Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA00-127
SEE DRAWINGS) a 0 CITY OF RENTON ‘ /----t,* -- ,---"'"iiiir--4,4, • ii g C 'JILL Planning/Building/Public Works , "4 '''' 0 7 n : T- C.) 0 ' OCT 10°00 :,,, t5.13 - ..j u j r 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 tal- us co k.rftrE' a'" , P, mrtgrt _ ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 1.0: II I tag - er-R S FiT F,.;.-!: ,e,`:7 v ski V.S. POSTAGE 334390 1283 7— Charis Baack 2202NE 24Th Stz4ev.i,..-- — Renton,WA 9805L" ISAAC202 980562016 1499 19 10/19/00 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND BAACK 'CHARIS L PO SOX 2798 1 RENTON WA 98056-0798 I RETURN TO SENDER I , 111.11R 9 Milyr::::-:./741?7--Y) itilsillaitilimillidilmilii 1 11 11 1) 1 I ii 1111 i 1 ii 11 —i— • • 0��,, ®�� • -wNrc�� • NOTICE OF APPLICATION ."_ `• AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION .OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED. (DNS,'M). DATE: October 10,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 24T"STREET PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. • PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under.the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the.Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project,and the proposed DNS-Mare ., Integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION.DATE: ,September.27,2000 ..: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Preliminary Plat approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Single family residential Zoning: Residential 8.(eight dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Development Regulations Used,For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal,,Code,State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King County Surface Water Design Manual Proposed-`Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading Is. initiated; and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual;Appendix D. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch,by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications _ presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used.to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average • weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76-per each-new single-family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written M comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I � t'i]-r------r- 2fl as TJ t�-r--�I--- i , 1 .. I M I. ! ~71 lar'I I ad- if— As I ;II 0 V llij Le 1� iii II III ~ III , 2 .y sr Jt' �' __ $111 @ 121B� 222 2az4222 --Gil rr�-77 -- l41 G, a�Wa 1YY14T+�`�r •-84 f' ..e• 34•s � I 240' r, 237 l;3 aK E ,OD 6.L ERA:_`Ik3__Jl i • I- a ! II ..•1 1 4pq.:K3. .D.D - 252.1 21S - py 21t4 (a 1 gi.___® t. JI.] tf II4tJ .Jt..P ,tQcl1` CAI ., 1,42 �� .t'�r91\rC �ian'�ts' ¢i. 1"241 236 3 -s �,t , s! t tvl i• I O 'd •y 4�. lit. _�L� v M Ill k N. 2 T t.rn Af_ i1 _r7 3 u T , C ' C p ;I r-- 1 „�,w I � 1 f Call I1 € I I I I 1 R I _ 24TH ' . ST I 'L; . u .' ._ ., s -,%., .0 e. 212 `14a 242 E 3 s, a al 1 a s r IJo I 2 .Q4 ,_33 22 RQ• 22 IQlca M ").4V vyc!. e to c . 11'i,_._. ...... ea9N.E 23RD • G4-'t2Rl 'A ! 01,43 ,I, a .•Vr� - NOTICE OF APPLICATION T4 ,m V a2 b ' `"'t r't a T4., Q.0a. NE ' RD ST,. �� 19R•x•ft- 2 a I I 64 I 251 1.9 i p3 , I I IN I 1 I 4I :d a N m I ® I Err 66 /1 a li II i ���LLL.III 1r/ 4"a'� j l III I I I I 2 Ty "3T tt 4L t -- ..... 2312 5753360, 9/69 1 91•• y 4) I I....1I - 3 $ ll) 8 ❑ 222 a Z°222 a 1 1^ i /! (2)� ) I4I `2, gf $ I�1 �H 61/9 P.02�-(4 3 /an03 V> /0.64 /II O� 284' 1 i 5 /els Q 4 I 1g .�--•1 L, I 1 I 240 237 IIa tK E NY D 4 LE�.i 6_p_L _, .• 60 .1 1 L f3Il f pa 9i,, /2 ✓' i ti ',4o9' f ePA' K 3 DD a 300 a4 2 3 5 252.3 2/2 3 _ ••'r 6,, 252.63 66 ur,; ® 252.3 Z6/5 126.1 n 126tsj 3 •6.32 3.62 .LI/V/)I L! !R p r 3 R X I n 0 w 0. . 5 . •0. —333���J.s~ 24I 236 , .223 6 ^ •• ,, 3 r `v b'` 80 1. ay a /0//rr62` s6 .3; 2j'/4r/?z2 I, '!Y 1 :10 76 .1? o— a -� a 4�. .: I ,e,�o�L[ 1 cn D I„ 43-I • D 1 i /, /` N_E_-Tg_.' >, c 1, 0 g 2s . 2 Ql- fr p /0/..32 /•.. N 1 C 111 Z - �Y 2523 1196 112/.3 85l .e 126.15!I 101.33 60 :3 60 _ !4TH '_` ST. '- ''.1 -I l30 I 122',�/62/ `�'. •85/6 63.9S '' ' 4, Oa 60 6 65' 2 j 1 �I 35g 25 'S,W 24 d I'^ �� L�—a _____1 212` .93 ,=11 �s2 VIP `4 9292 Z 5 5 4 0 r e }� so 2'R2 N 2 'W 34 26 .4 23 ' 131' • "13 0 g324 I - /30 I 3 Q g 33 27 o Q . 22 '' ,) 1;,' g t0952 /09.53 I Q l/.037,. 91S6yn ,a �. - w 3 ! T . I° • is N.E. 23R �87 k, 5 E4 A Z R 1� �•b.752•1 0)• 21 22,, .v • 36 r$ lij i g e31.m 303 29$� e2.� t $5 Y $ Q(` P9 20 221{7�, 60 iY'1.6154 !216 me 6858 . \ `+1 ,a4 6902 46 v 3$"e 80 2 N _ 3a J� a s ST 19e 3se 1oe 24 $s3�l�,a—n/.E 23RD r.6a� A,,. _ $r a.�:e. I 1 I — a © CITY OF RENTON � ' .,,� 44 T r(F �shno•CA a mu. Planning/Building/Public Works :- 5 ®00� ,� p 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 DC1.10'0 0 Aral A - ® ,j ® 5 METER 'ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 113 . i.t. tit. :+R:r- F_, (44 .0:s. PO S T A G F 0:1 3343901521 gt:c0z rine Ericco 01) 21E24Th StRen, WA 98056 ERIC125 980562016 1600 16 1O/15/OO RETURN TO SENDER ERICCO MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS • — .- - UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER } l? i ? 1 ?9i ? i? i ? 1ii f I 3 i } �-i F 1 ( j } i 1Sarti}a Yi:�:r a ! t1?: i :?li: ?fit?? :i?° ?i?F? ii}f33si • 6�'VY O� ma C NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON=.-•;; SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED .(DNS.,`:M) • DATE: October 10,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 24T"STREET PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional,DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS=M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. •PPLICATION DATE: September 27,2000' ;c'- P�RMITA NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:, October 10,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Preliminary Plat approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Single family residential Zoning: Residential 8(eight dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project:• Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Development Regulations. Used For Project Mitigation:'=" Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King County Surface Water Design Manual Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install a siltfence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be'disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constricted in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual,Appendix D. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. NOTICE OF APPLICATION I' • 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing pod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision • • to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average • weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at.the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION •:F __-i' Fir,' -ia r__.___r__Tr,s___t.__LTs-.-Ta_r__d___L__z t`j in 1 Y aa' it EInl g 111 , r' 1i 2 H .ST 1+,' �l.'� �' --7.--- �111 $ '2,3 222 'CY`ZZQ H.1�Ir�'l���S}},,�+1 -- 14I 4. 'I .Y 1 14m1 a, , �a9.► R020.84 4i a°,,a s`'s' 1 Igo -/1I I, , m o 1Z1 1 1 240 237 17. ra3KE NYD•LE'z.1_L_._ _.1aa 3 «n ''' r ' �P A'K3 .D.D ' '' • 257.1 z/z.J I • %.y, zrrn to I 4 K=i.® Z. ruUJ • ,r(..f -�/m , Ir •• J9ft I" ,-- . .. 417• \ Lisa l_O �', ' 241 236 223 ' , ; 17 as l� , y�J x -4/ ', : .. D9 y ` , •G frk—r a. t 'rn 4 420. . PF .! - L_.. >, •to i l 3 25 ^ C e Q 9r .rt L�i..l q - Wkl 1 , R urJ l I >s in:, si �,,,T,�'t I�''s j .r: t` 24TH ;r� ,ST \' 4 '.Jl' t 1? .`sh��Ek:'ii+l.r, ..- _ ' • , .,.di ,: i• . , 1o2 _J !12 '$1 rF' �a:24� - - ^t(, a..l ... . rszi __,,_1 4 9rar , 5 4-E .3"3 - ro --242 $ 2 : 34 23 1 R 23 r I.I . �4 1 �, ..�•1 ='C SO I i •QR 33 n isQ• 22 r, .4 '' ..• Ir• A N.E. e � uA en 23RD r ,a+t ,r�6 4 Z R&H J y .9� NOTICE OF APPLICATION 1f .: m J.J. ax§bn V 2z 20 n "� r•1 8 6d. e,>sA. NE RD ST.Q,. a. 1 .- - ,.' E^' —- 111111111111111011 :; p CITY OF RENTON ..Qrr`A --, T Planning/Building/Public Works ���� r 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 OM OCT 10'0 0 cAZ - Q „� Q 5 f.' L401 ET fi ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 1 F.. 1.i. G. t ,ems.`,`. ` i F 4 "I.;".; - .9. POSTAGE 16) ,u — --272000 0050'{ k' • _ . - r Matthew Hough&April Tomala 31427 37Th Ave SW —,—i —`------:- Federal Way,WA 98023 NO SAC: <Y--;------ IRETURN 10 SENnER V' �c .� # w�., .�-:: : .: . . . 1 I1,1„L11.,1i,,,,1,1„G1„,ii„,1,1„11,,,1,1,1,1„1,1;,,11,1 • • rcU .Y p� ® NOTICE OF APPLICATION --' AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION :OF N:ON= • SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS;- M), DATE: October 10,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 24TH STREET PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street . OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of NonSignifican'ce Mitigated(DNS=M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS(M. .; , . . PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 27,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Preliminary Plat approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner In Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Single family residential Zoning: Residential 8(eight dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King "County Surface Water Design Manual'" :4+ Proposed Mitigation Measures: - •: -• . 1. 'The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downsiope perimeter Of the area that is to be disturbed.• The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented In Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual,Appendix D. 'This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications -, presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at tha site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision , to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average • weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, . Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of . record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION j I 1; I P t 9.1 0 ,- ;I ® [ T ] 'pal t 5 l ti t/ Jt2 11 dl . 1 ii '. 2ft JaLly an a .,y �m .-�Y 1 I-../tll.ld•' -- UI $ (21 a NI a a 222 a z y•222 ;IP i Q 4 it", q, ..a. 002C-84_Ii / nsQ+4r 1 li�~ -='/1 - `•O S l y 1 1 ' 240 237 I:z1:KdE�OD LEA.-_L _1 as`i I I •4a \ 1 sPA K D.D I ' 2S7.J tlt iu .' ky tftfJ ii,,,4 K wi.®u• - 15" IIl/T /Sl/r n;i lite+ 6)i „- 40 s'J 241 236 G=2 3 4 4. �s MA�a'�, 1 '" . i— o + rill to® I; * oft P6 ---L• N. 2 i N w p li O _it Mit / 1 , 03 Y J 'I ia i' t 1�; IA, T r�gg L2J I.I If C41ttJ I 1JI 1�, }� /tffS�!' /0/Ji CO ^JI to • 1 u ' / - - li I '.. 24TH ;.r ST. I2 J _j 2R. q" Js- _. 4a1a N'^ 6 B. 242 E W S 34 Za / R 23 -r% • w` arsci joia . N.a ss n 't,— '>. Y `'g'[ 130 I 7 ,QV le CC z2 r ¢ • - - u` - v� ia9N.E 23RD 0 9 tJ :EP 'ru! �T1 ,a"45 a....,: NOTICE OF APPLICATION T16 V 15 - b ' 2 0 'ITT a_�a NE RD ST.,. /v. 19� t- 42 -- „ © CITY OF RENTON it ; ~`z , a _ �a asIL Planning/Building/Public Works r �e `'�' �; 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 w y OCT 9 0'0 0 A a 0 .3 0 ' s FL PI3r SR - to-84 1 tf•s. POSTAGE ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED f��t . 1�.i �xlti �+:f►� �1: � r _ \1 - - , 1,,,‘ , , • o v . , .. 034570 0260 .,,, Deane Teachout 4109 153.Rd Ave SE Bellevue, wA g8006 TEAC109 960062009 1N i�t• 10/14/00 [------- RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELI VERABLE ._ NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE AS ADDRESSED ''UU,- - UNABLE "TO FORWARD tip 81 • RETURN TO SENDER ._ _ JUNABLE4O fORV/ARO - ( -.� RE€URN TO-SENDER: 6 itir ►s• se, •as Ij ! 1' j jI s y } g ] ( }( _ r-�::w- Y-.rA ILI14,11?IIlIl' li!I- I 3??•{!'.1 ] } 7 l :??]S [ ? �S 3'1 1:1 1 l tell'''° d'1 :4 � - .d•rr'_� •.�71 • {3!?1?.i3i. Ifni ? ii 3?.1?!, ? 13 :3. st • ` TY • C�� �� • + a ®.n + NOTICE OF APPLICATION; AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION 'OF NO:N=: --1-- - • SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED yM,) '...=: :, ` -- _ =, DATE: October 10,2000 ' LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF • APPLICATION NAME: 24TH STREET PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15.SF+/-.property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwging units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe?atnily home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. • PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. . Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City-of Renton Is using-the Optional DNS(M).process to . give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.:Comment periods for the project and the:proposed DNS-M.are' ' integrated intoa single corriment'period..-There`will'be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance .of the DNS-M. ' , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: "' September 27,2000._ „-, : 'NOTICE OF COMPLETEAPPLICATION: October 10,2000 'Permits/Review Requested:'. Preliminary Plat approval • Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING:. Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. • CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Land Use: Single family residential . Zoning: .. Residential 8(eight dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,brainage Report Development Regulations . Used For Project Mitigation: • Renton Municipel.Code,.State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King 4 . .. . .c)i ; County Surface Water Design Manual I . I PropOted'Mitigation Measures: ,•. • : ; ;- ii.. 1::;Tlie-applicant shall install'a silt fence.along the downslope.perimeter of the area that is:to be`disturbed.:The silt fence -shall be in place: before clearing and grading' is initiated; and shall be constructed in'conformance.with the ,specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design:Manual,Appendix.D."This--_ _ will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. - • NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications _ presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision , to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average • weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per-each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, . Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of . . record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION '177-_ ___L 1___i__L I SA c tillI ' C I .v°0% oI , 2H it ° 'ST � E"_• 2 • i 1 I ,, t-- u) $ 1214 14) as 22 22 le 4222 1i WI Q 11§ , I ,:% 4, Isei , 240 ' 237 i ca taIKE NYD,L,E •__u_ _1as_� I. Y , .r ” 2PA'K 'D.D ' "' ' ;, s 251.1 az a rrr.o ra 4 w-�=ii i 7JlJ MISim., .•' 3i 'Ir J'3z tip: 41; •lir 1. 236 I.�2.3n7 r' r' imar".l • -00_ ® II co a4 .1. sI. - 1 o >, � 3u N. f , c `� ,0 1 0 r,.,r '� I•i.1' c C ri WFw • p -; •r-- 1 I 'I '' II I & 0 1 24TH r` .ST ; ' :' : ; b�ooy ... ro 't , Ltea 1 e l 'ss 4 2s 4 W N E-- .[ . ,y ' • 9_242 1 2 _W A 3 2e W a 23 • •s.,i . "r 3s n Q• rl Q 2r rra R a -7 ,I, . e - W^ . V' ,i N.E.23RD a I , ,. Ra r. NOTICE OF APPLICATION t m12 20 `W, ,.' -• L/ ' r a ". Ga.. eBAM 4. NE RD ,'aysT !. ma-r ' , -- • CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ACTION NO. LUA— SHPL RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NO. LND— • • NE 24TH ST. PLAT E. 1�'// CITY OF RENTON COR.OF CONSEC.5 23-5 MONUMENT/J69 ELEV.=332.57 FEET NAVD88 PER PUT OF J.R.GATTEN ADD. »6TH AVE. SE VOL 66,PG.65 n 1580.48' NO'J7'03T -� 00� - • E.LINE OF THE NE. 1/4 OF SEC.5-23-5 - 3J2.BI' - - 7247.67• FOUND CONC.MON IN CASE 1 5 NUMI DELTA ARC FOUND CONG MON/N CASEI 1 RAO/US1 (BRASS CAP W/PUNCH) C7 58'08'07" 55.81' S500' CITY OF RENTON CONTROL (BRASS CAP W/PUNCH) C2 JJ'JJ TJ" J2.21' S500' MONUMENT/1837 ELEV.=317.22 FEET NAVD88 CJ 48'47'12" 46.83' 55.00' VISITED 4-28-2000 OF FDEN EIS GARO4 N I q • WAS D�2 Na I 30 M 30' I • OAS SDNI� �EA��TLPG' I I- , ICZ. _ g1L AD ' / ) C.D. r�'GT 22s / I 'S� NB9'0714 \ R/W WOOD FENCE IS I EAST LINE OF THE WEST • o JO.Ol' I FOUND LONG MON/N CASE ON PROP.LINE / —HA�71 2�.3� �,�FO E �'0 FENC�BE REPUC 374 NO'30'47 E (BRASS GP W/PUNCH) ACCESS 611.52' 6� NO'30'477' / / BY NAVY FENCE ON LINE 3 I.'�r 93. / .42� 440OD � x"x�a-X-x-6 •� ,,� CA�ASLAPE NE ' /�/ fin - - / 1 B TAX PARCEL: r—� GRAVEL ORNEV/AY "C�)ZI /JSAT9O-08 AREA'TO BE DEDIT.4 ED X I r*" M y., D ;I:2j/, o ps''\ '� 7D 7NI CITY OF REA{"ON�� 1 `- uII@Ww R/W J D u m• A N0'JO'47 .RPORF1'O G / �1 RLV PNPb.XZ N5579.V/ �• JS42' 50.0' 50.00' J 0.0' uKEOLDAgB r G '' \2j }Y I $(YO'3047'E�I L 9J.49' L',15Bs. - — I ia� HOUSE :�- D , HOUSE O 60.00' i'N � •� — ----J h>J I 20'- r ESMT.FOR FIRE T' F _ •�C4RP0 -� "' I� n.No Y" 0� '£SMl.FOR INGRESS ACCESS N N 2 h ,? 7-3 4 ^)ti I g mI s, • E RESS AND UTILITIES n ",.I n \ m j ;v q o �(/ I m q ..al m 6 n i 6 i 5 2 I © 4 2 2 ( 2 3iai� I Ord �L z rt,, �� I 2 P I ��—TBSBL J L BSBL L BSBL—J LBSBL BOB L! BSBL J L BSBL I 7 C�Z VJ WOOD FENCE/S-� ! L--9421'- J L1 O° J I =pe 6 j I CC, UNE N OF PROP. 4` S W V `( �{ I35.04= v v v v v-v v50,00v 5e00v_ �-v_- ' _�v ti• x , :_ '// W v NO'JO'47T fi15.70'Y-Y -- \ - ,,• WEST LINE OF `FENCE TO BE REPLACED 304--� TRACT 22J I 30,-'BY NEW FENCE ON LINE o •BrizioALL/EDEXISIING STRUCTURES ARE TO --`.0 I I TAX 'ti�l PARCEL- TAX PARCEL •� 2g6 /7280 • /0860 rRAGT JO' .TO' LEGEND: I TREE SCHEDULE: I tI • PUT OR FOUND MONUMENT AS SHOWN TOTAL TREE COUNT t. - 12 TREES • CO. FOUND 1/4 CORNER MON AS SHOWN •6'TRUNK DIAMETER OR GREATER SET 5/8'REBAR AND CAP L.S.29537 POINT/ OESC. INSET 2X2 LINE STAKE 1 ALDER-48' 2 'MAPLE-24' X TRAVERSE POINT 3 ALDER- 70' $ ��- 72 GRAPHIC SCALE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT 6 ALDER- le 7 ALDER- 12' R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 8 FIR- 10' 9 FIR- 10' I Issssssssrsss,.B..'B.I BSBL BUILDING SETBACK UNE 70 F7RMA - 1p' D I1 MAPLE 1 12' I 11 R FIRE HYDRANT J2 PINE- 18' $ 1; R O SEWER MANHOLE ( IN FEET) 'f7 P,, • M CENTERLINE 1 inch = 40 ft. Y� CONIFEROUS P `/:' q�•1' 0 S:I•alai.B yN'' 1 (Ld 9 DEC/OUOUS • °NAL LppO Nla' Q ¢ a umRr POLE / oar �� 0- 0 I 6/4/2000 j OWN. BY GATE JOB NO. EMW APRIL, 2000 JJCON-5A.FLX PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, R5E, W.M. CHKO. BY SCALE SHEET MLS 1"=40' 2 OF 2 ..... . . . A PORTION of the N.E. 1/4, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. .- /..r-riir Armor: .0 R.sr iiiiimnallif ,•,,..!9lr'llilki01.; . . 5. . ,(7 14 iw „ . . --mid_ Li..1a-$1". .1.-•ff., _ . . = .' a —t. . ., ....ia.,,,,,z•,"%.„.1,0 lir lOrk41'7C. likk Mt "4 :1 Or . n: '7 4""' • .• 1.1 A . . . . *,.. ,g,;.ia"' • • ,t*. m . 0"6. ' V • L ; .iki t 41 • • . I .. • • f. VICINITY MAP USiii • • • 2.MK CTI/PT.DEPIN CUSS.0.ASIVIALT COACCEIE NSOtta 2.0//10 CONK own,ONISNED=SALM TOP=ASS 4 ' . 4.1M=Pt DEEM CRUSNO SLRFACINO MSS COURSE gm4A4 OVALft BASE(CLASS 117 MAY OE REWIND PEN • OPIO SOIL CONCITIONS _ Tr4,11_ rwi-- ,IT - ROAD =,,F C.T101,/ Plc 2.:i.41 12. . 1 . I 11 r4 g.4 . I 4. f. / li 11 \ .. i ------ 1 P2 • 1 C / 7 ...---- - 0:Za- —— ''. i' c..AdArNs. Q. : .. • •. I/ / 7-7-- 7-- -ir ..- M..• Ireraiiperk f.- . z I ----- .7,—„,_ . ._ . ... ,,,r„,.., , L. " ill floP...• ,..... ' 'tt 1 I /• I 1 / .., ---,—"--- s .1A 1 ..4"r ------ F 8. . 1 , 6 _ g=r,,-..., . .. c...-_,7 - __.,,,_ G..,• .-4.) §r ) iv y... •, i _ 4-,—.. — \_,1:_i_ . I .. _ Tleelr CB cns g 4.4 , ,- :.:..,c.-,.,.t.,,,, ----- -- --____ —I ,.• _ -- 1 _ ___— ...._0.Pa.c.56.1•4611,5 CM 11, i 2 TL-ra,..77......,.... I 1+ 05 fae . .VP VAT 1.m.vF,•3o2 s R51.!WIT.. CAAD1,1 G ..I. ..%" 0 OUTLEr MI.,2.96 5 ..• OPTTO,..,: 2.5 5. . GUT: 26. GeXet..01-1 vOtOMM.:92.9$ Fr. FILL. zoo FP I !I I i N . WarPON. VOLUME: WAD Fr Der. WM; VEHICLE 1,,C0e95 1.OM PROVO., . ,,...... . ..I . .. . 1 • . . . L.' . ' C I 01 •-I MCGM . --••••..-' k s 0002m L.00.224 I `•-• . -- . . .•. . , 10m 0,200.1 . .. _ — . 1 , le gi0 P2/00; --- ... • ____----- • — # I • i °A1 4400 205. 1,.. GRAPHIC SCALE WOO p.,,,o . • YALE 1. 40' 40 20 4 . ‘03 DM.li0.._1,14— . .. PROF ll.--E_- C0J-SITE ROAD . E.Y-,14.. : NORM. 1.•AO* 1 In..•4d , . . . . . • . . - , •. . . .. .. . _ • . . . . . , ' . . . • . • i. -'s a ,>,,.._. --------- 55 r e e k 54 p a r k 368 1 ,x . J TRI:A 1, y v .1 ......3-------- I i �'` . 21-' b a�700 Y'' N S a' ,r 6 rr` \ • ,,, • w .560, 2 .. 3 6i er'Pyf E 72 e/'''• ,n --P't„ `I`B 2I'9"'io°"2'1'2 :! /' 362 ti \.___.... �•N' _ gr' 1ms os Nx t. °y' 0)6 51 xll'a y ct gJ 5a:6L !\, IMEa,S'1f1w12e `.° 50 v°� � s� 5 N,pzeT P .` [ U _ o R EN TO N W rz4-23-5 / >r oE.ST,A 1-ES s_;r �S'.,,,.,• z a 'on B g �`i 10 9 r 6 21..121'2 12 l - .0' '� .- so�sd;i�i M�� y .°r _ .�•aq� �.�\ 9 L+'g. "4•, �4: �va3 _- /z 5 - '•,tea�o-n�.� �:.. T-,-. -ter , /4. 6161 izi�3"' 's. 7'�]1,3Ad7S a'690e -s T" 1-•_•_c-_ r•5 i�b-•-aeT- 4.s 76 60 11 r-- --- 6 75 1.7 ez ...p '-.i''33 i3, 3c,8 1 e` r" al v� - 24.9 ',^„C� 88� 1 I 1220 I 203 3oe Gov't5.6Lot e 4 9 °' 59 356 A '� I "6°1�r' 2I� Acres 0 2 v z ©�, �� I � 1 3 p ES-ie12f10-J 6_ ° m I 11 -1q /� 2/Ir -ezl_-y .,,r ` r-- /.S ` Lis�63 1----i- L '^ °aW n ei c J Pete, 33123'T. ,y+ ^ ��,�j1 IIJt�1 12 �r(',�ga,'I�I�� avwt�;.•w'c �60 amaei ;.t0 �/;59.=.y'"`, tY.E 17 �s.(ri�'� V 101 li^'I�' ...I F 66 1/ir ••2.9Z Ac 3.2a ac. 35,nc. . d a l u ^ s 27.I ^'N �;� ;�'� 2 Ty i t (\ l3, 8 la) 27: : 3., 'i ? 3;qe °o al .v,i a .Sr ' 4, 3 121 5 P LUA.922186 ^ ' G7._' ..,S.vso p7er-_-y . . 1...,..6 Ii ,' I I l§l \ V 2j 1 65 1' . , II, $to $ (2, a E7 222 8 is a 222 :WI I�I (6,�05/ ,, # ey, T4' a z6z9 l4) 4i 4 Va la l..lV�ill lI a - tuj �y='.\is:, 1 a i 277 t I ZI 41 251:7 E125' c0 6.9m0. -84 i e 3a " a 1\a11,," ='I .-t Z - O- r •12 x 5 ua 90 Qt 'E� 1 x ':Z di 35i 2 =r 9a;ar 3� ° �BKE NY LE .I_.,_�.'� 6a 1, O 6�276 1 a 240 237 II " - x x ° n T t 256 t 4 w U t 2 I ie 1 n e a I 3+II % )e1 -ki ,16 my '°moo - u d;,:e`o !,, �^L ® a a '-, ' ^PA•'Ka,DD " 3°D _ ;,i- , `" + _ 275 1 2� 251$^ a 2." . z o' x 'a„- t6' 1 Ba �` '" 252.3 212.3\I'-, ' , •3• i 251.6! _6a I 1,11i1 _' >o �(f ZSZ3 116/5 /26,3� •612 ),Fio9.62 • 'InJ} Q 1.1y3y� '"(A) '8" ''''7 s 22 s 21 20 119"..I"" ur 0 u8t $ -'z b o 3 R s 7,Mg:;RR l i 33 "-=�'� :I_yJ I'031 E.V. Weoton Y ;.3 -{ a g ryy o2Y �3i1$ --- 338 Ac a/g 0,8el 1B)'� 2 ,Ar;.ac, +a,v1// B'3$I y'.. iG"d - ,I� - n „ 5rr6 'r•I3Et�_ f c�F.L_r>.i,!/ �1,/91 x�'C 52 285 266 Haft, srm-7s <e '� NE.25TH PL., Ilea /� z�1 2542L1. 8a.241 236 3 e°J ! ¢ _p-I �7fy•[!` i �, ,_„� IAi'7- - --� a $$ nri a Li•ml'" [L1 I ..,LJ,Jr P tzg wt. 7 B tx`/�- „025,z ne3 xe, a:,ce I7; q-p�q-�7- `,p/3z�so i. _ %b®'n_n^_ c = 1 5,4 uso2508 W 78 8 • _ Z A 6' 7 e a Ip, 6, 2lJ m N Y • 5 __ • _ i 2 e +ee "rc.s„ l BO A; 295 i� x a x I6 r-,'41ek�b` - , al zJq �!`IO Izz, .1 N.E.0 Q25THA` ST.;,M ,.> B p".3�„„"`' ze6 1 Q 7 3[I., 2 0l a 41 a0 ! •al e .�8 c"+ `[ i '`�25p11�Vl a 2e 67r.1 Josa vn Upsnaw re MEI 21«y R_. 1 au H d w Z cn 4 6Q0.1lz DR I -L-_l-__ C 1 2�8 I I �' z Melvin R.Gray 35 [E { ro„ 303 Ac. 1.94 3, .3.3 a al W,a _�a,s= �' M Z�^ "� ® k N_€_2tA 1I z 3 w .a,° 2 Ug,.,38 .4'„"49�, 261 Etema C N - !I Q alES l4�1 5.'6 29 3 /a z,l .�l0 8 �sx`¢ ---- W Z -ti C 1, Y6.TR.A 1,i9 r_ -� ____y ___18 0� � �Ia 133 _F___1 ^ x 1 J(cl a v 2H 11I I L S'3 it 2„ 2 2 v 0 ,� all o li •1 11fl • I L____ y I 2 3 I 4 • 6 7 B s 9" z�,//'�'�,,,,33 4 !l��F5�, /,6f ,,p 'B': �� z^ 87 0 2 Lu'-�i�i� 1 , 4! $ j� R' LJ r•1 ^m Lnifi ,e.2 " 'nn CtlL Y `- „b.r��"'•,f!: � #�ii it I Q Y J i 1 ,6, 111,�s� &Ica. .,,, , _ . . ci '�-„. 1 fi ,. s ye. 'I!a �-Sf7� 96 u�ssm emz m6 naa„�1„+ -r it b i I96 .r! 9,1 a'.n3 :3 66 6 1 ,=e ao s N.E. 24TH ST. 3°s•' ",$®9 2 N.E,'; 24TH3 ST. " '. v $ _o�xl 7��i �a r�a '" 'rFG e TSduQ r196�--� /.113 63 I I!o �r/a/a-lt9 ,`SI3 /30 / I F66'�ra { �° �y +q �, 2 g� n`di''Iw I Ili'°{„1 lIS I ^ d2 _J 21213 a'/ ...w• S..i 6 - �. 7 ]71 ,„_f-10-__II�� ,111432 15 16. 18 17•, 16- /`5 n�14 13ra 12 1s - x0Y I inPI 11 It+ 'I QS o l _v�i 5 rl �� ` �I eZ r ee -Y6-, 1 I i I_ 13 28 242 �1=' 35 m,. 33,1 32 1 11 29 81, '27 260I 25 24 J 22 21 I$19 18 0113 2' ;s 1 Lm�J ;15 a a syW��E �L1 =T i'°wIE R2 aE xD Oa' II _ r _--" y W e D °r e, s 11e. r9 N la �_-- ; > i_ _ - _ �'a?.y «�I.e p,,.sl I�,a ,.i3 ,�„ A,,.58 0 jam' li, I �.4 h 2 9 v w ,, ' _ ` a N.E. NE. 23RD •,M PL R'�a ^ 1 3 offirmormsQ - ,' a • 25$VFlo is .23RD S , s `al""^31:<." „a :,� a 0 - ``., \ `'- __ Ca ItoAr :' a�.�,•. Q• 21 2z.:� ,,,,,,„ a c 6 i s del°n 6°9x,i,sY @x t ? ,r,i,5„*� a, qa $N ry �s a Z5�39 • ll J 20 . mniii-nwo I n 25 2 3 1 ° 1 5 6 5. V 23R. 9 10 1 3 Il 1 12 `„3 ,.'S'�1, l8 "'' IS \ e 6 _`` ' 1'1` 'm �''16 m^ V ..;..'^2I74 67ieI'1I1�Ft� 2 i 1. 5,' rz a 'S^ a..• v --�P a 1' as 76,• =e9 56 " •` ----- -_---a,:a. N.E. 3RD ST. ` _ e J. $ /L� '-"i�"Q°-rT�II��677T fi-y-{, - �22 27G0 ..19 -T 11 g_ _ 77 �Ii 1. u194 283 273 I" 262 $u,Q 2Sc� _ '' � ''' 71 220 o3 �� „ Q'6.3, J�• I � 1IGJ�� ,„�C �� z "Is r1 71110 I, irk 0, MI g�-1 1 S 0B r12 E03343 At033k 03 s..033 u.•03121' 3 5. 6 -1 (2) 11 F �� 13 14 I'�`]•rP31 Ln JiI,.'/13,�Ai//11 #i fi' 1�7,= , / N10 / 3. 1 I416 • �4 R 0 �! - I•ie 03`� �I,_� .13B�c 03irlGle`0lSAc �g 2 "� 143Ac --- --r--- - !9°7 63°e s N.E. 22ND s S.6 m °� "' t - z- n, F5• "!ES$4� 5�+y PNS-'18 �q i11��11 _v ae ___ _ ___ __ tt _ _______ ,n, » I sam �I S = p `.e,. Ic) "L"1 L"I:, � 1}`-/ __l v 1 s).:}{--, -1 "° -�_'°,t',°m __ • ..a,�y,.: I ' .! e^ ' n�/ .39 ^ is]s+R 8 0ZOAcI 204c1 0 97:-pal t8 a m# g p 6 7 I..2,1 1, 16 a 12 33 it®°,n I� 2'�/6 .rr W,m mz__,2='_ ,._, 210 Z a I -�N.E.------ ? D--^,�aan-_Sl_ .. _ 1 ---- •-1• tI2. . NW7 ,I234 `ins ^„69q 2<..6 �.�? e = I .• 21i4 0VA� 11••1 - 11 #,-[ - ' -- "s r� s - ^ ■ ■�1� 1 a+- 1 1 1 T o• zl „ N $I?,I--�fL� 1 -,1�-1t,�,I z]5 r 8 i ViclIIl 1----=+ 8167 17 :',W 1 :" 31aa 21®• Q ��I� I c�ttt� v `I - R:, Ilir " M1 yYYsi 06sAc J 9�nc' 8 s o6aHc zl Map ,NORTH, A,,,' eoN.E.�i 4 ,IogI�I 1. o„ , . 4 500. C5 0 13 45 E71 S-\.1 1" 2 "a',',. ..�:533."t " -.."', 1„4ni °--=N.E:_ats -,,,,STx�---+ie.x i2 21SZ9;.W itil,Rii- 1} Q 35 , �2 ^�, L 1 - w ,n w, s,lez,I l6+,2�' 1 Su 25 Re_ec,.a Sarcent Y 5 3 „ Date:May13 ,� , .. a 1 a =. 2 15:2 3331,2000- Scale: 1"=200'.' ___" ,� g` - =.9 VHI` ' ,.3 :off 2 ;� ` �' ;ti 15_ W10 :I ,.14.. +60� • 611 • 6 t IT'At 1 `y `7' CO. II • ,.II 1 ei-_," - -;a:1 _111.�..$I 18.`�._^`- '�- - �... Q. a 1, ,./n, r; ,e3_ I?Y•� - .,,? x a7 =Pe. a..,n Smooth Feed SheetsTM Zv"—" Safi dO -127 Use template for 5160® 272000 0130 • 1 272000 0140 , ' 334390 0700 Donald Wik j Shirley Lorrigan 1 Billy Jones ' 2416 Dayton Ave NE 2402 NE 24Th St 2311 NE 27Th St Renton,WA 98056 1 Renton,WA 98056 I I Renton,WA 98056 II , I 334390 0701 ' I 334390 0702 334390 0703 j Billy Jones . , Leslie Job Recor ; D D Eades 2311 NE 27Th St ; 2323 NE 27Th St ' . 2319 NE 27Th St Renton,WA 98056 i Renton,WA 98056 : Renton,WA 98056 11 334390 0704 ' 334390 0821 334390 0822 David Earl Reid Duke&Gail Grant Garret Akerboom 2315 NE 27Th St 2241 NE 27Th St 2301 NE 27Th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056; ! Renton,WA 98056 334390 0860 334390 0861 , , 334390 0861 Keith&Annette Demps ;,1 James Jacques James Jacques 2308 NE 24Th St 1 2234 NE 24Th St 2234 NE 24Th St Renton,WA 98056 1 , Renton,WA 98056 ; Renton,WA 98056 334390 1280 334390 1281 , 334390 1282 Lester Danielson . i Dennis&Diane Mitchell 1 Ronald&Kathryn Hoffman 2204 NE 24Th St l i 2224 NE 24Th St i 2200 NE 24Th St ' Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 334390 1283 1 ' 334390 1321 334390 1335 Charis Baack Joel&Maria Cervantes , ; Bernice Andrew 2202 NE 24Th St ; 2225 NE 27Th St ' 1 2201 NE 27Th St Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 334390 1340 334390 1441 334390 1480 Neal&Patricia Lettich City Of Renton ; City Of Renton I' 2207 NE 27Th St 200 Mill Ave S , ; 200 Mill Ave S i Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 : ' Renton,WA 98055 I 334390 1481 334390 1485 .' 334390 1521 City Of Renton City Of Renton Danny&Corrine Ericco 200 Mill Ave S ' 200 Mill Ave S ' 2125 NE 24Th St Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 ' Renton,WA 98056 382350 0010 : 382350 0020 1 382350 0030 David&Beth Peeler ; . Carlee Alari , Richard Bogart&Gregory&Bra Bogar 2614 Camas Ave NE ; ; . 26Q8 Camas Ave NE ' PO Box 2017 Renton,WA 98056 ' ' Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 382350 0040 , 382350 0050 , ' Marcel&Laurie Dehart , : David&Joann Campbell Iii , 2605 Camas Ave NE ' 2611 Camas Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 ; Renton,WA 98056 ' 1 nAVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® i Smooth Feed SheetsTM , I Use template for 5160® 034570 0010 034570 0020 034570 0030 Mark&Susan Turner Katherine Gentile Penny&Wesley Price 2315 Blaine Ave NE . ; 2311 Blaine Ave NE J Linda Renton,WA 98056 . Renton,WA 98056 I . ' 2307 Blaine Ave NE 1 , Renton,WA 98056 034570 0220 034570 0230 034570 0240 Quynh Hoang&Mai Ha Clarence Jahn Tracy Alan&Cynthia Jean Russell 2320 Camas Ave NE ' 2326 Camas Ave NE 2332 Camas Ave NE I Renton,WA 98056 1 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 034570 0250 034570 0260 034570 0270 Mary Wolfe Duane Teachout Elisa Truitt&Eric Ek , 2317 Camas Ave NE 4109 153Rd Ave SE 2309 Camas Ave NE ' Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98056 034570 0280 034570 0320 034570 0330 Michael Prabucki ; 1 Duane Keyes , Matt&Dawn Wilkinson 2305 Camas Ave NE 2302 Blaine Ave NE 2308 Blaine Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 , ! Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 034570 0340 034570 0350 : 064630 0050 Kristin Harrower Michelle Gamelin ' J E Phelan 2314 Blaine Ave NE ' 2320 Blaine Ave NE 2401 NE 24Th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 064630 0110 , 064630 0120 : 064630 0130 Dj Jenks ' , Peter&Darleen Wimmer Lakin Family The , 2325 NE 24Th St i 6011 121 St Ave SE , 2301 Dayton Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98056 272000 0010 1. 272000 0020 272000 0030 N R Mcandrews 1 Charles&Theresa Bohanon 1 Michael Bates 2312 NE 24Th St I I 2417 Dayton Ave NE ' 2425 Dayton Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 272000 0040 272000 0050 , ' 272000 0060 Ushani Nanayakkara Matthew Hough&April Tomala 1 Mark&Danette Mcnulty 2501 Dayton Ave NE 31427 37Th Ave SW , 2517'Dayton Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Federal Way,WA 98023 Renton,WA 98056 272000 0070 272000 0080 i 272000 0090 Joseph&Lori Macauley F Metz I Peter&Darlene Wimmer 2525 Dayton Ave NE I 2524 Dayton Ave NE 1 6011 121 St Ave SE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 272000 0100 ' 272000 0110 272000 0120 Kathleen Palmer Kurt&Kimberly Jahn Peter&Suzanne Olson ' 2508 Dayton Ave NE 2500 Dayton Ave NE ' 2424 Dayton Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 ' Renton,WA 98056 II AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® � ': - 1AEGER -ENGINEERING ,.. : 941 9 S: 204 PLACE - KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 . _:. . . ' ' " PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAX (253) 850-0 i•55. ; . `Sept: 12, 200® . ' ' 2. • • - •--,13 ' r,;�J�P',_O;J ., • • C1T 11 • . - ' PRELIMINARY.DRAINAGE REPORT'. • „-, • . , , • JACQUES PRELIM.'PLAT'.' - : ' . • ; 11..LOTS ; ' 2232 NE 24th STREET.. _ , . RENTON', WA. : PREPARED FOR: . Jim Jacques,_ ' • ' : 2509•Aberdeen Ave.'NE; ' - • • `' • ' • Renton, WA: 98056. ' ' : . r i' .�41 •' ' :(425) 255-2362.. . • • ' °. - i1P .' s . -- ' PREPAREDD BY: • . _ ,--f-, � '''' • .'_ ; James J `Jaeger, P.E. �1 . • u TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW II. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE J • I. OVERVIEW The proposed plat consists of one existing residential lot with a total area of 1.78 acres. The proposed project will subdivide this lot into 11 single family residential lots. There are two existing houses, garages and other improvements currently on the lot. There are no wetlands, streams, ditches or other water courses on this property. The property is bordered on the east and the west (the "long" sides) by existing large sized residential lots, similar to the subject lot. The middle of the western property line is the low area of the lot. The existing drainage exits the lot at this location and flows onto the neighboring lot to the west. There are no drainage improvements currently on the site. Water, sewer and power/phone can be accessed from NE 24th St. along the south frontage of the property. The existing driveway is connected to NE 24th St. near the east side of the property. This will also be the location of a new cul-de-sac road that will connect to NE 24th St. and run along the east side of the property to service all of the proposed lots. There will be a half diameter paved bulb and the end of the cul-de-sac. The new internal street will be a public road. There will be a sidewalk on one side, the west side, of the new road. There will also be a short private joint driveway that will service new lots # 9 and #10 from the end of the cul-de-sac. The road layout was reviewed and approved during the pre-application meeting process. The internal road will be 28 ft. wide and constructed to City standards with asphalt surfacing and vertical curbs. The property in its current condition has a few trees and is primarily covered with tall pasture grass and brambles. The trees are shown on the preliminary plat map. There also is a fair amount residential landscaping associated with the existing houses. The site slopes down from the east, north and south to the low area in the center of the western property line. The average slope is approx. 3% . There is a steeper up-slope near the northeast corner. The proposed drainage will be collected by catch basins within the new road and routed to a detention vault. The vault will also serve as a water quality.enhancement facility by providing dead storage volume under the detention volume as allowed for a wet vault. The site soils are of the Everett as mapped by the SCS soils survey. Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 .:PROJECT OWNER AND . - PART 2 ' PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner `.11M J PtC�L -.5 Project Name Pt cut- AddressZ50q Pcbe • N E- Location Phones 5) ZS?-7- Z3(p2 Ravi** Township 23 t.d Project Engineer Tt rr i o e c V' Range �5 VV Section Company Project Size I• 1(o AC Address Phone 94'1 ct S. 204 1 • Upstream Drainage Basin Size 1`411/4 AC 253) 2SO—of3d- PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS S = 'Subdivision n DOF/G HPA Ti Shoreline Management n Short Subdivision (n COE 404 Rockery n Grading n DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults Ti Commercial . n FEMA Floodplain ?4I Other I I Other 11 COE Wetlands n HPA PARTS SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Re.Y\ On Drainage Basin Lo 1,0 C�d�— R v ( LC Li W ask c -- i PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS:. I J River a Floodplain ( J Stream it Wetlands I J Critical Stream Reach Seeps/Springs I Depressions/Swales =! High Groundwater Table I Lake — [ Groundwater Recharge I I Steep Slopes Other I J Lakeside/Erosion Hazard N ONE- �^�Ml?,�,��, `j� +,�.:r,,.tr-����r�',� ��`r�� r�� ;�..� ..?£t.'�'�Yr" 4..`L��t 3��.'�'w'-z r .,•, _,.s �cy?; So!!Type. Slopes Erosi n Potential Erosive Velocities `_., Additional Sheets Attatched 1/, Page 2of... • d - King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS . . ` • 0 REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT n Ch.4-Downstream Analysis p ext arck--v\- 0 L tr O Cl O 0 Il Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION r�,�FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 0 Sedimentation Facilities ,gy, Stabilize Exposed Surface I Stabilized Construction Entrance Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris CSZ-Clearing and Grading Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities N. Cover Practices 0 Flag Limits of NGPES KI+Pt Construction Sequence 0 Other 0 Other .; PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM . 0 Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank El Infiltration Method of Analysis Pipe System Vault El Depression S13 U I-I 0 Open Channel 0 EnergyDissapator Dry 0 Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation Pond 0 Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage Wet Pond Stream 0 Regional Detention 0 0 Brief Description of System Operation Co lj av\ 6 /' s4-t- - 9xo- e,5 �S, i G - ,4 v� -7 wet d t P ..{ Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation FT Sheets Attatched 7PART 11STRUCTURALANALYSIS °PART121FASEMENTS/TRACTS .; _ lMay require special structural review) X Drainage Easement Cast in Place Vault I 1 Retaining Wall (� Other Access Easement I I Native Growth Protection Easement 1l Rockery>4'High 1 I Tract 0 Structural on Steep Slope I 1 Other i PART 14 SIGNATUREOF:PROFESSIONAitNGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual 1 site conditions as observed were incorporated into this woricsheet and the anatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. `�I Sp a ." 1nn - 6A`ta 70 1b :.3 . :. -y9 Q • -- ,Itl AY NOINil n —3 ^Yrrl 1 .e1r-1_ E: "LJ,,, ltal ` 1 ' Z' r 3s A o •31 Is A xl ? {>• I IS AV0 OCI I4 g sct .. �� �xA � Qti y' 1 ��jj .� Y h j' 7� 3ti' pT �'. l. Kl " xo R �„ %ioM xg` ti ,� 6.1;,,IE a Ti.ir .`'?�,.1 a `J 3N AY {� 1m i a ,r L� P IS �,tA �r1 :TH Atl S ' � F•:+�• 14 5NEE10N =I✓i 1 ��••• z' ON01g3N ,�NI n - i; �' `—gy '�— � �' 1 __ Ng G is .• . E Viiiii• +�r,rl 7IN�pa ^ Y %" 7S-5d NI[t .! {!Sa-[ • ' 3 I, .. z--. t M ^, - rl G iiiiiiiiiii., FE- ++ M^ �r s 4'' p ry �,. ':, ,s I __ i. �jj2 �' 4 AYS 4 .rtt �h•, 1w�.. _ _ �L _ Nr .�. Y^ �'Ur0. 1'•"'yr(1 E.�i 4,. '. C '^lase C„%.f G' KH1 ZI �i. .,,`��;F,:.•, ... , i ' 12 '�'Y - �I ArY ��� r r I .tr a C t d ^ ' ''' Mo[ f 4 J \ 1 • A t •� ritAY M3 IL.: I'd � fi 5 w I t r+•.r" ,Sr +r fit. r tl yJI • TA•N'i Ru911-iGP V�'/ ` �.,, ,.•.r .' °N'�ur`f: 'f$' �� S17frG37d Idr ++ _A'r NI A= ftl ,uvi oC 126TNq � - .t�-r.s, ,;•0,•1•. y! qq, 8 �acYay' ."� - J 'DD69_- -� t —dS4• - `'' �"`-t':�: Fl.t�'-. �`'la,.unc.- r3H^®�- � ^ C•r �. .1. K1,Vi' �; •t�8 �� 1. tv � dHAIO � ,• _C SF AV U psl tN1' $ C:/,>:. �J - rREAyr-s �c- i .1e le 4lAY +iEO.n '? �'' � ' ',�S� µ1 �KEG �k. yN r V� � ��' R AV ONZZI n • // i 1. Iu +.. is Aif1�1 3N `�ii F--_-.. 17� rn , ' V 11 fy( �Nttl Iti_ � 6 2 ..`aL%�^ �hW 1f�tiT�~ �St tl qua-x� it7r � t� � ( �k�c Stfy � �r•�� i € � �f ODDI AY Ol o3�lNOH r °� 8 h r r 1� Sri ;i i 'G G.r J�II' Yi OOOMNNAI o s Ai ISM '�i) r k N 4// ,. St ►+ sf 7p { r r Yl 'r p �! 1'A111s X16111- I r SS nu BAH _II I.F I N LSE. a A• o 3N Ai irle �� � '^ •. %Otl _ 1 i�- I M Ar A, o N31Hr1MaIM :41''‘::.2'-'4. .,a E ONYI>r,ll ■. Insvunr4 6/1sm 1191N •> r• , Ia . .E G' sAln Lx Ara - , ctudsN ll1 v, o, txn4 ��j� p' _-1,°y,�j �d r V HOSa3i13Ctq trl sAnu '^ t•4 NlYll I1S NOl ISN371) YI� a111W'1K � v:, `Q' 3Y ' 3S n t1 + • �" ��� r x Ar><7oN1 q .II �//xl ,uell, O �. u-- _ �'.(• y.P t N 1•-.j'•f,:' \ b • y I = ii1MN§ H191I 7S AY '!1� I.+ ?♦ llrOgf. 1ir q ,p G N 1 3$= �1 AY Yi_�-....J�- �' J wm § 2-bl�- Illll f?I /F4a !x AY r�� 3N y '....111 o.,F`,� :::::' NO Opp ,AY J npNOlON• !—� �... /w '1 a.. N Ww laat Ntsl ^is n G xis i H19I I N N r —' TRlglr h�� :a,Dz I, �� .A1�Zl _°T s 2 F.G- 3.t( , is l�t IN,+l l Xia % . l is__ J t�C,l t3N �11 AV r r Y SO 0'3 ' frr ,� ~ \ ,, " ♦jw Ni,.. r g tt a Hlb 4� 4 ` Y� .t= L vrl�i,+Td HlCI! •-- I� a$^ �`t� I f � :`!�•J}r:+. I , NOLiYO w r 532N AY �NOlA r � � to �',, r k` 15 � Arl WtII W h � ./�' ;,�'�'"iu' 1 3N ��.T'c SYIfl)yr r � +r lou�7 1 '� � a,UM I �� �, IU1N'� ► Q h ;Ac .\ A A JI I I +.yam•; 1 Ql • 1� --—--— !129EdC Si. �4�E. _ `,f'r Y, S )xln9 3N ldti sit a SVNy, sMKJ , + „r 11 Aj �'; �! S j-gr N i1, NNIAVV 3N AiIjAR,� - I v -- �[ e' E �1� r. i, •':I }- .Li r AY 3NI I � �y 3s OA'� �- +� 3N y `� Q� A UI•J ,,. nanlala = I • Jn G OD(K :IF i. Y18 �2fc�--� .�jv Ig! - ig y/t3L�yyAr N33ON7B —y r. ��` 2$H N1O3NII 11 AY r�til G Nl0�ll1T ;N' .p: 1 i-• "�M)I`r 4 i o 7 Aitill �►I = .0ram+Ar xllcq� tlF,l_ _ ! N_a G * +s 4' '> _ t1 I r�.plG I. t ��T 31 .r/� la 1\\ 3N -A�»NNp('' .•�ft,\1t1� PNC:CIL p'z pq= 3N Al M i 3NN3M �c "inn =� ' — -- []�l1 I� G 3N AY ally g\ � el ``--- 3N Ay H'JIH 1 M 53NOP • ,��ea� _1.t . Ibvt7i. .. 4G AM8J N CI .•-•-•4- r• r ,.`.` AY\ giiii lall ■alet �(' r>r fir. _ , 8,v' !`- r 'j':6 �µgEN 1v. N • ,1- �• `. ) • I� ICWA '.rlrllftl l+'F ':.•-1 , Ji 1 z N r'• I a.-a.s. © 11 g / \\ \ _ ti a \ 1 _ I i t „ fS AV H196`.y•• ; 1 o,n r�MS rxn,y - --- �r' 0.1VERSIDE#�Atr, Mr, s►r Nlrb f _ . N�- i ��Dtz`:.. 5'. ery A9� „ N AR RIYCR 1 A-'e-.pi. .- I�...- ••'• 3... 0� QED SE 1 1 11.� a,1Q0 :K'3�q26 IA 11. • J i l }, O i, ' nr. 7 . I_ 'E1 pt �; 915T 11 sf r;'•l ,1� ),� AyNi 15��a•\✓• �F`,,\ inl IYIIIAr tG.: !4/..y -1, • s' ''. \ JC ! ,Iw d, 1 n til •r ILin y ten-7 i r:'...›4 i vt `� ' ' • J- • Lv cil .It J`ii \ . �' a: I c13. Z • mIomp r: •frl • , x,,,,, 4 co . . . • ' '' •.1 P• fiti,.•.•A'.`. .7'%*4 as: ".111 o - oil ii'H., 3 .: _- Ur.:,.'v` • _t � \ � J m m �� C.Y/ i C I „ _ • _r " r - • _ •rr dir • m ,vC:f.�...�) .;°d I. 1 -' / y'�' I ) ' b7'•a.F�•" ,„i'' _ t'T� . -?rA,,zi.+rd h' `.?jut. �Cr.'" /�`%� Bed •�' �� r �`t• `I t ` I - 414.% ,.:.a{• �i3t+,l,.: :.4r:..:a•I��r;p / °Oo���� $� ® ue 1r . �$7 a1111 r _ ._ - .; _.,,44,3„.7}.,,tv,. tilOwel) ik, Ilis../. Si"! --. ,,,c,. .) ib., ,,,- •:.:.1® • ... ..la A• Al c)* •..•��.y• .• U.-� ;>• ' t' irk 'I pa • ,, ,'f:- w 10.1 `t�? % aT,•e� ,� .� r _,.. 'l••-..Q1 Ey , nil ••'1;'C cA'm ;Y,..Q. "�•U IO '1 f. ti l5 �'� $ r '-U�—I xh •`y`�L ...,00,::.1 17.... =— --. , IV) .., i......._'.._ . • :.,••. ''':. ;•• •- ' tormimilet''..,.*.;!' ''' ,i'Ll• 1,tE)a9 1p-' ...- • ai A __-----7--.7---.- •••N, is•14 ,. , ...NI awl. ..4111hallillin MI I .: I I -111111...1;41.11 '' '' ; , 41&..SiTiti.1 . V'• elnil,'1:. 0 • II 10 im .. . ,,,...,.: f.,,. ..:' : .„e.7.1c.;....:Jr ...:.."0, _.,. 'ime, ,iv.-.. .. .-.1, 1. :..,,, . .,. .e .. , t4.6,,... 11/4 e 1111111"-r .-. c'..!.-•":::IN., ., •o • m_ ' v F j`,; --1. .3S _-a \11.:7 c4o-.4.,,4...._ •4� .. .• .1 't'... �:•..'. Q `'I,c.11 • IpI 1,•• 'D7 1 r 1 ____._(''' • % •\°' ..• U '"T.WINtiI- ---rit ••• • . . ' ...,,--- .94r).011; .„' "..I .L4 • ill •., ..., ., . /. . y iftmai . . . ,iliatill .t. N \• Y `" S 11+ . • �' c•• In.r`:yL•1 ' . 1 a. ^k. 11111 ., '_ ii ... irn•')"r • .'*t7 � •t,ffir-,.t_.. .,,,......,,....... l/ • / 'I" fu ,• ,i • eI — iJ`' :--.• ` - • 2 ..• ' . , 1,1)1& - • IAA.- A:• . ., M O• .\ • LANE C / .' \, •1/r _�_�il/ • LANE y T�IL . •.,-, N ... • ii a y.co 1P a .. . . •— � �: v od imam i'itt\N c) . .., : .•: . .v � pQl • • al ''... :- 0.? 'tilititiox„ .. ,. .,'. 4,0*.Liory,o,, ,...4.,e,..#14, -,-7.,,;.1 ..... \Att,$.: :. , I p !. • I ; ialtj._ .. , •ca.i rig,;,,. • . . . . 75 .{;'��.:all�+:7�"'•-:,.4� '•'?,�'' k1" Y 3 l N j 1'in ::'f{ih�F:MiSk?�.:1.i.}'':C.;:'. •' F • L • II. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS 1. Discharge at Natural Location: The site will move the discharge point from the center of the west property line to the southwest corner. The runoff will be piped to the frontage street, NE 24th St. This is preferable to continuing to discharge into the middle of the neighboring lot. The drainage will re-combine approx. 400 ft. to the west. 2. Off-Site Analysis: An upstream and downstream drainage analysis has been performed and is detailed in section III of this report. 3. Runoff Control: This project is providing peak rate runoff control for the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events using a detention vault with an orifice type flow restrictor. 4. Conveyance System: The project will provide conveyance piping for the street drainage and the lot roof downspouts. The piping will be sized to handle the 100 year developed storm event. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan: An erosion control plan will be prepared and will be included with the engineering plans. This erosion control system will include silt fencing along the west property line, construction entrance, seeding & mulching and clearing limits. A sediment pond will not be proposed because the amount of grading on this site is very minimal. 6. Maintenance and Operation: The improvements to this site will dedicated to the City and will be maintained by the City. The private driveways and drainage piping will be maintained jointly by the applicable lots. 7. Bonds and Liability: The appropriate bonding and insurance forms will be secured prior to any construction on the site. SPECIAL DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS There are 12 special drainage requirements that may apply to any project. In this case, none of them apply to this project. III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE The upstream offsite drainage contribution to this site should be accommodated by the drainage system that will be constructed within the new plat road. The property to the east slopes onto the site. It is now a large residential lot and does not generate a significant runoff volume. This volume can be handled by the new road and by calculating a bypass flow through the vault. The property to the north also slopes onto the site, but this is only the rear yards of a smaller lot residential subdivision. These flows are negligible, but can be picked up by a yard drain in the new lots connected to the drainage stub that will be provided to each new lot. There is no contribution from the south side, which is the frontage of NE 24th St. The runoff from this street currently sheet flows to the west down the shoulders. B. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE The drainage from the site will be discharged from the detention vault in the center of the west property line and then piped to a new catch basin at the north shoulder of NE 24th St., at the west boundary of the plat. This new catch basin will also collect the runoff from the new gutter that will be constructed along the north side of NE 24th St. as the frontage improvements for this plat. There currently is no existing drainage system within this portion of NE 24th St. As such, a new pipe will be installed within the north shoulder of NE 24th St., running to the west. This pipe will be a 12" CPEP pipe with a slope in excess of 5%. It will run for approx. 250 ft. and will be 10 ft. deep at the edge of the plat. It will get shallower as it travels west. This pipe will discharge into an existing (recently installed) catch basin within this north shoulder of NE 24th St. This catch basin currently collects.drainage from the north, along the east side of the elementary school. The runoff from the existing, undeveloped site would enter this catch basin from the north. The outlet from this catch basin is to the west within a pipe that runs approx. 100 ft. into another catch basin, a type 2, within the north shoulder. This catch basin appears to be in the low area of this section of NE 24th St. It collects the runoff from the pipes and a portion of the surface runoff from the school site. This catch basin appears to turn the drainage to the south and across NE 24th St. where it r • _ C_4 • 32 T24N R5E E 1/2_ _ 7:41(..1(1,1.14:4304.J.111 Yvr►.Jr .:r-:y I! Tr'., ifj.-' / ?�w�rinr11I'dt� ''� Pillt :1,-.::',417:4:-.;€:,,/;"."(' T��1};.��i ,.� � ,P�� •l` '�.d4:`.�;\.hm�`\\�����y` / \: 'r;+a`�.�s�14\1 1 t•�� ��h'�..,, :Iti�...,� �IP / 1'!:\\ \�cyl��\�c.K>i 1..• .ASy...\' � • • i,, ‘ , i . ' itiC*11104011151°0 111 - , • ., 1cS.'".. iiihrh • \• , `5 1 a.. :.........„..\,%,‘ \ • , vi. al mui i I • 7 aii__ i3 �a.. ,1 • .. mr11 .J111\'‘'‘7 "‘(r3�=_•-ONIN 7. `\1. 1. •� ♦. • i -----/ ,� �p�� ' U M■ sari c:,.:-p.\ ♦`` ♦- -- 1, I :♦..,�` _ __ __ _ _ . II rs os . N ;,-,;.,, , "I 11 �• 42-1 . ��■,�mow ,\; ,,.,. I,f `\ leau---. ....--z N�z' 1 , , - \\I:r=• , , �'Y•l!*trc.t,.7q^� �.""1rt __I , 1, ,---,)�\_ ; . Mil ��MI z �-•:-.-� _1,1 wit- knickmagg, -,- ,--„,.-- •Panz-i--,,•.1, , --, ... - 1 .s. . 0 - ' . --.-114' 11111111101.1111 . k ba k,.....„,...„:„...,,,,i,ii.,,, z_...,..,i,,,,.‘ \ ;.,.. et . . �: Iliftllii• �il� _ \-\�: -S1 PAM Lam is -iit' I / S ffii lit 11115:7--'alli NIIIIIIAll ! att� E �,i �; may':' -t :1? iRI ),, - � N, 2,t ,t, +, r.�p. .�) 1 ppm ! zi. Iir ' rogr IA :,- ova -:1, I.. eJ. g it 11. Alit rripit-): :..- 4t ''' \ V\ c:27 9 Itilt.t%, , ....j • o S.�4-a .1.0 -. ffila 1111 ',.', j 1 • . '.!it ; i .. .--3.../II I ly.i' : \. ,.. istr. .\. ,s ., . . . ,,,s , ., ,ss i . . ,. . . :Inuni or ..!„ ♦ I ( 1_.......\\... ,.....1 I I I' l i ti,!r!I'\:,,,. '•`�;. ... i; 1• " `•Q �I�I it •7ir._} 3r,d `t, 9�4.�� 4 : „,m11,1, -'ti �\ �\ .`� ilr,ilrl,Il;-• • 11"1`' \\i•� I'MI _lo • ;UM •- _ Fi 1,,�'///71,�,1 \\1 'L\.1`rrh11111 Elm -.Mr"12.0.34- N... r 11: U1 1 1 Ir r ,r I v -•-\ ��� g 1, M �� , t�Ti II \\ 1 .� ti• v•11II� 1;Ilil \_`..._i 1�\\�� -CO ` •�� BUN !KILT e , ,r 'mil l t�.-Iv pI\._-_ „�,',.r.- -_ -- `N L--''?rril� � � � 1 - �r1111 i I� jg I1 \\\\ i 1� 11 \I 11 fir` IL\ . T 6. 4- • IOi J _ • °� �' � app® �! NE no®� li l`.Tee I Ili 1 11,11 (, ! - -- - \ ra12.1111. O. '‘.•likk 9.13- lI� ir Z p.1I `. `'- .113 .' In 41 hp.] .. ill,.- l -,1 19 ` �`;� 11 r'i PIAr.,,,,,%/ �' ��I� �t�lii �Si �� i ek f',' f4 ` �\ Mai J 1 ` "t l I ! �' �- , �1.11�/A`_ i 7-+ IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE The drainage from the existing site currently sheet flows towards the low area in the center of the western property line. This area will in turn. overflow onto the large residential lot to the south. This area is characterized by few trees, with a fairly dense understory of tall grasses, native shrubs and brambles. There are no drainage improvements on the site. The sheet flow eventually ends up along the east side of Aberdeen Ave. NE, which is downhill, to the west. The drainage flows across several properties, including an elementary'school. The existing frontage along NE 24th St. in not yet improved. It has a gravel shoulder. The total site area of 1.78 acres was used as the tributary drainage basin. The existing drainage analysis was performed using the "Waterworks" hydrology software and its summary tables and charts are attached for reference. The methods outlined in the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual were used as guidelines. Following this page are the data sheets used for the computer input data. The computer summary sheets for peak flow and time of concentration calculations are also attached. Below is a brief description of the existing drainage characteristics: Time of concentration: 35.45 minutes 2 year peak flow: 0.03 CFS 10 year peak flow: 0.07 CFS 100 year peak flow: 0.19 CFS total area: 1.78 acres pervious area: 1.61 acres curve number: 65 impervious area: 0.17 acres curve number: 87.6 (includes gravel driveway) Jaeger Engineering JACQUES PLAT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PREDEVELOPED HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A10 NAME: PREDEVELOPED, 10 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : . 1 . 61 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 65 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 35 .45 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 17 Acres CN • 87 . 60 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 .2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0333 PEAK RATE: 0 . 07 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min BASIN ID: A100 NAME: PREDEVELOPED, 100 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 61 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 65 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 35 .45 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 17 Acres CN • 87 . 60 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 .2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0333 PEAK RATE: 0 . 19 cfs VOL: 0 . 17 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN-ID: A2 NAME: PREDEVELOPED, 2 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 61 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 65 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 35 .45 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. .": 0 . 17 Acres CN • 87 . 60 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns :0 .2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0333 PEAK RATE: 0 . 03 cfs VOL: 0 . 03 Ac-ft TIME: 960 min I, ___ 1427) _ L 1 '© — g'L' ( = cam°' - �J cry-e �a 4 h lira$ s t a L�' v, iv .0- 0 pi\H Qs Y 0"\ S sno l /7� Qsdi L ' O = c CL (2) = J� L. crI C L)o'Q 4.�(2, 7 C Q = M 'vu /.�►-a9wc c-1') sc.'ot �au,► ra.rr\pigram . , a; L _ --)kt (3010 ds cab2 = y -bz �- CND = t � '-'u b0 O = d71b' 67LZ _ ,2IA C�--h-o0 j2S -b g - 1 C-12-N 2-1 ; c'o LI 'as ' E cog'1 _ ) ?2 -►OS '.roJ./iockc 'z =is cc,/ = 1 E► >c 112 a-1 G Pci 92 4 111 x rt7t7 Y,caSI") tea c) sc,vnna2.8L.L1l I--{5 WcmN "1\�1Cr3 ' Z .S gL, I = S ILL = $1 s t243_. �` d NI-V Q'ScK7-121���t i • • Pam . Dom, 3 • TirnE OF CANc -4• 1R uN �,; �..� Ei....,� . Zoo --Pt -�I m P fr e tz t- 1 �P-- o Y r " 3 101 14-3 (ems fb.0 k nt- r, 5W c o t-tnst.)r- I of a, kre-- Z" c 3 IZ - 3,33a/ 300 S . 45 fn k n vte 5 (see, o...- Cath-A f%A-Q-1r 3\9-24') � . Pt_uvirL fw = 3.9 in . S . PRE-D \ 105110,_ FLOW O� Dz = ,03 S ��,,_ 6 ,0-7s File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee;eeeeeeeeee; O 0 SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET 0 0 O 0 0 0 °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 . 2400 0 ° °ARE°Flow Length (ft) • 300 . 