,.-.. ' ,...,,,=,.;),.:, ' 41.4.''''Z'''''''‘:•...... .. ...'... ..E.x.rst.vorftit ---:.. .7--.---' ,./..",.7. /‘ ''4' 'M''''''•'!"•*" ' ..,2','•.- --• -:-'1;f1.1"..":',..': .-%:,-".:.% .•, .• • i tx a .=-r-.'-*---'4.z t---- ll I \i"gr.-'..------- 111!1,113/111/114 - ...•-''-- .k''',:;`,5) , 1.I dl, "----..........Z.'.",g"' \ •-_-_-: ___-_- ---,,,,--,-- , , ,.. A„. :i illii -1 41111111M" _____ _ , ,....7. BUILDING C tf..-.- ••••., - p,o...i ET. 7:::_ie----------_______________________, S.„..,miew• •T...„:,t.,......,..____.......n...•'-'---........_____. ......„ sP8.015)1• ./5. .,, ,I)..< . % ....._________ ..v._•___ .•mm.,,,,,,,,,Z1111..w. --------_, -----___ . •O. ----4 ft .' r •.•‘' i„. • AY •,••>?•:: : •......./ .4 V.•!,,,tal ii,„, 'VI -,,,_ •:,4----- ',•,•17. i .. .,. ' .• •- :•!- ' .,•., 11/11[10i tui_111 •, „,„,2,p•...,,,,' - ----=--___ - ' '-- ."44111111111 : -t. •"....1•6°..c 3 I . __ •.•--• . -• ,• 7' (4).'• ..:',,,'.., 4 .•. Ill • ,•ci./.....-r- )1 •,•. ••• ' • .] 0' " • •• • v s N . ,•• ,7,7, 5 " •,-,,, ,a A - -- -- -------7,-----_„. _ ,, ...• ---,Tin/.---41 •••`;•••-••,-,_•'....''•••••1111,4111ftlik' . ACCESS 7 I i T.• .'41-- '1.• ETLP i /i .ZCift,,, . . ,, ,4t,\,, ab....., . • 'll'EiTiFf , .1 . .„...,, ..,,%.!•,7 ,. .: / i'd*/:/ /i ' : I ' ..•.,,,....- -''':'''. --------- -----.-------7---------:k---:--:------- /../ <7 1 it// i / LEGEND AA0 OMER •• Tft.' , 7/'---....... -------:.__• _'-'--------.'•:'''.---UnuTts, -- -• --.!;',,,,,.., ..._----:-Z7R-7---/ •/ / ; 0 :s747,-4,,,, COMCRElt PAVEMENT I.• •.1 • ,,.' / ,"srrE bATA -------.-----""°'m --- ------ '•• -- -i . :"---7 --z:'-'---• '' '. ./..•'.••-•' ;.;,•• srrE ARM 15 98 A.C--•-•-•• --•-••••---172 ED •••••.,-....„,,,,,,53: -- -- --••-•••. . ••,,„.. --.....i,__••• . / ./ / ,•, i , , TING E't. S'el rtfrA' PROPOSED CURB MO GUTTER .-.-• ,• 095.000 SO FX)--- •••••"--... LE. -29'5'.--.-*/ . ' . -.,'---'''' f...Y4,.*.----'s.."4 ..-, . / // ' / •I A,LV a--0,,A = -- • MONO CURB AND=RR • ""/..,...,'""" ' -'.---•"•"' ..G/?,1 7",••••••:. '7-----•\,. ...., .._ .,- -•-•-",ipoli,../ ...1.1.i I q PROPOSED RETAINING WALL omo />;.0/,.•; PTSCro:DOr'j/S'115.W'Sl. --------•""N• --....„ WONG B: 145.200 SF Ve'R''S,Y1‘117, °CC. •-•......... 0•540540 WOO: ' .,.,.„ Ta4R14,1GE......."......„,. _t-.1...p... . ...v._---.11ma _. .ti 4,G, ' PROPOSCO AMARA,SLOPES COOK TO OR BUXOM C• 6.000 SF 6.•••• 1 GONE° GREATER DIAN 40Z \ ,,,,!.. 4, WM. • 205.400 SE '••••O... 1".E5M10..1371C1 "•- •••-• ."••••• --•-•f ..1•J':. .•-•-• -''••-•/-- •••"-•••'I I‘n•.' I 5 AM OF 40%SLOPE•21.503 SF \Of'4,•:--5 NOTES or'..V..4 ..... RUNG SETEOCKS REGUIRCE4 RITCPIOR:(BBC ONLY) 10'FROM GRADY ION 10 rRou 'MOOT KAP 10 FROM BD)Sotl WOAD werlArp,MG& stE PUN RARIGAL ANA.01.G. REWIRE. ••1814 T&FAIIATILS "'•-•••,..,,:::"..-/•••.,:"Z,•-••-,.-.---•-•-•-•••.:::".•":.:..„,.117/ I.'!-11'';..4.: ' ..• ,.. ,r7..--..._. .i,. % ••,,,, .. . I to.kts W ME Ploi31-1.w 01-07-01 1 CITY OF RENTON PARTKAENT cri. orIKEI 1 I.)ALL DANE/MIS A9..0 ...At4 . 1104N .' ....7 ammo sawn PROPOSED: 254.MOM easox PrN(C.Pt)it) ONG A •4',.... .prztr,,,,,,,m4..,0:0:01.4 H.Pt.TO WRONG C PROPOSED: 4..0.163,F•FROM TRICOT ROAD RAN TO BUONO 0 133'MOM CR.WAY VW TO BOLDING 8 . DE 5 SUMORPO 480 COMPACT..., 4 LOADING STALL StiL 0,•15'. (STANDAZO A 1.01.0040) 51•11 OM 505.•le(COWPACI) .' / I / . , /'/ t -. .. ..y.:-. a.aosswoas /,.... •... I.. .. .. LANDSCARE ARM I Of LOT CINERACC IOW..ARG4)•11X ). '...• OW. SOB 1 .A MUM: 5X-24.840 SO.FT. PPONONI 91000 Se(9011) 5500 59(1100108) ma 0e:PAs0skproj0/25\5,07numeA7725-55 t1s, Dotafimme•OS/II/MO 08 31 Scoie•1-50 potrich xreic 277251•13.27725P1277259S. • , . • • r ' 4 ; . .> r a „ a. ..., a :',< . .:.: . ,.«/x.. ,. .l,. ', ,.: F �ay;, � r?�'.f.'',.�>w:'".. Tr. s F ' ,.s... :,,>,.EY.::a,.r .. ," r:,. ,, ... ..r .,•:: .>..?, ,> ..... ..� ,. .s<....v.4........ ?C' , b. ✓. ' ' / w>�;'. h :^rS r< " 4 �.,..>g v,Y; .A. T r.x,, ...n.,n.t:o:r, _, : .,.!'.r. ,�. .",.rr., .. .. r><r.�.F>.; a.v.xm...,,a w.rt ,;..,'te.,.w.:,,u:`:r..„ n>„„',ki'i. ' S•V .. .v:z °:, .a7,, !y'r L„::r. <.,,.. r.r rr".o..Y.,..en,.,,-<>,x.<^✓ ,.: ,aa., ,..s,...,„<..,rr . < .v.,.. .V•''z.^... .. t > .. .z.» . . e„ .r,>, .s • • ..,... ,r <, . , , .... ., :. .z. .. •;"„`:};... ,'�„E'�;A`;;��?c rah'tr.,�;o ,•`..:tin' Southpointe <v, ^, . ... > r �.�::'� Corporate Center .., � • .,.^.: .x.;": Y: : Y: T • .`A .,,.:v"Yz,,,.,.,..:t<x.,,...,:.<•, , ...,+., ' �.. :.. ..:).t.,,., ;• Renton,WA September 6 2 000 f�. , 5 e t r.. .5; , .a SJ< • • • . .. •:atwrr�rtvwt" 1;s Ir"' �"ka "kwr"rrrr"i , - . .. , .... , .. ,: .,.. F.F:E:n:.36':0' II • .SM<'v a .�.. "k.lf.. >. ... ,��...;: '�W...:,• ,';:r�:.ar�' ,�>, s.x�ra�'.,.. „FY. '.is^r.;�;-:,e...��. vr�"� :�R.. „ .x;Yi.bbnn.,..... s. ,ar r .. ,dG� -... ..`.;� 5Y '));xma x;.•^�s'.,'SS`� ;s.. A • tc:;•..,,:.., =r'".`r;a�<.a 4�:. :a""... <.., Y,. .. ,, i:^ .kn .< ,e,.. :o1^ n '• if .. ....:f.a,:x?:• ,4 . ,>'.+,C'x c�. .<'eA<:E!g:i c� "mic'ri.`�„,o0,: '.o. " �. . ..n"f .°: 's�^^, �'1; :..''�..r.:x ..y. :::,;...! x„.x'. �.,' t."�i :.' ..ro?:< ,xoF` ".,wmx.., Na... .F�.> <Rk.?;' ,.k'�i'",zt.�''i �:.,i+:.�i' .yY.^,., .,;�..,x,..R<•.R '�. .r "i<.'S,'';`'>'33'¢,,�,��"�"R„'r)°^`,:t. vs .rs.&'.. ,..,.sr.:. .YYs<>sl3. ... ,...ra„�`.7�': Fx<>�..pp 5.,..a',�«,.<"'P:r,:..' xM„,.�; ,�:�':::�s'`�::::.»'r,�' . .a":) F' ,rs>x' ,.y.�,,.,. ..:�.m%'�$.. ,<„3r.::>`.:<.r..�...,v.^ `��:a�,r'�' ..,,ar'.r.�..xf:;�,:>,., �r. ".Y.t<�.'x...,.`s�„., 4 <`'r.:.' ,�' „ V., >r: „'io >"'� :. x. r.Y4 4 >'x a , k .. :? s`P ifi , ,,x,:, x. `.;.r'C .„•`,.r...xJ:as:,. >.... ue`i >< ;` ., .,>;� .. ... . . M..: .. <"Y,K1....;sy'.." �x:•.; '`, :� R" x:? ''��.j- r,.rk" :>.,n':< T,x�„��,R.... sskis"'.,'.;'A,..r '-r�... � �X~r. >wk;��r�r.,. £�,'�;;;. ..<<:^ a,::d`..,a::as ..x.� ; rs „�,_7... �:'�.° .,3:a�£ >. >.'> >:`£..;�?� �, :R' .„»x... rd`'»,PYi, ,,fwri . .a;:srr, ...x">�,'�>r':. „,>£� *�x'���vr.,y ,.r< ,r s>�.. �kvr.i::nrF.v r..z� zr,. ,�.f . .N,�.. .. .....fi ,. ,,,: ...:.rr ... ,r;" ,K ;Yr>: .5,,, `;..a , r ., ,11 s N. ' g.,:,-.r` :+ Ai•`.: •:;s.4,f,. f ,!s. ,.;�£ `:ia',•:u,a,s. .,4. <.."•":s>sc tr•.s � r /> w ,: .��+����„''S.,.,r ,a. s ..0 h.�,q4 ,, dzr,�„�., „ktY'• r� � ,r.r• 'P>✓ ,'�F�,,"hr x.s,a"v�s'r�, ,.., �:s sFa�;.�i •i£'?ri„rs�siY�a�s,%.�,, i/. ;.Fr.,.. ,3:.t;t3£�;: �J,,,i,£s h' rs „ :r Y t 4,,£,,', r<,,.. ,. a , : /> ", „7,,.�i.,,,. 3 f ./r.;z;y.., ��' rt.tf�,f,;,,/tz,»r��.�s,u.t��' <v;4t's. ",,6`'s`'" "�fk'£r.����£(t '�9 '.��''r'�•" '<;�"'j;iili-'�:MNr"�� r'"i '�'� :sy" 1";; •,sfr s�x=l k', ?':` ' ,4� „ r „ r o, /r' ,o" =/ s r�Y'.4 A,Rst,-.5—ryr<'',': ,. r;; . y".r, 3,..0,-lg.✓'r�,;;;;� �r'-• ;!i;';� �f'r 7 /�lru,,r .k' 4 7,,,i••' g=yj<"'zr.F;r;, 9 r r d%' „i�ri �r '."i, �"�'"rx�,�/1'r• y'�' +, ,,;' ,., n.l9.y� �lrf� �„ r, '� �' -�''�' �ar'„�,sue"!, r.. j�� � yL�e�' �`;,., o/'r „!„ �#�9F����.e a +i.G /N, r,f.�� ��'�„',.,/�, s�lf��l,�,<'r�, •c.S fm� �3. i;:G,:/ r rr ," ., r, „ 7�',, ! ,,.r r •, r ,r! ./,,,"!, ..,y.:';%r'tt; �tlrt<% '" ,_'�.i£££>;;�.s .,ssz",.r .:zs���' ,,r 5.—:,i f SY��;<..,T .,. •r ?,,,��X�.� 'r s�'rs ,.,�!,,.. ,rf �:..,,c.,/" r., � , ,.,, ._. ,. a .a,..>„a w,y„Nr K�"x,r/;fr.:,t£;i<.,,,,:"'.,.,," ,,..,,, ��. ::%'"„�; ;N;��'._;i••,�, . ,,.�x>: ,�,, , . ,,, ,<",., " a..,.."./a,"�i�s•-,-t s..,l'F,/�S.:..%'r ,Jrr//w•s4`"'r r./r/`.or c! �,f._a ,,rF„s. 7-„a2''� �,rr,� 'N-i,/k, ,,:41:-- ,�£ .,!' <5 rL z ! • rl iw,. ,,,,,",r,',r , :,',0 µ ,.,/7',.V:;•f .,:: _i. .,K., . r,t�,-c7p.,s :;;, ,.r',' ti ir": 'r`v;tt M"„_:r„_„W.r,,,,�,.7wk,:,;,,,'i',fr,,,•,, c.'...; __,fr,% .,5<_.2;;"-<f.tr.. r .�,t,,,rr , ,""�," .,�r�.:,vt..s,i",:�"_,_.v,,. ,,..w,r,5<t'�:�: �,"„ .':/r.;, ,"r> F.1,.„t:",,.,=v,.r:%4_,>,�ir,..,, i.,.,, r•,.,,Wt�;.c„t•t<,,,..,r. s r .r.".;t�.,>":;,.. ",sf„s.u. s%1;6`„ ,.,,..,: "„�.... ,vy„,.,,i..T6'k. 3 n;>iit,ttt,RG�:.. ,-r...^:^„•.:,'^°•.,•r''x:,.,a x..:3' ,.;,£::. 7 ,.z P�L:w',�m.,r,r,: ,a .s >!' "4. m.4 0 �z"i x ,..,., "".,, ,,b.s.,✓`..1,i�r r....,...,..;ra.. ,. .>,.". .,n2 3 ''s;?!.ws? <,., 3:. tE:r.., ., .< .,....x.. y,n__. < ,.. „ , n ) •<,<t.i" ' ' .,Y,^', � i< ,.. ..,+. Cs,. ,r,., to £o n,../.,x'(F.`. .,cf ".a". nx5:..„ .. ) rr",: .r,., .1, i..:,,.^'.>, {,.,•,', / s ) ,.".5..f." ,,. , Y...>. . , £ r rF ..� "�`::_..: �'S.r£-.fr` ..:"<<"r �y,'.::;''a/;;�.,r?;,^ GZY••','n., .,,sxrr.,.yf, "'w's"' ::'^Y r <,,o w,<.,w.y.:.<:..<' ^_:r...n.,,,a>.^ .,.. >n. .....,4..,„. .. ,..,_.t3 „".'f si" �"'Si^ ..£ ; .. .>. r >,.s.,.. .s. "..R,. .. :.s`.,.ro v: n,." m rr>,�."t:::`.:. ..,•�",::., ..<75f., r,a`.'ssyl.�£j'=�s..r;�y�� .... .......::. ...<> ....0 ,.,..,., `.s . ....,w,<.Y. .o:F.,`.h...,,F-t3 " .rk...^...." .., ....a,t.,: , ,A � "d;: s.:o' ! "','v..,^. ,Y•.."��e::` ,< „ <, 4:.. .. ..,'<:fF 1. ,./r.:,..,,,. „ .,,.^.. „,^".,<.: y)3 ,. y 3..:.' ...^..^),.. {,.. {",,,<Sn:f;rV.,`;' f,:l. .x.e.{ ::f:%t`J.�,C�/iTs i..,; .. r. .w , ps.£k.<.. .o.x ..,. : .. .. ..,.,.,A..>.,.. •.A. .. , .... ,.,�.„r ,:b. . :` -"Cypcal'Niirttieast/Soutliiivest,Eievatiiti` ... ,.... rt. ....rr :. s '% 3. . ,:�,' ..'..,.?..:..........,::..::::.♦.. ",q,. •<�a....,�.,.,k ,t.v;."N - ""r.#iJ`^.".,,....�mr"e'r,.R.:;•',kx>k,>yz>SS?<j. .,.>., v .5 ✓,.:...f /.,.?✓l.t .r.. s, s :"<;; r..,....,u '.£': r;4;"E..:: v:•..:+5. r... 3., ...,,...s.. ,.,,a./.... .ixr-+w':' <x.Y, w-":,, ,.. ..,. '. '"`Y.;F.i: ,'£ <:Y�,'^ -' •a,, rn . ., n,..n.., t."< .r ;,.,. ;1`",:r, � ., 'A:,f ,....r•.,., n > ., ,o". :. ;` '�¢v.v ...., ,. :.. .w...,q r."•.....r..r.✓..n. Y'.t.ZY. .r'•t t,. r .. T .. l,.,.. :. .. ".1.:„. ,.,o .',4" rr>t".. e ,",f.'rr .,<. .>.>., .7 rM. £.. n,.0 .£ ,. ...,. ,:,..F„r :, ,.. 'Y,',r q �y �Y .,7,<,F<..> r.,. > /s..cs..�,.,2^.,ri .,.Y",. ., ,. ,,. �Fc >., ,.., ro.... ,...zr.�'.. '. s, $ .. x. ".^,.. , .rn.5� ... sV ,S , as...<`...frR",., ".. .x r i. ?..."Q ,.L'.h ,. , ... .., .c,..rrh`•.xf „".r,•. ::`"+.."� .t :•' '��Y;.v... .^N` ,....., �.�.€,:,ice..,a ... ^.., a" ...,.P>._n<.. , >... .. .t .. ..,:':��^c`?,...a >f ,.S> , , e?,,•^.✓tr)':..,l:i .,,.;W .r; .,. <»"4V. .:,r:•aA .%Nt<.,CTi.'. ter.ti��`'<.. „ .Y:3;£L•xcY" ..,.,w,k::,,. s`��:r.` r;:R, , ,.`, ,. ..,. kt••Y:��„_ u: < . ^,:.,: ,, >' .. :�3`..,.;. *.r'=: ' '1.::::d h z ..,, ,,.. .^ ;,,.R. , ... .,..,>••:.y... F`s'r.r r->;;i; z„•.>, 't -;;.,,.. .n s,:.. .>-:a ,,:,,., r•;:' n. ..,.. >.> .&s.;.. •,°. ,r xJ.%�;:, :Y,i'4'r..",,,, ;,resa ,!> '>,r;,.l,r„',:<>..r,. :. s.r`'1:5.,./,<..:4„:..,', r,., , .,r,a.,,.F,r.>; sues, ..,. .,...,.:. ,. ., ,...c. r ..., s ..?>,, sr'.,a,.o .., .o,' .,'."�,/.r.'r.::5",<,r.>..:£: ..,x: ^ s''/^!",i'r ".s 1.,4...ru,.�/a< ,ceT{. /.r/r_.:>., .<4;.),., ....> :;;99ES r t:<% rx`<Y ,s": n,> /,:",.,r,.,r..,,,.5y,,.',ci f<E r ,..r 5.,,..•,,,s .t ... <.s3.f,755*�',/.;' Eld:Y:,.�ir:ic.,,s i..,, >•, r-.,,.rv,...,. !.. alwd. �.�}., 1 entS�reen. '�� ' .s.. '.,4, �s�r/ ,. „ ., e.r,_r'-.,� T,.r. ..�h!^:'4.e.�' r..:s,n, .,<,,.r:r'a;#'..., .+.r, ''� .,r, r...�p ▪ / "rr„ :. , . ,, ,,,,,.,.45i,:.r„ ".,..>....,. ,„ .<...,.,,,, . .Y. ...... .....a :-�y": 4.1.... ... " .r <�: ,, ,. .. , .... „ ,..<. °-,•—• - -:Tnted.InsulatedGlazin In, ,,x< ,.,,. Painted Cprtr.-te Pafel,:. .t."„ .:, . .. .," „ ,,., M, .. . .. ,. r, ,., , . •.,,' .,...:'^;.%'... Cleat'Anodiied Alu inum Fg amin, • , .x. R M_ s' ."swwr srt •wwwwlww awwwwir"wiwww , <, „ '5,...,qt+�:ri/.s.:/;tf' i .:"�'.' :i E `..l ,.n....J...� ..i..�l�lli ... < 3.... :I.. • ..�._ :''i:., • • ,. MM�� 111311 INN N®#, I® :fin 1. •;1J� ]: �#::iMa:'5 M®u� ## ®• INN.NMI 1##1..1#1 MI: I , : �, :; • • • �xm-'. •■■ y■:, Ly��•;:.��Jyy� ■■ • 'r�.■■.w..��..�y■( �.w;p�w4�w5����YYyyA{ ��»�s-•,'�.�e :. �s•'Y`i.;~�'t:..^ - ry{� ��y1[. ' • • :" ^Y' P#Illl'IYR11111®MIf/Ss ,.. E, ''' WMS ` i, '' ' #®•m# 11 IIIIIIwf111 . 7:.•:" •zi:•• ',:#• ..ill.•fi•• :•,:t.m '® =1##I ®IE ., , F.F.E.•26'.:0n w",www�!a�s „�epli�s}i7Y iii eM Ru wlwww+Rwww..-,...11NI A�k ""1ntrs"1'.^ws„"',. w ei .1a.w«.wr,"'�...,,rmwwwr . s<z:;•, .. ...,x •x' sr '''; i.. ,s .z xr, : ..,: ';e>:•.:r s. sY, 'sq';.. "ese. v.n Y.w- ar,.x :�C.,,,. ro .: rb�;'. � � �, ern�r ..... ,� . ,.r>:?�}^4:.�T.�':�:�:. ..�r,:st:r: ,,..Rrt �:a�;; x'u�•x�E�c� ,;�a.. ;Y�.?��'«; ;;.ra:-�s�r�:�` ,2:.'�?><t L..:rs :' ,. ..�> rY:k.°,...9'sr.:F'r ., th.. ::;. n "t r.^ �:x�.. ... ,',4.'K?.:..'I, .n'`.�..`,'`N �R: ..v..,g,.'tJS, �".. .k„Y. nos :Y +-?'n•','.G ��.f eJ'.N<> �.� .3:ffipp,... #'�" �>`.. ::fAi':N�'r�" ..'J'Fi� ;, .,�......s;.».,rc .... ..... �x.....:r�,.R....;..r . ...: :..,R•.L':we ,k.i`�?` :t�; na x2� r; .�^ ,�:,�e,a'�"s'�xr. rt�'w� >��rr`�; �?r u:i:.'�Y N u,^ `< a a��'S ; Y. :i£ �" .��,�'t�` :.. ','� zn.',< .,�� '` ??s[sSk. sF`'�,arr>d:� ��,<"Y 't. xs:��' '��;^y�xs>'.'s�;�7�5v>.✓,,�s',�v..<?z%r� ..a�:s .a'ss.r, svna* .`sue .>fi .,,k!. s spe , t,'s,N) "t . � �g ' � 'z0,'0 s6:s, ;x .Asy.$ ' . :A _ ���� '�'"�"' �;�<,?a '». s>F,a�• i •.d,�'.�,• ':�?.�, ������A,�' �;��r r,����', >, '.s �s�',�,tr' '"��",ty •r;%ir." �y,,,�. Y!/, t �„y,, . ;i '�"µ ,.�:=-_ ,.�- .,, ,•', �• .x, „x;'.::'S,x<•tfy:.`t'r: .Y.,a4 '^ds.••ana lLr. '?/%,y;�.„, <,•„..•xf✓ty5•.' rs�r !+s/-• YY 2 zur �/�� r''PF•<'g ;,w:L.,,". „m, E ��.,"�•,,,.�'.`�s, hrs,:t:":„ ..'a�-ma's:J�•�s'<R:> r•.r,�.'iJ.:�, rr:strt-'yt:'��x:q�s:,.!'??fs✓;t�:,:-„t.,r^`;y>'.�$:krr..r*`,? >/� 5.� "£sxr<�',;',.. stts�'� 4,1/•;,;:rsr."". /s.; ;x'1, >""', r:.. t' s >.:rrr ,..11:••'S ,,,.i :...,..!<,.;.:f:s :£`xr.M t,sE. ,..,z,,:•, r+� .;z/3"srr..,. 5.:3%<. ,>: Y xa>< x=:. ,,, m„r ,,,.c. ,s. rxr .,,",..:;,./"„"n R:.. .,..,.,.'55.4/.9',>Y' 5,".,.,,;=trr�zt� :t "..,...,x. """.,_ 's's"' ,.t. .:Ti£r Esa;u;;'.<s.• `xis ";.,�.',x'; s,�•;?:. „�:r•.x:'` ;.rf.;fn, 'E.r'�;: ,t, .w,;' 1r,...,,,"„>.. ,,,,"rx.,�.:,._, .,N".. ,>,. ......r >.,.:,,.�F+,<.;yi.......,,., .sit.<:3.,,wti.'✓^Ei�.r"� k,1<'S"_; x,>. t%' ��:�' .cEt., a•;?,,. ,.,'x.',. ��,. ......:....."aeyr...." .,.,.,. tv,.z.",:,,/,r i,. .,4.".:T...,., }sz".. ,s$..", t.::u,. ........,,., r,N .�>"•:r.:" s:4ia" >o.�s£�s'" "''�. .. '.'fx, x'sr,kor a''kY 3; r„x,..., r,.c.'s,"F;.., ,".",X,... r""„_, .,.,z... ., �;'S•',.. ,..,.r .., r y;.xs,.,.a�,'hz., ��'xr,�f'k:x.} ..>,..., y r .,.,,..szf.:<•.. ..r;f.,.. !.,>.,,,.,, .... k, " / :tr Y'/" ,>�,..�i�•�:,-> x'f .,1..3/•.::::'N s. ". < .: ............ ",., .,',n,5,,'.r:e;....,.,e ,,...,.sft.z'..>:.,.,..::#.:;>.: ,4 f.....':x"sa1;,• %'^ ,^xlS ;.:>n.:;,s?;'':'; %mac ls`o-S'�`'?x;,r S,n'A. ." .r.:..», .r,£;C k,.. ...Ssn is;'�ytg ,; <., :.< <„",. <R .,...,<". ;,,, r ^".,,,. ..".�^.5,.,,m„ s-..>• '......£ o.".<,"..r3^:s':.,,...r,, >'..♦ ... ..;<' ,'f: „%i<,s. , '�'..,,„N,.7X✓✓'A.<^sY z, .h n , .. .,,z .. , ... .r, W'»<.,.. F,, n o..,: . ..,., ..;/;..:...•a ai"...G'.''.:>'. ,.f�':' ;<?:':;>;Y x:'i:'.x".�'s�,zk k,i;::''F .,.Yr ,.�.. / 'f y..rst%r£�s,t.. ,. ..,• .., r,..,,,s..:.. `.,...•.>,,;",m...,,.:(.':^ .>, .., r„R..^^r, .,s.x.rrs`x ,.,.;, s,.... „fe ';,x.,lr.. '`.!.C:. ..<:�< Y{. . u ., „ . k, ...>?n't...t ^,.,.. •.... .<, �..f.<.,,,� ..< ., .,::�.,,,.:,`,>rn.;;,�,;.r. ;sy,�„ tyk,'r :fyr%, t.;4i>.,.,'t✓; �S cs;'=tr,..,n:.. ,r:r:,g,-r.,�".,'. .:,>,.r .s R.S.. '< .r, . .. ` ,, ': ,▪ ., ..,•':%; •• , . R, a�. ,"n..,.,, ,t. „,,,:; ., <^». ,r ..,<,, <, , r : r:'i ".;ay^;; A`'r a>an.. -- .".r t' .....•�"„ <.r, '. <..". `...... r.. ..:.t: ` > : % ,S`'i'^;.fir.: , .. • rrrrr� ,. ,TjrpicalNorfhwestlSdutheasf Elevation.: r 0�-OPU . A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Exterior Elevations AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the _ . • SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL TALE REVIEW Ca daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non- months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the Significance-Mitigated for the following , English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, project under the authority of the Renton ' Municipal Code. Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal So,UATOIFyollrirE newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King t A'-00=124-ou;sA,E�. a Environmental review for construction County. of two office buildings and one commer- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South cial building. Location: 915 So. Grady County Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to Way the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, nation mustt be filed in writing+onn o or before 5:00 PM October 30, 2000. Southpointe ' Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee I with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, as published on: 10/16/00 1 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA • 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are gov- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of erned by City of Renton Municipal Code • Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information $54.63, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. regarding' the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's - Legal Number 94 ; Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing , will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the , Council Chambers at City Hall,November 7, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site , approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will Legal Cle , outh County Journal be heard as part of this public hearing. I Interested parties are invited to attend the , public hearing. Subscribed and sworn before me on this I'— ay of ()el—. , 2000 Published !n the South County Journal , October 1 i.2000.8294 - r___---"trri_51.-?—®°_ ems ` (7.74.6.1fp—_ . A PR �Et� ri:, o Notary Public of the State of Washington :.).°•••.e, o.. c) 1. , ? 6 2 , °°° residing in Renton �' ° King County, Washington ��AO�,,, I aA S ppo a`am I/ • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ' PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 07, 2000 AGENDA • COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Southpointe Development PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-124,SA-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The is proposing the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements along South Grady Way. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The applicant has obtained approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. Due to the size of the project, Hearing Examiner approval of the site plan is required. In addition, the application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which is subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval. Location: 915 South Grady Way. APPEAL PROJECT NAME: 1:30 PM Dean Sherman Apartments PROJECT NUMBER: AAD-00-112 (LUA-00-085,SA-A,ECF) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of administrative site plan approval for the Dean Sherman Apartments (File No. LUA-00-085,ECF,SA-A)for construction of a 67 unit apartment building. Appellants feel proposed construction is inappropriate for the residential area. Location: 415-435 Williams Ave. So. hexagenda r 1 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: November 7, 2000 Project Name: Southpointe Applicant/ OPUS Northwest, LLC Address: P.J. Santos 915 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner/ Puget Western, Inc. Address: R.B. Boyd 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 File Number: LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H, ECF Planner: Lesley Nishihira • Project Description: The proposal is for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements along South Grady Way. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Due to the size of the project, Hearing Examiner approval of the site plan is required. In addition, the applicant has included a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use.approval. Project Location: 915 South Grady Way /! --..,�., �`S�`'r v •. • �' ♦ �,,d-. ��OPUS. '!.%` c'T 4°? 0 ` ,`� ram,c . Southpointe / , y�i leefe' QO+� 'wq�7zs�° 'L.4). n..1t�'A ��:::.$ ), `��! Corporate Center , %+� •-,. �� V` � "�'�� �. '� y'�"� (��0' 6����4,�,�v��F°T Renton WA August 3 2000 'R • :.:-, %../a „L N'4r t t%:, R+/. T ,� t,14„4 J` ,6b,t 1 / ,A1 „ Y 1 � a'wraa�S-G°AOV Wvg ff•�✓,' ��QO�$' . ) 'w°, ti z kW" O 4 Op J+ 4m:,: ,,„„;,, 4, ‘v. \ .,'IVir / 4:44V.v., -'‘`' ' ‘:'` NOM .r0-41:, __, / A, ,,,,.4,400-,,,,- ,,,, , 1% '.4V>eAttro4 : •74,7tir-7.4r, _,..„;,..,, ar" wt./. -vilty,:i4N17 ,,ti,4„4 i ';.4 ,,t, ;%, 7 Ilrfr" :' S Ae.\A' 4:,.. ' 0,-t: 4:7-4p..• • ems_. OPUS.-- .—__..,._...+._ ---- — — — - -- City of Renton P/B/PW Department Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 2 of 11 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Puget Western, Inc. R.B. Boyd 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite 310 Bothell, WA 98011 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area—Commercial (EAC) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant; Three existing buildings are proposed to be demolished 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North: South Grady Way, Commercial and residential property; Commercial Office (CO)zone East: Renton City Hall and 1-405; Commercial Office (CO)zone South: Interstate 405 West: Talbot Road South; Center Neighborhood (CN)zone 6. Access: South Grady Way 7. Site Area: 16 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 81,241 sf The three existing buildings are proposed to be demolished as part of the current proposal. New Building Area: 296,400 sf N/A Total Building Area: 296,400 sf N/A C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Annexation N/A 1547 05/15/56 Autonation Development LUA-98-151 N/A Approved Home Depot Development LUA-99-157 N/A Withdrawn Home Depot Lot Line Adjustment LUA-99-158 N/A Pending D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (RMC TITLE IV): 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070:Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.B: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations—General Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-070: Landscaping hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department - ._:..aninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 3 of 11 Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards Section 4-4-130:Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted an application requesting Site Plan approval for the construction of an office park development on property formerly used by Puget Western. The demolition of three existing, unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. The subject site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning designation and is approximately 16 acres in size. The project would include two, class A office buildings, one commercial/retail building, and utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements in support of the development. The proposed building footprints would be approximately 36,300 square feet for each office structure and 6,000 square feet for the retail structure (covering 11% of the total site area). Each office building would be 4-stories in height with 145,200 gross square feet of office space. The retail building is proposed as a single story, 6,000 gross square foot structure. Total impervious site coverage, including parking and entry driveway, would be approximately 468,000 square feet (67% of the site), which would be an increase of 11,700 square feet over existing conditions. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. On-site surface parking would be provided for the development, including 1,108 parking spaces—for which a parking modification was approved in order to allow a reduction in the minimum stall dimensions as well as an increase in percentage of compact spaces permitted on-site. The applicant has also requested additional building height for the two, four-story office buildings (three feet over allowed 50 feet),which is subject to special conditional use review criteria. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on October 10, 2000 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the Southpointe Development. The DNS-M included five mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on October 16, 2000 and ended on October 30, 2000. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ..,..ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 4 of 11 dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above the previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the _ review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits: Credit shall be given for the existing buildings on the site. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. 5. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the City. The City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards the Traffic Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E, "The Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following": (A) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the property is Employment Area — Commercial (EAC). The objective of the EAC designation is to "provide for commercial uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center downtown designations" (Objective LU-AA). The proposal appears to conform to the EAC objective, as well as the EAC policies contained within the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. (B) CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is also located within Auto Mall Area B. The CA zone is established to provide for a wide variety of retail sales and personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile traffic along designated major arterial streets. Professional business offices, as well as restaurant and retail uses, are considered primary permitted uses in the CA zone. In addition, all uses permitted in the underlying zoning designation are also permitted within Area B of the Auto Mall Improvement District. The project's compliance with the development standards pertinent to the proposal is discussed below: Lot Coverage —The CA zone allows building coverage at a maximum of 65% of the lot area for project not providing structured parking, or 75% if parking is provided within the building. The hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,o:;ininary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 5 of 11 proposal is to construct 296,400 gross square feet of building area with a total building footprint area of 78,600 square feet. The project site is 696,000 square feet in size, and would, therefore, result in a building lot coverage of 11%. The CA zone does not contain provisions regarding maximum impervious surface. However, after the completion of the project approximately 67%, or 468,000 square feet, of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. This would equate to an increase of approximately 1%, or 11,700 square feet, over existing impervious conditions (456,300 square feet/66%). Setbacks / Landscaping — A minimum landscaped setback of 10 feet is required along arterial street frontages. This requirement is applicable to the site's north (South Grady Way), west (Talbot Road South), and east (Benson Road South) boundaries. No side or rear yard setbacks are required unless abutting or adjacent to residentially zoned property. The additional landscape requirements of the Auto Mall Overly District do not apply to non-auto related uses when located in Area B. In addition, the parking regulations require large parking areas (10,000 square feet or greater in size) to provide a minimum of 5% of area within the parking area landscaped in a pattern that reduces the barren appearance of the parking lot. All landscape areas must be a minimum of 5 feet in width and must include underground sprinkling systems. The proposal complies with the required building setbacks of the CA zone. In addition, the landscape plan submitted by the applicant indicates the planting of trees, shrubs and ground cover along the site's street frontages, as well as within the interior of the parking area. The landscape areas proposed satisfy the minimum width and percentages required by code—38,600 square feet provided throughout the interior of the site (over 5% of the parking area) and 93,000 square feet provided for the total site. Height—A maximum building height of 50 feet is permitted within the CA zoning designation. The proposed four-story office buildings would arrive at a finished height of 53 feet, plus screened mechanical equipment of 12 to 15 feet above the roof deck. The development standards of the CA zone allow heights to exceed this maximum with a conditional use permit, which will be discussed under the conditional use portion of this report. Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations—The project would provide 1,108 parking spaces— including 605 standard stalls, 480 compact stalls, and 23 ADA accessible stalls. Section 4-4- 080.F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the proposed use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 290,400 square feet of office space and 6,000 square feet of commercial/retail space— requiring a minimum of 931 to a maximum of 1,367 parking spaces to be provided on-site,which the proposal is in compliance with. The proposed parking areas include standard, compact, and ADA accessible parking spaces. The applicant requested a reduction of the minimum 20-foot length required for standard sized stalls to 18 feet. In addition, the parking area would include 480 compact stalls,which is equivalent to 43% of the spaces provided. The applicant also requested the approval of up to 50% of the parking provided be permitted as compact spaces. The requested parking modification for the proposal was approved on October 11, 2000, subject to two conditions: 1)the approval is contingent upon the provision of 1,108 or more parking stalls, and 2)as many excess parking stalls as possible shall be placed around the perimeter of the parking lot. With the exception of the approved modification, the conceptual parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. The proposal also satisfies requirement for pedestrian connections from both Grady Way and Talbot Road to the public entrance of the building. Underlying Lot Lines — The subject site consists of four adjacent parcels under ownership by Puget Western. An application for a lot line adjustment was submitted in November of 1999 in conjunction with the Home Depot Development proposal on the same site. However, that proposal was subsequently withdrawn and the lot line adjustment placed on hold. In order to ensure the lot boundaries are consistent with the currently proposed site plan, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the lot line adjustment (file no. LUA-99-158), which must be hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,--.;,ninaiy Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 6 of 11 consistent with the site plan decision, shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. (C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday,would mitigate these impacts. (D) MITIGATION OF.IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The area proposed for development is relatively flat with elevations between 20 to 22 feet. The land use application indicates the development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material would be removed from the site as a result of project construction. In addition to the abandoned buildings proposed to be demolished, the site is currently developed with asphalt concrete pavement and some smaller gravel-surfaced areas. The project would only slightly increase the current amount of impervious surface area, thereby resulting in a nominal increase in the,rate of storm water runoff from the site. However, based on comments received from reviewing departments, this area has documented down stream flooding problems. Therefore, any increase in the release rate above pre-development conditions should not be permitted. As part of the Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) issued for the project, the Environmental Review Committee has required that the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above previously developed conditions in order to prevent potential flooding impacts from the development of the site. In addition, in order to mitigate potential erosion and slope stability impacts from the development of the site the applicant must comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report regarding site preparation and construction. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by the measures imposed by the ERC, as well as City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. The subject site also contains a number of overhead power lines located within easements that cross the southern portion of the property. As proposed, the buildings appear to be adequately setback from the easements. Within the easement area,'the project would construct surface parking and landscape features. A detailed landscape plan would need to be analyzed prior to the issuance of building permits in order to verify proposed plantings would not interfere with the power lines. (E) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The project would develop and improve a currently underutilized, vacant site. The proposal is anticipated to increase the amount of employees in the vicinity, thereby encouraging additional development. Therefore, the project is anticipated to conserve area-wide property values. (F) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION The parking plan appears to provide adequate aisle widths and backout distances for the safe and efficient circulation of vehicles. Based on the site plan submitted, the applicant has included substantial street improvements along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South with the project. These improvements include sidewalks, benches, and landscaping designed to encourage and attract pedestrian usage. In addition, adequate pedestrian connections have been provided that connect the main entrance of the building to the proposed street improvements along Grady Way and Talbot Road. Pursuant to City Code, the project would also be required to install street improvements along the site's east street frontage (Benson Road South). However, the applicant has requested a waiver hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ..,...ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 7 of 11 of these improvements from the Board of Public Works which will be considered within the next two weeks. The applicant will be required to comply the Board of Public Works' decision prior to the issuance of construction permits for the development. The applicant has proposed three driveway entrances to the development— two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The northerly driveway on Talbot Road is proposed approximately 400 feet south of the Grady Way intersection and would be limited to right-in/right- out turning operation. The southerly driveway on Talbot Road would be located approximately 360 feet south of the northerly driveway and would operate with full-turning movement with the westbound approach to be controlled by a stop sign. City staff has approved these driveways as proposed subject to recommended conditions of approval. Specifically, staff recommends the installation of a traffic curb within the northerly driveway on Talbot Road in order to prevent motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Road. In addition, in order to ensure this driveway does not create adverse impacts in the future, staff recommends that two years after the completion of the project or when 85% of the leasable space is occupied, and/or additional site development is proposed, traffic operations at the northern most Talbot driveway should be re- evaluated by the City. Furthermore, if the City determines there is an adverse impact on overall traffic safety on Talbot, the City should be authorized to close this driveway if determined to be necessary. However, the driveway proposed to serve the site from Grady Way was found to be unacceptable to the City due to safety concerns as stated consistently by City staff during initial discussions regarding the subject proposal, as well as with previous development proposal's for the property. Section 4-4-080.1 of the City's Driveway Design Standards prohibits the construction of hazardous driveway locations. Therefore, the only viable driveway location along Grady Way would be at the intersection with Williams Avenue South for providing access to the south leg of the development. After consultation with City staff, the applicant revised the location of the driveway on Grady Way so that it is located approximately 105 feet west of the site's east property line. However, as proposed, the angle of the driveway would not align with Williams Avenue appropriately to allow the intersection to function efficiently. In order to ensure the driveway is appropriately located, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the driveway be redesigned to achieve the necessary alignment, or appropriate angle, with Williams Avenue. The satisfaction of this requirement should be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. In addition, the analysis of this access point indicates that the new intersection between Grady Way and Williams Avenue warrants the need for a traffic signal. The signal would benefit both City Hall and the proposed development by providing a functional, safe method to enter and exist the site in both directions, including left turns. City staff will perform intersection and signal analysis to determine the fair share contribution between the City and the developer toward the cost of signal installation based on private benefit verses public benefit. The required signal must be constructed as part of the proposed development project per ERC mitigation measures, with the City's contribution towards the signal cost to be credited against the required Traffic Mitigation Fees. (G) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The proposed office buildings and retail pad would be sufficiently setback from property lines and structures in order to provide adequate natural light and air circulation to the buildings and the site. (H) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that minimal noise and odor impacts would result from the initial construction of the site. These short-term impacts would be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise impacts associated with increased traffic and activities resulting from the completed project would not increase significantly above existing conditions. hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department - . ._..:.ainary Report to the Hearing Examiner • SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 8 of 11 (I) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE Fire Department and Police staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. As imposed by the ERC, the applicant will be required to pay Fire and Traffic Mitigation fees prior to the issuance of building permits. Adequate sanitary sewer, water service and other utilities are available in South Grady Way and would be extended as necessary to the buildings by the applicant. (J) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would develop a currently vacant, underutilized property. The development of the site is anticipated to increase the overall appearance surrounding the area; thereby preventing neighborhood deterioration and blight. 6. CONDITIONAL USE FOR ADDITIONAL BUILDING HEIGHT (A) CONDITIONAL USE DECISION REQUESTED 1. The applicant has requested a conditional use in order to exceed the maximum height permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA) development standards, which limit building height to 50 feet(RMC section 4-2-120.A). 2. The applicant wishes to construct the proposed office building at a finished height of 53 feet, as measured from the finished floor elevation to the mid point of the roof deck elevation. The proposed height includes an additional 12 to 15 feet above the roof deck elevation for screening of rooftop mechanical equipment. 3. The request for additional building height would total a maximum of 68 feet in finished height, which exceeds the maximum height permitted in the zone by 18 feet. 4. The applicant has provided justification for the conditional use criteria for additional building height as specified in RMC section 4-2-120.0 and 4-9-030. (B) CONDITIONAL USE DECISION CRITERIA The Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information with regard to the request for additional building height: 1. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. The applicant has also submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by the Transpo Group dated August 11, 2000, which documents the capacity of the arterial streets intersections are acceptable for forecasted levels of service after the completion of the development project. The subject site is bounded by a principle arterial street on the north (South Grady Way) and on the west (Talbot Road South), as well as by a minor arterial on the east (Benson Road South) — all of which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. In addition, public transit service is provided on all three of these arterial streets. The analysis for the capacity of the arterial streets serving the subject site included in the City's Comprehensive Plan accommodated for potential traffic impacts generated by the subject site. As previously discussed, the project development will be required to install a traffic signal at the Grady Way & Williams Avenue intersection to ensure a functional, safe driveway. 2. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan,program, map or regulation of the City. hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department - ...,.,ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7,2000 Page 9 of 11 Land Use Element Policy LU-169 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the consolidation of parcels to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. As stated by the applicant, the subject proposal would consolidate three parcels into a unified development on a 16-acre site. As discussed in the Site Plan analysis portion of this report, the proposed office development is consistent with the objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the development standards of the CA zoning designation. The requested conditional use permit is to allow for additional building height for a use that is outright permitted in this zoning designation. If approved, the resulting building height would not conflict with the general purpose and goals of City plans and regulations. Furthermore, the building would not be inconsistent with existing structures within immediate proximity of the subject site. 3. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The applicant contends the additional building height is only necessary to allow each floor to be designed to meet market demands and would not result in additional floors. The proposed office development would include the construction of approximately 290,400 square feet of office space, which would be outright permitted within the CA zoning designation. The additional 3 feet of building height proposed (plus additional rooftop screening height)would not result in an increase of gross office space over what would be included if the building were designed within the 50-foot limitation. The approval of the conditional use would not result in an over concentration of office uses in the immediate area. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The CA zoning designation allows professional/business office uses as an outright permitted use. The proposed office development, as well as the requested additional building height, is compatible with surrounding uses including Renton City Hall and the Renton One, Two and Three office buildings. 4. Effect on Adjacent Properties:Building heights shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of the maximum height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot designated R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14 or RM-1, then the setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the Commercial Zone. The subject site is surrounded by commercially zoned property on all sides and is not subject to the additional setbacks from residential property. The applicant contends that the overall height of the buildings would be lower in elevation than 1-405 located to the east of the site. a. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The CA zone permits a maximum building lot coverage of 65% of the total site area. The project would comply with this requirement with a proposed building lot coverage of 11%. b. Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposal also complies with the required 10-foot arterial street frontage setback requirement of the CA zoning designation. c. Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. hex City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,,,.ir,ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7, 2000 Page 10 of 11 The proposed buildings are not anticipated to have a substantial or undue adverse effect on adjacent properties. Nor would the additional building height create adverse visual impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed roof top screening will be designed to match the architectural style of the office building. As proposed, the office buildings would be consistent with the context established by the existing 7-story and 9-story buildings located north and west of the subject property — including Renton City Hall and the Renton One, Two and Three office buildings. 5. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. The subject site is not located within or adjacent to residentially zoned property. The proposed buildings would also be compatible with the existing office buildings located east and west of the site. 6. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. The proposed development would result in a building lot coverage of 11% of the site area. Surface parking is proposed to adequately accommodate the needs of the project and appears to satisfy parking regulation requirements with the approval of the requested parking modification. 7. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. As discussed under the Site Plan analysis portion of this report, the proposed traffic and circulation pattern are appropriate for vehicle and pedestrians. Impacts to surrounding properties would be minimal provided the applicant complies with the recommended mitigation measures. 8. Noise and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. As required by code, lighting would be downcast and shielded in order to reduce potential impacts from light and glare. In addition, the proposed building height would not significantly increase potential noise impacts from that associated with an outright permitted development. 9. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The proposed development of the site includes required landscape setback areas around the perimeter of the site, as well as throughout the interior of the parking lot. The requested additional building height would not create adverse impacts requiring landscaping greater than that currently required by the CA development standards. 10. Accessory Uses:Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. This criteria does not apply to the subject proposal. All existing buildings are proposed to be demolished. 11. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of RMC 4-9-030. This criteria does not apply to the subject proposal. All existing buildings are proposed to be demolished. hex • Cif)/of Renton P/B/PW Department i ....::.unary Report to the Hearing Examiner SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7, 2000 Page 11 of 11 12. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The proposed use and location would be adequately served by existing public improvements provided all conditions of approval and SEPA mitigating measures are complied with. The applicant has included street improvements for Grady Way and Talbot Road with the project and will be responsible for extended necessary utilities to the proposed buildings. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Southpointe Development, Project File No. LUA-00-124, SA-H, CU- H, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The associated lot line adjustment (file no. LUA-99-153), which must be consistent with the site plan decision, shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 2. The applicant shall install of a traffic curb within the northerly driveway on Talbot Road in order to prevent motorists from making left turns onto Talbot Road. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 3. Two years after the completion of the project or when 85% of the leasable space is occupied, and/or if additional site development is proposed, traffic operations at the northern most Talbot driveway shall be re-evaluated by the City. If the City determines there is an adverse impact on overall traffic safety on Talbot, the City shall be authorized to close this driveway if necessary. 4. The driveway entrance on South Grady Way shall be redesigned to achieve the appropriate alignment with Williams Avenue. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division, the Traffic Operations Division, and the Washington State Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of building or construction permits for the development project. 5. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit for additional building height shall be specific to the construction of the approved Southpointe site plan. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals(SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. hex A t / v/ • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest LLC PROJECT NAME: Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant•is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above the previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the existing buildings on the site. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the previous trips to the site. 5. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the City. The City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards the Traffic Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. MITMEASURES CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED): ADVISORY NOTES • • APPLICATION.NO(S): LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest LLC • PROJECT NAME: Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a. request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of.a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination..Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations: Planning 1. Two full sets of revised plans, as well as PMT reductions'and one colored display set, must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing: Airport 1. The proposed site is located beneath a primary aircraft traffic pattern area, subject to high usage. Low flying aircraft transit this area, both ascending and descending, and the applicant must be made aware that this will continue, and that occupants should be made aware of this fact prior to leasing. • Fire ' 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of each structure. . 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler ,.standpipe, and fire. alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building- exteriors. Roadways must be a minimum width of 20 feet, with a turning radius of 45 feet on the outside and 25 feet on the inside. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. • • ADVISORYNOTES ' ... Southpointe Development LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF • Advisory Notes (continued) .. • Page2of2 . Plan Review—Surface Water 1. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. • 2. Surface Water SDC fees based on :$0.129/square foot of net increase impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. • Plan Review—Water 1. Any new water main, fire hydrants and.DDCV assembly (fire control system) must meet fire flow requirements as well as current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. 2. New water meters must meet current UPC standards. 3. Water SDC fees of $0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credits would apply. , Plan Review—Wastewater • 1. .The new building will be required to.connect to existing sewer with sidesewer permit charges of $80.00 per connection. 2. •Wastewater SDC fees of $0.078 per square foot of:gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credit would apply. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Street improvements on all roadways abutting the site will be required (Benson Road South, South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South). South Grady Way and Talbot Road South have existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights in place. Benson Road South needs full street improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights, installed on.the project frontages. However,these improvements could be waived by the Board of Public Works. Please contact Paul Lurnbert at (425)430-7304 for application and process information. 2. New driveway access will be limited to 2 on Talbot Road South (south-full access), north (right-in, right-out) and 1 on South Grady Way with alignment to Williams Avenue South. This access is required to have a new traffic signal installed with the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic study that is under review by City Staff. . Parks 1. Please note there .are existing overhead utility lines along Grady Way & Talbot Road where proposed landscaping (trees) are shown on the landscape .plan. More-detailed plans are required in order to support the installation of trees under overhead utilities. . . 2. The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping installed within the public right-of-way. . . Building 1. Methane gas mitigation may be necessary. • anviRnRYNnTFs . F3 • 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 z• ++$2,'1"1++" +++++++1+++++ - '' .x-7 ,liX :Ift: . :I:4: :r,i: ----7.1 t--- V ++L • + + + + + + 4. + + + + + + + # # + + } LH + + + + + + } + + + + • } �+ , + .+ + + t } + +▪+ + + .... + +I} + +cACo+ + + + + + + + + + +▪+ + + + + + , + #+ ++#+ ++++++++++S++4.R rit i Village Pl. _ -i • i I i _ \I - 40. _ Zoi- - r - 0'-4J I I N � ' ai ....-I ON-Ri m . a Z .( cSi1t. - 1 �NC N Wz N _Li. J-1 -i — 1 — I F iR8 f ;— \ \\ J1i 'Ch - 7-— - - 0— 1 _-- CO' •- 11 1 fil� d \ N. , ___._ ______A___._ -4-- -I----C)- TS-ritr-Sti. I - -- - --- - . t -- R1 8th - --R_1 -- S 19th St- - `8 �_ I_�� i . Ilil ' __1_' v) CN I --r - ; R—1 ',,Y�7'T T—._ ...1' 1--i -- -.---.R R—8 CI "� --- 7,-\ ,' ' - !-- S 2f$t �St— . e ---r: 1"\: _______ \ . 1-4 \ - S- L---. --R-8--- ---R-78 v, i K. 8 - S j-23rd-1 St. 1 1 'p_��:� J I: R. i ..--- \L\ R— H3 • 3OTZ3NB.SEE1JZ 0®o b .,_, ZONING . • -P/H/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES .rt10 : ,,a, 19 T23N- R5E E 1/2 ° 25 '° °° I-:iti°°• PRELIM! RY SITE IMPROVEMENT PL N - '--,`-- i 1 1" 1 . ,I R_199.19 L 1693]' ENrsRINO 5L -- X aKEQGEa / ; . .� .$. I \._S:zz IaN g''-. ,___= . 1-`-- ,%i= ';D" N - ;'> _ __.--_ ME H)D. - ,.� �\ YENr - _� �� n- s•zeai- E _: :�c, ;_ ':�wawsmReApw:. .` _ _ �,.: c ___ Z .[ 4 COSMO 50.POWER :L j�-� s.•;•Y�'a _ L.125.6). _ -' •" - L Jr'� ��)` NI 7•E- _oP[ ca+c L A _�' _ _ _ _.Y•_ $ \�� LINE MERE ce•.,..s.An�.... '�1 .,- `- A _ PEG.NO 981x1)195Li� •...+�•s •� .�_- _ 1 O a (G :�/ �>"' j<f�.))�?'/ttwl. �' --��= '�I r.'sLDvrm"-•'- -_ - __ �� -1' .7 \_i:s.- ♦-- - - - - "`•= ----♦ =_--`-- - �- ¢O Z \'� , A % •�t,���\ �'`1. I'1 i" -.♦� AEFMAIIf UxMSRNiBED' -'_-_ _ - - _ - -___----� - -- _ ',` — Ex6r r h m O c � YNE x i _ _ -a3= Z lAJ �•.- 1 :v5�_ E SP ` 1\ -.-' \ 9CC. jJ8{MI951 Y r;45 • / �\., h� - - }CO ,- Z —"•--F^\ ER g/1) )1'1 ` r_--\__ _ -'tx,coNcicv . . \ —;:.�_,. \i�' t2'SE°wD. ' .._._.- pZ 0 w ♦; ( 0 z o �..^ ,?:.. j< ~ /-.1`e`' l 4 b /I/ C�EYHAWhY)- " \�- 1 \/J66JOS S.r. i— I co O = a - s'/ -�' L iY'�)� f �if��3',� -�� 0 -z••••--•_ -__.:\----"----\ ``_. '�y _rsr s7Jw I >'. O•ZO fA EWVMUN RBA 4 �'� yam- \\\(/ �!�w ��..._ �ti sr 1 1 3 4,`t,':; �_ =j^ J\� ,,;vl�f X J/• , E7 r'r Y� \ ,•1� "'DM - .. 1.- 2- )i Z 0- C°W LtJ " f•-..- �,RDPO-rl ♦,15-;\ f r, ` EHff Ili -` �® •H �/ �,,: • W° cc r+p,,yy�` B, Q "'re'', u�,\ 'a�aR ��1,�.�;"''� I�'> 5Ei xo¢1 / ,`' c� '�,I I r\ .,x. 4 x t11 n- /` /i/,/ - -..-" _ - — REC.xD 9Bm 1 sq. i / J `- REFUSE/'� _ I _ \\\� U E EN Z •,S�R� � �I 444 A I seliiil9sr- \\';` /9 e / /`/ p ilk�' .`• � �� , \_\ R C.N 91/1 /y am. Y 3 \\`\\ J: 9 .D .,,C n,1 IX BINS �✓�. \��\{{ _ } ,� GNP / 1 ' p Z .'E ,� \\Il10,. nun r a' `�`/ �'/'�y'O. `` ; .� 3s '''" ��� d I' �'" BUILDING A D ,'1 yBL\!! 2.. ., FZ =! \\\\•�\T �` .nooxs a Ja.DD OSF U; ' W d 4. U U tx g€ I°d`�\ IPERIMETERANuscwE „1 d`": I I , • , YES \ \ v � o o3E `�. \ \`` \ -/-� �'"` y' \ = REC:Mo7o5290481 N W rn g C ? l\ SExOlE1-- I ( ' w CO ¢ 7 ,� ) b�\\ -Rc nrEcAc!AMM E tr '' � \_ 4 PERIMETER ♦ f.. .,, prs ... .,/Q_2z1s'1o• 7 a 3 J. ` •wm \ oWlxc ORO: \ / , ♦ . CUTTER. R_)50.00' O V o �\ L.291.i9' Z $ s/'!/ 'B �/I IT k• ° `'..L.exi \ / 21 LaWwc n - 1 y j >= J .. �� co .04' ir / }z12. ./ 4. N W ¢ ''/+• -• .I 1,1 10 �' /".' MRISE / ''''crux II. �. �,/♦ 1 `� �,°,N. '�'°°• YS/ / Eo " `�' �' , /� °wN.cE c«..Nacp \ RE MD. J /p 1 H '1 1A'^ 1y \\,r'/ 1 REFUSE - rl. • -04 E,y{��9, _ X� �• , nnNOtAUETER ',9 • L, / •1 ` •AREA 4}'A-I IBUI CIIIVG.B --_my — ."C/ / /+ 1 'ry/ `\ /.b -- �mimlr PLNGOf Div 1 - t, �/ . , ��7 _,` %>,, O , Jig _ KN .. ri,so POWER 1.f, EAS..:° %i' >'.,t/ �i�, ;:_ ,� = L 1 @ 1 a�s 1 --- / • • ''DEW _ 9 m,.NEE, f /J �w �' G �.o�-- � gg -- - - �— - A1x ACC .---.- - w:'6.0314'O6 .... - - N�;ma;� I ,goy%�51''� _ a r, � -� wg PRD n 3,^°N .� -..._ �_ Sg�R�15�G 4 �,; �r/� �j/ �;1�� Jl�l i - � y .P05 LEGEND IIND MRIER • / N / /,.%_ - µDe.cunER)-_` \`'�\/ { B"Gao (4 A @ • s ' WW CONCRETE PAVEMENT I- .'1 ,.; / ,E ARE DATA,...... _-___ ED-��D9'x0.59'_- -'\;o �c`� `c / / /�l IX6ME 1 )P p1 N15,b J� ,/ .'% SRE AREA: 159E AC _ DEC �R_305].9}' -�� ///''��� PROPOSER CURB MID MITER ,,„,../„..,- - (696,000 SO m\�� VNE t 529.56' ��. -- �_ `� " �� / //I•�rv+[mom L�A.�1;��z __ z COSTING CURB INO GONER / ✓• \ ^ 'y'i\_ `' -" �/ /li lIi''`_+ /� / PROPOSED BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES: \� \` m \c-e_ , � � '( FY I 9 r� iS PROPOSER RETAINING WALL ® -'� :"' BUILDif BUILD.A: 145.200 SF 0: 1455.200 SF `` `.��•`��•_TO fR•10 10Mm0 �Vq� -'�_ -' 10• / / / P:',:s!C`\t 4 SLOPES EOM_TO ORALLOYED:H 5: - _ �C \""�_ G N1 J BUILDING CrC .000 SF PROPOSED: SJ ma IAA7>SC..PE �� i / PROPOSER MONWEM J/ONAL CMG b 9 x PROPO50 m - _ / SIGN __ 8 e God i O GREATER 1NANAO%NS y TOTAL 296.IW SF \�1 /36 J/Z J -0 BwLwxc SETBACKS MOWED- INTERIOR. \\ .,_'-:��51 / I EXPIRES o1 )-ol, AREA OF wx SLOPE-JI.WJ SF � j— wcrtAti''Wvs SEE PAN \� / � z`o� MFERIERDR.(USG ONII� \....-_ L_I6 �1. " ' $ o'FROM cRAD WAY `�� \ pRq CITY OF RENTON NOTES }/ vrnNKwG ANALI$4: 0'FROM TI1BOi ROAD REWIRED: 1081 iO1W SEWLS \` / '• '}'0 pEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC wORK9 1,)ILL OWE ISLES:NE 2N W., 10'ROM OENSON ROAD 121 AOO SrAIIS `\- --.� \ /,I IMMNO MINCE PROPOSED: 254'FROM BENSON RAY(E.PL)TO BAO.A PR 1 0 µ W tT\/' ��r\ A/ - BO'IRON N.PL i°Wr1MNG C ONOEO: 605 Si OORO. " fi]'FRO TAIBOi ROW P/w TO MEMO B 180 COYPACf' , A / CROSSWALKS �;�L\ �LSi IJS'FROM GRAM WAY RP/TO BUILOWG B 2,IS O5K '-�`� '' \ LOADING / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAL _ _ 4 F]RSTNG: 1`8.100 5F STA1L SIZE:9'a.la%I (STW W+0 A CONING) ' - -- cure FLEW PROPOSED, 6B.W0 Si STAB_SIZE:01/'x I6'(LONPACf) )/26/Oo = DRAM _ 4MGCAPE ARM x OF LOT COVERAGE(0011MNG AREA)_II. eEp® BSw REQUIRE& Sx-J4,B00(i0SSO.FF. C .A PPO.NE& ]fi.600 SP(1NIERIOR) / x0 n pmwle 1 --m„�• .._.• - w[cT_l__acr•4. ND:P\sAskpro\))15\Melminory\)225-po0.9 Gate/rime:09/11/2000 08.31 Scale 1.50 palnc2 xrels: Z))25P132))25P1,2))25PS, • • i- 0I. I i5 5I 1i PRELIMINARYGRADING/DRAINAGE_ . _ - j--_;_— 1,r ,.. a =--- .ws+ •- -- `�a�._( J --= ---"- .-���� '�=r /— -- — -- -- EXISTING EDGE. % ', f -/_ J` - QQ:,/ �ttO F PAVEMENT. _ -r, B °•.���- ---X'�- - - —�- �\:ImgSNRBED // //•---`��— z .c - /.� •,yam" _ "' il_'i \ ▪ __ _ -�'-_=—�_- P\ %, i ,..o-..m a t_. - i _ • —_—_ —� a Z CsI .(C, E%ISL.SLOPE 10 / �. - D..L-^�Y1T'1/11 I - 1_ ISi.SLOPE-i0___bg3,sr� `.J _ //Y i_ . -— ` /�s / _ Q Q Cw.7 /\.-\\ REWVN UNMSNRBF➢ i�'/ ...., �C -all I I I =--( -- •'� `5, -✓� =/ �. - \= ` OPEtf.. •. ��/ `Q Z ` y:r.:../ii \ j..... - N"e \\T r —�.:. _ _ -/. RDA.. 3 \� , iS:'-\ \�I Ill --.\Z; � �— --- ys�/ \_ m °CI��i PROP ED // // Zd _ Z ' ' /.� i/r`•� ^� f ii. 'g r i., /�`.� — i' JIEBA'N /' �$ / i o ��, 11II��'' I ////l' iw =:`', / -" \' 'a�+crc— !/' _ \\ QIOF10E�iA'llbl �j'`-�' 3 ZQ ! •_.�.. l .. "L ,1,PROPPaN� 1/l��/// �'''' 1' ^ —�-_ < \� DRa .'�� \\ I' ~/ i�j \` —\_ - �,j {REra m'4ti� // %. .i, L•C`•.-44 /s \ 02.04 y!•0 ��... �i I �\ 1 }m 3 I ,/,-., ,__ -.:: _•�� ���.,%/i -\ '-J ' / • 'i / 't- — -- sou° bi`L:* ��•'- I o(Ti W O CC CC �•/ - k / \L .5 i i1 I I/I- 1 I aC _ - r Fw-s IC •z y. , % i '— .��_.�: ��\\ , r --i i.y/9," ! I 1��' j-ti{+I �-I., \ 'm-. �_.'' 'Q!m '1�'i`•�.\ , ..,� \\ \r..g W //,7 % .�`�� \•_��fii--mi l`` �1//) p 1 r =-_q .-3. 1 111 A _ 1 ;'4 •1 1'7" ' 1 y%/ }1 =_ — I�ST©��D!F(A) '3;` riJL %i/ 1— �'\}`.jl I _ \\\�\STORM .'� 1 La I I I \2_ PIC � U �_' i r /FLOW RESTRIC •- • + w I j l l l l = it s' \\r 1.1.! 1' 1 /11 1:1`.. \` r I // .\\ 'rYPE, I;_ :-+- I I 1 ,1`\ka. .. 7,11 I 1, ..�. `•':., I I R.JJ.o so' :of I %:D%', - S__ �7. . q \ 1' I I I�I'JI''��'�1' III(7/ ..�5(t�. \\ \ 'i%�'iLr -iLl1 1 I l y .' -'-P i - = - 1 �'! i I \ \ \ ' ! \ ' \1 is i tttlll/// fj' iu_ 1 11''iIIjl r', III'11.1 X l I p .4 v '-il t� "*' • \\ \. 14.1 1I z 11i1IR' I II-Fill Iv1y, ;/!',I 1 r .� �s'b'••'•'•' \ 1 9 — 1 ,. z 1 , 82 - '\\ .\" , Ill i � Ilii[ii / All , \ 'l l `$ 'n / w Z "°K..... / I \-, TYPE 1 1 1 II 1 1 I tvp. \:, ,� BUILDING A .. + y.f ,....- Z ›"Z Da `\-rL ;�''•` _,'' I-I/ RWRS �6.J00 csr I •r s�' i. ' FF..360 �� t \ \ 't\� x' \ Q 0 c>C� `; \`11 I Ir.l i �E'' 1'' �\ � , +y 1 � -I o ,� A I r'IT�;.' > A r: I''I o + �\\�, `( ' I''` _.r, 1 I' '11 Ii I+I � � iOa, I�� �4i11� / �¢' L. ql y:'\�y a•i j,__ 1 ,- `_.I'' r \' ,I,r.. i fit�r-,c ,--, ',` /,y -' . '` Fail E o _oy}'i\. '":'' 4-=44f-I-,,'.'I t IE -�•,, 0� •. alifftivisio• i% - �I f- '-1"' 1:Tli„srsk � u b0l1M D" r.:,, , -_a'E' O vz ,�y -a`s :.JI 11 - 1.... ''1- r I \. p.. ay .0\, 'tiY Sr.;h p �'q' D // Z J v �Y / m[L�.r•r�`i�`- I.''�\ I+ i .o I111 \_,-�- �\ ( O m ,..* MM-A 1 I 1 rl 1 'i 1 I 35 -: 14' 1 '' !• / / 1. k,.. I j\fir I %_ `ti / I / B OPFx DbRfiEIE c •• i 1r' �!I I\I,1•LI I11 RME.0 ss 1✓`11 i O- -�,`\ E•ano+ ...// /, souX--`=C\'� �'/- ` mNN•cE CXANru n AZ BUILDING q`'' \ ��,,' 'a ,, I rYPE 1 coROOKS 0 26.J00 ciC ''''DMaIErFJI A' " V et A. �� l 1_!. + DR Y _�`FxIS! 1 v �•\ rF.F..k., ` \ //- -- `;— 5, , 1 474, / Q vwo',Ns.\ , N,ry'.-.I .r1r \ ,..\' _'d �•• ._\ @ -_BUIING \ _ ,,. uDa I I III 40, _ f /L! !P NH '`Rr I •- • i-- —�_ / �C_�-�. �,. . 'r/I - • ^PJ I /� `i_ `=,,�. __ .a POSED KIN, Jy J }}}{77�5 '1'", l / � = '• T-'>_ • t, : 1I/ I POINT OF /73-_ �J LEGEND ` ��y ;. Q B r SPi Emu STORM oven uANNaE aLSDMY - `\,�-„,_ `.',,a .,..`\.`- � -•y%:• DISCHARGE o�Feszz� O a . I W'/%c EAST.STORM ---ems--- -���-„�\ -`oy 4``\U.� �� � faR SILPN f. I.', 7....7 Ea5T.GTCX B451N oCB " •'`� \ \ "l [ Vbpisv O•9J ' o -•1 �d•/ EXIST.GROUND CONTOUR -- ••\`\�\\\\ _Y'�^_I�," �/I I ExPIRES0,-0T-DI V 1 0 I 1 ''¢r ,- EXIST.BOUND •• \• ND SPOT uEw.XDN "'� i-`�'\ CITY OF RENTON ,�••� PROPOSED STORM DRAIN —%LL— EARTHWORK �'71(! DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKA • . � PROPOSED EMBED GRADE CONTOURouw yam.) PROPOSED MIMED GRADE SPOT E URTON CUT VOLUME 15.0D0 CY •� ,•` - -- PROM.)SURFACE ROW DIRECTION FR1 VIXUMC 10.000 CY PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ® •� L PROPOSED TYPE 1 GICN BISBI -•� NOTC F%GVARO WRRut OCRUO uSAOLE WILL I MR -DAM -R/]s/W-- ^wro -- ---- O[UTRIEFD FOR SIR a116 Rruz W,CRML .1(. ' PROPOSED TYPE 9 STORY DRAIN MN -.9E- BE MUM TO AN APPROVED DUMP SITE. -•f. !✓L_ sc. -SW SO roan Bx( _- Att9 7 z ro R w9B m a W D. BEET2 OF 4 Fne P.VIsIproj\Z]25\p•el•m•noo\])25p9m E.9 Dale/rvme 09/09/2000 09,10 Stale 1-50 d...%reia Z77351.E1,725PS.Z7725PI•27725P11. • I. 7-. 7 T PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN • .. --7,-------_______.... --• m,----31 \ -.....-A,'--- \ _----4,D,-, , -.--- / ---.-- ...---- .........--- --------;-- A,,,o. AR. • 's. I L.4,-,--2.-__--------------—--— Z 1Sh -;- ------- s, UNE EASEMENT ' ' -- --- mt„ - __---- c>E0g I 8 T p: ------------.----1---.--b4--J-1. -4-, -11'.1,. '•.„,- ..;')--r-- \:,.2.' \‘-'1fi?:;;:. ::',i--:'''''...'.. -,..,_ ,r-- ..-'-. ..:::-- •E ,. , „ . .,•' _____---.7--__1_4_,-,„ , ., - , , „ i N.„N,...-. •••,...., ,..,, „T._ , , ,...., 111 I >_ / . a0 cc C.0 ' • si I I I 1 '.- I'l I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I r‘/?.‘-,• - •I,= ILI i ' I)/: .dillrisi/ II 'I, '\ .‘ \h tx.rAc,solwItR,, .,-.• •/;. , ,,,,, •• -. , .H _1 11!•; 1 c:Aufritr:i i,"HI 1,.../„.7, i\\ \ ii..,,./),,./iii.,.1,,,ii„, ..iircic.:77:1,,:0:::5,,,i i L. /i,,,,s,„,,,,62,,,;:79,,/-L.:,./..i.,:22:‘,,,,..•,,,,, ,,,.!,,1 ,t ,,,„K\• TT11-777-rin-To /1 Ad.--cco titoR'i i •,- - • —„Li i iTil);;;<, •:;,.-------_' ' ' IL l'iv 1-1'4141`,I i 1.,1 1,'•••1• • \ P,. Ail,ottgli li••,'•I I i 1 r i ', •• •:;:-%,,,!!): N. ..Y (riArLI Jai 1 i c,,„,•.--, Lb-Jaz--1/17_0_ ,,,,---" -:".-- -' !Ii.'11)3/II ------- '''. P',..-CA17/l'/i lit/ iT''' • i'' \\%> I"i '//C.-; ‘' ;-../.' ..,'. ',1 • • • in. i •i.__,,./,-1.L_J i t••,• r,..- s \„:".. \ rrailyjraz,L,I• ii ----•,•-__:-_-L-Lu_lvit,v) •-;• "" ',„ \ , ,,,,:•:,.,:11..17-7'41)j 0,•/, ‘2"-7 '.'y , 1„,,, „ ,., ....„ ,,/::::;:;•;,-;:::1' '01i/ r:i.--',4\' iLL'is7';'-11,, ' >., ' r..Z-1 \• \ ,/ atj 1— j /I r , Ir..,:,\,-,-•!, . #'• '. ,,1 t -"-.g.T.'"N 1 Li - •iV ----- '-i 1 1'`t'I- '-'-'1, ,L :,! .,.. ,.v'': \imkoF,OSED \-ft,,,_„i 0 o l'E •;, '',.,1 t.. 'i.., '' I.,.'-'' *,, 1'',','SAN SEWER `\ ''‘`.. .,%:,•'7 „ , ..,\\\\\ .:. -‘1•;%, c-- BUILDING A E. I ROORS 0 36.300 GSP --- >-.Z .-1,1 , \ 145.200 ' . l'.-.,''\'/I/110.{,10-OFI\ --,‘‘:'',,,'''''-."' /‘•_. '</'''''. ''- ,/';'''' 0 rED .4.7 I fr 36.0 ,\i . " CONNEO W--1 `";.-:.,;'.' ,r-7 '-',"/ .•"' _.: 0 Lo I‘,.`7- i I / i-/ f,:/I!! 1 1,---,,,o,'. \ . o 0 a • •, . iii.,..? 1( , 1 1 1 :i'1..1 ry 7 41'1! t,Li j , i , .... ...,. ...:.e..:,.' ,,,,.//: PROPOSED,/:•.' "'''''.' .:7,/, i I ,-1, s,, ..-. 4 ii gg. \\\•), .---- --„ - g.1,2 d i---- . . cc , u I/7- ,,A,o 0 6ig'6',"•:<;\ I - " •Y •,...:•:::/:-.',...-,/- ', •;-. •1 , - ,.... _- li:,in, ,, .....\,......,/,/ , , A, Ili • I ..,,,., YIN il r--------- .:‘`f"''',7-`, ..,:•:,,if.h ,' .c.: _, \- - ..,-1-JTil /1 - ' ///' .' "f''' co _j ---• 8 I, -,,,.• MANHOLE / ,, '-.7. i 7/ / '/./ / ii 0_//[/_/// PROP I ' I ifir . ; i ( '''':"1'1 ' ' ' • / 0 .-- OsSEwEDER AIIIIIIiir • '-•, ....1--,•,/,'; 1 " • ,••• SERVICE UNE / I.. -------1; Alf i -• ---Ei.-1‘• -±i.. •;:', • ... ' .' ' ../ • SAN.SEWER - - + BUILDING B ,...),ffl PROPOSED - ••••,„.,,_ r_jj I, /MANHOLE ,, '. ......0 36..,OSE e'; SAN.SEWER 140200 LSE / MANHOLE ,..,,, .' ' i'/<:.1/• . • ct _ ,al- --'-- - - / PROPOSED •,.. ' w -- _- .I L.Lail,lim WATER UNEZ r''''' S. Va , .!‘ - \-'13>, ''':'<.??..*:11i—i--- --1•-•,—,----it.) /.... /LI!: '-8'7.. 1:• ';',:kTIT (1/ ' V/ "ULM .„ / ,.. ..• ci i 1 „ ,. -<.,...1 ..„ 0.-__ ,,__ \.-sr a 7 --- BUILDING C -_-SAN-R°.PSs 1:-":'>•>'\''''2;::•,;,'"Illrfr 1/ I it.':;.7:5---;--------' ' c.r. ../.. f". -. ..„'„ •...... ...• 0,.- ' *------------'-''''''',,,O, "---_' I/DTP T T----'' . 7,-- ,,,' .V.-II, / / 'i.,/ •,, '`.-1-. ".•• -." ' - ........ . ,,,. -----,--„.-,,,,-.. .-,:.,,s tkr4L11/ 1 ."?',,M,,,,,p ---------_, I/rg ' ___-_-,,,--,-' •----//i ./ / ,, /' 2(.1, ' ..-'-' ._, - ' I,-/ -,;,.-5-.•::.1-1:111,1 / / / ,,, 1-v\,— ,4, _-<<, - - :iR'.E 11 1 ......,_ ------:-------„_----:---_ -\- ----,-________-_______R • 5' - ..---------. ..------------ ----—._ ._- - -•-.-...L-..PPPCCP,-,..RRRROO-,.EOOOOMS.-7PP.PPT-G'O.IOOO,N,SSSSOG-,,EEEEE D,DDD-WE,N I-ARSSWR'T EA,ADA ER N,NTERHE.., YRHLSSD IYENErRLN.D,M-IE AN..R-- --N, -I-,AN-..-.-N..E,-,-'H.,-_,-O,,-_----.L--_-E-„--------_---,.-----------_-------_.--.._t-...__-,-._-.--._.-.-._---..-.--A__.-a z_•---_.. --.c_ - ,-,--▪ ,-,-_„---„1_-„-..-_--..'..,- ,-..-I --z-z/i-_-1-F-.,-A_•,i3j-._I.,T-_,,.R,_.-1,)-,_O-„TF,::.--,P-I.---.-I-„.---O-,•,-------'S.,,--.,,.-1.E/2.,'.---,-,-i,-,.=.'-_--;'.-,-_'-/•-R'E:-I.--:-.,.Zr":.-.-4.,.--.':-,':-.'.'.,--1,.i-.':1,--A..,.:,'_-.,-..1.,.,--:-..z,.,-,.4----.--„...-'---,,:,,..-,;-.-_:\..--._.--......-_..z1:_:.,_..L...-.•:.1_,-7..'..--.)'_.._",'i:..rj:.,-",C-,%--'.E"-'o%,.ir/0,i..0,....,1 1 i.9,.i-s,••,/-,i,.•i-,vr,./• A"•.r,..,.(.,..•,7j_.-, /,•1//I0/.t /Z ' ./ ,,j/. -"1 s1 1!(1.0 1 7.''',.i'...4.,---7'-1-)..\.K'lie?.,0.-7.1,,',"x'-1:',6IO-7 zE)I F1..R,1AA.-..P'-0,R,,'I'N'vI''TEC4'-''0o',S7I.s V''I'.,T,'I.\.0 E..•‘.1Y'.\-'N,N, ,,,T'O,,,,',•:'4‘,' E.P,UNTBfILOIo_ESCiN-.00l' WgWa•1^i3O,,''.'Ri''.CM,''.7OYSS,S,• --,., EOSINS SW.SEWER UNE ———— . -Y.,.. ,A / - ' 7/ MST=SAN SEWER MANHOLE o ..FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION 8= / 1 . ' mg.., _—_ c,,,, 7/2SLOq___ Fl.0•8 - _ r--- C.. _88,•3 ., I- . (81E2.0 .8 _ 88..48 r•50' Fes,eam __MOE 1 i REVEIOH • ,,,,,„„,,rop72,8„,i,,• \••,,7725,11 d N ln, V..09/09/R000 17.8 U..'. . . ". " . ‘. X .. ;;725P.Z 'S. '"T .''Z77 ' KO , -... i.w M=Vmf/�+•ar/mf-naa ... nlrmrwir/+m/ .,m .. o �m ., m — _- • ' ,_, sD -"`•_` !y Plonning� CITY OF ,RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON ---- • NO. REVISION .- - ® GreggZimmermon PE:`A�m"�t°ePor TREE CUTTING / LAND -"'-`' _ BY DATE APPR I CLEARING PLAN ., ,Il filq< eamN -.�` \ ; -- 2j' }F 1 ♦ \y/ \ '.• ' � j/io,s.. \\ N f� LS I '., m,``•.10.':'..:jt j%�t 1 \\� Z I _ I 1,11 / .. - \ \ " '.\\ —S \€ \ 4 1 . /' 7 \y\ \;.?„ $) \` "�=\. 4, 1II }i I ;' •� -t �� I` l 6 j,�\ \•, \I ' ///(( � w b` Y. \ I 11 1 i , �1 i 1, • •a 1\\\ `! • • a • / --'/ / � � '�\l 1, , m \ / / f, ".,// ;,/, ` A\ // �\ / Aye*I (,//e \ \ ° :4 1 1 / if / ' , // 0 40;,./.. \ \- irt i -7. 7;1 - , 1 II it.:- /, ‘,,,.- '‘,, .--.\ '' q\- 0 i i t iy,:'‘\ `/ R I \ of \! \\3y? ^� • ' I V F tie, \ -•' I I. ,des .-g. 7 ,,,, , 215? I•4 , ii i il z -\ \ I''(� )1 \ f` 41 \/ ice:• . :, \ i / , 4. � = • \ - \\\\ ':_ .;: /. � I ' \ _. _ i / lie N if( ..2.•y:* \., ,.., PF- o. 154. / // 11 ( l 1411 E, --� .. ti ' �s ;`/ ,/ y // l 11 \\\ QA if om. �<,, L / I \\\�\\\\\\ •i 1� a -&,`,,,\• 3 \ r�inN„rn \'R. \\\ \;"'`C:��i♦ ab,6 / — 4 II1A 8,\--i"l-'hIN, 32 _3p j ��• - \ �• VDe / \ 3 .\..,..:\,-,-. • 1II,i,-';J r \,\ 1 1 F g \ ♦ .As. \ 3z IK, V 1 z , • _ fE �.1 ' \ \ •/� �l /� I III/� f 7H. a \ \\ \4 'A \ / i w .p O o 1 c'FFA X°\♦/00C , \\ \ 1\\ -`--'— \ •, J // \'\ �jII1U�i I I �s 8 -S m \` \\' . \oomoim C\V I. e�I g E z GHgV FOR TITLE PQ' tS� 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 3 m Z KENT,WA 98032 OPUS NORTHWEST,LLC .0 p (425)251-5222 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE v (425)25ra782 FAX 915 flBTH AVE SE,ri300 e $ S.W.GRADY WAY e p CML ENGINEERING,UND PUNNING, BELLEVUE,WA 98005 RENTON,WASHINGTON ., X (r C NG\Nty SURVEYING,ENNRONYENLN.SEIMCES (425)453-4400 RCF JO6 NO 7725 • • MY ,.. OPUS. ,r...x • r orate�0ein1 ee : , .,<; � :_-... Or Renton,WA ,. • • September 000 ®fir :,1 � i,1 , i; t • • "� 11 � = to • • r>; «,.r ,v .: 'x:ae •::s.<, _ rr"rat �ris ..... ,.. . 36'Q" mow r r • ,,.. . Y R�� .6, '. ;; :<i:; ,. . ::, rnx , .fi - �"� K,t*�'" a, �: .�e. r : 1 , �ay�,F. �, !> ,�, ..r .. �^id .:.�i � ` ,: :.. 'Y�K'�".�.. ,: ,�� y'�� z::Yt``) .n3.rr ti W .. rtaiZ.� ': ". :: r•. "s..r�:?i:: '�j„... ,:r :'. '�'�?.x^ ..°�.z' Y>": ..:,.:.; fat+, ��::. :.`�Rt 'k<: "s�� '�'' 'r: J.." ;a�,"' y'.;�' ... ..:° rr .. .. ....,. .,▪..._.�•� ./¢-r.•,,:.-. .,. w „• xcr ,_; ,_Y",:; �"x::ws:�Yi <�a<tt ,',�`S:a'M,%f;< rc w ,,• <�.,z"<•; ,"rx:,.�6K'.: :�,":�•.rt .��>! �a s+<, •.,.. "...,�,"5-<. xc.�..��,,,"" ,, :� �:;,I, ,� ��' si '.'s .�"iv.. �%,. ....,�,�" : .< "..•�,'mr :. .. ", ,>,.. ,.,,t.x., c. ,y5,x ". � ,>."�:•�9 :.a� .l. �::SSiL`s� �••x!':{5Y�":`., ^^'^Jt`.?," ."�. ...,5 2,.. ..7"i�< .."• .,.<A.. ..,. ..� xs" yr�r. '^,',.v:, ..: ,,,�'�,�yi:.::;:... ....h/' [ i'�"�i'''i%:.^y ,:'""�"£':�,r:,�~>:� .s,£..'S"��:�'.�.:'.., ,^ s/ • .,, ...:.".'£..,.'S• ,. Yii,,,,,st.r . ..,„: ,;,u<- " ?F 46—;.: x:., :z:q 4 <i:. ".'. r rtry� '.:f3, .� ,., �` ixi ;3J( cj:,..,' ?z .„I,-e:, •iiwt ... .. :R;,,&' :. ,_5.�'.�•.'Uy.<.. : .. ....;'Y.S s:I . k.j i, .k` tv� '3><..�```ir>,Ei'f`' ':`f. " >:fi< �::.L`.<r.,.:> •z. ..: :ink` s r r:. .".rt:.". n.,. ...^'�Y`r< �.t..un:. �..{.t'::.. .. .5:...:>... '.ti,i':,r. ...a,"::��a 1.�:�.>:. C:u.SG.u.'.:: . . ... W.4 ..... �� _,. 3,...<.b •yf,... .. .z,. U :-:;,.. . .< ...an;;....: '�;e£'%„ sra�." t r'» D as n ; F VJ;A::. " r.: Typical N r#he t%Sautlwest.Eievafio/ • ;; '.r;; /,. E. .. s.r..» .., ,t,, s�,�F s.. ... rt, fir.„. .:.!.�:, ,,Y::.':" ;.: .*, : ".;- :.:' `:;> Sl.��:E ui ant Screen.. ':., : `~Fainted Cono'ete Panel::• %,: .:. „: • -[`I "_" .: .... I • TAnd:izedAed GCazing.in :;'' a:' � CCeacAnodlzedAluminumFram€ng r . 5 ' , {, r� ( �I } i�c t� a� F` • t " 1 . • • ,.... 1 ••,•:••••, Ilk: :•,.., ,, r pa� ,,�..: ". .:.,2., „ ..... y 5 'ter. l dt gllll 2 " i :11M till; 'IRfM t i ?I{ -•:•y Mt fli rt NI'M1ii ys 5 w?�<rwear� �y0iy... • F.F.E.-36'-0" .. ;t�a,s wra- __ w I wuwla�wrrw �rr ar�ratn� w as pl war r �I. a ;,z�'...w. ,..s::.' .... '• :: �.'.:iY::'r'?%`�,',:, x,?�, ..� ...� ,.°�� `fx?::h. a t ..."2. `�.%� a �' -,,:, aa"z,.' < ..`: '. .'�" '�' J°��F�; ;'� ."/#%` .x§F'. M"3�>Y'`' ,.,'�@�y#":''4' 'r.'� .4 x t.rr ... ,a? ''�i >sa?z.'k �xu,'.�' ,'(pv� �; aka >�� '� Mom;: ;� W:� ,+i a $+:, At;of ,• .i g r' .Y n .1114.V �� •. ': . ,,. , _" , • ," x7 :rr"t xs" ::� :ems : !: ,.,rr �VI, -^..rn...Y ..„.r "....,. �,> l3�_:. .... ,:," ,<Y ^ "�._,:;r='r:.^." .a "�a�r.�„, ,orj'r•n'- t={�.,, f:3:."" . •.. .�,.br:�l,!""... r '�! ;� ,,. .�,• °z"" =3t a<.. .!:•."..... �. .,. . ..".t',.'s.:'' ,"8,.;..rs: `"�����'ir��; "..�;<I: ?,fh ..". ,,,.•" •.r,!• .^. . r r„<:,,, r ;, ..::,„:...,w, .,'r$."'!*• ^ ,ay. , '✓.,.. 'i :'::>'€'t` :�'3` rift%'w`' '"� ,?<,' ya;".w�.� , , "s,�,'. ..r•: """.- ^,s3"�r",r.: ., c ...<«� .,. .. 5 y � "r:' .° .....,.. ..log' er:. -:�.�rtis« E! a.>`�?>.... ["mr";" ,K <4i.:• r � ,. . "t , <e.i.-:r,-, i.,.. .. ,k, ,, ...y'.4. n,r::. • ^ .....s�:- .'" F .' e ..,/.t., .,Y. ur, ..n..:< ,'�3''?r .> ... r ..>. .:./.... . S '�u^', ,..,iih .... , / CS"s ' ', .... ;rn> ,:,r. �"j�;:'::i� . ., ., . �, .., ,<. :!" ". . .,.,.. s: ,r,. >,.,. -�i9:.rt,,�� ... ...'v ,..,,:... .h<<.>$"r,.... „r<:, /•y;;:< . 'V�9z ,n•:i`r'° cr..r"Y:.�' �;�<' <'�:S'`^i:... . <...,_..."•,.ca ,..,t'"< o<. n,<^ .'r4' . .".:. a _n< , ° , -;.....,.. :X):. .f:;:p;, .>M'.: " .l fy.;P.'.-".'4; .A,'<.:'f'5,.. rt ', !1:e' ...<..<.>.." rtrx"-.. r,.r ...✓r. F„B.:Lsn,.. .. rrr ,.,. ".ei'':`'; r:: :' ' :. .'x..":.?.<2'65',. ..1 ., ..... .. ....�';.�t iFa �„-r.��. as Nr,.s;... ;,.::::' ''s>,<:.,:.,r€`<....,r.�.�."... �..,„.:!. '.:;rwsi ..rxi r�y,..".A o,,�:.'�Hri,.,:� �`m...• :g,,� ,.'�7,pt`s%''" ,Z✓`1N"1 , kp.N;. v>r�,,S- :...,?'£e,. .z<.g'::..".", ,.:^'... . ,r,`�`t. .fiy:... ty zz 3t::.1 ,) .._� , •.`W0. "<;F.. ;i_ :3"i ;'pt^4 U: , • p C W J�'O!]t�le ��0 6 ,.. • Ty i al Norfh est/` as#Elevfiion o 7 0 ommO Northwest Exterior Elevations 0 OPUS. A Development of Opus Northw LLC ..... : , • irti OPUS. .0, Southpointe Corporate Center Renton,WA September 6,2000 ', :. '''' ....' 'fl:, •,..:..••'.. ',:- ,..:;:.- I.-,•::: ' ,, , .:......:....';„ '. - : '.... ........ , :".- ' '.... ' .: : .....' . . , ' . ••••'''. : ' ..,1 . . ,2 , • ' ••:. .,,,..-::.,...i. ....: * 1 !... ' . : r - i -1- -r- -1-- *--.: .. !i . - ..... .. LOBBY I I I I i • • =Corridors/Lobby 30, .,,tf: '..- ':'-''' I I I I . . . ......,,,...... . . 1, : . - .......,..........., '' '' "- 4'1 -Restrooms 1 1- i-i. ../m,. ELEVATORS-- ',-,...a.. : I i I • ',?.4.?1',AP• =Stairs/Elevators ,, . , ,.„,„:,.., . . ......„,—. . . ... . .. I •ir:4 Y.,. ip-. 1 ,..- .. .i.4.4....:. STAIR .1--.. , _ __ ___i______ __ ------"i—- .i. —. - c".':..;'.: sf0,-,;4 =Mech/Elec/Janitor T7. ,.., ,, ___i___ ____: _ _ _ _ _.i Z ....4.4poi - „ I . si•C ST5 "1-• I SPACE I „„- .. ,, , • ';., • s.-.. ".1 •, iia,:., 'ELEC/MECH 1 C''' 1 CORRIDORI WOMEN'S MEN'S' '.-JANITOR' I I ,4,,,,...1.,"a CORRIDOR . ••..:.:, .-. .., . - -- -.; ...,..:. : i - -'t- : ':.;.:..„1, if 1 i i • 300' 1 I. N.T.S. Ii I OFFICE I 1 i i ..,':•,':i.•....'•:...'::::,.• - '',•••.,.„ •';:...',.;•••••:.,.. i b 0: . I •I SPACE 1... •I I I I ... , 1.'2' .•;:.. :• ,:';'..• -.... i . 1 '.......,.....:-....„..,._., ... ,..........,.,- :::„::...,,-,.....,........::.,:,.. ...-.... ... ..„...:.............., ... . ,.., .. .....,.......,.._,...,..-...... ......,:.,.... ....L 2.;,...;';,.; :: . . , .- :- i.,....::.,:;.•;,.:.: - ..;-: .: ,.. ...'.. .,.,..., .,.;,....-, ;:;.-,. ..,,, ::-.. .- ,...::::;.....!.. :,....:..,:, :": .. ...', ::-,...'........ ..:...',•::',;:-''',...'. - .-..y...:'..,.:; ... ... ..,.....:...:-..: ..., ...... ...,.,,,,,......,...... : ..,,:302' .. . . . '• ': ", : . ' . '.. ' .,.. .: . .1'. . . . ': ' , .. :'' . / :,.: , '.....-; 'I:,' NTS 0 15 30 60 [ . . . ' . IIMMIr7NEMME111 I fil.:ell'OPUS., A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Typical First Floor Plan ..::.. ... .::..... . .........:... ..:...... ...... ... :::.:...:...... .. .. .. : s : Pi OPUS. Southpointe :. <. - � Corporate Center - Renton,WA > . . .. : . : . ..., September 2000 6 n 0 e t 2.. ... ....: ....... -Office ce I i I �� <.'� '"``�",:,:..:-..�::.:�..�.::::L-,--:• I I.� • B i • I • • -Corridors/Lobby f I-�;M`�'wl }} • • ,.:ens:.;.. 30, ELEVATORS-. - - %';:I =Restrooms I I' TYP. 1 I I I I CORRIDOR• I I I • .�.STAIR I I I I =Stairs./Elevators t _ CORRIDOR ___ � '' I "..:,I "� �"„ i.l.. l�'" — --..,:�'---»--.--,,,-• --.,, .-.,,. -.r.�--�-•- •—,r'^.--°�. „—.I..�. ,.-r �£STAIR - ui' - =Mech/Elec/Janitor i's a A. fi ''. F • k ;r..... i�I' P v� _' I Ui o Z f r[��t I .... c�r :._ f. � v F �I . I Z I OFFICE I .' Z 1 : • I 4: •I OFFICE I li. s: I ' •ELEC/MECH SPACE L„3, >>^ SPACE ELEC I . .I I WOMEN'S-'� MEWS' JANITOR I. I . - I • E • si , !' .I I _ I I N.T.S. I I I ; I I I I I I I • - I 0 • • d, :i`7:': >'.i:!:r t • '.v OFFICE ...a: '. I • 'I M- i -'I i SPACE I I • . _I I • I I I I I I I I `302 • • y 0 15 30 60 OPUS .;r< w::- -- : - .• A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Typical Second Floor Plan „ CITY.' F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.;Administrator October 31, 2000 • Mr. Jay Grubb Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215—72nd Avenue South — Kent,WA 98032 SUBJECT: Southpointe Development LUA-00-124,SA,CU,ECF Dear Mr.Grubb: This letter is to inform you that the;comment and appeal periods have a ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. - As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers at City Hall, November,7, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, ” Lesley Nishihi Project Manager • Puget Western, Inc./Opus Northwest, LLC/David Jackson • FINIA1 I TR 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 - This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer King County DEVELOPMENTCITY OF RENTON PLANNING Wastewater Treatment Division 2 Department of Natural Resources OCT 5 2000 King Street Center 201 South Jackson Street _ RECEIVED Seattle,WA 98104-3855 October 23,2000 Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: Southpointe Development(LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF) Dear Ms. Nishihira: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the October 12,2000, Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated for the Southpointe Development. King County requires that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer.system;,any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building,remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of new construction;however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing fixtures. ' In an attempt to remedy this problem,we are sending this reminder to you in response to the Mitigated DNS. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms: Please be sure that a Non-Residential Sewer Use Certification form for the above project is completed and sent to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should be sent to Eunice Verstegen,Capacity Charge Program,KSC-NR- 0501,at the address above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program,please call Eunice at(206)684-1740. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, : -.411111,1 10 Barbara Questad Environmental Planner • cc: Eunice Verstegen, Capacity Charge Program CLEAN WATER -A SOUND INVESTMENT • Opts, unrest L.L.C. /� 915-118th Avenue SE /1 OP�S® Suite 300 o6-fr Bellevue,WA 98005 C/®per 44- Op if> 425 453 4100 Fax 425 453 1712 t. 4A, 0 October 17,20004° Lesley Nishihira Associate Planner Development Services Division City of Renton RE: Waiver of Benson Road Improvements Lesley, Per your request,Opus Northwest would like to formally request a waiver to improvements along Benson Road for the following reasons: • An elevation change of over 30 feet exists between Benson Road and our proposed development. This sectional change creates a strong disconnect between the two areas. • No portion of the improvements'designed for Opus Southpointe will abut Benson Road. Our design leaves a tree-land buffer ranging from 50 to 200 feet in width along the southeast property line. ■ The buffer mentioned above will not be included in the purchase and sale of the property. This portion of the site will remain under Puget Western's ownership. In sutmnary,Opus Southpointe lacks a clear connection to Benson Road,and thus should not be held accountable for any future improvements. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions about our justifications in this matter. Sincere PJ S R to Representative • • Opus Northwest,L.L.C.is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Atlanta,Austin,Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Houston,Indianapolis,Kansas City,Miami,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Orange County,Orlando, Pensacola,Philadelphia,Phoenix,Portland,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington D.C. ii ra. 24/00 12:03 FAX 425 453 1712 . OPUS NW LLC 111 002 - —..' OCT-1z-2000 1t_ _. _ _ 4..._.24 CI1 - _F RENTON 15 430 7300 P.01/01 fFtTN : pi-.SoVNTVS • . QP VS _Oa . . . . • • APPLICATION FOR . '' CITY OF RENTON • • RECiE® 1 � � • CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 9.8055 OCT 2 4 2000 - • . (425)430-7204otLl�iIvlri.l?IVtSION.' _f________— _. ��� 0-� � � • OWNER �(� `� w 9 Telephone ADDRESS OF?PROPERTY Zip Code LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY includcKing County Assessors#: ' (attach separate street of papa If accessory) ,0 6, • • NAME OF PROJECT: ON 1 I-10 i ki It APPLICANT: 6 3 r ID m oP YD tiMJ r 6,g4 5,q 61m .5 He'A e - gel 007Telephone 61I 12/. _ BUSINESS ADDRESS:: Zip Code etephone Attach a separate letter stating in detail: 1. The request 2.• Applicable City Code 3. Items and quantities involved 4. Justification for request 5. Time allotment required for request. Attach a 1"= 100' drawing of your site and mail the completed.application and map to: CITY OF RENTON Board of Public Works - Paul Lumbert,Coordinator 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 You will be contacted if application is incomplete Mondaytf aditional information is required. will be placed on the agenda approximately 2 weeks COMPLETED applications received by 5. from that date.Applicant's Signature GA� toI�` � /e2________._.---------O 1 1•4 '+1 DATE OF FILING: (Office Use OulyJ DATE OF HEARING: DEFERRAL ( ) New ( ) Extension VA.RI__.SCE ( ) New ( ) Extension ( ) UNDERORONn1NG ( ) DRIVEWAY Offsite U • ( ) SLOPE GRADES ( ) NOISE Onsite MESS /W ( ) • • FORM attoaao 10197 11:\rti.e.sYS 104181BPW012a.DOGN TOTRL P.01 10/24/00 12:04 FAX 425 453 1712 OPUS NW LLC 1004 I i • EXHIBIT A _ Legal Description: All those portions of Blocks 1 and 2,including the unnumbered tracts adjoining the lots In Block 1,Walsworth's First Addition to Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats,page 23,Records of King County, Washington,lying Southerly of South Grady Way'and Northeasterly of Talbot Road South; TOGETHER WITH those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South 8'"Avenue vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No.2850,which attached thereto by operation of law; TOGETHER WITH Revised Parcel"D"of City of Renton a Lot ten;Adjustment No.LUA-98-164-LLA as recorded under Recording No.9812109014,Records of King County,Washington; • • • Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement Initials Initials Renton Complex Site P&SA-OPUS 2.DOC 8- • CITE DF RENTON ..iL 4 >> Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 12, 2000 . ,. Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 • Olympia,WA 98504-7703 . , Subject: Environmental Determinations _ Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on October 10,2000: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED • SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT , LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF . . The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, . landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing • unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on:Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. Location: 915 South Grady Way. . Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 30, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, . . Lesley Nist . Project Manager • cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries ` David F. Dietzrnan, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp.of Engineers 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 -CITY L F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works-Department. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • October 12, 2000. ".Mr:Jay Grubb _ : .:Barghausen.Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215-:72"d Avenue:South Kent,:.WA 98032 SUBJECT:- °-Southpointe Development Project No: LUA-00-124,SA,CU,EC'F Dear Mr: Grubb: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)and is to advise you that .they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on October 10, 2000, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or,before 5:00 PM October 30, 2000. ,Appeals must be filed in;writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,'Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of:Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8=110.0.;Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton"City Clerk's Office;(425)430-6510. ' A Public Hearing will beheld by the Renton^Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor:of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way; Renton;Washington, on November 7, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site plan. The applicant orrepresentative(s)of the-applicant is required to be present at the public hearing: A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do:so. If you have any. questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. • For the Environmental Review Committee, • Lesley Nishihira :. . . Project Manager , cc: Puget Western, Inc./Owner Mr. David Jackson/Party of Record I°7 nlo1 yt?PL- LLG Enclosure dnsmletter • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • • _ CITY OF RENTON • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest LLC. PROJECT NAME:- Southpointe Development..: • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and • Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction :of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. 'The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating.15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed.50 feet), which is subject to special review • criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to' reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way • -MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. " The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above the previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the • review and approval of the Development Services, Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. • 3." The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be - given for the existing buildings on the site. : 4.. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the previous trips to the site. • . 5. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between - South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. :The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the • • City..- The'City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards. the Traffic - - • Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. • MITMEASURES • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION:OFNON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED)`' : . :ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION-NO(S): '' :'. : • LUA=00-124,SA-H,ECF. APPLICANT: , OPUS Northwest LLC PROJECT NAME: • -: Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL:.. The applicant:is requesting :Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one.fi,000 square foot commercial/retail building. : The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements..: The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures,'would be included with the proposal: Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the..property would require the 'removal of 37 trees, as Well as earth'work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes.a.' request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review . criteria. The applicant also seeks approval 'of.a Modification from the parking.regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces.. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South"Grady Way • Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided.in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject-to the- appeal process for environmental determinations.• Planning 1. Two full sets of revised plans, as.well as PMT reductions and one colored display set, must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing: "" Airport 1.. The proposed site is located beneath a primary aircraft traffic pattern area, subject to high usage. Low flying aircraft transit this area, both ascending and descending, and the applicant must be made aware that this will continue, and that occupants should be made aware of this fact prior to leasing. • • Fire • = 1. The preliminary fire.flow is 4,000 GPM for each building. One fire hydrant is required within -feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of each structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler standpipe, and fire. alarm systems. : : • 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building exteriors. Roadways must be a minimum width of 20 feet, with a'turningradius of 45 feet on the outside and 25 feet on the inside.- 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals'that are to be used• or stored on site:_• • ADVISORYNOTE3 Southpointe Development LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(continued)`.• , Page2of2., Plan Review-Surface Water • 1. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control ,plans shall •be .designed in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. ':Surface Water SDC fees based.,on $0.129/square foot of net increase impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. • Plan Review-Water 1. Any new water main, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (fire control system) must meet fire flow requirements as well as current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. • 2. New water meters must meet current UPC standards. 3. Water SDC fees of $0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credits would apply. Plan Review—Wastewater 1. The new building will be required to connect to existing sewer with sidesewer permit charges of $80.00 per connection. 2. _:.Wastewater SDC fees of $0.078 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credit Would apply. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Street improvements on-all roadways abutting the site will be required (Benson Road South, South. Grady Way, and Talbot Road South). South Grady Way and Talbot Road South have existing curbs, gutters sidewalks, street paving and street lights in place. Benson Road South needs full street improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights, installed on the project frontages. However, these improvements could be waived by the Board of Public Works. Please contact Paul Lumbert at(425)430-7304 for application and process information. 2. New driveway access will be limited to 2 on Talbot Road South (south-full access), north (right-in, right-out) and 1 on South Grady Way with alignment to Williams Avenue South. This access is required to have a new traffic signal installed with'the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic study that is under review by City Staff. - 1. Please'note there are existing.overhead utility lines' along Grady Way & Talbot Road where proposed landscaping (trees) are shown on the.landscape.plan.. More detailed plans are required in order to support the installation of trees under overhead utilities. 2. The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping installed within the public right-of-way. Building •' 1.` Methane gas"mitigation may be necessary. • ADVISORYNOTES NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF Environmental review for construction of two office buildings and one commercial building. Location: 915 So. Grady Way. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 30, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers at City Hall, November 7, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: October 16,2000 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest LLC PROJECT NAME: Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 30, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 16,2000 DATE OF DECISION: October 12, 2000 SIGNATURES: 4 /000 Greg Zimm( r DATE /j z_1 Department f Ian ng/Building/Public Works //.2/60 i SheP he Administra or DATE Community Serv. s /ZL / Lee eler, Fire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsign CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest LLC PROJECT NAME: Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as. earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above the previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the existing buildings on the site. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the previous trips to the site. 5. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the City. The City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards the Traffic Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. • MITMEASURES • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED _ ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S) .: ° LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF. • APPLICANT: OPUS Northwest I_LC PROJECT NAME: = Southpointe Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:. . • The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and, Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction Of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A • office buildings and One=6,000square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking 'and street frontage improvements. The demolition"of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the'removal of 37 trees, as well as earth-work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic.yards of fill. The application includes a. • request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special.review _ criteria. The applicant also..seeks approval:of a modification,,from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 915 South Grady Way Advisory Notes to Applicant:: The following notes are supplemental information provided•in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the - appeal process for environmental determinations: Planning 1. Two full sets of revised plans,.as•well as PIMIT reductions arid one colored display set, must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing. Airport 1.. The proposed site is located beneath a primary"aircraft traffic pattern area, subject to high usage. Low flying aircraft transit this area,:both ascending and descending, and the applicant must be made aware that this will continue,'and that occupants should•be made aware of this fact prior to leasing. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of each structure. • : 2. Separate plans and permits are required for,the installation of sprinkler , standpipe and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building- exteriors. Roadways must be a minimum width of 20 feet, with a turning radius of 45 feet on the. outside and 25 feet on the inside. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used - or stored on site: • ADVISORYNOTES Southpointe Development LUA-00-124,CU,SA,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2of2.. Plan Review—Surface Water 1. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control ,plans shall be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by.the City of Renton. 2. Surface,Water SDC .fees based an.$0.129/square foot of net increase impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. • Plan Review-Water 1. 'Any new water main,.fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (fire control system) must meet fire flow requirements as well as current Fire Code/Regulations per the'City of Renton Fire Department. 2. New water meters must meet current UPC standards. 3. Water'SDC fees of $0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid.. Redevelopment credits would apply. ' , Plan Review—Wastewater 1. '.The:new.building will be required to connect to'existing'sewer.witl sidesewer permit charges of. $80.00 per connection. 2. .. :Wastewater SDC fees of $0.078 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credit Would apply: Plan Review-Transportation 1. Street improvements on `all roadways abutting the site will be required (Benson Road South, South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South): South Grady Way:and Talbot Road South have existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights in place. Benson Road South needs full street improvernents,-curbs, gutters,sidewalks, street paving and street lights,installed on the project frontages. However, these improvements;could be-waived by the Board of Public • . Works. Please contact Paul Lumbert at(425)430-7304 for application and process information. 2. New driveway access will be limited to 2 on Talbot Road South (south-full access), north (right-in, right-out) and 1 on South Grady Way with alignment to Williams Avenue South. This access is required to have a new traffic signal installed with the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic study that is under review by City Staff. - Parks 1. Please note there are existing overhead utility lines' along Grady Way & Talbot Road where proposed landscaping (trees) are shown on the landscape.:plan. More detailed plans are required in order to support the installation of trees under overhead utilities. , 2. The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping installed within the public right-of-way. . Buildinq ' 1. Methane gas mitigation may necessary. ADVISORYNOTES - • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00.124,SA-H,ECF The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two,4-story,145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building.The project Includes Installation of utilities,landscaping,parking and street • • frontage Improvements.The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Enemy structures would be Included with the proposal.Access to the site Is proposed via three driveways,including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way.The development of the property would require the • removal of 37 trees,as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill.The application Includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which is subject to special review criteria.The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations In order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces.Location:915 South Grady Way. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. - Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 30,2000. Appeals must he filed In writing together with the required 375.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of , Renton,1055 South Grady Way;Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on November 7.2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the'Conditional Use Permit'.If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal wilt be heard as part of this public hearing. ram, } T�.i .fi.Q:i,�a� 1 T'V' Soulhp nto ‹, OZAWV,A2Vlit —.1. ,t. S A .;'ice tf�iy�' jvy, . odors. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7270. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pldase'.include.the project NUMBER wherrcalling fo(properfile identification CERTIFICATION d r ee De F).4 f.?44,3 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property. on . Qc.* 13, Zoo c.) Signed: lies, ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing in cku2,7 -i-977 , on the a?6'17' day of d tTaf— ) AMC6 nd-F STATE OF WWAS HINGT ON MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES • to MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29 03 JUNE 29, 2003 STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE October 10, 2000 Project Name: Southpointe Applicant: OPUS,Northwest LLC File Number: LUA-00-124, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. The demolition of the existing unoccupied Puget Sound Energy structures would be included with the proposal. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height (three feet over allowed 50 feet), which is subject to special review criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. Project Location: 915 South Grady Way Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: 81,241 sq. ft. (to be demolished) Proposed New Bldg. Area: 296,400 sq. ft. Site Area: 15.98 acres Total Building Area gsf: 296,400 sq.ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M). • N /,'-.. tar, -v e $OPUS. It / ,p\ry p`o, ''-' �,' 0"4, "`�<4/tea ��s'�", >"" • Southpointe 1 ti,,, •/ ` \ t 4 e � Awv�> 1v/ �;.,.zo«'ww� „,N, Corporate Center Renton WA . ♦,. S` \ ��. , _.,e,wi � b4, 0z August 3,2000 ti N. ,// ! ' —'''''"" ice caaor wa 4- ,/, 40 4 $' •��Q •fps. k O • ���� . ' ••Ali4- c e ti r\\ \ .:° •.gib ° f*-Al. , 1:-\\ \ , .,... ..,,,:-,: 44Itio> 441. , -Kw. /...,• , ditio*,.,„.., c.,..., .‘ , ,. , ,_., 4r- , ,-- .--- ,, .. 4'4' "\ ' ''' 1* -'''Atli'c----.,,,/ / '''''' ,.....0 \ e / 4,,b,+,117( -tr ,-, , ,�`\'„C.. fir ,�' _,.s " gig,` '`.3 . r C ��. ,C‘Znik. e4 Project Locatio$ "R , ^ ..4 , \ \ `'<. ,' a.‘.p'_zt..ec ercrpt _ 0 50 300,-�0 OPUS. ._______. •. ._--..._ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report ' SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF OCTOBER 10,2000 Page 2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. 2. The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above the previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the existing buildings on the site. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. 5. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the City. The City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards the Traffic Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. Two full sets of revised plans, as well as PMT reductions and one colored display set, must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing. Airport 1. The proposed site is located beneath a primary aircraft traffic pattern area, subject to high usage. Low flying aircraft transit this area, both ascending and descending, and the applicant must be made aware that this will continue, and that occupants should be made aware of this fact prior to leasing. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 additional hydrants within 300 feet of each structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler , standpipe, and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building exteriors. Roadways must be a minimum width of 20 feet, with a turning radius of 45 feet on the outside and 25 feet on the inside. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. Plan Review—Surface Water 1. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. Surface Water SDC fees based on $0.129/square foot of net increase impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. Plan Review—Water ercrpt F3 • 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 ix_ .,_ 4x, i + + t + + 4++t++++•//+:* *++Fh/+,t ____ x r_S 7�1i- \- •1++* + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � -+ + # + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + # lef0 + t + + + ,+ + + # + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 00 +*. +A++++ +++*++*+++*++ + ++* p•°- +++ + +++++ ++++++++++S++li ritbri Village P1. i - iwi°a :*+*+#+ +*+#:+:+++++*++++ + + CO -1 A i .cc-__ r ` — NN, • 1 t- Tt cy \ O \s 1!5i,h st�-_ __- i �$ i ON CN z • z -- ■ I i �_ ril _ ' - • N _ --[- L _ -- — F ` — zn -00- t - i G • er tf)-- _.___! 9__L_______ ____.._. co, ,_ , , \ N. - -- - ', _..1_._}_�_ s .itr_—st. -- _._ �._ Iith_1 - I w S 19th -St-- _ ---`\- -- : _-__ ::RI-8- I 1 I - I-sr- —, i , Ili it I � I i i T_` - ' 1 - — ---- R-8 0 R-1 \\,-[ ; nr + • __ i o S21tSt- , _:7 . ____---I ,7 i ms c,, NN. r,\ , , i_ 1 _ \ I R / / n1 n \I /1 � . H3 • 30 T23N R5E E 1/2 , ° G3 os�T °� ;ZONING • 1 ^ + + 'P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES • . SA" ,to 1 /oz 19 T231N',R5E E 1/2 ZONING MAP BOOK DI 93L ,) :::ti:4661 it vi,,,,, riir ,,,v 459 i ,,,....,...7.-;,‘.._ ;:—, 2 ..•.ICi r .,_._ ---„, . i L J -_- _-_ -- ^`--• LJ�� -- _ _ I n .dW '/v _ . f y. I i-' k� �„ r C = ::::":>>:: Sri7 .. �Iqc �' /`j� ; , . 1-.:1 :I gi ::E :::-; : 1 4 4. EI30_• N-�-:-::.-: i- ��.,24I ,.Et, l R' ::aa:4_ l-::i::>:::: �fid1Y .•, S'; 26 T24N!R5E r� _ I 7.13,--_ '464 NI .................: ...............: ..... ....... i'1i ,� I TM-- t.' - A � q5 � w I 3. 1:R!5�; .z£ ��� I✓• � , - Fr- a .��. •R 5 E I :Ti24N R5E 5 E i - � {� f - -- -IBEISKIgigalid `0'•.jt ir ;0.1 i' , �momlt- � TwI III. i �\ �. � �r' l I ti �1I J 5 . - I s�1 \ :. i 1 �f - - 1 I �•-� ► 0 . , V • • o : . )v ' i 31 te R5i.aid. 2 T23N R5 19- 1 lo 6 Ci.,,•-4,2 0i9,1 4 5 ` i\ !" efie, w.J u Io ,-.,I _ 1.i---Js'a:_._. I ` • i • l� pig . � 41t,„-tt 1 I� •4\ � (J � � ),46 i..�1yp■iI f:IY{ IA,. I ° IT �1 piI,.,,,14•46,_ 1111.11Sv,,,,„ J ,Iimi- ilp,I:II.F...•. .T97R-t•*, • 1 - - i I II SI�1.\ v. F� 1 lop �V+l .n�`yll 1 iff` ew .:.v up, 11 JIJ RS/ I EL 1R. �911 23��1 R5E 1 ;„, 4110 \-, .'" , _ -....--,-, kfty::' — IA, .. ` \ / - F{,�l I / a�vGkl li�ts /11 -._ 5i 'i,`F pn ryl f k��t� �.. __ 1 - - E 8- 3 .11!lf LA rIl(l �S) SE 16 T2 ;Fi$E 1 T2 j - . •[ (i�r,2$, r SE i :I . ,� '�,�3 l 5 �� ! • �ll�r, 5V� lea 371 81� `` c 4 ' . I r l 10'} 111 [1611g � �` I, _— ', 11 T2 N R' �. '' +" • I" 23T23N R5E 5► I 1• tit •T23 rti _ °--'- ;� v 22 T23N RSfa� l ) 7j'Eii �� 1 ape � u1 'a��[_ • ¢' f .t �� r_II .I.,I 'K `'it _ , r,, dr .' ti l 1 H: Ji %�I OI 23''�7• ,� .. 5 I �j 5E . Q - °�;51' r if 0 !• �, s',1 ,, I IG :: 8251 --, , i'f i7iij- M'ill_ �36;le3N R' -1 N . 3If3 II 5E,,i . •3N R� . -223N1r 5E 135 T23N-�_ 11 o-I �I. 6'II - '-_ —= 60: I ' � .01 6' . ` k9t, ��f ;'I. '' 833 : --1 J. J� (. �I J _ 22N R4E 6T2.111-I5E: 22 ,' E-, .5 -'-I'E 33T2. R•EI ,-• ,II 2T22N R5E : _:` KROLL RC I Resource Conservation .CC Convenience Commercial <P7 Publicly Owned ( ,' ' '�i I R-1] Residential 1 du/ac CO Center Neighborhood• Renton City Limits 4.1..0'1 E ' IR-5 I Residential 5 du/ac • Cs Center Suburban* -•-'-'- Adjacent City Limits IR-D]Residential 5 du/ac CD Center Downtown* I 1'-I (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/TOWN/RANGE l RMH I Residential Manufactured Homes CDR Center Office Residential Ng Automall District A I R-IO I Residential 10 du/ac C. Commercial Arterial I•;•:•;I Automall District B R-Ia I Residential 14 du/ac CO Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts u not shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. ) I RM-I I Residential Multi-Family Infill [H Industrial - Heavy 0 x I RM-NJ Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center DI Industrial - Medium PAGE L., ? MI Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center IL' Industrial - Light en INDEX i IRM-UI Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* P-I Public Use o o O f City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental R v Committee Staff Report SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF OCTOBER 10,2000 Page 3 of 6 1. Any new water main,fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (fire control system) must meet fire flow requirements as well as current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. 2. New water meters must meet current UPC standards. 3. Water SDC fees of $0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credits would apply. Plan Review—Wastewater 1. The new building will be required to connect to existing sewer with sidesewer permit charges of $80.00 per connection. 2. Wastewater SDC fees of $0.078 per square foot of gross site area will be required if not previously paid. Redevelopment credit would apply. Plan Review—Transportation 1. Street improvements on all roadways abutting the site will be required (Benson Road South, South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South). South Grady Way and Talbot Road South have existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights in place. Benson Road South needs full street improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights, installed on the project frontages. However, these improvements could be waived by the Board of Public Works. Please contact Paul Lumbert at (425) 430- 7304 for application and process information. 2. New driveway access will be limited to 2 on Talbot Road South (south-full access), north (right-in, right-out) and 1 on South.Grady Way with alignment to Williams Avenue South. This access is required to have a new traffic signal installed with the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic study that is under review by City Staff. Parks 1. Please note there are existing overhead utility lines along Grady Way & Talbot Road where proposed landscaping (trees) are shown on the landscape plan. More detailed plans are required in order to support the installation of trees under overhead utilities. 2. The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping installed within the public right-of- way. Building 1. Methane gas mitigation may be necessary. