Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA00-125
V 1 , .I• < .,• • • /. 'i ...v ::;( ' /TR's•„ ,,,-;..._ fs i ''.4.'s 5 , + 04• vs) 1, 7 0 LIZ i __ /... 43 ,•'a ,, .36 0 • . M / --. _ -i Q.,4 • ov't. Lot 2----,i;'.../.• 037 - :9 . --tmi 32.00 Acrg§ -r..1'/ 88 "a .4e, 4? :67/ ... .„..r,F:..... ..*:= ..J , -4,n-T- ' i" -: -`7' • iv ..,,,,LE,101 .. a .7 ‘-•,,s .0 _-_!,.....i 1 i •..., 3 41 , "0.I:0 2..... B11112q P.'IW t 1X5' i ' ----. ,. . .9] 9 l4) B 1 : _t — ,? ..... _. ri.,-A0,1,. iv x ,3, i •ili, MI IPC,,,,,,...!.' 0 ith7to,thl .SP•27j.B.1 ,„ z--1--1..7:i02:-7,-_,e5Z,r,.;"_ -e LI \ '000).il "I $- i. ; _ .,. tE4,4y,51-----• ,..•,----- th,"" ,7s, 5.,:' _ • ir --._=:Elb, . ,o2 i __Pi 37TH ------ Y, ....--.„,--T-,i----- -. , • 0 • .e,,,,,• . E3, 1 3,g t? ! 7,1-5-Ai, Aiiitte4.,,, i 0'0 ' E ii,-;.,,ha • . . .--e,,,' ‘ fl'''I: Errn aritalt*. 1 pg F5' Pad, ,F1,,E„ 1 • N. ' 36TH ST. ) 2 • •itignm_..14 - 1r- 3-313i 11;1 *INCVia I 11.1.. It: :L Efilip.SillINIM . . --111----6 4.1 .L r. "..""."-.7 N: 35TH ST. [ :j!• ;1-,' pet n -,,, _______--- 1 1 • iii .T5 Gs [23 19• ul .,..!. , 1,--2. , u „ © CITY OF RENTON At1 = ° ' sal Planning/Building/Public Works � 9 $ ea OCT 13'00 r.1.°e4t Z0 .305 , 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ha .°P ':2 - METER . ADDRESS SERVICE.REQUESTED �� 7158401 U.S. POSTAGE G j r l26 DU i :-/ _�3a1.-- 1 LE5E708 980562022 1699 16 10/17/00 � 33427 J i FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND �•' ---,-,. �{i ; LESS LAKE WA51-SINGTON BLVD N IIII37t {✓, RENTON WA 98056-1506 >: RENNG WA RETURN TO SENDER - H.l}'tlG--t, 'v4 a+- - ii i i i ii i i i i ii i ii i i.i i i .i 'si i --� r :z ii. :::cEFF •FFiFFi:r.-a i..Sti::: •i.i'FiFiFFiFi. ii z �Y NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H,SME/LINDAHL REMODEL . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed,the project would require approval of • a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8(R-8)zone,are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback,as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction Dingle family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. ' PROJECT LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Shoreline Variance,Zoning Variances(3),Shoreline Exemption Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to LESLEY NISHIHIRA, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2000. This matter is also • scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that'the hearing.has not beeru'resche'duled If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appearat the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner, If you have questions about this proposal, or wish.to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact.Ms'. Nishihira at(425) 430-7270.::,Anyone Who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this:project, PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • DATE OF APPLICATION: September 22,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13,2000 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 13,2000 . ,v : P 3 • , __ a Yn , q/ 49. -9 i . Qt • ov't.Lot 2__-.,_ _ 3 - '32.00 Acres_-::/'.? ;r s6 • - :e sy t wpm - 'p_' ys`. L f S uu V=]s.. G - . ISLE IP', -P K9 .o �v L(3f•" " -- a - "--- '-la � - :N. � 37TH Wraj • o I` N• •36TH ',ST,' ,:CL .. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2 * N�yy(�� R" — �' `, /.i N 35TH ST. O � 1 at o ' IN .i•• .n 0 /: › S ts /"' 57A M /// /Vi. I, i; ,g i'N I -- ' 1, .75 40 't (13 V .N. / • .• • %, 4os.e `r_ / _--ir- 49 :g Q� • ov t. Lot 2 __ = : :° o� N, S. :`• �,` tat I'� 093I ), t44 • 32.00 Acre- 1- � fit 4• 0 259.1 119. i/./ -_- - - r :87 / 9 �� �/ �i �.� --- 2b1.b I R. a e----Z a _=� "— ' . • 86 Q vj / • 4 7 t)h 5 OV _ .' • at- /- __ w%i; ISLE ,AND A. � �., ,.�a.r S�,�E P �13' • 1 _k.-- g� r'""me it,. 2 Q S\, - -21 tl 75 75 5 to \15 15 _Q 1? b5 b . _ ';u r i11 T. [ 11 11 15A -0-. . a __ e ms% Q."1S? s IEW _ L",�g►D - _ _ y/ _ _ 141.1Z 2 1139 sa 65 15 17 lao`- 60 • 9 // 14012 r' 37 _ r 410 N I% -44 f/S4/:' t_ (I) I _ 1 373! __ S.P. 027 84 —+--- • - // 181.3 20 go 75 __y B :- 1--Ibrf_ 395 •cccu ---4• /w,' n9sz -isow 10 —�—•i--, r,— -- --•1 h' ;ir7 i LUA-9Z-047-5HPL I ♦ 8 y�ti ,n (2) .. r _ !•�.r (g l21 LMTy �.'f - ,o•gcutt .sm, �`5 81 2 ,/ '.S.P.039-83 -- r 90.39 WgQ7 — itia.:370;i:. , , 21 I 8g ,z. g LIO%)"7 - CI sl•k. ‘• • 302.1 1 25 —— — 1 / =-:132.1=-T--95--1----=300--___�_ a 0 N. 37 TH � ' PI i - �396,• a36 i 63 + 7a J 85 8 I 9$.31 42.01„`n 1 r---- „/ : IT 9s o W 0 0, ,4114• 41 �' e - ' i 911 o:s I so 4o go i l0 3$ I - •, 135 a �=� o L +l 3.07 -_-_- ..i%5/4 60 1 D6Q8 0 ''-/' O 1i1 c to g�{7 ' co !40 b 110 30 ° T•- Q67.,n l/ t 1 • 2 !6-4- --iI 6 1 1 it:8 9 II 12 I 15i�1E ' .,1i 1 ,a — 1—, o f .It W ' 36 2 �) 11 5p _ 4` •• I �15 SQ 5�+ 251251 so '- I : / • i0 .. SO •4 31.5j)5 5o IN co;11 4f;r o ` N. 36TH , ST. I a 25 2 2 50 • ForWEr 11•5 ••o 1251251- 513 IT' • a ' p • OI {I. ' + �• 1 13 15 116 7.1/ I+ l I 21 22 Q • •�r"T ��� � +� 35 �� 33 3 31 30 29 (� I ` 461 41 .1 5 3 4i , .1 ,,y 39�„36is. N_ 1 1 ' I to i ' ��� ^+ o , 6J 1 50 25,25 1• '� „Et, `140 ) i>D • Jell w o _� N. 35TH ST. Z o . 1sv12c ��a so •2slu • 1 / . .4 ® UJ 3 4 . 1 I I�e���JJ . 7`�. 9 p v110 11 12 IV I4 . +14 1 18 1 20 2 2� I455 W 1 • �_I.J.1�-__i.-f.. 44•,�,rs tra-f---;���� :." + I .74,4V• {•'-it--r 79 1 IE)LHD R1ObT?WA, / mvw[u n SITE DATA [RA to,eKY,d/ arsd.Yra amrem..ml ,O . :ryR Duwvrns.e.ax / -boil,MSS T Pf / ~''b, lab MlO3P. _ Pad....DM a[ l�\ 5....rl lea-Baal y tar gra P.w.,rysar uaa.• mast[ V Ilv'1.5' /. _ Millaraillinl1 numb.. % �J' mlml ,vac la/ a.,mn. ..,..MTSm 'a'I%lip I_ ,a ,p y — ' ?R7frL'-- co' n [� mna� �J, ��.1' OVIc �J-dte) %'�' J > (HI eareal o-mr m.1r oral awmeu aaa.-.x al / ?ss d 'I !�' ' t `p' �i Q I, �O ~wksSaa L LAKE WASHINGTON7 rs'°"It .wr I ' 4� oP // "I r "apalrfMaDax & 4)u "' `' LUNDAHLRES __ r ////////Nli.,_ J� i feamwaW,m..n-lua[ [ ,,,-,e iN_. N "q / h n '� / .T3 z� / Qu.a,.pe.m' aa..rx.vm.-Dsa3 maaamaa..a „ — I _ "'^,Jr/ "j 4, S\ . vain Earera.a.a•Sx3a[IaMaas Pna-HNm(a')rl L' \iu�\,'�S�// (Vmaw.sapa a3..m-Su ®.s•3®btlYfiva.µ)3.lmp.em.aae ryr �u•n,".X- J nn�m pl, ,- )....„.Q,rl_..., , Q Y 1111 Q • 7 P m Para r• I at /J(y)+r „�� _ 1 , �_/ *elf Tamar are EarSane �- - I.•[.H�f-r' _- is _[, I9pr(y/J LN[.Iw/Ia..�FJ U Sm..3Pmma I m ^-24") Vlir^.. .SITE LEGEND: nw®+[i.m: >�a.+m•ae.a.®,3emmawmu[vacm.mar.®a «n /,.. .'" z d emn.a plan wafts apa rt..m.m.R mad atma.a�.rrmawmia,m.wtaaarPa- Vasa s,.as..a. .e....d.adq...:may .a.... W aaa '///.ae.eq.meame..wm+vam..a..r1m. Q Y .(eJs .����\\� .mba.m.a.wm�.e,m,m..a®am...e. .. `SOUTH NEIGHBOR .a..a.aadamhem p..meaa� '3 4 3FI-z4 S.fANiLT R'"4. ��µ�..®maea....vrmpmm,. 3 B —N—aR..r.I arnama.muam area r— � ..m[omaa...r.w•.mmm.ww.Raa.amm SITE PLAN •a • 11l lei_oll NORTH Lr t) y oyi .I T 0'fa7ah\ L.I%'[Al 3 �- a• l '�11[or l � LA ram_/~=. ,1 1r I.0Y4 LIa H^I..f'1,1 S TE SECTION O �'�' t 1: 4 Ws C aj 2 �o r.1! as? �� �d • • r4l11s C7CIC7CII❑ � 0 }°° __--- -=—T itll lll��l��lll 'r 1 - 4.�1 OLEO Q 1] M(T���I i� 1�}.�Fr I .1.I,,i•LG -- 1 1 QED H •1" 0mu )I" " Mtn �'/ M 11 1 L -?A lY 1 i tag i'.W."dN — ______ m...J dt1. a.. r.99L a» SITE SECTION - 1[.m,,d. 6 0, a NMS.. SY Vt 30,.r." (0121-/' I @)Ibl-JI DECK '—'r—r ! 11 0 r-- I 7 4_ qT a.�FTtCCIan LIVING RM. —fe)u-n Ow..IA L • f-1 4 ,... .z - I=.77___ ,....) BDRM. DINING Q ..old �rmm. 3§n CARPORT )wrz! 0 u<m ti, 11� ','b 6L C✓P1aJ6.0 l ply M Ttii'PK7 W�~ 4 1 _ 1 '_ I I LAUNDRY - J OIJ K�7 u.)"1 e s -Y o Ro 1PWD - ,� `� C C — CW ',sVfW e STORAGE ?.aP✓IPrr{ DEN 117, -----K- .2._._ ( ,t r •K EXISTING MAIN FLOOR EXISTING BASEMENT ��}i�' W r1a- F'.o.r 17 Pi.. -c MO.Jcy G•,, al 511 a9J4.0 roa.lc.,.N.✓r '15+>.F- 1-q 1.�.5,A,r•w p s..: Lila: LIi ..'.1.Iq•..- sm.l;.ekl'J. ..m_WH i91 L s'..2 REVISIONS OV I 1_LO • Mill I . - - - _ . .__„— , Fr ■ el PORCHO - • DECKA � m v L�VNGRM �. -. t BDRM 3 1 W N - 1 i 4 �� •8 �. — r I 1...1...A. II I MSfTF v� �I1 `a F. -. I w rry�r -� !Y!Y__��I pI I V]m s a Ij GArw N a DIVING ,�L�TS�. I p!E } �` ;3„ -- y, Ia-.II , n H j a u t wim11 # gli, I A BDRM2 li ii u 5 - II IG CI1 1 O mm - �..I o rig CAS mi ii-----,!.lominui....../ ©�RE, l I_�_� oa I _. C STUDY ■_ • • •t" lo° • v \� -- .,� DEN SHOP d�u o , \ \, 1. l-„JINGH pi., El UPPER FLOOR - l'AAIN FLOOR BASEMENT IN li Doh,hhP, WOh 5 .r,JEr/ 1h6,.1..W!!-i1573,E.evusO;wP✓i£,R1-r4-- — 15,1.,F. W'N IN.ti.J✓r-!%oo_.;F. ���i`a rerov•-.b-,.� . ..yF1.1.56.� NI/ ; cl e D.,. 1.1 r e Jen 3 I g1 REVISIONS BY tA l G•I:10.jof o16 0 e�• § 21 1 4iv f\ tla 4 __.___ Tx rt — --- — I v �� , it • - .. • --_ I111 IIII111 -- --- - --- �i / — _ xNo y tt 1V LITt1ri:Iii_. r G ' I _ Hew N.Y p.p., ,UJhuL41 RF' ---- — -T I __ --�- , -5 I • 4. t 6-4*-4fL—— —1 —1 1 ELEVATION NOTES: 'y�� I r I - - I �I P��M�w�� I I U h - I I I � Yom low I z IMa.�ma I w F.F I ] o�.,m..�.�maMwv..�m..».� �.,. fF O....W....a I0.-12•4p 14'4_ SOUTH ,^,„,.I„,,.„.m,,,n, EAST 3l Sol ?E.1..,,..,atom.. ��xWmaw .nx ma..m • rP' c.1 - S z L _ ON.admymq.Mvdmu � log .. T. T — ,-- r ir_iMli=I 1 I I MI I I li I I I MI\ III i___I __„_ ' e � --— ---- — —---��--- � ' r'���� ��a ,�uw�nl�xnum�nnlunnnn�MM�-Willi .� —------- h I r .t I�IuIIIIGII11119�II�IIII�LIIIIIIII 11 , -.3.-_ F.F. _._ - - _�__ .4,0 FLF F-F+ 1 1,0!al L I, DI kl 1 _ 7i, - �— - ,___--.—_ __—.__-____.-_-_-_-L-_ -__ ._ 1 - - ---, a_ 0) iri=r411 I —_ JJ� ..�1 'a,4r.,f-r- 51Fwn b..," NORTH 'NEST 4 334270-0149-08 EVANS MARTIN E+KIMBERLY A . J819999 3811 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0176-04 ' LITTLEMAN VIKTORIA 1D0459 3805 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 ' • 334270-0200-04 DENNISON DAYTON P 299999 3717 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0211-01 KENDRICK JOYCE Z0579 , 3715 LK WN BLVD N RENTON WA 98055 334270-0230-08 VAN BOGART G CLARK 470254 VAN BOGART BARBARA J 3711 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0240-06 BURDICK JONATHAN R 051208 3713 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0149-08 I - EVANS MARTIN E+KIMBERLY A J819999 3611 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD 'N RENTON WA 98056 . 334270-0176-04 LITTLEMAN VIKTORIA 11)0459 3805 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 . 334270-0200-04 DENNISON DAYTON P 299999 3717 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0211-01 KENDRICK JOYCE 20579 3715 LK WN BLVD N RENTON WA 98055 334270-0230-08 . VAN BOGART G CLARK 470254 VAN BOGART BARBARA J 3711 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0240-06 BURDICK JONATHAN R 051208 ' 3713 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 - - - COMMENTS 561- 4-16k 2,5 1, 334270-0100-05 TASCA JAMES G 770834 14805 SE JONES PL RENTON WA 98058 334270-0110-03 SCHOOS GILBERT A+ALICE G 089999 3825 LK WASH BLVD N • RENTON WA 98056 334270-0125-06 SIVESIND R STANLEY + 035023 RIGGS JOYCE E 3821 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 ' ! 334270-0126-05 1 . ERIKSON BRUCE E+MARY R 959999 3815 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 • •YYV'V"h•Mti•M YY YY...ft* YYYYY•a• tY Y YMY YYY•••v. COMMENTS Vj S (�6 'I ZS Z 334270-0100-05 • TASCA JAMES G 770834 14805 SE JONES PL RENTON WA 98058 334270-0110-.03 SCHOOS GILBERT A+ALICE G 089999 3825 LK WASH BLVD N { RENTON WA 98056 334270-0125-06 SIVESIND R STANLEY + 035023 RIGGS JOYCE E 3821 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334270-0126-05 ERIKSON BRUCE E+MARY R 959999 3815 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 • 334270-0381-05 LE SELL SHIRLEY J 599800 37U8 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N 98056 • RENTON WA ' 334270-0386-00— -- • MOULIJN JOHAN P fi GEERTRUDE449999 1 3726 LAKE WASH BLVD N RENTOiN WA 98056 i • 7A2 TCO3N$ D0 , "33H3417 I E—W6SHI MTON BLVD N669 9991 RENTON WA -- 9 362916-001t305 �° 56 h KGLESAR LARRY+SUSAN �� r 'NORTH 38TH ST 8N9999 ;ti�rs;' TflN WA 9d05 6 . • ._.- 334270-0381-05 599800 LE SELL SHIRLEY J • 1 . 3708 LAKE ' WASHINGTON BLVD N 98056 RENTON 'WA 334270-LAKE toS0386-00 MOULIJN JOHAN H?BL 6 VGDEERTRUDE449999N 3726 RENTO1 WA 98056 I. • C380-pb HAMILTON £UITH p1 3714 LAKE WASHINGTQN BLVD 6699 REAiTaN W99 A N 362916-0010-05 - - 98056 -- KOLESAR LARRY+SUSAN M 8N9949 030 .'NORTH 38TH ST 1iTON WA 98056 sTE DATAI I / ""te C.. r. "... /111$ .« z"l /, .' .wt.... / .... ......./7 / lam I. t 1.r.. ..1.V / ~r Omrtrr•.H»1. -- .rrr.r. .l l I'00044.7 •...V .•.11.i•.M�• el L f '..1il.l CAI..• 1 y 1111' 'f 1 L i :I.' i i 4,,r,..,.. , /or'/ /44. ".4"" ' i ci giS "41 .....rr 3411.1.1.mobs::,..... n vaaswvc rcw2 „' :Mr P. / < .*//yy j '' . ...,•.. M.1,.....•1,r..........1.. i 4, wr. M.rrr.•u..1 u....r.. 0NJ rim*.two )L' A, cta'.� EE 4-0.1 IIIIIIIIIIINalb, ._ / y , I/ / MP 4 1r tirrtsrr fr• 1 ` ...lt... T�....•IYam,/..Irr...M111.1�.rma. 71 I' '^v ""TM U .1.1 2r.....'....f1t . ry a..MC.." $R'E IES)EI'41. y ..r..............1.......r.... a __ f+ a. / r••w�..I..r.r r.rr.�.r.l. (1] A 11 / / i.•%di wuTl.NEK..,lOf J i C 1/ 11u...AM•..l411 v —f—N...rr.r r.a�r.�a ]i - —+w.r.�r.r.r.—r•rn...•r.m.a. F -S = 4..1....•..r, SITE PLAN 4 .a NORTH 7 T 111 i i 1 v L 1 . UM .: ram . it E S'E SECTION 1'•pV 1 A� 3 Iii; ,1 It It i 1 el 0 1 C '•it 411 , F _ a n sit n , D� $��R"1 r .1,L SECTION SITE UAW•125 ME DAV, lilt,ia,1 # / crrr••..• '-;u.•r.•.... , yr r�N+ iw•n IOW s _, I, s,` J T- -' 1 Wr• iJ••. 00.4' 7 I •.•� »VW ' I 0441101 • .3... •. / 05, 11LL �••• �- L` •� ! P IrrY.. 'W -Ju cE WASHINGTON.2 , MALL i �4fp I •• rN0 O ', uw•rw rrr•>.�.•mu+...rrw. +�• h14. _1f1 L' wT an�.,� `at I/ / .T u.rw m,.• �.:. Q e / ••••••••••• Nob r IN•mdal••••• 1.••••• . • i( , I• W. r•r•r.rr•»»LL u.•••.n• I \ J .�r>rro••ow.r+•.r LTJ ww.••.n•»• I•• Imo»..••A•••.••» I•.'r r r•••w W,.t rrr 11{ �I yFll.fYfM••'� WM LEGEND. 'z Inw•Mn. >`r.•••••rw,• _ f•r »r•wrr•i•ww•..r»•Jrwwrrw• W_ rYra.l»Wirr�•=+••fir - ►iwJ /� wrr1�•••r r..»•n r /. rYW»�• Ld \W.N•W Ww.•.•••w•r•.w•..rrr.•r4rr 155 iiliA r r.•.••••r r.w r•w.r•r rr• mom... ;5 NM=�r r W r+r....�r.rr.r. rr•••r••wr•••••.r ; q j� —•--.••••••.rr.•rr.••�r••••• � ._._r.•r.•_•.••... Ii —�y�rr.rw•..rr.rrr••.•I+.rr. �j• ii / .«w....•r�. G SITE PLAN ..____ NORTH 1 'ell i,/i. i+�•• , 111 1 7U.Yt 41.Ow,.•••.I .+...as• w r / • .• ., U f S'E SECTiGN OA WII z ZZ i r W 1{. SITE SECTION dj $TDP4 ,•.Y'•0 • . LOCO 40 my ._. rs.iw . . • •'•.',.:'•:134'.:'... 29.V124WILSTAT: 1/2 '•,.. .. ... ••.: .. P;11 - — — — -- — NE CDR C161 C 012\- , ------L-- _____ A+, -- --- -- --- u --- . ..-..._ ..._.4._... _. _ ._ _ . MI -7-4-1-C1,1 .__._ I I I / i it_ cn es ri-) 1317.1_,..c4 (i) • - SIM- ---_:_-_=--- - 1 113. ili T- e4 = 1111 -- - --- '.--- 71_ •_78 .4. Lin--- es 1 • - --------1 co. - - -N—rtlf-f-- --": - 6.47 a. —1 - -- — 21"-f7 -L. T-. • —r--11 ir6- E-1 --- -/- )--- c--. _ ______ "-0--N-35-:. 1-1,7-14.-.:--6- . 1 —1 \11-1 --- 7-7.----:- 4.. 7,7. 7 ro-i3f.4,-. ,d-w-ILi .:•;. 1. i - . R C•% . .%. - 0.. , Hi i, L ,1 11.' ..R-f0 '.: ..' . —8! 1 i •§1 /- 0-""rie i; k-811Y ;J3'14131 . .11 .1 riplut81 I g_rj ‘tiiiid_4_______l_or. --Nr3. nd 1 -t-.- C-)1T-FR aq R-8 1 I I 1 I 1 i j I 1 RI-0 -C ! 10-011 11 0-10 1141 30'1 13ti l• 11-1 ' . 'TIE- --cF-',' I !ri-81 I I LI±Unol tl,,,, .• I : . T . CC •-ce- 1 li+.8; 1 I 1-17- P-3-9t1T • 1 ICC I I ' wall 4.4_L2111,1LL,H____, 'R-110 CC.I I. I- 1 1 k.1112011 i I- 1 r'"TI 4 ,,P Dt R-8T .-: I I , CC --- a -1.' 1'1 '%- 7 ?l• I I.L.R-.03-•• R-8 I 11111_ I .1, II I 11 Ho IR -8 II I 1 P. I flifr.li ri 1 I !RI-8 1111711-- r 1 ----134 \R-8 . ,1 II,,z ME I lL58 \ D4 - 5 T23N 4.5E W1/2 , a3 ,:dt 0 C"Itl ZONI,NG 114000 . C4 timooti25 ' • • P/13/PV174:111NICAL=VICO 32 T24N.:R5E W 1/2 . 4 co 12102/99 • i • • . ,",' .r . . , . .. • • •....,••• . ZONING MAP BOOK ��,'_ - ;::e-;:>;>;-;1,/_[-,III g { ,r t,r.'"v 1 i ---' � ." 1 � i •I r f V ........... -- u. - t; I T��, ,i� I 1 ->I'R� frigt I a [ ''i i t I �': ,' •MORER R�- 30 NI . r1. $24 - 1 r..• R7-..� 26T24NR E , r , 7, I ................ o,kkili m::::::=-::::;:z7::::::!,:igio-7-4.:,,. , ^+lJA'. L 44 r ------------------------- Tit, 6=--Zu, ,.�� i[�I:,,„ , r, �,, _ pik , . r,7 z..so Illifin,.-:Ku--oniz gii.,-rior.:ciii _ _ I�L -I �I 1l�'�I' '11 �Iitriitignear•F:).-VERgk. . �a�tq ,Al --.1-if"M '.i�d L`r�fl�� _ 7�24N RSE , [Milli 1 1119M":77-- .�_ :c�1 I I•:�L`2 __�'U1U`� �;,. r? := '"' ��I�� "r'` ,lr ��, 1 �' iW .2T23NR w ,Yl ITN: /_ L 1 • l`+ r- . iI 4•1 I�\ \ ��'- i t ,,� x'� .- •:.are... .11 V i14 �� ��tFAfF i 1746`fi i�k+;1 'I i'im A,�1y`r " ` r C s 1` � 00 . _' f "" • �.io- , , ' liR��lj t3 I � • i _MI ilk. rrr.IN R. 114•�i .�, `'��[�IR'I I /� .t�( ! lil i[-=) I i a `)z"LIv I 1�/1 III / 'Iasi 7,°E• 2 N-1 hit ' c,I4,RSE ZJ' x r 'I rel �� 1,111 mil/ .r' ij•iJ !!J •J. - 6' ' rho Ni p.A1.2 �=�3f0 , . �I , . I\ II'I .; 5 I `�, ,_..,.�y -- iiii L ziii I l y��w fah�►.�I� �� i�",.�'_ m ile lit '� _ �tlii� �l!lf w�lY.Gfli�'Cl1.L �!� 1• %<��a it CiYfb.='U .•E.. ;� , �1ofi I I; Ill)! 7 1�►� .,�3 5 �� p J I_ ��� / 371 81, .'�7 � y �� 7( „_ o�G 4 t, 1--,..,,, , .‘,' , tt fig [err, 4 ,,4 INt.,-1. , c ., .•-,\ . T2 N R4 �/ l.. ! i i eq �1 y T2 Ta „-�' 2 T23N R5�.[iiill� \ " 23 T23N RSE p , E'*I .�(, ! Irl i�ta�.! � u 1 ' iiom ,r� l�► ;:.a 821 e \III/ I 4 , 1I7 111 `�ij 'l ns �` 6( N R4E I % I 0� 23 J F j,11\. 1' 1 SE if�6 Z .' ' 25 I q. --_- ,\i511x ' e 9 g �%r -=tit � 1.: a 825; �, �'� 8 LC 1 �1 '-- �I -1 . ,, F :_, ev 3`--'Far 4 36 3N R4 ``1 T2 RSE, 3 �SSE, �i � R I 1 i 3N 't 'i 1 23N i 5E 35 T23N _ 36 pp�- _ 1� 7 _fir 833 7'1 IL_ • tl !1-1 rAHn®t- ill o�'." L_. , �.1•it [ �. 8 pill Int -„,-,,,,,__ivi :::::........„.. ,,,, . , ,..„ • I.22N R4E F a,N ,T1III,SR d :....._:::_:::.WA \1 h 6 T2,�I,5•,g,t�i 1 2ER-,E, A.`+1 i E "d 3 T2 R t •—• /' 2 T22N RSE KROLL RC Resource Conservation FT ConvenienceCommercial (P) Publicly Owned t'C R-1 Residential 1 du/ac I CN I Center Neighborhood* Renton City Limits I -` 1.`m_.''tb.1 f' R-5 Residential 5 du/ec FTCenter Suburban. -"' Adjacent City Limits R-8 Residential 6 du/ac I CD I Center Downtown* I • , (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/TOWN/RANGE RMH Residential Manufactured Homes ElCenter Office Residential SS Automall District A R-10 Residential 10 du/ac n Commercial Arterial I•;•;•;I Automall District H R-14 Residential 14 du/ac I CO I Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts u not shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3, H. s � Re-I Residential Multi-Family Infill I 1H I Industrial - Heavy a '41 Ell Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center I-1 Industrial - Medium PAGE an ial - 44 ,1 RH-O Residential Multt-Family UrbanbCenter•ter Public rUse Light INDEX Y 0 re i F I 1, til. . . ' 1 : !, . . . . A.. ., . . . : // litillii:11.40 fit . v, , ...,:,: . : is 1. . . • ,t , ' I le ,l atr- 4• ` 1 iii, ,0 • iit e1 r . \ fl 1') ,titft t ,1,. .',;11 . r. 11 ,' ) ,„ ii \ ,1)‘ i , 1 :‘‘'.f.t.ji = ,P.1 ', • . . .1; ' ,' 'i .i k s: 'ig fit ',' ' , ,i 4 , i(r "+ 111 4 tt yr dipUrel ; II \ 1 ' ' It il fie:Z. , , t 1:i , 11 S ,‘ • ti --\ .1 . . N , .y. . ` t I � ii ., \ fe !, ,), , 141, i ,. . • Q ....., . . . 1 , , s, .{ i ... , 1 ii. ,ci!lit ) tt ! il 1 Azilit \4.. ., ,i ‘. . . \ , , . , 1 , t1), ,,, 111 . , 4 1 ! 1 t_ r t � o ti i Ct 7 4„.4.4.,0, , -::: :...4 ilri 1.-s!,...ift r •4.r Y.. .t it 'r; Z 0. , tA. it4e4"Mt V,' • 7, ' .".-.'.''C''"*.' .4c .--,-_V;14.' 1SA ((-- M j , . •.•; .... V 4441; .-,..,„,: r.t.y, r. -7-4---... .--$. r, r-ipr efiole •.. :1,4' .• •:: ,T- ' ."' - ' - ' -:$ ' 4: ' +.-- . ' ,. I p #. _,- 4� , .='Fji' ~pr. .....\:‘it....___,_ Ll',.1.&, • / i iv � � % - _ ___. _,,,..g,- ,_.---:,,,T ,= _... .. __.„._,-.....f.. ,, •- ice �. - au • II is`lk 1 4 . X VS d.. a , I ` 1 i„- •r ✓ `r 4 , . ' . ",X..."T- s'"'44-. :-.1 , . iii, i-o•r- ''.-- t ...;' 4.• . .. ." •. f r '.• -1 ''.4vt,' t.:'' -L .. ''.• : - -••• itz.i.;.. ,, 1,'...:-14r,' '. •. *i•, . ' ' t , .1 "• .liCi ' .,'ut• .4., , . ...---... '741:•,' ... o . .1 IRININFRI r • i 0 A . • . 'W.4.4;.- • • . .%. '' -- ,. ... h._4.- , -, . • . -. - , - . •• ,;..4 , 1... ... 4 ' - . - vik",,,,,,... r4..•.i', ." . • 4..4 414A ..A 4- A ..,,, . . .. . 4 11, , , it -' - •;w ._ . R, . .. , . Ii. •1/4... .I. ... . . i II '1( .44 - . •••••• . . • '.:04". *" • • t ' . a' • , 1 , .., . i iim••.-- i:i!.' . '. • -.4. ..... , , • . . ,A •,' . - 1 -_7— 1ri ° '• , •.Nt-• P 'Ulla i - .1/'„ 4 '‘ ••••• • 4 ' 46 4.•, : • - f.. . 44./A ., .42, . . • i • I . . t \ 0- IE. ' , . S . . ‘1‘ . 0\' ar -s• .0 :. ‘1,-- . . . • - • abarmippr.- --, ill . 1 I . I ; 1 . , . - \' A ,• it e i - • k .. . . • o0 z (L) ) HM-HMe. '=.2) —HeIrMin I cn CONSULTING ENGINEERS w Q z 0 o J �0 Q w O Yz <Y Q Q GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING w O W Q CC C 0 • . • FOR THE PROPOSED w ° 6P . LINDAHL IL HOUSE REMODEL I- wvi D. Z d' m w Located at w F- cn o 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard N a o Renton, Washington (n J VJ • • • , . • a I E w 1 �. O Q w • • • ;.71- '. ' . .111114611;ii‘. 11110fN.;• Z• F. 0 ' ti - w C.. 0 I ,.__, et ill I ? Z $ w• O Z• L.I C 'u1 �1 , a.. ..... I .o r - 4.i ........4 f; , c, 0 H L i'J.v4 -Y er%,• 3,'';;'4 tit.t, 7071/7700110110.1(1Mil, . I 1141111111 minetumemita "ll (• „ 6.7 1 .qiN t �• `r'1 L' • plp • • • ~ ▪ lJQ1 J ` � Je / }yam '% . . / • ,. • rI • 1 / °• _ Ix Z co X •) •l k'.�\ .SRRQr.Y''..•:M �; ` 1 .?J v •�'4 �. 