00 °HOICES ° °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 0 0 °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0333 0 0 °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 35 .45 0 0 °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A 0 °ABS° 0 0 °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 0 0 °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y ° o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 .2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 0 0 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 .2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 0 0 °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 0 0 °CN °Dense grasses • 0 .24 0 0 o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 0 0 o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 0 °TOT° 0 0 °°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete 0 o Pgaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefit 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee \DF) ._-- ter\! r_l -o P V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE The developed project will include the new concrete detention vault and wet vault located in the on the south end of future lot #8, near the west/center of the site. It will be located within drainage easements for the respective lots. The site drainage will be routed into the vault using catch basins and pipes located within the new road. Each new lot will be furnished with a piped drainage stub that will be connected to the street drainage system or piped directly into the vault with a pipe in the rear yards of the lots. The areas used to calculate the flows were the same as those areas used in the predeveloped drainage calculations. It should be noted that the frontage improvements were included in the detention calculations because there is no physical way that the frontage drainage can be routed into the vault. The detention vault was sized to meet the performance criteria established by the City of Renton standards. This criteria is that the vault can only release at a rate not to exceed the 2 year predeveloped peak flow while retaining the 2 year developed peak flow. This is the same for the 10 year and 100 year peak flows. A 30% additional volume factor of safety is added to the detention pond design volume that was calculated for the 2 year and 10 year storms, as specified in the King County Manual. The 100 year storm volume is not subject to the additional volume factor. The site does not have the area available for a biofiltration swale. Thus, a wet vault will be used to meet the water quality standards. The wet vault will utilize the detention vault and will provide the required dead storage below the detention live storage. The volume for the dead storage will equal the volume of the water quality design storm, the 6 mos. storm. Per the King County Manual, the 6 mos. storm is calculated using 1/3 of the 2 year storm isopluvial. Similar to the existing condition, the SBUH hydrograph method was used to determine the peak flows for the various storm events. A level pool analysis was performed to evaluate the pond performance during the various required scenarios. The computer data sheets for the developed flows follow this page as well as the works sheets and the time of concentration calculations. A brief summary of the developed drainage characteristics are: time of concentration: 7.02 minutes 2 year peak flow: 0.38CFS 10 year peak flow: 0.60 CFS 100 year peak flow: 0.91 CFS totaiarea: 1.78 acres pervious area: 0.84 acres curve number: 68 impervious area: 0.94 acres curve number: 98 Jaeger Engineering JACQUES PLAT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS • DEVELOPED HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B10 NAME: DEVELOPED, 10 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 68 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 . 02 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 94 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 90 . 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0670 PEAK RATE: 0 . 60 cfs VOL: 0 . 25 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B100 NAME: DEVELOPED, 100 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 68 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 . 02 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 94 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 90 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0670 PEAK RATE: 0 . 91 cfs VOL: 0 . 37 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B2 NAME: DEVELOPED,, 2 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 68 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 . 02 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 94 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: - 90 . 00 ns :0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0670 PEAK RATE: 0 .38 cfs VOL: 0 . 15 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min Joy s Bc . D E-LOP p.r-\IQ,pt-c.. a I - Pam : 1'0 ,1 5t-1-er area_ I .76 Prr_.-e. - 30.)Me, 3..5 - r- PreAty el c-oQ r & ccJc.S) 2 . Ci E Num3 ..�.. II •Iofs = Z.0. r? lof s1 , 7$ � b� Pe-r- 1G,n CZ . , r�.,ble. 3,S,z 5 L ',� ? un`fs -7 5;% ro,,s locos , S3 - © ct4- Prc a Pr2)(Q1 ota 5 , ,7G - 0,94 _ a-5:Q)4---"Ae) Jo 3 . sr\ OF CO c pI-Tiow 0_ -t-{-1 p, s'f-dx,, CL ,) : go' ske- Pow o-cx ss W Q y- r r% . (,rza_:':..;o Lf I'` 10; cx.crtD. r Ion n , Ps-v-e S1010.e, = 3 ( Z - 3ocp _ .7 0/0 90 I G 7. O Z fy)\h u fe-S 6.-ee, crrnn rust-r- Cal L SI G-ic.'J a- . 1 sO R_.uv I k+-S b Pio Z- ( In, G P,oi 3.9 iv) . a . .. £ 2 O. c_ =S b & ,(3 = 0 ,(Q o c)=s G sCL coo .: 0 ,ct1• C.)-- File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; eeeeeeeeee; O 0 SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET 0 0 O 0 0 0 °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 . 1500 •0 0 °ARE°Flow Length (ft) 90 . 00 °HOICES ° °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 ° ° °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0670 0 0 °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 7 . 02 ° ° °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A 0 °ABS° 0 0 °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 0 0 °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y ° o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 . 2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 0 0 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 . 2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 0 0 °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 0 0 °CN °Dense grasses • 0 •24 0 0 o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 0 0 o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 0 0 °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 0 °TOT° 0 0 °°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete 0 o Pgdeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefit 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee V _NI EL_DPED File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool - J2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; . ° 0 °Rectangular vault ° °Trapezoidal basin ° °Underground pipe ° °Sto list ° 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° o RECTANGULAR VAULT ° ° o STORAGE STRUCTURE ID: 1 ° ° °eeeeef °Name. : DETENTION VAULT ° °Length (ft) • 50 . 00 ° °Width (ft) • 26 . 00 ° 2 )o t v °Starting Elevation. : 296 .50 I °Max Elev of Vault . . : 303 .50 ° vCL•0l+- 8112-51cr °Stage-Sto Increment : 0 .10 ° °Structure Vol (cf) . : 9100 . 00 ° (A)° Ac-ft . : 0 .21. ° Act* SO 0 °PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit ° v Ol V Kam- kYC-A"e'0.S aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Available Memory remaining: 204040 bytes Current Data Set Name: \jacques .bsn File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; o MULTIPLE ORIFICE ° o DISCHARGE STRUCTURE ID: 1 ° o 0 °Name: FLOW RESTRICTOR 0 °Peak Dsgn Release Rate: 0 . 07 cfs Orif /flow/elev 0 °Orifice Coefficient. . . : 0 . 62 Dia (in) /cfs/ ft 0 °Lowest Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 80 ° °hl : Outlet to 2nd Orifice : 4 . 00 300 .50 ft 0 °Second Orifice Dia (in) . . : 1. 00 °. . °h2 : 2nd to 3rd Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 .<<.,- 0 °Third Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 ° °h3 : 3rd to 4th Orifice. . . : 0 .-00 �� ° °Fourth Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 f ° °h4 : 4th to 5th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 R2.��Y1 c.��� ° °Top Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 ° O 0 °Elevation of Lowest Orifice • 294 .50 0 °Outlet Elevation • 296 .50 0 °Max Elev Above Outlet • 303 .50 0 °Stage-Disch Increment 0 . 10 0 O 0 Av°PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit 0 Cuaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Jaeger Engineering JACQUES PLAT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS LEVEL POOL ANALYSIS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE < DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (Cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2 YEAR 0 . 03 0 .38 1 1 300 . 11 11 4696 .34 10 YEAR 0 . 07 0 . 60 1 1 301 . 98 12 7128 .40 ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD 2 YEAR 0 . 03 0 .38 1 1 300 . 11 0 . 03 11 10 YEAR 0 . 07 0 . 60 1 1 301 . 98 0 . 07 12 Lev.e.1 Poo l I S( Vow ft. w t� Clo Lcfc 30% Ivy VolvN\2 Vault- s ize So' 2&-) 'File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool • J2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; • ° 0 °Rectangular vault ° °Trapezoidal basin ° °Underground pipe ° °Sto list 0 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° o RECTANGULAR VAULT ° ° o STORAGE STRUCTURE ID: 2 ° ° °eeeee f °Name. : DETENTION VAULT WI - 30o ADD ° °Length (ft) 65 . 00 ° °Width (ft) • 26 . 00 ° L °Starting Elevation. : 296 .50 VO- lI W filtrl °Max Elev of Vault. . : 302 .50 ° °Stage-Sto Increment: 0 . 10 — 13o% vc (Ur— °Structure Vol (cf) . : 10140 . 00 ° o Ac-ft. : 0 .23 ° -cj(r— o ° °PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 50 x I . 3 = (QS Available Memory remaining: 204040 bytes co r (00 -1r• Current Data Set Name: \JACQUES .bsn File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; o MULTIPLE ORIFICE ° o DISCHARGE STRUCTURE IDq. :1 ° o 0 °Name: FLOW RESTRICTOR ° °Peak Dsgn Release Rate: 0 . 07 cfs Orif /flow/elev . ° °Orifice Coefficient. . . : 0 . 62 Dia (in) /cfs/ ft 0 °Lowest Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 82 0 °hl : Outlet to 2nd Orifice: , 4 . 00 300 .50 ft 0 °Second Orifice Dia (in) . . : 1. 00 0 °h2 : 2nd to 3rd Orifice. . . : 1. 60 302 . 10 ft • 0 °Third Orifice Dia (in) . . : 12 . 00 0 °h3 : 3rd to 4th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 0 °Fourth Orifice Dia (in) .: :. 0 . 00 � ` � °h4 : 4th to 5th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 1----11 t�J °Top Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 ° °Elevation of Lowest Orifice • 294 .50°Outlet Elevation • 296 .50 ,-.. I'w ° °Max Elev Above Outlet • 302 .50' ° °Stage-Disch Increment 0 . 10 I� 'I r' ° o ° Av°PGUP PGDN F3 :. Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit 0 Cuaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 9/15/00 Jaeger Engineering page 1 JACQUES PLAT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS LEVEL POOL ANALYSIS INCLUDING 100 YEAR WITH 130% VAULT LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE < DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2 YEAR 0 . 03 0 .38 1 1 300 . 05 11 4609 .99 10 YEAR 0 . 07 0 . 60 1 1 301 .92 12 7044 . 10 100 YEAR W/30%VAULT 0 . 19 0 . 91 2 1 302 . 11 13 9479 .53 ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD 2 YEAR 0 .03 0 .38 1 1 300 . 05 0 . 03 - 11 10 YEAR 0 . 07 0 . 60 1 1 301 . 92 0 . 07 12 100 YEAR W/30%VAULT 0 . 19 0 . 91 2 1 302 . 11 0 . 19 13 Lej- \ P 1� Gtvc i� 100 )0 U siIAa_ � y Jaeger Engineering JACQUES PLAT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WATER QUALITY HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY P2 _ Z,O _ Dap-7 BASIN. SUMMARY 3 3 BASIN ID: C2 NAME: WATER QUALITY STORM, . SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 78 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • YPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 0 . 67 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 68 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 7 .02 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .94 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 90 . 00 ns: 0 2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0670 PEAK RATE: 0 . 10 cfs VOL: 0 . 04 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min W V PCU L CPsL C O -71 O ����v� � LA)cae�r �.vo.-� t� b 3 o, o 31'- ?cam , 11.029 Fr = U JJe.' 1t s Lt' volt.)rr V/ o\u 11\L Pro�A.c49.e 4 toy' 2�' I ' ) o9p FT3 plz �P 3. I ' ' %Ifl t rn U,M Sv r-cc_e: , etrzP. re-c4._ 'red % DC 'A.bu' l- t m f•er`v► oils CLr CPems- ‘AG CD • rN0.4,1--'0-1) • a) vmperv. o °-- O , 94 Pic- 40 9 1;) car rde.zpi,u krej 440 , 0 4_09 Gurea, P'rou` 5-(2,(0) I L qo 1/45-F . . • APPENDIX A CHARTS, TABLES, GRAPHS FROM KING COUNTY SW)! MANUAL • • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC. SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* • Aiderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Aiderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Sala! C Everett Sammamish D Indianola Seattle 0 Kitsap C Shacar 0 Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Nellton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila 0 Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS -. • A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep.well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Solis having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures.. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Solis having very slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly Impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. • • From SCS, TR-55. Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCSI Soli Interpretation Record, Form *5, September 1988. • 3.5.2-2 1/9 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.S2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) - Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type IA rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDeOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION //A) B C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: (5 78 85 89 \t. Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries. landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% 80 t' or more of the area 6) 86 90 p.24 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots = 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 9 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds. etc. 00 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA . 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and • industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. • 3.5.2-3 I/90 KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 0 • f FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS t------ • - _ *Ail ' `'-"- a--. .a. :1---- --. — �. -- -- -- 1/1 iilkc 4111. . ilk * '641/K. ira w e Ill .�� .411014.. V100 • , ,,,,.,,,N....,.. , ...IA ,.. MI etit 29 __-_ iliipt ' onboi 1 VAT' c •'.41Ph . ___..V,4*_114orJi, riil • No ,t \ • .„:c214.1 _A6.• Ni- RE,441M--PaltrW IMP ' 41/4/A . , - 4.. \\i"(..Iii1;7t •-:-.T'gur.iipwimill A. --- rilrigrW door / .4\rik - ilikl, L Ch.' lita, _,''',"', -ill' ---Aiffiel. ...-10MMINIIMImmlors, - dier.- 110.4r, -6.ic vigittaimi I, )) ...lirgr -..r-srpoir*-411" At sti ; fw-‘ .-.: ll/,.-"/ -.= Vki ii\- 4 7-ZA\. - =- _ Ai.: a - Ira�� �,��: � '�fi-,- � _ � o . " 7, L i 1 ui�i -a���.� r y►a l . % --/P1-,....:\ ( _ \ i ; a . gi **7-- . 11 Still \-Me \ ''' IT:r, Latior7in immmalri `:- `.* Iittio, 44-- tt's ./ ...... ii I .1 . AL___-...: - - vairallil 0 VA.VaTi ' ? ..., '‘. . .3/41pwei, a-Awl glipminvvil \ . „ ..,-. _ ,_ , , ..,. 1,11,4i,ii.ratier"tso„._iiiko ... . ., . f, --- Riteit i‘w6mlum 0,dp *\- J_- ., ilaitilk 411417141111t:4% " .1) i- / .\--- 4*.alamktat rivuouyokili :Alfitipr- - lit CV \-... '"'-' MIR 1 lliktkVill.ka il .‘' .. C V " VA*itd . glit- 9t i.jilight _-4 4\ .7 ..aril"- . ---N,,,,,,,r` Alf , , r _______. \ virs,,,, . 1.,15.4 t eV • ....,_.1. _ff.! .t. • • iiii , r i . 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION .. r ''ti• afil'�i, �I I -. 0.3.4_• ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR I ��,,w �� 35 " TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �r , VON" 0 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 I!Mlles _ e`r•v N r _ - 1:300.000 3.5.1-8 1/90 , ` KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. SURFACE W.ATER DESIGN MANUAL • FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 4 1-) 23 ! riiii,7-4,r,il-, ...._,akaoril," .. ./airOreAfreo a %INA 24 i Fi.m, adquilimit AN" 1 • 25 ./. - Alt.010 1E4 ifitrArrigt 2.6 ./ forgdiew -41. 91 FAut. . iiitik- 6- .,_.1._.....,1 2.7 , i '4111liailtrhP- II.,411,041 \ "-Illt , 29 \i AltiVeztit.iiIIIWAN 41 -..III .1 ,- �. �,';�;=ice `:� � I. �he � N( .2c � — vark,34 ,A. , \ ..._ ---,,,,awiguimmor-411*4, ',,,�. •1 15•63, ,,, ,,:\ . f It skitet- ,.., , `,9::;.. ., I ,11113 'n A , � ,r •am. �'. . Ai 3-2 ; fulq" - ri .. !Mk _ . tt/ • - 1 ,• ./ --tilkitt 1 ( . 1111k • k ., -,› .11„,.... 13 if--=. - -. --\. Ivor\ 4t. - ',7.xi#Pb "1 -,•1' -%,, /--,rii" - . ' ' 1 HI* -41 41011Egillk it • i ; S** ,..31.4U1_.__,,..,4'.74 k . . AI a ,. J 4 if • - --i,:.--- ''.AWfl. ;4 Stkagit S'...q...Z--•.._- .i I' 11111).1 ''\* . 41114611 /117 (-.‘;" :... N. Al I ' I./: al c vresini pr 4/1 Dm Mons,.WI Mir El blik Vra ... ._ 7 v'rtz I i /64.:Ii waidillasmfminT4'..-- tri_...keillOP ..... ( � f I �-,�� �1� kormiliwormAir - -LigAri \- - _1.- ,. . ' ' Willi in - . ,. -- .--- w.km:miiiiVitt cliiir Wiewqr '..,.) -, . .7,,i „ ,. .... . ,5,, .,......„,,,,,.., , ii, til leopr .. _ • De- tr-NRiligr- P40 -I" -- k • pi „lecw--:..., i , • \ Tr,-;1110 ••177-' . . • -, *ftY .. 4 .A . , , -1 pm. s!. , • •- .,„ • - . - vARFAZIMliiiik , lErinFritilli . ,...,....._ 10-YEAR.24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ,, ., w� rsr;,�, 40 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR • �'. �/� ri r ,- TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES' ,10 W �' _ 3 2 • - , , ..„., - __ -11w -7 �. r-- -- -ram-,--�- --- .��` ?` / — /. .. - .. --.ems .. I IGURE 3S1H 100-YEAR Z4-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS •_ 711 ,..7-1p","b7 - - -mg 1 . - ---4-: ------1 v---1---77 • it/ 3.1, 1 vtgetw:. upit.4dillim , ; *Mad/ 1 4-sow 3s i OW"1141 �j na�m 4� ihip 4. ,1‘;ftt _M L'7 • 3 % .diffCal,_ -501 40 .1 .04171VaWilli_Ws .11 /.., iiiiklii . 7 . 44.1i, - •72P.l: !-11r.li--,"-,-7-e411', ,. iaal1i' i_ Q.� � � ii.� i ` _ -- ©ic 'mil t111rWl ti 1 I i Er AllMill. '-4 j c 4.4 -1 '.', ...t?sig'131 ; - - "kieistiii ......n. ..A` % ro w _ , iee-eoig ,4ra.m.... .......1112 / .,. lit.,. .. pi% Ifiiritt#,*:;,410# 0 iii v tk IS 14 N ifiFiliiv_j I, atitifft 'AV'esgoopOL- *, . I ' t- ht,,,,„;:.,_ tut( ,0,„,,„,„ A. ° 11‘I‘11 --./ LtOokikVi 11 .i1K- .- ,v1._::- \ .,/.=, - *al , ii. , . , VIM(\._ _taviiiimii.:, . - :_ its ' � ,��� • i , .1,- la--7 . Srfi ( - '' '.0.. " ALA Lein" 4. z---\,,00,44% ,ikk.. II i 1 \ --. ' 1177 AtilMit*NAVA4 11%.*71- h / - . lb= • Ilri..911111 trig Niktimil -441 w Can 111§ flii Rpm t. , tight . ''' -i-ip le kr-oli-v.. ,1 j_ , riii r 1 I'� MIN ° l :( f ' / ...wimp ,. --- . --‘ ;,-. .__,_oFrao ,Ns.5rrzi1--- fga-:6a..ri-o90 R. A � amo.i•. e. v,A,oiAkierir- - ._. v .i.: '�r‘ �. * fit. r,ik--'ti14d 0iltt6 qi t,i, __ __40-14.iiii_r7biliri 4T . • , 14 r ._ ., . . s . vit;._ AI e. . \WT. - 11V -1 ' . -.'- --- Ar ----- --- `:‘frAPA al 5 rA 3C/ "EAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION i0/�1 ` ` - tQ N /�►ia�i►_� � 6D 3-J ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR p�. '���.�,����•� _ 5,5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES At)11- R °`� / a' o. 1:300.000 3.5.1-13 �,J : ;r 1/90 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE WEST HALF OF TRACT 223, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WA. GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEA TTLE DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 82, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. JACQUES •24TH STREET PLAT LUAoo-127 PP , ECF mil MO MP MP MP %IP lir 1411 4/ 4/ 4P iiiP -41 a a 4' 4 0 WI OP 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 10 ill 40 0 4! 4 4 4 4 ..1 . cf !1 • IN, ,.., . , 0 0 • , \ ! . , • ' . . , . . . "0 i - • •• I , ' • 1 1 . ;,i ; , ; { .'II ent%1 , • . , „ „ 8 i : ..: __. •, , 4 sopesi AVe ;NE ! ---' ' . . j ones Ave. NE . . , , ,• ,,, zw . . . : • • , _ . . 1 ! : . , ., „ , , ,, , , , • , . : • . _ , . • i , , . . . . . ; . , ci) _______,-... ...„ , , . -- , „ , , , 1 ___, _ , .. ____.•_ i : , i :.._ , , ; ; , , __,___ _____ 1 ! \ — ___; 1 t 11Ne-iR-tin1a L"Ti AveJ 14F ,-. ' 70' . i _...._11111 ' ,/ ! x• ..•____ 7-c°11 _. ... _.__ , .._._. _ , . , . , R8 ., ,, , --r-------- -__F-1----: -". R i 1 - --- 1 , I I_ 7 , *1-. --- --i• __. 1 i ---- 1 0,7cn Linctoln : , c::::• -- -' T----- \ \ i 1 !i p, --- c-÷ \ ; _._ nte,rey --1 ,-- -- ' --.--'F- - ---li-ote-rey- Alr-ef• ; / , , r , , .0 - ---.-- -- --- :,,, 4. , , KO ereb,. 1 , i• : -,2 --M----- t------ i_, , , . c_., ____......., , , . . ,._ , , • NE , „ „ , , , . • .. , ‘03 • _1. ..„.1.Axi. ,.__ :•,.. ,CC)T N' --'----,-.-4- --•-7- ._ trj 7.---• ' . -.----- ' -ii----4-- : , . _ __. . . - . Mdriter' ey___ Ct.; NE- --- . 7--, Aberdeen , . • ,x) _Ii___,• oi ba IE : • •_•_, . , , , ---r Ave. Nfl . : : . _. . . N . 1 : ; , i ! i , , , . . ,. • ', • ; i , . , • , , ... • . . . , ,. 1,.._,... . . . • 1...._ . , PI • kn ... ! "J , •---- • -. . - : _.___ (--1- _ - •--•--I • i ! : : . - , • , , --. ---.4 !,,,,,, ....__ _,_,..___. • =- . , . : - . , . . . , ... • , , , / . _ . „. -,... ______ I ---Eir...-1';: 11 . , T __ . ..: • . . _ , . , _,.____ .!...., .. tri A3-7- T-1 ----1.-... - --- -.' -Blairtre7 AVO. , NE , 7---- --L I,, , , 1 , r=1 - , ,_ , .. _ —i rii - . ; ; , . ' - 1 , 1 , r•--co ________, , . ---1 ZI [-co-- , - " _._ ...i____ _, 1 -col i, .1iT aci) i i 1 ! i u tic1,41 --1f•-s- LI_____I ..P.. . 7.) _________• ..., , __ __J___ __,2_,I_____L,A___1_,___i__ _ ,_. . _i_l__ ___, ____,L_ , H _ 1 1-+-r•-•-.. - t4 L . : 1 i . : la , __• 1 -n:i 1 1 / 1 nla8 -r-r 1 1 1 - _ _z,,c , , , 4, .._,!:--- i 1 t, i ,a ., . -•:)\\ ' L1_1:1- ir up• i -- c-i- .._., .:NL‘ F-Daytun- , . 1D,aylp 1-- ..„--' r i 1 : - ra AvO ,1‘161__V),- p. ,-1- -)---_it----- .-( . , _ / 'Av61 I ] - . [ 1 i •,j r____ 1 —I ',____LINI : __ R-8(P) 0 R10 . i ___,_____Li .1_4_1 _....-..„2 r---1 1-- 1- --I I . I i '7-----i-I 1 I 1— CO-- e• CD I i , ! I i i ; i i i , i 1 E dm o n cts--Av e. N 1 a)1 , I , , I , 1 , i , 1 I , I 'LI i I I 73 IN (.\\ cn 1 1 F tit , pi I , yo . , .• , i -"r, Oa 1---t-ri cr....1,..:1 ,-- --1,1---a,tr --- Z/I At asli NEU, .17 - Sa Joan Thompson -Party-of"Record LUA00-127 ._ ..._'`___ __. _ _._ _... _ . __ _ --Page 3n From: Elizabeth Higgins To: Thompson, Joan Date: 3/12/01 9:22AM Subject: Party of Record LUA00-127 Please add as a Party of Record for the above project: Ernie Bozeman 2232 NE 24th St Renton WA 98056 ;; •Go CIT1 DF RENTON .at Board of Public Works Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor OE'vki May 5,2004 q>ENT HEjy7.O N/NG Attn: Al McEvoy MAY u Eagle Electric LLC RRC 6 200y PO Box 2304 IVpo Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: OFF-SITE DEFERRAL JACQUES NE 24TH PLAT,LUA 00-127 2234 NE 24TH STREET RENTON,WA Dear Mr.McEvoy: The Board of Public Works met on May 5,2004 to review your application for a deferral for the installation of(3)three electric streetlight fixtures(doors and lamps)for(6)six weeks to complete recording of the plat. A decision was made to grant the deferral, subject to the following conditions: 1. A security device,acceptable to the Board,be in place at 150%of the cost of the improvement($652.50)to cover the deferred item. 2. No occupancy for the houses be granted until streetlight fixtures are installed and operational. Please find the enclosed security device,complete and return to the City of Renton in the provided envelope. As per Ordinance 4521, Section 4-34-14,you have fifteen(15)days from today's date to appeal the Board's decision. Appeals are to be filed in writing,with the City Clerk and require a filing fee of$75.00. You may call Juliana Fries,Board Coordinator,at(425)430-7278 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Crystal McMeans Recording Secretary 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON �� AHEAD OF THE CURVE :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer May 5,2004 Page 2 Enclosure cc: James Jacques,Property Owner Neil Watts,Chairman Juliana Fries,Coordinator Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Arnie Henninger,Plan Review Board Members LUA 00-127 File CITE -�F RFNTON al Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Jesse Tanner,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator August 26,2003 Joseph L.Rockne The Lawless Partnership - 6018 Seaview Avenue NW Seattle,WA 98107-2657 Re: Removal of Trees at NE 24th Street in Renton,Washington Dear Mr.Rockne It has recently come to my attention that your clients,Mr. and Mrs.Dennis Mitchell,have made certain claims pertaining to the removal of a tree associated with the development of property adjacent to their property'on NE 24th Street in Renton. As the planner who reviewed the Land Use Master Application for the proposed short plat on the adjacent property,I am able to provide you with a documented account of the events that transpired prior to the removal of the tree in question(Acer macrophyllum'Big Leaf Maple'). Mrs.Mitchell contacted me by letter(received October 25,2000)expressing concern regarding several issues including"a large maple tree that is on the corner just off the property line." On October 27,2000,I responded to Mrs.Mitchell's letter in which I clearly stated that trees would be removed for underground utilities. Mr. and Mrs.Mitchell were made Parties of Record for the land use action and received subsequent notification regarding the City of Renton's review and appeal processes. In particular,on November 9,2000,they were sent a notification of the Environmental Review Committee threshold determination in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(see attached). No subsequent correspondence was received from them,they did not exercise their legal right to appeal the ERC decision. • On November 29,2000,the City of Renton informed the Parties of Record(see attached)of the public hearing. On December 27,2000,the City sent a copy of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner to the Parties of Record(see attached). If Mr. and Mrs.Mitchell attended the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on January 2,2001 (there is no record that they did),they did not testify to express concerns about the proposed project. Following notification of the Hearing Examiner's decision,again they did not appeal the decision as they had a right to do. The next contact I had with Mr.and Mrs.Mitchell was by telephone prior to the removal of the tree in question. Mr.Robert Arthur provided his cellular telephone for this conversation,in which I reminded Mr. and Mrs.Mitchell of my early correspondence with them regarding the issue of the necessity of tree removal for utility construction. Regarding RCW 64.12.030,the regulation relates to removal of trees"without lawful authority." The decisions of the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee and Hearing Examiner were both made predicated on staff reports that stated trees would be removed for the purposes of utility construction. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 P. E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains50%recycledmaterial,30%postconsumer • Joseph L. Rockne Seattle,WA 98107-2657 August 26, 2003 Page 2 Specifically, "An estimated 3 trees over 6"in diameter at chest height will be removed prior to construction for roads and utilities. Due to grading for home sites,vegetation,including additional trees,will be removed."(Environmental Review Committee Staff Report and Decision,November 7,2000,page 9). As you are aware,the City of Renton is the lawful authority for decisions relating to public health,welfare,and safety. Construction of public utilities is included in that decision-making authority. - Regardless of the above,removal of established trees is a serious matter that staff considers during proposed project review. As a licensed lapdscape architect,I am particularly aware of the importance of mature trees in the landscape..,Upon review:•of Mr.MacCoy's tree appraisal, however,there are several points:you:should consider in this Matter. x.. The determination of the valtie,of astree.is based on a percentage factor with a"100 percent"tree - being the perfect tree in its;location.,These factors vary from region to region. Mr.MacCoy has rated the tree in question as a°65,.percent treey,((#1 Bi .,Leaf Maple=•5.Species rating.65 in his report). In actuality,Mr.`;Joseph Witt o .the'$? a gto Park Arboretum in Seattle has rated Big Leaf Maple trees in this region at"20peepemf„ FItaet,a:,zero percent ttee is one you would never plant. It could be argued that the :ee ti'ifestioiiNwould note ve Been planted in that location along NE 24th Street,as it•is n,Qt;,a,deirable': treet tree.;This canbe verified from the City of Seattle Ordinance#90047,which specifically prohibits planting Ace"macrophyllum(Big Leaf Maple),the roots of which.cause injury to sewers or pavemei4ts,,w , I hope you find these points useful and.if you have any questions,regarding them I would be available to discuss them with you.. You may.contact;me at-425-430-6576,Monday through Friday at 7:30 am to 4:30 pm. Sincerely • Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner Landscape Architect Cc: Mr.and Mrs.Dennis Mitchell Bruce MacCoy,Consulting Arborist James Jacques File c CIT`._� �. `F RENT®N ,;LL ., =.$ :Planning/Building/Public Works Department . ti Jesse •Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 9,2000 Mr.Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Love Lane .- - . - . • •• Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 • : SUBJECT: Jacques 24th Street Plat . • Project No. LUA700-127,PP,ECF • Dear Mr. Hanson: - . • • This letter is written on'behalf of the Environmental-Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that . they have:completed their review of the subject project. "The_ERC, on November 7, 2000, issued a • threshold Determination of Non=Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. . See the endosed - Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in Writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27, • 2000. Appeals must bel filed'in writing together with.the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of.Renton; 1055 South Grady Way, Rentot,:WA:98055. `:Appeals to the Examiner.are - . governed by City of Renton.Municipal_Code Section•4-8:11.0;Additional information regarding the appeal • process may be obtained from the Renton-City Clerk's:Offce (425)}430-6510.- • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing';Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council - Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,•Renton, Washington, on December .. 12,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat.• The-applicant•or representatives)of.the . • applicant is.required to be present at the public hearing:-.A copy.of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed;the appeal will be heard as . part of this public hearing. . . '. • The preceding information will assist you in.planning for,implernentation of your project and enable you to • • exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above,please call me at(425)430-7382: • . • . • For the•Environmental Review Committee, - 06. "•4 " . : • , ..• • , • • . Elizabeth Higgins,AICP . • Senior Planner . : . Cc: . Mr.J.Jacques/Owner • _ • , - - :• - Mr.&Mrs. Dennis Mitchell,Ms.Mary Wolfe/Parties of Record " . Enclosure :. - . dnsmttr . . - - . 1055.Smith Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • . at Th; ..omar......tmi..e cna_rarrydArl melon=t 9n G nost(magi Imo, • • 4 + _ . - CIT. _oF-•RENT'ON - ..-- -• :..IL • • . : : • L - .PlanningBuilding/Public Works Department - • • • . •• - Gregg Zimmerman P.E. Administrator . - Jesse Tanner,Mayor. - ... . . November 29,2000 - : • • ' Mr.Jim Hanson . • ' • • . - . 17446 Mallard Love Lane . . . . Mt.Vernon,WA 98274'. • • xcir_a_: SUBJECT: -Jacques 24"'Street Plat;-`' ` .� Project No. LUA-00-127,PP,,ECF• 'j•• - Dear Mr. Hanson: • � - t • • 'This letter is'to°inform you that-the'appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's - - . - • (ERG)Determination of Non-Significance.-;Mitigaed:for:the above-referenced project. - . No appeals were filed on:the.ERC detemiination.`_T: he:-applicant must comply with.all. ERC Mitigation • Measures. . - . - •- - A Public Hearing will be held by the:Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh - . : floor.of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,"Renton, Washington, on January.02, 2001 at 9:00 AM to -. consider the proposed Preliminary Plat:;:The applicant or-representative(s)of the applicant is required to. - - be present at the public.hearing A copy of the:staff:report"•will be.mailed to you one week before the . • hearing. R If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me1at(425)430-7382. .. • - - .- :For the:Environmental Review Committee, - - - "' • T • • •• • • • • • • • ' • : • Elizabeth Higgins,AICP._-• - - - - -• - : : • • Senior Planner cc: Mr.J.Jacques/Owner , .' •:: .:. . .. - • Mr.&Mrs. Dennis Mitchell Ms.•Mary Wolfe/Parties of Record -•. - . • " • . - eict - • - - - : - • 1055:South Grady-Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - • ' a)This Paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer ............. ..fa«,11�..:.[''I:�R`1:���-Ll1�iG%�:Y,.-.�...a.QJY:..:-:•:>::::�:.::.�::.:::........�::•.:�::.:�::,........:.:::::.::::::,::.;..:�:-::--::::..:.. ggosmamuommgggonmaggsmmnssmssnagggaosngsmtggsgmosmsbmgmgm ............... On the A�day of �(1 • , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing tiearin1 Rerov# documents.. This information was sent to: Name Representing 3eS t- �'1 q-�pii . viet 1 Q� s pro X 611.)i er • NV. N\A A-6,11.A,1 PAY-1-11 19-C Re,d4rcl (v . N1u,v t,(,,l ce- ep e -F i?eco►zL IX\V.you Cyr tt e c ' MY % \4MA bei,A S I I (Signature of Sender) 44404C.-, @,/nQA4z*)f STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that.I.know or have satisfactory evidence that kalle,r1 ( ( signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act o the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: '. lb Od ) `!r� 1YL ? p4 d 4tste of Wash on MMILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC " Notary(Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFFUlt4ii "PH-ES:STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmentAEN . COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29.2003 Proj a'__ tie S 'C'T4- S4retT Project Number. LU.f—o0-1-xn, PP) NOTARY2.DOC jib The Lawless 'j Partnership, T T n6JJl/r Attorneys at Law Seattle,WA 98107-2657 Gregory J.Lawless (206)782-9569 fax glawless@lawless2.com Janine A.Lawless (206)782-9535 jlawless@lawless2.com Kristin L.Lillquist klillquist@lawless2.com Joseph L.Rockne jrockne@lawless2.com August 20,2003 J&J Construction James Jacques 1216 North 38th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: Diane and Dennis Mitchell Dear Mr. Jacques: As you know,Mr. and Mrs.Mitchell have retained this firm to represent them with respect to the claims they may have against you as a result of the development activities taking place on the parcel adjacent to their home in Renton. Enclosed with this letter is a draft complaint which I have recommended to the Mitchells be filed. As you can see from the complaint, it is seeking monetary relief for the damages they have sustained as a result of your activities. With particularity,the Mitchells are very upset with the removal and damages of the trees in front of and boarding their home. Despite my recommendation that the matter be filed,they have requested that I make an effort to resolve this matter short of litigation.To that end,they have authorized me to negotiate a resolution of the matter. In exchange of a release of any claims they may have as a result of your activities involving the damage and removal of the trees and the damage to the sewer line,the Mitchells would be willing to accept the sum of$56,400 provided that you also enter into a written agreement with them that you will make all practical efforts to avoid blocking access to their home during the remaining period of time you are developing the property. I am sure that you are rather surprised by the high dollar figure of this proposed settlement. However, Washington law has afforded landowners broad authority to protect trees,timber and shrubs surrounding their property. RCW 64.12.030 was originally enacted by the Washington State Legislature in 1881 and specifically allows a person to bring an action against anyone who "shall cut down, girdle or otherwise injure, or carry off any tree, timber or shrub . . . on the street or highway in front of any person's house . . . ." I have attached a copy of that statute to this letter and highlighted the relevant portion. Apparently recognizing the unique nature and importance that trees can play to landowners,the statute also provides that,should the judgment be given to the plaintiff,it shall be trebled. Trebling the damages claimed in this matter could result in a judgment against you in excess of$100,000. Also recognizing the legislature's high value which has been placed on matters of this nature, a Washington Supreme Court has recently upheld an award of emotional distress damages in a case involving the damage and removal of trees. Birchler v. Castello, 942 P.2d 968 (1997). 06/17/1999 ' 18:53 4254500033 CONSULTING ARBORIST PAGE 01 Bruce Mac Coy Consulting Arborist 1611 105th Avenue,S.E. Bellevue , Washington , 98004 ' 425-450-1584 or 800-348-6238 Fax : 425-450-0033 18 June , 2003 Mrs. Dennis Mitchell , This report is being sent to you via fax at 206-364-2193 and by mail. Recently I visited your home to look at your trees. I've drawn a diagram of what we looked at : 1111. N Zsm Tr. The numbers in the circles represent a tree that was removed ( # 1 ) and two ( #'s 2 and 3, ) that have been damaged. All are Big Leaf Maples. The stump has been ground out on # 1. In order to be compensated for your loss , the first step is to determine the values of each tree. The correct way to do that is by using a process called the Trunk Formula • Method ( TFM ). The TFM is described in the Guide for Plant Appraisal , 9th edition , published by the International Society of Arboriculture. Ply worksheets are attached. The appraised value of tree # I. is $30,000. Since trees # 2 and 3 are only 10 damaged , the appraised value of the damage is $1,740 for 2 ( $17,400 appraised value x 10 % $1,740 ) and $2,760 for # 3 ( $27,600 x 10 4 = $2,760 ) . The total value of the damage done to $ ,7 g your property , then , is w30,OQ0 t i 40 t $2,760 = $34.500. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely t f rr P-C. crhir Bruce Mac Coy E-Mail:ConsaltingArborigt@MSN.COM 06/17/1999 18:53 4254500033 CONSULTING ARBORIST PAGE 02 BRUCE MAC COY CONSULTING ARBORIST 1611 105th Avenue , S.E. Bellevue , Washington , 98004 Phone : 425-450-1584 Fax : 425-450-0033 TRUNK FORMULA METHOD Case : 23-499 . Property : Mr. Dennis Mitchell . Date : 30 May , 2003 Appraiser : Mac Coy FIELD OBSERVATIONS • 1. Species : Bigleaf Maple ( Twin )(* 1 2. Condition : .75. 3. Trunk Diameter : 56.inches 4. Location = (Site .75, + Contribution .60. + Placement .55. ) divided by 3 = .63 Regional Plant Appraisal Committee &,'or Appraiser-Developed or -Modified Info. 5. Species rating .65. 6. Replacement Tree Size (Diameter) 2.5. Inches (Trunk Area.) 5 Square Inches (TAr) 7. Replacement Tree Cost $145.00. 8. Installation Cost $.:35.00. (See Regional Information 9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + #8) $280.00 To Use Cost Selected for #'s 7 and 10) 10. Unit Tree Cost (#9 / TAr) $ 56 Per Square inch Calculations By Appraiser Using Field And Regional Information 11. Appraised Trunk Area : (TAa or ATAa : Use Tables 4.4 - 4.7) = 1743 .square inches Or C Squared (#3) ' x 0.08 Or D Squared (#3) x 0. 785 . 12• Appraised Tree Trunk Increase (TAinci ) TAa or ATAa 1743 .Square inches (#11) - TAr 5- Square inches (#6) 13. Basic Tree Cost = TAincr = 1738 Square inches (#12) 1738 square inches x Unit Tree Cost (#10) $ . 56 Per Square inch + Installed Tree Cost (#9) $280.00 = $ 97608 14. Appraised Value = Basic Tree Cost (#13) $ 97608 x Species Rating (#5) .65. x Condition (#2) _75. x Location (#4) .63 = $29977.86 15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more , round it to the nearest $100 ; If it is less , round to the nearest $10. 16. Appraised Value (#14) l - _ $ 3�OGo �" Signature Items 5 through 10 are determined by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. The wholesale Replacement Tree Cost , the Retail Replacement Tree Cost , or the Installed Tree Cost (*9) divided by the Replacement Tree Size (#6) can be used for the Unit Tree Cost (#10) , or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. e-mail : ConsultingA,rborist@MSN.Com • 06/17/1999 18:53 4254500033 CONSULTING ARBORIST PAGE 03 BRUCE MAC COY CONSULTING ARBORIST 1611 105th Avenue , S.E. Bellevue , Washington , 98004 Phone : 425-450-1584 Fax : 425-450-0033 TRUNK FORMULA METHOD Case : 23-499 . Property : Mr. Dennis Mitchell . Date : 30 May , 2003 Appraiser : Mac Coy FIELD OBSERVATIONS 1. Species ; Bigleaf Maple(** 2.) • 2. Condition : .79. 3. Trunk Diameter : 30.5.inches 4. Location = (Site .85. + Contribution .80. + Placement .85. ) divided by 3 = .83 Regional Plant Appraisal Committee &/or Appraiser-Developed or -Modified Info. 5. Species rating .65. 6. Replacement Tree Size (Diameter) 2.5. Inches (Trunk Area) 5 Square Inches (TAr) 7. Replacement Tree Cost $145.00. 8. Installation Cost $135.00. (See Regional Information To Use Cost Selected for 9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + #8) $280.00 #'s 7 and 10) 10. Unit Tree Cost (#9 / TAr). $ 56 Per Square inch Calculations By Appraiser Using Field And Regional Information 11. Appraised Trunk Area : (TAa or ATAa : Use Tables 4.4 - 4.7) = 730 ,square inches Or C Squared (#3) x 0.08 _. . _ Or D Squared (#3) x 0.785 12. Appraised Tree Trunk Increase (TAincr) = TAa or ATAa 730 .Square inches (#11) - TAr 5 Square inches (#6) 13. Basic Tree Cost = TAincr (#12) 725 S 725 Square inches (Ain quare inches x Unit Tree Cost (#1) )$280.056 Per Square inch + Installed Tree Cost $ 40880 14. Appraised Value = Basic Tree Cost (#13) $ 40880 x Species Rating (#5) .65. x Condition. (#2) .79. x Location (#4.) .83 = $17423.26 15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more , round it to the nearest $100 ; If it is less , round to the nearest $10. 16. Appraised Value (#14) _ $ 1/i ,(OO Signature ISO Items 5 through 10 are determined by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. The Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost , the Retail Replacement Tree Cost , or the Installed Tree Cost (#9) divided by the Replacement Tree Size (#6) can be used for the Unit Tree Cost (#10) , or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. e-mail : ConsultingArborist@MSN.Com 06/17/1999 18:53 425458©033 CONSULTING ARBORTGT PAGE 04 -BRUCE MAC COY CONSULTING ARBORIST 1611 105th Avenue ., S.E. Bellevue , Washington , 98004 Phone : 425-450-1584 Fax : 425-450-0033 TRUNK FORMULA METHOD Case : 23-499 . Property : Mr. Dennis Mitchell . Date : 30 May , 2003 Appraiser : Mac Coy • FIELD OBSERVATIONS 1. Species : Sigleaf Maple(t*3) 2. Condition : .70. 3. Trunk Diameter : 41.75,inches 4. Location = (Site .85. + Contribution .80. + Placement .85. ) divided by 3 = .83 Regional Plant Appraisal Committee &/or Appraiser-Developed or -Modified Info. 5. Species rating .65. 6. Replacement Tree Size (Diameter) 2.5. Inches (Trunk Area) 5 Square Inches (TAr) 7. Replacement Tree Cost $145.00. 8. Installation Cost $135.00. (See Regional Information To Use Cost Selected for 9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + #8) $280.00 #'s 7 and 10) 10. Unit Tree Cost (#9 / TAr) $ 56 Per Square inch Calculations By Appraiser Using Field And Regional Information 11. Appraised Trunk Area (TAa or ATAa : Use Tables 4.4 - 4.7) = 1304 .square inches Or C Squared (#3) x 0.08 Or D Squared (#3) x 0.785 12. Appraised Tree Trunk Increase (TAincr) = TAa or ATAa 1304 .Square inches (#11) - TAr 5 Square inches (#6) = 1299 Square inches 13_ Basic Tree Cost = TAincr (#12) 1299 Square inches x Unit Tree Cost (#10) $ 56 -Per Square inch + Installed Tree Cost (#9) $280.00 = $ 73024 14. Appraised Value = Basic Tree Cost (#13) $ 73024 x Species Rating x ConditionP ( 5) .65. (#2) .70. x Location (#4) .83 = $27577.51 15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more , round it to the nearest $100 ; If it is less , round to .the nearest $10. 16. Appraised Value �� (#14) = $ �� (��^ Signature Items .5 through 10 are determined by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee, The Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost , the Retail Replacement Tree Cost , or the Installed Tree Cost (#9) divided by the Replacement Tree Size (#6) can be used for the Unit Tree Cost (##10) , or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. e-mail : ConsultingArborist@MSN.Coe August 20,2003 Page 2 I trust that you will be conferring with appropriate counsel seeking advice with respect to this letter and the proposed complaint. To that end I will not file the lawsuit until September 2 in order that you will be given an opportunity to review and respond. Sincerely, W -'VIA J eph . Rockne JLR/pw cc: Diane and Dennis Mitchell M:ULRILETIERS MITCHELL.J&J Page 1 of 1 RCW 64.12.030 Injury to or removing trees, etc. --Damages. Whenever any person shall cut down, girdle or otherwise injure, or carry off any tree,timber or shrub on the land of another person, or on the street or highway in front of any person's house, village, town or city lot, or cultivated grounds, or on the commons or public grounds of any village,town or city, or on the street or highway in front thereof, without lawful authority, in an action by such person, village, town or city against the person committing such trespasses or any of them, if judgment be given for the plaintiff, it shall be given for treble the amount of damages claimed or assessed therefor, as the case may be. [Code 1881 §602; 1877 p 125 §607; 1869 p 143 §556;RRS §939.] NOTES: Trespass,public lands: Chapter 79.40 RCW. http://search.mrsc.org/nxt/gateway.d11/rcw/rcw%20%2064%20%20title/rcw%20%2064%2(... 8/20/2003 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY DENNIS MITCHELL and DIANE NO. MITCHELL,husband and wife, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, vs. J &J CONSTRUCTION and JIM JACQUES CONSTRUCTION,LLC, a Washington limited liability company, and JIM JACQUES and JANE DOE JACQUES, and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants. .._. . _ COMES NOW the plaintiffs, by and through their attorney Joseph L. Rockne of The Lawless Partnership, LLP, and alleges as follows: I. JURISDICTION 1.1 The plaintiffs are a marital community residing in King County, Washington. 1.2 The defendants J&J Construction is a sole proprietorship doing business in King County, Washington. 1.3 Jim Jacques Construction,LLC,is a Washington limited liability company doing business in King County, Washington. COMPLAINT - 1 2.7 The defendants and/or the defendants' agents have caused the damage to a sewer stub which had run from the main sewer line to the plaintiffs'property line. As a result of the defendants'actions in damaging this sewer line,the plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. 2.8 The defendants and/or their agents undertook the actions with respect to the above- mentioned trees without the authorization or approval of the plaintiffs and without lawful authority, cut down and carried off the trees belonging to the plaintiffs. 2.9 The defendants'actions were intentional and not casual or involuntary. 2.10 The defendants did not have probable cause to believe that the land upon which the trees resided was their own. III. CAUSE OF ACTION 3.1 The defendants, by their actions, have violated RCW 64.12.030. 3.2 Because the defendants'actions were without lawful justification,the plaintiffs are entitled to treble damages, attorney fees and costs. IV. PRAY FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE,the plaintiffs pray for judgment as follows: A. For judgment against the defendants, jointly and severally in the amount of $34,500 for the damages to the above-referenced trees,together with prejudgment interest, costs, and reasonable attorney fees; B. That said amount be trebled pursuant to statute; COMPLAINT - 3 1.4 Jim Jacques and Jane Doe Jacques, as individuals and as a marital community composed thereof, reside in and do business in King County, Washington. II. FACTS 2.1 The plaintiffs own real estate in King County, Washington, commonly known as 2224 NE 24th Street, Renton, Washington, 98056. 2.2 Prior to the actions of the defendants described below, the plaintiffs had three mature trees either on their property, on the property boundary line and/or on the street in front of their home. 2.3 Attached to this complaint and marked Exhibit A is a report by Bruce McCoy, consulting arborist, concerning the above-referenced trees. 2.4 The tree marked in Exhibit A as tree No. 1,has been removed by the defendants and/or at the defendants' request. This tree was on the plaintiffs'property line and/or upon the street in front of the plaintiffs'home. 2.5 The trees marked in Exhibit A as Nos. 2 and 3 have been damaged as a result of the actions of the defendants and/or their agents. 2.6 As a result of the removal of tree No. 1 and the injuries to trees Nos. 2 and 3,the plaintiffs have been damaged in the following amounts: With respect to tree No. 1,the plaintiffs' damages, based on a trunk formula method as described in Exhibit A, in the amount of$30,000; with respect to tree No. 2,the amount of$1,740;and with respect to tree No. 3, in the amount of $2,760. COMPLAINT -2 C. For damages to the sewer line stub in an amount to be proven at the time of trial; and D. Such other and further relief as may be proper and equitable in this matter. DATED this day of August,2003. THE LAWLESS PARTNERSHIP, LLP Joseph L. Rockne, WSBA##21422 Attorney for Plaintiffs COMPLAINT - 4 •. CITY )F RFNTON to iiint-4 salL Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor August 11,2003 - Joseph L.Rockne The Lawless Partnership 6018 Seaview Avenue NW • I I Seattle,WA 98107-2657 Subject: Diane and Dennis Mitchell(letter dated 6iorz,.r.7 Dear Mr.Rockne: The City of Renton wishes to offer some clarification on the terms and conditions of the permit issued to '. construct the service facilities for the proposed plat immediately adjacent to your client's property. • Access to Driveways — This condition placed routinely on construction plans refers only to emergency access by fire, police or medical emergency personnel. Contractors are required to have on hand all materials to make sure emergency access is available to the houses and keep an emergency lane open. There is no provision requiring access to any site continuously during construction hours. The construction next to and in the frontage of the Mitchell property is within the permit and more importantly the right of way controlled by the city. With two exceptions,the contractor has complied with all city noise and restoration standards for a project under construction. One exception was',exceeding work hours due to a major water line tap. An inspector was on hand throughout to make sure the traffic control and access issues were safely addressed. The second is the final pavement restoration at the same location adjacent.to the Mitchell property. This is being handled as a code enforcement action. • • Access on August 15—The Mitchell family may or may not be aware that J&J Construction is under code enforcement to complete the paving and restoration of NE 24's Street, including the Mitchell driveway approach. As of this writing, the paving is to be completed on August 15, 2003. This was scheduled over two weeks ago, was the first opening in the paving company's schedule, and has already been delayed outside of compliance with city ordinance. The City of Renton has ordered this work to be done as soon as possible under threat of civil action and has accepted the schedule as presented. • Notice of Work-Please consider this notice to both you and your clients that work will proceed no later than Friday,August 15,2003. The work will consist of all pavement restoration activities including, but not limited to saw cutting, grinding, heavy equipment use and traffic associated with paving construction as required to comply with City of Renton codes and standards. Part of • the restoration includes the Mitchell driveway. This necessitates blocking the driveway again to place,form and construct the driveway approach as well as repair the asphalt removed during the course of installing the surface water facilities. Barring weather conditions,this work is scheduled to be completed the same day. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7299. Sincerely, Ka e Kittric Develo. ent Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections&Permits • CC: Larry Warren,City Attorney Neil Watts fQyea �jlta ieco3 • Robert Arthur 3 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE CP This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer The Lawless jLjPartn'ersliip, P 6018SeavwAvenueNW �"y�' 1� Attorneys at Law Seattle,WA 98107-2657 Gregory J.Lawless (206)782-9569 fax glawless@lawless2.corn Janine A.Lawless (206)782-9535 flawless@lawless2.com Kristin Lillquist Reede• kreeder@lawless2.corn Joseph L.Rockne jrockne@lawless2.com August 6,2003 • J&J Construction James Jacques • 1216 North 38th Street Renton,WA 98055 RE: Diane and DeEwh, Mitchell Dear Mr.Jacgties: • Diane and Dennis Mitchell have retained me to represent them with respect to various issues that have arisen as a result of the development you are currently engaging in adjacent to their property. After meeting with the Mitchells and reviewing the rather voluminous documentary evidence generated in this matter,they have requested that I provide you with formal written notification that they are requesting that you comply with the plan requirements regarding access to their home. As you are undoubtedly well aware,the development plans specifically state on their face that"existing driveways -- must be accessible at all times(or arrange with property owner)." • On more than one occasion;the activities in the front of their home have resulted in a complete blockage of their driveway and,because of the cutting away of the slope immediately adjacent to the road,completely prohibited access to their home on at least one occasion. The Mitchells have grown concerned that you plan on again blocking access to their driveway on approximately August 14 and/or 15. These dates are not acceptable to the Mitchells as they plan on delivering sod and other landscaping to repair damage whichhas occurred to their front lawn as a result of your activities on those dates. If you wish to arrange time to conduct your work,please contact this office and I will work with my clients in an effort to arrange a more suitable time. . Please be.advised that if you should fail to comply with the plan requirements and fail to obtain the prior approval of the:Mitchell to allow them 4Ccess to their driveway, they have instructed me to seek the appropriate court orders.and,in addition;they may also call the police. . I trust that you will comply with the plan permits and this letter and arrange a suitable time to impede the access of the Mitchells. Sincerely, #p'F.Rockne . JLR/pw. . . . • .. . cc:Diane and Dennis Mitchell • . M:WLR LEITERSU0E.L7R From: Kayren Kittrick To: dennis mitchell Date: 6/18/03 11:33AM Subject: Re:Jacques development Dear Ms. Mitchell: In looking at the plans submitted by the developer,only those trees that were felt to have a direct impact and might be removed were shown. It is obvious the surveyor missed the tree on the corner of the property. Also any tree retention schedule or requirements did not get transferred to the utility drawings as no trees were identified for preservation. Under notes for applicant code is cited which does not apply to the trees on your property that overhang NE 24th Street These notes generally refer to sections of existing city code that may apply to any project and are not to be considered additional conditions. Your trees are not under the protected categories of critical areas,steep slopes, landslide areas or streams. Most of the code requirements cover showing trees to be cut or replaced on the plans. Only one section specifically calls for showing trees to be retained and that is in critical area buffers. In reviewing the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing.Regulations (RMC Code 4-4-130)several things need to be noted as to what pertains, and does not,with this project Code 4-4-130 specifically exempts work on the right of way and typical utility installations. This protects city utility rights of service and access both public and emergency. So protection of the drip line is not an issue in NE 24th Street and may be exempt in the easement. As noted in the previous email, I have approved some modifications to lessen the impact on the tree at the mutual property corner including waiving separation.distances, moving the pipes as far to the east as possible and a design modification to the sidewalk to allow less impervious surface in the vicinity of the tree. Pruning of both branches and roots remains an option for the developer. The description of the code is quite specific in its intentions to save as many trees as practicable while allowing orderly development recognizing certain factors such as condition of the trees, proximity to existing and proposed structures and improvements and interference with utility services. Thus the strict measures for protection coupled with exemptions for utility and road construction. There are provisions even under the drip line protection clauses for the applicant to still be able to prune branches or roots as needed under the advice of a professional. But anything regarding tree damage or protections outside of the existing right of way is a private property issue. The modifications as granted to the developer meet the intent of the drip line protection code on private property and provide the utility services required for both the Jacques development and the plat to the east Thank you for the update on the PSE visit I am still concerned on the overhead clearance of your service line especially as it crosses NE 24th Street No notice is required for removing trees or pruning branches if done on the right of way or private property as part of an approved project. Entering another property for any purpose not identified by easement, infraction or emergency is not generally allowed. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Kayren IGttrick Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections&Permits :: CITY OF RENTON mu. Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department .. � GreggJesse Tanner,Mayor Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 29,2003 cw OF RENTOtr RECEIVED Jim Jacques Jim Jacques Construction LLC MAT U LU 03. 7 2509 Aberdeen Avenue NE Renton,WA 98056 BUILDING DIVISION' Subject: Modification to Accommodate Existing Tree Jacques NE 24th Street PP ,• . Dear Mr.Jacques: • After receiving a complaint of work in the vicinity of an existing tree, a site visit revealed a large maple tree at the southeast property corner of 2224 NE 241 Street. The drip line of the tree extends over the proposed easement for public sanitary sewer and the private storm drainage facilities. To provide gravity • service for two proposed plats the pipes must be installed at the lowest point of both the plats along the • western property line of the Jacques NE 24t° Street plat. No impervious surface is proposed for this location,as a new half cul-de-sac provides the paved access at the joint property line between this and the 'Parkview preliminary plat. The proposed easement is located in future back yards of single family lots. Review of RMC 4-4-130K Performance Standards for Land Development Permits provided several protection measures to be followed for any plant to.be retained. Protection of the tree drip line and existing shrubs where feasible is the intent of the protection measures.' The code clearly allows for _ _ modifications of construction restrictions due to on-site conditions or if the'intent of the regulations will be implemented by another means. The following modifications are approved due to the topography of the property and to meet the intent of the regulations:. • ❖ Waive the usual separation distance between sanitary and surface water facilities to a minimum of 3 ' feet. ' ' • • ❖ Move both pipe facilities as close to'the edge of the proposed easement as possible while still retaining ten feet of set back from the proposed building envelopes. • The City recommends you retain the services of an arborist to evaluate the condition of the tree prior to construction and after construction is complete. The cumulative effect should be disturbing the least amount of the drip line possible within the easement while bringing the proposed utilities back to original design at the critical junction point within the plat. Have your engineer record the line installation carefully for asbuilt purposes. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Ameta Henninger at 425-430-7298 or Dan Thompson at 206-999-1828. • Sincerely, • 4iittAr\ • Kayren K.Kittrick Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections&Permits • CC: Neil Watts Arneta Henninger Dan Thompson Robert Arthur 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E 1 V T O N •� AHEAD OF THE CURVE •." This papercontains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer April 9,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 109 • • ff.' * The City has secured a total of$3,610,000 in transportation grants so far this year,including a$63,000 Transportation Hazard Elimination Safety Grant for the Monster Rd./SW 68th Ave.project. * Upcoming groups performing at Carco Theater include"Mexico Vivo,"on Wednesday,April 11th at 7:00 p.m.; and"Kickshaw,"on Wednesday, April 18th at 7:00 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jim Coddington, 536 Wells Ave. S.,Renton, 98055, described the difficulties Citizen Comment: Coddington he has encountered with the City and Waste Management-Rainier in his effort —Garbage Collection to obtain an$80 credit on his garbage bill. He explained that the problem concerns garbage collection at a rental property he owns and reported that he recently discussed the matter with Councilman Parker,Utility Billing staff,and Derek Todd,Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer,in an effort to resolve the problem. Expressing his disappointment in the City's handling of the issue,Mr. Coddington announced his decision to sell his rental properties. Citizen Comment: Springer— John J. Springer, 19311 SE 243rd Pl.,Covington, 98042, stated that he actively Renton Youth Day Program works with youth at risk, and recommended that the City support and encourage activities that acknowledge the importance of our youth,for they are Renton's future. He encouraged the City to support not only Renton Youth Day,but to continue to support youth throughout the year. Citizen Comment: Giuliani— John R.Giuliani, 1400 S. 7th St.,Renton, 98055, commented on an article that Airport Advisory Committee appeared in the Renton Reporter concerning the City's Airport Advisory Membership Committee. He questioned whether all affected neighborhoods are represented on the Committee,particularly the Renton Hill neighborhood. • Mayor Tanner clarified that he has not yet appointed anyone to the Airport Advisory Committee. Councilmembers Clawson and Keolker-Wheeler • affirmed that all affected neighborhoods will have a designee on the Committee,including Renton Hill. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of April 2, Approval of Council minutes of April 2,2001. Council concur. 2001 Community Services: 2001 Community Services Department recommended approval of the annual Waterfowl Management interlocal agreement for waterfowl removal(continuation of egg addling Interlocal Agreement program and study),at a cost of$1,550. Council concur. Annexation: Lee,Hoquiam Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave NE&NE 9th St submitted 60%Notice of Intent to Annex for the proposed Lee Annexation; approximately 12 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave.NE(142nd Ave. SE) north of NE 9th St. (if extended)and west of 144th Ave. SE(if extended); and recommended a public hearing be set for 4/23/2001 to consider the petition. Council concur. Plat: Jacques 24th Street,NE Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Jacques 24th 24th St(PP-00-127) Street preliminary plat; 11 single-family lots on 1.78 acres located on NE 24th St.between Aberdeen Ave.NE and Edmonds Ave.NE(PP-00-127). Council concur. Legal: Legal Services Legal Division recommended approval of a contract with Warren,Barber& Contract,Warren,Barber& Fontes,P.S. for legal services. Refer to Finance Committee. Fontes,PS CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: II Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER " 9' 0/ Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Correspondence.. File No. LUA00-127,PP,ECF Ordinance Resolution • Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Other Request for Reconsideration and Response RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept Approval of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Jacques 24`'' Street Preliminary Plat was published on January 16, 2001. A request for reconsideration was received on January 30,2001 and the Examiner altered Condition 3 of the Recommendation as requested by the applicant. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the clarification of conditions outlined in the response, and the conditions outlined on page 6 of the Report and Recommendation. This office notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Jacques 24`h Street Preliminary Plat. I c '` • : �- - CITX:. 'F'RENTON . C la' '` - - Hearing Examiner . • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 5,2001 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard.Cove Lane • Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 RE: Request for Reconsideration for Jacques NE 24`h St.Plat,LUA00-127,PP,ECF Dear Mr.Hanson: • • This office has reviewed your request for reconsideration in this matter and the response follows. The concern raised was with the wording of Condition#3,which states: 3. The applicant shall achieve agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that • any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. • 'The concern you raised is that the City was not included and.that the applicant could be subject to a"veto" - by the easterly neighbor. " -.• - • This office is willing to alter the language and add the City,but wants assurance that the eastern neighbor is not left with a substantial grading effort when and if they develop their property. As it now stands,the reason the applicant was permitted to develop a"half-street"was the forecast that the other half will be . constructed,and constructed,in some reasonable timeframe. It would be unfair if the applicant creates a road and grade that reduces their costs,but creates an undue burden on the neighbor when that half of the road is developed because substantialygrade differences were created and substantial grading is required. In other words,the common road that will be ultimately_developed must be a reasonable compromise between . the current applicant and the eastern property owner. =-;-" . - Condition#3 shall be changed to read as follows: 3. The applicant,the City and the eastern neighbor shall achieve agreement to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable and that the parties compromise to equally sharethe burden required by the grade changes ' between the two parcels to create- road that serves the public use and interest. • If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write.- -. , Sincerely, • Fred J.Kaufman . .' • . - Hearing Examiner FJK:jt •cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner,. Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer . Larry Warren,City.Attorney . - • ' • Neil Watts;Development Services " Elizabeth Higgins,Development Services Parties of Record _ .• ,,1; it , 1901r-2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055.- (425) 430-6515 ,_., . yf-;f,--• , Hanson Consulting Jim Hanson (360)422-5056 1-29-01 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Wy Renton Wa. 98055 Subject: Request for reconsideration for LUA00-127,PP,ECF, Jacques NE 24th ST.Plat Dear Mr.Examiner: We are hereby requesting that you reconsider the wording of item#3 of your recommendation on the above referenced Plat. As stated in the hearing,the applicant is willing to work with the City and the eastern neighbor to achieve usable and safe grades for the new city street and any transition to the neighbors property. The wording in recommendation#3 leaves the City out of the review of the grades for the new street and at the same time gives the neighbor to the east veto power over the whole plat by just refusing to enter an"agreement"for the street grades and transition. We suggest wording similar to the wording used in item#4, as follows: The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate grades for the new street and to assure that any grade transition for the new street is safe and stable. Thank you for your reconsideration of item#3 of your recommendation. We will look forward to receiving your revised condition. Sin erely,...in #,Av i v4- p @ N O W N ni D im Hanson JAN 3 0 2001 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • January 16,2001 OFFICE.OF,THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon, WA 98274 File No.: LUA00-127,PP,ECF LOCATION: NE 24th Street,between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds • Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 77,505 sf(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on December 27,2000. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 2, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January.2,2001,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Cover sheet Exhibit No. 4: Plat Map Exhibit No.5: Zoning map The hearing opened with a presentation of.the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The property is located in northeast Renton at 2232 NE 24th Street, in an R-8 zone. Access would be from a new public street that would be Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 2 extended from NE 24th Street. Approximately 0.38 acre of the site would be a public street and turnaround. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage for density calculations;therefore,the net site area would be 1.4 acres,the density 7.86 dwelling units per net acre. The 11 lots would range in size from 4,565 square feet to 8,959 square feet,with the average lot size at 5,549.94 square feet. The Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner erred in stating that the half street improvements would require a modification from street standards. In actuality,the half street improvements are allowed in certain situations, but not unusual circumstances. This is a situation where it is anticipated that the property to the east would be developed eventually in a like manner;therefore the street could be completed in the future by the adjacent property owner and be full width. The half street would culminate in a cul-de-sac, and within the cul-de-sac area there would be allowable space for a turnaround that has been approved by the Fire Department. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill would be balanced on the site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated on November 7, 2000. The ERC made the following requirements for mitigation: The applicant shall install a silt ' fence,shallow drainage shall be constructed,daily review by the project contractor and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation control measures, and weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan. Mitigation measures also include payment of Transportation,Fire and Parks Mitigation Fees.The water quality • treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water . Manual. Ms. Higgins reviewed the project's compliance with Preliminary Plat Criteria including the objectives of protecting and enhancing Residential Single Family area,net development density ranges,minimum lot size and maximum height of structures. The project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element by increasing urban densities within the City which would result in fewer, shorter,vehicle trips. It is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element by adding an additional 9 houses to the 2 that are existing and increasing the City's housing supply. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Environmental Element. There are no sensitive areas on the property that fall within the Critical Areas Ordinance. Most of the trees on the property will be preserved. The project complies with the underlying zoning designation in terms of lot size, lot arrangement,property corners at intersections,and the reasonableness of proposed boundaries in terms of access,topography and relationship to existing uses. Public services are available at the present time,as confirmed by the Police,Fire, and Parks Departments. The project is located in the lower Cedar River drainage basin, draining into Lake Washington. There is an existing sanitary sewer line in NE 24th Street, and domestic water is also located in NE 24th Street. Frontage improvements would be required along NE 24th Street, including curb,gutter, sidewalks,and street lights. Similar improvements would be required on the new half street within the plat. An estimated five new students would be added to the Renton School district and would attend Kennydale Elementary,McKnight Middle School, and Hazen Senior High School. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC Mitigation Measures, and(2)the applicant must draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement with the City for maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. Jim Hanson,applicant representative, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane,Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 stated that the applicant agrees with the Report to the Hearing Examiner, as corrected regarding the modification issue on the half street. The half street is allowed by Code when it has the potential to serve adjacent property. This design • Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.:LUA-00-127,PP,ECF • January 16,2001 Page 3 was recommended by the City. There will be sufficient size for house construction on both lots 8 and 11. There is a 20 foot easement, 10 feet on each side,which would give sufficient space for residential construction on both the lots. Keith Demps, 2308 NE 24th Street,Renton,WA 98056 stated he owns the property directly to the east of the proposed development. He asked how the utilities on his property would be affected by the development Annette Demps,2308 NE 24th Street, Renton, WA 98056 asked if they should develop or sell to a developer their portion,the east half,will they be required to develop a whole new utility system; and will the utilities that are currently being put in be in a location that will not serve their portion in the future. Mr.Hanson stated that the 35 foot right-of-way is called a half street,but it is really more than a half street as far as right-of-way and street improvement is concerned. The typical right-of-way width for a residential street like this would be 50 feet. In this case there is 35 feet of the 50 feet being dedicated at this time,with 28 feet of paving and curb and sidewalk on one side. To finish the other half of the street would only take 15 feet,which would include more paving and a curb and sidewalk on the east side. The proposal for this plat is to run some of the utilities on the west side,primarily due to slope conditions,to serve the property on this plat. The stormwater system that would serve this plat is proposed to go down an easement on the west side. Sanitary sewer is proposed on the west side to serve this plat. The water main is proposed to be installed within the 35 foot right-of-way,which presumably would serve this plat and adjacent properties within 150 to 300 feet of the hydrants. Theoretically,when the half street is put in,the property to the east could finish those improvements and end up with a street that would comply with the City standards for a residential street. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton,WA'98055 stated that everything Mr. Hanson said is basically correct. Fifty feet wide is the general requirement for a residential street. If the lot to the east is developed,there is the option of asking for the street to be only 42 feet wide. Pavement, sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street lighting would still be required,as well as drainage, and sanitary sewer design. Any utilities within the dedicated right-of-way would be open for the use of the owner of the lot to the east . Mr.Demps asked several questions concerning utilities in the event of possible future development of his property. Ms.Demps asked if there is a plan for a temporary fence. Ms.Higgins stated that the slopes on the southern part of the property are not of concern, but they increase toward the back of the property. Mr.Hanson stated that the civil engineer commented about a possible slope easement on-the east side and if it existed it would be on the neighbor's property because it is beyond the line. The easement may not be needed. The reason the engineer added it is because the final street drawings are not completed and there is a slight change in elevation of the street. There are various ways of handling this. There could be a small retaining wall put in,or a slope easement. The engineer believes that since it is called a half street, a slope easement may be more appropriate. If not, it could be constructed without one. A fence is existing on the property; construction of a new fence has not been proposed. Mr. Demps stated that he would like to develop his property in the future and would like to work out the slope issue without the installation of a retaining wall. Jim Hanson -- - Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.:LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 4 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Jim Hanson, filed a request for approval of an 11-lot Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the north side of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Avenue NE on the west and Dayton Avenue NE on the east. The subject site is in the northeastern corner of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 1.78 acres or 77,505 square feet in area. The parcel is generally rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615 feet long(north to south)by approximately 126 feet wide. 7. The subject site has fairly level terrain with a low spot near the center of the subject site. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1822 enacted in March 1960. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses. 11. The subject site contains two residential structures. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 11 single family lots. 13. The lots range in size from 4,565 square feet to approximately 8,959 square feet. 14. The plat would be served by a new public cul-de-sac half street. Actually,the new street would be more like two-thirds of a street providing a right-of-way width of 35 feet. It is anticipated that the remainder of the street would be provided when the property immediately east is developed. The owner of that property was at the hearing and did express interest in eventually subdividing although no timeframe for such development was presented. • , Jim Hanson - Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat • • File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 5 15. Proposed Lots 1 to 8 and 11 would front on the new street. Proposed Lots 9 and 10 would be at the extreme north end of the plat and be served by a 20 foot easement through Proposed Lots 8 and 11. 16. Due to the topography of the site,the applicant proposed running the storm water and sewer lines along the western margin of the subject site. Staff and the neighbor to the east expressed concern for providing access to utilities from the east if they are not located in the proposed new street. The water line would be located in the street. 17. The developed site does not contain numerous trees and they probably will be removed to accommodate the division and development of new houses. 18. The Fire Department has approved the cul-de-sac and the half street for emergency access requirements. 19. Development of 11 single family homes will generate approximately 110 vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated that approximately 10%of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. Staff indicated that the roads can support this additional traffic. In addition,the applicant will be paying traffic mitigation fees. 20. The development would add approximately 5 new students to the school system. These students would be spread across the grades of the Renton School District 21. The applicant will have to work with staff and the adjacent property owner to the east to assure appropriate grade transitions between the developed roadway and that parcel's west boundary. 22. Storm water will be detained on the site and released to an in-street system. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat is in an area with adequate urban services. The proposed plat will create additional single family lots. 2. The half-street and half bulb of the cul-de-sac will be wide enough for emergency access and routine access to the lots. It will be appropriately improved as a public street. 3. The applicant will have to achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition is safe and stable. The City,applicant and eastern neighbor should work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities,particularly since this development is nominally predicated on the development of the remaining street by this eastern neighbor:-- 4. There will be additional noise and population once the development is occupied but none of it will be unusual for a single family community. The roadways have the capacity to handle the traffic that will be generated. 5. The development of the subject site will increase the tax base of the City. 6. The proposed density of 7.86 dwelling units per acre meets the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. This density and lot size is found on other properties in the area including those north and somewhat east of the subject site. Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall have to create a maintenance agreement for the detention facilities. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions enumerated below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with Mitigation Measures,which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either draft and record a"Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the city of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 3. The applicant shall achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. 4. The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities so that they may be used by the lot east of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 16th day of January,2001. FRED J.KAUF N HEARING E 1NER TRANSMI 1"1'ED THIS 16th day of January 2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins Keith Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Kayren Kittrick Annette Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon, WA 98274 Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat • ' File No.:LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of January,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., January 30,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both • the Hearing Examiner and.members.ofthe.City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . .0. . . C\ . — ---•-•-- ........ ... . I . ... D5 - 4 T23N R5E W 1/2 ---.2,46 - // Ci g -17- 7. — :.=;---1_.. Tee ! 1.--rr" ce/ ,! ', I , 1 \ •N 0- CZ -- _. . 1 ; _.., _cle,_4r1_ .,..,, 4.fr. 1 co -.,- -i-r-T-FLI -,., -:: • --.-: .___ti. :cell 1 L_c\2-81 . -_—__-_,L:"., --0-5( /..-1 Q0 I \_. CO co. . I ---T5-1A -----, 44 , I g • (d)8_s 1 1 . 1 1 - , - - . :if-- - .---NI ! 1- -I v ,miki, \ il mu _ c-- • - t- , .. ..... co ,_ _ . , es EWA& 1 ari II Ticy11-1101- 16111 P -.----- it Aio.1446._ . 1 I C‘2.1 .11111 '• - •-•:• --• :-- ' '4q_g- vitaand -pi, • i up • II ir —111111111.1 NIUE ___....o• -- Liz4 :in. _i_ri.oAv 0%tigi: , Ifirxrg-ii_ 1.111 -11,4 - pa 1 ilia . IIIIIIIPM - . I, im. f DI. v R .,. ... unimrs.Ais mg 1- ii- o• -41- --4-P-A-rur id 1111M-1 -1 g4 . - - A - !,.. E4 '•••••••=...•nrAll raw L IN .94V clqa1Pliaqi,V/L tiallp901111 NENE I lel II 4 1 tg aN anv• --7-.1 1 _E. . nil Bule 1mm - . .. . 31 VI 1111. MI • i? IIII, 00 - 1111 WINO 4: -1§4011111114--c7 ..-- 21 ---I-AgJblin. . • : My ,L 3 4 w I • . i . u R, lievicral gim ouna,, _ L- 1111.M NMI a i O. • 0 l'..-... I Wel I I- — 1 1-1 r— i Ill mill 11111 I 1 '. • . . 1 ii .. , .. . i J . iakT *any qaTTpn i. I . i . 111.1 . III I\ i 7 IL ' 111.11CLI-CL -II. 3 1--F. 17L11-11 il 1 it i [xi irliil 1 NI a. . . , 1• • I ..\ 40. . .______AN•immillhaatillial. . , w. --mom I 1 i i _ I - (O 4°) •• Z .. S ) 7 C. 0 N 0 LI 14 14V • • J,,, H ST �! e �'z Jl11SSW' 7/69 • _, .... I �....IzIf,.E''I ,j' !�__$.11l $ 12)4 l4) 4 222 :;az4222 L�OC�Jj If / 'N,9AI P.020-84 e 7 "'t4 U>■b I I IS L,l�i/, 240 237 I „E N Y D6�L E i•e • VS 6e 1 'I a IY V. Ii `•••0l02 � •3 PA'K 'DO a " ZR.3 I• 212.3 I • .if : AM, 25243 to - D troll «<...111 25Z.J /76/S JAW" 1Z 617 ^ /�242 Pi KI���I�t®I•isle �SiK\' ''"241 236 ws, J }a or; 16 8 ,2a3 , 4� 4/4 4 Oa.) L i u;�� to d y e 4�1 02tt = i 13 11 " ,, N.E_� ,, N '- �I 3243 Z i- Y o a I: o ...,2 v. ,•.1= ,^r1, c C li w ti N 106 Y '— 'Y I 1 I , 1 Al_ J 11 i 1 ry j((' I 12j 4 i 2521 I% TTT1 i n n 1 .SI, 17C:: k cif a mLdf CO 1 id L 24TH ,�_ - ST ;' J tT J . Er i .,'12z . F. [ 1 ���u'�' n so� ss'c41. - B---I 212, $Ia1 �'�.• - S 4 I • • • NE 24TH ST. PLAT CTIV Or RENTON CONTROL MONUMENT/Je9 ELEV..-J.17.37 FEET NIY0e3 • PER PLAT OF J.R.CAM ADO. 116TN AYE' SE.. ""' 6S _ _ r _ _ -• r30a/e• FD'JI bJr _�yf10 fOUNO LONG MON IN CASE E LAVE OF THE NE. I/4 SIC.3-7J-3 -mar. - - 1147.er 5 /pU ) rOLINO coNG MON IN)CASE NUM DELTA ARC RAdUS G OF RENTON OROrtK (BRLSS Gp w/p l) I CI 56'08'07' 53.81' 55.00' MOM AIL7?/1837 • C7 JJ'JJ'7J' J7.21' 33.00' ELEV..317.22 FEET N419ee . GL 4e'17.17' I6.8J' 33.00' OSLIEO 4-28-2000 gN I •.1... iI • 1 PI I , CARDfiN Of WAS04611Y. O. 4 • I "1.ht I Jo AN LAKE �I. I �-- I.N DD. ?°y ' / 3. C.P. D yIL A rRpCT 223 / ��" Nea o74oe£ \ R/1Y I' / 1 N'DOID fFMY K I EAST LINE OF THE W6l NCJO IYl I 'O coma YQN O/east ON PAIa?LLN£� lfYF or/ j1� \ '� rLM TO 9e%LEPYA . (BRASS GIP w/NIiO° / / ACCESS eI1.31' � (A7 JO'17T •/ RL PCACf ON 314 I - • 9 '/'6/AO -:"9s1�— e.41� +moo• A A R • ' •1� C9JllAS Al/� NE. CRAY[L DRNEM'AY ••,.N.I .. RO nut.PARCEL: ,'Z ARU e[OELYU}ED X ; - y /JJ4.T90-oe TO OfE CRY OF RfN.Tal '� A g j0 11\ " -"a. n Nq Jov7: `� I I /D. Tor �IacJ.ey�.• QK,(D �' �' II L NSD r9:w S!. a J347' 3a • moo. avec •,.. eao0•.�T oi In • 6ai098 PG;f'\ , • —- As,-—1 ——•—— �'L 1>'�3 / —l r— -1 r I r DECK ® _ E,E P yal„ :; r•y1/o'JOY7t—, 9119' _J % • I I '{b NCUSE , .� • 70= ——— Mr Fal rRE ? '' 2 `1. ` V. .1 ,^10� I I ) JC sq PENCEis 1'—-a4.7r•- '! - 0+•L'. -LJ3.041- — __„.,•:. So.,• s.0a' 7.030..,• — �' •mot--eRa7is a 1 Ntax .OF PROP. ,•, -- _ _- AYFJo 17T 613.70' '•, N • • WEST LINE OF FL7/eE to or REPLACCD JD4 7 C I .. nucr 7L j04�0r NEW MCC ON 1A'E 30 ; 91�REUOWO ES STRUCTURES ARE TO Iki • T Y PARCEL: TAY PARCEL: 2 36 /17e0 I /0ee0 Oa LEGEND: I • I TREE SCHEDULE: I • PLAT OR FOUND momenta AS SHOWN I I I I TOTAL TREE cow- 17 TREES L`_(YJ MIND 1/4 CORNER MON AS SHORN e'TRUNK OPMETER OR GREATER • / • SET 3/e'RESINAND CAP LS.29337 POINT/ OCSC. c 1 ALDER 4e' ■ SET 7Y7 LAVE STAKE 1 APPLE 71• -- X TRAVERSE POINTJ ALDER 10' 1 ALDER 5 ALDER %' GRAPHIC SCALE C/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT a ALOE)? 18' • 7 ALDER 17' RAM RICNT-01r-R40 3 FIR- 10' 0 9 NR- 10' I .d I .,, ,, i i. J 033E BLCOINO SCBICK LNC 10 FIR- 10' 'I,Iii .1`., A raw MORN? • 17 PINE-le' ; .Qr� D•�.,I • O soma LLVRpIE (IN FEET) s -We 1, E CENTERIME 1 Inch - 40 Et. + I �f • • it • O CONIFEROUS ; a:i .111..E F OEOfOWUS C LLL►L• Q • min.PoLE `� r l 1. • DWN.BY DATE JOB NO. EMW APRIL. 2000 JJCON-SIfLY • • • PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, R5E, W.M. 0-KO BY SCALE SHEET PALS !"6-40' 2 or 2 - AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 9, 2001 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION: "Days of Remembrance"—April 15 to April 22 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Renton Youth Day Program 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Council members in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Council member. a. Approval of Council minutes of April 2, 2001. Council concur. b. Community Services Department recommends approval of the annual interlocal agreement for waterfowl removal (continuation of the egg addling program and study), at a cost of$1,550. Council concur. c. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60%Notice of Intent to Annex for the proposed Lee Annexation; approximately 12 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave. NE (142nd Ave. SE) north of NE 9th St. (if extended) and west of 144th Ave. SE (if extended); and recommends a public hearing be set for 4/23/2001 to consider the petition. Council concur. d. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of a 2001 Budget Amendment Ordinance in the amount of$7,750,000, which amends the budget for several funds, including increasing Fund 316 for Highlands neighborhood improvements and 7th floor conference room; increasing the Insurance Fund; and placing money in reserve for meeting the requirements of Initiative 722 if necessary. Council concur. (See agenda item 10. for ordinance.) 4 e. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Jacques 24th Street preliminary '� plat; 11 single-family lots on 1.78 acres located on NE 24th St. between Aberdeen Ave. NE and Edmonds Ave. NE (PP-00-127). Council concur. •` f. Legal Division recommends approval of a contract with Warren, Barber &Fontes, P.S. for legal IT-- services. Refer to Finance Committee. g. Transportation Division recommends approval of a consultant contract with Pavement Consultants, Inc., in the amount of$71,080, to conduct a comprehensive pavement management system study for the airport. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee. 8. CORRESPONDENCE (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) CIT. OF RENTON City Clerk _ s_kfr Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 10, 2001 Jim Hanson _ 17446 Mallard Cove Lane • Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 " Re: Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Request; File No. PP-00-127 • Dear Jim: At the regular Council meeting of April 9, 2001,the Renton City Council approved the - - referenced preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the hearing examiner's recommendation, dated January 16, 2001, and his subsequent response to your request for reconsideration, dated February 5, 2001. Pursuant to RCW, a final plat meeting all :requirements of State law and Renton Municipal Code shall be submitted to the City for approval within five years of the date of preliminary plat apprOval. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. . , Sincerely, • , Marilyn .. City Clerk/Cable Manager - cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Dan Clawson Elizabeth Higgins,Development Services Division Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner . _ efltoTh . : •-; ; • ' ;,••. • 1901 2001 • -4055 Smith GraCly Way - RenfOn, Wa§11ingt6n 98055 (425) 430-6510 /FAX (425) 430-6516 Y('": „zy•;"`q • •• • • `.'6P'4,gVI-.‘1:-.-,741-'1 ,42>* t..* This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer 42;t1A1 - . Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor :. April'2, 2001 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard"Cove Lane :. Mt. Vernon, WA 98274' . ' Re: Jacques'24"' Street.Plat File No.LUA00-127,PP,ECF Dear Mr. Hanson: r' The,Hearing:Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the:above referenced.matter, Which was issued on January 16,.2001_and the.Request•for Reconsideration were not appealed: Therefore, this matter is:being g submitted to the Cityy,Cler'k this date;for:transmittal_-to the.City Council for review. . ;,f.; 3 ' You will receive notification of final:approval:fromtl e',City Clerk, and will be notified of all . action takenby'the City Council upon approval of the request„< .;<`': Please feel'free.to contact this.off ce if further:assistance:.or information is required:• . Sincerely; • • Fred J. Kaufman: Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Elizabeth Higgins;Project Manager - • . " Sandi Seeger, Development Services : •" • • 1901 2001 1055 South Grad .Wa Renton:'Washin t on 98055':.=-4 • :: :'" :: This paper contains 50/recycled material;20%,post consumer :::'• :";: 4C�„� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE WEST HALF OF TRACT 223, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WA. GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEA TTLE DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 82, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ALL SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. JACQUES 24TH STREET PLAT LUAoo-127 , PP , ECF - - 4r� CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 2001 TO: Joan Thompson FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Jacques 24th Street Plat,LUA-00-127,PP Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced legal description submittal and have the same comment concerning this legal as was noted in our review memo dated October 23, 2000. Lines 5 and 6 of said legal repeat lines 2 and 3 of the legal. The last two lines of the legal description should be removed. See the attachment. In addition,the pertinent quarter section, section,township and range should be added to the end of the subject legal description. In this case,this addition should read as"All situate in the Northeast quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M., City of Renton,King County, Washington." \H:\FILE.SYS\LND\10\0362\RV010228.doc • Lo-/ 7 IoP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE WEST HALF OF TRACT 223, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WA. GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 82, IN KING COUNTY, WASH -eARBSY----0E-EBEN-A001170N-E9-55174EE-9JVISION NO. 4, -AGG6R9ING-F9-714E-PIAT-THEREGF,--REGORBEG-IN-VGL-WME- • - CIT.` l.�F•• "RENTON ' . . Hearin Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor . Fred J;Kaufman : • February 5,2001 • Jim Hanson • 17446 Mallard.Cove Lane Mt.Vernon,.WA 98274 • -. RE: Request for Reconsideration for Jacques NE 240 St:Plat;LUA00-127;PP,ECF Dear Mr:Hanson: • This office has reviewed your request for reconsideration in this matter and the response follows • The concern raised was with the wording of Condition#3,which states:. - 3. The applicant shall achieve agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that • any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. 'The concern you raised is that the City was not included and that the applicant could be subject to a"veto" by the easterly neighbor.' ;t • - This office is willing to alter the language and add the City,but wants.assurance that the eastern neighbor is ' not left with a substantial grading.effort:when.andf if they-develop,their property. As it now stands,the. reason the applicant was permitted to•dev.elop a"'half:street"was`the forecastthat the other half will be - • constructed,and constructed,in some reasonable timeframe. It would be unfair if the applicant creates a road and grade that reduces:.their.costs;but:creates an unduel'burden on the neighbor when that half of the, road is developed because substantiali,grade differences.were created and substantial_grading is required.:Iri • other words,the common read that will be ultimately;:developed must be a'reasonable compromise between the current applicant and the'eastern piopertyowner. r=;: :;':;. Condition#3 shall be changed to read as follows: • . 3: :The applicant,the;City and,the'eastern neighbor.shall:achieve agreement to y,. ` ' assure that any-grade transition for the-new_road is`safe,aud stable.and that the parties compromise to equally share;the'burden:required by the grade changes between:the two parcels t'o create'a.read.that serves the public use and-interest. '. If this office can be of further assistance,please feelfree towrite: Sincerely; Fred J.Kaufman . Hearing Examiner FJK:jt Chief Administrative.Officer cc:, Mayor Jesse Tanner , , . .Jay Covmgton i . - Larry_Warren,City.Attorney , Neil`Watts,"Development Services Elizabeth Higgins,Development Services" ' Parties of Record'. ;ate 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055:'q425) 430.-6515. : :.'- , t: This'paper contains 50%recycledmatenal 20I post consumer; en , Hanson Consulting Jim Hanson (360)422-5056 1-29-01 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Wy Renton Wa. 98055 Subject: Request for reconsideration for LUA00-127,PP,ECF, Jacques NE 24th ST.Plat Dear Mr.Examiner: We are hereby requesting that you reconsider the wording of item#3 of your recommendation on the above referenced Plat. As stated in the hearing,the applicant is willing to work with the City and the eastern neighbor to achieve usable and safe grades for the new city street and any transition to the neighbors property. The wording in recommendation#3 leaves the City out of the review of the grades for the new street and at the same time gives the neighbor to the east veto power over the whole plat by just refusing to enter an"agreement"for the street grades and transition. We suggest wording similar to the wording used in item#4, as follows: The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate grades for the new street and to assure that any grade transition for the new street is safe and stable. Thank you for your reconsideration of item#3 of your recommendation. We will look forward to receiving your revised condition. Sin erely, ,//4 #(11/0 N NMINWI! mil im Hanson al JAN 3 0 2001 I LI)' CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Hanson Consulting Jim Hanson (360)422-5056 1-29-01 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Wy Renton Wa. 98055 Subject: Request for reconsideration for LUA00-127,PP,ECF, Jacques NE 24th ST.Plat Dear Mr.Examiner: We are hereby requesting that you reconsider the wording of item#3 of your recommendation on the above referenced Plat. As stated in the hearing,the applicant is willing to work with the City and the eastern neighbor to achieve usable and safe grades for the new city street and any transition to the neighbors property. The wording in recommendation#3 leaves the City out of the review of the grades for the new street and at the same time gives the neighbor to the east veto power over the whole plat by just refusing to enter an"agreement"for the street grades and transition. We suggest wording similar to the wording used in item#4, as follows: The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate grades for the new street and to assure that any grade transition for the new street is safe and stable. Thank you for your reconsideration of item#3 of your recommendation. We will look forward to receiving your revised condition. Sin erely, ,,,,r4 #C0/0/14—j ,/im Hanson JAN 3 0 2001 _j CITY OF RENTON ..HEARING EXAMINER Jan 29 01 01 : 35p Jana 4225056 p. l r ' CITY OF RENTON /, sap • JAN 2 9 2001 Hanson Consulting RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE Fax Transmittal Form To: F Je: k L'.7AI! M From:F�l 3 , m Ai A Nra Fax number: 430 - (��/(o Phone number:436D-9-22-Sost Phone number: q3 -CAS r Pages including cover: '� Re: RE-or/vs '2. 14.7.,C.)/, Date: //-Z 7-0 I /-? to r Poo< VA-c 1—eas 4-1-4- ST. 'P LAM Comments: Jr )44 u Lc r is /R•Q tt s 7_. 4v a 'v /-2 9-4 I, PGAAS"E_ FOR( 11tg If you do not receive all pages of this Fax transmission please call me at 360-422-5056. Thank you: Jim Hanson, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane,Mt. Vernon, Wa. 98274. Jan 29 01 01 : 35p Jana 4225056 p. e e A. CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 9 2001 Hanson Consulting RECEIVED Jim Hanson CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (360) 422-5056 1-29-01 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Wy Renton Wa. 98055 Subject: Request for reconsideration for LUA00-127,PP,ECF, Jacques NE 24th ST. Plat Dear Mr.Examiner: We are hereby requesting that you reconsider the wording of item#3 of your recommendation on the above referenced Plat. As stated in the hearing, the applicant is willing to work with the City and the eastern neighbor to achieve usable and safe grades for the new city street and any transition to the neighbors property. The wording in recommendation#3 leaves the City out of the review of the grades for the new street and at the same time gives the neighbor to the east veto power over the whole plat by just refusing to enter an"agreement"for the street grades and transition. We suggest wording similar to the wording used in item#4, as follows: The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate grades for the new street and to assure that any grade transition for the new street is safe and stable. Thank you for your reconsideration of item#3 of your recommendation. We will look forward to receiving your revised condition. Sin erely, _in 4realsek-/ un Hanson pi) N M (I 0 W N 11 all JAN 2 9 2001 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER !// AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) 71) �- - ?d>z��-,being first duly sworn,upon oath, depo`s'es and states: That on the /C` day of /, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed e � eYoP e s) cont ' a decision or recommendation with . ,� ng postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. ----- Signature: SUBSCRIBE11.ANJ pV0RN to before me this/�o day of , 2001. Noje e =6'13 moo= ©o D, /-e-var-a",42 Zo rp��Ra� ' ; Not ublic ' and for the State of Washington, Residing a therein. 111,717'Zf1S - Application,Petition, or Case No.: Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat LUA00-127,PP,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: —1•e• SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER �" �' 0� Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Correspondence.. File No. LUA00-127,PP,ECF Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Other Request for Reconsideration and Response RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept Approval of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Jacques 24`h Street Preliminary Plat was published on January 16, 2001. A request for reconsideration was received on January 30, 2001 and the Examiner altered Condition 3 of the Recommendation as requested by the applicant. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, subject to the clarification of conditions outlined in the response, and the conditions outlined on page 6 of the Report and Recommendation. This office.notes that the conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Jacques 24`h Street Preliminary Plat. 1 - .Y. ._ . CITE OF RENTON. tal !I -,, Hearing Examiner • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman • February 5,2001 • Jim Hanson 0 17446 Mallard.Cove Lane . Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 RE: Request for Reconsideration for Jacques NE 24th St.Plat,LUA00-127,PP,ECF Dear Mr.Hanson: This office has reviewed your request for reconsideration in this matter and the response follows. The concern raised was with the wording of Condition#3,which states: 3. The applicant shall achieve agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. 'The concern you raised is that the City was not included and that the applicant could be subject to a"veto" - . by the easterly neighbor. • This office is willing to alter the language and add the City,but wants assurance that the eastern neighbor is not left with a substantial grading effort when and if they develop their property. As it now stands,the reason the applicant was permitted to develop a"half-street"was the forecast that the other half will be . • constructed,and constructed,in some reasonable timeframe. It would be unfair if the applicant creates a road and grade that reduces their costs,but creates an undue burden on the neighbor when that half of the road is developed because substantial grade differences were created and substantial grading is required. In • other words,the common road that will be ultimately_develop ed must be a reasonable compromise between the current applicant and the eastern property owner. = . - . Condition#3 shall be changed to read as follows: ' 3. The applicant,the City and the eastern neighbor shall achieve agreement to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable and that the parties compromise to equally share.the burden required by the grade changes • . between the two parcels to create'a road that serves the public use and interest. If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write.' Sincerely, i . Fred J.Kaufman . -- ' Hearing Examiner - - • FJK:jt . •cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner •:_ - . Ja• y Covington,Chief Administrative Officer • Larry Warren,City.Attorney • • - •Neil Watts,Development Services . - . Elizabeth Higgins,Development Services • Parties of Record . . ' `- l\ ' 1jZ 1901C200 • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055. (425) 430-6515 ,. .._•y-r",y ,,;r„><;� . Hanson Consulting Jim Hanson (360)422-5056 1-29-01 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Wy . Renton Wa. 98055 Subject: Request for reconsideration for LUA00-127,PP,ECF, Jacques NE 24th ST.Plat Dear Mr.Examiner: We are hereby requesting that you reconsider the wording of item#3 of your recommendation on the above referenced Plat. As stated in the hearing,the applicant is willing to work with the City and the eastern neighbor to achieve usable and safe grades for the new city street and any transition to the neighbors property. The wording in recommendation#3 leaves the City out of the review of the grades for the new street and at the same time gives the neighbor to the east veto power over the whole plat by just refusing to enter an"agreement"for the street grades and transition. We suggest wording similar to the wording used in item#4, as follows: The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate grades for the new street and to assure that any grade transition for the new street is safe and stable. Thank you for your reconsideration of item#3 of your recommendation. We will look forward to receiving your revised condition. Sin erely, . im Hanson 1 _Jo 8 efx00--/ idJAN 3 0 2001 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER January 16, 2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon, WA 98274 File No.: LUA00-127,PP,ECF LOCATION: NE 24th Street,between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 77,505 sf(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on December 27, 2000. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 2, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 2,2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Cover sheet Exhibit No.4: Plat Map Exhibit No.5: Zoning map The hearing opened with a presentation of.the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The property is located in northeast Renton at 2232 NE 24th Street, in an R-8 zone. Access would be from a new public street that would be Jim Hanson - Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 2 extended from NE 24th Street. Approximately 0.38 acre of the site would be a public street and turnaround. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage for density calculations;therefore,the net site area would be 1.4 acres,the density 7.86 dwelling units per net acre. The 11 lots would range in size from 4,565 square feet to 8,959 square feet,with the average lot size at 5,549.94 square feet. The Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner erred in stating that the half street improvements would require a modification from street standards. In actuality,the half street improvements are allowed in certain situations, but not unusual circumstances. This is a situation where it is anticipated that the property to the east would be developed eventually in a like manner;therefore the street could be completed in the future by the adjacent property owner and be full width. The half street would culminate in a cul-de-sac,and within the cul-de-sac area there would be allowable space for a turnaround that has been approved by the Fire Department. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill would be balanced on the site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated on November 7,2000. The ERC made the following requirements for mitigation: The applicant shall install a silt fence, shallow drainage shall be constructed,daily review by the project contractor and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation control measures, and weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan. Mitigation measures also include payment of Transportation,Fire and Parks Mitigation Fees. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Ms. Higgins reviewed the project's compliance with Preliminary Plat Criteria including the objectives of protecting and enhancing Residential Single Family area,net development density ranges,minimum lot size and maximum height of structures. The project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element by increasing urban densities within the City which would result in fewer, shorter,vehicle trips. It is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element by adding an additional 9 houses to the 2 that are existing and increasing the City's housing supply. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Environmental Element. There are no sensitive areas on the property that fall within the Critical Areas Ordinance. Most of the trees on the property will be preserved. The project complies with the underlying zoning designation in terms of lot size, lot arrangement,property corners at intersections,and the reasonableness of proposed boundaries in terms of access,topography and relationship to existing uses. Public services are available at the present time,as confirmed by the Police,Fire,and Parks Departments. The project is located in the lower Cedar River drainage basin, draining into Lake Washington. There is an existing sanitary sewer line in NE 24th Street, and domestic water is also located in NE 24th Street. Frontage improvements would be required along NE 24th Street, including curb,gutter, sidewalks, and street lights. Similar improvements would be required on the new half street within the plat. An estimated five new students would be added to the Renton School district and would attend Kennydale Elementary,McKnight Middle School,and Hazen Senior High School. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC Mitigation Measures,and(2)the applicant must draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement with the City for maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. Jim Hanson, applicant representative, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane,Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 stated that the applicant agrees with the Report to the Hearing Examiner, as corrected regarding the modification issue on the half street. The half street is allowed by Code when it has the potential to serve adjacent property. This design Jim Hanson Jacques 24'h Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 3 was recommended by the City. There will be sufficient size for house construction on both lots 8 and 11. There is a 20 foot easement, 10 feet on each side,which would give sufficient space for residential construction on both the lots. Keith Demps,2308 NE 24th Street,Renton,WA 98056 stated he owns the property directly to the east of the proposed development. He asked how the utilities on his property would be affected by the development Annette Demps,2308 NE 24'h Street, Renton, WA 98056 asked if they should develop or sell to a developer their portion, the east half, will they be required to develop a whole new utility system; and will the utilities that are currently being put in be in a location that will not serve their portion in the future. Mr.Hanson stated that the 35 foot right-of-way is called a half street,but it is really more than a half street as far as right-of-way and street improvement is concerned. The typical right-of-way width for a residential street like this would be 50 feet. In this case there is 35 feet of the 50 feet being dedicated at this time,with 28 feet of paving and curb and sidewalk on one side. To finish the other half of the street would only take 15 feet,which would include more paving and a curb and sidewalk on the east side. The proposal for this plat is to run some of the utilities on the west side,primarily due to slope conditions, to serve the property on this plat. The stormwater system that would serve this plat is proposed to go down an easement on the west side. Sanitary sewer is proposed on the west side to serve this plat. The water main is proposed to be installed within the 35 foot right-of-way,which presumably would serve this plat and adjacent properties within 150 to 300 feet of the hydrants. Theoretically,when the half street is put in,the property to the east could finish those improvements and end up with a street that would comply with the City standards for a residential street. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 stated that everything Mr. Hanson said is basically correct. Fifty feet wide is the general requirement for a residential street. If the lot to the east is developed,there is the option of asking for the street to be only 42 feet wide. Pavement, sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street lighting would still be required, as well as drainage, and sanitary sewer design. Any utilities within the dedicated right-of-way would be open for the use of the owner of the lot to the east. Mr. Demps asked several questions concerning utilities in the event of possible future development of his property. Ms.Demps asked if there is a plan for a temporary fence. Ms. Higgins stated that the slopes on the southern part of the property are not of concern,but they increase toward the back of the property. Mr. Hanson stated that the civil engineer commented about a possible slope easement on the east side and if it existed it would be on the neighbor's property because it is beyond the line. The easement may not be needed. The reason the engineer added it is because the final street drawings are not completed and there is a slight change in elevation of the street. There are various ways of handling this. There could be a small retaining wall put in,or a slope easement. The engineer believes that since it is called a half street, a slope easement may be more appropriate. If not, it could be constructed without one. A fence is existing on the property;construction of a new fence has not been proposed. Mr.Demps stated that he would like to develop his property in the future and would like to work out the slope issue without the installation of a retaining wall. Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 4 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Jim Hanson, filed a request for approval of an 11-lot Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the north side of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Avenue NE on the west and Dayton Avenue NE on the east. The subject site is in the northeastern corner of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 1.78 acres or 77,505 square feet in area. The parcel is generally rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615 feet long(north to south)by approximately 126 feet wide. 7. The subject site has fairly level terrain with a low spot near the center of the subject site. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1822 enacted in March 1960. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses. 11. The subject site contains two residential structures. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 11 single family lots. 13. The lots range in size from 4,565 square feet to approximately 8,959 square feet. 14. The plat would be served by a new public cul-de-sac half street. Actually,the new street would be more like two-thirds of a street providing a right-of-way width of 35 feet. It is anticipated that the remainder of the street would be provided when the property immediately east is developed. The owner of that property was at the hearing and did express interest in eventually subdividing although no timeframe for such development was presented. Jim Hanson - Jacques 24`h Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 5 15. Proposed Lots 1 to 8 and 11 would front on the new street. Proposed Lots 9 and 10 would be at the extreme north end of the plat and be served by a 20 foot easement through Proposed Lots 8 and 11. 16. Due to the topography of the site,the applicant proposed running the storm water and sewer lines along the western margin of the subject site. Staff and the neighbor to the east expressed concern for providing access to utilities from the east if they are not located in the proposed new street. The water line would be located in the street. 17. The developed site does not contain numerous trees and they probably will be removed to accommodate the division and development of new houses. 18. The Fire Department has approved the cul-de-sac and the half street for emergency access requirements. 19. Development of 11 single family homes will generate approximately 110 vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated that approximately 10% of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. Staff indicated that the roads can support this additional traffic. In addition,the applicant will be paying traffic mitigation fees. 20. The development would add approximately 5 new students to the school system. These students would be spread across the grades of the Renton School District 21. The applicant will have to work with staff and the adjacent property owner to the east to assure appropriate grade transitions between the developed roadway and that parcel's west boundary. 22. Storm water will be detained on the site and released to an in-street system. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat is in an area with adequate urban services. The proposed plat will create additional single family lots. 2. The half-street and half bulb of the cul-de-sac will be wide enough for emergency access and routine access to the lots. It will be appropriately improved as a public street. 3. The applicant will have to achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition is safe and stable. The City,applicant and eastern neighbor should work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities,particularly since this development is nominally predicated on the development of the remaining street by this eastern neighbor. 4. There will be additional noise and population once the development is occupied but none of it will be unusual for a single family community. The roadways have the capacity to handle the traffic that will be generated. 5. The development of the subject site will increase the tax base of the City. 6. The proposed density of 7.86 dwelling units per acre meets the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. This density and lot size is found on other properties in the area including those north and somewhat east of the subject site. Jim Hanson - Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16, 2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall have to create a maintenance agreement for the detention facilities. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions enumerated below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with Mitigation Measures,which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the city of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 3. The applicant shall achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. 4. The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities so that they may be used by the lot east of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 16th day of January,2001. ket FRED J.KAUF AN HEARING E INER TRANSMI ITED THIS 16th day of January 2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins Keith Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Kayren Kittrick Annette Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon, WA 98274 Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16, 2001 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of January,2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., January 30,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. a . 01 I . q\... . . .. .-.....-..-. D5 - 4 T23N R5E W 1/2 ---ca,40 - \C.z• cCIoe /-/--.1!'i'\-"---j.;1T--i1 iI&-I rI'-i-r 1---i1_i t-.1-.gra_l "_Ll-_--if---T.. --_---1--7-. --a.-._:nr1----1--1t,ih,...._. --_-.-..n"P--1-.i.Ir0-,I1 1.1I11 111'-".---..-. _•i----c-c—e-1,-----+--7u-!S 4sc-re;---Ic,-Lo-'-Y—)-.•--,-;:,7 .• ---T . 1 -1--- --11-41-1. - idip:: _1_90,17 161-1 IN L _V 14 1 •tly- P ut...0P P III _i_. 1,,,H. ,!" IL 1 1 I j • o II I- I --ik.1 - -e?)15N ril* 7:-._-_ _Eih-.:---1 21Ni i'Aiv 11 I ' INTs 1 1 J — i 6 en / .1 e.1 1:4 ,...._ 1• \s'lif sziri ____ck. • --1.. ([2.44 1 " JItckAi_ ri,___ ciapik 1 ... • 0 I -Cd_e A is _ii_ _ 0i ___. II I Elii i ‘1..xm6 Inns --1. 11111 H - . _1 . .. . cv IIMM :.iv: _:-.- - :-._. lio_k_ OMNI •P I i• NI- rain NIB _ • _ 1111mm II III •.• _• 1 ::: 1 .. . , . - • - z • __J_Ico g - LIZ mom 4c:2' lx Tim!. 1_ l'aAy. Ortga— ii,FL l '-is c. 1 .. 1 a r NNE .... Impute _ iiiiiiridAn NA 1 r- -41 11 .._..= —1 A •—(.2. iii i 1 - - siv, •,•,..,, ; iii:,.:::::„,. alio pm _Li, 1 1 HAN 'atilt tilqaPiagiV/L- jill -- -IL Li 1 1 _____ '.e.i...,..: Ars ;-... 7 'RD, iii-7 — • 1 _ Ii a 1i'; 1 E !P 1 1 111410111 —wi- -5 mcmiLY .1e6 - • -- :. F- al a, • — •$. . ipr A i tcl ittstaimmtifiLaAv_ yieeitiyt _rt_i :-_\2_, 41.84a, pi il 4---LII . CT g . la& 'I ulourl ..:0 '--' if 1 • • 1 1 I 1 I I _,?_. 0 D is P-s 1 7r,F-1_71 i r- , a F . n•cazo*- ' I I _ I I LY F'0111Effili gm ot11101, I L- 1 — — .• . . . I 1 I — --I 1 IT i NE r,8 - 1 -- • . i ,-- --_-.1:1411 ” ld.ololit . . allfi)ri 11 . . 1 . ILL, I ' • ' ' 0 t \ --I ail-a 1 1 J °- ii ; - 1 N ad i 1 . + ) ', all •1 , I 1 - Q00) ... Z ... S 7 Zeica1 -41 C.1-ai 0 N 00 LIV•,<-4 N rIN7 . . - .,.., • I t, • I • ' -st . ... ....... -. dtgl 2233,5.. $t69 prp....-_-,- ... .14 _ i 1.•••aii..281 0 I%...‘ i.. 60l,2) 01 s, 0 2.2.t 2 b.22o2E,•.L,=.A 6I [:..i a,"14(le 4, F02•-84 k . I . _,, 240 A237 NYDLJ L• - 66 A!of 1 I t Pill( .D.D ..,..;4 . 3.. •04 52.3 II 2I2. .. 252.63 ao 252.1 IZ&,5 /22./ .... /2631,, 'CU :3 t. 2 -- tt Igilt:6. 4 g r: tilli t.o. ------,,-, no , •..,, . ,.., • ..0£...1" et s, 236 ..v :. •:. ttf__„ • 0.3 ,_ • ., . r-77 Mid 0 CL • - '' 40. Int -- -t--- 13 M it'>Cc1. cCo t°_1IZw7U_1_ .li 4 ...Co, r ‘ 3....., r 0 - ,o L w V7 r' -1 MI W •it 1 Wilk e Ai I ,, 1. 45,, i 253 I I% 7/. PSI' -. I f.1 I, 101.31 CO A CO S. i , 24TH , - . ST. • )'- • ... go 1.. az 1,17.1 :. ligipapE '"'" 4,11w rr4c, ______j 212g R , -:l''l• . lin 0 •a ...5 • 4. • i"... • 4228 242 ; 2 : i•• M 26 -.•.. -- 2.3 I .• NE 24TH ST. PLAT I • ►—� 1/4 COR.OP SEC a-7.1- • �" I CRY or C. [MRE 9 CONTROL • ELEY.-332.e7 FEET AMMO PER FUAT OF 1R GREiN ADO. 116TX AVE. SE. ea Pa u - - - coma' nctl wt _�«f FOUND LONG NON M cur L lMC OF ME NE 1/4 0f SEC.5-93-5 JJ7.e1• - - 1717•a7• e �.�pLJ FOUND CONG NON XV CASE NON DELTA ARC RADIUS 18RASS dPROV1ON • (ARA£S GP W/MR,CH) I CI Se'O8'07' uet' 57.00' ENT/1e37 C2 37'J32J' 32.21' 55.00' ELEY.-317.22 FEET N4V088 CJ 4e•47'17' 4 Ler' e5.00 WNW 4-28-2000 �D • 01 °� t� I I q JN°r°v N° 4 I till g KS a pS 1,6 J80 �I JD g �' It SJ�ps�Jr, I j I ,}JL011 ADD' r lO / J// ee 1I \ ' . C.D. JJ cr 223 (( ( '` • Ne9'OYCA \- Air 11000 FENCE 5 I EAST LINE OF ENE MST r• \ 5 1 J47 I ��potato CONC. us[ - ON PROP.LIVE ' /IfYF%�� J� ') I EI FENCE.ON . Jls Nv]o�rf - -— ACCESS S1 t.J7' NO'J0177 I �� I 'I r;(D1 - / a49=1 440.00' / ., .• •. .. 1i •1 CAMAS AVE. NE. 3 I ^CRAvfE DRIVEWAY _-' • • 4 I.1 PARCEL: . _ _ \ y S /JJu9o-oero nr cm graTkD X i,tDD I8 iae\ ��v. 0 Nq'Jo'47, -POR 9 ^_! I /'� I L N5Sw a3142' Sa •• 00' a0 — 80.00'• ,al,. P J'�1 -- - — —.—— ao•L IJA CS ,-- r— r .�.I�4 r— l• ® EI 10.Nib-• 98' it r-No•Jov7T-1 914➢' J �� ; I p\ NCUSE i n •' d I m' r ESMr roR EhCJ7E5S• nRf � __I 1 R 5CARPOR ar. 41041 ry I I • 4 I• ' 9 gl A ' E AND 8 a I 6 5 g q O i I �3 ', W Z �ro OVA 1 I qe ram^ g 1•R .J L 039 L OS&—J LBM :5:, L-BSBL L.�S': '�el '+ // I I I /Va 3oe------- X mop FLAt£/S-1 1 L.--54.71•- J -L�1P_ -rJe.o4�- —— 71. Do , ! 00' 1.00 N.or PROP. ` °¢• .,y a - <__SO'?• -'-=•-^�Dt<�y•I LINE N0'JOL7T 51570' I W r • WEST lMC a I_S,.er FINCE mFE CC REPLACED 4 02 �I .. TRACT 27J •N01E:ALL EX/SANO STRUCTURES APE TO I R£REUOVEO TAX PARCEL: I TAY PARCEL: • 236 /1280 I /0060 rib('r I Jo• Jo• 1 1 W • LEGEND: TREE SCHEDULE: I k1 ft Or FLAT OR FOUND A1MIwaFT AS straw TOTALtREF COUNT- 17 TREES I I cO. MAD 1/4 CORNEA EON AS 940AN e'TRUNK DANCER OR GREATER -_ • SET S/e'REBUT G E.AND P 5 2DSJ7 POINT/ DESG • ■ SET 252 LOVE STAKE 1 ALDER 4' 7 ALPLE 2 _ 3 ALDER 10' TRAVERSE POOR a ALDER ALDER 12' GRAPHIC SCALE C/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT 6 ALDER NI' - 7 ALDER 12' • R/lr RvIT-CF-N4Y a FIR- 10- o : 9 FIR- 10' �� rrrrr rii rii_.I WELL BLOWING SETB/CX LIVE FIR- 10' I 1�•�� 1'.> II 'NAME- 17' f rr••/1 `• A Fm JADRANT 12 PINE- Ie' ,� ,O sE»fa EUN1rolE (IN FEET) • l.,T6 cEN/Emn+E 1 Inch 40 It. • v ' CONIFEROUS ,, Q!•1 rt L'' ' ' 0h DECIDUOUS - •'A•AL LAIR Y URLJT7 POLE I � Ili • 6/4/2000 OWN.BY DATE - JOB Na. fMW APRIL• 2000 JJCON-54.FLY • PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, R5E. W.M. 0 BY scALEEr • AILS !1.40' 2 cr 2 January 16,2001 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 File No.: LUA00-127,PP,ECF LOCATION: NE 24`'' Street,between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE in northeast Renton SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 77,505 sf(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on December 27,2000. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 2, 2001 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 2, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Preliminary Plat application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Cover sheet Exhibit No.4: Plat Map Exhibit No.5: Zoning map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The property is located in northeast Renton at 2232 NE 24th Street, in an R-8 zone. Access would be from a new public street that would be Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 2 extended from NE 24th Street. Approximately 0.38 acre of the site would be a public street and turnaround. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage for density calculations;therefore,the net site area would be 1.4 acres,the density 7.86 dwelling units per net acre. The 11 lots would range in size from 4,565 square feet to 8,959 square feet,with the average lot size at 5,549.94 square feet. The Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner erred in stating that the half street improvements would require a modification from street standards. In actuality,the half street improvements are allowed in certain situations, but not unusual circumstances. This is a situation where it is anticipated that the property to the east would be developed eventually in a like manner;therefore the street could be completed in the future by the adjacent property owner and be full width. The half street would culminate in a cul-de-sac, and within the cul-de-sac area there would be allowable space for a turnaround that has been approved by the Fire Department. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill would be balanced on the site. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated on November 7, 2000. The ERC made the following requirements for mitigation: The applicant shall install a silt fence, shallow drainage shall be constructed,daily review by the project contractor and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation control measures, and weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan. Mitigation measures also include payment of Transportation,Fire and Parks Mitigation Fees. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual. Ms.Higgins reviewed the project's compliance with Preliminary Plat Criteria including the objectives of protecting and enhancing Residential Single Family area,net development density ranges,minimum lot size and maximum height of structures. The project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element by increasing urban densities within the City which would result in fewer, shorter,vehicle trips. It is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element by adding an additional 9 houses to the 2 that are existing and increasing the City's housing supply. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Environmental Element. There are no sensitive areas on the property that fall within the Critical Areas Ordinance. Most of the trees on the property will be preserved. The project complies with the underlying zoning designation in terms of lot size, lot arrangement,property corners at intersections,and the reasonableness of proposed boundaries in terms of access,topography and relationship to existing uses. Public services are available at the present time, as confirmed by the Police,Fire,and Parks Departments. The project is located in the lower Cedar River drainage basin, draining into Lake Washington. There is an existing sanitary sewer line in NE 24th Street, and domestic water is also located in NE 24th Street. Frontage improvements would be required along NE 24th Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lights. Similar improvements would be required on the new half street within the plat. An estimated five new students would be added to the Renton School district and would attend Kennydale Elementary,McKnight Middle School, and Hazen Senior High School. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC Mitigation Measures, and(2)the applicant must draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement with the City for maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. Jim Hanson, applicant representative, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 stated that the applicant agrees with the Report to the Hearing Examiner, as corrected regarding the modification issue on the half street. The half street is allowed by Code when it has the potential to serve adjacent property. This design Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 3 was recommended by the City. There will be sufficient size for house construction on both lots 8 and 11. There is a 20 foot easement, 10 feet on each side,which would give sufficient space for residential construction on both the lots. Keith Demps, 2308 NE 24th Street,Renton,WA 98056 stated he owns the property directly to the east of the proposed development. He asked how the utilities on his property would be affected by the development Annette Demps,2308 NE 24th Street,Renton, WA 98056 asked if they should develop or sell to a developer their portion,the east half,will they be required to develop a whole new utility system; and will the utilities that are currently being put in be in a location that will not serve their portion in the future. Mr.Hanson stated that the 35 foot right-of-way is called a half street,but it is really more than a half street as far as right-of-way and street improvement is concerned. The typical right-of-way width for a residential street like this would be 50 feet. In this case there is 35 feet of the 50 feet being dedicated at this time,with 28 feet of paving and curb and sidewalk on one side. To finish the other half of the street would only take 15 feet,which would include more paving and a curb and sidewalk on the east side. The proposal for this plat is to run some of the utilities on the west side,primarily due to slope conditions,to serve the property on this plat. The stormwater system that would serve this plat is proposed to go down an easement on the west side. Sanitary sewer is proposed on the west side to serve this plat. The water main is proposed to be installed within the 35 foot right-of-way,which presumably would serve this plat and adjacent properties within 150 to 300 feet of the hydrants. Theoretically,when the half street is put in,the property to the east could finish those improvements and end up with a street that would comply with the City standards for a residential street. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055 stated that everything Mr. Hanson said is basically correct. Fifty feet wide is the general requirement for a residential street. If the lot to the east is developed,there is the option of asking for the street to be only 42 feet wide. Pavement, sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street lighting would still be required, as well as drainage, and sanitary sewer design. Any utilities within the dedicated right-of-way would be open for the use of the owner of the lot to the east . Mr.Demps asked several questions concerning utilities in the event of possible future development of his property. Ms.Demps asked if there is a plan for a temporary fence. Ms. Higgins stated that the slopes on the southern part of the property are not of concern, but they increase toward the back of the property. Mr.Hanson stated that the civil engineer commented about a possible slope easement on the east side and if it existed it would be on the neighbor's property because it is beyond the line. The easement may not be needed. The reason the engineer added it is because the final street drawings are not completed and there is a slight change in elevation of the street. There are various ways of handling this. There could be a small retaining wall put in, or a slope easement. The engineer believes that since it is called a half street, a slope easement may be more appropriate. If not, it could be constructed without one. A fence is existing on the property; construction of a new fence has not been proposed. Mr. Demps stated that he would like to develop his property in the future and would like to work out the slope issue without the installation of a retaining wall. Jim Hanson - Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16, 2001 Page 4 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Jim Hanson,filed a request for approval of an 11-lot Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the north side of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Avenue NE on the west and Dayton Avenue NE on the east. The subject site is in the northeastern corner of the City. 6. The subject site is approximately 1.78 acres or 77,505 square feet in area. The parcel is generally rectangular. The subject site is approximately 615 feet long(north to south)by approximately 126 feet wide. 7. The subject site has fairly level terrain with a low spot near the center of the subject site. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1822 enacted in March 1960. 9. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses. 11. The subject site contains two residential structures. These structures will be removed. 12. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 11 single family lots. 13. The lots range in size from 4,565 square feet to approximately 8,959 square feet. 14. The plat would be served by a new public cul-de-sac half street. Actually,the new street would be more like two-thirds of a street providing a right-of-way width of 35 feet. It is anticipated that the remainder of the street would be provided when the property immediately east is developed. The owner of that property was at the hearing and did express interest in eventually subdividing although no timeframe for such development was presented. Jim Hanson Jacques 24`" Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 5 15. Proposed Lots 1 to 8 and 11 would front on the new street. Proposed Lots 9 and 10 would be at the extreme north end of the plat and be served by a 20 foot easement through Proposed Lots 8 and 11. 16. Due to the topography of the site,the applicant proposed running the storm water and sewer lines along the western margin of the subject site. Staff and the neighbor to the east expressed concern for providing access to utilities from the east if they are not located in the proposed new street. The water line would be located in the street. 17. The developed site does not contain numerous trees and they probably will be removed to accommodate the division and development of new houses. 18. The Fire Department has approved the cul-de-sac and the half street for emergency access requirements. 19. Development of 11 single family homes will generate approximately 110 vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated that approximately 10% of the traffic trips will occur at each of the morning and evening peak hours. Staff indicated that the roads can support this additional traffic. In addition,the applicant will be paying traffic mitigation fees. 20. The development would add approximately 5 new students to the school system. These students would be spread across the grades of the Renton School District 21. The applicant will have to work with staff and the adjacent property owner to the east to assure appropriate grade transitions between the developed roadway and that parcel's west boundary. 22. Storm water will be detained on the site and released to an in-street system. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat is in an area with adequate urban services. The proposed plat will create additional single family lots. 2. The half-street and half bulb of the cul-de-sac will be wide enough for emergency access and routine access to the lots. It will be appropriately improved as a public street. 3. The applicant will have to achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition is safe and stable. The City, applicant and eastern neighbor should work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities,particularly since this development is nominally predicated on the development of the remaining street by this eastern neighbor. 4. There will be additional noise and population once the development is occupied but none of it will be unusual for a single family community. The roadways have the capacity to handle the traffic that will be generated. 5. The development of the subject site will increase the tax base of the City. 6. The proposed density of 7.86 dwelling units per acre meets the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. This density and lot size is found on other properties in the area including those north and somewhat east of the subject site. Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 6 7. The applicant shall have to create a maintenance agreement for the detention facilities. 8. In conclusion,the proposed preliminary plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions enumerated below. RECOMMENDATION: The Preliminary Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with Mitigation Measures, which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners' Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the city of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. 3. The applicant shall achieve an agreement with the eastern neighbor to assure that any grade transition for the new road is safe and stable. 4. The City, applicant and eastern neighbor shall work to achieve appropriate alignment and location for utilities so that they may be used by the lot east of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 16th day of January,2001. FRED J. KAUF AN HEARING E INER TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of January 2001 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins Keith Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Kayren Kittrick Annette Demps 1055 S Grady Way 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt.Vernon, WA 98274 Jim Hanson Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF January 16,2001 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of January, 2001 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., January 30,2001. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. D5 - 4 T23N R5E W 1/2 ---cpigE)---1.--- •-•-• ,' ! r vi I \ lirg.- -- -F4t:it -703 ••• 1 & ' ,- 1 • _ --i---i-- - i , I I, 1 I . I- - .--Z• -- -1 11 I i . ' g_60_ jc0-ci ' 1p,i jr_Iii I IN 1 *TI_qUOUlp(ip I li_LI I 4 . 1 1 1 I co z -&-1-- 1-q• eplYN NAV 17.--_-:].._PIL::-1,_t"..--1 -- laNi 1411 ] I 1 Nis ----1 - a i cc4,1 • ] ' • [_ A' 1 ---C4) — h/ 1 I N4 11116115; °I !13ia • ___I coi'\ir IV I ;AY jui , 1 a LIM --az — E"•4 I 1- t i */-T1-- — -0-4'1.--F-F ±—, _-: _611.6_ ••,.. • - ce -OD ..5 I se ci) Lim ;. .-... \t\'-, MIL-W -41 2 --- ::': --: ----•• AIM ....2• 'e) LINE --I . r E...,WINI -1 (1) mi orrl. _1 e4 - . 1 I -1 non 7\12 Ce MINI I . • an Vela, I 1 ilim - CI9 pl ___ --1-11fro rt -m -,•• ,•• linniifiRAdl midi T II , --1 - m 1 ---I Iri 1 — 1 II I I .._. z . !:. 3 .::•:.,„ al 1 _LH 1 1 L qN .a4VilA IclIV)/1- t 0 . ,• . nil mai ce - }-1, MI \ aN ` AV ' r l''' octie " i mum: . mmo' 1 1II', -" -1 QC) Ma i€3 .-. MB, prim,.. .9AV iiiii.0.44 „,,, v IR ,, , ' 3 1- IL IN cv \.' I ' . co •P53 'II 411A Ce i. \ , . . 1 1 1 , H 7 ± . • i all 7211: mak 1.• - 1 uiouri . •M• o 1 1 i I 8-is I .1'4 I 1 I:e rIIIIMMIZI EILLtitrai, - I I_ -cl° 1 • .•:,: . % Illo 111 1 I rI NE W. 8! Al - - 0 • 0 1:::..- - ..• 41 — 1 1 =WI MEER • 141'04 sdOoir I. • • ! aN . IAlf' allPrI I I • i • 11-1-1 I ' ! ' ""..---- III' jiLi Frai - liiniii 11 . ! ! II N Ile , . _......... . . , _ I II 1 11111111.111111106C \ \1 lililijilf'' • • °4. ' - (.0 a) .•• Z Z.• ) 7 ZCJ1 -* C.1-a10 No 1.1.Nri ritivf • +1V•III ;Its I 1 1 11 1 e al ��� •*zai 5O2 3169 • I L..., 6D..,I II .- $to $ (2„.. l4) Q� 2222 222 H I�i •In l ll�ryl `^ L. �61,19181' I?020_-84 i s alf 35 1 4�-' pl y I1 as d oo e� 1%; 1 119 h 1 240 237 l4$K�E NYD. LE4.JfoL• , . do Cll .$PA' K ,D.D ° '° as 3 262.3 2/2 .v .•• 6.1.52 252.63 66 - pp uow ® . 1sz.3 14/s /7a.1.f /:a •6M �f•6z P. t , ----or, ---�N, N ! b�4 i b �foz b- JS o! $'" 241 236 , .,A-A 2�23 s 3 i.v. 4 ,4 ., 4'rma / . L A •O u, ..3' :l'7!z1 7Z 10 . 0 d �' y b 4 ° 0011 L 0 1 • � �� (� � � NE_�S1 C In -1 0 _it 322s 2 '�T-n �' q m ' /Ofi2 � /•.3z N I C r='C 1 I'l r . , - is I4;" 1/ 1 C•� I ' 1 zsz3 I 'N T17L3 1 )31 I izs I I 10/.33 CO ,3 60 I L ` f, ;ff4 'K '212, $133 riW• 0 so • �L 1B f0 .� o+ 242 m 2 111-;r' 3 29 - • 23 . 223.' • PAS. .G.1 I . l, �• i I i. , i\._jV I VI,' t_/I.VI) it._jl)/t✓I,VIr. Lw 1.... - I I I . NE 24TH ST. PLAT • •I .0. • E. 1/4 CDR.OF SEC 5-73-3 CRY OF RENTON CLWTA'OE • MONUMENT/369 E!£Y.-JJ257 FEET N4W6E PER PUT OF J.R.GANEF/ADO. 116TH AYE SE. 6a Pa 6s ° 15aa4a' No'JI'oJT E UNE OF TIE NE 1/4 OF SEC 5-23-5 •13261' 1247.67' 5 FOUND CONC.MON IN CASE FOUND LONG.NON IN GCSE NUM DELTA ARC RADIUS CRY CAP w/PUhCN) (9RASS CW w/PUhCN1 , • Cl 5609.01" 56.a1' 56.00' MON ME T/1 CONTROL MONUMENT. I817 CT JJ'JJ 7J' 31.2 1' 55.00' EIEY.�JI7.T7 FEET ALAVOBB • • • CI 48'47'12' 46.83' 55.00' VISITED 4-28-2000 • • °p 6°EN I •-•.j I al • GpRDgri I a ��I wpSTIC��pG. . N° I JD JO• lk lLpNp°° r y0L ' L77 e I \ G,D• fI r�'Gr 223 ,.� Ne9'oTU9 R/" -- , • • . / J0.01 I FOUND CONC.MON IN CASE ' WOOD FENCE IS I EAST UNE OF THE NEST ' C 314 NO•J0'47£ I (BRASS CAP w/PIMCIIJ \`). «ccrr++uu 70 9E KOALA PRE UNE / / £��� ALCESSFD 611.52' NO'JO'47£ / FARCE ON ` • 7 r 9J.7"rB.4T� H0.00' 1 �1 ' , .O,� , 1 ` CAMAS AYE NE. 3 .' '7 1 > GRAVEL DRNEwAY v -,k..� =_' :r R �JJ4J9 6/] m• E'rlcDcrrai x —�rkED 'GI I,i a/w \ x� . '] .° m n ]Q ''\ '2. ae+0• / /� D N�'JO'17 a .RPoR C_i.4S1�R:%!'Y�, I� nw A• DD ig 19.61' SF. Jz41' sa 5a00' ■f so,.,• saw T� • 8 pllr 11\ by Sti z- L Ns' -w— .ao Ls134�] ! �!9 inNOUSE �I t AL PG' —- 56,_J L i — r— f —• N9s' ,i. 1, 4. XOP�n1:: �,4 II E61: l M1 L .ESM7:FOR!TIGRESS N = 6 x 5 © 4 ifta2mW� ' ZL � � I #1 ` A • II I I m �� a eat. L-BFOL L B_$B1.—J as9S L' —BSBL L.._@S/ / • 2 Iiiima ]01�— x WDO9 FENCE ISJ 5 • L--94.TI•- J L _1J5.0.0- ——J —74.r. 5o,.• 5,00' _i,' �•a..0..•`-H 6-% K 62:22 _•.I • LINE LOS AL OF PROP' N0•J047T 615.70' - - _ N • WEST ' MALT 21J I j0.� MVO'ON UNE E OF FENCE TO HE RLACED ]04.01 •NOIC:ALL EXISRNO STRUCTURES ARE TOI `-'• � BE REMOVED TAX PARCELI TAX PARCEL • r0Gr 236 /7250 /0660 I JO'• JO' • LEGEND: I TREE SCHEDULE: I I i PUT OR FOUND MONUMENT AS SHOWN TOTAL TREE COUNT 12 TREES I It I I It . I_09 FOUND 1/4 CORNER MON AS SHOWN • 6'TRUNK DLWE7FR OR ORCAIER • SET 5/8'RADAR AND CAP LS.29537 POINT/ DESC. II SET 2X2 UNE STAKE I ALDER ' 1 MAPLE 24 T.' J ALDER 10' X• TRAVERSE POINT 4 ALDER 6• GRAPHIC.SCALE 5 ALDER 12' E/P EDGE OF PAYMENT 6 ALDER 16' 7 ALDER II' RAY RIGHT-OF-WAY a FIR- 10' ° 2.1 Cr / 9 F7R- I0• ���,,rrrr rr • 10 MA - 10' I I 7yr ��' 6SBL BLOWING SETH4CK LNE 11 MAPLE 1 II' rrorI Pxe- re•• ( INIEET) • leilli.11". 1� FIRE MORN?O SEWER ApN OLE1 inch = 40 ft. if �1q�,F CENTERUN£ , .4_r CONIFEROUS i �:7°•..... LJ IF''�� •1NIL L1157 Q ' O DEGDUOUS 1 LL ep UOUTY POLE �•� -r rrr rr rr.%f�lt • DWI,/ BY DATE JOB NO. EMW APRIL. 2000 JJCON-54.h7X • PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, RSE, W.M. END'BY SCALE so<ET • MLS 1..40• 2 of 2 .:.:•::...:.:::.�:.� i ;{{..i .::::: :::v::•::.� .� .:...:........:..j.::.i':..n.....:....:••:.••:.::yn�:41:::i::::iiiiii:ii$iiii:liiiiiii:i:: :iiiiiiii :iii::�ii:?:i::iiii: ii'. •.i:�:•.:: :ii ::O.� .. :i:.' 1Y: Cii;;i(:;:,i;i::i:::•'.::•'.i::iii::•.iii::<:::��i::::::::i siii:: i::::'::'::,:;::;' i�i:::` +i::i::'}:-:`::i<::i!•:.:.{>i::::: iiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii :ii:iiiiii:i::iiii::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:is iiii::ii:::i::::::i::i:::is iiiiiii:iiiiiiii: iliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiionniii <:D V IT .F::$: V C `'BY IU1��.I;<> N »<? <` <>'WEi.»< ; >saigii >' <«``<< iilin . On the A day of :1 J(r , , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Hearivi kamtKev- Rerol# documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Tet.,04eS 4i&VI, 4r9-r1 p part L nA, VUj Pro per 1-1 re)Le)VW r _ Mt\r'* IVILY a '-' °)I,IVVIA "-', lk V 6. 1i,e,1 I c a T 41 D.P Re,d-orA (V1,s. Act,v1/4 , sit wo-1.c-e-- Ptur-4- 0 -F Pico L I`‘Y'• bou. C-�,r/eQ UU Iv,, \<e:ii behAr s It (Signature of Sender) I,4prA—, fir r t) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) L' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that i 1 Ct i.i_n l n od) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act o the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1 ) ., aoa ► _�t -rya Can r the. ��::, �, ota Public' and fo State of Wash' on 4' MA: ILYN KAMVIOHEFF ►NOTARYARaRt�YBd KAt'�c4iF FF PUBLIC > Notary (Print) OOPHMEN1 riHES:6-2t 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ' My appointment ee i s' �c COMMISSION EXPIRES r 1._ .JUNE 29,2003 Projecf`IIa i ' " n Project Numbero -. ,._,.._ . :. .,.�n�.--.,--:�--,�T NOTARY2.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the DETERMINATION English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal RENTON.WASHINGTON N pp g The Environmental Review Committee newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King has issued a Determination of Non- County. Significance-Mitigated for the following y project under the authority of the Renton The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South Municipal Code. County Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY the subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a PLAT LUA-00-127,PP,ECF Environmental review for proposed NE 24th Preliminary Plat subdivision of property intended for single family homes. Location: 2232 NE 24th Street. as published on: 11/13/00 Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of before 5:00 PM November 27, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together $51.75, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, Legal Nu 2 39 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Leg erk, out ounty Journal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City VON( Hall, on December 12,2000 at AM to Subscribed and sworn before me on this (7 d of ' 2000 consider the proposed preliminary plat. If , the Environmental Determination is !ct rr`P appealed, the appeal will be heard as part `7* ,- fe fei of this public hearing. Interested parties are the public `,``e� .+ . ',', invPublishedited to ein the South County Journal �:A `' el. November 13,2000.8394 Z. Z.'s<i OTApy. ' A-..:--•r. , —19—fig—r--- —o_ tool . ':- pUaL1, = Notary Public of the State of Washington •�";-.••F o•�� residing in Renton �',,';•••:"..2 6 . 2� is'� King County, Washington CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JAN UARY 02, 2001 AGENDA -- COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-075,PP,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposal would subdivide an approximately 1.78 acre parcel into 16 lots intended for construction of single-family residences. The proposed lots range in size from 4,349-sf to 6,880-sf. The subject property is zoned Residential-10 du/ac (R-10)which allows a maximum density of ten (10)dwelling units per acre (du/ac). However, a bonus density of 13 du/ac is allowed if all units are detached single-family dwellings. The proposal has a net density of 10.88 du/ac. The proposed lots front on Edmonds Avenue NE and have pedestrian access from this street. Vehicular access would be provided via a private road connecting to both Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 12th Street. The site is located west and adjacent to Edmonds Avenue NE, between Sunset Boulevard NE and NE 12th Street. PROJECT NAME: JACQUES 24TH STREET PLAT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf.The property is located at 2232 NE 24th Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8)Zone,which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre(du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf(0.38 acre)of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 sf(1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a.Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant).A minor amount of filling will be required during grading for streets and utility construction. The project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. Agnda City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 2, 2001 Project Name: Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Applicant/ Jim Hanson Address: 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Owner/ James Jacques Address: 2509 Aberdeen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 File Number: LUA-00-127, PP, ECF Planner: Elizabeth Higgins Project Summary: The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505 sf (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The property is located on NE 24th Street, between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone. There would be a new public street and cul-de-sac on the property. A modification from street standards has been requested by the applicant to allow half-street pavement width improvement, rather than a full width street. Two existing residential structures and other out-buildings will be removed from the site. The project requires Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat approval and administrative approval of a street modification. Project Location: The project is located on NE 24th Street, between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE in Northeast Renton. i City of Renton P/B/PW Department --- - .:.::urinary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT- - _ _ LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 2 of 13 2y . I ' I _.. ' I LI l e � ` .ST 'L si-kz.z... I ! Lk 41502 9169 9. .v ...• I ••.?)S� I ' _ oN_ $ 8 9�__- (I) (2)-- (4) ..O 222 l + 2Oz22 H: IQ1 4I o_ 69,36 P020-84 I.Z. 5d QQ% l :4 I 1� bIG 240 237 MKE ND LEp. L• ePA'•K D,D ° ?52.3 212 3 _._ a•4 ' 3• - 6138 252.6i 6o 3 % y uoMa ® • 1573 126 5 /26.15' /2f31 •6!2 , 1562 b b A b �y',7',' 13111 ---'F M 6 w oq 55 5 ll. _dTg_ 241 236 223 eeff..1 80 - F. ''. 34, , /OLii` SO •3-. 21/ 12. ws-7-77 N WI r 10 ; I 0 i v Q y e 42g, P Ft I L N c—w--4 I 312.1 •ii Z N 11 G m a p l o ,0132 ems, .•.32 ,�$ {rl , lei ----1 1 , V. ter ,L.3 _____i Y ,_ , "14 ) I1 ral o ); t ~ i LI9I II = i6o2553 , .s. 2 , I 1 76I 24TH Si:- • ' ` Oi _J legIs3 Z 41 M al VGA � 5= t 1. az8 ` so . HEARING EXHIBITS: . Exhibit 1: Project File (no date) containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit 2: Site Plan (4/18/00) Exhibit 3: Sheet 1 of 1; Preliminary Plat (9/12/00) Exhibit 4: Sheet 1 of 2; Cover Sheet (4/00) Exhibit 5: Sheet 2 of 2; Plat Map (4/00) Exhibit 6:Zoning Map (12/20/00) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owners of Record: James Jacques 2509 Aberdeen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 2. Zoning Designation: Residential 8 (R-8) HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,-,. .minary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2, 2001 Page 3 of 13 3. Comprehensive Plan Single Family Residential Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Two single family residential homes 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential, zoned R-8 East: Single family residential, zoned R-8 South: Single family residential, zoned R-8 West: Single family residential, zoned R-8 6. Access: New public street (extended from NE 24th St) 7. Site Area: 77,505 sf (1.78 acre) C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Annexation N/A 1822 03/22/60 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Residential 8 du/ac (R-8) Zone Standards, Development Regulations 4-2-110A 2. Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations, Development Regulations 4-4-060 3. Street Standards, Development Regulations 4-6-060 4. Subdivision Standards, Development Regulations 4-7 5. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations, Development Regulations 4-4-130 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element— Residential Single Family 2. Transportation Element 3. Housing Element 4. Environmental Element HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,;o.,minary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2, 2001 Page 4 of 13 F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505 sf(1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The property is located at 2232 NE 24th Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which allows/requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf(0.38 acre) of the site would be a public street and turnaround. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area would be 61,049.34 sf(1.4 acres), therefore the density would be 7.86 du/a. The 11 lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The average lot size would be 5,549.94. Access would primarily be from a new public street that would intersect with NE 24th Street. The new street would terminate to the north in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to allow development of a half street and half cul-de-sac. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill would be balanced on the site. The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, and administrative approval of half street and half cul-de-sac improvements. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on November 7, 2000, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The appeal period closed on November 27, 2000, with no appeals having been filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee imposed mitigation measures that the applicant is required to comply with prior to recording the final plat. They are as follows: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off- site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. HEXreport.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department i-,,uminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 4 of 13 F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505 sf (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. The property is located at 2232 NE 24th Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which allows/requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf (0.38 acre) of the site would be a public street and turnaround. This area would be deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area would be 61,049.34 sf (1.4 acres), therefore the density would be 7.86 du/a. The 11 lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The average lot size would be 5,549.94. Access would primarily be from a new public street that would intersect with NE 24th Street. The new street would terminate to the north in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to allow development of a half street and half cul-de-sac. Existing structures on the site would be removed. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill would be balanced on the site. The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, and administrative approval of half street and half cul-de-sac improvements. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on November 7, 2000, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The appeal period closed on November 27, 2000, with no appeals having been filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee imposed mitigation measures that the applicant is required to comply with prior to recording the final plat. They are as follows: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off- site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,-,Luminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 5 of 13 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on- site improvements, as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the Sing County Surface Water Manual. The system will require retention of the 100-year storm plus thirty percent (30%)for safety factor. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report, the Departmental Recommendation, and the Advisory Notes to Applicant following the report. HEXreport.doc • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,—,minary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 6 of 13 5. CONSISTENCY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the plat: (a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation: The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Single Family Residential. The Objective and Policies.of Single Family Residential designation are as follows: Objective LU-J: Protect and enhance the Residential Single Family areas, encourage reinvestment and rehabilitation resulting in quality neighborhoods, improve opportunities for better public transportation, and make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The proposed project meets aspects of this objective by a) representing an investment in under-utilized land, b) providing a greater use of urban services and infrastructure, and c) improving opportunities for better public. Policy LU-34: Net development densities should fall within a range of 5.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/a) in Residential Single Family Neighborhoods. The project, as proposed at 11 lots, has a density above the minimum allowed in the zone of 5.0 du/acre and would meet the policy by having a development density of 7.86 dwelling units per net acre. Policy LU-35: A minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet should be allowed in single family residential neighborhoods except when flexible development standards are used for project review. Lots are currently proposed at 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf, with the average lot size at about 5,549.94. Policy LU-37: Maximum height of structures should generally not exceed 2 stories in single family residential neighborhoods. Development standards require that the maximum building height in the R-8 Zone be two stories or 30 feet. The height of buildings will be reviewed at the time building permit applications are submitted. Policy LU-40: New plats developed at higher densities within existing neighborhoods should be designed to incorporate street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes which address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. The development is more dense than existing development to the west and east, but is about the same density as the property to the north and south. Property to the west and east that is less dense has the potential for future subdivision. HEXreport.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department 1-,cnminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 7 of 13 Policy LU-40.2: Site features such as distinctive stands of trees and natural slopes should be retained to enhance neighborhood character and preserve property values where possible. Retention of unique site features should be balanced with the objective of investing in neighborhoods within the overall context of the Vision Statement of[the] Comprehensive Plan. The applicant intends to remove trees where necessary in order to develop the street and utilities. Other trees will be preserved where ever possible. Transportation Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates that increased urban densities would result in fewer, and shorter, vehicle trips. The proposed project would increase urban densities within the City. Housing Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element. By adding 9 lots/houses to an under-developed property, the proposed project would increase the City's housing supply, thereby furthering an objective of the City of Renton. Policy H-4, "Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity," would particularly be met by this project. Environmental Element The proposal should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Element. There are no sensitive areas on the property that fall within the purview of the Critical Areas Ordinance. The project would include a surface water control system that would collect, detain, treat for pollutants, and provide a controlled release of stormwater. A private system would be maintained by a Homeowners' Association or by a maintenance agreement with the City of Renton. Staff recommends that the applicant draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities, etc.). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. Approximately 3 trees, shown on an existing tree inventory submitted by the applicant, would be removed from the property. The individual lots would be landscaped following house construction. (b) Compliance with the underlying zoning designation: The proposal site is designated Residential 8 (R-8), on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The intent of the R-8 Zone is to establish areas for single family residences with the goal of obtaining densities of between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre and to prohibit the development of uses that are incompatible with residential development. The R-8 Zone is permitted in areas of the City designated as Single Family Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development would allow for future construction of up to 11 new single family dwelling units. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,-r,,iminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2, 2001 Page 8 of 13 Minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 sf. The proposed plat would provide 11 lots ranging in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. If developed in the future, the parcels abutting to the west and east would probably have the same density as the proposed project (c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private access easement street per the requirements of the Street Improvement Ordinance (Code Section 4-34). The proposed lot arrangement complies with the Lot Arrangement requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Lot Lines are at right angles to the street line. Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. The lots, as proposed, would meet or exceed the minimum area requirements of the Residential — 8 Zone as indicated in the following: Lot Number Size (sf) Access Configuration 1 5580.06 public street rectangular 2 4565.50 public street rectangular 3 4565.50 public street rectangular 4 4565.50 public street rectangular 5 4565.50 public street rectangular 6 4565.50 public street rectangular 7 6220.14 public street rectangular 8 8959.05 public street rectangular 9 5945.13 public street rectangular 10 5884.70 public street rectangular 11 5632.73 public street rectangular Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights- of-way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. The only lot at the intersection is shown to have a radius of 25 feet. (d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access The proposed project would be accessed by a new public street, built to half-width. The City street grid system would be furthered by the construction of this street, an extension of Camas Avenue NE, into the plat. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department - f-reuminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 9 of 13 Topography The property does not have slopes that are regulated as critical areas in the City. The site will require grading for streets and building pads, however. Approximately 260 cubic feet of cut and fill will be balanced on site. Relationship to Existing Uses The neighborhood of the property has existing residential development of varying densities. The proposed project would be compatible with existing uses. (e) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to conditions of the Environmental Review Committee determination, Code required improvements, and fees. Recreation There is a 3.6 acre, developed City of Renton park, Kennydale Lions Park, located nearby • at the intersection of NE 24th St and Aberdeen Avenue NE. Stormwater The property is located in the Lower Cedar River drainage basin, which drains to Lake Washington. Surface water will be collected by street gutters and catch basins, piped to a detention vault/wet vault, and then discharged via a piped system to the exiting stormwater lines located in NE24th Street. Sewer Sanitary sewer service is available, from the City of Renton, from an existing 12" sanitary sewer main in NE 24th Street. Water The property is within the City of Renton Water District. There is an existing 8"water line located in NE 24th St that will have to be extended onto the property. Street Improvements Frontage improvements would be required along NE 24th Street. These improvements would include curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lights. On site improvements on the new • public street would include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lights, and undergrounding of overhead utilities. Coordination with Metro, the King County public transportation authority, would be required so that a transit stop can be planned, if required. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ereiiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2, 2001 Page 10 of 13 Schools The estimated 5 new students to Renton School District#411 would attend Kennydale Elementary, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen Senior High School. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat, Project File No. LUA00-114, PP, ECF, subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures, which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination. (2) The applicant shall either draft and record a Homeowners'Association or a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common improvements, including private stormwater facilities. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Preliminary Plats (PP) expire five (5) years from final approval (signature) date. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 12"sanitary sewer main in NE 24th St. The engineer should refer to As Built drawing S2162 for more detailed information. 2. A sanitary sewer main extension will be required to be installed by this project to serve the parcel being developed. 3. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of-way, unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the street. 4. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 5. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 6. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 7. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department r-r6iiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT" LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2, 2001 Page 11 of 13 8. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 9. The project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 10. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. 11. Sewer Development Charges of$585.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this project would be$16,380.00. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 12. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no.4362, September 2, 1992). Although the amount will be determined later, it is estimated to be$485 per lot plus interest for the Area charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the Frontage Charge. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an existing 8"asbestos cement watermain in NE 24th St. 2. The proposed plat is located in the 435 water pressure zone. 3. A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full extent of the cul-de-sac)and additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed to serve the plat. 4. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the water main located approximately 7'from face of curb. 5. Fire hydrants will be required to current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. 6. Water System Development charges of$850.00 per new single family residence will be required for this plat(credit given for existing houses). The charge for this plan would be$22,100.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order. 3. The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is shown on the conceptual drainage plan.. 4. The detention/water quality facility must be maintained by the Homeowners'Association. 5. There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. 6. The site appears to lie within the May Creek drainage basin. Due to the sensitivity of this creek system,we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process (see Mitigation Measures). 7. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 8. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 9. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 10. Surface Water System Development charges of$385 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this project would be$10,780.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. HEXreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreriminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 12 of 13 Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 2. The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City of Renton Code states that if the street will require a cul-de-sac,which it does, then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated,with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for all houses beyond 500 feet on dead-end streets. 4. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. Minimum lighting level is 6:1 uniformity ratio and 0.2 foot candle level. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 5. The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of 50 feet). 6. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 55 feet. 7. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat and a 6 foot sidewalk on NE 24th St with a 5 foot planter strip between the curb and sidewalk is required. 8. NE 24th Street, abutting the project, shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving and streetlights. 9. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot,will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that this 28 lot plat(credit would be given for the two existing houses)would result in approximately 248.3 additional average (weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be$18,622.50. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less.than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The temporary fire department turnaround will require curb cut and fire lane identification. HEXreport.doc •City of Renton P/B/PW Department rriiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 2,2001 Page 13 of 13 3. The 28-foot half street will require"No Parking"signs on one side. 4. The structures on Lots 9 and 10 are required to be sprinklered as they are beyond the 500-foot dead end roadway limit. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). 3. Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 8.0 du/a maximum. 4. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4500 sf,with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 6. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are 20 feet for front yards facing NE 24th St(a street existing prior to September 1, 1995)and 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the front if fronting on the new public street to be constructed; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lot 1,which is a corner lot, is shown to front the new street, not NE 24th Street. This must be approved during the Preliminary Plat review. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-8 Zone is 50 percent for lots under 5,000 sf and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. Protection measures for are required for trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 9. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including"Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7)relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree"a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line"as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. HEXreport.doc I • 1/0•1012 A PORTION of the N.E. 1/4, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. icrr-111 li 47. I7-191 '-4 , cZfa sm.. ,i.Ir..III, • „......---,"...). • ,un=_,,,.--. h.,,-v.•;.,..-IT , . = %L.... 41 • 'irl... . - aV QV AM- " -'r"- —-.,, r.' ,;•-.4 4, • ...., I . "..1 ' . ,. SI.. g • ,...' . m I .' : a •,..-- • NE A. , , - • VICINITY MAP 8gili n"707t caarr.WPM CLASS 21.ASFNALS coodeVIE rzi 1 g-a 2^It OOPS 00.114 crus7c0 SWAMIS 70.coLesr , 4.MN.coon 7Wm crown SUOACSO atir CoiaiSr . CIONEL MSS(cuss•40 mAr Iff AMMO MONO SOL 02142OPONS TYPICAL ("Kt-srre_ ROAD C.-1-10/..1 i 1 1 I CAZ9:. .: .., I ;14 1 / / /... • .,4. ••• 10--- ..,. -.j";,.-•• .. ,,, / / N.,y ".... 7. 1_2‘....122_4._ 414- ,..--...••••7: 7.,.mr- ...4 c........, .. "--.., i .1...: kl J •.'/' / '.. ..--------4.'"Eil F 8 al 1 R • ../ / ,--9 -\ 1 7 6 .5\.'"----_,4 'C...71;\----I 2 -.-------1...„. l' 1 .I.fueLK-0, , p ...\.. ...........„ r.....-g..-,...-74. .. . , .-73,- ,rr V.,-. ,>1.0.- ------------- .., I A '' .... A 4 - __,..) t__...4._._____&._.........4-....------•— ,IN ..... • 1 4 :o... 1 —-- r•-=.-!—___-= _ 7---—-- li & I MA 'of 2 _____...--- 1•15,16 '-14 1.100e.IIIPN.awie 1 IC zso s — La 4.55000.macere0T I -a•1 —---- -1 1 1 1 cv o• i E 0S.-a.ING VIASATISrCra CORM WV., VS.-0:cm/small 0 o 0+% . E., de.Tes.10.2,e2.30-/WET/0.h_T a2 11 ,...,....,....,• ,. .„ CP M..Sof S. GOT..1.10.Sea S . WU*un Lays...1. 0s,00TED 0....m14 amsr ef.E. 2005 .. car, 2(.0 W Tit 4 1.1 1 if BMW, 20 S. • pers.-snow voLurne. 0E45 Pr' F0d. 200 FT' A (Nor t0u. Def •00.,.., ..,) •ti ,,,...,Tpcm........v.:..0, rie.....4...0,:t40.7..4....1,00)., II1,03eas I . t ' 1 ta .41 eIr. .,. OR pop .0:1 an ----------------''''T.—I y. 1.1-.cr 2 -4 n .--"'"--- .0.—.0.0.0.— -. 4 — ..... . . .....,...,..1,. 1 1 t --- I 1 r'l PR200900 t G..I.I.C..... .' • 1 . ... _ILITASSL ante i•u Of....4 GRAPHIC SCALE so* 4.co 000 2.00 1.00 .10 20 4.1521 rem Int_ia_ am re__Al._ PROFILE- Ctsl.SITE- ROAD a o rml) sq.ST_AIL- Y..... HoRre e•..• I 1001.0, ft. . .. • . ' • . - • . • . �II'4o VI h'LIV1 IVI LJtIVU KLc,IURU l IV(L. LiVU_ I (I III I I III I I { NE 24TH ST. PLAT • E 1/4 COR.OF SEC.5-23-5 CRY OF RENIVN CONTROL • MONUMENT/369 ELEV.-J3257 FEET NAVOBB PER PUT OF J.R.G4TTEN ADD. • VOL 66,PG.65 116TH AVE. SE 1580.48' No JI of e 4 FOUND CONa MON IN CASE E I/N£OF 7NE NE 7/4 OF SEC. IT47.67 5-23-5 ' 5= n CAP W/PUNCH) FOUND CON',NON IN CASE J I 1 • NUM DELTA ARC RADIUS C OF RENTON CONTROL • (BRASS CAP W/PUNCH) Cl 58'08'07' 55.81' 55.00' MONUMENT/1877 ' • C2 JSJJIJ' 322I' 55.00' ELEV..J1Z22 FEET NAVDBB ' CJ 4,6'47'12' 46.83' 55.00' VISITED 4-28-2000 • ARDfiN of •gDEN i01 ASK• ING NON so ND I JD' J0• Ik • 011,1' AN ADD' ?�Dy 3 / ' 875i• \ R C.D• cP 22 / •5�1 ' N89'O/5 /W 'I� c J0.01'I - FOUND CONC.MON IN CASE WOOD fENCE IS I FAST LINE OF THE WEST,...„ (\ • '14 NO'J017•E ON PROP.LINE� HALF OF TRACT \ /'"� MCI R/BE REPU (BRASS UP W/PUNGV) ESMf.FO E AIW Air _ / �/ ACCESS 6/7.52' NO'J047'F BY FDIC( / �es3 d42� 44ao0 /• A0 CA.ffAS Al�L6' NE \ GRAVEL ORNEWAY — B }o OmI 2 a 1 �o JJu9o08 o THE CITY o w arN X Tyr Iz /W_ • ��rvgg REA1pp �W i a � R 1 5, }v e 1 1 1\ "m. • I 1 /\ n N•'JW47- RPOR �sJ.OT✓12^i2, / Al* eV''' 1.9.61' Lf. 3342' 50. ,„ -7•' ,V Z N55 9400' 0.0t�- 50,.,• 60.00' �' V • LE pA 11 hx 5 I I — L———— W,wA I �► L ITN PA, P .. :1. --_ „G._-J i-— r— r — Q ut OfCK No use �© t 5 X�yQL• n� 0'3O s7 E� - rNsiQ9349'———J A?FOR FIRE I '; I O8\ HOUSE ; 'I _ I 'I ESA?.FOR INGRESS 3• ACCESS 7•, m �, .• 0. 4 ry' I 9(____. g q In E RESS AND URURES .5- ? n m i i 'v m t I z ' W,L p Ziaram^>h -0,2 h 0 p N I� Zj I 2 I 5 2 I © /f I ^ F 10 I _•7 [J / a B J L B$8L 6�d1—J LB55 _ :s: '' a Z ^ti I 2 L_ T L' �SBL L "I 1 • 105�K OF PROP.mycr ` L--94.21•_ J 8 M N 8 4` - v v v 74 3 ,, v v50,°v v v 50,7 v r%-v II 62:X I LINE ., v v .•ORr--/-. ,YOB-: W [�. v NO'JO'47'F 675.70'v -•l • WEST LINE OF FENCE TO BE REPLACED 304 TRACT 223 SDI_-BY,NEW FENCE ON LINE 4 •NOTE.'ALL EXISRNG STRUCTURES ARE TO I —S BF REMOVED TAX PARCEL TAX PARCEL. 236 /1280 ./0B60 , TRACT I • I JO' JO• •I • LEGEND: TREE SCHEDULE: I - PUT OR FOUND MONUMENT AS SHOWN TOTAL IRIS COUNT 12 TREES I • tI I R CO' FOUND 1/4 CORNER MON AS SHOWN 6'TRUNK DIAMETER OR GREATER • • SET 5/8'REBAR AND GIP LS.29537 POINT/ OESC ■ SET 2X2 LINE STAKE I ALDER 48• . 2 ALDPLE 24' 3 ALDER 10' • X TRAVERSE POINT 4 ALDER 8' GRAPHIC-'SCALE 5 ALDER 12' E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT 6 ALDER TB' 7 ALDER 12' R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 8 f7R- 10' o 20 a 9 ' T7R- 10' I i ssss»uussi s ) BSBL BUILDING SETBACK LINE 70 RR- 10' �ipl.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ��� ��I`' 11 MAPLE- 12' D • A FIRE HYDRANT 72 PINEIB' • •‘l O SEWER MANHOLE ( IN FEET) Y 1 CFNIERUNE 1 inch = 40 ft. "4 `,./ ,/ n./ CONIFEROUS dim/Y 4//14444 +• % W CIDUOUS • OVAL LA1M d 0 DE UITLRY POLE ' ..1 ECTE4 6YDIW • \ OJ I} 6/4/2000 • OWN.BY DATE JOB NO. • BMW APRIL. 2000 JJCON-5A.FLX • PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, R5E, W.M. o«o.eY SCALE sir e MLS I=40' 2 OF 2 -sr-vor•..a.uns )eltM.neM.L. ''. �` 127 LC/, , �i, ------- 55 r e e• !( 54 p a r k 368 6 \_ n\IA?�•Ijlll\\, W i! �. it • \ v' "LL I1.c OI w'Y t L34� -/('�(` -t6 3 fig! t�i '_ „B P 1j • ` -?BS I '�'�,,aar : I .7 ° rrr. ��wewwt.r el ," • `� Y _ , Ne I9 c ?�, P ^,:� =� 6 rl'9';o ,,,I,,zr :' 362 • N • 'a- '°s'• f46 51 �n ry c a 5`t L�A9.. M :IS ice'= � � 9YO�'T .z. a A„r rr. a 4 �J a '`, W • W 1 2 ,:, :9P6TRP i RENTON rz4-23-5 50 t<` E!S T.A;E c _ ';l r9 zY l-� ,• i :" i� - - \ \� / ( • •,0 9 a L o p +r^_ L r :i B.c•.axl.a'''' 9 a �„a.�tl -•m-•f -r• •T•-• Pius, ?il-,,-.. ne la-' I 41737 ar 71714,ins l' !77-t ; r ,'tea 2: -•-g-- ..-_-_�" d iZ"n '/ J^•_7r1a ar is eo .' 'IP : IIr_'__- B •'so en->, , M ,, F. a1 M lily_ I ' I Gov't Lot 4 v3 I 'LFW_ <"�s� of m2- I�11' 0 -' 259 '_ •-°�29 = 86� I1C ; i 2210 1 203 �°� ,\ r. i 27 2 ©= I I 35.6 Acres ' II S- t �, .' I , .__ --�----1 ,� i 5, I .r 1 1 i I ; • I _elE „ M 1 leai iz T__t___ 1___L__l� J___L__t [J Peler'on -fir--- I/ 4' / L_-___ 1 6-car , 7.s ei i__ w 2� \ t eP ,i" i� ;.,., I _ i 2 I ''7j ial; d� n I 1 �rrryJz__.ro-+ " e a � It; 1 f�.NE I I I ® I' ., f ��yil I ..• n •2.92 Ac. 3.24 AC. J.61 AL. 1 MCI) c 27•I y^ Ir a 2r Ty 1� �� NIA x �I.rr, Zil Jid 1 l2) ']' S.P LUA-92-IB6 27.I ' ' Z. /Lrt_Y '' x,xaa5•. .• .. I ;1 \ • s , • a. Ill., 4 ,z I.,s l rm I „ m $(11 $ 12)i (41 6❑ 222 ."iz a 222 1i WI 4+•1 1�'1 •.', rP S 1 B�t'�®R� „•``1,� -, 2•rx,- 277 1 rn.l2 • 251` Du„ �'e,l Ro2o-e4 q, °na gQ El.(. 1" \2.I .1-;II `'Z ..m .r •, ,,r „°, I e. I Ivg� tv� - ry �' 276 y 7 x1. :c`.1'"-, =r`3.7xi ° 240 , 237 i1aEKE NYD LEA (=L A. eo rC7� g B a° lrrot+i f ICJ :f� 0 7 f 56 L ti .4), it "'i18 j , 17 " i Y. n, 9 ea .te z �y -�� r •...�`pe x lJ ILaJ3l A�. i 275 1 e"r' t''- ' 2514J= �\•i atPA,K3',DD s �D iT• - 2..1 1 toe e _. i 4A .ones i �� c'e - ,te✓ i.,« s.0 u, .an/Pu m ,' '9e w r� . 3 u Sir iiri 2lr.rl e4 I (1,� ', r l a II ' o 0, 23 ., 22 21 20 •19 ' °• 5(,,,�/6 `C '.2 25�5 m c L a_ .®.. .(.,�I, el in. mg, G° E.V. Weofon yro' a - .-2 : 63- w • --- ------- • q : an La7L0' f92 3] u --- 0 Ide.10 ro.n zcY oiB AC.. 1m ryH+ L/!' I, P„ l w'a S. E r },L_-2_r • 7 1 2 '.5t LIS te6 s f y�� Q €` I.,'.b � «J ]em-Js °��NE.25TH PL a 'e" ..�J a 254217 . �•''2'41 236 �< J Roe ^�� r• - - i ve.v r d ,. 1 W r 2.3 : 1,'� row 11 ^L1o0r�'.SY ' „111r e ��z eae „ 250a nfn Its C kJ'¢ fi frilikI ` .�7.c Z_ -.--------- s �/ s ' FP/$^°_ v" 55$`1�.� 5^ .__ -T4'Z S �!pmm• ! 2 0�9 5I''�, t' 2 +� `�{.n.- I J r0 Ac iU e I ,W •� eB o-• N r_ • i9991 P 4 �-Ir :�e q N.E. Q251Hk ST.;a 1 -.(7 295 s B 3e I� ¢_' t�]r AEI` W c C 1 + i Fc , �]I Et- 2s8:Nt{ 20 Jaleoh Up hn. zr - <., a 4�. i_-1--- �•IM .--�-Q 8-a�) - • Z 11 PI .' a_nl �1 .+ El•ya^ -...Melvin i.Grey xy n ([ y zr A I c11E°I`' (L'F�bl B ~V. y ] Y _ I W Gi°" z�. >, ®ii • 3 is J�N_E_ -�Y - z 3 In. ]03 Pe. 2� •Y L94'[.o nv 2I 0 ^^ RE C,I 06)�c 'Al .el; +`3 « 3e Nt'4J 67 C N °El rl O ^, L.;---I ni•- I• 9 ru •' ( •, ,a..' "•;8 el.. SP t3-,e 2�a -e I/ _W t� 3 • 2�"' C C till in _ ' Uur-,1,,, ` _ I +�, t I�1 ... � Win __ 21L6 J��,V l.,k I 282 Z"2 it S. VIP Z 'C 2 , Ld N •- 1�•1 r� • Z n. ~ L___�_ ^ 'a 2 I„I JAI 14y_ 5y�1/�i6� 7 ,r6 ."I 2 L 5, r�6 r' c,C7�'� wzr jO�, " I 1I`_i' -i, IA' a1 I R I.. r3ry^ - I- 3 y LJ Lam' 'LJ 4J k' (I']�^�f• v LJr Li', ., . �45=1 � s 11, er ra B ay, I Q J I' r� i _ a �Y 5>oV ' 1 e, s� if„' •� ,,,, 1% ) qt 1. QC l e/ COCI ix ( ', III } Be •lr ... i ' s N.E. 24TH . ST.. 5 4 y®5 i °• , ..N.E�... .e 24TH ST. '' 'i 1(y�'T1 (�''7 ((��'.�I - ,III twyrlp� 'yf�� �l�py-Il�i/� ,A., % , 1"; Ida I �' •laifilit 'b.4: '. r - .3.J°.a''at•I!I;� e W.�. ZIS .'1♦ ,11'v;Zli a ki',. C ,ti,1�1 m "lie I s '�,r-I L`3'L I \ 21 y3 �' -c�1' I'['9e F IP_JI _ '14 ci 15"' 16. Ir IT, 16- IS w I4 I] 12 1� 1,67 -�j^�1I1 rt cp III 1. , 1,/ I . 1 IRl 2 41••• x . - I ., I I ,- ` y u �m ` w .. to J 1 I II I"6811 ' 7 so -5^ �^a :f )5 N 33• 32 31 29, 27 2fi riw 2° 23 22 ~21 'a I9 Ir n -;I ' ` PI • �31' r 242 ;, �.`'..1Z' 23 t3,. • _IQ,r �l a caW>yPI,E bA if :-170 E^_R�3Ee, Dn'�`" C„a' " "�Ia p'✓ . N .ti r b-- • '� .- --' 2 / 1 W le_ \. D,h. MO^Net I. a.''I " S n rr,a , r " -----1 e; 1� .`(J Ir uo I IlliQ Q FI Q)`' 1 r-'3 w N.E. I 123RD PL. "'I6r' a..,a-i '% rstl F 'A. ,. • iniglE'I., ��'' ��� T2tw�(A e r.d 'E,2,5N 21 22 \./-,.9;r :? +r] �Q• - G i ;•1 �°0 I, x ..as x z, l' r I' 't e a i` W 2,.. Jy3I 30. 29 y r. : 1 I 2- 3 i 4 i 5 6 - 7 r 9 101 t 5 12 y13 '''s9 1 '1 I5 %, 16 x i J 1----zs-'------ 4:'.-',I;7. Q 111 m r.- - ••V 20 F2I ao ;a .:• 2 4 . '10 fr n- N. _'' Lm ' e' ' • I'2 I • ro; y ,e.. , wn:„. a. 6 r, V �' - • NE 3RD�ST., •- e`- = 9 " 1_2 af}'- �'yrI 1 I 1� ,:1� .- .� ,.., 19 I S dl - g` -^'7� r� LL: 2 " $ `rrr,r ^ a, •I; 1rr ue A S I 220 �_ I� al6i IA1 f,1'0I,�'lE0q;jil_I',Ili I, 1 '. : 0'�94 283 273 I' 262 �. - .1' -4, <„ I2,� i g -r c, ;) L.1 - 5,Pit ar "a I i-_ • e 0J 2.0 F 'Ir' IMI 1 i 9 aT B131e'3lre.a el3 A. Z ' (il nx 01 „ ' $ ^, jLq MI U,¢11 'l�`I131 I'Y3n ,• ' llJ D134 031C:' ,I r-,-L.-1 • N-7B a 11 12 13 h 14 �_ 7 a . '. I I<IT 1- 0.4✓re-- • •.,1----- -� ' I�"v�ioil 9I 1 F le)Ar___ _ SNE. r22ND ST. X _ - ` a I F ,J'3 4 5v4. lP tu-1r I .:r B/_ )e _- * I..0 L•;=lt' � __ ` I'P ^• 4. E IC) - - ^ '+ n r d 11� ^ Y a/' 11 oza Ac ' ".j a em �' -n,m '1I L a:.6�yn. e„s ei�I�='4o x%e'7 so I e fIIFa� .�Tiv6 a 12�R :t®P,.°�, � s r�^f-r i� -� ' n m,,,, -• ,,, -v '� _ts. '6 Z g -v=N.E.------ ?0.1.iazr,-=Si; V!------4 I '8 �I r -R::i �52 2'0 �x 1234 J� o-cm6 s• ^ ZN.« s2.t! f, ! aiAe� III •• �Itw:�fjI •�71 �w r J - V><,><n>< i. Qg 1e7• a, m ' e2 x 1 I A:I !e'49 " . 's a Vicinity Map M__ ;cl .e a• Q • I • n , 065'e •• i • I 0.666c.r • , ' I -- V'' :r RI 2 LJ a r1 'I Qs -I...L,,. ,,., tl:,n.+ I a 1 it I 1 Lys ,ell B dD (J R e.5= O •-A.__ Ian- ' .2:'44' " ._ "t,'I"u I 41""".�_ . - 1 I- 0 N.E. i_ $ - 4 0 • 6'' . 4 2 11 "•- N.E.'°2Y auS7 • p1!••9� _"-r, �-- Ij • a y'J7� f I n ai-I 1;a,2 1 - e z yr ���y4�• jaw 1 vs 1 ' �s LJ. 2I5 T. ^e ate) a 1` SLY- Sua 5 16-L� y,Re_•e«o Sureent •�.a_ x 'LY".• v f,�v t�: Date:May 13,2000- -- '°6 0 ; _ n•r 12' �o� t;); ; r' :� Yn�s { Scale: 1"=200' ° ____I" .ems-' „1 �m r.na, 'm^ I � 'II 6 2 17.S�[ ".,. '1-1. I :.., I !. . '___• -_ • tt7 a CO r le .toL_,_�.._I 3:r _I'4� -r1.�7.,,----fir_-. '-• • - ,I .- lel 1- ice- ...- ...2 ]•N7 2Wxfr4 '..e • 1 D5 - 4 T23N R5E W 1/2 ---( 4fia)--;--- '1" N>.. ,.....• _- 41 ,_. N : ! 1-0.2 ---±-t- 4-1 .- --1 I ------ CO0 ' r: ._- _AF- —.L,-',--- __j , cn c/) 1 I -j 3-1A w _ L.T4- p [. --i___oz ; -. iy ---- , 1.1) g ! . 0 (d)8-21 _ _ID-c, 1 16 1 ;Ni 1 IAN ranv_sppourpRI I i i LI ii. t 1 1 177_,--- /-11 1— ' -7-- -r.- ----1-' 11-11-1 I 1-111-1 - -agFigiATif 1 -• I '1 ' °Ts 1 —14- -cillt N tAv --TtL L I _ . - \ I 1 I * SO ' Tillr IT I I I m 1 eq co! a ' ' , e I A I.II I , . I I " 1 ck •-•' - co CII I_____ '_(-I/3 . .; I LC I I j' 1 I I; irt11° II IIlla 1 1 V •1aa, I --ii-01A I V) ,.': . -I • iy -OD +., I / - - eV - Cfl I III NIVIILII-III- I HIM = II , I CV MI --- , - :-; -_.-7-.t. 0 k itzi,.. •B u `e ., cq c LT4 L -1 1 v) inglijill NEN 1LT 2 ... - . . .. r,-i UI" IT willIMI -an buli% III 01 I i&MN Pa --_z: -- - I I 1 il 1-1 1 .._ z . EH-., $_3,3. __-_1 II 1 1 1 . 1 I AN. •aiiiit ti431010/1/L 11 I . .. I i M ' I 11 I 1 I 1 NA ce . 1--1 1 i 1 i 1 ;/ r MI 1 • a - pn __.' IBM 1 1 -63' - 1 col MIIF1 i _ --- I 1 -C4 Mill ef1 - ' • •-• IIIII ' \ ligIN "aAV INEWINill \ 111E111 I I t. -4-='' ____ I 1 1 . . a 1 :9 .B17.4Vi. . ,L;, in piOluok • s(u \:.- 'eta- 1.: .i . 1 il \ NM . —1 fi • .\ 1 • 44 au IY AS 1.1 i liTiouri Mill.21 co P •4• 1 1 1 .. 1 Dvaimil 870 1 1 i 4_1 L iT I III 1 0 iy \ Wm a V 61) J.Lla. 1.101 .,,, I ' --,. ::-• - \,-- ' -- , • ... 4:.. .... 1 —1- I1 I il Min T18, 1 It Ai . • .' . 1 • hit' __Ilmi -bo gd10 'r 7. .• I • ' , 1 1 II ' I: I RN l'aAV a"flpft I 1 . 1 ILI; 1 ' I ! , : . • 0 A \ 1 1 ilL1 • 1 a- 1 1 7 --11-1 11 r-iirliiii ! 111 ' 1 N a.-, , _ . . 1 r ' • • 01.,15„ , , , , „ _ 1111 i ME ,----AMININIMIIIIM1114.1111 k t• if 1 lo+ • - .J (..°41) 4" Z Z"' S ) 7 Z Ca 7 el.Zi 0 N 0 LI NV's/Ca IN1 IN1 V tONING MAP BAK r10- C^ 3EN - '.I� .r . , _„C_!66-^.„ o oil"1 <qp.„,' emu'-i Ir - - = - ' _ .. i - ,�__ s1 4 v59a. }r f .!] w r ,,!: ', . ::,,,i‘f 6 _. , 'jr - '!r k�'L II Fir r _ I ` 4�;I�� .i� I° ..: ,ti, -:. , nil; ��` '1.11Alt/14 +:`}:: .,+ `,,I fi- 4e1� Y :i /rp, io ./:._:: �,�ii rail �I $!24�- Rfa R ;,n 26T24NIR5E All. - din.:-;::-..-;_-;:-.;:;:: eW �' J.1yI :a► i if...,7 i±_, 1 , '464Nt r:•!EgiM W fiT::!::..: :_iiiEK::., )f.1.11.;.4-;:rim.-1,ifr ri, ,,,,,1rill - lz iii...:-.;,- ::,;,-...i-a-:,-:::ik_frE;g9::-.::,'Kzififir:;fi:E:"::: '::E:ii3:.:-:.--:ig:&AM.!iltrA,N\ ., ' , In ' 11\,a :'_ .. :.: . ............\I 7� �I I i�.\ ;a, Lam. c. F+7y-. a • �I',. R .T24N R5E • ! JFi! . !i ille< i�F _ A I -141�� Br \�.. ,Y�1R� 1►I.a, � I IF. ��,R5� ;� 2T23N R� 1 r J 1 • :��A� �. I�i(� �r�•;� �r����. �j! ��! 1 + AE� iE `4 P�*1 i'771.t• i I�. .ar _ y �i I I i I I.IL1 �I I IJi ��,Fyy_�� 1 �� R Ii:, �'', cl,, 'I6E \l i �:A-.4,2.�-E, st.t N 7 `.„, It R5E 1 7"� �T17 ri � � i } • �pl[P ' III p•.�'llr`� i '� I ..a •��:� 'fin= 2611! Tr y`� L•.1111 it ='3fo ® ili il Ir 111 �''' ....0., ...., �\ 1 ` 111. y^ram " y 1 °t 411k [• lS1llY` \"Ir 1.'•�''•E / ` t PII'!I' I.i(.,IjtP�It - l :,.' Q` _ 1 ,, B 23 ; 11.r1r`.11tli'.L.ti { lrt E [� • ;T f 4 \ti 1 �'•3 !5 �� ' -i.-., �r, i''I 371 81, -wirmlfia °.4i r \yam „ , ,,,,,,.,:.*:____-_ Al.,41,0-A' :::,,., - .. -. - . iliv T2 N R4 ,. �—' N 1 -I1: I , <o a4�,: I& l r16'&S111 'rei ,�-. �s 2 T23N R5 23 T23N R5E J ��� ,yr,, •U •UGC .��'`.:I'gyp'• y:. -'' e lt,•„; , .1 _..1 1 1 fir gr4.1 'f '•: .t if! ..I j, j! 41- , INR4EI- /;23 R4E l � '^F ���iI Flo:}I / x 1 ° If J�23 J►' r_ � __ 5E r.j ^� .z° o•r ��1 I INI -` 511 , C_ r.O -=�� rj l;•; 4. 825, • - ". r. 3' r38 1�3N R" .. I" i- b', I ' r r I�Tr e 1 T2• • §E. ' 5° j'3N R k_.a' - 5E 35 T23N- 3; r +'1 611' a 60: I '� 3•011 61 e,; ` `� : Icr' • 833 • �'t , ? - j V-n::::i::i::ii?. ..q, _ iii, ,, lip I • ........... 22N R4E I. - FI ,A� ' �. .1 : '— ;!WA N iit-4.-c5 '..Y.::::, " 1 6T2 5� E R _, 'H 2 T22N R5E . 1. KROLL "~ (P) Public] Owned n Convenience Commercial 1-7 Resource ConservationY R-1 I Residential 1 du/ac n Center Neighborhood• Renton City Limits I I',� t"`',Tl I R-5 I Residential 5 du/ac 1--I CenterSuburban• "-'-'- Adjacent City Limits '1 I-7 Center Downtown* (Grey Text) Prezonea IR-B I Residential B du/ac SECT/TOWN/RANGE IRMH I Residential Manufactured Homes I COR I Center Office Residential SS Automall District A I R-la I Residential 10 du/ao I—I Commercial Arterial I•;•;•;I Automall District B Y IR-14I Residential 14 du/ac I CO Commercial Office • For additional regulations In overlay districts not shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. i . 3 IRH-II Residential Multi-Family Infill IT Industrial - Heavy o ' a es-NI Residential Multi-FamilyNeighborhood Center IH Industrial - Medium f r e 0 PAGE 1 EMIResidential Multi-Family Suburban Center IL Industrial - Light INDEX ` . N MN Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* I—I Public Use r O 7,. Y ;;� CITY F-RENTON. Plannin /Buildin /Public Works Department " , n►s Jesse Tanner,Mayor. : : ' .' .,.• .. Gregg Zim P.E.,Admi tr merman ator. November 29, 2000 .. : • Mr.Jim Hanson.. • .17446'Mallard Love Lane - - Mt.Vernon; WA 98274 SUBJECT: Jacques 24'"Street Plat: :_- ,"..:,-.�... Project No: LUA-00-127,PP;ECF„ :,,, Dear Mr. Hanson: , • • This letter is to'inform you that the appeal periodhas.ended for the Environmental Review Committee's : : (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance-;Mitigated for the above-referenced project., No appeals were filed on the ERC determination: The'applicant 'must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. . • t _ A Public Hearing will be held by the:Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh ro . floor.consider the,of City Hall, 1055 South 'Grady Way,proposed PreliminaryRenton, Washington,:on January. 02, 2001 at 9:00 AM to p p Plat,": applicant or representatives)of the applicant is required to. 2. be present at the public.hearing .A copy of the staff.report will be.mailed to you one week before the hearing. : - If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7382. " For the Environmental Review Committee Elizabeth Higgins,AICP., - . • Senior Planner Jacques/Owner Mr, &Mrs.:Dennis Mitchell Ms Mary Wolfe/Parties of Record FINAL ... . . - 1055.South Grady Way Renton,,Washington 98055 _;.: : ;o< CITY , RENTON ..tL ,; Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 17, 2000 Owner Applicant Parties of Record Re: Jacques 24th.Street Preliminary Plat,LUA-00-127,.ECF, PP " This letter is sent to inform you that the public hearing for,of the above-referenced project has been rescheduled at the request of the City,of Renton Hearing Examiner. The hearing is now'scheduled for Tuesday,January 2,2001, at 9:00 am. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers,7th floor of Renton City Hall. If you plan to attend the public hearing,please call 425-430-7282 prior to the hearing to verify that it is still.scheduled for this time. In addition, several errors Were found in the Environmental Determination, Mitigation Measures,;and Advisory Notes to Applicant. Included herewith are the corrected. • Environmental Determination, Mitigation Measures, and Advisory Notes to Applicant. I apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused the Owner, Applicant, or Parties of Record. _ If you have questions'about the project or other questions about the public hearing,please call me at 425-430-7382.. Thank you. Sincerely. " Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner • Copy: file -1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 SF (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 SF to 8,959 SF. The property is located at 2232 NE 24t Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 SF (0.38 acre) of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 SF (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24'h Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of a rcduccd public street right-cif-way (from 50 to 12 foet wido}half street improvements and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. MITIGATION MEASURE: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence.The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 8. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the Sing King County Surface Water Design Manual. The system will require retention of the 100-year storm plus thirty percent (30%) for safety factor. . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The property is located at 2232 NE 24 Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf (0.38 acre) of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34, sf (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of a roducod public stroot right of way (from 50 to 12 feet-wide}half-street improvements and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24t Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 12" sanitary sewer main in NE 24th St. The engineer should refer to As Built drawing S2162 for more detailed information. 2. A sanitary sewer main extension will be required to be installed by this project to serve the parcel being developed. 3. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of-way, unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the street. 4. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 5. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 6. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 7. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 8. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 9. The project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 10. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock; ,.ulkheadJacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Hat LUA 99 049,SV,ECF,SMELUA-00-127, PP, ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page2of4 11. Sewer Development Charges of$585.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The 1 fee for this project would be$400$6,435.00. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 12. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, 1992). Although the amount will be determined later, it is estimated to be $485 per lot plus interest for the Area charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the Frontage Charge. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an existing 8"asbestos cement watermain in NE 24th St. 2. The proposed plat is located in the 435 water pressure zone. 3. A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full extent of the cul-de-sac) and additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed to serve the plat. 4. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the water main located approximately 7'from face of curb. 5. Fire hydrants will be required to current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. 6. Water System Development charges of $850.00 per new single family residence will be required for this plat (credit given for existing houses). The charge for this plan would be $22,100.00$7,650.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 7. The site is within Aquifer Protection Zone 2. Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order. 3. The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is shown on the conceptual drainage plan.. 4. The detention/water quality facility must be maintained by the Homeowners'Association. 5. There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. 6. The site appears to lie within the May Creek drainage basin. Due to the sensitivity of this creek system, we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process (see Mitigation Measures). 7. Drawings submitted to.the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 46,8_Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 4--7,9_The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 4810. Surface Water System Development charges of $385 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this project would be advisorvnotes(revised).docadviseryaetes.des • Andorson/Baker Residential Dock '.:;ulkheadJacques NE 24th Street Prelim ina ry Nlat LUA-99-019,SV,ECF,SMELUA-00-127, PP, ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 4 $14 0.0O$4,235.00. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 2. The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City of Renton Code states that if the street will require a cul-de-sac,which it does, then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated,with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for all houses beyond 500 feet on dead-end streets. 4. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. Minimum lighting level is 6:1 uniformity ratio and 0.2 foot candle level. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 5. The applicant has requested half street improvements be made by applicant. 6. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 55 feet. 7. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat and a 6 foot sidewalk on NE 24th St with a 5 foot planter strip between the curb and sidewalk is required. 8. NE 24th Street, abutting the project, shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving and streetlights. 9. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot, will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that this 28-11 lot plat(credit would be given for the two existing houses)would result in approximately 218.385.95 additional average (weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be $18,622.5 0$6,446.25. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Building Department Review advisorvnotes(reviseadocadviseryaetes.ec Andercon/Baker Residential Dock-.;ulkheadJacques NE 24th Street Preliminary'Plat LUA 99 019,SV,ECF,SMELUA-00-127, PP, ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 4 of 4 1. Demolition permits will be required. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The temporary fire department turnaround will require curb cut and fire lane identification. 3. The 28-foot half street will require"No Parking"signs on one side. 4. The structures on Lots 9 and 10 are required to be sprinklered as they are beyond the 500-foot dead end roadway limit. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). 3. Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 8.0 du/a maximum. 4. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4500 sf, with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 6. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are 20 feet for front yards facing NE 24th St (a street existing prior to September 1, 1995) and 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the front if fronting on the new public street to be constructed; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lot 1, which is a corner lot, is shown to front the new street, not NE 24t Street. This must be approved during the Preliminary Plat review. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-8 Zone is 50 percent for lots under 5,000 sf and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. Protection measures for are required for trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 47,9_Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including "Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7) relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of "tree" a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line" as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. 1-8710. The applicant shall draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights- of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. advisorvnotes(revised).docadvisePynetes:des CITY of RENTON l -, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E:,Administrator ... November 9,2000 = • • Washington'State • , • Department.of Ecology :' Environmental Review Section _ PO Box 47703 ,:_ Olympia,WA 98504-7703 'Subject: 'Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on November 7,2000: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED JACQUES 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY'.PLAT... LUA-.00-127,PP,ECF Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting,has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 SF (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 SF to 8,959 SF.. The property is located at 2232 NE 24th Street, in a Residential 8 (R---8)Zone,which requires between 5.0 and • .8.0 dwelling units per net acre.(du/a). Approximately-16,455.82 SF (0:38-acre)of the site would be a public right- of-way and:therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site - area is 61;049.34 SF (1.4 acre), therefore the density is;7.86 du/a:Access would be from a new public street from. . NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce.the width,of the public right-of-way from 50 feetto 42 feet. .The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, •Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval'Of a reduced public street:right-of-way(from 50 to 42 feet wide) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. Location: 2232 NE 24th Street Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00PM November 27, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00.application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton;WA 98055. Appeals to"the Examiner are governed by.City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)- , 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7382. :"' For the Environmental Review Committee, = /iz ; J Elizabeth Higgins;AICP. ..:. `. . .;:: Senior Planner• cc ; King County Wastewater:Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries: , DavidF.:Dietzman,Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region ; Duwamish Tribal Office : ;., Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) ' US Army'Corp.:of Engineers ;' AgencyL�tter\ .: -_ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - T - • opinR�Thic nannr rnntains 50%recycled material.20%oast consumer • . c: - CITY :1_ . FRENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 9, 2000 • Mr.Jim Hanson - • 17446 Mallard Love-Lane _ • Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 = SUBJECT: 'Jacques 24th Street Plat Project No. LUA-00-127,PP,ECF • Dear Mr. Hanson: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental•Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have :completed their review of the subject project: The:ERC, on November 7, 2000, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document.. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27, 2000. Appeals must he;filed'in'Writing together with the required $75.00,application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton; 1055 South Grady.Way,,:Renton,. WA,98055. ;Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1.10: Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton.City Clerk's Office '(425)-430-6510; A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing ,Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of.City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on December 12,2000 at.9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat.• The applicant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing,.:A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if ou choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, // theA= o Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Cc:. Mr.J. Jacques/Owner Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Mitchell, Ms. Mary Wolfe/Parties of Record Enclosure rinsmitr 1055 South Grady Way-.R enton,Washington 98055 eZ%-rhic nanwr'rnnfinc cn/rwry'I d mafwrial vn%nncf rnnm imwr • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF-NON-SIGNIFICANCE: (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES •APPLICATION NO(S): I LUA-00-127,PP,ECF • APPLICANT: Jim Hanson • - PROJECT NAME: Jacques.NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL :. Jim Hanson,:of:Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an '(iapproXimately 77,505.16'SF (1 J8`acre) property into 11•:lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 SF to 8,959 SF. The property is located at 2232 NE 24t Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8)Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 SF (0.38 acre) of the:site would be:a public right-of-way and:therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 SF (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street... This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac: A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 •feet to 42 feet.,The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval,,administrative approval of-ar-eeltteecl • ) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Vr ,,, Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater.than 8 percent. - - I CATION OF PROPOSAL: The_project`is locatedat`2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24.. Street between,Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE: MITIGATION MEASURE: : 1 The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before`clearing,and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County.Surface Water Design;Manual (KCSWDM).. This will be required during the construction of both off-site`and on-site improvements was well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed:to intercept surface'water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation_growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending,on,site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates: The.design;and":construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recentKCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will"be required during the construction of.both off-site and on-site improvements,as well as building construction::,." 3. The project contractor shall perform daily:reyiew and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both Off-:site and on-site improvements,-as well as building construction. . • 4. . Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change. or revision to maintenance schedules:or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the-civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat:„ " • 5. . The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75:00 per each'new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new. residence.The Transportation Mitigation Feeds due prior to the recording of the plat. 6.'. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate.of $488.00 per each new single family residential lot created,by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat: . • 7: The"applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot.: The fee is dueprior to the recording of the plat. . I.l irl�- 8. The:water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the Sing County : Surface Water'Manual. The system will require retention of the 100-year storm plus thirty percent (30%)for - -safety factor.: . ' "Al' IA • CITY OF RENTON .:: • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ..:'. . • ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): . " LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson • - PROJECT.NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat • • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson,of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf(1.78'acre)property into.11_lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would•range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The'property:is located at 2232 NE 24 Street, in a- Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which::requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). `Approximately 16,455.82 sf(0.38 acre)of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage Of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 sf (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from.a new public street from NE 24th Street. '. . : This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. "A modification from.street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet'to 42 feet., The applicant will be responsible for. half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project.requires Environmental Review, • Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of a reduced_ public,street right-of-way (from 50 to 42 feet wide) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located 42232 NE24t"Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24 Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and. Edmonds-Ave NE. y` .. Advisory Notes to Applicant: ' The following notes are supplemental information provided in',conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided.as information only,.they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. ':; `' Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer . " " 1. There is an existing 12" sanitary sewer"main in NE '24h St,.The;engineer should refer to As Built drawing S2162 for more detailed information. • 2. A sanitary sewer main extension will,be required to• "be installed by this project to serve the parcel being developed.• ' 3. .The conceptual utility plan needs to'be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of-way,:Unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the street. 4:" A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 5. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers): Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 6. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards.. 7. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. • 8., The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. : 9.. The project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2." • 10. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. .There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. -. • _ • Anders° Bak r Residential Dock&Bulkhead LUA-99-0 ; V,ECF,SME•` Advisory N s (continued) Page 2 of 11. Sewer Development Charges of$585.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this project would be $ •,' :•.•1. There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the instruction permit for the preliminary plat 12. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton"Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City.•of. Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, .1992). Although the amount.will be determined later, it is estimated to be $485 per-lot plus interest for the Area charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the.Frontage Charge. = - Plan Review-Water • 1. There is an existing 8"asbestos cement watermain in NE 24th St. 2. The proposed plat is located in the 435 water pressure zone. 3. A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full,extent of the cul-de-sac) and additional fire hydrants will be,required to be installed to serve the plat. 4. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the water main located approximately 7'from face of curb. • 5. Fire hydrants will be required to:current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. 6. Water,System Development:charges of$850.00 per new single;family residence will be required for this:plat'(credit given for-existing houses). The charge for this plan would be 9-22 fOO:Ut This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction:permit for the preliminary plat. - "$7,&so • ? Th hi'rc, ih fir;OrP C�d rv► rj?�e: 2•. Plan Review—Stormwater;Drainage 1. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of.Renton: 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order.; 3. The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is`shown on the conceptual drainage plan.. 4. The detention/water quality facility must be maintained by the Homeowners'Association. • 5. There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. 6. The site appears to lie within the May Creek:drainage basin.' Due to the sensitivity of this creek, system, we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process(see. Mitigation Measures). 7. 'Drawings`submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets.: 8. Before any construction or development activity.occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with - the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 9. The City of Renton retains the right to"restrict the timing of land clearing.and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be,necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. - 10. Surface Water System Development charges of$385 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this project would be $10 70:SO- 0 This • fee must be paid prior-to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. ' 4-:235.,:cn advisorynotes • 1111 I1lc13 • Anderson k Residential Dock& Bulkhead - - LUA-99-049, ,ECF,SME Advisory Not s ontinued) : - • _ Page3of4 _ Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements . • 1. -All electrical and'communication facilities.to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. - 2. The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five • feet with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City-of Renton Code states that :__if the street will require a cul-de-sac,which it does,then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated,with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround: The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. 3. . Fire sprinklers are required for all houses beyond 500 feet on dead-end streets. " 4. Street lighting is required to meet City standards: Minimum lighting level is 6:1 uniformity ratio and 0.2 . foot.candle level. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. • 5 T m right f. idth is 42 feet/modified fr ofroot ctondord. idah of 50 fool)• - 6. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius.of:45 feet and right-of-way radius of 55 feet. 7. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is,required inside the plat and a 6 foot sidewalk on NE 24t St with a 5 foot planter strip between.the curb and sidewalk is required. : - - 8. NE 24th Street, abutting the project,shall be improved with curb,,;gutter, sidewalks,.paving and streetlights. 9. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot,=will be required prior to recording of the plat It has been estimated that this lot plat(credit would be given for the two existing houses)would result in approximately 2 g5,15- addit onal average(weekday)trips.:The Transportation Mitigation.Fee would be$-10,G22.G0. II ,4•4-!0 .25 Plan Review—General 1. All required utility,drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. - 2. The construction permit application(s)must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the • estimated construction costs; 4,percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 -. percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat irriprovements),and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Building Department Review _ . 1. Demolition permits will be required. . • advisorynotes - It I17ii?) Anderson/Baker Residential Dock dt Bulkhead LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME • • Advisory Notes (continued) Page 4of4:. • Fire Prevention Department.Review 1: A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area,-the minimum fire flow.increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. .The temporary fire department turnaround will require curb cut and fire lane identification. 