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The area proposed for development is relatively flat with elevations between 20 to 22 feet. In addition to the abandoned buildings, the site is predominately developed with asphalt concrete pavement and some smaller gravel-surfaced areas. The south side of the property consists of a large, relatively flat gravel- surfaced area at an elevation of 18 feet. The east side of the property is vegetated with blackberries, brush and deciduous trees. Soil conditions on the site consist of 5 to 15 feet of fill comprised predominantly of coal tailings overlying soft and loose alluvium with underlying sandstone bedrock. The SEPA Checklist submitted with the land use application indicates the development of the property would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material would be removed from the site as a result of project construction. The subject site currently consists of predominately impervious surfaces. Therefore, potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. The eastern boundary of the property abuts Benson Road South, which is approximately 30 to 40 feet above site grades. This area contains steep slopes ranging from 30%to 46%. The development of the parking area at the northeast side of the property would require the alteration of the lower sloped areas in order to create surface parking for the project. The sloped area proposed to be disturbed has a vertical rise of 12 feet and plateaus for a width of approximately 15 feet before the steeply sloped area continues up to Benson Road. Due to the vertical rise of this area, the slopes do not qualify as "protected" slopes and are not subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations, including the prohibition of slope disturbance. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental R v Committee Staff Report SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF OCTOBER 10,2000 Page 4 of 6 The lower sloped area would be graded for the construction of retaining walls. The majority of the retaining wall would have a height of 3 feet above the finished surface elevation of the parking area. The highest point of the retaining wall, which would cut directly into the sloped area, would be 18 feet in height. As the wall follows the top of the slope, the height would decrease to 7 feet. The application submitted included a Geotechnical Report prepared by GeoEngineers dated October 15, 1999. Because the report was prepared for a previous project, the application included a letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., which states the report is still valid for the current proposal. The report states the site is suitable for development with the use of pile foundations to adequately support the building and includes several recommendations regarding site preparation and construction. The August 5th letter concurs with the recommendations contained within the report — all of which staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with in order to mitigate potential erosion and slope stability impacts from the development of the site. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Study dated October 15, 1999 prepared by GeoEngineers, as well as the supplemental letter dated August 5, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., with regard to the disturbance, preparation, and construction of the site. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Water Impacts: A Technical Information Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, dated September 9, 2000, was submitted with the land use application. According to the report, the site currently does not provide on-site detention/retention of storm water, nor provisions for the treatment of runoff prior to its release to the downstream drainage course. The proposed project would involve the design and construction of a new on-site storm water system to control storm water runoff in accordance with City of Renton requirements. The drainage control system would consist of a collection/conveyance system and a biofiltration swale for the treatment of storm water prior to its release. Based on the KCSWDM, the on- site storm system would not require a detention/retention facility. According to the report, the project would only slightly increase the current amount of impervious surface area, thereby resulting in a nominal increase in the rate of storm water runoff from the site. However, based on comments received from reviewing departments, this area has documented down stream flooding problems. Therefore, any increase in the release rate above pre-development conditions should not be permitted. Staff recommends this requirement as a mitigation measure in order to prevent potential flooding impacts from the development of the site. There is an existing drainage channel or stream, an unnamed tributary to Rolling Hills Creek, that flows across the east and south sides of the site in an open concrete channel, 4 feet wide by 3 feet deep. The course of the stream was identified in a previous environmental review application for remediation activities on the Puget Sound Energy site. The drainage channel originates at the top of a ravine, southeast of 1-405, near the intersection of Grant Avenue South and South 18th Street, approximately 3,000 feet southeast of the subject site. The drainage carries storm water partly in an above-ground channel (unlined) with occasional subsurface (piped) sections toward the bottom of the slope. The drainage channel enters a 3-foot-diameter steel culvert that directs the runoff beneath 1-405. The culvert daylights beneath 1-405 onto the east boundary of the subject site, discharging into a concrete sedimentation basin and then into the concrete lined drainage channel across the subject site. The channel exits the southwest corner of the site through an arch culvert (60"X 42"CMP)located beneath Talbot Road. The existing Puget Power facility is paved right up to the concrete channel, there is no existing vegetated buffer. The project would involve the creation of a biofiltration swale within 25 feet of the drainage channel. The proposal would not directly impact the stream, and the applicant proposes to leave the concrete channel intact. The City's Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations requires a 25 foot buffer from streams, However, no vegetation would be removed within the required buffer area. Therefore, a variance from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations is not necessary. A Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Natural Resource Consulting, dated September of 1999, and accompanied with a letter (also prepared by Natural Resource Consulting), dated August 8, 2000 was submitted with the application. According to the report, no wetlands were identified on the property. There are wetlands located adjacent to the southeast border of the site, which would not be directly impacted by the development proposal. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF OCTOBER 10,2000 Page 5 of 6 Mitigation Measures: The development of the project shall not increase the storm water release rate above previously developed conditions. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 3) Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction area, applies to all development in the City. The applicant would receive credit for the existing buildings on the site that would be demolished by the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the existing buildings on the site. Policy Nexus_SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 4) Transportation Impacts: The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system and, therefore, is required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit is given the previous use of the site. For the proposal, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at$223,050.00 (3,676 new trips—702 previous trips =2,974 net trips x$75 per trip = $223,050). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Street improvements on all roadways abutting the site would be required (Benson Road South, South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South). Access to the site is proposed via three driveways—two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The northerly driveway on Talbot Road is proposed approximately 400 feet south of the Grady Way intersection and would be limited to right-in/right-out turning operation. The southerly driveway on Talbot Road would be located approximately 360 feet south of the northerly driveway and would operate with full- turning movement with the westbound approach to be controlled by a stop sign. City staff has approved these driveways as proposed. However, the driveway proposed to serve the site from Grady Way was found to be unacceptable to the City due to safety concerns as stated consistently by City staff during initial discussions regarding the subject proposal, as well as with previous development proposal's for the property. Section 4-4-080.1 of the City's Driveway Design Standards prohibits the construction of hazardous driveway.locations. Therefore, the only viable driveway location along Grady Way would be at the intersection with Williams Avenue South. After consultation with City staff, the applicant has agreed to revise the location of the driveway on Grady Way so that it is located approximately 105 feet west of the site's east property line and would align with Williams Avenue as required. In addition, the analysis of this access point indicates that the new intersection between Grady Way and Williams Avenue warrants the need for a traffic signal. City staff will perform intersection and signal analysis to determine the fair share contribution between the City and the developer toward the cost of signal installation based on private benefit verses public benefit. The required signal must be constructed as part of the proposed development project, with the City's contribution towards the signal cost to be credited against the required Traffic Mitigation Fees. The applicant will be required to submit a full set of revised plans indicating the new location of the driveway on Grady Way, as well as the inclusion of a traffic signal, prior to the preparation of staff's report to the Hearing Examiner. The satisfaction of all traffic circulation issues, including driveway alignment, will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and will be addressed through staff's recommendations to the Hearing Examiner on the proposed site plan. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Credit shall be given for the previous trips to the site. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report SOUTHPOINTE LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF OCTOBER 10,2000 Page 6 of 6 2. The applicant shall install a traffic signal at the intersection with the subject site between South Grady Way and Williams Avenue South as part of the development project. The applicant shall make the fair share contribution to the cost of the signal as determined by the City. The City's portion of signal cost contribution shall be credited towards the Traffic Mitigation Fee imposed on the project. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 6,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ercrpt ....., ..... , .., ..„..,..:_.„.,,,..;:......„1,.,,,:;....:....:;,..,.......„1*. i.,1,,,,,,,'•cw••,f.t•'•4•',.T,i6'•::.V„,,,,-,•ii4''.,,',A'.-.,N+'.:,g,',,',•,,••5,i,'.q,.;:••.•',-.'l..,1•:;.„);.,f.:,:',A,'14;-gk,,,,,.tii..N,,,,,s:?1.,?.k..::•.,;.;:;:.;,•,;!,!7....:,1!i!t,.,T.:,;T,.:..''.,•::••::.i.,!it:!:,:..•.V.:..1:,-,Z•-.•.,'.,,A.-:-:45,v!.;,.:::,':,e:-::•:::•..§•',‘'3:.-i';,l.,:'.;'i.:'V-AN.i,:' }••'•:....,'"',7,,,:E.i,i•i.•i.',:i',:t'.,::,,':.J.',....;:,i.....,,„,,:•.q,...g.i.p.,...,:•.A.'%i-c'f..F;'?..'..:!.'::.',,-...,'-;t.i'P':::-Erf.,!.!P,i'',.'',li.•1":.;::r:!::•7:...;A."0:3'-.•.;,:;1::'':;,,'.::.....1:.4::i;i'',.'.'''if1'....',,;':.;,'',,7',i:•.••:.:i:,1.:',•'s.,•..•.•.•','.•t;•V.•:,1;•'.I'.,•:?c:-.';".-;1,;c'.:,'-,;...4q..-,•;;..::.-',.,:...,•;....i:"i:•:;i•.•4•.•:;',•,-•':F•-;.;:;,;,;:''•...-••'--.::::'•''.'.."''?'•'.•::A•..'..P!.-::.'-"1.'-::-@''-..''.'.,:-'':'''':.."':'';"',•.•:'•'''..-.!::•:'P•:i:;'-••:•••--'••1•';i'.:';:'••,•'•7'••:.;...,.0."J...i..P-;.",...:A < ,i':'.s.:','g;:.;;:t'F:::!e......:k.:..'i;;:'.•!',!..,.-'-:F:i'...'.i n's"'.,'-,'i-:)';i•!"(•4.1:-;.,q:j'...:..:.:,-J OPUS. . . ...•, ••• ••- - - • k.. -,.:;-•-•.: -••• ,,,...,...::.-,.. .. SOUthPOinte •-.0...41-11. .."-P••• ••4'.'"'''';'.: :•'•'•i!''';',.g.• ..:-::::::,•1.::?-2:;.1;i1..',1-'•;:•';'••;',...;••,:•:+1;;IF-;;:::,.• ••:.,::';•':-;:.-;•:;p:;:,..:.;,.,.;„‘IEA...:•:,,:i•<:ii::.•,,,,,,•:;::::,..;J:ii.i,....,::-,,o.v.,,,,,,.•-..-,i,i.-:„.•,.;.,,,'„!T•t...,..-,...,:.•:. .c::::;:•,.:,.....,-...,,,,-:',...::::'!!•-•; -. . ••• .•••••...!•••••'••• • :,:;.::::..•!;.-.:2•1:•••••:q."-?;-i'•'•'',•••.•••':...":-... ,'5.'', 'ji,..:!..:.. ,',: . „,.: .;.. ,.ii'f',..':., ,;,...kcjf...i',i.;: ' . .40.. . '...--: .... • -.:::...:::.?.E!.•.'.':',2, ,,.:0. ':.!. ' .."..i.,,',.::.:; ::,-,: Corporate Center 44:2,•..0.',.•it.6•;;; ••••:::,:•-•;',•!:EU...'..'i :'--.:'•:`g,•••,,':'.:••' :ii.'T.,:••:•;•-;;''-'•'::"'•;rili'-••;:•'•;.J.'h/i.i•J'',i•,;',:,•-•;•.::• ..--i•... -;.;:,:;,..•••''.j-••.::••ff.;'.&:•; ::.[:-:•''''''',1:'...;i•-''''•••••2•';':•:-..•••, ..•••••: -•...,.:::. -L :.:'. • ,•••;••:;•,•i.. , a'ic;•:,:••••. ..,:•. ••••';'.;.?,..•;•:.:„.•;4.;.;...i..„,••,.:;.,•;.,!!;;•!;.i•Th:P,.::-•,•;,.:,,,,,-..•••,,,..;:i..,...;•:.;•,;•;,.,..,-...;...•;1....•iT,,,•,.,;-:D..:.:•;:s.,,,.!:.:'-?,-•-.... .*...'."•","''''''' •• - • • • ' •••••,::;,.•:•.:.;; ;...... ..';.:,••:......:.••• . . -!:•,I--:'''':''''' '"-.'",;.•••!.••••`..:"..:,!!••:'•:::.:::•%:'.;":''' -.:!:::•'-:;;•••....`51.;;C• :`-j>.••••••••-;;'i..i.•••••. "F•••'.;-;',.;:•:•!....."..-..;•....:L2'.!:: ,,:--,L.: I . •. '. .It..... . ,.;;;:.... ...:. ,, •'.:- •':-::• •1'.• - . ....:,' .. - , .•• ' . Renton,WA . ". ' '.. . • , September 6,2000 .. ,• • • . •. :•. ... •:',.:-...''....:.:.:::1.:;!•1::'•': :::.:.: -.' ,...:••.:',;:.:.'..... ..,-.,'i7-:;.?),F.,::::•:,,,--,•,..:::••.:,,::','-'.'1:.,:ii:::::',•-•,,,•-•min r'; aj::":1111:11., .:::: • ,,k,. ....-.. . - • . .-.. . - - .-. . . . . . • . • : 1-. . TT • . -,LE,1••1. L.LL -•,• • - -• • ,• • , •-•.:- •• :•• ••• .• - - •• • • ..,:„ii,,. . ,,,r.iiviriti.„inif,, .. .. , . . . . . . .. .. . ... „• • .. . • • . • • • • . • • .-inip-,,,-.-. ..N7i-ilt at.....g. . • : . . • •••, .-- - • - - . ,-,.- ••• - •• . • • ..--:--•-•-::•: • • • - • - • -- • • . • • - • F.FE.=36'-0" ii.=.F..!..."!..w.kaiihrerge.ft404A11.. !'-'7:,..,,,•• •.r.m.,-,,,,,::1:: :7.1,::.1•:::::: i$:...,iTN:i:::,iiii:q4Ni'i:-.il:A5.1.:r:::•:'..4:04:'.••:.a::%,::::,..,.:-:'•.i.i:,;ICO:ii`-ri:•srm.:::4;0•11.!::: ;:1•;L: m.i:ii.k...:-.A • ,. : • • , . :,,, . r,.,. ...,,.,„. •. _,...,..,,-.-... ............,-,,,,,,,,a,,.:,v ,:iv.v:i:el!...ti.i,xa:AVini:::-:,?:,,r4,..,wi,i,...:tt,i4i,Y4,-;z40;.,,,,4.ii:joni:nKmiiim•••:.:Iu::f.fi,i4.,:im.ii.iitiAkvitx.:g.1.0.:.:-.;+xiiviiiiia:INt.41.A.4:E::::.3mvisip?,.ii..v.v::414;;....i,E.-ii:? ,,:',,,n.,':;11,1'.'.'.',Ak,*,Uj,wwil',.,:i.',?••'..iY-'7:1:,,*1.',:..":,'''''.:ii'i,...,.?.'iir..4:1:1:,0:7:::q::::.:PC,::•4.::.%ii:f:E:.::.:,.-: ',:',:.4.:1'40-..,:?:'::'....f4V.4:::::::::.:Ai.iv.:.*::4:::15a",..'fai::.::::!:ri-S:t.ZiNegrt:,1:::;.;qi:.:1:3:::::•Ei.ii?1,11.if.k:::AE::;:?.::.:lni:11:.:::MiNki.::::4K.4::::tei'i::::':ia,,Atzmpe#:i.-*U5.,;::: .ijp::.5xrigu;:;j,.:;..W.:,:i,:;:5,,,c.,z.i,;?.::,,,:?,:fm:.::,...,,..:vv5c..i:,5:,,,,,::.,..,s, .g.iZglik.A:ilc.I.N.':;.14.:'gji.t::Rk.ligi:iti:z,atiip....,:'..:%:.:ifi"..:gr5:Rit:4dsil:.X.;!,1:!.?.i:it:gii..4:§::.i•:',:itt:N.k.,iIgggitigtkigpg.IiiiWri:ialf.gt.i.ifgit:Vg.kig.tirigri•,.ito;:.iTVAXo5:,3:*l:;llpoV„4::.Vtttlg:ft55'im.:NkilAi,v4o.ltktlytr.*Igaqit,:,,m,..,.?pigt..ss.-agpj6iiJai.l.s.4g4N; . P:1;:ialtiganaitltrafigaaglaYtitei?1.5.441ii:VONZW.,,:;:AVT2Mt.P4:tiMilfittrik4ASA‘fire:W.:,2%:•,,,5;1,..E:'!:ty,k1N61.4rf:**4•00:af,!,7,...,ti:,..1 ,'',"Tli:V:7e;:::f„:k*,0_, r,; ,,:,f..f.A.10.1,,WkW. ;:,45:'' '':1:1::%117.-.-n-IU.::"'''''''''.'.':%',24,::0*1.01:4",e,`;'.::.%-t,:.:•-•."-.''..li'Or,y:•,-P.:'?::::',:-M.:-::"•:'-..:,.::;,...4` .4,4.1.;.-:.:5,..-..,,:x;...:9;frlic;:.14'.•:;::::'9:::::•:-.1.'4',4%..: '...:,,,,,,....t0;,...PP:43:.-g4'..."5.,...,-*;*.i '...si.ii :-!,:',r.,,:,.;?:...:,...6i,43-„.,-4.----:•.-..-,.a-...'•••,,,,,P,','`..:-,,-..K.s.is;.:(0:••••• •-;:. •,;• ',...:,',7,,,,,v-;-:•. ..,reglrg.:,;--.Es,,r. :.:-10-itwz.,•,5;-1•4.1*;m..---.-.,-;;;•,,,',..,.gfgA,4,k ,'..'.,..••„'kAiff:',.;',.:..:li:".•V.A.'.4:';.:`:,-;c:'.'..1A:Pl.g:.......:...:1.?4,i:',.(. 1 .k...:::::...,:::::Fg'r:l.'P.i.i.?%,:eM:--- ..':.: n'..,:::i:':''1:.::';;:.'i.....':..:':.{:-..'.1:',i:.::'::fi':;,,::.:;;L.';'"7-:r:1:%"''''.C.'-'::' ...;,,A.„..,;„.3*,io.....:.Oot...104T;..,...,',1‘..4:..e.':',..,.7.:..,:%;.,;:,:_.,.K..,..W.,-.);';i:.'1,p,,,!,::::,..f....ii.. .iE,::::.:.EE!,;04;:.AA,:::-E :'...!:',1rik..::e.'?",,I...•....W.:,,,,,,Af:',,,,,`,.ii:::,;33::::.,:fi:::;,....',Ki?;t:L.,..::•!..:],:::i:.:,:,i7,64::i':;:,:i,.ii :,'iE'..:':,'!Nk.','...:11,';'a,":;;."T. `....::.:;i1:,-;:::'...1:.:::,,A...:,.:.'i:.:.:-:::::••1::.'.,:•,:',....":.:::-.1.:::::::.c: : .'"'1.M;..et; :.;',.4540.4:?:':',.::.:,:f.,;:g4F.C4:;,':VOACW:,..:.-7,1g. z....:ck i:::,:,..:..,ii: :...'::!!'.'..(A'......iti.i?...j.:'!:..1.''''''..1.D:A''''.*;::::.'`....:-.9 .'"'-';''''..::':........i.:„",i'.:..--fi:P!++;;;;i:':':!4.!,?..;;:!J.:: :.':.''1.i::::1',...,:,1,..:...i•• P r.;.F,•'::.`'.:'....'::: %2'%''..":.....,'+'......::.'.....!:'...1"•''''..W' t .•:A:'''''''.1!':4j;)1if*" °:9F:'''"'•1. g'i.i'' '"...F4.i..liirC?: .:'.:::::1;:;•?':.. ..".':: ::;•''. ..'''''''''':'•?4.;ii'::::'';'1.:';:::'F.P..:::.''''ill':'''.:1 '.!...,-F....'5I:'''....':'-'''',••• ..:::•-•:.'-'+'...''..rj...'I.'...."::::!.. ''''?..:.'.....::;'.':: ElevationtP1:146ithaSt/S4(ithTi....,,W.)..C.'E.,..'E: ':.1'':!1! ..'...,:i'.1::::.'::.-':''',.:::,!1!!"...i::::'.. .•::''•::...,i'''. ,'.:.'.•-.:::-.•.-:'•::"':::::.;''.::.'... .`. .::;i.i:•,....• ,.:. ''.: ... :.'•::.- .::...: • .... .,• .:,'. '•..., . ... .. yita .:.: .., ..,...,.;....„..,....... . . . . . QE • . : ., .. .. , . .. .. , • •• ••• -•.-:----,..----;,-;;1;;:;4:,-;•4;!;;,.....;,•:::,-%;--r;34.';•-•:;1;•::•:,;:';';;•;-:::.K.'.:•••'';,. .;:,e., ., : • . •.- .........„.„,,,,:,;:::.,,,,,,Gr.,,,,.,:..,:-.,::::•,-;:i,..i;:fe.:ii:iy.25::,,;.:-is•-•4-.-Aiii..,;•-•,,•]F,..4ri;:•:,,,,...., ;•.:,.••••-....,,,,-.::;-..-.;,;•:.:.:-...'•.;;.;•-...:.;;:;•:::•:-•;:;'!•;;:',.:;;;.-.:-;;1;fw.;,";',;•,-;,;.-::-:•:,,,•,"-,•-;;;;;;..;;;;;•,,,;.J,;4,..4:•:, .....,... .:..,..,,,,...„,..:...:::......::.„,,,..w.„•: :;";-.-i;„.;.., ,,;',,r.i:E.Iiirr:,,I;;;;7'riii,...;-; t*.i.,:;••:-;-;;;;;;;-;,N":.•,*-•:;;:,• -;.:;,;,;;;;;-::;1,;;;.;•;;c:-11;•;,r.....,•••••,-.;::1,•:..;..-;,:,-;i..:::•':...:T'' ..:'..k<;:.'.'::--,,'::.-.••'• •i•ii:r..;•:'....:,..:L.',...''''..*:...•'!': ,.,,,:.::::,:::•,;'.?,.'.•-'s:',...,.q.'' ..:;........,:::.',..(:.,..-..„'.:•'. ':..12.',:..-.:E.OP':::.'a,E:;'•"•: 'il:ri':"Zi.i:-.;.;:,..-.",:i:.:4-:'Ef:E:.:".::::c.-f::%..,..,..rii-,::,,..•,,,,?.::!..r.:,:,,....,i i:i,..,...J.i..c:,.....?;.:i.*-ai:.:'..•:;:''''. -•,Ti•,- ..,:i.:,.;,:::.•:::,: :.-.;.:.,:.1:.M,,..,;.,:::.::i.'T:...r:;''''.-:ii:::::,'!":...• ''''.'-''•' ' .."'..:::: 9:•....-"r. : .':..:'.•:•.::" 1...:..::`••'''',!'rA:'; .' •...:..'"..--.'':...:.J,E.,:.'.''":•,: -.;,:'„,..E.,..', :•.,-.:',.,-::.-J;•7::..:,'..:,•'..::::.;i.,.:,;:,:",..:„..,..-4.:-:-.. ..,',::P'''.',r:..:'....':',-.,,-1.1"; :..' -:"•i4c.':'"?. ..:..,',...'::i,.qz.,-:;:"'....:Tr. .:;-.:4';].•,i.:::'.•:.'''''',:Ali.'.'.!.:1:•.,.;4;.,..:'3.."::::,''k.': 4,.:.'1,:',..f:',:.::::-.; ;4,j:'•'• •:.. ,'-. '. • •. •.-.•!"••:'.....•.'•",.•,?,'::T.,...,%,.:',iii;',..'::......!'''!.":?•.'?!...:•r: :ff..',,V,:•1:''r 01,',•<•iMt4.;;A :4:7:::),.V:',•,,,,::§:i.:!',:2..:4',.. .•:-.-1Q,:-.-',1 ..c-:.:":''i.1::;-':'..,... ..:.;;;L:.''.•...•!?'...;,;-:•,,,,..,::..........•,-..::i-: . .V.,':ii!..'.;•,t*,.".::.E.....:*.i,r,'.'... '. : .'''''''•••::'4..' '..'"::'''';•''..:::'''':..!.'..').'-,,:'''','::. . . . ... ......?.:.-' .:•::::J.:,.''...r:...:..'::::i':,:,:i.".:1:'..•.......:.E."'..':•'.:: 'f.......;:' . .. . ... !•,..-4';,..;,s..-4..,.•. •,r•:.::?..'.ii-,,•,'.;-,-,t.:,,,;;x.,;.'2.1;:'...;.,...:To..•,n.. :11:•:;;:•...,•••• :. .'".:-.:z.,:-.E.I:J .-.Ecitiipment!Apten ,:-....::-.,'..,.;W -----, :,'A,:.7;*411•::.",';q"':..:-:,:!..,i-i;:•:-.,-;::;1-7..,-':,.:',;*.''FnThtiledCe..tnira4.-fPan:.iel::'-:.c::....•;'.:.;....'..::.:%..:::,,.,,;:::..;. ':..'':•A...,'i,;i::,:,:,:.,.,'.:::;,,,::.,..7.. , .11,,:.;::.:i;1..•.C!.:-:::::•:(1,:::,-LL:...!".'''... ••..-. :d•eaT•l:iAn.t•ne:da inlsed.•l aAlu,.d.mn-j;uamzi nFgr aInm in. g _ ,,.:':.i.;#1$,,,Mi:;'..;;;,,,.•,!........;;',.':';'. 'f-:::-.*7.---...: ..II:Lir;TT I. ril'9i ;-•;•;••.. •-'1:::•••-',.':.': ;;-1 ••';:ir'::1 1:!'•:'r;'..: ••••T .;'' ' ' ' .? 1 1-1I ,....„,..;;;.v:....:::.;;.:.....;.;;;:-• 1.,•• - ;• -•--. . :• . . 1 •• .7-----: --- - 2, • . i r , ,,..,..laginut:- ..t. • , • • . . . . UlIT . i . • ..I. 11:71* 111, Mari:11110 .... .... .1 ::,:. . .,...i.••••.:: :•:::.: •---.---,,•-,...::: •. . . . -a.:. ...,- . -111...1 in 1...--ERI..- . -!:: .-YNSMORMINIIIIISINIII*, , •-:''' '..':'''.".:: ±.1.••gratallE F:.• Ill' i Mil • n'.. L. - . --......:-.A...`.'...4).. ---7`'. " ,rr•'' . • iii , ii - I i#ffligliessig - :• • . lifsaWirla - ' ''IEEETIIII: ligitincr 11111111111. ;mils(_1111t1161 .JLEILE -+- j1= i Illsilik./ .- • i. • - ..• ': - • 21111141111: /ill Mal i IR 11111,.:... ... ....... ,,... ............ -" -----:=,,.....,„,,,,,.., ......-„...„, a iii....r..4.:--iiiivir:- ::,,,,,..r.....; .r.‘. : .. ' • • - . . - . ilt FAMW....VIRRilftliaWn.. .— r4., z 1741 wil ri. - -. '' '• ... 1111111111741111:11)82- - ---1111-1114.-------r"""011egi ARIPL ..",!!".141.777.7rPIT:tetIMITM !1!1gPF7'.gVIVIVAAAtMNI4;4tnaRaalf. • : 7.....''''''— . C. -..i--Ifil,,,,,E1111,7,,, ,,7„,61"railisAMILV:..iiiiiiiiir-iiiii-lii-Etti .4 Li'r..,•, rilliLttgl..f...N1F • '-'-- FEE."::36-04 'Igr-.24!#!!!...",,!.!:., ,,W, :,..:...::::;.,15:711.11rAiMr.:71=!.17,MA•9•!;•::::47'4140.1.0i.1:;111.!:,41:11;qiiii:jillgitliaii:VIM:::.!':,!:4145!:Iiilirit§:iitigipli:14.544:1•Akok.azitp,..:4:41,epx,fiztriki:::x:DoiffitTdigitibi,:pkwg ...;:":'',":4r;;.•'::::'''''tV•WV4:1•:'.:'"Ili•'• iEl*Ft::qiaq::V•iikaki.:::Ai4i•!;:lkijaiiilg..ViitS..f...killt$04.4ii•Gligtitig4aggrgat*MeRfKiiiig:05giti•-!:.itr.3(111%.9.'$:iiliiRaig•AP4;:iikAR*MOVar:,":14Pii-46*,!.t.t0kARIPRAtii0Vir.'? :::.',-,.'.::',•::,•iiiT:4.11:ig;;I:Ris'ai.Mlia931igt:',11•4045;41!:StiNPF*..f4Eaiiiilitit,,i,qe.i),?$'11)-rinOriti.WarpriageOgtilr,lit***Ifirftlfro-EilltitvAly:.:":, ,,,4.;*,a,:,::,,o.,...,z,;,,,41.404,04,,,,..,4,:i...;,•ka,,,p,,;> .;.,4? t';',Iglig4iftatigrOint*lairggiRi_i::,ROV:Y10,:tillt''9titiitOrti.,;1.14. ',•fgtPrairditi:‘i't:ff$13A•704:;'•e:`:,:i:Z.4.!!r5714:-.:p.,.1.-.::''!„.".'..,,d.:fF i'zi.niajf.. ,-,•••::.„.:;,',`„,g,lei.,1.?,C ;-.-3.1.:•;!::.„40111;--0,5:41,;•:1,AW.F4X03.1., ":.-.0',1ifig.v.-Jiw:, ,::,•:'," a'"'•-.5.-,g.,:..'--MP.:,:i::*.j,.3.....,;:r.;'' '.•....L.:7—.4,if5:,:."'....::YP'..%...-4,i'il.p..„,,..rt,•,.,•:+4,,ip,.,.r-01....i3.. ..,,,..!4,,, ,,,rg,..t::::,,,F.,...pir.,mi-.„..k...-;:iy,.:,1•05,,<,:v.,„..w.::,,,,. .,,,,.,1_,,..,, ,! 1,iv: .,...Pvii..c:::,::::WF:,..,.1.---:r.":':s:::•.if:::;-..;;:-".,Ii',•.,- ii,'' ,1..,..:1,",;7),.;:.::!'•OgfACii,:a.......:,-.EP-::::'.E.5%,-.:', ,..7.1?,:.,j)44-P. ..'bD•!.t.F11W0.4‘,.e.i.i9PgFif. .. . ii-.:•.1. -... .1.r.a..,-.-1;,•--,, ,-1.?4 ,-.,,,,-:th..i.4i:::::. ,..iip" - -:,'..;.;:t.4,;:: :.,i,-.:.:,-4:::.,,;,:-.V..i.:,:::::,;4:::':.•,!;:::!. .-,..,..,.".•,-,,;:mr,...,,,ziggr..73.:.., ,:...,..0,...Nq,,,,,4,..,,..: ;.,,;•.!I.e.15..,..14;,.r::::::?.;;13.5,:•?..k..c.;:...,,,,,,u.T:,&•••: ,..:,,,,,...ill:•:;?-t..:.;01:..:-.4:-,,..,..?Ii.:•... .g4::,,,0••••••.••k•:'::",•;:g-..-1,:e:: ......; .'' .:.,...,;-....,., . .'4..':-•, ,....,:i..1 ,,,:!:,,,i..,. .:,,...': :k.'-''.:'e...,;1.-,,:.' ....' .,,.*,0,,,-. , - . v..... :,....7.::.K,if ,,,,i..-„ ::::,.-,,,,....,>,...:.,.'-..!,,,.A....: ,- x.,..-4,.. E..!.:i,.::iiir.,..::111:-:..;.„-. '-r•F.,...iiir 'V....E..:•••":::2.:•••:••.'::' '';•.;:•-•',;•:••••-.1. ...-•.i: .-'''.E;•:':',..'''....''...‘...•-'''..'1.11':','":./: 44 '.'... . ''....t...."''''''''''''''''''''.. :....'''''''''''''''.:.....`. .:: .. ''''''''' '. . .......: :-....''. .:'....' .2... -::.. ....::: ... '''... . •-•-:..':.- •- '.:-..: ' : '.: ••••:-:- ": . . Typical NorthWest/Sotitheast Eloyation o 15 30 60 . . - . . . , OPUS. A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Exterior Elevations -- 0 25 50 100 l'I ..:Er PRELIMI .A RY SITE IMPROVEMENT PLOI-- _ - ..-->,,,----,,,,----,-..--- 1,.. ta, 1-1,..4-'1---,A IIlz.E.., ....5,,,,,...6....!7..:?"-:f_.'''''.,,,..-,-t'.!•,1/477.24i';-,:."... ...1:„. 2R'"4-:-.... s A --"7----'-4.,:r.ia 1-----"-----,••• „0-- 9,41,,,-- --:---.5----"----:;•"------....---`--:''-- ''r.-::'...:-••:-'-',c,,:....':-,•'-:--JI '-\\',:"..--7"..t.;;:---:••••"-:.:-•••,..-•Z`„--..------ .-:. ,--------,-----,"- •_,'.•:-••-'---,- 7.-_------:____--,----.1.7,-_-, ;,,,,,---cbTo.s.•s.,-:;i.-. •-- r:, ..--2—',..-=-z- -:-- 7:-_, ll.l u j oz -(-°° UNE EASEMENT „,... ..• ,,,,A, I:. ' sl N .NO 981217195L).-, REC .,' Ra---- /---441, ,.....,,-,11,1•''' 2, ----_,Aft,-,4.1----atle.;yr'''''VL'W•=--..'•••--.--•"--;'rrti":_\ •••-,...'-'' ..1.--•-----•.•;:-- ..'- =f- ":::-----.--.-/7_-: :-_,:-:.-.3,-. ;-'.---.:..' .,-- .".. -.. i----,----. ...._7-7".:•,-- 0_ ,..,..‘,. 1-, z \ 14. C)s , .-„... .,,,..— ---....,,s.-'.. -.....„__ - -1\A I'll* _7=,.'--------:-..---- ''' ---...„_\:-___.- ...„.isc=k7,71"-,.;;AST .•''7.7,-,..-4,..:-..j-- L., ....vd_-,f ____,...._,,-E".„ ,..---. SP 1-1' .. stra......,-"'"..........,,=<.,----.:.:----'... - •.' , .--lirPc: '... . ' ."'' '' 0)0 Z o 47-- '''. -•-''...'"'" ' - 'it•'.::t4•-•Z?.!...- ,1- t,8 I...Aril';#11-Nifig ,,,—;7---..-.:1,__-_64---cT,i; -,'-'-."'''"allek •-:'-'-'-•- ' • . ---- . )- 0 1 8 u> ••'----____„-i--"M gl NNI"‘-= '•-""--- . - - \ \ s.;•-- ------,--.. '•-,-.-- .-..,„:s"s'Alt 5, „ , I 5 8 z 0 ( . -------,....• t \Ill°,r..:047\-,fr,----..:m i '‘:1(t0,11.71 .----t-7.......................---•---- --:'. .— ' ;i -± ..• • m 0 cc US CL. • : \------Ii. ' ., K AA.,.1e. M M I g — -6 . t‘ • lk-_,,(41:„..... .N._..., •-.------"t±.7,,..4.,-.-..,---. ...tA :.,,, „, , : .-. ,, b .• ..•.... .. .._......, .---,_.... L,, . - w E g (.--,5 -7/-,,.;-?-'----.-'`,4::',-''''';'--C:-:.-73-:',==,--:.:144---1.-..-----‘z#T1:3,,,Yi.4.--1.1\d-Vi>,c.i//,•••'. , : . ,, 1- _,„•:,, :_,•,;;'...,- `-.:',. .,--._,•,-;:= • .zz.:•-_ __ •. _--Yic jp, „... •, .. ,: SEE Z 1 . Lc'ej .C,c 7,1;set., ,.,., , ,•-:z.F:,,,' ••••.., ---... ,--_-_,' , -- .. . .. ." ,•-;7.-:‘,;... .... ... ..„ ‘tITS--i /•- „ .----_•• • ? 11:: ....... 4,i' .4 ita KILI 08t2r1 1 51/1 eilrtgit Lk 4; _.II. Z 'Z' '/leo --" ..... ......................... 14 -•. 4.4.ig ELI IL ,sk"'"44 S)•• IN.G ST ' .1 '' ' VA..: ,'''(.^4.‘‘'• • • ,f.) 1 I' • i i II/ ,,,,s,,E..--• I'. 400,""4- . _--„:„•,,,, ,„„ , -------•,•,.........,.. • ............. '-.1' \ I',..p •". 47_4_t , , . GU1TER 2 '- S.'...° <.. 4 -2 , air • . , • , . ., ..,Z .4 • .''',, •,1 ''illill ' ' • ' ' s . : ()0 tg . . E-. ... ....• 0 0 4.4, .... ••'. 4"-V2:0 II"''',,,..,,,,f.:,,,, :,..,,,:: ;i:,, • \•-• v , ,,,i -I C9 0 , 1 • .40,* i_.ao .0 .4 our=e WA R 1 UNE EASCRENT • l 'Z''..1g CO iii °' 4 REG WO 7405290484 I;g ( i • . / ) '''' . '.'"L W• CD < =E . r• 2.1E a .........-............ .'• ..a w 7 • _.. • \, - , COSTING ' cc m 0 F > • as.411 ..-,,s\• z w ;'•....I. ..''' i//,' / , _,,___ , ,,,,\\..1,;/:/ ' ,, ' 247." r:Mr CO _1 CO _I • Lc) w Il.. E ca -;''' '1,* '' ''• . ,.. ..rc.....................*........................................B,s._Pk4:,s.a.s0ai3ts WI 0 I" ''s" 'V .' . , '• - ' III kir ,1 I " ,,PRoDE,,PO.SED v• '• EIC OP:CANCRETE • DRAINAGE ClimNIEL .•' ..- . , ...'7://. 1;7:,S1K - : 1 '- ' • " --- .• . \ . ,40,,,••,1 Et.5'INAKETER .• .. ' • 1.°1'. . 4,- ••.' ,,, , .• - • .- , •'• - i'';'.1 &,... et •• • _, . o 2 :;'.40-• . . •1 , , . • , , -------\ , .ARF-A ...' I L.11111R ,,, -7 ! • u_ 1 -.- ,-'.','‘.'• .1-'\_'' ... 1 —) - I/ - 'iv '\ ''', ;:lttirj6"..1.-4,1k,,''' •'. . .:.:::. - •......? 1111 II ,.. _ '5= 1 i ILDING C .,,,_•'L____ .. . ) 1 I ` s','0 , -- . -11.11-11 o,..... • .....,'*;‘, . PST.POWER =I- ---\--- . r ,-• • , z. . , ., • O ,T, s ._._...IA- ••••,...................,,,,,,,EASELLENT0 S Si '.'1. ••• ,,r7' . BU ft „, •,.,;,,,....,:.• :,..;;,,o. IP . • .„. • i i i 1 ----:.' - - .. aalfte*e... 6.000 GSF •• '"..11gtil Pfg:3 . • .' • . .•. •,..-,' AI v. - ric - " .....) •• •• g, T T g Emir 1 r. c3s" •\‘3 -gTie,7"., T,1 4 % . ------------- s_____::-------- -----------4444., w ------_---7----.-----______:—'-------- - _ --,=---____ -41.1'.-',_''.77,'!"-.4.1/7"Illo 4. v.,. '.9(4,,.)Acr) r. ,,..A.Nr• • r, ACCESS 4)" r "IF-- • • AI.,..,,,_.•,-,.oc7j ,, .` . • 7'cl's\' 0•.'•.' 2'2".''::'',rq 5c i ........„ . - ,,s.osiats ---::•-_____:: -71''i.;ici'-,, .-------;-";14':-:',,-4.111ftilIS‘,„ rg • _l_AP•sa , ,, • ../::--''`;-'-•'•-:' ,, 1,..., I .' , -----,--.•,,e,"--7.-----------• ---- --_:"--:--------- 1•••••:-. ---• -,----•,,,,r-^"=""- N.... - -- ing0, • ='Z4r.-- --",1" .....••.A':.•-'--..:---"---:••-- .---'"._ S-'' '''.7.1UTTE)4_.„ "...: • ...-•`: "'• - .‘4A,-"""-s••-"----"7•7 '' / ,/ ICODING K .B., LEGEND •........ AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT I• ..1 ,!•:-..1,..'.."', :,..,;,';'.SITE •>,„Z-DK Krowr, - • .. SITE MD: 1,8 AC - . . PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER --...., 8 PROPOSED BUILDNGS/STRUSTURES: ---_, r'rrGRAL SO• * COSTING CURB AND GUTTER _.. BUILDING A 145.200 SF , WILDING 11:188:'''.-.,. -IP FRONTAGE..„,. ' . . •-r, "...MOS PROPOSED Loomagur Ey 0 Op's PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ems BUIUDING 8 145,200 SF BUILDING C: 6,000 SF -.. I EAWRES 01-0,01 j SLOPES EGUX TO OR ttr TOTAL 296.400 SF GREATER THAN 40S t.',.--, BUILDING SETBACKS REOUIRED ViE•TEAKO AR.: SEE NAN CITY OF RENTON 1 F, .o OF 40S SLOPE.31.603 SF 0 CC NOM& AK AJSLE AR . • -.984.)8' „„.• INTERIOR)(UBC ONLY) 10'FROM GRADY WAY 10.FROM TALBOT ROAD 10.FROM BENSON ROAD .., , PARKING ANUS& RE0ARED, ..114 TAKALsTST,,,sLS BUILDING SMACKS PROPOSED: 254.FROM BENSON R/W(E PL)TO BUILDING A ...., - OPPRFITNISNT OR PUBLIC WORKS •1.) DRIVE S E Y ..2 11.1.1,1 D . .•. '11. / ... .... .0. 4,6„:13:570%/4'0'''''FIATF('rD'AIR'/WRNIITOCIU'ILrIN'C'Ell' ILIPERNOUS SURFACE ARK PROPOSED: 468,000 SF • • 4 LWOW° STALL 928 9'•11r. (STANDARD A 4 LOADING) sr.SIED 81.x 16(CUP.) UNDSCAPE AREA . V `.--- S OF LOT COVERAGE(BUILDING AREA) Ils !-.---. ,...,.., .5\V 018..1 .{ MOE .V. n_e. slam, 1 0, L _ REQUIRED 58-34.800 SD R. / ,,,,,p ARFIVREO •'"•^''.'...• T 6 ''''''' . _ . , ... file P\slOproATT25\piel.rn,noly\T725-po dwq Do1e/T,05e.09/11/2050 08 31 Scale 1.50 pair.Dela 27225P6.EMSPUTTISPS. •• x w .. rm w so ® ! ,.D CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , .... RENTON Planning/Bedding/Public Work..Dept. TREE CUTTING / LAND i NO. REVISION 6Y DATE APPR I• - - Gregg Zimmerman P.E,.AEminisirclor CLEARING PLAN 4 1• ti I �c 1 ym 2 J . , , '.i \ j '� -53• k sT ' 1? .;;;"-\. \l':\\A..-<•„. I F i! I i i i. I I \ \\:.N \\\,, 8 /I ' vi fio, i \ / I i I I:',. .- __/ ili a .i",< ' 7 ' / I /If I////\• /,7 . . ).:-:e \ . .. . . . �, \ � \ fr VY,r�w� \ . � yhif E.— : , 4,1 „:-, \ ,,, /'..::,\f.p I +/ f� fit,� \\ \- \\ .� ^ \\ I. 1\ (� 1. r /( tAff,,,L„—i() , i rrf .\ \,is``.:' \.- • 1 •jam✓ 2' -). \ I 'I\\\\\ wp i / .4". , _ . .,,,-:- ,‘-•-, - c / ' 1w*/ 4fi3 i#, \ k' ,-.-:.- , ... ; \\\\\,-„,,,\,,,,,,\ \,\\_z› , . # i 'pa � � . , �quill�)• / .�e . / . .,`; % /- 1/ :0.:, �' � ' �` '' /jam/ � l lii iil»)b . . / , /; it 7 •—...........„ ,11011W •-'.'",,:lWikliltgclfr ,,,,„ z, .,' ii i \\\\\\\\ / \tik\ VA, •—_— \� %mil,'e�1� � py.tq+u+ \I 1' \ c. lk‘ - -,,,:.Hil \ n� D - II + .Y. \� �`\\ 1 . \ /l' / 1 I\� / III .'-5—\\ •\ \ ,• „ //://, ° F-174T 01 i g 4 0 7' l'-.,k_,_,I,,,e -''''' \\ s \''''°:\'4,- \ \\7.1 .11•% i. , , /ill m GHAV FOR TIME: D z PQ S% 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 OPUS NORTHWEST,LLC a 5 p 'E�s_ Z (a25zs1-sz2z 915118TH AVE SE,8300 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE (425)251-8782 FAT s ,, , S.W.GRADY WAY �/ 44 CMt ENGINEERNG,UND PANNING. BELLEVUE,WA 98005 RENTON,WASHINGTON A(A AG ENGINfE SUR+EI1NG,ENVIRONYENIAI SERWCES (425)453_4400 , o0 PRELIMINARY_ _GRADING/DRAINAGE, PLAN _ _ -- I • 5 E swc EDGE ( n •\ a. `^ ` /�li/'` '��--. w O OFPAVEYEM:." f ^ \y � B `� ��--ly F1�10"gE�p�N, /_�� IXIs1,stDPE rp i • ���'�•�-�"` w _\ Za,,UN LL'eED i`\ ,. �•/ '... • -• '.:••c. 111 •r ,-6l T.p�ISi tOPE TO' • _g ^- � --:---...----:__I----_. --j`-�- Z ¢ I �e! .,.. _ ... II ' 'I,r,/I � :FlA 7°, D."RBEp ji ____ _��� `—'�/ r9.� �\\ • '''!f � o zY� - • \}, a"s4: - ,: \ .-_ �y"f,-_/ �' <�� PROPSISED /'i z 3a 0 2 \ ! ti•tiuY.�'/ .1' ...`..�.��` �/1f: I I\ O 0 co �. _ sod • �' ]..: I d CO r '_' „_L_.. .a_" 7 PN-Je %J / - F C1 i r ".Z IX r�,I / I , - .•. ��...` w '" l\ / \ ...I, 7 ' ., •, r•_1'_r-:;j;.( r ` so - I k• 4• h,..' L e ..,� \ �.. D z Po fJ _ ---'- PW.Ja _ =r Pic — cc a \ •, ��( � A z w .. / �' ,I `� JY 7ri' 'f{r 'rr'!j I����,1�r�rr ,' 1 � '�j I r 1 n¢. e�tip- a T -I w ' - �� Y c. �,i I-I_• I I }"^ F`: r I sD.. /O \�,� STORM 1 • ``\ ::- ""• �' rP (TY AC , ,1(; N//FLOW RESTRIC R ~ • I T• I'L\':.. T=• p�E 5.200 GSF •I • I\.I t `may %% //,✓Sa„ --,,' F ( " '"• °l' V. I�j = M11' - Y1( ' ,:i0:yy7 (yy( / 2 cp MIN m � �' r ' y % : 1 ¢ W af, " ') -u'` ' {� . O• a s /? ,,, : "t I . 1 ; . ----,,.....,... 1.-..). 11111111111411 , ..., 1 „ ., \\ — I ..:' ':.Ris°1 Ip4Ea]3� O /, // f 2 ✓.. • TTE t GB •BUILDING B)y'S"A /; Y // q o ` ^ .HOOKS°Ja,JOD C$C / a S'DtAYE]ER \• - x. CLEW. .(/ Zt ':� i BUILDING - _;a % `;:,... o°oz' 'r � "��44/1/ • / / i 'R`' \ !/ n - -_ � _- -►- eF.-ns w z r 1 0 I ,,i',.\ -.pmv '' '',A r r i'i i i' I,I I -oo _ ,° l� l:�- � • • �/% /1 ITC aft o __ •'Si _ ar IL I r r•',FT iti 1-t- i'- i I1 Ill I/� _' '-1 11 l l I i,er'i 4At \\.' ¢• gw .-��� - ;Ai„GF,Ae�.�� - lam! i�,�ll1�(f-}./.(� r.; J %�. uonurv�swui R Ii`•�•y ^3v• 5 bg • l % e =,,, : "'a PROPO• SED i s,`s ?,iiiii s r/�P`iJ' :_. ` o. q: ":.•,,,,,.; POINT OF r � /Ej MST.LEGEND DRAW uuolotE 4OSOVN , _ � >?e _ -�.._�-/ / , e t o Q q 'E `<3" DISCHARGE '' S,t v4`� `�r.//C EXIST.SrORN ORNN ---R--- _ `` "aLJV I.- `ms�¢ � X\/ . �F•''r t,.•C.O.W� Is. ,I,', fig• F COST CATCH BASIN .CB :. `` ` _Z \o<�'a '41 i i\`.'/ /'1 NIL Vb•�X•b GOyaJv E1U51,GROUND CONTOUR " �\ -`�\\�\`' 3 X 5 ExPIafS os-o]-Ot r Ensr.GROUND SPOT ExEVAnou , ' CITY OF RENTON PROPOSED STORY DRAIN SD EARTHWORK i •'�. , : DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS '•'•�', ,. PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR - 3}.O I • L W VOLLUES) • PROPOSED ENSILED GRADE SPOT ECEVAGON PROPOSED SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION F41 VOLUME CUT Y IU.WD CY • /v �\ - PROPOSED RETAINING WALL •-� PROPOSED TYPE,CATCH BAL. --P— NOTE EXCAVATED YAtEAY1 OEEYFD USABLE WILL I\ °FAO ��� yre ]/xa/Da gpro BE UfRIIEO FOR SIZE ELLS. FEYAWING WIFRYL PROPOSED TPE x STORY MN NH —� BE WIRED LO AN/1PROVEO Era-- --/ u, scue I -50 rangy_R...- .e P\sE9 Prul\]]:.\P+ebmna•r\]):SP9m a.9 Dale/rime 09/09/'000 0510 Scale I.50 cnuc.x.Hs 2]]_SPB.E]]ISP5.2>]ESP,,E]]+SW. / Na m__. B1' 'ED a..•ae...�... .m<tr_2 OF 4 • ' �g, ��'� PRELIMINARY g �� UTILITYPLAN P�. EMSRxD 59•PJWER _ - ' •`,`. l "12 -C Pk LINE EASEAENT (]S' RFD.NO 9813t]195L�' -0'-� _--T� r \\ ___ ,, a,:-'- ,,; p d -�' "- - SE.UN p v'' �ii'"ciswsOExrPOWfA, ... • `I\ - Z Ly -- •� •4 '�,; �EC.NO 9&131JI951'\ • �—— _ — _-",....:_- ¢ �t • i w / , ,,� J�.J (�! -j! ( ..f�� II �,f i '' „r�i ri,5 I( (I�' -•�;: -``^..• ¢ LTD ( ( (' cl ri j ( a \\ r I I ! f 1. �..f r, �-;.'- .�- �$:, r •• i• �(I�-• r r ,te j i� I�1 I '7 � ^rig ;. I' �+�--�!I^(•01 F,r• � r r f; .! .( _ I _ ,v, nEc xr sEur']I 7„',„, r I( `i�-.,-�� (' ,•••, ' E %�.L. /`; �0 �10N'_'l.i_1 1 .PROPosco e` ' i _ �'�.`,i t3tJ195t r � 1 (l(( 'I rI �I 1n �;f �'I r RE MDRurt I• ! I— :+ 1 ( 1 ',(�-(',I, i'�_�1/J I'j ;/ •. •2~ J'I"��1.!.1 I ( r � I,i l 9 IIJ1951 /\J'� Q t. 'T--r¢ztar J (.LO; I 1! 'f !i. ✓,o E. wEµI, ���/At ���L ! J r -�_�_1T1• rP 1;,r 1 e, ' RECN059OJyJ/- �/' y Y _ f 11?'(I`� I�7�-2C �'�yW--_.�'[-.,I`_'-L-i_' Jl�' �-...J_�Iv�f,. _ _r}7-, ! •I } .a? f �. OO ;Nc 1 , r 1-1 ' if- Tcf(J- e // /;, � � b �/ • 'i BUILDING A ! ;'v:•a"' PROPOSED 1 A ��.'7" ;a ?�'Y (r 1 s aoo saoD cs'Fo°csF l 1 1r . -- ';SAN•SEWER _ ,,,. i 7' ` s �a �'l 11r ( � 'I �59D !'-. -. n7- ANr{o�E j ''' O N o _ m E ✓ C! 11 ': i - • • • '• �'( CONNEt;T10N� s 91 `. L-i_C"(I J -/I r I_r r ',:ice----_ ?d" r;t t', //`/ E �s uEa o c k\ r \ 1 1 J 1 -� - I 1 1 ! I 1 P ..d to���i / ,ItEc:t+oa z9c.e. co W m u I �' r��y� f _. ':,_: ,N i t ROPOS D W En Q r r ' _ p q:-;<:: ,' I 's SAN Sa ER. 3 r L NE r: `a 7� .$�,,! I: i(? rPfiDA0SE0--„,`•:,l � @.\\ .I.:ul .4 dm 9 if' • _ • �(fl r! N.I SEW �'� - - _ ,<! _,_.� Z F W N 01 ` f fl 1--- •�.1 ' l r (�{ MANHOLE_,r">> - �- f(t. • ' ., /j��/./ co J �� o��' i'' ' nRc iao'awt l �'(..r,J (i( - } i -o'':jr PROPOSED --� -- -.� ip.' _ _ /'•' D . w �. r-.,�1! I '� ( r SAN.SEWER .: ! no / 0 a9 co T¢ I�� y,C-, T)` 1( (i -7 'I ---i; SERVICE LINE �i :E wDRurt -.t i.. � /,: FaEI '// e 2�ep_ 1,�� I�(1 _f ..�•� > ,�� �i! S'�d� - .s. / • oe'.oia°eCONCRETE r+ 6 L�1_yl' r SAN.SEWER •I. f BUILDING B �9 5 PROPS F "Ek.ro = / •`/ i -`I % .-,. +..,�•„--�. (I.I _ - � �1( - -iOLEi .ROOR5200 G,000 CSf% SAN.MANHLE SEWER - - _ - • `!. SAssER >•,,•'-'. •\,e, _ _ yll PROPOSED i�p ''-.,' / CULVERT 1 I • 1 1] NE i Sss �/ s, �i \\'-'ta ij-( !� "`'>:%,,-_L. WATER LI /"_ !i ,;,:_ '..--.. I O E I,, I. :L� _ 4-� _ ,... � - CROP •F%- 7> -. - I; ;> ww. ../.7—rir?:1.,/ - —� z /!i1i I- r o •a • r _/; EBs.PAN • - POINT'OF n,-- ~' �'-B9t3n195� I .P.' C`Gj o C4NN CTION S� uans fly- -�'•`:....' . �S / x \ • 1i - (WATERJ- .. -ti �� -( '\,. +` I aAOP• \\'\/r I .` w p" -� � �.;\.` _ _ i.fusE I; SIR /, j I V- I `,v m , ,e ---,„ `\—�'a�-op=.` ` `/�_ _�` / %,f,; (-i- �. / sPyulS.x cR�se 5N e MAW t LEGEND ��� y` \' `�\�' /� / ' i! �� �P"E `=y = �' W Ei PROPOSED WATER ME ...40 / J •!r� V 4 d o -�— —_ - \ 7 I ExaIgES of a]o, I \'\ CITY OF RENTON PROPOSED SIN.SEWER LwE - ~ s y �- PROPOSED SAN SEWER W.WNOLE • OEPAR- ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' EXISTING SW.SEWFR LINE --_ ~\ 1p'�' \I �~ \ E%ISINC LN,SEWER YANIIO21 •0 � ! ` // FIRE OEPARNEN]CONNECTION /® aITS DDs M. • 0U.P\WOE,\])IS\Wsum.nph\]]ZS-W op Opte/xme•09/09/2000 17,08 Xcla:1.50<n.xl xrala I77251.11 Z]]I9PS,Z]]39PT,ZJ)ISW, .T. Iesox �- x:��.•� -3 ,,,,_A- . - . oll'a OPUS. Southpointe • Corporate Center • Renton,WA September 6,2000 . .. ....., ....... -.=1-'-1-^ 1 ' =Office Space LOBBY I I . 1 =Corridors/Lobby ii b ELEVATORS el: i I .+1.?" 30' <--- '1.----,Typ7 .1 "fs...,:.• .z..5'.4 ' I i 1 =Restrooms i I I i i i ;.4- -,-e-- I 1 I 1 '-'4 eti.,, =Stairs/Elevators -,,,,-st- . , ,47,+.7: STAIR ---- -------i—--— —--i---' -- ---"----"------I—----—-— -• - --.- --------i----'- -----1-- —-—---I— — — —-i— — ----- STAIR . Pi.:$ =Mech/Elec/Janitor "' I ,..',• '...•., , r" I uj I I ''.7 Z I SPACE I :: '-, ',1' ' '' I c•11 z I SPACE , *J,'• ''s 2 ELEC/MECH 1 C'' i I ELEC' .. _Z ,,,4,.,... 1—- 1-- -1— -1— -1— 1-- 1--- t— I WOMEN'S' MEN'S' •JANITOR' tIlii.• CORRIDOR .e.''Z': _ rII N3.?Ps' ! I a: i i I OFFICE I i I I I 7 I I I SPACE . I I I i' I I I I I I . --=r,''s-----:----111.-, I — I / NTS .... , . • 0 15 30 60 "A° OPUS. .4> A Development of Opus Northwest LLD Typical First Floor Plan • Pi OPUS. 10- SouthpoitAte Corporate Center :: .;::7:::'.....::::,.:':'...;"'::::':: ::*, „,','-:,.,, •:;' H':"... .::::''...;', :.:', .'„.:'.:::: .:. ".. I.:" :;: ..-,' :,:::',2 "::'''.'. : i-:. ' "..-: ';'',;' :: ', ':!''. ;: ',:,' ''-'i'" '''.;::::::, '''....:: ! ::::!;"''' ::: ,.: :-:-"':'::,': '., "...": '", : ::: '' :::::i''' ':i ::: '" ''''''.:".'r"::::.' ..!':. '-u: :: :: : : ' l''' : ". .',. '''''''.'":::, ::, ''.,:''''' :,',;;;-.,',i1.•::::::::':..."-:1,, -..,'.. ::: '' .:'',.i:":;;;;;,.....„, :::".::','";:"„.;:',:':' .:'.:: :,„:"":: ''",;',,;..,;:":':: ''''''..:".i:i:J.':!;.::::: :.:'' ."''''.''' ..":::;:' :::::" ..:;?':""..";Y.:. ''''::::'''.:: 'I'. , "T.: :".: '' ''::1'...'........ ":. .."::;:" :' ' '......'::::' .?:"; :::: , ' ' : ' '1"'.:"....: ' ...; '..:::, :"'.',.: ::: : '''':':.::':':: -::: :::::.:':':::::1 : : : :"' :': "r''''':.',:•;": ::: ' ':': '..":::":;,.., ,::',: ::::'i'':':;',,,„:: :::.. ;"1...: ''.::. 'j::: : :,,,,..y.. ,..::: ' '-',:,,,•,, ., Renton,WA September 6,2000 , ---: ::',i;•'.::::•.: ••:,' ' • ' '•.•„•••• •: ; , •.:• .. • • ,•:,'..•.• ',: : .."' ''....:.• ''.',,..,i'I ;. ' ''::'1,•'",.:: • : '; .'•;•:•••: :'......i';'''.,,, I• i•-• ''.:::: .. • •-•l'' ,''. ::'.•'..,.•,, ,,, ":: ••• ..:':•:..... •': -. ' ' ' ::::::i.••••:.: .,..r....!,,,:,.._.....„,,,,,_,,,,,,,:r: ,,,,,,,,,,„;„_„.„,,.. .i.:: ._ :....,,,;„4_,.,:i;,..:.....„.„-...._:;;.,„, ,,, ......_„....,,_::t;„,,i,,,:..:::„,...i.:.:,,,_I ,,,;.:.B.._._,::,• „,:14---- ---------,1- ----I .Office Space : • ..... .i i =Corridors/Lobby i o w l • .,•-•.- , -,.,-.; ,• i l , ,.. • , !„ i l'_:•`:''".:.1 --Restrooms l','„ ••• 3° .: ELEVATORS' .'N.:* : . :iN-144.71::r Typ. i i , ,,,„, , , , :1;: .STAIR I :';::' :, :,, • : ,,,,..: : , -:,..: i CORRIDOR, ' . ;',•4.;,:,,,,;.:::,7„•',:„, -•-•Stairs/Elevators - STAIRi CORRIDOR• . .i : .•- =Mech/Elec/Janitor r- ,u4 'i , OFFICE ' OFFICE ELEC/mEcH SPACE SPACE I ELECIWOMENS•9 MEN'S' 'JANITOR I :—. egidi , 300' N.T.S. , i 1 i . I I -r 1 OFFICE I SPACE I I I I I 1 I I i I 4 ,j: :::'•:.:::'.i:".:,::;": i.::;',4 _1,,*_„„„..,_, ,,,,,i,,, .., . - 147.Ft 't'.''''"•74:'-.: :: - '"' I'".. ''-'-7..-'r:ff.77'll'' ' 1T ''' .'.:: •: . ' '... ..."'1:.;;:.;::j.::,::: :-...::'':::.:, •,.. •,':':1::::J"), : '•'' • l' :',;:.:...:-..:..,::: ,': .:*.', .::;, ,:.,, .,,, , :302'.' 0 15 30 60 2:(OPUS. A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Typical Second Floor Plan ,i,-tpeii -1..ctvi-El . ..,.L" - - , - - , ..«...,,..... al iti • M�.. s A?g. 'e '�a� , in . T� " 4i" _ Q{ - II33 �' ,i- i �5' , am.w. � 'r it t L'i. .. _. 7«.<., ; - ,r . V)$ML • f j J� `t< Li F _iiF irk F: 1 x A:y < • ��` Y M•sraa"tw � �N �� �� � :_. � E ?si. / W • { K i. --,`'_`+j(■] Vr,ia2�"� • yLL<<f � i I`g/♦� . �,i�. '� } aw cat ryk ' *iK ! '; 4 <,.,V,.r ; ..?..,..:...:,:....:,,..?.,:..i.,,,..:::?.-..,Itsto T., .tite:,...,:i: :. ...-.,...''.:',..,..-...':',,egik,': it ,...1 •.,1f.,:.i l'.i:: Nv ..„1..,,,,, ... V, c a� !�r '' l��f� �i8 II, �' � i� .+ � j ��.�N ; k .. .. t.J � .� ,alw "�ttltat ,4 a1;:; t t, > ,<„ • i .£ ue; t r � ,. f tt irk£ .rea,' � Yt '. t .'.:„ y '., i nt rr�t ;arC f 'i - ,;''. . rm ior�r� —� € s e a _ . S f S • [ _ : . >.... -..,.re",,..,-..:.... .,,: or. iS4• ..3 i. �k '�i f '� `"aanx.rs"`t '..A• i (E .<�t, pp`e' ( f il � •45 o t .,.'£ , ' ` x<9'n ; :.£w 1'•Yi ,.::`. 4, ''-:-.:1, NtillWi.i':'' :-1 ,"'i..-.1.411'.-:.: 7.!!:,,,...7.4:",4.:i-•- '...' :1"-; :1 ztr-.2 1: liT1:: Al i 1..i.....'•.: •1 --,,...1.:!!t.,,;•:.-.'-:'..''::-:`-':'-•T; ..„ '::.,.....'04,.: ...''-',i: : ; ::.,.,,,. :,.':•':,'i:,,,,,,,)" . • /�� _.,� S i, i s$ v,- i,(, {.-, d,'.•�.». -.i r.... `:I : 4: t t •a �a k�yi : .<,, /", ♦ r£' -: (f, te. h i .. as j. ..,.€..: :3 K .. ,Y•r'H .<;,,;.<rc;', i. • 0. .. , .... ., ..,. .... yy ..,`. . . .,.. � a. is�t..> / .<.-',L... J�am;; .. ... , .. . < :..,<.': ."..,,,,,::::,. 1/4 moo`/ �+,��t " <«IG'c. '`•� 'K � c,,..�� tak��>,�r<i �9I� % .M'.: �', 'A -�� • < : ...r"..r '�:ri/'sa .Y.K X'.r:.�'e S.v, ":-e ..;y. 1..)„Sr i�,,16✓ t,ct. �4i' '9Y/"�` f s^ _... •:xa awz ..._ ...,<� c .n>r., CITY & F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • October 11,2000 Mr.Mike Ruhl,Director of Real Estate Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 915-118t Ave. SE Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST- SOUTHPOINTE,FILE NO.LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr.Ruhl: I have received your request for approval of a parking modification for the above referenced project. The City of Renton's evaluation and decision follow. Summary of Request • The applicant,OPUS Northwest,has requested a modification from section 4-4-080.F.8 of the City's Parking Regulations in order to reduce the minimum stall dimension requirements for standard sized parking stalls,as well as increase the percentage of compact parking permitted on- site. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application(see attached). Section 4-4-080.F.d allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria(pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.D.2): a. . Will meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity;and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code;and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other.property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The property is currently owned by Puget Sound Energy and has been vacant for a number of years. The three existing structures remaining on the site would be demolished as part of the proposed project. The Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 itzikn,__---- cno,.e.....asa resnIn:,ol 9n.nnst consumer s' October 11,2000 Page 2 proposal includes the development of associated parking areas, landscaping, street improvements, and utilities. The project would provide 1,108 parking spaces—including 605 standard stalls,480 compact stalls, and 23 ADA accessible stalls. Section 4-4-080.F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the proposed use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis,the building contains approximately 290,400 square feet of office space and 6,000 square feet of commercial/retail space—requiring a minimum of 931 to a maximum of 1,367 parking spaces to be provided on-site,which the proposal is in compliance with. The proposed parking areas include standard,compact,and ADA accessible parking spaces. The applicant has requested a reduction of the minimum 20-foot length required for standard sized stalls to 18 feet. In addition,the parking area would include 480 compact stalls,which is equivalent to 43%of the spaces provided. The applicant has requested the approval of up to 50% of the parking provided be permitted as compact spaces. The approval of the parking modification would be necessary prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved,the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by making the necessary revisions to the site plan. Furthermore;the modification is a component of the subject site plan proposal and would not be valid if the site plan is not approved or becomes invalid. Analysis a) Will meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment. The proposed parking layout includes 24-foot drive aisles which provide for adequate back-out distance and maneuvering area. Currently,the parking regulations allow for a two-foot reduction in stall length when adequate overhang is provided. Significant portions of the proposed standard stalls are located around the perimeter of the parking area or adjacent to concrete walkways surrounding the building,thereby satisfying this requirement for some of the proposed standard stalls. In addition,the Parking Regulations have recently been amended to allow for reduced stall size and greater compact parking spaces when located within structured parking. The stall dimensions proposed by the applicant are substantially greater than the reduced sizes permitted by the new parking code. Specifically, standard stalls within structured parking areas are permitted at a minimum size of 8'4"by 16' and compact spaces within structured parking areas are permitted at up to 50%of the parking area. The applicant is proposing 50%compact spaces and standard stall dimensions of 9' by 18'—only 2' less in required length for typical parking areas and 8"wider, 2' longer than permitted structured standard size stalls. The requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking of the amount and size necessary for the development of the site as intended. The proposal would also meet the objectives and Document2\cor October 11,2000 Page 3 safety;function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment. b) Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width,drive aisles,and emergency access. The reduced stall length,which would only apply to a portion of the standard stalls provided,would not negatively affect the required drive aisle width. In addition,by providing greater than the minimum amount of parking required by code,the project would not create undesired overflow parking situations for adjacent properties. Therefore,the proposal is anticipated not to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The project provides substantially more stalls than the minimum permitted by code (1,108 spaces provided/931 minimum spaces required). Although the applicant could revise the site plan to provide a lesser amount of spaces in order to meet required stall dimensions,lender requirements have necessitated a higher parking ratio than that required by City code. Therefore,as justified by the development of the site as intended, the applicant has satisfied these outside requirements by providing parking over the minimum amount necessary in combination with reductions in stall dimensions. e) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity. As stated under criterion number 2,the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the Southpointe Development. Decision The proposed development of the subject site would result reduced standard stall lengths of 18 feet for a portion of the standard stalls provided on-site,as well as include 50%of the parking area as compact stalls. In consideration of the potential affects of the proposal on adjacent properties and surrounding uses,and in light of recent parking code amendments allowing reduced stall sizes within structured parking,the parking modification request(copy attached)for the Southpointe Development is approved,with the following conditions: 1) This approval is contingent upon provision of 1,108 or more parking stalls. Should the number of stalls proposed for this project be reduced below this amount,this modification approval shall no longer be valid. In this event the applicant would be required to either construct parking stalls according to City standards,or to reapply for a Parking Modification. Document2\cor Y ] October 11,2000 Page 4 2) The applicant shall position as many of the excess compact stalls as possible around the perimeter of the parking lot so as to provide an adequate overhang for these stalls. I hope these provisions meet the needs of your development. Appeal Process:Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 24,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Sincerely, • Ae9 311v11441-(0-J- - Gregg Zimterman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. cc: Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira Document2\cor { Opus ivarinwest,L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue SE ` .OPUS 915 Bellevue,WA 98005 September.11,2000 425.453.4100 Fax 425-453-1712 pN,=•: CEO Gib Of.� S ? 122ti�� . Lesley Nishihira ^•D Associate Planner .� Development Services Division City of Renton Subject: SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal Lesley: Opus Northwest is excited and pleased to be submitting for SEPA/Site Plan Review for our Southpointe project in Renton, Washington. Over the last few months we have work diligently with the Development Services Division to create a mutually beneficial development for Opus and the City of Renton—we believe this proposal has attained those goals. . At the City's request,our design now includes the following: • An extensive landscape buffer along Grady Way designed by Bnunbaugh and Associates that works to link Renton City Hall's frontage to Southpointe and on westward to the intersection with Talbot. • Retail pad between Renton City Hall and Southpointe for perspective restaurant and/or coffee retailer. • Traffic light at the intersection of Grady Way and Williams Ave. In exchange for these concessions,Opus is requesting the following: • A modification of Renton's parking code for our project. The request (see attached spreadsheet), is designed from Redmond and Bellevue's code with some slight modifications. Our parking layout creates an efficient site that is in the"middle of the road" in respc�fchitectttral destg development,to similar rking codes. BesOpusllreque estscant that Greg . pact this request holds for project viability and Zimmennan look to an early decision upon this request. • Improvements along Benson road will not be necessary. • Conditional Use Justification for height. Item#28 outlines our proposal to increase the 50' allowable height to 53'. Please note that design development may change our request+/-a few feet: We personally look forward to working with you and your department on this exciting new project for the City of Renton. Sincerely, • AI-kk),_\, . tf . pJ SANTOS • DIRECTORItKE RUHL REAL ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE • OF AL ESTATE cc: Tom Parsons,Opus Northwest,L.L.C. • Bart Brynestad,Opus Northwest,L.L.C. Opus Northwest.L.L.C.is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies-Architects.Contractors.Developers . - - . .. .. - _- r. ,.,..,,e.,i,ia Houston.Indianapolis.Kansas City.Miami.Milwaukee.Minneapolis.Orange County.Orlando. Opus Southpointe • Parking code analysis SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal 9/10/00 Renton Code Bellevue Redmond Opus Southpointe Standard Stalls 9' x 20' 8'-4" x 16' 8'-6" x 18' 9' x 18' *larger Compact stalls 8'-6"x 16' 7'-6" x 13' 7-6"x 15' 8'-0" x 16' *larger ADA stalls no change no change Drive aisle width NA 28' 25'-6" 24' *1-6" narrower Designed at 43%- %compact 30% 50% 50% requesting up to 50% *less compacts • 0 ftllt'IR ursdc[[lt Sp.S>.Ir cc.,:,.nf 10.0 00W/11/r:--Ihra 1'..i t1\,�q.\ft \M.q l, 1,\•'rr, Iw•]wl 001'K S• - b I. ay.1, 1.N R 'V'OS 0001C-SS N1WROIV1 • • [11•W.fcp11M)]aY•1W lal P[ R MTh Y1SObY •t. a, Oar u1.f1.•/,1 OM MS R OOf'Kr •a IIC. WWI YiO a•us ('1.0.01/pYgnLL) ,11•,1 MI MS aOYr 3aUY11 SIOrWbY • .„Y...... I ,YM[SSO.'l] MI f[ I�aMl'110a/Y 1 IA OAY I al WM VOW.111 • :' !S0 f(V']✓�MaY. I .r :::: •• %301 IAM OYA�,7rrs , �• w alN,n —•:%�` R fo1'If`IrtK fn P OlM (.0-la•1• S]Y••.]I dr, • V •• ., UL� a so• a ,rr IN111Y1°11 anocr o0./ .. �' H`''S0MV1 ,Ofl).9r1,119+ -•".............. n a0t'1rr 1 aaw ��,�'/��/}� p CO a1.1 mu r,11)1 p[, '] ���_4 Al L'.,' .!• ^- `�010Y,01 $ .../ -.--,_- _ R21.01,a0Y11/ta1Ya,0/0K010af f�� '� •-••-• IOIYO ON/9W 9nN1 4 I �v VVd Y^ ni' �'•%�... � :'` �• . •4.,_ flrl -'1_W apvul .� gum aw 1Y1n mfa.9u _ ` `_.. '-L_ i :i {9c:5•: an.y °xtr]ry am 1uc ..; . • .0 a' 'YI�t 11� I �� .�.`� _ • .yl 1u�n 4s`' ..:,.`.,`•�V� i� �•' m""°` ------ a \iJ� 4. dN `V 1f � Yy-� lc,\'yp(6 ;' I U]S00 Y — I'III.�I i g (104'�' :f,:y. . r- --_`_ ,� _ _ —i—� ./- • .F.., 1 �� ... rr, MI! • ocNna Anal — _'-,. _ .. �`.--- I i 0I I • •• i �nm Nib . ( ; . i _ �y�]si n1l, fug''\ //'` _ . ' ,STi Ai •I B• vp ♦ V. 1•-••"• 1 i\.., ��j11 +` l.. + �/, III >S nu-n.l I • }q F • / 1 u • S�9wluwi •' I 1 it/.. :L'"" ." .'. .024 r ,ro• ,J [ • .41111•, 11uM \ ,I \ .. , I,r' I'•:; ,; �:•: \ j:.`• ' \ x ` , _M ,.�%'Y , ' j el moi///.per-I�I1r , ",:=f 1�� '• ':, y rrrrewrl o.]H • I 1 `� 111 e., •• • •i i1 o`aln.] /•.`••:;' • I I ��\ i4. 'i!1/0 ' . 1 I717/1111 u H ; \�l.l;,?a\]• fin•• M� •,• 1 1�....�.'.• 1 I ' �• ` - y ` m mcK i0�s,ro`av• 1� ��\.•`• .•` ,9 . h� "'�•'� • / '1 I r • v ornmine • \ • . .IV; -It ::- ':.. ale . 0,j4 fart ' \ •PA\ : •• IT , • r -� rn 0qT/1/1/71-1;//-11111[11-ii_1.°1•Jiy1 {f i 1 • j,"fifili fll..nS..aH 1 I L'''I' 1 I�',I�~' 1 La]n • 'III II'Iff I `�� 7.. �.` .....•y_._.l �.�r/;?'�i1f9 m 1 I :. -� :: ` ' .; 11 11! ' r•' �j�?w � ,.{`=-`SLR\�.:..�' .. - `�f'tH� .'/ • f+, •.tip • •ti•• • >. .�� �oU=�� .� p1 •!_ A... .. / .—'._'._ • Y • I 1 . 1.. \ \`.• I oili`� �• ea=il4: .�..��: s.;;�f./�,0yt'li •`-i t y --v _ A o 1 --�' ✓/ �L1araa 4. .. _ �.. `.. �11 R11.,1--`ti,! `-1"t`� j~' --1 -Ifyl:r9 > • -i_ .•- _- -'' 1 >; �1•1111I t / •.•. '.:^_. _`� —Zi•�� • —_' . /•/ "� Suclus. • y a701Nso•1 arM'� C :III �'�.. • •r •T�i �.'�•' y14 V 77 11 1 _ l - ;�l L•-' , — 7-r---�- . s -1 �,4 •—i • ultul a 9n d5 :a1i OJ r �P � YYOI,K a uS¢] . . AU, q MT 01 Ylr'r - _ I •"1 1 1 -•---•- -' . ' .- �-. ..:�:\�_ �,�.... -..ice:<:;';< . ',..::� •... •, ...... . '---fi _' _— _ �_- =y,�y`.�{ _��f�'•'- \ .'�?.'��„� � �hF'�r ' •._ •' •� •--•••.:. . •--r 1 1 • 111 A I`•'1► /�1 I �t 1 I�••� _ 111 Y I• � - _,'r.,' nit I � I� nninn=i�uJ .js:nl-, CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2000 TO: LESLIE NISHIHIRA FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: SOUTHPOINTE—TRAFFIC SIGNAL Per our discussion, the SEPA Mitigated DNS for the Southpointe project shall include a mitigation condition for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S Grady Way and Williams Av S which will provide access on the south leg to the development site. The costs for the signal will be shared by the City based on percentage of public benefit versus private benefit from the new signal. No further traffic analysis is needed from the applicant at this time. The Transportation Division will provide the traffic analysis to confirm that signal warrants are met for the location, and to determine cost sharing for the signal based on percentage of public benefit and private benefit. The traffic report originally prepared for the development was based on a driveway location on S Grady Way that was determined by City staff to be unsafe, and detrimental to future traffic operations at this increasingly busy location. The unsuitability of the proposed driveway has been consistently conveyed to the project developer throughout our discussions of the development proposal. City Code gives the PBPW Department the authority and responsibility to determine the appropriate location for new driveways, based on safety and operation concerns. The only suitable location for the access to this site from S Grady Way is at the intersection of Williams Av S. A traffic analysis of this intersection, with the additional traffic from this office development, will almost certainly meet warrants for a new signal. Rather than require a new corrected traffic analysis, City staff will complete the analysis to determine whether warrants are satisfied at this intersection for a signal. City staff will also determine the appropriate cost sharing for the signal based on public benefit and private benefit of the new signal. The City's contribution for their share of the signal costs will be accomplished through granting a credit toward the traffic mitigation fee for the project. The developer's share of the signal cost will be in addition to the traffic mitigation fees for the project. The new signal will provide benefit to the public currently using Williams Av S, and will also be of benefit to the public using City Hall. The new signal will also be a significant benefit to the office development on this site, providing a functional, safe method to enter and exit the site in both directions, including left turns. cc: Gregg Zimmerman Sue Carlson • - COMCUR'S"SBo NCE DATE I0'CI .60 . ( NAME IPZI T L L/DATE He-P.1N 1146k .4111,1 CITY OF RENTON N ,Wa--r-rc5 Air vj ioj6 Planning/Building/Public Works - nl MEMORANDUM .21MMi DATE: October 10, 2000 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator _/ l� "�j FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner-(x7270) `Av SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— 8 1 lir,/ Southpointe, File No. LUA-00-124, SA-H, ECF /� '' Summary of Request The applicant, OPUS Northwest, has requested a modification from section 4-4-080.F.8 of the CO% G 7, City's Parking Regulations in order to reduce the minimum stall dimension requirements for " standard sized parking stalls,as well as increase the percentage of compact parking permitted on-site. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application (see attached). Section 4-4-080.F.d allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250.D.2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The property is currently owned by Puget Sound Energy and has been vacant for a number of years. The three existing structures remaining on the site would be demolished as part of the proposed project. The proposal includes the development of associated parking areas, landscaping, street improvements, and utilities. The project would provide 1,108 parking spaces—including 605 standard stalls, 480 compact stalls, and 23 ADA accessible stalls. Section 4-4-080.F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the proposed use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 290,400 square feet of office space and 6,000 square feet of commercial/retail space—requiring a minimum of 931 to a maximum of 1,367 parking spaces to be provided on-site,which the proposal is in compliance with. The proposed parking areas include standard, compact, and ADA accessible parking spaces. The applicant has requested a reduction of the minimum 20-foot length required for standard sized stalls to 18 feet. In addition, the parking area would include 480 compact stalls,which is CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2000 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner(x7270) SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— Southpointe, File No. LUA-00-124, SA-H, ECF Summary of Request The applicant, OPUS Northwest, has requested a modification from section 4-4-080.F.8 of the City's Parking Regulations in order to reduce the minimum stall dimension requirements for standard sized parking stalls, as well as increase the percentage of compact parking permitted on-site. A modification request was submitted with the site plan application (see attached). Section 4-4-080.F.d allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250.D.2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 square foot class A office buildings and one 6,000 square foot commercial/retail building. The property is currently owned by Puget Sound Energy and has been vacant for a number of years. The three existing structures remaining on the site would be demolished as part of the proposed project. The proposal includes the development of associated parking areas, landscaping, street improvements, and utilities. The project would provide 1,108 parking spaces—including 605 standard stalls, 480 compact stalls, and 23 ADA accessible stalls. Section 4-4-080.F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the proposed use of the site. Based on the applicant's parking analysis, the building contains approximately 290,400 square feet of office space and 6,000 square feet of commercial/retail space—requiring a minimum of 931 to a maximum of 1,367 parking spaces to be provided on-site,which the proposal is in compliance with. The proposed parking areas include standard, compact, and ADA accessible parking spaces. The applicant has requested a reduction of the minimum 20-foot length required for standard sized stalls to 18 feet. In addition, the parking area would include 480 compact stalls,which is Parking Modification Southpointe Development October 10,2000 Page 2 of 3 equivalent to 43% of the spaces provided. The applicant has requested the approval of up to 50% of the parking provided be permitted as compact spaces. The approval of the parking modification would be necessary prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant will be required to comply with the parking regulations by making the necessary revisions to the site plan. Furthermore, the modification is a component of the subject site plan proposal and would not be valid if the site plan is not approved or becomes invalid. Analysis a) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. The proposed parking layout includes 24-foot drive aisles which provide for adequate back-out distance and maneuvering area. Currently, the parking regulations allow for a two-foot reduction in stall length when adequate overhang is provided. Significant portions of the proposed standard stalls are located around the perimeter of the parking area or adjacent to concrete walkways surrounding the building, thereby satisfying this requirement for some of the proposed standard stalls. In addition,the Parking Regulations have recently been amended to allow for reduced stall size and greater compact parking spaces when located within structured parking. The stall dimensions proposed by the applicant are substantially greater than the reduced sizes permitted by the new parking code. Specifically, standard stalls within structured parking areas are permitted at a minimum size of 8'4"by 16' and compact spaces within structured parking areas are permitted at up to 50%of the parking area. The applicant is proposing 50%compact spaces and standard stall dimensions of 9' by 18'—only 2' less in required length for typical parking areas and 8"wider, 2' longer than permitted structured standard size stalls. The requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking of the amount and size necessary for the development of the site as intended. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed parking satisfies code requirements for stall width, drive aisles, and emergency access. The reduced stall length,which would only apply to a portion of the standard stalls provided,would not negatively affect the required drive aisle width. In addition, by providing greater than the minimum amount of parking required by code,the project would not create undesired overflow parking situations for adjacent properties. Therefore,the proposal is anticipated not to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The project provides substantially more stalls than the minimum permitted by code (1,108 spaces provided/931 minimum spaces required). Although the applicant could revise the site plan to provide a lesser amount of spaces in order to meet required stall dimensions, lender requirements have necessitated a higher parking ratio than that required by City code. Therefore, as justified by the development of the site as intended, the applicant has satisfied these outside requirements by providing parking over the minimum amount necessary in combination with reductions in stall dimensions. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJ ECTS\00-124.In\pkgmod.doc Parking Modification Southpointe Development October 10,2000 Page 3 of 3 e) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criterion number 2,the proposed parking would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity from the Southpointe Development. Recommendation The proposed development of the subject site would result reduced standard stall lengths of 18 feet for a portion of the standard stalls provided on-site, as well as include 50%of the parking area as compact stalls. In consideration of the potential affects of the proposal on adjacent properties and surrounding uses, and in light of recent parking code amendments allowing reduced stall sizes within structured parking, staff recommends approval of the requested parking modification for the Southpointe Development. cc: Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Mike Ruhl/PJ Santos, OPUS Northwest LLC Appeal Process: Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 24,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\00-124.In\pkgmod.doc Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 04. OPUS. 915-118th Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 _ .war`;=� September 11,2000 425 453 4100 Fax 425 453 1712 -•-, � y • nP, F,4vlC U,�'-a\-lt Or r.�r v G1t �, ? \ 2 7••;' Lesley Nishihira ,: ,v D Associate Planner ~` ^ s'�"' Development Services Division .0'� City of Renton Subject: SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal Lesley: Opus Northwest is excited and pleased to be submitting for SEPA/Site Plan Review for our Southpointe project in Renton, Washington. Over the last few months we have work diligently with the Development Services Division to create a mutually beneficial development for Opus and the City of Renton—we believe this proposal has attained • those goals. .. At the City's request,our design now includes the following: • An extensive landscape buffer along Grady Way designed by Bnimbaugh and Associates that works to link Renton City Hall's frontage to Southpointe and on westward to the intersection with Talbot. • Retail pad between Renton City Hall and Southpointe for perspective restaurant and/or coffee retailer. • Traffic light at the intersection of Grady Way and Williams Ave. In exchange for these concessions, Opus is requesting the following: ■ A modification of Renton's parking codc for our project. The request (see attached spreadsheet), is designed from Redmond and Bellevue's code with some slight modifications. Our parking layout creates an efficient site that is in the"middle of the road" in respect to similar parking codes. Because of the significant impact this request holds for project viability and architectural design development, Opus requests that Greg . Zimmerman look to an early decision upon this request. • Improvements along Benson road will not be necessary. • • Conditional Use Justification for height. Item#28 outlines our proposal to increase the 50' allowable height to 53'. Please note that design development may change our request+/-a few feet. We personally look forward to working with you and your department on this exciting new project for the City of Renton. Sincerely, cA,,, , , . - -„,(43 PJ S 4`1TOS MIKE RUHL DIRECTOR OF AL ESTATE REAL ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE cc: Tom Parsons, Opus Northwest,L.L.C. Bart Brynestad,Opus Northwest,L.L.C. • Opus Northwest,L.L.C.is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Atlanta Austin Chicaoo,Columbus,Dallas.Denver.Ft.Lauderdale,Houston,Indianapolis,Kansas City.Miami.Milwaukee.Minneapolis,Orange County.Orlando. Opus Southpointe • Parking code analysis SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal 9/10/00 Renton Code Bellevue Redmond Opus Southpointe Standard Stalls 9' x 20' 8'-4" x 16' 8'-6" x 18' 9' x 18' *larger Compact stalls 8'-6" x 16' 7-6" x 13' 7'-6" x 15' 8'-0" x 16' *larger ADA stalls no change no change Drive aisle width NA 28' 25'-6" 24' *1-6" narrower Designed at 43%- %compact 30% 50% 50% requesting up to 50% *less compacts . r 1 1..,,,1„__ .;, , ,,50., LIE r PRE .LIMIN RY SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN-- - .:__.._:_-_-_,...:,- -,-,._ .. .:,...,.y„.,,..;:::;'•,;'.._,...., ,..._ -..__-_. : . ... _ . {. 1.i; 17, . I, ..,,..,,. ..4-.1-,-, ;---..--::--710,!:-;.• -. .0 M.D. ...• - 71;if.: .....,,,. ''''''-... ..".C.-::.--t; '..... .":;•-..:......:____HI.;:2V '......;•'::•,,''.r7.4.334411,..S.4. . 60-• '''''-•!.1--:".-7-•\.7:;;;;‘'....-.. .....''.,;;.2::::.Z.3":'.----'''::''':2,1.4;'LA...1.I'l'At".1/V9.••••:7;,.-S:: -.‘...:.","''••---` -7----•-•••••-( • i 7 11 7',. - k \ '41 ' ...s...3..,,•.......,_.-- - ..- - I • ' ‘k%,..,,, '' •kk 00 .. . "clx KC.NO$31217193as, -- ' •-_.,.- -•.. 1- \\AV'S „.,•\ e. ..,..-..'..• ....!•,k-11t1 .,. NIST. •EttScl:OP7t ."),-•.• I..• . ' .. Z •,..-t,...,......:::::::„.....„..-_ ........_\:: -..,....tot:: •;;;;:•-•:::":_:: -,-..„, 0 . •- • 364.101 s.r. ..1.-'''.. .„--L...... .,...'''':_ '417-‘-'-- kr").-'..--..1. 1r t Ph/1/4.1;VIII•ilial-i-- --..... 'CZf_cr...____:*.!.-„,,... .- “...siek --••!.'--,:....,.,. .--. . • - . .. • Z C, . .,.. ' .1.:%'.t:' -.'.'---:-.-.',.... ...i." '''.71 , Vaifigilin'.1', 4. ga IN' 117.1.....1Z.--"-. Akill'r-. \ \-.: -:Ama .. • -- ,// 4.-4,4 ',... . ••'. t., : --------,..... • ."1/ FArtylailit •-•••"--. \1..( ,,,,,,,7... .. , % ... z' ,00.-..,;;7,..„,1•,.A-_--......---2--S-,Z, -:::'-IA ......P.'-'1'1,'''' ,..1111-f- li•• • , )-• • - . • -:;../.....;•,,,1-N-•:.-4 ----.•.•..--.C.,,?;,:rr..-+ iiil ... • i : .. %ROO \ ., \ • . -- . • . ----.......,,, 2 0 (7) /' ../ ,•,7;_-:.:•,:;3:2:4• ....`,.7:I,•-.,:...7?..1( .:'...`,.:::4.‘,0' kv. .,,...,v..../.... : . . ..0,.. . , . ••/ • ,. /. ..--::':: ‘Z.:::.: s.......-'...,....s".`.4. . r--1, ti, 11111-111111[20-kfl \ -6, bill/111/4 . . 4 . tRifi 1 .c.,r,_...\ .....,.- .........;:,;.:,„ 31-q1-11-i-kolim .. ,.. ,..,..: .. i'",,5.4'71:-;.- •.. .... . •..-:•,-*:'.-•-f"-.-f --: • 1 r. r 41' --.4.•• - •\ • / --;'',. ....:••:" _----- '-' ........s.... ....... .,...;:: . 11.1113.E......"::":, .-........ •' ;I • •.' \ I • 7. 01-1.1.)y_ ". .... ,.. . , N , 11,1-ii#144 i, 1,1181.21711151 W • .• •• Ed. ..•/,‘,",PK_.-!!!, ..' - - w-..• 2)‘......s , \ . . 11'4_14.9 .-,-., -, . •" %.•,"' ''-•-::•••\\\• ..f. .........•_ .. . ,,,..r..--impr.......______=. -,,,,.., 1 i• • '''If I liaitsa-,-,I:- ' r,,i 1 • ' rcl's V . .."-•: :. \ vgi, ..• CURB•••0 • . ,/ ;,:„, CUTTER icip g t C...Z SI ../ • • '' ' ..slit ''.--...•'..-... .0 Is. . . . ..... . , ell .1: 'i tOtH:11NR-.7././p2:. &Om,ixviD. • • s • ) 0 0 s i BULDING A ---- . • /' s-N-i_i • I/11 ii."i 11/ s \ .9%,' Ar: '6.‘ E-, '1 COM•36.3t0 ar 0 C \ . Oitill I:41f,4 ,.'. ' a n. :<•••''''\••:6, l'7.1.• I 01/.1:l'• 71 a 4 \ ' ' I ' ,,,...t9•:`,. ...•- .(74 W,, C" .... Mr.)S.•••• . $a 1 .-. \ ...7.05190•64 .,...,...,., ,;./ , ... ,.,. , • '.....".".:"."*..."......"."...••••/ ‘'1::."--A"--- i , .. Ul ' iNlY 7. 4111 r 0 ,-:?-,1. .1-•"‘• '\• -8 „ --,--------7 ,,,....... 4-1718.10* 1 { 1 a r. „,..,i.H.;.\ 111.1!1!,,v. ... .:.:.*:,:i...:::.:.: 1/11.i P.1' 1 . .:. i ‘\s/:::i • 2)-750.00. CO ,I1114411, . t i, •• •••••••.. 7 ,•, g 11 DI/ •• < ‘`,:, ..-> -6 - ,. . •• , ,i--;. .,:. ' : • _.,._ :'-_-.`,.--1!`" v...4 ''.,..,.....) ... ,, =gr...- . , , . .• •.. • , •-t-nsle4 ...;t4.4. , . .. . • '..•....dio' .. . . ,, ,,,..„...„..... , 1 :Iiili .„,...,„ • N • . . (3..,;‘,..i • BUIL NG B.. • • 1 I.!) .4 '/' • .....----'\ ) ..ANCA \ • NI 3N0 Csr I 4.--, i 'ins'a.g5 cir •' .4. '''''' ,- . .if' 1 . 4 ,c,' :'. 1./..\_0. ) • - ''r• '.. ..-'. 4.:il-lah, ...„." '. . . .. . ,,,. /..u.Lar, 4. , a y, -----........:,,. \ .... - ._ . ?s . • • 5 .72 ' . `5' ,'. ---..- . (.,.*..) '.:.•x...• •• ---.- - I , 11 - - 'i. , _. i'g ---/.....-- I-I-I''''-'-,.- ./-' •'610M5%--..'=-.V ----.!." mew ..?I.• w . , ... . k.,..,. -14 g-a.I... "-......, 2,.ri/'4.y,ag 0, . .... 3 ssi al_Lo HI 0 i, • • • F.F' / ,' dS C4> :/:- ,•••g --- ..-. _____i_w _____ ----__7------__---• ,.--.. --- --_-:-.1.. .1. -77miNi..-•.101,,,,.,1 iiI4 - wgr-,11,-: 7'.'" ../1 I/in-trif'i - - .. •' ,. T 'want ri'l" I ,•r" \5)-b'\b) If-'.-• a • ---I.-- ' - -.. ._._...... •'-------•............"::.-...x.,-,;•,,-.:.kirr- •...,lior&..:* ..ommulki. . " 1 'Ts -r----------- •!' s•-•-• - y7 E.: • -4._ , ,'.4• '.lf.i i al• 1 'P. ck ' i @ ig 4)1)4 - 11 - LEGEND -...- 7.... -----• .• -N -.. ..N,i...e....,"..---......-•.'"....1L..._ ,,`•-•,•,.. ' t. t'"' /10 GUOIN ..7"...,SFE- --"-------..---."*.'-' ----." ••,.,.,_. ...... ........ . •;-,11 i•• . . .. .•-_. • • I . ,k . ,..,.... 1 ......---r......,-• • '9.4 . II I MICRErE?Avert I• .•1 ..: 1 0 .-..,..--0910.59- • -': ,. . . usr.4 cu66/ND COW ..----•-•-• •'''...'..-. , PIN:POSED DMONCSAN•NaNNEN, ----. ,. , ..-------.-... Ge '‘'••..t .7...---.._______.--------,, ,... . /.. ., "1-,,%470",.$ ‘D,)E• manure Kipeel.0 eALL ...... .....". y''''' Duelet4 0.: 10.200 Sr 00..00.0 it: 143.1.00 sr ',on, l`-' Ei si.ceES[Om.10 C.1 / ‘• °MOM • WANT PM ON ,N... TOM I . ...VA cr Ka sLOPC•31.ens sr I POZME4 ' 42..-Aa44::'..----' euxto5 Wawa RECUAttt ORM.ONK 01.1 M.ROY COOT A Ice mow •AlflOT WO ID.ma DINScol POO ottp.R0 WAS: SEE PLIN .• FIA1.4 rAtIMIS. RECIMED: ••1,014 Ta„,,I,a.., •. .-•, .. ., .. -------......._ •,/' t:6.• -7`"------... % -'''.:, • CITY OF RENTON CD EP,..1,1,413,11-0•••PUBLIC‘• 1 I.)MI Cffit/MIS MC AY ININly Ilt1,21.4 LOT CO r.I 1 N .... 4. -.7...- ,../ ../ ..„....a....4...,,5.3,...reou TAL00,ROAD I/10 ReD0IG e a•' INSI‘I.. PROPOSED: ....13:114C•1 War TAT VW 10...004 8 • • •t.p.0114 MI SIZE: r. (51.0.••1.0.0.0 VIAL Sa:e'/,'.Or(canal . LIMosC.)ME...: .• , -.'A-•', DE.atossfAuS .• i c. MNNE 77...C...7.0.II. ^:.. • . . • Ce•NNNN - c.,. Ir./. ,a.r• 0, . eS. NCtOINtD• 531-34.5t0 50 ft ...' 1 g .• '""'". tr`figal f.) 1 F..P.V4s4rNA0IMpr•••••••••.,V725,4 0, oet./I....09/,./2000 05 31 se..I.50 poInc•Infs. 17725NB.V•IY1.1•125,S. • Lesley Nishihira-Re: Southpointe Development-Project number.LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECf,-_f. i Page 1 Ti From: Lesley Nishihira To: DavidJ1061@aol.com Date: 10/9/00 8:36AM Subject: Re: Southpointe Development- Project number LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF k Dear David: 4., Thankyou foryour interest in the Southpointe project. After discussingyour concerns with mysupervisor ,;`.� P P ::W and the applicant,the public hearing will remain as scheduled. Although the scheduled time may pose an :: inconvenience for some, voting polls are open from 7 am to 8 pm,which allows enough opportunity for voters to cast their ballots outside of the 9:00 am public hearing time. 'i If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihira ' Associate Planner . City of Renton (425)430-7270 ' >>> <DavidJ 1061 @aol.com> 10/05/00 11:32AM >>> Dear Lesley: , I just finished reading the Application information for the Southpointe Development and I would like to make a request a change for the public :,, hearing date and time from Election Day(November 7)at 9AM to another • weekday, after 6PM, to accommodate the public. i I was recently involved in hearings at the City, and the Public Works Board granted our(Talbot Crest Drive neighborhood association)request for a . change in meeting date and time to accommodate citizen's day time schedules r and to promote greater input. This is a major project at a major intersection which will likely have ' ' impacts on the surrounding neighborhoods and traffic conditions. Please let us know how you can accommodate this request. `"' ravLd Jackson ,� 41�9?%Talbot'CresttD�iye'S� Renton,.VNA 98055 Ph: 206/772-1100 Fax:206/772-1248 email:davidi1061t aol.com , Washington State Northwest Region • �1 Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 , Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 September 25, 2000 Lesley Nishihira City of Renton DEVELCIF OF ENTTONPLIN G Development Services Department • 1055 S Grady Way SEP 2 5 2000 Renton, WA 98055-3232 RECEIVED., ; RE: SR 405, vic. MP 3.30, CS 1743 Southpointe Development • Dear Ms. Nishihira:- • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Southpointe Development, which is located at 915 SW Grady Way. We recommend that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any, would be required. We would also like to review the hydraulics report for any impacts to state facilities. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at(206) 440-4915. Sincerely, • Fob Craig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC • cc: file (---z-Arlalk .4, ,aL,./1.1i1',_' :---) :.,-" --'- l�r „ ,r c, ,4., _C✓1,I ✓ n it +ll 1 Jr 4 -J/ 74�,��, �rrb„"pal �1 - . ti,kQ - - s _ ii7P--(.,- -',_, - .4)0 ,14r v . . . , _. G -7 T ,-- ,-- (ThriU ( �• . . i 1°P 1 (',! )>A/ke City of Renion Department of Planning/Building/Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:a,ASrVu l6V1 --e,4AAce,a COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19,2000 • APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER firrY7aFAENTON LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way SITE AREA: 16 acres I BUILDING AREb A'�� tss): 296-!Iri 1 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEP yyie��w� and Hgaaj finer Site Plan approval for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 sq.ft.class A office buildings and ,@b0'A�`fit tafti etail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways,including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees,as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~ // p I'je{�taa� has rmlb, -(;ate a Le an ss r-(-7 , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - ,' / O/ /o-4 Signature of Director or Auth ed Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: OCTOBER 3, 2000 Reviewing Application No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated: September 19, 2000 Applicatio Applicant: Opus Northwest,LLC Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Applicant: Project Title: Southpointe Development Work Order No: 78739 Project Titl Location: 915 SW Grady Way Site Area: 16 acres Building Area(gross): 296,000 square feet Site Area: A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements on all roadways abutting the site will be required (Benson Road South, South Grady Way and Talbot Road South). South Grady Way and Talbot Road South have existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights in place. Benson Road South needs full street improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights, installed on the project frontages. These improvements could be waived by the Board of Public Works upon application. New driveway access will be limited to two (2) on Talbot Road South (south-full access), north (right- in, right-out) and one(1) on South Grady Way with alignment on Williams Avenue South. This access to have new traffic signal installed with the project. The project has submitted a traffic study that is under review by City Staff. Traffic mitigation fees will be required at$75/net new average daily trip. !� • ��� /O - -- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1ua00124 O 4`VY O U � t {v:nyry:%ti!'•r:r:!•:i5.i ti;.. ....{; {}: i :� ': .: '.. •: .. :v: � S:.'•f:ii'F:::i{:}:i::•:•iv4•v{:{i:x•••• 4: v., ::f.{.i:'.•i:•i:•:::v'•i:•::xi•.v:•:::v. ... '. :• v. •. .. . :. .. •.. v:: .:. '.i :'• :{ii :i x{:\r}y>•ii: Project Name OPUS 0-1-k ec c tll Project Address 9 15 • 6-1(?Afly Contact Person Opus NorZ-rv,ws-sr- Address . �11c 11P,'4'`^ Au- Se Su 300 ae vim`= Phone Number Permit Number Project Description 211 1 00o d , QLI),()) I o, 00u� (Doan" (ZF51' orZ( 6t- Qfz,oeaL-(N Foe2. SE Scre Land Use Type: , Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual ErRetail C-Traffic Study -'Non-retaif ❑ Other Calculation: i c .P.% D s oy o 3 l07la -Fri s x`I15 = a1 S,700, °° • .C-CZE-. .\T SIR BIZ N ors USE : 83)k-110 cJst = 702 -l-rtPs ?02 x- 5a, cp50.D- ' • Transportation Mitigation Fee: Z Z2) O SO• Calculated by: -K� 61-, Date: 101o5- 0 Account Number: Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Water Comments Due: OCTOBER 3, 2000 Reviewing Application No.: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated: September 19, 2000 Applicatio Applicant: Opus Northwest,LLC Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Applicant: Project Title: Southpointe Development Work Order No: 78739 Project Titl Location: 915 SW Grady Way Site Area: 16 acres Building Area(gross): 296,000 square feet Site Area: A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Any new water main, fire hydrants and DDCV Assembly (fire control system) must meet fire flow requirements as well as current Fire Code/Regulations per Renton Fire Department. New water meters must meet current UPC Standards. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required if not previously paid with redevelopment credit to apply. ez-veff`eAZ--- /0-'3-0 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1ua00124 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: OCTOBER 3, 2000 Application No.:LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated: September 19,2000 Applicant: Opus Northwest, LLC Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Title: Southpointe Development Work Order No: 78739 Location: 915 SW Grady Way Site Area: 16 acres Building Area(gross): 296,000 square feet A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water. The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. This area has documented down stream flooding problems, any release rate above the pre-development condition should not be permitted and should be a SEPA mitigation requirement. Surface water(SDC)fees of$0.129/sq. ft. on new impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. Wastewater: The new buildings will be required to connect to existing sewer with sidesewer permit charges of $80/connection. Wastewater (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required if not previously paid with redevelopment credit to apply. /0 —3-- co Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1ua00124 City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public works . ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION "REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19,2000 APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER NO: 78739 LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way SITE AREA: 16 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 296,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 sq.ft.class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft.commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities,landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees,as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services' Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ;/?//,/u.71 a u ( 2 , / )i'aoy B. POLICY�Y-RELATED COMMENTS ,/ 191..406C /UA- %%°A CuP u 6 � e Cr' �% `'� 4,7/, �� \fir' ‘07- ( ) ', l/iZe / Z�rta0 G� r71 e. ,2G -) i 5 / c4cc4 JO lafr? , ak de,(1-a.A../ed /ccri2,6' ax-c-- (.--e cil.-e"fr7 °20/-"---- Vo f s o -we— v ' q" .._.fob l fie( C. CODE-R LATED COMMENTS 16 / '77, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is neede roperly assess this proposal. -601 ao c.. a�7d75 Signature of irector or Authorized Re resentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public'works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: trtiovVtv. DetreAzpvvu2nZ#£OMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19,2000 APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira ��.».- ....T�. .ram PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER NO: 78739 2.:"..- 4 . LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way SEP 1 9 2000 SITE AREA: 16 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 296, 00 square feet ECONOMIC,UEVELOFivtENT, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearin E opprov::l for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 sq.ft.class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft.com e project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways,including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees,as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS StTLs 5 0IrS c.N/\7cCs) I 6'LC3N-;t-1t5\17 Pr(Z -- Co-yLIr'ti N -cD 'O1-4 C4 l S U'L 3 , �'' 'hod& 5 i!U1-7( l c_ 19(.6-A )Art— C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas ere additiona l ' n is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sign ture of D' ctor or u o z d Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rp .An+ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEP ir'jr I �u �C�� �i=i1�i APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesl.., �,k:. i, PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER NO: 78739 [sfj c • • 7000_ 1`IiIV LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way 111.1 1$1Ict SITE AREA: 16 acres ( BUILDING AREA(gross): 29I,000 I'tL:C4i:;ifl¢�}F. -.pN• SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hea 7� V I,,.e a • - for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 sq.ft.class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft.corn ercial - - • • =c includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees,as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Sew CL14/-c_c-Lze) GdlM- S, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS / L �/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 706 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 . • . ( ry S 0 C.) A ,e4 CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM • MATE: July 24, 2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Opus Southpointe, SW Talbot Rd & Grady Way Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM for each building, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of each structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each structure. 2. Afire mitigation fee of$153,92000 is required based on $.52 per . square foot of the total building buildings square footages. The square footage of the existing buildings may be subtracted from the total square footage if demolished. 3. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of sprinkler, standpipe and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical-to be used or stored on site • • • Plea.de feel free to contact me if you ha.ve any questions. _ _ City of Rer : Department of Planning/Building/Public IN-, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET oVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P\V'F01;: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 ArPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER NO: 78739 LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way SITE AREA: 16 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 296,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two, 4-story, 145,000 sq.ft. class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft. commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping, parking and street frontage improvements. In addition, the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one_ on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities . approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services 9ngY/ Historic/Cultural aural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS metre proposed site is located beneath a primary aircraft traffic pattern area, subject to high usage. The construction of the office building should be determined as a "Compatible Use" , with the determination to go with the land. Low-flying aircraft transit this area, both ascending and descending, and the applicant must be made aware that this will continue, and that occupants should be made aware of this fact prior to leasing. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this applic.I. with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add( :I information i •• eded to properly assess this proposal. jf Signature o rector or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • ii:: ''''„CO I ::::--::: • == � ____ =_=-_- D _ `,-. \1/4%„c________________________________________________ , , 7 . _________________________ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _-__�__ _ _ L�I ��ate` ! SUMO tit , , ,t. 1 _ ___ _ ___________ __-___--_--___-___-__ _---_-_ 1�i •�E 4_____ ,�_____ _ ______ _ -__ � , � .I , ® � 4 -:-:-:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-_--::::-tity_gttitSHEst --my-_-_-:-:-:-:-:-:-1/41.91.it, _ ,), ----14-6-:=E--SE:H5-,K:32-2:::::::::::-EEE::::"::-r:46.:,::-.:EE:-52-aEEEE::-..E;;;;E::::::::::_f::::_::::_:_::::_::::::2:::::fs.K:K-:_::::::_:Kj, r . -rIki_ lyrri4..-mn, .• '\,, -. .. .7:1-ri . _ i ips hiera7Z,----:.-.KEE_EES:-.3.3....W4;::;:-::_ff.:333._:::::_E-:EiEEE_EE:±Z-E_EEEEE:37.1_E:::I :E_:;:7:::::::::_-_--_Z, , I _I{ ; 8 :-. A.k: ' iiiiiv.- ',,:t :a. ,L,. -3 .A uN.,p,_,li ::::a:::::3-::::::-_-::-: pr.(,..TL..r.p4:o....eA_-3p...-j..=i4, 1_..._.,+ ��`` ` ____ ___ _ __ ___ ____ `'(l� + i •Li : t 0 'A171tSr..aE.. iiiJ (� 1 . _ ,11714' 54O I1n/t ' l (��� q •- - -- ===------==-- -=--:- k' eft, 1 ' r rd�' 0,- st .,,,Iiipriiiii rprakki 10,5141.-1.4-07,wicar._ • u,k ' 0 91;11 111(110, i_:i , ,,-_4_,...z,...1,li.,1,l. N-.....o,'11l1l E-7-—:_ 1 I,.a---,D;/,-,I L1/1,,;E,„1%,, 7r,.:-,.,e...w.1t,1 ! p4ja.,,t\j,.11-1P1'i.;m..,.a,4 [� �7 i _ _ C Cp 'N \ 11, ;; i;/'11 Ifs7�tLi i kLIX/- 1 I (1'1i \r : 1 • • t QD[Jiliaa9LiajUllank: ;WA 1 II.' \t__L__. 44)"ill rriall IN i $14r--4 -4ititu ,_, r N ilL 000 01 2 . t . . IR mi otv,i!g am ,.4%44;I 1Z gm A,4: F 31ibial 1 ' tie*likkl " - ,ii T°V 111.1117 MI 'I' dre4 ' . iThing i ' 7fil 1,, ': 1,e) . IIIP. 1j)1 1 1 title. v4 Pr i.:: :.,r„3:r4,I 7. t.4/1 Fp, ali r----- . ion '- a --J1 1 dil#Cri .A I .1.11fir . ..4414 CI!PI i li:kW 3.414 -;Cid g li 4 ''' :-II*on 2 , .,...- t g a.---.-"26: 0.'Ito''',ri IF l'6 A'ilork. d „b. - — 11111,Lik111111 .- hie, ..e?,. : .- % 1 ]iimi,E$ tx, ,dA,1,3344, " W 7 '1444 Mi..Ptii.ifilAP4 irj -1m a'' 1 • ...ss0" `��t :ems "®®®-,��!If f K . I) _. 'W OEMS ,1111§v liglizi2LV ' 16" .' ' : - . 1-140 tNillk 1 ..111 ,. ...,23., 1. I Vfa 0 7,ut . ciat.,7, { :._:..... _........10 , .- "Eft ���,�1 1����y]]] 1*.';/,yam' ra%igi, i .... _,.....- .1 0111:14714.WVOk\,. , - i Nr-/• i ktill2,--.A 1 v '' cur: ,_ . \,. ,No r ' " ill a, '. ' # ' ' \ 4'1 ) rihillii.viit% t'. ---.I ilk§ 'I 311:k 1 ,_../,,,,igm.. . ->Niii =7., . , a) ..irgain II ____,A .-. Pirtle - -it-i,...mii PP Nii-L---rillki:Pir77A.:-' _ ,.___I to III■ `� a s a 111 {,,, ,. ,.. i,. . ,,,,., i� a B toy. r i 'y^� y, MI l Appii . t-t I 14111 � � _ "- orb City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:I'01.Cce—, COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 3, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19,2000 • APPLICANT: Opus Northwest, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Southpointe Development WORK ORDER NO: 78739 LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way l SITE AREA: 16 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 296,000 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of two,4-story, 145,000 sq.ft.class A office buildings and one 6,000 sq.ft.commercial/retail building. The project includes installation of utilities, landscaping,parking and street frontage improvements. In addition,the existing structures on the site would be removed. Access to the site is proposed via three driveways, including two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. The development of the site would require the removal of 37 trees, as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and 10,000 cubic yards of fill. The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet),which the applicant has provided justification for specified criteria. The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I53 .05 C 5 nn,W:114-- 10a5-C. Sew 13i4a6 Cj3"Y B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - � -li' 1D IDS Signature of Director or Authoriz';•i-epresentative Date _ Routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA 99-186, SA-H, ECF Southpointe Development City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 153.05 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of darkness is also recommended. COMPLETED BUILDING It's important to direct all foot traffic into the main front entrances that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the buildings the control they will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. It is recommended that each office building have a legend(or directory) located in the main front entrance. This will assist individuals who may be entering the building to find their destination quickly. Any exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. It is recommended that these buildings have monitored security alarms installed. All doors leading to the outside should have the words "Alarmed Door"in red lettering and at least 6"in height painted on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Each building should have their individual address listed clearly with the numbers in a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. PROJECT LUA 99-186, SA-H, ECF Southpointe Development City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) Landscaping around the exterior of the buildings should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglar sufficient coverage to break into the buildings, especially during the hours of darkness. Parking areas should be well lit and easy to view from the adjacent office buildings. This will assist in the deterrent of theft from motor vehicle (which is one of the most frequent calls for service here in the south part of Renton), as well as provide safe travel for those conducting business at Southpointe. f -�� Trespasà r:,:. aa ►EEtemeatt° �5�� Enforcement • :WATCH'; • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code#6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ^Y r COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT le-N 235 - 2571 . ::5'..,,;"14 wog 06 _: I i,1 . e26 --. . 7 b , 7 jEi 7 :°- "� ? E 'A. I: a; 14 f�'• 3 ® a. 1:11 /i.i ® 9 iillglliff4 g i�: j E7 8 ' 0 J a g g 13 - 8 1-- 7 , , C ; 91� � e _ _ 12-4 �J 9 :i :: \ a 9 12 00,111) ;•t1 —fie ►� 1 r " ® � �... _ ` - ��al. P 6 E Rio 11 cm,- st ' ' I �.� 24 I .°T' kJ ° I 4:• ° ,•[ 1 �,[it- t 2 73 ® _ col I_ :; 1 �: a 3 n_�' •• 3 g� 3 • , , Q 3 18 © r :ce °� �Rle` �:.,� -- 44 ® ��l F_ `V - I� 4 rc_ . ® 4 1 11 Q al 4 i Isis z '•,, j.':. _ — p ® ls•�11 10 }g� ---� - C-1 "si. ��, I ::I o; 5 , 16 ti s 8 6 19 ( t1) �s•, 19 m - ` - -�.._ 6 .., ,. ?6 4 l5 ---... '118 ,....5 ® 6 . ® 6 15 GA`4 i •I :;; - 7 14 s 18 it �• tr° ro® y 2 i.9 ' 2 7 , 4 P 1_ v i.' "'; v ® 9. br .1q .ill . �c''__• 1 536 MIL t2 � `+ IO 15iss ��whys . H® 9 jigs9 1 12 ;531 - �l , �� •'; 6a r AVE. S !� �11 ` '°�, t~®o io 1 �q �, ''_G� �'� � ,w: is ' .TH'°'ST I. ii��r � ti h ,.'.I 12 o \S. .1'6 I Cf o El ' 'WILLIAMS 71K,18 p ° .., 2 •�ii r�.pc xc a r�etr'' (� I'.I ' 'LI N > :� • --_ A COND. 30 .!r J i••I tT 5 \h' it f.7 rri If -..r,i !,, NIi6 +jSilg -o rc.fscl,.f,S �C/ 1 .'/ •I'.� I 4 608 6 1S b2 tr �-. 1' 1' ;I 8 6 2 9 � ',1 r' „ 6O r "° 'iZ3 / II 0 I:•q ''•I jcEoR� • J , 14 ® , NC O 1.49 C�� I'.'1 I:,•i •� • coMo ' �, '¢ I 8 13 61 • zc. xtic Nc ( /4c e. 7 U v I` t S' 1 I•;: e�h IN ismul - I f I. KO s �_ UM —— Ti_a6 7� L„1. ;,z L I .T + ' G v t. Lot I • - VAC.•7T7-! -,77i: /9 i I' I v I�1 -- a. - Acres a ct, :.I 3 6.70 I6 ..• 1 =r�,r�. (ri \ n.mot ha aim iiAENr 41P. .,r nt, I16aC I''1 I '• •, II , SP INCAavAs • ,-, 1. � I ,�'. 8R05 i20 -�7_ • I .i I :c `� I.t �0 �, o 1,0 6 ,c----1 7 �1:! . . / Y 1C 8 � w I� , r ., l] 10111 -�, - t-Iit PSP1g. � CO J : ::j o WW1 �— .� I V y el Q1 F' 9 /:iI ' 1 'c •• ` 10 I. ;1 7 / i !,'. 'III -- 1 • r � 2, "Ifl------:1-16°-s12:4. —— �r r r r � i / I 1 ,.,, ij: \ \ Z \ \ J ;AL— 4. I / O‘-- .---S-1--7'sci, , , �• cc \\ \ �, � • '• � � 1 I4t 1K C� i 1\ , / +5 ,, (2) ,�• ,o ��• I � �— I 063Ac k, `�, s,0 Il ournooR sW,TCN,NG STATION (� • r, 2,f \t� ,e Q I I - 1 /tt .,� Rf. o 1 — — j ..._ —_ .. \ FF< tis ,.. 7 •••• / PUGET SOUND POWER b a 4-0 -Z--ii, e / •• t -- • <. Co `'--I t 1 I LIGHT CO . I ' • rr Su : STATroN� �. , B�v�',Q�r�Z/ye I rL.B " ♦ O 1! . I r(I, \l,.' (I- —1 \ / fir/ I \ , T. r ,,, (I) > 90 f�� — — __ - t 1-Qt` ,0 1 ," of-rf Acres,, w I J S.P. 009- 8T ' qG Oaa Al ‘' </N\ ‘'fia"../--- • R ti .>\ Q rL sT I 6T9.31 "e.ao o �1J 'o \� l L L . PL . - - .• \\ ���� `,f ®r[ 3c'��; Y1 9 10 11S n le , 0 <.\ • Yi 6 7 8 '? .27 Ij .� o . 551 �� '• I f It �J 0.91iAc I _\- . ' ti \ OVE�Rp(Ro , f I . ®rc.2a• Ks '1 ,� \.> Es ._, • <' 89 1 • 1i ®,orr •t3ei so \i! 1 .N/jam O I • ® rc.J1M'1 d �Sx' ,/ r o' \� "Qj 6 1 1 s rL 2f JLi�� IE 4SAG � ' 111 —ma i 7t. 1u 1: i rfn I i EI-7. ,�c•1<!\ o .—, I 0 4A AG• t•T - rt. 11 r , 41L 1_ _ _- \\ .... __________________-__ _ —_ - - i - -_—_- 1 . ty O11111:r • I . ..A Proposed Mitigation Measures: ,C N� 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED (DNS-M) 'I Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Develment DATE: September 19,2000 Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 90055,by 5:00 PM on Oetoher 3,2000.This matter is a . scheduled fora public hearing art 7,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton Ci:Idoes.epHoi all,LAND USE NUMBER: Septem 1 r 19,2000 1055South GradyWay,Renton.Iyou areInterested(nattending thehearing,pleasecontact theDevlopment rvicesDivision,425)430-7252,to ensurthat thehearinghas not keenrescheduled.Ifcomments cannotbsubmttenAPPLICATION NAME: SOUTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENT writing bythe dateIndicated aboveyou maystill appear at the hearingandpresent yourcomments onthe propolbeforetheHearng Examiner.Ifyou havequestionsaboutthisproposal,orwishtobemadeaparryofrecordandrecei PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and Hearing Examiner i additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Site Plan approval for the The project of two,includes inst lation o s tilitt.class A cake parkin aandostreet00frontage I commerci Improvements.aII bdidition The mouton fthexi installation of utilities, landscaping,o .Access p 9 Improvements.,n ci theon Talbot of d ouith an st ens ouch ra ry W ayd.hv to the siteis proposed viad II CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 three driveways,Including o two trees,Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way.The development of the site would require the removal of 37 as well as earth work activities approximating 15,000 cubic yards of excavation and i 10,000 cubic yards of fill.The application includes a request for additional building height(three feet over allowed 50 feet), I which is subject to special review criteria.The applicant also seeks approval of a modification from the parking regulations I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , in order to reduce stall dimensions and to increase the percentage of compact spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 915 SW Grady Way OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS•M):As the Lead Agency,the City of as peormitted underlthe CW543.21C.110,the City of(Renton is Optionalusing lthe l DNS-M process y to result from the stodgiivel Therefore,ect. impacts are notice that a DOS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single I comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 11,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 19,2000 r ) ,� • ,..•R / ✓'Vp't.,�e,_�A_-s',a. sooUcaipoile Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Approval,Conditional Use - ��\ '� �sq $,. / m PertnitslReview Requested: Permit.Additional Height Request,Parking Modification � 4� �y .g , �� Other Permits which maybe required: Building Permits,Construction Permits,Demolition Permits ` �, _ $• .,� , ` y,• f • e"fY: Requested Studies: Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study,Wetland Study I ® % • , �,y24' - t. Location where application may I •, be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, �9 `• 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 95055 p / : PUBLIC HEARING: Publicm er in scheduled for Chambers.7,2000.beforeegi at Renton Hearing /, i Examiner in R Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th b 4/t . � % ,/6/.;4 A `. floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. ( --,/ \i d ., CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW. III ! jt„,, �'�` `,,t\ , �/ 41k„v ao'4i � ��,.. Land Use: The subject site isn designated as Use Map and Area-Commercial Arterial(CA)on the j Cites Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial ofrei(CA)on the. I i '4�/3,00�.( s 1i'�` Vi ..`, ,' 1 p to Zoning Map.These designationss provide for a rdriety of retail and i _ . ,-- The propose essienal services nt and oriented towards major arterial shoes. I eons The proposed office development and separate retail pad Is consistent with both of these land use designations. i Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. I Development Regulations I Used For Project Mitigation: Works The oStandards,Uniform ject will be subject tBo u ldi g Cede,Uniform Fire eCode and otherPu Public applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. � NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION CERTIFICATION I, laa re.,2 2a3ca,ttit 1 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by•me-in 3 • conspicuous places on or nearby • . the described property. on .st , 1 I `Zaop! Signed: 0,e, ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for, he tate of Washington residing 6 44 y(-g," ,on the 34.4Q day of c.,4_ ZO c9--U ter..:_ .., ....u..,.... _. MARILYN�KAMCHEFF R ..,., STATE OF UVAPETPIRICS ciL2-7A IIAR�IY�i i THE T COMMISS106V EXPIRES �1,1�r to Pr�C;A3T;T:49T EXPIRES:6- JUf�E 29 2003 r c 741/4 CITY F_RENTON ..LLB Planning/Building/Public Works Department : 'Jesse Tanner;Mayor Gregg.Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 19;2000 • Mr. Jay Grubb : . = Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.: 18215.—72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Southpointe Development • Project No. LUA-00-124,SA-H,ECF • • Dear Mr. Grubb: . • • The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. " It is tentatively scheduled for;consideration sby,the Environmental Review Committee on October 10, 2000. Prior-to that review,:you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application: A Public Hearing will.be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055.South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on November.7, 2000 at9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan and _ additional height request: :The applicant or representatives)of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the,staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If-the Environmental.Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing:, Please contact me;at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincere) Y Lesley Nish` a Project Manager • cc Puget Western,Inc./Owners Opus Northwest, LLC • acceptance. • 1055 South'Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 - (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 3110-06, 3060-00, 2120-00, 2130-08 SATATE OF WASHINGTON 202305-9041-06 Applicant Certification I, cT•e7y �j24,/%3/3. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: Title Company Records ❑ King County Assessors Records v sT Brea Signed �b D Date 8_ - -4 :*▪ ss►ONF 61 (Applicant) ,Qom•o�h10TgRl, m•: -L.% :U to: NOTARY �i �, '°J8LIC % ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and fitt,� fzW �tt,,ir gton, on the , ^ day of V\ � •°P�t^;O`m_ � , 2000 residing at e ,‘ • • ••�p,b r•- Cs8s- (Notary Public) Ammmmmmommommmw ::::::::::: •.;:.;.;:.;:.:�::;.>:.;::.:.::.::.::.::.::.;:.;:;;.;;::;:::.:.;:.:.::.;::.;:.;:.;:.:.:.:;:;;•:;:ohs+* :::::::::::::::: :•:::::::::.:�:.ii}iiii:.. :.: .:: :. .i :::. :{{::::..... :.:: :::'F.?:i::'. ':::Y::iV::::1.:<:j::riii:::ii:v:ii::::::i:::::::{:: .........$.fir°49SL7ai•.:e�.•�.:L"....:. .::.::::::::.:::::::::::. :» :»:;:. :::::: :»>:»<:.• .. :: at:: otices::of::the. ro..oe�i [ � �I��.:�-.:::.:,�-::: .... . .. .:#�ereb. ;:certtf::.th....::n..:..:....: . :..p:: p:.::. .:. .. . .::. ... . • • ::..::,..,:,.:::,:::::::::. :::..;•::�::::::::.Date.:.......... :.:.;::.;:<:;.:::::.;;:.;:.;:.;::.;«:.;:;;<:.;>:. .:..:...............:..::.....::......::............................... ................:....:....... >::<:.:::... ..::: ::.:: ..... ..............................o,�t;the.:.�:.,.�.....�t. ..::::.:;Y;.;.;.;:.: �:.::::........... is ro dac li tP P• MARILYNWG4RiLYN REV 03/00 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 3 of .3 .................v:v:.:::::: :.:. ::::�[w:::::: :. .: .:::.::: .:.: :: :::.�::::::.:::iii ::.i}iiii:4iiiiiii: .iiiii::.i�:?iiii}iY} sititi :ti::.'iiY::.i .i.:.iiiiiii::.i:TSii::si::}::::.: .i::::::::ijjj :::::::::i: .iiiii:.i;:i:.i:Pii:ili>:iii::::iiii:� iiii::::i::i:::i::::i::i):ii:::::i: .......:.:.gin .............::n.:::........:.::::.i .: .........:. .. ....... ...-.... .......... ..... ... ..... . ......:::._.:.::: ................ ..................... .......... .. ................. ............... ............] Sf:. :.:::.�:::.::.:PFR. .At1d/R55.:.::::::::::: :.:.:::::.:.0 ::. :::.:....: ::.:::.. :....:..::: � I e::..:::.$alkk.EE.'7f((Cf..::.:::..2,flNT .:::::.J cv..55::. .:.Lracf.+/a1 .:: :tise... ..•T.t�:Yak1e:.::..::::.:::A?l+k.:::::::: .::::::::::::::::Oxmecs.::::::::::::::. �.�:::�::::::::.....A......................... t..................P."?SY...........................�........ ................. > :.;.;,:•;1J,v..::::-:....1.flt.Sz. � � �........??A.....-.. � my 3 MFU 911 172305-9017-01 _RAMAC INC 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD SE S GRADY WAY 2 7,290 A0.87 6342,800 CO 31% $229,000 251 $333,500 172305-9021-05 REIMAN RICHARD(TR) 912 NE 113TH AVE 900 S GRADY WAY RENTON 3 122,838 A2.47 IN 274 172305-9023-03 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S 601 MAIN AVE S RENTON 4 1,910 A0.13 _ $107,500 CO 43% 653,000 101 $93,000 172305-9054-05 TRIMM THOMAS W&FRANCES 541 WELLS AV S 1 541 WELLS AVE S RENTON 5 A0.28 $2,500,000 CA $112,500 921 $112,500 182305-9069-07 CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORA 800 CHRYSLER DR 585 RAINIER AVE S RENTON 6 A1.38 665,000 R-8 $75,000 901 675,000 182305-9078-06 KINLOW BENJAMIN M&PATRICI 4310 NE 5TH ST APT 13104 7 A0.15 $1,465,000 CA 4% _ $46,200 401 $48,600 182305-9136-06 FRIEDMAN HENRY&SANDRA 8803 SE 78TH ST 530 RAINIER AVE S RENTON 8 A0.13 CA 542,000 921 $42,000 182305-9137-05 MOFFATT ROBERT L 3709 MEADOW AVE N 549 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON 9 130,690 A6.66 611,000 CO 76% 62,324,000 274 $9,767,300 192305.9001-07 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERT PO BOX 811097 700 RENTON AVE S RENTON 10 130,690 A7.71 $11,700 CO 72% 62,688,000 274 $9,872,200 192305-9023-01 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERT PO BOX 811097 707 S GRADY WAY RENTON 33 2,850 A0.94 $565,000 CO 62% 6492,000 428 $1,316,000 192305-9070-03 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY PO BOX 512485 710 S GRADY WAY RENTON 12 A0.17 $838,442 CA 590,900 921 $90,900 192305-9092-07 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C 4509 116TH AVE SE 501 SW 7TH ST RENTON 13 A0.85 $144,800 CO 622 192305-9094-05 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 14 001 192305-9099-00 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 35 A1.75 $22,500 SF 901 202305-9005-00 _PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 /' s A2.25 IN 622 202305-9008-07 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 7 A0.58 CO 901 202305-9028-03 PUGET SOUND ENERGYIELEC PO BOX 90868 a9 A0.03 CO 901 202305-9041-06 STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 ' 19 A5.37 $135,000 SF $117,000 901 6117,000 202305-9085-03-000 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 1116 WINIFRED AVE 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 20 A5.37 6135,000 SF 6117,000 901 5117,000 202305-9085-03-001 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 1116 WINIFRED AVE 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 21 A5.37 6135,000 SF 6117,000 901 $117,000 202305-9085-03-002 TENG LENG SHENG HSU MEI YU 1116 WINIFRED AVE 700 BENSON RD S RENTON 22 A0.25 CO 901 202305-9146-00 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PO BOX 90868 23 A0.56 RC 901 202305-9159-04 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 21 _ 001 202305-9161-00 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 25 1,000 A0.15 80% 623,000 121 $119,000 257029-0010-01 TIMM TAMMY S WILLIAMS AVE S#A 2 536 WILLIAMS AVE S N RENTON 26 1,000 A0.15 80% $23,000 121 $119,000 257029-0020-09 MONILLAS ROWENA HUMANGIT 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 2 536 WILLIAMS AVE S SOTH RENTON 27 A0.03 632,500 RM-U $9,900 901 $9,900 723150-1455-03 CODDINGTON JAMES&CAROL 538 BURNETT 29 3,010 A0.15 6125,000 RM-U 63% $47,000 101 $129,000 723150-1570-03-000 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY PO BOX 2561 1 535-112 WELLS AVE S RENTON. 