'h. t w J w OZ Z LI U Q a• P it Project Number 2516 w j m 30 July 2f?nn O O D 11 LL ci) cr) 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST • BELLEVUE • WASHINGTON • 98008 • • PHONE 425 644 1080 FAX 425-643-3429 dchemphill@msn.com PROJECT NAME LINDAHL HOUSE ADDITION PROJECT NUMBER 2516 • TRIAL NUMBER 3 DATE of TRIAL 08-03-2000 PILE LOCATION is UNDER EXISTING FOOTINGS LL + DL of BUILDING (WT) = 2000 ppf DOWN DRAG SOIL FRICTION •(fb) = 1000 psf SUPPORTING SOIL FRICTION (fg) = 3000 psf PILE END BEARING (Bp) = 8000 psf SEISMIC FACTOR (g) _ .15 DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR (SF) = 1,5 PILE PILE PILE DEPTH SURFACE FRICTION DRAG FORCE DL + LL SEISMIC TOTAL REQD SURFACE FRIC PRES FRICTION END AREA BEARING TOTAL SAFETY TOTAL SPACE DIAM CIRCUM of POOR AREA of PRESS on on PILE BLDG LOAD FORCE FORCE DEPTH of PILE ALONG SUPPORT BEARING of END SUPPORT RESISTING FACTOR LENGTH UPPER PILE in PILE in FROM BAD on PILES on PILE SUPPORT in GOOD PILE in FORCE PRESS of on END FORCE of PILE SOILS BAD SOIL BAD SOIL UPPER SOIL (lb) PILE SOILS GOOD SOIL on PILE on PILE PILE of PILE of PILE (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sf) (psf) (lb) (lb) (G) F=BLD+S (ft) (sf) (psf) (lb) (psf) (sf) (lb) (lb) (ft) . SP d C=Rd D AI=D+C fb Fb=fbiA1 BLD=WT&SP S=gtBLD +Fb Ds A2=C*Ds fg Ff=A2*fg Bp a=.79d2 B=Bp*a R SF=R+F L=D+Ds PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 2.0 in. 4 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 8,000 1,200 11,687 10.0 6.2 3,000 18,653 8,000 0.03 246 18,899 1.6 14 6 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 12,000 1,800 16,287 13.0 8.1 3,000 24,249 8,000 0.03 246 24,495 1.5 17 8 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 16,000 2,400 20,887 17.0 10.6 3,000 31,711 8,000 '0.03 246 31,957 1.5 21 10 0.20 0,62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 20,000 3,000 25,487 21.0 13.1 3,000 39,172 8,000 0.03 246 39,418 1.5 25 4 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 8,000 1,200 12,931 11.0 6.8 3,000 20,519 8,000 0.03 246 20,765 1.6 17 6 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 12,000 1,800 17,531 14.0 8.7 3,000 26,115 8,000 0.03 246 26,361 1.5 20 8 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 16,000 2,400 22,131 18.0 11.2 3,000 33,576 8,000 0.03 246 33,822 1.5 24 10 0,20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 20,000 3,000 26,731 22.0 13.7 3,000 41,037 8,000 0.03 246 41,283 1.5 28 4 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4;974 8,000 1,200 14,174 12.0 7.5 3,000 22,384 8,000 0.03 246 22,630 1.6 20 6 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 12,000 1,800 18,774 15,0 9.3 3,000 27,980 8,000 0.03 246 28,226 1.5 23 8 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 16,000 2,400 23,374 19.0 11.8 3,000 35,441 8,000 0.03 246 35,687 1.5 27 10 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 20,000 3,000 27,974 23.0 14.3 3,000 42,902 8,000 0.03 246 43,148 1.5 31 4 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 8,000 1,200 15,418 13.0 8.1 3,000 24,249 8,000 0.03 246 24,495 1.6 23 6 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 12,000 1,800 20,018 16.0 9.9 3,000 29,845 8,000 0.03 246 30,091 1.5 26 8 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 16,000 2,400 24,618 20.0 12.4 3,000 37,306 8,000 0.03 246 37,552 1.5 30 10 0.20 0.62 10.0 6,2 1,000 6,218 20,000 3,000 29,218 24.0 14.9 3,000 44,768 8,000 0.03 246 45,014 1.5 34 PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 3.0 in, 4 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 8,000 1,200 12,865 7.0 6.4 3,000 19,242 8,000 0.07 534 19,777 1.5 11 6 0.29 0,92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 12,000 1,800 17,465 10.0 9.2 3,000 27,489 8,000 0.07 534 28,023 1.6 14 8 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 16,000 2,400 22,065 12.0 11.0 3,000 32,987 8,000 0.07 534 33,521 1.5 16 10 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 .3,665 20,000 3,000 26,665 15.0 13.7 3,000 41,233 8,000 0.07 534 . 41,768 1.6 19 4 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 8,000 1,200 14,698 8.0 7.3 3,000 21,991 8,000 0.07 534 22,525 1.5 14 6 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 12,000 1,800 19,298 11.0 10,1 3,000 30,238 8,000 0.07 534 30,772 1.6 17 8 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 16,000 2,400 23,898 13.0 11.9 3,000 35,736 8,000 0.07 534 36,270 1.5 19 10 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 20,000 3,000 28,498 16,0 14.7 3,000 43,982 8,000 0.07 534 44,517 1.6 22 4 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 8,000 1,200 16,530 9.0 8.2 3,000 24,740 8,000 0.07 534 25,274 1.5 17 6 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 12,000 1,800 21,130 12.0 11.0 3,000 32,987 8,000 0.07 534 33,521 1.6 20 8 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 16,000 2,400 25,730 14.0 12.8 3,000 38,485 8,000 0.07 534 39,019 1.5. 22 10 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 20,000 3,000 30,330 17.0 15.6 3,000 46,731 8,000 0.07 534 47,266 1.6 25 • 4 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 8,000 1,200 18,363 10.0 9.2 3,000 27,489 8,000 0.07 534 28,023 1.5 20 6 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 12,000 1,800 22,963 13.0 11.9 3,000 35,736 8,000 0.07 534 36,270 1.6 23 8 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 16,000 2,400 27,563 15.0 13.7 3,000 41,233 8,000 0.07 534 41,768 1.5 25 10 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 20,000 3,000 32,163 18.0 16.5 3,000 49,480 8,000 0.07 534 50,014 1.6 28 PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 4,0 in. 4 0,38 1,18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 8,000 1,200 13,912 6.0 7.1 3,000 21,206 8,000 0.11 883 22,089 1.6 10 6 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 12,000 1,800 18,512 8.0 9.4 3,000 28,274 8,000 0.11 883 29,158 1.6 12 8 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 16,000 2,400 23,112 10.0 11.8 3,000 35,343 8,000 0.11 883 36,226 1.6 14 10 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 20,000 3,000 27,712 12,0 14.1 3,000 42,412 8,000 0.11 883 43,295 1.6 16 4' 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 8,000 1,200 , 16,269 7.0 8.2 3,000 24,740 8,000 0.11 883 25,623 1.6 13 6 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 12,000 1,800 20,869 9.0 10.6 3,000 31,809 8,000 0.11 883 32,692 1.6 15 8 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 16,000 2,400 25,469 11.0 13.0 3,000 38,877 8,000 0.11 883 39,760 1.6 17 10 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 20,000 3,000 30,069 13.0 15.3 3,000 45,946 8,000 0.11 883 46,829 1.6 19 4 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 8,000 1,200 18,625 8.0 9,4 3,000 28,274 8,000 0.11 883 29,158 1.6 16 6 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 12,000 1,800 23,225 10.0 11.8 3,000 35,343 8,000 0.11 883 36,226 1.6 18 8 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 16,000 2,400 27,825 12.0 14.1 3,000 42,412 8,000 0.11 883 43,295 1.6 20 10 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 20,000 3,000 32,425 14.0 16.5 3,000 49,480 8,000 0.11 883 50,363 1.6 22 4 0.38 1,18 10.0 11.8 1,000 11,781 8,000 1,200 20,981 9.0 10.6 3,000 31,809 8,000 0,11 883 32,692 1,6 19 6 0.38 1.18 10.0 11.8 1,000, 11,781 12,000 1,800 25,581 11.0 13.0 3,000 38,877 8,000 0,11 883 39,760 1,6 21 8 0.38 1.18 10.0 11.8 1,000 11,781 16,000 2,400 30,181 13.0 15.3 3,000 45,946 8,000 0.11 883 46,829 1,6 23 10 0.38 1.18 10.0 11.8 1,000 11,781 20,000 3,000 34,781 15.0 17.7 3,000 53,014 8,000 0.11 883 53,898 1.5 2 Project Number 2516 30 July 2000 page 1 of 5 pages CLIENT Kevin Lindahl 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard N Renton, Washington 98056 REFERENCE Proposed house addition SUBJECT Geotechnical investigation and recommendations INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to C. Hemphill of HEMPHILL present the results of a CONSULTING ENGINEERS. geotechnical investigation of the site of the proposed additional story The existing first story will be raised to the existing house located at and anchored to the existing 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard foundations, and a new second North, Renton. story will be added. The basement floor slab will be removed and The investigation and report were replaced with a. structural slab. The authorized by Kevin Lindahl, owner existing foundations will be • of the existing house, during a improved to resist lateral wind meeting on 10 July 2000 with Dale and/or seismic forces. INVESTIGATION Geologic research was conducted located uphill from the site. The by reviewing the USGS Geologic recessional outwash is generally Map of the City of Seattle. The map composed of sand and gravel that shows that the site is covered with was deposited by outflow from the beach deposits, and that melting glacier. The outflow usually recessional glacial outwash is covers glacially compacted soils. IarE-'painfi rIeX if NOTES: 1. Drawing not to scale 2. Locations and depths of soils estimated • - • • • LAKE WASHINGTON o _ BOULEVARD o oG t1C pENs G�.gcFq�S 0FtiS• • ASyONo 11Z 7- � o OU e&• '• ••. RAILROAD TRACKS o . "o - . O a . 0 . O • c . Q ACCESS - - ---- ROAD co LAKE FLOOR SLAB DECK WASHINGTON- • • 'MEDIUM DENSE'•,•• • • ' ',•, • • • • 'BEACH DEPOSITS ' HARD CLAYEY SILT (LAWTON CLAY) Project Number 2516 30 July 2000 page 2 of 5 pages A visual investigation of the ground The test pits were located at the surface, and within 2 test pits, northwest corner of the house. The verified the geologic map to be ground surface at that location is 2 accurate concerning the beach to 3 feet above the lake level, deposits. The figure on the opposite therefore the water was page shows the estimated geologic encountered at that elevation to section based on soil exposures in limit the depth of the test pits. the general vicinity, and normal Further probing revealed that the geologic sequences throughout deeper soils are gravely fine to Puget Sound. The beach deposits medium sand that exist in a would be underlain by glacial till medium dense to dense condition. and/or Lawton Clay. Glacial till and Lawton Clay were compacted by The existing foundation walls and the weight of a 3000+ foot thick footings are composed of hollow glacier that exerted 150,000 psf to concrete 8x8x16 concrete blocks. create very hard and dense soils. The lower blocks are turned 90° to The beach deposits under the create a 16 inch wide footing. existing foundations were placed by wave action prior to the lowering of An inspection of the existing Lake Washington by 11 feet in foundation walls revealed that there 1916. The beach deposits were are no cracks to-indicate differential loosely deposited by the wave settling or lateral movement. action, and then compacted by Concrete block walls are very pounding waves and down-drag of sensitive to movement, and cracks receding waves. Further would show any minor settlement, compaction might have been or damage from lateral earthquake conducted at the time of shaking, or movement from outside construction. lateral soil forces. I�rE�l�/Ir�HrIrL L Project Number 2516 30 July 2000 page 3 of 5 pages The foundations survived the 7.0 earthquakes at the site are not magnitude earthquake in 1949, and known. The underlying Lawton Clay the 6.5 magnitude earthquake in would minimize any shaking. The 1965. More recently there were 5+ lack of settlement also shows that earthquakes at Maury Island and there was no liquefaction or lateral Duvall, both within 15 miles of the sliding during any of the seismic site. The intensity of any of the events. CONCLUSIONS and DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Based on observations the existing cantilever walls, therefore the steel foundation walls and footings are reinforcing rods should be installed obviously competent to support the on the inside of the blocks to create existing vertical and lateral forces. a pinned lateral resisting wall. The There is no evidence that foundation walls will be supported reinforcing was installed, or that the at the top by the connections to the foundation walls are anchored to upper structure, and supported at the upper structure. HEMPHILL the bottom by the new floor slab to recommends that reinforcing rods be designed as a structural slab to and grout be installed into the resist kick-out at the base of the hollow spaces of the 8x8x16 wall. The resistance to sliding due concrete blocks, and that the to friction for the new floor slab can reinforcing be extended through the be based on 6 psf per inch sill plate, or bolts be inserted thickness of floor slab. through the sill plate into the concrete filled blocks. The existing foundation walls might require temporary support after the Because the existing footings have existing upper structure is limited lengths of toe and heel, then disconnected, and the existing floor the foundation walls cannot be slab is removed. PROJECT NAME LINDAHL HOUSE ADDITION • - PROJECT NUMBER 2516 TRIAL NUMBER 3 DATE of TRIAL 08-03-2000 PILE LOCATION is UNDER EXISTING FOOTINGS LL + DL of BUILDING (NT) = 2000 ppf DONN DRAG SOIL FRICTION (fb) = 1000 psf SUPPORTING SOIL FRICTION Ifg) = 3000 psf PILE END BEARING (Bp) = 8000 psf SEISMIC FACTOR (g) = .15 DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR (SF) = 1.5 PILE PILE PILE DEPTH SURFACE FRICTION DRAG FORCE DL + LL SEISMIC TOTAL REQD SURFACE FRIC PRES FRICTION END AREA BEARING TOTAL SAFETY TOTAL SPACE DIAN CIRCUN of POOR AREA of PRESS on on PILE BLDG LOAD FORCE FORCE DEPTH of PILE ALONG SUPPORT BEARING of END SUPPORT RESISTING FACTOR LENGTH UPPER PILE in PILE in FROM BAD on PILES on PILE SUPPORT in GOOD PILE in FORCE PRESS of on END FORCE of PILE SOILS BAD SOIL BAD SOIL UPPER SOIL (lb) PILE SOILS GOOD SOIL on PILE on PILE PILE of PILE of PILE (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sf) (psf) (lb) 11b) (G) P=BLD+S (ft) 1st) (psf) (lb) (psf) (sf) Ilb) (lb) (ft) SP d C=xd D A1=D'C fb Fb=fb'A1 BLD=NT'SP S=g*BLD +Fb Ds A2=C*Ds fg Ff=A2'fg Bp a=,79d' B=Bp'a R SF=R+F L=D+Ds PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 2.0 in. 4 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 8,000 1,200 11,687 10.0 6.2 3,000 18,653 8,000 0.03 246 18,899 1.6 14 6 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 12,000 1,800 16,287 13.0 8.1 3,000 24,249 8,000 0.03 246 24,495 1.5 17 8 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 16,000 2,400 20,887 17.0 10.6 3,000 31,711 8,000 0.03 246 31,957 1.5 21 10 0.20 0.62 4.0 2.5 1,000 2,487 20,000 3,000 25,487 21.0 13.1 3,000 39,172 8,000 0.03 246 39,418 1.5 25 4 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 8,000 1,200 12,931 11.0 6.8 3,000 20,519 8,000 0.03 246 20,765 1.6 17 6 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 12,000 1,800 17,531 14.0 8.7 3,000 26,115 8,000 0.03 246 26,361 1.5 20 8 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 16,000 2,400 22,131 18.0 11.2 3,000 33,576 8,000 0.03 246 33,822 1.5 24 10 0.20 0.62 6.0 3.7 1,000 3,731 20,000 3,000 26,731 22.0 13.7 3,000 41,037 8,000 0.03 246 41,283 1.5 28 4 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4;974 8,000 1,200 14,174 12.0 7.5 3,000 22,384 8,000 0.03 246 22,630 1.6 20 6 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 12,000 1,800 18,774 15.0 9.3 . 3,000 27,980 8,000 0.03 246 28,226 1.5 23 8 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 16,000 2,400 23,374 19.0 11.8 3,000 35,441 8,000 0.03 246 35,687 1.5 27 10 0.20 0.62 8.0 5.0 1,000 4,974 20,000 3,000 27,974 23.0 14.3 3,000 42,902 8,000 0.03 246 43,148 1.5 31 4 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 8,000 1,200 15,418 13.0 8.1 3,000 24,249 8,000 0.03 246 24,495 1.6 23 6 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 12,000 1,800 20,018 16.0 9.9 3,000 29,845 8,000 0.03 246 30,091 1.5 26 8 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 16,000 2,400 24,618 20.0 12.4 3,000 37,306 8,000 0.03 246 37,552 1.5 30 10 0.20 0.62 10.0 6.2 1,000 6,218 20,000 3,000 29,218 24.0 14.9 3,000 44,768 8,000 0.03 246 45,014 1.5 34 PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 3.0 in. 4 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 8,000 1,200 12,865 7.0 6.4 3,000 19,242 8,000 0.07 534 19,777 1.5 11 6 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 12,000 1,800 17,465 10.0 9.2 3,000 27,489 8,000 0.07 534 28,023 1.6 14 8 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 16,000 2,400 22,065 12.0 11.0 3,000 32,987 8,000 0.07 534 33,521 1.5 16 10 0.29 0.92 4.0 3.7 1,000 3,665 20,000 3,000 26,665 15.0 13.7 3,000 41,233 8,000 0.07 534 41,768 1.6 19 4 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 8,000 1,200 14,698 8.0 7.3 3,000 21,991 8,000 0.07 534 22,525 1.5 14 6 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 12,000 1,800 19,298 11.0 10.1 3,000 30,238 8,000 0.07 534 30,772 1.6 17 8 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 16,000 2,400 23,898 13.0 11.9 3,000 35,736 8,000 0.07 534 36,270 1.5 19 10 0.29 0.92 6.0 5.5 1,000 5,498 20,000 3,000 28,498 16.0 14.7 3,000 43,982 8,000 0.07 534 44,517 1.6 22 4 0.29 0.92 8.0 7,3 1,000 7,330 8,000 1,200 16,530 9.0 8.2 3,000 24,740 8,000 0.07 534 25,274 1.5 17 6 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 12,000 1,800 21,130 12.0 11.0 3,000 32,987 8,000 0.07 534 33,521 1.6 20 8 0.29 0.92 8.0 7.3 1,000 7,330 16,000 2,400 25,730 14.0 12.8 3,000 38,485 8,000 0.07 534 39,019 1.5 22 10 0.29 0.92 8.0 7,3 1,000 7,330 20,000 3,000 30,330 17.0 15.6 3,000 46,731 8,000 0.07 534 47,266 1,6 25 4 0.29 0.92 10.0 9,2 1,000 9,163 8,000 1,200 18,363 10.0 9.2 3,000 27,489 8,000 0.07 534 28,023 1.5 20 6 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 12,000 1,800 22,963 13.0 11.9 3,000 35,736 8,000 0.07 534 36,270 1.6 23 8 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 16,000 2,400 27,563 15.0 13.7 3,000 41,233 8,000 0.07 534 41,768 1.5 25 10 0.29 0.92 10.0 9.2 1,000 9,163 20,000 3,000 32,163 11.0 16.5 3,000 49,480 8,000 0.07 534 50,014 1.6 28 PIPE DESCRIPTION is STANDARD 4.0 in. 4 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 8,000 1,200 13,912 6.0 7.1 3,000 21,206 8,000 0.11 883 22,089 1.6 10 6 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 12,000 1,800 18,512 8.0 9.4 3,000 28,274 8,000 0.11 883 29,158 1.6 12 8 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 16,000 2,400 23,112 10.0 11.8 3,000 35,343 8,000 0.11 883 36,226 1.6 14 10 0.38 1.18 4.0 4.7 1,000 4,712 20,000 3,000 27,712 12.0 14.1 3,000 42,412 8,000 0.11 883 43,295 1.6 16 4 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 8,000 1,200 16,269 7.0 8.2 3,000 24,740 8,000 0.11 883 25,623 1.6 13 6 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 12,000 1,800 20,869 9.0 10.6 3,000 31,809 8,000 0.11 883 32,692 1.6 15 8 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 16,000 2,400 25,469 11.0 13.0 3,000 38,877 8,000 0.11 883 39,760 1.6 17 10 0.38 1.18 6.0 7.1 1,000 7,069 20,000 3,000 30,069 13.0 15.3 3,000 45,946 8,000 0.11 883 46,829 1.6 19 4 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 8,000 1,200 18,625 8.0 9.4 3,000 28,274 8,000 0.11 883 29,158 1.6 16 6 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 12,000 1,800 23,225 10,0 11.8 3,000 35,343 8,000 0.11 883 36,226 1.6 18 8 0.38 1.18 8.0 9.4 1,000 9,425 16,000 2,400 27,825 12.0 14.1 3,000 42,412 8,000 0.11 883 43,295 1.6, 20 10 0.38 1.18 8.0 9,4 1,000 9,425 20,000 3,000 32,425 14.0 16.5 3,000 49,480 8,000 0.11 883 50,363 1.6 22 4 0.38 1,18 10.0 11,8 1,000 11,781 8,000 1,200 20,981 9.0 10.6 3,000 31,809 8,000 0.11 883 32,692 1.6 19 6 0,38 1.18 10.0 11.8 1,000 11,781 12,000 1,800 25,581 11.0 13.0 3,000 38,877 8,000 0.11 883 39,760 1.6 21 8 0.38 1,18 10.0 11,8 1,000 11,781 16,000 2,400 30,181 13.0 15.3 3,000 45,946 8,000 0.11 883 46,829 1.6 23 10 0.38 1.18 10.0 11'.8 1;000 ' 11,781 20,000 3,000 34,181 15.0 17.7 3,000 53,014 8,000 0.11 883 53,898 1.5 25 • Project Number 2516 30 July 2000 page 4 of 5 pages The only accessible footings for testing are along the northwest side The design assumes that the poor of the house. HEMPHILL has upper soils will create 1000 psf of assumed that soil conditions are friction on the surface of the pile similar or better under other when the upper soil might settle inaccessible footings. After the floor during a seismic event, causing slab has been removed the other down-drag on the pipe. The pipes footings can be inspected. If the are designed to support the building bearing soils are considered to be loads, vertical building loads from inadequate then the existing seismic shaking, and down-drag footings can be underpinned with from seismic settling. pipe piles. The strong glacially compacted The chart on the opposite page soils are assumed to resist shows the required depth of pipe settlement with a friction value of piles for optional 2, 3, and 4. inch 3000 psf on the pile surface. End pipes, with 4 to 10 feet of spacing bearing is assumed to be 8000 psf, between piles, and with 4 to 10 feet but has minimal support on the of poor soils. The building loads are small end surface. The strength assumed to be 2000 ppf of footing. parameters are considered to be conservative based on past • If pipe piles are necessary, then the experience. The true strength foundation walls must be values can be tested at the time of investigated to determine the construction by conducting pull-out allowable span distance between tests or vertical load tests. the pipe piles. HrEMP HrIrL L Project Number 2516 30 July 2000 page 5 of 5 pages HEMPHILL concludes that if the construction, that there will be no recommendations in this report are risk of damage to the site or incorporated into the drawings and adjacent properties. properly conducted at the time of HE Dale C. Hemphill P.E. v o wAs A.0$' C U.—JO Registered Engineer No. 14777 o ,4;7 v State of Washington sjo ,ti46‘ EXPIRES 17 FEBRUARY 2002 } SAT �yy a°y �I 1 Vr-tic IV i Vd STATE OF WASHINGTON MAR 23 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Fippcs Northwest Regional Office, 3190- 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-50! ;<<d'-7000 March 15, 2001 I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed thereon,postage prepaid,in a receptacle for United States mail in ellingham,Washington on Lesley Nishihira ,7 i : / 2001 Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Kevin Lindahl and Becky Byus 3719 Lake Washington Blvd.N. Renton WA 98056 Dear Ms.NISHIHIRA and Applicants: • . Re: City of Renton Permit#LUA-00-125;SV,SME,ECF KEVIN LINDAHL &BECKY BYUS - Applicants Shoreline Variance Permit#2001-NW-40010 The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Shoreline Variance permit to remodel a single family residence at 3719 Lake Washington Blvd.N., including removing the existing structure down to foundation walls, constructing a new main floor and new second floor within an existing nonconforming footprint positioned within 11 feet, 8 inches of the ordinary high water mark of the 25 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark in shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington in the City of Renton. We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by the City of Renton, meets the intent of the master program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-27-170 for granting a Variance. The permit is hereby approved. This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state, or local approvals may be required. Those developments and activities authorized by the subject permit may not begin until twenty- one (21) days from the transmittal date of this approval letter, or until conclusion of any review proceeding (appeal) initiated within the twenty-one day period. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. O V iB 0 • Lesley Nishihira Kevin Lindahl & Becky.Byus March 15, 2001 Page 2 If you have any questions on the above action, please contact Marcia Geidel at (360) 407-6322. Sincerely, Jeannie Summerhays, Section Supervisor Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program JS: MG:mg VARA.DOC Enclosure THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. City of Renton PERMIT # LUA-00-125;SV,SME,ECF (ISSUING AGENCY) APPLICANT: Kevin Lindahl&Becky Byus DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT#2001-NW-40010 DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT: February 26, 2001 APPROVED X DENIED THIS CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE X_ PERMIT IS APPROVED X / DENIED BY THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90.58 RCW. DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: As conditioned by the city. DATE 3/2-0 ,2001 Jeannie Summerhays, Section upervisor r • ft CITY -F RENTON .st Hearing ExaminetOIMIND Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 20,2001 Kevin Lindahl 3719 Lake Washington Blvd.N Renton, WA 98056 RE: Lindahl Remodel LUA00-125,SV,V-H Dear Mr. Lindahl: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter,which was issued on January 30,2001,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the Development Services Division for further processing with the State. P o E. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J.Kau an Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Lesley Nishihira,Development Services Sandi Seeger,Development Services Marilyn Petersen,City Clerk •nto 19Oi oo1 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6515 C> 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer e�1 1.en'l • ::.::': : ::::'::: °GURREN....P...N1NG..d>I1/.ESI.QN................................................................................ On the2 day of -RIvuLai , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed v�e.�envelope containing Sl4oc .e�� 1c ewvu t documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing art- ddLi-Eow kek)\1/4( \-u..dk ou\I (Signature of Sender) 3 LUL(AJ -L c-=/ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sl4'1(14 ? . S-P®, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thle' uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date ta1 .! 1}}rtGG/n'lli4,o 4MARILYN VI N�ublic and for the State of Wa ' ington NOTARY PUBLIC 'IS' RILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Pr . RAEa .EifP,REB-6-"� COMMISSION EXPIRES My appoin-ment expires: JUNE 20, 2003 Project Name: LU _00 12 55v, sWtc Project Number: NOTARY2.DOC •• y= 00 CITY S.ORENTON sail am. � Planning/Building/Public Works Department"• Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 23, 2001 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue,WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-00-125;SV,SME,ECF Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on February 22, 2001. We are filing this action with the Department"of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager • Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination • cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton,Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems Applicant 19p1001 -sit r 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 cp This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 44:teuv— v I. O. CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-00-125, SV, ECF, SME DATE RECEIVED: September 22, 2000 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: October 13, 2000 DATE APPROVED: February 20, 2001 TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ ] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [X]- Variance Permit r ,.-7-) :7_7_..._..4 7 ,..... \.> c.,, N,2 ''� 32.00 ACre"sr=; - " V— 247- - -'ll y• 24 -... ',1‘, eif4Z --- - - / p :87 / I_: ‘r ,i _ •'4r •-\. - 25/.6 .$_._ / - - �- , - ,/ 22 St 9i �S P�• "" 7b.990 �1/; Pc ..o .- �Z; 4:///,, 4V 1 .ISiLE74AN D �A. — Ytrh,,,, esA,,. r • ,,• --290-- //. Q' .:"° 1 = i NO A_ 6 0 8 7p,N� l' 4 a ipe./. 19632 15 -t, 11 1S 15 20,o \Is v ,5 o�p-ip 95 _` -f7s�/ 117. 79.22 i5 20 - ' -�E, , , o s,'83� o E $ ? I EW r n 4-4 ' ..__-- ' 10 - 9 (4) s-I '� n ti _ I4I.l2 113.9 1 - - 411 /� ;a- - 251 65 -• 15 17 140° ' 160 _ -43 : i; d� V1072 „I ."..,' 37 I� A ry 4l �1 II, 9:10�,'+��/. 31 I (2) i (3) o / (1) I!' S.P. 021-64 __ 3731 --- _ I • ' ---4•7 /o,/:• g3.5t 187.3 ZSJ.7o 0 120 '75 ---,- .J4 —-�— —�tF__ ass Acc,s, -4' il k. 5_ L UA-9 Z-047-SMPL $ Z • ' 6S `•o.a .. �aG_.� 6.- i 5 I i . / S.P039-83 . L7 /1'{ _• ° u .—' d7=_ .-- l0 /__-.__-; . - , - _�25350 —/2 �'- 96.52 ..J$ I'� 0] 903 1 _ fy /� - SLN , 54 JJ0.i/ _ E2 `Rm '"Zoo " 5� °,' 302.1 1 225 ' U-1 -SS'"? S 85.6 __ : 19 ___132.1_ T95_--- 300-- - 40 a 37TH_ - - it m/ti . --- N. ;7 -_./( U - - .J 3 i 163 7 9- a S.'I 85 I 1_e c,-_i—aa tL—17i_nt._� • shsubdev . - M City of Renton P/B/PW Department Sho e Substantial Development Permit Page 2 of 3 Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: Kevin Lindahl & Becky Byus PROJECT: Lindahl Residential Remodel DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The applicants, Kevin Lindahl and Becky Byus, are proposing the remodel of their existing 1,638 square foot single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. The home currently includes a main floor and an attached 2 car tandem carport at street level, as well as a daylight basement with an adjacent covered patio. The rear yard contains a deck (18-inches above grade), which extends from the west side of the structure's foundation to the existing bulkhead. The front yard contains an on grade deck extending from the structure to the east property line. The project would involve the removal of the existing structure down to foundation walls, followed by the construction of a new main floor(884 sf, plus an addition 74 sf)and a new second floor(705.5 sf) within the current building footprint for a remodeled home totaling 2,417.5 square feet in area. Portions of the second floor would consist of a deck(main level roof)for the west 11 feet of the building. In addition, the carport roof would be raised to 9 feet and a new chimney would be constructed. Although building lot coverage would remain unchanged, the total amount of habitable area would be approximately 47% greater than the current structure. The proposal does not include any alterations to the immediate shoreline area and building alterations would not extend beyond the existing footprint. The proposal is located within the area regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program and is, therefore, subject to the development standards contained within the Shoreline Regulations. The subject site is designated as an "urban" environment under the Shoreline Program, which allows residential development provided a minimum setback of 25 feet from the ordinary high water mark is maintained. Although the existing structure is currently within 11 feet, 8 inches of the ordinary high water mark, the proposed second story addition requires approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to allow construction within the required setback area. On January 30, 2001, the Hearing Examiner issued an approval of the requested Shoreline Variance. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached SEC-TWNP-R: 31-24N-5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Lake Washington APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.L.14 Residential Development page 3-36 4-9-190.1 Shoreline Variances and Conditional Uses page 9-54 shsubdev 410• City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shore,mu Substantial Development Permit Page3of3 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. • ' • ) 1,1 „' ( 2)2, //67// reg Zim .er an,A,' inistrator Date Planning 'B ildi g: Public Works Administrator THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: September 22,2000 APPROVED: January 30, 2001 DENIED: N/A If Variance, Section(s)of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: RMC section 4-3-090.L.14.b. This Variance permit is approved by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. 2/2 g1/0 Greg Zimm r an,A inistrator DATE Planning/ uitding/ ublic Works Department cc: Attorney General's Office Applicant shsubdev • • CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITr�---- _ _ - y.,%a,a: z' 1°l ' 0 1 APPLICATION NO.: LUA-00-125, SV, ECF, SME . €42 ht:)T@, E. 0 6 2 L•IV(SF I tlf', ..IM�y P •PI DATE RECEIVED: September 22,2000 .1.H INING 1•I0 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: October 13, 2000 N•W kits i� z/I DATE APPROVED: February 20, 2001 Ci.71M ' . 6g �e4 TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ ] Substantial Development ermit i � [ ] Conditional Use Permit [X] Variance Permit N) ''_S-' 32.00• Ac re-s_7 = co .. 247 .1 24 eob `• 28 8 '' --C—'1I-5 • S �._, .1 —� �� 7; 257.E 3��.8 -_-i t .. $' ; P6 -� _0 / _-#22, ,-/ •• 3 4 " 7 , 0/,6 5 0 ` 1=1ii .0 _ �2, 4.; �v ;.ISLE?P N D �A. _ Y .F:,,, .SM,. _� _Si!�. J / _-- - ,• // ,' ,l� g 7.7r"vae u. d• is —TAT._ '_ �. Z9 - / 7 • 11 NO51"' 6 8 "7PN� I 4 • r _ s //' . 9635 15 I. 16 15 15 o is:o \is 15 :owp 85 • -_ Z � ,./fEj7 SS 1 ./ .. _ ��-// ,. - i�::.i I17. / 79.2T �$ 20 u • — -- � i0 0 3 + tp •.Y • - _ ff' o - o EIS - I w LI, 1335, i�/ n �• '41.12 3 I139 (4) s • - 411 /. ,I.• 250) e5 15 17 140= L 16o -- 4• /. • ar watt' o.^/ 311 /i r� nI 93 • �i 37 (I) I (2) C (3) o �� !''\ ��� 1 �1 Ffh _ _4$//.•• , S.P. 027-84 __�_ 373/ _ ___46 �/' 187.3 / 20 120 175 __ -..707.=i__7Ii1F-- - -,7 , /a... r13.52 / isa.x. 70 _._.._. 315 _����, I. uua 4-'„�r ' 1o,r'. k gi ] ;iLUA-97-047.SHPL •I �3,j08 i --- -- - kJ — J (I) o lzJ 81 (2) - .r �1: so• atce —esrr ° s �,/ 9 S.P•039-83 - Y• ---% /�L: ..E rA-i uvt;:_i•_✓rri 4=-`•= 70 �_" 96.9) i `5 iiBJ I;f - 253.50---- -- -- 9---,- ,, ii. r 137,flp . 8fflo Z o �O L�, 1L:l� W—,89� g--- 102.1 i 225 85.4�5:E�9I'/ -132.I��T -95== 300--__!So^tea o N37TH361i1I 63--.. r9/b . • 36 : { i 7 � JI as I " I Aa_ I os-l shsubdev • • CITE .,,F RENTON ' Hearin Examiner, Jesse Tanner,Mayor FredJ.Kaufman• • :February 20,2001: Kevin'Lindahl . :370 Lake Washington Blvd:N. : : _ Renton; WA 98056. ...RE Lindahl Remodel LUA00-125,SV;V-H Dear Mr.,Lindahl: . The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter,which was issued : on.January 30,2001,was nOt appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore this matter is considered final.by this.office and the file on your application is being = ; transmitted to the Development Services,Division:for further processing;with.the State. • Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, • . Fred J.Kau man . hearing Examiner . . ..FJ.jt. cc;•. . Lesley Nishihira,,Development Services • Sandi Seeger,Development Services Marilyn Petersen,City Clerk . ' - 1_901 2001' 1055 South`Grad :.Way`L'Renton-.Washin .. ri 98055;= 425. ':430.-651.5 o dr'contains50%fiec clad material 20°0`o .. ... :.. .. this paper Y. . r /P sCconsumet . ' lJ- - .. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 30 ay of ��, f c9( , affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a se�ecYenveloP e(s)k.cg o a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. /52 Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 3(313-day of da.61A, 2001. Cps, v► p Iv dirt, D. Igo ins ; . j • VS-- =_= 9 ; Not Public in and f the State of Washington, I, Q C O Residing at therein. o d Application, Petition, or Case No.: Lindahl Remodel LUA00-125,SV,V-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. • HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT January 30,2001 OFFICE OF'1'HE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Kevin Lindahl&Becky Byus File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Four variances from two code provisions: (1) a variance from section 4-33-090.L.14 of the Shoreline Master Program in order to construct within the setback required along shoreline areas: and(2)three variances from section 4-2-110 of the Residential-8 zone development standards in order to construct within the 20-foot front yard setback as well as within the 5- foot side yard setbacks. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 4,2001. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 9,2001, at 9:02 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site Plan Exhibit No. 4: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 5: Overlays Exhibit No.6: Photos of Site Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30,2001 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lesley Nishihira,Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicants are proposing to remodel their existing single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. The proposal would involve the removal of the existing structure down to foundation walls, followed by the construction of a new main floor and a new second floor within the current building footprint. Although building lot coverage would remain unchanged,the total amount of habitable area would be approximately 47% greater than the current structure. The proposal does not include any alternations to the immediate shoreline area and building alterations would not extend beyond the existing footprint. The subject site is designated as an"urban"environment under the City's Shoreline Master Program,which allows residential development provided a minimum setback of 25 feet is maintained from the ordinary high water mark. Although the existing structure is currently within 11 feet, 8 inches of the ordinary high water mark,the proposed remodel requires approval of a shoreline variance in order to allow construction within the shoreline setback area. Since no land clearing is proposed within the 25-foot setback area,the proposal does not require a variance from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations. In addition,variances from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8)zone are necessary for the proposed second story additions, or modifications,to the front and side yards. Under the Categorical Exemptions of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), single family homes are exempt from SEPA requirements. Therefore,Environmental Review was not conducted for the project. Ms.Nishihira described the Zoning Code Variances requested by the applicant. In addition, she stated the four criteria for Zoning Code Variances and described how the proposed construction complies with each of the four criteria, as detailed in the Staff Report. In addition,Ms.Nishihira described the Shoreline Variance requested by the applicant and explained how the project meets each of the Shoreline Variance decision criteria, as outlined in the Staff Report. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances for the Lindahl Residential Remodel, subject to the following condition: the applicant shall be required to obtain all other necessary permits and approvals for the proposed remodel(i.e., Shoreline Exemption Certificate,Building Permits, etc.). Jim Musar,Aspects,Inc., 15617—37th Avenue NE,Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 stated that he is the architect for the project. The current house was built in the 1930's as a vacation home, a very small, cabin-like structure. Mr.Musar described the deficiencies of the current structure and explained that the owner wants to construct a 3 bedroom structure to accommodate their family. The site is narrow, about 33 feet wide and only about 68 to 70 feet deep. It was determined that the best solution would be to stack the house on the current footprint,to a scale that fits the site. The lot extends about 160 feet into the water for the entire width of the lot. Ms.Nishihira clarified that 5,316 square feet of the property is underwater, and 2,314 square feet is landward of the bulkhead, for a total lot area of 7,630 square feet. Kevin Lindahl, 3719 Lake Washington Blvd.N,Renton, WA 98056 added that he is extremely sensitive to the shoreline. The proposal will utilize the existing foundation. Lifting the main floor off will allow the structural engineers to backfill the hollow cells with light cement and rebar and bring the foundation up to earthquake code. It that is not possible,the new foundation will be built within the walls, so no heavy excavating will take place on the site. Mr. Musar submitted photographs of the site,which were entered into the record as Exhibit No. 6. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:35 a.m. Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30,2001 Page 3 FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants,Kevin Lindahl and Becky Byus,filed a request for approval of variances to allow intrusions into required yards for the redevelopment of a single family residence and for approval of a variance to allow construction within 25 feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington(the rear yard setback). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Access to the subject site is by a separate roadway off of Lake Washington Blvd. The property is located on the shoreline of Lake Washington. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1804 enacted in December of 1959. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Single Family uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The subject site is zoned(R-8)which permits up to eight single family homes per acre. 9. The subject site consists of uplands east of Lake Washington as well as submerged property below the surface of the lake. The subject site is approximately 33 feet wide although the front property line runs as an angle is 36.25 feet long. The upland parcel varies between 68 and 70 feet deep. 10. The shoreline is defined by a bulkhead. There is no natural shoreline. 11. The existing home is approximately 1,638 square feet. It consists of a main floor and daylight basement. A two-car tandem carport is located on the south side of the home with a zero setback from the abutting site to the south. The applicant proposes adding a second story on top of a new first story. It would add approximately 472 feet of remodeled non-conforming space,21 feet of new structure and removal of 35 feet of non-conforming building. The second story would include approximately 157 feet of non-conforming structure. These non-conformities would be created by filling out within the existing footprint,which is itself non-conforming. 12. The existing home has an existing setback of three feet(3')from the east or front property line. It has a 3 foot,two inch north setback and the zero setback on the south noted for the carport. The R-8 zone Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30, 2001 Page 4 requires a front yard setback of 20 feet and side yard setbacks of 5 feet. The already reduced yards would not be reduced further under the applicants'proposal. 13. The City's Shoreline Master Program requires single family homes to be set back 25 feet from the shoreline of Lake Washington. The existing home is 11 feet, 8 inches from the shoreline. The proposed second story addition would intrude into the required 25 feet but not extend the existing non- conformance. 14. Non-conforming structures may not be expanded. The applicant has requested a variance to allow the expansion proposed by the remodel. The Shoreline variance requires review by the Hearing Examiner. As such,the other variances,normally reviewed administratively, require similar review. 15. There are single family homes both north and south of the subject site. 16. A review of variance applications for properties along the shoreline show variances both denied and approved. 'It appears that each variance determined the unique circumstances of each parcel vis a vis upland area and parcel width and depth. CONCLUSIONS: Front and Side Yard Variances 1. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape, topography, or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 2. The property in question consists of a lot which has limited upland areas. The imposition of the various required setbacks would limit the area for development to approximately 593 square feet. This is considered small by contemporary standards although the subject site has supported a small cabin-like home for years. A large portion of the subject site is submerged below the lake's surface. Most of the newer houses along the shoreline in this vicinity have fully exploited their limited unsubmerged area by reducing one or more setbacks to increase the footprint area. In this case,the applicant does not propose expanding the footprint but filling it out and adding a story that also intrudes into the setback but within the existing footprint. The limited upland area is a severe constraint. Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30, 2001 Page 5 3. Approval of a variance to allow a two-story home should not materially harm either the public or neighboring properties. The addition will increase the height but should not impair others' views. 4. As noted, other variances have been issued when the underlying parcels were significantly constrained by their size or shape. Granting of this variance should not create any special privilege and is not inconsistent with what has occurred on other nearby properties. 