3..:.The 28-foot half street will require"No Parking"signs on one side: 4. The structures on Lots 9 and 10 are required to be sprinklered as they are beyond the 500-foot dead - end roadway limit. Property Services Department Review " ' • 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8).. 3. Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 8.0 du/a maximum. a' 4. Minimum lot size in the;•R-8 Zone is 4500 sf, with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for . corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet: Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories,or 30 feet. :' 6. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are 20 feet for front yards:facing,NE 24th St (a street existing prior- to September 1, 1995)and 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for:attached garages which access from the. front if fronting on the new public street to be constructed; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15.feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lot 1, which is a corner lot, is shown to front the new street, not NE 24t Street. This.must be approved during .the Preliminary Plat review. Setback dimensions should be shown.,on the - construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. • ' 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-8 Zone is 50 percent for lots under 5,000 sf and 35 percent . or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. Protection measures:for are required for trees located on abutting properties within_20 feet of the. property line:'; • • 9. Performance .Standards for Land Development Permits: (RMC 4-4-130K); including ."Protection` Measures During Construction (RMC 4-4-130K7) relating to trees,'shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree" a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line" as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. • 10. The applicant shall draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners'.. :Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights- of-way, and storrnwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. . • advisorynotes _ _ . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PALT LUA-00-127,PP,ECF Environmental review for proposed subdivision of property intended for single family homes. Location: 2232 NE 24th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on December 12, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed preliminary plat. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: November 13,2000 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot CITY OF RENTON ` DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf(1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The property is located at 2232 NE 24 Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf(0.38 acre) of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 sf(1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24t Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, ' ) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. IMF'vi twig✓b vuoce.,tr LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Thg project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24 Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 13,2000 DATE OF DECISION: November 07, 2000 SIGNATURES: fOfk 11(414/1tCp / /- -7 • 00 t. -S Zi r an,Administrator DATE vuepartment of Planning/Building/Public Works • im Sheph d, Administrator V Community rvices L e W e el r, Fi DATE Rent ire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 SF (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached, sLngle family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 SF to 8,959 SF. The property is located at 2232 NE 24t Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8)Zone,which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 SF (0.38 acre)of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 SF (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of ed and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. of eet iw�r►'vve.,',..4s LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24 h Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. MITIGATION MEASURE: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. - ►may 8. The water qu,ity treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the County Surface Water Manual. The system will require retention of the 100-year storm plus thirty percent (30%) for safety factor. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Jacques NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached, single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf. The property is located at 2232 NE 24 Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf(0.38 acre)of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 sf (1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval, administrative approval of ' - - eet-wI ) and, if necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. 114.4 f 4frteg- Kv,rec .&s.fk LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located 4.2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24 Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 12" sanitary sewer main in NE 24th St. The engineer should refer to As Built drawing S2162 for more detailed information. 2. A sanitary sewer main extension will be required to be installed by this project to serve the parcel being developed. 3. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of-way, unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the street. 4. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 5. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 6. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 7. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 8. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 9. The project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 10. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. • -Anderson/Baker Residential Dock«Bulkhead L UA-99-049,SV,EC F,S M E Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 4 11. Sewer Development Charges of$585.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this project would be89:8®.' There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. ¢3S.o0 12. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, 1992). Although the amount will be determined later, it is estimated to be $485 per lot plus interest for the Area charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the Frontage Charge. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an existing 8"asbestos cement watermain in NE 24th St. 2. The proposed plat is located in the 435 water pressure zone. 3. A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full extent of the cul-de-sac) and additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed to serve the plat. 4. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the water main located approximately 7'from face of curb. 5. Fire hydrants will be required to current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. 6. Water System Development charges of $850.00 per new single family residence will be required for this plat (credit given for existing houses). The charge for this plan would be $ 8? This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. ID 7, 50.4,0 -7. T► .S(1 t w��-c.�.� ��-�.i v Pro -;n•, Arc. 2. Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order. 3. The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is shown on the conceptual drainage plan.. 4. The detention/water quality facility must be maintained by the Homeowners'Association. 5. There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. 6. The site appears to lie within the May Creek drainage basin. Due to the sensitivity of this creek system, we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process (see Mitigation Measures). 7. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 8. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 9. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 10. Surface Water System Development charges of$385 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this project would be $1.6 8O 6O'. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. , , 23 vz5- advisorynotes -Anderson/Baker Residential Dock aCdulkhead LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SM E Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 4 Plan Review—Transportation and Street Improvements 1. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 2. The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City of Renton Code states that if the street will require a cul-de-sac,which it does,then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated,with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for all houses beyond 500 feet on dead-end streets. 4. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. Minimum lighting level is 6:1 uniformity ratio and 0.2 foot candle level. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 5. The minimum right-of-way width is 42 feet(modified from street standard width of 50 feet). 6. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 55 feet. 7. A 5 fOot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat and a 6 foot sidewalk on NE 24th St with a 5 foot planter strip between the curb and sidewalk is required. 8. NE 24th Street, abutting the project, shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving and streetlights. 9. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot,will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that l is lot plat(credit would be given for the two existing houses)would result in approximately 2 e55.9 5' additional average(weekday)trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would b . Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s) must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over$200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. advisorynotes •Anderson/Baker Residential Dock ix Bulkhead LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SM E Advisory Notes (continued) Page 4 of 4 Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The temporary fire department turnaround will require curb cut and fire lane identification. 3. The 28-foot half street will require"No Parking"signs on one side. 4. The structures on Lots 9 and 10 are required to be sprinklered as they are beyond the 500-foot dead end roadway limit. Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). 3. Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) minimum and 8.0 du/a maximum. 4. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4500 sf, with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 6. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are 20 feet for front yards facing NE 24th St (a street existing prior to September 1, 1995)and 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the front if fronting on the new public street to be constructed; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lot 1, which is a corner lot, is shown to front the new street, not NE 24t Street. This must be approved during the Preliminary Plat review. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-8 Zone is 50 percent for lots under 5,000 sf and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. Protection measures for are required for trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 9. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including "Protection Measures During Construction" (RMC 4-4-130K7) relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree" a found in RMC 4-11-200, "drip line" as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. 10. The applicant shall draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners' Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights- of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. advisorynotes -0 • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION JACQUES 24TM STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-00-127,PP,ECF Jim Hanson,of Hanson Consulting,has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 SF(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots suitable for detached,single family houses. Lots would range In size from 4,565 SF to 8,959 SF.The property is located at 2232 NE 24"Street,In a Residential 8(R-8)Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre(du/a).Approximately 16,455.82 SF (0.38 acre)of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore Is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations.The net site area is 61,049.34 SF(1.4 acre),therefore the density is 7.86 du/a.Access would be from a new public street from NE 24"Street.This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac.A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet.The applicant will be responsible for half- street improvements(see Advisory Notes to Applicant).The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval,administrative approval of a reduced public street right-of-way(from 50 to 42 feet wide)and,if necessary following construction design,Board of Public Works approval for driveways sloped greater than 8 percent Location:2232 NE 24"Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27,2000. Appeals must bo filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application tee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner aro governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430.6510. A Public Hearing will bo held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on December 12,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant Is required to he present at the public hearing.If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. `��(eip;, 2 ii0®% fi// � i 1.1 • me�'ii•,�I1 237 V• IM,NT° J� ' IA qt�' ©+f o ,}mo�o , FR> • zarx , sr. I m �w33[�!;ZIO N r;�2 ,>EwaaY W; �`ilkaW y-.N.E 23nD �+rlk;b Trlf S y fir_'R n ry . NE 3R0 or I .*ri AFS' 6Tei • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7382. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, d rep �� r r,J , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . ND v �, boa • Signed: af,tte - �. ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for e State of Washington residing` aei(>- -) , on the y day of Oo MARILYN KAIACHEFF STATE CIF W/SHINGT O>N COMIVIi,SSION EXPiRES JUNE 29, 2003 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 • • STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: November 7, 2000 Project Name: Jacques' NE 24th Street Preliminary Plat Applicant: Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon,WA 98274 File Number: LUA00-127, PP, ECF Reviewing Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Project Description: Jim Hanson, of Hanson Consulting, has proposed subdivision of an approximately 77,505.16 sf (1.78 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached,single family houses. Lots would range in size from 4,565 sf to 8,959 sf . The property is located at 2232 NE 24th Street, in a Residential 8 (R-8) Zone, which requires between 5.0 and 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Approximately 16,455.82 sf (0.38 acre) of the site would be a public right-of-way and therefore is deducted from the gross square footage of the site for density calculations. The net site area is 61,049.34 sf(1.4 acre), therefore the density is 7.86 du/a. Access would be from a new public street from NE 24th Street. This new street would terminate in a cul-de-sac. A modification from street standards has been requested to reduce the width of the public right-of-way from 50 feet to 42 feet. The applicant will - be responsible for half-street improvements (see Advisory Notes to Applicant). Existing structures on the site,two houses and carports, would be removed. A minor amount of filling will be required during grading for streets and utility construction. The project requires Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval,admiftietrativc - - eet wide) and, if lA necessary following construction design, Board of Public Works approval for 5ifiet driveways sloped greater than 8 percent. Project Location: The project is located at 2232 NE 24th Street in Northeast Renton, north of NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE. Project Location Map ercrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviroa_ al Review Committee Staff Report ' • JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY rLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,200( �(1•11 -1 "ST. Page 2 of IO , U $ �166J502 3169 9/.. —7--":- -- I I..../'. II , `_ II) $ 12);£ 14I ,❑ 222 :� =a 222 r i rg'I I l 11 a„,. P.02i-84 i I mb,n 314 v b' 1`�'1 .( ' 240 f 237 !aa 1KE OD L03I.,L. 66 S �l 2PA'K3 •D.D s •o g a-__®a L. IsiJ x4/r izdijr%/1Gf2 •iu 11361 "241 236 `12.23 „ ,5s ' J' , • .2—. ?r( b „r,� 0 i•�lo 1 Zv + o f�7 +w • ® 'l ,i� -ATE-2-bT c c A2 Y Y J i i ry � f7. 0 i 12,` 2J23 :96 TI,/, ! ui,' /xb,J:1 1` 64 `'11 0 I ,S , 24TH ST. ' 1 2 2 I Z l L3�1oii 24.,4 r• 5 ___J 212 8 y1 -,• : J _5 e 4^ IIMMF `` 8 242 y 2 -' !. 23 23,. •. N z�224 1 `� 4i S �'-rI.._ 1 W °' 3= _ �I• is N.E.23RD 17_9 y . . dg L 7 ;, ! rl x�`Ag ' V.. .. N2T, so '2 o�i�: $ ..-. NE � 3RD ST, ` •` Is :z— .b ' I -r 0$.0 ..4 ''" , i4.': r ".'.I4 f 11---^, Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: Existing structures to be Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf: N/A demolished. Site Area: 77,505.16 sf(1.78 acres) Total Building Area gsf: N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the responsible officials make the following environmental determination: DETERMINATION OF v DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. k, Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro, ral Review Committee Staff Report JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINAkr riAT L UA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 3 of 10 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new residence.The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. vtel 8. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the&ice County Surface Water Manual. The system will require retention of the 100-year storm plus thirty percent(30%)for safety factor. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. There is an existing 12"sanitary sewer main in NE 24th St. The engineer should refer to As Built drawing S2162 for more detailed information. 2. A sanitary sewer main extension will be required to be installed by this project to serve the parcel being developed. 3. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of-way, unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the street. 4. A sewer cleanout will need to be located five feet out from buildings. 5. Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual sewers). Side sewer lines must have a 2 percent slope. 6. All utility plans must comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 7. Show finished floor elevations on the sewer construction plan sheet. 8. The vertical profile of the sewer main will be required. 9. The project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Envira tal Review Committee Staff Report • . JACQUES'NE 24THSTREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 4 of 10 10. Any new sewer mains are to be separated from water lines by a minimum of 10 feet. There is a 7.5 foot minimum separation from other utilities. 46, 1-3 •0=' 11. Sewer Development Cha of$585.00 per single family residence will be required for this plat. The fee for this project would be$ , . . There is no credit given for existing houses. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. 12. An additional charge will be assessed for the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District No. 9204 (City of Renton Ordinance no. 4362, September 2, 1992). Although the amount will be determined later, it is estimated to be$485 per lot plus interest for the Area charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the Frontage Charge. Plan Review—Water 1. There is an existing 8"asbestos cement watermain in NE 24th St. 2. The proposed plat is located in the 435 water pressure zone. 3. A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full extent of the cul-de-sac)and additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed to serve the plat. 4. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the water main located approximately 7'from face of curb. 5. Fire hydrants will be required to current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. 6. Water System Development charges of$850.00 per new single family residence will be required for this plat(credit given for existing houses). The charge for this plan would bed This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. +7, (Vo.vo Plan Review—Stormwater Drainage 1. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order. 3. The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is shown on the conceptual drainage plan.. 4. The detention/water quality facility must be maintained by the Homeowners'Association. 5. There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. 6. The site appears to lie within the May Creek drainage basin. Due to the sensitivity of this creek system,we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process (see Mitigation Measures). 7. Drawings submitted to the City of Renton are to be on 22 inch x 34 inch sheets. 9. Before any construction or development activity occurs, a pre-construction meeting must be held with the City of Renton Development Services Division, Construction Services (425-277-5570). 10. The City of Renton retains the right to restrict the timing of land clearing and tree cutting activities to specific dates and/or seasons when such restrictions may be necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare, or for the protection of the environment. 11. Surface Water System Development charges of$385 per new single family residence will be required for this plat. No credit is given for existing houses. The fee for this project would be$ ®a. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. '454�23Gj,va • ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro, al Review Committee Staff Report . JACQUES'NE 24THSTREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 5 of 10 Plan Review-Transportation and Street Improvements 1. All electrical and communication facilities to be underground behind the sidewalk. If right-of-way space is not available then in a utility easement. 2. The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul- de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City of Renton Code states that if the street will require a cul-de-sac,which it does,then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated,with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for all houses.beyond 500 feet on dead-end streets. 4. Street lighting is required to meet City standards. Minimum lighting level is 6:1 uniformity ratio and 0.2 foot candle level. The street lighting conduit to be located under the sidewalk. 5. ar wi o 6. The cul-de-sac is required to have a minimum pavement radius of 45 feet and right-of-way radius of 55 feet. 7. A 5 foot sidewalk at the curb is required inside the plat and a 6 foot sidewalk on NE 24th St with a 5 foot planter strip between the curb and sidewalk is required. 8. NE 24th Street, abutting the project, shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving and streetlights. 9. Payment of a Transportation Mitigation fee of$75 per new average weekday trip, estimated at 9.55 new trips per single family lot, will be required prior to recording of the plat. It has been estimated that thi lot plat(credit would be given for the two existing houses)would result in approximately.248.,3 additional aver a (weekday) trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee would be$18,G22-a0. 89 .9 v. Zh . Plan Review-General 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. 2. The construction permit application(s)must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5 percent of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4 percent of anything over$100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3 percent of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements), and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Building Department Review 1. Demolition permits will be required. Fire Prevention Department Review 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. The temporary fire department turnaround will require curb cut and fire lane identification. 3. The 28-foot half street will require"No Parking"signs on one side. 4. The structures on Lots 9 and 10 are required to be sprinklered as they are beyond the 500-foot dead end roadway limit. ercrpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviro, al Review Committee Staff Report JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARI'PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 6 of 10 Property Services Department Review 1. Comments will be provided under separate cover. Development Services Department Review 1. The site is designated Residential Single Family in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). • 3. Densities allowed in the R-8 Zone are 5.0 dwelling units per net acre(du/a)minimum and 8.0 du/a maximum. 4. Minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4500 sf,with minimum width of 50 for interior lots and 60 for corner lots. The minimum permitted lot depth is 65 feet. Lot dimensions must be shown on the final site plan demonstrating that all lots meet these minimums. 5. Heights of buildings in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories, or 30 feet. 6. Required setbacks in the R-8 Zone are 20 feet for front yards facing NE 24th St(a street existing prior to September 1, 1995)and 15 feet for houses and 20 feet for attached garages which access from the front if fronting on the new public street to be constructed; 20 foot rear yard setbacks; 5 foot side yard setbacks for interior lots and 15 feet sideyard setbacks for corner lots. All setbacks are minimums. Lot 1,which is a corner lot, is shown to front the new street, not NE 24th Street. This must be approved during the Preliminary Plat review. Setback dimensions should be shown on the construction drawings, but setback lines must be removed prior to recording the final plat. 7. The maximum building coverage in the R-8 Zone is 50 percent for lots under 5,000 sf and 35 percent or 2500 sf for lots larger than 5,000 sf. 8. Protection measures for are required for trees located on abutting properties within 20 feet of the property line. 9. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits (RMC 4-4-130K), including"Protection Measures During Construction"(RMC 4-4-130K7)relating to trees, shall be followed by the applicant. The applicant shall adhere to the definition of"tree"a found in RMC 4-11-200,"drip line"as found in RMC 4-11-040, and the measurement of trees as found in RMC 4-11-030. 10. The applicant shall draft and record a maintenance agreement or establish a Homeowners'Association for the maintenance of all common improvements (access and utility easements, rights-of-way, and stormwater facilities). A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the recording of the preliminary plat. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth/Geology Impacts: The property is gently sloping from east to west,with grades at approximately 13 percent in the northeast corner. These are the steepest slopes on the property. According to the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey for the area, the soils on the property probably would be classified as Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slope (EvC)and Indianola loamy fine sand,4 to 15 percent slope(InC). The Everett soils are characterized by slow to medium runoff and slight to moderate erosion potential. The Indianola soils have rapid permeability with the same potential for runoff and erosion as Everett soils. These soils are both considered suitable for urban development. ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviror' al Review Committee Staff Report , JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY FLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 7 of 10 No mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable 2. Air Impacts: It is anticipated that some adverse air quality impacts would be associated with the site work, building construction phase of the project, and to a certain extent,with subsequent occupation of homes. Project development impacts include dust resulting from grading, exhaust from construction vehicles, and odors from roofing installation, and roadway paving. Dust would be controlled through the use of temporary erosion control measures and the sprinkling of the site as needed. Odor impacts are unavoidable and would be short-term in nature. Post development impacts include vehicle exhaust and the exhaust from heating. Vehicle and construction equipment exhaust, and exhaust from heating sources are controlled by state and federal regulations. No further site specific mitigation for the identified are recommended. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Water Impacts: There are no known wetlands or surface water bodies on the site and no indication that problems associated with groundwater would be encountered. The applicant will submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with construction drawings. In addition, measures beyond those required by Renton Municipal Code relating to surface water control during construction, are recommended as project mitigation. Mitigation Measures: The following are recommended mitigation measures for the proposed project: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in the most recent KCSWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. These measures will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements, as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of Record to the Public Works Inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. Nexus: Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-060,"Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations"; State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviror al Review Committee Staff Report , JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINAhr FLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 8 of 10 4. Transportation Impacts: The proposed project would be accessed from NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE.Aberdeen Ave NE is located west of the project and is controlled at its intersection with NE 24th St with a 4 way stop. Aberdeen Ave NE connects NE 12th St and NE Park Dr(south)with NE 27th St (north). Edmonds Avenue NE is east of the project. It forms a"T' intersection to the north, at NE 27th. NE 24th Street is a two-lane roadway.A new public street would be extended by the applicant through the plat from NE 24th Street. The intersection of this road and NE 24th Street should align with an existing street to the south, Camas Ave NE. The applicant was not required to submit a transportation report, but it is estimated, based on the International Transportation Engineers Manual, sixth edition,that the proposed project would generate approximately 9.55 new average daily trips (weekday)for each new single family residential home. Eleven lots are proposed, but credit would be given for the two existing houses. An estimated 86 trips per day will be added to the transportation system. The City of Renton has adopted a Transportation Mitigation Fee to address the impacts to the City's transportation system caused by development, including this proposed project. The applicant would need to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is estimated to be$6,446.25, and is payable prior to the recording of the plat. The applicant proposes to provide half-street improvements along the east property boundary to create the access road. The travel lane width would be twenty-eight feet within a thirty-five foot right-of-way. A six foot sidewalk would be on the west side of the street within the right-of-way area. City Code requires street improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage, and street lighting)within the plat and on all abutting streets. Improvements will be required to the north side of NE 24th the width of the property. New improvements must be connected to, and match, other improvements already in place. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-18-3 requires applicants to provide haul route plans for approval by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Haul hours are also restricted by the Code, and may occur only between the hours of 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday, unless approved in writing in advance by the Development Services Division. Hauling can be further restricted by the City if the route is near a school. These requirements are intended to diminish impacts on the transportation system resulting from construction of a project. In addition, traffic control measures are required to be provided during construction. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. The number of lots is 9 and the estimated number of trips per day, per single family lot, is 9.55. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; Environmental (SEPA)Ordinance (Code Section 4-6). 5. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would result in the construction of 11 single family lots. Future residents would potentially have the need for emergency services,which would impact the City's Fire Department. Fire Prevention Bureau staff report that they can serve this development provided that the City Code required improvements are installed, appropriate fire access is provided, and Fire Mitigation Fees are paid. In order to offset the impacts associated with new development, all new residential construction is subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee. The fee is calculated on a per lot basis. The current fee is$488.00 per single family lot. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$488.00 per new single family lot. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; Environmental (SEPA)Ordinance (Code Section 4-6). ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environ :1 Review Committee Staff Report , JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINAR 'ri;AT - LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 9 of 10 6. Parks and Recreation Impacts: There is a City of Renton developed park, Kennydale Lions Park located near the proposed project to the west at the corner of Aberdeen Avenue NE and NE 24th Street. The May Creek Greenway, a passive recreation and nature preserve area, is located nearby to the north. It is anticipated, however, that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of$530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the Parks Mitigation Fee equal to$530.76 per new single family lot. The Parks Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution and Adopting Ordinance; Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance(Code Section 4- 6). 7. Vegetation Impacts: An estimated 3 trees over 6" diameter at chest height will be removed prior to construction for roads and utilities. Due to grading for home sites, vegetation, including additional trees, will be removed. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: Not applicable 8. Land Use Impacts:The applicant has proposed subdividing a 77,505.16 square foot(1.78 acre)property into 11 lots. The project site consists of one legal tax parcel with two separate single family residences. The site is located in the Residential 8 (R-8)Zone,which allows up to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre(du/a). The applicant has proposed developing the land exclusively for the construction of single family, detached homes. The density of the proposed project is 7.86 du/a. The R-8 Zone has been established by the City of Renton for residential development and to prohibit the development of uses that are incompatible with the residential environment. Mitigation Measures: None recommended. Nexus: Not applicable E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ercrpt CO of Renton P/B/PW Department Enviror Review Committee Staff Report . JACQUES'NE 24TH STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA00-127,PP,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 7,2000 Page 10 of 10 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 27,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercrpt A PORTION of the N.E. 1/4, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., R.M. ,,.�:' e I ((77�: ��'Ii ?� . nAr mc� :[!it.vi '1R►y, N. BURR R r. f�iJwdnr'T.i as' as. ws '_``.•[I IBM—'r .ram _?, H ti =.� . �.w W '� _1$ �' Z . 17 4• AVICINITY MAP V)S m i e N.T.S C 0 a e e MM LINPI:omen aAs b•ASPHALT CCOMEIE W s li•-4 .^MY COVP omil CRUSHED SUTAOA, OP anew • • � , M ClC•T. p aN 9.1.Aa,B MAW CO,RY W y r Z • • M Aswr ISE RIOIMED MONO Sal ais �' y g5 s( W- 4. T(PICAL C1N-SIT- ROAD SF C.TIO 4 y `� �°• N.,.s. I W 4 t •+.— I... : Sw : _—— CAMAS _ r g '-i'/•��//, ___ ____ _ _ -__ =_-- - •'N.r - AVE. •ef lam• C ;1: �r r s 7 6 a J z ej, ^•i ��—�1 -V.'".�1, - —:� '�o�s,e —'T---�-- �1'r�r I RG 1II c. i 91 mice..FLEW .k.c40E TEE .-IE.r v s,R,i o o.uri I V 4. I y E i oerewnav vnw/vJ rvaxr I • VA 1 'a . es •(wya). ,•cery `y CJ I 0 y C�`. . VM YR Tw+T•.EM-gWE r - e3�rw•ED CAMP., N I ~ U °""� cur: wo FT x WEEK: "� Tv! rT Feu.. 2W FT. 1 AI r.� 2 Cw! �erFuc Zv0.uw.E'^ie a•(i E� (wei wV-. Ofl.v?) I .4 1 R wauv I . c _ NEmns I S<gR OAP C,E _1---_p5 _I? I I c) R i . . . ' 3y% PRmtafFA GR^DG —_— w yW 1 ws •••'s o.aor GRAPHIC SCALE 9wo W. 2roe i•ee .....—AM- .. P1K R_Ay_ PROFILE-- CN-SITE ROAD I u nu) w.n. +M wawa: w• Imm-m ti 4• fm, j • • CITY OF RENTON I CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ACTION NO. LUA— SHPL RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NO. LND— NE 24TH ST. PLAT • E. 7/4 OCR.OF SEC 5-23-5 CITY OF RENTON CONTROL MONUMENT/J69 . ELEV.-J3257 FEET NA14188 PER PLAT OF J.R.UTTEN ADD. 116rff AVE. SE "X 6a PG.65 _ _ 1580.48' NO'J7'DJ E 4 E.LINE OF RIf NC I/9 OF SEC.5-2J-5 3J1.87' I24767' • FOUND CONC MON IN CASE 5 NUM DELTA ARC RADIUS (BRASS CAP W/PUNCH) FOUND LONG MON IN USE CITY OF RENTON CONTROL (8RAS5 GP W/PUNCH) Cl 58'08'07- 55.81' 55.00' MONUMENT/f8J7 C2 JTJJ23' J2.21' 55.00' ELEV.-317.22 FEET NAV088 CJ 48'47'12' 46.83' 55.00' VISITED 4-28-2000 OF 6DEN I 1� I 2 N a h I GARD S Lp 0 S ASTT P�DI 2No I JO•NZ JD• I8. HILIIyANpDD. T y0L / I \ • • 9 / J B.Js•D• ,,�,r1CT 22 3�` NBJ0.01BTR/WWOOD FENCE/SEAST LINE OF TIE WEST M JO.01• r I FOUND CONC.W40N GCSE ON PROP.LINE >�TRAL7 � ACC FO E \ ) F£NC 8E REPUL is NO'JOL7E (BRASS /- ) ACCESS 6I 1.57' '�6 NO'JOY7E / W FENCE ON n� ] I .�; 9J. - r-�7a.41-1 440.00• \ \ BY f• — „ r r ' „ .. O CA.{fAS A(l' NE 'a • o o \I — — 3 rAx vARCELGlum oxlv£Yur •E,gI1 /JJ4J90-OB .j AREA YO 8E OF RENEO X 4-- -,,1 3 W __ �ot1'//^'y ,�0 0 all w Blvm, 30A ,�\ n TO INCRf CITY OF R£N1TpN , �JII 17 / p ....- ADD. A�" / I rt m m 19.67' +..J. /6/)y I i �1 Q Nb'JO'47 4 ^RPOR .;1. W R/W pLE ',ANC;I hr,y1 I I =-/ L N55 w �.L=13A•� / JJ.42' S0. 50.00' 0.0dL_ 54D0 S0 60.00'© K V / C ,,T}�D gG I t -- .66=--I �NOy T� G] - r_�r • DECK HOUSE O T� 0Nv0L. 9 I 2„ 1-- O'J0'47E� -— 93.49' J h( JO// rt I �o� HOUSE r I /•L - n l � � er I 20= (- ACNLES FOR FIRE h ^ •� .�� hURFORT ti w ' "/ W g0� /`` ESNT.FOR INGRESS ,3 !V ry ry A 4 ��ti 9 rml ? a £RESS AND UTILITIES �y ;_ I m I j ��I y' g I ]iaIm LBSBL L-s. BSa_ L. BSB T< Z �,, WOLINE FENCE ISJ ! ' 1 t---94.21'- J L' 6 —I r v v 5000v v v v v • �a ;�x—"-=--�x—snX 11 I h 7.05'N.OF PROP. -1J5.04= 5000' x NO'JO'47E 615.70' I -�V V ->< W WEST LINE OF TRACT 22J FENCE TO BE REPUCED ]C4 ' I BE BEHOVED IS77NG STRUCTURES ARE TO I]0^� NEW FENCE ON LINE—�C� II y TAX PARCEL TAX PARCEL I CT 236 /7280 •/0860 70 I I JO' I JO' LEGEND: I TREE SCHEDULE: I 3 PUT OR FOUND MONUMENT AS SHOWN I \I TOTAL TREE COUNT=72 TREES CO. FOUND 1/4 CORNER MON AS SHOWN 6'TRUNK DIAMETER OR GREATER • SET 5/8'ROAR AND CAP LS 29537 PD/NT/ OESC. • SET 2X2 LINE STAKE 1 ALDER 48' 1 MAPLE 24' X TRAVERSE POINT 3 ALDER TO' 4 ALDER 8' GRAPHIC SCALE E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT 5 ALDER 12' 6 ALDER 18' R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 7 FIR£R IOJ2• 9 FIR- 10' I BSBL BUILDING SETBACK LINE I D MAPLE-10-12' I I A1{L.A 1 R FIRE HIDRANT I2 PINE- 18' j $ D. �T['r l O SEWER MANHOLE.. (IN'FEET) Z. 1;f;Y've' q CENTERLINE 1 inch = 40 ft. o -��1. ' CONIFEROUS 1 yTi 0 DECIDUOUS IO'VAL LAB QURUTY POLE , 1a `.. D�Pe lvmn` F, rrT I • 6/4/2000 O OWN. BY DATE JOB NO. a EMW APRIL, 2000 JJCON-5A.FLX PORTION OF NE 1/4, SEC. 5, T23N, R5E, W.M. ° 0.BY SCALE T AILS 1=40' 2 OF 2 „ . 'T CITY F RENTON/ ..IL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 30, 2000 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon,WA 98274 Re: Jacques' 24th Street Preliminary Plat,LUA00-127,ECF, PP Property Services Comments Dear Mr. Hanson The following comments, applicable to the above-referenced proposed project,have been received by the Property Services Division. Note that these comments apply to both the current land use action,the Preliminary Plat, and the Final Plat. We have also enclosed a fee schedule of estimated costs. Preliminary Plat Comments: Use the city designated street name(Edmonds Ave NE) in place of the county designated 116th Ave SE that is currently noted on Sheet 2 of 2 of the plat submittal. Lines 5 and 6 of the legal description,noted on Sheet 1 of 2,repeat lines 2 and 3 of said legal description. Remove the last two lines. Final Plat Comments: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number,LUA-XX-XXX-FP and LND-10-0362,respectively,on the drawing,preferably in the upper right-hand corner. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat will be different from the preliminary plat and is unknown as of this date. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. Complete City of Renton Monument Cards, with reference points of all new right-of-way monuments set as part of the plat, if any. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Remove the building setback lines. Setbacks will be determined at time of building permits. Note all easements,agreements and covenants of record on the drawing, if any. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 • Mr.Jim Hanson October 30, 2000 ._ Page.2.of 2 The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary plat. The addresses will need to be noted on the drawing: On the final plat submittal,remove all references to trees,utility facilities,topography lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for the preliminary plat approval. See the attachment for the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Notice. The notice is not complete as currently shown on Sheet 1 of 2 of the subject plat submittal. • Note that if there are restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the plat: .The plat drawing and the associated documents) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s)for the associated ° document(s) should be referenced on the plat drawings in the appropriate location(s). An updated Plat Certificate will be required,dated,within 45 days'of Council action on approval • of the plat. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call me at 425-430-7382. • Sincerely Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner • Enclosures • • Co file Copy: • PROPERTY ; VICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIV DNS No. 2000 -04z, . APPLICANT: u25, q J�� �J RECEIVED FROM (date) JOB ADDRESS: 22..Sa 1J1= 24tt .. WO# 7874.Z NATURE OF WORK: PRELIMINARY REVIEW F SUBDIVISION BY LONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. 0 PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED 0 FRONT FOOTAGE - SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT eG,) k NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property..All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. ❑ We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS - NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER b " kEkul E 0016 C>='s=) t3830 1 1 RHI kliEr> Special Assessment District/WATER 00 Id, (,o,Rt=&') 4e 5)C Ul ltrs+l1.ir. 1 ) T -Ft►�i t r� Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER - - -- - - Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ.FTG. -- Single family residential$850/unit x 10 * 8,5cx3.CC Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x ( I * 6,439.00 Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq.ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated ❑Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x z3r'�,per All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x " (not less than$385.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ l C.!!J eL) • a e-CY1 fl�J • ICE new) C N Signat`u/�rr`,��gJf Rev' mg Authority DATE o LI ry o ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the a King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. - m ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to N. - m c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 • AQUIFER PROTECTION NOTICE • THE LOTS CREATED HEREIN FALL WITHIN ZONE 2 OF RENTON'S AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4367 AND AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4740. THIS CITY'S SOLE SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER IS SUPPLIED FROM A SHALLOW AQUIFER UNDER THE CITY SURFACE. THERE IS NO NATURAL BARRIER BETWEEN THE WATER TABLE AND GROUND SURFACE. EXTREME CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED WHEN HANDLING OF ANY LIQUID SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN WATER TO PROTECT FROM CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SURFACE. IT IS THE HOMEOWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE CITY'S DRINKING WATER. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: . October 20, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 k,kk. SUBJECT: 24TH ST PLAT 2232 NE 24TH ST APPLICATION LUA 00-127 I have reviewed the application for this 11 lot plat generally located in the vicinity of NE 24th ST and Camas Av NE in Section 5-23N-5E and have the following comments: WATER: • The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • The site is located in the 435 Pressure Zone • There is an existing 8" A. C. watermain in NE 24th ST. V • A minimum 8" watermain extension (the full extent of the cul-de-sac) and additional fire (.7- hydrants will be required to be installed to serve the plat. • The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show that the new main will be 8" in 1 diameter the full extent of the cul-de-sac with the watermain located approximately 7' from face of curb. • All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow r,; •,`.. requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 fee of any proposed single-family structure. If the . proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow '' . increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. / • Water System Development Charges of $850 per each new lot will be required for this project. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. 24th St Plat Application LUA 00-127PP October 23, 2000 Page 2 SEWER: • This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. ✓ • There is an existing 12" sanitary sewer main NE 24th St. The engineer on your project V` will want to review the AsBuilt drawing (S2162) for more detailed information. • A sanitary sewer main extension will be required to be installed by this project to 1/ serve the parcel being developed. • The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the sanitary sewer main in the new street. Sanitary sewer mains shall be designed to be located in the public right-of- way unless it can be demonstrated for engineering reasons that it can not be installed in the new street. • Dual sidesewers are not allowed. • This parcel is located in the East Kennydale Special Assessment District. This fee is $485 per lot plus interest for the Area Charge and $3830.00 per lot plus interest for the ✓ Frontage Charge. These fees shall be paid at the time a construction permit is issued. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $585 per each new lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • NE 24th St adjacent to the site shall be improved with curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving and street lights. • The new internal street shall be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. The right-of-way for the half street improvement • must be a minimum of thirty-five (35') with twenty-eight feet paved as shown on the conceptual utility plan. A curb and a six foot (6') sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. The City of Renton code states that if the street will require a cul-de-sac, which it does, then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated, with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to show the installation of the temporary hammerhead turnaround. • Projects that are 5-20 residential lots in size are required to install street lights will be required to be installed by this project on both NE 10th St and in the new cul-de-sac. • All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City • of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. • The Traffic Mitigation Fee of $716.25 per new lot shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. I , 24th St Plat Application LUA 00-127PP October 23, 2000 Page 3 STORM DRAINAGE: • The conceptual drainage plan and report appear to be in order. • The storm detention shall be located in a utility easement as is shown on the conceptual drainage plan. • There do not appear to be storm drainage facilities in NE 24th St. • The site appears to lie within the May Creek drainage basin. Due to the sensitivity of this creek system, we recommend additional drainage mitigation requirements through the SEPA process. The water quality treatment and detention shall be designed to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Due to our concerns for possible erosion and sedimentation problems from further construction activities on the site, we recommend the following conditions for this plat (for both preliminary plat development and future building permit for the individual lots): 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual, Appendix D. This will be required during the contruction of both off-site and on-site improvements was well as building contruction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design-and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on- site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. • • 24th St Plat Application LUA 00-127PP October 23, 2000 Page 4 • The Surface Water System Development Charges of $385 per each new lot applies to the proposed project. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. • 24THSTPLGF _ • City of Reirtvil Department of Planning/Building/Public s. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � } COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24,.2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth !fig ir� C E n/] 2 PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 U �j L� LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street _ OCT 1 0 2000 SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft.(1.78 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,g505.15 SF+/-prof erty •y m ,Apo; - i N Prelapplicant haslat pocess. The a division into property is zoned 11 lots that would tbe suitable for ht sinli egfamils er net�t a i,p. E ti.e lots would be proposedccssed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Exis ing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • CITY OF RENTON' RECEIV!'.. OCT 1 :. 2000 BUILDING DIVi ioN B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Othvr-40--Ce We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is eeded to properly ass "s this proposal. (7f- 7-3, z Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 Routing Rev.10/93 City ofR- 1 Department of Planning/Building/Public vvv s. • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S U1/4.) US> T- COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24,.2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 0rc•� LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street .�. 7011,• SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A �.�. % . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by'ifte s of the ®® Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acr)`�T'['he applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home develo �y The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sa . Existing structures woull�� 4„, removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics' Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS aX/C0--dak We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Z @DU Signature of Director or Authorized Rnresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public 1,v1-1irlS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:7( .1SF0ti -6fi(.31c\ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins 'fry PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 �' R Are. 0 LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street O(x"T" i SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A 4�1‘..4IL_ 'a Z000 es SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 772505.15 SF+1-property by me r1 !ayr Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). T /�/ applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing _ Air Aesthetics . Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals -'Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Szk. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional inform ti n is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Repres ative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of c:.rt Department of Planning/Bu ding/PubliL`t'!6 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1`OAIC.� COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet L arijr (Mt cis a (Atka tta ta n wtt c i pl qo 6Y+'c11 f6QCP Will `{) hr/ -0A),au-d, - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed t roperly assess this proposal. Signature f 'irector or A or d epresenta i e Date Routing Rev.10/93 Illie , . ... iiiii . v • City or rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Pu orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CO/S1-1AUC4-korvi Setn/tLP,S COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24,.2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgihsn1^cle. t PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 �'�* LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OC T .1 'Tik SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): NIA.,,,,,,, 88'11%4 LiI SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by meanqicAb Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet . 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS PoN6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe�•dditional information is needed to roperly assess this proposal. . _____.--. /6/06 St• ature of Director etherize resentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pub irks. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pa-MeS COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2000 _n APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE-CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 z. i r Ee APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins g j C PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 E ® '-"I rl LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street rr i n m '..m mZ t� a' SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by meaii of thce a Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre.a The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS. Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth --- Housing Air --- Aesthetics Water --- Light/Glare Plants --- Recreation y"----- Land/Shoreline Use -- Utilities Animals --- Transportation Environmental Health --- Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources -- Preservation Airport 10,000 Feet Environment 14,000Feet al— a<1P.Vr4-Xfie?,17. -)' ° Ca— ‘-fte,_.4 e 7 6726000/ 74--- cj%%/icS rj-t � ree..0reed-76,2,r- - \Y40---- 1 5-50 ) co /102A ,Qa-an AMA) y, '(,)1 6k s6c( L- 6 ia /-0 Liz-e:56eYety a.e,&e_ J /' 0c � , B. POLIC �-Y-RELATED COMMENTS WA/7.)Q_ i vt.___ Gam- 7' ) Zee42 4:2 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS r `' a) (7,11-)a- t64 r3 Ai We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where itional information is needed properly assess this proposal. /0'(A,I A IA1 a) Sign re of Director or Authorized epresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/PuII Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L-C.o Vzo1M1C 1 Ueltplvkk OOMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24,,2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10,2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson .. PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth HiggirgtE - PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 P''�i LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OC T , O 2000 SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) • BUILDING AREA gross : N/A EcoNoMtc,n-,. AND. .`°F7"94en ` SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-prope �'M4:=g ttko Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). e - applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS " 15 Q L�1 cs j ryr 670 12isSl`C D \l'7/YT--t - , \I'L.1�1� r�l t c__Lr' l N f 7 0-6- C_6 1"-vna2(31c)-LrnCS \VZ.s 6'Ln71/ ,. O\fD G'6 LA-C✓y I SS U c,3 . C� J J Pint-_S C 6' ,lnf t r✓L,_ OLk7Y LsoGZ t�S11Z�sPT 7z%1 �, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have r- -d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area here additio .I-in a •• ion is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature l irector g� uthorized Representative Date Routing i Rev.10/93 41110 eet Plat (LUA-00-127,PP,ECF) 10/23/2000 City of Renton Density Worksheet for Development in the R-8 Zone According to Renton's City Code,the standards for new development in the R-8 Zone require that residential densities fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per net developable acre. (Section 4-31-5.D.2) The code does not require that the lots be developed simultaneously. However, the land must be platted so as not to preclude future development at an appropriate density. 1) Total parcel size minus street r-o-ws and sensitive areas: 61049.3 square feet 2) Net Acreage (line 1 divided by 43560): 1.40 acres dwelling units net density 3) Maximum and minimum allowed dwelling units Max. 11 7.85 and respective net densities: Min. 8 5.71 4) 61049.34 sq ft and 11 dwelling units result in a density of 7.85 d.u./acre. Deductions from gross area: 16455.82 for road dedication. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.S ER\DEV&PLAN.I N G\D ENCA LC.XLS • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 23,2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Sonja J.Fesser SUBJECT: NE 24th Street Plat,LUA-00-127,PP Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced preliminary plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: Use the city designated street name(Edmonds Ave NE) in place of the county designated 116th Ave SE that is currently noted on Sheet 2 of 2 of the plat submittal. Lines 5 and 6 of the legal description,noted on Sheet 1 of 2, repeat lines 2 and 3 of said legal description. Remove the last two lines. Information needed for final plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-XX-XXX-FP and LND-10-0362, respectively, on the drawing,preferably in the upper right-hand corner. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat will be different from the preliminary plat and is unknown as of this date. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. Complete City of Renton Monument Cards,with reference points of all new right-of-way monuments set as part of the plat, if any. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Remove the building setback lines. Setbacks will be determined at time of building permits. Note all easements, agreements and covenants of record on the drawing, if any. WFS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\FILE.SYS\LND\10\0362\RV001017.doc October 17, 2000 Page 2 Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary plat. The addresses will need to be noted on the drawing. On the final plat submittal,remove all references to trees, utility facilities,topog lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for the preliminary plat approval. See the attachment for the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Notice. The notice is not complete as currently shown on Sheet 1 of 2 of the subject plat submittal. Note that if there are restrictive covenants or agreements to others as part of this subdivision,they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The plat shall have the first recording number. The recording number(s)for the associated document(s) should be referenced on the plat drawings in the appropriate location(s). An updated Plat Certificate will be required, dated within 45 days of Council action on approval of the plat. • Fee Review Sheet Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for the preliminary plat review is provided for your use and information. City ww nenton Department of Planning/Building/Pu lip vvo,xs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I vice,--l`I ti kcc COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 24, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 10, 2000 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: 24th Street Plat WORK ORDER NO: 78742 RECEIVED LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street RECEIVED SITE AREA: 77,505 sq.ft. (1.78 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A t 1 3 2D00 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/- proper Teethe Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per r eiT.ENFhe applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 ,._ CITY 411PF RENTON ..t�. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • October 27, 2000 Mr. and Mrs.Dennis Mitchell 2224 NE 24`h Street Renton,WA 98056 Re: Jacques' 24th Street Preliminary Plat,LUA00-127,PP,ECF Dear Mr. and Mrs.Mitchell Thank you for your letter of October 20,2000,regarding your concerns and questions about the proposed 24th Street Preliminary Plat. City staff is currently reviewing the proposal. "Regarding = your concerns: • 1. A traffic study was not required for this project because Engineering Plan Review has resources available to assess the impact of this 11-lot subdivision and will make recommendations based on that information. 2. .The recorded survey will indicate the location of the property boundary,not the ;remaining survey stakes. Construction staking is based on the survey information. The City considers property disputes between property owners to be private matters to be worked out between the affected property owners. City code requires driveways to be located five feet from the property line,unless used jointly by two properties: 3. The State of Washington's Growth Management Act requires that each city accommodate its projected population and this growth must remain within city limits,in' order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressures on wildlife that comes with increasing development.As part of our long range planning we have identified wildlife corridors within the city where it is hoped urban wildlife will find refuge. The May Creek Gree nway.is one of these.By concentrating the growth within the city, the hope is to provide greater op portunities for ' - wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of,the city. 4. The City of Renton has Development Regulations intended to protect trees on abutting properties during development These include: •. Performance Standards for Land Development Permits,RMC 4-4-130K . . (included herewith) • "Protection Measures During Construction",RMC 4-4-130K7,relating to trees • (included herewith) • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 . Mr. and Mrs.Dennis.Mitchell • Renton,WA 98056 October.27,2000 Page;2 of 2 The above requirements may apply in your situation,using the following definitions from the City of"Renton Municipal Code:. . • The definition of:"tree"as found in RMC 4-11-200; "Any living plant characterized by one main stem or trunk and many branches and having a caliper. of six inches(6")or greater,or a multi-stemmed trunk system with a definitely formed crown." • The definition of"drip line"as found in RMC_4-11-040;"A tree's trip line shall be described by a line projected to the ground delineating the outermost extent foliage in all directions." • The definition of"caliper"as used in the measurement of trees as found in RMC. 4-11-030; "The diameter of any tree trunk as measured at a height of four and one-half feet above the ground on the upslope side of the tree." If the proposed project is approved;•certain trees,as indicated on a tree inventory submitted by the applicant,would be removed from their property to locate an access road and underground utilities. The applicant has expressed the intention of retaining as many of the existing trees as possible however._ 5. The City of Renton would require temporary erosion control,measures during construction, and'a post-construction surface:water drainage control system. The access street would be paved with curb,gutter,;and:sidewalk: !- Thank you again for your interest in this project.'Your letter and our response will be forwarded to the project applicant to"ensure that they are aware of your concerns. .';' .. If you have additional question,please do not hesitate to contact me at-425-430-7382. Sincerely Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner Enclosure• • Copy: Jim 1- son,,n Jim • • • • 4-4-130K 3. Restrictions for Sensitive Areas: upon application by the property owner or man- ager. Application for such an extension must be a. Steep Slopes and Erosion Hazard made at least thirty (30) days in advance of the Areas: For all properties, no land clear- expiration of the original permit and shall include ing,tree cutting, or ground cover man- a statement of justification for the extension. agement activities except enhancement activities are permitted in areas with K. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR slopes over forty percent(40%), slopes .LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMITS: over twenty five percent(25%)with Class II or Class Ill landslide hazards, and 1. Prohibition Against Clear Cutting of slopes over twenty five percent (25%) Trees:There shall be no clear cutting of trees with Class II or Class Ill erosion hazards, on a site for the purpose of preparing that site as identified by the King County Soils for future development. Trees may be re- Survey, King County Sensitive Areas moved pursuant to a development permit Map Folio or the City Environmentally which has been approved by the City.. Sensitive Areas Maps. 2. Tree Preservation:Trees shall be main- b. Wetlands,Shorelines,Creeks and tained to the maximum extent feasible on the Streams: For all properties, no land property where they are growing. clearing, tree cutting or ground cover management activities except enhance- a. Tree Cutting Plan:Where it is not - . ment activities are permitted in wetlands practicable to retain all trees on site due including a minimum buffer area of to a proposed development, a plot plan twenty five feet(25'),riparian corridors in- shall be submitted identifying those trees cluding a minimum buffer area of twenty which are proposed for removal.The City five feet(25')from the high water mark of may require a modification of the land the creek or stream, and in the two hun- clearing and tree cutting plan or the asso- dred foot (200') State shoreline area. ciated land development plan to ensure the retention of the maximum number of I. ROUTINE VEGETATION trees. MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS: The routine vegetation management permit may b. Plan Content:The plot plan shall be denied or conditioned by the City to restrict the identify the location of all areas proposed timing and extent of activities in order to further to be cleared including building sites, the intent of this Section including: rights-of-way, utility lines, and ease- ments.Clearing should not occur outside 1. Preserve and enhance the City's aes- of these areas or more than fifteen feet thetic character and maintain visual screen- (15')from the foundation line of proposed ing and buffering. buildings. 2. Preserve habitat to the greatest extent 3. Native Growth Protection Easements: feasible. a. Where Established: Native growth 3. Prevent landslides, accelerated soil protection easements may be estab- creep, settlement and subsidence hazards. lished through the subdivision process in environmentally sensitive areas including _ 4. Minimize the potential for flooding, ero- but not limited to the following areas: sion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other form of pollution in a watercourse. i. A buffer area from the annual high water mark of creeks, streams, J. TIME LIMITS FOR PERMITS: lakes and other shoreline areas or Any permit for routine vegetation management from the top of the bank of same, shall be valid for one year from the date of issu- whichever provides good resource ance.An extension may be granted by the Devel- protection. opment Services Division for a period of one year • 4-87 '4-4-130K ii. Areas in which the average slope 6. Additional Requirements:The City is greater than forty percent (40%). may require and/or allow the applicant to re- locate or replace trees, provide interim ero- iii. Wetlands. sion control, hydroseed exposed soils, or • other similar conditions which would imple- iv. Any other area which is deter- ment the intent of this Section. mined through the environmental re- view process to include significant 7. Protection Measures During Con- vegetation or other valuable re- struction: sources and which should be pro- tected. a. Where tree cutting or land clearing will occur pursuant to a building permit, b. Recording:This easement shall be protection measures should apply for all defined during the review process and . trees which are to be retained in areas shown on the recorded plat or short plat. immediately subject to construction. These requirements may be waived pur- c. Use Restrictions: No land clearing, suant to RMC 4-9-250D individually or ground cover management or tree cutting severally by the City if the developer activities are permitted in a native growth demonstrates them to be inapplicable to protection easement except enhance- the specific on-site conditions or if the in- ment activities or the installation of es- tent of the regulations will be imple- sential roads and utilities where no other mented by another means with the same feasible alternative exists pursuant to an result. approved development plan. b. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps 4. Timing:The City may restrict the timing a construction, this shall be indicated on of the land clearing and tree cutting activities the survey and the following tree protec- to specific dates and/or seasons when such tion measures should be employed: restrictions are necessary for the public health, safety and welfare, or for the protec- i. The applicant may not fill, exca- tion of the environment, or to further the pur- vate, stack or store any equipment, poses of this Section. or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip 5. Restrictions for Sensitive Areas: line of any tree to be retained. a. Creeks, Streams, Lakes and ii. The applicant shall erect and Shorelines: No ground cover or trees maintain rope barriers or place bales which are within a minimum of twenty five of hay on the drip line to protect feet(25')of the annual high water mark of roots. In addition,the applicant shall creeks, streams, lakes, and other shore- provide supervision whenever equip- line areas or within fifteen feet(15')of the mentor trucks are moving near trees. top of the bank of same should be re- moved, nor should any mechanical iii. If the grade level adjoining to a equipment operate in such areas except tree to be retained is to be raised,the for the development of public parks and applicant shall construct a dry rock trail systems, and enhancement activi- wall or rock well around the tree.The ties. diameter of this wall or well must be equal to the tree's drip line. b. Wetlands: No land clearing, ground cover management or tree cutting activi- iv. The applicant may not install im- ties except enhancement activities shall pervious surface material within the be conducted in a wetland,except for the area defined by the drip line of any installation of roads and utilities where no tree to be retained. feasible alternative exists pursuant to an approved development plan. c. The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be lowered within the • A nn 4-4-140C greater of the following areas: (1)the place the lost tree(s) or a minimum of three area defined by the drip line of the tree,or inches (3") in caliper. (2) an area around the tree equal to one foot(1') in diameter for each one inch 5. Stop Work: For any parcel on which (1") of tree caliper. trees and/or ground cover are improperly re- moved and subject to penalties under this d. The applicant shall prune branches Section,the City shall stop work on any exist- and roots,fertilize, and water as appro- ing permits and halt the issuance of any or all priate for any trees and ground cover future permits or approvals until the property which are to be retained. is fully restored in compliance with this Sec- tion and all penalties are paid. (Ord. 4219, L. VARIANCE PROCEDURES: 6-5-1989) The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of this Sec- tion pursuant to RMC 4-1-050F1q and 4-9-250. 4-4-140 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES: M. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: A. PURPOSE: 1. Penalties: Penalties for any violation of The purpose of this Section is to establish general any of the provisions of this Section shall be guidelines for the siting of wireless communica- in accord with RMC 1-3-2, Civil Penalties. In tions facilities, including towers and antennas. a prosecution under this Section, each tree removed, damaged or destroyed will consti- B. GOALS: tute a separate violation. (Ord. 4351, The goals of this Section are to: 5-4-1992) 1. Encourage the location of towers in non- 2. Liability for Damage: Any person who residential areas and minimize the total num- violates any provision of this Section or of a ber of towers throughout the community; permit issued pursuant thereto shall be liable for all damages to public or private property 2. Encourage strongly the joint use of new arising from such violation,including the cost and existing tower sites; of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to such violation. 3. Encourage users of towers and antennas to locate them, to the extent possible, in ar- 3. Restoration: Restoration shall include eas where the adverse impact on the commu- the replacement of all improperly removed nity is minimal; ground cover with species similar to those which were removed or other approved spe- 4. Encourage users of towers and antennas cies such that the biological and habitat val- to configure them in a way that minimizes the ues will be replaced.Restoration shall include adverse visual impact of the towers and an- installation and maintenance of interim and tennas;and emergency erosion control measures until such time as the restored ground cover and 5. Enhance the ability of the providers of trees reach sufficient maturation to function in telecommunications services to provide such- compliance with the performance standards services to the community quickly,effectively, identified in subsection E of this Section,Reg- and efficiently. ulations for Land Clearing and Tree Cutting and the Development of Property;and C. EXEMPTION FOR AMATEUR RADIO, RECEIVE ONLY ANTENNAS: 4. Replacement: For each tree which was This Section shall not govern any tower,or instal- improperly cut and/or removed, replacement lation of any antenna,that is under seventy (70) planting of a tree of equal size,quality and feet in height and is owned and operated by a fed- species or up to three (3)trees of the same erally licensed amateur radio station operator or species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s) is used exclusively for receive only antennas. which was removed.The replacement trees will be of sufficient caliper to adequately re- 4-89 • Dennis&Diane Mitchell 2224 NE 24th Street Renton,WA 98056 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 5 2000 Elizabeth Higgins, AICP,Project Manager RECEIVED Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 October 20, 2000 Re: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF Dear Ms. Higgins, I am writing to you in reference to a proposed development at 2232 NE 24th Street. I have numerous concerns and questions in regards to this development. 1. Has there been a traffic study done? NE 24th Street has become increasingly busy. This concerns me for a number of reasons. There is a city park on the corner,which draws many children to it. Many of these children use NE 24th Street and they travel on foot, by bike, roller blades and increasingly often by skateboard. There are also school bus stops on this street. I think a traffic study would be an important step in assuring the safety of our children in the neighborhood. 2. From the signboard at the street I have read that the existing fence will be replaced with a new fence. There are several problems with this. First of all the survey stakes have been moved by Mr. Bozeman's workers. Another problem is that our cement driveway is over the suggested property line. This matter is under discussion, but has not been resolved. 3. Has any thought been given to the wildlife that will be disrupted?For many years there have been deer in the fields, on and surrounding this property. 4. A very personal concern for me is the trees on my property. I am immediately west of 2232 NE 24t' and I have several trees that are over 40 years old. In the front.there is a large maple tree that is on the corner just off the property line. I am very concerned that as building starts,the roots of this tree will be damaged, or other parts of the tree will be hurt as heavy equipment is brought in. The trees on my property are very important to me and if they are damaged, a 40+year old tree cannot just be replaced after the fact. I'm not sure what the options or guarantees are in regards to this matter, but I would like the matter addressed. In conjuctin with this concern, what about the trees at 2232? There are several large, old trees. Will these be logged, left standing or just torn up? Will they be replanting large shade trees that are taken down? 5. Because our home is west of 2232, and we are on a hill I'm concerned about run off. While we have a cement driveway 2232 does not. Currently the gravel from the driveway of 2232 washes down across our driveway. Excavation and building will cause more erosion and any material that is involved in runoff will end up in my yard. Our there plans to address the runoff during and after construction? I thank you for taking the time to address my concerns. Please feel free to contact me. I am listed as a person of interest so you have the telephone numbers where I may be contacted. Thank you, fi Diane Mitchell e0FIS'U. ROtJND1NG PROPERTY OWN;:ERS ttnE n�oo" .::::::::::;.:...:...:............:....:...:...... `_ < _: �>:<>« PROJECT NAME: JAC Qt,.l � 2 -1!4- S`?' PLAT APPLICATION NO: LU 00 - I fl1 'Pr, ELY The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSORS PARCEL.. NUMBER D'='JEI.OI'MENTPLAVNIN( cur(d(=PtN i ON • Donald Wik 4216 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0130 SEP Renton,WA 98056 2 20�� Shirley Lorrigan 2402 NE 241h St 272000 0140 "'d � ® Renton,WA 98056 Billy Jones 2311 NE 27th St 334390 0700 Renton,WA 98056 Billy Jones 23311 NE 27th St 334390 0701 Renton,WA 98056 Leslie Job Recor 2323 NE 27th St 334390 00821 Renton,WA 98056 D D Eades 2319 NE 27th St 334390 0822 Renton,WA 98056 David Earl Reid 2315 NE 27th St 334390 0704 Renton,WA 98056 Duke&Gail Grant 2241 NE 27`h St 334390 0821 Renton,WA 98056 Garret Akerboom 2301 NE 27th St 334390 0822 Renton,WA 98056 Keith&Annette Demps 2308 NE 24th St 334390 0860 Renton,WA 98056 James Jacques 2234 NE 24th St 334390 0861 Renton,WA 98056 James Jacques 2234 NE 24th St 334390 0861 Renton,WA 98056 Lester Danielson 2204 NE 2461 St 334390 1280 Renton,WA 98056 Dennis&7 Diane Mitchell 2224 NE 24th St 334390 1281 Renton,WA 98056 Ronald&Kathryn Hoffman 2200 NE 24th St 334390 1282 Renton,WA98056 Charis Baack 2202 NE 24th St 334390 1283 Renton,WA 98056 Joel&Mari Cervantes 2225 NE 271 St 3343901321 Renton,WA 98056 Bernice Andrew 2201 NE 27t St 3343901335 Renton,WA 98056 Neal&Patricia Lettich 2207 NE 27th St 334390 1340 Renton,WA 98056 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S 3343901441 Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S 334390 1480 Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S 334390 1481 Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S 334390 1485 Renton,WA 98055 Danny&Corrine Ericco 2125 NE 24t St 3343901521 Renton,WA 98056 David&Beth Peeler 2614 Camas Ave NE 382350 0010 Renton,WA 98056 Carlee Alan 2608 Camas Ave NE 382350 0020 Renton,WA 98056 Richard Bogart&Gregory& PO Box 2017 382350 0030 Bra Bogar Renton,WA 98056 Marcel&Laurie Depart 2605 Camas Ave NE 382350 0040 Renton,WA 98056 David&Joann Campbell hi 2611 Camas Ave NE 382350 0050 Renton,WA 98056 Mark&Susan Turner 2315 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0010 Renton,WA 98056 Katherine Gentile 2311 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0020 Renton,WA 98056 Penny&Wesley Price& 2307 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0030 J Linda Renton,WA 98056 0 Quynh Hoang&Mai Ha 2320 Camas Ave NE 034570 0220 Renton,WA 98056 CIarence Jahn 2326 Camas Ave NE 034570 0230 Renton,WA 98056 Tracy Alan&Cynthia 2332 Camas Ave NE 034570 0240 Jean Russell Renton,WA 98056 Mary Wolfe 2317 Camas Ave NE 034570 0250 Renton,WA 98056 Duane Teachout 4190 153w Rd Ave SE 034570 0260 Bellevue,WA 98006 Elisa Truitt&Eric Ek 2309 Camas Ave NE 034570 0270 Renton,WA 98056 Michael Prabucki 2305 Camas Ave NE 034570 0280 Renton,WA 98056 Duane Keyes 2302 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0320 Renton,WA 98056 Matt&Dawn Wilkinson 2308 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0330 Renton,WA 98056 Kristin Harrower 2314 Blaine Ave NE. 034570 0340 Renton,WA 98056 Michelle Gamelin 2320 Blaine Ave NE 034570 0350 Renton,WA 98056 J E Phelan 2401 NE 24th St 064630 0050 Renton,WA 98056 Dj Jenks 2325 NE 24th St 064630 0110 Renton,WA 98056 Peter&Darleen Wimmer 6011 1218t Ave SE 064630 0120 Bellevue,WA 98006 Lakin Family The 2401 Dayton Ave NE 064630 0130 Renton,WA 98056 N R Mcandrews 2312 NE 24th St 272000 0010 Renton,WA 98056 Charles&Theresa Bohanon 2417 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0020 Renton,WA 98056 Michael Bates 2425 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0030 Renton,WA 98056 Ushani Nanayakkara 2501 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0040 Renton,WA 98056 Matthew Hough&April 31427 37t Ave SW 272000 0050 Tomala Federal Way,WA 98023 Mark&Danette Mcnulty 2517 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0060 Renton,WA 98056 Joseph&Lori Macauley 2501 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0070 Renton,WA 98056 F Metz 2524 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0080 Renton,WA 98056 Peter&Darlene Wimmer 6011 121s`Ave SE 272000 0090 Bellevue,WA 98006 Kathleen Palmer 2508 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0100 Renton,WA 98056 Kurt&Kimberly Jahn 2500 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0110 Renton,WA 98056 Peter&Suzanne Olson 2424 Dayton Ave NE 272000 0120 Renton,WA 98056 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, 04m / G rc &/ , hereby certify that the above list(s)of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: - RIL A MARILYN KAMCHEFF D City of Renton Technical Services FibigaTARY PUBLIC a.Title Company Records STATE OF WASHINGTON CI County Assessors Records ( COMMISSION EXPIRES � JUNE 29, 2003 • Signed o� Date ?a )C) (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing a �cy, �, on the*7'Nay of 4f •1 Signe(14(4a.A.,,,, MARILYN KAMCHEFF (Notary Public) MYAPPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-2903 .�.� . ' ;.. '"*`"`For City of Renton Use"*** •- CERTIFICATION OF MAIL! MARILYN f 4��CHEFh .. OTARY PUBLIC I,SavZ->,a-K 5�-�-1—r hereby certify that notices of the prop to (City Employee) CON MISSION EXPIRES r each listed property owner on 'Io. 101 b-0 ` JUNE 29, 2003 Signed SW/WA- is Date: 10/6-0 d NOTARY ATT ST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in 9nd for the State of Washington residing at ,Q n a-eLei on the 2 b 4-4-day of t 9c. - Signed listprop.doc REV 07/98 MARILYN KAIVICHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 • U�� O� 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water Row and route the flaw away from the +®4. construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established In the ditch by seeding or placing sod.Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion �NrrQ. and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SW DM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater NOTICE OF APPLICATION across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as buildingconstruction. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation conhol measures • SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, M) at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works ' Inspector for the construction of the civil Improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation,maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. DATE: October 10,2000 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per each new average • LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF • weekday trip attributable to the project.estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. APPLICATION NAME: 24'STREET PLAT 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee al a rate of 5488.00 per each new single family residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/_property by means lot created by the proposed plat.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. of the Preliminary Plat process.The property Is zoned Residential-8(eight dwelling units per net acre). The 7. The applicant shall paythe appropriate Parks Miti Mitigation Fee at the rate of$530.76per each new single applicant has proposed a division Into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development ThePp 99 family lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated In a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be residential lot.The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 1 removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24'Street Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000.This OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,Mj:As the Lead Agency,the City of matter Is also scheduled for a public hearing an December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are interested In ahending the hearing,please contact the give notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are cannot be submitted Services Division,(the a Indicated do abvre that maytha still hearing has not been hearingng and If comments h ro sobmbefo in writing Hearing the date er.Ifyo above,you still appear at the l,owish and be mate your comments Integrated Into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner, you have questions about this proposal,or to he made a party of Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written of the DNS-M. comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 27,2000 CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 ' NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2000 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Permits/Review Requested: Preliminary Plat approval .u__ .ten1._-1__-"__. Other Permits which maybe required: Construction Permits,Building Permits 0 r�� 1 ate,,,._: Requested Studies: (SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report --'il lh, Pn l!1. F`i Environmental SEPA Chec I I1 i H St y'— � Location where application may L"-'• i 1 be reviewed: Planning/Bullding/Public Works Division,Development Services as °all.tr�;f': Ivi Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA • I-ID"j cA 98055 • 240- 237 I, • y- -L.- PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing i . MIL v Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the e—run. '' '° • 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 105$South Grady Way. =_ Wrier`:r F1 t••2 , CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: 241• 236 �`12. - i F�r�: eta 4 Land Use: Single family residential a •_ 4 I:- Zoning: Residential S(eight dwelling units per net acre) ::. rr' D,y-E 7IL cm, Environmental Documents that c ,''. • Evaluate the Proposed Protect: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report .°J14%: 1 'f 1 I' I�I!s1?Ma �+H._1Development Regulations 1 , j r El"y I) ,°Id Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King 24TH St • ,L County Surface Water Design Manual E,a-J ,,„f`.ai o� •4I , Proposed Mitigation Measures: ..g. p 15,' z � 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed.The silt fence �,•-^ iv Q kll(Q ini",. Q shall be in place before clearing and grading is Initiated,and shall be constructed in conformance with the r-7.1 2�eet.,,y in it, N.,23RD specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual,Appendix D.This 344 +. a1a��""1•'1 � 7 N will be required during the construction of both off-site end on-site Improvements as well as building construction. -- m NOTICE OF APPLICATION �, 11�. NOTICE OF APPLICATION a-,e NE RD ST _ CERTIFICATION �I(e. e (�.��j I, A A q,u r_.I , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • the described property o • n . O i--: /0, Z. x Signed: ,� r a., ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pubhc,in and for the State of Washington residing in` )' v n °1-9r , on the a S day of deb. 6') • 61/?AI ILYN KAMCHEFF • , , NOTARY PUBLIC / ! STATE OF WASHING T ON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29, 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-2903 0• So NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- • SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, M) DATE: October 10,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-127,PP,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 24TH STREET PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 77,505.15 SF+/-property by means of the Preliminary Plat process. The property is zoned Residential—8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). The applicant has proposed a division into 11 lots that would be suitable for singe family home development. The lots would be accessed by a new public street terminated in a half cul-de-sac. Existing structures would be removed. PROJECT LOCATION: 2232 NE 24th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 27,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Preliminary Plat approval Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department,Sixth Floor City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for December 12,2000,before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Single family residential Zoning: Residential 8(eight dwelling units per net acre) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental(SEPA)Checklist,Drainage Report Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Renton Municipal Code,State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),King County Surface Water Design Manual Proposed Mitigation Measures: • I. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual,Appendix D. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 4 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or • placing sod. Depending on site grades,it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion • and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the 1990 SWDM. Temporary pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the public works inspector for the construction of the civil improvements of the plat. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to recording of the plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per each new average • . weekday trip attributable to the project, estimated to be 9.55 average weekday trips per new single family lot. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$488.00 per each new single family residential lot created by the proposed plat. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. 7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $530.76 per each new single family residential lot. The fee is due prior to the recording of the plat. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 24,2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 12,2000,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • • CONTACT PERSON: ELIZABETH HIGGINS,(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION "T r__ 4 I 1�INN I /ENNVN111r' ssI �Y 1 ® r�l ... 2 H "St. '• �� O 9 7W4qtir, ,41 i Ig" 240 237 ;aaKE NYD LEA.iE�_L__._la0_ III by •Z ; K3 D.D goo 2 .l SIZ,J I✓p Ko , ®°r, 1st.3 Ja/s .Ja(s' 6.3 2J6 •SZ 6 03 13 dit ers4 o 241 236 • 161 0 16 r,q ° 10 Yr 7z oa v, 43. A6.! - iLA ® I I NE_257 l /3 13 • •°M I O .32 .2 ••.N�I C LCU ►1 �1 O ___pl`•___J� 2■ l� J it CRyY N i ll [ g - u7J � I I%Y" >rsj I 'WS II °EJJ CO `JI to • 24TH ,` ST. I-,130 I / / 67. , '•65/6 e13i 1•E33E 3' 60 p ,az N 33 E �a 23 k 29� 13' B --I21t' J0 "= 03.73 OM y!AE�t •� 242 y 2 w 34 n IR 23 731• 6t��. .. 130 I 3 • Qkk 33 27 RQ• 22 4'I Qli �" � 'O •� 6.._.,•; W„'32t� ,a N.E.23RD C9p3 ' a� b ,��31$ 307 25 ta4S '�+ J . E 8 3 m R 20 32 NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2216 E.:: f�na 444' 4U' .VQ 7 . z 1-7 a s e 'a N.E. ' RD ST.,4 1 � �°e �5 2 .. , . . . /- 4 r_:,,, , - . " CITY 1 I? RENTON' / ..1 : _ Planning/Building/Public Works.Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • October 10, 2000. - Mr. Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Love Lane Mt.Vernon,WA 98274 SUBJECT: 24t'Street Plat Project No. LUA-00-127,PP,ECF. ; " Dear Mr: Hanson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and,,.therefore, is accepted for review. The proposed project is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 7, 2000. Please clarify, however, as soon as possible, the size of the property. We have the following information: 76,482 .sq.ft. (master application and narrative), 77,505.16 sq.ft. (surveyor's calculation), and 78,482 sq.ft. (tax records) A Public Hearing will be held by the.Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, _ Washington, on December 12, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Preliminary Plat. •The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part , of this public hearing. - - Please contact me, at(425)430-7382, if you have any questions._ Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins Senior Planner cc: . Mr.J. Jacques/owner • tong Washington accoptanco - . . .• 1055 South Way-Ren 9 8055 - : -'. ' .. - Y:€OF>REN•T::ON ::' :'::':::€>':> > > :€:..:..:::: :'::':':: >:z> .i.:.::< `::;:: ::: <:::::>:::><:>::: :c< :''.:>:' ::::»::>::>::>:::>;::::>::>:: ::::>.:.................:...•:::•:::::::::::::«<: ••••;:: >:;::: :<:::•••.•:... -.::::::::>::»':::..:+CITY... ...... • :: I C :«. T _` :,.`:._ ' <t ` : :: :::«:;::;<»:««iii :iP1 .0 :;E:.:: ::Y:PW:NER P;:::<:::>::giiii::>>< :»::>::>:>>I:.;: :.. :ai':::::>::::>::il:i..........R. . . . ...... . ... .RM ..TIO.N................................ N4tA 'a` :If.:;thtrres�roe:ttian;ore::l.:e.9al,ovvrierple:a��;att h...n.:.....:.::..o....... hoYattoctIv dtt&400:1T6i i Srt foC eathitei vtibif :„ .. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ....::.;:.;::. .... ..:: : ::::::. .. sJ ACcz,(.,LG S g,k I K 5 T PLAT NAME: cjAMes i/lCq"6- PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS 6.09 Ii Obi DEe-�1 !� lt&- Ai E Z iJE t' ��" r1' gNJTOA) ik- CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 12Exiroici • -3 3 Lt v( 0 -06 / TELEPHONE NUMBER: a5 _ 2.55 g 3�Z EXISTING LAND USE(S): 7 -7j 6) '6 - FApi,et RE6di)I uCES ` `er ; t ' `h''nor o PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: 4 i Y>ti rtl%sz,.tJ Ras! D4A_rr/AL Scx,B iU7SI0Al) 1 COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: _ SiA36c-6 y��MtbC.:.` ADDRESS: /"7 41416 a ill A LC►A4Z L7 ' " L-N PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): j:/EVEL,7Fiv7 ;t T PLAN CITY:!fir ye Rik)0 Ai ZIP: 9 �a7 4. EXISTING ZONING: CITY OF REN T ON ING R-8 SEP 2 7 2000 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 3(00_ '.zZ- 506 CA �ter. _ PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ,;a'liCE VE/) PE.RSON`< iigg >< > << > cl SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: J j yr1 FLAN 68 xJ 76, 452_ 5c2 1=r COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: 17 L ./( Y►1 a LGA2D Coves jiu IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? (1,65 , zo me 2 \ CITY: ivo-- V 6.-R_90,IL) ZIP: cy a 7 l/it I IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA?��// i. `TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: /`10 \.3�0' ifZZ-505.6 NAn11Iu RC�&''+Ai�%'�'k J CIS I.Ol�t<0 �P:E�OP� < <; '.. <, ; :.:,: :> . . ..>::.:;::>«::>::>::>::><:<:»::>::>: R"C. ... Attach..se � .::.:sh.ee' :.t :. . ;�/:'•;;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:;;;;;.:.:'.;:.;:.;:.;:..:::.. _....,.;;:.>::oi;•::�:�:4:0:�:�:::�ii:�:�::�::::•:..::c::..:.��::::i.::o:o::•sa:�:::�>:;.:::�::o:.>::<M:.:_z. � :::: :::.::•:�� :::: : ::: :o:�#:•:;::::::::::�:::::::::::.�::::.:.:::: 5 -E .44:1-77-AC-14E'D • > T ::: : >{ ..> PPLICA,::I:' , 0FEE, ,;; <;,:> mim:<<>'`'' <<< '``>€<< < > >>«> imo `: :'a 1 a. tion ha:::>::::::::::::::<:::»::::»::::>::>::::»::::::;::::::......... .he..�... l ..a . .L.ca. . ....t.. .es..t.. v.g . .I:.::::Cit. .....`C. .tw .d.gt ..o..w es . .......... ......................... _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ — SHORT PLAT $_ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ X PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 220 ' _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ _ FINAL PLAT $__ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ . . (NO.-CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: — SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ aD(� REVISION $ I, (Print Name)JA/v/ /�,C /OI EA.1,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Nthe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and Aworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and I, " _ / _ o,.v1_—, r. ' for he State of Le C & residing at ( • e of Owner/Rep , 'U�` " ®`R'.e�`,..,�a M ', ,on thee 1 day of • �. S �f1 T f :a '� A-- 2000. U ,�;•.. uii • _.i.: use:.` 1. J� (Signature of Owner' i g..l? "�'�-)a `/ /_ _ia JUNE.,3, ••6i - (Signature of N'f ary Public) M ;>:MARILY N.. y� � :.: ::.::. :::.is•s.:i.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:::.i:iii: }i:':.::.ii::.:l::is ::;i:::;:Y:;!; ::'�::::::ii:.::::i�::i::.i.:i. :':::'i:::: :':: :::::��::::'..:::':::...i:::� • :i:: iii: :iiiiijiii:::i':i:::::':i::::i :�::'::C: ' :'ii:iiiiii::i:i:::iX::::?:::}::::}�::::...:::: :::: :::Ci:i:•:�::ii :::ii :::: ::i::i:iii':::i::i::::iF:i::........ ....... ...::. •: :: :. v ::. : ::::.�:::::::in:i::..:.:::::::: :iiiig::•ii:::-:ii::•.•:iiiiii.•: 'is se #ioa fob eo ie d S :.i:.;:.;:.;: ::;.i:.::'::.;..: i:.;:.;:.i:.i:.;:.i:.i:.i.i:.i:.;i:.i:.i:.i:.i..i: .i'.;'.i:;;.;:;.;.:.;: ,'t'#�..:. .:. .:.>:»»i:'.>;::i»>.'.:<:;:.;.i:.i.i:.;:.:.:.;:... .:.i:...>:.;>;:>.ii:.i::. :<. . e.. . m .. #e. b..::G.i# ;>. #a..x::> :::>::>::>::>::>::>»::»::>:':'.;ii:.i:.;:.;:.i.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.;:.ii:.:.;:..; <:.i:.i:.i:<:«:::>::>::>: .......... ::i!:::::.::.: ... t. File:Number ::: .::.::::m:]: .ii4,:::.:A. 4.4: .::::.:. S..ni!i:C.AF:i :::::CAP.U.. PA:::::CU.:A.:::CU;ptiii:E.CEigi.4:Ai:....::::ii ::»::>:::::>::>::;:i:..i..: ...:.::.: ....:.:.: .,.... .i:'::.:..i....;:.i:.i...:..i....,..:...i:. :::.i:.i:.i.:. :...i.i . ....,,:.. .i::'.; i..,.,..:..i:.;"'.:; . ::: :.: .::.: : .i:.i,.:-:.:. :;::;'.i: .i'.is. .;::. .i::;::::.::.:> :.:>:: :i:::;::.::::i:: ::�:.:i::::i: �::: � 4 :::::. ...0..:::::.. ::+: �:::F., ..':.a..::i: ....... .:.: :}i:.i:.i i .::.:.::•. :+ .i::.i ii :Y :vi:^: .H •i:.:::. .iiiii . .:::.::.::.::.:MHP::: .�.E�.(1D.:: I��::PP::R.:::..t�1/M.P.:: .SA..A.....SA..f�.....SH�t.:.�1.:...SHI?l.i:H:::.::SP<.i:SM.i:::<S1Vl�i;'.i::'1.F'iii>�l::A::<.i:V;:B. :�l.;�i>i;;W:.:::: :;. ::E r: ,,,mi>»» > s ' > > ':+::x':-::.,UP:OS :.ir.::. ':`:<•:•:.>OV.:..<:i:.:::::', > >:: :��: <:; <><? '>'<>< ><: <<<' > > > >: :.i:.i:.iiii:.;:.;:. :.i.i:.i:.i:.iii:.i:.;: .....TbTA ;:P..OSTAGE.PROUI.D.E.D.....$....... ..... ... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 CITY QF RENTON :""'." DEVELOPMENTSERVICES;DIVISIOIN '".. • AFFIDAVIT OF" INSTALLA • TION OF PUBLIC:INFORMATION SIGN(S,) • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) • Ci , rS C. ot.56J 91-1 , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 2 1 day of -.5-��'t or,eWL-, 20 c O , I installed public information • sign(s)and plastic flyer box on the property located at 2.2 3 a /lp e5. P..4'1 for the following project: ?1lE 1f+14- S P.LoT Project name Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an"X"to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s)was/were constructed and installed in locations in • conformance with the requirements of pter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. Iler Signature • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this a7 day of � d X&t-, 2006 . � 0 C? .%ditsi NOTARY PUBLIC in a for the State of Win ton, `�� CY iAE��iwa IwoOHEFF g �� " NOTARY PUBLIC _ residing at -� .z . •` i STATE OF WASHINGTON • My commission expires on . • .:kiISSION SIRES .. R T,)y" . ,2®.-- KAMCHEFF A131361MENT EXPIRES:6-2€i 03 12 5. Responsibility for Installation, Maintenance and Removal: The applicant shall be solely responsible for the construction, installation, maintenance and removal of the sign(s) and the associated costs. The applicant must install the sign(s) within one week of the date of application and provide the Development Services Division with a notarized "Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign(s)" in order for the application to be considered complete. The applicant is required to maintain the notice board in good'condition until the final City action on the proposal. The sign(s) must be removed within a week following the end of the appeal period after the final Council or Examiner decision. If the sign is removed prior to the final action of the Council or Examiner, the applicant is responsible for immediate replacement of the sign. 6. Responsibility for Update of Sign and Installation of Notices of Environmental Determination and Public Hearings: Once the basic sign, laminated site plan, and plastic case have been installed by the applicant, the Development Services Division will post a laminated notice of the project's acceptance at the site as well as fill the plastic case with loose copies of the same notice. The Development Services Division will subsequently be responsible for posting any environmental determination, notice of hearing, and final decision. Several local companies that provide laminating services are Graphics Laminating (425- 251-3583), Highland Packaging Center (425-226-7573), and Kinko's Copies (206-244- 8884). 7. Return of the Plastic Flyer Case to the Development Services Division: The plastic case must be returned to the Development Services Division (6th Floor) prior to plat recording. • ::•%f{.:..:. r,:i:;}'.v+i:Y�ft{•r:t:0�'4%$?\vJ?i::{>+.;f:,;..vv\\'':f4•���?�`F.i?i:>i:t{j{'i:>:+S'v '+L^'•riti+i {. •:fvt.. }ItC :{ .,,;;la :tt,,. +.}L t::.:{t'rat?.C+•.::?.,.,Y ..rr ab?.•`: iifT:.:yr :�6•`'ht:RS,"y f;?y,.:3 .y.;{y.wS.S.,f.,..,}}:'d;t;iS•w,r.;NS+::a•4•;r•t•:•+r•: >•??•}:;•:?L+•:oxu•:<:rar• r:/.ivi :. ,;.inIAv .r . Y. ,: y., ..:.;.u.:. 4r'i:`•4a:r:Z:x'• '.t,.. A ..:r...,...... ; .•t}.t•^i:.u,.tY•..:t{+ixtrf.;:.., M1.\{,.a.,;0 M1 n?f•S�.l.y{:C::r•' ,i:; '::' .;.. ��v [s,r a., F:t{S f:•.}::}•. f�}' .<+C`y #•.Tr.:,',•f•; a,/ak :#a# 0•, # �5..< SS:y.•: ',:5:•: r +}S• �uyr.:\,•rif�r'',.''.�ajr, ^�?v`r n�;7N: ::u.f4 - ,?. } .•.�•;`•,'A:.i°`7�• {:}t tfcc,.. s.v 'ft%.yf3 f.•�Jtf Yt: a.F k:: Ft a:., r ,I.•.r +Y ::v:k: w: "SF•'��+:.'.:�.ah2'•4•.. +'::±kr. : O',.,� { .:...s,>.u•�\.:PF. .?.,.,.rx..:..•. <otc, :a•2�+:}r?'•3ii.t �. :Y.•.,: ,i,NtS, S C;: i'C:}.<:SStb.r..'r.•,,�t.y*E°L?.:S;k#: '•^LJ ?aZit�:r. f \:f5:r...k S`• wc'.t•?�`„�•::,: t• ..:. y�i `^t {,� fri...} 'f ::. �•t.n n. .t, •:!:���•.h�.;t`..�fM1� c}{.+...}....,:x::, :a.•�. ..r...l:,.,Y:4S. ..r:7�.}.E..:vr:SJx::...<ary,;{•,,,�;.Lr ..\."'?'.:So- .,4'•:.., �'ytJ'`d,}}�N{r\,r:�v � {�Fa`k;:;:< rA'J ^^n 4X�` .;��; •+If:S�vt+:iai::< '•l}�i`:ri'+'• y?.,y,;li • ff::: '�;.}',�•,•r t rY:,:\ri ':: }{••; ^y, ' 4...:I�'f,•+r+rr t` is}:�4 +• au 7 ;'• <} ``.�1� .: �:( '}r• f}'.<: . .a.y,y . : kli PN ''A..EfivI.GE < tfIVON; \r :t.. : }{�< }f#r.F•f;..y�•' '+: ik{.�v,,:}}}:4} .t'. 4�f •'',`'\,;'{.':>:ff•}ter}+;{+,fJ',%%,C\,',+Xif{..�},+r $fy>':�A'Yr' Fr. :?rr : ..y EEC ,..c.� .v.{}.q, y,+$y +{,}�• i.'::/ � i.:i :.:,•�v.+�, ,�, � :� ',•f`', �?. i..:.�s:. y?kt?fa.:•;{y.?r.•ytS.tSn�,L,s:.y?..}:.af.�,r�.,r 's.}:.. :s?hnV.f\.•?3;��??;;..;:;�6F•?,�},r:;�: '•+.' •r}`'a� s 't{i2o-:\ �+x• k•..o } �{ '�a\f::.,;;a,,,:.g3c:'.'a.a,,:#ti t, t: h . rjr\�x' ••.,•`cC�',`�+.w1 a r ,o-'' 1 , a':`< r.a .f:}r tr•,.: yes, F .+t?f, }}S.Ti�S 3 f. \ +,N:.; N. r+.. r{�? r •:}.:p t},.:itvv. ,ah:'• :.:•�C:,:• — '.3;�n£S#�•yf.'k �•�'� +.; �` xt tdL.va y�YE,., #f z . '�. 3f ..}}•Si{,vy .,: dY�:55'lc..�. :,\t`�`� ,?,�}. :��� :.%�•: 4:$•.,`{}C'f aY;v`\\,.:f}:_ }EN ..: t:.r.1 ,, . u �AIBECKL1$T Jf ::i?;} yyt r y fir. 'i`.:'S•:N:?+t•:•:F-?. ..•.�3i•. a::. +y}x?ar}:•?i:::;,Cx'c•}x::x:4;�r:�iw::::.::,.:•. L.v.....:�...v,.un�.::.,4:.....:.tt•::.:r•}:»ch::..v.;a::3'tty,...: :i}::',`•',?,'•;4v,•C•.if,?:•,•+•s:�:��. SE? 2 d 2��4� .PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: �Gti The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared. for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency Identify Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can • be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental.. checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help `describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: • Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project,"_"applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. . • ' 1 Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,If applicable: J A a 4?u t1W S Z 4 • 2. Name of applicant:JiM. JA46 i.,LE (i111 11 0v•S Ai) 3. .._Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 17'1 m,4e-6,1-e."0 Goo& L.J rn T vER mo . cv A g-'14 4. Date checklist prepared: • //-OD 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Pi,4r i,A p ,a&"i+oc 6 N 74e, r3 1 4/57-41_,L.. gb Sri yivp,01/44, , sue,, ® ? 2'o 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. C cw677e G,7`/d.V 63i //L‘GE. TAp 1 L cr 1-16=vrie S 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Mud 1 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Na 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. e9i!/‘Tie,4 tid N 3'e/G2)/4 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. 