29 500 A0.15 $125,000 RM-U 63% 647,000 101 $129,000 723150-1570-03-001 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY PO BOX 2561 535-1/2 WELLS AVE S RENTON 3o 2,510 A0.15 6125,000 RM-U 63% $47,000 101 $129,000 723150-1570-03-002 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS HAIDY PO BOX 2561 535 WELLS AVE S RENTON 31 A0.33 $11,000 CO 6117,100 921 $117,100 723160-0595-04 UNIVERSITY STREET PROPERT PO BOX 811097 905 TALBOT RD 32 A1.28 $838,442 CA _ 48% 6671,000 922 61,300,000 915460-0005-07 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C 4509 116TH AVE SE 501 SW 7TH ST RENTON _ 33 A0.04 $838,442 CA $21,600 921 621,600 915460-0170-06 RENTON FUEL COMPANY L L C 4509 116TH AVE SE 501 SW 7TH ST RENTON 34 A0.61 $1,215,000 85% $159,900 122 $1,111,300 942350-0005-04 SPRAGUE GERALD N 13430 SE 43RD PL 31 609 WILLIAMS AVE S ALL RENTON 35 129 942350-1010-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 36 129 942350-1020-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL _ 37 129 942350-2000-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 38 129 , 942350-2010-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 39 129 942350-2020-01• SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 40 129 942350-2030-09 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 41 129 942350-2040-07 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 42 129 942350-2050-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 43 129 942350-2060-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL _ 44 129 942350-2070-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC _13430 SE 43RD PL 45 129 942350-2080-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 46 _ 129 942350-2090-06 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 47 129 942350-2100-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 49 129 942350-2110-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 49 129 942350-2120-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL so 129 942350.2130-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE43RD PL 51 129 942350-3000-03 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 52 129 942350-3010-01 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 53 129 942350-3020-09 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL - 54 129 942350-3030-07 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL _ 55 _ 129 _ 942350-3040-05 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 56 129 942350-3050-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL _ 57 129 942350.3060-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 59 129 942350.3070-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 59 129 942350-3080-06 _SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 60 129 942350-3090-04 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 63 129 942350-3100-02 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 62 129 942350.3110-00 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 63 - 129 942350-3120-08 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL -64 129 942350-3130-06 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE43RD PL ©1996 Win2 000 fie: 1 of 1 .. .. ...........: .. .. .. . .:. ::..... SST OF SURROUNDIIROPERTY OWNR • ': 3..:... ::ee .:.. : s>:> �eet:. >: > > : :> ` A.ia.. of.the..sub ect.site.:....... ..............:. ..... ................... PROJECT NAME: aaus APPLICATION NO: LU • 00 - l Z4, eV The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCE VELO�'� E�`T7•!':\ ""NG NUMBER Ch„ : RAMAC INC 3020 ISSAQUAH PINE LAKE RD S 172305-9017-01 ISSAQUAH, WA. 98029 SEP REIMAN RICHARD 912 113th AVE. NE 172305-9021-05 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S 172305-9023-03 RENTON, WA 98055 EL-SHARAWY P 0 BOX 2561 172305-9054-05 GUINGUIS K & AUBURN, WA 98071 723150-1570-03-001 & -002 HAIDY S CHRYSLER REALTY 800 CHRYSLER DR 182305-9069-07 CORPORATION AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326 KINLOW BENJAMIN M 4310 NE 5TH ST APT B104 182305-9078-06 & PATRICIA RENTON, WA 98059 FRIEDMAN HENRY • 8803 SE 78TH ST 182305-9136-06 &SANDRA MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 MOFFAT ROBERT L 3709 MEADOW AVE N 182305-9137-05 RENTON, WA 98056 UNIVERSITY STREET P 0 BOX 811097 192305-9001-07 PROPERTIES CHICAGO, IL 60681 192305-9023-01 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD P 0 BOX 512485 192305-9070-03 COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CA 90051, RENTON FUEL 4509 116TH AVE SE 192305-9092-07, 915460-0005-07, COMPANY LLC BELLEVUE, WA 98006 915460-0170-06 (Attach additional sheets, if iiecessaiy) 1 of 3 :.: WN ERS PROJECT NAME: - ' I.-'-P APPLICATION NO: The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER PUGET SOUND P 0 BOX 90868 192305-9094-05, 202305-9005-00 ENERGY/ELEC BELLEVUE, WA 98009 9008-07, 9028-03,9146-00 PUGET WESTERN INC SUITE 310 192305-9099-00, 202305-9159-04 BOTHELL, WA 98011 9161-00 TENG LENG SHENG 1116 WINIFRED AVE 202305-9085-03-000 HSU MEI, YU PASADENA, CA.91107 202305-9085-03-001 & -002 TIMM TAMMY S WILLIAMS AVE S #A 257029-0010-01 RENTON, WA 98055 MONILLAS ROWENA 536 WILLIAMS AVE S B 257029-0020-09 HUMANGIT RENTON, WA 98055 EL SHARAWY GUIRGUIS P 0 BOX 2561 723150-1570-03-000 HAIDY AUBURN, WA 98071 CODDINGTON JAMES & 538 BURNETT 723150-1455-03 CAROLYN/PT RENTON., WA 98055 UNIVERSITY STREET P 0 BOX 811097 • .723160-0595-04 PROPERTIES CHICAGO, IL 60681 SPRAGUE GERALD N 13430 SE 43RD PL 942350-0005-04 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 SPRAGUE FAMILY LLC 13430 SE 43RD PL 942350-1010-05, 942350-1020-03 3070-08, 3000-03, 2000-05, 2010-03 3080-06, 3010-01, 2020-01, 2030-09 3090-04, 3020-09, 2040-07, 2050-04 3100-02, 3030-07, 2060-02, 2070-00 3110-00, 3040-05, 2080-08, 2090-06 3120-08, 3050-02, 2100-04, 2110-02 (Attach'additional sheets, if necessary) 2 of 3 ••'':Y•:I:J.j.Q�Cali'<: ...:....:. ..:.:.......:.::...:::... .:::.:.:::::::..:....::.. :.............:... .„,, „„, „„„,!„, ?:::i?;E'r'i'lie r'.fi S:?' .r.'.;a;,,,; 1; al fotgtiiiii:: 1{asxiit`.W.t a: d i tlx:r;gifai:Ow i C:::::s:<:::::::;:<#;:i:»::>s»: :: >;::>:::a::>::»:::::::s::; PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: R.B. Boyd Southpointe • Puget Western Inc. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite 310 915 South Grady Way KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY:' ZIP: Bothell , WA 98011-8200 915460-0010-00 • 972500-075,1-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 487-6566 EXISTING LAND USE(S): • Vacant Puget Sound Energy Site PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: PJ Santos Office Development • • ''ANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Opus Northwest, LLC Employee Area Commercial ADDRESS: 915 118TH AVE SE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (If applicable): SUITE :3bb N/A CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005 EXISTING ZONING: Commercial Arterial (CA) TELEPHONE NUMBER: ("425) 453-4100 DEVELOPiViET_F'?„N\IIVING • PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CITY OF 0 0.4 ON N/A S E 1 SITE AREA (SO.. FT. OR ACREAGE): � ; iL NAME: JayGrubb-: L 16 acres COMPANY'(if applicablel: �^ PROJECT VALUE: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 53 million ADDRESS: llr8} 1:5;,.!7frtO Ave South IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No ZIP: Kent 98032 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Stream/Wetlands ;#W-31 Offsite TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: (425) 251-6222 • :. :., . : ,„n••, a,; 9<;x" fir; .,::v}`..ra: rr � ; : U: +. ppq. " r �Cry > M .4.qYu,5r: " L0 • is-t... ,S ,,, eii�•• ,,,,,:o,n; ' : • ,i v 81 ai � o Y j , ,.��s s eLa • i!,>..:;....:y:p .;;:,; J • s,.� ,:^Y`1:�. -:y'h, �•n.� k`Pri, p:r• y.}c;.ev..:,ri, ,,,:o:.::i sr. ,�„r,!r:�r..,,y,ia�• \•Irs rt•t,�:' :�; .�r •.rd,} - ,�,utri•:: - :.,,t-r•?- ..WV: h. Y' �•r?�, •.S ,« 1. is-r:• �f.•' �"�.a. ,b,ti'.,q..;,; :<ti�•�T�'":�i::�.z.;y,,;,., rpw.-� re ' t,I• .)., k<;�r:• ` o `; y� 'V' ?, r� > ''?k / J"i �,S:S4;F,;;f��c� ,�3 s:}Lnr }.£i o � `.. t 3` ;'' .h'•:' } ... � ry �"q••i?. :y'W,t".+' +1's,r7': Y?:'>��.`'' iN `�^y tib"::"< .ill1.S�,, b2p;," ,r. S.. b.�� ��F'kik •�:' �v ;t, ;i:' .3,."F`;;r,••,Pylt„�. '?'b�Y•:�� •t�;Y•�!� 'xs �.. !S-.r s. ,'�' Y•!'O• .�� ,,?. '�,�A , ,,.}S.r 1. � r n, .! '•�?`v'"�I•'.' `1'i,a •M,n,�..',.f :,.��i,. ,).q .r$',ti•:rl;.��q�x��';:�iti�ti�r;�vti:;r,�,i�i, 0'•�y: I .rrS>:.7 $ f •l ' •• ' ,•.' is Y �:.. .. " i hPy^iry�n",i r rsr.>•;s' 0 f:'J ';�'`3 ',z.' f `.d3'. '"fib. :r,.r ; �!`�l 'a:,ss' G ( E r,y'y�y,�rk:. ,.y:':Yi„;j}.r'b�s;;rsr7, ��a.fsa75•I N y�yyar „. ,Yl,l}r. .j., .11.Y{(J•''1 5555J Yr (. 'Y' *S [Lj' k+ i '�} �Sr,�'j ` Q W ... .rY ��� ;:�c,...1 `(,s•Vt ? lgo:t1Y.. ,0 • :` NP �'•'.r•• q ow. t�: 1to M e 4.r,:`?c fy}};';,'•,,. ,: ,y .}o�•d::?r: a ,,. �•S� :1 �. y i:����i'�� ?r� 1 '�`!� .. .�.lr+�,.rl�• :���^�.u+',�..•o.:.''� }�,r.I, �•�Q:3•;,'.: :� ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $_ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ • TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _FINAL PLAT . $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION; ) PRELIMINARY • WAIVER $ — FINAL —_ — WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS; $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ - - _ • BINDING SITE PLAN $ — SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ . VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ • REVISION $ 'i3'ipit ,T1 '6,)e,,' 'r¢v`?j.'+'Siti< 44.7`2, It- .: r"°� ,r,1r,,,!,.,:.. .""n1 ,t,<o' :isti .f 'Lryr �: •.%"°t "•i•Y:ea:0:4, \¢H<,w.;ii ;a:i .;,. `�..� ,��..�, r� rrr,.' . rY r t. >r�1 �! /, w.,PaN'ia�"'1S.,r,�} e'at: ,sf \?•xi l %k..::<:: ,:aii,4 0. ,Z .,i .,;,• ;•4 t n �° 4 t: �:y'• ,:d. < ,:??%% 5,,:jyns4s„r .:••s,,N �?,,a., 6`:fi+-1 -%ii., :..k,3 a.s.p wt. `F°i. ,•s ;, :'w$g5 i $i; QR y +,'1, •,.*•••},•��4P•'rt4j y.�•`;3sr r;::S...s"F i • �', :o•>,ai,.;, ;r•; Sint S; �:,t %1�}}•w , `..,SrS��, ,+r,ts, 'T�'; f'�' r�' „� > i r li' T" „•. �,o ?. \,:::>: ! ri't!rr :�• �: s'>Vl`;•.:,siL:• ><aaf:4�+�; .t•�.'..v. �° , ti�.> �,�.; ij.r .. � I,. �},•��'e••�, `{{i`q :,aC;: .. h,M}`„>� {� � '• � �✓.+�[. .5 ,'rb 'j`,7%'�!.^,�'. S,�l,�SS �':ft�n i�'C. J>r�•:]C'7�,... \\Vi)w y{. I, (Print Name1 R• S. i0.4 t9 , declare that I errs (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application._the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statem.q,nts and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge a AIM(!1/////, ‘ tit•. tro • <r ATTEST; Subscribed and sworn tato te, N tart ig In and ``3 r--`� t e for the State of \N A resicig atv \W I r' (Name of Owner/Representative) CL1,./i o,,! , one i:S a��'�BLIG A;A sv.S. - 2000. L . g.1.44 • ' ... .. • % — (Signature of Owner/c,epresentative) �j- ,_ ( ` w ����� • (Signature of Notary Public) IIII% O% :'•1' :fSYb' L•1 r. ..'s::V�o.. z•.A�R +Sir '?.l:l�.'zi' 9 +,ti. Ir'S.. •� so.. ..+ �.,,t:. ..�*,r, '"'i>:: is`:� ki,'?'+:?!:..S:%q,.,.;:•:5:.• f:Y•. �,�..'Sly,>..;.i .,�. C�:t.•; ,:.,: �:.;V'.:,,uit;� , x' t`� H`.SC,:`d�YL ba,:,., t„ .r�:� .1,•,, ....�•'' .:., ,.,' ;s;:(?r • �:c:�$: •4!•,.d; :•�` Fro. Sy,1. .t.. °'aH:' ::>,..,e�f„ : V\•• r$"i'>qs.S,. ::w:: ,�.,.;C,. 4, �1'•f:v} • �r/. „}1.� ::S,r Q' <•}:r. C, :Y.'c'"+U, ,b• Sr,} rnli$>: ,.al;x,. `r.. \.. •'•��r, 'y. r"• :,},;, �:.>,.'"'is.,, •,:�'n.;a,:.,rr ��5 '+f;i+,: ?,.,st .4... w.r ''i. a. .rf�I`$;. 'ea;� „ik'•'.�,t.F.7s:`. S. •�:p,, g V. rr�'-,•: ,l`h ,�,;n:< :sr f..v....,i:,.,.: ':�, 4 ee •e:'C .�!F�+,.'•" .�'�'�:"�a%' ��, . �s'„i t>.jZ'� �J•S .+j+S'��•".:a:: ,,;sit"�'::.s`i i`a,a�t.;...i+ r., �n,ea:, +5,ri+�. :t..S. •!;.•T.", `�� ,..,, \?;t.: N:r.:..4�� rhS? ♦5�,1,!.;' �e,r.i,�'i 4�':rnt(„". 1.;y �� n:4 '•c'.'" ,,�:A•: ,+7a,. r,� ..;,?,r,.,. .C .1 dt.�\".iwl��L'`.SS�1��:r.u., .r7i°.:.7Y::?•"V'"`,"�o����, a r,�, � :v. fi�s,�.: +> �\"':}it •s ,;7tii ,'�,, •:�'. i��;,.,y:,.y� •:;;v?r.::''•;w,.r;Fk•, ^4. it g_41r`,°:�,'.,�r a V g't rialY.•,.?5'.`.i'••••:ie:� ;:);,'14�• y_, . o y�.� x j;:y ",•',,7,;,:a•}J70,.' *":.4,.,;,kt1:'w.�r 4 art,. v to!: ,�`"h •M•T•uu=$s: s,: .�P:i.;'`"�i�4' '.'�'?�.� ' :.f ,1:{���?��rf.•,7 p},� �� �1�p .��f+:� ��'d��. �`. :�'�{;;�s •rigtit...,:;}. '.� <a�'••�t:a,.1:,?: •:t��.,,. "Crwg ,:`•,�� ,a l •�• 1,0 ar ::.k),'S10.••�K. ''� i n ,S :•s •. :r F--•`eY; :�,�6ti+•.•S,k •1' 7 t 'fit,",:',.."i,+,•:i�,l:i); �3rr.�:.i ;, r,��• „< ,:i��+� r, ,b1 �i;' '•;1+:; .l; t ? •�•, oM �u, r,?,r� v 's),,. Yd«,� , ;,£a.':r ��:.n.Fi4�;�}s{325:�5"�.:::;irrr.C,;�`y„�,•,.;:rc,.; '��� .bytC1 P'!�,rJ�r :st •" ,it` ', �.,s „3F .za ,;i'•�`i(iw..'•l,?i�. `sfk-;�'�its`�•I.4Y:s",t4. �'..''•• ti!le ti.e0,4t,{ i,••,,•••:�;.:F',F;.. �s r,•' ;,. •p,<:, �, 1+.r. p,..1. ,t,: 't`.,a,•,5 y 1 ` g 5:R,S,..1 d. fo1.,.i,, Z^4r.na .'sa ..•Sh.• ... r'V y�,.1/t1;:A� '•y +�\re :•• • ,'(:Y. 7f '4,r ,:y ,...jet `,,r."@,.,.t40....•:,•,r14:•• ,f,.,,s".k, *.���. ,�lv6,q,r' 6. •!�� `�,,, •,,;IL ;���,>rr`r, ;j:g:sg 'ors'' 1�a:. 'Se.r. `'��'i,Sat': 'rr''>, �.�;.b+�i.�`'•,;:.Y.t:.,..i;a lam:���,,>wCat2���c •�';}���t:�1,°q:,'. . st'rel�u2l �n�l�ii'+�. .� �,.%� Nrls?���� �:.• e;I�� ;�:�`' ��attn1'+:I�'sYi ,+raf;Yl�e�.�,�. e�;,.,: �., rw.� ;ss�iSi.�':4!S`1e•V••rRGu wa�`•:&. ';t;i>'^�'�+r:.k, `F� 1 :: . .�. :.,ti:,* .�.::.,. :'s;.•;wi'r{„ w'vsx's§!^;•,2::L'{^�• . ;;,,,,::, ''Fl:�,ta �. �ti 3� ..y�� � �:Ar ;'as.;; �+ '+a�.. .r�-!l+t.....rR,:.: ;��1:`A u.i.,.i .r :fit:"�Srs,''s, "` s .,i 1 i R f� 'u. 3.; _L,,•�5�.:, •...�+:r5 , t;5 11144,A y S ., .r.,b",.Y+ tf! ••��,, 'e?•:.'�� q3,.sf?W',�SY• r �`,:�.:>r,; �;1 '.:. •��,'h�'l�},:�, s t�:' ��!' ; .?1 •i�>+� .t r,••. '•r,., ,�4,1�'..;i'�.F?�l7litV.''�. �.Lr.��t ,$tCfp�lZ,.? �:Rt.,r �Csxfi;}�!�i,li'4. :.�r .,��•.•,l,,; ,.:?,s ,ay, tit 'sJ{+:J".' 'N, 'r, ,;..., y .>,�:.;Jti, } t .,11•,. .:..Z, r +,t,K,.'C!;. a, .Y, ; !. f,, :tt. , iu!.{;,C r' ,,,e .>g���,ci.: .,1.?e�n�, ,..•'. �a:4v�ra, r,�,><�ea.>k;;a•+`a��iad: l'�} ,�:..: �•;;..'�`.•. .:y�,�fi: ,r,,,�,+��': ��<lr•: .,,�, ,..t.;:.,{.�5,,��..:ts !sr�... <4�,:.�.assz:Ec�i`�.^.s, �<c•;�'•rl,r„�...:,r..,.}.,,..:.,......,,.: �?M.. ,....f�.H9:S:o:7! .> .... iri.3:: �.�i...Foe•.v.�4.!( `. ,.�5�..�Str''rr.:t.. �t:<..h�,:As:t�...c ,�1.'bc.�s:r..:�n�r"�c•.r ?C,.i.,ut: MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03f00 if SCHEDULE A2 :mod Order No. 398616-5K DESCRIPTION: r ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1 OF WALSWORTH' S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 23, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND • SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. • 2850; WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. TOGETHER WITH REVISED PARCEL "D" OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98-164-LLA AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812109014, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 150 FEET OF THE ABOVE- DESCRIBED PARCELS ADJACENT TO SR-515 (TALBOT ROAD) ; ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF EASEMENT "A:" AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812171951, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Page 3 AUG-23-2000 11:38 PWI 425 487 6565 P.01/01 :.• •). ' • • . Fax Transm.ittai i 0: ®Pv.S �v� FAX 42a 4S3^ ATTN: �..�g.�t� '�c� CATE: PROJECT: s SUBJECT; e?.c•»4 o-&- '-c�^�'--gc�►�, a n NiESSAC . v� �.: , S . �1'�O-cam Z�sQA -K, �c..,� W �. aS o.kc-*s'fir . C—.-(15aoa_ g\� ® — C—� --1 —� -rc L.1. litr219 BOB BOYD PRESIDENT • PugetWesteru,Inc• (425) 487-6566 19515 North Greek Parkway,Suite 310 Fax(425)487.6565 • Bothell,WA 9H011 www.ougetwestarru msn.corn • • • • SENT" Rom PACE CIF ` ?AGES -..( eugat Westerm, r ac. L 95_5 Varth Creek 2arkway, Sum to 3 LO , 3Gth�1L , K; 5'3•0 Li.-82Q0 -4.437-5530. or FAX ((L-25) a:8T-6565 ' TCITAI P_G11 PROJECT NARRATIVE SOUTHPOINTE 915 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON,WASHINGTON REVISED AUGUST 21,2000 PROTECT PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION: ■ The proposal is to construct two, 4-story, 145,000 square foot, Class-A office buildings and one, 6,000 square foot retail pad on the 16-acre parcel at the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South (also known as 915 South Grady Way). ZONING: ■ The zoning on the site is Commercial Arterial (CA), with an"Auto Mall District B" overlay zone. The zoning designations on the surrounding parcels are as follows: • To the north, directly abutting the Southpointe parcel, the City Hall property is zoned Commercial Office(CO). To the north, across South Grady Way, the properties are zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and Commercial Office (CO). • To the south and east, across Benson Road South and I-405, the properties are zoned Residential 8 Dwelling Units per Acre. • To the west, across Talbot Road South, the property is zoned Commercial Office (CO). CURRENT USE: • The site is currently vacant. The two existing Puget Sound Energy buildings will be demolished. SPECIAL SITE FEATURES (SENSITIVE AREAS): • The City of Renton Sensitive Areas Maps depict a"stream" on site and wetlands (Wetland No.W-31) off site of approximately 1 acre in size to the south. This wetland has been reviewed by the Natural Resources Consulting (NRC). In the Wetland Delineation Report, dated September 1999,NRC found that there is a concrete line stormwater pond and concrete line drainage channel on site, which do not contain any vegetation soils or hydrologic conditions necessary for the area to be considered a wetland. PS°G' 5 IV SOILS: ■ The soils report indicated that the site is generally underlain with coal tailings (6 to 10 feet thick) over alluvial soils (11 to 91 feet thick) over bedrock (sandstone) to terminus of the borings. Layers of peat deposits and other fill materials were also encountered randomly throughout the site. PROPOSED USE: ■ The two office buildings will be 54 feet to 56 feet in height. Each 4-story building will consist of 145,000 square feet of office space,for a total of 290,000 square feet. 10% of the site is lot coverage while landscape will cover 31%. Parking count is 1210 stalls. ACCESS: ■ Entrance to the site would be from two proposed driveways on Talbot Road South and the proposed driveway on South Grady Way. The entrance on South Grady Way will not allow a left-out when exiting the site. The entrance on Talbot Road South that is closer to the intersection of Talbot Road South and South Grady Way will only allow a right-in and a right-out. The third proposed driveway(also located on Talbot Road South) will have no restrictions on entering or exiting. PROTECT COST: • Estimated construction cost is$27 million dollars. Estimated fair market value of the project is$53 million dollars. PROPOSED JOB SHACKS: • There will be construction trailers on site. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. The following is a summary of the construction mitigation measures proposed for the Opus Northwest Southpointe project in accordance with Item No. 10 of the Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirement Form: 1. Proposed Construction Dates:Construction of the project is scheduled to begin fall of 2000 after all plans are approved and permits issued. Construction completion is anticipated in the summer of 2001. 2. Hours of Operation:The hours of operation during construction of the project are anticipated to be from 7:00am to 5:00p.m.or up to the maximum allowable hours of operation approved by the city of Renton. 3. Proposed Hualing/Transprotation Routes:Although the haul route for trucking imported fill material and removal of debris and unsuitable material has not yet been determined,it is anticipated that the haul route will be along South Grady Way and/or Talbot Road South,or as approved by the city of Renton. 4. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Dust,Traffic,and Transportation Impacts,Mud, Noise,and Other Noxious Characteristics:Mitigation measures during the construction phase will include an erosion and sedimentation control pond that will control and site runoff so as to not impact adjacent properties or nearby water bodies. Water trucks will be provided if required during the construction phase for dust control and flaggers will be available as needed at the site entrances during the trucking operation for traffic control. Construction equipment will meet or exceed Washington State emission standards for noise and pollution. Street cleaning will be provided as deemed necessary by the site superintendent or City Inspector. 5. Specialty Hours:It is not anticipated that weekend and/or late night working hours will be required for construction of this project. However weekend and/or late night working hours will not be precluded. 6. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan:A traffic control plan prepared in accordance with Washington State Department of Transportation and City of Renton guidelines will be submitted prior to construction. NIA 001 GIN0 PFN COMPLIANCE WITH ADDITIONAL BUILDING HEIGHT ill CRITERIA AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA for the Proposed OPUS Southpointe Four Story Office Buildings at South Grady way and Talbot Road South 915 So. Grady Way, Renton Washington 'of �� 'NG August 2000 2511 PURPOSE /OVERVIEW: The purpose of this request for a Conditional Use Permit is to request approval for additional three feet of building height for the OPUS Southpointe office buildings. The Renton Municipal • code allows a building height maximum of fifty (50) feet in the Arterial Commercial, CA, Zoning district. Additional building height may be allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The subject site is located on the southeast corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South (also known as 915 South Grady Way). The 15.98-acre property is currently developed with two former industrial buildings (49,000 square feet & 17,000 square feet), which are proposed to be demolished. The site is generally flat. However, the eastern third of the site is dominated by the steep slope located between the subject site and Benson Road South. The adjacent property to the south also contains a Category 2 westland approximately .84 acre in size. A stream confined to a concrete channel flows below the steep Benson slopes and runs adjacent to the wetland along its eastern side. The project would construct two 142,000 square foot office buildings and one 6,000 square foot full service restaurant along with 1,115 on-site parking spaces. The office buildings and restaurant are principally permitted uses in the Arterial Commercial, CA, Zoning District. The two four-story Opus Southpointe office buildings have a finished height of 53 feet, as measured from the fmished floor elevation to the mid point of the roof deck elevation. In addition, there will be one and one-half feet to the top of the parapet and the screening of the rooftop mechanical equipment will be from 12 to 15 feet in height above the roof deck. That screening • will be constructed of EIFS and coping that will match the architectural style of the office building. 7725.002.doc The reason for the additional height is twofold: one) to allow the construction of an office building that fits into the context of the nine and seven story office buildings to the northeast and west; and, two) to meet the market demands for specific qualities of office space. To be competitive and marketable, an office building needs to have from thirteen to thirteen and one- half feet from finished floor to finished floor. This provides approximately nine feet from floor to ceiling, and three feet above the ceiling for structural and mechanical components. Each of the four floors of the OPUS buildings measure thirteen and one-quarter feet from finished floor to floor, total of 53 feet for each four-story building. DECISION CRITERIA In consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Addition Building Height the Hearing Examiner or Zoning Administrator shall consider the Additional Building Height Criteria (RMC 4-2-120C.21) and the Conditional Use Permit Criteria (RMC 4-9-030). ADDITIONAL BULDING HEIGHT CRITERIA RMC 4-2-120C-21 A. "Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial street, which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit." Response: • • The 15.98 acre site is bounded by arterial streets, as follows: South Grady Way - a principal arterial Talbot Road South - a principal arterial Benson Road South - a minor arterial • The Traffic Impact Analysis dated August 11, 2000 by The Transpo Group for the OPUS project documents capacity on the arterial street intersections to accommodate the forecasted traffic from the office buildings and restaurant. During the horizon year, with-project, acceptable levels of service will exist at all nearby intersections including Rainier Ave South/South Grady Way, Williams/ Grady Way and the Renton City Hall/South Grady Way. B. "Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. (Ord.4404, 6-7-1993)." Response: • The project is compatible with a variety of goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (the site is designated Employment Area Commercial - EAC) as follows: • ■ Policy LU-169 encourages the consolidation of parcels to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. The proposal consolidates three lots 7725.002.doc into a single, unified development parcel of 15.98 acres with a total of three access points. • • Policy LU-170 encourages uniform site development and shared facilities. The OPUS project provides consolidated access points, circulation and parking facilities. The architectural style is unified among the three buildings and landscape style is master planned to provide consistency throughout the entire 15.98-acre site. • Policy LU-177 promotes special "gateway" site design features. At the prominent corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South, the project provides unified monument signage, wider and enhanced landscaping areas to strengthen the "gateway"location of the site. • Objective ED-8 promotes the expansion of the retail and office base within the City. The OPUS project will result in the addition of 290,400 square feet of new office space and 6,000 square feet of new restaurant to this currently underutilized site. • Policy EN-7 promotes preservation of steep slopes and vegetation to prevent property damage and to enhance greenbelt values. Policies EN-8 through EN-17 speak to the value of wetland preservation and protection. The project is compatible with the policies in that it preserves the wetland and while the creek remains in a concrete channel, enhanced landscaping will • improve its appearance and function. • The project conforms with land use regulations (SEC. 4-31-10.4), as follows: • Zoning/Land Use: The site is zoned Commercial Arterial, CA, with Auto Mall overlay B. Professional offices and restaurants are principally permitted uses. • Lot Coverage: Max — 65% Provided - 6% • Interior Landscaping: Required - 5% (34,800 square feet) Provided - 5.5% (38,600 square feet) • Perimeter Landscaping: Required Min. - 10 feet Provided - Approximately 10 feet to 60 feet. • Parking: Required - 1,105 • Provided - 1,115 7725.002.doc _ • The OPUS project provides screening of surface and roof mounted utility & mechanical equipment, dumpsters and recycling. • • The project includes direct pedestrian connections between all buildings and both South Grady Way and Talbot Road South and a plaza between the two office buildings. These include special paving and landscape to strengthen and define these linkages. • Sensitive area (slopes/wetlands/streams) are preserved. • Set Backs: Required - 10 feet Provided - Restaurant : 15 feet Office Buildings: 135 feet from South Grady Way 163 feet from Talbot Road South J. "Effect on Adjacent Properties: Building height shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of the maximum height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot designated R-1, R-5, R-10, R-14 or RM-1, then the setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the Commercial Zone. (Ord.4593, 4-1-1996)." Response: 410 • The zoning on the site is Commercial Arterial (CA), with an "Auto Mall district B" overlay zone. There are no abutting lots that are zoned, R-1, R-5, R-10, R-14 or RM-1. According to the city's zoning maps, the zoning designations on the surrounding parcels are as follows: • To the northeast, directly abutting the OPUS parcel, the City Hall property is zoned Commercial Office (CO). To the north, across South Grady Way, the properties are zoned Conunercial Arterial (CA) and Commercial Office (CO). • To the west, across Talbot Road South, the property is zoned Commercial Office (CO). • To the south and east across Benson Road South and I-405, the properties are zoned Residential 8 Dwelling Units per Acre. • The additional height of the two Opus office buildings is not expected to have a substantial or adverse effect on the adjacent properties. The project is compatible with, and less of a visual height impact than the nine-story Renton City Hall office building to the northeast and the three seven story Renton Place office buildings to the west, across Talbot Road South. Furthermore, the overall height of the OPUS buildings (approximately 90 feet in elevation above mean sea level) will be higher in elevation than the abutting Benson Road South, but will be lower in elevation than Interstate 405 that is further to the east. 7725.002.doc • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DECISION CRITERIA RMC 4-9-030 1. "Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general pu/pose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton." Response: See response to "Additional Building Height Criteria B", on pages 2-3. 2. "Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information:" a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. III Response: The proposed OPUS Southpointe will provide two new office buildings with a total of 290,400 square feet gross floor area and a new 6,000 square foot restaurant building. The additional three feet of height requested for the office buildings will not result in an over concentration of office uses in this area. The additional building height is only necessary to allow each of the floors to be designed and built to meet the current market demands; it does not result in additional floors or more floor area to be constructed. b. "That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use." Response: The proposed location is suited to the office use due to the fact that office uses are permitted uses in the CA zone and no traffic impacts will result in reduced levels of service at nearby intersections. The office uses are compatible with the surrounding office uses, i.e. the City of Renton office building in the abutting CO zone to the northeast and the three Renton Place office buildings in the CA zone on the west side of Talbot Road. 40 3. "Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required(Ord.3599, 1-11-1982):" 7725.002.doc a. "Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (SF and MR shall not exceed fifty • percent(50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. (Ord. 4404,6-7-1993)." Response: • Lot Coverage in CA zone: Maximum allowed - 65% Provided - 6% b. "Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard." Response: • Yard setbacks in the CA zone are either pursuant to the UBC setbacks or the minimum 10' landscape setbacks: Minimum Required - 10 feet Provided - Restaurant: 15 feet Office Buildings: 135 feet from South Grady Way 163 feet from Talbot Road South c. "Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers,public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures." Response: The height of both office buildings exceed the allowed height of structures in the Arterial Commercial, CA, Zone and thus a Conditional Use Permit is required for the additional building height. Also, see response to "Additional Building Height Criteria C", on page 4. 4. "Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599,1-11-1982)." Response: The project is not in a residential district. The closest residential properties are approximately 300 feet to the northwest,in the RM-U and CO zones. This would mean 430 feet separation between the northern most OPUS building and these residential uses. • 7725.002.doc • 5."Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five percent(75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-1982)." Response: Not applicable. Surface parking is proposed to adequately accommodate the parking needs and to satisfy zoning requirements. 6. "Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on , and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area: (Ord. 3599, 1-11-1982)." Response: • Reference the Traffic Impact Analysis by The Transpo Group dated August 11, 2000. The report concludes that the intersections in the vicinity of the office project will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after completion of the office/restaurant development. 1111 • The project minimizes vehicle access points; only 3 total driveways (see provided) to the abutting streets, two on Talbot Road South and one on South Grady Way. This will minimize the potential points of conflict between pedestrians and vehicles and between the project related traffic and traffic already on the public roadways. 7. "Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated of the proposed use on the lot and location of on-site parking area, out-door recreational areas and refuse storage areas." (Ord. 3599, 1-11-1982). " Response: Lot lights will be shielded resulting in downward cast of light and perimeter landscaping will assist in shielding headlamp light glare from impacting these abutting streets. 8. "Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-1982)." • Response: • Interior Parking Lot Landscaping: 7725.002.doc Opus Southpointe Preapplication S Grady Way SANITARY SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • Service to this site is provided by an 18" sewer main which runs across the southerly portion of the site from the east and into the system in Talbot Road S which then runs south before turning west across the Renton Village site connecting to the METRO Interceptor at Rainier and Grady. • No additional sanitary sewer main extensions will be required for this project. • It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • S Grady Way is fully improved with curb, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting adjacent to this project site. Benson Rd S is.a paved two lane arterial, with gravel shoulders and no curbs or sidewalks adjacent to this project site. • City Code requires a project of this size to abut fully improved streets. This will require the improvement of Benson Rd S adjacent to the site with curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting for the entire frontage of the site. A request for waiver of this requirement may be made to the Board of Public Works. • The project may install one driveway approach on Talbot Rd S. This driveway needs to be installed at the most southerly point on the site. The proposed driveway approach on S Grady Way shall be aligned with the existing intersection of S Grady Way and Williams Av S. Using this alignment, the project shall install a new traffic signal. No additional driveways will be allowed onto S Grady Way. • A traffic report should be prepared for this project. This traffic report should address possible impacts to the signalized intersections at Talbot Rd S and S Grady Way and Rainier Av S and S Grady Way. A traffic analysis should also be prepared for the proposed driveway onto S Grady Way, with particular emphasis on discussion of the viability of left turning movements in and out of the site and to determine any potential adverse impacts of either driveway. Trip generation values should be estimated for both the proposed use and the prior/existing uses on the site. • Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per net new average daily trip will be required for this project. C:1My Documents\MISC-DOC\OPUSSOPPA.doc\ajh CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1,2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 v SUBJECT: OPUS SOUTI POINTE PREAPPLICATION Southeast corner of Talbot Rd S and S Grady Way I have completed my review on the above office buildings preapplication located in Section 19, Township 23N, Range 5E and have the following comments. WATER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone: • This project site is located in the 196 Pressure Zone. • There is an existing 18" watermain in S Grady Way, and a 1 6" watermain in Benson Rd S. • There are several 8" and 6" watermains and four hydrants located, on the site itself. • A watermain extension will not be required for this project. • Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure; This distance is measured along the travel route. • The existing water service lines and/or meters may need to be relocated and/or upsized to comply with current City of Renton code. • Water System Development Charges of $0.1 13 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. It is anticipated that the redevelopment credit for this site will eliminate the requirement for payment of system development charges for water and sewer. • i S, O + ♦ CITY OF RENTON *11 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 24, 2000. TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Opus Southpointe, SW Talbot Rd & Grady Way Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM for each building, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of each structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$151,008.00 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the total building buildings square footages. The square footage of the existing buildings may be subtracted from the total square footage if demolished. 3. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of sprinkler, standpipe and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. . CITY OF RENTON PFCGIIM1 JUL 2 4 2000 MEMORANDUMuvsoN DATE: 7 p U O U ®EVELOI VE '` ,G CiTv TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner, . . FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division. Director RECiare SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: OFL,{ Sc -t,11,1T,-,; Le LOCATION: 5\ ) Cc.9 2ti o r 7.0 (;)',0 (�� \ 1 PREAPP NO. 00 - 3Z A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for \.V. 0 C.7 f\ •\ , Thursday, , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. !�7 -747-5A Preapp2 C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. l' J Proponent: 1/7gt\ea Name Printed: A f flt J1 � `�/ L.% Date: IA (Cr) Required - 5% (34,800 square feet) Provided - 5.5% (38,600 square feet) • Perimeter Landscaping: Required - 10 feet Provided - Approximately 10 feet to 60 feet • A substantial native landscape buffer will remain along the Benson Road frontage due to the presence of steep slopes. This will vary in width, up to two hundred feet. 9. "Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health center, convents preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located." Response: Not applicable. There are no accessory uses such as these proposed at this time. If provided in the future we acknowledge that they will be subject to the CA Zoning District regulations. 10. "Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought in compliance, with the provisions of • the Chapter." Response: Not applicable. All structures are new. 11. "Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not imposed an undue burden on any public improvements,facilities, utilities and services. The applicant of necessary public improvements,facilities, utilities and/or services may condition approval of a Condition Use Permit upon the provision and/or guarantee. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-1982)." Response: Public improvements will include minor street improvements (new driveway construction, old driveway closures,minor curb, gutter and sidewalk construction) and utility improvements necessary to serve the office and restaurant uses. 411 7725.002.doc • Opus Northwest,L.L.C. ! OPUS. 915-118th Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 iSeptember 11, 2000 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 Lesley Nishihira Associate Planner Development Services Division City of Renton Subject: SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal Lesley: Opus Northwest is excited and pleased to be submitting for SEPA/Site Plan Review for our Southpointe project in Renton, Washington. Over the last few months we have work diligently with the Development Services Division to create a mutually beneficial development for Opus and the City of Renton—we believe this proposal has attained those goals. At the City's request,our design now includes the following: • An extensive landscape buffer along Grady Way designed by Bnunbaugh and Associates that works to link Renton City Hall's frontage to Southpointe and on westward to the intersection with Talbot. • Retail pad between Renton City Hall and Southpointe for perspective restaurant and/or coffee retailer. • Traffic light at the intersection of Grady Way and Williams Ave. In exchange for these concessions, Opus is requesting the following: • • A modification of Renton's parking code for our project. The request (see attached spreadsheet), is designed from Redmond and Bellevue's code with some slight modifications. Our parking layout creates an efficient site that is in the"middle of the road" in respect to similar parking codes. Because of the significant impact this request holds for project viability and architectural design development, Opus requests that Greg Zimmerman look to an early decision upon this request. • Improvements along Benson road will not be necessary. • Conditional Use Justification for height. Item#28 outlines our proposal to increase the 50' allowable height to 53'. Please note that design development may change our request+/-a few feet. We personally look forward to working with you and your department on this exciting new project for the City of Renton. Sincerely, n4i-j4,1 (-Lig MIKE RUHL YJ SANTOS DIRECTOR OF AL ESTATE REAL ESTATE REPRESENTATIVE `77r.!T PLANNING SEP 12 22O cc: Tom Parsons,Opus Northwest,L.L.C. Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest,L.L.C. F C � � Opus Northwest,L.L.C.is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Atlanta,Austin,Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Houston,Indianapolis,Kansas City,Miami,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Orange County,Orlando, Pensacola,Philadelphia,Phoenix,Portland,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington D.C. Opus Southpointe Parking code analysis SEPA/Site Plan Review submittal 9/10/00 • Renton Code Bellevue Redmond Opus Southpointe Standard Stalls 9' x 20' 8'-4" x 16' 8'-6" x 18' 9' x 18' *larger Compact stalls 8'-6" x 16' 7'-6" x 13' 7'-6" x 15' 8'-0" x 16' *larger ADA stalls no change no change Drive aisle width NA 28' 25'-6" 24' *1-6" narrower Designed at 43%- compact 30% 50% 50% requesting up to 50% *less compacts • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Opus Southpointe 2. Name of Applicant Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 915-118t Ave. S.E., Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 Contact Persons: PJ Santos Jay Grubb Opus Northwest, L.L.0 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 915-118t Ave. S.E., Suite 300 18215 72nd Ave South Bellevue,WA 98005 Kent,WA 98032 ( 425.519.6827 425.251.6222 DEVELOPMENT N LNGITY RNiO 4. Date checklist prepared: SEP 1 2 MO August 21, 2000 °'[ CENED 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): Start construction late fall 2000 Finish construction late fall 2001 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: {'y • Traffic Impact Analysis for Southpointe by The Transpo Group, Inc. dated August 2000. • Geotechnical Engineering Report by GeoEngineers, Inc. dated October 1999. Update by Terra Associates, dated August 2000. • Drainage Report/Technical Information Report(TIR) for the proposed Southpointe Facility, by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Wetland Delineation Report by NRC, Natural Resource Consulting, dated September 1999. Addendum letter dated August 8, 2000. 9. Do you know whether applicants are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, please explain. No 10.List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. • SEPA Environmental Review • Building Permit • Demolition Permit(City and Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. To construct two, 145,000 SF Class-A office buildings and one, 6,000 square foot retail pad on a 16-acre parcel at the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South, in the Arterial Commercial, CA, zoning district. Entrance to the site is planned through either of the two proposed driveways on Talbot Road South, or the single entrance on South Grady Way. 12.Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any, and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonable available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Talbot Road South and South Grady Way, in the City of Renton. Portions of the site are in the Southwest quarter of Section 17, Northwest quarter of Section 20, and the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M, in King County, Washington. The site address has been identified as 915 South Grady Way. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one); flat,rolling,hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Ranges from 40 to 60 percent. These slopes occur along a lobe of fill extending into the northeast portion of the site. This lobe is 25 to 30 feet above the proposed site grade and was apparently formed entirely from coal tailings from early mining operations from the hill to the east. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils report indicates that the site is generally underlain with coal tailings (6 to 10 feet thick) over alluvial soils (11 to 91 feet thick) over bedrock (sandstone) to terminus of the borings. Layers of peat deposits and other fill materials were also encountered randomly throughout the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The alluvium soils are susceptible to settlement with the additional loads from the proposed development, and have a high risk of liquefaction for the design earthquake. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The earthwork quantities anticipated for the project will include approximately 15,000 cubic yards,of excavation and approximately 10,000 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 75 percent of the excavated material would be suitable for use as fill material, depending on the time of year for construction. As a result, approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material may be removed from the site (export), with the remainder being used on site for the required fill areas. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Soil erosion could occur in conjunction with the proposed site development. With the removal of existing on-site pavement and removal of the existing vegetation, it is possible that erosion may occur during rain and/or wind storms during the construction phase. To minimize the potential for soil erosion, a temporary erosion sedimentation control plan will be designed and implemented in accordance with City of Renton requirements. The site does not impose unusual conditions concerning erosion control. The standard requirements of the City of Renton should be sufficient to mitigate the potential of erosion control. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Upon completion of the construction of this project, approximately 70-75 percent of the 16-acre parcel would be covered with impervious surfaces, including asphalt and concrete paving and buildings and walkways. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth,if any: A temporary erosion sedimentation control plan will be prepared for the project, consistent with recommendations made by Terra Associates, and Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., based on the City of Renton standards and requirements. Erosion control measures would be designed and incorporated into the temporary erosion sedimentation control plans, then reviewed and approved by the City of Renton. Examples of temporary erosion sedimentation control measures would be the provision of berms, swales, drainage ditches, siltation ponds, and siltation fences. If required, disturbed areas wou7ld be protected against erosion with temporary coverage until construction is complete and vegetation has been established. Examples of such materials would include jute matting, clear plastic, straw, or even hydroseeding. Interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences, and straw mulch would be used for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils. Stabilized construction entrances and wash pads may also be required at the beginning of construction and maintained during the duration of the project. ti 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction: Typical construction vehicles After construction: none b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No • 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The nearest surface water body would be the concrete-lined stormwater pond and concrete-lined drainage channel, mapped as a "stream and wetlands" on the City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map. This feature is located to the south of the proposed Southpointe site. The Wetland Delineation Report by Natural Resources Consulting, dated September, 1999, found that the concrete-lined drainage channel did not contain any vegetation, soils, or hydrologic conditions required in order for the area to be considered a wetland. 2) Will the project require any work over,in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described water? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the proposed site clearing, grading, and development will occur within 200 feet of the drainage channel. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the -area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities,if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,if any (include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. All stormwater on this site is generated from on-site rainfall only. Existing development to the north and street systems on the remaining sides intercept all off-site runoff, with the exception of some slope runoff from Benson Road to the east. There is a culvert under Benson Road,which conveys funoff into an existing concrete-lined ditch running along the easterly edge of the site to a large culvert at Talbot Road South. This system will remain in place and not be disturbed. On-site runoff will be collected in a series of parking lot catch basins and conveyed to bioswales for water quality treatment. Stormwater then enters city stormwater system.** 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. Onsite biofiltration and/or water quality ponds will be provided. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff Water impacts,if any: Stormwater system will comply with current codes. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X decidious tree: alder,maple, aspen,other cottonwood X evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine,other X shrubs X grass Pasture _ Crop or grain _Wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _Water plants: water lily,eel grass,milfoil, other _Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees and groundwater on portions of the South Grady Way and Talbot Road South frontage will be removed. This will include approximately 37 trees over 6 inches in caliper, together with groundcover. This is clearly depicted on the tree cutting and land clearing plan(attached). c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site if any: Landscaping would be installed and maintained in accordance with Opus Northwest, L.L.C., and City of Renton requirements. The proposed landscape plan will provide approximately 213,819 square feet of landscape or 31 percent of the total property area and formal landscaping. Additionally, approximately 135,500 square feet would remain in open space adjacent to the Benson Road right-of-way. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk,heron,eagle, songbirds,other Mammals: deer,bear,elk, beaver,other Fish,bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. The site is located in the Puget Sound region, which is part of the Pacific Flyway, a known migratory route for migratory water fowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None b. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. Electricity for heating, cooling and general power Natural gas for heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The building design and energy conservation would be in accordance with the Washington State model conservation standards for commercial buildings. Energy conservation will consist of insulated building envelope, HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management system, and energy efficient light fixtures. Skylights may also be provided, which would reduce daytime energy consumption. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services which may be required would include fire, police, and emergency medical services, both during construction and after project completion. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Removal and disposal of any hazardous materials on site during demolition and/or construction will be accomplished according to appropriate State and Federal requirements and standards. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal noise associated with similar projects. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The Puget Sound Energy buildings will be demolished. Land uses on each side of the subject property are as follows: None. Not Applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: Compliance with the City zoning,parking,landscaping and building codes would ensure that the project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10.AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Maximum building height would be 56 feet. The principal exterior building material will be pre-cast concrete tilt-up panels. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The views from the adjacent properties and streets into the subject development will be altered by the development of the proposed Southpointe project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: Landscaping Painted concrete walls 11.LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The primary source of light produced by the project would be from the building and parking lot areas. Site lighting will be designed and incorporated into the project to provide downward illumination and to minimize spillover lighting onto the adjacent parcels. Light would be produced principally during the evening hours of operation. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Outdoor lighting would be shielded luminaries to direct light downward, and to minimize the backward flow of lighting onto neighboring properties and the adjoining streets. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project applicant,if any: Not Applicable 13.HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,national,state,or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site. If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: Not Applicable 14.TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Public streets serving the subject property include South Grady Way, and Talbot Road South. The proposed access includes two new driveways from Talbot Road and one new driveway from South Grady Way. The two entrances closest to the intersection of Grady and Talbot are right-out only when exiting the property. The remaining entrance on Talbot allows both left-out and right-out. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is a Metro Transit bus pullout on South Grady Way approximately 50 feet east of the Talbot Road South Intersection. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 1250 added and none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicating whether public or private? Minor improvements to the existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South may need to be reconstructed where existing driveways will be closed, and as necessary to construct new driveways. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The proposed project would generate a total of approximately 3,850 weekday vehicle trips, of which 437 trips would occur during the AM peak hour and 477 trips would occur during the PM peak hour at the site driveways. Of these trips, 3,676 trips would be considered new trips during an average weekday, with approximately 437 and 455 new trips occurring during the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: • Construction of an eastbound right-turn deceleration lane at the proposed access driveway on S Grady Way to mitigate its impact on eastbound traffic flow. • Modification of the existing center two-way left-turn lane on Talbot Road S between S Grady Way and the proposed southerly access driveway on Talbot Road S. 15.PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Not Applicable. 16.UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water, refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system, other cable. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • Power and Natural Gas : Puget Sound Energy • Telephone U.S. West Communications • Cable Television : AT&T Cable Services • Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm : City of Renton All public utilities are within the right-of-way or are already on site. The project will not require the extension of utilities to the property. The proponent will need to simply make utility connections at the existing infrastructure improvements immediately adjacent to the site, and then make the necessary service connections at the point of connection at both buildings. Opus Southpointe Preapplication S Grady Way STORM DRAINAGE: • A conceptual drainage plan and report is required with the formal application for the project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions for water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the KCSWM. A content list for drainage report for conceptual drainage plan is attached. • There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the east which crosses under 1-405 and Benson and crosses the southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. This system discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Rd S. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in S Grady Way and Talbot Road S adjacent to the site. • Since there are documented downstream flooding problems, any increase in the release rate from the site may require detention as a SEPA mitigation condition, even if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 cfs increase. • The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. However, if there is no net increase in impervious surface on this site as part of the development proposal, then there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Neil W. C:1My Documents\MISC-DOC\OPUSSOPPA.doc\ajh . CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 3, 2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-82 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner, x72701 SUBJECT: OPUS "Southpointe" Project General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment; Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments.may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject site is located on the southeast corner of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South (also known as 915 South Grady Way). The property is currently developed with two former industrial buildings (49,000 square feet & 17,000 square feet), which are proposed to be demolished. The project would construct two.145,000 square foot office buildings, along with 1,275 on-site parking spaces. The buildings are proposed at 54 feet to 56 feet in height. Land use reviews were conducted for two previous proposals on the subject site—Autonation (LUA-98-151) and Home Depot (LUA-99-157). Zoning: The subject site is designated Commercial Arterial (CA)on the City's Zoning Map. The site is also located within Auto Mall Area B. Professional/business offices are considered a primary permitted use within the CA zoning designation. In addition, all uses permitted by the underlying zoning are allowed within Area B of the Auto Mall Improvement District. The applicant should, however, consider the inclusion of retail or restaurant components with the project in order to create a more pedestrian friendly development in keeping with the City's vision for this area. Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CA zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Lot Coverage-The CA zone allows building coverage at a maximum of 65% of the lot area for projects not providing structured parking, or 75% if parking is provided within the building. The proposed structure would arrive at building lot coverage of approximately 8%. Setbacks/Landscaping—The CA zone requires a minimum landscaped setback of 10 feet from all street frontages. No other landscaped setbacks are required in the zone, unless located adjacent to property designated with residential zoning. The additional landscape requirements of the Auto Mall Overlay District do not apply to non-auto related uses when located in Area B. The proposal appears to satisfy the required street frontage landscaped setback. At the time of formal application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes, and types of the proposed plantings will be required. In addition, the parking regulations require large parking areas (10,000 square feet or greater in size) to provide a minimum of 5% of area within the parking lot landscaped in a pattern that reduces the barren appearance of the parking lot. All landscape areas are required to be a minimum width of 5 Pre00-821 • feet and must have underground sprinkling systems installed. The site plan will be required to call out the percentage of the parking area provided as landscaping. Height—The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. Heights may exceed the maximum limitation with a conditional use permit. There are three specific criteria that would be considered for the request(see attached code section RMC 4-2-120.C.21 and further conditional use discussion below). Screening—Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-09007. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details on the proposed methods of screening. Pedestrian Connection—All development in the CA zone is required to provide a direct and clear pedestrian connection from sidewalks to building entrances. The site plan would need to clearly indicate a connection from the existing sidewalk along both Grady Way and Talbot Road to the entrances of the buildings. Parking—The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. For the proposed office buildings, a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces would be required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Based on the size of the proposed buildings, a minimum of 871 to a maximum of 1,307 parking spaces would be required on-site. The site plan submitted indicates 1,275 spaces would be provided, including 698 standard and 577 compact stalls. The parking regulations specify that compact spaces are not to exceed 30% of the parking spaces provided. Therefore, the site plan would need to be revised to limit the proposed amount of compact spaces to a maximum of 383 stalls. In addition, a minimum of 33 stalls would need to be designated as ADA accessible spaces. The parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9 feet x 20 feet and compact dimensions of 8%2 feet x 16 feet. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for 90 degree parking,stalls. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The proposal appears to generally comply with the parking regulations. However, stall dimensions and aisle widths will be required on the site plan submitted with the formal land use application. Sensitive Areas: The eastern third of the site is dominated by the steep slope located between the subject site and Benson Road South. The adjacent property to the south also contains a Category 2 wetland approximately .84 acre in size. A stream confined to a concrete channel flows below the steep Benson slopes and runs adjacent to the wetland along its eastern side. Slopes: If"sensitive"slopes (25%to 40%)or"protected"slopes (40% or greater with a minimum vertical rise of 15 feet) are present on or within 50 feet of the subject site, the City's Critical Areas Regulations require a geotechnical study prepared by a qualified engineer be submitted with the land use application. The study would need to.include a slope delineation map in order to staff to verify the development's compliance with the appropriate setbacks from these areas. Development on protected slopes is prohibited by the regulations and restrictions for development on sensitive slopes may also apply. Wetlands/Streams: The City's Critical Areas Regulations require a wetland classification study for a development proposal when a wetland is located within 100 feet of the site, even if located on a separate parcel. A minimum buffer width of 50 feet is typically required for Category 2 wetlands. The applicant may request a modification of the required buffer width for buffer averaging provided 8 criteria are satisfied pursuant to RMC section 4-4-3-050.W.f., if necessary. The Critical Areas Regulations also prohibit land clearing or tree cutting within 25 feet of a creek or stream. Currently,the existing Puget Power facility is paved right up to the concrete channel. If any disturbance is proposed within the required 25-foot buffer, a variance from the Critical Areas Regulations would_be necessary. Pre00-821 + n The formal land use application would need to include a Wetland and Stream Study and Delineation, which indicates the boundaries of the wetland and stream, as well as required buffer areas. A Wetland Study conducted for a previous development-proposal would be acceptable as long as the report was written within the last five years and appropriately addresses the critical areas associated with the site. Signage: Only one freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) is permitted per street frontage for each individual parcel. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet(150 square feet per face if a two face sign). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign,wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20%of the façade to which it is applied is also permitted. Permit Requirements: If the demolition of the existing structures is included with the development proposal, the project would require approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit as well as Environmental (SEPA) Review. The review process would require a public hearing and would be completed in an estimated time frame of 8 to 12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee would be $2,500.00, plus $.33 per mailing label required for notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. If building demolition is proposed alone, only Environmental (SEPA) Review would be necessary. This process would be conducted within an estimated timeframe of 4 to 6 weeks with an application fee of $1,000.00, plus $.33 per mailing label. Please refer to the attached application packages for a complete list of submittal requirements. In addition to the required land use permits, separate building/demolition, construction and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently-with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Conditional Use/Site Plan Criteria: In order to obtain approval for additional building height, the proposal must satisfy specific conditional use criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain types of development in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed development must be deemed consistent with other existing and potential developments within the general area of the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit based on the project's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria: • Location Criteria • Comprehensive Plan • Effect on Adjacent Properties, including lot coverage, yards and height In addition,the review of the proposed building height would be incorporated with the site plan criteria typically used for development proposals of this scale. Fees: In addition to the applicable land use, building, construction and sign permit fees;the following mitigation fees may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre00-82\ 4-2-120C compliance with the maximum set- possible, the required 2% landscaping for back; or adjacent properties should be contiguous. c. any function of the use which serves 25. Eaves,cornices,steps,terraces,platforms_ the public health, safety or welfare and porches having no roof covering and would be materially impaired by the being not over 42' high may be built within required setback. a front yard. S0f In consideration of a request for condi- 26. Exception:When 40%or more, on front ,lk ( J tional use permit for additional building foot basis, of all property on 1 side of a height the Hearing Examiner or Zoning street between 2 intersecting streets at the Administrator shall consider the following time of the passage of this Code has been factors in addition to the criteria in RMC built up with buildings having a minimum 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits, among front yard of more or less depth than that all other relevant information. established by the Code, and provided, a. . Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial that the majority of such front yards do not streets which have sufficient capacity vary more than 6'in depth, no building to accommodate traffic generated by shall be built within or shall any portion, the development. Developments are save as above excepted, project into such encouraged to locate in areas served minimum front yard; provided, further, that by transit. no new buildings be required to set back more than 35'from the street line in the ' b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed R-2 or R-3 Residential Districts, nor more use shall be compatible with the gen- than 2'farther than any building on an eral purpose, goals, objectives and adjoining lot and that this regulation shall standards of the Comprehensive not be so interpreted as to reduce a Plan, the zoning regulations and any required front yard to less than 10'in other plan, program, map or regula- depth. (Ord. 1472, 2-18-1953) tion of the City. (Ord. 4404, 6-7-1993) 27. Includes major or secondary arterials as / c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Build- defined in the arterial street map of the ings height shall not result in substan- City's 6 Year Transportation Improvement tial or undue adverse effects on Plan. Arterial Streets within the Central adjacent property. When a building in Business District—bounded by the Cedar excess of.the maximum height is pro- River, FAl 405 Freeway, South 4th Street, posed adjacent to or abuts a lot desig- Shattuck Avenue South, South Second nated R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-14 or Street, and Logan Avenue South—shall be RM-I, then the setbacks shall be exempt from this setback requirement. equivalent to the requirements of the 28. Exception for Community Facilities: The adjacent residential zone if the set- following development standards shall back standards exceed the require- apply to all uses having a"P"suffix desig- ments of the Commercial Zone. (Ord. nation. Where these standards conflict 4593, 4-1-1996) with those generally applicable, these 22. Heights may exceed the maximum height standards shall apply: under Hearing Examiner conditional use a. Publicly owned structures housing permit. such uses shall be permitted an addi- 23. Exceptions: Eaves and cornices may tional 15'in height above that other- extend over the required side yard for a wise permitted in the Zone if"pitched distance of not more than 2'. Accessory roofs",as defined herein, are used for buildings when erected so that the entire at least 60%or more of the roof sur- building is within a distance of 30'from the face of both primary and accessory rear lot line may also occupy the side yard structures. of an inside lot line. (Ord. 1905, 8-15-1961) b. In addition, in zones where the maxi- 24. These areas should not be dispersed mum permitted building height is less throughout a site, but should be aggre- than 75', the maximum height of a gated in one portion of the property.Where publicly owned structure housing a 2- 162.3 (Revised 12/99) CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: August 2, 2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Owen Dennison_/ SUBJECT: Opus Southpointe Preapplication(00-82) The site is designated Employment Area-Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan.Land uses intended for the EAC designation are those that require large amounts of land and high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. (Objective LU-AA) Retail is the primary use envisioned for the designation. Policy LU-177 states, "Retail and/or services should comprise a majority of the total development within Employment Area-Commercial designations." The site is large and highly visible from a heavily traveled arterial, in other words, it would be a prime candidate for retail or other high-traffic uses. Since the office uses do not require high visibility, the proponents are strongly encouraged to include a significant retail component, preferably along the proximate to the street frontages. cc: Betty Nokes HAEconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN LANNINGTREAPP\EAC\Opus Southpointe.doclod ineresa K. Henson (206) 756-0370 P .02 NRC NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING P.O. Box 7208 Tacoma, WA, 98407 (253) 756-0370 August 8, 2000 Opus Northwest 915 - 118t Avenue, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY AND PAST WETLAND WORK ON THE SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF RENTON CITY HALL IN RENTON, WASHINGTON In September of 1999,Natural Resource Consulting completed a wetland delineation for the site located south of Renton City Hall. The wetland delineation report completed for Greenberg Farrow Architects in September 1999, is still a valid report, the observations and conclusions for the site have not changed. The September 1999,wetland delineation extended to the power lines on the large towers that run from Benson Road South to Talbot Road. The area south of the power lines was not included in the original report. Opus Northwest requested that NM': review the remainder of the property to determine if wetlands were present. The portions of the site reviewed in 1999, and in 2000 are identified on the attached map. Review of the remainder of the site on August 8, 2000, found that wetlands are not present on the remainder of the site. Wetlands are located adjacent to the southeast boarder of the site, as delineated by others, and included on the attached map. If you have any questions please call me at (253) 756-0370. Sincerely, NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Theresa R. 1-Tenon Natural Resource Ecologist Ino4o42.tri, H-1040-02 .-.u1.J-..., -v..., uc : Lir ineresa K. Henson (206) 756-0370 P .03 celiv / 1� R(2,4-1 W 1 :'1 ' 144•.I1 -•• \ \ , \ \ :',1 _ s, 111, ;' ram.► •` • s\ \ 'g vi 11 :40,1",:% • r._ ' • k -_•=_ \,., \'\• \ t .-:- p\A1\1 1 --L" T- Of4\-\*VC II ,• ..,•,,. ,, it ,,, rn• ._ - . \i I :::` •• V . . 4 • • / i " I • 14...••••• • \ ...14,:e . ..- _ (IA ; \ A • —‘1,i • ••. ..* ,4, • . ,... \*\_\_\4:14. .,. . l ' y- il\f l \i- T ��' a N i ' i" ::• ir lie.\H-R4Irv-T-0.111` fV4•• 10.7,ititatiaa:-. • ,., 2 \ . . "•-• \ \'k:, , ! .h A.V. It'l. • li r., 25/%1:5- --. • . ram; Aso 4 • • „ r .•. ---(1,7 ,T./ --..:.—,dar,„! . t . • , A ',4 1-1,7V4,41.P, ........ ,, _ : - __-- _"-.-- .`fir!= • ___)-_ 1- - �4 :. $ • _ ram" • I �; y�` . q' 5,ytr6 \ -.....". tadr . V ) •1•.. �. 4,. 0•{4-5. fi' \\ UAL 4 i¢Ad • \N''..• ' .''. ' • . . , • H-1041-01 WETLAND DELINEATION Renton Home Depot Renton, Washington September 1999 • Greenberg Farrow Architects, Inc. 15101 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Tustin, California 92780 NRCNATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Assessment,Management and Regulatory Permitting P.O.BOX 7208 TACOMA,WASHINGTON 98407 (253)756-0370 FAX: (253)756-0155 liiterefa (253) 756 370 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on an interpretation of information currently available to Natural Resource Consulting. This summary is for introductory purposes and should be used only with the full text of this report. This wetland delineation was based on the On-Site Determination Method described in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987). Based on the information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents wetland was not identified on the property. A concrete lined storm water pond and drainage channel (a Type 4 Water) were identified on the property. The concrete lined drainage channel is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The area up to the edge of the drainage channel is paved;therefore, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would not apply to this site. The ordinance indicates that, no tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty- five feet of the ordinary high water mark of a creek. 1 I H-1040-01 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope of Services 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 1 2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW 2 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map 2 2.2 City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map 2 2.3 Soils Information 2 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 2 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit 2 3.2 Topography 2 3.3 Fauna 2 3.4 Vegetation 3 3.5 Soils 3 3.6 Hydrology 3 4.0 REGULATION OF THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL 3 } ' 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 4 6.0 CLOSURE 4 REFERENCES 5 LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1 Vegetation Species Identified On the Site LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Map APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND FIELD SHEETS ii H-1040-01 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT RENTON HOME DEPOT PROJECT RENTON,WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Natural Resource Consulting has completed a wetland delineation for the Renton Home Depot Project located north of the power line easement with the large towers, south of Grady Way, east of Talbot Road(S.R. 515), and west of Benson Road South in Renton, Washington(Figure 1). We understand that an agreement to construct some parking under the power lines within the easement is proposed; therefore, the area under the power lines was also evaluated for this project, and is considered part of the site. Wetlands were not identified on or within 100 feet of the site. A concrete lined drainage channel is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The detailed result of our investigation on the Renton Home Depot Site are included in this report. This work was performed to assist in site planning related to development of the property. 1.1 Scope of Services The scope of work for this study was limited to the following tasks: • Review of federal, state and local regulations pertaining to the subject site. The review was used to classify the on-site drainage and identify potential buffers. • A visual assessment to observe existing site conditions. This was accomplished , using field procedures consistent with the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987). • A review of documents readily available, including local wetland inventory maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Maps, and soils information. 1.2 Site Location and Description The irregular-shaped parcel contains 10.72 acres of land and is located north of the power line easement with the large towers, south of Grady Way, east of Talbot Road (S.R. 515), and west of Benson Road South in Renton, Washington(Figure 1). Renton City Hall is located directly north of the site. The property is located in the NW 1/4 Section 20 and the SW 1/4 Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. The northern portion of the site contains gravel and paved lots. A building foundation is being removed from the northwest portion of the site. The eastern boundary of the site contains a sloping hill side covered in shrubs and maple trees. The southeast corner of the site contains the concrete lined storm water pond and concrete lined drainage. } ; 1 H-1040-01 2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW - 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map of the Renton, Washington Quadrangle, 1:24,000 scale, does not indicate inventoried wetlands on the property. 2.2 City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map A City of Renton Wetland Inventory Map shows that a wetland is located south of the site. The wetland is identified as W-31, and is a Palustrine scrub-shrub, emergent wetland approximately 1 acre is size. This wetland is greater than 100 feet south of Easement A(Figure 2). 2.3 Soils Information The Soils Survey for the King County Area, Washington indicates that the site is mapped as containing Urban Land. Urban Land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material. 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit • On August 31, 1999, a biologist with Natural Resource Consulting visited the subject site to evaluate site conditions. The entire site from the power line easement north was evaluated and wetlands were not identified. The nearest wetland is located greater than 100 feet south of Easement A. A concrete lined storm water pond and concrete lined drainage channel were identified in the southeast portion of the.site. The majority of the site contains gravel and paved areas and two buildings. The eastern portion of the site contains forested and shrub vegetation on the slope between Benson Road South and a cyclone fence. 3.2 Topography • Based on topographic data provided on the August 16, 1999, site plan topographic relief on the site ranges from approximately 20 feet along paved portion of the site to 52 feet in the eastern portion of the site along Benson Road South. 3.3 Fauna Songbirds and rabbits were observed on the site. Evidence of various animal species on the site was also noted, such as mice and vole trails. No plant or animal species, listed federally or by the state as threatened or endangered, were observed on the site. • j 2 H-1040-01 3.4 Vegetation Five representative data plots were established in the undeveloped portion of the site to document plant species and dominance of vegetation on the subject property(Figure 2). The vegetative species composition varied from a big leaf maple forest to blackberry thickets. Data forms detailing observations for vegetation are included in the Appendix. 3.5 Soils During the site reconnaissance, soil conditions, including color, texture, and relative moisture content, were observed and recorded at five data points on the undeveloped portion of the site. Soil types observed on the site ranged from gravelly sandy loam to silt loam. We understand that the site contains tailings from a coal mine that once used the site. 3.6 Hydrology Hydrologic conditions, including saturated soils, and indicators of wetland hydrology as defined by the 1987 Manual, were not observed on the site. Water enters the site via two culverts that run under S.R. 405 and Benson Road South. The culverts discharge into a concrete lined pond located on the eastern portion of the site. Water flows, year round, from the pond into a three- foot deep four-foot wide concrete lined channel. Water in the channel during the site visit was approximately three inches deep. South of the site the channel is blocked where a trash rack in the channel is blocked with debris. Water in this portion of the channel is up to two feet deep due : to the blockage. 4.0 REGULATION OF'1'HJ DRAINAGE CHANNEL The concrete lined storm water pond,and concrete lined drainage channel identified in the southeastern portion of the property is considered to be a tributary to Rolling Hills Creek. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WSDFW)would regulate the drainage channel as a Type 4 Water. WSDFW would regulate alterations or work within the channel. Normally, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would require that, no tree cutting or land clearing be permitted within twenty-five feet of the ordinary high water mark of a stream. Since the area up to the edge of the drainage channel is paved and no tree cutting or land clearing ("The act of removing or destroying trees or groundcover including grubbing of stumps and root mat from any undeveloped lot,partially developed lot, developed lot,public lands or public right-of-way.")is proposed, the City of Renton Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance code provision, Section 4-9-5:D would not apply to this site. At the present time there are no other regulations regarding stream setbacks within the City of Renton. The City of Renton is currently in the process of modifying their sensitive area ordinance and may include stream setbacks in the modified ordinance. 3 .H-1040-01 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(1987), vegetation, soils, and hydrologic conditions necessary for an area to be considered wetland were not found on the property. The nearest wetland to the site is greater than 100 feet south of Easement A. The concrete lined drainage channel located in the southeastern portion of the site is paved up to the edge of the channel and under current City of Renton regulations would not require a setback or buffer. WSDFW would regulate alterations or work within the channel, a Type 4 Water. 6.0 CLOSURE The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific application to this project. They have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are professional opinions based on an interpretation of information currently available to us and are made within the operation scope, budget, and schedule of this project. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In addition, changes in government codes, regulations, or laws may occur. Because of such changes, our observations and conclusions applicable to this site may need to be revised wholly or in part. NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Theresa R. Henson Natural Resource Ecologist H1040.01.RPT 4 H-1040-01 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C.Golet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FSW/OSB-79/31. Environmental Laboratory, 1987, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Munsell Soil Color Chart, 1994, Rev. ed.: Baltimore, Maryland, Kollmorgen Instruments Corporation. Reed, P.B., Jr., 1988, National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1994, Public Notice. 1993 Supplement to National Plant List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1981, National Wetland Inventory Map, Renton Quadrangle, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997, Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, Publication#96-94. 5 H-1040-01 • TABLE 1 VEGETATION SPECIES. IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE TREES Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Big Leaf Maple Acer macrophyllum Mountain Ash Sorbus scopulina Red Alder Alnus rubra SHRUBS Black Cottonwood(saplings) Populus balsamifera Himalayan Blackberry Rubus discolor Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Scott's Bloom Cytisus scoparius Canadian Thistle Circium arvense HERBS Bentgrass Agrostis sp. Orchard Grass Dactylis glomerata Reed Canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea Giant Horsetail Equisetum telmatia Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea White Clover Trifolium repens Note: This listing represents the major plant species identified. There may be other species present on or within the subject site that are not listed. ) H-1040-01 WI %.\.e .0% .. ��"4711 z g i 1 . ,0 ) ; 2ND 0 ,cr 4 .. A 3RD i I/ , rr air 1. 9,1 1Pigitt741 iii‘ A 14 7.y r I A alli..; I( .-1- co1, SITE rH GF,p'D wavk RENTON VILLAGE , J, i0.11/ --===-------------114" -AdilliM ii, 16 O 2 1Ti'H ' is 19TH „ET __ 21ST M i lee N Renton Home Depot Approximate Scale 1 inch to 4800 feet A Renton,Washington VICINITY MAP September 1999 H-1040-01 Note:Map adapted from The Thomas Guide, 1995. Natural Resource Consulting FIG. 1 A Martigesnou sseromeot, Regulatory Permitting 1 . l . . - •• 1 FNTES7ATE 405 • 1 GREENBERG FARROW ARCHITECTURE ~� ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING �_ spsa '\ . '.y`Y_+===.'.:- S� \`�. 15101 RED HILL AVE SURE 200 TUSTIN,U 92780 - z - r- VOICE 714/259.0500 FAX 714/2593480 = _ == LOCATION MAP • --,--,,.._.,,,,.......,-,..,..„,,,,,,..„.. ! JT 'am - e , a\ \ , BURNER AVE TALBOT RD. • • _. It, • ::...• • _ .- Y =>: \ PROJECT INFORMATION • • ,.� _ `" MA /ON - - SITE AREA o \ S � ''. . :it ..� y• \ THE HOME DEPOT 10.72 ACRES Ai. • • ? ..\, ~-` ,` • • TOTAL 10.72 ACRES /x S- =L�F ` TOTAL s }i _ N SITE 'COVERA GE: 8.1 X 76 AC—� O 2 6 12Z SF 9• fj l� i O Y�1 a: '•,. • BUIL DING• ~�•+1 �. w 4i' 6' O •\• ::i`:='._RO�� � \ NG AREA l• . \ THE H•o E OM� .� O T EPo 117 F S 064 S ' - _ hh J '�T`= a _ GARDEN CENTER J -1` '- •;.� a,...-. • • i EN7E 14,790 SF `ti �'::. • ...-:aar WWII=s. ,r.. \• ,�` `• 7 •i TOT ,: •y :\'b. o.n m....r im�a E :..�-r., - _ ��`:j::., , ='z�•` G - .. \ AL 131.854 SF • 'f. • b• ' - PAR\�.. KIN G C ouNrsu MA YJA M RY IA rt S6 • REQUIRED BY C RY \ \ THE HOM E D • � _ 527 SPACES \ \ ^? .4 :.\- ':' ta:�: :." �\t •I .. DEPOT O 4/1000 . Including GARDEN CENTER y` ` TOTA • L R• EOUIRED\ . 5- Z7 SPACES • $ PAR �. KING PROVIDED , i I tr �F t._ . .... . _ .• • N...,., F ~'r`1v HOAR V EDEP _ OT:s. \ l 1' \� ,_ x .f _-~-,� � - CUSTOM- - � ,x __ - �% ) _ ER 464 SPACES ,{ ` ijG - .�' OVERFLOW 101 SPACES - _ ,l"'•Py _ for •- 'T \•' .�.• • • • • TOTAL PROM.. \ • 1 -¢��, q¢ - ';•.r PROVIDED 565 SPACES ' • �' I- 4 `•� , ,0 F e -' \ RATIO PROVIDED: 4 9 1000 n '+ �' z' \ .2 / SPACES _ .. - \ P'-4` -• r ,R,4 a�S ,b r_p+gC. -1 a ... E\�j,\\t\`` -. FRONT FIELD PROVIDED: 419 SPACES • •i: - - �'� d,...' ,A,:\\. ,•A 6' ` .I, - ZONING CLASS/F/CA / N t \ \s. +'•.* .;��`�� � ! IH HEAVY INDUSTRIAL , DUSTING: \ •a• ✓� �� , ,O %j 1. I� '' PROPOSED: C-A COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL • ^�\�(75.) (�- s I. • SITE REVISION SUMMARY \\ `,\ `'11� _ \ .` �\ ��� \.� � - _ - ",. REVI E LAYOUT OF ENTRY DRIVE SNOW PARKING Al 1 \ - .. . _ _ .. . CENT PARCEL \� , ter `qa�Y, . ,• v z 1 P I �, , '1/4 .fir F` r_., \ .\ • r • \ < • _ > ;'v/a - .... :_. _ • r ''� PROJECT NOTE • S ' • - �. _ 8 . _ -"' '---� -•- -. "' 1,THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IS FOR PLANNING }1. , - _• PURPOSES ONLY: SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION SUCH - .- \ ; : r� "' .i�,,.•+ / - ... - --�_-�_ AS EXISTING CONDITIONS, ZONING, PARKING i _ \ v - I - _ �' - I - --- LANDSCAPE REOUIREMEMS MUST BE VERIFIED. '• '� ' :' '~ /�- - 7:----.,-- � •' " �"'•- —_ 2.ALL CURB CUTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHOWN ARE \� .�'; 'W (�9 r - "' - ' ® / — PROPOSED AND Ml1ST BE VERIFIED. \ 0I '�- , ,. , Q�O� � 4/ ' 3.THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON SURVEY GENERATED BY / �;• • BARGHAUSEN, FROM SHEET 6557TA02.DWG DATED • 02/15/99. • • - i Renton Home Depot DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD \ o-f� Renton,Washington DATE: 6/16/99 • \ / 5'�t SITESrrE DEV.COORDINgTOR M. OKUMA ' SITE MAP SH R.E.AUU?I�T SEATTLE I ` 5+g // • R.E'AGEN/71A NAME RENTON • a September 1999 H-1040-01 \,,`��THE HOME DEPOT • `-00 C �`1° RENTON, WA GRADY WAY&TALBOT ROAD f • : + Data Point Natural Resource Consulting FIG. 2 OFA PROJECT NUMBER a70eso.0a Assent,Management and Regulatory Permitting _ _ff 1 1 1 , • [I] nil 0 25 50 100 150 200 j • r \ • • • WA— • • APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND FIELD DATA FORMS r H-1040-01 • APPENDIX DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS Indicator Category Definitions OBL Obligate Wetland. Occurs almost always (estimated probability>99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW Facultative Wetland. Usually occurs in wetlands (estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally found in uplands. FAC Facultative. Equally likely to occur in wetlands or uplands (estimated probability 34-66%). FACU Facultative Upland. Usually occurs in uplands (estimated probability 67- 99%), but is occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1-33%). UPL Obligate Upland. Occurs in wetlands in other regions (as defined in the National List of Scientific Plant Names), but occurs almost always (estimated probability>99%) under natural conditions in uplands in the region specified. NI No Indicator. These species have not been given an indicator status. They are assumed to be upland. Source: National List of Plants That Occur In Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). 89 pp. • H-1040-01 Data Point: / of S DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ��nto�n Date: 8 —31-9q _ Project/Site: Applicant/Owner: Ho rrvz- Depot City: Re +or) Investigator: T f.H Job#: N — 10 y 0—o I County: • Have vegetation soi or hydrology been disturbed: Yes No State: Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes 4101 • (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Sonoma %Cover Indicator 1. Qvkb 5 a•sro o'r 5 l 50 c (t 1. 2. C t. s a.S Sco 1 .o. Si 1t 20 (.li'L. 2. 3. DILL}.l1;s 5lumer., H 10 PACs& 3. 4. Ac ros+'s.]s?. H 10 FACIA. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8• 8 ,---- _ 3 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAG). *-Dominant species. _ _0. 20 Cowardin Classification: /0 on — ) ; Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators N 4'1114.... Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage _Aerial Photograph —+. Inundated / Other . Saturated in Upper 12 Inches .% No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: N o " Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: l \ Data Point:. I of .5 SOILS Map Unit Name: IA.rict� Y1 Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? m No Profile Description; Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) Musell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Rhizosnheres.etc. 0 -2. 1o4 12va. s ; 13- loam a- II to 1R 312 C i-Guur..i1 Sci..r4 ry ufjGUt+- I Hydric Soil Indicators: N v . Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor ._ Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions - - Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes tell Hydric Soils Present? Yes ' Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes 40, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Remarks: 2-97/DATAFRM/TRH-ufi Data Point: 2 of 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: g e.ri ion Date: g-3 i -99 Applicant/Owner: .)crw b-e 9 at City: R.e rt ►-t Investigator: T R\+ Job#: 4 - Id 40-o k County: tc el State: wA Have vegetation,soils or hydrology been disturbed: ® -kV' Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes (If needed,explain on reverse.) -- _ _„ VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Sti tnn1 %Cover Indicator 1. kccc- Cal acrelehy11,,..,T Sa FAGu. 1. 2. Cor1hS tort1U.+L Sh 30 Fri r...0 2. 3. Rut.,...s d4`scoi. r 51, 50 Fri-c-u. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. - - 8. - i Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *Dominant species. -e' So . Cowardin Classification: A)O h — &t%o,n 4 Remarks: HYDROLOGY . _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators i J 0�� _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage . _Aerial Photograph Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ✓No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 dNi_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ; Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: "i 1 Data Point: 2 of 5 SOILS _ _._ __ Map Unit Name: '\ Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? 0200 No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) aundanarsDninig Ithizospheres. etc. 0-3 1oy2.3/2 s > I -- m 3- ►2 1 Y 2 313 rn e,i• Grzwe.11 Su.n� 1ocrn ►ai it-3P- c' t qS Hydric Soil Indicators: 160 Ai? • Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor — Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (go Remarks: • 2-97/DATA FRMITRH-trh } ) Data Point: 3 of 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: Rend-o,n Date: c'-31-77 Applicant/Owner: Ffo rne- A cpcft- City: lie ii I Investigator: T R H- Job#: i+-1 a `I r3-0 l . County: ( i 5__ State: tom,¢ Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed: Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes 'o _. (If needed,exelain on reverse.) - VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Ludic= Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Covet; Indicator 1. Aces-. Ma.crophylhcrt, T $O Feu 1. 2. 1Z 602w5 cl:srotot SJ 60 F4ctt 2. 3 3 . 4 4 5. 5. 6. 6. . 7. 7. i8- __ _ _ 8. __ S Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, - FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species. "a,o, Cowardin Classification: __ -No n- t ei-1c�ccl -•; ' Remarks: r • HYDROLOGY _. - _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators P v✓i-Q _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage . _Aerial Photograph Inundated 1 _Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches . o Recorded Data Available Water Marks • Water Lines • Sediment Deposits Field Observations: P 0 r-e---- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: F Data Point: 3 of 3 SOILS Map Unit Name: LA.t ‘D ex-1\ Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): - Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) [Ivlunsell Moist) aundarmenwpazt Rhizospheres.etc. 0_3 )0•t2 3/2 5� )�- /�Cm 3-la 1oyR 9/3rcku-e Hydric Soil Indicators: I.)v►U Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer • Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List _ Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes CND Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes Uvo i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes CAS Remarks: 2-97/DATA.FRMfrRH-th • Data Point: of.5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: Qt rci-rp n Date: 8--3 i-77 Applicant/Owner: 11-o&Az_ e a t City: Rc-Aloe) Investigator. t{ Job if: 14-l o`io-o t County: 1c State: 1,.44- , Have vegetation,�soi or hydrology been disturbed: lit 30 No Is the area a poteI Problem Area: Yes •• (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species 51=m %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1. Cyi-Cst&s Scoff*��� sh 30 UPI__ 1. ,.A ...r•erase. Sh 1 O Fi .c t - 2. 3. A.54-0 s s sp. 1- •a_O FfF[.Lt. 3. i 4. 4.4-.0 s n1 .*tfLi \4 30 P$ ck 4. { 5.f 4e'Klan 7e rr►a4,g 1I 10 FtcLJ 5. 6. d t�{�l�.an reptns 14 20 Fitc A. 6. 8. 8. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *-Dominant species_ f? Cowardin Classification: Nan - w'ef l o-1 i Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators a'AR._ _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage Aerial Photograph L Inundated _Other r. Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ,y No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: f J "A- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 1 • Data-Point: Lf of .j SOILS Map Unit Name: LA, 0.rk Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? () No Profile Description; Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, 1 finches) (Munsell Moist) (Mumsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast lUtiaospheres.etc.• o - 12 toyia 3J - 6-ra.ue.1t S ndsi ( -f-) Hydric Soil Indicators: 1•.) - Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking Probable Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes CO Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Remarks: 2-97/DATAFR.M/TRH4rh .. I • Data Point: 5 of 5 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Project/Site: R e ri1-vn Date: F- 31-71 Applicant/Owner: ftomQ De Pot- City: Ren7o • r) Investigator: TR I- Job if: Ff-1 a 40-a l County: C;r1a� Have vegetati• . soi or hydrology been disturbed: (a) No State: 1.41.4 Is the area a potential Problem Area: Yes l • (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stamm %Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum %Cover Indicator 1. Cy-hsws S[a �h 20 t.cPL 1, . 2. R.�t”..s Sl'1 8d F'1}G14. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC(except FAC-). *Dominant species. Cowardin Classification: /`10 - Lc)e410.11 j Remarks: _. _ ... .. .. - -- - - s HYDROLOGY • _ Recorded Data(Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators NO _Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage a _Aerial Photograph t Inundated / _Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches v No Recorded Data Available — Water Marks Water Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: /V D YtQ._ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Oxidized Root Channels in Upper Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 12 Inches Depth to Free Water in Pit: i (in.) Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: t... .. .. . - _. - simme ememmommoim { i , Data Point: 5 of 5 SOILS • Map Unit Name: ur ba Drainage Class: Field Observations Taxonomy(Subgroup): l Confirm Mapped Type? es No 11 profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle . Texture,Concretions, (Munsell Moist) AbundancelCnntrast Rbzospheres-etc. p- 10_ I U y 2 `f/3 -- J ra-trc.l li su.rt.c� loc.-wt ; i Hydric Soil Indicators: No _ Histosol _ Concretions Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking - ) • Probable Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List • Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION —_ - -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? . Yes Q3 Hydric Soils Present? Yes eel Is this Data Point Within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes f(r, Remarks: 2-97/DATA.FRM/TRH-trh **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0005052 Amount: 2, 500.00 09/12/00 12:17 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: OPUS #070463 Init: JEJ fl.Project #: LUA00-124 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: 915 GRADY WAY S Total Fees: 2,521.76 This Payment 2, 500.00 Total ALL Pmts: 2,500.00 Balance: 21.76 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 2, 000.00 000.345 .81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 t **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0005053 Amount: 21.76 09/12/00 12 :17 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: OPUS # 3034 Init: JEJ Project #: LUA00-124 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: 915 GRADY WAY S Total Fees: 2,521.76 This Payment 21.76 Total ALL Pmts: 2,521.76 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.05.519 .90 .42 .1 Postage 21.76 00 -- lz4(y) PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN Opus Southpointe Proposed Office Complex Renton, Washington Py s. GRus, Prepared) for: (,, 3. q,0Opus Nort_ hwest, L. .C. . z 915 118th Avenue S.E., Suite 300 "Ci - Bellevue, Washington 98005 90 28527 O �`S,S OQ►NsrEa� � I EXPIRES 1/?/TOlOi� September 9, 2000 Our Job No. 7725 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 2 2000• RECEIVED &HA(,S n/� F mQ' 1. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES n 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH, KENT,WA 98032 . (425)251-6222 . (425)251-8782 FAx w % �,u'� �i ww.barghausen.com C. <�' 'G cP4G' 't TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1 2.1 RESPONSE TO CORE REQUIREMENTS(KCSWDM) 1 2.2 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (KCSWDM) 3 2.3 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS 3 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 4 3.1 UPSTREAM ANALYSIS 4 3.2 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS 4 4.0 ON-SITE ANALYSIS 5 4.1 DETENTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5 4.2 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5 6.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 5 7.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 5 FIGURES Technical Information Report Worksheet Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Existing Conditions Map Figure 3 Preliminary Site Plan Figure 4 Preliminary Grading and Storm Drainage Plan Figure 5 APPENDIX Preliminary Calculations Appendix A 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project is located within the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian,King County. More specifically,the site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South in the City of Renton(Figure 2). South Grady Way provides approximately 750 feet of road frontage along the northwest side of the property. Talbot Road South provides approximately 500 feet of road frontage along the southwest of the property. The proposed project includes the construction of two 145,000-square-foot,four-story office buildings and a retail pad for approximately a 6,000 square foot restaurant. The two office buildings will be centrally located on the site,surrounded by appropriate parking,landscaping,and other appurtenances, including a new on-site stormwater collection and conveyance system. The restaurant will be placed near the northern most property corner adjacent to South Grady Way. The site is currently developed with unoccupied Puget Sound Energy buildings. All existing building structures,as well as other site improvements will be demolished and removed in conjunction with this project. The existing site does not provide on-site detention/retention of stormwater,nor are there any existing provisions for the treatment of runoff prior to its release to the downstream drainage course. • On-site runoff flows are divided into two separate basins. One basin drains to the north and combines with the underground drainage system within South Grady Way. The other basin drains to the south and combines with the Talbot Road South underground drainage system. Both the South Grady Way and Talbot Road South systems combine and flow through a culvert underneath Talbot Road South near the south corner of the project and then continues to the southwest. The proposed project will involve the design and construction of a new on-site stormwater system to control stormwater runoff in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. The proposed development,according to the current site layout(Figure 4),will only slightly increase the impervious surface area(compared to existing conditions)resulting in a nominal increase in the rate of stormwater runoff from the site. The increase of the 100 year runoff has been computed to be 0.13 cfs,which is far less than the allowable increase of 0.4 cfs per the King County Surface Water Design Manual (Core Requirement No.3). Therefore,on-site storm systems will not require a detention/retention facility. The drainage control system will consist of a collection/conveyance system and a biofiltration swale for the treatment of stormwater prior to its release from the site. 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY For the purpose of this preliminary analysis the preliminary stormwater requirements have been evaluated. This includes an evaluation of the Core and Special Requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual,as well as identify the preliminary comments regarding stormwater bought forth during the Pre-Application meeting. 2.1 RESPONSE TO CORE REQUIREMENTS(KCSWDM) Core Requirement No. 1: Discharge of the Natural Location: The drainage produced from the proposed project site must occur at the natural location. Page 1 7725.001 [JSG/jss] Response: The property drains to the public drainage system located in Talbot Road and South Grady Way. The South Grady Way system connects to the Talbot Road South system. Stormwater is then conveyed beneath Talbot Road South near the properties southwest property corner,where stormwater continues to the downstream drainage course. In essence,the site's natural point of discharge is the culvert crossing beneath Talbot Road South at the southwest property corner. The site's natural point of discharge will be maintained. All onsite runoff will be collected on- site and conveyed to the southwest corner of the property. Stormwater will leave the site at the southwest property corner into the public storm system near the culvert crossing beneath Talbot Road South. Therefore,the project is in compliance with this Core Requirement. Core Requirement No. 2: Off-site Analysis:All proposed projects must identify the upstream tributary drainage area and perform a downstream analysis, the level of analysis required depending on the problem identified or predicted. Response: There is no significant off-site source of tributary runoff from the adjoining properties. Refer to Section 3.0 for a discussion of the off-site tributary areas. Based on our evaluation of the runoff conditions on-site and the surrounding area, no evidence of runoff problems (flooding, erosion, conveyance)was encountered that would have an impact on the downstream drainage course. There are reported occurrences of downstream flooding. However, the site is only a small portion (area) of the overall drainage basin in which the flooding has occurred. Therefore, runoff from the site is not the cause of the downstream problems. The project will maintain the sites's runoff characteristics and any potential impacts to the downstream drainage system will be mitigated by providing a new on-site drainage control system according to current City of Renton standards and requirements. Since adverse downstream impacts will not result from the proposed project, a more involved analysis of the downstream is not necessary. Core Requirement No. 3: Proposed project must provide runoff control to limit the developed condition peak rate of runoff to the pre-development peak rate for a specific design storm event based on the proposed project site's existing runoff condition, and install biofiltration measure. Response:The 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual allows an increase of 0.40 cfs beyond current conditions before requiring a controlled release(retention/detention). The post- developed conditions will not exceed the allowable 0.4 cfs increase rate of runoff. Therefore, detention/retention would not be required. The project does proposes to provide biofiltration of all runoff from paved surfaces. Core Requirement No.4: Conveyance System:All new conveyance systems for a proposed project must be analyzed,designed,and constructed for existing tributary off-site runoff and developed on- site runoff from the proposed project. Response: All new pipe systems will be designed to convey the 25-year storm peak flow. An analysis will be performed to provide for an overflow route of the 100-year runoff event to prevent on-site flooding or erosion. Page 2 7725.001 [JSG/jss] Core Requirement No. 5: Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan:All engineering plans for the proposed project that propose to construct new, or modify existing drainage facilities,must include a plan to provide all measures for the control of erosion and sedimentation during construction and to permanently stabilize soils exposed during construction. Response:Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans will be provided for this project. The plan will be tailored to meet the requirements of this site and development criteria. The erosion control measures will include clearing limits,soil stabilization, sedimentation control,surface water controls and dust controls. A schedule for construction, maintenance, and final stabilization compliance will be included. 