5. The variance appears to be a reasonable minimum change. There will be no expansion beyond the existing footprint although,the approval will allow the applicant to fill out that footprint in a few areas around the home. It will accommodate a reasonable, although still small home after the proposed remodel. Shoreline Variance 6. In addition to the criteria noted above, shoreline variances are subject to some additional review criteria taking into consideration the unique and fragile environment along the shoreline. Those particular criteria are: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof,that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. b. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. c. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it,the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. 7. As noted in the discussion of the setback variances,the subject site has a very limited upland area. In addition,the variance will not permit development of the property closer to the lake than exists currently. There will be no expansion of the footprint shoreward. The expansion will continue the facade up to a second story. 8. The approval will permit these applicants to remodel and modestly expand the small cottage in a fashion similar to other homes along this section of the Lake Washington shoreline. 9. The proposed plans do not appear to create any material harm. Although the second floor will extend the facade upward, it will not move the facade any closer to the shoreline. It does not appear that it will harm either the general public or adjacent,neighboring properties. Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30,2001 Page 6 10. The approval of this variance appears to permit a reasonable single family home expansion. Single family homes are permitted along the shoreline. 11. It does not appear that approving the variance will create any additional harm to the shoreline area. Approval will grant the owners of this property reasonable use of the site. DECISION: The front and side yard setbacks are approved. The City of Renton approves the variance permitting the home to be located within 10 feet of the Shoreline of Lake Washington. ORDERED THIS 30th day of January 2001. FRED J.KA MAN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of January,2001 to the parties of record: Lesley Nishihira Kevin Lindahl 1055 S Grady Way 3719 Lake Washington Blvd.N Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Jim Musar Aspects,Inc. 15617—37th Avenue NE Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of January, 2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,February 13,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This Lindahl Remodel File No.: LUA00-125,SV,V-H January 30,2001 Page 7 request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. v..134 29 T24NIR5VNU 1/2 - . .,..., --,.;,..?..„..-...',. . . .::41:-Igi;,-446, ;,,:.:,.:..:.. ,•-- ... • . - - rsalt —. - - NE3 _ ___ - - J CDR C16, — — — - — CAR . _ U w —.....-- -- --- - - / z — AT--7 / _ - - MIN` 4►, p St vi' - O _.... --- -- - ---/-=-_,..ArA. , r, a . / -_ _� III ■ ..III * I__tpa . . . .._. _______i : . , IF .:. ,____,,TR. r---N* Q _, __ ___ _________________„ ,„ OA I ---8- z - 1.�� a- 1 1 ' �� 0:„. .-. ./,-- ., -i s ).--, 1 ITY`' ��I 3� TT� — Qii--------fi /6 1 -0—tsf—azt-4,—s— x- ---if---' __, _.::::---- , , , —N--3iftp. 4 , • c%=-,) ,,,c - --.-N-133rd I . , R C• 1 __ • ,_� � jY 4 g'8 , I I I I . Ilia ' — I ( i o ` R : R-81 I 1j3id 13L .. I . ' ,113EN '_g , 1 a-� Ni-32ni ,St1 NMI mR:-8TP ;zn °a , .. 1I I a IRT8! . " 1 I R iiIiR-8U II IN 31'IL l •,. 141 R-r 8 1 ' IIH T ; o ff— Otl1 s t p CC I C C 1/23 ao RTg ! ' ' I CC I 1*flR8 R �!ivy may'St _ ri— �'7 �'`� i R-18- R-8 I III I I I I I -11: .\ RT8 i i I I i `� IP"I'! !Ill! I RI-8 —=T-R-T 8 I . _ 11 ..\! , 1 � _jIN 2lsth► . 1 ` ,- :, ` \R181 - — f D4 . 5T23NRSW1/2 . C4 o .A °` T ° ZONING 1t4800 ' P/B/Pw TECHNICAL SERVICES 4, ."r Ivozro� 32 T24N.. R5E, W 1/2 • Ila • $1 D1V410M. B1 St { ^ s for of wo.,6. Lal -[REBf.-:P EBj_--—_-_ rf 11 e________M-.._.••_. • 4100. 1 ,,T,.e!t, -,--.=..-2,-.--,__-I-,:• -FL_,---•.-1..,._;.'''., -• • . : EHI.::,1133 -i:••••-'--7-N:--iL I 0C,o 1..A4:1..‘4l ..,i "1. _______.-...__ :- .-_...c __..____- -. �. - - „1 ®®®Iv .0l_.,',..—..n„. -F1II—II1,-...l t1-i_6al--t_i r I e it: =, ._-- ---- --- .. ...... v I G cL1ai _ = . �— I E NOTES: I-- I _ I I w 3 r I I UM m.lu .nDm 11 I I I y L II ��:�a . I I w F,F II I Crnw m..o.uweu m.r 1...m DE. .i+'r.F Q Q WO. JVI g x k.DE.ruts w .w.Nw (37 • 0 D.OYIyw.wW.W tr. - 04'E a y. p D.NNwwDlw.I ll•D, EAST 1I I. SOUTH - - VIM*a�... - z „mow.... 41 .I)tcrosintlI.Eau:rw . �I O Etl.,gmc N..p.PmDr 1 1 -II MM.wwn S `I@i I...da.W.:...n.w•w..^,waw®. 5 for�F Pi awb.,, ,� wNn,l Z N NMI F.i-1'r_ .. �_� Q a.IE l.I w. .!cSlo _ ,r-„.„) `v.... m om - �r A. T ItElan—mi -, ,,,_ , ....___._ - I \- ...� __._.._— ..__.___—__.----_._—___._—.___ ... .. .. Uowulff5)IIIDI..-iuI uiwinsIEl 1(1l If — r • ® III I:dL'I;9;!,L':I,II�CLIIYII r • II OFI�FW• LNaFl+1•F.4. • . . • . = _— -- °— — • •••••. . I__ © .Iola ol- �� �.f -• --- — _ -- = ' I �',' - I , .1,,,. • . . , . .1 „ ,____. ___... ,,,. . . .,,:::$ 0 itin I 13—D MU Nil 10-- __ ____ nt F.G,1,_ IL—_ t-1i L -J I FnHN'F. pa + � Jab VW."b.Ow I..«� WEST a NORTH - D, „, 1 0 7• lx/>mH•7 nw / IIM,IOM. .t P�DA SA rt ll,dV}kd J Orr.r.r. b,rrrblr.r M7 NOBiH 1#1GHBoa • //� P.M m.flos t.M..1 6 eret /b rs rw �/ till Li[ nl..l. , SW s/Sabod.1311 at .r...rr•nl.a N •r..u.: er+.�.• tUatray.ra't d. v.a -• iSI S i ../ / ../.Afri.1 ; ' • lrt. o WS - L.t 114 51 fLf'J • -,wYer .f ▪ nUa ova/ PI-.wr Ol�.r.form rlr ol.a/�.rr.•... 1Jn . r....r.r I/.r err -LAKE WASHINGTON R ,girt',•I - , .�+�OP �� �� / 11UAia/UIDa•f4% / • Ow/^V.Ir....... ..f.a 8 !l)41se9 fy.�' C' // p / ..r/.r.. I'a.aft .Inual..rYtr • ,'.J< .'Tul•� t�J l/ '.'ry//�S 3Q` li r.r.. mr.l.r...•Ouau...r... 4144.•IA0A LI lal W ,,.,,,\a.� —� h1.41.Y11rvV germ,RI. / 11��'i 1_., k 1 r...fr/r tor:3.lr�.s/9ra....rgW error N �\ I/� • _._Ill i GIF)Z[Mo AY N , / T Q 11 nrr+.rs er�...Yr.+Me•r e�.� arm i'r1.s.. `� / // , 1.9 1....... 6..0110, _A I, -1/; m?IL, aret/b. l i�� 4r � 0.v• W ..r.rr. Ir I.r.lwrrr. _ _Lii pIflOPnw• I•H ?/Iw�II U �r^..ft fipr.lr ./11mr•//.Unla Waft.. v ` � E Zrrrmo..brruorr.nlrrrtgl.. ...rrrr.r. .....mlowndrar..r^ .— - Menal lar.wrrr+.1...r.r•1..w.r..rrr.lw•0 dn.. 1.w W/� • •///bray rr/.r.rrlrr�• -ICI B let I \\\\to 11►rrr.rrrwHrr.�Y..1=1.rwl.r ~ r rr.r:...r..a...rlr... r.a..r. ..+/.ra (�11 i s Ir..7.....I.prrlrol/.rrYr.� ....p �y 11> SOUTH NEIGHBOR .....Yrra..rYr...Y..^.r.�r ^g{ 9PI••r-S.MHn7(ak _ --f...r.ar..r.r.wrrl...p. Y_ --p--..r br...r..rrrw.p. a—h....rrr......r.rrrr/..prtar. p • Q r— ../..p rr�r F�j^. SITE PLAN 4 • III%Ie1•JI - -._.-._,_- NORTH I Y 2.1 1 $ lfii To/oh fAO t....a I 7:r STE SECTION O N 7.1,i r? E •� r U 1 _rIIII: r. WI% Pa SITE SECTION 0 II.v1./' © 0 .».. City of A . .on Department of Planning/Building/Publ i,_ JrKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po.t4-g COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. g SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The on the Lake Washington requesting approval proposed variances project would require approvaltof a hole family home Shoreline Variance in order to constructp within the 25-foot setback required from)all shorelines. gThegremainiin ng • within which are ifrom 20-foot development ont yard setback, as rds well as within the reqal—8 uired zone, foot side are yard setbacks on botch the buildand the required the north and south sides ofe temstructure.tf om the All requirement f considered horlliine Substantial Development Permier. The t. of single family home is also q Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Minor Major information Element of the impacts impacts Necessary Environment impacts impacts Necessary Environment Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Recreation Land/SPlants Utilities ' Animalshoreline Use Transportation Public Services Environmental Health Historic/Cultural N Preservation Naaturaltural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ..74-4/14_, alt, ----• M ../V11 .4'/3 VeCi laAk . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS L/71Wit aAA / 1,e) i/t7,1) la 4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS L a-171, , e71,(_ ,X 6 dilry. 7#1) 7 444 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is needed t petty assess this pro osaL Signaure of Director or Autho ed epresentative Date ( Rev.10193 Routing • ... ... Ila ja MM.. BY T--- Le.: ..4 -.1 IN f,r,erP•iticIrra• ., rirtjii ..7 6441,111, _ l'' ke.c:____Hil 01 PI JIM 12, pr il _....._- •-• ..4\.r.,, 415.111;1° • N 7 I ' _ _...-- _.. .. .._.. - =.,--. ...-L., ..••••••••--...... EB 1:4 BEI ----- i BEI -MI-r BEI Limr.... Ell' MI -1 ISEiTill v:V .,.. AN _._. ... I ____ -- , _._ ___ °) .1 II /I ..f_r------! I {' • - _ -- _._ --.1,1•,. A Z41 g4', - '-'="--= L'...1...•_' •L..L:_.1------- ------- — '__L_—__ -.1C-7' --11 ----',--- . 1.1.,14 Ai.p. • _.._ _.._ al ..,..4.,F.....,. k- ---(0 ---"--.--. I J I • I ELEVATION NOTES: , ,00`0TaKI___ 4.0 r- I I ---4 , I I c)...,.................). 0 La*db.,2.4............y........ I I I '1 -4) Z I I ......................... r4 IL ] 0 Gamma.emnammetelain....;IOe oer......o.tem I I 6-....1.I.'/A v ' L I . 0......•&,..... r!. 0........,...,.....•.,.... 0 eneselletaan...or 40 3 ii SOUTH ,0!)............ EAST — . ‘il. .701.0............son.. TO Eno...........•ernyfi.... 3 Catsheudnou % fl. gRaerc....................tol6.11.0enrudedahatimaie . ro r ko.,6... ,11,.......1..41............... 7 rz• $ LrJ.1.1 E''in _ r.d."----- 0 Pa nelaseet,la iload.. 110 Mill / Al \71 al ': r'...-..' -7-::--:.--.4n:1;:......,.7..-":......J... . •" 1 ' r 'en' -V"-"''':', --,--_..7:4-:17".1' co =-- 1 111111111.11111 .:.L, I . 1 ' '-- - ' • 133 EE1 FEI .._..... r'' - r i:MI"11111111111 .1ki . .. ._ _____ • . . • .. :,.w..............,.....iiiim. ._ . ....,,„,,,F.4.. .ri. 111111111111MINCIVIIHIlir 4 I . . • .4•IoPL-4.FA,' _ ••-• •• •—• • V 40 IlliMi 1 . -1.- -- , -• s'——- .... ••r____, I 1--.• II,D , . ri...,.=,. n ii.--..-. , . i 4• II g554/ [ r- .---- -.. _ - :.-- . i ._ 7,-- rill!" (1,) i l' 11111111.11i Wilt.-.I..1-• '?"ail!: ........„......-...--......................—.........._.........._......__,.. .... ref i it.:,,rc.1:7.0.5:,..v..N I ;‘,...,41 IIF NI' _." ..% De.-1.10'...., ....a 44 v.i. ---1.....___. .1.1E ."- i I. I' ....a...1 gr.. I L L , erAur L _J i -J Los.4i.o,3,4 leo ..•11..... NORTH , WEST 4 01 Wm. N•• • ••••••••••••••••,.. . _ '��B4''- 29• T24N;R5E W 1/2 . — —' — III7 :..:,.,tergi:.r. - - - - - - NE3 U a Tc - --- - -- .- ----ir All ir es k —_ _ - _ • - . '�� cry:410., / • -R - i �_ _ __ i'e 14 a . ► _ _L I I . II I _ -- --- ' e— _ 1=RLE3L__or 1 ..s. 17\> x -__-.=- _ _ w� I I I NE 36t _. 1 ;• . tii■1■ : 1 -/ - I I ' y I I _ __ M _ ../ -;>�I �I-i�i -��� I I -1 -T ca ___0_,4„,,,,,_ ,.... , __, - I 6 I CCD -. r . :-. ,..i- __Er I r0-11—irr, ci-4i1L-.\67-' - ' - .-i -- - A_ il-8 I I LL I R-t - `` o 1-. R 8 �; kr8 I I 3'd I" . I I I 1 I M ::' 1 -e T3-2n,1 $t to3-11 I RT8;' . I I I - -- � R IT& ....8 ao_ I I Rr8 I ;J ! I I I iiipi , R_8 ! CC I . • U I Rr8; I 7'I? 0 1 4 0 cc T I`? Rr I� 2�t�I �� `y. ! R-8 I ! R-T 1 . cc R;8- R-8 ! 4oL1i1Rá' ! I i l! ��8 j - _) L. t 11 N 28thi r �� 1 h \R-8 ' / i 7.._____!,_ . 1 iJ ' D4 . 5 T23N R5E W 1/2 �� 0®0 °~� °� ZONING 1;4800 . ,�., 32 T24N:.•115E W 1/2 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 44441 day of .itUK , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Ref,o v+ID Rom, EX,air"ikepecuments. This information was sent to: Name Representing Kev ,i v, Lw ht I (:3ec 6\11.Ls (vv, iv\usa.- _ PtSeeas.. (v, • (Signature of Sender) Sa.v14 cL it.. S��STATE OFOF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SFa- S-+2e� }- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th-)uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: C ZOO/ Notary Pubic in d for the State of Washing n Notary (PrintrArIlYkl I AMCHEFF My appointment expiresMENT EXPIRES:6-2m Project Name: Lthd 0.k‘ Remodel MARILYN KAMCHE F Project Number: NOTARY PUBL t_U Kt . sV \1—I+ STATE OF e . ► N COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 20A3 NOTARY2.DOC CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 09, 2001 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Lindahl Remodel PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-125,SV,V PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks,which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8)zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. Agnda ® „ r— . I City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 9, 2001 Project Name: Lindahl Remodel Applicant/Address: Kevin Lindahl & Becky Byus 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North Renton,WA 98056 Owner/Address: Same as applicant File Number: LUA-00-125, SV, V-H Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicants are requesting four variances from two code provisions: (1)a variance from section 4-3-090.L.14 of the Shoreline Master Program in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required along shoreline areas (site's west boundary); and (2)three variances from section 4-2-110 of the Residential—8 zone development standards in order to construct within the required 20-foot front yard setback(site's east boundary), as well as within the 5-foot side yard setbacks (site's north and south boundaries). Project Location: 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North O IQ/ e .,,. ieLUZ ,' ir„, oe s • Q� • 2_:- - ' • 8 /32.00 Acres_ ,-'°,/4, i z s ,j: _'k A . -e7 ) 27, . •" p ISLE • • . pC tli /,/ =t�tAf ..tip ZIE l 9� F 7 I C 75 _.1��' �� 111 12�1 S.Y..27]1:46 -_'-_ins ^__ 7ff p u UI ---4 616 I J' _�rl„ 1 °SP.039•B3 r , 1 to �,�f r�+-.•�9 . 37TH - F 7 o' i 4 i L 1 i 7 $j y-Is- , ,a71 na,t; Q I�q�177;%; i �y 3 Eli �,i,'f+Y 'Pi-,.,f y�: " ©©` ! �7n !was.. Pe%'�" ..4 L; n. ly N ,r d. Q ,I, 1 '.15 t3:v,l n,• s.P�we.C MIN 1H 6 Dot ,-..,rr„ I o I g N. 36TH ST. O s w ruI_,° ss sa s,tj.,,n� D. LI �t z ��I N. 35TH ST. ;�. IF N:!®larEr4I-t[:I 10.W..057. J P1 City of Renton P/B/PW Department F._.....inary Report to the Hearing Examiner LINDAHL RESIDENTIAL REMODEL LUA-00-125,SV, V-H, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 2 of 6 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Kevin Lindahl & Becky Byus 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North Renton,WA 98056 2. Zoning Designation: Residential—8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family(RSF) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Single family dwelling 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North: Single family residential East: Lake Washington Boulevard North, Single family residential South: Single family residential West: Lake Washington 6. Access: Lake Washington Boulevard North 7. Site Area: 7,630 square feet 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 1,638 sf Existing residence New Building Area: 779.5 sf Proposed second floor Total Building Area: 2,417.5 sf Proposed total building area C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Annexation N/A 1804 12/08/59 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Residential Development Standards (RMC 4-2-110) 2. Shoreline Master Program Regulations (RMC 4-3-090) 3. Property Development Standards (RMC 4-4) a. Development Guidelines and Regulations—General (RMC 4-4-030) b. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) 4. Shoreline Permits (RMC 4-9-190) 5. Variances (RMC 4-9-250) E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM: 1. Urban Environment (4-3-090.J) 2. Specific Use Regulations (4-3-090.L) 3. Residential Development(4-3-090.L.14) 4. Shoreline Variances and Conditional Uses (4-9-190.1) LINDAHLHEX City of Renton P/B/PW Department — I;-.,;;.;,inary Report to the Hearing Examiner LINDAHL RESIDENTIAL REMODEL LUA-00-125, SV, V-H,SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JANUARY 9,2001 Page 3 of 6 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicants, Kevin Lindahl and Becky Byus, are proposing the remodel of their existing 1,638 square foot single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. The home currently includes a main floor and an attached 2 car tandem carport at street level, as well as a daylight basement with an adjacent covered patio. The rear yard contains a deck (18-inches above grade),which extends from the west side of the structure's foundation to the existing bulkhead. The front yard contains an on grade deck extending from the structure to the east property line. The project would involve the removal of the existing structure down to foundation walls,followed by the construction of a new main floor(884 sf, plus an addition 74 sf)and a new second floor(705.5 sf)within the current building footprint for a remodeled home totaling 2,417.5 square feet in area. Portions of the second floor would consist of a deck(main level roof)for the west 11 feet of the building. In addition, the carport roof would be raised to 9 feet and a new chimney would be constructed. Although building lot coverage would remain unchanged, the total amount of habitable area would be approximately 47% greater than the current structure. The proposal does not include any alterations to the immediate shoreline area and building alterations would not extend beyond the existing footprint. The structure is currently established with setbacks of 11 feet, 8 inches from the west property line (rear yard); 3 feet from the east property line (front yard); 3 feet, 2 inches from the north property line (interior side yard); and, zero feet on the south property line for the existing carport(interior side yard). The structure is non-conforming on all sides. Therefore, the proposal is subject to the City's nonconforming structure regulations,which prohibit the extension or expansion of a legally established nonconforming structure unless the extension is consistent with the development standards, or a variance is obtained. The proposal is located within the area regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program and is, therefore, subject to the development standards contained within the Shoreline Regulations. The subject site is designated as an"urban"environment under the Shoreline Program,which allows residential development provided a minimum setback of 25 feet from the ordinary high water mark is maintained. Although the existing structure is currently within 11 feet, 8 inches of the ordinary high water mark, the proposed second story addition requires approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to allow construction within the required setback area. Since no land clearing is proposed within the 25-foot setback area, the proposal does not require a variance from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations. In addition, variances from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8)zone are necessary for the proposed second story additions, or modifications, to the front and side yards. The R-8 zone requires a minimum setback of 20 feet for the front yard and 5 feet for the interior side yards. Residential setback variances are typically reviewed as an Administrative process, however RMC section 4-8-080.C.2 specifies that when portions of an application require a higher level of review, the entire proposal is consolidated under the highest level of review required. In addition to being exempt from Environmental (SEPA) Review, the construction of a single family residence is also exempt from the requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With the exception of the subject shoreline variance request, the proposed residential remodel complies with pertinent shoreline development regulations. The issuance of an Exemption Certificate from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. If the variances are granted, staff recommends this requirement be made a condition of approval. Once issued, the shoreline variance decision is forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office for approval or denial. The shoreline decision is deemed to be approved within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt by these agencies unless written communication is received indicating otherwise. Appeals of the shoreline variance decision must be filed to the Shoreline Hearings Board within 30 days of issuance. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Under WAC 197-11-800, Categorical Exemptions of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), the construction, or modification, of a single family home is exempt from SEPA requirements. Therefore, Environmental (SEPA) Review was not required for the subject proposal. LINDAHLHEX City of Renton P/B/PW Department F'..,, Binary Report to the Hearing Examiner LINDAHL RESIDENTIAL REMODEL LUA-00-125,SV, V-H,SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JANUARY 9,2001 Page 4 of 6 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES N/A 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues from the proposed shoreline variance. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. H. ZONING CODE VARIANCE ANALYSIS: 1. VARIANCE DECISION REQUESTED a. The applicant has requested variances from section 4-2-110, Development Standards of the Residential—8 (R-8)zone,which requires a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet and interior side yard setbacks of 5 feet as measured from the property line to the nearest point of the structure. b. The applicant wishes to remodel, plus add a second story, to portions of an existing residential structure located within 3 feet of the front/east property line. c. The applicant also wishes to remodel, plus add a second story, to portions of the existing residential structure located within 3 feet, 2 inches of the north/side property line (site's northern boundary), as well as remodel portions of the existing structure located immediately adjacent to the south/side property line. d. The proposed construction would take place completely within the building footprint of the existing structure and would remain within the height specifications of the R-8 zone (30 feet/2 stories). With the exception of the requested variances, the proposed remodel would comply with the development standards of the R-8 zone. e. The project would include approximately 472 square feet of existing remodeled nonconforming structure area, 21 square feet of new nonconforming structure area, and the removal of 35 square feet of nonconforming area (net 458 square feet of nonconforming area). f. The project would include the construction of approximately 157 square feet of additional/new nonconforming structure area as part of the proposed second floor. g. The variance would essentially allow the applicant to remodel, as well as add to, portions of the existing structure located within the front and side yard setback areas. 