41 /.7e f'" /3 /2 L /4/)o i/ /.l'o64E M/ 41 1074s 2 . Envtronma,tal ClaaWht 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if ' . reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 2,23 Z ec/� st�-*AL 5.77 g4'4/70/0 ec/A- q B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flatIlling)hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, ' other • 7/- S/To S�os0 5 b. What Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 's' 5.1orPe ,(!, • -7-ht Ski/ e,g d) ,z oc.., /Z g 1 7E GL.., 5 t F/ze, dc„, sT c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 5eP/4-5 /R/ rA‹ .4/2s p t fifer v'.s<sLc Sn.v D t7. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Nt9 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. � //7iicte. ,11 rnetbu 7` c ..G1• 4 G €A D'a)6 ti<LL ✓e-e_riiZ •®be- 7`/ S i2eswr .4 `BRA/v46 Cep,/Sregie /o f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. 42coS)c),er Zip a./Acct.- /00- i:Sc4405 m.E&P /6 "le 1 nG _Gott -L '►7a.,i/N46, A-ovt&4 L jell LL AfS D • 7V avAiPiro C e0PO.S Vradzi A/6 6,0N S76eetd.T70 gt. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 490,uy- a® fAite is 2'% a1iT /Ptief ‘15 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: S -e• f f°1'o t> ce471,0 4. /4/ d.v.s etic7`/oA) 07/t amt-/aAJ ,04107 3 ErMroewmidd Cheeldid • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, • odors,Industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If - any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. eRl44 46fitoc/41sJ) /0 /T14 6"/ b L �8.0►" i L b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: 3. WATER a. Surface Water. 1) Is there anyurface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. VON E 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. xJc 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. itiew 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 4 Environmental Checidid b. Ground Water 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give generaldescription, purpose, and approximate quantities If known. - •// 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. ; U6, • • c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so,describe. Ra m c'fF Ro An. s-r7 Lr,e c 0i/ea-T, • To e,sA 4 •-r'7 ArTe-J ( w. u4 4 Z /LsA Co ff'e 1' 5Tb e' a c-v ATe . a.,. l� C Low w6 r bit/ IV 6 .4t'4 S'r- .v aw .6 Toirn,. 5 w s C.-o.v -- 7�es 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. E'4-".-/-1 $•rotaI SFsw�a Fs-' t d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: ,£mPcaesuc .afosfp,c) ed?Ar or c,ca : \t N ?1-Acb Pc.-ad .v Cr, QOA.)5`71e14 c.f-ro.0 c?.c,57J'+u c-d'-f a.v re, , a QX.) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X. deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other V evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 7.-72,0- 5 aJ- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.// d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: '/ .�f( O i-P atPfi- Lt$L� PAtivi / AtT tis6.- 1,07r F7 1 / '51r .&f9.us itd 'Od(A . Environmental Checklist 6. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: • Birds: hawk,heron, eagle,. ngbirds they Mammals:deer, bear, elk,beaver,other Fish: bass,salmon,trout, herring,shellfish, other b. , List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain An, d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NA7fURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. --,A A/ doC As4eadz7S b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. O c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If any: i4/9/V‘ Env mnmened Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist In the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment,operation,other)? -- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:.traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. //ep/wi C?,'Js7 as tikiodo eQk l�a��•v? "-Tat a I#., a If r-&.z a--7-i6�v 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Cjrt/tuLi`ic�a.J Tr) • T'(A-7-V0� GZ�PoP�T. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? T40 p t i L i.r 6c 1 TI-j E �i7 hV A Si.I G45- 14-A4 t i Ki El 6 /4 8oa2 14001 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. ti:4d42-S " ,pa+ -8u1Laieoevs d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? �LL. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? .5./4)6 die- ir---41-nA g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Al? i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 35 7 ' r Environmental Checklist • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 2 �asafp L J k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /t/OAJ I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Q' at& 14'toAlA _ehurTS b. Approximately how many.units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 2- / Qsda . �', , c, Be- z)E'.P",a LiT �u /L L Re-c� � �.-r-M- N�u' C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: GL/o.v '10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not uicluding antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. /2 ,c a6,J Go b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstrutted? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 8 Environmental cheddid c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? idONa. - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: . 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the immediate vicinity? NE.420 91)/34 L/cg.r✓.r 7g'v FAac.eS A-cv l c9 41- 17, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunitiefto be provided by the project or applicant, if any: //bN.0 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation// registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • �l 0 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural� importance known to be on or next to the site. nova c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 114 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify.public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /1/� 74/1 r r$ A. ge-Jd72,-,vy'i,�� 7— ��dZ(1 d 6 i-r- b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 7-'4)0A/it.? 71-049 ✓2,4,C/;h1 per ' 40."`c- ,d a� m y Gv ;`E'� � v�.J 4d�! P-C En*onmeem Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or _ private? A Pr/�w 5`�e—� IV/l c CIVA9 r910- '0 -, $,0az. d--Ma ,Jm-ue 4e J- e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. ilk _.._ • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. . I/O g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: AM -' 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 74744:..3 -- au -o m-cr, wog 5-,,u‘L-45 ,4ovt 11-'i b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utill cps . urren -' - I e at the site: atural ga (fi r, -fuse L lepho , -- septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. -.X. ,v.y,/o4) d F At c co at e ,dbb C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ...e,-;,, - D ' dim i �/ �`'49leRS Name Print : ).;rn AtAIiIp.tl Date: IX' /1--0v 10 • Environmertbal Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS { ::•0: •::r::•:::::... ...t�tt ...:fie..::}W -:NO.O. 'iltIuf ::.::decl ivr>ORO 1�M :: !� 4 r:}}i$::}.:}::.4:.v:::..;.{.:<}�-0�i+G'�'�i�:•:4$:i}:{C}:FiY:}rJ%T+:u.:::4,:•.:�:...+.t•}.,..: ..�.,y, .. ..:i::.�... .::Y�.f'h�.y.Il.YF.Pr.� r�lNi�'::4�....j .;.;:T: .-''h,•f..y..,:$}:::::::<'::iirS.>;.fiy.•rci}}, .nS::.��.i;::::•}::?•: •`:h'�<f�v:;::r.}:',::�;,T;!fir.:: ;�;.{.}?..�:6 .��{ f?i�l .. ... ...b .ed.td.�'ilt:0iit>fhe�:::�h` 5:foz''ptb�et�:Bdldct5�� :: �:�rih:; :<::<k���:•��:;}�'� ;��> :� kt<: , Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them In conjunction with the list of the elements of the.environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and In general terms. • 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water emissions to air production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? Proposed,measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proppsal be likely to affect plants, animals,fish, or marine life? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 11 .e Environmental Checklid 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 8I98 12 P l • Jacque's 24t St Plat Construction Mitigation Plan The following is a construction mitigation plan for the infrastructure associated with the Jacque's 24th St Plat: The proposed construction may begin as soon as the plat is approved,summer of 2001,and will continue for about 6 months once started. The hours of operation will be per the City of Renton ordinance covering construction work in residential neighborhoods. Hauling will primarily be done from the existing NE 24th St to Aberdeen Ave.NE.,then to NE 271 St to Kennewick PL NE and then to I-405. Very little material will need to be hauled onto or off of the site.Excavation will be limited to the areas of the street and utility areas.Any Dirt or mud coming from the site will be cleaned by sweeping and or flushing depending on what is appropriate at the time.Dust will be kept to a minimum by watering if needed.Excavated areas will be protected per the King County SWM manual as adopted by the City of Renton. A traffic control plan will be addressed at the time of the construction permits. N � Gf;`O` �js5 ' September 14,2000 City of Renton Development Services Division Elizabeth Higgins,Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton Wa.98055 Subject:Jacques 24th Street Plat application,2232 NE 24th St.Renton Wa. Dear Ms.Higgins: This letter outlines the application for the Jacques 24t Street Plat at 2232 NE 24th St.Renton Wa.The proposal is to subdivide an existing 1.76 acre parcel with two single family residences and various out buildings into 11 residential lots.Both residences and out buildings will be removed. The current zoning of the site and surrounding area is R-8.The current use of the site is for two single family residences. Street improvements consisting of street paving exist along NE 24th Street. There are no steep slopes,water bodies or wetlands on the site.The site slopes gently from east to west. The soils are sandy and free draining.The drainage from existing improvements infiltrates into the soil. The owner proposes to subdivide the property into 11 lots suitable for construction of single family houses. Access will be from NE 24th St and a new city street which will be constructed to serve the new lots.Two lots will be served using a shared driveway. A half street and half cul-de-sac will be constructed per the cities street standards.All street improvements consisting of,curb and gutter,sidewalks,street lighting,water lines and fire hydrants,sanitary and storm sewers,and street paving will be installed on the new half street and on NE 24th St. Some structural fill materials will be imported to construct the new half street.A small amount of material will be disturbed on the site for utility construction and other plat improvements. Very few trees will be removed,only those in the area of the street and utility improvements. The right of way for the new half street will be dedicated to the city upon recording of the final plat. The proposed lots range in size from 4550 square feet to 8505 square feet.The parcel size is 76,482 square feet gross and 60,299 square feet net.R-8 zoning allowing 8 units per net acre will allow 11.05 units on the site. 11 units are being proposed. We appreciate the city's review and approval of this application for an eight lot subdivision.If you have any questions please contact me at 360-422-5056. r Ni :�p�t;-ti i PLc.N�IN3 S ly, CITY OF RENTON (�' C1.0"--t---- JaniesEP 2 7 2[Gf C.Hanson L a t41111 • • • 4 .2000 • �.`uINUltf Q MEMORANDUM PATE: 3/ 13106 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director 0rV • SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Jetio ares 214+r41,5-E . P J�+ LOCATION: 7-23 2. ni__ PREAPP NO. 00 -3o A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 2•0° , Thursday, Pr I I (p I WOO , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to I i 7_aln. h 3 5\ r\5 at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. ipe4/14,40A .. DEV C1T�YPOF RENT• NG MAY/4,7 nicee-&-; 34-g/Ozi CE1VED 26 0 �nF\110,1P\©N 1NG 054 G1T'r C1 SEP 21 Preapp2 V1 (TY O CITY OF RENTON �A,p � FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM .wNTp . • DATE: March 16, 2000 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT:. Preliminary Comments for Jacques 24th Street Plat • 1 . The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. For dwellings.over 3,600 square feet minimum fire flow is 1 ,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300-feet is required. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $488 per new lot. This fee is payable prior to recording of the plat. 3. Fire access road. is required to be a full 90-foot diameter cul-de-sac per city ordinance which states dead end roads over 300-feet long require a full cul-de- sac. .The dead end road is measured from Northeast 24th Street. CT:ct Jake24 • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 28,2000 TO: ELIZABETH HIGGINS(� FROM: NEIL WATTS ON-) SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATION REVIEW JACQUES 241H STREET SHORT PLAT I have reviewed the above listed project, and have the following comments. GENERAL LAYOUT The proposed combination of public and private streets does not waive the distance requirements for establishing requirements for dead end street systems. The distance from NE 24th Street to rear parcels is approximately 520 feet. This will require a half cul-de-sac dedication, as well as sprinklering of the back parcels. We also cannot support the use of private streets for this property. The adjacent parcel to the east is the same size and shape as this parcel, and can be subdivided in a similar fashion at a later date. This could result in the creation of multiple private streets serving up to 12 parcels, instead of providing access to all the new lots from a common public street. There are legitimate concerns about the use private streets. It is our position that private street are appropriate in limited situations, but may not be suitable for serving a larger number of lots. There are several reasons for this limitation of parcels served by a private street: • Difficulty of shared maintenance by private property owners • Lack of available on-street parking • Lack of sidewalks • Restricted emergency access - It is our recommendation that the short plat be revised to meet City code requirements for half street improvements (see attached), with no private street. The allowed density for this configuration would permit a maximum of ten parcels. SEWER • There is an existing 8" sewer main in NE 24th Street adjacent to the proposed short plat. 1. .• MARCH 28, 2000 PAGE 2 • An 8" sewer main extension will be required to serve the proposed new. • Separate side sewers will be required for each parcel (no dual side sewers).. The minimum slope for the side sewers shall be 2%. - 0 • Sewer System Development Charges of$585 per new single family parcel will be required for this short plat. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary plat. WATER • There is an existing 12" water line in NE 24th St. The proposed plat is located in the 320 water pressure zone, and is within Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • An 8" water main extension through the site will be required within the plat to serve the new parcels. • Fire hydrants will be required to current City standards within 300 feet of all proposed building sites for the new parcels. • Water System Development Charges of$850 per new single family parcel will be required for this plat. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary short plat. DRAINAGE • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report including detention and water quality treatment will be required for preliminary plat submittal. • Water quality provisions are not included on the plan. It is our recommendation that the water quality treatment requirements be met by a wetvault or other underground method, rather than providing a bioswale in the yards of the new parcels. It is our experience that bioswales are viewed as a nuisance by the new residents, especially with the smaller urban lot sizes. • Surface Water System Development Charges of $385 per new single family parcel will be required for this plat. This fee will not be required if the lots are served by infiltration. This fee must be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit for the preliminary short plat. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES • Due to concerns for possible erosion and sedimentation problems from construction activities on the site, we recommend the following conditions for this plat: 1. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the downslope perimeter of the area that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated, and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual, Appendix D. MARCH 28, 2000 PAGE 3 This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 2. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and route the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction or drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in Section 4.4.1 of the SWDM. Temporary.pipe systems can also be used to convey stormwater across the site. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 3. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. 4. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer or record to the public works inspector for the preliminary plat construction. STREET IMPROVEMENTS • Frontage improvements will be required along NE 24th Street adjacent to parcel. The Board of Public Works may not support deferral of street improvements. • As discussed in the General Layout section, we are recommending the plat be developed with a half street improvement, including the dedication of half of a cul-de-sac. Per the City code, the turnaround can be provided by construction of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. • All new electrical, phone and cable services to the short plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. • • Traffic mitigation fees of$75 per net new average daily trip ($716.25 per lot) will be required prior to recording of the plat. Fire mitigation and Parks mitigation fees must also be paid prior to recording of the short plat. GENERAL • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a registered Civil Engineer. The construction permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,00 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of this fee must be paid upon application for construction permits (preliminary plat improvements) and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. . . .• 4110 . •4 . . .,• / • 1110 • • • • • • • c.•47) IVO 7 h 0 • C _DANCE NO. 4521 1 . Will meet the objectives and safety, function, environmental _ t :.;; protection and maintainability intended by the requirements of this Ordinance, based upon sound engineering judgment. 2 . Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. C. Half 'Street Improvements: Half street improvements may be allowed for a residential access street by the Administrator or her/his designee when it is determined that the adjacent parcel of property has the potential for future development and dedication of the right-of-way necessary for the completion of the street right- of-way. The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum of thirty-five feet (35 ' ) with twenty-eight feet paved (2.8 ' ) . . A curb and a six foot (6 ' ) sidewalk shall be installed on the development side of the street. If the street will require a cul-de-sac, then the right-of-way for the half of the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated, with installation of a temporary hammerhead turnaround. The property shall also dedicate easements to the City for street lighting and fire hydrants . Additional easements shall be provided for the franchise utilities outside of the dedicated right-of-way. When the adjacent parcel is platted or developed, an additional fifteen feet (15 ' ) of , right-of-way shall be dedicated from the developing property. The pavement shall then be widened to thirty-two feet (32 ' ) in total width, and a curb and six foot (6 ' ) wide sidewalk shall be installed on the developing side of the 4 '\street. If ,the street is a dead-end street requiring a cul-de-sac, )then the developing parcel shall - dedicate the remainder of the • right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and construct the final complete cul-de-sac, including curb and sidewalk improvements . D. Reduced Right-of-Way Dedication Requirements for Platting: The Department may approve a reduction in the required right-of-way. width for residential access streets for new streets within a short plat or subdivision to forty-two feet (42 ' ) when the extra area from the reduction is used for the creation of an additional lot(s) which could not be platted without the reduction; or when the platting with the required right-of-way width results in the creation of lots with less than one hundred feet (100 ' ) in depth. The Department may require additional easements be provided for the franchise utilities outside of the dedicated right-of-way when such a right-of-way reduction. is approved. In no case shall .a reduction in the required right-of-way width be approved unless it is shown that there will be no detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare if the right-of-way width is reduced, and that the full right-of-way width is not needed for current or future development. 4-34-12 : DEFERRAL: • A. Deferral and Security: If a developer wishes to defer certain street improvements listed in this ordinance until after obtaining •a certificate of occupancy for any structures, or in the case of )lats, final plat approval, then written application shall be made the Board of Public Works. Upon approval by the Board of Public 12 1. • fY1 FIRE ARTIJS ACCES 4AD S • : ' : , .ttYt�t'•"y • rF r • fir. ,: W w z" s • �xz'� is :ti z } . zz;•":.yi �2D- ..... ,..zoad :c t s 1__ :aN wv.} ,�� ...x } ."Kle:rwF-:^� r� ¢ :n::-ft �x.'� : 9 0-F E E T I� xiz%r `~k�c` �ii:` 'szki, :#?p ow ,xr N 4 : . n n:,.. : , «,.n.t,,..,nx ::: :•:: .... w ' }' 't to ?c¢ c;^:a'cii?,c¢"',tc,•gy>}»r .`x`xr�c:i<,:':r::':.y}', ...:•xr :•:t:wi3}:w• t34 ::3a�#.'.. :.c:��••h�� • c� • TURNING •J`' ,w . RADIUS m m • 25—FEET INSIDE ^. ": • 45—FEET OUTSIDE ; r4• K N • 20—FEET • • • 55—FEET {— K } • Wx,��^�`�z.ti,tµ :x i ::<x .:,.^.•,•""':,�.%;.tn,; :ez > •<s z,`?:':>"',:: .i`z•}pie:.. z , ; waz z%.. „„"y2: i ^t f 2x ,...`xg :%.,.,•�>....:0;x:,,,:."',,,q O is .;tia:a�3Gy:¢..�,}:„;;i;. , tk?;;4.a.M.¢... .Y'•`�` `'`:^:,¢ •,... ..-a,,, ,„ t• 41/41;3-AY ':Y""'�. •4 W ''atN y. `1. }x .xA^,^t:i n,{:t$ ^jiTt*r:.':xxx^ ge iKi•':�k¢. : . H xf .$vw . r, C�'fi:.Jx• :, ve...�..zt..... : .:wa`w.z.,i.;• ••:: xu 't}:xv^µ4.•:,:mk...J::n:. ::T :y-,�.:w.c`2;�•`. ` ,.nx}• `:J >.•}:t.`,..}`„"�:;.zz�,� �zx;^-.��^Cu�..v�;s;.�}h¢.g iwzzt:n`�•.vt��;a;'�•-•,� �' xp'' #}�.... k�?;.t.<,,. z^ y�.-.z,. :¢.t¢,tJi¢iz•'�ixt v, ,�•¢�, a.,:t.^,,;�.�`,:nazc�::�xi.M::`xn^.:::•":z�;x;'•t.�'�;,�` ,�•�,`,z„�,.w.::¢n.••:c�. . .N as } :;^ :i ',,e;%' ,xn:"•'•••.•i'•*.::-:•"'axx.�;'N"¢v ,¢::, <;••. 3• sy .: z �•z ea, t ::.< i� .•; .... '�.�z>.rtz�:t�;v .�z� •�z�•��.'�. yz� `� :���„�•ysAv.tom•.• a• t' :,.�..,. �••.,•.a� r PI ;f4-, zS`z<z` �?azZz`>.:Kv,�.ta w} ;: tz:ea''^'' lim.:.^.kNn.`•N'.��•'•.'�v'^-�te ...41 v}.�: z}'.•.` ;..^z:;a� n. yrj :?:ex�%r"..3`��t. �`}+ C�'c�Gv.x^•A,xlia.i�;.afx.;�.:•;;f...au3¢t ;,,.•;:x.••:;:.t?,.:�eft h:�`•.''�.....x:,:`.:���` `�.�o.:. . .•zxx x zx. .x . FEET V TURNING A m RADIUS } • x; • 25-FEET INSIDE µs EL 45—FEET OUTSIDE A wK^x:.t; • K >I 20—FEET • • . �t CURB • x •"ft`• cN .:..^ pia. .• ; $r. :x r >•::: ' yr 1 ' ;.: xL ^a,,,^ :tY -•aim": `w' W .x. t'. �•:>`n'w:a'.G�ytv:�;�'}`h.rxw:.?{�'}iJZ.+•�+�.•.,�� i} fr.:�••p,}. �„ �� ' r. zip:. x rtz �o-xa�a �,$zic zz,} z' Fn?a> o2, v •a sr. s a '� • .. • :4:tftt::" V;17.(1::V V. as 53: F' . `W.t wf" { } t . ..: v 'v\a: "ibjYv54:iay. .j Y�:'iti• • • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM • • DATE: April 6, 2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-30 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425)430-7382 SUBJECT: Jacques .11-Lot Preliminary Plat Preapplication Comments Applicant: James C. Hanson Project Name: Jacques Preliminary Plat Project Address: NE 24th Street • General: We have completed a preliminary review of the preapplication materials for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the preapplication submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and on the City of Renton Codes in effect on the date of the review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code and the City of Renton Development Regulations. The Renton Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's office and the Renton Public Library. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of Renton City Hall. Project Proposal: The applicant has proposed subdividing, by means of the Preliminary Plat process, a 76,482 sf(1.76 acre) property into 11 lots suitable for detached single family houses. The property is located in Northeast Renton on NE 24th Street between Aberdeen Avenue NE and Edmonds Avenue NE. Access would be from NE 24th Street. 401 Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Preapplication Comments April 6, 2000 Page 2 Current Land Use: The proposed project site consists of one tax parcel. There are, apparently, two single family residences on the site that may be subject to demolition. There are primarily single family homes in the vicinity of the project. Land Use Permits Required: For subdivision of land into ten (10) or more lots, RMC 4-7-080 "Subdivision" guidelines apply. The proposed project will require Preliminary Plat and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) approval as the first stage followed by Final Plat approval (see Final Plat Approval section below), which requires a separate application. Preliminary Plat proposals are initially reviewed by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, then considered by the Environmental Review Committee. Following issuance of a SEPA Threshold Determination, the plat request is heard by the Hearing Examiner at a public_meeting. The decision and recommendations by the Hearing Examiner are forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The City Council adopts its own findings, conclusions, and recommendations and either approves or denies the proposed plat. Application fees are $2000 for the Preliminary Plat application and $200 (1/2 of the $400 environmental review fee if the improvements are less than $100,000) or$500 (1/2 of the $1,000 fee if the improvements are more than$100,000) for Environmental (SEPA) Review. Processing time for Preliminary Plat is approximately 16 weeks, if no appeals are filed. A complete Preliminary Plat application package is being provided to the project proponent with a copy of this memorandum. Zoning: The property is located in the Residential 8 (R-8) Zone. It is designated as Residential Single Family on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land ,Use map. Density: In the R-8 Zone, the minimum density is 5.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). The R-8 Zone permits residential development at densities up to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre, for lots larger than ',4 acre. Density calculations are based on net parcel size, excluding sensitive areas (such as wetlands and steep slope areas) and public rights-of-way. As of April 30. 2000. new criteria will be used to determine net density. Private access easements, serving three or more dwelling units, will also be deducted from the gross site area to determine net area for density calculation (see attachment). Minimum Lot Size: The minimum lot size in the R-8 Zone is 4500 s.f. It appears, from the information provided by the applicant, that this standard would be met. (Site data will be required on the formal application that lists individual lot sizes.) m Jacques 24th Street PreliminaryPlat � Preapplication Comments April 6, 2000 Page 3 Minimum Lot Width and Depth: The minimum lot width in this zone is 50' for interior lots and 60' for corner lots. Lots appear to meet these requirements. The minimum allowable lot depth is 65'. The conceptual plan raises the question of where the applicant intends to have the front yards on lots 1 and 6 through 11 and whether the plan, as currently proposed, is logical in that regard. Facing the street, however, means the lots may not meet the minimum required lot depth. Setbacks: The minimum setbacks in the R-8 Zone are: front 15' for houses and 20' for garages on streets created after September 1, 1995, and 20' if fronting on existing streets rear 20' side 5' (interior lots) and 15' (corner lots) Setback lines must be indicated by dashed lines on the site plan submitted for preliminary plat review, then removed prior to recording of the final plat. Building Height: Building heights in the R-8 Zone are limited to 2 stories and 30'. It cannot be determined from the information provided by the Applicant if this standard will be met. Building Coverage: The maximum building coverage is 35% of the total lot area. The maximum building coverage for lots 5,000 sf or less is 50%. Building footprints are not indicated on the conceptual plan. For purpose of considering the preliminary plat, building envelopes should be shown on the plat map. Parking: Off street parking must be provided for each lot, at a minimum of 2 spaces each. Access: Each lot must have access to a public street. The conceptual plan indicates that access will be from NE 24th Street and then a public half-street (see Plan Review comments). Sensitive Areas: There is no indication of sensitive areas on or in the near vicinity of the property. Typical Environmental Mitigation measures placed on Preliminary Plats include the required Fire Mitigation Fee ($488/new lot), Parks Mitigation Fee ($530.76/new lot), and Transportation Mitigation Fee (approximately$750/new lot). Typically, credit is given for existing single family residences. Jacques 24th Street Preliminary Plat Preapplication Comments April 6, 2000 Page 4 Final Plat Recording: The Final Plat must conform, with only minor modifications, to the Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat cannot be recorded until the required improvements are installed and approved, and a final drawing is prepared and accepted by the City. In addition, any conditions and/or fees must be met and/or paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat as applicable. A separate application packet is required. cc: James C. Hanson Jennifer Henning • MAR 1 4 2000 MEMORANDUM • DATE: 3113 ZOO TO: Long Range Planning .• • FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: TC4 Gt-u.c S 2-44*'^ 4St. LOCATION: Zz3Z h�. Zg9i. 54), 1- PREAPP NO: 00 - 30 • Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. • Please submit your written comments to Ei i2(Jl2. '55iAs no later than `J 1 4 l oo . Thank you. • We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the • • presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. 1 ra- LS OI:�Ic.NY�T(.� R 31O0r ri i'1 . .5u%JALtE FAr 'l,z. 1N/ r i•)zr Cz'1'V 2aclte-Ns it/C. PLf'N nic• OClVSir'r cALcu •/\;1o7'-1 1S cos2t -r Unioat. IrIL: I=�IS'�IIL� N l 7 O�r1N :`! C/"t LC'u "TM c- Cc.)o f . 1 l o L.1 LNV i Z ) IN+"'t c-DN,r)ri c.--)1 i j Tp i I-1c= N ► nvS17 p iN1 i i crnj /\12E A-NJ t c(eA reV To 13r?• [1"i"c.C.7cvc A1'rLtt_. 3o,7Oo0 , UNOts . 71}i: 1\1c:14 Dc'„v►7"IOn1 Pr2A V 67(7, AcX 3 5 t:iy.s tr'T�ov`t S 7',,!I N c;, 3 c.c.. moe...ce Oa c>2L-1 N C.. UNITS rinG O L'-o u c.reo f Marl. 1-1 1-6 ( Z a5•5 /'r6ZX I^I CJ L(_.v !Iv L. 1od-4.35 1-t . po2.0?05 0 DOI u 1 7 1 0V 1 S /177/ct. tE0 NO 0711er-- aLIC i LSSLt ) C 1) k-a.. 5 • aZlC. ebei &' N4 • PPP _' — iip ORDINANCE NO. .:t •=: ,. i. SECTION XLII. Section 4-11-030, Definitions C, of Chapter .11, Definiti"o`n ,. ,1 4 nh Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of z3 General :�r,. Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding the following y definition which reads as follows: CRITICAL HABITAT, OR CRITICAL WILDLIFE HABITAT: Habitat areas associated with threatened, endangered, critical, monitor, or priority species of plans or wildlife and which, if altered, could reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. See also RMC 4-3-050.B.5.b. SECTION XLIII. Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11, Defuutions, of Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by revising the following definitions to read as follows: DENSITY, NET: A calculation of the number of housing units and/or lots that would be allowed on a property after critical areas and public rights-of-way except alleys, and legally recordedL private access easements serving three or more dwelling units are subtracted from the gross area (gross acres minus streets and critical areas multiplied by allowable housing units per acre).. Required critical area buffers shall not be subtracted from gross acres for the purpose of net density calculations. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: Written permission after appropriate review for type of application from the appropriate decision-maker authorizing the division of a parcel of land, the construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure,utility,or any use or extension of the use of the land. SECTION XLIV. Section 4-11-050, Definitions E, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding the following definitions which read as follows: EASEMENT: A grant by the property owner of the use or protection of apiece of land by the public,corporation,or persons for specific purposes. EASEMENT, CONSERVATION: A easement held by the City, a public or non-profit entity approved by the City for the express purpose of protecting and conserving critical areas and their buffers in accordance with the provisions of the Renton Municipal Code. 122 V PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Company of Washington, Inc. �p �N\Np" CO cAIN11 J & J Construction 2509 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Jim Jacques Order No. : 412497 Your Ref. : Jacques Please find enclosed a copy of a Plat Certificate on the above referenced transaction, as requested. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you. Pacific Northwest Title Company of Washington, Inc. takes great pride in the service and customer satisfaction we are able to provide our customers. If we can answer any questions or provide further assistance, please feel free to call. Mike Sharkey Senior Title Officer Unit No. 12 215 Columbia Street A Seattle,WA 98104-1511 A (206) 622-1040 A Fax: (206) 343-1358 http://pnwt.com PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Mike Sharkey (mikesharkey@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Curtis Goodman (curtisgoodman@pnwt..com) Assistant Title Officer, Russell T. Lund (russelllund@pnwt.com) Unit No. 12 FAX No. (206)343-1330 Telephone Number (206) 343-1327 Jim Hanson Title Order No. 412497 17446 Mallard Cove Lane CERTIFICATE FOR Mt. Vernon, Washington 98274 FILING PROPOSED PLAT Your Ref. : Jacques PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A GENTLEMEN: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: The west half of Tract 223, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 4, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 82, in King County, Washington. IS VESTED IN: JAMES H. JACQUES, as his separate estate SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $ 17.20 TOTAL CHARGE: $217.20 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: September 1, 2000 at 8 :00 a.m. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. I trite _ A °- ha ey i Senior Title Office Unit No. 12 PLAT CERTIFICATE Schedule B Order No. 412497 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2 . Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. Order No. 412497 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Page 3 3. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: James H. Jacques, a single person TRUSTEE: Chicago Title Insurance Company, a corporation BENEFICIARY: Ernest L. Bozeman, a single person AMOUNT: $240,000.00 DATED: May 12, 2000 RECORDED: May 15, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 200000515000846 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. NOTE: A survey of the herein described property was recorded under King County Recording Number 7311150318, a copy of which is hereto attached. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Ronda Cochran Any inquires should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. tas CC: J & J Construction/Renton/Jim Jacques • 20000515000845 After recording return to: CHICAGO TITLE 092 ®® e5/15 a 31 35 Law Offices of Dan Kellogg KING c Tr, WA Suite 249, 15 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 E1752930 KIMs/�T , W 042 Oe PAGE 001 OF 001 SALE Well" se DOCUMENT TITLE: Statutory Warranty Deed REFERENCE NUMBER OF RELATED DOCUMENT: n/a GRANTOR(S) : Ernest L. Bozeman ADDITIONAL GRANTOR(S) ON PAGE: n/a GRANTEE(S) : James H. Jacques . .-., `; ADDITIONAL GRANTEE(S) ON PAGE:. n/a ` `- 4' ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: West 1/2 of Tract 223, C. D. o Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition, Div. No. 4 c ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S) : 1 1 ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL NUMBER(S) : 334390-0861-09 un c„ I 03- � STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ERNEST L. BOZEMAN, a single person, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to JAMES H. JACQUES, a single person, the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington: The West Half of Tract 223, C.D . Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 4, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 82, records of King County, Washington; Situate in King County, Washington. SUBJECT TO: (1) Release of damage agreement recorded under King County Recording No. 4993881; and (2) Second half 2000 general real estate taxes. DATED: May 1 o , 2000. 14Lt3cs-C.6,4AA.A. Ernest L. Bozeman 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ernest L. Bozeman is the person who appeared before me, and who signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. I/S DATED: May / ) , 2000. ,r• ... _ Notary Public in and for th • A, b t c of Washington, residing a '� ' My appointment expires: 1 D5.vR , ���/24/00:dk • an m 0 ►n 0 • C7 N 2 After recording return to: 111111111 Law Offices of Dan Kellogg 0000515000846 Suite 249, Evergreen Building CHICAGO TITLE DT 12 00 15 South Grady Way PAGE 001 OF 005 05/15/ 000 11: S Renton, WA 98055 KING COUNTY, UP DOCUMENT TITLE: DEED OF TRUST REFERENCE NUMBER OF RELATED DOCUMENT: GRANTOR(S) : James Jacques RIC II\I ADDITIONAL GRANTOR(S) ON PAGE: n/aO GRANTEE(S) : Ernest L. Bozeman I7_ ADDITIONAL GRANTEE(S) ON PAGE: n/a ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: West 1/2 of Tract 223, C. D. u3 Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition, Div. No. 4 -' ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S) : • 1 ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL NUMBER(S) : 334390-0861-09 r c DEED OF TRUST ` THIS DEED OF TRUST is made between JAMES H. JACQUES, a single o person, Grantor, whose address is 2509 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98056, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, cz Trustee, and ERNEST L. BOZEMAN, a single person, Beneficiary, whose address is 2232 N.E. 24th Street, Renton, WA 98056. WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the following described real property in King County, Washington: The West Half of Tract 223, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 4, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 82, records of King County, Washington; Situate in King County, Washington. which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with all tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof. This deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of Grantor herein contained, and payment of the sum of DEED OF TRUST PAGE - 1 Two Hundred FortY Thousand Dollars ($240,000.00) with interest, in accordance with the terms of a promissory note ("Note") of even date herewith payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: 1. To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; to complete any building., structure or improvement being built or about to be built thereon; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. 3. ' To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or other hazards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All policies shall be held by the Lo Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may ▪ approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary as its a' interest may appear and then to the Grantor. The amount collected o under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness c' hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance •- of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. 4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 5. To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured hereby and Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statute. 6. Should Grantor fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, liens, encumbrances or other DEED OF TRUST PAGE - 2 • charges against the property hereinabove described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so paid, with interest at the rate set forth in the note secured hereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion thereof as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be • applied to said obligation. 2. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its. due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 3. The Trustees shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4. Upon default by the Grantor in the payment of any up indebtedness secured hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become co o due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event, cn and upon the written request of the Beneficiary, the Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to the highest - bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at trustee's sale. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows: (1) to the expense of sale, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and Attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust; (3) the surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 5. The Trustee shall deliver to the Purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the Purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter. The Trustee's Deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive. evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchasers and encumbrances for value. DEED OF TRUST PAGE - 3 6. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. 7. In the event, of the death, incapacity or disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original trustee. The trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 8. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. LC 9. If the Property, or any part thereof, is sold, conveyed, - transferred, encumbered, or full possessory rights therein o transferred, or if a controlling interest in Grantor (if a o corporation) or a general partnership interest in Grantor (if a c' partnership) is sold, conveyed, transferred or encumbered, without the prior written consent of the Beneficiary, then Beneficiary may declare all sums secured by the Deed of Trust immediately due and o payable, or at its sole option it may so consent and may increase the interest rate of said loan to such rate as Beneficiary shall o request. Such increase in interest shall entitle Beneficiary to o increase monthly payments on the loan so as to retire the obligation within the original stipulated time. This provision shall apply to each and every sale, transfer, conveyance or encumbrance regardless of whether or not Beneficiary has consented or waived its rights, whether by action or non-action, in connection with any previous sale, transfer, conveyance or encumbrance, whether one or more. DATED: May %2 1 , 2000. I{.tnnOA IA. ` • .1� J&nes H. JO.ue' DEED OF TRUST PAGE - 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that James H. Jacques is the person who appeared before me, and who signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and ' voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: May �s , 2000. 444 No ary Public in and for f• of Washington, residing a-1-'•'�*[ _- Carolann Hughes ,, /,�} ue00 My appointment expires: 8/ < 21 Of wI a A� D5.22:60:04/24/00:dk Lo CO C4 DEED OF TRUST PAGE - 5 ?'7'f•t•:.:;,•,!••••••!•,...........:'': :•'•-='!,-1.",;•:fp;--.V.,,:.'''•'3.-'44..... 7--Y.••,-,-.,!.:.,...r....7;,•-,•,-.1.:,- -. ..••. .1".n-,,i•„•:.-,'.....Ji• .-'..: ••'•..:-......1.....,Y,47:.,.,..••• ''''-, kg,c.Z.',...: .......1' C'f.i.,.... ...VOW 4 r:,',• "' ' -*.,^.-..:•:4.,c-':,........:., .0... .4, •....A.r.c.••• ' ' =7.?'..,,( , ,:•••,,,• ...._,,.::4=0,.. !..2:_lie.:'.....,. • , . atir':''..'-.... . • ::.7:44,,,,,".-•„„.:A./ .. iii- ' .....''';ittpitoo.:iii,ei::::64. .. . _ : i itii: • - ' :;••••'•:-I?-;•.- • - -7 •-, '-,-.1-"---*--itz.:',.`•/7.-il•••• irv:iti; , •• • •--— • ________ 8?"••••• :•'.".".-v•.;"•. 4 • •• --- •..•••••• ,. ..• •.. •. - : . - • - • . , • r•- „....,:,.-....: •• . •. , 1 - . .._. . . - • ... . . . . ,_ • • • iiteit,... .,,.. •-•,•.-.."...., . • • _ •-••••-; . •• __ • _ _ • • _ • • • ,,,,. ..• ... rs-.:•,,.... ..-...:•.• . -: . \ t •...z.„....-.... .• . ....: . •••,.....,., .• .•:......., • • ze!..-....... .. .....,1 EAS: OF DAN S /a..' C. N.,,•••,:'•:'•' :',..'i RELi AS . . .• ,,, ,i,...•••••••-•i • •!•-•‘=•-* I 4.,...,,,„,„:......,.:.. ._...L.f -..,....':••IFI. ...4-., '..>i . X ' • '' '414,T4ke...M,I "ti I 7:e • THIS AMUSEMENT, made at 7/4 .•:. •_'.. ,,•:- •,..,. :.-/- A/--6,e, eAr ,washingtcn ,. • 3.1'...401,e......,:kc.,•,..7.441 ':''.,57..fill..irrii,•;.:1•:;1.41i. • ... .. _ ';',ctrs.e:•"-1••••:.:':-..!7•-..--1 • w' cc the /-/, q-•442w7 0S, ,..e.7eir.,7"..e.f..744 ,19 c 3 ,, by and between • :::-;0.•••f.!•;,:i.:7,,,,--.4.4z;1 .1 •,- l...t.,Ja ...4•••••,••;.:c•••-,•;;;. , _ , - .,`'.'4';','‘•-ef,'''! . -.•‘,...... '''-...;•,..., . /(j2-Irici•--- ' .„...., ., ' 11 - - f:k1X,/,04 .)6.7.6/e6d /17.1, -/ - - L• HUSBAND AhM WM, IGREI1 CALLED TS :-±RS.P. PARTMS,Jand EINGCOUNTXJ a MUNICIPAL -- 4...tfe.%,:e‘t•:.•••••4:';',La i • 7,,,i•,.••Wif...T.'7,11'na`-;J i CORPORATION, ItEREINAFTER CALLED THE SECOND PARTY, and . • Fig•KtV.141• 19.1 ' ' - . ., • mr•lerma• 4,I...-1. partiesgoreerroaant. =A warrant that they are the carers (tenant, , ?....%•47f4-17.7.IFSIA , •,-..1.,s.:4;-.4 1•#•.:42,:,:y.F4 v ••._. ,02 mortgagee) of that certain parcel of land described as follasst ... • • • • • . .___.- ..: !1,,,x4,•ftAk. ..,:i0,,,,,,,i$.,.r.• kiM•k?" •••'-‘i•s•tv., -•-•' 'A..rt ; . . • • • • ,• . .-,. ,......"0.._ ...:3-...,,,,, . . • -•• • • P.ecorded iri Vol. 11.Page 82. , ... . 0q.. %-,IreigA . . • . . - . ii.t._ ....-* ,,...4 . .. . -. A1 Wigiil,051 ,,, , . - -.:•.,.' _ .. %.,.;, ;1'......P ' ......4);:-:e.4 ,, 4V.5.0.4.ga41-:17:11 ?r14(0; ;;ZA71111 • ';`df:::_„'„Iv:sr.:Ile- •;:,-,,.::,:i . , . .. : .,,tev •. ./ 19 - 1 . • ' . . • '• ' . . , Mf.;.1dMili'li • . '.'• iiiiIit,lekin • .,-.,:. .41%V.Orle..17,1e*. ] • - • , 7'aF6O. .„a* ., • . --,..r.2:----A 4:;,0,. ,.... ,..-:._ • , -, • ...•,. , , ...,,,•-,F47:4..,..., , ! ar.d ' • . ' . . . . IrnAS, the secaad party by its Board of County Commissioners, is about to acoept , ,.....„.. , a•it.,43•41,• .• i • — •. • ... . for reccirding a plat laic=as • . :., •r 7 ,^ ,•• -- -sr. :;•.:4• •4tIrs,:';-".'1- i wterein'tha te.tairal drainage hew Prom said plat is at times across the property of the First •:-.,..x.y.', ,.,:..„...,:,41.-.,..-,fa. Patties, new, therefore . . , . . . . I . . IT IS MUTUALLY ATOM AS ITELOWS: that the said First Parties hc:eby consent to ' ',;.:7•41,:.MT4,Q., - , . the natural. flow of•surface water from said plat to be carried in its natural channel across r'.-%.*IfieP.,;-'-•,,,,., ', the property of the First Parties and to hold King County-blameless for any damage that may ,•4•;?:..,,,rtY--'.4.. ' . be cause/113y said drainage flew. I • '.."::.171..."-il.ari:• ,'";•.:7::.!. .4.. • ! .. .. ;:,c•-.1z7.6.'AM'zi.'11.-*:.;•:::1.1 .• Dr Tarrizss WHEREOF the parties hereto have herountc set their hand and seals at . :..i.k,--.Z=.'6%:.,•:.Q..fr...,..!;..4 . tiv3 day and year first above written. ''.•.0:•1!'-''•:-.;?.Tz7••,-."-*-'-:vr.: ' • I . . ,• i ".2 ...;-;-,-;,,,-,14?,•,,,c,,t47-.;?‘:.•••,.....% , 771 .St (4/(7,i ,/ 1.• 1,..."_..4...!:• 1 '''',.,.‘:*,?A-'!?.';,"W..•••• / •:::.:,.i.::•ii74,,,%;•:•:::rel.;..t4 ( , , " ...,/f/)/7/11.,:.f. f•Oi I 17. 'i . :-.....f.:414k'iW4 • • ../ ,•• ,. , ....„. ,- , / .•:-.2.-.--- ,./)..,,j,, , • ,.• ;-•:.,,,f.,,,...„a.... , ,• ,,..-. , ,...---.x.,.. . •-c7-52.... KL1G C , WASHEIGTON • . .:;...;•-•::-.4:.'i,:--'-•'-‘,.••••'f , ..- .. I.• . .. •'t, r 1 BY , ,,,...; ..,.....+...-..,...;,....,..il .. ",•.:‘.., •..'-'•.....-*;.:.• ..i.•?; . • . • rig. ),..4.4.4.:,...."....t. . • ‘,-,•i4,,,,i,-Al • ii.,;:ii,'440:7;:if...:;.:i • ATTEM: . . i ..., .. . ...-...s.:6•,: P.OHERT A. MOMS '.•Y•V.',4,,,i':tA ClerkA the B•wq. 7 )7 1 . . .. a BOA/XO Or' warn COMIMSIONERS ::...",- .21":7••"':'!..,!••••.',1% ; T2.7 (k9-€/4 ti) /i7,9/1----4--i4) -.. L U tepww• PARTY OF THE SECOND PART. - - •- . ... . . ,.•• • . . • , . . _ ... • . . ... • . • • . • ...•. , .• .... . . ... . . . , .. . .. . .. . ,. 1 • . . •:•.;:.,,:•,:...:-.-,.•••-• •••. I . . . .. .. . , . . . . . . I .• .,-._ -: - ' • . . ; , . • , • •.__... ..• . .. . .. . . . . .. ..... •. .. .. • . ... . • . . . . . . • . . .. .,. • . • . •• • -..-• •••••••..,r•••••• , ! 7'1."• 1959 1 ' .• • . .. ... -.. . • . ..:.. • .. . ‘ . .. . ,•..:.•.•• • • . . ••-. • " . • -.-•---- ._ .. _ •• ... .........._.•,... _ _.. .. . • • . ••.- . ..........-.1-,..;. :...,... :•--.:1-:.i. ..-....-,;.:-,......-f."...-,-....,-3.:,..„.f•--.!ic....j..:::_f•:z:...,-„,z.:,....,r.:i,:••,:•.:•:•;,•-•;;...,-;.,...-.7;.=:;.71-2..,..,,,...',.?.;,.;.'.--,,-::::;:.::::..:•••••.:•.;. ..::::. :- .- :- .....,• .- :::,......-• •:. ....•-•.:„....„..,..,.....,_-_,,,...,..,,--.14.f,..%7.:Lr'c •%;:r.tr7:it,;. .1,.....' .:,.7.:‘,,,? ,a..;Tecty17.1.,i'.....,.....,...:"._•-:;: .. • :VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS :::>::><>:L1 l D:[lSE<PE MIT>SEJBI�IIT 'AL'<: >> : > >WA[VEt]►> >11AD Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Elevations,Architectural 3 AND 4 ::< Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 xi tin: Easerr ; tecord Ex s:.:.:.g ase ens(Re o ......:.....:.... :::. ::.:::.:.::::. Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 )=1 or Plan �nN4 .::.. . . ... ... .. .. .:: .. .:::::::::::::::..::::.:::::::. . ..:::.:::::.:....:.. .:: Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 ;s:: a •• d ca ::S to a::::>::>::»::<:..:><;;::>::»:>::>::; Kir ...CQiari. .::'Assessar..:.::M. : rt [. ..tEn .:.. .........:::::.::.:. ..:..:::::.... :.:.:::.:..: .:.::.::..::::::::::::. Landscaping Plan, Conceptual 4 ..., List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 M ert Ow ers`a..for PraP::: y .:::.:> Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking,' LotCoera i &:Lartclsca iri...At1ai . a..... ........................... ........................... ..... ................................................................ Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Pos..ag� ... ..... Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 P...,uC lic:lNo ks.Appto.al Le. ..r?..::..:.:::.;................ .;. Rehabilitation Plan 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: g/?-770 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE - - APPLICATIONS ........................... ..................................................................... ......... .............................. .. ............................................ ..................................... ...... . . ....................: Screening Detail 4 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Traffic Study 2 TreeCuff�n ...::� etatton.Cfeartn .F:an..�:::::................. ...................:::::::::. ..:.:.::::::::::::::..:....... ....................::::::::.::.:::::::::::::::.:::................::::..:.:...:.::...::..: Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 "'t� tie •:::Pan:::Generali� d<>'::»::>::<:::>:::::>:>::»>:::>:::>:::::>::::>:::«:::>:<::«::::<:::>::»>:::>:<:>:: »::::;'>:;:::::>::>:::<:::>.>;>::>:<:>::>:::<:: ::>;:>: Wetlands Delineation Map 4 .................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................ Wetlands Study 4 < • e:: ::. . do s::.::::.:::.::.:::;::::::;:>>;:»:::::::: :::::::<:>::::>:«::><:::::_; <::>::::::> :::::«<:::>:<::::<::: > :»:::<:>::: ;>;::>::»»:_>:«::::<::::::>:«.>::>:<::::<::<:::::>::>:<:::::>:<::<:::> .::>:: : ::::::IVia•.;of:.�xist�n ::S.It..:Condl.....n..:. . ........................................... ................. ... ...... .............:::.......::.......::.......2 AND 3................................................... ...................................................... ...................... ............:•:::::.:::.::.;;:•;:;;:.;;;;...:•::;;•;.:•.::."...:.::,:::.:.;:.;:.;:.;:.; This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.sendev.plan.ing\waiver.ixols REVISED 5/17/00 *******.************************************************ ******** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/27/00 10:03 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0005345 Amount: 2,219 .47 09/27/00 10 :03 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: J&J CON #7393 Init: JEJ Project #: LUA00-127 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334390-0861 Site Address: 2232 NE 24TH ST Total Fees: 2,219 .47 This Payment 2,219 .47 Total ALL Pmts: 2,219 .47 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345 .81. 00.0007 Environmental Review 200.00 000 .345 . 81. 00 .0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 2, 000 . 00 000.05.519 .90.42 .1 Postage 19 .47 ‘r n'