2.2 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (KCSWDM) Special Requirement No. 1: Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements Response: There are no known other area specific requirements for this project. Special Requirement No. 2: Floodplain,Floodway Delineations Response: The project is not situated within the 100-year floodplain. Special Requirement No. 3: Flood Proof Protection Facilities Response:No flood levies,revetments, or berm, are evident on the property. Therefore,this project is in compliance with this requirement. Special Requirement No. 4: Source Controls Response: This project is subject to a source control review. This project will provide water quality source controls applicable to the development. These features will be site-specific in accordance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Special Requirement No. 5: Oil Control Response: The proposed development is not considered as a high use site since the completed project will not generate more than 100 vehicles per 1,000 feet of gross building area, and/or involve the maintenance storage and use of the site by a fleet of 25 or more diesel vehicles, heavy trucks, buses, etc. Special treatment of stormwater runoff will not be necessary nor required. 2.3 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS According to the City of Renton memorandum from Arneta Henninger to Lesley Nishihira, dated August 1,2000,under the heading"Storm Drainage,"the preliminary conditions are as follows: • There is a drainage system from Renton Hill to the east,which crosses under Interstate 405 and Benson Road South and crosses a southerly portion of the site in a combined culvert/ditch system. Page 3 7725.001 [JSG/jss] • This system discharges into a developed pipe system in Talbot Road South. There are also developed pipe drainage systems in South Grady Way and Talbot Road South adjacent to the site. • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan shall include provisions, water quality treatment in compliance with the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). • Since there are downstream flooding problems,any increase in the release rate from this site may require detention as a SEPA mitigation condition,even if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.5 CFS increase. • The Surface Water SDC fees are$0.129(but not less than$385)per square foot or new impervious area. However, if there is no net increase in impervious surface on the site as part of the development proposal,then there will be no system development charge for surface water required for this project. 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS • To properly address on-site runoff conditions and to understand the suitability of proposed on-site storm system improvements,the upstream and downstream conditions were evaluated. The upstream tributary will not have an affect the proposed development and the proposed on-site storm system will mitigate the potential downstream impacts. 3.1 Upstream Analysis The site is essentially isolated from off-site runoff. Runoff from the north is intercepted with the South Grady Way drainage facilities,while drainage from the west is intercepted by the Talbot Road South drainage facilities. The topography on-site drains from the north to the south,therefore,there is no drainage contributing from the south of the property. Drainage from the east flows from Renton Hill and is collected within an 18-inch concrete pipe. The concrete pipe passes under Benson Road South and outlets to a concrete channel on site. Benson Road South drainage flows overland to the concrete channel. The concrete channel flows to the southwest along the eastern edge of the property,emptying into a 5-foot diameter culvert at the south corner of the property. Flow continues in the culvert passing under Talbot Road South to the west. 3.2 Downstream Analysis Under existing and proposed conditions the site drains to the five foot diameter culvert that crosses beneath Talbot Road South near the southwest property corner. The downstream is then comprised of a system of conveyance pipes taking stormwater eventually to the Green River. There are reported occurrences of off-site flooding problems downstream during extreme runoff conditions,within the overall drainage basin tributary to the problem areas. The site is a relatively small portion of overall drainage basin and is a very small contributor of runoff to the downstream. The runoff from the site has a nominal influence on the downstream conditions. The potential of any adverse impacts to the downstream as a result of the project would be mitigated on-site with proper Page 4 7725.001[JSG/jss] stormwater control measures in accordance with current requirements. Further impact analysis of the downstream system is not necessary. 4.0 ON-SITE ANALYSIS 4.1 Runoff-Quality Control Analysis and Detention Design The developed site conditions, according to the current site plan will result in slight increase of impervious surface to the pre-existing conditions. The resulting increase ofthe runoffrates from the site will be very slight(calculated to be 0.13 cfs)or comparable to the existing rates,and there will be no impact to the downstream drainage course. Therefore, according to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, detention will not be required if the release rate is less than the allowed 0.4 cfs increase. However,the applicant may self-elect to provide some on-site detention voluntarily to establish a controlled stormwater release into the proposed biofiltration swale. The infiltration of the building runoff may also be considered to further reduce runoff to the downstream course. 4.2 Water Quality Analysis and Biofiltration Design Biofiltration of stormwater from the pavement area will occur as treatment of on-site stormwater runoff,prior to its release to the downstream drainage course. As mentioned above,the applicant may voluntarily provide on-site detention to establish a controlled discharge through the bioswale. The site presently does not provide water quality treatment of runoff. Therefore,the water quality will be improved as a result of the project. 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN All of the proposed conveyance systems for the project will be analyzed and designed to accommodate overflow runoff produced by a 100-year/24-hour storm event generated within the associated tributary areas. 6.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans will be provided for this project. The plan will be tailored to meet the requirements of this site and development criteria. The erosion control measures will include clearing limits, soil stabilization, sedimentation control, surface water controls and dust controls. A schedule for construction,maintenance, and final stabilization compliance will be included. 7.0 PROJECT SUMMARY The proposed project will not adversely impact the downstream drainage course. Stormwater facilities will be designed in accordance with City of Renton standards and requirements to properly manage on-site stormwater runoff. Since the project will not increase the rate of runoff more than the allowable increase of 0.4 cfs,on-site retention/detention is not necessary. The new proposed on-site stormwater facilities will provide the proper treatment of runoffprior to its release to the downstream drainage course (See Figure 5,Preliminary Grading/Drainage Plan). Page 5 7725.001 [JSG/jss] King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET - S p_dr �:,a :1:�RROJECT.,OW;NER,:AN,D it�..=:,: :'a`r•�� °�:P.Rs� -,*,•: � _ ,-,. ...�, �::P„ �2#�. K,t OJ�CT'::LOyC�A�TIONtiAN.D.n y.:n./:. ti:�.,r. :X�. vl,-• �U:"f,i:,1"AS'fl".`A:::::tt(.i ::1i �ti�M,: .."+^�:* ..t'1<, �•�:,. �.l.d It.^i�.^�:!L;.,V i,!H.�p _ -,�J,..: 1. 't• •.ate- i••' •,'R .0 r.,.xx, f•P'ROJ ECT-, "N.G1�N'��F�. �i'::,: - ,�,_ .,�'�.: i�.I,� ,, :, ,. :n:,:,,,�„�, n'n ,� �.,,:.,n,,[.,._:�R.x..I.?-".'�'`i" ,,,� .!��p,1�t"., �i' <;nu.,�„'•:, t:is�� ,a 7:"nn;, ...,..4.:,.,,.,: .,. .. ,... .d.,.„I, :,, n+l S:,n!:::,,.:,e,:d:...,:.,.,:,_ .:..,:,,,p l,�'n+i.h,,•I;," :4;d1'i•n',',rI::IIhm J9.i!„ <"rt,,:xl, nL,,, 'fll!,�,!ul;,,a:is„„u ';.i,,.! ..Y,., Project Owner Opus Northwest, L.L.C. Project Name Address 915- 118th Avenue S.E.,Suite 300 Opus Southpointe Bellevue,Washington 98005 Location: SEC-South Grady Way and Phone (425)453-4100 Talbot Road South Project Engineer Jav S. Grubb, P.E. Township 23 North Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc_ Range 5 East Address/Phone (425)251-6222 Section' 19 Pa01 E MI TYPE OF:PER 1='� �: t'>`�,>x 'Part 4r..�'OTHER`•REVIEVJ%• `FANb�F •R ,,, .: :. ,L. :q •:r. u...,r::.,,: :,, ';! fi'^,'I;c!i, :;e. .,. .n'•;„r, ,p,.; Id ❑ Subdivision HPA ❑ DFW HPA ❑ Shoreline ❑ Short Subdivision Management ❑ Grading CICOE 404 ❑ Rockery • Commercial CIDOE Dam Safety ElStructural Vaults ❑ Other ❑ FEMA Floodplain ❑ Other ❑ COE Wetlands Part�S�:�•SIT CO MUNITY:AND�D: ::'fay' '�... .._ E • ,M , . RAINAGE�BASIN�; .; Community Green River Drainage Basin Green River "r. 'Part"6'"SITE°` H'C "��� !.ARi4CTERl$TICS:== ❑ River ❑ Floodplain ❑ Stream ❑ Wetlands ❑ Critical Stream Reach ❑ Seeps/Springs ❑ Depressions/Swales ❑ High Groundwater Table ❑ Lake ❑ Groundwater Recharge ❑ Steep Slopes ❑ Other FIGURE 11 TIR WORKSHEET Page 6 7725.001 [JSG/jss] . ' • Part 7 SOILS I Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Urban 0 to3% Low CI Additional Sheets Attached Part 8 DEVELdPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT 0 Ch.4-Downstream Analysis Li CI Additional Sheets Attached Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS T" • ;::. MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION 0 Sedimentation Facilities • Stabilize Exposed Surface • Stabilized Construction Entrance • Remove and Restore Temporary ESC • Perimeter Runoff control Facilities CI Clearing and Grading Restrictions • Clean and Remove all Silt and Debris 0 Cover Practices • Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities • Construction Sequence CI Flag Limits of SAO and open space Other preservation areas 0 Other Page 7 7725.001 [JSG/jss] }- '�' - :1�i;T'. •.jiffs .M`. Part;1" uti I.i U Fi4CE:WATERrSYSTE r�:•. I':, III, 9;!'J'�i .,.1:9�i,. ,d>,yf•i �ii'in,.,.G,C� ...em.,.. ,..^.•ld., '..f.:r„'{=��?,,!:iGaiiii.e„ ■ Grass Lined ❑ Tank ❑ Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel ❑ Vault ❑ Depression SBUH ■ Pipe System Compensation/Mitigation ❑ Energy ❑ Flow Dispersal of Eliminated Site ❑ Open Channel Dissipater ❑ Waiver Storage ❑ Dry Pond ❑ Wetland ❑ Regional Not Applicable ❑ Wet Pond ❑ Stream Detention Brief Description of System Operation Underground Conveyance and Bioswale Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation Fai t U:CTIJ L'`RA ANALY_,.I, ..art ❑ Cast in Place Vault ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Access Easement ❑ Rockery>4'High ❑ Native Growth Protection Easement ❑ Structural on Steep Slope ❑ Tract ❑ Other ❑ Other -Part 1°3��SIGNATUR i. ;�.E OF;:PROFESSIONAL"E ' IN '"'I or a civil engineer under by supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Signed/Date Page 8 • 7725.001 [JSG/jss] { CV 'ni6oak P(Ne ; f. .. �'S ' ..'1a'::' ���� � ...... . :,�1:�i... Y;:.t.o- Qlii:`: .`:r�. m t i :� .c: Iq 1: • �q f' .. .'.y� •'ixa �:�,�•...,:. x.• sus .. ',,, li �,,i...:;i,.;.. , .:.r ,fir ;z`,.,` r • n : c •.: :,,• t: 1. ,.::emu.. .�.i4.. .. .. , .•}ma?i'=ill,,'':art y'•H Ran •''''n. : :61'. ... f.W` •'' :' •..,....V.' •+Sr ay , :.t�'� CO .'.�� .. :i�}.'" • ,':. i:�< • wrtJ1 • • ! U) g • .. % :ffi PT'': f �4 �. ::;'S.� • { ....r . . , • eri u Ave S. •_,+.',..A..' 'a� ..iy �...•$I1 s �� .gyp 1::4;..44":::`;'.77.1'.":7;i:i.:.:::-.•' . ' •. % i••••.Fta.(cio..A4sm.:' ''. ,[;....s. f . '3��..e`�yj r`" ��61j{,. • ,,,..:: Z•' t w•.�y,}(�� tt�; � S ,�� ems.• tr \,: .y • lOt NL' '.:A: ' ...s. +/7�. ': 'fly, ,f.,;.; b{: .;5'r':.•x'',:.'..Q¢(y i. '; ;2 �t gr.;;.,..:yj, t7 ;4 Y 'i" 17+; "b J!cfptrj. i,..;' a , . •• • , . — — o ,„„..wzro,“, tun CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ..........0, i s ....-40 EXHIBIT _ ...... BPI I .1.7 I i DATUM I PlaneIng/BuIldIng/Publle Works DeM.r ZimmermanGregg W.tra lik .71-11 RERNTLAdOm! EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 BY DATE APPR .”.... REVISION NO. ,., r:...:••••:.I:•••,;I:'\ \...\ \ 14V ,.4,.••„•, ' 1 ;7:,:.,a.; :,•:,..:.:,;•:,,•:':•1N ••'', \ I\ \.. \ ,/•••••"/„, „..,,, ':::.<:' .1..,:;:j 'ik .....• :Y;:•;;;.•1••:;.':•:...;*:•,:•.A, •I \ •-\ /lis ,..:., . ..z.•,,, ' 1\ ,•;....:::.::.;.....;.!..... ..,..,,;4, .:•\1 \.. - .4-3',••••.„ , , . ‘\ \ :,..... ,!:. . .:1•;... i ) x........;•:: •,........:..f.... , , - ::: , L i \ • \ ` ''''''.,! -- e ,r..1 ' •',$.0',/ ,/,--- k 1-.. •14 \ h':':''j' ; i:1,/ \''..;•;i:?.;.;';-;;" "?s ,..•• • ••'./...:," /-- 4 f..;;• •., ' sa, i:. .-..; •I ,,.41, 1,...,-,:1,....'::• '\\ \ , //' .;.,,,,,..ir" 4,//-- i\ \\ ,C.N\\ .,07tt';::'•....`. l' r . s' . •*11•.:: i 1 s '".•,•14T',' '' 4* •.:•.,...:,. :::'A:',. I ,,. ., ,••,_,\-- 1 , '......:',-;*-..:',3.--7:,- ----,/ N i \ G.]!.•::'''''' ‘ r ', X---3 ‘.•- s'1,14.1 '/'..,'..••••• •;'::: .;. "..-%:, !..2 \ .," I•••. \ • \\ \‘.. :•:f}:!:,..... ..•... a 0).-.....,1,.., ,.. A ..,::?,... \ \c///yt.:.;:"?. .,,,i-r:1• _... .--i-r$1. .. . , ::.I•:A:e,. .,:,,.:..r:.,‘ .:, .., . , :!..'.........1.• • gr. I i /•/ ‘,/..., . •„:::.:' \ z•• 1--\e's%".1'.; \ 7 '' ;..i.•'W'f-7:4014/°.,1'.AN„ , '''\ -'..-1'''''....7.'.. ' ' .? •.-'...;.,,..,g_fil i •• ,........• ..., % • ;e1.;•'•(X••••<'..P' .." ••• a,','t':4.I.,-.%, ...."...4..:.•4.4•••••I''''''I':.,.% \N' ° \\\\\\ •,.......:.'. ..\1' - .‘,'N P40— ..`:•< ;:!'4,'is',.. .... N.,, ' :2/' ,......,.,-,.,:-.,•-4,i:.;xiliY..,::z.:•' , ...-. .:-..3t-:7k-N't:, '.:;:...;:?.i.; -,.<:•.;:',. ...:.:,.. ., .;.:,. .:."-.... K A V. 1:;.• .,....• •• :. ••: .,'4•,...: iii ...,,-...,_..:,,,,,,,,,,.....i..,,,,..,..i.i.,..„),.....,z. \,,9*„..-.,'.../,....-:::.-,..\::: „.-7.K.••••‘5.-7.1..7......•. ';:si..%:;...,:• :..!•:(:z.:::.°;:,•1,..V.:••'. .•,:.i,:., I. ml \\\\* .N.... ,,:„.t.c.,:,:.,...,,,,. ...: :;.':;.4 li;.....'i:j 1 • 00 oy... \\:,,,,' '.....:'.:"\;•: y‘. .: , "4 .. ''''.....:•••••••:•:!!..;''.'... 3.47i;•"". • . ,‘..:••;: .%. ....••. ..,:" • :-...'.. 1r.'.:.•• : ::';: -,-'A''.•.\ .• 7/I r r s.-.:"...,...•., --\> 4* ,'.!t...:. :'•('•),.1.. :!;....,.*:,..z, .;:i.,...„,/,‘.. .x.:.;-'.'...i;f:i.,:•:;,:::::7.,...y:.,... ._-:): ...... .-.: :-...f.. : ,.,p":.K.F. . ..,,r.. .•<, fff , , / i 4.01 *.\:..: Ni..),.*\,.:...:.,‘• 4..- 'f. .7.i:.. ... i ' .•••":::;115:,• ;•s • . .s''..::;.••i:•:':•••i.:•'.!';'• '•••;z7 .''' •''''/.V.:: : • ::::?..k:14; .::::.;. ;:i::••••:•••••$. . .-iX, ..‘- \ / \I 1 •••••:•'.1:...k •.. W .:.„.. . 4...,...,...-• ..,; ...;,, ( :.., -''::•/.•,::1',.,,...1•••:-.:'.- • .:•::.'42....: ..: .:-...r.••f4:a::,.. \,, J'A /2 ,i:::'.V.::...''.'.. . \.Z... •''. \\,„:,.;.' ..- ..1: .. f...i.:•,..•••,%,- ' - •:•,:';', :.:'1•!'-::••••: :•'..3.:••';YZ..• ':•:,••:-/.'. ..1•< :.H. •,,I..!1.• '••/%'• .1:!:„A•••:,,, ...:c;::•: ..;.,'... :••- \••••• :. iv • ..'"!.:',::.:•':,•,'::., :f•::,-.: . ' \ ,s-...;•••.n.. • ••••,•ifd .,::•::•.:.-•• • 1 \''14 '4•'''• ,; . ‘ 47.. \\t •• ••,: •••:::•..1 \•'''.%••••4 1,„.•,..• • I r ..,<.,...:-,:.:,. .t.g•-s:::i...)::•,•:. . . :fe:• • :.:.:.. .j:.......,.:--'.. ,..4:-...:....,;. ..)!!„ ..,•;•.,0.11;./t A 0 . \,::,,i2... ) ? ,.,..:.;.,,,•:,;;.•;•,;:•••-•.,••••f:,/ r„,..,,,,::::„..., :„.. :. •1',, -'4?- ;;:- -..;:. ' -rii..1:, i i f.,, ." = \ :.:!:....• \..1%..,,i,..,,,,.... ( ,•,....,-••- i.:;;... .1.-••;•••r ,.;,:,:••••;.:.•...,.:::•.. . (,:::.:„. -:::.•:- '.‘ ....„,,,. ...1•10v0;•;..:/. :,...4( ,i. -4,Vppy ,':;":"... 1,.v,:';. ., • •:,,' .1 ,, •: ,.........:,...,.. ,v.........,,y....:• ‘. ., ,.•:.::•" ,..- •:,••••:,:••"::,•:-::.::. ,. ,,..,.. •,,,..i.,.... ",•• . ,*).,.., i4.k.---.....4 , y ) , ,)'1:-... ',•<,.SYs < ...):•.- i..••••••S :4.• ':`,/!'.• • ..; •••••:••e's,' ••••-0O3,„- '..„......• ............,••••,/ :•:.,..1„,;,..,,i ,,,,ia/ .1 c,,, ./ ",.. ,,\N \::..• ....? •.' .:.I . i") t,A ::;%•.•":-.•••:. .•,.:,.., .`•,•.1 .•• ,./.• ..1.:•:•: .• '•••••• ,• A':: k•••:, , • I ;,,,..:;, . - i //A• .,:.`....11 . ' ''. \- •!..!,. .4, •••:::••... ..:.:•.:::: . ....:::••,...1,---.:....:.::,..:"... .. ",..." il-,!.. -..:•:, .0- ,,-/ ,...• • zyty_. - 7 , \ .!: , ••:. :1,,,,,:.: ..4 -- ' \,) \ .,.!: .•ii;•..1 1, -. - . . , .,,,• 's:. * ` 4,\ tbk ,vg" .•:.,,': 4'„i'l ). ::•:.! /:i., .. .• '•.4.,,r;•••:,,n1•••,•::.:P., ...)•••• `:•:•,i, 4-:K2 ..•••••••••X••• '•!'/W::, ,: ..:*•:.9:.•a:1.:4• ,i:•• .:**!:"N „•,•... .,• ., •-••• ,•,...,... . 4. ,.::...<:••Ij ,\,_ ityrki___, , 4 ;..I) c• ,.... :../.•,, ,....,..s,.:,:••::::,, '...:•,::,•‘....;?,...:,. g 1 1 i li 4 . .... j ........4::.a...',':...<:,W,;/'•.0•:,,,a•••••••••?,'::i'l j ,.......... ....,.. • ..,A •:••:,..*•!::••:;"`..`::::i'''' •.:t"t••••24V-'•4",••.$••. 6..k•• ...-:q.9'74. 4.!::' . '.1,",:,•,..,..... (\I.A.i.g.r. \ 4 474e ,,;:i10- 4 's 4 : , . :k• ,,,,,,..p .,:":•,...E.::•:.,.:i .O.c'4.::•, A,..:,; •,;:•••,::.:,.„.!;„ •••:1: •:$.-.;•,,, 1...(,, :1!. •:'.:i:•••:•:. . .:‘•::-.e:: ::•• ' •••..N../, . -, \-------,,,,dia: -------L----------,-2-•60 ES' ''.k..:$•\,.....::•: ..! •-:,-------- - -------Z---z-Tif--. 111,i..,,,':M d 1 ,i.. ...j,:. •:: ..*:•J',',..,,'F':•• •,:sf. ''!"''''"' ••••:'•'•A'•'•'• '4.-,• ..., •:•;:•-• • • •-:.- A 6 ki . ....' ---: ..--- /•%•••••••:.;•••..., ..„•-•,.......„,:•,!...,:,,,•••::;::,.;:..•• ••::::::,.;•..,:.,•..7 . .,:,:J;:,,,,„ %. : %, •.:.:0,...,,:. . .---,..-,„---,..--,,,.„ tiI '''''' $ ..;. .,:.,:V"Et'!.:::':..)''''$....?.&..." i.j. '...1.:.:;,`,..,.....;.,::!.;?;:::',.,:...At•. ..:!0:. .. $...!:',..:;P:.,:i:E:, ::-.......:\ ) . ':: t'''': ..:!7?""'.. ..,./ 5:::;i'l.(./..'''...,4;.*:$•''.7 '';(*'..W...i"::,R.!i..,.,...*...:•: .".: ' .P.::: :.'. ,.: , :P/,?. N ,• .,••-r',:'..,.4":t..,,, r.-:._‘.::..:,.„•. •,s-...„,',:' \x ij.i:!,...:,.1.g:...t,'.':0'i.'.,':.:.;'.,.'':'.'.%:,....,:.....,'.f..;:.,:..,•......'..,.,...?..:':..,..1 i:..:,..,'x'n...!;.•::..•/f!:.,.''..-''.'..oi..7','1'..'.')•.',:',., •..,.''.1.,;.:1*•r.%..:;i':0;,',::•4...'4'.,:':,,.,.'.;.;".•!....'.1:T 4'I y./.)•i 1,:„.t i''•i;jI„.',•,'P",?'',f;.',•:;fft'4..'.'.,'.d:;,:'.,':•.,s.'T.i.,',.",;......v n,-.„.:•':...,::i,.:„..i:,:.:ii'7-,:..„f.:,:.•.,.,:„:,i,..!.,..!I-W>.1:,.•',.:.:':„.1• .,.„:1'z:!::.::R,':•:':;•.:..,:"0..'%.c::•:..:::i''.'',. '..,.s..';.•„.,,..L.,..:<`—:N':.,.i.r,..::„;:K:?',:....,'.\:;'?....,'..,.,7.'.'',:•e,J''„..:f.:„,,.:4:::•,i,-.:: ,.;:•„•\..:';:• .:.:.▪ „„1,▪ .,.‘.•.%.:.9•.,,:.,1'.• ,:.:::1..5-.':,..•'.i;..:.,:.„i4.,:,ti‘i..,,("!:•;:::•.:,.& .,‘A:„!.::.':;.•,4:•;,./,4,::•,..,,,:f.....:'.-,.''.;7Ay' i;"•..4:e:....:..,..:.7,,•.:;../'.V:,':v:',:,;4•::',!:..-.:•:-..f'./.t.,"*.:::.].,..,;.,':,i(,,i.,":,.'kj,,.....:.ikv.:,:•i.';,,.i.'-„'.>';,,7, I;...',.,.-f•:,...„k1.!..Y,',• .',..,''•.,...:•%,-.;..,:.•.",'.;• .:'.'-.,•.''N.,-'.,"-4,..,'‘-: ...\,,;".,.:,::..-:,.\.,:7.,;N:,.'...:,„:.'•::!'.:,.::.:..;.:T,:.v:....:4..„:4..z.1'!",:-""....,i' ,.-,4<.i/,...N""`,,.t...:..,...,''!••:i,.'.,":.-.:.,.,'.„::.',,,`,.,.-.!4.‘.„'•::.,;':„9\•il3 :s..2....•.;,i••* ,•..;.•..:.•i,.: .i.:,.:....r. ...i.,„..'..,•...?•.,.-.,,.•,,v:,.. .,:<.",,.,,N*7>,;„.•,\t••,A '•,,'\..,•',,,c,:''.,.'',:V•,,,L•,' ,i,.'...„„6„.:','1,.•, ::,::;‘/.:,,•. .R.4:.....: ;•.k,,..•..j<.„.....‹•,,.••.,.;„:.•':.c.:'-,•'•N,s'..i.,A"T!,..•,.,,:..,:,,;..,.......;:...,.x1O:I..,:,,k'„..:N.‘,,,I,,:1.,•-.:4'.?.-,:r.:.•.:,,:....,!..‘:b-.•0:•.,A0-.,•,..,:.l*8„i.•.s.\:.:r.':s,.:v,-...•V;qp',:';,.,:•;:.'\p,,',..,,.•:.:..:.:,,,,.".•::.,nw:1-;.-..,\V„.:::'.;•::,:,..:..;,..,•,:..::,!'i.',,4,,,.'.,:':q.•''.:•.,.,,'•.:.z'...;.•'::.1:,.•.':.•?.':::'$,:•:'.:.::.,:::;,:•,.:..,,%..::,:.::' • .:•..W••.••,:::•.:...,..,%:..::..s'i.:...::;,:....•,.:,:...,'•,:•..,.,.•,.'%.x,,::••,,,?:Q•,•.';..:.:.0 v,,::,:.:',.:.:'::..d„<;..:'••,.I.&..,:->,:r•:,:/,j,.•..4Lm.,.;.;m,.,:-`'i.:!•:,...:v;.;..'.vX,•;:..::4..:a.'•,,4'.•;.k.i-:.1.X:::.<.,:.A,••.:.m.7::;•,'':.:.;.,;:.,:R.:,::`;:,.•::,::,,:.:;,:.,.:....::;:4;,.;;‹::,....n:.,:,.:',;\..,,..;•.i'..:..,::p,').,':.'i..t:7:„.,„!:•R:•..,2.,.:.e•.,;.:.e.4.,..,.•,.:!.:1..:.:•..•:':li...,::.l..;4.:,t':r.g.•:.,i.;F..0....:0:%.'..,f.s..1..;,v41.t.•.".,.V::?\'.4.;•:.::.%Y.:•-'.,....:n,:A1..-'.:....;:::.:.4.I•c,•...e..%.'::..s..':.‘...;,,:, -'..x•.:4.',2;'.:.I-:,..:''..:':.'.'T-.:.'•:..*':',•..:.'-,?.:',c.,."......-..,:.,.i...,;.'...7.;1:,.'•...;..•.N:'.':.R,.:.::.,,.0,,:,..:::..;•;i,:.4,•:.s•.;.'-.,.,.:•.,.,,:..:•k,':1:,::,,.:•.fr,,a,.::7•;:<„.-•4:.I-.,..•,•A".,„:,.,..:,'::.:z.:...:..:i':...:.t..•-'••:%`..,•'„..:1.....••..":.•-..•.••.:'A1,.1':•.:,:'..:w.&.'„1':-4,:,:.-1.•..:,:,:"f::..„:':.,.,..,':.,.,:.„:..:'':.::3'.,s.:..,•:,.z,:••,..•-,1. * 0 / e N ) 1w 0 t , i ::•.....A:#.`,'...,'.:..-•.,.*....•.,-A...••4.,.••,i.:..'..,:•,f.:,*.•.::..:'•:,:..•.,P.i.„::•:,:,-„'?.:,!:,.:-:.,...•:.:. .‘::'.i:W.,:.•,..,'.:„ i:,f-Vf.•.;f\,:.fi., ,.,P;,fi;..,'•:,\..::•.•.:..:,A:1•1:•::,'-':, .i,fti\.v.l!r1:.••I:...N•,..•:l•:•.•.::•••)N:„•,1•:••r,':e'*:•:.•'II: '\,„•I)I NI•1?hI•IIiI,4 .„‘:'#'fi\4t\,4.',•l:2\k,i\,y iP,P'\s i lf kP''r'i*.ot i"e•1l(,•f,o(Pl,4•'fli i.Poi tpR'O.‘‘AfIi1•12i,,..A 114:4w•i0 1 14 /1 41, ‘ / • V 7i j ; ;yr „ # . . . ' ._f,,.'n!.,it',0.,.'\i1'.,,..,WtA1,,.i1)'1•l:k1,.,'T i.-,..kr k,-Vy:.,1- ._t q.o0,.i.1iA,r1,r;i,o•',‹',.•'I:.:• .;1.:..,.:.• ..;.:•'•.- ::'.•.^' •Z o1:u, 0., •:, ‘..,..,„,,,....:•„:, . .„.„:„,..„„..":.. .....,....,_,r,..„,...,„:„..„.„....;,„....•.,•,......1 lis ,,,;;;‘)fie. ..,; ,'F'' .. ,_,A•0"" ,..5' • •• ..-......:',,,,':'• . .....• i.',..„;,,-‹ .'4, , 'A: \V • ..;;;;,"1....7.1. .fer..., .....)f....`:',.a.,&:,._ • I ‘:::::': NIX \ \O\ \\ i .... ‘40 ..:" ,-;.z.: i : .::'k.••:::-. .•••':•:.;.:::Igi,• ...„,6sk,rag.4........"-:-.4 •,,,,..,..,,:.,,.,:,:,:,,i,,N.,„ 7,:;,....:.:.....,,. . „kl,:.:..7.,?;_:. ,,,4:,•;:.. ..- •f••;4.;_,,,,,:0;;•*,f ,,„,..x.V W:••••'N \1\ L.i; ... #•... .1 •• :,.., .,,i.W.;;IV,%I::::...:;ba•13::;'..0 . ..,. k.:7.T.:T.Cs," :::IN'S>:,',.:,;:::.?.'i.. t.:4 ..,;''T‘‘: ..:DI:r•4•'...±•:•'• H:,,q7;:::'' ..''.''.::;•'•:•.:,..: :''''''.,f:i!.•.'',.,.,\\ \ \\ A •,, ••,•• ,::: .4 i : ..:•,•\:..\\ .:i.,... • ,:;4•:::::•..,.,..:•,....:,:,.;:.,:••••••z,..,:g< ..,.,J, -.,\t.;.N-i...:•,,,•••,:•,..:Ac:::::.,i:t.......:t.• E%-;..•?...' ..1. ?7,?. 'XV s' .. „,,..,' '';',,".. ..• •.• •..1.:2.ymit •.:,;. :.'1. N, \ \ \ / ';'' ''''''•4'•: .,% 4E4' •:• '..I.:•.-. r'r'... ..;.;1:V.i.4,;.,'.,. '..l'At !!:1;i:'..:;*%...'.;:. ..•114.?...A0:',,,Yi i..4.:... •':..bi.•..--:-'''' ••1':' :,,,,<.'. .••'•••%•". ..4.:%••• .. --.7'1 .•"••••• - 1 1 f ,...•' •••:;•••• ••' •••:- lirtip . : .?::,• ,.• .•Y:H.4.iii.:..•': ' • .,i•,..4::i•.•.....ff'; .,,.. . ,,:,l•..,V;i:'4.•: .,.....A.ki,,,,' , ,• .....: .VT .,,, :N: .:...,. ,,,,45]!..P',:•:::?:?.;*•'://:•:'.'.... '.4),e.i PT '. .:,. ''..4. ..-1;• ..V.;!..',"1..,: e 4'', '410..-- '..,.:•..f.:;:,'/:•.ig09. ' 4-...:,.:-.., '.••• )."• %,,.. . • -I,. , • ..,:;•: ,•:•r...: , ':-.:•• ,,•...,,,,,:• :•,...::••$;•:q: •..,.:.::.•- . ::,..i..:;.e,••• `,:•7'..w.•r•;\ ,.'•-•• --•••• .:..P.;',...• :5;i1',. -V,..41 % .. . . /''.:. '1.3 -. '"*"" ii :"‘:,• .,..•'. ' '.mf.: , ....'.:.:, .• ‘....'"''..ffiglii:"..i :: .;:. -..?. ..-.:,:: '.j!,,'),,.. .s* :,,,?:,. ,.., ..,4.ii.1. •:i „,,,‘,.,,,,, —;,...(,1•:!- .......:. ::•::,:.••;•. ••., •• ••,, ••, ...:.• • .• .•:•••:.:,.:.::,,,,,,,,,, .g.',.. ,-.,,:o1.$,•o.,--.....;.,F .......::•..:.7.::-.... ,... --7V..,,,,,...0-:. . •••,..;•,,o.*•,;•E• •,‘„',1"...,r , ',, ;-•:,:.,.,•,•, .,.,•:„>, c.„,„...‘,...• :.,...i.:•:::•.•.: ..:,, ..4...• *,,,,),,,,or.p.,..... . .::::e04 % ,.,..., .,... ...;......,...,,,,:. :_,...„..,..--:.!..4,./..:•.•;,,,A, ..." ;..,..:,,..;:is..ssi.,::•:,,..,),:•>,,,,..:.::::7......---.:.:...7......4.0,1,-;:m.:;:,,:‘,..;,/, 6:•.,...,...;,:i:::;,;‘,;% tip .1:'.4f.;. . ,:<..,'• •4114:d.0 ,,:..'4.:. ..:''):''''''N4?•.•'... ...'..4isie.<" A '4';'.0N.W,!,',;..'•••'1.•: 1,- ..„14• ,:r.. .;;:a.f.:;,:.Z.,:-..,:<•A',,, ,-....;,,,--•••••• •.:-t.,`...,.L.;•;AV.It •.:•:-./;<" . \ •.,,44iiiiiih.„,_":''1.i;./ ..,...11 jacf-k.'....44: ;„ '''••Li§. .it..!:.•.<:::.•:)...:';' ...,.,,.... .: /. .,. ., /. •4f..,..0*../;) .•,v."-V:.,,..,: /'.'•..:`'•'($...' '''',X. '.'' '. .:4..'':' • ''''.14111k:':x..• ''1.1pkiZ:''".::...4::P. ..: . N,b,. . ......:.•' ' .'. • e:'...'.: •/::‹.;,..;:%M. .., I','f;"*:;:::: 7`:• !:Sk..:::'W.3N,V.FX,<Z,,I;??4 :.; 4. 4.i.z,.., ,11. ...,.4..., .. . ., 4, . \.. :,,,,,, :,• „,,..r.,„F --)•---v....‘...N,;:,,- .,.i(,'. ',.-- .....,,,.....?;::;,),g,,' ,,,,. ..!..4mo<5 ...i.v:w ...,,,,n4.....,",:v ptit if..]. ..-.:,-lot A„ okf. -:- , ,,,iy,4 11... :..,..-', ..:.'l '„.•' \ 4:i'.• -':••• :••&3':" .•'• 1 :; ••)e(f'.:',.r.,•-;'`.•;..R•Mi •„;',•!• •••••-:VW•••'.•'•':.'''' .''.:•: :':•••:,.%:.?,....:::.;:.; Atte;iz;....i.:• • ,-4,.. ..:,. ,...-X.e.,,,,.. . ..k..i,. ....,..: :•,..:,:.:z ,.,::•,-.A .. ...,;;..;4.... I,:;,.. i.j,.;;;:''i,...!.::....'-"• -:;,)•;,.../,,.:.: ',.:•.;,??..,;(0".` -.1....A.`,:iP i+tireks • .<' •'''-;"';''1/4'.-." ' :.;0. • < . r ..:J:::.' ,ii:;:',‘ '.0....'.1.•::''. ......':13:i1:1•'-e,.::'..c .,%. ' ,,,,:t•7•''' ,:::0K• . / ; t:,.t. 4 .#1;„•:;::,4:•"*. ,,46:1" '•':;'•.'41&47.1/41140..„.?‘;'•'. ,,`I'llWiV..!'"':' '.• '7 • se:•••....,:::: " ;'•:•.1.':4.7.'•0414`;,L.:V:;;.. ..•••••••'a'' ....':`.' • ..'''(../7' • ii/ ii/ / • . '!.f?,•:•.11'?1;•••''.:....!:...„,_ .'''''''::'.4: ' ;i:,..s• :I•:4-r.''.!:-..- 7.774k4k-,:i ...4*. ci..41 A::.•;....„ ...., • ".".",'; ',•:,,: :... .', i.? ..:,:!..',31.•::*'.':..,::R../Y i ii//8//8/ / ' k:1;,:!:. :''.4..::';'!'".:',,...-„_' ..,3 ... ....:, .;-;".'...1 :'•;:.:z;,:i:' ,'S%'Nrjtiapi.. *ak 4fir;10,4*; .'"..: ' .•... • . ,..g.y• . :i..;' ;,..,;.-i:Ji:f.ce.. „.:".z.,• -•' ...2.. ,,,,• •; .:. .).,...; :4 a....,%..;yes•-••,..'4..e',..-:.,4t,./7 I/(74‘( 1\(( ; 'iF '.: '':'siP : i'.`'..• ..;-":"Th'e.......:L' i.z. .::::./' -;:.4!...:•.••••:••':f.-.:4,,..,::.4,":;::.'/„..;. ,Ait,',411:,.;... • ,,;Ae"'. ;•;. ,;:•:,,.,,,,,;.:..4•„:.:;.:(,•:4111.7•C'''...:•f•.•'. .....,'Y:::"...,%:X. ilel•.:: . -' s'-. ...%.••:...•• 1%..,,.`";,.: '-". --,, ,...`•:;", .;.%••.•....:. ' .;; .........;4•;', .,;:4':*:: • , '74,•••••=11!Irct'i:!.7N,':••.%:r::.:0,--..:' , P::, ...',:,':;4, ,".•r•.:.4:V1:' •:.?;": ',*'''i c ! :.i:4:0,!..;::.'I‘....:"'" ''''''''. ..:.:•;•;.*:;•:.: " •.f.:::::J:l...:'.-:f''. ..,' •••,••';. 4$40,A..2.;:., ..,•••••,. ...ktr,,,A•itt,17:: •-,•"..]1„;:). '':.?:!•:;'..76.7,,••:.,!.," \ y•-• ....:.,2..-4 ....• v••••••:.&;•• ' 1 •• oi.\ ••• ••••11--;:-...,;',,"•::' il li / V \\\ :%,Yi:':. ' '',!.:*::',::.aI. .'''''''''••••;-• „.:Lc•:':::41‘...,4:, •••,•'",•."?.:Y'•'•:.4.:-:' ,••;':','• 4.'"". -4•4.-:-Ii-40;..e,. . ""-•... ottik .a,:•%.: ••. •- ...:.. ';'". ..>4'.t:•'.`:..';,:,,.;Th• ,,,,..%,7V1: A 4:V'•:>.•.-./ ,..„.. „ ... i :':,;:r.'....:&,;':l 4;4,,:,..<."-i;;.,..;. )4i, `''''.$, !-:;A:;,:. :,;,.'•s,90 -"k., . ..r/01-*:.:V„7* 1 L ..,001-\, ;.,:,.A..)•,. ..; •.:::!...„,,,::,!:<4.....:...k,..„r••,,,,......• „.:r•••'',.;:.'" h.;;:b ,%,..•:'•;,p.../ 1; -,, I \\ ! / ,..‹........v.„:„.7:;:: :.:.,,,,..,".„.•,.;i-•••••,,,,,. . , .\\:".•-..... „ 1, ," #4$, -Cr N i t "''''',":..,* :`: '4:•. •P. s''., '.., ''. ' ''S'r • is (-- \ I ,• i Ct / //' C. 1A..iY • ,\4S ' ---..1 ''''''•• ••z':, ,'•:. . . 1x.% ‘N.6:•:•'''''N 1.. 4."------- / Ir ().--;- .;,•-s,.- ,...,N, c-,7 .---"o.... / \s's% , - - \ • % ''''' / tibk ',:•": '...'. ,?,'.;..• , ,, '-;...„. :- t:.,•:,''.•': .'Ax. N\ \ / !.3'° •‘,, ,.„, ,;;.. k:::::::... ... •• .., .....,\ 1) ) '''.,'..`' -•'-'.,.;,..1. ' 1'01 0.,,iz.. 2 ',"::;:,•-• • , "!*, •'.2. : • \ // iir I i I . — '1-.'iS:z.ii....:4.:.::: ',;••• *: ,.%:,?,' " / // / 4,..*:\ z:•.:•'•,,.V.:t:: ..... \ \ \ t F-17) II I iiii• M - ,,..; A ' \'\.':-.' .(4,',S.,\\ •• ----- \• ':':...;.:',,,.....'t .... .; \ -‘ // i ) \So jii 1 I "I! •." s r4, S' ',•:„.. %:',.:,.:::.•fcl:. f'1„.,.. '''' • \ V.,,''%--....'''',',„':' .a., N14 ' %I M 0 og #i.,?N. aik:r; .t.,...:i•;. ::.?:*:‘%. \\\\ .'•••:::. .....,'.70:.-:.:,,••"4- •t4.' It V4' 9 t•e'e,' ,.3* e, '•:,N;%:::'.1 -,s2:2V.:%.'.,, ''- -'"- „..• . - . .,N 0 • ,.-__ .:.•,......,,.., , ,:„A: •, v. WHOM 11 3] - ' •A•.,,,,..A• • ..„!, TULE: Tie •_. e RufetANG Ii 1 il III Jr Ake / PLAN c z FOR: PREUM. 01-I °HAL/ OPUS SOUTHPOINTE C 0 q. . 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH OPUS NORTHWEST, I-LC a z ar Aiii, t KENT, WA 98032 915 118TH AVE SE,WOO S.W.GRADY WAY _ FENTON,WASHINGTON 0 .dia--- --. (442520)2525111722282 FAX x 0 ,.... . -. BELLEVUE, WA 98005 (425) 453-4400 -67rific,- ,,,..-, CML ENGINEERING,WO PLANNING. (No E,Golt• SURVEYING, DPARONMENIAL SINACES C.E.JOB NO. 7725 - FI'Fuca: TOFF.7i/O(/7M/7SMlIO P•7d1IS PLOT SCALE • PIPER SPACE: In STA: 400 NO:771 CO. OM nJM1m: .••. _ nit., p _ 5° ' °""""'°°'''' CITY OF >e RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON P ems. .. I Mr�T.� I I DATUM ar>® Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. g. NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR "^"� GreggQ'• ` Zimmerman P.E., Administrator PRELIMINARY SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN • p /401000;t- 47 o mu :: 2 II i t 15 I \ �. /I 'b ` "✓; \ s%7'-- •f" tZ1 ka s"\ j ' ../ e \ / \ , . ✓ . / i ITIU',i /1 i Ai .. it. i ... i„2 --,-;•-•::-.,—•/.. . N v,SR`tstk4,, — \.:\ `\\\z [ — g Q l rr'S; •i-.f.yns."'- '` ‘,\'1 1• a' u rt .p ; ip tk 1 1 Y \ Tip\ s s4(', , A, • • .R.• I • i'I. f j 1 m a �`, \ 'I,l r /l it '! 111 !1 II r I \"r 'I e m 9 • �` r i ,Il�A4 J 4• \ �`+'` o S i\\ H \'`` !' 1\ It 1 • �� i l // 131,r1: 1 j IIlir ``'S \��y raop v o5�0060 �I �T{, xi _ r f/ r'1'f"Y .4 rA ) ' Tkl. °�N N m p,,----11.� , I (W d 'zz•'2 r �'1 r 'yyy,�[I J r( rIlYY.•mny nc�icr �.JIw x oFprrE-- 1,-,'n, p/ f/ \ m C ` -s v ' ► J: 141104 \1 [ •_•0 if1/,• Itip ..- i •..,,,,•w•ii, lc ts VI 41 y e p r : : I! IJiI,hI ItR n �'� J ' !I[i1 ;ILO / qb -''�`! l� �� u1u�> .00� -f°'� � j rl 1�' .. 24' n - `/ `\ � "� / '1 - .1rFj Lo goo I MIN. gym, 11�I :.. _r _T 1r="'t 17 v ' V''O / '`) - P. \\\` ,:.*` 4.',•IW!.! .. • :u„ %,,, )i.. }2,•. °g JJ / r > z o~'z f g • • �11 - \\✓ `:^ \ • .. .fit do [ii Ir ;16.n gr 1 Argl.L.4.,.., eilia.., /4,..4,,*) ' \ me , • \ 7 o if� +ii+i♦:+ii♦il ♦i++�♦ P CO 1�� `'My �'+ I A DJ m° =. 1 z 1 1/1) .4: rr ,� Irgle•OPI... o®_ 'Q , ` r el:. t L • S� Z i \ 1Q / ANL, �g Ax va6 •♦A�Ar•\���'`i JJ •c��f raD 1 A z xFz ar ►♦�•♦�i\ 1 @u. �9 s A" Jo � � �y r i0,V. 1l64. Il 1 �l �R 1 I '11�m af'n m � voiox rox / s1\ RA8..• '\ ►i•-• a. I r 7''O D m� O O C' O• G�'l I, 'N //' `\ 09 jIt.,„.♦++••/, •• .1- I' 1 ! ( I•`M ♦�• Off• r r r r 1 du i I f ir.i t ,.-ic ... t.,,8 2 r it- ,,, g1_,, si) ..# /,1 : I. r o' g ��0s2s: \ g41 / - PI ' •1 1 K 14 i;' ' �g� ‘ 1 3:1 a \\\ ; ,\\v _� illy 'e ` \ i 13 ''- 4 Acir ii g '` ‘ ;'s-g.o FYI -►:i+++i` ' `� • /i Iir•440.�%• \ \� �I r�` i O ‘, ilia g ' j mad /� g' ♦+�++iN ��'L y oil a -ko'7 ` rr vOlt ' ,:.1\ \\\ r, — ��6,. ++:•. Aid d y. `\ J Lr IiJ "�► `\ 1114114V i r j \/ r •. +. • I ' s \ ►'• i Q �yf J `':it \;, -� `�/ ell;; ►i , 4 • , z 4, .....• kk,... ' :- \\ \\' , ,4 " ' . - 11._ 4 •••• ... .s - ' NV- \\ \'V'I' r o p / , 0 i,., , "Viz' .4104.;...........„,,.... ........\\........j. \ *;:' '', • , - 1: ., , . o ,' • :' ...,.----e- -4i ---- P*' N 1C\•\ 1 . VI It •,' s g / Lti,,11/1 •.,, ti,,... 1•11pooltr...„,11 :.-...;,... . a- li. . 1 \\46-11 i .A •,' \'trill N. .,\ 4......,,,.; :::E, •••-- c• _____-4 ., e • :i% .., 0, \ /II �.,.,.N,%•.• �y i .0 �i+�+ +�+���1 N i J? V 4 IIl1;'tl t ll1 ...„..;:,4,,,.< .\,,\ • :...07.ji,.....,,:. 4.,..,111,:tPiniMa m I 1647 qlk. p rr_: rille fib. '1 :44 \ • I r: it%s4•f♦++f • 1;��'r I }11 y l igil J fb •t" f!'f! ri ° t r/(f•4. ( /" ` /y \ ' tr�� r4rr ;® - - • 1\\ � �\ / m 411 1`it� ilp I a `t-, � ` '�,�. ` A I Fm -. \`\;, \\. ±\�, t•\� � -• /' C \ / , I� � :` _ N 4P4 = i :4. 1\ k ,y. n / .. �� ♦ k t� Pp - --- MATCHLINE �. /f ♦r ♦ ,� `Ill 1 lt \ N •41eatz‘A . \`' \,,, \ •'1 N• ''. ./ '''''' .: !?* 4! .. -,7 EIPL;:' K. (\.('I ,ii, ,..V.- sR cw • 1 iA-\., 1 , , ,,, , ‘, ,� 1 1F 1i7 V.% ‘ �.�r �►Ali I J I I f r 71,(I D `, y `•,\ \ A. \1 _ 1 1 1 `m^'• �, Y I I J JJ ! (((1! =�A ST,��f,7A \ ✓\\\ Y.�';t` - gel. ` o-,; ' •\ C\ /�: I9 2 -t%• , 7y' I { j j1 r rr /!/(`j(, i >a N \� !``\\�'\� I� mF` ♦ / ,j' � lj `1 �l 1J r'' (�f' I v mZ R o n >' /: \\`\ ��y w,Ai\♦ J `\ '\` J\� r'r 11l F I I I I I a i b Ms9f \sue /2 \y \�'\ N \` // \p r 1 \\rVJI ( j i• I I ,I d 0-TT — d�0 NO /�� •� \ y`\\ \`, / "'.1'�' -- - --- _ it ``{{ I.... I�:I I 7�3 I F I I A $ ¶37 `. \ `\ \ \ \ \ •al 'AMA HLIN t . A 11.—•.�iYIi(I 1. ii` m i t t C FOR: TITLE E z �GH40,s, 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH PREUMINARY FIGURE 4 �` KENT, WA 98032 OPUS NORTHWEST, LLC ` E IV � N O U (425)251-8222 AVE s OPUS SOUTHPOINTE 33 s 1 (425)251-8782 FAX �� 11 BELLEVUE,WA 98005 S.W. GRADY WAY A co • s°DTI • �Q�' CML ENGINEERING.LAND PUNNING, RENTON, WASHINGTON WG ENGM� SURVEYING. ELMRONYENTAL SERV/CES (425)453-4400 B.C.E.JOB NO. 7725 • • 25 -" z���-�� ._.` PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE_ PLAN _—; — C _ —— ___ s hray '�`--- ---J -; i i '� ��� / ✓_ �-- - -a`- ,.,. -fir _ __. i✓✓ �` '� / // ��/ _� __ _— \, EXISTING EDGE // -� \ r__ _ , i�, ✓i`_�J-�\ of�B' wN /✓ / =� —_ AAoy OF PAVEM// •. I \ ... =✓ ."'° si ice-���`tr �fM1ISNRBkj/ i\J/�— �� '�V � _ -.h- !_�.�'� � />-� _� �_ ..� �_ fi-��� //• i ice/ yC__�_ •-•�";`S -`�.((V EAST.SLOPE TO � '„t••�_�b.... �..�7-TI (` �r '� P TO t �'�.`\��_�-�//��—l _ f�\\\`// _ '_/ice\ j} / \ Q It- 1...., N\ REMAJN UNDISTURBEr• Y f �^ �- -Alt(�- .1 —A`�•f ST.SL+ ,� ti�—_1/ /� _ \\\ �� \ �j /' o Z - �� �;� l�:1I� a11)/// TM,_44 �_�J�- .\ � /� l , o ff W I to- g ,X --� ...` ; -, ///1//i _37 t 4• � � -\r D Nor�p % ; _.. \ 1 E I j 8 Z -_--;:•" �' \` e \ o + // // % . Z '-,-.1.. r�.41; �ti �__BEmo Y// 1� �:rr ��'`• :,�-• I O N C9 y // iJi- e><1 /, rt -- t •i v�-�� .1 1:14:;-1; ��•... � lla Z \___ �... ... -- -\� \ - .. 1-r C :1. - 4 - sots \ .. \ �1/�\ -.`--= 0 1 _` ,�/.' -./ ) ' f i 3 a! f ♦ 1 1 1 } I i iI 7�:...,+�... �I / �:/ :%gyp 1 r�- /I... f 11 \.r 1 r r r ! \� �e�'�� . . ��...� * 1 •/ l y r J 1 ! ! f , r l .��� O U' " .1, , //y 4 .�_ii ��� /��. I �yw�Sy •�► 11 . j ) p`�C r-� C•f } f ` so r 1 , J i i 81 ' • t, .0MH1 r i r i r• ) \ "� \ �1.. -77. \\_//y^��`\�\� �ram"1 / '.• Jl� 1 r� %r r dpQs! i F ! F P 1 d r i 1 r\1 \ r / t� y J 1 r r i \ z ////� �`�/ \ ���r--1'\�. // i r aa• RIM=�S.O t j 1 f )�l ! + - J ill/ ! f�'`' 1 r r r ! \ 1• 7 , ra. / ! 7 , r r 1 ) , r ) f 1 , J _ ` r i i 1 r , fs � r i j r 7 ! \ r 1 r , i x LLJ R' f� \�/^\ ���-�r� �0—fr./�� I r ♦ !I. r ! ! \ty ,-I--, rl ri r ` r : ' \\\� r iI r i ! ) �r r �./'/ /j� r`�- \ �� \�: � ! ! ' 1 \l 1 -1_ ri r ! \ r7 �t , a \ ` 1 y _ . J r r , r , r 1 t �-`1r D -� \ STORM`M , 1'ro • / r. ♦ - TW 39 \— �— . ,� Le t 1 ) 1 1 ) ! f \� . -r i ) r t , r 7 \ I Q / f i , FW=36 ��' r^f f� r 1 r 1 \ r !r 1 rD r , I i it t r 1 r \ 1-� I- / // / 4.: i ) r i r r r a /.^j� �'♦ ) 1 1 j f \ r i r r r { t A t \ f AN. -.. �r►o r r r t f W 7f . "� / \\ r: ' ! 1 1 -'' TIE 1 s' 1:: "'�� -1.r ' f i i ! + , s. \ i i i r ' •'r r 1 �f FLOW RESTRICrtOR ' \ \ / ,,�. K t r r ! r t •..!'..J.. ! \,7 , �'-r'^L•.)_ r r 1 1 1 i ! \ i .,. �' 11- (( \ � �/� ' ! ! ! i`1 , •�rSDCBf ! f ! ! ��%'v�i!`►��~�� ` \. 1 i ' 1 f r , ! i, r `•� 1 , ? , • \ -i-•T f r f , j , t t ..�� . \ �yG� 'l \ / ----MET �i r ! f i i �...t: i ! , - 1 r j 1 ! r . 7 f r , i f- r 1 1 i r 1 (�///� \ ,�'V, / ) ! ! i 1 RI =33.0 Ski 1 1 , i\ �� �yF ? r ! • 1 ' t r 1 + \ ��,,t\ 1 ! ! j ��1-f. 1 t i .+a\ ' ` �\� /✓ )+ ? ! ' M ' 'l i/�r s,%" .� I. ; , !r '"' ! r 1 ` \ r i ? ! J t r�' •\ -'-\� .o Jr"" 17'r r ' ; 1 ` • r i f 1 4 A) ! i ; ' "f� 1 1•r �-4 IT ! : ` 1 , 1 ` ! i r ry 1 1 , \ -.:: .\�\�\\ . ....s„..<,L y-n� r r i f 1 , 1 r i i 1 r •!•y r ' J ; ' r r r r r r \'. r + / //o ! f �! "•L r1, - `7. r I ) ' ! 1 r r 1 ! ! + �\ i ! ).+ y, •/ "i' �� i t -+ a 1 r ) f / 's��',/ ( 1`�:��♦ Q 1 1 r r X 1 / F \\ i ! '�' y/L \ � �.���� 1 r r Hn. r ! i i r ) b ,\..... f /"1 w / \ l�`` `/- I , ' l i r f 1 trialf 1 rJ. — • M , ,._.� ! f•4 i f'1.1 1 �0:�1 j4•:•j f `r ' ? ,,l 1(\r r r • , .-.,,• yy Z Z s: .,, l —1 TYPE 1 CB ? • 1 , t i /� ,•4 J r,��- r 1 r�Y i 1���:4. i v t r 1 .\r 1 i 0 o f �.`...� � \\\\ '—L RIM=}3.0„ . 1 I 1 ! 1 9 \ \., r r 1 i r% BUILDING A .,,, ^ ` \ ' j X‘1 IN Lam• ; f ,, ;\ •\ 'e•�' -�/ . ›-' `-' - '''�' \\ '" -' �.-1 r -4-1-r. .av•• ' 4 FLOORS 0.36,30D GSF / '� \1 1 L r l- I 1- r f S •F-. nl,i \'>('� \ \l� r 1 t ! ° ! ' r 145,200 GSF C /AIL./Viy \ i • , , 1' '1"p 1 . i ! \\ .. „'� ' % „z' E"r Wr� R a . \ 1 ' r , i f f , ' r 1 , i \ V' \ \ - �r�r l 1 �: \`' V p • !J,_, • \ I i 1 1 .• l .t 1 1 r..I F.F. 36.0 J i `• '>,t ! D, f '� Q c° \rn `� r r ? t i t i f r r X + r i 4 ..... T, ,>J \_ _ \ �� �• / / -' Oi rn't-i-- Ir r , ! 1. /7V0, i- �, E '�• ,/ \\ �� , r i 1f x� y,,))A\�A.•y.. _ ZZZZr �E \ \ C�\ ,r ) 1 `V'\ 1 ! i .: t ? ,ri-�11-v�'v r 'ffJ y°�• r'? 7 ti�t��i� i tkP •� •/J�� ��`�1 � ... Ili 1 r , r ,• ' /' 1 ; ' t 11 l 1 1 - - y,- E . 'IL.; ' 1 r , f f r 1 . , -it • �� ` *, e•. / r o \�., .,1 ) .i ! i"i ' ' r r�i. �� i !"?' ! \\� \ i 1`f�. r-' ,�" h ..' a �':1 1 a 10 ?�� 1 —\�:-`+-i- r J ) r ►�����• I:oil. , r r r , I�' I•r 37 j d p .i Q \t ! r ��:%i�i�i�i i��'v... ��i1 j -r l rt�j,•\`rtr. D" Jr" ,>' �. y� 6 .:S� 1, r ? r i r r ti����i`\ �i����i�♦ �������� 1 1 ! ? !-( rs''c. O t• r Ia,.. • ;;* .( -- e ,Y• ! 1 i ) } ! ! t r ! \�i�i�♦\ ��i��i���i� ���������� 11 L) 1.• \ �,. Z p N4- , / '1° I :_3> ,, ,�11 r i r i •1 1 + ♦���ie. ��.�i �*i�i� :��j�r' 1 } r \/ �, �- s..,�i ..i. '��B 1 1 �{ G .., .Re 1.'rt r 1 11 i 1w V.* �1 y^ 1 YE---++\ Vi . i'..3 i���� s r - ,,i,� '"�` r1r \! i t4 / \ I ^s X D 0 4 // / g g �, I Y „�, H /1r\r ,TV-I-r ! I r j i 1 i r la vi r 1 i f 1 A I \ ./.',. al 4 •`\ f I RIM.- 2 ' 1 11 1 1- ir•..1. ! r i C:- - • 1 r 1 t ! . \ ��• _ \ 7 7 jf / / O _ p / �\ . C W^ r�, 7 '• - / /// E%.OPEN CONCRETE i. \\ �\ 1 '.r•I r`] '1's• , 'E 1 CB ° 1 I ^^� ���///•\ ,� / SDMH``•1 \\J / / DRAINAGE CHANNEL g \ �.� /: l _. w j` j R.=33.5 /J�1�\r�r/,'^ 0:I,1 ~-! _ �� .� / / , 1. \\ I `11114i j ` ! i •° 1 i% _ TYPE 1 CB ��(� /BU�LVRW�I \c\/ // : \ \/ ) / EC.S o � rrt / I _4 FLOORS 36,33iD0 -Y Lf�� \ /r:17 � / \\ \ CULVERT 1 ki .. 1 ` ° .r r r f • y 145,200 F r _=\ 1 pri ! \ 1ILJS , -_ .� `\�\^� = `I / ftt \�• ~ •• ! ,_� "; �1 s. / g I R ��_ _� iI i _ _ L \ : _ -� SING _ '� i:%%i��• ' ! 1 1 `/{ ;` r �-�,:� ( zI `� � � � a 4 fi,000 csF ' -' ' -• ,.. F.F. 35.5 - �, . ' .����! i����.. ! ! r ! r 1 l r r 600'tF'- /' x r• ' / 1 f r r _T1PE 2 I.����i�'j���1 r r 1 ; 1 ! r 69R i�;' — if 'P""`? O / A U � / W ! ' DMH1 I��i�.i���4/� ' 1 d..I ! j ) f� �-•1�_,� \Zz/ �T u••! rr1 ' ! •y�5!•• 11 1 r � ��.y�� � � .�. �� �O N OND V• ._ -_ �'� r i r 1 ,1 1 I III / 4/ � T�?``/ /, R r�/ �'` � al rn ran ago gg _ _r Ti !r i '1 7 !r,r f 7 4--,_� r .� // 'oU �sWA EAR I � ,�•/ '• \�\ n 3 N N �e 7\ �� -- .... - -• -- _=_ '-\tea =1 -- %2 1 ;/f J i 1./'!f I t �• T ,� S.C,sG to -A 9"'s. Z/ -- . ` `�`� rm. PROPOSED I (.............H:y J A.0 _ ,lar��s ../ / i / POINTOFQ ,y z ._/-;/ LEGEND• �e" '- .. : � ,. ``' DISCHARGE I = -9� '�' WE%IST,STORM DRAIN MANHOLE !?l35DMH - � �� ` EIIe, 6b !IAiN/.% EXIST.STORM DRAIN ���+ ••��� � \` a iS6\q. IV v r�`1�• � �N - 7 / / /OVAL EY' 9 GpN p EXIST.CATCH BASIN DCB Si a -_ 1 s EXIST.GROUND CONTOUR - - - _ , I EXPIRES OI-07-01 Ili CITY -!1ta EXIST.GROUND SPOT ELEVATION o EARTHWORK - \ `Lg� �• OEPARTME OF PUBLIC WORKS 10 'F} PROPOSED STORM DRAIN - _ b �' r� PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR -_,M�— (RAW VOLUMES) � __ ` i t "' �'r/ PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION r,351) CUT VOLUME 15.000 CY `� " Z Bm <� �v � PROPOSED SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION FILL VOLUME 10,000 CY ��• \ - 0 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL GT�T �� OAT@ 7I�/� rLE Ml 7 4 NOTE: EXCAVATED MATERIAL DEEMED USABLE WILL ty PROPOSED TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN '�+•� BE UTILIZED FOR SITE FILLS. REMAINING MATERIAL �' ' will. 3 BE HAULED TO AN APPROVED DUMP SITE l ecuE 1'.30' Fs-D BoaK � - EW PROPOSED TYPE 2 STORM DRAIN MH •---�- Z _� HD. Rc19a11 Br APPR DATE ® MEL-TM or PuwC IMO SLffT °F� File:P:\edskproj\7725\preEminaly\7725Dam.d.0 Dote/Time:09/09/2000 09:10 Scale: 1.50 chuck%refs: 27725PB.Z7725PS Z7725PT.Z7725PU APPENDIX A . \ 3.2.14T- A 1 , ti:E1T FIGURE 3.2.1.D 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS .,' •+o K ..nur t �•' - -—- -— — • O COUNTY f \• •tw cu . 7N COUNTY t '- : • - • ~�� t y • .. z:k,. - Ii.4... am 9 i ;, 4 1. \Mj \ . p' •€dy' k + oak Ni 1 orti' _'l • •�% s.* tt : 4' !ittf:•rrt' • rI M x : x'x .4fit y a ;•''-. . 6''' . v1 M.it�r \ !J101 •4 -- . . - .`r..:s' •` & i .\ e - ...,{ _"—fi•• . . 4°' .%4 t. xo is-.plat; '1\ : \ 1". ‘`,,, ir Silb- ' ‘11‘.44-t ik z'V r: 4,:. j: • y� av xQ. ....#.. • a4.: .4e'r.'.+ gV.,: •,...,'.'. : Y'mkt. . i15 I '�.r 1e irAs. •,_•. . it c'S'h•ffisig•f, 1,;• ' ,'. •.• ii . F,,, tifz4 t f#1..:,.414:01PJ WI i .i.:...-- -I, '. ' -. ' . ,..--.giro- — \pis• f r.• :' ' :: I i A., \ ,„ 41 :1.7 i _LI-- E. O N C DUN_TY PIE C!"COVTY I WESTERN o� 0, elS � : b 6.5 KING COUNTY o ,r. .,. Ix- ,, :..v.; .:. 6.0 N N. ti 5.5 100-Year 24-Hour °`� �:h `�� . Precipitation �' h '� _ ' in Inches Miles �' �O -1.„} . by 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 - 3-17 ec/ . 4- • ••SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS f t &s _-— FIGURE 3.2.1.A 2-YEAR 24-HOUR LSOPLUVIALS ` � i -� -�- SNOHOMISH COUNT ti.:":".4.fi. .w@.•am }..,. ,' ....1 .t :,.@D v,1,4 �- KING COUNTY • 4.-. _"+:�• •erg+ i • • • Z I` Tn.f i t'. .... --•-� i wawa qa N.' ..,.. , 1.7,, coN. , i :. :. , • . r • N 2.1 '7, ' 4\ AI,: • .......,0,, . Or. r: $1. Npr."-'—'',.:-.- • f" a: = ss\-°;i! • ,yam .. . ,---s--f »i w L'1 (V 2 . ' ter+. • • w , .. : S -,.• 'Y 0 ',, : it ►says% `@-E' ti• •1 , ' y,qt 1 .......,. _ / I. `1: is ..,� - *.'' / 'i `,'S , +''' -! try, '`x�'..3 .`. .. . A 40. yy��� NN•. S:.Z.'y.:1'!r '. S'.9 y '" i'5 Imo. 4 •try.. .. .. •^. ,^ Al .:,, a;.;G' �§? `?ice.,< •- s Agi, tl:' ''' -- f -:‘7t .3'-*.. 1\1..1k• :. _ ; Ji'I:.i L:.:'.•� ' i'#.K`Z0./'.},. .k!.r:q�••.Ark 1' l..i i q4...0 s''''..-. ^.iia'..:.;::%.i.,...,.'it .,..'..::":;,.."„.:1,3) ! II— ' .411111111.1.4" 4..:101":. . on di r;,' 1111i It•x -- 4' i • :II::'1. cf^I am .iv ti ® Z c, "Y `V../._o® -•=w-t.:• KING COVNTY.`f d a. CO PIERCE COUNTY f N .1 WESTERN. KING COUNTY z�, -- E N _� 3.5 2-Year 24-Hour• ti Precipitation N y ni _� —� �f3_ in Inches ""�'� ~�'�L}� 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 3-14 9/7/00 1 :50 :58 pm Shareware Release page 1 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE WATER QUALITY CALCULATION BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A NAME: 2YR,WATER QUALITY SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 11 . 14 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 94 Acres 9.20 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 . 38 min 10 .38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 3 . 66 cfs VOL: 1 .43 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min PX_A C.t c \L\ qe.5 3 \ (.7 k • 9/7/00 BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Q' Calculations using Mannings formula 9moo Biofiltration Design -Opus Southpoint 'Q' n Area R S P BOTTOM DEPTH SIDE SIDE VELOCITY WIDTH SLOPE SLOPE (ft/s) A* 3.66 0.2 7.45 0.3147 0.02 23.69 21.6 0.33 3 3 0.490965 B* 3.66 0.2 5.11 0.3082 0.02 16.59 14.5 0.33 3 3 0.716004 C* 8.08 0.0300 3.97 0.2461 0.01 16.14 14.5 0.26 3 3 2.03383 Biofiltration & conveyance performance -area of effective biofiltration given equal swale length width given I.f. bottom depth sideslope(s) sideslope area bottom area total area travel time(minutes) A* 200 21.6 0.29 3 348 4320 4668 6.789 B* 295 14.5 0.33 3 584.1 4277.5 4861.6 6.867 C* 295 14.5 0.26 3 460.2 4277.5 4737.7 2.417 A*actual required biofiltration size-given; KCSWDM sec.4.6.4-2; n=0.2 dense grass; Q=2 YEAR 24 hr storm, SBUH developed conditions entire site, Qd=3.66 cfs reference . B*selected biofiltration width and slope,function, as designed for 2 yr., 24hr storm event;s=2.0%, L=295 If,W= 14.5FT C*selected biofiltration width (averaged)and slope, actual function for 100yr., SBUH developed conditions entire site, Qd=8.08 cfs;VELOCITY LESS THAN 5 FPS ok per KC 1998 SWDM. biol.xls • OPUS - SOUTHPOINT CONCEPTUAL STORM DESIGN Size Biofiltration Swale - using City and King Co. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Flow 3.66 cfs -2yr 24hr storm without detention facilities slope (s) 2.00% (bottom slope for for biofiltration design) depth (y) 0.33 ft. Mannings n 0.2 Sides (z) 3 (3 to 1 side slope preferred) Actual Length 295 ft. (100ft. Min.) length available with preliminary plan is 295 feet Required bottom width (b) calculation Q = (1.49/n) x A x R2/3x, (mannings equation) A = (b+zy)y R = A/(b+2yj1+z2) a trail and error solution of_b = 21.59 feet, for a desired length of 200 feet. check Q = 3.660 .cfs, OK same as given Velocity= 0.491 fps <1.5 OK Residence Time = 6.8 mins. 7.451 Find bottom width required if actual length is 295 ft. (Minimum length is 50 feet.) For equal residence time: Trial and error solution, required b = 14.32 feet Velocity= 0.72 fps <1.5 OK Residence Time = 6.8 mins. OK Filename 7725bioswale.xls Tab BIOSWALE 9/7/00 2:09 PM 9/8/00 10 : 6 :21 am Shareware Release page 1 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE PREDEV/POST DEV RUNOFF CALCULATION BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: C NAME: 1100YR, CHECK FLOW W/BLG' S SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 12 .40 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 4 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 65 Acres 10 .75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 . 38 min 10 . 38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 9 .22 cfs VOL: 3 . 62 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D NAME: PRE DEV 100YR, CHECK FLOW SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 12 .40 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 4 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 94 Acres 10 .46 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 .38 min 10 .38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 9 . 09 cfs VOL: 3 . 57 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min �`� \47 7-\1/4:->c\ ��,�J 9/8/00 12 :5 :37 am Shareware Release page 1 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE PREDEV/POST DEV RUNOFF CALCULATION BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E NAME: 10YR, CHECK FLOW W/O BLG' S SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA - 11 . 14 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 94 Acres 9 .20 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 . 38 min 10 . 38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 5 . 63 cfs VOL: 2 .21 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: F NAME: PRE DEV 10YR, CHECK FLOW SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 12 .40 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 94 Acres 10 .46 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 .38 min 10 . 38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 6. 35 cfs VOL: 2 .49 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: G NAME: PRE DEV 2YR, CHECK FLOW SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 12 .40 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 94 Acres 10 .46 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 . 38 min 10 . 38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 4 . 15 cfs VOL: 1 . 62 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 9/8/00 12 : 12 :36 am Shareware Release page 1 OPUS SOUTHPOINTE PREDEV/POST DEV RUNOFF CALCULATION BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: H NAME: 2YR, CHECK FLOW W/BLG' S SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 12 . 40 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 65 Acres 10 . 75 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 77 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 10 .38 min 10 . 38 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110, p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1100 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 4 .25 cfs VOL: 1 . 65 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min SEE DRAWINGS) i f ' / . . . i . THE TRANSPO GROUP ,. -.-. ] TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALysis, for i . . Opus Southpointe: , . ) 1 I . • : . ! . I Prepared for: Opus Northwest LLC O'it.4I't I I I art 1 August 11, 2000 •i:S.::3 IL.c.;a Lz..5:".•Lit, . .1...!L I I 1 i i I 1 I 1 ' i 1 1 1 , I : 1 1 , 1 ‘I 1 . 1 1 i 1 i ' 1 I 1 I I ! \ ... ... .. ... .. . , .. -. — . .—. — ... . ._ • .. -. ... .. - . -. ... .. ... .. .. .. ... . - .. .. .. _ 1 1 \ . TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Opus Southpointe Prepared for: Opus Northwest LLC 915 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98005 l August 11, 2000 • Prepared by: • The Transpo Group, Inc. <T • 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, Washington 98034-7120 ( '425 821-3665 FAX: (425) 825-8434 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 • Page INTRODUCTION 1 Project Location and Description 1 Study Scope and Organization 1 EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS 4 Street Network 4 Traffic Volumes 6 Traffic Operations 6 Transit Service 10 PROJECT IMPACTS 11 Project Trip Generation 11 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 12 Traffic Volume Impact 13 • Traffic Operations Impact 13 Site Access Analysis 18 Frontage Improvements 21 Transit Impacts 21 MITIGATION MEASURES 22 Off-Site Improvements 22 Frontage Improvements 22 Traffic Impact Fees 22 APPENDIX A LOS Definitions and Intersection Worksheets APPENDIX B Trip Generation and Internal Capture Summary Worksheets APPENDIX C Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis at Talbot Rd/Southerly Access Driveway APPENDIX D Maximum Queue Length Calculations/Estimates APPENDIX E Auxiliary Lane Warrant Analyses at Site Access Driveways APPENDIX F Daily Trip Generation Estimates for Existing On-Site Uses ( TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) FIGURES 1. Site Vicinity 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. Existing Roadway Network Characteristics 5 4. Existing (2000) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7 5. 2001 Without-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 8 6. Project Trip Distribution 14 7. Site-Generated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 8. 2001 With-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 TABLES 1. Existing and Future Without-Project LOS—AM Peak Hour 9 2. Existing and Future Without-Project LOS—PM Peak Hour 9 3. Southpointe Trip Generation Estimates 12 4. Project Traffic Impacts at Study Intersections 13 5. Existing and Future Without- and With-Project LOS—AM Peak Hour 17 6. Existing and Future Without- and With-Project LOS—PM Peak Hour 17 7. 2001 With-Project Driveway LOS Summary 18 8. Vehicle Queuing Analysis 20 .... .1 __ a ,�i. .3 d ,li a _d Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed • • Southpointe office/retail development, located on the southeast corner of the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to identify potential transportation-related impacts associated with the proposed development and to identify measures to mitigate these impacts, if necessary. Project Location and Description The project site is located in the City of Renton, Washington; it is generally bounded on the east and south by Interstate-405, with a vegetated embankment to Benson Road S adjacent to the site on the east. Adjacent to the site on the north and east is Renton City Hall; office buildings are located across Talbot Road S to the west. The site vicinity is illustrated in Figure 1. The existing site contains two buildings totaling approximately 53,435 gross square feet (gsf) of light industrial use and one 29,975-gsf office building. These buildings were previously used by Puget Sound Energy (PSE) operations. All on-site operations have been suspended for about two years, and the site is currently used for storage and maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. The existing PSE buildings would be demolished as part of the proposed Southpointe project. The project is expected to be completed by 2001 and would include the construction of two office buildings totaling upwards of 291,000 gsf and a quality restaurant up to 10,000 gsf. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. Vehicular access to/from the site would be provided via three driveways, including one right-in/right-out and one full-turning movement driveway on Talbot Road S and one right-in/left-in/right-out driveway on S Grady Way. Study Scope and Organization The scope of the analysis was coordinated in advance with City of Renton staff. The study area includes both signalized and unsignalized intersections along the S Grady Way and Talbot Road S corridors. Overall, five off-site intersections were identified for evaluation. These include the intersections at which potential traffic impacts could occur, including: 1. Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way (signalized) 2. Talbot Road S/S Grady Way (signalized) 3. Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way (unsignalized) 4. Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way (signalized) 5. Talbot Road S/S Renton Village Place (signalized) Traffic conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours were evaluated at each study intersection to assess project impacts. The AM and PM peak hour conditions represent the time periods when surrounding street system traffic is at its highest, and thus, cumulative traffic conditions with project traffic would be greatest. M:•1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 PBge 1 I till L. I i I u i ctw • (N) .- ..-.,,,m. . ,. • c„, , . ..._ ' - nu-•.,\ .4, ,',44 c,..re c‘.'./ ,1".."4.4 • ”...,t,S 133,0 1"••••,<W::_$,,L=1;".,;,,,5, 1_,,,9_,,,L_1114,2,_',E '7 • - • .•" I-1 ' 1 kali_ '- ,,,rttf ' * ''''' . '- I r;4.114 '. .,;,..a * • (5',C•Ac ---1-----' ..4„.„,„I, I •,,,f,A, T . 1.V'*_.L '02_143IN 14;;PP ' l. 'pp ,,--110, 1',-. , gti LA)OKa , '," 4." ..6 :„._ , __ -,-.-1_, 5 „,?. .,1 , ,. ,_ •„,„4„1„.t.ccak, cc"zr. '•.„4„.._., •,:lb,,,A1/4:. i 7 ,N. k\i„,„..,,,, I._..11.§.1.11_11. i ri---,:-. s'•4 1., c:. : ,-. 4 1 5,I ki 4. , , ...r..:1,/ "..yz ,, .4./ bt:i , !.,4-14: "I i''''' ---..:27 S'.ili•C,../:/a -1)1.?1:11' s: i .1/.1 ':4 1.8'IM?"'''''4 m. j": ST t t:.,. *•*.q.'file;;;;:!;14: El. '4' ;;... Acu'l.....- • .. w0/?: 11 ''--i;.'1 .;//kW1--- - '-•11' 'R I's g • ri" '" kbudi ..F•:I.2.1.-T.- 4 I-ft'Ng/. . ,'..'•---..!, ;.F -. S . _ -.7,, l'i..).,1.44.,'S t :),,'. ,,,.x.•7.3.44;•, 11' . . lir ST S illi" '•arttrir'4' t-.' '.' - -,-,..J-• •.z-'W2;7-fi ,r ,•:,'4,0.2i,..;',. ,.:„.. ki•-i i --6 • •••-•..„..'.'..i.,J. - -..!op.. ,-...,) S3RD: '71. erliM, .--'44-• *., ;-. •'"k4. . 40; „5 :.' RE F,. 4. '''''4`!' -."' 7'.?.... : j''''•-•',:'i,-, ‘1.',:"\','':.:'''''.;',.-(0'.::' "', "-,,?LA.(i..7iffilk.-:•---7.7Z2:-.'k " •''.• 'ili •43.14.6TIGN--,.,:-SZ7':'.....:-..:'..; -,. ..- Av..4s..-,',..1:-.Teriowliv,..,,,, R.,,,,44-4r,,,itogrom.„„:,, 4,,,,,,,,-.5„,,,,,,:„.7..., 1 ,......,... . ,.,, .,...,..„,_,,_ , , , ...........,•„,,.„...„.,.., •,. . ,,..... .,,,„„. ,k,,,,,,,,,„,._„,,,,;,„„41.„,,,,r4,..,,,„\,, „...„,„„„..,,,,,...,.....:. ,,.....::.„2,.......: . ‘,. , ,.,-, A-1. kg,..,.-c.•,,90, 1 ,.:!.: ...7.1, ...,1 I.,-,-..-:„AtT'qsr.'4.•'-0,,...-k,::- .......1,- ..,.. ..*--2,,.4....,. , pt.: ' !Kg.;4.41 , ,g4twitawintorop,kk, .4,,.. :,,,,,,,,...ac.,......,- Qi..-:,,;,,.\'?°.:• •:..,tt. 4".131.e.tg„tit,„;4060Vtttie;r4141f?:.t . i'.!,,,,t174Itk '1.Atitt..: .-t-'tt.'10 .. •..!!)t..t ig raivivi4ttv.25,„,,Rov-1,K:c.::2„,..„ 4,,*,,,,,:-:.. ''''O,.2. ..., it4 y. ,,,,,,,,...g-,,,,..,- gatfa,s.,,-.:,.,&‘:',,,,,,..4,,:',,,,,,. ...„..ur . .....„,...:.....•,‘„, • .,." ci ' IA'1 I P:14,":1°P0J-KOON..??4".-i- 'v\*-°',-,,•'''',7•;'••'''''' r•• :.'•i"'' ...'.--'4, . — .4.,..ArghtliF="4,--';.."!,4t,t,,,•12;1°,!,,,,'4.7..", ,, ';ATZZ."'-•': ',..M•'-: , ;'P'• '',.. •1•J'.•,q.ev2.-4iNfliv.1'"40.•'.f..::',...,:',.....1,,,,- ,,,i,,,. .. ..,.1„_,...41,4, v.. „,,,-111.00,•21.A.••"-';v-,!..ID. l';',..''',.;,1 q4,.‘ :•1":::•iFi.;',: -".•'••#''...•.': :`•Xl":. :•4•1••••-:;P,. •...,..-'-',ax-ii-XV4p.,"44., . • '-gikr, , itt,i,:. ...k...,4'..LT- 1 • .-.4., :.T004:-.,,,. . ,..),.....,k......,..:,,,......,•.... -,,,, .,..an...r.. 1..7-.4 • •,.,• i, ..-..4,.':hi:-.'''',P1,1 TP#641,VIPPAFINV.:,,,,,,,, ':' A•" • .• 4, , ''.,'-g, .j.k.f..,'4,!.4'.' ilife .,,•:,...'''::"`;4.,:<::. ''. "'""r, .'',..t. , ,...,,,,,,,§4 .i ,ri.„ .,...,, .. ,..,„.•;,,,•.,•„,,-, •.•,,,,,,,,,,.4,4, . ticil,,,404 • . .,,,, ,,.,.,-,..+, • , ..,::„.• ••..,..•,•,,,..,..,,,,,,..., , t'e,"ft."?'' ',Kt.II''.4. 1',. '-&:•,:,....';'''XZ .-:-.,„.,.I1I ,.'\r-T,'i.i.r..:4/.,....\,Zt:s.4,,4'1,,*,;,4‘','',:.,•`‘::';i,,`i,'-,:5fr,,ii,i3-:;l,,-,i,,*,,-4.,,r4Ai,,.,,.,,ffl0k,°'(,,;1,.4.„,4,,i3.,..'\.',--.:.SaK;,':,k<4l.7k0k:4--:>'„W:l.,-.'''...:,,.-4''1,';':',i„:l...,.'%?;:,;'„',.:',..'•••.,,.',•,•'.'':r'•..,.i r•'..t.•.'\t':v"-?.„,.i.....:,",..t,4„,....:,•.:'..-4,i..•,-.'',,':.:.,,'..--.1..K.,.,..-.11..i..,•.••:P.."'I....:V:.';T'A..,"'-•,-,-:.„;••,.t.?,,i,.::7.,,-,.:ii'„."i4i.•_:,..,..„'4.--l.d,;,7t'..ff•,&I,:•-'wi',,r..i%`„1t7 34,,1,,-\,I,'1:'",,•„....4.'.'`',.,'.,.t,Q.t.,t•,,0,:O-i..f..„''e,--'.t'4n..a-..i.;.i.,:R.':.•;.'F:i';'si',l..';.-.::fr.:4g..'.,''::-?.,4,t',--;:".».;,:-..l.:'.1•:,...!.•-:'.;2.:.,:.,•:•.',,.'41.-'.'•7-'r•-',.:!....,..,..:3"4.-,.,.'„•t.,a.-;.;::.;•#-;.:-.•••4.:,a‘..,.A.,.:,'i..'';;,''?-6•::'.';.,••:,4..::.;.,,:.„;':,fr•.I1;,;''jI.,-.,..Z‘,.',•./:..;..tm,._..;,....,...,,,.4,e sI!,-..'g...x7.-,.g,,-•t•,4:,'.,',.l-a;:'.•.,;i..-‘:k.;,'',1•,E'iN:,;t•4,i,;,..0,.;,,4,Tl.;4.,. r.1 k•,1•••1I..'..;,K6:1.'.i•.-1 C'2.g..,..#:!76 3?'..!:0'.-...''t.,o4:•'_:,',.:^..•..•15•:f...,..:‘'....,_''•.",..:_..,'„..1.'.gw q-,.'.•f-G•y,'i.";'-Ot.,0,s!A..,X,e'r•IV•T.•Ii,•,.r•ia,i•..•:r'.x.'.6,,:..1.r.3,r•s•p...,„,....,•EF:S9.•,'3g'- .,...•.....6"\.1-@..„•.,.1-, •,-:+4-4,•§„:7..,,,:r..,,'p,. ....y. .,t,.1 111.,•..';..•.;.'..•''' '',','.d.';r';-''','4';''.:'3s.•,:•-,.:.-;!.,..,•.,..,„•:,.",,,.,,;'4..,°..,R::.•., :,..,:.:.'..'•t;..-.,./.i:4.,t.• , 495 ,„ ..„,•1.,A' ,,, . .,,b c; ‘` • ' • :','j'e;'''''.:„. /„ , ;.• '..:.P:7,;,•,,iii07•'•-.,?.°':;t;...r.--,:;:i6t, ,...,10:5,5:!;,.., ,••.,.. ,. ,,,, .... , .,. ) , , . v••p- S 14-4 ST' • . • •t U. M t)9. 4,- ;..•' 'il:. Om 1.'.';. ..-i•SJ,:.''••••.'''''''' .1';.f..:i.-r''. .',1111111k\t'' r.e.". '2, '-'• -''''...,• 1 ,g5• ; .., %t Lat,'•‘; ' 'L‘,..' . ,,i ,s'ef'fc--Xesi--7=1,..,iiiiiir •.,-'', .,--,..,,,,•1.,'•• - - ,'I-,,•...'...1. ..."-,'P'• • it rry%....4.417st • •• 1 'i . ''-i-s/ si XIFS i''•' 1 *. •;:rc A,2•\. , ,"4'.,Ail*tc," ,A1,,) 1'.I.:;,,';..-.;:.,z-i";,‘,".',,;;:grN•'4?..:•4%,.''..;:••:ri'X'M••,-.'......{•;:--.:j,P; V,•-1 1 F•larfrif ,.: ,-A. - 1 N-,-----2-'‘'il 01.;_eir 4.4;-i&j.° ,,e.'' .--.;.-,:-... ifrik ::,:..•ii-.',."7 :i..:1';';-`:,•:::-•:';M,•If.,,.3310,..?;',-; ;;Wi*".I..r,ii?.1• :.f'•,-si.filintsf'IA:• •19 t:.;•A i A:1 4,/4: , \.S i • ,.k- • 4,141,..,,,N A 1,:.*:::.: ;...":„..,..1., - .• - '''.•0- .1 ''.: ..1:':rf'1..."':',..,: •‘...1j:22;; '...4. :•;:',.....';:,,,-::.:114‘1•,..:.,::: ..::',••'.,..,.-.:'..•...II,7511„.701.r117,31.,/,`;‘,IiIr 1 .,', 1 r. l'et :11))':`7<i,4,?,SA,J1.:' . 1.;.4.... . '4,s••,...: , •... ..rr,,g• ., 111,:. -.::..:.••••••••• -1-.r.•• .-:.•:•. .,L+.1•,, • •t•.-.. •,..,',,Rt,•,,ELttif rt. tti;•/.,41V '1'4,- S te4I tattl..”..tr,'to, ,,,,.... 4 ,,,,..,• i ...,. .• 1...._t:.1.....--;.,.•..,..•-:... I ....,•..,-.,...••• to. ;• . • .,... l'•‘,..Pa:;•.1 ,,•, z.,•.PA •, ' 4. ,• ,4 4.4 ..0, . 4..,4rAtv 4, ',Mt , ••.., , pnifY ?:\ • . $.- --444-,u4r.yel..:',.• ••• 1•••'',.,r...,,,,.. . • . .. . .......„,..,,,, ,, ,,, To Pu;,;., • . „,‘ ,„:,,,,-,,,64 :91.v„V/ , 1 .P' '""T--i • ' ' . r•••,. ---- .-.1-F• .- • - - . , 0-...;,, ,i ij•q vi ," ° — • .-....,„,. 4,,r 04. 1, ,rt ,r61-_,..,•4.: ' L,,,,r''''„al,li\s"7••`-':',11,)7/•;1'31 i til, .. r.-.:.%[......•:...N....,,:'::: :::: .a'...i.'s,2...,,,. '':'',':''•''''')... .r,'Z'.71i4i,...1_,.5,• ::-. . • •.fr..-rty...,-,,-.:_____ y - ' ' . '1'4 ' ' ''''--.*'.---'-'.....1 1 1 ''' :--\'1,1 '51.7. '> •:. .' SLVD.71,15i ,7 V.rii i .1.-4' :• .14,44r 1.:101,3 klipi,-••;:f.. .,::,..\:y: 4 fi., ;;,=4:1 pz\14 , 4— , •.. ;;,,,,,ti...„ ,,, ', • ,, „., ,.„,.„ ,i , L. .. . . ,.:,,,,,,,•„,.Vg,,,tret4..at•IA, tw,J.;,.1 i;.'.1 N.i! at; - r. ,....J,11 ''',,,'..4 3 1, : t______Iti. t '`.‘• 01'.4.S1, ...r-r•-•- --.4.4,iX." ••• ••ip...„' .._.,,,, :• ,-i "-•...411'1„,-V-.--4*"" ,,,:,,,,2 .1„. ' 1..: 1 p ,i„., liktit:-k.,1 ' 't . :•i.1"tf4'.4t...,.',..i'&':':•4:,(.0'.• .•:...1 I s: •,''' ;'..",.''',...0! . ,•01.• 4,ig.ti"AaV, \';(..X 'TON 1 4-• ..• ''';':-,•;A-.1".1746A-1;41 ' . .7-St''' :4''..:iA tr'. •-. -. ."•A:‘-:;'• k'•,' it • 1 r•••,,-•!•: '' .•'::;4 rs",-•,s, '';', .;I!. 6 ,--, .:. • ,s. ,,7)•, r • •.•:-.,.:••;,p,r.1741,0-1 VT"..`* "; •• ' • . ,r.,• r-':1•'<1..„,,„•\'‘-- \', I " -ii`, .,1 ..4"1 ,.•.''i ••;:4- 'e'/;.-.,-, •Trott-i,.t•giki;e4,01,4 tor •'• ' ' I'll' • , K19' ',.,'''QO ' ,,,,,i 1!A..:.r.,.1.3,' '''i I ', ,:;' •q,,,,y,., aNr .. , . ...,-;;;,,,„,,,ZI5v:41-14'-•,"..A.. . ,. ' . • 4 ':•' ".• ' \ \" '-'''''''..'." ''''''' '''' ' •.' •""" ' . k 1 r a • ,‘ s..., ,,,,,,,....,. eli,'OliiiiNe A:Aral•ri•"T'{'57.,',' '. -.;,.2...,, . ,....,1f.,.., n.s.h.f,, • ,,..,i, ,,, ...,-.-:l• z.! ' .:T•1,•'•.•'- iwbedt-pr.;54.4;;:;3--:-,,,,-,.,t.'11,Vitt4•'t•,t t..-tttS ,:-.3.0..t -; .. .:.:::- !: . -i,,,,. : i 1 -/' - i't l';',.•_•.':'',:,''--;:;4,..i-141110';;-'i,;?;'...,. .'.!::- .:041;°' t' s•- •,'-fi'i:' :. . •-•'•,j'1,.., . ''.'°4:1.,•*.! ; ,'i...,., Ei .. 2•1 3,, Irr ti. .4 1•,-.X/E.11.461kittfit'....::.itt,,'•:.t-tt:',4,, ,ry tt:......•:, ,,,5::'\rt Z'FIST ST •.'`, ..'.1il •:'!.egt,,,-•-.;..., ,...t6t • , 1 I +I '', ,tr" i.t P.;.;3;.?2 ,31:4201st:sy-.:,',:.; ' 4.770• ..•;.•• ' . f. ''''''i ,V4A. -!...tf,' .':-' .i..4. 1 .7J \'‘. l'zs'1 :i,:.•-•'•','41••••••••fit'I'..••w.1 •::::......:•LJ;• . ..4.• II• , ir 4. t;.•,i ;A .r••••,---°- .,11; .,mpg ••••••., -, •, . ,.....4..—m , -0 ,;,-,:,.:4, • •.„,,.:....,•...... •..;. .. ;•.,,,„ .--• ; 404,,,,,.!,,,,, ...„. ;.• ,..1:-4 ‘m-----.,,IF 4! °..e..--:„---rt.'-'r'l i,.,....:.:,•.,:,...:.:,-.,,,,,..• ,,,,,gamil• ..,•:•,,,,:.. T.,:....•' 6 - ,,,. 1;1 5 rr.).,, "Z., .?",. 1. :'-:' tg •'•-'•, 1 , T " 'I.;!.f 1. .'',.•''.::;.ntliii-gf:;;IrtirtOn.zif';,:•1.:::,•:2 si... ..'..r-..'"•.!, ,i'=',',= 1.i ..• . - i *1 4,t,-;,-' :1 .:I,.•w's:I l''..,........::' „...14,11.:44.,,ggigttra,',...,,:.:::.r .7.1'.-k:'.•';':..:•'•'•' iir:'7.3-IT-'17:-"."LP'• .t; nt;,4:ig SI' .:,.,.' '" ,,,,S,/•--,'''i ,41, 4.4. • ••••••••:•..:'• .:4-6k••..it,'---•"0.4..-4ii,PP ftlitr.,:iit.''',394.4-•ST' ..•'•:•••/."."•.:•• .., Ii,c4c•4•':.47 '4,4 . Al 1,, '•,;,A -ti• . i..-I..:',. •:.: 1.7... .. :•-I :::,.A-ifrita4,<::41.'&,..P ';';,i...i..i'::...,..:.2.-1.,,;-. .4... j;:-.::.:.:....: ••• , -----t- Ti,,Q.:,t,V',1 et...,,,t,it, ,v,t:t ttt.31 t i 1 ,,,i l:.,,-. :12 c 1,,,.., •:::'`'.,•:-....4.:-.•.1 tlf4:14tt....5;tt*7•Itti.,.,.,rttw.4,7tAt 1.:.tt',14.stttt-••: '•t.i..t...t.t.,istt;,•;irt.... • ...,•:'I ' '•'5. t . .:.t' .•t- - ., I.!:..., .:. ,,,,•ttr:44:1',..ftt,:•,?.?1,jikt tilptt4;:„.1:.•,.:•;,••.,•. -.t...,.,.,,!:.,t..: .1, - , ..,'t 0., -.1r4i.t, ''\'.. t Kit'''''''t Zit.:t',1 il 4 gt '41&q-i''A' - .-.1r.z 1: :: ••:'- ':-• -:-;"•14u.,-*i,..?4,4,,,:. ,.-Ai0.i:VA.i':;,'it.:.';''S,,,:i• -'. ••'.,:', .,•':.-.t,.. , - • ' ou L..1,•-ht i T •••• ••• " ••• 1 • '"."..;• 'ye,t'....'•'...".'."'71‘-•-•"'i ••••i .:ft' 1 ASVI..,,411.;:...', :.,,sw:..,,,,ii,...-..2,•3RD ..,Irr.r sr/74,...`;,/, ,,, T(cARR • i,e): -kr..ko,...A., sr st i.r.-.51'‘'''1',31;„ SE ',MT , %,• , .. 41.4.4, -41J4.1, ..191'•-•4r-t3- •ttt-.51.-- T- ip ' ..1. ' \6: ''). 1.--f 1' ,7, A' ..'• i i S, T .V.-34%'.:Zreil.ik , 1 .4, '10,41 , .r.... ZF ,I if. Rtil• 's . j' 5'INV !,.1 t,x',,,,, ., fe 1..,4r*PC,,_._. ; 'f-If-- I 6: ..,.. 1,5 I,., ",:: •F / 0 4 mc t.„ i"T,A w 11-tsr 18.3kti '1. Cif •k.., ' ' ''',..s0 32 v,:, • ,,....„,:. , f i e 5 e MID ST ;, A , ..,'f.. f..11 ,, ZtilL2:br, 124TH S'IJ .1i( ' 4 • e'.t r *-1-- "t! I t ;'- 1 1 <<",•,;-. .dni -/ , ,, . ,.. ., . r * • ...., 7 i A'4.1 'It •. „,,,,...k ei. / ..s.JS6.111..S.T. i'"' , ,,,i 1 '''• • I ..4---Y4qt-Tfii-";•+•-m. g'"r2... -t-Wik-111.74-1•'--F..4----. 16Ffrit. ..'I ....s C...411$1 t ! • • •.4..Z&4114. A- E.2 Q61412•12LAL4 Sr '.\,l1,". -`,.„.1.< , ,L, 1 :.....LI „ti , , w,.., , I.E li;,°1 •41- .1- i ..1„,..p,,L..s,4 a; i ,._11.5it_.....L_r s lack ST i --Ur1.1-', ,1 ' i ,LiTSAIr. • •••''titrc, 1 „ . . ---,.....e,#.,,. •t. =' ...r. 4.- ; Ilk- ; ,.1 ,,,i .c! ;i. i i • ci 't .1 4-.agi 1 ;1,..74.1., ''',-,3,k,i.:::: I I";, 1 loam ,,I i t I. i _.,_,_ ..1 I •) ,4K- ,..f•-.•'-'•-•.t." -''-'-"'--'''''`i•.4: --.:`,Z..---.S-si 'NZ, g _••\„1_12,24.a, 1 5 65TH - E . i '',,- inti;-4 '.4 ST SE =I St'c1.192ttiD ST tt, 1 it ;'•-, •Y ri 4.1 :,- Sti I .,a•.:4. 'v vt vti'-4=tZ 4,11f44, i1.• .,-,..1.... ----- :•s r- -----, — .. --°- r , " -7.," 1 1,1..,,,,',.., . . ,, , ..._1,-....,....., ..., ..,. 4-----:.' ' P•R:f..1'.,1 1 , -.1 ST .1. ii -------— <, : ,.P,ta•, i"'t ,t r V,-'1,,r.. I .. Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or • i any part thereof whether for personal use or resale,without permission. All rights reserved. The Figure Figure 1 Tra . "-':': • • • • ,. , i.•,,.";::,:-. ..• nspo— Site Vicinity i .,..2.:,:-. .,, •..,...:-.,.::,Upon:.,,:,:,,....::, Opus Southpointe h,,,i .• ,,., , - , Il,, • •„:..,,, ‘...•!,••,-, .1-'.,:•••'..--,..- `,.?. ..'•:'i..,,:•e:., ;..., •.',.,,..'••••,.,,• .,•••••• „ M:100100183 Icadlvicinity.cdr 1 1 •,-....-..t,,h,' 23 e • ..__, .... ,7,< r-- ., • ---- ....---,..„,......„, ....<1. y .:.•;„• _ .......,„ ,. . g .,. .,.. ..: _:..,.._...,j., ..) _ .. .;,....., C .,,....:.,:,11. ----------___-- \ W . • Jrc.. y-c.', .., . , lg.\ •‘: 7 ti„-;\,-,.. j-_-__„....,. c.' .;;,.. ;,.- . , 0....,.. ,;,/.. ,.-,.,_.., ,_...---, - ...A ilie) ' '•,/./,..!..,,,... \- ------ -----1 -.,..-, V , \.:... ' ''', :1-'..'71'.--.' •44''. el), • ,,' , ._..../ .---..: ),- - • . .. ,-,-----. /.(,-7- ,/407--:. •-,-,,, . -- --- :.4..- ..-- ,,,• -..... , L-. .. - 411, / / • tf.--• ' . ‘ -• ,i)/• '0/•4/ 1 ,..i.• ,. .,,A,..9 1 ... .Ise'i ' 4 0. ..1,/,,i `1.,.'47,/:ft •/10%44t..i//2 1 ' :4,k)•, 2. /.,,• - ,- c),,, ... ..-,,.///* •.- a .1 r 1- • 47F 'i ,4?., ' o ,„ , 81:7 0,r -i 5-.., 4'-' • .-li/ - '' '/ ..., r.- ,.: /, .-4‘4g, .. ,v, m: , 44•4,,i•,_",1-- egiA. //:'•`'..4••• "'1,•,/.7/ . L r, "•Lft .`;IP,1//, . . ./77:?I 11 41 . .•• l•if 0:;5';':,'//,', lt /• .,.t .-.-t..'t,f•'f Y.-,-./..0.!„ . 3 <A . ,t,-",.'...4.. .4•-,4,4-.,,,.' •',4.'4...b:4.. .k9. •ir.AVt,'/.1 I›l••••.,-.4.14*.4-4#,,,(7./...K.6..',,i_,,.... 1 •-:/,,,.-•'.,:,i..v/..,.,'..'-,7..'- •• *--..- .../ ,•-.1•1,4..:..-0-`-',;,0, :s ---.- "Y•---,,,,, 1 /-5. -4 •,,m, ,....... .,„,.. . -,,,,,,,,9.]*/,-: •iiti ....,,,,.,,,,/ .....,,,,,, -0-- 400/...../.„ -.: .. •„ip...-,,-...../. ..-,si., ----- '% \_../ . .,/ .,gib..„,_...,/..-/- •,.•.„. , ,.. , .•e • '''7r.%::/:',.'''./ . / ""••:....., // • 1.T°•/,/...:••,...1/; ., .1044:.72...,-..,.. ;44p.,' '' /4;/.-.....0/ '.• '•'•.L7ifi .7.:•4://....0 ..../. /...- '' • , ..., - ..1 , -, .": • i i'l'::./2,'' :IA ,1. '•'4*-/.•.... ,' 11116, ...-'.•-'''' • ' ..., 41).-- ..• c'fft#.-Ar//, • l 411 ' 9•11; .• ,, •- e • . . • -;•.• r. • ''----..- . .4, •tiA, •••,.„ .__,...1 .wr.,Rei&r* '' -:',/,/ -, ..'.,//-0,7, ''z ..,,•.:./..- , . , „if,.,..".rt.,,,,„ ;,...4410,47,-.rip.,,,.;.:,,i:04411i., .40:647iit. ,t.1.:-.1 a"4.,'. ..'W..:'. • ./4.,,-. ..//:''''/,' -c'';.;'.::f".''''''' '' „A ..',.4,1;\'‘ ' . • — -- , . SII,:-,.,........ //-747",.,,,,.. .....---r•to.7.0 ,t4rultit,..., . /4e, plitir 4) . & . 4. A, solt 4 * a ,s, , ,\-%. - '• -. •.-- Y,-,:4 ''' , 'i/ '.'#) • ' .,. •:::-/", ' "/; ' ••'•-•,/,' ''' mIlk 4- 44;471 'z''''.' i''lkg IliVii 47, .•••-. 0/..' •//.. ''''.'...* . \\AV-4irr'Sdlifi*X.4)' ' /lk• .f" . 421,y.'" ''', -,,A., ',,,,,,Y,/, ; 1 ..1-.1kr,701-0,, 4.- • 4iii T. ''3'''•. •. \-:.-It-. ,,,,,11, iti, „ . .. . , ' -411.,...•1:111, ./... • t. 1.‘110 ''..../ ':.::417, ' ''.• * ".t.S.:',7 • .,% 41411,\ ' '4A '' ' ' a •••-ii'.',,dir;'"iroAc*V o.r.s• ••• 4 q•-• ."41.4, /' ' ''S,• ,411,, ,,,,D. --.....„/'3,..:.=-4 ` •,„,..,, '-'5"',.''',..'...?;.• : '. :. 4`49i.25, 74,11.1/447,.1 i \'• . Arfj._:1,2„-:-.1,1,:,':.,iii,.f:,'/.....,. ...\• -,/^0..0.,, ----:::.;,.,.,,,,iiii. -,-,..:9 a -. • i.4.1 i-.k,''si* . 'Ts.... ^',. -"..7..z,,z..:_ili„....,--,4,/..:.'-'7:•-."1":•-•''-1,041,*„.szt./ ," ,,.'.\101...._,„.„.411 •-•-.111$ .• 71,7:' •-.•• •(•-,• V...,41,#iha-% • ,c,• .;. ctA,.y.,, 4,...Jwat4 • e. %,,,,,,,..A nK.I.,..1A4,7*? .,•94**,.77kr ' Ci--;:.` ,.0,-firroP- w .•, ' t.. .••,-•4, ,174,.. . .. ' . -,,,, .--- • . ---,- ..'• A 41.-ir R•is . ,. .....' .%. . • ' ..,..•4 ..• r•ll 0 'g. •...'4% .%' // er . le.. 14% . gfi..Y/.f.4 ,'•''''.."'01" .. .4* • • . 4'', / IV/ '•. //,..41 83 k3 t% . 4.'",41P(//,'• 'it:. ':•41,1/.;,.''.44PA '...t.i. :•..,...--,.....//,,. 4.ta : `,4...' 17.7,,I ,i i is ko,..... , •'fli • 4 tff tg/ ‘...• ;, ...„ ...al .,.,...,,.......r.---, --//it/•-t.,,,•30,.. . .,,,,./..,-,N,,4,„,;.... ,,f,/,.. -1/2'• ' , •410'.,-NttP ,..,\ 'i40" , • ,... ..... .. ............................................... • ,t-,,,_ ,,,. 4,7...,://eA• ',,., a s:FC--z-700, ,-....,,,,-•va F hf., . .... ''. - • '/,-'4 iff"'Yq.h',r.. -.:.''" '' ;'ik'' MB .101 .. . .,.741).;464.f./,/ .44 ,,- -,-----.: •--Ats, .." E.I.::.,..:E:-1::•::::-:.:•::::::::•"1.::::::::::.::::....1.:.:::-:.;:::..ri...::• rI"-*.r.44• '.' 4-) i'4.i.) .,',0, ' ....... . ............ as .wit • • — -.."7 • :. • •_ .. Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 EXISTING AND FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS This section of the report describes both existing and future year 2001 without-project conditions in the vicinity of the project site, including the surrounding street network, traffic volumes, traffic operations, and transit service. Street Network Existing Street System Existing roadway and intersection characteristics and channelization are illustrated in Figure 3 and are described in detail in the following paragraphs. S Grady Way is a 5-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph) and a center two-way left-turn lane. This roadway is also classified as State Route (SR) 515 between Talbot Road S and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S adjacent to the site. On- street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The signalized study intersections along S Grady Way include Rainier Avenue S, Talbot Road S, and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S. Rainier Avenue S (SR 167)is a 7-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph north of S Grady Way. South of S Grady Way, SR 167 transitions to a freeway with two travel lanes and one high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction and a posted speed limit of 60 mph. On-street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection is located within close proximity of the I-405/SR 167 freeway interchange. Talbot Road S is a 5-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph and a center two-way left-turn lane. This roadway is also classified as SR 515 south of S Grady Way. Like S Grady Way and Rainier Avenue S, on-street parking is prohibited. Talbot Road S widens to six lanes at the south leg of the S Grady Way intersection. The signalized study intersections along Talbot Road S include S Renton Village Place and S Grady Way. Williams Avenue S is a 2-lane, one-way (southbound), minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The southbound approach at S Grady Way is stop-sign controlled and includes one left-turn lane and two right-turn lanes. Wells Avenue S is a 2-lane, one-way (northbound), minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Wells Avenue S forms a one-way couplet with Williams Avenue S. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. Main Avenue S is a 4-lane principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 30 mph north of S Grady Way. This roadway is also classified as SR 515. The signalized intersection of Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way was recently improved to include two left-turn lanes from Main Avenue S to Benson Road S as well as one left-turn lane from northbound Benson Road S to westbound S Grady Way. -' M.:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,"Inc.2000 Page 4 • O O OSSE ) —► f— PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 4 LANES (I) 30 MPH R ARTERIAL . �� MINOR 2 LANES �•, -... 11 25 MPH ;�. 1 b .. s W J !I 1 _!` MINOR ARTERIAL __, 3 �r m 2 LANES 3I 25 MPH ` O s sr�l S ` -4 •C)I 4E) I y At,,,:, .' s RENTON CITY if € .1 :-� HALL ; —J SW 7TH ST 1,,Z3 : ''' ��i ,oe IN pi ftn0.4,4 ,„:„.,...„.•::,:„,:„,:,,,:,:,„:,:,,,,,,,,::,:,,,,,,,,,:,,,:,:,::::: II0.°,,,,,\ edCC n'd { z PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL �-�' o {• 5 LANES L4j vn ,F: W 'I - ';p ki1 35 MPH m £ ada iT+"`+ \Y J 1111 . ( S RENTONVILLGE PLT 1 o-ti1 • MINOR ARTERIAL 2 LANES 35 MPH • LEGEND TRAFFIC SIGNAL ' < <`» >' << FIgura 3 .. .I . '<''?< Existing Roadway Network Characteristics Opus sSout otn te q ;n., ;�r -w"``'(6)"M:1001001831Cadlgraphicl LindaK 08/1110011:01 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11, 2000 Benson Road S is a 2-lane minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. On- street parking is prohibited along this roadway. The northbound approach at S Grady Way is controlled with a traffic signal and operates with one through lane onto Main Avenue S and one left-turn lane onto S Grady Way. S Renton Village Place is a 2-lane collector arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. On-street parking is prohibited on S Renton Village Place. The eastbound approach at Talbot Road S is controlled with a traffic signal and includes one left-turn lane and one right- turn lane. Planned Street Improvements -Future Based on the City of Renton's 2001-2006 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), no roadway widening or capacity improvement projects are identified within the study area. The TIP does describe the need to perform a comprehensive analysis of short- and long- range transportation improvements in the critical area bounded by S Grady Way, I-405, SR 167, and Talbot Road S, including the intersection of Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way. According to City staff, potential intersection improvements are being evaluated as part of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1-405 Corridor Program. Since a variety of improvements will be evaluated, and the preferred alternative is unknown, this traffic analysis does not incorporate specific improvements at the Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. Traffic Volumes Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were collected at the intersections of Talbot Road S/S Renton Village Place and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way on July 18, 2000 and July 20, 2000, respectively. Peak hour traffic volumes at the remaining study intersections were collected by the City of Renton in 1999 and increased by 2 percent per year to reflect existing (2000) traffic conditions. Figure 4 illustrates existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at study intersections. Year 2001 without-project peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 5. At the direction of City staff, these volumes were estimated by increasing existing traffic volumes by an annually compounded growth rate of 2 percent per year. This percentage is consistent with recent planning-level traffic studies within the City. Traffic Operations The operational characteristics of an intersection are determined by calculating the intersection's level of service (LOS). The operation of an intersection—as a whole and its individual turning movements—can be described alphabetically with a range of levels of service (LOS A-F), with LOS A indicating free-flowing traffic conditions and LOS F indicating long vehicle delays. At signalized intersections, LOS is measured in terms of control delay per vehicle and is reported for the intersection as a whole. Control delay is defined as the initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and trial acceleration delay. u J,i M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 ->: _'n Page 6f` ; ,�u,r F` O1,225(700) O O (0 (185) 185 225(95) (15)25 5(25) (255)545 40 (20) J 5 I (2 )55 655 f 3 0((880) NOT TO SCALE (110)270 J 4_ 100 150 195 740 y 415 850 (535)BOO -•.- -4- 430(550) 175 510 -) r 745 750 (20)65 ) <165 (205) � (260) 625 290(1,055) (455) 145 1370(585) (120)585 325(1,260) 590(985) O360(150) (860) 1,615 J ` I Wf i (1,150)1,085J• I(50) 90 v, lI j� e a c��2:-I (75)50 s 120(255) m 3( r.' z g i'�OI`. 1 O 2,050(390) S 6TH ST �^T1 0 ; 1 t ��'(40)20 1 - i.1.,-% 0 1 ' i}RENTON CITY -;0*-::. HALL 10 55 d a ( ) ! .SW. 7TH ST.,.,„ _,�..,_N.s +:fix ''' Ex' 35) 345 s .3 :i::::i;:;;:;j:}j:??;{iiijtii�'i'}j ';''�.��' .....:..:: : :::.: fY 245 95 3 S i s'" I 875(2,365) 4' I �y?fir} / 11. 41 . m i• v 0677 . F S RENTON VILLAGE PL l LEGEND ?' '" Figure 4 (XX) = AM PEAK iiiiiPUThigiffiliiinien XX = PIJ PEAK HOUR HOUR 1:' ., Existing(2000)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes '' =,� itirt l;� Opus Southpointe (A)M:1001001831Cadlgraphic1 LindaK 013/1110011:01 O1,250(715) O O 011) (190) 190 230(95) (15)25 5(25) (260)555 40 (20) (25) 7 �� ((1185 55 ,(325 I ) - `► NOT TO SCALE €110 275 , � 100 155 200 755 —► 425 865 (545)815 —► r— 440(560) 180 520 j 760€765 20 65 170 210 ((265)640 {�295(1,075) (465) 150 5(595) (120)595 330(1,285) 600(1,005) O365(155) • (875) 1,64 _ f( • 0,175)1005i `3 , ,: (50)90 y y v) y„� <cl Q ¢1 R tf iNZy �f,11 ;:I (75)50 w3 PT120(260) m ) , : O2,090(400) S 6TH ST m __a . • \r593-% ik 20:J RENTON CITY HALL Q(:81:4: (10)55 SW 7TH ST.,..,.,.. `9, "`; �'' 35 3 50 • ) II I • E� T 10- •:1 '3' (250)95 ,, :, GA, "'r v'F :i Oin vi+ . f-?'c s.,000,-,2 co r., co) t. fi y:.. m co o- of{j� GRpDYIii .j y�s:� W t . r. • II S RENTON VILLAGE PL..........a,m,: f I LEGEND (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR A" XX = PM PEAK HOUR 'E: ski a z:71�.......................................................i?iXi:?E"E''?f?i;g. Figure 5 2001 Without-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes I;'; . •- s, .'. >�:: nnt a �� Sout ,�v �South Pointe • (C)M:1001001831Cad1graphic1 LindaK 08/11f0011:01 is Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 IAt unsignnlized intersections, level of service is measured in terms of control delay per vehicle but is typically reported for the turning movement or approach that experiences the most delay, not the intersection as a whole. Appendix A provides more detailed level of service definitions and criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections, based on information contained in the Highway Capacity Manual(Third Edition, 1997). Existing (2000) and future (2001) without-project levels of service, average vehicular delays, and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios were calculated at study intersections based on methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. The Synchro (v. 4.0) and Highway Capacity Software (v. 3.1c) programs were used to calculate peak hour levels of service at signalized and unsignalized study intersections. The results of the AM and PM peak hour LOS calculations are illustrated in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Intersection LOS worksheets for existing and future without-project conditions are contained in Appendix A of this report. Table 1. Existing(2000)and Future(2001)Without-Project LOS-AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 56.4 0.95 E 56.7 0.96 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy C 29.7 0.70 C 29.7 0.71 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 10.3 0.56 B 10.6 0.57 Talbot Rd S/S Renton Village PI A 3.7 0.75 A 3.9 0.76 Unsignalized Intersection5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy(SB left) C 19.9 - C 20.3 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the fuming movement that experiences the most delay. Table 2. Existing(2000)and Future(2001)Without-Project LOS-PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 59.1 0.95 E 63.0 0.98 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy D 41.8 0.81 D 42.4 0.83 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy A 9.0 0.58 A 9.3 0.59 •i Talbot Rd S/S Renton Village PI B 14.0 0.90 B 15.1 0.92 Unsignalized Intersection5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy(SB left) C 21.8 - C 22.4 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. M:100100183IWP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000' Page 9 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Soufhpointe August 11, 2000 By 2001, all signalized study intersections are anticipated to continue operating at existing AM and PM peak hour levels of service. Existing operations at signalized study intersections range from LOS A at Talbot Road S/S Renton Village Place (AM peak hour) and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way (PM peak hour) to LOS E at Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way (AM and PM peak hours). At Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way, the southbound left-turning movement experiences the greatest delay during peak hours. This turning- movement currently operates at LOS C and is projected to operate at the same peak hour level of service for future without-project conditions. Transit Service The site is served by King County Metro Transit. The South Renton Park-and-Ride lot is located within a few blocks of the site at Shattuck Avenue S/S Grady Way; it serves a total of nine transit routes. Adjacent to the site, six of these routes (101, 148, 153, 167, 169, and 565) provide weekday transit service along S Grady Way and two routes (101 and 148) provide service along Talbot Road S. A transit stop also exists on the south side of S Grady Way adjacent to the proposed project site,just east of Talbot Road S. A bus pull-out lane is currently provided for this stop. M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 10 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 PROJECT IMPACTS This section of the report documents project impacts on the surrounding roadway network. First, site-generated peak hour traffic volumes are estimated, distributed, and assigned to the surrounding roadway network and study intersections. Second, future with- project traffic volumes are projected, traffic volume impacts identified, and peak hour intersection operations evaluated. The third section evaluates the peak hour operation, queuing, and auxiliary lane warrants at site access driveways. Finally, required frontage improvements and transit impacts are discussed. Project Trip Generation Weekday daily and peak hour trip generation was estimated based on information contained in Trip Generation (Sixth Edition, 1997) and the Trip Generation Handbook (1998), both published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Based on the recommended procedure for estimating trip generation (Section 3.4 of the Trip Generation Handbook), regression equations described in Trip Generation for Land Use No. 710—General Office Building—were used to estimate trip generation for the office component of the project. Average trip rates for Land Use No. 831—Quality Restaurant—were used to estimate trip generation for the restaurant component of the project. Since the restaurant is not expected to serve breakfast, it was assumed that the restaurant's trip generation would be negligible during the AM peak hour. The proposed Southpointe project is defined as a multi-use development consisting of two land use classifications between which some trips would be made without using the adjacent roadway network. Based on the recommended procedure for estimating trip generation at multi-use sites (Section 7.5 of the Trip Generation Handbook), unconstrained internal capture rates were applied for trip origins/destinations within an office-retail development. It was estimated that during an average weekday, approximately 32 trips would be linked between the office and restaurant components of the project. Likewise, during the PM peak hour, fewer than 5.trips would be linked between these components. Appendix B contains the worksheets contained in the Trip Generation Handbook and used to estimate both weekday daily and peak hour trip generation and internal capture for the proposed project. Since the restaurant would most likely generate very few—if any—trips during the AM peak hour, it was assumed that no internally captured trips would be made during this hour. All weekday daily and peak hour trips generated by the office buildings would be new trips to the surrounding roadway network. However, the proposed restaurant would attract some trips that would already be traveling on the adjacent roadway network en route to another destination. In general, trips generated by commercial/retail land uses are divided into two components: pass-by and new trips. The following provides a more detailed description of these trip types: • Pass-By Trips - A trip that is already on the roadway network en route to another destination. Pass-by trips impact the driveway turning movements at access driveways, but not the surrounding street system. „,.,..., M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 11 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11, 2000 • New Trips - A single-purpose trip generated by the proposed project. For purposes of this analysis, new trips to the roadway network are estimated to account for the remainder of the total driveway trips. For this study, the daily and PM peak hour pass-by percentages for the restaurant component were estimated at 20 percent and 30 percent, respectively. These percentages were developed in coordination with City Transportation Department staff after reviewing published information in Trip Generation for a variety of different restaurant types. Trip generation estimates for the proposed project are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Southpointe Trip Generation Estimates Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Size Trip Total Trip Total Trips Trip Total Trips Land Use (gsf) Rate Trips Rate Trips (in/out) Rate Trips (in/out) General Office Building 291,000 10.36 3,014 1.50 437 (385/52) 1.40 406 (69/337) Less Internally Captured Trips 1.1% -32 - - - 0.5% -2 -(1/1) Net New Trips 2,982 437 (385/52) 404 (68/336) Quality Restaurant 10,000 89.95 900 - - - 7.49 75 (50/25) Less Internally Captured Trips 3.6% -32 - - - 2.7% -2 -(1/1) Less Pass-By Trips 20% -174 - - - 30% -22 -(11/11) Net New Trips 694 - - 51 (38/13) Total Net New Trips 3,676 437 (385152) 455 (106/349) As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would generate a total of approximately 3,850 weekday vehicle trips, of which 437 trips would occur during the AM peak hour and 477 trips would occur during the PM peak hour at the site driveways. Of these trips, 3,676 trips would be considered new trips during an average weekday, with approximately 437 and 455 new trips occurring during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. As was mentioned earlier, the existing site contains three buildings totaling about 83,410 gsf. Since on-site operations have been suspended for about two years, no credit was given against project trip generation to account for the existing on-site uses. However, • because this site was operational and generating traffic at the time the City developed their Impact Fee Program (1995), traffic generation from the previously operational on-site uses will be credited against the total traffic impact fees (see Mitigation Measures section of this report). Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Peak hour trips generated by the proposed office and restaurant components were distributed separately onto the surrounding roadway network and at study intersections. Distribution of restaurant-generated trips was based on the City's PM peak hour travel demand forecast model. Trips generated by the office component were distributed based on existing travel patterns in the area and adjustments to the City's model distribution for retail trips to reflect more commuter travel to/from I-405. Peak hour,;distribution percentages are M:100100183IWP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000— `' `Pagel12 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11, 2000 illustrated in Figure 6 and were developed in coordination with City Transportation Department staff prior to preparing this study. Peak hour project-generated traffic was assigned to the roadway network and at study intersections based on the distribution percentages shown in Figure 6. Site-generated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at study intersections and site access driveways are illustrated in Figure 7. Assignment of traffic at access driveways was based on the location and proposed operation of these driveways as well as the layout of on-site surface parking areas. Traffic Volume Impact Site-generated traffic volumes were added to future without-project volumes (shown in Figure 5) to estimate future with-project volumes shown in Figure 8. By comparing future with- and without-project traffic volumes, the relative impacts at study intersections can be identified. Table 4 summarizes the relative AM and PM peak hour traffic volume impacts at study intersections. Table 4. Project Traffic Impacts at Study Intersections 2001 With-Project 2001 Without- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project TEV1 Project Project Project Project Intersection (AM) (PM) Traffic TEV %of TEV2 Traffic TEV % of TEV2 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy 5,340 5,630 262 5,602 4.7% 262 5,892 4.4% Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy 3,890 3,690 293 4,183 7.0% 322 4,012 8.0% Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy 1,385 1,850 109 1,494 7.3% 119 1,969 6.0% Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy 2,590 3,375 87 2,677 3.2% 93 3,468 2.7% Talbot Rd S/S Renton Village PI 3,145 3,505 44 3,189 1.4% 50 3,555 1.4% 1. TEV represents the total entering vehicles at each study intersection during the peak hour. 2. Represents the percentage of site-generated traffic entering the intersection during each respective peak hour. During the AM peak hour, project-generated traffic would account for about one to seven percent of total entering traffic at study intersections, with the greatest impact at the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way and Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersections. Project traffic would account for no more than eight percent of total entering traffic at study intersections during the PM peak hour. Due to the project, entering traffic volumes at the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection would increase by almost 300 trips during the AM peak hour and by almost 325 trips during the PM peak hour. The next section of this report evaluates the traffic operational impacts of the project based on increases in traffic at study intersections. Traffic Operations Impact Based on future with-project traffic volumes, AM and PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) were calculated at the signalized and unsignalized study intersections. These calculations used the same intersection variables (number of lanes, traffic control, cycle M:1001001831WPI00183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 " JL'i'_ re age 13 0 NOT TO SCALE , . • ISa „„,::i:.iIiiii:.... ti.Anii OFFICE COMPONENT 1, '::::.:Miiiii::• 1 r r RESTAURANT COMPONENT 411) '------N ? "...........................,,, ........ . cf:?15) ' t ,............., ...,, LI 01 0 :,.- • ••..-- cn* •••ri:i*i•;.*':::•:.. ...::::::.:.. ::..t. • n P5roi::i . 20%i •:•. • *.i. ..--- •i I 10% 426643 S 6TH ST I 1 .r‘to5j ../ • 1 0% iiiiii:$ / .. RENTON crrY 11 / '1 SW 7TH ST .1 ' ..... :.i:i:•??.•ii::::::.:::i::.:::::::aa.:M]::iii:::::ilMf 41 ........ ............................................ ................................. 0 ........„.......,... .,:::.............................„,........„...... AlligniSitelli 1, .1 ,..,1 -' 0% '5%.0 ....................................... ...•••••••.•.••.••••................... .•.- :ii.ia:1;i:i. ................... ......................,........... \:i:iiiili•;i!iliiPi ::. tk 1 ... 'ilXiii$ LC1 '' k • 0 .,.................... , n 6 giS.gl. ' ,-= ool 0 , C3 .::§i:::M:•" ;', ' . 51 5 ...1 Q67 t, •....:i. ....] iS RENTON VILLAGE PL t. ....:::::... 30% ii80g 18% •:ION: .1 ' ..,...... ................_ ..... .............................................. , -,, 111.410Theignal Figure 6 .• IIIIMNilliggitill Project Trip Distribution n..................... 777117..7 7:........ ...... GI : '' !_1.:..'", -, .f ; '.r?7 , ...,. :ii! °PUS SMithiNinte '';. " L'.----* ' .., .................... . .................. . I —(6)MA001006-ta agraphicl UndaK 08/11/00 1101 ,4.], . I Qo(o) 0 0 40 (0) 0 1 3 (19) (15)8 0(0) (19)8 0 (0) • (4)-1 u -2(0) L. (0) 0 �� fj 2(5) `► NOT TO SCALE • (0 0 i 'L 17 2) 5� (19i 7 --s- -.1- 18 3)(0 0 r172 26) , . (13)89 -► 22(77) (18(05)49 0 � �� 1734(3)) (0) 0 I 45 (193) (46) 6 209(31) 0(0) { O 0(0) (58)17 •••-:-'-'::\ f 11 (8) 53i 7 ) i #)# (2) 18 71cn w �n I;It :1 (19) 5 s w r. ; 10 4 O 36(5) S 6TH ST 0i '''"'' a::'2,;1 { 2 :^ RENTON CITY IP `'' HALL (0) 0 SW 7TH ST �'� �s fir' . ill (0) 0 ..:.:*iaKiiNiiiiii:iiiiiii§iiiii::iiiiiiiiimiiii.) ( ) Q� Ati iE1 " g0 c:, i i 0 .r ifi .o...,K r I :� y ,:::saau o M i-' • (_57) _ _ ,�I 51 S RENTON VILLAGE PL 3 . • l ` O O O -5(0) • (55) 7 131(11) j12(5 ) (4 -23 ► -0- 0 5) 122(27) (200) 68 -) ,r 30(91) C 41(5) 3(19) 66 4(20) LEGEND (9) (27) 129 (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR • 10(19) XX = PM PEAK HOUR 3 Figure 7 �, rs.,::,. Site-Generated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes z', ,. i figgiliiiilIMM:Enii Ut IJ ak Opus So hpointe J 1' (E)M:1001001831CadlgraphIc1 UndaK 08/11/00 11:02 O1,250(715) O O 0 (190) 190 (114) (30)33 5(25) (279)563 40(20) JI (79)669 NIL, 513(590) 110 275 117 157 (25)55 \� f(327(190) J L NOT TO SCALE 180 520 -i 9798 20 65 204 2 (558)904 -► - 462(637) 14 Ir (450) 689 N 312(1,078) (465) 150 420(788) (166) 601 539(1,316) 600(1,005) O365(155) (933) 1,662 J 51 (1,183)1,158) 1 I a b' (52)108 y N 1 N f 01 f3 W ,'. • -41 -4/1i% 1. -t 0, (94)55 cn r _s 3 120 (260) m 3 ` i O f if r O 2,126(405) 66115T 0 ''' a �r �i J� f ij :; ' RENTON CITY } f (10)55 . HALL SW 71.1ST P{ .\J, f.;"j .r 35 350 '1 A D .11 i 31. ' • fOifi o3 { lit i...) GRP`( 0. t . 67 C � S RENTON VILLAGE PL ii 0 OO] cp, 2,105(440) (495) 2,117 131(11) 1\ , 12(55) L. 122(27) (549 838-68 ► 995 825) 200) (ter 30(91) �' 41(5) I N (19) 66 4(20) LEGEND (9) (2,447) 1,079 (XX) = AM PEAK HOUR • . .: 960(2,439) )O( = PM PEAK HOUR 14 _ .... Figure 8 siggaliSnong 2001 With-Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes '11 SothP°rote Ii,,;a.; 1 ; (F)MA001001831Cadl®raphic1 LindaK 08/11/0011:02 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe • August 11,2000 lengths, etc.) as were used in evaluating future without-project conditions. For comparison purposes, Tables 5 and 6 illustrate existing and future without- and with-project levels of service, average delays, and v/c ratios during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Appendix A contains the detailed peak hour level of service worksheets for future with-project conditions. • Table 5. Existing(2000)and Future(2001)Without-and With-Project LOS-AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project 2001 With-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4. Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 56.4 0.95 E 56.7 0.96 E 58.7 0.97 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy C 29.7 0.70 C 29.7 0.71 C 31.5 0.71 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy B 10.3 0.56 B 10.6 0.57 B 10.6 0.58 Talbot Rd S/S Renton Village PI A 3.7 0.75 A 3.9 0.76 A 4.0 0.78 Unsignalized Intersection5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy(SB left) C 19.9 - C 20.3 - C 22.8 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. Table 6. Existing(2000)and Future(2001)Without-and With-Project LOS-PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2001 Without-Project 2001 With-Project Location LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Signalized Intersections4 Rainier Ave S/S Grady Wy E 59.1 0.95 E 63.0 0.98 E 76.2 1.04 Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy D 41.8 0.81 D 42.4 0.83 D 42.5 0.83 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S/S Grady Wy A 9.0 0.58 A 9.3 0.59 A 9.7 0.62 Talbot Rd S/S Renton Village PI B 14.0. 0.90 B 15.1 0.92 B 15.6 0.93 Unsignalized Intersection5 Williams Ave S/S Grady Wy(SB left) C 21.8 - C 22.4 - C 24.8 - 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle 3. V/C=Critical volume-to-capacity ratio 4. LOS,delays,and v/c ratios at signalized intersections reflect the operation of the intersection as a whole. 5. LOS and delays at unsignalized intersections reflect the turning movement that experiences the most delay. As illustrated in Tables 5 and 6, study intersections would operate at the same peak hour level of service with or without the addition of project traffic. Study intersections would operate as well as LOS A, in particular, at Talbot Road S/S Renton Village Place during the AM peak hour and Main Avenue S-Benson Road S/S Grady Way during the PM peak hour. Study intersections would operate no worse than the AM and PM peak hour level of service at Rainier M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc. 000 Page..1,7 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 1 Avenue S/S Grady Way (LOS E); this intersection is projected to operate at the same level of service both with and without project traffic. Site Access Analysis Three site access driveways are proposed, including two driveways on Talbot Road S and one driveway on S Grady Way. The northerly driveway on Talbot Road S is proposed approximately 400 feet south of the S Grady Way intersection (measured from centerline to centerline) and would be limited to right-in/right-out operation. The southerly driveway on Talbot Road S would be located approximately 360 feet south of the northerly driveway (760 feet south of the S Grady Way centerline) and operate as a full-turning movement driveway. The westbound approach to this driveway would be stop sign-controlled. The driveway on S Grady Way is proposed approximately 150 feet west of the Williams Avenue S intersection and I'I 530 feet east of the Talbot Road S centerline. Outbound left-turning traffic would be restricted at this driveway and right-in/left-in/right-out turning movements would be allowed. An evaluation of LOS and queuing was conducted at the site driveways for future with- project peak hour traffic conditions. A signal warrant analysis was also conducted for the proposed southerly driveway on Talbot Road S. The need for right-turn deceleration lanes was also evaluated at all driveways. The following subsections describe each of the evaluations. Driveway Levels of Service Weekday AM and PM peak hour level of service analyses were conducted for the proposed access driveways on Talbot Road S and S Grady Way. Table 7 shows the calculated levels of service at these site accesses. Table 7. 2001 With-Project Driveway LOS Summary _ AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Driveway Location LOS1 Delay2 LOS Delay Access Driveway/S Grady Wy Westbound Left(In) B 10.2 B 10.5 Northbound Right(Out) B 10.3 -B 12.7 Talbot Rd S/Northerly Access Driveway Westbound Right(Out) D 34.0 C 17.0 Talbot Rd S/Southerly Access Driveway Southbound Left(In) E 46.9 B 10.7 Westbound Left(Out)3 F >50.0 C 23.9 Westbound Right(Out) E 38.5 C 15.2 1. LOS=Level of Service(A-F) 2. Delay=Average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle 3. LOS and delay values were calculated using the two-stage gap acceptance methodology documented in the Highway Capacity Manual(1997). These calculations are based on,the operation of this intersection with a westbound left-turn lane and a refuge/merge lane (existing center two-way left-turn lane)on Talbot Road S. J ../_ l r '17r S.. M:I00I00183IWPI00183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 18 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 The results of the site access level of service analyses show that during the AM peak hour, all driveway turning movements would operate in the LOS B-E range with the exception of the westbound (outbound) left-turning movement at the southerly access driveway (LOS F). The calculated delay for this turning movement is attributable, for the most part, to the high northbound peak hour traffic volumes on Talbot Road S. Although this turning movement would operate at LOS F, it is expected to generate an estimated five vehicles during the AM peak hour. In addition, the calculated average delay does not account for gaps in the northbound traffic stream created by the traffic signal at Talbot Road S/S Renton Village Place. Therefore, since the calculated delay is most likely overstated and this turning movement would serve very few peak hour trips, its operation is not considered a significant impact warranting mitigation. During the PM peak hour, all driveway turning movements are anticipated to operate in the LOS B to LOS C range. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is used to evaluate warrants for the installation of traffic signals. Eleven warrants are described with the instruction that "traffic control signals should not be installed unless one or more of the signal warrants are met" (Section 4C-2). Typically, if the Peak Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 11) is not satisfied, then the remaining warrants are similarly not satisfied. As such, the Peak Hour Volume Warrant was evaluated at the intersection of the southerly access driveway along Talbot Road S since no turning restrictions are proposed. The signal warrant worksheet for this intersection is contained in Appendix C. Both the AM and PM peak hours were evaluated and it was determined that a traffic signal would not be warranted at this location based on its peak hour traffic volumes. Vehicle Queuing Queuing analyses were conducted to evaluate critical peak hour queue lengths at site ti access driveways and the adjacent signalized intersection (Talbot Road S/S Grady Way). In particular, maximum queues were calculated for the southbound left-turn lane at the southerly access driveway on Talbot Road S as well as the westbound left-turn lane at the access driveway i on S Grady Way. Maximum queue lengths were estimated to reflect the worst-case traffic queue occurring during the AM or PM peak hour. For this analysis, an average vehicle length of 25 feet was assumed. Adjacent to the site, a center two-way left turn lane exists on both Talbot Road S and S Grady Way. These lanes would provide storage for left-turning vehicles at access driveways. The two-way left-turn lane on Talbot Road S transitions into one of the two northbound left-turn lane at the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection and therefore, maximum queues were also calculated for the northbound approach on Talbot Road S at its signalized intersection with S Grady Way. Queuing analysis at Talbot Road S/S Grady Way was based on Equation 16.19 from the ITE published Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook (Second Edition, 1982). This equation relates the maximum vehicle queue to the flow rate, cycle length of the signal, and the red time associated with each movement. The red time for this calculation was determined from M:100100183IWP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 19 i ,' Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 optimized level of service calculations for 2001 with-project traffic conditions. Queuing analysis at site access driveways was based on Figure 10-12 of the Highway Capacity Manual. This figure estimates the maximum number of vehicles in queue using the hourly volume and the v/c ratio • calculated as part of the level of service worksheets. Table 8 summarizes the maximum traffic queues during the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix D contains the detailed queue length calculations and estimates for all queue evaluations. Table 8. Vehicle Queuing Analysis Intersection Proposed Maximum Queue(feet) (Movement) Storage(ft) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Talbot Rd S/S Grady Wy1 Northbound Left-Turn 525 475 325 Talbot Rd S/Southerly Access Driveway2 Southbound Left-Turn(In) 100 50 25 Access Driveway/S Grady Wy2 Westbound Left-Turn(In) 100 25 25 1. Queues at this signalized intersection are based on Equation 16.19 from the ITE Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook(Second Edition, 1982). 2. Queues at access driveway locations(unsignalized intersections)are calculated based on Figure } 10-12 of the Highway Capacity Manual(Third Edition, 1997). The distance between the northbound stop bar at Talbot Road S/S Grady Way and the southerly access driveway on Talbot Road S is approximately 710 feet. For roadways with posted speed limits less than 40 mph and competing left-turning traffic, it is common to stripe an 85-foot long reverse curve within the two-way left-turn lane to assign left-turn storage for these movements. This would leave 625 feet for left-turn storage on Talbot Road S between S Grady Way and the southerly access driveway; of which, approximately 525 feet of storage could be designated for northbound left-turning traffic at Talbot Road S/S Grady Way and approximately 100 feet of storage designated for southbound left-turning traffic at the southerly access driveway on Talbot Road S. These storage lengths would accommodate • maximum vehicle queues for these turning movements during the AM and PM peak hours, as • shown in Table 8. Based on the proposed location of the access driveway on S Grady Way (about 530 feet east of the Talbot Road S centerline), this driveway would be located approximately 150 feet west of the Williams Avenue S/S Grady Way intersection. The queuing analysis indicates that the maximum westbound left-turning queue into the site would be accommodated within the available storage length (approximately 100 feet or about 4 vehicles) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, the projected peak hour queuing is expected to be accommodated within the proposed storage areas and no significant queuing impact is anticipated at site access driveways. • +.7 ,pi1-7 bm M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 20 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 Turn Lane Warrant Analyses The need for right-turn deceleration lanes was evaluated at each of the access driveway locations. These lanes are primarily installed to improve operations at intersection approaches by removing right-turning vehicles from the through traffic flow. Figure 910-10, in WSDOT's Design Manual, was used to determine if warrants for right-turn deceleration lanes would be met at site access driveways. Based on the anticipated eastbound through and right-turning volume at the access driveway on S Grady Way, construction of a right-turn deceleration lane is recommended at this driveway. Figure 910-11b in WSDOT's Design Manual recommends that this deceleration lane extend, at a minimum, 350 feet west of this driveway based on a design speed of 45 mph and a turning traffic design speed of 15 mph. In addition,.this lane should be 12 feet wide and include no less than a 50-foot taper within the recommended 350-foot length. Projected peak hour volumes at the access driveways on Talbot Road S would not meet warrants for right-turn deceleration lanes and therefore, these lanes are not recommended. Appendix E contains summaries of the right-turn lane warrant evaluations at site driveways. Frontage Improvements City Code requires that full urban frontage improvements be maintained or constructed along each roadway adjacent to the property. Full frontage improvements already exist along both S Grady Way and Talbot Road S. A portion of the back (southeast) side of the property fronts Benson Road S. Benson Road S is a paved two-lane arterial, with areas of paved and gravel shoulders, and no curb, gutter, or sidewalks adjacent to the project site. No vehicular or pedestrian access is proposed to/from the site from Benson Road S, due to inaccessibility across the steep vegetated slope, wetland area, and ditch/stream system. Pending review of the project by City transportation staff, the applicant is planning to request a waiver from the Board of Public Works to remove the requirement for full urban frontage improvements along Benson Road S. Transit Impacts Transit service in the study area will continue to be provided by King County's Metro Transit. King County's Six-Year Transit Plan may result in service changes in the study area by 2001; however, specific service changes are not known. To provide a conservative (worst-case) analysis of traffic impacts, the trip generation estimates assumed no usage of project-generated trips by transit. Any increase in transit use and reduction in single-occupancy-vehicle (SOV) trips is considered desirable, and would reduce the identified traffic impact proportionally. The location of the existing transit stop on S Grady Way,just east of the Talbot Road S intersection, is anticipated to remain, regardless of the recommended length of the eastbound right-turn lane at the access driveway on S Grady Way. M:100100183IWP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 u"`' : 'l,,`Pa Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 MITIGATION 'MEASURES Mitigation measures for the proposed Southpointe project would consist of off-site and frontage improvements as well as payment of traffic impact fees. A brief description of each mitigation measure is provided in the following sections. Off-Site Improvements It is recommended that the applicant construct an eastbound right-turn deceleration lane at the proposed access driveway on S Grady Way to mitigate its impact on eastbound traffic flow. Without this turn-lane, project traffic would potentially affect the progression of n?