2. VARIANCE DECISION CRITERIA The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant variances from the provisions of Title IV upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist (RMC 4-9-250.B.5). a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The applicant contends the strict application of the zoning code subject site precludes the ability for a suitable remodel of their home within the required setback areas. The site is limited by access and physical constraints, including a steep slope to the east and the lake to the west. Not only does the shape and size of the property present a difficulty in designing an adequately sized home, but it also minimizes the ability to use heavy equipment necessary for the below grade shoring of the foundation. The size and shape of the property can be considered to deprive the owner of rights enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity in that the potential building area would be limited to 816 LINDAHLHEX City of Renton P/B/PW Department - F %inary Report to the Hearing Examiner LINDAHL RESIDENTIAL REMODEL LUA-00-125,SV, V-H, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JANUARY 9,2001 Page 5 of 6 square feet when made to comply with all 4 setbacks. This would be significantly smaller than many of the surrounding homes enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The setback limitations would result in the design of a square and massive structure, as opposed to a long and narrow building as currently designed. Not only would the lake be more visible from the public road way with the proposed plans, but would be compatible and in scale with the character of the residences in the surrounding neighborhood. A square and massive structure would not only be obtrusive and out of scale with the neighborhood, but would also potentially block views of the lake from public rights-of-way. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. In its current condition, the structure contains inadequate foundation walls, as well as substandard heating, plumbing, and electrical systems. The proposed remodel of the structure would bring the home up to current building and safety codes, thereby improving the public welfare and benefiting the improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. The proposed residence would be in keeping the existing character and scale of the surrounding residences, many of which are larger in size and nonconformity. d. That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. After reviewing several options, the applicant has determined that the proposed design is the minimum necessary to accomplish the desired purpose. By maintaining the existing footprint, replacing the existing main floor, and adding a partial second floor, they have brought the house up to current codes,while doubling the usable square footage and improving the visual quality of the house. The approval of the variances for the front and side yard setbacks for the proposed residential remodel would be the minimum variances in order to allow the applicant to remodel the existing home in a feasible manner. By maintaining the original building footprint, the approval of the reduced setbacks would not substantially increase the nonconformity of the existing structure in a way that would detrimentally affect adjacent properties. I. SHORELINE VARIANCE ANALYSIS: 1. VARIANCE DECISION REQUESTED a. The applicant has requested a variance from section 4-3-090.L.14 of the Shoreline Master Program Regulations,which require a minimum setback of 25 feet from the ordinary high water mark when constructing residential structures. b. The applicant wishes to remodel an existing single family residence located within 11 feet, 8-inches of the ordinary high water mark of the Lake Washington shoreline. c. The project would include the remodel of approximately 180 square feet of nonconforming structure area on the main floor. The rooftop area of this portion of the main floor would be utilized as a deck. The second floor addition would not extend into the required setback area. d. The proposed construction would take place completely within the building footprint of the existing structure and would remain within the height specifications of the R-8 zone(35 feet/2 stories). e. The variance would essentially allow the applicant to remodel portions of the existing structure that are located within the shoreline setback area. 2. VARIANCE DECISION CRITERIA The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant variances in the administration of the Renton Shoreline Master Program upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist(RMC 4-9-190.1.4). LINDAHLHEX City of Renton P/B/PW Department I—,,,i;inary Report to the Hearing Examiner. LINDAHL RESIDENTIAL REMODEL LUA-00-125,SV, V-H, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JANUARY 9,2001 Page 6 of 6 a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property or to the intended use thereof, that does not apply generally to other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. The land area of the subject parcel is unusual in that it is smaller and narrower than parcels in the immediate area. The applicant contends that the shape and size of the property, coupled with access constraints and the limitations posed by the lake, unjustly restricts the building pad size and shape for the home. b. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. The requested variance would allow the applicant to construct a home that would be similar or lesser in scale to the homes immediately adjacent, as well as throughout the vicinity of the subject site. Furthermore, the area in which the site is located is an older, established neighborhood consisting of smaller, narrow lots. Although at one time many of these lots were constructed with smaller and older homes, today's housing market has driven a demand for remodeling and/or reconstructing these homes to create modern and efficient housing. By virtue of the site's inclusion within an area associated with higher property values along with small, constrained lots, the applicant's restriction to remodeling within the required setback areas, as opposed to building within the existing footprint, can be considered a deprivation of the rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners within the immediate area under identical zone classification. c. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. The proposed variance would not damage the public welfare or injure adjacent properties, as the reduced setback would not impact a natural beach area, or public access point. Remodeling and adding to portions of the existing building footprint within the setback areas would not result in a detrimental impact or injury to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity, especially when considering the existing setbacks of the structure and the size and location of the adjacent residences. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. The Shoreline Master Program encourages uses along the shoreline that are not view obstructing, that do not disturb the community, and that have an appropriate design. The applicant's proposal would meet the"use compatibility and aesthetic effects" portion of the shoreline master program. The approval of the variance would not conflict with the general purpose of the Shoreline Master Program. e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved;if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. When considering the present development of the site, the approval of the variance would not inflict harm to the area and would not infringe on public welfare and interest. The approval of the variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Master Program. J. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested variances for the Lindahl Residential Remodel, Project File No. LUA-00-125, SV,V-H,SME subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall be required to obtain all other necessary permits and approvals for the proposed remodel (i.e., Shoreline Exemption Certificate, Building Permits, etc.). EXPIRATION PERIODS: Variance Approvals: Two (2) years from the approval date, if construction has not commenced. LINDAHLHEX City of Rent )epartment of Planning/Building/Public We ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: lSp(DA41,0111 COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira , PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North .• SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. 5, * '"..., %Is�� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to rem pi an exis g {'. single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would requir a ovf a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The re setbacks,which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being request-Jrorder to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A0 GovArNeAlA5• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. D Il �• AN IQ aDVO Sig at a of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rent _lepartment of Planning/Building/Public Wa, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S , USici— COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira t•;.._ PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 ?� • : rly� LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North /, '1. SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. ', c l;1Il4 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodef�w .existin&' -, single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require ap•`' tVgjiof a ,.8 Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaini , setbacks,which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in o I4r o build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both' e north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. °‘ 41;ik') \0)1131176-0 Sign t of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton, apartment of Planning/Building/Public Wort. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Roxi ReUIPIJ) — J G:5 COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF WW1.'" Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl WORK ORDER NO: 78740 �"" PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence C , IU(i LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f.tiva I.sawaL.Liiiv...4 ,,,,NA an SUMMARY OF PROP on thapplicants Lake Washin ton shoreliine.oAs proposed,rthe project would requireeapprovaltof a g single family home located _ Shoreline w arelfr orderom the to construct development stands ds of the setback required from R 8 zone,are Tre remainingst order to setbacks,whichp q d�) being build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within eby the required Hearing Exami�nedr.The construction ns on both the of north and south sides of the structure. All variances will b e family proposal also requires issuancerofa Certificate of Exemption from the Substantial Mast Master Program. Therefore,the prop A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Element ofe the information Environment Impactsn Impacts Necessary Environment ImpactsMinar Major pa Impacts Necessary Housing A Aesthetics Air r Light/GlareWanes Recreation Plants Utilities Land/Shoreline Use Transportation AnimalsPublic Services Environmental Health Historic/Cultural NaturalEnergy Resources Preservation Natural Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet CITY OF REIN • gyre-,... 1)CT 16 2O0t B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS BUILDlN'li U V ioI�M C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No Ober :w . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information i neededn to properly assess this proposal. /0 j / `i 1to Date 10193 Si t re of Director or Authorized Representative Rev. Routi r City of Ren Department of Planning/Building/Public W ENVIRONMENTAL & DEvELOPMENT APPLICATIL .. REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:T1y-e lie f -0 V COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/07 ECEOVE APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Mira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 OCT 1 3 2000 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. CITY OF RENTON FtFi DENAftIMENf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order ro remocteten existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining • setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 10A - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS - C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /f We have r•viewed this applic .y with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad. ionalinformation%ff r--eded to properly assess this proposal. 1,44441e I ay/o/d, Sign:tur of Director orAuthkrize. "-epresentative Date Routi • / Rev.10/93 ' City of Rento..-..Jpa►tment of Planning/Building/Public Won , ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: avNoVm tc, De,uctor COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira MP.- •."` PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North OCT f 3 '''i o BUILDING AREA ross : 2989 s.f. ' ',,-,--• vi-,r.... SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. ANL)sr-A"''':Y1),)vs �- SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remo NNING single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed,the project would require approval o a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks,which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Impacts Impacts Necessary ation Environment Minor Impacts Impacts Necor essary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS NO Poc-.�,( I ssL) . M.ir-r t___€ -z,sz,, p -,0u I, • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where -•:Ilona rn o ,_-.• 's needed to properly assess this proposal. /C/G1v J Signature 'irector gr Authorized Representative Date Rev.10/93 Routing ilding/ City of Renton uepartment of Planning PP L I C AuI T I O N REVIEW SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT A REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: w, o-0 SE'a'VICi6 COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H PROJECT MANAGER: Lesle Nishihira i.:,.,., APPLICANT: Beck Bus&Kevin Lindahl 0/�,;;.4 jvT WORK ORDER NO: 78740 4�c r,,,i PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence , LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washin ton Blvd North N BUILDING AREA toss : 2989 s.f. `gap i , SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. p of approval of SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Thethe Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, project twou d require exl Shorelinehole family homea locorde on 25-foot which are in orderto evelo development stands s of the Residentialire8 (d from 8 zone,arenTre uestediingorder to etbacks,which from the p qq d) being required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as witdered b ethue Hearing Examinedr. The construs on bfiontof builde and the q north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be cons) it. ee family a isexempt lso issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Substantial Master Program. Therefore,the proposal also requires A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Probable Probable More Element of the oemation Element af the Min Probable Majororble MoreInfo Environment Minornru Majorcts Necessary Impactsar Impacts Necessary y Environment Impacts Necessary Im-- IZEIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIII Housln• WIMOININIIIMIMMIIIII.1.11 •112M11111111.1.1111 --- -- Recreation -- laT177Th Land/Shoreline -== Trans.•rtation == --- Public Services -- gy/Environmental Health -__ Historic/Cultural Energy/ Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment Mill10,000 Feet - 14,000 Feet 111111 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS EIJC. IN g.ING i2�cauc� � �-�-��L-�(, 4(� ��S w /N►O 0 r-J L,J c_L F o 12 (8 0 ram,oo c- We have reviewed this application with particular attention thoseo areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properlyassess this / 6a Date Rev.10l93 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Routing ' City of Rento.. -_:.,apartment of Planning/Building/Public Wori ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po Aas ,COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. p g siSUMMARY family home PROPOSAL: ocated on the Lakel Washington requesting approval of four project would require a Shorelineho Variance Variance in order to constructp within the 25-foot setback required from )all shorelines. gThe remainiin ng • setbacks, required u red 20 f of front yard setback, as well s wt Residentialh required zone, side yard setbacks on bothethe build within theqqbe north and south sides of xempt from the City's requirements ments fconsidered r a Shoreline the ubstant al Development Permit. of ee family homesP Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Element of theMinor Major Information Environment Impacts Impacts Necessarycon Environment Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Housing Ear Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Recreation Plants Utilities Land/Shoreline Use Transportation Animals Public Services Environmental Health Historic/Cultural Energy/ Preservation Natural Resources Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS L/71,4'1 6IAA 1/1,0 i/(71° S0 16 fev24 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS LV-171, - °Va.. ,1v 7t) 7 444 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio a!information is needed t perly assess this pro osal. / Signa ure of Director or Author ed epresentative Date ` Rev.10/93 Routing I I • I 1 �)a+o R1'1 AN, / uw our Ill 114 SW1. II WE DATA .-, ._ . 'I� �i c' OATH rfioe i p o.�r.... ni u.r cwf Pvr 1 • N / : ... �`��771/11\ d.Y....11 LL \ a. f....OYIb-f1I{.[ , 7.---... m] C114'.l FwcL �' 3., .1d..1.v.: �. .1.11.ti..ra9�. n1.c - t 11.'A1 r / �� rl I ., 'r\�, 11...°-�•rur3a I.. :v:i 0 ila1.51 I I. Mu,.w O' �f. • ....r.r•1a.t m.., Ma. 1w:.1 V `!1'! I��, d�� �'-7h:ifW7'�"_�rG - !� • �.i 1r(91 unf.tm/ :`,. ilt di I 1, JJ11 �Il►g� a ° tell n` 4,101 r0 //// • `,-0. ,. LAKE WASHINGTON7 R 'up)Ww VOAHLRESI, y i. a.rwn+aw..-a..1 1n .1 4 "0.,f •13 els�L—'+' .S3-c ::.J{r' / / -n' :'! • .-t...-') // • \\71 4.3, r.e.. vmar.s.a-ffu.lirr.l.p Ii.l1.YI1'.X' / fill*,,, / i-' Y .....0.4r. 1VP.�..r L....L.C......a 1.• r/ T�,,�����i�I �^ j ,/ "�`�, �w�e--r, Ill ' AA Di Ij1Ar`^.r" :, fir ! r /-/ ----— i f.YS ...P1'tr. f.1.rl. .,:1' T1 �F1'�1 , ,.i..1°✓• W wm r.uu•r i v• COP.w l.,v:.6r. ;i'f. :tea ma. r4 M...e...L Im Ir....1lL..d.m• 71, , al LN..I.A=.1/R rj �Rta.f '�EIE LEGEND: f-' ..r1.a..mu............ ... • �:.. ......1r.. ....+.....1ra... .c.1r.,erwl.r.ml.wmi....e..d..r.o.d- A SOUTH NEIGHBOR rJ, _,�µ.......d.l4........p, +3 3pl..t-S.Mrnt Go; - —1�Am.......d.....I....... B SITE PLAN Q NORTH • Irl 1vI o1l 3t�� • ;d.f,��or d 3r l� Jf�,^O.Ar I ` 't1lld .n'.• S S'TE SECTION • 0I"•�1�1 $ : d t A ' � g;4 1 it �; rf� 4. q�41 I . a I ( III: /may n Za 41- I DO 1J/ i :II L --T—rf3 , .' I •I:,.I,r 1.r m --�-1 I� �fTlDo f ' ofTlo "' rmnn�� -.-- r� �� ( ill o-. 11'.;.' . A. R11. Ill SITE SECTION © L If.fo'•d' ll1OrIOMI Sy I e. AIL, (f)Id•�I 1 / • / DE K , ,.., - —.--, ---.,-- I . i I T—"---- 1. ._ 1 ---Ji ' C 1 1 �'F+, - '` - L9M LIVING RM. '(1 W""�""° t J_T ` lntWus✓D.PtM..�J I V J w we II I w • SDRM ipININQ (rilQW�mA� 3 .....i i• /\a/\ CARPORTll ;)la ua:n " Q ., ��Iw f$ f=412 � _ IIT _ A I I I Q I At!NOR'( FM • IL__ LJ VU t . ++ Q Nu WI bib Wilk DR I - _` 9. ' . • w -9 16.7;X NOW e lit STORAGE ` ofI1, -01 , M Ili EXISTING MAIN FLOOR EXISTING BASEMENT NI ' �)n,1.1 F✓•�-to pl.un �w � q u6..... . • - - �- ,>* R Ii. . .a*•P•r. _ + . e21 11( Ddb 7 ov 4 fr1 -'uw 1,,,,s..4,-i-Pr git II 40 ...1•In•r • aw.l k'll'J' c....J.t1 x. .111- REVISIONS BY • I . ..' ---•-=.----..=--. .1 lir: j t.)r, F'ORCH Lr--- - . , IA,..1... rt) 0 --.- —• p,E.C1=.< -.-. 'In . — 1__UNGRM , 1 . ii,„,...,,.. I I 111.1.M. IBM 111 ll I ' I ..1, i',4..k•._ , I W, Olt 11 1 V I I i . . •c7.1.1 g; ,71 I LI 1 IW•1"- ""'" 1:- I - ik .a.::•,-‘1 . I 244,2A 4 1 L z P- ,,-,'-' 1111 i°444, lli I i 1111111 I 44 In ill 4. • a I L ‘ 1 . • BDRM 2 e , r , ,,,..a..,, --,,, — 2 __ ---,, 1 --., -3 S Mai ; 1 'l 7:141 1 1 1. ,1 I. .1. I 1 7 — • L P,..1Lur, in 7.... .,,...__.z.Thi2, __, ...ilik 1 LT.14 0 • , . . . , 12,1 _. • r--I 0 mon El L.. ____, • *Z. LA PRI - -1 P,113 — ,—....-,— 11•1•YEr-e, ri, -: 01 - 1-F* . I , 1 ki,-____„-_ mi _, -Trc-90—-i E i _ _" -3,1 • ,„: , ,. STUDY / _ in . SHOP 1. -A. 11 -..-1.9 , . 3 .,..,7- ,IN II DEN 1 i 3 11 tie..1.4. !. t. , •-i.? a ''''-41 111 I 16.2;77. 1 t* N. N,'--11- ,,JPPM F L_OCR , F n AIN FLOOR BASEMENT mlii••! -1:a,01:•kyki f.,ss .r.QE•clo- -1,/ nf.14,-ri 4.51.5it-ev&Ko-..,46f.l'i E,1--E-44--7 -1''t,P. 1 il I1.1. -ren..i... ••0•••••• ../..,,A.2,4.11f.: 41i "i Ota....1011 ma a ••••••••••••er.••• . REVISIONS EV t • 1W,F,1.4106.6... 1 . ff ,‘ '•',ief MI _11._,.t .....•. _. •_. -4, ip..4„, d; l° i 0 Lg.. • --- -..-.. FE f' EB .-' . . - EB • ' .----11: r- r-----:-• __. 41 ---`-'17.2-17z._DJ __ mi -4'. la t -1ISTITY-111 7..1____ __WI 11 I 11 . .-- --7.*___--= _. il 0 El 1 j_ '7N 2.0 441-ttf; — ---.---• - • . -'-,- -.----• -- ---- •- - ----------- t _-_-_-! al OD — -— -1 ----- - i . _..,,,• _._ . 1 11111 FA n.. 1 ...„ .. ...k„I 4:-1 i 11114 64)4f.,h.,, 4 •-- 1 I ,......5 I I • ---I II II 1 ELEVATION NOTES: 010 a taxll Icatrneam.. 0 Extetdonao r.O.?WT.,.0. • 0 am a....areu....u.omte mull;........rn. 0 .1.07 I L 1 I L. I I 1 1 -..% etni 4'P.P. 8 r.4 C...) 41 CZ)' C/D 1 h Igg .. 0..........,. ..,.• SOUTH 0 4-44emsan,,42 t IP_ • (i.)Vir..1*0•11Is a EAST 1 fj.)......d.... Nil 50...tn.....remam • If..! TO Dann...0..M..'. r.I .. •t4 N. I ID...444u @ Mal duck cma 1..rtee.t.36,0 ertaarausaa 1 4 ta. •z ., , i 17,---40 parbrul ®Plyatof N.Ilytordwaliad Wu of ,,, im v; 0.44.4=.14. / \: - MI =::k ..„),,. _-.,--.: -=-,-- i IMIIMM.111 1 ''' -0,go ,-, ,--- ! • , , . -- . I, ,..:__ - ..-, .,_-,-....___-(5 1 i 1 4N ; ' 14'. - ,...,.7 . 1 ... .,11imiiiitionimunienemtiIII,_ - A -- --- _____ _ .________________ ..._.. .. t.....a,:•u.e- ..,,. Y1--fi 1- i 1 I I iinfitiliiiiiiiniiiiiifiiiis i .111--,..-- . ... ‘4..ppio..4 P.P_ __ ._. .... •••• •• •-• • • - • - t IIMI - • ..... , - - I '-'-- -, •IMMIIMIM I nil- MOMIII ! tcs . g5,1 3- • • i "oil „I .—_ _ 1.141.1 RI-FA -- •_ •------.--•-- 1 ; - F.,.111,u___ on 101,....1_",,,t.:,..„.::41,,x,:.1...,...,•:,...:. .....,, _,„,.,,,„_,.,..„, ...„.11 ,1 , -, ..-.7 ---.7..: .. _,, ,,,,,_:..7..:,..2_,.• - •• ii 1 MIMI _ ,e)CbrrAT f.k t I fr,r1.41-gee) __J d •L _J 5,Nell e...e, .. 6•91. al... NORTH WEST 4 01 Ons. -._ • %,-:f29V1'2410R5W.W.-1/2 '''ii:' • .:‘ - ' ' .::: . ie- . ___ _ _ _ _ - - . • - - - - -- - - - NE 3 - - - -- - --- --- --- CDR C 161 - ---- --- - --- CDR ----4--- -- -- -- - - - - ' z _____ of - -- -/---- , 4 til St 7 _fiej?1 -`o co -- •fi — ---n-- .:`, _ ._____:—_-.1— —1,711 --- (—(1- - C--- -- R 7-8-- -- -S17-r - i-7-.1- gMl -113; ' - Is-sir IN I's\ .. _._. __ _____ • . L- -Iir z_ II IN zi 1 `1 r e: c,c) co .\.>•- • 41 - -- --- ----- -(7-, Tr N -Nri-L•4-11ff ,1*-8L-0. 84 --1 R -- --- f_-_-_-_-_-_----i 1 / . imitorm --f-- ,,_ • IlIl _ mulindal IN NEI 36t ir6- mum= E1---11-H-0-1\har071l1Siltl-i 1...t-- -bJ-,1I 7—,FI 1.!---.•I ( \ _ - ; j11 1 i - - i. - 4 _ __ ? r 1VO - - E ri l RC2 --- 11 I I I „IT 1), I ,I gil I I R-01 • a. ' ci -.I, R-i0 frg IR-131 1'1' IL 'IlL1 l''' 1111111 F i I -- ' ( r/o, ,„8 ii . ut Rfc- latpR-----87-randkt- , ,,--1-,-, II I _ L igH 81H HI i iiiiRhei 13, 7Q[__ .__ celi10_011 Il _114I 311Lpi _cvliR;-81 1 ix I 4131r_10Gth L, R-0 I 1 1 lc c 1 - -: I R+.8! u . ,k_40 1 cc 1 1 T 1 IR R+.0 14 ;ef:__ io cc' i I I [Ik,41. et*,41 ex -8 /t-f! PL R , jou R-8 I LIII LI I II III -1- %\ • R+8 i 1 i I i PI i (4-li illi i IR1-0 ---7JF-13: 8 r-- 13a3.-N - ' . 1 .q-ep 1 1 N 28thl §t i ,--- \ I--' ._. _A/ z1 "- ,.: --8 —1— -7---A•777,. - \\ \R-8 1 ' l,-,‘- \ I ==-_7--—1 '\ --- \ D4 • 5 T23N R.,.5E W 1/2 ZONING ,? ?3 ,: io 1,4f.,00 . • C4 , cm,matvicEs ;.• -., : ;:--- 32 T24Ns,:,R5E W 1/2 NO ,,to 12/02/99 ' '','.;,! 5:::,.''•: ,Y;;,1A1;';;:,, ..; , : . t [':':: ''',''':'1%.'1;';'':!''::' • BONING MAP BAK ' -77-- -e(.:.:SEREV.--.,:::.my--"-!,._,' '5-- ------1—', ::' 4-A--6E-::-:' of , ', .;q I/f-• —---- • ' '- .4,1:\ '' ��� ,>..vII Ili` - . I l, r- i1' rx„� 26T24N!R5E C - - R- I s9 J.r -- s I `464 ,,,_,,,,„ \. 1:;?.:•ZE:Eiiiii: I - • ' c 7 - I, -- = - � -=�'.,j Tal. i►�,, �..,�-��-, ,,„,-,•:„,,,,,,.,,,„,,,,„„„„„,„:„.:,,---":::::::::0 in,...KiK'.:;:::": :.E9:A '2 i ..,...,,,,„.„,„„„,.„,,,,„,„ . is • __L 24 J 4-02'>34 I >_y<�f.iris m�; ► . v �� 4 R5E 1 NIIA, 1 iI }� - , •'-::::---�------- - -- - .d 1� �•�`L.��• - _ �Tit N ii 'liertim „"'7 10,111p.4r,miek,...,;11.1,0",,-:.:111, I i.I �it•- I,„„ it � I:'a JIB-r•,,p �� �' - A�� a�'�(I.Q6 , s`�` J .y Mil a5i \�.. 1V1I 'hYar` I.i 'J I - ,2 T23N R • ,,j4iMplik Oa.., 1 ml. liu. 'r - ilaI r rl 141l �F�IS i?i �,`,/• 'f .L,`▪ ;ari...._ 1A_y iti Ai n rl� �e 51 fi l. • 1�II I•l 71 I ILI T=1 ' j .: ,_ . , .' ' � 1��L4�'ILa:. I \ h itI _ /,k l ,..4 ,^E. N 7_�• 11 -;2b, a.--i/1'�f.171t/ \I gliit �� ,. %3/p '® p ' Hi`' •,P� l4�a� f CVO r1 1. ill/l i. 1%)y� • ¢ 4 yr��a ,1Lrt(�j���, //�1 Ei•i. ►� Ire U Di lip #III+_.`T �'t �,I} I1�il'/'.`. "�'�,• !„„, ,,,,, '_v.- • iv Y \u .�v ( ` IIIII111'21 &�iE'' /�—�! � .t -, _ ,, d aJ j t k ,,zio;irAtu,IL-.ch.t; WiTL'. • 1• •'iri N L Om-4' r6E•' J�yptl 11.111\ v01 .�3 5 '1 I •',-,11,r 5�19,r ,_ 371 81, 8 7 i ' � � -"iS,'7'!'••.•'' _ liti - 1117."-*'':' . '4." � � 1w��,1 s ��j�I ' � t-N..22,4,..4„,!,. avf i . T2 N - 1Lc7;�iSij 1 IK`t trAll 1►T2 R 1 � _ 1Ropr _ �—AO _ , 22 T23N R5H y 23 T23N R5E �-, - ,gym 11 ';f �l u ;111 •��`' : T ' r 821 .:,,'. : , 26 j Wki72.i' . i, i ; `riw�' •glut- °I.4 `*t fir,„ �• of . 1 1I E ° 26 0 i. •__ I.k 511 r .0-;• "T1 LJ •: 4. 82511 ; $ ,<� 1 1 : '_ I,/ ill irk " r,,-. .' �P,NI 1 . Mr r-gli. i, v ""--ra `.; 7-' 36 �3N R' -�� ' I� � � I _:� I �. r3N R: , , . i 5E 35 T23N; i i• _ 1 61� gp, 1 ►� •/�I _ .Wit \ art'Mf _, 833 = >-1 E,„,,„„„„,:,,,...:., FF .�II �;tIP:i 1 �, 22N R4E 1' ,, . - 6 T2. ; IFk- A IL .,� .o r' it ,l ▪ -.. . � R ._. i 2 T22N R5E . KROLL RC I Resource Conservation I CC I Convenience Commercial ca) Publicly Owned tj a ,-.,,1-;_ I R-1 I Residential 1 du/ac n Center Neighborhood* Renton City Limits I •I.•`' 'L.N. I R-5 I Residential 6 du/ac n Center Suburban* -'-'-'- Adjacent City Limits 71 Center Downtown* ' °• , (Grey Text) Prezones IR-e I Residential B du/ac SECT/TOWN/RANGE lRMH I Residential Manufactured Homes Center Office Residential 52;; Automall District A •' Residential 10 du/ac r—i Commercial Arterial I•:•;•;} Automall District B I R-14 I Residential 14 du/ac I—I Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts not shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. 3 I RP-Il Residential Multi-Family Infill I-1 Industrial - Heavy ra W IRM-NI Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center ED Industrial - Medium PAGE 4 ' IRH-CI Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center IL Industrial - Light Y INDEX ,a j Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* I-I Public Use Y a 0 w S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January 9, 2001 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petition: LINDAHL REMODEL LUA-00-125,SV,V Approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. Location: 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Questions should be directed to Hearing Examiner, 425-430-6515. Publication Date: December 31, 2000 Account No. 51067 HEX Publication Notice CITY)F RENTON ..t� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner;Mayor. Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 21, 2000 Kevin Lindahl Becky Byus 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North • Renton, WA 98056 , SUBJECT: Lindahl Remodel Project No. LUA-00-125,SV,V-H,SME . Dear Mr. Lindahl and Ms. Byus, The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has been notified by the Hearing Examiner's office that the public hearing scheduled for the project referenced above has been rescheduled. A Public Hearing will now be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the. seventh ;floor:of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January`2, 2001 :'at '9:00 AM to consider the proposed Variances. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you,one week before the hearing. If appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this.public hearing. I apologize for any inconvenience this may.cause. Please contact me,at (425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lesley Nishi Project Manager • cc:, Jim Musar, Aspects, Inc. • • rxc1' d . - ' 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,'Washington 98055_ City of Renion Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1U`«, COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single.family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ✓ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 7)1 l� Lrn1O e/ t'ln U6mivi( . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or horized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: aoNoVN peuei wu OMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira g"'`.,-_"`"" PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North OCT f , SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. 6`'J"'` o[vr_,r-. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remo Ni,iNG single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval o a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1\3`0 1�v�-1 LY l SSUL� • c_ FL u C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where .•Jr ona In o_, .;'• 's needed to properly assess this proposal. _I..PA - -- /o7GWv Signature Director.Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cor\st c can S',ekAcin. COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira �.._. PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 C/r,p �/ • up vtT. LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North r, C%n; • SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an exi§i ce `J single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a ��� Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore,the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. ,c, C'° CODE-RELATED COMMENTS T U�4( E.� N JC 1 �EG2 I I N G f2��U i t2CI' G / /t../ s r �+.J //.) D0-J 1� ��� FCk. ��Ure,00 S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. J Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P( s COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks,which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet WjA0C, 71/6 ,/er-11743 91C.) elo B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS L./AA) a/IA /1,€) 7t) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS i )9)> Iit4"4° 7.‘e ied4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is needed t petty assess thi�al. / /�l /� L /e Signa ure of Director or Authon ed epresentative Date ((( Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rent:;.: Department of Planning/Building/Public Wo..:_ ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: phut Reiteuj— W a'—COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF PFM ' PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North OCT ) H10() SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f.BulLuil,3i.:+ .: v YVY�./lal SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval of a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential-8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet • 14,000 Feet CITY OF RENTON Dv 16 2OO B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS BUILOINU LA V 10I064 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /h O J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whey additional information i needed to properly assess this proposal. i, /0 0/40-r0 Si •,11 re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rout • Rev.10/93 City of Ren..,,, Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:•Twe__ eveVe-trch_crvA COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/0s f C L D V APPLICANT: Becky Byus &Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley ihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 OCT 1 3 2000 LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 29f9 s.f. CITY OF RENTON ( FtRE DErAHIMENT SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remuu't- single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require approval o a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS - C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ti dP2 0.01(1/LdtAI'l We have r-viewed this applic ii� with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas • o where adnal information J-eded to properly assess this proposal. dr /011 Sign-tor- of Director or Authorize.,representative Date Routi e / Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Vlionts ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' 900A6- I COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus&Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira „ PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 r,,•�,^ LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. 4j,,A. ',_yA,,, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remo e an ezisti rr '`4 single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would requirprov `kf a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remainjrg setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requestedlin order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ao Gommf 5 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . AN tb \tA?„,y0 Sig at a of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public V4.,nb ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:St ,c� ` ka v- COMMENTS DUE: 10/27/00 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-125,SV,V-H DATE CIRCULATED: 10/13/00 APPLICANT: Becky Byus &Kevin Lindahl PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Lindahl Residence WORK ORDER NO: 78740 ` 7, LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North On• " L9 SITE AREA: 7,630 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 2989 s.f. • �n1/1jy+ Q. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodell4 ppexisting`'�-, single familyhome located on the Lake Washington shoreline. As proposed, the project would require appr Va of a L,� Shoreline Vriance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines. The remaining//;� setbacks, which are from the development standards of the Residential—8 (R-8) zone, are being requested in ofto build within the required 20-foot front yard setback, as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both f e north and south sides of the structure. All variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore, the proposal also requires issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Ivb otie-1J • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • nc1� to 115 alpyo Sign t of irector or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 :>:>::...D� �LC�hM I�T..S�RULC.� ... .lUl. ... ..N..................................... 4. 66.44b .�... ix ................................................................................. PROJECT NAME: 1.--1140.601►1.. otres\PLI 4k• APPLICATION NO: LUW oo - I Z S) S\/ ) V -H Gib`'°, YU1!or� The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. ��� ?fi,� NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL' , NUMBER ✓��/� Z MIS G TA-3dA 05 Se deg4z5 �L o 33`030 0100--'0 5 38,P-S tAA. 33' 2-7D 0l1Q 03 5daoo6 P r'i4. 98oslo �TAJLG ��vcvrr+� 38?1 LK 64. 11) N . 3341- 0—old-S--O( qoye R, S R epirre IA-. 9,9051, vCG ' � ( 38 is L ( Oi-, 6-V.�. 33g4,3�0 - O i x--o,c ER 146,9A . �nn.�;�: K( 3911 L-K 4�,� Jth >r� d : 33i 7-0-�°Ne - ©s (_/.. p4 }`0J .V� . 33t )7 .of R,-o'f r .. 3717 t.j< WA. &v� 3.�y��-- Oro- 0�( Rol wa / s6 -ec-ri ;C( 3715" x.K k. List, 331;70 49I1 -0 Ri cam. 9Bo ro \AN Balcvt-T Repiren1c,t 960510 Z70 -ni i)P--D� 3"?-13 A-K u _Bab 4 334.270 -' 07-1 0-0‘, PCnivreiNiCA& 14-1 LI< ook, $d-�� N 33Wen 0-03 o-06 6H AL61 4,6 ScLL, 3-0 3 i K cat. 33cf3lo- 6381 -Oc P-eiv tA. 9/ c S(, (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) "1 (Continued) - NAME • ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL OrIP1 G"k � ` aoN 5�a(0 i-K- Gt o B6-v-b, Ii NUMBER z ouc.t l'iNI /2,•5141- vast, �po5( 33,070_.03%.- 0® - 5 ygor.i r Fe,I,aaNE,t-r-4 3=fd 0 1,g_ (A-, alb 64• 33 c.+ 0—&3 3 -07 • Applicant Certification I, )tV?1 I . Lutlt'kIWL_ , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ Title Company Records °< King County Assessors Records ' Signed Date /� � e7 . 90 Applicant) -NOTARY ATTESTED: S bscribed and sworn before me, a'Nota P, iblic, in an¢�,for t e State of Washington, residing at a O - on the /� day of 6)6)0 fIU , q-0 i Signed NotaryAmp Public) lii�f°� cr= �l S?d� S' '- : -- ::;.. :.:::..::: ;.. .. : • :.: ::.�:.�.:�::::. ...::.:.,t,t ht ::.. wit**:::::>::>::::>:c:::i•::- :.:::is..<i:::::.:::<:::•><:.::.:„..:: j :- - .: .::...;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:.:: :.:::.;;;'.;:.;...;:.;;;:.:,:.;:::g.;:;_ G :.Re on';.Use::;.:::;......:.,,,i§::::::;.;, , :.'.;:.. .. . .: . .For it of nt ................ .::::::....... 1:' C:a.r � r:Y` �yy�AAJ1 11 ...::.::::............................. ..... :.::.::: . .. CERTIFLCAT,CONOF:.� ir. :..;: ::.. :: .... . ' .<. : . . :.: . ........................ . ................:..:'::::::..:..:. ... ..:.... . i:Ind t.: :>>:SS ::' ' hereb: ::certif .;.that::notices:of>t l:::.b� : (,, I ;- mailed to>>: ::<:>:;::< :. :::::.. �51t�MISS.1..:.:. EXPI >;:;:::::;:«:>::.:;::>::>»:.>:. .:::;.;::::>;.>::: Ci .;r*m to ee ;;;;;;;;;;:;;:;;::>::.. : ::::;::<:i:;«<::<:.::.:;.;::i:;; ;;;d::::a :':::i:: i;:: -.::.. :::.:.• ... 3 each..listed: ro ert ::own.er..:.on........�....3:.01�.... ..:.:::...:....:..::.:::::::::. . .. : .: . >tc> ...:::::.... :.:: . Slned�� .::::::::::..::.-�-�x'�::.:..::::::.::.::::::::::::.:.<:>:::;<>:.•.;'.>':.::>Date.:.,...::.: . .3.....:....... ......::.<:::.> .:.:-.;.;:.;:.;;;:.:".;.:. N TARY o tr:1 State of ' as ` ton r 1 n . ATTEST :>Subscribed:andsworn`beforeme>;a:;N:pfa:::;Pu:akin andfr:..h...::.. W ..hin _:... .. . .. 20';>' ; :::;: ::i:!::..i:. :::>:>: ><: a.... ::��r:��--,.........:....................<.:n;th. :>.�5'�'` t.�f.. .............. ...... :... , ::.�o ::..;:.;:.;:.;.;:.::... .:::>:::>:i : .::fit:. :::... ..... ....... : ..: :: ::.::.:.. . ;: :: Signe&. :::,:etia--jjL,-..-•'''''< e'iVi-e,d1:.::''''::::::::::'::'''''''..:.:.'''.:':....--................... ..::.--;: ,;:::.---.!:m;:i.i.:i.i.. :i:]::i:i::i Iistprop.doc REV o3ROARllyN KABKHEFF - MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 i ' Uti'VY Ur r NOTICE OF APPLICATION • A Master Application has been Bled and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-00-125,SV,V-If,SME I LINDAHL REMODEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants are requesting approval of four variances in order to remodel an . . existing single family home located on the Lake Washington shoreline.As proposed,the project would require approval of • • • • a Shoreline Variance in order to construct within the 25-foot setback required from all shorelines.The remaining setbacks, which ere from the development standards of the Residential—8(R-8)zone,are being requested in order to build within the required 20-foot front yard setback,as well as within the required 5-foot side yard setbacks on both the north and south sides of the structure.NI variances will be considered by the Hearing Examiner.The construction of single family homes is exempt from the City's requirements for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Therefore,the proposal also requires Issuance of a Certificate of Exemption from the Shoreline Master Program. ' PROJECT LOCATION: 3719 Lake Washington Boulevard North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Shoreline Variance,Zoning Variances(3),Shoreline Exemption Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to LESLEY NISHIHIRA,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 27,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,200D,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner, If you have questions about This proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive ' additional notification by mail,contact Ms.NIshihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: September 22,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13,2000 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 13,2000 w I' i nt 't tat 2._' /,r . '32D0AcrW J' e ' , 2 .,, , '�. Q.:Via. 'l�:ytl: i Ae. elf ., i}Lys ,t � : I� . 3a,a,. „,4111) 0.,4 1 • r . :€ '8_ARNENq - I 9 U D ppiI ct iQ' I l ;iN. SEMI ST NOTICE OF APPLICATION ir3'- , o h a r V,_b CERTIFICATION I, n d o e Eli&L( Lit) , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted.by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby . - -the described property on . ¢. /3� . Signed: ( . ,-r 2 -- . ATTEST: Subcribed•and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing ui € 34-a,,,, ,on the 2 c day of 0 r , 7.Is6X,9 .o MAF YN KAMCHEFF G��41Ji NOTARY PUBLIC �� : STATE OF Wl�loHINGT(71 • COMMISSION EXPIRES p MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29, 2003 1, MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 CITYJ)F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • October 13,2000 Kevin Lindahl Becky Byus 3719 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Lindahl Remodel _ • Project No. LUA-00-125,SV,V-H,SME • • Dear Mr. Lindahl and Ms. Byus, The Development Planning Section of the City::of,Renton=-has determined that the subject application is complete according to 'submittal requirements and, therefore, is • accepted for review. • A Public.Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor:'of City.Hall, 1055 South:Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on December 12, 2000 at 9`:00:,AM to consider the proposed Variances. The applicant or representative(s) of;the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to'.you one week before the hearing. If appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lesley Nishih' Project Manager• _ . • cc: Jim Musar,Aspects, Inc. a ooptanoo 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 .......:.. ...............:........:.:.... .... ::::::::::>:•••••::::::>:>"".......::::::::::::::::""<:::::>:: ...:........................................................................................�...........:...:.:::.:::::::::::.:.......... ...............................:R...:J EST..�.iV�L��iMI�T�O N::.:::::::::.:.:::.::::::::::.. Note<>ifi:tf`.ere:is rji ore th en o e 1e>;al Owner?'>::8':::'`: ;6:iiirite!>:.;:::<:::<:::e< >•::::>::>: n a Mast r.. lcsto''>fa`.:see'::<;:.;:.;:;.:<:;:.:.: : ,.;. > >?':>'.>'> »>>> >':>'.«>»»»> App rx. r.: ch.owne�...:.. .....:..:............:.....,,:.:...... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • NAME: L I4 0Avi'�. �t S10I4r3G6 141 . 1 1L.V 1rN 14I9J Dfte*L.• PROPERTY/PROJECT� AD RESS(S)/LOCATIOf _ o ADDRESS: 3 ! 1 / W/t* w(.,i 4 (5(id1P. S7141 LA L. (�.� h�I�vc�pa 12ioNitO f..) . q b o • CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 4.?4rTbP 1 9 60 (e) .3514 z.v ool i aer. TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): • (4.2.6) "/7.