� eastbound traffic on S Grady Way, especially during the AM peak hour when the majority of project traffic would be reducing speeds to enter the site at this location. To mitigate potential impacts associated with southbound left-turning traffic volumes at the proposed southerly access driveway on Talbot Road S, it is recommended that the applicant modify the existing center two-way left-turn lane on Talbot Road S between S Grady • Way and this driveway. This modification could include striping or c-curbing to designate vehicle storage for both northbound left-turning traffic at the Talbot Road S/S Grady Way intersection and southbound left-turning traffic at this access driveway. Off-site intersections would operate at the same AM and PM peak hour levels of service with or without the addition of traffic generated by Southpointe. Therefore, since these intersections are projected to operate in the LOS A-LOS E range during the weekday peak hours, the applicant is not required to provide intersection improvements at these locations. Frontage Improvements The applicant is required to provide for full frontage improvements along abutting streets, unless these improvements already exists. Improvements could potentially include curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting along all frontages of the project site. However, due to inaccessibility, no vehicular or pedestrian access is proposed to/from the site from Benson Road S. Pending review of the project by City transportation staff, the applicant is planning to request a waiver from the Board of Public Works to remove the requirement for full urban frontage improvements along Benson Road S. Traffic Impact Fees The City of Renton has an adopted Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. The impact fee is $75 per net new average weekday daily trip (AWDT). The proposed project is anticipated to generate 3,676 "new" average weekday daily trips. The existing on-site building total 83,410 gsf, which have the potential to generate M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000_ "` J L u =Pae 22 Traffic Impact Analysis for Opus Southpointe August 11,2000 approximately 702 weekday daily trips. Detailed trip generation calculations for existing on- site buildings are contained in Appendix F of this report. These trips are credited toward the total trip generation for the Southpointe development. Project-generated traffic less traffic generated by the existing on-site uses results in a net addition of 2,974 weekday daily new trips. This net new average weekday trip generation would result in a traffic impact fee of approximately $223,000. Payment of this fee would mitigate long-term impacts. No adverse or unmitigateable impacts to study intersections, site access driveways, or area street system are expected as a result of the proposed mixed-use development. • • • M:1001001831WP100183R1.DOC ©The Transpo Group,Inc.2000 Page 23 Appendix A Level of Service (LOS) Definitions and Intersection Worksheets AM and PM Peak Hour • .) 4 I-1 JL4)1 LI d Y;:.:.• j Signalized intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average total vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. Vehicle delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of average delay per vehicle during a specified time period (for example, the PM peak hour). Vehicle delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing (i.e., progression of movements through the intersection), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity. Table A-1 shows level of service criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the High- way Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209, 1997). Table A-1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Delay General Description Level of Service Per Vehicle(Seconds) (Signalized Intersections) A Less than 10.0 Free Flow B 10.1 to 20.0 Stable Flow(slight delays) • C 20.1 to 35.0 Stable flow(acceptable delays) D 35.1 to 55.0 Approaching unstable flow(tolerable delay, occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E 55.1 to 80.0 Unstable flow(intolerable delay) F Greater than 80.0 Forced flow(jammed) • { Unsignalized intersection level of service criteria can be further reduced into two inter- section types: all-way stop-controlled and two-way stop-controlled. All-way, stop-controlled intersection level of service is expressed in terms of the average vehicle delay of all of the movements, much like that of a signalized intersection. Two-way, stop-controlled intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of an individual movement(s). This is because the performance of a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is more closely reflected in terms of its individual movements, rather than its performance overall. For this reason, level of service for a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is defined in terms of its individual movements. With this in mind, total average vehicle delay (i.e., average delay of all movements) for a two-way, stop-controlled intersection should be viewed with discretion. Table A-2 shows level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections (both all-way and two-way, stop- controlled). Table A-2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections lLevel of Service Average Total Delay(sec/veh) A 510.0 B >10.0 and s15.0 } C >15.0 and _25.0 „ D >25.0 and .35.0 JLJ., r.,, r, E >35.0 and 550.0 ` ' r� i; f ;' ��� �L� I F 1 >50.0 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings - k' 1 t P `• l w - -• { < 41 t P `► 1 d t ans..Gra rn EEL EaI EEE WEl ldll3l MEL MEL NEI MEE SEL Slit SEE j anp(;rau Lane Configurations R EEL E8Z E88 WRI W5.0 !!!(EE MEL MEZ NM BELL SEI SEE 9 � �"� � �� '�� � �'�''j'+ ) +14+ Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 128 535 677 830 1161 511 1920 163 952 Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.24 0.31 0.28 0.35 0.06 0.19 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 10.0 21.0 59.0 29.0 40.0 35.0 46.6 11.4 23.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.18 0.49 0.24 0.33 0.29 0.39 0.10 0.19 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.40 0.28 0.98 0.94 0.97 0.89 0.63 1.01 Lane Utll.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 54.7 43.8 17.2 45.2 38.1 41.9 31.1 52.3 46.0 • Frt Protected 0.850 0.977 0.944 0.969 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.32 1.00 0.96 1.03 1.00 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 59.9 2.2 0.2 21.6 11.3 31.5 5.5 7.8 31.8 Satd.Flow(prot) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3447 0 1752 4709 0 1719 4762 0 Webster Delay 114.6 46.0 17.5 60.6 61.7 73.5 35.4 61.4 77.7 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.974 0.935 0.964 Webster LOS F D B E E E D E E Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3447 0 1752 4709 0 1719 4762 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 7 18 149 49 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 Offset:73(61%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 110 195 175 750 850 150 455 985 585 95 700 185 Natural Cycle:100 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.90 Heavy Vehicles(%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.95 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:56.4 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% • Adj.Flow(vph) 120 212 190 815 924 163 495 1071 636 103 761 201 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 120 212 190 815 1087 0 495 1707 0 103 962 0 I Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot 1 01 �•02 ai 04 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4WA tz PITfIrn .r'-r. 1iMiSIP'.01' '?'"' 1 t %,u. +s: Permitted Phases 2 4--- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 , 05 06 t 00 `•07 Minimum initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 24.0 38.0 32.0 43.0 0.0 38.0 51.0 0.0 13.0 26.0 0.0 ' Total Split(%) 11% 20% 32% 27% 36% 0% 32% 43% 0% 11% 22% 0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 20.0 34.0 28.0 39.0 34.0 47.0 9.0 22.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag- Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 -' Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report t-- Transpo-JLR ��THETRANS-FF41 - Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 • THETRANS-FF41 t; i'=s.=7 u' 1 • 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings f r < 4\ t p \' 1 d f d 1 t P 4 4 1 I ana Pamir% FELL E$I Ea8 )8IBL WAT Wall NELL Nal Ma BBL Sal SB@ I ane Strain EBL EBI Ma I&BL 188I I&E NEIL biBl LB B L 38I SS$ Lane Configurations Tt r vs) .1p q) f.p ►j ft r Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 48 1019 1156 297 1231 1549 1718 38 228 166 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.02 0.00 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 3.4 35.9 89.5 10.7 43.2 53.6 58.8 2.6 7.8 11.2 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.30 0.75 0.09 0.36 0.45 0.49 0.02 0.07 0.09 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.27 0.11 0.64 0.52 0.86 0.77 0.42 0.35 0.16 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay,dt 57.3 32.0 0.0 52.7 30.0 29.7 24.4 57.9 53.6 1.0 Frt Protected 0.850 0.994 0.976 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.09 1.32 99.00 0.99 1.06 0.96 0.75 0.96 0.84 0.80 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 incr.Delay,d2 4.2 0.4 0.0 4.4 1.6 3.8 1.7 7.4 0.9 0.4 Satd.Flow(prat) 1703 3406 1524 3335 3414 0 3467 3474 0 1752 3505 1568 Webster Delay 66.6 42.8 0.0 56.9 33.3 32.4 20.1 62.9 46.1 1.2 Frt Penn. 0.826 0.993 ' 0.972 0.826 Webster LOS E D A EC C C E ID A Fit Penn. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1703 3406 1481 3335 3414 0 3467 3474 0 1752 3505 1524 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 126 3 30 25 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:10(8%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 20 260 120 180 580 25 1260 1055 205 15 75 25 Natural Cycle:90 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:12 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.63 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.70 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:29.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:C Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 21 274 126 189 611 26 1326 1111 216 16 79 26 Splits and Phases: 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 274 126 189 637 0 1326 1327 0 16 79 26 1 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov C 01 'To'02 1 04 03 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 x1= ®( A IM IN PRIPNVAMEI glatiVAIMMAVAVIIMMAZITA ' Permitted Phases 2 4 i.4 41 t 08 Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Ell c't• '.a P ? ®f CII FF . :'"_C:?"7.MAZOIV; .M- Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) . 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 8.0 28.0 58.0 14.0 34.0 0.0 58.0 70.0 0.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(%) 7% 23% 48% 12% 28% 0% 48% 58% 0% 7% 17% 7% Maximum Green(s) 4.0 24.0 54.0 10.0 30.0 54.0 66.0 4.0 16.0 4.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 - Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ` Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None None l Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Soutbpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 3 Transpo-JLR Page 4 -- THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF4I U c_ (1 - i _-- -_ _.-� _ .._. 4----.. .__-_. ------ _,.. -._ ----- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way B Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2000 Existing Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 5 10 12 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 535 550 20 255 Movement 10 12 'HFR: 582 598 22 277 VHF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 . P hv 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Movements: 13 16 t c Flow: 50 50 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 12.00 12.00 Walk speed: 4.00 4.00 Follow Up Time Calculations: 4 Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t f 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,2E3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows - 399 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 601 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 601 Probability of Queue free St. 0.54 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5E6 approach: Conflicting Flows 939 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 263 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor • 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 . Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Channelized: N Movement Capacity 263 Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8E9 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N - Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 v(vph) 22 139 C m(vph) 263 601 v/c 0.08 0.23 Lane usage for movements 10,11E12 approach: 95% queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 19.9 12.8 L T A L T R L T R LOS C B Approach Delay 13.8 Y N N N N Y N N Y Approach LOS B Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 • • Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: • .,.e-ati 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S - 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings J ano(;rear% EBI ERR 76IBL WEI bIBL LIH3 J ano(;rnriA EBI EBB W131 WBI bl9L bIBE Lane Configurations f f► '' ++ 'i r Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2121 401 3539 312 547 Storage Length(ft) 0 380 120 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.16 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Penn Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 54.8 10.5 90.0 15.7 29.2 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.12 1.00 0.17 0.32 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.39 0.26 0.25 0.49 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 10.8 36.8 0.0 32.1 20.3 Frt Protected 0.994 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.06 0.82 1.00 0.94 0.73 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.7 Satd.Flow(prot) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 12.7 30.8 0.2 30.5 15.6 Frt Penn. 0.994 0.850 Webster LOS B C A C B Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(pens) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 42 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1150 50 150 860 75 255 Natural Cycle:70 Confl.Pads.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.52 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.56 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:10.3 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1211 53 158 905 79 268 Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1264 0 158 905 79 268 s Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov `#f 01 -►e2 r e3 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 a "t s'"�a my t = ` r; � r? "_ - `„',' Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 31 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 48.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 42.0 Total Split(%) 53% 0% 23% 0% 23% 47% Maximum Green(s) 44.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF4I THETRANS-FF4I 1.p _s t 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings 4\ t 1 4/ f 4\ t l r I ann r.rnup EEL EBB. NU N SB S8 S 8 j anP Crnnn ESL EAR NBI !1'$I SSI S88 Lane Configurations 1 r ►) ft ft. Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 • Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 68 510 390 3080 2058 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.67 0.13 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 2.3 18.4 13.1 51.7 35.6 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.31 0.22 0.86 0.59 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.07 0.63 0,78 0.21 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,d1 27.9 0.0 21.3 1.7 5.4 Frt Protected 0.850 0.986 Platoon Factor 0.56 1.00 0.92 0.00 0.31 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 0.1 3.3 2.0 0.2 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3456 0 Webster Delay 16.5 0.1 22.9 2.0 1.9 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.986 Webster LOS B AC A A Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3456 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 35 19 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:5(8%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 10 35 245 2365 390 40 Natural Cycle:80 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.67 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.75 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:3.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 10 35 247 2389 394 40 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 10 35 247 2389 434 0 Turn Type Pm+Ov Prot t 02 at Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 .3l , w£?fir^.k +met: zmi" .xm` r'a3 : ;' iraommern Permitted Phases 4 m5 1 e6 Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 ttft . ...ff,_:,. ; ^y Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 20.0 18.0 18.0 40.0 22.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 30% 30% 67% 37% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 18.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF4I ri =• ,Q";t 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings \ ` Lanes,Volumes,Timings ` f -• / ,- & 4\ t r y 4/ /- -+ 4-- t 4\ t , " 1 4/ Lan- "-riri= EEL Sal EBa WBL WEI 15IHS. NHL b8L WM SHL SEM Sall !am.r;rnn n EBL EBI EBB WRI MI MIME NHLi�IBI NM SBI SBB Lane Configurations if TI, r 11 ft. lj 'fl+ tj f"S► Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 331 885 630 793 1021 215 1232 302 1452 Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 0.22 0.11 0.23 0.16 0.09 0.20 0.14 0.30 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 22.7 30.3 48.0 -28.0 35.6 14.7 29.0 20.7 35.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.25 0.40 0.23 0.30 0.12 0.24 0.17 0.29 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.89 0.86 1.00 0.54 0.72 0.83 0.79 1.03 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 47.1 43.2 32.6 46.0 33.6 50.6 37.6 47.5 41.8 Frt Protected 0.850 0.971 0.942 0.980 Platoon Factor 0.97 1.03 1.00 0.90 1.25 0.98 0.96 1.01 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 20.5 13.0 11.7 31.4 1.9 10.8 4.8 13.2 32.6 Satd.Flow(prot) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3386 0 1752 4699 0 1752 4920 0 Webster Delay 66.4 57.4 44.3 72.8 44.0 60.2 40.7 61.4 74.4 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.968 0.933 0.977 Webster LOS E E D E D E D E E Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3386 0 1752 4699 0 1752 4920 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 5 24 127 24 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:31(26%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 270 740 510 745 415 100 145 590 370 225 1225 185 Natural Cycle:75 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Total Lost Time:9 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.88 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.95 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:59.1 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 287 787 543 793 441 106 154 628 394 239 1303 197 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 287 787 543 793 547 0 154 1022 0 239 1500 0 I Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot c 01 -i 02 03 04 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Al T ry," *mwgi tikelEr'a ..:; 0,1,•:=4 s.;,"rt4•rl" Permitted Phases 2 , 05 F 0S t a8 07 Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 ZIW M0-11.G Ili 114Wie' er'1. .:s g4M ,g ,g Y6,j-:=.t " Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 27.0 32.0 19.0 31.0 36.0 0.0 19.0 34.0 0.0 23.0 38.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 23% 27% 16% 26% 30% 0% 16% 28% 0% 19% 32% 0% Maximum Green(s) 23.0 28.0 15.0 27.0 32.0 15.0 30.0 19.0 34.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag . Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 g 11fi ^'- - TF-r2 li if, .' i, i. 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings -� ti r 4- t 4\ t P ' 1 f' - - , C •-- k" 4\ t P `► f' )ann rIrnlrp EBL EBI EBB I&1BL Mil WW1 BBL M8I MRR BBL BBI BBB I ann(;rnnp EBL EBI EBB. 2018L MI W88 MBL MIM88 BBL BBI BBB Lane Configurations li 'It r ►j't f t )1 +I. ' tt r Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 119 947 842 445 1158 918 1618 60 837 515 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.20 0.21 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.15 0.02 0.21 0.01 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.03 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes .Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 8.1 32.1 64.2 15.7 39.7 32.1 56.2 4.0 28.1 36.2 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.27 0.54 0.13 0.33 0.27 0.47 0.03 0.23 0.30 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.74 0.78 0.81 0.49 0.40 0.32 0.47 0.88 0.12 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 54.4 40.1 11.3 50.7 32.1 36.0 14.7 56.9 44.3 0.0 Frt Protected 0.850 0.998 0.946 0.850 Platoon Factor 0.87 1.46 2.39 0.99 1.07 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 4.8 2.8 2.5 10.4 1.5 0.3 0.1 5.6 10.4 0.1 Satd.Flow(prat) 1770 3539 1583 3400 3498 0 3433 3316 0 1787 3574 1599 Webster Delay 52.4 61.6 29.6 60.8 35.8 34.6 14.5 60.6 53.8 0.1 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.998 0.937 0.826 Webster LOS D EC E D C B E D A Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1539 3400 3498 0 3433 3316 0 1787 3574 1554 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 15 1 122 62 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:58(48%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 65 625 585 320 505 5 325 290 165 25 655 55 Natural Cycle:70 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Total Lost Time:12 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.81 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:41.8 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:D Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 73 702 657 360 567 6 365 326 185 28 736 62 Splits and Phases: 2;S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 73 702 657 360 573 0 365 511 0 28 736 62 I Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov j 0 1 02 1 04 03 r =-f ', ;`'tea =:.<..VM, j s's . ::.'f.,,2.l?). .2441r '_; Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 _+ Mr Permitted Phases 2 4 ♦"08 y 07 t Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 fEr .r ;.i',fi] ','=�"feA:,v�4 r �gr-,,, ,. r 8fr »p W5411;,;V, W r. ;.,F_,; Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 34.0 35.0 19.0 40.0 0.0 35.0 58.0 0.0 9.0 32.0 13.0 Total Split(%) 11% 28% 29% 16% 33% 0% 29% 48% 0% 8% 27% 11% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 30.0 31.0 15.0 36.0 31.0 54.0 5.0 28.0 9.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag' Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) •0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 3 Transpo-JLR Page 4 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF4I RCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way &Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2000 Existing Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 5 10 12 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Volume: 800 430 40 545 Critical Gap Calculations: HFR: 870 467 43 592 Movement 10 12 PRF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.7 0.0 t c,T: Movements: 13 16 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Flow: 50 50 t c Lane width: 12.00 12.00 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Walk speed: 4.00 4.00 Follow Up Time Calculations: % Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 S of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t E 3.5 3.3 S of vehicles: Northbound 0 k of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 334 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 662 • Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 662 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.11 Grade: 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 952 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 257 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor ... 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Channelized: N Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Grads: 0.00 Movement Capacity 257 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0,00 v(vph) 43 296 C m(vph) 257 662 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 a v/c 0.17 0.45 pproach: 95t queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 21.8 14.8 L T R L T R L T R LOS C B Y N N N N y N N Y Approach Delay 15.7 Approach LOS C Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: U i!_''..z. l' .• ; __' =':✓ Il ,1'.V , _1 =�R i• 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings - 1 C t- 4\ P J anp Group FRT FRR )&131. MI NHL NRE J ane r;rrsun MI FRR WAl MI KEIL pig$ Lane Configurations +is 1111 ft ) r Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2133 610 3539 201 545 Storage Length(ft) 0 140 120 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.11 0.49 0.03 0.08 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 54.9 16.0 90.0 10.1 29.1 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.18 1.00 0.11 0.32 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 - 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.63 0.49 0.27 0.24 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 10.7 34.3 0.0 36.5 14.9 Frt Protected 0.988 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.79 0.90 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.2 2.2 0.5 0.7 0.2 Satd.Flow(prot) 3497 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 11.9 33.7 0.5 29.6 13.7 Frt Perm. 0.988 0.850 Webster LOS B C A C B Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3497 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 41 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:4(4%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1085 90 360 1615 50 120 Natural Cycle:70 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 • Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.55 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.58 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:9.0 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) '• 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1167 97 387 1737 54 129 . Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1264 0 387 1737 54 129 Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov 0 01 -+ a 02 Y 03 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 .r'•Z i tr' 1®M^ig' .i;` rfiYalt .ag.•r' rs .t,RESI p'1 ry ft �?`"s.•t:1i Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 31 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0- 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 46.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 44.0 Total Split(%) 51% 0% 24% 0% 24% 49% Maximum Green(s) 42.0 18.0 18.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 - THETRANS-FF41 LtIvj _ 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Existing,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings t 4\ t 4 *1 -A '\ t l 1 1-(r""S. EDL ERR NEL NEI ' SHI SES J on f;rnuR ESL ERR NEL NaI Slit EBB Lane Configurations II r ►) 44 41. Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 176 373 149 2865 2387 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.25 0.59 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 5.9 13.9 5.0 48.1 40.1 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.23 0.08 0.80 0.67 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.94 0.65 0.31 0.88 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,d1 25.2 22.5 26.6 1.6 8.1 Frt Protected 0.850 0.999 Platoon Factor 0.63 0.87 1.00 1.40 0.94 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 32.2 9.8 0.3 4.0 Satd.Flow(prof)" 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Webster Delay 16.9 51.7 36.4 2.5 11.5 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.999 Webster LOS BDD A B Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 3 2 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:2(3%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT.Start of Green Volume(vph) 55 345 95 875 2050 20 Natural Cycle:90 Confi.Pads.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Total Lost Time:6 " Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.81 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.90 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:14.0 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 56 352 97 893 2092 20 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 56 352 97 893 2112 0 Turn Type Pm+Ov Prot t 02 "e 04 Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 � a- ""'' Permitted Phases 4 05 1 06 Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 t461 "M:u Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 40.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 13% 13% 67% 53% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 4.0 4.0 36.0 28.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) • 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF4I THETRANS-FF4I • 1 LL..._ ._ .. - . • 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings--► C f- k' 4\ t P `► ` /1 -' - -+ ♦ ♦ '- \ t , \, 1 1 J ant,.r;rnun EBL EBI EBB (BI t&1SB 10111E IC 11131. t1 I NEB SBL SBI SEB 1 am arniip, EBL EBI EBB. Wai =I 10111E LIEL Mal EBB. SEL Sat SEE Lane Configurations 1 TT r )1TA 1TT4 ) ?ft. Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 128 484 654 858 1132 511 1958 163 991 Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.24 0.32 0.29 0.35 0.06 0.20 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Penn 0.05 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 10.0 19.0 57.0 30.0 39.0 35.0 47.6 11.4 24.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.48 0.25 0.33 0.29 0.40 0.10 0.20 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.45 0.30 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.89 0.63 0.99 Lane Utll.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 54.7 45.7 18.5 44.5 39.4 42.3 30.6 52.3 45.4 Frt Protected 0.850 0.977 0.944 0.968 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.29 1.00 0.96 1.03 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 59.9 3.0 0.3 18.3 17.6 36.4 5.3 7.8 26.7 Satd.Flow(prat) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3447 0 1752 4709 0 1719 4757 0 Webster Delay 114.6 48.7 18.8 57.1 68.5 78.7 34.8 61.4 72.2 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.974 0.935 0.963 Webster LOS F D B E E E C E E Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3447 0 1752 4709 0 1719 4757 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 7 18 150 50 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:73(61%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 110 200 180 765 865 155 465 1005 595 95 715 190 Natural Cycle:100 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.91 Heavy Vehicles(%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.96 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:56.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 120 217 196 832 940 168 505 1092 647 103 777 207 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 120 217 196 832 1108 0 505 1739 0 103 984 0 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot I(01 -►02 t n3 4, n4 " Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 'r'' .' w'' ^tr,:g' ) t�� wIIfoR ',.eF s-` i af. " :s;.rr; `' '... ;,,r �.., � i`aGt.. x Permitted Phases 2 �-- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 r' • �,n1 ,yam y °7 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 22.0 38.0 33.0 42.0 0.0 38.0 52.0 0.0 13.0 27.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 11% 18% 32% 28% 35% 0% 32% 43% 0% 11% 23% 0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 18.0 34.0 29.0 38.0 34.0 48.0 9.0 23.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag ' Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 r- 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings l Z c 1 .t .{1 t o \* 1 -' - t 1 1 A \► 1 r 1 an,.finnan EBL EBI EBB 15/BL WBI WBB NHL NBI hum BBL SBI EBB 1 an,.(;rniin EBL EBI EBB 15WBL WB.I 151B11 BBL NBI UBE EBL SEI BBB Lane Configurations 1 ft j 'pi 44 'II fl. 1) TT If Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 48 968 1147 320 1203 1577 1747 38 228 164 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.02 0.00 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 3.4 34.1 88.7 11.5 42.2 54.6 59.8 2.6 7.8 11.2 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.28 0.74 0.10 0.35 0.46 0.50 0.02 0.07 0.09 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.29 0.11 0.61 0.54 0.86 0.77 0.42 0.35 0.16 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 57.3 33.5 0.0 52.1 30.9 29.2 23.9 57.9 53.6 2.9 Frt Protected 0.850 0.994 0.976 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.10 1.32 99.00 0.99 1.08 0.96 0.75 0.96 0.84 0.80 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 4.1 0.5 0.0 3.3 1.7 3.8 1.7 7.4 0.9 0.5 Satd.Flow(prat) 1703 3406 1524 3335 3414 0 3467 3474 0 1752 3505 1568 Webster Delay 67.1 44.6 0.0 54.9 35.0 31.8 19.6 62.9 46.1 2.8 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.993 0.972 0.826 Webster LOS E D A D D C B E D A Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1703 3406 1481 3335 3414 0 3467 3474 0 1752 3505 1524 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 126 3 31 23 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:10(8%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 20 265 120 185 590 25 1285 1075 210 15 75 25 Natural Cycle:90 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:12 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.64 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.71 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:29.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:C Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 21 279 126 195 621 26 1353 1132 221 16 79 26 Splits and Phases: 2:S Grad Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 279 126 195 647 0 1353 1353 0 16 79 26 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov '`01 -►02 1 04 3 xri Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 `LWOW - � -, 41,4 s��: dt ;AAireigge t' Permitted Phases 2 4 0 4- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 re 06 r m t 09 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 8.0 26.0 59.0 15.0 33.0 0.0 59.0 71.0 0.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(%) 7% 22% 49% 13% 28% 0% 49% 59% 0% 7% 17% 7% Maximum Green(s) 4.0 22.0 55.0 11.0 29.0 55.0 67.0 4.0 16.0 4.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 3 Transpo-JLR Page 4 -THETRANS-FF41 __ THETRANS-FF4I r u's4... W1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way & Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 Without-Project Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 5 10 12 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 545 560 20 260 Movement 10 12 HFR: 592 609 22 283 PHF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.7 0.0 t C,T: Movements: 13 16 1 stage 0.00 0.00 ' t c Flow: 50 50 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 12.00 12.00 Walk speed: 4.00 4,00 Follow Up Time Calculations: I Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t f 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane'usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 404 • L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 596 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 596 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.53 Grade: 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 955 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 256 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Adj, Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Channelized: N Movement Capacity 256 Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 v(vph) 22 141 C m(vph) 256 596 v/c 0.08 0.24 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: 95% queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 20.3 12.9 L T R L T R L T R LOS C B • Approach Delay 13.9 Y N N N N Y N N Y Approach LOS B Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: • ,�` . 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings --► c 4-- 4\ /* 1 c t-- 4\ P J amp GrnnR Ell Egg WRI WRT NHL tali J anp srnun Eat Egg 1W1.13L Mil NB1_ tag Lane Configurations ft/ ►n ff i" Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2110 404 3539 316 550 Storage Length(ft) 0 380 120 0 • v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 0.05 0.26 0.04 0.16 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s), 54.5 10.6 90.0 15.9 29.5 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.12 1.00 0.18 0.33 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.40 0.26 0.25 0.50 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,dl 11.1 36.7 0.0 31.9 20.5 Frt Protected 0.994 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.07 0.82 1.00 0.94 0.73 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.7 Satd.Flow(prat) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 13.2 30.9 0.2 30.5 15.7 Frt Perm. 0.994 0.850 Webster LOS B C A C B Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 39 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1175 50 155 875 75 260 Natural Cycle:70 Conti.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.53 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.57 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:10.6 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1237 53 163 921 79 274 Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1290 0 163 921 79 274 Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov 0 of -►02 03 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 }Ex.r �` r �tTt' t ? rn + `f? Ml� i 1ya� � Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 3 1 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 48.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 42.0 Total Split(%) 53% 0% 23% 0% 23% 47% Maximum Green(s) 44.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS:FF41 THETRANS-FF4I 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings 4\ t 4/ f 4\ t j ane(;mull MI- ERR I:1BL NBI SBI SBEL J ane l;rniin ESL EB$ UHL RBI SBI EBB. Lane Configurations 'I r ) T4' +r1+ Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 68 512 393 3080 2052 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.68 0.13 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 , Act Effct Green(s) 2.3 18.5 13.2 51.7 35.5 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.31 0.22 0.86 0.59 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.07 0.64 0.79 0.22 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,d1 27.9 0.0 21.3 1.8 5.5 Frt Protected 0.850 0.986 Platoon Factor 0.56 1.00 0.92 0.00 0.38 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 0.1 3.6 2.2 0.2 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3456 0 Webster Delay 16.5 0.1 23.2 2.2 2.3 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.986 Webster LOS B A C A A Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3456 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 35. 18 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:5(8%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 10 35 250 2410 400 40 Natural Cycle:80 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical via Ratios:0.69 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.76 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:3.9 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 10 35 253 2434 404 40 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 10 35 253 2434 444 0 Turn Type Pm+Ov Prot t m2 e4 Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 4 �^k . ` `' ` ; ° . `<_„-''z . :' ',,,,,I Permitted Phases 4 I Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 t 05 A. `I' 08 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.084 n t• '" e1 Ij r-. , 3 �O �1„- ,,,- Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 20.0 18.0 18.0 40.0 22.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 30% 30% 67% 37% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 18.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag • Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 c r.; 1:2 _ THETRANS-FF4I rya . - • , , _ 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings I. > r •- 4\ t P ti 1 . -• r k- 4\ t /* `► 1 d J ano(soup EEL EBI Ma WSJ- 10E1 Wall NHL Nil NM MIL SRI SEJ3 1 ano r;rnup ELL EEI all MIL 101a1 Wa8 NaL NW al.N Sal Sala Lane Configurations 1 44 j vi tr. ' HI) '1 4.0 Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 342 865 630 793 982 225 1240 310 1452 Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 0.23 0.11 0.24 0.16 0.09 0.20 0.14 0.31 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Penn 0.24 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 23.4 29.6 48.0 28.0 34.2 15.4 29.2 21.2 35.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.25 0.40 0.23 0.29 0.13 0.24 0.18 0.29 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.93 0.88 1.02 0.57 0.71 0.84 0.79 1.06 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 46.6 44.1 32.9 46.0 35.0 50.2 37.6 47.3 41.8 Frt Protected 0.850 0.971 0.942 0.980 Platoon Factor 0.97 1.04 1.00 0.89 1.37 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 18.6 17.5 13.1 36.5 2.3 10.1 5.1 12.8 39.6 Satd.Flow(prot) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3389 0 1752 4699 0 1752 4920 0 Webster Delay 63.7 63.2 46.1 77.6 50.0 58.7 41.2 60.3 81.4 Frt Penn. 0.850 0.967 0.933 0.977 Webster LOS E E D E D E D E F Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3389 0 1752 4699 0 1752 4920 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 5 23 127 24 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:31(26%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 275 755 520 760 425 100 150 600 375 230 1250 190 Natural Cycle:90 Conti.Pads.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Total Lost Time:9 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.91 _ Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.98 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:63.0 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 293 803 553 809 452 106 160 638 399 245 1330 202 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 293 803 553 809 558 0 160 1037 0 245 1532 0 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 C.o1 02 03 04 L�,crtw'" aPXCkRsP? x "2*' a5....a;lr p`4iFN ; zy ?KT ,a> 3t m or 4;.: Permitted Phases 2 05 I-- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 J s-i 0; ' r, 6,,'#, ,44;ems , tv s 8 .7': : _ r �7 t-.xM-;' Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 28.0 31.0 20.0 31.0 34.0 0.0 20.0 34.0 0.0 24.0 38.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 23% 26% 17% 26% 28% 0% 17% 28% 0% 20% 32% 0% Maximum Green(s) 24.0 27.0 16.0 27.0 30.0 16.0 30.0 20.0 34.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLRTe `s' c 3+ Pa e I THETRANS-FF41 tz ?j g Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 ..'G 4.a\.>J Li •..I]y t.LL�.:.,.J!I C' P ''' 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings ti r +- t q t t ti 1 -' . s ! ♦' k• 4\ t P ti 1 d )anp(;rnnp EEL EEI E 2 WEt WAT 7i]IEB NELL NRT NEE. EEL MI MR 1 ant Grnun EEL EELI EEl3 WELL 101HI WEB NW.. MI NaE EEL SEI SEE Lane Configurations '1 ft r vi tr. vi ti. ' f t r Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 119 947 832 445 1158 895 1619 60 861 525 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.20 0.21 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.15 0.02 0.21 0.01 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.03 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 8.1 32.1 63.4 15.7 39.7 31.3 56.2 4.0 28.9 37.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.27 0.53 0.13 0.33 0.26 0.47 0.03 0.24 0.31 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.76 0.80 0.82 0.51 0.41 0.32 0.47 0.87 0.12 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay.d1 54.4 40.4 11.9 50.8 32.2 36.7 14.7 56.9 43.8 0.0 Frt Protected 0.850 0,998 0.945 0.850 Platoon Factor 0.87 1.47 2.47 0.99 1.07 0.96 0.98 0.97 ' 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 4.5 2.8 2.8 11.5 1.6 0.3 0.1 5.6 9.8 0.1 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 3400 3498 0 3433 3313 0 1787 3574 1599 Webster Delay 52.0 62.3 32.2 62.0 36.0 35.5 14.5 60.6 52.6 0.1 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.998 0.936 0.826 Webster LOS D EC E D D B E D A Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1539 3400 3498 0 3433 3313 0 1787 3574 1554 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 15 1 126 62 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:58(48%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 65 640 595 325 515 5 330 295 170 25 670 55 Natural Cycle:70 Confi.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Total Lost Time:12 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.74 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.83 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:42.4 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:D Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 73 719 669 365 579 6 371 331 191 28 753 62 Splits and Phases: 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 73 719 669 365 585 0 371 522 0 28 753 62 1 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov C 01 02 04 t 03 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 fa ' Mgiii c'iMr.i6 ry>1 rant i? -'.ea4?=-ir" z:=?''''_ntaS kngekke"a rfanWil: Permitted Phases .2 4 0 05 ~0S "m7 t 08 Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 zk'V®Y.larPATAMtar ;nwr.:'ial€r s',• .; .s_•,,FS',9 i1.. ., +.i-" rK5V3V•)'- Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 34.0 34.0 19.0 40.0 0.0 34.0 58.0 0.0 9.0 33.0 13.0 Total Split(%) 11% 28% 28% 16% 33% 0% 28% 48%' 0% 8% 28% 11% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 36.0 30.0 54.0 5.0 29.0 9.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coo-rd "None None Coord None None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) .z. Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR j;, Page 3 Transpo-JLR Page 4 THETRANS-FF41 ' ' THETRANS-FF41 f HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.10 Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Tranepo-JI,R Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way a Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 Without-Project Time Period: PM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: • Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 5 10 12 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 815 440 40 555 Movement 10 12 HFR: 886 478 43 603 PHF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0,2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0,7 0,0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Movements: 13 16 t c Flow: 50 50 • 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 12.00 12.00 Walk speed: 4.00 4.00 Follow Up Time Calculations: t Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t E,HV 1.0 1.0 P 02 Flared approach Movements: t hv 0.f 3..5 0. .5 5 3..33 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations . Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 339 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 657 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 657 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.08 Grade: O.o0 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 971 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 250 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Adj. imp Factor. 1.00 Channelized: N Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Grade: 0.00 Movement Capacity 250 Lane usage for movements 7,869 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0,00 v(vph) 43 302 C m(vph) 250 657 v/c 0.17 0.46 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: 95t queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 22.4 15.1 L T R L T R L T R LOS C C Approach Delay 16.0 Y N N N N Y N N Y Approach LOS C Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: =�1" t • 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings _.' ', ,`' +- 4\ t --► - , 4-- 4\ P J ana A mita ERI gag 161.BL Mil NHL MIR J ana[;rnun EBI EBR WRI WRT NELL U .R Lane Configurations 1''r4 1111 ft fi r Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2151 599 3539 199 541 Storage Length(ft) 0 380 120 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 0.11 0.50 0.03 0.08 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Penn Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 55.3 15.7 90.0 10.0 28.7 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.17 1.00 0.11 0.32 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.65 0.50 0.27 0.24 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 10.6 34.6 0.0 36.6 14.4 Frt Protected 0.989 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.03 0.94 1.00 0.81 0.93 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.2 2.6 0.5 0.7 0.2 Satd.Flow(prot) 3500 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 12.1 35.1 0.5 30.4 13.5 Frt Perm. 0.989 0.850 Webster LOS B D A CB Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3500 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 45 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:4(4%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1105 90 365 1645 50 120 Natural Cycle:70 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.55 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.59 Bus Blockages(#/hr) . 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:9.3 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1188 97 392 1769 54 129 Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1285 0 392 1769 54 129 Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov irf 01 -+o2 e3 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 -k:> x" .�IDESI rzi ' k1M, 1". k a r;;e -- ' : K''.it' Imoc.--7MVITMWMAMBil Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 3 1 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 48.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 42.0 Total Split(%) 53% 0% 23% 0% 23% 47% Maximum Green(s) 44.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead • Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR _ _ Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 1-11 r, r -•. . -};' _ ,-st �.i1•r- L) L u 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 Without-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings t ti 4\ t -' 4\ t 't -' 1annf:rnuR EEL EBB NHL NEI BBL BEM 1 ant.RrnuR EEL EBB NEL NEI SEI BBB Lane Configurations ►) i~ ' f. fr. Walk Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 176 372 149 2865 2387 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.26 0.60 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 5.9 13.9 5.0 48.1 40.1 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.23 0.08 0.80 0.67 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.96 0.65 0.32 0.90 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,d1 25.2 22.6 26.6 1.6 8.3 Frt Protected 0.850 0.999 Platoon Factor 0.63 0.87 1.00 1.41 0.99 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 35.7 9.8 0.3 4.6 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Webster Delay 16.9 55.4 36.4 2.5 12.8 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.999 Webster LOS BED A B Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(pens) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 2 2 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:2(3%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 55 350 95 895 2090 20 Natural Cycle:90 Conti.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.83 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.92 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:15.1 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 56 357 97 913 2133 20 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 56 357 97 913 2153 0 Turn Type Pm+Ov Prot t 02 04 Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 40M '- "','emu '.,gr' 3 S astor`..,k,t. Permitted Phases 4 Iy Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 -t.e5...;,.,<_. roti s- Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 :a„Fra.., ;41i." irf %l rr �'» TAIr' " ` '-`r , Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 40.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 13% 13% 67% 53% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 4.0 4.0 36.0 28.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode . None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I J LR Pa e 2 THETRANS-FF4I THETRANS-FF41 8 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings f -. C &. 4 t t ti 4 4/ J C I-- 4\ t i " 4 r ana ramp, E8L EEI ELM WEI WEI )t M 11EL NRT NEB EEL EEI .RR )ane(;rnun EEL EB.I EE8 WS.L WAT WEE f18L NEI bL EEL BEI aal3 Lane Configurations ' ft r ►j1) 11. +ft. ) ft Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 128 459 643 887 1131 511 2055 129 991. Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.25 0.32 0.29 0.40 0.07 0.20 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 10.0 18.0 56.0 31.0 39.0 35.0 50.0 9.0 24.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.15 0.47 0.26 0.33 0.29 0.42 0.08 0.20 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.52 0.30 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.95 0.96 0.99 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 54.7 47.0 19.1 44.0 39.5 42.3 30.1 55.3 45.4 Frt Protected 0.850 0.977 0.934 0.968 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 'Incr.Delay,d2 59.9 4.1 0.3 17.8 18.8 36.4 10.1 66.9 26.7 Satd.Flow(prot) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3444 0 1752 4648 0 1719 4757 0 Webster Delay 114.6 51.1 19.4 55.2 68.0 78.7 40.3 122.3 72.2 Frt Penn. 0.850 0.973 0.923 0.963 Webster LOS F D B E E E D F E Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1530 3059 1369 3433 3444 0 1752 4648 0 1719 4757 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 7 18 202 50 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:73(61%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 110 219 180 791 868 157 465 1005 788 114 715 190 Natural Cycle:100 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.92 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 18% 18% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% . 3% 5% 5% 5% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.97 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:58.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 120 238 196 860 943 171 505 1092 857 124 777 207 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 120 238 196 860 1114 0 505 1949 0 124 984 0 I Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot t<0 7,...m2 t 03 4 m4 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 UOZ' '"`1 ' A`` ,VA , ' 'TWA `, Permitted Phases 2 11-- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 1O A•;:1 �T MOVA �;:: � r ftVi f: iyi,,, Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 21.0 38.0 34.0 42.0 0.0 38.0 53.0 0.0 12.0 27.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 11% 18% 32% 28% 35% 0% 32% 44% 0% 10% 23% 0% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 17.0 34.0 30.0 38.0 34.0 49.0 8.0 23.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) ._`;7 Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF4I LJJ1 r-1 ., 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 8/4/2000 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 8/4/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings f -• > C 4- & 4\ t , ti 4 4/ - . * c t 4\ t /* ti 4 r J anp nrniip EHL EHI EMI 3tifL WBT Wall f1HL NRT i19& SHL 5.51 SRR J anp r:rnnn EHL Eat ES13 WHL Hat 161.13 NHL. AIBI RISE ,SlL SSI SIR Lane Configurations I I.+ r vi Tt, vi +1. 1 +T r Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 48 1022 1168 278 1214 1563 1694 58 231 164 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.14 0.07 0.06 0.19 0.40 0.39 0.02 0.02 0.00 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 3.4 36.0 90.1 10.0 42.6 54.1 58.0 4.0 7.9 11.3 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.30 0.75 0.08 0.36 0.45 0.48 0.03 0.07 0.09 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.15 0.72 0.53 0.89 0.80 0.55 0.36 0.16 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 57.3 34.1 0.3 53.6 30.6 30.1 25.5 57.1 53.6 4.8 Frt Protected 0.850 0.994 0.975 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.13 1.35 2.91 1.00 1.14 0.92 0.70 0.97 0.84 0.82 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 3.0 0.7 0.0 8.6 1.7 5.2 2.3 10.9 1.0 0.5 Satd.Flow(prat) 1703 3406 1524 3335 3414 0 3467 3471 0 1752 3505 1568 Webster Delay 67.7 46.9 0.9 62.2 36.5 32.8 20.1 66.0 46.2 4.4 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.993 0.971 0.826 Webster LOS E D A E D C C E D A Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1703 3406 1481 3335 3414 0 3467 3471 0 1752 3505 1524 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 147 3 32 21 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:10(8%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 20 450 166 190 590 25 1316 1078 214 30 79 25 Natural Cycle:90 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:9 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.66 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.71 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:31.5 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:C Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 21 474 175 200 621 26 1385 1135 225 32 83 26 Splits and Phases: 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 21 474 175 200 647 0 1385 1360 0 32 83 26 `m1 �►02 4 a4 3 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 ��' Permitted Phases 2 l 8 t Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 :YARN ryilee�§y i x.;�,r�; B'rin ;r 115 ;IM t ,Mt V M SJ:; Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 8.0 27.0 60.0 13.0 32.0 0.0 60.0 71.0 0.0 9.0 20.0 8.0 • Total Split(%) 7% 23% 50% 11% 27% 0% 50% 59% 0% 8% 17% 7% . Maximum Green(s) 4.0 23.0 56.0 9.0 28.0 56.0 67.0 5.0 16.0 4.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 HCS: Unaignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way & Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. _ Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 5 10 12 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 558 637 20 279 Movement 10 12 SFR: 607 692 22 303 PHF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Movements: 13 16 t c Flow: 50 50 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 12.00 12.00 Walk speed: 4.00 4.00 Follow Up Time Calculations: % Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 • # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P Flared approach Movements: t by 0.f 3..5 0..3 t 5 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows . 446 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 560 • Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 560 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.46 Grade: 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 1046 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 224 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Channelized: N Movement Capacity 224 Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 v(vph) 22 152 C m(vph) 224 560 v/c 0.10 0.27 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: 95t queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 22.8 13.8 L T A L T R L T R LOS C S Approach Delay 14.9 Y N N N N Y N N Y Approach LOS B Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: �suuL�•_, :,.2.1;J-Iii `':'LJL_,L_.J 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings --0' ` r '- 4\ P . -0' `• f `- \ l J amp r;rnmp EBI EBR WBi INEU NBL NB$ J anp•r;rnup EBI EBR WBl W I NBL NB$ Lane Configurations ors 115 4T 1 r Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2110 404 3539 316 550 Storage Length(ft) 0 380 120 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 0.05 0.28 0.06 0.16 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 54.5 10.6 90.0 15.9 29.5 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.12 1.00 0.18 0.33 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.40 0.28 0.31 0.50 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 11.2 36.7 0.0 32.3 20.6 Fri Protected 0.994 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.07 0.82 1.00 0.94 0.73 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 incr.Delay,d2 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.7 Satd.Flow(prat) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 13.3 30.9 0.2 31.1 15.8 Fri Perm. 0.994 0.850 Webster LOS B C A C B Fit Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3484 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 38 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1183 52 155 933 94 260 Natural Cycle:70 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.54 . Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.58 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:10.6 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1245 55 183 982 99 274 Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way 8 Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1300 0 163 982 99 274 Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov 4 01 02 4\1+03 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 PAMIV'fz:kMIES i`rI A-An '1a i*7 -h MOR M _'IEN hjE" a ,,,,,MBISII Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 3 1 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 48.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 42.0 Total Split(%) 53% 0% 23% 0% 23% 47% Maximum Green(s) 44.0 17.0 17.0 . Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) . 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 „lL�a L1 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,AM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings l 1 t 4/ }' 1 t 4' r J anp ArnirR EBL EBB IIBL NU Sal MB J ane t;rnir EBL EBB EMI. t BI SBI S.D.B Lane Configurations i r ) ++ +T. Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 68 512 393 3080 2054 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.69 0.13 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Penn 0.01 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50. 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 2.3 18.5 13.2 51.7 35.5 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.31 0.22 0.86 0.59 Turning Speed(mph) 15. 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.07 0.64 0.80 0.22 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,d1 27.9 0.0 21.3 1.9 5.5 Frt Protected 0.850 0.987 Platoon Factor 0.56 1.00 0.92 0.00 0.41 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 0.1 3.6 2.3 0.2 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3459 0 Webster Delay 16.5 0.1 23.2 2.3 2.5 Frt Penn. 0.850 0.987 Webster LOS B A C A A Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 1583 1787 3574 3459 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 35 18 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:5(8%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 10 35 250 2449 405 40 Natural Cycle:90 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.70 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.78 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:4.0 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 10 35 253 2474 409 40 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 10 35 253 2474 449 0 Tuo Type Pm+Ov Prot I e2 -t 04 Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 05 108 Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 ;/,,:;;,�.� , .r_•r Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 , Total Split(s) 20.0 18.0 18.0 40.0 22.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 30% 30% 67% 37% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 18.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s). 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page I Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 - THETRANS-FF4I i- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way &Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 4 5 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 549 200 91 825 9 Movement 4 9 HFR: 610 222 101 917 10 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,baee 4.1 6.9 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 t C,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Movements: t c Flow: 1 stage 4.1 6.9 Lane width: Walk speed: Follow Up Time Calculations: t Blockage: Movement 4 9 Median Type: None t £,base 2.2 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t f 2.2 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and'capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 305 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 691 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N Y Movement Capacity 691 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 832 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 796 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 796 Y N N N Y N N Y N Probability of Queue free St. - 0.87 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N Y N N N N N N v(vph) 101 10 Channelized: N C m(vph) 796 691 Grade: 0.00 v/c 0.13 0.01 95t queue length Control Delay 10.2 10.3 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: LOS B B Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Approach Delay 10.3 L T R L T R L T R Approach LOS B N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 • Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: • • HCS: Uneignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles; 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Tranepo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: Talbot Rd S &North Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 5 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 2447 19 495 11 Movement 9 HFR: 2719 21 550 12 PRP: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,base 6.9 PHV: 0.02 0,02 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2,0 P by 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 t c,T: Movements: 1 stage 0.00 t c Flow: 1 stage 6.9 Lane width: Walk speed: Follow Up Time Calculations: t Blockage: Movement 9 Median Type: None t f,base 3.3 H of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 P Flared approach Movements: t by 0. 3 t f 3..3 k of vehicles: Eastbound 0 N of vehicles: Westbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 1370 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 136 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y Y N N N Movement Capacity 136 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N v(vph) 12 Grade: 0.00 C m(vph) 136 v/c 0.09 95% queue length Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Control Delay 34.0 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 LOS D L T R L T R L T R Approach Delay 34.0 Approach LOS D N N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: . • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: Talbot Rd S & South Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: AM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: - Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 2439 20 55 440 5 27 Movement 4 7 9 HFR: 2710 22 61 489 6 30 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t- c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movements: 2 stage 0.00 1.00 0.00 Flow: t c 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 2 stage 4.1 5.8 6.9 Walk speed: i Blockage: Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 Median Type: TWLTL it of vehicles: 9 t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 Flared approach Movements: t hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Conflicting Plows 1366 Potential Capacity 137 N Y N N Y Y N N N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 137 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.78 Grade: 0.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 2732 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 145 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Y N N N Y N N Y N Movement Capacity 145 Probability of Queue free St. 0.58 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,86,9 approach: Worksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Step 3: TH from Minor St. B 11 L T R L T R L T R Part 1- First Stage Y N N • N N Y N N N Conflicting Flows 2721 611 Potential Capacity 45 487 Channelized: N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Grade: 0.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.58 Movement Capacity 45 282 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Part 2- Second Stage N N N N N N N N N Conflicting Flows 611 2732 Potential Capacity 487 44 Channelized: N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Grade: 0.00 - Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.58 1.00 Movement Capacity 282 44 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 3332 3343 Potential Capacity 8 8 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.58 0.58 Movement Capacity 5 5 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.99 0.99 y 0.14 -12.78 C t 44 0 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.00 Worksheet 7b - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 2721 611 Potential Capacity 35 510 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding event 1.00 0.58 Movement Capacity 35 295 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 367 1355 Potential Capacity 671 209 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.58 0.78 Movement Capacity 388 163 Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 3088 1966 Potential Capacity 9 56 ' Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.00 0.58 Maj. L. Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.00 0.67 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 0.52 Movement Capacity 0 29 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.99 0.99 y C t 0.09 3.67 35 101 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 61 I 6 30 II C m(vph) 145 35 137 v/c 0.42 0.16 0.22 95t queue length Control Delay 46.9 125.6 38.5 LOS E F E Approach Delay 52.1 Approach LOS F l,R 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings ` / -0Lanes,Volumes,Timings f --► ♦ • '- k 4\ t • t `► -' > • ♦ •/ '- 4\ t P `► 4/ d am l rnu(1 EEL EBI EBB 1]/BL NlRT 16 I NBL NRT NEB. SB Sa L l saa d ana(;rniir EEL Eat OM WHI k118i 10fai3 NHL NBI Nall BBL SRI Sa$ Lane Configurations If f+ V ►1 Tp 11 +4t) '1 ++T4 Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 342 835 603 907 1067 210 1240 267 1370 Storage Length(ft) 400 0 500 0 200 0 300 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 0.23 0.11 0.29 0.17 0.09 0.21 0.14 0.31 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 23.4 28.6 46.0 32.0 37.2 14.4 29.1 18.3 33.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.24 0.38 0.27 0.31 0.12 0.24 0.15 0.28 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.97 0.92 1.09 0.56 0.76 0.88 0.93 1.12 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay,d1 46.6 45.3 35.0 44.0 32.7 51.1 37.8 50.2 42.8 Frt Protected 0.850 0.969 0.938 0.980 Platoon Factor 0.97 1.01 1.00 0.95 1.52 0.99 0.98 1.01 1.00 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 18.6 24.9 18.8 57.3 1.9 15.0 7.1 36.1 63.6 Satd.Flow(prat) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3379 0 1752 4673 0 1752 4920 0 Webster Delay 63.7 70.7 53.8 99.3 51.8 65.5 44.2 86.6 106.4 Frt Penn. 0.850 0.964 0.928 0.977 Webster LOS E E D F D E D F F Fit Penn. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,950 Satd.Flow(peen) 1752 3505 1568 3400 3379 0 1752 4673 0 1752 4920 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 3 28 141 23 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:31(26%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT.Start of Green Volume(vph) 275 762 520 932 443 117 150 600 420 233 1250 190 Natural Cycle;100 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Total Lost Time;9 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.96 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Intersection v/c Ratio:1.04 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:76.2 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:E Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 293 811 553 991 471 124 160 638 447 248 1330 202 Splits and Phases: 1:S Grady Way&Rainier Ave S(SR 167) Lane Group Flow(vph) 293 811 553 991 595 0 160 1085 0 248 1532 0 / Tuo Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot ♦ 01 .'►02 03 04 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 SAMMTW (r.70 s 2W+ "' s.arr § 1Wit~- ;;:KRXIV1 1*--M re Njr'I:si Permitted Phases 2 05 ~ , 08 t 08 r 07 Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 ,, :-• §; :,Fit.7�,sc . z° u retry , ; . ; - , ;:, Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 28.0 31.0 18.0 35.0 38.0 0.0 18.0 33.0 0.0 21.0 36.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 23% 26% 15% 29% 32% 0% 15% 28% 0% 18% 30% 0% Maximum Green(s) 24.0 27.0 14.0 31.0 34.0 14.0 29.0 17.0 32.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 ' 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR • Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THEfRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF41 l • 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 8/4/2000 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 8/4/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings / { � Lanes,Volumes,Timings -+ ♦ ♦ 4- < 1 t r \* `/1 -• I-- { `r ' \ t , r 1 1 ana croup; ESL EBI ESE 1&BJ.. WRI I&IBl3 NEL NBI NSE SBL SBI SSE 1 ane rrnnp, EEL ESI EBB W81 WRT 1&1311 NHL NHI NSi3 BBL SRI SHE Lane Configurations Ii ft r vi ft. 11 fi, `1 44 j Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 119 950 839 448 1164 910 1625 60 840 511 Storage Length(ft) 200 300 200 0 300 0 200 200 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.22 0.21 0.11 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.02 0.21 0.01 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.03 Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 8.1 32.2 64.0 15.8 39.9 31.8 56.0 4.0 28.2 36.3 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.27 0.53 0.13 0.33 0.27 0.47 0.03 0.24 0.30 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.81 0.80 0.82 0.50 0.67 0.36 0.62 0.90 0.12 Lane Mil.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 54.4 41.1 11.6 50.7 32.0 39.4 14.1 57.2 44.4 1.7 Frt Protected 0.850 0.998 0.941 0.850 Platoon Factor 0.87 1.41 2.35 1.00 1.05 0.99 1.01 0.97 0.98 0.93 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 3.5 3.1 2.2 11.1 1.5 1.8 0.1 17.4 12.0 0.1 Satd.Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 3400 3498 0 3433 3295 0 1787 3574 1599 Webster Delay 50.8 61.2 29.6 61.6 35.1 40.6 14.5 72.7 55.7 1.7 Frt Perm. 0.826 0.998 0.931 0.826 Webster LOS D EC E D D B E E A Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1539 3400 3498 0 3433 3295 0 1787 3574 1554 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Cycle Length:120 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 14 1 164 55 Actuated Cycle Length:120 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:58(48%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 65 689 601 327 513 5 539 312 204 33 669 55 Natural Cycle:70 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 50 50 50 50 Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Total Lost Time:12 • Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.75 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.83 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:42.5 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:D Mid-Block Traffic(%) • 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 73 774 675 367 576 6 606 351 229 37 752 62 . Splits and Phases: 2:S Grady Way&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 73 774 675 367 582 0 606 580 0 37 752 62 Turn Type Prot Pm+Ov Prot Prot Prot Pm+Ov r 01 '.--70''.--70' 1 02 and m3 Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 t `' � +' '-� V4' ::'i�q ' "^'i Permitted Phases 2 4 0 -- Detector Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 °5 � m6 m7 t e8 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20,0 8.0 20.0 8.0 Total Split(s) 13.0 35.0 34.0 19.0 41.0 0.0 34.0 57.0 0.0 9.0 32.0 13.0 Total Split(%) 11% 29% 28% 16% 34% 0% 28% 48% 0% 8% 27% 11% Maximum Green(s) 9.0 31.0 30.0 15.0 37.0 30.0 53.0 5.0 28.0 9.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None Coord None None Coord None None None None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 3 Transpo-JLR Page 4 THETRANS-FF4I THETRANS-FF4I • • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way &Williams Ave S Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: PM Length of study period. hrs. 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 5 10 12 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 904 462 40 563 Movement 10 12 • HFR: 983 502 43 612 PHF: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t c,base 7.5 6.9 PHV: 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.7 0.0 t c,T: , 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Movements: 13 16 t c Flow: 50 50 1 stage 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 12.00 12.00 Walk speed: 4.00 4.00 Follow Up Time Calculations: t Blockage: 0.00 0.00 Movement 10 12 Median Type: None t f,base 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t f 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,26.3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 351 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 645 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Movement Capacity 645 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.05 Grade: 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 1043 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 225 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N N Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Channelized: N Movement Capacity 225 Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,80 approach: Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 N N N N N N N N N Channelized; N Grade; 0.00 v(vph) 43 306 C m(vph) 225 645 v/c 0.19 0.47 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: 95% queue length Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Control Delay 24.8 15.5 L T R L T R L T R LOS C C Approach Delay 16.7 Y N N N N Y N N Y Approach LOS C Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: • • s.,:i 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings -► \♦ < 4-- w `\ /' -4* • ♦ `_ '\ P J an f;rniin FRT ERR MIL N(HT NAL PIER J ane!unto Es= EBB. l&BL WaT NEL NER Lane Configurations 4 , 11 ?4 /1 r Walk Time(s) 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 • Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2158 587 3539 199 535 Storage Length(ft) 0 380 120 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.39 0.11 0.50 0.03 0.08 Storage Lanes 0 2 1 1 v/s Ratio Perm Total Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 55.6 15.4 90.0 10.0 28.4 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.17 1.00 0.11 0.32 Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.67 0.50 0.30 0.24 Lane Util.Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 10.8 34.9 0.0 36.8 14.7 • Frt Protected 0.987 0.850 Platoon Factor 1.05 0.96 1.00 0.83 0.95 Fft Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.4 2.9 0.5 0.8 0.2 Satd.Flow(prat) 3493 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Webster Delay 12.7 36.3 0.5 31.4 14.2 Frt Penn. 0.987 0.850 Webster LOS B D A CB Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(pens) 3493 0 3433 3539 1787 1599 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red No Yes Cycle Length:90 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 44 Actuated Cycle Length:90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Offset:4(4%),Referenced to phase 2:EBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 1158 108 365 1662 55 120 Natural Cycle:75 Confl.Pads.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor . 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.58 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.62 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:9.7 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:A Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 1245 116 392 1787 59 129 Splits and Phases: 4:S Grady Way&Main Ave S-Benson Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 1361 0 392 1787 59 129 s Turn Type Prot Pt+Ov �t of -0"e2 Y'03 r 2 Protected Phases 2 1 3 3 1 i ,`fa"as M• a 7pa r'+�pwat' ' mpf?.ozvor'+-G `»=mamas ®`ri r.Mt� i� Permitted Phases Free Detector Phases 2 1 3 3 1 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split(s) 50.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 Total Split(%) 56% 0% 22% 0% 22% 44% Maximum Green(s) 46.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode Coord None None Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 THETRANS-FF4I • .`i t1 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 2001 With-Project,PM Peak Hour 7/31/2000 Lanes,Volumes,Timings Lanes,Volumes,Timings 4\ t 4/ } 4\ t 1 r ano f;rnuR EEL EBB H81. MBI S8Z S88 J ano Grnui EHL EBB rjlBL NET SBI MRLane Configurations � r S ++ do Walk Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 Lane Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Lane Grp Cap(vph) 176 372 149 2865 2387 Storage Length(ft) 0 0 116 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.26 0.61 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 Total Lost The(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Critical LG? Yes Yes Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 Act Effct Green(s) 5.9 13.9 5.0 48.1 40.1 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 .0 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.23 0.08 0.80 0.67 • Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.96 0.65 0.32 0.92 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay,di 25.2 22.6 26.6 1.6 8.5 Frt Protected 0.850 0.999 Platoon Factor 0.63 0.87 1.00 1.41 0.98 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Incr.Delay,d2 1.0 35.7 9.8 0.3 5.3 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Webster Delay 16.9 55.4 36.4 2.5 13.7 Fit Penn. 0.850 0.999 Webster LOS B E D A B Flt Penn. 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 1787 1599 1787 3574 3571 0 Area Type: Other Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Cycle Length:60 Satd.Flow(RTOR) 2 2 Actuated Cycle Length:60 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Offset:2(3%),Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT,Start of Green Volume(vph) 55 350 95 909 2126 20 Natural Cycle:90 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Total Lost Time:6 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sum of Critical v/s Ratios:0.84 • Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Intersection v/c Ratio:0.93 Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection Webster Signal Delay:15.6 Parking (#/hr) Intersection LOS:B Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 56 357 97 928 2169 20 Splits and Phases: 5:S Renton Village PI&Talbot Rd S Lane Group Flow(vph) 56 357 97 928 2189 0 Turn Type Pm+Ov Prot t 02 04 rotected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 .u;.:.>, Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phases 4 5 5 2 6 * 05 1 e6 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ` `\ � �� h Minimum Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20,0 Total Split(s) 20.0 8.0 8.0 40.0 32.0 0.0 Total Split(%) 33% 13% 13% 67% 53% 0% Maximum Green(s) 16.0 4.0 4.0 36.0 28.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . Minimum Gap(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None Coord Coord Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Southpointe(00183.00) Synchro 4 Report Transpo-JLR Page 1 Transpo-JLR Page 2 THETRANS-FF41 t ? THETRANS-FF4I :E • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-3LR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: S Grady Way &Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: PM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 4 5 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 838 68 30 995 66 Movement 4 9 HFR: 931 76 33 1106 73 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,base 4.1 6.9 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 '0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 t c,T: Movements: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 t c Flow: 1 stage 4.1 6.9 Lane width: Walk speed: Follow Up Time Calculations: t Blockage: Movement 4 9 Median Type: None t f,base 2.2 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 Flared ap proach Movements: t f 2.2 3.3 # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 466 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 544 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y N N N Y Movement Capacity 544 Probability of Queue free St. 0.87 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Conflicting Flows 1007 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Potential Capacity 684 L T R L T R L T R Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1,00 Movement Capacity 684 Y N N N Y N N Y N Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N Y N N N N N N v(vph) 33 73 Channelized: N C m(vph) 684 544 Grade: 0.00 v/c 0.05 0.13 95t queue length Control Delay 10.5 12.7 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: LOS B B Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Approach Delay 12.7 L T R L T R L T R Approach LOS B N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: - .: fh • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Analyst: Transpo-JLR Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: Talbot Rd S &North Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: PM Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 5 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 1079 3 2117 131 Movement 9 HFR: 1199 3 2352 146 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,base 6.9 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 P by 0.02 t c,g 0.1 G 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 t c,T: Movements: 1 stage 0.00 Flow: t c • Lane width: 1 stage 6.9 Walk speed: Follow Up Time Calculations: % Blockage: Movement 9 Median Type: None t f,base 3.3 # of vehicles: 0 t f,HV 1.0 P by 0.02 Flared approach Movements: t f 3.3 _ # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane usage for movements 1,293 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 601 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 443 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 N Y N N Y Y N N N Movement Capacity 443 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.67 Grade: 0.00 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Lane usage for movements 4,596 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Movement 1 4 7 8 8 10 11 12 L T R L T R L T R N Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N v(vph) 146 Grade: 0.00 • C m(vph) 443 v/c 0.33 95% queue length Lane usage for movements 7,899 approach: Control Delay 17.0 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 LOS C L T R L T R L T R Approach Delay 17.0 Approach LOS C N N Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11912 approach: Lane 1 - Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1c Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Analyst: Tranapo-JLR Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 3400 3400 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Intersection: Talbot Rd S.& South Access Dwy Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Count Date: 2001 With-Project Time Period: PM Length of study period, hrs. 0.25 Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 Critical Gap Calculations: Volume: 960 4 12 2105 41 122 Movement 4 7 9 HFR: 1067 4 13 2339 46 136 PHI,: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9 PHV. 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movements: 2 stage 0.00 1.00 0.00 t c Flow: 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9 Lane width: 2 stage 4.1 5.8 6.9 Walk speed: 4 Blockage: Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 9 t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 fFlared approach Movements: t hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 P 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Conflicting Flows 536 Potential Capacity 489 N Y N N Y Y N N N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 489 Channelized: N Probability of Queue free St. 0.72 Grade: 0.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Conflicting Flows 1071 L T R L T R L T R Potential Capacity 646 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Y N N N Y N N Y N Movement Capacity 646 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Worksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Step 3: TN from Minor St. 8 11 L T R L T R L T R Part 1- First Stage Y N N N N Y N N N Conflicting Flows 1069 2366 Potential Capacity 300 69 Channelized: N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Grade: 0.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.98 Movement Capacity 300 67 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Part 2- Second Stage N N N N N N N N N Conflicting Flows 2366 1071 Potential Capacity 69 300 Channelized: N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Grade: 0.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 1.00 Movement Capacity 67 300 Data for Computing,-Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 3434 3437 • Potential Capacity 7 7 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding event 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 7 7 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.99 0.99 Y C t 4.87 0.22 67 67 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Worksheet 7b - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1- First Stage Conflicting Flows 1069 2366 Potential Capacity 291 58 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding event 1.00 0.98 Movement Capacity 291 57 - Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 1196 533 Potential Capacity 249 558 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.72 Movement Capacity 244 404 Part 3- Single Stage • Conflicting Flows 2265 2899 Potential Capacity 34 13 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.71 Movement Capacity 34 9 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.99 0.99 y C t 1.22 0.13 235 57 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 13 46 136 C m(vph) 646 235 489 v/c 0.02 0.19 0.28 95t queue length Control Delay 10.7 23.9 15.2 LOS B C C Approach Delay 17.4 Approach LOS C r Appendix B Trip Generation and Internal Capture Summary Worksheets Daily and PM Peak Hour 7 1 -�- > ;7 Kr ! t WM Analyst /t..at MULTI-USE L":ELOPMENT Name ofDvi t ntT�6/�trT� Date y,_ 44, TRIP GENERATION p AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY Time Period ,C7/}/1.—)00 LAND USE A -/`i• e`—/-E ITE LU Code 7/0 Exit to External Size 9‹ ere //1489 Total Internal External Enter 4,So 7- /- /fl-t_q P.,�c� Exit �Sp1- /$ /r fig? Enterfro,m Ex/te3l Total 3 p/SG 3a- '98a • % /rD/• . // / 79/ and Demand Demand • Balanced Balanced f %I I Demand DemandLAND USEB'Z'� LAND USE C ' ITE LU Code eb3/ IT U Code Exit to External Size /i �% Demand Balanced Demand •tt//� e Enter from External T3� _ Total Internal External % % Tota Into External Enter yLso /$ 543.9- r ' Enter f�- al Exit 5Y.so /� . 43[. - . �° O. ► ° Exit 3 Total �° �j QQ Enterlrom External / 3� D Demand Balanced Demand Total Exit to External fryi /od/ fG/ 9Gl r v Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development 4 , LAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C TOTAL Enter Source:Kaku Associates,Inc. J, �-93 SG 3 a /j ?S Exit /` SG 8 7' Y-34 " 9a-S _;:, Total •, 7 g P— 0 4 g 3 j 070 INTERNAL CAPTURE `; Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 3 O/ .r v :tea. 4p Analyst ��— MULTI-USE G'�..'ELOPMENT Name of Dvlpt Ve�� Date /3 TRIP GENERATIONTime Periodit2 daF—s1- AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LAND USE A f EN' es-/ CE ITE LU Code 7'/ Exit to Externalxt� Size �9/, Q`l0 I—. C I Total Internal External Enter 66 9 / g �� Exit 33? / 336 _ . Total s[o 6 a, )fL Enter from External % /eV/ • //- 79Y Imo. Z� Demand Demand Demand Demand l / Balaanced Balanced Balanced Balanced y% 4 '5% / % % Demand Demand Demand Demand LAND USE B de ? LAND USE C _ • ITE LU Code 03/ ITE LU Code Exit to External Size 10/'5T) Demand Balanced Demand �� - Size Enter from External Total Internal External % % 1 Intern External '411"`� Enter 56 / `f Enter '� Exit ."S / a-Z- ► Num % % Exit Total Total :;,-,,Enter Enter from External Demand Balanced Demand Exit to External iY % /aal 3/ 777 Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development LAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C TOTAL Enter 6 S ! //� Source:Kaku Associates,Inc. Exit 33p ,p--$4- .5lvo TotalfG � INTERNAL CAPTURE Single-Use Trip Gen. Est.st. T�4 C j-O f D $ Z Appendix C Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis at Talbot Road S/Southerly Access Driveway { .1 .' . • i';'. .f,7::.. • .___..._ • ' :.*:;• '- ..... • . •. • . . . 1:.'':.••• . ;• •• • ' - . . . • • . • •.•,-.. . . • -••• . . . . . . • • ••• • • . . . .• .... .. ..._ .... • .. FIGURE 4-5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT . . • •. . . • . = . . . a. . • • • > . • 1 600 i ...,,......J.0 -., ....-,,, ,..,-,.....8 CPLMm0111111.0011.19 * . = . ..• , . I-- 0 500 I I I . 1 1 I I i( . . ..... . . LLI < r 2 OR MORE LANES Et 1 LANE ..... I-Li 0 % k icC cc 400 - I .- I i ' - i •-• 0_ • .......k . . . .. . • .0_ . . _ cc ‹. 300 . . , . - *". , 1 \ • ,.. •..• 0 w it 4'1. • • •2•D 200 1111111 tn N. • ...... - .. ... . ,.. . • *0 — Na..... ...... . > i 100 X. . • :.: :.... . :: ••••::. E 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 ft - . .. • MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH • . • . . .. • *NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER •..• • ::. • THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. . • . • 4-:- ''.1 . •71'... t---, • . . • '-=--, T ffo. 5-- ‘ 171-7.7-/A'j'e-e, 4-C7.g . 62/e/1,---1141) - -•----- - . .... . . , . . . _ _.. • :...• .-...._.,. . . ,. ., ••:.,.... ..:. - •..i: r- -,-,i, . . .: . • dxi -..i:".44...? -. . .f. /-4,--rA- . :t)e-e7947e.•.•c5- -,i/vii: :A.,. ,/y4,464,,--;,fri, . ' • • - . • . • , . • .-•::.:.• . . :•:;1 .: I.:: ,-•.:-. :,•-- ' . , • . . . .. . :•_-_7 . . . . • ! . . :.,:, . . % . . • .. • •: , . . • •.4:.• . . • . . . . . - . ..1 .•.• , • • • . ... . • .• ..... ..... • . • .,:• . . . ••:•::: ,:,z.:.; . L.. . • .. . - . • .. . .. . . •-•••••,• -. • • ' • .. •• -•' . * . . ;::%:'2 . . . . • • . . • • • • . • • . "*: .f; . - *('...17 • : . • . • . . • • . . " •:.• . . • • . . . :•.•.:: , . . Appendix D Maximum Queue Length Calculations/Estimates • I r l 1 • Southpointe Development, Opus The Transpo Group, Inc. 00183.00 - 2001 With-Project Traffic Volumes QUEUE LENGTH CALCULATIONS Average Queue Length* = [Volume(veh/hr)x Red Time(sec/cycle)]/3600(sec/hr) = Volume/Cycle(veh/cycle/hr)x%Red Time Intersection Lane Flow Avg Cycle Avg Queue Avg Queue*** Max Queue** Max Queue*** Movement Rate(veh/hr) length(sec) g/C Ratio Cycles/Hour %Red (vehicles) (in feet) (vehicles) (in feet) AM Peak Hour S Grady Wy/Talbot Rd S Northbound Left t�' g;;;695-%.MV ;7�20:f .4,T ' 045 " 30 55% 13 325 19 475 Northbound Through :,. z"63� n#.V :,. .n=;;:xr,?, ;< 30 'a .�'`��;�� `:z:_ 20"<;.�<`'''`' '04$''- _� 52% 12 300 18 450 Northbound Through-Right "' "' tr°` ` `=s 'y ' "k n�;^�° "4;8 :;;--� 52% 12 300 18 450 �.t,�:.:„`680;��<��w>ti,__�12Q,z..,.,.��..<<..�0��.....,. 30 S Grady Wy/Access Driveway Westbound Left (Based on Figure 10-12 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual) tTa'w<-1P,-`: 25 Talbot Rd S/South Access Driveway Southbound Left (Based on Figure 10-12 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual) ; ;:7, Z"?j ;'r: 50 PM Peak Hour S Grady Wy/Talbot Rd S Northbound Left `=i `305. '�` 12f1'=''T:` ;',T 027`` 30 73% 8 200 13 325 Northbound Through '6_ ;, ' - - ` , `` 'X' "'"! g 'Z9�;='; '"°�' �� 30 53% 6 150 10 250 Northbound Through-Right s:-- 29C ;z ;, 1"20:_ ` ` 'Z 4 . 30 53% 6 150 10 250 S Grady Wy/Access Driveway Westbound Left (Based on Figure 10-12 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual) - l n, " g g Y P Y .._k_, ,-1=��M:.._._ 25 Talbot Rd S/South Access Driveway Southbound Left --- "" (Based on Figure 10-12 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual) ;�_:;l�;kz�F� € 25 * Based on Equation 16.19 in the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, Second Edition. **Based on a poisson arrival distribution. ***Based on an average vehicle length of 25 feet. 10-22 URBAN STREETS 00 �0000 00 00 100 t N 1 °o N 80 •° i o - of 60 c o • 40 °� U 11`1 a) > 20I \it / 0 a .Q o E 10 // 8 zJ o kN z E 6 / v o"" L1 E 4 / No��1Y PQpIo x i ctS -0 N ,:i $1 CD v • © Ph����c �v. 5�z� voGrt - �s� k % Q) 1 W (3 • 0 . 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Volume/Capacity Ratio Figure 10-12. Estimation of 95th-percentile queue length. tions have demonstrated that the probability distribution function Control Delay , for queue lengths for any minor movement at an unsignalized The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number (w--`i', intersection is a function of the capacity of the movement and the of factors that relate to control,geometrics,traffic, and incidents. µ(: volume.of traffic being served during the analysis period.Figure Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually expe- 1- 10-12 can be used to estimate the 95th-percentile queue length for rienced and the reference travel time that would result during any minor movement at an unsignalized intersection during the conditions with ideal geometrics and in the absence of incidents, r -' peak 15-min period on the basis of these two parameters (13). control, and traffic. Chapters 9 and 10 of this manual quantify The mean queue length is computed as the product of the aver- . only that portion of total delay attributed to traffic control mea- age delay per vehicle and the flow rate for the movement of inter- sures,either traffic signals or stop signs.This delay is called con- est. The expected total delay (in vehicle hours per hour) equals trol delay and its use is consistent in Chapters 9, 10, and 11. ('_, ' the expected number of vehicles in the average queue;that is, the Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up ((' total hourly delay and the average queue are numerically identical. time,stopped delay,and final acceleration delay. j For example,4 vehicle-hr/hr of delay can be used interchangeably Although the methodology here results in an estimate of average with an average queue length of 4 during the hour. control delay, it is recommended that, where possible under ex- Updated December 1997 10-22 URBAN STREETS 0 0 80 060 ° c 40 '� 2°0 1) 11t i 14 .0 o .�O 20 '+-- j D 0 J i -� a. / 10 f i ,7 n 8 tZ ; Z 20��e" W E 1 t i •X 46 �° `,1 `' CZ -0 �1 0 2 U11 N Q W4111 i 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Volume/Capacity Ratio Figure 10-12. Estimation of 95th-percentile queue length. tions have demonstrated that the probability distribution function Control Delay ; t i, for queue lengths for any minor movement at an unsignalized The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number r intersection is a function of the capacity of the movement and the of factors that relate to control,geometrics,traffic,and incidents. .'.'7 volume.of traffic being served during the analysis period. Figure Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually expe- -1, 10-12 can be used to estimate the 95th-percentile queue length for rienced and the reference travel time that would result during - • any minor movement at an unsignalized intersection during the conditions with ideal geometrics and in the absence of incidents, peak 15-minperiod on the basis of these twoparameters 13 ( )• control, and traffic. Chapters 9 and 10 of this manual quantify - - The mean queue length is computed as the product of the aver- only that portion of total delay attributed to traffic control mea- i _, age delay per vehicle and the flow rate for the movement of inter- sures,either traffic signals or stop signs..This delay is called con- ,, ;i est. The expected total delay (in vehicle hours per hour) equals trol delay and its use is consistent in Chapters 9, 10, and 11. _, the expected number of vehicles in the average queue;that is,the Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up total hourly delay and the average queue are numerically identical. time,stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. l,': ) For example,4 vehicle-hdhr of delaycan be used interchangeablythe methodologyhere results in an estimate of average P � Although g F� -: with an average queue length of 4 during the hour. control delay, it is recommended that, where possible under ex- Y Updated December 1997 1. I Appendix E Auxiliary Lane Warrant Analyses at Site Access Driveways bi • ki intersections • • RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES (' 53e9ev) ti p 100 1 r 1 I r 1 w Right-Turn Lane = 80 - (Figure 910- 11b) _ Right-Turn Pocket or Recommended j _ Taper (Figure 910-1a) 11Recommended •� P '� (� jJ . 40 - o' n' 0 20 1u = Radius Only Recommendec �l j a (� \ W r r r 1 r r vl 0_ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 I PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV) * i * For two- lane highways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn) . For multilane, high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. , Note:When all three of the following conditions are met, the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPH . 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH or under . _ 2 . Right-turn volume greater than 40 VPH . 3 . Total approach volume less than 300 VPH . Right-Turn Lane Guidelines ,`= Figure 910-10 " ' i 1 Page 910-46 Design Manual i March 1994 Intersections RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES a v 11 = k 0 100 I Right-Turn Lane 80 - (Figure 910- 11b) oRight-Turn Pocket or Recommended Taper (Figure 910-11a) Recommended ft r3 60 - X l 0 C, t 0 20 • = Radius Only Recommended % a - PM Pf /,h2,&V s, S k w i i i w 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV ) * . ) i 1 * For two- lane h i.ghways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn) . 1 For multilane, high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. y' Note:When all three of the following conditions are met, the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPH . • 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH or under . 2 . Right-turn volume greater than 40 VPH . 3 . Total approach volume less than 300 VPH . ., �:-,. Right-Turn Lane Guidelines Figure 910-10 ' 1 • J Page 910-46 Design Manual I I March 1994 . I . , . 1^ Intersections "JJ • I a RIGHT- TURN LANE GUIDELINES lk D o 100 I I 1 1 1 I i I Lu Right-Turn Lane 80 - (Figure 910-11b) - __I Right-Turn Pocket or Recommended O Taper (Figure 910-110) Recommended ~ 6, 0 4 0 - , Q! 0 2 0 wig- y. si- e, Re) / = Radius Only Recommended a Pt 9` hse-/76 s; s, c LJJ I I 1 I _J q 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7007 i' PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME ( DDHV ) * J * For two- lane highways use the peak hour approach volume ( through + right turn) . For multilane, high speed ( Posted at 45 MPH or above ) highways , use the right- lane peak hour approach l volume (through + right turn). For 3-R projects, use current year volumes. '•? Note:When all three of the fo I I ow i ng , cond i t i ons are `` • met , the DDHV is reduced by 20 VPHO (. r 1 1 . Posted speed 45 MPH . or under. 2 < Right—turn volume greater than 40 VPH . , 3 . Total approach volume less than 300 VPHO 1 Right-Turn Lane Guidelines r. ,c__ Figure 910-10 i • I Page 910-46 Design Manual t March 1994 • • • 1, • Appendix F .„.„1 Daily Trip Generation Estimates for Existing On-Site Uses. iS ...„ --;i • i /1; C. t• n .1 n 1 ) - - '1 • ) • •,•22,•-1,1,•;.• It, PROJECT NO: 11'ldf5.7. ee DATE: 0/ TIME: FROM: te.-6.-r The .1 TO: PHONE: Trans SUBJECT: cit>5 . gy, GOUP 7v (.574e-771W )—eered /12-4117— 14- 411sZ:2 .7zp A-t82/,-7 > •/ 5 7 efilr --V-> 53, 51-3s- 7 1-.9771.4a7 *S.E i7/L-7 /2--/f2E 6. 6. 97-(5-.3• 14-,F-7) • r 6/t-pig;) g-try .. .9499' >47ele? /<-44-1 eiP . //e/ 97-5-) 33o -7L-- ea . ,44rerfr • • \ f _ • , vb13 - - . • . . , , , , , . . , ' '-''.:1,'!.10 • ,..„ • , E , . - . . . . , . .. • it . ), • c Pi • : T .. ptith.iftw31111 , ... • tt\e' . .. '‘) • • .. stieuta 03Immig. • e • ' .. •• • -' • • . .,,... Att'. . . , Aw4 kovOipisviiii71.IM.,: .. . ____,, • • . ''' - / w.. . .,,... / .. . , • / . ,„. . . • • ,.. . .t. 'A- ,:.4X - / . , • . . , •• . ,.. . , 1 . . • .• ... .. 1 1 ://1.e. , .4.10 , i . ' • • i '\ . Apt, ft) 40,1 IP_ .•,... ao. •' . .--4, ,, . - . / . 4• • . . . z . if ,,, • . Ni . .. , . ,, . . . - : . . • , •/ . . . . . . . , . / . , . . . . . • , i..: ,. . . . • i r ,! c I nib► 31al' , Avt4 Acti69/sviviTIIM., , v, V/ //1-4('‘ fd ' - I / °PAL \__________ �`i .A11,4N ob. b . . • . . , • 1 . . •-• . .• . . . . . , - • . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . • . . . .. . . / . . . r . .. . . ' ' . • . . . . . . . • . 1 ., 1 t 1 / ''., 4,4 ,Or. v• ole .‘. ,r:: . Sc . . . • . .I'. ...‘. • . .. , . / , : .. . . . . . . . • . ' .'..)Ir . . . . . . . . • • i .- 1' ' >11 f•' " '.. • , .:' • - . . . . . . . .. . • , .. " • . - ,• . . ,... . . . . . . 11 / I . . 1 . , . . .. 41 / ' • - . . . s . . t. -....;,H "f- Agy . ,: • . 0 . . . • , . '-'''. /,';.- ,..- . / • ...:." • . - . . . l'''• i• • I ...., . . . . . . , , „• • .. . . / ..--11,• . .. ,,. . . . . . • :-. .* . '/. • ' . . . ,., , , • ,,,•,, • ,. , . . ... •• . . . . , N '••• '. . . / .. . % . . • .;:ity‘ . . :4..‘ • , . . . . . ,.. / . . .. 1-. ,-. • , • . . . . . . • % -. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , , • . . .. . . . . N • . • . -„,,,, , . N . .. . --•:,_ . \ . • . , . . . fie°1C). .f ..., , . • • • ,\t • • I • \ • i \ • i \ • \ \ • I \• • . ' • • \ • i N. / \ \��' • : . ' \ikiih..\6" -?„., \/ \\ DX)• 237( \(N.). • AILv _ CD �,W • Nell\-9. \ o 'er \\\ - . \ \ . • 6l \ • \ \•c-4% 1d PIS �— _ . % % Lac9 •- ,tii.0 N--\ .y _ 6 l ;per�' Q aphibb._ , : 7.1\ . ., • ./- . .\\Alf\ , A . .. \. \ C"\. 2� N3 ION O \ • ' \ 9l i.‘. ;• , o Prairo ,9 • r( '4, tt . • \X\ 0 \ • ,, cP \ ° \ �S vo • 00 \ i \ \ f• l' • \ / • . '. & citA, r— / ,/ g 59 ' g -17dH \� ap kLIO \ \ 'V 'i II il -----:( 430 •Nj v 40. s • �, ` �o.. v �� � • � \,_ \� / • + 1O277 ` .i., .. 149.01.. \ \ .\. :, \�j6J , 501°27'57"W,,,v.,..._-• . \, s,3 \ \ er••• ' :if-- . ir ,oc •-: . . N. -: . 95.14' \ \ • 7 • S01°27 67"W y • . ' • ,o ,�. x ro ®0-114 (9) ) PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Company of Washington, Inc. 'Via US Mail' "VErv • �� June 22, 2000 s r¢� , TO PJ Santos opus NW LL Opus Northwest 915 - 118th Ave SE, #300 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Our Escrow Number: 48057324 Puget Western, Inc./Opus Northwest Property located in Renton, WA Dear Mr. Santos: In connection with the above-captioned transaction, we have enclosed herewith the following: COPY of the preliminary title report issued by First American Title, order number 810306-C3. Please review and keep for your records. Please feel free to contact the undersigned if you have any questions. Very truly yours, QJQj1GLk\CLm Rebekkah Chamaty, Escrow Assistant to Dee McComb, AVP/ Commercial Escrow Closer (206) 343-1343; Fax: '( 206) 343-1306 ®�vGap� NTpis ING DM; rc 12, rat Enc. SEP BECENEID • 215 Columbia Street' a Seattle,WA 98104-1511 a (206) 622-1040 a Fax: (206) 343-1358 S.T AMER / 0 •: • rat:::': .. Commitment for Title Insurance Puget Western, Inc. To . Opus Northwest, L.L.C. Renton: Grady & Talbot King County, WA. Title Order No. 8103'06-C3 National Accounts Division First American Title Insurance Company 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 712 Seattle, Washington 98121-2318 (800) 526-7544 FAX:• (206) 448-6348 Form WA-5(6/76) Commitment Face Page • • COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE • ISSUED SY First American Title insurance Company • FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule.A, upon payment of.the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy . or•policies committed'for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent indorsement. • • This Commitment ispreliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obli- gations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies i committed for shall issue,whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the'Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment • is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as"Effective'Date." • • .1 t� r, `T' Lt S = • �\ sALE 1rYsU�P ,� First American Title Insurance Company •• �,,•• n BY PREEIoENT • • t-• SEPTEMBER 24, 3 • SECRETARY �'•• • 1968 .