�..w.zc... 6 (4cri PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: . •1" • TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .......::..r:..:::::,.:. .:. • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): QEi/f` f�{1/I ?T L NN NAME;; J~'= aCe3� ��T• • CITYLQ OFEP(-?r �PIC�IVING �, 0S� SEP 2 06 • PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED GOtv1PAN'Y(if applicable): ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION.AREA? 151011 31 ; CITY: ZIP: f' .i�1� . ,Q_J' q(3isr IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY i f r9�+ SENSITIVE AREEA�?��,j TELEPHONE R:UMBE am. �"""' ���. �^�� Zs�(o) 14.3- A-R a.<- „ ... --- • - - -- • - -• - --- - -- ------- ' ---• -.. '. — - ' -- ' - ' - . _ . ... . .-. . --, , -- -r-* IZEdlietitgdttigtfititti:tirPRO#Eitilitaft0061:10iiiiiiiiikifikOltiiggiMifitilinliallillill ••••.•••••••••••••••••••.•.........................•••••••.•••••••••••...........................................%..................................... .............,.....................,.... ...,........................................................ .. ... ..... a.m. ,5 U. AN' ' _ ,Co' -- .... •-,'-ii ::::::igi::5ii.i.:::imiaimmi::i•?:mEmagigE""";]"0"'"oniTyPE::i0PiAPPLICATIOWflgeifEES:i0::i::i:.: :::]::i.,..:.:.: i:iii:n:iiiiiii:iiniiiiili:i:iiiiiiiiii:iiiiiimii?:i.::iumi:i::in:i:iiii:i.,i.::iiii.,:nii::i .,.. „ , . . .. ...; . .,, • .... _ ,.., .... . . _ANNEXATION _ ,- , . .„ $ .7 ., ... SUBDIVISION:COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ ' ..' , . .. .. . ,, . . . . .. . , . .. . _ . REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT , , - •• $ , , . _TENTATIVE PLAT _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL • $ _ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT , •$ _ . . (NO:CLI.NDS: - : ' ” -) ' ' 0.., PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ . • __.VARIANCE $ )- -_,.)- (FROM SECTION: ) • PRELIMINARY FINAL WAIVER $al, _ . _WETLAND PERMIT --'. -•-', '', - ,•- :.'$ .... _.... ...,, -. : . • ,.. ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ —SHORELINE.REVIEWS: • . SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ ___ EXEMPTION $No.Charoe . — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ SOC3a) _ _ REVISION ,,,, . $ - V.;:::N:*iim:',imii'::•i':':':•:,..iiMing:•:i:f,'i....mi::'.::i!:: ::] .:::-,i.aii.aiM'i',.i.,:'i::::::Mg:H:liFFIDAvIT:.;.::,0RowN.ER:sFil.wii,.iiiiiiii.,.,:iiigiiiiii„.:::i„ii.:i.,,..:::iiiiiiii.:iiii:aiiiiii:iii....:i.. :;...ii.,:: :i:n.,i.,:.:i:im::.,iii:::::0.„;:,.,:ii:ii::. .:a: I, (Print Name)K61/14) 1, i.:1 itnAfit,, declare that I am (please check one) /the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, , • ATTEST: SubscribAnd sworn to be/fore:0 /.,/ .16,_. a,Not-ary.,PubliC.,An'ffilcJ KEv 1.1.i i_. , 1-.1/JINN/IL ' • ', for the State of W •f •X ., residing a . -:. •.: ,;,..•'- ' ,.-. .._ •,: (Name of Owner/Representa lye) at (e-- , on the day of .:, ... ,,• .• .- -.-: Z . • . • - l . - :.,' s:s - •/, . L -re of IN' e.presen ive) . -. ..• ' , „ . (Signature of Notary Public) % ' ef4R.DeofA) 0: PkoartoA) .."::".:':';1: :.i''''';iiii:111111111•1111111117,3141:iiiis‘"igiigil.""iiiiil ""gAiiiiiiirigy.1Viivtatctliii!iaii$oniiiiliiiiiimullemisilion!iiiiiiiiiimii;,iiiiiii: Wi':': i.i'Ms•:.:::..i :.... '::'': : ' ''' ""'"'"': :::!Uk'":-'i'"bUffatt:P'::':'::tt.K.::: :Ei'M :CEtffitk.N:o6oi.oipf2.4Aie):QMk%N.:.i::NANgAApmptgggtA.::?:ag9AR,9EgPA.!.iiog; : :::-,„..: . - .:. ..,:..,:,..,:,:i,:::,:,,,:,: ::1::iiiiiiiiiiiii.ii.i]...;.:•:Ivt....:....H.iiiti#0...:6....o.....1.1110:610.P.IRINA-V-Mii::::gil:litg•Ki8igglil.::latiqii.,ca:,iii:,:iiii$14.14.:..E:41ilir. .T.iis....10:.,.r..i.1.:!!:::s..:..m..,..E...ii...il.i.i.i.i.it.::...P.,:Eiiy!..Fiv...j...,,B2ii.q:i.v....tH..,...!.i!!!w.....,....!.:!.:.:..i.,.::! .."".•."•""""••••.•-.... ...................-.....................:.:„.:.:.:.:„,.:.:...:.:.:::,....x.:.:„:„.:.:::.:.:...„.,.:,..... itiiiiiii.li!i .wP.ltbtAiir#..tt..§iintiiiiigiggigiiiiiiiiii.iffiniiii.inlieiiiigii!igtOrAtiiti..0.a:0 ..plitGvio0-1..2*1:iw:mi.1:-,iiqi:?:iimini.mominimcm:: :::R: i:,„.::i::::IngEma.ammi.:iimi.iimii.iii.:.ii.i::.:iii::iii:i:i:.::minimiiiiimaililiimiqt:tal..i:i..i,i,:i:i:i:i:::::i*.::::::i*:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.,..:.::...,.........,.... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 . ..: ,. _ ,_ - . • • .. 7 • • • • • • • • • • • • } LEGAL DESCRIPTION! • THAT PORTION OF LOTS' 36, 37, AND 38, BLOCK 'A', HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NUMBER 2, ACCORDING • TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 64, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON) AND THAT PORTION OF THE FORMER NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 31 AND 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS! ' BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 321 THENCE N 14. 07' 48' E A DISTANCE OF 621.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON A NON RADIAL CURVE TOrTHE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 64' 34' 04' E A DISTANCE OF 2023.59 FEET WITH A DELTA OF 01' 01' 31'j THENCE CONTINUING ALOfl TTHE CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 36,21 FEET) THENCE N 88' 00' 09' W, A -- DISTANCE OF 72,08 FEET) THENCE S 14' 41' 39' W, A DISTANCE OF 33.,59 FEET) THENCE S-•87' 42' 54' E, A DISTANCE•OF 64.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORELANDS ADJOINING. 1\ • AUDITOR ' S CERTIFICATE SURVE ;, . ,• THIS MAP CI • .'%:. ..:,;;: • :��-: wigLED FOR RECORD • DAY OF - • MADE BY ME FORMANCE 1301 OF SURVEY REC AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF ACCURACY UNLIMITED. y� INS /44 •• COUNTY AUDITOR CHARL�E.S W. RECORDING FEE AUDITOR'S FILE # .___,_ DATE _8 z_ c i:i:is.i:.i.::.iY.ii::i:i:p:.i:.i:.:i:ii;ii:i i:3i:.ii:<p'.i:i:•i}X:�ii::•i:::v : :::::::::::::::: ::f : ii!L!:.:.'; :iTYOF{RENTO ;::> „Y ?:?:::::< �>.::::i ;:: : : ii ;:;: s:::::::::: :: ; ;: i < ; " M „. >:: :::: %:::::::.... ...:.:::::::::.„_...:::::..;. .;:;:::::.::::::::::::::::..:/:....: ' :; :: : ' < :i RV ES>D V .t» . :>'» € ;:> iiiin:>Apii `> [[< :`i::: im : : USE: F %ERMI: .• .: : : I ............ ....... » .P E T I FO..: . Cl ::E TY:.OIN.AI[!.R�. :: > > > »> > >< ': >;<........ . . . . . ....... . ... .R.. ..TIO.111.................................. : : >: <:: :»:.•<;:.:i>: :::>< ;;;::;;...:.::::....:.........:::......................::...........:....;,...:::.... .... ..................... Note:i:::;:If there>1s:mote::;than one::legal owner;:;please attach an::;idd tionat ittarlZ£4l MaterrAppficattb:i for;eacb.owiaer, ..,... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: �/4..1104 M1 AI�'t s/044✓ IS E,4•14-r ,y4 Lr 1 ' /5 PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 3 /^ l 9 t 1 I...kik:3 141104 yTuN (e 4.1 !' 111 LM 1.4 A$g 14c470,..) L 0 1+ 1 gt. es, 1.1\4 . 9 60640 CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 44104 R t505(.0 r_ . 1 31427 '0 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): < 5) 2 7 1-24014. .....::. :.: :. :.:.:...:. 1A I s►� '.'PP ICA:ITT:. if::>oth.er.::<:than::::owner:i : PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: /kw ,0 �1 ,5 ,3 5I4GLk, r 7 lam COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: gsF- ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): r CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: �i 1 r Q F'4-,V3®iv`LVG 4157,� TELEPHONE NUMBER: „opaD����n„ // PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): :;; .;�.:;.�1::..,.�; .;::.::._i.:;.:i�:.>•;.:;>:: >;:.;:.;;::::;:.:;;<.:;.>:i:>:::::::':';:;:i::i::i::i::i::i::i'Gi::is:::i;:><::::;:>:::<:::>�<::<::; t: S:Q .::::::.......... ............ k, ,...';,:' -"" SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): COM0ANc i't,appli.cablei: PROJECT VALUE: • _,• ' ,' __ I nl c''. -- 1�"o, ate. ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? ) 5110)1 31- . fj4 CITY: ZIP: 44-�Z AG�•j 44.- i r 5/SQ✓ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: / /A ith / 1 C 6.it i�r � CZ L'6) 3 63 - e5 B a5- 16C( ................................... .. ...... i:i:iiiii {.:::::._i:i::�i?ii:::: :.I . .. .•. .: .}: ..: .. '?i"'. :�i�::'vi:;iii:ii"Ji:•i:Lhii� .::::SC TI;ON::>...::1:P.R :> ::: '::' : ::.;y::•:.y:.;:: ....Y. :;}v:.:::::::<::::.;'i:.:'.i::.:::.'::::;::'::i:;:::Si::i::ii::i:::.:'::::ii:<�ii� :::>::::::;:<:>::>::::>::::>:::>:::::.:.<:<:;:>:::.::.::.:.::......::.:... ......... tta te..sh.ee�::::if::::ne.ce >::>::>:: >::>:: :::<:;::>::>::>:.;::::>::>:: > :::<:;::::>::> .: ;::»:: ::::>::>::> :>:;» »»: :::.G.l:: ec...all..a . ._cap aln..t es..�.a�.� ....C.��. ..s��.fi~..�nrM...� .eter..m. ! .O..fees .. .............. ..................... —ANNEXATION - $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ _ • _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $_ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • $ • _ PRELIMINARY PLAT l' $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ __ (NO. CU. YDS: • • ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ -' . . - ___VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION '— . , . MOBILE HOME PARKS: .. $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _✓SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ v VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ a' IDA "I`C'<>b'.P ` 1'N :S'`:.; ;]ii» '»»> « «> :m c >>>> > »>>>' >'><>< <><>' << ><'> > I, (Print Name) I ' ! g'/t)S , declare that I am (please check one)V_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ..`` ed e.Ccc>v ATTEST: Subscripe andisworn to before e;a_Ntary_'PTuylic, ia'ai:d /_ ��S for the State of. GSi` residing a . (Name of Owner/Represents ive) Sea e- _ , on.the/O day or.: - -- - : (Signature of 0 ner/ presentative) - (Signature., C /Iti6 t) c)t1k®'?J, :Tl is>se'c to e >:: >peete'. > S :"' `'<'<» <»> ><< ` <>>> << > > _ > > ><« <` ::...iii.g::.:::::..>;;:>,:::::::: :: ::::::>::>::;::..:.;':: ti .n..v..b ..co.m d.b....Cit ... .#off ........... ...... >:<:::>:::>;:::<:::::>::>Cit::;>File:::Number:::::>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::>::>::::>:<:::>:<:::>::::>::::>::>::>::::>::A::::<A �D>;::::B P:s::C :.-5:;>::::CA ><:<::: >' >::>:::;.:: :: >ii ::.;'..;:<:::::>:: >::::>::::>::::>::::::it ..................:..Y................................................................................ ..:.. .:.A...:::::...5..::::::CAP:....:.::�.:.P.:tJ.:: CFA:.::CU.:f1.: .:CU::H:::: E.GF::::LLA:::::::::::::::::. : <:::><>.:::.<: <: .HP:<::<:�E?:11ti <'ER?PP'::'R ....R. .M.f�....SA..A.. .SA S L S S S. ..... :.... :... .::. .. ...... .. ...:... :..... ..:::.::::.:::.:M.:..:.:: . .. . . . .. ..:H».:. .F1P. ..A..... HPL..N......SN...... .M . :.:M�.:.::'1`f�::..�/:A.:::V.:�.:::u.H.:::.:W.::: >'.C?TA :FEEES'»: ]minim< '>':»:>1><:ii:i:iiiiii'*.i:ii;0 : ;:,:t :Vii.: . _ ;'`ii:*:»:i' i:>»:r: >: •:ta]i;:i1;i zE:.i: :i:>: MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 r- • 1 • • • • • • • • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION' THAT PORTION OF LOTS 36, 37, AND 38, BLOCK 'A', HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NUMBER 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 64, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON! AND THAT PORTION OF THE FORMER NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 31 AND 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS' ' BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32! THENCE N 14' 07' 48' E A DISTANCE OF 621.78 FEET TO THE•TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON A NON RADIAL CURVE TOcTHE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S 64' 34' 04' E A DISTANCE OF 2023.59 FEET WITH A DELTA OF 01' 01' 31'! THENCE CONTINUING ALONCT HE CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ,ARC DISTANCE OF 36.21 FEET! THENCE N 88' 00' 09' W, A DISTANCE OF 72.08 FEET! THENCE S 14' 41' 39' W, A DISTANCE OF 33..59 FEET! THENCE S.•87' 42' 54' E, A DISTANCE•❑IF 64.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORELANDS ADJOINING. • 1, AUDITOR ' S CERTIFICATE SURVE � THIS MAP CI FOR RECORD'THIS ,• DAY OF. • ; ; ' " MADE BY ME • FORMANCE OF SURVEY RE( AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF ACCURACY UNLIMITED. yf2 04, COUNTY AUDIT❑R CHARLES W, • RECORDING FEE • AUDITOR'S FILE it DATE _&. L MIL r.- rrON t , • Ai AsyIcTo Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. September 15, 2000 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/ CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT �fO V'0/ tiiyt, 1`' '` � Ltio PROJECT NARRATIVE v ;'%)) Owner: Kevin and Becky Lindahl 3719 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton,WA 98056 (425)271-2616 Lot size : Total lot size 7630 s.f. with 2314 s.f. east of bulkhead. The remaining lot is submerged west of bulkhead. (E) east portion of lot is approximately 33' wide x 72' at north property line and 65' at south property line to the bulkhead. Effective buildable pad after required setbacks imposed is 816 s.f. with a buildable width to access street of 23'. Zone: R-8 for our site and the neighborhood. Current use: Our site is located west of Lake Washington Blvd. N., accessed by a private access easement. The neighborhood consists of lake side homes bordered to the west by Lake Washington and to the east by train track, Lake Washington Blvd. N., and further residences up the hill. The existing.house is one story over daylight basement, 2 bedroom/2bath,with attached tandem carport and on grade decks to both the east property line and the west bulkhead. The house footprint is approx. 18'-6" wide x 51'-0" deep. Existing basement= 754 s.f. with 129.5 s.f. outside covered porch. Existing main floor=883.5 s.f. with 592 s.f. covered porch with tandem carport. Total existing = 1637.5 s.f. habitable with 721.5 covered space. The existing basement has a maximum ceiling height of 6'-3", in some places as low as 6'-0". The existing,perimeter foundation walls are hollow core CMU block. House does not appear to be anchored to the foundation walls. Substandard heating, plumbing and structural conditions exist. 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 rr • I -pm gill MI lk me O Y E C U O Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 2: Lindahl Narrative Current use: West shoreline setback required 20'-0". (E) 11'-8" minimum. (cont.) Neighbors to the north and south also approx. 11'-8" minimum. (E) deck max. 18" off grade to the bulkhead. North side yard setback required 5'-0". (E)3'-2" minimum. Neighbor to the north with abutting side yard approx. 7'-0" min. Minimum distance between houses 10'-0". East front yard setback required 15'-0". (E) 3'-0" minimum. Neighbors to the north and south approx. 3' minimum front yard setback. On grade deck to the property line. South side yard setback required 5'-0". (E) 0' at tandem carport on property line. Neighbor to the south shared side yard (E) approx. 13' min; space used as a parking stall. Height required 30'-0" average on sloped site. (E) 17'-5". Neighbors north and south approx. 30'-0" with approx 35' at lakeside. Throughout the neighborhood there are 2 and 3 story structures facing the water. Special features: To the west of the bulkhead is Lake Washington. To the east of the property is a 9'6" access road with a 47% slope up to the Burlington Northern Railroad. The land slopes up 63% to Lake Washington Blvd. N. approx. 100' to the east of-the property. Nearest neighbor to the east is approx. 200' east and 45' higher in elevation. See sections. Soil type: See geological report. 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 • _;. _ IN ` I n} • --Li111 III Ali Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 3: Lindahl Narrative Proposed project: We explored many options for this site and arrived at what we feel is the best solution for the community and the clients. • Remove existing house down to foundation walls. • Remove existing brick chimney down to the firebox shoulder; replace with new wood framed chimney and flue. • Either reinforce(E)foundation walls or build new wood stud bearing walls and footing to support new main floor on the interior of the(E) walls (eliminate the interior posts and provide 7'6" to 8' ceilings • Build new main floor(9' to 9'6" plate height)_within existing footprint except at the two locations indicated on the site and floor plans (these still occur within the setback requirements). • Build a new second floor(8' plate height)within the existing footprint, similar to main floor except at the west wall. This wall is offset 11° east from the existing footprint providing a roof top deck over the first floor within this 11'. • Raise the(E),carport to 9' plate height, maintaining a flat pitch. • New average height to be 30'-0" as per city codes. Lot coverage: Existing=proposed= 1427 s.f. /7630 s.f. = 18.7% Parking: (E) = proposed=2 tandem off street stalls. Square footage: (E) see above. Proposed 2417.5 s.f. habitable space with 617 s.f. covered porches and carport and 203.5 s.f. 2nd floor deck Height: Proposed new height within 30'-0" height limit required for sloped sites and view corridors are not appreciably diminished.. See site sections. Variance req'd: 7.14.01 B Residential Development. Residential structures are setback from water a minimum.of.20'. "Development Standards for Single Family Residential Zoning Designations" R-8 4-2-110A. Side yard setbacks are 5'-0". 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 • rr II • ■ NO 1° ` 1 as II A O Y E C T O Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 4: Lindahl Narrative We are applying for variances from: 1) 20' lake side setback. Maintained to 11'-8", at worst case. 2) 5' sideyard setbacks. • Maintained at 3'-2" to the north side yard, at worst case. Maintained at 0' at south side yard,where existing carport sits. 3) Increased height within required setbacks. 4) Front yard setback 15'. Maintain at 3' (adjacent neighbors' front yard setbacks are 3'min. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION Mitigation: Proposed project should take 4- 6 months to build. Construction to occur Monday,- Saturday, 7am -5pm. All appropriate measures will be taken to mitigate noise, dust and all other noxious characteristics. Landscape issues: No trees to be removed or disturbed. ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE FOR SHORELINE.EXEMPTION PERMIT: Exemption : Construction on shorelands by an owner of a single family residence. Does not exceed 35' height and meets all State and local requirements other than those imposed pursuant to this chapter. Construction cost: $200,000- $240,000. Exemption req'd: Exemption sought due to encroachment into shoreline setback. 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 • rr 1. I � �l .. IN O Y E C U S , Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 5: Lindahl Justifications CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT 10. Justifying the Nonconforming Structures: . Potential of site redevelopment: Due to tight access restraints, the steep slope to the east, and the water to the west, it was important to find a solution which minimized the use of heavy equipment or required below grade shoring of foundation. We believe a combination of using/modifying the existing basement structure and rebuilding the main floor will best mitigate the impact on the neighborhood, so the proposed plan retains the foundation walls as shoring for our new bearing walls in the basement, with new construction arising from there. Excavation and shoring are thereby minimized. Our buildable pad for a conforming structure would be approximately 816 s.f. with a 23' street front width. Our building would change from being long and narrow to being square and massive with the main floor dominated by garage and stair circulation. Compared to the proposed plan, this scheme would require a more complicated construction process and reduces the visibility to the water from the street. It would also reduce our view and light corridors to the west and east due to the neighboring houses. Building within the required setbacks produces more house than desired and would not be economically feasible for the client. Furthermore, to adhere to the buildable pad would greatly reduce the usage of the property currently enjoyed by the existing house and the neighborhood. Condition of building/structure: In its current condition, the house has inadequate systems: foundation walls, headroom in basement, heating, plumbing, and possibly electrical. Once retrofitted as proposed, the house's inadequacies would be brought up to current building safety and energy codes, and would be aesthetically harmonious with the neighborhood. Public welfare, health and safety would be enhanced. 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 rr �IIIII!I � I IINO , AI Ind Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 6: Lindahl Justifications Departure from zoning codes: The proposed project would maintain existing setbacks. Although this does not meet current zoning codes to the letter, it does maintain minimum 10' side yard setbacks to the adjacent neighbors structures, 10' to the north, approx. 13' to the south, and 11'-8" (waterside, the same as the adjacent neighbors). These setbacks do not pose a threat to public health, welfare or safety. SHORELINE EXEMPTION PERMIT l 17. Justification for the Variance Request: a. Undue hardship: The applicant suffers undue hardship and feels the variance is warranted for the following reasons: 1. Substandard quality exists. The current house is of substandard quality and is aesthetically not on par with the neighborhood; improvements need to be made. This house was constructed in 1932 using hollow CMU block foundation walls, the house is probably not mechanically fastened to these walls, basement ceilings are 6'.0" to 6'3", and it has substandard heating, plumbing, windows, insulation, and probably electrical systems. The neighborhood consists of newer and larger homes of post-1970's construction. 2. Lot width. The lot consists of approx. 2314 s.f. of land east of the existing bulkhead. The remainder of the lot is submerged. The lot size is approx. 33' wide x 72' along the north property line and 65' along the south property line,with a current buildable pad of approx. 816 s.f. (23' wide x 39' north and 33' south). The lots both north and south of applicant's property are similar in depth but are substantially wider, approx. 56' - 90'. Conforming to the current zoning restrictions, the garage and house circulation would overwhelm the main floor, thereby forcing a more massive structure to meet the clients' modest program desires (a 3 bedroom,3 bath house with living room, kitchen, dining, den, and outdoor covered space along with a 2 car garage/carport). 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 - (206).363-8805 • IT I III II °ASP° M � � � Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 7: Lindahl Justifications 3. Neighborhood impact. We have considered the construction impact on the neighborhood. Given its extremely narrow site and tight eastern access,we believe the proposed straightforward construction will minimize the impact on the neighborhood (see Justifying the nonconforming structures, page 5). 4. Minimal s.f. increase. Existing s.f. Proposed s.f. Main floor: 884 958 Basement: 754.* 754 Second floor 0 705.5 Total: 1638 2417.5 Covered carport, porch, entry: 721.5 617 Deck. 203.5 * with 6'-3" maximum head clearance Many houses along.the shoreline are substantially larger than our proposal. Although our house will still be one of the smallest houses on the waterfront,we believe it is proportional to our site and the, neighborhood. 5. Precedence. The current waterside setbacks for the majority of houses along the waterfront appears to be as little as 10', as stated in two previously approved variances (File no. LUA-97-065,V Provost Variance and LUA-092-147,ECF,SP,SM,V Cugini Shoreline Restoration). Our existing house and the neighbors to the immediate north and south currently enjoy approximately 12' setbacks to the water. Our proposal would put a flat roof with a deck within the waterside setback and would maintain the 22' height(to the top of the rail) that currently exists to the house ridge, effectively maintaining or improving view corridors for the neighbors. The added height of the house is within the 30' limit and due to the existing physical barriers will not appreciably reduce the view corridors to the uphill neighbors. See site sections. 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 rr • IIIII' . ■■ . l • _� .ii .II . as ASYECTO Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 8: Lindahl Justifications 6. No worse than existing condition. Our north side yard currently is a minimum of 10' away from the neighbor to the north (at the north west corner) and approx. 12' at the northeast corner of the property. Again, we would be building no closer than the existing condition. Due to the extremely tight width of our site, the house itself is only 20'-6" wide max., with 18'-6" for the majority, and a 10' tandem parking stall adjacent to the house. This forces the carport edge to land on the south property line, but on this side we abut auxiliary parking for the neighbor with a distance of 13' minimum between the houses. We simply do not have enough width to maintain required side setbacks and enjoy the same comparable use of the property as our neighbors enjoy. b. Variance will not be detrimental to public welfare: We believe that the granting of the variances proposed will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to neighboring properties. On the contrary, our proposal will substantially upgrade the house, bring the house up to the standards of current building codes thereby making it a safer neighbor, and will also improve the house aesthetically to be more harmonious and consistent with the neighborhood (which currently consists of more modern and larger houses). Current view lines will not be appreciably altered to the north and south (see site section A) and are consistent with neighbors along the water's edge. In the east/west direction, a natural buffer consisting of vegetated sloped hill, train easement, more vegetated sloped hill, Lake Washington Blvd. N., and more slope add up to about 40' -50' of elevation change in ti the 200' to the nearest east neighbor. Again, their current view is not appreciably altered and is consistent with the neighbors (see site section B). Established water side setbacks will be maintained and are consistent with the neighborhood. The two side yard setbacks are maintained at their current reduced margins, and are a minimum 10'.to the northern house and 13' to the southern house with the carport. 15617 37th Ave NE,'Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 • (206) 363-8805 rr as III 1 j� S T E C T S Architectural and Developmental Services, Inc. Page 9: Lindahl Justifications c. The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege. The granting of the variance does not provide us with special privileges inconsistent with neighboring properties because: 1. Again, due to the small and extremely narrow lot size compared to neighboring lots,we are bound to maintain the current side yard setbacks. Given this,we are still a 20'-6" wide house with an adjacent 10' wide tandem carport (note most neighbors have garages). Our current and maintained setback to the bulkhead is consistent with or greater than the surrounding shoreline properties. 2. Our proposed house size, height, location and character is consistent with the quality and charm of the neighborhood, although somewhat smaller. d. The approval is the minimum variance to accomplish the desired purpose. After reviewing several options, the proposed project is the minimum variance required to accomplish the desired purpose. By maintaining the existing house footprint, replacing the existing main floor, and adding a partial second floor raising the total height to 30', we have brought the house up to current codes, doubled our usable square footage, provided adequate headroom in,the basement, improved the visual quality of the house, and we will do this with the minimum impact in construction time and site work for the surrounding community. We believe this is the minimum project with maximum return in quality of life for both the homeowner and the neighborhood. • 15617 37th Ave NE, Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 - (206) 363-8805 PREAPPLICATION COMMENTS #00-49 D``'p;op m ,„Pl-ArlA1 LINDAHL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE REMODEL r1��1ltUN ��1I- 3719 Lake Washington Blvd N SEp ; May 18, 2000 2 ` 2009 tzo General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced remodel proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Department of Ecology, etc.). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning. and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available on-line at www.ci.renton.wa.us (go to the 'Site Index' and then to 'City Code—Renton Municipal Code') and are also available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is addressed as 3719 Lake Washington Blvd N. The proposal is to remodel an existing single family residence located on site in order to make the existing structure more modern and functional. The project involves an interior remodel, enclosure of some existing roofed areas, and raising the height of the existing structure an additional 4 feet within its existing footprint. Parking: Plans indicate that the 2 required off-street parking spaces would be provided within the existing carport. Zoning Requirements: The subject property is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (.R-8) zoning designation. The R-8 zone allows a maximum building. coverage of 35% of the lot area. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. As indicated on the plan submitted, the proposal will comply with these requirements (the water area of the lot can be included for the lot coverage calculation). Setbacks are measured from the property lines to the nearest point of the structure. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 20 feet in the front and 5 feet on interior side yards. Zoning Variances Required: The proposal will require three zoning setback variances: a front yard setback variance and two side yard setback variances. { Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption Required: The proposed project is within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington but is exempt from the requirement to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. However, the City's Shoreline Master Program does require the City to document this exempt status by issuing a Shoreline Exemption for the proposal. The applicant will need to submit an exemption application to the City, but no fee will be charged. Shoreline Variance Required: Since the project will require work in an area nearer than 20 feet from a water body that is regulated by the City of Renton's Shoreline Master Program, a Shoreline Variance is required. Application Requirements: The Shoreline Variance, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption, and the zoning variances will all be reviewed concurrently by the City. City staff will first make a recommendation to the.City Hearing Examiner. It appears that staff would be able to support the variance requests, provided the applicant was able to provide written information substantiating that the proposal complies with each of the variance approval criteria (See RMC Sections 4-9-250B5 and. Section 8.02 of the Shoreline Master Program, attached). After the public hearing,'the City Hearing Examiner will issue a report and recommendation to the Department of Ecology on the Shoreline Variances and will issue a decision on the zoning setback variances. There is a 14-day appeal period for the decision on the zoning variances and then a 30-day time period in which the Department of Ecology has to make the final decision on the Shoreline Variance. A 21-day appeal period will follow the Department of Ecology decision. In all, the applicant should allow a total of approximately 1Vor t land use process. The buildingpermit application process isW6 ate, but can be PP submitted simultaneously at the applicant's risk and option. However, no building permit may be issued before the end of the Department of Ecology appeal period. Fees: In addition to the applicable building permit fees, the following land use application fees would be required: • Shoreline Variance: 500.00 • Front Yard Setback Variance: $250.00 50,0v • Side Yard Variances: $598:-8O(2) • Shoreline Exemption: No fee. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Postage fees for the required mailing(s) to surrounding property owners will also be required at the time of application, but this is - usually less than $20.00. Comments by: Laureen Nicolay (425) 430-7294 cc: Jennifer Henning U:preapp • -- 4-9-250B 2. Waivers:(Reserved) 2. Filing of Application:A property owner, or his duly authorized agent, may file an ap- -� 3. Modifications:To modify a Code re- plication for a variance which application ti quirement when there are practical difficulties shall set forth fully the grounds therefor and involved in carrying out the provisions of this the facts deemed to justify the granting of Title when a special individual reason makes such variance. the strict letter of this Code impractical.(Ord. 4346,3-9-1992) 3. Submittal Requirements and Applica- tion Fees:Shall be as listed in RMC 4. Alternates:To allow the use of any ma- 4-8-120C, Land Use Applications,and terial or method of construction not specifi- 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. cally prescribed by this Title. (Ord.4346, 3-9-1992) 4. Public Notice and Comment Period: Notice of the application shall be given pursu- B. VARIANCE PROCEDURES: ' ant to RMC 4-8-090, Public Notice Require- ments. 1. Authority and Applicability: 5. Decision Criteria:The Reviewing Offi- a. Hearing Examiner Variances:The cial shall have authority to grant a variance Hearing Examiner shall have the author- upon making a determination in writing that ity to grant variances from the provisions the conditions specified below have been of this Title where the proposed develop- found to exist: ment requires or required any permit or approval as set forth in RMC 4-1-050H. a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary b. Board of Adjustment Variances: because of special circumstances appli- The Board of Adjustment shall have au- cable to subject property, including size, thority to grant variances from the provi- shape,topography, location or surround- , sions of this Title upon application to the ings of the subject property,and the strict Development Services Division where no application of the Zoning Code is found to approval or permit is required for the pro- deprive subject property owner of rights posed development which must be and privileges enjoyed by other property granted by the Hearing Examiner pursu- owners in the vicinity and under identical ant to RMC 4-1-050H.The Board of Ad- zone classification; justment shall have no authority to vary the terms or conditions of any permit,rec- b. That the granting of the variance will ommendation or decision issued by the not be materially detrimental to the public Hearing Examiner. welfare or injurious to the property or im- provements in the vicinity and zone in c. Administrative Variances:The which subject property is situated; Planning/Building/Public Works Adminis- trator or his/her designee shall have the c. That approval shall not constitute a authority to grant variances from the fol- grant of special privilege inconsistent lowing development standards when no with the limitation upon uses of other other permit or approval requires Hearing properties in the vicinity and zone in Examiner Review: which the subject property is situated; i. Residential Land Uses: Lot d. That the approval as determined by width,lot depth,setbacks, allowed the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjust- projections into setbacks, and lot ment is a minimum variance that will ac- coverage; and complish the desired purpose. ii. Commercial and Industrial 6. Special Review Criteria for Variances Land Uses:Screening of surface from the Aquifer Protection Regulations: mounted equipment and screening See chapter 8-8 RMC. of roof-mounted equipment. 9-73 • • SECTION 8. VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USES • ; 8.01 VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS • The Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant conditional use permits and variances in the administration of the Renton Master Program. The power to grant variances and conditional use permits should be utilized in a manner which, while protecting the environment, will assure that a person will be able to utilize his property in a fair and equitable manner. It shall be recognized that a lawful use at.the time the Master Program is adopted is to be considered a permitted use, and maintenance and restoration shall not require a variance or a conditional use permit. Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office for approval or denial. 8.02 VARIANCES Upon proper application, a substantial development permit may be granted which is at variance with the criteria established in the Renton Master Program where, owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property, the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria established in the Renton Master Program would cause undue and unnecessary hardship or practical difficulties. The fact that the applicant . might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the Master Program is not, by itself, sufficient reason for a variance. The Land Use Hearing Examiner must find each of the following: 8.02.01 Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. 8.02.02 The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. 8.02.03 The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. 8.02.04 The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. 8.02.05 The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by • granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. 43 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE REVIEW FEE SCHEDULE :........}'+ii, :v..:. :•w{{:v':':•:{iv}};i•}'-Y•}':::�v:::'-}}'-i'::?{{•.}•xr.•.bi}:•:iivi4}:d:'i}:irti•}vv:{+,{::::h'?t"•v. •r:•x:n•n.:::::::r ..:::i-i:}iii'4..n\ }.•iw :t.:..w...,•::�P?: , .,t,i. :•.t,•;i••-,},?::-mi.::::.•\,..,.:{;...:n{r�...q..-} K: :i,-:-.,.: .,.{,w..R:::�o:t�: n,c4?•:. .4:}.,vr}:::}::}}4\Y3.-::}>}}'tt:.}. :{{},{;{.}}:r:x:::3 .,.,w..,.::.2:.t,?.�c:•u,a',w�•g.::<a�{,C•;',�•>^:•:{.::.::..;?:.;....{;..r.,,.;{..v..r,,.�......,;C.,S,.}•..;�?}.;,;},r ..,4:... , S.;?:;;<;:.:. :{}.:•:}:.}v,•::::::.<,•:.} ?,{,...:.5.: h ..:\v:::^ 6;}:}::,•rv. ,•:+C+:,:{�>}vv�'+•:•n+::.i}.v3 rv.}•r� , ":o-.; v ,7�r h,}.,... ti:k::;'l,.•'' ;.ySi":n}}:•yr;::}{.v:.}:.......... }:ri:.}.. ,Q .•.�?{}:; ..i•...'Y�'..: ff „4..r.•: s:<::�.:+?•�C<:::•{+ryir.;::?<it:i}::::\:\$:.:::i: 1:::�}:i:$�'\' ►:i ii}:^�+':<• +}}•-#..,5-}>.S 4+C'i3`}':.{j}v;4}} ,\:+\ is ika x!C.+-}-:}}:: r:}. ,::}.vi}�:-i4.r wit?+i:l '•:}{S'•S+{i::i:ii iii: +}?c�c...{}' ,•?•:.£�•}:a-7,4x3.3iZ{•.,?�?s.,wi.., :-.{{,,,2.;••?,S:`S}»}::•x::.<i?;<.#:f::?t4i::••:r::: .,1,.;.. �OUI�'I�...;i , .:r .X•:r.?... .r...,..,....r .......}..... F::�.�T��:!•.f f��I.�}i:i. :vK, !:•. '�R:� .... .,i`v} . . ... ... :. ., ,..v. , n.....................................v�.�i�... :::. •�•x : ?.r.,{.:•::}..v: •:•43iw..n.. v:Kv.... �c.' n., ..., .. ,..i,. ::.tn....n...,.,}w,.....:.. :r:...t,•.^•.•xa?.ii:;i':%'•:;•:nnr.• :•.\•v4,...:+{.}}•.};{{:n , 4 .4 :.:\::•::•::::w::::;:.}}}•.:n v.,Y?r\{?+ :?:i i:iiLi::v'�: .,.:.✓r,w.?thvx-:txfv.niv,.w:.vv,.,n.3:?::.v:}:{t{{S}r:::w+..w::n.w:nv.4:.{S:i-:i:•:ii.}:i{{L{iO:?-\+S:•:{{{ti{nu{w:.v:.:v::}.:::::x.:\,U}:?ti•}':{.>}:i?-:.......n.. n..n.�3.?•::Y::}.v:l. .......hn.............. }'Y:::::.:MCA.......n,....n.....n..................................::n...... ..............................n.......:................n......n.........f.....::.v:::::.}....:}:isi:-T?:�{v::::::.:v::::::.v:::.::v:.v:......,�.........,..... ANNEXATION Expense for postage • APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION OR $75.00 ADMINISTRATIVE OR ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS BINDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL $1,000.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT $1,000.00 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT: Hearing Examiner Review $500.00 Administrative Review $250.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: Hearing Examiner Review $2,000.00 Administrative Review . $1,000.00 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/DRAFT AND FINAL 100% of costs of coordination, review and appeals ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Less than$100,000 project value $400.00 $100,000 or more project value $1,000.00 Environmental Review/sensitive lands Or lands covered by water, except minor residential additions or modifications $1,000.00 GRADING AND FILLING PERMITS $2,000.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $450.00 MOBILE HOME PARKS: Tentative $500.00 Preliminary $2,000.00 Final $1,000.00 PLATS: Short Plat $1,000.00 Preliminary Plat $2,000.00 Final Plat $1,000.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Tentative Plan $500.00 Preliminary Plan $2,000.00 Final Plan $1,000.00 REZONE: Less than 10 acres $2,000.00 10 to 20 acres $3,000.00 More than 20 acres $4,000.00 MIA a1Aw wldwv nlanUn'feahbl-doC /ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONSREQUIREMENTS' BY BY. COMMENTS Calculations, Surveyi Density Worksheet4 • •••••••.••-.-•••• Drainage Control Plan 2 Elevations,Architectural 3 AND 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 '....... .............. ............. Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 •-• Geotechnical Report 2AND3 Grading Plan, • n Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 • • .. • Landscaping Plan, Conceptual,' Legal Description 4 . List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels -• ,,-,---...—. .... ................for.Property ...Owners 4 .„..... Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 . .. . Master ............ • Application Form .. ..... Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking Lot ...„ . , .....Coverage..:.:.:.. Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Postage 4 ....... Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 ' ..• Public Works Approval Letter 2 ...... ..... Rehabilitation Plan 4 Epivnit.4y)-,64 CAze-4(Is4 IL ill\ This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: q. L R-e ;Peve-e 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 L.__ ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE • APPLICATIONS . . ........................... Screening Detail 4 - Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 '.: Traffic Study 2 ‘" •Cufttn Ne rfron T C e a ee:: x... . I Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 tin Wetlands Study 4 Ap licant`A reemertt Statement:;>>;::., , <:: ;: :: . :<' :> ::: Inventory of..Existin ::Saes:,;:..: :.. ...... ..:..::::::: • eement>Dratt<< ::::: :::;''`:>:>;: :'> '>': >:> ::>::<:"'`':' ;.:::'<:>:j'':::: ;::.> ;Lease'Ag[:.::: :;::.::..::.:.::;:::::.<2:ANb 3....::::::::.::::::.::::::::::.. :::::::::.::..:::::..:::. :.:: .::::::. :....:::.:. .. :. ..::::.: :.:..:. ...:...:::::::::::::::::::.:::.:.::::.... :;>:' Nla' :'of:>Ezistin 5'ite'Condi i IVIa`'of View Area%> Ptio oslmu atw s. This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/22/00 08 :28 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0005273 Amount: 654.95 09/22/00 08 :28 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: LINDAHL #5010 Init: JEJ Project #: LUA00-125 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334270-0190 Site Address: 3719 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees: 654 .95 This Payment 654.95 Total ALL Pmts: 654 .95 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 .0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 500 .00 000 .345 . 81.00 .0019 Variance Fees 150 .00 000. 05.519 .90 .42 .1 Postage 4.95