• �,� ,� ATTEST � f'(/�''''��t'� „4 f F 4` lk\ • COUNTERSIGrtED `ass+w'a 6 Y ti.t p M F, l! 4. First American Title Insurance Company 2101 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 712, SEATTLE, WA 98121 NATIONAL/COMMERCIAL DIVISION TITLE UNIT - C3 FAX NO. (206) 615-3000 RICHARD BOOTH COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER (206) 615-3008 • ORDER NO. 810306-C3 YOUR NO. 27880/RENTON/4805688 3/GRADY-TALBOT PUGET WESTERN/OPUS TO: PUGET WESTERN INC. 19515 NORTHCREEK PKWY, #310 BOTHELL, WA 98011 ATTN: GUST M. ERIKSON THIRD REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 22, 2000. AT 7:30 A.M. 2. PROPOSED INSURED: OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. POLICY/POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX ALTA 1970 FORM B (REV 10/17/84) EXTENDED OWNER'S COVERAGE $ 9,900,000.00 STANDARD PORTION $ 12,600.00 $ 1,083.60 EXTENDED PORTION $ 3,780.00 $ 325.08 4. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED ON PAGE 2 HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: PUGET WESTERN, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 5. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED IN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO. Page 1 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 810306-C3 PARCEL A: THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1 OF WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 23, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 2850, WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL B: LOT D OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98-164-LLA RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9812109014. • Page 2 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: ITEM (A) PAYMENT TO OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS OF THE FULL CONSIDERATION FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED. ITEM (B) PROPER INSTRUMENT(S) CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY. A. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. B. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. C. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENT OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. D. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY PUBLIC RECORDS. E. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER; WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (D) INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES. F. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. G. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION, TAP OR REIMBURSEMENT CHARGES/COSTS FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR- ELECTRICITY. H. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE THE PROPOSED INSURED j ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGES THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 1 t l i ( F1 ,,c Page 3 .^ SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 810306-C3 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. LIEN OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. LEVY CODE: 2110 2. DELETED 3. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST, YEAR: 2000 AMOUNT BILLED: $7,398.24 AMOUNT PAID: S3,699.12 AMOUNT DUE: S3,699.12, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 915460-0010-00 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $569,100.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: NONE (AS TO PARCEL A) 4. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST. YEAR: 2000 AMOUNT BILLED: $58,690.11 AMOUNT PAID: $29,345.06 AMOUNT DUE: $29,345.05, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 202305-9007-08 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $2,836,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $1,681,700.00 (AS TO PARCEL B) 5. DELETED 6. ALTA SURVEY BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATED DUNE 3, 1998 UNDER JOB NO. 6687 AND OUR PHYSI.CAL NSPECTION MADE MAY 12, 2000 DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION ALTA EXTENDED OWNER'S/PURCHASER COVERAGE: A. EXISTNG CONCRETE CHANNEL CARRYING (APPARENTLY STORM) WATER FROM TWO CONCRETE PIPES CROSSING UNDER BENSON ROAD SOUTHWESTERLY THROUGH SAID PROPERTY B. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ENCROACHES ON EAST PROPERTY LINE C. PARCELS A & C ON SURVEY ARE NOT INCLUDED ON COMMITMENT D. SURVEY IS NOT CERTIFIED AS TO FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. 8I 0306-C3 ' • Page 4 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO, 810306-C3 7. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. 8. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES FOR J. F. BENSON ROAD REVISION AS GRANTED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2827715. 9. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, TOGETHER WITH RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: DULY 23, 1958 RECORDING NO.: 4924770 IN FAVOR OF: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON (AS TO PARCEL B) 10. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, ' TOGETHER WITH RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: MAY 6, 1964 RECORDING NO.: 5732439 IN FAVOR OF: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON (AS TO PARCEL B) 11. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 761065. 12. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: APRIL 21, 1965 RECORDING NO.: 5937434 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 13. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 17, 1972 RECORDING NO.: 7205170497 IN FAVOR OF: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE FOR: A MANHOLE VAULT, TOGETHER WITH COMMUNICATIONS LINES ENCLOSED WITHIN A. CONCRETE CONDUIT SYSTEM AFFECTS: A NORTHWESTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B • Page 5 "� • j SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 810306-C3 14. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: APRIL 2, 1974 RECORDING NO.: 7405290484 N FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: WATER LINE AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 15. TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN RECORDED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (BOUNDARY LINE REVISION): RECORDED: DECEMBER 10, 1998 RECORDING NO.: 9812109014 16. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1998 RECORDING NO.: 9812171951 IN FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION . SYSTEM AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 17. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT: RECORDED: JANUARY 25, 2000 RECORDING NO.: 20000125001281 18. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT: RECORDED: JANUARY 25, 2000 RECORDING NO.: 20000125001282 19. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT: RECORDED: JANUARY 25, 2000 RECORDING NO.: 20000125001283 NOTE #1: ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE IS TO VEST IN OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY .COMPANY. EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS DISCLOSES NO MATTERS PENDING AGAINST SAID PARTY(IES). Page 6 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 810306-C3 INFORMATIONAL NOTES: EFFECTIVE JANUARY I, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. THE DESCRIPTION CAN BE ABBREVIATED AS SUGGESTED BELOW IF NECESSARY TO MEET STANDARDIZATION REQUIREMENTS. THE FULL TEXT OF THE DESCRIPTION MUST APPEAR IN THE DOCUMENT(S) TO BE INSURED. BLOCKS 1-2, WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADD., VOL. 6, P. 23 & LOT D, LLA LUA-98-164-LLA, REC. 9812109014. TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 972500-0751-06, 915460-0010-00 & 202305-9007-08 A FEE WILL BE CHARGED UPON THE CANCELLATION OF THIS COMMITMENT PURSUANT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE INSURANCE CODE AND THE FILED RATE ') SCHEDULE OF THE COMPANY. END OF SCHEDULE B JH/EJH CC: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL ACCOUNTS 2101 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 712 SEATTLE, WA 98121 ATTN: MELISSA WOLFE CC: PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 215 COLUMBIA STREET SEATTLE, WA 98104 ATTN: DEE MCCOMB CC: PERKINS COTE 411 108TH AVENUE, N.E., SUITE 1800 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 ATTN: R. GERARD LUTZ CC: OPUS NORTHWEST 915 118TH AVENUE, S.E., SUITE 300 ram... BELLEVUE, WA 98005 ATTN: BART BRYNESTAD • Page 7 • i -• t • NQ•TT "„'�� ORDER h e, J 0,30 1 SUBDIVISION.Ae. ac=. c u•►at.swo,.rt••r� i Sr , ,.l I s> IS as=courtesy only by RCDG NO./VOL& Pa. e44" t:l Pc.23 • 'PI* eeeee Cotapemy sad It is '�QT s pat of say due G3R SEC 1'i1 110P TWNSHP az NI RNG SE. 7-`arzaitmeat or policy of title iawruue. k is*Mob is furnished solely for the pupas*of is istiag in -atinEthe premises sad does cot purport to:bewailbi;hwsyt, ..• �•` "'•. roads,oressenteats effecting the property. No reliance should w be placed upon this*gels for the location or dioteasieas of the property Ind no Iisbllity is assumed for the comers thereof, ` ._ 7 a I d.oe.rlr • I t .r wow '••, '� .Wanks 4 s '• +� 'I. ."'" ei e.trait J .' , ' Y *,,,, ■.ar py ty.at0 og h. v4o.4.w.,„0 i,4 ll \"s...• taua MLJ -..'/'/ / .. t ,- I 3' O •a.. -n•... 40 grwr •e1 Wer1• f� t a Ili- ..•,,.. . ,/ ' Q Z O \ ‘f, I 47 1 ,, . . . .• , *. . , V s•zyrz r161,.41.' fit . .i + • • .,\ . A.r4 se Ms(tf R Buz% it' I / I rmeY 9+em r'' • e 10.4-7471 f .. / 70J \ tn,r �a 'a (4 , ` 7 t .- .- • ' ' .;; -g( A . / t ,�►' • ea.s / •44 ny zo >r �N so , Y i 4 . �eT u m,attt t , / _t0 ssrnxh t tlr� w t I„. 143 , g v`may', t I.' m it, / 01 . a . wimaax e ...,/ . . ir ./ l!1 � If I axe..m. a a. r un kW' I�. j�.�aL.,�;_,a i • I 4..), a . I _ ' •0. I Form No. 1755 • Commitment,Conditions and Stipulations . COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term"mortgage,"'when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company .is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed•Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company,'or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or'(b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the.Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this Commitment. • • • 1 • • P. a WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: a l Puget Wester,Inc. t: 19515 Northoreeic Parkway,Suite 310 a I. Bothell,WA 98011 E S 3 • i C i STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Grantor(s): Puget Sound Energy,Inc. g 2 Grantee(a): Puget Western,Inc. /t 1 Abbreviated Legal: SW 17-23-05;NE 19-23-05;NW20-23.05 ��t V a O Full Legal Description on page(s): 3 • a II Assess Tax Parcel Numberts);172305-907Z 192305-9090;192305-9091.20 9008; II 202305-9007;202305-9008;202305-9037;202305. 050;915460-0010;202306--9028;202305 9146 ¢ M1 cs1 Grantor, Puget Sound Energy, inc., a Washington corporation (formerly Puget Sound Power&Light Company),for and In consideration of ten no/100(310.00)dollars and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, conveys and warrants to PUCE r WasTenti, INC., A WAsHINOTON CattPOnAT)ON,("Grantee')the Wowing described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington: . • Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit"A'and by reference made a part hared, • SUBJECT TO: Easements,restrictions.reservations,covenants B • ) . Dated November , ,1998-• Puget -• •,,Inc. . .aarJ,i By: . Its: Ditsoior. . • . Fadit es • • j. . Statutory Warranty Deed Initials I Renton(Grady/r30ot t tn7/9a0ea4 AM PAGE-1 , • • V 1_5-11 1`+ : ../ . .r %f /I: . -.fr . .. ......S.:Y -d' .Y.:iffib-. , -_ ..r err: « - ' , ; .y . ......_. • • .. • • . • • .-..-----.-• .••,... . •. III - 1.• • 1 .. . ... . • .. -... •—.. ...- , . . , . • - ,. . . . . • . . • ....... . . . • • . . -- . . . . . ' • ! . . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I * ) ss. COUNTY OF KAtia ) • , On this. 1,4k4' day of November,1998,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public kr and • for the State of Washington,duly cornrrissioned and rivorn,parsonaily appeared R.S.McNally, to me known to be the Director Corporate Facilibes of Puget Sound Energy,Inc.,the corporation that executed Ire within and foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged said Instrument to he the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument, • . WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this octlifIcats above . i written. • .,.,.....,...,. .•. fk.- „ . ,..., . A. NOTARY PU the of • - • - • , ••. : Washington. IA1 . • ••) : • , •f..io'-•e•,,," • •-i . ..1,YA...y,-„.• • ,. i My appointmerrt .•(-4•80 . .. • ••• .. • <•t •r• . . , s •- . ••y ti LA•• !,F •4 , -.. '.; ...se: ...,-' • -. • :', '. '.• ••••;',,:;.':-.,:,:::•,';:?. •:;. . . . . • • i. ..,._. , .../ . . • l____z.: . :i. ir • . 1 1 . . . , . .. . . . 19■111 .,(.___,'.,-_,- - 1..._•::::::-..-; I i • r;::::.L.:::, • A . :,. I Statutory Wortnity Deed 11118818 ,,, • ) .Renton 18/adv/Tabotl 11/17/98 08:14 AM PAGE-2 • , . , .. . ,••• • . ..- . . •. •:•-•-•f?;:;-•-•-•:.4:1.:•:4.-..•.1•:.;.:-#1•1:','.'f' ,.. .:i.-- •• :•• .....',..-3;•-•.;.;.; :•-•?• •.-.; • . '..r-••-•--ifok--, •---••• ,-• • - . .. . • • . • • EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 3 q m I! q V- _M 3u/ PARCEL A: /gf 3 14— /y—/7 m 5f y R—I r2-3 That portion of Government Lot 10 in the southwest quarter of Section 17,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County.Washington,described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 445.3 feet east of the southwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 17; /L /a-9 thence north 150 feet; I)'7 t/S/7 r/9,Z.D Z Z thence west 57.3 feet; m L/t/ • thence north to the southerly line of South Grady Way; thence southwesterly along said road to the south line of said southwest quarter; thence east to the point of beginning. PARCEL B: • That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,lying southerly of the south tine of Walsworttt'a . First Addition to Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 6 of plats.Page 23, records of King County,Washington,and easterly of the easterly line of Talbot Road South. PARCEL C: • That portion of Government Lot 10,Section 17,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,and of Government Lot 1.Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, • W.M.,in King County,Washington,described as follows: • Beginning on the north line of said Government Lot 1 at a point 528.00 feet west of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1; • thence north 53.00 feet; thence west parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 10,a distance of 232.48 feet, more or leas,to the east One of a tract of land deeded to Puget Sound Traction,Light and Power Company by deed recorded under King County Recording No.817107.which line Is parallel with and 445.30 feet east of the west tine of said Sections 17 and 20; thence south along said east line 313 feet,more or less,to the north line of a tract of land deeded 0 to Renton Cooperative Coal Company by deed recorded December 28,1900 under King County Recording No.200930: f' thence easterly along sad north line to the west fine of the east 528.00 feet of said Government lt; Lot 1; thence north along said west line 260 feet more or less,to the point of beginning; except portion thereof lying within Main Avenue South(Benson Road South)as described In deed recorded under Recording No.2827715. •� Statutory Warranty Dodd l — �. Renton IGrodyflrbatl 11r17Ne 00:14 AM PAGE-3 • • v s r ntG v • • 1111 • • to • EXHIBIT"A"(contlnu.dt PARCEL 0: That portion of Government Lots 1 and 2,Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington lying westerly and northerly of primary State Highway Ado.1,as conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Recording Nos.5732439 and 4924770;except any portion thereof lying within the following described parcel: That portion of Government Lot 10,Section 17,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.14.,in King County,Washington,and of Government Lot 1,said Section 20,described as follows: Beginning on the north line of said Government 1 at a point 528.00 feet west of the northeast comer of said Government Lot 1, thence north 53.00 feet; • thence west parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 10,a distance of 232.46 feet, more or less,to the east fine of a tract of Land deeded to Puget Sound Traction,Light and Power Company by deed recorded under King County Recording No.817107,which fine is parallel with and 415.30 feet east of the west line of said Sections 17 and 20; thence south along said east line 313 feet,more or less,to the north line of a tract of land deeded to Renton Cooperative Coal Company by deed recorded December26,1908 under King County • Recording No.200930; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 528.00 feet of said Government Lot 1; • thence north along said west fine 260 feet,more or less,to the point of beginning; and except portions thereof tying within Benson Road South and South Grady Way; and except portion thereof lying easterly of Benson Road South. PARCEL E: Those portions of Blocks 1 and 2,including the unnumbered bads adjoining the its in Block 1, Waiswarth's First Addition to Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of plate, Page 23,records of King County,Washington,lying southerly of South Grady Way and northeasterly of Talbot Road South; Together with those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South tit'Avenue vacated by City of • 1.4 Renton Ordinance NO.2850,which attached thereto by operation of law. 2 f Q PARCEL F: • C1� That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10,Townehlp 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,`in Wing County,Washington,lying easterly of Talbot Road South and lying ri northerly of primary State Highway No,1,as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Recording No.5754046. All situate in the County of King,State of Washington. • Statutory warranty Deed Inkfels Renton IOrady/Taibat) !JJ 11/171980B:t4AM PAGE-4 • `0I� • • 1111 • agjli=coglagesti PARCEL G: • That portion of Government Lot 1,Section 20,Township 23 North,Rsnge 5 East,W.M.,in King County.Washington,hying Westerly and Northerly of Primary State Highway No.1,as conveyed to the Slate of Washington by deeds recorded under recording numbers 5732439 and 4924770; EXCEPT portion thereof lying Westerly of the easterly margin of Benson Road South; and EXCEPT any portion thereof tying within the following: • Beginning at a point on the easterly margin of the John F.Benson County Road(Benson Road South)which is South 25'44'34-East 934.11 feet from the norttrwestcorner of said Government Lot 1;thence south 0'38'West 389.61 feet to the True Point of Beginning;thence south 0'38' West 109.14 feet,more a less,to the south line of said Government Lot 1:thence south 88'55' . West 183.03 feet to the asetedr margin of said John f.Benison County Road;thence northeasterly along said road,113.23 feet thence north fir 55'East 15724 feet to the This Point of Beginning;EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within Primary State Highway No.1. • • • • 1. 0 • t: •<.S 0'3 r • L st,wmry werraney awe Uddefe , • —. Renton IGrWyflI30.r 4- 11/17/9e o3:14 AM .PAGE-5 • aye _ •�.`,{., +4.177 � '? � . .. . .. •. .ia e�x..r..c►aii 'ir}�f,+sy'plF, . ,..�tic.+:ii?sr,' ,,i�,` '.. 7, ' I' t ; 1 :fit .( �n• l�t?/-1. '+(SS' tlt� j t1: • f a4. l . i •• • g -.R QUIT—CLA1M DEED _ ;iil}r' t• t'• i! — achusatts corpora:lo'n, I i}1l I r': `f • r Suutrn pu,1:.a .... 1..1'Ji11' .l:u.,TA.:1% is Maas ,I 4, { ;,iF,. • ';,,The h°rniu F^JL=. - - grantor .. _. . . tt ,i' • �f I•i t f ill t•.; �.a Iti �� � -- I �•ILIi,• r,a41 - }i,i' t ;1•li-. =loci slaw of Lcacfit: to notru t to it r,•:oNm •„I lnyin•_°I L swl cllttLlir tiva a t 1.•i. tl1 1 .•.'t rpvrlr,un I I,hn•li i.,L,•, u;tflrr 11,.•••:•ii,c.;,:uuP61'.S. Lcl_.:3L'9..:1;:,! q.ci7�•Inu::.a:- LL • thrlugL... .its P I 'd , I 1.. I,. sin!, „f Nl,.l,w „n,fnr n ii,,';!:!r to • i i', to thu(:nuut) ul h,nl•, F • I Il ,. in it Iullt:, lug ,Ir.rr,ln•I rrttl +l:u,• viz ;'I, • I. inlurcnl ' . _-L' All t`:e r.,rn;,Z.ore r1;,5 ' or tl• 'e to that norttoit o: rex Lot 7', �� 1jl �',• • ' at 'f c,',r';,..., of :ov. Lotj,3ee. 20 'rxp. 211 I`. R. 5 1 t11 Beginning • 1' g,W,y,.r thenc- Ea..t along North 11: ' of said Lot, 449', thence ,� j;1 .South 250' thence South 99°45' W. 1.;2.8' thence South 49°30' E. IIt t 1 . `. • ',' .115.3'' thence ::. 99'45 E. 357' thence South 400 feet, thence '11. 5:0.49' • , r; I1 ; • - I. . thence N. 550' to beglnntng, lying within a stri❑ of lend 50' in •� t{ 1,= �fidt<h 30' of such. width lying on each side of the follo•,ctnz described • • Ir• ,t i , 5 • center line: t 1 Beginning at St. 19+74.09 of Sur. No. 1009-d, Sec. 20, 'Cap.23 i1,rr •_, %`,,,, ':( -N.A. 5 E.'R. '., thence along a curve to the right having a radius -. tl�' • •.�r,l. 'of 573.14' for •• •'!nt',nce of 419.63' thence S. 42.45'S0" W. a 1`� +, * . _ :-afsfance of 15.3?' thence alonr3 a curer to the left having a radius tI; bf 573.14' . a distance of 196.83' Sta.�24+9-e..13 = Ste.. 25.17..5 • il� , .l I, I i ..1 t'; ahead, Tur. No.1009.-d. l ,t 11,f t .1 I11'Ii!',' I Together pith the r1ght to construct sr.:: •natr.tain cut and -_ t IIitl:l••i 1 "1• •. ,efill slope, o'ito'de of right-of- ay. -. • 'i.�111f1ii3[ t :,1 1 Il' ,I lu i ,€:, _ Containing 0.24 antes eo:e o: leas. •• I I•r ,-;•{ ;1 •Ri,;::t-of-way I.F. Benson Road Revini ;r. YL11. •rl::.•,: No.90 iioad. I4 I is 1 •• 1 i!IG`•`t:t ,lit f j';- .I 1;•1Iiii:k' N ;'ilia•IIi`i • 1, . r':_ ^ -•I -.•6 iipit'.11j Al,, c �• t h.I(I'.t t ' 111 I} 1.:14:1:1::-...:.-.'''';... . .. I 1=��',.sGi•'' i �'k..%��'2 •'•i •[).• q/y� 'a i'�i.•� '1 i. • I. "oitvstt•d ;u 0.,•I :,n•v„1 i.III. rn:II,•., ',1:.-Int„+:-.1._ • ''' 'I: 1. • ,2 t �.LL%L G?hJ f " —_ trferMi� '1 ' day cif- t A. I I t - •• j., l, !• is ' ) • — *' L ..... • -• Put Sound Pater. a 116=t Coo.K�Y i;i .l .: 4 • a."{t `•% ... . _ • • —3y . 1-•.t.l„`..•.. --r_. : , . ;1;'li Y :'4 ••,j-•., , 1[ t. ' . a rip', . , • -- .. _ — •Y ,_ 1.0.. • •• Ir + • J� i ;'• •• I taI.i i i ,i • • ' " . . . . • , , • . • . - . •••••v•itnI.O. ' • 1- ... . . " . . •. .„a I!3 , P: • . y • . .. ;. • • ..'.,. . . .;,..:Pi..illii r.' 41;3. i• . . • '.. • . - . ' .'; . , . . 11.c.ki0, .;..2-,, I, .* . • . , . . . . Li!if..11: A :1'..- .1 , • , . 1 {;-ti.l.i. • t. ..1:•,i,.t, t:I.- I:, .. ., ._ .. _• _ . . .. . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . • ,„. :-.......:: 6. • - . . .• •--,., :t:i.. 4 . . . : . . • . .. •.: . ,... . . in,...,;.:-..,,.."...: r,;:t./.....-.)... .„.•,..... ,______--,--z----7 .. . . . .. .. . . ,r.!.-- , v„1 $i-. _:..., •,•••', I. 1::4. i --:•.,...- .1J : '.'1,- . ..- •• I . ..,.:::::1::11 .... ''.. ..:.. '..1:-.I.gT.:•.741...;:;111 •. . •., :.• g i • 11 I! ‘; , • .,.. , , , ,, .,1 . . • 1. . 11, ... II. ••••• •TE OF: WA-S.HltsiGTON I • ' }Ss ... ,.., r i 11.1 ,•,:: •t) , .• -•...•• •.•• 1•• l' . !!- .:, • V; 1:i: iii •i ' COUNTY 0-4!- . _ • ..--.-- .. . . - . - •i. . . .. . ' . . _....... - • •• - -. ---1-;;;i7-;,. "-•-• ____ . - .. . -•••:;. ... __. ; . . % kiV ' T r,,,rii Vli'...1 I I- • ' ' -1119 ...." . - ... .._ ._ ._- . •nF[ I,-T, . .. . • : -`.. aud,,'!--i-rfie State nt•Wastittizt..1,..-v etnii•Oirniittne•l.nn•INVIIro, pi.4•••••rinlly came ., ... . .....'_••• 7.-'.: -.--I - :...... 1`1•10. tiVi•:. , -- • „ -• .---.... ' 1, _ :. . .. 7-111 It I°. Il . , . . __.... -7 • ... .. .... ... ,......1.0 •Iihwt! In ha the individuaL... [I ... • sIgue I r• . . • •i" t• '• •IIT ' ' ' . ; • Litscriberlin and...- . .exepled the Milij .2.,,ti,,„, ,,I .... ,wi,.,i1v,,i Ill me Ihut dAnd '•• -1. i li 1 i'•••••i ;• ; tli! ,, • • • ..•• i It . . !4 . ... - amv.1.,itIe nr,.n21::::,.,,i.ut.ut.f.ri.imn,,,,,,,,,,:,,..its:r,1:1:3t.ir,ririi•it y„,,nrriir:1,:::•:•:11.„.,..t,wIreilicrente:and phrpenen therein ment:i.oned.... ,1..... ••,1 . 'r .! c - _ .. uel • !!•11 ' I..., It i r..r .ri * . - '• . . . ... .. . . . . •. • . . ;•::•„ I.i •• . • . • • .. . . s:•••,rry I` .4:Ill and tin I h u Stilt. a Wn.lifogtert,renitlir•g at •• ___•1..ei li I I .'A, !1 , . ' , . • • •• ••• - . i . II It 1 • II I. . :. *. . t . ...' ' -• .. - • . . . • • ,. . • • • '...''..,...„,. i: •* • . . ... .•. ';'• • ... • .; , II. . ... .. . s.r.,10F....1.A_SHINCITV( ) • •,._4__SS.• •l' di ;'.F: i 1 .. •;I I .1 • Li I' ,. . CCItrf'-'BF.Ii.1 0 . ) • • I - ; II 11 I'ki)5' 1 . • .- •:,: .1 ' • .' .'I'' 'ii:i.1 • i • . 1%! i .1:ii I, the undersiGned, a NotarTTI'ublic in and for the State of Wachin5torti . . . :. ILI 7.:;i1 ' •. ' 1 ,•.i ,._„, do hereby certify that or this :)••5i-day of ••c2.-,..-4,•- , 1934, personally apleared _ .....-,- ..• . _...2.4 1 i .C.:d t : - • • • ,-- . to ice known ••-.. ' 7 -),t .; .. .. before Ice ,/r;•2,6,,--•;/_7(-----;- and utl-,--/....,I 4'7 '•'-f......<e.e (' 2. 1 - a be the Vice ?roc idant int.! A323 i(I tillti :',..`C i'r••-.117 :•US i.11t.:...IV,.IV of the cor" poration,that:.- •' li V l I. .- ... ..;• .:t.gi,,1 • . .. 0y...rtitod the within instrument and aotrnowl,edged said instrum.,-,Kt to be the.free and voluntary act and deeirid o-f2Lsaid-14411-1corpo•ration a),y(d on iroath a teill-ted -thet tilrery werr7Xtjihor•i-Jeld . _ t• . :till IT. •'= I / ": ',,1 1 •• •'• I i :_•E.Ii. I illi, 1 , . . ... ;'.' tu•execute said .114'..1r: ..ar.1..•.Alva th,;t•-••-1•447-3eall.orrixed 11.•the corparC!a eau.l or I.'•!.!;•I.:.liii II ; • 1 ,. . corporation. .. .' . ... . .... _...- - - • • i- . . ...• ' .. - ''''./ill I i.1 -1 . . • • ., . • IIIR! ii _ . 9111•11.ulld!ir-../tt....hatazi..a.nd:-oftltieled-•e ea 1-the 'IT.. t.ni't -y7a6F 1 ira t abase • ,:- • I.. . ••• 11;.iii I .-...--s..-- TTi 1 gi ! . - ..-- ritten. - ••• • ' ..,. • • •• ' • •.• i•-•.;-•-: • ; -.- ' ...1. 11.11•1• . .. . .. • . ....I:II e.1 1 IA . - • .• ` f 1*:(,e,. • • • . ' t.ti I it, , ., • -.....•Notary poAh 1Ic/111,.ilt',ii•L'e d; ll e Si It a.t'e c .;:- •.I Al) Ili 4! i ••• . . - . _ . , • . , Washincton, residtni; a't,..:..S.;;Ttt•19. ••••••••::: .i r. • ..- . l• :II. - 3! i ;•: ' . • • ••" • ••• • • 1 :1 i-'' • ' . ' ' '-• •• ••.-1{ I ) .1.-- !••1 I; 4 Ii•iilit:.1 - - :•.1....... ... .. .. . - •:--;:•-•• fr-I'••• •••• -. ' •-"' •• .•, ••,-Ir :: ' • ....... , ft• :••'ill% , . • .. 1,•il.'•,,:till- _ - '• , -•••• • ,. --- - •• 0 •-- .... .....,..-1 4., -It.. '.. 0 I. .,•----:--. • •: .I ' • •-!• ••%•• 1'1 .'-• '' .12 11111 •;.• .. •,•A•----• -•;11:1'• --.• - ; te, .• • • • II f- , . .. • n. i . • .• ;,... •,-• : ' • . U..I• • . . • ..• • •I 'Ft r ••cy . ft. •- Fi'i.:0:4.1:.,ED - .7•-•• -; '•••.• -.4 ••'-'- • Z - i•• • gE.. •••--•-•-•7•7-.;p-A1E V._°....-...•..;•!!:.Ci").2FEST a F. .'....,‘..•.:-F::::.'......: -4••••••--..---:•0 • l' • 1. '":•gill 1: • ti:•.:'111Y. 'IL **i.1••••-:-.-....'•-•- • , • . :41 4 ,. • .. ......-.T.:ilv „ f. 4.. •• •••• 1 ; ! , c...7 ..1-.. .?•:,,..;. .1 ;; ; , .• yol.I . 111 1 . f -• •7934 fiCV 5 r..1 12 .25 - ' '....'• ': ..' • . • i c.1 co . . _,.•_s-.. 'i,..ii:11.?... • -. •••:•-i:1,- ''''yi ill;I :: • .. .•''.,.C.,•-). • 7. *. . •• 1 * •• . I rir • • . .•..• . ••. •I•• ;•',•1•i 7. ;. Is', ... L._ ..,.•. i . . __. G.EPRGE A.G27,:•,c AUDITOR. . . • .1,.;..:7," 4'.. ....-::-., • KING COUNTY WASH. . :....,.ort.: '' "•• '*-••'N-----",• •'•- ••.1 - ' • -•••••••• I .}. 1-72- ... - . . • ElrFUT.Y • - .. •,•-•• :' 1 ' '• C. fli If ''', 1.'• :• 1 • • - .... L ,..1 -r.-4- • .: . . . 1 ,..... .• 1___._,.. • ., . .•_. .„„‘„,„, . • •••••••••-;,'1,Z1- :1. ' 1 Ile , .....-,•;:•;-,..,:f.t...-44, - ..;71.-.,:-. .: :: . ••••.•::•-.....cl: 1 .. . ! . . _ Hi, - ; At ,. -.. • ..ir ; - ;iii; .. -..crtif - . ,..., s...-c....... ....-:.:•••• ...:- .,... . . , , - .. .•: ":,:gkg.-;:r • ii .-.4...--,,,, ,..4.T.-?..4,-;-;:•,:-..,.:;,...:,..,;,,,,,-::-.4,;,:. . 4 - • • -7-,...--4... • - . ),- ..diddi ,.t..%4Ag....: .•'•• .. I • • '. . • • ... - . ...... : ••t.' .•'''.4122::. . • • . . 7..,_ -:11.1.,i1, . ,.7•ky.:. TWA .I."'" • • :, . .• . .• •• . . • •• '. • 4'. m. .+:: i'•s. r'- • ,Sv�•:•J.1:*.7s3=may •- . s' 'a a t:, Q' 11 Ina M "X.'< ,cit•' •k, 1 • !� •' �• �T --'� CTr J 0 '..-T y. ,. , • . 1� g,1 'a,i;_ ,�'J �Y P v3k,e- �f,..,,,,,,,sL,iFtd }'! '•: L •:ri•_ .i 'I tit Y.��.icrfl•�'T •• • ''�"J'at'".'++`-.1t� r.4• fa C .;:+w. 1 N' .<iF'y:s'T,!-i._„rS'.x_5.7'•, ,l''-'-' .2.:+%%,,,', y,,,.; '.' :ek.v. ,•.^. ale .r,'"'4 .•isa- •^+,i'f '.`. •3�.r_`" •n, Ru f f. e r'�ir'�cC,- - ye y r.. x,.11'.''•fy.GT,,r t'•. . �'�r• �•• '4',f • �.- <i i.r1J1.JSS, _ ':?::',<^' r .i;J. uR %17 •t'•;...5.S�1tl�Aw-•�+yt •o."C, ''fi'wi v1"4 i-?N n�j3._..•','�j it ,'^i�y:`r��,:t: ',,''h�.• 1,. • • (l•' + e•••••.}::r,_„•a' f�`aee, "r't:i:,r••'.: bee -e• ••• -• - .' -•;r.:J31:?.kr�• , �;' — .•n,r..?.:� iip....r.•.,. -..r:, 1� ; -g K 7ct..3s8;t'�o.,',,5- 'toga •t PSFi< . `"' x`.. .. ',., .-`��.�'f,++'•� SL3 i8 {r *o". }fw', , ;;,.�" r".f,, •:{,•:�.baba ; •:'Iis;1•t1F ,.. p tr=i'ta ` s� ' r ,F •ri," ,• .y. ;�s ,.�.•; . .,,m.�oi,,.. Y•�r �ca•�-_. �POt•;�i;d��.I:1HT".GJ;�A,:Y�..a. lx' • ' • • • ''. tor.,•_PQGLT:SO'JBU. ;• t( • �. ..:.A :f .. '• t"' �- *`. -''"'s� Or/A ro4', `r`r-i4e. a"ai•'eiasi•:r f;:'` • -� sa t V ,•..;K140.1 ALL Mt H7 v .J;.y r. kr" ?< '�a; "cs c...® "'' 7• y •of • •:: '•r:.':: ne ...7,2e ...,4', ' tea--•'e ' - •mnd, hioci'.(ett, 00);do3.3. ••-srd ,, ti; •tf-e::', ,i,, r..and,16._CcnajderatioA{otsthe •.k.n -` a ,.,.,...,.:::: •r.'k 1rw f . ,• '-ration,'-fo ,.,.7;;;."._.,- ,, K - 1. ..,,,�, 'r:7:',_:: • • �', �Cori.'4 t ,,,�,,fi,�rr�f�t•+J:�,;., �'t'Y ,?�I�:..ry�•:r.� !}; � •.. - . .. • . . .+;1'.,Iti :..it� bail: :'k-:` ..4,�K5{.�,7':,,1.• ::iY,:-l.-,�;�' ,. Of.•'tta9F,ir1"tOn�j.LhA. , y' _ � '": "'`' ,can M rarrsnta.ta' g �t .•: ;.M ,. .••. •. iderationa "herebr,� en. r ii''. ':.;I,{::i` .�yy�J �.n thew 9a-u•ebl' ..eons , :,„:�n<..,.r-, '�.:� F: C� •.:r . " tad in.Xing Cotiaty,'in:th :State of. tsnhtngton: , ,�Y :,•:- •. i.. •••••,•:::::........: ...•:,.:, following described rob eatatartaitna ,•r,,tt:, _ , , .,"r:.. , ,._k,. e,5fy','!• .0110 - {:l:ri�1.;� r. m',•/,r�`. `P ''r. .t'•,+..r . ® - :, = O':set wtde'on the seat aide and. 1 �C' ` ' - .4,'f," A,atrip of land 214 feet An width,,,,being o h , -tt.to •. •., on •:a vest aide of the center.lines of•Prisary State Highway Ho: 1• "Jct. S5H .1o. ::';y • ; ,r_,};•:;: d.,oter sort acroaa the deecribe•d Par:,l'1 "1.",.:,} 'f .: 1 Jot. P°H Yo. 2 in Renton, as surreys t rr. s :.:.:.:,.:.... Tae.f. T that fr= Highway Engineer'e,Station 225000 northerly to Highway - !rower.': Str'ticn•,'e •y'' 229.71:.4 said !trip shall be 330- feet-in width being 190.feet wide on the ears ride and 1r0;' � `<.a<; ".. `. it nerr e,:::::.• ::. ;eat wile on the wan", side of said center line, L'tD.EXCF.P? that from Highway .•ng• �„ ,, ,.• !:'; stones 229+214.1; northerly to the north line of said Parcel "A" said strip r,*a11 te`I.3 <:,; • i4,.•; • , . 'Sect in width being 1� feet wide co the eaz, side and 1C0 feet wide on tti: wart e of I • :ei': center liras: :. a;•�. . Gorers:rent Lot 1 in Sectian'i0, Township 73 r..rt.l:, ?ar;;e #e? • Ant L " " lien ez t t 1'.n•: r,`' g h s That po ,g at a coin o: the ea owes 'Esginais' I"=�;:,••;.: oft ,..a.1 described as y Road •1[• / * 9;u.?i st" • '', "•:•.: . tte' J. F. Benson County which is :on=La: 1 ). :rr.++t: "•=i` }+::: ... .� . thence e.,, from the rorthwect come.. of•said Goverment feet to the thence •r:TJ i;r:e r '. "' 224.111 feet; the•r.ce :oath 58 55 Test 99.3 - .yk, ='` aaid • 47.70 eve. •� • , ,..;:. • said road; thence northerly alcng road Y : • • of said Go:errefer.t Lot 1.deaeribed'as fellow_: _c _ n r.;j. F at a, 'hat 10rtico north of:t_e -; "'' f:.,e 7 ' east and 2� chairs ti, ar.::h;rt•< c .>.4 • ���'t`i•:'1=°:".. ... at a :pint 10. 1 chains '�' thence,L!:t, i.•ctai ;' rise';,., rr.,• Lot. 1 thence forth 'ej chains; r.s w:�" said ,.Terrains ; ' r • ec•e-h 7.'1 chains; thence east h chairs to the point ofg_rsi. . ;Y' ee-:'-�`... AL°- That. part of' said Government Lot 1'described a:;follower :said •loverrucent Lot;1;._tierce :ci `t: 'c, ,,,,J. . " t, rsl thves`. corr.er of "'; :; ;'. i 'fir, - °c'.ea-t'1i16.1. t::,C.2t 1 . nee .r -{� as. I r. f�pt; th^fi•�norL'i": ;., 6 fewt�:�2s=r+e�:i.�r '•mot • ,,�i. : rth'•:99 st 261i' , -• a,, a .t ��et to the :r a *Dint of beginning; tierce ro eP- ' ,,,. _ ivrk ::: • f west"I6� fret'• thence scitts;.Fg' xeit 2Elt'feet; t=�arc.' ., - • }� .i:iti= :YR" thence. north 0'28' ' tagLnnir.. v '? '7_' eat •16S feet. to the.true point of ';' �� : '. a; • ..ii.._: :',r'.,.}r. : •. !J: t of said Goverraaent Lot 1 described:�e''follo.s: -.n :e '' �•"=�ry . - , p.'-",C, That Pam' 1 •* L:: fit nt.;:: ,, 1 4. ,, - - - k.r:CF: f.0:: '..U. M 5C l! `. �:,,:�:ya•.M r,Crne^ Jr •^�d u0Yr,27.?l'nL't4t. ;, ,•� ,,;t a i' the J.•F:VCoc .i;. 4-a..e.;: t 24: v east ;:+r.11 feet to the easterly line.!. :?enl�n C t5" i,fa 1.s e r.,'.,.,'' ' 0•-8' west 726.h1 feet'te.the.'true point•of ke,;i:ni:.; sc` " ram,'.r. n" A''.wrst,11:5.20 feet; thence seuti:°��75''•west 'la'�:2i:`•ire to s',, • ;,. el ly ails said • ..d iG•.0 1• ra;••)' ,.�; c'' j cuslert� line cf •aid•road; 'thence'.^"or` 1K =a F:'j:: .,35 feet to t;,e.tr:r•point:of tegienin ;. ?- c ,�s'': ``` t}Ft: a north 90'S$' east 59 i JI:'' of;said Go�c,rnrs:ent',Lot`1 described a_ fol1ears: {rd ;_ "rat ALSO, i1:at, portion e' correi . { '. •. ' r 3 chairs east'end':.73:chains;rorth;'ofitle 'sosthw sty :,;.;:. ' *ry .. .., • of a rdGoner r1 'chains�' thence�no t.i 2 :cha'_as;• �i se�!..� ; 1 of -aid.Gov ernr..ent,Lot l;'thence:west.h ;'• thence + �i.4:.i n= e..+ 't .,,, , 'r:�? ' ence'!cuth:`2- chains•to_;the-.po.ir.-of.bc•, ,, l,c - ;,...: f;•t•: - thence rant lJ c.Rins;'th �:;.. njr t ,,,.�- ; 4 • • EXG=Pf CoLnty `pad; , • si {:fiae..r7•:.'s+:c,,; a:tire die..: r:' t a • :t: t.l:...,..::...�..,:., - I;H:s. . .. •,..,,';;i„! - 'r`- `i•. •t 29 feet o. said,Governirent,Lo _ yf,,,. '!.',;_`' �•{•�;;,,y, •,+$,_,•.;:;�.. i ALSO,.the ep $ ::: : - • 7. ;f'Ilcwe .,e�cin_• 11 �....`�t iI` - ALSO tt>zt .p d Governsc<nt Lo:`•1''}describe3R:as..•o :.,. .e rr�•:.. ` =3 ortion of said %f it �. i '.t'' '' d`Govermnt Lot 1;';ttenc�e''east-:u :':: F: f' ',z - -� at theymrthwest corner..of� aai • '�'"•• , ; .y'„ I'i li fend ' '.=east,232'116.feet;' t:,r-n°F"::`;1 aia. t�yr+—elF--:, t ' ��: (��� 1 feet; thence sotrth.760;•feet;`.ghence,;::crt�;:89..k5,r, . . '� the ::;ram e..., { • - ""''`' '' • I.::::'' .Sour' h ) feet; thence w--.st 630.h6,feet;,thence ,north..'-40•Ceetnto• r•a.'•.: ""..R ,< ., :City''a" ' '� .,, ._ oinb'of beginning; EXC. 'e T Co':nty.Road; situated„in the ;, a +_•••� _ ball• :-..� ,i . ._ e i irlat r'cor ed .in. .; I Arai 2 in Bleep 7 of P-enton,' is`pe',_•-„ , • • '•i y"•.. I " - ALQ, 'Lots 1 ,:at a,..;: :+i: a< ,'- 4 Flaa cn'n:l a 135i records•of-sai Co , :•:a ;.n ;;j%. ��., .k;. ,) at•." '" ttse,.•followtn�'described Pare p. „� .. - '. A:i7ALSO,•all that, porti.nof. 5 �' 'de''on:cac'.: �dr�•',t'�? :": • ' of land'151,feet.,in`;widttr•be•rigs feet;F;. _ , "7..' s s:4'4� '-'�'. within•a:strip •r f i; yi' '.� - ,,,.';�:.... said'Prima :State.Hibl.rayrho:._ --r'.:•t� r. • the center line of 17 ,r.. :, t , rtt' .M1, o. :cam ..,• .. / r 7. ._ :.alai:• •'=ii,'."':::. J, - , 'Yip_� n _ n 'alas • /; Y,1• Fla. 1^... 4 a. q =f 1 �a r .1rN,v,. r" tt r••i. a. � - !a 4fi`r f, �g� .r. ,:r � l r _ �,1•,r�" ,;}:: _.. .. �.., it ... . , 7 .. _,. ,._,.- ._.. ...:.. ., . .,.�I?�:! '!i'U'M.i^.,. • l , - .Y 3 .- ',mod- n• t'e, - .y Q b r �.6 ^ m L_ • _ .,VOt2,gpy FA5112 ; . '^• south of a line drawn from PARCEL "el Lot 1, ECCEPT that portion lying = - °__-: the southwest corner thereof to a point on the east line of ;.. said Lot 69.2 feet north of the southeast corner thereof, and :� — r a. 0 that portion of Lot 3, Block 3, ?own of Renton, and of Tract a-t. 44, Plat No. 1, Renton Cooperative Coal Company's Acre Tracts, N- lying north of a line described as follows: Beg feet innoringoattao int on the vest line of said Lot 3, 25.� :`1 southwest corner thereof; thence north 89°09' east 80.96 feet; thence south 88°45' east 47.91 feet; thence north 35°33' east 37.90 feet to a point on the east line of said Tract 44 which orth of the orner of said Black 3;ssituate int and '97 e the et nCity. of Renton uin said theast cCounty. o ALSO, That portion of the R. R. Tobin Donation Claim, lying south of the south line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company right of way, east of the line _ of the plat of the Town of Renton, as per plat recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, and north of Plat Mo. 1, Renton Cooperative Coal Company's Acre Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 20, records ^f Ting County, tt.F.PT that portion conveyed to Richard K. Clarice by deed dated o : ` •!u,e 30, 1931, filed July 22, 1931, under Auditor's File No. 7hA7',i7.2, and recorded in volume 1498 of Deed', Lai'`: e)14, rPr^-d• 11 of said County. i .e _ Fubject to that certain Road Fasenent granted try Fewet Pm:r.:i Dower .4 Lieit Company to Cladding, YcPean '' Company under dai.^ Roadrase:en. Xraete: ' of A'lpvst 20, 1934 and to that certain � , et Sound Power d LightCompany to !ohn Y. '.'via n;.r. i -- • by i'ih...' P - _ John Y. Myers under date of January 11, 1050, ii. -a lan.•ls '.e`.nr.• conveyed herein contain an area of 8.4 acres, more oreao certainr eo, the -;F-,fi do: ila concerning all of which are to be found within ,. - -i:F 1pca:lon now of retard and as file in the office of the :lrect r of - -../••.;• . (tyr.ttl, and bear!nr• date of approval September 10, 1057, reelsee et),er ,57, and the center line of which is also shown of recordth .4; �l`''� of ',1.)-hway slats, sages Ili and 75, records of said County. . • — " , the .;-antors herein convey and warrant to the State of vash!nt;ton all r:/h f tnwre'•s and egress (Including all existing, future or potential easement- of t. P State Highway inn• 1 �' -' -• arra«, light, view and air) to, from and between Primary aY � 3, :c. S-,' to !ct. 'rfii No. 2 in Renton, and the remainder of said Fereels Is ex:resrly Intended that these covenants, burdens and restrictione sell run v tn tee land and shall forever bind the Grantors, their heirs, saccencors or 11 kt: is understood that the right of war hereby conveyed to the Grantee is now croeeod _ y elertr:r transmission and/or distribution lines of the Grantor at or near i:ir,•hwae P,� •n,ilnee:'s Station 2567/o0, and by a major transmission line corridor extendi•irl from F, 7. •';;.i'V Fneineer's Station 220/00 to Station 232/00, upon which several transmission end/or distribution lines have been constructed and others'are proposed to be con- 11:: Z. . strutted in the future for use by Grantor in its electric public utility busine.a. «F' If the ';cantor, its successors or assigns, shall at any time be denied a franrhisc r: or right to maintain and operate said existing or future transmission and/or distri- :ion lines across said highway, and if the Grantor on account thereof is conrelied P ':'- such future , remove any thereof from said highway, or denied the right to constrict lines across said highway within said corridor, then, in that event, the Grantee ly the acceptance of this conveyance agrees to indemnify the Grantor, its successor• or ass;ins. in the amount which shall be reasonably expended by Grantor in re- F I 4. locating any such lines that It may be required to remove from said highway. • ; -a• • i, .,, -'1 1,i 1l'L,L_2,rl_d . _ . .. . . •----.—--- ••-... •. ' ----.--3.--•"3•,:4--7-----.Tr.•-•••:•;-03-•.:.1-;.-3.-:::f"•;:4.....:--:.•:, !.....,,;:_.,;.i... - - -:••I:- •••--.:.:-, ....-f,i_e..... :.-.:z.r.:c.,...-F-.;-;-0.':..!...::•3i-.--•*: - --, ......;:.T.;.:.-----•?. '----:'.' ':r,.....•S'.7•:-.'-f'.••-.6 7'."-‘_":-.i''...7.-'_:-..'...."..-:'',„:•:-._ ,...,,,t•••:••• ••-•....::::-•-..r.• i.•:•"--::.•:-.-'-_•:. ...:'.." .:2,......14.-7•••••. .•--.,-. ' '''- ....- • 'f--••:'.'• ::,--..<1,_...--..,...-.)••;•_.... ''••=s.r.:•••::.--.:-';•--.rs!--•:-. ; • ...:•.t. -:.''''-7.'"1'471-:' ' ell-".--:'-;'4.-:-.:'''.-:-:`**-.'''''-••':•-.. '....-c-''4.'-r'•-•.;-'•-•••‘•:"--''---'''"•''''"'-'•*.-- •••-•."' --' ...,..----"7-z:-;--7V--'•----...-..- '•17-.-A::r.....---....17....•"_:-.r 1•-....•.-:'•;.•., 1 -:;`.'!'';•!'-''''''-••-:--L--- :.-:-.--•••;.--‘-'";-••-•'"-';-''•*-..-•••-.i.'s''7"...-:•-•:.:-=:-...'.•:':- ':.2•.-,__•:%•;.. .„1-....3:..;;....:5,...t.tr.:•',....le',-,•:--'-.et_ ....'::•.:.;-;:-----;:.-.Ft.•:'•-•-..:7_,..:---,5;::*-!,-: 1..:.-.:.: - . t'•: •. ••5-....-.7-:•:?.'.'....'' '''...'..:*:,..' -::.:.....;1,•:-". .;'3.'': :.:: . :1•-•.1.( .....4-:: .•.7 •_.. . .;'..:.I4::;••:•:-';1- :Y.. '.:^.-.'?.;:.;.'•:;;.-•';-..':•.:-...--..:.::-.-:-:. :.-::::.:1? ;;;:?;' 1...-.•••:- : 1 112:::C:•..4-;••:7:qi:•-4' ''....--,*‘..-.:.:?..1'' ':.....:'';••-:.'S-1;:ii.7',:...--:-••:1- .E.::;:;.; ....,---!!-• . ...- .•.:'..•:....•- •• -: -I,'. '--....F..,'..o. •• :. . , . -- ......-. . - . . - -.. — ... • Vili S ou .:;SF 11--3 '.-•-••: -•^.. 1 .._ :.•:..'.••:..:..: .:.-C• . , ...•• .:•••/;:•::•••i t!....:"..2...t. .•,•••••••:-:• \ • • • • I t ia c..nt.4ers toad and agreed that the delivery of this deed i 3 hereby te•nd•-r”rd :.....7,, ;:.,,......i ..... : c that the terms and obligations hereof shaLl not become binding uron the Sta e o ,. -•-•"II:.•••••••,-;.' ..-*--:-'•' ::::::%-.Z.!'••.• :,',•-!..7- ;-...;•:"7..%•:•i 4•-.- :'' ..*.; " -.4...:::-1.....%. *. •:. .•-,: Ts.. .....'„:;:r- .: •:'' •- ' ••• ',..,at' ' n unless and until accepted and approved hereon in writirg for the tn I., .0:a.•h nu.Le r., DeparteastN...sof Highway a, by the Chief Right of Way Lent Dated Lida ./15-*.i.A. irra/12/X.- iftilg. • 1 ;1« Vt-I fJ, -,.. •et • e.:.•,. 1 -*N ILI a:, • , PF.1" 50'.1411 POWER & LI.',H1 C 'P:.'i• 6,-2a.--;./<4-s-L---.-•--- 17 /i. ‘ ''.^ '1 ii. t GI • 71c• Fr..' • .. - "..-• • ' .: 4 :7..o,-,...•,,,r.::.• •• ... • .), ,: . ‘ `, -1/..?7. ...‘. - -1--....--,,,: -. : •.: . . ..4 aPr eted ' Itit.6 '. 'rt.'d •t'-:.'3.:.:•••3 g••-.:.3,".• :: 3117 If 1Q-Sic:,' '•Tr' ---,-3,0•-trrhl af Righwa.. III '::',..-••A 7',.2.:'' .. .I.•:. • .3"'"'-4:6X. . ' • t:'.7.••-•;'..?., 1. .'.... a i''' •%2:.'. . r 1 ;;•31-:..r.' ',:.... ''- . -A-t...-"!--•''' -.."--:-' II, .,.......,...7,.. .. ..1. , A.,..I.--'.t',1;:''''''7.• ...; . ' • - . . .*F1.1:•:;'...-..'• •: -, ' ) :::,14::::':.f',::'::••7.,...;,,...• . %...1.1.51''';'.*:::‘`1-.- - .. • iC 7./.•. .„• /4,7":a.'°'4 •'-'9jV r •• • • • •• :. 1:2 ••• .....-• -• - EnTt::,-i.:.--:-...,:-.::.•:'.::_.... - • , ,. . . . - • --...,-;,7,•e-.- •••:,----:- -.• .1-, r• •, c•:._ :.,...:•-,-,-r-..., :.: ; - •.• . . " . 1 . • :-. - • ... ... • , ..- a ,: c.r7_. _.• : I • , . • •• - • • . -;.,!"..-,.. • ...' - ". - -4;2::'•::'. ;.7 -1 - „. • . 111 , . •'*::',",i;t: ',-' •,..i• I p-,--,-(• ---- - 'i.:?•-,,--......,..---- • -;.-:-.::::'-'.;--7.e• • -• •;'----_-'.-:• . -• -•• II _ • 1-''';'''..:•':".-:''"_.- • i -:."'".:-.• :,-{:7;4'.I 7.,.....; • .,;...F.3.:3:,-_'. ...•--• .' . .._. :.-,::::'-'.' - "'S- ';i:-. r-) ... .• .. i - ... 37.-'.:33-T"._',-::-.--2.:.--.: Z.-. :I s • 171. ' 1 .'-;:-:-;".-:"- •''".._-:.?:".7 .. ;. RECORD CU • A .' - • VOL 4.0 = • • "Z PGe-------... al .- - '',,•'' .• .- • '.7.) -.... .....,.. CG , .: ...••REp,,,------.... .cST a -..- cu lik.:::::-':. •-';-.= ,: — . . 1'558 vi -• i•-•• -;.-3.---:;_...----:1:.,.•.....: •-• -, ---' A.v i/ 33 e3 (...) `:::::::.:'•-.:..--..*: . c ,. - • . c.) , --,.;3--;...--.-....._3..... . , s% ,_.>..<,...... t. ., . ..... ce ...:;-,4.-3-:- - .• .._ . , , d'.. • - .-;: .-_____ LOt.wi y iv,Zs.1 fs.. . . , 8 . - ... _.. .. ....-- -- --- -----o-:•• -- ;"--. f : •1 . • • i- •,••-Ur r ..... ..._,-, 7 i: I !%..'•:.;••••'.''• ."'' .::: f •,-. .:.-.....;7..••„,••.- 1-: 'I H 7--•..*-•;- ..":. •.;:--;-- ) ....7-...•.;-•.,..t•....-.-...•:.•. , _ ....•-•14'-''',...•.'.::.-....•. "..' :.•..•:...-,. .--.-....r- •. - •' 1 `, :;:•-•-:•-.:: -•:-.4;. 1. - .• • '..-•*" • :',",• '..""- • . ,-1--Z.::::-.....,:::•:-. J „„,.,_•_._... .. ... ...., .......„..„, •......4- • • • :) • •-• -.w••F--F'Lc-Yn"'•Y iM , -,4r,i.!i- j, Y+m,.r'` I/.• 1 •-S ; _ ' --_ • ,+,{y. ;1..i•y.-c«y.'„1�,o„yc.rt v,� .e.war .r.. •, ^;s 5.'?;,�ht...Fe VA•R:, i.i�:•' .. • .: 'vot.4630•PAGE U46 • 5732439 QUIT CLAIM DEED LIMITED ACCESS ' `-' .- - IN THE MATTER OP Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSE No. 2-21 to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton ' ,; • KNOW ALL MEN � P[FGET THESE SSOUND TRACTION LIGHT 6, That the Grantor, CPOWER COMPANY, a 4 • LIGHT COMPANY, formerly " Washington corporation, + 10.00) Dollars, ,, fo= and in consideration of the sum of - - TEN AND NO/100, - -. ($ and other valuable consideration, conveys and quit claims to the State of Washing- ' ton, the following described real estate and any after acquired interest therein, •e situate in King County, in the State of Washington, to the same extent and purpose . as if the rights herein granted had been acquired under Eminent Domain statute of the State of Washington: a All that portion of the following described Parcels 1 and 2 lying Southerly and - _ Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the center line of existing Secondary StaState Highway 2No. 5-C at Highway Engineer's Station (hereinafter designated H.E.S.) SSH N H.E.S. 29+ 0; • thence Northwesterly in a straight line 50 feet to a point opposite 5-C 29+50; thence hHeE.S.1SSH No.straight 30+00nethence point Southwester2y inich is 0a feet straight Northwesterly opposite5-C, tienceoSouthlalongpthetsection•line approximately5240 nTe Chen 1 the end of this line description. • ALSO, all that portion of the.following described Parcel 3, lying Westerly of ex- isting Secondary State Highway No. 5-C, Southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and 120 feet Southeasterly when measured at right angles and/orMr dully, • from the center line of Primary State High y , No Jct. SSH .. ,' • No. 2 in Renton, and Easterly of the following.described line: • Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of Talbot,Road, 160 feet Wesy erly, when measured at right angles, from athe center el line of c existing nter line, to a point State _ Highway No. 5-C; thence Southerly p posite H.E.S. SSE No. 5-C, 36+50; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a point opposite H,E.S. SSH No. 5-C, 38+00 and 90 feet Westerly therefrom; theo. nce } Southerly parallel with said center line to a.point opposite H.E.S.he SSH Ny line of _ 41+00; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a paint said existing Secondary sStaState eiHighway No. 5-C opposite H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C 41+50 and the end of this lineP ALSO, all that portion of the following described Parcel 3, lying Northwesterly ' - - of a line drawn parallel with and 120.feet Southeasterly,Statewhen Highwaymeasured No. , Jct. attlright angles and/or radially, from the center Sine of Primary 53 - SSH No. 2-M to Jet. PSH No. 2 in Renton; EXCEPT that from Highway Engineer's Station 216+00 on said center line, daid petal- • o; : - lel line shall be drawn 140 feet Southeasterly therefrom;EXCEPT any portion above described. , ler -e•• ,un ""•••? . i PARCEL 1: „sk. ., • - •,! ,`• a. That portion of Government Lots 1 and 2 in Section'20, ?. � �� Township 23 North, Range 5 East,'W.M„ described as follows: • t'• ;' `+•':t? ' r.rR:., -• - '' Beginning'at a point 1140 feet South of the Northwest' ;�,,,il,i, .,•• ri corner of said Government Lot 1; thence South along the 31:rme West boundary line of said Section, a distance•of 453.27 • r feet, more or less, to the Westerly line of King County• -i�� r �‹� Road No. 80 (now known as Talbot Road)•thence Northeast- '_ C ;7 j . i-;;,* ee'y along the Westerly boundary line of said road, a �� - C�i; distance of 905.95 feet t° a-point which is North 89°32'41 East 219.91 feet, more or less,'distant from the point of • • beginning; thence South 89°32'41".West 219.91 feet, more• _._- y� 1 or less, to the point of beginning; • ' XCE ! IO+'t 1' I C .`1 Sheet 1 of 3 sheets Parcel 1-SSS - - . r, r • w ,,, 4 ..--T+.0 Huwa't^^ '�c7.w+f,"•.9s�•;!x .�•.r-..,—..—�..:..;,"— Y,.' _ - .. _ - . Y!:.,'..'.T�:. .... -......ter ..-_.y_......_r..r. �_.-... _..-r ..• {� `.-'.. .1 - VQl453U PAGE�4 I ,, PARCEL 2: ' • That portion of the following described tract lying L.I] " , Westerly of said Talbot Road and said road ext''nded Northerly merging with S. F. Beason Road (Secondary • State Highway No. 5-C): Beginning at the Southwest corner of Government Lot 1 "r., in Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.li.; running thence East 416.46 feet; thence North 660 feet; �. thence West 416.46 feet; thence South 660 feet to the - • t ' - point of beginning; EXCEPT portion thereof lying within the above described Parcel 1; PARCEL 3: Government Lots 2 and 3 in Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.=i.; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying Northwesterly of King . County Road No. 80 (known as Talbot Road); and EXCEPT that portion thereof described .as follows: Beginning at a point 200 feet North 88° East from the 1/16 corner on the hest line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; running thence South 0°48' East • 778 feet; thence North 88° East 280 feet; thence North • 0°»8' West 778 feet; thence South 88° West 280 feet to } the point of beginning. • The lands being conveyed and quit claimed herein contain an area of 2.30 . • acres, more or less, the specific details concerning all of which are to 1 be-found within chat certain map of definite location now of record and I on file in the office of the.Director of Highways at Olympia, bearing date of approval Septe`ber 10, 1957, revised March 6,.1962, and the center line of which is also shown of record in Volume 2 of Highway Plats, page 186, records of said County. • ALSO, the Grantor herein conveys and quit claims to the State of futuresh- ington all rights of ingress and.egress (including all existin , • or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, from and be- tween Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSE No. 2-11 to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton, and the remainder of said Parcels 1, 2 and 3; EXCEPT that the Creator reserves the right of.reasonable access to the relocated portion of Secondary State Highway No. 5-C, Northerly of H.E.S SSH No. 5-C 31+00 and Southerly of H.E.S. SSH No. 5-C,36+25. • It is understood and agreed, that the State will issue' to the Company such permits as nay be necessary to authorize its employees,'agents, • • . or contractors to enter upon the right'of.way of the State, in accord- ance with the plan for ingress and.egrese designed for said highway, t. to the extent necessary to the essential maintenance and repair of the Company's facilities located within the highway right of"way. • The now existing facilities of the Company shall be permitted •_o remain .- : within the'right 'of way of,said highway as now located or as elonated in accordance of the construction agreement executed by the Farties here- co: Should it become necessary in the future to .alter, relocate, or re- move any of said facilities from within the right of way by order of the � ..' State, all costs for such alteration,,relocatioa, or removal'shall be borne by the State. i!.3C. ' LU ;• Sheet 2 of 3 sheets - e..• Parcel 1-558 rn :......,.- ., . wa,• i :- . • . H.--. . ...- • . . . . . . . •.. --," r - .: . .. •• ...: •:' • • • '7••.i' • '.., . .. -. . • : - • I'. • : .. .• ,..,1-, --.....• . . , . • • • :" . - — - .• . .. - -' •-„ • t'•••• ‘If.:..• • • '•.:•-• .•; - • •, - .• • ' . •.• - - • • - ' te.,4.i.",...... --lerlf,„•••1.,_:%;,_.......4„_,,,\•••11....,,.....,,,,-,,,...... ..,,'..4"...`...!"'.::'", •;',1:•'7 ...•':'''.."•r'.',.•••••••••• •-'"-.....,7-.•-• •'•,•••••-••:•-, .• .,_--:.. , •..•.,. - -. - • . - • . .'---..i.:V•two:14.a.p.:Iti.,,,.,,.,S.4",-,•\•"••,,,l,f,rtrAi,. ...ri.r.4:iira.1.t":11.‘,'..,,r-z..1,...4,-,_••••,ii.e.c-:11....4,;.,,,,-;,,,•••:...,:,-,,,,.,...,,,....“-:•.,.....,,,.7.• .'"-';.:`1.,....--4-...,... ...,..,..• ,„„, ,... „ • ,• ,• ..L.43',..,,,... , i'''''... 1.-•••:.•.'..:,7,.„;,•-,:.... ',....7'...4..... •:'•‘..''.-.'-f.:'1;2.;"t1:.5':?. .: 5'.g..).tti;..."'•'i'?•-•7.4'::•"1;e3:::.ii:IV,F.1•:.4.i.e.F.:;,1141:,.',iifii.;.''';''S'itijg4tg.:••,,,31.,5•Att•ttfri,?-ft:j4.'W..?'.,7•,, . , ' •',/'t..: • • J ..:-•,..,,...1:VV:4193,trirt.r.6.644;F:',,:.:11.`ill, '''`.:41,,k4.:;,. a .."1!Vomp,• „...,•: -•....—".7f.'•• ''•'4.4•;•-'4'''''-`'.''.. -•-•'.'7'•-a-Til.f.,.`.-i,1,1:1-e...4,;,,4•4e,Erv:P":.;. ` •`•• ". -- • ...4' • 1}..• „ "....4), ..,.. ..•- .1.:.....Z,I.R. . •17„ut U18t••••^.'''•'.•,t'.;.,'i.•••1•.•!.'''>:••5•--u'•:;4•••:•-43.,•f','•*4::?e'''"•';il-:•.;".:•'-;•'''.--f4.,s.,24-f:..5'7!.''.r..q..:..•,;-,•).z-''''-''':.'4F,*,,._',:::'..::;.,.•,...,,-.'W„.4r'r'5c'W.-•r,al..,,; ,..r.'1.'"?''' r'•,It'''''.'''••,-; 1;,--•-•.f.",.s:44,-r•?;',: `••''':;••17''.•':••''•••1•, & . • • : ..•7•.•• ...-:-.......•to-•..,•.•••....,:-...•..:.:. .• ...:Z.,...-:`....?.:-.':•'.'....-:• .•;.:',.1.tY.•1:','•::•s:r; ;••;.F,,•,-_•••5,,•.:.‘.....t,..-1.Xeiti,.5-t.41^/41.,45;-,..,,37.1;47;.7-''*f.:..1'4n,-,,P1'?'",:a-!..L.C''.•.'.4‘;...'.;.j',;.•;...4?!.=1:',1.1''iF.. '7...".7.:•:•.‘41f?'"'", - • ', • ‘‘.,k.:Z:•. • :Jr/.• : •• • 1,:il- ..:,,.'..1.:::"---.•---',,-•,-',:••..:.i:.••a•'-;;:•.,:es.'7 4;:ii:••••;;''-'-•••,'••:•::.;.'4-yliz•I'.%•.-.,ei••,••;•lipp:,,;''.,-,t.,........r,i,i,;•i.„.,41:.-4.;•!..,..•-,•:•.,.•••••...:•,:-.C..".;•'•'''•i••,..4ze 2'4.-.•-•'•;•,19%;.,,- ' • -•••••'.••.. •,......,,,,.,:•••:.•-.••...::.,.....-p...!:.••ii.,,,....r.,,..j.,...:;...,,175,',....,•,...,...,.?..-,0,7t4,-.4•?;:n.7,..i.,,,,•vie.,4:07;,,-r.•;•.1:•..,:,-,--•fi:':.”..;',,,,:'••,..,,:.•:•i•`,..7.14.•',•;:.•;-•',:.:-.'. •:•,;!•:-•,••••••,:,..,•,,,,,1 ° •- • •- •-,„.... ,4..n'. • .: • 1 • •. •"•...: ,, Y.:I:::.4.,".?.....,•,,i;',:-..iCi,r..:;..'.:•.:f"."?.:.:....,.1.,4.4t,t`,,:,P,!.i"•1•47,',.!.`•;-7,.j..;':•:t.,,'1.1 2.e.....^.:,::-',.•••••••':.:':•••'.•"•• ••••'•-••'-,',•••,.....,,.,..1 •'•• • .. •,- . 4.4.!'....' •••• ••• •..,.. .• - . • -', ... • • ••••• • •- !•-•“••••••••••••;•,-7.-10,4•>..,:z. 4:•;••••-,•••!-,•••••.1,.....,,•:•••••.•:;,.•.•,...,.:,..,.:....,.:. ••• . 2 . :. . •••,...,•,...x.1.4., • - It is .understod and .•sgr.eed;betite•e,..f::the•J,rtztei....heid. .t.:at:...........-.• :,:.:,...• . . •-....:•1 ..- - ... . ,,• .4k.,,.2,.... . -this Conveyance ChaLl not...talie.i.tiitre'f', ,etliat"•••-• ••••••• : ••••••••• ••••-•• ' • :. A''•-;"...-•' *- .- . .• - •t•'-'"-:''''...''':•• ,. . ,A.. ..q ,-AI: ..:.. ..,-no7 tit...1.e-shall '•'' • • • . -i-.JI...-.-'. . ... _. :.• -. - ;ass liel.ulder•imti..1..t.heit'Gi-aitar:'lie.rtii..•'lad'•12 ••''''•'''••••" •••-•- •••,..r--••.•.• -'''• ' • '•'",..:+1 .• •,.,....-... ..... ....• • for the'cost of-relocating;'It is £aciljtj.e c'-'9.rda••-'--,•:•!,nth.."'" .7.. ......:.''''• ''• . ••••••''''.'s - - • ,..,. -toe utility relocation-"acre-'nt`-'' ' '- -'.+7,...:e. car- heretot.,.ITIcee3"s ..... .... . -.• , - • ''•1 ' •' ‘e. •..."-;•-"•:':::::::•:x.:-:'•:••••.,/-4:1---..::•:.,..:-.:.:.:.-_-........:;:t..i.,r4,, .. .7 • '..'' ••.•.. • . .,. •, . It is and .stood and sgreed.,-that:zthe':deli.veri.. - ei••••:.:'-'4.•?:-.71'. .•...... ,: -...•_,.. - , .71--.2•'-'1.'...;:....' . . her eb.y tendered and'that..-the":•'•ierm-e.'..;and.''''. ....o.bliget...iiins......:hier eare s'hal.l.I. .. •'':. •• -• .:,...., . :-.ot become binding'.upo. ri.thes'State-•..of..liashington''uniess and until. ••.:-' • Co . .. - - .: accepted and approved"hersaii'Irf writing-tor the,:State Of..:Tfash-•i:kr' DcP--rt r'elt of 1:ighwa73/.bY the Chief Rit,ht-'e•f:'.i'ay....A.cte, nt, ".• • . ,.•• on, • :.•-:--. - • - - .,44.-:•,:•••• •,-.• N. .. _ • • • • • •-,,,. . •,-., . - ..../2-,. •••• '''•'•./ ....::;:••..' ,•'• •' .• • • o.: - ---,-,...ae.c..-.,,...-• .':; 196.4. • , • * • ' ' . ,,'•'P:. ' ".....-..,'.....k,:-.- ,.."'• .„...." .,,,: •. ‹- •,.puLT.L.:T•SCOND 1-T/11_1R --: .L.....7'.'it'i'• t.,^r.i...•..'"..t. .: • • • . . •. • ' ' ...•:;.i.f. ‘• -'.••.: .... - 144.%:::•;-.. • • • •T7- . • '.-7'••=''-' '*- •"'''• ;: .:4e•-••••t'•,;.z,-. ., . .. ; :,•••••••- . • . • ••.Yie resident .-: 0.perCtion-s' . . .---' p ...%•E - •.:.. '. •- glkyrr • ::;'•'' •: ..".:• . :-- 4.1:";•.V. • . .3 • .6-, • ... ,....:•....•, '•,)/* 1 /. -,? . ."•!.;,.7 -•*,-. - . 420:.,:-. • ,..:-. • . . ' (•••• • •,-, 1 •••••/,..c 4-•c.'•••r 7 • ' • • ,••••.•-•i.E.?ii •:,'•• •' .';•.• • '(;4:*stiii."'..::•... •" ';'' • . ; . • -. • , r.i....;.... *.. 5.- . i '.':•',':. ':".•••"..'•.•;';',1';'•:: • . ',OA yi.;!....; •-..' . ,, . ... . .. 't. '•:''.•j; 2.ccopt•::(i a :. a:•Fro-,•:..' , • ‘• ...i. • -:si.• ..!'v;••••' .4:.0... ...•;.-T.'.....'• ',.•.•• 7', . ...4...:•• . . . • •. . .. • • . •t.• . ';?;'..•:; '••••••• Z...... .'T'17.")" • .... •• -r.•••••••,......... . •1,i?i G-. - ;. . ........ • '.•:--•.: ' . .: . • - • -:-.,:.. .-" ' ... • . • • ....),..pc.rt--.•':,.'.:. of "...'.•.:.:::—,* ' . --,.0.11 . -... !-,:..)1 ‘ .::•-1; •- -''''• . , le,.:1'.'''• • .. ' •, • , •• • ......,',;e7.\‘':',It.2 '‘:"'‘...1.• • ,..1N• ; '• .. -_.•... ..t.F.f., ..:.-- ' . '' ). f : •_...?„..,----;.;i'" . .. • • .- . • ". ')'• 4'i a i•i;.,!‘4.- . .":.;;Iii,'...•'.••• . . ,t.ei"4::••'• . . ;•7!: „/""e--...,i', 5;--1.,-...-.V(.?-1-(-L/'''' ;."'....••-...• ".•'"' ' •, -?I ...,)'• ' •,-"S';•!, -.'- .••".. • ' lq-c^..!'::,."" . •-..."r.4-e- v-:..,.;'n t ...f e.a-..- .k....,..., t. • , . . . . • ',1 -Ailk.'• ' . ,,,.... ... • '..,....: - - • 43•-•s7f•-•• - .•, ,.• .;-.:. _ '...t:,wi•:!:•." • ,.',-,?; .' -• • . ' f.,•7•1::•:' ••• • • -. • . • . • . • • •• . . '4" • '- .. . ' ki-g•t7.:''.'.• • .. • • . ' . .31.',1 _% OS' .,-,LSf.r.•::17,-•: • 'I • • -' i..--- - •-'••• --'•• •••••••!--;•••:••:. '.......• ••:•••,•••,- ...•:-: .2•;1•..".•••;-7. `.'."'.''''''-'! ______ • ' , 41,;;Fl.....1:•.;...1.-.7.• . ..:. . • . 1-. .-..,..... • ....". C7'-,71" O.F A-'"---9 .•• '- '''s- .''."'" ''.....' '''' '',''''- ' ••"- ".• "...-- '• “:- '''''..• .••• ••••'1'fiK‘g -" , . '`Plit,--'4,:st .'..7' "‘-•" ,.. . , .•. • • 7.:, ';', . • ^ a.4 ..::::.*iet...'"="ai'ei."',..•''' •0 7-•-4'ie.': of. ' ..-2 •••• • .• "::.".:.•-,-,...4.--•-•.!-,-.,..,,.. ,,,•.n.r!..%:..,...'.•• (..:. ...",.'• ,••,:., ....-.','.;.....,.:'....fi; , . ., • ':<4.tir'',!,r.r.•!..,•,...,..4.„•'..'''..-.4 2.C 4-.• 5•.1.7....,r•'caforo me• '^ .-'• 1" '' • • ' '-'''''' :-'' ' •• .4"s`::•'.•;:::• . - a; - t - / -2-1--1-...- - • .."e_e ..' ',arid ,.•'••:',.:.•a'>g.'' ' •'• -• •• ••••.•- •- : .. ,1. .: •. . .' 'tig,'.;,:;';'.•-•".••. , . .. . .. to me kno:."( ...a•sce. t:-.9-71,... , ,...4...__,_.; zi....i...i...;d. '' ''• ' -- ' * • . :•' ::' ...7.‘'.?* . ..-.',, .• . !,:... . : . . . '..:.• ,o.f. the cor--,.orat.ion..t*r. .at.execnted,.trie-.23' re.;:,,ir4..... _,-4..in::::Sitr. ..?-e.e. '",.':•:,;,:;:•:ar.. d...:::,:c..;•.27' ..C.:::1-2:1•••::::::'.....:•'..:::::::.:::!.•;...;:*:;',:;.4.:-`cl:551..: .-: :-- -'-. .. 1..;72:4::r......7;t1.:':;‘;';'":::•::::.•::':'::'::'• • :4.........-1:•••:,.?••,,k.,•,•:..:,• •....r..e.d.'.•:,:..--3 :mid instrnnent',to t..2.;'-tli. 6.'4.ries•e*. aMd••••.- ;', ..::::• • . • . . ., , .x..u...es..end:-.r..---ncaes-there' '' - • • ' '• •••I : .'•".•;.••••'••••••••`-':'_..te-:: - :":::-,:•••••.1 ..i....... . / oat:-; 5-tata,4 un-= •- ./ .3• .,..... .,:_-,,,,,,,,.. ::...,. ••.,;.„...,„-LP,,,me.:::.2.or.ed.;.snr.,. r•--, •••••'•• ' •.,••••'•:.',.'. . '• : 'Ca:.f.mi.::,')..-..1,..::..:;-: 't''' - ::•'— '_1..." , _A-14-_,,,,fc..Ztt.t1104....."ze....1:1...'it"..b....4.6..46, :q...g.""ie. .',...„43.-"ci...;..i..n":'s;•+.4..,...;.;:„;,.,"t';:-...-.,._ .....',;.-,,,....t,.,;,',.':•,V. •.--,,. , ., ..,, 1,40,,..,;,..,%,,..;,....,._?,3.::......_...i ,... s.t.le..cor-po-Fite. raiea,1.-.‘o-Palii'•"••- '.:-• •- ........-....• ....., :•• :-.•••••.•-•:•'''' • •• and that-the%zeal af.t'i:.:e. : .- . . • ';:.....• . . . • • ., .. . . ,•:,.;.•••,...'".••• .....1';,..(1,;•,,,..;!..;',4:.:•••••,•::, 7•1!,',.....,;...i.„1.:;,•:2„,,'ci;,,,D,'4••••••,.. ,„ ,;---:,.,,:°..O.r..1"or'.0•.jm•07-1'.,,::.„;','•; /........"••••,,i".K.&I•_.,gil - - — ,..*.j.r•.,:itil-i!....,,. •.:.,•:-.. • •••:........:.•, • • •LI.1-7.--_,i1 n2„:7 1....a.d.•.a,a,•0".h.,..,jf-',.".t.,•;:•:T::;::.c;•:-,:4?•;.-...i.:4;',.iFf.'•;v.;fg.t.:••-•:,....,...F.,-.4!'.,:.:.(.471..;•7:,?;• ::::p4i:;;•:...,•-•:,,f...4f:-.•:'!.,,-''..-2,'.,:.:•.:::..4-.:;-2:4 ,k4g -.•,- -,'" • . -,4.71':4Fi!i•...fi.'.1....'.•:, • •. • - 1.1/.4 ti• -•,,::-..•' •,`.'•......' •...'.. ...,..•-. q...‘'.`17:.j.1.:94-;;..tr:• -Y.d.a.t...ar42.yea_f•:1`d'6I,... ,,,•:.••,..t•It;•;11'..t....V••-•••-•':•-••••••;.:-It'-'• t' ' . • l',.•'•"-.4'L••:.2:•-"%';'::•!:`!.'".... •••••-• • •••• - ,.-,• -.•• .--- .4.-•'...4.,••••....-"'.'••"."-'•"'":7-'t••••'•••,,-`4.faN:',...1'.',:i..":•.:•:-.1:1•••••VrTeltSt."'...7%.7-'..4.."•-'•,.......,.,..,Y:',77.:.!%•.:::;"•,,,'?.IV•••••''':-.:'."7••••1-:4:-' '.• • :'- d.,,'',.'''Y.1;•tr.r.t.'•Ar.'‘.7j•',.. - ..i'.'.......• : •:..• ':• .!'• ••... . .S• :-;••:.•.........••••••'.• ,"',.:,:•••:cr,:;•'-',.;;`,7i••••••.••.•,.tt:',.1.4,,,,asr,5;:::eitti'Viii.-a•:‘,:i5,4-,.k;,..".f..7. ,1•;,•:,,%,*:.:. •••,.-.:',,.!•.%:••,;‘,1"."•*.'„,°•.y.''.,1:-;q7.30.,•" •••- • •1*.%C.";:•'?..:••.1...,•7''.......... : ..'-', . ••.•• '•::• "...'.. •• . '•••••••.‘.•:•,..V..•••,?•••:-;-"•••".;.•:1;•.•;•••'•;Wl.i. ,'::.',..../c,....317,•, .?„?.,...."...i,;`,",...iY.`...;.;:.'-'2.'-`.',:;•••..,',..... .,,:,,•,•••••.:. :Y;,:„,...-::':'".•':::,:'..,""p.,''''',4, . ' •• ,,,7,:••F.:....,.....:...'',..••.. •. ';..••.,...•:. ' .•'.:•. •'•'''•':.•••''•. .': ?•••'•'''..7•••'::..'•'''.....;.1::•J';''''•:...,'.'•:'' ".:';...'...f';•••::,.0:.4.'....'"/?7‘.1'.55;q: ;2'.1,•.?,!• ?Zigki0i•tl•ti'i.1%?445;:.••7.•••it:1:1•:.•tifi..........0::!*;..T.;••-'r..F.••°'!!:•.'il.....r•• '•1, ..'''7:07.• 1 •. 1:6:.'.,Rirf::,.''...".•.•.!•;,'ft•,... • ' ''''•.‘ *•• .•'''''''''''''';.; '.. • :•...••••::•:. ...•• .'' ••••••••••••'•''..-.....•::•.,...;..t:;:•.••••••••i-..:::0:' ...'....J.11.4.•.:''',..7.•,:;•,":."': ••;,•••.1.Y,'.,,•„...:••.••:.)•".::•-• :.".,.:.'.•-•';.',4"‘• '.; . ' • y.-Ey.1...i':',IT:••'.''..•'.• •:'•••:...:.•••••••••": .::::''\\!..i-S Si://,''.;'':: ...-','•::".''...'• ••....;;;•..:•:••:::',i'•"..."•!•:.''•'::".".;..'"..":"..'''.f='•P";..;-`,"'"•::'''''. ..49..':.....;..P;i4:4477%1:.:;V.',:.';'.:.: : :•"•'"•••:•'.!1'1:-.;':"::•••••.•":41•:,',:i' -',...?..n.. rt7'"•:?•';',..4;"?.:.,,, ; •. .. . -.• .•' -4,,Wi,4'..:.:1 !".',.'•'.;t".1'...f.".:..• 1 :F:2•!;•.'..:•' :'s 11'•'''RI;'''•.e:si''.:-..........:. -.:'•''."••,:••'.•- r" ....•-.7.:•:::....••••"...'f•••• -..:,,,:Li•i•-•••'• ....;-2.-.'-'1,-,''r,•••1.,,,.::...••.7,.:II7,41":•;:r"-':•••.4',.:r.;•;;:•••:•"•:";•:';',41..:,;'•'••••i•••••:5:4i'!...440:,r • . • •szp-i'"I',',"•',:'''''.7‘1•.*••i,••.e;......• . ,,,?.....;::t!. .1.4....,•...1?•.,••••••...i.',..•,.*:?_,,.--• ..'•'• •:„..•...,••'. .•,'',.:::::.:-,•;.•, ..5'..: 1 ,- • --"---"-'-•-• "-•-•-- '-'-:•••••:-,•<-'e- -=;'••••••-":',•-:."'"?.*Lr'IM ' •••••• . ' •;,,,IT.1111:.5-fl :4,,,,:-: .••• •• •. •: *.•••-$.1...• '`.'••;:'..:.- '' ''''.*:•';'.,'•'.s....',' .7-S'',-,...'•••‘nii?,4-.4rol.4.1ar.'d•-for •,.t..-:.....o's'•.••,4(4;."";7.':::“^".'!''‘...n!';:', ' - .•- '''IEV?!.;.,;%;17.fi.;4.if.....:*:.*:'; ,‘; ;A ''' ri:n-.: ',.•::;,'.....,. :**7:-.''%.":* ':.,"..,..:,••,',..:;,..1...,...1.Cr.".;•jea.'ShiTlit,dil1/2.44..i.'')V'.* ".".',.'"Si'l.' .-.7.'!'...6.''fa'':.''',i f't',..,7..r.,':.^.:i:: . •'•., .. .-7,4,F,,,c.• • :.,,,•!:.• •' • - 'I.PUDLit, :„.1.._.........,:..,...........:........,_...„..,,;;;.:..........,.;,.,,....;—:,..,...4—t-..?i,..,....:4-.-...:ii ,,..:, ..';;..„..,;...,-::,.....;....,•:..,........iLt4.;z--4 .. -.- . .. - . ,, -1---ri -.1:-.:.1..,.,... • , : ..... ........„ . ..._ 0,,,..„.. .: ..: ....:. ........,..„-........„,............:„.....„-::..Vi.,:,:' •-:-.:fv!._,.cv.,•.,4.:12.4,74;.7**.::•:X,i,47,i-,.--,!•"••••••%•••-••••,7.:74......r ..;;K•:.7,-...?.,:::;•••.„•••:7;:,-„,‘T,,,.,,,;,;"•P=. . i ••• ••• • ,-f,,,..- Zo. 1.-"ci$•..•--.:"... ' •••'''.••'''''.. 6'.".'.:•;:i,........:•!•?;';:c..:Y-• ..1•144'.4.1atqfr:•57'.70/. 1•••: C,- ;::?:•F',i7g3.i'..;,..!:••,17,:•'.•:.',•;.",:.Cr' • . 1 , ip..,,-..?..•;,?,...K:,-;••2-:,..... • i. •i.,••,•','.:•• ' ' •• '' +'$:','':-:•...:-;...:•:.. .,:•:.:.....:.:, .•"L,:•i'•::•;:,..:K.',!:lx,'.1.'::41'.,..,:•::•;•?.-,.-.7. 6.,,,........, --.-"'.•-•.:24:F....7.,,: :.;•:,‘; ; ' vr-4h4•-t-,f,'!Fi.2....'......'i-,;7... . .. , . ..•.,, oF vi,jot%_„,..:.:.,-.•.•1...:. ........;::•,...>,,.;•-7... ..•-..,•1•!..;:•'•.'..?:,.7;!•-•;'.'(,•:!-:!;..::‘,4,?7'1,21 `-`4:0;71: t•I'`•'.•••:'....,.;;Y••..I.,...,•;••!.'-2-',';:-(V,:•:i''''''''':':7'.!(-i.• . 4.';:r•i-1::::...,'i•J' .. • ; :.. . • p..,''':'' ''''•"7:-,.....'•..''''.••••• ., ' •:a •",'',.".'':........•.'•-•''.'.''':'•''' ... ..::'..':%:',:'•'="-:•::74',';,.11.:C1V,!..-.C.11?e..,' ''...r.;'7;•''',,';:,-•!'tis:;',..;::::$'",••;!".,%': - ! 1.'.••,. • .:: - :......;..','„ ;,,...i.'.,'.....:'........-',.....,.....-,:'.'".......... .;,:.',,........ ,...;7*.i.r.l'i a•'-q,(....•;•,...,•''''...-C 43 f.....1c..11.ir,.:,, ,.1.......44."T;',,,,......-•",',..'.^,.,...'.....;•...'-2.i.i'v.S':,,P, . . . ,,c.Fry.•'/F,•••%:1•••!:'7 i....: . • '- ' •"' ' '•••" -.'.' ,••••••••'t••• .•. ..'. •••••':.','''':',•,..''''..v.1,-:::ii•,i;f'•••'":•••i+4•''••••'"V''..,.-''''-i•-•;••••'•-•••"••••1.=.'"•••••••-•;I:••••;',•'.....•.,it....,11..--:.:04,A; . ...,,'1::`,4•:..,..!,?:•:F..',.1.:::."' • .• • . •• .‘. ....",•....;:;;_.....::::.i;`,.....1'',..... . .*'•! ,".,:....••::',.r''nli!..4.4.';'.=....1.27.:,.tig!,-Iy5.1•:..77A,*'• :..r..1,,i'f.f2a4Vr.?.y.'.....,.'i.••,..;'',...1.,:.,...,. ..,,,a,.:7;;;;;;07,.,.;:i..f.,..s,..r.:i0,1?t,,,..;,.,- • . . \• - ...:?•••••'',...•:••••:{••••:-..,i-.s:-.!.•,....:•••••••::,:,••••••.?:,••••••.-:"..::',';F.i..-.•:;;;••••••:.:i..;.,!•:......,•f.V.,i.li•:‘..,•=',•r....1.,';‘'.:"•*,..'lq•O'i':5•7;74•••:fii i4-4i••••;.•:•-,-,•-.,-,-;',.,..,4•il-4:,..;.h..:Z:fj•;,:.:,-,•:.; ' , . ^ ....)• .• .• -.,'••:•••.",..1.:::::.:‘,••::,?•:::,•.••*r,:--:•••,;:•;r:-. .4•:•:',....',. :.-"••r.-,;'"•-•:.::",;.,•-•.!.•. ..:••:',,.;,'•,,,;-:N.:,•!!',i2...,....!••:,t"'zs',...1.L...,•:•:24,4 •L'..:"..."'''t•,2';'-..:.,,:.:ty'.,, ,. ..st... . ...!...40.0-.,....,gp. • , • . 1.• ..0;g.1:74.•••';;;.:7,7%.' .... ......,..„.?....................., .„,,..,.......„:„.:,...,.,..-..:.,,,,,......,..,......,.,...T,,.,,,...i.-..,,i:.••i. ,,,;.,1...,...,.. ....:•,i,.±...1:44A:,,,I.,r4Q.11x4A.,•,:.-17.,..;:•;,:::••.!e.',i,':•':••••:•11;:•17••••c,••'`':•••Ff:.ti;::77.1;•,4•• • ••• - : .1'.?4-274.•:•e •t•-'•,:.i.r-•••. . •:. [..;:.r••:' :'••.....;...t,•.:.....:r'f,.*:+'•.;.:'.,,4;:•;:'••••..... :,...•.;••;.•::::.,•4,:.71;.;.,::.:,:••,,•••••;1,1 . ;; q4,,),/t.-54,:,•:ri71-45.7;9- -f:14•,•,`,7•:••,:''.,-'";,1•"• ••,!--r•-•• ••••v!tl.''':•-4'',.'''a• ' :'•,'...i.. ?:-..- ...i .•_•:.-:.:::;,.),...,-''''-.1,'."•.,r,,....,..;.,..F:..!,...;..,t,.....73:,/,•TP!':',11.,"(1''`izs:4-4,!.:,o1•A:,-...:i..,?....5,,,:,i.,„y.1,....,;..v-4-.:.,...-i...,+--,I;i:..:1:4 . • - .. ....,v ilt-7,,742,:',;7!"1',.w...JE-. :;:/::••.'''.';'..';.:.:'•::':•:: ..':::..::::..'''J.::•":'.. .f':::17. ..4..'•,::).'.•'.;;.`'..;:..11. .Sne'd'i 7'''..':c.,L,-.;'.j.2".'";ii ,I-t"ri:fipFX?...11,f.2':isi.Itt. ;:::-.:it, .•.•••• .;•.-,••...::.,!1::•,,,;p..,4',7..•••,;,r;•,;.,'r.7';.... • . mt.r.1.:17:4',...•_•,.....•••,,7;,.'•••••:•••...• ' •. 4,',. ,',-,p..•...F..;•.•:....:.....!,..:::,...1..; :. e.i. '74'i'•:•: .... i4,;:::•?,,z1;. i.2":1a4•4./-•.= ,;..'-.7.,f.,1.••,.-..., ,:.;;;:•47.0,1,:. `..A.4,144.,•Zi'r.... :•: .•;.;,;.:':•?::•j2.,..4....V.:,-;•..:7'. .. .-:::1:.‘1•;1,;•.:'?;'il• 4. ^-"' ., • "74; ite<7'"‘:«i-Y-7.1-f., ....' _,L•r tee 2 seat cf1,1 -,:'..,..••too)!.;;-4 tx;-i;' "./11(. .41".s,e4;' s.-..4...i.47 " - 44,,k,...,...,-,..;,f'',' .1.;?'',-.:• . t':5%.:',*11!,1§.„7",) .,- - . . • 7.1..„ it4i4,0..a,__•,.,.• .,,.:-2„.....i....1•;:,......„..;,.,....„,4, ::. . „.7,•::1,. ....,:z.„147,-4 ,•,,,,•?:•••',WP••.?...'iji.r..' ',A-,..7.)",••,-,•:::•:.:••`.,:i,F;:•-•*•".!itq4.•,..k,...-,1•;4-4•.:.4`,.i.'1:.N, : . •...••••• . • . 1 ,jAiiir.S•ri..V.Z7;•,• ,,..........1,1.,7.2i_ ,.. ...,„. _, ,g. an,ei Mghwayf,:ar.i4;p.4%./.144.2.rx::::,•1*:....,..„:.1.4:_lii;•kt.'df.•:..2;1:1:k.',!Ze: r...,f:r...T.:,:4gli..41F.,..,••,07t5fZ!•,•,.;•..r L..,',.,.=. ':1f,••:.:.!.;e.i.' •:;c:\!;•at'l.P.!.017A {1-•,447.4 - ;'.' - • .'' •tr'''',&..3.•.,.,•-•":.L;.'kt,.t..';'••.,..J.• ., •:.....i-';' ,/....:.'....:1::F1.;•';.P.:'::40sta,?...1.141tRit,"Cd:wity i.i..0.,....P,..',Pirie:re.'15.&n.?.:',Fat,..,cii.1.,7, 74:if..:F,;•).ii.";•2;•-••,'',•:•:..Ftineolat:55'rp:':-;:.r.E.'!At• '• .•• '•'''P' ''%"-1.•••''J'''-'"•' :::•,..•.i.J.••••••',...!..,.....,,,,r...::.7ii,,,.:T.,L.::•..41',"..:41.,i;'1.,•''-'—' 1,' '""...••,`,.-')iW,,,....-rr.. •.i.,:li i ''"''.)11.7.)'i,....%...-i!.-i......;,,,,,..........0:.. -,ai,..,.•...L....-4?... , . • . - "'"'`,..71.1.,,G.Itr-n;:it,,,e,a-i,....--,',...t.i.7..:',...,,,t.7.4a,'',,•,::,...,tc,,-.-T.,.....1';'';'-2,,,,[1...‘ra'..,,S;.,:i.;;,1;.i,e7;.Y.,:.:.•:.7...7;,.::-.14..:17:•-:_;ipx13..:,..T.::,........" -•.• ,•••.1..'::•••I'''''.j.V.''''"'";'''•::•1.'5r,:.;•:e.:'.4'.:•;r:''''.:!"';':'::'..'":•:t":1.•:-'4•41.-;••:•::.;.•:`4,,'•••:•,:klei..:`.:1::-.Y.1,,..;.:rt.,.-,- ,,...;;,',7_r,:trkr.-4,1e4,,..,.,4:§ .,,.6.,,,„„,,.,„t,i.,.,..,...,,,,''''r.,., ,,.,,,......,,,,..,,,,,..,.,....p...,,,.. ,, . ... ...._ , .,..4„,,,:,_,_1;.„Ar•-.....i...ii;: 1•'•-: ••• :.-:.',••"'''''."•••:•••••.• ...'•.:••••••••-••F:e.'1,•'..7•:•',..i'.'::',1_,...1•.: '-',',.•:',;,ie.4,I,N:'.;'.1.•••'.-.:•f::.:417fttih..te:'.?.i..!g.....‘0.";-....IX!•;.Sitift'gf,•_:;41;;In'i7;...,..5.'..•••_•••:_: :.•::.:.••••`..::-.7ft.'_s•Gt5.*:;;; ;;71•1'.7•?• •if .1. . .•• • -- i...!ir?.!.cn- :;5‘•!.;-'it•i''.'•:.,•.'.•• . . ...• . .. ........ .. ...... ow ...... .. ... r.. T.I..•• ... 10-13-99; 1 .:36PM;EXAMS BY THE LB. FIRST AM. EXAM ;206 296 0911 # 4/ 9 • . ' • , '• . . , . \. p , • . . . • • , :1,:t7:------. . • 41 24COUNreL Ejr / 1 ••• n •in 0 • 1 E . .. • 4 . - .• .. .. 1164 .yi 4-511ING f'ON. . • ' :.- JAN 25 1974 . . . •:.'. '. 1:4. . .. •I., Vi. E3,, s -1-z.. r_ ;. , .... .,,. . kr/mm.0 8:,ua 4-- c• N ., 1., az.lifIciva'."'" • • wREN A-091AX= OS nand asamea Rua. I • !';• ,.: .:, . • • ....-.. .!•f'' •'''::''''': "7.,':,' ' li. Tms.sumica,cou4T OF THE STATE,OLWASEINUTON,-- • .-:, ;4:-;-::4,.';', Ii., , /1 li11'' il-LIL'._3 L.i,-6 L3 ..II.1 . .•, . . ,l-,,,r-,‘.f. • " .....,,.:!..-e.;:ri• ..-;.,-*.-,.:; ;1, ..-•: .:. . IN AND FOR KrqG COUNTY -,7:,•, -c.:., :.,.2 ...- . . ' • _ _ • •--- • STATE OP WASHINGTON, ) • :- - ..,... . ••• •„••,;;3•,' -•r NO. 761065 •:::- lit • 4',:;. Petitioner, .., -, • . "oir5-• • pp: ) JURY JUDGMENT AND DECREE - . . • pUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGET ) OF APPROPRIATION i ,.., COMPANY, a Washington corporation, ) t 1.4 , 6 . . :1' (farierly Puget Sound Traction • ) '',' •- ..0 ::3 Light & Power Campsny4 et. al., . ) ' 1g 7. ' - • 3 . ' - ' • . . i•:•..; ,:••• . • , ,...„ he ....„. . .. ,.. ....:. ... Respondents. ' A ; . ,% Thms natter coming on before the above entitled court, the State of i 1 4-. . i - :tn Washington appearing by Slade Gorton, Attorney General and John T. Hurley, 1 . '..'..,-.: Assistant Attorney General; respondent Puget Sound Power & Light Company, , .....• ..-". id..11.!%;11, : , — , •••• .• ‘• . ....• • ',:f4 "41tF 12. a• Washington corporation (formerly Puget Sound Traction Light &. Power •'''' '-r' ,,. . , . •.. Company)„ appearing by its attorneys, William S. Weaver and 1:546,14 G. Kari. .. . . CifhPerikins; Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams; respondent Old Colony Trust. ••.;•• ..7.;,.. .... :•.-11 i! ;1•.14,,. ...:.... .:.. . • • , .. 15 .--- 1— ". .COmpany,. a.Miiiachusetts corporation, Trustee, having beep .defaUlted for •.••• .... •:'4. .5...- ''.1'. .''..' • .. . . .....' ' ' allure to appear, and the jurY. on August 18, 1973, having found that •.:,..T- . :....,. 4.ti • • -4 ::::•••-*; : •.•-.-. • . . . . - ..'.7. % twenty-Eight Thousand and. no/lOO Dollars ($28,000) plus $200 statutory -A 'lleg ' : •;. . . . • • - -- - ,.1 ."--illialliation• allbwance, pursuant to ROW 8.25.020, is just compansatiOn ior V „ ' '':..7... II • . ..••• •• • • . the taking of the property and property rights as described in Ezhtbit NA", ... : ' •:... , . ,:f....19,. . ... • • , . . .0. . . • • being Item..Na 1.V Spagle, anid for any .damage caused by such gli4.0)34.1io :th.e. . • •..";:'.. ••;77., 1,;, ;4203: .., ,, ,. .. , .„ ....,:..,..,,, , ,.., i ..,. . . 'rimainder oi ,the piopirty, and a right of entry having been eiecatea 'on .....w ,..,,...i::::21 . ....., ,. .......Y.- ....i .e. . . • .......... ..., .. .. • :,... ..:,...r...-'.1.Deoembe r%2Ew'492, nOw therefore, ."--` 1111 VF-741-....:....,. . , . , ...... -.:,...;.. .2,2 . . ,. . .... -,-vel,!...::,;).... *-- ..111!a11 CADkRED, ADJUMED. AND .DECREED. That,pet - .umr. ihililpay .the- ....1.1! .)'... 4.. 4)..,:Tv,.......j..).... ,.: .71.eff" 4,, LAn'. 2,%,,.::,/.--r ' ..... .. . ....‘...:/, %....,"-t ':::' 3'1411%. IOW P 4.7t1 • • ...a. . .• •--7.••.• * • -i ..:.'...••••••:.'•';.•,•.',."i ,....!..i41;41 -'i:;• :'ft.,• •,V':'''.:'''':r4T''''''., -Fa:4ci% , ..'4'W..;', "i'0:1.?_'91 '..,,..,i.k.:,;:••,(,.•:. .,;!•-•::,;i"i.,'# ,p,'•;,.;.,.•..._.:,•,--,.-i':).-„.:,':'.::?F.-•••••:•••rr...:0,,,o..:;;,„‘.--, '....%4';,.;.• •"--- . , ..: ..• : ':1.. .';44:- :..: ' •*" . 1"%l; z 7.jpyr. r'..P•tr-: :•i'sp...0.'S.•4i,`_'''..0f--'4,-,;:t..'•;:,..‹... .''''1!.: ,:•••• .•-—:....w!.:.:... ...: "'- • • Atzli utr Gana ',I-61..1%..i..'..;11171itTer.;“.. 11;:fi..;;;. : . • ..:. .... -.. Ternpli al Alsace ...5.t a...C.r........thal loi-.11.1 ..., , . . , • , •!. „ P — sarazia_......4 wi. •:,..7.514:-.4.46 ' - t'.. . • • . S.T.1,harMS-4 -411r#, a114. . REEL MG nejfiraii,Int•9851" : :.,...,-... , '' * .fir' ' ' :."1: .:1:.:6.'" ,"'•:'''':. " i r;;;;;;;;;;;;;in ti • . • . . .....•• .. 1••r 1•.. Vv lv•--x a Alta ...aV -t I J• V I Y I L13.1111.111V Il y..J. • .ILI/a11.1JL V•I.1 S. Y YJ V vv 10-13-99; 1 :36PM;EXAMS By THE LB. .. FIRST AM. EXA" ;206 296 0911 # _/ 9 1 ,K • . ' S i. 1 aum of Twenty--Eight Thousand Two Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($28,200), 't. 2 plus interest at the rate of 6% per annum from December 26, 1972, to the i. 3 date of payment of the warrant into the registry of the court, as just • - 4 .compensation and upon such payment s .11 become the owner of the property :•:-':=:i<; y'.^C Yi�� .; i n•;•., .. � • - ,p-. ;:. :s. . fir,'-.:.1 PaP��.^-• . . • .• 5 end property rights as described In Exhibit "A" attached to and made a part i 6 cf this judgment, F :I:- 7 IT 15 FURTHER ORDERED That the acquisition of the property rights , _ . " . 8 described shall not affect the ownership rights to existing electrical ` , 9 transmission and distribution lines and appurtenances within the area • 10 acquired whether overhead or underground,- that the respondent shall 11 have for itself, its Successors and assigns, the same rights (whatever ' -;,•'' 12 they may be), to construct, erect, alter, improve, renew, replace, repair, 13 operate and maintain all such transmission and distribution lines at no • 14 expense to petitioner, above and below the new SR 515 right of way as they 13 had to do so above and below the previous right of way; provided,_ that 16 such rights shall not be exercised in such a manner as to interfere .with the ;` 17 intended use of said realty for highway purposes by the state. `` ?=" 18 IL SS FURTHER ORDERED That respondent Puget shall have for itself, 19 its successors and assigns, all reasonable rights of access to and from 20 respondent's remaining property and SR 515; that, Without limitation of 21 the generality of the foregoing, the State of Washington shall provide 22 adequate curb outs and reconstruct the existing road approaches on the .:.: ':=';•. 23 Easterly side of said highway at or near highway engineer's stations 24 428+90 and 430+20; and that the state shall have the right to enter upon, ;';..1 25 respondent Puget's remaining property where necessary, for the purpose 28 of acnstructing much road approaches. ", •. '21 .,.1 .ry-,7uda. ... :k�' - ..i_ r:. >'L'.=i1�;=' ,. w' '•�:.: : ... a 1 +! 1.' r•.ki:Z.i ..J s''ht '\ •..i".'•'i:f. •,',, *'•• l•'•1:�i.;3..4;;:al.h.:� 1. n/;,'•�••4:.1•4— .n••'.:z):: :44A!1ra �; �� ,.,44•I:y_iLI y;��1 I' I ♦,, 7� '� '�• . . . -'•':,`t. i:....a• ..•uf•zr,-..wr�....,...• ,..... ...,:4---,:...'L•7,t., ��• ` L V6 • 1 j ti,1.y rr•. ..•i Sr.••..'`.,.1.1' ';:g '.JatM,:;1.•,..:1,1••.A.,:1:••YAw::::m*er�`••a.ki:vcisva'-a 3W 7{ '•IJ4Y�kiGi 7, V•. . . .ifY111•A�J i `n':�'.LI..�i.—. •w:yyr...MiWw �. l:l:�.«: - pyrp. w. ...• 10-13-99; 1 :36PM;EXAM5 6Y *iE L . FIRST AM. EXP.- . ;206 296 0911 m 6/ 9 •• i IT IS FURTHER ORDERED That the easement area, Parcel "C" described '.,.. .i.. I2 in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is being acquired by the state for • • j i 3 sle a purposes only, shall revert to respondent Puget, .t.c successors i 4 and assigns, when the necessity for slnpes ceases to exist; and that at a such time or times as all or any portion of the land within the easement .4' 'area, Parcel described in Exhibit "�A"' is elevated or excavated•'•by•'thef�•;.M• .11r.� ,; 7 state or respondent Puget, their successors and assigns, or otherwise, to j.;`•-; .e': g approximate the highway elevation, all rights of the state herein shall r :;-, e'ee g. cease and terminate as to any and all portions of the easement area, Parcel , 10 "0" described, in Exhibit "A", so affected. f. 11 IT IS FORTHER ORDERED That the property described in Exhibit "A" is ;.iN. .. Z2 part of a larger parcel of real property owned by respondent Puget; that.,. lg' said larger parcel n..y be subject to a tax lien of King County; that flee ., '_:# Y. ' 14 assessed 9*aluQtion of the portion of said larger parcel not acquired by is the state exceeds the amount of all delinquent taxes and taxes payable 1e on all of said larger parcel; that, in accordance with the election of 17 respondent Puget, pursuant to RCW 84.60.070, the lien for any and all •,1g tars owing and payable on said larger parcel shall be set over to the ', "' .. 19 portion of said larger parcel not acquired by the state; and that, there- 20 , fore, the entire sum to be deposited pursuant to this order shall be paid ' ,- 21 to respondent Puget - • t" u 1..• 22 IT IS FORMER ORDERED That the clerk is to satisfy said judgment. ••:•:` 23 DONE IN OPEN COURT this =-T- day of - , 1974- :r.`evele. 24 • �" ` ::�_�..._ 25 6rra A;i;.:= , . 26 ro ,,s,,;+;;,,,a-• Jury Cudg. t.e4 • �. i .. r.V . •' ..• • ,r.• .., ' !T..,•a,:I ,'ra ' • .���1� � ~•.f ••f•,,- .. :.:,,.::•..;: r:•• • ,• i• .., ' •liiii. . • • fir . ,i...., l ,• „Li ...7v _ •., - 41 Z: 2t rKi ^r': 'T. �... �... .... �.•.�.. .•ua ...... ..�. ... ... a.au.,.ai.•a 0,6101 • ..u.aa a..•. .....11.1 u i v..• 10-13-99; 1 :36PM;EXAMS BY THE LB. FIRST AM. EXA". ;206 296 0911 # 7/ 9 • • . , . t.,,,,,,z, ! i' • • • Approved as to formorm and Notice ;','. ;+^ • • of Pr entat�nn waived: :;r` 1 Presented by: 2 SHADS (3ORTON „A ;J:, -,.. Attor• ener=l �}a„�,�/ >:,,,:., 2 f / or PuHSnNa, CO • $�i't}RS, otisex & ~•"% • t __ W/ W'ELLIASS;.'.Att arney a •'sacr'jPe■wapondyezat �•'•�^ '1:o •.i�•gt.,4 , •ll'iT•'� ei,'! '�4:-; ,•1• 'r • "Puget,301.4lci. ow,ee�.&,�iN,�1.•�}�t ril,c }�pax' Y 1 •• .'r.'',7=y•. st' t Attoy eft General .. ..,.ti: .: torrseys for 'etitioner • ` � 6 / f.47:etg: iy.. • S Yi'*,py Zl. •C... t.. r ... . pA • �• . • �: 4 ;-� � J• %'liA 1r:iry•''.` :-.Lid.'.: 3'\l?1 • biz=i'' , ''`.' 1;•;z- • •y,I1Ft��L ._ ) r • 03 4• Iit •• L '_J:• 1 .. "'��`' :vy : c' - : ' W' Itt 'y ri`•i •:':. •y'i;:••' •%%I'•••' a 0•••.e..fs1.•••ir.i 4•'' A" 't 1• :i'1.^j••3 1,•.WO' i';.r••,•:•••• • .:1 : •,r.. 'Su••• '•.".. •.1 . 5� A••• ••.• r1t'nLtt,l'7it"+1,1�4'4r • t �(ry./,f• .•. '• t.�'L• :'f'j7-t�. .. .. - '� + •�' ��'t�'1.' wl •r.v.r.r4•' -1q• w�•�•���® ``•• �/�MAMA �r� 'f•' '' '•�'C:i+.,•.y•jam_ • .c.. ].r re xf.1A� ,�..•• •, •• .,.• ' Tfir. r. ram—.. rw'\—...J.:•4•..A 1t4.1, .• rr.r.",o-wI.wMkas'+WY13AI,�WNNii .. ....... .... . .. . .. 1^i�. • I.f tlr" " 1• +••• +v• vv yv..... a.aai rvv ari VIA." Lra1l1L1a.•�a Iry✓1 • VL.ai i.•••• V1.11 v 4•�VVV ry, 10-13-99; 1 :36PM;EXAMS 8Y -'HE L8. FIRST AM. EXA"• ;206 296 0911 # 8/ 9 • ; • . . :. - i-- Sra:z L r -, r•A,t SINGLE i PARCELS 1-898,, 758 & 10189 IINTERESTED PARTIES; PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington Corporation; 'OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY. gr- DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" sr All that part of the follo,ing described Tract "X" lying easterly of a line. described as` " ' follows PH:...i. :: • Begin on the easterly boundary of Said Tract "X" at a point 50 feet distant westerly, when r measured radially from the Center Line Survey of SR 515, Renton Vicinity: Carr Road to Grady .Way at Highway Engineer's Station (to be hereinafter ' 427;63.2; thence northerly, referred to as "Station") . 432+96.23; thence westerly along arc hofsaad curve Centetor L the�left to ahaving aoint pradius ofa55ofeet. to an :intersection with thE. northerly boundary of said Tract "X" at a point opposite Station I 19+-29.;56 on the Grady Way Line Survey of said SR 515; thence northwesterly 50 feet to said I Station 19+29,55, and the end of this line description. I TRACT "X" All that portion of Block 2, Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats j. Washington, and of vacated Dora Street adjoining aBlockge *2,n and nall g othat �portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter and of the north 250 feet of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M,, in King County, Washington, lying south of the south margin of Grady Way (Secondary State Highway No. 1-t-), and west of•the west margin,of Talbot Road (Burnett Street Extension); • • EXCEPT the south 6D feet thereof as conveyed to the City of Renton by Deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5475310, and EXCEPT the west 402.42 feet fy thereof. xi . PARCEL. "B All that part of the following described Tract "Y" lying westerlyof a 1=T -- follows. line described as f r Begin at a point 50 feet distant easterly, ' '. .'R'ine at Station 420+00; thence northerly, when measured at right angles from said Center P . ;•.-' Station 433+15.9g; thence easterly alontherar�ceof at With to the mightLine, to a havingoanradius5ite 'af;.AS feet to an intersection with the northerly boundary of said Tract "Y" at a point :..••opposite Station 17+34.41 on said Grady Way Line Survey; thence northwesterly to said Station .-174-34.4t1, and the end of this line description. TOGETHER WITH the perpetual right, permit, license and easement to use and occupy the following described lands to be. designated as Parcel "C", for the purpose of constructing and maintaining highway slopes in excavation and/or embankment. n , +�� -t.If. •r- ' • ,ail 5• i r ... . .. -. • . . i:i•..•• :•.•..`. :�ti.,.,•. .t.'• i:'"'1•�1'. :.. .• - 'i•'".•• -•r" r•J:•.',: ,•;. •.,.•:• .Fyn }ri,4 4��.,'I i.. r +.:1j''•, ::: tt :�;:_..:.; .. "r„ .. .• ... . . .: • . •r.y :.•7-va....r. I••t•••. •1��tS�•i�•t•: r l••••'r�A'ti Ni'.Tlkic. �•. r_�L516 ! ti, _ GW�L- ty�.r.•Lu•r.. • • t•I r 10-i3-9e; 1 !36PM;EXAMS BY. ''E LB. FIRST AM. EXA' ;206 296 0911 # 9/ 9 • f"1 i. .7 ' ' I Parcels 1-8984, 10158, 10159 '(Continued) • PARCEL "C" All that part of said Tract "Y" lying within a strip of land having a width of 10 feet lying t • easterly of, adjacent to and contiguous with the easterly boundary of the above described Parcel °8" and extending from a point opposite Station 424+00 northerly_ to a point opposite Station 427+00. • • TRACT "Y'' . • All that portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter and ' 1 of 'the north 250 feet of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, lying south of 8th Avenue, South and East of Burnett Extension, as conveyed to the State of Washington by instrument recorded under Auditor File No. 5754046, and north of the north line of Primary State Hhhway,No. 1, as conveyed by said Deed. - ALS That portion of Block 2, Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, according to plat recorded in Volume 6 of plats, page 23, in King County, Washington, •'' ' lying southeasterly of Grady Way and northeasterly of Burnett Extension . (also known as Tzlbot Road), which was conveyed to the State of Washington . by instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 5754046- 1;; The lands being herein condemned for perpetual easement (Parcel "C") contain an.area of 0.07.acre, more or less. a ;.:°: The lands being herein condemned in fee contain an area of 0.4154 acre, more or less, the ' ,:'' specific details concerning all of which may be found within that certain map of definite • location now of record and on file in the Office of the Director of Highways at Olympia, ,• . Washington, bearing date of approval November 5, 1971, revised December 8, 1972; and the.. " ' 'Centerline Of'which is also of record in Volume 5 of Highway Plats, page 96, records of..,] King:County, State of Washington. . ,• 1,.. - 5 Renton Vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way 12-8-72 •• ., i- U l .a -. - .i ......J___1 l�✓ `, - • .• :A• ...... . . ' � •� n� ry4i'iN•J.'•:. .,:,14.7. Z.,%: �f.�l i.,'LL''+ '4(?,•,....A-. ~•', }{,: ..— ;1'�':i.. +.{!:. , °iu.. .•�'.': �':C' .✓ .1:%L.fl'� ';�P"`. •.¢itr, 4;,'.:•.' :'1{!� q• .9 '( ' 1", ' .. ''•;' �! ".r!.• 1,t;;�l :t'•. ..•.�C�., t%••+• .. .. �•r•}e��•'1•' •• .. .� •;","i • }.` � Lt. . .w,�-,- -y wa............_...�. ._.._.. ...�...r,...__... .... .,... _. _, . • • -' C B A S Z W Z T • r O . • t THIS INDENTURE, made this 21st day of April , 19,_, between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, ..nd PUGET PROPERTIES, INC, Washington Corporations, herein called GRANTORS, • • and CITY OF RENTON, herein called GRANTEE, • WITNESSETH: • That it ^onsideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR DOLLARS ($ 1.00 ) in hand paid, receipt of „ • which is hereby acknowledged, and the performance by Grantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, Grantors for their joint and • 1 separate interests hereby grant unto Grantee, without warranty cf e, any kind, a right of way not exceeding 5 feet in width on each ' r, . ) side of the center line hereinafter described, for the construction, • • . ince and opex,...ion of the following described service facility: SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINE • within and across and following described land situated in the • County of King. State of Washington, to wit: :i:• . The west one half of Section 20 and the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5, • • Bast, W.M. r - • The center line of said facility shall be located as follows: ' ' ^�' Beginning at the center of said Section 20, thence , - South O1°46'02" West along the north-south center •::,'j line of said t:^.tion 20, a distance of 953.37 feet to a point on the center line of 12th Place South; • • thence South 89°10'20• West along said center line, =/ a distance of 653.78 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 12°03'09" Mesta distance ' ' of 7.11 feet; thence North 27°03'19" Bast a dis- tan• ce of 205.09 feet; thence North 62°02'51" West 7• ' V • . ... • .. tee.... ..• a • ' C• .. } ;YOI 1707 , 194 a distance of 107.09 feet; thence N. 31°38'06" West a distance of 145.12 feet; thence N 48° .•. 46'21" West a .distance of 191.99 feet; thence N 01°55'45" West a distance of 65.28 feet; thence N 34°13'37" West a distance of 143.34 feet; thence North 26°52'14" West a distance of 179.19 feet; thence North 02°20'59" West a distance of 98.61 feet; thence North 39°36'03" West a distance of 136.87 feet; thence North 00°57'52" West a distance of 104.01 feet; thence North 41°26'37" West a distance of 129.01 feet; thence North 16°38'29" West a distance of 192.35 feet; thence North 08°34'46" East a distance of 105.15 feet; thence North 27°05'14" West a distance of 189.17 feet; thence North 31°08'07" West a distance of 239.61 feet; thence North 21°26'59" West a distance of 272.51 feet; thence North 18°40'44" West a distance of 106.24 feet; thence North 32°12'52" West a distance of 51.66 feet; thence North 16°58'37i West a distance of 144.26 feet; thence North 35°10'45" West a distance of 107.28 feet; thence North 22'14'15" West a distance of 424.28 feet; thence North 44°57'15" West a distance of 112.14 f:et; thence North 51°08'26" West a distance of 166.38 feet; thence South 46°43'34" West a dis- tr--ce of 248.09 Peet; thence South 17°04'56" W -t a distance of 142.50 feet; thence North • 89 37'41" West a distance of 409.44 feet; thence • South 02°09'57" West a distance of 763.70 feet; thence North 89°43'30" West a distance of 18.00 feet to a point on the center line of the Talbot Road, said point being the terminus of this easement and lying North 09°59'59" West a dis- tance of. 1,125.91 feet from the East one c, arter corner of said Section 19. Except Roads This easement is granted on the following terms and con- ditions: 1. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantors harmless from all loss or damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the right herein granted and from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made ..ad to indemnify Grantors for all such loss, damage and claims. 2. Grantors reserve the right to use said land for their own purposes in any way, and to grant rights in said land • • to others, not inconsistent with the right herein granted to wGrantee, and Grantee hereby assumes all risk of loss or damage, 7, including da.aage or injury to persona or to property, which G; Lr' may be suffered by Grantee resulting from Grantors' use of said land and any of its equipment thereon, whether said damage or injury be due to the negligence of Grantors, their servants or agents, or otherwise. 3. The right hereby granted shall cease and determine whenever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the use of said facility and upon such abandonment Grantee shall remove its facility and restore the premises to as good a condition as they were in prior to the construction of said facility. 4. If the Grantee, its successors or assigns makes an excavation in she Grantors' property, it shall without delay restore the surface as nearly as practicable to the same con- dition as it was in before the doing of such work. 5. The location of said right of way is shown on map dated March 19, 1965, prepared by M. C. MacLearnsberry, copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above • writ •,3 �{Il': PUGET SO PC:WER & LIGHT COMPANY '�+!. 9f.111 �, � /• TSoe Prea nt GRANTOR 44etary - z ,1 1G'.r• I� ems•: .. .. . . • STATE OF WASHINGTON) . ) as. . •- COUNTY OF KING •) • On this 27st •day of April , 19 65 , before me personally appeared R. P. MK= and G. S. SCSCIGGL • •r r me known to be th- Wire Presddsnt and Searetarr , respectively, of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT.COMPANY, one of the corporations that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of enid corporation for the uses And purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and . that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my haFlsr. �` and affixed my official seal the day and year first ak�oue... . written. / � ic, Notary Pub37cTie! . and for the`.. JCate,:. ��'••, of Washington, riding at � 4S 4.; :Z .--- . PUGET PROPERTIES, INC. * t - ...,. • it 3 't£i!!!tA" By �•l f Av 'am President GRANTOR • Slcretary STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) 58. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 21rt day of mil , 1961 ,, before ma personally appeared F. W. T &La. and . C. E. WHOM= , to me known to be Sloe President and ssoeetasa , respectively; of PUGET PROPERTIES,INC., one of,'bb.' corporations that executed the within and fore- � • ). going instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be .,';�;, F the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for .i'i the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated :- ,:,. that they were authorized to execute said instrument and - [Ulf that the seals affixed are the corporate seals of said corporations. - . > , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand •;•_,r ; . and affixed my official seal the day and year first above `(..Y ': yr .�' '�```� \.;A4�pirh,e;\al Ls W,. 11.0 1 Notary Public for the State . i i...*11 ,c 'of Washington, res ing at Bsllevos ;, •.•4141ri 1?:' 4 ,� _ I ..... PI ILceL a c PFR Reference No. 19597 EASEMENT r, `r e , 1972, between -z THIS INDE(IURE made this i// day of /44-z• • PUGET SOUND POWER f, LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corpotr�htion, herein called "Grantor," and PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, herein 1.‘") called "Grantee," O WITNESSETH: That in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable • consideration, in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the per- formance by Grantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, Grantor hereby grant:: unto Grantee the following: :1 permanent easement for the installation, construction, operation • N1 ��,-,,n maintenance, inspection, repair, replacement and removal of a man J." . vault together with commuticiations lines enclosed within a caner e uy R �,'..4. .` . conduit system under, over, along and across the following dose 1,y ;.3 property: 1 f 1 . .1 parcel of land located in the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 o 'rh- /'a -... 4:7i :;ortheast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. : • •. King County, Washington, described as follows: \ '— / . :-,% ,e Commencing at the point of intersection of the southerly boundary of '• 8th Avenue as shown on the plat of Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, records of King County, Washington, and the existing easterly boundary of Talbot Road, said point being apprnx- • imately opposite Station 430+19 of SR 515 as proposed and shown on State .Highway Map SR 515, M.P. 5.15 to M.P. 7.22, Renton Vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way, Right of Way Plan,. Sheet 6 of 11 sheets, as approved November 6. 5, 1971; thence southerly along the existing easterly boundary of Talbot Road a distance of 10 feet to the true point of beginning; thence contin- uing southerly along said easterly boundary a distance of 60 Ecet; thence easterly at right angles to said easterly boundary a distance of 10 feet; thence northerly parallel to said easterly boundary a distance of 60 feet; thence westerly 10 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. . 'Ilse rights herein granted arc subject to the following terms and conditions: • 1. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantor harmless from all loss or damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the rights herein granted and from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made and to indemnify Grantor for all such loss, damage and claims. 2. Grantor shall not be liable for.any loss or damages to Grantee's facilities resulting.from Grantor's use of the lands encumbered by this easement ', + unless such loss or damage is due to a r •sgligent act or omission of Grantor. -- / 3. Grantor reserves the right to develop and use the lands encumbered = by this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights granted herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor reserves the right , ,`7 at any time and from time to time to construct or reconstruct electric lines e\`' (whether AC or DC; whether now existing or hereafter to be constructed) on lands . adjacent to this easement in such manner that wires and other related structures /i - May overhang or project into the air over, along and across the lands encumbered rr7` , by this easement. • ��`��`,__ R.1.1- . R 1 . • 4. Grantor reserves the right to grant access rights to others along or^ (:1 across the lands encumbered by this easement and/or any other right which i.s r • not inconsistent with the rights herein granted to Grantee. a. - 9„tea .�V `.�f% i.`r s r Sha., _„..:_ . i ,,I 'Gl= lr+ U'" ^' G .. . . c TT"-. . .. . . . . , ,,....:,.. •,.:.• • . • 5. Grantee agrees to provide adequate drainage to prevent any backup • of surface water over Grantor's right of way or adjacent land which may result from Grantee's exercise of said easement. 6. Should the easement area be subsequently improved, Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole cost and expense, replace or restore to its original cr. condition any such improvements which are damaged or destroyed as the result of '? u Grantee's exercise of the rights herein. N -- 7. Grantee agrees that said communications lines and concrete conduit vshall be buried at least three (3) feet below the natural surface of the ground CV at all points, that the manhole shall be installed in such manner that no portion ^ of such manhole facility shall extend more than two (1) inches above the natural . surface.of the ground, and that excavated'areas shall be .restored to their orig- inal grade. Grantee .further agrees that'should the elevation of the ground surface be raised in connection with any future development of the easement area and adjacent property, Grantee shall, without unreasonable delay, install risers at. its own cost to maintain accessibility to such manhole facility, and such risers shall not project above the finished grade adjacent to such manhole facility. 8. Grantee agrees that should there be any material excavated from Grantor's property which is in excess of the amount required to restore the surface to its original grade, such excess material shall be removed. • 9. No assignment of the privileges and benefits accruing to the Grantee hereunder, by operation of law or otherwise, shall be valid without the prior written consent of the Grantor. . 10. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the • benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. 11. The rights hereby granted shall cease and determine whenever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the.use of its facilities accommodated by this easement. PUGET SOUND POWER & LICHT COMPANY • By d- -� . a er, teal .state Division STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. . COUNTY OF.KING ) • A On this // day of ...4 ,..1972, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared LESLIE A. EONINEW, to it known to be the Manager, Real Estate Division of PUGET SOUND POWER F, LIG•if COMPANY, the corporation that executed the . foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act .and deed of said.corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. - • Notary lc inaI /toor the State o fe, � eiing ,•, . residing t �Rce....-e_._ ;Lug � y••1µ'1 • • • • 2 - WATER LINE EASEMENT • THIS INDENTURE made this A 2 day of „,470,,Zic 1974, between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Grantor" herein) and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal corporation of King County, Washington, ("Grantee" herein) ; WITNE)SETH: . That in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknow- a7 ledged, and performance by Grantee of the covenants hereinafter set forth, `T Grantor herebygrants unto Grantee a CD Grantor perpetual easement over, across CT- and under +' 1 following described property, situated in King County, Washington: CD • That portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , including Block 2, Walsworth's 1st Addition to Renton, recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 23, records of said county, lying southerly of Grady Way. A. Permanent 5-foot Easement That portion of the above described property lying within 55 feet as measured at right angles southwesterly and westerly of and parallel with the following described centerline, as snown on Washington State Highway Department Right of Way Plan of SR 515 (Burnett Street Extension) MP 5.15 to MP 7. 22 Renton • vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way, Sheet 6 of 11 sheets. approved November 5, 1971: Beginning at the intersection (H.E.S. 433+99.93) of the centerlines of Grady Way and SF.. 515 (Burnett Street) ; thence S 32°51'49" E along said centerline 231.66 feet (H.E.S. 431+68 17) to' the P.C. of a curve to the right having a radi • of 700 n'' feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 35°32' 40" for a distance of 434.26 feet to the P.E. of said curve )H.E.S. 427+33.91) ; thence continuing along said centerline S 02'40'51" W 99.51 feet to the terminus of said centerline (H.E.S. 426+34.4) ; EXCEPT public roads. B. Temporary 25-foot Construction Easement • That portion of the above described property lying within 75 feet, as measured at right angles southwesterly and westerly of and paralle_ with the following described centerline: Beginning at the intersection (H.E.S. 433+99.83) of the center'ines of Grady Way and SR 515 (Burnett Street) , Right of Way Plan, SR 515 (Burnett Street Extension) MP 5.15 to MP 7.22 Renton vicin- ity: Carr Road to Grady .Lay, Sheet 6 of '1 sheets, approved November 5, 1971; thence S 32°51'49" E along said centerline 231.66 feet (H.E.S. 431+68.17) to the P.T. of a curve to the right having a radius of 700.00 feet: thence along said curve through a .central angle of 35°32'40" for a distance of 434.26 feet to the P.T. of said curve (H.E.S. 427+33.91) ; thence continuing along said centerline S 02°40'S1" W. 99.51 feet to the terminus of said centerline (H.E.S. 426+34.4) ; EXCEPT public roads. The temporary construction easement shall remain in force dur- ing construction and until such time as the water line has been accepted for maintenance and operation by the City of Renton., for the purpose of using the above described area during con- struction and installation of a water line with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto on the property hereinabovc • described in the permanent easement, but in no event later t'.an February 1, 1q75. Said easement being for the purpose of ing, constructing, operating, :maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a water line with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto, is.granted on the following terms and conditions: • i. A r 1 • 1. The facilities shall consist of a single line of pipe not over 24 inches inside diameter and all connections, manholes and appurten- ances thereto, said line of pipe to be buried at least three feet below the natural surface of the ground at all points. Grantee agrees to install and maintain substantial permanent markers at both ends of said facility on the right of way hereby granted sufficient to give notice to all persons of the location of Grantee's buried facilities. 2. Grantee agrees to save and hold Grantor harmless from all loss or damage which may be due to the exercise by Grantee of the rights herein granted, and from all claims for such damage by whomsoever made and to . indemnify Grantor for all such loss, damage and claims. 3. Grantor shall not be liable for any loss or damages to Grantee's facilities resl.u;.ing from Grantor's use of the lands encumbered by this cp cp easement unless such loss or damage is due to negligent•act or omission ?` of Grantor. Grantor agrees to use reasonable care. N 4. Grantee shall reimburse the Grantor for any increases in taxes CDT or assessments of any kind levied against the above described land by r•. reason of the installation of the water line, the use thereof, or the easement herein granted. 5. Grantor reserves the right to develop and use the lands encum- bered by this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights granted herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor reserves the right at any time, and from time to time, to con- struct or reconstruct electric lines (whether AC or DC; whether now existing or hereafter to be constructed) on this easement in such manner that wires and other related structures may be under, over, along and across the lands encumbered by this easement. 6. Grantor reserves the right to grant access rights to others along or across the lands encumbered by this easement and to grant arc, other right which is not inconsistent with the rights he. :in gran u.i c , Grantee. 7. Grantee agrees to provide adequate drainage to prevent any backup of'surface water over the easement area or Grantor's adjacent land which may result from Grantee's exercise of said easement. 8. Should the easement area be subsequently improved, Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole cost and expense, replace or restore to its improved condition any such improvements which are damaged or destroyed as the result of Grantee's exercise of its rights of mainten- ance, repair or replacement. 9. Following the installation of said facilities, Grantee agrees to restore the easement area to the condition it was in prior to the exercise of the rights herein granted. 10. Grantee agrees that should there be any material excavated from Grantor's property which is in excess of the amount required to restore the surface to its original grade, such excess material shall be removed at Grantee's expense. 11. No assignment of the privileges and benefits accruing to the Grantee hereunder, by operation of law or otherwise, shall be valid without the prior written consent of Grantor. 12. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. - 2 - 13. The rights hereby granted shall cease and determine whenever Grantee shall have permanently abandoned the use of its facilities accommodated by this easement for a period of five years. PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY • HY , a ‘41- anag r-Real Estate Division O N STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. N. COUNTY OF KING On this ,,, day of ¢e,,,/ , 1974, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared LESLIE A. DONNER, to me known to be the Manager-Real Estate Division, of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation • that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instru- ment, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses• and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day an year first above written. Notary Public in and for t e Sta;t%ip,f;,,•. • Washington, residing at r •` .Y •k 1t�'` • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-98-164-LLA-N END-030-0177 A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE . NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,FLANGE 5 EAST,W.M. CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS P.M.a- DECLARATION _ lwl POTION Of COVCgxH(NI 101 10 N THE SOUIHn[5T 000ai(o Or SEC7ON 17, PARCEL DI: IRE uNDERSIGNE0 CORPOtAION DECLARES THAT IRIS LOT WE Muu51YEHT S ALADE f0.0.3. 2)YONIn,RANGE S UST.W Y.w KING[OuRTY.NASNwGIOH,aSCADID AS ALl THAI PORTON Cl loot PUGLI SOnH LMgy.NC.(f0RYLiR1 Poca 541D PONiq WIT a5 TREE NXL MO WNSLNI AHD 4 THE(HAWK 0PIC1ON Or ITS NSNES 10.D.uS1 R LCni COHPART)SNuf[LEIOR NO 1.Rl,2 1RA6105SOM UHL CORRIDOR IN THE THE PROPERTY LAMES AS SOON HEREON AND DECLARES 1n1 If 6 WE(IC SNARE O*NLR BMG/06 M II A POY11 woo.6..53 RE EAST 0,INC SOIIIIl1C11 CORNER Of NNE 1,061HSI51 DUANLR Of SECTOR 20.10* Or THE LANDS WONT.HEREON. 15ws 23 HORIN,RANGE 5[ASH,ru.,w INENCESOW/RAISE NORTH ISO Of ielE 50UINa{SI DUAR1Eq Of SVD SECION 17; WIG COIIIHl,WASITYIGIOI,lYt6 NESRfRF f((B(NSON POD 50u1H WWI NISIN 150 FIR. PLOD WESTERN.IONC INC. THENCE NISI 513 UM A uA51N141ON COAPOMlIOn • ,f THENCE NORTH 11 THE O M[RO LITALROAD a THE SO WATT WAY: PARCEL 0). -THENCE EAST 10INE .LOft SRO 90W 10 THE SOWN lM O SAO SOIDIMSI WARM. THENCE[ASH 10 THE POIr a[EGYIRNG. • P P _• • . PARCEL R THAT PORTION Of G02PMY(M lots 1 AND 2.SEnHN 30,IONNY.P 73 HORiR, f�•R O • MANGE 5 LAST,HIE N CMG C0000TT,WAS49NCION.LING*AMOR AND NORIHEOLT A R 1019 1-1 1.1 PORTION Or THE NORTHEAST OWR1CR Of THE NORTHEAST*ARM OF STCION Cl PRRYRI STATE NCH.,ID i,AS[OwEYLD 10 THE STOIC O WASYNGION DE P9CSLfN 19.TOMOTNERLI P 13 NORTH,SOUTH RANGE I 5 E/r1,W.NO N RS COMM.ITION TO LEND DEEDS 0[COROTA UNOCR RECOOON1.NOS 3327,)0 AND.97.770. •SOUIHEq.I Of OR SOUTH LINE Of 1YALST04l1US FIRST ADDITION TD RENYON„ ACCOR000 10 THE PUT MEMO,RECORDED O MAMA{or PLATS,PACE 73.RECORDS LRCEPI PORTIONS THEREOF l0wC 111HH BENSON ROAD SOWN; O Iwo COMITY.1Y5NOGIGN,AID EASTERLY Of MC EASTERLY UNE OF TALBOT ROW '� SOWN AND(OC(PI AM PORTION THEREOF 101C(ASIERLI OF BENSON R01D BOTTLE • ti" ;PARCEL C AND INCEPT DENT MOTOR 7HERC0(LTwG WIIHPN THE PUCK SOLO ENERGY,INC. ,�.,F, AT 0OR1ON Of(A.IRRY EC CNI LOT 10.SURE 17,IO YNLOP 23 NDam.RANGE 5 (1ORYERI0 PU(C1 SOUND POWER ix S1u1TLEl0H ND.1 AND 1 . ACACKNOWLEDGMENTTH IASI.WY.IN Pw c0 G AME WASN0G10N.A110 Or COVERMYCN1 LOT I.SECTION 70. TRWSWSSNON LW CORRIDOR:E ,--. Toms.;7371LORM,RANGE 5 UST.RN..RERN0 COUNTY.WAS4041014 DC. ATRA , sun Of 1A TANCIOM ) 1 AS(O110RS AHD EXCEPT ANY PORDE*,METRO,LYING NORTHERLY Cl MC PLAY SORO ENERGY. (SS INC,(1o*1ERtl PUGR SWIG POWER A 1•C:Hr COUPAM)SNURLLION NO 1 AND 7 COUNTY Of MC ) - •` 0ECANNo 0 ON TARE NORM LINE Of SLID 106001 TEN!LOT 1 AT A PONT 520.00 I,,. 1RANSY65ON IN[CORRIDOR, SI51 Cf THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of SLID COVEO.WEM LOT 1: I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE lturr R ET BOTD t'�• THENCE NORM 5100 RR: AND EXCEPT AM PONIION THEREOF 11R6 SOU1NEQT 00 11t r0U01WG DESCRIBED NNE: IS THE PERSON WNO APPEARED BEFORE YE.AND 5{O PERSON PCKNOwLIDGED L"' THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH ENE Or SAm GOVER7WEM LOT TO A 7HA7 HE SIGNED MS WSTgUYEM,Or.OATH STATED 7HA1 HE WAS AUTHORIZED ID OSIIAC(O 77716 RR.YORE OR LASS.TO DE GSI WC OF A TARN Dr LAND MUD DEGINPAO6 SI51 UM a SAO SEngH 20 a 04TANC[OF lug MT SOUTH D/ EKECUTE THE INS3RUUENT AN0 ACKNOWLEDGED IT A5 THE PRESIDENT 10 0061 SObfO MACRON.LOTH USE PURR CONRAN.Err DEED RECORDED UNDER NOPRM51 CORNER THERM Or P11GET WCSTCRN,INC..10 SC THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT Or SUCH -� (NG COUNTY QCORONG NO.R17107,NIt01 t(E 6 PARALLEL sou NO N3.)0 PLR EAST MARY NORTH Or32'or,AST.2ii 91 ME YORE OR LESS.10 IRE SISTERLYf PARTY S�•....0 USES AND p1IRPOSES 11M0NE0 IN ME NS20UNENI. Or THE WEST THE Of 5ND SECTOR 17 AND 20, IINC OF COMET IDNO NO Bo DEMO THE MANNA a THE MUM)lAC CO �. i I‘ TRUCE SOWN ALOIO SLED VLSI LNE)LAN U MEMEYORE 0R TAR NORM WES,ID 11C N Df • J d-B.. • `11 A TRACI OF D 0E(0(0 10 MANOR COOPOUM N.CO COYP PARKA O AN0 Or ORO RECORDED ; • • NOTARY PUBLIC N UV FOR STAR Of WASHROOM, '' __ DECENBLR 26.1900,TRADER RAM COUNIT 0EC0ROI.G NO.200970E . THEW(VL51ERU1 ALONG SAO NORTH 11C ID TIC HEST LINE Or THE UST 520.00 0EE7 maw HALE kW'M. La.,IC AMIN 1...!;..a i Of SAC GOIRROOM O S I. A PARCEL 0 .0 .71[eiG[W IV WOOER 1 . CTIONIMRE 20PA T WSH9uLARLY 23 NORTH C- ' MINCE NORTH NOAY.SAID HEST ENE 200 F[R,YORE OR LESS TO THE POLAR O RANGES UST.■Y,N MR6 COUNTY,YALNWGTON,YORE PARIC1aARLY OCSC91BE0 ' -�1 BILOY.rNG; AS iOLEOK: nano 7L-�^?a jl ,I • • LOOPI PENNON WNWIYNL Nolo.um/AT11.V(sow.(ICNSON ROM SOWN)♦5 • aSCR0(0 N CUD RECORDED UNDER ICCORDNG NO.2027715. DEG9INNG ON DE NEE LYE of YO Roam20 A MINCE OF 1110 RR SOAR HE ~: I MC NORT1w(Sl CORNER THEREOF; irligillikliiiill - (�! PARCEL 01: THENCE SCUM NOW WO WEST Lot 45327 FIR.YORE 0R MS.10 ITC NC51ERLl e c_- 1 LIRE D<CONRT ROM N0 BD: APPROVALS 4 • 4 WI PORTION Or(DTE1MN(M LOTS 1 Alm 2,SECTION 20,TOtl151CP 75 NORTH.RANCE THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG WO WESTERLY LINE 505.95 IEEE ;'�T1� !EASE W Y:N ARC COUNTY,RASIrRG1OIf,LwL RESTER,' 10mHE LT O PPWM iNCHCO SOUNN or 37'a1'Y[S7,119 91 TER.NOR(OR LESS,TO THE PONE 00 EaAYYED AND APPROVED 1N6 Cite DA7 Or f'9rsiAlffx 199R ' tEI 51.1E f 111 40 0 11 0 I,AS MINDED(01HE Staff DE 0154 MGTON RI DE[Os RECORDED BLONAHwG: F ^`_�••--LL YIIX9 RLCORORG NOS.1777479 aN0.9N77q intOMM q �� �"ypI�- ([(i AN9 POifOM IHLREOf LING t111TR1 TIE fOLL0aY1G'DESCRIBED PARCEL• 1I55 COUNtt ROAD: (' 1 ,ypOar �//L1 i{ t Cm W AONMSTRArOR,Sots... WOOS . 1 . LIFT (All PsOcRa Of COYOIRNEM LOT 10.S(CION 1),TOMAHA'23 NORTH.RANGE 5 LESS STAIC WOM'AT. f i UST,Hu.LH RNG COUNTY.WAS.Cfe.ki0 OF GENERNYtM LOT T.WO SrCfION A 7D,a AS IOU4K: C 3 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS .,..B`EC.o.w ON INNS ROAM UM OrSYO COTERMH OR M LOT 1 AT A PO 571.00 FELT RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 1 I -01. .NEST a 114 NOI1HEA37 CORNER Or SAO GORERTANINT l01 1: MANNED NANO IPPICNill MS�/� MENU NORTH 5)00 MtIv DI,TILT Of D(C4M-1,•1(.IBM 41_d 1(EKI HST PARALLEL HIM THE SOUTH LNE et SYO CO4INY0N1 TOT 10,A MTAME • (N000CR5 CORRESPOND WITH FIRST AAERICAN SU0ONSION GUARANTEE) �' OF 737.1{RR,1100 LOSS. E Oa TO THE U l ST 0E 0f A TRACE Of LAND DEEDED TO 1 / 1 •1 PLAT SOUND 7R.CMN,Dud AND POWER COYPNH 6n DEED RECORD(p UNDER MNO 5 MS PROPERTY 6 SUBECI 10 11E TERNS AND CONDOMS Cl to./..as,CON410NS. 540 'b11`Y�A �]•' �,L'�1 I .^/1f��Y'� COUIITY RICOI C N0 ■1710).INCH IRE 6 PARALLEL THIN NM..S. Two LAST RESIRCICNS.R[SERV1RORS AND/OR ERUPTIONS[(Wawa W NS1Ruu4N7 AS RLCO>a0 PRPC COLMO ASSESSOR- L� a Kura I1Wn ASSESSOR 1.-1 MEET UST 0f TIE NST UN E Of SAO SECIONS 17 ARO 20. UNDER.RECORENG ITO 559503 AND$59301,RECORDS Cl RUNG COINTT.WASMR6ION•Tor' .HOC( H ALONG S.O VLSI llE 313 fat NMI OR LESS.TO THE N00111 UNE Of ALGOR�j1D W. S11+I113DS-cm L-4R9(L al 511 1E/44 v IRIC1 TARO DE(DEO 10 R(WO.COOPERATIVE COAL 600001N,.MYDEED RECORDED O INS MORE,4 SuEEC1 l0 DC 10 WA(MAW SLOPES MRCUTS NO ELLS IRR NUUB( + DUMBERI.1900.WADER MC COURT RICOROING NO 20093q r0R if.BENSON ROAD AS R[[OR0O UNDER R(COYDNC HO 2677)15.RICOROS a RNC i THENCE CARERLY ALONG SAID TOREN lM 10 THE WA LANE DE M(LAST 576.00 RR [PALATE WASNNGIO.. ^,* 1 SLID LO.ER.MM 101 1; II.THE HOKUM IS SMUT M M RHO oIDn10f6 a CONDEIAINION O ACCESS . THENCE woad NOC SYO WEST lN(7{0 PLR,YORE OR LESS.10 7K POW Of NO C eEOADMG. AND FROM 10 WALE HECEs5.m SLOPES f0R CuIS AMJ ILLS AS[CHARRED N SIPLROR IY I�'0- _ • • COURT CAUSE NO. 70T0{5. I N50(CEPT P0g110MS MI11E0f LYNG M01N BENSON ROM MUM AND SOUTH CRAWi . W.F; II MS PMKm 6 51O.0R l0 M TO14 Nm Commo4 OF A SOWN sh0R(AUWn '�� - AS RECORDED UNDER MORONS N0.59)IF3..Rams Cl LNG c6*003.WL5W61ON. C „•,w AND ETL(PI ANT IORIION DEOCOf lTX6(ASiIRL1 Cl BENSON HOLD SDURU II.1115 PR0P(m 4 51.YEn 10 11E 1La15 NO[00006 Cl A MOM IO 004051 OCTAL • 0 Oxus ANT PENNON THEREOF DING MORN IHC PUGET 500N0 PIERCE MC. TDEPNONI MAIM a5 RECORDED Ufa{R[CDgD96 IN 7}OSIJ0197.RECORDS of ��� ( MO SOAR POUTER A lA'JQ KD1,PAl(1/SNRRilE7AN 1O 1 u0 7>RNMSY4TNox KING COUNTY.WASNNNGTCW. - toff C09RIDOR: 1. 15 MS POVERTY 6 SUBJECT 10 THE M VLH1EN 1ORH4 AID COMMONS 0f A HARR LI AS AND(KEPI A11'POR10N THEREOF MC SORHERLY Of 1HE PUGET BOARD(145(0, RECORDED UNDER RECORDY,G NO. ).M790.01,RECORDS Of PING COUNTY• I NC.I1OR • YERST PuC(7 SOUND P01(R 4/ M EC COYPNff)5M/ AN H1W FIE1ON NO.1 D 7 W15Oi0N 1 IRARSYSSON C CORRIDOR If A LAI I-,._ ! RECORDING CERTIFICATE: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: `E1�c(� GHA(� WAY N 'a'RY YL RE4,r WE u(uc.i9 rr u(REc.]o r^ AO1NrIPPq No 1H..m N.^r.11 fw+..++.bowl.+N A...,n,.n 1 s `- S 18215 72N0 AVENUE SOUTH tKW IOWWNUP P]IIO1M.RWOE 0 EAST,W.Y. SHT III,R.,.„.,.,, 1.HI..- » .w.T•.r r PR.N. P In KENT, WA 98032 10/29/98 .4.0 r t�w.'r pip* ..r W..•..�.r r A"r°i"+" rc. LyoY•_• 1P°` itfl Q7 ?' (125)251-fi222 Y"L 1PUGET B31S NORTWESTERN. CHEEK PARKWAY 1 Ihrrwo.-Cr...,n"..` ` ; o ' (/25)251-ITM FAX DEDun 11 E� SUITE 310aZ)/ �+ s .0(14 pv,G BOTHEU,WA S0011 OF i MAMA RA17lT.i.i �iL7 iY a�' CMS ENGINEERING.IAAD P1AH4NG. BBB7 • U.,,� E„•,.-,,....,.I(,.,,y 1�.fL OS-10-9R PiyR Wa SuRv(1wG.[NLVNONUEHTN SE RACES AYYECI w: 4 N.+'^PI-AMP•.N�N bi,r ,,-.-•• ■LAG CITY OF flENTON KING COUNTY F WA I. _ c LUA-98-184-LLA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LNI1-030.01TT A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST.W.M. 1 CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON i _ . . •1 SCALE 1- a 200' ' i • ,wNNmM.FAG ly 1 - . r ii .. / • Yb SURVEYOR'S NOTES \ , 9 /,,,,: / I.ME BUN AGS SWAM RENEON REFER TD NM 1953/91 AND ARE USED ON Cm ` • 1•--� / Or RENTON CONICL POLAR 90 AID EIL 2.Mi.BILE ifORTMION 9ON1 ON MS MAP TM DEIN COLICI=That 196T Mrt1N'JN I /.-.r I/"-- ..! 6 RRE NSURMICE COMPANY S11aDINSiON CZAARATrtEE IA,396aai-9M,DATED + / 9S�Al�o I� I OCTOBER 19.199a. IN PREPARING THIS REAP.BARCFUUSEN CONSULTING `d W ENCREERS.NC.ma CODUCIEO NO 94EPOIOEM ISLE SEAa01 N011 6 9UBXWSEM 9 % CONSULTING EiToNEEN0.SEC.AWARE Of ALAI THE ISSUES AFFEL-19EG THE 441460EO 8 / S PROPERLY OREN MN TNOSE 90*14 ON IRE NAP ANO DISCLOSED IN 144E RDEROKET F 1 C FIRST AYCMCJN SUa0m90N GUARANTEE. BW0WJSEN CONSULTING(9834 S.NC. Of ' �J i NAS 9910LLT ON NM/ANON AAES REPRESENON@d Of nt TIRYS CONCRICN TO i y� / I ' PAVAP O95 SURN.Y MD THEREFORE aAIICEW60E CONSlE1NG ENGINEERS.91C. F.,V' / /yT� RI NwP'S ACC1 Nc/AND COEFIE 1DIL S TO MET=N / 14'✓ A - Y L AIL 06TANCES ARE N FW BLS-WWI FTE� i ,,'- �', 9 N '- A.R6 6 A RID TRAM SUNtI. A 50100E S't1ECIR0IIC IObI SQ7f09 SAS I15FD 10 I ^^/f / / 'E YEISWIE 111E/l,GNR.AR AND OKTANCC ROJ.110NSI9P5 WW2?MC CONTROLLING . '+;� YOMIENIAl1AN AS STOrN. O.D99E MII05!K TIlE IMNASE NET OA f]C®fD IMSE SPECYIEa N PAC 332-130-090. 65LANCE YEAUIPoHG[ONAPN[M MS BEEN j EMIEIR IED Al AN NG.S.SLSGNE NOUN ONE YEAR OC THE DATE 1X MS Urinal. a C—� • I i C_ + i _ ' • c` %a 14 T Y -.•pt I a �� v' u _1 5,` - E C�=. - 1 AL w.w w EW VE KC.1T 9E UE SEC.19-NH LE 9LG.99 c �.���ct?s QGF1Al/Ys 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH a6 - - TOwNNW iTUK AINIOE E EAST.W.Y. SHT 1 i'i �QR 1(A, si: Q• �/ '$ KENT,WA 98032 EO/29/9B �"^�'10' �I` �� -•"� �' (E25)251-6222 sc+i 1-- 200 PUOET WESTERN,INC_ 2 � 19510 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY I _il ,i - (425)251-8782 FAX uuTan - SUITE310 • 1 . 'Tien I S / i RWG SOTHELL.WA Ya011 OF .D C•EIT1N f Or b- EARL ENGINEERING.LAND PLANNING. n Yl 66B) ti t 0A i - ' n-+1'OS�la 99 `lAI4C ENOIME�e SURVEYwG.E/M1TRONU(N1AL SERdRS °1mO'o CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WA i LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT `UA-98-184-LEA IAD-030-0177 . I A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14 THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE. 5 EAST,W.M. CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON ..5‘ :� r . 1 sal _ 13' \` , / • SCALE 1- = 100. r ,• ' • °JL \ ,. c y� \ nu4 J Kt °� cs y 40URd1 a q ,. IZ ! • [141MC.% -1 1 ISO ,,, o r • / 146-G UK DatgP - 14 o- i. u•E I 'DIM gtaS i i . . LI. SeT51'2.41, 572I0 1 I S-a -- / I 12 317714l2*4 7 30m' i ♦ CD U 500571411 I5.49 4 Ca - IA Urine, 10.44 .p(� 15 W4TIT271( 2B.00 i 2'"Q y U i Iut. '!4 0T •1 / Lf MD'I424 11.00 1 4 _ {i'STz c♦ 40 S3a1411 27.40 I $ ,Z. -+4 / - . Lf f2f4f2Pl nal -qf• 1 O it ,.IA. P • • 1 o mason sss! 1 Y 2 • 0 $s / C 5• 111 NDf41TfY sour IS 2• . U2 5172/030 n.71 i I 47� t ' - 1 US WoalTIf l 10.70 .I 0 V / i _ . . L14 WDa44•NT mu CAW TAIL + L- DIM LINT H MOW DOA UMW I !` .A, CI N.71 4771N ar5f10. 24.90 1 yr I A' C2- 11.72 110154 OZN'40• 13.51 ,, f / r Cl 121,11 11N.15 mall' MI Z f i U4 •• . C5 22537 5o7.N 272Tbf• 114.Y if 4ei•3aaal �• / - _ • .CI I81.55 1M.11- Dnep' '1045 S wcOOK If I C♦ /J(/ . 1/7 xDVA 40 CM WC 2022f- _ C) b�1 N7.N nine NA1 Y i0 BC SEE CO I10.7t N7.N worst 17.N I IlK1 I ��((•�' , _ ID - (IXUA1 I-7/0•BRASS IWODDf/WC it Cl t4N f71►3 BT}t'!1' 4022 1 "7 I I - 1 C70 f204 .11 /1W211 OTf1'40' f0.40 1 7 ar4fp'r (( -, CII 150.70 125420 of(711• CS-SC . 1' - CI s1.51 4200 00.2fir 4122 }- run' j u4 /V 1 s ;�f • . I s. • I ? r a , d 'til 1 I d S' �O. 1 .j.- N Lc, 1 - • L - I IA4......... • •o....P �1 WAV4 ML D W[V4/EG 11-MW V4 tE0.20 CST^ . • .,,..:ill, -!5 47f�. RA"A[JSi IB215 72LID AVENUE SOUTH PCw• IBwtlu4v 121�OII7N.IARBI I fall.4( SH 1 I 1� s� Q' w KENT•WA 99032 arc 10/2s/95 0a4." ,1 l I' ,t • T t7 ' Z (425j251-6222 S[142: PUQET WESTERN INC. 4 e� I!• �l���!l1��11 ..al- 1- IOU MI5 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY F`,7G� E. ..I - (425j251-N)E2 FAY `R'�1 SUITE 310 OF •........`1 -. / .44 "' BOTHELL•WA 95011 A I 0.a1j ♦` /.- [M t4CLCERwG,LM10 PUNNING. 6607 'i 1•y9 , C. A.au•0," 51.R1rnn.G.E/MAONU(NIAL SUIv10E5 /"...W.' CITY Of RENTON KINOICOUNTY WA • L — '•_ -- -• I r..r • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-98-,84-"A UM-030-0117 • A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17,THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 19,AND THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20 ia,�o-�1D I I ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 6 EAST,W.M. 9tii 01 1 CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTO• 14-a-B SCALE 1" = 100' .• 1 2 1 k �• UDC K MOM Y / EI sof]f3tt 9703 •• II■ u D13Imr24 t 3000 e.emir U sonnet 1349 11.1101 L4 57r74•lrw Sail f 7-31 1 u N611r3717. 35m 1 I f • r rrx'lr r l)-S1E32 o2 E I/ 1 IS 1133I4 24'C a1.10 / r I ` sax' RW-Wr33'13t 7n r u ffi01P14Y 77.40 A.saltsT I / .S1)vt, (._ • (10 147353'00'r 3137 • • A-FM ul 14eryYY1[ soro • r ♦; �• ,�I Ef6'•- ,. 0 u, a}•' 1 lrsnrD la/u) L17 Nersa•240 0.7e 'i - L •• Z 114 1lOV44'4j 11.71 ip :-11 LN, ♦ k! OJR•E Dar I : �/ �� �-6• • !: ••k O ........... - F lira'- 1.2 t[r47•fr 7 co Mai 11141 1 KM[K Jr3 TA1C24. Cl 4a.Ta 1771.ea_ �1'II'IO• f4.a0 MOO w,w w(-••_--•''-1-__-- P.Ee:72 Y x'37Jr I El(ta' - _ Cl Y.73 teal e• atH'4e' u.33 n 0191m VIM -'-•--4.._.- _ f44) P./0313.C 2 G 121.74 1144.0 aros'31• al u 5 rt1'17'lr•• 1['7 o.-_- •.S[ _. MIda SF _ le w C5 m67 507.44 73•I101• 112.0 on Of ROOM NUS? r WU'fr r '�a ,,.113�`aRY' - -.'-'' !"WI'. :n• our-� 1 G IN37 170.11 4rfabM qm comma,am..l w nu' Oi Y r 1 wrn•sr s < 67 LL!) 447.44 Irmo-' 44 41 Di �•l �p LOT 1l( n ua31 H7.w 1far31 Ss N i `Oawro in)`.s` • ar�f,m111101�[ ` a Lau r74J3 QSSri1' w7 {4 1/ u°r Ma 1 C10 IMaI Ia*Da 07frla•' a0-Y a� ♦N. �, 011 I7a70 ,71.0 01'Ifl!' as-y /�Q _[IS11• CI] wsa 4•3E 00•741C, 47.11 J� r r 1 LOGI a1 d 4I DV 021174 Lam 7. V' G wtf • _ rilihRi • 1/2 REB1A ABO W•9CE ra2A- .�•f la if SE7f / ' ,- O Q'`� ® - /uU,af-)/a'M4fYV[DWl[RAC sEi 1,OfE�\ tit6�, 1 1�A1om\ fs :0,h S !F �' fOOPLii17 fEA[w RR.C50 ABIaToo J.f.Dn60N IOV[7 96tQ II M 1011 10 W1Er. YCEILR[LOPES I01 CaS MO ILLS$[JW11m ro 1uc CWI tl OE[0 1am0K0 L t[Ws01i .'G �r� I J / 10 n7171s OJAI u4 f1 SY[1[0&C UR a=OC/ n 1Hl[Dill ROPE fd4 KK 10 NMI i t• ! 9 \ �y q // c 1wa[wrt pinta Ot ofCcaom.n54.03.w ncr(iaa C0410Nff a.wf01W.i awn T.7"-� 1 • GSGLW. 0[M7(tO[NC0 F05A fa III IOWOL Of l f.1660a st.to ut 6i uO COW7 :'u1� �.\ ` ,� 441101•f Ma morn 110N MT mei at DODO 11f Uo 001101 Raft 10 1001-0 I1OSE [% /- , moms SL1E0 M1I auss 7u0f Wt(so w DE 0@[l1E moo 91021E(P4L9,W711,110 11(550 r (06191L1Y4( h0 Or net ROCS MSS IOUs part 01R f100 95141.0t AI 51M1101 10.4I17 1 • \ ` .' Aa0 at A SLO .32.w D00 C aQ0 109ID14 ACK■OM 07 MT OF KM 1,t04E11C/l .3. ` /�' a1„RIi10 808110a 1104 AE 19N fr1D IOIfS. RESE 101at1R Kx OSm f0 Eft106M OE 1r`-_\ ___!m! �!_ 10,D s01(-Of-1u1 Of]0 R[1 Oa[K71 59E Of Ot(f111[Itllt w fDm16[l 11f).M sum-x-slr • _.. P1A14 fOR SR-W7 KI,E.,PP1D.m. w 0t Win Cr mat 0t[L6hc►1u0 ia•eE,401 kW -- [1Cl0,Otf 0t 1n6(an M Il�O11$,t10(Laf110 71t Ldf-ar-ur III go 1 058411 • O \ • & 1.5 10 N.rol n[GUMS*00-01-IA,Cr a1[2dS0a 1010. 1(13 46![(U},9Oot 0.1 11t MC Y - f , Of Pt ROPE faa at 1u(Cl 71-105 6 ROM I FIST OF Ot 1171I111[04(r DIE OD EOt1l7[ - _ LYY{E O1'Of OEM01 a0,0. 0 WI 9E OW SODA Ot W11f1RC1101 Of Wan.a O1S a[ma+t0 aW of FOE Of 11t 1u s1S D00[IDSE 10 Pt MAID fur Of 1040s 0O4D NO 1•01 0t t �� r win,-7 I. ' Rf„D 1u5 BEAtfwEO 100.117 1sESO0 PaLtal tO1 1DW S,fi11f CO,Qwa WNtNIL1.10 npalOaN. • - °ydf o \ ( nisi' J ,t- /7 d a011 1t rn,am wcE1 saw ro.Es s w0 mrwr At ac C0.41*tD[o a0w 10.34.011. 1 10CAlua 01 4 . -_�:J it•��f1E�[�3• _•.- V41 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH �'•"pi PCW fOwU SIC.SSUMi01471 i•EASI WU.G 3a SHT •p :t v F KENT, WA 98032 nu 10/29/90 Lva1u s 4811 K• (425)251-6222 SCALEI " la0 PUGET WESTERN.INC. 3 �' eil9., -I n ,; (425)251-8782 FAX bosun Lt.R., SUITS NORTH CREEK PARKWAY -r SUITE 310 OF-_J a;`,i 1141 od Su6 0 CM(EN(u1EESODC•lANO Pl)710N0, 'd'0- "660) 80TNEE�WA UIUII 1 too f 7i tE� 5U(I EYMC.EIMRONuENT2L STRmCES rotn.6. 4 t, • 1\�.-11 03-1a-99• '� *alma.- CITY OF RENTON KINA COUNTY WA • I 1 Es I • • AFTER RECORDING MAIL.TO: Name Puget Sound Energy Address One Bellevue Center 411-108t Ave.N.E. City/State Bellevue,WA 98004 Document Title(s):(or transactions contained therein) First American Title 1. Master Easement •�� Insurance Company 2. • rgl 3. C$Qa -5 C 4. a) 3 Tal Reference Numbers)of Documents assigned or released: o u�(�- N Ohl,:pace/or(Sk cornpmry we only) r1 Additional numbers on page_of document Cat f"I Grantor(s):(Last name first,then first name and initials) W I.Puget Western,Inc. Cr) 2. 3. 4. 5. Additional names on page_of document Grantee(s):(Last name first,then first name and initials) 1.Puget Sound Energy,Inc 2. 3. , 4. "' 5. Additional names on page_of document Abbreviated Legal Description as follow!:(i.e.Iot/block/plat or section/township/range/quarter/quarter) , 3` Section 17 Twp 23N Rng 5E SW'/SW'V, Section I9 Twp 23N Rng 5E E YA NE'/. ` Section 20 Twp 23N Rng 5E GL 1 in NW'/. -ri r� C '_, ,, Blocks 1.2 Wal rth 1• „ , 11 L`.`� . swo s Add.VolYol6,P8.23 .. , t.. r/ _ f,- ., .__,\e, ';�;14:-a 3 • Complete legal description is on page 9 of document 1,t• `' El Assessor's Property Tax ParceUAcwant Number(!): 972500-0751-06,172305.9072-03, 192305-9091-08,202305-9006-09,202305.9007-08r 202305-9008-07,202305-9037-02,202305-9050-04,202305-9146-00,202305-902E-03, "`"""' • 915460-001G-00 do 192305-9090-09 -- ,;((.. ,EP$ION No. ss� s 4 RECORDPA AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Puget Sound Energy One Bellevue Center 411—108th Ave.N,E. Bellevue,WA 98004 PUGET SOUND ENERGY MASTER EASEMENT • For and in consideration of One Dollar(S1.00)and other valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,Puget Western,Inc.,a Washington corporation-("Grantor"herein),hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY,INC.,a Washington corporation("Grantee"herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth,a perpetual nonexclusive easement over,under,along,across and through the following described real property(the"Property"herein)in King County,Washington. See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon those portions of the Property(the"Easement Areas"herein)described as follows; existing facilities,as-built,shown on that certain Barghausen Survey dated June 1e,ail 9 1998,last re eas are basevupon uised July 1/1 30, 1998,Job No.6687 and further shown on the easement exhibit attached as Exhibit B]. 1,.4 A. Transmission Line Easement Area steel tower line: ;`• EASEMENT A ord All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Ran e 5 and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Ran e 5 gEast,W.M., Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: g 'W.M.,City of A strip of land, 100 feet in width,lying 50 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 20°03'21 "West,626.75 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 89°29'49"East,61.02 feet; THENCE South 78°26' 19"East,746.06 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. B. Transmission Line Easement Area(three(3)separate single wood pole lines),each such easement area fifty(50)feet in width having twenty-five(25)feet of such width on each side of three separate centerlines described as follows: EASEMENT B 1 • All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W,M.,City of Renton,King County, Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet on each side of the following described auernent centerline: • • COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.31 feet distant; THENCE South 24°08'45"West,590.33 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of °` Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE South 81°57'34"East,24.55 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point"A"; THENCE South 81'ST 34"East,728.01 fat; THENCE North 22'02' 14"East,442.59 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of Benson Road South and the terminus of the described line. TOGETHER WITH a strip of land, 10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline; BEGINNING at the aforementioned Point"A"; THENCE North 11°18'35"East,65.00 feet to the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. - EASEMENT B2 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quu:-ter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 13°38'13"West,724.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-S 15,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; red THENCE South 77°58'12"East,711.03 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of 1111 SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. N EXCEPT any r_rtien thereof lying within the right-a-way of Benson Road South. CNTI Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate 011 at the described right-of-way margins, EASEMENT B3 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M.,Clity of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,50 feet in width,lying 25 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89'42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 39°38'55"East,879.45 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 27'22' I 1 "West,139.12 feet; THENCE South 77°58'09"East,48.63 feet to the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. C. Trannsmissioqline Eat<emeat Areot for each of three(3)separate"H-Frame"wood pole lines, each such easement area being sixty(60)feet in width having thirty(30)feet of such width on each side of three separate centerlines described as follows: p:: cl.1.l iJ'4 i is L "t![' 7.1 i;'If•i l', � .il,Lii 13 EASEMENT Cl All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section!9,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,• and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: 9 A strip of land,60 feet in width,lying 30 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter comer of said Section 19 bears North 89°42' 16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 22.00'58"East, 1116.15 feet to a point on the.Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 87°I3'01"West,309.11 feet; THENCE North 38°16'46"East,60.00 feet; THENCE South 38°16'46"West,60.00 feet; THENCE South 87°54'37"West,63,00 feet; THENCE North 87°54'37"East,63.00 feet; . THENCE South 41°09'03"West,333.60 feet; THENCE South 53°31'58"West,59.45 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. tr,1 EASEMENT C2 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., 1.4 and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,60 feet in width,lying 30 feet on each side of the following dcsc ib:d c iicnt centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 19°31'49"East,1150,29 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 87°25'28"West,254.58 feet; THENCE North 42°54'41"East 63.00 feet; • THENCE South 42°54'41"West,63.00 feet; THENCE North 88°45'13"West,78.00 feet; THENCE South 88°45' 13"East,78.00 feet; THENCE South 39°19'23"West,335.04 feet; THENCE North 78°44'10"West.75.00 feet; THENCE South 78°44'10"East,75.00 feet; • THENCE South 35°43' 16"West,62.50 feet; • • THENCE South 09°54'39"East,163.78 feet to a point on the Northwesterly right-of-way margin of SR-405 and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. EASEMENT C3 • All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Rehton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,60 feet in width,lying 30 feet on each aide of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'I 6"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 06°35'30"West, 1412.87 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-S 15,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 64°20'48"East,473.39 feet; THENCE South 87°25'28"East,30.42 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of Sit- 405 a and the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of SR-405. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. D. Distribution Line Easement Area for four(4)separate single wood pole lines,two(2)along Talbot Road. Two(2)running east and west,each such easement area being ten(10)feet in width having five(5)feet of such width on each side of four(4)separate centerlines described as follows: EASEMENT DI All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East.W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land, 10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 44°19'22"West,408.98 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; voi THENCE South 10'12'53"East,53.88 feet; THENCE South 17°16'55"East,201.48 feet; L+j THENCE South I7°08' IS"East,212.61 feet; THENCE South 01°25'GI"East,37.69 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the terminus of the described line. r-i Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. • Cr EASEMENT D2 • All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land, 10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of said Section 19,from which point theNorth quaver corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 43°38'53"West,384.49 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 15°59'24"East,108.09 feet; THENCE South 13°44'58"East,233.71 feet; . THENCE South 23°31'44"East, 146.98 feet; THENCE South 04°23' 10"West,241.94 feet; THENCE South 07°II'23"West,36.60 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margins. ; EASEMENT D3 • ,: All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., 4 U 1;1 1 w. and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of, Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,10 feet In width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter 11: corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 08°14'46"West,995.62 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road South,a.k.a.SR-515,and the POINT OF BEGINNING; • THENCE North 85°44'29"East,480.65 feet; THENCE North 47'I0' 13"East,219,08 feet to the terminus of the described line. EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within the right-of-way of Benson Road South. . Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate t at the described right-of-way margins. EASEMENT D4 All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 Worth,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton.King County,Washington,described as follows: A strip of land,10 feet in width,lying 5 feet on each side of the following described casement centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 beers North 89°42'16"West,2661.81 feet distant; THENCE South 39°38'55"East,879.45 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way margin of SR-405; THENCE South 27 20'32"West, 11.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 504 2T 45"West,67.83 feet to the terminus of the described line. • Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. E. Fiber Ootic Line Easement Ares: i-i EASEMENT E tit M All that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., and of the Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of P° Renton,King County,Washington,described as follow.. 04 1.4 A strip of land, 10 feet in width,lying 5 feat on each side of the following described easement CO centerline: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 19,from which point the North quarter corner of said Section 19 bears North 89°42'16"West,2661.8 I fret distant; . ' THENCE South 34°37'13"West,199.08 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way margin of South Grady Way and the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 4l°33'32"West,156.90 feet; THENCE South 10°20'52"West,102.55 feet to the terminus of the described line. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to intersect at angle points and to terminate at the described right-of-way margin. F. Road Frontage Easement: ,- EASEMENT F l r`s All that portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 17,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., `,,; j;, t: '' the Northeast quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,and of the ==°• Northwest quarter of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range S East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County,Washington,described as follows: ` • A strip of land 15 feet in width,the Northerly boundary of which is coincident with the Southerly margin of South Grady Way;a strip of land 15 feet in width,the Westerly boundary of which is Coincident with the Easterly margin of Talbot Road;a strip of land 15 feet in width,the Easterly boundary of which is coincident with the Westerly margin of Benson Road;and a strip of Ind 15 feet in width,the Westerly boundary of which is coincident with the Easterly margin of Benson Road. Extending or shortening the sidelines of said easement to terminate at the boundaries gibe grantor's property. VI 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the right to operate,maintain,repair,replace,improve,remove, enlarge and use one or more electric transmission and/or distribution systems over and/or.under the Easement Areas,together with ail necessary or convenient appurtenances thereto,which said systems may include but are not limited to the following: a. Overhead facilities. Poles and/or towers with crossarms,braces,guys and anchors; electric transmission and distribution lines;fiber optic cable,communication and signal lines and transformers. b. Underground facilities. Underground conduits,cables,vaults,manholes,switches and transformers;semi-buried or ground mounted facilities such as pads,transformers and switches;fiber optic cable,communication and signal lines. Following the initial construction of all or a portion of its systems,Grantee may,from time to time,construct such additional facilities as it may require for its systems subject to the limitations set forth below and in no event constructed in such a way place or manner so as to impair Grantor's use of the Property consistent with the language set forth in paragraph number 5 below. 2. Access. Following forty-eight(48)hours prior notice,save and except emergency circumstances (at which time Grantee may immediately access the Easement Areas),Grantee shall have the right of access to the Easement Areas over and across the Property to enable Grantee to reasonably exercise its rights hereunder. Grantee shall repair or compensate Grantor for all damage to the Property,including any damage to Grantor's inventory,improvements,parking areas,landscaping,equipment,other items of personal property,roads,crops,driveways and fences caused by the exercise of such right of access. 3. Easement Area Clearing and Maintenance. Following forty-eight(48)hours prior written notice,and Grantor's consent,which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or delayed, Grantee shall have the right to cut,remove and dispose of any and all brush,trees and other vegetation presently existing upon the Easement Area and which impairs the use of Grantee's system constructed within the Easement Areas,Grantee shall also have the right to control,on a continuing basis and by any prudent and reasonable means,the establishment and growth of bush,trees and other vegetation upon the awl Easement Area which could,in the reasonable opinion of Grantee,reasonably interfere with the exercise of Grantee's rights herein or create a hazard to Grantee's systems. Grantor's landscaping shall not be damaged, (or if damaged,shall be restored by Grantee,to Grantor's satisfaction),unless and except to the extent that • gni such landscaping could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or create a hazard to Grantees systems u4 4. Trees Outside Easement Area. So long as not in violation of any applicable law,and following Grantor's prior written approval which approval will not be unreasonably conditioned,withheld or delayed, CC Grantee shall have the right to cut,trim,remove and dispose of any trees located on the Property outside the Easement Areas which could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or create a hazard to Grantee's systems.Grantor shall be entitled to compensation for trees cut,trimmed,removed or disposed of,including the actual market value of merchantable timber(if any)cut and removed from the Property by Grantee. Grantor's landscaping shall not be damaged,(or if damaged,shall be restored by Grantee to Grantor's satisfaction)unless and except to the extent that such landscaping could,in Grantee's reasonable judgment,substantially interfere with or create a hazard to Grantee's systems 5. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Areas for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted,provided,that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings,on the Easement Areas and Grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feet of Grantee's systems without Grantee's prior written consent. Subject to the foregoing,Grantee has Grantor's consent to use the Easement Areas for uses relating to commercial parking lots or auto sales lots,including • landscaping(not more than fifteen(15)feet high)asphalt and concrete and other similar types of materials (provided Grantee may cut and patch the same at Grantee's cost)and constructing non-metalic kiosk-type sitting areas substantially similar to the non-metalic kiosk-type sitting area illustrated at Exhibit C attached hereto(not more than 12 feet high)and incorporated herein by reference. . 6. Indemnity. Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor from and against all liability incurred by Grantor as a result of the negligence or willful acts of Grantee or its,and employees,but nothing herein shall require Grantee to indemnify Grantor for that portion of any such liability judicially determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be attributable to the negligence or willful acts of Grantor,. 7. Abandonment. The rights herein granted to Grantee shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use any or all the Easement Areas for a period of ten(10)successive years,in which event said - • Easement Areas shall immediately self-terminate and all rights hereunder shall revert to Grantor,providing - . the remaining portions of the easement areas which are or have been used within said tea years are not ,1 terminated. ✓" 8. Successors and Assigns. Grantee shall have the right to assign a portion or otherwise transfer any or all of its rights,benefits,privileges and interests arising in and under this Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. • 9. Stanchion Radius. Gramor expressly reserves the right to pave andfor asphalt within a radius of five(5)feet from any stanchion,pole,tower,brace,guy,anchor,etc. Grantor's paving andfor asphalting shall not impair Grantee's ability to use the Easement Areas for the purposes set forth herein. 10. Grantee's Construction of New Underground Utility Lines. From and after the recordation date of this Easement,Grantee may not lay,install or construct a new underground utility line,of any type, within the Easement Areas,without Grantor's prior written approval,which approval shall not be • unreasonably withheld,conditioned or delayed. Further,Grantee may not take any action not expressly granted herein which impacts in any way Grantor's development and use of the Property. 11. Notice. All notices required or permitted to be given heretmder stall be in writing and shall be personally delivered,sent by U.S.certified mail,postage prepaid,return receipt requested,telecopy or by overnight courier service,addressed as set forth below: (a) All notices to be given to Grantee shall be addressed as follows: Puget Sound Energy One Bellevue Center 411—108th Ave.N.E. Bellevue,WA 98004 Ann: Manager Real Estate Telefax: (425)462-3519 (b) All notices to be given to Grantor shall be addressed as follows: Puget Western,Inc. ' Z1') 19515 North Creek Parkway,Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 +11 Atm: President • Telefax: (425)487-6565 /14 Either party hereto may,by proper notice to the other,designate such other address for the giving of notices as deemed newsl,ary. All notices shall be deemed given on the day each such notice is Cr) personally dclivu,.d,tr...:iutr`..::d by telecopy(with evidence of receipt)or rlpliveRrsi by nvernight courier service,or on the third day following the day such notice is mailed if mailed In accordance with this section. Failure to deliver a copy of a notice to a"copy"parry shall not effect the validity of Stich notice,as such copies are for the convenience of the parties only. • Dated this l- day of December.1998. GRANTOR Puget Western,Inc. J,� BY r/X�_'7'� ITS President • � ,.. .r• ..:,�'t'•�:;` _iy[,:��'i.gt}�1�t�!,+.d1;�.µ'•%�.=L;�ss'!++.-:.fit.. 4k^y�H i �. .__...__......._• . STATE OF Washington) ) SS COUNTY OF g 1 r1 Ce ) On this day personally appeared before me R.B.Boyd,to me known to be the President of Puget SVesleim, Inc. the entity that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said entity,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that be was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corpocate seal of said corporation. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this i 7' day of 314•d.• 1998. .. Notary Public in and for the State of }Lcidutg at CG,,,/T'n�/ r c3▪ ' kOIARY ▪ •• T- My commission expires 14N4• It/ et72- •IIIf 111111' v� N r.l 1 Gd • • • • EXHIBIT"A" • Order No. 380714-5X • DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS 445 .3 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE NORTH 150 FEET; THENCE WEST 57.3 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH GRADY WAY; 14.4 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 1.11 SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; OP, THENCE EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1.4 r. PARCEL B: v`4 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST Op QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, • PAGE 23, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10, SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 AT A POINT 528.00 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 53.00 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT • LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 232.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 817107, WHICH LINE IS PARALLEL WITH AND 445. 30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTIONS 17 AND 20; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO RENTON CO • - OPERATIVE COAL COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1900 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200930; , THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 528.00 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 ; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN MAIN AVENUE SOUTH • (BENSON ROAD SOUTH) AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2827715. a EXHIBIT"A" PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2, SECTION 20, ■ TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5732439 AND 4924770; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10, SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SAID SECTION 20, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LIEN OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 AT A POINT 528.00 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 53.00 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 10, A DISTANCE OF 232.46 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND TRACTION, 1.4 LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER CIKING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 817107, WHICH LINE IS PARALLEL WITH AND 445.30 FEET EAST F THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTIONS ri 17 AND 20; N THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO e'•��. THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO RENTON CO- '�.,' OPERATIVE COAL COMPANY BY DEED REc tw .s LJECEHBER Lb, 1508 Cl UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 200930; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE..OF THE EAST 528.00 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPT PORTIONS THEREOF LYING WITHIN BENSON ROAD SOUTH AND SOUTH GRADY WAY; AND EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF BENSON ROAD SOUTH. PARCEL E: THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING THE UNNUMBERED TRACTS ADJOINING THE LOTS IN BLOCK 1, WALSWORTH'S FIRST ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 23, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH GRADY •WAY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 8TH AVENUE VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 2850, WHICH ATTACHED THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. • PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST • QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND LYING NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. ' 1, AS,CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5754046. (CONTINDED) it,'' • EXHIB1T"A" DESCRIPTION CONT. ORDER NO. 380714 PARCEL G: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,, LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF PRIMARY STATE-HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 5732439 AND 4924770; EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF BENSON ROAD SOUTH; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE JOHN F. • BENSON COUNTY ROAD (BENSON ROAD SOUTH) WHICH IS SOUTH 25°44'34" EAST 934 .11 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 0°38' WEST 389.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; • THENCE SOUTH 0°38' WEST 109.14 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE • SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 88°55' WEST 183.03 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID JOHN F. BENSON COUNTY ROAD; 01 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD, 113.23 FEET; ' v,4 THENCE NORTH 88°55' EAST 157.24 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF t' BEGINNING. NALL SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 00 • • • EXHIBIT"Fr EASEMENT EXHIBIT . / /' / ; . 1r(it /• ' . Ifgr / . • is A .. A - < - • / / 11. v4 VI V ' :' .. •, . 4.1 .-'• N , ri ......-"; .. • .• T.4 4 ' ' • , ..... .. / -I, f• .--- ---..-•-....,;:.'..:•.,..-.-::•_. _.--, .•.:-.... ..._ • i .. ' " ' . • - ,-.:-....-...--.t...,. -.- - •.,•-.--:,:!-....- . ..:.--;•::'"- *-:•:•::::.-......- -,. . ...... \\\ lit . #.... . . . ‘ . . • 01111 4' " /111111re: Jr. . / .. ie, ar : • - .: . / . . • .,...": ::.'... i / . . • f . ".. ....,.,. ..., z' 1 VOIII- \ . i VIP. . ••.. • :,:,.f••C '''...> / ,1 : ;:l° I . i J lip Pi t i i�} n1. �x IIJllillrlliftlgllilulllfl;iI1it i K: . . —1.`13 l II iva t .•'.._.g 7 Ili IIIIJIJI 1 i i R a.►a . — ;IF ;IS ;F! irt1I ll•dNix I‘.I..e_.i50k nu g .I !: sal e`1 .•1'‘,.._./...:1I2. i} s r_ 11 :1 4 ., � /tiIt ti t �l�ti T, 7 : -e ArAdar.r r ..... g ., i !lit 2 i ,,_ 1 R Okr, !.t-1 1i- i �= iif , 111� 1E"Ii' fis >N T � q� � CP � 1 !, i .... 1 J 0- . ..... ... ,___ ! :D ! COI > gt \ . 1 tCp.'It--,44:,...=_-_9? I 5, CO 1 :D V 'D I t Ci ..0,..LIBIHX1 •4 • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Puget Western,Inc. 19515 North Creek Parkway,Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 • \IIII111III1IIIIIKING COUNTY, tiCI ^ FIRST FONNICAM COV 11.E RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Owner: Puget Western,Inc. Ecology:Washington State Department of Ecology Abbreviated Legal: Block 1-2,Walsworth's First Add.To Renton,Vol 6,P 23. and Sections 19&20 Township 23 N Range 5 EWN Full Legal Description on page(s)' 3 Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s)•2023059007 D K805-2N7 s Parcel 3-Formerly Part of the Puget 1ST -S Sound Energy Grady Way Complex Property �►7733 915 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington m This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is made pursuant to RCW 70 105D.030(1)(f)and(g) and WAC 173-340-440 by Puget Western,Inc.(Owner)its successors and assigns,and the State of o Washington Department of Ecology,its successors and assigns(hereafter"Ecology"). An independent remedial action(hereafter"Remedial Action")occurred at the property that is the subject of this Restrictive Covenant. The Remedial Action conducted at the property is described in the c., following documents whie'.r are on file at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office. 0 1. Final Report-Ground Water Quality Testing,Underground Transformer Oil Tank,Service Center,Renton,Washington-January 15, 1988. 2. Final Report-Tank Removal and Soil Excavation,Underground Transformer Oil,Tank Service Center,Renton,Washington"-March 3, 1988.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-61-4. 3. Environmental Site Assesstnent,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,Washington-April 29, 1998. By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/042998. 4. 1998 Site CIeanup Activities,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,Washington(Volumes I and 1 1)-December 23, 1998.By Geo-Engineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150. 5. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,First Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-June 7, 1999.By Geo-Engineers,Project No.0186-407-00-I 150/060799. 6. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Second Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-July 22, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-I 150/72299. 7. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Third Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-December 21,1999 By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186.407-00-122199. 8. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Fourth Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-November 24, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00- 1150/112499. 9. Supplemental Site Characterization and Site Closure Report,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-December 21,1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00- 1150/122199 This Restrictive Covenant is required because the Remedial Action resulted in leaving residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon,polychlorinated biphenyl(PCB)and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Toxics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater established under WAC 173-340-740 w«i IExcEpTo , 7 • The undersigned,Puget Western,Inc,is the fee owner of real property(hereafter"Property")in • the County of King,State of Washington,that is subject to this Restrictive Covenant. The Property is commonly known as Parcel 3 of the former Puget Sound Energy Grady Way Complex site(see attaeheri map)and is legally described in exhibit A-3(attached). Puget Western,Inc.,makes the following declaration as to limitations,restrictions,and uses to which the Property may be put and specifies that such declarations shall constitute covenants to run with the:.uhd,as provided by law and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them, including all current and future owners of any portion of or interest in the Property(hereafter"Owner"). Section 1. The Property contains residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon,PCB and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Tonics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater. During at least one past ground water monitoring event,dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and PCBs have been detected in monitoring well GMW-4/4a(see attached map); dissolved arsenic has been detected in GMW-3/3a,GMW-10 and GMW-1 1 Section 2. No groundwater may be taken from the Property fur any use. Section 3. Any activity an the Property that may interfere with the integrity of the Remedial - Action and continued protection of human health and the environment is prohibited. • Section 4. Any activity on the Property that may result in the release or exposure to the environment of a hazardous substance that remains in ground water beneath the Property as part of the Remedial Action,or create a new exposure pathway,is prohibited without prior written approval from Ecology. Section 5. The Owner of the property must give thirty(30)day advance written notice to Ecology of the Owner's intent to convey any interest in the Property. No conveyance of tide,easement, lease,or other interest in the Property shall be consummated by the Owner without adequate and complete provision for continued monitoring,operation and maintenance of the Remedial Action, The Owner conveying any interest in the property shall notify Ecology of the name,mailing address and telephone number of the person or persons who acquired the title,easement,lease,or other interest in the Property within fifteen(15)days of the transaction. Section 6. The Owner must restrict leases to uses and activities consistent with the Restrictive `b Covenant and notify all lessees of the restrictions on the use of the Property. N Section 7. The Owner must notify and obtain approval from Ecology prior to any use of the o Property that is inconsistent with the terms of this Restrictive Covenant. Ecology may approve any I-r, inconsistent use only after public notice and comment N Section S. The Owner shall allow authorized representatives of Ecology the right to enter the — Property at reasonable times for the purpose of evaluating the Remedial Action,to take samples,to inspect remedial actions conducted at the property,and to inspect records that are related to the Remedial o Action. a Section 9. The Owner of the Property reserves the right under WAC 173-340-440 to record an instrument that provides that this Restrictive Covenant shall no longer limit use of the Property or be of any further force or effect However,such an instrument may be recorded only if Ecology,after public notice and opportunity for comment,concurs. I PUGET ,INC. �' [DATE S SIGNNS )Ej -z►- loo STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 1.0 day of .- -w f 2000,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared.R.B Boyd,to me known to be the person who signed as President of Puget Western,Inc.,the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instnnnent,and acknowledged said instrument to be the fee and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was duly elected,qualified and action as said officer of the corporation,that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the se I1 red,if any,is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN e hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written i `�er.' '41•4. L. •O NOTARr S --� $t. PUBLIC Print Name: Get - n7. t-2, 14, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ki!!too Residing at My commission expires: 45,L/G /4• uo.2 L EXHIBIT"A-3" LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PARCEL 3 All those portions of Revised Parcel "D", City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No.LUA-98-164-LLA,as recorded under Recording No.9812109014,Records of King County, Washington, lying Southerly of the following described line: • COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., • King County, Washington; THENCE South 00°44'46" West along the West line of said Section 20, a distance of 72.43 feet to the Southerly margin of South Grady Way; THENCE CONTINUING South 00° 44' 46" West along the West line of said Section 20, a distance of 572.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 78°26' 19"East,401.04 feet to the Westerly margin of Benson Road South and the terminus of the herein described line. pl 00 \AM GL OD ***et• 9d, x u> 0 of At`Qg i EXPIRESEXpIRES 5/18/pi • Proi.et Nam.: Puget Western.Inc. January 12.2000 RWG/sin 6687L.028 • • . . • . •) . . . .. .. . . . I-405 .. • •••.. .IESicivow. • "CfPN,,,,,,\ • EXPLANATION . . GMW-1• MON1TORING WELL .... ID MANHOLE —I / .6.%•••,........eE'AiSON,0,4 1 il "... •••• ..\,....... GI MI. -6 •GMW-3/3a ..-- 1 / i \ \... C.1 I I . ••-. \ .....'..".\..... 0 T-713 I II • 0 I i J I PARCEL 3 s\ ..,,,E,.....7,::,, .... la ta gir,..N c-.., C..... L •GMW-4/4 7 S1 4 :\N .........\.............. C= r"..`,, me..) ..._... I s..A 0 \ ME-L•NO ai/E 0 Alkik, Cs. ------7.... I auw-e...-44 -- t— am.1"*. elf,41 ‘..... - \.., I. --......—._244..vf-11....3 — i 1 -ALeoT Rcsc . .... , 1..... f/------(; :Cvs./ERcl.N. +NO OircE3 0 --,,_„„,..k.%.1:am, t 20 240 SCskE IN FEET . Et TE LAYOUT - PARCEL 2 Geo.Engteers . - - FIGURE 2 . . V-,.. I. 1,1‘;.:f:.-:•,:, .-....., - .,.,. L iiI:L, .•: ,-.•:13 . . • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO . Puget Western.Inc 19515 North Creek Parkway,Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 20000125901282 \II1II11I1I1III1I KIlI COtJltTYS Yet FIRST ptSRlrxrN COY tI RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Owner. Puget Western,Inc. • Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology . Abbreviated Legal Block 1-2,Walsworth's First Add.To Renton,Vol 6,P 23. Full Legal Description on page(s): 3 Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s):9154600010 k86s 7� Parcel 2-Formerly Part of the Puget srlj"�- Sound Energy Grady Way Complex Property 1ST ABIS 915 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington c.. This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is made pursuant to RCW 70.105D.030(1)(f)and(g) N and WAC 173-340-440 by Puget Western,Inc.(Owner)its successors and assigns,and the State of • Washington Department of Ecology,its successors and assigns(hereafter"Ecology"). An independent remedial action(hereafter"Remedial Action")occurred at the property that is the 'XI subject of this Restrictive Covenant. The Remedial Action conducted at the property is described in the following documents which are on file at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office: • ' 1. Environmental Site Assessment,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,Washington-April 29, 1998. By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/042998. .,''�`� 2 Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,First Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-June 7, 1999.By Geo-Engineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/060799 3. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Second Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-July 22, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0136-407-00-1150/72299. 4. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Third Quarter I999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-December 21, 1999 By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-122199. 5 Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Fourth Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-November 24, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/112499. 6 Supplemental Site Characterization and Site Closure Report,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-December 21, 1999,By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/122199. This Restrictive Covenant is required because the Remedial Action resulted in leaving residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Toxics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater established under WAC 173- 340-740. . The undersigned,Puget Western,Inc,is the fee owner of real property(hereafter"Property")in the County of King,State of Washington,that is subject to this Restrictive Covenant. The Property is commonly known as Parcel 2 of the former Puget Sound Energy Grady Way Complex site(see attached map)and is legally described in exhibit A-2(attached). Puget Western,Inc.,makes the following declaration as to limitations,restrictions,and uses to which the Property may be put and specifies that such declarations shall constitute covenants to run with the land,as provided by law and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them, including all current and future owners of any portion of or interest in the Property(hereafter"Owner"). Section 1. The Property contains residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Toxics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater. During at least one past ground water monitoring event,dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons have been detected in monitoring wells GMW-8,GMW-13,and GMW-14(see attached map),dissolved arsenic has been detected in GMW-8. . •^ Section 2, No groundwater may be taken from the Property for any use • - UJ� +'+n f•-7 r;' Section 3. Any activity on the Property that may interfere with the integrity of the Remedial Action and continued protection of human health and the environment is prohibited. ,Section 4 Any activity on the Property that may result in the release or exposure to the environment of a hazardous substance that remains in ground water beneath the Property as part of the Remedial Action,or create a new exposure pathway,is prohibited without prior written approval from Ecology. Section 5. The Owner of the property must give thirty(30)day advance written notice to Ecology of the Owner's intent to convey any interest in the Property No conveyance of tide,easement, lease,or other interest in the Property shall be consummated by the Owner without adequate and complete provision for continued monitoring,operation and maintenance of the Remedial Action. T+e Owner conveying any interest in the property shall notify Ecology of the name,mailing address and telephone number of the person or persons who acquired the title,easement,lease,or other interest in the Property within fifteen(15)days of the transaction. Section 6. The Owner must restrict leases to uses and activities consistent with the Restrictive Covenant and notify all lessees of the restrictions on the use of the Property Section 7 The Owner must notify and obtain approval from Ecology prior to any use of the Property that is inconsistent with the terms of this Restrictive Covenant. Ecology may approve any inconsistent use only after public notice and comment. Section 8. The Owner shall allow authorized representatives of Ecology the right to enter the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of evaluating the Remedial Action;to take samples,to inspect remedial actions conducted at the property,and to inspect records that are related to the Remedial Action. Section.9. The Owner of the Property reserves the right under WAC 173-340-440 to record an instrument that provides that this Restrictive Covenant shall no longer limit use of the Property or be of any further force or effect. However,such an instrument may be recorded only if Ecology,after public notice and opportunity for comment,concurs. PUg WAESTERN INC. • /‹• A-t o• [DATE SIGNED] 1—).1-).00 Lin STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING a On this .tS'day of To..wr ,2000,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commisloned and sworn,personally appeared R B.Boyd,tome known to be the person who signed as President of Puget Western,Inc.,the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was duly elected,qualified and action as said officer of the corporation,that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed,if any,is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. l t�lulnrrr V110T /4• ��. s'o E F'SOu Print/� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, . Residing at Cl...i To.✓ ▪ o NO1ARy ▪ _41p— My commission expires: I i Q va Z PUBLIC , • EXHIBIT"A-2" • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION , DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PARCEL 2 All those portions of Blocks 1 and 2, including the unnumbered tracts adjoining the lots in Block 1 of Walsworth's First Addition to Renton, according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats at page 23 in King County, Washington, lying Southerly of South Grady Way and • Northeasterly of Talbot Road South; • TOGETHER WITH those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South 8th Avenue vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2850, which attached thereto by operation of law, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington; THENCE South 00° 44' 46"West along the East line of said Section 19, a distance of 72.43 feet to the Southerly margin of said South Grady Way and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right, from which point the radius point bears North 40° 22' 46"West, 3,857.93 feet distant; THENCE Southwesterly along said Southerly margin and the arc of said curve to the right, passing through a central angle of 04°09'58',an arc distance of 280.53 feet to the POINT OF coBEGINNING. tV THENCE CONTINUING along said Southerly margin and the arc of said curve to the right,passing cthrough a central angle of 01° 56' 55", an arc distance of 131.21 feet to a point of reverse L curvature with a 45.00 foot radius curve to the left; THENCE along the arc of said curve, passing through a central angle of 88° 36' 19', an arc distance of 69.59 feet to a point on the Easterly margin of Talbot Road South; THENCE South 32°52' 11"East along said Easterly margin, 147.91 feet to the beginning of a - 0 750.00 foot radius curve to the right; cm THENCE along said Easterly margin and the arc of said curve, passing through a central angle 'r of 13° 16' 16°, an arc distance of 173.72 feet; • THENCE South 89°42' 59°East, 175.14 feet to the East line of said Section 19; THENCE North 00°44'46" East along said East line, 87.43 feet; THENCE North 32° 52' 11"West,393.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Ol 1e;0 • • . 1 , t.AKv • Prolest Name: Puget Western,lne. EXPIRES 5/18/ 0 January 12,2000 • flWG/sm 66871.027 • r' i MAIN AVENUE 5 I-405 emoefty J N. Bw.eery N. NINC STRUCTURE t RESIDENTIK. r_ri_L f I �\\,. CV CO $ERVIC: ^-ENiE�7 r I gzY c jm air .op l �I aoi`i r h Im I i=ic9°t +/— I — "' Li i.— b CV s 1 I STORES BUILDING / ti ` , /6. J ?LOPED lj:\\i '---- ve I CVO iraM,ormer \ \ . \a $laroOe Clock gh MEM, 11•11. J) I II°\ \ ./I \\GMW-9 I ' "'PARCE'L 2 `t1.1-1W . \ \ t+GMw-13 •GMW-14 I • a 12a 2/0 •'' , GMw-e ,V: SWE in 'E31 I locations of all leaturee shaven are approximate. Drawings pravidad by Puget Sound Energy. \ . 1----, • • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Puget Western,Inc. 19515 North Creek Parkway,Suite 310 Bothell,WA 98011 ,'IIF'FrPAGE000 OF 5ee1283 %VC COIRI Y. A FIRST AfERICAfN COO 12 00 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Owner. Puget Western,Inc. Ecology:Washington State Department of Ecology • Abbreviated Legal: Block 1-2,Walsworth's First Add.To Renton,Vol 6,P 23 and Sections 17, 19&20 Township 23 N Range 5 EWN Full Legal Description on page(s). 4 �39.1) / - Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s):2023059007 Parcel I —Formerly Part of the Puget 1ST -s Sound Energy Grady Way Complex Property 915 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington • This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is made pursuant to RCW 70.105D.030(1xf)and(g) and WAC 173-340-440 by Puget Western,Inc.(Owner)its successors and assigns,and the State of • cv Washington Department of Ecology,its successors and assigns(hereafter"Ecology"). o An independent remedial action(hereafter"Remedial Action')occurred at the property that is the e subject of this Restrictive Covenant. The Remedial Action conducted at the property is described in the followingdocuments which are on file at Ecology's ogy's Northwest Regional Office: av o 1. Report of Geotechnical Services,Subsurface Contamination Study,Former Renton Transportation Center,Renton,Washington-July 26, 1988.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-78-4. 2. Report of Remedial Action,Underground Storage Tank Removal,Renton Service Center,Renton, Washington-December 15, 1989. 3. Supplemental Report-GeoEnvironmental Services,Off-site Subsurface Contamination Study, General Stores Building,Renton Service Center,Renton,Washington-November 29, 1990.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-106-B69. 4. Supplemental Report-GeoEnvironmental Services,Subsurface Contamination Study and Ground Water Monitoring Program,General Stores Building,Renton Service Center,Renton,Washington- December 18, 1990.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-106-B69. 5. Report of Geotechnical Services,UST Removal and Subsurface Contamination Study,Stores Building,Renton Service Center,Renton,Washington-January 17, 1990 6. Report of Remedial Action,Underground Storage Tank Removal,Stores Building,Renton Service Center,Renton,Washington-February 7,1991.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-125-B69. 7. Report of Remedial Action and Geotechnical Services,Hydraulic Fluid Remedial Program, Stores Building,Renton Service Center,Renton,Washington-October 4,1991.ByGeoEngineers, No.0186-106-R69, Project 8. Environmental Site Assessment,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,Washington-April 29, 1998. By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/042998. 9. 1998 Site Cleanup Activities,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,Washington(Volumes I and._ • II)-Decembei 23, 1998.By Geo-Engineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150. 10. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,First Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton,f;!.' , . ._ Washington-June 7, 1999.By Geo-Engineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/060799. L........_,.t...,-...-+...--.....may--+aya.tia-nju,.. • 1 1, Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Second Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington-July 22, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/72299. 12. Supplemental Site Characterization and Remedial Activities,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-November I7, 1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150/111799 13. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Third Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-December 21,1999.By GeoEngineers,Project No.0186-407-00-1150\122199. 14. Confirmation Ground Water Sampling,Fourth Quarter 1999,Grady Way Complex Property,Renton, Washington-November 24, 1999.By GeoEngineerte,Project No 0186-407-00-1150/112499. This Restrictive Covenant is required because the Remedial Action resulted in leaving residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Toxics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater established under WAC 173- . 340-740. The undersigned,Puget Western,Inc,is the fee owner of real property(hereafter"Froperty")in the County of King,State of Washington,that is subject to this Restrictive Covenant. The Property is commonly known as Parcel 1 of the former Puget Sound Energy Grady Way Complex site(see attached map)and is legally described in exhibit A-1 (attached), Puget Western,Inc.,makes the following declaration as to limitations,restrictions,and uses to which the Property may be put and specifies that such declarations shall constitute covenants to run with the land,as provided by law and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them, including all current and future owners of any portion of or interest in the Property(hereafter"Owner") section 1. The Property contains residual dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon and arsenic concentrations in groundwater which exceed the Model Toxics Control Act Method A Residential Cleanup Levels for groundwater. During at least one past ground water monitoring event,dissolved C., petroleum hydrocarbons have been detected in monitoring wells GMW-2/2a,GMW-12/12a,and GMW- N 17(see attached map);dissolved arsenic has been detected in MW-4 and GMW-12/12a Section 2, No groundwater may be taken from the Property for any use. o Section 3. Any activity on the Property that may interfere with the integrity of the Remedial rr Action and continued protection of human health and the environment is prohibited Section 4, Any activity on the Property that may result in the release or exposure to the environment of a hazardous substance that remains in ground water beneath the Property as part of the Remedial Action,or create a new exposure pathway,is prohibited without prior written approval from Ecology. Section 5, The Owner of the property must give thirty(30)day advance written notice to Ecology of the Owner's intent to convey any interest in the Property. No conveyance of title,easement, lease,or other interest in the Property shall be consummated by the Owner without adequate and complete provision for continued monitoring,operation and maintenance of the Remedial Action. The Owner conveying any interest in the property shall notify Ecology of the name,mailing address and telephone number of the person or persons who acquired the title,easement,lease,or other interest in the Property within fifteen(IS)days of the transaction. Section 6. The Owner must restrict leases to uses and activities consistent with the Restrictive Covenant and notify all lessees of the restrictions on the use of the Property. Section 7. The Owner must notify and obtain approval from Ecology prior to any use of the Property that is inconsistent with the terms of this Restrictive Covenant Ecology may approve any inconsistent use only after public notice and comment. Section 8. The Owner shall allow authorized representatives of Ecology the right to enter the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of evaluating the Remedial Action;to take samples,to inspect remedial actions conducted at the property,and to inspect records that are related to the Remedial Action. Section 9 The Owner of the Property reserves the right under WAC 173-340-440 to record an • instrument that provides that this Restrictive Covenant shall no longer limit use of the Property or be of any further force or effect. However,such an instrument may be recorded only if Ecology,after public notice and opportunity for comment,concurs. PUle./S. V,II�C. [DATE SIGNED] 1_ �, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this),I IT day of ,2000,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared R.B Boyd,to me • known to be the person who signed as President of Puget Western,Inc,,the corporation that a ecuted the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was duly elected,qualified and action as said officer of the corporation,that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed,if any,is the corporate seal of said corporation IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written /i IA. ER/4- �a; 4 to Lslrty ;aswn F -4 Print Name /.',.rb.r M et-r. u 140T AR), Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, —f— Residing at �..rTp.../ Puatic 6 My commission expires r4u6 i4, Zoy,Z �O�Q rtt tto>t���* N O N N EXHIBIT"A-I" LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PARCEL 1. All those portions of Revised Parcel "D" of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No.LUA-98-164-LLA,as recorded under Recording No.9812109014,Records of King County, Washington,and of Blocks 1 and 2,including the unnumbered tracts adjoining the lots in Block 1 of Walsworth's First Addition to Renton,according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats,at page 23,in King County,Washington,lying Southerly of South Grady Way and Northeasterly of Talbot Road South; TOGETHER WITH those portions of Burnett Avenue South and South 8th Avenue vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2850, which attached thereto by operation of law, more particularly described as follows: • COMMENCING at the Northwest-corner of Section 20,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.; THENCE South 00° 44' 46' West along the West line of said Section 20,a distance of 72.43 feet to the Southerly margin of South Grady Way,the POINT OF BEGINNING,and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, from which point the radius point bears North 40°22' 46" West. 3,857.93 feet distant; THENCE Northeasterly along said Southerly margin and the arc of a curve to the left,passing through a central angle of 03° 14' 06", an arc distance of 217.82 feet; THENCE North 46° 23' 08" East, 75.85 feet; THENCE South 43" 36' 52" East, 100.35 feet; THENCE South 89'59'34"East,93.70 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left from which point the radius point bears North 89° 25'43" East,62.00 feet distant; THENCE Southerly and Easterly along the arc of said curve to the left,passing through a central angle of 83" 12' 13", an arc distance of 90.04 feet; cn THENCE South 83°46' 31" East, 144.23 feet: cco THENCE South 89'59'34"East,97.75 feet to the Westerly margin of Main Avenue South,also known as Benson Road South; THENCE along said Westerly margin the following five courses: THENCE South 01" 28' 24'_West,296.92 feet to the beginning of a 199.18 foot radius curve —_ to the right; THENCE along the arc of said curve, passing through a central angle of 48° 46' 00", an arc distance of 169.53 feet; THENCE South 50° 14'24"West,81.60 feet to the beginning of a 507.46 foot radius curve to the left: THENCE along the arc of said curve, passing through a central angle of 25° 28' 01", an arc distance of 225.57 feet: THENCE South 24°46' 24"West, 29.47 feet; THENCE North 78° 26' 19"West, 401.04 feet to the West line of said Section 20; THENCE North 00° 44' 46" East along said West line, 67.86 feet; THENt:E North 32'52'II"West;393.46 feet to the Southerly margin of said South Grady Way and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left, from which point the radius point bears North 36° 12' 48"West, 3,857.93 feet distant; THENCE Northeasterly along said Southerly margin, along the arc of said curve to the left, passing through a central angle of 04°09'58",an arc distance of 280.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 01 131 rip 1.6;�1p.':;o Oil k N f. . • ..... • 9 -4%4 L LAx1> ^''J EXPIRES 5 f tar p( ' 1 Y \1 • " ��- • ,I I - t • MAIN AVENUE S 1-405 [---,-- Praovrty� 441 Bowwary 1 PNaaNC STRUCTURE I •GMW-15 :: T8 k\4\ • w•n : F 6 ! II rS SEWCE CENTER • '/�,`r ` r C*7 x e I _� BAT j i f W x J •GMw•1 -°- \ PARCEL 1 ffi W .n \ m / GMw•2/2n. , \ Cs.* \ 1----'--1 I O \ I / CZ �+ I STORES 9uILOINC CV O� j r �f° ti \ �� GMW•12/12a• r . vOEvfLOPED \\ . x •M W-8 tronvorn.er V4M 7 No\ \�yI\` Storaor each /// ,\sMW-20 N\ // /1\ • \ • \ :.\ I ��z I. 1 za z•a SCALE in FEET / . ..././...."... ..---T. The locations of all features shown are approximate \ / •nee: Oreeengs provided by Puget Sound Energy \, // J R, 1 F3 • 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 �. + + + + + + + + +� + + + + A«, 4. " ++++++1++ / + (Y- /1L,h-L- - ./., + + + + + + • + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + • + + * + + + + t + + + + + +� + +.+ + +CAS+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + s + + r• -- �t + + + + j + + +_+•--t + + + + + +1+ + + + + • + i +__�—++ + + + + + + + + + + I +f + + !' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +.+ + + + + + + + + + + + ••i:' + + + + + + + ����� +: ++: +++++++++++5++R+ tbn Village Pl. 1P • . + +++++ c ri + + - YS 151St. RNN \ z i _ H - _-00- —_ \_- — ==W- - 1- ._ R'-8f C -CO-----7- 4111 I ri \ tj- - — N -- 7-m IR_g I a) co r — - I- h• th ---I,o w S 19th St—= =R--r$- __ R 8- — I . --1-I '-n- I ' 1 Li i CN R-`8 R I .. I. 1 I-- `T 2 •__.r F R 8 ' CI R-1 T.._¢ , - ---- R-8 /LiLmLft St— /vT! //\ . . , ,� �- — -- — �'8--- - —8_ i `- to / 7 ; -S: 4,4, i R'\ 8 _--T S -2 r-1- St. I _� �� ..L R .. / •. n i n \I �C H3 • 30T23NR5EE1/2 0®o ~ ° :_ ZONING G, c- � 114e00.;. ♦ - • P/8/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES /11141111 lip ,.-.;I=/ y 19 T23N R5E E 1/2 `. uo4+jb 'rr d `��� � *��®� �`` v oY .�� , •,� A` / e}.� "s' 6 ♦ • e • `" , € OPUS:. ` 28�' �, ,� �., ,,��sy'' `"�►� J���� ' y\P> ' • .►r JC• $, South ointe �.' \-t 4� , 'i' .,•� a..,..►j . � . � ► . ,k. Corporate Center �Nr O3/4P1 H"TOH �♦ e44:o�4ti `y0 •tfj, >...?oy®® '�`+�f<'��>.•I ��• G� ..ro A d(`v\,,� Iy y Ho ad 4.�a .\ . \ .lw `t• �y'yK� i c� a 'Ir!� y V `! V` qi;�4� • Renton,WA ,RH a i.••• ,.vr `� �. ,.\`\W�•,. ✓r 4wv. r. ,y 1 S' .V.;: 0 ,(41,44, 4 fl p��\�L•b� v. August 3,2000 1,4* • 1,. 4,.. . _ _ . ..,. iv f 4, -,„,..• 4., 1.4\.....44,,, . \kt*/ ; _1 , -(4))-1 . I 's s .. .( ; -,:" s.,k ,Zi4P'' , 4. 4 40 :,,iitt,' :, rN)? '.f.4., t_to i'% �q .& 3 �' �O r.. �y.• • �;/�/�'` s:/r�srrrseourt 5/5 4 6RADY WAY -` r / ®; % '•,.,k 1 ry.,* .•:'• Y . • a, 'i ik t '••ir 6;,'1.,/t ti.t. 4,jr.o... 7' iikt`t,4tt.,,,,:p 41•4,..'-'. ,,,/ .// / N... , 097e_ ,. . \ v -,•2 / .... /?yam ay e� + +x O o •: V% 9, 0 t`* .,� qO, .. /\ .. \ �¢,C• .\ ;fo 4410, 0,/ . \ �_��pp o p , l'i / • r / itt. dP W. a ! .. , a F ', "Vi .$ q.,, "� ' ' , e tl �i '„ 3 % . i. A .. acr /. Qm •s' 'IWt f � A � ^' • ,� - � !V4 r; , O G� . 6 i/!;� r Qp « \ V •r: f ! LJ / :�•4 V� \ sc'Y '3�'*4 } � A.. 4*.t f# I% 4c1 / /'4rtifrP' ‘ / • ,,,..".. +4 .. e• 4,:44, - .1p , .19.cf?' illtoNljtT Ar4s,- sN. I',•0 ,/ 1----1\ \ l', \1:'1'.,( ‘t.,,.,p- '"';, ' 41 :' ?r%b 8 „.„.., • .1 ,..> 5... .4. , . ...,, . . -1;tc ,. El, \ll ii. c*,...7,. .,,.._ \ • o� �CDC] • '' � \ '♦4014 : � .` „ v ` ,!\ 4i /� r \\� \ / bUNTRy N . .‹� .. . ®� � 9j 0 150 300 600 i� OPUS A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Vicinity Map V410 IQ• December 14, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H LOCATION: 915 S Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct auto sales facility consisting of 53,200 square foot showroom/service building, 506 vehicle display parking, 129 vehicle service/storage parking and 193 customer/employee parking SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 24, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December 1, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,December 1, 1998, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: Building elevations Exhibit No. 6: Stream buffer/wetland drawing . 1 1obert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 • Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant seeks site plan approval and approval of a variance to construct an auto sales facility consisting of a 53,200 square feet showroon/service building,retail display parking for 506 vehicles, 129 parking stalls for vehicle service/storage area and 193 parking stalls for customers and employees. The entire site is approximately 20.19 acres. The present owner has agreed to sell 1.19 acres on the north part of the site to the City of Renton for City Hall parking improvements. The site is currently owned and used by Puget Sound Energy for storage and maintenance of electrical and gas equipment. The three existing buildings on site would be demolished. Soil remediation has been done to the site regarding underground tanks. The primary access into the proposed site would be off Talbot Road with an emergency access off South Grady Way which would be gated. There is a .84 acre Category II wetland at the southeast corner of the site. The eastern portion of the wetland slopes up to Benson Road. There is a concrete drainage channel on the west edge of the wetland that is a tributary of Rolling Hills Creek. The code requires a 25 foot buffer width from the high water mark of creeks. The applicant initially requested a variance as they were providing 19 feet instead of the 25 foot required buffer along the western edge of the stream channel where an access road intruded at various points. After reviewing the matter, it was concluded that no variance was required because of the existing conditions of asphalt and compacted gravel that border the drainage channel,thus requiring no land clearing. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with fire and traffic mitigation fees imposed. The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan(CP) amendment and rezone for this site on October 5, 1998,changing it from Employment Area-Industrial to Employment Area- Commercial,with the rezone from Heavy Industrial and Commercial Office to Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the CP designation which is intended for land uses that require high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. The proposal conforms to the site rezone as automobile sales are a permitted use in the CA zone. Automobile service and repair are also permitted uses. This application meets all setback requirements as the building is located in the center of the site surrounded with large areas of parking. It also meets building height and lot coverage requirements. This site is now in the Automall Area B and the landscape standards require a 15 foot wide landscape perimeter strip along the street frontages, and a minimum 2.5 percent of the gross site area to be provided as onsite landscaping to be focused around building entries and site entries. Applicant is providing approximately 15.8 percent of the gross site area in landscaping,not including the wetland and the embankment up to Benson Road. The existing trees along Talbot Road will be removed. Also included is 7,464_square feet of parking lot landscaping. The code also requires pedestrian connections from street frontages to building entries. The proposal does not include these and staff is recommending that the site plan be revised to accommodate pedestrian connections from South Grady Way and Talbot Road. This proposal will not directly impact the existing Category II wetland. In terms of the buffer,the applicant is providing 25 feet of buffer on the west edge of the wetland in a planted berm. This would separate the drainage channel and the wetland from the access road. Buffer averaging is allowed and the applicant has proposed to make up for the shortfall to the east of the wetland. The concrete drainage channel has water in it year round, but no fish have been observed in it. The site is bounded on the east and south by Interstate 405 with a steep vegetated embankment to Benson Road to the east. To the north is Renton City Hall and office uses are located to the west. The site plan layout is not expected to have an impact on surrounding properties nor would the operation of the facility create adverse • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 • Page 3 impacts on surrounding property or uses. The primary access drive has been located as far to the south on Talbot as possible so as not to interfere with the busy intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Staff recommends site plan approval subject to the following conditions: (1) that applicant comply with the ERC mitigation measures of payment of fire and traffic mitigation fees; (2)that applicant revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. Pat Donnelly, 3050 Main Street,#350,Irvine, CA 92614, applicant representative herein, addressed security issues. He stated that behind the service building where vehicles are kept for service there is a 6 foot masonry wall surround. The rest of the site has an 18 inch high rail fence to prevent cars being driven offsite other than through the appropriate exits. He further detailed Autonation's sales approach and its opposition to pedestrian access to the vehicle display areas. Regarding the industrial waste water system, it discharges into the sanitary system after going through oil-water separator. That includes the service area and the car wash. The car wash has a recycle system. Mark Steepy, 1201 Third Avenue,#900, Seattle, Washington 98101, applicant representative herein, stated that there is a hydraulic connection between the wetland and the stream buffers and it occurs next to Talbot where the stream is in a concrete channel and ends about 20 feet short of Talbot. It then goes into a culvert underneath Talbot. During large storm events water will go out into the wetland. In many locations, but not all, the wetland goes to the concrete channel,so the driveway has been offset 25 feet from the western edge of the wetland. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City or Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055, addressed the issue of traffic at the intersection of Talbot and Grady Way. Because of the type of use of the proposed facility, it is not expected to generate traffic at peak rush hour times. The conflict of left-hand turns into the site and the left-turn lane from Talbot to Grady was studied. It was determined that the proposed access was desirable for this site. If at a later time the turning proposes a problem,the City can require C-curbing to limit access. Mr. Watts further addressed street improvement requirements along Benson Road, Grady Way and Talbot. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:05 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Robert Dwors for Autonation USA,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an automobile sales complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H • December 14, 1998 Page 4 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 915 South Grady Way. The site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of South Grady Way and Talbot Road South. The site is immediately west of the new Renton City Hall and is the site of a Puget Sound Energy complex that will be removed. 6. The subject site consists of a very irregularly shaped parcel that is approximately 1,700 feet long(north to south)by 1,000 feet long. The site and surrounding streets are not quite oriented in a north-south or east-west direction,making some locations a bit ambiguous. The current owner, Puget Sound Energy, proposes selling a 1.30 acre portion at the northeast corner of the site to the City for use by the new City Hall. The remaining parcel, approximately 18.89 acres,will be used for the proposed complex, open space,wetland preservation and hillside protection. 7. The eastern third of the site is dominated by the steep slope located between the subject site and Benson Road South. The site also has an approximately .84 acre Category 2 wetland in the southern end of the site. A stream confined to a concrete channel flows below the steep Benson slopes. 8. The site currently contains a number of buildings which have a footprint of approximately 81,241 square feet and the site is surfaced with a mix of various paving materials and compacted gravel. 9. A portion of the site was part of the original City when it was incorporated in 1901. The remainder of the site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinances 738 and 1547 enacted in March 1925 and May 1956 respectively. 10. The subject site was reclassified Commercial Arterial(CA)with the adoption of Ordinance 4404 in June 1993. As part of the original application,the applicant proposed installing planting adjacent to the creek and LW work within the 25 foot setback area required around creeks. The applicant applied for a variance to allow this restoration work. Staff determined that the variance is only required if vegetation is to be cleared. In this case the creek is surrounded by asphalt and gravel and no vegetation will be removed as there is none in that area. A variance is,therefore,not needed. 12. The applicant proposes developing an approximately 53,200 square foot combined showroom and service building for the sales and servicing of automobiles. There will be a number of associated outdoor facilities including a delivery area,display parking area,a test track and employee and customer parking areas. 13. The building is approximately 350 feet long by 150 feet deep. The long axis of the building will be aligned with Grady Way but is set back from Grady by approximately 250 feet. The building will be set back approximately 300 feet from Talbot. The proposed building is approximately 34 feet tall. The facade will be articulated. The building will be taller at the entrance and have columnar treatments at the corners of the front, south or southwest facade. '1rn, Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 5 14. The proposed building will cover approximately 6 percent of the parcel whereas coverage of 65 percent is allowed. 15. A large part of the complex will consist of parking areas. There will be 506 stalls along the Grady and Talbot frontages for sales display. There will be 129 stalls for service storage located near the northeast corner of the site. To the rear or east side of the site there will be 193 customer and employee parking stalls. 16. There will only be one primary access driveway to the site. The driveway will be located along Talbot. It will enter the site and traverse up the eastern edge of the site, adjacent to the channelized creek. The driveway will permit both left and right turns into and out of the site. It will be approximately 650 feet south of the Grady Way intersection to avoid turning conflicts. Staff and the applicant worked on creating a driveway that would not interfere with either the arterial flow or turning movements. The City would reserve the right to alter access if problems arose. A second gated driveway would provide emergency access along Grady Way. 17. There would be extensive site landscaping that will continue the automall streetscape theme. The theme requires 15 feet of landscaping along Grady and Talbot including a grass berm and red maples at 25 feet on center. Unfortunately this will result in the removal of the existing mature plantings found along Talbot and possibly on other locations on the subject site. The applicant should check to see if its mature plantings may be appropriately substituted in certain aspects of its landscaping plans. The applicant will be providing approximately 15.8 percent landscaping over the site. Plantings are concentrated along the building facades and at entry points to the site. 18. The applicant will be providing a minimum 19 foot stream buffer and a minimum 25 foot wetland buffer. The City regulations require preservation of the .84 acre Category 2 wetland. The applicant will employ wetland buffer averaging to provide additional buffer along the east side of the wetland where the steep slopes prevent development in any event. A bermed wetland buffer will replace paving between the access road and the wetland. The channel in which the creek flows is approximately 3 feet deep and 4 feet wide. The applicant proposes a dense buffer with evergreens and other mass plantings to create a habitat and discourage intrusions. As noted, it will have a minimum width of 19 feet. 19. Surface water will be directed to a biofiltration swale near Grady Way. Contaminated waters will be dumped to the sewer system. The car wash will utilize a water recycling system. 20. The site is designed to accommodate the driving public and staff has recommended that an additional pedestrian link to Grady be provided. 21. In order to provide security,the perimeter of the site along the accessible street frontages will be secured by pipe railing and not by cyclone fencing. 22. The project will generate approximately 1,520 daily vehicle trips. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 6 b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed use is compatible with a variety of goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed site plan preserves the wetland and steep slope and while the creek remains embedded in a concrete channel, enhanced landscaping will improve its appearance. The use itself will create additional employment as called for in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. 3. The proposed building meets the bulk, height and setback requirements of the Building Code. The plan also meets the requirements imposed by the automall overlay in the additional setbacks and landscaping. 4. The proposed use will generate more traffic in the area but staff reports that the traffic can be handled by the street system. The one driveway has been located to avoid interference with intersection turning movements at Grady and Talbot and most of the traffic will be generated during off-peak hours. Other than the traffic and possibly more comings and goings than the current use,there should be minimum impacts on any surrounding uses. 5. As noted,the applicant will be increasing the landscaping found on the site although potentially sacrificing the existing mature plantings now found on the site. The creek corridor will be enhanced, the wetland buffered appropriately and the slope retained in its current state. The building appears well-designed with articulations that should reduce its apparent bulk and the generous setbacks from the street will reduce its visual appearance. The security fencing will be minimally intrusive but reduce the chance of theft. The Grady corridor with its enhanced landscaping should be welcoming to both drivers and pedestrians. The applicant should provide an additional pedestrian connection to the Grady corridor even though the site is automobile oriented. 6. The redevelopment of the site will probably help property values and should increase the overall tax base of the City. 7. Presumably the applicant and staff have determined that only one driveway will be adequate and safe for a complex of this size. The circulation patterns within the site seem safe and adequate with internal signs directing the flow of arrivals. The City always maintains the necessary discretion to limit turning movements into or out of a site if problems arise. • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 7 8. The generally low-rise nature of the building coupled with its location should not impede the entry of light and air to the site. 9. The site is served by City utilities which should have sufficient capacity. • 10. In conclusion,the City determined to extend the automall designation in this direction and the proposed use is an appropriate use given that decision. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with the ERC mitigation measures prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall revise the site plan to provide direct pedestrian connections from the sidewalks along South Grady Way and Talbot Road South to the building entries. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ORDERED THIS 14th day of December, 1998. ve)._„„: FRED J.KA AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Pat Donnelly Mark Steepy 1055 S Grady Way 3050 Main Street,#350 1201 Third Avenue,#900 Renton,WA 98055 Irvine, CA 92614 Seattle, WA 98101 Neil Watts 1055 S Grady WA Renton,WA 98055 !,,, TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of December, 1998 to the following:— Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator South County Journal • • Robert Dwors Autonation USA Corp. • Autonation USA File No.: LUA-98-151,SA-H,V-H December 14, 1998 Page 8 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 28, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. • If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both.the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. n 00 I L4 (9J ,,:: ; TERRA ASSOCIATES Inc. :';1,�1.�et tS,'S�ri \i•t r�'1 i;:i�` ® Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology ".,., and Environmental Earth Sciences • August 5, 2000 • ` ' ri) Project No. T-4749 AUG 0 7 2000 Mr. P. J. Santos. • , PUS NW LLB • Opus Northwest, LLC 915 — 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 BeIlevue,'Washington :98005 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations Southpoint Development Renton;Washington Reference: Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Home Depot Development, Renton, Washington,prepared by GeoEngineers, dated October 15, 1999 • Dear.Mr. Santos: As you are aware, Terra Associates, Inc. has been retained by Opus Northwest, LLC to,provide geotechnical engineering services 'for the subject project. Our services to date 'have included review of the referenced geotechnical report, to determine if the information outlined is relevant and valid for your development, and meeting with your construction personnel to discuss geotechnical design and construction issues. The referenced report was prepared for design and construction of a Home'Depot store. This type of structure is typically a warehouse-type facility with perimeter wall heights equal to a two- to three-story building. In preparing their report, GeoEngineers advanced 19 test borings and excavated 1 test pit on the property. In general, soil conditions encountered consisted of 5 to 15 feet of fill comprised predominantly of coal tailings overlying soft and loose alluvium. The soft alluvium extended to depths of about 30 feet along the eastern portion of the site, increasing to greater than 90 feet to the west. Sandstone bedrock was found underlying the alluvium. Based on the conditions encountered, GeoEngineers recommended supporting the building on pile foundations bearing on the competent sandstone below the alluvium and fill. As we understand, Opus Northwest, LLC is proposing development of the property with two 4-story office structures with associated surface parking,:access roadways and utilities. Building finish,floor elevations,will be at or;slightly above existing grades. In our opinion, geotechnical engineering data available for the site and summarized in the referenced report would .continue,to be valid for your project. We would concur with GeoEngineers' recommendations to support the buildings on pile foundations bearing on the competent sandstone formation underlying the site: ` 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 - Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com M . P. J. Santos • August 5, 2000 . Since the western structure will extend further west than the limits of the current exploration test borings, we recommend drilling additional borings in this area of the site. The purpose of these borings will be to determine if the sandstone formation continues to deepen,to the west, and to provide additional information for evaluating pile foundation alternatives. This data will be included with the existing information in a geotechnical engineering report we will prepare for the project. We trust the information provided is sufficient for your current needs. If'you have any questions or require additional.iinnfocmation„please call. S• c 11.sl, roe:-ice►n r 40- .mil l: `°E ' ''r, Sc. /// .7i ' 7 A:die ;•J fig',le.; :iw;. , a: -re:A aX cc: '�7 Bi11 ie er Opus Northwest, LLC Project No. T-4749 Page No. 2 DRAFT . . ., . ‘201- , . • -_ Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Home Depot Development ,• Renton, Washington • October 15, 1999 . , • For Home Depot, U.S.A. f ( . :-.;; r7z:. I: • GeoEngineers File No. 2401-119-00-1130 f• : DRAFT October 15, 1999 • r < Home Depot,U.S.A. 3800 West Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92868 Attention: Brian Esplen Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Home Depot Development Renton,Washington File No.2401-119-00 We are pleased to submit one copy of our dra report entitled "Geotechnical Engineering A Services, Proposed Home Depot Development, Renton, Washington, for Home Depot U.S.A." Our geotechnical engineering services were completed in general accordance with our proposal dated(A_Iugust 11 1999. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services for this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. .? f:= Yours very truly, • GeoEngineers,Inc. Ls Mary S.Rutherford,P.E. Principal MSRptg p:1001final s1240111900mp.doc One copy submitted ' cc: Greenberg Farrow Architecture(five copies) Attention:Michael Okuma 15101 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Tustin, California 92780 1 i r; I ' CONTENTS . 2 Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 f.;; SCOPE 2 INTRODUCTION 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES 3 xw SITE CONDITIONS 4 SURFACE CONDITIONS 4 EXISTING PSE BUILDINGS 4 La SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 General 4 a . Home Depot Building 5 East Retaining Wall 6 Parking Areas 7 Ek CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 GENERAL 7 ., SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 8 General 8 Site Preparation 9 ' Wet Weather Construction 9 1"1' Structural Fill 10 I;: Permanent Slopes 11 i Temporary Slopes 12 i FOUNDATION SUPPORT 12 General 12 Axial Capacity 13 �.; Downdrag 13 Lateral Capacity 14 _1 Pile Settlement 15 Construction Considerations 15 .E FLOOR SLABS 15 ; PYLON SIGN AND LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS 16 RETAINING WALLS 16 Conventional Retaining Walls 16 EAST SLOPE RETAINING WALL 17 General 17 Soldier Piles 17 ii Lagging 18 Tiebacks 18 Drainage 19 rti LATERAL RESISTANCE 19 a UTILITY EXCAVATIONS '`'`' 20 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 20 1: Asphalt Concrete Pavements ,r,H.' ,H1, 20 PCC Pavements - -- ±�\:=). 21 ENTRIES, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES 'y' _ L _._i21 p r i _ G e o E n g i n e e r s FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 E? 1 CONTENTS (CONTINUED) GROUND WATER AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 22 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 22 Seismicity 22 UBC Design Considerations 22 :i Design Earthquake 22 Y7 Liquefaction Potential and Settlement 23 Mitigation of Liquefaction Induced Settlement 23 FROST PENETRATION 23 k°.1 CORROSIVITY 24 SOIL GASES 24 F.1 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 24 LIMITAT IONS" 24 r FIGURES Figure No. 1 VICINITY MAP 1 :.i SITE PLAN 2 BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP 3 CROSS SECTION A-A' 4 CROSS SECTION B-B' • 5 CROSS SECTION C-C' 6 Y, . EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM 7 C.L APPENDICES Page No. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS A-1 APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure No. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM A-1 KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS A-2 LOG OF BORING A-3...A-21 j LOG OF TEST PIT A-22 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING B-1 1 GENERAL B-1 VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS B-1 • MOISTURE CONTENT B-1 DRY DENSITY B-1 ii SIEVE ANALYSIS B-1 ATTERBERG LIMITS B-2 CORROSION TESTING B-2 APPENDIX B FIGURES Figure No. ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS B-1 2 GeoEngineers FileNo. 2401-I19-00-1130\101599 1!141L 1 • VI r. • REPORT I. . GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED HOME DEPOT DEVELOPMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON _ FOR r' • HOME DEPOT U.S.A. } : Li INTRODUCTION -1 This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed Home Depot development to be located in Renton, Washington. The location of the site and the general configuration of the property are shown on the Vicinity Map and the Site Plan, Figures 1 3 and 2,respectively. ii 99 Our understanding of the project is based on information provided by Greenberg Farrow 0 Architecture including a preliminary site plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc., dated September 9, 1999. We understand that the proposed develo ment will include a Home Depot store situated near the east bounda ry ary of the site. 1 small restaurant site is shown along the west property boundary adjacent to Talbot Road (SR-5I5). The Home Depot store will fl encompass 117,064 square feet with an outdoor garden center of 14,790 square feet. Paved parking areas will primarily be located to the northwest and west of the Home Depot store. Due . to constraints on the east side of the property, a retaining wall is planned east of the access road rear the northeast corner of the Home Depot store and adjacent to Benson Road. f ` We understand that the Home Depot store will be single-story. The exterior walls will either be load bearing concrete or masonry walls with uniformly spaced interior columns; or non-load bearing masonry with uniformly spaced exterior and interior columns. Per the Design Criteria Manual,loads for the Home Depot will be as follows: • Columns- 120 kips . • Load bearing walls-5,000 pounds per lineal foot . • Floor slabs on grade- 650 pounds per square foot maximum live load 1 • Pavement loading - standard duty; 50,000 equivalent axle loads, 10-year design, 3,500 vehicle passes per day,7 days per week • Pavement loading-heavy duty; 220,000 equivalent axle loads, 10-year design,26 semitrailer 1 trucks per day, 7 days per week Based on discussions with the, Structural engineer`\,Barry Levine;)and Associates, we understand that pile foundations should have a 100-ton allowable axial capacity and 20-to 25-kip lateral capacity with 1 inch deflection of the pile head. We understand from the site civil i engineer, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., that the proposed Home Depot floor slab and parking lot elevations will be at or near existing site grades. ii G e o.Engineers I. File No. 2401-119-00-1130\I015599 r SCOPE 1 : INTRODUCTION - . The purpose of our services is to complete a number of shallow and deep borings to explore subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site as a basis for developing geotechnical } recommendations for the proposed development. Our proposed scope of services is presented f • below. Our recommendations are provided in general accordance with The Home Depot Design s Criteria Manual (National Edition), dated February 8, 1999. Specifically, our scope of services . includes the following: 1. Review existing information on subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site, available in our files. 2. Mark and clear all boring locations prior to drilling. A private utility locate service was used to locate and clear the proposed boring locations. 3. Explore the subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site by drilling,ten borings bedrock- in and around the proposed Home Depot building footprint, drilling one boring and excavating one test pit in the vicinity of the proposed east retaining wall, and drilling,eight) shallow borings in the proposed.parking areas and'in the south gravel area. 4. Evaluate the physical and engineering characteristics of the soils based on laboratory tests performed on samples obtained from the explorations. The laboratory tests included moisture Sr, ): content, dry density, plasticity, and particle size determinations. In addition, three corrosivity tests were performed. 5. Provide recommendations for the site in accordance with Part Two, Section VI—"Foundation engineering and site preparation evaluation and recommendations," as outlined in the Design p Criteria Manual. This included the following: • Recommendations for site preparation and grading, including temporary and permanent slopes, shoring requirements, fill placement criteria, suitability of on-site soils for fill, and subgrade preparation. ?.t • Foundation support of the structure and slabs, including appropriate pile types, allowable axial capacities,lateral capacities,and estimated settlement fl • Depth to ground water. • Lateral earth pressures for design of retaining walls and below-grade walls; and recommendations for backfill,compaction and drainage,and lateral resistance values. • Pavement designs for parking, automobile traffic and heavy truck loads, including section thickness and pavement subgrade preparation. • • Recommendations for temporary excavation and temporary protection such as excavation sheeting,underpinning and temporary dewatering systems. • Stability of temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes. • Geotechnical seismic design information, including UBC site coefficient,design acceleration and potential for liquefaction. • Frost penetration depth. G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No. 2401-119-00-113011015599 • s • Analysis of soils to ascertain presence of potentially expansive,deleterious,chemically active or corrosive materials or conditions,or presence of gaseous substances. • Slab-on-grade requirements, including anticipated subgrade modulus and requirements for subgrade preparation,vapor retarders and capillary break layers. r R • Wet weather recommendations,including the effect of weather and/or construction equipment on soil during construction. 6. Prepare a draft report containing our observations, conclusions and recommendations along with the supporting data. Four copies will be submitted to Greenberg Farrow Architecture and one to Home Depot. 7. Finalize the report as necessary to respond to reviewer comments and provide four copies of the report to Home Depot and six copies of the report to Greenberg Farrow Architecture. 8. Review the project plans and specifications for conformance to the geotechnical report. PREVIOUS STUDIES GeoEngineers has performed environmental studies at the site for PSE, which have included numerous shallow borings, monitoring wells and test pits. Most of the available information pertains to shallow subsurface conditions. We have also performed geotechnical evaluations for office buildings to the west of Talbot Road across from the site and for th(xisting Renton City Hall building north of the site. The reports we reviewed included: rn • "Report,Geotechnical Engineering Services, Two Renton Place, Renton, Washington", dated May 9, 1985 • "Report of Geotechnical Engineering Studies, Proposed Office Building, South Grady Way and Main Avenue South,Renton,Washington for E&H nterprises", dated July._3.Q,..1985 • "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Three Renton Place, Renton, Washington for •"1 Renton Village Company",dated April, 1986 • "Report,.Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Village Place North Office Building and Parking Garage,Renton, Washington,for Renton Village Associates" dated February 24, �.:.1992. • "Environmental Site Assessment, Grady Way Complex Property, Renton,Washington for Puget Sound Energy",dated April 29, 1998 • "Report, 1998 Site Cleanup Activities, Grady Way Complex Property, Renton, Washington, Volume I of II for Puget Sound Energy", dated December 23, 1998 The information presented in these reports was reviewed and incorporated into our geotechnical evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the site. • 1 . GeoEngineers 3 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS - The site is bounded by Benson Road South on the east, Renton City Hall on the north, South Grady Way on the northwest, and Talbot Road (SR 515) on the west. The south side of the property is adjacent to an undeveloped area. The site is currently developed and occupied by two Puget Sound Energy (PSE) buildings which were part of their Grady Way Complex. The buildings are abandoned, but some of the utilities are still in service. The portion of the site where the Home Depot building and parking areas are proposed is relatively flat at about Elevation 20 to 22 feet. Most of the areas surrounding the buildings are covered with asphalt concrete pavement with some smaller gravel-surfaced areas. The south side of the property, consists of a large, relatively flat gravel-surfaced area at about Elevation 18 feet. A raised asphalt concrete pavement and concrete loading area, about 3 feet high, is located to the south and west of the existing westernmost PSE building. Benson Road South bounds the east side of the property and is about 30 to 40 feet above the site grades. The existing slope and embankment fill from Benson Road down the to the property is inclined at about 2H:1V(horizontal to vertical) or flatter. A lobe of fill extends into the northeast portion of the site where the northeast corner of the Home Depot store will be'located. The fill lobe is 25 to 30 feet above the site grades and is covered with blackberries, brush and deciduous trees. The west corner of the site is vegetated with blackberries and other brush. Numerous above and underground utilities are located throughout the site, including a 100-foot 3 wide easement for aboveground transmission lines that crosses the site in an east-west direction '" south of the Home Depot store footprint. Fl EXISTING PSE BUILDINGS These existing PSE buildings were constructed using concrete masonry blocks. The �1 buildings are supported on timber piling. Based on a review of selected plan sheets provided by PSE, the timber piles have 7- to 8-inch minimum tip diameters and were designed for 15- to :Yl 20-ton axial capacities. Pile tip elevations were not available. Notes on one of the drawings we reviewed indicated that the piles be driven full length or to refusal. The pile spacing for most of the buildings was not available; however, a portion of the Transfer Center remodel has piles '1 spaced at about 10 feet on center with some two and three pile groups spaced at 3-foot on center. The outside of the buildings showed signs of distress consisting of to 1/2-inch wide cracks in the masonry blocks at various locations. The cracking suggests that the'buildings have likely • settled to some degree. This may indicate that the pile foundations may not have penetrated deeply enough into suitable bearing stratum. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS General We evaluated subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site by drilling a total of 19 borings (B-1 through B-19) and excavating one test pit(TP-1). The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. A description of the exploration program and GeoEngineers 4 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 i ' DRAFT : logs of the explorations are presented in Appendix A. The results of the laboratory testing program is presented in Appendix B. The subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site are described in the following ' paragraphs for three areas of the site; the proposed Home Depot building area, the proposed ., parking areas,and the proposed east retaining wall. : ; Home Depot Building General subsurface soil and ground water conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Home Depot building footprint.werexplored by drilling ten deep borings (B-1 through B-9, and B-11) to depths between about 34.5 and 95.8 feet below the existing ground surface. The subsurface soils within the proposed Home Depot building footprint were highly variable across the building area. The explorations encountered coal tailings and other fill materials overlying alluvial deposits with sandstone bedrock at depth. In general, the sandstone bedrock surface is steeply dipping to the west across the building footprint, which coincides with an increasing thickness of the alluvium. The estimated elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock is shown on Figure 3 and on the three cross sections drawn through the building area in Figures 4 through 6. The general soil units and ground water conditions are described below. Existing Pavement. The existing pavement section in the building area consists of about 2 to 5 inches of asphalt concrete over 3 to 12 inches of base course consisting of medium dense gravel with sand and a trace of silt. r Coal Tailings. Coal tailings consistingof black coal mixed with zones of silty sand is g • g sandstone spoils have been deposited across much of the building site. The coal tailings were apparently mined from the hill to the east and deposited downslope on the property. Coal tailings • were encountered in all the borings located in and around the building footprint„except B-11> The coal tailings encountered in the borings are generailj.6 toy•10 feet thick�and were deposited directly over native alluvial soils. Up tc(14 feet of coal tailor were encountered ill B-elocated • near the southwest building corner. The coal tailings were generally very soft to soft with blow counts(N-value)in the range of 1 to 6,with typical values around 2 to 3. The northeast corner of the Home Depot building is located in an area where a large vegetated lobe extends west from the Benson Road embankment. This lobe extends from about L .Elevation 24.feet..up to about Elevation 59feet at its maximum height. Observations indicate that the lobe consists primarily o coal tailings} Test pit,T'P-1*as excavated at the top of the lobe near the location of the,proposed retaining wall. Black coal tailings were encountered to the full-,.a depth of the test pit615 feet. Alluvium. Alluvial soils were encountered in all of the-borings and the thickness of the j alluvium varied considerably from east to west across the site. The alluvium generally consists of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, clay and peat, and very loose to medium dense silty GeoEngineers 5 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\I015599 sand, sand,and gravel deposits. The thickness and location of the organic silt and peat deposits is highly variable. Up to 11 feet of organic silt and peat was encountered in B-2 located on the east side of the building. (Layers bf peaf\,ieposits were encountered ars deep as 63 feet below the ground surface as observed in B-8. Figures 4 through 6 present east-west cross sections of the subsurface profile through the building footprint. The locations of the cross sections are shown on Figures 3. Along the eastern edge of the building alluvium was encountered to about 28, 32 and 34 feet below the ground surface in B-1, B-2 and B-4, respectively. Along the western side of the building alluvium was encountered to about 68, 80 and 91 feet below the ground surface in B-11, B-3 and B-8, respectively. Sandstone Bedrock. Bedrock consisting of sandstone was encountered at depth in all of the deep borings drilled at the site. The "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington" by D.R. Mullineaux, dated 1965, identifies this as an arkosic sandstone that is part of the Renton Formation. This sandstone formation is a source of coal. The sandstone surface under the site dips steeply to the west. A bedrock elevation map 4A (Figure 3)was developed based on the depth to competent sandstone encountered in the borings and on the elevations taken from the preliminary survey map by Barghausen Consulting • Engineers Inc., dated September 15, 1999. The bedrock contours shown on Figure 3 are approximate elevations of the competent sandstone. A zone of weathered sandstone 10 feet thick and 5 feet thick was encountered in B-11 and B-5, respectively, above the competent sandstone bedrock. The weathered surface of the sandstone appears to increase in thickness from east to west across the building footprint. Ground Water. Ground water was encountered in all of the borings at depths ranging from 5 to 14 feet below the ground surface. Ground water levels are expected to fluctuate as a function of season,precipitation and other factors. Ground water measurements performed for some of the l PSE studies indicate that the ground water surface can be up to about 2 feet below the existing ground surface on the eastern portion of the site. East Retaining Wall Subsurface soil and ground water conditions in the vicinity of the proposed retaining wall on the northeast side of the Home Depot building were explored by drilling one deep boring (B-12) A and excavating one test pit(TP-1). Boring B-12 was drilled to a depth of 33.5 feet below the ground surface and was terminated due to refusal in the very dense sandstone. Subsurface conditions encountered in B-12 consisted of about 8 feet of loose silty sand fill over about 9 feet of soft/loose coal tailings. The sandstone formation was encountered at about 17 feet below the ground surface. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DRAFT Test pit TP-1 was excavated to a depth of about 15 feet below the ground surface near the top of the knob extending out from the Benson Road embankment. Loose, relatively dry, black coal tailings and sandstone spoils were encountered for the full depth of the test pit. No ground water was encountered in B-12 or TP-1, but a thin moist to wet layer was observed in B-12 at a depth of about 10.5 feet. This may be a zone where ground water seepage •i.� is present. '. Parking Areas Eight additional shallow borings gh g (B-10, and B-13 through B-19)were drilled in the proposed parking areas and in the gravel area south of the proposed building. The borings were completed to 11.5 feet below the ground surface. The borings in the parking areas encountered asphalt concrete, base course, coal tailings, and alluvium. The.pavement and soils are similar to those described above for the Home Depot building area. The coal tailings encountered in the southwest parking areas (B-16, B-17, and B-18) extended deeper than 11.5 feet (the depth explored). Boring B-10 drilled in the south parking lot encountered about a 9.5-foot thickness of coal tailings over alluvium. Borings B-14 and B-15 drilled on the north side of the west parking lot encountered about a 6-foot thickness of T' coal tailings over alluvium: Boring B-13 was drilled in the parking area to the north of the building and encountered coal tailings about 10-feet thick over alluvium. During drilling, a strong petroleum odor was detected, and a sheen on the water used to clean the sampler was observed. Ground water was encountered in all of the borings, except B-18 and B-19, at depths ranging from about 10 to 10.5 feet below the ground surface. No ground water was encountered in B-18 �= and B-19. Ground water levels are expected to fluctuate as a function of season,precipitation and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our subsurface exploration program and subsurface conditions observed in explorations completed for previous studies, it is our opinion that the siteis suitable) for the proposed Home Depot development; however(pile foundation will be necessary to? adequately support the building. A summary of primary goetechnical+ considerations for the proposed development is provided below. The summary is presented for introductory purposes only and should be used in conjunction with the complete recommendations presented in this report. • The proposed Home Depot building should be supported on pile foundations extending down to the competent sandstone bedrock. We recommend thafi8-inch auger cast p es)be used to achieve an axial pile capacity of 100 tons. • . Slabs for the Home Depot building should include a methane as:ventilation system. Conceptually, this system should consist of a layer of coarse sand or gravel, a vapor barrier slatJu`�'�- L � :�' I. j G e o E.n g i n e e r s ) 7 File No. 2401-119?OO-113011015599 rl and perforated PVC pipes. The sand and gravel layer will also serve as a capillary break i . layer under the slab. • Existing near surface soils immediately below the pavement and base course materials consist - ! of coal tailings. These soils are typically very moist and well above the optimum moisture content and will be difficult to impossible to work and compact. Further, the tailings will break down under mechanical action of earth moving equipment and become softened if exposed to water. Therefore, we recommend that excavation into the tailings be avoided'', wherever possible. F'- • The alluvium under the site has a high susceptibility to settlement under additional loads due to the presence of organic soils. We estimate that more than 1-foot of total primary settlement could occur under the planned building loads. Additional settlement would also occur due to secondary consolidation of these soils over time. • The alluvium underlying the site has a high risk of liquefaction for the design earthquake. E We estimate that 4 to 8 inches of total settlement may occur at the site due to liquefaction resulting from the design earthquake. • The east retaining wall is located in an area where cuts up to 30 feet high will be required to achieve the pro osed site grades. The cut will encounter a significant amount of coal tailings. Further,the,waI1; ill be aboute. 0 feet high,at the north end where it is very close (about 12 feet) from the Benson Road right-of-way. Due to the site constraints in this area, the wall will require special design considerations that may include a very high cantilevered wall with the soldier piles socketed into competent sandstone. The site constraints, the possibility of using permanent tiebacks that would extend into the Benson Road right-of-way, or socketed soldier piles need further evaluation. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK T, General Detailed information regarding proposed finished grades for the planned development were not available when we prepared our report. However, based on preliminary discussions with Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc., we understand that fmished grades for the building and fJ parking areas will be at or near existing site grades,Elevation 20 to 22 feet. In order to minimize post construction settlement, any filling that may be required to achieve planned site grades should be done at the onset of the construction activity. Final grading and paving should be delayed as long as possible so that the majority of the settlement is complete. Most of the site is covered with 2 to 5 inches of asphalt concrete pavement and up to 12 inches of base course material. We recommend that the'asphalt concrete and base cours materials remain in place wherever possible to provide adequate support for construction equipment. Where it is necessary to remove the asphalt concrete and/or base materials to achieve grade,the exposed soils will likely consist of coal tailings that are susceptible to disturbance from construction equipment due to their low strength and high moisture content. We expect that operation of equipment across these soils, especially during periods of wet weather, will be very G e o E n g i n e e rs 8 File No. 2401-119-00-I130\1015599 1)KAr 1 • difficult and will likely result in disturbance of the exposed soils. Where cuts are planned in the coal tailings, it will be necessary to overexcavate about. 1 to 2 feet of the coal tailings, place a woven geotextile separator (Mirafi 500X or equal) over the exposed soils, and backfill to the desired grade with quarry spaii crushed rock,recycled concrete, or a gravel/sand pit run material 1.:, to provide a firm surface to support construction equipment. Site preparation procedures for dry weather and wet weather conditions are discussed in the following sections. `v. l Site Preparation • The trees and vegetation should be cleared and grubbed and the surficial topsoil and vegetative root mass be stripped and removed from the building, pavement, and retaining wall 3 areas. Based on our explorations, we anticipate that the stripping depth on the lobe and in the west corner of the property will generally be about 6 to 1.2 inches. Following stripping, we recommend that the exposed subgrade soils in the building and pavement areas be thoroughly proofrolled with heavily loaded construction equipment if site preparation is done during extended dry weather conditions. Soft or otherwise unsuitable areas revealed during proofrolling that cannot be compacted to a stable and uniformly firm condition must be either scarified, aerated and recompacted, or overexcavated and replaced with structural fill compacted to the recommended compaction criteria presented subsequently. The depth to which soils must be scarified, recompacted, removed and/or replaced should be evaluated by a representative from GeoEngineers. = We recommend that as much of the existing asphalt concrete and base course be left in place • as possible to provide support for construction equipment, provided that it does not interfere with { r installation of piles"and utilities. After demolition of the existing buildings and structures the debris should be removed from the site. The existing buildings are supported on timber pile foundations. It will be necessary to remove`pile and cut off existing piles that interfere with rS the planned Home Depot improvements or foundation elements. We recommend that the existing piles be cut off at least 2 feet below the bottom of new pile caps within the Home Depot building footprint and parking areas to reduce the potential for developing "bumps" as settlement of the a3 subsurface soils occurs. Existing utilities that will be abandoned can be left in-place provided that pipes larger than • 4 inches in diameter be grouted full to prevent potential collapse or migration of water. Existing voids (i.e. manholes or vaults) or new depressions created during site preparation should be cleaned of loose soil or debris and backfilled with structural fill or control density fill (CDF). Wet Weather Construction If site preparation is done during wet weather, earthwork and construction operations should be planned to reduce the exposure of subgrade areas to wet weather and construction traffic. During wet weather topsoil and root mass should be stripped with lightweight equipment and construction traffic should be kept off the exposed areas. • • GcoEn ineers 9 "' g File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 The exposed subgrade should be evaluated by a representative from GeoEngineers who will probe the exposed area to identify areas of soft or yielding soils that should be replaced. These soft areas should be overexcavated to the depth recommended by the geotechnical engineer. l • Upon the recommendation of the geotechnical engineer, the contractor should be prepared to place a'.woven fa&i >such as Mirafi;500 or other fabric with similar properties to provide separation between the exposed soils and the structural fill as well as some stabilization. Other wet weather considerations are as follows: • The storm drainage system should be installed early in the sequence of earthwork activities to provide a means of removing surface water. • Structural fill consisting of a thickness of at least 12 inches of free draining sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines by weight of the 3/4-inch minus material and a layer of • geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X will be required in building slab and pavement areas, where, the pavement is not left in place. The on-site soils including the coal tailings and alluvium are fine-grained and will not meet the free-draining criterion. Alternatively, the upper 12 inches of subgrade material may be treated with cement provided that this is acceptable with the City of Renton. • On-site fill, coal tailings and most of the native alluvium in utility trenches will not be suitable for reuse as structural fill in the trenches. We recommend that free draining trench backfill material should be included in the budget. • Haul routes and material layout areas planned over the exposed coal tailings or alluvium should be constructed consisting of at least 18 inches of clean sand and gravel, crushed rock, ballast or quarry spalls and a layer of geotextile fabric. Alternatively, a 4-to 6-inch thickness of ATB (asphalt treated base) may be placed to protect subgrades where construction traffic J 1 will operate. If wet weather construction is expected, we recommend that Home Depot develop a plan to incorporate wet weather considerations into the project plans,specifications, schedule and budget. Structural Fill General. Fill in building and pavement areas should be placed and compacted as structural fill. If overexcavation of unsuitable soils beneath parking areas or slabs is necessary, we recommend that structural fill be placed and be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD obtained in general accordance with the ASTM D 1557 test procedure. Structural fill placed within the Home Depot building area and within 2 feet of pavement subgrade elevation should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the same criterion. Structural :•a fill placed more than 2 feet below pavement subgrade elevation should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD obtained in accordance with ASTM D 1557. These recommendations apply to utility trench backfill in these areas as well. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal layers of an appropriate thickness to achieve the required compaction. The lift thickness will be a function of the type of soil being placed and the GeoEngineers 10 FileNo. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 1. compaction equipment being used. Each lift should be uniformly compacted to the required compaction level before placing additional lifts of structural fill. We recommend that the appropriate lift thickness, the adequacy of subgrade preparation and structural fill compaction be evaluated during construction by a representative of GeoEngineers. For planning purposes, we recommend that each lift not exceed 8 inches in loose thickness. During structural fill placement t-- and compaction, a sufficient number of in-place density tests should be performed to verify that the required compaction is being achieved. Structural fill material should be free of debris, organic matter and deleterious material. We recommend that the maximum particle size be limited to about 3 inches. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines in the soil matrix increases, the soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes moisture content and achieving the required compaction becomes more difficult or impossible. Suitability of On-Site Soil. The existing near-surface soils consist of gravel base course and coal tailings. The base course material will be suitable for reuse as structural fill, provided it is separated from the coal tailings. We do not recommend using coal tailings as structural fill. The native alluvium consists primarily of fine-grained soils. The moisture in these soils are likely well above the optimum moisture content and will be difficult to use as structural fill, except when aerated in dry weather conditions. iX i. Import Fill. We recommend that imported fill placed within the building and pavement areas consist of material with less than 15 percent fines. If the material is too wet to adequately compact when it is delivered to the site, it will be necessary to aerate it prior to placement. During wet weather or where structural fill is placed on a wet subgrade, we recommend that • import fill consist of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. Requirements for other import fill materials, such as capillary break and crushed base, are 7-5 provided in other sections of this report. We recommend that samples of all import materials be submitted to GeoEngineers for approval prior to beginning the earthwork. Recycled Asphalt Concrete and PCC. The on-site concrete and asphalt concrete may be crushed and re-used on-site for structural fill. The gradation of the crushed recycled material should be consistent with the recommendations provided for imported structural fill materials. Permanent Slopes We recommend that permanent cut and fill slopes be inclined no steeper than 2.5H:1V in the coal tailings and existing loose fill soils along the east slope. Fill slopes should be adequately compacted on the slope face using a hoe pack or plate compactor. Alternatively, the fill embankment can be over-built and cut back to the design location. ' �"'l•' llfl'_•I� is r? GeoEngineers 11 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599.4s; • To reduce the potential for erosion, newly constructed slopes should be vegetated as soon as possible following completion of grading. Temporary erosion control measures such as jute fabric or a biodegradable matting should be used to protect unvegetated slopes from erosion and - ravelling. Where coal tailings are encountered along the east slope, it may be necessary to place a layer of topsoil over the coal to promote vegetative growth. The requirements for topsoil should be evaluated by a landscape architect based on planned vegetation for the slopes. 7 Temporary Slopes Temporary cut slopes should be inclined no steeper than 1.5H:1V in the coal tailings and loose fill soils along the east slope. Surface loads should be kept a minimum distance of at least one half the height of the cut away from the top of the temporary slope. Temporary cut slopes and shoring must comply with the provisions of Title 296 WAC, Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." .The contractor performing the earthwork should have the primary responsibility for establishing the safe inclination for temporary cut slopes, shoring requirements, protection of site personnel and protection of adjacent improvements. FOUNDATION SUPPORT General . • We have considered the use of both spread footings and pile foundations for support of the proposed building. The results of our field explorations, laboratory testing and engineering analyses indicate that spread footings could experience very large total and differential • settlements under the planned building loads. In addition, we estimate that seismic induced liquefaction may also results in up to 8 inches of settlement from the design earthquake. Therefore,we recommend that the proposed building be supported orLpile founda of s. The piles should penetrate into the competent sandstone bedrock encountered at depths ranging from about 10 to 85 feet below the existing ground surface. The estimated elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock surface is shown onFi ure 3. . ; We anticipate that f 8-inch diameter augercast piles will be best suited for this project because of(1) cost, (2) the highly variable depth to competent sandstone, (3) layers of medium dense to very dense gravel within the alluvium that could create driving difficulties for driven pipe or precast piles,and(4)the corrosion potential of the subsurface soils. Design and installation of the pile foundations must take into account the Iocations of the existing timber piles supporting the existing PSE buildings. The existing timber piles may interfere with planned augercast pile locations. The existing timber pile locations should be verified during demolition of the PSE buildings and the Home Depot foundation design and layout modified as required. p G e o E n g i n e e r s 12 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 Axial Capacity ... Axial pile capacity in compression will be developed primarily from end bearing in the • competent sandstone bedrock. We recommend a downward allowable axial capacity of 100 tons ^ per pile for 18-inch-diameter augercast piles. This capacity is for piles that are installed to practical refusal into competent sandstone bedrock, as discussed under "Construction Considerations." We estimate that the piles will encounter practical refusal after penetrating about 1 to 3 feet into the competent sandstone bedrock. A contour map showing our interpretation of the elevation of the competent sandstone bedrock surface is presented in Figure 3. Uplift pile capacity will be dependant on several factors includingthe potential loss of strength of the overburden soils as a result of liquefaction during an earthquake,the thickness of r the overburden soils over the sandstone bedrock, and the embedment depth of the piles into the sandstone bedrock. The allowable uplift axial capacities for different pile tip elevations are 3 presented below. Pile Tip Elevation Allowable Uplift Capacity (feet) (tons) 10 to-25 2 -25 to-35 10 -35 to-45 20 -45 to-65 40 The allowable capacities presented above are for combined dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as seismic forces. The allowable capacities are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and include a factor of safety of at least 2. The capacities apply to single • piles. If piles within groups are spaced at least three pile diameters on center, no reduction for pile group action need be made. The structural characteristics of pile materials and structural connections may impose .:� limitations on pile capacities and should be evaluated by the structural engineer. For example, steel reinforcing will be needed for augercast piles subjected to uplift. We recommend that a single reinforcing bar be installed the entire Iength of the augercast pile to develop the allowable uplift capacities presented above. Downdrag Pile downdrag forces develop when surrounding compressible soils settle relative to a pile, thus interacting with and adding load to the pile. We anticipate that only minor filling, if any, will be required for the project and that no other major sources of surface loading will result from 4 project construction. Consequently, the potential for pile downdrag is expected to be minimal and downdrag need not be considered in the design. , GeoEngineers 13 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 Lateral Capacity Lateral foundation loads can be resisted by the lateral capacity of vertical piles and by the passive soil pressures developed adjacent to pile caps and structurally connected grade beams, if applicable. Because of the potential for separation to occur between the pile-supported foundation components and the underlying soil from liquefaction settlement, base friction on pile ! " caps and grade beams should not be included when estimating lateral capacity. The magnitude of lateral loads and bending moments that develop in laterally loaded piles depends on the pile head deflection, pile stiffness, surrounding soil properties, and the degree of fixity at the pile cap. Allowable lateral load capacities and pile bending moments for both free and fixed headed conditions were estimated using the COM 624 lateral pile capacity analysis program for 1/2-inch and 1-inch pile head deflections are presented below. Pile Head Deflection Allowable Lateral Maximum Bending Pile Head Fixity (inches) Load Capacity(kips) Moment(kip-feet) Free headed 0.5 5 26 1 8• 55 Fixed headed 0.5 14 90 1 22 165. These lateral capacities assume a center-to-center spacing of at least three pile diameters. For free headed pile conditions,the maximum bending moment will occur approximately 8 to 10 feet below the top of the pile and the bending moment will diminish with depth. We recommend that reinforcing be extended from the top of the piles to a minimum depth of 28 feet below the top of the piles for free headed pile conditions. For fixed headed pile conditions,the maximum moment ' occurs at the ground surface. We recommend that reinforcing extend from the top of the piles to ' __ a minimum depth of 31 feet below the top,of the piles for piles designed for fixed headed conditions. Lateral loads and base shear forces transmitted to the building footings can also be resisted by passive resistance on the sides of the pile caps or other below-grade elements. The passive 3 resistance magnitude depends on the soil conditions surrounding the below-grade elements. For elements surrounded by coal tailings, we recommend the passive pressure be estimated based on an equivalent fluid density of..150 pcf(pounds per cubic foot). For elements surrounded by compacted structural fill, an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf may be used for design. The structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent(ASTM D 1557)for a horizontal distance of at least two times the depth from the adjacent ground surface to the bottom of the element. } The above values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Base friction on below-grade elements should be ignored since these will be pile supported and full contact with the underlying soil cannot be assured. } ' 1 • GeoEngineers 14 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\I015599 Lori Pile Settlement We estimate that settlement of the augercast pile foundations, designed and installed as recommended, will be less than 1/2 inch. Maximum differential settlement should be less than 1/4 inch,measured over approximately 50 feet. • Construction Considerations The augercast piles should be installed to practical refusal into competent (very dense) sandstone bedrock using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger. For this pile type, practical k : refusal should be defined as no advancement into the sandstone for two minutes of continuous drilling. As is common practice, the pile grout must be pumped under pressure through the hollow stem as the auger is withdrawn. Reinforcing steel for bending and uplift is placed in the fresh grout column immediately after withdrawal of the auger. We recommend that there be a waiting period of at Ieast 8 hours between the installation of piles spaced closer than 8 feet, center-to-center. This waiting period is necessary to avoid disturbing the curing concrete in the previously cast pile. We recommend that a provision be made in the project plans and specifications to withdraw the auger from some of the piles after the bearing stratum has been encountered to confirm that sandstone bedrock is present at the pile tip. Specifically, we recommend that the auger be withdrawn from 10 percent of the piles to make this determination. The piles from which the auger is withdrawn should be selected by the engineer during construction. It should be noted that no direct information regarding the capacity of augercast piles (e.g., • driving resistance data) can be observed while this type of pile is being installed. Therefore, we • recommend that a representative of GeoEngineers monitor pile installation operations. Our representative will observe the drilling operations, evaluate when bedrock has been penetrated, monitor grout injection procedures,record the volume of grout placed in each pile relative to the calculated volume of the hole,and evaluate the adequacy of individual pile installations. FLOOR SLABS We recommend that the floor slabs for the Home Depot building be pile supported due to anticipated total and differential settlement under static and seismic loading. The exposed slab subgrade should be prepared according to our recommendations in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section and newly placed structural fill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations in the same section. Since the slab will be pile-supported, the slab subgrade need only be prepared to facilitate construction. Therefore, no special requirements for soft soil removal and/or compaction below the slab are required other than to facilitate construction. We recommend that floor slabs be underlain by a layer of capillary break material at least 4.inches thick to reduce the potential for moisture migration into the slab. The methane gas layer (see Soil Gases)will serve as the capillary break layer. GeoEngineers• 1. 15 File No. 2401-I19-00-1130\1015599 A vapor retarder is not normally considered necessary within the Home Depot building area since no floor tiles or carpeting will be used in the building. However, we recommend that a vapor barrier be used for methane gas.piotection(see Soil Gases) Therefore,we recommend that a vapor barrier consisting of a layer of polyethylene sheeting overlain with at least 2 inches of fine to medium sand with less than 3 percent fines be placed immediately beneath the slab. i We recommend that the subgrade for on-grade slabs for the truck loading area and the lumber storage area consist of at least 2 feet of structural fill compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). The modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 kips per square foot per foot (kcf) be used for design of on-grade slabs for the truck loading area and lumber storage area. PYLON SIGN AND LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS Pylon sign and light pole foundations for Home Depot developments are typically supported on drilled shaft foundations. Specific locations and load information for the pylon sign and light poles were not available for this draft report. Based on the subsurface conditions and previous recommendations that the building be pile supported on augercast piles,we anticipate that the pylon signs and light poles can also be supported on auger cast piles. Pile lengths should be evaluated when location and load information become available. th RETAINING WALLS 4 Conventional Retaining Walls We recommend that walls for loading docks or other building walls that will serve as retaining walls be designed for lateral pressures based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf provided that the walls will not be restrained against rotation when backfill is placed. If the walls will be restrained from rotation, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf. These lateral • soil pressures assume that the ground surface behind the wall is horizontal and does not include the •" effects of surcharges such as floor loads, traffic loads or other surface loading. Surcharge effects should be included as appropriate. yj Measures should be taken to prevent overcompaction of the backfill behind the wall. This can be done by placing the zone of backfill located within 5 feet of the wall in lifts not exceeding about 6 inches in loose thickness and compacting this zone with hand-operated equipment such as a vibrating plate compactor or jumping jack. 09 The recommended equivalent fluid densities assume a free-draining condition behind the wall. This may be achieved by placing a zone of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines at least 18 inches wide against the wall. Weep holes at about 4-foot centers at the base of the wall should be sufficient to drain water from exterior walls. Alternatively, perforated drainpipe could be embedded in the free-draining sand and gravel zone along the base of retaining walls to remove water that collects in this zone. A perforated pipe should be provided at the base of fill placed against the outside of the perimeter building walls. The drainpipe should be tightlined to the storm drainage system. G e o E n g i n e e r s 16 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 0 Y ; Yltlli'A n: EAST SLOPE RETAINING WALL General A cut up to 30-feet high is planned for the construction of the access route along the east and northeast sides of the Home Depot building. Based on the soils encountered in B-12 and TP-1 we anticipate that the cut will be primarily in loose fill soil and coal tailings. At the northeast corner of the wall, we anticipate that very dense sandstone up to about 10 feet thick will be encountered at the base of the cut. The contractor should be prepared for hard excavating conditions in the competent sandstone. We have evaluated the use of several different permanent wall types for this area. A soil nail wall, sheet pile wall, and a cast-in-place cantilever wall with a temporary excavation are not appropriate in these soil conditions and/or with the property line restrictions. Based on our evaluation, it is our opinion that a permanent soldier pile and tieback wall is the most appropriate wall type. However, even a tieback wall has significant design challenges with respect to the height of the wall and the proximity of the wall to the Benson Road South right-of-way. Typically, cantilever soldier pile walls are restricted to about 15 to 20 feet in height before anchors are needed for support. We anticipate the wall will be about 30 feet high at the northeast 11 corner. Typically, a single row of permanent tiebacks would be used for a wall of this height. J However, the right-of-way will likely restrict the use of permanent anchors in this area because anchors would extend beyond the property line in the vicinity of the northeast corner of the wall. The soldier piles would likely be quite large for a cantilever wall of this height. We anticipate that it will be necessary to core drill the sandstone to achieve proper pile embedment depths. It may be appropriate to regrade as much of the slope as possible below Benson Road to { decrease the design height of the wall. However, the northeast corner of the wall may still be up to 25 to 30 feet high. Therefore, we anticipate that a portion of the wall may have to be constructed using temporary anchors to support the cut and then constructing a cantilevered concrete retaining wall that is integral with the soldier pile wall. Soldier Piles We recommend that the soldier pile wall be designed using the earth pressure diagrams presented in Figure`7. If the 'soldier pile wall is provided with a permanent drainage system behind the wall, then hydrostatic pressures do not need to be included in the wall design. is Recommendations for permanent drainage are provided later in this section. 4.4 We recommend that the embedded portion of the soldier piles for a cantilevered wall extend to the depth required for the design pressures or a minimum depth of 7 feet into competent(very dense) sandstone below the base of the excavation, whichever is greater. As previously discussed, we anticipate that the sandstone will be encountered about 5 to 10 feet above the base of the excavation in the northeast corner of the wall. We also expect that he sandstone surface will drop to the south and may be about 15 to 20 feet below the bottom of the excavation at the south end of the wall. G e.o E n g i n e e r s 17 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 1JKAI 1 k The axial capacity of the soldier pile must be capable of resisting downward components of anchor loads and other vertical loads. We recommend using an allowable end-bearing value of 50 kips per square foot (ksf) for piles embedded in competent sandstone. The allowable end bearing value should be applied to the base area of the drilled hole into which the soldier pile is ' concreted. This value includes a factor of safety of at least 3. The allowable capacity may be increased by one-third for short-term loads,such as seismic forces. Seismic pressures should be included in design of the wall as it will be a permanent shoring system. Traffic surcharge from Benson Road should be included in the wall design, if needed. 1 Casing may be required to install the soldier piles due to the presence of loose fill soils and coal tailings. Ground water may be encountered on the south end of the wall where the sandstone surface is expected 15 to 20 feet below the excavation bottom and saturated coal tailings and/or alluvium may be encountered above the sandstone in this area. The need for and the use of casing for installation of the soldier piles should be determined by the shoring contractor based on the subsurface conditions presented in this report. The contractor should be prepared to encounter sandstone fragments or metal or wood debris in the fill and/or coal tailings. Lagging We recommend that the lagging be designed for uniform pressures equal to one-half the active lateral pressure (Figure 7). This pressure reduction is based on a maximum center-to- center pile spacing of 8 feet. If a wider spacing is desired, we should be consulted for revised lagging pressures. .Permanent lagging should be installed between the soldier piles to retain the soils where the ` r wall will be used as a permanent retaining structure. Permanent lagging may consist of timber or concrete. If timber is used, it must be adequately treated for protection against water and t • biodegradation. { • Tiebacks BTieback anchors should extend far enough behind the wall to develop anchorage beyond the "no-load" zone and within a stable soil mass. As a minimum,the anchors should extend at least 10 feet beyond the no-load zone into competent sandstone bedrock. The "no-load"zone includes the area where fill and coal tailings are present. Typically, anchors are inclined downward at 15 to 30 degrees below the horizontal. It may be necessary to incline permanent anchors more steeply to penetrate the sandstone where property line restrictions occur or where the sandstone is at lower elevations. We recommend a maximum anchor inclination of 45 degrees below the horizontal. Permanent tieback anchors should be double-corrosion protected. We recommend that the tieback anchors be designed and constructed in general accordance with the criteria presented in the following documents: 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Permanent Ground Anchors,"Report FHWA-DP-68-1R, 1984. GeoEngineers 18 File No. 2401-119-00-1I30\1015599 • `-i 2. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Tiebacks," Report • FHWA/RD-82/047, 1982. 3. Post Tensioning Institute, "Recommendations for Prestressed Rock'and Soil Anchors," 1995. Tieback anchors will develop anchorage in the competent sandstone. We recommend a preliminary design adhesion between the anchor and soil of 5,750 psf for permanent and temporary anchors. Higher adhesion values may be developed depending on the anchor installation technique. The contractor should be given the opportunity to use higher adhesion values by conducting performance tests prior to the start of the production shoring operation. A 30 percent increase in the recommended adhesion values can be used when considering seismic loads. We recommend that spacing between tiebacks be at least 3 times the anchor hole diameter to reduce the potential for group interaction. Caving may occur in the fill and coal tailings located above the sandstone, during tieback installation.. In addition, very hard drilling should be expected in the sandstone. Therefore, we anticipate that the tieback anchors be installed using casing. Grout should be placed by means of a tremie method if casing is used for tieback installations. The tieback anchors should be performance and proof tested generally as described in the above-referenced Post Tensioning Institute publication. We recommend that the performance tests be conducted to 200 percent of the design load. We recommend that at least two anchors be installed and performance tested prior to installing production anchors. The capacity of each 11 production anchor should be proof tested by loading to 1.3 times the design load and holding the load for a minimum of 10 minutes as described in the above references. Drainage A suitable drainage system should be installed toprevent the buildupof hydrostatic ground g Y Y water pressures behind soldier pile and lagging walls. Wick drains or strips of drainage material should be installed behind the lagging. A strip drain at least 1-foot wide should be installed between each soldier pile and extend the entire height of the wall. The space behind the lagging should be filled with a sand/water slurry as soon as practical. This material will help reduce the risk of voids behind the wall and will provide additional drainage of potential ground water seepage. The material should be poorly graded with no particle larger than 'A inch, nor smaller than the No.40 sieve. We recommend that the strip drains be connected to a perforated drain installed along the base of the wall. LATERAL RESISTANCE The ability of soil to resist lateral loads is a function of the frictional resistance which can develop on the base of footings and slabs and the passive resistance which can develop on the face of below-grade elements of the structure as these elements tend to move into the soil. No base friction should be used under the slab, or pile caps under the building, as it will be pile-supported. The allowable passive resistance on the face of footings, grade beams or other embedded - • G e o E n g i n e e r s 19 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599. A,...Z& J. F.? recommend that the asphalt concrete consist of Class A or B asphalt concrete mixed, placed and compacted in general accordance with Sections 5-04, 9-02 and applicable sections of 9-03 of the — 1998 Washington Department of Transportation Standard Spec fftations for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. The crushed surfacing should conform to Section 9-03.9(3) of the 1998 WSDOT Specifications. Subbase materials should consist of sand or gravel with less than 5 percent fines by weight for the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. The parking areas and access roads may experience some long-term settlement as the organic materials in the subsurface soils decompose and compress. PCC Pavements Truck Ioading docks, the lumber loading slab, the garden center rear gate slab and the slab directly in front of the overhead door pick-up area will be constructed using portland cement concrete(pcc). We recommend the following concrete slab thicknesses for these areas: • Truck loading dock-7 inches • Lumber loading slab-7 inches • Garden center rear gate-6 inches • Front overhead door pick-up area-6 inches 1.� • Sidewalks-4 inches We did not encounter soil conditions that would require special slab reinforcement beyond that which,would be used to control temperature cracking. We recommend that the base layer in these areas consist of at least 6 inches of densely compacted crushed surfacing conforming to Section 9- 03.9(3) of the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications. Where heavy truck traffic is expected, we , recommend placing a 12-inch thick subbase layer consisting of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. A geotextile separator (Mirafi 500X or equal) should be placed between the subbase Iayer and the subgrade soil. ENTRIES, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES Entries, sidewalks, and utilities on the outside of the structure may experience long-term settlement as the organic soils under the site decompose and compress. If finished grades vary by more than about 1 to 2 feet,long term settlement due to areal fills may also occur. Sidewalks along the building should be detached so that one side does not hang up and cause a sidewalk to tilt. Entries should be designed as a ramp with one end supported on the building and the other end supported on the ground to avoid the development of abrupt changes in grade. Utility lines that tie into the pile supported building should have flexible connections and be 7,1 designed to accommodate differential settlement without damage. .1 j G e o E n g i n e e r s 21 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 i ' DRAFT GROUND WATER AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS } Ground water may be encountered up to 2 feet below the existing site grades. It is possible that zones of perched ground water could develop above or in the coal tailings or silty layers in the shallow alluvial deposits across the site. We recommend that buried detention structures, utilities or other buried structures be designed assuming a ground water level about 2 feet below the existing ground surface. We recommend that pavement surfaces be sloped so that surface water flows away from the buildings. We also recommend that roof drains be collected in tightlines and routed into the storm drain system. SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 11 Seismicity- The site is located within the Puget Sound region which is seismically active. Seismicity in this flregion is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, Juan de Fuca and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American plate. It is thought that the resulting deformation and breakup of the Juan de Fuca plate might account for the 11. ► deep focus earthquakes in the region. Hundreds of earthquakes have been recorded inthe g q Puget Sound area. In recent history,three of these earthquakes were large events: (1)in 1946, a Richter L. magnitude 7.2 earthquake occurred in the Vancouver Island, British Columbia area, (2) in 1949, a Richter magnitude 7.1 earthquake occurred in the Olympia area, and (3) in 1965, a Richter magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred between Seattle and Tacoma. Research is presently underway regarding historical large magnitude subduction-related earthquake activity along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Geologists are reporting evidence that suggests several large gg g magnitude earthquakes (Richter magnitude 8 to 9) have occurred in the last 1,500 years,the most recent of which occurred about 300 years ago. No earthquakes of this pp magnitude have been documented during the recorded history of the Pacific Northwest. Local design practice in Puget Sound and local building codes have typically not included the possible effect of a very large subduction earthquake in the design of structures. UBC Design Considerations • The project site is located within Seismic Risk Zone 3 as defined in the 1997 Edition of the L Uniform Building Code (UBC). This area has a Seismic Zone Factor(Z) of 0.30. 'The UBC soil profile type is SF,which is a soil profile that requires site specific evaluation. Design Earthquake 3t The 1997 edition of the UBC recommends that human occupancy buildings be designed for an earthquake with a 10 percent probability of exceedence in a 50-year period. The design earthquake event which corresponds to this probability of exceedence is an earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 7.5 and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.3g. -tiey'i G e o E n g i n e e r s 22 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 • Liquefaction Potential and Settlement . Liquefaction refers to a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from • earthquake forces,results in development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils and subsequent • loss of strength in the deposit of soil so affected. Ground settlement, lateral spreading and/or sand . boils may result from soil liquefaction. . Structures supported on liquefied soils could suffer foundation settlement or lateral movement that could be severely damaging to the structures. In general, soils that are susceptible to liquefaction include loose to medium dense clean to silty sands that are below ground water. Such soil and ground water conditions are present at the site. The evaluation of liquefaction potential is complex and is dependent on numerous site parameters,including soil grain size,soil density, site geometry, static stresses,and the magnitude and ground acceleration of the design earthquake. We evaluated the liquefaction potential at this site by estimating the cyclic shear stress ratio which is the ratio of the cyclic shear stress induced by the design earthquake to the cyclic shear stress required to cause liquefaction. The results of our analysis indicates that some of the loose to medium dense sand layers below the ground water table have a high potential for liquefaction during the design earthquake. Based on our evaluation of t = liquefaction potential at this site, the same design earthquake as described above for human occupancy considerations is applicable. r"..1 Our analyses indicate that there is a high potential for liquefaction occurring below the site if is the site were subjected to the design earthquake event. Liquefaction could occur in the loose to medium dense sand below the site to depths of 40 feet bgs. Ground settlement can occur as a consequence of liquefaction. The potential ground settlement caused by liquefaction will vary depending on the actual levels of ground shaking, the ')_ duration of shaking, and site-specific soil conditions. If the site were subjected to the design earthquake event,we estimate that ground surface settlements on the order of 4 to 8 inches could occur if all of the potentially liquefiable soils were to produce settlement. However, settlement is likely to occur in discontinuous pockets and layers in the soil profile. We also expect that differential settlements between adjacent columns or over a distance of 50 feet of continuous footing may be on the order of one half the total settlements,about 2 to 4 inches. • • i • Mitigation of Liquefaction Induced Settlement As discussed.previously, we recommend that the Home Depot building be supported on pile foundations. Support of the building slabs and columns on properly designed pile foundations will, in our opinion, practically eliminate the effects of liquefaction-induced total and differential settlement on structural performance. FROST PENETRATION Some of the on-site soils are moderately susceptible to frost. The depth of frost penetration in this region is typically about 8 inches. The locally accepted design embedment depth for exterior footings is 18 inches and 12 inches for interior footings. Frost susceptibility for soils beneath slabs G e o E n g i n e e r s 23 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 DHAlr"1. • in heated buildings is expected to be minimal. Frost susceptibility in pavement areas is also expected to be minimal if prepared and drained as discussed. CORROSIVITY We completed three pH and resistivity tests on soil samples collected from the borings as an indicator of corrosivity. The test results are presented in Appendix B. Based on the test results and experience with other projects in the area, it is our opinion that the native alluvium is typically mildly(inorganic soils)to highly(organic silt and peat)aggressive in supporting corrosion activity for unprotected steel. In our opinion, no special treatment need be made to concrete or concrete piling. The potential for moderate to severe corrosion should be considered in selection of buried, [i unprotected steel pipes or if steel piling is considered for foundation support. Coating or cathodic protection may be necessary for unprotected steel pipes or use of steel pipes with increased wall thickness or polyethylene encasement of steel pipes may be appropriate. SOIL GASES Soil gases can be a problem at sites where significant amounts of organic soils such a.(peat-'> exist The soils encountered at the site contain an appreciable amount of organic material. Discontinuous peat and organic silt-layers were encountered throughout the alluvium at the site. Erg y.,y �................. _...._. The decayof organic material mayresult in tke formation of methane g gas. There is also a potential for the coal tailings to produce gas. Adequate ventilation is the key to preventing the buildup of methane to potentially dangerous concentrations. Therefore, based on the soils ' encountered at the site,we recommend that confined spaces located below p grade(e.g. vaults) and the Home Depot building be ventilated naturally or mechanically to control potential accumulations of methane gas. For planning purposes it is our opinion that a passive gas ventilation system under the building would be adequate. This system could include a blanket of coarse sand or gravel with a • J vapor barrier placed between the blanket and the floor slab. The sand or gravel blanket should be vented to the outside using perforated PVC pipe. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS • The soils encountered on-site are not considered to be expansive or collapsible. • Friction between the footings/slabs and the vapor retarder is not a factor since the building will be pile-supported. • There was no indication of sinkhole activity at the site. • Termite protection is not considered necessary. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Home Depot and members of the design team for use in design of a portion of this project. The report is not intended for use by others and the '4 information contained herein is not applicable to other,sites. The data and report should be G e o E n g i n e e r s 24 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 ri • provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The site development and building design were not complete at the time of this writing. When the design has been finalized,we recommend that the final design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods,techniques, sequences or procedures,except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and variations are also possible over time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations,to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time the report was ••"' prepared. No warranty or other conditions,express or implied,should be understood. 4 +) We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services to you on this :j project. If there are any questions concerning the report or if we can provide additional services, ( please contact us. • Respectfully submitted, GeoEngineers,Inc. -)Robert C.Metcalfe,P.E. Geotechnical Engineer,.' ( Mary S.Rutherford,P.E. : "~•--P-rindpal_................._......._.........,_. RCM:MSRpIg p:\00\finals\240111900rep.doc • G e o E n g i n e e r s 25 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\1015599 R'' '- 2401-119-00 10(07/99 - • .. �• ram14% - - `a:, -_.._. i,i 1: 1 ,7�,11`' 1(N ,1(I H i.q4, {'!)1.qo r, . 3ro 5 tot,. Y 1� �1 ti eo ur lAv s `,,,_ ,:._`l_.c ` t"rl'gi, dal..,...'•• I 53HDtlN 1. i°<h_ _ /! - i �._i.�eti[ii 'E' :w 3r f a !N7IL:IVs 1�'• ,.�� PONELL •V SW o �P �`'9� •rri o>� = r 1 i,y; 'I `�,4 :'eti:'4.`� tr,i r' /� �� Na m eiiloi_ c v"_s`•,4.CD c , - -' .-0V1''7r.LI f A �0� I• i\t___Iti 1101415 / �V x !, _. O 7 $;:i1'r.11'.4 \ D. �s0 RA' [Hp' 4Y� s o �d 8 I1f:e:�r.: lar n v 4 i-Tfe. i3i7ro ,...- • • - :1 . itrr. - t� -- - - - �' _ *1 o Y•Sj: 1 v 1V;' -4,rv+: .!Y' S NECA �� ra AP ,, _.,_ _ - 1 i alb^ r! E[t�I i'e I �'' i SENECA a -! y N, h I [P� I as111:il \ _3 '1'i= f • • • f'G PL IN J A Y]) S IY S 1 `�`\� N • [ � AV 4 :' SW :j;'.. ''1 YL'j AV SN — -- rraQ:� 0 _, 1900. ...:~: �1 •"+fi7LY``-/_SM +II' :+f-, ep 1til .-, > '`3."1's', "t' .4;4,�- 341E 700 11111"" li , t STEVERS AY..P MY� 1 Avls no rp ::'•.` 0 33 AY$Y� _ v 11J AYIMI (yam O O c ,•.• _1 sOIN% l '\ � ..-1W •1 rt®� * _2. c rt i to i VA L • alp AY �±y �� _J AYIIm fJ� ga r e .......i*:°:"....40 kb_ T�}� 70):73-:-.:-./. L ............. PA 0 . _~ 1.Y fit: �: rl , il fAkE ,.. .' i ,..‘,1....,..,9.. ..:: . rAY • cn O CD :':f:y:.., Y ,..r;ti 'r: ,N 1500 %Cl°'' :ilia'. lD' �^ " N s `F�P1: n•s� ;:,§ii,..;Wii.:;le F•l ''.'-;': 1V:•:,5 \ t' '4 5N1a f ¢ 8 1 �'aatq 1 11ni . LO p , N, �: . .: .; 8'1 dr i u.;. CIA ~ /ca 11 i . Tsl tJ Y• .iS ' :> i 4 1-I ,•. 1•IFM . ti S�`. ., e..1 :, :o4••.•,,a'r 'f]�1�r1t,��7t 7i 4. £E O _ � (Nn -'-fit•.i�-.._:i 'r:.,t;�,. �"• --""'..ems i.l[au r, _.. > O ,%' a,a[r,�: L:, 'F "VILE . .4,1.i. .. , '. 1014.. - -`.\" Y-+• 'zA tra. *I! 5 E g /0r AY Z �� � 1�ua #����:5ei I _ rod. © �`N O - ht- a—a -1 -9 �..�1 4.;•-, N .;j u`:>;:`y3�a :I.:NOSN ,';'14N..•. ;� r _� m a:;_,^�• A j (y i:.'A. . ... • ,___ i . 1, Si. © ELLA-.N [n S'CFOAR AV.:.:3 A'^'t: CAP' .t.1s i E0.1R ''�` �lla\• ` .\ .s,S :Tglietr. ili FILLYion �� -SE „ einap-7. •• �1P26Z_ '•1'tt•` ME! � S - 4 Or- ���7��-N-1 O "O N, {N'.r=• ,..4 !. 'GRANT '" AV 5[ �00, •. GA _ _ •5 i ... 0 SE N} I. t'.;i, , •.' • 4 1T:... C^ RD ® AV �i p -16600 [.•r" I GRANT" HIGH `• AV S'• • ':.;•, :,;�< a 11 Aoo nIn y'Y O %f_''_ .!-lY L.��• y.`, • �. .1800• . ., ip1 Y, Na:" '�ya,,ft�A:i:. -! :• fRi N O t . O w.. 1= ['Y. •rZ•,',,, 'c,' C' -- ■�� r I "s' }f�;��' ':'� �`'' �'� 1 �� N \ O -p cti-.�,i ::i:t= I �',.p..-,. [. • c7:1:: JUZIES Ft' l.'. :;:y ; JO E`==---1 `i t 1 a _ -i • .., • ^s c.;rt:i; -..ii/' �" 1 - Z c C' :•) 109TH aAV SE s • a • .F;, s��, i •x S'• ,.• � '. sf to �" 4,6:?a.. 5,9;�• 2q - la d u, :%;;...i+v K t :'�'••(.. :: . • -.i,; ©`..B(-p C -- N p L_rr'`-°-. 1.1= P �. 1,"�'yYl IWO";CA2'.t•: :Ir • '�' 4, ]�rl1L 1 yQ:Y • 1.-+ .�� HE • i-.f:' fe'1 'tl v�,1,tt:s[L. r•.•� • :�i!:Nis,, .St'�5 {•_..}'�;5:.:: I - v r411,1i(G.0 '� 0 57 - 11TH y AV S iartm s s[•:-:• li,?.i'. .• i+-ylii. �. a`w''"`i•" • FUf]] DR NE •. m 1•� L ,-. ,,,P a':: - ::41, ER �r.Y Y[Ap ��" I�IIY•,r�Yr �a^_- yi1,,r, 4q .A.•vtr�;:-•l::.i`. �1���� o =O a 1 P• . ,1 ..., --.4. /: R•r= • doi, ;Tray:;��' BRONSON �' r '� AV SE AV SE su_ /. y 1:: .`. c{'. . 6 N C7t N -_ ---- K u,'i.:-. c. .i,400'AiiNL ETU / ::M 1: . b /' d 4/ f 1,0 t `7y` L AY SE I.W 4: • ;(r ^�' • //: ;,>op/ /~/yly�../ o ,f,' y, S. Ss m x[ p:,), Ln.+ L.,--_• 115TN AV SE;;;8 I:.'u-1 nk 4 �/R��, �[!s .• %/-• •L0 t i e+ l• �/a�• ^') `.i ;IA: QN �h:per - c•+ 0 I - 6800 •^ a t,,: st 'AV Y R°`' ~ `~i '�^ _- (f IIfiiH PI `.m �, ► oo 17TH Av 10 �,r yA� :6�' j'7��;' DS '` FN ``� -r�r lif. �4� a L I./ Ah SE.. ,.{, `� f,,..)),,,�� ' .1, rl "'`py�"L, DNDN ,: NE -F • • 3 To • }s f CA �Y� �r YA �l r.. A n s • • S + �2[n (A .I 74 0; 8 1 9TH Al?SE _ ,( \d/�I . e:At, .. �a': ;..2 •le.•, t•.+`� 0. p ` : .//1^914.Y�' n 'Y `.. :' Pr. • _/ • •11-v-,, •� .4!.1. \ In �-Z�� .,'s] , 120T �.. AV $E 4 9' N � (hY a. �.c�nw r tt [,� 0:. S� /�i N .. r/ • .0. . 4,-,'Y..N" ..4- +�•p.,bi ,�F-: WMINGiO YNC �� .11ti ..-•S nbJ� ti> :A'.. .�1:k-'�Ir'�`r! 1n IIO[T rl III Al? f'•xr FEEIMUNO e �. B-12. � �s RENTON \. ;�..- ". fvr .gyp- � \ CITY S: `\` -' :.•m , \ \ n \ - - HALL 11 -- :•,; Y ::t ,k \`--. `—� 4 ''l ., .„,. . ‘./sAllit,,,,.. '.''',... / <,\\ ii ‘ ..,.... .0",-... / / i 4 / + -5 ■� �� ® 2 , ("� PROPOSED BUILDING / \I \�.\ 1 \ _ • • � ' J `8-11 _ - -B-8 A ' "F \\\ I \ 1� I ; _ 1 I I . . . ,. 9� , 1 1 �l 1I . 1 ...WI1.S t_ • \•\ �' , Imo. I I . "----,.. ; +"--....„,.. .X. \ ▪ �� `� --1.4,. EXISTING I, �= 1 i *-----.\\,:d. \\ Is % BUILDING-_\ , I' - = 1 ` f--.1: • 'to. ..i.,.,, \\,, . 7--,.. -'-•<.,..,\Ly- \ --/...- fill -I 1 • . x.,.. k tii'‘ <. ., . , . ,....„ ., __ __,,.., ,77 1 •:',;::•.!,:' ,„,,,,qc • 1 A . ... N I • WILLIAMS AVE ' �' ;` .� ..ti. 1 A N . =_ ' ` .r 1 \ ......--.7,••• \*--.7.--::,.;; ql . '‘7.2.4/.::::/ +B-19 1 I .14:4-1-...-:-.:::. —IN k. • N----.::-.--‘ --:-:::1:,...::',..-. B-16`'.\--..:•.N\- 8 8,,Z-. .. \-"‘: . ...1 ....:41.) XX • -..,k41111 / \ \x • •fir \ • \� O~ )\ :.- \ :-. , a B`1i� / '.it•- - / \ \ s • \ .\\....‘ '1/441/4.*.\s2.-Y k .-....:X\6/ B 717.....-.••.\\s , .L . ::,,, , „ ., . . .0„ . . . I i , '% s. . ,. , rn EXPLANATION: _ �, �'R \ • �' ill" — — _���Z • o B-1 BORING �` --I.% .�-4L- / . - 240 _' TP-1 TEST PIT �y'S.�' '`.. \ c�¢i \ V r _`, \� i 1 lij SCALE IN FEET a Reference: Drawing entitled "Preliminary Site Plan of The Home Depot at Grady Way.& Talbot ! •' Road, Renton, WA" by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 09/0.8.,(99-. . SITE PLAN g Notes. 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. o - 1 1- t _ 2. Boring locations not surveyed. i,i \,. \-- Geo 1, Engineers FIGURE 2 fl., / 7 -,---- • / OPANE AND , \ // /` • / / GENERATOR ENCL , I \ ib / / \ \ \ / / / --12L_TP-1 _ / - -�\-\ ___ / •t_i1NiBEft s� 33.E ' / / / - . :• • .'= �--PALLET , PROPOSED BUILDIN O t 6 ! ` ! j?.: r :'. .:,: / .. ... ENCLOSURE ' / \ / ���' / " ' / 2C 47y z so' cLR. �, C4� 6 / / � / -T.--_—, °�``a 42\CU- YD. TRASH • / / / / ' '� / , ��J 1. / 12` !x.: COt7. ACTOR L _ / ,1° / i THE HOMEJ T B-e - - / ` n. o • Z. -$6 / B-? / / / �� .0 �z - - --o l _ ° / _. 1 / " .4... ----Y.. / — 82-5 -I 35' _. ___. t-- z -�/ �' �� ----CANOPY Y ` r ---45813 3 -- ENTRY __ _'�` 1.1-7,-, •; ,30c-o- \\\:-\z, r . _ _1 /��i1111 ir�i�1✓71�/!�/!I✓ll.. 1.�! /!11 �/!1_ CUSTOMEF2 PICKUP LANE /�f/ll// _ _ ._ C_ �g8 I,I II c� / -- - -- - - . f•----- _._. P .)POSED . /f . L--- a --F----J , _ —r� B-8 ARCEL L[NES rn -:� o ea ( M ( ) c Vs ) ( ) iai,/ i - �i� - 1 s to t • o \\.\ ._..�.,0, L 1 , I .C= ) (n •) °° » s »__ _...r .�yS --- 1.- .-- ° -7 1 0 60 120 UIIIIIMIIIIB / SCALE IN FEET - EXPLANATION: o B-1-ip- BORING iNotes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. Reference: Drawing entitled "Preliminary Site ';'Ian• of The Home Depot at Grady Way & Talbot a • 2. Borings not surveyed. Approximate ground surface TP-1 -I#- TEST PIT Road, Renton, WA" by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 09/08/99. elevations used to generate bedrock elevations taken• ALJA� (;ROBS SECTION from the preliminary drawing "ALTA/ACSM Land Title BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP = Survey, Renton, Washington by Barghausen Consulting _ _ APPROXIMATE ELEVATION (FEET) 1 = - Engineers, Inc., dated 09/15/99. .. —>5 OF COMPETENT SANDSTONE Geo .- Engineers ^ T FiCUREn 3 p", .a11111.81.ey 1_•. ,. ... , _ .,.,. ... • ,.4` e • H PROPOSED BUILDING AREA H w Z O J i .. an A •� Z o EAST WEST Z -cov 60 60 - N co co ..- m . v v ° 6 Fill 30 - .-r.. ' COVery soft to medium stiff coal and 7 Coal 30 m veryloose to loose silt/ fine sand Existing ground surface 50/1" m ? 4 Coal _? 6- Coal (coal tailings) g50p/4" 4- SP 2 -,=SP_CL . 1-` i' 1 - 2- --- 4 SP-SM 1- SM SM 0 - 9 - _PT 2 - SM ML 1- Sandstcne 0 Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel / "� a) 19- with layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, 9 ==PT ?50/3 // (bedrock) 1 50 - organic silt, clay and peat. (alluvium) 6 _ ' �- 50/4"- 1, 33_ GP 6 - SM 9 / 50/5" ;1" O 50, - _35 Q 65 .r--- / 50/5" - -30 - 33 - SP ?' ? �50/6 -30 • co w 41-^GP f —• 5 -- `n 4 - CL i.�� ' o t — . / 28 • - -60 - _—?-� 50/6"- / -60 �- Weathered sandstone �'• Sandstone (bedrock) 3 a rn -90 - -90 0 CY U a) O cv a EXPLANATION: HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' m Boring .•.... . �:... Notes: 1. The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between CROSS-.SECTION A-A' widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7- Blow Count „` actual subsurface conditions macf) y vary from those shown. Geo Engineers 1 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section A-A'. FIGURE,'4 L ' ' ' C . • H PROPOSED BUILDING AREA H w B' -. B z EAST _ WEST iu En - 60 60 - t • w) N i5 0 a) w 4- Very soft to medium stiff coal and o very loose to loose silty fine sand _ (cool tailings) C1 - 30 30 - CO - m Existing ground surface m • !r q_ Coal _-_�� ri a^ �' 1 ? ? 8 - PT/ML {: ? 1 -_ � PT 11----- P 1� - SM 4"�= -sM 2 -`- P Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel with 6- - 0 0 - �+— - 2-SP SM layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, . 3=�--- 2- clay and peat. (alluvium) 6 f a0i s- su 6- 50/2"-- z- `� a=�L 3-_-_��SM Z 11----- 85/6" - I25--ASP-- 37- 50/5"- GW Sandstone - -3s- GP ¢----- (bedrock) -30 -30 - z+1--- CB i 14 ---- �50/5"— a, s- s+/a \ a �-- 19- SP !� O 12_ • -60 - as>� . -60 83/10'- :-' / So/+' 81/3.- Weathered sandstone 75/3"-`- Sandstone •:1 (bedrock) o -90 - - -90 0 a1 0 N / o Q U .-- a) O . •cl- N 6._ EXPLANATION: HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' m Boring .1•619 All Notes: 1 . The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between CROSS SECTION B-B' widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7— Blow Count •"1 '`' � Engineers /., actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. • 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section B-13'. Cr? eO\�'.^ FIGURE 5 i `l/_ I J - ilk HI PROPOSED BUILDING AREA --I EAST �+ m Z is WEST _ o N 60 - M 60 +, Y cn m 4- cn 4- y. O Very soft to medium stiff coal and45 -• a. very loose to loose silty fine sand 30 (coal tailings) , . ap CD m :: 30 - , m CO Existing ground surface 2_ Coal 2 -Coal :.� -'3 - --�---- ML/PT 1- SMJSP-SM 2 9- -SW . 2--a 2 --- 0 10 - ML - 4 _S -SM sp 0 - 11 �-_-- 2--- L 6 `? Very loose to dense silty sand, sand and gravel with ML °� 12 - SM/SP-SM layers of very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, 8--__S_P_-SM 28 - clay and peat (alluvium) 4- OL 18 • �'� 50/3" z 15 ----=ML 5g 2Q - GP �5i)/2" 26 - -SP/SP-SM 5 /6" ---- 9 Sandstone -30 22- sp (bedrock) - 34 J--- - _ 15 --=CL I w -30 - 32 -• _GP SP 17���M 11- PT rn 12-- ML/ML-CL 50/6�� tr) 5 r_CL 50/2" • - 70/4"- -60 Li o SP 25 - i ; -60 - 26 - Sandstone : 13 -r"--GSM (bedrock) - r• 50/5" 9 -90 c9 o -90 - a) 0 C • N • 0 Q �+ U Cr) T Q N EXPLANATION: r HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 30' m Boring ;: CROSS SECTION C-C' ,} ,; I. Notes: 1. The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation. between Blow Count `''' ''�Engineers widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate; 7 - - U" --FIGURE 8 N actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. Geo 2. Refer to Figure 3 for location of Section C-C.• ' l fi1 ' t ro r r;.-;c-il 3 F.. Loose Coal Tailings and Fill c . IFI c:s H, r ... 3 r - 45H, • fiH :BH, Sandstone f Base of Excavation Active 1 ,���v � Pressure Seismic �'++YY (psf) Pressure T (psf) .. Sandstone . 0—i11111J ' Passive Pressure (psf) . a) cn o Notes: 1. Earth pressure coefficients are given in terms of r- equivalent fluid pressures. 2. Passive pressures are assumed to act over 2 times the soldier pile diameter or pile spacing, whichever is less. C., 3. Active pressures are assumed to act over pile a NOT TO SCALE spacing above base of excavation and over the pile diameter below base of excavation. ir 4. Passive pressures do not include a Factor of Safety. I— A Factor of Safety of at least 1.5 should be included o in the design. v 5. Active pressure does not include traffic or equipment surcharge on top of backslope or from Benson Road South. 6. Elevation of the sandstone will vary along wall o alignment. If fill or cool tailings are present below j the base of the excavation, no passive resistance a should be considered between the base of the excavation and the top of the sandstone. \�fot CANTILEVER ORPSINGLE ROW OF TIEBACKS �e�,�EnneerS 3H:1V SLOPE FIGURE 7 C 4.1 APPENDIX A 1 DRAFT APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored during the period of September 17 to September 27, 1999. The locations of the explorations were taped from existing building corners or fences. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. Ten borings(B-1 through B-9,and B-11)were drilled into sandstone bedrock in and/or adjacent to the proposed Home Depot building footprint. One boring (B-12) and one test pit (TP-1) were completed at the location of the proposed retaining wall on the east side of the building. Eight shallow borings(B-10,and B-13 through B-19)were drilled across the proposed parking areas. Borings B-1 through B-9 and B-11 were drilled using a truck-mounted hollow stem auger drill rig and Borings B-10 and B-12 thr B-19 were drilled using a track-mounted hollow stem auger drill rig. Both drill rigs were underough subcontract to GeoEngineers. An access road to ll• boring locations B-12 was constructed using a rubber-tired backhoe. Representative soil samples were obtained at 5-foot intervals in all the borings, except B-3, using a 2.4-inch-ID, split-barrel sampler driven into the soil using a 300-pound automatic hammer falling approximately 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of sampler .} penetration is recorded on the boring logs. Representative soil samples were obtained at 2.5-foot intervals in boring B-3 using a 1.375-ID, split spoon sampler driven into the soil using a 140-pound automatic hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of sampler penetration is recorded on the boring logs. Test pit 1P-1 was excavated at the site using a rubber-tired backhoe. The test pit was excavated to a depth of about 15 feet below the ground surface. • The boring and test pit explorations were continuously monitored by a geologist or geotechnical engineer from our firm who examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples,and observed ground water conditions at the time of the explorations. Soils were classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. 5 A key to the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A-2. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-3 through A-21. The log of test pit is presented in Figure A-22. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. They also indicate the depths at which these soils or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples in the borings,the change was interpreted and is shown on the boring logs. •.r li Fit 't G e o E n g i n e e r s A-1 File No.2401-119-00-1130\101599""=` -- • SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 1 • MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL COARSE GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED More Than 50% SOILS of Coarse Fraction GM SILTY GRAVEL GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES Ar' on No.4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL 1 SW WELL-GRADED SAND,FINE TO COARSE SAND SAND CLEAN SAND More Than 50% SP POORLY-GRADED SAND -.3Retained on More Than 50% No.200 Sieve SM SILTY SAND of Coarse Fraction SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No.4 Sieve ML SILT FINE SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS Liquid Limit _ r ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLAY Less Than 50 MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY,ELASTIC SILT s More Than 50% SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY,FAT CLAY 1 No.200 Sieve U oLimit 9� d ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY.ORGANIC SILT 50 or More HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT I • NOTES: SOIL MOSTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry- Absence of moisture,dusty,dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. ifc 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is in general Moist= Damp,but no visible water accordance with ASTM D2487-90. Wet- Visible free water or saturated,usually soil is obtained from below 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on water table interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, •3 and/or test data. ��9 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 1, <j Geo���Engineers FIGURE A-1 flsoila-1.doc LABORATORY TESTS SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg Limits SM Soil Group Symbol CP Compaction (See Note 2) CS Consolidation DS Direct shear GS Grain size %F Percent fines • Distinct Contact Between HA Hydrometer Analysis Soil Strata SK Permeability SM Moisture Content Gradual or Approximate MD Moisture and density / Location of Change SP Swelling pressure Between Soil Strata TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression CA Chemical analysis Water Level Bottom of Boring BLOW COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: 22 ® Location of relatively Blows required to drive a 2.4-inch I.D. undisturbed sample split-barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a ® 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 17 ® Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 al Location of sample obtained Blows required to drive a 1.5-inch I.D. in general accordance with (SPT)split-barrel sampler 12 inches Standard Penetration Test or other indicated distances using a (ASTM D-1586) procedures 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 26 ® Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery ® Location of grab sample "P"indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. l,r:e. :i 1.f . • NOTES: `1 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report teztv.the,Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. � KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Geo �Engineers FIGURE A-2 f. TEST DATA BORING B-1' DESCRIPTION , ' Moisture Dry 11 Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±24. J .. Lab Tests (%) (pet) Count Samples Symbol ,"' 0 i'''AC Asphalt concrete ' GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium ti OL dense,moist)(fill) - Black coal tailings with occasional silty fine to medium sand - • `^" '` (medium sti$moist)(fill) —1 `^/ A. Concrete debris - . ',r n,• •5 ,,,..k A.A _ . SM 33 78 6 I L.,..."-"" Glass fragments - w. .. —2 _ ML Gray silt with fine to medium sand and wood fragments(very loose, wet) 3 —3 10 1 MD 45 75 2 ■ - - 9 _ / —4 '-SM Gray/brown silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium sand, - silt and peat layers,and wood fragments(very loose,wet) - • 15 H 1 ® • —5 n ill u u Z -- s • • a _ - L l] 20 • n • MD 48 81 1 I,' - --' . --7 • SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional fine gravel(very 25 loose,wet) _ . %F=18 1 —8 ' SS Light brown silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist)(weathered) m rn 9 `0 30 — U MD 17 109 50/3" II —17— _ a — — —10 — 35 xi — Becomes gray - 50/4.5" — —11 ;4 _ - Boring completed at 40.2 feet on 09/20/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 14 feet during drilling - o = • d, 50/5" —12 :1 LI 0 40 , — Ni- "' Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols 1 >i — '-* / LOG OF BORING Geo NOEngineers FIGURE A-3 • TEST DATA BORING B-2 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±26 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 11.!AC Asphalt `0 : GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium f OVSM dense,moist)(fill) I I. Black coal tailings and orange/brown silty fine to medium sand _ i I i (soft/loose• ,moist)(fill) —1 i I i - 5 4 Ni • r PT Brown peat and organic silt with wood fragments and occasional —2 fine gravel and lenses of silty fine sand(soft to stig moist) _ a _ j r r 10 —3 g ���, - r, —4 .%r. Becomes wet _ s 15 - SM 192 11 ■' = - . w —5 IX w r w u. I— ...: ? SM -Gray silty fine to medium sand,peat and occasional lenses of coarse _ g _ sand and fine gravel with large wood fragments(loose,wet) z F- . = • ') 0 20 _ w . 7 .1. - m —7 J 7 25 - • MD 18 109 6 ■•--.. •-••. —8 a - '`* • —9 • Increasing coarse sand and gravel 6 1. • SS Tan silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) • —10 50/2" m — Refusal encountered at 34.5 feet 35 - • Boring completed at 34.5 feet on 09/22/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 14 feet during drilling —11 f3 O o o �' t/3_? - —12 - 0 40 - `" Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols r r 1 f ,.. v 1P> �� LOG BORING .. Geo��Engineers " ' FIGUREOF A-4 a •• TEST DATA BORING B-3 1. DESCRIPTION ...,... . Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): *20 1) -. Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 0 0 AC Asphalt concrete oc,0 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - 0 00 dense,moist)(fill) .... . . SM/OL Tan silty fine sand with sandstone fragments and black coal tailings - ' 1 and occasional wood debris(loose/soft,moist)(fill) 4 3 •'.. —1 ;• • 5 •• .I• . . ' -• . . - a CI t • SM Brownish gray silty fine sand(loose,moist) :2 -... ,'•. • r;. •-•'.: SM Black silty fine sand with peat and organic matter(loose,wet) - 1 _ j 1 ••• • ..•.. . - .. . 10 • • ••• —3 PUSH 3 ML Brown silt with fine sand(very soft;wet) - 1 • . - —4 "I SM 87 PUSH CI - 1 15 _ - I— 1 3 :.-; SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt and occasional organic matter —5 co UJ • •• •. CC UJ (loose,wet) - ui z ' • PT Brown peat with gray silt layers(soft,wet) - In M 1 - I— 7 Gray fine sand(loose,wet) - z , a. 'T at . 0 20 • . • . SW Gray fine to coarse sand with occasional fine gravel(medium dense, ........ %F=4 14 a: : wet) '.....X• - (1 ) ML Brown silt with peat(soft,wet) —7 _ 4 3••••......• SP Gray fine sand with peat layers(loose,wet) _ -• •'• _ 25 • • • • Gray silty fine sand with thin layers of gray fine sandy silt(loose, _ . wet) - 3 —8 • • •• • . -.. - . • Gray silty fine sand with occasional wood fragments(loose,wet) : _ .4 g), 5 4 •• ". • ' —9 a 30 • _ •.. _ 2 %F=30 2 CV'.:•••••:: • - w .. ... .• .• - -.•• •• . SM Brownish gray silty fine sand with occasional peat and coarse sand —10 2 • (loose,wet) - 35 •:1:••. • - J". •. . ML Brownish gray fine sandy silt with lenses of silty fine sand and peat _- .• 6 (medium stif wet) —11 3 . Gray silty fine to medium sand with occasional coarse sand(loose, - (a wet) I g %F=20 7 3:: •:: •• - —12 7 ...I 73 40 V / N Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols '1 d - 1 A 9 LOG OF BORING 1 Geo., Engineers :,..: 1,••••• FIGURE A-5' mi TEST DATA BORING B-3 (Continued) 72 Moisture DESCRIPTION Content Density Blow Group } 40 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol . 1I 0 - •> SP Gray fine to medium sand with fine to coarse gravel(medium —13 dense,wet) - • 25 0 0 0 0 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt - 45 0 0 0 0 0 (medium dense to dense,wet) - o o - 37 0 0 o- O 0 —14 D 0 O 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 D 0 0 - O O 3 35 000000 - 0 0 0 —15 50 0 0 _ D O O 5 O 0 - 19 a0 0 0 = O 0 D O O o o 0 0 O —1s O 0 • 24 a 0 a - 55 /f/� CL Brown lean clay with occasional fine to medium sand(medium stif moist) - w SM 40 6 0� --17 cow - m u_ / - H /_ I-- 14 0:.••:• •. SM Brown silty fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) —18 z 0 60 • - _ X _ a 2 3 CL Brownish gray lean clay with fine sand lenses(soft,wet) o - w SP SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt(loose,wet) 5 l] ' - ML Brownish gray fine sandy silt with fine sand lenses(medium sti.$ - 65 wet) - -20 SM 31 8 0 / - SP-SM Brown fine sand with silt(medium dense,wet) Nr r 70 - ti o _ 1 U %F=12 15 0 z - .• —22 12 =... :.. 75 _ SP Brown fine to medium sand with occasional fine gravel(medium —23 — 0 dense to dense,wet) - • 00) 31 ❑: —24 -80 rcn^^, o j Nf1 71 r�r i , Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols b :, r J 1 ..� i� U l _.['t Gr r LOG OF BORING Geo--Engineers FIGURE A-5 " TEST DATA BORING B-3 (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry '' Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 80 SS Orange/white silty fine to medium sandstone(dense,moist) '! 35 ❑ (weathered) _ - -25 • 83/10" ❑ = Becomes very dense _ 85 = —26 50/4" ❑ Becomes gray and orange —27 90 61/3" ❑ Becomes light gray —28 95 75/3" ❑ —29 Boring completed at 95.5 feet on 09/27/99 - w Ground water encountered at approximately 7 feet during drilling - - w "- - —30 Z p 100• �a • 3 - 105 —32 1 -33 v _ c' 110 • , - Oce —34 115 —35 0 —36 0 0 0 120 `" Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i I- LOG OF BORING Geo NO Engineers FIGURE A-5 TEST DATA BORING B-4 DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(R): ±20 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol . 0 0 U GW Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand(fill) 0 a(1a - )o pC - x•• 000 1 - i . p o t ` OL Black coal tailings(very soft to soft,moist)(fill) —1 w - 5 - h.a MD 60 49 2 ■ �` —2 rt i MUPT Gray silt and lenses of peat and wood fragments(soft,moist) _ 22 10 !, —3 MD 66 58 2 111 PT Brown peat(soft,moist) `1,/ ML/PT Gray silt and lenses of peat(soft,moist) —4 - MD 69 49 2 ■ _ w ML Gray silt with fine sand(soft,moist) —5 ircn i..: w u_ _ w z - ~ w f ' H = SP Gray fine to medium sand with a trace of silt(very loose,wet) - z ' p 20 —6 I=- . n_ 1 2 ■ •.-.• :-.. - o —7 /" • -SP-SM Gray fine sand with silt(loose,wet) - rz 25 • • • • - SA —8 ri ML Gray silt with fine sand,peat lenses and occasional coarse gravel - v (medium stiff moist) 0 30 —9 - 6".. ■ _ cc +a —10 4 -��ML Orange/brown siltstone with fine sand and occasional organic matter(very stiff _ (highly weathered) 35 - S 18 1 —11 o — SS Orange-brown silty fine-Sandstone sandstone(very dense,moist) - co _ = 12 c 40 — .J3 .06 gt, FA:;f j Note ii:; 7 of`E.i _ pig g tom, See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols '' °'"r 43 � my �� LOG OF BORING Geo� Engineers FIGURE A-6 • TEST DATA BORING B-4 (Continued) DESCRIPTION • Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40 50/3". I Becomes gray • —13 45 50/2" ® — Boring completed at 453 feet on 09/27/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 20 feet during drilling 714 -15 50 a —16 55 P -17 W _ co Z - tit z e • _; 60 am, -19 65 - -20 —21 v _ 7 c 70 - —22 • 75 - s —23 o o —24 0 80 `s' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo -,4OEngineers FIGURE A .. ' TEST DATA BORING B-5 :',-• . . DESCRIPTION , Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): Lab Tests (%) (pet-) Count Samples Symbol 0 MEM AC Asphalt concrete —0 -..- . 0 0 o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium ' ' ' • SM/OL dense,moist)(fill) : ! , . !• Grayish brown silty fine to coarse sand and black coal fragments _ and brick fragmenti(loose/soft,moist)(coal tailings-fill)i . 4 —1 . . • r 5 i . . . . . - 4 II ML Gray fine sandy silt(soft,moist) - —2 , . r — Li J Dark grayish green fine to medium sand with a trace of silt(loose, - 10 •••:•• wet) —3 r . 7 .. ...•...• . . . _ :.; • . • •...• ••. - .'••••:•... . .- • •. •••• •• . —4 1-- . . •. .• . . . - .. .. OL Dark brown organic silt with peat(very soft,moist) 15 MD 146 31 2 111 LA-A-A-A. I- . . —5 w w . <SM/SF-SM Gray/brown silty fine to medium sand with interbedded gray fine to ci. i— , medium• sand withsilt(loose,moist) - w z .• -. •. . - 6 M , Occasional peat layers x z i— — a_ x.. . . 1 w • . . 1— . ; 0 20 • _ n.,.... .. .. w , • 1 • 4 I ::: .. • _ 0 . _ . .,,.-. • . . . SM/ML Gray and brown silty fine to medium sand with layers of gray and - brown silt with fine sand(loose/soft,moist) —7 •. . •.•. •• - . • . _ ••-. •.•. E 25 •. • • . . ' _ 1_ MD 37 79 2 I : : .:. —8 . ... - - . -. •.• . _ • •• • • • - • '. •.-. _ i co ' ) -• - . • NT • . '''''9 1 a 30 9 I 2A-1<:";OL Dark brown organic silt(medium stifC wet) - M c.) L..................... - ,....A.......A..A. . 17. k...........-....". —10 SM Brown and gray silty fine sand with occasional medium sand and a - 35 trace of organic matter(loose,wet) . - -MD 21 107 6 —••'• ••' • . • • . ' 11 )- Li' • • • . . — ..-.....• . • — '7 8 . . ...:. ••• - . 0) —12 ,- " ' 40 tilli'8lli4.. •04F.';\ ,;--. , 7.- 7 ,./.41 i'ic ),-;k;••,-7,40 , v -4 - ,,, Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols 0-:,:w r„,?••4-4:;4,k f',!!, . -4, : I . ..... Sp,. ' LOG OF BORING ' '--- ...„.., • Geo En.gineers . .• 41k,„ ,FIGURE A-7 f • TEST DATA BORING B-5 (Continued) ni. DESCRIPTION I' ' ..... Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group • Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol • 1,,_ 40 6 i : ...• • • • • • j• - ) - — k i SS Orange/brown silty fine sandstone(dense,wet)(weathered) ; _ 13 - 45 — - r • 35 1 I -•_.._,- -14 1 ; _ —_-.-7-__--- - - - Becomes very dense —15 50 —_.= 50/5" I I .-= —= - -16 •, —__. Becomes gray _ 1 50/6" I —_.1.._--_ -17 . ur Boring completed at 56.5 feet on 09/24/99 c= - Lu• Ground water encountered at approximately 9 feet during drilling _ 111- z . M - = z —18— a_ , = $ • w ' 1- 0 60 i • .uj , i. . --n•___ : - 1-.1. S - 65 - ti —20 —21 ,- 'Es 70 . • _ - [15 _ !re 1 '''''22 . _ 75 - —23 ,... - _ • o o —24 d) -- _ ,. 80 :E, — :1- CM Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols ) -- ' LOG OF BORING • ' Ge0 NOEngineerS iliklui FIGURE A-7 r t TEST DATA BORING B-6 ( ' DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density'Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±22 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol j 0N't AC Asphalt concrete — A ' GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium.�W�OL dense,moist)(fill) - F ,�n, Black coal tailings with occasional fine to coarse gravel,glass - 1 r MD 40 66 2 III fragments and wood pieces(very soft,moist)(fill) - —1 . SM Light gray and brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional _ r4 5 3 ' ••: coarse sand and coal tailings(loose,moist)(fill) - ¢ / —2 P ,-, SP• Gray fine to medium sand with a trace of coarse sand,fine gravel . : and wood pieces(loose,wet) - 10 MD 24 103 6 ■ :.' —3 SM Brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with fine to medium sand `4 - layers with silt interbeds(loose,wet) _ tr 15 6 ■. _ —5 c s; LL . H al- - M F-.1 1_ Z n_ 1 20 MD 27 99 6 II Increasing coarse sand —6 t=- a ' . .• • • . : •SP-SM Gray fine to medium •sand with •silt and occasional layers of brown —7 silt with fine sand(loose,wet) - 2 25 4 i .'. - -a SM Gray silty fine sand(loose,wet) - rn w - - i 5 5 ■ .' . . - r 1': —11 im - 00 °�' Increasing silt and a trace`o organics —12 :.1 7 40 O / 7: r Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols �� LOG OF BORING ` '"--`' ' ft.,;, , Geo�OEngineers ., ., \t/ FIGURE A-8 r TEST DATA BORING B-7 (Continued) r• . DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group r- Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 40 y u U 85/6" ■ 0 c° C - 1op t . ° 0 —13 i . )o D� - o0 d r 45 50/5" t 0 be r - oO O —14 'fr. • CH Greenish gray fat clay with fine to coarse gravel and occasional fine - I. I' to medium sand(soft,wet) —15 50 I AL 47 4 ® CH Brown fat clay(soft:,moist) III i ��ML Light grayish brown Laminated silt with occasional fine sand _ laminae(medium stiltmoist) _ 55 - SM 37 7 ® --17 r _ ca w - w Lt., • t-- "- SS Light gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - to z — 2 _ w n 60 50/5" ® _ _ :::a_ —19 1 65 Li 50/2" Boring completed at 65.2 on 09/17/99 —20 Ground water encountered at approximately 7.5 feet during drilling - 4 —21 c 0 70 - iz r-22 t 75 —23 o - - • o —24 d) ' o 80 Nr N Note:See Figure.A-2 for explanation of symbols I. LOG OF BORING r Geo,O Engineers FIGURE A-9 , . r• , f . TEST DATA BORING B-8 i.---7 , DESCRIPTION t , Moisture Dry - , .) Content Density Blow Group . Surface Elevation(ft.): ±24 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) .Count Samples Symbol • 0 AC . . Asphalt concrete _ Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium . . - • . _ . •. .f. • SM/OL dense,moist)(fill) _ Brown/black silty fine to coarse sand with occasional fine to coarse _ ' . • gravel,black coal with brick fragments(very loose/soft,moist) _ i • (fill) _ F 5 • - -7 MD 52 55 3 1 - • OL Black coal tailings with occasional fine sand(very soft,moist)(fill) —2 • r , . u , . „ - , —3 10 11 . MD 66 49 1 X . - - - ••• -4 1--1-- , ,•;•;•:,SW Brown fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and a trace of -I. .*.•.•.•.I . silt(loose,wet) -. . . . 1-• .15 *.•.*.*.- - 9 I _ —5 c'3 . tu :-:•:•..... .....*.... . . - w w . . . . . . . . . I-- •. u_ .. . • •• 7 11.1• • ML Gray silt(stifC moist) 7 . I-- - — ' —6 1.- . . • . 0 20 - a_ ui•., ) . - czi SM 39 10 0 . - -- . ,[ . L... • . - tl 25 - MD 24 100 11 N .....:..-SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt(medium dense,wet) - %F9 . hi '• '- = • - • • • • •• .... •, • —8 -- ' .....•"... • . - II en , a) •:. :'SM Gray silty fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) V —9 a 30 - : 3 SM 49 12 li'.' :. • -•%F=24 -. tr . . - . .• - ,—10 . . SP .• wt•-,1 •.. .• - Gray fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and silt(medium _ 35 ., . .. ... . . dense,wet) _ %F=8 28 I'rt —11... .. ... .• .' •'. .. .. •.. .. .. •. .. . - 0 . .. . . . • • R -,, cb : ,-• —12 •.- i . 40 . 7. , --, NI Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols - ;.. ..•: •• •-• • ki•:l:. - . ti;T i '''Ai ' ."•:::,;i:I'LOG OF BORING 1 4/2. Ge .... .„,,, .. o ,...... Engineers FIGURE A-10 ‘....:„. • r! , TEST DATA BORING B-8 (Continued) DESCRIPTION 1, i Moisture Dry ,•-• Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pet) Count Samples Symbol 40 .. .. . 15 ML Gray silt with fine sand(stiff moist) - . —13 . - SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt(medium dense,wet) _ :. • 45 - MD 24 101 26 —14 • - %F=6 . .SW Gray/brown fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and a L_ ...... . -...-...- trace of silt(medium dense,wet) - . . . . . r. . : .,.. . ... - Gray fine to medium sand(dense,wet) ••••15 • .-• •-. 50 ..... . . - r 34 • ••.• - ti o o 0 GP 0 Do 0 0 Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt - (dense,wet) O 0 —16 O 0 o -;--; 0 0 O o o - o o . . i....: o o o - O o 55 o - 32 r... -••- Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel(dense,wet) —17 : ' i•- Grading to medium sand - u) LI) m U.I . . .;. - ill U- . • .•. I- - LU Z M - PT Brown peat with wood fragments(stiff moist) 'a z — i— 0 0 1, in 0 60 MD 218 21 11 114 1 0 0 •,,,,_., —19 ML-CL Gray silty clay with lenses of peat and wood fragments(stiff moist) : 65 j MD 29 95 12 I ML Gray fine sandy silt(stiff moist) —20 •1:1 - a cr, —21 v• - 1,1 76- 70 MD 32 91 5 111‹. - CL Gray lean clay(medium stiff moist) - ce - • —22 •". - a - 75 SP Gray fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) - •1 —23 • .. . - — 12 feet of heave at about 77.5 feet " % • • c) - 9 —24 cr) • . —o '7 80 : i - NI- ) cq Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols , •.;;, ...-.4 gib LOG OF BORING Geo Engineers ik.,•••P FIGURE A-10 . ._ v - TEST DATA BORING B-8 (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 80 25 ® —25 Y • _ t ; _ • r' 85 26 MD 19 110 26 ■ Occasional fine gravel - E ...... ....._ —27 ......... _ ri- 90 13 • • SM Gray silty fine sand with fine sandy silt layers(medium dense,wet) —28 SS Tan and gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - L• _ Boring completed at 95.8 feet on 09/21/99 95 = Ground water encountered at approximately 11 feet during drilling —29 50/5" ®— - F - tt w f u!L - tL _ - w Z —30 M = Z • ' I— - n _ ' 0100 _ a~. to , - o —31 105 —32 : i ` aJ _ iiiii a> 33 o) v, - c 110 tz - Lg U -34 re _ -.w • 115 • —35 o ,cry, —36 - o - d, 120 o / Iv Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols �9 LOG OF BORING ir''' Geo �Engzneers li/ FIGURE A-10 TEST DATA BORING B-9 • DESCRIPTION ) Moisture Surface Elevation(ft.): t21 Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol ) 0 SAC Asphalt concrete _ ° ` °GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ OL dense,moist)(fill) _ Black coal tailings with occasional silty fine to medium sand and _ ,� wood fragments(very soft,moist)(fill) _1 - • 5 - MD 27 71 2 ■ - - 4 e • —2 SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with silt layers and coal fragments - (very loose,wet)(fill) -3 10 - 1 •. SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt and brown silt and peat layers • (very loose,wet) - -4 15 2 I CL Gray lean clay with peat lenses(soft,moist) - -5 (/' w - in z - _ z I-- ��PT Peat with silt and fine to medium sand lenses and occasional wood )_ p20 �� fragments(soft,moist) fa MD 147 32 3 I, t 0 0 o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and occasional - 0 o wood fragments(very loose,wet) _ 0 0 0 25 000°0 - Li MD 45 79 2 1 �OL Gray/brown organic silt with fine sand,and peat lenses(very soft, —8 wet) _ fil ,-......-........ - rn SP-SM Gray fine sand with silt(loose,wet) - v —9 c 30 . . - MD 27 94 8 ■-•. :•• _ U cc - �/ —10 ice^^h OL Brown organic silt with lenses of gray fine to medium sand - i.j (medium stiff;moist) - 35 A.A.A.w - - MD 64 53 4 1 " -11 0 0°Gp Gray fine gravel with fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt(medium _ . 00) '.0°0° dense to very dense,wet) —12 0 0 0] '' 40 o 0 -E. 7 NI-or Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols 1 1 • �� LOG OF BORING Geo N�Engineers FIGURE A-11 TEST DATA BORING B-9 (Continued) F 7 • DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests .(%) (pcl) Count Samples Symbol 40 20 bJ0 0 o 0 o ` - O O O O 0 - O 0 0 - O O ` 0 0 0 --13 50/5" i00000 - O 0 - O 0 0 O 0 - 45 b 0 0 r- 0 0 50/6" .000 —14 0 0 f • 0 O 0 i- O O O 0 00 - rt P� SP Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel and occasional coarse _ kgravel and a trace of fine sand(medium dense,wet) —15 50 - 22 - � '—16 , CL Brown lean clay(medium stiff moist) - 55 15 SP Gray fine to medium sand(medium dense,wet) —17 a"i w _ rn w - o_ w '..ii u. z _ - t— —18- a 60 I— a 17 It •: . SM Gray silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel(medium _ p dense,wet) _ --1 —19 -j 65 •• - J 50/6" = SS Orange/gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) —20 ii70 - -22 Becomes gray �1 70/4" ❑ _ - 75 = - Boring completed at 75.3 feet on 09/23/99 —23 Ground water encountered at approximately 9 feet during drilling - o - oo)9 —24'1' 80 d :? Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo 4.--.Engineers FIGURE A-11 P'• TEST DATA BORING B-10 sue? . . DESCRIPTION j Moisture Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±20 i ) Lab Tests (%) (pet) Count Samples Symbol 0 SAC Asphalt concrete 0 0 2 GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium - ,�OL dense,moist)(fill) - .k'° tailings wi th coal ith wood particles and pockets of brown silty _ �`�M sand(very soft to soft,moist)(fill) R i 3 III............-....A. -1 A T; 5 ././.�X. - MD 34 78 1 ■'"-''`r - �^^'`" -2 ,,,,.q ....,..�.A„ - ;, 10 ML Blue-gray silt with fine sand,wood fragments and coal particles — 11 (very soft,moist)(fill) - 2 SM �y fine sand with a trace of silt(very loose,wet) Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 10.5 feet during drilling ro 15 w- i- to z • sl a 0 20 i } i.r • rl //' , 25 == =ruak ,.,.,..,„:-..;,...„..„ p„„ ,,,,,:::.„,,,,„::::„. cn V 1 r c 30 Y Its y ` : i 'w w" c. 00 o) — 40 • S. m• ) • `' Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols Lo LOG (G eo��Engineers . F1GUkt'. € TEST DATA BORING B-11 r, DESCRIPTION 1 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±19.5 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol oia`AC Asphalt concrete —_ 0 0 -" ? GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ •SP dense,moist)(fill) - and occasional wood fragments(loose,moist) —1 t_. Gray fine to medium sand with occasional gravel and a trace of silt z , 9.77 5 - 6 . • - Becomes wet - —2 ill 10 _ -3 2 MD 30 96 4 : _ El SM Gray silty fine to medium sand(Ioose,wet) —4 t_.; 15 2 l : •'. t- SM Gray/brown silty fine sand(very loose,wet) .5 C w • • o_ u_ tw- z - w 2 a - z •i p 20 —6 H a j MD 264 18 9 - w PT . Brown peat with silt(medium stif moist) c GP-GM Gray fine to coarse gravel with fine to coarse sand and silt(medium — o . o dense,wet) - ?3 25 0 • o - ar.3 19 I .o 0 0 —g •o 3 • o a, o . c _ .4. o —9 '' o 50 30 ]° .° ° Becomes dense re . o - o ' a _ ' .0 —10 • o c 0 r 35 0 . o - • o 4 MD 7 132 33 ■9 ' c o —11 N. 0 0 - o - 0 0 . o o, • ° t Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols i 3 4� LOG OF BORING Geo�l Engineers . FIGURE A-13 H- TEST DATA BORING B-11 (Continued) r DESCRIPTION Moisture Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol • 40 0 a Becomes very dense '' 50/4" ■ . ° - o . a - • 0. - o ' 0 —13 .0 - o o - 0 - 45 0 . o - r65 SP Gray medium to coarse sand with fine gravel and a trace of fine '14 sand and silt(dense,wet) - r-15 50 • - • 33 ■ - E . . • •. ° GP Brown/gray fine to coarse gravel with medium to coarse sand and a - °o 0 0 o trace of silt and fine sand(dense,wet) o O O ee 55 O O - O O O 41 ■°°°°a. —17 )- o o - u: i z: ttr p/CL Brown-gray lean clay(sofa,moist) _ W z _ z_ W F- MD 46 72 5 �o S —19 Becomes gray - r- 65 - tfi / 4 Ivs / —20 V SM Red-brown silty fine sand(medium dense,wet)(highly weathered o°'i sandstone) —21 v 70 r.� o - 5 15 ■ - U —22 75 . 28 I'., .'• —23 - oo = SS Gray silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist) - —24 ca 80 ' Tr o 1 ,. `' Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols -•„ LOG OF BORING Geo��Engineers FIGURE A-13 Y< TEST DATA BORING B-11 • (Continued) DESCRIPTION Moisture D Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 80 • 64/10" 1� _ Boring completed at 81.8 feet on 09/22/99 - Ground water encountered at approximately 5 feet during driIIing —25 85 —26 —27 90 _- f', F•: —28 95 r29 1- w to Ui - w z - w —30z a _ z i O 100 -.. w w a —31 105 —32 rn —33 - 0 110 8U —34 S i - 115 35 a o —.36 ai 120 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols GeoOrLk. LOG OF BORING Engineers FIGURE A-13 a • TEST DATA BORING B-12 • DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): f44 L Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 . SM Dark brown silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and i( nails(loose,moist)(fill) —1 5 •6 ■ - . MD 9 88 - -2 • ram. •,• SP Light brown fine to medium sand with coal fragments(loose,moist) �. 10 . (coal tailings-fill) —3 7 11 OL Black coal tailings with brown silty sand and fragments of orange E sandstone(medium stiff;moist)(fill) I_y ""V"` Seepage at 10.5 feet - �.. � M —4 15 . �.u...,�7 ■..A. ... - —5 cc v.�..�ti u_ = SS Tan and orange silty fine sandstone(very dense,moist)(weathered) - H z w o- w 20 la MD 12 98 50/1" ■ = ;t Becomes light gray —7 25 50/4" III — ` - 3 - -8 ii - —9 c 30 50/4" ■ - U _ Very hard drilling at about 33 feet 50/1" ❑ — - —10 Boring completed at 33.5 feet due to refusal on 09/27/99 - Ground water seepage encountered at 10.5 feet during drilling 35 - —11 o • o co - 40 —12 0 c " Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo�•O Engineers FIGURE A-14 TEST DATA BORING B-13 • DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry } Content Density Blow Group - Surface Elevation(ft.): t21 ` Lab Tests (%) (pet) Count Samples Symbol • 0 AC Asphalt concrete 0 °. °GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ dense,ense,moist)(fill) - f.1 • Brown-gray silty sand with sandstone fragments and coal(soft, - ;- moist)(fill) 17.4 5 2 1- • - —2 - 10 •SM Gray silty fine sand with occasional coarse sand(loose,wet) —3 PUSH ID ••'•• •. - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 0924/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling - �• —4 1 r - 15 - w —5 0 w - w u_ f- Z - w - - z .,0 20 —6 = _ a~. .. w p :.� —7 i, 25 ` —8 - w r rn 30 = t) - rc 11 —10 1_ 35 - -11 - O ' O • uf -; f � ',t ,}f �- ( '` °Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols .�v: Ll( '• t:` �i I ti �� LOG OF BORING' .caM,w' Geo�O Engineers FIGURE A-15 TEST DATA BORING B-14 17, t. DESCRIPTION ,.) Moisture Dry Surface Elevation(ft.): f19 Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests- (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol r 0 —AC Asphalt concrete _ 0 0 0 o GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ ,,,,,a,„OL dense,moist)(fill) - Black coal tailings with wood fragments and occasional zones of _ • ""`"'` gray silty sand and occasional fine gravel(soft,moist)(coal —1 3 ■`^`'A^ tailings) - a-• 5 1 ■: :. SM Gray silty fine sand(loose,moist) - I. . —2 s` ' - Li • -3 10 ML Gray sandy silt with organic material(very soft,wet) - ii PUSH ■ - Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 0924/99 Ground water encountered at approximately 10 feet during drilling —4 tt - 15 - —5 co y-. 1._ - w w H LU - IA4 z z _ •a )X • p 20 ,'¢. i -7 1 25 - 111 —8 j7, O) co —9 In - el t 2 30 - rt —10 35 - -T —11 - o - d, —12 i 7 40 0 `" Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols j -Ak LOG OF BORING Geo„pEngineers FIGURE A-16 (n re Dl�ry BORING e_' (pet)!tY Blow 6 ION COunt SarnPle Crou , s sNril of �`9C Su D and and a trace 3 M��`�OL Pha/t concr E/eyatron($). *2 IV of silt(medium 7 Y4ne ro ere 2 cluding concrete and scrap l� �� Pmetal ����� B/a kns�'noscotarseve 7 r1+ cl aa—/rellln)(fdl) l u,rhsan 1 • • Sp ntoisr 8s with d and a gments Orange )(coal tael b•n11 including cow of silt(madlu ith sandstone and coal fra (loos 47. to coat ) ncreje Bud sc�P metal rn 2 (8//) sand w� era/ ��,ti� th�udstoae and coa/ r'Mfi,�OL f''agnren� th Pockets of gray silty sand g v��� Black ne to�a �e coal . 24/99 Bo°n8 wet)(QOa!r tatlin8s 2 amately 10 feet during moundPle�Utll fe ,fi//)w'thPocke fgra Ysil �g drilling o 4 ater daraoa p924/99 lY sand r°Proat 3 elY 10 fit dung drylrn 5 la 0_ 8 w !— 4 al ZI is a 5 , I-.. 7 2 s �z zu C 8 7 9 10 . 9 11 U11t . i 13 'ols °`` 12 11 12 L oG of e�RING FjGUReq`'8 I T BORING B-17 DESCRlprloN e El ))i(ft.): t19.5 DESCRIPTION 0 . Surface Elevation(ft.): t21 vel with sand and a trace of silt(medium _ Group ce of silt(medium ` Asphalt concrete d and a tra coarse gravel,pockets of gray silty sand ant Samples Symbol AC fine to coarse gavel vntt►san soft moist)(coal tailings) —1 medium (fill) 1 O GP Back.coal moist)(fill) soft to m stiff dry)( - M���OL Black tailing ( Avery loose,moist) 6 10011A 1-li 2 011111 2. ��� $ec0ntes moist 4 *OM a material(very soft,wet) 3 MI�M� s - 0111111 �' it. 0924/99 M11MA Bermes wet approximately 10 feet during drilling —4 MI�N� ateiy 10 feet during drilling 4 - 2 M��� Boring water en at 11.5 feet on roxim99 ~ Ground water encountered at approximately - —5 Cl)5 n tu w - ca� ur - III - z Z. iw a D —7 8 —8 • 9 —9 10 —10 - 11• —11 12 —12 lee Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF gORlNG. FIGURE A-19 --_—_ • TEST DATA BORING B-18 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): *23 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 0 0 o AC Asphalt concrete o 0.. GP Gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt(medium OL dense,moist)(fill) Black coal tailings with fine to medium sand and occasional wood 5 .�M matter(soft,moist)(coal,tailings-fill) —1 wvn 5 4 ■`^s'"` ^ • —2 10 ;�� -3 3 ■�..�..� -J Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 - i —4 15 w —5 rn a: w UJ - w ~ r z n. } 0 20 -6 1— a_ ui •t - ❑ —7 25 • cri rca - v —9 30 0 U r -10 35 - ii 40 —12 Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols a LOG OF BORING Geo O Engineers FIGURE A-20 sue. TEST DATA BORING B-19 • DESCRIPTION ,, Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±18 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 0 0 0 GP Gray fine to coarse grave1 with sand and a trace of silt(medium I, ° 0 dense,moist)(fill) M1' Bluish green silt with fine sand and occasional organic matter and - charcoal pieces(soft,moist)(fill) - 7 5 I —1 5 /ML Grayish brown sandy silt with occasional wood particles(soft, r 2 ■ l moist)(fill) ti . �OL Black coal tailings with coarse sand and wood fragments(very soft, —2 moist)(coal tailings-fill) ..�n.A-A. - i 10 ML Gray sandy silt with occasional roots(very soft;moist) —3 1 ■ Boring completed at 11.5 feet on 09/24/99 —4 - 1 s i 15 - w • —5 mu). � • H z w = !— 11 n_ t ~ • • p 20 j i 'd❑ L - j —7 r1. 25 - L —8 a. _ c - 0cm 30 —9 m - _10 'l - 35 - :af —11 O _ O .,� —12 40 .ic) l `" Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols 1 • LOG OF BORING Geo N�Engineers • FIGURE A-21 TEST DATA TEST PIT TP-1 • .3.7F -!! DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry _ 1 Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): ±47 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol I . ; "7'0 . b I 0 z 0 0 GP ' Brown sandy fine to coarse gravel with organic matter(roots) _ ..--- 0000 o (loose,dry)(fill) _ f , <-. .n. OIJSM Black coal tailings mixed with light brown to orange silty fine sand _ ; ; • ; , • and organic matter(roots)(medium stiff/loose,dry)(fill) - g 1 ! I: • —1 . . 5 77; !. • . I 1 i• : e.,... i 1 1 • . 7 1 I I• - _ d • g i i i: —3 10 _ — „Flt A bd• Ei i I li • —4 . -P: , • ii :15 0 , Test pit completed at about 15 feet on 09/25/99 . r Minor caving along sidewalls for full depth r w ' , ce ..,-T - LL, u.. 1-- • - w .,...: . - = z 1-- . . a_ -\ I Ui 20 • —6 i— '‘ p ., a. - ur . o A- - _ -. .../ • : —7 , ,•: ;-..fs • r 25 F'tt _ . . . -g —a _. _ 3 . .. .i. —9 a 30 , _ 1 2 — • —10 a _ . ,. 4-, —11• . . ..-" . . --__ 40 l —12 •.-% 479 A • Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols ' ! • I ..- LOG OF TEST PIT figy. Geo •••fo'Engineers 44kluio. 1 . FIGURE A-22 • co X w a. . a. . , . 1 rErm - -I • DRAFT APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING GENERAL Soil samples obtained from the boring were transported to our laboratory and examined to confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate engineering properties of the soil. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing consisting of moisture content and density determinations, percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve, and Atterberg Limits. The tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of the)American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM)or other applicable procedures. VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS All soil samples obtained from the borings were visually classified in the field and/or in our laboratory using a system based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM ti classification methods. ASTM test method D 2488 was used to visually classify the soil samples, while ASTM D 2487 was used to classify the soils based on laboratory tests results. These classification procedures are incorporated in the boring logs and test pit shown in Figure A-3 through A-22, in Appendix A. MOISTURE CONTENT Moisture contents were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 for several # _ samples obtained from the borings. The results of these tests are presented on the boring logs at the respective sample depth in Appendix A. DRY DENSITY Dry densities were evaluated for several relatively undisturbed samples obtained with the split-barrel ring sampler. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 2937 and the results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A at the respective sample depth. :� SIEVE ANALYSIS Lfs Sieve analyses were performed on several samples in general accordance with ASTM D 422. Several samples were "washed" through the No. 200 mesh sieve to estimate the relative percentages of coarse and fine-grained particles in the soil. The percent passing value represents the percentage by weight of the sample finer than the U.S. No. 200 sieve. These tests were conducted to verify field descriptions and to estimate the fines content for liquefaction analyses purposes. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1140 and the results are shown on the boring logs in Appendix A at the respective sample depth. • • - G e o E n g i n e e r s B-1 File No. 2401-119-00-1130\101599 DRAFT ATTERBERG LIMITS Atterberg limit tests were completed for two soil samples obtained from B-7 and B-8. The , tests were used to classify the soil as well as to aid in evaluating index properties and consolidation characteristics of the clay deposits. The liquid limit and the plastic limit were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results of the Atterberg limits are summarized in Figure B-1 and also on the respective boring logs in Appendix A. The plasticity chart relates the plasticity index(liquid limit minus the plastic limit)to the liquid limit.. • CORROSION TESTING Three soil samples were sent to Norton Corrosion to evaluate the corrosion potential of the • soils. The samples were taken in the coal tailings, organic silt, and peat that were expected to �-' have the highest corrosive activity which could damage pile systems. The results of Norton Corrosions analyses are attached(Results not available for the draft report). i I ? r 4 • Si g ' ti G e o E n g i n e e r s B-2 File No. 2401-119-00-.1130\101599 eta. _`--- I. > :, ..,,. . 1 2401-119-00 RCM:MBB:mbb 9/27/99(Atterbergs.ppt) PLASTIC ITY C HART • CD .0 • 60 . An s . / \XVI 50 til • Cg• CH or OH CD • o 40 • • ,' Z 4, ,,, oCA 30 !,. F CO . f OH and MH n- 20 . I _ CL or OL cEii D _ 10 .. m I. CL-ML ML or OL m, 0 , • m m0 ' 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 c •g LIQUID LIMIT m ccnn 93 --t _ -' cn m EXPLORATION SAMPLE MOISTURE LIQUID PLASTICITY SYMBOL NUMBER DEPTH CONTENT(%) LIMIT(%) INDEX(%) SOIL DESCRIPTION m cn . c Cl) ® B-7 . 50' 47 53 27 Brown fat clay(CH) 8-8 70.5' 32 34 14 Gray lean clay(CL)